Banning City Council
January 14, 2025

• Are there recommended changes to the TUMF based on the findings? If so, what is the potential impact to the TUMF collection and home owners? Yes, it is recommended that smaller homes pay a fee based on home size. The appropriate fee should be evaluated by the TUMF fee consultant to determine the potential impact to fee collected compared to the current fee expectation. Smaller homes paying less could potentially make home ownership less expensive overall compared to larger homes.

Data Collection
This section describes the data that were used to evaluate the trip generation. Specifically, the identification and selection of study areas, method for obtaining and results of the travel activity, and collection of residential characteristics.

Study Area Selection
To determine the home characteristics that might influence trip generation, representative residential neighborhoods in each of the TUMF zones were identified. The criteria used for selecting neighborhoods included the following:
• Residential land use could be isolated from other uses • Minimal cut through traffic
• As close to Census Blocks or Block Groups as possible to obtain demographic information • Minimal construction activity that would change the number of units • Diverse home size, household income
Based on local knowledge, aerial photos, Census geography, and home information from Zillow, WRCOG staff identified a preliminary list of potential study locations in each TUMF zone. Through discussions and review of each location, Fehr & Peers narrowed down the list of study locations to 23 neighborhoods, shown on Figure 1.

Travel Activity
StreetLight Data from smart phones were collected at 23 residential neighborhoods shown on Figure 1 were collected for trips that started or ended within each neighborhood. This method excluded trips that cut through the neighborhood. To avoid holidays, vacations, and to reflect travel when school is in session, data from March 1st through April 30th and September 1st through October 31st for all weekdays in 2019 were collected to represent the average vehicle trips per day for all homes within each study area.

Since StreetLight Data are based on location-based services (LBS) derived from cellular phone applications, 48-hour traffic counts were conducted at eight of the 23 study area locations as a point of comparison. The eight representative count locations were selected to have at least one 377
Suzanne Peterson, Christopher Gray, and Chris Tzeng – WRCOG November 16, 2022

location in each TUMF zone, minimize the number of roadways accessing the land use, and to allow the most accurate representation of trips associated with the residential homes without capturing cut through traffic. The eight locations where 48-hour counts were collected are shown on Figure 2.

As shown on Figure 3, the 48-hour traffic count variation from day to day and the StreetLight Data average are very similar, giving confidence that the StreetLight Data for all study areas would be representative.

Residential Characteristics
The number of homes and characteristics for the homes within each study area were obtained from multiple sources, as summarized in Table 1. To identify outliers and the range of values for each variable that would be used to estimate the trip generation, plots of each study location by TUMF zone were developed and are summarized below with reference to the appropriate figure. • Figure 4 – Median Square Footage: good distribution across study areas and within each TUMF zone
• Figure 5 – Average Persons per Household: good distribution across study areas and within each TUMF zone
• Figure 6 – Average Children per Household: good distribution across study areas and within each TUMF zone, including one study area that has very high children per household and another study area that has very low children per household • Figure 7 – Average Workers per Household: good distribution across study areas and within each TUMF zone
• Figure 8 – Median Cost per Square Foot: good distribution across study areas and within each TUMF zone
Based on the review of each variable, the range across the study areas and within each TUMF zone are appropriate for use in the trip generation analysis.

Trip Generation Results
The StreetLight Data daily vehicle trips were used to visually display the relationship of each home characteristic for each study area and within each TUMF zone. The appropriate figure number and conclusion for the relationship are listed below.
• Figure 9 – Daily Vehicle Trips per Median Square Footage: slight increase in vehicle trips as median square footage increases
• Figure 10 – Daily Vehicle Trips per Average Persons per Household: slight increase in vehicle trips as total number of people per household increases 378
Suzanne Peterson, Christopher Gray, and Chris Tzeng – WRCOG November 16, 2022

• Figure 11 – Daily Vehicle Trips per Average Children per Household: slight increase in vehicle trips as average number of children per household increases • Figure 12 – Daily Vehicle Trips per Average Workers per Household: slight increase in vehicle trips as average number of workers per household increases • Figure 13 – Daily Vehicle Trips per Median Cost per Square Foot: no clear relationship between average number of workers and trip generation
In addition to visual representations of the data, statistical analysis was performed to obtain the correlation between the variables to daily vehicle trips and to determine the regression equations.

Figure 16 – Correlation Matrix for All Variables: the correlation values in the green box for average and median home size of 0.7 indicate a strong positive correlation and mean as home size increases the number of trips increase. The correlation value of 0.7 results in an R-square of

0.49, meaning nearly half of the increase in trip generation is related to home size.

Based on Figures 10 and 11, the relationship between trip generation appeared to be linear, with the relationship possibly changing around 2,500 square feet. The linear regression analysis of average home size was performed for all home sizes, homes 2,500 square feet or smaller, and homes larger than 2,500 square feet. The results of the analysis are summarized in Table 2. The results show for home sizes of 2,500 square feet or less, the influence of the home size (represented by the coefficient) is nearly double that when all home sizes are included in the regression. The nearly zero coefficient and very high constant for the regression of home sizes above 2.500 square feet indicate that the trip generation is nearly constant for homes above 2,500 square feet.

Recommendations and Next Steps
Although home characteristics other than square footage have a slight increase in trip generation, the ability to forecast or control all of the characteristics other than home square footage is very difficult. Based on the results of trip generation and discussions with WRCOG regarding the feasible size of homes being constructed in the region, WRCOG will work with the TUMF fee consultant to identify and recommend appropriate fee adjustments based on square footage. 379
BLM
Cleveland NF
San Jacinto
Wildlife
Area

ANAHEIM

BANNING

BEAUMONT

CALIMESA

CANYON LAKE
CHINO
CHINO
HILLS
CORONA

EASTVALE
HEMET
IRVINE

JURUPA VALLEY

LAGUNA HILLS

LAGUNA NIGUEL

LAKE ELSINORE LAKE FOREST

MENIFEE

MISSION
VIEJO

MORENO VALLEY

MURRIETA
NORCO

ONTARIO
PERRIS

RANCHO SANTA

MARGARITA

RIVERSIDE

SAN JACINTO

WILDOMAR

YORBA LINDA
·243
·241
·91
·71
·83
·74
·60
·79
&%215
"!5
"!10
"!15
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
21 22
23 20
StreetLight Data Collection Locations
Study Location by TUMF Zone
Central
Hemet/San Jacinto
Northwest
Pass
Southwest
City Boundaries
Figure 1
380
BLM
Cleveland NF
San Jacinto
Wildlife
Area

ANAHEIM

BANNING

BEAUMONT

CALIMESA

CANYON LAKE
CHINO
CHINO
HILLS
CORONA

EASTVALE
HEMET
IRVINE

JURUPA VALLEY

LAGUNA HILLS

LAGUNA NIGUEL

LAKE ELSINORE LAKE FOREST

MENIFEE

MISSION
VIEJO

MORENO VALLEY

MURRIETA
NORCO

ONTARIO
PERRIS

RANCHO SANTA

MARGARITA

RIVERSIDE

SAN JACINTO

WILDOMAR

YORBA LINDA
·243
·241
·91
·71
·83
·74
·60
·79
&%215
"!5
"!10
"!15
1 6
11 14
15 18
23 20
Traffic Count Data Collection Locations
Study Location by TUMF Zone
Central
Hemet/San Jacinto
Northwest
Pass
Southwest
City Boundaries
Figure 2
381
Suzanne Peterson, Christopher Gray, and Chris Tzeng – WRCOG November 16, 2022

Figure 3 – Comparison of Individual Traffic Counts and StreetLight Data Average Note: Red and green are the two days of manual count collection and blue are the StreetLight Data average. The BG number corresponds to the number on Figure 2.

Figure 4 – Median Square Footage
382
Suzanne Peterson, Christopher Gray, and Chris Tzeng – WRCOG November 16, 2022

Figure 5 – Average Persons per Household
Figure 6 – Average Children per Household
383
Suzanne Peterson, Christopher Gray, and Chris Tzeng – WRCOG November 16, 2022

Figure 7 – Average Workers per Household
Figure 8 – Median Cost per Square Foot
384
Suzanne Peterson, Christopher Gray, and Chris Tzeng – WRCOG November 16, 2022

Figure 9 – Daily Vehicle Trips per Median Square Footage Figure 10 – Daily Vehicle Trips per Average Persons per Household 385
Suzanne Peterson, Christopher Gray, and Chris Tzeng – WRCOG November 16, 2022

Figure 11 – Daily Vehicle Trips per Average Children per Household Figure 12 – Daily Vehicle Trips per Average Workers per Household 386
Suzanne Peterson, Christopher Gray, and Chris Tzeng – WRCOG November 16, 2022

Figure 13 – Daily Vehicle Trips per Median Cost per Square Foot Figure 14 – Correlation Matrix for All Variables
387
Suzanne Peterson, Christopher Gray, and Chris Tzeng – WRCOG November 16, 2022

Table 1: Residential Home Data and Sources
Value Source
Median Home Size Zillow
Average Home Rooms Zillow
Average Household Population ACS 5 year and 1 year
Average Number of Children ACS 5 year and 1 year
Average Number of Workers ACS 5 year and 1 year
TUMF Zone WRCOG
Average Household Income ACS 5 year and 1 year
Table 2: Daily Total Vehicle Trip Regression Equation Summary Home Size Variable Coefficient Constant R-Squared
All home sizes
Median Home Size (KSF) 2.26 4.22 0.507
Homes 2.5 KSF or smaller
Median Home Size (KSF) 4.11 1.22 0.553
Homes over 2.5 KSF
Median Home Size (KSF) -0.3 11.57 0.007
Notes: KSF= Thousand Square Feet
Regression Equations
All home sizes.

Daily total vehicle trips = 2.26 * Median Home Size in Thousand Square Feet + 4.22 Homes l 2.50 thousand square feet or less.

Daily total vehicle trips = 4.11 * Median Home Size in Thousand Square Feet + 1.22 Homes more than 2.50 thousand square feet.

Daily total vehicle trips = -0.3 * Median Home Size in Thousand Square Feet + 11.57 388
WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 EXHIBIT K-3
Multi-Family Residential Counts and Trip Generation Memorandum Fehr & Peers, May 12, 2023
389
3750 University Avenue | Suite 225 | Riverside, CA 92501 | (951) 274-4800 | Fax (951) 684-4324 www.fehrandpeers.com
Memorandum
Date: May 12, 2023
To: Christopher Gray - WRCOG
Chris Tzeng – WRCOG
From: Jason D. Pack, P.E.

Delia Votsch, P.E.

Raymond Poss
Subject: DRAFT TUMF Multifamily Residential Counts and Trip Generation Task Order No. 2022-65-1400-004-007
OC23-0955
This memorandum summarizes the goals, data collection and analyses, key findings, and recommendations regarding the evaluation of multifamily development characteristics and trip generation. This memo is intended to inform the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) guidelines on the relationship between multifamily trip generation, number of bedrooms per dwelling unit, and average size of dwelling unit.

Key Findings
Questions answered through the data analyses and findings are listed below.  Are the size of the dwelling unit or number of bedrooms in a dwelling unit key predictors of residential multifamily trip generation? No, the size of dwelling unit nor the number of bedrooms in a dwelling unit are key predicters of trip generation.  Are there other characteristics that have a higher predictive relationship than the number of dwelling units? No, the number of dwelling units has the highest predictive relationship.
 Are there recommended changes to the TUMF program or fee calculations based on the findings? If so, what is the potential impact to the TUMF collection process and to developers? No, it is not recommended that TUMF be updated from basing multifamily development fees on number of dwelling units. 390
Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG
May 12, 2023

Background
Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) provides local roadway funding in part through collection of fees through the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program as part of new developments. These fees vary based on the level of impact the new development will have on traffic as determined by the characteristics of the development. The impact fee for multifamily residential developments is currently determined by the number of dwelling units (DUs).

As required by new state legislature (AB-602), agencies are required to account for the size of the dwelling unit when developing impact fees. As such, Fehr & Peers was contracted to evaluate the relationship between trips generated by multifamily apartment complexes to determine if attributes other than number of dwelling units, including number bedrooms per dwelling unit and average size of dwelling unit, significantly affect trip generation.

Data Collection
This section describes the data used to evaluate multifamily trip generation, including the selection of locations and methods for collecting trip data, apartment characteristics, and regional Census data.

Study Selection Area
To evaluate the effect of dwelling unit size and number of dwelling unit bedrooms on multifamily trip generation, the following criteria were used to select the apartment complexes within Western Riverside County:
 Minimum of one complex per TUMF Zone (five zones total)  Complexes not within a Transit Priority Area (TPA)
 Complexes not near a college or university
Through discussions and review of each location with WRCOG, Fehr & Peers narrowed the study locations to 12 multifamily apartment complexes as shown on Figure 1.

Travel Activity
Trips were observed at each of the 12 complexes by collecting vehicle counts during typical weekdays at each driveway over a three-day period. Trip observations for each complex were averaged over the three-day period and summarized below in Table 1 for Daily, AM Peak Period, and PM Peak Period counts. Raw data counts taken over the three-day period can be found Appendix A.
391
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
WRCOG TUMF Multifamily Trip Generation Study Sites
!
Study Locations
TUMF Zone Boundary
Figure 1
392
Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG
May 12, 2023

Table 1: Multifamily Complex Trip Observations
Study
Site # Location Name
Daily Trips AM Peak PM Peak
Trips % In % Out Trip
Rate In % Out % Trip Rate In % Out %
1 Oakwood
Apartments 2,089 50% 50% 168 40% 60% 170 56% 44%
2 Springbrook Park
Apartments 841 50% 50% 68 34% 66% 69 58% 42%
3 Vista Springs
Apartments 1,117 49% 51% 106 36% 64% 82 55% 45%
4 Vesada
Apartment
Homes
1,625 50% 50% 126 35% 65% 126 62% 38%
5 Morning Ridge
Apartments 1,130 51% 49% 88 30% 70% 102 59% 41%
6 Stonegate
Apartments 952 56% 44% 67 42% 58% 81 64% 36%
7 River's Edge
Apartment
Homes
1,045 50% 50% 93 34% 66% 91 57% 43%
8 Mayberry Colony
Apartments 616 50% 50% 49 39% 61% 54 52% 48%
9 Summit Ridge
Apartments 777 50% 50% 67 39% 61% 57 54% 46%
10 Riverdale
Apartments 737 50% 50% 65 32% 68% 67 57% 43%
11 Parkridge
Meadows
Apartments
744 50% 50% 58 34% 66% 54 63% 37%
12 Hunt Club
Apartments 1,422 51% 49% 143 36% 64% 106 60% 40%
Source: Fehr & Peers (2023)
393
Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG
May 12, 2023

Residential Characteristics
Apartment characteristics, listed below, were obtained from a variety of sources, including conversations with apartment leasing agents, property webpages, Census data, Zillow.com, and the Assessor’s Office of Riverside County web page.
 Number of dwelling units
 Number of apartment styles (i.e., number of one-bedroom units, two-bedroom units, etc.)  Average size (square footage) of dwelling units
 Average number of bedrooms per dwelling unit
 Median monthly household income by Census Tract
 Average number of persons per household by Census Tract  Proximity to nearest public school
The average size of each dwelling unit was calculated by dividing the total size of all combined dwelling units by the total number of dwelling units. Similarly, the average number of bedrooms per dwelling unit were calculated by dividing the total number of bedrooms by the number of dwelling units. These apartment characteristics are shown below in Table 2. Specific information related to each apartment complex are provided in Appendix B. 394
Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG
May 12, 2023

Table 2: Apartment Characteristics
Study
Site # Location Name # of DUs
Average
Size of DU
(Sq. Ft.)
Average
Number of
Bedrooms
Median
Monthly
Household
Income
(Dollars)
Average #
of Persons
per
Household
Proximity
to
Nearest
School
(Mi)
1 Oakwood
Apartments 241 1,040 3.0 $65,240 3.92 0.2
2 Springbrook Park
Apartments 112 955 2.0 $77,148 3.6 0.5
3 Vista Springs
Apartments 212 822 1.5 $74,333 3.3 0.7
4 Vesada Apartment
Homes 261 938 1.7 $79,199 4.53 1.1
5 Morning Ridge
Apartments 200 850 1.6 $63,279 2.73 0.6
6 Stonegate
Apartments 160 802 1.5 $68,250 3.14 0.7
7 River's Edge
Apartment Homes 184 918 1.5 $78,222 3.74 0.4
8 Mayberry Colony
Apartments 89 896 1.6 $51,653 3.71 0.7
9 Summit Ridge
Apartments 80 529 2.5 $43,100 3.47 0.3
10 Riverdale
Apartments 96 1,015 2.6 $87,532 4.33 0.3
11 Parkridge
Meadows
Apartments
88 771 2.0 $74,886 3.53 0.1
12 Hunt Club
Apartments 203 962 2.0 $58,200 4.5 0.8
Sources: Fehr & Peers (2023), U.S. Census Bureau 5-Year American Community Survey (2016-2021), Zillow.com (2023), Riverside County Assessor (2023)
395
Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG
May 12, 2023

Trip Generation Analysis
Using the data described above, a statistical analysis, including a regression and correlation assessment, was performed to evaluate if a statistically significant relationship exists between multifamily trip generation and the following variables to determine if an update to the development fee calculation was justified.
 Number of dwelling units
 Average size of dwelling units
 Average number of bedrooms per dwelling unit
 Median monthly income
 Average number of persons per household
 Proximity to nearest public school
Correlation Analysis
A correlation analysis was also performed to determine if a one-to-one relationship exists between daily trip generation and an apartment characteristic listed above. Figure 2, below, shows the results of the correlation analysis, with darker green cells representing a stronger, positive correlation.

The correlation analysis indicates that daily trip generation has a strong, positive correlation with the number of dwelling units and a moderate, positive correlation with average size of dwelling unit. All other variables are indicated to have a weak or very weak positive correlation with trip generation.
396
Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG
May 12, 2023

Figure 2: Trip Generation Correlation Matrix

Total
Vehicles
# of
DUs
Average #
of
Bedrooms
per DU
Average
DU Size
(Sq. Ft.)
Median
Monthly
Income
Average
Household
Size
Proximity
to
Nearest
School
Total
Vehicles 1.00 0.87 0.29 0.46 0.06 0.34 0.21
# of DUs 0.87 1.00 -0.17 0.43 0.20 0.18 0.51
Average #
of
Bedrooms
per DU

0.29 -0.17 1.00 0.13 -0.09 0.36 -0.60
Average
DU Size
(Sq. Ft.)

0.46 0.43 0.13 1.00 0.55 0.51 0.16
Median
Monthly
Income

0.06 0.20 -0.09 0.55 1.00 0.25 -0.02
Average
Household
Size

0.34 0.18 0.36 0.51 0.25 1.00 0.21
Proximity
to Nearest
School

0.21 0.51 -0.60 0.16 -0.02 0.21 1.00
Source: Fehr & Peers (2023)
Regression Analysis
An ordinary least squares regression at a 95% confidence interval was performed on the above variables against daily trip generation to screen out variables that yielded statistically insignificant results. The results of the first regression are shown in Table 3. 397
Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG
May 12, 2023

Table 3: Regression Results
Variable P-Value1 Statistically Significant
Number of dwelling units <0.05 Yes
Average size (square footage) of
dwelling units
>0.05 No
Average number of bedrooms per
dwelling unit
<0.05 Yes
Median monthly household
income
>0.05 No
Average number of persons per
household
>0.05 No
Proximity to nearest public school >0.05 No
Source: Fehr & Peers (2023)

1. P-Values < 0.05 are considered statistically significant. P-Values > 0.05 are considered statistically insignificant.

A subsequent regression was run with the least statistically significant (highest P-value) variable removed. This process was repeated until all remaining variables yielded statistically significant Pvalues (less than 0.05), resulting in the number of dwelling units and average size of dwelling unit as the remaining variables. The P-Values for these variables are shown below in Table 4.

Table 4: Filtered Regression Results
Variable P-Value1 Statistically Significant
Number of dwelling units 4.8x10-07 Yes
Average size (square footage) of
dwelling units

0.0002 Yes
Source: Fehr & Peers (2023)

1. P-Values < 0.05 are considered statistically significant. P-Values > 0.05 are considered statistically insignificant.

The regression analysis indicates that number of dwelling units and average size of dwelling unit are statistically significant predictors of multifamily trip generation.

To validate these results, a forward stepwise regression was also completed. A forward stepwise regression is completed by beginning with no variables in the model, and then adding them one at a time based on which has the smallest p-value when tested one at a time. This isolates any possible relationships between the variables and further helps confirm if the vehicle trip rate has a statistically valid correlation to the variables tested. 398
Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG
May 12, 2023

Table 5: Forward Stepwise Regression Results
Variable Relationship Rank1 P-Value2 Statistically
Significant
Average size (square footage) of dwelling units 4 0.377 Yes Average number of bedrooms per dwelling unit 1 0.0008 No Median monthly household income 3 0.249 Yes
Average number of persons per household 5 0.509 Yes
Proximity to nearest public school 2 0.0239 No
Source: Fehr & Peers (2023)

1. Relationship rank indicates which variable has the strongest correlation with daily vehicle trip rate.

2. P-Values < 0.05 are considered statistically significant. P-Values > 0.05 are considered statistically insignificant.

As noted in Table 5, the variables with the strongest relationship to daily vehicle trip rate (number of bedrooms and distance to nearest school) are not statistically significant.

Trip Generation Results
In both the regression and correlation analyses, the number of dwelling units was found to be the strongest predictor of daily trip generation. All other variables had positive but weaker correlations to daily trip generation, and none were found to be statistically significant predictors of multifamily daily trip generation under both regression analyses.

Table 6: Summary of Trip Generation Results
Variable Overall Relationship
Ranking1
Statistically Significant
Filtered Regression Forward Regression
Number of Dwelling Units 1 Yes Yes
Average number of bedrooms
per dwelling unit 2 Yes No
Proximity to nearest public school 3 No No
Average size (square footage) of
dwelling units 4 No Yes
Average number of persons per
household 5 No Yes
Median monthly household
income 6 No Yes
Source: Fehr & Peers (2023)

1. Overall relationship rank indicates which variable has the strongest relationship with daily vehicle trip rate under the correlation and forward stepwise regression analyses. 399
Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG
May 12, 2023

Recommendations and Next Steps
The results of this statistical analysis indicate that the best predictor of trip generation for multifamily apartment complexes in Western Riverside County is the number of dwelling units (the current basis for development fee calculation). Although other variables showed a positive correlation with trip generation, none yielded as strong a relationship. Based on this statistical analysis, it is not recommended that these other variables be incorporated into the TUMF program.
400
Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG
May 2, 2023

Appendix A: Three-Day Trip
Observations
401
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS79 Southern Dwy east of Perris.

