HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
AGENDA
SPECIAL MEETING
October 22, 2025, 11:00 a.m.
City Hall North Conference Room A
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Committee Members:
Manpreet Kaur
Bob Smith
Larry Koman
1. ROLL CALL
2. PUBLIC STATEMENTS
a. Agenda Item Public Statements
b. Non-Agenda Item Public Statements
3. ADOPTION OF MINUTES
a. Adoption of August 7, 2025 Regular Meeting Minutes
Staff Recommends adoption of minutes.
4. REPORTS
a. Update of Chronic Nuisance Property and Vacant Building Registry Staff recommends the Committee discuss and receive and file the report.
5. DEFERRED BUSINESS
a. Short Term Rental Update and Direction
The Committee will receive an update on the Short-Term Rentals and the concept to draft an ordinance to bring later to identify how to manage the Short-Term Rentals already happening throughout the City.
Provide staff direction on whether to bring a Short-Term Rental Ordinance to City Council to manage these units throughout the City.
6. NEW BUSINESS
7. COMMITTEE COMMENTS
8. ADJOURNMENT
1 HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
August 7, 2025, 12:00 p.m.
City Hall North Conference Room A
1600 Truxtun Avenue
Members Present: Bob Smith, Larry Koman
Members Absent: Manpreet Kaur
Staff Present: Viridiana Gallardo-King, Deputy City Attorney, Phil Burns, Julie Drimakis, City Clerk
_____________________________________________________________________
1. ROLL CALL
Meeting called to order at 12:10 p.m.
2. PUBLIC STATEMENTS
a. Agenda Item Public Statements
None.
b. Non-Agenda Item Public Statements
None.
3. ADOPTION OF MINUTES
a. Adoption of June 12, 2025, Regular Meeting Minutes.
Moved by: Larry Koman
Staff Recommends adoption of minutes.
Approved
4. REPORTS
5. DEFERRED BUSINESS
6. NEW BUSINESS
a. Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Forgivable Loan Program
2 Juan Heredia, City Manager's Office, made staff comments and provided a PowerPoint presentation.
Moved by: Larry Koman
Staff recommend Committee receive, file, and approve draft guidelines.
Approved
1. Blue Memo
2. PowerPoint presentation
7. COMMITTEE COMMENTS
8. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting was adjourned at 1:06 p.m.
_________________________
MANPREET KAUR, CHAIR
_________________________
JULIE DRIMAKIS, CITY CLERK
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: October 22, 2025 AGENDA CATEGORY: Report TO: Housing and Community Development Committee
FROM: Phillip Burns, Development Services Director
DATE: October 16, 2025
SUBJECT: Update of Chronic Nuisance Property Program and Vacant Building Registry
[Document Description]
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Committee discuss and receive and file the report.
BACKGROUND:
Before the implementation of the Chronic Vacant Nuisance Building and Vacant Building Registry programs, the City frequently faced structure fires at unsecured or poorly maintained vacant buildings.
These properties often attracted trespassing and homeless activity, resulting in repeated fire responses that strained City resources.
While Code Enforcement worked to secure properties, address substandard conditions, and pursue demolitions of severely damaged structures, the City lacked a proactive strategy to prevent vacant buildings from fires or preserve buildings with community value.
In February 2024, the Bakersfield City Council approved an ordinance establishing the Vacant Building Registry to address chronic nuisance and vacant properties. At the same time, a multi-departmental Working Group was created to improve coordination among City departments and analyze data to prioritize and address buildings that pose significant risks to the community. This Working Group includes representatives from City Manager’s Office, Code Enforcement, the Bakersfield Fire Department, the Bakersfield Police Department, Economic & Community Development, and the City Attorney’s Office.
The Working Group employs a ranking system to prioritize properties and determine corrective actions—such as demolition, owner rehabilitation, City Property acquisitions to create affordable housing or appointment of an alternate responsible party (Receivership) to bring the property into compliance.
The purpose of this presentation is to share the committee’s progress since its initial establishment, outline its ongoing efforts, and present the 2025 Chronic Nuisance Vacant Building Program Annual Report - Exhibit “A”, which details the program’s operation and accomplishments for the year.
CONCLUSIONS:
The committee will remain dedicated to reducing chronic nuisance properties through regular committee evaluations, coordinated enforcement, and continued efforts to improve community safety and neighborhood quality.
