Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Atwater City Council
October 9, 2023

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
October 9, 2023
Body
Atwater City Council
Pages
498
Original file
20.5 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.atwater.org. That file is the official record.

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
SECTION 1: EARTHWORK
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
190101 Roadway Excavation CY 37,100 x 50.00 = 1,855,000 $ 194001 Ditch Excavation CY x = $ -
19801X Imported Borrow CY/TON x = $ -
192037 Structure Excavation (Retaining Wall) CY x = $ - 193013 Structure Backfill (Retaining Wall) CY x = $ -
193031 Pervious Backfill Material (Retaining Wall) CY x = $ - 16010X Clearing & Grubbing LS/ACRE 40 x 3,000.00 = $ 120,000 170101 Develop Water Supply LS 1 x 10,000.00 = $ 10,000 19801X Imported Borrow CY/TON x = $ -
210130 Duff ACRE x = $ -
XXXXXX Some Item Unit x = $ -
Basin Excavation CY 86,000 X 15.00 = $ 1,290,000
$ 3,275,000
SECTION 2: PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTION
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
401050 Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement CY x = $ -
400050 Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement CY x = $ - 404092 Seal Pavement Joint LF x = $ -
404093 Seal Isolation Joint LF x = $ -
413117 Seal Concrete Pavement Joint (Silicone) LF x = $ - 413118 Seal Pavement Joint (Asphalt Rubber) LF x = $ -
280010 Rapid Strength Concrete Base CY x = $ -
410095 Dowel Bar (Drill and Bond) EA x = $ -
390132 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON 23,000 x 140.00 = 3,220,000 $ 390137 Rubberized Hot Mix Asphalt (Gap Graded) TON x = $ - 39300X Geosynthetic Pavement Interlayer (Type X) SQYD x = $ - 26020X Class 2 Aggregate Base TON/CY 22,000 x 60.00 = 1,320,000 $ 290201 Asphalt Treated Permeable Base CY x = $ -
250401 Class 4 Aggregate Subbase CY x = $ -
374002 Asphaltic Emulsion (Fog Seal Coat) TON x = $ -
397005 Tack Coat TON x = $ -
377501 Slurry Seal TON x = $ -
3750XX Screenings (Type XX) TON x = $ -
374492 Asphaltic Emulsion (Polymer Modified) TON x = $ - 370001 Sand Cover (Seal) TON x = $ -
731530 Minor Concrete (Textured Paving) CY x = $ -
731502 Minor Concrete (Miscellaneous Construction) CY x = $ - 39407X Place Hot Mix Asphalt Dike (Type X) LF x = $ -
150771 Remove Asphalt Concrete Dike LF x = $ -
420201 Grind Existing Concrete Pavement SQYD x = $ -
150860 Remove Base and Surfacing CY 1,100 x 30.00 = $ 33,000 390095 Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing CY x = $ -
15312X Remove Concrete LF/CY/LS x = $ -
394090 Place Hot Mix Asphalt (Miscellaneous Area) SQYD x = $ - 153103 Cold Plane Asphalt Concrete Pavement SQYD x = $ - 39405X Shoulder Rumble Strip (HMA, X-In Indentations) STA x = $ - 413113 Repair Spalled Joints, Polyester Grout SQYD x = $ - 420102 Groove Existing Concrete Pavement SQYD x = $ -
390136 Minor Hot Mix Asphalt TON x = $ -
394095 Roadside Paving (Miscellaneous Areas) SQYD x = $ - $ 4,573,000

TOTAL EARTHWORK SECTION ITEMS

TOTAL PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTION ITEMS
3 of 11 6/30/2023

Page 276 of 498 ends

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
SECTION 3: DRAINAGE
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
15080X Remove Culvert EA/LF x = $ -
150820 Modify Inlet EA x = $ -
155232 Sand Backfill CY x = $ -
15020X Abandon Culvert EA/LF x = $ -
152430 Adjust Inlet LF x = $ -
155003 Cap Inlet EA x = $ -
510501 Minor Concrete CY x = $ -
510502 Minor Concrete (Minor Structure) CY x = $ -
5105XX Minor Concrete (Type XX) CY x = $ -
620XXX XX" Alternative Pipe Culvert (Type X) LF x = $ - 641104 15" Plastic Pipe LF x = $ -
641113 24" Plastic Pipe LF x = $ -
27" Plastic Pipe LF x = $ -
641119 30" Plastic Pipe LF x = $ -
650026 36" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (Type X) LF x = $ - 650030 42" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (Type X) LF x = $ - 650034 48" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (Type X) LF x = $ - 650038 54" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (Type X) LF x = $ - 650042 60" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (Type X) LF x = $ - 6650XX XX" Corrugated Steel Pipe (0.XXX" Thick) LF x = $ - 68XXXX XX" Plastic Pipe (Edge Drain) LF x = $ -
69011X XX" Corrugated Steel Pipe Downdrain (0.XXX" Thick) LF x = $ - 70321X XX" Corrugated Steel Pipe Inlet (0.XXX" Thick) LF x = $ - 70XXXX XX" Corrugated Steel Pipe Riser (0.XXX" Thick) LF x = $ - 7050XX XX" Steel Flared End Section EA x = $ -
703233 Grated Line Drain LF x = $ -
72XXXX Rock Slope Protection (Type and Method) CY/TON x = $ - 72901X Rock Slope Protection Fabric (Class X) SQYD x = $ - 721420 Concrete (Ditch Lining) CY x = $ -
721430 Concrete (Channel Lining) CY x = $ -
750001 Miscellaneous Iron and Steel LB x = $ -
Drainage LS 1 x 924,300.00 = $ 924,300
$ 924,300
SECTION 4: SPECIALTY ITEMS
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
080050 Progress Schedule (Critical Path Method) LS x = $ - 582001 Sound Wall (Masonry Block) SQFT x = $ -
510530 Minor Concrete (Wall) CY x = $ -
730020 Minor Concrete (Curb) CY 320 x 700.00 = $ 224,000 731521 Minor Concrete (Sidewalk) CY 1,400 x 800.00 = $ 1,120,000 731623 Minor Concrete (Curb Ramp) CY 10 x 1,000.00 = $ 10,000 731504 Minor Concrete (Curb & Gutter) CY 900 x 700.00 = $ 630,000 731516 Minor Concrete (Driveway) CY 80 x 1,400.00 = $ 112,000 731519 Minor Concrete (Stamped Concrete) SF 5,100 x 15.00 = $ 76,500 730070 Detectable Warning Surface SF 100 x 50.00 = $ 5,000 15325X Remove Sound Wall LF/LS x = $ -
070030 Lead Compliance Plan LS 1 x 3,000.00 = $ 3,000
141120 Treated Wood Waste LB x = $ -
153221 Remove Concrete Barrier LF x = $ -
150662 Remove Metal Beam Guard Railing LF x = $ -
150668 Remove Flared End Section EA x = $ -
800360 Chain Link Fence (Type CL-6) LF 14,000 x 30.00 = $ 420,000 80XXXX XX" Chain Link Gate (Type CL-6) EA x = $ -
832001 Metal Beam Guard Railing LF x = $ -
839301 Single Thrie Beam Barrier LF x = $ -
839310 Double Thrie Beam Barrier LF x = $ -
839521 Cable Railing LF x = $ -
8395XX Terminal System (Type CAT) EA x = $ -
839585 Alternative Flared Terminal System EA x = $ -
839584 Alternative In-line Terminal System EA x = $ -
4906XX CIDH Concrete Piling (Insert Diameter) LF x = $ - 839XXX Crash Cushion (Insert Type) EA x = $ -
83XXXX Concrete Barrier (Insert Type) LF x = $ -
520103 Bar Reinforced Steel (Retaining Wall) LB x = $ - 510060 Structural Concrete, Retaining Wall CY x = $ -
513553 Retaining Wall (Masonry Wall) SQFT x = $ -
511035 Architectural Treatment SQFT x = $ -
598001 Anti-Graffiti Coating SQFT x = $ -
203070 Rock Stain SQFT x = $ -
5136XX Reinforced Concrete Crib Wall (Type X) SQFT x = $ - 83954X Transition Railing (Type X) EA x = $ -
597601 Prepare and Stain Concrete SQFT x = $ -
839561 Rail Tensioning Assembly EA x = $ -
83958X End Anchor Assembly (Type X) EA x = $ -
XXXXXX Some Item Unit x = $ -
$ 2,600,500

TOTAL DRAINAGE ITEMS

TOTAL SPECIALTY ITEMS
4 of 11 6/30/2023

Page 277 of 498 ends

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
SECTION 5: ENVIRONMENTAL
5A - ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
Biological Mitigation LS 1 x 320,000.00 = $ 320,000
130670 Temporary Reinforced Silt Fence LF 14,000 x 3.00 = $ 42,000 141000 Temporary Fence (Type ESA) LF x = $ -
Subtotal Environmental Mitigation 362,000 $
5B - LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
20XXXX Highway Planting LS x = $ -
Landscape/Irrigation LS 1 x 1,752,000.00 = 1,752,000 $
204099 Plant Establishment Work LS x = $ -
204101 Extend Plant Establishment Work LS x = $ -
20XXXX Follow-up Landscape Project LS x = $ -
150685 Remove Irrigation Facility LS x = $ -
20XXXX Maintain Existing (Irrigation or Planted Areas) LS x = $ - 206400 Check and Test Existing Irrigation Facilities LS x = $ - 21011X Imported Topsoil (X) CY/TON x = $ -
20XXXX Rock Blanket, Rock Mulch, DG, Gravel Mulch SQFT/SQYD x = $ - 200122 Weed Germination SQYD x = $ -
208304 Water Meter EA x = $ -
2087XX XX" Conduit (Use for Irrigation x-overs) LF x = $ - 20890X Extend X" Conduit (Use for Extension of Irrigation x-overs) LF x = $ -
Subtotal Landscape and Irrigation $ 1,752,000
5C - EROSION CONTROL
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
210010 Move In/Move Out (Erosion Control) EA x = $ -
210350 Fiber Rolls LF x = $ -
210360 Compost Sock LF x = $ -
2102XX Rolled Erosion Control Product (X) SQFT x = $ -
21025X Bonded Fiber Matrix SQFT/ACRE x = $ -
210300 Hydromulch SQFT x = $ -
210420 Straw SQFT x = $ -
210430 Hydroseed SQFT x = $ -
210600 Compost SQFT x = $ -
210630 Incorporate Materials SQFT x = $ -
Subtotal Erosion Control $ -
5D - NPDES
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
130300 Prepare SWPPP LS 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000
Storm Water BMPs LS x = $ -
130200 Prepare WPCP LS x = $ -
130100 Job Site Management LS 1 x 30,000.00 = $ 30,000
130330 Storm Water Annual Report EA x = $ -
130310 Rain Event Action Plan (REAP) EA 1 x 1,000.00 = $ 1,000 130320 Storm Water Sampling and Analysis Day EA x = $ - 130520 Temporary Hydraulic Mulch SQYD x = $ -
130550 Temporary Hydroseed SQYD 30,000 x 1.00 = $ 30,000 130505 Move-In/Move-Out (Temporary Erosion Control) EA x = $ - 130640 Temporary Fiber Roll LF x = $ -
130900 Temporary Concrete Washout LS x = $ -
130710 Temporary Construction Entrance EA x = $ -
130610 Temporary Check Dam LF x = $ -
130620 Temporary Drainage Inlet Protection EA x = $ -
130730 Street Sweeping LS x = $ -
Subtotal NPDES $ 66,000
TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL 2,180,000 $
Supplemental Work for NPDES
066595 Water Pollution Control Maintenance Sharing* LS 1 x 3,000.00 = $ 3,000 066596 Additional Water Pollution Control** LS x = $ -
066597 Storm Water Sampling and Analysis*** LS x = $ -
XXXXXX Some Item LS x = $ -
Subtotal Supplemental Work for NDPS $ 3,000
*** Applies only to project with SWPPPs.
*Applies to all SWPPPs and those WPCPs with sediment control or soil stabilization BMPs. **Applies to both SWPPPs and WPCP projects.
5 of 11 6/30/2023

Page 278 of 498 ends

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
SECTION 6: TRAFFIC ITEMS
6A - Traffic Electrical
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
Actuated Traffic Signals - New EA 2 x 200,000.00 = $ 400,000 Signal Modification EA x = $ -
Street Lighting LS 1 x 924,300.00 = $ 924,300
860460 Lighting and Sign Illumination LS x = $ -
860201 Signal and Lighting LS x = $ -
860990 Closed Circuit Television System LS x = $ -
86110X Ramp Metering System (Location X) LS x = $ -
86070X Interconnection Conduit and Cable LF/LS x = $ -
5602XX Furnish Sign Structure (Type X) LB x = $ -
5602XX Install Sign Structure (Type X) LB x = $ -
498040 XX" CIDHC Pile (Sign Foundation) LF x = $ -
86080X Inductive Loop Detectors EA/LS x = $ -
8609XX Traffic Monitoring Station (Type X) LS x = $ -
15075X Remove Sign Structure EA/LS x = $ -
151581 Reconstruct Sign Structure EA x = $ -
152641 Modify Sign Structure EA x = $ -
860090 Maintain Existing Traffic Management System Elements During Construction LS x = $ - 86XXXX Fiber Optic Conduit System LS x = $ -
XXXXX Some Item Unit x = $ -
Subtotal Traffic Electrical $ 1,324,300
6B - Traffic Signing and Striping
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
566011 Roadside Sign - One Post EA x = $ -
Permanent Signing & Striping LS 1 x 132,400.00 = $ 132,400 566012 Roadside Sign - Two Post EA x = $ -
5602XX Furnish Sign SQFT x = $ -
568016 Install Sign Panel on Existing Frame SQFT x = $ - 150711 Remove Painted Traffic Stripe LF x = $ -
141101 Remove Yellow Painted Traffic Stripe (Hazardous
Waste) LF x = $ -
150712 Remove Painted Pavement Marking SQFT x = $ -
150742 Remove Roadside Sign EA x = $ -
152320 Reset Roadside Sign EA x = $ -
152390 Relocate Roadside Sign EA x = $ -
820170 Delineator (Class 1) EA 700 x 50.00 = $ 35,000
840502 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe (Enhanced Wet Night Visibility) LF x = $ - 846012 Thermoplastic Crosswalk and Pavement Marking (Enhanced Wet Night Visibility) SQFT x = $ - 120090 Construction Area Signs LS x = $ -
84XXXX Permanent Pavement Delineation LS x = $ -
Subtotal Traffic Signing and Striping $ 167,400
6C - Traffic Management Plan
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
120090 Construction Area Signs LS 1 x 13,000.00 = $ 13,000 130100 Construction Site Management LS 1 x 19,000.00 = $ 19,000 Subtotal Traffic Management Plan $ 32,000
6C - Stage Construction and Traffic Handling
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
120199 Traffic Plastic Drum EA x = $ -
12016X Channelizer (Type X) EA x = $ -
120120 Type III Barricade EA x = $ -
129100 Temporary Crash Cushion Module EA x = $ -
120100 Traffic Control System LS x = $ -
129110 Temporary Crash Cushion EA x = $ -
129000 Temporary Railing (Type K) LF x = $ -
120149 Temporary Pavement Marking (Paint) SQFT x = $ -
82010X Delineator (Class X) EA x = $ -
Subtotal Stage Construction and Traffic Handling $ -
TOTAL TRAFFIC ITEMS $ 1,523,700
6 of 11 6/30/2023

Page 279 of 498 ends

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
SECTION 7: DETOURS
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
190101 Roadway Excavation CY x = $ -
19801X Imported Borrow CY/TON x = $ -
390132 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON x = $ -
26020X Class 2 Aggregate Base TON/CY x = $ -
250401 Class 4 Aggregate Subbase CY x = $ -
130620 Temporary Drainage Inlet Protection EA x = $ -
129000 Temporary Railing (Type K) LF x = $ -
128601 Temporary Signal System LS x = $ -
120149 Temporary Pavement Marking (Paint) SQFT x = $ -
80010X Temporary Fence (Type X) LF x = $ -
XXXXXX Some Item LS x = $ -
$ -
SUBTOTAL SECTIONS 1 through 7 15,076,500 $
SECTION 8: MINOR ITEMS
8A - Americans with Disabilities Act Items
ADA Items 0.0% - $
8B - Bike Path Items
Bike Path Items 0.0% - $
8C - Other Minor Items
Other Minor Items 8.0% 1,206,120 $
Total of Section 1-7 $ 15,076,500 x 8.0% = 1,206,120 $
$ 1,206,200
SECTIONS 9: ROADWAY MOBILIZATION
Item code
Mobilization $ x 10% = 1,507,650 15,076,500 $
$ 1,507,700
SECTION 10: SUPPLEMENTAL WORK
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
066670 Payment Adjustments For Price Index
Fluctuations LS x = $ -
066094 Value Analysis LS x = $ -
066070 Maintain Traffic LS x = $ -
066919 Dispute Resolution Board LS x = $ -
066921 Dispute Resolution Advisor LS x = $ -
066015 Federal Trainee Program LS x = $ -
066610 Partnering LS x = $ -
066204 Remove Rock and Debris LS x = $ -
066222 Locate Existing Crossover LS x = $ -
XXXXXX Some Item Unit x = $ -
Cost of NPDES Supplemental Work specified in Section 5D = $ 3,000 Total Section 1-8 $ 16,282,700 2% = $ 244,241
TOTAL SUPPLEMENTAL WORK $ 247,300
Includes constructing, maintaining, and removal

TOTAL DETOURS

TOTAL MINOR ITEMS

TOTAL ROADWAY MOBILIZATION
* Includes constructing, maintaining, and removal
7 of 11 6/30/2023

Page 280 of 498 ends

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
SECTION 11: STATE FURNISHED MATERIALS AND EXPENSES
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
066105 Resident Engineers Office LS x = $0
066063 Traffic Management Plan - Public Information LS x = $0 066901 Water Expenses LS x = $0
8609XX Traffic Monitoring Station (X) LS x = $0
066841 Traffic Controller Assembly LS x = $0
066840 Traffic Signal Controller Assembly LS x = $0
066062 COZEEP Contract LS x = $0
066838 Reflective Numbers and Edge Sealer LS x = $0
066065 Tow Truck Service Patrol LS x = $0
066916 Annual Construction General Permit Fee LS x = $0 XXXXXX Some Item Unit x = $0
Total Section 1-8 $ 16,282,700 0% = $ -
$0
SECTION 12: TIME-RELATED OVERHEAD
Total of Roadway and Structures Contract Items excluding Mobilization $16,282,700 (used to calculate TRO) Total Construction Cost (excluding TRO and Contingency) $18,037,700 (used to check if project is greater than $5 million excluding contingency) Estimated Time-Related Overhead (TRO) Percentage (0% to 10%) = 4% Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
090100 Time-Related Overhead WD 400 X $5,838 = $2,335,280 TOTAL TIME-RELATED OVERHEAD $2,335,280
SECTION 13: ROADWAY CONTINGENCY
Total Section 1-12 $ 20,372,980 x 25% = $5,093,245
TOTAL CONTINGENCY $5,093,300

TOTAL STATE FURNISHED
8 of 11 6/30/2023

Page 281 of 498 ends

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
II. STRUCTURE ITEMS
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 SQFT 0 SQFT 0 SQFT
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 SQFT 0 SQFT 0 SQFT
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
STRUCTURES MOBILIZATION 10%
Recommended Contingency: (Pre-PSR 30%-50%, PSR 25%, Draft PR 20%, PR 15%, after PR approval 10%, Final PS&E 5%) Total recommended percentages includes any quantified risk based contingency from the risk register.

STRUCTURES CONTINGENCY 10%
10/26/2020

TOTAL COST OF STRUCTURES
Estimate Prepared By:

Cynthia Horner, Mark Thomas Date
$0
Cost Per Square Foot $0 $0 $0
COST OF EACH $0 $0 $0
TOTAL COST OF BRIDGES $0
TOTAL COST OF BUILDINGS $0
$0
$0
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Structure Type xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Width (Feet) [out to out]
Total Length (Feet)
Total Area (Square Feet)
Structure Depth (Feet)
Footing Type (pile or spread) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Name xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Bridge Number 57-XXX 57-XXX 57-XXX
DATE OF ESTIMATE 00/00/00 00/00/00 00/00/00
Cost Per Square Foot $0 $0 $0
COST OF EACH $0 $0 $0
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Structure Type xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Width (Feet) [out to out]
Total Length (Feet)
Total Area (Square Feet)
Structure Depth (Feet)
Footing Type (pile or spread) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Name xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Bridge Number 57-XXX 57-XXX 57-XXX
DATE OF ESTIMATE 00/00/00 00/00/00 00/00/00
9 of 11 6/30/2023

Page 282 of 498 ends

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
III. RIGHT OF WAY
Fill in all of the available information from the Right of Way Data Sheet.

A) A1) Acquisition, including Excess Land Purchases, Damages & Goodwill, Fees $ 4,500,000 A2) SB-1210 $ 0
B) Acquisition of Offsite Mitigation $ 0
C) C1) Utility Relocation (State Share) $
C2) Potholing (Design Phase) $ 0
D) Railroad Acquisition $ 0
E) Clearance / Demolition $ 0
F) Relocation Assistance (RAP and/or Last Resort Housing Costs) $ G) $
H) Environmental Review $ 0
I) 0% $ 0
J) Design Appreciation Factor 0% $ 0
K) Utility Relocation (Construction Cost) $ 425,000
L)
M)
N)
1 When estimate has Support Costs only 2 When estimate has Utility Relocation 3 When R/W Acquisition is required Utility Estimate Prepared
By Utility Coordinator2
Phone
R/W Acquisition Estimate Bob Morrison (916) 717-7069
Prepared By Right of Way Estimator3
Phone
$4,925,000
Title and Escrow
Condemnation Settlements
Note: Items G & H applied to items A + B

TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE
Support Cost Estimate Alyssa Nishikawa (559) 374-3112
Prepared By Project Coordinator1
Phone
TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE: Escalated $4,925,000
RIGHT OF WAY SUPPORT $521,000
Alyssa Nishikawa (559) 374-3112
10 of 11 6/30/2023

Page 283 of 498 ends

DO NOT PRINT THIS SHEET AS PART OF COST ESTIMATE ATTACHMENT TO PROJECT INITIATION OR APPROVAL DOCUMENTS.

IV. SUPPORT COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
Run a Support Cost Estimate Summary
Total by FY PA&ED PS&E RW CON Total $ PA&ED PS&E RW CON Total $ <2016 Expended
ETC
2017 Expended
ETC
2018 Expended
ETC
2019 Expended
ETC
2020 Expended
ETC
2021 Expended
ETC
2022 Expended
ETC
2023 Expended
ETC
2024 Expended
ETC
2025 Expended
ETC
2026 Expended
ETC $2,547,000 = $2,654,000
2027 Expended
ETC
2028 Expended
ETC $3,820,000 $500,000 $3,981,000 $521,000
2029 Expended
ETC $3,820,000 $3,981,000
>2030 Expended
ETC
$2,547,000 $3,820,000 $500,000 $3,820,000 $10,687,000 $2,654,000 $3,981,000 $521,000 $3,981,000 $11,137,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Escalated Risk Amount $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
$2,547,000 $3,820,000 $500,000 $3,820,000 Total Esc. Support Cost $2,654,000 $3,981,000 $521,000 $3,981,000 $11,137,000 -$2,547,000 -$3,820,000 -$500,000 -$3,820,000 -$10,687,000 $2,654,000 -$3,981,000 -$521,000 -$3,981,000 -$5,829,000

8.4% 12.6% 1.6% 12.6% 35.2% 8.7% 13.1% 1.7% 13.1% 36.6% 6/30/2023
Ed Noriega, Project Manager Date
6/30/2023
Alyssa Nishikawa, Design Engineer Date
Overall Percent Support Cost: 36.64%
Total Capital Outlay Support Cost: $11,137,000
Total Capital Cost: $30,392,000
PRSM workplan hours/costs verified
against approved MWA:

Approved by:

EAC (Expended + ETC)
Approved Budget (PRSM)
Difference (Budget - EAC)
Support Ratio (EAC / Cap Cost)
Duration to mid-point component
Total including Risk Amount
Risk Amount from Risk Register
Support Escalation Rate
Unescalated-Risk Loaded Escalated (4.2% per year for ETC, effective 1/2/2018 ) $4,320,000
$3,820,000
$2,654,000
$4,502,000
$3,981,000
$2,547,000

Page 284 of 498 ends

ATTACHMENT E.

PRELIMINARY PROJECT COST ESTIMATE

ALTERNATIVE II

Page 285 of 498 ends

PROJECT
EA: N/A
PID: N/A District-County-Route:
10-MERBellevue Road
PM:

SUMMARY OF PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
Current Year Cost Escalated Cost
$ 26,687,180 $ 34,876,648
$ - $ -
$ 26,687,180 $ 34,876,648
$ 7,750,000 $ 7,750,000
$ 34,438,000 $ 42,627,000
$ 2,669,000 $ 2,782,000
$ 4,004,000 $ 4,173,000
$ 1,000,000 $ 1,042,000
$ 4,004,000 $ 4,173,000
$ 11,677,000 $ 12,170,000
$ 46,150,000 $ 54,800,000
Programmed Amount
Month / Year
Date of Estimate (Month/Year) 6 / 2023
Estimated Construction Start (Month/Year) 4 / 2028
Number of Working Days = 400
Estimated Mid-Point of Construction (Month/Year) 1 / 2029 Estimated Construction End (Month/Year) 10 / 2029
12/1/2023
6/30/2026
12/1/2027
12/1/2027
4/1/2028
Date Phone
(530) 848-1222
Ed Noriega, Project Manager Date Phone

PLANNING COST ESTIMATE

BELLEVUE ROAD REALIGNMENT PSR-PDS

RIGHT OF WAY SUPPORT

TOTAL STRUCTURES COST

SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST

PSR-PDS
N/A
Widen the existing Bellevue Road between Olive Avenue and the Atwater Canal and restriping between Gipson Street and Parade Street. It will deliver 1.2 miles of 4-lane arterial road in Atwater and Merced County, which will include raised median, sidewalks, and a Class IV bikieway.

Roadway widening and realignment along Bellevue Road
To improve accessibility and circulation in Atwater and Merced County Alternative : Alternative # 2

TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY COST

TOTAL ROADWAY COST
Type of Estimate :

PA/ED SUPPORT
Program Code :

Project Limits :

Project Description:

Scope :

Reviewed by:

Begin Construction

TOTAL SUPPORT COST
Estimated Project Schedule

TOTAL PROJECT COST

PS&E SUPPORT

TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY COSTS

CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
Approved by Project Manager
RTL
PID Approval
PA/ED Approval
PS&E
Michael Hayes, City of Atwater, Contract City Engineer
1 of 11 6/30/2023

Page 286 of 498 ends

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
I. ROADWAY ITEMS SUMMARY
Cost
1 $ 1,760,000
2 $ 4,106,000
3 $ 350,000
4 $ 3,345,000
5 $ 2,075,000
6 $ 3,991,900
7 $ -
8 $ 1,562,800
9 $ 1,562,800
10 $ 260,900
11 $ -
12 $ 2,335,280
13 $ 5,337,500
$ 26,687,180
6/30/2023 (559) 374-3112
Alyssa Nishikawa, Design Engineer Date Phone
6/30/2023 (530) 848-1222
Ed Noriega, Project Manager Date Phone

TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS
Estimate Prepared By :

By signing this estimate you are attesting that you have discussed your project with all functional units and have incorporated all their comments or have discussed with them why they will not be incorporated.