AM PM
TIME 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL Time 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL
0:00 10000 1 12:00 10000 1
0:15 00000 0 12:15 00000 0
0:30 10000 1 12:30 10100 2
0:45 00000 0 12:45 01000 1
1:00 10000 1 13:00 00000 0
1:15 00000 0 13:15 00000 0
1:30 10000 1 13:30 00000 0
1:45 00000 0 13:45 20000 2
2:00 00000 0 14:00 00000 0
2:15 00000 0 14:15 00000 0
2:30 00000 0 14:30 00000 0
2:45 00000 0 14:45 00000 0
3:00 00000 0 15:00 10000 1
3:15 00000 0 15:15 02000 2
3:30 10000 1 15:30 22000 4
3:45 00000 0 15:45 20000 2
4:00 00000 0 16:00 10000 1
4:15 00000 0 16:15 20000 2
4:30 00000 0 16:30 10000 1
4:45 00000 0 16:45 00000 0
5:00 00000 0 17:00 20000 2
5:15 10000 1 17:15 00000 0
5:30 00000 0 17:30 10000 1
5:45 00000 0 17:45 10000 1
6:00 10000 1 18:00 00000 0
6:15 00000 0 18:15 20000 2
6:30 00000 0 18:30 10000 1
6:45 00000 0 18:45 00000 0
7:00 10000 1 19:00 31000 4
7:15 03000 3 19:15 00000 0
7:30 00000 0 19:30 00000 0
7:45 00000 0 19:45 10000 1
8:00 00000 0 20:00 00000 0
8:15 00000 0 20:15 10000 1
8:30 00000 0 20:30 00000 0
8:45 00000 0 20:45 00000 0
9:00 00000 0 21:00 00000 0
9:15 20000 2 21:15 10000 1
9:30 21000 3 21:30 10000 1
9:45 00000 0 21:45 00000 0
10:00 11000 2 22:00 10000 1
10:15 00000 0 22:15 00000 0
10:30 00000 0 22:30 10000 1
10:45 10000 1 22:45 00000 0
11:00 10000 1 23:00 00000 0
11:15 10000 1 23:15 00000 0
11:30 00000 0 23:30 00000 0
11:45 10000 1 23:45 00000 0
TOTAL 17 5 0 0 0 22 TOTAL 29 6 1 0 0 36
AM PEAK HOUR 9:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:30 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 7 AM PEAK VOLUME 9
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 46 11 1 0 0 58
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 79.3% 19.0% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 1 3 0 0 0 4
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 5 0 0 0 0 5
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 1 - Oakwood Apartments
402
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS79 Southern Dwy east of Perris.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 10000 1 12:00 10000 1
0:15 00000 0 12:15 00000 0
0:30 10000 1 12:30 10100 2
0:45 00000 0 12:45 00000 0
1:00 10000 1 13:00 01000 1
1:15 00000 0 13:15 00000 0
1:30 10000 1 13:30 00000 0
1:45 00000 0 13:45 20000 2
2:00 00000 0 14:00 00000 0
2:15 00000 0 14:15 00000 0
2:30 00000 0 14:30 00000 0
2:45 00000 0 14:45 00000 0
3:00 00000 0 15:00 10000 1
3:15 00000 0 15:15 02000 2
3:30 00000 0 15:30 11000 2
3:45 10000 1 15:45 31000 4
4:00 00000 0 16:00 10000 1
4:15 00000 0 16:15 30000 3
4:30 00000 0 16:30 10000 1
4:45 00000 0 16:45 00000 0
5:00 10000 1 17:00 20000 2
5:15 10000 1 17:15 00000 0
5:30 00000 0 17:30 10000 1
5:45 00000 0 17:45 10000 1
6:00 10000 1 18:00 10000 1
6:15 00000 0 18:15 10000 1
6:30 00000 0 18:30 30000 3
6:45 00000 0 18:45 00000 0
7:00 10000 1 19:00 21000 3
7:15 03000 3 19:15 10000 1
7:30 00000 0 19:30 00000 0
7:45 00000 0 19:45 10000 1
8:00 00000 0 20:00 00000 0
8:15 00000 0 20:15 10000 1
8:30 00000 0 20:30 00000 0
8:45 00000 0 20:45 00000 0
9:00 00000 0 21:00 00000 0
9:15 20000 2 21:15 10000 1
9:30 21000 3 21:30 00000 0
9:45 00000 0 21:45 10000 1
10:00 11000 2 22:00 10000 1
10:15 00000 0 22:15 00000 0
10:30 00000 0 22:30 10000 1
10:45 20000 2 22:45 00000 0
11:00 10000 1 23:00 00000 0
11:15 00000 0 23:15 00000 0
11:30 10000 1 23:30 00000 0
11:45 10000 1 23:45 00000 0
TOTAL 19 5 0 0 0 24 TOTAL 32 6 1 0 0 39
AM PEAK HOUR 9:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:30 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 7 AM PEAK VOLUME 10
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 51 11 1 0 0 63
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 81.0% 17.5% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 1 3 0 0 0 4
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 6 0 0 0 0 6
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 1 - Oakwood Apartments
403
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS80 Northern Dwy east of Perris.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 90000 9 12:00 35 0 0 0 0 35
0:15 60000 6 12:15 42 1 0 0 0 43
0:30 20 0 0 0 0 20 12:30 36 1 1 0 0 38
0:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 12:45 58 0 0 0 0 58
1:00 16 0 0 0 0 16 13:00 44 0 0 0 0 44
1:15 50000 5 13:15 39 1 0 0 0 40
1:30 50000 5 13:30 38 0 0 0 0 38
1:45 70000 7 13:45 55 0 0 0 0 55
2:00 70000 7 14:00 44 0 0 0 0 44
2:15 20000 2 14:15 65 0 0 0 0 65
2:30 20000 2 14:30 51 0 0 0 0 51
2:45 40000 4 14:45 63 0 0 0 0 63
3:00 10000 1 15:00 53 0 0 0 0 53
3:15 20000 2 15:15 64 2 0 0 0 66
3:30 50000 5 15:30 66 2000 68
3:45 00000 0 15:45 75 1 0 0 0 76
4:00 60000 6 16:00 73 0 0 0 0 73
4:15 90000 9 16:15 67 0 0 0 0 67
4:30 10000 1 16:30 62 0 0 0 0 62
4:45 20000 2 16:45 80 0 0 0 0 80
5:00 80000 8 17:00 48 2 0 0 0 50
5:15 70000 7 17:15 68 0 0 0 0 68
5:30 50000 5 17:30 53 0 0 0 0 53
5:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 17:45 60 0 0 0 0 60
6:00 90000 9 18:00 79 0 0 0 0 79
6:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 18:15 70 0 0 0 0 70
6:30 80000 8 18:30 60 0 0 0 0 60
6:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 18:45 54 0 0 0 0 54
7:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 19:00 53 0 0 0 0 53
7:15 29 0 0 0 0 29 19:15 43 0 0 0 0 43
7:30 48 0 0 0 0 48 19:30 38 0 0 0 0 38
7:45 70 0 0 0 0 70 19:45 35 0000 35
8:00 52 0 0 0 0 52 20:00 48 0 0 0 0 48
8:15 27 0 0 0 0 27 20:15 38 0 0 0 0 38
8:30 52 0 0 0 0 52 20:30 38 0 0 0 0 38
8:45 36 0 1 0 0 37 20:45 32 0 0 0 0 32
9:00 21 1 0 0 0 22 21:00 47 0 0 0 0 47
9:15 19 1 0 0 0 20 21:15 36 0 0 0 0 36
9:30 22 0 0 0 0 22 21:30 35 0 0 0 0 35
9:45 29 1 0 0 0 30 21:45 25 0 0 0 0 25
10:00 28 1 0 0 0 29 22:00 35 0 0 0 0 35
10:15 24 0 0 0 0 24 22:15 24 0 0 0 0 24
10:30 24 0 0 0 0 24 22:30 23 0 0 0 0 23
10:45 35 0 0 0 0 35 22:45 21 0 0 0 0 21
11:00 31 0 0 0 0 31 23:00 16 0 0 0 0 16
11:15 16 0 0 0 0 16 23:15 30 0 0 0 0 30
11:30 20 0 0 0 0 20 23:30 10 0 0 0 0 10
11:45 29 3 0 0 0 32 23:45 17 0 0 0 0 17
TOTAL 815 7 1 0 0 823 TOTAL 2,246 10 1 0 0 2,257
AM PEAK HOUR 7:45 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:30 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 201 AM PEAK VOLUME 284
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 3,061 17 2 0 0 3,080
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 99.4% 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 201 0 0 0 0 201
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 282 0 0 0 0 282
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 1 - Oakwood Apartments
404
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS80 Northern Dwy east of Perris.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 51000 6 12:00 59 1 0 0 0 60
0:15 80000 8 12:15 38 2 0 0 0 40
0:30 70000 7 12:30 34 0 0 0 0 34
0:45 70000 7 12:45 32 1 0 0 0 33
1:00 51000 6 13:00 40 0 0 0 0 40
1:15 60000 6 13:15 47 0 1 0 0 48
1:30 30000 3 13:30 51 1 0 0 0 52
1:45 50000 5 13:45 46 0 0 0 0 46
2:00 30000 3 14:00 60 0 0 0 0 60
2:15 20000 2 14:15 49 0 0 0 0 49
2:30 10000 1 14:30 52 0 0 0 0 52
2:45 30000 3 14:45 48 0 0 0 0 48
3:00 20000 2 15:00 57 0 0 0 0 57
3:15 40000 4 15:15 56 0 0 0 0 56
3:30 50000 5 15:30 61 1000 62
3:45 10 0 0 0 0 10 15:45 37 0 0 0 0 37
4:00 14 0 0 0 0 14 16:00 71 0 0 0 0 71
4:15 17 0 0 0 0 17 16:15 39 0 0 0 0 39
4:30 20 0 0 0 0 20 16:30 53 1 0 0 0 54
4:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 16:45 53 0 0 0 0 53
5:00 15 0 0 0 0 15 17:00 63 0 0 0 0 63
5:15 19 0 0 0 0 19 17:15 46 1 0 0 0 47
5:30 21 0 0 0 0 21 17:30 48 0 0 0 0 48
5:45 23 0 0 0 0 23 17:45 42 0 0 0 0 42
6:00 28 0 0 0 0 28 18:00 48 0 0 0 0 48
6:15 29 0 0 0 0 29 18:15 57 0 0 0 0 57
6:30 27 0 0 0 0 27 18:30 30 0 0 0 0 30
6:45 38 0 0 0 0 38 18:45 33 0 0 0 0 33
7:00 48 0 0 0 0 48 19:00 41 0 0 0 0 41
7:15 79 0 0 0 0 79 19:15 20 0 0 0 0 20
7:30 82 0 0 0 0 82 19:30 32 1 0 0 0 33
7:45 78 0 0 0 0 78 19:45 33 0000 33
8:00 57 0 0 0 0 57 20:00 33 0 0 0 0 33
8:15 61 0 0 0 0 61 20:15 31 0 0 0 0 31
8:30 36 1 0 0 0 37 20:30 32 1 0 0 0 33
8:45 34 0 0 0 0 34 20:45 35 0 0 0 0 35
9:00 27 0 0 0 0 27 21:00 29 0 0 0 0 29
9:15 33 0 0 0 0 33 21:15 24 0 0 0 0 24
9:30 27 2 1 0 0 30 21:30 28 0 0 0 0 28
9:45 44 1 0 0 0 45 21:45 24 0 0 0 0 24
10:00 28 1 0 0 0 29 22:00 19 0 0 0 0 19
10:15 39 1 0 0 0 40 22:15 14 0 0 0 0 14
10:30 27 2 0 0 0 29 22:30 16 0 0 0 0 16
10:45 32 0 0 0 0 32 22:45 16 0 0 0 0 16
11:00 36 0 0 0 0 36 23:00 16 0 0 0 0 16
11:15 37 0 0 0 0 37 23:15 19 0 0 0 0 19
11:30 26 0 0 0 0 26 23:30 80000 8
11:45 39 1 0 0 0 40 23:45 13 0 0 0 0 13
TOTAL 1,208 11 1 0 0 1,220 TOTAL 1,833 10 1 0 0 1,844
AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:15 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 296 AM PEAK VOLUME 226
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 3,041 21 2 0 0 3,064
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 99.2% 0.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 296 0 0 0 0 296
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 216 1 0 0 0 217
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 1 - Oakwood Apartments
405
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS75 Eastern Dwy south of Orange.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 20000 2 12:00 60000 6
0:15 10000 1 12:15 60000 6
0:30 10000 1 12:30 40000 4
0:45 20000 2 12:45 71000 8
1:00 10000 1 13:00 70000 7
1:15 10000 1 13:15 70000 7
1:30 10000 1 13:30 80000 8
1:45 10000 1 13:45 10 0 0 0 0 10
2:00 00000 0 14:00 80000 8
2:15 30000 3 14:15 61000 7
2:30 00000 0 14:30 17 1 0 0 0 18
2:45 00000 0 14:45 80000 8
3:00 00000 0 15:00 11 0 0 0 0 11
3:15 10000 1 15:15 50000 5
3:30 10000 1 15:30 16 0000 16
3:45 30000 3 15:45 22 0 0 0 0 22
4:00 00000 0 16:00 10 0 0 0 0 10
4:15 10000 1 16:15 92000 11
4:30 30000 3 16:30 14 0 0 0 0 14
4:45 20000 2 16:45 11 0 0 0 0 11
5:00 10000 1 17:00 10 0 0 0 0 10
5:15 00000 0 17:15 12 0 0 0 0 12
5:30 20000 2 17:30 17 0 0 0 0 17
5:45 30000 3 17:45 11 0 0 0 0 11
6:00 40000 4 18:00 50000 5
6:15 13000 4 18:15 70000 7
6:30 00000 0 18:30 15 0 0 0 0 15
6:45 21000 3 18:45 13 0 0 0 0 13
7:00 42000 6 19:00 80000 8
7:15 43000 7 19:15 90000 9
7:30 40000 4 19:30 90000 9
7:45 50000 5 19:45 80000 8
8:00 50000 5 20:00 60000 6
8:15 11 0000 11 20:15 10 0 0 0 0 10
8:30 70000 7 20:30 40000 4
8:45 60000 6 20:45 70000 7
9:00 40000 4 21:00 40000 4
9:15 40000 4 21:15 20000 2
9:30 10000 1 21:30 60000 6
9:45 21000 3 21:45 80000 8
10:00 10000 1 22:00 30000 3
10:15 61000 7 22:15 50000 5
10:30 80000 8 22:30 50000 5
10:45 10000 1 22:45 30000 3
11:00 41000 5 23:00 10000 1
11:15 20100 3 23:15 50000 5
11:30 20000 2 23:30 00000 0
11:45 10 1 1 0 0 12 23:45 00000 0
TOTAL 128 13 2 0 0 143 TOTAL 385 5 0 0 0 390
AM PEAK HOUR 8:00 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:30 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 29 AM PEAK VOLUME 59
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 513 18 2 0 0 533
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 96.2% 3.4% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 29 0 0 0 0 29
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 50 0 0 0 0 50
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 2 - Springbrook Park Apartments
406
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS75 Eastern Dwy south of Orange.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 10000 1 12:00 81000 9
0:15 00000 0 12:15 60000 6
0:30 00000 0 12:30 62100 9
0:45 20000 2 12:45 40000 4
1:00 00000 0 13:00 50000 5
1:15 00000 0 13:15 60000 6
1:30 00000 0 13:30 30000 3
1:45 00000 0 13:45 80000 8
2:00 00000 0 14:00 12 0 0 0 0 12
2:15 30000 3 14:15 90000 9
2:30 20000 2 14:30 90000 9
2:45 50000 5 14:45 80000 8
3:00 00000 0 15:00 60000 6
3:15 40000 4 15:15 70000 7
3:30 60000 6 15:30 90000 9
3:45 10000 1 15:45 30000 3
4:00 30000 3 16:00 15 0000 15
4:15 10000 1 16:15 11 0 0 0 0 11
4:30 50000 5 16:30 15 0 0 0 0 15
4:45 70000 7 16:45 90000 9
5:00 40000 4 17:00 50000 5
5:15 70000 7 17:15 11 0 0 0 0 11
5:30 30000 3 17:30 60000 6
5:45 60000 6 17:45 10 0 0 0 0 10
6:00 50000 5 18:00 50000 5
6:15 90000 9 18:15 90000 9
6:30 60000 6 18:30 50000 5
6:45 70000 7 18:45 60000 6
7:00 50000 5 19:00 10 0 0 0 0 10
7:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 19:15 10 0 0 0 0 10
7:30 19 0 1 0 0 20 19:30 50000 5
7:45 19 0 0 0 0 19 19:45 50000 5
8:00 70000 7 20:00 50000 5
8:15 90000 9 20:15 20000 2
8:30 40100 5 20:30 50000 5
8:45 90000 9 20:45 30000 3
9:00 30000 3 21:00 50000 5
9:15 60000 6 21:15 20000 2
9:30 40000 4 21:30 90000 9
9:45 10000 1 21:45 50000 5
10:00 50000 5 22:00 10000 1
10:15 80000 8 22:15 30000 3
10:30 40000 4 22:30 50000 5
10:45 30000 3 22:45 60000 6
11:00 11 1000 12 23:00 30000 3
11:15 60000 6 23:15 00000 0
11:30 41000 5 23:30 40000 4
11:45 80000 8 23:45 20000 2
TOTAL 234 2 2 0 0 238 TOTAL 306 3 1 0 0 310
AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 4:00 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 58 AM PEAK VOLUME 50
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 540 5 3 0 0 548
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 98.5% 0.9% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 57 0 1 0 0 58
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 50 0 0 0 0 50
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 2 - Springbrook Park Apartments
407
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS76 Western Dwy south of Orange.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 20000 2 12:00 71000 8
0:15 30000 3 12:15 11 0 0 0 0 11
0:30 10000 1 12:30 12 2 1 0 0 15
0:45 30000 3 12:45 60000 6
1:00 00000 0 13:00 13 0 0 0 0 13
1:15 10000 1 13:15 11 1 0 0 0 12
1:30 00000 0 13:30 10 0 0 0 0 10
1:45 10000 1 13:45 90000 9
2:00 10000 1 14:00 13 0 0 0 0 13
2:15 00000 0 14:15 10 0 0 0 0 10
2:30 00000 0 14:30 13 0 0 0 0 13
2:45 40000 4 14:45 10 0 0 0 0 10
3:00 00000 0 15:00 12 0 0 0 0 12
3:15 10000 1 15:15 13 0 0 0 0 13
3:30 00000 0 15:30 16 0000 16
3:45 00000 0 15:45 15 0 0 0 0 15
4:00 00000 0 16:00 13 1 0 0 0 14
4:15 00000 0 16:15 14 0 0 0 0 14
4:30 20000 2 16:30 13 0 0 0 0 13
4:45 10000 1 16:45 14 0 0 0 0 14
5:00 10000 1 17:00 16 0 0 0 0 16
5:15 50000 5 17:15 13 0 0 0 0 13
5:30 40000 4 17:30 24 0 0 0 0 24
5:45 20000 2 17:45 17 0 0 0 0 17
6:00 50000 5 18:00 20 0 0 0 0 20
6:15 50000 5 18:15 15 0 0 0 0 15
6:30 20000 2 18:30 10 0 0 0 0 10
6:45 10000 1 18:45 90000 9
7:00 20000 2 19:00 18 0 0 0 0 18
7:15 20100 3 19:15 13 0 0 0 0 13
7:30 70000 7 19:30 80000 8
7:45 15 0 0 0 0 15 19:45 70000 7
8:00 90000 9 20:00 11 0000 11
8:15 60100 7 20:15 11 0 0 0 0 11
8:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 20:30 70000 7
8:45 80000 8 20:45 90000 9
9:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 21:00 14 0 0 0 0 14
9:15 70000 7 21:15 11 0 0 0 0 11
9:30 31000 4 21:30 70000 7
9:45 30000 3 21:45 15 0 0 0 0 15
10:00 10 1 0 0 0 11 22:00 50000 5
10:15 30000 3 22:15 70000 7
10:30 80000 8 22:30 40000 4
10:45 70000 7 22:45 50000 5
11:00 30000 3 23:00 40000 4
11:15 70000 7 23:15 30000 3
11:30 21000 3 23:30 70000 7
11:45 70000 7 23:45 60000 6
TOTAL 174 3 2 0 0 179 TOTAL 531 5 1 0 0 537
AM PEAK HOUR 7:45 AM AM PEAK HOUR 5:30 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 41 AM PEAK VOLUME 76
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 705 8 3 0 0 716
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 98.5% 1.1% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 40 0 1 0 0 41
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 70 0 0 0 0 70
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 2 - Springbrook Park Apartments
408
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS76 Western Dwy south of Orange.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 00000 0 12:00 60100 7
0:15 10000 1 12:15 90000 9
0:30 00000 0 12:30 90000 9
0:45 10000 1 12:45 40000 4
1:00 00000 0 13:00 61000 7
1:15 00000 0 13:15 11 1 0 0 0 12
1:30 10000 1 13:30 20 0 0 0 0 20
1:45 00000 0 13:45 11 0 0 0 0 11
2:00 10000 1 14:00 13 0 0 0 0 13
2:15 10000 1 14:15 11 0 0 0 0 11
2:30 00000 0 14:30 11 2 0 0 0 13
2:45 00000 0 14:45 90000 9
3:00 00000 0 15:00 21 0 0 0 0 21
3:15 10000 1 15:15 11 0 0 0 0 11
3:30 60000 6 15:30 90000 9
3:45 90000 9 15:45 90000 9
4:00 40000 4 16:00 91000 10
4:15 80000 8 16:15 81000 9
4:30 50000 5 16:30 81000 9
4:45 60000 6 16:45 10 0000 10
5:00 50000 5 17:00 30000 3
5:15 60000 6 17:15 90000 9
5:30 60000 6 17:30 11 0 0 0 0 11
5:45 60000 6 17:45 11 0 0 0 0 11
6:00 70000 7 18:00 15 0 0 0 0 15
6:15 53000 8 18:15 10 0 0 0 0 10
6:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 18:30 90000 9
6:45 20000 2 18:45 90000 9
7:00 73000 10 19:00 40000 4
7:15 17 3 0 0 0 20 19:15 90000 9
7:30 18 0 0 0 0 18 19:30 10 0 0 0 0 10
7:45 24 0 0 0 0 24 19:45 40000 4
8:00 16 0000 16 20:00 70000 7
8:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 20:15 40000 4
8:30 17 0 0 0 0 17 20:30 11 0 0 0 0 11
8:45 14 0 0 0 0 14 20:45 50000 5
9:00 80000 8 21:00 60000 6
9:15 90000 9 21:15 70000 7
9:30 10 1 0 0 0 11 21:30 30000 3
9:45 11000 2 21:45 40000 4
10:00 13 0 0 0 0 13 22:00 11 0 0 0 0 11
10:15 12 2 0 0 0 14 22:15 20000 2
10:30 90000 9 22:30 50000 5
10:45 60000 6 22:45 00000 0
11:00 11 0 0 0 0 11 23:00 30000 3
11:15 30000 3 23:15 30000 3
11:30 50100 6 23:30 30000 3
11:45 81000 9 23:45 10000 1
TOTAL 314 14 1 0 0 329 TOTAL 384 7 1 0 0 392
AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 1:15 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 78 AM PEAK VOLUME 56
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 698 21 2 0 0 721
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 96.8% 2.9% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 75 3 0 0 0 78
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 35 3 0 0 0 38
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 2 - Springbrook Park Apartments
409
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS77 Dwy east of Clark
AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 40000 4 12:00 13 0 0 0 0 13
0:15 30000 3 12:15 30000 3
0:30 10000 1 12:30 80000 8
0:45 50000 5 12:45 11 0 0 0 0 11
1:00 30000 3 13:00 80000 8
1:15 10000 1 13:15 12 0 0 0 0 12
1:30 00000 0 13:30 12 0 0 0 0 12
1:45 10000 1 13:45 60000 6
2:00 00000 0 14:00 12 0 1 0 0 13
2:15 10000 1 14:15 14 0 0 0 0 14
2:30 00000 0 14:30 11 0 0 0 0 11
2:45 10000 1 14:45 40000 4
3:00 00000 0 15:00 60000 6
3:15 00000 0 15:15 11 0 0 0 0 11
3:30 00000 0 15:30 11 0000 11
3:45 10000 1 15:45 10 0 0 0 0 10
4:00 00000 0 16:00 50000 5
4:15 20000 2 16:15 16 0 0 0 0 16
4:30 20000 2 16:30 10 0 0 0 0 10
4:45 40000 4 16:45 13 0 0 0 0 13
5:00 40000 4 17:00 14 0 0 0 0 14
5:15 20000 2 17:15 16 0 0 0 0 16
5:30 10000 1 17:30 10 0 0 0 0 10
5:45 10000 1 17:45 12 0 0 0 0 12
6:00 00000 0 18:00 80000 8
6:15 10000 1 18:15 10 0 0 0 0 10
6:30 00000 0 18:30 16 0 0 0 0 16
6:45 10000 1 18:45 90000 9
7:00 20000 2 19:00 80000 8
7:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 19:15 17 0 0 0 0 17
7:30 18 0 0 0 0 18 19:30 13 0 0 0 0 13
7:45 16 0 0 0 0 16 19:45 40000 4
8:00 10 0000 10 20:00 16 0 0 0 0 16
8:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 20:15 50000 5
8:30 60000 6 20:30 13 0 0 0 0 13
8:45 70000 7 20:45 11 0 0 0 0 11
9:00 50000 5 21:00 90000 9
9:15 60000 6 21:15 11 0 0 0 0 11
9:30 50000 5 21:30 50000 5
9:45 40000 4 21:45 80000 8
10:00 60000 6 22:00 80000 8
10:15 41000 5 22:15 20000 2
10:30 31000 4 22:30 10000 1
10:45 10000 1 22:45 60000 6
11:00 20000 2 23:00 40000 4
11:15 30000 3 23:15 20000 2
11:30 40000 4 23:30 00000 0
11:45 80000 8 23:45 40000 4
TOTAL 169 2 0 0 0 171 TOTAL 438 0 1 0 0 439
AM PEAK HOUR 7:30 AM AM PEAK HOUR 4:45 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 54 AM PEAK VOLUME 53
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 607 2 1 0 0 610
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 99.5% 0.3% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 54 0 0 0 0 54
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 53 0 0 0 0 53
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 3 - Vista Springs Apartments
410
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS77 Dwy east of Clark
AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 10000 1 12:00 10 0 0 0 0 10
0:15 20000 2 12:15 13 0 0 0 0 13
0:30 10000 1 12:30 10 0 0 0 0 10
0:45 20000 2 12:45 10 1 0 0 0 11
1:00 10000 1 13:00 11 0 0 0 0 11
1:15 10000 1 13:15 10 0 0 0 0 10
1:30 30000 3 13:30 16 0 1 0 0 17
1:45 00000 0 13:45 19 0 0 0 0 19
2:00 00000 0 14:00 18 0 0 0 0 18
2:15 00000 0 14:15 19 0 0 0 0 19
2:30 10000 1 14:30 10 0 0 0 0 10
2:45 00000 0 14:45 16 0 0 0 0 16
3:00 10000 1 15:00 12 0 0 0 0 12
3:15 30000 3 15:15 13 0 0 0 0 13
3:30 60000 6 15:30 13 0000 13
3:45 10000 1 15:45 90000 9
4:00 50000 5 16:00 80000 8
4:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 16:15 11 0 0 0 0 11
4:30 40000 4 16:30 10 0 0 0 0 10
4:45 20000 2 16:45 80000 8
5:00 50000 5 17:00 13 0 0 0 0 13
5:15 80000 8 17:15 11 0 0 0 0 11
5:30 40000 4 17:30 80000 8
5:45 40000 4 17:45 40000 4
6:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 18:00 60000 6
6:15 80000 8 18:15 70000 7
6:30 14 0 0 0 0 14 18:30 15 0 0 0 0 15
6:45 80000 8 18:45 19 1 0 0 0 20
7:00 23 0 0 0 0 23 19:00 70000 7
7:15 26 0 0 0 0 26 19:15 40000 4
7:30 27 0 0 0 0 27 19:30 70000 7
7:45 31 0 0 0 0 31 19:45 50000 5
8:00 31 0000 31 20:00 60000 6
8:15 21 0 0 0 0 21 20:15 30000 3
8:30 15 0 0 0 0 15 20:30 20000 2
8:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 20:45 90000 9
9:00 90000 9 21:00 50000 5
9:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 21:15 70000 7
9:30 80000 8 21:30 90000 9
9:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 21:45 70000 7
10:00 13 1 0 0 0 14 22:00 60000 6
10:15 41000 5 22:15 40000 4
10:30 80000 8 22:30 50000 5
10:45 61000 7 22:45 00000 0
11:00 80000 8 23:00 10000 1
11:15 61000 7 23:15 20000 2
11:30 90000 9 23:30 00000 0
11:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 23:45 00000 0
TOTAL 398 4 0 0 0 402 TOTAL 418 2 1 0 0 421
AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 1:30 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 115 AM PEAK VOLUME 73
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 816 6 1 0 0 823
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 99.1% 0.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 115 0 0 0 0 115
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 42 0 0 0 0 42
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 3 - Vista Springs Apartments
411
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS78 Dwy north of Box Springs AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 80000 8 12:00 90000 9
0:15 50000 5 12:15 15 0 0 0 0 15
0:30 10000 1 12:30 17 1 1 0 0 19
0:45 30000 3 12:45 12 1 0 0 0 13
1:00 10000 1 13:00 14 0 0 0 0 14
1:15 50000 5 13:15 16 0 1 0 0 17
1:30 20000 2 13:30 91000 10
1:45 40000 4 13:45 80000 8
2:00 30000 3 14:00 20 0 0 0 0 20
2:15 30000 3 14:15 22 0 0 0 0 22
2:30 20000 2 14:30 20 0 0 0 0 20
2:45 00000 0 14:45 11 0 0 0 0 11
3:00 00000 0 15:00 15 0 0 0 0 15
3:15 10000 1 15:15 29 0 0 0 0 29
3:30 00000 0 15:30 27 0000 27
3:45 00000 0 15:45 13 0 0 0 0 13
4:00 30000 3 16:00 19 0 0 0 0 19
4:15 20000 2 16:15 21 0 0 0 0 21
4:30 10000 1 16:30 26 0 0 0 0 26
4:45 20000 2 16:45 13 0 0 0 0 13
5:00 20000 2 17:00 23 0 0 0 0 23
5:15 20000 2 17:15 21 0 0 0 0 21
5:30 10000 1 17:30 13 0 0 0 0 13
5:45 30000 3 17:45 17 0 0 0 0 17
6:00 30000 3 18:00 19 0 0 0 0 19
6:15 00000 0 18:15 20 0 0 0 0 20
6:30 60000 6 18:30 16 0 0 0 0 16
6:45 60000 6 18:45 13 1 0 0 0 14
7:00 70000 7 19:00 23 0 0 0 0 23
7:15 50000 5 19:15 16 0 0 0 0 16
7:30 60000 6 19:30 19 0 0 0 0 19
7:45 14 0 0 0 0 14 19:45 34 0000 34
8:00 16 0 0 0 0 16 20:00 15 0 0 0 0 15
8:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 20:15 20 0 0 0 0 20
8:30 20 0 0 0 0 20 20:30 17 0 0 0 0 17
8:45 14 0 0 0 0 14 20:45 21 0 0 0 0 21
9:00 80000 8 21:00 16 0 0 0 0 16
9:15 50000 5 21:15 13 0 0 0 0 13
9:30 80000 8 21:30 70000 7
9:45 12 1 0 0 0 13 21:45 70000 7
10:00 12 0 0 0 0 12 22:00 11 0 0 0 0 11
10:15 10 2 0 0 0 12 22:15 30000 3
10:30 10 2 0 0 0 12 22:30 12 0 0 0 0 12
10:45 80000 8 22:45 50000 5
11:00 13 0 0 0 0 13 23:00 70000 7
11:15 13 1 0 0 0 14 23:15 60000 6
11:30 13 1 0 0 0 14 23:30 80000 8
11:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 23:45 10 0 0 0 0 10
TOTAL 285 7 0 0 0 292 TOTAL 748 4 2 0 0 754
AM PEAK HOUR 8:00 AM AM PEAK HOUR 7:00 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 60 AM PEAK VOLUME 92
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 1,033 11 2 0 0 1,046
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 98.8% 1.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 60 0 0 0 0 60
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 83 0 0 0 0 83
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 3 - Vista Springs Apartments
412
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS78 Dwy north of Box Springs AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 70000 7 12:00 14 0 0 0 0 14
0:15 80000 8 12:15 18 0 0 0 0 18
0:30 10000 1 12:30 90000 9
0:45 00000 0 12:45 17 0 0 0 0 17
1:00 00000 0 13:00 14 1 0 0 0 15
1:15 20000 2 13:15 80000 8
1:30 40000 4 13:30 81100 10
1:45 00000 0 13:45 13 0 0 0 0 13
2:00 60000 6 14:00 12 0 0 0 0 12
2:15 10000 1 14:15 90000 9
2:30 10000 1 14:30 11 0 1 0 0 12
2:45 20000 2 14:45 20 0 0 0 0 20
3:00 00000 0 15:00 60000 6
3:15 10000 1 15:15 20 0 0 0 0 20
3:30 10000 1 15:30 90000 9
3:45 00000 0 15:45 13 0000 13
4:00 40000 4 16:00 16 0 0 0 0 16
4:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 16:15 18 0 0 0 0 18
4:30 14 0 0 0 0 14 16:30 16 0 0 0 0 16
4:45 30000 3 16:45 19 0 0 0 0 19
5:00 40000 4 17:00 14 0 0 0 0 14
5:15 50000 5 17:15 16 0 0 0 0 16
5:30 50000 5 17:30 18 0 0 0 0 18
5:45 14 0 0 0 0 14 17:45 12 0 0 0 0 12
6:00 80000 8 18:00 50000 5
6:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 18:15 90000 9
6:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 18:30 18 0 0 0 0 18
6:45 90000 9 18:45 90000 9
7:00 29 0 0 0 0 29 19:00 60000 6
7:15 17 0 0 0 0 17 19:15 16 0 0 0 0 16
7:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 19:30 20000 2
7:45 30 0 0 0 0 30 19:45 90000 9
8:00 16 0000 16 20:00 40000 4
8:15 90000 9 20:15 10 0 0 0 0 10
8:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 20:30 10 0 0 0 0 10
8:45 15 0 0 0 0 15 20:45 40000 4
9:00 70000 7 21:00 80000 8
9:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 21:15 70000 7
9:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 21:30 30000 3
9:45 14 0 0 0 0 14 21:45 20000 2
10:00 17 0 0 0 0 17 22:00 20000 2
10:15 90000 9 22:15 10000 1
10:30 14 2 0 0 0 16 22:30 30000 3
10:45 81000 9 22:45 40000 4
11:00 70000 7 23:00 10000 1
11:15 80000 8 23:15 20000 2
11:30 90000 9 23:30 00000 0
11:45 10 1 0 0 0 11 23:45 10000 1
TOTAL 398 4 0 0 0 402 TOTAL 466 2 2 0 0 470
AM PEAK HOUR 7:00 AM AM PEAK HOUR 4:00 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 88 AM PEAK VOLUME 69
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 864 6 2 0 0 872
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 99.1% 0.7% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 88 0 0 0 0 88
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 69 0 0 0 0 69
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 3 - Vista Springs Apartments
413
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS73 Southern Dwy east of Country Village.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 00000 0 12:00 00000 0
0:15 00000 0 12:15 00000 0
0:30 00000 0 12:30 00000 0
0:45 00000 0 12:45 00000 0
1:00 00000 0 13:00 00000 0
1:15 00000 0 13:15 00000 0
1:30 00000 0 13:30 00000 0
1:45 00000 0 13:45 00000 0
2:00 00000 0 14:00 00000 0
2:15 00000 0 14:15 00000 0
2:30 00000 0 14:30 00000 0
2:45 00000 0 14:45 00000 0
3:00 00000 0 15:00 00000 0
3:15 00000 0 15:15 00000 0
3:30 00000 0 15:30 00000 0
3:45 00000 0 15:45 00000 0
4:00 00000 0 16:00 00000 0
4:15 00000 0 16:15 00000 0
4:30 00000 0 16:30 00000 0
4:45 00000 0 16:45 00000 0
5:00 00000 0 17:00 00000 0
5:15 00000 0 17:15 00000 0
5:30 00000 0 17:30 00000 0
5:45 00000 0 17:45 00000 0
6:00 00000 0 18:00 00000 0
6:15 00000 0 18:15 00000 0
6:30 00000 0 18:30 00000 0
6:45 00000 0 18:45 00000 0
7:00 00000 0 19:00 00000 0
7:15 00000 0 19:15 00000 0
7:30 00000 0 19:30 00000 0
7:45 00000 0 19:45 00000 0
8:00 00000 0 20:00 00000 0
8:15 00000 0 20:15 00000 0
8:30 00000 0 20:30 00000 0
8:45 00000 0 20:45 00000 0
9:00 00000 0 21:00 00000 0
9:15 00000 0 21:15 00000 0
9:30 00000 0 21:30 00000 0
9:45 00000 0 21:45 00000 0
10:00 00000 0 22:00 00000 0
10:15 00000 0 22:15 00000 0
10:30 00000 0 22:30 00000 0
10:45 00000 0 22:45 00000 0
11:00 00000 0 23:00 00000 0
11:15 00000 0 23:15 00000 0
11:30 00000 0 23:30 00000 0
11:45 00000 0 23:45 00000 0
TOTAL 000000 TOTAL 000000
AM PEAK HOUR 11:45 AM AM PEAK HOUR 11:45 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 0 AM PEAK VOLUME 0
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 000000
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 0 0 0 0 0 0
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 0 0 0 0 0 0
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 4 - Vesada Aparment Homes
414
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS73 Southern Dwy east of Country Village.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 10000 1 12:00 10000 1
0:15 00000 0 12:15 30000 3
0:30 10000 1 12:30 20000 2
0:45 10000 1 12:45 30000 3
1:00 00000 0 13:00 00000 0
1:15 10000 1 13:15 00000 0
1:30 00000 0 13:30 60000 6
1:45 00000 0 13:45 00000 0
2:00 00000 0 14:00 20000 2
2:15 00000 0 14:15 50000 5
2:30 00000 0 14:30 41000 5
2:45 00000 0 14:45 10000 1
3:00 00000 0 15:00 20000 2
3:15 40000 4 15:15 10000 1
3:30 50000 5 15:30 10000 1
3:45 10000 1 15:45 00000 0
4:00 30000 3 16:00 10000 1
4:15 00000 0 16:15 50000 5
4:30 10000 1 16:30 10000 1
4:45 20000 2 16:45 00000 0
5:00 00000 0 17:00 10000 1
5:15 30000 3 17:15 20000 2
5:30 10000 1 17:30 00000 0
5:45 20000 2 17:45 20000 2
6:00 30000 3 18:00 10000 1
6:15 10000 1 18:15 10000 1
6:30 30000 3 18:30 10000 1
6:45 10000 1 18:45 10000 1
7:00 30000 3 19:00 30000 3
7:15 10000 1 19:15 00000 0
7:30 20000 2 19:30 30000 3
7:45 30000 3 19:45 10000 1
8:00 30000 3 20:00 10000 1
8:15 10000 1 20:15 00000 0
8:30 00000 0 20:30 20000 2
8:45 00000 0 20:45 20000 2
9:00 20000 2 21:00 20000 2
9:15 30000 3 21:15 30000 3
9:30 10000 1 21:30 40000 4
9:45 40000 4 21:45 00000 0
10:00 30000 3 22:00 30000 3
10:15 00000 0 22:15 20000 2
10:30 20000 2 22:30 20000 2
10:45 10000 1 22:45 10000 1
11:00 20000 2 23:00 10000 1
11:15 10000 1 23:15 10000 1
11:30 00000 0 23:30 00000 0
11:45 30000 3 23:45 00000 0
TOTAL 69 0 0 0 0 69 TOTAL 78 1 0 0 0 79
AM PEAK HOUR 3:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 2:15 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 13 AM PEAK VOLUME 13
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 147 1 0 0 0 148
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 99.3% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 9 0 0 0 0 9
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 7 0 0 0 0 7
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 4 - Vesada Aparment Homes
415
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS74 Northern Dwy east of Country Village.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 50000 5 12:00 33 0 0 0 0 33
0:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 12:15 33 1 0 0 0 34
0:30 50000 5 12:30 36 1 0 0 0 37
0:45 40000 4 12:45 37 0 1 0 0 38
1:00 70000 7 13:00 34 0 0 0 0 34
1:15 60000 6 13:15 36 0 0 0 0 36
1:30 10000 1 13:30 32 0 0 0 0 32
1:45 50000 5 13:45 34 2 0 0 0 36
2:00 60000 6 14:00 33 0 0 0 0 33
2:15 30000 3 14:15 26 2 0 0 0 28
2:30 10000 1 14:30 34 0 0 0 0 34
2:45 50000 5 14:45 39 0 0 0 0 39
3:00 20000 2 15:00 49 0 0 0 0 49
3:15 20000 2 15:15 39 0 0 0 0 39
3:30 70000 7 15:30 26 0000 26
3:45 80000 8 15:45 65 0 0 0 0 65
4:00 30000 3 16:00 49 0 0 0 0 49
4:15 60000 6 16:15 59 1 0 0 0 60
4:30 40000 4 16:30 74 0 0 0 0 74
4:45 70000 7 16:45 52 0 0 0 0 52
5:00 60000 6 17:00 47 0 0 0 0 47
5:15 60000 6 17:15 51 0 0 0 0 51
5:30 30000 3 17:30 50 0 0 0 0 50
5:45 70000 7 17:45 55 0 0 0 0 55
6:00 50000 5 18:00 60 0 0 0 0 60
6:15 15 0 0 0 0 15 18:15 52 0 0 0 0 52
6:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 18:30 44 0 0 0 0 44
6:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 18:45 51 2 0 0 0 53
7:00 19 0 0 0 0 19 19:00 42 0 0 0 0 42
7:15 16 0 0 0 0 16 19:15 26 0 0 0 0 26
7:30 14 0 0 0 0 14 19:30 46 0 0 0 0 46
7:45 34 0 0 0 0 34 19:45 42 0000 42
8:00 30 0 0 0 0 30 20:00 44 0 0 0 0 44
8:15 39 0 0 0 0 39 20:15 35 0 0 0 0 35
8:30 28 0 0 0 0 28 20:30 29 0 0 0 0 29
8:45 27 0 0 0 0 27 20:45 33 0 0 0 0 33
9:00 22 0 0 0 0 22 21:00 31 0 0 0 0 31
9:15 21 0 0 0 0 21 21:15 27 0 0 0 0 27
9:30 20 2 0 0 0 22 21:30 27 0 0 0 0 27
9:45 24 2 0 0 0 26 21:45 27 0 0 0 0 27
10:00 19 1 0 0 0 20 22:00 22 0 0 0 0 22
10:15 17 1 0 0 0 18 22:15 24 0 0 0 0 24
10:30 21 0 0 0 0 21 22:30 21 0 0 0 0 21
10:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 22:45 22 0 0 0 0 22
11:00 31 0 1 0 0 32 23:00 12 0 0 0 0 12
11:15 28 0 0 0 0 28 23:15 11 0 0 0 0 11
11:30 21 1 0 0 0 22 23:30 90000 9
11:45 23 2 0 0 0 25 23:45 70000 7
TOTAL 629 9 1 0 0 639 TOTAL 1,767 9100 1,777
AM PEAK HOUR 7:45 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:45 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 131 AM PEAK VOLUME 248
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 2,396 18 2 0 0 2,416
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 99.2% 0.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 131 0 0 0 0 131
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 234 1 0 0 0 235
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 4 - Vesada Aparment Homes
416
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS74 Northern Dwy east of Country Village.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 20000 2 12:00 27 2 0 0 0 29
0:15 40000 4 12:15 33 0 0 0 0 33
0:30 20000 2 12:30 34 2 0 0 0 36
0:45 30000 3 12:45 28 1 0 0 0 29
1:00 20000 2 13:00 29 0 1 0 0 30
1:15 30000 3 13:15 44 0 0 0 0 44
1:30 50000 5 13:30 38 1 0 0 0 39
1:45 30000 3 13:45 29 1 0 0 0 30
2:00 20000 2 14:00 24 2 0 0 0 26
2:15 50000 5 14:15 22 0 0 0 0 22
2:30 10000 1 14:30 25 1 0 0 0 26
2:45 20000 2 14:45 35 0 0 0 0 35
3:00 50000 5 15:00 31 0 0 0 0 31
3:15 40000 4 15:15 21 0 0 0 0 21
3:30 16 0 0 0 0 16 15:30 29 0000 29
3:45 60000 6 15:45 29 0 0 0 0 29
4:00 17 0 0 0 0 17 16:00 26 0 0 0 0 26
4:15 60000 6 16:15 29 0 0 0 0 29
4:30 17 0 0 0 0 17 16:30 29 1 0 0 0 30
4:45 20 2 0 0 0 22 16:45 31 0 0 0 0 31
5:00 19 1 0 0 0 20 17:00 30 0 0 0 0 30
5:15 14 0 0 0 0 14 17:15 34 0 0 0 0 34
5:30 14 0 0 0 0 14 17:30 38 0 0 0 0 38
5:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 17:45 36 0 0 0 0 36
6:00 18 0 0 0 0 18 18:00 37 0 0 0 0 37
6:15 38 0 0 0 0 38 18:15 41 0 0 0 0 41
6:30 34 0 0 0 0 34 18:30 31 0 0 0 0 31
6:45 46 0 0 0 0 46 18:45 21 0 0 0 0 21
7:00 46 0 0 0 0 46 19:00 31 0 0 0 0 31
7:15 82 0 0 0 0 82 19:15 24 0 0 0 0 24
7:30 56 0 0 0 0 56 19:30 40 1 0 0 0 41
7:45 52 0 0 0 0 52 19:45 32 0000 32
8:00 48 0 0 0 0 48 20:00 30 0 0 0 0 30
8:15 59 1 0 0 0 60 20:15 17 0 0 0 0 17
8:30 26 0 0 0 0 26 20:30 17 0 0 0 0 17
8:45 32 1 0 0 0 33 20:45 19 0 0 0 0 19
9:00 27 0 0 0 0 27 21:00 15 0 0 0 0 15
9:15 26 0 0 0 0 26 21:15 14 0 0 0 0 14
9:30 31 1 0 0 0 32 21:30 12 0 0 0 0 12
9:45 36 0 0 0 0 36 21:45 19 0 0 0 0 19
10:00 28 0 0 0 0 28 22:00 13 0 0 0 0 13
10:15 32 1 0 0 0 33 22:15 15 0 0 0 0 15
10:30 32 0 0 0 0 32 22:30 11 0 0 0 0 11
10:45 23 0 0 0 0 23 22:45 10 0 0 0 0 10
11:00 29 0 0 0 0 29 23:00 50000 5
11:15 25 0 0 0 0 25 23:15 70000 7
11:30 32 0 1 0 0 33 23:30 10 0 0 0 0 10
11:45 33 2 0 0 0 35 23:45 30000 3
TOTAL 1,080 9100 1,090 TOTAL 1,205 12 1 0 0 1,218
AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 5:30 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 238 AM PEAK VOLUME 152
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 2,285 21 2 0 0 2,308
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 99.0% 0.9% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 238 0 0 0 0 238
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 138 0 0 0 0 138
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 4 - Vesada Aparment Homes
417
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS84 Northern Dwy east of Milky Way.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 40000 4 12:00 90000 9
0:15 10000 1 12:15 30000 3
0:30 10000 1 12:30 40000 4
0:45 00000 0 12:45 90000 9
1:00 10000 1 13:00 40000 4
1:15 00000 0 13:15 51000 6
1:30 10000 1 13:30 90000 9
1:45 00000 0 13:45 80000 8
2:00 00000 0 14:00 80000 8
2:15 00000 0 14:15 71000 8
2:30 00000 0 14:30 12 0 0 0 0 12
2:45 00000 0 14:45 13 0 0 0 0 13
3:00 10000 1 15:00 70000 7
3:15 10000 1 15:15 70000 7
3:30 00000 0 15:30 90000 9
3:45 00000 0 15:45 18 0000 18
4:00 10000 1 16:00 60000 6
4:15 10000 1 16:15 18 0 0 0 0 18
4:30 00000 0 16:30 11 0 0 0 0 11
4:45 00000 0 16:45 15 0 0 0 0 15
5:00 00000 0 17:00 80000 8
5:15 20000 2 17:15 12 0 0 0 0 12
5:30 00000 0 17:30 60000 6
5:45 10000 1 17:45 15 0 0 0 0 15
6:00 00000 0 18:00 60000 6
6:15 10000 1 18:15 80000 8
6:30 20000 2 18:30 60000 6
6:45 20000 2 18:45 80000 8
7:00 10000 1 19:00 60000 6
7:15 30000 3 19:15 10 0 0 0 0 10
7:30 50000 5 19:30 80000 8
7:45 50010 6 19:45 60000 6
8:00 80000 8 20:00 90000 9
8:15 41000 5 20:15 12 0000 12
8:30 40000 4 20:30 10 0 0 0 0 10
8:45 70000 7 20:45 80000 8
9:00 30000 3 21:00 80000 8
9:15 10000 1 21:15 80000 8
9:30 30000 3 21:30 20000 2
9:45 40000 4 21:45 70000 7
10:00 20000 2 22:00 40000 4
10:15 40000 4 22:15 20000 2
10:30 30000 3 22:30 40000 4
10:45 40000 4 22:45 40000 4
11:00 20000 2 23:00 40000 4
11:15 80000 8 23:15 10000 1
11:30 50000 5 23:30 20000 2
11:45 50000 5 23:45 10000 1
TOTAL 101 1 0 1 0 103 TOTAL 367 2 0 0 0 369
AM PEAK HOUR 8:00 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:45 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 24 AM PEAK VOLUME 53
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 468 3 0 1 0 472
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 99.2% 0.6% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 23 1 0 0 0 24
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 52 0 0 0 0 52
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 5 - Morning Ridge Apartments
418
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS84 Northern Dwy east of Milky Way.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 20000 2 12:00 60000 6
0:15 00000 0 12:15 11 1 0 0 0 12
0:30 00000 0 12:30 30000 3
0:45 20000 2 12:45 10 1 0 0 0 11
1:00 00000 0 13:00 70000 7
1:15 30000 3 13:15 90000 9
1:30 10000 1 13:30 42000 6
1:45 00000 0 13:45 11 0 0 0 0 11
2:00 00000 0 14:00 70000 7
2:15 10000 1 14:15 80000 8
2:30 00000 0 14:30 13 0 0 0 0 13
2:45 00000 0 14:45 81000 9
3:00 10000 1 15:00 70000 7
3:15 20000 2 15:15 60000 6
3:30 30000 3 15:30 12 0000 12
3:45 10000 1 15:45 50000 5
4:00 00000 0 16:00 19 0 0 0 0 19
4:15 30000 3 16:15 60000 6
4:30 30000 3 16:30 40000 4
4:45 20000 2 16:45 90000 9
5:00 20000 2 17:00 40000 4
5:15 30000 3 17:15 51000 6
5:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 17:30 11 0 0 0 0 11
5:45 90000 9 17:45 15 0 0 0 0 15
6:00 30000 3 18:00 10 0 0 0 0 10
6:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 18:15 50000 5
6:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 18:30 10 0 0 0 0 10
6:45 50000 5 18:45 70000 7
7:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 19:00 30000 3
7:15 19 0 0 0 0 19 19:15 20000 2
7:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 19:30 50000 5
7:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 19:45 30000 3
8:00 13 0000 13 20:00 70000 7
8:15 15 0 0 0 0 15 20:15 40000 4
8:30 14 0 0 0 0 14 20:30 40000 4
8:45 80000 8 20:45 20000 2
9:00 90000 9 21:00 50000 5
9:15 70000 7 21:15 30000 3
9:30 41000 5 21:30 20000 2
9:45 10 1 0 0 0 11 21:45 40000 4
10:00 70000 7 22:00 00000 0
10:15 40000 4 22:15 20000 2
10:30 10 1 0 0 0 11 22:30 00000 0
10:45 30000 3 22:45 10000 1
11:00 51000 6 23:00 10000 1
11:15 90000 9 23:15 10000 1
11:30 50000 5 23:30 10000 1
11:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 23:45 00000 0
TOTAL 274 4 0 0 0 278 TOTAL 282 6 0 0 0 288
AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 5:15 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 62 AM PEAK VOLUME 42
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 556 10 0 0 0 566
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 98.2% 1.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 62 0 0 0 0 62
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 38 0 0 0 0 38
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 5 - Morning Ridge Apartments
419
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS85 Middle Dwy east of Milky Way.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 30000 3 12:00 10 0 0 0 0 10
0:15 30000 3 12:15 10 0 0 0 0 10
0:30 00000 0 12:30 14 0 0 0 0 14
0:45 00000 0 12:45 12 0 0 0 0 12
1:00 00000 0 13:00 12 1 0 0 0 13
1:15 20000 2 13:15 12 1 0 0 0 13
1:30 60000 6 13:30 11 0 0 0 0 11
1:45 00000 0 13:45 80000 8
2:00 20000 2 14:00 11 1 0 0 0 12
2:15 10000 1 14:15 60000 6
2:30 00000 0 14:30 10 0 0 0 0 10
2:45 10000 1 14:45 13 0 0 0 0 13
3:00 00000 0 15:00 15 0 0 0 0 15
3:15 00000 0 15:15 10 0 0 0 0 10
3:30 00000 0 15:30 10 0000 10
3:45 00000 0 15:45 18 0 0 0 0 18
4:00 00000 0 16:00 18 0 0 0 0 18
4:15 10000 1 16:15 19 0 0 0 0 19
4:30 00000 0 16:30 20 0 0 0 0 20
4:45 10000 1 16:45 18 1 0 0 0 19
5:00 10000 1 17:00 20 0 0 0 0 20
5:15 00000 0 17:15 19 0 0 0 0 19
5:30 10000 1 17:30 19 0 0 0 0 19
5:45 00000 0 17:45 17 0 0 0 0 17
6:00 20000 2 18:00 11 0 0 0 0 11
6:15 20000 2 18:15 30 0 0 0 0 30
6:30 40000 4 18:30 15 0 0 0 0 15
6:45 20000 2 18:45 18 0 0 0 0 18
7:00 30000 3 19:00 23 3 0 0 0 26
7:15 30000 3 19:15 10 0 0 0 0 10
7:30 90000 9 19:30 19 0 0 0 0 19
7:45 90000 9 19:45 10 0000 10
8:00 50000 5 20:00 11 0 0 0 0 11
8:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 20:15 60000 6
8:30 40000 4 20:30 90000 9
8:45 90000 9 20:45 60000 6
9:00 20000 2 21:00 70000 7
9:15 30000 3 21:15 40000 4
9:30 90000 9 21:30 80000 8
9:45 70000 7 21:45 20000 2
10:00 50000 5 22:00 40000 4
10:15 30000 3 22:15 10000 1
10:30 60000 6 22:30 10000 1
10:45 80000 8 22:45 60000 6
11:00 60000 6 23:00 70000 7
11:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 23:15 10000 1
11:30 11 1 0 0 0 12 23:30 40000 4
11:45 70000 7 23:45 00000 0
TOTAL 167 1 0 0 0 168 TOTAL 545 7 0 0 0 552
AM PEAK HOUR 10:45 AM AM PEAK HOUR 6:15 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 39 AM PEAK VOLUME 89
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 712 8 0 0 0 720
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 98.9% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 31 0 0 0 0 31
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 75 1 0 0 0 76
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 5 - Morning Ridge Apartments
420
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS85 Middle Dwy east of Milky Way.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 00000 0 12:00 70000 7
0:15 30000 3 12:15 50000 5
0:30 00000 0 12:30 15 0 0 0 0 15
0:45 10000 1 12:45 14 0 0 0 0 14
1:00 00000 0 13:00 61000 7
1:15 10000 1 13:15 92000 11
1:30 10000 1 13:30 80000 8
1:45 00000 0 13:45 61000 7
2:00 00000 0 14:00 90000 9
2:15 00000 0 14:15 10 1 0 0 0 11
2:30 30000 3 14:30 80000 8
2:45 10000 1 14:45 12 2 0 0 0 14
3:00 00000 0 15:00 80000 8
3:15 00000 0 15:15 50000 5
3:30 50000 5 15:30 80000 8
3:45 00000 0 15:45 11 0000 11
4:00 00000 0 16:00 16 1 0 0 0 17
4:15 00000 0 16:15 11 0 0 0 0 11
4:30 52000 7 16:30 70000 7
4:45 30000 3 16:45 90000 9
5:00 10000 1 17:00 11 0 0 0 0 11
5:15 90000 9 17:15 12 0 0 0 0 12
5:30 82000 10 17:30 12 0 0 0 0 12
5:45 72000 9 17:45 12 0 0 0 0 12
6:00 60000 6 18:00 90000 9
6:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 18:15 50000 5
6:30 70000 7 18:30 11 0 0 0 0 11
6:45 80000 8 18:45 80000 8
7:00 60000 6 19:00 50000 5
7:15 80000 8 19:15 80000 8
7:30 27 3 0 0 0 30 19:30 80000 8
7:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 19:45 70000 7
8:00 25 0000 25 20:00 50000 5
8:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 20:15 60000 6
8:30 19 0 0 0 0 19 20:30 40000 4
8:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 20:45 30000 3
9:00 30000 3 21:00 60000 6
9:15 60000 6 21:15 20000 2
9:30 90000 9 21:30 30000 3
9:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 21:45 30000 3
10:00 50000 5 22:00 20000 2
10:15 80000 8 22:15 10000 1
10:30 70000 7 22:30 50000 5
10:45 80000 8 22:45 20000 2
11:00 80000 8 23:00 40000 4
11:15 80000 8 23:15 30000 3
11:30 50000 5 23:30 00000 0
11:45 90000 9 23:45 10000 1
TOTAL 295 9 0 0 0 304 TOTAL 342 8 0 0 0 350
AM PEAK HOUR 7:30 AM AM PEAK HOUR 5:00 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 85 AM PEAK VOLUME 47
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 637 17 0 0 0 654
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 97.4% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 82 3 0 0 0 85
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 47 0 0 0 0 47
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 5 - Morning Ridge Apartments
421
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS86 Southern Dwy east of Milky Way.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 10000 1 12:00 40000 4
0:15 00000 0 12:15 50000 5
0:30 20000 2 12:30 71000 8
0:45 00000 0 12:45 71000 8
1:00 10000 1 13:00 40000 4
1:15 20000 2 13:15 40000 4
1:30 10000 1 13:30 92000 11
1:45 10000 1 13:45 13 1 0 0 0 14
2:00 00000 0 14:00 11 0 0 0 0 11
2:15 00000 0 14:15 71000 8
2:30 00000 0 14:30 11 0 0 0 0 11
2:45 00000 0 14:45 11 2 0 0 0 13
3:00 10000 1 15:00 70000 7
3:15 10000 1 15:15 12 1 0 0 0 13
3:30 00000 0 15:30 80000 8
3:45 00000 0 15:45 90000 9
4:00 10000 1 16:00 50000 5
4:15 00000 0 16:15 70000 7
4:30 00000 0 16:30 16 0000 16
4:45 00000 0 16:45 14 0 0 0 0 14
5:00 20000 2 17:00 10 0 0 0 0 10
5:15 00000 0 17:15 91000 10
5:30 20000 2 17:30 10 1 0 0 0 11
5:45 00000 0 17:45 90000 9
6:00 20000 2 18:00 11 0 0 0 0 11
6:15 20000 2 18:15 16 0 0 0 0 16
6:30 20000 2 18:30 11 0 0 0 0 11
6:45 10000 1 18:45 10 0 0 0 0 10
7:00 50000 5 19:00 90000 9
7:15 40000 4 19:15 16 0 0 0 0 16
7:30 13000 4 19:30 11 0 0 0 0 11
7:45 50000 5 19:45 80000 8
8:00 70000 7 20:00 12 0000 12
8:15 20000 2 20:15 16 0 0 0 0 16
8:30 90000 9 20:30 40000 4
8:45 50000 5 20:45 40000 4
9:00 50000 5 21:00 90000 9
9:15 40000 4 21:15 80000 8
9:30 60000 6 21:30 70000 7
9:45 31000 4 21:45 40000 4
10:00 30000 3 22:00 50000 5
10:15 40000 4 22:15 60000 6
10:30 40000 4 22:30 70000 7
10:45 21000 3 22:45 40000 4
11:00 50000 5 23:00 10000 1
11:15 20000 2 23:15 30000 3
11:30 90000 9 23:30 40000 4
11:45 20000 2 23:45 30000 3
TOTAL 109 5 0 0 0 114 TOTAL 398 11 0 0 0 409
AM PEAK HOUR 8:30 AM AM PEAK HOUR 4:30 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 23 AM PEAK VOLUME 50
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 507 16 0 0 0 523
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 96.9% 3.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 23 0 0 0 0 23
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 49 1 0 0 0 50
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 5 - Morning Ridge Apartments
422
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS86 Southern Dwy east of Milky Way.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 10000 1 12:00 40000 4
0:15 00000 0 12:15 60000 6
0:30 10000 1 12:30 70000 7
0:45 00000 0 12:45 40000 4
1:00 20000 2 13:00 40000 4
1:15 00000 0 13:15 50000 5
1:30 30000 3 13:30 11 0 0 0 0 11
1:45 00000 0 13:45 41000 5
2:00 00000 0 14:00 14 0 0 0 0 14
2:15 00000 0 14:15 51000 6
2:30 00000 0 14:30 15 0 0 0 0 15
2:45 00000 0 14:45 60000 6
3:00 00000 0 15:00 50000 5
3:15 00000 0 15:15 60000 6
3:30 10000 1 15:30 10000 1
3:45 00000 0 15:45 50000 5
4:00 20000 2 16:00 60000 6
4:15 20000 2 16:15 60000 6
4:30 90000 9 16:30 90000 9
4:45 30000 3 16:45 13 0000 13
5:00 60000 6 17:00 10 0 0 0 0 10
5:15 90000 9 17:15 90000 9
5:30 80000 8 17:30 40000 4
5:45 50000 5 17:45 70000 7
6:00 80000 8 18:00 80000 8
6:15 70000 7 18:15 40000 4
6:30 80000 8 18:30 40000 4
6:45 30000 3 18:45 50000 5
7:00 40000 4 19:00 50000 5
7:15 50000 5 19:15 70000 7
7:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 19:30 40000 4
7:45 90000 9 19:45 30000 3
8:00 70000 7 20:00 40000 4
8:15 70010 8 20:15 30000 3
8:30 15 0000 15 20:30 40000 4
8:45 40000 4 20:45 40000 4
9:00 30000 3 21:00 20000 2
9:15 60000 6 21:15 70000 7
9:30 80000 8 21:30 20000 2
9:45 60000 6 21:45 40000 4
10:00 70000 7 22:00 00000 0
10:15 40000 4 22:15 40000 4
10:30 50000 5 22:30 10000 1
10:45 20000 2 22:45 10000 1
11:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 23:00 10000 1
11:15 40000 4 23:15 20000 2
11:30 50000 5 23:30 00000 0
11:45 70000 7 23:45 20000 2
TOTAL 208 0 0 1 0 209 TOTAL 247 2 0 0 0 249
AM PEAK HOUR 7:45 AM AM PEAK HOUR 4:30 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 39 AM PEAK VOLUME 41
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 455 2 0 1 0 458
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 99.3% 0.4% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 38 0 0 1 0 39
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 41 0 0 0 0 41
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 5 - Morning Ridge Apartments
423
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS71 Northern dwy west of Doolittle AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 00000 0 12:00 12 0 0 0 0 12
0:15 20000 2 12:15 90000 9
0:30 20000 2 12:30 11 0 0 0 0 11
0:45 30000 3 12:45 12 0 0 0 0 12
1:00 10000 1 13:00 50000 5
1:15 50000 5 13:15 70000 7
1:30 20000 2 13:30 11 0 0 0 0 11
1:45 30000 3 13:45 10 0 0 0 0 10
2:00 10000 1 14:00 16 0 0 0 0 16
2:15 10000 1 14:15 14 0 0 0 0 14
2:30 00000 0 14:30 23 0 0 0 0 23
2:45 00000 0 14:45 10 0 0 0 0 10
3:00 30000 3 15:00 17 0 0 0 0 17
3:15 30000 3 15:15 18 0 0 0 0 18
3:30 10000 1 15:30 14 0000 14
3:45 11000 2 15:45 16 0 0 0 0 16
4:00 10000 1 16:00 17 0 0 0 0 17
4:15 00000 0 16:15 16 0 0 0 0 16
4:30 10000 1 16:30 17 0 0 0 0 17
4:45 60000 6 16:45 12 0 0 0 0 12
5:00 30000 3 17:00 16 0 0 0 0 16
5:15 60000 6 17:15 22 0 0 0 0 22
5:30 00000 0 17:30 17 0 0 0 0 17
5:45 10000 1 17:45 17 0 0 0 0 17
6:00 20000 2 18:00 20 0 0 0 0 20
6:15 10000 1 18:15 10 0 0 0 0 10
6:30 20000 2 18:30 15 0 0 0 0 15
6:45 30000 3 18:45 15 0 0 0 0 15
7:00 30000 3 19:00 60000 6
7:15 40000 4 19:15 61000 7
7:30 40000 4 19:30 16 0 0 0 0 16
7:45 90000 9 19:45 10 0000 10
8:00 13 0 0 0 0 13 20:00 80000 8
8:15 70000 7 20:15 13 0 0 0 0 13
8:30 12 1 0 0 0 13 20:30 15 0 0 0 0 15
8:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 20:45 11 0 0 0 0 11
9:00 50000 5 21:00 14 0 0 0 0 14
9:15 30000 3 21:15 90000 9
9:30 40000 4 21:30 12 0 0 0 0 12
9:45 71000 8 21:45 12 0 0 0 0 12
10:00 20000 2 22:00 80000 8
10:15 50000 5 22:15 40000 4
10:30 60000 6 22:30 50000 5
10:45 70000 7 22:45 30000 3
11:00 81000 9 23:00 70000 7
11:15 10000 1 23:15 50000 5
11:30 50000 5 23:30 50000 5
11:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 23:45 20000 2
TOTAL 183 4 0 0 0 187 TOTAL 570 1 0 0 0 571
AM PEAK HOUR 8:00 AM AM PEAK HOUR 5:15 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 46 AM PEAK VOLUME 76
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 753 5 0 0 0 758
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 99.3% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 45 1 0 0 0 46
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 72 0 0 0 0 72
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 6 - Stonegate Apartments
424
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS71 Northern dwy west of Doolittle AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 00000 0 12:00 90000 9
0:15 00000 0 12:15 13 0 0 0 0 13
0:30 00000 0 12:30 13 1 0 0 0 14
0:45 20000 2 12:45 17 0 0 0 0 17
1:00 00000 0 13:00 60000 6
1:15 20000 2 13:15 12 0 0 0 0 12
1:30 10000 1 13:30 14 1 0 0 0 15
1:45 10000 1 13:45 20 0 0 0 0 20
2:00 00000 0 14:00 12 0 0 0 0 12
2:15 30000 3 14:15 80000 8
2:30 10000 1 14:30 13 0 0 0 0 13
2:45 00000 0 14:45 61000 7
3:00 00000 0 15:00 13 0 0 0 0 13
3:15 60000 6 15:15 12 0 0 0 0 12
