Minutes, regular meeting, second session — Bakersfield City Council, August 5, 2026 (part 1 of 9)

BAKERSFIELD CITY COUNCIL

POST-MEETING AGENDA

REGULAR MEETING

August 5, 2026, 5:15 p.m.

Council Chambers, City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION GUIDELINES
In accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act (California Government Code §§ 54950 et seq.), the City has established these guidelines to promote open, accessible, and orderly public participation in our City Council Meetings. Meeting agendas contain the topics to be discussed at a meeting and are posted 72 hours in advance of a regular meeting, or at least 24 hours in advance for special meetings.

Language Access & Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Accommodations The City provides reasonable accommodation for language access, including space for personal interpreters upon request. If you require special assistance to participate in the meeting, including reasonable accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act, please contact the City Clerk’s office at least three business days in advance during normal business hours at (661) 326- 3767.

In-Person Participation
Meetings are held in the Council Chambers at 1501 Truxtun Avenue. To speak, please complete a Speaker Card at the kiosk and submit it to the City Clerk before the meeting begins or before the item is called.

Remote Participation
The City currently provides an option for remote participation in meetings via audio only (telephonic participation). The remote call-in line is (661) 529-9511 and meeting code is 3952. Once connected, press star (*) for more options, press 1 to listen only and press 3 to request to speak. Remote participants must adhere to the same conduct rules as in-person attendees. For additional instructions, or to pre-register to speak up to 30 minutes prior to the meeting, visit the public participation page https://engage.bakersfield.gov/

Time Limits for Public Comments
Public comments are welcome only during designated portions of the agenda, and are subject to the following time limits:

Non-Agenda Item Public Statements (general City business): 2 minutes per speaker, up to 10 minutes for remote speakers and 10 minutes for in-person speakers (20 minutes total) •
Agenda Item Public Statements (including Consent Calendar, counted as one item): 2 minutes per speaker, up to 10 minutes for remote speakers and 10 minutes for in-person speakers (20 minutes total)
•
Public Hearings: For public hearings, proponents and opponents are each allotted 20 minutes for testimony, plus 10 minutes for rebuttal, to be divided equally between remote and in-person speakers.
•
For maximum impact, submit written comments by 2:00 p.m. on Thursday prior to the hearing for inclusion in the agenda packet. Written comments are also accepted up to and during the hearing.

All speakers who do not specify a topic on their Speaker Card will be scheduled to speak under NonAgenda Items. If you are not present or available to speak when you are called upon, the City Clerk will move to the next speaker and you may not have another opportunity to speak.

Disruptions
Technical or behavioral disruptions will be addressed according to Council policy. The meeting may recess for up to one hour to restore order or service, if required. Disruptive individuals may be removed or have their participation limited, regardless of attendance format.

We value your voice and engagement—it strengthens our community. Thank you for participating in your City government.

1. ROLL CALL

2. INVOCATION

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

4. PRESENTATIONS

5. PUBLIC STATEMENTS

5.a Non-Agenda Item Public Statements
*5.a.1 Written materials provided by Rod Guice
*5.a.2 Written material provided by Nicole Young
*5.a.3 Written material provided by John Harte

5.b Agenda Item Public Statements
*5.b.1 Written material provided by Mark Merrifield
*5.b.2 Written material provided by Bo Koenig
*5.b.3 Written material provided by Terry Maxwell

6. CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar items 6.a through 6.i for approval

6.a Minutes

6.a.1 Approval of minutes of the July 15, 2026, Regular City Council Meetings.

Staff recommends approval of the minutes.

6.b Department Payments and Agreements

6.b.1 Receive and file department payments from July 01, 2026 to July 21, 2026 totaling $33,939,226.04
as follows: department payments in the amount of $20,262,491.22, and Self Insurance payments in the amount of $13,676,734.82.

Staff recommends receiving and filing the report.

Page 2 of 2679 ends

6.b.2 Receive and file department agreements over $40,000 and under $100,000 between July 1, 2026
and July 21, 2026.

Staff recommends receiving and filing the report

6.c Ordinances

6.c.1 First Reading of an Ordinance - Zone Change No. 26-0001 amending Bakersfield Municipal Code Section 17.06.020by changing the official zoning classification from R-2/PUD (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling/Planned Unit Development) to R-2 (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling) zone on 20.56 acres, generally located on the westside of Old River Road, approximately 700 feet north of Panama Lane. Use of previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed. The applicant is McIntosh & Associates, Inc., representing Old River Properties, LLC (property owner). (ZC 25-0001) (Ward 5)
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend first reading of the Ordinance approving the change in zone classification from R-2/PUD to R-2, and use of a previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration.

6.c.2 Adoption of an ordinance amending Bakersfield Municipal Code Section

1.12.070 by adding Annexation No. 722
consisting of approximately 82.1 gross acres, generally located along the east side of Ashe Road, between Romero Road and Engle Road. (FR 7/15/26) (Ward 7)
Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance.

6.d Resolutions

6.d.1 Property Abatement Resolution for July 2026
Resolution confirming approval by the City Manager designee of the Code Enforcement Manager’s report regarding assessments of certain properties in the City for which structures have been secured against entry or for the abatement of certain weeds, debris and waste matter and the demolishment of dangerous buildings and authorizing collection of the assessments by the Kern County Tax Collector.

Staff recommends adoption of resolution.

6.e Job Specifications and Salary Updates

6.f Agreements

6.f.1 Agreement with Rosedale Union School District
(not to exceed $166,000) to provide School Resource Officer services.

Staff recommends approval of the agreement.

6.f.2 Agreement with the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania (not to exceed $300,000) to provide Cohort 5 grant program evaluation services.

Staff recommends approval of the agreement.

Page 3 of 2679 ends

6.f.3 Lease Agreement with Kern Behavioral Health and Recovery Services for Office Space at Brundage Lane Navigation Center
to provide onsite mental health services (Ward 2)
Staff recommends approval of the lease agreement.

6.f.4 Agreement with Dee Jaspar and Associates Inc.
($219,995), to provide construction management and inspection servicesWater Well CBK-85 Construction Project. (Ward 5) Staff recommend approval of the agreement.

6.f.5 Agreement with Provost and Pritchard Consulting
($148,200), to provide construction management and inspection servicesfor the L-208 TCP Removal Project. (Ward 4)
Staff recommend approval of the agreement

6.f.6 Final Map and Improvement Agreement with Summit Capital Ventures, Inc. for Tract 7405 Phase 3
Developer is requesting to enter into an agreement so the final map for Tract 7405 Phase 3 located northwest corner of E. Panama Lane and Cottonwood Road can be approved and recorded. (Ward 1)
Staff recommends approval of the Final Map and Improvement Agreement.

6.f.7 Transportation Impact Fee credit agreement with Encanto Holdiings LP and South Allen Parnters LLC
(not to exceed $49,990.32), for tract 7334 Phase 2 located at the northeast corner of South Allen Road and Panama Lane. (Ward 5)
Staff recommends approval of the agreement.

6.f.8 Purchase agreement and Farming Lease with Bolthouse Land Company, LLC
($600,480), for the purchase of future right-of-way located south of Stockdale Hwy East of Nord. (Ward 5)
Staff recommends approval of the agreement and lease.

6.f.9 Amendment No.1 to Agreement No. CM25-055 with Helm Holdings LLC dba Name Role Value
(increase compensation $190,000; revised not to exceed $290,000) for support with meeting Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG).

Staff recommends approval of the amendment.

6.f.10 Amendments to ARPA Agreements with Willdan Engineering and Community Action Partnership of Kern
Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 2024-309 with Willdan
Engineering (reducing compensation from $400,000; revised not to exceed $240,000) to identify non-permitted Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and assist households in bringing these structures into compliance; and

Page 4 of 2679 ends

Amendment No. 3 to Agreement No. 2024-304 with Community Action Partnership of Kern (increasing compensation by $160,000; not to exceed $1,092,464.03) for implementation of the Home Repair and Weatherization Program.

2. Staff recommends approval of the amendments.

6.f.11 Amendment No.4 to Agreement No. 2023-194 Kern Masonry Structures Inc. increase compensation $200,000; revised not to exceed $1,600,000 and extend term one year), to continue block wall repair. (Citywide) Staff recommend approval of the amendment.

6.f.12 Amendment No.3 to Agreement No. 2023-192 Centennial Asphalt Company extend term one year) to continue the supply of asphaltic emulsions and sealant for the Streets Division. (Citywide)
Staff recommends approval of the amendment.

6.f.13 Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2024-249 with Accenture Infrastructure and Capital Projects
(Accenture I&CP) (increasing compensation $1,382,021, revised not to exceed $4,873,610) for additional Construction Management Services of the 7th Movement Project. (Wards 1 & 2)
Staff recommends approval of the amendment.

6.f.14 Amendment No. 11 to Agreement No. 19-070 with AECOM (increase compensation $73,096.59, revised not to exceed $26,397,129.74) for Construction Management Services on the Thomas Roads improvement Program Centennial Corridor Mainline Project. (Wards 2 & 3) Staff recommends approval of the amendment.

6.f.15 Amendment No.19 to Agreement No. 14-288 with Parsons Transportation Group, Inc.
(increase compensation $138,103.41; revised not to exceed $43,237,362.33), for Design Support Services during the construction of the Eastbound SR 58 to Northbound SR 99 Connector Ramp.

Staff recommends approval of the amendment.

6.f.16 Contract Change Order No.8 to Agreement No. 2025-110 with JL Mc Daniels Companies ($36,621.04; revised not to exceed $877,501.72) for the City Hall South Annex Basement Remodel.

Staff recommends approval of the change order.

6.g Bids

6.g.1 Accept bid and approve contract with Unified Field Services Corporation ($676,857)
for the L-208 TCP Removal Project (Ward 4)
Staff recommend acceptance of the low bid and approval of agreement.

6.g.2 Accept bid and approve contract with South Valley Companies, Inc.

Page 5 of 2679 ends

($2,289,050) for the
Water Well CBK-85 Construction Project. (Ward 5)
Staff recommend acceptance of the low bid and approval of the agreement.

6.g.3 Stormwater Lift Station Rehabilitation at Chester Avenue and BNSF Rail Crossing
Accept bid and approve contract with GSE Construction Company, Inc. ($1,563,920.00) for said project;

1. Appropriate $850,000 from the Sewer Enterprise Fund (SEF) fund balance into the Public Works Department’s Capital Improvements Program within the SEF fund for said project;

2. Authorize staff to approve, as necessary, up to $75,000 in CityControlled contingency for unseen conditions encountered during construction of said project. (Ward 2)

3. Staff recommends acceptance of low bid, approval of contract, approval of appropriation, and approval of City-controlled contingency.

6.h Miscellaneous

6.h.1 Appropriation of $100,000 from the Fire Trust Hazardous Materials Penalty Fund to the Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) Operating Budget to fund critical infrastructure and emergency response technology improvements that support the Department's hazardous materials program and emergency response capabilities.

Staff recommends approval of the appropriation.

6.i Successor Agency Business

6.j Public Safety/Vital Services Measure

6.j.1 Agreement with Trans-West Security, Inc.
(not to exceed $250,000), for high-visibility patrol services.

Staff recommends approval of the agreement.

6.j.2 Economic Opportunity Area Grant Agreement with Arts Council of Kern (not to exceed $38,460) for site improvements that support reuse of a previously vacant structure. (Ward 2)
Staff recommends approval of the agreement.

7. CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC HEARINGS

8. HEARINGS

8.a Public Hearing to Present Findings and Consider Adoption of Energy Savings Performance Contract with Willdan Energy Solutions:

Resolution making findings authorizing entering into an energy savings performance contract for efficiency and infrastructure improvements projects.

1. Agreement with Willdan Energy Solutions (not to exceed $9,212,625) to implement energy savings efficiency measures, or other operating cost

Page 6 of 2679 ends

saving measures and equipment, as well as energy generation measures. (Ward 5)
Staff recommend opening the public hearing, taking public testimony, adoption of the resolution and approval of contract.
motion to not approve
*8.a.1 PowerPoint Presentation

8.b Public Appeal Hearing of Planning Commission’s Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 7500 (Phased)
McIntosh & Associates, representing Franmar Company and Loyola Properties I, LP, is proposing to subdivide 39.92 acres into 208 single-family residential lots, 1 sump lot, and 4 landscape lots in the R-1 (Single-Unit Dwelling) zone located at the northeast corner of Old River Road and Mc Cutchen Road.

Consideration of a Resolution adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 7500 (Phased). Lozeau Drury LLP submitted an appeal to the Planning Commission’s approval of the request. (Ward 5)
Staff recommends denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission’s decision to approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 7500 and its proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration.
*8.b.1 Staff memorandum
*8.b.2 PowerPoint Presentation

9. REPORTS

9.a Bakersfield Youth Commission Annual Project
Staff recommends the City Council receive and file the presentation. *9.a.1 PowerPoint Presentation

10. DEFERRED BUSINESS

10.a Consider Appeal and Planning Commission’s Approval of Director Review No. 25- 0002 and Modification No. 25-0007
and its Notice of Exemption from California Environmental Quality Act. Scout Services requested a Director’s Review and Approval No. 25-0002 to installation of a lattice tower to accommodate the City’s public safety radio system and related installation of new equipment shelter and generator equipment, and Zone Modification No. 25-0007 to permit a tower height of 150-feet and located within 300-feet of residentially zoned property located at 1000 Buena Vista Road. Bo Koenig submitted an appeal to Planning Commission’s approval. The Public Appeal Hearing was heard by City Council on June 24, 2026. City Council to act today. (Ward 5)
Staff recommends the City Council deny the appeal, uphold the Planning Commission’s approval of Director’s Review and Approval No. 25-0002 and Zone Modification No. 25-0007, and adopt the Notice of Exemption.

Uphold the appeal, deny staff's recommendation
*10.a.1 Staff memorandum
*10.a.2 Staff Memorandum

Page 7 of 2679 ends

*10.a.3 PowerPoint Presentation

11. NEW BUSINESS

11.a Resolution Adopting a Traffic Safety Policy for the construction and improvement of city streets
Staff recommends adoption of the resolution.
*11.a.1 PowerPoint presentation
*11.a.1.1 Staff Memorandum

12. COUNCIL AND MAYOR STATEMENTS

13. CLOSED SESSION

14. ADJOURNMENT

Page 8 of 2679 ends

BAKERSFIELD CITY COUNCIL

MINUTES
MEETING OF JULY 15, 2026
Council Chambers, City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue
Regular Meetings – 3:30 p.m. and 5:15 p.m.

REGULAR MEETING – 3:30 PM

1. ROLL CALL

Present: Mayor Goh, Vice Mayor Kaur, Councilmembers Arias, Gonzales (seated at 3:37 p.m.), Weir, Smith, Koman and Bashirtash

2. PUBLIC STATEMENTS

2.a. Non-Agenda Item Public Statement

1. Eddie Laine, Sierra Club spoke in support of community input for Tree Canopy (written materials provided).

2. Raul Contreras spoke regarding two day live stage nuisance in his neighborhood.

Mayor Goh requested staff speak with Mr. Raul Contreras about his concerns regarding a business operating without the proper business license and the ongoing noise nuisance they are causing.

3. Abby Power, Policy Advocate, Leadership Council for Justice and Accountability spoke in support of reasonable times and outlets for community input for Tree Canopy and request an extension deadline to the General Plan.

2.b. Agenda Item Public Statements
None.

3. APPOINTMENTS
None.

4. REPORTS
None.

5. CLOSED SESSION

5.a. Public Employee Performance Evaluation – City Manager; Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)(1) / 54957.6 Motion by Vice Mayor Kaur to adjourn to Closed Session at 3:41 p.m.

Closed Session meeting was adjourned at 5:11 p.m.

Meeting reconvened at 5:13 p.m.

Bakersfield, California, July 15, 2026 - Page 2

6. CLOSED SESSION ACTION

5.a. Public Employee Performance Evaluation – City Manager; Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)(1) / 54957.6 Vice Mayor Kaur announced City Manager’s evaluation has not concluded and will continue until August 5, 2026, City Council Meeting.

7. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Goh adjourned the 3:30 p.m. meeting at 5:13 p.m.

Bakersfield, California, July 15, 2026 - Page 3
REGULAR MEETING - 5:20 PM

1. ROLL CALL

Present: Mayor Goh, Vice Mayor Kaur, Councilmembers Arias, Gonzales, Weir, Smith, Koman and Bashirtash

2. INVOCATION
By Rick Anthony, Assistant City Manager

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
by Ariel Abrego, Public Works Department, City Summer Intern.

4. PRESENTATIONS
None.

5. PUBLIC STATEMENTS

5.a. Non-Agenda Item Public Statements

1. Abby Power, Policy Advocate, Leadership Counsel for Justice & Accountability spoke on behalf of Norice Torres regarding trash and safety on Filson Street near Cottonwood and East White Lane.

Councilmember Arias thanked Ms. Powers for relaying Ms. Torres comments and requested her contact information.

2. Manuel Ramirez, Lindsey Parker, John Harte (written materials provided), Serenity, Miguel Baustista, Carter Beardsley, and Charlotte Obrien spoke in opposition to ICE and in favor of a sanctuary City ordinance.

3. Justin Mokri spoke regarding a support letter for AB1599 for bus stop shade protection.

Councilmember Arias requested the Laws & Legislation Committee be presented with additional information on AB 1599: California Transit Stop Registry for discussion and consideration.

Vice-Mayor Kaur requested City Attorney’s Office organize a Truth Act Forum.

Vice Mayor Kaur requested the City Attorney’s Office prepare a policy relating to sanctuary city for City Council discussion at a future meeting.

Councilmember Gonzales requested staff present the topic of Sanctuary City Policy including a draft resolution outlining the City's position to the Laws and Legislation Committee for discussion and consideration.

Vice Mayor Kaur and Councilmember Koman supported Councilmember Gonzles referral.

5.b. Agenda Item Public Statements
Juan Hernandez Garcia, Field Representative from Assembly Bain's office, spoke in support of Consent Calendar item 6.f.4.

Bakersfield, California, July 15, 2026 - Page 4

6. CONSENT CALENDAR
a. Minutes:

6.a.1. Approval of minutes of June 24, 2026, Regular City Council Meeting. (Staff recommends approval of the minutes.)
b. Payments:

6.b.1. Receive and file department payments from June 10, 2026, to June 30, 2026, totaling $37,375,062.34 as follows: department payments in the amount of $35,378,232.60 and Self Insurance payments in the amount of $1,996,829.74. (Staff recommends receive and file report.)

6.b.2. Receive and file department agreements over $40,000 and under $100,000 executed between June 10, 2026, to June 30, 2026.
(Staff recommends receive and file report.)
c. Ordinances:

6.c.1. First reading of an ordinance amending Bakersfield Municipal Code Section 1.12.010 by adding Annexation 722 consisting of approximately 82.1 gross acres, generally located along the east side of Ashe Road, between Romero Road and Engle Road. (Ward 7)
(Staff recommends first reading of ordinance.)

FR ONLY

6.c.2. Adoption of an ordinance amending Chapter 13.12, Section 13.12.030 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code related to Development Standards and Specifications. (FR 6/10/26)
(Staff recommends of adoption the ordinance.)
ORD 5221
d. Resolutions:

6.d.1. Resolution in support of the Establishment of a Dedicated “Kids Zone” Childcare Space within the Kern County Courthouse.
(Staff recommends adoption of the resolution.)
RES 089-2026

6.d.2. Resolution providing for collection of delinquent sewer charges on the Fiscal Year 2026-27 property tax roll.
(Staff recommends adoption of the resolution.)
RES 090-2026

6.d.3. Resolution determining that Motorola radios for the Technology Services Department cannot be reasonably obtained through the usual bidding procedures and authorizing the Finance Director to dispense with bidding and negotiate the purchase from Motorola Solutions, Inc., not to exceed $300,000.
(Staff recommends adoption of the resolution.)
RES 091-2026

6.d.4. Resolution determining that Juniper equipment and software for the Technology Services Department can most efficiently be obtained through cooperative procurement bidding procedures from CDW Government LLC and authorizing the Finance Director to dispense with bidding not to exceed $500,000. (Staff recommends adoption of the resolution.)
RES 092-2026
Bakersfield, California, July 15, 2026 - Page 5

6. CONSENT CALENDAR continued

6.d.5. Resolution determining that Badger Meter water meters cannot be reasonably obtained through the usual bidding procedures and authorizing the Finance Director to dispense with bidding and negotiate the purchase of Badger Meter water meters, not to exceed $1,552,500.

RES 093-2026

6.d.6. California Department of Parks and Recreation Land and Water Conservation Fund Grant
(Staff recommends approval of the resolution, agreement and appropriations.)

1. Adopt resolution authorizing entering into an agreement with the California Department of Parks and Recreation, as the Administrator, for the Land and Water Conservation Fund Grant for the MLK Jr. Park Re-Imagining and Revitalization Project.

RES 094-2026

2. Approve contract with the California Department of Parks.

AGR 2026-118

4. Appropriate $11,909,000 of Land and Water Conservation Fund grant to the Recreation and Parks Capital Improvement Program. Staff recommend approval of the resolution, contract, and appropriations.

6.d.7. Resolution of Intention No. 2275 adding Area 4-329 to the Consolidated Maintenance District and preliminarily approving, confirming, and adopting the Public Works Director’s Report: area 4-329 (737 10th St., 916 & 920 Q St.): Street Tier = 1; Park Tier = 1 = (Ward 2)
ROI 2275

6.e. Job Specifications and Salary Updates

6.e.1. Job Specification and Salary Resolution Updates
(Staff recommends adoption of the new job specifications and resolutions.)

1. Amendment No. 2 to Resolution No. 145-2025 setting salaries and related benefits for the General Supervisory and Management Unit, updating unit name.

RES 145-2025 (2)

2. Amendment No. 3 to Resolution No. 145-2025 setting salaries and related benefits for the General Supervisory and Management Unit, updating salary RES 145-2025 (3)

3. New Job Specifications: City Intervention Worker I #70100 and City Intervention Worker II # 70150

6.f. Agreements

6.f.1. Renewal agreement with GIS Planning Inc. (revised not to exceed $17,560 and extend term to June 11, 2027), for ZoomProspector Software, a GIS tool integrated into economic development organization websites to facilitate business site selection, property searches and location analysis.
(Staff recommends approval of the agreement.)
AGR 2026-119
Bakersfield, California, July 15, 2026 - Page 6

6. CONSENT CALENDAR continued

6.f.2. Agreement with the 15th District Agricultural Association dba Kern County Fair (reimbursement to the City not to exceed $430,000) to provide security services for the 2026 Kern County Fair.
(Staff recommends approval of the agreement.)
AGR 2026-120

6.f.3. Agreement with Kern County Superintendent of School Alternative Education Division (KCSOS) (not to exceed $220,000 to the city) to provide School Resource Officer services.
(Staff recommends approval of the agreement.)
AGR 2026-121

6.f.4. Agreement with the County of Kern for the purchase of a Robotic Canine Unit for the Police Department to accept funding in the amount of $404,000 for the acquisition of a robotic canine unit.
(Staff recommends approval of the agreement.)
AGR 2026-122

6.f.5. Quitclaim agreement with Calloway North Investors, LLC for purchase of Easement. (Staff recommends approval of the agreement.)
AGR 2026-123

6.f.6. Gosford Planned Sewer Area reimbursement agreement with Deertrail VAG I, LLC (not to exceed $510,450) for design and construction of a portion of the sewer improvements. (Ward 5)
(Staff recommends approval of the agreement.)
AGR 2026-124

6.f.7. License Agreement with North Kern Water Storage District, BN Bakersfield 1, LP, for Tract 7093 Phase 3 ($6,000) to allow the construction of a storm drain line over an existing canal. (Ward 4)
(Staff recommends approval of the agreement.)
AGR 2026-125

6.f.8. Final Map, Improvement Agreement, and Landscape Agreement with Owners and Contractor of Tract 6397 Phase 1 Developer is requesting to enter into agreements so the final map located northeast corner of Madison Street and East Berkshire Road can be approved and recorded. (Ward 1)
(Staff recommends approval of the Final Map, Improvement Agreement, and Landscape Agreement.)
AGR 2026-126, AGR 2026-127

6.f.9. Final Map, Improvement Agreement, and Landscape Agreement with Summit Capital Ventures, Inc. Tract 7468 Phase 2 Developer is requesting to enter into agreements so the final map located south side of Stockdale Ranch Drive, west of South Wegis Avenue can be approved and recorded. (Ward 5)
(Staff recommends approval of the Final Map, Improvement Agreement, and Landscape Agreement.)
AGR 2026-128, ARG 2026-129, DEEDS 10057, 10058, 10059, 10060, 10061, 10062, 10063 Bakersfield, California, July 15, 2026 - Page 7

6. CONSENT CALENDAR continued

6.f.10. Common Use Agreement with Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) to allow the construction of a road over an existing 34” High Pressure Gas Line within Tract 7468, Sheeran Drive. (Ward 5)
(Staff recommends approval of the agreement.)
DEED 10064

6.f.11. Street Utility Cut Guarantee agreement with Race Telecommunications, LLC that ensures the appropriate repairing and replacing of streets after cutting existing roadways to lay utility lines.
(Staff recommends approval of the agreement.)
AGR 2026-130

6.f.12. Water Pipeline Crossing License Agreements to allow construction of water pipeline along Berkshire Road (Ward 5)
(Staff recommends approval of the agreements.)

1. Agreement with BNSF Railroad Company (not to exceed $3,900) AGR 2026-131

2. Agreement with Union Pacific Railroad Company (not to exceed $10,000) AGR 2026-132

6.f.13. Amendment No.1 to Agreement No. F25-009 Tates Janitorial Service Inc. (increase compensation by $60,000; revised not to exceed $120,000 and extend term one year), to continue the supply of Janitorial Services at the McMurtrey Aquatic Center. (Staff recommends approval of the amendment.)
AGR 2026-133

6.f.14. Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. CA25-012 with Duane Morris (increase compensation $50,000; revised not to exceed $150,000) to provide outside legal services in the matter of City of Bakersfield v. BKR, LLC dba Ramada BakersfieldNorth. (Staff recommends approval of the amendment.)
AGR 2026-134

6.f.15. Amendment No. 3 to Agreement No. 2023-209 with Fruit Growers Laboratory Inc. (extending term one year) for analyzing water samples to monitor TCP levels in the groundwater and to verify removal of TCP, as required by Division of Drinking Water (DDW), for City of Bakersfield’s Municipal Water System. (Staff recommends approval of the amendment.)
AGR 2023-209 (3)

6.f.16. Amendments to Agreements for purposes of completing the Bakersfield Temple Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
(Staff recommends approval of the amendments and appropriation.)

1. Amendment No. 1 to Applicant/Reimbursement Agreement No. 2025-010 with HKS Inc., (increasing compensation $54,000; revised not to exceed $263,524.80), for the preparation of an EIR.

AGR 2025-010 (1)
Bakersfield, California, July 15, 2026 - Page 8

6. CONSENT CALENDAR continued
item 6.f.16. continued

2. Amendment No. 1 to Consultant Agreement No. 2025-011 with Impact Sciences (increasing compensation $54,000; revised not to exceed $228,604) to prepare an EIR.

AGR 2025-011 (1)

3. Appropriate the additional $54,000 (HKS Inc. contribution) to the Development Services Operating budget in the General Fund.

6.f.17. Contract Change Order No. 1 to Agreement No. 2025-199 with Bowman Asphalt Inc. ($41,545.38; revised not to exceed $561,151.38), for the Street Improvements:

Mountain Ridge Drive between Weeping Rock Way and Lustrous Lane. (Ward 7) (Staff recommend approval of the change order.)
AGR 2025-199 CCO 1

6.f.18. Contract Change Order No.4 to Agreement 2022-278 with Day’s Generator Service, Inc. ($45,161.89; revised not to exceed $1,013,314.92), for the Backup Generator City Hall North. (Ward 2)
(Staff recommend approval of the change order.)
AGR 2022-278 CCO 4

6.f.19. Contract Change Order No.1 to Agreement No. 2024-281 with Innovative Engineering Systems DBA Agilitech (90,228.34; revised not to exceed $1,231,922.75) for the Signal Coordination Part 2 at California Avenue between Mohawk Street & Oak Street, Stockdale Highway between Coffee Road and H Street, and Brundage Lane between Oak Street and Hughes Lane. (Wards 2 & 6)
(Staff recommend approval of the change order.)
AGR 2024-281 CCO 1

6.f.20. Contract Change Order Nos. 23, 35, 36, and 54 to Agreement No. 2024-235 (7th Movement) with Granite Construction Company (increasing compensation by $32,509.79; revised not to exceed $28,102,546.72) for the Centennial Corridor East Bound 58 to North Bound 99 Loop Connector Project. (Wards 1 & 2) (Staff recommends approval of the change orders.)
AGR 2024-235 CCO 23, 35, 36, 54

6.g. Bids:

6.g.1. Accept bid and approve contract to Best Contracting Services, Inc., Gardena, CA, ($143,656), for Roof Replacement at City Hall South, West Wing. (Ward 2) AGR 2026-135

6.g.2. Accept bid and approve Agreement with Universal Wiring Group ($441,925) for New Automated Weather Observation System at the Bakersfield Municipal Airport. (Ward 1)
AGR 2026-136

6.g.3. South Mill Creek Village Fencing Project Accept bid and approve contract with DASH Construction Company, Inc. (not to exceed $329,360), for said project. (Ward 2) AGR 2026-137
Bakersfield, California, July 15, 2026 - Page 9

6. CONSENT CALENDAR continued

6.h. Miscellaneous:

6.h.1. Appropriate $1,941,878.96 of Litigation Revenue to Domestic Water Fund Capital Improvement Budget.
(Staff recommends approval of the appropriation.)

6.h.2. Interfund Loan Policy
(Staff recommends Council approve Interfund Loan Policy.)

6.h.3. Response to Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations regarding Traffic Calming. (Staff recommends City Council authorize the transmittal of the response to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court.)

6.i. Successor Agency Business:

6.i.1. Receive and file Successor Agency payments from June 10, 2026, to June 30, 2026, in the amount of $459,650.75.
(Staff recommends report be received and filed.)

6.j. Public Safety/Vital Services Measure

6.j.1. Accept bid and approve Construction Projects Agreement with Remedial Transportation Services, Inc. (not to exceed $436,925), for the Antongiovanni Park Grading Improvements Project. (Ward 7)
(Staff recommends approval of the agreement.)
AGR 2026-138
City Clerk Drimakis announced that Consent Calendar items 6.e.1. contains a staff recommendation to adopt resolutions approving salaries and benefits for specified units.

Motion by Vice Mayor Kaur to adopt Consent Calendar items 6.a. through 6.j.

Motion unanimously approved.

Councilmember Gonzales left the meeting at 6:07 p.m.

Mayor called for a recess at 6:07 p.m. meeting was reconvened at 6:12 p.m.

7. CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC HEARINGS

7.a. Public Hearing to consider Action Plan Amendment No. 2 to HUD Action Plan Fiscal Year 2025-26: Transfer funds from the Catholic Charities Food Bank Expansion Project ($645,344 CDBG) to the CAPK Friendship House Community Conference and Classroom Modular Project (Ward 1) for a total allocation of $645,344 to support the installation of a modular facility.
(Staff recommends the approval of the Action Plan Amendment.)

7.b. Public Hearing to consider Action Plan Amendment No. 3 to HUD Action Plan Fiscal Year 2025-26: Reallocate $250,000 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from the Greater Bakersfield Legal Assistance (GBLA) ADA Improvement Project to GBLA Fair Housing Services to support fair housing outreach, education, counseling, and enforcement activities for low- and moderate-income residents. (Staff recommends the approval of the Action Plan Amendment.)

7.c. Public Hearing Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act on behalf of the Housing Authority of the County of Kern
(Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing, adopt a Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) Resolution and approve the indemnification agreement.)
Bakersfield, California, July 15, 2026 - Page 10

7. CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC HEARINGS continued
item 7.c. continued

1. Conduct a public hearing as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to receive comments relating to the plan of finance for the issuance by the Housing Authority of Kern (Housing Authority) of Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds in the amount not to exceed $5,500,000 of the Authority’s Revenue Bonds (Bonds) for the purpose of financing rental housing projects.

2. Adopt Resolution approving the plan of finance for the issuance by the Housing Authority of Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds in an amount not to exceed $5,500,000 for the acquisition and rehabilitation of the project known as Baker Street Village RAD, a 37-unit affordable housing complex located at 1015 Baker Street in Bakersfield California and certain other matters relating thereto.

RES 095-2026

3. Indemnification Agreement between the City of Bakersfield and the Housing Authority of the County of Kern.

AGR 2026-139
City Clerk Drimakis announced that a staff memorandum was provided regarding item

7.a. transmitting a revised attachment.