State Furnished
Section
Earthwork
Pavement Structural Section
Drainage
Specialty Items
Supplemental Work
Estimate Reviewed By :

Time-Related Overhead
Roadway Contingency
Environmental
Traffic Items
Detours
Minor Items
Roadway Mobilization
2 of 11 6/30/2023

Page 287 of 498 ends

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
SECTION 1: EARTHWORK
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
190101 Roadway Excavation CY 17,300 x 50.00 = $ 865,000 194001 Ditch Excavation CY x = $ -
19801X Imported Borrow CY/TON x = $ -
192037 Structure Excavation (Retaining Wall) CY x = $ - 193013 Structure Backfill (Retaining Wall) CY x = $ -
193031 Pervious Backfill Material (Retaining Wall) CY x = $ - 16010X Clearing & Grubbing LS/ACRE 10 x 3,000.00 = $ 30,000 170101 Develop Water Supply LS 1 x 10,000.00 = $ 10,000 19801X Imported Borrow CY/TON x = $ -
210130 Duff ACRE x = $ -
XXXXXX Some Item Unit x = $ -
Basin Excavation CY 57,000 X 15.00 = $ 855,000
$ 1,760,000
SECTION 2: PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTION
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
401050 Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement CY x = $ -
400050 Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement CY x = $ - 404092 Seal Pavement Joint LF x = $ -
404093 Seal Isolation Joint LF x = $ -
413117 Seal Concrete Pavement Joint (Silicone) LF x = $ - 413118 Seal Pavement Joint (Asphalt Rubber) LF x = $ -
280010 Rapid Strength Concrete Base CY x = $ -
410095 Dowel Bar (Drill and Bond) EA x = $ -
390132 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON 20,800 x 140.00 = 2,912,000 $ 390137 Rubberized Hot Mix Asphalt (Gap Graded) TON x = $ - 39300X Geosynthetic Pavement Interlayer (Type X) SQYD x = $ - 26020X Class 2 Aggregate Base TON/CY 19,900 x 60.00 = 1,194,000 $ 290201 Asphalt Treated Permeable Base CY x = $ -
250401 Class 4 Aggregate Subbase CY x = $ -
374002 Asphaltic Emulsion (Fog Seal Coat) TON x = $ -
397005 Tack Coat TON x = $ -
377501 Slurry Seal TON x = $ -
3750XX Screenings (Type XX) TON x = $ -
374492 Asphaltic Emulsion (Polymer Modified) TON x = $ - 370001 Sand Cover (Seal) TON x = $ -
731530 Minor Concrete (Textured Paving) CY x = $ -
731502 Minor Concrete (Miscellaneous Construction) CY x = $ - 39407X Place Hot Mix Asphalt Dike (Type X) LF x = $ -
150771 Remove Asphalt Concrete Dike LF x = $ -
420201 Grind Existing Concrete Pavement SQYD x = $ -
150860 Remove Base and Surfacing CY x = $ -
390095 Replace Asphalt Concrete Surfacing CY x = $ -
15312X Remove Concrete LF/CY/LS x = $ -
394090 Place Hot Mix Asphalt (Miscellaneous Area) SQYD x = $ - 153103 Cold Plane Asphalt Concrete Pavement SQYD x = $ - 39405X Shoulder Rumble Strip (HMA, X-In Indentations) STA x = $ - 413113 Repair Spalled Joints, Polyester Grout SQYD x = $ - 420102 Groove Existing Concrete Pavement SQYD x = $ -
390136 Minor Hot Mix Asphalt TON x = $ -
394095 Roadside Paving (Miscellaneous Areas) SQYD x = $ - XXXXXX Some Item Unit x = $ -
$ 4,106,000

TOTAL EARTHWORK SECTION ITEMS

TOTAL PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTION ITEMS
3 of 11 6/30/2023

Page 288 of 498 ends

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
SECTION 3: DRAINAGE
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
15080X Remove Culvert EA/LF x = $ -
150820 Modify Inlet EA x = $ -
155232 Sand Backfill CY x = $ -
15020X Abandon Culvert EA/LF x = $ -
152430 Adjust Inlet LF x = $ -
155003 Cap Inlet EA x = $ -
510501 Minor Concrete CY x = $ -
510502 Minor Concrete (Minor Structure) CY x = $ -
5105XX Minor Concrete (Type XX) CY x = $ -
620XXX XX" Alternative Pipe Culvert (Type X) LF x = $ - 641104 15" Plastic Pipe LF x = $ -
641113 24" Plastic Pipe LF x = $ -
27" Plastic Pipe LF x = $ -
641119 30" Plastic Pipe LF x = $ -
650026 36" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (Type X) LF x = $ - 650030 42" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (Type X) LF x = $ - 650034 48" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (Type X) LF x = $ - 650038 54" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (Type X) LF x = $ - 650042 60" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (Type X) LF x = $ - 6650XX XX" Corrugated Steel Pipe (0.XXX" Thick) LF x = $ - 68XXXX XX" Plastic Pipe (Edge Drain) LF x = $ -
69011X XX" Corrugated Steel Pipe Downdrain (0.XXX" Thick) LF x = $ - 70321X XX" Corrugated Steel Pipe Inlet (0.XXX" Thick) LF x = $ - 70XXXX XX" Corrugated Steel Pipe Riser (0.XXX" Thick) LF x = $ - 7050XX XX" Steel Flared End Section EA x = $ -
703233 Grated Line Drain LF x = $ -
72XXXX Rock Slope Protection (Type and Method) CY/TON x = $ - 72901X Rock Slope Protection Fabric (Class X) SQYD x = $ - 721420 Concrete (Ditch Lining) CY x = $ -
721430 Concrete (Channel Lining) CY x = $ -
750001 Miscellaneous Iron and Steel LB x = $ -
Drainage LS 14 x 25,000.00 = $ 350,000
$ 350,000
SECTION 4: SPECIALTY ITEMS
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
080050 Progress Schedule (Critical Path Method) LS x = $ - 582001 Sound Wall (Masonry Block) SQFT x = $ -
510530 Minor Concrete (Wall) CY x = $ -
730020 Minor Concrete (Curb) CY 320 x 700.00 = $ 224,000 731521 Minor Concrete (Sidewalk) CY 1,190 x 800.00 = $ 952,000 731623 Minor Concrete (Curb Ramp) CY 10 x 1,000.00 = $ 10,000 731504 Minor Concrete (Curb & Gutter) CY 720 x 700.00 = $ 504,000 731516 Minor Concrete (Driveway) CY 10 x 1,400.00 = $ 14,000 731519 Minor Concrete (Stamped Concrete) SF 4,700 x 15.00 = $ 70,500 730070 Detectable Warning Surface SF 150 x 50.00 = $ 7,500 15325X Remove Sound Wall LF/LS x = $ -
070030 Lead Compliance Plan LS 1 x 3,000.00 = $ 3,000
141120 Treated Wood Waste LB x = $ -
153221 Remove Concrete Barrier LF x = $ -
150662 Remove Metal Beam Guard Railing LF x = $ -
150668 Remove Flared End Section EA x = $ -
800360 Chain Link Fence (Type CL-6) LF 12,000 x 30.00 = $ 360,000 80XXXX XX" Chain Link Gate (Type CL-6) EA x = $ -
832001 Metal Beam Guard Railing LF x = $ -
839301 Single Thrie Beam Barrier LF x = $ -
839310 Double Thrie Beam Barrier LF x = $ -
839521 Cable Railing LF x = $ -
8395XX Terminal System (Type CAT) EA x = $ -
839585 Alternative Flared Terminal System EA x = $ -
839584 Alternative In-line Terminal System EA x = $ -
4906XX CIDH Concrete Piling (Insert Diameter) LF x = $ - 839XXX Crash Cushion (Insert Type) EA x = $ -
83XXXX Concrete Barrier (Insert Type) LF x = $ -
520103 Bar Reinforced Steel (Retaining Wall) LB x = $ - 510060 Structural Concrete, Retaining Wall CY x = $ -
513553 Retaining Wall (Masonry Wall) SQFT 12,000 x 100.00 = $ 1,200,000 511035 Architectural Treatment SQFT x = $ -
598001 Anti-Graffiti Coating SQFT x = $ -
203070 Rock Stain SQFT x = $ -
5136XX Reinforced Concrete Crib Wall (Type X) SQFT x = $ - 83954X Transition Railing (Type X) EA x = $ -
597601 Prepare and Stain Concrete SQFT x = $ -
839561 Rail Tensioning Assembly EA x = $ -
83958X End Anchor Assembly (Type X) EA x = $ -
XXXXXX Some Item Unit x = $ -
$ 3,345,000

TOTAL DRAINAGE ITEMS

TOTAL SPECIALTY ITEMS
4 of 11 6/30/2023

Page 289 of 498 ends

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
SECTION 5: ENVIRONMENTAL
5A - ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
Biological Mitigation LS 1 x 320,000.00 = $ 320,000
130670 Temporary Reinforced Silt Fence LF 12,000 x 3.00 = $ 36,000 141000 Temporary Fence (Type ESA) LF x = $ -
Subtotal Environmental Mitigation 356,000 $
5B - LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
20XXXX Highway Planting LS x = $ -
Landscape/Irrigation LS 1 x 1,656,000.00 = 1,656,000 $
204099 Plant Establishment Work LS x = $ -
204101 Extend Plant Establishment Work LS x = $ -
20XXXX Follow-up Landscape Project LS x = $ -
150685 Remove Irrigation Facility LS x = $ -
20XXXX Maintain Existing (Irrigation or Planted Areas) LS x = $ - 206400 Check and Test Existing Irrigation Facilities LS x = $ - 21011X Imported Topsoil (X) CY/TON x = $ -
20XXXX Rock Blanket, Rock Mulch, DG, Gravel Mulch SQFT/SQYD x = $ - 200122 Weed Germination SQYD x = $ -
208304 Water Meter EA x = $ -
2087XX XX" Conduit (Use for Irrigation x-overs) LF x = $ - 20890X Extend X" Conduit (Use for Extension of Irrigation x-overs) LF x = $ -
Subtotal Landscape and Irrigation $ 1,656,000
5C - EROSION CONTROL
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
210010 Move In/Move Out (Erosion Control) EA x = $ -
210350 Fiber Rolls LF x = $ -
210360 Compost Sock LF x = $ -
2102XX Rolled Erosion Control Product (X) SQFT x = $ -
21025X Bonded Fiber Matrix SQFT/ACRE x = $ -
210300 Hydromulch SQFT x = $ -
210420 Straw SQFT x = $ -
210430 Hydroseed SQFT x = $ -
210600 Compost SQFT x = $ -
210630 Incorporate Materials SQFT x = $ -
Subtotal Erosion Control $ -
5D - NPDES
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
130300 Prepare SWPPP LS 1 x 5,000.00 = $ 5,000
Storm Water BMPs LS x = $ -
130200 Prepare WPCP LS x = $ -
130100 Job Site Management LS 1 x 30,000.00 = $ 30,000
130330 Storm Water Annual Report EA x = $ -
130310 Rain Event Action Plan (REAP) EA 1 x 1,000.00 = $ 1,000 130320 Storm Water Sampling and Analysis Day EA x = $ - 130520 Temporary Hydraulic Mulch SQYD x = $ -
130550 Temporary Hydroseed SQYD 27,000 x 1.00 = $ 27,000 130505 Move-In/Move-Out (Temporary Erosion Control) EA x = $ - 130640 Temporary Fiber Roll LF x = $ -
130900 Temporary Concrete Washout LS x = $ -
130710 Temporary Construction Entrance EA x = $ -
130610 Temporary Check Dam LF x = $ -
130620 Temporary Drainage Inlet Protection EA x = $ -
130730 Street Sweeping LS x = $ -
Subtotal NPDES $ 63,000
TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL 2,075,000 $
Supplemental Work for NPDES
066595 Water Pollution Control Maintenance Sharing* LS 1 x 3,000.00 = $ 3,000 066596 Additional Water Pollution Control** LS x = $ -
066597 Storm Water Sampling and Analysis*** LS x = $ -
XXXXXX Some Item LS x = $ -
Subtotal Supplemental Work for NDPS $ 3,000
*** Applies only to project with SWPPPs.
*Applies to all SWPPPs and those WPCPs with sediment control or soil stabilization BMPs. **Applies to both SWPPPs and WPCP projects.
5 of 11 6/30/2023

Page 290 of 498 ends

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
SECTION 6: TRAFFIC ITEMS
6A - Traffic Electrical
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
Actuated Traffic Signals - New EA 1 x 200,000.00 = $ 200,000 Street Lighting LS 1 x 1,032,800.00 = 1,032,800 $
Temporary Traffic Signal EA x = $ -
860460 Lighting and Sign Illumination LS x = $ -
860201 Signal and Lighting LS x = $ -
860990 Closed Circuit Television System LS x = $ -
86110X Ramp Metering System (Location X) LS x = $ -
86070X Interconnection Conduit and Cable LF/LS x = $ -
5602XX Furnish Sign Structure (Type X) LB x = $ -
5602XX Install Sign Structure (Type X) LB x = $ -
498040 XX" CIDHC Pile (Sign Foundation) LF x = $ -
86080X Inductive Loop Detectors EA/LS x = $ -
8609XX Traffic Monitoring Station (Type X) LS x = $ -
15075X Remove Sign Structure EA/LS x = $ -
151581 Reconstruct Sign Structure EA x = $ -
152641 Modify Sign Structure EA x = $ -
860090 Maintain Existing Traffic Management System Elements During Construction LS x = $ - 86XXXX Fiber Optic Conduit System LS x = $ -
XXXXX Some Item Unit x = $ -
Subtotal Traffic Electrical $ 1,232,800
6B - Traffic Signing and Striping
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
566011 Roadside Sign - One Post EA x = $ -
Permanent Signing & Striping LS 1 x 115,200.00 = $ 115,200 566012 Roadside Sign - Two Post EA x = $ -
5602XX Furnish Sign SQFT x = $ -
568016 Install Sign Panel on Existing Frame SQFT x = $ - 150711 Remove Painted Traffic Stripe LF x = $ -
141101 Remove Yellow Painted Traffic Stripe (Hazardous
Waste) LF x = $ -
150712 Remove Painted Pavement Marking SQFT x = $ -
150742 Remove Roadside Sign EA x = $ -
152320 Reset Roadside Sign EA x = $ -
152390 Relocate Roadside Sign EA x = $ -
820170 Delineator (Class 1) EA 600 x 50.00 = $ 30,000
840502 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe (Enhanced Wet Night Visibility) LF x = $ - 846012 Thermoplastic Crosswalk and Pavement Marking (Enhanced Wet Night Visibility) SQFT x = $ - 120090 Construction Area Signs LS x = $ -
84XXXX Permanent Pavement Delineation LS x = $ -
Subtotal Traffic Signing and Striping $ 145,200
6C - Traffic Management Plan
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
120090 Construction Area Signs LS 1 x 13,000.00 = $ 13,000 130100 Construction Site Management LS 1 x 19,000.00 = $ 19,000 Subtotal Traffic Management Plan $ 32,000
6C - Stage Construction and Traffic Handling
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
120199 Traffic Plastic Drum EA x = $ -
12016X Channelizer (Type X) EA x = $ -
120120 Type III Barricade EA x = $ -
129100 Temporary Crash Cushion Module EA x = $ -
120100 Traffic Control System LS x = $ -
129110 Temporary Crash Cushion EA x = $ -
129000 Temporary Railing (Type K) LF x = $ -
120149 Temporary Pavement Marking (Paint) SQFT x = $ -
82010X Delineator (Class X) EA x = $ -
Stage Construction LS 1 x 2,581,900.00 = 2,581,900 $
Subtotal Stage Construction and Traffic Handling $ 2,581,900 TOTAL TRAFFIC ITEMS $ 3,991,900
6 of 11 6/30/2023

Page 291 of 498 ends

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
SECTION 7: DETOURS
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
190101 Roadway Excavation CY x = $ -
19801X Imported Borrow CY/TON x = $ -
390132 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON x = $ -
26020X Class 2 Aggregate Base TON/CY x = $ -
250401 Class 4 Aggregate Subbase CY x = $ -
130620 Temporary Drainage Inlet Protection EA x = $ -
129000 Temporary Railing (Type K) LF x = $ -
128601 Temporary Signal System LS x = $ -
120149 Temporary Pavement Marking (Paint) SQFT x = $ -
80010X Temporary Fence (Type X) LF x = $ -
XXXXXX Some Item LS x = $ -
$ -
SUBTOTAL SECTIONS 1 through 7 15,627,900 $
SECTION 8: MINOR ITEMS
8A - Americans with Disabilities Act Items
ADA Items 0.0% - $
8B - Bike Path Items
Bike Path Items 0.0% - $
8C - Other Minor Items
Other Minor Items 10.0% 1,562,790 $
Total of Section 1-7 $ 15,627,900 x 10.0% = 1,562,790 $ $ 1,562,800
SECTIONS 9: ROADWAY MOBILIZATION
Item code
Mobilization $ x 10% = 1,562,790 15,627,900 $
$ 1,562,800
SECTION 10: SUPPLEMENTAL WORK
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
066670 Payment Adjustments For Price Index
Fluctuations LS x = $ -
066094 Value Analysis LS x = $ -
066070 Maintain Traffic LS x = $ -
066919 Dispute Resolution Board LS x = $ -
066921 Dispute Resolution Advisor LS x = $ -
066015 Federal Trainee Program LS x = $ -
066610 Partnering LS x = $ -
066204 Remove Rock and Debris LS x = $ -
066222 Locate Existing Crossover LS x = $ -
XXXXXX Some Item Unit x = $ -
Cost of NPDES Supplemental Work specified in Section 5D = $ 3,000 Total Section 1-8 $ 17,190,700 2% = $ 257,861
TOTAL SUPPLEMENTAL WORK $ 260,900
Includes constructing, maintaining, and removal

TOTAL DETOURS

TOTAL MINOR ITEMS

TOTAL ROADWAY MOBILIZATION
* Includes constructing, maintaining, and removal
7 of 11 6/30/2023

Page 292 of 498 ends

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
SECTION 11: STATE FURNISHED MATERIALS AND EXPENSES
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
066105 Resident Engineers Office LS x = $0
066063 Traffic Management Plan - Public Information LS x = $0 066901 Water Expenses LS x = $0
8609XX Traffic Monitoring Station (X) LS x = $0
066841 Traffic Controller Assembly LS x = $0
066840 Traffic Signal Controller Assembly LS x = $0
066062 COZEEP Contract LS x = $0
066838 Reflective Numbers and Edge Sealer LS x = $0
066065 Tow Truck Service Patrol LS x = $0
066916 Annual Construction General Permit Fee LS x = $0 XXXXXX Some Item Unit x = $0
Total Section 1-8 $ 17,190,700 0% = $ -
$0
SECTION 12: TIME-RELATED OVERHEAD
Total of Roadway and Structures Contract Items excluding Mobilization $17,190,700 (used to calculate TRO) Total Construction Cost (excluding TRO and Contingency) $19,014,400 (used to check if project is greater than $5 million excluding contingency) Estimated Time-Related Overhead (TRO) Percentage (0% to 10%) = 4% Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
090100 Time-Related Overhead WD 400 X $5,838 = $2,335,280 TOTAL TIME-RELATED OVERHEAD $2,335,280
SECTION 13: ROADWAY CONTINGENCY
Total Section 1-12 $ 21,349,680 x 25% = $5,337,420
TOTAL CONTINGENCY $5,337,500

TOTAL STATE FURNISHED
8 of 11 6/30/2023

Page 293 of 498 ends

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
II. STRUCTURE ITEMS
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 SQFT 0 SQFT 0 SQFT
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
0 SQFT 0 SQFT 0 SQFT
0 LF 0 LF 0 LF
STRUCTURES MOBILIZATION 10%
Recommended Contingency: (Pre-PSR 30%-50%, PSR 25%, Draft PR 20%, PR 15%, after PR approval 10%, Final PS&E 5%) Total recommended percentages includes any quantified risk based contingency from the risk register.

STRUCTURES CONTINGENCY 10%
6/30/2023

TOTAL COST OF STRUCTURES
Estimate Prepared By:

Alyssa Nishikawa, Mark Thomas Date
$0
Cost Per Square Foot $0 $0 $0
COST OF EACH $0 $0 $0
TOTAL COST OF BRIDGES $0
TOTAL COST OF BUILDINGS $0
$0
$0
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Structure Type xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Width (Feet) [out to out]
Total Length (Feet)
Total Area (Square Feet)
Structure Depth (Feet)
Footing Type (pile or spread) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Name xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Bridge Number 57-XXX 57-XXX 57-XXX
DATE OF ESTIMATE 00/00/00 00/00/00 00/00/00
Cost Per Square Foot $0 $0 $0
COST OF EACH $0 $0 $0
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Structure Type xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Width (Feet) [out to out]
Total Length (Feet)
Total Area (Square Feet)
Structure Depth (Feet)
Footing Type (pile or spread) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Name xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Bridge Number 57-XXX 57-XXX 57-XXX
DATE OF ESTIMATE 00/00/00 00/00/00 00/00/00
9 of 11 6/30/2023

Page 294 of 498 ends

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
III. RIGHT OF WAY
Fill in all of the available information from the Right of Way Data Sheet.

A) A1) Acquisition, including Excess Land Purchases, Damages & Goodwill, Fees $ 4,500,000 A2) SB-1210 $ 0
B) Acquisition of Offsite Mitigation $ 0
C) C1) Utility Relocation (State Share) $
C2) Potholing (Design Phase) $ 0
D) Railroad Acquisition $ 0
E) Clearance / Demolition $ 0
F) Relocation Assistance (RAP and/or Last Resort Housing Costs) $ G) $
H) Environmental Review $ 0
I) 0% $ 0
J) Design Appreciation Factor 0% $ 0
K) Utility Relocation (Construction Cost) $ 3,250,000
L)
M)
N)
1 When estimate has Support Costs only 2 When estimate has Utility Relocation 3 When R/W Acquisition is required Utility Estimate Prepared
By Utility Coordinator2
Phone
R/W Acquisition Estimate Bob Morrison (916) 717-7069
Prepared By Right of Way Estimator3
Phone
$7,750,000
Title and Escrow
Condemnation Settlements
Note: Items G & H applied to items A + B

TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE
Support Cost Estimate Alyssa Nishikawa (559) 374-3112
Prepared By Project Coordinator1
Phone
TOTAL R/W ESTIMATE: Escalated $7,750,000
RIGHT OF WAY SUPPORT $1,042,000
Alyssa Nishikawa (559) 374-3112
10 of 11 6/30/2023

Page 295 of 498 ends

DO NOT PRINT THIS SHEET AS PART OF COST ESTIMATE ATTACHMENT TO PROJECT INITIATION OR APPROVAL DOCUMENTS.

IV. SUPPORT COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
Run a Support Cost Estimate Summary
Total by FY PA&ED PS&E RW CON Total $ PA&ED PS&E RW CON Total $ <2016 Expended
ETC
2017 Expended
ETC
2018 Expended
ETC
2019 Expended
ETC
2020 Expended
ETC
2021 Expended
ETC
2022 Expended
ETC
2023 Expended
ETC
2024 Expended
ETC
2025 Expended
ETC
2026 Expended
ETC $2,669,000 $2,782,000
2027 Expended
ETC
2028 Expended
ETC $4,004,000 $1,000,000 $4,173,000 $1,042,000
2029 Expended
ETC $4,004,000 $4,173,000
>2030 Expended
ETC
$2,669,000 $4,004,000 $1,000,000 $4,004,000 $11,677,000 $2,782,000 $4,173,000 $1,042,000 $4,173,000 $12,170,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Escalated Risk Amount $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
$2,669,000 $4,004,000 $1,000,000 $4,004,000 Total Esc. Support Cost $2,782,000 $4,173,000 $1,042,000 $4,173,000 $12,170,000 -$2,669,000 -$4,004,000 -$1,000,000 -$4,004,000 -$11,677,000 $2,782,000 -$4,173,000 -$1,042,000 -$4,173,000 -$6,606,000

7.8% 11.6% 2.9% 11.6% 33.9% 8.1% 12.1% 3.0% 12.1% 35.3% 6/30/2023
Ed Noriega, Division Manager Date
6/30/2023
Alyssa Nishikawa, Design Engineer Date
Overall Percent Support Cost: 35.34%
Total Capital Outlay Support Cost: $12,170,000
Total Capital Cost: $34,438,000
PRSM workplan hours/costs verified
against approved MWA:

Approved by:

EAC (Expended + ETC)
Approved Budget (PRSM)
Difference (Budget - EAC)
Support Ratio (EAC / Cap Cost)
Duration to mid-point component
Total including Risk Amount
Risk Amount from Risk Register
Support Escalation Rate
Unescalated-Risk Loaded Escalated (4.2% per year for ETC, effective 1/2/2018 ) $5,004,000
$4,004,000
$2,782,000
$5,215,000
$4,173,000
$2,669,000

Page 296 of 498 ends

ATTACHMENT F.

CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE SECTIONS

ALTERNATIVE I

RIGHT-OF-WAY

Page 297 of 498 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ∙ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EXHIBIT K PHASE CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE FORM - 4-EX-8 (REV 1/2019) RIGHT OF WAY Page 1 of 4

K PHASE CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE FORM - RIGHT OF WAY
**A RIGHT OF WAY DATA SHEET WILL NEED TO BE COMPLETED
FOR SUBSEQUENT PHASES**
To: Date: June 12, 2023
(REQUESTING DIVISION)
Dist-Co-Rte-PM: 10-Merced-Bellevue Rd
____________________________________ Project ID/EA:
(NAME OF REQUESTOR) Alternative #: 1
From:

BJ Swanner
Monument, Inc.

Estimator
Bob Morrison
Monument, Inc.

Senior Estimator
Scope of the Right of Way
Description of Required Right of Way:

Alternative I proposes to realign existing Bellevue Road from the Atwater Canal to Grove Ave. The realigned roadway would provide through-traffic access to a portion of Bellevue Road currently used as a private road by a large agricultural/industrial business. The proposed road would be 110 feet wide, and would include two travel lanes, a Class IV bikeway, landscape buffer, and 8-foot sidewalks in each direction, as well as an 18-foot raised median. The proposed alignment would create two new signalized intersections at Orchard Park Ave. and Vine Ave. Two drainage basins would also be constructed as part of the project.

Construction of the proposed project as described would require partial fee acquisitions from 9 parcels including 8 parcels zoned agricultural and 1 parcel zoned residential. No significant improvements would be impacted by the proposed design, though some cultivated land would be acquired.

Right of Way Required: ☒ Yes ☐ No
Number of Total Parcels: ☒ 1-10 ☐ 11-25 ☐ 26-50 ☐ 51-100 ☐ >100 Right of Way Requirements
Number of Fee Parcels ____9__________ Total Fee Area ____1,228,785______ Number of Permanent Easements ___N/A____ Total Permanent Easement Area ___N/A_________ Number of Temporary Easements ___N/A____ Total Temporary Easement Area ____N/A__ Length of Term Required for Temporary Easements ___N/A_____________________ Number of Excess Parcels/Other____N/A____________________________________________

Page 298 of 498 ends

EXHIBIT
K PHASE CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE FORM - 4-EX-8 (REV 1/2019) RIGHT OF WAY (Cont.) Page 2 of 4
USA Lands: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐Unknown
BIA Lands: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐Unknown
Displaced Persons/Businesses: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐Unknown Number of Displacees________ Demolition/Clearance Required: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐Unknown Number of Demos________ Railroad Involvement: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐Unknown
C&M Agreement Needed: ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐Unknown
Utility Involvement: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☒Unknown Number of Utilities in Area _____ UT Relocations Anticipated: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐Unknown
Potholing Needed: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☒Unknown
Project Public Meetings: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐Unknown Number of Meetings__TBD___ Permits To Enter ENV/ENG: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐Unknown Number of Permits__4______ Environmental Mitigation: ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒Unknown ____________________ Outdoor Advertising Signs: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐Unknown Number of Signs___N/A_____ Cost Estimates
Estimate reflects Right of Way only and does not include any capital costs for Right of Way Engineering/Land Surveys.

Capital Costs - Phase 9 ☐ $0-$100,000 ☒ $2,500,001-$5,000,000 ☐ $100,001-$250,000 ☐ $5,000,001-$10,000,000
☐ $250,001-$500,000 ☐ $10,000,001-$25,000,000
☐ $500,001-$1,000,000 ☐ $25,000,001-$100,000,000
☐ $1,000,001-$2,500,000 ☐ >$100,000,000
Capital Costs – Phase 4 ☐ $0-$100,000 ☐ $2,500,001-$5,000,000 ☐ $100,001-$250,000 ☐ $5,000,001-$10,000,000
☒ $250,001-$500,000 ☐ $10,000,001-$25,000,000
☐ $500,001-$1,000,000 ☐ $25,000,001-$100,000,000
☐ $1,000,001-$2,500,000 ☐ >$100,000,000
Phase 9 - Recommended R/W Capital Cost for Programming
$______________4,500,000_______________
Phase 4 - Recommended R/W Capital Cost for Programming
$___________425,000_________________

Page 299 of 498 ends

EXHIBIT
K PHASE CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE FORM - 4-EX-8 (REV 1/2019) RIGHT OF WAY (Cont.) INSTRUCTIONS

Page 3 of 4 ends

Estimate reflects Right of Way only and does not include any support costs for Right of Way Engineering/Land Surveys.