3:30 50000 5 15:30 13 0000 13
3:45 60000 6 15:45 11 0 0 0 0 11
4:00 50000 5 16:00 12 0 0 0 0 12
4:15 40000 4 16:15 90000 9
4:30 60000 6 16:30 60000 6
4:45 40000 4 16:45 12 0 0 0 0 12
5:00 60000 6 17:00 80000 8
5:15 70000 7 17:15 13 0 0 0 0 13
5:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 17:30 14 0 0 0 0 14
5:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 17:45 80000 8
6:00 10000 1 18:00 11 0 0 0 0 11
6:15 70000 7 18:15 90000 9
6:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 18:30 50000 5
6:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 18:45 70000 7
7:00 80000 8 19:00 80000 8
7:15 16 0 0 0 0 16 19:15 90000 9
7:30 21 0 0 0 0 21 19:30 60000 6
7:45 18 0 0 0 0 18 19:45 80000 8
8:00 13 0000 13 20:00 60000 6
8:15 50000 5 20:15 11 0 0 0 0 11
8:30 70000 7 20:30 70000 7
8:45 80000 8 20:45 60000 6
9:00 10 0 1 0 0 11 21:00 40000 4
9:15 14 0 0 0 0 14 21:15 40000 4
9:30 71000 8 21:30 31000 4
9:45 70000 7 21:45 51000 6
10:00 71000 8 22:00 40000 4
10:15 51000 6 22:15 20000 2
10:30 51000 6 22:30 30000 3
10:45 10 2 0 0 0 12 22:45 00000 0
11:00 51000 6 23:00 60000 6
11:15 40000 4 23:15 00000 0
11:30 71000 8 23:30 20000 2
11:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 23:45 10000 1
TOTAL 309 8 1 0 0 318 TOTAL 401 5 0 0 0 406
AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 1:15 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 68 AM PEAK VOLUME 59
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 710 13 1 0 0 724
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 98.1% 1.8% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 68 0 0 0 0 68
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 47 0 0 0 0 47
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 6 - Stonegate Apartments
425
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS72 Southern dwy west of Doolittle AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 20000 2 12:00 19 1 0 0 0 20
0:15 10000 1 12:15 16 1 0 0 0 17
0:30 20000 2 12:30 16 0 0 0 0 16
0:45 20000 2 12:45 11 0 0 0 0 11
1:00 20000 2 13:00 12 0 0 0 0 12
1:15 10000 1 13:15 18 0 0 0 0 18
1:30 00000 0 13:30 13 1 0 0 0 14
1:45 00000 0 13:45 50000 5
2:00 20000 2 14:00 18 0 0 0 0 18
2:15 10000 1 14:15 13 0 0 0 0 13
2:30 00000 0 14:30 15 0 0 0 0 15
2:45 00000 0 14:45 17 1 0 0 0 18
3:00 00000 0 15:00 21 0 0 0 0 21
3:15 20000 2 15:15 19 2 0 0 0 21
3:30 00000 0 15:30 11 0000 11
3:45 10000 1 15:45 19 1 0 0 0 20
4:00 10000 1 16:00 24 0 0 0 0 24
4:15 00000 0 16:15 13 0 0 0 0 13
4:30 00000 0 16:30 90000 9
4:45 00000 0 16:45 18 0 0 0 0 18
5:00 10000 1 17:00 24 0 0 0 0 24
5:15 10000 1 17:15 15 0 0 0 0 15
5:30 20000 2 17:30 21 0 0 0 0 21
5:45 10000 1 17:45 23 0 0 0 0 23
6:00 00000 0 18:00 12 0 0 0 0 12
6:15 40000 4 18:15 13 0 0 0 0 13
6:30 30000 3 18:30 12 0 0 0 0 12
6:45 30000 3 18:45 11 0 0 0 0 11
7:00 40000 4 19:00 13 0 0 0 0 13
7:15 42000 6 19:15 21 0 0 0 0 21
7:30 61000 7 19:30 50000 5
7:45 40000 4 19:45 10 0000 10
8:00 13 0 0 0 0 13 20:00 13 1 0 0 0 14
8:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 20:15 12 0 0 0 0 12
8:30 10 0 1 0 0 11 20:30 17 0 0 0 0 17
8:45 60000 6 20:45 10 0 0 0 0 10
9:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 21:00 11 0 0 0 0 11
9:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 21:15 81000 9
9:30 10 1 0 0 0 11 21:30 10000 1
9:45 70000 7 21:45 90000 9
10:00 50100 6 22:00 40000 4
10:15 10 2 0 0 0 12 22:15 20000 2
10:30 21 1 0 0 0 22 22:30 50000 5
10:45 71000 8 22:45 50000 5
11:00 14 0 0 0 0 14 23:00 30000 3
11:15 10 2 0 0 0 12 23:15 20000 2
11:30 18 1 0 0 0 19 23:30 40000 4
11:45 10 0 0 0 0 10 23:45 10000 1
TOTAL 225 11 2 0 0 238 TOTAL 594 9 0 0 0 603
AM PEAK HOUR 10:30 AM AM PEAK HOUR 5:00 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 56 AM PEAK VOLUME 83
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 819 20 2 0 0 841
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 97.4% 2.4% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 38 0 1 0 0 39
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 83 0 0 0 0 83
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 6 - Stonegate Apartments
426
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS72 Southern dwy west of Doolittle AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 00000 0 12:00 14 0 0 0 0 14
0:15 10000 1 12:15 30000 3
0:30 20000 2 12:30 50000 5
0:45 20000 2 12:45 16 0 0 0 0 16
1:00 00000 0 13:00 40000 4
1:15 20000 2 13:15 80000 8
1:30 00000 0 13:30 60000 6
1:45 10000 1 13:45 11 1 0 0 0 12
2:00 20000 2 14:00 50000 5
2:15 10000 1 14:15 60000 6
2:30 00000 0 14:30 10 0 0 0 0 10
2:45 00000 0 14:45 60000 6
3:00 00000 0 15:00 60000 6
3:15 00000 0 15:15 30000 3
3:30 30000 3 15:30 10 0000 10
3:45 30000 3 15:45 12 0 0 0 0 12
4:00 61000 7 16:00 12 0 0 0 0 12
4:15 20000 2 16:15 80000 8
4:30 20000 2 16:30 80000 8
4:45 20000 2 16:45 12 0 0 0 0 12
5:00 00000 0 17:00 70000 7
5:15 50000 5 17:15 80000 8
5:30 70000 7 17:30 80000 8
5:45 50000 5 17:45 60000 6
6:00 50000 5 18:00 80000 8
6:15 40000 4 18:15 90000 9
6:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 18:30 60000 6
6:45 40000 4 18:45 60000 6
7:00 50000 5 19:00 40000 4
7:15 60000 6 19:15 90000 9
7:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 19:30 80000 8
7:45 18 0 0 0 0 18 19:45 40000 4
8:00 80000 8 20:00 30000 3
8:15 11 0000 11 20:15 50000 5
8:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 20:30 50000 5
8:45 10000 1 20:45 20000 2
9:00 40000 4 21:00 30000 3
9:15 90000 9 21:15 20000 2
9:30 80000 8 21:30 50000 5
9:45 80000 8 21:45 40000 4
10:00 30000 3 22:00 30000 3
10:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 22:15 30000 3
10:30 90000 9 22:30 20000 2
10:45 90000 9 22:45 40000 4
11:00 70000 7 23:00 20000 2
11:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 23:15 20000 2
11:30 80000 8 23:30 30000 3
11:45 80000 8 23:45 00000 0
TOTAL 235 1 0 0 0 236 TOTAL 296 1 0 0 0 297
AM PEAK HOUR 7:45 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:30 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 48 AM PEAK VOLUME 42
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 531 2 0 0 0 533
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 99.6% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 48 0 0 0 0 48
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 40 0 0 0 0 40
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 6 - Stonegate Apartments
427
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS82 Dwy east of Elm.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 00000 0 12:00 00000 0
0:15 00000 0 12:15 00000 0
0:30 00000 0 12:30 00000 0
0:45 00000 0 12:45 00000 0
1:00 00000 0 13:00 00000 0
1:15 00000 0 13:15 00000 0
1:30 00000 0 13:30 00000 0
1:45 00000 0 13:45 00000 0
2:00 00000 0 14:00 00000 0
2:15 00000 0 14:15 00000 0
2:30 00000 0 14:30 00000 0
2:45 00000 0 14:45 00000 0
3:00 00000 0 15:00 00000 0
3:15 00000 0 15:15 00000 0
3:30 00000 0 15:30 00000 0
3:45 00000 0 15:45 00000 0
4:00 00000 0 16:00 00000 0
4:15 00000 0 16:15 00000 0
4:30 00000 0 16:30 00000 0
4:45 00000 0 16:45 00000 0
5:00 00000 0 17:00 00000 0
5:15 00000 0 17:15 00000 0
5:30 00000 0 17:30 00000 0
5:45 00000 0 17:45 00000 0
6:00 00000 0 18:00 00000 0
6:15 00000 0 18:15 00000 0
6:30 00000 0 18:30 00000 0
6:45 00000 0 18:45 00000 0
7:00 00000 0 19:00 00000 0
7:15 00000 0 19:15 00000 0
7:30 00000 0 19:30 00000 0
7:45 00000 0 19:45 00000 0
8:00 00000 0 20:00 00000 0
8:15 00000 0 20:15 00000 0
8:30 10000 1 20:30 00000 0
8:45 00000 0 20:45 00000 0
9:00 00000 0 21:00 00000 0
9:15 00000 0 21:15 00000 0
9:30 00000 0 21:30 00000 0
9:45 00000 0 21:45 00000 0
10:00 00000 0 22:00 00000 0
10:15 00000 0 22:15 00000 0
10:30 00000 0 22:30 00000 0
10:45 00000 0 22:45 00000 0
11:00 00000 0 23:00 00000 0
11:15 10000 1 23:15 00000 0
11:30 00000 0 23:30 00000 0
11:45 00000 0 23:45 00000 0
TOTAL 200002 TOTAL 000000
AM PEAK HOUR 11:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 11:45 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 1 AM PEAK VOLUME 0
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 200002
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 1 0 0 0 0 1
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 0 0 0 0 0 0
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 7 - River's Edge Apartment Homes
428
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS82 Dwy east of Elm.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 00000 0 12:00 00000 0
0:15 00000 0 12:15 21000 3
0:30 00000 0 12:30 20000 2
0:45 00000 0 12:45 10000 1
1:00 00000 0 13:00 00000 0
1:15 00000 0 13:15 10000 1
1:30 00000 0 13:30 10000 1
1:45 00000 0 13:45 40000 4
2:00 00000 0 14:00 10000 1
2:15 10000 1 14:15 40000 4
2:30 00000 0 14:30 00000 0
2:45 10000 1 14:45 11000 2
3:00 00000 0 15:00 30000 3
3:15 00000 0 15:15 30010 4
3:30 00000 0 15:30 20000 2
3:45 00000 0 15:45 20000 2
4:00 00000 0 16:00 30000 3
4:15 00000 0 16:15 30000 3
4:30 00000 0 16:30 11000 2
4:45 00000 0 16:45 20000 2
5:00 00000 0 17:00 00000 0
5:15 00000 0 17:15 00000 0
5:30 00000 0 17:30 20000 2
5:45 20000 2 17:45 00000 0
6:00 10000 1 18:00 30000 3
6:15 00000 0 18:15 00000 0
6:30 00000 0 18:30 10000 1
6:45 00000 0 18:45 20000 2
7:00 00000 0 19:00 30000 3
7:15 10000 1 19:15 10000 1
7:30 20000 2 19:30 10000 1
7:45 70000 7 19:45 10000 1
8:00 50000 5 20:00 00000 0
8:15 10000 1 20:15 10000 1
8:30 40000 4 20:30 20000 2
8:45 10000 1 20:45 20000 2
9:00 40000 4 21:00 10000 1
9:15 10000 1 21:15 10000 1
9:30 20000 2 21:30 00000 0
9:45 00000 0 21:45 40000 4
10:00 00000 0 22:00 10000 1
10:15 10000 1 22:15 00000 0
10:30 10000 1 22:30 10000 1
10:45 00000 0 22:45 00000 0
11:00 00000 0 23:00 00000 0
11:15 11000 2 23:15 00000 0
11:30 20000 2 23:30 20000 2
11:45 01000 1 23:45 00000 0
TOTAL 38 2 0 0 0 40 TOTAL 65 3 0 1 0 69
AM PEAK HOUR 7:45 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:15 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 17 AM PEAK VOLUME 11
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 103 5 0 1 0 109
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 94.5% 4.6% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 17 0 0 0 0 17
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 9 1 0 0 0 10
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 7 - River's Edge Apartment Homes
429
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS83 Dwy south of Lakeshore.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 30000 3 12:00 23 3 0 0 0 26
0:15 20000 2 12:15 17 2 0 0 0 19
0:30 40000 4 12:30 22 0 0 0 0 22
0:45 30000 3 12:45 15 0 0 0 0 15
1:00 20000 2 13:00 17 0 0 0 0 17
1:15 20000 2 13:15 17 2 0 0 0 19
1:30 00000 0 13:30 15 0 0 0 0 15
1:45 30000 3 13:45 36 0 0 0 0 36
2:00 20000 2 14:00 29 0 0 0 0 29
2:15 20000 2 14:15 25 2 0 0 0 27
2:30 30000 3 14:30 13 2 0 0 0 15
2:45 50000 5 14:45 32 1 0 1 0 34
3:00 20000 2 15:00 27 0 0 0 0 27
3:15 00000 0 15:15 19 0 0 0 0 19
3:30 10000 1 15:30 25 1000 26
3:45 10000 1 15:45 43 0 0 0 0 43
4:00 20000 2 16:00 36 0 0 0 0 36
4:15 10000 1 16:15 23 1 0 0 0 24
4:30 20000 2 16:30 41 0 0 0 0 41
4:45 21000 3 16:45 35 0 0 0 0 35
5:00 30000 3 17:00 42 2 0 0 0 44
5:15 30000 3 17:15 35 0 0 0 0 35
5:30 20000 2 17:30 32 0 0 0 0 32
5:45 70000 7 17:45 27 0 0 0 0 27
6:00 60000 6 18:00 45 0 0 0 0 45
6:15 60000 6 18:15 40 0 0 0 0 40
6:30 30000 3 18:30 35 1 0 0 0 36
6:45 10000 1 18:45 30 0 0 0 0 30
7:00 81000 9 19:00 32 0 0 0 0 32
7:15 41000 5 19:15 29 0 0 0 0 29
7:30 21 0 0 0 0 21 19:30 23 0 0 0 0 23
7:45 28 0 0 0 0 28 19:45 27 0000 27
8:00 17 0 0 0 0 17 20:00 37 1 0 0 0 38
8:15 28 0 0 0 0 28 20:15 18 0 0 0 0 18
8:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 20:30 20 0 0 0 0 20
8:45 14 1 0 0 0 15 20:45 20 0 0 0 0 20
9:00 13 0 0 0 0 13 21:00 31 0 0 0 0 31
9:15 15 1 0 0 0 16 21:15 14 0 0 0 0 14
9:30 12 2 0 0 0 14 21:30 17 0 0 0 0 17
9:45 14 1 0 0 0 15 21:45 15 0 0 0 0 15
10:00 15 3 0 0 0 18 22:00 14 0 0 0 0 14
10:15 15 1 0 0 0 16 22:15 90000 9
10:30 10 2 0 0 0 12 22:30 11 0 0 0 0 11
10:45 10 1 0 0 0 11 22:45 10 0 0 0 0 10
11:00 12 2 0 0 0 14 23:00 60000 6
11:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 23:15 10 0 0 0 0 10
11:30 22 0 0 0 0 22 23:30 50000 5
11:45 26 0 0 0 0 26 23:45 70000 7
TOTAL 380 17 0 0 0 397 TOTAL 1,151 18 0 1 0 1,170
AM PEAK HOUR 7:30 AM AM PEAK HOUR 4:30 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 94 AM PEAK VOLUME 155
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 1,531 35 0 1 0 1,567
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 97.7% 2.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 94 0 0 0 0 94
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 153 2 0 0 0 155
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 7 - River's Edge Apartment Homes
430
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS83 Dwy south of Lakeshore.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 70000 7 12:00 21 0 0 0 0 21
0:15 10000 1 12:15 15 0 0 0 0 15
0:30 10000 1 12:30 20 1 0 0 0 21
0:45 00000 0 12:45 14 1 0 0 0 15
1:00 10000 1 13:00 15 0 0 0 0 15
1:15 30000 3 13:15 16 0 0 0 0 16
1:30 20000 2 13:30 22 1 0 0 0 23
1:45 20000 2 13:45 24 1 0 0 0 25
2:00 20000 2 14:00 23 0 0 0 0 23
2:15 00000 0 14:15 15 0 0 0 0 15
2:30 00000 0 14:30 25 1 0 0 0 26
2:45 10000 1 14:45 26 1 0 0 0 27
3:00 20000 2 15:00 18 1 0 0 0 19
3:15 50000 5 15:15 31 0 0 0 0 31
3:30 30000 3 15:30 23 0000 23
3:45 60000 6 15:45 31 1 0 0 0 32
4:00 30000 3 16:00 15 0 0 0 0 15
4:15 90000 9 16:15 23 0 0 0 0 23
4:30 90000 9 16:30 25 0 0 0 0 25
4:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 16:45 27 0 0 0 0 27
5:00 70000 7 17:00 32 0 0 0 0 32
5:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 17:15 25 0 0 0 0 25
5:30 15 1 0 0 0 16 17:30 18 0 0 0 0 18
5:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 17:45 20 0 0 0 0 20
6:00 12 1 0 0 0 13 18:00 18 0 0 0 0 18
6:15 19 0 0 0 0 19 18:15 24 0 0 0 0 24
6:30 23 0 0 0 0 23 18:30 25 1 0 0 0 26
6:45 16 1 0 0 0 17 18:45 16 0 0 0 0 16
7:00 13 2 0 0 0 15 19:00 90000 9
7:15 35 0 0 0 0 35 19:15 11 0 0 0 0 11
7:30 55 0 0 0 0 55 19:30 11 0 0 0 0 11
7:45 40 0 0 0 0 40 19:45 15 0000 15
8:00 35 0 0 0 0 35 20:00 90000 9
8:15 20 0 0 0 0 20 20:15 13 0 0 0 0 13
8:30 17 0 0 0 0 17 20:30 15 1 0 0 0 16
8:45 18 0 0 0 0 18 20:45 13 0 0 0 0 13
9:00 21 0 0 0 0 21 21:00 12 0 0 0 0 12
9:15 28 0 0 0 0 28 21:15 70000 7
9:30 24 1 0 0 0 25 21:30 61000 7
9:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 21:45 70000 7
10:00 21 2 0 0 0 23 22:00 70000 7
10:15 26 3 0 0 0 29 22:15 60000 6
10:30 16 2 0 0 0 18 22:30 50000 5
10:45 16 3 0 0 0 19 22:45 70000 7
11:00 15 0 0 0 0 15 23:00 60000 6
11:15 14 1 0 0 0 15 23:15 30000 3
11:30 21 0 0 0 0 21 23:30 40000 4
11:45 16 1 0 0 0 17 23:45 20000 2
TOTAL 656 18 0 0 0 674 TOTAL 775 11 0 0 0 786
AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 4:30 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 165 AM PEAK VOLUME 109
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 1,431 29 0 0 0 1,460
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 98.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 165 0 0 0 0 165
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 109 0 0 0 0 109
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 7 - River's Edge Apartment Homes
431
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS90 Western Dwy south of Mayberry.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 10000 1 12:00 30000 3
0:15 10000 1 12:15 12 0 0 0 0 12
0:30 20000 2 12:30 60000 6
0:45 00000 0 12:45 30000 3
1:00 10000 1 13:00 10000 1
1:15 30000 3 13:15 10 0 0 1 0 11
1:30 00000 0 13:30 90000 9
1:45 10000 1 13:45 60000 6
2:00 00000 0 14:00 10 0 0 0 0 10
2:15 30000 3 14:15 80000 8
2:30 20000 2 14:30 12 0 0 0 0 12
2:45 00000 0 14:45 18 0 0 0 0 18
3:00 40000 4 15:00 13 0 0 0 0 13
3:15 10000 1 15:15 70000 7
3:30 30000 3 15:30 17 1000 18
3:45 10000 1 15:45 17 0 0 0 0 17
4:00 00000 0 16:00 60000 6
4:15 00000 0 16:15 80000 8
4:30 00000 0 16:30 90000 9
4:45 20000 2 16:45 15 0 0 0 0 15
5:00 00000 0 17:00 90000 9
5:15 20000 2 17:15 10 0 0 0 0 10
5:30 00000 0 17:30 14 0 0 0 0 14
5:45 00000 0 17:45 11 0 0 0 0 11
6:00 30000 3 18:00 81000 9
6:15 50000 5 18:15 12 0 0 0 0 12
6:30 60000 6 18:30 90000 9
6:45 00000 0 18:45 81000 9
7:00 20000 2 19:00 40000 4
7:15 50000 5 19:15 90000 9
7:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 19:30 80000 8
7:45 30000 3 19:45 70000 7
8:00 40000 4 20:00 80000 8
8:15 70000 7 20:15 20000 2
8:30 11 0000 11 20:30 90000 9
8:45 10000 1 20:45 50000 5
9:00 50000 5 21:00 70000 7
9:15 30000 3 21:15 30000 3
9:30 20000 2 21:30 10000 1
9:45 40000 4 21:45 20000 2
10:00 50000 5 22:00 20000 2
10:15 22000 4 22:15 20000 2
10:30 50000 5 22:30 30000 3
10:45 30000 3 22:45 40000 4
11:00 50000 5 23:00 30000 3
11:15 60000 6 23:15 50000 5
11:30 60000 6 23:30 40000 4
11:45 30000 3 23:45 10000 1
TOTAL 135 2 0 0 0 137 TOTAL 360 3 0 1 0 364
AM PEAK HOUR 7:30 AM AM PEAK HOUR 2:45 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 26 AM PEAK VOLUME 56
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 495 5 0 1 0 501
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 98.8% 1.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 26 0 0 0 0 26
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 44 0 0 0 0 44
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 8 - Mayberry Colony Apartments
432
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS90 Western Dwy south of Mayberry.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 00000 0 12:00 11 0 0 0 0 11
0:15 10000 1 12:15 11 0 0 0 0 11
0:30 00000 0 12:30 90000 9
0:45 10000 1 12:45 80000 8
1:00 00000 0 13:00 60000 6
1:15 10000 1 13:15 60000 6
1:30 00000 0 13:30 30000 3
1:45 20000 2 13:45 70000 7
2:00 00000 0 14:00 12 0 0 0 0 12
2:15 00000 0 14:15 14 0 0 0 0 14
2:30 00000 0 14:30 10 0 0 0 0 10
2:45 30000 3 14:45 11 0 0 0 0 11
3:00 20000 2 15:00 10 0 0 0 0 10
3:15 50000 5 15:15 90000 9
3:30 50000 5 15:30 80000 8
3:45 40000 4 15:45 70000 7
4:00 00000 0 16:00 11 0000 11
4:15 50000 5 16:15 10 0 0 0 0 10
4:30 70000 7 16:30 10 0 0 0 0 10
4:45 30000 3 16:45 80000 8
5:00 80000 8 17:00 16 0 0 0 0 16
5:15 00000 0 17:15 13 1 0 0 0 14
5:30 20000 2 17:30 12 0 0 0 0 12
5:45 60000 6 17:45 13 0 0 0 0 13
6:00 40000 4 18:00 11 0 0 0 0 11
6:15 30000 3 18:15 50000 5
6:30 90000 9 18:30 70000 7
6:45 80000 8 18:45 12 0 0 0 0 12
7:00 70000 7 19:00 80000 8
7:15 21 0 0 0 0 21 19:15 50000 5
7:30 40000 4 19:30 70000 7
7:45 70000 7 19:45 60000 6
8:00 21 0000 21 20:00 50000 5
8:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 20:15 70000 7
8:30 80010 9 20:30 60000 6
8:45 70000 7 20:45 30000 3
9:00 90000 9 21:00 10000 1
9:15 50000 5 21:15 50000 5
9:30 30000 3 21:30 30000 3
9:45 20000 2 21:45 50000 5
10:00 91000 10 22:00 10000 1
10:15 43000 7 22:15 10000 1
10:30 21000 3 22:30 00000 0
10:45 90000 9 22:45 20000 2
11:00 11 0 0 0 0 11 23:00 20000 2
11:15 20000 2 23:15 40000 4
11:30 50000 5 23:30 50000 5
11:45 80000 8 23:45 20000 2
TOTAL 233 5 0 1 0 239 TOTAL 348 1 0 0 0 349
AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 5:00 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 53 AM PEAK VOLUME 55
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 581 6 0 1 0 588
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 98.8% 1.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 53 0 0 0 0 53
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 54 1 0 0 0 55
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 8 - Mayberry Colony Apartments
433
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS91 Eastern Dwy south of Mayberry.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 30000 3 12:00 80000 8
0:15 30000 3 12:15 80000 8
0:30 10000 1 12:30 30000 3
0:45 10000 1 12:45 50000 5
1:00 00000 0 13:00 70000 7
1:15 40000 4 13:15 40000 4
1:30 00000 0 13:30 70000 7
1:45 10000 1 13:45 20000 2
2:00 10000 1 14:00 90000 9
2:15 10000 1 14:15 14 0 0 0 0 14
2:30 00000 0 14:30 14 0 0 0 0 14
2:45 10000 1 14:45 80000 8
3:00 00000 0 15:00 20000 2
3:15 00000 0 15:15 10000 1
3:30 30000 3 15:30 30000 3
3:45 00000 0 15:45 30000 3
4:00 00000 0 16:00 90000 9
4:15 10000 1 16:15 90000 9
4:30 10000 1 16:30 70000 7
4:45 00000 0 16:45 13 0000 13
5:00 00000 0 17:00 81000 9
5:15 00000 0 17:15 12 0 0 0 0 12
5:30 30000 3 17:30 70000 7
5:45 30000 3 17:45 11 0 0 0 0 11
6:00 00000 0 18:00 14 0 0 0 0 14
6:15 00000 0 18:15 60000 6
6:30 20000 2 18:30 30000 3
6:45 00000 0 18:45 13 0 0 0 0 13
7:00 12 0 0 0 0 12 19:00 14 0 0 0 0 14
7:15 70000 7 19:15 10 0 0 0 0 10
7:30 40000 4 19:30 20000 2
7:45 80000 8 19:45 80000 8
8:00 30000 3 20:00 30000 3
8:15 60000 6 20:15 40000 4
8:30 60010 7 20:30 40000 4
8:45 70000 7 20:45 70000 7
9:00 50000 5 21:00 20000 2
9:15 30000 3 21:15 30000 3
9:30 50000 5 21:30 30000 3
9:45 32000 5 21:45 30000 3
10:00 20000 2 22:00 20000 2
10:15 32000 5 22:15 20000 2
10:30 50000 5 22:30 60000 6
10:45 40000 4 22:45 20000 2
11:00 20000 2 23:00 10000 1
11:15 30000 3 23:15 10000 1
11:30 70000 7 23:30 30000 3
11:45 30000 3 23:45 20000 2
TOTAL 127 4 0 1 0 132 TOTAL 292 1 0 0 0 293
AM PEAK HOUR 7:00 AM AM PEAK HOUR 2:00 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 31 AM PEAK VOLUME 45
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 419 5 0 1 0 425
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 98.6% 1.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 31 0 0 0 0 31
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 40 1 0 0 0 41
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 8 - Mayberry Colony Apartments
434
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS91 Eastern Dwy south of Mayberry.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 00000 0 12:00 70000 7
0:15 00000 0 12:15 50000 5
0:30 10000 1 12:30 30000 3
0:45 00000 0 12:45 30000 3
1:00 00000 0 13:00 40000 4
1:15 00000 0 13:15 90000 9
1:30 10000 1 13:30 40010 5
1:45 00000 0 13:45 50000 5
2:00 00000 0 14:00 11 0 0 0 0 11
2:15 00000 0 14:15 80000 8
2:30 20000 2 14:30 20000 2
2:45 10000 1 14:45 40000 4
3:00 10000 1 15:00 70000 7
3:15 00000 0 15:15 50000 5
3:30 00000 0 15:30 71000 8
3:45 00000 0 15:45 11 0000 11
4:00 10000 1 16:00 50000 5
4:15 10000 1 16:15 10 0 0 0 0 10
4:30 10000 1 16:30 70000 7
4:45 30000 3 16:45 30000 3
5:00 10000 1 17:00 20000 2
5:15 30000 3 17:15 40000 4
5:30 30000 3 17:30 50000 5
5:45 70000 7 17:45 70000 7
6:00 20000 2 18:00 30000 3
6:15 20000 2 18:15 40000 4
6:30 30000 3 18:30 30000 3
6:45 90000 9 18:45 50000 5
7:00 11 0 0 0 0 11 19:00 20000 2
7:15 90000 9 19:15 40000 4
7:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 19:30 00000 0
7:45 60000 6 19:45 00000 0
8:00 10000 1 20:00 20000 2
8:15 30000 3 20:15 20000 2
8:30 11 0000 11 20:30 20000 2
8:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 20:45 10000 1
9:00 20000 2 21:00 10000 1
9:15 20000 2 21:15 10000 1
9:30 40000 4 21:30 00000 0
9:45 40000 4 21:45 00000 0
10:00 10000 1 22:00 20000 2
10:15 71000 8 22:15 20000 2
10:30 50000 5 22:30 10000 1
10:45 50000 5 22:45 40000 4
11:00 10000 1 23:00 20000 2
11:15 30000 3 23:15 00000 0
11:30 40000 4 23:30 20000 2
11:45 30000 3 23:45 00000 0
TOTAL 147 1 0 0 0 148 TOTAL 181 1 0 1 0 183
AM PEAK HOUR 6:45 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:30 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 39 AM PEAK VOLUME 34
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 328 2 0 1 0 331
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 99.1% 0.6% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 36 0 0 0 0 36
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 25 0 0 0 0 25
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 8 - Mayberry Colony Apartments
435
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS92 DWY west of Hathaway.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 10000 1 12:00 90000 9
0:15 10000 1 12:15 60100 7
0:30 20000 2 12:30 70000 7
0:45 20000 2 12:45 50000 5
1:00 20000 2 13:00 40000 4
1:15 10000 1 13:15 30000 3
1:30 00000 0 13:30 80000 8
1:45 00000 0 13:45 71000 8
2:00 10000 1 14:00 10 1 0 0 0 11
2:15 00000 0 14:15 50000 5
2:30 00000 0 14:30 11 0 0 0 0 11
2:45 00000 0 14:45 40000 4
3:00 10000 1 15:00 50000 5
3:15 10000 1 15:15 60000 6
3:30 00000 0 15:30 13 0000 13
3:45 10000 1 15:45 12 0 0 0 0 12
4:00 00000 0 16:00 13 0 0 0 0 13
4:15 10000 1 16:15 70000 7
4:30 30000 3 16:30 90000 9
4:45 20000 2 16:45 30000 3
5:00 00000 0 17:00 70000 7
5:15 10000 1 17:15 80000 8
5:30 10000 1 17:30 70000 7
5:45 10000 1 17:45 70000 7
6:00 00000 0 18:00 80000 8
6:15 10100 2 18:15 50000 5
6:30 10000 1 18:30 90000 9
6:45 20000 2 18:45 70000 7
7:00 30000 3 19:00 41000 5
7:15 20000 2 19:15 70000 7
7:30 20000 2 19:30 90000 9
7:45 40000 4 19:45 60000 6
8:00 50000 5 20:00 10 0000 10
8:15 70000 7 20:15 70000 7
8:30 30000 3 20:30 60000 6
8:45 70000 7 20:45 40000 4
9:00 20000 2 21:00 80000 8
9:15 40000 4 21:15 50000 5
9:30 40000 4 21:30 50000 5
9:45 31000 4 21:45 50000 5
10:00 70000 7 22:00 40000 4
10:15 20000 2 22:15 12 0 0 0 0 12
10:30 20000 2 22:30 40000 4
10:45 30000 3 22:45 50000 5
11:00 10000 1 23:00 40000 4
11:15 70000 7 23:15 10000 1
11:30 41000 5 23:30 10000 1
11:45 30000 3 23:45 00000 0
TOTAL 101 2 1 0 0 104 TOTAL 312 3 1 0 0 316
AM PEAK HOUR 8:00 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:30 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 22 AM PEAK VOLUME 45
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 413 5 2 0 0 420
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 98.3% 1.2% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 22 0 0 0 0 22
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 32 0 0 0 0 32
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 9 - Summit Ridge Apartments
436
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS92 DWY west of Hathaway.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 00000 0 12:00 30100 4
0:15 00000 0 12:15 90000 9
0:30 10000 1 12:30 90000 9
0:45 00000 0 12:45 30000 3
1:00 00000 0 13:00 60000 6
1:15 00000 0 13:15 31000 4
1:30 00000 0 13:30 90000 9
1:45 00000 0 13:45 30000 3
2:00 00000 0 14:00 81000 9
2:15 10000 1 14:15 70000 7
2:30 10000 1 14:30 90000 9
2:45 00000 0 14:45 10000 1
3:00 00000 0 15:00 60000 6
3:15 10000 1 15:15 80000 8
3:30 30000 3 15:30 10 0000 10
3:45 00000 0 15:45 91000 10
4:00 20000 2 16:00 80000 8
4:15 00000 0 16:15 40000 4
4:30 10000 1 16:30 60000 6
4:45 00000 0 16:45 20000 2
5:00 20000 2 17:00 41000 5
5:15 10000 1 17:15 80000 8
5:30 20000 2 17:30 90000 9
5:45 10 0 0 0 0 10 17:45 60000 6
6:00 20000 2 18:00 30000 3
6:15 70000 7 18:15 50000 5
6:30 00000 0 18:30 40000 4
6:45 40100 5 18:45 30000 3
7:00 30000 3 19:00 50000 5
7:15 40000 4 19:15 41000 5
7:30 30000 3 19:30 40000 4
7:45 80000 8 19:45 20000 2
8:00 90000 9 20:00 50000 5
8:15 90000 9 20:15 30000 3
8:30 30000 3 20:30 20000 2
8:45 80000 8 20:45 20000 2
9:00 80000 8 21:00 40000 4
9:15 40000 4 21:15 10000 1
9:30 70000 7 21:30 50000 5
9:45 10000 1 21:45 50000 5
10:00 40000 4 22:00 30000 3
10:15 30000 3 22:15 10000 1
10:30 20000 2 22:30 10000 1
10:45 20000 2 22:45 40000 4
11:00 50000 5 23:00 00000 0
11:15 40000 4 23:15 10000 1
11:30 30000 3 23:30 00000 0
11:45 60000 6 23:45 20000 2
TOTAL 134 0 1 0 0 135 TOTAL 219 5 1 0 0 225
AM PEAK HOUR 8:00 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:15 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 29 AM PEAK VOLUME 36
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 353 5 2 0 0 360
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 98.1% 1.4% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 29 0 0 0 0 29
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 27 1 0 0 0 28
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 9 - Summit Ridge Apartments
437
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS93 DWY north of George.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 20000 2 12:00 12 0 1 0 0 13
0:15 20000 2 12:15 10 1 0 0 0 11
0:30 00000 0 12:30 90000 9
0:45 00000 0 12:45 12 0 0 0 0 12
1:00 10000 1 13:00 21 0 0 0 0 21
1:15 10000 1 13:15 10 1 0 0 0 11
1:30 00000 0 13:30 80000 8
1:45 00000 0 13:45 13 0 0 0 0 13
2:00 30000 3 14:00 13 0 0 0 0 13
2:15 11000 2 14:15 80000 8
2:30 10000 1 14:30 18 0 0 0 0 18
2:45 00000 0 14:45 90000 9
3:00 20000 2 15:00 90000 9
3:15 10000 1 15:15 24 0 0 0 0 24
3:30 00000 0 15:30 19 1000 20
3:45 00000 0 15:45 19 0 0 0 0 19
4:00 10000 1 16:00 13 0 0 0 0 13
4:15 00000 0 16:15 80000 8
4:30 00000 0 16:30 22 0 0 0 0 22
4:45 00000 0 16:45 13 0 0 0 0 13
5:00 30000 3 17:00 15 1 0 0 0 16
5:15 40000 4 17:15 12 0 0 0 0 12
5:30 00000 0 17:30 15 0 0 0 0 15
5:45 10000 1 17:45 18 0 0 0 0 18
6:00 30000 3 18:00 23 0 0 0 0 23
6:15 30000 3 18:15 12 0 0 0 0 12
6:30 20000 2 18:30 10 0 0 0 0 10
6:45 20000 2 18:45 12 0 0 0 0 12
7:00 10000 1 19:00 16 0 0 0 0 16
7:15 60000 6 19:15 13 0 0 0 0 13
7:30 15 0 0 0 0 15 19:30 70000 7
7:45 70000 7 19:45 70000 7
8:00 11 0000 11 20:00 14 0 0 0 0 14
8:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 20:15 70000 7
8:30 16 0 0 0 0 16 20:30 80000 8
8:45 15 0 0 0 0 15 20:45 10 0 0 0 0 10
9:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 21:00 10 0 0 0 0 10
9:15 80000 8 21:15 60000 6
9:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 21:30 20000 2
9:45 50000 5 21:45 60000 6
10:00 40000 4 22:00 70000 7
10:15 50000 5 22:15 50000 5
10:30 20000 2 22:30 20000 2
10:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 22:45 50000 5
11:00 50000 5 23:00 90000 9
11:15 11 1 0 0 0 12 23:15 10000 1
11:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 23:30 10000 1
11:45 50000 5 23:45 40000 4
TOTAL 213 2 0 0 0 215 TOTAL 527 4 1 0 0 532
AM PEAK HOUR 8:00 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:15 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 55 AM PEAK VOLUME 76
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 740 6 1 0 0 747
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 99.1% 0.8% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 55 0 0 0 0 55
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 62 1 0 0 0 63
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 9 - Summit Ridge Apartments
438
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS93 DWY north of George.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 10000 1 12:00 90000 9
0:15 10000 1 12:15 12 0 0 0 0 12
0:30 00000 0 12:30 12 1 1 0 0 14
0:45 30000 3 12:45 20 0 0 0 0 20
1:00 00000 0 13:00 16 0 0 0 0 16
1:15 00000 0 13:15 14 0 0 0 0 14
1:30 00000 0 13:30 17 0 0 0 0 17
1:45 00000 0 13:45 91000 10
2:00 10000 1 14:00 18 0 0 0 0 18
2:15 10000 1 14:15 11 0 0 0 0 11
2:30 11000 2 14:30 10 0 0 0 0 10
2:45 10000 1 14:45 14 0 0 0 0 14
3:00 00000 0 15:00 19 0 0 0 0 19
3:15 00000 0 15:15 15 0 0 0 0 15
3:30 00000 0 15:30 11 0000 11
3:45 00000 0 15:45 90000 9
4:00 00000 0 16:00 17 0 0 0 0 17
4:15 10000 1 16:15 90000 9
4:30 30000 3 16:30 80000 8
4:45 10000 1 16:45 13 0 0 0 0 13
5:00 50000 5 17:00 50000 5
5:15 10000 1 17:15 20 0 0 0 0 20
5:30 60000 6 17:30 13 0 0 0 0 13
5:45 20000 2 17:45 13 0 0 0 0 13
6:00 40000 4 18:00 12 0 0 0 0 12
6:15 60000 6 18:15 10 0 0 0 0 10
6:30 60000 6 18:30 11 0 0 0 0 11
6:45 70000 7 18:45 12 0 0 0 0 12
7:00 90000 9 19:00 10 0 0 0 0 10
7:15 18 0 0 0 0 18 19:15 50000 5
7:30 20 0 0 0 0 20 19:30 80000 8
7:45 31 0 0 0 0 31 19:45 11 0000 11
8:00 25 0 0 0 0 25 20:00 70000 7
8:15 16 0 0 0 0 16 20:15 10 0 0 0 0 10
8:30 15 0 0 0 0 15 20:30 90000 9
8:45 14 0 0 0 0 14 20:45 70000 7
9:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 21:00 50000 5
9:15 15 0 0 0 0 15 21:15 40000 4
9:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 21:30 60000 6
9:45 90000 9 21:45 20000 2
10:00 91000 10 22:00 50000 5
10:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 22:15 40000 4
10:30 70000 7 22:30 40000 4
10:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 22:45 30000 3
11:00 11 0 0 0 0 11 23:00 60000 6
11:15 81000 9 23:15 00000 0
11:30 90000 9 23:30 00000 0
11:45 19 1 0 0 0 20 23:45 30000 3
TOTAL 329 4 0 0 0 333 TOTAL 468 2 1 0 0 471
AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 12:45 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 94 AM PEAK VOLUME 67
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 797 6 1 0 0 804
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 99.1% 0.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 94 0 0 0 0 94
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 51 0 0 0 0 51
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 9 - Summit Ridge Apartments
439
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS87 Dwy north of Thornton.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 00000 0 12:00 30000 3
0:15 00000 0 12:15 21000 3
0:30 30000 3 12:30 31000 4
0:45 20000 2 12:45 20000 2
1:00 10000 1 13:00 30000 3
1:15 00000 0 13:15 40000 4
1:30 00000 0 13:30 30000 3
1:45 00000 0 13:45 30000 3
2:00 00000 0 14:00 50000 5
2:15 00000 0 14:15 80000 8
2:30 00000 0 14:30 60000 6
2:45 20000 2 14:45 20000 2
3:00 10000 1 15:00 50000 5
3:15 00000 0 15:15 50000 5
3:30 00000 0 15:30 90000 9
3:45 00000 0 15:45 30000 3
4:00 00000 0 16:00 90000 9
4:15 00000 0 16:15 90000 9
4:30 00000 0 16:30 50000 5
4:45 20000 2 16:45 70000 7
5:00 00000 0 17:00 60000 6
5:15 00000 0 17:15 20000 2
5:30 10000 1 17:30 90000 9
5:45 00000 0 17:45 90000 9
6:00 00000 0 18:00 12 0000 12
6:15 00000 0 18:15 50000 5
6:30 10000 1 18:30 90000 9
6:45 30000 3 18:45 50000 5
7:00 10000 1 19:00 50000 5
7:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 19:15 30000 3
7:30 20000 2 19:30 80000 8
7:45 10000 1 19:45 30000 3
8:00 30000 3 20:00 70000 7
8:15 40000 4 20:15 50000 5
8:30 50000 5 20:30 80000 8
8:45 21000 3 20:45 20000 2
9:00 10 0000 10 21:00 10000 1
9:15 10000 1 21:15 30000 3
9:30 30000 3 21:30 20000 2
9:45 70000 7 21:45 20000 2
10:00 20000 2 22:00 70000 7
10:15 00000 0 22:15 30000 3
10:30 10000 1 22:30 10000 1
10:45 41000 5 22:45 30000 3
11:00 50000 5 23:00 10000 1
11:15 30000 3 23:15 50000 5
11:30 41000 5 23:30 10000 1
11:45 50000 5 23:45 10000 1
TOTAL 89 3 0 0 0 92 TOTAL 224 2 0 0 0 226
AM PEAK HOUR 8:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 5:45 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 22 AM PEAK VOLUME 35
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 313 5 0 0 0 318
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 98.4% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 16 0 0 0 0 16
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 30 0 0 0 0 30
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 10 - Riverdale Apartments
440
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS87 Dwy north of Thornton.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 00000 0 12:00 30000 3
0:15 00000 0 12:15 60000 6
0:30 20000 2 12:30 01000 1
0:45 10000 1 12:45 50000 5
1:00 10000 1 13:00 30000 3
1:15 00000 0 13:15 50000 5
1:30 10000 1 13:30 10000 1
1:45 10000 1 13:45 50000 5
2:00 00000 0 14:00 50000 5
2:15 00000 0 14:15 60000 6
2:30 00000 0 14:30 70000 7
2:45 10000 1 14:45 40000 4
3:00 00000 0 15:00 60000 6
3:15 00000 0 15:15 20000 2
3:30 10000 1 15:30 11 0000 11
3:45 00000 0 15:45 30000 3
4:00 10000 1 16:00 50000 5
4:15 10000 1 16:15 12 0 0 0 0 12
4:30 00000 0 16:30 50000 5
4:45 00000 0 16:45 70000 7
5:00 10000 1 17:00 50000 5
5:15 00000 0 17:15 60000 6
5:30 10000 1 17:30 10000 1
5:45 10000 1 17:45 40000 4
6:00 10000 1 18:00 70000 7
6:15 30000 3 18:15 70000 7
6:30 60000 6 18:30 70000 7
6:45 30000 3 18:45 40000 4
7:00 13 0 0 0 0 13 19:00 50000 5
7:15 14 0 0 0 0 14 19:15 20000 2
7:30 30000 3 19:30 40000 4
7:45 70000 7 19:45 40000 4
8:00 60000 6 20:00 50000 5
8:15 30000 3 20:15 40000 4
8:30 11 0000 11 20:30 40000 4
8:45 51000 6 20:45 10000 1
9:00 60000 6 21:00 20000 2
9:15 10000 1 21:15 00000 0
9:30 40000 4 21:30 20000 2
9:45 60000 6 21:45 00000 0
10:00 40000 4 22:00 50000 5
10:15 00000 0 22:15 30000 3
10:30 20000 2 22:30 10000 1
10:45 10000 1 22:45 30000 3
11:00 30000 3 23:00 10000 1
11:15 40000 4 23:15 50000 5
11:30 50000 5 23:30 10000 1
11:45 41000 5 23:45 00000 0
TOTAL 128 2 0 0 0 130 TOTAL 194 1 0 0 0 195
AM PEAK HOUR 7:00 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:30 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 37 AM PEAK VOLUME 31
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 322 3 0 0 0 325
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 99.1% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 37 0 0 0 0 37
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 29 0 0 0 0 29
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 10 - Riverdale Apartments
441
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS88 Southern Dwy east of Cawston.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 10000 1 12:00 60000 6
0:15 20000 2 12:15 12 0 0 0 0 12
0:30 30000 3 12:30 90000 9
0:45 10000 1 12:45 30000 3
1:00 10000 1 13:00 40000 4
1:15 20000 2 13:15 13 0 0 0 0 13
1:30 00000 0 13:30 11 0 0 0 0 11
1:45 30000 3 13:45 30000 3
2:00 00000 0 14:00 40000 4
2:15 10000 1 14:15 11 0 0 0 0 11
2:30 00000 0 14:30 80000 8
2:45 10000 1 14:45 11 0 0 0 0 11
3:00 00000 0 15:00 14 0 0 0 0 14
3:15 10000 1 15:15 60000 6
3:30 00000 0 15:30 90000 9
3:45 00000 0 15:45 12 0000 12
4:00 00000 0 16:00 70000 7
4:15 00000 0 16:15 13 0 0 0 0 13
4:30 10000 1 16:30 60000 6
4:45 00000 0 16:45 16 0 0 0 0 16
5:00 50000 5 17:00 16 0 0 0 0 16
5:15 20000 2 17:15 70000 7
5:30 30000 3 17:30 13 0 0 0 0 13
5:45 20000 2 17:45 10 0 0 0 0 10
6:00 10000 1 18:00 60000 6
6:15 00000 0 18:15 10 0 0 0 0 10
6:30 30000 3 18:30 10 0 0 0 0 10
6:45 40000 4 18:45 10 0 0 0 0 10
7:00 12 0 0 0 0 12 19:00 10 0 0 0 0 10
7:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 19:15 70000 7
7:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 19:30 80000 8
7:45 50000 5 19:45 40000 4
8:00 60000 6 20:00 40000 4
8:15 20000 2 20:15 30000 3
8:30 90000 9 20:30 40000 4
8:45 90000 9 20:45 20000 2
9:00 30000 3 21:00 40000 4
9:15 30000 3 21:15 60000 6
9:30 40000 4 21:30 60000 6
9:45 20000 2 21:45 20000 2
10:00 30000 3 22:00 40000 4
10:15 20000 2 22:15 50000 5
10:30 51000 6 22:30 50000 5
10:45 40000 4 22:45 30000 3
11:00 60000 6 23:00 00000 0
11:15 50000 5 23:15 10000 1
11:30 60000 6 23:30 10000 1
11:45 11000 2 23:45 10000 1
TOTAL 145 2 0 0 0 147 TOTAL 340 0 0 0 0 340
AM PEAK HOUR 7:00 AM AM PEAK HOUR 4:45 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 38 AM PEAK VOLUME 52
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 485 2 0 0 0 487
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 99.6% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 38 0 0 0 0 38
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 52 0 0 0 0 52
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 10 - Riverdale Apartments
442
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS88 Southern Dwy east of Cawston.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 10000 1 12:00 40000 4
0:15 10000 1 12:15 80000 8
0:30 20000 2 12:30 72000 9
0:45 20000 2 12:45 70000 7
1:00 00000 0 13:00 80000 8
1:15 10000 1 13:15 90000 9
1:30 00000 0 13:30 13 0 0 0 0 13
1:45 00000 0 13:45 70000 7
2:00 00000 0 14:00 14 0 0 0 0 14
2:15 00000 0 14:15 13 0 0 0 0 13
2:30 00000 0 14:30 40000 4
2:45 00000 0 14:45 60000 6
3:00 00000 0 15:00 60000 6
3:15 00000 0 15:15 80000 8
3:30 00000 0 15:30 90000 9
3:45 30000 3 15:45 11 0000 11
4:00 10000 1 16:00 80000 8
4:15 10000 1 16:15 60000 6
4:30 00000 0 16:30 40000 4
4:45 00000 0 16:45 70000 7
5:00 20000 2 17:00 12 0 0 0 0 12
5:15 10000 1 17:15 60000 6
5:30 20000 2 17:30 11 0 0 0 0 11
5:45 10000 1 17:45 60000 6
6:00 60000 6 18:00 30000 3
6:15 30000 3 18:15 30000 3
6:30 30000 3 18:30 80000 8
6:45 14 0 0 0 0 14 18:45 80000 8
7:00 20 0 0 0 0 20 19:00 40000 4
7:15 18 0 0 0 0 18 19:15 40000 4
7:30 26 0 0 0 0 26 19:30 40000 4
7:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 19:45 30000 3
8:00 60000 6 20:00 50000 5
8:15 50000 5 20:15 50000 5
8:30 80000 8 20:30 50000 5
8:45 80000 8 20:45 30000 3
9:00 50000 5 21:00 50000 5
9:15 20000 2 21:15 50000 5
9:30 50000 5 21:30 40000 4
9:45 60000 6 21:45 20000 2
10:00 50000 5 22:00 10000 1
10:15 00000 0 22:15 20000 2
10:30 30000 3 22:30 40000 4
10:45 71000 8 22:45 10000 1
11:00 81000 9 23:00 00000 0
11:15 50000 5 23:15 70000 7
11:30 40000 4 23:30 10000 1
11:45 51000 6 23:45 10000 1
TOTAL 201 3 0 0 0 204 TOTAL 282 2 0 0 0 284
AM PEAK HOUR 6:45 AM AM PEAK HOUR 1:30 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 78 AM PEAK VOLUME 47
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 483 5 0 0 0 488
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 99.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 75 0 0 0 0 75
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 36 0 0 0 0 36
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 10 - Riverdale Apartments
443
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS89 Northern Dwy east of Cawston.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 20000 2 12:00 40000 4
0:15 00000 0 12:15 30000 3
0:30 00000 0 12:30 30000 3
0:45 10000 1 12:45 10000 1
1:00 00000 0 13:00 50000 5
1:15 00000 0 13:15 10000 1
1:30 10000 1 13:30 40000 4
1:45 00000 0 13:45 40000 4
2:00 10000 1 14:00 71000 8
2:15 00000 0 14:15 50000 5
2:30 00000 0 14:30 40000 4
2:45 00000 0 14:45 40000 4
3:00 00000 0 15:00 40000 4
3:15 00000 0 15:15 50100 6
3:30 00000 0 15:30 30000 3
3:45 00000 0 15:45 20000 2
4:00 20000 2 16:00 70000 7
4:15 50000 5 16:15 60000 6
4:30 00000 0 16:30 80000 8
4:45 00000 0 16:45 10 0000 10
5:00 00000 0 17:00 80000 8
5:15 00000 0 17:15 40000 4
5:30 00000 0 17:30 30000 3
5:45 10000 1 17:45 40000 4
6:00 10000 1 18:00 50000 5
6:15 20000 2 18:15 60000 6
6:30 10000 1 18:30 80000 8
6:45 00000 0 18:45 40000 4
7:00 20000 2 19:00 50000 5
7:15 10000 1 19:15 40000 4
7:30 50000 5 19:30 40000 4
7:45 20000 2 19:45 50000 5
8:00 00000 0 20:00 30000 3
8:15 10000 1 20:15 70000 7
8:30 30000 3 20:30 40000 4
8:45 50000 5 20:45 12 0000 12
9:00 51000 6 21:00 40000 4
9:15 30000 3 21:15 50000 5
9:30 10000 1 21:30 40000 4
9:45 50000 5 21:45 60000 6
10:00 30000 3 22:00 20000 2
10:15 20000 2 22:15 40000 4
10:30 20000 2 22:30 30000 3
10:45 40000 4 22:45 30000 3
11:00 50000 5 23:00 60000 6
11:15 10000 1 23:15 70000 7
11:30 30000 3 23:30 60000 6
11:45 31000 4 23:45 50000 5
TOTAL 73 2 0 0 0 75 TOTAL 231 1 1 0 0 233
AM PEAK HOUR 8:30 AM AM PEAK HOUR 4:15 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 17 AM PEAK VOLUME 32
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 304 3 1 0 0 308
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 98.7% 1.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 10 0 0 0 0 10
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 32 0 0 0 0 32
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 10 - Riverdale Apartments
444
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS89 Northern Dwy east of Cawston.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 00000 0 12:00 60000 6
0:15 00000 0 12:15 90000 9
0:30 30000 3 12:30 60000 6
0:45 10000 1 12:45 40000 4
1:00 00000 0 13:00 50000 5
1:15 00000 0 13:15 40000 4
1:30 00000 0 13:30 50000 5
1:45 00000 0 13:45 40000 4
2:00 00000 0 14:00 30000 3
2:15 00000 0 14:15 80000 8
2:30 00000 0 14:30 60000 6
2:45 20000 2 14:45 50000 5
3:00 10000 1 15:00 60000 6
3:15 00000 0 15:15 90000 9
3:30 30000 3 15:30 50100 6
3:45 00000 0 15:45 70000 7
4:00 00000 0 16:00 20000 2
4:15 40000 4 16:15 60000 6
4:30 00000 0 16:30 60000 6
4:45 10000 1 16:45 50000 5
5:00 00000 0 17:00 60000 6
5:15 00000 0 17:15 30000 3
5:30 20000 2 17:30 40000 4
5:45 20000 2 17:45 30000 3
6:00 50000 5 18:00 60000 6
6:15 30000 3 18:15 50000 5
6:30 20000 2 18:30 30000 3
6:45 50000 5 18:45 30000 3
7:00 70000 7 19:00 60000 6
7:15 70000 7 19:15 20000 2
7:30 50000 5 19:30 20000 2
7:45 20000 2 19:45 30000 3
8:00 40000 4 20:00 30000 3
8:15 30000 3 20:15 10000 1
8:30 60000 6 20:30 10000 1
8:45 40000 4 20:45 20000 2
9:00 20000 2 21:00 10000 1
9:15 20000 2 21:15 50000 5
9:30 30000 3 21:30 20000 2
9:45 80000 8 21:45 20000 2
10:00 10000 1 22:00 10000 1
10:15 30000 3 22:15 10000 1
10:30 20000 2 22:30 30000 3
10:45 30000 3 22:45 20000 2
11:00 20000 2 23:00 10000 1
11:15 20000 2 23:15 00000 0
11:30 30000 3 23:30 10000 1
11:45 11000 2 23:45 00000 0
TOTAL 104 1 0 0 0 105 TOTAL 183 0 1 0 0 184
AM PEAK HOUR 6:45 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:00 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 24 AM PEAK VOLUME 28
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 287 1 1 0 0 289
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 99.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 21 0 0 0 0 21
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 23 0 0 0 0 23
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 10 - Riverdale Apartments
445
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS70 Dwy east of E Parkridge.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 20000 2 12:00 90000 9
0:15 20000 2 12:15 10 0 0 0 0 10
0:30 80000 8 12:30 16 0 0 0 0 16
0:45 20000 2 12:45 13 1 0 0 0 14
1:00 20000 2 13:00 20 2 0 0 0 22
1:15 20000 2 13:15 10 2 0 0 0 12
1:30 10000 1 13:30 18 1 0 0 0 19
1:45 10000 1 13:45 18 0 0 0 0 18
2:00 10000 1 14:00 19 2 0 0 0 21
2:15 10000 1 14:15 21 1 0 0 0 22
2:30 10000 1 14:30 37 1 0 0 0 38
2:45 10000 1 14:45 32 0 0 0 0 32
3:00 40000 4 15:00 15 0 0 0 0 15
3:15 50000 5 15:15 22 2 0 0 0 24
3:30 10000 1 15:30 20 0000 20
3:45 40000 4 15:45 17 0 0 0 0 17
4:00 70000 7 16:00 26 3 0 0 0 29
4:15 00000 0 16:15 21 0 0 0 0 21
4:30 20000 2 16:30 26 0 0 0 0 26
4:45 40000 4 16:45 25 0 0 0 0 25
5:00 30000 3 17:00 23 0 0 0 0 23
5:15 50000 5 17:15 25 0 0 0 0 25
5:30 10000 1 17:30 19 0 0 0 0 19
5:45 50000 5 17:45 30 0 0 0 0 30
6:00 40000 4 18:00 13 0 0 0 0 13
6:15 60000 6 18:15 28 1 0 0 0 29
6:30 32000 5 18:30 14 1 0 0 0 15
6:45 81000 9 18:45 26 0 0 0 0 26
7:00 62000 8 19:00 18 0 0 0 0 18
7:15 73000 10 19:15 90000 9
7:30 20 0 1 0 0 21 19:30 18 0 0 0 0 18
7:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 19:45 20 0000 20
8:00 11 0 1 0 0 12 20:00 14 0 0 0 0 14
8:15 15 1 0 0 0 16 20:15 70000 7
8:30 11 1 0 0 0 12 20:30 18 0 0 0 0 18
8:45 82000 10 20:45 14 0 0 0 0 14
9:00 11 0 0 0 0 11 21:00 90000 9
9:15 50000 5 21:15 15 0 0 0 0 15
9:30 92000 11 21:30 11 0 0 0 0 11
9:45 80000 8 21:45 12 0 0 0 0 12
10:00 13 0 0 0 0 13 22:00 11 0 0 0 0 11
10:15 31000 4 22:15 60000 6
10:30 91000 10 22:30 12 0 0 0 0 12
10:45 15 0 0 0 0 15 22:45 50000 5
11:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 23:00 70000 7
11:15 71000 8 23:15 30000 3
11:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 23:30 60000 6
11:45 80000 8 23:45 20000 2
TOTAL 284 17 2 0 0 303 TOTAL 790 17 0 0 0 807
AM PEAK HOUR 7:30 AM AM PEAK HOUR 2:00 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 60 AM PEAK VOLUME 113
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 1,074 34 2 0 0 1,110
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 96.8% 3.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 57 1 2 0 0 60
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 98 3 0 0 0 101
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 11 - Parkridge Meadows Apartments
446
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS70 Dwy east of E Parkridge.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 20000 2 12:00 80000 8
0:15 30000 3 12:15 12 1 0 0 0 13
0:30 40000 4 12:30 12 0 0 0 0 12
0:45 30000 3 12:45 10 0 0 0 0 10
1:00 20000 2 13:00 16 2 0 0 0 18
1:15 10000 1 13:15 15 2 0 0 0 17
1:30 10000 1 13:30 14 0 0 0 0 14
1:45 00000 0 13:45 18 0 0 0 0 18
2:00 00000 0 14:00 16 3 0 0 0 19
2:15 00000 0 14:15 20 2 0 0 0 22
2:30 10000 1 14:30 17 0 0 0 0 17
2:45 00000 0 14:45 14 0 0 0 0 14
3:00 10000 1 15:00 16 1 0 0 0 17
3:15 00000 0 15:15 29 2 0 0 0 31
3:30 10000 1 15:30 24 0000 24
3:45 20000 2 15:45 21 0 0 0 0 21
4:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 16:00 15 3 0 0 0 18
4:15 14 0 0 0 0 14 16:15 17 0 0 0 0 17
4:30 16 0 0 0 0 16 16:30 12 0 0 0 0 12
4:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 16:45 90000 9
5:00 60000 6 17:00 18 0 0 0 0 18
5:15 19 0 0 0 0 19 17:15 15 0 0 0 0 15
5:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 17:30 15 0 0 0 0 15
5:45 16 0 0 0 0 16 17:45 12 0 0 0 0 12
6:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 18:00 11 0 0 0 0 11
6:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 18:15 12 0 0 0 0 12
6:30 18 0 0 0 0 18 18:30 15 3 0 0 0 18
6:45 28 3 0 0 0 31 18:45 12 0 0 0 0 12
7:00 12 1 0 0 0 13 19:00 14 1 0 0 0 15
7:15 35 4 0 0 0 39 19:15 11 0 0 0 0 11
7:30 26 0 0 0 0 26 19:30 13 0 0 0 0 13
7:45 26 0 1 0 0 27 19:45 70000 7
8:00 23 0000 23 20:00 16 0 0 0 0 16
8:15 10 0 1 0 0 11 20:15 10 0 0 0 0 10
8:30 14 1 0 0 0 15 20:30 19 0 0 0 0 19
8:45 20 3 0 0 0 23 20:45 70000 7
9:00 15 0 0 0 0 15 21:00 70000 7
9:15 16 0 0 0 0 16 21:15 40000 4
9:30 91000 10 21:30 60000 6
9:45 16 1 0 0 0 17 21:45 60000 6
10:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 22:00 10000 1
10:15 17 0 0 0 0 17 22:15 40000 4
10:30 81000 9 22:30 70000 7
10:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 22:45 30000 3
11:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 23:00 80000 8
11:15 50000 5 23:15 00000 0
11:30 12 1 0 0 0 13 23:30 30000 3
11:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 23:45 10000 1
TOTAL 511 16 2 0 0 529 TOTAL 572 20 0 0 0 592
AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:15 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 115 AM PEAK VOLUME 94
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 1,083 36 2 0 0 1,121
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 96.6% 3.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 110 4 1 0 0 115
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 60 0 0 0 0 60
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 11 - Parkridge Meadows Apartments
447
A021323
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS81 Dwy west of Goetz.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 11 0 0 0 0 11 12:00 29 1 0 0 0 30
0:15 70000 7 12:15 34 0 0 0 0 34
0:30 90000 9 12:30 28 0 0 0 0 28
0:45 60000 6 12:45 32 1 0 0 0 33
1:00 30000 3 13:00 20 2 0 0 0 22
1:15 60000 6 13:15 40 2 0 0 0 42
1:30 30000 3 13:30 37 0 0 0 0 37
1:45 70000 7 13:45 29 0 0 0 0 29
2:00 20000 2 14:00 28 0 0 0 0 28
2:15 50000 5 14:15 48 1 0 0 0 49
2:30 50000 5 14:30 45 0 0 0 0 45
2:45 80000 8 14:45 33 1 0 0 0 34
3:00 50000 5 15:00 33 1 0 0 0 34
3:15 20000 2 15:15 51 0 0 0 0 51
3:30 20000 2 15:30 48 0100 49
3:45 80000 8 15:45 62 0 0 0 0 62
4:00 00000 0 16:00 56 1 0 0 0 57
4:15 30000 3 16:15 42 0 0 0 0 42
4:30 10000 1 16:30 49 0 0 0 0 49
4:45 10 0 0 0 0 10 16:45 39 0 0 0 0 39
5:00 50000 5 17:00 59 0 0 0 0 59
5:15 80000 8 17:15 43 0 0 0 0 43
5:30 60000 6 17:30 40 0 0 0 0 40
5:45 50000 5 17:45 50 1 0 0 0 51
6:00 60000 6 18:00 38 1 0 0 0 39
6:15 30000 3 18:15 33 0 0 0 0 33
6:30 80000 8 18:30 44 0 0 0 0 44
6:45 90000 9 18:45 35 1 0 0 0 36
7:00 90000 9 19:00 33 0 0 0 0 33
7:15 14 0 0 0 0 14 19:15 29 0 0 0 0 29
7:30 15 0 0 0 0 15 19:30 27 0 0 0 0 27
7:45 34 0 0 0 0 34 19:45 20 1000 21
8:00 44 1 0 0 0 45 20:00 29 0 0 0 0 29
8:15 47 2 1 0 0 50 20:15 25 0 0 0 0 25
8:30 23 0 0 0 0 23 20:30 33 0 0 0 0 33
8:45 37 0 0 0 0 37 20:45 29 0 0 0 0 29
9:00 14 0 0 0 0 14 21:00 29 0 0 0 0 29
9:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 21:15 21 0 0 0 0 21
9:30 16 0 0 0 0 16 21:30 32 0 0 0 0 32
9:45 10 1 0 0 0 11 21:45 10 0 0 0 0 10
10:00 11 1 0 0 0 12 22:00 15 0 0 0 0 15
10:15 16 2 0 0 0 18 22:15 18 0 0 0 0 18
10:30 19 0 0 0 0 19 22:30 21 0 0 0 0 21
10:45 20 0 0 0 0 20 22:45 19 0 0 0 0 19
11:00 14 1 1 0 0 16 23:00 11 0 0 0 0 11
11:15 20 0 0 0 0 20 23:15 21 0 0 0 0 21
11:30 17 0 0 0 0 17 23:30 10 0 0 0 0 10
11:45 19 0 0 0 0 19 23:45 14 0 0 0 0 14
TOTAL 565 8 2 0 0 575 TOTAL 1,571 14 1 0 0 1,586
AM PEAK HOUR 8:00 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:15 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 155 AM PEAK VOLUME 219
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 2,136 22 3 0 0 2,161
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 98.8% 1.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 151 3 1 0 0 155
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 192 1 0 0 0 193
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS
IN IN