10/14/2025
3 6 1 5 S h e l l m a c h e r A b a n d o n e d
C o n s t r u c t i o n
3 6 1 5 S h e l l m a c h e r D e m o c o m p l e t e S e p t 2 5
3 8 0 1 M t . V e r n o n D e m o l i t i o n
c o m p l e t e d 2 0 2 5 3 8 0 1 M t . V e r n o n A v e , A b a n d o n e d d a m a g e d b u i l d i n g ,
CHRONIC NUISANCE VACANT BUILDING PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT 2025
The Code Enforcement Special Projects Team identified 127 properties in 2025 as chronic, vacant, and nuisance buildings. This includes properties that were posted as substandard or had sustained fire or structural damage.
Receiverships Update
There are currently seven active cases for potential receivership action. Four properties have been forwarded to the City Attorney’s office for court review and processing, while seven properties are completing Code Enforcement’s administrative process.
R ecei vers h ip co mpl e te 2 5
Structure ready for purchase
Demolitions Update
Since 2025, a total of fifthteen demolitions have been completed, nine of which were carried out by property owners.
The city has completed six demolitions through the administrative process for Abatement of Dangerous Buildings.
A bandon ed b ui ld ing Pos ted
Subs tan dard M ay 2 01 5
R ecei vers h ip co mpl ete d a nd
s tru c ture w as r ehab and s o ld s e pt
25 5 0 8 S H a l e y S t . f i r e d a m a g e
s t r u c t u r e 2 0 2 4
2 5 U n i o n A v e s u f f e r e d m a j o r f i r e d a m a g e J a n u a r y 2 0 2 5
5 0 8 S H a l e y S t . D e m o
c o m p l e t e d 2 0 2 5
2 5 U n i o n A v e d e m o l i t i o n
c o m p l e t e .
St ruc tu re s u f f ered f i re d ama ge
Pos te d Subs tan dard M a y 2 0 12
6 3 0 0 D e n n e n S t . d a m a g e d b y m u l t i p l e f i r e i s s e t f o r d e m o l i t i o n . 8 0 4 K e n t u c k y i s c u r r e n t l y g o i n g t h r o u g h t h e a d m i n i s t r a t i v e p r o c e s s f o r d e m o l i t i o n 1 1 1 7 C a l i f o r n i a A v e , b u i l d i n g d a m a g e d b y m u l t i p l e f i r e s i s s et f o r d e m o l i t i o n 1 4 0 1 K S t r e e t b u i l d i n g d a m a g e d b y f i r e s i n p r o c e s s f o r d e m o l i t i o n . 8 0 8 K e n t u c k y r e c e n t l y a p p r o v e d f o r d e m o l i t i o n
2 6 6 6 M t V e r n o n A v e . C u r r e n t l y i n d e m o l i t i o n p r o c e s s .
There are sixteen active demolition cases in progress, under contract or in various stages of the Code Enforcement administrative process.
Rehabilitations Update
There are fourteen properties under construction, or which have owners actively working to obtain building permits for repair or rehabilitation.
Properties To Monitor Update
Twenty-four properties evaluated by the group were determined to be ineligible for acquisition, demolition, or receivership action. Code Enforcement will continue to monitor those properties.
Seventeen properties identified as chronic, nuisance, vacant buildings are pending evaluation by the group to categorize the appropriate remedy. Code Enforcement staff will compile relevant records to assist with the analysis of these properties. 1 4 1 6 T e r r a c e W a y b e f o r e
r e h a b i l i t a t i o n
6 1 1 G r a c e b e f o r e t h e
r e h a b i l i t a t i o n
1 4 1 6 T e r r a c e W a y A f t e r
r e h a b i l i t a t i o n
2 6 8 8 O s w e l l S t b e f o r e t h e
r e h a b i l i t a t i o n
2 6 8 8 O s w e l l S t a f t e r t h e r e h a b i l i t a t i o n 6 1 1 G r a c e S t d u r i n g r e h a b i l i t a t i o n.