Consent Calendar Public Hearing items 7.a. through 7.c. opened at 6:15 p.m.

No one spoke in opposition or favor.

Consent Calendar Public Hearing items 7.a. through 7.c. closed at 6:15 p.m.

Motion by Vice Mayor Kaur to adopt Consent Calendar Public Hearings 7.a. through

7.c. Motion approved with Council Gonzales and Koman absent.

Councilmember Koman returned to the dais at 6:16 p.m.

8. HEARINGS
None.

9. REPORTS

9.a. Approval of Temporary Grant-Funded City Intervention Worker Positions in the City Manager's Office Personnel Complement.
(Staff recommends approval.)
City Manager Clegg made staff comments and provided a PowerPoint Presentation.

Motion by Vice Mayor Kaur to approve Reports item 9.a. Motion approved with Councilmembers Weir and Bashirtash voting no and Gonzales absent.

9.b. Presentation regarding the Bakersfield 2045 General Plan Update (Staff recommends the City Council receive and file the presentation.) Development Services Director Burns made staff comments and introduced Della Acosta, Senior Planner, Rincon Consultants, who made additional comments and provided a PowerPoint Presentation.

Bakersfield, California, July 15, 2026 - Page 11

9. REPORTS continued
item 9.b. continued
The following made comments requesting extension of the comment deadline for community feedback; Abby Power, Policy Advocate, Leadership Counsel for Justice & Accountability, and Lytian Andrade Capellino.

Councilmember Arias left the meeting at 7:15 p.m.

Councilmember Weir left the meeting at 7:16 p.m.

Motion by Councilmember Koman to receive and file and add an additional 30 days and provide digital survey access. Motion approved with Councilmembers Arias, Gonzales and Weir absent.

10. DEFERRED BUSINESS
None.

11. NEW BUSINESS
None.

12. COUNCIL AND MAYOR STATEMENTS
None.

13. CLOSED SESSION
None.

14. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Goh adjourned the meeting at 7:18 p.m.

______________________________

KAREN GOH
MAYOR of the City of Bakersfield
ATTEST:
___________________________________

JULIE DRIMAKIS, MMC
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of
the Council of the City of Bakersfield

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 5, 2026 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent – Payments and Agreements TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Randy McKeegan, Finance Director
DATE: July 22, 2026
SUBJECT: Receive and file payments from July 01, 2026, to July 21, 2026, totaling $33,939,226.04. as follows: department payments in the amount of $20,262,491.22, and Self Insurance payments in the amount of $13,676,734.82.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends receiving and filing the report.

BACKGROUND:

In accordance with Bakersfield Municipal Code Section 2.08.020 the Finance Director must report the City's disbursements periodically to the City Council.

FISCAL IMPACT:
$33,939,226.04
COUNCIL GOAL:

Innovative and Efficient City Government
ATTACHMENTS:
1-AP Check Register 8.05.29
Oracle AP Check Register 8.05
7/22/2026 CHECK REGISTER
FROM 07/01/2026 TO 07/21/2026
PAGE 1
Check Number Vendor Number Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount 775533 10204 ASSOCIATION BKFD POLICE OFFICER FCU Jul 2, 2026 $24,608.34 775534 10200 BAKERSFIELD CITY FIREFIGHTERS Jul 2, 2026 $7,691.46 775535 10211 BAKERSFIELD FIREMEN Jul 2, 2026 $14,535.10 775536 10203 BAKERSFIELD POLICE BENEFIT Jul 2, 2026 $35,371.04 775537 10205 MUTUAL BENEFIT ASSOCIATION Jul 2, 2026 $2,386.25 775538 26810 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE CO Jul 2, 2026 $4,510.06 775539 22324 SEIU LOCAL 521 Jul 2, 2026 $22,490.76
775540 33184 EYEMED Jul 9, 2026 $5,660.01
775541 26810 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE CO Jul 9, 2026 $4,922.09 775542 30027 U S BANK - PARS #6746022400 Jul 9, 2026 $7,284.40 775543 30029 UNITED CONCORDIA DENTAL PLANS OF CA Jul 9, 2026 $70,035.75 775544 30020 UNUM Jul 9, 2026 $6,751.13
775545 10204 ASSOCIATION BKFD POLICE OFFICER FCU Jul 17, 2026 $24,338.24 775546 10200 BAKERSFIELD CITY FIREFIGHTERS Jul 17, 2026 $7,691.46 775547 10211 BAKERSFIELD FIREMEN Jul 17, 2026 $14,804.99 775548 10203 BAKERSFIELD POLICE BENEFIT Jul 17, 2026 $35,129.29 775549 10205 MUTUAL BENEFIT ASSOCIATION Jul 17, 2026 $2,386.25 775550 26810 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE CO Jul 17, 2026 $4,500.65 775551 22324 SEIU LOCAL 521 Jul 17, 2026 $22,392.33
9997896 10199 BAKERSFIELD CITY EMPLOYEE Jul 2, 2026 $204,261.00 9997897 30014 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT Jul 2, 2026 $332,931.33 9997898 10217 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST-303749 Jul 2, 2026 $62,718.92 9997899 30010 IRS Jul 2, 2026 $874,701.90
9997900 16863 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS Jul 2, 2026 $172,594.22 9997901 30025 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Jul 2, 2026 $18,615.91 9997902 20699 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS C/O Jul 2, 2026 $67,269.86 9997903 30028 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA-P Jul 9, 2026 $810,159.36 9997904 30021 KAISER PERMANENTE Jul 9, 2026 $387,264.96 9997905 10206 STATE OF CALIF - PERS Jul 9, 2026 $1,636,230.11 9997906 30025 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Jul 16, 2026 $18,416.98 9997907 10199 BAKERSFIELD CITY EMPLOYEE Jul 17, 2026 $202,815.00 9997908 30014 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT Jul 17, 2026 $355,380.15 9997909 10217 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST-303749 Jul 17, 2026 $62,060.92 9997910 30010 IRS Jul 17, 2026 $931,447.69
9997911 16863 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS Jul 17, 2026 $185,659.68 9997912 20699 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS C/O Jul 17, 2026 $67,130.47 36 Overall - Count
Overall - Total $6,707,148.06
$6,707,148.06
S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2026\COUNCIL - ADMIN\8.5.26\ 7/22/2026 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 07/01/2026 TO 07/21/2026
PAGE 1
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
819501 1170 BAKERSFIELD SENIOR CENTER 7/2/2026 $ 2,377.13 819502 4410 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 7/2/2026 $ 881,092.86 819503 4410 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 7/2/2026 $ 18,951.35 819504 4410 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 7/2/2026 $ 1,713.01 819505 4410 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 7/2/2026 $ 45,364.00 819506 4410 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 7/2/2026 $ 1,346.31 819507 4410 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 7/2/2026 $ 887,838.63 819508 4410 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 7/2/2026 $ 121,052.00 819512 0110 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 7/2/2026 $ 335,514.99 819513 4410 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 7/2/2026 $ 56,415.00 819514 0110 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 7/2/2026 $ 324.45
819515 0110 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 7/2/2026 $ 1,710.25
819516 0110 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 7/2/2026 $ 464.43
819517 3110 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 7/2/2026 $ 393.00
819518 3310 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 7/2/2026 $ 50.00
819519 0110 MARDEROSIAN & COHEN 7/2/2026 $ 31,687.75
819522 4210 OLAGUEZ TRANSPORT 7/2/2026 $ 1,592.14
819524 0140 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 7/2/2026 $ 48,692.21 819525 0110 SJVAPCD 7/2/2026 $ 325.00
819526 0110 SJVAPCD 7/2/2026 $ 750.00
819527 5110 T-MOBILE 7/2/2026 $ 369.77
819528 3110 TK ELEVATOR 7/2/2026 $ 4,771.00
819529 3110 TK ELEVATOR 7/2/2026 $ 18,180.00
819532 5110 ADVANCED DISTRIBUTION CO 7/2/2026 $ 10,303.86 819534 0110 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT 7/2/2026 $ 22,106.22 819537 5110 ALUMINUM CHUCK WAGON 7/2/2026 $ 27,952.61
819540 0110 BAKER SUPPLIES AND REPAIRS 7/2/2026 $ 6,694.24 819542 5110 BLACKHOLE TECHNOLOGIES INC 7/2/2026 $ 3,347.39 819544 0110 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS IN 7/2/2026 $ 4,547.90 819547 4210 GRAINGER INC, W W 7/2/2026 $ 7,476.00
819550 3110 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC 7/2/2026 $ 57,799.18 819555 4120 HOME DEPOT 7/2/2026 $ 4,858.82
819557 5110 JIM BURKE FORD 7/2/2026 $ 10,854.84
819559 0110 KERN TURF SUPPLY 7/2/2026 $ 9,114.26
819561 0140 NICHOLS PREMIER CLEANING SERVICES LLC 7/2/2026 $ 4,695.00 819564 5110 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 7/2/2026 $ 4,805.86
819566 1910 RLH FIRE PROTECTION 7/2/2026 $ 7,370.00
819568 4310 STINSON STATIONERS 7/2/2026 $ 4,664.71
819572 4210 VESTIS SERVICES LLC 7/2/2026 $ 5,261.69
819573 5110 1 800 RADIATOR & A/C INC 7/2/2026 $ 261.97
819574 1170 3C CAPITAL FUND INC 7/2/2026 $ 2,900.00
819575 0140 4LESS PLUMBING 7/2/2026 $ 3,200.00
819576 0110 A T & T 7/2/2026 $ 900.00
819577 5110 A T & T 7/2/2026 $ 72,235.94
819578 0110 A T & T 7/2/2026 $ 332.24
819579 0110 A T & T 7/2/2026 $ 430.00
819580 0140 A T & T MOBILITY 7/2/2026 $ 12,310.81
819581 5110 A-1 ALTERNATIVE FUEL SYSTEMS 7/2/2026 $ 1,962.36 819582 0140 A-C ELECTRIC COMPANY 7/2/2026 $ 40,993.41
819583 0110 ACC BUSINESS 7/2/2026 $ 3,103.76
819584 5110 ACOM BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 7/2/2026 $ 1,938.84 S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2026\COUNCIL - ADMIN\8.5.26\ 7/22/2026 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 07/01/2026 TO 07/21/2026
PAGE 2
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
819585 6110 ACTIVE LEGAL PROCESS SOLUTIONS INC - RE 7/2/2026 $ 275.00 819586 4110 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC 7/2/2026 $ 21,600.00 819587 5110 AEP CALIFORNIA LLC 7/2/2026 $ 2,685.03
819588 5110 AG SPRAY EQUIPMENT 7/2/2026 $ 256.08
819591 5110 ALL AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION 7/2/2026 $ 3,159.69 819592 5110 ALL THAT LETTERING SIGN COMPANY 7/2/2026 $ 639.29 819593 4110 ALLIANCE TECHNICAL GROUP LLC 7/2/2026 $ 440.00 819595 0140 ALPINE CHRISTMAS TREE LLC 7/2/2026 $ 1,656.00 819596 4210 AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL 7/2/2026 $ 23,350.00 819598 5110 APPLIED LNG TECHNOLOGIES LLC 7/2/2026 $ 3,958.67 819599 0110 ARGO CHEMICAL INC 7/2/2026 $ 7,558.79
819601 5110 AUTO TECH AND SMOG 7/2/2026 $ 1,169.99
819602 5110 AUTO TINT WEST INC 7/2/2026 $ 325.35
819603 5110 AUTOZONE STORES INC 7/2/2026 $ 506.04
819604 0110 B & B SURPLUS 7/2/2026 $ 378.88
819605 4310 B & R TOOL SUPPLY INC 7/2/2026 $ 67.98
819606 3110 BACSCO 7/2/2026 $ 22.26
819607 5110 BAKERSFIELD CHRYSLER-JEEP 7/2/2026 $ 584.56 819608 5110 BAKERSFIELD HARLEY DAVIDSON INC 7/2/2026 $ 1,235.78 819609 0110 BAKERSFIELD IRRIGATION 7/2/2026 $ 129.92
819610 0120 BAKERSFIELD RUBBER STAMP CO 7/2/2026 $ 29.17 819611 5110 BAKERSFIELD TRUCK CENTER 7/2/2026 $ 16.92
819612 0140 BARNES WELDING SUPPLY 7/2/2026 $ 109.79
819613 5110 BARNETT'S TOWING SERVICE INC 7/2/2026 $ 50.00 819614 5110 BERCHTOLD EQUIPMENT CO 7/2/2026 $ 933.93
819615 1860 BKFD LLC 7/2/2026 $ 119,250.00
819616 6110 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 7/2/2026 $ 655,206.82 819617 1520 BLUEPRINT SERVICE CO 7/2/2026 $ 1,564.24
819618 5110 BOBS WHOLESALE AUTO GLASS 7/2/2026 $ 1,012.71 819619 0110 BOLLES NURSERY LANDSCAPE 7/2/2026 $ 336.65
819620 5110 BORN AGAIN BODYWORKS 7/2/2026 $ 7,559.99
819621 0110 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 7/2/2026 $ 1,918.95
819622 4120 BRADY INDUSTRIES 7/2/2026 $ 1,726.12
819623 5110 BROCKS TRAILER 7/2/2026 $ 702.38
819624 4120 BSK ASSOCIATES 7/2/2026 $ 8,377.94
819625 0110 BUDGET BOLT INC 7/2/2026 $ 525.01
819626 5110 CAL VALLEY EQUIPMENT INC 7/2/2026 $ 16,484.23 819627 0110 CALIFORNIA SURVEYING & DRAFTING SUPPLY 7/2/2026 $ 3,533.06 819628 6110 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 7/2/2026 $ 750.00
819629 0140 CAMPO BAR & BOTTLE 7/2/2026 $ 10,000.00
819630 4120 CANNON CORP 7/2/2026 $ 2,024.25
819631 0110 CCS FACILITY SERVICES 7/2/2026 $ 7,045.00
819632 4210 CEN-CAL CONSTRUCTION INC 7/2/2026 $ 52,623.33 819633 3160 CEN-CAL CONSTRUCTION INC 7/2/2026 $ 76,980.41 819634 0140 CENTRAL CAL SURVEYS 7/2/2026 $ 450.00
819635 4120 CERTEX USA, LLC 7/2/2026 $ 229.94
819636 0110 CHAMPION HARDWARE 7/2/2026 $ 16.24
819637 5110 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 7/2/2026 $ 149.99
819638 0140 CITIGUARD INC 7/2/2026 $ 50,786.88
819639 0110 CITY RISE LLC 7/2/2026 $ 1,590.00
819640 4410 CLARK PEST CONTROL INC 7/2/2026 $ 94.00
S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2026\COUNCIL - ADMIN\8.5.26\ 7/22/2026 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 07/01/2026 TO 07/21/2026
PAGE 3
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
819641 4120 CLARK PEST CONTROL INC 7/2/2026 $ 196.00
819642 5110 CLEAN ENERGY INC 7/2/2026 $ 1,750.96
819643 5110 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT 7/2/2026 $ 2,065.67
819644 4110 CRIDER CONSTRUCTION INC 7/2/2026 $ 15,889.40 819645 0140 CRITTERS WITHOUT LITTERS 7/2/2026 $ 20,490.00 819646 5110 CUMMINS SALES AND SERVICE 7/2/2026 $ 1,076.20 819647 0110 CVIN LLC DBA VAST NETWORKS 7/2/2026 $ 1,199.00 819648 1910 DANIELLS PHILLIPS VAUGHAN & BOCK 7/2/2026 $ 550.00 819649 0110 DAVID JANES COMPANY 7/2/2026 $ 162.20
819650 0110 David R Vanbrunt 7/2/2026 $ 220.00
819651 5110 DELL MARKETING L P 7/2/2026 $ 1,583.51
819652 4210 DELTA LIQUID ENERGY 7/2/2026 $ 50.00
819653 1110 DERRICK D ENTERPRISE INC 7/2/2026 $ 379,208.50 819654 3120 DESOTO SALES INC 7/2/2026 $ 40.60
819655 0140 DIAMOND H HAULING 7/2/2026 $ 450.00
819656 5110 DISCOUNT RADIATOR CENTER 7/2/2026 $ 3,666.29 819657 6150 DNS ELECTRIC INC - REFUND 7/2/2026 $ 5,907.00 819658 0110 DUANE MORRIS LLP 7/2/2026 $ 15,433.01
819659 5110 E J WARD INCORPORATED 7/2/2026 $ 2,362.32
819660 0140 EMTS INC 7/2/2026 $ 54,901.00
819661 1740 ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY SOLUTIONS 7/2/2026 $ 51,752.51 819662 0110 Esteban Figueroa Jr Jr 7/2/2026 $ 471.00
819663 0110 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 7/2/2026 $ 47.10
819664 5110 FAST UNDERCAR LLC 7/2/2026 $ 2,157.66
819666 0110 FEDEX 7/2/2026 $ 10.42
819667 4120 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 7/2/2026 $ 863.95
819668 0110 FIRST CHOICE COFFEE SERVICES INC 7/2/2026 $ 212.14 819669 5110 FLEET SERVICES TOWING INC 7/2/2026 $ 100.00 819670 4210 FLS SUPPLY 7/2/2026 $ 58.46
819671 1740 Francisco Perez Jr 7/2/2026 $ 133.00
819672 0110 Frank D Molina 7/2/2026 $ 232.00
819673 4210 G H SLACK & SON 7/2/2026 $ 291.63
819674 0110 GAME TIME 7/2/2026 $ 35,120.56
819675 5110 GIBBS INTERNATIONAL TRUCK CENTER 7/2/2026 $ 841.13 819676 5110 GOLDEN EMPIRE TOWING INC 7/2/2026 $ 2,730.25 819677 0110 GOLDEN OX BRUNDAGE - REFUND 7/2/2026 $ 1,215.83 819678 4120 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY 7/2/2026 $ 653.59
819679 0110 GREEN RUBBER - KENNEDY AG 7/2/2026 $ 529.59 819680 5110 GREGS PETROLEUM SERVICES INC 7/2/2026 $ 11,718.27 819681 5110 H & S BODY WORKS & TOWING 7/2/2026 $ 100.00 819682 4310 H & S HOSE & SUPPLY INC 7/2/2026 $ 60.56
819684 0120 HANSENS MOVING & STORAGE INC 7/2/2026 $ 1,000.00 819685 4210 HD SUPPLY FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 7/2/2026 $ 613.21 819686 4210 HEATHER PENNELLA - REFUND 7/2/2026 $ 108.21 819688 4110 HF & H CONSULTANTS LLC 7/2/2026 $ 4,817.50
819689 0110 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF KERN COUNTY 7/2/2026 $ 11,980.00 819690 0110 James K Jones 7/2/2026 $ 1,761.91
819691 0110 JAN-PRO CLEANING SYSTEMS 7/2/2026 $ 1,558.30 819692 0110 Janelle A Klepic 7/2/2026 $ 254.00
819693 5110 JERRY & KEITHS INC 7/2/2026 $ 1,050.46
819694 5110 JIM BURKE LINCOLN MERCURY 7/2/2026 $ 4,171.92 S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2026\COUNCIL - ADMIN\8.5.26\ 7/22/2026 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 07/01/2026 TO 07/21/2026
PAGE 4
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
819695 5110 JIMS TOWING INC 7/2/2026 $ 250.00
819696 0110 John C Aguilar Jr 7/2/2026 $ 471.00
819697 0110 JUAN LUGO - REFUND 7/2/2026 $ 63.00
819698 5110 K & R TOWING 7/2/2026 $ 50.00
819699 6110 KAISER PERMANENTE 7/2/2026 $ 33,171.76
819700 5110 KELLAR EQUIPMENT HOSE AND REPAIR INC 7/2/2026 $ 450.00 819701 1910 Kelly Kathleen Sloan 7/2/2026 $ 6,012.63
819702 1520 KERN ASPHALT PAVING & SEALING 7/2/2026 $ 5,889.00 819703 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 7/2/2026 $ 50.00
819704 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 7/2/2026 $ 50.00
819705 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 7/2/2026 $ 50.00
819706 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 7/2/2026 $ 50.00
819707 6130 KERN COUNTY COUNSEL 7/2/2026 $ 409.70
819708 0110 KERN COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES DEPA 7/2/2026 $ 118.00 819709 4210 KERN COUNTY WASTE MANAGEMENT 7/2/2026 $ 166,389.86 819710 5110 KERN MACHINERY INC 7/2/2026 $ 629.67
819711 0110 KERN RIVER POWER EQUIPMENT 7/2/2026 $ 276.04 819712 0140 L N CURTIS & SONS 7/2/2026 $ 8,496.29
819713 6110 LAW OFFICE OF DAVID F LEON - REFUND 7/2/2026 $ 275.00 819714 5110 LEHR 7/2/2026 $ 1,187.76
819715 0120 LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA LLC - REFUND 7/2/2026 $ 13,997.32 819716 0110 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 7/2/2026 $ 135.00
819717 0110 LOOP ELECTRIC INC 7/2/2026 $ 15,630.00
819718 4110 LOWES HOME IMPROVEMENT 7/2/2026 $ 3,677.23
819719 5110 MAR-CO EQUIPMENT CORP 7/2/2026 $ 280.37
819720 1740 Melecio V Mahinan 7/2/2026 $ 514.92
819721 6110 MELISA WEINGART-PITTMAN - REFUND 7/2/2026 $ 200.00 819723 4210 METROPOLITAN RECYCLING LLC 7/2/2026 $ 135,290.53 819724 3120 MEYER CIVIL ENGINEERING INC 7/2/2026 $ 7,555.50 819725 0110 Michael S Richards 7/2/2026 $ 464.00
819726 5110 MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA INC 7/2/2026 $ 14,322.45 819727 4210 MINUTEMAN PRESS 7/2/2026 $ 124.36
819728 0110 MOM'S HOUSE CHICKEN & WAFFLES 7/2/2026 $ 350.00 819729 5110 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC 7/2/2026 $ 1,362.11
819730 5110 MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO INC 7/2/2026 $ 10.83 819731 0110 Nathan Hamonds IV 7/2/2026 $ 232.00
819732 5110 NAVIGATE360 LLC 7/2/2026 $ 2,363.57
819733 4120 NEW GEN ENGINEERING GROUP INC DBA MCINT 7/2/2026 $ 6,820.00 819734 5110 NORTH BAKERSFIELD TOYOTA 7/2/2026 $ 104.22
819735 5110 ONE SOURCE PARTS LLC 7/2/2026 $ 2,520.16
819736 6130 OVERLAND PACIFIC & CUTLER LLC 7/2/2026 $ 9,838.50 819737 6310 P & A ADMINISTRATION SERVICES INC 7/2/2026 $ 10,802.31 819738 4210 PIONEER PAINT 7/2/2026 $ 42.16
819739 4210 PREMIER VALLEY TRANSPORT INC 7/2/2026 $ 5,760.00 819740 0110 PRIMO BRANDS 7/2/2026 $ 2,340.14
819742 4120 PROUSYS INC 7/2/2026 $ 8,941.72
819743 4210 QCS QUICK CUSTOM SIGNS 7/2/2026 $ 3,818.87
819744 5110 QUINN COMPANY INC 7/2/2026 $ 1,212.36
819745 0140 RANCHO TREE SERVICE 7/2/2026 $ 10,244.00
819746 0120 RAYMONDS TROPHY AND AWARDS INC 7/2/2026 $ 62.22 819747 0110 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST. INC 7/2/2026 $ 273.17 S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2026\COUNCIL - ADMIN\8.5.26\ 7/22/2026 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 07/01/2026 TO 07/21/2026
PAGE 5
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
819748 5110 RENEWELL FLEET SERVICE LLC 7/2/2026 $ 3,066.42 819749 0110 ROBERT B JR MOSS 7/2/2026 $ 194.85
819750 0110 SAN JOAQUIN FENCE & SUPPLY 7/2/2026 $ 2,535.28 819751 5110 SAN JOAQUIN TIRES & WHEELS 7/2/2026 $ 99.95 819752 0110 SCP DISTRIBUTORS LLC 7/2/2026 $ 4,630.49
819753 0110 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY HOLDING 7/2/2026 $ 95.15 819754 5110 SMITH & SON TIRE INC 7/2/2026 $ 786.18
819755 0110 STANDARD PLUMBING SUPPLY DBA FLOYDS 7/2/2026 $ 24.44 819756 4210 STARS AND STRIPES 7/2/2026 $ 4,560.00
819757 0110 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC 7/2/2026 $ 555.00 819758 0110 T-MOBILE USA 7/2/2026 $ 215.00
819759 0140 TC WELDING & FABRICATION INC 7/2/2026 $ 1,075.00 819760 0140 TEL TEC SECURITY SYSTEM INC 7/2/2026 $ 2,494.38 819761 4210 TELSTAR INSTRUMENTS 7/2/2026 $ 32,971.54
819762 1110 THE MISSION AT KERN COUNTY 7/2/2026 $ 13,701.69 819763 0110 Timothy Whitfield 7/2/2026 $ 232.00
819764 6180 TODD GROUNDWATER 7/2/2026 $ 13,595.00
819765 4210 TOTER LLC 7/2/2026 $ 46,032.40
819767 5110 TYACK TIRES INC 7/2/2026 $ 2,642.44
819768 0110 U.S. BEHAVIORAL HEALTH PLAN 7/2/2026 $ 1,569.17 819769 0140 UNITED REFRIGERATION INC 7/2/2026 $ 1,162.17 819770 4120 USP TECHNOLOGIES 7/2/2026 $ 46,395.58
819771 1740 VERIZON WIRELESS 7/2/2026 $ 207.36
819772 0110 VITAL SIGNS 7/2/2026 $ 220.78
819773 4120 VWR INTERNATIONAL 7/2/2026 $ 468.19
819774 0110 WESCO 7/2/2026 $ 26,271.71
819775 5110 WESTECH COMPUTING INC 7/2/2026 $ 1,450.55
819776 1910 WESTSIDE BULLETS SOFTBALL CLUB 7/2/2026 $ 1,500.00 819777 0110 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 7/2/2026 $ 831.23 819778 4120 WITCHER ELECTRIC INC 7/2/2026 $ 1,847.50
819779 0110 Zachary D Harmonson 7/2/2026 $ 232.00
819781 4510 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 7/9/2026 $ 143,047.85 819783 0110 EAST NILES COMMUNITY SERVICES 7/9/2026 $ 4,045.14 819785 4410 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 7/9/2026 $ 800,048.31 819786 4410 SJVAPCD 7/9/2026 $ 624.00
819787 0110 SOCALGAS 7/9/2026 $ 136.71
819788 4310 SOCALGAS 7/9/2026 $ 22.80
819791 0110 GRAINGER INC, W W 7/9/2026 $ 4,808.03
819803 3110 HOME DEPOT 7/9/2026 $ 12,044.78
819807 5110 JIM BURKE FORD 7/9/2026 $ 17,276.07
819811 0110 KERN TURF SUPPLY 7/9/2026 $ 15,892.91
819814 0110 LOWES HOME IMPROVEMENT 7/9/2026 $ 4,359.55
819818 5110 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 7/9/2026 $ 2,696.72
819821 0140 STINSON STATIONERS 7/9/2026 $ 5,527.63
819824 4110 VESTIS SERVICES LLC 7/9/2026 $ 3,116.02
819825 0110 ADVANCED DATA STORAGE INC 7/9/2026 $ 71.30
819826 5110 ADVANCED DISTRIBUTION CO 7/9/2026 $ 3,942.87 819827 0110 ALEX BERNAL 7/9/2026 $ 200.00
819828 0110 ALEXANDER RODRIGUEZ 7/9/2026 $ 100.00
819829 0110 ANDREW ESQUIVEL 7/9/2026 $ 500.00
819830 0110 ANGEL ESPINOZA SANDOVAL 7/9/2026 $ 400.00
S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2026\COUNCIL - ADMIN\8.5.26\ 7/22/2026 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 07/01/2026 TO 07/21/2026
PAGE 6
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
819831 0110 ANTHONY BACA 7/9/2026 $ 500.00
819832 1740 Anthony R Romero 7/9/2026 $ 200.00
819833 3110 B & B SURPLUS 7/9/2026 $ 107.17
819834 0110 BARNES WELDING SUPPLY 7/9/2026 $ 607.32
819835 0110 Bianca L Arvizu 7/9/2026 $ 5,422.00
819836 5110 BLACKHOLE TECHNOLOGIES INC 7/9/2026 $ 272.84 819837 0140 BLUEPRINT SERVICE CO 7/9/2026 $ 126.65
819838 0110 BRADY INDUSTRIES 7/9/2026 $ 348.97
819839 0110 BUDGET BOLT INC 7/9/2026 $ 202.86
819840 0140 C A C E O 7/9/2026 $ 100.00
819841 0110 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 7/9/2026 $ 13,707.01 819843 0110 CHAMINDA DISSANAYAKE 7/9/2026 $ 740.00
819844 0110 CHAMPION HARDWARE 7/9/2026 $ 2,320.69
819845 0110 CHRISTOPHER ROBERTSON 7/9/2026 $ 300.00
819846 6110 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SA 7/9/2026 $ 500.00 819847 0110 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS IN 7/9/2026 $ 92.19 819848 0110 David M Cotter 7/9/2026 $ 232.00
819849 0140 Eileen Lewis 7/9/2026 $ 703.60
819850 0110 Erica Acevedo-Espinoza 7/9/2026 $ 42.98
819851 0110 EZEQUIEL RENE VARGAS 7/9/2026 $ 150.00
819852 4510 FEDEX 7/9/2026 $ 944.73
819853 0110 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 7/9/2026 $ 921.34
819855 0110 FFP FUND VI P2 PROJECTCO5 LLC 7/9/2026 $ 4,578.51 819856 0110 FFP FUND VI P2 PROJECTCO8 LLC 7/9/2026 $ 5,073.84 819857 0110 FIRST CHOICE COFFEE SERVICES INC 7/9/2026 $ 1,184.55 819859 1740 Francisco Perez Jr 7/9/2026 $ 192.00
819860 6110 FRIENDS OF OLEANDER - REFUND 7/9/2026 $ 500.00 819861 5110 Gabriel R Alvarado 7/9/2026 $ 13.00
819862 4310 GARDENERS SUPPLY INC 7/9/2026 $ 1,562.05
819863 0110 GLOBALSTAR USA INC 7/9/2026 $ 106.62
819865 5110 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY 7/9/2026 $ 1,234.29 819866 0110 GREEN RUBBER - KENNEDY AG 7/9/2026 $ 21.69
819867 4120 HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY 7/9/2026 $ 2,215.02 819868 1740 HALL LETTER SHOP 7/9/2026 $ 1,389.37
819869 4210 Hector O Hernandez 7/9/2026 $ 344.00
819870 6110 HOUSE OF MERCY MINISTRIES - REFUND 7/9/2026 $ 500.00 819871 4120 HUBER TECHNOLOGY INC 7/9/2026 $ 322,206.13
819872 0110 INTERNATIONAL E-Z UP INC 7/9/2026 $ 5,429.80 819873 0110 IRON MOUNTAIN 7/9/2026 $ 146.60
819874 1740 Isaiah C Jones 7/9/2026 $ 280.00
819875 0110 J & E RESTAURANT SUPPLY INC 7/9/2026 $ 56.98 819876 0140 Jason A Cater 7/9/2026 $ 548.85
819878 5110 JIM BURKE LINCOLN MERCURY 7/9/2026 $ 665.95 819879 0110 JOE MONTELONGO 7/9/2026 $ 375.00
819880 3120 JOURNEY AIR CONDITIONING INC 7/9/2026 $ 19,972.00 819881 1910 Kelly Kathleen Sloan 7/9/2026 $ 2,512.91
819882 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 7/9/2026 $ 50.00
819883 4210 KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 7/9/2026 $ 42,210.00 819884 5110 KERN MACHINERY INC 7/9/2026 $ 1,944.72
819885 4210 KERN REFUSE DISPOSAL, INC 7/9/2026 $ 10,979.92 819886 0110 KERN RIVER POWER EQUIPMENT 7/9/2026 $ 79.00 S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2026\COUNCIL - ADMIN\8.5.26\ 7/22/2026 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 07/01/2026 TO 07/21/2026
PAGE 7
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
819887 4210 KNIGHTS SITE SERVICES INC 7/9/2026 $ 449.33 819888 0140 L N CURTIS & SONS 7/9/2026 $ 51,747.46
819889 6110 LEONARDO QUINONEZ PULIDO-REFUND 7/9/2026 $ 393.23 819890 0110 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 7/9/2026 $ 450.00
819891 0110 LINDE GAS & EQUIPMENT DBA PRAXAIR 7/9/2026 $ 265.49 819892 0140 Luis Baez Cervantez 7/9/2026 $ 52.20
819893 1740 Matthew J Cushnyr 7/9/2026 $ 240.00
819894 0110 Megan G Clough 7/9/2026 $ 114.42
819895 1740 Melecio V Mahinan 7/9/2026 $ 200.00
819897 0110 Michael S Richards 7/9/2026 $ 40.00
819898 3120 MIDSTATE SHEETMETAL INC 7/9/2026 $ 3,990.00 819899 5110 MOTOR CITY SALES & SERVICE 7/9/2026 $ 687.85 819900 6110 NAACP - REFUND 7/9/2026 $ 500.00
819901 0110 ORIGINAL WATERMEN INC 7/9/2026 $ 4,999.99
819902 5110 P T O SALES CORP / TRUCKPRO LLC 7/9/2026 $ 55.93 819904 4110 PIONEER PAINT 7/9/2026 $ 6,375.44
819905 5110 QUINN COMPANY INC 7/9/2026 $ 256.69
819906 0110 RAYMONDS TROPHY AND AWARDS INC 7/9/2026 $ 123.41 819907 0110 ROBERT FOX 7/9/2026 $ 200.00
819908 0110 Robert W Morgan 7/9/2026 $ 1,103.00
819909 6110 ROCK HARBOR CHURCH BAKERSFIELD - REFUND 7/9/2026 $ 500.00 819910 0110 ROGER STEINBERG 7/9/2026 $ 375.00
819911 0110 SALCIDO, DANIEL 7/9/2026 $ 300.00
819912 0110 SCP DISTRIBUTORS LLC 7/9/2026 $ 884.44
819913 1740 SERVICEMASTER AT BAKERSFIELD 7/9/2026 $ 4,900.95 819914 0110 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 7/9/2026 $ 195.40 819915 5110 SMITH & SON TIRE INC 7/9/2026 $ 2,589.47
819916 0110 SONOVIA VARGAS - REFUND 7/9/2026 $ 63.00
819917 3110 SPECIALTY TRIM & AWNING INC 7/9/2026 $ 460.06 819918 0110 Spencer T Swezey 7/9/2026 $ 437.00
819919 0110 STANDARD PLUMBING SUPPLY DBA FLOYDS 7/9/2026 $ 312.13 819921 6150 SUMMIT CAPITAL VENTURES INC 7/9/2026 $ 86,518.70 819922 0110 TODAY CLEANERS #16 7/9/2026 $ 66.00
819923 5110 TYACK TIRES INC 7/9/2026 $ 5,466.48
819924 4110 UNITED RENTALS NORTH AMERICA INC 7/9/2026 $ 1,195.29 819925 4110 VERIZON WIRELESS 7/9/2026 $ 52,767.41
819926 0110 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 7/9/2026 $ 6,339.84
819927 4310 WESTAIR GASES & EQUIPMENT INC 7/9/2026 $ 78.20 819928 4110 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 7/9/2026 $ 1,116.15 819929 4310 A T & T 7/16/2026 $ 199.93
819930 4110 C W E A 7/16/2026 $ 259.00
819931 0140 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 7/16/2026 $ 29,836.04 819939 0110 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 7/16/2026 $ 51,197.82
819940 5110 COAST COUNTIES TRUCK & EQUIPMENT 7/16/2026 $ 538,393.44 819941 5110 COAST COUNTIES TRUCK & EQUIPMENT 7/16/2026 $ 604,967.19 819942 0110 CULLIGAN WATER CONDITIONING 7/16/2026 $ 566.00 819943 0110 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 7/16/2026 $ 128.00
819947 0110 GREENFIELD COUNTY WATER DIST 7/16/2026 $ 4,045.99 819948 0110 KERN COUNTY AUDITOR CONTROLLER 7/16/2026 $ 86,313.68 819949 4410 KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY 7/16/2026 $ 37,209.81 819950 0110 OILDALE MUTUAL WATER COMPANY 7/16/2026 $ 67.41 S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2026\COUNCIL - ADMIN\8.5.26\ 7/22/2026 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 07/01/2026 TO 07/21/2026
PAGE 8
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
819951 1910 PACIFIC WEST SOUND 7/16/2026 $ 33,263.63
819952 5110 SJVAPCD 7/16/2026 $ 2,763.00
819953 0110 SOCALGAS 7/16/2026 $ 199.92
819954 0140 TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVA 7/16/2026 $ 12,500.00 819955 0140 TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVA 7/16/2026 $ 12,500.00 819956 0140 TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVA 7/16/2026 $ 12,500.00 819957 0110 VAUGHN WATER CO., INC. 7/16/2026 $ 10,916.70 819959 5110 ADVANCED DISTRIBUTION CO 7/16/2026 $ 6,626.78 819961 5110 ALUMINUM CHUCK WAGON 7/16/2026 $ 7,000.71
819964 0110 BAKER SUPPLIES AND REPAIRS 7/16/2026 $ 4,961.23 819967 4120 BRADY INDUSTRIES 7/16/2026 $ 9,747.78
819969 5110 COAST COUNTIES TRUCK & EQUIPMENT 7/16/2026 $ 17,239.78 819971 5110 FAST UNDERCAR LLC 7/16/2026 $ 1,977.99
819973 4410 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 7/16/2026 $ 1,691.78 819977 4410 FRUIT GROWERS LABORATORY INC 7/16/2026 $ 9,045.00 819980 4210 GRAINGER INC, W W 7/16/2026 $ 7,683.04
819984 3120 HOME DEPOT 7/16/2026 $ 4,248.94
819986 4210 KERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 7/16/2026 $ 17,835.00 819988 0110 KERN TURF SUPPLY 7/16/2026 $ 7,641.27
819990 4120 LOWES HOME IMPROVEMENT 7/16/2026 $ 4,340.45 819993 5110 MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA INC 7/16/2026 $ 28,326.45 819997 5110 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 7/16/2026 $ 4,512.23
819998 4110 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CFM/PPC 7/16/2026 $ 313,529.28 820000 0110 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 7/16/2026 $ 138,471.54 820002 0110 PIONEER PAINT 7/16/2026 $ 12,374.86
820008 5110 STINSON STATIONERS 7/16/2026 $ 24,995.27
820010 5110 TYACK TIRES INC 7/16/2026 $ 21,376.50
820013 0110 UNITED REFRIGERATION INC 7/16/2026 $ 4,171.85 820017 4410 VESTIS SERVICES LLC 7/16/2026 $ 4,933.43
820019 0110 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 7/16/2026 $ 2,718.66 820020 5110 A T & T 7/16/2026 $ 9,479.54
820021 0110 A T & T 7/16/2026 $ 775.00
820022 0110 A T & T 7/16/2026 $ 425.00
820023 0110 A T & T 7/16/2026 $ 175.00
820024 5110 A-1 ALTERNATIVE FUEL SYSTEMS 7/16/2026 $ 1,962.36 820025 6110 ACTIVE LEGAL PROCESS SOLUTIONS INC - RE 7/16/2026 $ 275.00 820026 5110 ADVANCE MOBILE SECURITY 7/16/2026 $ 1,501.62 820027 0110 ADVANCED DATA STORAGE INC 7/16/2026 $ 405.23 820028 6110 ADVANCED LEGAL PROCESS SERVICES - REFUN 7/16/2026 $ 36.64 820029 4120 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC 7/16/2026 $ 39,709.50 820030 5110 AG SPRAY EQUIPMENT 7/16/2026 $ 53.22
820033 0110 ALL AMERICAN GLASS 7/16/2026 $ 191.25
820034 5110 ALL THAT LETTERING SIGN COMPANY 7/16/2026 $ 900.00 820035 9110 AME BUILDERS INC 7/16/2026 $ 495.93
820036 9110 AMERICAN INTEGRATED RESOURCES 7/16/2026 $ 1,008.68 820037 0110 AMERICAN SAFETY SERVICES INC 7/16/2026 $ 254.72 820038 1110 AMERINATIONAL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC 7/16/2026 $ 1,027.66 820040 9110 ANDERSON GROUP INTERNATIONAL 7/16/2026 $ 1,847.49 820041 5110 APPLIED LNG TECHNOLOGIES LLC 7/16/2026 $ 3,961.18 820042 0110 ARGO CHEMICAL INC 7/16/2026 $ 9,158.61
820043 5110 ARISTATEK INC 7/16/2026 $ 2,997.00
S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2026\COUNCIL - ADMIN\8.5.26\ 7/22/2026 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 07/01/2026 TO 07/21/2026
PAGE 9
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
820044 6110 ATTORNEYS CERTIFIED SERVICES - REFUND 7/16/2026 $ 273.20 820045 4410 B & R TOOL SUPPLY INC 7/16/2026 $ 767.45
820046 4210 BACSCO 7/16/2026 $ 1,006.91
820047 0120 BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIAN 7/16/2026 $ 502.04
820048 0110 BAKERSFIELD IRRIGATION 7/16/2026 $ 43.00
820049 0110 BAKERSFIELD KERN REGIONAL HOMELESS COLL 7/16/2026 $ 298,846.30 820050 5110 BAKERSFIELD TRUCK CENTER 7/16/2026 $ 5,124.01 820051 5110 BLACKHOLE TECHNOLOGIES INC 7/16/2026 $ 36,112.18 820052 0110 BLUEPRINT SERVICE CO 7/16/2026 $ 328.54
820053 5110 BOBS WHOLESALE AUTO GLASS 7/16/2026 $ 618.25 820054 5110 BORN AGAIN BODYWORKS 7/16/2026 $ 7,159.83
820055 0110 BROADCAST MUSIC INC 7/16/2026 $ 5,133.00
820056 5110 BROCKS TRAILER 7/16/2026 $ 2,054.57
820057 0110 BUDGET BOLT INC 7/16/2026 $ 100.13
820058 5110 CAL VALLEY EQUIPMENT INC 7/16/2026 $ 1,727.09 820059 5110 CAL-LINE EQUIPMENT INC 7/16/2026 $ 704.80
820060 5110 CALIFORNIA FUELS & LUBRICANTS 7/16/2026 $ 305,417.05 820061 0110 CARL NICITA 7/16/2026 $ 25.00
820062 3120 CEN-CAL CONSTRUCTION INC 7/16/2026 $ 760,363.56 820063 1130 CENTRAL CAL SURVEYS 7/16/2026 $ 8,000.00
820064 5110 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA POWER INC 7/16/2026 $ 54.07 820065 4110 CENTRAL VALLEY SALINITY COALITION INC 7/16/2026 $ 38,896.00 820066 0110 CETRIX TECHNOLOGIES LLC 7/16/2026 $ 5,348.63 820067 0110 CHAMPION HARDWARE 7/16/2026 $ 991.27
820068 0110 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 7/16/2026 $ 321.14
820069 0110 CHEMSEARCH FE 7/16/2026 $ 2,495.16
820070 5110 CHESTER AVENUE BRAKE & SUPPLY 7/16/2026 $ 2,763.61 820071 0110 CHRISTOPHER ROBERTSON 7/16/2026 $ 350.00
820072 1450 CITIGUARD INC 7/16/2026 $ 35,712.00
820073 4410 CLARK PEST CONTROL INC 7/16/2026 $ 94.00
820074 5110 CLAWSON AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT & SERVICE 7/16/2026 $ 180.00 820075 5110 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT 7/16/2026 $ 903.83
820076 0110 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS IN 7/16/2026 $ 7,232.63 820077 0110 CONTRABAND CONTROL SPECIALISTS INC 7/16/2026 $ 46.50 820078 0140 CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING INC 7/16/2026 $ 5,364.25 820079 1860 COUNTY OF KERN - COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE 7/16/2026 $ 111,787.34 820080 0110 COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE 7/16/2026 $ 150.00
820081 4110 CRIDER CONSTRUCTION INC 7/16/2026 $ 19,430.62 820082 3160 CROSSTOWN ELECTRICAL & DATA 7/16/2026 $ 269,878.80 820083 5110 DAVES FLEET MAINT & TOWING INC 7/16/2026 $ 50.00 820084 4410 DEE JASPAR & ASSOCIATES INC 7/16/2026 $ 2,221.13 820085 9110 DENNIS GROUP 7/16/2026 $ 763.51
820086 0140 DIAMOND H HAULING 7/16/2026 $ 350.00
820087 1520 DIVERSIFIED PROJECT SERVICES INTERNATIO 7/16/2026 $ 38,435.00 820088 4410 DUANE MORRIS LLP 7/16/2026 $ 62,500.00
820089 4120 DXP ENTERPRISES INC 7/16/2026 $ 23,377.57
820090 0110 EAN SERVICES LLC 7/16/2026 $ 15,233.41
820091 5110 ELBERT DISTRIBUTING 7/16/2026 $ 272.48
820092 0110 ELECTRIC MOTOR WORKS INC 7/16/2026 $ 3,463.60 820093 9110 ELITE CONSTRUCTION 7/16/2026 $ 1,713.97
820094 4120 EMERSON LLLP 7/16/2026 $ 35,409.60
S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2026\COUNCIL - ADMIN\8.5.26\ 7/22/2026 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 07/01/2026 TO 07/21/2026
PAGE 10
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
820095 9110 EMMERSON CONSTRUCTION INC 7/16/2026 $ 6,538.03 820096 5110 ENGINEERED AIR 7/16/2026 $ 52.22
820097 0110 ERNEST PACKING SOLUTIONS INC 7/16/2026 $ 5,894.86 820098 0110 EZEQUIEL RENE VARGAS 7/16/2026 $ 200.00
820099 5110 F F GOMEZ INC 7/16/2026 $ 5,102.98
820100 0110 FASTENAL COMPANY 7/16/2026 $ 1,203.17
820101 0110 FEDEX 7/16/2026 $ 131.10
820102 0110 FIRST CHOICE COFFEE SERVICES INC 7/16/2026 $ 221.11 820103 0110 FISH ENTERPISES INC 7/16/2026 $ 1,290.00
820104 5110 FLEET PRIDE INC 7/16/2026 $ 48.23
820105 0110 FLOOD BAKERSFIELD MINISTRIES 7/16/2026 $ 43,181.73 820106 5110 FLS SUPPLY 7/16/2026 $ 2,493.00
820107 0110 FOREFRONT POWER DEVELOPMENT LLC 7/16/2026 $ 11,930.24 820108 0110 GENERAL CODE LLC 7/16/2026 $ 78.00
820109 5110 GIBBS INTERNATIONAL TRUCK CENTER 7/16/2026 $ 80.55 820110 5110 GOLDEN EMPIRE TOWING INC 7/16/2026 $ 1,617.00 820111 0110 GOVINVEST INC 7/16/2026 $ 47,500.00
820112 1450 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY 7/16/2026 $ 139,243.46 820113 0110 GREEN RUBBER - KENNEDY AG 7/16/2026 $ 368.43 820114 5110 GREGS PETROLEUM SERVICES INC 7/16/2026 $ 10,130.86 820115 5110 HADDAD DODGE 7/16/2026 $ 2,635.10
820116 0110 HALL LETTER SHOP 7/16/2026 $ 126.00
820117 3120 HIGHSTREET IT SOLUTIONS LLC 7/16/2026 $ 5,833.33 820118 9110 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS 7/16/2026 $ 117.62
820119 0110 HPS MECHANICAL INC 7/16/2026 $ 61,626.85
820120 0110 IMANDEEP MATHARU-REFUND 7/16/2026 $ 224.73
820121 0110 INCOGNITO DESIGNZ 7/16/2026 $ 66.49
820122 3160 INNOVATIVE ENGINEERING SYSTEMS INC DBA 7/16/2026 $ 215,695.01 820123 9110 JASTRO BAKER LLC 7/16/2026 $ 227.47
820124 5110 JERRY & KEITHS INC 7/16/2026 $ 4,330.17
820125 0140 JERRYS PIZZA & PUB 7/16/2026 $ 22,500.00
820126 5110 JIM BURKE FORD 7/16/2026 $ 1,732.67
820127 6110 KALA BHASKAR - REFUND 7/16/2026 $ 4,435.00
820129 5110 KELLAR EQUIPMENT 7/16/2026 $ 92.00
820130 5110 KELLAR EQUIPMENT HOSE AND REPAIR INC 7/16/2026 $ 803.68 820131 0110 KERN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION 7/16/2026 $ 150,571.42 820132 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 7/16/2026 $ 50.00
820133 6110 KERN COUNTY CLERKS 7/16/2026 $ 3,093.75
820134 5110 KERN MACHINERY INC 7/16/2026 $ 966.97
820135 4310 KERN RIVER POWER EQUIPMENT 7/16/2026 $ 106.05 820136 6110 LAW OFFICE OF GEORGE R HORRIGAN APLC - 7/16/2026 $ 466.52 820137 0110 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 7/16/2026 $ 104.79
820138 0110 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC 7/16/2026 $ 3,836.88 820139 6110 LONI O'DONLEY 7/16/2026 $ 39.00
820140 6110 MANUEL MONCLOVA - REFUND 7/16/2026 $ 200.00 820141 0110 Matthew Aguilar 7/16/2026 $ 232.00
820142 6110 MAURICIO VASQUEZ - REFUND 7/16/2026 $ 200.00 820143 0140 MCCORMICKS LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 7/16/2026 $ 7,054.00 820144 0140 MCDANIELS CONSTRUCTION 7/16/2026 $ 121,952.24 820145 4120 MEYER CIVIL ENGINEERING INC 7/16/2026 $ 34,900.00 820146 4210 MINUTEMAN PRESS 7/16/2026 $ 408.52
S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2026\COUNCIL - ADMIN\8.5.26\ 7/22/2026 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 07/01/2026 TO 07/21/2026
PAGE 11
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
820147 0140 MJS SOLUTIONS LLC 7/16/2026 $ 775.00
820148 5110 MOTOR CITY SALES & SERVICE 7/16/2026 $ 278.16 820149 0110 NISHIKAWA PROPERTY MAINTENANCE INC 7/16/2026 $ 16,940.00 820150 9110 NORTHSTAR RECYCLING CO 7/16/2026 $ 791.75
820151 0110 P & A ADMINISTRATION SERVICES INC 7/16/2026 $ 11,990.00 820152 5110 PAPE MACHINERY INC 7/16/2026 $ 166.96
820153 1450 PARK WAREHOUSE LLC 7/16/2026 $ 18,846.74
820154 1210 PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP INC 7/16/2026 $ 359,951.68 820155 5110 PAYLESS TOWING 7/16/2026 $ 50.00
820156 5110 PB LOADER MANUFACTURING CO 7/16/2026 $ 19,288.03 820157 0140 PENSINGER TRAILER RENTALS 7/16/2026 $ 71.43 820158 0110 PEOPLE FACTS LLC 7/16/2026 $ 16.67
820159 5110 PERFORMANCE TRUCK REPAIR 7/16/2026 $ 20,892.65 820160 9110 PG&E-TRUXTUN "ZARAGOZA" 7/16/2026 $ 788.23
820161 5110 PLUMBERS DEPOT 7/16/2026 $ 93.24
820162 9110 POTENTIAL ELECTRICAL 7/16/2026 $ 1,244.95
820163 5110 POWER MACHINERY CENTER 7/16/2026 $ 62.38
820164 5110 POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO INC 7/16/2026 $ 2,143.20 820165 0110 PRIMO BRANDS 7/16/2026 $ 1,745.18
820167 0110 PROFORMA SOLUTIONS FOR PRINTING 7/16/2026 $ 3,465.56 820168 3110 PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING INC 7/16/2026 $ 39,462.79 820170 5110 QCS QUICK CUSTOM SIGNS 7/16/2026 $ 3,404.32 820171 4310 QK 7/16/2026 $ 110,782.50
820172 5110 QUINN COMPANY INC 7/16/2026 $ 1,105.85
820173 4120 Rafael Alcaraz-Martinez 7/16/2026 $ 539.00
820174 6110 RAI LAW FIRM - REFUND 7/16/2026 $ 749.41
820175 5110 RANDYS TOWING LLC 7/16/2026 $ 50.00
820176 5110 RAY GASKIN SERVICE INC 7/16/2026 $ 20.29
820177 5110 RAYMONDS TROPHY AND AWARDS INC 7/16/2026 $ 28.69 820178 3110 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DIST. INC 7/16/2026 $ 792.65 820179 6110 REGINA SHELTON DBA 2 QUEENS FITNESS 7/16/2026 $ 52.00 820180 5110 RENEWELL FLEET SERVICE LLC 7/16/2026 $ 1,582.33 820181 9110 RETRIEVER WASTE MANAGEMENT 7/16/2026 $ 900.94 820182 5110 RICHARDS CRANE SERVICE LLC 7/16/2026 $ 2,960.88 820183 0110 RIGHT NOW COURIERS LLC 7/16/2026 $ 67.50
820184 0110 RLH FIRE PROTECTION 7/16/2026 $ 195.00
820185 0110 Robert W Morgan 7/16/2026 $ 40.00
820186 3120 S C ANDERSON INC 7/16/2026 $ 44,057.03
820187 9110 SAINT JOSEPH CHURCH 7/16/2026 $ 1,658.66
820188 0140 SAN DIEGO LANDSYSTEMS LLC 7/16/2026 $ 20,538.00 820189 4310 SAN JOAQUIN FENCE & SUPPLY 7/16/2026 $ 65,910.00 820190 5110 SAN JOAQUIN TIRES & WHEELS 7/16/2026 $ 299.85 820191 0110 SCP DISTRIBUTORS LLC 7/16/2026 $ 2,416.28
820192 5110 SEHI COMPUTER PRODUCTS INC 7/16/2026 $ 18,185.84 820193 3120 SEQUOIA PAINT ENTERPRISE 7/16/2026 $ 687.36 820194 9110 SIGNAL HILL BUILDERS 7/16/2026 $ 3,384.69
820195 4120 SILVAS OIL CO INC 7/16/2026 $ 23,769.21
820196 4110 SLATER PLUMBING & MECHANICAL 7/16/2026 $ 4,500.00 820197 0110 SMART & FINAL IRIS COMPANY 7/16/2026 $ 688.80 820198 5110 SMITH & SON TIRE INC 7/16/2026 $ 8,786.28
820199 1520 SOILS ENGINEERING INC 7/16/2026 $ 24,338.00 S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2026\COUNCIL - ADMIN\8.5.26\ 7/22/2026 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 07/01/2026 TO 07/21/2026
PAGE 12
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
820200 4410 SOUTH VALLEY COMPANIES INC 7/16/2026 $ 35,576.43 820201 4210 SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE 7/16/2026 $ 696.71 820202 4210 SPARTAN INC 7/16/2026 $ 2,250.00
820203 5110 SPARTAN TRUCK CO INC 7/16/2026 $ 2,882.18
820204 0140 SPECTRUM CANINE ISABEL LLC 7/16/2026 $ 5,920.00 820205 9110 STANDARD DRYWALL INC 7/16/2026 $ 658.94
820206 0110 STANDARD PLUMBING SUPPLY DBA FLOYDS 7/16/2026 $ 521.26 820207 4210 STARS AND STRIPES 7/16/2026 $ 2,330.00
820208 0120 Stephen A George 7/16/2026 $ 558.67
820209 5110 SUBURBAN PROPANE 7/16/2026 $ 1,585.44
820210 4310 SUNSHINE CLEANING SERVICES 7/16/2026 $ 950.00 820211 0140 SURVEILLANCE INTEGRATION 7/16/2026 $ 1,631.28 820212 0110 T-MOBILE USA 7/16/2026 $ 860.00
820213 0110 TATES JANITORIAL SERVICE 7/16/2026 $ 5,000.00 820214 4120 TEL TEC SECURITY SYSTEM INC 7/16/2026 $ 315.00 820215 5110 TEMPORARY 123 INC 7/16/2026 $ 5,885.00
820216 5110 TEN EIGHT TOW INC 7/16/2026 $ 50.00
820217 0140 THE DOLLHOUSE 7/16/2026 $ 2,286.77
820218 6110 THE LAW OFFICE OF SJ ADELSON APC - REFU 7/16/2026 $ 275.00 820219 1110 THE MISSION AT KERN COUNTY 7/16/2026 $ 21,667.70 820220 0140 THE NATELSON DALE GROUP INC 7/16/2026 $ 3,400.00 820221 1120 THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK 7/16/2026 $ 132,977.04 820222 4210 TOTER LLC 7/16/2026 $ 138,097.20
820223 0110 TREK DIGITAL PRODUCTS INC 7/16/2026 $ 1,819.40 820224 4210 TRINITY CONSULTANTS 7/16/2026 $ 8,093.27
820225 5110 TRINITY SAFETY COMPANY 7/16/2026 $ 162.00
820226 0110 U.S. BEHAVIORAL HEALTH PLAN 7/16/2026 $ 1,565.79 820227 0110 UNIVERSAL BACKGROUND SCREENING INC 7/16/2026 $ 958.82 820228 1170 UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES INC 7/16/2026 $ 32,478.30 820229 4120 USABLUEBOOK 7/16/2026 $ 1,569.49
820230 4210 USP TECHNOLOGIES 7/16/2026 $ 4.17
820231 0140 VALLEY PRESSURE PROS INC 7/16/2026 $ 13,620.00 820232 5110 VBI PAINTING 7/16/2026 $ 5,426.21
820233 0110 VENTURI ENTERPRISES INC 7/16/2026 $ 4,825.00 820234 5110 VERITONE INC 7/16/2026 $ 50,700.00
820235 1740 VERIZON WIRELESS 7/16/2026 $ 2,108.95
820236 3120 VERTEX ONE SOFTWARE LLC 7/16/2026 $ 14,613.04 820237 5110 VOLVO CONSTRUCTION EQ & SVC INC 7/16/2026 $ 608.80 820238 4120 VWR INTERNATIONAL 7/16/2026 $ 335.92
820239 5110 WEST MARK SERVICE CENTERS 7/16/2026 $ 4,045.94 820240 5110 WESTCOAST HYDRAULICS 7/16/2026 $ 11.13
820241 4110 WINSTON WATER SERVICES 7/16/2026 $ 845.00
820242 4120 WITCHER ELECTRIC INC 7/16/2026 $ 32,560.95
820243 9110 WM-FIRESTONE "STINE" 7/16/2026 $ 1,430.95
820244 9110 WM-WALMART "ALLEN" 7/16/2026 $ 936.97
820245 9110 WM-WALMART "FASHION PL" 7/16/2026 $ 4,341.03 820246 9110 WOOD MASTERS CONSTRUCTION INC 7/16/2026 $ 1,097.31 820247 5110 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 7/16/2026 $ 3,679.08 9998589 0110 CARD CHAMP 7/9/2026 $ 15.00
9998590 4610 U S BANK 7/9/2026 $ 5,119.66
9998591 0110 VERMONT SYSTEMS 7/9/2026 $ 2,637.08
S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2026\COUNCIL - ADMIN\8.5.26\ 7/22/2026 ORACLE CHECK REGISTER
FROM 07/01/2026 TO 07/21/2026
PAGE 13
Payment
Number Fund Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
9998593 0110 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 7/16/2026 $ 4,684.80 819589 5210 AIMS C/O FLOYD SKEREN MANUKIAN LANGEVIN 7/2/2026 $ 1,387.50 819590 5210 AIMS C/O HANNA BROPHY MACLEAN 7/2/2026 $ 1,448.60 819594 5210 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES, INC 7/2/2026 $ 14,490.00 819597 5210 AMS LEGAL SUPPORT SERVICES INC 7/2/2026 $ 19.90 819600 5210 AUTHORITY FOR CALIFORNIA CITIES EXCESS 7/2/2026 $ 8,987,924.89 819665 5210 FEDEX 7/2/2026 $ 121.77
819683 5210 HANNA BROPHY MACLEAN MCALEER & JENSEN L 7/2/2026 $ 630.00 819687 5210 HELEN L CASON 7/2/2026 $ 360.00
819722 5210 MEMORIAL OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE 7/2/2026 $ 2,927.00 819741 5210 PRISM 7/2/2026 $ 3,821,679.00
819766 5210 TREK DIGITAL PRODUCTS INC 7/2/2026 $ 619.26 819842 5210 Carlos Ortiz 7/9/2026 $ 160.00
819854 5210 Fernando G Madrigal 7/9/2026 $ 160.00
819858 5210 Flavio I Amado 7/9/2026 $ 160.00
819864 5210 Gloria I Osornia 7/9/2026 $ 146.14
819877 5210 Jennifer K Montes 7/9/2026 $ 129.90
819896 5210 MEMORIAL OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE 7/9/2026 $ 4,795.00 819903 5210 PATRICIA GARCIA 7/9/2026 $ 3,250.00
819920 5210 Stephen A George 7/9/2026 $ 159.24
819944 5210 DOWNTOWN LA LAW GROUP CLIENT TRUST ACCO 7/16/2026 $ 25,000.00 820031 5210 AIMS C/O HANNA BROPHY MACLEAN 7/16/2026 $ 1,395.00 820032 5210 AIMS C/O YRULEGUI & ROBERTS APC 7/16/2026 $ 536.50 820039 5210 AMS LEGAL SUPPORT SERVICES INC 7/16/2026 $ 9.95 820128 5210 Katherine M Patty 7/16/2026 $ 152.99
820166 5210 PRISM 7/16/2026 $ 78,624.00
820169 5210 PURPOSE BUILT TRADE CO 7/16/2026 $ 2,033.25 9998587 5210 WELLS FARGO BANK 7/2/2026 $ 346,031.79
9998588 5210 CALPERS 7/9/2026 $ 118,409.20
9998592 5210 WELLS FARGO BANK 7/9/2026 $ 98,419.42
9998594 5210 WELLS FARGO BANK 7/16/2026 $ 165,554.52
$ 27,232,077.98
S:\Accounting\LACEY\ADMIN-COUNCIL\2026\COUNCIL - ADMIN\8.5.26\

