Agenda packet, second session — Atwater City Council, January 22, 2024 (part 2 of 2)

Scope of Services to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 2 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Project Scope of Services
Per the request of the City of Atwater, Minagar & Associates, Inc. shall provide the following specific scope of services for the design of Atwater Traffic Signals Synchronization Project. The following sections detail Minagar’s approach and task-by-task breakdown to ensure an effective and efficient delivery of this project.

Task 1 – Project Management and Meetings
Minagar will initiate the project with a kick-off meeting, where the project goals, objectives, scope of work, tasks, and schedule will be confirmed. Following this kick-off meeting, the project site will be visited and existing conditions will be assessed. Minagar & Associates, Inc. has already taken initiative to visit the project site and
review existing conditions as well as
past City efforts to improve traffic
signals and synchronization, as
summarized in the figures below and
on the following pages.

Minagar & Associates, Inc. will have one preliminary design meeting to identify any potential conflicts or issues that could cause delays in the design and construction process. At this meeting, Minagar will depict the design approach, identify required ITS hardware to be used, identify any potential conflicts with utilities and existing features, and depict the existing and proposed signal interconnect layout.

Plan check comments review meetings for each submittal, meetings will be held via Zoom/Teams.

Corridors 1, 2, and 3 of the Project Location Map (Traffic Signals 1-10) WINTON WY SHAFFER RD

BUHACH RD

FRUITLAND AVE

BELLEVUE RD

Page 179 of 282 ends

Scope of Services to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 3 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
#1: Fruitland Ave &
Winton Way
#2: Winton Way &
Bellevue Rd
#3: Bellevue Rd &
Seventh St
#4: Bellevue Rd & Linden
St
#5: Bellevue Rd &
Redwood Ave
#6: Fruitland Ave &
Winton Way

#7: Bellevue Rd &
Granite Dr/Crest Rd
#8: Bellevue Rd & Buhach
Rd
#9: Winton Way &
Juniper Ave
#10: Shaeffer Rd & Juniper Ave
LEGEND

Page 180 of 282 ends

Scope of Services to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 4 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Corridors 4 and 5 of the Project Location Map (Traffic Signals 11-17) #11: Buhach Rd &
Juniper Ave/Ave Two
#12: Buhach Rd & Ave
One
#13: Buhach Rd & Green
Sands Ave
#14: Buhach Rd &
Atwater-Merced Expy
#15: Buhach Rd &
Gurr Rd
#16: Buhach Rd &
Clover Ave
#17: Buhach Rd
& Ashby Rd

GURR RD

GREEN SANDS AVE

BUHACH RD

Page 181 of 282 ends

Proposal to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 5 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Project Location Map

GURR RD

JUNIPER AVE

BELLEVUE RD
GREEN SANDS 5
4 3
2 1
13 14 15
12 11
6 7 8
10 9
1 2
3 4 5

WINTON WY

SHAFFER RD

BUHACH RD

FRUITLAND AVE
LEGEND
Traffic Signal Number
170E Controller Type
2070 E/L Controller Type
Corridor Number
0 0
16 17

Page 182 of 282 ends

Proposal to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 6 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Minagar & Associates, Inc. has also taken initiative to review the City of Atwater’s past traffic signal interconnect projects to ensure uniformity and consistency with work that is to be done under this upcoming project. Minagar has closely examined the previous Traffic Signal Interconnect Project at Bell Lane, Bell Drive, Commerce Avenue, Applegate Road, and Winton Way in the City of Atwater and taken a field visit to observe the completed project objectives as well. This is summarized in the following images.

Improvements at Bell Drive/Commerce Ave at Applegate Rd

Page 183 of 282 ends

Proposal to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 7 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Wireless Radio Antenna Installed at Bell Drive/Commerce Ave at Applegate Rd

Page 184 of 282 ends

Proposal to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 8 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Field Observations - Existing Wireless Rado Antenna at Atwater Blvd & Winton Way/Applegate Rd
Any locations requiring design and implementation of wireless radio antenna will maintain consistency with the existing design and equipment brands and types, as shown above in the intersections of Bell Drive/Commerce Ave & Applegate Rd and Winton Way/Applegate Rd & Atwater Blvd.

Equipment to be implemented that will match existing technologies include:
• McCain 2070 Plug-In 2070-7G
• Wireless Broadband System – ENCOME
• Industrial Ethernet Swithc ML 510D Actelis Networks

Page 185 of 282 ends

Proposal to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 9 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Field Observation - Existing Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS) at Olive Ave & Winton Way
Similarly, any locations requiring design and implementation of an Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS) will be designed to be consistent with existing APS such as the one pictured above at Olive Ave & Winton Way.

Task 2 – Signal Interconnect Improvement Plans
Minagar will create signal interconnect
improvement plans with existing roadway
features, including sidewalks, signal cabinets,
traffic signal poles, and median islands
overlaid. Existing records, plans, aerials, and
site investigations will be utilized to provide a
complete base map. Signal interconnect
improvement plans will include a cover sheet,
improvement plans and demolition plans (as
necessary), IP address scheme sheets, details
sheets, existing utilities, and PS&E
deliverables.

Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA)
Guidelines for Creating a Traffic Signal
Management/Implementation Plan
DELIVERABLES: Signal Interconnect Improvement Plans

Page 186 of 282 ends

Proposal to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 10 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Task 2 Deliverables to include the following items:

Cover Sheet – Minagar & Associates, Inc. shall include general notes, legend, abbreviations, project title, sheet index, overall project map with sheet limits shown, vicinity map, utility company contacts, and other items as determined necessary by the City.

Signal Interconnect Improvement Plans and Demolition Plans (as necessary) - These drawings shall show all proposed improvements. Plan scale will most likely be 1”=40’ horizontal and 1”=2’ vertical. Some areas may require larger scales to show the appropriate amount of detail required for construction. Drawing scales shall be determined by Minagar & Associates, Inc. and approved by City. Each drawing shall show the plan view of the proposed improvements. The existing base map information shall be faded in the background of the plans and shall be plan readable at 50% plotted size. The minimum size for all text shall be 0.1”.

Civil Plan and Profile Drawings shall include, but not be limited to the following items:
• Removal and replacement information for all effected improvements. • Locations of utilities that are being relocated (as necessary). • Depict the location of all existing utilities (as identified through completion of base map).

This would only apply to areas where new poles (if any) are proposed to be installed (if any).
• Hatching patterns, where applicable, shall properly define construction. • Dimensions where necessary.
• Construction Keynotes to direct Construction Activities. • All sheet match lines shall have sheet references listed.

IP Address Scheme Sheet(s) – Minagar & Associates, Inc. shall prepare an IP Address Scheme via consultation with the City of Atwater IT staff. The IP Scheme shall be included on a plan sheet. The IP scheme shall include but not be limited to the wireless radios, the switches and any other equipment needed to have a fully operational interconnected traffic signal system.

Details Sheets (including equipment details, other details, Caltrans Standard Plans, and City Standard Details) – These sheets shall include details needed for all the proposed work and are not limited to details for trenches, pull boxes, equipment installation, and any other details deemed necessary to adequately direct construction activities. All details referenced on the plans shall be included on the detail sheets. All plans shall be on City of Atwater title block. All plans shall be prepared in sufficient detail to provide the necessary guidance for construction as determined by the City Engineer.

Existing Utilities – Minagar & Associates, Inc. shall be responsible for acquiring all record utility maps within the project limits and for showing existing utilities on the plans. The base map shall call out the size and type of pipe for all water, gas, sewer, and storm drain lines, manholes, vaults, and other underground structures shown on utility plats. However, this will only be required for the area(s) in the vicinity of new poles proposed by Minagar & Associates, Inc.’s design. Minagar & Associates, Inc. shall describe why, as part of the PS&E, utility mapping would be needed or not. In the case that it is needed, Minagar & Associates, Inc. shall be specific as to the area of the need.

For the 50%, 90%, and 100% submittals, the Plans, Specifications, and Estimate shall be submitted to the City electronically. For the Final Plans, one (1) wet signed set shall be provided on a 4-mil minimum thickness translucent Mylar film for City Signatures. Minagar & Associates, Inc. shall scan and return the signed Mylar cover sheet together with five (5) copies of the signed plans on 20lb.

Page 187 of 282 ends

Proposal to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 11 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
bright white bond. As-Built plans shall be submitted to the City both electronically and on of 4- mil minimum thickness translucent Mylar film.

Minagar & Associates, Inc. shall provide the following: 1 copy of electronic submittals (MS Word, MS Excel, Adobe PDF, AutoCAD in most recent formats) for the 50%, 90%, and 100% plan submittal, 6 sets of Final Plans, 2 sets of final Project specifications, 1 copy of final cost estimate, 1 set of PS&E redlines with each submittal (50%, 90%, 100%), 1 set of as-built plans (full Size and Electronic).

Task 3 – Project Specifications and Cost Estimate
Minagar shall then
prepare construction
plans, special
provisions, a bid
item schedule, and
bid item
descriptions. Our
plans are prepared
in accordance with the latest
California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD 2014)/Federal December 2023 and Caltrans Standard Plans (2023).

Minagar & Associates, Inc. shall identify and per City’s approval select the most appropriate ATMS (Advanced Traffic Management System) software for the City of Atwater based on the existing and future mobility needs.

Minagar & Associates, Inc. shall prepare the following portions of the construction specifications for all the items listed in the bid schedule and the cost estimate. The City will provide Minagar & Associates, Inc. with the City’s Bid Books template in MS Word electronic file format, in which Minagar & Associates, Inc. shall complete the following sections to correspond with the construction plans:
i. Special Provisions
ii. Bid Item Schedule (also provide in MS Excel electronic file format with calculations) iii. Bid Item Descriptions including the measurement and payment for each bid item for the project.

All proposed signage and pavement markings items are identified on our plans both by construction note and MUTCD code. We can also prepare construction plans with quantity tables and detail plan sheets with sign types, typical installation locations, sign color, text, pictographs, dimensions, retro reflectivity, mounting/post/fastener/support size, type and material.

