Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Atherton City Council
October 16, 2024

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
October 16, 2024
Body
Atherton City Council
Pages
433
Original file
31.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on atherton.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
33 FIGURE HE - 9: RACIALLY OR ETHNICALLY CONCENTRATED AREAS OF POVERTY Source: California Department of Housing and Community Development AFFH Data Viewer RCAAs. HCD’s definition of a Racially Concentrated Area of Affluence is a census tract that has a percentage of total white population that is 1.25 times higher than the average percentage of a total white population in the given COG region, and a median income that was 2 times higher than the COG AMI.

The purpose of identifying R/ECAPs is to locate areas where residents may have historically faced discrimination and continue to be challenged by limited economic opportunity. Conversely, RCAAs are meant to identify areas of particular advantage and exclusion. For the purpose of the fair housing assessment, these designations are indicators of integration and segregation of a population based on race and ethnicity, and income status.

Atherton is considered an RCAA (based on 2019 data) because its total white population is 67% while that of the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) is 40%. The map below shows Atherton’s proximity to other RCAAs. Atherton is largely surrounded by communities that are also RCAAs. These include portions of Menlo Park, Woodside, Portola Valley, Palo Alto and Redwood City. As one travels West on El Camino Real ATTACHMENT 1

Page 163 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
34 towards Redwood City, there are fewer RCAAs. Although maps are not available through time, analysis shows that the white population has remained the majority demographic throughout Atherton’s history. Atherton has consistently had high home prices compared to San Mateo County and the Bay Area, suggesting that high income people are drawn to the area and are willing to pay a high price for large homes in the residential town.

The Stanford area has more racial and income diversity from its student body and staff.

The Palo Alto area is still expensive, and many employees of the University likely bypass Atherton and Menlo Park for cheaper housing in Sunnyvale and Redwood City.

FIGURE HE - 10: RACIALLY CONCENTRATED AREAS OF AFFLUENCE Source: California Department of Housing and Community Development AFFH Data Viewer ATTACHMENT 1

Page 164 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
35 FIGURE HE - 11: PERCENT OF ATHERTON HOUSEHOLDS IN POVERTY BY RACIAL/ETHNIC GROUP
Although poverty rates within Atherton are very low, there are still minor disparities by race. For example, 5.3% of Asian and Asian Pacific Islanders are in poverty compared to

3.5% of white households. While the percentage is zero, Black, American Indian and Alaskan Native populations may also face poverty in Atherton, but this should be interpreted with caution as the sample is far too small to draw conclusions. This change shows that, although the area is considered a RCAA, within Atherton’s small Black Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) population there are variations of experience.

Dissimilarity Index
The Dissimilarity Index, or DI, is a common tool that measures segregation in a community.

The DI is an index that measures the degree to which two distinct groups are evenly distributed across a geographic area. The DI represents the percentage of a group’s population that would have to move for each area in the county to have the same percentage of that group as the county overall.

DI values range from 0 to 100—where 0 is perfect integration and 100 is complete segregation. Dissimilarity index values between 0 and 39 generally indicate low segregation, values between 40 and 54 generally indicate moderate segregation, and values between 55 and 100 generally indicate a high level of segregation.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 165 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
36 The isolation index is interpreted as the probability that a randomly drawn minority resident shares an area with a member of the same minority, it ranges from 0 to 100 and higher values of isolation tend to indicate higher levels of segregation.

As shown in Figure HE - 12, per the Association of Bay Area Governments’ (ABAG) Data Viewer, the entire census tract for Atherton has a high racial segregation, characterized by a population that is greater than 60 percent White. This contrasts with the low- and medium-segregation areas immediately outside of jurisdiction boundaries, particularly in areas north of Atherton. Analysis of the DI between 2010-2020 indicates that surrounding jurisdictions made some improvement regarding racial integration from 2010-2020; however, during the same time period Atherton maintained the same or similar level of racial segregation, even with a growing diversity of residents. The Town acknowledges that it is critical to be aware of these circumstances and use it to inform the development of proactive policies and implement these practices to achieve higher incremental racial integration, as much as possible, within the jurisdiction.

FIGURE HE - 12: RACIAL SEGREGATION IN ATHERTON AND SURROUNDING JURISDICTIONS Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Data (2015-2019), Table B01001 ATTACHMENT 1

Page 166 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
37 Disability Status
The share of the population living with at least one disability is 8% in Atherton, which is the same as in San Mateo County and slightly more than the 7% in the Bay Area, according to census data. This has changed little over time, as the population was 7% in 2012. The three most common types of disabilities among those Atherton residents who indicated they were disabled are ambulatory difficulties (4.5%), cognitive difficulties (3.0%) and hearing difficulties (3.0%). There are no census tracts in the Town with a share of the population living with a disability above 10%, as shown in Figure HE - 13. Geographic concentrations of people living with a disability may indicate the area has ample access to services, amenities, and transportation that support this population.

In addition, there are an estimated 18 individuals in Atherton with developmental disabilities, which include Down’s Syndrome, autism, epilepsy, cerebral palsy, and mild to severe mental retardation. Of those in Atherton with a developmental disability, 27.8% are children under the age of 18 and 72.2% are adults. The most common living situation for individuals with developmental disabilities in Atherton is the home of a parent, family member or guardian; the second most common is independent or supported living facilities.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 167 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
38 FIGURE HE - 13: DISABILITY STATUS
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Data (2015-2019), Table S1810 Familial Status
In Atherton, 67% of households are married couples and 65% of all households have children under 18 present. This is compared to 55% married and 67% households with children for San Mateo County, and 51% married couples and 68% households with children for the Bay Area region. The town is home to fewer single-person households (13% in Atherton v. 22% countywide v. 25% for the Bay Area region). This is up from 61.7% of married-couple families in Atherton in 2010. The large, expensive homes in the area may draw prosperous couples in while also making it necessary to have income of two people to be able to afford the cost of living. Atherton has a similar share of families with children as both the county and the region (35% v. 33% countywide v. 32% for the Bay Area). It would appear that the greater concentration of large, single-family homes in Atherton compared to the region has little impact on the presence of children in a household.

The vast majority of households in Atherton are homeowners (93%). The number of housing units available by number of bedrooms and tenure is consistent with the familial status of the households that live in Atherton.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 168 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
39 In Atherton, the concentrations of households with children are found in the census tract east of El Camino Real, as shown in Figure HE - 14; however, there are very few households of individuals living alone are found in the entire jurisdiction. This is likely due to older households with children having grown up and left the household in the areas west of El Camino Real. In Atherton, 35% of households have one or more children under the age of 18, compared with 33% in San Mateo County and 30% in the Bay Area region.

FIGURE HE - 14: HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Data (2015-2019), Table S1101 Household Income
The household income distribution by percent of area median income (AMI) in Atherton is much more concentrated at above 100% AMI compared to the county (79% v. 49% countywide), and the Bay Area as a whole (52%). As shown in Figure HE - 15, there are no census tracts in the town with concentrations of poverty rates over 10%. The Town has fewer extremely low-income and very low-income households, both at 6%, that the County as a whole at 13% and 11%, respectively.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 169 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
40 FIGURE HE - 15: POVERTY RATE
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Data (2015-2019), Table S1701 Throughout the jurisdiction, fewer than 0.2% of households are low to moderate income, or below the poverty level. Surrounding jurisdictions, including East Palo Alto, Menlo Park, and Redwood City have broader bands of incomes and have significantly more households earning less than $136,837; the 2021 median income in San Mateo County.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 170 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
41 FIGURE HE - 16: MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Data (2015-2019), Table S1903 ATTACHMENT 1

Page 171 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
42 FIGURE HE - 17: SEGREGATION AND INTEGRATION
Source: California Department of Housing and Community Development AFFH Data Viewer

3.350 Access to Opportunity
This section discusses disparities in access to opportunity among protected classes including access to quality education, employment, transportation, and environment.

HCD’s definition for access to opportunity is defined in the text bow below.” ATTACHMENT 1

Page 172 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
43 Access to Opportunity
“Access to opportunity is a concept to approximate place-based characteristics linked to critical life outcomes. Access to opportunity oftentimes means both improving the quality of life for residents of low-income communities, as well as supporting mobility and access to ‘high resource’ neighborhoods28. This encompasses education, employment, economic development, safe and decent housing, low rates of violent crime, transportation, and other opportunities, including recreation, food and healthy environment (air, water, safe neighborhood, safety from environmental hazards, social services, and cultural institutions).”
Source: California Department of Housing and Community Development Guidance, 2021, page 34.

The California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) in collaboration with HCD developed a series of opportunity maps that help to identify areas of the community with good or poor access to opportunity for residents. These maps are based on the research on how positive economic, educational, and health “domains” (as outcomes are described) for low-income families are correlated to geographic factors and were developed to align funding allocations with the goal of improving outcomes for lowincome residents—particularly children. 29 The opportunity maps highlight areas of highest resource, high resource, moderate resource, moderate resource (rapidly changing), low resource and high segregation and poverty. TCAC provides opportunity maps for access to opportunity in quality education, employment, transportation, and environment. Opportunity scores are presented on a scale from zero to one and the higher the number, the more positive the outcomes.

TCAC maps identify Atherton south of El Camino Real as “Moderate Resource” and east of El Camino Real as “High Resource.” This is due to the relatively low Education score in Atherton tracts, as Atherton is commonly understood and accepted as a high-resource community. Table HE – 5 below describes the TCAC scoring in each of Atherton’s two census tracts across the three domains (Education, Economic, and Environment) as well as its overall opportunity category.
28 Neighborhoods with the greatest access to public parks, transit, schools, grocery stores, and health facilities.
29 For more information, visit the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee’s CTCAC/HCD Opportunity Area Maps website at https://www.treasurer.ca.gov/ctcac/opportunity.asp ATTACHMENT 1

Page 173 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
44 TABLE HE - 5: TCAC OPPORTUNITY SCORES BY TRACT AND DOMAIN Tract 6114 Tract 6115
Education 73 81
Economic 40 61
Environment 64 74
Overall Opportunity
Category
Moderate Resource High Resource
Source: California State Treasurer’s Office California Tax Credit Allocation Committee Education
TCAC’s education score is based on math proficiency, reading proficiency, high school graduation rates, and the student poverty rate. According to TCAC’s educational opportunity map, census tracts in Atherton score between 0.25 and 0.75—opportunity scores are presented on a scale from zero to one and the higher the number, the more positive the outcomes. The census tract scoring between 0.25 and 0.50 is located south/west of El Camino Real and the census tract to the east scores between 0.50 and

0.75, as shown in Figure HE – 18 below. These relatively low education scores impact the TCAC Opportunity Mapping for Atherton. In outreach with Atherton residents, individuals state that the relatively worse-performing schools do not make a significant impact on ameliorating housing costs in Atherton. On the contrary, Atherton residents note that they often prefer spending on private education, adding to the cost of living in the town.

Patterns within San Mateo County reveal that over the last decade, schools have become increasingly more diverse, with Hispanic students making up 38% of enrollments.

Ravenswood and Redwood City, to the West and Northeast of Atherton respectively, have the highest number of Hispanic students in the County at 84% and 70%. In Redwood City Elementary, which includes Adelante Selby Spanish Immersion School in Atherton, more than one-third of students are English learners. Ravenswood serves the census tract that scored between 0.25 and 0.50. Therefore, the significant number of English learner students could be skewing down the educational outcomes in that census tract compared to schools with more proficient English speakers An astounding 30% of students at Ravenswood Elementary are experiencing homelessness compared to the county-rate of 2%. Without a stable place to complete schoolwork and, most importantly, feel safe and secure, students are unable to reach their full potential and thus have lower education scores. There are limited affordable housing options in Atherton and other jurisdictions surrounding Ravenswood for families to access once they are displaced.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 174 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
45 FIGURE HE - 18: TCAC EDUCATION SCORES
Source: California State Treasurer’s Office California Tax Credit Allocation Committee Atherton is served by the Menlo Park City, Redwood City, and Las Lomitas Elementary School Districts; and the Sequoia Union Unified High School District.

Menlo Park City Elementary experienced an increase in enrollment of 6% from 2010 to 2020, while enrollment in Redwood City Elementary and Las Lomitas Elementary decreased 11% and 16% respectively. This represents a much larger decrease than the one percent decrease experienced in the county.

Enrollment in Sequoia Union Unified High School District increased by 18% from 2010 to 2020. Enrollment at Menlo Atherton High School is approximately 2,400 students, with 5% of those students residing in Atherton.

Enrollment composition by race and ethnicity varies by district. Menlo Park City Elementary and Las Lomitas Elementary have a higher share of White students than San Mateo County (55%, and 53% respectively, v. 26%). Redwood City Elementary has a much higher share of Hispanic students than San Mateo County (70% v. 38%). The ATTACHMENT 1

Page 175 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
46 enrollment composition in Sequoia Union High School District is similar to the countywide distribution.

Atherton has received an average of 18 short-term enrollments of migrant student workers per year according to California Department of Education data. This is significantly fewer than the county level, which sees an average of 416 per year.

Overall, 29% of public-school students in San Mateo County qualify for reduced lunch.

This number was substantially higher in Redwood City Elementary School District (which includes Atherton’s Adelante Selby Spanish Immersion School), where 56% of students qualify for reduced lunch. County-wide, 20% of public-school students are English learners. Again, this rate is higher at Redwood City Elementary, where 38% of students are English learners.

In contrast, the share of students who qualify for reduced lunch, are experiencing homelessness, or are English learners is lower in Menlo Park City Elementary and is significantly lower in Las Lomitas Elementary than the countywide share.

Countywide 27% of Hispanic students met or exceeded mathematics testing standards and 40% met or exceeded English testing standards. Hispanic students in Menlo Park City Elementary, Las Lomitas Elementary, and Redwood City Elementary, which includes Atherton’s Adelante Selby Spanish Immersion School, performed better compared to the county (55%, 44%, and 34% respectively in mathematics and 62%, 65%, and 43% in English). Many high schoolers in the county met admission standards for a University of California (UC) or California State University (CSU) school. Of the high school districts in San Mateo County, Sequoia Union had the highest rate of graduates who met such admission standards at 69% followed by San Mateo Union High with 68%. Pacific Islander, Hispanic, and Black students in the Sequoia Union district were less likely than their peers of other races and ethnicities to meet the admission standards with rates of 38%, 55%, and 50%, respectively.

Despite the high share of students meeting college admission standards, Sequoia Union has the second to lowest college going rate in the County, at 70%. The highest rate was 77% in San Mateo Union High.

In addition, Sequoia Union district has the highest dropout rate in the County (10%) and dropout rates among Pacific Islander (20%), Hispanic (16%), and Black (12%) students are much higher. Students with disabilities and those learning English dropped out at the highest rate at 24% and 27%, respectively. This is a sign that the district does not offer adequate support for students facing barriers because of their race, language skill, and disability. However, there are promising increases in diversity of school staff that serve as an advantage to a diverse student body.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 176 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
47 Another possible reason can be traced to chronic absenteeism, which means students miss more than 10% of school days. 17% of students in the Sequoia Union High School District struggle with chronic absenteeism, which drastically lowers test scores and social engagement with peers and mentors. Black and Hispanic students were more likely to be chronically absent. Schools with more homeless students also saw more chronic absenteeism, illuminating a connection between school performance and stable housing.

Menlo College has a student population of more than 825. Demographics of the College are 29% White, 6% Black, 22% Hispanic, 10% Asian, 1% American Indian/Alaskan, 2% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, 8% Two or More races, 14% International and 9% Race Unknown.

Employment
According to ACS data, top three industries by number of jobs in Atherton include professional and managerial services, health and educational services, and arts and recreation services. In the terms of job holders, the top industries are professional and managerial services, and health and educational services. The chart below shows employment by industry and region.

FIGURE HE - 19: EMPLOYMENT BY FIELD FOR ATHERTON, SAN MATEO COUNTY, AND THE

BAY AREA
Source: Housing Needs Data Report: Atherton, ABAG/MTC Staff and Baird + Driskell Community Planning, 2021.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 177 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
48 Atherton has a lower job to household ratio at 1.14 when compared to the county at

1.59. The town has a slightly higher unemployment rate than the county, but saw a sharp incline in the unemployment rate in 2020 that has yet to return to pre pandemic levels.

TCAC’s economic opportunity score is comprised of poverty, adult educational attainment, employment, job proximity, and median home value. The entire town area scores more than 0.75 for economic opportunity—highest economic outcome.

HUD’s job proximity index shows the eastern part of the town in relatively close proximity to jobs (score between 60 to 80) while the western part scores between 40 and 60— on a scale from zero to 100 where 100 is the closest proximity to jobs.

There are several barriers to high paying jobs for protected classes, most of which can be traced back to educational opportunities and outcomes. As highlighted in the previous education section, Black, Hispanic, and English language learners have the highest school absenteeism and drop out rate in the school district covering Atherton. The majority of employment in Atherton is in the financial and professional service sector and the health and educational services sector. Most of these jobs likely require education beyond high school. Because Black and Hispanic students are more likely to drop out, employment options that will provide adequate pay to financially qualify for housing in Atherton are drastically reduced.

In general, new jobs continue to outpace new homes, and especially new affordable homes, in the county. Since 2010, the county has added 100,000 jobs but only 10,000 new homes. Jobs are expected to increase 22 percent between 2020 and 2050 based on ABAG projections. While residents in the county may technically have more employment opportunities, the lack of affordable housing near these jobs will continue to act as a barrier to accessing these employment opportunities.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 178 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
49 FIGURE HE - 20: JOBS PROXIMITY INDEX
Source: HUD
Transportation
This section provides a summary of the transportation system that serves Atherton and the broader region including emerging trends and data relevant to transportation access in the town. The San Mateo County Transit District (SMCTD) acts as the administrative body for transit and transportation programs in the county including SamTrans and the Caltrain commuter rail. SamTrans provides bus services in San Mateo County, including Redi-Wheels paratransit service.

In 2018, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), which covers the entire Bay Area region, adopted a coordinated public transit and human services transportation plan. While developing the coordinated plan, the MTC conducted extensive community outreach about transportation within the area. That plan—which was developed by assessing the effectiveness of how well seniors, persons with disabilities, veterans, and people with low incomes are served—was reviewed to determine gaps in services in San Mateo and the county overall. Below is a summary of comments relevant to San Mateo County overall. There were no comments specific to Atherton.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 179 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
50 “San Mateo’s PCC and County Health System, as well as the Peninsula Family Service Agency provided feedback. The most common themes expressed had to do with pedestrian and bicycle needs at specific locations throughout the county, though some covered more general comments such as parked cars blocking sidewalk right-of-way and a desire for bike lanes to accommodate motorized scooters and wheelchairs.

Transportation information, emerging mobility providers, and transit fares were other common themes.

While some comments related to the use of car share, transportation network companies (TNCs), or autonomous vehicles as potential solutions, other comments called for the increased accessibility and affordability of these services in the meantime.”30
A partnership between the World Institute on Disability and the MTC created the research and community engagement project TRACS (Transportation Resilience, Accessibility & Climate Sustainability). The project’s overall goal is to, “stimulate connection and communication between the community of seniors and people with disabilities together with the transportation system– the agencies in the region local to the San Francisco Bay, served by MTC.”31
As part of the TRACS outreach process, respondents were asked to share their compliments or good experiences with MTC transit. One respondent who had used multiple services said, “it is my sense that SamTrans is the best Bay Area transit provider in terms of overall disability accommodation.”
The San Mateo County Transit District updated their Mobility Plan for Older Adults and People with Disabilities in 2018. According to the district, the county’s senior population is expected to grow more than 70% over the next 20 years and the district is experiencing unprecedented increases in paratransit ridership. The plan is targeted at developing effective mobility programs for residents with disabilities and older adults including viable alternatives to paratransit, partnerships, and leveraging funding sources.32 30 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan, https://mtc.ca.gov/sites/default/files/MTC_Coordinated_Plan.pdf 31 World Institute on Disability Transportation Accessibility Resources, https://wid.org/transportationaccessibility/ 32San Mateo County Transit District Senior Mobility Action Plan, https://www.samtrans.com/Planning/Planning_and_Research/Mobility_Plan_for_Older_Adults_and_Peopl e_with_Disabilities.html
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 180 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
51 MTC also launched Clipper START—an 18-month pilot project— in 2020 which provides fare discounts on single transit rides for riders whose household income is no more than double the federal poverty level.33 In 2020, Caltrain voted to close Atherton’s station due to low ridership. There were some residents that thought this would be harmful to those who do not have access to a car or cannot drive, such as the elderly and disabled community; however, there were alternative resources identified such as the nearby Menlo Park Train Station and associated bus lines on El Camino Real and Middlefield Road.34
Environment
TCAC’s opportunity areas environmental scores are based on the CalEnviroScreen 4.0 indicators, which identify areas disproportionately vulnerable to pollution sources such as ozone, PM2.5, diesel PM, pesticides, toxic release, traffic, cleanup sites, groundwater threats, hazardous waste, impaired water bodies, and solid waste sites.

According to TCAC’s opportunity map, as shown in Figure HE - 21, census tracts in Atherton score between 0.50 and 0.75 – opportunity scores are presented on a scale from zero to one and the higher the number, the more positive the outcomes. The town scores the highest on the California Healthy Places Index (HPI) developed by the Public Health Alliance of southern California (PHASC). The HPI includes 25 community characteristics in eight categories including economic, social, education, transportation, neighborhood, housing, clean environment, and healthcare.35 33 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Clipper Start, https://mtc.ca.gov/planning/transportation/access-equity-mobility/clipperr-startsm 34Zachary Clark, “Residents react to plan to close Atherton’s Caltrain Stop,” The Daily Journal, August 4, 2020
https://www.smdailyjournal.com/news/local/residents-react-to-plan-to-close-atherton-s-caltrainstop/article_3070cdd2-d539-11ea-ad6b-4b3eeab63a6c.html 35 See “The Healthy Places Index”, https://www.healthyplacesindex.org/ ATTACHMENT 1

Page 181 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
52 FIGURE HE - 21: TCAC ENVIROMENT SCORES
Source: California State Treasurer’s Office California Tax Credit Allocation Committee Disparities In Access to Opportunity
Racial and ethnic minorities are more likely to live in moderate resource areas compared to non-Hispanic White residents. Figure HE – 22 details the percentage of households by race living in resource areas. Note that there are no households in Atherton living in a low resource area. 71% of Hispanic households live in moderate resource areas compared with 29% in high resource areas. Similarly, 77% of Black households live in moderate resource areas and 23% live in high resource areas. NonHispanic, multiple race households have the highest population in high resource areas, however this population is relatively small with 323 households compared with 4,966 white households. Racial and ethnic minorities living in Atherton are wealthier compared to the county and Atherton is home to a disproportionately small share of residents with limited English proficiency (1% compared to 7% countywide).

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 182 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
53 FIGURE HE - 22: TCAC POPULATION COMPOSITION OF SELECT RESOURCE AREAS Source: California State Treasurer’s Office California Tax Credit Allocation Committee TCAC’s composite opportunity score for Atherton shows census tracts west of El Camino Real fall within moderate resource areas while the rest is within high resource areas, as shown in Figure HE - 23. This is an artifact of data, particularly the relatively low education scores in that tract, and belies Atherton’s other exclusive high-resource and highopportunity indicators.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 183 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
54 FIGURE HE - 23: TCAC OPPORTUNITY AREAS
Source: California State Treasurer’s Office California Tax Credit Allocation Committee The Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) provided by the CDC—ranks census tracts based on their ability to respond to a disaster—includes four themes of socioeconomic status, household composition, race or ethnicity, and housing and transportation. The index, presented in Figure HE – 24 shows the entirety of Atherton as a low vulnerability area.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 184 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
55 FIGURE HE - 24: SOCIAL VULNERABILITY INDEX
Source: CDC
Atherton does not have any disadvantaged communities as defined under SB 535, “disadvantaged communities are defined as “the top 25% scoring areas from CalEnviroScreen along with other areas with high amounts of pollution and low populations.”36
Disparities Specific to the Population Living with a Disability Eight percent of the population in Atherton are living with at least one disability, as defined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in the text box below, the same share as in the county (7% live with a disability in the Bay Area region). The most common disabilities in the town are ambulatory (4.5%), cognitive (3.1%), and hearing (3.0%). For the county and Bay Area region, the most common are ambulatory difficulty (4% in San Mateo County, 5% in region), independent living difficulty (3% and 4%, respectively) and a cognitive difficulty (3% and 4%, respectively). 36 https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/sb535
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 185 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
56 “Disability types include hearing difficulty, vision difficulty, cognitive difficulty, ambulatory difficulty, self-care difficulty, and independent living difficulty.”
Source: California Department of Housing and Community Development Guidance, 2021, page 36.

For the population 65 and over the share of the population with an ambulatory or independent living difficulty increases. As mentioned above under access to transportation, San Mateo County is rapidly aging, therefore this population with a disability is likely to increase.

Unemployment is disproportionately high among residents living with a disability, at 11% compared to 5% for residents without a disability in Atherton—particularly when compared to the county. High unemployment rates among this population points to a need for increased services and resources to connect this population with employment opportunities.

Disability
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 186 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
57 FIGURE HE - 25: ACCESS TO OPPERTUNITIES
Source: California Department of Housing and Community Development AFFH Data Viewer

3.360 Disparate Housing Needs
This section discusses disparate housing needs for protected classes including cost burden and severe cost burden, overcrowding, substandard housing conditions, homelessness, displacement, Extremely Low Income (ELI) households, and other considerations
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 187 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
58 .Disproportionate Housing Needs
“Disproportionate housing needs generally refers to a condition in which there are significant disparities in the proportion of members of a protected class experiencing a category of housing need when compared to the proportion of members of any other relevant groups, or the total population experiencing that category of housing need in the applicable geographic area. For purposes of this definition, categories of housing need are based on such factors as cost burden and severe cost burden, overcrowding, homelessness, and substandard housing conditions.” Source: California Department of Housing and Community Development Guidance, 2021, page 39.

Housing Needs
The town experienced a sharp loss in population between 1990 and 2000 and again between 2009 and 2010. Since 2010 population growth has been slower than the county’s and region’s, as seen in Figure HE - 26, and the town has not reached the population level it had prior to the 2008-’09 financial crisis. However, the town does not appear to have experienced a sharp population decrease in 2020, with the COVID-19 pandemic.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 188 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
59 FIGURE HE - 26: POPULATION CHANGE IN ATHERTON, SAN MATEO COUNTY, AND THE BAY AREA REGION 1990-2020 (USING 1990 AS “INDEX” YEAR OF 100 Source: California Department of Finance, E-5 series
Since 2015, the housing permitted to accommodate growth has largely been priced for above moderate-income households, with 78 units permitted for above moderateincome households compared to 35 for very low-income households, 15 for low-income households, and 3 for moderate income households. The Housing Needs Data Report for Atherton indicates new construction is slower than the rest of the Bay Area24 and has not kept pace with demand throughout the Bay Area, “resulting in longer commutes, increasing prices, and exacerbating issues of displacement and homelessness.” 37 One 37 Housing Needs Data Report: Atherton, ABAG/MTC Staff and Baird + Driskell Community Planning, 2021. 90 95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
1990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020 Index (Year %s = Index 100)
Index
Atherton
Index
San Mateo County
Index
Bay Area
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 189 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
60 reason for this may be that Atherton has very low turnover in its housing stock. People may become Athertonians when they begin a family, but they often stay through retirement. This presents a unique challenge for housing mobility and is also connected to the need for senior resources identified elsewhere in this document.

One example of a group who has found workforce housing hard to come by are the employees of the Atherton Police Department. In 2018, employees advised the City Council that they faced long commutes on top of twelve-hour shifts and had little time to sleep. The commute was necessary because there are limited affordable options in the region for their families. In the past, the town had used a town-owned property in a deedrestricted park as a place for police to sleep. This solution was not sustainable for the town or police officers, who wanted to spend more time with their families instead of commuting.25 This makes recruitment and retention difficult.