Phase 0 Support Costs
(PA&ED) $____10,000______________________
Tasks: 100.10, 160.10, 160.30,
165.10, 170.10, 170.15, 170.25,
175.10, 180.05, 180.10
Phase 1 Support Costs (PS&E) ☒ $0-$100,000
☐ $100,001-$250,000
☐ $250,001-$500,000
☐ $500,001-$1,000,000
☐ $1,000,001-$2,500,000
☐ $2,500,001-$5,000,000
☐ $5,000,001-$10,000,000
☐ $10,000,001-$25,000,000
☐ $25,000,001-$100,000,000
☐ >$100,000,000
Tasks: 100.15, 185.05, 185.20,
185.25, 205.10, 205.15, 205.25,
235.05, 235.10, 255
Phase 2 Support Costs (RW)
Tasks: 100.25, 195.40, 195.45,
200.15, 200.20, 200.25, 200.30,
225.50, 225.60, 225.65, 225.70,
225.75, 225.80, 245.50, 245.60,
245.65, 245.70, 245.75, 245.80
☐ $0-$100,000
☐ $100,001-$250,000
☒ $250,001-$500,000
☐ $500,001-$1,000,000
☐ $1,000,001-$2,500,000
☐ $2,500,001-$5,000,000
☐ $5,000,001-$10,000,000
☐ $10,000,001-$25,000,000
☐ $25,000,001-$100,000,000
☐ >$100,000,000
Phase 3 Support Costs (CON) ☒ $0-$100,000 ☐ $2,500,001-$5,000,000 Tasks: 270.25, 285 ☐ $100,001-$250,000 ☐ $5,000,001-$10,000,000 ☐ $250,001-$500,000 ☐ $10,000,001-$25,000,000
☐ $500,001-$1,000,000 ☐ $25,000,001-$100,000,000
☐ $1,000,001-$2,500,000
☐ >$100,000,000
Schedule
Right of Way will require a minimum of _24_ months to deliver a Right of Way Certification once final right of way requirements and mapping have been received, necessary environmental clearances have been obtained, and required freeway agreements have been approved. This schedule is based on a Right of Way Certification #1 with an anticipated cert date of June 2028.

Page 300 of 498 ends

EXHIBIT
K PHASE CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE FORM - 4-EX-8 (REV 1/2019) RIGHT OF WAY (Cont.) INSTRUCTIONS

Page 4 of 4 ends

Areas of Concern
Dole Packaged Foods, LLC (Dole) owns and operates a large facility near the proposed project site. Dole also owns several actively cultivated agricultural properties impacted by the project. We understand Dole may use discharged industrial wastewater to irrigate the land, possibly under a permit with the Regional Water Quality Control Board. If land acquisition (and subsequent conversion to public roadway use) reduces the amount of allowable water discharge permitted, Dole may suffer additional severance damages. Due to the early nature of the project phase and uncertainty regarding a potential permit, we have not attempted to include estimated damages as part of this Conceptual Cost Estimate. Estimates will be revised, and a Right of Way Data Sheet prepared at a subsequent phase.

Assumptions and Limiting Conditions
This estimate is based on the following assumptions and limiting conditions and documented project risks:

The Scope of the Right of Way analysis includes applicable:
● Acquisition Costs (including any Excess Lands, Damages, Mitigation, etc.) ● Utility Relocation
● Railroad Involvement
● Relocation Assistance
● Clearance/Demolition
● Permits
● Title and Escrow Fees
● Construction Contract Work
Capital Costs are based on eminent domain estimating and appraisal methodologies and current market information. Support Costs are based on district workload estimating tools and historical data from previous similar projects.

Escalation and Contingency Rates were applied based on the proposed project schedule and previous district experience to account for changes in market conditions and other unanticipated project-related costs.

Check as applicable:
☒ A field review was not performed as part of this estimate. ☒ Mapping received did not provide sufficient detail to determine the limits of the right of way requirements and/or to determine damages to the remainder parcels impacted by the project. ☒ Additional right of way requirements may be anticipated but are not defined due to the preliminary nature of the early design requirements.
☐ We have determined that there are no right of way functional involvements in the proposed project at this time as currently designed.
☒ Utility lead time begins after PA&ED is met and we have received conflict maps. ☐ Right of Way certification is at risk. The current schedule does not provide Right of Way with sufficient lead time.

Contact
For further information regarding this estimate, please contact person below:

Title: Bob Morrison, PE, Broker, Vice President - Monument Phone Number: 916-717-7069

Page 301 of 498 ends

ATTACHMENT G.

CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE SECTIONS

ALTERNATIVE II

RIGHT-OF-WAY

Page 302 of 498 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ∙ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EXHIBIT K PHASE CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE FORM - 4-EX-8 (REV 1/2019) RIGHT OF WAY Page 1 of 4

K PHASE CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE FORM - RIGHT OF WAY
**A RIGHT OF WAY DATA SHEET WILL NEED TO BE COMPLETED
FOR SUBSEQUENT PHASES**
To: Date: June 12, 2023
(REQUESTING DIVISION)
Dist-Co-Rte-PM: 10-Merced-Bellevue Rd
____________________________________ Project ID/EA:
(NAME OF REQUESTOR) Alternative #: 2
From:

BJ Swanner
Monument, Inc.

Estimator
Bob Morrison
Monument, Inc.

Senior Estimator
Scope of the Right of Way
Description of Required Right of Way:

Alternative II proposes to widen and improve existing Bellevue Road from the Atwater Canal to Grove Ave. The improved roadway would provide through-traffic access to a portion of Bellevue Road currently used as a private road by a large agricultural/industrial business. The proposed road would be 110 feet wide, and would include two travel lanes, a Class IV bikeway, landscape buffer, and 8-foot sidewalks in each direction, as well as an 18-foot raised median. The proposed alignment would create two new signalized intersections at Orchard Park Ave. and Vine Ave. Two drainage basins would also be constructed as part of the project.

Construction of the proposed project as described would require partial fee acquisitions from 10 larger parcels comprised of 12 assessor parcels including 10 parcels zoned agricultural and 2 parcels zoned residential. Proposed improvements would result in several impacts to a large industrial business including removal of approximately 120 passenger vehicle parking spaces and several commercial vehicle spaces, relocation of a large fuel tank, acquisition of various site improvements including asphalt, paving, over 1,300 linear feet of chain-link fencing and a security barrier. Cost for improvements, relocation of personal property, and personal property relocation have been included in the estimate.

Right of Way Required: ☒ Yes ☐ No
Number of Total Parcels: ☒ 1-10 ☐ 11-25 ☐ 26-50 ☐ 51-100 ☐ >100 Right of Way Requirements
Number of Fee Parcels ____10__________ Total Fee Area ____781,000______ Number of Permanent Easements ___N/A____ Total Permanent Easement Area ___N/A_________ Number of Temporary Easements ___N/A____ Total Temporary Easement Area ____N/A__ Length of Term Required for Temporary Easements ___N/A_____________________ Number of Excess Parcels/Other____N/A____________________________________________

Page 303 of 498 ends

EXHIBIT
K PHASE CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE FORM - 4-EX-8 (REV 1/2019) RIGHT OF WAY (Cont.) Page 2 of 4
USA Lands: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐Unknown
BIA Lands: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐Unknown
Displaced Persons/Businesses: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐Unknown Number of Displacees________ Demolition/Clearance Required: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐Unknown Number of Demos________ Railroad Involvement: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐Unknown
C&M Agreement Needed: ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐Unknown
Utility Involvement: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☒Unknown Number of Utilities in Area _____ UT Relocations Anticipated: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐Unknown
Potholing Needed: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☒Unknown
Project Public Meetings: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐Unknown Number of Meetings__TBD___ Permits To Enter ENV/ENG: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐Unknown Number of Permits________ Environmental Mitigation: ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒Unknown ____________________ Outdoor Advertising Signs: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐Unknown Number of Signs___N/A_____ Cost Estimates
Estimate reflects Right of Way only and does not include any capital costs for Right of Way Engineering/Land Surveys.

Capital Costs - Phase 9 ☐ $0-$100,000 ☒ $2,500,001-$5,000,000 ☐ $100,001-$250,000 ☐ $5,000,001-$10,000,000
☐ $250,001-$500,000 ☐ $10,000,001-$25,000,000
☐ $500,001-$1,000,000 ☐ $25,000,001-$100,000,000
☐ $1,000,001-$2,500,000 ☐ >$100,000,000
Capital Costs – Phase 4 ☐ $0-$100,000 ☒ $2,500,001-$5,000,000 ☐ $100,001-$250,000 ☐ $5,000,001-$10,000,000
☐ $250,001-$500,000 ☐ $10,000,001-$25,000,000
☐ $500,001-$1,000,000 ☐ $25,000,001-$100,000,000
☐ $1,000,001-$2,500,000 ☐ >$100,000,000
Phase 9 - Recommended R/W Capital Cost for Programming
$______________4,500,000_______________
Phase 4 - Recommended R/W Capital Cost for Programming
$___________3,250,000_________________

Page 304 of 498 ends

EXHIBIT
K PHASE CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE FORM - 4-EX-8 (REV 1/2019) RIGHT OF WAY (Cont.) INSTRUCTIONS

Page 3 of 4 ends

Estimate reflects Right of Way only and does not include any support costs for Right of Way Engineering/Land Surveys.

Phase 0 Support Costs
(PA&ED) $____10,000______________________
Tasks: 100.10, 160.10, 160.30,
165.10, 170.10, 170.15, 170.25,
175.10, 180.05, 180.10
Phase 1 Support Costs (PS&E) ☒ $0-$100,000
☐ $100,001-$250,000
☐ $250,001-$500,000
☐ $500,001-$1,000,000
☐ $1,000,001-$2,500,000
☐ $2,500,001-$5,000,000
☐ $5,000,001-$10,000,000
☐ $10,000,001-$25,000,000
☐ $25,000,001-$100,000,000
☐ >$100,000,000
Tasks: 100.15, 185.05, 185.20,
185.25, 205.10, 205.15, 205.25,
235.05, 235.10, 255
Phase 2 Support Costs (RW)
Tasks: 100.25, 195.40, 195.45,
200.15, 200.20, 200.25, 200.30,
225.50, 225.60, 225.65, 225.70,
225.75, 225.80, 245.50, 245.60,
245.65, 245.70, 245.75, 245.80
☐ $0-$100,000
☐ $100,001-$250,000
☐ $250,001-$500,000
☒ $500,001-$1,000,000
☐ $1,000,001-$2,500,000
☐ $2,500,001-$5,000,000
☐ $5,000,001-$10,000,000
☐ $10,000,001-$25,000,000
☐ $25,000,001-$100,000,000
☐ >$100,000,000
Phase 3 Support Costs (CON) ☒ $0-$100,000 ☐ $2,500,001-$5,000,000 Tasks: 270.25, 285 ☐ $100,001-$250,000 ☐ $5,000,001-$10,000,000 ☐ $250,001-$500,000 ☐ $10,000,001-$25,000,000
☐ $500,001-$1,000,000 ☐ $25,000,001-$100,000,000
☐ $1,000,001-$2,500,000
☐ >$100,000,000
Schedule
Right of Way will require a minimum of _24_ months to deliver a Right of Way Certification once final right of way requirements and mapping have been received, necessary environmental clearances have been obtained, and required freeway agreements have been approved. This schedule is based on a Right of Way Certification #1 with an anticipated cert date of June 2028.

Areas of Concern
Dole Packaged Foods, LLC (Dole) owns and operates a large facility near the proposed project site. Dole currently uses Bellevue Road as a private drive and does not permit through traffic. It is currently unknow whether Dole holds an easement, license, or other rights granting them the use of Bellevue road. In addition to the acquisition of property and improvements as described above, Dole may claim damages due to loss of the private access, loss of parking, and the forced reconfiguration of

Page 305 of 498 ends

EXHIBIT
K PHASE CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE FORM - 4-EX-8 (REV 1/2019) RIGHT OF WAY (Cont.) INSTRUCTIONS

Page 4 of 4 ends

their operations to accommodate the project. This Conceptual Cost Estimate has assumed damages of $1,000,000, but this value should be updated once more is learned about impacts to the site.

Additionally, Dole owns several actively cultivated agricultural properties that would be impacted by the project. We understand Dole may use discharged industrial wastewater to irrigate the agricultural land, possibly under a permit with the regional Water Quality Control Board. If land acquisition (and subsequent conversion to public roadway use) reduces the amount of allowable water discharge permitted, Dole may suffer additional severance damages. Due to the early nature of the project phase and uncertainty regarding a potential permit, we have not attempted to include estimated damages as part of this Conceptual Cost Estimate. Estimates will be revised, and a Right of Way Data Sheet prepared at a subsequent phase.

Assumptions and Limiting Conditions
This estimate is based on the following assumptions and limiting conditions and documented project risks:

The Scope of the Right of Way analysis includes applicable:
● Acquisition Costs (including any Excess Lands, Damages, Mitigation, etc.) ● Utility Relocation
● Railroad Involvement
● Relocation Assistance
● Clearance/Demolition
● Permits
● Title and Escrow Fees
● Construction Contract Work
Capital Costs are based on eminent domain estimating and appraisal methodologies and current market information. Support Costs are based on district workload estimating tools and historical data from previous similar projects.

Escalation and Contingency Rates were applied based on the proposed project schedule and previous district experience to account for changes in market conditions and other unanticipated project-related costs.

Check as applicable:
☒ A field review was not performed as part of this estimate. ☒ Mapping received did not provide sufficient detail to determine the limits of the right of way requirements and/or to determine damages to the remainder parcels impacted by the project. ☒ Additional right of way requirements may be anticipated but are not defined due to the preliminary nature of the early design requirements.
☐ We have determined that there are no right of way functional involvements in the proposed project at this time as currently designed.
☒ Utility lead time begins after PA&ED is met and we have received conflict maps. ☐ Right of Way certification is at risk. The current schedule does not provide Right of Way with sufficient lead time.

Contact
For further information regarding this estimate, please contact person below:

Title: Bob Morrison, PE, Broker, Vice President - Monument Phone Number: 916-717-7069

Page 306 of 498 ends

ATTACHMENT H.

RISK REGISTER

Page 307 of 498 ends
Page 308 of 498 ends
Page 309 of 498 ends

ATTACHMENT I.

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT (TEPA)

Page 310 of 498 ends

100 Pringle Avenue | Suite 600 | Walnut Creek, CA 94596 | (925) 930-7100 | Fax (925) 933-7090 www.fehrandpeers.com
Final Memorandum
Date: June 8, 2023
To: Ed Noriega and Alyssa Nishikawa, Mark Thomas
From: Ron Ramos, Dana Ebe, and Ian Barnes, Fehr & Peers Subject: Draft Traffic Engineering Performance Assessment for the Bellevue Road Realignment Project – Project Development Support (PSR-PDS) WC22-3940
This memorandum presents the Traffic Engineering Performance Assessment (TEPA) in support of the Bellevue Road Realignment (the “Project”) – Project Development Support (PSR-PDS) phase, located in Merced County, in and near the City of Atwater, California. The City of Atwater (City), in partnership with the County of Merced (County), has initiated this PSR-PDS to evaluate improvements along Bellevue Road. The analysis has been prepared in accordance with Article 5 of Appendix S: Preparation Guideline for Project Study Report–Project Development Support Project Initiation Document of the Project Development Procedures Manual (PDPM) prepared by Caltrans and tailored for an analysis of a 20-year design life.

The analysis indicates that, with the current Bellevue Road closure between Vine Avenue and Gipson Street, drivers reroute around the Bellevue Road closure, including using other SR 99 interchanges. Providing a direct route from the SR 99/Westside Boulevard interchange to central Atwater would be beneficial to existing community members and accommodate future local development as envisioned in the upcoming General Plan Update for the City. Providing a more direct route for travelers would reduce VMT (consistent with State goals).

Proposed Project Description
The Project proposes to construct an approximately 1.6-mile-long, 4-lane arterial between Grove Avenue and Atwater Canal in Merced County, in and near the City of Atwater, California. Project Alternative 1 proposes to realign Bellevue Road south of the Dole International Holdings campus, south of the existing Bellevue Road alignment. Bellevue Road Alternative 2 proposes to connect Bellevue Road through the Dole International Holdings campus, along the existing alignment of Bellevue Road that is currently closed to public traffic. A conceptual layout of the Project limits

Page 311 of 498 ends

Ed Noriega and Alyssa Nishikawa
June 8, 2023

Page 2 of 21 ends

and the two design alternative alignments are presented in Figure 1. Specifically, the Project would accomplish the following:
• Widen Bellevue Road from a two-lane facility to a four-lane urban major arterial for

1.6 miles between Grove Avenue and Parade Street.
• Restripe Bellevue Road between the Atwater Canal and Parade Street. • Construct new intersection connections along Bellevue Road at Vine Avenue and Orchard Park Avenue.
• Provide pedestrian facilities and Class IV bike lanes along the Bellevue Road corridor.

Bellevue Road is currently closed to traffic between Vine Avenue and Gipson Street, requiring the public to reroute around the closure (an additional 2.5 miles of travel) to access the State Route (SR) 99/Westside Boulevard interchange. The road realignment will provide a direct route from the SR 99/Westside Boulevard interchange to central Atwater to reduce vehicle-miles traveled (VMT) and travel time. Additionally, the Project would improve the accessibility and mobility of goods and persons to central Atwater. Specifically, the purpose of the Project is to:
• Improve accessibility and mobility of goods and persons in Atwater; • Provide a direct route from the SR 99 Westside Boulevard interchange to the Castle Commerce Center located in central Atwater;
• Reduce VMT;
• Provide bicycle and pedestrian facilities; and
• Accommodate local development and provide consistency with existing and planned local and regional development.

Page 312 of 498 ends

Westside Blvd
Olive Ave
Bellevue Rd Bellevue Rd
Fruitland Ave
Fruitland Ave Fruitland Ave
Grove AveVine Ave
N Winton WayShaer Rd
Bert Crane Rd
Applegate Rd
Bell Dr
Atwater Blvd
Olive Ave
Longview Rd
First St
Juniper Ave

ATWATER
99 J18 1
2 3 5
5 8
9 6
7 4
Project Site Vicinity Map and Study Intersections
Figure 1
WC22-3940_1_StudyArea
Study Intersection Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 1
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 2
#

Page 313 of 498 ends

Ed Noriega and Alyssa Nishikawa
June 8, 2023

Page 4 of 21 ends

Summary of Preliminary Findings and Recommendations
Study Locations, Analysis Scenarios, Data Sources, and Traffic Forecasting Assumptions
This TEPA was prepared to provide analyses of the Project with sponsorship from the City of Atwater and in partnership with the County of Merced. The traffic operations analysis study area and analysis tools for the Bellevue Road Realignment Project are intended to reflect the level of detail necessary for an analysis of a 20-year design life.

Study Locations
Based on the location of the Project and the potential to impact local traffic operations, the following nine existing intersections (presented in Table 1) along the Bellevue Road/Westside Boulevard, SR 99, and North Winton Way corridors were evaluated.

Table 1: TEPA Study Intersections
Intersection Existing Traffic Control

1. Westside Boulevard/SR 99 Southbound Ramps Side Street Stop-Control

2. Westside Boulevard/SR 99 Northbound Ramps Side Street Stop-Control

3. Westside Boulevard/Bellevue Road/Olive Avenue Side Street Stop-Control

4. Bellevue Road/Grove Avenue Side Street Stop-Control

5. Bellevue Road/Vine Avenue All-Way Stop-Control

6. Vine Avenue/Fruitland Avenue All-Way Stop-Control

7. Fruitland Avenue/North Winton Way Signalized

8. Bellevue Road/North Winton Way Signalized

9. Atwater Boulevard/SR 99 Northbound Ramps Uncontrolled Source: Fehr & Peers, 2023.

Analysis Scenarios
The following scenarios were evaluated during the mid-week (Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday) morning (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and afternoon (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) peak periods:
• Existing Conditions (2023)
• Design Year Conditions (2050, or 20 years after the projected opening date of 2030) The highest AM one-hour and PM one-hour of traffic volumes were identified for each of the study intersections from these peak periods and carried forward into the analysis.

Page 314 of 498 ends

Ed Noriega and Alyssa Nishikawa
June 8, 2023

Page 5 of 21 ends

Sources of Available Data
Per the PSR-PDS guidelines, the TEPA has been limited to an assessment of readily-available information and data, and macro-level analysis and evaluation. The following data sources were used in the preparation of this document.

Intersection Traffic Counts
Existing Conditions intersection traffic volumes collected in February 2023 were obtained from the City of Atwater for the AM peak period (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and PM peak period (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) peak periods at the study intersections. The highest AM one-hour and PM one-hour of traffic volumes for each intersection (based on data collected in 15-minute intervals) were identified from these multi-hour counts; each intersection peak hour volume was carried forward into the analysis. Peak hour intersection vehicle volumes are summarized in Figure 2 along with existing lane configurations and traffic controls. The traffic counts for Existing Conditions are presented in Attachment A.

Existing Conditions peak hour factor (PHF) data was computed for each intersection from the intersection traffic counts. Individual intersection AM peak hour PHF and PM peak hour PHF were applied over the analysis area for the Synchro model. Future year analysis was conducted using a PHF of 0.88 for study intersections 1 through 6 and a PHF of 0.92 for intersections 7 through 9.

Existing heavy vehicle percentage (HV%) was computed for each intersection from the intersection traffic counts with a minimum HV% of 3%. Individual intersection AM peak hour HV% and PM peak hour HV% were applied over the analysis area for the Synchro model. Future year analysis assumed the same HV% as study intersections in Existing Conditions.

Signal Timing Data
Signal timing and phasing data for each of the signalized study intersections within the study area was obtained from Caltrans and the City of Atwater.

Field Reconnaissance
Fehr & Peers performed field reconnaissance to collect data regarding lane configurations, turn pocket lengths, speed limits, and supplemental intersection signal timing/phasing information within the study area. Fehr & Peers also performed weekday AM peak period and PM peak period observations at each study intersection to identify the extent of existing congestion and queues.

Page 315 of 498 ends

Existing Conditions
Lane Configurations, Intersection Control, and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 2
90 (92)
48 (73) 3 (13) 4 (2)
56 (130)
89 (65)
54 (42)

1. SR 99 SB Ramps/Westside Blvd
47 (23)
0 (3)
31 (47)
39 (16)
107 (206)
141 (62)
96 (84)

2. SR 99 NB Ramps/Westside Blvd
58 (41)26 (17)
0 (1)
25 (29)
83 (165)
30 (59) 22 (28) 13 (27)
5 (6)
4 (1)
157 (77)
1 (0)

3. Olive Avenue/Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd
1 (0)8 (7)2 (1)
14 (49)
71 (123)
3 (0) 41 (23) 3 (1)
0 (0)
1 (0)
120 (55)
4 (4)

4. Grove Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
66 (112)
10 (1)
0 (0) 104 (60) 0 (0)
1 (0)
0 (0)
7 (3)
0 (0)

5. Vine Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (1)
13 (25)47 (89)
1 (5)
21 (51)
0 (1) 4 (2) 16 (20)
65 (24)
48 (8)
66 (40)
64 (31)

6. Vine Ave/Fruitland Ave
413 (326)304 (471)
249 (90)
402 (210)406 (236) 328 (423)

7. N Winton Way/Fruitland Ave
100 (24)
391 (474)107 (211)
48 (27)
139 (42)
93 (21) 22 (16) 385 (397)
243 (247)
224 (189)
123 (71)
107 (186)

8. N Winton Way/Bellevue Rd
Westside Blvd
SR 99 SB Ramps
dvlB edistseW dR euvelleB
Olive Avenue
Bellevue Rd
Grove Ave
Bellevue Rd
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
N Winton Way
Bellevue Rd
N Winton Way
24 (12)
358 (633)
467 (319)
34 (36)

9. SR 99 On-Ramps/Atwater Blvd
Atwater Blvd
SR 99 On-Ramps
Westside Blvd
SR 99 NB Ramps
STOP

STOP STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
E
BF
AC
BF
AC
E
D
BF
BF
D
D
BF
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
ACC
AF
CCF
ACE
ACCF
ACE
ACE
AC
E
Design Year No Project Conditions
Lane Configurations, Intersection Control, and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 3
130 (130)
70 (100) 10 (20) 10 (10)
80 (170)
130 (90)
70 (60)

1. SR 99 SB Ramps/Westside Blvd
60 (30)
0 (10)
40 (60)
50 (30)
160 (270)
180 (80)
140 (120)

2. SR 99 NB Ramps/Westside Blvd
80 (60)40 (30)
0 (10)
40 (40)
120 (210)
40 (80) 30 (40) 20 (40)
10 (10)
10 (10)
210 (100)
10 (0)

3. Olive Avenue/Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd
10 (0)
20 (10)10 (10)
20 (70)
100 (160)
10 (0) 60 (30) 10 (10)
0 (0)
10 (0)
160 (80)
10 (10)

4. Grove Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
90 (150)
20 (10)
0 (0) 140 (80) 0 (0)
10 (0)
0 (0)
10 (10)
0 (0)

5. Vine Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (10)
20 (40)
60 (120)
10 (10)
30 (70)
0 (10) 10 (10) 30 (30)
90 (40)
70 (20)
90 (60)
90 (40)

6. Vine Ave/Fruitland Ave
530 (420)390 (600)
320 (120)
520 (270)520 (300) 420 (540)

7. N Winton Way/Fruitland Ave
130 (40)
500 (610)140 (270)
70 (40)
180 (60)
120 (30) 30 (30) 490 (510)
310 (320)
290 (250)
160 (100)
140 (240)

8. N Winton Way/Bellevue Rd
Westside Blvd
SR 99 SB Ramps
dvlB edistseW dR euvelleB
Olive Avenue
Bellevue Rd
Grove Ave
Bellevue Rd
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
N Winton Way
Bellevue Rd
N Winton Way
40 (20)
460 (810)
600 (410)
50 (50)

9. SR 99 On-Ramps/Atwater Blvd
Atwater Blvd
SR 99 On-Ramps
Westside Blvd
SR 99 NB Ramps
STOP

STOP STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
E
BF
AC
BF
AC
E
D
BF
BF
D
D
BF
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
ACC
AF
CCF
ACE
ACCF
ACE
ACE
AC
E
Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 1) Conditions
Lane Configurations, Intersection Control, and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 4
140 (160)
60 (70) 10 (20) 10 (10)
150 (410)
130 (100)
70 (60)

1. SR 99 SB Ramps/Westside Blvd
20 (20)
0 (10)
40 (60)
50 (30)
240 (540)
540 (200)
180 (140)

2. SR 99 NB Ramps/Westside Blvd
80 (60)40 (30)
0 (10)
40 (40)
200 (480)
40 (80) 30 (40) 20 (40)
10 (10)
10 (10)
610 (240)
10 (0)

3. Olive Avenue/Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd
10 (0)
20 (10)10 (10)
10 (40)
190 (460)
10 (0) 40 (20) 10 (10)
0 (0)
10 (0)
580 (230)
10 (10)

4. Grove Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
60 (90)
140 (370)
0 (0) 80 (60) 0 (0)
10 (0)
0 (0)
490 (180)
0 (0)

5. Vine Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (10)
20 (40)30 (60)
10 (10)
20 (40)
0 (10) 10 (10) 30 (30)
90 (40)
70 (20)
70 (50)
30 (20)

6. Vine Ave/Fruitland Ave
540 (430)390 (600)
320 (120)
500 (270)520 (300) 420 (540)

7. N Winton Way/Fruitland Ave
150 (30)
490 (580)110 (120)
90 (80)
210 (210)
20 (40) 110 (50) 390 (490)
310 (320)
290 (250)
260 (170)
40 (170)

8. N Winton Way/Bellevue Rd
Westside Blvd
SR 99 SB Ramps
dvlB edistseW dR euvelleB
Olive Avenue
Bellevue Rd
Grove Ave
Bellevue Rd
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
N Winton Way
Bellevue Rd
N Winton Way
40 (20)
380 (540)
200 (280)
50 (50)

9. SR 99 On-Ramps/Atwater Blvd
Atwater Blvd
SR 99 On-Ramps
Westside Blvd
SR 99 NB Ramps
STOP

STOP STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
E
BF
AC
BF
AC
E
D
BF
BF
D
D
BF
D
BE
BE
D
D
BE
D
D
D
D
ACC
AF
CCF
ACE
ACCF
ACE
ACE
AC
E
Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 2) Conditions
Lane Configurations, Intersection Control, and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 5
140 (160)
60 (70) 10 (20) 10 (10)
150 (410)
140 (100)
70 (60)

1. SR 99 SB Ramps/Westside Blvd
20 (20)
0 (10)
40 (60)
50 (30)
240 (540)
540 (200)
190 (140)

2. SR 99 NB Ramps/Westside Blvd
80 (60)40 (30)
0 (10)
40 (40)
200 (480)
40 (80) 30 (40) 20 (40)
10 (10)
10 (10)
620 (240)
10 (0)

3. Olive Avenue/Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd
10 (0)
20 (10)10 (10)
10 (40)
190 (460)
10 (0) 40 (20) 10 (10)
0 (0)
10 (0)
590 (230)
10 (10)

4. Grove Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
60 (90)
140 (370)
0 (0) 90 (60) 0 (0)
10 (0)
0 (0)
490 (180)
0 (0)

5. Vine Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (10)
20 (40)30 (60)
10 (10)
20 (40)
0 (10) 10 (10) 30 (30)
90 (40)
70 (20)
70 (50)
40 (20)