DELIVERABLES: Cost Estimate & Bid Item Schedule
50%, 90%, and 100% PS&E

Page 188 of 282 ends

Proposal to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 12 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Sample Minagar & Associates, Inc. Traffic Signal Plans

Page 189 of 282 ends

Proposal to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 13 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Task 4 – Coordinated Signal Timing Plans
Minagar utilizes SYNCHRO® 11.0 and SimTraffic© 11.0
micro-computer simulation modules to build traffic signal network models, analyze intersections/systems and
develop optimized traffic signal timing plans to deploy in the field. Our traffic modeling services include preparing a baseline model of the signal network based on existing field and office data collection, developing a set of optimized proposed peak hour timing plans based on the simulation results, and recommending any changes or improvements
to optimize efficiency of operations. In the development of the study area model, which will depict existing conditions and any deficiencies observed during field visits, Minagar will collaborate with the agencies to ensure accurate
representation.

Subsequently, Minagar shall prepare weekday AM and PM
coordinated signal timing plans for the seventeen (17) project intersections. Minagar & Associates, Inc. shall prepare the traffic signal timing optimization/coordination/synchronization per the latest state-of-practice, state-of-the-art & state-of-technology in the State of California. These may include but need not be limited to field review, data collection, development of the existing conditions Synchro model network, Synchro model calibration, draft signal timing recommendations, final signal timing recommendations, field implementation, fine tuning, and before and after travel time studies.

Minagar & Associates, Inc. shall provide electronic copies and paper copies of the signal timing cards signed by a
Licensed Professional Engineer. All timing plans shall be compliant with the latest edition of the California MUTCD and delivered in Adobe PDF and MS Excel electronic file formats.

It is anticipated that timing plans will be reviewed by the City. The City will provide comments and Minagar & Associates, Inc. shall address comments. If, in the opinion of Minagar & associates, Inc., any of the comments contradict a standard practice and/or the California MUTCD, then Minagar & Associates, Inc. shall bring the apparent conflict to the attention of the City and be prepared to discuss it with City staff.

Following the implementation of the updated signal synchronization timing, Minagar will conduct the travel time “After” study to evaluate the effectiveness of the new changes. For consistency and accuracy in evaluating improvements, the ‘After’ field study reports will be conducted in the same manner and contain the same MOE’s as the ‘Before’ study conducted prior to the project.

DELIVERABLES: Calibrated Existing Conditions Synchro Model Network

Page 190 of 282 ends

Proposal to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 14 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Draft Coordinated Signal Timing Report
Final Coordinated Signal Timing Report
Before and After Travel Time Studies Report
Final Coordinated Signal Timing Plans
Final Timing Charts/Cards
Task 5 – Project Schedule
Minagar shall track and update the project schedule monthly or as needed during the project process to ensure the most efficient path of work and adjust to any issues or conflicts that may arise. The proposed project schedule is shown on the following page; however, this schedule is tentative and subject to change until its finalization at the project kick-off meeting.

DELIVERABLES: Minagar & Associates, Inc. shall provide updates to the project schedule monthly during the course of work or as needed. The project schedule be submitted in hard copy and electronically in PDF format.

Year
Month
NTP = Week 1* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 1 1W
1W 1W 1W 1W 1W
2 3
1W
4 5
6 1 = Within One Week * Tentative Notice-to-Proceed Milestone 2W
May
3W
Jan Apr Jun
3W
2024
ATMS & Engineering Support During
Construction
Prepare Plans
Review Existing Data and Conditions
Task #
Kick-Off Meeting
Final Signal Timing Plans
Project Meetings
ATMS & Engineering Support During Construction
Project Schedule
Update Schedule as Necessary
Progress Meetings/Status Update
Signal Interconnect Improvement Plans
Feb Mar
Coordinated Signal Timing Plans
Draft Signal Timing Plans
Project Specifications and Cost Estimate
90% PS&E
50% PS&E
100% PS&E
Final PS&E
2W
2W
3W
3W

Page 191 of 282 ends

Proposal to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 15 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Task 6 – ATMS and Engineering Support During Construction Minagar & Associates, Inc. shall provide Construction Engineering services as needed during the course of bidding and construction. Examples of required services include but are not limited to:
i. Respond to Requests for Information.
ii. Review Contractor’s Materials Submittals.
iii. Review Shop Drawings.
iv. Prepare and issue clarifications and/or revisions to Construction Documents. v. Observe and provide inspection of construction activities. vi. Verify City’s measurements needed to establish pay quantities. vii. Provide construction staking (if required).
viii. Review materials testing results from City’s third-party Special Inspection and Testing firm
ix. Provide System Integration services of all synchronized traffic signals and ATMS software for a fully functional traffic management system/center with all required features and functionality, with services to include but not be limited to:
(1) Procure, provide, and support the specified ATMS software for installation on City computers and/or server. If ATMS software is cloud based, then provide coordination and support for installation and configuration for any required client-side software and plugins. (2) Provide startup, configuration, and training for ATMS software. (3) Coordinate the ATMS portion of the project with the construction schedule to avoid project delays.
(4) Provide documentation for system Operations and Maintenance. x. Prepare punch list at substantial completion of construction activities. xi. Prepare Record Drawings (As Built Plans).
(1) Refer to Task 2 for specific requirements.

Page 192 of 282 ends

EXHIBIT B
(FEE SCHEDULE)

Page 193 of 282 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-H2
Consultant
Project No. Contract No. CML-5254(034) Date
For Combined Rate + =
For Home Office Rate 0.00% + 0.00% =
For Field Office Rate 0.00% + 0.00% =
=
Actual or Avg. % or $
Straight3 OT(1.5x) OT(2x) From To Hourly Rate4 Increase $ 231.66 N/A N/A 1/1/2024 12/31/2024 $ 83.11
$ 238.61 N/A N/A 1/1/2025 12/31/2025 $ 85.60 3.00%
$ 245.77 N/A N/A 1/1/2026 12/31/2026 $ 88.17 3.00%
$ 253.14 N/A N/A 1/1/2027 12/31/2027 $ 90.82 3.00%
$ 167.24 N/A N/A 1/1/2024 12/31/2024 $ 60.00
$ 172.26 N/A N/A 1/1/2025 12/31/2025 $ 61.80 3.00%
$ 177.43 N/A N/A 1/1/2026 12/31/2026 $ 63.65 3.00%
$ 182.75 N/A N/A 1/1/2027 12/31/2027 $ 65.56 3.00%
$ 167.24 N/A N/A 1/1/2024 12/31/2024 $ 60.00
$ 172.26 N/A N/A 1/1/2025 12/31/2025 $ 61.80 3.00%
$ 177.43 N/A N/A 1/1/2026 12/31/2026 $ 63.65 3.00%
$ 182.75 N/A N/A 1/1/2027 12/31/2027 $ 65.56 3.00%
$ 71.13 $ 106.70 $ 142.27 1/1/2024 12/31/2024 $ 25.52
$ 73.27 $ 109.90 $ 146.54 1/1/2025 12/31/2025 $ 26.29 3.00% $ 75.47 $ 113.20 $ 150.93 1/1/2026 12/31/2026 $ 27.07 3.00% $ 77.73 $ 116.60 $ 155.46 1/1/2027 12/31/2027 $ 27.89 3.00% NOTES:

Engineering Support**
Not Applicable
(Add pages as necessary)

3. Billing rate = actual hourly rate * (1+ ICR) * (1+ Fee). Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant’s annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans. All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles for reimbursement.

4. For named employees and key personnel enter the actual hourly rate. For classifications only, enter the Average Hourly Rate for that classification.

2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended.

1. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**).All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals.

Fringe Benefit %
EXHIBIT 10-H2 COST PROPOSAL Page 1 of 3

SPECIFIC RATE OF COMPENSATION (USE FOR ON-CALL OR AS-NEEDED CONTRACTS) (CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION CONTRACTS)
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

City Project No. 23-01 Participation Amount $
for Classifications Only
Not Applicable
OR
General & Admninistrative %

0.00%

0.00%
Fee 10%
Fred Minagar* - Principal
Engineer/Project Manager
Senior Systems Engineer
Senior Traffic Signal Engineer
Name/Job Title/Classification¹ Hourly Billing Rates2 Effective Date of Hourly Rate

BILLING INFORMATION CALCULATION INFORMATION
Hourly Range -
Not Applicable
Cost Proposal
1/9/2024
153.40%
Combined Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) %
Not Applicable
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant
LPP 15-01 January 2020

Page 194 of 282 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-H2
Cost Proposal
Consultant
Project No. Contract No. Date 1/9/2024
Quantity Unit Unit Cost
At IRS 2024 ($0.67)
At Cost
At Cost
NOTES:

3. Items when incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstance, should not be included in any indirect cost pool or in the overhead rate.

4. Items such as special tooling, will be reimbursed at actual cost with supporting documentation (invoice).

5. Items listed above that would be considered "tools of the trade" are not reimbursable as other direct cost.

11. Subconsultants must provide their own cost proposals.

6. Travel related costs should be pre-approved by the contracting agency and shall not exceed current State Department of Personnel Administration rules.

7. If mileage is claimed, the rate should be properly supported by the consultant's calculation of their actual costs for company vehicles. In addition, the miles claimed should besupported by mileage logs.

8. If a consultant proposes rental costs for a vehicle, the company must demonstrate that this is its standard procedure for all of their contracts and that they do not own any vehiclesthat could be used for the same purpose.

9. The cost proposal format shall not be amended. All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles.

10. Add additional pages if necessary.

TBD

1. List other direct cost items with estimated costs. These costs should be competitive in their respective industries and supported with appropriate documentation.

2. Proposed ODC items should be consistently billed regardless of client and contract type. $0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Note: Add additional pages if necessary.

Subconsultant 2:

Subconsultant 3:

Subconsultant 4:

Subconsultant 5:

Delivery/Postage
Subconsultant 1:

Total
Mileage Costs
Copies/Reproduction
Description of Item
EXHIBIT 10-H2 COST PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3

SPECIFIC RATE OF COMPENSATION (USE FOR ON-CALL OR AS-NEEDED CONTRACTS) (CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION CONTRACTS)
SCHEDULE OF OTHER DIRECT COST ITEMS (Add additional pages as necessary) MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

CML-5254(034)
TBD
TBD
City Project No. 23-01
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant
LPP 15-01 January 2020

Page 195 of 282 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-H2
Cost Proposal
Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name: Title *:

Signature : Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Email: Phone Number:

Address:

List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

EXHIBIT 10-H2 COST PROPOSAL Page 3 of 3

11. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration ofEngineering and Design Related Service

12. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) Fred Minagar Principal-in-Charge/Director/Principal Engin Certification of Direct Costs
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.

7. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

8. Terms and conditions of the contract

9. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

10. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures Providing ITS/Traffic/Systems/Civil Engineering & Support CEM Services *An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract. 23282 Mill Creek Drive, East Tower, Suite 120, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 [email protected] 949-707-1199, Extension 2#
1/9/2024
LPP 15-01 January 2020

Page 196 of 282 ends

EXHIBIT C
(Cost Proposal)

Page 197 of 282 ends

MANHOURS & LEVELS OF EFFORTS ESTIMATES
City of ATWATER
Citywide Traffic Signal Synchronization Project
100% Design Phase
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

DIRECT
TASK AND DESCRIPTION PM PE SE FM SD EA COST* TOTAL
1 Project Management & Meetings 85 0 0 0 0 8 $0 $20,260 2 Signal Interconnect Improvement Plans (50%, 90%, 100%, Final Plans & As-Built Plans) 88 98 104 0 78 120 $1,904 $83,9663 Project Specifications & Cost Estimates 45 12 0 0 0 48 $0 $16,6194 Coordinated Signal Timing Plans 65 18 180 18 45 76 $39,756 $104,3115 Project Schedule 20 0 0 0 0 9 $0 $5,273 Total Hours 303 128 284 18 123 261
Hourly Rate $231.66 $231.66 $167.24 $127.36 $167.24 $71.13 $0 Total Labor Cost ($) $70,193 $29,652 $47,496 $2,292 $20,571 $18,565 $41,660 $230,429.55 TOTAL COST NOT TO EXCEED $230,429.55
PM Project Manager PE Project Engineer SE Senior Engineer SD Senior Designer EA Engineering Assistant FM Field Manager/Dep Rep 1/9/2024
NOTES: All the outlined above tasks shall be performed per the total above.

DBE Subconsultant's Total Direct Cost is $41,660.00 Per Attachments. For the PE Design Phase in 2024, all the above rates shall remain the same.TASK 6 ATMS and Engineering Support During Construction NOT TO EXCEED 10% of the Total Construction Cost. Since no ATMS Vendor is selected at this time no specifc cost can be allocated

Page 198 of 282 ends

1 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
z
PREPARED BY:

MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

ITS – Traffic/Civil/Electrical Engineering – Transportation Planning – Homeland Security – CEM 23282 Mill Creek Drive, East Tower, Suite 120
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
PREPARED FOR:

CITY OF ATWATER
Community Development Department
750 Bellevue Road
Atwater, CA 95301
Scope of Services
for
Citywide Traffic Signals Synchronization Project
City of Atwater, CA
Traffic Signal Synchronization Project Location Map in the City of Atwater City of Atwater’s Sample Intersection 1:

Fruitland Ave at Winton Way
IN ASSOCIATION WITH:

AimTD LLC
155 N Riverview Drive, Suite 100
Anaheim, CA 92808
December 16, 2023

City of Modesto’s Traffic Signal Synchronization of 145 Traffic Signals & ATMS Design
City of Colton’s Traffic Signal Synchronization, Wireless Interconnect and Citywide ATMS Design PS&E

Page 199 of 282 ends

Scope of Services to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 2 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Plan check comments review meetings for each submittal, meetings will be held via Zoom/Teams.

Corridors 1, 2, and 3 of the Project Location Map (Traffic Signals 1-10) WINTON WY SHAFFER RD

BUHACH RD

FRUITLAND AVE

BELLEVUE RD

Page 200 of 282 ends

Scope of Services to Provide Design Services for

#7: Bellevue Rd &
Granite Dr/Crest Rd
#8: Bellevue Rd & Buhach
Rd
#9: Winton Way &
Juniper Ave
#10: Shaeffer Rd & Juniper Ave
LEGEND

Page 201 of 282 ends

Scope of Services to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 4 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

GURR RD

GREEN SANDS AVE

BUHACH RD

Page 202 of 282 ends

Proposal to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 5 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Project Location Map

GURR RD

JUNIPER AVE

BELLEVUE RD
GREEN SANDS 5
4 3
2 1
13 14 15
12 11
6 7 8
10 9
1 2
3 4 5

WINTON WY

SHAFFER RD

BUHACH RD

FRUITLAND AVE
LEGEND
Traffic Signal Number
170E Controller Type
2070 E/L Controller Type
Corridor Number
0 0
16 17

Page 203 of 282 ends

Proposal to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 6 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Improvements at Bell Drive/Commerce Ave at Applegate Rd

Page 204 of 282 ends

Proposal to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 7 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Wireless Radio Antenna Installed at Bell Drive/Commerce Ave at Applegate Rd

Page 205 of 282 ends

Proposal to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 8 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Page 206 of 282 ends

Proposal to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 9 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA)
Guidelines for Creating a Traffic Signal
Management/Implementation Plan
DELIVERABLES: Signal Interconnect Improvement Plans

Page 207 of 282 ends

Proposal to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 10 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Task 2 Deliverables to include the following items:

Page 208 of 282 ends

Proposal to Provide Design Services for

DELIVERABLES: Cost Estimate & Bid Item Schedule
50%, 90%, and 100% PS&E

Page 209 of 282 ends

Proposal to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 12 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Sample Minagar & Associates, Inc. Traffic Signal Plans

Page 210 of 282 ends

Proposal to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 13 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

DELIVERABLES: Calibrated Existing Conditions Synchro Model Network

Page 211 of 282 ends

Proposal to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 14 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Page 212 of 282 ends

Proposal to Provide Design Services for

CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CITY OF ATWATER, CA 15 MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Page 213 of 282 ends

Engineering Support**
Not Applicable
(Add pages as necessary)

4. For named employees and key personnel enter the actual hourly rate. For classifications only, enter the Average Hourly Rate for that classification.

2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended.

Fringe Benefit %
EXHIBIT 10-H2 COST PROPOSAL Page 1 of 3

SPECIFIC RATE OF COMPENSATION (USE FOR ON-CALL OR AS-NEEDED CONTRACTS) (CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION CONTRACTS)
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

City Project No. 23-01 Participation Amount $
for Classifications Only
Not Applicable
OR
General & Admninistrative %

0.00%

Page 214 of 282 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-H2
Cost Proposal
Consultant
Project No. Contract No. Date 1/9/2024
Quantity Unit Unit Cost
At IRS 2024 ($0.67)
At Cost
At Cost
NOTES:

3. Items when incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstance, should not be included in any indirect cost pool or in the overhead rate.

4. Items such as special tooling, will be reimbursed at actual cost with supporting documentation (invoice).

5. Items listed above that would be considered "tools of the trade" are not reimbursable as other direct cost.

11. Subconsultants must provide their own cost proposals.

6. Travel related costs should be pre-approved by the contracting agency and shall not exceed current State Department of Personnel Administration rules.

9. The cost proposal format shall not be amended. All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles.

10. Add additional pages if necessary.

TBD

1. List other direct cost items with estimated costs. These costs should be competitive in their respective industries and supported with appropriate documentation.

2. Proposed ODC items should be consistently billed regardless of client and contract type. $0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Note: Add additional pages if necessary.

Subconsultant 2:

Subconsultant 3:

Subconsultant 4:

Subconsultant 5:

Delivery/Postage
Subconsultant 1:

Total
Mileage Costs
Copies/Reproduction
Description of Item
EXHIBIT 10-H2 COST PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3

CML-5254(034)
TBD
TBD
City Project No. 23-01
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant
LPP 15-01 January 2020

Page 215 of 282 ends

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-H2
Cost Proposal
Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name: Title *:

Signature : Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Email: Phone Number:

Address:

List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

EXHIBIT 10-H2 COST PROPOSAL Page 3 of 3

11. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration ofEngineering and Design Related Service

7. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

8. Terms and conditions of the contract

9. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

Page 216 of 282 ends

MANHOURS & LEVELS OF EFFORTS ESTIMATES
City of ATWATER
Citywide Traffic Signal Synchronization Project
100% Design Phase
MINAGAR & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Page 217 of 282 ends

CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA REPORT

MEETING
DATE:

January 22, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Greg Thompson, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director

PREPARED
BY:

John Seymour, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Plans and Specifications for Fruitland Ave Reconstruction Phase 3 (Deputy City Manager/Community
Development Director Thompson)

RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION
Motion to approve the Plans and Specifications and authorizes advertising and calling for bids for the Fruitland Ave Phase 3 Reconstruction Project, City Project 16-2-3; or Motion to approve staff's recommendation as presented.

I. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:

In 2016, the Fruitland Avenue Reconstruction Project was approved. The project called for the roadway on Fruitland Avenue from Shaffer Road to Orchard Park to be replaced and sidewalks, curbs, and gutters to be installed where none existed. Constructing the project from Winton Way Avenue to Orchard Park to Shafffer Road in a phased approach was determined to be the best approach to leverage different funding sources.

A phased approach was approved by the City Council at their regularly scheduled meeting on March 26, 2018. Phase 1 was completed on April 7, 2020. Approximately 535 linear feet of pavement reconstruction was performed, beginning 780 feet east of the intersection of Winton Way and Fruitland Avenue and terminating approximately 690 feet west of Fruitland Avenue and Fifth Street. Phase 2 was approved on December 14, 2020. This work consisted of construction of a storm water detention basin, pump station, and associated piping.

Phase 3 of the Fruitland Reconstruction Project includes the repavement and installation of sidewalk, curb, and gutters along Fruitland Avenue from Capitola Avenue to Orchard Park Ave.

II. FISCAL IMPACTS:

CITY COUNCIL
Mike Nelson, Mayor
Danny Ambriz Tyler Button
John Cale Brian Raymond

Page 218 of 282 ends

Agenda Report - Approval of Plans and Specifications for Fruitland Ave Reconstruction Phase 3 (Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director Thompson) Page 2

Sufficient funding for the project is available from the following funding sources:

Measure V, ARPA, LTF, RSTP, and SB1.

III. LEGAL REVIEW:

This item has been reviewed by the City Attorney's Office.

IV. EXISTING POLICY:

This project is consistent with the goal numbers two (2) and six (6) of the City's 2020- 2025 Strategic Plan: to improve public safety and enhance quality of life, respectively.

V. ALTERNATIVES:

N/A
VI. INTERDEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION:

This item has been reviewed by all departments.

