Banning City Council
February 25, 2025

Other Funding Sources
The City is also considering, as possible funding sources, the Water Infrastructure Finance Innovation Act (WIFIA) and Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF).

1379
Page | 52

10. RESEARCH NEEDS
The proposed water reclamation Project includes basic research needs and will solely use proven technologies and conventional system components. Further research to implement the proposed water reclamation project will not be necessary.

1380
Page | 53

11. REFERENCES
Carollo Engineers, Inc. 2006 Recycled Water Master Plan. 2006.

Carollo Engineers, Inc. 2018 Integrated Master Plan. March 2018.

West Yost & Associates Engineering, Inc. and John Robinson Consulting, Inc. 2020 Urban Water Management. June 2021.
1381
______________________________________________________________________________ Appendix A
RO Analysis Technical Memo

1382
City of Banning
WWTP Upgrade OA Service
Draft Reverse Osmosis Analysis
Technical Memo
November 22, 2023
N2W Engineering, Inc. T 714.716.1711
3240 El Camino Real, Suite 150 [email protected]
Irvine, CA 92602 www.n2weng.com
1383
Prepared by: Iris Jimenez and Jamal Awad
Reviewed by: James Wang

1384

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There are two potential sources of recycled water for the City of Banning, the Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) and a non-potable well (NP-1), however neither currently meets the Beaumont Basin Plan requirements for TDS and TN. In order to lower the TDS and TN at either source, a reverse osmosis (RO) treatment will need to be implemented. To recover around 1 MGD of available reuse water and obtain TDS and TN concentrations lower than the Beaumont Basin Plan requirements, the WWTP would require a 0.5 MGD RO system and the nonpotable well would require a 0.8 MGD RO system.

The recommended approach is to treat NP-1 with RO now, since construction of the WWTP upgrades is not expected to finish for another 3 years. Once the WWTP is upgraded to tertiary standards, the RO system can be converted to treat the WWTP effluent, or a second RO system can be built and the RO-treated NP-1 and WWTP effluent can blend to serve recycled water customers.

1385

1. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
The City’s existing non-potable water system delivers recycled water from Well M7 to the Sun Lakes Country Club. The City has served an average of 0.76 MGD from Well M7 to the Sun Lakes Country Club in the years 2012 through 2014. However, the City eventually plans to convert Well M7 and Well M12 (another operational non-potable well) over to the potable water system by the end of year 2025 and year 2040, respectively, to supplement the potable water supply.

According to the 2018 San Gorgonio Integrated Master Plan, the existing potential recycled water demand for the City of Banning is around 1.49 MGD: 0.76 MGD average day demand (ADD) from Sun Lakes Country Club, 0.20 MGD ADD from Five Bridges Development, 0.03 MGD ADD from Neighborhood Park, 0.08 MGD ADD from Dysart Park, 0.19 MGD ADD from Rancho San Gorgonio,

0.16 MGD ADD from Banning High School, and 0.07 MGD ADD from Lions Park. Based on recent discussions with the City, the aim will be to serve Sun Lakes Country Club first, and Banning High School, Dysart Park, Lions Park, Rancho San Gorgonio, Neighborhood Park and Five Bridges Development in the near-future.

In order to meet these recycled water demands, the City has plans to upgrade the existing wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) to meet tertiary standards. The City has already begun constructing an additional 3.4 miles of pipeline to connect the existing recycled water pipes to the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) and to NP-1 located adjacent to the WWTP.

In addition to these standards, in order to serve Sun Lakes Country Club, which is located over the Beaumont Basin, the WWTP effluent must also meet the Beaumont Basin maximum benefit objectives of 330 mg/L for TDS and 5 mg/L for TN. With a current average TDS of 390 mg/L and an expected TN of 7.74 mg/L, once secondary treatment at the plant is upgraded to MBR, the WWTP effluent does not meet either of these objectives.

Near the WWTP is a non-potable well, NP-1, that may be able to supply water to these irrigation customers in place of the WWTP until the plant is upgraded to tertiary standards. The capacity of the well is 800 gal/min, or 1.15 MGD, and is expected to be fully operational within the next few months. Like the WWTP, the water quality of the well does not meet the Beaumont Basin maximum benefit objectives. Based on an analytical report from August of 2023, the average TDS and TN of NP-1 is 430 mg/L and 17 mg/L, respectively.

The purpose of this technical memo is to determine the best strategy for supplying recycled water to the City of Banning.

1386

2. TDS AND TN MASS BALANCES
In order to reduce TDS and TN levels at either the WWTP or NP-1, the most effective treatment method is reverse osmosis (RO). This section describes the RO treatment systems and final effluent quality at each location. In order to meet the current recycled water demand for Sun Lakes Country Club, the assumed output goal for available reuse water for both the WWTP and NP-1 is around 1 MGD.

Various recovery rates were analyzed for the proposed RO treatment system, including 75%, 80%, and 93%. Based on expected costs of brine treatment for each of the recovery rates, it was determined that maximizing RO recovery is the most cost beneficial. At this time, 93% recovery for a two-stage RO system is feasible based on the source water quality, and therefore TDS and TN mass balances in the following section assume a 93% recovery rate.

For both options, the proposed RO systems were sized to treat the final combined effluent to just below the Beaumont Basin Plan requirement (i.e., Beaumont Basin maximum benefit objective) for TN. For lower final combined effluent TN concentrations, additional RO treatment capacity can be added to the systems.

1387

2.1 Option 1
This first option involves treating a percentage of the WWTP effluent with RO for recycled water irrigation use. Since the WWTP must meet tertiary standards in order to be recycled, an MBR, chlorination tank, and RO system would all need to be implemented for this alternative.

Therefore, this process involves sending 1 MGD of the approximately 3.6 MGD WWTP influent through the MBR from the primary clarifiers, then to the chlorination tank; the remaining 2.6 MGD will continue discharging to the percolation ponds.

After disinfection, 0.5 MGD of this 1 MGD flow will be sent to the two-stage RO system and the remaining 0.5 MGD will blend with the RO permeate. Assuming 93% recovery, around 0.035 MGD of the RO treated 0.5 MGD will be converted into brine. This brine will be sent to mechanical evaporators and salt evaporation ponds that will be located near the RO facility. These salt evaporation ponds will require around 8 acres of surface area and will be designed to meet the Title 27 requirements described in Section 2.4. The 0.47 MGD RO permeate will combine with the 0.5 MGD WWTP effluent for a total of 0.97 MGD available for reuse.

The TDS and TN of the 0.97 MGD reuse water will be about 207 mg/L and 4.4 mg/L, respectively, meeting the Beaumont Basin Plan requirements of 330 mg/L for TDS and 5 mg/L for TN. The water quality of the remaining WWTP effluent that will discharge to the percolation ponds will remain unchanged, with a TDS of 390 mg/L TDS and TN of 7.5 mg/L. These concentrations are both below the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region’s (RWQCB) Board Order R7-2016-0015 (Board Order) percolation limits of 440-490 mg/L for TDS and 10 mg/L for TN. See Figure 1 for the detailed mass balance of this option, including the evaluated available reuse water for 93%, 80% and 75% RO recovery. 1388
Figure 1. WWTP TDS Mass Balance

2.2 Option 2
The second alternative involves treating NP-1 with RO for recycled water irrigation use. For this option, 1 MGD will be pumped from NP-1. Of this 1 MGD, 0.8 MGD will flow to the two-stage RO system, and 0.2 MGD will blend with the RO permeate. Assuming 93% recovery, there will be approximately 0.056 MGD of RO brine, which will be sent to mechanical evaporators and salt evaporation ponds located near the RO facility. These salt evaporation ponds will require around 15 acres of surface area and will be designed to meet the Title 27 requirements described in Section 2.4. The 0.74 MGD RO permeate will blend with the 0.2 MGD non-treated water from the well for a total of 0.94 MGD available for reuse.

The final TDS and TN of the 0.94 MGD recycled water will be about 99 mg/L and 4.0 mg/L, respectively, below the Beaumont Basin Plan requirements. The water quality of the WWTP effluent that discharges to the percolation ponds will remain unchanged, with a TDS of 390 mg/L TDS and TN of 7.5 mg/L, both below the RWQCB Board Order percolation limits. See Figure 2 for the detailed mass balance of this option, including the evaluated available reuse water for 93%, 80%, and 75% RO recovery.
1389
Figure 2. NP-1 TDS Mass Balance

2.3 RO Facility Siting
Among the potential recycled water demands, the Sun Lakes Country Club with a demand of 0.76 MGD is the only one located over the Beaumont Basin. As such, an RO facility can be sized for the demand by the Sun Lakes Country Club and be located near the service connection. Brine from the RO facility would be discharged back into the sewer and treated at the WWTP.

The capital costs for this option would be smaller than siting the RO facility near the WWTP and NP-1 well. However, locating the RO facility at the service connection has significant drawbacks including:

1. The remote O&M will result in higher operations costs.

2. The brine flow will be discharged to the sewer and treated again at the WWTP. If treatment Option 1 is pursued, the return brine will result in gradual increase in the WWTP TDS level.

3. If lower TDS levels become important for the other potential users, it would be much harder to implement in the future.

4. Having the location by the WWTP allows for future brine management such as evaporation ponds.

Because of these drawbacks, it is recommended that the RO facility be located near the WWTP. 1390

2.4 Title 27 Requirements
The discharge of the RO to the brine evaporation ponds is subject to regulation under the California Code of Regulations, Title 27 Environmental Protection (27 CCR), Division 2 Solid Waste. This liquid-designated waste must be contained in a Class II surface impoundment constructed with a double liner and a leachate collection and removal system (LCRS) per CCR, Title 27. As part of the CCR, Title 27 requirements, the Discharger is also required to monitor the surface impoundments, including the vadose zone and groundwater beneath the site.

In order to comply with this regulation, the design of the evaporation ponds will include several layers of protection and monitoring capabilities. The uppermost layer will consist of a 60-mil textured HDPE primary liner, which will prevent leachate from migrating below the ponds. A second 60-mil HDPE drain liner will make up the bottom of the LCRS. The bottom liner is defined as the free-draining vadose zone monitoring system (VZMS).

This LCRS system will be designed to detect any leaks and collect any moisture that may develop in the LCRS. The bottom liner will capture any liquid that leaks through the upper primary liner, with the liquid being collected in a sump area for collection and removal. The sump will be continuously monitored using a level switch that will be installed in the monitoring tube of the LCRS sump.
1391

3. COST ESTIMATE

3.1 Option 1
The order of magnitude costs for Option 1 are detailed below. The capital costs required for the WWTP effluent to meet tertiary standards include MBR, disinfection, an RO system, as well as brine evaporation ponds and mechanical evaporators.

WWTP
MBR – 3.6 MGD $52,887,000
Chlorination Tank – 3.6 MGD $2,377,700
RO System – 0.5 MGD $1,619,000
Brine Evaporation Ponds and Mechanical
Evaporators
$5,256,100
TOTAL $62,139,800

3.2 Option 2
The order of magnitude cost for Option 2 is detailed below. The capital costs required for NP-1 to meet non-potable standards are an RO system as well as brine evaporations ponds and mechanical evaporators.

NP-1
RO System – 0.8 MGD $3,497,500
Brine Evaporation Ponds and
Mechanical Evaporators
$2,948,000
TOTAL $6,445,500

1392

4. RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended to implement Option 2 now and Option 1 once the upgrade of the WWTP is complete. The time of construction to upgrade the WWTP, including building the new MBR and chlorination tank, is estimated to take approximately 3 years. Therefore, in order to serve the current recycled water demands from Sun Lakes Country Club within these 3 years, a 1 MGD RO system for NP-1 can be built now. Once the construction for the upgrades of the WWTP is finished, depending on the recycled water demand at this time, either the RO system used for NP-1 can be converted for WWTP effluent use or a second 1 MGD RO system can be built for the WWTP effluent. If a second RO system is installed, the NP-1 and WWTP effluent, post ROtreatment, will blend to satisfy the recycled water demands, thereby keeping NP-1 in commission.
1393
______________________________________________________________________________ Appendix B
Rancho San Gorgonio Water Supply Assessment
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
1430
1431
1432
1433
1434
1435
1436
1437
1438
1439
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
1449
1450
1451
1452
1453
1454
1455
1456
1457
1458
1459
1460
1461
1462
1463
1464
1465
1466
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472
1473
1474
1475
1476
1477
1478
1479
1480
1481
1482
1483
1484
______________________________________________________________________________ Appendix C
50-Year Lifecycle Cost

1485
Inflation 3.75%
Discount rate (Nominal) 5%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 Item 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057 2058 2059 2060 2061 2062 2063 2064 2065 2066 2067 2068 2069 2070 2071 2072 2073 2074 2075 2076 2077 Capital 93,487,328$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Annual Costs (Labor, Electrical,
Chemical, Repairs) 3,890,000$ 4,035,875$ 4,187,220$ 4,344,241$ 4,507,150$ 4,676,168$ 4,851,525$ 5,033,457$ 5,222,211$ 5,418,044$ 5,621,221$ 5,832,017$ 6,050,717$ 6,277,619$ 6,513,030$ 6,757,269$ 7,010,666$ 7,273,566$ 7,546,325$ 7,829,312$ 8,122,911$ 8,427,520$ 8,743,552$ 9,071,436$ 9,411,615$ 9,764,550$ 10,130,721$ 10,510,623$ 10,904,771$ 11,313,700$ 11,737,964$ 12,178,137$ 12,634,818$ 13,108,623$ 13,600,197$ 14,110,204$ 14,639,337$ 15,188,312$ 15,757,873$ 16,348,794$ 16,961,873$ 17,597,944$ 18,257,867$ 18,942,537$ 19,652,882$ 20,389,865$ 21,154,485$ 21,947,778$ 22,770,819$ 23,624,725$ 24,510,652$ Civil/Structural, Mechanical,
Electrical/Controls Replacements -$ 868,659$ 901,234$ 935,030$ 970,093$ 1,006,472$ 1,044,215$ 1,083,373$ 1,123,999$ 1,166,149$ 1,209,880$ 1,255,250$ 1,302,322$ 1,351,159$ 1,401,828$ 1,454,396$ 1,508,936$ 1,565,521$ 1,624,228$ 1,685,137$ 1,748,329$ 1,813,892$ 1,881,913$ 1,952,484$ 2,025,702$ 2,101,666$ 2,180,479$ 2,262,247$ 2,347,081$ 2,435,097$ 2,526,413$ 2,621,153$ 2,719,446$ 2,821,426$ 2,927,229$ 3,037,000$ 3,150,888$ 3,269,046$ 3,391,635$ 3,518,822$ 3,650,777$ 3,787,681$ 3,929,720$ 4,077,084$ 4,229,975$ 4,388,599$ 4,553,171$ 4,723,915$ 4,901,062$ 5,084,852$ 5,275,534$ RO Membrane Replacement and
MBR Membrane Replacements -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,807,819$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,583,568$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,573,642$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,837,255$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,449,981$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,508,273$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12,135,234$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 15,487,975$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 19,767,017$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,228,280$ Total $ 97,377,328 $ 4,904,534 $ 5,088,454 $ 5,279,271 $ 5,477,244 $ 8,490,460 $ 5,895,739 $ 6,116,829 $ 6,346,210 $ 6,584,193 $ 10,414,669 $ 7,087,267 $ 7,353,039 $ 7,628,778 $ 7,914,858 $ 12,785,307 $ 8,519,602 $ 8,839,087 $ 9,170,553 $ 9,514,449 $ 15,708,496 $ 10,241,412 $ 10,625,465 $ 11,023,920 $ 11,437,317 $ 19,316,197 $ 12,311,199 $ 12,772,869 $ 13,251,852 $ 13,748,797 $ 23,772,650 $ 14,799,290 $ 15,354,264 $ 15,930,049 $ 16,527,426 $ 29,282,438 $ 17,790,224 $ 18,457,358 $ 19,149,509 $ 19,867,615 $ 36,100,626 $ 21,385,625 $ 22,187,586 $ 23,019,621 $ 23,882,856 $ 44,545,481 $ 25,707,656 $ 26,671,693 $ 27,671,881 $ 28,709,577 $ 55,014,466 50-Year Future Cost $ 486,892,000
50-Year Present Cost $ 224,149,159
Alternative 3 Phase I
1486
______________________________________________________________________________ Appendix D
Preliminary Detailed Site Plan and Process Flow Diagram

1487
N2W ENGINEERING, INC.
3240 El Camino Real. Suite 150
Irvine, CA 92602
WWW.N2WENG.COM
SHEET:

CLIENT:

PROJECT:

PROJECT NO.

STATUS:

FILE: C:\USERS\JAMES WANG\N2W ENGINEERING\N2W - SERVER\PROJECTS\105-CITY OF BANNING\105-0002 OWNER ADVISOR W&WWTP\6. PROJECT ENGINEERING AND DESIGN\06.01_PRELIMINARY DESIGN\DESIGN DRAWING\MBR SITE PLAN JAMES WANG 11 06 2023.DWG REV. DESCRIPTION DATE
PLOT DATE:
11/6/2023 5:26 PM
DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: APPROVED BY:

TITLE:

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE
ANSI-D105-0002

PRELIMINARY
BANNING, CA 92220
789 N. SAN GORGONIO AVENUE

CITY OF BANNING
BANNING, CA 92220
2242 CHARLES STREET

BANNING WWTP

CIVIL SITE PLAN
C-101
1488
1489
______________________________________________________________________________ Appendix E
Preliminary Capital Cost Estimate

1490
Project: City of Banning MBR
Client: City of Banning MBR
Location: City of Banning
NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST UNIT LABOR UNIT LABOR COST MATERIAL TOTAL Division 01 - General Requirements
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 02 - Site Work
Site Clearing and General Demolition (Inlcuded in MBR cost) 1 LS -$ $0 $0 Excavation for 8" PVC RO Pipelines 556 CY 20$ $11,111 $11,111Backfill/Compaction for 8" PVC RO Pipelines 536 CY 20$ $10,723 $10,723Material Disposal for 8" PVC RO Pipelines 19 CY 10$ $194 $194 Total $22,100 $22,028
Division 03 - Concrete
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 04 - CMU
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 05 - Metals
Pipe Support 1 LS 15,000$ $15,000 $15,000
Total $15,000 $15,000
Division 07 - Thermal and Moisture Protection
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 08 - Doors and Windows
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 09 - Finishes
Painting and Coating 1 LS 15,000$ $15,000 $15,000
Total $15,000 $15,000
Division 10 - Specialties
Identification Device 1 LS 5,000$ $5,000 $5,000
Signage 1 LS 5,000$ $5,000 $5,000
Total $10,000 $10,000
Division 11 - Equipment
RO System (0.8 MGD, Includes Chemical Dosing System) 1 LS 1,035,000$ $1,035,000 207,000$ $1,242,000 RO Effluent Pumps (700 gpm @ 30 ft 10 HP) 2 EA 30,000$ $60,000 12,000$ $72,000 CIP Skid for 8" Membrane 1 EA 38,611$ $38,611 7,722$ $46,333 Total $1,133,700 $1,360,333
Division 13 - Speciality
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 15 - Mechanical
NP-1 Effluent to RO (8" PVC) 750 LF 100$ $75,000 15,000$ $90,000RO Effluent to NPR Pipeline (8" PVC) 750 LF 100$ $75,000 15,000$ $90,000Suction/Discharge Plug Valve (8") 4 EA 700$ $2,800 560$ $3,360 Discharge Swing Check Valve (8") 2 EA 1,600$ $3,200 640$ $3,840 8" 45/ 90 Degree Elbows 8 EA 400$ $3,200 640$ $4,000
Misc Piping 1 LS 10,000$ $10,000 2,000$ $12,000
Total $169,200 $203,200
Division 16 - Electrical
Electrical (Control Panel, Service Metering, Conduit,Wiring, Lighting, Grounding, VFD, Soft Starter, etc) 1 LS $ 340,110 $340,110 $ - $340,110 Total $340,200 $340,110
Division 17 - Instrumentation
Plant SCADA and Instrumentation (PLC, Master Control Panel, SCADA, Programming, etc) 1 LS $ 136,044 $136,044 $ - $136,044 Total $136,100 $136,044
Construction Total $2,101,716
Contingency and Construction Level of Difficulties 25% $525,429 Subtotal 1 $2,627,144
Mobilization and Insurance (Percentage of Subtotal 1) 5% $131,357 Subtotal 2 $2,758,502
General Conditions (Percentage of Subtotal 2) 5% $137,925 Subtotal 3 $2,896,427
Contractor Profit (Percentage of Subtotal 3) 15% $434,464 Subtotal 4 $3,330,891
Escalation to Mid-Point of Construction Assume 2022 (Percentage of Subtotal 4) 5% $166,545 Subtotal 5 $3,497,500
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST OPINION - RO System (Phase I)

MATERIAL

SUBTOTAL
LABOR

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION TOTAL
1491
Project: City of Banning MBR
Client: City of Banning MBR
Location: City of Banning
NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST UNIT LABOR UNIT LABOR COST MATERIAL TOTAL Division 01 - General Requirements
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 02 - Site Work
Demolition 1 LS 15,000$ $15,000 $15,000
Site excavation 121000.00 CY 10$ 1,210,000$ $1,210,000
Total $1,225,000 $1,225,000
Division 03 - Concrete
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 04 - CMU
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 05 - Metals
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 07 - Thermal and Moisture Protection
60 mil HDPE - Double Lined Pond 653400 SQ FT 3$ $1,633,500 $1,633,500 Total $1,633,500 $1,633,500
Division 08 - Doors and Windows
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 09 - Finishes
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 10 - Specialties
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 11 - Equipment
Evaporator 10 EA 30,000$ $300,000 $300,000
Total $300,000 $300,000
Division 13 - Speciality
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 15 - Mechanical
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 16 - Electrical
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 17 - Instrumentation
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Construction Total $3,158,500
Contingency and Construction Level of Difficulties 25% $789,625 Subtotal 1 $3,948,125
Mobilization and Insurance (Percentage of Subtotal 1) 5% $197,406 Subtotal 2 $4,145,531
General Conditions (Percentage of Subtotal 2) 5% $207,277 Subtotal 3 $4,352,808
Contractor Profit (Percentage of Subtotal 3) 15% $652,921 Subtotal 4 $5,005,729
Escalation to Mid-Point of Construction Assume 2022 (Percentage of Subtotal 4) 5% $250,286 Subtotal 5 $5,256,100
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST OPINION - Brine Drying Beds and Evaporators (Phase I)

MATERIAL

SUBTOTAL
LABOR

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION TOTAL
1492
Project: City of Banning MBR
Client: City of Banning MBR
Location: City of Banning
NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST UNIT
LABOR

UNIT LABOR
COST

MATERIAL
TOTAL
Division 01 - General Requirements
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 02 - Site Work
Site Cleaning 1 LS 50,000$ $50,000 $50,000
Yard Piping 1 LS 500,000$ $500,000 $500,000
Excavation 33,217 CY 20$ $664,344 $664,344
Backfill 18,906 CY 20$ $378,121 $378,121
Soil Disposal Onsite 19791.111 CY 10$ $197,911 $197,911 Paving 1 LS 200,000$ $200,000 $200,000
Grading 1.00 LS 400,000$ $400,000 $400,000
Total $2,390,400 $2,391,000
Division 03 - Concrete
Concrete 3,389 CY 1,250$ $4,236,852 $4,236,852
$4,236,900 $4,237,000
Division 04 - CMU
Building (Blower, MCC, Lab, Storage, Chemical, Pump, RO) 7200 SF 500$ $3,600,000 $3,600,000 Canopy for MBR 2800 SF 120$ $336,000 $336,000
$3,936,000 $3,936,000
Division 05 - Metals
Pipe Support 1 LS 250,000$ $250,000 $250,000
$250,000 $250,000
Division 07 - Thermal and Moisture Protection
Not Used $0
$0 $0
Division 08 - Doors and Windows
Not Used $0
$0 $0
Division 09 - Finishes
Painting and Coating (Concrete, Equipment, Piping) 1 LS 250,000$ $250,000 $250,000 Total $250,000 $250,000
Division 10 - Specialties
Identification Device and Signage Not Used 1 LS 50,000$ $50,000 $50,000 Total $50,000 $50,000
Division 11 - Equipment
Influent Fine Screen 3 EA 345,000$ $1,035,000 207,000$ $1,242,000 MBR 1 EA 9,660,000$ $9,660,000 2,415,000$ $12,075,000
Aeration Blower 4 EA 276,000$ $1,104,000 220,800$ $1,324,800 Aeration Diffuser 2000 EA 276$ $552,000 110,400$ $662,400 Sludge Thickener 2 EA 150,000$ $300,000 60,000$ $360,000 Total $12,651,000 $15,665,000
Division 14 - Conveying Systems
Bridge Crane 1 LS 100,000$ $100,000 $100,000
Total $100,000 $100,000
Division 15 - Mechanical
Piping, Fitting, Valving 1 LS 2,000,000$ $2,000,000 1,000,000$ $3,000,000 Total $2,000,000 $3,000,000
Division 16 - Electrical
Control Panel for Pump and Blower, Conduit, Wiring and Misc Electrical 1 LS $4,500,000 $4,500,000 $1,125,000 $5,625,000 Total $4,500,000 $5,625,000
Division 17 - Instrumentation
System Control / SCADA 1 LS 1,250,000$ $1,250,000 312,500$ $1,562,500 Total $1,250,000 $1,563,000
Construction Total $24,416,000
Contingency and Construction Level of Difficulties 25% $6,104,000 Subtotal 1 $30,520,000
Mobilization and Insurance (Percentage of Subtotal 1) 5% $1,526,000 Subtotal 2 $32,046,000
General Conditions (Percentage of Subtotal 2) 6% $1,922,760 Subtotal 3 $33,968,760
Contractor Profit (Percentage of Subtotal 3) 15% $5,095,314 Subtotal 4 $39,064,074
Escalation to Mid-Point of Construction Assume 2022 (Percentage of Subtotal 4) 3% $1,171,922 Subtotal 5 $40,236,000
Total

TOTAL COST
(with Packaged
MBR) $52,887,000
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST OPINION - MBR Facility (Phase I)

MATERIAL

SUBTOTAL
LABOR

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION TOTAL
1493
Project: City of Banning MBR
Client: City of Banning MBR
Location: City of Banning
NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST UNIT LABOR UNIT LABOR COST MATERIAL TOTAL Division 01 - General Requirements
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 02 - Site Work
Site Clearing 1 LS 10,000$ 10,000$ $10,000
Site General Demolition (Building and Pavement) 1 LS 10,000$ 10,000$ $10,000Site Material Disposal 891.44 CY 10$ 8,914$ $8,914 Site Excavation 1565.68 CY 20$ 31,314$ $31,314
Site Backfill 674.24 CY 20$ 13,485$ $13,485
Shoring 2915.40 SF 50$ 145,770$ $145,770
PI Primary Influent Site Material Disposal 0.05 CY 10$ $1 $1 PI Primary Influent Site Excavation 62.52 CY 20$ $1,250 $1,250 PI Primary Influent Backfill 62.47 CY 20$ $1,249 $1,249 PE Primary Effluent Site Material Disposal 0.05 CY 10$ $1 $1 PE Primary Effluent Site Excavation 57.19 CY 20$ $1,144 $1,144 PE Primary Effluent Backfill 57.13 CY 20$ $1,143 $1,143 Total $224,300 $224,300
Division 03 - Concrete
Concrete Pad 169.65 CY 1,250$ 212,058$ $212,058Primary Clarifier 81.60 CY 1,250$ 102,006$ $102,006 Total $314,100 $314,100
Division 04 - CMU
Platform $0
Total $0 $0
Division 05 - Metals
Pipe Supports, Handrail 1 LS 40,000$ 40,000$ $40,000
Total $40,000 $40,000
Division 07 - Thermal and Moisture Protection
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 08 - Doors and Windows
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 09 - Finishes
Painting and Coating 1 LS 20,000$ 20,000$ $20,000
Total $20,000 $20,000
Division 10 - Specialties
Signage 1 LS 10,000$ 10,000$ $10,000
Total $10,000 $10,000
Division 11 - Equipment
Center Drive, Scraper, Platform 1 LS 250,000$ 250,000$ 50,000$ $375,000 Total $250,000 $375,000
Division 13 - Speciality
Not Used 0 LS $0
Total $0 $0
Division 15 - Mechanical
PI Primary Influent (12" steel) 70.33 LF 200$ $14,067 2,813$ $16,880 PE Primary Effluent (12" steel) 64.33 LF 200$ $12,867 2,573$ $15,440 Misc Piping 1 LS 30,000$ 30,000$ 6,000$ $37,500
Total $56,940 $69,820
Division 16 - Electrical
Electrical (Control Panel, Service Metering, Conduit,Wiring, Lighting, Grounding, VFD, Soft Starter, etc) 1 LS $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $75,000 Total $75,000 $75,000
Division 17 - Instrumentation
Plant SCADA and Instrumentation (PLC, Master Control Panel, SCADA, Programming, etc) 1 LS $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ - $20,000 Total $20,000 $40,000
Construction Total $1,168,220
Contingency and Construction Level of Difficulties 25% $292,055 Subtotal 1 $1,460,275
Mobilization and Insurance (Percentage of Subtotal 1) 5% $73,014 Subtotal 2 $1,533,289
General Conditions (Percentage of Subtotal 2) 5% $76,664 Subtotal 3 $1,609,953
Contractor Profit (Percentage of Subtotal 3) 15% $241,493 Subtotal 4 $1,851,446
Escalation to Mid-Point of Construction Assume 2022 (Percentage of Subtotal 4) 5% $92,572 Subtotal 5 $1,944,100
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST OPINION - Primary Clarifier (Phase I)

MATERIAL

SUBTOTAL
LABOR

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION TOTAL
1494
Project: City of Banning MBR
Client: City of Banning MBR
Location: City of Banning
NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST UNIT LABOR UNIT LABOR COST MATERIAL TOTAL Division 01 - General Requirements
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 02 - Site Work
Site Clearing 1 LS 10,000$ 10,000$ $10,000Site Material Disposal 2816.00 CY 10$ 28,160$ $28,160Site Excavation 6332.50 CY 20$ 126,650$ $126,650Site Backfill 3516.50 CY 20$ 70,330$ $70,330FE Chlorination Pipe Site Material Disposal 0.05 CY 10$ $1 $1FE Chlorination Pipe Site Excavation 66.67 CY 20$ $1,333 $1,333FE Chlorination Pipe Backfill 66.61 CY 20$ $1,332 $1,332 Total $237,900 $237,900
Division 03 - Concrete
Concrete Tank 690.24 CY 1,300$ 897,313$ $897,313
Total $897,400 $897,400
Division 04 - CMU
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 05 - Metals
Pipe Support 1 LS 20,000$ 20,000$ $20,000
Total $20,000 $20,000
Division 07 - Thermal and Moisture Protection
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 08 - Doors and Windows
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 09 - Finishes
Painting and Coating 1 LS 10,000$ 10,000$ $10,000
Total $10,000 $10,000
Division 10 - Specialties
Signage 1 LS 10,000$ 10,000$ $10,000
Total $10,000 $10,000
Division 11 - Equipment
Tank - Schneider - 1500 gallon (IInstallation - 25%) 2 EA 20,000$ 40,000$ 10,000$ $62,500Chemical Injection Package 2 EA 15,000$ 30,000$ 6,000$ $45,000 Total $70,000 $107,500
Division 13 - Speciality
Not Used 0 LS $0
Total $0 $0
Division 15 - Mechanical
MBR Effluent to Chlorination (16" steel) 75 LF 400$ 30,000.00$ 6,000$ $36,000Misc Piping 1 LS 20,000$ 20,000$ 4,000$ $25,000 Total $50,000 $61,000
Division 16 - Electrical
Electrical (Control Panel, Service Metering, Conduit,Wiring, Lighting, Grounding, VFD, Soft Starter, etc) 1 LS $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ - $25,000 Total $25,000 $25,000
Division 17 - Instrumentation
Plant SCADA and Instrumentation (PLC, Master Control Panel, SCADA, Programming, etc) 1 LS $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ - $30,000 Total $30,000 $60,000
Construction Total $1,428,800
Contingency and Construction Level of Difficulties 25% $357,200 Subtotal 1 $1,786,000
Mobilization and Insurance (Percentage of Subtotal 1) 5% $89,300 Subtotal 2 $1,875,300
General Conditions (Percentage of Subtotal 2) 5% $93,765 Subtotal 3 $1,969,065
Contractor Profit (Percentage of Subtotal 3) 15% $295,360 Subtotal 4 $2,264,425
Escalation to Mid-Point of Construction Assume 2022 (Percentage of Subtotal 4) 5% $113,221 Subtotal 5 $2,377,700
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST OPINION - Chlorine Tank (Phase I)

MATERIAL

SUBTOTAL
LABOR

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION TOTAL
1495
Project: City of Banning MBR
Client: City of Banning MBR
Location: City of Banning
NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST UNIT LABOR UNIT LABOR COST MATERIAL TOTAL Division 01 - General Requirements
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 02 - Site Work
Site Material Disposal 22.52 CY 80$ 1,801$ $1,801
Site Excavation 33.78 CY 30$ 1,013$ $1,013
Site Backfill 11.26 CY 50$ 563$ $563
Total $3,400 $3,378
Division 03 - Concrete
Concrete Pad and Walls 19.64 CY 1,500$ 29,460$ $29,460
Total $29,500 $29,500
Division 04 - CMU
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 05 - Metals
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 07 - Thermal and Moisture Protection
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 08 - Doors and Windows
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 09 - Finishes
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 10 - Specialties
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 11 - Equipment
Ferric Sulfate Tank 1 EA 6,250$ 6,250$ 1,250$ $9,375Chemical Injection Package 1 EA 31,250$ 31,250$ 6,250$ $46,875 Total $37,500 $56,250
Division 13 - Speciality
Not Used 0 LS $0
Total $0 $0
Division 15 - Mechanical
Misc Piping 1 LS 12,000$ 12,000$ 2,400$ $15,000
Total $12,000 $15,000
Division 16 - Electrical
Electrical/Controls 1 LS $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $75,000
Total $75,000 $75,000
Division 17 - Instrumentation
Not Used 0 LS $0
Total $0 $0
Construction Total $179,128
Contingency and Construction Level of Difficulties 25% $44,782 Subtotal 1 $223,910
Mobilization and Insurance (Percentage of Subtotal 1) 5% $11,195 Subtotal 2 $235,105
General Conditions (Percentage of Subtotal 2) 5% $11,755 Subtotal 3 $246,860
Contractor Profit (Percentage of Subtotal 3) 15% $37,029 Subtotal 4 $283,890
Escalation to Mid-Point of Construction Assume 2022 (Percentage of Subtotal 4) 5% $14,194 Subtotal 5 $298,100
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST OPINION - Upgrade Ferric Sulfate Feed/Storage System (Phase I)

MATERIAL

SUBTOTAL
LABOR

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION TOTAL
1496
Project: City of Banning MBR
Client: City of Banning MBR
Location: City of Banning
NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST UNIT LABOR UNIT LABOR COST MATERIAL TOTAL Division 01 - General Requirements
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 02 - Site Work
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 03 - Concrete
Concrete Rehabilitation 1 LS 100,000$ 100,000$ $100,000 Total $100,000 $100,000
Division 04 - CMU
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 05 - Metals
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 07 - Thermal and Moisture Protection
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 08 - Doors and Windows
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 09 - Finishes
Internal Coating 2,308 LS 60$ 138,474$ $138,474
Total $138,500 $138,474
Division 10 - Specialties
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 11 - Equipment
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 13 - Speciality
Confined Space Entry 1 LS 40,000$ 40,000$ $40,000
Total $40,000 $40,000
Division 15 - Mechanical
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 16 - Electrical
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 17 - Instrumentation
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Construction Total $278,474
Contingency and Construction Level of Difficulties 25% $69,619 Subtotal 1 $348,093
Mobilization and Insurance (Percentage of Subtotal 1) 5% $17,405 Subtotal 2 $365,497
General Conditions (Percentage of Subtotal 2) 5% $18,275 Subtotal 3 $383,772
Contractor Profit (Percentage of Subtotal 3) 15% $57,566 Subtotal 4 $441,338
Escalation to Mid-Point of Construction Assume 2022 (Percentage of Subtotal 4) 5% $22,067 Subtotal 5 $463,500
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST OPINION - Digester Coating (Phase I)

MATERIAL

SUBTOTAL
LABOR

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION TOTAL
1497
Project: City of Banning MBR
Client: City of Banning MBR
Location: City of Banning
NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST UNIT LABOR UNIT LABOR COST MATERIAL TOTAL Division 01 - General Requirements
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 02 - Site Work
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 03 - Concrete
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 04 - CMU
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 05 - Metals
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 07 - Thermal and Moisture Protection
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 08 - Doors and Windows
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 09 - Finishes
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 10 - Specialties
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 11 - Equipment
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 13 - Speciality
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 15 - Mechanical
4" Piping 100 LF 350$ 35,000$ $35,000
Total $35,000 $35,000
Division 16 - Electrical
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 17 - Instrumentation
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Construction Total $35,000
Contingency and Construction Level of Difficulties 25% $8,750 Subtotal 1 $43,750
Mobilization and Insurance (Percentage of Subtotal 1) 5% $2,188 Subtotal 2 $45,938
General Conditions (Percentage of Subtotal 2) 5% $2,297 Subtotal 3 $48,234
Contractor Profit (Percentage of Subtotal 3) 15% $7,235 Subtotal 4 $55,470
Escalation to Mid-Point of Construction Assume 2022 (Percentage of Subtotal 4) 5% $2,773 Subtotal 5 $58,300
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST OPINION - Replace Piping in Grit Chamber (Phase I)

MATERIAL

SUBTOTAL
LABOR

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION TOTAL
1498
Project: City of Banning MBR
Client: City of Banning MBR
Location: City of Banning
NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST UNIT LABOR UNIT LABOR COST MATERIAL TOTAL Division 01 - General Requirements
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 02 - Site Work
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 03 - Concrete
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 04 - CMU
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 05 - Metals
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 07 - Thermal and Moisture Protection
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 08 - Doors and Windows
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 09 - Finishes
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 10 - Specialties
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 11 - Equipment
Center Drive (2 Total, 1 Per Trickling Filter) 1 LS 250,000$ $250,000 50,000$ $300,000 Total $250,000 $300,000
Division 13 - Speciality
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 15 - Mechanical
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 16 - Electrical
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 17 - Instrumentation
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Construction Total $300,000
Contingency and Construction Level of Difficulties 25% $75,000 Subtotal 1 $375,000
Mobilization and Insurance (Percentage of Subtotal 1) 5% $18,750 Subtotal 2 $393,750
General Conditions (Percentage of Subtotal 2) 5% $19,688 Subtotal 3 $413,438
Contractor Profit (Percentage of Subtotal 3) 15% $62,016 Subtotal 4 $475,453
Escalation to Mid-Point of Construction Assume 2022 (Percentage of Subtotal 4) 5% $23,773 Subtotal 5 $499,300
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST OPINION - Replace TF Center Drives (Phase I)

MATERIAL

SUBTOTAL
LABOR

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION TOTAL
1499
Project: City of Banning MBR
Client: City of Banning MBR
Location: City of Banning
NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST UNIT LABOR UNIT LABOR COST MATERIAL TOTAL Division 01 - General Requirements
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 02 - Site Work
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 03 - Concrete
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 04 - CMU
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 05 - Metals
Pipe Support 1 LS -$ $0 $0
Total $0 $0
Division 07 - Thermal and Moisture Protection
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 08 - Doors and Windows
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 09 - Finishes
Painting and Coating 1 LS -$ $0 $0
Total $0 $0
Division 10 - Specialties
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 11 - Equipment
Center Drive (for East Primary Clarifier) 1 LS 50,000$ $50,000 10,000$ $60,000 Total $50,000 $60,000
Division 13 - Speciality
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 15 - Mechanical
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 16 - Electrical
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 17 - Instrumentation
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Construction Total $60,000
Contingency and Construction Level of Difficulties 25% $15,000 Subtotal 1 $75,000
Mobilization and Insurance (Percentage of Subtotal 1) 5% $3,750 Subtotal 2 $78,750
General Conditions (Percentage of Subtotal 2) 5% $3,938 Subtotal 3 $82,688
Contractor Profit (Percentage of Subtotal 3) 15% $12,403 Subtotal 4 $95,091
Escalation to Mid-Point of Construction Assume 2022 (Percentage of Subtotal 4) 5% $4,755 Subtotal 5 $99,900
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST OPINION - Replace East Primary Clarifier Center Drive (Phase I)

MATERIAL

SUBTOTAL
LABOR

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION TOTAL
1500
Project: City of Banning MBR
Client: City of Banning MBR
Location: City of Banning
NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST UNIT LABOR UNIT LABOR COST MATERIAL TOTAL Division 01 - General Requirements
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 02 - Site Work
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 03 - Concrete
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 04 - CMU
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 05 - Metals
Pipe Support 1 LS -$ $0 $0
Total $0 $0
Division 07 - Thermal and Moisture Protection
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 08 - Doors and Windows
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 09 - Finishes
Painting and Coating 1 LS -$ $0 $0
Total $0 $0
Division 10 - Specialties
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 11 - Equipment
Valves 1 LS -$ $0 -$ $0
Total $0 $0
Division 13 - Speciality
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 15 - Mechanical
2"/3" PVC Piping 50 LF 100$ $5,000 5,000$ $10,000
Total $5,000 $10,000
Division 16 - Electrical
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 17 - Instrumentation
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Construction Total $10,000
Contingency and Construction Level of Difficulties 25% $2,500 Subtotal 1 $12,500
Mobilization and Insurance (Percentage of Subtotal 1) 5% $625 Subtotal 2 $13,125
General Conditions (Percentage of Subtotal 2) 5% $656
Subtotal 3 $13,781
Contractor Profit (Percentage of Subtotal 3) 15% $2,067 Subtotal 4 $15,848
Escalation to Mid-Point of Construction Assume 2022 (Percentage of Subtotal 4) 5% $792 Subtotal 5 $16,700
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST OPINION - Replace Existing PVC Digester Gas Piping (Phase I)