F i r e d a m a g e d U R M b u i l d i n g o n
B a k e r S t r e e t P o s t e d S u b s t a n d a r d J u l y 2 0 1 7
B o t h b u i l d i n g s w e r e d e m o l i s h e d b y t h e o w n e r w i t h g r a n t
a s s i s t a n c e t h r o u g h E C D
F i r e d a m a g e d U R M b u i l d i n g o n
B a k e r S t r e e t P o s t e d S u b s t a n d a r d J u l y 2 0 1 7
B o t h l o t s c u r r e n t l y i n e s c r o w
w i t h E C D f o r r e d e v e l o p m e n t .
Posted Substandard Buildings Update
There are currently 322 buildings identified which have been posted substandard and unfit for occupancy. There have been 459 follow-up inspections of posted substandard buildings to verify their status in 2024.
There were five joint enforcement operations conducted by staff from the Code Enforcement Special Projects and Rapid Response Teams, Bakersfield Fire Department Arson Units, and Bakersfield Police Department Impact and Animal Control Units. These operations focused on inspecting vacant buildings posted as unfit for occupancy and enforcing violations related to unlawful occupancy and other offenses.
During the joint enforcement operations, 25 vacant buildings were inspected, resulting in 26 arrests by the Bakersfield Police Department for violations related to entering or occupying posted buildings, as well as other misdemeanor and felony warrants. Animal Control impounded two dogs. No individuals accepted services or were transported to local shelters. Code Enforcement staff boarded up a total of 22 buildings to re-secure them against entry.
ECONOMIC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT UPDATES
The Economic and Community Development Department (ECD) started outreach efforts with property owners of chronic nuisance or blighted properties within the City of Bakersfield to identify potential redevelopment opportunities. As part of this process, staff evaluates the qualifications of subject sites (including zoning, location, site condition, etc.) and attempts to match them with available programs with the potential to revitalize blighted properties into beneficial uses.
Since 2023, ECD staff has engaged owners of 57 properties through solicitation , pursued seventeen properties through tax default acquisitions through the Kern County Tax Collector’s Office , and acquired one property through foreclosure , and is evaluating an additional fourteen properties for further action. To date, most of the properties pursued by ECD align with priority areas, such as the Prosperity Neighborhood Initiative, the Transformative Climate Communities program, and future redevelopment plans. Twenty properties have been acquired, two are pending a final sales contract, and another six properties are pending further negotiation with the owners which have expressed interest. In addition, eighteen received solicitation letters and are pending further responses, nineteen notified staff that they are not interested in selling their properties, seventeen are being evaluated for pursuit, and six properties are no longer being pursued for various reasons (e.g. sold to another buyer, owner is actively rehabbing). 30 properties that the City has pursued had structures demolished either by the City or the property owner since 2023.
Active Demolition Cases
# ADDRESS WARD TYPE CASE # STATUS
1 99 Washington 2 ADB 25-1821 Active
2 809 Golden State Ave 2 ADB 25-1093 Active
3 6300 Dennen St 7 ADB 25-1826 Active
4 2207 N St 2 ADB 25-3603 Active
5 4400 Joseph Dr 2 ADB 25-3919 Active
6 1117 California Ave 2 ADB 25-4303 Active
7 705 31st street 3 ADB 25-4324 Active
8 230 E 18th Street 2 ADB 25-4772 Active
9 3519 Jewett 3 ADB Active
10 1524 Beale Ave 2 ADB 25-5643 Active
11 525 Union Ave 2 ADB 25-5644 Active
12 2666 Mt Vernon Ave 3 ADB 25-3053 Active
13 1600 24th Street 2 ADB 24-5568 Active
14 804 Kentucky 2 ADB 25-7630 Active
15 808 Kentucky 2 ADB 25-7480 Active
16 1401 K St 2 ADB 25-8064 Active
Completed Demolition Cases
# ADDRESS WARD TYPE CASE # OWNER/CITY
1 508 S Haley 2 ADB 24-3269 Demolished by Owner
2 3801 Mt Vernon Ave 3 ADB 23-7259 Demolished by City
3 5543 Buena Vista 5 ADB 24-1133 Demolished by City
4 1101 Inyo St 2 ADB 24-3197 Demolished by Owner
5 1914 16th Street 2 ADB 24-3443 Demolished by Owner
6 2205 Wild Oak Ct 2 ADB 24-1576 Demolished by Owner
7 314 Augusta St 2 ADB 24-1142 Demolished by Owner
8 210 Sumner 2 ADB 24-1597 Demolished by Owner
9 25 Union Ave 2 ADB 25-0111 Demolished by Owner
10 600 17th Street 2 ADB 24-1982 Demolished by Owner
11 310 Clyde St 2 ADB 24-0023 Demolished by City
12 815 Gage St 2 ADB 24-0978 Demolished by Owner
13 700 Texas St 2 ADB 24-2270 Demolished by Owner
14 1405 K St 2 ADB 25-1642 Demolished by City
15 3615 Shellmacher Ave. 1 ADB N/A Demolished by City
Rehabilitation by Owner
# ADDRESS WARD TYPE CASE # STATUS Permits /Status
1 1416 Terrace Way 2 PM 19-4309 Closed
Permit #22-7501 for Remodel SFR was issued
7/28/2022 Permit valid until 08/1/2024. PO
waiting on PG&E to install post. Awaiting final
inspection.