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 5, 2026 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent – Payments and Agreements TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Randy McKeegan, Finance Director
DATE: July 22, 2026
SUBJECT: Receive and file department agreements over $40,000 and under $100,000 between July 01, 2026 and July 21, 2026.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends receiving and filing the report
BACKGROUND:

In accordance with Bakersfield Municipal Code Chapter 3.20 the Finance Director must report other financial reports required to indicate the financial condition of the city periodically to the City Council. In conjunction with changes to Bakersfield Municipal Code Section 3.20, an informational report was requested to provide documentation of contracts between $40,000 and $100,000 to increase transparency and measure the effectiveness of the changes in contract authority threshold amounts.

FISCAL IMPACT:
$1,012,476.82
COUNCIL GOAL:

Innovative and Efficient City Government
ATTACHMENTS:

Department Agreement Report 8.05
Document Number Name Subject Amount Date Miscellaneous Information DS26-025
Daves All n One Cleaning
and Hauling Services Inc
Abate violation on property $40,000.00 7/15/2026
DS26-028
LD Maintenance &
Construction
Abate violation on property $40,000.00 7/15/2026
PW24-071 (2)
Sierra International
Machinery
Continue to provide training to city staff on contractors equipment
$40,000.00 7/21/2026
WR26-033
Gold Coast
Environmental
to calibrate and troubleshoot flow meters for the wastewater division
$40,000.00 7/10/2026
CM26-033
Bakersfield Symphony
Orchestra Inco
City shall make a one time contribution to recipient $50,000.00 7/21/2026 2024-297 CCO6 WM Lyles Co. Wastewater Treatment Plant no 3 digester gas booster $52,476.82 7/15/2026 CA26-009
Accelerated Resolutions
Inc
Act as a hearing officer at various personnel hearing per hour/as needed basis
$60,000.00 7/14/2026
WR25-032 (1)
Healthy Fresh Janitorial
Clean
Provide routine janitorial services for the wastewater division $90,000.00 7/17/2026 CA26-010 Duane Morris General Misc Issues $100,000.00 7/14/2026 DS26-024
TC Welding &
Fabrication Inc
Abate violation on property $100,000.00 7/15/2026
DS26-026
Alpine Christmas Trees
Llc
Abate violation on property $100,000.00 7/15/2026
DS26-027
A1 Precision Builders
Management Inc
Abate violation on property $100,000.00 7/15/2026
PW22-112(4) Provost & Pritchard Consulting services for SW $100,000.00 7/13/2026 CA26-008
Colantuono Highsmith &
Whatley
Attorney Retainer for County Kern V. COB $100,000.00 7/1/2026 $1,012,476.82

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 5, 2026 AGENDA CATEGORY: Consent Ordinances TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Phillip Burns, Development Services Director
DATE: July 24, 2026
SUBJECT: First reading of an ordinance - Zone Change NO. 26-0001 amending Bakersfield Municipal Code Section 17.06.020by changing the official zoning classification from R-2/PUD (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling/Planned Unit Development) to R-2 (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling) zone on 20.56 acres, generally located on the westside of Old River Road, approximately 700 feet north of Panama Lane. Use of previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed. The applicant is McIntosh & Associates, Inc., representing Old River Properties, LLC (property owner). (ZC 25-0001) (Ward 5) RECOMMENDATION:

Staff and the Planning Commission recommend first reading of the Ordinance approving the change in zone classification from R-2/PUD to R-2, and use of a previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration.