The variety of housing types available in the town in 2020 are predominantly single family (98%), as shown in Figure HE - 27. Six multi-family homes were added in 2020. Single family detached saw a decline in units (2,453 from 2,514, or -2.4%) and single family attached saw a substantial increase (46 from 16, or 6188%). Due to its land use and zoning, Atherton has developed far fewer multi-family units than the region. 38 38 Housing Needs Data Report: Atherton, ABAG/MTC Staff and Baird + Driskell Community Planning, 2021.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 190 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
61 FIGURE HE - 27: HOUSING UNITS BY TYPE IN ATHERTON IN 2010 AND 2020 Source: California Department of Finance, E-5 series
According to the ABAG Housing Data Workbook, the majority of the housing inventory in Atherton was constructed from 1940 to 1959, with 1,087 units built between 1940 to 1959 compared to 180 units built in 2010 or later However, actual Town building permit records reflect that from 2010 forward more than 320 new single-family home building permits were issued. Compared to San Mateo County, the Town’s owner-occupied housing market has a greater share of units priced above $2 million. Ninety percent (90%) of units in Atherton fall within this price range compared to 19% in the county. According to the Zillow home value index, home prices have experienced exponential growth in the town and the county. The town is an outlier, with the Zillow home value index at $6.6 million for Atherton compared to the county’s $1.4 million.

Given the small share of renters in the town, rental price trends are less accurate than the County’s, but appear to have experienced high appreciation since 2014. Compared to the county, Atherton has more expensive rental units according to the US Census Bureau’s ACS data—67% of units rent for more than $3,000 per month in the town compared to 22% in the county. A point-in-time Google search found no home for rent under $5,000 per month, but the attestations of 2023 ADU rentals (41 respondents) have a median ADU rental of cost $0 and an average rental monthly cost of $765. As implied by the low rents, these ADUs are often rented to a close friend or family member and ATTACHMENT 1

Page 191 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
62 may be difficult to find for workers or other community members. Workers would need higher incomes to qualify for rentals available in Atherton–and are thus inclined to seek out homeownership or lower cost rental opportunities in other communities. However, the Town is in the process of implementing a robust and inclusive ADU program that will facilitate, support, and encourage the development and rental of accessory dwelling units at affordable rates via a Human Investment Project, Inc. (HIP Housing) Program.

Resident survey data provide evidence of more rental inventory, reporting that owners are renting ADUs to senior family members, students, school faculty, and local service workers at significantly reduced or below market rental prices. Many of these rental opportunities are not marketed in the traditional way using Zillow, Craigslist or other platforms. Rather, because Atherton is a small community, property owners will reach out directly to those in need of such housing solutions or offer housing through a local school’s housing referral program.

Low-Income Housing Needs
Extremely Low Income (ELI) households are most likely to face overpayment, overcrowding and substandard housing conditions. The projected housing need for ELI households is 47 units. This is calculated by taking half of Atherton’s Very Low Income RHNA (94 units) because ELI households are approximately half of the Town’s current share of households with incomes 0%-50% of AMI (114 Extremely Low-Income households and 142 Very Low-Income households).

Housing types suitable for ELI households include affordable rentals, accessory dwelling units (ADUs), emergency shelters, supportive housing and transitional housing. The town will meet this need through ADU construction and programs expanding opportunities for emergency shelters as well as supportive and transitional housing in Atherton.

Cost Burden and Severe Cost Burden
A low share of households in Atherton are cost burdened—spending more than 30% of their gross income on housing costs— compared to the county (27% in Atherton, versus 36% in the County, and 36% in the Bay Area), as shown in Figure HE - 28.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 192 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
63 FIGURE HE - 28: PERCENTAGE OF INCOME USED FOR HOUSING IN ATHERTON, SAN MATEO

COUNTY AND THE BAY AREA
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Data (2015-2019), Table B25070, B2509 Although there are far fewer lower income households, they are more likely to experience housing cost burden. households with income below 80% AMI are severely cost burdened – spending more than 50% of their gross income on housing costs. Cost burdened households have less money to spend on other essentials like groceries, transportation, education, healthcare, and childcare. Extremely cost burdened households are considered at risk for homelessness. Cost burden suggests that wages have not kept up with housing costs in the area. As seen in Table HE - 6, of the 256 households in Atherton with Extremely Low or Very Low incomes, 219 (85%) are extremely cost burdened, spending more than 50% of their income on housing.

When cost burden is broken down by Area Median Income (AMI), there are stark differences. The chart below indicates these disparities. Although those with greater than 100% AMI likely spend the most on housing, their incomes can meet these costs. 80% of those in this group spend 0-30% of their income on housing. In contrast, 88% of those earning 0-30% AMI spend over 50% of their income on housing costs.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 193 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
64 TABLE HE - 6: PERCENT OF INCOME USED FOR HOUSING BY HOUSEHOLD INCOME COHORT Percent of Income Used for Housing
Count (Percent) of
Atherton Households
Count (Percent) of
San Mateo County
Households
Count (Percent) of
Bay Area Households
Income Group 0%-30% 30%-50% >50% 0%-30% 30%-
50% >50% 0%-30% 30%-
50% >50%
Extremely Low
(0%-30% of AMI)
4 (0.2%)
10 (0.4%)
100
(4.4%)
5,315
(2.0%)
4,210
(1.6%)
23,190
(8.9%)
63,508
(2.4%)
59,990
(2.2%)
245,825
(9.2%)
Very Low
(31%-50% of AMI)
19 (0.8%)
4 (0.2%)
119
(5.3%)
8,405
(3.2%)
10,045
(3.9%)
11,540
((4.4%)
86,175
(3.2%)

98.055
(3.7%)
109,950
(4.1%)
Low
(51%-80% of AMI)
40 (1.8%)
30 (1.3%)
40 (1.8%)
20,290
(7.8%)
15,550
(6.0%)
6,510
(2.5%)
164,130
(6.1%)
129,050
(4.8%)
57,425
(2.1%)
Moderate
(81%-100% of AMI)
39 (1.7%)
23 (1.0%)
14 (0.6%)
17,555
(6.8%)
7,610
(2.9%)
1,625
(0.6%)
152,050
(5.7%)
76,080
(2.8%)
17,697
(0.6%)
Above Moderate
(> 100% of AMI)
1,454
(64.4%)
238
(10.5%)
125
(5.5%)
113,325
(43.6%)
13,055
(5.0%)
1,590
(0.6%)
1,237,595
(46.3%)
157,574
(5.9%)
18,312
(0.7%)
Totals 1,556
(68.9%)
305
(13.5%)
398
(17.6%)
164,890
(53.5%)
50,470
(19.4%)
44,455
(17.1%)
1,703,458
(63.7%)
520,749
(19.5%)
449,209
(16.8%)
Source: American Community Survey 2015-2019
In Atherton, approximately 95 percent of residents earning under $75,000 annually are overpaying for homeownership. Per Census data, 23% of those making more than $75,000 are overpaying for their homes. However, Census data does not provide additional detail regarding the “more than $75,000” income category, and the lower-income limit for San Mateo County is $149,100. This makes it impossible to quantify cost burden by tenure, even if there is data stating that 255 of Atherton’s 2,244 households (11 percent) are cost burdened and that 10 percent of renters are cost- burdened against 12 percent of homeowners. This is seen in Table HE - 7.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 194 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
65 TABLE HE - 7: HOUSEHOLDS OVERPAYING FOR HOUSING
Occupant Income
Atherton County Region
Count Percent Percent Percent
Owner-Occupied Less than $35,000 105 100% 80% 73%
$35,000 - $74,999 125 91% 52% 48%
$75,000+ 427 25% 20% 17%
Renter-Occupied Less than $35,000 0 0% 91% 91%
$35,000 - $74,999 0 0% 88% 65%
$75,000+ 25 13% 23% 15%
Source: US Census, 2020 American Community Survey 5-Year Note: Excludes Households with no income or cash rent
As mentioned previously, racial and ethnic minorities living in Atherton are wealthier compared to the county and Bay Area as a whole. A lower percentage of Asian/API and Hispanic households are less likely to be cost burdened than non-Hispanic white households. Households of other or multiple races experience higher rates of cost burden—56% are extremely cost burdened, compared to 16% in the town overall.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 195 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
66 TABLE HE - 8: HOUSEHOLDS OVERPAYING FOR HOUSING BY RACE Racial /Ethnic Group
0%-30% of
Income Used for
Housing
30%-50% of
Income Used for
Housing
50%+ of
Income Used
for Housing
Cost Burden
Not
computed
American Indian or Alaska Native,
Non-Hispanic
0 0 0 0
Asian / API, Non-Hispanic 70% (264) 15% (55) 12% (45) 4% (15) Black or African American, NonHispanic0 0 0 0
White, Non-Hispanic 67% (1,255) 14% (255) 18% (340) 1% (15) Other Race or Multiple Races, NonHispanic44% (8) 0 56% (10) 0 Hispanic or Latinx 85% (45) 8% (4) 8% (4) 0
Totals 68% (1,572) 14% (314) 17% (399) 30
Source: American Community Survey 2015-2019
As discussed, the majority of Atherton’s 2,190 housing units (1,950 or 89%) are owner occupied. Only 240 (11%) are renter occupied. Not only are a larger number of owneroccupied units cost burdened, but proportionally, when compared to renter-occupied units, a higher percentage of owner-occupied units are cost burdened, with 214 homeowners households paying 30% or more of their income for housing (9.77%) and an additional 345 homeowner households (15.75%) paying 50% or more of their income for housing. Only 30 renter households are overpaying for housing: 20 households (.091%) using more than 30% and 10 (.045%) using more than 50% of their income for housing.

TABLE HE - 9: COST BURDEN BY TENURE
Tenure % Cost Burden Number Percent
(of all households)
Owner Occupied 30% or more of income 214 9.77%
50% or more of income 345 15.75%
Renter Occupied 30% or more of income 20 0.91%
50% or more of income 10 0.45%
Source: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (2016-2020 ACS) ATTACHMENT 1

Page 196 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
67 Overcrowding
The vast majority of households (99%) in Atherton are not overcrowded—indicated by more than one occupant per room, compared to 7.9% in the county, and 6.9% in the region.
39 Racial and ethnic minorities are more likely than non-Hispanic White households to experience overcrowding. Other races (21% of households), and Hispanic households (19%), experience the highest rates of overcrowding in Atherton as shown in Figure HE -

29. In San Mateo County, 7.9% of households have more than one occupant per room.

This is slightly better than the state average of 8.2%.

FIGURE HE - 29: OVERCROWDING IN ATHERTON BY RACE

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019 5-Year Estimates Table B25014.

Overcrowding is often related to the cost of housing with multiple households sharing a unit to make it possible to afford the unit. Figure HE – 30 shows where overcrowding in Atherton and surrounding census tracts is more common. East Palo Alto and Redwood City have the highest percentage of overcrowding in the region, likely due to large 39 U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019 5-Year Estimates Table B25014.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 197 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
68 households – including multigenerational households – trying to fit in to smaller units due to lack of income and/or lack of availability of larger, affordable, units.

FIGURE HE - 30: OVERCROWDING
Source: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) ACS tabulation, 2013-2017 release
Substandard Housing
Data on housing conditions are very limited, with the most consistent data available across jurisdictions found in the American Community Survey (ACS)—which captures units in substandard condition as self-reported in Census surveys. According to data estimates, the share of housing units with substandard kitchen and plumbing facilities in Atherton is zero, despite an aging housing stock. This data estimate is further substantiated by direction from the Town’s Code Enforcement Officer. This could be due to the relative wealth and home-owning status of Atherton residents, making renovations financially and logistically feasible. San Mateo County also has an extremely low rate of substandard housing; 99.9% of households have complete kitchen and plumbing facilities. For the Bay Area region, 99.7% of households have complete kitchens and 99.8% have complete plumbing facilities.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 198 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
69 As shown in Figure HE – 31, residents who do not have complete kitchen or plumbing utilities tend also to live in severely overcrowded conditions, and are severely cost burdened, Atherton has less than 20% of residents in substandard conditions. In East Palo Alto and Southeast Redwood City, however, 40-60% of all households selected at least one of the substandard housing issues. Substandard housing congregates in areas of low income because these residents do not have the financial leverage to improve housing conditions, have landlords who are unwilling to make improvements, or do not ask for improvements or report conditions in fear of retaliatory eviction.

FIGURE HE - 31: SUBSTANDARD HOUSING
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Data (2015-2019), Table B25053, Table B25043, Table B25049
Homelessness
In 2019, 1,512 people were experiencing homelessness in the county, 40% of these individuals were in emergency or transitional shelters while the remaining 60% were unsheltered. The majority of unsheltered people experiencing homelessness were in households without children. The majority of people in transitional housing were in households with children. These disparities may indicate there are more resources available in the County for families experiencing homelessness as compared to for single ATTACHMENT 1

Page 199 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
70 individuals experiencing homelessness. The 2019 count identified one person in Atherton experiencing homelessness. In the Bay Area region, the 2019 count identified 36,701 individuals.

People who identify as American Indian or Alaskan Native (6% homeless, less than 1% general population), Black (13%, 2%), White (67%, 51%), and Hispanic (38%, 28%) are overrepresented in the homeless population compared to their share of the general population. The disparities by race can be traced back to discrimination in the housing market and the exclusion of non-white populations from high resource areas. There are few housing options for low-income people in the region. Housing that is available at the market rate likely forces people to spend more than 50% of their income on housing, which puts households at risk for homelessness.

People struggling with chronic substance abuse (112 people), severe mental illness (305), and domestic violence (127) represent a substantial share of the homeless population in 2019. This indicates that there are not enough resources or beds for those experiencing mental illness, substance abuse, and domestic violence in the county.

Displacement
Owner households generally enjoy a greater amount of housing stability whereas renter households are more mobile. Atherton has no inventory of income assisted rental units. In San Mateo County, 417 units are at risk, accounting for 8% of the total assisted housing units in the county. In the Bay Area region, 2,907 (2%) of the region’s 116,459 incomeassisted rental units are at risk.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 200 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
71 Displacement Sensitive Communities
“According to the Urban Displacement Project, communities were designated sensitive if they met the following criteria:
◼ They currently have populations vulnerable to displacement in the event of increased redevelopment and drastic shifts in housing cost. Vulnerability is defined as:
⮚ Share of very low-income residents is above 20%, 2017 AND
⮚ The tract meets two of the following criteria:
− Share of renters is above 40%, 2017
− Share of people of color is above 50%, 2017
− Share of very low-income households (50% AMI or below) that are severely rent burdened households is above the county median, 2017 − They or areas in proximity have been experiencing displacement pressures. Displacement pressure is defined as:
● Percent change in rent above county median for rent increases, 2012- 2017
OR
◼ Difference between tract median rent and median rent for surrounding tracts above median for all tracts in county (rent gap), 2017” Source: https://www.sensitivecommunities.org/
No census tracts in the town are vulnerable to displacement, however, housing cost burden is a risk for displacement and 88% of residents below 30% AMI pay more than 50% of their income on housing. Atherton’s rental cost is far above regional median rent, suggesting that there is displacement pressure in place. Assuming this number trend applies to the Town, that would mean that of the Town’s 149 extremely low-income households, 131 are overburdened by their housing costs.

As shown in Figure HE - 32, the entirety of Atherton is identified as ‘Stable/Advanced Exclusive,’ meaning that it was a high-income tract in 2000 and 2018, and that housing costs have only increased. Although some of the jurisdictions neighboring Atherton have the same designation, there are also areas that indicate low-income areas are ATTACHMENT 1

Page 201 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
72 susceptible to displacement or are undergoing advanced gentrification. Displacement can also occur because of natural disasters. Atherton is in San Mateo County, which is on the San Andreas fault and therefore has a high likelihood of severe earthquakes.

Houses in California are generally made to withstand earthquakes, but those who spend more than 30% of their income on housing costs likely cannot save enough to repair severe damage. This means those of lower income are more at risk of displacement.

FIGURE HE - 321: DISPLACEMENT RISK
Source: Urban Displacement Project, urbandisplacement.org Access to Mortgage Loans
Disparities by race and ethnicity are prevalent for home mortgage applications, particularly in denial rates. In San Mateo County, Hispanic (60% denial rate) and Asian/API (29%) have the highest denial rates for mortgage loan applications in 2018 and 2019, compared to non-Hispanic White households (18%). These numbers suggest that traditional routes to homeownership are barriers to non-white households. Credit score, assets, and income disparities between races show in denial rates.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 202 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
73 FIGURE HE - 33: DISPROPORTINATE HOUSING NEEDS
Source: https://www.sensitivecommunities.org/.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 203 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
74 3.370 Site Inventory Analysis
The Site Inventory analysis regarding AFFH is provided in Section 3.417: AFFH and Identified Sites

3.380 Local Data, Knowledge, and Other Relevant Factors The housing element must include local data, knowledge, and other relevant factors to discuss and analyze any unique attributes about the City related to fair housing issues.

This information should complement federal, state, and regional data with local data and knowledge where appropriate to capture emerging trends and issues, including utilizing knowledge from local and regional advocates and service providers. The element must also include meaningful analysis related to historical practices and discuss past, present and future investment practices and other information.

As previously described Section 3.310, the federal Fair Housing Act passed in 1968 prevented denial of housing found to apply to local zoning laws. Since that time, fair housing law continues to evolve at the federal and state levels. This is evident in the State of California’s 2018 passage of AB 686, requiring jurisdictions to address how they Affirmatively Further Fair Housing in their local housing elements. Although there has been no published documentation of explicit exclusionary practices in Atherton, the town’s history is deeply connected to the exclusionary history of the Bay Area. The area that is now Atherton is the aboriginal homeland of the Ramaytush Ohlone.40 The Spanish empire colonized the region in the 18th century and in 1795 provided a land grant to Jose Dario Arguello for Rancho de las Pulgas that included what would become portions of San Mateo County and the jurisdictions of San Mateo, Belmont, San Carlos, Redwood City, Menlo Park and Atherton.41 By 1801 all of the people indigenous to the San Francisco Peninsula had located to Mission Dolores. By 1834, only 37 descendants of native San Franisco Peninsula people remained, and by 1842, the population was 15.42 Throughout this time period the area surrounding present-day Atherton remained rural and agricultural, used predominantly as a cattle range.

Eventually, the Rancho was subsumed into the United States after the Mexican-American War concluded in 1848 and California joined the United States in 1850. As a result of political shifts and the economic pressures of new settlers arriving to California in search of wealth, the Arguello family had to defend their land titles in court. In their claim, the 40 The Association of Ramaytush Ohlone, available at https://www.ramaytush.org/ramaytush-ohlone.html 41 Plat of the Pulgas Rancho, finally confirmed to Maria de la Soledad Ortega de Arguello et al., available at https://oac.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/hb6d5nb3xp/?brand=oac4 42 Randall Milliken at al. Ohlone/Costanoan Indians of the San Francisco Peninsula and Their Neighbors, Yesterday and Today. Oakland, CA: Archaeological and Historical Consultants, 2009.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 204 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
75 Arguellos attested that the Rancho was nearly three times larger than what was ultimately decided by U.S. Supreme Court.43 Therefore, while the family did receive a land grant, they were not successful in receiving their entire claim. Additionally, their holdings were further diminished by a transfer of approximately 25% of their grant to their Attorney Simon Mezes as payment for legal representation.
44 In 1866, the Southern Pacific Railroad established a station in the area in order to ferry newly-wealthy San Franciscans to their second homes in the valley.45 Accessibility between the region’s major city and the large rural lots of the mid-peninsula heightened the attractiveness of Atherton as a residential area. During the mid-nineteenth century California experienced an increased in trade, population, and early industrialized development. Land ownership of the region’s rancheros transferred to increasingly smaller scale properties as a means for Spanish/Mexican owners to quickly gain capital and liquidate assets. Descendants of the indigenous populations, remained disenfranchised.

Atherton was incorporated in 1923 under pressure from neighboring Menlo Park, whose government was attempting to annex the land into its own boundaries in order to bolster their own property tax rolls (this was decades before Proposition 13 limited property tax increases in 1978). From the outset, early residents of Atherton intended to develop a town with large residential lots and no commercial uses (unlike Menlo Park, which had a commercial downtown with smaller parcels).

After its 1923 incorporation, Atherton remained small in the years before World War II, with a population of 1,242 in the 1930 census and 1,908 in the 1940 census. The town nearly doubled after the war, with a population of 3,630 recorded in the 1950 census. By this time Atherton was already established as an exclusive outpost. The family median income of $3,857 was about 17 percent higher than the average family income nationally. There were 237 private household workers (household staff, gardeners, and butlers) employed in the town’s 1,140 homes, or roughly one for every five Atherton households. By the 1960 census, there were 7,717 residents – a 113 percent increase over 1960. However, the number of Black residents, only increased from 75 people in 1950 to 76 a decade later.
43 Arguello v. United States, 59 U.S. 539 (1855)
44 ‘Who was Dona Arguello?” Published in Redwood City VOICE by James O. Clifford, Sr. https://medium.com/redwood-city-voice/who-was-dona-arguello-97075145a74d 45 Town of Atherton “History of Atherton” available at https://www.ci.atherton.ca.us/96/History-of-Atherton ATTACHMENT 1

Page 205 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
76 In the 1960s, continued disinvestment and urban renewal in areas surrounding Atherton, such as East Palo Alto, exacerbated housing and education inequality. Frustrated families in East Palo Alto petitioned for redistricting to address their concerns about education.

The lines were drawn and redrawn, and eventually many Black students were bussed to Menlo-Atherton high school. Entrenched housing segregation translated to tension within the school. Black students often felt unwelcome and white students described feeling unsafe in what developed as a microcosm of the exclusionary housing debate formed outside the school walls.46 The District Board of Trustees representing Menlo-Atherton High responded by limiting the policy to include only students living two miles or more from the school, strategically excluding Black neighborhoods as white students mostly had their own transportation. Protests and fighting ensued.

Housing and educational boundaries go hand in hand. Over the years, overt tension has abated, but the effects of District policies and land use decision-making can still be seen.

The zoning code in Atherton limits parcel size to primarily 1-acre parcels. This land use policy impacts student demographics (1) by limiting the overall number of students and (2) by skewing upward the household income level of those students due to the extremely high land cost. The zoning code in Atherton has almost exclusively permitted 1-acre parcels and single-family developments.

3.390 Fair Housing Issues, Contributing Factors, and Town Action Plan The factors contributing to fair housing challenges within Atherton is the high cost of land acquisition, zoning primarily for single family homes, and little affordable housing for those with moderate and low income who work in the town, other than ADUs and housing at local school sites. Per an analysis completed in 2022, the average land acquisition cost for a single acre in Atherton is approximately $7-8 million. The affordability of land is a high bar to the creation of affordable housing and the greatest barrier to development. The Town has taken a muti-pronged approach to address affordable housing. The best opportunities for affordable housing include ADUs and multi family units on school sites where the land is already owned by the entity. In addition, the Town has identified several properties for upzoning to permit multifamily housing. Coupled with the new multifamily zoning districts, the Town will adopt an inclusionary ordinance to ensure a portion of the new multifamily housing units are available as affordable housing to lower income households. These steps will address fair housing issues, including segregation. 46 Tara Madhav, “Community Control and Desegregation in East Palo Alto, California, 1958-1986” (UC Berkeley Charlene Conrad Liebau Library Prize for Undergraduate Research: April 2021), available at https://escholarship.org/content/qt84n6s7t0/qt84n6s7t0.pdf?t=qv7av0 ATTACHMENT 1

Page 206 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
77 The Town is continuing to see success in the creation of additional ADU units. The Town estimates that 60% of new rental ADU units will be rented at very low or low-income levels.

Based on existing precedent, these units are often used for housing for a senior family member, employees of the homeowner, students, or in other similar circumstances where the renter would otherwise be unable to find similar accommodations locally.

Consequently, the ADU occupants do not displace others from low-income housing that is available locally.

ADUs have several other advantages. They can be constructed at significantly lower cost than the cost to build a new multifamily unit. They can be located anywhere within the Town, which means such low-income units are geographically spread throughout Atherton. They are also politically popular and easy to permit.

The Town is implementing several strategies to further utilize ADUs as a tool for providing fair housing opportunities, including:
▪ Expanding community outreach to realize additional ADU development. ▪ Developing assistance programs for JADUs to make alterations easier and more cost effective so that additional units can be developed within the existing building envelope of houses and made available at more affordable rates. ▪ Amending the Zoning code to eliminate the occupancy limitation on other accessory units, such as guest houses and pool houses.
▪ Creating an inventory of existing pool houses and guest houses, and then working with a nonprofit to connect homeowners to prospective renters. ▪ Amending the Zoning code to increase the height limit to allow ADUs to be constructed above garages.
▪ Amending the Zoning code to allow two ADUs to be constructed on parcels that are 2 acres or greater.
▪ Amending the Zoning code to allow multiple ADUs to be rented on a property. ▪ Amending the fee resolution to remove the planning review fees for ADUs. ▪ Adopt an affordable housing impact fee on single family construction. The Town will make available funds from this program to provide very low-income rental assistance for eligible households identified by HIP.

The Town’s complete strategy related to encouraging ADU production and the rental of these units is provided in Program 3.812.

Further to provide greater diversity in the housing stock and opportunities for lower income households, the Town has included programs to rezone several properties to allow multi-family housing. These properties have been strategically identified to be near transit and services.

Additionally, the Town will be providing additional fair housing resources and training for property owners, real estate agents, and tenants, per section 3.823 E. This will be provided ATTACHMENT 1

Page 207 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
78 through a collaboration with other cities and towns, Project Sentinel, or other similar organization. This will provide information on reasonable accommodation and issues related to income and other forms of discrimination. This training could be mandated for multi-family developers, property owners and any resident renting an ADU or similar unit.

The Town will also create a webpage to host this information and improve awareness around fair housing training, issues and available programs. The webpage will also provide information on filing fair housing complaints with HCD or HUD.

A. Lastly, as part of its ADU rental strategy, the Town will implement a program (Program 3.823(G)) to affirmatively market low-income units to households that are under-represented in the Town in comparison to neighboring jurisdictions and the County. To examine the effectiveness and interest in the ADU strategy, a survey of potential renters in the area, such as employees of homeowners, school and city staff, and elderly individuals is also being pursued. Atherton has several housing element programs that make specific, measurable, commitments towards affirmatively furthering fair housing. These programs and commitments are covered in section 3.800: Housing Goals, Policies, and Programs. That section includes a matrix identifying Atherton’s primary fair housing issues, their contributing factors, a priority level for the fair housing issues, and Town actions to remediate the issue. The fair housing issues identified are:Lack of housing that accommodates people of lower-income with a disproportionate impact on people of color, resulting in a lack of overall socioeconomic and racial diversity in the city. (High Priority) B. The predominance of single-family detached housing in the city has led to an exclusive and high-priced ownership housing market relative to San Mateo County and the Bay area overall. (High Priority)
C. High land acquisition cost. (Low Priority)
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 208 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
79 3.400 HOUSING RESOURCES

3.410 Inventory of Sites Suitable for Residential Development State law requires that the housing element identify adequate sites for housing, including rental and manufactured housing, and make adequate provisions for the existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the community. This chapter includes an inventory of land suitable for residential development, including vacant sites and sites having potential for redevelopment, and an analysis of the relationship of zoning and public services to these sites.

These remaining sections of this chapter analyze how Atherton will meet its 6th Cycle RHNA. The section will also describe and map each of the housing development categories, analyze the current zoning shortfall, analyze zoning that encourages and facilitates a variety of housing types and then analyze related environmental constraints, infrastructure availability, and other housing resources.