AM PEAK
Study Site 12 - Hunt Club Apartments
448
A13123
DATE: CITY: WRCOG
JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS81 Dwy west of Goetz.

AM PM
TIME 12345 TOTAL Time 12345 TOTAL
0:00 50000 5 12:00 27 1 0 0 0 28
0:15 40000 4 12:15 17 0 0 0 0 17
0:30 60000 6 12:30 42 1 0 0 0 43
0:45 10000 1 12:45 29 1 0 0 0 30
1:00 20000 2 13:00 31 2 0 0 0 33
1:15 50000 5 13:15 24 0 0 0 0 24
1:30 40000 4 13:30 39 3 0 0 0 42
1:45 10000 1 13:45 40 1 0 0 0 41
2:00 20000 2 14:00 53 0 0 0 0 53
2:15 40000 4 14:15 38 0 0 0 0 38
2:30 20000 2 14:30 32 0 0 0 0 32
2:45 40000 4 14:45 25 0 0 0 0 25
3:00 40000 4 15:00 38 1 0 0 0 39
3:15 80000 8 15:15 39 1 0 0 0 40
3:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 15:30 38 0100 39
3:45 15 0 0 0 0 15 15:45 39 0 0 0 0 39
4:00 13 0 0 0 0 13 16:00 28 0 0 0 0 28
4:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 16:15 32 1 0 0 0 33
4:30 23 0 0 0 0 23 16:30 33 0 0 0 0 33
4:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 16:45 23 0 0 0 0 23
5:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 17:00 28 0 0 0 0 28
5:15 18 0 0 0 0 18 17:15 39 0 0 0 0 39
5:30 21 0 0 0 0 21 17:30 31 0 0 0 0 31
5:45 28 0 0 0 0 28 17:45 27 0 0 0 0 27
6:00 14 0 0 0 0 14 18:00 17 0 0 0 0 17
6:15 25 1 0 0 0 26 18:15 24 0 0 0 0 24
6:30 37 0 0 0 0 37 18:30 19 0 0 0 0 19
6:45 30 0 0 0 0 30 18:45 24 0 0 0 0 24
7:00 47 1 0 0 0 48 19:00 20 1 0 0 0 21
7:15 65 0 0 0 0 65 19:15 17 0 0 0 0 17
7:30 72 0 0 0 0 72 19:30 13 0 0 0 0 13
7:45 87 0 0 0 0 87 19:45 17 0000 17
8:00 53 0 0 0 0 53 20:00 10 0 0 0 0 10
8:15 30 1 0 0 0 31 20:15 18 2 0 0 0 20
8:30 16 2 1 0 0 19 20:30 18 0 0 0 0 18
8:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 20:45 16 0 0 0 0 16
9:00 30 0 0 0 0 30 21:00 90000 9
9:15 14 0 0 0 0 14 21:15 80000 8
9:30 23 0 0 0 0 23 21:30 16 0 0 0 0 16
9:45 20 0 0 0 0 20 21:45 80000 8
10:00 25 1 0 0 0 26 22:00 50000 5
10:15 27 0 0 0 0 27 22:15 40000 4
10:30 17 1 0 0 0 18 22:30 11 0 0 0 0 11
10:45 31 0 0 0 0 31 22:45 10 0 0 0 0 10
11:00 24 0 0 0 0 24 23:00 70000 7
11:15 25 1 0 0 0 26 23:15 60000 6
11:30 22 0 0 0 0 22 23:30 20000 2
11:45 16 0 1 0 0 17 23:45 10000 1
TOTAL 987 8 2 0 0 997 TOTAL 1,092 15 1 0 0 1,108
AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 1:30 PM
AM PEAK VOLUME 277 AM PEAK VOLUME 174
CLASS 1 CARS TOTAL: AM+PM 2,079 23 3 0 0 2,105
CLASS 2 2-AXLE TRUCKS % OF TOTAL 98.8% 1.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% CLASS 3 3-AXLE TRUCKS 277 0 0 0 0 277
CLASS 4 4-AXLE TRUCKS 125 0 0 0 0 125
CLASS 5 5-AXLE + TRUCKS

PM PEAK
24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION)
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 [email protected]

THREE DAYS

OUT OUT

AM PEAK
Study Site 12 - Hunt Club Apartments
449
Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG
May 2, 2023

Appendix B: Apartment
Characteristics
450
Appendix B: Apartment Characteristics
Studio
One
Bedroom
Two
Bedrooms
Three
Bedrooms
Four
Bedrooms
Total # of
DUs
Total # of
Bedrooms
Average #
Bedrooms
per DU
Studio
One
Bedroom
Two
Bedrooms
Three
Bedrooms
Four
Bedrooms
Average
Size of
Unit per
Complex
Sum of
Area of All
Dus
Average
Square
Footage
per DU
(Sq. Ft.)
1 Central Zone Oakwood Apartments
15170 Perris Blvd,
Moreno Valley, CA
92551
+1 951-243-0800 N/A - - 80 93 68 241 711 3.0 - - 832 1,042 1,282 1,052 250,642 1040.01 2 Northwest Zone Springbrook Park
Apartments
1066 Orange St,
Riverside, CA 92501 +1 951-682-9774 N/A - 40 32 40 - 112 224 2.0 - 800 967 1,100 - 956 106,944 954.86 3 Central Zone Vista Springs
Apartments
21550 Box Springs Rd,
Moreno Valley, CA
92557
+1 951-276-0334 N/A - 108 104 - - 212 316 1.5 - 690 960 - - 825 174,360 822.45 4 Northwest Zone Vesada Apartment
Homes
3390 Country Village
Road, Riverside, CA
92509
+1 951-462-2198 california.weidner.com 18 72 153 18 - 261 450 1.7 629 782 1,021 1,168 - 900 244,863 938.17 5 Southwest Zone Morning Ridge
Apartments
30660 Milky Way Dr,
Temecula, CA 92592 +1 951-699-0886 morningridgeapts.com - 74 126 - - 200 326 1.6 680 950 - - 815 170,020 850.10 6 Northwest Zone Stonegate Apartments 6506 Doolittle Ave, Riverside, CA 92503 (951) 351-9445 stonegateriverside.com 1 79 80 - - 160 240 1.5 300 705 905 - - 637 128,395 802.47 7 Southwest Zone River's Edge Apartment
Homes
2088 E Lakeshore Dr,
Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
+1 951-678-8553 riversedgeapartmentlivi
ng.com
- 96 88 - - 184 272 1.5 - 762 1,089 - - 926 168,984 918.39 8 Hemet/San Jacinto
Zone
Mayberry Colony
Apartments
40389 Mayberry Ave #
A1, Hemet, CA 92544
+1 951-929-3380 www.mayberrycolony.co
m - 34 55 - - 89 144 1.6 - 790 962 - - 876 79,770 896.29 9 Pass Zone Summit Ridge
Apartments
555 N Hathaway St #
1101, Banning, CA
92220
+1 951-849-3001 www.summitridgebanni
ng.com - - 40 40 - 80 200 2.5 - 850 1,058 - - 954 42,320 529.00 10 Hemet/San Jacinto
Zone Riverdale Apartments 1250 S Cawston Ave, Hemet, CA 92545 +1 951-766-5672 www.rentriverdaleapts.c
om - - 36 60 - 96 252 2.6 - - 984 1,033 - 1,009 97,404 1014.63 11 Northwest Zone Parkridge Meadows
Apartments
219 E Parkridge Ave,
Corona, CA 92879 +1 951-736-8681 www.allenproperties.net - - 87 1 - 88 177 2.0 - - 780 - - 780 67,860 771.14 12 Central Zone Hunt Club Apartments 1355 S Perris Blvd, Perris, CA 92570
+1 951-657-0228 www.huntclubperris.co
m - - 203 - - 203 406 2.0 - - 962 - - 962 195,286 962.00 Name Study Site
#
TUMF Zone Address Phone # Apartment Website
# of Apartment Style Apartment Size (Sq. Ft.)
&---------------- 451
Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG
May 2, 2023

Appendix C: Correlation Plots
452
Appendix C: Correlation Plots
Daily Trip Generation by # of Dwelling Units in Complex Daily Trip Generation by Average Size of Dwelling Unit Daily Trip Generation by Average # of Bedrooms Per Dwelling Unit
AM Peak Trip Generation by # of Dwelling Units in Complex PM Peak Trip Generation by # of Dwelling Units in Complex AM Peak Trip Generation by Average # of Bedrooms Per
Dwelling Unit
PM Peak Trip Generation by Average # of Bedrooms Per Dwelling Unit
AM Peak Trip Generation by Average Size of Dwelling Unit PM Peak Trip Generation by Average Size of Dwelling Unit y = 249.92x + 601.26
R² = 0.0813
0 500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Daily Trips Generated (Veh)
Average # of Bedrooms per DU
Average # of Bedrooms per DU
y = 20.854x + 50.612
R² = 0.0758
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
180

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
AM Peak Trips Generated (Veh)
Average # of Bedrooms per DU
Average # of Bedrooms per DU
y = 19.26x + 50.489
R² = 0.0769
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
180

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
PM Peak Trips Generated (Veh)
Average # of Bedrooms per DU
Average # of Bedrooms per DU
y = 1.4463x ‐ 174.18
R² = 0.2107
0 500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200
Daily Trips Generated (Veh)
Average DU Size (Sq. Ft.)
Average DU Size (Sq. Ft.)
y = 0.1258x ‐ 18.538
R² = 0.2131
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
180
0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200
AM Peak Trips Generated (Veh)
Average DU Size (Sq. Ft.)
Average DU Size (Sq. Ft.)
y = 0.1319x ‐ 27.14
R² = 0.2789
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
180
0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200
PM Peak Trips Generated (Veh)
Average DU Size (Sq. Ft.)
Average DU Size (Sq. Ft.)
y = 5.7897x + 162
R² = 0.7617
0 500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Daily Trips Generated (Veh)
Total # of Dwelling Units
Total # of Dwelling Units
y = 0.4893x + 12.967
R² = 0.7277
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
180
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
AM Peak Trips Generated (Veh)
Total # of Dwelling Units
Total # of Dwelling Units
y = 0.4552x + 15.198
R² = 0.7495
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
180
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
PM Peak Trips Generated (Veh)
Total # of Dwelling Units
Total # of Dwelling Units
•
• +
,.'v 4-;'~:-';• + +
t
+
t
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
•
• 1 .. ! ... •·····;·························· +
: .. • + +
•
. • . .............. .
~ ... •·········!··········· . : .. • t
•
•
;..~·········~·············~·········
• •
• • •
,-
+
t
t
t
t
t
+
t
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
t
+
t
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
t •
•
t t
•
•
'. ---:·::<:"
453
WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 L-1
Appendix L - Non-Residential Fee Calculation
The non-residential fee was calculated by multiplying the estimated Regional System of Highways and Arterials improvements cost attributable to new development (Section

4.0) by the proportion of all regional trips that are generated by non-residential land uses (Section 5.3), and dividing this number by the projected increase in non-residential land use between 2018 and 2045 (Table 2.3, Section 2.0) and the proportional share of new employees in each sector.

In preparation for the fee calculation, SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS employment data by sector was first converted to land use as square feet of gross floor area (SF GFA). Nonresidential employee to gross floor area conversion factors were derived from four sources. These sources are:
 Cordoba Corporation/Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc. (PBQD), Land Use Density Conversion Factors For The Long-Range Corridor Study San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, August 20, 1990. Table 8.  Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Orange County Subarea Modeling Guidelines Manual, June 2001. Appendix C.
 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), Employment Density Study, October 31, 2001, Table IIB
 County of Riverside, General Plan, As Amended December 15, 2015, Appendix E:

Socioeconomic Build-Out Projections Assumptions & Methodology, Table E-5

The employment conversion factors developed for use in the calculation of the nonresidential fee are tabulated in Exhibits L-1 through L-4. The relevant sections of these respective publications are included in this Appendix as Exhibits L-5 through L-8.

To account for the difference in trip generation rates between the various employment sectors, the non-residential fee value for each sector was normalized by multiplying by the respective median trip generation rate for the range of associated land use types as published in the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition, 2021. The respective fee values are presented in Section 6.2. The table detailing the calculation of the non-residential fee (and residential fee) is included in Appendix K as Exhibit K-1.
454
EXHIBIT L-1 Employment Conversion Factors
Employment Sector Employees Gross Floor Area (TSF) Conversion Rate (Employees/TSF)
Land Use Category
(2)
Minimum Range
Conversion Rate
(Employees/TSF)
Land Use Category
(3)
SF per Employee
based on Average
Employees per Acre
and Average FAR
(Riverside County)
Employees/TSF Land Use Category (4) SF per Employee Employees/TSF TUMF Median
Employment
Conversion Factors
(Employees/TSF)
6,379 5,117 1.25 R&D/LI/BP 2.50 R&D/Flex Space 867 Light Industrial 1030 11,603 6,103 1.90 Heavy Industry 2.00 Light Manufacturing 1548 Heavy Industry 1500 8,624 3,962 2.18 Warehouse 1.00 Warehouse 1195
5,559 3,038 1.83
954 411 2.32
6,120 4,140 1.48
119 279 0.43
1,023 917 1.12

1.65 Median 2.00 Median 1195.0 0.84 Median 1265.0 0.79
34,821 20,125 1.73 Regional Retail 268 Commercial Retail 500 3,452 1,590 2.17 Other Retail/Service 629
1,080 453 2.38
12,978 17,023 0.76

1.95 Median 448.5 2.23 Median 500.0 2.00
7,738 1,095 7.07 Office 3.00 Low-Rise Office 481 Commercial Office 300 3,945 548 7.20 Medical/PO/Bank 3.50 Hotel/Motel 3476 Business Park 600 5,470 1,529 3.58 Hospital 2.50
6,680 1,966 3.40 Restaurant 3.00
8,900 3,886 2.29
9,006 3,201 2.81
23,345 4,061 5.75

3.58 Median 3.00 Median 1978.5 0.51 Median 450.0 2.22
Government/Civic 3.00 Government Offices 208
Library 1.50
Median 2.25 Median 208.0 4.81
Notes:

3.53 General Offices

2.61 (3) SCAG, Employment Density Study, October 31, 2001, Table IIB Service
(2) OCTA, Orange County Subarea Model Guidelines Manual, June 2001. Appendix C. (1) Cordoba Corporation/PBQD, Land Use Density Conversion Factors For Long Range Corridor Study San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, August 20, 1990. Table 8. - TUMF Median Employment Conversion Factor is the median of (1) through (4) Conversion Rates - OCTA Typical Employment Conversion Factors for Commercial excluded as it potentially covers uses in both Retail and Service categories; Hotel/Motel, Schools, Golf Course, Developed Park, Park and Agricultural were excluded as they are calculated from units other than TSF.

Government/Public Sector
Professional Services
Medical Services
Median
(4) County of Riverside, General Plan, As Amended December 15, 2015, Appendix E: Socioeconomic Build-Out Projections Assumptions & Methodology, Table E-5 Retail

1.25 2.00
Equipment Rental
Retail Trade
Median
Personnal, Rental and Repair
General Commercial
Light Manufacturing
Manufacturing, Small Module
Wholesale, Trade Industry
- Business by Land Use Categories Wholesale Trade Commercial and Automotive Repair were excluded as there is inconsistencies between the Land Use Density Conversion Factors For Long Range Corridor Study San Bernardino and Riverside Counties categorization, and the NAICS Major Group categorization.

Business by Land Use Category (1)
Industrial High Tech/Research
Median
Heavy Manufacturing
General Manufacturing
Warehousing
General Industry
Financial/Insurance/Real Estate
Small Office
Restaurant
Business Services
455
EXHIBIT L-2 Population and Employment Estimates
Sector 2018 2045 Change Employee Conversion
Factor / TSF Change in SF of GFA
Population 1,905,440 2,533,876 628,436
Households
Single-Family 397,407 564,898 167,491
Multi-Family 157,166 247,501 90,335
Totals 554,573 812,399 257,826
Employees
Industrial 169,334 245,915 76,581 1.25 61,489,565
Retail 73,814 86,929 13,115 2.00 6,557,500
Service 308,703 482,958 174,255 2.61 66,735,957
Government/Public Sector 18,569 30,640 12,071 3.53 3,420,665 Totals 570,420 846,442 276,022 138,203,688
Source: SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS; RivCOM
456
EXHIBIT L-3 Trip Generation Rate Comparison
Non-Residential
Employee Growth SF Growth
ITE Median PM
Peak Hour Trips
Per Employee
ITE Median PM Peak
Hour Trips per TSF
Trip Growth
(SFGrowth *
ITEMedian)
Calculated PM
Peak Hour Trips per
Employee
Weighted Median
PM Peak Hour Trips
Per Employee
Median Share PM
Peak Period Pass By
Trips (Retail and
Service Uses)
Adjusted PM Peak
Hour Trips Per
Employee
Industrial 76,581 61,489,565 0.7 0.6 36,894 0.5 0.6 0.6 Retail 13,115 6,557,500 3.3 5.0 32,788 2.5 2.9 37% 1.8
Service 174,255 66,735,957 2.2 5.7 380,395 2.2 2.2 44% 1.2 Government/Public Sector 12,071 3,420,665 3.3 3.2 10,946 0.9 2.1 2.1 276,022 138,203,688 461,022
457
EXHIBIT L-4 Representative ITE Weekday PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Rates

RESIDENTIAL
PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use Category ITE Reference Trip Ends per DU Trip Ends per Residents Single Family Residential
Single Family Detached Housing 210 0.99 0.28
Multi Family
Single-Family Attached Housing 215 0.61 0.44
Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) Not Close to Rail Transit 220 0.57 0.27 Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) Not Close to Rail Transit 221 0.39 0.23 Multifamily Housing (High-Rise) Not Close to Rail Transit 222 0.40 Affordable Housing - Income Limits 223 0.50 0.14
Average 0.49 0.27
Median 0.50 0.25

NON-RESIDENTIAL
PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Period
Land Use Category ITE Reference Trip Ends per TSF* Trip Ends per Employee*Pass by Trips** Industrial
Intermodal Truck Terminal 30 1.89 0.72
General Light Industry 110 0.80 0.69
Industrial Park 130 0.40 0.42
Manufacturing 140 0.80 0.40
Warehousing 150 0.23 0.68
High-Cube Transload and Short-Term Storage 154 0.17
High-Cube Fulfillment Center Warehouse - Non-Sort 155 0.27 High-Cube Parcel Hib Warehouse 156 0.71
Average 0.66 0.58
Median 0.56 0.68
Retail
Building Materials and Lumber 812 2.65 3.30
Free-Standing Discount Superstore 813 4.39 1.75 29%
Variety Store 814 7.42 12.65 34%
Free-Standing Discount Store 815 5.42 2.36 20%
Hardware/Paint Store 816 1.10 3.77 26%
Nursery (Garden Center) 817 8.37 2.55
Nursery (Wholesale) 818 5.01 0.59
Shopping Center 820 4.09 1.91
Shopping Center (150K to 300K) 820 29%
Shopping Center (300K to 900 K) 820 19%
Shopping Plaza with Supermarket 821 9.72
Shopping Plaza without Supermarket 821 5.40 1.80
Shopping Plaza 821 40%
Strip Retail Plaza 822 13.24 10.15
Factory Outlet Center 823 1.94
Automobile Sales (New) 840 2.65 1.10
Automobile Sales (Used) 841 4.92 2.27
Automobile Parts Sales 843 5.88 4.27 43%
Tire Store 848 3.72 3.05 25%
Supermarket 850 9.19 3.37 24%
Convenience Store 851 53.51 34.33
Convenience Market with Gasoline Pumps 853
Discount Supermarket 854
Discount Club 857 4.62 3.49 34%
Sporting Goods Superstore 861 2.58 0.93
Home Improvement Superstore 862 3.21 42%
Electronics Superstore 863 4.48 40%
Pet Supply Superstore 866 2.19
Book Superstore 868 14.00
Department Store 875 2.81
Apparel Store 876 4.20
Pharmacy/Drugstore without Drive Through Window 880 8.62 53% Pharmacy/Drugstore with Drive Through Window 881 11.23 7.79 49% Marijuana Dispensary 882 24.57
Furniture Store 890 0.70 1.01 53%
Liquor Store 899 17.00 5.98
Gasoline/Service Station 944 28.39 57%
Convenience Store/Gas Station (none) 945 21.31
Convenience Store/Gas Station (9 - 15 vehicle fueling positions) 945 56.38 75% Average 9.54 6.87 38%
Median 4.97 3.30 37%
Service
Data Center 160 0.13
Specialty Trade Contractor 180 2.18 0.80
Movie Theatre 445 14.06 9.56
Health/Fitness Club 492 3.92
Day Care Center 565 11.82 4.66 44%
Hospital 610 0.98 0.33
Nursing Home 620 0.82 0.45
Clinic 630 4.22 2.49
Animal Hospital/Veterinary Clinic 640 3.83 2.26
Free Standing Emergency Room 650 2.24
Small Office Building 712 3.15 1.90
Medical-Dentist Office Building (Stand-Alone) 720 4.79 1.26 Medical-Dentist Office Building (Within/Near Hospital Campus) 720 3.78 1.03 Walk-in Bank 911 26.40 6.18
Drive-in Bank 912 20.92 4.36 35%
Hair Salon 918 1.94
Copy, Print and Express Ship Store 920 12.30 6.63
Fast Casual Restaurant 930 18.57
Fine Dining Restaurant 931 8.28 1.79 44%
High Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant 932 16.35 3.66 43%
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Through 934 50.94 5.45 55% Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Through No Seating 935 31% Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive Through 937 43.65
Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive Through No Seating 938 98% Quick Lube Vehicle Shop 941 9.42 2.17
Automobile Care Center 942 3.51 1.43
Automobile Parts and Service Center 943 2.61 1.80
Wine Tasting Room 970 6.60
Brewery Tap Room 971 10.93
Drinking Place 975 15.53
Average 10.85 3.06 50%
Median 5.70 2.17 44%
Government/Public Sector
Recreational Community Center 495 2.53 2.71
Elementary School 520 4.60
Middle/Junior High School 522 4.83
High School 525 3.32
School District Office 528 2.37 0.84
Private School (K-8) 530 5.72
Private School (K-12) 532 2.82
Private High School 534 2.49
Charter Elementary School 536 10.64
Charter School (K-12) 538 10.66
Junior/Community College 540 1.63
University/College 550 0.81
Adult Detention Facility 571 0.94 0.51
Library 590 8.53 6.81
Government Office Building 730 3.19 0.91
State Motor Vehicles Department 731 7.68 4.27
Post Office 732 15.11 3.29
Average 5.76 3.93
Median 3.19 3.29
Notes:
* - Average weekday PM peak hour of generator trip end data derived from ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition), September 2021 ** - Average weekday PM peak pass-by trip rates derived from ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition), September 2021 458
WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 EXHIBIT L-5
Land Use Density Conversion Factors for the Long-Range Corridor Study San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, Table 8
Cordoba Corporation/Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc. (PBQD), August 20, 1990.
459
460
WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 EXHIBIT L-6
Orange County Subarea Modeling Guidelines Manual, Appendix C Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA)
June 2001
461
462
WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 EXHIBIT L-7
Employment Density Study, Table IIB
Southern California, October 31, 2001
463
THE NATELSON COMPANY, INC.

Summary Report - Page 4
Employment Density Study
Table II-A
Derivation of Square Feet per Employee Based on:
--MEDIAN EMPLOYEES PER ACRE
--MEDIAN FAR
Land Use Category
Los
Angeles Orange Riverside
San
Bernardino Ventura Imperial Region
Regional Retail -- 2,322 165 1,392 990 -- 1,023
Other Retail/Svc. 730 450 1,148 432 412 796 585
Low-Rise Office 471 352 598 1,014 659 415 466
High-Rise Office 377 235 -- -- -- -- 300
Hotel/Motel 1,179 -- 5,273 1,747 -- 808 1,804
R & D/Flex Space 1,717 511 1,121 1,833 277 -- 527
Light Manufacturing 1,214 786 2,221 1,538 202 2,230 924 Heavy Manufacuring -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Warehouse 1,518 1,350 819 2,111 149 3,257 1,225
Government Offices 2,182 408 1,475 851 120 407 672
Table II-B
Derivation of Square Feet per Employee Based on:
--AVERAGE EMPLOYEES PER ACRE
--AVERAGE FAR
Land Use Category
Los
Angeles Orange Riverside
San
Bernardino Ventura Imperial Region
Regional Retail -- 704 268 1,009 1,165 -- 857
Other Retail/Svc. 424 325 629 124 271 255 344
Low-Rise Office 319 287 481 697 389 632 288
High-Rise Office 440 218 -- -- -- -- 311
Hotel/Motel -- -- 3,476 2,544 -- 311 1,152
R & D/Flex Space 1,796 466 867 834 269 -- 344
Light Manufacturing 829 558 1,548 705 189 994 439
Heavy Manufacuring -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Warehouse 1,518 979 581 1,195 131 450 814
Government Offices 1,442 206 208 188 94 322 261
Notes:
"--" = Data not available.

Square Feet per Employee
Square Feet per Employee

464
WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee
TUMF Nexus Study – 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 EXHIBIT L-8
General Plan, As Amended December 15, 2015.

Appendix E: Socioeconomic Build-Out Projections Assumptions & Methodology, Table E-5
County of Riverside, 2015
465
County of Riverside General Plan
Socioeconomic Build-out Assumptions and Methodology
Appendix E-1 Page 3
December 8, 2015 County of Riverside General Plan
Table E-3: Net Parcel Acre Factors
Land Use Designation Net Parcel Area
Commercial Retail (CR) 0.75
Commercial Tourist (CT) 0.75
Commercial Office (CO) 0.75
Light Industrial (LI) 0.80
Heavy Industrial (HI) 0.75
Business Park (BP) 0.75
Net Parcel Square Feet: To convert net acres to net square feet, net acres are multiplied by 43,560 feet per acre.

For example, 50 net acres of Commercial Office (66.66 gross acres) equals 2,178,000 net square feet.

Floor Area Ratio (FAR): Floor Area Ratio, or FAR, indicates the ratio of gross building square footage permitted on a parcel to net square footage of the parcel. FAR's for Commercial, Industrial and Business Park land uses are identified, in Table E-4, below. See General Plan Glossary for full definition of FAR.

Table E-4: Development FAR Factors
Land Use Designation
FAR
Minimum Probable* Maximum
Commercial Retail (CR) 0.20 0.23 0.35
Commercial Tourist (CT) 0.20 0.25 0.35
Commercial Office (CO) 0.25 0.35 1.00
Light Industrial (LI) 0.25 0.38 0.60
Heavy Industrial (HI) 0.15 0.40 0.50
Business Park (BP) 0.25 0.30 0.60
*Factor used for theoretical planning estimates.

Building Square Footage: Building square footage for the land use designations listed in the table above are calculated by multiplying the Net Square Feet of each land use designation by the corresponding FAR. For instance, 20,000 square feet of Commercial Retail with an FAR of 0.23 would yield 4,600 square feet of building space.

Square Feet (SF)/Employee Factor: This factor indicates the number of employees typically associated with a given amount of square feet of building space per employee. It is used to estimate the number of jobs resulting for a given land use designation. These factors for the commercial land use designations are listed in Table E-5 below.

Table E-5: Commercial Employment Factors
Land Use Designation SF/Employee
Commercial Retail (CR)* 500
Commercial Tourist (CT) 500
Commercial Office (CO) 300
Light Industrial (LI) 1,030
Heavy Industrial (HI) 1,500
Business Park (BP) 600
*It is assumed that CR designated lands will build out at 40% CR and 60% MDR.

Employment: Employment for commercial, industrial, and business park land uses is calculated by dividing the total number of building square feet by the SF/Employee factor. For example, 300,000 square feet of commercial office building space would yield 1,000 employees.
466

AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Record Gazette
218 N. Murray St., Banning, CA 92220
Proof of Publication
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
2024 11 25_Banning-PHN Ord Sum TUMF
___________________________________________________
State of California          )
County of Riverside   )  SS.

I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of Record Gazette, a newspaper published in the English language in the City of Banning, County of Riverside, and adjudicated a newspaper of
general circulation as defined by the laws of the state of California by the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, under the date October 14, 1966, Case No. 54737.

That the notice, of which the annexed is a copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:

Nov 29, 2024,Dec 6, 2024
Executed on: ____________________
At City of Banning, California
I ceritfy (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
___________________________________________________
Signature
2024 11 25_Banning-PHN Ord Sum TUMF | Page 1 of 2
December 6, 2024
467
2024 11 25_Banning-PHN Ord Sum TUMF | Page 2 of 2
468

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Douglas Schulze, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Yvette Vaca, Administrative Sergeant
Vincent Avila, Chief of Police
MEETING DATE: January 14, 2025
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution 2025-01, Approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Between The City of Banning Police Department and The Riverside County Probation Department Post-Release Accountability and Compliance Team (PACT) for FY 2024-2025 RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2025-01.

BACKGROUND:

The Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 (Realignment) implementation resulted in specified convicted felons and parolees who were previously monitored by State Parole to be supervised by the Riverside County Probation Department (hereinafter Probation). On August 30, 2011, the Community Corrections Partnership Executive Committee (CCPEC) of Riverside County (County) voted unanimously for the need of a county-wide law enforcement component.

The eleven city police chiefs, the Riverside County Sheriff, the Riverside County District Attorney and Probation have built the infrastructure to support this type of critical enforcement. The PACT is a countywide, multi-jurisdictional team composed of Probation, the Banning Police Department, Beaumont Police Department, Blythe Police Department, Cathedral City Police Department, Corona Police Department, Desert Hot Springs Police Department, Hemet Police Department, Indio Police Department, Menifee Police Department, Murrieta Police Department, Riverside Police Department, Riverside County District Attorney, and the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department representing the seventeen Sheriff’s contract cities within the County.

The primary mission of PACT is to work with Probation to focus on “high-risk” and “at-large” realignment offenders that pose the most risk to public safety. PACT is dedicated to:

Identifying and investigating “non-compliant” realignment offenders, locating and apprehending “at-large” and “high-risk” realignment offenders, and performing probation compliance sweeps.

Through sustained, proactive, and coordinated investigations, PACT will be able to share information, serve warrants, locate and apprehend violators, and reduce the number of realignment offenders who abscond. The support of the PACT allows Probation more time and resources to focus on case management, addressing treatment needs, and ensuring compliance with court-ordered conditions.

This MOU shall be effective upon execution by signature of the Chief Probation Officer of Riverside County and the Chiefs or City Managers of each participating PACT agency or their respective 469
designees. The original term of this MOU commenced on July 1, 2023, and is now in its second year, continuing through June 30, 2025. Thereafter this MOU will automatically renew, annually, for each fiscal year from July 1st to June 30th and shall remain in effect until June 30, 2028, unless terminated or modified as defined in section 5.0 of the MOU.

JUSTIFICATION:

The acceptance of the PACT MOU increases the resources available to the City of Banning, which creates a safer environment for all residents and visitors to the city.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The acceptance of the PACT MOU allows the City of Banning to authorize two, fully funded Sworn Peace Officers, at an allocation of $238,150.00 per officer, totaling $476,30.00 annually, towards the salary, benefits, and equipment of the officers assigned to the team.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may choose to reject staff’s recommendation and provide alternative direction.

BUDGETED?:

Yes
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT:

Yes
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 2025-01, PACT MOU.docx

2. AB 109 PACT FY 24 25 MOU City Signatures.pdf

3. Banning City Manager Signature 24.25.pdf
470
Resolution 2025-01

RESOLUTION 2025-01

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE FY 2024-2025 MEMORANDUM OF

UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE CITY OF BANNING POLICE DEPARTMENT AND

THE POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM (PACT) WHEREAS, the City of Banning Police Department desires to undertake a Memorandum of Understanding (hereafter referred to as MOU) between the City of Banning Police Department and the Riverside County Probation Department (hereafter referred to as Probation) Post-Release Accountability and Compliance Team (hereafter referred to as PACT); WHEREAS, any liability arising out of the performance of this MOU, including civil court actions for damages, shall be the responsibility of the participating agency and the authorizing agency, according to article 10.0 of the MOU;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement, the Banning Police Department is authorized two PACT positions, funded at $238,150.00 each, totaling $476,300.00 in funds; WHEREAS, the City of Banning Police Department will provide two officers to fill the fully funded PACT positions;
WHEREAS, AB109 PACT funds may be used towards the actual cost of all salary, benefits, paid leave, and overtime paid to any agency employees for work while assigned and working for PACT, mileage for travel using an agency vehicle for travel to, from and during PACT activities, and any equipment as needed for each PACT Officer. PACT funds may also be used to supplement Finance Department and Police Department administrative time related to fulfilling invoicing and purchasing requirements and responsibilities.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council approves acceptance of the FY 2024-2025 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Banning Police Department and the Post-Release Accountability and Compliance Team (PACT).

SECTION 2. The City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute on behalf of the City Council of the City of Banning the attached MOU.

SECTION 3. The City Council authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to make necessary budget adjustments, appropriations, and transfers related to this resolution.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of January 2025.

Sheri Flynn, Mayor
City of Banning
471
Resolution 2025-01

ATTEST:

Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk
City of Banning
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

John Pinkney, City Attorney
472
Resolution 2025-01

CERTIFICATION:

I, Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2025-01, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 14th day of January 2025 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk
City of Banning, California
473
Resolution 2025-01

EXHIBIT A
Memorandum of Understanding with PACT
474

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND PARTICIPATING

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM (PACT)

LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
FY 2024-2025
475

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 Background............................................................................................................ 3

2.0 Parties and Purpose................................................................................................ 3

3.0 Probation Officer Role ............................................................................................ 4

4.0 Term ...................................................................................................................... 4

5.0 Amendment or Termination of MOU ...................................................................... 4

6.0 Audits.................................................................................................................... 5

7.0 Records Retention.................................................................................................. 5

8.0 Financial Reports.................................................................................................... 6

9.0 Confidentiality........................................................................................................ 6

10.0 Hold Harmless and Indemnification ........................................................................ 6

11.0 Assignment ............................................................................................................ 6

12.0 License and Certifications ....................................................................................... 7

13.0 Compliance, Governing Law, and Severability ......................................................... 7

14.0 Compensation ........................................................................................................ 7

14.1 Maximum Amount ................................................................................................7

14.2 Method, Time, and Schedule/Condition of Payments..........................................7

14.3 Use of Funds..........................................................................................................8

14.4 Disallowance..........................................................................................................9

14.5 Availability of Funding...........................................................................................9

15.0 Notices................................................................................................................... 9

16.0 Merger Clause .......................................................................................................10

17.0 Electronic Signatures.............................................................................................10 SIGNATURE PAGES ..........................................................................................................11 Exhibit A: Quarterly Financial Summary Report Template ................................................24 Exhibit B: PACT Invoice Template ....................................................................................25 Exhibit C: Distribution of Annual PACT Allocation by City .................................................26 Exhibit D: PACT Frequently Asked Questions....................................................................27 Exhibit E: Funding & Reimbursement Policy & Guidelines for Regional PAC Teams...........30 476

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 3

1.0 BACKGROUND
The Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 (Realignment) implementation resulted in specified convicted felons and parolees who were previously monitored by State Parole to be supervised by the Riverside County Probation Department (hereinafter Probation). On August 30, 2011, the Community Corrections Partnership Executive Committee (CCPEC) of Riverside County (County) voted unanimously for the need of a county-wide law enforcement component.

The eleven (11) city police chiefs, the Riverside County Sheriff, the Riverside County District Attorney and Probation have built the infrastructure to support this type of critical enforcement. The Post-release Accountability and Compliance Team (hereinafter PACT) is a county-wide, multi-jurisdictional team composed of Probation, the Banning Police Department, Beaumont Police Department, Blythe Police Department, Cathedral City Police Department, Corona Police Department, Desert Hot Springs Police Department, Hemet Police Department, Indio Police Department, Menifee Police Department, Murrieta Police Department, Riverside Police Department, Riverside County District Attorney, and the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department representing the seventeen Sheriff’s contract cities within the County.

The primary mission of PACT isto work with Probation to focus on “high-risk” and “at-large” realignment offenders that pose the most risk to public safety. PACT is dedicated to:
• Identifying and investigating “non-compliant” realignment offenders, • Locating and apprehending “at-large” and “high-risk” realignment offenders, and • Performing probation compliance sweeps.

Through sustained, proactive and coordinated investigations, PACT will be able to share information, serve warrants, locate and apprehend violators, and reduce the number of realignment offenders who abscond. The support of the PACT allows Probation more time and resources to focus on case management, addressing treatment needs, and ensuring compliance with Court-ordered conditions.

2.0 PARTIES AND PURPOSE
This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is entered into by and between Probation, the Banning Police Department, Beaumont Police Department, Blythe Police Department, Cathedral City Police Department, Corona Police Department, Desert Hot Springs Police 477

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 4
Department, Hemet Police Department, Indio Police Department, Menifee Police Department, Murrieta Police Department, Riverside Police Department, Riverside County Sheriff’s Department Coachella, Lake Elsinore and San Jacinto stations for monetary reimbursement from realignment funds for expenses related to their participation in PACT.

The police chief of the Murrieta Police Department is the voting member of the CCPEC and represents the PACT local law enforcement agencies participating in this MOU, including for receipt of notices under section 15.

The parties agree to the terms and conditions of this MOU, which will be effective immediately and remain in effect until terminated or modified as defined in section 4.0 of this MOU.

3.0 PROBATION OFFICER ROLE:

Probation Officers are peace officers under Penal Code section 830.5 whose authority extends to any place in the state while engaged in the performance of the duties of their respective employment and for the purpose of carrying out the primary function of their employment, as follows:
1) To conditions of parole, probation, mandatory supervision, or post-release community supervision by any person in this state on parole, probation, mandatory supervision, or post-release community supervision.
2) To the escape of any inmate or ward from a state or local institution. 3) To the transportation of persons on parole, probation, mandatory supervision, or post-release community supervision.
4) To violations of any penal provisions of law which are discovered while performing the usual or authorized duties of his or her employment. 5) To the rendering of mutual aid to any other law enforcement agency.

4.0 TERM
This MOU became effective upon execution by the Chief Probation Officer of Riverside County and the Chiefs or City Managers of each participating PACT agency or their designees. The original term of this MOU commenced on July 1, 2023, and is now in its second year, continuing through June 30, 2025. Following this period, the MOU will automatically renew annually for each fiscal year from July 1 to June 30, and shall remain in effect until June 30, 2028, unless modified or terminated as specified in Section 5.0 of this MOU.

5.0 AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF MOU
478

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 5
This MOU may be amended at any time with the written concurrence of all parties. This MOU, along with any incorporated attachments, fully expresses all understandings of the parties concerning all matters covered and shall constitute the total MOU. No addition to, or alteration of, the terms of this MOU whether by written or verbal understanding of the parties, their officers, agents or employees, shall be valid unless made in the form of a written amendment to this MOU formally approved and executed by both Probation and each participating PACT agency. Consideration for amendment will be given upon written notification by one party to the others. The parties will review this MOU at least annually and modify as needed.

Any participating PACT agency can withdraw participation in this MOU with or without cause upon thirty (30) days written notification to the other parties. Participation withdrawal will take effect thirty (30) days following receipt of notification and terms and conditions of this MOU continue in full force for the remaining PACT agencies.

This MOU can be terminated with or without cause by any party upon thirty (30) days written notification to the other parties or due to unavailability of funding. Termination of the MOU will take effect thirty (30) days following receipt of the written notice of termination or upon effective date of funding expiration.

6.0 AUDITS
The parties agree that any duly authorized representative of the Federal, State, or local government shall have the right to audit, inspect, copy or transcribe any pertinent records, electronic data and documentation relating to this MOU. Any audit exception, as it relates to this MOU, resulting from an audit conducted by any duly authorized representative of the Federal, State, or local government shall be the responsibility of the participating PACT agencies. Any audit disallowance adjustments must be paid in full upon demand if required, or may be withheld at the discretion of the Chief Probation Officer against amounts due to PACT agencies under this MOU or any PACT agreement with Probation.

7.0 RECORDS RETENTION
Each party agrees to retain all records pertaining to this MOU for the period indicated in the Riverside County Records Retention General Schedule per Board of Supervisors Policy A-43 unless otherwise indicated by the source of funds. If, at the end of the retention period, there is ongoing litigation or an audit involving those records, each party shall retain the original records until the resolution of such litigation or audit. 479

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 6

8.0 FINANCIAL REPORTS
Fourfinancial reports are to be submitted quarterly by each PACT partner during each fiscal year covering the following reporting periods:

Quarter Reporting Period
1 July 1 – September 30
2 July 1 – December 31
3 July 1 – March 31
4 July 1 – June 30
The CCPEC-approved template for financial report submission is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. The summary PACT report for each quarter will be compiled and presented to CCPEC by Probation. Due dates for quarterly financial reports are established annually by the CCPEC.

9.0 CONFIDENTIALITY
All parties agree to maintain the confidentiality of all information in accordance with all applicable Federal, State and local laws and regulations.

10.0 HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION
Each participating agency agrees to indemnify and hold the other participating agencies harmless from any and all liability for death, injury and/or damage, actual or alleged, to persons or property, arising out of, or resulting from negligent acts or omissions of the indemnifying party or its employees. When Probation, PACT itself, any participating agency, or its agents, are held liable for deaths or injuries to persons or property, each party’s liability for contribution or indemnity for such injuries shall be based proportionately upon the contributions of each participating agency. In the event of liability imposed upon any of the participating agencies for death, injury, and/or damage which is caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any of the parties in the performance of this MOU, the contribution of the party or parties not directly responsible for the negligent or wrongful act or omission shall be limited to $100.00. The party or parties directly responsible for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions shall indemnify, defend, and hold the other parties harmless from any liability for death, injury and/or damage arising out of the performance of this MOU.

11.0 ASSIGNMENT
480

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 7
This MOU shall not be assigned by any party hereto, either in whole or in part, without prior written consent ofthe other parties. Any assignment or purported assignment ofthis MOU without the prior written consent will be deemed void and of no force or effect.

12.0 LICENSE AND CERTIFICATIONS
When applicable, all parties verify upon execution of this MOU, that all work performed pursuant to this MOU will be performed by properly trained and licensed/certified staff who possess current and valid license/certifications in compliance with any local, State, and Federal laws.

13.0 COMPLIANCE, GOVERNING LAW, AND SEVERABILITY
The parties shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations.

In the event there is a conflict between the various applicable laws and regulations, the parties shall comply with the more restrictive law or regulation. Any legal action related to this MOU shall be filed only in the Superior Court for the State of California in Riverside, California. All parties shall be obligated to attend a mediation session before a neutral thirdparty mediator prior to the filing of any legal action.

If any provision in this MOU is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or enforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way.

14.0 COMPENSATION

14.1 Maximum Amount:

The maximum allowable costs under this MOU shall not exceed the approved CCPEC for each annual fiscal year’s budget. Annual allocations assigned to each PACT agency are detailed in the annual budget proposal Exhibit C, attached hereto, and incorporated herein. It is agreed that a revised budget will be submitted to the CCPEC for approval each FISCAL year.

14.2 Method, Time and Schedule/Condition of Payments:

Within thirty (30) days of the end of each month in which services were rendered, each participating PACT agency will prepare and submit to Probation’s Accounts Payable, via email [email protected], a reimbursement claim/journal entry for 481

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 8
services and expenditures performed and incurred during the month. Using the invoice template, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B, claim documentation will include, but is not limited to, an invoice with an itemized expenditure summary of Salaries & Benefits and Services & Supplies; and copies of timesheets, pay registers, and vendor invoices or receipts, as applicable.

Upon review and approval, Probation shall process each claim within fifteen (15) business days. The corresponding payment voucher will be forwarded to the County Auditor-Controller’s office for processing. Invoices will be held beyond the fifteen (15) business days when an annual fiscal year realignment budget has not been approved by the CCPEC and the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. Upon approval by both governing bodies, held invoices will be released to the Auditor-Controller’s office for processing.

Each year, estimates for the month ending June 30 should be provided to Probation by June 20 with the final invoice due July 31 or next available working day.

If PACT ceases provision ofservicesfor any period, then no payment will apply for that period. Probation will reimburse participating PACT agencies for services provided in accordance with the terms and conditions contained herein.

Additional clarifications on the reimbursement process are provided as part of the Frequently Asked Questions, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit D.

14.3 Use of Funds:

PACT agencies shall not use any funds received pursuant to this MOU for any other program, project, or purpose. The parties shall not use realignment fundsto supplant by claiming reimbursement from Probation for any costs which have been paid by another source of revenue. The parties agree not to use funds received pursuant to this MOU, either directly or indirectly, for purposes of obtaining funds under any other program without prior written approval of Probation. Additional guidelines for use of fundsreceived pursuant to this MOU are provided in the Funding and Reimbursement Policy and Guidelines for Regional PAC Teams as developed by the Association of Riverside County Chiefs of Police and Sheriff (ARCCOPS) in cooperation with Probation, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit E. Any revisions by ARCCOPS to the guidelines will supersede the attached exhibit. 482

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 9

14.4 Disallowance:

In the event a party receives paymentforservices pursuantto thisMOUwhich islater disallowed for nonconformance with the terms and conditions herein by Probation, the party shall promptly refund the disallowed amount to Probation upon request, or at its option, Probation may offset the amount disallowed from any payment due to the party under any PACT agreement with Probation.

14.5 Availability of Funding:

Probation’s obligation for payment under this MOU is contingent upon the availability of funds from which payment can be made.

15.0 NOTICES
All notices, claims, correspondence, reports, and/or statements authorized or required by this MOU shall be addressed for each location as follows:

Riverside County Probation Department
Probation Administration
Administrative Services Manager III – Fiscal Services Division P.O. Box 833
Riverside, CA 92502
(951) 955-2983
Post-release Accountability and Compliance Team
Tony Conrad, Chief of Police
Murrieta Police Department
2 Town Square
Murrieta, CA 92562
(951) 461-6358
[email protected]
All notices shall be deemed effective when they are made in writing, addressed as indicated above, and deposited in the United States mail. Any notices, correspondence, reports, and/or statements authorized or required by this MOU addressed in any other fashion will not be acceptable.
483

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 10

16.0 MERGER CLAUSE
This MOU, including any attachments or exhibits, constitutes the entire agreement of the parties with respect to its subject matter and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous representations, proposals, discussions and communications, whether oral or in writing, including the FY23-24 MOU.

17.0 ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES
Each party of this MOU agrees to the use of electronic signatures, such as digital signatures that meet the requirements of the California Uniform Electronic Transactions Act ((“CUETA”) Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1633.1 to 1633.17), for executing this MOU. The parties further agree that the electronic signature(s) included herein are intended to authenticate this writing and to have the same force and effect as manual signatures. Electronic signature means an electronic sound, symbol, or process attached to or logically associated with an electronic record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the electronic record pursuant to the CUETA as amended from time to time. Digital signature means an electronic identifier, created by computer, intended by the party using it to have the same force and effect as the use of a manual signature, and shall be reasonably relied upon by the parties. For purposes of this section, a digital signature is a type of "electronic signature" as defined in subdivision (i) of Section 1633.2 of the Civil Code. 484

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 11

SIGNATURE PAGE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this MOU has been executed by and on behalf of Riverside County Probation Department and the participating Post-release Accountability and Compliance Team local law enforcement agencies by the signatures of the duly authorized respective agents, as of the day and year written herein below.
_____________________________________ __________________ Christopher H. Wright, Chief Probation Officer Date
Riverside County Probation Department

APPROVED AS TO FORM
Minh C. Tran
County Counsel
BY: ___________________________
Lisa Sanchez
Deputy County Counsel
DATE: _________________________
485

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 12

SIGNATURE PAGE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this MOU has been executed by and on behalf of Riverside County Probation Department and the participating Post-release Accountability and Compliance Team local law enforcement agencies by the signatures of the duly authorized respective agents, as of the day and year written herein below.
________________________________ ________________________ Doug Schulze, City Manager Date
City of Banning
486

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 13

SIGNATURE PAGE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this MOU has been executed by and on behalf of Riverside County Probation Department and the participating Post-release Accountability and Compliance Team local law enforcement agencies by the signatures of the duly authorized respective agents, as of the day and year written herein below.
_____________________________________ __________________ Sean Thuilliez, Chief of Police Date
Beaumont Police Department
487

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 14

SIGNATURE PAGE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this MOU has been executed by and on behalf of Riverside County Probation Department and the participating Post-release Accountability and Compliance Team local law enforcement agencies by the signatures of the duly authorized respective agents, as of the day and year written herein below.
_____________________________________ __________________ Mallory Crecelius, City Manager Date
City of Blythe
488

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 15

SIGNATURE PAGE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this MOU has been executed by and on behalf of Riverside County Probation Department and the participating Post-release Accountability and Compliance Team local law enforcement agencies by the signatures of the duly authorized respective agents, as of the day and year written herein below.
_____________________________________ __________________ Charles P. McClendon, City Manager Date
Cathedral City
489

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 16

SIGNATURE PAGE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this MOU has been executed by and on behalf of Riverside County Probation Department and the participating Post-release Accountability and Compliance Team local law enforcement agencies by the signatures of the duly authorized respective agents, as of the day and year written herein below.
_____________________________________ __________________ Robert Newman, Chief of Police Date
Corona Police Department
490

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 17

SIGNATURE PAGE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this MOU has been executed by and on behalf of Riverside County Probation Department and the participating Post-release Accountability and Compliance Team local law enforcement agencies by the signatures of the duly authorized respective agents, as of the day and year written herein below.
_____________________________________ __________________ Frank J. Luckino, City Manager Date
City of Desert Hot Springs
491

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 18

SIGNATURE PAGE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this MOU has been executed by and on behalf of Riverside County Probation Department and the participating Post-release Accountability and Compliance Team local law enforcement agencies by the signatures of the duly authorized respective agents, as of the day and year written herein below.
_____________________________________ __________________ Michael Arellano, Chief of Police Date
Hemet Police Department
492

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 19

SIGNATURE PAGE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this MOU has been executed by and on behalf of Riverside County Probation Department and the participating Post-release Accountability and Compliance Team local law enforcement agencies by the signatures of the duly authorized respective agents, as of the day and year written herein below.
_____________________________________ __________________ Bryan Montgomery, City Manager Date
City of Indio
493

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 20

SIGNATURE PAGE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this MOU has been executed by and on behalf of Riverside County Probation Department and the participating Post-release Accountability and Compliance Team local law enforcement agencies by the signatures of the duly authorized respective agents, as of the day and year written herein below.
_____________________________________ __________________ Armando G. Villa, City Manager Date
City of Menifee
494

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 21

SIGNATURE PAGE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this MOU has been executed by and on behalf of Riverside County Probation Department and the participating Post-release Accountability and Compliance Team local law enforcement agencies by the signatures of the duly authorized respective agents, as of the day and year written herein below.
_____________________________________ __________________ Kim Summers, City Manager Date
City of Murrieta

495

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 22

SIGNATURE PAGE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this MOU has been executed by and on behalf of Riverside County Probation Department and the participating Post-release Accountability and Compliance Team local law enforcement agencies by the signatures of the duly authorized respective agents, as of the day and year written herein below.
_____________________________________ __________________ Mike Futrell, City Manager Date
City of Riverside
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
Donesia Gause, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
BY:___________________________
Rahman N. Gerren
Deputy City Attorney
CERTIFIED AS TO FUNDS AVAILABILITY:

BY:___________________________
Assistant Chief Financial Officer
496

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 23

SIGNATURE PAGE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this MOU has been executed by and on behalf of Riverside County Probation Department and the participating Post-release Accountability and Compliance Team local law enforcement agencies by the signatures of the duly authorized respective agents, as of the day and year written herein below.
_____________________________________ __________________ Chad Bianco Date
Riverside County Sheriff-Coroner
(Coachella, Lake Elsinore and San Jacinto Stations)

APPROVED AS TO FORM
Minh C. Tran
County Counsel
BY: ___________________________
Amrit P. Dhillon
Deputy County Counsel
DATE: _________________________
497

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 24 CCPEC Agency: (Department Name)
Dept Number (if applicable): (Budget Unit)
Reporting Period (1, 2, 3, or 4) (Period #)

EXPENDITURES
FY (YY/YY) 0% (Reporting Period Dates) (Next Period Dates) FY (YY/YY) Year-end Year-end Full-Year (On-Going) Level Description Budget Of Budget Actuals Estimates Estimates Variance Estimates 1 Salaries & Benefits $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
2 Supplies & Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Other Charges 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Fixed Assets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Interfund Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Expenditures $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

DEPARTMENTAL REVENUE
FY (YY/YY) 0% (Reporting Period Dates) (Next Period Dates) FY (YY/YY) Year-end Year-end Full-Year (On-Going) Code Description Budget Of Budget Actuals Estimates Estimates Variance Estimates $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Dept. Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NET COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
CCPEC Agency: (Department Name)
Dept Number (if applicable): (Budget Unit)
Reporting Period (1, 2, 3, or 4) (Period #)

1. Description of current budget status, including any known or potential problem areas within the budget and options and/or recommendations for addressing these issues.