MATERIAL

SUBTOTAL
LABOR

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION TOTAL
1501
Project: City of Banning MBR
Client: City of Banning MBR
Location: City of Banning
NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST UNIT LABOR UNIT LABOR COST MATERIAL TOTAL Division 01 - General Requirements
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 02 - Site Work
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 03 - Concrete
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 04 - CMU
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 05 - Metals
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 07 - Thermal and Moisture Protection
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 08 - Doors and Windows
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 09 - Finishes
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 10 - Specialties
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 11 - Equipment
Hot Water Boiler 1 LS 81,000$ $81,000 25,000$ $106,000
Total $81,000 $106,000
Division 13 - Speciality
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 15 - Mechanical
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 16 - Electrical
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 17 - Instrumentation
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Construction Total $106,000
Contingency and Construction Level of Difficulties 25% $26,500 Subtotal 1 $132,500
Mobilization and Insurance (Percentage of Subtotal 1) 5% $6,625 Subtotal 2 $139,125
General Conditions (Percentage of Subtotal 2) 5% $6,956 Subtotal 3 $146,081
Contractor Profit (Percentage of Subtotal 3) 15% $21,912 Subtotal 4 $167,993
Escalation to Mid-Point of Construction Assume 2022 (Percentage of Subtotal 4) 5% $8,400 Subtotal 5 $176,400
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST OPINION - Replace Digester Hot Water Boiler (Phase I)

MATERIAL

SUBTOTAL
LABOR

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION TOTAL
1502
Project: City of Banning MBR
Client: City of Banning MBR
Location: City of Banning
NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST UNIT LABOR UNIT LABOR COST MATERIAL TOTAL Division 01 - General Requirements
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 02 - Site Work
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 03 - Concrete
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 04 - CMU
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 05 - Metals
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 07 - Thermal and Moisture Protection
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 08 - Doors and Windows
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 09 - Finishes
Painting and Coating 1 LS -$ $0 $0
Total $0 $0
Division 10 - Specialties
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 11 - Equipment
Trickling Filter Distribution Gate Valve (18") 4 EA 20,000$ $80,000 25,000$ $105,000 Total $80,000 $105,000
Division 13 - Speciality
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 15 - Mechanical
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 16 - Electrical
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 17 - Instrumentation
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Construction Total $105,000
Contingency and Construction Level of Difficulties 25% $26,250 Subtotal 1 $131,250
Mobilization and Insurance (Percentage of Subtotal 1) 5% $6,563 Subtotal 2 $137,813
General Conditions (Percentage of Subtotal 2) 5% $6,891 Subtotal 3 $144,703
Contractor Profit (Percentage of Subtotal 3) 15% $21,705 Subtotal 4 $166,409
Escalation to Mid-Point of Construction Assume 2022 (Percentage of Subtotal 4) 5% $8,320 Subtotal 5 $174,800
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST OPINION - Replace TF Effluent Distribution Valves (4) (Phase I)

MATERIAL

SUBTOTAL
LABOR

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION TOTAL
1503
Project: City of Banning MBR
Client: City of Banning MBR
Location: City of Banning
NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST UNIT LABOR UNIT LABOR COST MATERIAL TOTAL Division 01 - General Requirements
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 02 - Site Work
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 03 - Concrete
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 04 - CMU
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 05 - Metals
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 07 - Thermal and Moisture Protection
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 08 - Doors and Windows
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 09 - Finishes
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 10 - Specialties
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 11 - Equipment
Trickling Filter Recirculation Pump (1800 GPM @ 20 ft 15 HP) 2 EA 25,000$ $50,000 25,000$ $75,000 Total $50,000 $75,000
Division 13 - Speciality
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 15 - Mechanical
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 16 - Electrical
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 17 - Instrumentation
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Construction Total $75,000
Contingency and Construction Level of Difficulties 25% $18,750 Subtotal 1 $93,750
Mobilization and Insurance (Percentage of Subtotal 1) 5% $4,688 Subtotal 2 $98,438
General Conditions (Percentage of Subtotal 2) 5% $4,922 Subtotal 3 $103,359
Contractor Profit (Percentage of Subtotal 3) 15% $15,504 Subtotal 4 $118,863
Escalation to Mid-Point of Construction Assume 2022 (Percentage of Subtotal 4) 5% $5,943 Subtotal 5 $124,900
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST OPINION - Replace TF Recirculation Pumps (2) (Phase I)

MATERIAL

SUBTOTAL
LABOR

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION TOTAL
1504
Project: City of Banning MBR
Client: City of Banning MBR
Location: City of Banning
NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST UNIT LABOR UNIT LABOR COST MATERIAL TOTAL Division 01 - General Requirements
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 02 - Site Work
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 03 - Concrete
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 04 - CMU
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 05 - Metals
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 07 - Thermal and Moisture Protection
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 08 - Doors and Windows
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 09 - Finishes
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 10 - Specialties
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 11 - Equipment
Grit/Cyclone Unit (3.6 MGD Capacity) 1 LS 150,000$ $150,000 30,000$ $180,000 Total $150,000 $180,000
Division 13 - Speciality
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 15 - Mechanical
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 16 - Electrical
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 17 - Instrumentation
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Construction Total $180,000
Contingency and Construction Level of Difficulties 25% $45,000 Subtotal 1 $225,000
Mobilization and Insurance (Percentage of Subtotal 1) 5% $11,250 Subtotal 2 $236,250
General Conditions (Percentage of Subtotal 2) 5% $11,813 Subtotal 3 $248,063
Contractor Profit (Percentage of Subtotal 3) 15% $37,209 Subtotal 4 $285,272
Escalation to Mid-Point of Construction Assume 2022 (Percentage of Subtotal 4) 5% $14,264 Subtotal 5 $299,600
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST OPINION - Replace Grit/Cyclone Unit (Phase I)

MATERIAL

SUBTOTAL
LABOR

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION TOTAL
1505
Project: City of Banning MBR
Client: City of Banning MBR
Location: City of Banning
NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST UNIT LABOR UNIT LABOR COST MATERIAL TOTAL Division 01 - General Requirements
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 02 - Site Work
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 03 - Concrete
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 04 - CMU
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 05 - Metals
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 07 - Thermal and Moisture Protection
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 08 - Doors and Windows
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 09 - Finishes
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 10 - Specialties
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 11 - Equipment
Grit Pump (220 GPM @ 50 ft 25 HP) 2 EA 40,000$ $80,000 25,000$ $105,000 Total $80,000 $105,000
Division 13 - Speciality
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 15 - Mechanical
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 16 - Electrical
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 17 - Instrumentation
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Construction Total $105,000
Contingency and Construction Level of Difficulties 25% $26,250 Subtotal 1 $131,250
Mobilization and Insurance (Percentage of Subtotal 1) 5% $6,563 Subtotal 2 $137,813
General Conditions (Percentage of Subtotal 2) 5% $6,891 Subtotal 3 $144,703
Contractor Profit (Percentage of Subtotal 3) 15% $21,705 Subtotal 4 $166,409
Escalation to Mid-Point of Construction Assume 2022 (Percentage of Subtotal 4) 5% $8,320 Subtotal 5 $174,800
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST OPINION - Replace Two Old Grit Pumps (Phase I)

MATERIAL

SUBTOTAL
LABOR

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION TOTAL
1506
Project: City of Banning MBR
Client: City of Banning MBR
Location: City of Banning
NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST UNIT LABOR UNIT LABOR COST MATERIAL TOTAL Division 01 - General Requirements
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 02 - Site Work
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 03 - Concrete
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 04 - CMU
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 05 - Metals
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 07 - Thermal and Moisture Protection
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 08 - Doors and Windows
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 09 - Finishes
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 10 - Specialties
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 11 - Equipment
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 13 - Speciality
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 15 - Mechanical
Banning High School (6" Pipe) 1500 LF 165$ 247,500$ 49,500$ $297,000Dysart Park (6" Pipe) 3500 LF 165$ 577,500$ 115,500$ $693,000Lions Park (6" Pipe) 1500 LF 165$ 247,500$ 49,500$ $297,000 Total $1,072,500 $1,287,000
Division 16 - Electrical
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Division 17 - Instrumentation
Not Used $0
Total $0 $0
Construction Total $1,287,000
Contingency and Construction Level of Difficulties 25% $321,750 Subtotal 1 $1,608,750
Mobilization and Insurance (Percentage of Subtotal 1) 5% $80,438 Subtotal 2 $1,689,188
General Conditions (Percentage of Subtotal 2) 5% $84,459 Subtotal 3 $1,773,647
Contractor Profit (Percentage of Subtotal 3) 15% $266,047 Subtotal 4 $2,039,694
Escalation to Mid-Point of Construction Assume 2022 (Percentage of Subtotal 4) 5% $101,985 Subtotal 5 $2,141,700
PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST OPINION - Recycled Water Laterals (Phase I)

MATERIAL

SUBTOTAL
LABOR

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION

SUBTOTAL

MATERIAL &

INSTALLATION TOTAL
1507
Price/Rate Unit Quantity Recipient Reclamation
Not applicable $ - $ - $ -
$ -
Not applicable percent $ - $ - $ -
$ -
Not applicable $ - $ - $ -
Subtotal $ - $ - $ -
Not applicable $ - $ - $ -
$ -
Phase 1 Costs: City of Banning WWTP Upgrades
Task 1: CEQA
CEQA (bio, cultural, air quality & IS/MND) $180,000 LS 1.0 $ 135,000 $ 45,000 $ 180,000 Permitting $120,000 LS 1.0 $ 90,000 $ 30,000 $ 120,000
$ 300,000
Task 2: Design
Preliminary Design $1,409,808 % of cost 2.0% $ 1,057,356 $ 352,452 $1,409,808 Final Design $5,639,232 % of cost 8.0% $ 4,229,424 $ 1,409,808 $5,639,232 $ 7,049,040
Task 3: Construction
RO system $ 3,497,500 LS 1.0 $ 2,623,125 $ 874,375 $ 3,497,500 Brine Drying Beds and Evaporators $ 5,256,100 LS 1.0 $ 3,942,075 $ 1,314,025 $ 5,256,100 MBR Facility (3.6 MGD) $ 52,887,000 LS 1.0 $ 39,665,250 $ 13,221,750 $ 52,887,000 Primary Clarifier $ 1,944,100 LS 1.0 $ 1,458,075 $ 486,025 $ 1,944,100 Chlorine Tank $ 2,377,700 LS 1.0 $ 1,783,275 $ 594,425 $ 2,377,700 Upgrade Ferric Sulfate Feed/Storage System $ 298,100 LS 1.0 $ 223,575 $ 74,525 $ 298,100 Digester Coating $ 463,500 LS 1.0 $ 347,625 $ 115,875 $ 463,500 Replace Piping in Grit Chamber $ 58,300 LS 1.0 $ 43,725 $ 14,575 $ 58,300 Replace TF Center Drives $ 499,300 LS 1.0 $ 374,475 $ 124,825 $ 499,300 Replace East Primary Clarifier Center Drive $ 99,900 LS 1.0 $ 74,925 $ 24,975 $ 99,900 Replace Existing PVC Digester Gas Piping $ 16,700 LS 1.0 $ 12,525 $ 4,175 $ 16,700 Replace Digester Hot Water Boiler $ 176,400 LS 1.0 $ 132,300 $ 44,100 $ 176,400 Replace TF Effluent Distribution Valves (4) $ 174,800 LS 1.0 $ 131,100 $ 43,700 $ 174,800 Replace TF Recirculation Pumps (2) $ 124,900 LS 1.0 $ 93,675 $ 31,225 $ 124,900 Replace Grit/Cyclone Unit $ 299,600 LS 1.0 $ 224,700 $ 74,900 $ 299,600 Replace Two Old Grit Pumps $ 174,800 LS 1.0 $ 131,100 $ 43,700 $ 174,800 Recycled Water Laterals $ 2,141,700 LS 1.0 $ 1,606,275 $ 535,425 $ 2,141,700 $ 70,490,400
Task 4: Construction Admin
Construction Management and Inspection $7,049,040 % of cost 10.0% $ 5,286,780 $ 1,762,260 $ 7,049,040 Environmental Monitoring and Support during Construction $100,000 LS 1.0% $ 75,000 $ 25,000 $ 100,000 $ 7,149,040
Contingency (10% of project cost) $8,498,848 % of cost 10.0% $ 6,374,136 $ 2,124,712 $ 8,498,848 $ 8,498,848
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS: 70,115,496.00 23,371,832.00 $ 93,487,328 Not applicable $ -
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT/ACTIVITY COSTS: $ 93,487,328

SALARIES AND WAGES

BUDGET ITEM DESCRIPTION

COMPUTATION

TOTAL COST
Subtotal
Subtotal
FRINGE BENEFITS - See proposal in official file for detailed calculations Subtotal
EQUIPMENT - Leased Equipment use rate + hourly wage/salary x est. hours for assisted activity—Describe equipment to be purchased, unit price, # of units for all equipment to be purchased or leased for assisted activity: Do not list contractor supplied equipment here.

SUPPLIES/MATERIALS - Describe all major types of supplies/materials, unit price, # of units, etc., to be used on this assisted activity.

Subtotal
CONTRACTUAL/ CONSTRUCTION - Explain any contracts or sub-Agreements that will be awarded, why needed. Explain contractor qualifications and how the contractor will be selected.

Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
OTHER - List any other cost elements necessary for your project; such as extra reporting, or contingencies in a construction contract.

Subtotal

INDIRECT COSTS -
1508
______________________________________________________________________________ Appendix F
Nitrogen Removal and Plant Reliability Technical Memo

1509
City of Banning
WWTP Upgrade OA Service
Draft Nitrogen Removal and
Plant Reliability Technical Memo
November 27, 2023
N2W Engineering, Inc. T 714.716.1711
3240 El Camino Real, Suite 150 [email protected]
Irvine, CA 92602 www.n2weng.com
1510
Prepared by: Iris Jimenez and Jamal Awad
Reviewed by: James Wang
1511

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this memo is to evaluate biological treatment alternatives for nitrogen removal and the production of recycled water for the City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Wastewater treatment stages considered for this evaluation included biological, tertiary, and solids treatments. Several process options were assessed within each treatment stage to develop a list of wastewater treatment alternatives for further evaluation. The treatment alternatives are evaluated based on estimated construction and operating costs, operational issues, site constraints, and the ability to comply with current and future regulatory requirements.

Additionally, this evaluation considered existing treatment process operations, and the ability to upgrade or reuse facilities for future use. The viable wastewater treatment alternatives developed from the evaluation are listed below:

Alternative 1 - Return Flow from Trickling Filter Effluent to Primary Clarifier Alternative 2 - Conventional Activated Sludge
Alternative 3 - Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor
Alternative 4 - Membrane Bioreactor
The recommended alternative is the Membrane Bioreactor based on its expandability, operational reliability, effluent quality, and flexibility to meet future permit and reuse requirements.

1512
1 BACKGROUND
The City of Banning (City) owns and operates a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) located at 2242 East Charles Street, Banning, California 92220. The WWTP has a design treatment capacity of 3.6 million gallons per day (MGD) and currently discharges an average of 2.07 MGD into 10 unlined evaporation/percolation ponds. Future (Year 2035) average flow is expected to increase to 3.6 MGD. The treated effluent then percolates into the groundwater of the San Gorgonio Hydraulic Unit. Groundwater from this basin is used for municipal, industrial, and agricultural applications.

1.1 Regional Water Quality Control Board Order
On June 30, 2016, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board adopted Board Order R7- 2016-0015, which describes the Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) and other terms and conditions of operation for the WWTP. The Board Order requires the WWTP to remove constituents that present the greatest risk to groundwater quality such as nitrogen, coliforms, and total dissolved solid (TDS). According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), the maximum contaminant level (MCL) for Nitrate as Nitrogen is 10 mg/L. Per the Board Order, it is assumed all nitrogen available converts to nitrate/nitrite so Total Nitrogen (TN) is used as the measurement of concern. The wastewater effluent limitations per the Board Order are outlined in Table 1.

Table 1. WWTP effluent limitations per Board Order R7-2016-0015 Parameter 30-Day Average 7-Day Average
20°C BOD5 30 mg/L 45 mg/L
TSS 30 mg/L 45 mg/L
pH 6.0 - 9.0
30-Day Daily Dry
Weather Discharge < 3.6 MGD
DO Upper Zone of the Ponds > 1.0 mg/L
TDS Not to Exceed 300 mg/L above the Water
Supply
TN* 10 mg-N/L
*City does not need to comply with this limit at this time Currently, the average TN concentration in the WWTP’s effluent is 27 mg-N/L, well above the future TN limit of 10 mg-N/L specified in Board Order R7-2016-0015. As a result, the City will need to upgrade the biological treatment process at the WWTP to lower the TN below 10 mg-N/L.

1.2 Title 22 Requirements
The City is interested in utilizing WWTP effluent for beneficial non-potable reuse applications such as landscape, public parks, and golf course irrigation. However, the WWTP effluent, based 1513
on the Annual Operations Monitoring Report for 2022, does not comply with California’s water recycling criteria outlined in Title 22, Code of Regulations. To comply with Title 22 requirements, the effluent must meet the following requirements:
• Average daily turbidity less than 2 nephelometric turbidity unit (NTU); approximately 3 – 5 mg/L TSS.
• Effluent cannot exceed 5 NTU more than 5% of the time. • Effluent cannot exceed 10 NTU at any time.
• Coagulant must be added if the influent to the filter exceeds 5 NTU for more than 15 minutes, or 10 NTU at any time.
• The disinfection process must provide a chlorine residual that provides 450 milligramminutes per liter (mg-min/L) under minimal modal contact time (CT) of 90 minutes. o This corresponds to a residual of 5 mg/L or less, or any process that achieves 5-log virus removal.
• Total coliform cannot exceed the average most probable number (MPN) of 2.2 per 100 milliliters (mL).
• No more than one sample per month can exceed an MPN of 23 per 100 mL.

The WWTP currently discharges 27 mg/L TN and 20 mg/L TSS. In order to meet tertiary requirements, the City will be required to improve the removal efficiency of the existing WWTP to comply with the TN, turbidity, and disinfection requirements.

1.3 Beaumont Basin Plan Requirements
The largest potential recycled water user for the City of Banning is Sun Lakes Country Club, a golf course located above the Beaumont Basin Management Zone. In order to serve recycled water to Sun Lakes, the WWTP effluent must meet the Beaumont Basin maximum benefit objectives for TDS and TN of 330 mg/L and 5 mg/L, respectively. With a current average TDS of 390 mg/L and TN of 27 mg/L, the WWTP effluent does not meet either of these limits. Due to these restrictions, and potential stricter limits for the San Gorgonio region in the future, the City will need to implement a reverse osmosis train post-secondary treatment to further reduce the WWTP’s TDS and TN levels.

The purpose of this technical memo is to evaluate potential treatment alternatives for the WWTP that comply with the Regional Water Quality Board Order as well as Title 22 and Beaumont Basin Management Zone requirements for tertiary water, and recommend the most suitable system for the City.

1514
2 BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES
Four viable biological treatment options were selected for evaluation to treat the anticipated average daily flow of 3.6 MGD. The treatment alternatives include:

1. Return Flow from Trickling Filter Effluent to Primary Clarifier

2. Conventional Activated Sludge

3. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor

4. Membrane Bioreactor
For Alternatives 2-4, BioWin modeling results from the 2020 Banning Nitrogen Removal Feasibility Study (2020 Study) were used to compare effluent water quality. For Alternative 1, a new BioWin simulation was conducted to determine a different strategy that would allow the existing trickling filters to comply with the Board Order TN requirements. The previous design from the 2020 Study of increasing the recirculation of the trickling filters to 350% was ruled out, as this only lowered the final TN to 9.92 mg/L, just below the Board Order requirement of 10 mg/L. Alternative 1, as currently being considered, would send recirculation flow from the trickling filters back to primary influent.

2.1 Alternative No. 1: Return Flow from Trickling Filter Effluent to Primary Clarifier

2.1.1 Overview
Trickling Filters (TF) are currently utilized by the City at the WWTP. TF, shown in Figure 1, is an aerobic attached growth process used for secondary treatment. It consists of a tank filled with different types of media such as crushed stone, rocks, or plastic materials ranging in size from 2 – 4 inches. Wastewater is distributed by a rotary distributor arm over the top area of a vessel containing non-submerged packing material. As the wastewater trickles through the bed, microbial growth on the media forms a biofilm. The organic material in the wastewater is degraded by microorganisms attached to the biofilm. Some of the ammonia nitrogen in the wastewater is oxidized by nitrifying bacteria to nitrate or nitrite to nitrogen. An essential element of the trickling filter design and operation is the recirculation of effluent to the filter media for process optimization and increased treatment performance.

There are four basic trickling filter types: low-rate, intermediate-rate, high-rate, and roughing filters. Low-rate filters are loaded at less than 40 kg BOD5 per day. The residual solids are usually well digested, producing a higher quality secondary effluent. Intermediate-rate filters are loaded up to 64 kg BOD5 per day. This system requires wastewater recirculation to ensure sufficient effluent quality. High-rate filters have a maximum organic load, ranging from 64 – 160 kg BOD5 per day. In this system, a secondary filtration stage is required to achieve effluent standards.

Roughing filters are typically loaded from 160 – 480 kg BOD5 per day. Overall, low-rate and highrate trickling filters achieve the highest organic removal rates. 1515
Figure 1. Trickling filters at the City WWTP
Advantages Disadvantages
• Simplicity in biological operation
• Low energy requirements
• Low maintenance requirements
• Low sludge production
• Appropriate for small and medium sized
communities
• No problems of sludge bulking in
secondary clarifiers
• Improved sludge thickening abilities
• Durable process elements
• Low loading rate requirements depending on
media
• Diffusion limitations and possibility of mass
transfer
• Higher BOD5 and solid concentrations in the
effluent
• Issues with biofilm maintenance due to
excess sloughing
• Odor problems
• Low efficiency at cold temperatures

2.1.2 Implementation at the WWTP
The existing operation of the trickling filters does not allow for sufficient N/DN to occur. One way to reduce trickling filter nitrate is to recycle trickling filter effluent to the headworks. Any denitrification achieved in the headworks and primary clarifiers would not only reduce the BOD in the primary effluent but also reduce the nitrate in the secondary effluent.

A recirculation pump, with a capacity of 1,400 gpm, will be installed at the Trickling Filter Recirculation Station. The pump will take trickling filter effluent and deliver it to the headworks at the Grit Chamber Splitter Box. Based on BioWin modeling results, the expected secondary effluent for the constituents of concern is provided in Table 2. As seen in Table 2, the operation of the trickling filters will comply with BOD5 and TN effluent goals. However, to confirm that this approach will effectively lower TN levels, a 2-month pilot test will be conducted at the Plant. 1516
Table 2. Secondary effluent water quality for Alternative 1 Parameter Secondary Effluent Water Quality
BOD5 24.74 mg/L
TSS 6.31 mg/L
TN 7.50 mg-N/L
A summary of the capital, annual O&M, and 20-year life cycle costs for Alternative 1 to comply with Board Order and Title 22 requirements is shown in Table 3. Annual O&M costs include pump power consumption, chemicals (NaOCl and polymers), and labor and maintenance of equipment.

Due to the age and condition of the existing TFs, the remaining service life of both TFs is expected to be 10 years maximum. Therefore, although the capital cost only involves the addition of the recirculation flow, the 20-year life cycle cost includes the replacement of both TFs in 2035.

A tertiary filter is required to comply with Title 22 turbidity requirements, and ultrafiltration is needed to meet the Beaumont Basin maximum benefit objectives. If the pilot test is unsuccessful, a denitrification filter will need to be implemented rather than the proposed recirculation flow to the primary clarifier.

Table 3. Capital, O&M, and life cycle cost summary for Alternative 1 Cost Component Cost
Capital
Recirculation to Primary Clarifier $705,500
Tertiary Filter $2,721,000
Ultrafiltration $5,900,000
Anaerobic Digester $2,100,000
Total Capital Cost $11,426,500
Annual O&M
Power $196,574
Chemical $18,750
Labor and Maintenance $1,080,000
Total O&M Cost $1,098,750
20-Year Life Cycle Cost
$44,768,000

1517

2.2 Alternative No. 2: Conventional Activated Sludge

2.2.1 Overview
The conventional activated sludge (CAS) process, shown in Figure 2, is a biological wastewater treatment system where various microorganisms growing as suspended flocs, called mixed liquor, degrade organic matter in the wastewater. The mixed liquor settles in the secondary clarifiers, effluent is discharged for further treatment, and the microorganisms are recirculated back to the bioreactor as return activated sludge (RAS). Oxygen is provided by blowers and diffusers to facilitate the growth of microorganisms. Excess sludge is wasted so that the system can be operated at a target solids retention time.

The conventional activated sludge process can be modified for biological nitrogen removal. This is accomplished by dividing the bioreactor into the aerobic zone and anoxic zone (where no oxygen is provided). Ammonia in the wastewater is oxidized to nitrite and nitrate in the aerobic zone, whereas nitrate and nitrite are denitrified to nitrogen gas in the anoxic zone. In the modified Ludzack-Ettinger (MLE) configuration, the anoxic zone is placed upstream of the aerobic zone. Nitrate and nitrite are recirculated back to from the end of the aerobic zone to the anoxic zone for denitrification. Other configurations, such as the step-feed activated sludge process, have also been used successfully for nitrogen removal.

Figure 2. Conventional activated sludge flow diagram
Advantages Disadvantages
• Plenty of operating experience
• Uniform mixing in aeration tanks
• High oxygen transfer efficiency
• Solid and liquid stream separation
• High quality effluent
• High operational cost
• Sludge disposal requirement
• Diffusers require regular cleaning

2.2.2 Implementation at the WWTP
Conventional activated sludge is one of the most common biological nutrient removal systems in the United States. New bioreactors with anoxic and aerobic zones will need to be constructed for 1518
this system. The City owns the property immediately to the west of the WWTP where the proposed CAS system could be located. The existing trickling filters will be decommissioned, while the existing primary clarifiers and primary effluent pump station will remain in operation. The existing secondary clarifiers will not be suitable for the increased flow as the underflow drain is only 6” in diameter. The new RAS line needs to be at least 12” in diameter to handle the increased RAS flows. New rectangular clarifiers will need to be constructed north of the bioreactors to handle half (1.8 MGD) of the average daily flow. An external carbon source is not necessary for this option. Modeled secondary effluent water quality from the 2020 Study is provided in Table

4. Table 4. Secondary effluent water quality for Alternative 2 Parameter Secondary Effluent Water Quality
BOD5 4.78 mg/L
TSS 10.96 mg/L
TN 7.49 mg-N/L
A summary of the capital, annual O&M, and 20-year life cycle costs for Alternative 2 is shown in Table 5. A tertiary filter is required to comply with Title 22 turbidity requirements, and ultrafiltration is needed to meet the Beaumont Basin maximum benefit objectives. Annual O&M costs are based on power, chemical (NaOCl and polymer), and labor and maintenance.

Table 5. Capital, O&M, and life cycle cost summary for Alternative 2 Cost Component Cost
Capital
Activated Sludge System $48,910,800
Tertiary Filter $2,721,000
Ultrafiltration $5,900,000
Anaerobic Digester -
Total Capital Cost $57,531,800
Annual O&M
Power $1,310,496
Chemical $18,750
Labor and Maintenance $1,080,000
Total O&M Cost $2,409,246
20-Year Life Cycle Cost
$119,328,000
1519

2.3 Alternative No. 3: Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor

2.3.1 Overview
The moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) process, shown in Figure 3, is a biological treatment process that was developed by combining the conventional activated sludge system and suspended biofilm carrier media. This process incorporates polyethylene or other material media that provides surface area for the growth of heterotrophic and autotrophic bacteria biofilm in uniformly mixed tanks. The MBBR contains media with a surface area ranging from 400 – 600 m2/m3. A final clarifier is used to remove suspended solids and to produce a clarified effluent.

Settled sludge can be returned to the bioreactor if necessary.

MBBRs may be used for aerobic, anoxic, or anaerobic processes. The system can handle high organic loads and high substrate concentrations. Nitrification rates are influenced by the organic load, dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration, ammonium nitrogen concentration, temperature, pH, and alkalinity in the reactor.

Figure 3. MBBR system components (courtesy of Veolia)
Advantages Disadvantages
• Backwash is not necessary
• A high specific biofilm surface area
• Continuous operation of the reactor without clogging
• Ability to increase the plant capacity without
expansion of existing reactor volume
• Easy to operate
• Stable operation at low temperature
• Long life expectancy of biofilm media carriers
• Media can wash out over
time; regular cleaning of
effluent screens
• Longer start up time
requirement
• Bacterial activity has to be
monitored periodically
• Cost of the media

2.3.2 Implementation at the WWTP
For the MBBR system, plastic biocarriers are suspended in the aerobic and anoxic tanks to allow for microorganism growth. The primary effluent enters a common influent channel where flow is evenly distributed into the four tanks. The first tank is aerobic where heterotrophs are predominant and organic removal primarily occurs. The next tank is also aerobic, but the conditions are enhanced for the growth of nitrifiers for ammonia removal. From here, wastewater enters the anoxic tank where denitrification occurs. With this process configuration, 1520
an external carbon source such as methanol or glycerol is added to promote denitrification.

Alternatively, the City can reverse this process by having an anoxic tank upstream of the aeration tanks and utilize an internal recycle to maintain the carbon requirements for denitrification. This would decrease chemical costs but increase power costs due to additional pumping requirements. A final, small polishing reaeration step is included to re-add oxygen back into the wastewater for the purpose of downstream processes that require oxygen in the system. The secondary effluent is conveyed to the existing secondary clarifiers where a small portion of the sludge is returned to the reaeration tanks. The reactors will be equipped with media retention screens to keep the media elements from leaving the MBBR basins. Modeled secondary effluent water quality from the 2020 Study is provided in Table 6.

Table 6. Secondary effluent water quality for Alternative 3 Parameter Secondary Effluent Water Quality
BOD5 4.34 mg/L
TSS 6.64 mg/L
TN 8.00 mg-N/L
A summary of the capital, annual O&M, and 20-year life cycle costs for Alternative 3 is shown in Table 7. A tertiary filter is required to comply with Title 22 turbidity requirements, and ultrafiltration is needed to meet the Beaumont Basin maximum benefit objectives. Annual O&M costs are based on power, chemical (NaOCl, methanol, and polymer), and labor and maintenance.

Table 7. Capital, O&M, and life cycle cost summary for Alternative 3 Cost Component Cost
Capital
MBBR $39,346,500
Denitrification Filter -
Tertiary Filter $2,721,000
Ultrafiltration $5,900,000
Anaerobic Digester $2,100,000
Total Capital Cost $50,067,500
Annual O&M
Power $1,474,308
Chemical $18,750
Labor and Maintenance $1,080,000
Total O&M Cost $2,573,058
20-Year Life Cycle Cost
$116,048,000
1521

2.4 Alternative No. 4: Membrane Bioreactor

2.4.1 Overview
Membrane Bioreactors (MBRs), shown in Figure 4, consist of a biological reactor with suspended biomass and solids separation by microfiltration or ultrafiltration membranes with the nominal pore size ranging from 0.07 – 2.0 μm and 0.008 – 0.2 μm, respectively. MBRs can be operated at higher MLSS concentrations (8,000 – 12,000 mg/L), as a result, the reactor size is reduced. Solids liquid separation is accomplished with membranes instead of clarifiers. There are two fundamental arrangements of MBRs: (1) integrated systems that have membranes immersed in an activated sludge reactor and (2) separate systems that have a membrane module placed outside the reactor. Immersed MBRs typically use hollow fiber membranes that operate at lower pressures, accommodate various types of biosolids, concentrate biosolids without settling concerns, and have lower life-cycle costs. Separate systems are typically pressure driven and the membranes are in a stand-alone tank. Properly configured, the MBR process removes nitrogen similar to the activated sludge process.

Figure 4. MBR Facility (courtesy of KY OCP)
Advantages Disadvantages
• Higher MLSS concentrations
therefore a small footprint
• Less sludge production due to
longer SRT design
• High effluent quality
• No secondary clarifier is needed
• Better site planning for City
WWTP
• No UF pretreatment for future
RO
• High capital costs (membranes)
• High energy costs compared to the
conventional process due to membrane
scouring
• Limited time on membrane life
• High cost membrane replacement
1522

2.4.1.1 Packaged vs Non-Packaged System
There are two options to consider for an MBR system: a packaged or non-packaged system. The main differences between the two options are cost, schedule, and aesthetics. Unlike packaged MBR systems which comprise of pre-engineered, prefabricated structures, non-packaged MBR systems require the contractor to source all related equipment, resulting in higher costs and longer construction schedules. Typically, packaged MBR systems involve stainless-steel tanks while non-packaged systems involve concrete tanks; the significant site work and material cost required for the construction of concrete costs also contribute to the higher overall cost of nonpackaged systems. As for aesthetics, concrete structures are more common at existing municipal treatment plants. However, a prefabricated building can be built around a packaged MBR system for appearance purposes.

2.4.2 Implementation at the WWTP
The MBR system combines conventional biological nutrient removal with the use of membranes for the separation of solids and treated effluent. The MBR process train is similar to Alternative 2 except that membranes replace the secondary clarifiers and tertiary filters. The design MLSS of the MBR system is also much higher than Alternatives 2, which allows for greater treatment capacity per unit volume of the aeration basin. One design note is that the high recycle from the membrane aeration zone impacts the denitrification ability and the carbon demand.

Consequently, a tank will be provided to allow the DO to decrease by endogenous respiration before the recycle stream is returned to the anoxic zone.

Membrane fouling is controlled by several methods of cleaning which includes the chemical clean in place (CIP) system, relaxation, and air scouring. Chemical CIP cleaning is also referred to as maintenance cleaning used to address irreversible fouling. This type of cleaning usually occurs at least 10 times a year and is completely automated; however, it can also be manually operated as needed. The membrane units are cleaned in place quickly by injecting a dilute solution of bleach into the permeate line which remains in the membranes for 1 to 3 hours and then the normal operation is resumed. During the cleaning of one basin, the other basins are left online and operated at a slightly higher flux rate as required to meet plant demand. Although this type of cleaning is efficient, the addition of chemicals will degrade any membrane material over time.

Therefore, replacement of the membranes will be required.

There are two types of membranes available for wastewater applications: hollow fiber and flat sheet. Hollow fiber membranes are constructed of a microporous structure and are densely packed into tubes to create the membrane module. These tightly packed modules allow for high membrane surface areas and high outside pressure tolerance. Typically, flow is applied to the outside of the membranes and permeate is removed via the inner tube of the module. However, some manufacturers offer the opposite (in-out) flow pattern. The typical vacuum pressure applied to the hollow fiber membranes is around 10 pounds per square inch (psi). Flat sheet membranes are constructed of paper-like backing material with a membrane cast on the surface of the paper. These plates are submerged into the membrane tank, and permeate pass through 1523
the membrane from the outside in. The membranes allow the biofilm to attach and are continuously aerated to prevent solids buildup.

Modeled secondary effluent water quality from the 2020 Study is provided in Table 8.

Table 8. Secondary effluent water quality for Alternative 4 Parameter Secondary Effluent Water Quality
BOD5 0.86 mg/L
TSS 0.00 mg/L
TN 7.74 mg-N/L
A summary of the capital, annual O&M, and 20-year life cycle costs for Alternative 4 is shown in Table 9. Annual O&M costs are based on power, chemical, and labor and maintenance. Chemical costs include NaOCl, polymer, citric acid, sodium bisulfite, and sodium hydroxide. Costs are based on the hollow fiber membrane type and include a range of costs from a non-packaged to a packaged system.

Table 9. Capital, O&M, and life cycle cost summary for Alternative 4 Cost Component Cost
Capital
MBR $52,887,000 - $68,996,868
Tertiary Filter -
Ultrafiltration -
Anaerobic Digester -
Total Capital Cost $52,887,000 - $68,996,868
Annual O&M
Power $1,638,120
Chemical $37,500
Labor and Maintenance $1,200,000
Total O&M Cost $2,875,620
20-Year Life Cycle Cost
$126,344,000 - $142,454,000

1524
3 COMPARISON OF TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES
A comprehensive summary of the capital, annual O&M, and 20-year life cycle costs for the wastewater treatment alternatives developed for the City of Banning is shown in Table 10. The 20-year life cycle cost shows that Alternative 1 is the least expensive alternative. This alternative is essentially the baseline scenario to comply with Board Order and Title 22 requirements at 3.6 MGD and utilizes the existing treatment process as much as possible. However, this alternative provides the least flexibility regarding expected effluent water quality, particularly for BOD5 and TN. If future discharge permit limits become more stringent, or other constituents, such as phosphorus, become regulated, upgrades to Alternative 1 would be challenging and costly.

Table 10. Cost comparison summary for the treatment alternatives Treatment Alternative Capital Annual O&M 20-Year Life Cycle Alternative 1 Trickling Filter $11,426,500 $1,098,750 $44,768,000 Alternative 2 Activated
Sludge
$57,531,800 $2,409,246 $119,328,000
Alternative 3 MBBR $50,067,500 $2,573,058 $116,048,000
Alternative 4 MBR $52,887,000 - $68,996,868 $2,875,620 $126,344,000 - $142,454,000 The cost comparison summary identifies three groupings of the treatment alternatives.

Alternative 1 is the cheapest all-around option. Life cycle costs for Alternatives 2 and 3 are within $3,000,000 of one another and utilize the same treatment process with slightly varied components that alter the overall process operation. Between Alternatives 2 and 3, Alternative 3 provides the lower capital cost option due to the reduction in required tank size as compared to conventional activated sludge. Alternative 4 has an expensive capital cost, since the MBR system produces the highest effluent water quality. The capital cost for Alternatives 2 and 4 are relatively close to one another. However, the annual O&M costs show that Alternative 4 becomes more costly over a 20-year life cycle.

A breakdown of the required WWTP upgrades to meet Board Order requirements and Title 22 regulations for each alternative is provided in Table 11. The tertiary filter and ultrafiltration costs are the same for Alternatives 1 – 3, and not required for Alternative 4. Alternatives 2 and 4 do not require any additional anaerobic digesters, while Alternatives 1 and 3 will require a new anaerobic digester.
1525
Table 11. Unit operation cost comparison for the treatment alternatives Unit Alternative 1 Trickling
Filter
Alternative 2 Activated
Sludge Alternative 3 MBBR Alternative 4 MBR
Recirculation to
Primary Clarifier $705,500 - - -
Activated
Sludge - $48,910,800 - -
MBBR - - $39,346,500 -
MBR - - - $52,887,000 -
$68,996,868
Tertiary Filter $2,721,000 $2,721,000 $2,721,000 -
Ultrafiltration $5,900,000 $5,900,000 $5,900,000 -
Anaerobic
Digester $2,100,000 - $2,100,000 -
Total $11,426,500 $57,531,800 $50,067,500 $52,887,000 - $68,996,868
A comparison of the expected secondary effluent water quality for all alternatives is provided in Table 12. The concentrations presented do not reflect tertiary filter effluent to show the comparison between biological treatment systems. All the alternatives comply with the Board Order requirements with respect to nitrogen. Compared to Alternative 1, Alternatives 2 – 4 produce better water quality, can meet possible more stringent discharge limits, and have better flexibility to stay in compliance if treatment efficiency degrades. Alternative 4 produces the best all-around effluent water quality, and an additional tertiary filter is not required to comply with Title 22 requirements unlike Alternatives 1 – 3.

Table 12. Secondary effluent water quality comparison for the treatment alternatives Parameter
Secondary Treatment Effluent Concentration (mg/L)
Alternative 1
Trickling Filter
Alternative 2
Activated Sludge
Alternative 3
MBBR
Alternative 4
MBR
BOD5 24.74 4.78 4.34 0.86
TSS 6.31 10.96 6.64 0
TN 7.50 7.49 8.00 7.74
Non-monetary criteria for the alternatives are compared in Table 13. The criteria for each alternative were given a ranking from 1 to 5; 5 being the best (and in terms of footprint, smallest), and 1 being the worst (and in terms of footprint, largest). Alternative 1 is the least scalable, operationally reliable, and flexible to meet permit requirements when compared to Alternatives 2-4. Alternatives 2 and 3 are similar in terms of operational reliability, ease of operation, flexibility 1526
to meet permit requirements, footprint, and Title 22 reuse capability, but Alternative 3 is the more scalable of the two. Alternative 4 is the most scalable and operationally reliable of all alternatives, and because an MBR system does not require a secondary clarifier, it has the smallest overall footprint. Alternative 4 is also the only alternative that does not require additional filtration for Title 22 reuse. For overall rankings, Alternative 4 has the best score, followed by Alternative 3, Alternative 2, then Alternative 1.

Table 13. Non-monetary comparison summary for the treatment alternatives Treatment
Alternative
Scalability Operational
Reliability
Ease of
Operation
Flexibility to
Meet Permit
Requirements
Footprint Title 22
Reuse
Total Score
Alternative
1 Trickling
Filter
1 2 5 1 1 1 11
Alternative
2 Activated
Sludge
3 4 3 3 3 4 20
Alternative
3 MBBR
4 4 3 3 3 4 21
Alternative
4 MBR
5 5 2 5 5 5 27

1527
4 SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The cost evaluation suggests that Alternative 1 is the cheapest option available to comply with Board Order and Title 22 requirements. However, based on the capacity of the existing infrastructure, this option has the least flexibility to maintain effluent TN treatment goals, and the existing trickling filter components are old and will require replacement within the next 10 years. Therefore, this alternative is not recommended for future implementation.

Alternatives 2 – 3 are similar in cost and operation. Among them,

1. Alternative 2 (CAS) are ubiquitous throughout the United States, are reliable to meet discharge limits, easy to operate, and have the ability to be upgraded with IFAS or MBBR in the future if required. However, these systems require a larger footprint as compared to Alternative 4 to meet effluent requirements.

2. Alternative 3 (MBBR) produces the best secondary effluent water quality out of these two alternatives and is the lowest capital and life cycle cost option. However, Alternative 3 is more complex to operate, requires an external carbon input, and the number of municipal installations in the United States is significantly less than Alternative 2.

Alternative 4 (MBR) can be the most expensive alternative, depending on whether a packaged or non-packaged system is selected, but it produces the best water quality. With advances in technology, the MBR system can also be operated fairly autonomously and does not require much operator input. Additionally, the City is familiar with the design of MBRs based on the 90% design of an MBR facility in 2007.