3.411 6th Cycle RHNA
Atherton has a Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) of 348 units, which it will meet with 396 units projected over the 2023-2031 planning period. This provides the Town with a substantial buffer to ensure that sufficient capacity exists in the housing element to accommodate the RHNA throughout the planning period: a 14 percent buffer for units at all affordability levels, and an 18 percent buffer for lower income units.47 Atherton’s RHNA of 348 units is made up of four allocations per income category as shown in Table HE - 10: 94 units for very low income households (0%-50% of the Area Median Income (AMI)), 54 units for low income households (50%-80% of AMI), 56 units for moderate income households (80%-120% of AMI) and 144 units for above moderate income households (greater than 120% of AMI). These numbers represent new homes Atherton must plan for.48
47 “To ensure that sufficient capacity exists in the housing element to accommodate the RHNA throughout the planning period, it is recommended the jurisdiction create a buffer in the housing element inventory of at least 15 to 30 percent more capacity than required, especially for capacity to accommodate the lower income RHNA.” See “Housing Element Site Inventory Guidebook Government Code Section 65583.2” (HCD: June 10, 2020) available at https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/housingelement/docs/sites_inventory_memo_final06102020.pdf 48 “Frequently Asked Questions about RHNA” (ABAG: July 2020), available at https://abag.ca.gov/sites/default/files/abag_2023-2031_rhna_faq_-_july_2020.pdf ATTACHMENT 1

Page 209 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
80 TABLE HE - 10: ATHERTON’S 6TH CYCLE RHNA AND INCOME LIMITS Income Level Very Low Low Moderate Above
Moderate
% of AMI ($149,600) 0%-50% 50%-80% 80%-120% >120%
Maximum Household
Income* $91,350 $146,350 $179,520 N/A
RHNA 94 54 56 144
*=Based on family of four persons
Source: Department of Housing and Community Development Strategies for Potential Future Housing
Atherton will meet RHNA through a multi-channel housing strategy that includes the 433 units in the following six categories:
• Pipeline Projects: 52 units
• ADUs: 208 units
• Multi-family Residential Overlays (RM-20 and RM-40): 96 units • Underutilized Parcels: 29 units
• SB 9 Subdivisions: 48 units
These channels are described below in Table HE - 11. Of these, Pipeline Projects, MultiFamily Overlays, Underutilized Parcels, and SB 9 subdivisions are identified in the Site Inventory. ADUs are projected from recent development trends and not identified in the Site Inventory. The channels are described in detail in sections 3.412 through 3.416, below.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 210 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
81 TABLE HE - 11: ATHERTON’S PLAN FOR MEETING RHNA BY CATEGORY Income Level
Very Low Low Moderate Above
Moderate Total
RHNA 94 54 56 144 348
Units by Category 120 77 89 147 433
Pipeline Projects 1 1 2 48 52
ADUs 62 62 62 22 208
Multi-family Overlays 57 14 25 0 96
Underutilized Parcels 0 0 0 29 29
SB 9 0 0 0 48 48
Buffer 28% 43% 59% 2% 24%
Source: Town of Atherton
Of these 433 units, 197 are suitable for lower-income RHNA (very low- and low-income households). These lower-income units consist of:
• Pipeline Projects: 2 units with building permits issued with attested rents in Atherton’s annual ADU survey below low income limits
• ADUs: 124 units projected over the 8-year planning period using the ABAG region’s “safe harbor” approach calculating units based on past production (an average of 2021, 2022, and 2023 ADU production).
• Multi-family Residential Overlays: 71 units on parcels with sufficient density and size, factoring in capacity analysis and nonvacant site analysis Section 3.412 through 3.416 provide specific details for each channel of housing production. Figure HE – 34 illustrates the Site Inventory – the location of the parcels used for each of these housing types:
• 3.412: Pipeline Projects (gold)
• 3.413: Accessory Dwelling Units (not illustrated – projections are not tied to any particular parcel)
• 3.414: RM-20 and RM-40 Multi-family Overlays (red)
• 3.415: Underutilized Parcels (purple)
• 3.416: SB9 Subdivisions (green)
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 211 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
82 This figure also includes additional RM-10 rezonings used by the Town to affirmatively further fair housing (red outlines).

FIGURE HE - 34: SITE INVENTORY AND ADDITIONAL REZONINGS Source: Town of Atherton
RHNA on Nonvacant Sites
HCD requires additional findings to be made if a jurisdiction is meeting 50 percent or more of its lower income RHNA with units on nonvacant sites. As shown in Tabe HE – 12, only 15 percent (22 units) of Atherton’s lower-income RHNA is accommodated on nonvacant sites. ADUs and Pipeline Projects. Therefore, this does not apply to Atherton.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 212 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
83 TABLE HE - 12: RHNA ON NONVACANT SITES
Very Low Low
RHNA 84 units 54 units
Total Lower Income RHNA (including buffer) 148 units
Pipeline Projects: Lower Income Capacity 2 units (1%)
ADUs: Lower Income Capacity 124 units (84%)
Lower Income RHNA Accommodated with
Pipeline Projects and ADUs (Percentage)
126 units (85%)
Units Accommodated by Nonvacant Sites
(Percentage)
22 units (15%)
Source: Town of Atherton

3.412 Pipeline Projects
Housing Element law allows jurisdictions to count pipeline projects, or units constructed or under construction between the base year of the RHNA period (January 2022) and the beginning of the new planning period (January 2023), towards the RHNA. In Atherton, there have been 52 units with building permits issued during this period: 25 single-family residences and 27 accessory dwelling units (ADUs). All 25 single-family dwelling units are allocated towards above-moderate income. Of the 27 ADUs, four owners completed Atherton’s ADU rental survey and attested to below-market rate rents: one at very low income, one at low income, and two at moderate income. The location and type of these Pipeline Projects are shown in Figure HE - 35.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 213 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
84 FIGURE HE - 35: PIPELINE PROJECTS
Source: Town of Atherton
The table of pipeline projects describing the APN, address, permit issue date, building type, and affordability level is in Appendix 5: Electronic Housing Element Site Inventory Form.

3.413 Accessory Dwelling Units
Atherton makes use of ABAG’s “safe harbor option”49 to project future annual Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) production. In this process, the Town takes an average of the 2020 (13 ADUs), 2021 (29 ADUs), 2022 (22 ADUs, and 2023 (27 ADUs) production and multiplies this average by eight to determine the annual number of units built for the 8-year 2023- 2031 6th Cycle planning period. The average of the past 3 years of ADU production is 26 units. Multiplied by 8 (the 8-year planning period from 2023-2031) gives 170.66 ADUs, rounded up to 208 ADUs as seen in Table HE – 13.
49 “Using ADUs to Satisfy RHNA” (Association of Bay Area Governments: June 2022), available at https://abag.ca.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2022-06/ADUs-Projections-Memo_final.pdf ATTACHMENT 1

Page 214 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
85 TABLE HE - 13: ADU PROJECTIONS
Year # of ADUs
2021 29
2022 22
2023 27
Average 26
8 Year Accumulative Average 208
Source: Town of Atherton
The Town expects that these ADUs will be divided between very low- (30%), low- (30%), moderate- (30%) and above moderate- (10%) income categories based on ABAG analysis of ADU affordability. The “remainder” rounded-up unit is allocated to abovemoderate, as a conservative estimate. Therefore, it is projected that the number of ADUs produced in the lower income levels would be 102 units; 62 very low income and 62 lowincome units. There are also 621 moderate-income units and 22 above moderateincome units as shown in Table HE – 14.

TABLE HE – 14: ADU ALLOCATION
Income Category Number of ADUs Projected
Lower Income 124
Very Low 62
Low 62
Moderate 62
Above Moderate 22
Total 208
Source: Town of Atherton

3.414 Multi-Family Overlays (RM-20 and RM-40)
This section describes specific sites suitable for below market rate residential development so that a comparison may be made with Atherton’s new construction need by affordability category with its residential development capacity.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 215 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
86 The RM-10 Multi-family Overlay is not required to meet RHNA and is not included in this section. The RM-10 overlay is used by the Town to provide a greater variety of housing types, in order to affirmatively further fair housing (see “Promoting Housing Mobility” under

3.800 Housing Programs).

Site Inventory
There are 6 sites on 3 parcels covered by the new Multi-family Residential Overlays. There are three sites on Menlo College (APN: 073-601-100), two sites on Menlo School (APN: 070- 360-080), and one site on the Sacred Heart Schools campus (APN: 070-390-010). Of these six sites, two are used to accommodate very low-income households, one is used to accommodate low-income households, two are used to accommodate moderate income households, and one is used to accommodate above moderate-income households. Table HE – 15: Site Inventory below highlights the sites covered by the new Multi-family Residential Overlays and notes their size, general plan designation and zoning, as well as the proposed zoning overlay, resulting density and potential number of units. The table also includes a zoning adjustment factor and an environmental constraints factor to determine site capacity in adjusted units. The site capacity is the number of units that can realistically be developed on a site and is required to be identified by Government Code section 65583.2(c). The adjustment factors are based on HCD Guidelines50 and are explained in more detail in the Adjustment Factors section below.
50 Department of Housing and Community Development Housing Element Site Inventory Guidebook. Found at https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/housing-element/housing-elementmemos/docs/sites_inventory_memo_final06102020.pdf ATTACHMENT 1

Page 216 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
87 TABLE HE – 15: SITE INVENTORY
Address APN Lot
Acreage
General
Plan
Land Use
Designation
Existing
Zoning
Proposed
Zoning
Overlay
Overlay
Density
(du/ac)
Gross
Total
Units
Zoning
Adjustment
Factor
Enviro.

Constraints
Adjusted
Units Affordability
Menlo College:

Site 1
(O'Brien Lot)
073-601-00

1.8 PFS PFS RM-40 40 72 0.73 0.8 42 Very Low
Menlo College:

Site 2
(WWII Barracks)
073-601-00

0.3 PFS PFS RM-20 20 6 0.68 0.8 3 Moderate
Menlo College:

Site 3
(Admin. Bldg.)
073-601-00

0.5 PFS PFS RM-40 40 20 0.73 1 15 Very Low
Menlo School:

Site 1
(SE Parking Lot)
070-360-080

1.3 PFS PFS RM-20 20 26 0.68 0.6 11 Moderate
Menlo School:

Site 2
(SW Parking Lot)
070-360-080

1.0 PFS PFS RM-20 20 20 0.68 1 14 Low
Sacred Heart
Reconstruct Hsg.
070-390-010 1.0 PFS PFS RM-20 20 20 0.68 0.8 11 Moderate Source: Town of Atherton
None of these parcels were used in previous housing elements and therefore none require rezoning to be reused in the Sixth Cycle Housing Element. None of these parcels have any environmental constraints that would preclude residential development. In addition, they are all vacant and not used for lower-income housing, and do not require a nonvacant sites analysis. This Site Inventory is organized to ease readability and functionality within the housing element. The Site Inventory is provided in the format required by HCD as Appendix 5: Electronic Housing Element Site Inventory Form.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 217 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
88 Sites Used to Accommodate Lower Income RHNA
There are three sites, shown in bold in Table HE - 15: Site Inventory above used to accommodate lower income RHNA: Menlo College Sites 1 and 3, and Menlo School Site

2. None of these sites were used in a prior planning period’s housing element. All of them are zoned for at least the “default” density of 20 du/ac, and all are sized between 0.5 and 10 acres (as they are all smaller, vacant, subsections of larger parcels). Parcels smaller than 0.5 acres, or larger than 10 acres are considered inadequate to accommodate housing affordable to lower income households and require additional analysis as per HCD guidelines51.

Adjustment Factors
As part of its site capacity approach to the 6th Cycle Housing Element, Atherton uses the HCD recommendation52 of five adjustment factors to calculate the projected residential development capacity of the sites in the Site Inventory that can realistically be achieved.

Atherton uses different adjustment factors for each overlay zoning district: RM-20 and RM40 have different adjustment factors for Land Use Controls, Realistic Capacity, and Typical Density.

In addition, there is a site-by-site analysis of Environmental Constraints. There are no identified constraints on Infrastructure Availability on any of the sites. An analysis of each adjustment factor is provided in this subsection.

Land Use Controls
Based on an analysis of the zoning code updates and objective design standards adopted as part of the housing element, there are height and setback constraints that could conceptually have a cumulative impact on the maximum development potential of the opportunity sites. The RM-20 zone is assigned an 80 percent adjustment factor and the RM-40 zone is assigned an 85 percent adjustment factor. Although the development and objective design standards intend to allow for development at maximum potential, the standards could have impacts that would cumulatively limit the physical ability for developments to achieve the maximum allowed densities. These adjustment factors are required 51 Department of Housing and Community Development Analysis of Sites and Zoning. Found at https://www.hcd.ca.gov/planning-and-community-development/housing-elements/buildingblocks/analysis-of-sites-and-zoning 52 Department of Housing and Community Development Housing Element Site Inventory Guidebook. Found at https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/housing-element/housing-elementmemos/docs/sites_inventory_memo_final06102020.pdf ATTACHMENT 1

Page 218 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
89 by State53 as a conservative approach to ensuring projections meet housing needs.

Realistic Capacity
There is no history of commercial or mixed-use development in Atherton’s history.

The parcels in the RM-20 and RM-40 do allow non-residential components, even if the objective design standards do not allow non-residential development in the areas covered by the housing element sites. The Realistic Capacity factor for the RM-20 and RM-40 sites is set at 90 percent as a conservative estimate.

Typical Densities
Typical Densities refers to the “typical densities of existing or approved residential developments” in neighboring jurisdictions and is required by Government Code section 65583.2(c)(2) to be one of the factors used to determine the number of units. The densities of developments at lower and moderate-income levels in San Mateo County are typically built above allowed densities for their zoning district.

According to data collected by ABAG/MTC on San Mateo County, 14 lowerincome projects were built on average at 107% of maximum allowable density as established in their respective jurisdictions. 19 moderate-income projects were built at an average of 125% of maximum allowable density. A Typical Densities factor of 90 percent can be considered conservative.

Environmental Constraints
As part of the work for the objective design standards, each site was assigned an Existing Tree Coverage Factor of Low, Medium, or High. These factors are used to understand the Environmental Constraints on a site.
• Low Tree Cover: No Environmental Constraint adjustment factor • Medium Tree Cover: 80 percent Environmental Constraint adjustment factor • High Tree Cover: 60 percent Environmental Constraint adjustment factor As this adjustment factor is applied on a site-by-site basis, it is broken out into a separate column in Table HE-15: Site Inventory.

The adjustment factors for the two multi-family residential overlay zones follows in Table HE - 16: Adjustment Factors. The adjustment factors noted in Table HE - 15: Site Inventory are rounded.
53 Required by Government Code section 65583.2(c)(2)
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 219 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
90 TABLE HE - 16: ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
Site
Category
Land Use
Controls
Realistic
Capacity
Typical
Densities
Infra.

Availability Total
RM-20 0.8 0.95 0.9 1 0.684
RM-40 0.85 0.95 0.9 1 0.72675
Source: Town of Atherton
Nonvacant Site Analysis
Atherton’s six sites in the Site Inventory are all nonvacant. Government Code section 65583.2(g)(1) requires the housing element to describe the realistic development potential of each nonvacant site within the planning period. Specifically, the analysis must consider:
• The extent that the nonvacant site’s existing use impedes additional residential development
• The jurisdiction's past experience converting existing uses to higher density residential development
• Market trends and conditions
• Regulatory or other incentives or standards that encourage additional housing development on the nonvacant sites.

The RM-20 and RM-40 sites are on parcels with existing educational uses (Menlo College, Menlo School, Sacred Heart Schools). Each required consideration is analyzed in this subsection.

Existing Uses Potentially Impeding Additional Residential Development The sites in the RM-20 and RM-40 multi-family residential overlay zones, which are allocated for lower income housing, have been subject to intensive scrutiny as to whether they support higher-density residential development. Existing uses at Menlo College, Menlo School, and Sacred Heart Schools sites in detail.

Menlo College Menlo College is a private 4-year college located at 1000 El Camino Real sited on 31 acres of property (including 50% ownership of Cartan Athletic Field and Wunderlich Athletic Field) serving approximately 750 students.

Public and private school properties are zoned PFS (Public Facilities and Schools) District in Atherton. The PFS District currently allows multiple-family residential uses that could accommodate housing for very low- and low-income households associated with primary nonresidential use of property on the same site.

Menlo College currently has 567 beds in 5 residence halls for its students with an additional 288 beds added in the fall of 2022. The on-site student housing frees up housing units in the community and addresses the needs of very-low-income students that were ATTACHMENT 1

Page 220 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
91 experiencing homelessness. The College also has 25 housing units for its faculty and staff.

Most of those housing units are rented at rates affordable to low- and moderate-income households.

In recent discussions between the College President and Atherton Planning Staff, the President indicated that the College is very interested in providing additional housing on campus. He stated that there is always a demand for additional housing, that the existing units are almost always 100% occupied, and that shortage of affordable housing is a barrier to hiring. However, funding has been a barrier to housing production in the past.

The College President sent a letter, included as Appendix 6, that indicates that the College could support 40 to 60 additional units (see Appendix 6. Menlo College Faculty and Staff Housing Considerations.

Menlo School
Menlo School is a private grade 6 – 12 school located at 50 Valparaiso Avenue sited on

26.7 acres of property (including 50% ownership of Cartan Athletic Field and Wunderlich Athletic Field) serving approximately 795 students. The school site currently allows for the development of multiple-family residential uses, and two sites have been identified that can accommodate multifamily units.

Sacred Heart Schools
Sacred Heart Schools is a private preschool, K – 12 institution located at 150 Valparaiso Avenue on 60 acres for property serving approximately 1,195 students. The school site currently allows for the development of multiple-family residential uses, and adjacent parcels that may be acquired by the school in the future would likely be rezoned for such a use. There are currently 5 apartment units on the campus and housing for retired Nuns at Oakwood. The school anticipates this facility being renovated in the future (15-20 years) to accommodate faculty housing. The school has a need for faculty and staff housing. The school anticipates this facility to be rehabilitated in the future to be used for faculty housing (allowed under PFS zoning). The Town will work with Sacred Heart to conserve the 5 apartment units, resident rooms, and facilities for the Oakwood Retirement Community (see Program 3.827 Conservation of Housing).

There has not been any development at this density in Atherton’s history. Therefore, the following examples of multiple-family housing on school parcels demonstrate how existing institutional uses at Sacred Heart Schools are compatible with the school’s desire to build new faculty housing.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 221 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
92 • Della Strada Jesuit Community Residence, Gonzaga University, Spokane, WA: The Della Strada Jesuit Community Residence supports Gonzaga University’s overall mission by housing faculty and contributing to university’s existing educational and religious uses. Three campus-owned buildings were demolished to make room for a project that is 35,900 gross square feet (including non-residential uses) with 22 residences in a three-story mixed-use building. There are other university-serving spaces on the ground floor. The total project site is approximately 0.73 acres.

FIGURE HE - 36: DELLA STRADA JESUIT COMMUNITY, GONZAGA UNIVERSITY, SPOKANE, WA ATTACHMENT 1

Page 222 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
93 • Courtyard Townhouses, Northeastern University, Oakland, CA: Undergraduate dormitories at Mills College support the university’s intent to house students on campus. An open site on campus was developed as 36 residential units that are contained within three buildings on an approximately 0.75-acre site. Each building has 12 4–5-bedroom units stacked within three stories. Smaller units are placed on the top floor to allow for a reduction in floor area. Building footprints range from about 4,000 to 4,500 square feet, totaling approximately 13,000 square feet.

FIGURE HE - 37: COURTYARD TOWNHOUSES, NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY, OAKLAND, CA Redevelopment Factors and Existing Uses
The factors considered in Atherton match the development trends seen in San Mateo County and the Peninsula broadly, as noted in Table HE -17: Recent Development Trends.

Atherton has no history of affordable housing development to draw on, but there is a substantial sample of affordable development in the County and the San Francisco Peninsula broadly. Table HE – 17 shows how the development trends seen in recent housing development in the region, including nearby affordable housing developments, can be applied to the housing opportunity sites in the Site Inventory. These development trends indicate the substantial interest in residential development on sites that were previously nonresidential or residential, particularly if the development was only on a portion of a larger parcel and if the parcel was eligible for any transit-oriented development incentives.

The recent development trends are:
• A: Residential development on a previously nonresidential use (industrial or commercial site)
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 223 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
94 • B: Residential development on a previously residential use (intensification of existing use) or if vacant, a site allowing residential use • C: Development of a portion of a larger parcel with affordable housing • D: Transit-oriented development eligible
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 224 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
95 TABLE HE - 17: RECENT DEVELOPMENT TRENDS
Source: Town of Atherton Staff
Key:

A B C D
Gateway Menlo Park 1345 Willow Road Residential: Single Family High Density Residential R4S(AHO) 140 37 40 93% B Crane Place Menlo Park 1331 Crane Street Retirement Home Retirement Living Units District RLU(X) 93 99 97 102% B
Menlo Portal Menlo Park
104 & 110 Constitution
Drive & 115
Independence Drive
Office/Light Industrial Mixed Use Residential R-MU-B 335 104 50 208% A Firehouse Square Belmont 1300 El Camino Real Vacant Village Core VC 81 65 N/A N/A B The Village at Burlingame Burlingame Public Parking Lots F and N Parking Lot Howard Mixed Use HMU 132 157 N/A N/A A Alma Point at Foster Square Foster City 790 Alma Lane Vacant Civic Center C-M/PD/SHO 66 78 35 189% B Arroyo Green Redwood City 707 Bradford Street Parking Lot Mixed Use - Downtown P 117 86 N/A N/A A D 333 Main Street Redwood City 353 Main Street Industrial Mixed Use - Corridor P 125 77 60 208% A D Huxley Apartments Redwood City 1305 El Camino Real Commercial Mixed Use - Downtown P 137 180 N/A N/A A D 1409 El Camino Real Redwood City 1409 El Camino Real Vet Mixed Use - Downtown P 350 213 N/A N/A A D Kiku Crossing San Mateo 480 East 4th Avenue Parking Lot Central Business Support CBD/S 225 93 50 186% A D 1178 Sonora Court Sunnyvale 1178 Sonora Court Industrial Flexible Mixed Use I Zoning District MXD1 176 139 45 309% A D
Eagle Park Mountain View 1701 West El Camino
Real Commercial Village Center P 67 136 80 170% A D
Wilton Court Palo Alto 3703 El Camino Real Commercial Neighborhood Commercial CN 59 128 20 640% A D Edgewood Plaza Palo Alto 2170 W Bayshore Road Commercial Neighborhood Commercial CN 10 11 20 53% A C Villagio Cupertino 20187 Civic Park Lane Commercial General Commercial and Residential P(CG, Res) 150 69 25 275% A C D
210-260 View Street Mountain View 210 View Street Commercial View/Hope Street Residential Transition Area P(19) 8 14 40 34% A C
The Village Residences Mountain View 555 San Antonio Road Commercial Mixed Use Center Subarea P(40) 331 163 80 204% A C D Broadway Plaza Redwood City 1401 Broadway Commercial Mixed Use Corridor - Gateway Broadway MUC-GB 518 37 60 61% A C
12370 Saratoga-Sunnyvale Saratoga 12370 Saratoga
Sunnyvale Road Commercial Commercial Neighborhood CN 20 7 20 37% A C Raines Terrace Sunnyvale Raines Terrace Auto Dealer El Camino Real Corridor ECR 113 19 36 52% A C Development Trends: A: Nonresidential Redevelopment; B: Intensification of Residential Use; C: Residential Development Alongside Nonresidential; D: Transit-Oriented Development (Near transit and using incentives); Units
Proposed
Proposed
Density
(DU/AC)
% of Max
Density
Max. Allowed
Density
(DU/AC)
Project Name (if Applicable) City Address Prior Use Land Use Designation Zoning Development Trends
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 225 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
96 Examples of selected projects from Table HE - 17 are provided below, in order to demonstrate how these development trends may be implemented on parcels in the Site Inventory. While these developments are built at a larger scale than what is anticipated in Atherton, they demonstrate a demand for affordable and market rate units built to a similar density as to what is proposed on the housing opportunity sites:
• Gateway Rising, 1345 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA: Gateway Rising is the final phase in the redevelopment of the 1960s-era Gateway Apartments. This includes 230 units (a mix of one-, two-, and three-bedroom units), with seven units set aside for households experiencing homelessness and an additional 51 units for households earning up to 80% of AMI. The project has a density of 37 du/ac in three-to-four story buildings across a 4-acre site with a total residential footprint of about 57,000 square feet.

FIGURE HE - 38: GATEWAY RISING, 1345 WILLOW ROAD, MENLO PARK, CA ATTACHMENT 1

Page 226 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
97 • Villagio, 20187 Civic Park Lane, Cupertino, CA: Villagio is a mixed-use infill development on a formerly commercial site. The project has 80 new townhomes and flats built atop a podium of ground floor parking and retail. Centered on a courtyard, units are distributed among four buildings that are three stories in height on a total site area of 2.5 acres. The combined footprint of all buildings is approximately 51,000 square feet.

FIGURE HE - 39: VILLAGIO, 20187 CIVIC PARK LANE, CUPERTINO, CA ATTACHMENT 1

Page 227 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
98 • Broadway Plaza, 1401 Broadway, Redwood City, CA: Formerly a commercial shopping center, Broadway Plaza is a 518-unit mixed-use infill development that is being constructed in two phases – the first of which includes a mixed-use residential and office component. Three residential buildings are being built at a density of 37 du/ac on a combined 11.3-acre site that will include 24 very-low Income units and 95 affordable units. Residential buildings are five to six stories with a total residential footprint of 176,875 square feet.

FIGURE HE - 40: BROADWAY PLAZA, 1401 BROADWAY, REDWOOD CITY, CA While the examples above contain significantly more units than is what is anticipated to be built in Atherton, the presence of nearby infill development with similar unit densities demonstrates an overall demand for multi-family residential housing regionally. These projects demonstrate that a similar unit density can be incorporated with existing uses on PFS sites envisioned for Atherton’s RM-20/40 Residential Multi-Family Overlay Zone.

Table HE - 18: Existing Uses on Site Inventory includes Atherton’s Site Inventory, the existing zoning and residential zoning overlay, and their existing uses. The table also includes redevelopment factors identified by the Town that demonstrate a market trend or condition that indicates likelihood of redevelopment, as well as regulatory incentives that encourage additional housing development. These factors indicate a likelihood of development on the sites identified. The redevelopment factors that were considered in site analysis include:
• E: Improvement over Land Value Ratio of less than 1.0, indicating that the value of the property is “locked” in the land itself and not the building constructed on it.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 228 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
99 • F: Existing Building 30 Years Old or More, indicating that the building is near the end of its useful life (dilapidation and/or high vacancy is discussed in the site-bysite analysis) • G: Developer Interest, indicating ongoing conversations between developers and the property owner about residential development on the parcel. • H: Existing Maximum Floor Area Ratio of less than 0.5, indicating that increased development allowance would potentially spur new financial viability of the site.

The following incentives to increase residential development indicate additional enticement for residential developers. These are:
• I: Percentage density increase from previous maximum density, allowed by multifamily residential overlay • J: Location of density overlay. Whether the site is in an RM-20 or RM-40 multifamily residential overlay zone • K: Ministerial Review. Whether the site allows ministerial review per objective design standards
• L: Proximity to transit. Whether the site falls within an AB 2097-established half-mile from a major transit stop
• M: Resource Availability. Whether the site is in a High/Highest Opportunity Resource Area (2022)

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 229 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
100
TABLE HE - 18: EXISTING USES ON SITE INVENTORY
Source: Town of Atherton with calculations by M-Group
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 230 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
101

3.415 Underutilized Parcels
There are 29 vacant parcels that are zoned as of 2022 for and are suitable for residential development in Atherton. All of these parcels could potentially support ADUs and JADUs in addition to a single-family residence, but projected ADU/JADU development is credited towards the “Accessory Dwelling Unit” section described above. These 29 parcels can support 41 above moderate-income housing units developed during the planning period.