6. Vine Ave/Fruitland Ave
540 (430)390 (600)
320 (120)
500 (270)520 (300) 420 (540)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)

7. N Winton Way/Fruitland Ave
150 (30)
490 (580)110 (120)
90 (80)
210 (210)
20 (40) 110 (50) 390 (490)
310 (320)
290 (250)
260 (170)
40 (170)

8. N Winton Way/Bellevue Rd
Westside Blvd
SR 99 SB Ramps
dvlB edistseW dR euvelleB
Olive Avenue
Bellevue Rd
Grove Ave
Bellevue Rd
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
N Winton Way
Bellevue Rd
N Winton Way
40 (20)
380 (540)
200 (280)
50 (50)

9. SR 99 On-Ramps/Atwater Blvd
Atwater Blvd
SR 99 On-Ramps
Westside Blvd
SR 99 NB Ramps
STOP

STOP STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
E
BF
AC
BF
AC
E
D
BF
BF
D
D
BF
D
BE
BE
D
D
BE
D
D
D
D
ACC
AF
CCF
D
ACE
ACCF
ACE
ACE
AC
E
lvd
Olive Ave
Bellevue Rd Bellevue Rd
Fruitland Ave
Fruitland Ave Fruitland Ave
Grove AveVine Ave
N Winton Way
Shaer Rd
Bert Crane Rd
Applegate Rd
Bell Dr
Atwater Blvd
Olive Ave
Longview Rd
First St
Juniper Ave

ATWATER
99 J18 1
2 3 5
5 8
9 6
7 4
Project Site Vicinity Map and Study Intersections
Figure 1
40_1_StudyArea
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 1
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 2
WC22-3940_X_Volumes
# Study Intersection
XX (YY) AM (PM) Peak Hour Trac Volumes Signalized Intersection STOP Stop Sign Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 1
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 2
Existing Conditions
Lane Configurations, Intersection Control, and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 2
90 (92)
48 (73) 3 (13) 4 (2)
56 (130)
89 (65)
54 (42)

1. SR 99 SB Ramps/Westside Blvd
47 (23)
0 (3)
31 (47)
39 (16)
107 (206)
141 (62)
96 (84)

2. SR 99 NB Ramps/Westside Blvd
58 (41)26 (17)
0 (1)
25 (29)
83 (165)
30 (59) 22 (28) 13 (27)
5 (6)
4 (1)
157 (77)
1 (0)

3. Olive Avenue/Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd
1 (0)8 (7)2 (1)
14 (49)
71 (123)
3 (0) 41 (23) 3 (1)
0 (0)
1 (0)
120 (55)
4 (4)

4. Grove Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
66 (112)
10 (1)
0 (0) 104 (60) 0 (0)
1 (0)
0 (0)
7 (3)
0 (0)

5. Vine Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (1)
13 (25)47 (89)
1 (5)
21 (51)
0 (1) 4 (2) 16 (20)
65 (24)
48 (8)
66 (40)
64 (31)

6. Vine Ave/Fruitland Ave
413 (326)304 (471)
249 (90)
402 (210)406 (236) 328 (423)

7. N Winton Way/Fruitland Ave
100 (24)
391 (474)107 (211)
48 (27)
139 (42)
93 (21) 22 (16) 385 (397)
243 (247)
224 (189)
123 (71)
107 (186)

8. N Winton Way/Bellevue Rd
Westside Blvd
SR 99 SB Ramps
dvlB edistseW dR euvelleB
Olive Avenue
Bellevue Rd
Grove Ave
Bellevue Rd
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
N Winton Way
Bellevue Rd
N Winton Way
24 (12)
358 (633)
467 (319)
34 (36)

9. SR 99 On-Ramps/Atwater Blvd
Atwater Blvd
SR 99 On-Ramps
Westside Blvd
SR 99 NB Ramps
STOP

STOP STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
E
BF
AC
BF
AC
E
D
BF
BF
D
D
BF
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
ACC
AF
CCF
ACE
ACCF
ACE
ACE
AC
E
Olive Ave
Bellevue Rd Bellevue Rd
Fruitland Ave
Fruitland Ave Fruitland Ave
Grove AveVine Ave
N Winton Way
Shaer Rd
Bert Crane Rd
Applegate Rd
Bell Dr
Atwater Blvd
Olive Ave
Longview Rd
First St
Juniper Ave

ATWATER
99 J18 1
2 3 5
5 8
9 6
7 4
Project Site Vicinity Map and Study Intersections
Figure 1
1_StudyArea
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 1
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 2
WC22-3940_X_Volumes
# Study Intersection
XX (YY) AM (PM) Peak Hour Trac Volumes Signalized Intersection STOP Stop Sign Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 1
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 2

Page 316 of 498 ends

Ed Noriega and Alyssa Nishikawa
June 8, 2023

Page 7 of 21 ends

Collision Data
Collision data for the study area for the SR 99 corridor were derived from Caltrans’ Traffic Accident Surveillance and Analysis System (TASAS) for the most recent three-year period (not impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic) from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019. Collision data for facilities not on the State Highway System were derived from the CHP Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the same three-year period.

Design Year 2050 Traffic Forecasting Assumptions
The Project used traffic data from the Three-County Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) Air Quality Conformity Model to develop an annual peak hour and daily volume growth rate. The RTP/SCS model was recently applied for the traffic analyses for the SR 59 Widening & Black Rascal Creek Bridges PA&ED and the Los Banos Pioneer Road Complete Streets PA&ED. The annual peak hour and daily volume growth rate (discussed in further sections) was used to develop traffic forecasts for the study alternatives and study periods.

Per the PSR-PDS guidelines the forecasts will be prepared in greater detail and updated during the Project Approval/Environmental Document (PA&ED) phase. The following analysis alternatives were evaluated for Design Year Conditions (2050):

Design Year No Project Conditions
The Design Year No Project Conditions forecasts were prepared for the intersections listed above based on an annual growth factor from the RTP/SCS model. • Traffic volumes at the study intersections are expected to grow by about 1.0 percent per year between Existing Conditions and Design Year 2050. The growth rate calculations are presented in Attachment B.
• Design Year No Project Conditions reflects the discontinuity along Bellevue Road. • The Design Year No Project Conditions are consistent with the lane configurations during Existing Conditions.
• Therefore, the Design Year No Project Conditions peak hour intersection vehicle volumes were calculated by applying the 1.0 percent per year growth rate to the Existing Conditions peak hour intersection vehicle volumes.

The forecast peak hour intersection volumes, along with lane configurations and traffic controls, for Design Year No Project Conditions are summarized in Figure 3.

Page 317 of 498 ends

Existing Conditions
Lane Configurations, Intersection Control, and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 2
90 (92)
48 (73) 3 (13) 4 (2)
56 (130)
89 (65)
54 (42)

1. SR 99 SB Ramps/Westside Blvd
47 (23)
0 (3)
31 (47)
39 (16)
107 (206)
141 (62)
96 (84)

2. SR 99 NB Ramps/Westside Blvd
58 (41)26 (17)
0 (1)
25 (29)
83 (165)
30 (59) 22 (28) 13 (27)
5 (6)
4 (1)
157 (77)
1 (0)

3. Olive Avenue/Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd
1 (0)8 (7)2 (1)
14 (49)
71 (123)
3 (0) 41 (23) 3 (1)
0 (0)
1 (0)
120 (55)
4 (4)

4. Grove Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
66 (112)
10 (1)
0 (0) 104 (60) 0 (0)
1 (0)
0 (0)
7 (3)
0 (0)

5. Vine Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (1)
13 (25)47 (89)
1 (5)
21 (51)
0 (1) 4 (2) 16 (20)
65 (24)
48 (8)
66 (40)
64 (31)

6. Vine Ave/Fruitland Ave
413 (326)304 (471)
249 (90)
402 (210)406 (236) 328 (423)

7. N Winton Way/Fruitland Ave
100 (24)
391 (474)107 (211)
48 (27)
139 (42)
93 (21) 22 (16) 385 (397)
243 (247)
224 (189)
123 (71)
107 (186)

8. N Winton Way/Bellevue Rd
Westside Blvd
SR 99 SB Ramps
dvlB edistseW dR euvelleB
Olive Avenue
Bellevue Rd
Grove Ave
Bellevue Rd
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
N Winton Way
Bellevue Rd
N Winton Way
24 (12)
358 (633)
467 (319)
34 (36)

9. SR 99 On-Ramps/Atwater Blvd
Atwater Blvd
SR 99 On-Ramps
Westside Blvd
SR 99 NB Ramps
STOP

STOP STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
E
BF
AC
BF
AC
E
D
BF
BF
D
D
BF
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
ACC
AF
CCF
ACE
ACCF
ACE
ACE
AC
E
Design Year No Project Conditions
Lane Configurations, Intersection Control, and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 3
130 (130)
70 (100) 10 (20) 10 (10)
80 (170)
130 (90)
70 (60)

1. SR 99 SB Ramps/Westside Blvd
60 (30)
0 (10)
40 (60)
50 (30)
160 (270)
180 (80)
140 (120)

2. SR 99 NB Ramps/Westside Blvd
80 (60)40 (30)
0 (10)
40 (40)
120 (210)
40 (80) 30 (40) 20 (40)
10 (10)
10 (10)
210 (100)
10 (0)

3. Olive Avenue/Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd
10 (0)
20 (10)10 (10)
20 (70)
100 (160)
10 (0) 60 (30) 10 (10)
0 (0)
10 (0)
160 (80)
10 (10)

4. Grove Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
90 (150)
20 (10)
0 (0) 140 (80) 0 (0)
10 (0)
0 (0)
10 (10)
0 (0)

5. Vine Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (10)
20 (40)
60 (120)
10 (10)
30 (70)
0 (10) 10 (10) 30 (30)
90 (40)
70 (20)
90 (60)
90 (40)

6. Vine Ave/Fruitland Ave
530 (420)390 (600)
320 (120)
520 (270)520 (300) 420 (540)

7. N Winton Way/Fruitland Ave
130 (40)
500 (610)140 (270)
70 (40)
180 (60)
120 (30) 30 (30) 490 (510)
310 (320)
290 (250)
160 (100)
140 (240)

8. N Winton Way/Bellevue Rd
Westside Blvd
SR 99 SB Ramps
dvlB edistseW dR euvelleB
Olive Avenue
Bellevue Rd
Grove Ave
Bellevue Rd
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
N Winton Way
Bellevue Rd
N Winton Way
40 (20)
460 (810)
600 (410)
50 (50)

9. SR 99 On-Ramps/Atwater Blvd
Atwater Blvd
SR 99 On-Ramps
Westside Blvd
SR 99 NB Ramps
STOP

STOP STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
E
BF
AC
BF
AC
E
D
BF
BF
D
D
BF
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
ACC
AF
CCF
ACE
ACCF
ACE
ACE
AC
E
Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 1) Conditions
Lane Configurations, Intersection Control, and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 4
140 (160)
60 (70) 10 (20) 10 (10)
150 (410)
130 (100)
70 (60)

1. SR 99 SB Ramps/Westside Blvd
20 (20)
0 (10)
40 (60)
50 (30)
240 (540)
540 (200)
180 (140)

2. SR 99 NB Ramps/Westside Blvd
80 (60)40 (30)
0 (10)
40 (40)
200 (480)
40 (80) 30 (40) 20 (40)
10 (10)
10 (10)
610 (240)
10 (0)

3. Olive Avenue/Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd
10 (0)
20 (10)10 (10)
10 (40)
190 (460)
10 (0) 40 (20) 10 (10)
0 (0)
10 (0)
580 (230)
10 (10)

4. Grove Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
60 (90)
140 (370)
0 (0) 80 (60) 0 (0)
10 (0)
0 (0)
490 (180)
0 (0)

5. Vine Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (10)
20 (40)30 (60)
10 (10)
20 (40)
0 (10) 10 (10) 30 (30)
90 (40)
70 (20)
70 (50)
30 (20)

6. Vine Ave/Fruitland Ave
540 (430)390 (600)
320 (120)
500 (270)520 (300) 420 (540)

7. N Winton Way/Fruitland Ave
150 (30)
490 (580)110 (120)
90 (80)
210 (210)
20 (40) 110 (50) 390 (490)
310 (320)
290 (250)
260 (170)
40 (170)

8. N Winton Way/Bellevue Rd
Westside Blvd
SR 99 SB Ramps
dvlB edistseW dR euvelleB
Olive Avenue
Bellevue Rd
Grove Ave
Bellevue Rd
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
N Winton Way
Bellevue Rd
N Winton Way
40 (20)
380 (540)
200 (280)
50 (50)

9. SR 99 On-Ramps/Atwater Blvd
Atwater Blvd
SR 99 On-Ramps
Westside Blvd
SR 99 NB Ramps
STOP

STOP STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
E
BF
AC
BF
AC
E
D
BF
BF
D
D
BF
D
BE
BE
D
D
BE
D
D
D
D
ACC
AF
CCF
ACE
ACCF
ACE
ACE
AC
E
Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 2) Conditions
Lane Configurations, Intersection Control, and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 5
140 (160)
60 (70) 10 (20) 10 (10)
150 (410)
140 (100)
70 (60)

1. SR 99 SB Ramps/Westside Blvd
20 (20)
0 (10)
40 (60)
50 (30)
240 (540)
540 (200)
190 (140)

2. SR 99 NB Ramps/Westside Blvd
80 (60)40 (30)
0 (10)
40 (40)
200 (480)
40 (80) 30 (40) 20 (40)
10 (10)
10 (10)
620 (240)
10 (0)

3. Olive Avenue/Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd
10 (0)
20 (10)10 (10)
10 (40)
190 (460)
10 (0) 40 (20) 10 (10)
0 (0)
10 (0)
590 (230)
10 (10)

4. Grove Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
60 (90)
140 (370)
0 (0) 90 (60) 0 (0)
10 (0)
0 (0)
490 (180)
0 (0)

5. Vine Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (10)
20 (40)30 (60)
10 (10)
20 (40)
0 (10) 10 (10) 30 (30)
90 (40)
70 (20)
70 (50)
40 (20)

6. Vine Ave/Fruitland Ave
540 (430)390 (600)
320 (120)
500 (270)520 (300) 420 (540)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)

7. N Winton Way/Fruitland Ave
150 (30)
490 (580)110 (120)
90 (80)
210 (210)
20 (40) 110 (50) 390 (490)
310 (320)
290 (250)
260 (170)
40 (170)

8. N Winton Way/Bellevue Rd
Westside Blvd
SR 99 SB Ramps
dvlB edistseW dR euvelleB
Olive Avenue
Bellevue Rd
Grove Ave
Bellevue Rd
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
N Winton Way
Bellevue Rd
N Winton Way
40 (20)
380 (540)
200 (280)
50 (50)

9. SR 99 On-Ramps/Atwater Blvd
Atwater Blvd
SR 99 On-Ramps
Westside Blvd
SR 99 NB Ramps
STOP

STOP STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
E
BF
AC
BF
AC
E
D
BF
BF
D
D
BF
D
BE
BE
D
D
BE
D
D
D
D
ACC
AF
CCF
D
ACE
ACCF
ACE
ACE
AC
E
lvd
Olive Ave
Bellevue Rd Bellevue Rd
Fruitland Ave
Fruitland Ave Fruitland Ave
Grove AveVine Ave
N Winton Way
Shaer Rd
Bert Crane Rd
Applegate Rd
Bell Dr
Atwater Blvd
Olive Ave
Longview Rd
First St
Juniper Ave

ATWATER
99 J18 1
2 3 5
5 8
9 6
7 4
Project Site Vicinity Map and Study Intersections
Figure 1
40_1_StudyArea
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 1
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 2
WC22-3940_X_Volumes
# Study Intersection
XX (YY) AM (PM) Peak Hour Trac Volumes Signalized Intersection STOP Stop Sign Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 1
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 2
Design Year No Project Conditions
Lane Configurations, Intersection Control, and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 3
130 (130)
70 (100) 10 (20) 10 (10)
80 (170)
130 (90)
70 (60)

1. SR 99 SB Ramps/Westside Blvd
60 (30)
0 (10)
40 (60)
50 (30)
160 (270)
180 (80)
140 (120)

2. SR 99 NB Ramps/Westside Blvd
80 (60)40 (30)
0 (10)
40 (40)
120 (210)
40 (80) 30 (40) 20 (40)
10 (10)
10 (10)
210 (100)
10 (0)

3. Olive Avenue/Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd
10 (0)
20 (10)10 (10)
20 (70)
100 (160)
10 (0) 60 (30) 10 (10)
0 (0)
10 (0)
160 (80)
10 (10)

4. Grove Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
90 (150)
20 (10)
0 (0) 140 (80) 0 (0)
10 (0)
0 (0)
10 (10)
0 (0)

5. Vine Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (10)
20 (40)
60 (120)
10 (10)
30 (70)
0 (10) 10 (10) 30 (30)
90 (40)
70 (20)
90 (60)
90 (40)

6. Vine Ave/Fruitland Ave
530 (420)390 (600)
320 (120)
520 (270)520 (300) 420 (540)

7. N Winton Way/Fruitland Ave
130 (40)
500 (610)140 (270)
70 (40)
180 (60)
120 (30) 30 (30) 490 (510)
310 (320)
290 (250)
160 (100)
140 (240)

8. N Winton Way/Bellevue Rd
Westside Blvd
SR 99 SB Ramps
dvlB edistseW dR euvelleB
Olive Avenue
Bellevue Rd
Grove Ave
Bellevue Rd
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
N Winton Way
Bellevue Rd
N Winton Way
40 (20)
460 (810)
600 (410)
50 (50)

9. SR 99 On-Ramps/Atwater Blvd
Atwater Blvd
SR 99 On-Ramps
Westside Blvd
SR 99 NB Ramps
STOP

STOP STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
E
BF
AC
BF
AC
E
D
BF
BF
D
D
BF
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
ACC
AF
CCF
ACE
ACCF
ACE
ACE
AC
E
d
Olive Ave
Bellevue Rd Bellevue Rd
Fruitland Ave
Fruitland Ave Fruitland Ave
Grove AveVine Ave
N Winton Way
Shaer Rd
Bert Crane Rd
Applegate Rd
Bell Dr
Atwater Blvd
Olive Ave
Longview Rd
First St
Juniper Ave

ATWATER
99 J18 1
2 3 5
5 8
9 6
7 4
Project Site Vicinity Map and Study Intersections
Figure 1
1_StudyArea
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 1
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 2
WC22-3940_X_Volumes
# Study Intersection
XX (YY) AM (PM) Peak Hour Trac Volumes Signalized Intersection STOP Stop Sign Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 1
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 2

Page 318 of 498 ends

Ed Noriega and Alyssa Nishikawa
June 8, 2023

Page 9 of 21 ends

Design Year Plus Project Conditions
The Design Year Plus Project Conditions forecasts were prepared for the intersections listed above based on an annual growth factor from the RTP/SCS model. • Traffic volumes at the study intersections are expected to grow by about 1.0 percent per year between Existing Conditions and Design Year 2050.
• The Design Year Plus Project Conditions forecasts reflect proposed conditions to realign Bellevue Road.
• The Design Year Plus Project Conditions are not consistent with the lane configurations during Existing Conditions. Instead, these conditions are consistent with the RTP/SCS Model that assumes Bellevue Road is connected.
• Therefore, based on a select link analysis at Bellevue Road, manual rerouting of the Design Year No Project Conditions peak hour intersection vehicle volumes was applied to develop the Design Year Plus Project Conditions. Select link plots from the RTP/SCS model are displayed in Attachment C.

The Design Year Plus Project Conditions peak hour intersection vehicle volumes, along with lane configurations and traffic controls, are summarized for Project Alternative 1 and Project Alternative 2 in Figures 4 and 5, respectively.

Page 319 of 498 ends

Existing Conditions
Lane Configurations, Intersection Control, and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 2
90 (92)
48 (73) 3 (13) 4 (2)
56 (130)
89 (65)
54 (42)

1. SR 99 SB Ramps/Westside Blvd
47 (23)
0 (3)
31 (47)
39 (16)
107 (206)
141 (62)
96 (84)

2. SR 99 NB Ramps/Westside Blvd
58 (41)26 (17)
0 (1)
25 (29)
83 (165)
30 (59) 22 (28) 13 (27)
5 (6)
4 (1)
157 (77)
1 (0)

3. Olive Avenue/Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd
1 (0)8 (7)2 (1)
14 (49)
71 (123)
3 (0) 41 (23) 3 (1)
0 (0)
1 (0)
120 (55)
4 (4)

4. Grove Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
66 (112)
10 (1)
0 (0) 104 (60) 0 (0)
1 (0)
0 (0)
7 (3)
0 (0)

5. Vine Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (1)
13 (25)47 (89)
1 (5)
21 (51)
0 (1) 4 (2) 16 (20)
65 (24)
48 (8)
66 (40)
64 (31)

6. Vine Ave/Fruitland Ave
413 (326)304 (471)
249 (90)
402 (210)406 (236) 328 (423)

7. N Winton Way/Fruitland Ave
100 (24)
391 (474)107 (211)
48 (27)
139 (42)
93 (21) 22 (16) 385 (397)
243 (247)
224 (189)
123 (71)
107 (186)

8. N Winton Way/Bellevue Rd
Westside Blvd
SR 99 SB Ramps
dvlB edistseW dR euvelleB
Olive Avenue
Bellevue Rd
Grove Ave
Bellevue Rd
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
N Winton Way
Bellevue Rd
N Winton Way
24 (12)
358 (633)
467 (319)
34 (36)

9. SR 99 On-Ramps/Atwater Blvd
Atwater Blvd
SR 99 On-Ramps
Westside Blvd
SR 99 NB Ramps
STOP

STOP STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
E
BF
AC
BF
AC
E
D
BF
BF
D
D
BF
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
ACC
AF
CCF
ACE
ACCF
ACE
ACE
AC
E
Design Year No Project Conditions
Lane Configurations, Intersection Control, and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 3
130 (130)
70 (100) 10 (20) 10 (10)
80 (170)
130 (90)
70 (60)

1. SR 99 SB Ramps/Westside Blvd
60 (30)
0 (10)
40 (60)
50 (30)
160 (270)
180 (80)
140 (120)

2. SR 99 NB Ramps/Westside Blvd
80 (60)40 (30)
0 (10)
40 (40)
120 (210)
40 (80) 30 (40) 20 (40)
10 (10)
10 (10)
210 (100)
10 (0)

3. Olive Avenue/Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd
10 (0)
20 (10)10 (10)
20 (70)
100 (160)
10 (0) 60 (30) 10 (10)
0 (0)
10 (0)
160 (80)
10 (10)

4. Grove Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
90 (150)
20 (10)
0 (0) 140 (80) 0 (0)
10 (0)
0 (0)
10 (10)
0 (0)

5. Vine Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (10)
20 (40)
60 (120)
10 (10)
30 (70)
0 (10) 10 (10) 30 (30)
90 (40)
70 (20)
90 (60)
90 (40)

6. Vine Ave/Fruitland Ave
530 (420)390 (600)
320 (120)
520 (270)520 (300) 420 (540)

7. N Winton Way/Fruitland Ave
130 (40)
500 (610)140 (270)
70 (40)
180 (60)
120 (30) 30 (30) 490 (510)
310 (320)
290 (250)
160 (100)
140 (240)

8. N Winton Way/Bellevue Rd
Westside Blvd
SR 99 SB Ramps
dvlB edistseW dR euvelleB
Olive Avenue
Bellevue Rd
Grove Ave
Bellevue Rd
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
N Winton Way
Bellevue Rd
N Winton Way
40 (20)
460 (810)
600 (410)
50 (50)

9. SR 99 On-Ramps/Atwater Blvd
Atwater Blvd
SR 99 On-Ramps
Westside Blvd
SR 99 NB Ramps
STOP

STOP STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
E
BF
AC
BF
AC
E
D
BF
BF
D
D
BF
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
ACC
AF
CCF
ACE
ACCF
ACE
ACE
AC
E
Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 1) Conditions
Lane Configurations, Intersection Control, and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 4
140 (160)
60 (70) 10 (20) 10 (10)
150 (410)
130 (100)
70 (60)

1. SR 99 SB Ramps/Westside Blvd
20 (20)
0 (10)
40 (60)
50 (30)
240 (540)
540 (200)
180 (140)

2. SR 99 NB Ramps/Westside Blvd
80 (60)40 (30)
0 (10)
40 (40)
200 (480)
40 (80) 30 (40) 20 (40)
10 (10)
10 (10)
610 (240)
10 (0)

3. Olive Avenue/Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd
10 (0)
20 (10)10 (10)
10 (40)
190 (460)
10 (0) 40 (20) 10 (10)
0 (0)
10 (0)
580 (230)
10 (10)

4. Grove Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
60 (90)
140 (370)
0 (0) 80 (60) 0 (0)
10 (0)
0 (0)
490 (180)
0 (0)

5. Vine Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (10)
20 (40)30 (60)
10 (10)
20 (40)
0 (10) 10 (10) 30 (30)
90 (40)
70 (20)
70 (50)
30 (20)

6. Vine Ave/Fruitland Ave
540 (430)390 (600)
320 (120)
500 (270)520 (300) 420 (540)

7. N Winton Way/Fruitland Ave
150 (30)
490 (580)110 (120)
90 (80)
210 (210)
20 (40) 110 (50) 390 (490)
310 (320)
290 (250)
260 (170)
40 (170)

8. N Winton Way/Bellevue Rd
Westside Blvd
SR 99 SB Ramps
dvlB edistseW dR euvelleB
Olive Avenue
Bellevue Rd
Grove Ave
Bellevue Rd
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
N Winton Way
Bellevue Rd
N Winton Way
40 (20)
380 (540)
200 (280)
50 (50)

9. SR 99 On-Ramps/Atwater Blvd
Atwater Blvd
SR 99 On-Ramps
Westside Blvd
SR 99 NB Ramps
STOP

STOP STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
E
BF
AC
BF
AC
E
D
BF
BF
D
D
BF
D
BE
BE
D
D
BE
D
D
D
D
ACC
AF
CCF
ACE
ACCF
ACE
ACE
AC
E
Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 2) Conditions
Lane Configurations, Intersection Control, and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 5
140 (160)
60 (70) 10 (20) 10 (10)
150 (410)
140 (100)
70 (60)

1. SR 99 SB Ramps/Westside Blvd
20 (20)
0 (10)
40 (60)
50 (30)
240 (540)
540 (200)
190 (140)

2. SR 99 NB Ramps/Westside Blvd
80 (60)40 (30)
0 (10)
40 (40)
200 (480)
40 (80) 30 (40) 20 (40)
10 (10)
10 (10)
620 (240)
10 (0)

3. Olive Avenue/Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd
10 (0)
20 (10)10 (10)
10 (40)
190 (460)
10 (0) 40 (20) 10 (10)
0 (0)
10 (0)
590 (230)
10 (10)

4. Grove Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
60 (90)
140 (370)
0 (0) 90 (60) 0 (0)
10 (0)
0 (0)
490 (180)
0 (0)

5. Vine Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (10)
20 (40)30 (60)
10 (10)
20 (40)
0 (10) 10 (10) 30 (30)
90 (40)
70 (20)
70 (50)
40 (20)

6. Vine Ave/Fruitland Ave
540 (430)390 (600)
320 (120)
500 (270)520 (300) 420 (540)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)

7. N Winton Way/Fruitland Ave
150 (30)
490 (580)110 (120)
90 (80)
210 (210)
20 (40) 110 (50) 390 (490)
310 (320)
290 (250)
260 (170)
40 (170)

8. N Winton Way/Bellevue Rd
Westside Blvd
SR 99 SB Ramps
dvlB edistseW dR euvelleB
Olive Avenue
Bellevue Rd
Grove Ave
Bellevue Rd
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
N Winton Way
Bellevue Rd
N Winton Way
40 (20)
380 (540)
200 (280)
50 (50)

9. SR 99 On-Ramps/Atwater Blvd
Atwater Blvd
SR 99 On-Ramps
Westside Blvd
SR 99 NB Ramps
STOP

STOP STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
E
BF
AC
BF
AC
E
D
BF
BF
D
D
BF
D
BE
BE
D
D
BE
D
D
D
D
ACC
AF
CCF
D
ACE
ACCF
ACE
ACE
AC
E
lvd
Olive Ave
Bellevue Rd Bellevue Rd
Fruitland Ave
Fruitland Ave Fruitland Ave
Grove AveVine Ave
N Winton Way
Shaer Rd
Bert Crane Rd
Applegate Rd
Bell Dr
Atwater Blvd
Olive Ave
Longview Rd
First St
Juniper Ave