Alternative 4 also sets the City up for any changes to discharge or reuse requirements in the future. Unlike Alternatives 1 – 3, MBR systems have built-in filtration, and therefore they can produce recycled water without the use of tertiary filters as well as meet the Beaumont Basin Plan TDS and TN requirements without ultrafiltration.

Furthermore, since MBR is modular, it allows the system to be phased into the Plant. In the first phase of upgrades, one approach is to keep the two TFs in operation and install an additional 1.5 MGD MBR at the Plant. This option involves sending 1.5 MGD to the MBR for recycled water irrigation use. For the remaining 2.1 MGD, the Alternative 1 strategy of sending a return flow from the TF effluent to the headworks would be implemented to allow the 2.1 MGD to flow through the TFs then discharge into the percolation ponds. As recycled water demands increase and the TFs reach the end of their service lives, more MBR modules can be phased in for increased capacity until the total 3.6 MGD future average flow is treated by MBR.

Therefore, due to its high effluent water quality, operational ease, flexibility to meet more stringent permit regulations, and scalability, a Membrane Bioreactor is recommended to be considered for future implementation.
1528
______________________________________________________________________________ Appendix G
WDR Board Order R7-2016-0015
1529
1530
1531
1532
1533
1534
1535
1536
1537
1538
1539
1540
1541
1542
1543
1544
1545
1546
1547
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
City of Banning
Wastewater Treatment Plant
Equalization Basin Project
May 2021
Preliminary Engineering Report
533 W 2600 S Suite 275, Bountiful, UT 84010
Phone: 801.299.1327 | Fax: 801.299.0153
1558

TABLE OF CONTENTS
WEBB/Aqua Engineering i Innovative Engineering Solutions

1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 3

1.1. PROJECT APPROACH ................................................................................................. 3

2. EXISTING FACILITIES .......................................................................................... 4

2.1. DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING FACILITIES ..................................................................... 4

2.1.1. Detention Pond ................................................................................................. 4

2.1.2. Primary Clarifiers ............................................................................................... 5

2.1.3. Primary Effluent Pump Station ............................................................................ 5

2.1.4. Humus Recirculation Pump Station ...................................................................... 5

3. PROPOSED FACILITIES AND MODIFICATIONS .................................................... 7

3.1. EQUALIZATION BASIN SIZING ................................................................................... 7

3.1.1. DIURNAL EQUALIZATION BASIN SIZING.............................................................. 7

3.2. DIURNAL EQUALIZATION BASIN STRUCTURE .............................................................. 9

3.3. DIURNAL EQUALIZATION BASIN OPERATION ............................................................ 10

3.3.1. Flow Control .................................................................................................... 10

3.3.2. Equalization Basin Maintenance ......................................................................... 10

3.3.3. Odor Control ................................................................................................... 12

3.4. EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP STATION ..................................................................... 12

3.5. WET WEATHER FLOW STORAGE BASIN .................................................................... 13

3.6. WET WEATHER FLOW STORAGE BASIN SIZING ......................................................... 14

3.7. WET WEATHER FLOW STORAGE BASIN STRUCTURE.................................................. 15

3.8. WET WEATHER STORAGE BASIN OPERATION ........................................................... 16

3.8.1. Flow Control .................................................................................................... 16

3.8.2. Storage Basin Maintenance ............................................................................... 16

3.8.3. Odor Control ................................................................................................... 17

3.9. SITE WORK AND YARD PIPING ................................................................................ 17

3.10. ELECTRICAL ........................................................................................................... 17

3.10.1. Proposed Electrical Design ................................................................................ 17

3.10.2. Controls and Instrumentation ............................................................................ 19

3.10.3. NFPA Classifications ......................................................................................... 19

3.11. SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION ............................................................................... 19

3.12. VALUE ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................. 19

4. OPINION OF COST ............................................................................................. 20 TABLES
Existing Recirculation Pumps ................................................................................. 5 Preliminary Equalization Pump Station Design Parameters ...................................... 13 Storage Basin Options Relative Costs .................................................................... 16 Project Opinion of Cost ....................................................................................... 20 Alternate Project Opinion of Cost ......................................................................... 21

FIGURES
Figure A. Existing Detention Pond ............................................................................................. 4 Figure B. Existing Primary Effluent Pump Station ......................................................................... 5 Figure C. Recirculation Pump Station Schematic ......................................................................... 6 Figure D. City of Banning WWTP Historic Average and Unit Diurnal Flow Curve ............................. 8 Figure E. Flow vs Equalization Basin Storage Curve ..................................................................... 9 Figure F. Duckbill and Flap gates (Courtesy of Red Valve and Hydro-Gate) .................................. 10 Figure G. Automatic Tipping Buckets (Courtesy of Ovivo) .......................................................... 11 1559

TABLE OF CONTENTS
WEBB/Aqua Engineering ii Innovative Engineering Solutions Figure H. Typical Washdown Monitor Hydrant .......................................................................... 12 Figure I. Self-Priming Pump (Courtesy of Gormann-Rupp) .......................................................... 13 Figure J. Wet Weather Flow Design Diurnal Curve .................................................................... 14 Figure K. Flow vs. Storage Curve for Combined Equalization and Wet Weather Storage Basin ....... 15 Figure L. Electrical Enclosure Options (precast concrete or metal panels) .................................... 18

APPENDICES
APPENDIX A – PRELIMINARY DESIGN (60%) DRAWINGS
APPENDIX B – SAMPLE FLOW CHART
05-07-2021
1560
WEBB/Aqua Engineering 3 Innovative Engineering Solutions

1. INTRODUCTION
The City of Banning desires to construct equalization basins at the existing Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) to mitigate the daily and wet weather flow variations received at the plant. Specifically, the City would like to construct two distinct basins at the existing plant site. The first basin will be used to equalize the daily diurnal flows received by the plant. The second basin will primarily be utilized during large “wet weather flow” events to store the additional plant flow.

The key objective of this Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) is to discuss the approach and identify principal design criteria associated with the City of Banning WWTP Equalization Basin construction project. Specifically, this report addresses and describes the following:
 Conceptual project approach
 Relevant existing facilities
 Determination of required equalization volumes
 Description and preliminary layouts of proposed equalization basins, auxiliary facilities, and potential modifications to existing facility
 Preliminary opinion of cost.

1.1.PROJECT APPROACH
The project approach assumes the proposed basins will receive plant influent flows following the primary treatment processes (screening, grit removal and primary clarification). This means the primary treatment processes will continue to experience diurnal and wet weather flow variations.

However, the maintenance and operation of the proposed equalization basins will be simplified. The main reason for this is that a significant quantity of rags, grit, and larger debris will be removed from the influent flow prior to entering the equalization and storage basins. Thus, the equalization and storage basins will accumulate less debris, requiring less cleaning and maintenance by operations staff.

Flow from the primary clarifiers will be gravity conveyed to the equalization basin, as illustrated in the preliminary hydraulic profile and process flow schematic drawings included in Appendix A. Specifically, the existing primary effluent piping will be intercepted with a new 20-inch pipe (PVC, C-900) which will convey the flow to the new diurnal equalization basin, as shown in attached drawings. Available record drawings indicate that a portion of an existing 18-inch bypass line could be used for this purpose. However, due to age and unknown condition of this pipe, this preliminary effort assumes that a new pipe will be constructed.

As noted previously, two basins are proposed to be constructed. The smaller diurnal equalization basin will attenuate variation of typical daily flows. During infrequent wet weather flows, or other conditions where the capacity of the diurnal equalization basin is exceeded, liquid will overflow into the larger wet weather flow storage basin. Typically, the plant average day flow (ADF) will be discharged from the equalization basin(s) to the downstream secondary treatment processes using an equalization basin pump station. The diurnal equalization basin will be sized to allow daily emptying at the plant design flows. Based on the operational preference, the wet weather storage basin may require several days to empty. Alternatively, increased discharge (higher than ADF) from the equalization pump station may also be used to control the time required to empty this basin.

The flow from the diurnal equalization basin will be pumped directly to the existing 20-inch piping feeding the existing humus recirculation pump station. As a result, the existing primary effluent pump station will be abandoned.
1561
WEBB/Aqua Engineering 4 Innovative Engineering Solutions

2. EXISTING FACILITIES

2.1.DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING FACILITIES
Information presented below has been extracted from record drawings made available by the City, limited site visits conducted to date, and specific survey and geotechnical studies completed for this effort. Due to the age of record drawings and potential for changed field conditions it is anticipated that additional site visits will be required to verify existing conditions and further develop the design.

The current wastewater treatment plant was designed to treat an average day flow of 3.6 million gallons per day (MGD) and a peak flow of 7.2 MGD (MWH Plan Set 1999). The existing WWTP is a trickling filter plant with the following principal process/treatment components:
 Headworks (screening and grit removal)
 Primary Clarification
 Primary Effluent Pump Station
 Trickling Filters
 Humus Recirculation Pump Station
 Secondary Clarifiers
 Chlorine Disinfection
 Solids Handling Facilities
 Auxiliary facilities such as MCC buildings, chemical storage areas, detention pond(s), sludge drying beds, and others
A brief description of pertinent existing facilities is provided in the following paragraphs. These facilities are also identified in the facility site and yard piping drawings included in Appendix A.

2.1.1. Detention Pond
This earthen pond, constructed in 1999-2000, is principally used to accept storm water collected on site. Multiple pipes deliver storm water to the basin currently. The area currently occupied by this pond has been identified as the site of the proposed equalization basins.

Figure A. Existing Detention Pond
1562
City of Banning WWTP Equalization Basin Preliminary Engineering Report – Existing Facilities WEBB/Aqua Engineering 5 Innovative Engineering Solutions

2.1.2. Primary Clarifiers
Two concrete circular primary clarifiers are operated in the plant. Primary effluent from each clarifier is currently conveyed to the primary effluent pump station via 18-inch piping. In addition, original plans indicate that primary clarifier effluent boxes also allow for discharge of the primary effluent directly into an 18-inch bypass line. However, based on site visit observations, the current condition of the primary clarifier effluent boxes is such that will require modifications to ensure continued operability.

2.1.3. Primary Effluent Pump Station
The main function of this pump station is to deliver primary effluent to the recirculation pump station and ultimately trickling filters for additional treatment. This pump station currently receives primary effluent from the primary clarifiers and a 4-inch drain line from the trickling filter recirculation pump station. The pump station shows significant signs of age and its continued use would require substantial improvements.

Figure B. Existing Primary Effluent Pump Station

2.1.4. Humus Recirculation Pump Station
The existing Humus Recirculation Pump Station delivers a combined flow of primary effluent and humus return flows to trickling filters. Review of available record drawings show the current pump station consisting of a wet well with submersible pumps and a pump gallery with valves and piping combining the return and primary effluent flows. Figure C below shows a pump station schematic.

In addition, capacity of existing pumps is shown in Table 1.

Existing Recirculation Pumps
Pump
Flow
(gpm)
Head
(feet)
HP
Pump #1 (P-7) 1,800 N/A 15.0
Pump #2 (P-8) 1,800 N/A 15.0

1563
City of Banning WWTP Equalization Basin Preliminary Engineering Report – Existing Facilities WEBB/Aqua Engineering 6 Innovative Engineering Solutions Figure C. Recirculation Pump Station Schematic
This effort did not include an evaluation of the condition of the recirculation pump station. It is assumed that the current piping and recirculation pumps are adequate to accommodate the plant design flows.
1564
WEBB/Aqua Engineering 7 Innovative Engineering Solutions

3. PROPOSED FACILITIES AND MODIFICATIONS
The main objective of this project is to design and construct flow equalization facilities which will provide daily flow equalization and emergency storage for larger “wet flow” events sporadically experienced by the plant and typically associated with larger storm events and inflow and infiltration (I&I) in the collection system. The City has identified a suitable location on the existing plant site currently occupied by a storm water detention pond as the desired location of the future equalization facilities (See drawing 01C201 in Appendix A).

Following paragraphs describe the approach to sizing the two basins and establish the minimum volume and principal design criteria required for both applications.

3.1.EQUALIZATION BASIN SIZING
Equalization basin sizing for wastewater treatment plants is ideally based on measured plant influent flow data. Historic flow data provided by the City and used in this analysis is summarized below:
 Daily flow data for years 2011 through 2016 – This data was generally used to identify general flow patterns and identify impacts of rainfall events to daily inflow into the plant  Hourly flow data (Flowcharts – see example in Appendix B) for years 2010 through 2013* o (*some daily records missing)
o Spreadsheets with hourly flow data corresponding to significant wet weather flow events outside the 2010 to 2013 time period
This data was used to develop the diurnal curves as described in subsequent paragraphs.  Miscellaneous flow and rainfall (precipitation depth) data associated with wet weather events.

3.1.1. DIURNAL EQUALIZATION BASIN SIZING
Typical approach to sizing equalization basins involves a development of a diurnal curve. In general, diurnal curves are somewhat specific to a given collection system or treatment facility, although some variation based on seasons and specific events is usually observed. To develop a diurnal curve for this facility a representative sample of available hourly flow data was generated and processed. As a result, and as shown in Figure D, a representative “typical” diurnal curve (in red) was developed. For illustration purposes, a sample of diurnal curves used to develop the typical curve are also shown in gray.

Once the typical diurnal curve was defined, it was normalized based on the annual average plant flows to obtain a unit diurnal curve, which is a curve based on an average flow of 1 MGD. A unit diurnal curve allows us to apply the plant design flow rate (or any flow rate for that matter) for subsequent use in sizing of equalization facilities.
1565
City of Banning WWTP Equalization Basin Preliminary Engineering Report – Proposed Facilities WEBB/Aqua Engineering 8 Innovative Engineering Solutions Figure D. City of Banning WWTP Historic Average and Unit Diurnal Flow Curve With the unit diurnal curve established, the plant design flow of 3.6 MGD (ADF) was applied and a design diurnal curve was developed for actual sizing of the diurnal equalization basin. The sizing of the basin assumes that while the inflow into the equalization basin is represented by the diurnal curve flows, the equalization basin outflow is equal to the average plant design flow of 3.6 MGD. In other words, while the incoming flow varies significantly based on the time of the day, the outflow is constant (equalized) throughout the 24-hour period. An important aspect of equalization basin operation is the ability to empty the equalization basin daily and this is also a factor that impacts the sizing of the equalization basin.

Based on the design diurnal curve, outflow rate of 3.6 MGD, and the requirement to empty the equalization basin daily, a minimum equalization basin volume of 550,000 gallons is established.

However, standard industry practice recommends a 10% to 20% volume contingency to account for unforeseen changes in diurnal flows. In this case, it is suggested to increase this volume by 10% to 600,000 gallons due to the additional overflow volume that will be available in the wet weather flow storage basin.

Figure E illustrates the diurnal influent flows, ADF, and storage volume during a 72-hour period operation of the proposed equalization basin. The red line represents the plant influent flow. The green line represents the effluent flow from the diurnal equalization basin and the blue line represents the volume of storage at a given time.
0 0.2

0.4 0.6

0.8 1

1.2 1.4

1.6 0

0.5 1

1.5 2

2.5 3

3.5 4 City of Banning Average and Unit Diurnal Flow Curve Diurnal
Curve
Average
Diurnal
Curve
Unit
Diurnal
Curve
1566
City of Banning WWTP Equalization Basin Preliminary Engineering Report – Proposed Facilities WEBB/Aqua Engineering 9 Innovative Engineering Solutions Figure E. Flow vs Equalization Basin Storage Curve

3.2.DIURNAL EQUALIZATION BASIN STRUCTURE
The diurnal equalization basin will be a cast-in place concrete structure. The main reason for this is to minimize footprint and enhance maintenance and operability. Preliminary design parameters for the diurnal equalization basin structure are listed below:

Minimum volume of 600,000 gallons is required.

Operational liquid depth: Based on the overall plant hydraulics and desire to minimize earthwork (excavation and backfill) during construction, a maximum liquid depth of 18 feet is proposed for the diurnal equalization basin. As a result, a minimum area of 4,500 square feet (sf) is required.

Preliminary Diurnal Basin Configuration:
 Shape – Rectangular - with Two Sub-Basins
 Maximum liquid depth = 18 feet
 Wall height = 20 feet (2-foot min. freeboard)
 Nominal length = 100 feet
 Nominal width = 45 feet
 Preliminary wall width = 30 inches
 Preliminary slab thickness = 30 inches
 Typical min. floor slope = 0.5%
 Additional structural requirements:
 Low flow channel sloped at 1% min.
 Pump Intake Sump
A cursory review of an alternative circular-shaped equalization basin was completed as part of this effort. Based on the preliminary structural analysis and required volume, an estimated 150 cubic yards (CY) difference in concrete quantity required is approximated. While this difference in material quantity is significant, the labor requirements associated with circular tanks construction are typically higher thus minimizing potential cost savings. As a result, this potential option was not considered

0.00 1.00

2.00 3.00

4.00 5.00

6.00 0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000 12:00:00 AM 3:00:00 AM 6:00:00 AM 9:00:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 3:00:00 PM 6:00:00 PM 9:00:00 PM 12:00:00 AM 3:00:00 AM 6:00:00 AM 9:00:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 3:00:00 PM 6:00:00 PM 9:00:00 PM 12:00:00 AM 3:00:00 AM 6:00:00 AM 9:00:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 3:00:00 PM 6:00:00 PM 9:00:00 PM 12:00:00 AM Inflow vs. Outflow vs. Stored Volume Chart
Volume
Stored
(gallons)
Diurnal
Plant
Inflow,
MGD
Equalized
Outflow,
MGD
Day 1
1567
City of Banning WWTP Equalization Basin Preliminary Engineering Report – Proposed Facilities WEBB/Aqua Engineering 10 Innovative Engineering Solutions further.

3.3.DIURNAL EQUALIZATION BASIN OPERATION

3.3.1. Flow Control
The equalization basin will work in concert with the equalization basin pump station. Simple and robust operation is desired for equalization basin due to the nature of liquid handled and their continuous use. Drawings attached in Appendix A provide a preliminary basin layout and identify some of the proposed flow control features described below:

The primary effluent will be conveyed from the primary clarifier directly into the equalization pump station. Continuous plant influent flow metering will be provided, and a 15-day average plant influent flow rate will be used to determine the ADF for the period. This normalized flow rate which will control the operation of the equalization basin pumps. In some circumstances (based on liquid levels in the equalization basin) the pumps will have the ability to pump lower or higher rates.

The equalization basin pump station will be hydraulically connected to the diurnal equalization basin.

As a result, any influent flow that exceeds the established ADF will be stored in the diurnal equalization basin. Once the influent flow rate is less than the ADF, the equalization basin will start to empty.

In the scenario when the plant is experiencing wet weather flows and the diurnal equalization basin cannot provide the required attenuation and storage, an overflow will be provided that will convey liquid from the diurnal equalization basin into the wet weather storage basin. The overflow will be set at an elevation that is a few inches higher than the maximum operational liquid elevation for the diurnal equalization basin. This configuration ensures that the two basins are not hydraulically connected and that the wet weather storage basin only receives flows when the diurnal equalization basin is out of capacity.

The mechanism to empty the wet weather storage basin will consist of a single or multiple pipe intake(s) at a low spot constructed in the basin and a pipe(s) which will discharge back into the diurnal equalization basin. Flap gates or duckbill check valves (see Figure F below) will be installed at the end of the pipe (inside of the diurnal equalization basin). This configuration will simplify the flow controls (no operator input required) and ensure that the liquid in the diurnal equalization basin is removed prior to removal of liquid from the wet weather storage basin.

Figure F. Duckbill and Flap gates (Courtesy of Red Valve and Hydro-Gate)

3.3.2. Equalization Basin Maintenance
Maintenance of equalization basins is important. If proper maintenance is not performed odor and nuisance solids may be present. Design of the equalization basin and auxiliary facilities, and a number of passive and active features may greatly improve the operability and minimize maintenance 1568
City of Banning WWTP Equalization Basin Preliminary Engineering Report – Proposed Facilities WEBB/Aqua Engineering 11 Innovative Engineering Solutions requirements. For this project, several features may be implemented:
 Passive measures:
o Primary effluent flow will be directed into the pump station wet well (sump) – this will minimize the utilization of the equalization basing during low flows. In other words, if the influent flow is equal or less than the ADF, the main equalization basin volume will not be utilized.
o Use of sloped floor and low flow channels – this will ensure a level of self-cleaning as the level in the equalization basin is lowered.
o Corrosion resistant Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic (FRP) access ladders will be provided allowing for easier access into the basin.
o Protective coatings and non-corrosive materials of construction– ensure longevity and easier cleaning of concrete surfaces.
 Active measures:
o Automatic tipping buckets (Refer to Figure G) - provide an automated cleaning system based on relatively simple operational strategy. Once the equalization basin is empty or very close to empty solenoid valves located at utility water feed lines to each tipping bucket are opened and start filling the buckets. Once the liquid level in the buckets reaches a certain stage, buckets are “tipped” and the entire volume is discharged onto the sloped basin floor. The quantity and energy of the discharged liquid washes off the basin floor and portion of walls. The principal advantage of this system is that it does not require operator input.

However, some disadvantages of the system are noted below:
 Relatively high capital cost
 Specific structural requirements
 Require electrical and controls
 Relatively high utility water demand.

Figure G. Automatic Tipping Buckets (Courtesy of Ovivo) o Wash-down Monitor Hydrants are relatively simple systems typically consisting of 1569
City of Banning WWTP Equalization Basin Preliminary Engineering Report – Proposed Facilities WEBB/Aqua Engineering 12 Innovative Engineering Solutions a 2 to 4-inch hydrant with a spray nozzle. The spray nozzle usually can travel 360 degrees horizontally and 90 degrees vertically allowing for wide coverage.

Figure H. Typical Washdown Monitor Hydrant
Main advantage of this system is simplicity and relatively low capital cost. However, manual operation associated with this system increases the long-term operational costs.

Ability to implement any of the active measures is contingent on availability of utility water on site which will be further investigated during detailed design. Review of the available record drawings suggest that the utility water system at the plant has a capacity to deliver 300 gpm at a pressure of 185 feet. Additional review of the current utility water demand at the plant is required to establish if the current system capacity is sufficient for implementation of all or any of the active measures proposed.

3.3.3. Odor Control
No dedicated odor control is proposed for the initial construction project. The structural design of the equalization basin will assume and include provisions for a future aluminum cover and active odor control system.

3.4.EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP STATION
Main purpose of the equalization basin pump station is to provide a consistent flow to secondary treatment processes (recirculation pump station and trickling filters). As previously noted, the pumped flow will be equivalent to an average day plant influent flow normalized through a 15-day period. To provide operational flexibility and account for potential scenarios when the equalization basins are offline the pump station will also have a capacity to pump peak design flows.

The proposed equalization basin pump station will consist of three self-priming pumps (see Figure I).

The pump station wet well (sump) will be incorporated into the main diurnal equalization basin structure. The pumps and majority of suction and discharge piping will be constructed on a concrete pad adjacent to the diurnal equalization basin structure. It is recommended to provide a small metal awning right above the pumps for weather protection.
1570
City of Banning WWTP Equalization Basin Preliminary Engineering Report – Proposed Facilities WEBB/Aqua Engineering 13 Innovative Engineering Solutions Figure I. Self-Priming Pump (Courtesy of Gormann-Rupp)
Assuming the pumps will connect into the existing primary effluent pump station discharge piping (See attached drawings in Appendix A for approximate location), a total dynamic head (TDH) of 50 feet is estimated. Table 2 shows the basic design criteria for the equalization basin pumps:

Preliminary Equalization Pump Station Design Parameters Design parameter:

No. of Pumps 3 (2 Duty +1 Standby)
Flow capacity 2,600 gpm (each)
Estimated TDH 50 feet
Suction Lift 20 feet (+/-)
Drive Size 50 HP (VFD)
Solids handling capacity 3-inch diameter solids
Main pump discharge header will have a magmeter installed allowing for flow measurement and control of pumps.

Submersible pumps may be installed as an alternative to utilizing self-priming pumps in this application. Budgetary costs received for both types of pumps suggest that the capital cost difference is within 10% and cannot be considered significant at this stage of design. However, unless there is a strong preference, or if the detailed design favors or requires the use of submersible pumps, selfpriming pumps are recommended for this application. The main reason for this is that the self-priming pumps are a “dry” installation and allow for easy visual inspection and relatively easier maintenance.

3.5.WET WEATHER FLOW STORAGE BASIN
A secondary, wet weather flow storage basin (storage basin) will be constructed adjacent to the diurnal equalization basin structure. The main purpose of this storage basin is to provide an overflow storage (from diurnal equalization basin) for wet weather flows. 1571
City of Banning WWTP Equalization Basin Preliminary Engineering Report – Proposed Facilities WEBB/Aqua Engineering 14 Innovative Engineering Solutions

3.6.WET WEATHER FLOW STORAGE BASIN SIZING
In general, process of estimating the size of the wet weather storage basin included the following steps:
 Identification of wet weather days from available rainfall data  Correlation of “rain days” with available hourly flow data (for period of 2010 through 2013 and additional wet weather day hourly flow data provided)  Development of individual diurnal curves for wet weather days.  Comparison of wet weather days to design diurnal curve  Development of the design wet weather flow curve (see Figure J below) – increased by 20% (to account for variability in wet weather flow distribution).

Figure J. Wet Weather Flow Design Diurnal Curve
Once the design wet weather curve was established, it was “routed” through both the diurnal and wet weather flow basins. It is noted that a maximum 72-hour period was assumed to drain the storm drain basin. As a result, the routing was completed based on the assumptions that the wet weather flows (equivalent to design curve) have a 24-hour duration and that the equalization pump station will discharge at a slightly increased rate of 4.0 MGD (+/_) to secondary treatment processes during this time. As a result, a total equalization volume of 1.8 Million Gallons (MG) was determined as the minimum required volume for the wet weather storage flow basin. Figure K below illustrates the routing of wet weather flows through the storage basin and time required to empty the basin. 0 2
4 6
8 10
12 12:00:00 AM 1:00:00 AM 2:00:00 AM 3:00:00 AM 4:00:00 AM 5:00:00 AM 6:00:00 AM 7:00:00 AM 8:00:00 AM 9:00:00 AM 10:00:00 AM 11:00:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 1:00:00 PM 2:00:00 PM 3:00:00 PM 4:00:00 PM 5:00:00 PM 6:00:00 PM 7:00:00 PM 8:00:00 PM 9:00:00 PM 10:00:00 PM 11:00:00 PM Wet Weather Flow Design Diurnal Curve
Sample
Wet
Weather
Flow Data,
MGD
Design
Diurnal
Curve,
MGD
Design Wet
Weather
Diurnal
Curve,
MGD
1572
City of Banning WWTP Equalization Basin Preliminary Engineering Report – Proposed Facilities WEBB/Aqua Engineering 15 Innovative Engineering Solutions Figure K. Flow vs. Storage Curve for Combined Equalization and Wet Weather Storage Basin

3.7.WET WEATHER FLOW STORAGE BASIN STRUCTURE
Due to the frequency of wet weather events, it is anticipated that the wet weather storage basin will not be used daily. Therefore, the approach to designing this structure is slightly different compared to the diurnal equalization basin. Several options were evaluated:

Option1: Concrete tank – This option assumes that the entire wet weather storage basin structure is a cast-in-place concrete structure. Preliminary, the structure would have the following dimensions:
o Nominal Length = 100 feet
o Nominal Width = 130 feet
o Liquid Depth = 18 feet
o Wall Height = 20 feet
This option offers following advantages:
 Smaller footprint – higher liquid depth possible
 Potential for shared wall construction with diurnal equalization basin  Easier maintenance.

The main disadvantage of this option is the relatively high capital cost (Refer to Table 3 below).

Option 2: Lined basin (60 mil HDPE) with concrete floor - With this option, a 60 mil HDPE liner would be installed on the sides of the storage basin and a concrete cast-in place floor would be constructed.

Following footprint is estimated for this option:
 Bottom Nominal Length = 70 feet
 Bottom Nominal Width = 180 feet
 Side Slopes = 2.5H:1V
 Liquid Depth = 11 feet
 Minimum Freeboard = 3 feet
0 200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
0 50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000 12:00:00 AM 4:00:00 AM 8:00:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 4:00:00 PM 8:00:00 PM 12:00:00 AM 4:00:00 AM 8:00:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 4:00:00 PM 8:00:00 PM 12:00:00 AM 4:00:00 AM 8:00:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 4:00:00 PM 8:00:00 PM 12:00:00 AM 4:00:00 AM 8:00:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 4:00:00 PM 8:00:00 PM Inflow vs. Outflow vs. Storage Curve
Plant Inflow
(gallons)
Basin Outflow
(gallons)
Basin Storage
(gallons)
Wet Weather Flows Typical Diurnal Flows
1573
City of Banning WWTP Equalization Basin Preliminary Engineering Report – Proposed Facilities WEBB/Aqua Engineering 16 Innovative Engineering Solutions  Concrete floor thickness = 6 inches
The main advantages and disadvantages associated with this option are listed below:
 Advantages:
o Lower capital cost relative to Option 1
o Easier maintenance
 Disadvantages:
o Larger footprint
o Higher capital cost associated with concrete floor construction o High temperature and UV exposure impacts on liner – may require use of high temperature liner.

Option 3: Lined basin (60 mil HDPE) – Similar to Option 2 with the main difference being the use of a 60-mil HDPE liner for the basin floor. This option would have the same footprint and geometry as Option 2. While this option does not include a concrete basin floor, at a minimum a concrete sump for collection of return flows will be constructed. A summary of advantages and disadvantages associated with this option is provided below:
 Advantages:
o Least expensive capital cost option
 Disadvantages:
o Larger footprint
o Maintenance of the lined floor may be more difficult compared to concrete floor o High temperature and UV exposure impacts on liner – may require use of high temperature liner.

Storage Basin Options Relative Costs
Option Relative Construction Cost
(Concrete and/or Liner Cost only)
Option 1 $ 1.8 Million
Option 2 $300,000
Option 3 $180,000
Given the relatively infrequent use of the wet weather storage basin and the high cost of Option 1 it is recommended that the detailed design proceeds with Option #3. Layout of the storage basin is shown in the attached drawings in Appendix A.

3.8.WET WEATHER STORAGE BASIN OPERATION

3.8.1. Flow Control
The storage basin is expected to receive flows only in case when the flows into the plant exceed the capacity of the equalization basin. Overflow piping from the equalization basin will convey these additional flows directly into the storage basin. As previously noted, the return piping to equalization basin will be equipped with a flap gate that will prevent the return of flows (emptying of the storage basin) until the liquid level in the equalization basin is a few inches lower than the level in the storage basin. Ultimately, the entire operation is controlled by the equalization pumps and no operator input is required during this process.

3.8.2. Storage Basin Maintenance
Due to the size of the storage basin, when it comes to maintenance, the emphasis will be to design the basins with additional considerations to enhance the maintenance which may include:
1574
City of Banning WWTP Equalization Basin Preliminary Engineering Report – Proposed Facilities WEBB/Aqua Engineering 17 Innovative Engineering Solutions  Larger sloped concrete area to direct return flows and enhance maintenance.  Concrete ramp allowing for access to the basin floor
 Large opening bar screen at the return flow sump to prevent any large debris entering return piping
In addition, yard hydrants will be installed in the vicinity of the return flow sump to facilitate periodic washdown and cleaning.

3.8.3. Odor Control
No dedicated odor control is proposed for the initial construction project. Timely evacuation of liquid from the storage basin along with prompt cleaning after use will need to be implemented to minimize the potential to generate odors.

3.9. SITE WORK AND YARD PIPING
Site work will be limited to construction of proposed basins and installation of required process piping.

In general, the location and shape of the existing detention pond along with the proposed design will minimize excavation and backfill requirements. Based on the information presented in the Geotechnical report, the in-situ soils are suitable for use in construction of the proposed structures.

Consequently, minimum quantities of import fill material will be required. Paved areas disturbed by excavation and other construction activities will be replaced in kind. Specifically, paved areas disturbed by excavation required to install yard piping will be replaced. Gravel (road base) will be placed around the new equalization basin pump station diurnal equalization basin structure.

The proposed project will require installation of relatively large diameter process piping (18 to 24-inch diameter). The Geotechnical report indicates a severe potential for metal loss due to soil resistivity characteristics. As a result, the design will incorporate plastic piping (PVC, C-900) with coated and polyethylene wrapped ductile iron fittings.

3.10. ELECTRICAL

3.10.1. Proposed Electrical Design
As described in preceding sections, this project will incorporate an equalization and wet weather storage basins and three 50 HP VFD controlled equalization basin pumps to attenuate flow variations into the plant’s secondary treatment processes. Two of the pumps will be used as duty pumps and one will remain on standby.

Following the review of available record drawings, potential existing system deficiencies are identified and listed below:
 The motor control center (MCC) 3M located in the existing Boiler/MCC building has spare breakers that could potentially feed the equalization basin pumps VFDs. There are concerns however, that the MCC would be overloaded with additional loads generated by two duty 50HP pumps.
 The MCC utilizes a standby 200KW generator with a 350A breaker. The breaker size is nearly half of the trip rating of the MCC which is concerning if much of the existing plant equipment is needed during a power outage. It is required to evaluate the current MCC loads and verify size of the existing or recommend a new generator size.  There are also some concerns regarding availability of physical space needed for three (3) 50HP VFDs. A site visit is required to verify availability of space in this location.

Considering the overall design approach and potential deficiencies of the existing system, three 1575
City of Banning WWTP Equalization Basin Preliminary Engineering Report – Proposed Facilities WEBB/Aqua Engineering 18 Innovative Engineering Solutions preliminary electrical design options are identified. Each option offers its own advantages and disadvantages as described in section below. To properly evaluate these options, additional site visit(s) will be completed to evaluate and confirm the condition of the existing electrical system.

Option 1 – Provide a power feed from existing MCC 3M located in the MCC/Boiler building to pump VFD’s installed in a metal or pre-cast electrical enclosure (Refer to Figure L) adjacent to the equalization pumps. The small electrical enclosure will be air conditioned to maintain satisfactory conditions for VFD operation. The VFD’s would be fed from a single 300A breaker located in the MCC 3M. Ideally, existing electrical pullboxes located in the yard will be used to route the required conduits.

The main advantage of this option is that a single feeder from the MCC would reduce cost and mitigate problems of voltage drop associated with VFDs being located remotely from the pumps.

Figure L. Electrical Enclosure Options (precast concrete or metal panels) Option 2 – This option assumes that the new pump VFDs will be installed in or near MCC 3M and fed from the motor control center spare breakers. The main advantage of this option is that it would not require the construction of a new electrical enclosure near the equalization basin pumps. However, additional investigation is required to determine if sufficient space is available for the installation of VFDs. Furthermore, due to distance to pumps (more than 400 feet), frequency irregularities and voltage drops would require use of larger and more expensive cables that would offset some of the cost associated with the electrical enclosure.

Option 3 - This option is similar to option 1 as it requires VFD’s to be installed in a pre-cast electrical enclosure adjacent to the EQ Pumps. This option is presented with the assumption that there is insufficient electrical or physical space in MCC 3M for the new equipment. An existing and available breaker space in SWBD-MS would feed MCC-EQ from a 400A breaker. This would reduce the electrical load and harmonics on MCC-3M generated by the VFDs. Existing pullboxes and conduits in between SWBD-MS and the EQ electrical room would be utilized to route power. Further investigation of routing and conduit availability may be required with this option.

Regardless of the option selected, the existing standby generator will need to be evaluated.

Preliminary analysis indicates that a new, larger generator (300 KW) may be required for options 1 and 2. With option 3, a new (150KW) generator and ATS will likely need to be installed near the equalization basin Electrical room.

All three options are feasible however, option 3 appears to be the most economical, efficient and robust. Therefore, the current engineering design is based on option. 1576
City of Banning WWTP Equalization Basin Preliminary Engineering Report – Proposed Facilities WEBB/Aqua Engineering 19 Innovative Engineering Solutions

3.10.2. Controls and Instrumentation
PLC locations and hardware manufacturers are unknown at this time and will need to incorporate the proposed VFD I/O and controls for tipping buckets if utilized. VFDs will need discrete and analog inputs and outputs which may require new hardware to be installed if existing I/O cards are at or near capacity. Control conduits will run alongside power conduits from the existing PLC to the equalization pump station. Instrumentation, such as level and flow indicators will be used in the equalization basins and pump station and incorporated into the SCADA system to monitor and control performance and operation.

3.10.3. NFPA Classifications
Equalization basins storing raw or partially treated wastewater fall into one of the following categories:
 Open to Atmosphere (design condition):
o Class 1, Division 2 (within a 10-foot envelope)
 Enclosed (potential future condition) –
o No ventilation or less than 12 air exchanges per hour (ACH) – Class 1, Division 1 o Continuously ventilated at 12 ACH - Class 1, Division 2

3.11. SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
Majority of new facilities may be constructed with no or very little interruptions to existing plant operations. The basins, pump station, and the electrical enclosure may be constructed without disruptions to plant operations. Construction of yard piping and connections to existing process piping may require bypass pumping and relatively short disruptions. Electrical system modifications and potential standby generator change will require short duration disruptions. Alternative standby power sources will be provided during these activities to ensure continued operation of existing plant.

3.12. VALUE ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS
Based on the input form the City staff and engineering evaluation of potential cost reduction measures an alternative project scope approach as outlined below may be implemented.  Construct one half of the diurnal equalization basin – one half (300,000 gallons of storage volume) of the concrete diurnal equalization basin would be constructed. While this volume is borderline adequate at current plant flows, any potential excess liquid would be transferred to the wet weather storage basin. Alternatively, the excess flows could be handled by increasing the flow rate of the equalization basin pumps.  Remove active cleaning system (tipping buckets) – Tipping buckets would be replaced with monitor washdown hydrants. This approach will result in relatively significant capital cost savings.
 Remove concrete coating – While not ideal installation of protective coatings may be omitted or postponed until the construction of the second half of the diurnal equalization basin.

The cumulative effect on the project capital cost of these scope modifications is illustrated in Table 5.

It is noted that not all items listed above need to be removed from the scope. Each item listed above may be removed individually from the scope to decrease the capital cost if needed. 1577
City of Banning WWTP Equalization Basin Preliminary Engineering Report – Proposed Facilities WEBB/Aqua Engineering 20 Innovative Engineering Solutions

4. OPINION OF COST
Table 4 below presents the opinion of cost for the project as described in this report and outlined in the attached drawings. Table 5 illustrates the potential cost savings associated with the reduced project scope. As appropriate for this level of design development a 15% contingency is used.