2. Provide a summary of AB 109 activities performed during the reporting period (if desired, copies of the monthly CCPEC reports may be attached).

Reporting Period:

Prepared by: Approved by:

Date: Date:

Exhibit A-Quarterly Financial Summary Report Template
AB 109 Community Corrections Partnership Executive Committee FY 2024/25 Financial Report - Operating Funds
(Reporting Period Dates)

NARRATIVE
(Please include in this section budget details such as number of filled/vacant positions, fixed asset expenditures, etc.) (Reporting Period Dates)
498

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT
BUDGET PROPOSAL FY 2024/25
P a g e 25 |

EXHIBIT B

PACT INVOICE TEMPLATE
(City Logo/ Letterhead) INVOICE:

DATE:

DUE DATE:

Bill to:

RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT

FISCAL UNIT ADMIN SVC MGR
PO BOX 833
RIVERSIDE, CA 92502
Invoice Type: PACT Description: (Month) Invoice
Description Total Price
PACT (City Name) Reimbursement for (Month) Services
1) Salaries and Benefits (Period: MM/DD/YR-MM/DD/YR)
2) Supplies(receipts attached)
Total Due $ -
Documentation with invoice includes copies of timesheets for billing period and verification of salary and benefits rates charged. Please note, for confidentiality purpose, original timesheets and any further verification of employees compensation will be on file with the City of (City Name), Human Resources Department and available to an authorized auditing official for review.

I, the undersigned, hereby certify the above claim submitted for reimbursement are true and correct Realignment expenditures in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Riverside County Probation Department and the Post-release Accountability and Compliance Team (PACT).

Signature Title Date
Please remit payment to:
(Provide city information)
499

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT
BUDGET PROPOSAL FY 2024/25
P a g e 26

EXHIBIT C
DISTRIBUTION OF ANNUAL PACT ALLOCATION BY CITY FY24-25

EAST ALLOCATION
City of Cathedral City (Sergeant) $297,000.00
City of Cathedral City $238,150.00
City of Coachella $238,150.00
City of Desert Hot Springs $238,150.00
City of Indio $238,150.00
City of Blythe $238,150.00
City of Blythe $238,150.00
WEST
City of Corona $238,150.00
City of Corona (Corporal) $261,800.00
City of Riverside $238,150.00
City of Riverside (Sergeant) $297,000.00

CENTRAL
City of Banning $238,150.00
City of Banning $238,150.00
City of Beaumont $238,150.00
City of Beaumont $238,150.00
City of Hemet (Sergeant) $297,000.00
City of Lake Elsinore $238,150.00
City of Menifee $238,150.00
City of Murrieta $238,150.00
City of San Jacinto $238,150.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total Annual Pact Allocation FY24/25 $4,963,200.00
*PACT agencies with sergeants assigned to the teams receive $297,000 each, PACT agencies without sergeants assigned to the teams receive $238,150, and corporals receive $261,800, as dictated by the approved ARCCOPS memorandum (Exhibit E) revised 6/2024. 500

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 27
Exhibit D
Frequently Asked Questions

1. Year End:
a. What is a year-end estimate claim and what needs to be included? i. A year-end estimate claim allows Probation to encumber funds for payment from the current fiscal year into the beginning of the next to cover expenditures incurred during the month of June and have a record that the final submittal is pending.
ii. If funds are not encumbered to cover final year-end claims and a claim is submitted, the reimbursement may be charged against the PACT agency’s allocation for the next fiscal year.
iii. To submit a year-end estimate claim form:

1. Use the Invoice Template (Exhibit B) provided,

2. In the location on the form for listing the month/year of the claim, please mark as the June Estimate,

3. Based on remaining annual funds and use of fundsto date generate estimated expenditures for the month of June.

4. Attach any advance approvals for services/supply/equipment purchases, and

5. Submit estimate to Probation no later than June 20 of each year. b. What if the claim for actual year-end expenditures is not submitted before the County’s year-end submission deadline?
i. If the claim for actual year-end expenditures is not received by the deadline, Probation will process payment to the PACT agency using the estimate provided.
ii. When the claim isreceived (after the deadline), if expenditures exceed the estimate, Probation will process payment for the difference and the difference will be paid from any rollover funds. If the expenditures are less than the estimate, the PACT agency isrequired to refund the overpayment back to Probation.
c. What documentation is needed to include major purchases in the year-end estimate?
501

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 28
i. To include year-end expenditures that will not complete processing in the current fiscal year, the submitting PACT agency needs to provide proof of intent to purchase the major item, such as vehicles.
ii. Proof of intent to purchase can be represented by approval documents from a City Council, an approved purchase order, an approved requisition, or a copy of the documents used by the City to encumber funds in their own fiscal year budget allowing Probation sufficient documentation to encumber funds to reimburse the submitting PACT agency. d. What if the estimate is overstated?
i. If any unused funds are remaining after the final year-end reimbursement claim is submitted (prior to year-end deadline), the funds will be released for use within Realignment.

2. Staff Substitution for Another PACT Agency
a. What is the process to submit claims when substituting PACT staff by another police department due to staff shortages?
i. The Police Department providing the staff substitution must bill the PACT Agency suffering the staff shortage.
ii. The PACT Agency suffering the staff shortage will then submit their monthly claim to Probation. The claim should include back-up documentation reflecting invoices and payment to the substituting Police Department for staff services rendered. Any back-up documentation provided by the substituting Police Department (such as timesheets) should be included in the monthly claim.
iii. PACT Agencies cannot bill against another PACT Agency’s allocation.

3. Mileage Claims
a. What documentation is required to submit for mileage claims? i. A mileage log reflecting record of what miles are used for PACT specific duties is sufficient back-up for a mileage claim.
b. What if a vehicle is 100% PACT?
i. Fuel reimbursement statements reflecting the vehicle’s mileage use over the course of the fiscal year is sufficient back-up for mileage reimbursement.
502

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 29

4. Staff Time
a. Can vacation, sick, and compensation time earned be paid? i. Yes, vacation, sick, and compensation time earned while performing PACT duties can be paid.
ii. Detailed tracking of when the time is earned and when it is paid will need to be provided as back-up to the claim. The tracking is necessary to ensure no duplication of payment is requested (i.e. reimbursement for compensation time on one pay period and on the next pay period requesting reimbursement for time-off using those same backed compensation time hours). A tracking sheet can be provided upon request. iii. PACT Agencies that allow their officers to ‘sell back’ their compensation time at the end of the year can claim those hours as part of their reimbursement. Detailed tracking reflecting that the compensation time is earned while performing PACT duties must be submitted as back-up. b. Our police department uses electronic timesheets. Is a report from the timesheet system acceptable back-up?
i. Yes, a report from the timesheet system is acceptable as long as it reflects when the employee approved their timesheet and when the supervisors counter-approved their timesheets.
503

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 30
Exhibit E
Funding & Reimbursement Policy and Guidelines for Regional PAC Teams FUNDING AND REIMBURSEMENT POLICY AND GUIDELINES FOR REGIONAL P.A.C. TEAMS Rev. 6/2024
I. PURPOSE: The purpose of this policy is to set forth standardized procedures for oversight and funding of personnel assigned to Regional PAC Teams.

II. ORGANIZATION: Each regional PAC Team will establish a governing board, including command-level representatives from each participating agency.

A. The regional governing board will provide operational and financial support and oversight to the regional team.

B. The regional board may also determine when a financial need merits a request for additional funding to one of the funding entities (CCPEC or ARCCOPS).

III. MEMBERSHIP: PAC Team membership is open to all law enforcement agencies who are members of ARCCOPS. The voting membership of ARCCOPS shall determine which agencies will receive funding.

A. Agencies interested in participating and receiving reimbursement shall submit a request to the ARCCOPS voting membership.

1. ARCCOPS will determine agency participation and reimbursement as requested based on available funding and regional needs.

IV. FUNDING & REIMBURSEMENT: Funding for PACT personnel is provided through the Community Corrections Partnership Executive Committee (CCPEC) and the Riverside County allocation of AB- 109 mitigation grant (Cal Chief’s).

A. Participating PAC Team agencies may submit for reimbursement for direct costs associated with deploying personnel dedicated to the PAC Team.

B. Reimbursement will be limited to the following:
504

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 31

1. Actual cost of allsalary, benefits, paid leave, and overtime paid to agency employees for work while assigned and working for a PAC Team.

2. Mileage (at the published IRS rate) for miles traveled using an agency vehicle for travel to, from, and during PAC Team activities.

3. Equipment as needed for each PACT Officer, Deputy, and/or PAC Team.

C. Each PAC Team agency head will determine how funding reimbursement will be used, in accordance with Section IV.B. of this Exhibit E.

D. Total reimbursement shall not exceed $238,150 per fiscal year for each police officer or detective assigned; $261,800 per fiscal year for corporal assigned; and $297,000 per fiscal year for each sergeant assigned to supervise a PAC Team.

E. Participating agencies shall submit detailed expenditure claims on a monthly basis to the appropriate funding entity (CCPEC via County Probation). 505

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ON BEHALF OF ITS

PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND

POST-RELEASE ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE TEAM

FOR PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Page | 12

SIGNATURE PAGE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this MOU has been executed by and on behalf of Riverside County Probation Department and the participating Post-release Accountability and Compliance Team local law enforcement agencies by the signatures of the duly authorized respective agents, as of the day and year written herein below.
________________________________ ________________________ Doug Schulze, City Manager Date
City of Banning
506

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Douglas Schulze, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Nate Smith, Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer Art Vela, Director of Public Works
MEETING DATE: January 14, 2025
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution 2025-02, Approving the Administrative Services Agreement between Riverside County and the City of Banning related to County Service Area 152, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater (NPDES) Assessment
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2025-02.

BACKGROUND:

The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) is a federally mandated program to control non-point sources of runoff pollution. The NPDES program is part of the Clean Water Act enacted by Congress in 1987. The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin, Region No. 7 (“Regional Board”), in implementing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s storm water NPDES permit program, requires that the Districts and Incorporated Cities within the Whitewater River Basin obtain a joint permit to discharge storm water into the various storm channels and washes throughout the Whitewater River Watershed area. The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) and Riverside County are acting as the Lead Agency with the City of Banning being a co-permittee, along with the various other agencies and municipalities located within the Whitewater River Basin. The current Permit was adopted by the Regional Board on June 20, 2013, expired on June 19, 2018 and has been negotiated and worked on with the affected parties over the past six years. A new permit (“2025 NPDES Permit”) that has been negotiated with the Regional Board is in review. It is anticipated to be adopted by the end of FY 2024/2025 and will take effect 90 days later.

The City of Banning is required, through Best Management Practices (BMPs), to implement practices within our community which reduce pollutants entering into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The major components of the existing and 2025 NPDES Permit to implement the BMPs include: project management, attendance at Desert Task Force meetings, record keeping and Annual Report preparation; illegal dumping and illicit connection detection, inspection, spill prevention and cleanup activities; commercial and industrial facilities inspections (about 60 per year) and the review of all City issued business licenses for SB 205 compliance; implementing land development and plan review procedures including plan check, preparing Conditions of Approval, reviewing erosion control plans and WQMPs and ensuring post construction self-inspections are performed annually by required businesses; enforcing and implementing construction activities requirements of City and private development projects including construction site inspections, review of developer’s BMPs, erosion control plans and SWPPPs (Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans), and ensuring compliance with the Regional Board’s Construction General Permit requirements; maintaining City facilities, including the City Corporate and Water Yards and Fire Station, and storm drains and performing inspections and 507
maintenance, removing trash and debris from the storm drain system, and from roads through street sweeping; and implementing public education and outreach programs by providing brochures to the public at City events and at the public counter, to businesses and contractors through inspections and storm water training of municipal staff.

The NPDES program costs the City about $300,000 annually to manage the current NPDES Permit. The new 2025 NPDES Permit will cost more due to its new requirements. One way to generate revenue for the program would be to reinstate a “grandfathered” assessment from 1994, called the County Service Area (CSA) 152 NPDES assessment. This stormwater assessment is currently collected by the County on behalf of a number of participating cities via property tax bills. The County administers and manages the CSA 152 program funds pursuant to CSA 152 Administrative Services Agreements with the participating cities. The County last collected the assessment in the City in 1994 at a rate of $4.72/BAU/year. A BAU is a “benefit assessment unit” as defined by the County. When the assessment is resumed, an owner of a single-family home in the City will pay 1 BAU/year, amounting to $4.72/year.

Since the rate was adopted in 1994 prior to the passage of Proposition 218, any increase in the rate would require a Proposition 218 Hearing and vote through an assessment balloting proceeding. In essence, the stormwater assessment is “grandfathered in” as an allowable assessment prior to Proposition 218 so long as the rate is not increased.
2025 CSA 152 Administrative Services Agreement
Public Works Department, Engineering Division, staff met with the Riverside County Economic Development Office and the City Attorney’s Office several times over the past year to gather information and determine if the City or County had ever withdrawn from the CSA 152 Administrative Services Agreement with the County. After researching this, it appears neither the City nor County ever withdrew from the CSA 152 Agreement and by approving the 2025 CSA 152 Agreement, the City would authorize the County to resume collecting the assessment starting in FY 2025/2026.

The County updates the CSA 152 Administrative Services Agreement every 9 years or so, and the attached CSA 152 Agreement is the 2025 version that all participating agencies will execute. The term on the Agreement is for five years, with two (2) two year renewal options allowed, for a total of nine (9) years. Either party may withdraw with 30 days of advance notice given to the other party. The Agreement establishes the responsibilities and obligations of each Party concerning the management and financing of CSA 152. The County collects the stormwater assessment on behalf of the City and then reimburses the City actual expenditures incurred from implementing the NPDES Permit each fiscal year. The County will deduct the 6% Administration Fee charge from the apportionment/assessment collected.

Background on CSA 152 NPDES Assessment
LAFCO annexed the City of Banning into County Service Area 152 when the County of Riverside adopted Resolution No. 93-454 (Attachment 2) on December 21, 1993, at the City’s request, in order to have the County place an assessment on property owner’s tax bills to fund expenditures required by the NPDES Permit. On March 22, 1994, City Council Resolution No. 1994-028 (Attachment 3) was adopted to fund the City’s NPDES program, whereby the annual assessment rate for FY 1994/1995 for CSA 152 was set at $4.72 per Benefit Assessment Unit.

On September 27, 1994 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1994-107, approving the Administrative Services Agreement for the CSA 152 Program between the City of Banning and Riverside County, shown as Attachment 4. The County had formed CSA 152 to finance portions of its programs and obligations associated with its Municipal NPDES Permit. The Agreement sets forth the responsibilities of the County and City with respect to the assessment. It provides for the City to annually approve a budget and report its activities in connection with its NPDES costs to the City. In addition, the City is responsible for updating parcel information for properties in the City. The County incorporates the City’s budget and the budgets of other participating cities into the County’s CSA 152 budget, holds an annual hearing, approves the assessments, and submits the assessments for collection on the Tax Roll. The County collects an Administrative Fee of 6% of the revenues collected for this work. Both County and City staff 508
performed research, and no records were found showing either party has ever withdrawn from this Agreement. Numerous other cities also joined CSA 152 to ensure funding of their NPDES program.

The CSA 152 Agreement (used by all member agencies) with the County of Riverside was recently updated by the County and was given to staff in mid-November of 2024 for staff and City Attorney’s Office review. There are no significant changes; their Administration Fee for managing the assessment funds for the cities will remain at 6% of the revenues collected. Once the City executes this Agreement, the County will present it, along with the other member cities’ signed Agreements, to the County Board of Supervisors for execution.

On September 24, 2024, a workshop was presented by the Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer and the City Council directed staff to pursue reinstating the CSA 152 assessment. On December 10, 2024 the City Council approved Resolution No. 2024-197 awarding a consultant contract to Webb Municipal Finance, LLC for municipal assessments services to reinstate the CSA 152 stormwater assessment for FY 2025/2026. The City Council will be asked to approve the NPDES budget and current BAU rate of $4.72/BAU for FY 2025/2026 in the Spring of 2025. The City would need to provide the County with the list of Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) to place on the FY 2025/2026 Tax Roll by mid-May of 2025. Cities must provide updates/additional parcels from new developments annually to the County.

JUSTIFICATION:

The upcoming 2025 NPDES Permit will become effective in late 2025 and it has new and enhanced requirements that will significantly impact the City financially, as additional computer software, trash capture devices, consultant costs and City staff time will be needed. The execution of the 2025 CSA 152 Agreement is required for the County to collect the stormwater assessments on behalf of the City.

This action does not transmit the assessment roll to the County for collection. Separate Council action will be required at that time, and at the conclusion of the preparation of the assessment roll that is currently underway, anticipated to occur in February or March 2025.

FISCAL IMPACT:

CSA 152 provides a funding mechanism for the NPDES program. Eleven cities, including Palm Springs, Rancho Mirage, and Desert Hot Springs also joined CSA 152 to ensure funding of their NPDES program.

The County has established an administration fee of 6% of the budget revenues for services to be provided under the proposed Agreement. This administration fee will be deducted from the assessment revenues collected by the County.

The re-establishment of the CSA 152 assessment will allow the City to partially offset the expenses incurred in implementing the NPDES program. The program is currently funded through the Streets Fund (Fund 100). Approval of the agreement and the fee will require less funding to be allocated from streets maintenance activities to storm water maintenance activities.

ALTERNATIVES:

If the City Council elects to not approve this Resolution, there will be no CSA 152 stormwater assessment collected. The NPDES Program would continue to be an unfunded mandate, with no revenue collected to support the program and its costs would continue to be absorbed by the Streets Fund. The new 2025 NPDES Permit has significant costs associated with it and will continue to rise over the future. The NPDES Permit must be complied with to avoid fines from Regional Board No. 7 of the State Water Resources Control Board.

BUDGETED?:

No
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT:
509
Yes
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 2025-02, RivCo NPDES Assessment.docx

2. Exhibit A, NPDES CSA 152 2025 Agreement.docx

3. Att. 2 - County Reso. No. 93-454, formation of CSA 152, 12.21.93.pdf

4. Att. 3 - CC Reso. No. 1994-028, approving initial CSA 152 rates, 3.22.94.pdf

5. Att. 4 - CC Reso. No. 1994-107, approving CSA 152 Agree.pdf 510
Resolution 2025-02

RESOLUTION 2025-02

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA,

APPROVING THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN RIVERSIDE COUNTY AND THE CITY OF BANNING RELATED TO COUNTY SERVICE AREA 152,

NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM STORMWATER (NPDES)

ASSESSMENT
WHEREAS, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) is a federally mandated program to control non-point sources of runoff pollution and the NPDES program is part of the Clean Water Act enacted by Congress in 1987. The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin, Region No. 7, in implementing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s storm water NPDES permit program, requires that the Districts and Incorporated Cities within the Whitewater River Basin obtain a joint permit to discharge storm water into the various storm channels and washes throughout the Whitewater River Watershed area; and WHEREAS, the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) and Riverside County are acting as the Lead Agency with the City of Banning being a co-permittee, along with the various other agencies and municipalities located within the Whitewater River Basin. The new 2025 NPDES Permit will cost the City much more to implement due to its new requirements; and
WHEREAS, one way to generate revenue for the program would be to reinstate a “grandfathered” assessment from 1994, called the County Service Area (CSA) 152 NPDES assessment and this stormwater assessment is currently collected by the County on behalf of a number of participating cities via property tax bills; and WHEREAS, on September 10, 2024, a CSA 152 Stormwater assessment workshop was presented by the Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer and the City Council directed staff to pursue reinstating the CSA 152 assessment; and WHEREAS, a public participation and community outreach phase occurred in October and November of 2024 to let the residents and property owners know of public meetings held with the Public Works Department to explain the CSA 152 assessment and its purpose with regard to providing funds for the NPDES Program; and
WHEREAS, the CSA 152 Agreement (used by all member agencies) with the County of Riverside was just updated by the County and was given to staff in mid-November of 2024 for City staff and City Attorney’s Office review; and
WHEREAS, on December 10, 2024 the City Council approved Resolution No. 2024-197 awarding a consultant contract to Webb Municipal Finance, LLC to prepare the Assessment Roll to reinstate CSA 152 stormwater assessments for FY 2025/2026; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved the reinstatement of CSA 152, and thus the execution of the CSA 152 NPDES Stormwater Assessment Agreement between Riverside County and the City of Banning related to CSA 152, NPDES Stormwater Assessment is required for the County to collect the stormwater assessments on behalf of the City. 511
Resolution 2025-02

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council approves the Administrative Services Agreement between Riverside County and the City of Banning related to County Service Area (CSA 152), NPDES (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) Stormwater Assessment.

SECTION 2. The City Council authorizes the City Manager to make non-substantive changes to the CSA 152 NPDES Stormwater Assessment Agreement and to execute the Administrative Services Agreement between Riverside County and the City of Banning related to CSA 152, NPDES Stormwater Assessment.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of January, 2025.

Sheri Flynn, Mayor
City of Banning
ATTEST:

Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk
City of Banning
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

John Pinkney, City Attorney
512
Resolution 2025-02

CERTIFICATION:

I, Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2025-02, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 14th day of January 2025 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________________
Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk
City of Banning, California
513
Resolution 2025-02

Exhibit A
Administrative Services Agreement between Riverside County and the City of Banning related to County Service Area (CSA 152), NPDES (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) Stormwater Assessment
514

Updated 09/2024
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR CSA 152 NPDES PROGRAM

BETWEEN

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND CITY OF BANNING
The Administrative Services Agreement for CSA 152 NPDES Program (“Agreement”), entered into as of this _____ day of _________ 2025 by the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (“COUNTY”) and the CITY OF BANNING (“CITY”) (individually “Party” and collectively “Parties”) establishes the responsibilities and obligations of each Party concerning the management and financing of COUNTY SERVICE AREA 152 NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (“CSA 152”).

RECITALS
WHEREAS, Congress in 1987 added Section 402(p) to the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) [33 U.S.C. 1342(p)]; and,
WHEREAS, Section 402(p) requires certain municipalities, construction and industrial facilities to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit before discharging storm water into the waters of the United States; and, WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY have obtained or will obtain the appropriate municipal NPDES Permit as applicable for each of the three watersheds of the County of Riverside; and, WHEREAS, COUNTY has formed CSA 152 to finance a portion of its programs and obligations associated with the municipal NPDES Permits and individual General NPDES Permits; and,
WHEREAS, cooperation between COUNTY and CITY in the administration and implementation of the NPDES Permits is in the best interests of COUNTY and CITY; and, WHEREAS, CITY was formally annexed into CSA 152 by COUNTY Resolution No. 93- 454 on December 21, 1993; and,
WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY are to perform certain duties prescribed in this Agreement that will benefit all Parties;
515

Updated 09/2024
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:

1. DELEGATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES. The responsibilities of each Party shall be as follows:
a. CITY shall assume the responsibilities and meet the requirements of CSA 152 administration for CITY by:
i. Providing additions to previous year’s tax roll (if any) to be placed on the upcoming fiscal year tax roll.
ii. Providing agenda item approving Benefit Assessment Unit (BAU) Levy and CITY’S CSA 152 budget for each fiscal year.
iii. Notify COUNTY of any changes to Tax Rate Area of individual parcels to be placed on Tax Roll.
iv. Research parcels that were rejected from list of Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) submitted to COUNTY.
v. Notify COUNTY of any corrections to rejected parcels to be placed on Tax Roll prior to Auditor Controllers deadline for submittal of APNs. vi. Submit to COUNTY requests for reimbursement of actual expenditures incurred under provision of approved CITY CSA 152 budget. b. COUNTY shall assume the responsibilities and meet the requirements of CSA 152 administration for COUNTY and CITY by:
i. Forwarding of APNs received from CITY to Auditor Controller to be placed on Tax Roll.
ii. Notify CITY of any rejected parcels.
iii. Forward CITY’S corrections of rejected parcels to Auditor Controller. iv. Provide spreadsheet of CSA 152 assessments placed on tax roll and fiscal year financial summary.
v. Collect assessment for CSA 152 on behalf of CITY.
vi. Reimburse CITY for actual expenditures incurred under provision of approved CITY CSA 152 budget.
516

Updated 09/2024
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

2. FEES AND PAYMENT. COUNTY shall administer CSA 152 for the benefit of COUNTY and CITY. COUNTY shall charge six (6%) percent of new CITY CSA 152 annual revenue for administration.

3. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date the Agreement is approved by the COUNTY. This agreement duration shall be for a period of five (5) years from the date of execution and with two (2) two-year renewal options subject to the written consent of both Parties.

4. WITHDRAWAL FROM AGREEMENT. Either Party may terminate this Agreement thirty (30) days after submitting written notice to the other Party. In the event termination becomes effective, termination shall constitute forfeiture by the terminating Party of its share of costs and administrative fees paid as described in Section 2 of this Agreement up to the effective date of termination. The terminating Party shall be responsible for all lawfully assessed penalties as a consequence of termination.

5. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGREEMENT. This Agreement may be amended by mutual consent of the Parties to the Agreement. No amendment to this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the duly authorized representatives of the Parties.

6. GOVERNING LAW AND SEVERABILITY. This Agreement will be governed and construed in accordance with laws of the United States and the State of California. Any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and the provisions of such laws and regulations, the latter shall control. If any provision or provisions of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the validity, legality, and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired hereby.

7. CONSENT TO BREACH NOT A WAIVER. No term or provision hereof shall be deemed waived and no breach excused, unless such a waiver or consent is in writing and signed by the Party so waiving or consenting. Any consent by any Party to, or waiver of, a breach by the other Party, whether expressed or implied, shall not constitute consent to, waiver of, or excuse for any other different or subsequent breach. 517

Updated 09/2024
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

8. APPLICABILITY OF PRIOR AGREEMENTS. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter; all CSA 152 prior agreement, representations, customs, usage, statement, negotiations, and understandings are superseded hereby.

9. HOLD HARMLESS. Each Party shall indemnify and hold harmless the other party from liability or damages resulting from its own acts or omissions including those of its officers or employees in the performance of this Agreement.

10. AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES. The Parties warrant and represent that the individuals signing this Agreement on their behalf can and do bind the Parties to the terms of this Agreement.
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
518

Updated 09/2024
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed as of the day and year first above written.

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF BANNING
On behalf of CSA 152
_________________________ ________________________
Chairman, Board of Supervisors City Manager, Douglas Schulze Approved as to Form Approved as to Form
County Counsel City Attorney
BY______________________ BY______________________
ATTEST: ATTEST:

Clerk of the Board Administrative City Clerk
BY_____________________ BY_____________________
G:\CSA\CSA 152 NPDES\Admin Services Agreements 2025\City of Banning 519
520
521
522
RE.80LUT10B OF THE CITY COONCIL 07 ~HE CITY 07 BANWIBG
BBTT:IlfQ B..I..TEA POll. iC:OUJfT'i 8 ERVI:C B Alt n 1 !ii :2 • TO l"UMD CITY~s NATlQl(AL POLLUTAN1' DISCHARGE ELIMIBJ,.TIOK BYSTEII (lfPDl:8> PROOUX
WHER.EM 1 th~ coun~y of Riv~rside, by it~ Re~olution No. 9]-4~4 adopted December Z l r 151 '9 J I a:n11e'.li.'.1Bd the City of Ela nn iri,g to its county service Ar~a (CSA) 152 8t the City'a r~qoest to meet the Environme~t~l PrD~ectian Agency 1 s requirement to obtain opQrating perm.its for discharges .fram storm drain. ,e;;ye-tems and to pay tor anticipat~d p~oje~~ costs that place~ an a~5ess=ent on prop~rty own~rs' t~x bills ~o fund expenditures required by tho permit, and WBBR:D.B 1 City ~t~ff has estimat~d th~ storrowater management pl"'cgra11:1 .l"'@:qui:r-~111.@ints will cost the City approx il"Clately $53 t 60-0 annually; and
WHD!U , a II Be:n e.t it Ass ess:me-n t Unit 11 i :s defined in. the River a i cle Co\lnty F 1 ood Control and w a te:r c-ons-erv at 1 on Di :s:t.r i ct Ma~ua1 1 ~he por~ion of ~hich defining Benefit ~sse~~nent ~nit is attach~d as ~li.hibit l an.d by this refeTence ~~de a part hereof; and WBER.D.B, this City council has determin.ect, based on ~taff's calculations, that &nnual ~ssessments are anticipated to be $4T7~ per Benefit Asssssment Unit.

Mo•1 THERBFORB BE IT RESOLVEC by the City Cou~cil of the City Qf Banning th~t the annual ass~ssment rate for fisoal year l994-9S for CSA l52 - Banning i~ hereby set ~t $4T72 per Benerit Ass~ss~~~t Unit.