2 2688 Oswell St 3 PM 14-685 Closed
1492SF TI FOR OMNI PHARMACY
Jeremy Manning 326-8936
[email protected] BLUMER
CONSTRUCTION 588-3000
3 611 Grace 2 RCV Closed Will check status
Property to Monitor Cases
# ADDRESS WARD TYPE CASE # STATUS
1 802 Union Ave. 2 ADB 17-7457 Active
2 631 Bernard St. 2 ADB 18-0014 Active
3 6300 Dennen St. 7 ADB 18-3658 Active
4 601 Melba Ln. 2 ADB 22-0294 Active
5 500 H St. 2 ADB 23-3068 Active
6 3412 Harvard Dr. 3 ADB 21-4768 Active
7 2688 Oswell St. 3 ADB 14-0658 Active
8 207 H St. 2 ADB 22-1194 Active
9 1400 18th St. 2 BLDC 22-2347 Active
10 1313 Niles St. 2 ADB 22-6467 Active
11 1001 S. Owens St. 2 ADB 17-0789 Active
12 200 E 19th St 2 ADB 24-2745 Active
13 5905 Camp St. 1 ADB 19-2485 Active
14 6100 Quaking Aspen 6 ADB 23-1324 Active
15 5703 Alice Springs Ave 1 ADB 22-0353 Active
16 1125 Snyder Ln 2 ADB 1009106 Active
17 2011 Chester Ave 2 ADB 22-5582 Active
18 330 S. Chester Ave 2 ADB 18-2698 Active
19 2604 Fairview Rd. 7 ADB 18-7690 Active
20 3604 K St. 3 ADB 14-2252 Active
21 820 Real Rd. 2 ADB 18-0964 Active
22 700 Hogan Way 6 ADB 22-3806 Active
23 1418 Terrace Way 2 ADB 17-7671 Active
24 239 18th St. 2 ADB 15-4733 Active
25 318 Vernal Pl 2 ADB 17-7612 Active
26 721 Grace St 2 ADB 13485 Active
27 80 Union Ave 2 ADB 21-5412 Active
28 1500 Pacheco Rd 1 ADB 19-5107 Active
ECD Property Status Update
Project Area
Property Status Old Town Kern Maritn Luther
King Area
Downtown Area Other
Property Acquired/In
Escrow 5 9 0 6
In negotiations/set to
be appraised 1 1 0 0
Initial Offer Letter
Sent (Response
Pending)
1 2 0 3
Letter of Interest
Sent/Response
Sending
2 8 1 7
Declined to Sell
5 7 1 6
Sites Under Review
1 7 0 9
No Longer Pursuing
1 2 2 1
Total
16 36 4 32
ECD Property Pursuit – Demolished Properties
Project Area
Property Status Old Town Kern Maritn Luther
King Area
Downtown Area Other
Property Demolished
By the City/Owner in
2023, 2024, and 2025
7 14 0 9
Commercial Vacant Building Registry Update
As of October 2025, there are a total of 73 identified properties within the service area (downtown and oldtown kern).
• 26 of the 73 properties have been identified as occupied and removed from the list. • 47 properties are currently on our Commercail Vacant Building Regestration list. • 31 of the 47 properties are in compliance. There have been no citations issued to non- compliant properties at this time.
• From January to October 2025 290 inspections were completed pertaining to Commercial Vacant Building Registration cases.