None of these parcels were used in previous housing elements and therefore none require rezoning to be reused in the Sixth Cycle Housing Element. None of these parcels have any unique constraints that would preclude residential development. In addition, they are all vacant and not used for lower-income housing, and do not require a nonvacant sites analysis
29 parcels developed over the course of the planning period could be considered a conservative estimate. In 2023, there were 49 new single-family dwellings constructed in Atherton (12 on sites with a previously-existing home). In 2022, there were 48 new singlefamily dwellings constructed (21 on sites with a previously-existing home). While the parcels that are still vacant may hold unique development constraints, the high value of land and housing in Atherton does ameliorate these constraints and ultimately allow for development of underutilized parcels.

A full list of these parcels by APN, including address (if applicable) and lot size, are available in the Site Inventory (Appendix 5)

3.416 SB9 Subdivisions
In addition to the 29 underutilized parcels described above, there are 24 parcels that could support SB 9 subdivisions, as highlighted in Table HE - 19: SB-9 Sites below. These parcels can support 2 single-family dwelling each (one lot split per parcel leads to 2 units).

All of these parcels could potentially support ADUs and JADUs in addition to a singlefamily residence, but projected ADU/JADU development is credited towards the “Accessory Dwelling Unit” section described above. These 24 parcels can support 48 above moderate-income housing units developed during the planning period.

Atherton has a strong recent history of SB 9 development due to its large lot sizes and high land value. Since SB 9 was passed in 2021, there have been six recorded lot splits using the law, and three additional lot splits are currently under review. This recent trend of 3 SB 9 lot splits per year from 2022 through 2024 aligns with the SB 9 projection of 24 parcels (eight years of development at three parcels per year).

These 24 parcels were identified based on their existing floor area ratio (FAR). All of the parcels have a very low FAR (under 0.20), indicating plenty of space for an additional single-family dwelling. Based on this analysis and a review of the nine parcels with existing ATTACHMENT 1

Page 231 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
102
SB 9 lot splits, Atherton has identified ideal candidates for a lot split. The selection criteria for identifying these sites is provided in the following section.

TABLE HE - 19: SB-9 SITES
Address APN Existing FAR
30 Atherton Avenue 070-120-130 0.10
29 Atherton Avenue 070-230-270 0.06
260 Oak Grove Avenue 061-232-140 0.06
75 Catalpa Drive 061-211-130 0.00
73 Hawthorne Drive 061-132-100 0.06
198 Fair Oaks Lane 060-220-270 0.09
188 Fair Oaks Lane 060-220-060 0.07
25 Isabella Avenue 070-250-250 0.00
82 Isabella Avenue 070-240-050 0.11
101 Britton Avenue 070-214-110 0.06
131 Britton Avenue 070-214-160 0.05
449 Selby Lane 070-070-170 0.16
196 Tuscaloosa Avenue 070-050-170 0.08
202 Atherton Avenue 070-040-300 0.08
N/A 070-131-010 0.00
254 Atherton Avenue 070-040-510 0.00
260 Atherton Avenue 070-032-440 0.08
223 Stockbridge Avenue 070-022-250 0.05
241 Selby Lane 059-281-010 0.05
191 Selby Lane 059-281-020 0.08
210 Park Lane 070-330-130 0.15
1 Faxon Road 070-180-170 0.19
12 Faxon Forrest Road 070-180-340 0.00
N/A 070-180-350 0.00
Source: Town of Atherton
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 232 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
103
FIGURE HE - 41: SB 9 LOT SPLITS
Source: Town of Atherton
SB 9 Nonvacant Site Analysis
A new residence built on a lot created through an SB 9 lot split can use the same setbacks, floor area ratio, building heights and other standards as provided for any existing lot in the same zoning district. This contrasts with the approach taken by several similar jurisdictions to Atherton to limit the size of units on new lots created through SB 9 to a maximum of 800 square feet.

Prior to the adoption of SB 9, the minimum lot size for a subdivision in Atherton was one acre. The Town anticipates that SB 9 applications will be more common on lots of at least one acre in size that contain an older residence. The Town has found that there are 606 lots of an acre or greater in size with a residence built before 1970.

SB 9 sites were selected based on site size and dimensions to ensure that a proposed lot split would still allow potential development to maintain adherence to the R-1A development standards on both parcels. The sites were also specifically selected to avoid historic resources and geographic barriers including liquefaction zones. The SB 9 sites are scattered throughout Atherton as shown in Figure HE – 41 above.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 233 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
104
To demonstrate that sites in Table HE -19 above can support an SB 9 lot split, four example sites (with the highest existing FAR of the parcels), have been modeled and are shown below.

FIGURE HE - 42: 1 FAXON ROAD (1.15 ACRE AND 0.55 ACRE LOTS) ATTACHMENT 1

Page 234 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
105
FIGURE HE - 43: 210 PARK LANE (1 ACRE AND 0.3 ACRE LOTS) ATTACHMENT 1

Page 235 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
106
• 449 Selby Lane: The total parcel area is approximately 1.5 acres. Figure HE-44 demonstrates this parcel’s ability to incorporate an SB-9 lot split, with arrows marking access for each newly created parcel. The parcel with the existing residence is approximately 1.4 acres (61,950 sf) and the parcel for proposed housing is approximately 0.1 acres (5,217 sf).

FIGURE HE - 44: 449 SELBY LANE (1.4 ACRE AND 0.1 ACRE LOTS) ATTACHMENT 1

Page 236 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
107
FIGURE HE - 45: 82 ISABELLA AVENUE (3.2 ACRE AND 0.5 ACRE LOTS) SB 9 Constraints Analysis
The Town website includes a fact sheet on SB 9 Urban Lot Splits.54 This includes a checklist and a reference to Chapter 17.53 of the Atherton Municipal Code, which governs SB 9 lot splits. Consistent with state law, the Town requires SB 9 lot splits to follow certain objective standards, including:
• One parcel shall not be less than 40 percent of the lot area of the original parcel • No parcel may be smaller than 1,200 square feet
54 “SB 9 Urban Lot Split”, available at https://www.ci.atherton.ca.us/640/SB-9-Urban-Lot-Split ATTACHMENT 1

Page 237 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
108
• Flag lots shall have minimum access width of 20 feet
• Setbacks must comply with underlying zoning district or be subject to state law regarding ADUs (4 -foot minimum setbacks, maximum floor area of 800 square feet, and maximum height of 16 feet)
• One parking space is required for each dwelling unit
SB 9 lot splits are subject to all impact or development fees related to the creation of a new parcel, with no unique fees. Additionally, the subsequent development of new single family dwelling unit projects on the lots are subject to all impact or development fees.

ADUs on the lots are not subject to Town impact fees. SB 9 projects are subject to ministerial review.

As there is already substantial interest in SB 9 projects, Atherton will continue to facilitate these developments and provide ministerial review to applications, as described in Program 3.811(B).

3.417 AFFH and Identified Sites
A new requirement for this 6th Cycle Housing Element is for the Site Inventory to be consistent with a jurisdiction's duty for Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH).55 HCD recommends the Site Inventory address:
• Improved Conditions
• Exacerbated Conditions
• Isolation of the RHNA
• Local Data and Knowledge
• Other Relevant Factors
In addition to the Site Inventory-specific analysis below, further information on Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing is available in Section 3.300: Atherton Fair Housing Assessment.

AFFH Site Inventory Analysis
Atherton affirmatively furthered fair housing by integrating new affordable and marketrate housing in high-resource areas throughout the city. The RHNA is distributed throughout Atherton, focusing on amenity rich areas, and has been refined based on likelihood of development and extensive local outreach. The entire city is located within a high-resource area, so market-rate housing was distributed throughout the city to 55 For more information, see HCD's April 27, 2021 document on Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing, available at https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/affh/docs/affh_document_final_4-27- 2021.pdf
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 238 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
109
support integration within the existing communities. Affordable housing was distributed on the Menlo School and Menlo College properties, areas with developer interest and development patterns conducive to support higher density housing.

In addition to the Site Inventory, there are 11 sites rezoned using the RM-10 Overlay, which allows for densities of up to 10 du/ac. These sites also introduce additional opportunities for lower income housing, multi-family housing, and housing that mitigates the high cost of land in Atherton. These sites are included in section 3.420: Analysis of Zoning that Encourages and Facilitates a Variety of Housing Types
Site Inventory and Existing Social Patterns
A complete analysis of the Site Inventory must analyze how the identified sites contribute to or mitigate fair housing issues.

Atherton’s three fair housing issues are:

A. Lack of housing that accommodates people of lower-income with a disproportionate impact on people of color, resulting in a lack of overall socioeconomic and racial diversity in the city. (High Priority) B. The predominance of single-family detached housing in the city has led to an exclusive and high-priced ownership housing market relative to San Mateo County and the Bay area overall. (High Priority)
C. High land acquisition cost. (Low Priority)
The sites in the 6th Cycle Site Inventory utilize the Multi-family Residential Overlay, which consists of parcels predominately allocated towards the City’s very low income RHNA.

This is because Pipeline Projects, Underutilized Parcels and SB 9 lot splits provide the majority of the above moderate income RHNA. The affordable allocations of the Site Inventory are wholly located on two of the Menlo College sites, and one of the Menlo School sites. All of the affordable sites are located in high-resource areas and were located based on extensive community outreach.

The Housing Element’s fair housing strategy is to increase the likelihood of development of affordable housing by incentivizing development in high resource areas on parcels that would support higher density housing. Atherton has historically restricted higher density and multi-family housing typologies within the city. The Housing Element outlines allowances for multi-family typologies within the city for the first time, enabling the development of more affordable units.

Lack of Lower-Income Housing
The Site Inventory improves integration and mitigates segregation by giving lowerincome residents the opportunity to live in a town that has historically been exclusive. The entire town is a high-resource area (even if the high resource ATTACHMENT 1

Page 239 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
110
identification is not corroborated by TCAC Opportunity Mapping). By increasing densities on select sites within the town to provide affordable housing options, new residents have access to higher-performing school districts and more green space than neighboring jurisdictions, this addresses a fair housing issue.

Diversity of Housing Types
The Site Inventory supports a diversity of housing types by increasing allowed densities. Historically, Atherton has only allowed low-density single-family residences within the town. By expanding the allowed densities on existing lots, more housing typologies are allowed to be developed, including multi-family housing typologies that are supportive of affordability.

High Land Acquisition Cost
The increased densities allowed on Site Inventory parcels supports mitigation of high land acquisition costs by distributing the cost of land among more units, lowering the cost of each individual unit, supporting affordability. SB 9 lot splits additionally distributes the high cost of land into two parcels, making each parcel cheaper than when the parcels were amalgamated.

The Site Inventory, through increased density allowances on select parcels and SB 9 lot splits, allows the high cost of land within Atherton to be broken down among multiple, more affordable lots and units rather than a more expensive single-family home.

3.418 Environmental Constraints Analysis
The analysis of environmental constraints to development of housing is provided in the discussion below.

Areas Subject to Flood Inundation in Event of Dam Failure The areas below Bear Gulch Reservoir and along Atherton Channel are subject to flooding if the Bear Gulch Dam were to fail. This dam is located within about 6,000 feet of the Cañada Fault zone and 10,500 feet of the San Andreas Fault zone.56 Residential development is precluded in the area immediately downstream from the dam by ownership by the California Water Service Company and by open space zoning and General Plan designation.

None of the sites included in the Town’s Site Inventory are in this area.

Areas Susceptible to Flooding
According to the Federal Insurance Administration, there are no areas in Atherton identified as flood prone. However, in the 1975 San Mateo County “Seismic and Safety Element” of the General Plan, a few areas in the Town of Atherton were identified as 56 County of San Mateo Geotechnical Hazard Synthesis Map ATTACHMENT 1

Page 240 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
111
being located within the 100 Year Flood Zone. The main concentration of these areas is along the Atherton Channel with other scattered sites in the area west of El Camino Real.

None of the sites included in the Town’s Site Inventory are in this area.

Areas Subject to Wildland Fire Hazard
Areas identified on the Environmental Constraints map as subject to Wildland Fire Hazard are generally west of Alameda de las Pulgas in the vicinity of Bear Gulch Reservoir and along Walsh Road and Reservoir Road. Residential building is precluded around Bear Gulch Reservoir because of its ownership by the California Water Service Company, and the open space zoning and General Plan designation. The adopted Fire Code requires all buildings exceeding 1,000 square feet be sprinklered and that roofs be constructed of fire-resistant materials. All buildings in the wildland interface must have fire sprinklers to protect the interface from a dwelling fire incident. In addition, the Menlo Park Fire Protection District inspects the area annually and recommends homeowners to clear combustible vegetation near structures.

This could ultimately impact and constrain development, but does not prevent residential construction.

Areas Subject to Seismic Activity
San Mateo County is in the vicinity of several known active and potentially active earthquake faults. These include the San Andreas and the Hayward faults.

All properties in Atherton have an equal exposure to seismic activity. This would constrain development, but does not prevent residential construction.

3.419 Infrastructure Description
Adequate infrastructure exists throughout the entire Town to accommodate the existing and planned density of development. This includes existing paved streets, sewer, water supply for domestic and fire suppression purposes and drainage facilities. Available public services include Police, Fire, Parks and Recreation, Public Works, Building Inspection and Town Administration.

All of the sites in the Town of Atherton identified as available for housing are in areas served by public sewer systems. Consequently, there are no sites identified as available for housing for any of the several income level households in areas not served by a public sewer system.

All the housing opportunity sites proposed in this Housing Element are on existing developed property connected to or adjacent to all city services. Redevelopment of these infill sites may require infrastructure improvements by the city or the developer to upgrade aging infrastructure or to increase capacity. The provision of on-site improvements, such as streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, landscaping, utility ATTACHMENT 1

Page 241 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
112
undergrounding, drainage, water, and sewer infrastructure, are standard conditions of development approval and have not been barriers to housing development in the past.

If off-site infrastructure improvements are required, these are the responsibility of the developer if the upgrade Is not currently in the Capital Improvement Program.

Per Chapter 727, Statues of 2004 (SB 1087), upon completion of an amended or adopted Housing Element, a local government is responsible for immediately distributing a copy of the element to area water and sewer providers. In addition, water and sewer providers must grant priority for service allocations to proposed developments that include housing units affordable to lower-income households. Chapter 727 was enacted to improve the effectiveness of the law in facilitating housing development for lower-income families and workers. To comply with SB 1087, upon adoption, this Housing Element will be forwarded to the Town’s Public Works Department.

Water
Water is supplied throughout the town by the Bear Gulch District of the California Water Service. Most of the water provided (93%) is purchased or imported through the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, with a remaining 7% supplied by Bear Gulch Reservoir. Cal Water’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) provides detail on available capacity and allocations for each district, with sufficient planned volume through 2045.

Planned water capacity is already sufficient to accommodate the town’s RHNA. The town also anticipates greater efficiency of water use resulting from the type of new development proposed. Atherton residences, compared to regional and state averages, use an inordinate amount of water, primarily due to landscaping. As properties are subdivided through SB 9 to create smaller lots, or new units are created with ADUs, the primary source of local water demand will not be increased. It is reasonable to project that new development of smaller units using ADUs and lot splits will serve to reduce average household water consumption. In addition, Cal Water’s management plan projects water consumption for single-family residences to decrease over time due to improved appliance standards, plumbing codes, and conservation programs.57 Wastewater
Most Atherton residents receive sewer services from West Bay Sanitary District, with a portion of the town served by the Fair Oaks Sanitation District operated by the County of San Mateo. Capacity for new development is generally analyzed on a case-by-case basis.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 242 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
113
Improvements to sewer infrastructure to accommodate development are incumbent on the developer and have not been a barrier to projects in the past.

Wastewater from future developments will be served by Silicon Valley Clean Water (SVCW) treatment facilities which has sufficient capacity to accommodate the town’s RHNA.

Dry Utilities
Development allowed under the Housing Element Update, in combination with cumulative development within PG&E’s service area would increase demand for electricity and natural gas. However, development projects would be required to comply with applicable state and local regulations pertaining to energy conservation.

PG&E routinely updates its long-range plans to incorporate potential growth in its service area. Therefore, the electrical and natural gas infrastructure would be sufficient to serve development allowed under the Sixth Cycle Housing Element.

Electricity and natural gas systems would have capacity and/or be adequate to serve cumulative development, including development allowed under this Housing Element.

Therefore, the Sixth Cycle Housing Element, in combination with past, present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the vicinity, would not contribute considerably to cumulative impacts on electricity and natural gas systems, and this cumulative impact would be less than significant.

The geographic context with respect to telecommunication service is the service areas for the telecommunication providers that serve the city. Development allowed under the Housing Element Update, in combination with cumulative development within the service areas for the telecommunication providers that serve the city would increase demand for telecommunication service. However, similar to the development provided for under the Sixth Cycle Housing Element, cumulative development of underground conduits and overhead cables to facilitate telecommunications services would be required to comply with applicable federal, state, and local standards pertaining to underground and overhead utility infrastructure.

3.420 Zoning Shortfall Analysis
HCD requires a housing element to determine whether there is sufficient land suitable and available for residential development to meet the locality’s housing need for each designated income level, or if further program actions are required to accommodate a shortfall. The following section provides a zoning shortfall analysis of the Town’s housing strategies.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 243 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
114
Existing Zoning
Atherton has four existing zoning districts. R-1A, R-1B (under the Low Density Single Family Residential general plan land use designation) and PFS (PFS land use designation), listed below, allow residential uses by right. The POS (Parks and Open Space District – under the POS land use designation) does not.
• R-1A (Residential District) – Limits land uses to single-family detached homes on minimum one-acre size lots.
• R-1B (Residential District) – Limits uses to single-family detached homes on minimum size 13,500 square foot (0.31 acre) lots.
• PFS (Public Facilities and Schools District) – Limits land uses to public and private schools including affiliated residential uses, town hall, library and other similar public and quasi- public uses without limitation on lot size. This district also permits single-family and multi-family residences pursuant to a master plan. • POS (Public Open Space District) – Allows residential units as caretake facilities for the principal uses on-site through a conditional use permit.

None of these zoning districts allow residential development at the “default” density of 20 du/ac as identified by Government Code section 65583.2(c)(3)(d)-(f)58 that would support developing units for lower-income housing.

Without existing zoning to support lower-income housing, Atherton can use its Pipeline Projects and Accessory Dwelling Units to make up some of the lower income RHNA, as shown in Table HE – 20: Current Zoning Shortfall of Lower-Income Units. but there is a shortfall of 22 units that must be accommodated. This is calculated by combining the Very Low Income RHNA (94 units) and Low Income RHNA (54) to determine a LowerIncome RHNA of 148 units. From this number, 126 units of capacity are subtracted: 2 lower-income Pipeline Projects, 124 lower-income Accessory Dwelling units, and 0 Sites with Existing Capacity. This leaves the Town with a Lower Income Shortfall of 22 units. 58 From the California Department of Housing and Community Development Default Density Standard Option – 2020 Census Update: https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/housingelement/housing-element-memos/docs/defaultdensity2020censusupdate.pdf ATTACHMENT 1

Page 244 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
115
TABLE HE – 20: CURRENT ZONING SHORTFALL OF LOWER-INCOME UNITS Lower-Income
Very Low
Income
RHNA
Low
Income
RHNA
Moderate
Income
RHNA
Above
Moderate
Income
RHNA
94 54 56 144
Very Low + Low = Lower Income RHNA 148 56 144
Current Capacity Under Existing Zoning 126 64 99
Pipeline Projects 2 2 48
ADUs 124 62 22
Sites with Existing Capacity (Underutilized Parcels) 0 0 29 Lower Income Shortfall
(Lower Income RHNA – Current Capacity Under Existing
Zoning)
22 -8 45
Source: Town of Atherton
Accommodating the Lower Income Shortfall
As part of the Housing Element, Atherton is introducing three new multi-family residential overlay zones. The overlay zones and their respective minimum and maximum allowed densities are included in Table HE - 21: Multi-Family Residential Overlay Zones below.

TABLE HE - 21: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL OVERLAY ZONES
Name
Minimum
Allowed
Density
Maximum
Allowed
Density
RM-10 1 10
RM-20 20
RM-40 40
Source: Town of Atherton
The RM-20 and RM-40 multi-family residential overlay zones will be used to make up Site Inventory, which covers the lower-income shortfall. These two zones are applied to sites in the PFS zoning district, which does not otherwise allow by-right residential uses.

Therefore, the Martinez v. City of Clovis ruling on multi-family overlay zones on lowerdensity underlying zoning does not apply.

The sites in the overlay zones will be used to make up Atherton’s current zoning shortfall of lower-income units. To accommodate this shortfall, Atherton will allow all sites in the RM-20 and RM-40 multi-family residential overlay zones to meet the housing shortfall in ATTACHMENT 1

Page 245 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
116
accordance with the Adequate Sites Program requirements of Government Code section 65583(h) and 65583.2(i). Pursuant to Gov. Code 65583(h) and 65583.2(i)), Program

3.811(C) will rezone to accommodate a minimum of 22 lower income units on a maximum of 1.1 acres (44 units at 20 du/ac). The program would require sites identified for rezoning to meet the following requirements:
• Permit owner-occupied and rental multi-family uses by-right in which 20% or more of the units are affordable to lower income households
• Permit a minimum density of 20 units per acre
• Allow a minimum of 16 units per site
• Accommodate at least 50 percent of the lower income need on sites designated for residential use only, otherwise allow 100% residential use and require residential to occupy at least 50% of the floor area in a mixed-use project.

For more information on the residential overlay zone, see the Multi-family Residential Overlay section, below.

3.421 Analysis of Zoning that Encourages and Facilitates a Variety of Housing Types Government Code Sections 65583 and 65583.2 require the housing element to provide for a variety of housing types including:
• Multi-family rental housing
• Factory-built housing and mobile homes
• Housing for agricultural employees
• Transitional and supportive housing
• Single-room occupancy units
• Emergency shelters
This section analyzes the constraints currently put on these housing types and includes a discussion of the programs included in the Sixth Cycle Housing Element to release identified constraints on the housing types.

Multi-family Rental Housing
In order to provide for multi-family rental housing, HCD requires jurisdictions to have zoned areas of at least 20 du/ac and with development standards that “allow and encourage multi-family rental housing opportunities.” Atherton does not currently have sites that allow multi-family housing of any tenure type, rental or ownership, with the exception of on PFS zoned sites as related to the primary site use. Zoning code does not typically define rental or ownership units, but HCD informally makes the distinction by looking for densities of at least 20 du/ac (above typical townhome development densities).

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 246 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
117
The Sixth Cycle Housing Element’s new multi-family residential overlay zoning districts provide for 14.4 acres of multi-family housing in the town. This includes 5.9 acres under the RM-20 and RM-40 Overlays used for the Site Inventory as well as 9.5 acres under the RM10 Overlay. Collectively, these overlays allow for a development capacity of up to 239 units, not counting any density bonuses utilized by developers.

RM-10 Overlay
The RM-10 overlay goes beyond RHNA commitments in order to include multi-family housing of up to 10 du/ac on 11 sites throughout Atherton, as shown in Figure HE - 46: RM10 Sites below. These sites are a mix of POS and R-1A zoned sites. Most are near transit and commercial areas located outside of the Town of Atherton. The new Residential Multi-family RM-10 Overlay will allow ministerial review of multi-family housing per objective design guidelines. These sites include two publicly-owned parcels (Gilmore House and Cal Water Bear Gulch Reservoir Site) and nine privately-owned parcels. None of the RM-10 overlay counts towards RHNA.

FIGURE HE - 46: RM-10 SITES
Source: Town of Atherton
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 247 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
118
The RM-10 sites have been identified through a public process that included Council analysis of potential multi-family opportunities in the town. These sites are included in Table HE - 22 RM-10 Overlay Sites below.

TABLE HE - 22: RM-10 OVERLAY SITES
Address APN Acres General
Plan
Existing
Zoning
Proposed
Zoning
Overlay
Overlay
Density
(du/ac)
Maximum
Units
197 Ravenswood 061-281-150 1 LDSFR R-1A RM-10 10 10
175 Ravenswood 061-281-060 1.1 LDSFR R-1A RM-10 10 11
185 Ravenswood 061-281-050 1.1 LDSFR R-1A RM-10 10 11
999 Ringwood 061-091-080 0.9 LDSFR R-1A RM-10 10 9
352 Bay Rd. 061-091-070 0.92 LDSFR R-1A RM-10 10 9
318 Bay Rd. 061-091-060 0.94 LDSFR R-1A RM-10 10 9
296 Bay Rd. 061-091-050 0.93 LDSFR R-1A RM-10 10 9
23 Oakwood 059-153-080 1.5 LDSFR R-1A RM-10 10 15
Gilmore House 061-310-100 0.9 POS POS RM-10 10 9
Circus Club 070-214-080 POS POS RM-10 10 0
Cal Water Site 073-192-060 0.25 POS POS RM-10 10 3
Source: Town of Atherton
Table HE - 22: RM-10 Overlay Sites includes the General Plan and zoning designations of the RM-10 overlay sites as well as the maximum number of units that would be allowed on each parcel. A narrative description of these sites follows.

R-1A Sites
Of the sites listed in Table HE - 22, the Site Inventory includes eight sites that are zoned R1A. These sites were selected by Council in a series of meetings in 2023 based on the size of the property, the age of existing residences, adjacency to neighborhoods with higher densities, and proximity to amenities such as bus transit, commercial areas, and other attractive services. All eight of these properties are currently in use as single-family residences, and any sale or transfer of the property can present an opportunity for redevelopment.

Gilmore House
The Gilmore House site is located in the northwest corner of Holbrook-Palmer Park, on Watkins Avenue near the Town Center. From 2014-2018, it was used by Atherton Police Department offices as a place to rest between shifts. From 2018 to today, it is used by the police chief as a residence. The property is owned by the Town of Atherton and in 2022 there was interest stated by some Council members to facilitate multi-family housing programs at this location. Program 3.846(A) facilitates the eventual affordable residential ATTACHMENT 1

Page 248 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
119
development of the Gilmore House site without impacting the public use of the larger Holbrook-Palmer Park.

Circus Club
The Menlo Circus Club is a privately-owned club that could potentially develop housing on its land. Although there are no current plans for such development, the property contains at least one existing caretakers’ housing unit. Application of the RM-10 overlay could eventually promote development of additional workforce housing, should Club members increase interest during the planning period.

Cal Water Bear Gulch Reservoir Site
Cal Water owns and operates 99 acres at the Bear Gulch Reservoir in Atherton. The property is located within the Town’s Park and Open Space (POS) zoning district. This district currently allows caretaker housing with a Conditional Use Permit. Due to the high cost of housing and new employee recruitment, Cal Water expressed interest in constructing up to four new affordable housing units at this site. Program 3.846(B) directs the Town to collaborate with Cal Water to remove barriers to development of the site as appropriate to facilitate housing.

Deed-Restricted ADUs
In addition to the RM-10 Overlay, Atherton is allowing missing middle housing – such as multiplexes and cottage courts – through an ADU strategy that also goes beyond RHNA commitments. Atherton adopted an ADU ordinance in 2024 which allows for an extra detached and deed restricted ADU on lots two acres or larger. Program 3.812(B) allows for an additional ADU on a property if the property owner agrees to keep rent at an affordable level. This would allow development that is similar to duplex, triplex, and cottage court development alongside and/or within a traditional single-family detached house in Atherton. This housing type, 18 of which are projected in Atherton during the planning period, could also contribute to multi-family rental housing in the town.

Mid-Cycle Check-In
The Town is committing to a mid-cycle check-in if its multi-family rental housing goals are not being met. As per Program 3.811(D), Atherton staff will review development on RM10 multi-family residential overlay sites as part of Council’s review of 2027 Annual Progress Report (March 2028). If fewer than three of the 11 sites have development or active development proposals at that time, the Town will modify its zoning mid-cycle to allow additional multifamily development. This could include:
• Identification of new sites to make up the deficiency (for example, if only two sites have development or active development proposals then the goal is deficient by one, so the Town shall identify one additional site) ATTACHMENT 1

Page 249 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
120
• A different rezoning that would allow additional housing mobility, including multifamily housing, in Atherton
If this action is necessary, City Council will adopt this mid-cycle rezoning by the end of December 2029, to be effective in January 2030.