PA.8 S.J::C I APDOVED, AN:O ADOP'l"!D
th:.~ -~itlj d"J of KDr:,t.
~~~~1-L=---
r lifornia
523
~TTEST:
"&~ - .~._J)~~½~
L~cille M. Eli~ondo '
City Clerk of the City Of
Banning. California
APPROVED AS TO FO.RN!
.AND L CONTENT
Joh/ . Wil~on, Esq.
city 11.ttorney

CERTIFICATION
I.. L~c:il le M. Elizondo, C:i ty Clerk ot tha City of Banning t Califo~nia, do hereby certify that the for~going Re~olution No. 1994-28. w-as duly ~d.opted by the City counc:i 1 of the city of aanning, California, ~ta Reg~lar Meeting the~eof held on the 22th day of March, 1994, by the following vote, to wit;
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Counc~Tmambe~~ AnQ~rson, Lewis~ Wi1li~~s~ Mayfrr Reyno1ds Co :m c: i T rnernbe r- Sm1 th Non"='
None
-2-
~ _J;~ 1-"'k..& /4uclfu M. Eli~ondo
• City Cle-rk. 1 City ot Banning
California
524
1 • • • • I • • J . J1 I" 11 • I • I • •• "." li'-"I' ." I Q:llP1NIIGI ~o. ~71, alJ"J'IDBiiJ ?OR cs.a.~
"!'he purpa EH! t, i t. hi !.l: i:..::irdi nane• is to ~i III t.ati 1.i ~ h .::i. '!,:Ix ~"!Jaure r. Dr "t ne I evy ,1nd collection ~t cn~r-g@a tor e~tenaeci gOV€1rll.mentai ~ervic~ p~ovidcd in : ~• ~ 11 n t. y ! 1-,'!ZV i..,c: e areas . undl!! r t hj! au 1: r.o.r it y o.t t: he County s el.."'V"ice I..r,e.a wv ~s 3et !or~~ in Gove~n!ll8nt ~ooe 5ecti0n l~J10+l et. seq. T~ chargee e~tablisbed hP.~under Hhall be l~v;~d ta p~y in wnoJ~ er part. the coBt ~f ~.1:i:-V'iding- a;uct c.ct.eqded. gi:iv.rnm&trt~l i;i:.::.cv ie-it~.

B_~H'U l'l" M:P:!H HN52T UHl~ .. (DAV) D!CrnPPWIP AllD NK'l'!lopm.oor •~·he .i;:i o, i!!' l!l :sJ11an t c: cm.pu.tation Ii:lli;!!'t.,h.Qd.olo~ 'i cidopted. f :;::t" ":.:!:l,i a CS.A i• t ha BALI :.i..t h.O<i .J.-ve l tlpea by ~l.! ve~~ id• ..;ou.n.t y F 1 uud C-on. 't. r cl n lr; t. t:-ict r Thi~ IC.E!lt~oo spr~ads th~ total asees~t to pan:::e1s witQin tho bmt@~~t ,i,l,:i,.1111 ~!!'JI !!il:m.en.,:. ..u-e-a in propo.IT..i,.on to eaii:h p;;&-" ~•d ' ~ rune f f • RQ.11.Q ff iEli Lill!:tormi.1110:d by tir:et .lcnowinq a. pare~l • s ::Ji:e in -1::11ereg it.s .pre:i;unt lia.nd ;,,ia e ( blC ident i al - Cc.,ai11111~l (.:! i ;1 l ~ l nd.u :!lt:r i:a.1 1 c..::tc- + J "'n.d t~-&n aas-i~Riag a runoff fM,1;t,;;1,- t. u i t..m. g ll:~ra.i l :iind U•• c • t,i;;iqq ry ~ Rt1noi f f &c-tora ara ~~ti.ma.tea of h~ mu.~h ~alnfnll ~Mn~ ~ff~ pa..rcEi ln ~map~riaon to ~he ,:),-=:i;:iur.t of t:a.1.nfall that .±a.11 on a pa.rc:&l. ln other -..rord., tho :r:-unci:ff f .1eti::i-r i.1. ~ lili'ay of -P.xpre !!'JI~ inq th• t:e l Iii ii.. .i vt~ Ll~ ree of .i.uiyy,:, Y loiu enc & s o:f pl! rc-1! 1:s with dif rerc-nt l:1.nd UH-ii r Pav~ aM i.mprO"t.Nii!d pa.re-el• h.av. r~~off factors closer to 1~0 (wha~~ l~O qquala 100, runc±f) than d~ u n p.!!ved or unimproved parce.l;!!!' . R.mic ing the la.rge ntl:ftlbitr of l and n 5-e'!I in l l,11'.1 C-a uQty to :s iJ:; gi,r..e.ral G"at.er;JQri "" f a-r:: e Elitima:tin.g nanoff under th:e 1-,nefit aaBeae.ant pn;icl!du~ pxO"l"'id~• ford Il'lllna~ai5ble Gild rtH11aonable cga:;ip~t~LiQQ :in,sthoor
r\,~ ~he National Pollut..tJ,..nt Dlsehtu;q~ Klimination Sy~te~ !NPDES} P~QlgL.f:llil ~ddition~l t~~o~ hav~ h@~n br::0nght in to ~he a.n.aiyai5 wnich cona.ider ,:.;. hit, t. ype o:f a.ct i v.i ty oc. t h.&t .laud u•~ . 'fhi s ti,.roqrillR ,i,. ;c11quirlltd by .Fic-d.eral Riegull!I t; i1:m t c- f C>C"ns i t11 attention on urbi!ID.i :t:l!!d i!lrei!I& or d~v~lerpmeirtto a:n:d. to ~~eluck! ~~ic~ltu~Al propertiea. T~e;t"f;!!fQ6e &g:s; i cul tu.ca 1 .inid. ,,, .w.on t. und~Vflllr:-pt!lld. proi:iertie:e hl!IVC: been cc.,mpl a.tit! l:, -:-:: :.e.Dp-t ed f ;r;Qm a e: 1J@1l!!u!lments @'lr'E!! r:: ~hou,gh t: hey obv i O'll.l!lil y ;nay ll,l!!lvr;!I sUDl!!II !lll'lount of cupcff_
Tha CC>.m£lutation ◊f th~ aa•••aat11~~ f~r a.ny parc6l i~ b~od on the nu:aibe~ e,f BAIJ18: .a. ■ 1i:iqn ad. to that pan:-el. A .sic.(] le-f ami.l y re:aidant i.ll.l :pari=:cl. of 7,ioo ~qua.rB re&t (1/6 acre) in si~e Yith a runoff f~cto~ ot ~.40 vaa s~le~tlll!PQ. ~~ tha starui.ar~ BAU. Th• naJU:1111tr uf BAUe for a~y oth.ec parcel ca11 hft ....--:ampll teci by :r.e lat. i.ngi it 11, s.i..%:11- ..!IL.mi 1.l!lind: u 51,e 'CD tha .BAU as of;lg i.c: r .1 bed under the headin,g ~ C"a!IIJ!lnta.t: ion of TJni ts I:~ E:ill.C'h [' ill'Clllll'" ~ Aljla.i.11, t..11.11- p~i;i:n;:iipl• i.a.volvwd. L• :i-r,l~ti:aq 1111 t.oaii ruag:f f to t.M- aPQ11at. of .i.ape~i.ou:1111 ~• p~••11t. ( aic:t.~l 4...,...,1,oped aoniiA?) a J.
525
I, • I" i.u • I_I . • II I . I . : ..:....,._. ..... _._.

The ~....bl~ Lo~ow Gr.owD ~he~,;...~ ~~~8~Qcico ~c l~ng u~c~ G.:lQ~~ ~~~~c~iv~ =unoff =actor~ at'lri the ~AU pex uc.u-.

IIJIRti il!a.llSm8~ WITS
,~------------~-----~-----~-~------~---
1 GROUP 1 t J\N n 1,~'R FAC'?OniPER AeJ{E
I A 1 Camme:cci.al .. _ Irtdu.etr:la l
~ ~part.!aent5/Mobi~e Hean!!! Far~~~Chnrch~g,Sebaolc
I
~ Sinqle-f.u\..ilv P~~identul
0 Pault.r-vrirrigated/Cultivatied. ~toD~,
Li'7EIBtock~Vacant UnQ.CV•loped
I!: Golf ~aU:t"!!Je.-S • 1•:ri v~te Pl!llr kB
f" Pa.rec.la- with Mi.ll!Pc ~ i.l an,oou.a .S t.r';.lctl.1rl!!!':is UlVLEI
CIOUP ~ - CQIIKIKC:IAL /IKDU:11:t'lll:IJU.
"i.and Utle i:.:ooeEi: C 1 - Comm.ere ia1 1Jr-opert:i.lills

0.:80
r,_ ~o
! o~ 40
0-rOU
o~oo,n
0,003.:)
CL - Commercial Hui~d..i.:nqs on ieaEietl 1.a...c.a.

GROUP 8 - A,f'U.1!111:r.--t"-8 1111 /dla.1L& !IOMIJ .PA:aPi., C:IIURCEE8 • SCIIOQL5 I.~nd u ~e cadlll • : CA - A.[)l!!,rt 1IU:tnt Bu.i ldl ng:, \ 4 fJr mo;i;- s: un..i I. s l Cl - Chu. .. ~h...-111;
HP - llnbi.le Elcme Rental .E"u-k , 3 nr mare J.:n.i t~ ~ Rl - Ap,e,rtiNn~ suildinga t4 o~ :ir:,o~~ unit~!
SC - S~haola
0-ltDlJll' C ~ S llfGLZ-rAittL'I ftES"IDD'I' [Ali
Land UAe cod.ea : Alt - Aqr i-cu.l tu.r~l Ree idant.i,1],J. 0 .. 10
0 .. 05
CR - Sin~l-e-Pa.mily Rc~idcnti~l ~, or ie•• unit~)
Mr I.ndivid.ualiy owned p&-re~l with n.obile hamc::i
.HO - Indivi~ually r;,,m,.d p~~P-1 ~ith :r=io:bil~ ~a.

MP - Nobila Hone on lsa6Rd. 1~.:t.

PR - R..aeidantul on a~ricult~ra.1. pr~~e.rv~
Rl - Sin~ie-~a.m.i1y R~sid•ntial
R2 - RaB~dential t2 or 3 un~~c~
~c ~ CQndomJ.n.i.um.a w~eh priv4la ~nL.c:y
RD - Cond.csi.nLums with common ant.r:i. 9
RI - SingJ.e-,t-"mn.i.1 y .Ne !Ii ~:nt: i a 1
rut - :nd.i vi du.al. l y ,ownoo mub.i 1 liill h0att lot. [-rn - S i n9 l II;!'-!'"t\lllil y .t-i:e~~~t: ia 1
RX - Rxc:::eptiDnal ~~~ident~al
GROUP R - GOLP COURU,. PRIVATE PUKB
Liana U~~ ~Qde~~ C5 - CelM!t~~~~~ {B~cludiu~ nQR-p~0fit) GC - Go 1 f -.~-aura~
GR.OUP ,- - PAaCBLS ,r1n xracrnn:ooa s~
Lat1.d. U:!!!f!I Code:!! :: AS - 1lacl!l.nt with .m.i:l!!I ce llan•cn.1:m: !iitrnctar e Y'S - l.4I.1.-c! with ;,d• i;-..-11 aneott u tit :c-u:t=tl.l.:c-c i;-n 1 y i::XAl!rpi e::s :i: old f 0'Llndat i-01111 , p(mp hou:1e :s or :!; hoed iii; 1Tot. .i.o ue-o526
..• ,. . • •. I ' I •• · .. I •• I • I - •=...:....:.I • .

CQ.HPUT.MI Pl: Qf YIU.S f"Oa .t"'-WU PA..Y'J!:
;:.!i- -i:::rev i.uui.. iy :!Jt.-c."t-ea, t.h¥ .RAU l :II tb.,e, p;cuportiono:t.-e n.:i:nQ;ff :frOJ:L &. ain.gi11tf.!l.l!!Lly 1~£id~nLiai ~~rc•l with~~ «~•a oi l/5 (~.171 ~cce. O~huc aiz~ ~:.a~c~l~ ~rw J~~d us~ c~t~iv& ~ill haY• .multip!~~ 9L ~be b~¥i~ u:-i.it+ Or:e l 1 } Unit -= t O. 1 ·1 A.ere J X ( S 1 ri,;1 Qo-F a.mi ly .M:&llil id 1iii1 n. t.ia l Ru.no! f .t·actor I
OI:"p
For ~~ i :mp l : c-i ty .::i.11 ~ ihig:.::_ t.:: - ! a.au.I y ril!!!'ll!!I ident.i.a.l 1,;il:. i:.;ipt'.! r t".ii:!111 reqB rdl!!!:.SS -of ~i%~ h~vn be&n ~~s~gned l B~U.
'rM numb~r ,.;if. a.ase:r:: :IUN:n.t. unit. B
ta.mi 1 y D!!!1u.ch11 n tial l a.r-g-lil.r tb.a..o
folloving ~quation:
f o.:c All pa.re"'-= l. $
,j. l 7 .l.cr-&Ei I i:a ( c;:,th.e-r t.b4tl; s iCl.c;l.lEI - det.e:rmt:n111Pd by t.n..

N~r o t Uni t.5 - ( A,r, e:~ o1 P&rC@l__ln ~.r•I t x £ R\,LQOf f F-Gc_:t:_or; l ()n fl t~a:1111 .1.c .A s:s:&& &lllE!n 1:. uni. t
~Q-.;;i;p A ;I: (;~r-cial ~ l~uatri al.

Rn.no££ ra~l.Qr - ~.ijO
nAU!ill • ( Area of Pa.:ccial O~"'l¢p,Qd I x 12 DAU/ Aere Orou.p B :i: ~111t-'1 t Nal::il.9 ._, Pa.riu., Cb.urc,.li,e11-, 8Cll:COJ..a kunof t :t:a:ctor - -0. lliQ
JlA.Us • ( A.r"!td of Parce,L Deve iop:i:,,i l X '1 BAU/ A.c:::re O.raup C ~ Sii:Lgi.e-Pa..i ly H-iii!I-Ual
.Runoff FiltC'tDr ~ 0.40
.B.A~e • (.11 Al':l.re•i X ~ BAU/Mte
.POul~.E"]', 1rrigat.d cropa. ::-altivatlliHil ~o~•, aairie•, L.iv•at~ ~!i1Vd.im9 rll'da. V.a.c:am~ und•••loped
iHH:i!".11 t Fa.e"t.or = 0. {10
BAOa = {1.00
G.vu:; IS.: CklJ.f Cou..r8-a ■ , :P:riY•t• Pan:1
RunQff Eactl).r • OrOg67
BAU& = (Are.a. of .r.a:rc:1111 DBVsl u.p,ad l X CJ . IO RAU/ Ac r 1111 i:.1:s,;11,1.p f': Pa.re• ls w.i. t:lb. m.i:acaila:DeOU• •truct111 ~• R~~ciff Fa~t0r • o~~Oll
rum~ • ( Ar~a. of Paree l o~ 2..cp~ l x □ _ O:'!i R.Jl,tl / Aer@ T"
527
• ._ I-_._ ,1 _. _L,. r • I 1 I 1-.".J •. I 11 1 I I . I .U:... !QlU:1.11 9t' :CXfICJLL ~B.Mlll'S
A.35L,Jtu:::; i\ l ,o • 0 .acre ~-oaatll re i al Ii nd.L.l.~ t: t: i al pa.r"1 el ...-.1th A. d~'WI toped a.t:cu, of ~ . o ~e~e:s wh i.:::h l:a:s: a 8AU rat.• o t. S 4 • O C p,r 'Y'C i::tr:
?-.'o 4 of :BA'Us ... ~ Oev'l!-J.op@d Fa.:r.ii;:1:11 Area) X 1. i .aA "D / .:\crll!' • a X 1~ = ~6 ilAOS
~berefor~, th• ~&ae~sma~t ~Qa1Q li,w!;
ASSUM!:
96 BA.U~ i S4,00/-SAU - $lS~~aO pe+ vea~
Pu-Jes (Qz-Qup ►
A iOa~ acre l'llOhiie home park witn a d~va~oped 4:rca 0£ a.o acros ~bi~b haa a BAU rat~ Qf $4aO0 '.EJ'B.r ye~~
Ho. ~f BAU~= <De~•lcpod. P~t:t.:e1 Are~) X j BAU/Ac;::re z S.O ~, ~ ?2 BAU& T.a,erefore, ~ho •s~sae~r.~ ~~~ld b~~
72 HA.Us~ ,~~/SAU = S2B8.GO Ptlr Yfta~
l ~ RtliOutial { G~p C!,
ASSOMK:= A 10,~ 4Clre ~inqle-fam..ily ~•aidential paTcAl u Vhi..c:h MB 4 MU ratt! of S4~u0 per ~a~~
tio • ci f .BAU-u - C o . 1 ·, iu::r,ii,• , X 6 UAU / Ac r:t':. • 0 . 1 "l ,:: 6- -:: 1 RAU
·i·ti.eret ore.. the as:1.-• ~t 'liicold b•::
1 DAU X S4.0O/BAU ~ S4.0C per year
4, f:W~ltry. Irrigatlfd C~cpt. Cµltiyated Crop•, n•lu••~ :t.iu•ts,c.k. Vacant. Up4ftl:1:1Pnsl ( Group D-)
ASSmnt;: A 1 a • Cl ll!it:re P D1J 1 t.::r;y parc!al wb ic:b ::..iii.A :-.■ rei:!r:iaasndad iY.,U c,. t.o of $4.00 per yeor4
~o , o.f BA.Os = ( .oevel0pea Pa;s;c...,l lU"oa l .x. o ~u / Ac.re ~ lD.O XO - 0 RAU&
?hereforer the aese~~aent would be:
0 UAU X St,00/:6.AU: $0.00 per year
528
I • I ._ . ,• •J I I . .. I • I I .. - .... I I r1 I I I . ._IL. s ~ col :f :C:PiUf:!l k ;:ariyata i"ar.k.111_ c t;L"Ou.p £) ~ lOrO a~r~ G,:.,lf CQU~~~ or ~rtvate ~ar~ W~th ~ dev~lopeci c1.rei!II CJ ~ u . u .c1:c.;: • I..! a-: ..., i'1: ~ c.b hal!I a .rec-i::amend~d IlAJl .-a t.e a:f ~ 4 . 0 G par y~a.r:;:
~o + ·-..J f BAUi; = ~ Devl!l loP1!"ri ~~ roe l At'ea } x. u L l ll B.n.ll / kra = 840 X 0.10 = 0.80 n.AU~
'L'her.,f r;;i,.411 , t b.e o:1.s s.e:s:smeo t. 111~ld b1t:
oLa~ BAUs X $4.Cg/MU - Sl~20 pee year
A 1a.o a.o~~ p,iicecl witb 8.o MreB of old lV'Und~tiona, or pump h¢1l11•• n.gt ooaupit1d t')r bain~ u•11:id whi&h he.:11 ,1, .-~nde-d. BAU rat~ of S!~nO ~£ year,
Ne • of .BA.Us • { nev•J.opaa. P-a..rot!!!l A.rlNI ) i:: Ct + 0 S IiALF / AQ~e - 8.0 X Or05 ~ -40 BAU~
Tl-.erefore 1 ~he Q~~u~3~cnt -wcald t:J,,e:

O ~ 4 0 BJ\Ua x $ ii • co/ RAU 1111 $- l. t:i O p~:i- yftar Th~ KMBBwument 3ystem. is de•igne-d. to id~ntify ~n.d. ec:apute a.a••-~~ u:n. '"'~PICI.L'" propert .i.Q!I c lo&e ly meeting t. bo:s~ l~d ~ ee d••er iption• . How r tha BJ!lltam i• flexible ~~o~g~ t.o acc~mm.adate ~it~tia~~ w.tu.ch rlo n~~ m&et the a~erage or typical JAlild ~8~ wi~hi..:i the a cateqo.z:ie!jl:, In thas• inatl!!lOC~5 ~z:IC':lnlo.- RULSS-~ have~~ eat&blisn•d to ~rO?"ide .a c::1C:rn;; i &tlB.,l;lt. ~t; hDd lu , 1\1'~ 1:iia t• t hDli!ia pr(lperti 1..u11 .. 1 . RV P&t' ks havinq i~~ s~n.1 l uccu~t i.on 'lifi 11 ~ve- l!I. !i 0% reduct.ion rate. appJind. to tn~ ~alcuJ.ated as,oc*:ruiin~
2 r .E1fen t:t.tough .1g r ie~l t:u.ra l p.!1.rca J :g: r11:r@o 1111D!!impt ~ ;t1.in'S le-ta.ail y rC'Gi1.fou t.la1 un.i t on • .,,n agrt.eul t ur~..L pa.rc!r3l i e: ;;iot examp't ~nci. will b11;11 aeaeBBed at t~o normal ~ingl~-faaily ~eaident~al ~•l~ulation .3 ~ JU::. va.c:an t /undavl!:! loped l .1utd i !!'I ~.xe:mpt: regard,l••• ot t.h.a .land use e¢d.• 4 • All. ai,g~ ic u l .._:i.:i:.1. a.1. pa.:t"tie.1.a. .llQ ~t., packing IEi.n@d:ll O:t' sto:t"agit1 bu.ildi~q_. ti.•fil in c:ot1jUnQt.i.on witli th111 oit"w'ricultural dc::'t:i.v:i.t.y :a.~ ~x,amp,t
S • I :Qdian Fedora.l 1il!nd G .-..n.d Bt.u:·e-atJ a f Land Mana~BIQIIJD-t land~ a.z::111 ozampt., bmiiavei; I~ l.i.nd• l ll;!!l!l•~ t:o non-I .ad.ian azi.ti t.Lu; wi lb. a t.rnc t.iires ar11 not ex-ampt
529
.-••." I . . " 1 '-1 . I • ,1,._. ,. ". 1 I 1• 1 •.·.· 1··1•"-l_i LL " 0 I • 11-I •• ,,
MLQCJU:UJU rstl -r.?PICAL CM 1~; 81-JY!:Hln' ort
= a~ ~roµi.;: r r.:. y civnl!"!r:,. ~h~ f oe.l 1. hat tha i r par~ol doe-s not .m.~~ ~- t.h~ 'tTJ;il..i.ca 1 si t1;1.a. t ion I a t:iy Bt~ f 0-r iP:v-a.i 11a. tion h~,i; Le-en -ll:as ta.bl i e:hea ~ l f:t i ng t.h• J. ollowlng Sample f'"o;r;:m to t."l!!!'-P.Va lua t:411 -' pr-op.tty CJlr{D'llr I B CSl,i,

15.2 i:J.IJ 15-eB eimen t , City i:. taf :t :1b00.ld t1 [email protected] if tba ~ •h•:am111nt i • i:ncor t c:::i;,; l by ..c•v l.Erwi..ciq afl!lri6l ?,nct-o s or hy field. fa::i.~pec-t..i.cm l.f neeefl:••ryT
'l'h• irtVi!II l 1.1ation f-OPII i.::: ou ld ~ p:r°"igad to th. §J.1 os:rt:1.rcy owner by tM.i.l or inada availahla at tne ~Q~n~ar. 'l'he ~op h-lf Qt tu f~~m (Prope:tty Int~tioPI ean bo complated by ~h• ~ropcrr.y mmer ~ftd! mailed b&c.k to statf o~ ~~fo:r:zatiQn ~an be gatti~red hy ~~aff ove~ the t&lBIJhoo•~ ~h~ Mt'.tt'.lm half ot: th-I! far.11111 i!il: fcir -at•ff use to Tec:or,;f tht: infDaJ6t.ion a.bout t.h.e propi,r:t:y gAth,a:reri du.ring th-1!11 eva.l -u:,1 t ior. whi~ ia n8G!e:s~ tQ d-eterm:i ne j f "' c or roic-c &d aaBBBl!llaiietn.t i m: ne,c c-21sary. '0\l••tio.aa ratJU"d.i.a.gl th.41 .r-e-eyaJ.u.at.J.ara ~roeed11:11ra DaJ' .ba ofii~e,i t:.1;1 a .:r1:11d.7 flat t.•r lCIIIHi
( H9) 21 !w-llitNJI
:Spae.:lal Pt"Ogztalb il!llik:f: .4.oa
-.1 ni:t-aJ.de ca..-ty l:"nm:lllpori.a:t.i~il Dapa..rtmi11:1. t Coapl•tClld (o;raa a~uuld htll ~ltad to:
fU......-•id• CC)lm.ty h-aa•P9-1'1:,atioa O.p&~t
1695 S)race S~N•t
R:!. va-.ra:.ii:ie , ca 9':Z!iio7
•~~~t J-1lcl~ wa~t•rl~IUI
530
. .... I • 1° I . ., . • • I .1·• "-· L .... I • ._ ' • • ,:sa 1s:2
ASS~SSM..IQr.r :8.E-EVALUATlON
.A.5S~5SOR PARC~L NO•----~----
FOB s:w:::, YU OllJ,J
.. .. ..:....:.u ...... _.

CATB ____ _
~ARCEL ~lmA~ ____ ....._AC....,. • ...._ DEVBLOPED AC'RH&iE~-----......:;A~C~1:...- PRO.f.E:RTY EV.ALUA".l"IOfi =. .ABJUAJ. :PR'OTO ·---~ SITE VISIT' ___ ~-- P~OF!RTY OBSCRII'TION/COt4MENTS __ ~_
ass:e;s§MEN!: ~T.A
8A.O / 111 TJKVKLOPl!J[I ~ $ RATE
AC!l.B AC.RB.ACE /Mu
I: ;
:I I I ! i I
r I
,
l i
[. I
I - - . - -
• L '-
I
-
Rl!!:COkMm'IDED CORPJICT!D AS ~fi.SSNE"NT _,c....__----~ CSA 152 t1JJtD IIUIIILD.
• APPROl:IMTE DBWLOPE.D ACRKAGE ROIJ'ND!:D TO T~ ~ST HlJJtDiUI IJT"I FOR "1'1"I6 CAI.CULA.'rZ:Olf.

QUXSl'IOllS R.KCAR.D:nfG 'I .B!.S ASSESSMf!N'I' 1 l"'lrBASE C0Ni'I'1'.C'l' ::

I
531
" I I • • .J - .. . , ,, I ~:. .:.li.J'"4 J . J I • • J. i'B:OCIIS!IlfG g,a .15,2 :.asumonn RB-rmw,:nOlfd :nqt'!I ::io_ "cltOnRn ;u STNIIBIS,fiT5 BS.Jll'G HJUJ.,lm { Batara sapt~r, :t.} l:'l!Cl-~v,lua.tion t~ :.ib.oii.l.!J Lrc~ 1·.ub.nittc-d to tho 5pecial Frcql.uae 5oation uf the- ~r,;,1,.mty 'I'ran.sportatior;i L)e~'.lliJt:"t..l'ICnt". p: i .. n · Lu p.ro~ct._y l.1x: :1:Jtatenents tioei n~ m.111 i I nd ( priei= t.D S Rpt.111.11.bt!!r l c.:t .l iv~""'r.:y year) • l'bol!!!I ~pproved corrt:JC t.l.on~ to the as ll'i S lilN.n"tt wU l o~ upd.a t~ to ~h~ ~omptlt• r data .ba•e a1!!1!!1,1!!!SBlourn~ nile& prior t-:i ~•n.•r11tii,n t:>! ;:cc!pe~tv to:1.X statesl4'Ma. Tb.•r. i.!3 na :=.hargra fc-r corr.etiecu: irtade ~rior to ,:.!,:,11..a.-eri~e e,t prop~rty tn statsmsnt:s.

PJl(l;QSJlfG C,I 152 Ml:l~MA:J M-mLUU'RIWS 1l,na PltftlU'J TN SD.'l!DIIRffl 3PW MI\IUID
Re-ev4l11.ation fODEi!I i:;u.bnri.tted. t.o t.be Special PrDICJram& Section after p~rty tax et.&tan:snt:e have bND m..iled 'lrill be fr;;,rnirded to the COUflty A1,1d i tQr-.-Con troll~ • s off ice for proc 1n; Bin9. '!'be lwd.i tor C'ontroJ.les:- will 1111!111.k.e the eo:n-C!c-t ion to ths pz::~rty ~ :;tat9lllen t. u B inig one a f tvo 1Mthods; 1) isB1.1e a r-~i59'd prcp-erty tax lflita.tBment I.Jr 2 l iBeoe a .:r:'Elfm:ld c ~ec k . The co.rrac:t ion to t b• ecm:put.9.r. r:LiitA bl!ll.1.n ;an nmnm:ie nt rel 11:t!J will. be roade by th~ Special. P.rogt'4llm: s~t io:n prior tu- Ui.e nlllXt t~ y~.z: ..

Mthod 1:

If 1/2 o~ tha proparty tmcaa w.r• paid on the tirst in~tll.llm.entr tho AU.d.itcr CoDtzalle.r ~ill is•ue a revised proptirty tu stata=ent $bc;-.i~g th~ '.::ilecond. in au 11..JnA:!int. bail llDce reduced by the d.if fer em::-• bet wen t:fte ~Qt~4l ~~•e~1n1ent ~nd tne ~ec:~ corruotiixi ~-~~01K1nt+ TIie vropcr ty o,wncr 111 i 11 ;l cit :.,.ee :} reiduc t icfL .i.c::: th ill ,tc t al <"...SA 1 S.l c1.asea:1!uc.e:ci.t on t..ho revifl:ed t.~ ~tate:ment, ,:.he only ne>ticel!I.Ple d.if fe.rence will be in th• ~•~and inst~ll.mt!nt balan~D due.

Mlt.b.ad 2:
1 f i:. he pfi>iia.i: t . .Y r. au:a& wBCe pa.id in ".: b.11:ir e:nt.i rot. y c1io UIII!!! .r ;u::, t. inet-a.1.1..meTit and ~hn di~fercnco bstve~n the actual ~nK~n~~~ ~mi the .recollllll.8:nded corrected -ul!lal!!l1n!lllllE!nt (!XC'eed.s S 10. DO th,~ J\1.tdit.cr Control .... tll itJIIIUI'! 111 r""lt:Uf'ld ~hec-)l to the p:COpi!!rty owner. This :Ql,lil,l' t.ak• &nywil•~- [~~ J t.Q ~ ~th~ tQ oi:eu~. m&c.b. z-..,.i..-.d :P-E'OIP•ftr ~ •-t-~a.~ ea~ N f ~ ebeek PRK:&•11 N by t•• h4itcn- &:r.nt.rc,l l•r wi lJ. coat $1:5. 00 w.b..iah -.rill be ~ to tM CD%r811paad.iD.1J CSA 1 !2 fmsd D1Dlilar.
532
'I" 11 • _ -•1 • -r L .- 1 • I 1,. .J Ir- -l_i ,.•_I I • l'tl I L • _ •• I S~mple~
i
i

2. 1 7 Acre ~a r-cel

UNDEVELDPED
(NOT ASSESSED)
• E'ASJC UNIT
1 ciAU
douse {BAS~C UNIT 11G acre) - 1 BAU
:
-
1 /6 ACRE ;::: .1 7
ACRE
1 BAU X BAU RATE= S ASSESSMENT
533
" . •1,t 1 • ,1 • ,1 .•.III . . . i_ .- 1 ""I '4 . J I I I ; • -1 I • • • :i..:........:.. .r_. • • U:":"'

COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL
' - ■
.. _ -
SA~JJPLC:

UNDEVELOPED
10 ACnES
(NOT. ASSESSED}
. '
DEVELOPED . . .
12 BAU / ACRE X 5 ACRES DEVELOPED ~ 60 BAUr S
so BAU X BAU RATE ~ $ ASSESS~iENT
I .. - I
, ■
...
534
Resolution No. 1994-107

APPROVING ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR CSA 152 PROGRAM BETWEEN THE CITY OF BANNING

AND RIVERSIDE COUNTY
W~EREAS, Section 402(p) of the Federal Clean Water Act requires municipalities to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit before discharging stormwater into the waters of the United States; and,
W~EREAS, County has formed CSA 152 to finance a portion of its programs and obligations associated with the municipal NPDES permits and individual General NPDES Permits; and,
W~EREAS, cooperation between County and City in the administration and implementation of the NPDES Permits is in the best interests of County and City; and,
W~B, ERP~%City was formally annexed into CSA 152 by County Resolution No. 93-454 on December 21, 1993; and,
W~EREAB, County and City are to perform certain duties prescribed in this Agreement that will benefit all parties;
uc/ill& M. Ellzondo ~
City Clerk
OW, T~{ FORE, ER~.B~. IT RESO~. DV~.by the City Council of the City of Banning that the attached Agreement labeled Exhibit "A" be approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute the agreement.

PA,,~. D, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 27th day//of September, 19~4.

APPROVED AS TO FO.RM
Joh~ ~F. W&lson
Cit~ Attorney
535
536
Exhibit " A"
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR CSA 152 PROGRAM

BETWEEN

RIVERSIDE COUNTY AND CITY OF BANNING
This Agreement, entered into as of this day of 1994 by the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, hereinafter called "COUNTY", and the CITY OF BANNING, hereinafter called "CITY", establishes the responsibilities and obligations of each party concerning the management and financing of COUNTY SERVICE AREA 152, hereinafter called "CSA 152".

RECITALS
WHEREAS, Congress in 1987 added Section 402(p) to the Federal Clean Water Act CWA) [33 U. C. S1342(p)]; and,
WHEREAS, Section 402(p) requires certain municipalities, construction and industrial facilities to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit before discharging stormwater into the waters of the United States; and, WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY have obtained or will obtain a municipal NPDES Permit for each of the three watersheds of the County; and, WHEREAS, COUNTY has formed CSA 152 to finance a portion of its programs and obligations associated with the municipal NPDES Permits and individual General NPDES Permits; and,
WHEREAS, cooperation between COUNTY and CITY in the administration and implementation of the NPDES Permits is in the best interests of COUNTY and CITY; and, WHEREAS, CITY was formally annexed into CSA 152 by COUNTY Resolution No. 93-454 on December 21, 1993; and,
WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY are to perform certain duties prescribed in this 537
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Agreement that will benefit all parties;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:

1. DELEGATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES. The responsibilities of each party shall be as follows:

A. COUNTY shall assume the responsibilities and meet the requirements of CSA 152 administration for COUNTY and CITY by:
1) Preparing CSA 152 budget and reports in compliance with County Ordinance No. 573.
2) COUNTY shall also:
a) Prepare the required narrative for said budget and reports along with COUNTY'Sindividual budget or report on COUNTY activities.
b) Annually prepare and forward to the appropriate agency computer tape information on individual assessments of parcels within CITY for generation of Benefit Assessment Units (BAU) totals and assessments for CITY.
c) Forward CITY corrections to assessments and tax bills to Auditor° Controller/Tax Collector.
d) Review and coordinate CITY CSA 152 budget with overall CSA 152 budget.
e) Reimburse CITY for actual expenditures incurred under provision of approved CITY CSA 152 budget and allocations.
f) Conduct mailing of proposed tax rate assessment for CITY for FY 94/95 and any year CITY requires notices. COUNTY shall bill CITY for these services at cost.
g) Provide to CITY annual property assessment printouts and a BAU 2 538
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
summary.
h) Provide to CITY standardized forms including but not limited to assessment re-evaluation forms, budget and expense reimbursement formats.
i) Serve as administrative and technical advisor on CSA budget preparation and assessment re-evaluations.
j) Assess CITY an annual six percent (6%) administrative fee on new revenue for CITY CSA 152 budget.
k) Be responsible to CITY for reasonable requests by CITY for information, billing tapes, data, changes, corrections, refunds, issuances of new CITY tax bills or revisions. Said requests will be at expense of CITY.
1) Conduct annual County public budget hearing of CSA 152. m) Assist CITY with first year CITY public information forum on NPDES program and CSA 152 administration by providing administrative and technical guidance.
n) Provide CITY with copy of CSA 152 budget prior to
submittal to COUNTY Board of Supervisors.

B. CITY shall assume the responsibilities and meet the requirements of CSA 152 administration for CITY by:
1) Preparing CITY CSA 152 budget and reports on its activities using COUNTY format, hereto attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. Said budget and reports shall be submitted to COUNTY for incorporation with COUNTY CSA 152 budget narrative and in accordance with Schedule of Events, hereto attached as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference.
3 539
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
2) CITY shall also:
a) Conduct NPDES and CSA 152 public forum for CITY constituents prior to COUNTY CSA 152 public hearing for new or increased CSA 152 assessment over prior fiscal year assessment.
b) Be responsible for CITY updates, corrections or revisions to be entered into COUNTY data base for CSA 152 or any corrections, revisions, refunds or issuance of new CITY tax bills through COUNTY at CITY expense.
c) Be responsible to COUNTY for any proposed tax assessment printing and/or mailings CITY may want COUNTY to perform at CITY expense.
d) Be responsible for replies to CITY taxpayer inquiries and requests for CITY CSA 152 budget information and NPDES Program within CITY boundaries.
e) Provide COUNTY with CITY telephone numbers and public forum dates for CITY taxpayer inquiries on CITY CSA 152 program and for inclusion on CITY CSA 152 assessment mailings or proposed assessment increases by February 15 of each year, and keep such numbers updated as necessary.

2. FEES AND PAYMENT. COUNTY shall administer CSA 152 for the benefit of COUNTY and CITY. CITY share of annual CSA 152 administration shall be a six percent 6%) fee of CITY CSA 152 annual budget.

A. CITY shall be responsible for payment to COUNTY, at cost, for services that require:
1) COUNTY to provide information, billings tapes, data changes, corrections, refunds, issuances of new CITY tax or revisions to CITY. COUNTY shall 4 540
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10:
11 12
13 14
15 16
18 19~
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 provide an itemized billing of completed work to CITY. 2) COUNTY to perform printing and/or mailing of proposed tax assessment rates of CITY assessed parcel numbers.

3. SHARE OF COSTS. In the event CSA 152 requires the services of a consultant, as mutually determined by COUNTY and CITY, to prepare manuals and/or perform studies such as, but not limited to, management audits and fiscal reports that are relevant to the entire CSA 152 boundary, the cost of said consultant services will be shared by COUNTY and CITY using the methodology of this Section.

A. Share of Cost Methodology. The individual percentage contribution from COUNTY and CITY shall be a function of population. Contribution shall be calculated as the population of COUNTY or CITY, divided by the aggregate total population of all CSA 152 members, thusly:
1) Contribution (%) = Xn/Xt
Xn = population of COUNTY or CITY
Xt = total population of all CSA 152 members combined.
2) The population of COUNTY, CITY and CSA 152 member cities will be based on the latest California State Department of Finance population figures issued in May of each year.

B. COUNTY shall keep CITY apprised and notified of COUNTY requests for proposal ( RFP), selection of consultant, consultant'sfee, any contract timetables and consultant schedule of payments.

4. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date the last duly authorized representative of COUNTY or CITY executes it. The term of the agreement shall be indefinite or as long as required for the Clean Water Act.

5. WITHDRAWAL FROM AGREEMENT. Either Party may withdraw from this Agreement thirty (30) days after giving written notice to other Party. In event withdrawal 5 541
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
becomes effective, withdrawal shall constitute forfeiture by the withdrawing party of its share of costs and administrative fees paid as described in Sections 2 and 3 of this Agreement up to the effective date of withdrawal. The withdrawing party shall be responsible for all lawfully assessed penalties as a
consequence of withdrawal.

6. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGREEMENT. This Agreement may be amended by mutual consent of the parties to the Agreement. No amendment to this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the duly authorized representatives of the parties.

7. NOTICES. All notices shall be deemed duly given when delivered by hand; or five (5) days after deposit in the U. S. mail, postage prepaid.

8. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement will be governed and construed in accordance with laws of the United States and the State of California. If any provision or provisions of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired hereby.

9. CONSENT TO BREACH NOT A WAIVER. No term or provision hereof shall be deemed waived and no breach excused, unless such waiver or consent is in writing and signed by the party so waiving or consenting. Any consent by any party to, or waiver of, a breach by the other party, whether expressed or implied, shall not constitute a consent to, waiver of, or excuse for any other different or subsequent breach.

10. APPLICABILITY OF PRIOR AGREEMENTS. This Agreement and the Exhibits attached hereto constitute the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter; all CSA 152 prior agreements, representations, statements, negotiations and understandings are superseded hereby.

11. HOLD HARMLESS. Each Party shall indemnify and hold harmless the other party from liability or damages resulting from its own acts or omissions including those of its 6 542
1 officers or employees in the performance of this Agreement. 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed as of the day and year first 3 above written.
4 CITY OF BANNING
5 ATTEST:
6 City Clerk
By
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 Mayor
Form Approved
County Counsel
BY
Deputy
City Manager

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
on behalf of CSA 152
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
ATTEST:

Gerald A. Maloney
Clerk of the Board
By
Deputy
7 543
BUDGET FORMAT*
CITY CSA 152 (NPDES)
FY

EXHIBIT A

APPROPRIATIONS
Storm Drainage System Inspection -
36" and larger)
Initial Inspection
Underground/Open Channel
Water Quality Testing
Document Violations
Inspection Preparation Plan
Updating Construction/
Facilities Drawings
Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) -
DAMP Preparation
Implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs)
Inspection Forms for Building/Public
Works Inspectors
Additional Catch Basin Maintenance
Additional Street Sweeping in Industrial/
Commercial/Central Business Areas
Administration of Volunteer Catch Basin
Basin Stenciling
Development of Grading Ordinance
Develop BMP Manual for New Development
Inspection of Construction Sites for
Compliance of Grading Ordinance
Testing of Sediment in Sediment Basin
Spot Inspection of Commercial/Industrial
Areas for Illegal Dumping
Education
Pesticide Training for City Personnel
Permit Training Requirements for Inspectors,
Plan Checkers, Engineers and Planners
Training for Review/Inspection of BMP and
Inspection for Illegal Dumping
Utility Bill Inserts with information on
Impacts of Fuel Spills, Illegal
Dumping, Erosion, etc..
544

Administration of NPDES Permit
Contingencies -
Other -
Legal Mailings
Assessor Line Item Charge
Riverside County Flood Control BAU computer time
Public Education Program ***
CSA 152 Administration Fee (6%)

TOTAL PROJECTED APPROPRIATIONS
Illustrative budget format. Line items may vary with Cities.

A brief narrative and cost breakdown to each appropriation.

NPDES Public Education as provided by Flood Control/County. 545
CSA 152
SCHEDULE OF EVENTS *

EXHIBIT B
January
2 15
20 30
February
10 15
Cities and County begin CSA 152/NPDES budget process for upcoming fiscal year.

County provides updated BAU summary to first year CSA 152 Cities.

County provides statement of accounts to each City for first tax collection period of fiscal year (December). Statement reflects year to date CSA 152 revenue collected from each City and its zone of benefit (incorporated city boundaries).

City prepares and submits to County a statement of expenses for City CSA 152/NPDES program.

County receives expense statement of Cities and effects reimbursement to Cities. Reimbursement is limited to the amount of City CSA 152 revenue collected less County expenses as outlined in CSA 152 agreement. County shall submit to City on a quarterly basis County expenses for inclusion in City expense statement.

Deadline for City to notify County of proposed increase in City CSA 152 assessment rate.

March
1 10
15 15
Cities and County finalize individual CSA 152 budgets and proposed BAU assessment rates.

Deadline for first year CSA Cities or Cities with CSA rate increase to submit information for CSA legal mailing of estimated assessments.

Required information includes times, dates, appropriate addresses ofpublic forum/offices including phone numbers and proposed BAU rate of City.

City CSA 152 budgets due to County for consolidation of overall CSA 152 budget.

County conducts BAU computer and print services of CSA legal mailings for first year CSA Cities and Cities with rate increases. 1 10
10 County submits total CSA 152 budget for review and inclusion into overall County Budget.

Legal mailing date for estimated assessments on parcels for any new or proposed increases in City CSA 152 rates. County provides list of assessor parcel numbers and estimated assessments to those CSA Cities with new/increased rates.

Second installment of taxes/assessments due.
546

May
1 10
15 20
County provides Cities with second statement of accounts for year to date City CSA 152 revenue collected.

Cities prepare and submit statement of expenses for reimbursement of CSA 152/NPDES program costs.

Cities with proposed increased CSA 152 assessments over the current year hold public forums to address City constituents and questions.

County reviews/approves expense statement of Cities and effects reimbursement to Cities.

June/July
July
15 County Board of Supervisors conducts public heatings on CSA assessments rates including CSA 152 rates or proposed rate increases. Changes may occur to CSA rates at discretion of Board.

Reconciliation of statement of accounts for County and each CSA 152 City zone of benefit). Balanced statement reflects total revenue collected for prior fiscal year. Cities may apply for balance to cover reimbursement of undeffunded City NrpDES expenses or balance is carried forward into next fiscal year within CSA 152 City account ( zone of benefit).

July/August County Board approves f'mal County budget including CSA budgets.

Budgets may change at the discretion of the Board.

September First County and City tax/assessments bills of the fiscal year are mailed.

October
15 Cities provided with update BAU summary and list of assessor parcel numbers and actual assessments.

October Cities respond to taxpayer requests for parcel re-assessments or re-evaluations and forward recommendations and corrections to County.

November
City provides BAU and assessor parcel corrections to County for updating in file.

December
10 First installment of taxes and assessments due/collected by County for current fiscal year.

Use schedule for CSA 152 planning purposes.
547

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Douglas Schulze, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Nate Smith, Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer Art Vela, Director of Public Works
MEETING DATE: January 14, 2025
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution 2025-03, Awarding a Professional Services Agreement to CASC Engineering Consulting, Inc. for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Inspections and Environmental Compliance Services in the Amount of $40,049
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2025-03.

BACKGROUND:

The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) is a federally mandated program to control non-point sources of runoff pollution. The NPDES program is part of the Clean Water Act enacted by Congress in 1987. The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin, Region No. 7, in implementing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s storm water NPDES permit program, requires that the Districts and Incorporated Cities within the Whitewater River Basin obtain a joint permit to discharge storm water into the various storm channels and washes throughout the Whitewater River Watershed area. The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) and Riverside County are acting as the Lead Agency with the City of Banning being a copermittee, along with the various other agencies and municipalities located within the Whitewater River Basin. This current Permit was adopted by the Regional Board on June 20, 2013, expired on June 19, 2018 and has been negotiated and worked on with the affected parties over the past six years. A new permit (2025 NPDES Permit) that has been negotiated with the Regional Board is in review. It is anticipated to be adopted by the end of FY 2024/2025 and will take effect 90 days later.

The City of Banning is required, through Best Management Practices (BMPs), to implement practices within our community which reduce pollutants entering into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The major components of the existing and 2025 NPDES Permit to implement the BMPs include: project management, attendance at Desert Task Force meetings, record keeping and Annual Report preparation; illegal dumping and illicit connection detection, inspection, spill prevention and cleanup activities; commercial and industrial facilities inspections (about 80 per year) and the review of all City issued business licenses for SB 205 compliance; implementing land development and plan review procedures including plan check, preparing Conditions of Approval, reviewing erosion control plans and WQMPs and ensuring post construction self-inspections are performed annually by required businesses; enforcing and implementing construction activities requirements of City and private development projects including construction site inspections, review of developer’s BMPs, erosion control plans and SWPPPs (Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans), and ensuring compliance with the Regional Board’s Construction General Permit requirements; maintaining City facilities, including the City Corporate and Water Yards and Fire Station, and storm drains and performing inspections and 548
maintenance, removing trash and debris from the storm drain system, and from roads through street sweeping; and implementing public education and outreach programs by providing brochures to the public at City events and at the public counter, to businesses and contractors through inspections and storm water training of municipal staff.

The main new requirements of the 2025 NPDES Permit are:
• Asset Management
• Fiscal Cost Analysis/Cost Reporting
• Urban Pesticides
• Trash Amendment/Trash Capture Device Installation
• New Construction General Permit
• Continued SB 205 Compliance, business license verification of SIC Codes The NPDES program is managed in-house by the Public Works Department, Engineering Division staff with the exception of WQMP plan checks and storm water compliance inspections for commercial and industrial businesses. The Public Works Inspector used to perform these inspections when there were thirty or so per year. About ten (10) years ago after the 2013 NPDES Permit was implemented, more businesses were required to be inspected and thus a consultant was needed to assist with this additional workload. The Public Works Inspector still performs all of the required NPDES construction inspections, which totaled 58 this past fiscal year.

The City is co-permittee on NPDES Permit No. R7-2013-0011 in the Whitewater River Region and the Permit requirements are explained in the Storm Water Management Plan. The County Department of Environmental Health (DEH) issues Hazardous Material Permits to facilities that are required to be inspected by the City either annually or every three years. Additionally, retail food service facilities with Food Establishment Permits must be inspected once per Permit term. Facilities with Regional Board issued Industrial General (IG) Permits require annual inspections and SB205 business license review (checking SIC codes) to ensure IG Permit compliance is also required. It is estimated 120 or so NPDES commercial and industrial inspections will be required this calendar year, due to many three- and fiveyear inspections being due.

Consultant Contract
A Request for Proposals (RFP) 24-084, “NPDES (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) Inspections and Environmental Compliance Services” was prepared to hire an environmental engineering consultant firm. On September 27, 2024, Purchasing Division staff released the RFP through the Open Gov electronic bidding program notifying qualified firms of the opportunity to provide proposals. The RFP was advertised in the Press Enterprise on October 2, 2024, shown as Attachment

2. The Scope of Work provides for performing the NPDES inspection per the City’s inspection form at the frequency described in the NPDES Permit and updating and maintaining the current Spreadsheet and providing this to the Project Manager monthly. There is an additional Task 2. Environmental Compliance Services, that will be used for unanticipated work on an as needed basis.

The deadline for submitting proposals was November 4, 2024 and three (3) firms responded with submittals. An evaluation committee consisting of three (3) City staff members, evaluated the three (3) proposals that were received based on qualifications of key personnel, experience in performing NPDES storm water related inspections under the Regional Board No. 7 issued NPDES Permit, approaches in providing the scope of work services, references, and price proposals.

Listed below are the three (3) firms that submitted proposals in order of the total combined score received from the three (3) evaluators:

Consultant Total Score
CASC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. 91.33
G&G Environmental Compliance, Inc. LLC 88.33
549
Alisto Engineering Group 67.33
CASC Engineering Consulting, Inc. received the highest score, and their Proposal and Fee Proposal are shown as Attachments 3 and 4, respectively. The company is a reputable, qualified firm that has successfully provided these services, and they continue to do so, for several cities within the same Regional Board No. 7 issued NPDES Permit as Banning, and as a result, staff recommends the contract award to CASC Engineering Consulting, Inc. in the amount of $40,049.

JUSTIFICATION:

The current NPDES Permit No. R7-2013-0011 and upcoming 2025 NPDES Permit require businesses within the City with County DEH and State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) issued Permits be inspected for stormwater compliance to ensure that potential pollutants do not drain into the storm drain system. A consultant firm is needed to perform these inspections for the City to ensure compliance with the NPDES Permit.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Public Works Department, Streets Division, assists with the implementation and Engineering Division staff manages the NPDES program in-house. Consultants are utilized for Water Quality Management Plan and Erosion Control Plan review (the developer pays these fees through deposits) and for NPDES storm water and industrial waste inspections (with a fee of $158 charged per inspection).

Storm water program responsibilities are completed by about ten (10) Public Works Department staff members on a part-time and as-needed basis, but there are no full-time staff assigned to the program.

In anticipation of the upcoming new 2025 NPDES Permit cost/fiscal reporting requirements, a new stormwater fund, Fund 105, was created to track expenses. A budget transfer and appropriation in the amount of $40,049 from the Streets Fund to Account No. 105-6100-455.33-11 (Professional Services) is needed to fund the Professional Services Agreement. The Agreement term is up to five years, based upon satisfactory performance each year. A “not to exceed” total five year contract amount of $240,000 is requested to assist with each year’s required NPDES inspections, which may increase under the new 2025 NPDES Permit, and Task 2 Environmental Compliance Services, projects such as updating the City and Water Yard’s Facility Pollution Prevention Plans, and any unanticipated work that could not be done in house, if needed.

The requested appropriation and transfer of funds does not impact the General Fund.

ALTERNATIVES:

If the City Council elects to not approve this Resolution, then to maintain compliance with the NPDES Permit, additional staff resources will have to be trained and diverted from other necessary City tasks.

The inspection fee is partially offset from an authorized inspection fee on the Public Works Fee Schedule.

BUDGETED?:

No
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT:

Yes
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 2025-03, CASC NPDES.docx

2. Exhibit A C01107 - CASC PSA.pdf

3. Att. 2 - Press Enterprise Proof of Ad, 10.2.24.pdf

4. Att. 3 - CASC Proposal.pdf

5. Att. 4 - CASC, Detailed Cost Estimate, Bid Sheet.pdf 550
Resolution 2025-03

RESOLUTION 2025-03

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA,

AWARDING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR NATIONAL POLLUTANT

DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM INSPECTIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVCIES TO CASC ENGINEERING CONSULTING, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $40,049 WHEREAS, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) is a federally mandated program to control non-point sources of runoff pollution and the NPDES program is part of the Clean Water Act enacted by Congress in 1987. The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin, Region No. 7, in implementing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s storm water NPDES permit program, requires that the Districts and Incorporated Cities within the Whitewater River Basin obtain a joint permit to discharge storm water into the various storm channels and washes throughout the Whitewater River Watershed area; and
WHEREAS, the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) and Riverside County are acting as the Lead Agency with the City of Banning being a co-permittee, along with the various other agencies and municipalities located within the Whitewater River Basin; and
WHEREAS, the City is co-permittee on NPDES Permit No. R7-2013-0011 in the Whitewater River Region and the Permit requirements are explained in the Storm Water Management Plan, including commercial and industrial stormwater compliance inspections; and WHEREAS, the County Department of Environmental Health (DEH) issues Hazardous Material Permits to facilities that are required to be inspected by the City either annually or every three years. Additionally, retail food service facilities with DEH issued Food Establishment Permits must be inspected once per Permit term. Facilities with Regional Board issued Industrial General (IG) Permits require annual inspections and SB205 business license review (checking SIC codes) to ensure IG Permit compliance is also required; and WHEREAS, on September 27, 2024 a Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 24-084 was released to hire an environmental engineering consultant firm. The Scope of Work provides for performing the NPDES commercial and industrial storm water compliance inspections using the City’s inspection form at the frequency described in the NPDES Permit, providing outreach of BMP materials to businesses, updating and maintaining the current Spreadsheet of businesses, and providing this to the Project Manager monthly; and
WHEREAS, an evaluation committee consisting of three (3) City staff members, evaluated the three (3) proposals that were received based on qualifications of key personnel, experience in performing NPDES storm water related inspections under the Regional Board No. 7 issued NPDES Permit, approaches in providing the scope of work services, references, and price proposals; and
WHEREAS, CASC Engineering Consulting, Inc. had the highest combined score from the three evaluators and is a reputable qualified firm that is currently providing these services to several cities within the same Whitewater River Region NPDES Permit as Banning, and they have extensive NPDES Permit experience and as a result, staff recommends the contract be awarded to CASC Engineering Consulting, Inc.; and
551
Resolution 2025-03

WHEREAS, the expenditure will be funded with a budget appropriation and transfer from the Streets Fund to a new Stormwater Account, 105-6100-455.3311 (Professional Services) in the amount of $40,049.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council approves the Professional Services Agreement with CASC Engineering Consulting, Inc. for a one-year term in an amount of $40,049 and subsequent amendments to extend the Agreement for up to four additional year terms upon satisfactory performance, with a total not-to-exceed amount of $240,000 over five (5) years.

SECTION 2. The City Council authorizes the City Manager to make non-substantive changes to the Professional Services Agreement and to execute the Professional Services Agreement with CASC Engineering Consulting, Inc. on behalf of the City Council.

SECTION 3. The City Council authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to make necessary budget adjustments, appropriations, and transfers related to this resolution.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of January, 2025.

Sheri Flynn, Mayor
City of Banning
ATTEST:

Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk
City of Banning
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

John Pinkney, City Attorney
552
Resolution 2025-03

CERTIFICATION:

I, Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2025-03, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 14th day of January 2025 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________________
Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk
City of Banning, California
553
Resolution 2025-03

Exhibit A
Professional Services Agreement with CASC Engineering Consulting, Inc. 554
-1-
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (C01107) FOR NPDES

INSPECTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES BY

AND BETWEEN CITY OF BANNING AND CASC ENGINEERING AND
CONSULTING, INC.

THIS AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (herein “Agreement”) is made and entered into this day: ___________________, (“Effective Date”) by and between the CITY OF BANNING, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and CASC Engineering and Consulting, Inc., a California Corporation, (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. City has sought a Request for a Proposal (RFP #24-084) for the performance of the services for NPDES Inspection and Environmental Compliance Services and as further defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement.

B. Consultant, following submission of a proposal for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, was selected by City to perform those services.

C. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.

D. Pursuant to the City of Banning’s Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

1.1 Scope of Services.

In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide those services specified in the “Scope of Services” attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference, which services may be referred to herein as the “Services” hereunder. As a material inducement to City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the Services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the Services contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all Services described herein. Consultant covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the Services required hereunder and that all materials will be of good quality, and fit 555
-2-
for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “highest professional standards” shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more first-class firms performing similar work under similar circumstances.

1.2 Contract Documents and Exhibits.

This Agreement includes the Request for Proposal and Consultant’s accepted proposal (“Contract Documents”), both of which are on file with the City and incorporated herein by this general reference as though fully set forth herein. Exhibit A (Scope of Services), Exhibit B (Special Requirements), Exhibit C (Schedule of Compensation), and Exhibit D (Schedule of Performance) also constitute a part of this Agreement and are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. Except as set forth in Section 1.10 regarding Exhibit B, this Agreement controls over the Contract Documents and the provisions in Exhibits A, B and C.

1.3 Compliance with Law.

Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of City and any Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered, and shall render all Services hereunder in accordance therewith.

1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments.

Consultant shall obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement, at its sole cost and expense, all necessary licenses, permits, certificates and approvals required by law for the performance of Services under this Agreement, including a City business license. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for all fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and which arise from or are necessary for Consultant’s performance of the Services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents, against all such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder.

1.5 Familiarity with Services.

By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant: (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the Scope of Services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how the Services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities and any difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the Services under this Agreement. If the Services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions existing therein, prior to commencement of Services hereunder. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the Services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer (defined in Section 1.12. A). 556
-3-

1.6 Prevention of Loss and Damages.

Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the Term (defined in Section 3.4) to furnish continuous protection to the work product, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the Services by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City’s own negligence.

1.7 Further Responsibilities of Parties.

Both Parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both Parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonable necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither Party shall be responsible to perform the Services of the other.

1.8 Additional Services.

City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the Services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra services beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or to make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from the Services. No such extra services may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer to Consultant, which written order incorporates therein an adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum (as defined in Section

2.1), and/or (ii) the Schedule of Performance, (as defined in Section 3.2), and which written order is approved in writing by Consultant. Any increase in compensation of up to ten percent (10%) of the Contract Sum, or $25,000, whichever is less; or in the Schedule of Performance of up to one hundred eighty (180) days may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively, must be approved by City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to Services which are specifically set forth in the Scope of Services or which are reasonably contemplated therein. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the Services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor.

1.9 Facilities and Equipment.

Except as otherwise provided, Consultant shall, at its own cost and expense, provide all facilities and equipment necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement. City shall make available to Consultant only physical facilities such as desks, filing cabinets, and conference space (“City Facilities”), as City deems, in its sole discretion, to be reasonably necessary for Consultant’s use while consulting with City employees and reviewing records and the information in possession of City. The location, quality, and time of furnishing City Facilities shall be in the sole discretion of City. In no event shall City be required to furnish any facilities that may involve incurring any direct expense, including but not limited to a computer, long distance telephone, network data, internet or other communication charges, vehicles and reproduction facilities. 557
-4-

1.10 Special Requirements.

Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the “Special Requirements” attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit B and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit B shall govern.

1.11 Corrections.

In addition to the indemnification obligations set forth in Article 4, and Sections 1.4, 1.13,

5.3, 5.4, and 6.3, Consultant shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the Services which may be disclosed during City’s review of Consultant’s report or plans. Should Consultant fail to make such correction(s) in a reasonably timely manner, such correction(s) may be made by City, and the cost thereof shall be charged to Consultant. In addition to all other available remedies, City may deduct the cost of such correction(s) from any retention amount held by City, or may withhold payment otherwise owed Consultant under this Agreement up to the amount of the cost of correction(s), as provided in Section 6.3.

1.12 Party Representatives.

A. Contract Officer: For the purposes of this Agreement, the Contract Officer shall be the City Manager, or such other person designated in writing by the City Manager (“Contract Officer”). Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager, to sign all documents on behalf of City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement.

B. Principals and Personnel of Consultant.
1) Consultant Representative: The following principal of Consultant is hereby designated as being the Consultant Representative authorized to act on Consultant’s behalf regarding the Services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith:

Name Title
Rick Sidor President
It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing Consultant Representative were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing Consultant Representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the Services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the Consultant Representative. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing Consultant Representative may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced or reassigned by Consultant without the express written approval of City. It shall be Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the Services, and Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. 558
-5-
2) Consultant’s Personnel: Consultant has, or will secure at its own expense, all personnel required to perform the Services required under this Agreement. All of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision, and all personnel engaged in the Services shall be qualified to perform such Services. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant’s staff and sub-contractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services required under this Agreement.

Consultant shall notify City of all changes in Consultant’s staff and sub-contractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance. In the event that City, in its sole discretion, at any time during the term of this Agreement, desires to reassign any staff or sub-contractor of Consultant, City shall give notice as set forth in Section 8.1. Consultant shall, immediately upon the receipt of the notice to re-assign staff from City, reassign such person or persons.

1.13 Independent Contractor.

A. Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee of City.

Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City. All Services provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods, and details of performing the Services. Any additional personnel performing Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance.

B. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Consultant’s personnel practices. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant’s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section.

1.14 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment.

The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, the Consultant Representative and employees were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement.

Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the Services required hereunder without the express written approval of City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this 559
-6-
Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shall release Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City.

1.15 Debarment or Suspension.

Consultant represents and warrants that, as of the Effective Date of this Agreement, Consultant is not debarred or suspended pursuant to any applicable Federal or State law providing for the debarment of contractors. Consultant shall not perform the Services with any subcontractor that has been debarred or suspended pursuant to any applicable Federal or State law providing for the debarment. Consultant and its subcontractors shall not be debarred or suspended throughout the Term of this Agreement pursuant to any applicable Federal or State law providing for the debarment of contractors. If Consultant or any subcontractor becomes debarred or suspended during the Term of this Agreement, Consultant shall immediately notify City.

ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.

2.1 Contract Sum.

Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, as full compensation for Services satisfactorily rendered, City shall pay Consultant at the hourly rates set forth in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference. In no event shall Consultant be paid more than Forty Thousand Two Hundred Ninety-Nine Dollars ($40,299.00) (the “Contract Sum”). The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by City. Coordination of the performance of the Services with City is a critical component of the Services. If Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending those meetings.

2.2 Method of Compensation.

The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion of the Services, (ii) payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the Services, (iii) payment for time and materials based upon Consultant’s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, provided that time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, but not exceeding the Contract Sum or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation.

2.3 Reimbursable Expenses.

City shall only reimburse Consultant for those actual and necessary expenses expressly set forth in Exhibit C. Reimbursable expenses may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in advance, or actual sub-contractor expenses of an approved sub-contractor pursuant to Section 1.14, and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation.

2.4 Unauthorized Services and Expenses.
560
-7-
City will not pay for any Services or reimburse for any expenses incurred which are not specified in the Scope of Services, unless authorized in writing as set forth in Section 1.8 of this Agreement. City shall make payment for such authorized additional Services and expenses in accordance with Article 2 of this Agreement.

2.5 Invoices.

Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all Services performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month. Each such invoice shall contain all of the information set forth in Section III of Exhibit C to this Agreement. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the Agreement. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate Services performed by more than one person.

City shall independently review each invoice submitted by Consultant to determine whether the Services performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within thirty (30) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and undisputed invoice, except as to any charges for Services performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 6.3. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City of any invoice provided by Consultant shall not constitute waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law.

2.6 Waiver.

Payment to Consultant for Services performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in Services performed by Consultant.

ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE

3.1 Time of Essence.

Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not be construed to limit or deprive a Party of the benefits of any grace or use period allowed in this Agreement.

3.2 Schedule of Performance.

Consultant shall commence the Services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all Services within the time period(s) established in the “Schedule of Performance” attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by this reference.

3.3 Force Majeure.

The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement may be extended because of any delays due to 561
-8-
unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Consultant. Such unforeseeable consequences include, but are not restricted to, acts of God or public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including City, if Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the Services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified, subject to the provisions of Section 1.8. The Contract Officer’s determination (or the City Council’s determination, in the event the period of enforced delay exceeds the period specified in Section

1.8) shall be final and conclusive upon the Parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused; Consultant’s sole remedy shall be the extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section.

3.4 Term.

The Term of this Agreement shall be from the Effective Date through January 31, 2026 with an option to renew for four (4) one-year terms, unless sooner terminated as provided in Article 6 of this Agreement or extended as provided in Sections 1.8 and 3.3 of this Agreement. Maximum term and any subsequent amendment or modification shall not exceed five (5) years.

ARTICLE 4. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

4.1 Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance.

Consultant shall procure and at all times during the term of this Agreement carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect, insurance as follows:

A. Commercial General Liability Insurance with a minimum limit of $1,000,000.00 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage and a general aggregate limit of $2,000,000.00 per project or location. If Consultant is a limited liability company, the commercial general liability coverage shall be amended so that Consultant and its managers, members, affiliates, employees, agents and other persons necessary or incidental to its operation are insureds.

B. Automobile Liability Insurance for any owned, non-owned or hired vehicle used in connection with the performance of this Agreement with a combined single limit of $1,000,000.00 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. If Consultant does not use any owned, non-owned or hired vehicles in the performance of Services under this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain a non-owned auto endorsement to the Commercial General Liability policy.

C. Workers’ Compensation Insurance as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance with a minimum limit of $1,000,000.00 per accident for bodily injury or disease. If Consultant has no employees while performing Services under this Agreement, workers’ compensation policy is not required; however, Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees.
562
-9-
D. Professional Liability/Errors and Omissions Insurance with minimum limits of $1,000,000.00 per claim and in the aggregate.

4.2 Acceptability of Insurers.

The insurance policies required under this Article shall be issued by an insurer admitted to write insurance in the State of California with a rating of A:VII or better in the latest edition of the A.M. Best Insurance Rating Guide. Self-insurance shall not be considered to comply with the insurance requirements under this Article.

4.3 Additional Insured.

The commercial general and automobile liability policies shall contain an endorsement naming City, its officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds.

4.4 Primary and Non-Contributing.

The insurance policies required under this Article shall apply on a primary noncontributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance available to City. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its officers, employees, agents or volunteers, shall be in excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

4.5 Consultant’s Waiver of Subrogation.

The insurance policies required under this Article shall not prohibit Consultant and Consultant’s employees, agents or sub-contractors from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives all rights of subrogation against City.

4.6 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions.

Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At City’s option, Consultant shall either reduce or eliminate the deductibles or self-insured retentions with respect to City; or Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and expenses.

4.7 Cancellations or Modifications to Coverage.

Consultant shall not cancel, reduce or otherwise modify the insurance policies required by this Article during the term of this Agreement. The commercial general and automobile liability policies required under this Agreement shall be endorsed to state that should the issuing insurer cancel the policy before the expiration date, the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail 30 days’ prior written notice to City. If any insurance policy required under this Article is canceled or reduced in coverage or limits, Consultant shall, within two (2) Business Days (as defined in Section 8.12) of notice from the insurer, phone, fax or notify City via certified mail, return receipt requested, of the cancellation of or changes to the policy.

4.8 City Remedy for Noncompliance.
563
-10-
If Consultant does not maintain the policies of insurance required under this Article in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement, or in the event any of Consultant’s policies do not comply with the requirements under this Article, City may either immediately terminate this Agreement or, if insurance is available at a reasonable cost, City may, but has no duty to, take out the necessary insurance and pay, at Consultant’s expense, the premium thereon.

Consultant shall promptly reimburse City for any premium paid by City, or City may withhold amounts sufficient to pay the premiums from payments due to Consultant.

4.9 Evidence of Insurance.

Prior to the performance of Services under this Agreement, Consultant shall furnish the City Clerk with a certificate or certificates of insurance and all original endorsements evidencing and effecting the coverages required under this Article. The endorsements are subject to City’s approval. Consultant may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies to City. Consultant shall maintain current endorsements on file with the City Clerk.

Consultant shall provide proof to the City Clerk that insurance policies expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Consultant shall furnish such proof at least two (2) weeks prior to the expiration of the coverages.

4.10 Indemnity Requirements not Limiting.