Project Opinion of Cost
ITEM DESCRIPTION Quantity Unit Unit Cost COST

1.0 General Conditions, Overhead / Profit, Markup 15% percent 3,346,200 $ 502,000 $

2.0 Civil

2.1 Site Demolition 1 LS 10,000 $ 10,000 $

2.2 General Site Grading 1 LS 10,000 $ 10,000 $

2.3 Site Paving - Asphalt 3,000 SF 8 $ 24,000 $

2.4 Site Paving - Gravel 7,500 SF 6 $ 45,000 $

2.5 Misc. Improvements (PC Effluent Box, New and Existing SD Modifications) 1 LS 44,500 $ 44,500 $

2.5 Yard Piping (incl. valves and stand pipes/hydrants) 1 LS 254,000 $ 254,000 $

3.0 Diurnal Equalization Basin

3.1 Excavation 3,600 CY 8 $ 28,800 $

3.2 Backfill 1,600 CY 14 $ 22,400 $

3.3 Concrete 1,350 CY 1,100 $ 1,485,000 $

3.4 Process Piping and Gates 1 LS 54,450 $ 54,500 $

3.5 Tipping Buckets 4 EA 27,000 $ 108,000 $

3.6 Protective Coatings 7,900 SF 20 $ 158,000 $

3.7 Mechanical Installation 1 LS 50,000 $ 50,000 $

4.0 Wet Weather Storage Basin

4.1 Excavation 2,600 CY 8 $ 20,800 $

4.2 Backfill 4,000 CY 14 $ 56,000 $

4.3 Liner 40,200 SF 1.90 $ 76,400 $

4.4 Misc. Concrete Structures 1 LS 22,500 $ 22,500 $

4.5 Misc. Metals 1 LS 6,500 $ 6,500 $

5.0 Equalization Basin Pump Station

5.1 Concrete 23 CY 1,000 $ 23,000 $

5.2 Metal Awning 425 SF 110 $ 46,800 $

5.3 Pumps 1 LS 101,500 $ 101,500 $

5.4 Process piping and valves 1 LS 86,310 $ 86,300 $

5.5 Mechanical Installation 1 LS 45,000 $ 45,000 $

6.0 Electrical Building

6.1 Excavation 11 CY 8 $ 100 $

6.2 Backfill 6 CY 14 $ 100 $

6.3 Concrete 8 CY 1,000 $ 7,500 $

6.4 Pre-Engineered Metal Building 150 SF 200 $ 30,000 $

6.5 HVAC 1 LS 4,500 $ 4,500 $

7.0 Electrical/I&C

7.1 Electrical Gear and Installation (incl. new standby generator) 1 LS 525,000 $ 525,000 $ $ 3,848,200
$ 577,200
$ 4,425,400
Banning WWTP - Equalization Basin Project
Opinion of Cost (Base Bid)
Construction Cost Total
Project Subtotal
Contingency (15%)
1578
City of Banning WWTP Equalization Basin Preliminary Engineering Report – Proposed Facilities WEBB/Aqua Engineering 21 Innovative Engineering Solutions Alternate Project Opinion of Cost
ITEM DESCRIPTION Quantity Unit Unit Cost COST

1.0 General Conditions, Overhead / Profit, Markup 15% percent 2,365,000 $ 354,800 $

2.0 Civil

2.1 Site Demolition 1 LS 10,000 $ 10,000 $

2.2 General Site Grading 1 LS 10,000 $ 10,000 $

2.3 Site Paving - Asphalt 3,000 SF 8 $ 24,000 $

2.4 Site Paving - Gravel 10,000 SF 6 $ 60,000 $

2.5 Misc Improvements (PC Effluent Box, Influent Flow Measurement) 1 LS 44,500 $ 44,500 $

2.5 Yard Piping 1 LS 249,300 $ 249,300 $

3.0 Diurnal Equalization Basin

3.1 Excavation 2100 CY 8 $ 16,800 $

3.2 Backfill 950 CY 14 $ 13,300 $

3.3 Concrete 750 CY 1,100 $ 825,000 $

3.4 Process Piping and Gates 1 LS 49,600 $ 49,600 $

3.5 Washdown Monitor Hydrants 2 EA 5,500 $ 11,000 $

3.6 Mechanical Installation 1 LS 24,500 $ 24,500 $

4.0 Wet Weather Storage Basin

4.1 Excavation 2600 CY 8 $ 20,800 $

4.2 Backfill 4000 CY 14 $ 56,000 $

4.3 Liner 40,200 SF 1.90 $ 76,400 $

4.4 Misc. Concrete Structures 1 LS 22,500 $ 22,500 $

4.5 Misc. Metals 1 LS 6,500 $ 6,500 $

5.0 Equalization Basin Pump Station

5.1 Concrete 23 CY 1,000 $ 23,000 $

5.2 Metal Awning 425 SF 110 $ 46,800 $

5.3 Pumps 1 LS 101,500 $ 101,500 $

5.4 Process piping 1 LS 86,310 $ 86,300 $

5.5 Mechanical Installation 1 LS 45,000 $ 45,000 $

6.0 Electrical Building

6.1 Excavation 11 CY 8 $ 100 $

6.2 Backfill 6 CY 14 $ 100 $

6.3 Concrete 8 CY 1,000 $ 7,500 $

6.4 Pre-Engineered Metal Building 150 SF 200 $ 30,000 $

6.5 HVAC 1 LS 4,500 $ 4,500 $

7.0 Electrical/I&C

7.1 Electrical Gear and Installation (incl. new standby generator) 1 LS 500,000 $ 500,000 $ $ 2,719,800
$ 408,000
Construction Cost Total $ 3,127,800
Project Subtotal
Contingency (15%)
Banning WWTP - Equalization Basin Project
Opinion of Cost (BID Alternate)
1579

APPENDIX A
60% Design Drawings
1580
E N G I N E E R I N G 5325 S VALENTIA WAY, GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO, 80111 PHONE (720) 667-1250 WYOMING ARIZONA NEW MEXICO OKLAHOMA KANSAS NEBRASKA UTAH 70 70 70 70 70 76 76 25 25 25 MANCOS 491 160 491 160 550 550 160 84 160 160 160 285 285 550 50 50 285 350 160 287 160 287 287 385 40 40 24 385 36 34 36 385 6 385 138 85 34 34 287 36 163 40 34 40 85 285 40 CORTEZ DURANGO BAYFIELD 50 50 50 50 50 50 PAGOSA SPRINGS MANASSA SAN LUIS ALAMOSA SILVERTON OURAY CREEDEDEL NORTE SAGUACHE NATURITA MONTROSE CANAN CITY COLORADO CITY DOVE CREEK TELLURIDE TRINIDAD WALSENBURG SPRINGFIELD LA JUNTA ROCKY FORD LAS ANIMAS LAMAR HOLLY PUEBLA WEST PENROSEFOUNTAIN PUEBLO 24 24 24 DELTA CLIFTON GRANDFRUITA CARBONDALE BASALTLEADVILLE ASPEN MONTROSE CRESTED BUTTE BUENA VISTA GUNNISON SALIDA BRECKENRIDGE FAIRPLAY RIFLE MEEKER RANGELY KREMMLING EAGLE VAIL EDWARDS GLENWOOD SPRINGS SILBERTHRONE CRAIG HAYDEN SPRINGS WALDEN CHEYENE BURLINGTON LIMON YUMA WRAY HOLYOKE JULESBURG STERLING CRIPPLE CREEK SECURITY-WIDEFIELD MANITOU SPRINGS PARK MONUMENT FOREST SPRINGS CASTLE ROCK PARKER WELLINGTON WINDSORGREELEY BRUSH FT. MORGAN AURORA BENNETT BRIGHTON FORT LUMPTON FORT LOVELAND ESTES GRANBY BERTHOUD LONGMONT BOULDER BROOMFIELD ARVADA GOLDEN WINTER PARK LAKEWOOD LITTLETONDENVER JUNCTION STEAMBOAT COLLING WELLS WOODLAND BLACK COLORADO MONTE VISTA PARK 60% REVIEW ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 1581
G001 - COVER GENERAL DRAWING INDEX DWG# SHT# G002 - INDEX G003 - LEGEND, SYMBOLS, AND ABBREVIATIONS G004 - GENERAL NOTES G005 - STRUCTURAL NOTES - 1 G006 - STRUCTURAL NOTES - 2 G007 - STRUCTURAL NOTES - 3 G008 - PROCESS FLOW SCHEMATIC AND DESIGN CRITERIA 11S201 - STRUCTURAL PLAN - 2 11S401 - STRUCTURAL SECTION - 1 11S402 - STRUCTURAL SECTION - 2 11M201 - PUMP STATION MECHANICAL PLAN 11M401 - MECHANICAL SECTIONS - 1 - MECHANICAL SECTIONS - 2- MECHANICAL SECTIONS - 3 I001 - LEGEND I002 - SYMBOLS E001 - NOTES AND SYMBOLS E201 - SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN E202 - EQUALIZATION BASIN ELECTRICAL PLAN E501 - ONE LINE DIAGRAM - 1 E502 - ONE LINE DIAGRAM - 2 G009 - HYDRAULIC PROFILE 01C101 - OVERALL DEMOLITION/REMOVAL PLAN DEMOLITION 01C102 - DEMOLITION/REMOVAL PLAN/DETAILS 01C201 - OVERALL SITE PLAN CIVIL 01C202 - PARTIAL SITE PLAN - 1 01C203 - PARTIAL SITE PLAN - 2 01C501 - EQUALIZATION BASIN SECTIONS 01C601 - YARD PIPING PROFILE - 1 01C801 - YARD PIPING SCHEDULE AND NOTES 01C901 - PRIMARY CLARIFIER REHABILITATION 01C902 - CIVIL DETAILS EQUALIZATION BASIN 11S101 - STRUCTURAL PLAN 11M101 - OVERALL MECHANICAL PLAN 11S403 - STRUCTURAL SECTION - 3 11S901 - STRUCTURAL DETAILS 11M402 11M403 11M901 - MECHANICAL DETAILS - 1 ELECTRICAL BUILDING 60A201 - ARCHITECTURAL PLAN AND SECTION 60A301 - ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS - 1 60S101 - STRUCTURAL PLAN AND SECTION 60H201 - HVAC PLAN SCHEDULES 81A801 - DOOR AND GLASS SCHEDULE STANDARD DETAILS 91C901 - CIVIL - 1 91C902 - CIVIL - 2 92A901 - ARCHITECTURAL 93S901 - STRUCTURAL - 1 93S902 - STRUCTURAL - 2 93S903 - STRUCTURAL - 3 94M901 - MECHANICAL - 1 94M902 - MECHANICAL - 2 ELECTRICAL AND INSTRUMENTATION CONTROLS I101 - P&ID EQUALIZATION BASIN I102 - P&ID EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP STATION E901 - ELECTRICAL DETAILS - 1 E902 - ELECTRICAL DETAILS - 2 E903 - ELECTRICAL DETAILS - 3 81M801 - EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE 81A802 - PROTECTIVE COATINGS G002 INDEX

GENERAL
C:\USERS\DANIEL.SANDOVAL\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\000 GENERAL\000-00G002 INDEX.DWG 5/5/2021 - - - -
0 0
1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET OF

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

EQUALIZATION BASIN

ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153
1582

CATCH BASIN OVERHEAD POWER LINE STRUCTURE STREET LIGHT POLE & ANCHOR CLEAN OUT BOX OPCOB OP LEGEND PLAN VIEW GAS LINE MANHOLE WATER METER WATER VALVE FIRE HYDRANT SANITARY SEWER LINE ELECTRIC CABLE TELEPHONE CABLE CB SWV

H Y D WM SS
TE

G PROPERTY OR R/W LINE WATER LINE STORM DRAIN LINE BANK SLOPES SPOT ELEVATION CONTOUR LINE EASEMENT LINE FENCE WSD 4250.00 4250 EXISTING WV
S

H Y D WM SS
TE
GSDW PROPOSED SECTION AND DETAIL NOTES: NOTE: IF PLAN AND SECTION (OR DETAIL REFERENCE AND DETAIL) ARE SHOWN ON THE SAME DRAWING, THE DRAWING NUMBER IS REPLACED WITH A LINE. DETAIL IDENTIFICATION DETAIL NUMBER DETAIL NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER FROM WHICH DETAIL WAS TAKEN WHICH DETAIL APPEARS DETAIL SECTION AND DETAIL IDENTIFICATION SECTION SECTION LETTER SECTION LETTER DRAWING NUMBER ON WHICH SECTION APPEARS DRAWING NUMBER FROM WHICH SECTION WAS TAKEN SECTION IDENTIFICATION DRAWING NUMBER ON SEE DETAIL CONCRETE PAVING 550.00 TOA 4250 ASPHALT PAVING FLOW DIRECTION GRAVEL PAVING EDGE OF ASPHALT EDGE OF GRAVEL EDGE OF CONCRETE

X X X X
B
4 B
2 5
4 5
3 ESTCODE

ESTCODE

ESTCODE ARROW CONNECTING REFERENCE LINE TO ARROW SIDE MEMBER OF JOINT FIELD WELD SYMBOL WELD ALL AROUND SYMBOL TAIL T SPECIFICATION, PROCESS, OR OTHER REFERENCE BASIC WELD SYMBOL OR DETAIL REFERENCE OTHER SIDE ARROW SIDE B - BUTT JOINT C - CORNER JOINT T - T-JOINT BC - BUTT OR CORNER JOINT P - PARTIAL JOINT PENETRATION POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE

L LENGTH POC PPPLPI POWER POLE POINT ON CURVE PROPERTY LINE POINT OF INTERSECTION EDGE OF OIL EMBANKMENT DUCTILE IRON PIPE CLEAN OUT BOX DIST DISTANCE EMB EQUIP ENT EOENGR EQUIPMENT ENTRANCE ENGINEER ELEC ELEV EA ED/WDL DTH EACH ELECTRIC / ELECTRICAL ELEVATION EAST DRAIN LINE DISHWASHER DEKATHERMDDIA DIP DET CWCULV CUL DRAIN DIAMETER DETAIL CULINARY CLOCKWISE CULVERT CU YD CU FT CTR COR COL CONN COB CUBIC YARD CUBIC FEET CENTER CORNER CONNECT COLUMN NO OR # OFF REV OD PERF PCC PBR PVMT ORIG O-O OCNTS

NMPH MON OUTSIDE DIAMETER PERFORATED PHOTOBIOREACTOR OFFICE REVISION OUTSIDE TO OUTSIDE PAVEMENT ORIGINAL ON CENTER NOT TO SCALE MILES PER HOUR MONUMENT NUMBER NORTH MI MJ MISC MIN MKR MHMAX MATL MAINT LWL LTLICLINLSLB MECHANICAL JOINT MISCELLANEOUS MILE MINIMUM / MINUTE MANHOLE MARKER MAXIMUM MATERIAL MAINTENANCE LOW WATER LEVEL LAND SURVEYOR LINEAR / LINEAL LEFT LICENSE POUND @ AT FEN COR FENCE CORNER CONSTRUCTION JOINT CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CAST IRON PIPE CUBIC FEET PER SECOND CURB AND GUTTER CENTER TO CENTER COUNTER CLOCKWISE CATCH BASIN BENCH MARK BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT BLIND FLANGE BEGINNING / BEGIN APPROXIMATELY AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC BLK BLOCK CJ CIP CMP CL CFS C&G C-C CENTERLINE BTWN CCW CBBRG BSMT BOT BETWEEN BASEMENT BEARING BOTTOM BLD FLG BLM BMBLDG BKFL BKBDRY BEG BUILDING BACKFILL BACK BOUNDARY ADT AZBAL APPROX ALASPH BALANCE AZIMUTH AIR LINE ASPHALT INV JCT IRR INFO IJINHWL IDHYD HWY H&T HORIZ HDWL ISOLATION JOINT INFORMATION INVERT JUNCTION IRRIGATION INCH INSIDE DIAMETER HIGH WATER LEVEL HORIZONTAL HUB & TACK HYDRANT HIGHWAY HEADWALL GSP GYP GMGEN GAGALV

GFLG FRP FTG FTFLR FDN FIN FD GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE GAUGE GYPSUM GAS METER GALVANIZED GENERAL GAS FOUNDATION FLOOR DRAIN FLANGE FOOTING FEET FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PIPE/PANEL FLOOR FINISH ABBREVIATIONS SQ FT SQUARE FEET WITHOUT CROSS SECTION CROSSING WATER METER W/O X-SEC XING W/ WM WITH TOP TOP OF PIER VICTAULIC COUPLING TOP OF SLAB TOP OF WALL UTILITY WATER WEST / WATER VERTICAL POINT OF TANGENCY VERTICAL POINT OF CURVE VERTICAL POINT OF INTERSECTION VOLUME VERTICAL VERTICAL CURVE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS TELEPHONE POLE VCVERT VPI

W VPT VPC VIC VOL TOW UWUNO TSS TPTOS TOP OF FOOTING TEMPORARY TOP BACK CURB TANGENT TOWNSHIP STRUCTURE STANDARD STATION STAINLESS STEEL STREET STAINLESS STEEL SQUARE YARD TEMP STRUCT TBC TOF

TTAN STN STL SQ YD STD STA STL SSST STEEL PRC POINT OF REVERSE CURVE SQUARE SPECIFICATIONS SHEET SECTION CORNER STORM SEWER SCHEDULE SANITARY SOUTH / SLOPE RIGHT OF WAY RIGHT / ROUTE RAILROAD REVISION SPECS SEC COR SQSHT SDSCH R/WRTSAN S RRREV POTABLE WATER POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH REINFORCED REFERENCE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE RETURN ACTIVATED ALGAE QUANTITY POLYVINYL CHLORIDE POINT OF BEGINNING POINT OF TANGENCY PROPERTY PROJECT REINF REF RDRCP RAA QTY ROAD PROP PROJ PTPVC PWPOB PSI UG UNDERGROUND PSF POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT THD THREADED SKT SOCKET FG FINISHED GRADE FF FINISHED FLOOR PE PLANT EFFLUENT PD POND EFFLUENT TOC TOP OF CONCRETE TOA TOP OF ASPHALT EOA EDGE OF ASPHALT YH YARD HYDRANT FH FIRE HYDRANT HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYEURETHANE PIPE EOG EDGE OF GRAVEL TOG TOP OF GRAVEL DMH DRAINAGE MANHOLE EB ELECTRICAL BOX EMH ELECTRICAL MANHOLE LP LIGHT POLE NPW NON-POTABLE WATER PI PRIMARY INFLUENT RAS RETURN ACTIVATED SLUDGE WAS WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE ABUT ABUTMENT FE FIRE EXTINGUISHER ML MIXED LIQUOR THK THICK OSB ORIENTED STRAND BOARD MB MACHINE BOLT GLB GLUED LAMINATED BEAM HSS HOLLOW STRUCTURAL SECTION CLR CLEARANCE Ø DIAMETER AB ANCHOR BOLT EOS EDGE OF SHOULDER ALUM ALUMINUM UB UTILITY BOX CO CLEAN OUT CONC CONCRETE WO WEIR OVERFLOW TYP TYPICAL TKN TOTAL KIELDAHL NITROGEN BOD BLOCK DIG DIGESTER ADF AVERAGE DAILY FLOW BTU BRITISH THERMAL UNIT CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CFM CUBIC FEET PER MINUTE CONT CONTINUOUS DEG DEGREE DWG DRAWINGS DWV DRAIN WASTE VENT EL ELBOW EG EXISTING GROUND EF EACH FACE EOC EDGE OF CONCRETE EQ EQUAL ES EXIT SIGN FP FLOOR PENETRATION FW FLAT WASHER FPS FEET PER SECOND GAL GALLONS GPD GALLONS PER DAY GPH GALLONS PER HOUR GPM GALLONS PER MINUTE HDG HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED HB HOSE BIBB HP HORSE POWER HR HOUR HRT HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME HW HOT WATER IE INVERT ELEVATION LG LONG / LENGTH SP SPACING OR SPACE TOM TOP OF MANHOLE UV ULTRA VIOLET V VOLTS VTR VENT TO ROOF WC WATER CLOSET W/H WATER HEATER BT BIOTOWER IC INTERMEDIATE CLARIFIER SC SECONDARY CLARIFIER TF TRICKLING FILTER R RANGE / RADIUS DN DOWN PC POINT OF CURVATURE/PRIMARY CLARIFIER MBR MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR PV PLUG VALVE BV BUTTERFLY VALVE GV GATE VALVE CV CHECK VALVE APV AIR PINCH VALVE AD ANAEROBIC DIGESTER GT GRAVITY THICKENER /AEROBIC DIGESTER EST ESTIMATE EXEXC EXISTING EXCAVATION EW EACH WAY SHOWN OR SHOWN INCORRECTLY. SIBILITY FOR THE UTILITIES NOT THE ENGINEER BEARS NO RESPON- THE PROTECTION OF ALL UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OF THE CONTRACTOR ONLY. THE ON PLANS FOR THE CONVENIENCE EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN 1-800-662-4111 UNDERGROUND SERVICE (USA) UTILITIES. IT'S COSTLY AVOID CUTTING UNDERGROUND NOTICE: BLUE STAKES BEFORE YOU Dig Call MFR MANUFACTURER 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET OF

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN G003

LEGEND, SYMBOLS, AND ABBREVIATIONS

GENERAL
C:\USERS\DEREK.HYDE\BIM 360\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\000 GENERAL\000-00G003 LEGEND.DWG 12/11/2020 - - - - 0 ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153
1583
LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY. G004

GENERAL PROJECT NOTES

GENERAL
C:\USERS\DANIEL.SANDOVAL\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\000 GENERAL\000-00G004 GENERAL PROJECT NOTES.DWG 5/4/2021 - - - -
0 0
1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET OF

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

EQUALIZATION BASIN

ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153
1584
E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN KLEINFELDER Bright people, Right Solutions. 550 West C Street Suite : 1200 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel. (619) 831-4600 Kleinfelder.com G005 GENERAL NOTES - 1

STRUCTURAL
C:\CADD\20211860.001A - BANNING EQ BASIN\G005.DWG 4/20/2021 EN SML CN - 0
1585
E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN KLEINFELDER Bright people, Right Solutions. 550 West C Street Suite : 1200 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel. (619) 831-4600 Kleinfelder.com G006 GENERAL NOTES - 2

STRUCTURAL
C:\CADD\20211860.001A - BANNING EQ BASIN\G006.DWG 4/20/2021 EN SML CN - 0
1586
E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN KLEINFELDER Bright people, Right Solutions. 550 West C Street Suite : 1200 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel. (619) 831-4600 Kleinfelder.com G007 GENERAL NOTES - 3

STRUCTURAL
C:\CADD\20211860.001A - BANNING EQ BASIN\G007.DWG 4/20/2021 EN SML CN - 0
1587
PRIMARY CLARIFIER #2 PRIMARY CLARIFIER #1 TRICKLING FILTER #2 TRICKLING FILTER #1 DIURNAL FLOW EQ BASIN PRIMARY EFFLUENT PUMP STATION (ABANDONED) RECIRC. PUMPS FLOW SPLITTER RECIRC. PUMP STATION

PRIMARY INFLUENT
FLOW SPLITTER BOX WET WEATHER FLOW STORAGE BASIN EQ BASIN PUMP STATION TO SECONDARY CLARIFIERS 20" 18" 20" 18" DESIGN CRITERIA DESIGN FLOWS AVERAGE DAY FLOW 3.6 MGD PEAK HOUR FLOW 7.2 MGD DIURNAL FLOW EQUALIZATION BASIN QUANTITY 1 VOLUME 600,000 GALLONS LIQUID DEPTH 18'-0" EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMPS QUANTITY 3 (2 DUTY, 1 STANDBY) TYPE SELF-PRIMING FLOW 2,600 GPM (EACH) TDH 50' WET WEATHER STORAGE BASIN STORAGE VOLUME 1.5 MG MAX LIQUID DEPTH 11' 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 G008

AND DESIGN CRITERIA

PROCESS FLOW SCHEMATIC

GENERAL
C:\USERS\DANIEL.SANDOVAL\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\000 GENERAL\000-00G008 FLOW SCHEMATIC.DWG 5/4/2021 - - - -
0 0
1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET OF

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

EQUALIZATION BASIN

ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256
1588
2105 2110 2115 2120 2125 2130 TOW 2130.002124.00 2100 2105 2110 2115 2120 2125 2130 2100 2095 2095 HYDRAULIC PROFILE 2110 2115 2120 2125 2130 2110 2115 2120 2125 2130 2135 2135 2140 2140 2125.01 2133.50 HWL TO RECIRC. PUMP STATION 2147.00 2125.36 2124.91 2124.29 2123.22 WEIR 2124.49 WEIR 2123.04 TOW 2124.67 INV 2124.36 2126.39 2111.58 2119.00 2118.25 TO EQ BASIN 2126.50 2134.002136.00 2132.00 2132.70 HWL 2126.50 2144.16 TRICKLING FILTER RECIRCULATION PUMP STATION BAR SCREEN GRIT CHAMBER METER VAULT PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 2135 2135 2140 2140 2145 2150 2145 2150 TO RECIRCULATION PUMP STATION 2099.00 2114.00 TOW 2118.50 MIN WSEL 2098.00 EQUALIZATION BASIN WET WEATHER FLOW STORAGE MAX WSEL 2112.00 OVERFLOW TO WET WEATHER FLOW STORAGE RETURN FROM WET WEATHER FLOW STORAGE TOP OF BERM VARIES MIN 2115 2100.00 2101.00 2122.00 EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP STATION FROM EQ BASIN PUMP STATION MAX WSEL 2116.50 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 G009

HYDRAULIC PROFILE

GENERAL
C:\USERS\DANIEL.SANDOVAL\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\000 GENERAL\000-00G009 HYDRAULIC PROFILE.DWG 5/4/2021 - - - - 00 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET OF

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

EQUALIZATION BASIN
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS A S S O C I A T E S A L B E R T A. CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 1589
SP
SP
SP
SP
MH
MH MH
MH MH
MH
MH
X
X
X
X

X X X X X X X X
X

X X X X X X X X X X
X X
X

X X X X
X
X
X
X

X X X X X

X X X X

X X X X X X X X
X
X

X X X X X
X X
X
X X
X X
X
X
W
W
W
W
W
W
W NPW
NPW

NPW NPW NPW
NPW NPW PARTIAL SITE PLAN 1 SEE SHEET 01C202 PARTIAL SITE PLAN 2 SEE SHEET 01C203 SCALE: 1"=40'-0" OVERALL SITE PLAN Scale in Feet 0 40 80 2130
2125
2115
2120
2125
2130
2135
2135
2105
2105
2110
2110
2120
2115
2125
2120
2125
2125
2105
2110
2105
2110
2115
2120
2120
2130
2130
2125 OFFICE AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY TRICKLING FILTER #2 TRICKLING FILTER #1 FINAL CLARIFIER #1 FINAL CLARIFIER #2 RECIRC PUMP STATION SECONDARY SLUDGE PUMP STATION CONTROL HOUSE PRIMARY EFFLUENT PUMP STATION CHLORINE EQUIPMENT BUILDING CHLORINE CONTACT BASIN PRIMARY CLARIFIER #1 PRIMARY CLARIFIER #2 DIGESTER DIGESTERDIGESTER CONTROL HOUSE DIGESTER SLUDGE THICKENER CHEMICAL STORAGE PAD HEADWORKS BOILER AND MCC BUILDING GENERATOR SLUDGE DRYING BEDS DIURNAL FLOW EQUALIZATION BASIN WET WEATHER FLOW STORAGE BASIN 101 102 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 HORIZONTAL CONTROL PNT 101 102 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 NORTHING 2276893.14 2276871.04 2276840.10 2276732.60 2276808.85 2276783.85 2276835.07 2276815.07 2276789.07 2276769.07 2276835.07 2276815.07 2276789.07 2276769.07 2276842.44 2276827.44 EASTING 6378722.63 6378759.51 6379027.09 6379077.42 6379010.59 6379010.59 6379283.42 6379303.42 6379303.42 6379283.42 6379143.42 6379123.42 6379123.42 6379143.42 6379018.37 6379008.37 ELEVATION 2127.47 2127.30 2118.50 2118.50 2114.00 2114.00 2101.00 2101.10 2101.10 2101.00 2100.50 2100.40 2100.40 2100.50 2118.50 2118.50 DESCRIPTION BOILER BUILDING (CONTROL POINT) BOILER BUILDING (CONTROL POINT) DIURNAL FLOW EQUALIZATION BASIN -TOW DIURNAL FLOW EQUALIZATION BASIN -TOW PUMP STATION - FF PUMP STATION -FF STORAGE BASIN STORAGE BASIN STORAGE BASIN STORAGE BASIN STORAGE BASIN STORAGE BASIN STORAGE BASIN STORAGE BASIN ELECTRICAL BUILDING - FF ELECTRICAL BUILDING -FF 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET OF

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 01C201

OVERALL SITE PLAN
CIVIL
C:\USERS\KENNETH.BAETZ\BIM 360\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\001 SITE CIVIL\011-01C201 OVERALL SITE PLAN.DWG 5/5/2021 - DCH BP - 0 LEGEND EXISTING STRUCTURE ABANDONED STRUCTURE NEW STRUCTURE MODIFIED STRUCTURE ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS A S S O C I A T E S A L B E R T A. CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 1590

X X X X X X X X X X X X X
X
X
X

X X X X X X W W W W W
W

W W W W W W W W NPW

NPW NPW
NPW NPW NPW NPW NPW SCALE: 1"=20'-0" PARTIAL SITE PLAN 1 Scale in Feet 0 20 40 TRICKLING FILTER #2 TRICKLING FILTER #1 FINAL CLARIFIER #1 FINAL CLARIFIER #2 RECIRC PUMP STATION SECONDARY SLUDGE PUMP STATION CONTROL HOUSE PRIMARY EFFLUENT PUMP STATION CHLORINE EQUIPMENT BUILDING CHLORINE CONTACT BASIN PRIMARY CLARIFIER #1 PRIMARY CLARIFIER #2 DIGESTER DIGESTER DIGESTER CONTROL HOUSE DIGESTER SLUDGE THICKENER CHEMICAL STORAGE PAD HEADWORKSBOILER AND MCC BUILDING GENERATOR DIURNAL EQUALIZATION BASIN NEW 20" PE NEW 18" LINE - 18" MPF - 16" MPF - 18" MPF - 2"CS - 18" MPF - 20" MPF - 18" MPF - 4" DRAIN - 18"- - 1" WATER CONNECT TO EXISTING 20" PE LINE CAP - 6" SLUDGE - 16" OVERFLOW ELECTRICAL VAULT ELECTRICAL VAULT WEIR EL: 2123.04 WEIR EL: 2123.05 SEWER MANHOLE SEWER MANHOLE ELECTRICAL VAULT MODIFY EFFLUENT BOX SEE SHEET 01C901 (TYP OF 2) 2 01C601 1 01C601 1 01C601 3 01C601 4 01C801 6 01C801 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE 1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET OF

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 01C202
PARTIAL SITE PLAN 1
CIVIL
C:\USERS\KENNETH.BAETZ\BIM 360\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\001 SITE CIVIL\011-01C202 PARTIAL SITE PLAN.DWG 5/5/2021 - DCH BP - 0 LEGEND EXISTING STRUCTURE ABANDONED STRUCTURE NEW STRUCTURE MODIFIED STRUCTURE ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS A S S O C I A T E S A L B E R T A. CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 1591

X X X X X W W W W W W W W W W W NPW NPW NPW NPW NPW NPW NPW NPW NPW NPW NPW NPW NPW

NPW NPW NPW
NPW SCALE: 1"=20'-0" PARTIAL SITE PLAN 2 Scale in Feet 0 20 40 2115 2120
2120
2125
2125
2105
2110 2105 2110 2110
2105
2115 2120 212001C501 A B
01C501 EXISTING CONCRETE STRUCTURE (TO BE REMOVED) EXISTING HEADWALL (MAINTAIN AS OVERFLOW) R=55.00 (TYP) 2.5:1 2.5:1 2.5:1 2.5:1 SLOPE BASIN DRAIN SEE DETAIL EXISTING CONCRETE STRUCTURE 36" RCP SDR 30" CMP - 30" RCP SDR 18" - MPF 16" - MPF 18" - MPF2" - CS DIURNAL EQUALIZATION BASIN (VOL = 600,000 GALLONS) REMOVE EXISTING HEADWALL, ADD PORTION OF RCP 2110
2103
2110 DIGESTER DIGESTER DIGESTER CONTROL HOUSE PRIMARY CLARIFIER #2 PRIMARY CLARIFIER #1 CHLORINE CONTACT BASIN SEWER MANHOLE SEWER MANHOLE ELECTRICAL VAULT ELECTRICAL VAULT 180.00'

66.00' WET WEATHER FLOW STORAGE BASIN (1.5 MG STORAGE) SLUDGE DRYING BEDS 3:1 2115
2115
2115
2110 C
01C501 LINER ANCHOR TRENCH SEE DETAIL EL: 2105.01 EL: 2104.89 IE: 2103.52 EL: 2104.48 TOP OF PIPE 1 01C902 - 01C902 PIPE PENETRATION SEE DETAIL 2 01C902 ELECTRICAL BUILDING FF: 2118.50 SEE SHEET 60A201 PUMP STATION FF: 2114.00 SEE SHEET 11S201 TOW: 2118.50 CATCH BASIN RIM: 2113.00 CATCH BASIN SEE DETAIL (TYP) RIM: 2112.75 C104 91C901 2113 21142113 CATCH BASIN (TYP)RIM: 2113.00 3 01C601 3 01C601 1 01C601 1 01C601 4 01C801 5 01C801 EXTEND PIPE CONSTRUCT OVERFLOW BOX REMOVE HEADWALL CHECK VALVE 6 01C801 STAND PIPE SEE DETAIL -- BURIED GATE VAVLE SEE DETAIL C127 91C902 NOTE 1 NOTE 1 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE 1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET OF

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 01C203
PARTIAL SITE PLAN 2
CIVIL
C:\USERS\KENNETH.BAETZ\BIM 360\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\001 SITE CIVIL\011-01C203 PARTIAL SITE PLAN.DWG 5/5/2021 - DCH BP - 0 ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS A S S O C I A T E S A L B E R T A. CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 LEGEND EXISTING STRUCTURE ABANDON NEW STRUCTURE MODIFIED STRUCTURE NOTES: 1- BID ALTERNATE 1592
2096 2100 2104 2108 2112 2116 2120 2096 2100 2104 2108 2112 2116 2120 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 3+87 2096 2100 2104 2108 2112 2116 2120 2096 2100 2104 2108 2112 2116 2120 0+00 1+00 2+00 2+20 2096 2100 2104 2108 2112 2116 2120 2096 2100 2104 2108 2112 2116 2120 0+00 1+00 2+00 2+20 SECTION A- HORIZ SCALE: 1"=20'-0" SECTION B- VERT SCALE: 1"=4'-0" HORIZ SCALE: 1"=20'-0" VERT SCALE: 1"=4'-0" 1 2.5 1 2.5 1 2.5 1 2.5 SLOPE 60 MIL HDPE LINER (TYP)MAX WSEL 2112.00 MIN FREEBOARD 3' MAX WSEL 2112.00 60 MIL HDPE LINER EXISTING GRADE 18" RETURN TO EQ BASIN OVERFLOW FROM EQ BASIN IE 2104.25 LINER TRENCH SEE DETAIL (TYP) EXISTING GRADE LINER TRENCH SEE DETAIL (TYP) 8.00' (TYP) 1 3 HORIZ SCALE: 1"=20'-0" SECTION C- VERT SCALE: 1"=4'-0" 8.00' (TYP) 1 2.5 1 3 1 2.5 1 3 8.00' (TYP) LINER TRENCH SEE DETAIL (TYP) MAX WSEL 2112.00 60 MIL HDPE LINER (TYP) 1 01C902 1 01C902 1 01C902 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE 1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET OF

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 01C501

SECTIONS
CIVIL
C:\USERS\DEREK.HYDE\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\001 SITE CIVIL\011-01C501 SECTIONS.DWG 4/20/2021 - - - - 0 ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 1593
2108 2112 2116 2120 2124 2108 2112 2116 2120 2124 0+00 1+00 2+00 2+47 2108 2112 2116 2120 2124 2128 2132 2108 2112 2116 2120 2124 2128 2132 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 4+81 HORIZ SCALE: 1"=20'-0" SECTION 1 - 2
- HORIZ SCALE: 1"=20'-0" SECTION 3
- VERT SCALE: 1"=4'-0" HORIZ SCALE: 1"=4'-0"
PRIMARY CLARIFIER #2
STA:0+00.01 ELEV:2109.17

22.50° BEND
STA:0+06.04 ELEV:2109.17
18" MPF STA:0+08.91 ELEV:2116.84

22.50° BEND
STA:0+20.98 ELEV:2109.17 WYE
STA:0+42.34 ELEV:2109.17
20"x18" REDUCER
STA:0+49.47 ELEV:2109.17

22.50° BEND
STA:0+95.10 ELEV:2109.17

22.50° BEND
STA:1+94.83 ELEV:2109.17
90° BEND
STA:2+40.22 ELEV:2109.17 PUMP STATION
STA:2+47.39 ELEV:2109.17

PIPE CONNECTION
STA:0+00.00 ELEV:2108.25
18" MPF STA:0+53.34 ELEV:2115.00
45° BEND
STA:1+25.42 ELEV:2108.06
45° BEND
STA:1+81.28 ELEV:2108.25
16" MPF STA:2+71.27 ELEV:2115.00
18" MPF STA:2+74.73 ELEV:2115.00
45° BEND
STA:3+38.03 ELEV:2108.25
45° BEND
STA:4+24.15 ELEV:2108.25

PUMP STATION
STA:4+80.60 ELEV:2108.25
0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET OF

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153

ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 01C601

PIPE PROFILE
CIVIL
C:\USERS\DEREK.HYDE\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\001 SITE CIVIL\001-01C601 PIPE PROFILES.DWG 4/28/2021 - DCH BP - 0
1594
NOTES: 1- INSTALLATION TYPES: BUR - BURIED PIPE OUT - OUTSIDE EXPOSED IN - INSIDE EXPOSED 2- PIPE RESTRAINT REQUIREMENTS: BURIED DIP: FITTINGS - MEGALUG SERIES 1100, OR EQUAL JOINTS - MEGALUG SERIES 1700, OR EQUAL
COUPLINGS - MEGALUG SERIES 3800, OR EQUAL
BURIED PVC (C-900, 905):

FITTINGS - MEGALUG SERIES 2000 OR 2200, OR EQUAL
JOINTS - MEGALUG SERIES 1900 OR 2800, OR EQUAL WELDED STEEL PIPE: FULLY WELDED JOINTS OR FLANGED WHERE SHOWN EXPOSED DIP AND PVC (C-900, 905): FLANGED 3- ALL PIPING TESTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATION SECTION 330505. AL - AIR LOW HEAD AH - AIR HIGH HEAD HH - HYDROSTATIC HIGH HEAD HL - HYDROSTATIC LOW HEAD G - GRAVITY 4- EXPOSED DIP SHALL BE COATED AND LABELED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATION SECTIONS 098000 AND 220553. 5- UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL POTABLE AND NON-POTABLE WATER LINES SHALL BE BURIED MINIMUM 36" BELOW FINISHED GROUND. 6- FOR YARD PIPING NOT SPECIFICALLY LISTED IN THIS SCHEDULE, USE SIMILAR PIPE MATERIALS AND TESTING STANDARDS TO MATCH PIPES OF SIMILAR SERVICE THAT ARE LISTED IN THIS SCHEDULE. ABBREVIATION KEY PI PRIMARY INFLUENT PE PRIMARY EFFLUENT PD PLANT DRAIN NPW NON-POTABLE WATER SD STORM DRAINYARD PIPING SCHEDULE PIPE NO. SIZE SERVICE SYMBOL INSTALLATION (See Note 1) MATERIAL REMARKS PRESSURE, PSI (See Note 3) PROFILE SHEET Operating Test 1 18" PRIMARY CLARIFIER EFFLUENT PE BUR DIP & C900 NOTE 2,4 0-10 20, HL 01C601 2 20" PRIMARY CLARIFIER EFFLUENT PE BUR DIP & C900 NOTE 2,4 0-10 20, HL 01C601 3 18" EQ BASIN PRIMARY EFFLUENT PE BUR DIP & C900 NOTE 2,4 0-30 50, HH 01C601 4 6",4" NON-POTABLE WATER NPW BUR HDPE DR-11 NOTE 5 0-100 150, HH N/A 5 18" RETURN FROM WET WEATHER STORAGE BASIN PE BUR DIP & C900 NOTE 2,4 0-10 20, HL N/A 6 8",30" STORM DRAIN SD BUR DIP & C900 NOTE 2, 4 0-5 10, G N/A 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE 1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET OF

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153

ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 01C801

YARD PIPING SCHEDULE AND NOTES
CIVIL
C:\USERS\DEREK.HYDE\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\001 SITE CIVIL\011-01C801 YARD PIPING SCHEDULE AND NOTES.DWG 4/28/2021 - - - - 0 1595
EXISTING 18" AC TO RECIRCULATION PIT EXISTING 16" AC PRIMARY CLARIFIER BYPASS TYPICAL OF PRIMARY CLARIFIER #1 AND #2 SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" REHAB PLAN Scale in Feet 0 2 4 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING GATE SCALE: NTS PHOTO 1- SCALE: NTS PHOTO 2- REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING GATE CUT AND CAP EXISTING 18" PIPE SEE NOTE 1 5'-0" G-10201 20" C-900 SEE SHEET 01C202 FOR PIPE CONTINUATION REMOVE EXISTING 16" AC PIPE AS NEEDED (SEE SHEET 01C202) REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING GATE NOTES: 1- POWER WASH AND SEAL CONCRETE SURFACE. 2- DETAIL IS TYPICAL OF TWO PRIMARY CLARIFIERS. 3- LOCATIONS OF EXISTING EQUIPMENT AND PIPING ARE BASED ON PLANS PROVIDED TO THE ENGINEER AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON AS COMPLETE AND ACCURATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PRIOR TO REMOVAL AND CONSTRUCTION. 4- PRIOR TO START OF WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT TO ENGINEER FOR REVIEW/ DEMOLITION PLAN IDENTIFYING DEMOLITION/ REMOVAL ACTIVITIES AND THEIR SEQUENCE. G-10202 MJ SLEEVE 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE 1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET OF

CITY OF BANNING
2242 E. CHARLES ST, BANNING, CA
EQUALIZATION BASIN 01C901

PRIMARY CLARIFIER REHABILITATION
CIVIL
C:\USERS\DANIEL.SANDOVAL\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\001 SITE CIVIL\001-01C901 PRIMARY CLARIFIER REHAB PLAN.DWG 5/4/2021 JRL BDP EIT - 0 E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153
1596
SCALE: NTS 2- TYPICAL PIPE PENETRATION THROUGH LINER HDPE GEOMEMBRANE POND LINER HDPE PIPE BOOT HDPE POND LINER EXTRUSION WELDED TO HDPE "T-LOCK" EMBED STRIP - "T-LOCK" STRIP TO BE CAST-IN-PLACE BY OTHERS CONTINUOUS AROUND SLAB PERIMETER PREPARED SURFACE PIPE THROUGH POND SIDE SLOPE TO BE "STUBBED-IN" MIN 6" PRIOR TO LINER INSTALLATION (BY OTHERS) MIN 5" THICK CONCRETE SLAB LxW TO BE DETERMINED BASED ON PIPE SIZE AND SLOPE ANGLE HDPE PIPE BOOT SS BADNING STRAP BUCKLE AND PULL TIGHT POLYURETHANE CAULKING PIPE 1/8" THICK x 1" BUTYL RUBBER GASKET 3" MIN. EXTRUSION WELD BOOT FLANGE TO LINER 2'-0" SCALE: NTS 1- TYPICAL POND LINER ANCHOR TRENCH EXTEND POND LINER INTO AND ACROSS BOTTOM OF TRENCH CONTINOUS 1' WIDE x 2' DEEP TRENCH AROUND TOP PERIMETER OF POND PREPARED, SMOOTH SUBGRADE (NOTE 1) GEOMEMBRANE POND LINER 1' MIN 2'-0" COMPACTED BACKFILL (BY OTHERS) RADIUS ALL SHARP CORNERS AT TOP INSIDE EDGE OF TRENCH 2.5 1 2.5 1 NOTES: 1- 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE 1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153

ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 01C902

DETAILS
CIVIL
C:\USERS\DANIEL.SANDOVAL\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\002 STRUCTURES\EQ BASIN\01C902 - EQ BASIN DETAILS.DWG 5/4/2021 - - - - 0 1597
STRUCTURAL PLAN 11S101
PLAN

STRUCTURAL
C:\CADD\20211860.001A - BANNING EQ BASIN\11S101.DWG 5/5/2021 - - - - 0 E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN KLEINFELDER Bright people, Right Solutions. 550 West C Street Suite : 1200 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel. (619) 831-4600 Kleinfelder.com 1598
11S201

PUMP STATION PLAN

STRUCTURAL
C:\CADD\20211860.001A - BANNING EQ BASIN\11S201.DWG 5/5/2021 - - - - 0 E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN KLEINFELDER Bright people, Right Solutions. 550 West C Street Suite : 1200 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel. (619) 831-4600 Kleinfelder.com STRUCTURAL PLAN 11S403
1599
SECTION 11S401
SECTION 1

STRUCTURAL
C:\CADD\20211860.001A - BANNING EQ BASIN\11S401-EQ SECTION.DWG 4/20/2021 EN SML CN - 0 E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN KLEINFELDER Bright people, Right Solutions. 550 West C Street Suite : 1200 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel. (619) 831-4600 Kleinfelder.com 1600
SECTION 11S402
SECTION 2

STRUCTURAL
C:\CADD\20211860.001A - BANNING EQ BASIN\11S402-EQ SECTION.DWG 4/20/2021 EN SML CN - 0 E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN KLEINFELDER Bright people, Right Solutions. 550 West C Street Suite : 1200 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel. (619) 831-4600 Kleinfelder.com 1601
11S403
SECTION 3