Current Commercial Vacant Registration List
# ADDRESS (by number) ADDRESS (by street name) WARD
1 2000 Chester Ave 2/DT
2 2001 Chester Ave 2/DT
3 2014 (2016) Chester Ave 2/DT
4 1806 Chester Ave 2/DT
5 1219 (1231/1225/1219) 19th St 2/DT
6 1822 M St 2/DT
7 1125 19th St 2/DT
8 2407 Chester Ave 2/DT
9 625 19th St 2/DT
10 902 (906) 19th St 2/DT
11 1101 19th St 2/DT
12 1030 19th St 2/DT
13 1917 N St 2/DT
14 2020 G St (1720 20th St) 2/DT
15 3105 F St 2/DT
16 1400 18th St 2/DT
17 1719 Golden State Ave 2/DT
18 2311 R St 2/DT
19 430 18th St 2/DT
20 239 18th St 2/DT
21 223 18th 2/DT
22 2511 G ST 2/DT
23 1100 California Ave 2/DT
24 416 Truxtun Ave 2/DT
25 1828 22nd St 2/DT
26 1824 22nd St 2/DT
27 1414 24th St 2/DT
28 1720 D St 2/DT
29 2011 18th St 2/DT
30 2128 18th St 2/DT
31 2131 18th 2/DT
32 600 34th St 2/DT
33 602 34th St 2/DT
34 1600 24th St 2/DT
35 2305 (2309) Chester Ave 2/DT
36 1801 Union 2/DT
37 1601 23RD 2/DT
38 731 21st 2/DT
39 2024 Q st 2/DT
40 230 E 18th 2/OTK
41 207 Monterey 2/OTK
42 521(525,531) Sumner St 2/OTK
43 717 Baker St 2/OTK
44 806 Baker St 2/OTK
45 950 Baker St 2/OTK
46 616 Kentucky St 2/OTK
47 960 Baker St 2/OTK
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: October 15, 2025 AGENDA CATEGORY: Deferred Business TO: Housing and Community Development Committee
FROM: Phillp Burns, Development Services Director
DATE: October 15, 2025
SUBJECT: Short Term Rental Update and Direction
The Committee will receive an update on the Short-Term Rentals and the concept to draft an ordinance to bring later to identify how to manage the Short-Term Rentals already happening throughout the City.
RECOMMENDATION:
Provide staff direction on whether to bring a Short-Term Rental Ordinance to City Council to manage these units throughout the City.
BACKGROUND:
Short term rentals ( or "STRs") have been a growing staple of the tourism economy, providing an alternative from traditional hotel/motel room lodgings for travelers. Although STRs technically include a hotel room or other traditional form of overnight accommodation, the term "STR" is now usually linked to short-term stays within homes in residential areas of communities, including apartments, condominiums, single family homes, and accessory dwelling units. The common denominator is the rental is for thirty days or less. The difference is that whereas hotels are usually permitted uses within the zones they are allowed, STRs are often not permitted within residentially zoned areas of a community, which are anticipated to provide for more permanent forms of residency.
With the advent of online booking engines such as VRBO, AirBnB and HomeAway, among many others, it has become easier for property owners to list a house, condo, or apartment as a STR and manage that rental without support from more traditional property management companies. These online booking engines have also made it easier to search and book STRs. STRs can be second homes that are used by the owner during a portion of the year, investment properties without a permanent owner- occupant at any time, or rooms or portions of homes rented by the owner-occupant to make ends meet.
The increase in STR activity, especially in residential neighborhoods, has created challenges across the country. Issues ranging from noise, trash and parking to a decline in available long-term housing options are regularly cited by residents in impacted communities. Across the State of California and the United States, counties and cities are attempting to strike a balance between regulating STRs to address neighborhood compatibility and environmental concerns while recognizing property owner rights. Resort communities in particular are attempting to find that balance while also acknowledging the role that tourism economy and revenue plays in particularly the smaller resort communities. STRs can generate millions of dollars in Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) revenue along with substantial accompanying permitting fees.
The main concerns with any land use regulation are: reasonableness and effective enforceability. Staff has begun to review other municipalities that regulate STR's. Due to time constraints, a reliance on previous analysis of California Counties is provided below. It is by no means exhaustive. Over 100
California municipalities currently have STR ordinances in place, including some comparable cites.