BACKGROUND:

The proposed zone change from R-2/PUD (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling/Planned Unit Development) to R-2 (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling) zone on 20.56 acres is intended to facilitate the future residential development of 137 lots as part of Tentative Tract Map No. 7432. The Planning Commission will have the opportunity to consider the tentative tract map at a later hearing date.

In 2024, the developer was granted the approval of Zone Change No. 23-0287, intending to construct a residential community consisting of 134 dwelling units and a recreational facility on one large parcel. The community could have resulted in several types of residential units, such as apartments, townhomes, and standalone houses. Thus, the PUD overlay was an appropriate addition to ensure development standards were met, and Planning Commission could consider the development.

Since then, the developer has decided to process a tract map consisting of 137 lots, reflecting the City of Bakersfield’s updated General Plan Housing Element and comprehensive zoning ordinance update.

Consistency with the R-2 zone district requires the dwelling unit density to remain between 6.1 and thirteen dwelling units per net acres, which also maintains consistency with the General Plan designation of LR (Low Density Residential). The updated proposed R-2 development will maintain approximately 6.7 dwelling units per acre.

If the zone change is successfully approved the zone residential density will remain the same. Removing the PUD overlay zone will streamline the permitting process by eliminating the discretionary review process before the Planning Commission and replace it with the ministerial site plan review process consistent with the newly adopted 6th Cycle Housing Element 2023-2031.

Site History and Environmental Review
 July 28, 1993 – City Council approved Zone Change No. 5432 to change the zone classification from A-20A (Agriculture – 20 acre minimum) to R-1 (Single-Unit Dwelling). (Ordinance No. 3549).  May 22, 2024 – City Council approved Zone Change No. 23-0287 to change the zone classification from R-1 (Single-Unit Dwelling) to R-2/PUD (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling/Planned Unit Development). (Ordinance No. 5177). A Mitigated Negative Declaration was considered and adopted. (Resolution No. 11-24).
 June 4, 2026 – The Planning Commission recommended to your Council to approve this Zone Change No. 26-0001 from R-2/PUD (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling/Planned Unit Development) to R-2 (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling) (Resolution No. 52-26).

A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was previously adopted by your City Council for Zone Change No. 23-0287 on May 4, 2024, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). No new significant impacts, nor substantial increase in severity of impacts will result with the proposed Zone Change No. 26-0001 from those previously identified in Zone Change No. 23-0287. In accordance with CEQA Section 15162, no further environmental documentation is necessary because no substantial changes to the original project are proposed, there are no substantial changes in circumstances under which the project will be undertaken, and no new environmental impacts have been identified. The lead agency has determined that the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration by Resolution No. 11- 24 (SCH No. 2024010882) is applicable to this Zone Change No. 26-0001.

Updated technical memorandum completed for air quality (Trinity Consultants, November 26, 2925) and Biological Resource Evaluation (Pruett Biological Resource Consulting, January 27, 2025) determined that the proposed project would not result in any new significant environmental impacts. The previously adopted mitigation measures adequately address air quality and biological impacts, and no new information was provided from the updated studies. Accordingly, the lead agency has determined that mitigation from the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration document is adequate, and the updated studies are considered a minor technical change pursuant to CEQA Section 15162.

Public Notification
Public notice forthe proposed project and environmental determination was advertised in The Bakersfield Californian and posted on the bulletin board in the City of Bakersfield City Hall North, 1600 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California. All property owners within 300 feet of the project site were notified by United States Postal Service mail regarding the Planning Commission’s public hearing in accordance with city ordinance and state law. Signs are required as part of the public notification process and must be posted between 20 to 60 days prior to the Planning Commission hearing and remain posted until the City Councils final action. Photographs of the posted signage and the Declaration of Posting Public Hering Notice signed by the applicant are on file at the Planning Division. As of this writing, no written public comments have been received.

Planning Commission Action
The project was considered by Planning Commission on June 4, 2026. The commission unanimously voted in favor of the zone change from R-2/PUD (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling/Planned Unit Development) to R-2 (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling) to approve the project and recommend the same to City Council. The Planning Commission’s findings are contained in Resolution No. 52-26.

Consistency with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance
The proposal is consistent with land use goals and policies as contained in the General Plan relating to residential development. Any future development proposed on the project site will be required to undergo a Site Plan Review, ensuring consistency with City development standards as put forth in the Zoning Ordinance. In summary, due to the fact the project has been found to be consistent with General Plan policies and City Zoning Ordinance requirements. City staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve Zone Change No. 25-0001 FISCAL IMPACT:

The action to approve a zone change has incurred staff time and other resources, the developer has paid fees to cover staff time and other resources, the impact to the City General Fund is minimal.

COUNCIL GOAL:

Community Character & Quality of Life
Reliable Infrastructure
ATTACHMENTS:

1. City Council Ordinance for Zone Change No. 26-0001

2. Attachment A: Map Set
 Aerial
 Zone Classification
 General Plan Designation

3. Attachment B: Mitigated Negative Declaration, previous  Air Quality Memorandum
 Biological Resources Evaluation
 Resolution No. 11-24 (Zone Change No. 23-0287)

4. Attachment C: Planning Commission Resolution No. 52-26 (To Approve Zone Change No. 26-0001)

5. Attachment D: Planning Commission Staff Report

Page 1 of 2 ends

ORDINANCE NO. ______

AN ORDINANCE OF THE BAKERSFIELD CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO TITLE 17 OF THE BAKERSFIELD

MUNICIPAL CODE TO CHANGE THE ZONE CLASSIFICATION

LOCATED ON THE WESTSIDE OF OLD RIVER ROAD
APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET NORTH OF PANAMA LANE (ZONE
CHANGE NO. 26-0001).

WHEREAS, McIntosh & Associates, Inc. (applicant) representing Old River Properties, LLC (property owner), is requesting an amendment to Title 17 of the Bakersfield Municipal Code to change the zone district from R-2/PUD (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling/Planned Unit Development) to R-2 (Small Lot Single-Unit Dwelling) on 20.56 acres located on the westside of Old River Road approximately 700 feet north of Panama Lane, as shown in attached Exhibit “A,” (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 4, 2026, and with no one wishing to speak in support or opposition, approved Resolution No. 52-26, which recommended that the City Council approve the Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration previously adopted for the Project (Zone Change No. 23-0287; Resolution No. 11-24). No new significant impacts, nor substantial increase in severity of impacts will result with the proposed Zone Change No. 26-0001 from those previously identified in Zone Change No. 23-0287; and
WHEREAS, the Clerk of the City Council set Wednesday, August 5, 2026 at 5:15 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California, as the time and place for consideration before the City Council to consider the proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered all facts, testimony, and evidence concerning the Project, including the staff report, previous Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Planning Commission’s deliberation, and action; and WHEREAS, the Project is consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan.

SECTION 1.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Bakersfield City Council as follows:

1. The above recitals, incorporated herein, are true and correct.

2. The Planning Commission's findings as contained in its Resolution No. 52-26 are hereby adopted.

3. The Project is subject to mitigation measures found in the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project.

Page 2 of 2 ends

4. The Project is hereby approved incorporating the change into the official zoning map as described in Bakersfield Municipal Code Section 17.06.020 located on the map as shown in Exhibit A and as specifically described in Exhibit B, all of which are incorporated herein.

SECTION 2.

This ordinance must be posted in accordance with the Bakersfield Municipal Code and will become effective not less than 30 days from and after the date of its passage. ---------o0o---------
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was passed and adopted, by the Council of the City of Bakersfield at a regular meeting thereof held on ______________________________ by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBER ARIAS, GONZALES, WEIR, SMITH, KOMAN, BASHIRTASH, KAUR NOES: COUNCILMEMBER _______________________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBER _______________________________________________________________ ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER ______________________________________________________________ _ ________________________________

JULIE DRIMAKIS, MMC
CITY CLERK and Ex Officio Clerk of
the Council of the City of Bakersfield
APPROVED: _________________
By __________________________

KAREN GOH
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

VIRGINIA GENNARO, CITY ATTORNEY
By: ____________________________

VIRIDIANA GALLARDO-KING
Deputy City Attorney
Exhibits: A Zone Change Map
B Legal Description
AM/S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2026\ZC-26-0001_NW Panama and Old River_R-2PUD to R-2\01 Hearing and NOPH\CC\First Reading\2. CC ZC 26-0001Ordinance rpn_jeng edits.docx MapPackages_KA
0 500 1,000
Feet
_
R-1
C-2
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-5
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-2
R-1
R-1
R-1
C-2/P.C.D.

R-1
R-1
R-1
R-2/P.U.D.

R-1
R-1
R-1
C-2
R-1
A
R-1
R-1 R-1
R-1
MX-1

EMPIRE STATE DR
C
L
E
ARWA
T
E
R

CREEK WAY

HARRIS RD

LANCASTER AVE

OLD RIVER RD

SIRRETTA PEAK PL
FIJI
DR

SENTINEL PEAK PL
LASSEN
PEAK
WAY

GIULIANI
WAY

SCATENA
ISLE
DR

ONYX PEAK LN
VOY
A
GEURS
D
R

SALSBERRY
P
EA
K
WAY

SHARKTOOTH PEAK DR ACTON CT

BUCKHORN PEAK DR

LIBERTY ISLAND DR

DAVIS BRIDGE AVE

MUSTANG PEAK
DR
GOTHAM
WAY

METROPOLITAN WAY

PROSPECT

PEAK WAY

GRIZZLY PEAK DR

HOCKETT
PEAK
WAY

HORSETAIL

CREEK CT

FORT HENRY WAY

CARRIAGE

CREEK CT

CONEY ISLAND DR

NIAGARA

FALLS C
T

TIMES SQUARE

MONAHAN ST

PANAMA LN

MOONLIGHT

PEAK DR
P
ENN
STATI
O
N
L
N

MARIPOSA

PEAK WA
Y

THIMBLE

PEAK WAY
D
O
GTOOTH

PEAK WAY
OW
E
N
S

PEAK WAY

BRONX WAY

DUTCHMAN PEAK LN

CORDELL WAY MURFREESBORO DR

PANAMA DITCH
Zone Change
26-0001

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
Zoning
R-1 Single-Unit Dwelling
6,000 sq.ft. min lot size
R-1-4.5 One Family Dwelling
4,500 sq.ft. min lot size
E Estate
10,000 sq.ft. min lot size
R-S Residential Suburban
24,000 sq.ft./dwelling unit
R-S-( ) Residential Suburban
1, 2.5, 5 or 10 min lot size
R-2 Limited Multiple Family
Dwelling
4,500 sq.ft. min lot size (single
family)
6,000 sq.ft. min lot size
(multifamily)
2,500 sq.ft. lot area/dwelling
unit
R-3 Multiple Family Dwelling
6,000 sq.ft. min lot size
1,250 sq.ft. lot area/dwelling
unit
R-4 High Density Multiple Family
Dwelling
6,000 sq.ft. min lot size
600 sq.ft. lot area/dwelling
unit
R-H Residential Holding
20 acre min lot size
A Agriculture
6,000 sq.ft. min lot size
A-20A Agriculture
20 acre min lot size
PUD Planned Unit Development
TT Travel Trailer Park
MH Mobilehome
C-O Professional and
Administrative Office
C-1 Neighborhood Commercial
C-2 Regional Commercial
C-C Commercial Center
C-B Central Business
PCD Planned Commercial
Development
M-1 Light Manufacturing
M-2 General Manufacturing
M-3 Heavy Industrial
P Automobile Parking
RE Recreation
Ch Church Overlay
OS Open Space
HOSP Hospital Overlay
AD Architectural Design Overlay
FP-P Floodplain Primary
FP-S Floodplain Secondary
AA Airport Approach
DI Drilling Island
PE Petroleum Extraction
Combining
SC Senior Citizen Overlay
HD Hillside Development
Combining
WM- West Ming Specific Plan
ZC-26-0001
R-2/PUD to R-2
3/31/2026
Exhibit A
Exhibit B

MAP SET
MapPackages_KA
0 500 1,000
Feet
_
AERIAL

MALDIVES WAY

EMPIRE STATE DR
C
L
E
A
R
W
A
T
E
R
C
R
E
E
K
W
A
Y

HARRIS RD

LANCASTER AVE

OLD RIVER RD

SIRRETTA PEAK PL
FIJI
DR

SENTINEL PEAK PL
LASSEN
PEAK
WAY

GIULIANI
WAY
S
C
A
T
E
N
A
IS
L
E
D
R

ONYX PEAK LN
V
O
Y
A
G
E
U
R
S
D
R

SALSBERRY
P
E
A
K
WAY

SHARKTOOTH PEAK DR ACTON CT

BUCKHORN PEAK DR

LIBERTY ISLAND DR

DAVIS BRIDGE AVE

MUSTANG PEAK
DR
GOTHAM
WAY

METROPOLITAN WAY
P
R
O
S
P
E
C
T
P
E
A
K
W
A
Y

GRIZZLY PEAK DR

HOCKETT
PEAK
WAY

HORSETAIL

CREEK CT
F
O
R
T
H
E
N
R
Y
W
A
Y

CARRIAGE

CREEK CT

CONEY ISLAND DR
NIA
G
A
R
A
F
A
L
L
S
C
T

TIMES SQUARE

MONAHAN ST

PANAMA LN
M
O
O
N
LIG
H
T
P
E
A
K
D
R
P
E
N
N
S
T
A
TIO
N
L
N
M
A
RIP
O
S
A
P
E
A
K
W
A
Y
T
HIM
B
L
E
P
E
A
K
W
A
Y
D
O
G
T
O
O
T
H
P
E
A
K
W
A
Y
O
W
E
N
S
P
E
A
K
W
A
Y

BRONX WAY

DUTCHMAN PEAK LN

CORDELL WAY MURFREESBORO DR

PANAMA DITCH
Zone Change
26-0001

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
ZC-26-0001
R-2/PUD to R-2
3/31/2026
MapPackages_KA
0 500 1,000
Feet
_
R-2
A
C-2/P.C.D. C-2
C-2
R-2/P.U.D.

R-5
MX-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1
R-1 R-1 R-1
R-1

EMPIRE STATE DR
C
L
E
A
R
W
A
T
E
R
C
R
E
E
K
W
A
Y

HARRIS RD

LANCASTER AVE

OLD RIVER RD

SIRRETTA PEAK PL
FIJI
DR

SENTINEL PEAK PL
LASSEN
PEAK
WAY

GIULIANI
WAY

SCATENA
ISLE
DR

ONYX PEAK LN
V
O
Y
A
G
E
U
R
S
D
R

SALSBERRY
P
E
A
K
WAY

SHARKTOOTH PEAK DR ACTON CT

BUCKHORN PEAK DR

LIBERTY ISLAND DR

DAVIS BRIDGE AVE

MUSTANG PEAK
DR
GOTHAM
WAY

METROPOLITAN WAY
P
R
O
S
P
E
C
T
P
E
A
K
W
A
Y

GRIZZLY PEAK DR

HOCKETT
PEAK
WAY

HORSETAIL
CREEK
CT
F
O
R
T
H
E
N
R
Y
W
A
Y

CARRIAGE

CREEK CT

CONEY ISLAND DR
NIA
G
A
R
A
F
A
L
L
S
C
T

TIMES SQUARE

MONAHAN ST

PANAMA LN
M
O
O
N
LIG
H
T
P
E
A
K
D
R
P
E
N
N
S
T
A
TIO
N
L
N
M
A
RIP
O
S
A
P
E
A
K
W
A
Y
T
HIM
B
L
E
P
E
A
K
W
A
Y
D
O
G
T
O
O
T
H
P
E
A
K
W
A
Y
O
W
E
N
S
P
E
A
K
W
A
Y

BRONX WAY

DUTCHMAN PEAK LN

CORDELL WAY MURFREESBORO DR

PANAMA DITCH
Zone Change
26-0001

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
Zoning
Commercial Zone Designations
C-2 Regional Commercial
C-2/P.C.D. Combining
Resource Zone Designations
A Agricultural
Residential Zone Designations
R-1 Single-Unit Dwelling
R-2 Limited Multiple
Family Dwelling Zone - 1
unit/2,500 sq. ft.

R-2/P.U.D. Combining
ZC-26-0001
R-2/PUD to R-2
3/31/2026
MapPackages_KA
0 500 1,000
Feet
_
LR

LR GC LR LR
R-IA
LR
LR
LR
GC
LR
LR
LR
LR
LR
LR
LR
LR
LR
LR
LR
LR
LR
LR
LR
LR
LMR
GC
LR
LR
GC
LR
LR
LR
LR
LR
LR
LR
LR
LR
LR

EMPIRE STATE DR
C
L
E
A
R
W
A
T
E
R
C
R
E
E
K
W
A
Y

HARRIS RD

LANCASTER AVE

OLD RIVER RD

SIRRETTA PEAK PL
FIJI
DR

SENTINEL PEAK PL
LASSEN
PEAK
WAY

GIULIANI
WAY

SCATENA
ISLE
DR

ONYX PEAK LN
V
O
Y
A
G
E
U
R
S
D
R

SALSBERRY
P
E
A
K
WAY

SHARKTOOTH PEAK DR ACTON CT

BUCKHORN PEAK DR

LIBERTY ISLAND DR

DAVIS BRIDGE AVE

MUSTANG PEAK
DR
GOTHAM
WAY

METROPOLITAN WAY
P
R
O
S
P
E
C
T
P
E
A
K
W
A
Y

GRIZZLY PEAK DR

HOCKETT
PEAK
WAY

HORSETAIL

CREEK CT
F
O
R
T
H
E
N
R
Y
W
A
Y

CARRIAGE

CREEK CT

CONEY ISLAND DR
NIA
G
A
R
A
F
A
L
L
S
C
T

TIMES SQUARE

MONAHAN ST

PANAMA LN
M
O
O
N
LIG
H
T
P
E
A
K
D
R
P
E
N
N
S
T
A
TIO
N
L
N
M
A
RIP
O
S
A
P
E
A
K
W
A
Y
T
HIM
B
L
E
P
E
A
K
W
A
Y
D
O
G
T
O
O
T
H
P
E
A
K
W
A
Y
O
W
E
N
S
P
E
A
K
W
A
Y

BRONX WAY

DUTCHMAN PEAK LN

CORDELL WAY MURFREESBORO DR

PANAMA DITCH
Zone Change
26-0001

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
Land Use

RESIDENTIAL
LMR - Low Medium Density
Residential: > 4 units but
≤ 10 dwelling units/net
acre
LR - Low Density
Residential: ≤ 7.26
dwelling units/net acre

COMMERCIAL
GC - General Commercial

RESOURCE
R-IA - Resource - Intensive
Agriculture: 20 acre
minimum parcel size
ZC-26-0001
R-2/PUD to R-2
3/31/2026
S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 1 of 34 ends

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The City of Bakersfield Development Services Department has completed an initial study (attached) of the possible environmental effects of the following-described project and has determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate. It has been found that the proposed project, as described and proposed to be mitigated (if required), will not have a significant effect on the environment. This determination has been made according to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Bakersfield’s CEQA Implementation Procedures.

PROJECT NO. (or Title): Zone Change 23-0287
COMMENT PERIOD BEGINS: January 29, 2024
COMMENT PERIOD ENDS: February 29, 2024
MITIGATION MEASURES (included in the proposed project to avoid potentially significant effects, if required):

Biological Resources Impact Mitigation Measures:

1. Prior to of ground disturbance and/or construction activities, applicant/developer shall consult with and follow all California Department of Fish and Wildlife and United States Fish and Wildlife Service requirements related to listed plant and animal species protected under the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) and the California Endangered Species Act (CESA).

2. Applicant/developer shall have a qualified professional conduct and prepare a biological resource pre-activity survey no more than 30 days prior to the beginning of ground disturbance and/or construction activities; biological resource monitoring during each initial phase of ground disturbance; compliance reporting provided to the required oversight agencies for all biological resource field surveys, monitoring, and additional tasks as warranted for the detection of listed, or otherwise special-status species, likely to be impacted by any project related activity.

2.1. If known or natal dens are detected during the survey, protective measures enumerated in the USFWS Standardized Recommendations for Protection of the Endangered San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior to or During Ground Disturbance (2011) shall be initiated. If the identified dens are unavoidable, pursuant to the guidelines, the CDFW and USFWS shall be contacted for additional guidance and take authorization.

2.2. The project is within the historic range of Tipton kangaroo rat. The project was not included in the southwest focus area for the species in the previous habitat conservation plan. The most recent habitat suitability modeling (Cypher 2020) does not include the project in any of the four tiers enumerated for suitability. Trapping would be required to confirm small mammal species occupying the project.

2.3. If ground-disturbing activities are planned during the nesting season for migratory birds that may nest on or near the site (generally February 1 through August 31), nesting bird surveys are recommended prior to the commencement of ground disturbance for project activities. If nesting birds are present, no new construction or ground S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 2 of 34 ends

disturbance should occur within an appropriate avoidance area for that species until young have fledged, unless otherwise approved and monitored by a qualified onsite biologist. Appropriate avoidance should be determined by a qualified biologist. In general, minimum avoidance zones for active nests should be implemented as follows: 1) ground or low-shrub nesting non-raptors – 300 feet (91 meters); 2) burrowing owl – as appropriate based on nest location, existing surrounding activity, and evaluation of owl behavior. Coordination with CDFW may be warranted. 3) other raptors – 500 feet (152 meters).

Tribal and Cultural Resources Impact Mitigation Measures:

3. During construction, if archaeological resources are encountered during the course of construction, a qualified archaeologist should be consulted for further evaluation.

4. During construction, if human remains are discovered, further ground disturbance shall be prohibited pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. and Public Resources Code Sections 5097.94, 5097.98 and 5097.99.

Traffic/Circulation Impact Mitigation Measures

5. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall pay the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Program.

2 2
LMR
S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 7 of 34 ends

INITIAL STUDY

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

1. Project (Title & No.): Zone Change 23-0287

2. Lead Agency (name and address): City of Bakersfield
Development Services Department
1715 Chester Avenue
Bakersfield, California 93301

3. Contact Person (name, title, phone): Courtney Camps, Associate Planner (661) 326-3070

4. Project Location: Near the northwest of Panama Lane and Old River Road

5. Applicant (name and address): McIntosh & Associates
P.O. Box 21687
Bakersfield, CA 93390

6. General Plan Designation: LR (Low Density Residential)

7. Zoning: Existing: R-1 (One-Family Dwelling)
Proposed: R-2 (Limited Multiple-Family Dwelling)

8. Description of Project (describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its implementation.):

McIntosh & Associates, representing Old River Properties, LLC (property owner), is proposing a Zone Change (ZC) on 20.56 acres located northwest of Panama Lane and Old River Road.

The request is a change in zone classification from R-1 (One-Family Dwelling) to R-2 (Limited Multiple-Family Dwelling). The purpose of the zone change is for increased density on the site.

The increased density will allow for multiple dwelling units to be constructed on a single parcel up to a density of 7.26 dwelling units per net acre, which may be up to 149 dwelling units.

9. Environmental setting (briefly describe the existing onsite conditions and surrounding land uses):

The project site consists of a vacant parcel of land. Adjacent properties to the south, east and west are vacant land. There is existing single-family residential development to the north of the project site.

10. Other public agencies whose approval is anticipated to be required (e.g., permits, financing approval or participation agreement):
• City of Bakersfield – Mitigated Negative Declaration consideration and adoption • City of Bakersfield – Building permits
• City of Bakersfield – Regional Transportation Impact Fee Program and Local Mitigation • San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District – Indirect Source Rule compliance • State Water Resources Control Board – National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General permit
S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 8 of 34 ends

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:

As indicated by the checklist on the following pages, the project would result in potentially significant impacts with respect to the environmental factors checked below (Impacts reduced to a less than significant level through the incorporation of mitigation are not considered potentially significant):

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

On the basis of this initial evaluation:
☐ I find that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment, and a negative declaration will be prepared.
☒ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A mitigated negative declaration will be prepared.
☐ I find that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, and an environmental impact report is required.
☐ I find that the proposed project may have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect has been (1) adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on the attached sheets. An environmental impact report is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ☐ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects have been (1) analyzed adequately in an earlier environmental impact report or negative declaration pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier environmental impact report or negative declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.

Signature Date
Courtney Camps, Associate Planner
Printed name
☐ Aesthetics ☐ Agriculture / Forestry
Resources
☐ Air Quality
☐ Biological Resources ☐ Cultural Resources ☐ Energy
☐ Geology and Soils ☐ Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
☐ Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
☐ Hydrology / Water Quality ☐ Land Use/Planning ☐ Mineral Resources ☐ Population / Housing ☐ Public Services ☐ Public Services ☐ Noise ☐ Transportation / Traffic ☐ Tribal Cultural Resources ☐ Wildfire ☐ Wildfire ☐ Mandatory Findings of
Significance
1/29/2024
S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 9 of 34 ends

EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as onsite, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4) “Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact.” The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, “Earlier Analyses,” may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration.

Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated,” describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used, or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant.

S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 10 of 34 ends

I. AESTHETICS:

Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project: Potentially Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcrops, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ c) In nonurbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES:

In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ III. AIR QUALITY:

Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 11 of 34 ends

IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES:

Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES:

Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outsides of dedicated cemeteries? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
VI. ENERGY:

Would the project:
a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS:

Would the project;
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map, issued by the State Geologist ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 12 of 34 ends

for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ iv. Landslides? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
VIlI. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS:

Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS:

Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code §65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY:

Would the project:

S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 13 of 34 ends

a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
i. Result in a substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ ii. Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
iii. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
iv. Impede or redirect flood flows? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING:

Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
XII. MINERAL RESOURCES:

Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be a value to the region and the residents of the state? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
XIII. NOISE:

Would the project result in:
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 14 of 34 ends

XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING:

Would the project;
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
XV. PUBLIC SERVICES:
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
i. Fire protection? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
ii. Police protection? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
iii. Schools? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
iv. Parks? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
v. Other public facilities? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
XVI. RECREATION:
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
XVII. TRANSPORTATION:

Would the project:
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines § 15064.3, subdivision (b)? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
d) Result in inadequate emergency access? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code § 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:

S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 15 of 34 ends

a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code § 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code § 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
XVIV. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ c) Result in a determination by the waste water treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
d) Generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
XX. WILDFIRES:

If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE:
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 16 of 34 ends

b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.)
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐

EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
I. AESTHETICS
a. Less-than-significant impact. The project is located within the City limits at Panama Lane and Old River Road in southwest Bakersfield. The existing visual environment in the area adjacent to the project is predominately vacant land with adjacent single family residential to the north of the site. The project does not conflict with any applicable vista protection standards, scenic resource protection requirements or design criteria of federal, state, or local agencies, and is consistent with the City of Bakersfield Zoning and, with the GPA, the project would be consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan (MBGP) designations for the project area. The project site is located within an area having slopes from 0 to 5 %. The area is not regarded or designated within the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan as visually important or “scenic.” The construction of multi-family residential at the site would be in character and compatible with existing urban land uses in the vicinity of the site and is a natural extension of the urban growth occurring in the project area. Therefore, the project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista.
b. No impact. There are no trees, rock outcrops, or historic buildings (Hudlow 2021) located at the project site. Additionally, the project is not located adjacent to or near any officially designated or potentially eligible scenic highways to be listed on the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) State Scenic Highway System. The closest section of highway eligible for state scenic highway designation is State Route (SR) 14 located in Kern County over 55 miles to the east. Therefore, the project would not substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcrops, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway.
c. No impact. Please refer to responses I.a, I.b and I.d. The project does not conflict with any applicable vista protection standards, scenic resource protection requirements or design criteria of federal, state, or local agencies and, the project would be consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan (MBGP) designations and Zoning Ordinance classifications for the project area. The area is not regarded or designated with in the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan as visually important or “scenic.” Therefore, the project would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings.
d. Less-than-significant impact. This project involves incremental urban growth within the City of Bakersfield’s jurisdiction. This project would have to comply with City development standards, including Title 17 (zoning ordinance), Title 15 (buildings and construction), as well as California Code of Regulations Title 24. Together, these local and state requirements oblige project compliance with current lighting and signage standards that minimize unwanted light or glare to spill over into neighboring properties. Therefore, the project would not create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area.

S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 17 of 34 ends

II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES
a. Less-than-significant impact. The 20.56-acre project site is designated as Grazing Land by the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (DOC 2020). The site is zoned R-1 and is currently fallow land not used for grazing. The project will not convert 100 acres or more of farmlands designated Prime, Unique, or of Statewide Importance to nonagricultural uses.

Large parcel size is, in general, an important indicator of potential agricultural suitability and productivity. CEQA Guidelines Section 15206 does not regard the cancellation of less than 100 acres of land from the Williamson Act to be of statewide, regional, or area wide significance. Therefore, the project would not significantly convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use. b. No impact. The project site is currently zoned R-1 (One Family Dwelling) and is not under a Williamson Act contract. Therefore, the project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract.
c. No impact. As discussed in II.b, the project site is zoned R-1. There are no forest lands located on the site. Therefore, the project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of forest land or timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production. d. No impact. Please refer to response II.c. Therefore, the project would not result in the loss of forestland or conversion of forest land to non-forest. e. Less-than-significant impact. Please refer to responses II.a through II.d. This project is in an area designated for urban development by the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan.

The project itself is typical of the development found in Metropolitan Bakersfield. Therefore, the project would not involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use.

III. AIR QUALITY
a. Less-than-significant impact. The project is located within the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) jurisdiction, in the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAB).

The SJVAB is classified by the state as being in severe nonattainment for the state 1-hour ozone standard as well as in nonattainment for the state particulate matter less than 10 microns (PM10) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5). The SJVAB is also classified as in extreme nonattainment for the federal 8-hour ozone standard, nonattainment for the federal PM2.5 standard, and attainment/maintenance for the federal carbon monoxide (CO) and PM10 standards.

Emission sources because of the project would include ground disturbance and other construction-related work as well as operational emissions typical of a residential development (e.g., predominantly emissions from personal vehicles traveling in and through the development).

The SJVAPCD encourages local jurisdictions to design all developments in ways that reduce air pollution from vehicles, which is the largest single category of air pollution in the San Joaquin Valley. The Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (GAMAQI) (SJVAPCD 2015) lists various land uses and design strategies that reduce air quality impacts of new development. Local ordinance and general plan requirements related to landscaping, sidewalks, street improvements, level of traffic service, energy efficient heating and cooling building code requirements, and location of residential development S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 18 of 34 ends

in proximity to other residential development are consistent with these listed strategies.

Regulation and policy that will result in the compliance with air quality strategies for new residential and commercial developments include, but are not limited to, Title 24 efficiency standards, Title 20 appliance energy efficiency standards, 2005 building energy efficiency standards, Assembly Bill (AB) 1493 motor vehicle standards, and compliance with the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan Air Quality Conservation Element as well as the SJVAPCD air quality guidelines and rules.

As shown in the following table, the SJVAPCD has established specific criteria pollutants thresholds of significance for the operation of specific projects.

SJVAPCD Significance Thresholds for Criteria Pollutants Air Pollutant Tons/Year
CO 100
Reactive Organic Gas (ROG) 10
Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) 10
Sulfur Oxides (SOX) 27
PM10 15
PM2.5 15
Source: Insight 2018.

Construction of the project would result in air pollutant emissions. Emissions from construction would result from fuel combustion and exhaust from equipment as well as vehicle traffic, grading, and the use of toxic materials (e.g., lubricants). The proposed project do not exceed the thresholds under The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (District) has published guidance for Small Project Analysis Levels (SPAL) Assessment.

Project operations would also result in air pollutant emissions but not exceed thresholds established by the SJVAPCD.
b. Less-than-significant impact. Under GAMAQI, any project that would have individually significant air quality impacts would also be considered to have significant cumulative air quality impacts. Impacts of local pollutants are cumulatively significant when the combined emissions from the project and other planned projects exceed air quality standards. As described above, the project does not pose a significant individual increase to estimated cumulative emissions for criteria pollutants in nonattainment within Kern County and the greater SJVAB. The project’s regional contribution to cumulative impacts would be negligible and therefore, the project’s contribution is not cumulatively considerable. Additionally, the project is subject to SJVAB Rules and Regulations. c. Less-than-significant impact. Those who are sensitive to air pollution include children, the elderly, and persons with pre‐existing respiratory or cardiovascular illness. The District considers a sensitive receptor a location that houses or attracts children, the elderly, people with illnesses, or others who are especially sensitive to the effects of air pollutants.

Examples of sensitive receptors include hospitals, residences, convalescent facilities, and schools. The closest off‐site sensitive receptors are existing residences to the north. The SPAL Assessment concluded that the project would not significantly affect such receptors. There is no evidence on the record that the project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.
d. Less-than-significant impact. There is no evidence on the record that the project would not emit any objectionable odors because the emitted odors would be typical of other S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 19 of 34 ends

residential development surrounding the project site. Therefore, the project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people.

IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
a. Less-than-significant with mitigation incorporated. A Biological Resource Evaluation was prepared for the project to document biological resources identified during a reconnaissance field study and identify potential impacts. The project site consists of 19.74 gross acres previously farmed in row crops. Historical imagery indicates the project site may have been taken out of production in about around 2006. Aerial imagery also shows the site and has since been regularly disced and maintained for vegetation control. However, no special status species or evidence of presence were observed during the site survey (Pruett Biological Resources Consulting, Inc. 2023). The project must comply with listed plant and animal species protected under the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) and the California Endangered Species Act (CESA), as directed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California State Department of Fish and Wildlife, respectively. Therefore, the project would result in a less than significant with mitigation incorporated on special status species.

Mitigation Measure 1 requires consultation and compliance with mitigation measures prior to ground disturbance for any special-status wildlife species that have the potential to occur at the project site. Mitigation Measure 2 requires a pre activity survey for kit fox, Tipton kangaroo rat and migratory birds in coordination with CDFW in the event that any are found onsite. With implementation of Mitigation Measures 1 and 2, the project would not have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by CDFW or USFWS. b. No Impact. There is no riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities located at the site. This project is also not located within, or adjacent to, the Kern River riparian habitat area. Therefore, the project would result in no impacts on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community.
c. No Impact. There are no wetlands, as defined by Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act, located at the project site, and no features identified as wetlands categories are found in the National Wetlands Inventory within the project site (United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 2021). Therefore, the project would result in no impacts on federally protected wetlands.
d. Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. The project site is isolated from natural area, is not within the Kern River floodplain.

There is the potential during construction to temporarily affect nursery sites such as dens and burrows. Project construction could cause the direct destruction of a nursery site or cause enough of an indirect disturbance to cause special-status wildlife to abandon a nursery site. However, Mitigation Measures 1 and 2 require preconstruction surveys and, if necessary, additional mitigation recommended by a qualified biologist and CDFW to reduce potential impacts to nursery sites. With the implementation of Mitigation Measures 1 and 2, the project would not interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with an established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites.

S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 20 of 34 ends

e. Less-than-significant Impact. The project site does not include biological resources that are protected by local policies. Therefore, the project would result in no impact on any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. f. Les-than-significant with mitigation incorporated. Please refer to response IV.e. With implementation of Mitigation Measures 1 and 2, the project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.

V. CULTURAL RESOURCES
a. No Impact. A Cultural Resources Assessment was prepared for the project to identify historic and cultural resources within the project site. A records search and field survey of the project site was conducted. No prehistoric or historical cultural resources were discovered during the field survey (Hudlow 2021). According to the Historic Buildings and Sites in Bakersfield Map, the project site does not include a historic building or site (City of Bakersfield 2022). Therefore, the project would not result in substantial adverse effects on historical resources.
b. Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. No archeological resources have been documented within the project site (Hudlow 2021). However, there is still the potential to unearth previously unknown archaeological resources at the site, and grading and other ground-disturbing activities have the potential to damage or destroy such resources.

Mitigation Measure 3 requires ceasing work and investigating any discovery in the event that previously unknown archaeological resources are unearthed during construction.

With the implementation of Mitigation Measure 3, the project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. c. Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. There are no known human remains found at the project site. The project could inadvertently uncover or damage previously unknown human remains. Mitigation Measure 4 requires that if any human remains are found at the site during construction, work would cease and the remains would be handled pursuant to applicable law. With implementation of Mitigation Measure 4, the project would not significantly disturb any human remains.

VI ENERGY
a. Less-than-significant impact. The project would comply with modern building standards, including California Code of Regulations Title 24, which outlines energy efficiency standards for new residential buildings to ensure that they do not wastefully, inefficiently, or unnecessarily consume energy.
b. Less-than-significant impact. There is no adopted plan by the City of Bakersfield for renewable energy or energy efficiency. As mentioned above, the project would comply with California Code of Regulations Title 24. Additionally, the City encourages applicants and developers to go beyond the required standards and make their developments even more efficient through programs such as LEED, or Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, which is a green building rating system that provides a framework to create healthy, highly efficient, and cost-saving green buildings. Other encouraged programs available to applicants and developers are Title 20 appliance energy efficiency standards and 2005 building energy efficiency standards. Therefore, the project would result in a less than significant impact on a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency.

S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 21 of 34 ends

VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
a. The following discusses the potential for the project to expose people or structures to substantial adverse effects because of various geologic hazards. The City is within a seismically active area. According to the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan, major active fault systems border the southern portion of the San Joaquin Valley. Among these major active fault systems include the San Andreas, Breckenridge-Kern County, Garlock, Pond Poso, and White Wolf faults. There are numerous additional smaller faults suspected to occur within the Bakersfield area, which may or may not be active. The active faults have a maximum credible Richter magnitude that ranges from 6.0 (Breckenridge-Kern County) to 8.3 (San Andreas). Potential seismic hazards in the planning area involve strong ground shaking, fault rupture, liquefaction, and landslides. a.i No impact. Ground rupture is ground deformation that occurs along the surface trace of a fault during an earthquake. The project site is not included within the boundaries of an “Earthquake Fault Zone” as defined in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act.

Therefore, the project would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving rupture of a known earthquake fault. a.ii Less-than-significant impact. The City is within a seismically active area. Future structures proposed on the project site are required by state law and City ordinance to be constructed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code (specifically Seismic Zone 4, which has the most stringent seismic construction requirements in the United States), and to adhere to all modern earthquake construction standards. Therefore, the project would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving strong seismic ground shaking.
a.iii Less-than-significant impact. The most common seismic-related ground failure is liquefaction and lateral spreading. In both cases, during periods of ground motion caused by an event such as an earthquake, loose materials transform from a solid state to nearliquid state because of increased pore water pressure. Such ground failure generally requires a high water table and poorly draining soils in order for such ground failure to occur. The potential for liquefaction at the project site is low. In addition, future structures proposed on the project site are required by state law and City ordinance to be constructed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, including those relating to soil characteristics. Therefore, the project would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction. a.iv No impact. In Kern County, the common types of landslides induced by earthquake occur on steeper slopes found in the foothills and along the Kern River Canyon; in these areas, landslides are generally associated with bluff and stream bank failure, rockslide, and slope slip on steep slopes. The project site is generally flat, there are no such geologic features located at the project site, and the site is not located near the Kern River Canyon.

Therefore, the project would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving landslides.
b. Less-than-significant impact. The project site’s soils have low-to-medium susceptibility to erosion by rainfall (USDA 2022). The relatively low precipitation in the project area [on average about 6 inches/year results in surface runoff that is intermittent and temporary in nature. The erosion potential at the site and the fact that the soils are well drained coupled with low average rainfall in the area does not make the project site susceptible to substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil.

S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 22 of 34 ends

Construction of the site would temporarily disturb soils, which could loosen soil, and the removal of vegetation could contribute to future soil loss and erosion by wind and storm water runoff. The project would have to request coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activities (No. 2012-0006-DWQ) (General Permit) because the project would result in 1 or more acres of ground disturbance. To conform to the requirements of the General Permit, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) would need to be prepared that specifies best management (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants, including eroded soils (such as topsoil), from moving offsite.

Implementation of the General Permit and BMPs requirements would mitigate erosion of soil during construction activities.

During operation, the soils would be sufficiently compacted to required engineered specifications, revegetated in compliance with City requirements, or paved over with impervious surfaces such that the soils at the site would not be particularly susceptible to soil erosion. Therefore, the project would not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil.
c. Less-than-significant impact. As discussed in VII.a.iii and VII.a.iv, the project site’s soils would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction, lateral spreading, or landslides.

Subsidence is part of the baseline condition in the project area due to historic groundwater pumping the resultant subsidence that occurs with such activities. The project would not substantially contribute to this baseline condition because the projected water use would be consistent with Cal Water’s 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) (Cal Water 2016), which takes into consideration sustainability of the groundwater basin and the need to reduce reliance on groundwater pumping in the future.

Future structures proposed on the project site are required by state law and City ordinance to be constructed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, including those relating to soil characteristics. Therefore, the project would not be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse.
d. Less-than-significant impact. When a soil has 35% or more clay content, it is considered a clayey soil. The project site consists of Kimberlina Urban Land-Cajon complex 0-2% slope soils type and Granoso 0-2% slope soils type. The typical profile for these soil types is fine sandy loam and alluvium with little clay content and therefore, do not have a high potential to be expansive. Additionally, future structures proposed on the project site are required by state law and City ordinance to be constructed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, including those relating to soil characteristics. Therefore, the project would not be located on expansive soil creating substantial risks to life or property. e. No impact. The project would not require the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal system. The project would hook up to existing City sewer in the area. Therefore, the project would not have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater.

S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 23 of 34 ends

f. Less-than-significant impact. Paleontological sensitivity is determined by the potential for a geologic unit to produce scientifically significant fossils. Because paleontological resources typically occur in the substratum soil horizon, surface expressions are often not visible during a pedestrian survey. Paleontological sensitivity is therefore derived from known fossil data collected from the entire geologic unit.

VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
a. Less-than-significant impact. Total greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) emissions generated during all phases of construction were combined and are presented in Table 4. The SJVAPCD does not recommend assessing the significance of construction‐related emissions. However, other jurisdictions, such as the South Coast Air Quality Management District and the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, have concluded that construction emissions should be included since they may remain in the atmosphere for years after construction is complete. In order to account for the construction emissions, amortization of the total emissions generated during construction were based on the life of the development (residential—30 years) and added to the operational emissions (Trinity Consultants 2021).

Total GHG emissions generated during operations are presented in Table 4. The project would result in a 42.9 percent reduction in emissions, meeting the goal set by Assembly Bill (AB) 32. By meeting the reduction goal set by AB 32 and through compliance with applicable local, state, and federal plans and policies, the project would not have a substantial adverse effect related to greenhouse gas emissions (Trinity Consultants 2021).

Table 4 Construction Emissions, Greenhouse Gases
MTCO2e Percent Reduction
2023 Project Operations 1,081.21 -
2005 Operational Emissions plus
Amortized Construction Emissions
1,892.62 -
Business as Usual Reduction - 42.9%
Source: (Trinity Consultants 2021)
Notes: MTCO2e =metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent b. Less-than-significant impact. The City of Bakersfield has not adopted a GHG reduction plan. In addition, the City has not completed the GHG inventory, benchmarking, or goal‐ setting process required to identify a reduction target and take advantage of the streamlining provisions contained in the CEQA Guidelines amendments adopted for Senate Bill (SB) 97 and clarifications provided in the CEQA Guidelines amendments adopted on December 28, 2018 (Trinity Consultants 2021).

The SJVAPCD has adopted a Climate Action Plan, but it does not include measures that are applicable to development projects. Therefore, the SJVAPCD Climate Action Plan cannot be applied to the project. Since no other local or regional Climate Action Plan is in place, the project is assessed for its consistency with Air Resources Board’s (ARB) adopted Scoping Plans. This would be achieved with an assessment of the project’s compliance with Scoping Plan measures contained in the 2008 Scoping Plan and the 2017 Scoping Plan Update (Trinity Consultants 2021).

S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 24 of 34 ends

IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
a. Less-than-significant impact. The project would not involve the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials as defined by the Hazardous Materials Transportation Uniform Safety Act. However, construction activities would require the transport, storage, use, and/or disposal of hazardous materials such as fuels and greases for the fueling/servicing of construction equipment, and there is the potential for upset and accident conditions that could release such material into the environment. Such substances would be stored in temporary storage tanks/sheds that would be located at the site. Although these types of materials are not acutely hazardous, they are classified as hazardous materials and create the potential for accidental spillage, which could expose construction workers. All transport, storage, use, and disposal of hazardous materials used in the construction of the project would be in strict accordance with federal and state laws and regulations. During construction of the project, Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for all applicable materials present at the site would be made readily available to onsite personnel. During construction, non-hazardous construction debris would be generated and disposed of at approved facilities for handling such waste. Also, during construction, waste disposal would be managed using portable toilets located at reasonably accessible onsite locations.

The project is the development of up to 135 duplex units and community center. Day-today activities in residences do not involve the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials as defined by the Hazardous Materials Transportation Uniform Safety Act. Maintenance of residences would require the transport, storage, use, and/or disposal of hazardous materials such as paints, cleaners, oils, batteries, and pesticides. Residential users should follow any instructions for use and storage provided on product labels carefully to prevent any accidents at home. Users should also read product labels for disposal directions to reduce the risk of products exploding, igniting, leaking, mixing with other chemicals, or posing other hazards on the way to a disposal facility. Additionally, residential hazardous waste can be dropped off at Metro Kern County Special Waste Facility located at 4951 Standard Street or at one-day hazardous waste collection events that take place throughout the year. Therefore, the project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials.
b. Less-than-significant impact. Please refer to response VIII.a. Therefore, the project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous material into the environment.
c. No impact. The closest school is Buena Vista Elementary School located just about 1.0 mile southwest of the site and Independence High School about 1.0 mile south of the site.

Therefore, the project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 0.25 miles of an existing or proposed school.
d. No impact. According to EnviroStor, no hazardous waste sites or materials are located within the project site (DTSC 2022). Therefore, the project would not result in a substantially adverse effect related to hazardous materials listed on Government Code 65962.5.

S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 25 of 34 ends

e. No impact. The project site is not located within the Kern County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan area (Kern County 2012). The closest airport to the project site is the Bakersfield Municipal Airport located about 9 miles to the southeast of the site. Therefore, the project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area for a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport. f. Less-than-significant impact. The project would not interfere with any local or regional emergency response or evacuation plans because the project would not result in a substantial alteration to the adjacent and area circulation system. The project is typical of urban development in Bakersfield and is not inconsistent with the adopted City of Bakersfield Hazardous Materials Area Plan (Bakersfield 1997). This plan identifies responsibilities and provides coordination of emergency response at the local level to hazardous materials incidents. Therefore, the project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.
g. Less-than-significant impact. The project site is not located within a “very high,” “high,” or “moderate” fire hazard severity zone. The site consists of developed and vacant land, and its vicinity is developed with residential land uses that do not possess high fuel loads that have a high potential to cause a wildland fire. The project site would be developed with hardscapes and irrigated landscaping, which would further reduce fire potential at the site. Therefore, the project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wild land fires, including where wild lands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wild lands.

X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
a. Less-than-significant impact. Construction would include ground disturbing activities. As discussed in VI.b, the project site’s soil types have a low-to-medium susceptibility to sheet and rill erosion by rainfall and a low susceptibility to wind erosion at the ground surface.

Disturbance of onsite soils during construction could result in soil erosion and siltation, and subsequent water quality degradation through increased turbidity and sediment deposition during storm events to offsite locations. Additionally, disturbed soils have an increased potential for fugitive dust to be released into the air and carried offsite. As described in VI.b, the project would be required to comply with the General Permit. To conform to the requirements of the General Permit, a SWPPP would need to be prepared that specifies BMPs to prevent construction pollutants from moving offsite. The project is required to comply with the General Permit because project-related construction activities would disturb at least 1 acre of soil.

The City owns and maintains a municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4). The project’s operational urban storm water discharges are covered under the Central Valley Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit and Waste Discharge Requirements General Permit for Discharges from Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (Order No. R5-2016-0040; NPDES No. CAS0085324) (MS4 Permit) (CVRWQCB 2016). The MS4 Permit mandates the implementation of a storm water management framework to ensure that water quality is maintained within the City as a result of operational storm water discharges throughout the City, including the project site.

By complying with the General Permit and MS4 Permit, the project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements.

S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 26 of 34 ends

b. Less-than-significant impact. Potable water from the project would be supplied by California Water Service (Cal Water). Cal Water provided a “Will Serve Letter” (Cal Water 2023) for the project, and therefore groundwater levels have already been accounted for in the UWMP with the project (a future entitlement). Therefore, the project would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level.
c.i Less-than-significant impact. The project site contains ephemeral channels that do not have connectivity to a jurisdictional waterway and discharge to land. The project site would be graded and, as a result, the internal drainage pattern at the site would be altered from the baseline condition. Additionally, the project would result in increased impervious surfaces (i.e., building pads, sidewalks, asphalt parking area, etc.) at the site, which would reduce percolation to ground and result in greater amounts of storm water runoff concentrations at the site. If uncontrolled, differences in drainage patterns and increased impervious surfaces could result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite.

However, the project would be required to comply with the General Permit during construction and MS4 permit during operation. In order to comply with the MS4 Permit, the City requires compliance with adopted building codes, including complying with an approved drainage plan, which avoids on- and offsite flooding, erosion, and siltation problems. Therefore, the project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite. c.ii Less-than-significant impact. Please refer to response IX.c.i Therefore, the project would not create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff.
c.iii Less-than-significant impact. Please refer to responses IX.a and IX.c.i. Therefore, the project would not create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff.
c.iv No Impact. The project site is located within an area designated Zone X (FEMA 2017), which is outside the 100-year flood hazard area. Therefore, the project would not place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map. d. No Impact. The project is not located near any ocean or an enclosed body of water and therefore, would not be subject to inundation by tsunami or seiche. A mudflow is a type of landslide where earth and surface materials are rapidly transported downhill under the force of gravity. As discussed in VII.a.iv, landslides, including mudflow, occur on steeper slopes in the foothills and along the Kern River Canyon. The project site is generally flat, there are no such geologic features located at the project site, and the site is not located near the Kern River Canyon. Therefore. The project site would not be inundated by seiche, tsunami, or mud flow.
e. Less-than-significant impact. Please refer to response X.c.i. There is currently no adopted groundwater management plan for the project site or its vicinity. Therefore, the project S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 27 of 34 ends

would result in a less than significant impact related to obstructing a water quality control plan or a sustainable groundwater management plan.

XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING
a. No impact. The project is a continuation of the existing urban development pattern of the City or is an infill development. The project is not a long and linear feature, such as a freeway, railroad track, block wall, etc., that would have the potential to divide a community. The project is the development of a finite 20.56-acre project site that does not impede existing or future movement or development of the City. Therefore, the project would not physically divide an established community.
b. No impact. The project is required to be consistent with the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan. The project is to change the zone district to a corresponding compatible zone with the General Plan Land Use designation. The record does not indicate that there are identified environment conflicts or inconsistencies with said policies or zoning regulations.

XII. MINERAL RESOURCES
a. No impact. The project site is not within the administrative boundaries of an oilfield and there are no oil wells found on the site (DOGGR 2022). The project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state.
b. No impact. The project site is currently designated LR (Low Density Residential). No portion of the site is designated for a potential mineral resource extraction use such as R-MP (Mineral and Petroleum). Therefore, the project would not result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site that is delineated in a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan.

XIII. NOISE
a. Less-than-significant impact. The project would generate noise during construction by the use of construction equipment. Typical construction equipment generates sound levels between 80 and 85 A-weighted decibels (dBA), which is a decibel system reflective of human hearing characteristics. At 80 to 85 dBA, the human response to such a sound level is annoyance and difficulty hearing conversation. Using the rule of thumb that noise attenuates 7.5 dBA per a doubling of distance away from the sound-emitting source, it would require 800 feet away from an 85-dBA sound-emitting source to obtain a 55 dBA sound level, which is considered “quiet” to the human ear. There are sensitive receptors (existing SFR) within 800 feet to the northeast of the project site. However, project construction would be limited to 6 a.m. and 9 p.m. on weekdays and 8 a.m. and 9 p.m. on weekends per Bakersfield Municipal Code Chapter 9.22 (Noise).

Project operations would generate sound levels typical of residential land uses and residents would have to comply with Bakersfield Municipal Code regarding noise.

Therefore, the project would not expose persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies.
b. Less-than-significant impact. Some groundborne vibration and noise would originate from earth movement and building activities during the project’s construction phase.

However, blasting, pile-driving, break-ramming, jackhammering, chipping, and other high S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 28 of 34 ends

impact-related construction activities that result in the creation of the greatest groundborne vibrations and noise levels would not occur as a consequence of the project.

Additionally, groundborne vibration and noise attenuates at a shorter distance than airborne noise. Operation of single- and multi-family residential would not result in appreciable groundborne vibration or noise. Therefore, the project would not expose persons to or generation of excessive ground-borne vibration or ground-borne noise levels. c. No impact. The project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels for a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport.

XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING
a. Less-than-significant impact. The project would accommodate population growth in this area through the development of new multi-family residential, and the project is the logical extension of existing urban development. The project would also require the extension of infrastructure. Therefore, the project would result in a less than significant impact on growth.
b. No impact. The project site consists of vacant land. Therefore, the project would not displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere.

XV. PUBLIC SERVICES
a.i Less-than-significant impact. Fire protection services for the Metropolitan Bakersfield area are provided through a joint fire protection agreement between the City and County. The project may necessitate the addition of fire equipment and personnel to maintain current levels of service, and this potential increase in fire protection services can be paid for by property taxes generated by this development. Therefore, the project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for fire protection.
a.ii Less-than-significant impact. Police protection will be provided by the Bakersfield Police Department upon project build out. Current City Police services standards require 1.09 officers for every 1,000 people in the City. However, this potential increase in services can be paid for by property taxes generated by this development. Therefore, the project would result in a less than significant impact on police protection performance objectives. a.iii Less-than-significant impact. The project is growth accommodating and therefore, is a driver for population growth, including the need for additional schools. The need for additional schools can be paid for by existing school impact fees and increased property tax revenues. Therefore, the project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for schools. a.ivLess-than-significant impact. The project is growth accommodating and therefore, is a driver for population growth, including the need for additional recreational opportunities.

S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 29 of 34 ends

However, residential projects follow the parkland requirements that are calculated based on the General Plan and City Ordinance park standards of 2.5 acres for every 1,000 people. Every residential unit must pay a park land development fee at the time of the issuance of building permits. Compliance with the park acreage dedication ordinance and the park development fee ordinance ensures that parks are dedicated and built in accordance with City standards to accommodate the increased population. Therefore, the project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for parks.
a.v Less-than-significant impact. The project and eventual buildup of this area would result in an increase in maintenance responsibility for the City. Though the project may necessitate increased maintenance for other public facilities, this potential increase can be paid for by property taxes generated by this development. Therefore, the project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for other public facilities.

XVI. RECREATION
a. Less-than-significant impact. Please refer to response XV.a.iv. Therefore, the project would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated.
b. Less-than-significant impact. Please refer to response XV.a.iv. Therefore, the project would not include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment.

XVII. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC
a. Less-than-significant with mitigation incorporated. The project would result in temporary construction-related traffic impacts. Construction workers traveling to and from the project site as well as construction material delivery would result in additional vehicle trips to the area’s roadway system. Construction material delivery may require a number of trips for oversized vehicles that may travel at slower speeds than existing traffic and, due to their size, may intrude into adjacent travel lanes. These trips may temporarily degrade level of service (LOS) on area roadways and at intersections. Additionally, the total number of vehicle trips associated with all construction-related traffic (including construction worker trips) could temporarily increase daily traffic volumes on local roadways and intersections.

The project may require temporary lane closures or the need for flagmen to safely direct traffic on roadways near the project site. However, once the project is built, it would not result in any permanent traffic-related effects.

Policy 36 of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan Circulation Element states:

Prevent streets and intersections from degrading below Level of Service “C” where possible due to physical constraints (as defined in a Level of Service standard) or when the existing Level of Service if below “C” prevent where possible further degradation S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 30 of 34 ends

due to new development or expansion of existing development with a three-part mitigation program: adjacent right-of-way dedication, access improvements and/or an area-wide impact fee. The area-wide impact fee would be used where the physical changes for mitigation are not possible due to existing development and/or the mitigation measure is part of a larger project, such as freeways, which will be built at a later date.

Policy 36 of the Circulation Element of the MBGP requires the City to prevent streets and intersections from degrading below a level of service C, where possible, through dedication of adjacent right-of-way, access improvements, or an area wide impact fee.

In addition, the Subdivision Ordinance requires all on-site street improvements and a proportional share of boundary street improvements to be built at the time the property is developed.

Mitigation Measure 5 requires that the applicant/developer participation in the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Program and the payment of Local Mitigation fees. With the implementation of this mitigation measure, the project would not conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system.
b. Less-than-significant with mitigation incorporated. Please refer to response XVII.a.

Therefore, the project would result in a less than significant impact related to CEQA section 15064.3, subdivision (b).
c. Less-than-significant impact. The project would have to comply with all conditions placed on it by the City Traffic Engineering Division in order to comply with accepted traffic engineering standards intended to reduce traffic hazards, including designing the roads so that they do not result in design feature hazards. The project is with the City limits and surrounded by compatible existing and planned land uses and land use designations.

Therefore, the project would not substantially increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses.
d. Less-than-significant impact. There may be the potential that, during the construction phase, the project would impede emergency access. For projects that require minor impediments of a short duration (e.g., pouring a new driveway entrance), the project would be required to obtain a street permit from City Public Works. If a project requires lane closures and/or the diversion of traffic, then a Traffic Control Plan would be required.

During operations, the project would have to comply with all applicable City policies and requirements to ensure adequate emergency access.

XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
a. Less-than-significant impact with mitigation incorporated. The Cultural Resources Assessment (Hudlow 2021) determined that there is no landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe located at the project site.

Additionally, no portion of the site is eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources or in a local register of historical resources (Hudlow 2021). However, in the event that any unknown resources are encountered, Mitigation Measure 3 and Mitigation Measure 4 would be implemented. Therefore, the project would result in a less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated on tribal cultural resources.

S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 31 of 34 ends

b. Less-than-significant impact with mitigation incorporated. See response XVII.a. above.

Therefore, the project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource that is determined by the lead agency to be significant.

XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
a. Less-than-significant impact. Refer to responses XIX.d and XIX.e. Therefore, the project would not require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects.
b. Less-than-significant impact. The Cal Water has provided a “Will Serve Letter” stating that water service can be supplied to the development (Cal Water 2022). The proposed development would not result in a need for significant additional systems or substantially alter the existing water utilities in the area. Therefore, the project would have sufficient water supplies available from existing entitlements and resources, and new or expanded entitlements would not be needed.
c. Less-than-significant impact. Wastewater as a result of the project would be treated at WWTP No. 2, which is owned and operated by the City. Based on previous analyses, it is assumed that average daily water demand per dwelling unit is 325 gallons. With 299 dwelling units for the project, the project’s average daily water demand would be 97,175 gpd [or 0.05 million gallons per day (MGD)] and therefore, it is assumed that wastewater capacity requirements to serve the project would also be 0.05 MGD. WWTP No. 2 has an overall capacity of 25 MGD with an average daily flow of 13.7 MGD. The current available capacity of 13.3 MGD (Bakersfield 2022). The project’s contribution would account for less than 0.5% of the available capacity and therefore, WWTP No. 2 has sufficient capacity to serve the project. As a result, it has been determined that wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments. d. Less-than-significant impact. It is assumed that solid waste generated as a result of the project would be disposed at the Bena Landfill located at 2951 Neumarkel Road, Bakersfield, CA 93307. The amount of solid waste generated by the project would be negligible. The project would be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs.
e. Less-than-significant impact. By law, the project would be required to comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations, including those relating to waste reduction, litter control, and solid waste disposal.

XX. WILDFIRE
a. Less-than-significant impact. Please refer to response IX.f. Therefore, the project would not substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.
b. Less-than-significant impact. Please refer to response IX.g. Additionally, the project site is relatively flat, not near wildlands, the site and its surrounding do not possess high fuel loads (i.e., lots of vegetation and other burnable material) to exacerbate wildfire risks and therefore, fire-related pollutant concentrations. Therefore, the project would not exacerbate wildfires and expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 32 of 34 ends

wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors.
c. Less-than-significant impact. Please refer to response XX.b above. d. Less-than-significant impact. Please refer to response XX.b above.

XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a. Less-than-significant with mitigated incorporated. The project must comply with listed plant and animal species protected under the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) and the California Endangered Species Act (CESA), as directed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California State Department of Fish and Wildlife, respectively. There are no important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory found at the site.

Therefore, the project with mitigation would not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number, or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory.
b. Less-than-significant impact. As described in the responses above, the project has no impacts that would be defined as individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. c. Less-than-significant impact with mitigation incorporated. As described in the responses above, with mitigation incorporated, the project would have less than significant impacts and environmental effects which would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.

BIBLIOGRAPHY/REFERENCE LIST

1. Bakersfield (City of Bakersfield). 1997. Hazardous Materials Area Plan. January.

2. Bakersfield. 1999. Proposed Subdivision & Engineering Design Manual. June.

3. Bakersfield. 2001. Metropolitan Bakersfield Habitat Conservation Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report.

4. Bakersfield. 2002. Bikeway Master Plan.

5. Bakersfield. 2013. City of Bakersfield Bicycle Transportation Plan. November.

6. Bakersfield 2016. Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report. Revised: January 20, 2016.

7. Bakersfield. 2017. Wastewater Treatment Plants.

8. City of Bakersfield. (2022, July 26). Historic Buildings and sites in Bakersfield. ArcGIS StoryMaps. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/eb1b154414724e1d8b39ef7ff1ee46a2

9. CalFire (Department of Forestry and Fire Protection). 2008. Draft Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA, Kern County.

S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 33 of 34 ends

10. Caltrans (California Department of Transportation). California State Scenic Highway Mapping System.

11. Cal Water (California Water Service),
https://www.calwater.com/docs/uwmp2020/BK_2020_UWMP_FINAL.pdf

12. Cal Water. Will Serve Letter, 2023.

13. CBOC (California Burrowing Owl Consortium). 1993. Burrowing Owl Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines. April.

14. CDFW. (2010, February). California Essential Habitat Connectivity Project. California, United States. Retrieved May 17, 2023, from
https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=18366&inline

15. DOC (Department of Conservation). 2018. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/

16. DOC (Department of Conservation Seismic Zones and soils https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/gmc/

17. 2020 Federal Census https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/bakersfieldcitycalifornia (2022).

18. CalGEM Well Finder. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/wellfinder , (2022).

19. DTSC (Department of Toxic Substance Control). 2017. EnviroStor. https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?myaddress=bakersfield%2C+ca

20. DWR (Department of Water Resources 2022)
https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?appid=SGMADataViewer#gwlevels

21. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2017. FEMA Flood Map Service Center:

Welcome! Available:<https://msc.fema.gov/portal>. Accessed: October 19, 2017.

22. Kern County. 2009. Lake Isabella Dam Failure Evacuation Plan.

23. Kern County. 2012. Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. November.

24. Kern County. 2017. Lake Isabella Flood Area.

25. SJVAPCD (San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District). 2022. Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts.

26. USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). Soil survey of Kern County, northeastern part, and southeastern part of Tulare County, California.
https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx

27. United States Fish and Wildlife Service. (2021, May 1). National Wetlands Inventory. United States. Retrieved May 17, 2023, from
https://fwsprimary.wim.usgs.gov/wetlands/apps/wetlands-mapper/ S:\15_Zone Change\01_Active\2023\23-60000287_6201 Old River Rd\03_CEQA\IS_MND_ZC_6201 Old River_2nd draft.docxx

Page 34 of 34 ends

28. Biological Resource Evaluation, Assessor's Parcel Map Number 544-040-07, County of Kern, Bakersfield, California, Pruett Biological Resource Consulting, December 12, 2023.

29. A Phase 1 Cultural Resource Survey of Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 12167, City of Bakersfield, California. Scott M. Hudlow, Hudlow Cultural Resource Associates, November 2021.

30. Small Project Analysis Level Assessment ,NWC Panama & Old River Multi-Family Residential SPAL, Trinity Consultants, December 2021.

MEMORANDUM
To: Krystal Lovett-Hernandez, RGF Properties, Inc.

From: Tiffany Wang, Trinity Consultants
Date: November 26, 2025
RE: VTTM 7432 Air Quality and GHG Impact Memo
Introduction
Trinity Consultants (‘Trinity’) was contracted to complete an air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) impact memorandum for the proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) 7432 project (Project) to be located at the cross streets of Old River Road and Panama Lane in Bakersfield, CA, which is within San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution District’s (SJVAPCD) jurisdiction.

The proposed Project’s construction would include the following criteria pollutant emissions: reactive organic gases (ROG), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and suspended particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5). Project operations would generate air pollutant emissions from mobile sources (vehicle activity from residents), energy sources, and area sources (incidental activities related to architectural coating and landscape maintenance). Project construction and operational activities would also generate GHG emissions.

Background
This memorandum provides a comparison of the air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts of the proposed Project with the previously completed NWC Panama & Old River Multi-Family Residential Small Project Analysis Level (SPAL) Assessment (‘Panama SPAL’). The Project will include 137 single family residences, while the Panama SPAL previously consisted of 135 single family residences. Due to the change in capacity, Trinity has conducted a new air quality analysis, GHG analysis, and health risk assessment (HRA) according to SJVAPCD’s Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (GAMAQI). This includes a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliant evaluation that will meet the requirements of both the City of Bakersfield Planning Division (BPD) and SJVAPCD’s GAMAQI.