ATWATER
99 J18 1
2 3 5
5 8
9 6
7 4
Project Site Vicinity Map and Study Intersections
Figure 1
40_1_StudyArea
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 1
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 2
WC22-3940_X_Volumes
# Study Intersection
XX (YY) AM (PM) Peak Hour Trac Volumes Signalized Intersection STOP Stop Sign Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 1
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 2
Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 1) Conditions
Lane Configurations, Intersection Control, and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 4
140 (160)
60 (70) 10 (20) 10 (10)
150 (410)
130 (100)
70 (60)

1. SR 99 SB Ramps/Westside Blvd
20 (20)
0 (10)
40 (60)
50 (30)
240 (540)
540 (200)
180 (140)

2. SR 99 NB Ramps/Westside Blvd
80 (60)40 (30)
0 (10)
40 (40)
200 (480)
40 (80) 30 (40) 20 (40)
10 (10)
10 (10)
610 (240)
10 (0)

3. Olive Avenue/Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd
10 (0)
20 (10)10 (10)
10 (40)
190 (460)
10 (0) 40 (20) 10 (10)
0 (0)
10 (0)
580 (230)
10 (10)

4. Grove Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
60 (90)
140 (370)
0 (0) 80 (60) 0 (0)
10 (0)
0 (0)
490 (180)
0 (0)

5. Vine Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (10)
20 (40)30 (60)
10 (10)
20 (40)
0 (10) 10 (10) 30 (30)
90 (40)
70 (20)
70 (50)
30 (20)

6. Vine Ave/Fruitland Ave
540 (430)390 (600)
320 (120)
500 (270)520 (300) 420 (540)

7. N Winton Way/Fruitland Ave
150 (30)
490 (580)110 (120)
90 (80)
210 (210)
20 (40) 110 (50) 390 (490)
310 (320)
290 (250)
260 (170)
40 (170)

8. N Winton Way/Bellevue Rd
Westside Blvd
SR 99 SB Ramps
dvlB edistseW dR euvelleB
Olive Avenue
Bellevue Rd
Grove Ave
Bellevue Rd
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
N Winton Way
Bellevue Rd
N Winton Way
40 (20)
380 (540)
200 (280)
50 (50)

9. SR 99 On-Ramps/Atwater Blvd
Atwater Blvd
SR 99 On-Ramps
Westside Blvd
SR 99 NB Ramps
STOP

STOP STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
E
BF
AC
BF
AC
E
D
BF
BF
D
D
BF
D
BE
BE
D
D
BE
D
D
D
D
ACC
AF
CCF
ACE
ACCF
ACE
ACE
AC
E
Olive Ave
Bellevue Rd Bellevue Rd
Fruitland Ave
Fruitland Ave Fruitland Ave
Grove AveVine Ave
N Winton Way
Shaer Rd
Bert Crane Rd
Applegate Rd
Bell Dr
Atwater Blvd
Olive Ave
Longview Rd
First St
Juniper Ave

ATWATER
99 8 1
2 3 5
5 8
9 6
7 4
Project Site Vicinity Map and Study Intersections
Figure 1
ea
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 1
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 2
WC22-3940_X_Volumes
# Study Intersection
XX (YY) AM (PM) Peak Hour Trac Volumes Signalized Intersection STOP Stop Sign Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 1
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 2

Page 320 of 498 ends

Existing Conditions
Lane Configurations, Intersection Control, and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 2
90 (92)
48 (73) 3 (13) 4 (2)
56 (130)
89 (65)
54 (42)

1. SR 99 SB Ramps/Westside Blvd
47 (23)
0 (3)
31 (47)
39 (16)
107 (206)
141 (62)
96 (84)

2. SR 99 NB Ramps/Westside Blvd
58 (41)26 (17)
0 (1)
25 (29)
83 (165)
30 (59) 22 (28) 13 (27)
5 (6)
4 (1)
157 (77)
1 (0)

3. Olive Avenue/Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd
1 (0)8 (7)2 (1)
14 (49)
71 (123)
3 (0) 41 (23) 3 (1)
0 (0)
1 (0)
120 (55)
4 (4)

4. Grove Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
66 (112)
10 (1)
0 (0) 104 (60) 0 (0)
1 (0)
0 (0)
7 (3)
0 (0)

5. Vine Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (1)
13 (25)47 (89)
1 (5)
21 (51)
0 (1) 4 (2) 16 (20)
65 (24)
48 (8)
66 (40)
64 (31)

6. Vine Ave/Fruitland Ave
413 (326)304 (471)
249 (90)
402 (210)406 (236) 328 (423)

7. N Winton Way/Fruitland Ave
100 (24)
391 (474)107 (211)
48 (27)
139 (42)
93 (21) 22 (16) 385 (397)
243 (247)
224 (189)
123 (71)
107 (186)

8. N Winton Way/Bellevue Rd
Westside Blvd
SR 99 SB Ramps
dvlB edistseW dR euvelleB
Olive Avenue
Bellevue Rd
Grove Ave
Bellevue Rd
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
N Winton Way
Bellevue Rd
N Winton Way
24 (12)
358 (633)
467 (319)
34 (36)

9. SR 99 On-Ramps/Atwater Blvd
Atwater Blvd
SR 99 On-Ramps
Westside Blvd
SR 99 NB Ramps
STOP

STOP STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
E
BF
AC
BF
AC
E
D
BF
BF
D
D
BF
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
ACC
AF
CCF
ACE
ACCF
ACE
ACE
AC
E
Design Year No Project Conditions
Lane Configurations, Intersection Control, and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 3
130 (130)
70 (100) 10 (20) 10 (10)
80 (170)
130 (90)
70 (60)

1. SR 99 SB Ramps/Westside Blvd
60 (30)
0 (10)
40 (60)
50 (30)
160 (270)
180 (80)
140 (120)

2. SR 99 NB Ramps/Westside Blvd
80 (60)40 (30)
0 (10)
40 (40)
120 (210)
40 (80) 30 (40) 20 (40)
10 (10)
10 (10)
210 (100)
10 (0)

3. Olive Avenue/Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd
10 (0)
20 (10)10 (10)
20 (70)
100 (160)
10 (0) 60 (30) 10 (10)
0 (0)
10 (0)
160 (80)
10 (10)

4. Grove Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
90 (150)
20 (10)
0 (0) 140 (80) 0 (0)
10 (0)
0 (0)
10 (10)
0 (0)

5. Vine Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (10)
20 (40)
60 (120)
10 (10)
30 (70)
0 (10) 10 (10) 30 (30)
90 (40)
70 (20)
90 (60)
90 (40)

6. Vine Ave/Fruitland Ave
530 (420)390 (600)
320 (120)
520 (270)520 (300) 420 (540)

7. N Winton Way/Fruitland Ave
130 (40)
500 (610)140 (270)
70 (40)
180 (60)
120 (30) 30 (30) 490 (510)
310 (320)
290 (250)
160 (100)
140 (240)

8. N Winton Way/Bellevue Rd
Westside Blvd
SR 99 SB Ramps
dvlB edistseW dR euvelleB
Olive Avenue
Bellevue Rd
Grove Ave
Bellevue Rd
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
N Winton Way
Bellevue Rd
N Winton Way
40 (20)
460 (810)
600 (410)
50 (50)

9. SR 99 On-Ramps/Atwater Blvd
Atwater Blvd
SR 99 On-Ramps
Westside Blvd
SR 99 NB Ramps
STOP

STOP STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
E
BF
AC
BF
AC
E
D
BF
BF
D
D
BF
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
ACC
AF
CCF
ACE
ACCF
ACE
ACE
AC
E
Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 1) Conditions
Lane Configurations, Intersection Control, and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 4
140 (160)
60 (70) 10 (20) 10 (10)
150 (410)
130 (100)
70 (60)

1. SR 99 SB Ramps/Westside Blvd
20 (20)
0 (10)
40 (60)
50 (30)
240 (540)
540 (200)
180 (140)

2. SR 99 NB Ramps/Westside Blvd
80 (60)40 (30)
0 (10)
40 (40)
200 (480)
40 (80) 30 (40) 20 (40)
10 (10)
10 (10)
610 (240)
10 (0)

3. Olive Avenue/Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd
10 (0)
20 (10)10 (10)
10 (40)
190 (460)
10 (0) 40 (20) 10 (10)
0 (0)
10 (0)
580 (230)
10 (10)

4. Grove Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
60 (90)
140 (370)
0 (0) 80 (60) 0 (0)
10 (0)
0 (0)
490 (180)
0 (0)

5. Vine Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (10)
20 (40)30 (60)
10 (10)
20 (40)
0 (10) 10 (10) 30 (30)
90 (40)
70 (20)
70 (50)
30 (20)

6. Vine Ave/Fruitland Ave
540 (430)390 (600)
320 (120)
500 (270)520 (300) 420 (540)

7. N Winton Way/Fruitland Ave
150 (30)
490 (580)110 (120)
90 (80)
210 (210)
20 (40) 110 (50) 390 (490)
310 (320)
290 (250)
260 (170)
40 (170)

8. N Winton Way/Bellevue Rd
Westside Blvd
SR 99 SB Ramps
dvlB edistseW dR euvelleB
Olive Avenue
Bellevue Rd
Grove Ave
Bellevue Rd
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
N Winton Way
Bellevue Rd
N Winton Way
40 (20)
380 (540)
200 (280)
50 (50)

9. SR 99 On-Ramps/Atwater Blvd
Atwater Blvd
SR 99 On-Ramps
Westside Blvd
SR 99 NB Ramps
STOP

STOP STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
E
BF
AC
BF
AC
E
D
BF
BF
D
D
BF
D
BE
BE
D
D
BE
D
D
D
D
ACC
AF
CCF
ACE
ACCF
ACE
ACE
AC
E
Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 2) Conditions
Lane Configurations, Intersection Control, and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 5
140 (160)
60 (70) 10 (20) 10 (10)
150 (410)
140 (100)
70 (60)

1. SR 99 SB Ramps/Westside Blvd
20 (20)
0 (10)
40 (60)
50 (30)
240 (540)
540 (200)
190 (140)

2. SR 99 NB Ramps/Westside Blvd
80 (60)40 (30)
0 (10)
40 (40)
200 (480)
40 (80) 30 (40) 20 (40)
10 (10)
10 (10)
620 (240)
10 (0)

3. Olive Avenue/Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd
10 (0)
20 (10)10 (10)
10 (40)
190 (460)
10 (0) 40 (20) 10 (10)
0 (0)
10 (0)
590 (230)
10 (10)

4. Grove Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
60 (90)
140 (370)
0 (0) 90 (60) 0 (0)
10 (0)
0 (0)
490 (180)
0 (0)

5. Vine Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (10)
20 (40)30 (60)
10 (10)
20 (40)
0 (10) 10 (10) 30 (30)
90 (40)
70 (20)
70 (50)
40 (20)

6. Vine Ave/Fruitland Ave
540 (430)390 (600)
320 (120)
500 (270)520 (300) 420 (540)

7. N Winton Way/Fruitland Ave
150 (30)
490 (580)110 (120)
90 (80)
210 (210)
20 (40) 110 (50) 390 (490)
310 (320)
290 (250)
260 (170)
40 (170)

8. N Winton Way/Bellevue Rd
Westside Blvd
SR 99 SB Ramps
dvlB edistseW dR euvelleB
Olive Avenue
Bellevue Rd
Grove Ave
Bellevue Rd
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
N Winton Way
Bellevue Rd
N Winton Way
40 (20)
380 (540)
200 (280)
50 (50)

9. SR 99 On-Ramps/Atwater Blvd
Atwater Blvd
SR 99 On-Ramps
Westside Blvd
SR 99 NB Ramps
STOP

STOP STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
E
BF
AC
BF
AC
E
D
BF
BF
D
D
BF
D
BE
BE
D
D
BE
D
D
D
D
ACC
AF
CCF
ACE
ACCF
ACE
ACE
AC
E
lvd
Olive Ave
Bellevue Rd Bellevue Rd
Fruitland Ave
Fruitland Ave Fruitland Ave
Grove AveVine Ave
N Winton Way
Shaer Rd
Bert Crane Rd
Applegate Rd
Bell Dr
Atwater Blvd
Olive Ave
Longview Rd
First St
Juniper Ave
ATWA
99 J18 1
2 3 5
5 8
9 6
7 4
Project Site Vicinity Map and Study Intersections
Figure 1
40_1_StudyArea
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 1
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 2
WC22-3940_X_Volumes
# Study Intersection
XX (YY) AM (PM) Peak Hour Trac Volumes Signalized Intersection STOP Stop Sign Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 1
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 2
Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 2) Conditions
Lane Configurations, Intersection Control, and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 5
140 (160)
60 (70) 10 (20) 10 (10)
150 (410)
140 (100)
70 (60)

1. SR 99 SB Ramps/Westside Blvd
20 (20)
0 (10)
40 (60)
50 (30)
240 (540)
540 (200)
190 (140)

2. SR 99 NB Ramps/Westside Blvd
80 (60)40 (30)
0 (10)
40 (40)
200 (480)
40 (80) 30 (40) 20 (40)
10 (10)
10 (10)
620 (240)
10 (0)

3. Olive Avenue/Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd
10 (0)
20 (10)10 (10)
10 (40)
190 (460)
10 (0) 40 (20) 10 (10)
0 (0)
10 (0)
590 (230)
10 (10)

4. Grove Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
60 (90)
140 (370)
0 (0) 90 (60) 0 (0)
10 (0)
0 (0)
490 (180)
0 (0)

5. Vine Ave/Bellevue Rd
0 (10)
20 (40)30 (60)
10 (10)
20 (40)
0 (10) 10 (10) 30 (30)
90 (40)
70 (20)
70 (50)
40 (20)

6. Vine Ave/Fruitland Ave
540 (430)390 (600)
320 (120)
500 (270)520 (300) 420 (540)

7. N Winton Way/Fruitland Ave
150 (30)
490 (580)110 (120)
90 (80)
210 (210)
20 (40) 110 (50) 390 (490)
310 (320)
290 (250)
260 (170)
40 (170)

8. N Winton Way/Bellevue Rd
Westside Blvd
SR 99 SB Ramps
dvlB edistseW dR euvelleB
Olive Avenue
Bellevue Rd
Grove Ave
Bellevue Rd
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave
N Winton Way
Bellevue Rd
N Winton Way
40 (20)
380 (540)
200 (280)
50 (50)

9. SR 99 On-Ramps/Atwater Blvd
Atwater Blvd
SR 99 On-Ramps
Westside Blvd
SR 99 NB Ramps
STOP

STOP STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
E
BF
AC
BF
AC
E
D
BF
BF
D
D
BF
D
BE
BE
D
D
BE
D
D
D
D
ACC
AF
CCF
ACE
ACCF
ACE
ACE
AC
E
Olive Ave
Bellevue Rd Bellevue Rd
Fruitland Ave
Fruitland Ave Fruitland Ave
Grove AveVine Ave
N Winton Way
Shaer Rd
Bert Crane Rd
Applegate Rd
Bell Dr
Atwater Blvd
Olive Ave
Longview Rd
First St
Juniper Ave
ATWA
99 J18 1
2 3 5
5 8
9 6
7 4
Project Site Vicinity Map and Study Intersections
Figure 1
tudyArea
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 1
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 2
WC22-3940_X_Volumes
# Study Intersection
XX (YY) AM (PM) Peak Hour Trac Volumes Signalized Intersection STOP Stop Sign Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 1
Bellevue Road Design
Alternative 2

Page 321 of 498 ends

Ed Noriega and Alyssa Nishikawa
June 8, 2023

Page 12 of 21 ends

Traffic Engineering Performance Assessment Findings
Traffic operations for the study area were analyzed using the Synchro 11 software package.

Synchro 11 uses the procedures outlined in the Transportation Research Board’s (TRB) Highway Capacity Manual, 6
th Edition (HCM, 6th Edition). The analysis outputs of control delay are correlated to a descriptive term known as Level of Service (LOS). LOS is a measure of traffic operating conditions, ranging from LOS A (indicating free flow traffic conditions with little or no delay) to LOS F (representing over-saturated conditions where traffic flows exceed design capacity, resulting in long queues and delays).

Signalized Intersections
The HCM method calculates control delay at an intersection based on inputs such as traffic volumes, lane geometry, signal phasing and timing, pedestrian crossing times, and peak hour factors. Control delay is defined as the delay directly associated with the traffic control device (i.e., a traffic signal) and specifically includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. The relationship between LOS and delay for signalized intersections is summarized in Table 2.

Unsignalized Intersections
For unsignalized intersections, operations are defined by the average control delay per vehicle (measured in seconds). The control delay incorporates delay associated with deceleration, acceleration, stopping, and moving up in queue. Table 3 summarizes the relationship between LOS and delay for unsignalized intersections. At side street stop-controlled intersections, the delay is calculated for each stop-controlled movement, the left turn movement from the major street, as well as the intersection average. The intersection average delay and highest movement/approach delay are reported for side street stop-controlled intersections.

Page 322 of 498 ends

Ed Noriega and Alyssa Nishikawa
June 8, 2023

Page 13 of 21 ends

Table 2: Signalized Intersection LOS Criteria
Level of
Service Description Delay in Seconds
A
Progression is extremely favorable and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay.
≤ 10.0
B
Progression is good, cycle lengths are short, or both. More vehicles stop than with LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay.
> 10.1 to

20.0 C
Higher congestion may result from fair progression, longer cycle lengths, or both.

Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level, though many still pass through the intersection without stopping.
> 20.1 to

35.0 D
The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high V/C ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable.
> 35.1 to

55.0 E
This level is considered by many agencies to be the limit of acceptable delay.

These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. > 55.1 to

80.0 F
This level is considered unacceptable with oversaturation, which is when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. This level may also occur at high V/C ratios below 1.0 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be contributing factors to such delay levels. > 80.0
Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 6
th Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2017.

Table 3: Unsignalized Intersection LOS Criteria
Level of Service Description Delay in Seconds
A Little or no delays ≤ 10.0
B Short traffic delays > 10.1 to 15.0
C Average traffic delays > 15.1 to 25.0
D Long traffic delays > 25.1 to 35.0
E Very long traffic delays > 35.1 to 50.0
F Extreme traffic, delays where intersection capacity exceeded > 50.0 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 6
th Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2017.

Page 323 of 498 ends

Ed Noriega and Alyssa Nishikawa
June 8, 2023

Page 14 of 21 ends

Existing Conditions
Intersection Operations
The Existing Conditions LOS and delay are presented in Table 4. Detailed intersection LOS calculation worksheets are presented in Attachment D.

As illustrated in Table 4, all the study intersections operate at LOS C or better.

Table 4: Existing Conditions Peak Hour Intersection LOS Summary Intersection Control1
Peak
Hour2 Delay3 LOS

1. Westside Boulevard/SR 99 Southbound Ramps SSSC AM
PM
3 (11)
5 (12)
A (B)
A (B)

2. Westside Boulevard/SR 99 Northbound Ramps SSSC AM
PM
3 (12)
2 (11)
A (B)
A (B)

3. Westside Boulevard/Bellevue Road/Olive Avenue SSSC AM PM
4 (13)
4 (13)
A (B)
A (B)

4. Bellevue Road/Grove Avenue SSSC AM
PM
3 (11)
3 (11)
A (B)
A (B)

5. Bellevue Road/Vine Avenue AWSC AM
PM
8 8
A
A

6. Vine Avenue/Fruitland Avenue AWSC AM
PM
8 8
A
A

7. Fruitland Avenue/North Winton Way Signalized AM
PM
7 7
A
A

8. Bellevue Road/North Winton Way Signalized AM
PM
20 19
C
B

9. Atwater Boulevard/SR 99 Northbound Ramps Uncontrolled AM PM
1 (7)
1 (7)
A (A)
A (A)
Notes:

1. Traffic control type (SSSC = Side Street Stop-Controlled; AWSC = All-Way Stop-Controlled).

2. AM = Weekday morning peak hour, PM = Weekday evening peak hour.

3. Whole intersection average delay reported for signalized and all-way stop-controlled intersections. Side street stop-controlled delay presented as Whole Intersection Average Delay (Worst Movement Delay). Delay calculated per HCM 6
th methodologies.

Bold indicates at or over capacity operations.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2023.

Collision History
Caltrans staff provided collision data at the five SR 99 freeway ramp facilities for the most recent available three-year period (not impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic), from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019, as summarized in Table 5. None of the reported collisions at these ramps

Page 324 of 498 ends

Ed Noriega and Alyssa Nishikawa
June 8, 2023

Page 15 of 21 ends

were fatal. During this period, the northbound off-ramp to Bellevue Road, northbound on-ramp from Bellevue Road, southbound off-ramp to Bellevue Road/Westside Boulevard, and southbound on-ramp from Bellevue Road/Westside Boulevard had a total of two collisions combined. The northbound on-ramp from Atwater Boulevard had a total of four collisions. The northbound off-ramp to Bellevue Road, southbound on-ramp from Bellevue Road/Westside Boulevard, and northbound on-ramp from Atwater Boulevard experienced a total rate of fatal and injury-related collisions that is above average for similar facilities statewide. All study intersections experienced a total rate of collisions that is above average for similar facilities statewide.

Over-turn type collisions, which accounted for about 30 percent of all reported collisions, were the most frequent type of reported collisions along the SR 99 ramps. Rear-end, side-swipe, and hit object type collisions, which are generally due to driver’s inattention, unsafe speeds, or lane changing in recurring traffic congestion, accounted for about 40 percent of all reported collisions on the study intersections.

Table 5: Collision History – January 2017 through December 2019 Facility
Number of
Collisions
Collision Rate
(collisions/million vehicle-miles)
Total Fatal
Fatal
+
Injury
Actual State Average
Fatality
Fatal
+
Injury
Total Fatality
Fatal
+
Injury
Total
Northbound Off-Ramp to Bellevue
Road (PM MER-24.807)
2 0 2 0.000 1.83 1.83 0.003 0.38 1.04
Northbound On-Ramp from
Bellevue Road (PM MER-25.118)
2 0 0 0.000 0.00 1.83 0.002 0.23 0.63
Southbound Off-Ramp to Bellevue
Road (PM MER-25.238)
2 0 0 0.000 0.00 1.83 0.003 0.38 1.04
Southbound On-Ramp from
Bellevue Road (PM MER-24.862)
2 0 1 0.000 0.91 1.83 0.002 0.23 0.63
Northbound On-Ramp from
Atwater Boulevard (PM MER023.733)4 0 2 0.000 0.72 1.44 0.002 0.23 0.63 Note: Bold and highlighted denotes locations that exceed the statewide average.

Source: Caltrans District 10 TASAS data between 1/1/2017 and 12/31/2019.

A quantitative collision analysis was prepared using collision data from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) collected over the three-year period (January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019) consistent with the Caltrans collision data three-year period. The study locations for this assessment include the intersections denoted in Table 1. Over the three-year

Page 325 of 498 ends

Ed Noriega and Alyssa Nishikawa
June 8, 2023

Page 16 of 21 ends

period, there were 165 total collisions with reported injuries or property damage at the study intersections.

Of reported collisions in the three-year evaluation period within the study area, 1 collision was fatal, 6 collisions were severe, 14 were non-severe visible injury, 27 collisions were non-severe complaint of pain injury, and 117 collisions were property damage only. Table 6 summarizes the collision severity at the study intersections.

Table 6: Collision by Severity
Intersection Fatal Severe Moderate Minor PDO Total

1. Westside Boulevard/SR 99 Southbound Ramps 0 3 4 7 46 60

2. Westside Boulevard/SR 99 Northbound Ramps 1 1 7 10 42 61

3. Westside Boulevard/Bellevue Road/Olive Avenue 0 0 0 0 4 4

4. Bellevue Road/Grove Avenue 0 0 0 0 1 1

5. Bellevue Road/Vine Avenue 0 0 1 0 0 1

6. Vine Avenue/Fruitland Avenue 0 0 0 3 1 4

7. Fruitland Avenue/North Winton Way 0 2 1 4 14 21

8. Bellevue Road/North Winton Way 0 0 0 3 8 11

9. Atwater Boulevard/SR 99 Northbound Ramps 0 0 1 0 1 2 Total 1 6 14 27 117 165
PDO = Property Damage Only.

Source: SWITRS data between 1/1/2017 and 12/31/2019.

Design Year (2050) Intersection Operations
Design Year No Project and Plus Project Conditions LOS and delay under are presented in Table

7. Detailed intersection LOS calculation worksheets are presented in Attachment D.

Page 326 of 498 ends

Ed Noriega and Alyssa Nishikawa
June 8, 2023

Page 17 of 21 ends

Table 7: Design Year (2050) Peak Hour Intersection LOS Summary Intersection Control1
Peak
Hour2
Design Year 2050
No Project
Conditions
Plus Project
Alternative 1
Conditions
Plus Project
Alternative 2
Conditions
Delay3 LOS Delay3 LOS Delay3 LOS

1. Westside Boulevard/SR
99 Southbound Ramps SSSC AMPM
4 (14)
6 (16)
A (B)
A (C)
6 (17)
26 (50)
A (C)
D (F)
6 (17)
26 (50)
A (C)
D (F)

2. Westside Boulevard/SR
99 Northbound Ramps SSSC AMPM
3 (14)
2 (13)
A (B)
A (B)
1 (19)
2 (20)
A (C)
A (C)
1 (19)
2 (20)
A (C)
A (C)

3. Westside
Boulevard/Bellevue
Road/Olive Avenue

SSSC AM
PM
5 (18)
5 (17)
A (C)
A (C)
11 (83)
6 (46)
B (F)
A (E)
11 (89)
6 (46)
B (F)
A (E)

4. Bellevue Road/Grove
Avenue SSSC AMPM
3 (13)
3 (13)
A (B)
A (B)
2 (20)
1 (19)
A (C)
A (C)
2 (20)
1 (19)
A (C)
A (C)

5. Bellevue Road/Vine
Avenue
AWSC/
SSSC4
AM
PM
8 8
A
A
2 (12)
2 (9)
A (B)
A (A)
2 (12)
2 (9)
A (B)
A (A)

6. Vine Avenue/Fruitland
Avenue AWSC AMPM
9 9
A
A
8 8
A
A
9 8
A
A

7. Fruitland Avenue/North
Winton Way Signalized AMPM
8 7
A
A
8 7
A
A
8 7
A
A

8. Bellevue Road/North
Winton Way Signalized AMPM
24 25
C
C
26 25
C
C
26 25
C
C

9. Atwater Boulevard/SR 99
Northbound Ramps
Uncontroll
ed
AM
PM
1 (7)
1 (7)
A (A)
A (A)
1 (7)
1 (7)
A (A)
A (A)
1 (7)
1 (7)
A (A)
A (A)
Notes:

1. Traffic control type (Signal = Signalized; SSSC = Side Street Stop-Controlled; AWSC = All-Way Stop-Controlled; Uncontrol = Uncontrolled).

2. AM = Weekday morning peak hour, PM = Weekday evening peak hour.

3. Whole intersection average delay reported for signalized and all-way stop-controlled intersections. Side street stop-controlled delay presented as Whole Intersection Average Delay (Worst Movement Delay). Delay calculated per HCM 6
th methodologies.

4. Intersection 5 is AWSC under No Project Conditions, and SSSC under Project Conditions.

Bold indicates at or over capacity operations.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2023.

As illustrated in Table 7, all study intersections operate at LOS D or better during Design Year No Project and Plus Project Conditions except for the following 2 intersections during Plus Project Conditions.

Page 327 of 498 ends

Ed Noriega and Alyssa Nishikawa
June 8, 2023

Page 18 of 21 ends

• Westside Boulevard/SR 99 Southbound Ramps intersection operates at worst movement delay LOS F during Plus Project Conditions. The project increases the side street stopcontrolled approach demand resulting in degrading LOS results. • Westside Boulevard/Bellevue Road/Olive Avenue intersection operates at worst movement delay LOS F during Plus Project Conditions. The project increases the main street demand causing less traffic gaps for the side street resulting in degrading LOS results.

The final intersection geometry and phasing will be established during the PA&ED phase when the Project design is advanced further, and detailed traffic forecasts are developed.

Qualitative Vehicle-Miles Traveled (VMT) and Travel Time Analysis The current Bellevue Road closure between Vine Avenue and Gipson Street forces drivers to reroute around the Bellevue Road closure, including using other SR 99 interchanges. The Fruitland Avenue detour north of the current Bellevue Road closure is approximately 2.9 miles in length between the Bellevue Road/North Winton Way intersection in central Atwater and the SR 99/Westside Boulevard interchange. Alternatively, the North Winton Way detour that uses other SR 99 interchanges south of the current Bellevue Road closure is approximately 3.2 miles in length between the Bellevue Road/North Winton Way intersection in central Atwater and the SR 99/Westside Boulevard interchange.

The Project is restoring the direct route of 1.9 miles for travelers between central Atwater and the SR 99/Westside Boulevard interchange. The shorter route provides travel time savings and well as VMT reductions. Additionally, providing a direct route from the SR 99/Westside Boulevard interchange to central Atwater would be beneficial to existing community members and accommodate future local development as envisioned in the upcoming General Plan Update for the City. Therefore, the project is providing travel time savings and VMT reductions (consistent with state goals).