STRUCTURAL
C:\CADD\20211860.001A - BANNING EQ BASIN\11S403-PS SECTION.DWG 4/20/2021 EN SML CN - 0 E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN KLEINFELDER Bright people, Right Solutions. 550 West C Street Suite : 1200 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel. (619) 831-4600 Kleinfelder.com SECTION 1602
E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN KLEINFELDER Bright people, Right Solutions. 550 West C Street Suite : 1200 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel. (619) 831-4600 Kleinfelder.com 11S901

DETAILS

STRUCTURAL
C:\CADD\20211860.001A - BANNING EQ BASIN\11S901.DWG 4/20/2021 - - - - 0
1603
H Y SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0" OVERALL MECHANICAL PLAN 0 Scale in Feet 4 8 20" OVERFLOW TO WET WEATHER FLOW STORAGE BASIN 18" RETURN FROM WET WEATHER FLOW STORAGE BASIN 18" TO RECIRCULATION PUMP STATION 20" FROM PRIMARY CLARIFIERS TIPPING BUCKETS (TYP OF 2) (OPTIONAL) 24"Ø OVERFLOW TO BASIN#2 W/FLARE 20"Ø OVERFLOW W/FLARE SEE 01C203 FOR TIE-IN LOCATION 2" HDPE NPW 6" HDPE NPW HV11011 HV11012 4" HDPE NPW 4" SS PIPE (TYP) EQUALIZATION BASIN #2 ME-11101 ME-11102 11M401 A C 11M403 EQUALIZATION BASIN #1 18" DIP (SEE NOTE 1) SEE NOTE 1 ME-11112 (SEE NOTE 1) ME-11111 (SEE NOTE 1) 20" OVERFLOW TO WET WEATHER FLOW STORAGE BASIN 11M402 B G-11102 (SEE NOTE 1) SEE SHEET 11M201 BURIED GATE VALVE SEE DETAIL C127 91C902 NOTES: 1- BID ALTERNATE. 5'-0" 20" MJ SLEEVE 11M101
PLAN

OVERALL MECHANICAL
C:\USERS\BRETT.PRATT\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\002 STRUCTURES\EQ BASIN\11M101 - OVERALL MECH PLAN.DWG 5/5/2021 - - - - 0 E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE 1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

EQUALIZATION BASIN

ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 1604
H
Y SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" PUMP STATION MECHANICAL PLAN
0 Scale in Feet
2 4 M-11210 HV-11201 CV-11201 HV-11202 CV-11202 HV-11203 CV-11203 P-11201 P-11202 P-11203 20" FROM PRIMARY CLARIFIERS YARD HYDRANT SEE DETAIL C129 91C902 C 11M403 2" HDPE NPW COMBINATION AIR/ VAC VALVE SEE DETAIL M106 94M901 ROUTE DISCHARGE TO EQUALIZATION BASIN 10" DIP (TYP) G-11101 18" TO RECIRCULATION PUMP STATION SEE NOTE 2 NOTES: 1- PROVIDE PIPE SUPPORTS AS SHOWN IN DETAILS M132 AND M144 IN SHEETS 94M901 AND 94M902 IN LOCATIONS MARKED WITH AN "X" OR AS REQUIRED. 2- BID ALTERNATE. 11M402 B
X X X ADJUSTABLE PIPE SUPPORT SEE DETAIL M132 94M901 11M201 PLAN

PUMP STATION MECHANICAL
C:\USERS\BRETT.PRATT\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\002 STRUCTURES\EQ BASIN\11M201 - MECH PLAN.DWG 5/5/2021 - - - - 0 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010
PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153
0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

EQUALIZATION BASIN

ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 1605
SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" SECTION A 11M101 TOW 2118.50 LINK SEAL SEE DETAIL (TYP) S131 93S903 24" DIP G-11101 18" DIP (SEE NOTE 1) 24" DIP FLARE MAX WS 2116.50 18" RETURN FROM WET WEATHER FLOW STORAGE BASIN (SEE NOTE 1) EQUALIZATION BASIN #2 2'-0"
2'-9 3/4"
3'-3 3/4"
1'-9"
2'-1 1/4"
GROUT
GROUT EQUALIZATION BASIN #1 PIPE ANCHOR SEE DETAIL (TYP) M133 94M901 G-11102 (SEE NOTE 1) NOTES: 1- BID ALTERNATE. 11M401

SECTION

MECHANICAL
C:\USERS\BRETT.PRATT\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\002 STRUCTURES\EQ BASIN\11M401 - MECH SECTION.DWG 5/5/2021 - - - - 0 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE 1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS A S S O C I A T E S A L B E R T A. CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 1606
SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" SECTION B 11M101 0 Scale in Feet 2 4 FF 2114.00 TOW 2118.50 12 1 CV-11202 HV-11203 P-11202 10" DIP ME-11112 4" SS PIPE 18" HEADER (3) LINK SEAL SEE DETAIL S131 93S903 20" FROM PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 20" DIP 10" DIP FLARE GROUT PAD (TYP) 20" MJ SLEEVE SS STRUT SUPPORT SEE DETAIL (TYP) M143 94M902 2'-10 5/16"
5'-6 9/32" PIPE ANCHOR SEE DETAIL (TYP) M133 94M901 TOW 2118.50 FV-11101 THRU FV-11112 HV-11101 THRU HV-11112 ME-11101 THRU SS STRUT SUPPORT SEE DETAIL (TYP) (SIMILAR) M143 94M902 INSTALL AND ANCHOR EQUIPMENT AS PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS 4" HDPE NPW 4" HDPE TO SS TRANSITION CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE SEE DETAIL M143 94M902 SEE NOTE 1 NOTES: 1- CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE STRUT SUPPORT SYSTEM SIZED TO MOUNT VALVE AND TIPPING BUCKET CONTROL PANEL. SEE ELECTRICAL SHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. SS SUPPORT BRACKETS TO BE SUPPLIED BY EQUIPMENT SUPPLIER (TYP) SS STRUT SUPPORT SEE DETAIL (TYP) M132 94M901 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE 1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN 11M402

SECTION

MECHANICAL
C:\USERS\KENNETH.BAETZ\BIM 360\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\002 STRUCTURES\EQ BASIN\11M402 - MECH SECTION.DWG 5/5/2021 - - - - 0 E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS A S S O C I A T E S A L B E R T A. CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 1607
18" C-905 TO RECIRCULATION PUMP STATION SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" SECTION C 11M101 Scale in Feet 0 2 4 FG M-11210 MFV-11211 FF 2114.00 HV-11212 ADJUSTABLE PIPE SUPPORT SEE DETAIL (TYP) M132 94M901 P-11203 P-11202 P-11201 GROUT PAD (TYP) COMBINATION AIR/ VAC VALVE SEE DETAIL M106 94M901 ROUTE DISCHARGE TO EQUALIZATION BASIN 11M403

SECTION

MECHANICAL
C:\USERS\BRETT.PRATT\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\002 STRUCTURES\EQ BASIN\11M403 - PUMP STATION SECTION.DWG 5/5/2021 - - - - 0 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010
PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153
0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS A S S O C I A T E S A L B E R T A. CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 1608
CONCRETE SLAB SEE DETAIL (TYP) C107 91C901 SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" ARCHITECTURAL PLAN 0 Scale in Feet
2 4 SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" SECTION A
- 0 Scale in Feet
2 4 SELF-FRAMED INSULATED METAL BUILDING 12 1 1/2 EQUIPMENT PAD SEE DETAIL SELF-FRAMED INSULATED METAL BUILDING R-13 INSULATION R-19 INSULATION 1 15'-0" A/C UNIT
1'-10"
10'-0"
10'-0"
5'-0" 5'-0"
METAL WALL LINER (TYP) S161
-
A 11'-7" EQUIPMENT PAD SEE DETAIL S161
- EXIT SIGN SEE DETAIL A150 92A901 FIRE EXTINGUISHER SEE DETAIL A132 92A901 FIRE EXTINGUISHER SIGN SEE DETAIL A147 92A901 60A201

PLAN AND SECTION

ELECTRICAL BUILDING ARCHITECTURAL
C:\USERS\DANIEL.SANDOVAL\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\002 STRUCTURES\EQ BASIN\60A201 ARCHITECTURAL PLAN.DWG 5/4/2021 - - - -
0 0
1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET OF

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153

ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256
1609
12 1 1/2 SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" EAST ELEVATION 0 Scale in Feet 2 4 CONCRETE LANDING SEE DETAIL 12 1 1/2 SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" NORTH ELEVATION 0 Scale in Feet 2 4 SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" WEST ELEVATION 0 Scale in Feet 2 4 SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION 0 Scale in Feet 2 4 10'-0"x 15'-0" SELF-FRAMED INSULATED BUILDING (COLOR BY OWNER) (SEE SPECIFICATION 054200 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION) WALL PACK C122 91C901 FG A/C UNIT 1 FG CONCRETE LANDING SEE DETAIL C122 91C901 CONCRETE LANDING SEE DETAIL C122 91C901 8'-0"
10'-0" 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET OF

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN 60A301

ELEVATIONS

ELECTRICAL BUILDING ARCHITECTURAL
C:\USERS\DANIEL.SANDOVAL\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\002 STRUCTURES\EQ BASIN\60A201 ARCHITECTURAL PLAN.DWG 5/4/2021 - - - - 0 E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 1610
60S101

STRUCTURAL PLAN AND SECTION

ELECTRICAL BUILDING
C:\CADD\20211860.001A - BANNING EQ BASIN\60S101 ELECT BLDG.DWG 4/20/2021 - - - - 0 E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN KLEINFELDER Bright people, Right Solutions. 550 West C Street Suite : 1200 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel. (619) 831-4600 Kleinfelder.com STRUCTURAL PLAN - SECTION
1611
SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" HVAC PLAN
0 Scale in Feet
2 4 SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" SECTION A
- 0 Scale in Feet
2 4
1 1'-10"
5'-0" H-10111 H-10111 H-10112 AIR INTAKE
A
- 11'-7"
5'-0" EQUIPMENT PAD
0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET OF

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS A S S O C I A T E S A L B E R T A. CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 60H201

PLAN AND SECTION

ELECTRICAL BUILDING HVAC
C:\USERS\DANIEL.SANDOVAL\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\002 STRUCTURES\EQ BASIN\60H201 HVAC PLAN AND SECTION.DWG 5/4/2021 - - - - 0
1612
1 TYPE DOOR SCHEDULE 0 Scale in Feet 2 4 GLASS SCHEDULE SYMBOL GLASS TYPE G1 TEMPERED CLEAR INSULATING GLASS NOTES: 1- DIMENSIONS OF DOORS MAY VARY ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER. SYMBOL SIZE HINGE CLOSER LOCKSET KICKPLATE DOOR STOP THRESHOLDS WEATHERSTRIPPING DESCRIPTION INSIDE K OUTSIDE JAMB LH STRIKE JAMB LH HINGE K INSIDE OUTSIDE JAMB LH STRIKE JAMB LH HINGE K INSIDE JAMB RH STRIKE JAMB RH HINGE (KEY SIDE) (KEY SIDE) OUTSIDE (KEY SIDE) LH Lock RHRB Lock LHRB Lock KINSIDE OUTSIDE JAMB RH HINGE JAMB LH HINGE (KEY SIDE) LH Lock INACTIVE LH Active RH ASTRAGAL K INSIDE OUTSIDE JAMB RH HINGE JAMB LH HINGE (KEY SIDE) RH Lock INACTIVE RH Active LH ASTRAGAL K INSIDE OUTSIDE JAMB LH HINGE JAMB RH HINGE(KEY SIDE) LHRB Lock INACTIVE LHRB Active LH ASTRAGAL KINSIDE OUTSIDE JAMB RH HINGE JAMB LH HINGE (KEY SIDE) RHRB Lock INACTIVE RHRB Active RH ASTRAGAL B C D E F G H K INSIDE OUTSIDE JAMB RH STRIKE JAMB RH HINGE (KEY SIDE) RH Lock A D 2'-0" 2" TYP 6'-4" 4"
TYP
7'-4"
8"
TYP
2'-6" 3'-10"
7'-0" 6" TYP 3'-0" DOUBLE METAL W/ WINDOW METAL FRAME G1 6'-0" A 6'-0"x7'-0" NO YALE 5401 LN 619 693 NO YES NO NO GALVANIZED METAL INSULATED DOOR W/ WINDOW TYPE A K = KEY SIDE OF THE ACTIVE DOOR HINGE AND SWING SCHEDULESCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" DOOR SCHEDULE RIGHT HAND DOOR (SWING IN) RIGHT HAND FRAME LEFT HAND DOOR (SWING IN) LEFT HAND FRAME RIGHT HAND REVERSE BEVEL DOOR (SWING OUT) LEFT HAND FRAME LEFT HAND REVERSE BEVEL DOOR (SWING OUT) RIGHT HAND FRAME PAIR OF DOOR-RHRB ACTIVE (SWING OUT) DOUBLE DOOR FRAME-LH ACTIVE PAIR OF DOOR-LHRB ACTIVE (SWING OUT) DOUBLE DOOR FRAME-RH ACTIVE PAIR OF DOOR-RH ACTIVE (SWING IN) DOUBLE DOOR FRAME-RH ACTIVE PAIR OF DOOR-LH ACTIVE (SWING IN) DOUBLE DOOR FRAME-LH ACTIVE 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE 1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 81A801

SCHEDULES
DOOR AND GLASS SCHEDULE 0 - - - -
5/4/2021 C:\USERS\DANIEL.SANDOVAL\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\980 SCHEDULES\81A801 - DOOR AND GLASS SCHEDULE.DWG ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 1613
PROTECTIVE COATINGS SCHEDULE AREA ITEM COATING GENERAL PIPING NON-SUBMERGED EXTERIOR STEEL PIPING, VALVES, FITTINGS, AND APPURTENANCES COATING SYSTEM 102 INTERIOR STEEL PIPING, VALVES, FITTINGS, AND APPURTENANCES COATING SYSTEM 103 SUBMERGED STEEL PIPING, VALVES, FITTINGS, AND APPURTENANCES COATING SYSTEM 104 SUBMERGED AND NON-SUBMERGED STEEL PIPNG, VALVES, FITTINGS AND APPURTENANCES - MODERATE H2S EXPOSURE COATING SYSTEM 106 BURIED STEEL PIPING AND FITTINGS COATING SYSTEM 107 BURIED DUCTILE IRON OR CAST IRON PIPE, VALVES, FITTINGS, AND APPURTENANCES COATING SYSTEM 211 NON-SUBMERGED EXTERIOR DUCTILE IRON OR CAST IRON PIPE, VALVES, FITTINGS, AND APPURTENANCES COATING SYSTEM 212 INTERIOR DUCTILE IRON OR CAST IRON PIPE, VALVES, FITTINGS, AND APPURTENANCES COATING SYSTEM 213 SUBMERGED EXTERIOR DUCTILE IRON OR CAST IRON PIPE, VALVES, FITTINGS, AND APPURTENANCES COATING SYSTEM 213 EXPOSED EXTERIOR PVC OR CPVC PIPING, VALVES, FITTINGS, AND APPURTENANCES COATING SYSTEM 221 EXPOSED INTERIOR PVC OR CPVC PIPING, VALVES, FITTINGS, AND APPURTENANCES NO COATING REQUIRED EXPOSED INTERIOR/EXTERIOR GALVANIZED STEEL PIPING NO COATING REQUIRED STAINLESS STEEL PIPE NO COATING REQUIRED PIPE BOLLARDS COATING SYSTEM 102 MISC. METALS STRUCTURAL STEEL (NON HDG) COATING SYSTEM 101 ALUMINUM PLANK OR GRATING NO COATING REQUIRED STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM NO COATING UNLESS EMBEDED OR IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE - SYSTEM 203 ALUMINUM HANDRAIL FACTORY FINISH - CLEAR ANODIC ALUMINUM STAIRS NO COATING UNLESS EMBEDED OR IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE - SYSTEM 203 PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NO COATING REQUIRED NO COATING REQUIRED COATING SYSTEM 307 COATING SYSTEM 307 FACTORY FINISH - TOUCH UP/REPAIR PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS FACTORY FINISH - TOUCH UP/REPAIR PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS NO COATING UNLESS EMBEDED OR IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE - SYSTEM 203 EQUALIZATION BASIN NO COATING REQUIRED NO COATING REQUIRED NO COATING REQUIRED NO COATING REQUIRED NO COATING REQUIRED STAINLESS STEEL FACTORY FINISH -NO COATING REQUIRED FACTORY FINISH - TOUCH UP/REPAIR PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS NO COATING UNLESS EMBEDED OR IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE - SYSTEM 203 EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP STATION NO COATING REQUIRED NO COATING REQUIRED NO COATING REQUIRED NO COATING REQUIRED COATING SYSTEM 312 HDG FACTORY FINISH - TOUCH-UP/REPAIR PER MFG RECOMMENDATIONS 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE 1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153

ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 81A802

FINISH AND PROTECTIVE COATING

SCHEDULES
C:\USERS\DANIEL.SANDOVAL\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\980 SCHEDULES\81A802 - FINISH AND PROTECTIVE COATING SCHEDULE.DWG 5/4/2021 - - - - 0 1614
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE ME# LOCATION ITEM SERVICE HP (KW) REMARKS ME-11101 EQUALIZATION BASIN 1 TIPPING BUCKET EQUALIZATION BASIN CLEANING N/A GRANDE MODEL ACU-TIP MODEL 20 ME-11102 EQUALIZATION BASIN 1 TIPPING BUCKET EQUALIZATION BASIN CLEANING N/A GRANDE MODEL ACU-TIP MODEL 20 ME-11111 EQUALIZIATION BASIN 2 TIPPING BUCKET EQUALIZATION BASIN CLEANING N/A GRANDE MODEL ACU-TIP MODEL 20 ME-11112 EQUALIZATION BASIN 2 TIPPING BUCKET EQUALIZATION BASIN CLEANING N/A GRANDE MODEL ACU-TIP MODEL 20 METER SCHEDULE M# LOCATION SERVICE TYPE SIZE REMARKS M-11210 EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP STATION EQUALIZED FLOW METERING MAGMETER 18" SEE INSTRUMENTATION SCHEDULE HVAC SCHEDULE H# LOCATION SERVICE TYPE V / HP (KW) CAPACITY/SIZE REMARKS H-10111 ELECTRICAL BUILDING VENTILATION AND HEATING SUPPLY AIR CONDITIONING 230/209V 24,000 BTUH BARD FUSION-TEC PLC AIR CONDITIONER WR35BP H-10112 ELECTRICAL BUILDING AIR SUPPLY CONTROL REGISTER BARD FUSION-TEC SUPPLY GRILLE SGR-5W PUMP SCHEDULE P# LOCATION SERVICE TYPE HP (KW) FLOW TDH MIN. EFFICIENCY @ DESIGN POINT REMARKS P-11201 EQUALIZATION BASIN EQUALIZIED FLOW PUMPING SELF-PRIMING CENTRIFUGAL 50.0 1,267 - 2,517 GPM 56-70 FT 75% GORMAN RUPP MODEL T10A3-B P-11202 EQUALIZATION BASIN EQUALIZIED FLOW PUMPING SELF-PRIMING CENTRIFUGAL 50.0 1,267 - 2,517 GPM 56-70 FT 75% GORMAN RUPP MODEL T10A3-B P-11203 EQUALIZATION BASIN EQUALIZIED FLOW PUMPING SELF-PRIMING CENTRIFUGAL 50.0 1,267 - 2,517 GPM 56-70 FT 75% GORMAN RUPP MODEL T10A3-B VALVE SCHEDULE V# LOCATION SERVICE TYPE SIZE MATERIAL CONNECTION ACTUATOR REMARKS HV-11010 YARD NON-POTABLE WATER ISOLATION GATE 4" CI MJXMJ NUT MUELLER A-3261 RESILIENT WEDGE OR EQUAL (BURIED SERVICE) HV-11101 EQUALIZATION BASIN TIPPING BUCKET NPW ISOLATION BALL 3" SS THD LV APOLLO SERIES 76-100 OR EQUAL FV-11101 EQUALIZATION BASIN TIPPING BUCKET FLOW CONTROL SOLENOID 3" SS THD ELEC SUPPLIED WITH TIPPING BUCKETS HV-11102 EQUALIZATION BASIN TIPPING BUCKET NPW ISOLATION BALL 3" SS THD LV APOLLO SERIES 76-100 OR EQUAL FV-11102 EQUALIZATION BASIN TIPPING BUCKET FLOW CONTROL SOLENOID 3" SS THD ELEC SUPPLIED WITH TIPPING BUCKETS HV-11111 EQUALIZATION BASIN TIPPING BUCKET NPW ISOLATION BALL 3" SS THD LV APOLLO SERIES 76-100 OR EQUAL FV-11111 EQUALIZATION BASIN TIPPING BUCKET FLOW CONTROL SOLENOID 3" SS THD ELEC SUPPLIED WITH TIPPING BUCKETS HV-11112 EQUALIZATION BASIN TIPPING BUCKET NPW ISOLATION BALL 3" SS THD LV APOLLO SERIES 76-100 OR EQUAL FV-11112 EQUALIZATION BASIN TIPPING BUCKET FLOW CONTROL SOLENOID 3" SS THD ELEC SUPPLIED WITH TIPPING BUCKETS HV-11011 EQUALIZATION BASIN NON-POTABLE WATER ISOLATION GATE 4" DIP HDPE X HDPE NUT MUELLER RESILIENT SEATED WEDGE GATE VALVE OR EQUAL FOR BURIED SERVICE HV-11012 EQUALIZATION BASIN NON-POTABLE WATER ISOLATION GATE 6" DIP HDPE X HDPE NUT MUELLER RESILIENT SEATED WEDGE GATE VALVE OR EQUAL FOR BURIED SERVICE CV-11201 EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP STATION EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP #1 FLOW CONTROL CHECK 10" CI FL X FL N/A VALMATIC SWING FLEX SERIES 500A OR EQUAL HV-11201 EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP STATION EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP #1 DISCHARGE ISOLATION PLUG 10" CI FL X FL WHL VALMATIC 100% PORT ECCENTRIC PLUG VALVE OR EQUAL CV-11202 EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP STATION EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP #2 FLOW CONTROL CHECK 10" CI FL X FL WHL VALMATIC SWING FLEX SERIES 500A OR EQUAL HV-11202 EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP STATION EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP #1 DISCHARGE ISOLATION PLUG 10" CI FL X FL WHL VALMATIC 100% PORT ECCENTRIC PLUG VALVE OR EQUAL CV-11203 EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP STATION EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP #3 FLOW CONTROL CHECK 10" CI FL X FL WHL VALMATIC SWING FLEX SERIES 500A OR EQUAL HV-11203 EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP STATION EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP #1 DISCHARGE ISOLATION PLUG 10" CI FL X FL WHL VALMATIC 100% PORT ECCENTRIC PLUG VALVE OR EQUAL MFV-11211 EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP STATION EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP HEADER AIR RELEIF VALVE COMBINATION 4" DI THD - VALMATIC SERIES 802A OR EQUAL HV-11212 EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP STATION EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP HEADER DISCHARGE ISOLATION PLUG 18" CI FL X FL WHL VALMATIC 100% PORT ECCENTRIC PLUG VALVE OR EQUAL GATE SCHEDULE G# LOCATION SERVICE TYPE OPENING (H x W OR DIA)* MATERIAL OPERATOR FRAME SEATING HEAD (FT) UNSEATING HEAD (FT) REMARKS G-10201 PRIMARY CLARIFIER #1 EFFLUENT BOX ISOLATION UPWARD OPENING SLIDE GATE 48" X 36" SS CRANK WALL MOUNTED 3.00000 5.00000 GOLDEN HARVEST MODEL GH-60 OR EQUAL G-10202 PRIMARY CLARIFIER #2 EFFLUENT BOX ISOLATION UPWARD OPENING SLIDE GATE 48" X 36" SS CRANK WALL MOUNTED 3.00000 5.00000 GOLDEN HARVEST MODEL GH-60 OR EQUAL G-11101 EQUALIZATION BASIN #1 FLOW CONTROL CIRCULAR FLAP GATE 18" SS N/A N/A N/A N/A GOLDEN HARVEST MODEL GH-39P OR EQUAL G-11102 EQUALIZATION BASIN #2 FLOW CONTROL CIRCULAR FLAP GATE 18" SS N/A N/A N/A N/A GOLDEN HARVEST MODEL GH-39P OR EQUAL 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE 1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153

ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 81M801

MECHANICAL, PUMP, GATE, METER, VALVE, HVAC

SCHEDULES
C:\USERS\DANIEL.SANDOVAL\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\980 SCHEDULES\81M801 - SCHEDULES.DWG 5/5/2021 - - - - 0 1615
SCALE: NTS TYPICAL TRENCH C102 - PIPE
1'-0"
MIN
4"
MIN
2'-0"
MIN OD + 24" MIN UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE SELECT BEDDING COMPACTED TO 95% MAX DRY DENSITY PER GEOTECH REPORT LOCATOR TAPE (METALLIC FOR NON-METALLIC UTILITIES) NATIVE BACKFILL COMPACTED TO 85% OF MAX DRY DENSITY PER GEOTECH REPORT SLOPE LAYBACK PER OSHA REQUIREMENTS TOP SOIL (IF REQUIRED) RESTORE TO ORIGINAL GRADE RESTORE TO ORIGINAL GRADE TRENCH IN PAVED AREAS TRENCH IN UNPAVED AREAS SAWCUT EDGE BITUMINOUS SURFACE COURSE TYPE 2 UNTREATED BASE COURSE COMPACTED TO 95% MAX DRY DENSITY PER GEOTECH REPORT NATIVE OR IMPORTED BACKFILL COMPACTED TO 95% MAX DRY DENSITY PER GEOTECH REPORT SELECT NATIVE OR IMPORTED BEDDING COMPACTED TO 95% MAX DRY DENSITY PER GEOTECH REPORT SCALE: NTS CATCH BASIN C104 - 24"x24" CAST OR PRECAST CATCH BASIN DRAIN PIPE SIZE PER PLAN SUBGRADE BASE COURSE BITUMINOUS SURFACE 24" GRATE TRAFFIC RATED NON-BITUMINOUS SURFACE DRAIN PIPE SIZE AND INVERT VARIES SEE PLAN LINK SEAL SEE DEAIL S331 - 6"
MIN
VARIES
VARIES SCALE: NTS CATCH BASIN C105 - 24"x24" CAST OR PRECAST CATCH BASIN SUBGRADE BASE COURSE BITUMINOUS SURFACE 24" GRATE TRAFFIC RATED NON-BITUMINOUS SURFACE DRAIN PIPE SIZE AND INVERT VARIES SEE PLAN LINK SEAL SEE DEAIL S331 - 6"
MIN
VARIES SCALE: NTS TYPE 'A' CURB C106 - NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS EVERY 10 FEET AND EXPANSION JOINTS EVERY 40 FEET. 6"
1'-0" 6" 6 3/4" R=3/4" SCALE: NTS SIDEWALK C107 - NOTES: 1- CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS EVERY 5 FEET AND EXPANSION JOINTS EVERY 20 FEET. 2- SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE 2% CROSS SLOPE AWAY FROM STRUCTURE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3- IF ADJACENT TO STRUCTURE, SIDEWALK SHALL BE DOWELED TO STRUCTURE WITH #4 BARS AT 18" OC. DOWELS SHALL BE 12" LONG WITH 4" OF EMBEDMENT. 4- IF ADJACENT TO BUILDING, EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN SIDEWALK CONCRETE AND STRUCTURE WITH SEALANT BEING PLACED ALONG TOP EDGE OF JOINT. PER PLAN 12"
4" BASE COURSE COMPACT TO 95% OF MAX DENSITY IF NOT SPECIFIED SCALE: NTS GRAVEL SWALE C115 - MIRAFI COOX GEO-FABRIC 12" THICK GRAVEL SHALL BE PLACED SUCH THAT NOT TO DAMAGE LINER EXTEND LINER 3" PAST GRAVEL FINISH GRADE (TYP) WIDTH PER PLANS DEPTH
PER PLANS SCALE: NTS AC CURB C118 - 3'-0" 4"
2"
VARIES
1:1 1:1 FLOW LINE ASPHALT / CONCRETE LEVEL LINE EDGE OF SHOULDER SCALE: NTS PIPE BOLLARD C120 - 3'-0" 2'-0" 12" 4'-0" CONCRETE FOOTING FINISH GRADE 8"Ø GALV STEEL PIPE 1/4" THICK FILL SOLID WITH CONCRETE AND MOUND AT TOP SCALE: NTS CONCRETE LANDING C122 - 8" 8" STRUCTURAL FILL #4 BAR @ 12" OC EW
4" DRILL & EPOXY #4 DOWEL 20" LONG W/4" EMBEDMENT 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE 1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS A S S O C I A T E S A L B E R T A. CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 91C901

DETAILS
CIVIL
C:\USERS\DANIEL.SANDOVAL\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\990 DETAILS\91C901 & 91C902 -CIVIL DETAILS.DWG 4/26/2021 - - - - 0 1616
SCALE: NTS BURIED GATE VALVE C127 -
4" 2'-0" 2'x2' CONCRETE PAD CRUSHED ROCK PROVIDE STEM EXTENSION WHEN VALVE BURY DEPTH EXCEEDS 8 FEET VALVE BOX 150# GATE VALVE. BURIED SERVICE W/GEAR OPERATOR. EPOXY COAT EXTERIOR. NOTES: 1- PROVIDE PROTECTIVE COATING TO EXTERIOR SURFACE OF VALVE BODY AND PROVIDE STAINLESS STEEL NUTS AND BOLTS. 2- VALVE BOX LID SHALL BE LABELED ACCORDING TO SERVICE. SCALE: NTS CLEANOUT TO GRADE C131 - NOTES: 1- IF IN UNIMPROVED AREA TOP SHALL BE 6" ABOVE GRADE. 2- SEE PLAN FOR STATION AND INVERT ELEVATION. PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE OF THE SAME MATERIAL AS THE MAIN LINE SEWER. 3- SET COVER AND CONCRETE COLLAR 1/4" TO 1/2" BELOW GRADE IN PAVED ASPHALT CONCRETE AREAS AND FLUSH WITH FINISH GRADE ELSEWHERE. 12" MIN 2" CONCRETE BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE/ CONCRETE PAVEMENT CAST IRON FRAME AND COVER LANDSCAPING 18" 1/2" CAST IRON CAP WITH FINGER HOLE IN CENTER PLUG 6" MIN SCALE: NTS PRESSURE CLEANOUT C132 - 18" 6" 4" PVC DRAIN, 12" LONG FILL WITH GRAVEL THRUST BLOCK #4 @ 10" OC EACH WAY 6" 24" 6" STANDARD CI FRAME & 1/4" CHECKERED PLATE IN UNIMPROVED AREAS. TRAFFIC TYPE (D & L SUPPLY H-1880 OR EQUAL IN ROADWAYS 1" PLUG VALVE W/THREADED NIPPLE & HALF COUPLINGS WELDED TO BLIND FLANGE & 1" THREADED NIPPLE FOR HOSE CONNECTION SCALE: NTS BURIED BALL VALVE C133 - 2'-0" SQUARE GROUND 4" 2'x2' CONCRETE PAD (OPTIONAL, SEE PLANS) VALVE BOX TYLER TY-SPUN ADJUSTABLE W/ 5-1/4" LID SERIES 7100 WITH O-RING (OR EQUAL) BALL OR GATE VALVE MATCH SIZE INDICATED ON DRAWINGS (TYP) 2'-0" MIN TRANSITION METAL PIPE SIZE PER PLAN 3'-0" MIN
BURY DEPTH NOTE: 1- LAST 3'-0" OF BURIED PIPING SHALL BE GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE, SCH 40 COATED OR WRAPPED PER SPECIFICATIONS. SCALE: NTS YARD HYDRANT C129 - 4"
2'-6" 3'-6"
MIN BURY DEPTH FLOOR PIPE SLEEVE GROUND CONCRETE PROTECTIVE BASE 1'-8" SQUARE NON-FREEZE HOSE BIBB WATTS HY-800 (OR EQUAL) WRAP PIPING VALVE HOUSING IPS CONNECTOR WRAPPED GALV ELBOW OR TEE NOTES: 1- PROVIDE WARNING SIGN, WHEN USED FOR NON-POTABLE WATER SEE DETAIL A276. 2- VALVE BOX LID SHALL BE LABELED ACCORDING TO SERVICE. SURROUND WITH DRAINAGE COURSE MATCH SIZE INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. PVC OR POLY PIPE BALL OR GATE VALVE LAST 3'-0" OF BURIED PIPING SHALL BE GALV STL PIPE, SCH 40 COATED OR WRAPPED PER SPECS. 6" 2'x2' CONCRETE PAD VALVE BOX TYLER TY-SPUN ADJUSTABLE W/ 5 1/4" LID SERIES 7100 WITH O-RING (OR EQUAL) 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE 1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153

ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 91C902

DETAILS
CIVIL
C:\USERS\BRETT.PRATT\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\990 DETAILS\91C901 & 91C902 -CIVIL DETAILS.DWG 5/5/2021 - - - - 0 1617
SCALE: NTS FIRE EXTINGUISHER A132 - CLASS SIZE TYPE UL CLASSIFICATION ABC PER PLAN DRY CHEMICAL 4A:80B:C CO2 PER PLAN CARBON DIOXIDE 10B:C STRUCTURE ATTACHED WITH APPROVED MOUNTING BRACKET 5'-0"

MAX HEIGHT
4"
MIN CLEARANCE FF ELEV WALL MOUNT SCALE: NTS FIRE EXTINGUISHER SIGN A147 - INDELIBLE RED LETTERS ON WHITE ARROW WITH RED BACKGROUND 4" 18" NOTE: MATERIAL TO BE SEMI-RIGID BUTYRATE OR APPROVED EQUAL. SCALE: NTS EXIT SIGN A150 - WHITE BACKGROUND WITH RED LETTERS 7 1/2" 13 1/2" 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS A S S O C I A T E S A L B E R T A. CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 92A901

DETAILS

ARCHITECTURAL
C:\USERS\DANIEL.SANDOVAL\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\990 DETAILS\92A901 - ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS.DWG 4/26/2021 -- - - - 0 1618
E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN KLEINFELDER Bright people, Right Solutions. 550 West C Street Suite : 1200 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel. (619) 831-4600 Kleinfelder.com S901 STRUCTURAL DETAILS 1

GENERAL
C:\CADD\20211860.001A - BANNING EQ BASIN\S901.DWG 4/16/2021 - - - - 0
1619
E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN KLEINFELDER Bright people, Right Solutions. 550 West C Street Suite : 1200 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel. (619) 831-4600 Kleinfelder.com S902 STRUCTURAL DETAILS 2

GENERAL
C:\CADD\20211860.001A - BANNING EQ BASIN\S902.DWG 4/16/2021 - - - - 0
1620
SCALE: NTS FLOOR PIPE SLEEVE S127
- NOTE: 1- ALL FLOOR PENETRATIONS FOR HARD PIPING OF EQUIPMENT SHALL HAVE A FLOOR SLEEVE. 1" 1/4" PLATE WALL FLANGE MATERIAL SAME AS SLEEVE PIPE SLEEVE MIN 1/4" THICK STEEL GALVANIZE AFTER FABRICATION FLOOR SLAB 1" 3" TYP POLYURETHANE SEALANT 3/16" SCALE: NTS WALL CORE S128 - PIPE THRU WALLWALL POLYURETHANE SEALANT (TYP)
1" (TYP) SCALE: NTS LINK SEAL S131
-

SEE MFR
FOR SIZE POLYURETHANE FOAM WITH POLYURETHANE SEALANT ON INTERIOR FACE IF BELOW WATER SURFACE CORE FOR PIPE PENETRATION LINK SEAL TYPE WALL PENETRATION SEAL ASSEMBLY CAST IN PLACE RING STANDARD WEIGHT GALVANIZED PIPE OR EQUAL POLYURETHANE FOAM ON EXTERIOR FACES (WHERE BURIED) NOTES: 1- PIPE SLEEVE FOR WALL PENETRATION SEAL ASSEMBLY SIZED BY MANUFACTURER. 2- BOLTS SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL. 30' MAX. 3'-6" 2'-3"
12"
MAX.
7'-6" 2'-7" TOP OF LANDING FINISH GRADE
1'-6" 13 1/2"
R=13 1/2" TYP 1/4 40° TYP. TYP 1/8 1/4"x3" HOOP GUARD TOP & BOTTOM WELD TO LADDER RUNNER(7) 1/4"x2" BARS GRIND ALL CORNERS 1/4"x2" HOOP GUARDS @ 4'-0" MAX SPACING LADDER RUNNER SCALE: NTS LADDER SAFETY CAGE S171 -
2"
3"
18" MAX
L = 5'-0" MAX BAR 2"x3/8" RUNNERS
12"
MAX
3" TYP
2"
3"
18" MAX
12"
MAX 3" 1 3/4"

GROUT AS

REQUIRED
L = DISTANCE BETWEEN
RUNNER SUPPORTS RUNNERS FOR L = 5 TO 10 FT BAR 3"x3/8" FOR L = 10 TO 20 FT BAR 3"x1/2" FOR L OVER 20 FT BAR 4"x1/2" 3/4" ANCHOR SEE PLAN 1'-6" 3" 1-3/4" 7" ALUMINUM LADDER - ALUMINUM ALLOY 6063 T-5 OR T-6 STAINLESS STEEL LADDER - STAINLESS STEEL TYPE 18-8 GALVANIZED STEEL LADDER - CARBON STEEL GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION STANDARD LADDER WITH RUNNER SUPPORTS AT 5'-0" OC MAXIMIM LADDER WITH RUNNER SUPPORTS OVER 5'-0" OC PLAN SCALE: NTS LADDER S172 - 3/4" STAINLESS STEEL WEDGE TYPE ANCHOR (ALUMINUM AND STAINLESS STEEL LADDERS) 1/2"Ø SMOOTH BAR RUNGS @ 9" OC, PLUG WELD INTO RUNNERS. FOR ALUMINUM LADDERS USE 1"Ø RUNGS BOTTOM OF HATCH COVER OR GRATING TOP OF SLAB OR WALL BOTTOM OF HATCH COVER OR GRATING TOP OF SLAB OR WALL 3/4" GALVANIZED BOLT IN 3/4" SELF OR NON-DRILLING ANCHOR (GALVANIZED LADDERS) BRACKET FLOOR BRACKET SUPPORT @ 5'-0" OC MAX 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153

ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 93S903

DETAILS

STRUCTURAL
C:\USERS\DANIEL.SANDOVAL\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\990 DETAILS\93S903 - STRUCTURAL DETAILS.DWG 5/4/2021 - - - - 0
1621
SCALE: NTS COMBINATION AIR/VACUUM VALVE M106
- AIR VENT SAME SIZE AS AIR VALVE HARD PIPE TO NEAREST DRAIN AND COVER VENT WITH NO 14 SS SCREEN (TYP) COMBINATION AIR/VACUUM RELIEF VALVE SIZE NOTED ON DRAWINGS SS BALL VALVE SIZE TO MATCH AIR VALVE SS NIPPLES SAME SIZE AS VALVE SIZE DRILL & TAP OR USE SADDLE TAP SS FITTINGS SAME SIZE AS VALVE SCALE: NTS HOSE RACK M113 - FOR CONCRETE BASE MOUNT DRILL AND EPOXY (4) 3/4" Ø SS CONCRETE ANCHOR BOLTS FOR MOUNTING ON GRATE, RUN (4) 3/4" Ø BOLTS W/WASHERS AND NUTS THRU GRATE AND 8"x4"x1/4" BACKER PLATE OF SAME MATERIAL AS HOSE RACK ON OPPOSITE SIDE OF GRATE 1'-6" 3/16" TYP 5" 8"x4"x1/4" BASE R W/(2) 7/8"HOLES FOR WALL MOUNTING DRILL AND EPOXY (4) 3/8" SS CONCRETE ANCHOR BOLTS 2" 2"
3 1/2"
3"
R7" 1 1/8" (TYP) 5 1/2"
8" FF
4'-0" BREAK SHARP EDGES NOTES: 1- WHERE HOSE RACK IS FREE-STANDING, PROVIDE (2) STEEL L'S 2x2x1/4 W/BASE PLATES OVER 2" NON-SHRINK GROUT. 2- HOSE RACK MATERIAL: 1/4" STEEL SHEET. 3- HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZE AFTER FABRICATION OR USE STAINLESS STEEL. (4) 7/16" HOLES SCALE: NTS ADJUSTABLE PIPE SUPPORT M132 - 13 1/2 1111 *SEE MFR. 183632302420161412
8106
6 3 1/266666
4444 3 1/2
344333
33 *2 1/2 9 *2 1/2 *2 1/2 *2 1/2
999 21 1/4 24 32 5/8 30 5/8 29 5/8 26 1/2 23 1/4 34 3/4 32 3/4 25 1/2 28 1/1 31 1/2 19 7/8 18 7/8 15 5/8 13 5/8 14 5/8 11 5/8 20 3/4 19 3/4 22 1/4 15 1/4 18 1/4 16 1/2 ADJUSTABLE PIPE SUPPORT APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS IN INCHES PIPE DIA 2 1/2 4 3 1/23 2 1/2
3 2 1/2 2 1/2 'A' 1 1/2 9 *2 1/2 1 1/2 1 1/2
999 'B' 'C' 8 10 1/4 8 1/2 8 1/4 MINIMUM 'D' 11 1/2 11 3/4 1412 MAXIMUM 'D' 13 1/2 13 1/2 13 1/2 13 1/2 13 1/2 'D' 'B' 'A'1"'C'
MIN
3"
MIN DRY PACK 150 LB THREADED REDUCING FLANGE GALVANIZED 'D' 'B' 'A' 'C' ADJUSTABLE PIPE SUPPORT GRINNELL FIG 264, ELCEN FIG 50, OR EQ 'U' BOLT PIPE SUPPORT GRINNEL FIG 259, ELCEN FIG 49, OR EQ SS ANCHOR BOLT OR SELF-DRILLING CONCRETE SS ANCHOR W/STUD AND (2) NUTS EA, SIZE TO SUIT FLANGE (TYP OF 4 @ 90°) SCALE: NTS PIPE ANCHOR M133
- DIMENSIONS IN INCHES 17 1/4 7 5/8 (OMIT ONE) 8 1/2 (OMIT ONE) 'D' (APPROX) 12 TO 16 (6) 7/8x8 1/2 1 1/2 13 18 TO 30 (6) 1x9 1 1/2 15 'A' (4) 3/4x7 (4) 5/8x6 6 TO 10 2 TO 4 PIPE DIA 'B' 1 1/2 1 1/4 'C' 11 5 3/4 10 1/4 1/2 3/8 5/8 1/2 'E' 3/8 1/2 'F' 3/8 1/4 1 1/2" 'D' 'D' 1 1/2" 'C' 'A' ANCHOR BOLT BENT STL R, 'E' THICK 'F' STIFFENER PLATE (TYP) ANCHOR CLAMP ELCEN FIG 405 CEILING OR WALL 'A' ANCHOR BOLT 'B' (TYP) 'E' 1"
VAR 1-2 3/16" PIPE ANCHOR CLAMP NOTES: ELCEN FIG 405 1- WHEN THICKNESS OF CONCRETE LIMITS THE USE OF ANCHOR BOLT LENGTHS AS TABULATED, SHORTER BOLTS WELDED TO REINFORCING BARS MAYBE USED. 2- GALVANIZE AFTER FABRICATION. SCALE: NTS WALL MOUNT PIPING/CONDUIT STRUT SUPPORT M142 - NOTES: 1- UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, FOR INDOOR AND OUTDOOR LOCATIONS ALL MATERIAL SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL. STRUTS SHALL BE 12 GAUGE CHANNEL (1 5/8"x1 5/8") 304 STAINLESS STEEL. PROVIDE NECESSARY STRUT ACCESSORIES TO ACCOMMODATE SUPPORT CONFIGURATION, INCLUDING CONNECTION FITTINGS AND POST BASES. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL NUTS, BOLTS,THREADED RODS, AND PIPE/CONDUIT STRAPS SHALL BE 304 STAINLESS STEEL. ALL ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL BE 304 STAINLESS STEEL. 2- STRUT SYSTEM, INCLUDING ALL COMPONENTS, SHALL BE AS MANUFACTURED BY UNISTRUT, B-LINE, OR EQUAL. 3- PROVIDE DOUBLE STRUT WHERE REQUIRED FOR LOAD OR CONFIGURATION. 4- ALL CUT ENDS OF STRUT SHALL BE GROUND SMOOTH. 5- PROVIDE PLASTIC CLOSURE CAPS WHERE INDICATED. 6- FOR WET WELLS AND CORROSIVE LOCATIONS AND WHERE NOTED AS PS3-CORROSION RESISTANT OR PS3-CR, STRUTS SHALL BE HEAVY DUTY CHANNEL NONMETALIC (VINYLESTER) AS MANUFACTURED BY AIKINSTRUT, B-LINE, OR EQUAL. PROVIDE NECESSARY STRUT ACCESSORIES TO ACCOMMODATE SUPPORT CONFIGURATION, INCLUDING CONNECTION FITTINGS AND POST BASES. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL NUTS, BOLTS, THREADED RODS, AND PIPE/CONDUIT STRAPS SHALL BE POLYURETHANE. ALL CONCRETE ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL BE 316 STAINLESS STEEL EPOXY ANCHORS. WALL/SLAB1 5/8" SQ STRUT STRUT PIPE CLAMP PIPE OR CONDUIT AS SHOWN ANCHOR WITH 3/8" SS EXP ANCHORS, 3" EMBEDMENT @ 1'-0" OC MAX AND 3" FROM EACH END 1 5/8" SQ STRUT NUMBER OF PIPES/CONDUIT AND SPACING PER DRAWINGS BOLT TO WALL WITH 3/8" SS EXP ANCHORS, 3" EMBEDMENT PROVIDE BOLTS @ 1'-0" OC AND 3" FROM ENDS 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS A S S O C I A T E S A L B E R T A. CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 94M901