Factory-Built Housing and Mobile Homes
As required by State law, the Town allows factory-built housing or mobile homes on permanent foundations under the same terms applicable to other single-family homes in the R-1A and R-1B zones. The Town does not have architectural review of new homes, and consequently does not impose architectural review on factory-built housing.

Housing for Agricultural Employees
There are no agricultural jobs and no farm workers living in Atherton. The closest significant location of agricultural employment is located across the Santa Cruz Mountains and at least a 30-minute drive away.

California Health and Safety Code Section 17021.5 (Employee Housing Act) requires jurisdictions to permit employee housing for six or fewer employees as a single-family use.

Employee housing shall not be included within the zoning definition of a boarding house, rooming house, hotel, dormitory, or other similar term that implies that the employee housing is a business run for-profit or differs in any other way from a family dwelling.

Jurisdictions cannot impose a conditional use permit, zoning variance, or other zoning clearance of employee housing that serves six or fewer employees that is not required of a family dwelling of the same type in the same zone.

Atherton’s Zoning Code does not currently address small employee housing. As such, Program 3.826 adds a definition and makes provisions for small employee housing as a permitted use in the R-1A and R-1B zones, where single-family is permitted.

Single-Room Occupancy Units
Single-room occupancy units are currently permitted in the PFS zones when included in an approved master plan and with a use permit. Program 3.835 modifies this language to permit single-room occupancy units as a permitted use in any residential zoning district (R-1 or the RM-10, R-20, and R-40 overlay zones).

Transitional and Supportive Housing
In June 2010, Atherton amended the zoning code to explicitly state that any use is permitted if required by State law. Under this revision, supportive and transitional housing only need to obtain the same types of permits and approvals as the same type of residential development in that zone. Residential uses, including transitional and supportive housing, are permitted without discretionary permits in the following zones; R1A and R-1B; and are permitted with a use permit in the PFS zone.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 250 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
121
Emergency Shelters
As per 17.36.030-1 in the Atherton Municipal Code, emergency shelters are a permitted use when located within the Town Civic Center property (defined as Lots 1, 2, 24, 25 and 26, Watlinton Park RSM (Resubdivision Maps) 5/8). Within this zone, shelters are permitted without a conditional use permit or other discretionary action.

The current code sets forth standards for operation in 17.36.060, covering size, beds and population, location, parking, waiting and client intake areas, handicap accessibility, onsite management, and exterior lighting. Program 3.824 directs modifications to the current code to comply with AB 139 and Government Code section 65583.

Further discussion of siting and feasibility is included in section 3.517: Constraints on Emergency Shelters.

3.430 Other Housing Resources
The Town decided to develop a Housing Impact Fee that would be utilized by the Town to encourage and support the development of affordable housing opportunities in Town, as included in Program 3.823(D). The Housing Impact Fee would be collected and segregated by law for its intended purpose. Additionally, the Town is willing to consult with other agencies such as the County of San Mateo or non-profit institutions that work in the County about additional resources that might be available to the Town for affordable housing.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 251 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
122

3.500 CONSTRAINTS ON HOUSING
This section contains analyses of potential governmental constraints contained in the Town ordinances, codes and policies that could constitute a barrier to the maintenance, improvement or development of housing for all income levels.

3.510 Governmental Constraints Analysis

3.511 Land Use Controls
The General Plan and Zoning Ordinance of a community are two primary tools for planning and regulating land use.

General Plan
The Town of Atherton updated its General Plan in 2020. The land use character of the Town has remained that of a mainly single family residential and institutional (e.g., schools) nature. The General Plan reveals that a significant constraint to housing development is land availability. There is little vacant developable land in the Town, and most of the Town’s land acreage is developed at existing General Plan densities. The lack of land use categories and associated zoning districts that permit multi-family residential development is also considered a constraint to affordable housing development in its traditional sense.

Program 3.811(C) directs amendments to the General Plan land use designations to facilitate multifamily residential development in line with the adoption of the RM-20 and RM-40 zoning overlays.

Zoning Ordinance
The Atherton Zoning Ordinance designates land uses, height, bulk, density and parking standards throughout the town. The Zoning Ordinance was designed for consistency with the General Plan. The General Plan’s four basic land use designations: Single-Family Residential, Single Family Residential Low Density, Public Facilities and Schools, and Parks and Open Space are directly reflected by the zoning districts of the R-1A (Single Family Residential one acre minimum), R-1B (Single Family Residential – 0.31 acre minimum), PFS (Public Facilities and Schools), and POS (Parks and Open Space). Table HE – 23 represents the Atherton Zoning Categories and Standards of density, setbacks, height limits, floor area ratios, lot coverage and parking requirements.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 252 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
123
TABLE HE - 23: ATHERTON’S ZONING CATEGORIES AND STANDARDS Atherton’s Zoning Categories and Standards
Zoning Density
Front
Setbacks
Side
Setbacks*
Rear
Setbacks
Height
Limit FAR
Max Lot
Coverage
Parking
Required
Arch.

Approval
R-1A
(Single Family
Residential)
1 du./ acre 60’ 50’ 60’ 30** 18% N/A None None
R-1B
(Single Family
Residential)
3 du./ac. 30’ 26’ 30’ 28’ 18% N/A None None
PFS
(Public
Facilities and
Schools)
None 60’ 75’ 75’ 34’ N/A 40% None None
POS
(Parks and
Open Space)
None 60’ Varies 60’ 34’ N/A 20% None None
*Side setbacks are on a sliding scale depending on lot size (see Table 17.38.010) ** 34’ maximum with increased setbacks and Special Structure Permit The zoning categories reflect the Town's low-density residential, large lot, single-family character. Commercial and industrial land uses are prohibited. The standards require large setbacks, limited floor area ratios and height restrictions. However, some standards are quite unrestrictive compared to other cities. For example, Atherton does not require on-site parking, nor is architectural or design review required.

New single family residential development permits are processed ministerially and most are submitted concurrently for zoning clearing to the Planning Department and building permit issuance to the Building Department which assists in greatly expediting the permitting process. Consistent with State law, the Town allows factory-built housing or mobile homes on permanent foundations under the same terms applicable to other single-family homes.

Currently multi-family residential uses are permitted in the PFS (Public Facilities and Schools) zoning district when associated with primary nonresidential use of property on the same site. Although multi-family residential, when associated with primary nonresidential use on the same site is a permitted land use, it requires location and environmental review by the Planning Commission. The location and environmental review process includes a public hearing and a review of the location, size, proximity to heritage trees and environmental aspects of the project; however, the result of the location and environmental review shall not result in the denial of the use. Program ATTACHMENT 1

Page 253 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
124

3.811(C) directs amendments to the PFS zoning district to allow multifamily housing byright. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) are permitted in both the R-1A and R-1B zoning districts. The zoning ordinance was amended in 2003 and again in 2020 to make Accessory Dwelling Units permitted by right in the R-1 districts, exempt the ADU from floor area, and for compliance with State law. An accessory dwelling unit is allowed to encroach on 20 percent of the setbacks as the main dwelling, and setbacks may be reduced to 4 feet in compliance with State law. However, such an ADU may be limited in size to that allowed by State law. Detached accessory dwelling units are generally limited to 16 feet in height and 1,200 square feet of floor area.

Attached accessory dwelling units (additional living quarters inside homes) are permitted by right in both the R-1A and R-1B zoning districts. These may include a bedroom, a bath and kitchen elements (stove, sink, and refrigerator). Accessory dwelling units are commonly constructed in Atherton (approximately 30 – 35 per year).

The Municipal Code and Ordinance provides a variety of lot sizes with densities ranging from one dwelling unit per five acres to three units per acre. Although the Town’s low allowable densities constitute a constraint to affordable housing development, the impact is offset somewhat by the relatively large proportion of homes containing accessory dwelling units. In addition, Atherton’s large homes provide opportunities for home sharing per Program 3.841. These characteristics of the local housing stock assists the Town in meeting its regional share of affordable housing. Housing associated with the underlying use (including multi-family rental housing and single room occupancy units) is permitted in the PFS (Public Facilities and Schools) Zoning District.

Constraints Posed by Current Land Use Controls
Atherton’s land use controls were designed to ensure single-family residences would be constructed on large lots. While there are several exceptional single-family homes constructed per these land use controls, the development of multi-family housing was not envisioned by the Town.

Concurrent with the housing element, Atherton is adopting objective design standards that will modify the underlying zoning so that it does not serve as a constraint on multifamily housing as per Program 3.811(C).

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 254 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
125
TABLE HE - 24: CONSTRAINTS ON MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING REMEDIED BY OBJECTIVE

DESIGN STANDARDS
Zoning District
Zoning Constraint R-1 A (existing) RM-10 RM-20 RM-40
Maximum Density 1 unit/parcel 10 unit/acre 20 unit/acre 40 unit/acre Setbacks*
Front 60’ 30’ 20’ 20’
Side 10’-50’ 15’-20’ 20’ 20’
Rear 60’ 20’ 20’ 20’
Maximum Height 30’
40’
(No limit on # of
stories)
48’
(No limit on # of
stories)
48’
(No limit on # of
stories)
FAR** 0.18 0.5 N/A N/A
Maximum Lot Coverage** 18% 40% 40% 40%
Parking Requirement N/A
Min: 1 space/bed
Max: 2 space/unit
No Min
Max: 2 space/unit
No Min
Max: 2 space/unit
Ministerial Review? No Yes Yes Yes
*Front and Rear Setbacks: ”On lots of record prior to adoption of Ordinance No. 146 (April 16, 1946) with a depth of less than two hundred feet, the front and rear yards shall each be thirty percent of the lot depth with a minimum of thirty feet; provided further, where main building heights are between thirty feet and thirty-four feet, the front and rear yards shall be increased by a ratio of five feet for each one-foot increase in height.” (17.32.040(D)(1))
Side Yard Setbacks: Minimum Side Yard requirements are dependent on lot width (Table 17.38.010-1).

Additional Setbacks: Also required if the sidewall of a building exceeds a certain height. (17.36.030(B)(1)(2)(3); 17.37.030(B)(2)(b); and 17.37.030(B)(3)(b); Required if R-1 adjacent (Table

17.36.030.B.2-1; Table 17.36.030.B.3-1; 17.37.030(B)(3)) **FAR and Lot Coverage: Lots smaller than 1 acre have FAR and Maximum/Minimum Lot Coverage determined by the following equation: Floor area in square feet = (lot size in square feet × 0.163) + 726 square feet, with a minimum allowable floor area of 2,250 square feet. (17.32.040(C)) Source: Town of Atherton

3.512 Codes and Enforcement
The latest edition of the Uniform Building Code is enforced in Atherton. The Town’s Building Department sees that new residences, additions, auxiliary structures, and the like meet all of the latest construction and safety standards. Building permits are required for any construction work. The Town has not adopted any local amendments to the State Housing Law or the Uniform Building Code. The Uniform Building Code is imposed by State law and does not pose an unusually significant constraint to housing development, maintenance or the supply and affordability of housing.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 255 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
126
The Town has instituted a code enforcement program. This is primarily a land use enforcement, complaint-based program. Typical complaints and violations relate to noise, construction activity without a Building Permit and parking of contractors’ vehicles and has not resulted in housing being deemed unfit for human habitation or vacated.

The code enforcement program does not pose a constraint to housing development, maintenance or the supply and affordability of housing.

3.513 On and Off-Site Improvement Requirements
The on and off-site improvements required for residential development in Atherton are listed below.

TABLE HE - 25: ON AND OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS
Category Improvement Required
Street Width 20 feet
Curbs and Gutters Rolled curbs and gutters required for new subdivisions Sidewalks Prohibited in new subdivisions
Water and Sewer Connections Required
Drainage Storage improvements required to prevent increased runoff during storm conditions (required by the San
Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control
Board)
Since Atherton is a completely developed urban area, all streets are paved, water mains and sewer trunks have been installed and major drainage improvements are in place.

Atherton’s improvement standards are substantially less restrictive than those imposed by many communities, which often require wider streets and additional off-site improvements. The on and off-site improvement requirements do not pose a constraint to housing development, maintenance or the supply and affordability of housing.

3.514 Fees and Exactions
Planning Fees in Atherton
Development Impact Fees are one-time charges levied on new developments and serve as tools to mitigate the impacts of new development by funding a range of capital programs required to address needs related to that development, including transportation, parks, and utilities (such as water, sewer, and storm drain). Other than a park in lieu fee under the Quimby Act for subdivisions, the Town does not currently have any impact fees; however, projects that connect to either sewer district are charged fees and construction costs that are outside of the Town’s control.In Atherton development fees are charged for both planning review and building permits. Planning fees are ATTACHMENT 1

Page 256 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
127
charged in order to recover the costs associated with the administration of the Town’s land use regulations. Planning fees for review of projects that do not require Planning Commission action (i.e., Staff level) are charged a flat fee shown in the table below. To ensure transparency of the fees charged by the Town, Program 3.849 directs Atherton to post and regularly update the Town’s website to include complete information about development fees.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 257 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
128
TABLE HE - 26: PLANNING REVIEW FEES (STAFFL LEVEL) – 2022-2023 Name Fee

PLANNING FEES
Conditional Use Permit/Special Structure
Permit
$ 2,920
Variance $ 2,920
Heritage Tree Removal Permit $ 2,245
Exception Review
Excessive Height
Lot Line Redesignation $ 2,920
Lot Line Adjustment $ 1,685
Tentative Parcel Map $ 2,920
Final Parcel Map $ 2,920
Appeal $ 842
School Master Plan $ 842
Initial Review/Negative Declaration $ 2,245
Zoning Ordinance Amendment $ 5,615
General Plan Amendment $ 5,615
Zoning Review for Home Occupation Business $107
Pre-Application Review $51
Street Easement Vacation
Code Enforcement – Administrative (Penalty) $ 1,065
Initial Review (2 reviews for fee amount;
additional reviews billed hourly) – per
application:
a. Fence $ 180
b. Accessory Structures (includes pools) $ 506
c. Accessory Buildings $ 1,067
d. Additions $ 1,095
e. New Construction $ 1,570
Revisions to Previously Approved Plans
Technology Surcharge (upgrade and maintain
development technology) (3.60% of fee) 3.60%
Planning fees for projects that require Planning Commission action consist of a nonrefundable fee and a deposit, against which professional planning staff charge to provide review services. Charges currently range from $134 to $252 per hour depending upon the level of personnel involved in the review. Unused portions of the deposit are returned to the applicant at the end of the process. The fee structure reflects the Town’s actual cost for the service. The Town reviews its fee structure and levels on a regular basis to ensure they reflect the cost of delivering services. Typical Planning Commission fees are shown in the table below
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 258 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
129
.TABLE HE - 27: PLANNING FEES (PLANNING COMMISSION) – 2022-2023 Name Fee

PLANNING FEES
Appeal $872.32
Special Structures Permit $3,025.12
Heritage Tree Removal Permit $2,325.12
Tree Protection Zone Exception $2,325.12
Variance $3,025.12
Conditional Use Permit $3,025.12
General Plan Amendment $5,817.15
Initial Review/Negative Declaration $2,325.82
Lot Line Redesignation $3,025.12
School Master Plan $872.32
Tentative Parcel Map $3,025.12
Final Parcel Map $3,025.12
Zoning Ordinance Amendment’ $5,817.15
Environmental Impact Report Actual Cost
*All Fees Include 3.6% Technology Surcharge
The Atherton planning fees are smaller than other San Mateo County jurisdictions, are consistent with similar charges in other small jurisdictions, and do not pose a significant constraint to housing development, maintenance or the supply and affordability of housing.

Building fees are charged to cover costs associated with checking that the building plans conform to requirements of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) as well as costs associated with conducting building construction inspections. Fees charged for building permits are based on the valuation of construction. The fee structure reflects the Town’s actual cost for the service. The Town reviews its fee structure and levels on a regular basis to ensure they reflect the cost of delivering services. Currently new construction valuation is determined by use of a standard factor of $350 per square foot for habitable space and $125 per square foot for non-habitable space.

The same factor is used for remodeling projects; however, the Building Department has the option to adjust the permitted value to the actual cost of the remodeling provided evidence is presented in the form of an executed contract substantiating the value. The actual building permit fee is determined using the following formula: where construction is valued over $1,000,000 the fee is calculated as $6,193.74 for the first $1,000,000 plus $4.03 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof. An additional 45% of the building permit fee is charged for plan checking. For example, where construction is valued over $1,000,000 the fee is calculated as $6,193.74 for the first $1,000,000 plus $4.03 for each ATTACHMENT 1

Page 259 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
130
additional $1,000 or fraction thereof. An additional 45% of the building permit fee is charged for plan checking.

While not imposed by the Town, local school districts charge a fee that is based on the square footage of new construction and must be paid prior to issuance of the building permits. The purpose of the fee is to compensate the school districts for the costs associated with the demand for additional services and classroom space generated by new residential construction. The Sequoia Union High School District collects the fees and distributes a portion to one of the three elementary school districts serving Atherton (i.e., Las Lomitas School District, Menlo Park City School District and Redwood City School District). Currently the Sequoia District is $3.79 per square foot of residential construction with $1.52 (40%) distributed to the Sequoia District and $2.27 (60%) distributed to the Menlo Park District, Las Lomitas or Redwood City Districts. The Town does not have any park, open space, parking or other similar development or impact fees. Nor does it have any in-lieu housing or other fees, below-market-rate housing requirements or specific land dedication requirements for streets, public utility rights-of-way, easements, parks or open space.

Cal Water’s Bear Gulch District charges a service fee for separate water service, ranging from $20,000 to $40,000. They otherwise has no connection fees for areas currently covered by the District, which covers all of Atherton.

Sewer fees are dependent on district:
• Fair Oaks:
o Single Family: $6,153 for connection + $380 development o Multi-family: $24,612 for connection + $380 for development o ADU: Charged proportionate to the burden of the ADU compared to the primary dwelling unit
• West Bay Sanitary District:
o Single Family and Multi-family: $8,501 for connection o ADU: $6,376
A recent survey by 21 Elements (see Table HE - 28 below) revealed that a 5,000 square foot house built in Atherton would have construction fees of $16,941 and no entitlement or impact fees (except for school fees, discussed above, which were excluded from the analysis). The 21 Elements Fee Survey revealed all jurisdictions in San Mateo County who responded to the survey (18 including Atherton) had development fees for single family homes that were higher than Atherton’s; some had fees 2 and 3 times higher. With fees substantially lower than those of adjacent communities, they do not pose a constraint on housing construction.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 260 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
131
Comparison to Other San Mateo County Jurisdictions
To assist jurisdictions in meeting requirements for analysis of fees and permit processing, 21 Elements released a survey to all jurisdictions in San Mateo County. The survey asked about potential government constraints to housing, including impact fees, entitlement fees, building permit fees, and permit processing times. In conjunction with that survey, 21 Elements hired Century Urban, a San Francisco based real-estate consulting firm, to examine the cost of land and labor for new housing development in the County.

Combined, those two data sets provide a basis for a preliminary examination of constraints for jurisdictions in San Mateo County.

Participation in the 21 Elements government restraints survey was excellent, with 18 of 21 jurisdictions participating. While not all the respondents answered all the questions, the high overall participation results in a meaningful look at the landscape of governmentimposed fees in San Mateo County. 21 Elements distributed the survey in November 2021 and accepted results through February 2022.

The survey asked jurisdictions to calculate fees for three hypothetical housing developments: a single-family house, a 10-unit apartment building, and a 100-unit apartment building.

Single-Family Home – Participants were asked to estimate fees for one of two, hypothetical single-family home developments:
● 2,600-square-foot house with 500-square-foot garage. The house is two stories tall with four bedrooms and two bathrooms. The house is constructed on an empty lot in an existing neighborhood and requires no significant grading or other complications.
● 5,000-square-foot house with 1,000-square-foot garage. House is two stories tall with four bedrooms and three bathrooms. The house is constructed on an empty lot in an existing neighborhood and requires no significant grading or other complications.

Atherton, along with Woodside, and Unincorporated San Mateo, chose to estimate fees for the larger house as more representative of the community. All other respondents estimated fees for the smaller house. For purposes of comparison, all the data are presented in the same table, regardless of which size hypothetical house was chosen.

Small Multi-Family – Jurisdictions were asked to estimate the fees for a hypothetical development with 10 units with moderate complexity.

Large Multi-Family – Jurisdictions were asked to estimate fees for a 100-unit development.

The Atherton fees estimated for the prototypical single-family project are shown in Table ATTACHMENT 1

Page 261 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
132
HE - 28. As shown, Town entitlement fees are significantly lower than other communities due to the streamlined and efficient development review process currently practiced.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 262 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
133
TABLE HE - 28: FEES FOR A HYPOTHETICAL SINGLE-FAMILY HOME Other Fees Total
Atherton $1,058 $15,941
Brisbane $10,032 $24,940
Burlingame $0 $69,425
Colma $0 $6,760
Daly City $0 $24,202
East Palo Alto $39,576 $104,241
Foster City $0 $67,886
Half Moon Bay $8,300 $52,569
Hillsborough $14,250 $71,092
Millbrae $0 $97,756
Pacifica $0 $33,725
Portola Valley $6,216 $52,923
Redwood City $0 $20,795
San Bruno $0 $58,209
San Mateo $0 $99,003
South San
Francisco $0 $81,366
Unincorporated
San Mateo $0 $36,429
Woodside $0 $70,957
Source: 21 Elements
The total fees per unit are compared to all San Mateo County jurisdictions below in Table HE - 29 . Atherton does not currently have fees for multi-unit developments because it has historically not allowed such developments. Program 3.816 directs the Town to adopt multi-family fees into its Master Fee Schedule by the end of March 2024.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 263 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
134
TABLE HE - 29: TOTAL FEES PER UNIT COMPARISON: SAN MATEO COUNTY JURISDICTIONS (INCLUDES ENTITLEMENT, BUILDING PERMITS, AND IMPACT FEES) Single-Family Small Multi-Unit Large Multi-Unit
Atherton $15,941 No Data No Data
Brisbane $24,940 $11,678 No Data
Burlingame $69,425 $30,345 $23,229
Colma $6,760 $167,210* $16,795
Daly City $24,202 $32,558 $12,271
East Palo Alto $104,241 No Data $28,699
Foster City $67,886 $47,179 $11,288
Half Moon Bay $52,569 $16,974 No Data
Hillsborough $71,092 No Data No Data
Millbrae $97,756 $6,824 $55,186
Pacifica $33,725 $40,151 No Data
Portola Valley $52,923 No Data No Data
Redwood City $20,795 $18,537 $62,696
San Bruno $58,209 $72,148 $39,412
San Mateo $99,003 $133,658 $44,907
South San Francisco $81,366 $76,156 $32,471
Unincorporated San Mateo $36,429 $27,978 $10,012
Woodside $70,957 $82,764 No Data
Source: 21 Elements.

Total fees as a percentage of total development costs can be found in Table HE - 30.

Atherton’s fees are calculated to be 0% of total development cost, which is among the lowest of the County.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 264 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
135
TABLE HE - 30: TOTAL FEES AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT COSTS Single-Family Small Multi-Unit Large Multi-Unit
Atherton 0% No Data No Data
Brisbane 1% 1% No Data
Burlingame 3% 4% 3%
Colma 0% 17% 2%
Daly City 1% 4% 2%
East Palo Alto 4% No Data 4%
Foster City 3% 6% 2%
Half Moon Bay 2% 2% No Data
Hillsborough 3% No Data No Data
Millbrae 2% 8% 7%
Pacifica 1% 5% No Data
Portola Valley 1% No Data No Data
Redwood City 1% 2% 8%
San Bruno 2% 8% 5%
San Mateo 4% 14% 6%
South San Francisco 3% 9% 4%
Unincorporated San Mateo 1% 3% 1%
Woodside 2% 9% No Data
Note: The above table is calculated using average soft costs (including an average of jurisdiction charged fees) and average land costs for the county. A more precise determination of fees as a percentage of total development costs can be calculated using jurisdiction specific land costs and fees.

Source: 21 Elements.

Atherton’s fees per unit, including the percentage of total development costs and a comparison to the median of fees are shown in Table HE - 31.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 265 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
136
TABLE HE - 31: SUMMARY OF ATHERTON FEES COMPARED TO MEDIAN Project Type Fees Per Unit Percentage of Total
Development Cost
Median of Fees for 21
Jurisdictions
Single Family $15,941 0% $55,566
Multi-Family in Small
Project
No data No data $36,355
Multi-Family in Large
Project
No data No data $28,699

3.515 Processing and Permit Procedures
Only two levels of residential permit processing are available: a Conditional Use Permit or a Building Permit. The Town does not have an Architectural Review and approval process.

Most residential construction, including accessory dwelling units and guest houses (estimated 90 percent to 95 percent of building permits) does not require Planning Commission action or permits. Only Planning Department review of the project for conformance with Town zoning standards and Building Department review for Building Code conformance are required. These reviews for zoning clearance by the Planning Department and permit issuance by the Building Department can be processed concurrently, allowing for a much more efficient and streamlined permitting process than may be typically found in other jurisdictions. Staff routinely provides first round plan review comments within 10-working days and follow-up comments within 5-working days.

The following table describes the Town's permit process procedures in general. These processes are required for the development of all housing for all income categories.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 266 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
137
TABLE HE - 32: RESIDENTAL PERMIT PROCESSING PROCEDURES AND TIMES Residential Permit Processing Procedures and Times
Type of Construction Use Permit Building
Permit
Plan. Commission
Public Hearing
Typical Time for Staff
Plan Check & Building
Permit Issue (weeks)
Single Family Residential X 4
Accessory Dwelling Unit X 4
Guest House X 4
Housing on PFS Sites59 X X 9
The Town does not have any overlay zones such as community plan implementation zones, hillside overlay zones or environmentally sensitive areas. The multi-family residential overlay zones that will be adopted concurrently with the housing element will ease – rather than complicate – the permitting process.

Atherton has only two residential zoning districts; R-1A where the minimum lot size is 1 acre and R-1B where the minimum lot size is 13,500 square feet. Single family detached dwelling units, second dwelling units and guest houses are permitted by right in these districts. Attached and multiple family dwelling units are not currently permitted in either district. All construction in PFS zoning districts, including attached and multiple family dwelling units and single room occupancy units require a conditional use permit. Housing in PFS zoning districts is permitted when the residential use is associated with a conditional or permitted use in that district. Such residential uses are typically associated with private schools. Housing in POS zoning districts is allowed for caretaker housing associated with the primary use on the site.

Conditional Use Permits
Where Conditional Use Permits or Special Structure Permits are required, the process involves submitting an application to the Planning Commission for review of the proposal.

Per Municipal Code Section 17.12.030, conditional use permits are only granted when the approval authority (i.e., the Planning Commission who provides approval, upon the recommendation of the Town Planner) finds that:
• The proposed use is consistent with the general plan and all applicable provisions;
59 Housing included in a private school master plan on a PFS site will be subject to a Planning Commission public hearing to review the characteristics of the project but cannot result in a denial of the housing use.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 267 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
138
• The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the use applied for will not, under the circumstances of the particular case (location, size, design, and operating characteristics), be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such use, or the general welfare of the town.

This language, as applied to residential development, acts as a constraint. Program 3.817 directs the revision of the CUP process to make certain housing development ministerial by:
• Expanding by-right uses to include housing in multifamily residential overlay zones • Removing the requirement of an advertised public hearing • Removing Planning Commission imposition on subjective restrictions on residential development
Building Permits
Building permits must be secured before commencement of any residential construction, reconstruction, conversion, alteration or addition. Approval of permit applications is based on conformity with the Uniform Building Code and the Zoning Ordinance, although the Town has the power to grant variances from the terms of the Zoning Ordinance within the limitations provided in the Ordinance.