Procurement of insurance by Consultant shall not be construed as a limitation of Consultant’s liability or as full performance of Consultant’s duty to indemnify City under this Agreement.

4.11 Sub-contractor Insurance Requirements.

Consultant shall require each of its sub-contractors that perform Services under this Agreement to maintain insurance coverage that meets all of the requirements of this Article.

4.12 Indemnification, Hold Harmless, and Duty to Defend.

A. Indemnification of City.
1) To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, defend, hold harmless and indemnify City and its elected officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, designated volunteers, successors, assigns and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”), from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, expenses, judgments, penalties, liens, and losses of any nature whatsoever, including fees of accountants, attorneys, or other professionals and all costs associated therewith and the payment of all consequential damages (collectively “Liabilities”), at law or in equity, whether actual, alleged or threatened, which arise out of, are claimed to arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts or omissions of Consultant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, sub-contractors, materialmen, consultants or their officers, agents, servants or employees (or any entity or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of this Agreement, including the Indemnitees’ active or passive negligence, except for Liabilities arising 564
-11-
from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees as determined by court decision or by the agreement of the Parties. Consultant shall defend the Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any Liabilities with counsel of the Indemnitees’ choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all attorneys’ fees and experts’ costs actually incurred in connection with such defense. Consultant shall reimburse the Indemnitees for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by Indemnitees in connection therewith.
2) Consultant shall pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Consultant under this Agreement, and indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Consultant shall fully comply with the workers’ compensation law regarding Consultant and Consultant’s employees. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Consultant to comply with applicable workers’ compensation laws. City may offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant’s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this subparagraph A.2. 3) Consultant shall obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those in this Article from each and every sub-contractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Consultant in the performance of this Agreement.

If Consultant fails to obtain such indemnity obligations, Consultant shall be fully responsible and indemnify, hold harmless and defend the Indemnitees from and against any and all Liabilities at law or in equity, whether actual, alleged or threatened, which arise out of, are claimed to arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts or omissions of Consultant’s sub-contractor, its officers, agents, servants, employees, sub-contractors, materialmen, consultants or their officers, agents, servants or employees (or any entity or individual that Consultant’s sub-contractor shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of this Agreement, including the Indemnitees’ active or passive negligence, except for Liabilities arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees as determined by court decision or by the agreement of the Parties.

B. Workers’ Compensation Acts not Limiting. Consultant’s indemnifications and obligations under this Article, or any other provision of this Agreement, shall not be limited by the provisions of any workers’ compensation act or similar act. Consultant expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statutes or laws as to City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers.

C. Insurance Requirements not Limiting. City does not, and shall not, waive any rights that it may possess against Consultant because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. The indemnities in this Article shall apply regardless of whether or not any insurance policies are determined to be applicable to the Liabilities, tax, assessment, penalty or interest asserted against City.

D. Survival of Terms. Consultant’s indemnifications and obligations under this Article shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 565
-12-
ARTICLE 5. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION

5.1 Service Records.

Consultant shall keep, and require sub-contractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and Services performed hereunder (the “Service Records”), as shall be necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such Services. Any and all such Service Records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such Service Records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make copies and transcripts from such Service Records. Such Service Records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the Services hereunder, and City shall have access to such Service Records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant’s business, custody of the Service Records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Consultant’s successor in interest (“Consultant’s Successor”). If custody of the Service Records is given to Consultant’s Successor, Consultant shall give written notice to City of the transfer of the Service Records to Consultant’s Successor. The notice shall include contact information (address and telephone number) for Consultant’s Successor, and access shall be provided to City by Consultant’s Successor.

5.2 Reports.

Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the Services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that City is greatly concerned about the cost of Services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the Services contemplated herein, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of that fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto.

5.3 Ownership of Documents.

All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the “Consultant Documents”) prepared by Consultant, its employees, sub-contractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the Consultant Documents hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed Consultant Documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted Consultant Documents without specific written authorization by Consultant will be at City’s sole risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use or assignment. Consultant may retain copies of such Consultant Documents for its own use. Consultant shall have an unrestricted right to use the concepts embodied therein. All 566
-13-
sub-contractors shall provide for assignment to City of all Consultant Documents prepared by them; and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom.

5.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information.

A. All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer.

B. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or sub-contractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the Services performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.

C. If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or sub-contractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorneys’ fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct.

D. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or sub-contractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any Party regarding this Agreement and the Services performed thereunder. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite the response.

ARTICLE 6. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION

6.1 California Law.

This Agreement, and any dispute arising from the relationship between the Parties to this Agreement, shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the Parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in Riverside. 567
-14-

6.2 Disputes; Default.

A. In the event that City determines Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any Services performed after the date of default. In addition to the provisions of Section 4.8, and the right to terminate pursuant to Section 6.7, if the City Manager determines that Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, City may serve Consultant with written notice of the default. Consultant shall have ten (10) calendar days after service upon it of the notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance.

In the event that Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, City may, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.

B. In the event of termination pursuant to this Section, City may take over the Services and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the Services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed City as provided in Section 6.3.

6.3 Retention of Funds.

Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement): (i) any payment amount of which may be in dispute hereunder or which is necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, (ii) all amounts retained pursuant to the provisions of Section 4.8, (iii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant’s obligation under this Agreement, and (iv) all payments due or that become due to Consultant during the period that Consultant or any of its sub-contractors fail to maintain any required insurance in full force and effect, until notice is received by City that the required insurance has been restored to full force and effect and that the premiums therefore have been paid for a period satisfactory to City, as provided in Section 4.9, above. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.

6.4 Waiver.

Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement.

Acceptance by City of any Services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the 568
-15-
provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting Party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.

Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing, and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.

6.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative.

Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other Party.

6.6 Legal Action.

In addition to any other rights or remedies, either Party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Consultant must file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections 905 et seq. and 910 et seq., in order to pursue a legal action against City under this Agreement.

6.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term.

This Article 6 shall govern any termination of this Agreement except as specifically provided in Section 6.2 for termination for default of Consultant. City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Consultant, except that where termination is due to the fault of Consultant, the period of notice may be a shorter time as may be determined by the Contract Officer. In addition, Consultant reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon sixty (60) days’ written notice to City, except that where termination is due to the fault of City, the period of notice may be a shorter time as Consultant may determine. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all Services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Except where Consultant has initiated termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all Services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any Services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 6.3. In the event Consultant has initiated termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced hereunder. In the event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the terminating Party need not provide the non-terminating Party with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 6.2.

6.8 Attorneys’ Fees.

In any litigation or other proceeding by which a Party seeks to enforce its rights under this Agreement (whether in contract, tort or both) or seeks a declaration of any rights or obligations under this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other 569
-16-
relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees. Attorneys’ fees shall include attorney’s fees on any appeal, and in addition the Party entitled to attorneys’ fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment.

ARTICLE 7. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION

7.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees.

No officer or employee of City shall be personally liable to Consultant, or Consultant’s Successor, in the event of any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Consultant or Consultant’s Successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.

7.2 Conflict of Interest.

Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or sub-contractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement.

No officer or employee of City shall have any direct or indirect financial interest in this Agreement within the scope of Government Code section 1090, nor shall any such officer or employee make, participate in making, or use his or her official position to influence, any City decision relating to the Agreement which has a material financial effect on his or her financial interests or the financial interests of any corporation, partnership or association in which he or she is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.

Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and sub-contractors, if any, shall comply with all conflict of interest statutes of the State of California applicable to Consultant’s Services under this Agreement, including the Political Reform Act (Gov. Code § 81000, et seq.) and Government Code Section 1090. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant may perform similar services for other clients; but Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and subcontractors shall not, without the Contract Officer’s prior written approval, perform services for another person or entity for whom Consultant is not currently performing services that would require Consultant or one of its officers, employees, associates or sub-contractors to abstain from a decision under this Agreement pursuant to a conflict of interest statute. Consultant shall incorporate a clause substantially similar to this Section into any subcontract that Consultant executes in connection with the performance of this Agreement. 570
-17-

7.3 Covenant Against Discrimination.

Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement.

Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, or ancestry, or other protected class.

7.4 Unauthorized Aliens.

Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of Services covered by this Agreement, and should the any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by City.

ARTICLE 8. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

8.1 Notices.

Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, bill, invoice, report or other communication required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and conclusively deemed effective: (a) on confirmed delivery by courier service or overnight delivery service during Consultant’s and City’s regular business hours; or (b) three (3) Business Days after deposit in the United States mail, by certified or registered mail, and addressed to the Party to be notified as set forth below:

If to City Attn: Nathan Smith
Deputy Director of Public Works
City of Banning
99 East Ramsey Street
Banning, California 92220
Email: [email protected]
If to Consultant: Attn: Rick Sidor
President/Owner
CASC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.
77564 County Club Drive, Suite 211
Palm Desert, CA 92211
Email: [email protected]

571
-18-

8.2 Interpretation.

The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either Party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

8.3 Counterparts.

This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument.

8.4 Integration; Amendment.

This Agreement, and all exhibits referred to in this Agreement, constitute the final, complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement between the Parties pertaining to the subject matter of this Agreement and supersede all other and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the Parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No Party has been induced to enter into this Agreement by, nor is any Party relying on, any representation or warranty except those expressly set forth in this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by Consultant and by City Council. The Parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void.

8.5 Severability.

In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the Parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either Party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.

8.6 Mutual Cooperation.

A. City’s Cooperation. City shall provide Consultant with all pertinent data, documents and other requested information as is reasonably available for Consultant’s proper performance of the Services required under this Agreement.

B. Consultant’s Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to Consultant’s performance of Services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance that City requires. 572
-19-

8.7 No Third Party Beneficiaries Intended.

This Agreement is made solely for the benefit of the Parties to this Agreement and their respective successors and assigns, and no other person or entity may have or acquire a right by virtue of this Agreement.

8.8 Final Payment Acceptance Constitutes Release.

The acceptance by Consultant of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of City from all claims and liabilities for compensation to Consultant for anything done, furnished or relating to Consultant’s Services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of City’s check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten (10) calendar days of the receipt of that check. However, approval or payment by City shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of Consultant, its employees, sub-contractors and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or Services performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by City for any defect or error in the Services prepared by Consultant, its employees, sub-contractors and agents.

8.9 Non-Appropriation of Funds.

Payments to be made to Consultant by City for Services performed within the current fiscal year which are within the current fiscal budget and within an available, unexhausted fund. In the event that City does not appropriate sufficient funds for payment of Consultant’s Services beyond the current fiscal year, this Agreement shall cover payment for Consultant’s Services only to the conclusion of the last fiscal year in which City appropriates sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at the conclusion of such fiscal year.

8.10 Headings.

The headings in this Agreement are included solely for convenience of reference and shall not affect the interpretation of any provision of this Agreement or any of the rights or obligations of the Parties to this Agreement.

8.11 Word Usage.

Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, (a) the words “shall,” “will” and “agrees” are mandatory and “may” is permissive; (b) “or” is not exclusive; and (c) “includes” or “including” are not limiting.

8.12 Business Days.
“Business Days” refers to days that the Banning City Hall is open for business.

8.13 Corporate Authority.

The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties hereto warrant that (i): such Party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver 573
-20-
this Agreement on behalf of that Party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such Party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which that Party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties.

8.14 Electronic Signatures.

Each Party may adopt as its signature an electronic identification consisting of a symbol or code that is affixed to or contained in each document transmitted by such Party (“electronic signature”). The Parties hereto herby agree that electronic signatures are acceptable, shall have the same force and effect under the law as original wet signatures, and shall be sufficient to verify that the Parties have executed this Agreement and such other documents transmitted by the Parties.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
574
-21-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first hereinabove written.

CITY OF BANNING CONSULTANT

Douglas Schulze, Date
City Manager
NAME: Date
TITLE:

NAME: Date
TITLE:

ATTEST:

Tax ID No.

Caroline Patton Date
Administrative City Clerk

Address:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Council Approval: _____________
Date
City Attorney

NOTE: PROOF OF AUTHORITY TO BIND CONTRACTING PARTY REQUIRED. APPROPRIATE

ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY.
575
Exhibit “A”-1
EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. Consultant will perform the following Services in connection with providing NPDES Inspection and Environmental Compliance Serivces prepared in connection therewith:

II. As part of the Services, Consultant will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products and services to City:
576

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES
A. STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH

GENERAL APPROACH
Casc is known for our ability to quickly respond and adapt to a variety of NPDES-related services requested by our clients. This is attributed to our technically seasoned and dedicated staff who place the City’s needs as priority. Casc has reviewed and acknowledges the Scope of Work listed in the RFP and provides the following generalized summary approach.

Project Management: With over 20 years of professional experience, Joyce Goode will serve as the Consultant NPDES Project Manager for the City. She has proven herself to be an expert in NPDES permits and a dedicated Project Manager for the City and will be the main point of contact for City staff. To provide certainty for immediate response to City requests, Casc will continue to implement a parallel style of program management to serve the City.
• Parallel Program Management: Casc proposes Parallel Program Management. This provides continual internal contact between the Project Manager and Technical Director, Melanie Sotelo. Working as a team, they are always available to meet the needs of the City via text, phone call, video conference or email, allowing for immediate response for service requests or questions/concerns.

This type of Program Management will allow Casc to serve the City as a “one-stop shop” for NPDES compliance. Our full-service water quality team is available to support the Project Manager and Technical Director to meet the needs of the City.

I. INSPECTION PROGRAM

GENERAL PROCESS
Casc’s inspectors currently provide inspection services for thousands of commercial, industrial, and restaurant facilities as well as inspection services for IC/ID investigations, construction inspections, and municipal facility inspections. Casc has a positive record of working with the business community to verify that facilities comply with permit requirements. Casc’s inspectors are experts in compliance requirements of the MS4 Permit, the Construction General Permit and the Industrial General Permit.

Services proposed include inspection services for Industrial/ SB205, Commercial, and Casc’s proposed stormwater inspection general process is detailed below.

Inspection Program Administration: The approach taken in conducting NPDES-related inspections (commercial, industrial/SB205, and restaurant) is generally the same, with subtle differences. Therefore, Casc will continue the following general inspection approach that has been fine tuned for conducting stormwaterrelated inspections. • Establish Inspection Schedule: Casc will obtain current inspection inventories from the City. The current inventory identified in the RFP cites 80 facilities would need inspections per fiscal year. Casc assumes 13 of these facilities are industrial based on a review of SMARTS. Casc assumes the remaining facilities are commercial or restaurants. If the City does not have an existing inventory, Casc will use the City’s business listing and Riverside County datafiles to identify facilities that require an inspection per the SWMP.

Development of the inspection inventory will not be included in the inspection costs for this task. Costs associated with the development of the inspection inventory will be included in the Environmental Compliance Special Services task. Casc will review the available inspection history of the current inventory Casc will serve the City as a “onestop shop” for NPDES compliance.
1 EXHIBIT "A" Exhibit "A" - 2
577

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES
and schedule inspections per SWMP requirements (e.g., twice a permit term or once per permit term.

Development and maintenance of the inspection schedule includes the following for consideration:
 Identify Inspection Development Type: Casc will review the type of inspection, the inspection schedule/frequency, and the scope of required NPDES-related inspections. Identify geographically similar sites to increase the number of inspections performed daily, thereby reducing overall inspection completion timelines.
 Consider peak business hours: Inspections will be scheduled to avoid peak business hours.  Language barriers: For business operators and construction sites where language barriers have the potential to cause a gap in communication regarding compliance, Casc has several bilingual inspectors to complete the inspections. Casc will also provide, as available, translated educational materials and pamphlets. Casc can also assist in the development of translated materials for the City per the City’s adopted policy requiring dual-language translation of documents and information distributed regarding educational brochures and outreach materials.
 Team Assignments: The Project Manager will assign and schedule inspections to appropriately credentialed staff (e.g., P.E., EIT, QSD, QSP, QISP, CPSWQ) depending on the scope of inspection service required. The assigned inspectors will dress professionally and conduct themselves in a manner appropriate for conducting activities as representatives of the City. • Inspection Preparation: Assigned inspectors will utilize available documentation apps to review the existing information depending on inspection type such as the project’s plan information, previous inspection reports, SMARTS database, compliance history, and project notes. • Perform Inspections: The inspector will arrive and walk the facility to observe facility layout, BMP installation, interceptors, and/or facility activities, existing and potential compliance issues, and discharges, if any. The inspector will provide verbal and educational pamphlets during the inspections. If the inspector observes any noncompliance issues, the inspector will discuss the issues with the site representative and provide recommendations for compliance.
• Documentation: The inspector will complete the inspection form using ArcGIS Survey123 that has been developed using the standardized forms in the SWMP. Use of Survey123 increases efficiency and workflow by providing the Project Management team with immediate access to the inspections. The inspections will note observations, compliance issues, and provide recommendations to the facility on how to achieve compliance with Permit requirements. Inspection reports will be generated with photographs of the inspections and provided to the facility owners/operators for their records via email or mail. • Reinspection/Follow-up: Inspectors will provide required reinspection and follow-up to verify items of noncompliance have been addressed. In Casc’s experience, approximately 15% of sites will require reinspection or follow-up services. All follow-up inspection activities will follow documentation and database requirements.
• Notices of Noncompliance and Citations: Facilities found to be in noncompliance will be discussed with City staff and enforcement actions beyond the issuance of a Notice of Noncompliance will be at the discretion of the City. The inspector will obtain photos of instances of noncompliance. Casc will notify the City of the Notice of Non Compliance, if applicable. If immediate threats to the health and safety of the 2 EXHIBIT "A" Exhibit "A" - 3
578

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES
public and/or the environment are observed, including illicit connections, or illegal discharges, the City will be contacted immediately.
• Notifications and Reporting: Since inspections are done in real time using Survey123, inspectors are able to notify the Program Manager via text or phone call as needed and the Project Manger is able to review findings and report areas of concerns to the City without delay. Casc will continue this approach to guarantee that notifications and reporting are enforced. • Deliverables: All inspection reports will be delivered in a pdf format and shared to the City via a OneDrive or other City preferred share folder. All inspection reports will be uploaded the share folder weekly. All inspection data will be uploaded to the share folder at the end of the contract term in csv file format.

ADDITIONAL PROCESS FOR COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL INSPECTIONS Casc will conduct the inspections to assist the City with fulfilling requirements of the Permit and SWMP. Casc will provide stormwater inspections of other facilities that pose a threat to stormwater in addition to commercial/industrial facilities as required.

Commercial/industrial inspections will also include the following steps:
• The inspector will field verify if the businesses are still operating. If businesses are no longer in operation, the inspector will update the inventory database to reflect an inspectable business is no longer at the location, or will update the database with a new facility. • Industrial facilities subject to coverage under the Industrial General Permit (IGP) will be identified and the inspector will verify the facility operator has a current Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) or a current No Exposure Certification (NEC). If the industrial facility has not obtained IGP coverage, the inspector will notify the owner or owner’s representative and provide information on obtaining coverage.

ADDITIONAL PROCESS FOR RESTAURANT INSPECTIONS
Most restaurant facilities have interceptors to separate fats, oils, and grease prior to entering the City’s sewer system. If these interceptors are not maintained properly, sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) can occur which can potentially impact the City’s MS4. If a restaurant is unable to provide maintenance records of the interceptor at the time of the inspection or during the follow-up inspection, Casc will notify the City of the potential concern.

II. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SPECIAL SERVICES
Casc will provide General NPDES Program Services as on an as needed basis as requested by the City. Task orders shall be prepared If a task item is needed, a Scope of Work would be written, and the consultant asked to provide a Cost Proposal at that time. The total hours for these services will not exceed 50 hrs/year.

Requested services will be covered by utilizing the team members that are strong in each area indicated in the Scope of Services. A generalized discussion of task items is summarized below:

Coordination and Administrative Items: Casc shall develop a task order upon the execution of the contract to address the following items:
• Kickoff Meeting: Casc will work directly with the City to coordinate a virtual kickoff meeting to establish contacts, review the parameters of the Scope, and discuss the development of as needed task orders. • Inspection Inventory Development: Casc has assisted multiple cities in the develop inspection inventories to comply with the requirements of the MS4 Permit and SWMP. Casc will coordinate with the City to obtain a current business license listing. If needed, Casc will also analyze County DEH datafiles provided by the City. Our team will analyze each facility to identify businesses that require inspection, as well as potential 3 EXHIBIT "A" Exhibit "A" - 4
579

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES
IGP coverage. Casc will also provide support to the Business License Department to recommend facilities that need to be reported to the Board as potential IGP non-filers. Casc will also review the City’s active business license listing and identify businesses that need to be inspected per the requirements of the SWMP.
• Administrative tasks: Administrative tasks shall include, but is not limited to, monthly billing, project oversight, and as needed assistance to the City for NPDES related inquiries.

Additional Compliance Special Services: Casc can provide additional optional support services on an as needed basis. Optional support services may include, but not limited to:
• Reports and Technical Studies, etc.: Casc will be able to assist the City with work on required reports, such as updates to the City’s FPPPs, SOPs, SWPPPs, WQMPS, and updates to Trash Amendment items • Annual Reporting: Casc has extensive experience in MS4 Permit Annual Report preparation and understands that providing the City time for review and comment on the internal draft of the report is essential. Casc will continue to provide suggested input and/or edits of proposed material to be submitted to the Regional Board. Further, Casc will work with City staff to obtain information required for reporting.

Casc will then prepare the Annual Report with two (2) internal draft review periods consisting of two (2) weeks, to allow sufficient review time.
• NPDES Permit Renewals: Casc represents current clients in the WWR region with MS4 Permit negotiations. Because of Casc’s status with CASQA, Casc also works with permit writers to influence language planned in the upcoming draft Permits.
• Inspection Fee Program: Casc has assisted several cities in the development of a fee study for implementation of the fee program for NPDES inspections. Casc can assist the City with verifications, both by desktop and during inspections, to properly prioritize businesses and update and maintain the City’s master list. Casc has established efficient coordination with the City’s Business License Department. • Regulatory Audits: Casc has extensive experience assisting other agencies with regulatory audits. Casc will draw on this experience to assist the City as needed with Permit-compliance audits. Casc has years of positive experience working with the Colorado River Regional Board staff, understanding that Regional Board audits typically focus on particular elements of the MS4 Permit stormwater programs, and will provide the following support:
 Work with City staff to obtain information and data required for the audit;  Preparation or completion of any pre-inspection questionnaires and/or forms;  Assistance during the audit process; and
 Assistance with response to audit findings and gathering support information. • Training: Casc has a positive reputation in conducting annual workshops to train City and County staff, as well as contract staff responsible for NPDES requirement implementation. Casc recognizes that these annual training sessions can be repetitive to most staff. Casc will work diligently to provide informative and interactive trainings that are focused to specifically meet the needs of the audience to promote compliance with stormwater requirements. Casc has provided training in a number of formats including one-on-one mentoring, classroom, tailgate or virtual sessions to previous and current clients. In addition to these types of training, Casc has experience in developing bulletins and training sheets for City staff. Casc has the ability maintain all training records, update City training databases, and verify that staff is up to date on current regulations. Additionally, with CGP and IGP Trainers of Record on Casc’s team, optional training 4 EXHIBIT "A" Exhibit "A" - 5
580

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES
opportunities are also available to the City, such as QSD or QISP trainings and compliance with the 2022 CGP.

PROJECT SCHEDULE
DEVELOPMENT OF TASK ORDER 1
Within one week of the execution of the contract, Casc will develop Task Order 1 for NPDES Inspections, as well as Coordination and Administrative Items.

KICK-OFF MEETING
Within one week after receipt of executed Task Order 1, the management team will coordinate a kick-off meeting. The Kick-off meeting will establish points of contact and protocols essential to the implementation of a successful project. This kick-off meeting will be conducted via Teams or Zoom and will cover both the program administration activities and the inspection program activities. The purpose of the meeting is to identify and document communication protocols, points of contact, and the City’s specific approach and policies relative to administration activities, design review expectations, inspections, reporting and other compliance assistance activities to be performed under this contract.

INSPECTION PROGRAM
Analysis and development of the inspection inventory shall begin within one week of receiving the City’s business license listing and other datafiles. This process typically takes two to three weeks. Inspections will begin one week after the development of the inventory. Inspections will be conducted weekly for the duration of the term of the contract.

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SPECIAL SERVICES
As these tasks are requested by the City, Casc will develop schedules based on the complexity of the task.

Schedules for requested tasks will be approved by the City. 5 EXHIBIT "A" Exhibit "A" - 6
581
Exhibit “A”-7
III. In addition to the requirements of Parts I and II of this Scope of Services, during the performance of the Services, Consultant will keep City appraised through periodic status reports regarding the performance of the Services under this Agreement as set forth below and in Section 5.2, by the following means:
a. In-person meetings and/or teleconferences.
b. Email updates/questions to applicant team and City while reviews are underway.
c. Conference calls.

IV. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by City. If the City determines that any work product is unacceptable, for any reason, it must be revised by Consultant without additional charge to City until found satisfactory and accepted by City. 582
Exhibit “B”-1
EXHIBIT “B”

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

TERMS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA LABOR LAW REQUIREMENTS

1. This Agreement calls for services that, in whole or in part, constitute “public works” as defined in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code (“Chapter 1”). Further, Consultant acknowledges that this Agreement is subject to (a) Chapter 1 and (b) the rules and regulations established by the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) implementing such statutes. Therefore, as to those Services that are “public works,” Consultant shall comply with and be bound by all the terms, rules and regulations described in 1(a) and 1(b) as though set forth in full herein.

2. California law requires the inclusion of specific Labor Code provisions in certain contracts. The inclusion of such specific provisions below, whether or not required by California law, does not alter the meaning or scope of Section 1 above.

3. Consultant shall be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations in accordance with California Labor Code Section 1725.5, and has provided proof of registration to City prior to the Effective Date of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform work with any subcontractor that is not registered with DIR pursuant to Section 1725.5. Consultant and subcontractors shall maintain their registration with the DIR in effect throughout the duration of this Agreement. If the Consultant or any subcontractor ceases to be registered with DIR at any time during the duration of the project, Consultant shall immediately notify City.

4. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4, Consultant’s Services are subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by DIR. Consultant shall post job site notices, as prescribed by DIR regulations.

5. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to perform the Agreement are on file at City Hall and will be made available to any interested party on request. Consultant acknowledges receipt of a copy of the DIR determination of such prevailing rate of per diem wages, and Consultant shall post such rates at each job site covered by this Agreement.

6. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1774 and 1775 concerning the payment of prevailing rates of wages to workers and the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages. The Consultant shall, as a penalty to City, forfeit $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates as determined by the DIR for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done pursuant to this Agreement by Consultant or by any subcontractor.

7. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1776, which requires Consultant and each subcontractor to: keep accurate payroll records and verify such records in writing under penalty of perjury, as specified in Section 1776; certify and make such payroll records available for inspection as provided by Section 1776; and inform City of the location of the records.
583
Exhibit “B”-2

8. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 and California Administrative Code Title 8, Section 200 et seq. concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects. Consultant shall be responsible for compliance with these aforementioned Sections for all apprenticeable occupations.

Prior to commencing work under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide City with a copy of the information submitted to any applicable apprenticeship program. Within 60 days after concluding work pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant and each of its subcontractors shall submit to City a verified statement of the journeyman and apprentice hours performed under this Agreement.

9. The Consultant shall not perform Work with any Subcontractor that has been debarred or suspended pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1777.1 or any other federal or state law providing for the debarment of contractors from public works. The Consultant and Subcontractors shall not be debarred or suspended throughout the duration of this Agreement pursuant to Labor Code Section 1777.1 or any other federal or state law providing for the debarment of contractors from public works. If the Consultant or any subcontractor becomes debarred or suspended during the duration of the project, the Consultant shall immediately notify City.

10. Consultant acknowledges that eight hours labor constitutes a legal day’s work.

Consultant shall comply with and be bound by Labor Code Section 1810. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess hours. The Consultant shall, as a penalty to City, forfeit $25.00 for each worker employed in the performance of this Agreement by the Consultant or by any subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than eight hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to Labor Code section 1815, work performed by employees of Consultant in excess of eight hours per day, and 40 hours during any one week shall be permitted upon public work upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of eight hours per day at not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay.

11. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700 provide that every employer will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1861, Consultant hereby certifies as follows:
“I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.”
Date______________ Signature___________________________ 584
Exhibit “B”-3

12. For every subcontractor who will perform work on the project, Consultant shall be responsible for such subcontractor’s compliance with Chapter 1 and Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700, and Consultant shall include in the written contract between it and each subcontractor a copy of those statutory provisions and a requirement that each subcontractor shall comply with those statutory provisions. Consultant shall be required to take all actions necessary to enforce such contractual provisions and ensure subcontractor’s compliance, including, without limitation, conducting a periodic review of the certified payroll records of the subcontractor and upon becoming aware of the failure of the subcontractor to pay his or her workers the specified prevailing rate of wages. Consultant shall diligently take corrective action to halt or rectify any failure.
585
Exhibit “C”-1
EXHIBIT “C”

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
I. Consultant shall perform the following tasks (“Tasks”) at the following rates as attached as Exhibit C-1:

II. Within the budgeted amounts for each Task, and with the approval of the Contract Officer, funds may be shifted from one Task sub-budget to another so long as the Contract Sum is not exceeded per Section 2.1, unless Additional Services are approved per Section 1.8.

III. City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include:

A. Line items for all personnel describing the Services performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate.

B. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services.

C. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation.

D. Line items for all approved sub-contractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services. 586
Exhibit “C-1”-1
EXHIBIT “C-1”
CONSULTANT’S BILLING RATE AND TASK SCHEDULE
587

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES COMPLIANCE SERVICES
Task 1: NPDES Inspections Cost Proposal
A budget has been developed for Task 1, with a total not exceeding $17,779.00. Casc estimates are based on the unit rates and estimated inspection needs provided in the table below.

The services of Casc will be invoiced monthly.

Task 1 Activity
# of Facilities
to be
Inspected
Unit Cost Estimated Task
Costs
Commercial/ Hazardous and Restaurant/
Food Inspections 67 $194.00 $12,998.00
Industrial/ SB205 Inspections
(Casc estimates based on data from

SMARTS)
13 $257.00 $3,341.00
Follow Up Inspections
(Casc estimates %15 of total inspection
inventory)
12 $120.00 $1,440.00
Estimated Total $17,779.00
EXHIBIT "C-1"
Exhibit "C-1"
588

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES COMPLIANCE SERVICES
Task 2: Environmental Compliance Special Services Hourly Rate Schedule Per Section IV.B of the RFP issued by the City; a cost proposal is not required for Task 2. Task 2 will be completed on a time and materials basis, as needed. A Task Order outlining the Scope of Work and Cost Proposal for as needed services shall be prepared and provided to the City. Task 2 will not exceed 50 hours/year.

The table below provides an hourly rate schedule for the 2024-2025 Fiscal Year. 2024-2025 FISCAL YEAR RATE SCHEDULE
Technical Director $226.00
Project Manager $175.00
Asst Project Manager $145.00
Sr. Engineer $175.00
Assistant Engineer $155.00
Senior Inspector $145.00
Field Inspector/ Program Support $130.00
GIS Specialist $120.00
Project Coordinator $100.00

REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
The following expenses will be billed at cost plus 15% unless otherwise noted:

Permits, Applications, and Fees: Includes fees for Notices of Intent (NOI), Notices of Termination (NOT), application fees, submittal fees, permit fees, and other fees required as part of the project and not paid directly by Client.

Reproduction Services: Includes blueprinting, copying, printing, and plotting. In-house plots will be billed at $6.00 per sheet for each client set and for a final in-house review set. B&W / Color copies:
$0.08 / $0.90 for 8.5 X 11 and $0.20 / $1.20 for 11 X 17.

Rental Fees: This includes rental fees paid by the firm, including required vehicles, equipment, and tools required to complete the work.

Commercial Delivery Services: Including Express Mail, Federal Express, UPS and independent courier services.

In-House Pick-Up and Delivery Services: When provided by the firm, these services will be billed at $50.00 per hour plus current IRS mileage reimbursement rates per mile round trip, with no additional markup.

Travel Expenses: Includes travel expenses incidental to performing the work, including airfare, parking, tolls, taxi, lodging, etc. Vehicle mileage will be charged at the current IRS mileage reimbursement rate per mile, without any additional markup. Travel time for professional and administrative staff will be EXHIBIT "C-1"
Exhibit "C-1"
589

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES COMPLIANCE SERVICES
billed per the hourly fee rate schedule with no additional markup and survey crews will be billed at $60 per hour, per 2-man crew.

NOTES:

Prevailing Wage: Projects and/or portions thereof designated by Client to be subject to Prevailing Wage shall be billed at the Prevailing Wage rate, plus a multiplier of approximately 3.4 for overhead and profit.

The Prevailing Wage rate shall be based upon the Wage Rate Determination issued by California’s Director of Industrial Relations for the locality and employee classification at the time the work is performed. Please contact Casc for specific project prevailing wage rates.

Waiver of Subrogation: When the client requires a Waiver of Subrogation for Workman’s Compensation Insurance, the Client will be required to pay the additional insurance premium. The approximate amount for the waiver is $250 per year.

Litigation Support and Expert Witnesses shall be at 2.0 times the above-noted hourly rates.

Annual Increase in Rate: Casc increases its rates annually, usually at the beginning of a calendar year.

A new fee rate schedule will be provided.

EXHIBIT "C-1"
Exhibit "C-1"
590
Exhibit “D”- 1
11303-0008\2344655v8.doc
EXHIBIT “D”

SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
I. Consultant shall perform all Services timely, and deliver the specified tangible work products to City in accordance with the schedule on the City’s NPDES inspection form at the frequency descrfiptd in the NPDES Permit and updating and maintaining the current spreadsheet, provided to the City monthly.

Environmental Compliance services to be provided as needed.

II. The Contract Officer may approve extensions for performance of the Services in accordance with Sections 1.8 and 3.3.
591
RFP 24-084 NPDES Inspections - Page 1 of 1
3512 14 Street
Riverside, California 92501
(951) 368-9229
[email protected]
City of Banning
99 East Ramsey Street
Banning, California 92220
Account Number: 5209534
Ad Order Number: 0011695087
Customer's Reference/PO Number:

Publication: The Press-Enterprise
Publication Dates: 10/02/2024
Total Amount: $131.48
Payment Amount: $0.00
Amount Due: $131.48
Notice ID: LWFkPBJ1ztCiqdAO2Rh7
Invoice Text: CITY OF BANNING Request for Proposal Advertisement RFP # 24-084 Project: RFP 24-084 NPDES Inspections and Environmental Compliance Services. Bids due online only, BEFORE 11:59pm Local time on November 4, 2024, Visit the City’s online bidding website for inquiries, details, instructions, and bid openings at:
\www.banningca.gov/bids.
592
RFP 24-084 NPDES Inspections - Page 1 of 1
The Press-Enterprise
3512 14 Street
Riverside, California 92501
(951) 368-9229
City of Banning
99 East Ramsey Street
Banning, California 92220
Publication: The Press-Enterprise

PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF
Ad Desc: 0011695087
FILE NO. 0011695087

PROOF OF PUBLICATION
I am a citizen of the United States. I am over the age of eighteen years and not party to or interested in the
above-entitled matter. I am an authorized representative of THE PRESS-ENTERPRISE, a newspaper of general
circulation, printed and published daily in the County of Riverside, and which newspaper has been adjudicated a
newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, under date of April 25, 1952, Case Number 54446, under date of
March 29, 1957, Case Number 65673, under date of
August 25, 1995, Case Number 267864, and under date
of September 16, 2013, Case Number RIC 1309013; that
the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said newspaper in accordance with
the instructions of the person(s) requesting publication, and not in any supplement thereof on the following
dates, to wit:
10/02/2024
I certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Date: October 2, 2024.

At: Riverside, California
______________________________
Signature
593

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES
A. STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH

GENERAL APPROACH
Casc is known for our ability to quickly respond and adapt to a variety of NPDES-related services requested by our clients. This is attributed to our technically seasoned and dedicated staff who place the City’s needs as priority. Casc has reviewed and acknowledges the Scope of Work listed in the RFP and provides the following generalized summary approach.

Project Management: With over 20 years of professional experience, Joyce Goode will serve as the Consultant NPDES Project Manager for the City. She has proven herself to be an expert in NPDES permits and a dedicated Project Manager for the City and will be the main point of contact for City staff. To provide certainty for immediate response to City requests, Casc will continue to implement a parallel style of program management to serve the City.
• Parallel Program Management: Casc proposes Parallel Program Management. This provides continual internal contact between the Project Manager and Technical Director, Melanie Sotelo. Working as a team, they are always available to meet the needs of the City via text, phone call, video conference or email, allowing for immediate response for service requests or questions/concerns.

This type of Program Management will allow Casc to serve the City as a “one-stop shop” for NPDES compliance. Our full-service water quality team is available to support the Project Manager and Technical Director to meet the needs of the City.

I. INSPECTION PROGRAM

GENERAL PROCESS
Casc’s inspectors currently provide inspection services for thousands of commercial, industrial, and restaurant facilities as well as inspection services for IC/ID investigations, construction inspections, and municipal facility inspections. Casc has a positive record of working with the business community to verify that facilities comply with permit requirements. Casc’s inspectors are experts in compliance requirements of the MS4 Permit, the Construction General Permit and the Industrial General Permit.

Services proposed include inspection services for Industrial/ SB205, Commercial, and Casc’s proposed stormwater inspection general process is detailed below.

Inspection Program Administration: The approach taken in conducting NPDES-related inspections (commercial, industrial/SB205, and restaurant) is generally the same, with subtle differences. Therefore, Casc will continue the following general inspection approach that has been fine tuned for conducting stormwaterrelated inspections. • Establish Inspection Schedule: Casc will obtain current inspection inventories from the City. The current inventory identified in the RFP cites 80 facilities would need inspections per fiscal year. Casc assumes 13 of these facilities are industrial based on a review of SMARTS. Casc assumes the remaining facilities are commercial or restaurants. If the City does not have an existing inventory, Casc will use the City’s business listing and Riverside County datafiles to identify facilities that require an inspection per the SWMP.

Development of the inspection inventory will not be included in the inspection costs for this task. Costs associated with the development of the inspection inventory will be included in the Environmental Compliance Special Services task. Casc will review the available inspection history of the current inventory Casc will serve the City as a “onestop shop” for NPDES compliance.
1 594

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES
and schedule inspections per SWMP requirements (e.g., twice a permit term or once per permit term.

Development and maintenance of the inspection schedule includes the following for consideration:
 Identify Inspection Development Type: Casc will review the type of inspection, the inspection schedule/frequency, and the scope of required NPDES-related inspections. Identify geographically similar sites to increase the number of inspections performed daily, thereby reducing overall inspection completion timelines.
 Consider peak business hours: Inspections will be scheduled to avoid peak business hours.  Language barriers: For business operators and construction sites where language barriers have the potential to cause a gap in communication regarding compliance, Casc has several bilingual inspectors to complete the inspections. Casc will also provide, as available, translated educational materials and pamphlets. Casc can also assist in the development of translated materials for the City per the City’s adopted policy requiring dual-language translation of documents and information distributed regarding educational brochures and outreach materials.
 Team Assignments: The Project Manager will assign and schedule inspections to appropriately credentialed staff (e.g., P.E., EIT, QSD, QSP, QISP, CPSWQ) depending on the scope of inspection service required. The assigned inspectors will dress professionally and conduct themselves in a manner appropriate for conducting activities as representatives of the City. • Inspection Preparation: Assigned inspectors will utilize available documentation apps to review the existing information depending on inspection type such as the project’s plan information, previous inspection reports, SMARTS database, compliance history, and project notes. • Perform Inspections: The inspector will arrive and walk the facility to observe facility layout, BMP installation, interceptors, and/or facility activities, existing and potential compliance issues, and discharges, if any. The inspector will provide verbal and educational pamphlets during the inspections. If the inspector observes any noncompliance issues, the inspector will discuss the issues with the site representative and provide recommendations for compliance.
• Documentation: The inspector will complete the inspection form using ArcGIS Survey123 that has been developed using the standardized forms in the SWMP. Use of Survey123 increases efficiency and workflow by providing the Project Management team with immediate access to the inspections. The inspections will note observations, compliance issues, and provide recommendations to the facility on how to achieve compliance with Permit requirements. Inspection reports will be generated with photographs of the inspections and provided to the facility owners/operators for their records via email or mail. • Reinspection/Follow-up: Inspectors will provide required reinspection and follow-up to verify items of noncompliance have been addressed. In Casc’s experience, approximately 15% of sites will require reinspection or follow-up services. All follow-up inspection activities will follow documentation and database requirements.
• Notices of Noncompliance and Citations: Facilities found to be in noncompliance will be discussed with City staff and enforcement actions beyond the issuance of a Notice of Noncompliance will be at the discretion of the City. The inspector will obtain photos of instances of noncompliance. Casc will notify the City of the Notice of Non Compliance, if applicable. If immediate threats to the health and safety of the 2 595

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES
public and/or the environment are observed, including illicit connections, or illegal discharges, the City will be contacted immediately.
• Notifications and Reporting: Since inspections are done in real time using Survey123, inspectors are able to notify the Program Manager via text or phone call as needed and the Project Manger is able to review findings and report areas of concerns to the City without delay. Casc will continue this approach to guarantee that notifications and reporting are enforced. • Deliverables: All inspection reports will be delivered in a pdf format and shared to the City via a OneDrive or other City preferred share folder. All inspection reports will be uploaded the share folder weekly. All inspection data will be uploaded to the share folder at the end of the contract term in csv file format.

ADDITIONAL PROCESS FOR COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL INSPECTIONS Casc will conduct the inspections to assist the City with fulfilling requirements of the Permit and SWMP. Casc will provide stormwater inspections of other facilities that pose a threat to stormwater in addition to commercial/industrial facilities as required.

Commercial/industrial inspections will also include the following steps:
• The inspector will field verify if the businesses are still operating. If businesses are no longer in operation, the inspector will update the inventory database to reflect an inspectable business is no longer at the location, or will update the database with a new facility. • Industrial facilities subject to coverage under the Industrial General Permit (IGP) will be identified and the inspector will verify the facility operator has a current Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) or a current No Exposure Certification (NEC). If the industrial facility has not obtained IGP coverage, the inspector will notify the owner or owner’s representative and provide information on obtaining coverage.

ADDITIONAL PROCESS FOR RESTAURANT INSPECTIONS
Most restaurant facilities have interceptors to separate fats, oils, and grease prior to entering the City’s sewer system. If these interceptors are not maintained properly, sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) can occur which can potentially impact the City’s MS4. If a restaurant is unable to provide maintenance records of the interceptor at the time of the inspection or during the follow-up inspection, Casc will notify the City of the potential concern.

II. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SPECIAL SERVICES
Casc will provide General NPDES Program Services as on an as needed basis as requested by the City. Task orders shall be prepared If a task item is needed, a Scope of Work would be written, and the consultant asked to provide a Cost Proposal at that time. The total hours for these services will not exceed 50 hrs/year.

Requested services will be covered by utilizing the team members that are strong in each area indicated in the Scope of Services. A generalized discussion of task items is summarized below:

Coordination and Administrative Items: Casc shall develop a task order upon the execution of the contract to address the following items:
• Kickoff Meeting: Casc will work directly with the City to coordinate a virtual kickoff meeting to establish contacts, review the parameters of the Scope, and discuss the development of as needed task orders. • Inspection Inventory Development: Casc has assisted multiple cities in the develop inspection inventories to comply with the requirements of the MS4 Permit and SWMP. Casc will coordinate with the City to obtain a current business license listing. If needed, Casc will also analyze County DEH datafiles provided by the City. Our team will analyze each facility to identify businesses that require inspection, as well as potential 3 596

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES
IGP coverage. Casc will also provide support to the Business License Department to recommend facilities that need to be reported to the Board as potential IGP non-filers. Casc will also review the City’s active business license listing and identify businesses that need to be inspected per the requirements of the SWMP.
• Administrative tasks: Administrative tasks shall include, but is not limited to, monthly billing, project oversight, and as needed assistance to the City for NPDES related inquiries.

Additional Compliance Special Services: Casc can provide additional optional support services on an as needed basis. Optional support services may include, but not limited to:
• Reports and Technical Studies, etc.: Casc will be able to assist the City with work on required reports, such as updates to the City’s FPPPs, SOPs, SWPPPs, WQMPS, and updates to Trash Amendment items • Annual Reporting: Casc has extensive experience in MS4 Permit Annual Report preparation and understands that providing the City time for review and comment on the internal draft of the report is essential. Casc will continue to provide suggested input and/or edits of proposed material to be submitted to the Regional Board. Further, Casc will work with City staff to obtain information required for reporting.

Casc will then prepare the Annual Report with two (2) internal draft review periods consisting of two (2) weeks, to allow sufficient review time.
• NPDES Permit Renewals: Casc represents current clients in the WWR region with MS4 Permit negotiations. Because of Casc’s status with CASQA, Casc also works with permit writers to influence language planned in the upcoming draft Permits.
• Inspection Fee Program: Casc has assisted several cities in the development of a fee study for implementation of the fee program for NPDES inspections. Casc can assist the City with verifications, both by desktop and during inspections, to properly prioritize businesses and update and maintain the City’s master list. Casc has established efficient coordination with the City’s Business License Department. • Regulatory Audits: Casc has extensive experience assisting other agencies with regulatory audits. Casc will draw on this experience to assist the City as needed with Permit-compliance audits. Casc has years of positive experience working with the Colorado River Regional Board staff, understanding that Regional Board audits typically focus on particular elements of the MS4 Permit stormwater programs, and will provide the following support:
 Work with City staff to obtain information and data required for the audit;  Preparation or completion of any pre-inspection questionnaires and/or forms;  Assistance during the audit process; and
 Assistance with response to audit findings and gathering support information. • Training: Casc has a positive reputation in conducting annual workshops to train City and County staff, as well as contract staff responsible for NPDES requirement implementation. Casc recognizes that these annual training sessions can be repetitive to most staff. Casc will work diligently to provide informative and interactive trainings that are focused to specifically meet the needs of the audience to promote compliance with stormwater requirements. Casc has provided training in a number of formats including one-on-one mentoring, classroom, tailgate or virtual sessions to previous and current clients. In addition to these types of training, Casc has experience in developing bulletins and training sheets for City staff. Casc has the ability maintain all training records, update City training databases, and verify that staff is up to date on current regulations. Additionally, with CGP and IGP Trainers of Record on Casc’s team, optional training 4 597

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES
opportunities are also available to the City, such as QSD or QISP trainings and compliance with the 2022 CGP.

PROJECT SCHEDULE
DEVELOPMENT OF TASK ORDER 1
Within one week of the execution of the contract, Casc will develop Task Order 1 for NPDES Inspections, as well as Coordination and Administrative Items.

KICK-OFF MEETING
Within one week after receipt of executed Task Order 1, the management team will coordinate a kick-off meeting. The Kick-off meeting will establish points of contact and protocols essential to the implementation of a successful project. This kick-off meeting will be conducted via Teams or Zoom and will cover both the program administration activities and the inspection program activities. The purpose of the meeting is to identify and document communication protocols, points of contact, and the City’s specific approach and policies relative to administration activities, design review expectations, inspections, reporting and other compliance assistance activities to be performed under this contract.

INSPECTION PROGRAM
Analysis and development of the inspection inventory shall begin within one week of receiving the City’s business license listing and other datafiles. This process typically takes two to three weeks. Inspections will begin one week after the development of the inventory. Inspections will be conducted weekly for the duration of the term of the contract.

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SPECIAL SERVICES
As these tasks are requested by the City, Casc will develop schedules based on the complexity of the task.

Schedules for requested tasks will be approved by the City. 5 598

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES
B. COMPANY INFORMATION

LOCAL ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE/KEY CONTACT
Name: Casc Engineering and Consulting, Inc.

Type: Corporation
State of Incorporation: California
Contact Person: Joyce Goode
Cell Phone: (909) 557-0276
Email: [email protected]
FIRM’S BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS

COMPANY BACKGROUND
Casc was established in 1993 to provide professional consulting services to government agencies, utility districts, and the building industry. This includes water quality, environmental, landscape architecture, civil engineering, land use planning, training, drone, and GIS services to our diverse public and private client base.

Our NPDES regulatory compliance projects include municipal program development, program management, permit renewal assistance, storm water monitoring, industrial/commercial inspections, post-construction BMP design and operation, plan checking, drone services with certified pilots, biological studies, GIS and database support, training, and storm water program staff augmentation. For each project, we assemble a multidisciplinary team selected to address our clients’ specific needs. Together, we identify, analyze and develop solutions to tackle challenges regarding storm water regulatory compliance.

We currently operate from five offices serving Southern California—Colton, Palm Desert, Temecula, Irvine, and Glendora—and also have an office in Tyler, Texas. We currently employ over 75 professionals and are a certified small business.

LEADERSHIP IN THE WATER QUALITY FIELD