Future PA&ED Traffic Scope
Per Article 5 of the PDPM prepared by Caltrans, a traffic scope is presented for the PA&ED phase.

Prior to initiation of the PA&ED phase, the traffic scope should be reviewed to ensure it is still acceptable to the Project Development Team (PDT) members. Changes and/or modifications to the traffic scope can be made prior to initiating the PA&ED phase. The detailed traffic analysis that will be performed during the PA&ED phase will be used to better support the purpose and need of the Project.

Analysis Years and Study Periods
The following analysis years and study periods should be evaluated:

Page 328 of 498 ends

Ed Noriega and Alyssa Nishikawa
June 8, 2023

Page 19 of 21 ends

• Analysis Years: Existing Conditions, Opening Year (2030 or earlier), and Design Year (2050) • Study Periods: Weekday AM (peak hour between 7:00 to 9:00 AM) and Weekday PM (peak hour between 4:00 to 6:00 PM)
Study Area
Based on the location of the Project and the potential to affect traffic operations, the following intersections along Bellevue Road/Westside Boulevard and North Winton Way corridors should be evaluated.

1. Westside Boulevard/SR 99 Southbound Ramps

2. Westside Boulevard/SR 99 Northbound Ramps

3. Westside Boulevard-Bellevue Road/Olive Avenue

4. Bellevue Road/Grove Avenue

5. Bellevue Road/Vine Avenue

6. Vine Avenue/Fruitland Avenue

7. Fruitland Avenue/North Winton Way

8. Bellevue Road/North Winton Way

9. Atwater Boulevard/SR 99 Northbound Ramps
Analysis Tool and Measures of Effectiveness
The intersection analysis tool should be consistent with the methodologies presented in the Highway Capacity Manual, 6
th Edition. Consideration should be given to modeling the intersections in microsimulation (e.g., SimTraffic) to better account for the interaction of closely spaced intersections and turn pocket overflow. The measures of effectiveness (MOEs) should include the following for each intersection: 1) intersection delay; 2) level of service; and 3) 95th percentile queue lengths. In addition, the following networkwide MOEs should be considered depending on the analysis tool selected:
• Vehicle Demand
• Vehicles Served
• % Demand Served
• Total Stops
• Stop/Vehicle
• Vehicle-hours of delay (VHD)
• Vehicle-miles traveled (VMT)
• Vehicle-hours of travel (VHT)
• Average Speed
• Fuel Used
• Total Emissions
The intersection operational analysis results should be based on a minimum of twelve SimTraffic model runs with a SimTraffic parameter setting of one hour (using four 15-minute time intervals).

If over-capacity conditions result from the analysis, a list of recommendations necessary to maintain under-capacity conditions will be provided.

Page 329 of 498 ends

Ed Noriega and Alyssa Nishikawa
June 8, 2023

Page 20 of 21 ends

Data Collection
Intersection Traffic Counts
As part of the TEPA, intersection traffic volumes collected in February 2023 were obtained from the City of Atwater for the AM peak period (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and PM peak period (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) peak periods at the study intersections identified in Table 1. If the PA&ED phase uses the 2023 counts, new counts will be collected at three locations to determine annual growth rate and then apply the growth rate to the remaining study intersections.

Collision Data
Collision data for the study area for the SR 99 corridor for the most recent three-year period should be summarized from Caltrans’ Traffic Accident Surveillance and Analysis System (TASAS).

Collision data for facilities not on the State Highway System for the most recent three-year period should be summarized from the CHP Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS).

Recommended countermeasures, using the Federal Highway Administration Crash Modification Factor Clearinghouse, will be provided for any apparent collision trends on intersections with high numbers of collisions (>5 collisions per year). The improvement measures will be developed and proposed to remedy the identified safety concerns.

Vehicle-Miles of Travel (VMT) Evaluation
The Caltrans Transportation Analysis under CEQA (TAC, September 2020) and Caltrans Transportation Analysis Framework (TAF, September 2020) provide new guidance on how to estimate the induced vehicle travel from transportation projects. Caltrans has formally adopted vehicle-miles of travel (VMT) as the transportation metric for determining project impacts for CEQA: the metric was previously level of service (LOS). The information in these Caltrans documents should be used to estimate VMT with and without the Project.

Travel Demand Forecasting
The most recent and approved version of the single-county MCAG Travel Demand Model developed for the adopted MCAG Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) should be used to develop traffic demand forecasts for the study area. The model should be locally validated to current conditions prior to developing traffic demand forecasts. The traffic forecasts from the MCAG Model should not be used to directly predict future year traffic demand forecasts; rather, changes in the demand volumes between the validated base and future year models (delta method) should be added to Existing Conditions demand volumes to determine the adjusted future year traffic forecasts.

Page 330 of 498 ends

Ed Noriega and Alyssa Nishikawa
June 8, 2023

Page 21 of 21 ends

Travel Time Analysis
The locally validated version of the single-county MCAG Travel Demand Model developed for the Travel demand forecasting analysis will be used to capture the travel times for the following routes:
• Bellevue Road/Shaffer Road intersection (Downtown Atwater) to SR 99 at Liberty Avenue Interchange.
• SR 99 at Liberty Avenue Interchange to Bellevue Road/Shaffer Road intersection (Downtown Atwater).

Intersection Signal Warrant Analysis
Fehr & Peers will use California Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Section 4C.04 to determine if the morning and afternoon peak hour traffic volumes meet the Warrant 3 (Peak Hour) requirements for traffic signal for all unsignalized study intersection.

Intersection Control Evaluation Process
As part of the Design Year traffic operations analysis an Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) evaluation should be performed at the intersections listed below to determine the most appropriate intersection control (e.g., signal, roundabout, all-way stop, etc.).

1. Westside Boulevard/SR 99 Southbound Ramps

2. Westside Boulevard/SR 99 Northbound Ramps
The intersection analysis tool should be consistent with the methodologies presented in the Highway Capacity Manual, 6
th Edition. For the Design Year, a traffic analysis comparison should be made to allow the Project team to advance one intersection control concept for each intersection.

Documentation
The following deliverables should be provided to the Project team for review and comment. The documentation should include electronic Synchro and SimTraffic files.

1. Existing Conditions Report

2. Travel Demand Model Validation and Forecasting Memorandum

3. Traffic Operations Analysis Report (TOAR)

Page 331 of 498 ends

Attachment A: Traffic Counts

Page 332 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 2 0 2 0 0 14 9 1 0 9 14 0 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 1 1 2 0 0 22 13 2 0 8 26 0 1 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 1 1 1 0 0 22 15 3 0 16 27 0 1 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 1 0 0 0 15 10 0 0 15 17 0 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 2 0 2 0 0 30 10 1 0 15 17 0 4 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 1 2 0 0 20 8 2 0 8 19 0 1 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 4 2 0 0 5 9 1 0 11 23 0 2 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 5 0 0 0 14 7 3 0 4 3 0 1 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 6 13 11 0 0 142 81 13 0 86 146 0 10 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 1 3 0 0 0 30 26 3 0 7 16 0 1 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 1 1 0 0 25 21 3 0 9 21 0 2 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 4 1 0 0 15 14 0 0 12 8 0 1 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 1 5 0 0 0 22 12 1 0 14 19 0 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 1 1 0 0 10 14 1 0 14 12 0 1 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 1 4 0 0 0 11 19 0 0 5 12 0 1 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 1 2 0 0 0 10 13 0 0 5 18 0 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 2 0 0 0 0 9 14 1 0 6 10 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 251 6 20 3 0 0 132 133 9 0 72 116 0 6 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 4 3 5 0 0 89 48 6 0 54 87 0 6 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 130 2 13 2 0 0 92 73 7 0 42 64 0 4 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.917 5.0% PM 13 2 130 0 0.824
PM 0.937 3.1% AM 3 4 56 0 0.75
PHF 0.737 0.856
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 87 64
92 89 54 42
73 48 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.82 0.803 PHF
##### 0 0 0 0 AM
##### 0 0 0 0 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Page 1 of 3 ends

Westside Blvd
Northbound Westbound
Westside Blvd
SR 99 Southbound Ramps
SR 99 Southbound Ramps
Turning Movement Report
Westside Blvd @ SR 99 SB Ramps
Merced
Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Clear

37.3609
-120.6495

Page 333 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 0 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 0 0 AM 0 0 0 0 Peds <> 0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0 Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
Westside Blvd @ SR 99 SB Ramps 37.3609
Merced -120.6495
Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
SR 99 Southbound Ramps
Westside Blvd Westside Blvd
SR 99 Southbound Ramps Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes

Page 334 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE
Westside Blvd / Westside Blvd
Clear
One-Way Stop

COMMENTS

Page 3 of 3 ends

N/A
Turning Movement Report
Westside Blvd @ SR 99 SB Ramps
Merced
Tuesday, February 7, 2023
SR 99 Southbound Ramps / SR 99 Southbound Ramps

Page 335 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 7 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 16 0 1 0 0 16 37 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 12 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 34 0 2 0 0 23 41 1 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 15 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 19 0 0 0 0 28 44 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 10 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 18 0 2 0 0 22 28 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 10 0 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 36 0 1 0 0 23 28 3 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 7 1 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 29 0 2 0 0 21 26 2 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 13 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10 0 2 0 0 20 27 2 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 1 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 16 0 2 0 0 6 15 1 TOTAL 0 75 4 55 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 178 0 12 0 0 159 246 9 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 11 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 49 0 1 0 0 13 12 1 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 10 0 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 49 0 1 0 0 21 17 1 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 2 0 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 53 0 1 0 0 18 8 1 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 6 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 51 0 0 0 0 27 14 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 5 2 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 41 0 0 0 0 18 23 1 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 5 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 41 0 0 0 0 11 24 2 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 9 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 34 0 0 0 0 14 16 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 6 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 31 0 1 0 0 7 10 0 TOTAL 0 54 4 75 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 349 0 4 0 0 129 124 6
PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 47 0 31 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 107 0 5 0 0 96 141 4 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 0 23 3 47 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 194 0 2 0 0 84 62 3 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.907 2.8% PM 0 0 0 0 #####
PM 0.933 1.9% AM 0 0 0 0 #####
PHF 0.921 0.793
AM PM
0 0 141 62
16 39 96 84
194 107 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.823 0.89 PHF

0.929 0 47 0 31 AM

0.830 0 23 3 47 PM
Turning Movement Report
Westside Blvd @ SR 99 NB Ramps
Merced
Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Clear

37.3616
-120.6463

Page 1 of 3 ends

Westside Blvd
Northbound Westbound
Westside Blvd
SR 99 Northbound Ramps
SR 99 Northbound Ramps
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Page 336 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 0 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 0 0 AM 0 0 0 0 Peds <> 0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0 Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
SR 99 Northbound Ramps
Westside Blvd Westside Blvd
SR 99 Northbound Ramps Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
Westside Blvd @ SR 99 NB Ramps 37.3616
Merced -120.6463
Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Clear

Page 337 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

CYCLE TIME N/A CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Westside Blvd @ SR 99 NB Ramps
Merced
Tuesday, February 7, 2023
SR 99 Northbound Ramps / SR 99 Northbound Ramps
Westside Blvd / Westside Blvd
Clear
One-Way Stop

COMMENTS

Page 3 of 3 ends
Page 338 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 8 4 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 10 11 3 1 0 0 46 0 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 20 5 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 30 6 3 0 0 40 2 1 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 17 4 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 5 14 6 0 0 1 45 0 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 6 12 0 0 0 2 7 8 0 0 8 9 6 0 0 0 34 0 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 15 5 0 1 0 3 4 6 1 0 7 26 12 0 0 0 27 2 1 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 16 10 0 1 0 1 4 10 0 0 9 15 10 2 0 0 21 0 1 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 12 3 0 0 0 1 2 9 0 0 6 8 1 2 0 0 24 3 1 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 5 6 0 0 0 1 6 4 1 0 4 11 6 1 0 0 12 0 0 TOTAL 0 99 49 0 3 0 8 27 47 2 0 54 124 50 9 0 1 249 7 4 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 8 4 0 0 0 2 8 4 0 0 5 31 20 1 0 0 12 0 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 12 4 0 0 0 1 9 3 0 0 9 40 8 2 0 0 22 0 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 5 3 0 0 0 3 5 11 1 0 5 44 17 2 0 0 11 1 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 8 3 0 0 0 2 9 6 0 0 6 39 18 0 0 0 21 0 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 16 7 1 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 9 26 16 0 0 0 17 0 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 9 1 1 0 0 2 7 5 0 0 5 28 17 0 0 0 22 0 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 7 2 0 0 0 1 3 6 0 0 5 27 8 0 0 0 16 0 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 5 5 0 0 0 2 5 2 0 0 4 22 10 2 0 0 10 0 0 TOTAL 0 70 29 2 0 0 13 50 45 1 0 48 257 114 7 0 0 131 1 0 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 58 26 0 2 0 5 13 22 1 0 25 79 30 3 0 1 146 4 2 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 0 41 17 1 0 0 6 27 28 1 0 29 149 59 4 0 0 71 1 0 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.930 2.0% PM 28 27 6 0 0.803
PM 0.958 1.2% AM 22 13 5 0 0.588
PHF 0.898 0.744
AM PM
0 0 4 1
29 25 146 71
149 79 1 0
59 30 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.821 0.818 PHF

0.84 0 58 26 0 AM

0.615 0 41 17 1 PM
Turning Movement Report
Westside Blvd @ Olive Ave
Merced
Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Clear

37.3608
-120.6436

Page 1 of 3 ends

Westside Blvd
Northbound Westbound
Westside Blvd
Olive Ave
Olive Ave
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Page 339 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 0 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 0 0 AM 0 0 0 0 Peds <> 0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0 Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Olive Ave
Westside Blvd Westside Blvd
Olive Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
Westside Blvd @ Olive Ave 37.3608
Merced -120.6436
Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Clear

Page 340 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

CYCLE TIME N/A CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Westside Blvd @ Olive Ave
Merced
Tuesday, February 7, 2023
Olive Ave / Olive Ave
Westside Blvd / Westside Blvd
Clear
Two-Way Stop

COMMENTS

Page 3 of 3 ends
Page 341 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 15 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 7 19 1 0 0 1 32 0 1 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 14 0 0 2 15 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 12 0 0 0 2 20 1 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 8 0 0 4 22 2 0 0 1 23 0 1 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 8 1 0 2 13 0 1 0 1 12 0 0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 16 0 0 1 8 0 1 0 0 12 0 1 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 2 10 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 TOTAL 0 2 12 2 1 0 0 6 86 1 0 20 109 3 2 0 5 165 1 3
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 12 22 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 16 29 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 11 37 0 2 0 3 10 0 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 10 33 0 0 0 1 16 0 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 18 1 0 0 2 15 0 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 24 1 0 0 0 18 0 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 6 24 0 0 0 1 11 0 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 19 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 11 2 0 0 0 2 40 0 0 71 206 2 2 0 8 98 0 0
PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 1 8 2 1 0 0 3 41 0 0 14 68 3 0 0 4 103 1 2 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 1 23 0 0 49 121 0 2 0 4 49 0 0 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.861 1.2% PM 23 1 0 0 0.6
PM 0.911 0.8% AM 41 3 0 0 0.733
PHF 0.885 0.759
AM PM
0 0 1 0
49 14 103 49
121 68 4 4
0 3 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.818 0.779 PHF

0.55 0 1 8 2 AM

0.667 0 0 7 1 PM
Turning Movement Report
Bellevue Rd @ Grove Ave
Merced
Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Clear

37.3604
-120.6413

Page 1 of 3 ends

Bellevue Rd
Northbound Westbound
Bellevue Rd
Grove Ave
Grove Ave
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Page 342 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 0 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 0 0 AM 0 0 0 0 Peds <> 0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0 Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Grove Ave
Bellevue Rd Bellevue Rd
Grove Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
Bellevue Rd @ Grove Ave 37.3604
Merced -120.6413
Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Clear

Page 343 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

CYCLE TIME N/A CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Bellevue Rd @ Grove Ave
Merced
Tuesday, February 7, 2023
Grove Ave / Grove Ave
Bellevue Rd / Bellevue Rd
Clear
Two-Way Stop

COMMENTS

Page 3 of 3 ends
Page 344 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 34 0 0 19 5 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 11 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 22 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 163 1 0 101 16 0 3 0 0 9 1 4
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 32 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 22 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 0 0 196 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 0
PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 104 0 0 66 10 0 3 0 0 7 0 4 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 112 1 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.770 3.7% PM 60 0 0 0 0.882
PM 0.846 0.6% AM 104 0 1 0 0.75
PHF 0.831 0.76
AM PM
0 0 0 0
112 66 7 3
1 10 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.583 0.75 PHF
##### 0 0 0 0 AM
##### 0 0 0 0 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Page 1 of 3 ends

Bellevue Rd
Northbound Westbound
Bellevue Rd
Vine Ave
Turning Movement Report
Bellevue Rd @ Vine Ave
Merced
Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Clear

37.3604
-120.6321

Page 345 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 1 PM 0 0 0 1
PM Peak Total 0 1 AM 0 0 0 0 Peds <> 0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
1 0 Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
Bellevue Rd @ Vine Ave 37.3604
Merced -120.6321
Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Vine Ave
Bellevue Rd Bellevue Rd
0

Page 2 of 3 ends

Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes

Page 346 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE
Bellevue Rd / Bellevue Rd
Clear
Two-Way Stop

COMMENTS

Page 3 of 3 ends

N/A
Turning Movement Report
Bellevue Rd @ Vine Ave
Merced
Tuesday, February 7, 2023
Vine Ave /

Page 347 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 2 5 0 0 4 7 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 22 15 3 1 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 2 17 0 0 6 6 1 0 0 1 9 0 1 0 28 10 7 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 5 10 0 0 8 6 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 22 20 9 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 1 10 0 0 17 3 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 18 17 6 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 3 12 0 0 13 4 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 14 15 14 0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 4 15 0 0 27 3 0 0 0 0 9 0 1 0 10 14 19 1 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 3 4 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 12 17 7 1 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 3 6 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 4 8 1 0 TOTAL 0 0 23 79 0 0 79 31 7 0 0 3 42 0 3 0 130 116 66 3 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 1 1 19 0 0 5 4 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 9 3 2 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 10 17 0 0 5 6 2 1 0 3 11 0 0 0 8 14 2 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 7 23 1 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 15 1 0 0 4 9 0 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 7 30 0 0 9 5 0 0 0 2 13 0 0 0 10 14 4 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 4 14 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 15 2 3 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 5 22 0 0 4 3 1 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 14 8 3 1 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 4 17 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 6 6 3 1 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 5 16 0 0 6 2 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 TOTAL 0 1 43 158 1 0 43 31 3 1 0 6 80 1 0 0 69 62 17 2
PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 13 47 0 0 65 16 4 0 0 1 21 0 1 0 64 66 48 1 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 1 25 89 1 0 24 20 2 1 0 5 51 1 0 0 31 40 8 0 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.854 0.6% PM 2 20 24 0 0.821
PM 0.790 0.7% AM 4 16 65 0 0.708
PHF 0.891 0.611
AM PM
0 0 48 8
5 1 66 40
51 21 64 31
1 0 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.873 0.705 PHF

0.789 0 0 13 47 AM

0.777 0 1 25 89 PM
Turning Movement Report
Fruitland Ave @ Vine Ave
Merced
Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Clear

37.3676
-120.6320

Page 1 of 3 ends

Fruitland Ave
Northbound Westbound
Fruitland Ave
Vine Ave
Vine Ave
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Page 348 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 0 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 0 0 AM 0 0 0 0 Peds <> 0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0 Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave Fruitland Ave
Vine Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
Fruitland Ave @ Vine Ave 37.3676
Merced -120.6320
Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Clear

Page 349 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

CYCLE TIME N/A CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Fruitland Ave @ Vine Ave
Merced
Tuesday, February 7, 2023
Vine Ave / Vine Ave
Fruitland Ave / Fruitland Ave
Clear
All-Way Stop

COMMENTS

Page 3 of 3 ends
Page 350 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 30 33 0 1 0 0 45 2 7 0 11 0 35 1 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 52 67 0 3 0 0 67 59 5 0 45 0 65 3 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 74 106 0 2 0 0 72 61 6 0 58 0 93 1 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 66 71 0 4 0 0 79 88 2 0 60 0 85 1 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 128 62 0 1 0 0 97 126 7 0 63 0 100 1 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 145 65 0 6 0 0 80 131 1 0 68 0 124 1 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 24 65 0 2 0 0 68 24 3 0 48 0 63 5 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 23 52 0 3 0 0 67 16 0 0 6 0 25 1 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 542 521 0 22 0 0 575 507 31 0 359 0 590 14 0 0 0 0 0 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 55 111 0 3 0 0 160 30 4 0 27 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 41 134 0 4 0 0 127 27 3 0 29 0 66 1 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 58 132 0 1 0 0 135 28 2 0 23 0 72 1 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 55 131 0 2 0 0 129 22 0 0 35 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 52 142 0 1 0 0 123 42 2 0 27 0 59 1 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 1 56 130 0 2 0 0 110 35 1 0 24 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 89 117 0 0 0 0 112 58 1 0 22 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 128 82 0 2 0 0 78 101 1 0 17 0 46 1 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1 534 979 0 15 0 0 974 343 14 0 204 0 476 4 0 0 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 413 304 0 13 0 0 328 406 16 0 249 0 402 4 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM 1 325 471 0 5 0 0 423 236 5 0 90 0 210 2 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.857 1.6% PM 236 423 0 0 0.92
PM 0.967 0.7% AM 406 328 0 0 0.823
PHF 0.872 0.848
AM PM
0 0 0 0
90 249 0 0
0 0 0 0
210 402 0 0
PM AM
PHF
##### ##### PHF

0.854 0 413 304 0 AM

0.949 1 325 471 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
Fruitland Ave @ Winton Wy
Merced
Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Clear

37.3641
-120.6139

Page 1 of 3 ends

Northbound Westbound
Fruitland Ave
Winton Wy
Winton Wy
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Page 351 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
TOTAL 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
5:00 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 70 PM 0 0 0 19
PM Peak Total 0 28 AM 0 0 0 61 Peds <> 9 9
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0 Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Winton Wy
Fruitland Ave 0
Winton Wy Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
Fruitland Ave @ Winton Wy 37.3641
Merced -120.6139
Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Clear

Page 352 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME 104 Seconds CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Fruitland Ave @ Winton Wy
Merced
Tuesday, February 7, 2023
Winton Wy / Winton Wy
/ Fruitland Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS Northbound left turns are protected.

Page 3 of 3 ends
Page 353 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 4 40 19 1 0 27 41 2 6 0 4 4 5 0 0 18 8 10 3 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 3 68 17 2 0 45 80 1 6 0 12 25 9 0 0 23 14 40 1 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 9 95 26 2 0 60 80 1 4 0 14 33 14 0 0 36 27 44 2 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 20 104 21 4 0 41 88 1 3 0 9 19 16 0 0 29 25 45 2 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 36 101 31 3 1 75 111 4 5 0 8 30 18 0 0 22 23 73 1 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 35 91 29 4 0 66 106 16 1 0 17 57 45 0 0 20 48 62 2 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 5 55 19 3 0 50 60 2 6 0 9 25 11 0 0 37 8 34 3 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 2 46 27 4 0 23 55 1 2 0 3 8 5 1 0 22 4 26 3 TOTAL 0 114 600 189 23 1 387 621 28 33 0 76 201 123 1 0 207 157 334 17 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 9 105 41 3 1 70 122 4 4 0 7 8 4 0 0 54 21 33 2 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 5 115 54 2 1 63 106 3 3 0 6 13 7 0 0 50 17 46 2 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 4 110 50 0 0 60 99 6 2 0 7 5 3 0 0 44 14 55 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 10 122 48 2 1 55 99 5 0 0 7 13 7 0 0 39 22 38 2 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 5 127 59 1 1 66 93 2 3 0 7 11 4 0 0 53 18 50 1 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 7 110 36 1 1 50 93 1 1 0 10 15 5 0 0 36 25 66 1 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 9 112 49 0 0 52 86 4 1 0 9 11 5 0 0 37 18 58 1 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 11 141 33 1 0 56 73 10 2 0 13 9 12 0 0 41 11 60 2 TOTAL 0 60 942 370 10 5 472 771 35 16 0 66 85 47 0 0 354 146 406 11 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 100 391 107 13 1 242 385 22 13 0 48 139 93 0 0 107 123 224 7 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 0 24 474 211 5 3 244 397 16 8 0 27 42 21 0 0 186 71 189 5 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.837 1.7% PM 16 397 244 3 0.954
PM 0.960 0.9% AM 22 385 242 1 0.851
PHF 0.833 0.588
AM PM
0 0 224 189
27 48 123 71
42 139 107 186
21 93 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.873 0.921 PHF

0.89 0 100 391 107 AM

0.928 0 24 474 211 PM
Turning Movement Report
Bellevue Rd @ Winton Wy
Merced
Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Clear

37.3604
-120.6139

Page 1 of 3 ends

Bellevue Rd
Northbound Westbound
Bellevue Rd
Winton Wy
Winton Wy
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Page 354 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 13
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5
TOTAL 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 15
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 8
4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 8
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 22 PM 0 0 0 2
PM Peak Total 0 23 AM 0 0 0 6 Peds <> 8 8
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
5 8 Peds <>
3 0 0 0 AM
5 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Winton Wy
Bellevue Rd Bellevue Rd
Winton Wy Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
Bellevue Rd @ Winton Wy 37.3604
Merced -120.6139
Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Clear

Page 355 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME 120 Seconds CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Bellevue Rd @ Winton Wy
Merced
Tuesday, February 7, 2023
Winton Wy / Winton Wy
Bellevue Rd / Bellevue Rd
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS All approaches have protected left turns.