The Building Permit process has very little impact on the development of above moderate-income housing in Atherton as evidenced by building activity and the number of replacement housing units being constructed. The Building Department currently has approximately 800 active permits and approximately 25 – 35 houses are demolished and replaced with new houses each year. While removal of the process and reduction of fees might function to reduce costs slightly, there are many other factors that act to deter development of such housing. Factors such as the high cost of land (currently at about $8 million per acre), the limitations on density and non-availability of funds (e.g., in the private educational institutions and from local public sources) are the most likely deterrents to the development of low and moderate-income housing.

As Atherton has historically not allowed multi-family housing except in particular circumstances, there are no requests to develop housing at densities below allowed density ranges that are available to analyze.

In 2023, the only year for which Atherton has data, the length of time between receiving approval for a housing development and submittal of a building permit application averaged 93 days. This is in line with the time taken in neighboring jurisdictions.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 268 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
139
Master Plans
Guidelines for master plans are included in section 17.36.050 of the Atherton Municipal Code and require that “where such master plans are prepared, they should be general enough to allow flexibility and adjustment of the facilities’ locations but shall have specific projections such as enrollment or floor space proposed. It is further requested that the schools involve interested neighbors, residents, town representatives, and others in the preparation of such master plans. Suggested content of master plans includes:

A. Land uses, their location, and extent;
B. Circulation patterns;
C. Locations for parking and parking standards;
D. Current enrollment projections and maximum enrollment anticipated; E. A list of possible facilities to be developed;
F. A schedule or priority of development;
G. Identification of historic or other unique facilities, heritage trees, and their disposition;
H. Identification of uses and their days and hours of operation, including evenings; and
I. Identification of other institutions or uses at the facility.

Where master plans have been prepared and adopted by schools, it is requested that they be filed with the office of the town planner for public record. The town planner shall report annually to the planning commission at a regular meeting on the status of school master plans, their availability, and contents. Each private school in Atherton shall report to the planning commission meeting to provide input on the status of master plan preparation and implementation. In addition, the annual meeting shall be noticed to all property owners within five hundred feet of the boundaries of the schools.” While the master plan process requirements are vague, they stand as a constraint to housing production as all multi-family housing developments on PFS zoned sites, the only sites where multi-family housing is allowed, are required to develop a master plan through the master planning process. The master planning process involves developing master plans that allow for flexibility and adjustment of locations, as well as a plan that involves “interested neighbors, residents, town representatives, and others”. All multi-family housing development projects on PFS sites are also required to be on areas highlighted by the master plan to include multi-family developments and must also be reviewed in a public hearing and location and environmental review. While the processes are themselves, and individually not to lead to a denial of multi-family projects, the inclusion of an initial master plan review period and a subsequent location and environmental review period for any planned multi-family developments extends the timeline of approval for projects and stand as timeline constraints to housing production and ATTACHMENT 1

Page 269 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
140
development. For multi-family developments on existing master plans, the process is streamlined: any development is reported in the annual report to planning commission.

There is no need for a master plan amendment.

Affordable Housing Streamlining Process (SB 35)
The Town does not have an Affordable Housing Streamlining process and all applications for affordable housing units must comply with the development review process for all other applications and developments. Additionally, the Town does not have any sites eligible for streamlined approval under SB-35.

Program 3.818 directs the development of an Affordable Housing Streamlining process compliant with Government Code section 65913.4 in such case so the Town is prepared should it be subject to SB 35 streamlining in the future.

Local Ordinances
Chapter 17.50 of the Atherton Municipal Code requires landscape screening on most development projects. Landscape screening involves the development of a landscape screening plan to be reviewed by the Town Arborist, as well as a landscape screening agreement which outlines conditions for installation and maintenance of landscape screens on the property. The requirement of the installation, maintenance, and review of a landscape screen can be considered a constraint on the timeline and cost of housing development. Program 3.819 will clarify that landscaping requirements will be revised to as to be objective and not a constraint on affordable and/or multi-family residential development (including deed-restricted ADUs).

3.516 Constraints on Persons with Disabilities
Chapter 17.17 of the Atherton Municipal Code provides for reasonable accommodation to people with disabilities and complies with the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act.

The applicant requesting a reasonable accommodation must provide (17.17.030):

A. A completed town application indicating, among other things, the applicant’s name, address, and telephone number
B. The address of the property for which the request is being made C. The current actual use of the property
D. The zoning code provision, regulation, or policy from which reasonable accommodation is being requested
E. The basis for the claim that the person(s) for whom the reasonable accommodation is sought is/are considered disabled under the Fair Housing Act and why the accommodation is reasonably necessary to make specific housing available to the person(s)
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 270 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
141
F. Such other relevant information as may be requested by the town planner or his or her designee
F is a constraint and will be removed by Program 3.822(C).

17.17.040 outlines procedures guiding Town Planning staff for how to respond to requests for modifications or exceptions to Town land use, zoning, rules, policies, and procedures that act as barriers to equal opportunity to housing. When a request for reasonable accommodation is made and “related to a physical improvement that cannot be constructed to conform to the Town’s setback or design standards”, the Town Planner must, within 30 days after receiving the request, make a written determination regarding modifications or exceptions to Town regulations, or the request must be referred to the Planning Commission.

Requested accommodations that are not “’staff-level’ in nature” are to be deferred to the planning commission via a conditional use permit process. This is a constraint, and Program 3.822 (C) directs the rewriting of the Reasonable Accommodation process to make all decisions ministerial.

Section 17.17.040 gives the applicant the opportunity to appeal, in which case a new 30- day period of Town Planner review is provided.

The application submittal materials and process require a brief written narrative describing the development standard in which an exception is requested, why the reasonable accommodation is being requested and a brief statement from the applicant’s doctor stating the person’s disability.

Chapter 17.17 also provides a process for requests for reasonable accommodation relating to increased occupancy of a group home.

The Town does not define the term “family” and does not limit the number of unrelated individuals who may reside in a residence. Group homes for six or fewer residents are allowed by right in the single-family residential districts. The Town does not have any spacing or concentration requirements. The Town has only two residential zoning districts; both of which are for single family residences. Therefore, allowances for group homes with more than six residents specifically for the disabled in other zoning districts are not necessary. The Town does not have any parking standards therefore there is no need for relaxed parking standards for persons with disabilities.

Atherton uses the 2022 California Building Code. The adopted Code does not include any amendments that might reduce the ability to accommodate persons with disabilities. Accessibility retrofits are handled through the standard permit process.

However, permits are not required unless thresholds of health, life, and safety are exceeded. The California Building Code provides an option for meeting code requirements, whereby an applicant submits an alternative “methods and means” ATTACHMENT 1

Page 271 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
142
checklist to the Building Official noting the proposed design, the conventional design, and the rationale for the request.

Given that less than 10% of the population in Atherton has a disability, which per ABAG’s Data Viewer is comparable to most of the surrounding San Mateo County jurisdictions, the current approach serves this specialized population well and does not act as a constraint towards this population.

3.517 Constraints on Emergency Shelters
There is one parcel located within the Town Civic Center property, 2.46 acres in size. The latest Point-in-Time count, in 2022, identified 3 unsheltered persons in the town. This is an increase from recent counts, which alternated between 1 person and 0 people in the biannual counts from 2011-2019.

Program 3.824(A) directs Zoning Code Section 17.36.060, which describes standards for emergency shelter operation, to be updated as follows to meet current law:

A. Size. Emergency shelters shall not exceed one thousand square feet in floor area.

Analysis: Because 500 square feet per unsheltered person is required as per Government Code section 65583(a)(4), and Atherton had 3 unsheltered persons in its last Point-in-Time count, the 1,000 square foot size limit is now a constraint. It will be removed.

B. Beds and Population. The maximum number of client beds permitted in each emergency shelter shall be three and the maximum client population permitted to be served nightly by the facility shall be three.

Analysis: Three beds is a constraint on feasibility. This limit will be increased to 15 beds allowed by-right, with more allowed with a conditional use permit.

C. Location. Each emergency shelter shall not be located within a one-thousandfoot radius of another emergency shelter.

Analysis: No modifications are necessary.

D. Parking. At least one standard size car parking space per emergency shelter bed shall be provided within fifty feet of the emergency shelter.

Analysis: Requiring parking is a constraint. This will be modified to set parking standards at “at a number sufficient to accommodate staff and not exceeding the standards for other uses in the PFS zone.”
E. Waiting and Client Intake Areas. On-site waiting and client intake areas shall be located within the emergency shelter and shall not exceed two hundred fifty square feet in floor area.

Analysis: The size limit is a constraint and will be removed.

F. Handicap Accessibility. Each emergency shelter shall be completely handicap accessible.

Analysis: No modifications are necessary.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 272 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
143
G. On-Site Management. Space for on-site management shall not exceed five hundred square feet and shall not include more than two beds.

Analysis: This section is a constraint and will be removed.

H. Exterior Lighting. All exterior lighting shall be shielded or downlit so the source of light is not visible from other properties.

Analysis: This section is a constraint and will be removed.

Siting
The 2.46-acre parcel where emergency shelters are allowed by-right are subject to a siting analysis, reviewing proximity to transit and services, hazardous conditions, habitability, and feasibility of emergency shelter construction per AB 2339 (2022). This parcel is zoned PFS, which will be modified to allow residential as part of housing element Program 3.813 Thus, the City’s parcels which allow emergency shelters as a permitted use meet the requirement under AB 2339 to also allow residential use.

Proximity to Transportation and Services
The parcel currently designated for emergency shelter use is very close (700 feet) to El Camino Real, the only road in Atherton with bus service. Although there are no services to support unsheltered persons in Atherton as of yet, the Samtrans busses on El Camino Real can connect individuals to commercial and health services in neighboring Redwood City and Menlo Park, as well as further afield.

Hazardous Conditions
The parcel was recently redeveloped, and in the course of redevelopment no hazardous conditions were identified.

Human Habitability
The parcel is home to Atherton’s city departments, post office, and library. In addition to El Camino Real 700 feet to the parcel’s south, Holbrook-Palmer Park – the largest park in Atherton – is less than a quarter-mile to the parcel’s east.

Feasibility
Atherton recently completed a site redevelopment plan for the Town Center, which began in 2014 and concluded in 2022. An emergency shelter was not part of this redevelopment, but there remains sufficient open space on the parcel for an emergency shelter of appropriate size to be developed, should the Town identify a partner organization that could support such a project.

3.520 Non-Governmental Constraints Analysis
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 273 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
144

3.521 Land Prices
Land scarcity and high real estate prices are the most significant non-governmental constraints to affordable housing in Atherton. There are virtually no vacant lots in Atherton. Property values in Atherton greatly outpace average land cost in other jurisdictions in San Mateo County. Land currently sells for approximately $8 million dollars per acre and can only be acquired by purchase of a developed parcel or by subdividing the property, which also most likely involves the removal of an existing residence. The Town believes that the high cost of land deters development opportunities for large-scale affordable housing projects. A distributed approach through the use of an ADU and JADU development and rental program (Programs 3.812 (A) and (B)) mitigates the high cost of land and will ultimately be more successful. The Town has also identified several properties for rezoning to permit multifamily housing. Figure HE – 47 below shows the radical difference in home values in Atherton that reflect the high cost of land as compared to other jurisdictions in San Mateo County and throughout the Bay Area.

FIGURE HE - 47: HOME VALUES IN ATHERTON, SAN MATEO, AND THE BAY AREA Source: Zillow
According to the California Department of Housing and Community Development AFFH Data Viewer (HCD data viewer), Atherton does not have public housing buildings.

Atherton also does not have a significant share of households using housing vouchers.

Compared to nearby Redwood City and Menlo Park, to the Town’s knowledge, the Town does not have housing stock available to renters with housing vouchers. The lack of presence of housing voucher users could indicate limited or no rental supply to house these residents.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 274 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
145
Bay Area policies are interconnected; Atherton’s land use policies that limit the parcel size and restrict multifamily development contribute to housing shortages in other areas of the county. Due to the high cost of housing, town employees and service workers are forced to other areas in search of affordable housing that is not found in the town in which they work. However, the Town is including multifamily housing as a rezoning strategy in the housing element and will introduce deed restricted ADUs to expand rental housing opportunities in Atherton.

Figure HE – 48 shows that Atherton has fewer renter-occupied households compared to San Mateo County and the Bay Area. 40% of San Mateo County households are renters compared to only 7% in Atherton. This suggests that workers who cannot afford to own homes in Atherton must rent elsewhere in the county, given the very limited numbers of rental units in Atherton. There are only 150 renter households in Atherton compared to 2,065 owner-occupied households in Atherton. These statistics do not include multi-family rental opportunities at school sites. Both numbers have stayed relatively stagnant since 2000. Renters in Atherton are young: 74% of those aged 15-24 and 88% of those aged 25- 34 are renters. Unless they benefit from familial wealth, these renters must leave the town to purchase homes. Data is from ACS 5-year data (2015-2019).

FIGURE HE - 48: OWNER AND RENTER OCCUPIED UNITS IN ATHERTON, SAN MATEO

COUNTY, AND THE BAY AREA
Source: American Community Survey 2015-2019
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 275 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
146
According to ACS data, there are no multi-family homes, boats, RVs, vans or other types of housing in Atherton. 93% (2,021) of detached single-family homes are owner-occupied and 7% (150) are renter-occupied—providing the only rental stock in Atherton. All attached single-family homes (38) and mobile homes (6) are owner-occupied. Attached single-family homes have grown by only 30 homes and single family detached homes have lost 61 units in the past decade. The California Department of Finance counts six multi family homes with two to four units built in 2020.3.522 Construction Costs Construction costs include both hard costs, such as labor and materials, and soft costs, such as architectural and engineering services, development fees and insurance. For multi-family homes in San Mateo County, hard costs account for approximately 65 percent of the building cost and soft costs average around 21 percent (the remaining 14 percent is land costs). For single family homes, hard costs often are roughly 44-59% of the total cost, soft costs are 14-17%, and land is 24-42% of the total cost60.

While multi-family construction is less relevant in most of the town, it is relevant on school facilities. According to housing developers in San Mateo County, construction costs for multi-unit buildings vary based on the form of parking (structured vs. surface) in addition to other environmental factors such as topography, pre-existing structures etc. For smaller and larger multi-unit buildings, costs can range from $672,500-$846,500 per unit61.

For a 2,600 square foot single-family home the average cost of construction is approximately $420/sf. For a more expensive, 5,000 square foot home, however, the construction costs can average $525/sf. In general, soft costs add another approximate 20-25% to the subtotal62. Such costs are not particularly higher in Atherton than in other surrounding jurisdictions.

3.523 Availability of Financing
The availability of capital to finance new residential development is a significant factor that can impact both the cost and supply of housing. Two types of capital are involved in the housing market: 1) capital used by developers for initial site preparation and construction and 2) capital for financing the purchase of units by homeowners and investors. Interest rates substantially impact home construction, purchase, and improvement costs. Fluctuation in interest rates can have a significant impact on costs for construction or purchase, as well as impact whether a potential buyer can qualify for a loan.
60Century Urban LLC, Memo to Baird + Driskell, San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties Development Cost & San Mateo Unit Mix Research, April 7, 2022. Found at
https://www.sanbruno.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/3422/Appendix-B-Housing-Development-andConstruction-Costs?bidId= 61 Ibid.
62 Ibid.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 276 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
147
Because interest rates are determined by national policies and economic conditions, there is little that local governments, including the Town, can do to affect the interest rates. In general, financing for both construction and long-term mortgages is available in San Mateo County, subject to normal underwriting standards.

Table HE – 33 summarizes the total number of home loans applied for, approved (and originated), and denied within the San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland MSA. In 2020, a total of 97,147 applications for home loans were submitted within the MSA. Of these loan applications, over 66% were approved and originated while approximately 11% of applications were denied. While there are many potential reasons for denial, this percentage of loan approvals and denials vary throughout the MSA by income group.

As anticipated, there is a direct relationship between household incomes and home loan application approvals and denials.

As depicted in Table HE - 33 as household incomes rise, the percentage of home loans denied decreases and the percentage of loans approved increases. Similarly, as household income falls, the percentage of home loan applications denied increases and the percentage of loan governs approved decreases. This data suggests it is much more difficult for lower-income households in the MSA to obtain home loan financing than higher-income households. This difficulty has the potential to directly affect the production and rehabilitation of housing units serving lower-income households, throughout the MSA.

TABLE HE – 33: DISPOSITION OF APPLICATIONS BY INCOME OF APPLICANT 2020 Income Group Total Loan
Applications
Loans Originated Applications
Denied
Percentage
Denied
<50% MFI 6,876 3,095 1,924 28%
50-79% MFI 12,351 7,792 1,793 14.5%
80-99% MFI 5,051 3,371 543 10.7%
100-119% MFI 15,158 10,462 1,502 9.9%
>120% MFI 57,710 39,177 5,059 8.8%
TOTAL 97,147 63,897 10,821 11.1%
Most homes in Atherton are custom-built homes funded by individual households.

Fluctuations in recent years due to the pandemic have caused caution among lenders and may have lasting effects on the availability of financing throughout this Housing Element planning period. Financing for this type of construction is more difficult to obtain now that banks have increased their requirements. While financing is no more of a constraint in Atherton than in other communities in the Bay Area, the availability of financing for developers under these economic conditions may pose a constraint on development outside of the Town’s control.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 277 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
148

3.600 REVIEW OF 2015-2022 HOUSING ELEMENT

PERFORMANCE

3.610 Effectiveness of the Element
This update of the Atherton housing element provides an opportunity to reflect on past achievements and challenges, identifying what is working and what is getting in the way in meeting Atherton’s housing needs. This section reviews the previous cycle’s progress in meeting RHNA, reviews the previous (5th Cycle) Housing Element programs, and discusses the implementation of those previous cycle programs.

3.620 2015-2022 RHNA Progress in Implementation
A comparison of the number of projected or planned housing units (i.e., 2015-2022 Housing Need Allocation) with what was actually achieved is summarized in Table HE – 34 below. The Town’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for the prior (2015- 2022) period was 93 units. This included 35 very low income units, 26 low income units, 29 moderate income units, and 3 above moderate income units as seen in Table HE -

34. Actual housing construction during the 2015-2022 period was 247 units.

TABLE HE - 34: PROGRESS IN IMPLEMENTATION
5th Cycle Actual RHNA Achievement
Income
Group
2015-2022
Allocation
Private
Construction
Accessory Dwelling
Unit Program
Total
Met (M),
Exceeded (E), or
Fell Short (S) of
Goal
Very Low 35 - 72 72 E
Low 26 - 22 22 S
Moderate 29 - 21 21 S
Above
Moderate 3 132 132 E
Totals 93 132 115 247 E
Note: Totals through Dec. 2021
There were a number of notable accomplishments related to implementation of the Atherton housing element over the past eight years:

ADUs (often referred to as second units or in-law units) have become increasingly popular after the Town adopted amendments to the ADU ordinance, most recently in 2020. Prominent Ordinance revisions which support this projection and increased production trend from prior years beyond those amendments as prescribed by ATTACHMENT 1

Page 278 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
149
Government Code Sections 65852.2 and 65852.22 included additional floor area exemption up to 1,200 square feet beyond the first 800 square feet and increased public education on the construction of ADUs. It is noted that throughout 2022, a total of 27 new single-family permits were issued and these permits included a total of 26 new ADUs, and 5 ADU conversions. This nearly one to one ratio is a direct correlation to the Town’s encouragement to produce ADUs. The total number of ADUs permitted and/or constructed between 2015 and 2022 (the last year with data available) was more than 115. This exceeded the Town’s RHNA allocation. This is important, not only because ADU construction is the most viable form of new housing in Atherton, but also because rental surveys of ADUs show that these kinds of units are more affordable.

These ADUs were categorized under the RHNA Income Groups of Very Low, Low, and Moderate. The 115 ADUs exceeded the Town’s RHNA allocation of these RHNA categories by 25 units (the total RHNA allocation for Very Low, Low, and Moderate groups was 90 units). Additionally, results from a recent Town-wide survey indicate significant support for the development of ADUs over the next 8 years showing a more than 200 property owner commitment to do so.

The Town approved dormitory housing consisting of 147 units or a total of 291 beds at Menlo College. Of these, 19 of the units were dedicated for low-income students with incomes at or below 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI). The new dormitory housing alleviated demand for other units from students and housed a number of students who were previously unhoused. As student housing not open to the public at large, these units do not count towards meeting RHNA.

Construction of new Above Moderate market rate housing also exceeded the Town’s RHNA allocation. A total of 9 net new Above Moderate market housing units were constructed during the 2015-2022 cycle. On the required CA Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) form the summary Table B only counts newly constructed units and does not account for demolished units. There were 132 new units constructed and 123 existing units demolished.

3.630 Review of Prior Housing Element Programs
The following summary highlights key accomplishments and challenges from the previous housing element’s planning period (2015 to 2022). This information will help ensure that the updated element for 2023 to 2031 builds on success, responds to lessons learned and positions us to better achieve our community’s housing priorities.

A more detailed program-by-program review of progress and performance is in Table HE - 35.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 279 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
150
Accomplishments
As noted in Section 3.620, ADUs have become increasingly popular after the Town adopted amendments to the ADU ordinance. Prominent Ordinance revisions support this increased production trend from prior years as prescribed by Government Code Sections 65852.2 and 65852.22. ADUs are a Town asset in accomplishing RHNA goals and providing more affordable housing units for low-income and special needs populations.

The Town’s approval of dormitory housing for Menlo College contributed to the market-rate and below market-rate units in the Town of Atherton. Not only does dormitory housing provide additional housing options for students, but it also alleviates the student-demand for other units and frees up non-dormitory housing for other Town residents.

Challenges
While the Town has several achievements, there is still work to be done. Some of the challenges that kept the Town from achieving all of its housing goals include:
• The Town does not have any commercial activity – which means there are no retail sales taxes, commercial development impact fees or other related sources of revenue available to other cities. The Town has very restricted tax revenue. This restricts the option of financial incentives or participation by the Town in building new and affordable housing.
• During the 2015-2022 Planning Period, it was anticipated that new housing would be constructed at Menlo School and Menlo College. A net of eleven new faculty units affordable to very low- and moderate-income households were planned at Menlo School and 79 new units affordable to lower income and moderate-income households were planned at Menlo College. Although the plans for these units remain on the Master Plans for these institutions there were insufficient funds available to construct them during the Planning Period.

It is recommended that this program be carried forward to the 2023-2031 Planning Period.

Ongoing Efforts
The Town continues to move forward with its goals and actions outlined in the prior cycle’s Housing Element. In addition, the trends and lessons learned from the prior cycle have been thoroughly analyzed and considered for effective incorporation in this Sixth Cycle Housing Element. These include:

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 280 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
151
• Imposition of an affordable housing impact fee on single family building permits to fund programs to assist in development and assistance for affordable housing.
• Implementation and promotion of SB 9 lot splits.
• Expansion of ADU programs through the consideration of various development and incentive programs.
• Amendment of PFS zoning to permit multi-family housing by right • Creation of a new multi–family zoning district RM 10
• Adoption of a new affordable housing Inclusionary Ordinance The following describes how the objectives and programs of the 5th Cycle Housing Element will be updated and how changes will be incorporated resulting from the evaluation.
– The program of providing new construction of Above-Moderate income units has, in the past, depended on the construction of single-family detached homes throughout the Town’s R1-A and R1-B lots. The program has been hampered by the lack of available land and the low-density character of the community. New construction invariably results in the demolition of an existing unit, leading to nearly a net zero increase in housing units. The adoption and implementation of SB 9 by the State of California is projected to allow the creation of additional lots with higher densities and thus permit the development of a greater number of Above-Moderate housing units during the 2023-31 planning period. Further, the Town will create two new multi-family zoning districts, RM 20 and RM 10 that will facilitate the development of additional above-moderate income units.

Program 3.712: New Construction of Affordable Units - The program of providing new construction of affordable units has, in the past, depended primarily on the construction of ADUs and JADUs. While the objective was met in the 2015-22 planning period, the RHNA objectives for 2023-31 is markedly higher.

Consequently the 2023-31 Update includes Housing Program 3.813 addressing multifamily housing development on school and other properties and creation of two new multifamily zoning districts, RM 20 and RM 10 that will be applied to several properties. In addition, an Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance will be adopted which requires a percentage of units to be set aside for lower-income housing. These new programs should be sufficient to meet the 2023-2031 objectives for affordable units.

Program 3.712a: Conduct Affordability Surveys - While housing affordability surveys during the 2015-22 planning period have been required as a condition of approval, ATTACHMENT 1

Page 281 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
152
they typically reflect anticipated rent, and therefore affordability, as opposed to actual affordability. Changes in the 2023-31 Update are proposed that require a survey every two years of actual rents in order to determine the actual affordability level of low and moderate income ADUs, JADUs, multifamily and other known affordable units. This change will provide data that can be used to adjust programs during the planning period, if necessary.

Program 3.712b: Faculty and Student Housing – The program of providing additional faculty and student housing on or near school campuses and there appears to be a desire on the part of the schools to construct additional faculty and student housing.

The 2023-2031 Update includes new programs such as Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance that could assist in funding construction and zoning changes such as increased height, reduction of setbacks and similar changes that could allow increased densities, all helping to reduce barriers to development of new faculty and student housing.

Program 3.712c: Maintain Contact with Affordable Housing Developers – Atherton management and planning staff have regular contact with developers of affordable housing, exchanging ideas and proposals about expanding affordable housing opportunities in Atherton. This program continues into the 2023-31 planning period in order to take advantage of affordable housing opportunities as they arise.

Program 3.713: Conservation and Rehabilitation of Existing Units -– The Atherton Planning Department works closely with the Building Department to encourage the conservation and rehabilitation of housing in Town, with particular attention to affordable housing. The Town will continue to assist the property owners and development community in the housing development, conservation and rehabilitation process. The Town will establish a building inspector ombudsman to assist property owners navigate the rehabilitation process. This program continues into the 2023-31 planning period with a projected 50 to 100 permits being issued for improvement, rehabilitation and conservation projects.

Program 3.720: Special Housing Needs
Program 3.721: Seniors – The Town has a number of programs supportive of Seniors.

These programs include permitting residential care facilities and providing information on home repairs assistance and the Property Tax Postponement Program. The Town will continue these programs and others, in support of senior populations in the 2023- 2031 Housing Element.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 282 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
153
Program 3.722: Disabled and Developmentally Delayed Persons – The Town has a number of programs supportive of persons with disabilities. These programs include, enforcing ADA compliance in new residential developments and major remodels, providing referrals and information to the County’s Housing Accessibility for Disabled Persons Program, and providing information on housing and services for persons with developmental disabilities. These programs will continue in the 2023-2031 Housing Element.

Program 3.723: Equal Housing Opportunity – The Town will continue to refer housing discrimination complaints to the appropriate groups, as well as disseminate fair housing information at Town Hall and on the Town website. The 2023-2031 Housing Element will include additional program elements that expand on the implementation of the outreach campaign, zoning code amendments, adoption of an affordable housing impact fee, increase awareness of equal housing resources for eligible population and increase the number of housing available to lower income renters/residents.

Program 3.724: Emergency Shelters, Transitional and Supportive Housing – The Town will continue to support the possibility of Emergency Shelters, Transitional Housing, and Supportive Housing in Atherton. The 2023-2031 Housing Element will also include a program expanding on the protocol in the event such housing is needed.

Program 3.730: Consistency with State Requirements
Program 3.731(a-c): Energy Conservation – The Town has regulations that encourage energy conservation. These regulations include permitting solar installations, and promoting through various public education programs, energy efficient design. The Town also requires native landscaping to the greatest extent feasible, which reduces the need for both water and energy. All of these policies and regulations will continue.