VII. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:

The public will have an opportunity to provide comments on this item prior to City Council action.

VIII. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The proposed action is categorically exempt under the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. The proposed project involves the operation, maintenance, leasing, licensing or minor alteration of existing public facilities, with construction of minor appurtenant structures involving negligible or no expansion of use and no possibility of significantly impacting the physical environment. Accordingly, the proposed action qualifies under Class 1 and Class 3 Categorical Exemptions (Sections 15301 and 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines).

IX. STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL:

Upon City Council approval of the plans and specifications and authorization to advertise a Call for Bids for this project, a bid call/opening date will be set and the notice inviting bids will be advertised in a local newspaper and posted in regional builders' exchanges.

Submitted by:

Greg Thompson, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director Approved by:

Page 219 of 282 ends

Agenda Report - Approval of Plans and Specifications for Fruitland Ave Reconstruction Phase 3 (Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director Thompson) Page 3

Lori Waterman, City Manager
Attachments:

1. 20170522_FRUITLAND_AVENUE_100pct

Page 220 of 282 ends

N WINTON WAY BELLEVUE RD

SHAFFER RD

ORCHARD

PARK AVE CITY OF ATWATER
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
COVER SHEET 1 N SITE VICINITY MAP N.T.S. SHEET INDEX BENCHMARK BENCHMARK FRUITLAND AVE. IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR CITY OF ATWATER FRUITLAND AVENUE CITY OF ATWATER, CALIFORNIA N ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT AGENCY APPROVALS SITE FRUITLAND AVE.

ORCHARD PARK AVE.

NONPAREIL WAY
VILLAGE WOODS DR.

KANSAS AVE.

DAKOTA ST.

N WINTON WAY
VIRGINIA ST.

SOWELL ST.

FIFTH ST.

CHARDONNAY WAY
STRAWBERRY CT.

LAURA LN.

CAPITOLA AVE.

SOQUEL AVE.

LOS ALTOS CT.

SHAFFER RD.

Page 221 of 282 ends

Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTABBREVIATIONS LEGEND PROPOSED EXISTING

LEGENDS AND ABBREVIATIONS
2 W

Page 222 of 282 ends

BP: 9+00.00 N: 1955049.8872 E: 6524892.6005 EP: 46+68.83 N: 1955062.3098 E: 6528661.4094 PC: 32+18.64 N: 1955056.3799 E: 6527211.2317 PT: 32+18.77 N: 1955056.3803 E: 6527211.3606 C1 L2 L1 S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S EP: 46+68.83 N: 1955062.3098 E: 6528661.4094 BP: 49+00.00 N: 1954309.1031 E: 6528460.3185 EP: 108+34.57 N: 1954514.0989 E: 6533935.6065 PC: 53+22.37 N: 1954487.5912 E: 6528843.1217PC: 59+03.45 N: 1954970.2422 E: 6529159.4499 PC: 95+16.08 N: 1955053.3550 E: 6532746.2257 PC: 100+21.01 N: 1954830.5907 E: 6533196.3034 PC: 105+27.45 N: 1954581.5597 E: 6533637.2909 PT: 53+99.43 N: 1954538.3841 E: 6528899.5726 PT: 60+57.36 N: 1955042.9004 E: 6529287.5202 PT: 95+90.94 N: 1955035.2772 E: 6532818.0704 PT: 100+24.63 N: 1954828.8393 E: 6533199.4710 PT: 106+11.55 N: 1954553.2324 E: 6533716.0511 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 CL-FRUITLAND-WEST D CL-FRUITLAND-EAST D Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
ALIGNMENT HORIZONTAL CONTROL 3
ORCHARD PARK AVE.

NONPAREIL WAY
VILLAGE WOODS DR.

KANSAS AVE.

DAKOTA ST.

N WINTON WAY
VIRGINIA ST.

SOWELL ST.

FIFTH ST.

CHARDONNAY WAY
STRAWBERRY CT.

LAURA LN.

CAPITOLA AVE.

SOQUEL AVE.

LOS ALTOS CT.

SHAFFER RD.

N WINTON WAY FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE N N

Page 223 of 282 ends

Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT

KEY SHEET
4 ORCHARD PARK AVE.

NONPAREIL WAY
VILLAGE WOODS DR.

KANSAS AVE.

DAKOTA ST.

N WINTON WAY
VIRGINIA ST.

SOWELL ST.

FIFTH ST.

CHARDONNAY WAY
STRAWBERRY CT.

LAURA LN.

CAPITOLA AVE.

SOQUEL AVE.

LOS ALTOS CT.

SHAFFER RD.

N WINTON WAY SHT 16 SHT 17 SHT 18
SHT 23 SHT 19 SHT 20 SHT 21 SHT 22
SHT 24 SHT 25 SHT 26 SHT 27 SHT 28 SHT 29 SHT 30
SHT 31
SHT 32
SHT 33 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE
NN LEGEND SHT #

Page 224 of 282 ends

FRUITLAND AVENUE STA. 10+46± TO STA. 22+14± ( N.T.S) FRUITLAND AVENUE STA. 23+27± TO STA. 31+28± ( N.T.S) FRUITLAND AVENUE STA. 22+14± TO STA. 23+27± ( N.T.S) FRUITLAND AVENUE STA. 50+82± TO STA. 53+76± ( N.T.S) FRUITLAND AVENUE STA. 53+76± TO STA. 54+53± ( N.T.S) FRUITLAND AVENUE STA. 63+12± TO STA. 67+20± ( N.T.S) FRUITLAND AVENUE STA. 54+53± TO STA. 63+12± ( N.T.S) FRUITLAND AVENUE STA. 31+28± TO STA. 41+70± ( N.T.S) FRUITLAND AVENUE STA. 41+70± TO STA. 45+14± ( N.T.S) Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT

STREET CROSS-SECTIONS
5

Page 225 of 282 ends

FRUITLAND AVENUE STA. 72+79± TO STA. 74+07± STA. 76+19± TO STA. 77+89± ( N.T.S) FRUITLAND AVENUE STA. 77+89± TO STA. 91+67± ( N.T.S) FRUITLAND AVENUE STA. 91+67± TO STA. 95+91± ( N.T.S) FRUITLAND AVENUE STA. 95+91± TO STA. 98+69± ( N.T.S) FRUITLAND AVENUE STA. 98+69± TO STA. 101+16± ( N.T.S) FRUITLAND AVENUE STA. 101+16± TO STA. 104+90± ( N.T.S) FRUITLAND AVENUE STA. 104+90± TO STA. 106+70± ( N.T.S) FRUITLAND AVENUE STA. 67+20± TO STA. 71+39± ( N.T.S) FRUITLAND AVENUE STA. 74+07± TO STA. 76+19± ( N.T.S) Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT

STREET CROSS-SECTIONS
6

Page 226 of 282 ends

MATCH LINE
STA: 15+00.00

SEE SHEET BELOW
STA: 15+00.00

MATCH LINE

SEE SHEET ABOVE

MATCH LINE
STA: 20+50.00
SEE SHEET 8
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY & DEMOLITION PLAN 7 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUEKEY NOTES

ORCHARD PARK

NONPAREIL DRIVE

VILLAGE WOOD

DRIVE NN LEGEND DEMOLITION GENERAL NOTES

Page 227 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET
STA: 20+50.00
MATCH LINE7

MATCH LINE
STA: 31+50.00
SEE SHEET 9
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY & DEMOLITION PLAN 8 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE KANSAS
AVENUE

DAKOTA STREET

VIRGINIA STREET

VIRGINIA STREET N N LEGEND KEY NOTES DEMOLITION GENERAL NOTES

SEE SHEET BELOW

MATCH LINE
STA:26+00.00
STA:26+00.00

MATCH LINE

SEE SHEET ABOVE

Page 228 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET
STA: 31+50.00

MATCH LINE
8 MATCH LINE
STA: 42+50.00
SEE SHEET 10
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT

EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY & DEMOLITION PLAN
9 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE

SOWELL STREET

SOWELL STREET
N

N KEY NOTES LEGEND DEMOLITION GENERAL NOTES
STA:37+00.00

MATCH LINE

SEE SHEET ABOVE

MATCH LINE
STA:37+00.00

SEE SHEET BELOW

Page 229 of 282 ends

MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT MATCH LINE STA:54+00.00 SEE SHEET 11 SEE SHEET 9
STA: 42+50.00

MATCH LINE
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY & DEMOLITION PLAN 10 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE

N WINTON WAY

N WINTON WAY N N KEY NOTES LEGEND DEMOLITION GENERAL NOTES

Page 230 of 282 ends

MATCH LINE
STA: 65+00.00
SEE SHEET 12

SEE SHEET
STA: 54+00.00

MATCH LINE
10 Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY & DEMOLITION PLAN 11 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE N N LEGEND KEY NOTES DEMOLITION GENERAL NOTES MATCH LINE STA:59+50.00 SEE SHEET BELOW MATCH LINE STA:59+50.00 SEE SHEET ABOVE

Page 231 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET
STA: 65+00.00

MATCH LINE
11 MATCH LINE
STA: 76+00.00
SEE SHEET 13
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY & DEMOLITION PLAN 12 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE

FIFTH STREET

CHARDONNAY
WAY
N

N KEY NOTES DEMOLITION GENERAL NOTES LEGEND

MATCH LINE
STA:70+50.00

SEE SHEET BELOW
STA:70+50.00

MATCH LINE

SEE SHEET ABOVE

Page 232 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET
STA: 76+00.00

MATCH LINE
12 MATCH LINE
STA: 87+00.00
SEE SHEET 14
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY & DEMOLITION PLAN 13 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE

STRAWBERRY
COURT

LAURA LANE N N LEGEND KEY NOTES KEY NOTES DEMOLITION GENERAL NOTES

SEE SHEET BELOW

MATCH LINE
STA:81+50.00
STA:81+50.00

MATCH LINE

SEE SHEET ABOVE

Page 233 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET
STA: 87+00.00

MATCH LINE
13 MATCH LINE STA: 98+00.00 SEE SHEET 15
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY & DEMOLITION PLAN 14 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE

HEATHER GLEN

LANE (PRIVATE)