Trinity completed the analysis for the previous Panama SPAL, which determined that there was a less than significant impact. The project’s construction and operational emissions were estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2020.4.0 and EMFAC2017 from the California Air Resources Board (CARB). The results from the prior estimations are summarized in Table 1 below.

Table 1. Project Emissions from Prior SPAL
Construction Emissions (Mitigated)
Year Pollutants (tons/yr)
ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
2022 0.30 2.59 2.63 0.01 0.32 0.19
2023 1.43 1.33 1.67 0.00 0.14 0.08
Maximum 1.43 2.59 2.63 0.01 0.32 0.19
Annual Threshold 10 10 100 27 15 15
November 26, 2025 VTTM 7432 Air Study Memo Page 2 of 15 Operational Emissions (Mitigated)
Emission Source Pollutants (tons/yr)
ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
Area Emissions 0.68 0.02 1.00 0.00 0.01 0.01
Energy Emissions 0.01 0.10 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01
Mobile Emissions 0.31 0.55 3.57 0.01 0.96 0.26
Total 1.00 0.67 4.61 0.01 0.97 0.27
Annual Threshold 10 10 100 27 15 15
As shown in Table 1 above, both the construction and operational emission were below applicable significance thresholds at the time of the Panama SPAL, which means that the project would have a less than significant impact on the surrounding area.

Reevaluation of emissions against the significance thresholds is required for VTTM 7432 due to the capacity updates as well as SJVAPCD’s threshold updates. For VTTM 7432, criteria, GHG, and air toxics emissions were estimated to analyze the potential impacts of the proposed Project. The following sections summarize the methodology and results of these impacts.

Methodology
Construction Emissions
The Project has an anticipated development of a single phase over approximately 1 year, with the necessary backbone infrastructure constructed as needed. Table 2 provides the land use type, subtype, size, units, and lot acreage that were entered into CalEEMod, and the construction schedule for the proposed Project is provided in Table 3. Construction emissions were conservatively estimated as if construction started in October of 2026, and Project operations are estimated to begin at the end of construction, in 2027.

Construction in later years would be predicted to have lower emissions than presented here because CalEEMod assumes cleaner (i.e., lower emissions) construction equipment and vehicles over time. The dates entered into the CalEEMod program do not represent the actual dates the equipment will operate; however, the dates reflect anticipated construction durations for various construction phases, and therefore, all estimated emission totals are conservative (i.e., tending to overstate emissions) and reflect a reasonable and legally sufficient estimate of potential impacts.

Table 2. CalEEMod Land Use Selection
Phase Land Use
Type Land Use Subtype Size Size Unit Lot Acreage
1 Residential Single Family Housing 137 Dwelling Unit 20.56 Table 3. Construction Schedule
Phase Start Date End Date
1 10/01/2026 10/30/2027
CalEEMod’s default construction equipment amounts and types were used and are shown in Table 4 below.

November 26, 2025 VTTM 7432 Air Study Memo Page 3 of 15 Table 4. CalEEMod Construction Equipment
Equipment Type1
Number of
Equipment per
Day
Hours per
Day Horsepower Load Factor
Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8 367 0.40
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8 84 0.37
Grading
Graders 1 8 148 0.41
Excavators 2 8 36 0.38
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 84 0.37
Scrapers 2 8 423 0.48
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 367 0.40
Building Construction
Forklifts 3 8 82 0.20
Generator Sets 1 8 14 0.74
Cranes 1 7 367 0.29
Welders 1 8 46 0.45
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7 84 0.37
Paving
Pavers 2 8 81 0.42
Paving Equipment 2 8 89 0.36
Rollers 2 8 36 0.38
Architectural Coatings
Air Compressors 1 6 37 0.48

1. Conservatively assuming all construction equipment is diesel fueled.

Additionally, the SJVAPCD requires dust the following dust control measures for all projects, and the analysis assumes compliance for the construction emissions estimates:
► Water unpaved construction roads;
► Water exposed areas 3 times per day; and
► Reduce vehicle speed to less than 25 miles per hour.

The construction emissions for the Project are provided in Table 7 of the Results section.

Operational Emissions
Vehicle Exhaust Emissions
Project operations and visitation will involve vehicles trips from residents, deliveries, and service, which will generate air pollutant emissions. Emissions were quantified in CalEEMod using trip rates, fleet mix percentages, and emission factors by vehicle type and adjusted for the Project as discussed below. The trip generation rate is based on the Traffic Analysis prepared by McIntosh & Associates, dated October 9, 2025, and are provided in Table 5 below.

Table 5. Mobile Trip Rates
Day Project Trip Generation Rate
(per dwelling unit/day)
All Days 9.84
November 26, 2025 VTTM 7432 Air Study Memo Page 4 of 15 CalEEMod includes emission factors for each vehicle type based on the California Air Resources Board’s (CARB’s) EMFAC 2021. The fleet mix percentages were based on SJVAPCD’s Residential Fleet Mix for the operational year of 2027.

Road Dust Emissions
CalEEMod calculates off-site road dust emissions according to the methodology described in USEPA’s AP-42, Section 13.2.1, Paved Roads, and Section 13.2.2, Unpaved Roads. The calculations include the following parameters: road silt loading, average vehicle weight (tons), material silt content, material moisture content, and mean vehicle speed (mph). CalEEMod assumes 100% paved road travel based on the Project location.

Hearths
CalEEMod calculates emissions from wood stoves and fireplaces for residential land uses. Available wood stove fuel types are conventional, catalytic, non-catalytic, and pellet. The fireplace fuel types are wood, gas, propane, and electric. The applicant will be committing to an all-electric development; therefore, wood, gas, and propane fireplaces will not be used. The number of electric fireplaces will be determined by the homebuilder and is currently unknown; therefore, 100% of the housing units were conservatively entered as having electric fireplaces in CalEEMod.

Consumer Products (Non-Industrial Solvents)
CalEEMod calculates fugitive VOC emissions from three types of consumer products (non-industrial solvents): general category, pesticides/fertilizers, and parking degreasers. As specified by Appendix C of the CalEEMod User Guide, the general category emission factor is used for the Single Family Residential land use type. The general category emission factor is based on statewide VOC emissions data collected by CARB’s Consumer Product Emission Inventory. The parking degreasing emission factor is based on CARB’s California Emissions Projection Analysis Model (CEPAM2019v1.03).

Architectural Coatings
CalEEMod calculates VOC off-gassing emissions that result from evaporation of solvents contained in surface coatings such as in paints and primers. A ten percent (10%) reapplication rate per year (full reapplication every 10 years) is assumed in the model, along with SJVAPCD specific residential exterior and residential interior VOC emission factors. CalEEMod calculates the building surface area as 2.7 times the building square footage for residential land use; 75% of the building surface area is assumed to be the interior, and the remaining 25% is assumed to be the exterior.

Landscape Equipment
The Project site is estimated to be developed with landscaped area, per CalEEMod’s default assumptions, that would require periodic management with the use of landscape equipment that would generate air pollutant emissions. CalEEMod calculates fuel combustion emissions from landscape maintenance, which includes equipment such as lawn mowers, shredders/grinders, leaf blowers, and equipment associated with snow removal. CalEEMod uses emission factors developed through CARB’s Small Off-Road Engines Model v1.1 (SORE2020) to calculate landscape equipment emissions. The emission factor for residential landscape equipment is in grams per dwelling unit per day. The emission factor is then multiplied by the number of snow days and the number of summer days for the project location. There is estimated to be 0 days of snowfall, and the number of summer days is based on the CalEEMod default for Kern County (180 days).

Although some portion of landscape equipment would be expected to be electric powered; this analysis conservatively assumes that all landscape equipment would be gas powered.

November 26, 2025 VTTM 7432 Air Study Memo Page 5 of 15 Energy Emissions
CalEEMod calculates criteria pollutant and GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas usage. CalEEMod generates default electricity and natural gas consumption based on the Electricity Demand Forecast Zone (EDFZ), which is defined by the project location, and the land use types and building square footage.

CalEEMod differentiates between electricity usage subject to Title 24 standards, which is generally building usage, and electricity usage not subject to Title 24 standards. CalEEMod’s default ratio of Title 24 to non Title 24 electricity usage was applied to the Project’s total estimated electricity usage. CalEEMod only calculates GHG emissions associated with electricity usage; the GHG emission factors are specific to the electric utility, which CalEEMod determines based on project location.

As provided by the applicant, the Project will include the following project design measures, which were selected as emission reduction measures in CalEEMod.
► E-2: Require Energy Efficient Appliances (ENERGY STAR appliances will be installed) • Dishwasher
• Ceiling Fan
► E-12-B: Install Electric Space Heater in Place of Natural Gas Heaters in Residences ► E-13: Install Electric Ranges in Place of Gas Ranges
► E-15: Require All-Electric Development
► E-25: Install Electric Heat Pumps
Additionally, the Project will include the installation of solar panels for every dwelling unit. The CalEEMod model currently does not allow for the simultaneous selection of emission reduction measure E-15, Require All-Electric Development, and E-10-B, Establish Onsite Renewable Energy Systems: Solar Power. Due to this restriction, the additional reduction in GHGs from the solar panels was quantified using CalEEMod methodology separately for this report. The electricity generated from solar panels are included in Table 6 below.

Table 6. Solar Panel Generation
# of
Units kW/Unit
► System Output
Lower Range
(kWh/Year)
► System Output
► Upper Range
(kWh/Year)
► System Output
Average
► (kWh/Year)
137 4.2 6,754 7,208 6,981
Total Solar Generation 956,397 kWh/year
Source: Average value obtained from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s (NREL) PVWatts Calculator. *Note: 0.00 could represent > 0.00
Solar generation was calculated using a system size of 4.2 kW/unit, as provided by the applicant.

Generation was estimated using the project’s location to reflect the solar radiation conditions in Bakersfield, CA throughout the year. The average annual output from a single system provided by the NREL PVWatts Calculator was then multiplied by the total number of homes in the project to determine the project’s total solar generation. The reduction in GHG emissions from solar panels are provided in Table 13 below.

Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment Emissions
CalEEMod calculates indirect GHG emissions from the electricity used to supply, distribute, and treat water and wastewater generated by land use development projects (CAPCOA 2022b). CalEEMod estimates the annual water usages from both indoors using the Residential End Uses of Water published by the Water Research Foundation (WRF) (2016) and outdoors using the Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA) method established under the California Department of Water Resources’ (DWR) 2015 November 26, 2025 VTTM 7432 Air Study Memo Page 6 of 15 Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO). CalEEMod uses default water energy-intensity factors based on a study published by the Pacific Institute. The factors, which are reported in kilowatt hours per million gallons of water used (kWh/MG), represent the electricity need to supply and convey water from the source, treat the water to usable standards, and distribute the water to the individual user. The report calculated the energy intensity factors based on the hydrologic region of the project. These factors assume water is supplied from the source, which involves groundwater pumping and water delivery. The use of the CalEEMod default energy-intensity factors accounts for the electricity that would be used by the Project for supplying water.

For wastewater treatment emissions, CalEEMod has default emission factors for the type of treatment process: septic tank, aerobic, or facultative lagoons. CalEEMod’s statewide default treatment distribution was utilized in the model. CalEEMod utilizes CARB’s Local Government Operations Protocol (LGOP) to calculate the GHG emission factors for each type of wastewater treatment.

Solid Waste Emissions
CalEEMod calculates the indirect GHG emissions associated with waste that is disposed of at a landfill. The model uses annual waste disposal rates from the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) data for individual land use types.

Health Risk Assessment
The Project would result in emissions of Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) and would be located near existing residents and other receptors; therefore, an assessment of the potential risk to the population attributable to emissions of hazardous air pollutants from the Project was performed to determine whether the Project would result in a significant health risk impact.

To predict the potential health risk to the population attributable to emissions of TACs from the proposed Project, ambient air concentrations were predicted with dispersion modeling to arrive at a conservative estimate of increased individual carcinogenic risk that might occur as a result of continuous exposure over the construction timeline, which was conservatively assumed to occur over 2 years. Similarly, predicted concentrations were used to calculate non-cancer chronic and acute hazard indices (HIs), which are the ratio of expected exposure to acceptable exposure. The basis for evaluating potential health risk is the identification of sources with increased TACs.

Air Dispersion Modeling (AERMOD)
Air dispersion modeling is used to estimate off-site air concentrations of chemicals associated with facility emissions. Developed to replace the Industrial Source Complex Short-Term Version 3 (ISCST3) model, AERMOD is a steady-state Gaussian plume model that can be used to assess ground level pollutant concentrations from a wide variety of sources (point, line, area, or volume) for distances up to approximately 50 km, including urban and rural terrains. AERMOD can calculate ground level concentrations for various averaging periods, such as acute short-term exposures (1-hour averaging), chronic long term exposures (annual averages), or other required meteorological data periods (i.e., 3-hour, 8-hour, 24-hour).

The assumptions used for this model are listed below.
► AERMOD Version 24142
► Projection Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM)
► Datum World Geodetic System (WGS84)
► UTM Zone 11
► Hemisphere Northern
► Selection Hourly and Period
November 26, 2025 VTTM 7432 Air Study Memo Page 7 of 15 ► AERMOD File .AMI and .AMZ
► AERMOD Output File Plot File by Source
► Use Regulatory Default? Yes
► Urban or Rural? Rural
► Building Downwash? Not Applicable
Health risk is determined using the Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program (HARP2) software distributed by the CARB; HARP2 requires peak 1-hour emission rates and annual-averaged emission rates for all pollutants for each modeling source. Assumptions used to calculate the emission rates for the proposed Project are outlined below.

Sources
To assess health risk impacts associated with Project construction emissions, combustion emissions from diesel on-site construction equipment and heavy heavy duty (HHD) trucks from hauling and vendor trips were modeled as an area source for on-site construction activity on the property. A unit emission rate of 1 grams/second (g/sec) was input to AERMOD as a normalized emission rate. This normalized emission rate generates a file that contains the partial contribution of each source to the total air concentration in units of micrograms per cubic meter (g/m3) at each receptor. This AERMOD output file is then used as an input file into HARP2.

Receptors
Health risk levels were modeled for discrete receptor points along the boundary of the Project site.

Additionally, a receptor grid was modeled over areas in proximity to the Project site that contains the nearest residential and other receptor locations, as shown on Figure 1. A total of 4,173 discrete off-site receptors were analyzed. Elevated terrain options were employed to account for the topography of the Project area.

November 26, 2025 VTTM 7432 Air Study Memo Page 8 of 15 Figure 1. Off-site Receptor Locations
Meteorological Data
SJVAPCD provides AERMET UStar processed, AERMOD-ready meteorological data. The Bakersfield monitoring data set has been identified as the most applicable for the Project based on proximity and similarity in terrain, elevation, land use, and other surface characteristics. The data set for calendar years 2018 through 2022 was input to AERMOD. This was the most recent available dataset available at the time the modeling was conducted. Rural dispersion parameters were used because the operation and the majority of the land surrounding the Project site is considered "rural" under the Auer land use classification method.

HARP2
Plot files generated by AERMOD were uploaded to the Air Dispersion Modeling and Risk Assessment Tool (ADMRT) program in HARP2. ADMRT post-processing was used to assess the potential for excess cancer risk and chronic and acute non-cancer effects using the most recent health effects data from the California EPA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA).

Toxic Emissions Quantification
Diesel particulate matter was calculated using CalEEMod for on-site construction equipment. The model conservatively assumes all PM10 emissions from diesel combustion are diesel particulate matter.

Exposure
HARP2 site parameters were set for the mandatory minimum pathways (inhalation, soil ingestion, dermal, and mother’s milk) and homegrown produce. As required by SJVAPCD, time away from home adjustments were not applied in HARP2. Risk reports were generated using the derived OEHHA analysis method for carcinogenic risk and non-carcinogenic chronic and acute risk. Site parameters are included in the HARP2 output files. Total cancer risk was predicted for each receptor. A hazard index was computed for chronic November 26, 2025 VTTM 7432 Air Study Memo Page 9 of 15 non-cancer health effects for each applicable endpoint and each receptor. A hazard index for acute noncancer health effects was not computed since DPM does not have a risk exposure level for acute risk.

Results
Construction Emissions
Table 7 presents the estimated Project construction emissions based on the modeling methodology mentioned in the prior section.

Table 7. Project Construction Emissions
Emissions Source Pollutant (tons/year)
ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
2026 0.08 0.70 0.83 0.00 0.10 0.05
2027 0.98 1.22 1.87 0.00 0.13 0.06
Maximum 0.98 1.22 1.87 0.00 0.13 0.06
Annual Threshold 10 10 100 27 15 15
Source: Trinity Consultants 2025
*Note: 0.00 could represent > 0.00
For all construction years of the Project, the criteria pollutants are under the significant thresholds specified by SJVAPCD; therefore, the proposed Project will have a less than significant impact.

Operations Emissions
Once the Project is constructed and begins operations, criteria pollutant emissions would be generated by mobile and area sources. The estimated annual operations emissions are shown in Table 8.

Table 8. Annual Operations Emissions
Emissions Source ► Pollutant (tons/year)
ROG ► NOX ► CO ► SOx ► PM10 ► PM2.5
Mobile 0.70 0.79 7.01 0.02 1.83 0.47
Area 1.19 0.01 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1.88 0.80 7.71 0.02 1.83 0.47
Annual Threshold 10 10 100 27 15 15
Source: Trinity Consultants 2025
*Note: 0.00 could represent > 0.00
Health Risk Results
SJVAPCD has set the level of significance for carcinogenic risk at twenty in one million, which is understood as the possibility of causing twenty additional cancer cases in a population of one million people. The level of significance for chronic and acute non-cancer risk is a hazard index of 1.0. All receptors were modeled with a 2-year exposure duration.

The carcinogenic risk and the health hazard index (HI) for chronic and acute non-cancer risk at the point of maximum impact (PMI) do not exceed the significance levels of twenty in one million (20 x 10-6) and 1.0, respectively for the proposed Project. The PMIs are identified by receptor location and risk and are provided in Table 9 below.

November 26, 2025 VTTM 7432 Air Study Memo Page 10 of 15 Table 9. Maximum Potential Health Impacts
Value UTM East UTM North
Excess Cancer Risk 7.97 in a million 308113.7 3908100.3 Chronic Hazard Index 0.005 308113.7 3908100.3
*There is not acute hazard index as there is no acute risk value associated with the diesel particulate matter.

All risk values and health hazard indexes are below the thresholds of significance and, therefore, the Project would have a less than significant impact on the toxics in the surrounding areas. Modeling files are provided as an electronic attachment.

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions
The following tables present the estimated Project operational GHG emissions based on the modeling methodology mentioned in the Operational Emissions section.

Table 10. Estimated Annual GHG Emissions (MT/Year)
Source CO2 CH4 N2O R CO2e
Construction - Mitigated
Total 541 0 0 0 546
Operations - Mitigated
Mobile 1,748 0.09 0.08 2.36 1,777
Area 5.13 0.00 0.00 5.17
Energy 119 0.02 0.00 120
Water 7.10 0.18 0.00 12.95
Waste 11.00 1.10 0.00 38.48
Refrig. 0.32 0.32
Total Operations 1,890 1.39 0.09 2.68 1,953
Annualized
Construction 18.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 18.20
Project Emissions 1,908 1.39 0.09 2.69 1,972
Table 11. Operational GHG Emissions - Unmitigated1
Category Emissions (MT/year)
CO2 CH4 N2O R CO2e
Mobile 1,748 0.09 0.08 2.36 1,776
Area 109 0.00 0.00 0.00 109
Energy 401 0.04 0.00 0.00 403
Water 7.10 0.18 0.00 0.00 12.95
Waste 11.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 38.48
Refrigeration 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.32
Total 2,276 1.42 0.09 2.68 2,340
1 Unmitigated emissions represent GHG emissions prior to accounting for project design measures.

November 26, 2025 VTTM 7432 Air Study Memo Page 11 of 15 Table 12. Operational GHG Emissions - All Electric
Category Emissions (MT/year)
CO2 CH4 N2O R CO2e
Mobile 1,748 0.09 0.08 2.36 1,777
Area 5.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.17
Energy 119 0.02 0.00 0.00 120
Water 7.10 0.18 0.00 0.00 12.95
Waste 11.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 38.48
Refrigeration 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.32
Total 1,890 1.39 0.09 2.68 1,953
Table 13. Operational GHG Emissions - Solar Reduction1
Category Emissions (MT/year)
CO2 CH4 N2O R CO2e2
Solar Reductions -88.49 -0.014 -0.002 - -89.37
Total after
Reductions 1,801 1.38 0.08 - 1,864

1. GHG reduction from solar calculated outside of CalEEMod as the model does not currently allow for the simultaneous selection of an all-electric development mitigation measure and the solar panel mitigation measure.

2. Calculated using global warming potential (GWP) of 25 for CH4 and 298 for N2O, as is used in CalEEMod 2022.1.

Table 14. Total GHG Reduction
Category Emissions (MT/year)
CO2 CH4 N2O R CO2e
Mobile - - - - -
Area -103.86 0.00 0.000 - -103.94
Energy -371.15 -0.04 -0.002 - -372.81
Water - - - - -
Waste - - - - -
Refrigeration - - - - -
Total -475.01 -0.04 -0.002 - -476.74
Table 15. Percent GHG Reduction
Category Emissions (MT/year)
CO2 CH4 N2O R CO2e
Mobile - - - - -
Area -95.3% -70.0% -62.3% - -95.3%
Energy -92.5% -88.9% -79.3% - -92.4%
Water - - - - -
Waste - - - - -
Refrigeration - - - - -
Total -20.9% -2.9% -2.8% - -20.4%
November 26, 2025 VTTM 7432 Air Study Memo Page 12 of 15 Prior SPAL Results Comparison
The results of the Project’s air quality and GHG potential impacts were compared against those of the Panama SPAL. The Project is a revision of Panama SPAL, in which the revised project projected 137 single family residences from the original 135 single family residences. The proposed Project construction and operation emissions and the VTTM 7432 construction and operation emissions are compared in Table 16 and Table 17 below.

Table 16. Comparison of VTTM 7432 to Panama SPAL – Criteria Pollutants Construction Emissions (Mitigated)
Project Pollutants (tons/yr)
ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
Panama SPAL Maximum Annual
Emissions 1.43 2.59 2.63 0.005 0.32 0.19
VTTM 7432 Maximum Annual Emissions 0.98 1.22 1.87 0.003 0.13 0.06 Average Annual Emissions Increase -0.45 -1.37 -0.76 -0.002 -0.19 -0.13 Operational Emissions (Mitigated)
Emission Source Pollutants (tons/yr)
ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
Panama SPAL Annual Emissions 1.00 0.67 4.61 0.010 0.97 0.27 VTTM 7432 Annual Emissions 1.88 0.80 7.71 0.019 1.83 0.47 Average Annual Emissions Increase 0.88 0.13 3.10 0.009 0.86 0.20 Table 17. Comparison of VTTM 7432 to Panama SPAL – GHGs Construction Emissions (Mitigated)
Project Pollutants (MT/yr)
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Panama SPAL Maximum Annual
Emissions 457 0.10 0.007 461
VTTM 7432 Maximum Annual Emissions 372 0.01 0.012 375
Average Annual Emissions Increase -85 -0.09 0.005 -86
Operational Emissions (Mitigated)
Emission Source Pollutants (MT/yr)
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Panama SPAL Annual Emissions 1,037 1.11 0.05 1,081
VTTM 7432 Annual Emissions 1,802 1.38 0.08 1,864
Average Annual Emissions Increase 764 0.26 0.03 783
The Project is estimated to have less construction emissions when compared to the prior project’s estimated emissions. This is likely due to differences in CalEEMod emission factors between model versions to account for improvements to construction equipment technology over time.

November 26, 2025 VTTM 7432 Air Study Memo Page 13 of 15 The Project is estimated to have an increase of operation emissions when compared to the prior project’s estimated emissions. This is likely due to differences in CalEEMod emission factors and data between model versions.

Summary
Based on the air quality and GHG impact assessment above, Trinity has concluded the following:
► Both the previous Panama SPAL and the proposed Project would have short-term air quality impacts due to construction activities as well as vehicular emissions. Both of these impacts would be mitigated and were found to be less than significant before and after mitigation. ► Both the previous Panama SPAL and the proposed Project would result in long-term air quality impacts due to operational and related emissions. These impacts were found to be less than significant before and after mitigation.
► Both the previous Panama SPAL and the proposed Project would result in health risk impacts due to construction activities. These impacts were found to be less than significant.

Attachment 1
CalEEMod Output Files
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
1 / 68
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2026) - Unmitigated

3.2. Site Preparation (2026) - Mitigated

3.3. Grading (2026) - Unmitigated
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
2 / 68

3.4. Grading (2026) - Mitigated

3.5. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated

3.6. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated

3.8. Building Construction (2027) - Mitigated

3.9. Paving (2027) - Unmitigated

3.10. Paving (2027) - Mitigated

3.11. Architectural Coating (2027) - Unmitigated

3.12. Architectural Coating (2027) - Mitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.1.2. Mitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
3 / 68

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.3.2. Mitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.4.2. Mitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.5.2. Mitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.6.2. Mitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.7.2. Mitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.8.2. Mitigated
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
4 / 68

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.9.2. Mitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.2.2. Mitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.3.2. Mitigated
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
5 / 68

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.9.2. Mitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
6 / 68

5.11.2. Mitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.12.2. Mitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.13.2. Mitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.14.2. Mitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.15.2. Mitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
7 / 68

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2.2. Mitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

8. User Changes to Default Data

8.1. Justifications
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
8 / 68

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name VTTM 7432- Mitigated
Construction Start Date 10/1/2026
Operational Year 2027
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.7
Precipitation (days) 18
Location 35.298896612009486, -119.1121487732313
County Kern-San Joaquin
City Bakersfield
Air District San Joaquin Valley APCD
Air Basin San Joaquin Valley
TAZ 2810
EDFZ 5
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.32

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Single Family
Housing
137 Dwelling Unit 21 267,150 741,714 — 441 —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
9 / 68

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Sector # Measure Title
Construction C-10-A Water Exposed Surfaces
Construction C-10-C Water Unpaved Construction Roads
Construction C-11 Limit Vehicle Speeds on Unpaved Roads Energy E-2 Require Energy Efficient Appliances
Energy E-12-B Install Electric Space Heater in Place of Natural Gas Heaters in Residences
Energy E-13 Install Electric Ranges in Place of Gas Ranges Energy E-15 Require All-Electric Development
Energy E-25* Install Electric Heat Pumps
* Qualitative or supporting measure. Emission reductions not included in the mitigated emissions results.

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.5 1.2 10 16 0.03 0.34 0.73 1.1 0.32 0.18 0.49 — 3,495 3,495 0.11 0.11 3.0 3,534 Mit. 1.5 1.2 10 16 0.03 0.34 0.73 1.1 0.32 0.18 0.49 — 3,495 3,495 0.11 0.11 3.0 3,534 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 112 112 29 30 0.06 1.2 20 21 1.1 10 11 — 6,830 6,830 0.27 0.11 0.09 6,856 Mit. 112 112 29 30 0.06 1.2 5.3 6.6 1.1 2.7 3.8 — 6,830 6,830 0.27 0.11 0.09 6,856 VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
10 / 68
%
Reduced
— — — — — — 73% 69% — 74% 66% — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 5.5 5.4 6.7 10 0.02 0.23 1.1 1.3 0.21 0.48 0.62 — 2,244 2,244 0.07 0.07 0.84 2,268 Mit. 5.5 5.4 6.7 10 0.02 0.23 0.47 0.70 0.21 0.14 0.32 — 2,244 2,244 0.07 0.07 0.84 2,268 %
Reduced
— — — — — — 59% 46% — 70% 48% — — — — — — —
Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.0 0.98 1.2 1.9 < 0.005 0.04 0.21 0.24 0.04 0.09 0.11 — 372 372 0.01 0.01 0.14 375 Mit. 1.0 0.98 1.2 1.9 < 0.005 0.04 0.09 0.13 0.04 0.03 0.06 — 372 372 0.01 0.01 0.14 375 %
Reduced
— — — — — — 59% 46% — 70% 48% — — — — — — —

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 1.5 1.2 10 16 0.03 0.34 0.73 1.1 0.32 0.18 0.49 — 3,495 3,495 0.11 0.11 3.0 3,534 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2026 3.8 3.2 29 30 0.06 1.2 20 21 1.1 10 11 — 6,830 6,830 0.27 0.11 0.09 6,856 2027 112 112 10 15 0.03 0.34 0.73 1.1 0.32 0.18 0.49 — 3,418 3,418 0.11 0.11 0.08 3,453 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2026 0.53 0.44 3.8 4.6 0.01 0.15 1.1 1.3 0.14 0.48 0.62 — 1,024 1,024 0.04 0.02 0.21 1,031 2027 5.5 5.4 6.7 10 0.02 0.23 0.47 0.70 0.21 0.11 0.32 — 2,244 2,244 0.07 0.07 0.84 2,268 VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
11 / 68
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2026 0.10 0.08 0.70 0.83 < 0.005 0.03 0.21 0.24 0.03 0.09 0.11 — 169 169 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 171 2027 1.0 0.98 1.2 1.9 < 0.005 0.04 0.09 0.13 0.04 0.02 0.06 — 372 372 0.01 0.01 0.14 375

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 1.5 1.2 10 16 0.03 0.34 0.73 1.1 0.32 0.18 0.49 — 3,495 3,495 0.11 0.11 3.0 3,534 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2026 3.8 3.2 29 30 0.06 1.2 5.3 6.6 1.1 2.7 3.8 — 6,830 6,830 0.27 0.11 0.09 6,856 2027 112 112 10 15 0.03 0.34 0.73 1.1 0.32 0.18 0.49 — 3,418 3,418 0.11 0.11 0.08 3,453 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2026 0.53 0.44 3.8 4.6 0.01 0.15 0.38 0.53 0.14 0.14 0.28 — 1,024 1,024 0.04 0.02 0.21 1,031 2027 5.5 5.4 6.7 10 0.02 0.23 0.47 0.70 0.21 0.11 0.32 — 2,244 2,244 0.07 0.07 0.84 2,268 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2026 0.10 0.08 0.70 0.83 < 0.005 0.03 0.07 0.10 0.03 0.03 0.05 — 169 169 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 171 2027 1.0 0.98 1.2 1.9 < 0.005 0.04 0.09 0.13 0.04 0.02 0.06 — 372 372 0.01 0.01 0.14 375

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
12 / 68
Unmit. 12 11 5.4 57 0.12 0.18 10 10 0.17 2.5 2.7 77 14,002 14,080 8.5 0.51 35 14,479 Mit. 12 11 4.1 56 0.11 0.07 10 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 77 12,295 12,372 8.4 0.50 35 12,767 %
Reduced
1% 1% 25% 1% 7% 61% — 1% 63% — 4% — 12% 12% 2% 1% — 12% Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 11 10.0 6.0 37 0.11 0.18 10 10 0.17 2.5 2.7 77 12,774 12,851 8.6 0.55 2.8 13,231 Mit. 10 9.9 4.7 37 0.10 0.07 10 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 77 11,067 11,144 8.4 0.54 2.8 11,519 %
Reduced
1% 1% 22% 2% 8% 62% — 1% 64% — 4% — 13% 13% 2% 1% — 13% Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 11 10 5.7 43 0.11 0.18 10.0 10 0.17 2.5 2.7 77 13,047 13,124 8.6 0.52 16 13,510 Mit. 11 10 4.4 42 0.10 0.07 10.0 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 77 11,340 11,417 8.4 0.52 16 11,798 %
Reduced
1% 1% 24% 1% 8% 62% — 1% 63% — 4% — 13% 13% 2% 1% — 13% Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.0 1.9 1.0 7.8 0.02 0.03 1.8 1.9 0.03 0.46 0.49 13 2,160 2,173 1.4 0.09 2.7 2,237 Mit. 2.0 1.9 0.80 7.7 0.02 0.01 1.8 1.8 0.01 0.46 0.47 13 1,877 1,890 1.4 0.09 2.7 1,953 %
Reduced
1% 1% 24% 1% 8% 62% — 1% 63% — 4% — 13% 13% 2% 1% — 13%