Program 3.731d: Employee Housing – The Town will continue to ensure compliance with State Health and Safety Code Sections 17021.5. Furthermore, the Town will expand on this program and the code will be revised consistent with Section 17021.6.

Program 3.740: Other Housing Programs
Program 3.741: Shared Housing – The Town will continue to support the Human Investment Program (HIP) and continue to make information available at Town Hall and on the Town website. This program will continue into the next planning cycle. The Town will include additional housing programs in the 2023-2031 Housing Element. These are reflected in Section 3.800.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 283 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
154
Cumulative Evaluation of Effectiveness of 5th Cycle Element in Addressing Special Housing Needs
The State Department of Housing and Community Development has requested that the Town “analyze the cumulative effectiveness of the previous Housing Element goals, policies, and programs on special needs populations (e.g., elderly, persons with disabilities, large households, female-headed households, farmworkers, and persons experiencing homelessness).”
Of the special needs populations, the 5th Cycle Housing Element particularly focused on seniors, who make up 22.4% of Atherton’s population. There were four programs specific to seniors (Program 3.721a-3.721d). These were related to residential care facilities, home repairs assistance, property tax postponement, and creating a senior friendly plan. The last program was not implemented due to lack of funding and interest in this type of program. The first three programs however, were implemented and are continued into the 2023-2031 Housing Element. Many older Atherton residents have been able to age in place, modify their homes, and continue living in the Town as a result of these programs and policies. Understanding how seniors might be costburdened is of particular importance due to their special housing needs, particularly for low-income seniors. Senior households often experience a combination of factors that can make accessing or keeping affordable housing a challenge. They often live on fixed incomes and are more likely to have disabilities, chronic health conditions, and/or reduced mobility. The 2023-2031 Housing Element supports diverse housing options that allow senior households to have more mobility as well as programs that support seniors in maintaining their homes.

There were three programs specific to disable and developmentally delayed persons in the 5th Cycle Housing Element (Program 3.722a-3.722c). People with disabilities can face additional housing challenges. Encompassing a broad group of individuals living with a variety of physical, cognitive, and sensory impairments, many people with disabilities live on fixed incomes and need specialized care, yet often rely on family members for assistance due to the high cost of care. The three programs were implemented and are continued into the 2023-2031 Housing Element.

In the 2022 San Mateo County One Day Homeless Count and Survey, there were 3 homeless individuals counted in Atherton, less than 1% of the Town’s population.

Atherton historically has one of the lower homeless counts in San Mateo County.

Shelters and homeless assistance programs are the main resources available to homeless residents of San Mateo County. Program 3.724a of the 5th Cycle Housing ATTACHMENT 1

Page 284 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
155
Element supports the facilitation of interested developers pursuing Emergency Shelters, Transitional Housing, and Supportive Housing in Atherton.

Large family households often have special housing needs due to a lack of adequately sized affordable housing available. In Atherton 13% of households are large households with five or more people sharing the same income. The higher costs required for homes with multiple bedrooms can result in larger families experiencing a disproportionate cost burden than the rest of the population and can increase the risk of housing insecurity.The 2023-2031 Housing Element facilitates the development of multifamily housing, as well as SB 9 lot splits and ADUs, that provide a variety of housing options for large family households.

In Atherton, 5.4% of households are female-headed households with children present (i.e., a household unit with one female head of house only, and at least one person under 18 years of age). Households headed by one person are often at greater risk of housing insecurity, particularly female-headed households, who may be supporting children or a family with only one income. Difficulty in finding affordable housing can result in disproportionate cost burden on female headed families compared to the rest of the population and can also increase the risk of housing insecurity. The 2023-2031 Housing Element includes programming that supports HIP Housing in facilitating secure housing for female-headed households.

All of these factors were considered in the evaluation of related programs from the past cycle and informed the recommendations as noted below in Section 3.640, as well as the development of new programs in Section 3.800.

The Town’s 5th Cycle Housing Element included specific goals addressing the needs of seniors, disabled persons, and homeless (emergency shelters). Cumulatively, these measures have contributed to the health, safety, and welfare of all Atherton residents and to the quality of life and condition of housing in the town. However, the 5th Cycle could have been better in including programs addressing the needs of the remaining special needs populations, including large households and female-headed households. There were the affordable housing programs (Program 3.712), one program related to Equal Housing Opportunity (Program 3.723a), and one program related to Shared Housing (Program 3.741a). The Town will expand its programs related to special needs populations in the 6th Cycle Element by doing the following:
• Expanding the programs related to Equal Housing Opportunity with eight additional programs.
• Continuing the program to support the possibility of Emergency Shelters, Transitional Housing, and Supportive Housing in Atherton from the 5th Cycle ATTACHMENT 1

Page 285 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
156
Element (Program 3.724a), and expanding the specifics of this with an additional program in the 6th Cycle Element.

3.640 Implementation Status and Analysis of 5th Cycle Housing Element Programs A detailed analysis of the goals, objectives, policies and programs of the 2015-2022 Housing Element Update is presented in Table HE - 35 below.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 286 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
157
TABLE HE - 36: ANALYSIS OF THE OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAMS CONTAINED IN THE 2015-2022 HOUSING ELEMENY UPDATE Housing Element
Program Name/Number
Program Description
and Objective
Timeframe and
Achievements
Program Evaluation
and Recommendation
Program 3.710: New Construction, Conservation, and Rehabilitation

3.711 New Construction of
Above Moderate
Units
Continue to facilitate and expedite the
development of new above
moderate-income housing units in
order to achieve the construction of
net 3 new above moderate-income
units.
(2015-21) A net of 9 new units were
constructed during this period. Although
the HCD Annual Progress Report shows 132
new units, that does not account for
demolished units. Market has limited
construction to reconstruct 1 unit for each
demolished unit.

Objective met and
exceeded.

3.712 New Construction of
Affordable Units
During the previous RHNA cycle the
Town amended the Zoning Ordinance
to remove constraints on the
development of ADUs. During the
2015-22 cycle the Zoning Ordinance
was amended to conform to new ADU
provisions in State law. Continue to
facilitate and expedite the
construction of new affordable units in
order to achieve 90 new affordable
units.
(2015-21) 115 new ADUs were constructed
during this time frame. Construction
increased as a result of zoning ordinance
changes.

Objective met and
exceeded. This program
has been effective in
providing housing for
lower income families and
individuals. Recommend
continuance.

3.712a Conduct
Affordability Surveys
This program called for housing
affordability surveys to be conducted
every two years. In lieu of conducting
surveys, the Town has chosen to
request affordability information from
each new ADU developer/owner at
the time of Building Permit issuance.
(2015-22) Affordability surveys are required
from each new ADU developer/owner at
the time of Building Permit issuance.

Objective met. This
program has been
effective in providing ADU
affordability information.

Recommend
continuance.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 287 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
158
Housing Element
Program Name/Number
Program Description
and Objective
Timeframe and
Achievements
Program Evaluation
and Recommendation

3.712b New Construction of
Affordable Faculty,
Student and Staff
Housing on Private
Schools’ Property
Work and cooperate with Menlo
School, Menlo College and Sacred
Heart Schools to facilitate
development of affordable faculty,
student and staff housing on school
properties and provide incentives for
development through an expedited
review process.
(2015-22) In 2020-21 the Town approved
dormitory housing consisting of 147 units or
a total of 291 beds at Menlo College. Of
these, 19 of the units were dedicated for
low-income students with incomes at or
less than 80% of the Area Median Income
(AMI).

Objective partially met.

This program has been
effective in providing
housing for 19 lower
income students at Menlo
College. Recommend
continuance.

3.712b
cont’d
Additional
Affordable Housing
at Oakwood
Community at
Sacred Heart Schools
The Oakwood Community at Sacred
Heart Schools is currently developed
with housing for the retired religious in a
“single room occupancy” style. These
units are all affordable to extremely
low-income households. The program
allows for expansion of the housing
should demand warrant.
(2015-22) During the prior RHNA cycle the
Town amended its Zoning Ordinance to
allow multi-family residential uses that
provide housing for very low- and lowincome households. Discretionary review is required related to the location, size,
proximity to heritage trees and
environmental aspects of the project but
may not result in the denial of the use. A
project is currently proposed at Oakwood
consisting of the addition of 5 new rooms
for permanent occupancy and 3 new
guest rooms.

Objective is being met, no
changes to Ordinance
are recommended. This
program has been
effective in providing
housing for lower income
individuals.

Recommend
continuance.

3.712b
cont’d
Faculty and Student
Housing
Annually, at the time for review of their
master plans, work with private schools
to facilitate development of
affordable, multi-family faculty,
student, and staff housing on their
properties. Achieve construction of 11
new faculty units at Menlo School, 79
new faculty and student units at Menlo
College. It is anticipated that about 1/3
(2015-22) The Town has annually worked
private schools to facilitate development
of affordable, multi-family faculty, student,
and staff housing on their properties.

During this cycle the schools were only
partially able to achieve their goals due, in
part to unavailability of funds. In 2020-21
the Town approved dormitory housing
consisting of 147 units or a total of 291 beds
Objective partially met.

Recommend that Town
continue to work with
private schools to meet
objectives.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 288 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
159
Housing Element
Program Name/Number
Program Description
and Objective
Timeframe and
Achievements
Program Evaluation
and Recommendation
of the units will be rented in the
extremely low-income category.
at Menlo College. Of these, 19 of the units
were dedicated for low-income students
with incomes at or below 80% of the Area
Median Income (AMI).

3.712c Maintain Contact
with Affordable
Housing Developers
Continue to maintain contacts with
agencies and developers of
affordable housing in the midpeninsula area in order to consult about resources that might be
available to and from the Town for
affordable housing. Contacts exist with
agencies such as the San Mateo
County Department of Housing and
Community Development, non-profit
developers such as MidPen Housing,
Bridge Housing and Habitat for
Humanity.
(2015-22) Town Staff continues to maintain
contact with agencies and developers of
affordable housing in the mid-peninsula
area. The Town offers expedited planning
and building processing through use of
contract plan checking services and
support for applications for funding.

Objective met.

3.713 Conservation and
Rehabilitation of
Existing Units
Continue to facilitate and expedite the
rehabilitation and reconstruction of
existing housing through improved
review times and project assistance.
(2015-22) Between 50 and 100 permits
issued each year for improvement,
rehabilitation and conservation of existing
units.

Objective met.

Recommend continued
implementation.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 289 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
160
Housing Element
Program Name/Number
Program Description
and Objective
Timeframe and
Achievements
Program Evaluation
and Recommendation
Program 3.720: Special Housing Needs

3.721 Seniors See Actions 3.721a through 3.721d below.

3.721a Residential Care
Facilities
Continue to facilitate the provision of
board and care opportunities,
particularly for seniors, some of whom
may be longtime Atherton residents
who can no longer remain in their
homes and who wish to continue living
in Atherton. State law provides that a
residential care facility (defined as a
facility serving six or fewer persons) is a
residential use and must be permitted
wherever residential uses are allowed,
specifically in the R-1A and R-1B zones.
(2015-22) Zoning Ordinance was
amended in 12/2010 to state that a
residential care facility is a residential use
and must be permitted wherever
residential uses are allowed, specifically in
the R-1A and R-1B zones.

Objective met.

Recommend program
continuance.

3.721b Home Repairs
Assistance
Publicize at Town Hall and in the Town’s
newsletter home repairs assistance
programs offered by Senior Centers in
the County and the County’s Home
Repair Program.
(2015-22) Handouts provided at Town Hall
publicizing repairs assistance programs
offered by Senior Centers in the County
and the County’s Home Repair Program.

Publication in Town’s newsletter was not
accomplished. Program publicized on
Town website in lieu of in newsletter.

Objective met.

Recommend program
continuance.

3.721c Property Tax
Postponement
Program
Continue to support the County’s
Property Tax Postponement Program to
support seniors in staying in their homes.

Publicize the program at Town Hall and
in the Town newsletter.
(2015-22) City Council’s declaration of
support of the County’s Property Tax
Postponement Program stated in
adopted Housing Element. Handouts
provided at Town Hall publicizing the
Objective met.

Recommend program
continuance.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 290 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
161
Housing Element
Program Name/Number
Program Description
and Objective
Timeframe and
Achievements
Program Evaluation
and Recommendation
program. Program publicized on Town
website in lieu of in newsletter.

3.721d Create Senior
Friendly Plan
The Town will create a plan to meet the
needs of the growing senior
population, which will double over the
next decade and a half. The best way
to identify the necessary changes to
ensure that Atherton is senior friendly is
to conduct a thoughtful process,
receiving input from various
stakeholders and then identifying the
policies and programs which are right
for Atherton.
(2015-22) This program was not
implemented during this cycle because of
a lack of funding. There appears to be
little interest in developing this type of
program in Atherton.

Objective not met.

Recommend abandon
program.

3.722 Disabled and
Developmentally
Delayed Persons
See Actions 3.722a through 3.722c below.

3.722a ADA Compliance Continue to review new residential developments and major remodels for
ADA compliance.
(2015-22) Building Department on-going
program.

Objective met.

Recommend program
continuance.

3.722b County Housing
Accessibility for
Disabled Persons
Program
Continue to support the program,
direct inquiries for house modifications
for the disabled to the program and
publicize the program at Town Hall and
through the Town’s newsletter.
(2015-22) City Council’s declaration of
support of the County Housing
Accessibility for Disabled Persons Program
stated in the adopted Housing Element.

Building and Planning Dept. staff directs
inquiries for house modifications for the
disabled to the program. Handouts
provided at Town Hall publicizing the
Objective met.

Recommend program
continuance.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 291 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
162
Housing Element
Program Name/Number
Program Description
and Objective
Timeframe and
Achievements
Program Evaluation
and Recommendation
program. Program publicized on Town
website in lieu of in newsletter.

3.722c Information on
Housing and Services
Available for Persons
with Developmental
Disabilities
Work with the Golden Gate regional
center to implement an outreach
program that informs families within the
city on housing and services available
for persons with developmental
disabilities. The program could include
the development of an informational
brochure, including information on
services on the City’s website, and
providing housing-related training for
individuals/families through workshops.
(2015-22) City Council’s declaration of
support for the Golden Gate regional
center to implement an outreach
program that informs families within the
City on housing and services available for
persons with developmental disabilities.

Planning Dept. staff directs inquiries for
housing and services for the
developmentally disabled to the
program. Handouts provided at Town Hall
publicizing the program. Program
publicized on Town website in lieu of in
newsletter.

Objective met.

Recommend program
continuance.

3.723a Equal Housing
Opportunity
Refer housing discrimination
complaints to Midpeninsula Citizens for
Fair Housing. Disseminate fair housing
information at various sites and through
the Town newsletter and website.
(2015-22) Planning Dept. and City
Attorney’s Office on-going program. Fair
Housing information available at Planning
Dept. and City Attorney’s office. Program
publicized on Town website in lieu of in
newsletter.

Objective met.

Recommend program
continuance.

3.724a Emergency Shelters,
Transitional and
Supportive Housing
Continue to support the possibility of
Emergency Shelters, Transitional
Housing, and Supportive Housing in
Atherton.
(2015-22) During the previous cycle the
Public Facilities and Schools zoning district
was amended to allow emergency
shelters as a non-conditional use when
located within the Town Civic Center
property.

Objective met.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 292 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
163
Housing Element
Program Name/Number
Program Description
and Objective
Timeframe and
Achievements
Program Evaluation
and Recommendation
Program 3.730: Consistency with State Requirements

3.731 Energy Conservation See Actions 3.731a through 3.731c below.

3.731a Title 24 Compliance Continue to require Title 24 compliance, and disseminate
information on other agency’s energy
conservation programs, such as
PG&E’s solar subsidy program and
energy audits.
(2015-22) Building Dept. continues to
require Title 24 compliance, and
disseminate information on other
agency’s energy conservation programs,
such as PG&E’s solar subsidy program and
energy audits.

Objective met.

Recommend program
continuance.

3.731b Green Building Continue to support Green Building in Atherton through upholding the Green
Building Ordinance.
(2015-22) Building Dept. continues to
implement and enforce the Green
Building Ordinance.

Objective met.

Recommend program
continuance.

3.731c Energy Conservation
Promotion
Continue to promote energy
conservation through energy audits,
participation in PG&E and Cal Water
programs, and encouraging
conservation retrofits.
(2015-22) Building Dept. and Public Works
Dept. continues to promote energy
conservation through energy audits,
participation in PG&E and Cal Water
programs, and encouraging conservation
retrofits.

Objective met.

Recommend program
continuance.

3.731d Employee Housing Ensure that the city is in compliance with State Health and Safety Code
Sections 17021.5, which concerns
employee housing that serves six or
fewer employees.
(2015-22) It was determined that the Town
is in compliance with State Health and
Safety Code Sections 17021.5, which
concerns employee housing that serves six
or fewer employees.

Objective met.

Program 3.740: Other Housing Programs
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 293 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
164
Housing Element
Program Name/Number
Program Description
and Objective
Timeframe and
Achievements
Program Evaluation
and Recommendation

3.741 Shared Housing

3.741a Shared Housing The Town will continue to support the Human Investment Program (HIP), a
non-profit organization that matches
people needing housing and people
owning a home who desire additional
income and/or companionship. The
Town will make information about the
Home Sharing program available at
Town Hall and will publicize the effort
through the Town’s newsletter.
(2015-22) Planning Dept. and on-going
program. HIP Home Sharing information
available at Planning Dept. Program
publicized on Town website in lieu of in
newsletter.

Objective met.

Recommend program
continuance.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 294 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
165

3.700 HOUSING GOALS, POLICIES, AND QUANTIFIED OBJECTIVES This section contains the Housing Goals, Quantified Objectives and Policies of the Town.

These goals, objectives and policies will be implemented by the Housing Programs described in Section 3.800 of this Element.

3.710 GOAL: FACILITATE THE PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT OF HOUSING TO MEET THE ABOVE

MODERATE INCOME HOUSING NEED IDENTIFIED FOR ATHERTON

3.711 OBJECTIVES
A. Realize the construction of approximately 150 net new housing units in the above-moderate income category in Atherton from 2023-2031.

3.712 POLICIES
A. Within the limitations of the private housing market the Town shall work with private developers to encourage new housing development.

3.720 GOAL: USE ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS TO MEET A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF THE TOWN’S MODERATE TO VERY LOW-INCOME HOUSING NEED.

3.721 OBJECTIVES
A.Realize the construction of 280 new accessory dwelling units planned for occupancy by moderate to extremely low-income households in Atherton from 2023-2031.

B. Partner with a non-profit organization to facilitate the rental of ADU and JADU units.

3.722 POLICIES
A. Actively promote the Accessory Dwelling Unit provision of the Atherton Zoning Ordinance by encouraging and incentivizing homeowners and developers to include attached or detached Accessory Dwelling Units in existing or new homes. This will include educating homeowners on rental alternatives and the need for ADU reporting.

3.730 GOAL: FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF FACULTY AND STUDENT HOUSING ON

SCHOOL CAMPUSES TO MEET A PORTION OF THE MODERATE AND VERY LOW-INCOME

HOUSING NEED IDENTIFIED FOR ATHERTON

3.731 OBJECTIVES
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 295 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
166
A.Encourage the construction of 96 new faculty housing units at private and public schools in the moderate to very low-income categories in Atherton from 2023-2031.

3.732 POLICIES
A.Encourage and incentivize schools in Atherton to provide affordable faculty, staff and student housing on and or near their campuses.

3.740 GOAL: FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF ADDITIONAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING AT THE

CALWATER BEAR GULCH RESERVOIR SITE AND MENLO CIRCUS CLUB SITE

3.741 OBJECTIVES
A.Encourage CalWater Company and Menlo Circus Club to develop new housing for employees on their respective sites.

3.742 POLICIES
A.Encourage the construction of 4 new housing units at the Bear Gulch Reservoir property and additional units on the Menlo Circus Club property in Atherton from 2023-2031.

3.750 GOAL: PROMOTE PRIVATE EFFORTS TO CONSERVE AND IMPROVE ATHERTON’S EXISTING HOUSING SUPPLY.

3.751 OBJECTIVES
A.Promote the improvement, maintenance and enhancement of the existing housing stock through ongoing private and public rehabilitation efforts, with the objective of processing 1,000 applications for rehabilitation and home improvement between 2023 and 2031.

3.752 POLICIES
A.The Town shall promote conservation and improvement of the condition of its existing affordable housing stock with the goal of conserving all existing affordable units.

3.760 GOAL: ENCOURAGE SPECIAL CONSIDERATION TO THE MAINTENANCE AND

EXPANSION OF HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR HANDICAPPED AND LOW AND MODERATE INCOME AND HOMELESS PERSONS.

3.761 OBJECTIVES
A.Enforce uniform building code regulations regarding provision of access for handicapped in residential structures, where applicable.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 296 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
167
B.Support the conservation and development of affordable housing for citizens of modest means.

3.762 POLICIES
A.The Town shall continue to enforce the uniform building code regulations regarding provision of handicapped access in residential structures.

B.The Town shall continue to encourage the production and availability of more affordable housing through the development of new accessory dwelling units, and private and public-school faculty and student housing.

C.The Town shall cooperate with agencies providing emergency shelter, transitional and supportive housing for the homeless and those in crisis.

3.770 GOAL: MEET THE NEEDS OF SENIORS, IN LIGHT OF THE PENDING GROWTH OF THIS POPULATION IN SAN MATEO COUNTY.

3.771 OBJECTIVES
A.Assist in meeting the needs of senior residents.

3.772 POLICIES
A.Enforce uniform building code regulations regarding provision of access for handicapped in residential structures, where applicable.

B.Support the conservation and development of affordable housing for seniors with lower incomes.

C.Process requests for accessibility accommodations.

D.Encourage policies that enable seniors to “age in place” as much as possible.

E.Continue to encourage the development of accessory dwelling units, which can provide an affordable option for seniors.

Identify and prioritize steps that Atherton can take to meet the needs of seniors.

3.780 GOAL: CONTINUE TO PROMOTE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALL PERSONS

REGARDLESS OF RACE, SEX, MARITAL STATUS, ANCESTRY, NATIONAL ORIGIN OR COLOR ATTACHMENT 1

Page 297 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
168

3.781 OBJECTIVES
A. Eliminate discrimination in housing to the extent feasible through Town actions.

3.782 POLICIES
A. The Town shall actively support housing opportunities for all persons regardless of race, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin or color.

3.790 GOAL: SUPPORT EFFORTS TO AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHER FAIR HOUSING IN ATHERTON.

3.791 POLICIES
A. Regional Housing Trust Fund or Other Regional Collaboration: Support a regional Housing Trust Fund that is funded by a diversity of jurisdictions and allocated to communities based on poverty, cost burden, and segregation. The fund could support affordable housing production, community amenities, last/first month’s security deposits, down payment assistance, etc. Pair assistance with affirmative marketing to households with disproportionate housing needs including Black and Hispanic households.

B. Promote Affordable ADUs and JADUs: Develop a program that would connect service providers that help displaced renters with ADU owners in Atherton that want to rent to low-income renters. Develop assistance programs for JADUs to make alterations easier and more cost effective so that additional units can be developed within the existing building envelope of houses and made available at more affordable rates.

C.Rental Assistance Program: The City Council will appoint a committee to convene a discussion with BIPOC (Black, Indigenous and People of Color) populations who are experiencing comparatively high rates of cost burden to discuss solutions for relief and consider rental assistance programs tailored to extremely high-cost burdened residents.

D. Promote Fair Housing Information: Update the Town’s website to include fair housing including resources for residents who feel they have experienced discrimination, information about filing fair housing complaints ATTACHMENT 1

Page 298 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
169
with HCE or HUD, and information about protected classes under the Fair Housing Act.

E. Fair Housing Training: The City Council will appoint a committee to partner with Project Sentinel (a non-profit agency in San Mateo County that have offices nearby and provide regular informational events), or another affordable housing organization, to perform fair housing training for property owners, real estate agents and tenants across the region. Focus enforcement efforts on race-based discrimination and reasonable accommodations.

F. Human Investment Program (HIP) operates a Homesharing Program in the Town. The Homesharing Program places residents seeking housing with residents open to sharing (renting) a portion of their home. Residents can contact HIP Housing to learn more about other programs as well as to discuss affordable housing opportunities in San Mateo County. Residents who apply to HIP Housing’s Home Sharing Program may work with a Home Sharing Coordinator to receive home sharing referrals, community resources, as well as ongoing information about affordable housing opportunities including waiting list opening information.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 299 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
170

3.800 HOUSING PROGRAMS
This section contains Atherton’s Quantified Objectives, Housing Programs, and efforts promoting Housing Mobility for the Planning Period 2023 – 2031.

QUANTIFIED OBJECTIVES
Table HE - 36 summarizes Atherton’s quantified objectives for the 2023-2031 Housing Element planning period. The objectives include the City’s new construction objectives to meet its regional housing needs (RHNA). The Table includes Program 3.815’s goal of rehabilitating 4 units through the planning period. As the Town currently almost entirely comprises above moderate-income housing units, these rehabilitated units are allocated to that category. Through Program 3.827: Conservation of Housing, the Town will commit to conserving the existing 5 apartment units, resident rooms, and facilities for the Oakwood Retirement Community at the Sacred Heart School. The Town is also committed to conserving 4 units for above moderate households through Program 3.831 (B) (Energy Conservation) and 8 units for low-income households through Program 3.841 (Shared Housing).

TABLE HE - 36: QUANTIFIED OBJECTIVES
Income Level New Construction
Objectives
Rehabilitation
Objectives
Conservation
Objectives
Extremely Low
(0%-30% of AMI)
47 0 0
Very Low
(30%-50% of AMI)
47 0 5
Low
(50%-80& of AMI)
54 0 8
Moderate
(80%-120% of AMI)
56 0 0
Above Moderate
(>120% of AMI)
144 4 4
Totals 348 4 17
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 300 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
171
Name of Program Objective
Program 3.810: New Construction, Conservation and Rehabilitation

3.811 (A) New Single
Family Housing
Development
Continue to facilitate and expediate the development of new singlefamily housing units.

Timeframe: Ongoing
Agency Responsible: Planning Department
Funding Sources: General Fund
Reason for Edit: No need to give a quantified objective for this category separate from the Quantified Objectives table HE-36

3.811 (B) New Single
Family Housing
Development from
SB9 Implementation
The Town adopted an SB9 ordinance consistent with State Law provisions in 2022. The Town projects approximately 48 new above moderate-income housing units to result from lot splits and new housing facilitated by SB9 (24 completed lot splits).

Atherton has already completed 6 recorded SB 9 lot splits and has 3 more currently under review. If, during Council consideration of the 2027 Annual Progress Report (March 2028) there are identified constraints on SB 9 lot splits, the Planning Department will prepare an ordinance to further incentivize lot splits with fee waivers, prioritized review, or other incentives. The ordinance will be presented to Council by September 2029 with an effective date of January 2030, if necessary.

Timeframe: Ongoing, with mid-cycle check-in late 2027 that could result in a revised ordinance presented to Council by August 2028, if applicable.

Agency Responsible: Planning Department
Funding Sources: General Fund
AFFH Metric: 24 SB 9 lot splits completed and two above-moderate units on each lot split during the planning period, for 48 new above moderate income units
Addresses AFFH Issue C: High land acquisition Cost
Reason for Edit Committing to an AFFH metric to meet HCD requirements and adding a mid-cycle check-in to support furthering the AFFH metric

3.811 (C) New MultiFamily Housing
Development
The Town will adopt RM-20, and RM-40 multifamily residential overlays that allow a maximum of 20 du/ac, and 40 du/ac, respectively. These overlays will cover sites that permit by-right multifamily development ATTACHMENT 1

Page 301 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
172
per the Objective Design Standards adopted concurrently to the overlay zones. The Town projects at least 96 multifamily housing units to be developed through this program.