Staff will continue to gather information and look for what will work for our City that other have been able to successfully navigate.
The list demonstrates specific commonalities in STR ordinances, including:
• Separate permit required in addition to Transient Occupancy Tax certificate. • Renewal of permit required.
• Imposition of parking and trash regulations.
• Imposition of noise standards or guidelines.
• Posting of rules/regulations of permit and emergency contact information. • Requirement for a local 24-hour contact.
• Occupancy limits.
• Methodologies for enforcement and associated penalties.
As to enforcement, the ordinances range from administrative citations, nuisance abatement proceedings to the "3 Strike Rule" (3 verifiable violations during a prescribed period of time and consequences to permit occur).
Almost every ordinance reviewed to date charges a fee for the permit, thus allowing potential cost recovery of administration of the permit program. Code enforcement already has cost recovery provisions available.
The review of other municipalities also revealed that the Finance Department is not the department/division that is charged with administering or enforcing the permit program. In most cases, the department charged with these duties is the equivalent of Development Services. This is logical because the TOT ordinance addresses taxation and revenue and most if not all the above permitting regulations fall logically within building and zoning codes. Here in Bakersfield, Development Services is the logical choice for a permitting program as it has the expertise to provide permit issuance via the Planning Division and can also regulate and enforce the ordinance via the Code Enforcement Division. Additionally, the TOT taxation program is vastly different in scope than a land use permitting program. It is not advisable to merge them and, as a result, staff does not recommend that the TOT ordinance be amended to include land use regulatory permits or enforcement. A bridge can be provided in the land use regulatory ordinance to ensure compliance with the TOT ordinance.
If the City Council wished to pursue an STR program where staff researches and identifies STRs, adopts an ordinance, does outreach to those properties being used as STRs, and formulates and implements a system of regulation and tax collection for STRs, a significant investment in staff will be required. This memorandum does not fully analyze exactly how much staff would be required, but to operate an in- house program would require multiple additional staff members added throughout the process. Staff has the expertise and manpower to prepare an ordinance for consideration of adoption, but the overall implementation and management of the program over time is not currently in place. Additional enforcement personnel would most probably be required.
One option the City could consider would be to utilize contracted services to implement, manage and maintain the bulk of the requirements necessary for establishing a functional and successful STR program. Staff has completed preliminary dialogue with two firms whose expertise is providing STR support services to municipalities. Those services are scalable per the desires of the municipality, and usually follow the following tiers of service:
1. Short Term Rental Detection and Monitoring – The contracted firm would research all available Bakersfield short-term rental ad listings posted on all of the various STR sites and verify their status as STRs. The contracted firm would then connect the ad listings to property record data, and determine compliance with adopted code and the properties registration status. These listing would be maintained and updated as necessary. All aspects of the system and the databases would be accessible online by Bakersfield staff with unlimited licenses.
2. STR Property Notification and Reconciliation – The contracted firm would then notify noncompliant STRs and educate as to the STR rules for the City. If the property owner wished to continue utilizing the property as an STR, they would be directed to secure the required permit and then access an online registration process with the contracted service. The system would also provide automated notifications and annual license renewal to permit holders.
3. STR Tax Collection System – The contracted firm would then also manage an online TOT remittance to be forwarded to the City. An auditing tool to leverage captured booking data in comparison to tax collection data would be utilized so as to assess overall program compliance.
The contract firm also typically provides a Complaint Hotline, a 24/7 bilingual complaint phone hotline and online complaint reporting system that would serve as an additional code compliance tool. Again, the City would have access to all aspects of the system. A firm would be available to provide a cost outline for annual cost to the City.
STR specialized service firms advertise a greater than 90 percent compliance rate within a year or less.
The Code Enforcement Division would be tasked with responding to the remaining unregistered and unpermitted STRs in an effort to attain full compliance with the STR ordinance
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost to monitor the STRs throughout the City could be two or three code officers, which would be $200K to $400K program if this is done in house. If the City chose to conduct an RFP to hire a firm to do the Code monitoring the compliance with the new STR ordinance, it could be done for less than $50K plus significant revenue generated from additional TOT over the life of the program.
COUNCIL GOAL:
Economic Opportunity for All
Innovative and Efficient City Government
Safety and Resilience
ATTACHMENTS:
N/A