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 4.8 4.3 4.0 48 0.11 0.07 10 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 — 11,433 11,433 0.53 0.46 33 11,617 VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
13 / 68
Area 6.9 6.9 0.07 7.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 113 113 0.02 < 0.005 — 114 Energy 0.16 0.08 1.3 0.57 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 2,424 2,424 0.27 0.02 — 2,436 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 11 32 43 1.1 0.03 — 78
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 66 0.00 66 6.6 0.00 — 232
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.9 1.9
Total 12 11 5.4 57 0.12 0.18 10 10 0.17 2.5 2.7 77 14,002 14,080 8.5 0.51 35 14,479 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 4.3 3.7 4.7 37 0.10 0.07 10 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 — 10,225 10,225 0.58 0.50 0.86 10,390 Area 6.2 6.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 92 92 0.01 < 0.005 — 93 Energy 0.16 0.08 1.3 0.57 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 2,424 2,424 0.27 0.02 — 2,436 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 11 32 43 1.1 0.03 — 78
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 66 0.00 66 6.6 0.00 — 232
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.9 1.9
Total 11 10.0 6.0 37 0.11 0.18 10 10 0.17 2.5 2.7 77 12,774 12,851 8.6 0.55 2.8 13,231 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 4.3 3.8 4.3 38 0.10 0.07 10.0 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 — 10,560 10,560 0.55 0.48 14 10,731 Area 6.5 6.5 0.04 3.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 31 31 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 31 Energy 0.16 0.08 1.3 0.57 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 2,424 2,424 0.27 0.02 — 2,436 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 11 32 43 1.1 0.03 — 78
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 66 0.00 66 6.6 0.00 — 232
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.9 1.9
Total 11 10 5.7 43 0.11 0.18 10.0 10 0.17 2.5 2.7 77 13,047 13,124 8.6 0.52 16 13,510 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.79 0.70 0.79 7.0 0.02 0.01 1.8 1.8 0.01 0.46 0.47 — 1,748 1,748 0.09 0.08 2.4 1,777 Area 1.2 1.2 0.01 0.70 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 5.1 5.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.2 Energy 0.03 0.01 0.25 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 401 401 0.04 < 0.005 — 403 VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
14 / 68
Water — — — — — — — — — — — 1.8 5.3 7.1 0.18 < 0.005 — 13 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 11 0.00 11 1.1 0.00 — 38
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.32 0.32
Total 2.0 1.9 1.0 7.8 0.02 0.03 1.8 1.9 0.03 0.46 0.49 13 2,160 2,173 1.4 0.09 2.7 2,237

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 4.8 4.3 4.0 48 0.11 0.07 10 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 — 11,433 11,433 0.53 0.46 33 11,617 Area 6.9 6.9 0.07 7.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 113 113 0.02 < 0.005 — 114 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 717 717 0.12 0.01 — 724 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 11 32 43 1.1 0.03 — 78
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 66 0.00 66 6.6 0.00 — 232
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.9 1.9
Total 12 11 4.1 56 0.11 0.07 10 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 77 12,295 12,372 8.4 0.50 35 12,767 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 4.3 3.7 4.7 37 0.10 0.07 10 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 — 10,225 10,225 0.58 0.50 0.86 10,390 Area 6.2 6.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 92 92 0.01 < 0.005 — 93 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 717 717 0.12 0.01 — 724 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 11 32 43 1.1 0.03 — 78
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 66 0.00 66 6.6 0.00 — 232
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.9 1.9
Total 10 9.9 4.7 37 0.10 0.07 10 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 77 11,067 11,144 8.4 0.54 2.8 11,519 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
15 / 68
Mobile 4.3 3.8 4.3 38 0.10 0.07 10.0 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 — 10,560 10,560 0.55 0.48 14 10,731 Area 6.5 6.5 0.04 3.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 31 31 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 31 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 717 717 0.12 0.01 — 724 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 11 32 43 1.1 0.03 — 78
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 66 0.00 66 6.6 0.00 — 232
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.9 1.9
Total 11 10 4.4 42 0.10 0.07 10.0 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 77 11,340 11,417 8.4 0.52 16 11,798 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.79 0.70 0.79 7.0 0.02 0.01 1.8 1.8 0.01 0.46 0.47 — 1,748 1,748 0.09 0.08 2.4 1,777 Area 1.2 1.2 0.01 0.70 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 5.1 5.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.2 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 119 119 0.02 < 0.005 — 120 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 1.8 5.3 7.1 0.18 < 0.005 — 13 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 11 0.00 11 1.1 0.00 — 38
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.32 0.32
Total 2.0 1.9 0.80 7.7 0.02 0.01 1.8 1.8 0.01 0.46 0.47 13 1,877 1,890 1.4 0.09 2.7 1,953

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
16 / 68
Off-Roa 3.7 3.1 29 29 0.05 1.2 — 1.2 1.1 — 1.1 — 5,298 5,298 0.21 0.04 — 5,316 d
Equipm
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 20 20 — 10 10 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.07 0.06 0.56 0.55 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 102 102 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 102 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.38 0.38 — 0.19 0.19 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.01 0.01 0.10 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 17 17 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 17 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.07 0.07 — 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
17 / 68
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 203 203 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 205 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.0 4.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.67 0.67 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.68 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.2. Site Preparation (2026) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

3.7 3.1 29 29 0.05 1.2 — 1.2 1.1 — 1.1 — 5,298 5,298 0.21 0.04 — 5,316 VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
18 / 68
Dust — — — — — — 5.1 5.1 — 2.6 2.6 — — — — — — —
From
Material
Movement
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.07 0.06 0.56 0.55 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 102 102 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 102 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.10 0.10 — 0.05 0.05 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.01 0.01 0.10 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 17 17 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 17 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.02 0.02 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 203 203 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 205 VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
19 / 68
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.0 4.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.67 0.67 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.68 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.3. Grading (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

3.6 3.0 27 28 0.06 1.1 — 1.1 1.0 — 1.0 — 6,599 6,599 0.27 0.05 — 6,621 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 9.2 9.2 — 3.7 3.7 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
20 / 68
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.26 0.22 1.9 2.0 < 0.005 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 470 470 0.02 < 0.005 — 472 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.66 0.66 — 0.26 0.26 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.05 0.04 0.35 0.36 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 78 78 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 78 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.12 0.12 — 0.05 0.05 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 232 232 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 235 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 17 17 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 17 VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
21 / 68
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.8 2.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.4. Grading (2026) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

3.6 3.0 27 28 0.06 1.1 — 1.1 1.0 — 1.0 — 6,599 6,599 0.27 0.05 — 6,621 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 2.4 2.4 — 0.95 0.95 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.26 0.22 1.9 2.0 < 0.005 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 470 470 0.02 < 0.005 — 472 VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
22 / 68
Dust — — — — — — 0.17 0.17 — 0.07 0.07 — — — — — — —
From
Material
Movement
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.05 0.04 0.35 0.36 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 78 78 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 78 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.03 0.03 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 232 232 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 235 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 17 17 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 17 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.8 2.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.9 VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
23 / 68
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.5. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.3 1.1 9.9 13 0.02 0.38 — 0.38 0.35 — 0.35 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.16 0.13 1.2 1.6 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.04 — 0.04 — 298 298 0.01 < 0.005 — 299 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.03 0.02 0.22 0.29 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 49 49 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 50 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
24 / 68
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.21 0.19 0.23 2.3 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 571 571 0.01 0.02 0.06 578 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.56 0.17 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.04 — 472 472 0.01 0.07 0.03 492 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 74 74 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.12 75 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 59 59 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 61 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12 12 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 12 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.7 9.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.6. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
25 / 68
Off-Roa 1.3 1.1 9.9 13 0.02 0.38 — 0.38 0.35 — 0.35 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 d
Equipm
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.16 0.13 1.2 1.6 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.04 — 0.04 — 298 298 0.01 < 0.005 — 299 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.03 0.02 0.22 0.29 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 49 49 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 50 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.21 0.19 0.23 2.3 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 571 571 0.01 0.02 0.06 578 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.56 0.17 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.04 — 472 472 0.01 0.07 0.03 492 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 74 74 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.12 75 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 59 59 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 61 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
26 / 68
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12 12 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 12 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.7 9.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.2 1.0 9.4 13 0.02 0.34 — 0.34 0.31 — 0.31 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.2 1.0 9.4 13 0.02 0.34 — 0.34 0.31 — 0.31 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.77 0.65 5.9 8.1 0.01 0.21 — 0.21 0.19 — 0.19 — 1,509 1,509 0.06 0.01 — 1,514 VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
27 / 68
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.14 0.12 1.1 1.5 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 250 250 0.01 < 0.005 — 251 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.21 0.20 0.16 3.2 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 638 638 0.01 0.02 1.9 647 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.51 0.16 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.04 — 461 461 0.01 0.07 1.1 482 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.19 0.18 0.21 2.1 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 560 560 0.01 0.02 0.05 567 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.54 0.17 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.04 — 461 461 0.01 0.07 0.03 481 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.12 0.11 0.12 1.5 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.09 0.09 — 366 366 0.01 0.01 0.52 371 Vendor 0.01 0.01 0.33 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.09 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 — 290 290 < 0.005 0.04 0.30 303 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 61 61 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 61 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 48 48 < 0.005 0.01 0.05 50 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
28 / 68

3.8. Building Construction (2027) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.2 1.0 9.4 13 0.02 0.34 — 0.34 0.31 — 0.31 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.2 1.0 9.4 13 0.02 0.34 — 0.34 0.31 — 0.31 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.77 0.65 5.9 8.1 0.01 0.21 — 0.21 0.19 — 0.19 — 1,509 1,509 0.06 0.01 — 1,514 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.14 0.12 1.1 1.5 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 250 250 0.01 < 0.005 — 251 VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
29 / 68
Onsite
truck

3.9. Paving (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
30 / 68
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.88 0.74 6.9 10.0 0.01 0.30 — 0.30 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.88 0.74 6.9 10.0 0.01 0.30 — 0.30 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.04 0.03 0.29 0.41 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 62 62 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 62 Paving 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.01 0.01 0.05 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10 10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10 Paving 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
31 / 68
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 194 194 < 0.005 0.01 0.59 197 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 170 170 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 172 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.3 7.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.2 1.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.10. Paving (2027) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
32 / 68
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.88 0.74 6.9 10.0 0.01 0.30 — 0.30 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.88 0.74 6.9 10.0 0.01 0.30 — 0.30 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.04 0.03 0.29 0.41 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 62 62 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 62 Paving 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.01 0.01 0.05 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10 10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10 Paving 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
33 / 68
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 194 194 < 0.005 0.01 0.59 197 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 170 170 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 172 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.3 7.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.2 1.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.11. Architectural Coating (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
34 / 68
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.14 0.11 0.83 1.1 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coating
s
111 111 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.01 < 0.005 0.03 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.5 5.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.5 Architect
ural
Coating
s

4.6 4.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.91 0.91 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.91 Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.84 0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
35 / 68
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 112 112 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 113 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.8 4.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.79 0.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.80 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.12. Architectural Coating (2027) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
36 / 68
Off-Roa
Equipment

0.14 0.11 0.83 1.1 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coating
s
111 111 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.01 < 0.005 0.03 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.5 5.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.5 Architect
ural
Coating
s

4.6 4.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.84 0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
37 / 68
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 112 112 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 113 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.8 4.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.79 0.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.80 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

4.8 4.3 4.0 48 0.11 0.07 10 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 — 11,433 11,433 0.53 0.46 33 11,617 Total 4.8 4.3 4.0 48 0.11 0.07 10 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 — 11,433 11,433 0.53 0.46 33 11,617 VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
38 / 68
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.79 0.70 0.79 7.0 0.02 0.01 1.8 1.8 0.01 0.46 0.47 — 1,748 1,748 0.09 0.08 2.4 1,777 Total 0.79 0.70 0.79 7.0 0.02 0.01 1.8 1.8 0.01 0.46 0.47 — 1,748 1,748 0.09 0.08 2.4 1,777

4.1.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

4.8 4.3 4.0 48 0.11 0.07 10 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 — 11,433 11,433 0.53 0.46 33 11,617 Total 4.8 4.3 4.0 48 0.11 0.07 10 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 — 11,433 11,433 0.53 0.46 33 11,617 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

4.3 3.7 4.7 37 0.10 0.07 10 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 — 10,225 10,225 0.58 0.50 0.86 10,390 Total 4.3 3.7 4.7 37 0.10 0.07 10 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 — 10,225 10,225 0.58 0.50 0.86 10,390 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
39 / 68
Single 0.79 0.70 0.79 7.0 0.02 0.01 1.8 1.8 0.01 0.46 0.47 — 1,748 1,748 0.09 0.08 2.4 1,777 Family
Housing
Total 0.79 0.70 0.79 7.0 0.02 0.01 1.8 1.8 0.01 0.46 0.47 — 1,748 1,748 0.09 0.08 2.4 1,777

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — 716 716 0.12 0.01 — 723
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 716 716 0.12 0.01 — 723
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — 716 716 0.12 0.01 — 723
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 716 716 0.12 0.01 — 723
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — 118 118 0.02 < 0.005 — 120
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 118 118 0.02 < 0.005 — 120

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
40 / 68
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — 717 717 0.12 0.01 — 724
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 717 717 0.12 0.01 — 724
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — 717 717 0.12 0.01 — 724
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 717 717 0.12 0.01 — 724
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — 119 119 0.02 < 0.005 — 120
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 119 119 0.02 < 0.005 — 120

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.16 0.08 1.3 0.57 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 1,709 1,709 0.15 < 0.005 — 1,713 Total 0.16 0.08 1.3 0.57 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 1,709 1,709 0.15 < 0.005 — 1,713 VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
41 / 68
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Single
Family
Housing

0.16 0.08 1.3 0.57 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 1,709 1,709 0.15 < 0.005 — 1,713 Total 0.16 0.08 1.3 0.57 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 1,709 1,709 0.15 < 0.005 — 1,713 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.03 0.01 0.25 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 283 283 0.03 < 0.005 — 284 Total 0.03 0.01 0.25 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 283 283 0.03 < 0.005 — 284

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
42 / 68
Single 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Family
Housing
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 92 92 0.01 < 0.005 — 93 Consum
er
Product
s

5.7 5.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.46 0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent

0.72 0.68 0.07 7.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 21 21 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 21 Total 6.9 6.9 0.07 7.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 113 113 0.02 < 0.005 — 114 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 92 92 0.01 < 0.005 — 93 Consum
er
Product
s

5.7 5.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
43 / 68
Architect
Coatings

0.46 0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 6.2 6.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 92 92 0.01 < 0.005 — 93 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 3.4 3.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.5 Consum
er
Product
s

1.0 1.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.08 0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent

0.06 0.06 0.01 0.70 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.7 1.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.7 Total 1.2 1.2 0.01 0.70 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 5.1 5.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.2

4.3.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 92 92 0.01 < 0.005 — 93 Consum
er
Product
s

5.7 5.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.46 0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
44 / 68
Landsca 0.72 0.68 0.07 7.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 21 21 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 21 pe
Total 6.9 6.9 0.07 7.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 113 113 0.02 < 0.005 — 114 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 92 92 0.01 < 0.005 — 93 Consum
er
Product
s

5.7 5.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s

1.0 1.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.08 0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
45 / 68
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 11 32 43 1.1 0.03 — 78
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 11 32 43 1.1 0.03 — 78
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 11 32 43 1.1 0.03 — 78
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 11 32 43 1.1 0.03 — 78
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 1.8 5.3 7.1 0.18 < 0.005 — 13
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 1.8 5.3 7.1 0.18 < 0.005 — 13

4.4.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 11 32 43 1.1 0.03 — 78
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 11 32 43 1.1 0.03 — 78
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
46 / 68
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 11 32 43 1.1 0.03 — 78
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 11 32 43 1.1 0.03 — 78
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 1.8 5.3 7.1 0.18 < 0.005 — 13
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 1.8 5.3 7.1 0.18 < 0.005 — 13

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 66 0.00 66 6.6 0.00 — 232
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 66 0.00 66 6.6 0.00 — 232
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 66 0.00 66 6.6 0.00 — 232
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 66 0.00 66 6.6 0.00 — 232
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
47 / 68
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 11 0.00 11 1.1 0.00 — 38
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 11 0.00 11 1.1 0.00 — 38

4.5.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 66 0.00 66 6.6 0.00 — 232
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 66 0.00 66 6.6 0.00 — 232
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 66 0.00 66 6.6 0.00 — 232
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 66 0.00 66 6.6 0.00 — 232
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 11 0.00 11 1.1 0.00 — 38
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 11 0.00 11 1.1 0.00 — 38

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
48 / 68
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.9 1.9
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.9 1.9
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.9 1.9
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.9 1.9
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.32 0.32
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.32 0.32

4.6.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.9 1.9
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.9 1.9
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
49 / 68
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.9 1.9
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.9 1.9
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.32 0.32
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.32 0.32

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.7.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
50 / 68
Equipm
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8.2. Mitigated
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
51 / 68
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
52 / 68

4.9.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetati
on
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
53 / 68

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
54 / 68
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetati
on
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
55 / 68
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
56 / 68
Subtotal——————————————————
Remove d——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
———————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Avoided——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
Remove d——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
———————————————————
Annual——————————————————
Avoided——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
Remove d——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
———————————————————

5. Activity Data
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
57 / 68

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/1/2026 10/8/2026 6.0 7.0 — Grading Grading 10/9/2026 11/7/2026 6.0 26 —
Building Construction Building Construction 11/9/2026 9/25/2027 6.0 276 — Paving Paving 9/27/2027 10/13/2027 6.0 15 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/14/2027 10/30/2027 6.0 15 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.0 8.0 367 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 4.0 8.0 84 0.37
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.0 148 0.41
Grading Excavators Diesel Average 2.0 8.0 36 0.38
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 2.0 8.0 84 0.37
Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 2.0 8.0 423 0.48
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.0 367 0.40 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.0 8.0 82 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.0 14 0.74 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 7.0 367 0.29 Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 8.0 46 0.45 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 3.0 7.0 84 0.37
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.0 8.0 81 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.0 8.0 89 0.36
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
58 / 68
Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.0 8.0 36 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.0 37 0.48

5.2.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.0 8.0 367 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 4.0 8.0 84 0.37
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.0 148 0.41
Grading Excavators Diesel Average 2.0 8.0 36 0.38
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 2.0 8.0 84 0.37
Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 2.0 8.0 423 0.48
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.0 367 0.40 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.0 8.0 82 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.0 14 0.74 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 7.0 367 0.29 Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 8.0 46 0.45 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 3.0 7.0 84 0.37
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.0 8.0 81 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.0 8.0 89 0.36
Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.0 8.0 36 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.0 37 0.48

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
59 / 68
Site Preparation Worker 18 17 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 11 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading Worker 20 17 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 11 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction Worker 49 17 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 15 11 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving Worker 15 17 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 11 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating Worker 9.9 17 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 11 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.3.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Site Preparation Worker 18 17 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 11 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading Worker 20 17 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
60 / 68
Grading Vendor — 11 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction Worker 49 17 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 15 11 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving Worker 15 17 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 11 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating Worker 9.9 17 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 11 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 540,979 180,326 0.00 0.00 —

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
61 / 68
Phase Name Material Imported (cy) Material Exported (cy) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (sq. ft.) Acres Paved (acres) Site Preparation — — 11 0.00 0.00
Grading — — 78 0.00 0.00
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.5

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.7. Construction Paving
Phase Name Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Paving Single Family Housing 1.5 0%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2026 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2027 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Single Family
Housing
1,348 1,348 1,348 491,999 14,391 14,391 14,391 5,252,834

5.9.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
62 / 68
Single Family 1,348 1,348 1,348 491,999 14,391 14,391 14,391 5,252,834 Housing

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths
Land Use Hearth Type Unmitigated (number) Mitigated (number) Single Family Housing Wood Fireplaces 0 0
Single Family Housing Gas Fireplaces 0 0
Single Family Housing Propane Fireplaces 0 0
Single Family Housing Electric Fireplaces 137 137
Single Family Housing No Fireplaces 0 0
Single Family Housing Conventional Wood Stoves 0 0
Single Family Housing Catalytic Wood Stoves 0 0
Single Family Housing Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0 0
Single Family Housing Pellet Wood Stoves 0 0

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
— Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
undefined 540,979 180,326 0.00 0.00 —

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
63 / 68
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Single Family Housing 1,280,482 204 0.0330 0.0040 5,330,988

5.11.2. Mitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Single Family Housing 1,282,690 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Single Family Housing 5,555,055 14,785,352

5.12.2. Mitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Single Family Housing 5,555,055 14,785,352

5.13. Operational Waste Generation
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
64 / 68

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Single Family Housing 123 0.00

5.13.2. Mitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Single Family Housing 123 0.00

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Single Family Housing Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.5 2.5 10.0
Single Family Housing Household
refrigerators and/or
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00

5.14.2. Mitigated
Land Use Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Single Family Housing Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.5 2.5 10.0
Single Family Housing Household
refrigerators and/or
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
65 / 68

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.15.2. Mitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
66 / 68

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

5.18.2.2. Mitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 22 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 0.00 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise — meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (Radke et al., 2017, CEC-500-2017-008), and consider inundation location and depth for the San Francisco Bay, the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and California coast resulting different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four scenarios to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four scenarios are: No rise, 0.5 meter, 1.0 meter, 1.41 meters Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
67 / 68
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

VTTM 7432- Mitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
68 / 68
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

8. User Changes to Default Data

8.1. Justifications
Screen Justification
Land Use The project lot acreage is 20.56 AC as provided by the Applicant.

Construction: Construction Phases According to the applicant, construction is expected to begin in October 2026 and conclude in October 2027, though exact start dates are unknown. Based on this timeline, construction is estimated to last 339 days.

Operations: Vehicle Data Weekday and weekend trip rates were updated based on the Traffic Analysis prepared by McIntosh & Associates, dated October 9, 2025.

Operations: Fleet Mix District accepted fleet mix for residential projects - 2027 operational year.

Operations: Hearths No wood, gas, or propane hearths are proposed. It is conservatively assumed that 100% of the units will include electric hearths.

VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
1 / 39
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2026) - Unmitigated

3.3. Grading (2026) - Unmitigated

3.5. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated

3.9. Paving (2027) - Unmitigated
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
2 / 39

3.11. Architectural Coating (2027) - Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
3 / 39

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
4 / 39

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
5 / 39

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

8. User Changes to Default Data

8.1. Justifications
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
6 / 39

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated
Construction Start Date 10/1/2026
Operational Year 2027
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.7
Precipitation (days) 18
Location 35.298896612009486, -119.1121487732313
County Kern-San Joaquin
City Bakersfield
Air District San Joaquin Valley APCD
Air Basin San Joaquin Valley
TAZ 2810
EDFZ 5
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.32

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2027 1.5 1.2 10 16 0.03 0.34 0.73 1.1 0.32 0.18 0.49 — 3,495 3,495 0.11 0.11 3.0 3,534 VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
8 / 39
Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2026 3.8 3.2 29 30 0.06 1.2 20 21 1.1 10 11 — 6,830 6,830 0.27 0.11 0.09 6,856 2027 112 112 10 15 0.03 0.34 0.73 1.1 0.32 0.18 0.49 — 3,418 3,418 0.11 0.11 0.08 3,453 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2026 0.53 0.44 3.8 4.6 0.01 0.15 1.1 1.3 0.14 0.48 0.62 — 1,024 1,024 0.04 0.02 0.21 1,031 2027 5.5 5.4 6.7 10 0.02 0.23 0.47 0.70 0.21 0.11 0.32 — 2,244 2,244 0.07 0.07 0.84 2,268 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2026 0.10 0.08 0.70 0.83 < 0.005 0.03 0.21 0.24 0.03 0.09 0.11 — 169 169 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 171 2027 1.0 0.98 1.2 1.9 < 0.005 0.04 0.09 0.13 0.04 0.02 0.06 — 372 372 0.01 0.01 0.14 375

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 4.8 4.3 4.0 48 0.11 0.07 10 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 — 11,433 11,433 0.53 0.46 33 11,617 Area 7.2 7.0 2.3 8.7 0.01 0.19 — 0.19 0.19 — 0.19 0.00 2,905 2,905 0.06 0.01 — 2,908 Energy 0.16 0.08 1.3 0.57 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 2,424 2,424 0.27 0.02 — 2,436 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 11 32 43 1.1 0.03 — 78
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 66 0.00 66 6.6 0.00 — 232
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.9 1.9
Total 12 11 7.7 58 0.13 0.36 10 10 0.36 2.5 2.9 77 16,795 16,872 8.6 0.51 35 17,274 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 4.3 3.7 4.7 37 0.10 0.07 10 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 — 10,225 10,225 0.58 0.50 0.86 10,390 Area 6.4 6.3 2.3 0.97 0.01 0.18 — 0.18 0.18 — 0.18 0.00 2,885 2,885 0.05 0.01 — 2,888 Energy 0.16 0.08 1.3 0.57 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 2,424 2,424 0.27 0.02 — 2,436 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 11 32 43 1.1 0.03 — 78
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 66 0.00 66 6.6 0.00 — 232
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.9 1.9
Total 11 10 8.3 38 0.12 0.36 10 10 0.35 2.5 2.9 77 15,566 15,643 8.6 0.55 2.8 16,026 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 4.3 3.8 4.3 38 0.10 0.07 10.0 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 — 10,560 10,560 0.55 0.48 14 10,731 Area 6.6 6.5 0.55 4.1 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 0.00 658 658 0.01 < 0.005 — 659 Energy 0.16 0.08 1.3 0.57 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 2,424 2,424 0.27 0.02 — 2,436 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 11 32 43 1.1 0.03 — 78
Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 66 0.00 66 6.6 0.00 — 232
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
10 / 39
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.9 1.9
Total 11 10 6.2 43 0.11 0.22 10.0 10 0.21 2.5 2.7 77 13,674 13,751 8.6 0.52 16 14,138 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.79 0.70 0.79 7.0 0.02 0.01 1.8 1.8 0.01 0.46 0.47 — 1,748 1,748 0.09 0.08 2.4 1,777 Area 1.2 1.2 0.10 0.74 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 109 109 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 109 Energy 0.03 0.01 0.25 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 401 401 0.04 < 0.005 — 403 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 1.8 5.3 7.1 0.18 < 0.005 — 13 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 11 0.00 11 1.1 0.00 — 38
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.32 0.32
Total 2.0 1.9 1.1 7.9 0.02 0.04 1.8 1.9 0.04 0.46 0.50 13 2,264 2,277 1.4 0.09 2.7 2,341

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.7 3.1 29 29 0.05 1.2 — 1.2 1.1 — 1.1 — 5,298 5,298 0.21 0.04 — 5,316 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 20 20 — 10 10 — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
11 / 39
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 203 203 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 205 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
12 / 39
Average — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.0 4.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.67 0.67 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.68 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.6 3.0 27 28 0.06 1.1 — 1.1 1.0 — 1.0 — 6,599 6,599 0.27 0.05 — 6,621 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 9.2 9.2 — 3.7 3.7 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
13 / 39
Off-Roa 0.26 0.22 1.9 2.0 < 0.005 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 470 470 0.02 < 0.005 — 472 d
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.66 0.66 — 0.26 0.26 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 232 232 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 235 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 17 17 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 17 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
14 / 39
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.8 2.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.3 1.1 9.9 13 0.02 0.38 — 0.38 0.35 — 0.35 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.16 0.13 1.2 1.6 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.04 — 0.04 — 298 298 0.01 < 0.005 — 299 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.03 0.02 0.22 0.29 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 49 49 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 50 VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
15 / 39
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.21 0.19 0.23 2.3 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 571 571 0.01 0.02 0.06 578 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.56 0.17 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.04 — 472 472 0.01 0.07 0.03 492 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 74 74 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.12 75 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 59 59 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 61 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12 12 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 12 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.7 9.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa d
Equipm
ent

1.2 1.0 9.4 13 0.02 0.34— 0.34 0.31— 0.31— 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02— 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Roa d
Equipm
ent

0.77 0.65 5.9 8.1 0.01 0.21— 0.21 0.19— 0.19— 1,509 1,509 0.06 0.01— 1,514 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual——————————————————
Off-Roa d
Equipm
ent

0.14 0.12 1.1 1.5 < 0.005 0.04— 0.04 0.04— 0.04— 250 250 0.01 < 0.005— 251 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.21 0.20 0.16 3.2 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.14 0.14— 638 638 0.01 0.02 1.9 647 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.51 0.16 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.04— 461 461 0.01 0.07 1.1 482 VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
17 / 39
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.19 0.18 0.21 2.1 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 560 560 0.01 0.02 0.05 567 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.54 0.17 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.04 — 461 461 0.01 0.07 0.03 481 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.12 0.11 0.12 1.5 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.09 0.09 — 366 366 0.01 0.01 0.52 371 Vendor 0.01 0.01 0.33 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.09 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 — 290 290 < 0.005 0.04 0.30 303 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 61 61 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 61 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 48 48 < 0.005 0.01 0.05 50 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Paving (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.88 0.74 6.9 10.0 0.01 0.30 — 0.30 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
18 / 39
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.88 0.74 6.9 10.0 0.01 0.30 — 0.30 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.04 0.03 0.29 0.41 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 62 62 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 62 Paving 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.01 0.01 0.05 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10 10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10 Paving 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 194 194 < 0.005 0.01 0.59 197 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
19 / 39
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 170 170 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 172 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.3 7.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.2 1.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.11. Architectural Coating (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.14 0.11 0.83 1.1 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
20 / 39
Architect 111 111 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ural
Coating
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.01 < 0.005 0.03 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.5 5.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.5 Architect
ural
Coating
s

4.6 4.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.84 0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 112 112 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 113 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
21 / 39
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.8 4.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.79 0.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.80 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.3 3.7 4.7 37 0.10 0.07 10 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 — 10,225 10,225 0.58 0.50 0.86 10,390 VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
22 / 39
Total 4.3 3.7 4.7 37 0.10 0.07 10 10 0.06 2.5 2.6 — 10,225 10,225 0.58 0.50 0.86 10,390 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.79 0.70 0.79 7.0 0.02 0.01 1.8 1.8 0.01 0.46 0.47 — 1,748 1,748 0.09 0.08 2.4 1,777 Total 0.79 0.70 0.79 7.0 0.02 0.01 1.8 1.8 0.01 0.46 0.47 — 1,748 1,748 0.09 0.08 2.4 1,777

4.2. Energy

0.16 0.08 1.3 0.57 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 1,709 1,709 0.15 < 0.005 — 1,713 Total 0.16 0.08 1.3 0.57 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.11 — 0.11 — 1,709 1,709 0.15 < 0.005 — 1,713 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing

0.03 0.01 0.25 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 283 283 0.03 < 0.005 — 284 Total 0.03 0.01 0.25 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 283 283 0.03 < 0.005 — 284

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.27 0.13 2.3 0.97 0.01 0.18 — 0.18 0.18 — 0.18 0.00 2,885 2,885 0.05 0.01 — 2,888 VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
24 / 39
Consum
Products

5.7 5.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.46 0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent

0.72 0.68 0.07 7.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 21 21 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 21 Total 7.2 7.0 2.3 8.7 0.01 0.19 — 0.19 0.19 — 0.19 0.00 2,905 2,905 0.06 0.01 — 2,908 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.27 0.13 2.3 0.97 0.01 0.18 — 0.18 0.18 — 0.18 0.00 2,885 2,885 0.05 0.01 — 2,888 Consum
er
Product
s

5.7 5.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.46 0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 6.4 6.3 2.3 0.97 0.01 0.18 — 0.18 0.18 — 0.18 0.00 2,885 2,885 0.05 0.01 — 2,888 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 107 107 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 107 Consum
er
Product
s

1.0 1.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coating
s

0.08 0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
25 / 39
Landsca 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.70 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.7 1.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.7 pe
Equipm
ent
Total 1.2 1.2 0.10 0.74 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 109 109 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 109

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 11 32 43 1.1 0.03 — 78
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 11 32 43 1.1 0.03 — 78
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 11 32 43 1.1 0.03 — 78
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 11 32 43 1.1 0.03 — 78
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 1.8 5.3 7.1 0.18 < 0.005 — 13
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 1.8 5.3 7.1 0.18 < 0.005 — 13

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
26 / 39

4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 66 0.00 66 6.6 0.00 — 232
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 66 0.00 66 6.6 0.00 — 232
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 66 0.00 66 6.6 0.00 — 232
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 66 0.00 66 6.6 0.00 — 232
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — 11 0.00 11 1.1 0.00 — 38
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 11 0.00 11 1.1 0.00 — 38

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
27 / 39
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.9 1.9
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.9 1.9
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.9 1.9
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.9 1.9
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Single
Family
Housing
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.32 0.32
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.32 0.32

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
29 / 39
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
30 / 39
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
31 / 39
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.0 8.0 367 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 4.0 8.0 84 0.37
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.0 148 0.41
Grading Excavators Diesel Average 2.0 8.0 36 0.38
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
32 / 39
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back Diesel Average 2.0 8.0 84 0.37 Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 2.0 8.0 423 0.48
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.0 367 0.40 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.0 8.0 82 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.0 14 0.74 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 7.0 367 0.29 Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 8.0 46 0.45 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 3.0 7.0 84 0.37
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.0 8.0 81 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.0 8.0 89 0.36
Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.0 8.0 36 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.0 37 0.48

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Site Preparation Worker 18 17 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 11 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading Worker 20 17 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 11 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction Worker 49 17 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 15 11 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20 HHDT
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
33 / 39
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving Worker 15 17 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 11 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating Worker 9.9 17 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 11 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (cy) Material Exported (cy) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (sq. ft.) Acres Paved (acres) Site Preparation — — 11 0.00 0.00
Grading — — 78 0.00 0.00
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.5

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
34 / 39
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.7. Construction Paving
Phase Name Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Paving Single Family Housing 1.5 0%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2026 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2027 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths
Land Use Hearth Type Unmitigated (number) Mitigated (number) Single Family Housing Wood Fireplaces 0 0
Single Family Housing Gas Fireplaces 137 137
Single Family Housing Propane Fireplaces 0 0
Single Family Housing Electric Fireplaces 0 0
Single Family Housing No Fireplaces 0 0
Single Family Housing Conventional Wood Stoves 0 0
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
35 / 39
Single Family Housing Catalytic Wood Stoves 0 0
Single Family Housing Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0 0
Single Family Housing Pellet Wood Stoves 0 0

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Single Family Housing 5,555,055 14,785,352
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
36 / 39

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Single Family Housing 123 0.00

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
37 / 39

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
38 / 39
Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (Radke et al., 2017, CEC-500-2017-008), and consider inundation location and depth for the San Francisco Bay, the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and California coast resulting different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four scenarios to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four scenarios are: No rise, 0.5 meter, 1.0 meter, 1.41 meters Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
VTTM 7432 - Unmitigated Custom Report, 11/14/2025
39 / 39
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

8. User Changes to Default Data

8.1. Justifications
Screen Justification
Land Use The project lot acreage is 20.56 AC as provided by the Applicant.

Operations: Vehicle Data Weekday and weekend trip rates were updated based on the Traffic Analysis prepared by McIntosh & Associates, dated October 9, 2025.