CAPITOLA AVENUE
N

N KEY NOTES DEMOLITION GENERAL NOTES LEGEND KEY NOTES

SEE SHEET BELOW

MATCH LINE
STA:92+50.00
STA:92+50.00

MATCH LINE

SEE SHEET ABOVE

Page 234 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET
STA: 98+00.00

MATCH LINE
14 MATCH LINE
STA: 103+50.00

SEE SHEET BELOW

MATCH LINE
STA: 103+50.00

SEE SHEET ABOVE
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY & DEMOLITION PLAN 15 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE SOQUEL
AVENUE

SHAFFER ROAD
N

N KEY NOTES DEMOLITION GENERAL NOTES LEGEND

Page 235 of 282 ends

ORCHARD PARK AVE NONPAREIL DRIVE INV AT INV AT LENGTH SIZE SLOPE ===== "LF 143.25 143.19 .0100 126 CB W1 MH W1 W1

MATCH LINE
STA: 15+00.00
SEE SHEET 17 W2
148.1
147.50
147.8
147.63
147.7
147.75
147.7
147.88
147.9
148.00
148.0
148.13
148.2
148.25
148.3
148.38
148.4
148.51
148.4
148.63
148.6
148.64
148.8 FLOWLINE CURVE TABLE CURVE C1 DELTA 91°01'05" ARC LENGTH 39.79 RADIUS 25.04 Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT

PLAN AND PROFILE
STA: 10+00.00 TO 15+00.00 16 N FRUITLAND AVENUE STA: 10+00.00 TO 15+00.00 PROFILE SCALE 1" = 20' HORIZONTAL 1" = 2' VERTICAL KEY NOTES 10 11 12 13 14 15 154 152 150 148 146 144 142 140 154 152 150 148 146 144 142 140

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 17

Page 236 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET 16
STA: 15+00.00

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE
STA: 20+50.00
SEE SHEET 18 NONPAREIL DRIVE VILLAGE WOODS DRIVE W3 W5 W4 C2 C3 C4 INV AT INV AT LENGTH SIZE SLOPE ===== "LF 143.27 143.21 .0100 126 CB-W2 MH-W3 148.63
148.6
148.64
148.8
148.60
148.9
148.73
148.9
148.87
149.0
149.1
148.74
149.3
148.75
148.92
149.4
149.14
149.6
149.39
149.8
150.1
149.52
149.97
150.3 FLOWLINE CURVE TABLE CURVE C2 C3 C4 DELTA 88°59'27" 90°58'41" 88°55'17" ARC LENGTH 38.83 39.70 38.80 RADIUS 25.00 25.00 25.00 Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT

PLAN AND PROFILE
STA. 15+00.00 TO 20+50.00 17 N FRUITLAND AVENUE STA. 15+00.00 TO 20+50.00 PROFILE SCALE 1" = 20' HORIZONTAL 1" = 2' VERTICAL KEY NOTES 15 16 17 18 19 20

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 16148 146 144 142 140 138 136 134 132

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 18 148 146 144 142 140 138 136 134 132

Page 237 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET 17
STA: 20+50.00

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE
STA: 26+00.00
SEE SHEET 19 KANSAS AVENUE
150.3
149.97
150.5
150.17
150.7
150.43
150.9
150.75
151.04
151.2
151.32
151.6
151.8
151.53
152.1
151.85
152.4
152.19
152.40
152.5
152.6
152.46
152.5
152.38 FLOWLINE CURVE TABLE CURVE C5 C6 DELTA 91°44'19" 88°53'24" ARC LENGTH 40.03 38.98 RADIUS 25.00 25.12 Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT

PLAN AND PROFILE
STA: 20+50.00 TO 26+00.00 18 N FRUITLAND AVENUE STA: 20+50.00 TO 26+00.00 PROFILE SCALE 1" = 20' HORIZONTAL 1" = 2' VERTICAL KEY NOTES 21 22 23 24 25 26

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 17 150 148 146 144 142 140 138 136 134

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 19 150 148 146 144 142 140 138 136 134 152 152

Page 238 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET 18
STA: 26+00.00

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE
STA: 31+50.00
SEE SHEET 20 DAKOTA STREET VIRGINIA STREET VIRGINIA STREET 152.38
152.5
152.27
152.4
152.2
152.15
152.03
152.0
151.92
151.9
151.81
151.9
151.70
151.9
151.65
151.9
151.68
152.0
151.73
152.0
152.1
151.80
151.87
152.3 FLOWLINE CURVE TABLE CURVE DELTA ARC LENGTH RADIUS Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT

PLAN AND PROFILE
STA: 26+00.00 TO 31+50.00 19 N FRUITLAND AVENUE STA: 26+00.00 TO 31+50.00 PROFILE SCALE 1" = 20' HORIZONTAL 1" = 2' VERTICAL KEY NOTES 26 27 28 29 30 31

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 18 154 152 150 148 146 144 142 140 138

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 20 154 152 150 148 146 144 142 140 138

Page 239 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET 19
STA: 31+50.00

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE
STA: 36+75.00
SEE SHEET 21

SOWELL STREET
152.3
151.87
152.4
151.96
152.6
152.17
152.6
152.29
153.0
152.43
153.2
152.57
153.2
152.67
153.2
152.77
153.2
152.86
153.3
152.94
153.08
153.5
153.7
153.15
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT

PLAN AND PROFILE
STA: 31+50.00 TO 36+75.00 20 N FRUITLAND AVENUE STA: 31+50.00 TO 36+75.00 PROFILE SCALE 1" = 20' HORIZONTAL 1" = 2' VERTICAL KEY NOTES 32 33 34 35 36 37

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 19 156 154 152 150 148 146 144 142 140 156 154 152 150 148 146 144 142 140

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 21

Page 240 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET 20
STA: 36+75.00

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE
STA: 42+50.00
SEE SHEET 22 SOWELL STREET
153.08
153.5
153.7
153.15
153.9
153.23
153.9
153.33
154.0
153.43
153.52
154.0
153.61
154.1
154.2
153.76
154.4
153.95
154.6
154.07
154.6
154.18
154.6
154.33
154.8
154.54
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT

PLAN AND PROFILE
STA: 36+75.00 TO 42+50.00 21 N FRUITLAND AVENUE STA: 36+75.00 TO 42+50.00 PROFILE SCALE 1" = 20' HORIZONTAL 1" = 2' VERTICAL KEY NOTES 37 38 39 40 41 42

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 20 156 154 152 150 148 146 144 142 140

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 22 158 156 154 152 150 148 146 144 142 140 158

Page 241 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET 21
STA: 42+50.00
MATCH LINE N. WINTON WAY N. WINTON WAY
154.07
154.6
154.18
154.6
154.33
154.6
154.54
154.8
155.1
154.76
155.24
155.5
155.79
156.0
156.51
156.6
157.23
157.3
158.3
158.1
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT

PLAN AND PROFILE
STA: 42+50.00 TO 45+69.42 22 N FRUITLAND AVENUE STA: 42+50.00 TO 45+69.42 PROFILE SCALE 1" = 20' HORIZONTAL 1" = 2' VERTICAL KEY NOTES 42 43 44 45

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 21 160 158 156 154 152 150 148 146 144 160 158 156 154 152 150 148 146 144

Page 242 of 282 ends

MATCH LINE STA: 55+00.00 SEE SHEET 24
N. WINTON WAY E19 18 INV AT INV AT LENGTH SIZE SLOPE ===== "LF 152.17 152.08 .0065 12 14 CB-E23 MH-E19 INV AT INV AT LENGTH SIZE SLOPE ===== "LF 152.17 152.08 .0050 12 19 CB-E24 MH-E19 FLOWLINE CURVE TABLE CURVE DELTA ARC LENGTH RADIUS 159.0
158.0
157.56
157.4
157.23
157.2
157.02
156.9
156.88
156.8
156.72
156.6
156.56
156.5
156.59
156.6
156.95
157.0
156.76
156.8
156.52
156.6
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT

PLAN AND PROFILE
STA: 50+00.00 TO 55+00.00 23 N FRUITLAND AVENUE STA: 50+00.00 TO 55+00.00 PROFILE SCALE 1" = 20' HORIZONTAL 1" = 2' VERTICAL KEY NOTES 52 53 54 55 160 158 156 154 152 150 148 146

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 24 51 160 158 156 154 152 150 148 146 50

Page 243 of 282 ends

STA: 55+00.00 MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 23
MATCH LINE STA: 60+50.00 SEE SHEET 25
S
FRUITLAND AVE FLOWLINE CURVE TABLE CURVE C13 C14 DELTA 58°47'19" 58°47'19" ARC LENGTH 166.22 133.39 RADIUS 162.00 130.00 156.95
157.0
156.76
156.8
156.52
156.6
156.28
156.4
156.1
156.04
156.13
156.2
156.26
156.3
156.38
156.5
156.51
156.5
156.45
156.5
156.31
156.4
156.47
156.4
157.1
157.16
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT

PLAN AND PROFILE
STA: 55+00.00 TO 60+50.00 24 N FRUITLAND AVENUE STA: 55+00.00 TO 60+50.00 PROFILE SCALE 1" = 20' HORIZONTAL 1" = 2' VERTICAL KEY NOTES 55 56 57 58 59 60

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 23 158 156 154 152 150 148 146 144

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 25 158 156 154 152 150 148 146 144

Page 244 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET 24
STA: 60+50.00

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE
STA: 66+00.00
SEE SHEET 26 W W W S S W S S S W W
156.4
157.1
157.16
157.1
157.22
157.2
157.10
157.3
157.06
157.26
157.5
157.7
157.45
157.8
157.55
157.62
157.8
157.8
157.69
157.8
157.76
157.9
157.83
158.0
157.89
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT

PLAN AND PROFILE
STA: 60+50.00 TO 66+00.00 25 N FRUITLAND AVENUE STA: 60+50.00 TO 66+00.00 PROFILE SCALE 1" = 20' HORIZONTAL 1" = 2' VERTICAL KEY NOTES 61 62 63 64 65 66

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 24 162 160 158 156 154 152 150 148 146

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 26 162 160 158 156 154 152 150 148 146

Page 245 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET 25
STA: 66+00.00

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE
STA: 71+50.00
SEE SHEET 27 FIFTH STREET W W W W W S S S S S
157.9
157.89
158.0
157.96
158.0
158.03
158.0
158.1
158.10
158.1
158.17
158.24
158.2
158.31
158.4
158.37
158.7
158.52
158.9
159.1
158.67
159.04
159.5
159.60
160.0
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT

PLAN AND PROFILE
STA: 66+00.00 TO 71+50.00 26 N FRUITLAND AVENUE STA: 66+00.00 TO 71+50.00 PROFILE SCALE 1" = 20' HORIZONTAL 1" = 2' VERTICAL 66 67 68 69 70 71

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 25 160 158 156 154 152 150 148 146 144

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 27 160 158 156 154 152 150 148 146 144 KEY NOTES

Page 246 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET 26
STA: 71+50.00

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE
STA: 77+00.00
SEE SHEET 28 CHARDONNAY WAY W W S W S S S S FLOWLINE CURVE TABLE CURVE C22 C23 C24 C25 C26 DELTA 89°04'42" 90°53'58" 26°56'25" 26°56'25" 26°56'25" ARC LENGTH 46.64 47.59 4.70 4.70 2.35 RADIUS 30.00 30.00 10.00 10.00 5.00 159.5
159.60
160.0
159.88
160.3
160.04
160.5
160.22
160.7
161.1
160.44
160.66
161.3
161.02
161.6
161.41
161.7
161.79
161.9
162.17
162.3
162.25
162.4
162.1
162.14
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT

PLAN AND PROFILE
STA: 71+50.00 TO 77+00.00 27 N FRUITLAND AVENUE STA: 71+50.00 TO 77+00.00 PROFILE SCALE 1" = 20' HORIZONTAL 1" = 2' VERTICAL KEY NOTES 72 73 74 75 76 77

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 26

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 28162 160 158 156 154 152 150 148 KEY NOTES (CON'T) 162 160 158 156 154 152 150 148

Page 247 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET 27
STA: 77+00.00

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE
STA: 82+25.00
SEE SHEET 29 STRAWBERRY STREET INV AT INV AT LENGTH SIZE SLOPE ===== "LF 154.47 154.42 .0100 125 CB-E9 MH-E8 S W S S W W W W E9 E8FLOWLINE CURVE TABLE CURVE DELTA ARC LENGTH RADIUS 162.4
162.1
162.14
161.87
161.9
161.54
161.6
161.24
161.2
160.92
160.9
160.59
160.6
160.18
160.2
159.78
159.8
159.53
159.5
159.29
159.3
159.06
159.0
158.94
158.9
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT

PLAN AND PROFILE
STA: 77+00.00 TO 82+25.00 28 N FRUITLAND AVENUE STA: 77+00.00 TO 82+25.00 PROFILE SCALE 1" = 20' HORIZONTAL 1" = 2' VERTICAL 77 78 79 80 81 82

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 24162 160 158 156 154 152 150 148

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 29 162 160 158 156 154 152 150 148 KEY NOTES KEY NOTES, (CON'T)

Page 248 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET 28
STA: 82+25.00

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE
STA: 88+00.00
SEE SHEET 30 LAURA LANE HEATHER GLEN LANE S W S W W S W FLOWLINE CURVE TABLE CURVE DELTA ARC LENGTH RADIUS 159.06
159.0
158.94
158.9
158.81
158.8
158.69
158.7
158.58
158.6
158.67
158.7
158.71
158.7
158.61
158.5
158.51
158.5
158.57
158.6
158.67
158.7
158.77
158.7
158.87
158.7
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT

PLAN AND PROFILE
STA: 82+25.00 TO 88+00.00 29 N FRUITLAND AVENUE STA: 82+25.00 TO 88+00.00 PROFILE SCALE 1" = 20' HORIZONTAL 1" = 2' VERTICAL KEY NOTES 83 84 85 86 87

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 28 162 160 158 156 154 152 150 148

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 30 162 160 158 156 154 152 150 148 88 KEY NOTES, (CON'T)

Page 249 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET 29
STA: 88+00.00

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE
STA: 93+50.00
SEE SHEET 31 W W S W CAPITOLA AVENUE
158.7
158.87
158.7
158.97
158.8
159.14
158.8
159.31
159.0
159.47
159.2
159.64
159.4
159.81
159.7
159.99
160.0
160.36
160.3
160.73
160.6
161.10
161.0
161.47
161.4
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT

PLAN AND PROFILE
STA: 88+00.00 TO 93+50.00 30 N FRUITLAND AVENUE STA: 88+00.00 TO 93+50.00 PROFILE SCALE 1" = 20' HORIZONTAL 1" = 2' VERTICAL KEY NOTES 88 89 90 91 92 93

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 29 164. 162 160 158 156 154 152 150

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 31 164. 162 160 158 156 154 152 150 KEY NOTES (CON'T)

Page 250 of 282 ends

MATCH LINE STA: 93+50.00 SEE SHEET 30
MATCH LINE STA: 99+00.00 SEE SHEET 32
S W
W

W FLOWLINE CURVE TABLE CURVE DELTA ARC LENGTH RADIUS
161.0
161.47
161.4
161.84
161.8
162.27
162.2
162.70
162.6
163.14
163.2
163.07
162.9
162.88
163.0
162.89
162.9
163.1
163.06
163.24
163.2
163.30
163.2
163.1
163.27
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT

PLAN AND PROFILE
STA: 93+50.00 TO 99+00.00 31 N FRUITLAND AVENUE STA: 93+50.00 TO 99+00.00 PROFILE SCALE 1" = 20' HORIZONTAL 1" = 2' VERTICAL KEY NOTES 99 94 95 96 97 98

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 30 166 164 162 160 158 156 154 152 166 164 162 160 158 156 154 152

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 32

KEY NOTES (CON'T)

Page 251 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET 31
STA: 99+00.00

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE
STA: 104+50.00
SEE SHEET 33 SOQUEL AVENUE LOS ALTOS COURT FLOWLINE CURVE TABLE CURVE DELTA ARC LENGTH RADIUS 163.1
163.27
163.28
163.2
163.1
163.24
162.98
162.8
162.80
162.6
162.62
162.4
162.47
162.3
162.39
162.2
162.1
162.32
162.33
162.2
162.47
162.3
162.61
162.4
162.75
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT

PLAN AND PROFILE
STA: 99+00.00 TO 104+50.00 32 N FRUITLAND AVENUE STA: 99+00.00 TO 104+50.00 PROFILE SCALE 1" = 20' HORIZONTAL 1" = 2' VERTICAL KEY NOTES 99 100 101 102 103 104

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 31 164 162 160 158 156 154 152 150 148 164 162 160 158 156 154 152 150 148

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 33

Page 252 of 282 ends

STA: 104+50.00 MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 32 SHAFFER ROAD SHAFFER ROAD FLOWLINE CURVE TABLE CURVE DELTA ARC LENGTH RADIUS 162.33
162.2
162.47
162.3
162.61
162.4
162.75
162.6
162.87
162.7
163.11
162.9
163.80
163.6
164.86
164.8
165.4
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT

PLAN AND PROFILE
STA: 104+50.00 TO 107+34.56 33 N FRUITLAND AVENUE STA: 104+50.00 TO 107+34.56 PROFILE SCALE 1" = 20' HORIZONTAL 1" = 2' VERTICAL KEY NOTES 104 105 106 107 108 109 166 164 162 160 158 156 154 152

MATCH LINE
SEE SHEET 32 166 164 162 160 158 156 154 152

Page 253 of 282 ends

MATCH LINE
STA: 15+00.00

SEE SHEET BELOW
STA: 15+00.00

MATCH LINE

SEE SHEET ABOVE

MATCH LINE
STA: 20+50.00
SEE SHEET 35
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
STRIPING & SIGNAGE PLAN 34 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE

ORCHARD PARK

NONPAREIL DRIVE

VILLAGE WOODS

DRIVE NN STRIPING GENERAL NOTES LEGEND (APPLIES TO ALL STRIPING & SIGNAGE PLAN SHEETS)

Page 254 of 282 ends

MATCH LINE
STA: 26+00.00

SEE SHEET BELOW

SEE SHEET
STA: 20+50.00

MATCH LINE
34 MATCH LINE
STA: 31+50.00
SEE SHEET 36
STA: 26+00.00

MATCH LINE

SEE SHEET ABOVE
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
STRIPING & SIGNAGE PLAN 35 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE KANSAS
AVENUE

DAKOTA STREET

VIRGINIA STREET

VIRGINIA STREET
N

N KEY NOTES

Page 255 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET
STA: 31+50.00

MATCH LINE
35 MATCH LINE
STA: 37+00.00

SEE SHEET BELOW

MATCH LINE
STA: 42+50.00
SEE SHEET 37
STA: 37+00.00

MATCH LINE

SEE SHEET ABOVE
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
STRIPING & SIGNAGE PLAN 36 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE

SOWELL STREET

SOWELL STREET
N

N KEY NOTES

Page 256 of 282 ends

MATCH LINE STA: 54+00.00 SEE SHEET 38 MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT

SEE SHEET
STA: 42+50.00

MATCH LINE
36 Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
STRIPING & SIGNAGE PLAN 37 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE

N WINTON WAY

N WINTON WAY N N KEY NOTES

Page 257 of 282 ends

MATCH LINE
STA: 65+00.00
SEE SHEET 39
MATCH LINE STA: 59+50.00 SEE SHEET ABOVE

SEE SHEET
STA: 54+00.00

MATCH LINE
37 MATCH LINE STA: 59+50.00 SEE SHEET BELOW
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
STRIPING & SIGNAGE PLAN 38 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE N N

Page 258 of 282 ends

MATCH LINE
STA: 70+50.00

SEE SHEET BELOW

SEE SHEET
STA: 65+00.00

MATCH LINE
38 STA: 70+50.00

MATCH LINE

SEE SHEET ABOVE

MATCH LINE
STA: 76+00.00
SEE SHEET 40
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
STRIPING & SIGNAGE PLAN 39 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE

FIFTH STREET

CHARDONNAY
WAY
N

N KEY NOTES

Page 259 of 282 ends

MATCH LINE
STA: 81+50.00

SEE SHEET BELOW

SEE SHEET
STA: 76+00.00

MATCH LINE
39 S
S
STA: 81+50.00

MATCH LINE

SEE SHEET ABOVE

MATCH LINE
STA: 87+00.00
SEE SHEET 41
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
STRIPING & SIGNAGE PLAN 40 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE

STRAWBERRY
COURT

LAURA LANE
N
N

Page 260 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET
STA: 87+00.00

MATCH LINE
40 MATCH LINE
STA: 92+50.00

SEE SHEET BELOW S
STA: 92+50.00

MATCH LINE

SEE SHEET ABOVE
MATCH LINE STA: 98+00.00 SEE SHEET ## S S
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
STRIPING & SIGNAGE PLAN 41 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE

HEATHER GLEN

LANE (PRIVATE)

CAPITOLA AVENUEN N KEY NOTES

Page 261 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET 38
STA: 98+00.00

MATCH LINE

MATCH LINE
STA: 103+50.00

SEE SHEET BELOW

MATCH LINE
STA: 103+50.00

SEE SHEET ABOVE
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
STRIPING & SIGNAGE PLAN 42 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE SOQUEL
AVENUE

SHAFFER ROAD
N
N

Page 262 of 282 ends

TYPICAL FRENCH DRAIN DETAIL (NTS) TYPICAL FRENCH DRAIN SECTION (NTS) COMBINATION INLET ROUND INLET TYPICAL INLET FILTER INSTALLATION (NTS) TRAFFIC CALMING FEATURE: MID-BLOCK CHOKER SCALE: 1"=10' TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY DETAIL NOT TO SCALE SECTION PLAN DAKOTA STREET DAKOTA STREET FRENCH DRAIN DETAIL NOT TO SCALE WEIR MANHOLE DETAIL TYPICAL DEPRESSED SIDEWALK DRIVEWAY DETAIL NOT TO SCALE Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 43 N

Page 263 of 282 ends

Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
TYPICAL TRAFFIC CIRCLE DETAILS 44
N
1 TYPICAL TRAFFIC CIRCLE LAYOUT AS NOTED RE:26, 29 & 30 A TRAFFIC CIRCLE CROSS-SECTION AS NOTED RE:26, 29 & 30
2 MOUNTABLE CURB NTS RE:44
3 SPLITTER ISLAND CURB NTS RE:44

Page 264 of 282 ends

FIFTH STREET FRUITLAND AVENUE FIFTH STREET FRUITLAND AVENUE SEGMENT TABLE SEGMENT TABLE Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
FIFTH STREET INTERSECTION DETAILS 45 FIFTH STREET INTERSECTION GRADING DETAIL

N FIFTH STREET INTERSECTION LAYOUT DETAIL

Page 265 of 282 ends

SEGMENT TABLE
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
CHARDONNAY WAY INTERSECTION DETAILS 46 CHARDONNAY WAY INTERSECTION GRADING DETAIL N CHARDONNAY WAY INTERSECTION LAYOUT DETAIL

Page 266 of 282 ends

LAURA LANE

LANE FRUITLAND AVENUE

LAURA LANE

LANE FRUITLAND AVENUE SEGMENT TABLE SEGMENT TABLE
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
LAURA LANE INTERSECTION DETAILS 47 LAURA LANE INTERSECTION GRADING DETAIL

N LAURA LANE INTERSECTION LAYOUT DETAIL

Page 267 of 282 ends

FRUITLAND AVENUE CAPITOLA AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE CAPITOLA AVENUE SEGMENT TABLE SEGMENT TABLE Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
CAPITOLA AVENUE INTERSECTION DETAILS 48 CAPITOLA AVENUE INTERSECTION GRADING DETAIL

N CAPITOLA AVENUE INTERSECTION LAYOUT DETAIL

Page 268 of 282 ends

HP
FRUITLAND AVENUE MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT ATWATER CANAL 150 155 146 147 148 149 151 152 153 154 156 157 150
155
146
147
148
149
151
152
153
154
156 150 155 146 147 148 149 151 152 153 154 156 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153
154
155 156 N STAGE-STORAGE TABLE TREATMENT AND STORAGE BASIN PLAN SECTION A: BASIN CROSS-SECTION SCALE: 1"=20' HORIZONTAL 1"=2' VERTICAL Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
STORM DRAIN BASIN DETAILS 49 Elevation Contour Area (sq. ft.) Depth (ft.) Inc. Volume (cu. ft.) Cumltve. Volume (cu. ft.) 145.5 15,139 N/A N/A 0 146.0 16,508 0.5 7,912 7,912 146.5 17,507 0.5 8,504 16,415 147.0 18,519 0.5 9,006 25,422 147.5 19,545 0.5 9,516 34,938 148.0 20,585 0.5 10,033 44,971 148.5 21,639 0.5 10,556 55,527 149.0 22,707 0.5 11,087 66,613 149.5 23,788 0.5 11,624 78,237 150.0 24,884 0.5 12,168 90,405 150.5 25,993 0.5 12,719 103,124 151.0 27,116 0.5 13,277 116,401 151.5 28,252 0.5 13,842 130,243 152.0 29,403 0.5 14,414 144,657 152.5 30,567 0.5 14,992 159,650 153.0 31,745 0.5 15,578 175,228 153.5 32,937 0.5 16,171 191,398 154.0 34,143 0.5 16,770 208,168 154.5 35,366 0.5 17,377 225,545 155.0 36,617 0.5 17,996 243,541 155.5 37,897 0.5 9,474 253,015 156.0 39,207 0.5 9,802 262,817 LEGEND

Page 269 of 282 ends

Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
STORM DRAIN BASIN DETAILS 50 1 TYPICAL BIORETENTION SECTION RE: 12" MAX. PONDING DEPTH OVERFLOW INLET. WELL-DRAINING BIO-RETENTION MIX 18" PER SPECIFICATIONS, THIS SHEET. 4" PERFORATED / SLOTTED UNDERDRAIN CONNECTED TO STORM DRAIN STRUCTURE DRAIN ROCK 2 BIORETENTION SOIL MIX SPECIFICATION RE: SOIL SPECIFICATIONS Bioretention soils shall meet the following criteria. “Applicant” refers to the entity proposing the soil mixture for approval by a Permittee. 1. General Requirements Bioretention soil shall achieve a long-term, in-place infiltration rate of at least 10 inches per hour. Bioretention soil shall also support vigorous plant growth. Bioretention Soil shall be a mixture of fine sand, and compost, measured on a volume basis: 60%-70% Sand 30%-40% Compost 1.1. Submittals The applicant must submit to the municipality for approval: A. A sample of mixed bioretention soil. B. Certification from the soil supplier or an accredited laboratory that the Bioretention Soil meets the requirements of this guideline specification.C. Grain size analysis results of the fine sand component performed in accordance with ASTM D 422, Standard Test Method for Particle Size Analysis of Soils. D. Quality analysis results for compost performed in accordance with Seal of Testing Assurance (STA) standards. E. Organic content test results of mixed Bioretention Soil. Organic content test shall be performed in accordance with Testing Methods for the Examination of Compost and Composting (TMECC) 05.07A, “Loss-On-Ignition Organic Matter Method”. F. Grain size analysis results of compost component performed in accordance with ASTM D 422, Standard Test Method for Particle Size Analysis of Soils. G. A description of the equipment and methods used to mix the sand and compost to produce Bioretention Soil. H. Provide the following information about the testing laboratory(ies) name of laboratory(ies) including 1) contact person(s) 2) address(es) 3) phone contact(s) 4) e-mail address(es) 5) qualifications of laboratory(ies), and personnel including date of current certification by STA, ASTM, or approved equal 1.2. Sand for Bioretention Soil A. General Sand shall be free of wood, waste, coating such as clay, stone dust, carbonate, etc., or any other deleterious material. All aggregate passing the No. 200 sieve size shall be non-plastic. B. Sand for Bioretention Soil Texture Sand for Bioretention Soils shall be analyzed by an accredited lab using #200, #100, #40, #30, #16. #8, #4, and 3/8 inch sieves (ASTM D 422 or as approved by the City of Stockton), and meet the following gradation: Sieve Size Percent Passing (by weight) Min Max 3/8 inch 100 100 No. 4 90 100 No. 8 70 100 No. 16 40 95 No. 30 15 70 No. 40 5 55 No. 100 0 15 No. 200 0 5 Note: all sands complying with ASTM C33 for fine aggregate comply with the above gradation requirements. 1.3. Composted Material Compost shall be a well decomposed, stable, weed free organic matter source derived from waste materials including yard debris, wood wastes or other organic materials not including manure or biosolids meeting the standards developed by the US Composting Council (USCC). The product shall be certified through the USCC Seal of Testing Assurance (STA) Program (a compost testing and information disclosure program). A. Compost Quality Analysis Before delivery of the soil, the supplier shall submit a copy of lab analysis performed by a laboratory that is enrolled in the US Composting Council’s Compost Analysis Proficiency (CAP) program and using approved Test Methods for the Evaluation of Composting and Compost (TMECC). The lab report shall verify: 1) Feedstock Materials shall be specified and include one or more of the following: landscape/yard trimmings, grass clippings, food scraps, and agricultural crop residues. 2) Organic Matter Content: 35% - 75% by dry wt. 3) Carbon and Nitrogen Ratio: C:N < 25:1 and C:N >15:1 4) Maturity/Stability: shall have a dark brown color and a soil-like odor. Compost exhibiting a sour or putrid smell, containing recognizable grass or leaves, or is hot (120F) upon delivery or rewetting is not acceptable. In addition any one of the following is required to indicate stability: a. Oxygen Test < 1.3 O2 /unit TS /hr b. Specific oxy. Test < 1.5 O2 / unit BVS / c. Respiration test < 8 C / unit VS / day d. Dewar test < 20 Temp. rise (°C) e. e. Solvita® > 5 Index value 5) Toxicity: any one of the following measures is sufficient to indicate non-toxicity.a. NH4- : NO3-N < 3 b. Ammonium < 500 ppm, dry basis c. Seed Germination > 80 % of control d. Plant Trials > 80% of control e. Solvita® > 5 Index value 6) Nutrient Content: provide analysis detailing nutrient content including N-P-K, Ca, Na, Mg, S, and B. a. Total Nitrogen content 0.9% or above preferred. b. Boron: Total shall be <80 ppm; Soluble shall be <2.5 ppm 7) Salinity: Must be reported; < 6.0 mmhos/cm 8) pH shall be between 6.5 and 8. May vary with plant species. B. Compost for Bioretention Soil Texture Compost for Bioretention Soils shall be analyzed by an accredited lab using #200, 1/4 inch, 1/2 inch, and 1 inch sieves (ASTM D 422 or as approved by the City of Stockton), and meet the following gradation: Sieve Size Percent Passing (by weight) Min Max 1 inch 99 100 1/2 inch 90 100 1/4 inch 40 90 No. 200 2 10 C. Bulk density: shall be between 500 and 1100 dry lbs/cubic yard D. Moisture Content shall be between 30% - 55% of dry solids. E. Inerts: compost shall be relatively free of inert ingredients, including glass, plastic and paper, < 1 % by weight or volume. F. Weed seed/pathogen destruction: provide proof of process to further reduce pathogens (PFRP). For example, turned windrows must reach min. 55C for 15 days with at least 5 turnings during that period. G. Select Pathogens: Salmonella <3 MPN/4grams of TS, or Coliform Bacteria <10000 MPN/gram. H. Trace Contaminants Metals (Lead, Mercury, Etc.) Product must meet US EPA, 40 CFR 503 regulations. I. Compost Testing The compost supplier will test all compost products within 120 calendar days prior to application. Samples will be taken using the STA sample collection protocol. (The sample collection protocol can be obtained from the U.S. Composting Council, 4250 Veterans Memorial Highway, Suite 275, Holbrook, NY 11741 Phone: 631-737-4931, www.compostingcouncil.org). The sample shall be sent to an independent STA Program approved lab. The compost supplier will pay for the test. 8" MIN. 2"-4" ABOVE SUBDRAIN NOTES: 1 UNDERDRAIN PIPE SHALL BE PERFORATED OR SLOTTED PVC CONFORMING TO ASTM D1785, SCH 40. PERFORATED/SLOTTED HDPE CONFORMING TO ASTM F405 AND F606 MAY ALSO BE USED. 2 DRAIN ROCK SHALL BE CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL PER CALTRANS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 68-2.02 F(3). 7 GA. TENSION WIRE 1.66" O.D. 2.27#/FT. BRACE TYPICAL 9 GA. CHAIN LINK FABRIC ON INSIDE - 7 GAUGE COIL SPRING BOTTOM TENSION WIRE. - CHAIN LINK WIRE, STD. 9 GAUGE WOVEN MESH POSTS TO BE SPACED AT 10' CENTERS. POSTS TO BE PLACED IN 36" x 8" DIAMETER HOLES (WITH CONCRETE). - CORNER POST TO BE 2.875" O.D. - TOP RAIL TO BE 1.5" O.D. GATE POST TO BE 2.875" O.D. LINE POST TO BE 1.875" O.D. ALL POSTS AND RAILS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40. 2'-6" FOR FABRIC LESS THAN 60" HIGH
3'-0" FOR FABRIC 60" & OVER
6"
3"
7'-0"
7'-3" MIN.
12" 9"