Casc is a leader in the storm water profession. Our staff continues to serve in prominent positions for leading storm water professional organizations: Melanie Sotelo currently serves as a Director for the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), is Co-Chair of the CASQA Construction subcommittee, and is also the Administration Vice-President for the
International Erosion Control Association (IECA) Western Chapter. Our staff have been directly involved in developing standard-setting guidance for storm water BMPs including CASQA’s Best Management Practices Handbooks, the first edition of Caltrans’ Storm Water Quality Handbooks, and BASMAA’s “Using Site Design Techniques to Meet Development Standards for Stormwater Quality – A Companion Document to Start at the Source.” In 2017, Casc led the development of three standard-setting reports for CASQA including “LID Technical Standards Review—Bioretention and Standards Review,” “LID Technical Standards Review—Permeable Pavement Details and Standards Review,” and “LID Technical Standards Review—Future efforts related to LID.” This information is important because participating in these leadership roles brings the Casc team to the table with regulators and permit writers, working to influence permit language while establishing important relationships for liaison support. 77564 Country Club Drive, Suite 211, Palm Desert, CA
6 599

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES

LOCAL EXPERTISE
Casc’s experience with the Coachella Valley Co-Permittees includes providing stormwater training to municipal staff on the Whitewater River NPDES Permit requirements; providing the City of Palm Springs with full stormwater program management services; training Riverside County’s NPDES Coordinator; providing QSD/QSP training to County staff; providing several cities with stormwater inspection support services, including the cities of Palm Springs, Cathedral City, Palm Desert, and La Quinta; preparing Regional Board approved Final Jurisdictional Maps related to the Statewide Trash Amendment requirements; preparing work plans required by regulators; development of the region’s LID BMP Design Handbook; participating in the Co-Permittee Desert Task Force; and assisting with MS4 Permit renewal assistance and negotiations. NPDES Program Management and Administration Casc provides both comprehensive MS4 program management and staff augmentation. Casc has provided MS4 Program Management services to Palm Springs, Riverside County Transportation Department, and the cities of Industry, Hemet, and Temecula. Casc currently provides or has provided staff augmentation services where Casc staff work from agency offices to manage or assist in implementation of the agency’s storm water program. Casc provided staff augmentation services for the Riverside County Transportation Department, the County of San Bernardino, Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, the City of Highland, the City of Industry, the City of Moreno Valley, and the City of Redlands. Our services cover program development, program management, compliance review and assessments, training, annual reports, commercial/industrial inspections, BMP inspections, construction inspections, public information and outreach, and City representation at co-permittee meetings.

NPDES INSPECTIONS
Since 2003, Casc has been providing food service, hazardous material facility, commercial/industrial, construction, and BMP inspections to cities throughout Southern California to meet the varied requirements of the MS4 NPDES permits in the counties of Riverside, San Diego, Orange, Los Angeles, and San Bernardino.

Responsibilities have included tracking and inspecting hundreds of commercial/industrial facilities per agency, troubleshooting grease control devices and other BMP failures, facility prioritization, database research, educational material development and distribution, and GIS/photomapping of illicit connection/illegal discharge locations. Depending on jurisdictional requirements, non-compliance was followed up with enforcement actions in accordance with the agency’s stormwater ordinance, including assisting the city in writing Notices of Non-Compliance and referrals to the Regional Water Quality Control Board as required for compliance with the Industrial General Permit, Construction General Permit, SWMP, and SB205.

NPDES TRAINING
Casc has been a training consultant to the Riverside County Municipal Stormwater Management Program continuously since 2004. The Program covers all three NPDES permits in the county: the Whitewater River, Santa Ana River, and Santa Margarita River watersheds. Casc has been responsible for developing course content and tests, conducting the training sessions, and coordinating the delivery of the training program with the District. Casc has also been a consultant to San Bernardino County and its MS4 Permittees, providing training in WQMP review and preparation, and transportation project Low Impact Development.

The expertise of the firm in the NPDES arena is underscored by the third party training certifications/approvals held by several Casc staff: the Construction General Permit Trainer-of-Record authorized to provide QSD and QSP training, and the Industrial General Permit Trainer-of-Record authorized to provide QISP training. 7 600

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES

WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANS
 Watershed analysis
 Preliminary & final plan development
 Complete hydrological calculations
 Post-construction BMP design
 Post-construction BMP field inspection
 WQMP/SUSMP preparation
 Plan review
 Development of LID Ordinance
 Development of Green Streets Policy
 Development of WMP and IMP
 Participation in EWMP and CIMP development
 Coordination of shared monitoring for IMPs/
CIMPs
 TMDL Compliance Report preparation
 Pollutant modeling and load reduction analysis
 BMP selection for TMDL milestone achievement

STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
(SWPPP) PREPARATION/REVIEW
 Construction
 Commercial/Industrial
 Municipal and institutional facilities

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP)
 Inspection
 Design/PS&E
 Evaluation
 Application

STORM WATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
 Construction site
 Municipal
 Commercial/Industrial
 Pilot studies
 Report preparation
 TMDLs
 ASBS sites
 SW Characterization

MUNICIPAL NPDES PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT

AND IMPLEMENTATION
 Stormwater Quality Management Program
Permit implementation and compliance
 Intra-department/agency coordination
 Public Agency Activities Program
 Development planning
 Construction/Commercial/Industrial facility
inspection programs
 Facility prioritization
 Public Information and Education Outreach
program implementation
 Co-permittee representation at mandated
meetings
 Plan review
 GIS/GPS mapping
 Water quality training
 Illicit connection/illegal discharge
investigations
 Review of SWPPPs and SUSMP submittals
 LID/Green Streets

NPDES INSPECTION PROGRAMS
 Construction sites
 Industrial and Commercial facilities
 City maintenance facilities
 Food service establishments
 Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG)
 New and Redevelopment sites
 Illicit connection/illegal discharge
 Post-Construction BMPs
 Inlet inspections

WATER QUALITY TRAINING
 Storm Water Basics for Field Managers
 WQMP/SUSMP and Post Construction BMPs
 Industrial/Commercial Inspections
 Construction Site Inspections
 SWPPP/WPCP Preparation
 BMP Field Demonstration
 Sampling and Analysis
SUMMARY OF CASC’S NPDES SERVICES
8 601

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES

PARTIAL LIST OF GOVERNMENT WATER QUALITY CLIENTS
• County of Riverside
• Riverside County Flood Control District
• City of Palm Springs
• City of Cathedral City
• City of Rancho Mirage
• City of La Quinta
• City of Indio
• Coachella Valley Water District
• City of Riverside
• City of Corona
• City of Norco
• City of Moreno Valley
• City of Hemet
• City of Lake Elsinore
• City of Perris
• City of Murrieta
• City of Temecula
• Moreno Valley USD
• Corona Norco USD
• Hemet USD
• Riverside USD
• Perris Union SD
• County of San Bernardino
• San Bernardino Co. Public Works
• City of San Bernardino
• City of Hesperia
• City of Colton
• City of Grand Terrace
• City of Redlands
• City of Highland
• City of Upland
• City of Loma Linda
• City of Yucaipa
• City of Big Bear
• City of Rialto
• City of Fontana
• City of Rancho Cucamonga
• City of Montclair
• City of Ontario
• LA County Department of Public Works
• City of Pomona
• City of El Monte
• City of Industry
• City of Covina
• City of Los Angeles
• City of Anaheim
• City of Yorba Linda
• City of Tustin
• City of San Dimas
• City of Manhattan Beach
• City of Santa Clarita
• City of Pacoima
• Los Angeles USD
• UCLA
• Burbank-Pasadena-Glendale Airport
• Los Angeles World Airports (LAX/VNY/ONT)
• Metropolitan Water District
• County of Orange
• City of Irvine
• City of Costa Mesa
• Santa Ana USD
• Capistrano USD
• John Wayne International Airport
• County of San Diego
• SANBAG
• SANDAG
• City of Sacramento
• City of Elk Grove
• City of Davis
• City of Modesto
• City of Fremont
• Elk Grove USD
• University of California, Berkeley
• Caltrans
• Texas DOT
• Arizona DOT
• March ARB
9 602

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES
C. PROJECT TEAM AND ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF KEY STAFF
Casc offers a highly qualified team of professionals designed to assist the City with NPDES program support services. The proposed key team members and support staff listed here are particularly well-suited for this work given their extensive experience in the storm water industry, their familiarity with state and federal regulations, as well as their current work performing similar duties for many local agencies. Based on the Project Manager’s and Key Team’s careful evaluation of the Scope of Services, the availability of key team members and support staff is sufficient to meet the needs of the City.

This section serves as an introduction to Casc’s team. Team resumes included herein provide more information on experience and qualifications.

Joyce Goode
Project Manager
20 years’ experience
Melanie Sotelo
Technical Advisor
35 years’ experience
Louis Flores
Program Support/
Field Inspector
15 years’ experience
Brian Taylor
Program Support/
Field Inspector
5 years’ experience
Samantha Brewer
Asst. Project Manager
3 years’ experience
Coral Fenech
GIS Specialist
15 years’ experience
Joe Rosales
Senior Inspector
22 years’ experience
Michael Gentile
Senior Engineer
33 years’ experience
10 603

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES

KEY TEAM MEMBERS
Melanie Sotelo, M.S.E., CPMSM, CPSWQ, CPESC, QISP, QSD/P, ToR CGP. Melanie will serve as the Technical Director by providing overall stormwater program assessment and implementation support services. Melanie brings over 35 years of experience providing NPDES stormwater program management assistance services. She has served as a contract NPDES Project Manager for Riverside County and is currently providing the County with NPDES support, as well as currently serving as the MS4 Project Manager for the City of Palm Springs. As Project Manager she has completed more than 30 individual projects and/or contracts involving NPDES activities with similar phases and elements of work associated with the proposed scope of work. Recent projects include:
• City of Palm Springs Stormwater Program Management Services • Riverside County Transportation Department NPDES Coordination and Stormwater Program Support Services
• City of Hemet Stormwater Program Management Assistance • City of Norco NPDES Program Management Services
• City of Hesperia NPDES Program Management Services
• City of Pomona NPDES Program Management Services
• City of Rancho Mirage NPDES Program Management Services • Southern California Edison NPDES Support Services
• Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Support Services • City of Highland NPDES Support and WQMP Review Services • San Bernardino County Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and Transportation BMP Guidance Training
• Water Quality Management Plan Review Services for the City of Moreno Valley and the City of Montclair
Joyce Goode, CPESC, QSD/P. Joyce will serve as the Project Manager. Her career is focused on NPDES permit compliance and she is an expert in the Industrial General Permit, Construction General Permit, and MS4 Permits. Joyce assists multiple municipalities with their NPDES programs, and she is currently leading teams in the development of GIS-based applications for management of compliance activities to meet the requirements of MS4 Permits.

Samantha Brewer. Samantha will serve as the Assistant Project Manager. She is actively involved with Casc’s stormwater group, providing commercial industrial inspections, on-call illicit connection/illegal discharge response services, and construction site SWPPP inspections on SCE and homebuilding projects.

Joe Rosales, CPMSM, CESSWI, QSP, QISP. Joe has extensive experience in regulatory inspections for industrial and commercial facilities in cities throughout Riverside County, including several years in Palm Springs. In addition, he is a skilled graduate civil engineer specializing in hydrology, hydraulics, SWPPPs and WQMPs.

Micheal Gentile, P.E., QSD/P
Mr. Gentile will serve as the Senior Engineer by providing WQMP reviews in a timely manner and can also provide engineering, hydrology, and flood plain mapping support as needed. He currently provides similar services to Riverside County, Cities of Highland and Hemet. Mr. Gentile has more than 30 years of experience in project management, project engineering, design, and production for a wide variety of civil engineering projects.
11 604

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES

SUB-CONSULTANT FIRMS
Casc has sufficient resources and expertise within the firm and does not propose to utilize sub-consultant firms.

NAME CONTACT NO. PE CPMSM CPSWQ CPESC CESSWI QSD QSP QISP TOR Melanie Sotelo 909-835-0313 406 913 5693 00225 00225 00685  Joyce Goode 909-557-0276 8448 25905 25905 01315
Michael Gentile 909-809-0035 58953 01162
Joe Rosales 909-241-6212 219 1223 00419 01316
Samantha Brewer 650-766-4321 In progress In progress
Louis Flores 909-264-0060 4940 26490 00940
Brian Taylor 909-553-2600 8126 28241 01317
Licenses and Certifications
PE– Professional Engineer
GIT – Geologist in Training
CESSWI—Certified Erosion Sediment and Storm Water Inspector QSD – Qualified SWPPP Developer
QSP – Qualified SWPPP Practitioner
QISP – Qualified Industrial Stormwater Practitioner
TORcgp – Construction General Permit Trainer-of-Record

LIST OF LICENSES AND CERTIFICATIONS
The Casc team holds professional registrations and/or credentials that attest to their knowledge, skills, and abilities so that the City can have exceptional confidence in the team. 12 605

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES

JOYCE GOODE, CPESC, QSD/P

PROJECT MANAGER
Ms. Goode’s career as a Project Manager is
focused on NPDES permit compliance and she is
an expert in the Industrial General Permit,
Construction General Permit, and MS4 Permits.

Ms. Goode assists multiple municipalities with
managing compliant programs. She is currently leading teams in the development of GIS-based applications for management of NPDES compliance activities to meet the requirements of MS4 Permits.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
NPDES Inspections, City of Palm Springs: Ms. Goode is the Assistant Project Manager for the NPDES inspection program for the City of Palm Springs. She organizes and utilizes resources to complete tasks to comply with regulatory requirements for all Riverside County MS4 Whitewater River Region compliance-related inspections: commercial, industrial, municipal, IC/ID and construction. She uses local, state and federal databases to identify sites that meet the criteria for inspections under current permitting requirements. Ms. Goode also provides oversight for all inspection staff and program activities. As part of the inspection program, Ms. Goode has assembled and leads a team in the development of a fully interactive inspection program using GIS software. The interactive program integrates GIS-based applications for the collection/editing of map data and form data for all inspections. She works regularly with City staff to provide inspection updates, recommendations regarding NPDES compliance, and reporting data. Ms. Goode develops innovative training classes for the field and classroom environments to educate City and consulting staff on NPDES-related topics.

Commercial/Industrial Inspections, Cathedral City: Ms. Goode was the Assistant Project Manager for the NPDES inspection program for Cathedral City. She attended and led kick-off meetings and progress meetings as needed via conference calls or web based communication platforms. Ms. Goode assisted in the review of the City’s Annual Reports during the contract term. She also assisted the City’s NPDES coordinator in identifying commercial and industrial businesses within the City’s jurisdiction that meet inspection criteria per the MS4 Permit and SWMP. Ms. Goode provided oversight of all inspections and provided updates to the City. She informed the City of potential or immediate threats to water quality.

She managed the project budget and prepared monthly progress reports to the City.

Commercial/Industrial Inspections, City of La Quinta: Ms. Goode is Assistant Project Manager for the NPDES inspection program for the City of La Quinta. Ms. Goode evaluated facilities within the City’s jurisdiction to determine if the facilities met the inspection criteria per the MS4 Permit and SWMP. She updated the City’s inspection inventory with new commercial and industrial businesses and provided recommendations for existing facilities. She also works with the City’s NPDES Coordinator to determine which facilities are compliant with the current Permit inspection frequency and which facilities need additional inspections. Ms. Goode developed a 3-year inspection schedule for all inventoried facilities and provides oversight of all inspections
Commercial/Industrial Inspections, City of Temecula: Ms. Goode is the Project Manager for the Commercial and Industrial facilities inspection program for the City of Temecula. She has developed inspection standards that comply with the Riverside County MS4 Permit Santa Margarita Region, the Santa Margarita Watershed Water Quality Improvement Plan, and the City’s Jurisdictional Runoff Management Plan (JRMP). Ms. Goode utilizes City databases and GIS software to construct a 5-year inspection program for over 4,000 facilities. As part of the program, Ms. Goode also analyzes the Education:

B.S./Environmental Geology /
California State University/ San
Bernardino, CA
Professional Registrations/
Affiliations:
• Certified Professional in
Erosion and Sediment
Control (CPESC) No. 8448
• California Stormwater
Quality Association -
Qualified SWPPP Developer
and Qualified SWPPP
Practitioner (QSD/P)
Certification No. 25905
13 606

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES
activities of each facility and its proximity to a 303(d)/TMDL listed waterbody to provide recommendations to the City to assist in identifying High Priority facilities.

NPDES Compliance Program, City of Hemet: Ms. Goode is the Assistant Project Manager for the NPDES Compliance Program for the City of Hemet. She has worked closely with the City’s NPDES coordinator to develop a compliant commercial and industrial inspection program including a GISbased interactive inspection program using mobile and web apps that are used by both consulting and City staff. Ms. Goode also attends monthly LE/CL TMDL Task Force meetings and represents the City’s interests during TMDL development. She also leads project kick-off meetings and project progress meetings with City staff. She assists in the preparation of the City’s Annual Report and she provides oncall assistance with compliance measures related to the MS4 Permit, DAMP, LID and Trash Provision requirements. Ms. Goode also provides evaluations of existing LID and Facility Pollution Prevention Plans and updates as needed. She develops training programs and provides training to City and field staff regarding MS4 compliance. Ms. Goode prepares monthly project reports and manages the overall schedule and budget of the project. She verifies that tasks are completed on time and per contract terms.

Commercial/Industrial and FOG Inspections, City of Montclair: Ms. Goode is the Project Manager for the NPDES Inspection program for the City of Hemet. She works with the City’s NPDES coordinator to identify commercial and industrial businesses within the City’s jurisdiction that meet inspection criteria per the San Bernardino County Phase I MS4 Permit Santa Ana Region. Ms. Goode trains and assists staff in using the County’s stormwater management software to complete inspections and review compliance history of facilities. She also provides oversight for FOG inspections to verify compliance with the City’s FOG Program.

NPDES Training Services, Riverside County FC&WCD: Ms. Goode is a trainer for the County’s NPDES training program. She assists with coordinating the delivery of the training program with the District, developing course content, and instructing training sessions. Ms. Goode is currently providing training for the Commercial Industrial program for the Santa Ana River Watershed, Santa Margarita Watershed, and the Whitewater River watershed.

JOYCE GOODE, CONTINUED
14 607

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES

MELANIE SOTELO, MSE, CPMSM, CPSWQ,

CPESC, QSD/P, QISP, TORCGP

TECHNICAL ADVISOR
Ms. Sotelo has more than 20 years of
professional experience including over 12 years
in the specialized field of NPDES stormwater
permit compliance. She possesses extensive
knowledge of California’s NPDES Construction, Municipal (MS4), Industrial permits and the Statewide Trash Amendments, and has participated in CASQA’s On-Land Visual Assessment Training where she conducted field assessments during the hands-on training. She is responsible for providing guidance in selection and implementation of trash provision compliance activities for several municipalities in the Santa Ana River and the Whitewater River watersheds in Southern California. Ms. Sotelo has worked extensively with the State Water Resources Control Board, the Santa Ana Regional Board, the Colorado River Regional Board, and the Los Angeles Regional Board. She has been a course instructor for classes related to the Construction General Permit, Riverside County Santa Ana River and Whitewater River watersheds’ NPDES MS4 Permits, San Bernardino County’s NPDES MS4 Permit, and also drafted the City of El Monte’s Green Streets Policy and LID Ordinance in compliance with the current Los Angeles NPDES MS4 Permit .

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
City of Palm Springs Stormwater Project Manager: Casc is currently under contract with the City of Palm Springs for NPDES services, with Ms. Sotelo serving as the City’s Storm Water Project Manager.

Ms. Sotelo is acting as an extension of staff to provide guidance and implement requirements of the Whitewater River Watershed to ensure the City remains in compliance with its MS4 Permit and Statewide Trash Amendments. She attends Desert Task Force Meetings as a representative of the City. Her duties include oversight of construction inspections, commercial/industrial inspections, municipal staff training, policy and ordinance reviews and modifications, WQMP program guidance, IC/ID notifications and investigations, trash amendment services, and other activities related to general NPDES requirements.

City of Cathedral City and La Quinta: Casc is currently under contract with the cities of Cathedral City and La Quinta to provide NPDES inspection services. Ms. Sotelo serves as the Project Manager for both agencies and is responsible for oversight and resources related to meeting inspection requirements per the WWR MS4 Permit.

City of Hemet Stormwater Program Assistance: Casc is currently under contract with the City of Hemet to provide Stormwater Program Management assistance services. Ms. Sotelo serves as the Project Manager for commercial/industrial and restaurant facility inspections conducted by Casc and City staff. Ms. Sotelo provides oversight and training to City staff, providing ongoing training of existing Education:
• M.S. Engineering -
Environmental Systems/
University of California
Riverside
• B.S. with Honors/
Environmental Science/
University of Phoenix, AZ
Professional Registrations/
Affiliations:
• CASQA Board of Directors
(2021-2024); Executive
Program Committee (2014-
Present); Co-Chair
Construction Subcommittee
• International Erosion Control
Association, Western Chapter
(2018 - Present) – Director,
Administrative Vice President
• Certified Professional in Storm
Water Quality (CPSWQ) No.
913
• Certified Professional in
Erosion and Sediment Control
(CPESC) No. 5693
• Certified Professional in
Municipal Stormwater
Management (CPMSM) No.
406
• California Stormwater Quality
Association - Trainer of
Record, Construction General
Permit
• California Stormwater Quality
Association - Qualified SWPPP
Developer and Qualified
SWPPP Practitioner (QSD/P)
Certification No. 225
• California Stormwater Quality
Association - Qualified
Industrial Stormwater
Practitioner (QISP)
Certification No. 685
15 608

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES
staff on the implementation of the Santa Ana River MS4 Permit. Ms. Sotelo represents the City at the Santa Ana River Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meetings, the SAR/SMR BMP Development Subcommittee meetings, and the Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force. She also provides oversight and guidance of the City’s Statewide Trash Amendment planning and mapping activities.

Riverside County Transportation Department NPDES Coordination and Stormwater Program Support Services: Casc is currently under contract with County Transportation to provide Stormwater Program Management Assistance Services. Ms. Sotelo served as Transportation Department’s Interim NPDES Coordinator, provided training to the current NPDES Coordination and continues to provide NPDES support to staff on the implementation of County’s three NPDES MS4 Permits. Ms. Sotelo is currently representing the Santa Ana River Watershed on the Public Information and Education Subcommittee, attends Co-Permittee TAC meetings and upcoming Permit negotiations. She also oversees planning and mapping activities related to the Statewide Trash Amendments.

Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Support Services: Casc is currently participating in the Lake Elsinore TMDL Task on behalf of the City of Hemet. Casc attends meetings, reviews proposed TMDL modifications, and provides comments and input on language, implementation, approach and methodology, and calculator tools.

Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and Transportation BMP Guidance Training, San Bernardino County: As part of Casc’s experienced Water Quality Training Team, Ms. Sotelo was responsible for the development and co-presentation of the County’s WQMP training for San Bernardino County agencies and the public. Additionally, Ms. Sotelo was responsible for the development of training for the County’s Transportation BMP Guidance document that was presented to agency staff. Training covered feasibility determination for implementation of LID BMPs in both public and private projects, including selection of BMPs based on the hierarchy of LID BMP implementation.

Green Streets Policy, Low Impact Development (LID) Ordinance, and Reasonable Assurance Analysis, City of El Monte: Ms. Sotelo served as the team lead for the preparation of the City of El Monte’s Green Streets Policy and LID Ordinance. Both ordinances were written to comply with the LA County MS4 NPDES Permit’s LID BMP implementation requirements. Language addressed the LID BMP hierarchy including implementation of infiltration and bioretention BMPs before moving on to biofiltration BMPs. Policy and ordinance language also included methodology for determining minimum LID BMP design details and requirements. Ms. Sotelo also assisted the Storm Water Program Manager with calculations and analysis for the City’s reasonable assurance analysis for pollutant trends in existing BMPs to determine compliance with target limitations and required mitigation adjustments.

Water Quality Management Plan Review Services for the County of Riverside, City of Highland, City of Moreno Valley, City of Montclair and the City of Hemet: Casc is currently under contract with the County of Riverside, City of Highland, City of Moreno Valley, City of Montclair, and the City of Hemet to provide Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Review Services and assistance. Ms. Sotelo is responsible for managing, coordinating, and leading plan check reviews for WQMPs submitted to Riverside County, the City of Highland, and the City of Moreno Valley. She also provides WQMP review assistance to the City of Montclair and the City of Hemet as needed. Ms. Sotelo has conducted over one hundred reviews of Preliminary and Final WQMPs submitted for approval under the guidelines of the California Stormwater Quality Association, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the San Diego Regional Water Quality Board.

MELANIE SOTELO, CONTINUED
16 609

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES
MICHAEL GENTILE, P.E., QSD/P

SENIOR ENGINEER
Mr. Gentile has nearly 30 years of experience in
project management, project engineering, design,
and production for a wide variety of civil
engineering projects. Mr. Gentile has developed a
deep understanding of stormwater permit
requirements and regulations and has used this knowledge to benefit public sector clients by helping them achieve and maintain compliance with stormwater requirements. He manages a highly skilled team of reviewers that plan check WQMP and civil improvement plans for Riverside County, City of Moreno Valley, City of Temecula, and others.

Mr. Gentile currently provides expert peer review services for various public sector clients and provides WQMP training to Riverside County.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and Hydrology Study Plan Checking, Riverside County:

Mr. Gentile manages Casc’s plan check team, providing WQMP and hydraulic/hydrology review services for the Riverside County Transportation Department. The review program in Riverside County requires knowledge of stormwater permit requirements in three watersheds: Whitewater River (Colorado River Basin Region 7), Santa Ana River (Santa Ana Region 8), and Santa Margarita River (San Diego Region 9). The plan check team provides collaboration with WQMP applicants, preparers, and county staff to assist in assessing the feasibility, design, and implementation of the LID BMPs to meet permit requirements. WQMP reviews include examination of construction drawings (grading, drainage, street plans, utilities, and landscaping) to verify they align with the approach and design documented within the WQMP. The team also reviews hydrology studies for compliance with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Hydrology Manual, as stormwater retention requirements are part of development requirements in the Coachella Valley.

NPDES Compliance Services - City of Temecula: Mr. Gentile provides valuable assistance to the City of Temecula’s implementation of their stormwater program. He has not only reviewed Water Quality Management Plans but has also prepared WQMPs for the City of Temecula for specific public works projects. These plans document the stormwater credits earned under the WQE framework, and Mr. Gentile is currently helping to develop procedures for managing these credits. He has provided guidance on implementation of stormwater requirements for various projects (public and private) throughout the City in support of their NPDES compliance goals.

Statewide Trash Provisions Compliance Services for the City of La Quinta: Mr. Gentile was the project manager responsible for creating a jurisdictional map and method to adhere to statewide trash provisions under Water Code Section 13383. The Colorado Regional Board required the City of La Quinta to submit its compliance method on June 1, 2017. The city opted to have Casc perform trash assessments and develop justifications for equivalent alternative land use as part of its final jurisdictional map development, which Mr. Gentile managed along with a follow-up technical memorandum at the City’s request.

Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Training, Riverside County: Mr. Gentile has conducted training sessions for Water Quality Management Plans in the Whitewater River Watershed in compliance with the current stormwater permit. The training included sections on Whitewater River watershed characteristics, regulatory framework, WQMP concepts, low impact development, two BMP design examples: infiltration basin and infiltration trench, and BMP operations and maintenance.

EDUCATION:

B.A ./ Physics / Carleton
College / Northfield, MN

PROFESSIONAL

REGISTRATIONS/
AFFILIATIONS:
• Professional Civil
Engineer California /
#058953
• Qualified SWPPP
Developer and Qualified
SWPPP Practitioner
(QSD/P) #01162
17 610

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES

JOE ROSALES, CPMSM, CESSWI, QSP

SENIOR INSPECTOR
Mr. Rosales has more than 35 years of
professional experience with a municipality, with
over 17 years specializing in NPDES compliance.

He administered the stormwater program for the
City of Montclair. He also served as Chairperson
for San Bernardino County’s stormwater Public Education subcommittee, and Chairperson for the County’s stormwater database, playing an intricate role in revamping the application to better serve all permittees. Mr. Rosales understands firsthand the challenges municipal governments face implementing the NPDES Permit.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
City of Palm Springs and Rancho Mirage: Casc is currently under contract with the cities of Palm Springs and Rancho Mirage to provide NPDES inspection services. Mr. Rosales serves as a back-up inspector for both agencies to ensure commercial and construction projects are inline with meeting requirements per the WWR MS4 Permit.

City of Pomona: Casc is currently under contract with the City of Pomona to provide NPDES inspection services and Fats, Oils and Grease (FOG) Program. Mr. Rosales serves as the Lead Inspector for Pomona and is responsible for oversight and resources related to meeting inspection requirements per the Los Angeles MS4 Permit.

City of Rialto: Casc is currently under contract with the City of Rialto to provide Stormwater Program Management assistance services. Mr. Rosales serves as the Assistant Project Manager for commercial/ industrial and restaurant inspections, including Fats, Oil and Grease (FOG) Program interceptor inspections conducted by Casc and City staff. Mr. Rosales provides oversight and training to City staff, providing ongoing training of existing staff on the implementation of the Santa Ana River MS4 Permit and the Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements for Sanitary Sewer Systems Order NO. 2006 -0003-DWG. Mr. Rosales represents the City at San Bernardino County’s Permittee General Meetings, and the Public Education subcommittee.

NPDES Inspections, Montclair, CA: Mr. Rosales supervised industrial/commercial inspectors and has an exemplary reputation as a “field trainer” for commercial and industrial inspections. He conducted thousands of industrial/commercial inspections, and also served as a SWPPP inspector, stormwater treatment device installation inspector associated with the WQMP, and post-construction BMP inspector.

Stormwater Project Manager, Montclair, CA: Mr. Rosales assisted with implementation of the NPDES Permit for the City of Montclair. He updated, revised and created municipal ordinances to comply with all federal and state stormwater regulations. He also assisted with the review of CEQA documents to ensure compliance with all federal, state, and local stormwater regulations. He established and oversaw a Water Quality Management Plan program for the City to guarantee compliance with federal, state, and local laws. He also developed and managed the City's stormwater budget to ensure compliance with permits and to maintain the City's financial stability. He helped create the Comprehensive Bacteria Reduction Plan for the Dry Weather Flow TMDL and implemented a plan to demonstrate that the City of Montclair was a non-significant discharger to the Santa Ana River.

Additionally, he set up the Illicit Connection/Illegal Discharge (IC/ID) program for the City and developed an educational program for the residents.

Education:
• Various Coursework, University
of California, Riverside
Professional
Registrations/ Affiliations:
• CPMSM Certification (CA, No. 219)
• CESSWI Certification (CA, No.
1223)
• QSP Certification (CA, No. 1223)
• Certified Environmental Compliance Inspector Grade 1 (CA, No. 0274119)
18 611

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES

LOUIS FLORES, CESSWI, QSP/D, QISP

PROGRAM SUPPORT/FIELD INSPECTOR
Louis Flores joined the Casc Water Quality
Department in December 2016. He is a Certified
Erosion Sediment and Stormwater Inspector, a
Qualified Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Practitioner, and a Qualified Industrial Stormwater Practitioner and has over ten years of experience in the engineering, surveying, and construction field. He is currently actively involved with Casc’s stormwater group providing commercial industrial inspections, on-call illicit connection/illegal discharge response services, and construction site SWPPP inspections as a City Inspector and as the QSP for construction projects. He educates business owners, industrial business owners and managers, construction site operators, and private homeowners about proper stormwater pollution prevention measures.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Commercial/Industrial Facility Inspections, City of Palm Springs, Cathedral City, La Quinta, Hemet:

Mr. Flores has conducted inspections of Commercial-Industrial Facilities to determine compliance with the local, state, and federal stormwater ordinances. He has evaluated restaurants using fats, oils, and grease, auto repair service facilities, retail gasoline stations, garden nurseries, and industrial facilities for proper stormwater pollution prevention measures. He has inspected and verified BMP design and performance of facilities under the Industrial General Permit and facilities under a No Exposure Certification (NEC). He has reviewed the facilities to be inspected on the State Water Board’s Storm Water Multiple Application and Reporting Tracking System (SMARTS) to verify coverage and site history with compliance and previous inspections from the State and Regional Water Boards. He follows up on re-inspection and enforcement actions as necessary.

Construction Site Inspections and Illicit Connection/Illegal Discharge On-Call Response Services, City of Palm Springs: Mr. Flores has conducted inspections of privately owned and City owned construction projects to determine compliance with the City of Palm Springs, the County of Riverside, and State of California Stormwater Ordinances. He evaluates active construction sites for proper stormwater pollution prevention measures and submits findings to the City of Palm Springs and to the site operators. Mr. Flores has responded to dozens of citizen complaints regarding the discharge and illicit connections of the transfer of pollutants and materials in the form of solids and liquids including but not limited to: fats, oils and grease, human waste, construction/building materials, trash, air conditioning condensation, commercial industrial discharge operations, swimming pool and pond maintenance discharge operations, and excessive irrigation water discharge.

NPDES Compliance Field Review Inspections, Corona-Norco Unified School District: Mr. Flores conducts NPDES construction compliance inspections for public school projects for the Corona-Norco Unified School District. He evaluates them for proper stormwater pollution prevention measures and compliance with the state of California Construction General Permit. He reports findings to the construction site superintendents and to the school district.

California Department of Transportation – Monitoring Decommissioning Program, Los Angeles County: Mr. Flores was part of a decommissioning team for the Water Quality Monitoring Program for California Department of Transportation. His duties included collecting field measurements, grab samples, photographic evidence and automated equipment readings of stormwater runoff occurring off Interstate 210 in Sylmar, California.

Education:

B.S. / Environmental Science/
University of California -
Riverside
Professional Certifications/
Affiliations:
▪ Certified Erosion Sediment
Stormwater Inspector
(CESSWI) No. 4940
▪ Qualified Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan
Practitioner (QSP) No.
26490
▪ Qualified Industrial
Stormwater Practitioner
(QISP) No. 00940
▪ Cal/OSHA Confined Space
Entry
19 612

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES

COMPLIANCE SERVICES BRIAN TAYLOR, CESSWI, QISP, QSD/P

PROGRAM SUPPORT/FIELD INSPECTOR
Mr. Taylor joined the Casc Water Quality Department
in October 2021. He is a Certified Erosion Sediment
and Stormwater Inspector, a Qualified Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan Practitioner, and a
Qualified Industrial Stormwater Practitioner. He has
previous experience as a Laboratory Research Associate collaborating with the molecular biology team, and assisting with antibody engineering. Since coming to Casc, Mr. Taylor performs a variety of duties in support of water quality. He conducts NPDES inspections for construction, commercial, and industrial facilities, performs on-call illicit connection/illegal discharge response services, and assists stormwater monitoring teams in the field and with reporting.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Commercial/Industrial Facility Inspections, City of Palm Springs: Mr. Taylor carried out inspections of commercial and industrial facilities to enforce stormwater compliance regulations. He assessed businesses, restaurants, and industrial sites to verify proper implementation of stormwater pollution prevention measures. Mr. Taylor documented inspection data, identified violations, and communicated findings to responsible parties. He provided education on effective pollution prevention practices and conducted follow-up inspections as needed. His expertise in enforcing stormwater regulations contributed to safeguarding water resources and maintaining a sustainable environment for the City of Palm Springs.

City of Palm Springs Construction Site Inspections, City of Palm Springs: Mr. Taylor served as a stormwater compliance inspector for construction sites, both private projects and capital improvement planning (CIP). He conducted thorough inspections of construction projects to verify compliance with the City of Palm Springs, County of Riverside, and State of California Stormwater Ordinances. Mr. Taylor assessed active construction sites for the proper implementation of stormwater pollution prevention measures. He documented field data and provided education on effective stormwater pollution prevention practices to the responsible parties. If deficiencies were present he would follow up and re-inspect when necessary.

City of Montclair Construction Site Inspections: Mr. Taylor is a stormwater compliance inspector for privately owned construction sites within the City of Montclair. His responsibilities include conducting thorough inspections to ensure compliance with the Stormwater Ordinances for the City of Montclair, County of San Bernardino, and State of California. Mr. Taylor evaluates active construction sites to verify the implementation of effective stormwater pollution prevention measures. He documents field inspection data and promptly communicates findings to the City of Montclair and site operators.

Additionally, he focuses on educating responsible parties about suitable stormwater pollution prevention measures. Mr. Taylor also conducts follow-up inspections as needed to verify ongoing compliance.

QSP Construction Site Inspection Services, Southern California Edison: Mr. Taylor delivers QSP SWPPP Inspection Services for a range of Southern California Edison construction projects. He assesses active construction sites, verifying proper stormwater pollution prevention practices are in place. He identifies and reports BMP deficiencies to on-site construction superintendents and Southern California Edison representative. He collaborates with the project's QSD to file SWPPP amendments, maintaining compliance with regulations.

Education:

B.S. Biochemistry, University of
California, Riverside
Professional Certifications/
Affiliations:
▪ Certified Erosion Sediment
Stormwater Inspector
(CESSWI) No. 8126
▪ Qualified Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan
Practitioner (QSP) No.
28241
▪ Qualified Industrial
Stormwater Practitioner
(QISP) No. 01317
20 613

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES

SAMANTHA BREWER

ASSISTANT PROJECT MANAGER
Ms. Brewer joined Casc Water Quality Department
in December 2021. She is currently in the process
of obtaining her certification for the QISP and QSP
certifications. Ms. Brewer is actively involved with
Casc’s stormwater group, providing commercial
industrial inspections, on-call illicit connection/illegal discharge response services, and construction site SWPPP inspections on SCE and homebuilding projects. She educates business owners, industrial business owners and managers, construction site operators, and private homeowners about proper stormwater pollution prevention measures.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Environmental Analyst, Colton, CA: Ms. Brewer is an office and field team member for private and public water quality clients. She assists with preparing SWPPPs, COIs, and NOTs to meet the terms of the California Construction General Permit (CGP), assists with field inspections, prepares spreadsheets to summarize data, edits prMs. Brewer is a member of the office and field team for private and public water quality clients. Her responsibilities include assisting in the preparation of SWPPPs, COIs, and NOTs to ensure compliance with the terms of the California Construction General Permit (CGP). She also helps with field inspections, prepares spreadsheets to summarize data, edits presentation materials, assists in presenting training modules, and proofreads and edits documents. esentation materials, assists in presenting training modules, and proofreads and edits documents.

Commercial / Industrial Facility Inspections, City of Palm Springs/ City of Palm Desert/ City of Cathedral City: Ms. Brewer has conducted inspections of Commercial-Industrial Facilities to determine compliance with city stormwater ordinances. She has evaluated businesses, restaurants, and commercial/industrial facilities for proper stormwater pollution prevention measures. She recorded field inspection data and submitted findings to the responsible parties. She educated the responsible parties on suitable stormwater pollution prevention housekeeping. measures and followed up on re-inspection if necessary.

Traditional Construction Site Inspections, D R Horton: Ms. Brewer has conducted inspections of Construction sites weekly to determine compliance with state water quality requirements. She inspects each site before a qualifying storm event to ensure proper BMPs are in place. She also inspects during and after each event to verify BMP effectiveness. She has experience verifying weather conditions using the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) website. She generates reports to record the findings of the inspections and coordinates with project managers to ensure the proper changes are being implemented.

Linear Utility Construction Site Inspections, Southern California Edison: Ms. Brewer conducts weekly site inspections for Southern California Edison Linear Utility pole projects. She ensures proper BMP installation and verifies that soil cover is reinstated after installation has been completed. To supplement the inspections she uses CloudCompli database to generate inspection reports and verify site weather conditions.

Education:

B.A. Criminology and Justice
Studies / California State
University, San Marcos, CA
▪ California State University
San Marcos- Academic
Dean’s list four consecutive
semesters (2018- 2020)
▪ CSUSM Research
Symposium - Awarded for
Sociological research
presented Spring 2019.
21 614

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES

CORAL FENECH

GIS SPECIALIST
Ms. Fenech is an expert in the GIS field,
utilizing a wide variety of platforms,
including ArcGIS software (Pro, Online,
Enterprise, Survey123, and Field Maps),
and Pro Extensions (3D Analyst, Spatial Analyst, Image
Analyst, Data Reviewer, and Workflow Manager), Microsoft Power Automate, Utility Network, Suitability Modeler, Arc Hydro Data Model, Eos Arrow GPS, Juniper Geode GPS,
Python, Arcade, SQL, and Smartsheet Project Management
Software. Ms. Fenech possesses an extensive understanding of cartographic and graphic design principles for map
production in print and online. She is skilled in statistical analysis and geodatabase design, creation, and management.

Ms. Fenech has extensive experience in analyzing technical documents and environmental analyses for programmaticlevel projects.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE:

City of Montclair, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Inspection Application, Montclair, CA:

Ms. Fenech developed the NPDES Inspection Application for the City of Montclair. The application is used for inspections and reporting in various areas including Commercial/
Industrial/Restaurant, Construction, Post Construction, Municipal Facilities, and IC/ID Investigations. She utilized ArcGIS Survey123 Connect and XLSForm development to
create smart forms with automation that link to the Field Maps Application and Survey123, with report templates generated in Survey123. Once completed, Ms.

Fenech transferred the NPDES Inspection Application to the City of Montclair ArcGIS Online Organization for the City to manage.

City of Norco, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), Riverside County, CA:

Ms. Fenech built the GIS schema in ArcGIS Desktop Advanced to seamlessly integrate into City of Norco’s GIS-powered Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) software, Lucity (which has since been acquired by CentralSquare) for NPDES compliant data collection. She worked closely with the City and their GIS Consultant to build the NPDES GIS schema and link to their EAM software. She provided workflow documentation and recommendations for collecting NPDES-compliant Commercial/Industrial and Food Facility GIS data. The finalized Geodatabase was then delivered by Ms. Fenech for successful integration into the City's Lucity EAM software.

City of Palm Springs, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), Riverside County, CA:

Ms. Fenech built and managed the GIS database in ArcGIS Desktop Advanced for the Commercial/ Industrial/Food Business Inspections from 2015 to 2019. She created AGOL Web Maps for ArcGIS Collector and generated smart forms in Survey123 Connect using XLSForm with formulas and data validation. She built in the ability to link directly to the NPDES Survey123 forms from data selected in ArcGIS Collector and pass parameters to populate the linked fields in the Survey123 form. She also built report templates in Survey123 for the business inspections and set up weekly automated reporting using Webhooks in Integromet (now known as Make).

EDUCATION:
• B.A./Geography/GIS Certification/
California State University, Long Beach
 Special Topics Study in Remote
Sensing and Digital Image
Processing
• ESRI Instruction Led Training
 Using ArcGIS for Water Utility
Workflows—August 2016
 User Workflows for ArcGIS Online
Organizations—August 2016.

PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS,

TRAINING, CERTIFICATES, LICENSES &
AFFILIATIONS:
• California Public Utilities Commission
(CPUC) Certified
• Women Business Enterprise (WBE)
AREAS OF EXPERTISE:
• Geographic Information System
Mapping Technology (GIS)
• Coordinating with Engineers and
interpreting As-Built Drawings
• Adept in cartography and map
production
• Generating figures and analysis for
CEQA/NEPA documents
• GPS equipment and applications
• Applications that support spatial and
statistical analysis
22 615

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES
D. DISCLOSURES
Casc Engineering and Consulting affirms that it does not have any past or current business or personal relationships with any current Banning elected official, appointed official, City employee, or family member of any current Banning elected official, appointed official, or City employee. 23 616

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES

STORMWATER PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CA
Casc is the City of Palm Springs’ Consultant Storm Water Program Manager, responsible for management and
implementation of the City’s storm water program. Services include providing guidance on LID implementation on new development and redevelopment projects, NPDES municipal training, private construction inspections, IC/ID investigation and reporting documentation, coordination with Desert
Task Force Meeting attendance, Trash Amendment compliance activities, MS4 annual reporting, and Report of Waste Discharge efforts related to the Whitewater River MS4 Permit renewal. Additional responsibilities include implementation of the City’s construction site program, the commercial/ industrial facilities inspection program, and municipal inspection program. Inspection services include providing construction, commercial, industrial, restaurant, and municipal inspections. With over 375 commercial/industrial facilities subject to the permit requirements, and many additional construction and municipal facilities, Casc developed a database using GIS to organize, prioritize, and track the inspection program. Casc uses ArcGIS Field Maps and Survey123 as their main source of report generation to allow inspectors to use tablets to document inspection results, collect contact information, attach photos, obtain the signature of the facility representative, and immediately email the completed inspection report to the Project Manager and site representative.

INSPECTION OF RESTAURANT, COMMERCIAL, AND INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES

CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA
Casc has been, and is currently, under contract with the City of La Quinta to perform the next round of storm water inspections for restaurant, commercial, and industrial facility. Casc performs water quality inspections of targeted facilities within the City at frequencies established by the MS4 Permit for the Whitewater River Watershed.

Casc’s responsibilities include reviewing the facility list from the Riverside County Department of Health (DEH), prioritizing facilities to be inspected, preparing inspection schedules, and providing progress reports to the City. Additionally, Casc works with Code Enforcement, identifying sites that require re-inspection by Code officers.

E1. RELEVANT PROJECT PROFILES AND CLIENT REFERENCES

INSPECTION OF RESTAURANT, COMMERCIAL, AND INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES

CATHEDRAL CITY, CA
Casc has provided Cathedral City with NPDES restaurant, commercial, and industrial facility inspections in accordance with the Whitewater River Region MS4 Permit requirements and completed inspections in compliance with Permit-required frequency. Inspectors visited identified sites and documented the status of best management practices in place to minimize pollutant discharges to the drainage system. Casc worked with the City to update and maintain the City’s current commercial/industrial database to reflect completed inspections and identify facilities for re-inspection.
24 617

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES
MS4 PERMIT INSPECTIONS AND NPDES SUPPORT SERVICES

PALM DESERT, CA
Since 2021, Casc has provided Palm Desert NPDES inspection services, including for restaurant, commercial, industrial facility and low-priority construction site inspections in accordance with the Whitewater River Region MS4 Permit requirements. Inspections are scheduled by Casc and completed in compliance with Permit-required frequency. Casc compiled a priority list for each inspection type by pulling current WDID information from the SMARTS database for both construction projects and industrial facilities, and coordinating with the City for applicable current and new business licenses. Inspectors visit the selected sites, record their observations, and recommend additional best management practices to minimize pollutant discharges to the drainage system. Casc updated and maintained the City’s current commercial/ industrial database to reflect completed inspections and identify facilities that need follow up. Casc also assisted the City by coordinating with code enforcement for Illicit Connection/Illegal Discharge investigations to verify proper escalation of enforcement efforts.

Furthermore, Casc provided support for the City to prepare for and participate in an audit of Palm Desert’s MS4 Program when inspected by the Regional Board in Spring 2023. Prior to the audit with the Regional Board, Casc joined Riverside County Watershed Staff Pre-Audit preparation meetings with the City to assist the City in navigating the audit process and understanding of their internal operations. During the audit, Casc kept the process on track by providing valuable insights on what is and is not required by the current permit, and identifying any overreaching expectations by the Regional Board. Casc’s contributions were instrumental in facilitating focus on the City’s process and how their program successfully meets the audit objectives.

NPDES PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Casc currently assists the County of Riverside’s Transportation Department with compliance activities related to the County’s three MS4 permits in the Santa Ana River, Whitewater River and Santa Margarita River watersheds. Activities include staff augmentation of an Interim NPDES Coordinator, assistance with annual report preparation, monitoring of outfalls, QSP
inspections and sampling, TPG reviews for Transportation projects, WQMP reviews for land development projects, compliance assistance with Statewide Trash Provision requirements, and MS4 permit negotiations. Additionally, Casc prepared the County’s responses to the Regional Board’s 13383 letters, coordinated with the County for completion of GIS preliminary mapping, and is currently coordinating with the County for preparation of standard designs for connector pipe screen devices. Additionally, Casc has staff who are trained in on-land visual assessments and plans to assist the County in conducting assessments for proposed alternative land use areas.

INSPECTION PRIORITIZATION, COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL INSPECTIONS

CITY OF EL MONTE, CA
Casc has provided the City of El Monte with NPDES compliance assistance in response to the last two permit renewals providing a variety of services including program development and policy reviews, field inspections, plan checking, training, GIS database development, and preparation of a Watershed Management Program and an Integrated Monitoring Program (IMP). Casc was responsible for implementing all requirements pertaining to the inspection of commercial/industrial facilities as described and mandated by the MS4 Permit. Duties included facility prioritization, database development and maintenance, research, scheduling, public information/educational material development and distribution, SWPPP review, as well as conducting over 500 commercial/industrial facility inspections. 25 618

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES
MS4 NPDES INSPECTION PROGRAM

CITY OF HEMET, CA
Casc is assisting the City of Hemet with NPDES program
implementation activities, including program management, facility evaluations, commercial-industrial inspections, and previously provided WQMP and drainage document reviews. Casc works with the City to provide assistance with MS4 Permit compliance, TMDL compliance, TMDL task force attendance, Public Education Subcommittee participation, and annual reporting documentation.

For the commercial/industrial inspections, Casc works closely with the City’s NPDES coordinator to identify commercial and industrial businesses within the City’s jurisdiction that meet inspection criteria per the Riverside County Phase I MS4 Permit Santa Ana Region, and Drainage Area Management Plan. Inspectors visit each site, documenting the status of best management practices to minimize pollutant discharges to the drainage system. To facilitate digital inspections and import them into Hemet’s Public Works’ tracking software, Casc assembled a team to develop a GIS-based interactive inspection program used by inspectors and City staff. This interactive program is compatible with the City’s database system, ensuring that all inspection information is imported and reflected in the City's software. Additionally, Casc conducts webinar training programs tailored for the City’s inspection program and provides field training for inspectors and City staff.

MS4 NPDES INSPECTION PROGRAM

CITY OF TEMECULA, CA
Casc provides industrial and commercial inspections for the City in accordance with their Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit and their storm water ordinance. Inspections include observing best management practices at facilities used for protecting storm water runoff and verifying that facilities that require coverage under the Industrial General Permit have the required WDID and SWPPP on site.

For high-priority inspections, generally industrial and selected commercial facilities, the inspector uses EnerGov software in the field to schedule and document facility inspections. These inspections are conducted on a per-facility basis. For medium and low-priority inspections, the inspector conducts drive-by reviews. Casc utilizes the City’s database applications, EnerGov and IG Inspect, a web-based mapping interface, as an organizational and scheduling tool, and to see which facilities have been inspected, need to be inspected, and require follow-up. Inspectors use the tools to schedule facility inspections, based on the priority level of the facility, for the most efficient and effective workflow.

INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL FACILITY INSPECTION PROGRAM

CITY OF IRWINDALE, CA
Casc has provided the City of Irwindale with NPDES compliance services during the current MS4 permit term.

Services have included oversight of permit programs (minimum control measures), coordination of shared Receiving Water monitoring, and performing 300 industrial/commercial facility inspections and development of the associated database. Casc also provided training to City staff related to the Industrial/Commercial Facilities Program and general MS4 permit requirements.

Using business license data provided by the City, Casc developed and prioritized a list of facilities for the Industrial/Commercial Facilities Database including a GIS map of the facility locations. Casc developed an inspection form for inspectors and then conducted inspections at approximately 300 identified industrial/ commercial facilities to verify the implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs), eliminate illicit connections and/or discharges, and verify permit coverage. 26 619

CITY OF BANNING
RFP 24-084 NPDES INSPECTIONS AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SERVICES

CLIENT CONTACT INFORMATION SERVICES
Cathedral City
John Corella, P.E.

Director of Engineering/
Public Works
(760) 770-0327
[email protected]
NPDES MS4
Inspection Program
and NPDES Support Services
(2018-Present)
City of Palm Springs
Rick Minjares
Engineering Associate
(760) 323-8523 x8741
[email protected]
NPDES Program Management
(2016-Present)
City of La Quinta
Amy Yu
Associate Engineer
(760) 777-7047
[email protected]
Industrial, Commercial, and
Restaurant Inspection Program
(2019-Present)
City of Palm Desert
Melanie Perry
Senior Management Analyst
(760)776-6424
[email protected]
NPDES MS4
Inspection Program
and NPDES Support Services
(2020-Present)
Riverside County
Transportation Department
Jan Bulinski
Senior Planner
(951) 955-6859
[email protected]
NPDES Program Management
(2007-Present)
City of Hemet
Daniel Cortese
Management Assistant/ NPDES
(951) 765-3712
[email protected]
NPDES MS4
Inspection Program
(2016-Present)
City of Temecula
Annie Bostre-Le
Public Works Stormwater Manager
(951) 308-6387
[email protected]
Industrial and Commercial
Inspection Program
(2017-Present)
E2. CLIENT REFERENCES
27 620
Casc Engineering and Consulting
November 27, 2024
RFP 24-084, NPDES INSPECTIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE Please complete the Cost Summary/Bid Sheet below with the stated estimated inspections. The actual number of inspections required for 2025 will be determinded during the year.All work will be performed per the Scope of Work (SOW) found in RFP No. 24- 084.The Tasks, Staff titles/classifications, hourly rates and costs along with the number of hours shall be included to complete. Also include ODCs, such as mileage.

If you feel a Task or subtask is necessary and not on this sheet, please add it with the staff hours and total costs for the City's consideration.

TASK NO. TASK CATEGORY/DESCRIPTION Project Manager, $175.00 Asst Project Manager, $145.00 Project Coordinator, $100.00 TOTAL HOURS

SUBTOTAL LABOR
COSTS ODCs TOTAL/ UNIT* COST

ESTIMATED

ANNUAL QUANTITY TOTAL AMOUNT
TASK 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Kick Off meeting, held virtually 1 1 2 $320.00 $320.00 N/A $320.00Project Management (invoices, general NPDES support, monthly updates, etc.) 12 32 12 56 $7,940.00 $7,940.00 N/A $7,940.00 NPDES and SB205 Inspection Master List, update, maintain (data entry) 4 20 24 $3,600.00 $3,600.00 N/A $3,600.00 SUBTOTAL TASK 1:

TASK 2 NPDES INSPECTIONS
Food Facility Inspection, including Outreach of BMP materials $194.00 25 $4,850.00Hazardous Permit (COUNTY DEH issued) Inspection, including Outreach of BMP materials $194.00 60 $11,640.00 IG Permit Inspection, including Outreach of BMP materials $257.00 12 $3,084.00QA/QC (included in Project Management) SUBTOTAL TASK 2:

TASK 3 SB205 COMPLIANCE INSPECTIONS
Inspection based on Business License SIC code, including Outreach of SB205 and BMP materials $257.00 20 $5,140.00QA/QC (included in Project Management) SUBTOTAL TASK 3:

TASK 4 FOLLOWUP/COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Followup ReInspection, Complete Inspection Form, photos $120.00 20 $2,400.00Issue written warning (Assumes 5 written warnings) 1 5 6 $900.00 $900.00 N/A $900.00Issue NOV (Assumes 1) 1 1 $175.00 $175.00 N/A $175.00QA/QC (included in Project Management) SUBTOTAL TASK 4:

RATES IN THE COST ESTIMATE SHEET AND PROPOSAL WILL BE FOR THE 2024-2025 AND 2025-2026 FISCAL YEARS TOTAL : $40,049.00 621

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Douglas Schulze, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Stephanie Sirls, Transit Manager
Art Vela, Director of Public Works
MEETING DATE: January 14, 2025
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution 2025-04, Approving Amendment No. 2 to the Design-Build Agreement with EFS West for the Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Station for an Additional Amount of $730,398 for a Second Compressor
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2025-04.

BACKGROUND:

The City owns and operates a CNG fueling facility located at the Corporate Yard (176 E. Lincoln Street).

The facility was commissioned in 2004 and serves the City’s fleet (i.e. transit buses and dump truck) and the Banning Unified School District (BUSD) bus fleet.

At the time of commissioning the CNG facility was available 24 hours a day, 7 days per week to the general public and to other agencies such as, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Caltrans, County of Riverside and Waste Management. The public access has been closed for over five years due to complications with the CNG fueling station.

The existing CNG fueling facility is several years beyond its useful life, is constantly under repair and parts have become increasingly difficult to purchase and in some cases are obsolete. As a result, the City of Banning released a Request for Proposals (RFP 23-034) for a CNG Fueling Station Design-Build project June 5, 2023. On September 12, 2023, the Council unanimously approved the project be awarded to EFS West Inc. of Valencia for being the highest ranked firm to complete the design and construct the City’s new CNG fueling facility.

The scope of work included the completion of the project design, engineering, permits, grading, construction, material, labor, testing, verification, procurement, commissioning, and installation of all equipment. To date, final design is almost 100% complete.

As part of the RFP, the City included three (3) additive bid alternate items. EFS West, Inc. bid on the three items as follows:

Additive Bid Alternate Price
Second CNG Compressor $895,000
Standby Diesel Generator $260,549
Second Fuel Island $278,361
622
City staff has successfully secured additional funding from the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) through the FY 2024/2025 SRTP process for the purchase of the second CNG compressor and the standby diesel generator. City Council adopted Resolution 2024-188 approving Amendment No. 1 for the purchase of a standby diesel generator December 10th, 2024. As discussed in that same staff report, staff is now asking City Council to approve Amendment No. 2 for the purchase and installation of the second compressor as ongoing negotiations amongst staff and EFS West resulted in revised, and more competitive, pricing being provided. As the result, EFS West’s quote for the second compressor was reduced from the original amount of $895,000 to $730,398.

JUSTIFICATION:

The addition of a second compressor increases the station’s fueling capacity while providing increased efficiency and resiliency. As outlined in the September 12, 2023, staff report (Resolution No. 2023-155), staff requested and were subsequently granted additional STA funding for a second compressor based on this need for resiliency and increased efficiencies.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The current adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 includes a budgeted amount of $900,000 for the second compressor in Account No. 610-5800-331.90-56. The project is fully funded by State Transit Assistance (STA) funds as programmed in the City’s approved Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP).

ALTERNATIVES:

Do not adopt the resolution and provide alternative direction to staff.

BUDGETED?:

Yes
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT:

Yes
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 2025-04, EFS West CNG Station.docx

2. Exhibit A - Amend No.2 to the DBA with EFS West.docx

3. EFS 2nd Compressor Proposal.pdf

4. 9.12.23 Staff Report Awarding CNG Station to EFS.pdf

5. 12.10.24 Staff Report Approving EFS Amendment 1.pdf
623
Resolution 2025-04