Page 3 of 3 ends
Page 356 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 50 0 4 0 0 3 117 4 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 58 0 7 0 0 8 129 4 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 122 0 5 0 0 15 129 6 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 87 0 3 0 0 4 116 4 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 91 0 9 0 0 7 93 1 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 73 0 3 0 0 7 82 3 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 60 0 5 0 0 10 97 3 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 0 4 0 0 9 71 1 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 617 0 40 0 0 63 834 26
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 161 0 5 0 0 12 82 1 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 166 0 2 0 0 8 70 1 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 137 0 4 0 0 13 88 1 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 169 0 2 0 0 3 79 2 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 135 0 1 0 0 15 95 4 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 161 0 2 0 0 9 65 4 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 150 0 1 0 0 4 64 1 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 128 0 0 0 0 20 56 2 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 1207 0 17 0 0 84 599 16
PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 358 0 24 0 0 34 467 15 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 633 0 13 0 0 36 319 5 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.797 4.4% PM 0 0 0 0 #####
PM 0.962 1.8% AM 0 0 0 0 #####
PHF 0.943 0.718
AM PM
0 0 467 319
12 24 34 36
633 358 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.87 0.879 PHF
##### 0 0 0 0 AM
##### 0 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
Atwater Blvd @ SR 99 NB Onramps
Merced
Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Clear

37.3511
-120.6234

Page 1 of 3 ends

Atwater Blvd
Northbound Westbound
Atwater Blvd
SR 99 Northbound On-ramp
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Page 357 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 0 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 0 0 AM 0 0 0 0 Peds <> 0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0 Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
SR 99 Northbound On-ramp
Atwater Blvd Atwater Blvd
0

Page 2 of 3 ends

Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
Atwater Blvd @ SR 99 NB Onramps 37.3511
Merced -120.6234
Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Clear

Page 358 of 498 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc.
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 516 W. Shaw Ave, Suite 103
www.metrotrafficdata.com Fresno, CA 93704

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

CYCLE TIME N/A CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Atwater Blvd @ SR 99 NB Onramps
Merced
Tuesday, February 7, 2023
SR 99 Northbound On-ramp /
Atwater Blvd / Atwater Blvd
Clear
N/A

COMMENTS

Page 3 of 3 ends
Page 359 of 498 ends

Attachment B: Growth Rate
Calculations

Page 360 of 498 ends

2020 AM Volume 2020 PM Volume 2020 Daily Volume 2045 AM Volume 2045 PM Volume 2045 Daily Volume AM Volume PM Volume Daily Volume 1 Westside Boulevard/SR 99 Southbound Ramps 310 720 2,430 730 1,000 4,380 5.4% 1.6% 3.2% 2 Westside Boulevard/SR 99 Northbound Ramps 510 460 3,550 1,460 580 4,830 7.5% 1.0% 1.4% 3 Westside Boulevard/Bellevue Road/Olive Avenue 500 460 3,540 470 520 3,900 -0.2% 0.5% 0.4% 4 Bellevue Road/Grove Avenue 100 330 1,710 120 360 1,810 0.8% 0.4% 0.2% 5 Bellevue Road/Vine Avenue 520 470 3,570 620 560 4,020 0.8% 0.8% 0.5% 6 Vine Avenue/Fruitland Avenue 20 10 10 140 20 20 24.0% 4.0% 4.0% 7 Fruitland Avenue/North Winton Way 940 990 6,690 1,160 1,240 9,140 0.9% 1.0% 1.5% 8 Bellevue Road/North Winton Way 1,330 1,560 11,120 1,770 2,060 15,700 1.3% 1.3% 1.6% 9 Atwater Boulevard/SR 99 Northbound Ramps 1,700 1,580 15,450 1,540 1,370 13,050 -0.4% -0.5% -0.6% Study Area Total 5,930 6,580 48,070 8,010 7,710 56,850 1.4% 0.7% 0.7% AM Peak Hour and PM Peak Hour Average Growth Rate 1.0%
RTP/SCS Model Growth Rate Calculations
ID Intersection RTP/SCS Model 2020 RTP/SCS Model 2045 Growth Rates

Page 361 of 498 ends

Attachment C: Select Link Analysis

Page 362 of 498 ends

2020 AM RTP/SCS Model Select Link Analysis
Figure 1
2020 PM RTP/SCS Model Select Link Analysis
Figure 2
2045 AM RTP/SCS Model Select Link Analysis
Figure 3
2045 PM RTP/SCS Model Select Link Analysis
Figure 4
WC22-3940_X_SelectLinkVols
Bellevue Road Link from Vine Avenue to Orchard Park Avenue 2020 AM RTP/SCS Model Select Link Analysis
Figure 1
WC22-3940_X_SelectLinkVols
Bellevue Road Link from Vine Avenue to Orchard Park Avenue

Page 363 of 498 ends

2020 AM RTP/SCS Model Select Link Analysis
Figure 1
2020 PM RTP/SCS Model Select Link Analysis
Figure 2
2045 AM RTP/SCS Model Select Link Analysis
Figure 3
2045 PM RTP/SCS Model Select Link Analysis
Figure 4
WC22-3940_X_SelectLinkVols
Bellevue Road Link from Vine Avenue to Orchard Park Avenue 2020 PM RTP/SCS Model Select Link Analysis
Figure 2
WC22-3940_X_SelectLinkVols
Bellevue Road Link from Vine Avenue to Orchard Park Avenue

Page 364 of 498 ends

2020 AM RTP/SCS Model Select Link Analysis
Figure 1
2020 PM RTP/SCS Model Select Link Analysis
Figure 2
2045 AM RTP/SCS Model Select Link Analysis
Figure 3
2045 PM RTP/SCS Model Select Link Analysis
Figure 4
WC22-3940_X_SelectLinkVols
Bellevue Road Link from Vine Avenue to Orchard Park Avenue 2045 AM RTP/SCS Model Select Link Analysis
Figure 3
WC22-3940_X_SelectLinkVols
Bellevue Road Link from Vine Avenue to Orchard Park Avenue

Page 365 of 498 ends

2020 AM RTP/SCS Model Select Link Analysis
Figure 1
2020 PM RTP/SCS Model Select Link Analysis
Figure 2
2045 AM RTP/SCS Model Select Link Analysis
Figure 3
2045 PM RTP/SCS Model Select Link Analysis
Figure 4
WC22-3940_X_SelectLinkVols
Bellevue Road Link from Vine Avenue to Orchard Park Avenue 2045 PM RTP/SCS Model Select Link Analysis
Figure 4
WC22-3940_X_SelectLinkVols
Bellevue Road Link from Vine Avenue to Orchard Park Avenue

Page 366 of 498 ends

Attachment D: LOS Calculation
Worksheets

Page 367 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
1: SR 99 Southbound Ramps & Westside Blvd Existing Conditions AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 90 48 54 89 0 0 0 0 56 4 3
Future Vol, veh/h 0 90 48 54 89 0 0 0 0 56 4 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - Stop
Storage Length - - - 320 - - - - - - - 620
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 0 98 52 59 97 0 0 0 0 61 4 3
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 150 0 0 339 365 97
Stage 1 - - - - - - 215 215 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 124 150 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.15 - - 6.45 6.55 6.25
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.45 5.55 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.45 5.55 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.245 - - 3.545 4.045 3.345
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1413 - 0 651 558 951
Stage 1 0 - - - - 0 814 719 -
Stage 2 0 - - - - 0 894 767 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1413 - - 624 0 951
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 624 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 814 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 856 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.9 11.3

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 1413 - 624 951
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.042 - 0.105 0.003
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 7.7 - 11.4 8.8
HCM Lane LOS - - A - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 - 0.3 0

Page 368 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
2: SR 99 Northbound Ramps & Westside Blvd Existing Conditions AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 39 107 0 0 96 141 47 0 31 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 39 107 0 0 96 141 47 0 31 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - Stop - - None
Storage Length 350 - - - - - - - 410 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 43 118 0 0 105 155 52 0 34 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 260 0 - - - 0 387 464 118
Stage 1 - - - - - - 204 204 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 183 260 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - - - - 6.43 6.53 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.43 5.53 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.43 5.53 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - - - - 3.527 4.027 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1299 - 0 0 - - 614 494 931
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - - 828 731 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - - 846 691 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1299 - - - - - 594 0 931
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 594 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 801 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 846 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 2.1 0 10.6

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 594 931 1299 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.087 0.037 0.033 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 11.6 9 7.9 - - -
HCM Lane LOS B A A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.1 0.1 - - -

Page 369 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
3: Olive Avenue & Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd Existing Conditions AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 83 30 1 157 4 58 26 0 5 13 22
Future Vol, veh/h 25 83 30 1 157 4 58 26 0 5 13 22
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 30 - - 30
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 27 89 32 1 169 4 62 28 0 5 14 24
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 173 0 0 121 0 0 351 334 105 346 348 171 Stage 1 - - - - - - 159 159 - 173 173 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 192 175 - 173 175 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - 4.13 - - 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - 2.227 - - 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1398 - - 1460 - - 602 585 947 606 574 870 Stage 1 - - - - - - 841 764 - 827 754 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 807 752 - 827 752 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1398 - - 1460 - - 565 572 947 574 561 870 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 565 572 - 574 561 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 823 748 - 810 753 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 770 751 - 779 736 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.4 0 12.5 10.3

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 567 - 1398 - - 1460 - - 565 870
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.159 - 0.019 - - 0.001 - - 0.034 0.027 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.5 0 7.6 0 - 7.5 0 - 11.6 9.3
HCM Lane LOS B A A A - A A - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 - 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.1 0.1

Page 370 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
4: Grove Ave & Bellevue Rd Existing Conditions AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 14 71 3 4 120 1 1 8 2 0 3 41
Future Vol, veh/h 14 71 3 4 120 1 1 8 2 0 3 41
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 20 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 16 83 3 5 140 1 1 9 2 0 3 48
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 141 0 0 86 0 0 293 268 85 273 269 141 Stage 1 - - - - - - 117 117 - 151 151 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 176 151 - 122 118 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - 4.13 - - 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - 2.227 - - 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1436 - - 1504 - - 657 636 971 677 636 904 Stage 1 - - - - - - 885 797 - 849 770 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 823 770 - 880 796 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1436 - - 1504 - - 612 626 971 659 626 904 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 612 626 - 659 626 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 874 787 - 839 767 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 773 767 - 857 786 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.2 0.2 10.5 9.4

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 624 971 1436 - - 1504 - - 877
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 0.002 0.011 - - 0.003 - - 0.058 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.9 8.7 7.5 0 - 7.4 0 - 9.4
HCM Lane LOS B A A A - A A - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.2

Page 371 of 498 ends

HCM 6th AWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
5: Vine Ave & Bellevue Rd Existing Conditions AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.5
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 66 10 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 104
Future Vol, veh/h 66 10 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 104
Peak Hour Factor 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 86 13 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 135
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 8 7.4 0 7.2

HCM LOS A A - A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 87% 0% 1%
Vol Thru, % 100% 13% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 0% 99%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 0 76 7 105
LT Vol 0 66 0 1
Through Vol 0 10 7 0
RT Vol 0 0 0 104
Lane Flow Rate 0 99 9 136
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0 0.12 0.011 0.135
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.262 4.388 4.285 3.562
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 0 816 829 994
Service Time 2.344 2.418 2.341 1.629
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0.121 0.011 0.137
HCM Control Delay 7.3 8 7.4 7.2
HCM Lane LOS N A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0 0.4 0 0.5

Page 372 of 498 ends

HCM 6th AWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
6: Vine Ave & Fruitland Ave Existing Conditions AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.4
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 21 0 64 66 48 0 13 47 65 16 4
Future Vol, veh/h 1 21 0 64 66 48 0 13 47 65 16 4
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 1 25 0 75 78 56 0 15 55 76 19 5
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 7.8 8.7 7.5 8.4

HCM LOS A A A A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 5% 36% 76%
Vol Thru, % 22% 95% 37% 19%
Vol Right, % 78% 0% 27% 5%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 60 22 178 85
LT Vol 0 1 64 65
Through Vol 13 21 66 16
RT Vol 47 0 48 4
Lane Flow Rate 71 26 209 100
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.081 0.033 0.249 0.13
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.133 4.58 4.284 4.685
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 868 783 840 767
Service Time 2.151 2.599 2.298 2.702
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.082 0.033 0.249 0.13
HCM Control Delay 7.5 7.8 8.7 8.4
HCM Lane LOS A A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.1 1 0.4

Page 373 of 498 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Bellevue Rd Realignment Project 7: N Winton Way & Fruitland Ave Existing Conditions AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 249 0 402 0 0 0 413 304 0 0 328 406 Future Volume (veh/h) 249 0 402 0 0 0 413 304 0 0 328 406 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 0 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 290 0 0 0 0 0 480 353 0 0 381 87
Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 3 3
Cap, veh/h 0 0 0 5 0 881 3084 0 0 885 388
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 0 1856 0 1767 3618 0 0 3618 1544
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0.0 0 0 0 480 353 0 0 381 87
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1856 0 1767 1763 0 0 1763 1544 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.5 0.6 0.0 0.0 3.6 1.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.5 0.6 0.0 0.0 3.6 1.8 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 5 0 881 3084 0 0 885 388
V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.22 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1905 0 2434 3620 0 0 3620 1586
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.9 0.3 0.0 0.0 12.6 11.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 12.9 12.2 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 0 833 468
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 4.4 12.7
Approach LOS A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 39.9 24.9 15.0 0.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 41.0 55.0 41.0 41.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.6 9.5 5.6 0.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.3 1.5 2.8 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.4
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

Page 374 of 498 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Bellevue Rd Realignment Project 8: N Winton Way & Bellevue Rd Existing Conditions AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 48 139 93 107 123 224 100 391 107 243 385 22 Future Volume (veh/h) 48 139 93 107 123 224 100 391 107 243 385 22 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 57 165 38 127 146 80 119 465 67 289 458 22 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 76 394 88 168 426 220 157 853 378 364 1229 59 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.14 0.14 0.09 0.19 0.19 0.09 0.24 0.24 0.21 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 2857 641 1767 2238 1158 1767 3526 1563 1767 3423 164 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 57 100 103 127 113 113 119 465 67 289 235 245 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1763 1735 1767 1763 1634 1767 1763 1563 1767 1763 1825 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.7 2.8 2.9 3.7 3.0 3.2 3.5 6.1 1.8 8.3 5.3 5.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 2.8 2.9 3.7 3.0 3.2 3.5 6.1 1.8 8.3 5.3 5.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.37 1.00 0.71 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 76 243 239 168 335 311 157 853 378 364 633 655 V/C Ratio(X) 0.75 0.41 0.43 0.76 0.34 0.36 0.76 0.54 0.18 0.79 0.37 0.37 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 630 1820 1792 630 1820 1687 630 3641 1614 1460 1820 1884 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.2 21.0 21.0 23.5 18.7 18.8 23.7 17.6 16.0 20.1 12.6 12.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 14.0 1.1 1.2 6.8 0.6 0.7 7.2 0.5 0.2 4.0 0.4 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.9 1.1 1.1 1.7 1.1 1.1 1.6 2.2 0.6 3.3 1.7 1.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 39.2 22.1 22.3 30.3 19.3 19.5 30.9 18.2 16.2 24.0 13.0 13.0 LnGrp LOS D C C C B B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 260 353 651 769
Approach Delay, s/veh 25.9 23.3 20.3 17.1
Approach LOS C C C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s9.1 11.8 8.7 23.6 6.3 14.6 15.0 17.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s19.0 55.0 19.0 55.0 19.0 55.0 44.0 55.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s5.7 4.9 5.5 7.3 3.7 5.2 10.3 8.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 1.1 0.2 2.9 0.1 1.4 0.8 3.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.3
HCM 6th LOS C

Page 375 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
9: Atwater Blvd & SR 99 On-Ramps Existing Conditions AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 358 34 467 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 24 358 34 467 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - Free - None
Storage Length 150 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 30 448 43 584 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 43 0 - 0 551 43
Stage 1 - - - - 43 -
Stage 2 - - - - 508 -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - - 6.44 6.24
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.44 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.44 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.236 - - - 3.536 3.336
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1553 - - 0 492 1022
Stage 1 - - - 0 974 -
Stage 2 - - - 0 600 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1553 - - - 483 1022
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 483 -
Stage 1 - - - - 955 -
Stage 2 - - - - 600 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 1553 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.019 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 - - 0
HCM Lane LOS A - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - -

Page 376 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
1: SR 99 Southbound Ramps & Westside Blvd Existing Conditions PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 92 73 42 65 0 0 0 0 130 2 13
Future Vol, veh/h 0 92 73 42 65 0 0 0 0 130 2 13
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - Stop
Storage Length - - - 320 - - - - - - - 620
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 98 78 45 69 0 0 0 0 138 2 14
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 176 0 0 296 335 69
Stage 1 - - - - - - 159 159 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 137 176 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.13 - - 6.43 6.53 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.43 5.53 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.43 5.53 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.227 - - 3.527 4.027 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1394 - 0 693 584 991
Stage 1 0 - - - - 0 867 764 -
Stage 2 0 - - - - 0 887 752 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1394 - - 671 0 991
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 671 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 867 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 859 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 3 11.5

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 1394 - 671 991
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.032 - 0.209 0.014
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 7.7 - 11.8 8.7
HCM Lane LOS - - A - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 - 0.8 0

Page 377 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
2: SR 99 Northbound Ramps & Westside Blvd Existing Conditions PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 206 0 0 84 62 23 3 47 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 16 206 0 0 84 62 23 3 47 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - Stop - - None
Storage Length 350 - - - - - - - 410 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 17 222 0 0 90 67 25 3 51 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 157 0 - - - 0 380 413 222
Stage 1 - - - - - - 256 256 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 124 157 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - - - - 6.43 6.53 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.43 5.53 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.43 5.53 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - - - - 3.527 4.027 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1417 - 0 0 - - 620 528 815
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - - 784 694 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - - 899 766 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1417 - - - - - 613 0 815
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 613 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 775 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 899 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 0 10.2

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 613 815 1417 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.046 0.062 0.012 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 11.2 9.7 7.6 - - -
HCM Lane LOS B A A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.2 0 - - -

Page 378 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
3: Olive Avenue & Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd Existing Conditions PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 29 165 59 0 77 1 41 17 1 6 27 28
Future Vol, veh/h 29 165 59 0 77 1 41 17 1 6 27 28
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 30 - - 30
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 30 172 61 0 80 1 43 18 1 6 28 29
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 81 0 0 233 0 0 372 344 203 353 374 81 Stage 1 - - - - - - 263 263 - 81 81 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 109 81 - 272 293 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - 4.13 - - 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - 2.227 - - 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1510 - - 1329 - - 583 577 835 600 555 976 Stage 1 - - - - - - 740 689 - 925 826 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 894 826 - 732 668 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1510 - - 1329 - - 533 564 835 575 542 976 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 533 564 - 575 542 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 723 673 - 904 826 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 838 826 - 695 653 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.9 0 12.4 10.5

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 542 835 1510 - - 1329 - - 548 976
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.111 0.001 0.02 - - - - - 0.063 0.03 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.5 9.3 7.4 0 - 0 - - 12 8.8
HCM Lane LOS B A A A - A - - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.2 0.1

Page 379 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
4: Grove Ave & Bellevue Rd Existing Conditions PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 49 123 0 4 55 0 0 7 1 0 1 23
Future Vol, veh/h 49 123 0 4 55 0 0 7 1 0 1 23
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 20 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 54 135 0 4 60 0 0 8 1 0 1 25
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 60 0 0 135 0 0 324 311 135 316 311 60 Stage 1 - - - - - - 243 243 - 68 68 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 81 68 - 248 243 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - 4.13 - - 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - 2.227 - - 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1537 - - 1443 - - 627 602 911 635 602 1003 Stage 1 - - - - - - 758 703 - 940 836 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 925 836 - 754 703 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1537 - - 1443 - - 591 577 911 608 577 1003 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 591 577 - 608 577 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 729 676 - 904 833 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 898 833 - 716 676 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 2.1 0.5 11 8.8

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 577 911 1537 - - 1443 - - 973
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 0.001 0.035 - - 0.003 - - 0.027 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.3 9 7.4 0 - 7.5 0 - 8.8
HCM Lane LOS B A A A - A A - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.1

Page 380 of 498 ends

HCM 6th AWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
5: Vine Ave & Bellevue Rd Existing Conditions PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.7
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 112 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 60
Future Vol, veh/h 112 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 60
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 132 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 71
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 8.1 7.2 0 6.9

HCM LOS A A - A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 99% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 100% 1% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 0 113 3 60
LT Vol 0 112 0 0
Through Vol 0 1 3 0
RT Vol 0 0 0 60
Lane Flow Rate 0 133 4 71
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0 0.158 0.004 0.07
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.244 4.276 4.177 3.586
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 0 842 852 983
Service Time 2.332 2.291 2.225 1.666
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0.158 0.005 0.072
HCM Control Delay 7.3 8.1 7.2 6.9
HCM Lane LOS N A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0 0.6 0 0.2

Page 381 of 498 ends

HCM 6th AWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
6: Vine Ave & Fruitland Ave Existing Conditions PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.9
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 51 1 31 40 8 1 25 89 24 20 2
Future Vol, veh/h 5 51 1 31 40 8 1 25 89 24 20 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 6 65 1 39 51 10 1 32 113 30 25 3
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 8 8.1 7.7 8

HCM LOS A A A A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 1% 9% 39% 52%
Vol Thru, % 22% 89% 51% 43%
Vol Right, % 77% 2% 10% 4%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 115 57 79 46
LT Vol 1 5 31 24
Through Vol 25 51 40 20
RT Vol 89 1 8 2
Lane Flow Rate 146 72 100 58
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.16 0.09 0.125 0.074
Departure Headway (Hd) 3.958 4.51 4.489 4.579
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 908 797 801 784
Service Time 1.97 2.527 2.505 2.594
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.161 0.09 0.125 0.074
HCM Control Delay 7.7 8 8.1 8
HCM Lane LOS A A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.2

Page 382 of 498 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Bellevue Rd Realignment Project 7: N Winton Way & Fruitland Ave Existing Conditions PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 90 0 210 0 0 0 326 471 0 0 423 236 Future Volume (veh/h) 90 0 210 0 0 0 326 471 0 0 423 236 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 0 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 93 0 0 0 0 0 336 486 0 0 436 56
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 3 3
Cap, veh/h 0 0 0 5 0 855 3089 0 0 947 415
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 0 1856 0 1767 3618 0 0 3618 1546
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0.0 0 0 0 336 486 0 0 436 56
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1856 0 1767 1763 0 0 1763 1546 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.9 0.8 0.0 0.0 4.2 1.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.9 0.8 0.0 0.0 4.2 1.1 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 5 0 855 3089 0 0 947 415
V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.13 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1884 0 2407 3579 0 0 3579 1570
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 12.3 11.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.9 0.4 0.0 0.0 12.7 11.4 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 0 822 492
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 3.1 12.5
Approach LOS A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 40.4 24.5 15.8 0.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 41.0 55.0 41.0 41.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.8 6.9 6.2 0.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.3 1.0 3.1 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.6
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

Page 383 of 498 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Bellevue Rd Realignment Project 8: N Winton Way & Bellevue Rd Existing Conditions PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 27 42 21 186 71 189 24 474 211 247 397 16 Future Volume (veh/h) 27 42 21 186 71 189 24 474 211 247 397 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 28 44 2 194 74 54 25 494 137 257 414 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 45 318 14 251 424 282 41 918 406 328 1467 53 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.09 0.09 0.14 0.21 0.21 0.02 0.26 0.26 0.19 0.42 0.42 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 3433 155 1767 2024 1348 1767 3526 1558 1767 3469 125 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 28 22 24 194 64 64 25 494 137 257 210 219 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1763 1825 1767 1763 1608 1767 1763 1558 1767 1763 1832 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 0.6 0.6 5.6 1.6 1.8 0.7 6.4 3.8 7.4 4.2 4.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 0.6 0.6 5.6 1.6 1.8 0.7 6.4 3.8 7.4 4.2 4.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 45 163 169 251 369 337 41 918 406 328 746 775 V/C Ratio(X) 0.62 0.14 0.14 0.77 0.17 0.19 0.61 0.54 0.34 0.78 0.28 0.28 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 630 1819 1883 630 1819 1660 630 3639 1608 1459 1819 1891 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.7 22.2 22.2 22.0 17.3 17.4 25.8 16.9 16.0 20.7 10.1 10.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 13.2 0.4 0.4 5.0 0.2 0.3 13.7 0.5 0.5 4.1 0.2 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.5 0.2 0.3 2.4 0.6 0.6 0.4 2.3 1.2 3.0 1.3 1.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 38.9 22.6 22.6 27.1 17.5 17.6 39.5 17.4 16.5 24.8 10.3 10.3 LnGrp LOS D C C C B B D B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 74 322 656 686
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.8 23.3 18.1 15.7
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s11.6 9.4 5.2 27.0 5.4 15.7 13.9 18.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s19.0 55.0 19.0 55.0 19.0 55.0 44.0 55.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s7.6 2.6 2.7 6.2 2.8 3.8 9.4 8.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.2 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.8 0.7 3.9 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.6
HCM 6th LOS B

Page 384 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
9: Atwater Blvd & SR 99 On-Ramps Existing Conditions PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 12 633 36 319 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 12 633 36 319 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - Free - None
Storage Length 150 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 13 659 38 332 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 38 0 - 0 723 38
Stage 1 - - - - 38 -
Stage 2 - - - - 685 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1566 - - 0 392 1031
Stage 1 - - - 0 982 -
Stage 2 - - - 0 499 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1566 - - - 389 1031
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 389 -
Stage 1 - - - - 974 -
Stage 2 - - - - 499 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 1566 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 - - 0
HCM Lane LOS A - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - -

Page 385 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
1: SR 99 Southbound Ramps & Westside Blvd Design Year No Project Conditions AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 130 70 70 130 0 0 0 0 80 10 10
Future Vol, veh/h 0 130 70 70 130 0 0 0 0 80 10 10
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - Stop
Storage Length - - - 320 - - - - - - - 620
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 0 148 80 80 148 0 0 0 0 91 11 11
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 228 0 0 496 536 148
Stage 1 - - - - - - 308 308 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 188 228 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.15 - - 6.45 6.55 6.25
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.45 5.55 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.45 5.55 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.245 - - 3.545 4.045 3.345
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1323 - 0 528 447 891
Stage 1 0 - - - - 0 739 655 -
Stage 2 0 - - - - 0 837 710 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1323 - - 496 0 891
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 496 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 739 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 787 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.8 13.6

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 1323 - 496 891
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.06 - 0.206 0.013
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 7.9 - 14.1 9.1
HCM Lane LOS - - A - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.2 - 0.8 0

Page 386 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
2: SR 99 Northbound Ramps & Westside Blvd Design Year No Project Conditions AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 50 160 0 0 140 180 60 0 40 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 50 160 0 0 140 180 60 0 40 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - Stop - - None
Storage Length 350 - - - - - - - 410 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 57 182 0 0 159 205 68 0 45 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 364 0 - - - 0 558 660 182
Stage 1 - - - - - - 296 296 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 262 364 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - - - - 6.43 6.53 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.43 5.53 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.43 5.53 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - - - - 3.527 4.027 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1189 - 0 0 - - 489 382 858
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - - 752 666 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - - 780 622 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1189 - - - - - 466 0 858
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 466 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 716 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 780 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.9 0 12.2

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 466 858 1189 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.146 0.053 0.048 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 14 9.4 8.2 - - -
HCM Lane LOS B A A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0.2 0.1 - - -

Page 387 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
3: Olive Avenue & Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd Design Year No Project Conditions AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 40 120 40 10 210 10 80 40 0 10 20 30 Future Vol, veh/h 40 120 40 10 210 10 80 40 0 10 20 30
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 30 - - 30
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 45 136 45 11 239 11 91 45 0 11 23 34
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 250 0 0 181 0 0 544 521 159 538 538 245 Stage 1 - - - - - - 249 249 - 267 267 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 295 272 - 271 271 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - 4.13 - - 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - 2.227 - - 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1310 - - 1388 - - 448 458 884 452 448 791 Stage 1 - - - - - - 753 699 - 736 686 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 711 683 - 733 683 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1310 - - 1388 - - 397 436 884 401 427 791 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 397 436 - 401 427 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 724 672 - 708 680 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 652 677 - 657 657 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.6 0.3 18.1 12.1

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 409 - 1310 - - 1388 - - 418 791
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.333 - 0.035 - - 0.008 - - 0.082 0.043 HCM Control Delay (s) 18.1 0 7.8 0 - 7.6 0 - 14.4 9.8
HCM Lane LOS C A A A - A A - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.4 - 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.3 0.1

Page 388 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
4: Grove Ave & Bellevue Rd Design Year No Project Conditions AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 100 10 10 160 10 10 20 10 0 10 60 Future Vol, veh/h 20 100 10 10 160 10 10 20 10 0 10 60
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 20 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 23 114 11 11 182 11 11 23 11 0 11 68
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 193 0 0 125 0 0 415 381 120 393 381 188 Stage 1 - - - - - - 166 166 - 210 210 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 249 215 - 183 171 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - 4.13 - - 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - 2.227 - - 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1374 - - 1455 - - 546 550 929 565 550 851 Stage 1 - - - - - - 834 759 - 790 727 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 753 723 - 816 755 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1374 - - 1455 - - 484 536 929 529 536 851 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 484 536 - 529 536 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 819 745 - 776 721 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 676 717 - 767 741 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.2 0.4 11.6 10.1

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 517 929 1374 - - 1455 - - 785
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.066 0.012 0.017 - - 0.008 - - 0.101 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.5 8.9 7.7 0 - 7.5 0 - 10.1
HCM Lane LOS B A A A - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.3

Page 389 of 498 ends

HCM 6th AWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
5: Vine Ave & Bellevue Rd Design Year No Project Conditions AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.8
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 90 20 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 10 0 140
Future Vol, veh/h 90 20 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 10 0 140
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 102 23 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 159
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 8.3 7.5 0 7.5

HCM LOS A A - A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 82% 0% 7%
Vol Thru, % 100% 18% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 0% 93%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 0 110 10 150
LT Vol 0 90 0 10
Through Vol 0 20 10 0
RT Vol 0 0 0 140
Lane Flow Rate 0 125 11 170
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0 0.154 0.014 0.173
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.453 4.441 4.368 3.656
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 0 804 809 963
Service Time 2.453 2.486 2.449 1.747
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0.155 0.014 0.177
HCM Control Delay 7.5 8.3 7.5 7.5
HCM Lane LOS N A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0 0.5 0 0.6

Page 390 of 498 ends

HCM 6th AWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
6: Vine Ave & Fruitland Ave Design Year No Project Conditions AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.4
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 30 0 90 90 70 0 20 60 90 30 10
Future Vol, veh/h 10 30 0 90 90 70 0 20 60 90 30 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 11 34 0 102 102 80 0 23 68 102 34 11
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 8.3 10 8.1 9.2

HCM LOS A A A A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 25% 36% 69%
Vol Thru, % 25% 75% 36% 23%
Vol Right, % 75% 0% 28% 8%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 80 40 250 130
LT Vol 0 10 90 90
Through Vol 20 30 90 30
RT Vol 60 0 70 10
Lane Flow Rate 91 45 284 148
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.113 0.062 0.354 0.202
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.461 4.905 4.483 4.919
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 800 727 801 728
Service Time 2.507 2.955 2.518 2.962
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.114 0.062 0.355 0.203
HCM Control Delay 8.1 8.3 10 9.2
HCM Lane LOS A A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.4 0.2 1.6 0.8