3.65#/FT. TYPICAL
10'-0" TYPICAL
SECTION OF POST WITH MIN. OF 8" NOT LESS THAN 3 TIMES MAX. CROSS LINE POSTS @ 500' MAX. INTERVALS ALONG BOTTOM OF FENCE BRACED & TRUSSED BOTH WAYS 7 GA. TENSION WIRE 10'-0" TYPICAL THE CHAIN LINK FENCE AND LINE POSTS, 1.9" O.D. 2.72#/FT. 9" 12" 3' 3"
4" A.B. @ 95% RELATIVE COMPACTION 3" WIRE NOTES: FABRIC POST RAIL 6'-3" MIN.
6'-0" * 7 GA. TENSION WIRE FENCE & GATE DETAIL 9 GA. CHAIN LINK FABRIC ON INSIDE LINK FABRIC ON INSIDE 9 GA. CHAIN 12' 6' TURNBUCKLE 3/8" TRUSS ROD TYPICAL 1.66" O.D. 2.27#/ft. BRACE TYPICAL GATE FRAME TO BE 1.5" O.D. NOT LESS THAN 3 TIMES MAX. CROSS SECTION OF POST WITH MIN. OF 8" STANDARD PIPE PUMPSITE NO.1 WILL BE 4' IN HEIGHT GATE SURROUNDING THE WETWELL ON AND WILL NOT HAVE BARB WIRE. *NOTE: POST WITH MIN. OF 8" MAX. CROSS SECTION OF NOT LESS THAN 3 TIMES POST DETAIL IN BOTH DIRECTIONS CHAIN LINK FENCE DETAIL LINE POSTS AT 500' MAXIMUM INTERVALS BRACED AND TRUSSED9 GA. CHAIN LINK FABRIC ON INSIDE 2.27#/FT. BRACE 1.66" O.D. & TURNBUCKLE CORNER DETAIL 5.79#/FT. 3/8" TRUSS ROD TERMINAL AND CORNER POSTS 2.875' O.D. GATE POSTS TO BE 2.875" O.D. 5.79#/FT. MIN. SIZE TO BE DETERMINED BY WIDTH OF GATE. 3' 3' 2 TYPICAL SLOPE STABILIZATION DETAIL RE: 12X12 ANCHOR TRENCH. RE-FILL WITH COMPACTED SOIL. 12X12 ANCHOR TRENCH. RE-FILL WITH COMPACTED SOIL. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ALONG ALL SIDE SLOPES. INSTALL HYDRO SEED BOTH ABOVE AND BELOW BLANKET. INSTALL ANCHOR PINS PER MANUFACTURE RECOMMENDATIONS. TOP OF SLOPE TOE OF SLOPE

Page 270 of 282 ends

Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
STANDARD DETAILS 51 1 CURB RAMP DETAILS - CALTRANS STANDARD RDP A88A N.T.S. 2 CURBS & DRIVEWAY DETAILS - CALTRANS STANDARD A87A N.T.S. 3 DRAINAGE INLET DETAILS - CALTRANS STANDARD RSP D73E N.T.S. 4 CONCRETE PIPE INLETS DETAILS - CALTRANS STANDARD D75B N.T.S.

Page 271 of 282 ends

Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
STANDARD DETAILS 52

Page 272 of 282 ends

MATCH LINE
STA: 15+00.00

SEE SHEET BELOW
STA: 15+00.00

MATCH LINE

SEE SHEET ABOVE

MATCH LINE
STA: 20+50.00
SEE SHEET 54
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 53 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE

ORCHARD PARK

NONPAREIL DRIVE

VILLAGE WOODS
DRIVE N N EROSION CONTROL LEGEND EROSION CONTROL NOTES WDID#: TBD KEY NOTES

Page 273 of 282 ends

MATCH LINE
STA: 26+00.00

SEE SHEET BELOW

SEE SHEET
STA: 20+50.00

MATCH LINE
53 MATCH LINE
STA: 31+50.00
SEE SHEET 55
STA: 26+00.00

MATCH LINE

SEE SHEET ABOVE
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 54 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE KANSAS
AVENUE
DAKOTA
STREET

VIRGINIA
STREET

VIRGINIA
STREET
N

N KEY NOTES KEY NOTES

Page 274 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET
STA: 31+50.00

MATCH LINE
54 MATCH LINE
STA: 37+00.00

SEE SHEET BELOW

MATCH LINE
STA: 42+50.00
SEE SHEET 56
STA: 37+00.00

MATCH LINE

SEE SHEET ABOVE
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 55 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE

SOWELL STREET

SOWELL STREET
N

N KEY NOTES KEY NOTES

Page 275 of 282 ends

MATCH LINE
STA: 54+00.00 SEE SHEET 57 MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT
HP

SEE SHEET
STA: 42+50.00

MATCH LINE
55 Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 56 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE

N WINTON WAY

N WINTON WAY
N

N KEY NOTES KEY NOTES

Page 276 of 282 ends

MATCH LINE
STA: 65+00.00
SEE SHEET 58

MATCH LINE
STA: 59+50.00 SEE SHEET ABOVE
HP
HP
GB

SEE SHEET
STA: 54+00.00

MATCH LINE
56 MATCH LINE
STA: 59+50.00 SEE SHEET BELOW
HP
HP
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 57 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE N

N KEY NOTES KEY NOTES

Page 277 of 282 ends

MATCH LINE
STA: 70+50.00

SEE SHEET BELOW

SEE SHEET
STA: 65+00.00

MATCH LINE
57 GB
GB
STA: 70+50.00

MATCH LINE

SEE SHEET ABOVE

MATCH LINE
STA: 76+00.00
SEE SHEET 59
GB
GB
GB
HP
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 58 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE

FIFTH STREET

CHARDONNAY
WAY
N

N KEY NOTES KEY NOTES

Page 278 of 282 ends

MATCH LINE
STA: 81+50.00

SEE SHEET BELOW

SEE SHEET
STA: 76+00.00

MATCH LINE
58 HP
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
STA: 81+50.00

MATCH LINE

SEE SHEET ABOVE

MATCH LINE
STA: 87+00.00
SEE SHEET 60
GB
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 59 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE

STRAWBERRY
COURT

LAURA LANE
N

N KEY NOTES KEY NOTES

Page 279 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET
STA: 87+00.00

MATCH LINE
59 MATCH LINE
STA: 92+50.00

SEE SHEET BELOW
W
W
S
STA: 92+50.00

MATCH LINE

SEE SHEET ABOVE

MATCH LINE
STA: 98+00.00 SEE SHEET 61
S
S
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 60 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE

HEATHER GLEN

LANE (PRIVATE)

CAPITOLA
AVENUE
N

N KEY NOTES KEY NOTES

Page 280 of 282 ends

SEE SHEET
STA: 87+00.00

MATCH LINE
60 MATCH LINE
STA: 92+50.00

SEE SHEET BELOW
STA: 92+50.00

MATCH LINE

SEE SHEET ABOVE
Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 61 FRUITLAND AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE SOQUEL
AVENUE

SHAFFER ROAD
N

N KEY NOTES KEY NOTES

Page 281 of 282 ends

Revision
Engineer's Seal Client/Project
Title Sheet No. of
CITY OF ATWATER 62
ATWATER, CALIFORNIA sheets

FRUITLAND AVENUE

ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS 62 5 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS AND TIRE WASH RE: 53-61 3 SILTSACK RE: 53-61 1 MATERIALS STOCKPILE DETAIL RE: 53-61 4 CONCRETE WASH OUT RE: 53-61 6 STORM INLET PROTECTION (GRAVEL BAG BERM) RE: 53-61 2 FIBER ROLL INSTALLATION RE: 53-61 7 STORM INLET PROTECTION (TYPE 2) RE: 53-61

Page 282 of 282 ends

Atwater City CouncilJanuary 22, 2024

Atwater City Council
January 22, 2024