DETAILS

MECHANICAL
C:\USERS\DANIEL.SANDOVAL\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\990 DETAILS\94M901 & 94M902 - MECHANICAL DETAILS.DWG 4/26/2021 - - - - 0
1622
SCALE: NTS CONDUIT STRUT SUPPORT M143 - FREE STANDING PIPING/ PER PLAN 5'-0" MAX STRUT CHANNEL

AS REQUIRED

PER PLAN
4'-6" MAX SPACING 1" NON-SHRINK GROUT LEVELING NUT (TYP) SST CONCRETE ANCHORS STRUT POST BASE PIPE CLAMPS 4-HOLE TEE PLATE OR 3-HOLE GUSSET PLATE, PER STRUT CHANNEL MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS (TYP) NOTES: 1- FOR PIPING INSTALLED HORIZONTALLY, ADD ADDITIONAL VERTICAL PREFORMED CHANNEL SUPPORT CENTERED BETWEEN HORIZONTAL SUPPORTS. 2- FOR UTILITY WATER, FOUL AIR, AND OTHER PIPING LESS THAN 4" DIAMETER (4" MAX) IS REQUIRED. 3- MATERIAL SHALL BE AS NOTED ON DRAWINGS. 4- CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN, AND FURNISH. 5- CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DESIGN AND LAYOUT SUBMITTALS FOR ENGINEERS REVIEW AND APPROVAL PER SECTION 013300. SCALE: NTS STATIONARY PIPE SUPPORT M144 - 18363230242016141210 15 1/2 23 5/8 21 5/8 20 1/2 18 1/2 17 1/2 14 1/2 13 1/2 11 1/2 9 15/16 10 1/2 8 7/16 4 PIPE SUPPORT DIMENSIONS IN INCHES PIPE DIA 4865 3" 'A' 3 5/8 4 3/16 6 15/16 5 7/16 4 13/16 'B' 'C' fig 258 5 8 3/4 2226 4" 3 5/8 'C' fig 259 6 'B' 'A' PIPE STANCHION SADDLE WITH U-BOLT, ALVIN FIG 259 PIPE STANCHION FIG 258 OR EQUAL FABRICATED STEEL CAST IRON STANCHON BASE PLATE 1" NON-SHRINK GROUT (4) 3/8" Ø 316 SS DRILL AND EPOXY (3" MIN EMBED) ALVIN PIPE STANCHION FIG 63, MATCH STANCHION WITH PIPE DESIGN 'C' STANCHON BASE PLATE CONCRETE SLAB (TYP) NOTES: 1- UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, PIPE STANCHIONS AND ACCESSORIES SHALL BE HOT GALVANIZED (HDG). 2- PROVIDE INDIVIDUAL CONCRETE SUPPORT PAD WITH #4 AT 12" OC TOP AND BOTTOM FOR PIPE STANCHIONS NOT LOCATED ON CONCRETE SLABS OF 6" MIN THICKNESS. 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE 1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES: 1/2" = HALF SCALE ORIGINAL CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO. REVISIONS AQUA ENGINEERING LLC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH DRAWING NO. SHEET

CITY OF BANNING, CA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUALIZATION BASIN E N G I N E E R I N G 533 W 2600 S, SUITE 275, BOUNTIFUL, UT 84010 PHONE (801) 299-1327 FAX (801) 299-0153
ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS A S S O C I A T E S A L B E R T A. CIVIL ENGINEERS 3788 McCRAY STREET RIVERSIDE CA. 92506 PH. (951) 686-1070 FAX (951) 788-1256 94M902

DETAILS

MECHANICAL
C:\USERS\DANIEL.SANDOVAL\ACCDOCS\AQUA ENGINEERING\001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\PROJECT FILES\990 DETAILS\94M901 & 94M902 - MECHANICAL DETAILS.DWG 4/26/2021 - - - - 0 1623

ISA INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION TABLE P&ID ABBREVIATIONS

ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS

COLLECTIONS SYSTEM

FIRE SYSTEMS

HVAC SYSTEMS

POWER SYSTEMS
A
C
F
H
P

EQUIPMENT TAG

LOOP NUMBER CRITERIA
INSTRUMENT/SCADA TAG (2) AUXILIARY PROCESS

LETTERS
(1) DEVICE IDENTIFIERS
HV-2001A
LSL1001A
A1001

AUXILIARY PROCESS LETTER
(OPTIONAL) (2)

LOOP NUMBER (SEQUENTIAL)

ISA IDENTIFIER

LOOP NUMBER

LETTER FOR MULTIPLE

INSTRUMENTS

BELONGING TO THE SAME

CONTROL LOOP
DEVICE IDENTIFIER (1)

LOOP NUMBER

DEVICE LETTER
(SEQUENTIAL AS NEEDED)
NOTE:

REFER TO ISA INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION

TABLE FOR DEFINITION OF LETTERS AAA INSIDE
THE BUBBLES. BBB REPRESENTS LOOP ID (IF
USED). SEE ABBREVIATIONS LIST FOR
SUPERSCRIPT CCC.

PANEL DEVICE

FIELD DEVICE

PILOT LIGHT
X= LENS COLOR,
R=RED, G=GREEN,
A=AMBER B=BLUE

PULSE INPUT

ANALOG INPUT

DISCRETE INPUT

PULSE OUTPUT

ANALOG OUTPUT

DISCRETE OUTPUT

PLC I/O TERMINAL

SCADA FUNCTION

DEVICE MOUNTED IN

SUBPANEL

TAG NUMBERS AND

ADDITIONAL DESIGNATIONS

P&ID INTERFACE SYMBOLS

INPUT/OUTPUT SYMBOLS

ADDITIONAL IDENTIFICATION

SEE ABBREVIATIONS AND

HAND SWITCH

DESIGNATIONS

LOOP DESIGNATION
NUMBER

SUCCEEDING LETTER(S)

PRECEDING LETTER(S)

HAND SWITCH

DESIGNATIONS
ES
FOR
FR
HOA
HOR
HORA
IOE
JOA
LOAR
LOR
LR
MA
MOA
MOR
OC
OCA
OCR
OO
OOA
OOC
OOR
OSC
POT
ROO
RST
SS

EMERGENCY STOP

FORWARD-OFF-REVERSE

FORWARD-REVERSE

HAND-OFF-AUTO

HAND-OFF-REMOTE

HAND-OFF-REMOTE-AUTO

INTERNAL-OFF-EXTERNAL

JOG-OFF-AUTO

LOWER-OFF-AUTO-RAISE

LOCAL-OFF-REMOTE

LOCAL-REMOTE

MANUAL-AUTO

MANUAL-OFF-AUTO

MOMENTARY-OFF-RUN

OPEN-CLOSE

OPEN-CLOSE-AUTO

OPEN-CLOSE-REMOTE
ON-OFF

ON-OFF-AUTO

ON-OFF-CLOSE

ON-OFF-REMOTE

OPEN-STOP-CLOSE

POTENTIOMETER

RESET-OFF-ON

RESET PUSHBUTTON

START-STOP

1. 2.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL
SYMBOLS MAY BE USED AS REQUIRED.

SYMBOLS AND NOMENCLATURE ARE BASED ON
ISA STANDARD S-5.1.

SEE ASSOCIATED ELECTRICAL SYMBOL SHEETS
FOR ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS.

PROCESS IDENTIFIERS GENERAL NOTES

PROCESS/SIGNAL LINE

TO/FROM A PRECEDING SHEET

TO (LOCATION)

DESTINATION SHEET NUMBER

LINE NUMBER CORRESPONDING TO

DESTINATION SHEET LINE NUMBER

CONTINUATION

P&ID LINETYPES

INTERNAL SYSTEM SIGNAL

LINK (SOFTWARE OR DATA
LINK)

EXISTING/FUTURE PIPING

AND EQUIPMENT

PNEUMATIC SIGNAL

HYDRAULIC SIGNAL

ELECTRICAL SIGNAL
L L L
// // //

VENDOR SUPPLIED

CHANNEL

LOOP DIVIDER

PROCESS PIPING

SUBPROCESS PIPING

EQUIPMENT

BREAK IN

SIGNAL/PROCESS

CONTINUATION OF

SIGNAL/PROCESS
TO
I1XX
FROM
I1XX

SHEET NUMBERS USED WHEN

SIGNAL/PROCESS IS CONTINUED

ON A PREVIOUS OR FUTURE
PAGE.

LX I1XX
LINE 1
LINE 2
LX I1XX
LINE 1
LINE 2

FROM (LOCATION)

PREVIOUS SHEET NUMBER

LINE NUMBER CORRESPONDING TO

PREVIOUS SHEET LINE NUMBER
AAA
BBB
CCC
AAA
BBB
CCC
AAA
BBB
CCC
AAA
BBB
CCC
AAA
BBB
CCC
AAA
BBB
AAA
BBB
LINE# PROCESS
1-10 INFLUENT TO EFFLUENT LINE
11-20 PRIMARY TREATMENT (SLUDGE, SCUM,

SCREENINGS)
21-30 SECONDARY TREATMENT (RAS/WAS)
31-40 SOLIDS HANDLING (DIGESTERS, DEWATERING,

THICKENING, CONVEYORS/TRUCKS)
41-50 TERTIARY/MISC. PROCESS (DRAINS, CLOTH

FILTERS, REUSE PUMP STATIONS)

SUBPROCESS
51-60 POTABLE/NON-POTABLE
61-80 AIR/PNEUMATIC/HYDRAULIC
81-90 CHEMICAL
91-100 MISC. SUBPROCESS
A
AIR
AS
BD
BS
C
CD
CL
CLS
CLV
CSL
CV
DN
DSL
DW
EE
EV
EWR
EWS
EX
FA
FE
FM
FOR
FOS
FS
FSP
FW
G
H
HR
HS
HW
HWR
HWS
HY
IA
LO
LSP
ML
NG
NPW
OF
PA
PD
PEA
PEC
PEF
PEN
PI
PW
RAS
RSL
RW
RWL
S
SA
SB
SD
SDR
SE
SF
SG
SN
SPD
SS
ST
SU
SUC
TSL
UW
WAS
WLO
WW

AERATION

COMPRESSED AIR

AIR SUPPLY

BOTTOM DRAIN

BENDED SLUDGE

CONDENSATE

CHEMICAL DRAIN AND VENT

CHLORINE (GAS OR LIQUID STATE)

CHLORINE SOLUTION

CHLORINE GAS UNDER VACUUM

CIRCULATED SLUDGE

CHLORINATOR VENT AND DETECTION LINE
DECANT

DIGESTED SLUDGE

DEMINERALIZED WATER

ENGINE EXHAUST

EVAPORATIVE COOLING

ENGINE COOLING WATER RETURN

ENGINE COOLING WATER SUPPLY

AIR EXHAUST

FOUL AIR

FINAL EFFLUENT

FORCE MAIN

FUEL RETURN

FUEL SUPPLY

FROTH SPRAY

FIRE PROTECTION SPRINKLER SYSTEM

FINISHED WATER
GRIT

HYPOCHLORITE

HEATING WATER RETURN

HEATING WATER SUPPLY

HOT WATER

HOT WATER RETURN

HOT WATER SUPPLY

HYDRAULIC

INSTRUMENT AIR

LUBE OIL

LANDSCAPING SPRINKLER SYSTEM

MIXED LIQUOR

NOT USED NATURAL GAS

NON-POTABLE WATER

OVERFLOW

PLANT AIR

PLANT DRAIN

POLYMER-ANIONIC

POLYMER-CATIONIC

PRIMARY EFFLUENT

POLYMER-NONIONIC

PLANT INFLUENT

POTABLE WATER

RETURN ACTIVATED SLUDGE

RAW SLUDGE

RAW WATER

RAINWATER LEADER
SCUM

SAMPLE LINE (SEE LIST AT RIGHT)

SODIUM BISULFITE

SANITARY DRAIN AND VENT

STORM DRAIN

SECONDARY EFFLUENT

SLUDGE FILTRATE

SLUDGE GAS

SUBNATANT

SUMP PUMP DISCHARGE

SANITARY SEWER
STEAM

STRUCTURE UNDERDRAIN

STRUCTURE UNDERDRAIN COLLECTOR

THICKENED SLUDGE

UTILITY WATER

WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE

WASTE LUBE OIL

WASTEWATER
AI
AO
ARV
AS
BWL
CL2
CV
DCS
DI
DO
DP
DWG
ETM
ETMf
ETMs
ES
FA
FC
FE
FVNR
FVR
GA
GCP
GND
GPD
GPH
GPM
H2S
HMI
IO
ISB
LAN
LCP
M
MA
MCC
MFR(S)
MGD
MGL
MLR
MO
MOD
MTU
NTU
OIT
OL
PER
PLC
PNL
POS
POT
PPM
PR
PSI
PV
RF
RIO
RST
RTU
RVSS
SB
SD
SLC
SO2
SP
SPD
SV
T/M
TSS
TWL
UG
VFD
VTP

ANALOG INPUT

ANALOG OUTPUT

AIR RELIEF VALVE

AIR SUPPLY

BOTTOM WATER LEVEL

CHLORINE

CONTROL VALVE/CONTROL VARIABLE

DISTRIBUTED CONTROL SYSTEM

DISCRETE INPUT

DISSOLVED OXYGEN

DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE

DRAWING

ELAPSED TIME METER

ELAPSED TIME METER (FAST SPEED)

ELAPSED TIME METER (SLOW SPEED)

EMERGENCY STOP

FOUL AIR

FAIL CLOSED

FLOW ELEMENT

FULL VOLTAGE NON-REVERSING

FULL VOLTAGE REVERSING

GALLONS

GENERATOR CONTROL PANEL
GROUND

GALLONS PER DAY

GALLONS PER HOUR

GALLONS PER MINUTE

HYDROGEN SULFIDE

HUMAN MACHINE INTERFACE

INPUT/OUTPUT

INTRINSICALLY SAFE BARRIER

LOCAL AREA NETWORK

LOCAL CONTROL PANEL
MOTOR

MILLIAMP

MOTOR CONTROL CENTER

MANUFACTURER(S)

MILLION GALLONS PER DAY

MILLIGRAMS PER LITER

MIXED LIQUOR RETURN

MOISTURE

MODULATING

MASTER TELEMETRY UNIT

TURBIDITY

OPERATOR INTERFACE TERMINAL

OVERLOAD

PERMISSIVE

PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROLLER
PANEL

POSITION

POTENTIOMETER

PARTS PER MILLION
PAIR

POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH

PROCESS VARIABLE

RADIO FREQUENCY

REMOTE INPUT OUTPUT
RESET

REMOTE TELEMETRY UNIT

REVERSE VOLTAGE SOFT START

SLUDGE BLANKET

SMOKE DETECTOR

SINGLE LOOP CONTROLLER

SULFUR DIOXIDE

SET POINT/SPARE
SPEED

SOLENOID OPERATED VALVE

TEMPERATURE AND/OR MOISTURE

TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS

TOP WATER LEVEL

UNDERGROUND

VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE

VERTICAL TURBINE PUMP

EMERGENCY
ALARM

PRIMARY ELEMENT

INDICATE
DEVICE
LIGHT

ORIFICE,

RESTRICTION

MULTIFUNCTION

UNCLASSIFIED

RECORD, OR PRINT

POINT CONNECTION

READOUT OR PASSIVE

GLASS, VIEWING

MOISTURE
G
GAUGE

UNCLASSIFIED

EVENT, STATE, OR

VIBRATION, MECHANICAL

MULTIVARIABLE

Z POSITION, DIMENSION
W
X
Y
U
V

WEIGHT, FORCE

PRESENCE
Z-AXIS
X-AXIS
Y-AXIS
WELL

CURRENT (ELECTRICAL)

TIME, TIME SCHEDULE

TEMPERATURE

SPEED, FREQUENCY
Q
T
S
R
P
O

QUANTITY

RADIATION

USER'S CHOICE

PRESSURE, VACUUM
K
L
M
N
H
I
J
LEVEL
MOTOR
VIDEO
HAND
POWER

TOTALIZE
SAFETY

INTEGRATE,

MOMENTARY

TIME RATE OF
CHANGE
SCAN

SPECIFIC GRAVITY

PRECEEDING LETTERS

CONDUCTIVITY

BURNER, COMBUSTION

MEASURED OR INITIATING
F
E
A
C
D
B

FLOW RATE

VOLTAGE

DENSITY OR

ANALYSIS

VARIABLE
RATIO

DIFFERENTIAL

MODIFIER

RELAY, COMPUTE,

FINAL CONTROL

DRIVER, ACTUATOR,

ELEMENT

UNCLASSIFIED

CONVERT

MULTIFUNCTION

VALVE, LOUVER

UNCLASSIFIED

MULTIFUNCTION

CONTROL STATION
SWITCH

TRANSMIT
STOP
OPEN
LOW
MIDDLE
NORMAL
HIGH

OUTPUT FUNCTION

SUCCEEDING LETTERS

USER'S CHOICE

CONTROL

FUNCTION

USER'S CHOICE

MODIFIER

ANALYSIS

USER'S CHOICE USER'S CHOICE

P&ID CONTINUATION

ARROW LINE NUMBER

SEQUENCE
0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES:
1/2" = HALF SCALE

ORIGINAL
CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO.

REVISIONS
SKM ENGINEERING INC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH
DRAWING NO.

SHEET CITY OF BANNING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUALIZATION BASIN 533 W 2600 S, Suite 25
Bountiful, Utah 84010
Phone: (801) 677-0011
www.skmeng.com
I001LEGEND INSTRUMENTATION - GENERAL
C:\USERS\MICHAEL.JOHNSON\AQUA ENGINEERING\CITY OF BANNING - 001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\050 DRAFTING\998 INSTRUMENTATION\998-I001.DWG 4/21/2021 MPJ DCL MPJ 00/00/0000 0

CNV CONVEYANCE EQUIPMENT

CV CHECK VALVE

FV AUTOMATIC VALVE (ACTUATED VALVE)
G GATE

H HVAC/ODOR

HV HAND VALVE

M METERING

ME CHEMICAL/MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT

MFV MULTIFUNCTION VALVE
P PUMP

SPV SAMPLE VALVE

SV SOLENOID VALVE
1624
DRAIN

BLIND FLANGE

CAPPED OR PLUGGED
END

QUICK CONNECT/

DISCONNECT

ECCENTRIC PLUG
VALVE

PINCH VALVE

BUTTERFLY VALVE

BALL VALVE

BACK PRESSURE

RELIEF VALVE

DIAPHRAGM VALVE

BALANCING VALVE

PRESSURE RELIEF
VALVE

GATE VALVE

MIX VALVE

NEEDLE VALVE
GLOBE
VALVE
3 WAY VALVE
4 WAY VALVE

SLEEVE VALVE

CHECK VALVE

LUBRICATED PLUG
VALVE

ANGLE VALVE

KNIFE VALVE

PRESSURE REDUCING
VALVE
VALVES
HVAC

CENTRIFUGAL PUMP

MECHANICAL

DIAPHRAGM PUMP

METERING PUMP

PERISTALTIC PUMP

ROTARY LOBE PUMP

SUBMERSIBLE PUMP

VERTICAL TURBINE
PUMP

PROGRESSIVE CAVITY
PUMP
GATES

SLIDE GATE

STOP GATE

SLUICE GATE
ACTUATOR:

H=HYDRAULIC,
M=MOTOR,
P=PNEUMATIC,
S=SOLENOID
MANUAL
X

ACTUATORS
PIPING

PNEUMATIC

DIAPHRAGM WITH

POSITIONER

PNEUMATIC

DIAPHRAGM

Y-STRAINER

REDUCER

MISCELLANEOUS

MAGNETIC FLOW

ELEMENT

MASS FLOW ELEMENT

ANNUBAR (INSERTION)

PROPELLER FLOW

ELEMENT (INSERTION)

MASS FLOW ELEMENT

ANNUBAR (SPOOL)

PROPELLER FLOW

ELEMENT (SPOOL)

FLOW ELEMENTS

AIR COMPRESSOR

AIR FILTER
DAMPER

HEAT EXCHANGER

GUIDE VANES

LOUVER WITH HOOD

SILENCER

UNIT HEATER
FILTER
PUMPS

ULTRASONIC FLOW

ELEMENT
(INSERTION)

ULTRASONIC FLOW

ELEMENT (SPOOL)

THERMAL MASS FLOW

ELEMENT (INSERTION)

THERMAL MASS FLOW

ELEMENT (SPOOL)

ROTAMETER

MUD VALVE

FLEXIBLE CONNECTOR

MIXED FLOW PUMP

VACUUM VALVE
MM
MM
M
MMMM

TELESCOPING VALVE

FLAPPER GATE
M
FEFEFEFEPITOT TUBE
FEFEFEFEFEFEFEFLOAT SWITCH

DO SENSOR

DO ANALYZER

ORP SENSOR

ANALYZER ELEMENT

ORP ANALYZER

PRIMARY ELEMENT

SYMBOLS
pH SENSOR
pH ANALYZER

ULTRASONIC

LEVEL TRANSDUCER
AE
AIT
DO
AE
DO
LSAIT
ORP
AE
ORP
AIT
pH
AE
pH

LE RADAR

LEVEL TRANSDUCER
LE
0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES:
1/2" = HALF SCALE

ORIGINAL
CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO.

REVISIONS
SKM ENGINEERING INC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH
DRAWING NO.

SHEET CITY OF BANNING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUALIZATION BASIN 533 W 2600 S, Suite 25
Bountiful, Utah 84010
Phone: (801) 677-0011
www.skmeng.com
I002 SYMBOLS INSTRUMENTATION - GENERAL
C:\USERS\MICHAEL.JOHNSON\AQUA ENGINEERING\CITY OF BANNING - 001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\050 DRAFTING\998 INSTRUMENTATION\998-I002.DWG 4/21/2021 MPJ DCL MPJ 00/00/0000 0
1625

SCADA PLC ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT FIELD
TO EQ
BASIN PUMP 1
L1 I102
0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES:
1/2" = HALF SCALE

ORIGINAL
CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO.

REVISIONS
SKM ENGINEERING INC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH
DRAWING NO.

SHEET CITY OF BANNING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUALIZATION BASIN 533 W 2600 S, Suite 25
Bountiful, Utah 84010
Phone: (801) 677-0011
www.skmeng.com
I101 EQUALIZATION BASIN INSTRUMENTATION - P&ID
C:\USERS\MICHAEL.JOHNSON\AQUA ENGINEERING\CITY OF BANNING - 001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\050 DRAFTING\998 INSTRUMENTATION\998-I101.DWG 5/5/2021 MPJ DCL MPJ 00/00/0000 0

EQUALIZATION BASIN
LOOPS:

FROM EXISTING

WPW SYSTEM
FV-11101
ZS
11101
ZS
11102
FV-11132 FV-11142 FV-11102
ZS
11111
ZS
11112
LCP-11101

TYPICAL
OF 2

TIPPING

BUCKETS

TIPPING
BUCKET
ME-11101

TIPPING
BUCKET
ME-11102

TIPPING
BUCKET
ME-11111

TIPPING
BUCKET
ME-11112
20"
4"
3" 3" 3" 3" TIPPING BUCKET 3 FILL VALVE REMOTE
ZI
11102
ZI
11102
TIPPING BUCKET 3FILL VALVEOPEN
ZLO
11102
ZLO
11102
TIPPING BUCKET 3FILL VALVECLOSED
ZLC
11102
ZLC
11102
TIPPING BUCKET 3FILL VALVEOPEN COMMAND
ZCO
11102
ZCO
11102
ZSC
11101
ZSO
11101
ZSC
11132
ZSO
11132
ZSC
11142
ZSO
11142
ZSC
11102
ZSO
11102
OSC
11101
LOR
11101
OSC
11132
LOR
11132
OSC
11142
LOR
11142
OSC
11102
LOR
11102
LCP-11111
120VAC
TIPPING BUCKET 3TIPPED
ZI
11111
ZI
11111

TYPICAL
OF 2

TIPPING

BUCKETS
TIPPING BUCKET 1FILL VALVEREMOTE
ZI
11101
ZI
11101
TIPPING BUCKET 1FILL VALVEOPEN
ZLO
11101
ZLO
11101
TIPPING BUCKET 1FILL VALVECLOSED
ZLC
11101
ZLC
11101
TIPPING BUCKET 1FILL VALVEOPEN COMMAND
ZCO
11101
ZCO
11101
TIPPING BUCKET 1TIPPED
ZI
11101
ZI
11101
120VAC

HV-XXXX

TYPICAL
OF 2

TIPPING

BUCKETS

TYPICAL
OF 2

TIPPING

BUCKETS
TIPPING BUCKET 3FILL VALVECLOSE COMMAND
ZCC
11102
ZCC
11102
TIPPING BUCKET 1FILL VALVECLOSE COMMAND
ZCC
11101
ZCC
11101
LE
11090 EQUALIZATION BASIN 1 LEVEL
LI
11090
LI
11090
LSH
11091 EQUALIZATION BASIN 1 LEVEL ALARM HIGH
LAH
11091
LAH
11091
LIT
11090
120VAC
FROM

PRIMARY

CLARIFIERS
SUMP
LSL
11050 SUMP
24"
20" OVERFLOW
G-11102
10"
TO EQ
BASIN PUMP 2
L1 I102
TO EQ
BASIN PUMP 3
L1 I102
10" 10"
18"
EQUALIZATION BASIN 1

WET WEATHER STORAGE

EQ BASINSUMPLEVEL ALARM LOW
LAL
11050
LAL
11050

DIURNAL FLOW
EQUALIZATION BASIN 1
G-11101
MMMM
20" OVERFLOW
LE
11190 EQUALIZATION BASIN 2 LEVEL
LI
11190
LI
11190
LSH
11191 EQUALIZATION BASIN 2 LEVEL ALARM HIGH
LAH
11191
LAH
11191
LIT
11190
120VAC
EQUALIZATION BASIN 2
LSL
11050 EQ BASIN 2 SUMP LEVEL ALARM LOW
LAL
11150
LAL
11150
1626

SCADA PLC ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT FIELD

FROM EQ

BASIN SUMP
L1 I101
0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES:
1/2" = HALF SCALE

ORIGINAL
CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO.

REVISIONS
SKM ENGINEERING INC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH
DRAWING NO.

SHEET CITY OF BANNING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUALIZATION BASIN 533 W 2600 S, Suite 25
Bountiful, Utah 84010
Phone: (801) 677-0011
www.skmeng.com
I102 EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP STATION INSTRUMENTATION - P&ID C:\USERS\MICHAEL.JOHNSON\AQUA ENGINEERING\CITY OF BANNING - 001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\050 DRAFTING\998 INSTRUMENTATION\998-I102.DWG 5/3/2021 MPJ DCL MPJ 00/00/0000 0
EQUALIZATION BASIN PUMP 1-3:

P-XXXX, P-XXXX, P-XXXX
LOOPS:

M
FE
11210
ZI
11201
YI
11201
YA
11201
YC
11201
SC
11201
SI
11201
ZI
11201 EQ BASIN PUMP 1 REMOTE
YI
11201 EQ BASIN PUMP 1 RUN
YA
11201 EQ BASIN PUMP 1 FAIL
YC
11201 EQ BASIN PUMP 1 START COMMAND
SI
11201 EQ BASIN PUMP 1 SPEED
SC
11201 EQ BASIN PUMP 1 SPEED COMMAND
FI
11210 EQ BASIN PUMPS TO FINE SCREENS FLOW
FI
11210
FQI
11210
FQI
11210 EQ BASIN PUMPS TO FINE SCREENS FLOW TOTAL
480VAC
MFV-11211
HS
11201A
HOR
HS
11202A
HOR
HS
11203A
HOR
120VAC
YLG
RUN
YAR
FAIL
SK
XXXX
POT
HS
11201B
RST
KQI
11201
FIT
11210
M

EQ BASIN
PUMP 1
P-11201
CV-11201 HV-11201
M

EQ BASIN
PUMP 2
P-11202
CV-11202 HV-11202
M

EQ BASIN
PUMP 3
P-11203
CV-11203 HV-11203C
HV-11212
VFD-P-11202
ZI
11202
YI
11202
YA
11202
YC
11202
SC
11202
SI
11202
ZI
11202 EQ BASIN PUMP 2 REMOTE
YI
11202 EQ BASIN PUMP 2 RUN
YA
11202 EQ BASIN PUMP 2 FAIL
YC
11202 EQ BASIN PUMP 2 START COMMAND
SI
11202 EQ BASIN PUMP 2 SPEED
SC
11202 EQ BASIN PUMP 2 SPEED COMMAND
YLG
RUN
YAR
FAIL
SK
11202
POT
HS
11202B
RST
KQI
11202
ZI
11203
YI
11203
YA
11203
YC
11203
SC
11203
SI
11203
ZI
11203 EQ BASIN PUMP 3 REMOTE
YI
11203 EQ BASIN PUMP 3 RUN
YA
11203 EQ BASIN PUMP 3 FAIL
YC
11203 EQ BASIN PUMP 3 START COMMAND
SI
11203 EQ BASIN PUMP 3 SPEED
SC
11203 EQ BASIN PUMP 3 SPEED COMMAND
YLG
RUN
YAR
FAIL
SK
XXXX
POT
HS
11203B
RST
KQI
11203
M-11210
10"
10"
10"
18"
VFD-P-11201 VFD-P-11203
480VAC 480VAC
LCP-11202
18" TO HUMUS

RECIRCULATION

PUMP STATION

FROM EQ

BASIN SUMP
L2 I101

FROM EQ

BASIN SUMP
L3 I101
10"
10"
10"
1627
0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES:
1/2" = HALF SCALE

ORIGINAL
CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO.

REVISIONS
SKM ENGINEERING INC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH
DRAWING NO.

SHEET CITY OF BANNING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUALIZATION BASIN 533 W 2600 S, Suite 25
Bountiful, Utah 84010
Phone: (801) 677-0011
www.skmeng.com
I402INSTRUMENTATION - PLC DRAWINGS TYPICAL TERMINAL BLOCK LAYOUTS C:\USERS\MICHAEL.JOHNSON\AQUA ENGINEERING\CITY OF BANNING - 001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\050 DRAFTING\998 INSTRUMENTATION\998-I401.DWG 4/23/2021 MPJ DCL MPJ 00/00/0000 0

LEGEND, NOTES & BILL OF MATERIAL

MANUFACTURER/SHOP WIRE

TYPICALLY INSTALLED OFF-SITE

FIELD/CONTRACTOR

INSTALLED WIRE

EXISTING OR FUTURE

FIELD/CONTRACTOR

INSTALLED WIRE

EXISTING OR FUTURE

MANUFACTURER/SHOP WIRE

DEVICE CONNECTION

LUG OR TERMINAL

SCHEMATIC POINT OF

CONNECTION

TRIP RATING

BREAKER TYPE

AMPERE RATING

FUSE TYPE

CIRCUIT BREAKER
FUSE

SOLENOID VALVE

NORMALLY CLOSED CONTACT

NORMALLY OPEN CONTACT

MOTOR STARTER,

CONTACTOR, RELAY OR

TIMER COIL
M
2 POSITION SELECTOR SWITCH
POSITION LEGEND: X=CLOSED
O=OPEN
3 POSITION SELECTOR

SWITCH HAND - OFF - AUTO
POSITION LEGEND:

X=CLOSED O=OPEN

NORMALLY CLOSED PUSH BUTTON
3 POSITION SELECTOR SWITCH

OPEN - CLOSE - AUTO POSITION
LEGEND: X=CLOSED O=OPEN

NORMALLY OPEN PUSH
BUTTON
3 POSITION SELECTOR SWITCH

FORWARD - OFF - REVERSE
POSITION LEGEND: X=CLOSED
O=OPEN

GROUND CONNECTION

TIMER RELAY CONTACT

NORMALLY OPEN TIME DELAY
CLOSE

EQUIPMENT

PROGRAMMING

CONSOLE

FLOAT SWITCH - MAKE ON FALL

TYPICAL SWITCH CONFIGURATION

FLOAT SWITCH -BREAK ON RISE

FLOAT SWITCH - BREAK ON FALL

FLOAT SWITCH - MAKE ON RISE

SWITCH TYPE SYMBOL (SEE BELOW)

LEVEL SWITCH

PRESSURE SWITCH

FLOW OR TORQUE SWITCH

TEMPERATURE SWITCH

LIMIT SWITCH
AMPERE

ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR

ANALOG INPUT

AMPS INTERRUPTING CAPACITY

ANALOG OUTPUT

AIR SUPPLY

AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH

CONDUIT

CIRCUIT BREAKER

CHLORINE

CONTROL POWER TRANSFORMER

COMMUNICATIONS TERMINATION CABINET

COPPER, BARE

CONTROL VALVE

DISTRIBUTED CONTROL SYSTEM

DISCRETE INPUT

DISCRETE OUTPUT

DISTRIBUTION PANEL

DISCONNECT SWITCH

DIFFERENTIAL VOLTAGE/TIME

DRAWING

ELAPSED TIME METER

ELECTRONIC OVERLOAD

FLOW ELEMENT

FULL LOAD AMPS

FIBER OPTIC CABLE

FORWARD-OFF-REVERSE

FLOW SWITCH

FULL VOLTAGE NON-REVERSING

GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER

GROUND FAULT PROTECTION
GROUND

GALLONS PER MINUTE

GALVANIZED RIGID STEEL

HYDROGEN SULFIDE

HUMAN MACHINE INTERFACE

HAND-OFF-AUTO

HAND-OFF-REMOTE

CURRENT

INSTRUMENTATION CABLE

INPUT/OUTPUT

SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT

JUNCTION BOX

LOCAL AREA NETWORK

LOCAL CONTROL PANEL

LOCK-OUT-STOP

LIGHTING PANEL

LOCAL/REMOTE

LEVEL SWITCH

LIQUIDTIGHT FLEXIBLE METAL CONDUIT
MOTOR

MANUAL/AUTO, MILLIAMP

MANUFACTURER'S CABLE

MAIN CIRCUIT BREAKER

MOTOR CONTROL CENTER

MOTOR CIRCUIT PROTECTOR

MANUFACTURER(S)

MILLION GALLONS PER DAY

MANHOLE

MOTOR OPERATED VALVE

MASTER TELEMETRY UNIT

NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE

NORMALLY OPEN TIMED CLOSED

NON-POTABLE WATER

NOT TO SCALE

TURBIDITY

OPERATOR INTERFACE TERMINAL

OVERLOAD

ON/OFF (MAINTAINED)

OFF-REMOTE

PULL BOX

PERSONAL COMPUTER

PHASE/POWER FAILURE RELAY

PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROLLER
PANEL

PARTS PER MILLION
PAIR

PRESSURE

PRESSURE SWITCH

POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH

PROCESS VARIABLE

REMOTE CONTROL PANEL

RADIO FREQUENCY

REMOTE INPUT OUTPUT
RESET

RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE DETECTOR

REMOTE TELEMETRY UNIT

REDUCED VOLTAGE SOFT STARTER

SERVICE ENTRANCE EQUIPMENT

SERVICE ENTRANCE SECTION

START-LOCK-OFF-STOP

SUBMERSIBLE MANUFACTURER CABLE

SULFUR DIOXIDE

SET POINT/SPARE

SURGE PROTECTION DEVICE

START/STOP

SHUNT TRIP

TELEPHONE CABLE

TEMPERATURE SWITCH

TYPICAL

UNDERGROUND
VOLT

VOLTAMP

VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE

WATT, WIRE

WEATHERPROOF

TRANSFORMER

POSITION SWITCH
A
AFF
AI
AIC
AO
AS
ATS C
CB
CL2
CPT
CTC
CU
CV
DCS
DI
DO
DP
DS
DV/DT
DWG
ETM
EOL
FE
FLA
FOC
FOR
FS
FVNR
GFCI
GFP
GND
GPM
GRS
H2S
HMI
HOA
HOR I
IC
IO
ISCJ
LAN
LCP
LOS
LP
LR
LS
LTC M
MA
MC
MCB
MCC
MCP
MFR(S)
MGD
MH
MOV
MTU
NEC
NOTC
NPW
NTS
NTU
OIT
OL
OO
OR
PB
PC
PFR
PLC
PNL
PPM
PRP
PS
PSI
PV
RCP
RF
RIO
RST
RTD
RTU
RVSS
SEQ
SES
SLOS
SMC
SO2
SP
SPD
SS
ST
TC
TS
TYP
UGV
VA
VFD W
WP
XFMR
ZS

TERMINAL LABEL

LOCAL PANEL OR DEVICE TERMINAL BLOCK

PLC PANEL TERMINAL BLOCK

MCC TERMINAL BLOCK

FRAME SIZE
XXXX

DEVICE TERMINAL BLOCK

TERMINAL LABEL

TERMINAL LABEL

TERMINAL LABEL
NOTC
100AF
50AT
MCP
30A R

THE COMPLETED INSTALLATION SHALL COMPLY

WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL
CODES, ORDINANCES, AND REGULATIONS. ALL

WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED IN A NEAT,

WORKMANLIKE MANNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH

THE LATEST NEC STANDARDS OF INSTALLATION
UNDER COMPETENT SUPERVISION. INSTALL
GROUNDING PER NEC.

ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE NEW AND OF THE BEST

QUALITY, MANUFACTURED IN ACCORDANCE WITH

NEMA, ANSI, UL, OR OTHER APPLICABLE
STANDARDS. THE USE OF MANUFACTURERS'

NAMES, MODELS, AND NUMBERS IS INTENDED TO

ESTABLISH STYLE, QUALITY, APPEARANCE,
USEFULNESS, AND BID PRICE.

PROTECT ALL ELECTRICAL MATERIAL AND

EQUIPMENT INSTALLED AGAINST DAMAGE BY

OTHER TRADES, WEATHER CONDITIONS, OR ANY
OTHER PREVENTABLE CAUSES. EQUIPMENT

DAMAGED DURING SHIPPING OR CONSTRUCTION,

PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE ENGINEER OR
OWNER, WILL BE REJECTED AS DEFECTIVE.

ALL COMPONENTS SHALL BE FREE OF DUST, GRIT,

AND FOREIGN MATERIALS, AND LEFT AS NEW
BEFORE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK. DAMAGED

PAINT AND FINISHES SHALL BE TOUCHED UP OR

PAINTED WITH MATCHING COLOR PAINT AND
FINISH.

CIRCUIT CONDUCTORS #6 AWG OR SMALLER
SHALL BE THWN STRANDED COPPER. #4 TO #2
AWG SHALL BE XHHW STRANDED COPPER. #1 AWG
OR LARGER SHALL BE XHHW-2 STRANDED
COPPER. MINIMUM POWER CONDUCTOR SIZE
SHALL BE #12 AWG WITH #12 GROUND. ALL WIRE
TO BE SIZED PER NEC TABLE 316-10, 75ºC BASED
ON 30ºC AMBIENT.