Page 391 of 498 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Bellevue Rd Realignment Project 7: N Winton Way & Fruitland Ave Design Year No Project Conditions AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 320 0 520 0 0 0 530 390 0 0 420 520 Future Volume (veh/h) 320 0 520 0 0 0 530 390 0 0 420 520 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 0 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 348 0 0 0 0 0 576 424 0 0 457 103
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 3 3
Cap, veh/h 0 0 0 4 0 852 3100 0 0 976 428
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.28 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 0 1856 0 1767 3618 0 0 3618 1547
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0.0 0 0 0 576 424 0 0 457 103
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1856 0 1767 1763 0 0 1763 1547 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.4 0.7 0.0 0.0 4.5 2.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.4 0.7 0.0 0.0 4.5 2.1 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 4 0 852 3100 0 0 976 428
V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.24 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1836 0 2345 3487 0 0 3487 1530
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 12.5 11.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 12.8 11.9 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 0 1000 560
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 5.5 12.6
Approach LOS A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 41.4 25.0 16.5 0.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 41.0 55.0 41.0 41.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 12.4 6.5 0.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.8 1.9 3.4 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.0
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

Page 392 of 498 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Bellevue Rd Realignment Project 8: N Winton Way & Bellevue Rd Design Year No Project Conditions AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 70 180 120 140 160 290 130 500 140 310 490 30 Future Volume (veh/h) 70 180 120 140 160 290 130 500 140 310 490 30 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 76 196 60 152 174 127 141 543 93 337 533 30 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 99 390 116 197 400 275 183 884 392 403 1272 71 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.15 0.15 0.11 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.25 0.25 0.23 0.38 0.38 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 2674 795 1767 1991 1367 1767 3526 1563 1767 3392 191 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 76 127 129 152 153 148 141 543 93 337 277 286 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1763 1707 1767 1763 1595 1767 1763 1563 1767 1763 1820 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 4.3 4.5 5.4 4.9 5.3 5.0 8.8 3.1 11.7 7.5 7.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.7 4.3 4.5 5.4 4.9 5.3 5.0 8.8 3.1 11.7 7.5 7.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.47 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 99 257 249 197 355 321 183 884 392 403 661 683 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.49 0.52 0.77 0.43 0.46 0.77 0.61 0.24 0.84 0.42 0.42 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 522 1506 1458 522 1506 1363 522 3012 1336 1208 1506 1555 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.0 25.3 25.4 27.8 22.5 22.6 28.1 21.4 19.2 23.7 14.9 14.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 11.7 1.5 1.7 6.4 0.8 1.0 6.7 0.7 0.3 4.6 0.4 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.4 1.7 1.8 2.5 2.0 1.9 2.3 3.3 1.0 4.9 2.6 2.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 41.7 26.8 27.1 34.2 23.3 23.7 34.8 22.0 19.5 28.4 15.3 15.3 LnGrp LOS D C C C C C C C B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 332 453 777 900
Approach Delay, s/veh 30.3 27.1 24.1 20.2
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s11.2 13.9 10.7 28.6 7.6 17.4 18.7 20.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s19.0 55.0 19.0 55.0 19.0 55.0 44.0 55.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s7.4 6.5 7.0 9.5 4.7 7.3 13.7 10.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 1.5 0.3 3.5 0.1 1.9 1.0 4.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.0
HCM 6th LOS C

Page 393 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
9: Atwater Blvd & SR 99 On-Ramps Design Year No Project Conditions AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 40 460 50 600 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 40 460 50 600 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - Free - None
Storage Length 150 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 43 500 54 652 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 54 0 - 0 640 54
Stage 1 - - - - 54 -
Stage 2 - - - - 586 -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - - 6.44 6.24
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.44 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.44 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.236 - - - 3.536 3.336
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1539 - - 0 436 1008
Stage 1 - - - 0 963 -
Stage 2 - - - 0 552 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1539 - - - 424 1008
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 424 -
Stage 1 - - - - 936 -
Stage 2 - - - - 552 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 1539 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.028 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 - - 0
HCM Lane LOS A - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - -

Page 394 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
1: SR 99 Southbound Ramps & Westside Blvd Design Year No Project Conditions PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 130 100 60 90 0 0 0 0 170 10 20
Future Vol, veh/h 0 130 100 60 90 0 0 0 0 170 10 20
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - Stop
Storage Length - - - 320 - - - - - - - 620
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 148 114 68 102 0 0 0 0 193 11 23
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 262 0 0 443 500 102
Stage 1 - - - - - - 238 238 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 205 262 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.13 - - 6.43 6.53 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.43 5.53 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.43 5.53 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.227 - - 3.527 4.027 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1296 - 0 570 471 950
Stage 1 0 - - - - 0 799 706 -
Stage 2 0 - - - - 0 827 690 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1296 - - 540 0 950
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 540 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 799 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 784 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 3.2 15

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 1296 - 540 950
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.053 - 0.379 0.024
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 7.9 - 15.7 8.9
HCM Lane LOS - - A - C A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.2 - 1.8 0.1

Page 395 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
2: SR 99 Northbound Ramps & Westside Blvd Design Year No Project Conditions PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 30 270 0 0 120 80 30 10 60 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 30 270 0 0 120 80 30 10 60 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - Stop - - None
Storage Length 350 - - - - - - - 410 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 34 307 0 0 136 91 34 11 68 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 227 0 - - - 0 557 602 307
Stage 1 - - - - - - 375 375 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 182 227 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - - - - 6.43 6.53 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.43 5.53 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.43 5.53 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - - - - 3.527 4.027 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1335 - 0 0 - - 490 412 731
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - - 693 615 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - - 847 714 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1335 - - - - - 478 0 731
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 478 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 676 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 847 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.8 0 11.6

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 478 731 1335 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.095 0.093 0.026 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 13.3 10.4 7.8 - - -
HCM Lane LOS B B A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.3 0.1 - - -

Page 396 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
3: Olive Avenue & Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd Design Year No Project Conditions PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 40 210 80 0 100 10 60 30 10 10 40 40 Future Vol, veh/h 40 210 80 0 100 10 60 30 10 10 40 40
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 30 - - 30
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 45 239 91 0 114 11 68 34 11 11 45 45
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 125 0 0 330 0 0 540 500 285 517 540 120 Stage 1 - - - - - - 375 375 - 120 120 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 165 125 - 397 420 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - 4.13 - - 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - 2.227 - - 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1455 - - 1224 - - 451 471 752 467 447 929 Stage 1 - - - - - - 644 615 - 882 794 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 835 791 - 627 588 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1455 - - 1224 - - 383 453 752 421 430 929 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 383 453 - 421 430 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 620 592 - 848 794 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 749 791 - 560 566 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.9 0 16.2 12.2

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 404 752 1455 - - 1224 - - 428 929
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.253 0.015 0.031 - - - - - 0.133 0.049 HCM Control Delay (s) 16.9 9.9 7.6 0 - 0 - - 14.7 9.1
HCM Lane LOS C A A A - A - - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 0 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.5 0.2

Page 397 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
4: Grove Ave & Bellevue Rd Design Year No Project Conditions PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 70 160 0 10 80 0 0 10 10 0 10 30
Future Vol, veh/h 70 160 0 10 80 0 0 10 10 0 10 30
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 20 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 80 182 0 11 91 0 0 11 11 0 11 34
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 91 0 0 182 0 0 478 455 182 466 455 91 Stage 1 - - - - - - 342 342 - 113 113 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 136 113 - 353 342 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - 4.13 - - 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - 2.227 - - 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1498 - - 1387 - - 496 500 858 505 500 964 Stage 1 - - - - - - 671 636 - 890 800 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 865 800 - 662 636 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1498 - - 1387 - - 446 467 858 464 467 964 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 446 467 - 464 467 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 631 598 - 837 794 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 816 794 - 603 598 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 2.3 0.8 11.1 10

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 467 858 1498 - - 1387 - - 761
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 0.013 0.053 - - 0.008 - - 0.06 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.9 9.3 7.5 0 - 7.6 0 - 10
HCM Lane LOS B A A A - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 0.2 - - 0 - - 0.2

Page 398 of 498 ends

HCM 6th AWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
5: Vine Ave & Bellevue Rd Design Year No Project Conditions PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 150 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 80
Future Vol, veh/h 150 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 80
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 170 11 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 91
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 8.5 7.4 0 7.2

HCM LOS A A - A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 94% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 100% 6% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 0 160 10 80
LT Vol 0 150 0 0
Through Vol 0 10 10 0
RT Vol 0 0 0 80
Lane Flow Rate 0 182 11 91
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0 0.218 0.013 0.096
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.489 4.307 4.251 3.798
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 0 833 831 949
Service Time 2.492 2.34 2.331 1.798
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 0.218 0.013 0.096
HCM Control Delay 7.5 8.5 7.4 7.2
HCM Lane LOS N A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0 0.8 0 0.3

Page 399 of 498 ends

HCM 6th AWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
6: Vine Ave & Fruitland Ave Design Year No Project Conditions PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.5
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 70 10 40 60 20 10 40 120 40 30 10 Future Vol, veh/h 10 70 10 40 60 20 10 40 120 40 30 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 11 80 11 45 68 23 11 45 136 45 34 11
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 8.5 8.7 8.5 8.4

HCM LOS A A A A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 6% 11% 33% 50%
Vol Thru, % 24% 78% 50% 38%
Vol Right, % 71% 11% 17% 12%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 170 90 120 80
LT Vol 10 10 40 40
Through Vol 40 70 60 30
RT Vol 120 10 20 10
Lane Flow Rate 193 102 136 91
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.226 0.134 0.177 0.12
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.219 4.708 4.677 4.758
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 850 760 766 753
Service Time 2.249 2.745 2.713 2.794
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.227 0.134 0.178 0.121
HCM Control Delay 8.5 8.5 8.7 8.4
HCM Lane LOS A A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.9 0.5 0.6 0.4

Page 400 of 498 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Bellevue Rd Realignment Project 7: N Winton Way & Fruitland Ave Design Year No Project Conditions PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 120 0 270 0 0 0 420 600 0 0 540 300 Future Volume (veh/h) 120 0 270 0 0 0 420 600 0 0 540 300 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 0 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 130 0 0 0 0 0 457 652 0 0 587 88
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 3 3
Cap, veh/h 0 0 0 4 0 803 3123 0 0 1119 492
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.89 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 0 1856 0 1767 3618 0 0 3618 1550
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0.0 0 0 0 457 652 0 0 587 88
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1856 0 1767 1763 0 0 1763 1550 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 1.1 0.0 0.0 6.0 1.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 1.1 0.0 0.0 6.0 1.8 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 4 0 803 3123 0 0 1119 492
V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.18 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1736 0 2218 3298 0 0 3298 1450
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.8 0.3 0.0 0.0 12.3 10.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 12.6 11.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 0 1109 675
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 4.1 12.4
Approach LOS A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 43.8 24.9 18.9 0.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 41.0 55.0 41.0 41.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 10.3 8.0 0.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.7 1.5 4.4 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.3
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

Page 401 of 498 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Bellevue Rd Realignment Project 8: N Winton Way & Bellevue Rd Design Year No Project Conditions PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 40 60 30 240 100 250 40 610 270 320 510 30 Future Volume (veh/h) 40 60 30 240 100 250 40 610 270 320 510 30 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 43 65 3 261 109 60 43 663 213 348 554 31 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 56 260 12 310 492 254 56 1003 444 407 1638 92 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.08 0.08 0.18 0.22 0.22 0.03 0.28 0.28 0.23 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 3429 157 1767 2246 1160 1767 3526 1559 1767 3393 190 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 43 33 35 261 84 85 43 663 213 348 287 298 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1763 1824 1767 1763 1643 1767 1763 1559 1767 1763 1820 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.8 1.3 1.3 10.4 2.8 3.1 1.8 12.0 8.2 13.7 7.3 7.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.8 1.3 1.3 10.4 2.8 3.1 1.8 12.0 8.2 13.7 7.3 7.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.71 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 56 134 138 310 386 360 56 1003 444 407 851 879 V/C Ratio(X) 0.76 0.25 0.25 0.84 0.22 0.24 0.76 0.66 0.48 0.86 0.34 0.34 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 462 1335 1381 462 1335 1244 462 2670 1181 1071 1335 1378 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 34.9 31.6 31.6 29.0 23.2 23.3 34.9 22.9 21.5 26.8 11.6 11.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 18.7 1.0 0.9 8.8 0.3 0.3 18.7 0.8 0.8 5.2 0.2 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.0 0.6 0.6 4.9 1.1 1.2 1.0 4.6 2.8 5.9 2.5 2.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 53.6 32.6 32.6 37.8 23.5 23.7 53.6 23.7 22.3 32.0 11.8 11.8 LnGrp LOS D C C D C C D C C C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 111 430 919 933
Approach Delay, s/veh 40.7 32.2 24.7 19.4
Approach LOS D C C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s16.7 10.0 6.3 39.6 6.3 20.4 20.7 25.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s19.0 55.0 19.0 55.0 19.0 55.0 44.0 55.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s12.4 3.3 3.8 9.3 3.8 5.1 15.7 14.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.3 0.1 3.6 0.1 1.0 1.0 5.7 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.7
HCM 6th LOS C

Page 402 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
9: Atwater Blvd & SR 99 On-Ramps Design Year No Project Conditions PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 810 50 410 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 20 810 50 410 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - Free - None
Storage Length 150 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 22 880 54 446 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 54 0 - 0 978 54
Stage 1 - - - - 54 -
Stage 2 - - - - 924 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1545 - - 0 277 1010
Stage 1 - - - 0 966 -
Stage 2 - - - 0 385 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1545 - - - 273 1010
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 273 -
Stage 1 - - - - 952 -
Stage 2 - - - - 385 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 1545 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 - - 0
HCM Lane LOS A - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - -

Page 403 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
1: SR 99 Southbound Ramps & Westside Blvd Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 1) Conditions AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 140 60 70 130 0 0 0 0 150 10 10
Future Vol, veh/h 0 140 60 70 130 0 0 0 0 150 10 10
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - Stop
Storage Length - - - 320 - - - - - - - 620
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 0 159 68 80 148 0 0 0 0 170 11 11
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 227 0 0 501 535 148
Stage 1 - - - - - - 308 308 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 193 227 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.15 - - 6.45 6.55 6.25
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.45 5.55 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.45 5.55 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.245 - - 3.545 4.045 3.345
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1324 - 0 524 447 891
Stage 1 0 - - - - 0 739 655 -
Stage 2 0 - - - - 0 833 711 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1324 - - 493 0 891
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 493 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 739 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 783 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.8 16.1

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 1324 - 493 891
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.06 - 0.369 0.013
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 7.9 - 16.5 9.1
HCM Lane LOS - - A - C A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.2 - 1.7 0

Page 404 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
2: SR 99 Northbound Ramps & Westside Blvd Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 1) Conditions AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 50 240 0 0 180 540 20 0 40 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 50 240 0 0 180 540 20 0 40 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - Stop - - None
Storage Length 350 - - - - - - - 410 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 57 273 0 0 205 614 23 0 45 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 819 0 - - - 0 899 1206 273
Stage 1 - - - - - - 387 387 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 512 819 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - - - - 6.43 6.53 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.43 5.53 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.43 5.53 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - - - - 3.527 4.027 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 805 - 0 0 - - 308 183 763
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - - 684 608 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - - 600 388 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 805 - - - - - 286 0 763
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 286 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 635 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 600 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.7 0 12.9

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 286 763 805 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.079 0.06 0.071 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 18.7 10 9.8 - - -
HCM Lane LOS C B A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.2 0.2 - - -

Page 405 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
3: Olive Avenue & Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 1) Conditions AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 10.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 40 200 40 10 610 10 80 40 0 10 20 30 Future Vol, veh/h 40 200 40 10 610 10 80 40 0 10 20 30
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 30 - - 30
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 45 227 45 11 693 11 91 45 0 11 23 34
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 704 0 0 272 0 0 1089 1066 250 1083 1083 699 Stage 1 - - - - - - 340 340 - 721 721 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 749 726 - 362 362 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - 4.13 - - 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - 2.227 - - 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 889 - - 1286 - - 192 221 786 194 216 438 Stage 1 - - - - - - 673 637 - 417 430 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 402 428 - 655 623 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 889 - - 1286 - - 153 205 786 152 200 438 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 153 205 - 152 200 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 633 599 - 392 424 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 346 422 - 569 586 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 1.3 0.1 83.4 21.7

HCM LOS F C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 167 - 889 - - 1286 - - 181 438
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.817 - 0.051 - - 0.009 - - 0.188 0.078 HCM Control Delay (s) 83.4 0 9.3 0 - 7.8 0 - 29.4 13.9
HCM Lane LOS F A A A - A A - D B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 5.5 - 0.2 - - 0 - - 0.7 0.3

Page 406 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
4: Grove Ave & Bellevue Rd Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 1) Conditions AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 190 10 10 580 10 10 20 10 0 10 40 Future Vol, veh/h 10 190 10 10 580 10 10 20 10 0 10 40
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 20 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 11 216 11 11 659 11 11 23 11 0 11 45
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 670 0 0 227 0 0 601 936 222 948 936 335 Stage 1 - - - - - - 244 244 - 687 687 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 357 692 - 261 249 -
Critical Hdwy 4.145 - - 4.145 - - 7.345 6.545 6.245 7.345 6.545 6.945 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.145 5.545 - 6.545 5.545 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.545 5.545 - 6.145 5.545 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2285 - - 2.2285 - - 3.5285 4.0285 3.3285 3.5285 4.0285 3.3285 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 912 - - 1333 - - 396 263 814 226 263 659 Stage 1 - - - - - - 756 701 - 402 445 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 632 442 - 741 698 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 912 - - 1333 - - 349 256 814 204 256 659 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 349 256 - 204 256 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 745 691 - 396 439 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 566 436 - 697 688 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 0.1 17.1 13.1

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 281 814 912 - - 1333 - - 501
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.121 0.014 0.012 - - 0.009 - - 0.113 HCM Control Delay (s) 19.6 9.5 9 0 - 7.7 0 - 13.1
HCM Lane LOS C A A A - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 0 - - 0 - - 0.4

Page 407 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
5: Vine Ave & Bellevue Rd Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 1) Conditions AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 60 140 0 0 490 0 0 0 0 10 0 80
Future Vol, veh/h 60 140 0 0 490 0 0 0 0 10 0 80
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 68 159 0 0 557 0 0 0 0 11 0 91
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 557 0 0 159 0 0 574 852 81 774 852 279 Stage 1 - - - - - - 295 295 - 557 557 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 279 557 - 217 295 -
Critical Hdwy 4.18 - - 4.18 - - 7.58 6.58 6.98 7.58 6.58 6.98 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.58 5.58 - 6.58 5.58 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.58 5.58 - 6.58 5.58 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.24 - - 2.24 - - 3.54 4.04 3.34 3.54 4.04 3.34 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 996 - - 1403 - - 397 292 956 285 292 712 Stage 1 - - - - - - 683 663 - 477 505 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 698 505 - 760 663 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 996 - - 1403 - - 326 270 955 268 270 712 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 326 270 - 268 270 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 632 613 - 441 505 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 609 505 - 702 613 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 2.8 0 0 12.2

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) - 996 - - 1403 - - 601
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.068 - - - - - 0.17
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 8.9 0.2 - 0 - - 12.2
HCM Lane LOS A A A - A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.2 - - 0 - - 0.6

Page 408 of 498 ends

HCM 6th AWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
6: Vine Ave & Fruitland Ave Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 1) Conditions AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.4
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 20 0 30 70 70 0 20 30 90 30 10
Future Vol, veh/h 10 20 0 30 70 70 0 20 30 90 30 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 11 23 0 34 80 80 0 23 34 102 34 11
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 8 8.5 7.6 8.7

HCM LOS A A A A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 0% 33% 18% 69%
Vol Thru, % 40% 67% 41% 23%
Vol Right, % 60% 0% 41% 8%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 50 30 170 130
LT Vol 0 10 30 90
Through Vol 20 20 70 30
RT Vol 30 0 70 10
Lane Flow Rate 57 34 193 148
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.067 0.045 0.229 0.189
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.276 4.709 4.259 4.617
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 838 762 846 779
Service Time 2.301 2.73 2.274 2.638
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.068 0.045 0.228 0.19
HCM Control Delay 7.6 8 8.5 8.7
HCM Lane LOS A A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 0.1 0.9 0.7

Page 409 of 498 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Bellevue Rd Realignment Project 7: N Winton Way & Fruitland Ave Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 1) Conditions AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 320 0 500 0 0 0 540 390 0 0 420 520 Future Volume (veh/h) 320 0 500 0 0 0 540 390 0 0 420 520 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 0 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 348 0 0 0 0 0 587 424 0 0 457 103
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 3 3
Cap, veh/h 0 0 0 4 0 852 3100 0 0 976 428
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.28 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 0 1856 0 1767 3618 0 0 3618 1547
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0.0 0 0 0 587 424 0 0 457 103
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1856 0 1767 1763 0 0 1763 1547 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 4.5 2.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 4.5 2.1 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 4 0 852 3100 0 0 976 428
V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.24 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 1835 0 2345 3487 0 0 3487 1530
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 12.5 11.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 12.8 11.9 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 0 1011 560
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 5.6 12.6
Approach LOS A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 41.5 25.0 16.5 0.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 41.0 55.0 41.0 41.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 12.7 6.5 0.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.8 2.0 3.4 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.1
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

Page 410 of 498 ends

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Bellevue Rd Realignment Project 8: N Winton Way & Bellevue Rd Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 1) Conditions AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 90 210 20 40 260 290 150 490 110 310 390 110 Future Volume (veh/h) 90 210 20 40 260 290 150 490 110 310 390 110 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 98 228 18 43 283 200 163 533 60 337 424 104 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 128 868 68 57 442 303 207 840 372 398 972 236 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.26 0.26 0.03 0.22 0.22 0.12 0.24 0.24 0.22 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 3311 259 1767 1994 1365 1767 3526 1563 1767 2807 682 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 98 121 125 43 249 234 163 533 60 337 265 263 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1763 1808 1767 1763 1597 1767 1763 1563 1767 1763 1727 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.8 3.8 3.9 1.7 9.0 9.4 6.3 9.5 2.1 12.8 8.1 8.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.8 3.8 3.9 1.7 9.0 9.4 6.3 9.5 2.1 12.8 8.1 8.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.14 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.40
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 128 462 474 57 391 354 207 840 372 398 610 598 V/C Ratio(X) 0.76 0.26 0.26 0.75 0.64 0.66 0.79 0.63 0.16 0.85 0.43 0.44 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 478 1382 1417 478 1382 1251 478 2763 1225 1108 1382 1354 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.9 20.5 20.5 33.7 24.7 24.9 30.1 24.0 21.2 26.0 17.7 17.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.0 0.3 0.3 17.8 1.7 2.1 6.5 0.8 0.2 5.1 0.5 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.9 1.5 1.5 1.0 3.7 3.5 2.9 3.7 0.7 5.5 3.0 3.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 41.0 20.8 20.8 51.5 26.5 27.0 36.6 24.8 21.4 31.1 18.1 18.2 LnGrp LOS D C C D C C D C C C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 344 526 756 865
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.6 28.8 27.1 23.2
Approach LOS C C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.3 22.9 12.2 28.8 9.1 20.1 19.8 21.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s19.0 55.0 19.0 55.0 19.0 55.0 44.0 55.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s3.7 5.9 8.3 10.3 5.8 11.4 14.8 11.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 1.4 0.3 3.3 0.2 3.2 1.0 3.9 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.0
HCM 6th LOS C

Page 411 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
9: Atwater Blvd & SR 99 On-Ramps Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 1) Conditions AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.6
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 40 380 50 200 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 40 380 50 200 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - Free - None
Storage Length 150 - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 43 413 54 217 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 54 0 - 0 553 54
Stage 1 - - - - 54 -
Stage 2 - - - - 499 -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - - 6.44 6.24
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.44 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.44 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.236 - - - 3.536 3.336
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1539 - - 0 491 1008
Stage 1 - - - 0 963 -
Stage 2 - - - 0 606 -
Platoon blocked, % - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1539 - - - 477 1008
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 477 -
Stage 1 - - - - 936 -
Stage 2 - - - - 606 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 1539 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.028 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 - - 0
HCM Lane LOS A - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - -

Page 412 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
1: SR 99 Southbound Ramps & Westside Blvd Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 1) Conditions PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 26.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 160 70 60 100 0 0 0 0 410 10 20
Future Vol, veh/h 0 160 70 60 100 0 0 0 0 410 10 20
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - Stop
Storage Length - - - 320 - - - - - - - 620
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 0 182 80 68 114 0 0 0 0 466 11 23
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 262 0 0 472 512 114
Stage 1 - - - - - - 250 250 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 222 262 -
Critical Hdwy - - - 4.13 - - 6.43 6.53 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.43 5.53 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.43 5.53 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.227 - - 3.527 4.027 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1296 - 0 549 464 936
Stage 1 0 - - - - 0 789 698 -
Stage 2 0 - - - - 0 813 690 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1296 - - 520 0 936
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 520 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 789 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 771 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 3 48.1

HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBT SBLn1 SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h) - - 1296 - 520 936
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.053 - 0.918 0.024
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 7.9 - 50 8.9
HCM Lane LOS - - A - F A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.2 - 11 0.1

Page 413 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
2: SR 99 Northbound Ramps & Westside Blvd Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 1) Conditions PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 30 540 0 0 140 200 20 10 60 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 30 540 0 0 140 200 20 10 60 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - Stop - - None
Storage Length 350 - - - - - - - 410 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 34 614 0 0 159 227 23 11 68 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 386 0 - - - 0 955 1068 614
Stage 1 - - - - - - 682 682 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 273 386 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - - - - 6.43 6.53 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.43 5.53 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.43 5.53 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - - - - 3.527 4.027 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1167 - 0 0 - - 285 221 490
Stage 1 - - 0 0 - - 500 448 -
Stage 2 - - 0 0 - - 771 608 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1167 - - - - - 277 0 490
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 277 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 486 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 771 0 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 0 15.6

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT WBT WBR
Capacity (veh/h) 277 490 1167 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.123 0.139 0.029 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 19.8 13.5 8.2 - - -
HCM Lane LOS C B A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.5 0.1 - - -

Page 414 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
3: Olive Avenue & Westside Blvd/Bellevue Rd Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 1) Conditions PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 40 480 80 0 240 10 60 30 10 10 40 40 Future Vol, veh/h 40 480 80 0 240 10 60 30 10 10 40 40
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 30 - - 30
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 45 545 91 0 273 11 68 34 11 11 45 45
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 284 0 0 636 0 0 1005 965 591 982 1005 279 Stage 1 - - - - - - 681 681 - 279 279 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 324 284 - 703 726 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - 4.13 - - 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - 2.227 - - 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1273 - - 943 - - 219 254 505 227 240 757 Stage 1 - - - - - - 439 449 - 725 678 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 686 675 - 427 428 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1273 - - 943 - - 167 240 505 190 227 757 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 167 240 - 190 227 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 414 424 - 684 678 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 602 675 - 362 404 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 0 42.4 19.6

HCM LOS E C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 186 505 1273 - - 943 - - 218 757
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.55 0.023 0.036 - - - - - 0.261 0.06 HCM Control Delay (s) 45.7 12.3 7.9 0 - 0 - - 27.2 10.1 HCM Lane LOS E B A A - A - - D B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.9 0.1 0.1 - - 0 - - 1 0.2

Page 415 of 498 ends

HCM 6th TWSC Bellevue Rd Realignment Project
4: Grove Ave & Bellevue Rd Design Year Plus Project (Alternative 1) Conditions PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 40 460 0 10 230 0 0 10 10 0 10 20
Future Vol, veh/h 40 460 0 10 230 0 0 10 10 0 10 20
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 20 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 45 523 0 11 261 0 0 11 11 0 11 23
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 261 0 0 523 0 0 771 896 523 907 896 131 Stage 1 - - - - - - 613 613 - 283 283 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 158 283 - 624 613 -
Critical Hdwy 4.145 - - 4.145 - - 7.345 6.545 6.245 7.345 6.545 6.945 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.145 5.545 - 6.545 5.545 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.545 5.545 - 6.145 5.545 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2285 - - 2.2285 - - 3.5285 4.0285 3.3285 3.5285 4.0285 3.3285 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1295 - - 1036 - - 302 278 551 242 278 892 Stage 1 - - - - - - 477 480 - 698 674 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 826 674 - 470 480 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1295 - - 1036 - - 271 261 551 219 261 892 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 271 261 - 219 261 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 454 456 - 664 666 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 782 666 - 427 456 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0.4 15.6 12.8

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 261 551 1295 - - 1036 - - 494
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.044 0.021 0.035 - - 0.011 - - 0.069 HCM Control Delay (s) 19.4 11.7 7.9 0 - 8.5 0 - 12.8
HCM Lane LOS C B A A - A A - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.2

Page 416 of 498 ends
← All documents from this meeting