Operations: Fleet Mix District accepted fleet mix for residential projects - 2027 operational year.

Operations: Hearths It is assumed that 100% of the units will have natural gas hearths.

Attachment 2
Modeling Files (Electronic)

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE EVALUATION
General Plan Amendment/Zone Change
Assessor’s Parcel Map Number
544-040-03, -04, and -07
County of Kern
Bakersfield, California
Prepared for:

RGF Properties, LLC
Mr. Tom Dee
9100 Ming Avenue, Suite 120
Bakersfield, California 93311
Prepared by:

Pruett Biological Resource Consulting
8819 Latera Court
Bakersfield, California 93314
661.421.0006
27 January 2025
Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 544-040-03, -04, -07
January 2025

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Pruett Biological Resource Consulting, Inc. (PruettBio) has prepared this biological resource evaluation for a proposed Site Plan Review of Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 544-040-03, -04, and -07. The project consists of 63.97 gross acres (25.89 hectares)(project) Section 19, Township 30 South, Range 27 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian. The project is located northwest of the intersection of Panama Lane and Old River Rd, within the incorporated limits of the City of Bakersfield, County of Kern, California.

The project is located within the geographic range of several federal-, and state-listed, threatened and/or endangered plant and animal taxa. Several non-listed, special-status species also have the potential to occur in the vicinity of the project.

The purpose of this report is to document biological resources identified during a reconnaissance-level field study of the project site and include potential biological resources identified during a literature review of the site and vicinity, identify potential impacts to biological resources resulting from the project.

Evaluation of potential impacts to plant and animal species are required under federal and state regulation during a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Appendix G thresholds have been used to evaluate potential impacts to the biological resources from the proposed project development. Avoidance and minimization measures for implementation prior to and during project activities are recommended as appropriate.

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) have not been contacted regarding the preparation of this report. Appendix B, Special-Status Plant and Animal Evaluations, satisfy the requirements for an initial determination of potential impacts under the CEQA Appendix G thresholds. If CEQA threshold determinations warrant, further consultation may be required with CDFW and USFWS. If additional consultation with the agencies results in the need for Application for a California Incidental Take Permit, Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 783.2 outlines requirements for detailed species-specific take analysis, proposed measures to minimize and fully mitigate impacts, compliance monitoring, and funding. A detailed description satisfying Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 783.2 is not required to meet the CEQA Appendix G thresholds.

A literature review was conducted of the site and vicinity, prior to the field study, of the biological resources known to occur based on recorded, direct observation, or potentially occurring in the project impact area based on current or historical habitat conditions. During the field study, existing habitat conditions, direct observations and/or species sign was recorded to assess the potential for occurrence of special-status species. This report includes an evaluation of the potential for those special-status biological resources not observed during the field study, with the potential to occur on the property based on the habitat conditions observed.

The project is in southwest Bakersfield in an area historically farmed. Urban development has increased along the margins of Metropolitan Bakersfield in the past 50 years and has resulted in the conversion of farmland to residential and commercial properties. The project is entirely vacant land. The project is surrounded by residential development, commercial development, and vacant land.

The federal and state database queries yielded 21 special-status plant species and 33 special-status animal species as potentially occurring within the vicinity of the project site. Of these, 5 plant species, and 15 animal species have federal-, and/or state-listing and are afforded protection under federal or state law.

A query of the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) database was made for the nine-quadrangles surrounding the project. The CNPS tracks plant species that do not meet the CEQA Section 15380 criteria for listing as threatened or endangered and are afforded no protection under federal or state law.

A USGS nine-quadrangle query additionally includes a search area beyond a standard 10-mile radius.

Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 544-040-03, -04, -07
January 2025
Plant species meeting the criteria for Special Status Plants as defined in Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Sensitive Natural Communities (CDFW 2018) and evaluated under CEQA Section 15380 have been included in this report.

Some CRPR 4 taxa may meet the Section 15380 definition of an endangered, rare, or threatened species, and in the definition of CRPR 4, CNPS and CDFW suggest additional reasons for including CRPR 4 taxa in a CEQA analysis. These reasons include Regionally Rare Taxa. Considered locally significant plants, that is, plants that are not rare from a statewide perspective but are rare or uncommon in a local context such as within a county or region (CEQA Guidelines, § 15125, subd. (c)), or as designated in local or regional plans, policies, or ordinances (CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G). “Locally rare” has not been generally defined, but in counties where a “locally rare” policy exists, it applies to taxa with only five to 10 known occurrences in that county.

The CNDDB, iPac, and CNPS lists were cross-referenced for consistency. A separate CNDDB query for the County of Kern was also generated to evaluate plant species for local significance.

The project will not conflict with existing or adopted Habitat Conservation Plans, Natural Community Conservation Plans, local or regional conservation plans, or local ordinances protecting biological resources.

Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 544-040-03, -04, -07
January 2025
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................................1 PROJECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 PROJECT SETTING AND PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION....................................................................................................... 1 METHODS.............................................................................................................................................................2 LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................................................................ 2 FIELD STUDY ............................................................................................................................................................. 2 RESULTS ...............................................................................................................................................................3 VEGETATION COMMUNITIES AND LAND COVER...................................................................................................... 3 SOILS ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.......................................................................................................................................... 3 Special-Status Plant Species................................................................................................................................ 3 Special-Status Animal Species ............................................................................................................................. 4 Designated Critical Habitat ................................................................................................................................. 5 Jurisdictional Water Resource Features .............................................................................................................. 5 Special-Status Natural Communities................................................................................................................... 5 Wildlife Migration Corridors and Nursery Sites................................................................................................... 5 Regional and Local Policies.................................................................................................................................. 5 IMPACT ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES .......................................................................5 REFERENCES .........................................................................................................................................................9 APPENDIX A .......................................................................................................................................................12 PROJECT VICINTY AND SITE ................................................................................................................................12 APPENDIX B........................................................................................................................................................20 SPECIAL-STATUS PLANT AND ANIMAL EVALUATION...........................................................................................20 APPENDIX C........................................................................................................................................................34 PLANTS AND ANIMALS OBSERVED ON THE PROJECT ..........................................................................................34 Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 544-040-03, -04, -07
January 2025
1 INTRODUCTION
Pruett Biological Resource Consulting, Inc. (PruettBio) has prepared this biological resource evaluation for the proposed development of APNs 544-040-03, -04, and -07. The project consists of 63.97 gross acres (25.89 hectares)(project) Section 19, Township 30 South, Range 27 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian. The project is located northwest of the intersection of Panama Lane and Old River Road, within the incorporated limits of the City of Bakersfield, County of Kern, California. The report documents biological resources identified during fieldwork conducted on the project site and those identified through a literature search as potentially occurring based on known observations or historic habitat conditions.

The report uses the information collected during the field study and literature search to evaluate potential impacts to biological resources, resulting from the project. The report is intended to assist in the analysis of the proposed project for a Site Plan Review.

Listed plant and animal species are protected under the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) and the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). Protection of other non-listed, special-status species is afforded under additional regulation including the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) impacts to non-listed, special-status species must be evaluated. Where necessary, the report recommends avoidance and minimization measures for implementation prior to and during project activities. The report is intended to provide technical information in support of a CEQA preliminary review. For the purposes of this report, potential impacts to the biological resources of the proposed project were evaluated in accordance with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines (2025).

PROJECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The project consists of 63.97 gross acres (25.89 hectares) of APNs 544-040-03, -04, and -07. The project site is located northwest of the intersection of Panama Lane and Old River Road, Section 19, Township 30 South, Range 27 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian.

PROJECT SETTING AND PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
The project site is in the southern San Joaquin Valley; a broad, treeless plain in the rain shadow of the Inner Coast Ranges. The region’s climate can be characterized as Mediterranean; with hot, dry summers and cool, moist winters. Summer high temperatures typically exceed 100 °Fahrenheit (°F); with an average of 110 days per year over 90 °F. Winter temperatures in the San Joaquin Valley are mild, with an average of only 16 days per year with frost (Twisselmann 1967).

Rainfall varies, increasing from west to east, with the west side of the valley receiving an average of around 4 inches (10 centimeters) per year and the east side averaging about 6 inches (15 centimeters) per year. Winter fog, called Tule fog, sometimes forms during the months of November, December, and January, supplementing the annual precipitation. Approximately 90% of the rainfall in the region occurs between November 1 and April 1. Drought cycles occur periodically, becoming severe enough that plant and animal populations can experience large fluctuations. The vegetation communities in the San Joaquin Valley are distinguishable from the Mojave Desert to the east due to Tule fog, higher humidity, and isolation from continental climatic influences by mountain ranges (Twisselmann 1967).

The general topography of the area of the project is generally flat at about 351 feet (107 meters) above mean sea level. The project and vicinity were historically farmed for decades. Historical aerial imagery going back to 1985 shows the project with much of the surrounding land under row crops. By 2003, residential development began in the vicinity of the project. From aerial imagery, the project appears to not have been farmed since 2003 or earlier but has been vegetation has been managed on site by occasional discing. The project is surrounded by mixed residential and commercial development and limited vacant land.

Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 544-040-03, -04, -07
January 2025
2 METHODS

LITERATURE REVIEW
PruettBio conducted a literature review to identify known observations and potential for listed, or otherwise special-status, species to occur in the vicinity of the project site. A standard, 10-mile (16- kilometer) radius query was performed. Database records reviewed included:
• United States Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) iPac: The iPac report generates a list of federal-listed species and other resources under the jurisdiction of the USFWS, including designated critical habitat for listed species, National Wildlife Refuge lands, and Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory. The list includes resources that are outside of the project site, but that have the potential to be impacted by project activities. • USFWS National Wetlands Inventory: The Wetlands Mapper is an online inventory integrating digital map data and other resources to provide current information regarding the status of national wetlands, riparian, and deepwater habitats.
• United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) WebSoil Survey: The report is an online database providing soil data produced by the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the USDA and other federal, state, and local agencies. The information drawn for the Soil Survey of Kern County, California, Northwestern Part was originally drawn from fieldwork completed in 1981 with soil names and descriptions approved in 1982, and most recently updated September 2024.
• California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB-RareFind 5): The CNDDB is a database of listed, or otherwise special-status, plant and animal species and sensitive communities maintained by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). The information queried for this report included a standard 10-mile radius of the project site. • California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants:

CNPS is a private, professional organization that maintains a database evaluating the current conservation status of California’s rare, threatened, and endangered plant species. The information queried for this report included a standard 10-mile radius of the project site. The list includes resources that are outside of the project site, but that have the potential to be impacted by project activities based on known historic or current habitat features. The data base was compared to the CNDDB and iPac queries for consistency.

FIELD STUDY
A reconnaissance-level, biological field study was conducted by Jacob Spriester on 04 January 2025. The project was surveyed by walking the perimeter and transects to evaluate all representative habitat features of the site. The field study conducted, allowed for 100% visual coverage of the project site. Field notes included observations of all plant and wildlife species observed. Direct observations and/or species sign was recorded to assess the potential for occurrence. Land cover types and general habitat conditions were recorded and photographed. Special-status species and habitat features, such as vegetation communities or ephemeral channels, were also recorded and photographed if observed.

Coordinates for important biological resource elements and direct observations of special-status species were recorded using a handheld geographic positioning system unit. If observed, San Joaquin kit fox (SJKF) dens were classified as defined by the USFWS Standardized Recommendations for Protection of the Endangered San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior to or During Ground Disturbance (2011). All plant taxa encountered were identified to the extent possible given the diagnostic features present. Identifications were made using keys contained in The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California and online updates containing revisions to taxonomic treatments (Baldwin et al. 2012; Jepson Flora Project 2015).

Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 544-040-03, -04, -07
January 2025
3 RESULTS
This section summarizes the results of the field study conducted on the project site and evaluates those results for the known or potential for occurrence of special-status species based on the literature review and database queries and pursuant to statutory regulation. Discussions are provided describing the existing habitat conditions including vegetation communities, land cover and current use; soils; specialstatus biological resources potentially occurring in the vicinity of the project site; the potential for jurisdictional resources including designated critical habitat and riparian/wetland/water resource features; the potential for wildlife migration corridors and nursery sites; and regional and local policy.

VEGETATION COMMUNITIES AND LAND COVER
The project site is located at the southwestern part of Metropolitan Bakersfield city limits. Before conversion to farmland, the original vegetive communities of the project site were Non-native Grassland (Holland 42200) and Valley Saltbush Scrub (Holland 36220). The project and vicinity were historically farmed for decades. Aerial imagery shows that the last time that the project had row crops was 2003 or earlier and appears to have been vacant since. The project has been disced occasionally to manage vegetation and resulted in ruderal or invasive species dominating the project, and was disced recently at the time of the field study. The project is surrounded by residential and commercial development with some vacant land where vegetation is also managed.

SOILS
The USGS soil survey map describes the soil of the project site as Unit 127, Granoso sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, overwash and Unit 174 Kimberlina fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes MRLA 17 (NRCS 2025). Unit 127 is alluvium derived from mixed rock sources found on alluvial fans and flood plains. It is comprised of sandy loam, loamy sand, and sand to a depth of about 62 inches. The depth to the restrictive feature is more than 80 inches and the available water supply in profile is listed as low (about 4.9 inches). Unit 174 is alluvium derived from igneous and sedimentary rock found on alluvial fans.

It is comprised of fine sandy loam and silt loam to a depth of 71 inches. The depth to the restrictive feature is more than 80 inches and the available water supply in profile is listed as moderate (about 8.7 inches).

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
The literature review and database queries yielded 21 special-status plant species as potentially occurring within the vicinity of the project site. 33 special-status animal species were identified as potentially occurring in the region of the project site. No special-status animals or plants were observed on site during the field study. No evidence of any locally rare plant was observed during the field study.

No focused, protocol-level surveys were conducted for the preparation of this report. The field study was conducted outside of the blooming period for many of the special-status plant species potentially occurring in the vicinity of the project. The evaluation of special-status species that were found during the literature review with a potential to occur in the region are included in Appendix B.

Special-Status Plant Species
The federal and state database queries yielded 21 special-status plant species as potentially occurring within the vicinity of the project site. A query of the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) database was made for the nine-quadrangles surrounding the project. A USGS nine-quadrangle query additionally includes a search area beyond a standard 10-mile radius. Plant species meeting the criteria for Special Status Plants as defined in Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Sensitive Natural Communities (CDFW 2018) were evaluated under CEQA Section 15380.

Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 544-040-03, -04, -07
January 2025
4 Special-status plant species considered in this evaluation include all plant species that meet one or more of the following criteria:
• Listed or proposed for listing as threatened or endangered under ESA or candidates for possible future listing as threatened or endangered under the ESA (50 CFR §17.12). • Listed or candidates for listing by the State of California as threatened or endangered under CESA (Fish and Game Code §2050 et seq.). A species, subspecies, or variety of plant is endangered when the prospects of its survival and reproduction in the wild are in immediate jeopardy from one or more causes, including loss of habitat, change in habitat, over-exploitation, predation, competition, disease, or other factors (Fish and Game Code §2062). A plant is threatened when it is likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future in the absence of special protection and management measures (Fish and Game Code §2067). • Listed as rare under the California Native Plant Protection Act (Fish and Game Code §1900 et seq.). A plant is rare when, although not presently threatened with extinction, the species, subspecies, or variety is found in such small numbers throughout its range that it may be endangered if its environment worsens (Fish and Game Code §1901). • Meet the definition of rare or endangered under CEQA §15380(b) and (d). Species that may meet the definition of rare or endangered include the following:
o Species considered by the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) to be “rare, threatened or endangered in California” (Lists 1A, 1B and 2);
o Species that may warrant consideration on the basis of local significance or recent biological information.
o Some species included on the California Natural Diversity Database’s (CNDDB) Special Plants, Bryophytes, and Lichens List (California Department of Fish and Game 2008). • Considered a locally significant species, that is, a species that is not rare from a statewide perspective but is rare or uncommon in a local context such as within a county or region (CEQA §15125 (c)) or is so designated in local or regional plans, policies, or ordinances (CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G). Examples include a species at the outer limits of its known range or a species occurring on an uncommon soil type.

Of the 21 special-status plant species returned during database queries for the project vicinity, 5 species are either federally- or state-listed as threatened or endangered. Although CEQA requires consideration for impacts to locally significant plant species, no mitigation is legally required to compensate for impacts to non-listed plant species. No listed, or otherwise special-status plant species was observed during the fieldwork conducted for the preparation of this report. No listed, or otherwise special-status plant species, has been recorded as occurring within the project site.

Special-Status Animal Species
Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 544-040-03, -04, -07
January 2025
5 The federal and state database queries yielded 33 special-status animal species as potentially occurring within the vicinity of the project site. Of these, 15 animal species have federal-, and/or state-listing and are afforded protection under federal or state law. Special-status animal species considered in this evaluation include those that may occur in the project vicinity that have statutory protections. This includes federal- and state-listed (rare, threatened, or endangered; fully protected) species and candidates for listing under the respective endangered species acts. Species that are of special concern to the CDFW or the USFWS are included in this evaluation. Special-status bird species that are afforded protection under the MBTA which may nest on or within an approximate 10-mile (16-kilometer) radius of the project site are also evaluated. No evidence of special-status animal species, or animal species sign was observed during the field study.

Designated Critical Habitat
The USFWS iPac report and USFWS Designated Critical Habitat Mapper lists no Designated Critical Habitat within the project (USFWS 2025). Designated Critical Habitats closest to the project site include California condor (Gymnogyps californianus) approximately 26-miles south/southeast and Buena Vista Lake shrew (Sorex ornatus relictus) approximately 11-miles west of the project site. No suitable habitat for either species exists on the project site.

Jurisdictional Water Resource Features
Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) regulates discharge of dredged and fill material into Waters of the United States. Wetlands are included under this jurisdiction. Proposed activities that may result in discharge of material into Waters of the U.S. require a permit review process by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as set forth under CWA section 404(b)(1). Fish and Game Code section 1602 requires any person, state or local governmental agency, or public utility to notify CDFW before beginning any activity that will substantially modify a river, stream, or lake.

A search of the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory resulted in no riparian, wetlands, or other jurisdictional water features mapped on the project site (USFWS 2025). These results are consistent with the observed conditions within the survey area.

Special-Status Natural Communities
No special-status vegetation communities on the project site were identified by the USFWS iPac query, the CNDDB, or the CNPS Inventory (USFWS 2025, CDFW 2025, CNPS 2025). These results are consistent with the observed conditions within the survey area.

Wildlife Migration Corridors and Nursery Sites
Wildlife corridors can be defined as connections between wildlife blocks that meet specific habitat needs for species movement generally during migratory periods but seasonally as well. Wildlife corridors generally contain habitat dissimilar to the surrounding vicinity and include examples such as riparian areas along rivers and streams, washes, canyons, or otherwise undisturbed areas within urbanization.

Corridor width requirements can vary based on the needs of the species utilizing them. Development of the project would not impact wildlife migration corridors or nursery sites.

Regional and Local Policies
The proposed, modified project will not conflict with existing or adopted Habitat Conservation Plans, Natural Community Conservation Plans, local or regional conservation plans, or local ordinances protecting biological resources.

IMPACT ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES
Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 544-040-03, -04, -07
January 2025
6 CEQA Appendix G thresholds have been used to evaluate potential impacts to the biological resources from the proposed project. Appendix G provides an analysis of the impacts of the proposed project following the standards of CEQA and provides recommendations that, when implemented, would reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. It is important to note that potential take of any federal- or statelisted species from project activities would require contacting the appropriate wildlife agency (the USFWS and/or the CDFW).

The project would create a significant impact to biological resources, based on the specifications in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, if the following were to occur:

1. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service;

2. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service;

3. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means;

4. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites;

5. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance;

6. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.

The following analysis discusses potential impacts associated with the development of the project and provides recommendations where appropriate to further reduce potential impacts.

1. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, by the CDFW, or the USFWS? Direct and indirect impacts, in the form of “incidental take” of a threatened, endangered, or otherwise protected species, are not expected as a result of the development of the proposed project.

Implementation of standard measures for the protection of biological resources are recommended to avoid and minimize potential impact to general wildlife. These measures include, but may not be limited to:

Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 544-040-03, -04, -07
January 2025
7 • A biological resource pre-activity survey conducted by a qualified biologist no more that 30- days before the start of construction activities,
• Biological resource monitoring during each initial phase of ground disturbance, • Compliance reporting provided to the required oversight agencies for all biological resource field surveys, monitoring, and additional tasks as warranted.

If known or natal SJKF dens are identified at any time during construction, protocols enumerated in the USFWS Standardized Recommendations for Protection of the Endangered San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior to or During Ground Disturbance (2011) should be implemented, and the appropriate agencies contacted for guidance.

The project is within the historic range of Tipton kangaroo rat. The project was not included in the southwest focus area for the species in the previous habitat conservation plan. The most recent habitat suitability modeling (Cypher et al. 2021) includes the project site as Habitat rank 4 meaning that it disturbed habitat but suitable. Trapping would be required to confirm small mammal species occupying the project.

2. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations, or by the CDFW or the USFWS?
No riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or United States Fish and Wildlife Service exists on the project site. No adverse effect will occur as a result of the development of the proposed project and no mitigation measures are recommended.

3. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No features, identified in wetland categories, appear on the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory mapping (USFWS 2025) on the proposed, modified project site. No federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act were identified during the field study conducted for the preparation of this report. No substantial adverse effect will occur as a result of the development of the project. No mitigation measures are recommended.

4. Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? No migratory wildlife corridors were identified during the literature search or field study. The project will not interfere substantially with the movement of any native fish of wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. The following recommendations are provided for the general protection of bird species that may occur on the project site or vicinity in compliance with the MBTA:

If ground-disturbing activities are planned during the nesting season for migratory birds that may nest on or near the site (generally February 1 through August 31), nesting bird surveys are recommended prior to the commencement of ground disturbance for project activities. If nesting birds are present, no new construction or ground disturbance should occur within an appropriate avoidance area for that species until young have fledged, unless otherwise approved and monitored by a qualified onsite biologist.

Appropriate avoidance should be determined by a qualified biologist. In general, minimum avoidance zones for active nests should be implemented as follows: 1) ground or low-shrub nesting non-raptors – 300 feet (91 meters); 2) burrowing owl – as appropriate based on nest location, existing surrounding activity, and evaluation of owl behavior. Coordination with CDFW may be warranted. 3) Sensitive raptors (e.g., prairie falcon, golden eagle) – 0.5 miles (0.8 kilometers); 3) other raptors – 500 feet (152 meters).

Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 544-040-03, -04, -07
January 2025
8 5. Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? There are no biological resources on the site which are protected by local policies. Impacts from conflicts with local policies will not occur. No additional mitigation measures are recommended.

6. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.

The project does not conflict with any Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. No additional mitigation measures are recommended.

Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 544-040-03, -04, -07
January 2025
9 REFERENCES
Baldwin, B. G., Goldman, D. H., Keil, D. J., Patterson, R., Rosatti, T. J., & Wilken, D. H. (Eds.). (2012).

The Jepson manual: Vascular plants of California (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1568 pp.

CDFG. (2009). Protocols for surveying and evaluating impacts to special status native plant populations and natural communities. Sacramento, CA: Author. 7 pp.

CDFG. (2012). Staff report on burrowing owl mitigation. Sacramento, CA: Author.

CNDDB. (2025). Occurrence for U.S. Geologic Survey 7.5 minute quadrangles. Sacramento, CA: CDFW California Endangered Species Act of 1970, C.F.G.C § 2050 et seq. (2025).

California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, 13 P.R.C. § 21000 et seq. (2025).

California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 Guidelines, 14 C.C.R. § 15000 et seq. (2025).

California Native Plant Society (CNPS). (2023). Inventory of rare and endangered plants (Online edition, v8-01a) 7.5 minute quadrangles and corresponding plant species accounts. Sacramento, CA: Author.

California Native Plant Protection Act of 1977, C.F.G.C § 1904 et seq. (2025).

Clean Water Act of 1972, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. (2025).

Cypher, B., Phillips, S.E., Westall, T., Tennant, E.N., Saslaw, L., Kelly, E., Van Horn Job, C. (2021).

Conservation of endangered Tipton kangaroo rat (Dipodomys nitratoides nitratoides): status surveys, habitat suitability, and conservation recommendations. California Fish and Wildlife Special CESA Issue:382-397.

Dunn, J. L., & Alderfer, J., (Eds.). (2008). Field guide to the birds of western North America. Washington, DC: National Geographic Society. 447 pp.

Ehrlich, P. R., Dobkin, D. S., & Wheye, D. (1988). The birder’s handbook: A field guide to the natural history of North American birds. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, Inc. 785 pp.

Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq. (2025).

Harris, J. H., & Stearns, D. M. (1991). Population density, census methods, habitat relationships, and home range of the San Joaquin antelope squirrel, 1988–89. California Department of Fish and Game, Nongame Bird and Mammal Section, Report 91-02. Oakland, CA: CDFG. Retrieved from http://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=2953
Jennings, M. R., Hayes, M. P., & Metro Washington Park Zoo. (1994). Amphibian and reptile species of special concern in California (Final report to the California Department of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division, Contract No. 8023). Rancho Cordova, CA: CDFG. 255 pp.

Jepson Flora project (Eds.). (2015). Jepson eFlora. Retrieved from http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html Luce, B. (2005). Eumops perotis: Western mastiff bat. In C. Chambers & M. Herder, (Eds.), Species accounts. Portland, OR: Western Bat Working Group. 5 pp. Retrieved from http://www.wbwg.org/speciesinfo/species_accounts/molossidae/eupe.pdf Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 544-040-03, -04, -07
January 2025
10 Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, 16 U.S.C. § 703 et seq. (2025).

Nafis, G. (2000–2021a). North American legless lizards - Anniella. A Guide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of California. Retrieved from http://www.californiaherps.com/lizards/pages/a.pulchra.html Nafis, G. (2000–2021b). San Joaquin coachwhip – Coluber flagellum ruddocki. A Guide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of California. Retrieved from
http://www.californiaherps.com/snakes/pages/c.f.ruddocki.html Nafis, G. (2000–2021c). Blainville’s horned lizard – Phrynosoma blainvillii. A Guide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of California. Retrieved from http://www.californiaherps.com/lizards/pages/p.blainvillii.html Native Fish and Wildlife Endangered Species, 32 Fed. Reg. 4001 (Mar. 11, 1967). Retrieved from http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/federal_register/fr18.pdf
Papenfuss, T. J., Parham, J. F. (2013). Four new species of California legless lizards (Anniella). Breviora 536, 1–17. Retrieved from
http://mczbase.mcz.harvard.edu/specimen_images/publications/Breviora_536.pdf Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, C.W.A. § Section 13000 et seq. (2023).

Reid, F. A. (2006). Mammals of North America (Peterson field guide). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company. 579 pp.

Sherwin, R. (2005). Antrozous pallidus: Pallid bat. In D. A. Rambaldini, (Eds.). Species accounts.

Portland, OR: Western Bat Working Group. 5 pp. Retrieved from http://www.wbwg.org/speciesinfo/species_accounts/vespertilonidae/anpa.pdf Shuford, W. D., Gardali, T., (with Comrack, L.A.). (Eds.). (2008). California bird species of special concern: a ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate conservation concern in California. Sacramento, CA: CDFG.

Stebbins, R. C. (1985). A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians (Peterson field guide), (2nd ed.).

Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company. 336 pp.

Stebbins, R. C. (2003). A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians (Peterson field guide), (3rd ed.).

Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company. 533 pp.

Twisselmann, E. C. (1967). A flora of Kern County, California. The Wasmann Journal of Biology, 25, 1– 395.

Uptain, C. E. (1989). Survey for Tipton kangaroo rats (Dipodomys nitratoides nitratoides) on the proposed Delano prison site, Kern County, California (Prepared for the California Department of Corrections).

Sacramento, CA: 11 pp.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). (1996). California condor recovery plan, third revision. Portland, OR: Author. 62 pp.

USFWS. (1998). Recovery plan for upland species of the San Joaquin Valley, California. Portland, OR:

Author. Retrieved from http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/980930a.pdf USFWS. (2011). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service standardized recommendations for protection of the endangered San Joaquin kit fox prior to or during ground disturbance. Sacramento, CA: Author. 9 pp.

Retrieved from http://www.fws.gov/sacramento/es/Survey-ProtocolsGuidelines/Documents/kitfox_standard_rec_2011.pdf Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 544-040-03, -04, -07
January 2025
11 USFWS. (2013). California condor recovery program population size and distribution, December 31, 2013 overview page. Retrieved from
http://www.fws.gov/uploadedFiles/Region_8/NWRS/Zone_1/Hopper_Mountain_Complex/Hopper_Mounta in/Sections/News/News_Items/PDFs/2013-12-31.pdf
USFWS. (2023a). Federal endangered and threatened species that may occur in or may be affected by project in the counties and/or USGS 7 ½ minute quads you requested: quadrangle [August]. Author.

Retrieved from http://www.fws.gov/sacramento/es_species/Lists/es_species_lists-form.cfm USFWS. (2023b). National Wetlands Inventory Website [August]. Washington, D.C.: Author. Retrieved from http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/
Williams, D. F. (1980). Distribution and population status of the San Joaquin antelope squirrel and giant kangaroo rat. (Nongame Wildlife Investigation Final Report E-W-4). Sacramento, CA: CDFG. 48 pp.

Williams, D. F. (1986). Mammalian species of special concern in California (Prepared for the State of California, The Resources Agency Department of Fish and Game). Turlock, CA: CSUS. 112 pp. Retrieved from http://esrp.csustan.edu/resources/publications/pdf/mammalian_scc_ca_esrp5.pdf Zeiner, D. C., Laudenslayer, W. F., Jr., Mayer, K. E., & White, M., (Eds.). (1990a). California’s wildlife volume II birds (California Statewide Wildlife Habitat Relationships System). Sacramento, CA: CDFG.

Zeiner, D. C., Laudenslayer, W. F., Jr., Mayer, K. E., & White, M., (Eds.). (1990b). California’s wildlife volume III mammals (California Statewide Wildlife Habitat Relationships System). Sacramento, CA:

CDFG.

APPENDIX A

PROJECT VICINTY AND SITE
Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 544-040-03, -04, -07
January 2025
Figure A-1. Aerial photograph of the project and vicinity (Google Earth Pro 2025).

Bakersfield
Project Site
Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 544-040-03, -04, -07
January 2025
14 Figure A-2. Aerial photograph of the project and vicinity (Google Earth Pro 2025).

Legend
Project boundary
1000 ft
N
䡹
Biological Resource Evaluation
APN 544-040-03, -04, -07
January 2025
Figure A-3 Soil map of the project site (USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service 2025).

Soil Map—Kern County, California, Northwestern Part
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
1/6/2025

Page 1 of 3 ends

Bakersfield City CouncilAugust 5, 2026

Bakersfield City Council
August 5, 2026