SAFETY SWITCHES, ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT, CONTROL PANELS AND OTHER

ELECTRICAL DEVICES SHALL BE UL LISTED, AND
RATED FOR HEAVY DUTY SERVICE.

DEVICE WIRING SHALL BE SPECIFICATION GRADE.

TYPICAL DETAILS SHALL APPLY IN ALL CASES,
WHETHER SPECIFICALLY REFERRED TO OR NOT.

H
O
A
XOO
O
C
A
XOO
F
O
R
XOO
START
STOP
OFF ON
OX

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.
1628
0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES:
1/2" = HALF SCALE

ORIGINAL
CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO.

REVISIONS
SKM ENGINEERING INC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH
DRAWING NO.

SHEET CITY OF BANNING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUALIZATION BASIN 533 W 2600 S, Suite 25
Bountiful, Utah 84010
Phone: (801) 677-0011
www.skmeng.com
I402INSTRUMENTATION - PLC DRAWINGS TYPICAL TERMINAL BLOCK LAYOUTS C:\USERS\MICHAEL.JOHNSON\AQUA ENGINEERING\CITY OF BANNING - 001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\050 DRAFTING\998 INSTRUMENTATION\998-I402.DWG 4/25/2021 MPJ DCL MPJ 00/00/0000 0
CB1 CB1
G G
N N
L L
TB
AC
TB
AC
120VAC
F3
120VAC
F2
120VAC
F1
120VAC
F4
120VAC
F6
120VAC
F5
101 TYPICAL TB-AC TERMINAL BLOCK LAYOUT
TYP
1 2
3 NOTES:

THESE DETAILS REFLECT THE GENERAL STRATEGY IN LAYING OUT THE TERMINAL BLOCKS. THE ACTUAL LAYOUTS WILL VARY BASED ON THE NUMBER OF COMPONENTS REQUIRED FOR EACH GROUP.

PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 100% SPARE NEUTRAL AND GROUND
TERMINALS.

USE JUMPER BARS TO BUS TOGETHER THE FUSE TERMINALS,
NEUTRAL TERMINALS, AND 0V TERMINALS.

REFER TO SHEET I-01 FOR BILL OF MATERIALS

TYPICAL TB-DC
102 TERMINAL BLOCK LAYOUT
TYP
GND

GND GND
GND
GND

GND GND
GND
GND

GND GND
GND
N
N N
N
N
N N
N
N
N N
N
15A
TMC 81C 15A2907571
TB
DCA
TB
DCA

PS-A PS-A
+24VDC
F200
+24VDC
F201
+24VDC
F202
+24VDC
F203
+24VDC
F204
GND

GND GND
GND
GND

GND GND
GND
0V
0V 0V
0V
0V
0V 0V
0V
+24VDC
F205
+24VDC
F206
+24VDC
F207
+24VDC
F208
0V
0V 0V
0V
0V
0V 0V
0V
0V
0V 0V
0V
GND

GND GND
GND
GND

GND GND
GND
GND

GND GND
GND
5A
TMC 81C 5A2907562
TB
R1S2
TB
R1S2
R0
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7

TYPICAL TB-DI
103 TERMINAL BLOCK LAYOUT
TYP

TYPICAL TB-DO
104 TERMINAL BLOCK LAYOUT
TYP

TYPICAL TB-AI
105 TERMINAL BLOCK LAYOUT
TYP
00 C
00 NO
00 NO 00
C
01 C
01 NO
01 NO 01
C
02 C
02 NO
02 NO 02
C
03 C
03 NO
03 NO 03
C
04 C
04 NO
04 NO 04
C
05 C
05 NO
05 NO 05
C
06 C
06 NO
06 NO 06
C
07 C
07 NO
07 NO 07
C
FXX
00 00
FXX
FXX
01 01
FXX
FXX
02 02
FXX
FXX
03 03
FXX
FXX
04 04
FXX
FXX
05 05
FXX
FXX
06 06
FXX
FXX
07 07
FXX
FXX
08 08
FXX
FXX
09 09
FXX
FXX
10 10
FXX
FXX
11 11
FXX
FXX
12 12
FXX
FXX
13 13
FXX
FXX
14 14
FXX
FXX
15 15
FXX
SP
S1+
SP
S1-
SP
S1- SP
S1+
TB
AI
TB
AI
SHLD 07- 07+ 07+ 07- SHLD
SHLD 06- 06+ 06+ 06- SHLD
SHLD 05- 05+ 05+ 05- SHLD
SHLD 04- 04+ 04+ 04- SHLD
SHLD 03- 03+ 03+ 03- SHLD
SHLD 02- 02+ 02+ 02- SHLD
SHLD 01- 01+ 01+ 01- SHLD
0V 00F +24VDC 0V
0V 01F +24VDC 0V
0V 02F +24VDC 0V
0V 03F +24VDC 0V
0V 04F +24VDC 0V
0V 05F +24VDC 0V
0V 06F +24VDC 0V
0V 07F +24VDC 0V
SHLD 00- 00+ 00+ 00- SHLD
SHLD 07- 07+ 07+ 07- SHLD
SHLD 06- 06+ 06+ 06- SHLD
SHLD 05- 05+ 05+ 05- SHLD
SHLD 04- 04+ 04+ 04- SHLD
SHLD 03- 03+ 03+ 03- SHLD
SHLD 02- 02+ 02+ 02- SHLD
SHLD 01- 01+ 01+ 01- SHLD
SHLD 00- 00+ 00+ 00- SHLD

TYPICAL TB-AI
106 TERMINAL BLOCK LAYOUT
TYP
1629

PANEL LABEL
SERVICE PERSONNEL.

ENTRY ONLY BY AUTHORIZED
BURN HAZARD. CABINET
ELECTRICAL SHOCK AND ! DANGER
PANEL.

PERSONNEL SHOULD ENTER THIS

ONLY AUTHORIZED AND QUALIFIED
AND INTERNAL SOURCES.

POWER FROM SEVERAL EXTERNAL

MULTIPLE VOLTAGE SOURCES
THIS PANEL CONTAINS ELECTRICAL ! WARNING
CB1 CB1
G G
N N
L L
TB

AC TBAC
120VAC F3
120VAC F2
120VAC F1
120VAC F4
120VAC F6
120VAC F5

GND GND GND GND

GND GND GND GND
GND GND GND GND N N N N N N N N N N N N 15A
TB

DCA TBDCA

PS-A PS-A
+24VDC F200
+24VDC F201
+24VDC F202
+24VDC F203
+24VDC F204

GND GND GND GND

GND GND GND GND
0V 0V 0V 0V
0V 0V 0V 0V
+24VDC F205
+24VDC F206
+24VDC F207
+24VDC F208
0V 0V 0V 0V
0V 0V 0V 0V
0V 0V 0V 0V

GND GND GND GND

GND GND GND GND

GND GND GND GND
5A
R0
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
00C
00 NO 00NO 00C
01C
01 NO 01NO 01C
02C
02 NO 02NO 02C
03C
03 NO 03NO 03C
04C
04 NO 04NO 04C
05C
05 NO 05NO 05C
06C
06 NO 06NO 06C
07C
07 NO 07NO 07C
TB

AI TBAI
SHLD 07- 07+ 07+ 07- SHLD
SHLD 06- 06+ 06+ 06- SHLD
SHLD 05- 05+ 05+ 05- SHLD
SHLD 04- 04+ 04+ 04- SHLD
SHLD 03- 03+ 03+ 03- SHLD
SHLD 02- 02+ 02+ 02- SHLD
SHLD 01- 01+ 01+ 01- SHLD
0V 00F 0V+24VDC
0V 01F 0V+24VDC
0V 02F 0V+24VDC
0V 03F 0V+24VDC
0V 04F 0V+24VDC
0V 05F 0V+24VDC
0V 06F 0V+24VDC
0V 07F 0V+24VDC
SHLD 00- 00+ 00+ 00- SHLD
TB
R1S2 TBR1S2
FXX 00 00 FXX
FXX 01 01 FXX
FXX 02 02 FXX
FXX 03 03 FXX
FXX 04 04 FXX
FXX 05 05 FXX
FXX 06 06 FXX
FXX 07 07 FXX
FXX 08 08 FXX
FXX 09 09 FXX
FXX 10 10 FXX
FXX 11 11 FXX
FXX 12 12 FXX
FXX 13 13 FXX
FXX 14 14 FXX
FXX 15 15 FXX
SP
S1+
SP
S1- SPS1- SP
S1+
TB
R1S2 TBR1S2
FXX 00 00 FXX
FXX 01 01 FXX
FXX 02 02 FXX
FXX 03 03 FXX
FXX 04 04 FXX
FXX 05 05 FXX
FXX 06 06 FXX
FXX 07 07 FXX
FXX 08 08 FXX
FXX 09 09 FXX
FXX 10 10 FXX
FXX 11 11 FXX
FXX 12 12 FXX
FXX 13 13 FXX
FXX 14 14 FXX
FXX 15 15 FXX
SP
S1+
SP
S1- SPS1- SP
S1+
SHLD 07- 07+ 07+ 07- SHLD
SHLD 06- 06+ 06+ 06- SHLD
SHLD 05- 05+ 05+ 05- SHLD
SHLD 04- 04+ 04+ 04- SHLD
SHLD 03- 03+ 03+ 03- SHLD
SHLD 02- 02+ 02+ 02- SHLD
SHLD 01- 01+ 01+ 01- SHLD
SHLD 00- 00+ 00+ 00- SHLD
0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES:
1/2" = HALF SCALE

ORIGINAL
CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO.

REVISIONS
SKM ENGINEERING INC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH
DRAWING NO.

SHEET CITY OF BANNING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUALIZATION BASIN 533 W 2600 S, Suite 25
Bountiful, Utah 84010
Phone: (801) 677-0011
www.skmeng.com
I403 TYPICAL PANEL LAYOUT INSTRUMENTATION - PLC DRAWINGS C:\USERS\MICHAEL.JOHNSON\AQUA ENGINEERING\CITY OF BANNING - 001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\050 DRAFTING\998 INSTRUMENTATION\998-I403.DWG 4/23/2021 MPJ DCL MPJ 00/00/0000 0
SERVICE PERSONNEL.

ENTRY ONLY BY AUTHORIZED
BURN HAZARD. CABINET
ELECTRICAL SHOCK AND ! DANGER
PANEL.

PERSONNEL SHOULD ENTER THIS

ONLY AUTHORIZED AND QUALIFIED
AND INTERNAL SOURCES.

POWER FROM SEVERAL EXTERNAL

MULTIPLE VOLTAGE SOURCES
THIS PANEL CONTAINS ELECTRICAL ! WARNING

PANEL LABEL

PANEL LABELS

BACKPANEL LAYOUT VIEW
101
I402

PANEL FRONT VIEW

PANEL TOP VIEW

PANEL SIDE VIEW

36.00" 12.00"

32.69"

44.69"
102
I402
102
I404
102
I403
TYP
102
I405
102
I406
1630
0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES:
1/2" = HALF SCALE

ORIGINAL
CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO.

REVISIONS
SKM ENGINEERING INC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH
DRAWING NO.

SHEET CITY OF BANNING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUALIZATION BASIN 533 W 2600 S, Suite 25
Bountiful, Utah 84010
Phone: (801) 677-0011
www.skmeng.com
I404IO SCHEDULE INSTRUMENTATION - PLC DRAWINGS
C:\USERS\MICHAEL.JOHNSON\AQUA ENGINEERING\CITY OF BANNING - 001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\050 DRAFTING\998 INSTRUMENTATION\998-I404.DWG 4/23/2021 MPJ DCL MPJ 00/00/0000 0

IO SCHEDULE
1631

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.

9. 11.

12. 13.

10. 14.

THE COMPLETED INSTALLATION SHALL COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE

FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL CODES, ORDINANCES, AND
REGULATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN NECESSARY

PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. ALL WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED IN A NEAT,

WORKMANLIKE MANNER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST NEC
STANDARDS OF INSTALLATION UNDER COMPETENT SUPERVISION.

INSTALL GROUNDING PER NEC.

VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO BIDDING TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH

EXISTING CONDITIONS AND OTHER FACTORS, WHICH MAY AFFECT THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK. INCLUDE ALL RELATED COSTS IN THE INITIAL BID PROPOSAL.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WORK WITH THE UTILITIES

PROVIDING SERVICES ON THIS PROJECT, AND SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL THEIR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS.

ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE NEW AND OF THE BEST QUALITY,

MANUFACTURED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEMA, ANSI, UL, OR OTHER APPLICABLE STANDARDS. THE USE OF MANUFACTURERS' NAMES,

MODELS, AND NUMBERS IS INTENDED TO ESTABLISH STYLE,
QUALITY, APPEARANCE, USEFULNESS, AND BID PRICE.

PROTECT ALL ELECTRICAL MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT INSTALLED

AGAINST DAMAGE BY OTHER TRADES, WEATHER CONDITIONS, OR
ANY OTHER PREVENTABLE CAUSES. EQUIPMENT DAMAGED DURING

SHIPPING OR CONSTRUCTION, PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE
ENGINEER OR THE OWNER, WILL BE REJECTED AS DEFECTIVE.

LEAVE THE SITE CLEAN. REMOVE ALL DEBRIS, EMPTY CARTONS,

TOOLS, CONDUIT, WIRE SCRAPS AND ALL MISCELLANEOUS SPARE

EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS USED IN THE WORK DURING
CONSTRUCTION. ALL COMPONENTS SHALL BE FREE OF DUST, GRIT

AND FOREIGN MATERIALS, LEFT AS NEW BEFORE FINAL
ACCEPTANCE OF WORK. DAMAGED PAINT AND FINISHES SHALL BE

TOUCHED UP OR REPAINTED WITH MATCHING COLOR PAINT AND
FINISH.

CIRCUIT CONDUCTORS #6 AWG OR SMALLER SHALL BE THWN
STRANDED COPPER. #4 AWG THROUGH #2 AWG SHALL BE XHHW
STRANDED COPPER. #1 AWG OR LARGER SHALL BE XHHW-2
STRANDED COPPER. MINIMUM POWER CONDUCTOR SIZE SHALL BE
#12 AWG WITH #12 AWG GROUND. ALL WIRE TO BE SIZED PER NEC TABLE 316-10, 75° C BASED ON A 30° C AMBIENT.

UNDERGROUND CONDUITS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC. MINIMUM
CONDUIT DEPTH SHALL BE 24 INCHES. MINIMUM UNDERGROUND
CONDUIT SIZE SHALL BE 1 INCH.

MINIMUM CONDUIT DEPTH UNDER SLAB SHALL BE 1 INCH.

CONDUITS SHALL BE MARKED AT EACH END WITH MATCHING
NUMBERED BRASS OR NYLON TAGS. SPARE CONDUITS SHALL HAVE A PULL STRING INSTALLED AND SECURED.

EXPOSED CONDUITS SHALL BE GALVANIZED RIGID STEEL (GRS).

MINIMUM SIZE 3/4 INCH, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS.

SAFETY SWITCHES, ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT,

CONTROL PANELS, AND OTHER ELECTRICAL DEVICES SHALL BE UL LISTED, AND RATED FOR HEAVY DUTY SERVICE.

WIRING DEVICES SHALL BE SPECIFICATION GRADE.

THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MANAGING, SCHEDULING,

DOCUMENTING, AND PERFORMING THE WORK SO THAT A COMPLETE

ELECTRICAL, INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL SYSTEM FOR THE
FACILITY IS PROVIDED. ACCURATE SHOP AND RECORD DRAWINGS,

AND OEM MANUALS SHALL BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FINAL
ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK.

TYPICAL DETAILS SHALL APPLY IN ALL CASES, WHETHER
SPECIFICALLY REFERRED TO OR NOT.

REFER TO SPECIFICATION 260533 "RACEWAYS AND BOXES FOR
ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS" FOR CONDUIT SPACING AND ROUTING
REQUIREMENTS.

TRANSFORMER

SCHEMATIC LINETYPES

MANUFACTURER/SHOP WIRE

TYPICALLY INSTALLED OFF-SITE

FIELD/CONTRACTOR

INSTALLED WIRE

EXISTING OR FUTURE

FIELD/CONTRACTOR

INSTALLED WIRE

EXISTING OR FUTURE

MANUFACTURER/SHOP WIRE

SCHEMATIC SYMBOLS

DEVICE CONNECTION

LUG OR TERMINAL

SCHEMATIC POINT OF

CONNECTION

TRIP RATING

BREAKER TYPE

AMPERE RATING

NEMA RATING

AMPERE RATING

FUSE TYPE

CIRCUIT BREAKER

DISCONNECT
FUSE

FUSED DISCONNECT

AMPERE RATING

FUSE TYPE

AMPERE RATING

NEMA RATING

POWER STABS BUS

CONNECTION

POWER STABS LOAD CONNECTION

MOTOR OVERLOAD RELAY

SOLENOID VALVE

NORMALLY CLOSED CONTACT

NORMALLY OPEN CONTACT

MOTOR, NUMBER

DESIGNATES NEMA

HORSEPOWER SIZE

CURRENT TRANSFORMER

CT TURNS RATIO
3 NUMBER OF CT'S
100:5

METER TYPE DESIGNATION

NUMBER OF PT'S

POTENTIAL TRANSFORMER
3 480:120

MOTOR STARTER,

CONTACTOR, RELAY OR

TIMER COIL
M
AM = AMMETER
SSM = SOLID STATE METER
UM = UTILITY METER
VM = VOLTMETER
WHM = WATT HOUR METER
WM = WATT METER

METERING EQUIPMENT

PT VOLTAGE RATIO
UM

GENERATOR

NEMA RATING

AMPERE RATING

MANUAL OR AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH
3R
600A

TRANSIENT VOLTAGE SURGE SUPRESSOR

CLASS C TVSS CLASSIFICATION
TVSS

FULL VOLTAGE NON-REVERSING STARTER (FVNR)

STARTER TYPE AND SIZE
NEMA
1 SIZE

STARTER TYPE AND SIZE

FULL VOLTAGE REVERSING STARTER (FVR)
SIZE
1 NEMA

TWO-SPEED STARTER

NEMA STARTER TYPE AND SIZE SIZE
1 LOAD REACTOR

VFD VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE

HF HARMONIC FILTER
LR

REDUCED VOLTAGE SOFT

STARTER RVSS

ELECTRICAL BUS

EXISTING OR FUTURE

ELECTRICAL BUS
2 POSITION SELECTOR SWITCH
POSITION LEGEND: X=CLOSED
O=OPEN
3 POSITION SELECTOR

SWITCH HAND - OFF - AUTO
POSITION LEGEND:

X=CLOSED O=OPEN

NORMALLY CLOSED PUSH BUTTON
3 POSITION SELECTOR SWITCH

OPEN - CLOSE - AUTO POSITION
LEGEND: X=CLOSED O=OPEN

NORMALLY OPEN PUSH
BUTTON
3 POSITION SELECTOR SWITCH

FORWARD - OFF - REVERSE
POSITION LEGEND: X=CLOSED
O=OPEN

GROUND CONNECTION

TIMER RELAY CONTACT

NORMALLY OPEN TIME DELAY
CLOSE

EQUIPMENT

PROGRAMMING

CONSOLE

FLOAT SWITCH - MAKE ON FALL

PILOT LIGHT
LETTER INDICATES COLOR R=RED,
A=AMBER, B=BLUE, G=GREEN

TYPICAL SWITCH CONFIGURATION

FLOAT SWITCH - MAKE ON RISE

FLOAT SWITCH - BREAK ON FALL

FLOAT SWITCH - BREAK ON RISE

SWITCH TYPE SYMBOL (SEE BELOW)

LEVEL SWITCH

PRESSURE SWITCH

FLOW OR TORQUE SWITCH

TEMPERATURE SWITCH

LIMIT SWITCH

ELAPSED TIME METER

CONTROL RELAY

TIME DELAY RELAY

ALARM RELAY

ABBREVIATIONS NOTES

INSTANTANEOUS

SHORT-CIRCUIT TRIP DEVICE

TIME OVERCURRENT TRIP
DEVICE

GROUND FAULT TRIP DEVICE
ETM
CR
TD
AR
50 51
51G
R
FRAME SIZE 5

15. OFF ON
XO
H OA
XOO
O CA
XOO
F OR
XOO
STOP
START
NOTC
100AF
50AT
MCP
30A
4X
30A
4X
30A
R
30A
R

EXPOSED CONDUIT

UNDERGROUND

CONDUIT

EXISTING OR FUTURE

UNDERGROUND

CONDUIT

EXISTING OR FUTURE

EXPOSED CONDUIT

EXISTING OR FUTURE

ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT

BARE COPPER GROUND

CONDUCTOR

DEMOLITION

CAPPED UNDERGROUND

CONDUIT

ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT

GROUPED CONDUIT AND

CIRCUIT IDENTIFICATION
TAGS. REFER TO THE

POWER ONE-LINE AND

CONTROL ONE-LINE

DIAGRAMS OR CONDUIT

SCHEDULES FOR CONDUIT
SIZES AND CONTENTS.

C-CONTROL/INSTRUMENTATION

P-POWER

F-FIBER OPTIC/NETWORK

SP-SPARE CONDUITS

CONDUIT CALLOUT

CONDUIT SEALOFF

LTC CONNECTION

MC CONNECTION

QUADRAPLEX RECEPTACLE

DUPLEX RECEPTACLE

GROUND ROD

SINGLE POLE SWITCH

DATA JACK

ELECTRICAL PLAN LINETYPES

SITE PLAN DEVICES
X X= (SEE BELOW)
AE
AIT
FE
FIT
FS
J
JS
LE
LIT
LS
M
MH
MV
PB
PIT
PS
PT
SV
TS
WE
WIT
ZS
- ANALYZER ELEMENT
- ALALYZING INDICATING TRANSMITTER
- FLOW ELEMENT
- FLOW INDICATING TRANSMITTER
- FLOW SWITCH
- JUNCTION BOX
- TORQUE SWITCH
- LEVEL ELEMENT
- LEVEL INDICATING TRANSMITTER
- LEVEL SWITCH
- MOTOR
- MANHOLE
- MOTOR OPERATED VALVE
- PULLBOX
- PRESSURE INDICATING TRANSMITTER
- PRESSURE SWITCH
- PRESSURE TRANSMITTER
- SOLENOID VALVE
- TEMPERATURE SWITCH
- WEIGHT ELEMENT
- WEIGHT INDICATING TRANSMITTER
- LIMIT SWITCH

WP DENOTES RECEPTACLE TYPE
(BLANK) = STANDARD INDOORS
GFCI = GND FLT CURRENT INT.

WP = WEATHER PROOF & GFCI
S3 3-WAY SWITCH
S4 4-WAY SWITCH

DISCONNECT SWITCH

T THERMOSTAT

CONDUIT HOME RUN NUMBER

INDICATES QUANTITY OF

CONDUCTORS INCLUDING
GROUND
3 DETAIL CALLOUT

FIELD INSTRUMENT CALLOUT
ELEC. PLAN SYMBOLS

EQUIPMENT CALLOUT
DESCRIPTOR #1
DESCRIPTOR #3
DESCRIPTOR #2
EQUIP. TAG

TB'S & PLC SYMBOLS

TERMINAL LABEL

LOCAL PANEL OR DEVICE TERMINAL BLOCK

PLC PANEL TERMINAL BLOCK

MCC TERMINAL BLOCK

DISCRETE INPUT LABEL

PLC DISCRETE INPUT

DISCRETE OUTPUT LABEL

PLC DISCRETE OUTPUT (NORMALLY OPEN)

ANALOG INPUT LABEL

PLC ANALOG INPUT

ANALOG OUTPUT LABEL

PLC ANALOG OUTPUT

EQUIPMENT CALLOUT

DISCRETE OUTPUT LABEL

PLC DISCRETE OUTPUT (NORMALLY CLOSED)

RTD LABEL

PLC RTD
100
TYP
FE
101
CXXX
PXXX
FXXX
SPXXX
DIXX
DOXX
DOXX
AIXX
AOXX
RTDXX
X
X
X
X

DEVICE TERMINAL BLOCK

TERMINAL LABEL

TERMINAL LABEL

TERMINAL LABEL

ELECTRICAL PLAN HAZARDOUS LOCATION

CLASSIFICATION LINETYPES
AMPERE

ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR

ANALOG INPUT

AMPS INTERRUPTING CAPACITY

ANALOG OUTPUT

AIR SUPPLY

AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH

CONDUIT

CIRCUIT BREAKER

CHLORINE

CONTROL POWER TRANSFORMER

COMMUNICATIONS TERMINATION CABINET

COPPER, BARE

CONTROL VALVE

DISTRIBUTED CONTROL SYSTEM

DISCRETE INPUT

DISCRETE OUTPUT

DISTRIBUTION PANEL

DISCONNECT SWITCH

DIFFERENTIAL VOLTAGE/TIME

DRAWING

ELAPSED TIME METER

ELECTRONIC OVERLOAD

FLOW ELEMENT

FULL LOAD AMPS

FIBER OPTIC CABLE

FORWARD-OFF-REVERSE

FLOW SWITCH

FULL VOLTAGE NON-REVERSING

GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER

GROUND FAULT PROTECTION
GROUND

GALLONS PER MINUTE

GALVANIZED RIGID STEEL

HYDROGEN SULFIDE

HANDHOLE

HUMAN MACHINE INTERFACE

HAND-OFF-AUTO

HAND-OFF-REMOTE

CURRENT

INSTRUMENTATION CABLE

INPUT/OUTPUT

SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT

JUNCTION BOX

LOCAL AREA NETWORK

LOCAL CONTROL PANEL

LOCK-OUT-STOP

LIGHTING PANEL

LOCAL/REMOTE

LEVEL SWITCH

LIQUIDTIGHT FLEXIBLE METAL CONDUIT
MOTOR

MANUAL/AUTO, MILLIAMP

MANUFACTURER'S CABLE

MAIN CIRCUIT BREAKER

MOTOR CONTROL CENTER

MOTOR CIRCUIT PROTECTOR

MANUFACTURER(S)

MILLION GALLONS PER DAY

MANHOLE

MOTOR OPERATED VALVE

MASTER TELEMETRY UNIT

NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE

NORMALLY OPEN TIMED CLOSED

NON-POTABLE WATER

NOT TO SCALE

TURBIDITY

OPERATOR INTERFACE TERMINAL

OVERLOAD

ON/OFF (MAINTAINED)

OFF-REMOTE

PULL BOX

PERSONAL COMPUTER

PHASE/POWER FAILURE RELAY

PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROLLER
PANEL

PARTS PER MILLION
PAIR

PRESSURE

PRESSURE SWITCH

POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH

PROCESS VARIABLE

REMOTE CONTROL PANEL

RADIO FREQUENCY

REMOTE INPUT OUTPUT
RESET

RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE DETECTOR

REMOTE TELEMETRY UNIT

REDUCED VOLTAGE SOFT STARTER

SERVICE ENTRANCE EQUIPMENT

SERVICE ENTRANCE SECTION

START-LOCK-OFF-STOP

SUBMERSIBLE MANUFACTURER CABLE

SULFUR DIOXIDE

SET POINT/SPARE

SURGE PROTECTION DEVICE

START/STOP

SHUNT TRIP

TELEPHONE CABLE

TEMPERATURE SWITCH

TYPICAL

UNDERGROUND
VOLT

VOLTAMP

VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE

WATT, WIRE

WEATHERPROOF

TRANSFORMER

POSITION SWITCH
A
AFF
AI
AIC
AO
AS
ATS
C
CB
CL2
CPT
CTC
CU
CV
DCS
DI
DO
DP
DS
DV/DT
DWG
ETM
EOL
FE
FLA
FOC
FOR
FS
FVNR
GFCI
GFP
GND
GPM
GRS
H2S
HH
HMI
HOA
HOR
I
IC
IO
ISC
J
LAN
LCP
LOS
LP
LR
LS
LTC
M
MA
MC
MCB
MCC
MCP
MFR(S)
MGD
MH
MOV
MTU
NEC
NOTC
NPW
NTS
NTU
OIT
OL
OO
OR
PB
PC
PFR
PLC
PNL
PPM
PR
P
PS
PSI
PV
RCP
RF
RIO
RST
RTD
RTU
RVSS
SEQ
SES
SLOS
SMC
SO2
SP
SPD
SS
ST
TC
TS
TYP
UG
V
VA
VFD
W
WP
XFMR
ZS
S
C1D1 CLASS I DIV 1
C1D2 CLASS I DIV 2
C2D1 CLASS II DIV 1
C2D2 CLASS II DIV 2
E E
E E

CONDUIT DUCTBANK

EXISTING OR FUTURE

CONDUIT DUCTBANK
0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES:
1/2" = HALF SCALE

ORIGINAL
CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO.

REVISIONS
SKM ENGINEERING INC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH
DRAWING NO.

SHEET CITY OF BANNING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUALIZATION BASIN 533 W 2600 S, Suite 25
Bountiful, Utah 84010
Phone: (801) 677-0011
www.skmeng.com
E001NOTES & SYMBOLS ELECTRICAL - GENERAL
C:\USERS\MICHAEL.JOHNSON\AQUA ENGINEERING\CITY OF BANNING - 001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\050 DRAFTING\999 ELECTRICAL\999-E001.DWG 4/25/2021 MPJ DCL MPJ 00/00/0000 0
1632
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E

E E E E
E
Scale in Feet
0 20 40

EQUALIZATION BASIN SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1:20

CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR

SUBMITTING CONDUIT DETAILS AND A CONDUIT

ROUTING PLAN TO THE ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
FOR APPROVAL.

LIMIT EXPOSED CONDUITS, 90° BENDS, AND
WALL PENETRATIONS. MAINTAIN SEPARATION

BETWEEN SIGNAL AND POWER-CARRYING
CONDUITS. ALL EXPOSED CONDUIT SHALL BE
PVC COATED.

UTILIZE EXISTING PULL BOXES WHERE

POSSIBLE FOR CONDUIT DUCTBANK TO

EQUALIZATION BASIN ELECTRICAL ROOM
NOTES

ELECTRICAL LEGEND
12 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES:
1/2" = HALF SCALE

ORIGINAL
CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO.

REVISIONS
SKM ENGINEERING INC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH
DRAWING NO.

SHEET CITY OF BANNING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUALIZATION BASIN 533 W 2600 S, Suite 25
Bountiful, Utah 84010
Phone: (801) 677-0011
www.skmeng.com
E101EQUALIZATION BASIN SITE PLAN ELECTRICAL - SITE
C:\USERS\MICHAEL.JOHNSON\AQUA ENGINEERING\CITY OF BANNING - 001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\050 DRAFTING\999 ELECTRICAL\999-E101.DWG 5/6/2021 MPJ DCL MPJ 00/00/0000 0
3 202
E902
TYP
023
E902
TYP

SWBD-MS
PB-5
PB-4
PB-3
PB-2
PB-1
1633
Scale in Feet
0 4 8

EQUALIZATION BASIN & PUMP STATION PLAN
SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"

THE INTERIOR OF THE EQ BASIN AND
EXTENDING OUT 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY AND

1.5 FEET VERTICALLY IS RATED CLASS I, DIV2
(SEE NFPA 820 FIGURE A.5.2). IN THIS

CLASSIFIED AREA, ALL ELECTRICAL
COMPONENTS SHALL BE RATED CLASS I, DIV 2.

SEAL OFFS SHALL BE UTILIZED PER THE
REQUIREMENTS OF NEC. FOR THE

UNCLASSIFIED SPACE SURROUNDING THIS

AREA, ALL COMPONENTS SHALL BE

CORROSION RESISTANT AND PANELS SHALL BE
316SS NEMA 4X. ALL EXPOSED CONDUITS AND
FITTINGS SHALL BE PVC COATED GRS. ALL

CHANNEL, ANCHORS, FASTENERS AND
ASSOCIATED HARDWARE SHALL BE 316SS.

CONDUIT SHALL ONLY RUN EXPOSED WHERE
NECESSARY.

CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR

SUBMITTING CONDUIT DETAILS AND A CONDUIT

ROUTING PLAN TO THE ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
FOR APPROVAL.

LIMIT EXPOSED CONDUITS, 90° BENDS, AND
WALL PENETRATIONS. MAINTAIN SEPARATION

BETWEEN SIGNAL AND POWER-CARRYING
CONDUITS.

NOTES

ELECTRICAL LEGEND
123
0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES:
1/2" = HALF SCALE

ORIGINAL
CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO.

REVISIONS
SKM ENGINEERING INC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH
DRAWING NO.

SHEET CITY OF BANNING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUALIZATION BASIN 533 W 2600 S, Suite 25
Bountiful, Utah 84010
Phone: (801) 677-0011
www.skmeng.com
E201EQUALIZATION BASIN & PUMP STATION PLAN ELECTRICAL - LAYOUT C:\USERS\MICHAEL.JOHNSON\AQUA ENGINEERING\CITY OF BANNING - 001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\050 DRAFTING\999 ELECTRICAL\999-E201.DWG 5/5/2021 MPJ DCL MPJ 00/00/0000 0

TIPPING BUCKETS
(TYP OF 4)
(OPTIONAL)

EQ BASIN PUMPS
(TYP OF 3)
CLASS I DIV 2
AREA
1 P-11202
P-11201
P-11203
LSH
11091
LSL
11150
LSH
11191
LSL
11150
LE
11090
LE
11190
FE
11210
ZS
11101
ZS
11102
ZS
11111
ZS
11112
LCP-11101 LCP-11111

BOND TO

BUILDING GROUND
503
E903
TYP 504
E903
TYP
551
E903
TYP
365
E902
TYP

CLASSIFIED BOUNDARY
10' FROM BASIN EDGE
1634
Scale in Feet
0 2 4

EQUALIZATION BASIN ELECTRICAL ROOM PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"

CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR

SUBMITTING CONDUIT DETAILS AND A CONDUIT

ROUTING PLAN TO THE ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
FOR APPROVAL.

LIMIT EXPOSED CONDUITS, 90° BENDS, AND
WALL PENETRATIONS. MAINTAIN SEPARATION

BETWEEN SIGNAL AND POWER-CARRYING
CONDUITS.

CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL (2) 10'X3/4"Ø
COPPER GROUND RODS 10' MINIMUM SPACING
AND 10' MINIMUM FROM BUILDING.

NOTES
12 0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES:
1/2" = HALF SCALE

ORIGINAL
CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO.

REVISIONS
SKM ENGINEERING INC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH
DRAWING NO.

SHEET CITY OF BANNING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUALIZATION BASIN 533 W 2600 S, Suite 25
Bountiful, Utah 84010
Phone: (801) 677-0011
www.skmeng.com
E202EQUALIZATION BASIN ELECTRICAL ROOM PLAN ELECTRICAL - LAYOUT C:\USERS\MICHAEL.JOHNSON\AQUA ENGINEERING\CITY OF BANNING - 001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\050 DRAFTING\999 ELECTRICAL\999-E202.DWG 5/3/2021 MPJ DCL MPJ 00/00/0000 0

ELECTRICAL LEGEND
H.E. WILLIAMS 39W 1'X4' LED FIXTURE WITH
EMERGENCY AND DIMMING DRIVERS. MODEL
ATS1-14-L40/840-D-EM/10WLP-DIM-UNV OR

APPROVED EQUAL
T

DUPLEX OUTLET
G: GFCI PROTECTED OUTLET
WP: WEATHER-PROOF OUTLET GFCI
PROTECTED.

THERMOSTAT
SWITCH
L10

PHILIPS GARDCO
121-16L-1000-CW-G4-4-UNV-PCB-BZ 55W
5476 LUMENS LED WALL SCONCE, TYPE 4

DARK BRONZE, WITH BUILT IN PHOTO
CELL OPERATION. OR APPROVED EQUAL
EXIT CHLORIDE VE SERIES EXIT SIGN. MODEL
VEGW OR APPROVED EQUAL.

L1
WP WP
WP WP
L10B
A
C
C
AA
C
L1 L1
MCC-EQ
HVAC
AIR

HANDLING
UNIT
PLC-EQ
FIT-11210
EXIT
T
100
E901
TYP
140
E901
TYP
3 3
800
E903
TYP
002
E901
TYP
400
E902
TYP
810
E903
TYP
LIT-11090
LIT-11190
1635
20" 25"
135"
90"
20"

MCC-EQ ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
1A
1G
2A
25"
3A 4A 5A
5C
5G
5I
5E
5B
6A
6G
25" 20" 20"
0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES:
1/2" = HALF SCALE

ORIGINAL
CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO.

REVISIONS
SKM ENGINEERING INC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH
DRAWING NO.

SHEET CITY OF BANNING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUALIZATION BASIN 533 W 2600 S, Suite 25
Bountiful, Utah 84010
Phone: (801) 677-0011
www.skmeng.com
E501SWBD-MS & MCC-EQ ELECTRICAL - POWER DISTRIBUTION
C:\USERS\MICHAEL.JOHNSON\AQUA ENGINEERING\CITY OF BANNING - 001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\050 DRAFTING\999 ELECTRICAL\999-E501.DWG 5/3/2021 MPJ DCL MPJ 00/00/0000 0

EXISTING

UTILITY

TRANSFORMER
12kV
FROM

UTILITY
UM
3000AF
2400AT
M
PQM

EXISTING

UTILITY METERING
& MAIN BREAKER EXISTING MAIN SERVICE SWITCHBOARD SWBD-MS, 480VAC, 3Ø, 4W, 60HZ, 3000A BUS, 65KAIC, RMS SYMM. 1 800AF
400AT
2 800AF
600AT
3 SPARE
(1200AF)
4 SPARE
(1200AF)
5 6
100AF
15AT
120/240V
3W, 5kVA

XFMR-LP-MS
LP-MS
SPD
400A
3P
400A
GROUND
GRID

EXISTING

STANDBY GENERATOR

EXISTING
ATS

EXISTING

MCC BREAKER

SWBD-MS (EXISTING) ONELINE DIAGRAM
MCC-EQ, 480VAC, 3Ø, 600A HORIZONTAL BUS, 65kAIC, NEMA 1 800AF
400AT
2A
100AF
100AT
50 P-11201

EQ BASIN
PUMP 1
LR
VFD
3A
100AF
100AT
50 P-11202

EQ BASIN
PUMP 2
LR
VFD
4A
100AF
100AT
50 P-11203

EQ BASIN
PUMP 3
LR
VFD

TO EXISTING
MCC-1, 2, & 3

TO EXISTING
MCC-3M
800AF
400AT
6A
100AF
20AT
120/240V
3W, 10kVA

XFMR-LP-MS
LP-EQ
SPD

MCC-EQ ONELINE DIAGRAM
1A
PER
MFR
SPD
1G
6G
5A 5B 5C 5E 5G 5I
SPARE
1636
0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES:
1/2" = HALF SCALE

ORIGINAL
CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO.

REVISIONS
SKM ENGINEERING INC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH
DRAWING NO.

SHEET CITY OF BANNING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUALIZATION BASIN 533 W 2600 S, Suite 25
Bountiful, Utah 84010
Phone: (801) 677-0011
www.skmeng.com
E601VFD SCHEMATIC ELECTRICAL - POWER DISTRIBUTION
C:\USERS\MICHAEL.JOHNSON\AQUA ENGINEERING\CITY OF BANNING - 001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\050 DRAFTING\999 ELECTRICAL\999-E601.DWG 4/25/2021 MPJ DCL MPJ 00/00/0000 0
TYPICAL FOR: P-11201, P-11202, P-11203
L3

SPEED POT
KEYPAD
480V/3P/60HZ
L1 L2 M
0-300 SEC
POWER

ON-DELAY
TIMER
TD1
ETMGA

FAILURE
ALARM
CR1
AR1
RUN
CRH
CRR
480V
120V
CPT
FAN
L1 L2 L3
COMMON
HAND
DI01
T1 T2 T3
H
6 O
R
XOO
OOX
LINE

REACTOR

KEYPAD SHALL BE

MOUNTED ON PANEL

DOOR WITH PILOT

DEVICES
CB
3P
TD1
RUN
FAIL

WHEN THE HOR SWITCH IS IN THE HAND POSITION, THE MOTOR SHOULD RUN, WHEN

THE HOR SWITCH IS IN THE OFF POSITION, THE MOTOR SHOULD STOP AND WHEN THE HOR SWITCH IS IN THE REMOTE POSITION, THE MOTOR IS CONTROLLED BY THE PLC.

THE PLC WILL BE ABLE TO MONITOR WHETHER THE HOR IS IN THE HAND OR REMOTE POSITION.

WHEN THE HOR SWITCH IS IN THE HAND POSITION, THE SPEED COMMAND COMES FROM THE POTENTIOMETER. WHEN IN THE REMOTE POSITION, THE SPEED COMMAND COMES FROM THE PLC.

CRH
RESET

TYPICAL SCHEMATIC DIAGRAMS ARE INTENDED TO REFLECT THE GENERAL CONTROL STRATEGY. ACTUAL CIRCUITRY MAY VARY FOR SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT SUPPLIED. THE

NUMBER AND TYPE OF DEVICES SHALL BE FURNISHED AS REQUIRED FOR PROPER OPERATION OF THE EQUIPMENT.

CONTROL POWER TRANSFORMERS (CPT) SHALL BE ADEQUATELY SIZED AND SHALL BE

PROVIDED WITH PROPERLY SIZED FUSES FOR BOTH THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY WINDINGS.

FUSES SHALL BE ADEQUATELY SIZED PER THE EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.

ADJUST TIME DELAY RELAYS PRIOR TO STARTUP. STAGGER TIMER SETTINGS FOR POWER ON-DELAY RELAYS.

CONTROL SWITCHES SHALL BE DOOR MOUNTED ON THEIR RESPECTIVE PANELS.

DEVICES SHALL BE RATED FOR LINE VOLTAGE AND 125% OF LOAD CURRENT.

LOCAL CONTROLS SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO P&ID'S AND NOT NECESSARILY AS SHOWN ON SCHEMATICS. SEE LCP SCHEMATICS AND CONDUIT SCHEDULE FOR EXACT WIRING.
123456
-+
SPEED

COMMAND
4-20mA

FROM PLC
-+
SPEED

INDICATION
4-20mA
TO PLC

FAILURE
ALARM
RUN
COMMON
CR1
AR1
REMOTE

HOR TO PLC
OOX

HIGH TEMP
ALARM
A
TSH
AR2
TD2
CR2
AR2
CR2
TD2 A
AR3
TD3
CR3
AR3
CR3
TD3

DISCHARGE PRESSURE

HIGH ALARM
PSH
TEMP
ALARM
AR2

MOISTURE
ALARM
AR3
1637
0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES:
1/2" = HALF SCALE

ORIGINAL
CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO.