The Objective Design Standards will be adopted after substantial input from the affordable housing development community as well as the Atherton community. In addition to by-right development, multifamily housing will be incentivized with:
• Prioritized development review
• Reduced fees
• Financial support from SFR Impact Fees (Program 3.823 (D)) and Inclusionary Fees (Program 3.814) for affordable housing developments
This would allow multifamily rental housing in Atherton for the first time in the Town’s history. The General Plan land use designations will be amended to facilitate multifamily residential development, as appropriate.

This program will rezone to accommodate a minimum of 22 lower income units on a maximum of 1.1 acres (22 units at 20 du/ac). The program would require sites identified for rezoning to meet the following requirements:
• Permit owner-occupied and rental multi-family uses by-right (non-discretionary) in which 20% or more of the units are affordable to lower income households
• Permit a minimum density of 20 units per acre
• Allow a minimum of 16 units per site
• Accommodate at least 50 percent of the lower income need on sites designated for residential use only, otherwise allow 100% residential use and require residential to occupy at least 50% of the floor area in a mixed-use project.

The Town will review development on RM-20/40 multi-family residential overlay sites during Council consideration of the 2027 Annual Progress Report (March 2028). If there has been no active development yet at this time, the City will develop new incentives and work closely with property owners. Revised incentives and a potential rezoning will be adopted by the end of September 2029, to be effective in January 2030.

Timeframe: Objective Design Standards are initiated and the Town is considering expanding the sites identified in the adopted housing ATTACHMENT 1

Page 302 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
173
element. The Objective Design Standards and rezoning will be adopted by the end of 2024.

Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Planning Commission, City Council, City Manager
Funding Sources: General Fund
AFFH Metric: Facilitate the development of at least 96 units at the following affordability levels on sites with RM-20 and RM-40 overlay zoning:
• Very Low Income: 57 units
• Low Income: 14 units
• Moderate Income: 25 units
• Above Moderate Income: 0 units
In addition, facilitate the development of up to 95 units of multifamily residential housing on sites with RM-10 overlay zoning.

Addresses AFFH Issue A: Lack of housing that accommodates lower income households
Addresses AFFH Issue B: Predominance of single-family housing Addresses AFFH Issue C: High land acquisition Cost
Reason for Edit:

Committing to an AFFH metric to meet HCD requirements and clarifying the connection between rezoning and Objective Design Standards

3.811(D) Mid-Cycle
Check-In
The Town will review development on RM-10 multi-family residential overlay sites during Council consideration of the 2027 Annual Progress Report (March 2028). If fewer than three of the 11 sites have development or active development proposals at that time, the Town will modify its zoning mid-cycle to allow additional multifamily development. This could include:
• Identification of new sites to make up the deficiency (for example, if only two sites have development or active
development proposals then the goal is deficient by one, so the Town shall identify one additional site)
• A different rezoning that would allow additional housing mobility, including multifamily housing, in Atherton
If this action is necessary, City Council will adopt this mid-cycle rezoning by the end of September 2029, to be effective in January 2030.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 303 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
174
Timeframe: Review of development by end of December 2026. New strategy, if necessary, to be adopted by City Council by end of December 2027, to go into effect in January 2028.

Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Planning Commission, City Council, City Manager
Funding Sources: General Fund
Reason for Inclusion: Per preliminary HCD feedback received on September 9, 2024, the Town’s RM-10 strategy requires additional monitoring and alternative actions to meet HCD requirements.

3.812 (A) New
Construction of
Affordable
Accessory Dwelling
Units
Continue to encourage the development of ADUs and approve ADUs ministerially in conformance with State Law provisions. The Town projects ADU development at a rate of 26 new ADUs per year, for a total of 280 during the planning period. The Town projects that 124 ADUs will be available to very low- and low-income households and 62 ADUs will be available to moderate income households.

The Town has not identified any constraints to ADU construction. ADU plans are approved ministerially with minimal objective design standards, the Town does not impose impact fees and, given the large size of Atherton properties, there is adequate land available to build attached and detached ADUs and JADUs. An ADU workshop is anticipated for November 2024.

The Town will take the following actions to further incentivize ADU production:
• Amend the zoning code to allow pool houses and guest
houses to be rented as ADUs (there is currently a 30-day occupancy per year limit). The Town will distribute a town wide mailer informing property owners of this change and encouraging rental of their units. (December 2024)
• Adopt a program for pre-approval of ADUs plans to
streamline the review and approval process and reduce the cost to prepare detailed plans. (June 2025)
The Town will take the following actions to further improve outreach regarding ADU construction:
• Distribute, at least annually, community outreach mailing and social media posts (Annually, first by end of 2024)
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 304 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
175
• Host at least one community workshop on new ADU
development standards during the planning period
(December 2027)
• Provide information on the Town’s website and at the Town counters on the ease of ADU development. (December 2024) • Distribute a Town-wide mailer to create an inventory of existing pool houses and guest houses. Using this inventory, the Town would work with a non-profit (HIP) to connect
homeowners to prospective renters (see program 3.812 (B):

ADU Rentals) (Distribute by March 2025, create inventory by September 2025 and initiate collaboration by December
2025)
The Town will monitor permitted ADUs and affordability every six months to one year (first year of monitoring is 2025) and take appropriate action, including adjusting assumptions or rezoning within one year if the sites inventory is negatively impacted to ensure compliance with no net loss provisions. ADU data will be provided to Council annually as part of the Annual Progress Report.

Timeframe: As per bullets in lists above
Agency Responsible: Planning Department
Funding Source: General Fund
AFFH Metric: Development of 208 ADUs by the end of the planning period. Outreach goals include: 7 mailers, 1 workshop, 1 complete inventory of pool and guest houses
Addresses AFFH Issue A: Lack of housing that accommodates lower income households
Addresses AFFH Issue B: Predominance of single-family housing Reason for Edit:

Committing to an AFFH metric to meet HCD requirements; Providing more detail to HCD on steps and timing to incentivize ADUs and provide additional outreach; Bringing in previous Program 3.845 to improve ease of implementation of program (no two separate programs on same issue)

3.812 (B) Affordable
ADU Rentals
The Town will take the following actions to further incentivize belowmarket-rate rentals of ADUs:
• The Town will continue to request the owner fill out an ADU rental survey indicating the amount of rent to be charged for the unit at the time of construction or conversion. By
comparing this rent to the San Mateo County monthly
maximum affordable housing cost by household chart, the affordability level of each unit is determined.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 305 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
176
• To encourage rental of ADUs and JADUs, the Town will
develop a comprehensive incentive ADU/JADU rental
program and partner with a non-profit organization (HIP) to facilitate the rental advertising, screening and partnering process.

Amend the zoning code to allow two ADUs to be constructed on a property if the second ADU is deed-restricted to a lower-income household for at least 10 years, depending on availability. The deedrestricted ADU would be exempt from ADU floor-area limitations, and could be a detached unit or attached to the principal dwelling, a garage, or another ADU. This would only be applicable on lots that are 2 acres or larger.

AFFH Metric: Development of 186 affordable ADUs by the end of the planning period.

Addresses AFFH Issue A: Lack of housing that accommodates lower income households
Addresses AFFH Issue B: Predominance of single-family housing Reason for Inclusion: Furthering support for affordable ADU units and committing to an AFFH metric to meet HCD requirements

3.813 CEQA Analysis
on Multifamily
Housing
Development on
School Properties
Per Program 3.811(C), amend the PFS zoning district to permit new multifamily housing by right for 40 du/ac and 20 du/ac at four school sites, subject to objective design standards. This will support the construction of 96 new affordable multifamily units at private and public schools in the very low- to moderate-income category.

Complete the CEQA analysis and adopt the Zoning amendment within one year of Housing Element certification.

Timeframe: Initiated. Rezoning will be complete by July 2025.

Agency Responsible: Planning Department
Funding Source: General Fund
AFFH Metric: Construction of 93 new affordable multifamily units.

Addresses AFFH Issue A: Lack of housing that accommodates lower income households
Addresses AFFH Issue B: Predominance of single-family housing Reason for Edit: Updating Site Inventory numbers and committing them to an AFFH metric to meet HCD requirements
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 306 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
177

3.814 Adoption of an
Inclusionary Zoning
Ordinance
Adopt a new inclusionary ordinance for multifamily development and a housing fee for all new single-family housing construction and addition. Generate funds to support an affordable ADU rental program (Program 3.812 (B)) and other affordable housing opportunities.

The Town is currently completing a nexus study that will inform the development of the zoning ordinance. The nexus study will ensure that a 20% affordable requirement is not a constraint, and propose a revised percentage if 20% is determined to be a constraint or if a higher percentage of inclusionary units is feasible.

Timeframe: Nexus study to be completed by September 2024, with ordinance adopted by July 2025
Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Planning Commission, City Council, City Manager
Funding Source: General Fund
AFFH Metric: Adopted inclusionary ordinance
Addresses AFFH Issue A: Lack of housing that accommodates lower income households
Reason for Edit: Connecting program to ongoing work on nexus study, which contributes to AFFH goals

3.815 Conservation
and Rehabilitation of
Existing Units
Continue to facilitate and expedite the rehabilitation and reconstruction of existing residential units. The Town will establish a building inspector ombudsman to assist property owners navigate the rehabilitation process.

The Town will continue to provide information on San Mateo County’s Home Repair Program to assist low and moderate homeowners in rehabilitating their residences at Town Hall. The Town will publicize the availability of these services on the Town website.

The Town will conduct proactive yearly outreach in the form of a survey to determine what bottlenecks, common questions and/or difficulties arise during the rehabilitation process. This will refine the process for property owners attempting to rehabilitate their housing.

The outreach will also be used to increase awareness of the available incentives
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 307 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
178
Timeframe: Ombudsman role established by December 2024; Information at Town Hall and website by December 2024; Outreach annual, first survey by March 2025.

Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Building Department Funding Source: General Fund
AFFH Metric: 4 rehabilitated units through the planning period Addresses AFFH Issue A: Lack of housing that accommodates lower income households
Reason for Edit: Additional outreach commitments to support more rehabilitation and committing to an AFFH metric to meet HCD requirements

3.816 Multi-Family
Residential Fees
The Town will revise its Master Fee Schedule with multifamily development fees that do not pose a constraint on multifamily development.

Conduct mid-cycle review on fees by end of December 2027, reducing fees if they have proven to be a constraint on multifamily development.

Timeframe: Revised fee schedule by end of 2024, concurrent with Objective Design Standards. Mid-cycle review by December 2027.

Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Building Department Funding Source: General Fund
Reason for Inclusion: Fee schedule to give clarity to multifamily development required alongside multifamily zoning

3.817 Conditional
Use Permits
The Town will revise Municipal Code Section 17.12 to make certain housing development ministerial:
• Expand by-right uses to include housing in multifamily residential overlay zone areas
• Remove requirement of an advertised public hearing.

Instead, a courtesy notice will be provided to properties within 500 feet of the subject property.
• Remove Planning Commission potential imposition of “such reasonable conditions or restrictions, including, but not limited to, time limits, review of performance, and performance standards, as it deems necessary to secure the purpose of this title and to assure operation of the use or the construction of improvements in manner compatible with existing and
potential uses of adjoining properties and in the general vicinity, and may require guarantees and evidence that such conditions are being or will be complied with.”
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 308 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
179
Timeframe: Rezoning will be complete by July 2025
Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Planning Commission, City Council
Funding Source: General Fund
Reason for Inclusion: HCD requirement to aid clarity in housing development process

3.818 Streamlined
Project Review (SB
35)
The Town will streamline project review by developing written procedures for SB 35 applications so the City is prepared should it be subject to SB 35 streamlining in the future.

Timeframe: Establish procedures by July 2025
Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Planning Commission, City Council
Funding Source: General Fund
AFFH Metric: Amended ordinance, including written SB 35 procedures Addresses AFFH Issue A: Lack of housing that accommodates lower income households
Reason for Inclusion: HCD requirement to aid clarity in housing development process

3.819 Landscape
Screening
The Town will revise its zoning code to revise its landscaping requirements so that they are objective and not a constraint on affordable and/or multifamily residential development (including deed-restricted ADUs).

Timeframe: Revise zoning code by end of 2024
Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Planning Commission, City Council
Funding Source: General Fund
Reason for Inclusion: HCD requirement to aid clarity in housing development process Program 3.820: Special Needs Housing

3.821 (A) Special
Needs Housing -
Seniors
Continue to facilitate the provision of board and care opportunities, particularly for seniors, some of whom may be longtime Atherton residents who can no longer remain in their homes and who wish to continue living in Atherton. State law provides that a residential care facility (defined as a facility serving six or fewer persons) is a residential use and must be permitted wherever residential uses are allowed.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 309 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
180
Timeframe: Ongoing. The Town amended its Zoning Ordinance in 2010 to comply with State residential care facility zoning requirements.

Agency Responsible: Planning Department
Funding Source: General Fund

3.821 (B) Special
Needs Housing -
Seniors
The Town will continue to provide information at Town Hall regarding the numerous Senior Centers in San Mateo County that offer assistance in home repairs. The Town will publicize the availability of these services on the Town website. Information on San Mateo County’s Home Repair Program (see Program 3.821 (D)) will also be provided at Town Hall and on the Town website.

Timeframe: Ongoing. Information on County program will be provided by end of 2024.

Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Building Department Funding Source: General Fund
AFFH Metric: 4 rehabilitated units through the planning period Addresses AFFH Issue A: Lack of housing that accommodates lower income households
Reason for Edit: Additional outreach commitments to support more rehabilitation and committing to an AFFH metric to meet HCD requirements.

3.821 (C) Special
Needs Housing -
Seniors
The Town will continue to support the County Property Tax Postponement Program, which provides seniors with a means of postponing property tax payment. Inquiries will be directed to the County Tax Collector’s Office and information regarding the program will be available at Town Hall and publicized on the Town’s website.

Timeframe: Ongoing
Agency Responsible: Planning Department
Funding Source: General Fund

3.821 (D) Special
Needs Housing -
Seniors
The Town will host a Senior Workshop to educate the community on available resources and identify housing opportunities. Information on home repair and retrofit for accessibility resources and programs, home sharing opportunity, financial assistance, and the ADU program will be presented.

Timeframe: Conduct first Senior Workshop by end of 2025, second by end of 2029
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 310 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
181
Agency Responsible: Planning Department, City Manager
Funding Source: General Fund

3.822 (A) Disabled
and
Developmentally
Delayed Persons
Continue to review new residential developments and major remodels for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Timeframe: Ongoing
Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Building Department Funding Source: General Fund

3.822 (B) Disabled
and
Developmentally
Delayed Persons
Continue to support the County Housing Accessibility for Disabled Persons program at the Center for the Independence of the Disabled.

The Town will direct inquiries for house modifications for the disabled to the County program to identify housing opportunities. Public information regarding the program will be available at Town Hall and publicized on the Town’s website.

Timeframe: Ongoing
Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Building Department Funding Source: General Fund

3.822 (C) Disabled
and
Developmentally
Delayed Persons
The Town will continue to process requests for housing accessibility accommodations. The Town’s municipal code provides a process for individuals with disabilities to make requests for reasonable accommodation for relief from the various land use, zoning, or rules, policies, practices, and/or procedures of the town that may be necessary to ensure equal access to housing.

The Town will update the Town’s reasonable accommodation procedures to be compliant with State law, including:
• Removing 17.17.030(F), requiring “such other relevant information as may be requested by the town planner or his or her designee”
• Removing 17.17.040’s requirement, “making all decisions...” to make all decisions ministerial
Timeframe: Revise zoning code by end of 2024
Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Building Department, Planning Commission, City Council
Funding Source: General Fund
Reason for Edit: Meeting State and HCD Requirements
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 311 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
182

3.822 (D) Disabled
and
Developmentally
Delayed Persons
Conduct annual outreach to the community through direct mailers and social media posting to inform the community on programs including the HIP homesharing program, organizations that provide home retrofits for accessibility, Meals on Wheels and senior in-home care providers in order to identify housing opportunities.

Timeframe: Initiated in 2023. The Town included information regarding the HIP homesharing programming in regular social media posts and on the Planning website. Additionally, the Town hosted an event to connect potential homesharers with individuals looking for housing.

Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Planning Commission, City Council, City Manager
Funding Source: General Fund

3.822 (E) Special
Needs Housing
The Town will assist in the development of housing for all special needs households (e.g., elderly, homeless, farmworkers, persons with disabilities, female-headed households).

Developments that include housing for special needs households will be eligible for:
• Reduced Town fees
• Town assistance in supporting funding applications
In addition, the Town will conduct annual outreach to identify housing opportunities with special needs communities, local non-profit service providers, and special needs housing developers. Outreach will include a debriefing memo that will identify potential modifications and expansions as necessary to facilitate development of a variety of housing types that support special needs households.

Timeframe: Reduce fees and initiate Town assistance by end of 2024.

Initiate annual outreach by July 2025
Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Planning Commission, City Council, City Manager
Funding Source: General Fund
AFFH Metric: One special needs housing development constructed during planning period
Addresses AFFH Issue A: Lack of housing that accommodates lower income households
Addresses AFFH Issue B: Predominance of single-family housing ATTACHMENT 1

Page 312 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
183
Reason for Inclusion: Meeting HCD requirements to support special needs housing and committing to an AFFH metric

3.822 (F) Extremely
Low Income
Households
The Town will facilitate housing for extremely low income households through its robust ADU development (Program 3.812 (A)) and multifamily residential overlay zone (Program 3.811 (C)) programs.

Multifamily housing developments that include housing for extremely low income units will be uniquely able to access the following incentives:
• Waivers of Town fees
• Modified development standards and concessions as
necessary to facilitate extremely low income housing
• Town assistance in supporting funding applications
In addition, the Town will conduct annual outreach with non-profits serving extremely-low income households and local affordable housing developers to identify housing opportunities. Outreach will include a debriefing memo that will identify potential modifications and expansions to incentives as necessary to facilitate development of lower income units.

Timeframe: Reduce fees and initiate Town assistance by end of 2024.

Initiate annual outreach by July 2025
Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Planning Commission, City Council, City Manager
Funding Source: General Fund
AFFH Metric: One extremely-low income housing development constructed during planning period
Addresses AFFH Issue A: Lack of housing that accommodates lower income households
Addresses AFFH Issue B: Predominance of single-family housing Reason for Inclusion: Meeting HCD requirements to facilitate development of housing for extremely low income households

3.823 (A) Equal
Housing Opportunity
Refer complaints of discrimination in housing access based on race, religion, national origin, age, sex, marital status or physical handicap, and other arbitrary barriers that prevent choice of housing to groups such as Project Sentinel. The Town will disseminate fair housing information at Town Hall. In addition, fair housing information will be published on the Town website.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 313 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
184
Timeframe: Ongoing
Agency Responsible: Planning Department
Funding Source: General Fund

3.823 (B) Equal
Housing Opportunity
Develop and implement an education/outreach campaign
targeting landlords/managers on renting to people with Housing Choice Vouchers.

Timeframe: Ongoing
Agency Responsible: Planning Department
Funding Source: General Fund

3.823 (C) Equal
Housing Opportunity
Amend the Zoning title to eliminate the occupancy limitation on other accessory structures, such as guest houses and pool houses and create an inventory of existing pool houses and guest houses. The Town will work with a nonprofit to connect homeowners to prospective renters.

Timeframe: Amend zoning by end of 2024; Initial inventory is complete and will be augmented by survey described in Program 3.812 (B); Initiate collaboration by December 2025
Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Planning Commission, City Council, City Manager
Funding Source: General Fund
AFFH Metric: Contribute to development of 171 ADUs by the end of the planning period. Outreach goals include: 7 mailers, 1 workshop, 1 complete inventory of pool and guest houses
Addresses AFFH Issue A: Lack of housing that accommodates lower income households
Addresses AFFH Issue B: Predominance of single-family housing Reason for Edit: Clarifying connection to Program 3.812, meeting HCD requirements to commit to AFFH metric

3.823 (D) Equal
Housing Opportunity
Adopt an affordable housing impact fee on single family construction. The Town will make available funds from this program to provide very low-income rental assistance for eligible households identified by HIP.

Timeframe: Complete as part of nexus study described in Program

3.814, by end of July 2025
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 314 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
185
Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Planning Commission, City Council, City Manager
Funding Source: General Fund

3.823 (E) Equal
Housing Opportunity
Provide additional fair housing resources and training for property owners, real estate agents, and tenants in collaboration with other cities and towns, Project Sentinel, or other similar organization. So long as it does not serve as a constraint on housing development mandate training for multi-family developers, property owners and any resident renting an ADU or similar unit.

Timeframe: Additional resources and training to be initiated by end of December 2025
Agency Responsible: Planning Department
Funding Source: General Fund
Reason for Edit: Clarifying that the training requirement is not intended to be a constraint on housing

3.823 (F) Equal
Housing Opportunity
Create a webpage to host Equal Housing Opportunity information and improve awareness around fair housing training, issues and available programs. The webpage will also provide information on filing fair housing complaints with HCD or HUD.

Timeframe: Create website by end of 2025
Agency Responsible: Planning Department
Funding Source: General Fund

3.823 (G) Equal
Housing Opportunity
Affirmatively market low-income units to households that are underrepresented in the Town in comparison to neighboring jurisdictions.

Timeframe: Begin marketing by end of 2024
Agency Responsible: Planning Department
Funding Source: General Fund

3.824(A) Emergency
Shelters, Transitional
and Supportive
Housing
Continue to support the possibility of Emergency Shelters, Transitional Housing, and Supportive Housing in Atherton. Emergency shelters are a permitted use on the Town Civic Center Property.

The Town will amend its zoning code to comply with all provisions of State law pertaining to emergency shelters. Specifically, the Town will:
• Permit shelters without discretionary action
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 315 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
186
• Analyze all development standards and address any
constraints, including those on spacing and shelter size • Amend its code to ensure compliance with parking
requirements of AB139/Government Code section 65583,
subdivision (a)(4)(A).
• Amend its code to revise definition of emergency shelters to “housing with minimal supportive services for homeless
persons that is limited to occupancy of six months or less by a homeless person. No individual or household may be denied emergency shelter because of an inability to pay.”
Timeframe: Ongoing, the Town continues to permit emergency shelters as a use on the Town Civic Center Property; zoning code amendments to be completed by end of 2024
Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Planning Commission, City Council, City Manager, Building Department
Funding Source: General Fund
Reason for Inclusion: Meeting HCD requirements

3.824(B) Emergency
Shelters, Transitional
and Supportive
Housing
• In the event emergency shelters, transitional and supportive housing are needed, the Town will follow its Standards for Emergency Shelter Operation which reflect the State of
California’s minimum requirements. See 3.517 of this Housing Element to review available site, how constraints are to be modified to ensure its availability/usability, and its proximity to transportation and services.

Timeframe: Ongoing and as appropriate
Agency Responsible: Planning Department, City Manager, Building Department
Funding Source: General Fund
Reason for Inclusion: Meeting HCD requirements

3.825 Group Homes
for Persons with
Disabilities
The Town will revise the zoning code to allow group homes for seven or more residents, specifically for people with disabilities, as a permitted use in any district where residential uses are permitted. Such homes will have objective development standards that are similar to other residential uses in the same zone.

Timeframe: Revise zoning code by end of 2024
Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Planning Commission, City Council
Funding Source: General Fund
Reason for Inclusion: Meeting HCD requirements
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 316 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
187

3.826 Employee
Housing
The Town will amend its zoning code to allow for employee housing as provided for under the Employee Housing Act. Specifically, consistent with Section 17021.5, employee housing for six or fewer employees will be treated as a single-family structure and permitted in the same manner as other dwellings of the same type in the same zone. In addition, the code will be revised consistent with Section 17021.6, which requires that employee housing consisting of no more than 12 units or 36 beds be permitted in the same manner as other agricultural uses in the same zone.

Timeframe: Revise zoning code by end of 2024
Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Planning Commission, City Council
Funding Source: General Fund
Reason for Inclusion: Meeting HCD requirements

3.827 Conservation
of Housing
The Town will work with the Religious of the Sacred Heart of Jesus at the Sacred Heart School site to conserve the existing 5 apartment units, resident rooms, and facilities for the Oakwood Retirement Community in the case of eventual development per Program

3.811(C). These units are counted as conserved Very Low Income housing units in the Town’s Quantified Objectives.

Timeframe: Outreach to Sacred Heart will begin in early 2025, and conservation efforts will occur concurrent with any development plans on the Sacred Heart site.

Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Planning Commission, City Council, City Manager
Funding Sources: General Fund
AFFH Metric: Facilitate the conservation of 5 apartment units on the Sacred Heart site.

Addresses AFFH Issue A: Lack of housing that accommodates lower income households
Addresses AFFH Issue B: Predominance of single-family housing Addresses AFFH Issue C: High land acquisition cost
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 317 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
188
Reason for Inclusion: Per preliminary HCD feedback received on September 9, 2024, committing to conservation of housing over the course of the planning period and resolving a potential constraint on any development on a site.

Program 3.830: Consistency with State Requirements

3.831(A) Energy
Conservation
Continue to require compliance with Title 24 of the State’s Building regulations. In addition, disseminate energy conservation information available from other agencies, such as PG&E’s solar subsidy program and energy audits.

Timeframe: Ongoing. The Town requires Title 24 compliance and provides information on energy conservation on its website.

Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Building Department Funding Source: General Fund

3.831 (B) Energy
Conservation
Continue to support Green Building in Atherton through enforcing the Green Building Ordinance and promote the Town’s Green Building Guide, “Go Green and Save: Rebates for Atherton Residents” and “Clean Energy & Energy Efficiency” programs posted on the website for all new residential development.

Timeframe: Ongoing. The Town continues to support and promote its Green Building programs through community outreach, events, and its website.

Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Building Department Funding Source: General Fund
AFFH Metric: Conserve 4 above-moderate units through energy saving initiatives.

Addresses AFFH Issue C: High land acquisition cost

3.831 (C) Energy
Conservation
Continue to promote energy conservation through energy audits, participation in PG&E and Cal Water programs and encouraging energy conserving retrofits in homes.

Timeframe: Ongoing. The Town promotes this program through community outreach, information provided in Town Hall and the Town's website.

Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Building Department Funding Source: General Fund
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 318 of 433 ends

Town of Atherton 2023-2031 Housing Element – DRAFT
October 2024
189

3.832 (A)
Consistency with
Other General Plan
Elements and
Community Goals
Continue to conduct a review and analysis of the General Plan’s compliance with the adopted Office of Planning and Research Guidelines as part of the annual General Plan implementation report required by Government Code Section 65400.

Timeframe: Ongoing. The Town will conduct its first annual review by the end of 2024.

Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Building Department Funding Source: General Fund

3.832 (B) Consistency
with Other General
Plan Elements and
Community Goals
Conduct an internal consistency review and analysis of the General Plan, including the Housing Element as part of the annual General Plan implementation report required by Government Code Section 65400.

Timeframe: Ongoing. The Town will conduct its first annual review by the end of 2024.

Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Building Department Funding Source: General Fund

3.833 Replacement
Housing
Requirements
The Town will require replacement housing for lower-income units (Gov.Code, § 65583.2, subd. (g)(3).) with the same requirements as set forth in Government Code section 65915, subdivision (c), paragraph (3).

Timeframe: Ongoing. The Town does not currently have restricted lower-income units subject to this program.

Agency Responsible: Planning Department
Funding Source: General Fund
Reason for Inclusion: Meeting State and HCD requirements

3.834 Single-Room
Occupancy
The Town will revise its zoning code to ensure single-room occupancy units are a permitted use in any residential zoning district (R-1 or the RM-10, R-20, and R-40 overlay zones).

Timeframe: Revise zoning code by end of 2024
Agency Responsible: Planning Department, Planning Commission, City Council
Funding Source: General Fund
Reason for Inclusion: Meeting State and HCD requirements Program 3.840: Other Housing Programs
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 319 of 433 ends
← All documents from this meeting