REVISIONS
SKM ENGINEERING INC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH
DRAWING NO.

SHEET CITY OF BANNING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUALIZATION BASIN 533 W 2600 S, Suite 25
Bountiful, Utah 84010
Phone: (801) 677-0011
www.skmeng.com
E701CALCULATIONS & SCHEDULES ELECTRICAL - POWER DISTRIBUTION C:\USERS\MICHAEL.JOHNSON\AQUA ENGINEERING\CITY OF BANNING - 001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\050 DRAFTING\999 ELECTRICAL\999-E701.DWG 5/5/2021 MPJ DCL MPJ 00/00/0000 0

MCC-EQ CALCULATIONS

LP-EQ PANEL SCHEDULE

SWBD-MS CALCULATIONS
INSTRUMENT SCHEDULE 1638
0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES:
1/2" = HALF SCALE

ORIGINAL
CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO.

REVISIONS
SKM ENGINEERING INC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH
DRAWING NO.

SHEET CITY OF BANNING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUALIZATION BASIN 533 W 2600 S, Suite 25
Bountiful, Utah 84010
Phone: (801) 677-0011
www.skmeng.com
E801CONDUIT DEVELOPMENT ELECTRICAL - POWER DISTRIBUTION C:\USERS\MICHAEL.JOHNSON\AQUA ENGINEERING\CITY OF BANNING - 001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\050 DRAFTING\999 ELECTRICAL\999-E801.DWG 5/3/2021 MPJ DCL MPJ 00/00/0000 0

SWBD-MS
P001
SP001

MCC-EQ LP-EQ (INSIDE MCC-EQ)
P006 P-11202
P005 P-11201
P007 P-11203P003
LIT
11190 S002
P002
LIT
11090 S001
P004
FIT
11210 S003
LE
11090
LE
11190
FE
11210
HH-1
S001AS002AS003A
S001+
PLC-EQ
LSH
11091
C001
LSL
11150
C002
LSH
11191
C003
LSL
11050
C004
C006

CONDUIT DEVELOPMENT

CONDUIT SCHEDULE
P008
LCP-11101
C005 P009
P010
C011
ZS
11101
C012
ZS
11102
C013
ZS
11113
C014
ZS
11114
C007C008C009C010
ZS
11101
ZS
11102
ZS
11113
ZS
11114
P011
P012P013P014
LCP-11111
1639
0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES:
1/2" = HALF SCALE

ORIGINAL
CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO.

REVISIONS
SKM ENGINEERING INC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH
DRAWING NO.

SHEET CITY OF BANNING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUALIZATION BASIN 533 W 2600 S, Suite 25
Bountiful, Utah 84010
Phone: (801) 677-0011
www.skmeng.com
E901DETAILS 1 ELECTRICAL - DETAILS
C:\USERS\MICHAEL.JOHNSON\AQUA ENGINEERING\CITY OF BANNING - 001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\050 DRAFTING\999 ELECTRICAL\999-E901.DWG 4/25/2021 MPJ DCL MPJ 00/00/0000 0
2 1
SCALE: NONE
1 2
1 72"±

CONDUIT PER

DRAWING

REQUIREMENTS
002
TYP

CONCRETE

HOUSEKEEPING
PAD
420
TYP
S.S. PANEL OR

AS REQUIRED BY

DRAWINGS
STAINLESS STEEL 1-5/8" X 1-5/8" UNISTRUT
CHANNEL.
1 2" X 3" S.S. ANCHOR BOLT OR LAG BOLT WITH
WASHER, ANCHORED TO WALL (EVERY 18", 2 MIN.)
MAXIMUM PANEL HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 72".

CENTER OF INSTRUMENT DISPLAYS SHALL BE 62".

CENTER OF LOCAL CONTROL STATIONS SHALL BE 48".
3 4
5 ELECTRICAL PANEL MOUNTING DETAIL
SCALE: NONE
4 - 1/2" x 4"

STAINLESS STEEL

ANCHOR BOLTS

POST BASE, STAINLESS STEEL,

AS MANUFACTURED

BY UNISTRUT OR EQUAL

U-CHANNEL,

AS MANUFACTURED

BY UNISTRUT OR EQUAL

DOUBLE STAINLESS STEEL

U-CHANNEL, AS MANUFACTURED

BY UNISTRUT OR EQUAL

SHALLOW U-CHANNEL,

AS MANUFACTURED

BY UNISTRUT OR EQUAL

JUNCTION BOX,

LCP OR OUTLET

MYERS HUB

OR EQUAL

CONDUIT CLAMP
001
TYP
321
TYP

PULLING EYE FLOOR SLOPES

TO SUMP
NOTE:
3'-11" x 3'-11" x 4'-1" MINIMUM INSIDE DIMENSIONS.

INSTALL A GROUND ROD AND CONNECT TO DUCT BANK GROUND.

TRAIN CABLES AROUND INTERIOR PERIMETER ON CABLE RACKS.

SCALE: NONE

KNOCKOUT (TYP)
RISER
BASE
3'-0" x 3'-0" STEEL

TRAFFIC COVER OR

MANHOLE LID
COVER
021
TYP

JOINT SEAL

COMPOUND

GROUT ALL

CONDUIT ENTRIES

CAST IRON

COVER AND RING

FINISHED
GRADE
10" DIAMETER
SCHEDULE 80 PVC

GROUND ACCESS WELL

HARGER CATALOG
No. 360P36CILS80

OR EQUAL
SCALE: NONE
BARE

COPPER GROUND

CONDUCTOR
36"
27"
SLOT
10' X 3/4"Ø

COPPER CLAD

GROUNDING ROD

EXOTHERMIC
WELD
100
TYP
24"
4/0 BARE COPPER GROUND

CONDUCTOR
SCALE: NONE
NOTES:

DIMENSIONS ARE MINIMUM.

THE GROUND CONDUCTOR SHALL RUN CONTINUOUSLY THROUGH MANHOLES AND PULL

BOXES AND SHALL CONTINUE FROM THE DUCTBANK INTO THE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT OR BUILDING GROUNDING SYSTEM AND SHALL BE BONDED TO EACH RIDGID METAL CONDUIT.

BOND CONDUCTORS TO BE SOLID COPPER #10 AWG OR LARGER AS REQUIRED BY THE NEC.

ALL DUCTS OF THE SAME DUTY (480V POWER, 120V POWER, 120V CONTROLS, AND SIGNAL/FIBER) SHALL BE SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM OF 2".

SIGNAL AND FIBER DUCTS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM 480V POWER BY A MIN. OF 12", FROM 120V POWER BY A MIN. OF 6" AND FROM 120V CONTROL BY MIN. OF 4" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. 120V POWER AND 120V CONTROL DUCTS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM 480V POWER BY A MIN. OF 4" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS.

PVC CONDUIT(S)-SIZE

AND NUMBER AS REQUIRED

CLEAN BACKFILL
(TAMP TO 95% COMPACTION)

SAND BACKFILL
3"
3"
6"
3" WIDE DETECTABLE PLASTIC

MARKER TAPE WITH INSCRIPTION
"CAUTION ELECTRIC LINES BURIED BELOW"
(BLACK LETTERS ON RED BACKGROUND)

FINISHED GRADE
12"
200
TYP
1 2
3 4
3 3 4
4 NATIVE BACKFILL COMPACTED
TO 85% MAX. DRY DENSITY
PER ASHTO T-99
2'

CONDUIT

UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE

NATIVE BACKFILL COMPACTED
TO 85% MAX. DRY DENSITY
PER ASHTO T-99 OR

SELECT BEDDING COMPACTED TO
95% MAX. DRY DENSITY PER
ASHTO T-99

AS NEEDED
SCALE: NONE

METALLIC

MARKER TAPE

BURIED ELECTRICAL
2'

TOPSOIL

RESTORE TO ORIGINAL GRADE
201
TYP
NOTE:

ALL WORK SHALL BE PER NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE
AND LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY.

ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT

GROUND BUS OR LUG

GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR
(IN SCH. 80 PVC CONDUIT, WHERE

EXPOSED TO PHYSICAL DAMAGE)
20' (MIN)
SCALE: NONE
2" (MIN)
PVC
SCH. 80
SLEEVE

FINISHED
GRADE

BARE COPPER

CONDUCTOR

CONCRETE

FOUNDATION

OR FOOTING
140
TYP
1640
0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES:
1/2" = HALF SCALE

ORIGINAL
CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO.

REVISIONS
SKM ENGINEERING INC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH
DRAWING NO.

SHEET CITY OF BANNING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUALIZATION BASIN 533 W 2600 S, Suite 25
Bountiful, Utah 84010
Phone: (801) 677-0011
www.skmeng.com
E902DETAILS 2 ELECTRICAL - DETAILS
C:\USERS\MICHAEL.JOHNSON\AQUA ENGINEERING\CITY OF BANNING - 001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\050 DRAFTING\999 ELECTRICAL\999-E902.DWG 4/25/2021 MPJ DCL MPJ 00/00/0000 0

CONDUIT AS REQ'D

HANDHOLE COVER CABLE SUPPORT

CONDUIT BELL END

CONDUIT AS REQ'D
GROUT

JOINT SEAL COMPOUND
SCALE: NONE
023
TYP
SCALE: N.T.S.
202
TYP

A B B/D B A
A
B
B
4" MIN. TYP.
2" MIN. SEE NOTE 12
2" MIN. SEE NOTE 2
12" MIN. SEE NOTE 13
18" MAX. SEE NOTE 4
18" MIN. 30" MAX.
12"
C
NOTES:

ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE MINIMUM DIMENSIONS. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS.

ALL REBAR SHALL BE #4 BAR AND HAVE A MINIMUM CONCRETE
EMBEDMENT OF 2" (EDGE OF REBAR TO OUTSIDE SURFACE OF
CONCRETE).

REBAR HOOPS SHALL OVERLAP 9" MINIMUM AND SHALL BE PROVIDED EVERY 4 FEET HORIZONTALLY. HOOPS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED ON SINGLE ROW DUCTBANKS.

HORIZONTAL REBAR SHALL BE PLACED @ A MAXIMUM OF 18" ON

CENTER ALL AROUND THE DUCTBANK ENVELOPE AND SHALL BE
SUPPORTED EVERY 4 FEET LONGITUDINALLY. SINGLE ROW
DUCTBANKS LESS THAN 24" WIDE SHALL HAVE A MIN. OF 2
HORIZONTAL BARS.

DUCT SPACERS (SADDLES) SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR PROPER
SUPPORT OF CONDUIT DUCTS. SPACERS SHALL BE PROVIDED

HORIZONTALLY AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER AND TO

PREVENT ANY SAGGING OF THE DUCTS (LOW SPOTS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED).

DUCTS SHALL BE SECURED TO PREVENT FLOATING DURING THE
CONCRETE ENCASEMENT.

PROVIDE A 4/0 BARE CONTINUOUS COPPER GROUND. SEE
GROUNDING SPECIFICATION SECTION 16170.

DUCTBANK CONCRETE SHALL BE COLOR DYED RED BY MIXING 3 LBS.

IRON OXIDE PER CUBIC YARD OF CONCRETE.

ALL DUCTBANKS SHALL BE SLOPED @ 1/4" PER 10 FEET TO ALLOW DRAINAGE.

A 3" WIDE DETECTABLE PLASTIC MARKER TAPE WITH INSCRIPTION "CAUTION ELECTRICAL LINES BURIED BELOW" (BLACK LETTERS ON RED BACKGROUND) SHALL BE INSTALLED 12" ABOVE THE TOP OF ALL CONCRETE ENCASED DUCTBANKS.

REFER TO CONDUIT SCHEDULE FOR WIRE FILL OF ALL DUCTS.

ALL DUCTS OF THE SAME DUTY (480V POWER, 120V POWER, 120V CONTROLS, AND SIGNAL) SHALL BE SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM OF 2".

SIGNAL DUCTS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM 480V POWER BY A MIN. OF 12". SIGNAL DUCTS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM 120V POWER DUCTS BY 6" MIN. AND FROM 120V CONTROL BY MIN. OF 4" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS.

TYP
2 TYP
3 TYP
4 7

AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE NUMBER OF DUCTS SPECIFIED

DIMENSION TABLE
E
F
G

FINISHED GRADE
10 TYP
8 AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE NUMBER OF DUCTS SPECIFIED
B
A
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 2.

1. NOTES:

WHERE CONDUITS ARE INSTALLED IN OR UNDER A
CONCRETE SLAB, THE 24" DIMENSION DOES NOT APPLY.

CONDUITS SHALL BE INSTALLED BETWEEN REBAR MATS OR
UNDER A SINGLE REBAR MAT.

IN CORROSIVE AREAS, PVC COATED GRS SHALL BE USED.

FINISHED GRADE

PVC CONDUIT

PVC FEMALE ADAPTOR

PVC COATED

GRS COUPLING
24"
6" (MIN)

PVC COATED

GRS CONDUIT

PVC COATED

GRS NINETY

CONDUIT AS REQUIRED

COUPLING AS REQUIRED
320
TYP SCALE: NONE
INTO CONCRETE (4 PER POST BASE)

UNISTRUT CHANNEL

UNISTRUT CONDUIT STRAP

UNISTRUT POST BASE
3/8"x3-1/2" ANCHOR BOLT GROUTED
1 2
3 4

STAINLESS STEEL
3 4
1 2
350
TYP SCALE: NONE
2 1
3 STAINLESS STEEL
3 2
1 3/8"x3-1/2" ANCHOR BOLT GROUTED

UNISTRUT CONDUIT STRAP
UNISTRUT P1000 CHANNEL
INTO CONCRETE (1 PER FOOT 2 MINIMUM)
351
TYP SCALE: NONE
SCALE: NONE
C1005

SECURE TAGS TO CONDUIT

WITH NYLON CABLE TIES

ALMETEX TYPE TH

TAG HOLDER

ALMETEX TYPE

EZ-V TAG TITLES
(BLACK OR YELLOW)

CONDUIT
360
TYP
300
TYP SCALE: NONE

PVC SLEEVE

JOINT FILLER (URETHANE

EXPANDABLE FOAM)

CONDUIT

CAULK ENDS ALL

AROUND (TYPICAL)
SCALE: NONE
400
TYP

SIZE TO

EQUIPMENT
2"

FINISHED
FLOOR
#4 REBAR @ 24"

CENTERS
#4 REBAR @ 24"

CENTERS
3/4" CHAMFER
4"
4"
365
TYP SCALE: NONE

COUPLING

CONDUIT STRAP CONDUIT
36" MAXIMUM LENGTH

UNLESS APPROVED BY

ENGINEER

METAL CONNECTOR

PER SPECIFICATIONS

LIQUID TIGHT

FLEXIBLE CONDUIT

EQUIPMENT
1641
0 1/2 1 DRAWING IS TO SCALE
1" = FULL SCALE
IF BAR MEASURES:
1/2" = HALF SCALE

ORIGINAL
CHECKED DRAWN DESIGN DATE NO.

REVISIONS
SKM ENGINEERING INC, © COPYRIGHT 2020 BOUNTIFUL, UTAH
DRAWING NO.

SHEET CITY OF BANNING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUALIZATION BASIN 533 W 2600 S, Suite 25
Bountiful, Utah 84010
Phone: (801) 677-0011
www.skmeng.com
E903DETAILS 3 ELECTRICAL - DETAILS
C:\USERS\MICHAEL.JOHNSON\AQUA ENGINEERING\CITY OF BANNING - 001815.C EQUALIZATION BASIN\050 DRAFTING\999 ELECTRICAL\999-E903.DWG 4/25/2021 MPJ DCL MPJ 00/00/0000 0

STRUCTURE (TYP)

ANCHOR TO ROOF
REC. NEMA L5-20R OR EQUAL

END VIEW SIDE VIEW
SCALE: NONE

TO SUIT

CHAIN LENGTH

CONDUIT SO CORD

EXPOSED RAISED COVER
AND "LEVITON" #70520-FR
4" SQUARE BOX WITH

MOUNTING HEIGHT EVEN WITH

BOTTOM OF TRUSS UNLESS

OTHERWISE NOTED
802
TYP
CGB

FINISHED

CEILING
800
TYP

PRE-CAST J-BOX

FASTENED TO STRUCTURE
SCALE: NONE

FIXTURE MOUNTED

TIGHT TO CEILING
PRE-CAST J-BOX.

PROVIDE GASKET

BETWEEN BOX AND
FIXTURE. INSTALLATION
TO BE WATER TIGHT.

BUILDING
WALL

WALL PACK
SCALE: NONE
810
TYP
1-1/4"
SCALE: NONE
STEEL SCREWS.

OTHERWISE.

4. PROVIDE BLANK NAMEPLATES FOR ALL SPARE

3. ATTACH ALL NAMEPLATES WITH STAINLESS
VERTICAL CENTERLINE OF THE CUBICAL OR DEVICE.

2. ALL NAMEPLATES TO BE MOUNTED ON THE

1. ALL LETTERS TO BE 1/4" UNLESS NOTED
AND FUTURE DEVICES.

NOTES:
"EQUIPMENT NUMBER"
"EQUIPMENT NAME"
3" OR 4"
900
TYP
DOOR
SWITCH
2 #20
914

TYP SINGLE DOOR WITH LOCKSET HARDWARE
TO PLC
SCALE: NONE

PVC COATED GRS

TO JUNCTION BOX

STAINLESS STEEL ANCHOR WITH HOOK

LOCATED ACCESSIBLE FROM ACCESS HATCH
503
TYP
501
TYP
300
TYP
SCALE: NONE
504
TYP

STAINLESS STEEL

STRAIN RELIEF
WEIGHT
FLOAT

PVC COATED GRS

CAST IN CONCRETE

TO JUNCTION

BOX OR PANEL

PVC COATED

LIQUID TIGHT

STRAIN RELIEF

EXTEND CONDUIT SO STRAIN

RELIEF IS ACCESSIBLE FROM

ACCESS HATCH OR REMOVABLE

PLANKING

EYEBOLT

TO JUNCTION

BOX OR PANEL

CAULK ENDS ALL

AROUND (TYPICAL)
4-20mA

FLOW SIGNAL

POWER SUPPLY

BRANCH CIRCUIT

CONDUIT WITH

VENDOR FURNISHED
CABLES
4-20mA

FLOW SIGNAL

POWER SUPPLY

BRANCH CIRCUIT

TRANSMITTER

TRANSMITTER
SCALE: NONE
NOTES:

ALL VENDOR FURNISHED CABLES SHALL BE CUT TO LENGTH
AND TERMINATED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.

GROUND PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.

1. 2.

FLOWMETER WITH TRANSMITTER

MOUNTED SEPARATELY

FLOWMETER WITH TRANSMITTER
551
TYP
1642

APPENDIX B
Sample Flow Charts
1643
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
1653
1654
1655
1656
1657
1658
1659
1660
1661
1662
1663
1664
1665
1666
1667
1668
1669
1670
1671
1672
1673
1674
1675
1676
1677
1678
1679
1680
1681
1682
1683
1684
1685
1686
1687
1688
1689
1690
1691
1692
1693
1694
Exhibit E
Design-Builder’s Proposal

1695
Prepared by:

AECOM/W. M. LYLES CO.,
A Joint Venture
Submitted:

October 11, 2024
Attention: Barbara Mason

PROPOSAL
Design and Construction of the
City of Banning Wastewater
Treatment Plant and Recycled
Water Project
1696
AECOM/WM Lyles Design and Construction of the City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades Project | TOC Part I: Transmittal Letter, Team Administrative, and Financial Capacity (also uploaded separately in OpenGov)....i Part II: Project Team, Experience, and Approach .................................................................................................. 1 Part III: Technical Approach........................................................................................................................................14 Part IV: Construction & Start-Up Process................................................................................................................29 Part V: Phase 1 Cost Proposal (under separate submittal) Part VI: Required Forms (uploaded into OpenGov)
Appendix A: Preliminary Drawings and Schedule
Appendix B: Resumes
Please note that forms, insurance letters, surety letters and any other required documents have been uploaded separately to your OpenGov procurement site per the RFP instructions.

Table of Contents
1697
AECOM/Lyles i
October 11, 2024
Barbara Mason, Purchasing Manager
City of Banning - Purchasing Division
99 E. Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220
Proposal for Progressive Design-Build Services for the City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades Project - RFP-24-074
We are excited by the opportunity to become a trusted partner of the City in developing the most cost-effective solution for your wastewater treatment plant upgrades that will minimize impacts to your rate payers while at the same time, provide a long-term solution to support community growth. Our team has worked hard to find design-to-budget ideas for your project and we are confident that the solutions we present in our proposal can save the City$10M+ compared to the original concept. Highlights of our proposal include:
• Experts skilled in progressive design-build and MBR systems. AECOM/Lyles have worked together on numerous progressive design-build treatment plant upgrade projects totaling over $1B, as well as many MBR systems.

These past experiences allow us to work together seamlessly to deliver your project and hone in on the biggest cost items, optimizing the budget for the City.
• Experience with San Gorgonio Pass and desert communities. From our wealth of experience delivering similar projects in surrounding communities (including Beaumont), we have a strong appreciation for pragmatic solutions that work for you.
• A proven progressive design-build management approach. We know how to streamline the crucial Phase 1 activities so that collaboration is fostered while still making timely decisions to maintain the overall project schedule.

We are committed to a transparent Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) presentation and converting this project from Phase 1 to Phase 2.
• Design to Budget Ideas that offer real savings. We have left no stone unturned in looking at ways to save the City money while still achieving your project goals. From optimizing basin sizing, to finding a creative way to forego the reverse osmosis (RO) system, we offer the City ways to lessen the impact to your rate payers, while maintaining the resiliency to accommodate local population growth and future permit expectations. • A dedication to a quality project. Our design to budget ideas do not come at a cost of quality or impacting the City’s options in the future. We are committed to using proven vendors and quality suppliers and our design provides for easy future expansion with low capital expenditure. • Our corporate commitment to make this a success for the City. We are committing the team provided herein for the duration of the project. We have learned that team continuity throughout the duration is critical to the overall project success and delivering the lowest total project cost.

Transmittal Letter, Team Administrative, I and Financial Capability PART
1698
AECOM/Lyles ii
Single Point of Contact for AECOM/Lyles – Project Manager Joe Lawrence is the single point of contact for the team, ensuring clear communication and streamlined project management.

Joe Lawrence
Design-Build Project Manager
26501 Madison Avenue
Murrieta, CA 92562
T: 916.644.9487 | E: [email protected]
We appreciate the City using an industry standard template as the basis for the sample agreement, and we are confident that we can negotiate a contract with the City for this project. We also confirm that we have read and understood all elements of the RFP. Furthermore, in our cost proposal, we have provided a detailed scope of work of our services.

Bonding and Sureties – The AECOM/Lyles team confirms we will meet the bonding requirements outlined in the Request for Proposal (RFP). We have included in our proposal a Surety Letter of Intent and the Proposal Bid Bond as required in RFP section IV.E.

Financial Capacity – Both AECOM and Lyles confirm there are no changes in our firms’ financial capacities and bonding capabilities. The financial statements included in our SOQ are the most current and there are no changes in our standings.

CEQA, Funding, and PLA Compliance – The AECOM/Lyles JV confirms we have reviewed the CEQA, Funding, and PLA Compliance requirements, signed and included the form in our proposal uploads in your procurement system, and agree to comply with the terms and conditions.

Per the instructions in the Request for Proposal, our Part V Phase 1 Cost Proposal has been submitted as a separate file.

Part VI Required Forms have been completed and uploaded into the OpenGov procurement system.

We have assembled a truly collaborative and integrated team. We look forward to sharing more details on our proposal during the interview. AECOM/Lyles appreciates the time and commitment the City has invested in this procurement process and appreciate you meeting with our team during our proposal development. Our goal as the City’s of Banning’s trusted partner is to implement a “no surprises” and “design to budget” commitment throughout the project. This can only happen through effective, open and transparent communication and we look forward to working side-by side with the City in delivering this project. Thank you for your consideration.

Respectfully submitted,
AECOM/Lyles Joint Venture
Joseph B. Lawrence - Project Manager Brian Daly, PE
SVP, Alternative Delivery Manager SVP, Director North America Water Design-Build Authorized Signatory Authorized Signatory
W. M. Lyles Co. AECOM Technical Services, Inc.

O: 916.375.1833 | M: 559.647.6650 O: 978.905.2527 | M: 781.799.1791 [email protected] [email protected]
City of Banning October 11, 2024
Proposal for Wastewater Treatment Plant Recycled Water Upgrades - RFP-24-074 Page 2 1699
AECOM/WM Lyles Design and Construction of the City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades Project | 1 City of Banning PART II | Project Team, Experience & Approach Key Project Personnel
As presented in our SOQ, the AECOM/Lyles key personnel
have delivered together on design-build treatment
projects in California with significant upgrade and
maintenance of plant operations considerations,
bringing demonstrated efficiency and collaboration to
the City. Our management team—along with Treatment
Process Design Lead Alex Franchi, Preconstruction
Manager Vince Guillama, Construction Superintendent
Anthony Pilato, Commissioning Lead Vijay Kumar, and
other team members—remain fully committed to meeting
all of the project objectives detailed in the City’s RFP.

Team Enhancement
We are presenting one key team member enhancement
in Joe Lawrence as our Design-Build Project Manager.

Joe has a distinguished career in the water/wastewater
industry, with 22 years of experience managing designbuild projects for public and private water and wastewater treatment facilities. Throughout his career, Joe has been involved in all aspects of project delivery including project management, preconstruction services, cost control and budgeting, construction
implementation, and start-up and commissioning on
numerous alternative delivery projects, including designbuild and progressive design-build projects. Many of these projects involved collaboration with the same
AECOM/Lyles JV team we are proposing for this project.

While we have NO CHANGE to the rest of our team or
any of the key staff presented in our SOQ, our team
will be further enhanced during contracting efforts with disadvantaged subconsultants from our Good Faith
Outreach efforts. We pledge to meet any goals required
by the City and/or different funding sources and grants.

On the next page is an update to our organizational
chart (Figure II-1) highlighting the enhancements to our team. We have also included a brief biography for our
project manager Joe Lawrence that summarizes his
qualifications. We would be happy to provide resumes for all of our team members at the City’s request. All other components of our team and SOQ remain unchanged.

Project Team, Experience, and Approach
The AECOM/Lyles Team presented in our SOQ is 100% committed to the success of the City’s WWTP and Recycled Water Upgrade project—from day one to day done.

II
PART
I am fully committed to
collaborating with the City for
the next several years to continue
the implementation and construction
of Banning’s WWTP project, ensuring a safe
and sustainable wastewater and recycled
water system for decades to come.
– Joe Lawrence
Design-Build Project Manager
I pledge to open lines of
communication with all
stakeholders, including
operations staff, to keep construction
moving on the project and deliver
first-class facilities of the highest quality, on
budget and schedule – with no surprises. – Marcos Reyes Construction Manager
I'm looking forward to this
exciting partnership with the
City of Banning where we
explore cost-effective solutions,
keeping the rate payers in mind at every
step as we design to budget for this
important project.
– Gabriel Perigault
Design Manager
9 Extensive resources that are fully committed to this
project
9 Simultaneous and direct access to design and
construction resources at all times through our
integrated joint venture
9 A team that has successfully worked together to
deliver other projects in the region
9 Proven ability to partner with owners through their
first progressive design-build and get to Phase 2
without exercising the “off-ramp”
9 Collaborative design process: price, constructability, operability are considered holistically
9 Innovative concepts to minimize total project cost
such as right-sizing tankage
9 Staff continuity through all project phases
9 Maintain ongoing plant operations with detailed
construction sequencing
9 Comprehensive start-up and commissioning plan
to ensure operations staff is trained to operated the
new facility
Benefits of the AECOM/Lyles Team
1700
City of Banning PART II | Project Team, Experience & Approach AECOM/WM Lyles Design and Construction of the City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades Project | 2 Figure 2-1: Organization Chart
Our combined organization promotes the
continuity of staff throughout all project
phases. Please note staff will be made
available to fulfill their responsibilities on the
project. We presented in our SOQ the AECOM/
Lyles team members’ availability for your
project—our team is committed to the City
and their availability is shown again in
Appendix B along with our key team
member resumes.

Philip Portillo, SMS 2
Safety Director
Brian Daly, PE 1
Grant Gourley 2
Executive
Management Board
Joe Lawrence 2
Design-Build Project Manager

CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
Marcos Reyes 2
Construction
Preconstruction
Manager
Vince Guillama 2
Construction
Superintendent
Anthony Pilato 2
Estimator/Cost Controls
Matt Cain 2
Scheduling Lead
Ryan Priestman 2
Commissioning Lead
Vijay Kumar 2
Treatment Process Lead
Alex Franchi, PhD, PE 1
Geotechnical/Civil
Steven Fitzwilliam, PE 1
Permitting Lead
Barbara Bartholomae 1
Structural
T.J. Catalano, PE 1
Architectural
William Goryl, RA 1
Electrical/I&C
Yasser Rizk, PE 1
Mechanical
Karen Bettencourt, PE
Design

INTEGRATED DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION TEAM

DESIGN MANAGER
Gabriel Perigault, PhD, PE 1
Legend/Firm Affiliation: 1 AECOM 2 W. M. Lyles Co.

Key Personnel, Resume Provided in Appendix B
Rosaida Harris 1
QA/QC Lead
Joe Lawrence
Design-Build Project Manager
Joe is a Senior Vice President at W. M. Lyles and Collaborative Delivery Manager with over 22 years of experience in managing and delivering largescale water and wastewater treatment projects. He has a proven track record in pre-construction planning, project management, pre-construction services, cost control and budgeting, construction implementation, and start-up and commissioning on numerous design-build and progressive design-build projects.

Joe is committed to delivering high-quality infrastructure while leading teams and managing complex project requirements.
9 Involved in every design-build
project completed by AECOM WML
in the last 15 years
9 Brings expertise in collaboration and
working with the team to design to
budget for project success
9 Met multiple times with the City of
Banning and understands the
solutions to upgrading the existing
wastewater treatment plant
9 Advanced understanding of various
delivery methods, including designbuild and progressive design-build 9 Deep technical expertise, particularly
in SCADA upgrades, biological
treatment, tertiary filtration, and
disinfection processes
Highly experienced progressive design-build project manager working on WWTP upgrades similar to the City of Banning Joe brings 20+ years of experience in managing wastewater treatment plant upgrades with a primary focus on collaborative delivery. He brings detailed preconstruction phase and estimating experience combined with years of heavy civil construction and start-up and commissioning for water/ wastewater infrastructure. He understands each step of the project lifecycle and how to lead a high-functioning team. Joe has been working closely with AECOM for the past 15 years on design-build projects such as:
• East County Advanced Water Purification (ECAWP) Packages 1 and 3 Progressive Design-Build
• City of Stockton Regional Wastewater Control Facility Progressive DesignBuild Upgrades • City of Davis Wastewater Treatment Plant Secondary and Tertiary Improvements, Design-Build
• City of Santa Cruz Graham Hill Water Treatment Plant Upgrades Progressive Design-Build
Why Joe?
At AECOM/Lyles, we are dedicated to fostering diversity and inclusion through active engagement with Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs). Our comprehensive outreach strategy, including advertised public events, ensures economic growth and equal opportunity. We host public outreach events to share information on collaborative projects, maximizing participation from both local and competitive environments. For example, at Hi-Desert Water District, our open house with local unions, businesses, subcontractors, and the public resulted in multiple bids and met all SRF grant requirements. For this project, we placed legal notice ads announcing the DBE opportunity in the Banning Record Gazette and performed searches on four websites (CA.GOV, DOT.CA, SBA, and CalTrans), resulting in solicitation of 1,223 DBEs. From that outreach effort, 21 DBEs have expressed interest in bidding.

Updates to SOQ
AECOM/Lyles project personnel are available to start work immediately and are committed to the City of Banning for the duration of your project Enhancing our Team... “W.M. Lyles Co., led by the exceptional project management of Mr. Joe Lawrence, delivered outstanding quality and expertise on the Galt WWTP Tertiary Filtration, UV Disinfection and Biosolids Improvements Project. Joe’s leadership ensured timely completion within the 206-day timeline and minimal change orders. We’re eager to collaborate with Joe and the W. M. Lyles Co. team again on future projects.” - James Boarer, P.E., Construction Manager, PSOMAS Good Faith
Efforts
1701
AECOM/WM Lyles Design and Construction of the City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades Project | 3 City of Banning PART II | Project Team, Experience & Approach Team Experience
The AECOM/Lyles team has NO CHANGE to our project
experience. The information presented in our Statement
of Qualifications (SOQ) demonstrates a long history of
working on design-build projects together as well as
unmatched local experience working on similar projects
for similar clients in Southern California. Table II-1 below summarizes the client reference projects previously
presented. Additional recent successful projects
include the CR&R Riverside County Environmental
Center in Perris, the Victor Valley Waste to Energy
project in Victorville, Morongo WWTP in Cabazon,
Beaumont, Hi-Desert, Yucaipa, Palm Springs and Lytle Creek WWTPs, all of which showcase our team’s deep-rooted understanding of the local area.

Table 2-1. Summary of Project Experience presented in our Statement of Qualifications Project Name/Location Scope of Services Relevance
Self
Performance
Level
Similar
Performance
Criteria
East County Advanced Water
Purification Progressive DesignBuild, Santee, CA AECOM/Lyles JV Progressive Design-Build
for WWTP and AWT
Reuse, RO, New Plant,
PDB, T22 compliance 78% 
S1 WWTP Improvements
Progressive Design-Build
Rialto, CA AECOM/Lyles JV
Progressive Design-Build
of WWTP improvements
Design to Budget,
significant cost
savings realized
75% 
Regional WPCF Upgrades
Progressive Design-Build
Stockton, CA AECOM/Lyles JV
Progressive Design-Build
of WWTP improvements
Design to Budget,
adjusted GMP to meet
Client’s goals
78% 
WWTP Salt Mitigation Upgrade
Project
Beaumont, CA W. M. Lyles
Construction of
treatment plant
upgrades including MBR
Neighboring
community facing
similar challenges
78% 
HDWD Wastewater Reclamation
Facility Progressive Design-Build
Yucca Valley, CA W. M. Lyles
Progressive Design-Build
of treatment plant
including MBR and UV
Design to Budget, $2M
in cost VE cost savings 75% 
This comprehensive project for the City of Imperial, completed in 2021 by Lyles, involved significant upgrades to the existing WWTP:
• Upgrades to the existing influent pump station and the construction of several new facilities
• New facilities included a grit structure, aeration basins, MBR facility, and dewatering facility
• Designed to efficiently process an average daily flow of 2.4 million gallons of wastewater
• Initial stages involved demolition of an existing aeration basin, setting up a shoring and dewatering system, and excavating 15,000 cubic yards of earthwork
• The team then installed approximately 5,500 lineal feet of below-grade piping and constructed the aeration basins, membrane bioreactor basins, and the slab for the dewatering facility building • The final stages involved the completion of the membrane bioreactor facility and installation of the abovegrade process mechanical piping and equipment Imperial Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade
BEST for

BANNING
Our team has prioritized this project over
other opportunities in the marketplace. We
have been tracking this project for 3+ years
because the City is the type of client we want
to work for—a pragmatic desert community
looking to make every dollar count.

Additional Project Experience
1702
AECOM/WM Lyles Design and Construction of the City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades Project | 4 City of Banning PART II | Project Team, Experience & Approach Management of the Project Team
The AECOM/Lyles team has no other companies as part
of our core team at this time. We have advertised this
project for 30 days in the Press Empire and, if selected, we intend to add small business firms, such as surveyors,
drillers and geotechnical firms, during Phase One to meet City goals and grant/funding source requirements.

As presented in our SOQ and reaffirmed in the previous
subsection, the AECOM/Lyles key personnel have
delivered together on design-build treatment projects in California. The team has successfully employed
designing-to-budget on other projects and will work in
close collaboration with City staff and its advisory team to implement this proven approach.

How Key Staff will Interact in a
Collaborative Manner
The AECOM/Lyles team will be led by Design-Build
Project Manager Joe Lawrence. Joe will bring his 22+
years of experience with water/wastewater treatment
plant construction in California. Joe will have overall accountability and day to day contact with the City and your advisors through the entire project.

Design Manager Gabriel Perigault will lead the overall
design of the project. He will work closely with the
preconstruction and construction teams and your staff to deliver a design that meets your budget. He will lead the technical workshops that are associate with our
collaborative approach. Gabriel has managed the
design for numerous water and wastewater facilities,
including the recent Davis, Rialto and Stockton WWTP
design-build projects delivered with Lyles. With 30+ years of experience and a leader in innovative treatment
technologies including MBR systems, he will guide the
team and provide the City with a project that provides
reliable performance while optimizing capital and
operational expenses.

Approach
Key staff have delivered together on progressive design-build wastewater projects and projects in the San Gorgonio Pass and desert areas, bringing lessons learned and collaboration to the City Treatment Process Lead Alex Franchi will lead the
treatment process train scheme and the technical details related to the MBR and disinfection systems. He will
coordinate with Gabriel, Vince and the rest of the team to make sure the most cost-effective technical solutions are brought forward and he will be on point for discussions with critical technology vendors to ensure our design and the scope of supply align.

Preconstruction Manager Vince Guillama will work
closely with Mike, Gabriel and the City’s team to establish the initial project estimate and update it regularly as design decisions are made and the scope is finalized. He will also work closely with Construction Manager Marcos Reyes in developing and maintaining the project
schedule. Vince is a proven collaborator in this role,
having provided preconstruction services for a multitude of DB projects, notably the City of Davis, City of Santa Cruz, East County AWP (1&3), and City of Stockton
Projects, all undertaken as part of the AECOM/Lyles JV.

Construction Manager Marcos Reyes will participate in
constructability and VE reviews during Phase One. He will work with Vince in maintaining the project schedule.

During Phase Two, he will oversee the construction of the upgrades. Marcos has over 15 years of experience
managing construction of wastewater facilities. He is
currently serving as WRF Construction Manager for the
ECAWP Project, following his successful role as
Construction Manager on the $25M Rialto WWTP Project
(also operated by Veolia), both in collaboration with
AECOM.

BEST for

BANNING
Being a highly experienced, integrated 50/50
JV team functioning as one entity, our business
operating culture is truly collaborative with
all parties dedicated to the same goal of
designing to a budget. This is in stark contrast
to other DB entities who will have designers
subcontracted to a general contractor.
1703
AECOM/WM Lyles Design and Construction of the City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades Project | 5 City of Banning PART II | Project Team, Experience & Approach Constructability, Operability,
Maintainability, Durability, Sustainability,
VE, and Efficiency of Design and
Construction
Applying the best aspects of progressive designbuild. Our approach builds upon the work completed by the City and our concept is a starting point for discussions with the City’s team (see Part 3). We applaud the City’s approach to use the progressive design-build (PDB)
model and we know that collaborative, cost-centric
discussions will drive best solutions. We are no strangers to this process with PDB projects completed and
underway in Rialto, Stockton, and the ECAWP program in
Santee. Phase One management elements will be
focused on workshops, design development, price
certainty and construction sequencing. Preconstruction
Manager Vince Guillama and Construction Manager
Marcos Reyes will participate in the VE sessions and
constructability reviews to provide their input.

Our JV will use Primavera P6 to track the schedule and
adjust as needed. The meetings and workshops schedule
will be critical in driving technical decisions to maintain overall project schedule and designing to budget as the primary goal through direct presentation of cost impacts as they relate to specific options. Details on our approach to both Phase One and Two are presented in the
following subsections.

Phase One Approach
Our design to budget approach starts with a detailed
agreement of the process train and we will leverage
vendor provided designs when they provide capital
and operational benefits.

Our scope and initial estimate will establish the City’s the must have scope items. We will also make separate list of wish list items that can be added into the project during Phase One, as the budget allows.

Building on the baseline cost and critical guardrails
established from the programming workshop, we will
step through the workshop process. The baseline cost
model will be used to measure alternatives or
modifications against the initial layout to compare costs associated with alternative concepts, equipment or
approaches that may be contemplated during the
workshop process. Decision Log maintains positive
momentum and serves as a go-to reference point so that
decisions aren’t constantly revisited.

We will use a clear process that documents agreed
upon elements in the Decision Log to maintain
positive project momentum. Elements that need
adjustments or a different alternative will be vetted,
refined and brought back to the City at a future meeting.

We have learned that having a baseline upon which to
compare “real-time” options allows the entire team to
make educated, value-based decisions with the total
project cost in mind. A critical Lesson Learned by our
team is the importance of having sufficient engineering and planning budget. The additional effort placed on
Phase 1 will result in significantly lower total project costs through sound decision making and review of total
project lifecycle costs
Disciplined cost accounting controls are the essential
responsibility of the Project Manager in Phase One as
engineering progresses to 100%. Weekly Estimates to
Complete (ETC) are tracked by the Project Manager with
weekly design cost reporting prepared by the JV controls team. Design to budget efforts is continual with regular construction cost and schedule adjustments reflected in the outcomes of design workshops, equipment/materials
market interaction and early subcontractor inclusion.

As described later in this Section under the Collaboration heading, we envision a workshop process to involve
the City and its advisors to make the above
decisions. The workshops will also be a key way we
obtain operations team input and get feedback
when finalizing equipment selection.

BEST for

BANNING
Our proven approach for PDB projects starts
with an initial estimate that is based on real
numbers from similar projects plus market
outreach. The estimate is updated regularly,
allowing the City to make value based
decisions so there is no surprises at the GMP.

PROVEN INNOVATION TO DRIVE DOWN

PROJECT COSTS
Our VE and optioneering efforts on
other design-build projects has resulted
in an average savings to clients of 21%
when comparing our solution to the
owner’s original concept
1704
AECOM/WM Lyles Design and Construction of the City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades Project | 6 City of Banning PART II | Project Team, Experience & Approach Design
During Phase One, as part of the Progress Meetings, we
will conduct design reviews on selected topics with the purpose of disseminating information, promoting
discussion and obtaining feedback so that City staff
understands the design and has enough information to
approve the design. More resembling a workshop than a
meeting, this approach to review meetings has been
developed and honed on similar large and complex
projects. We will manage design review meetings using
the following best practices:
9 Dedicated leader to facilitate
9 Up-front technical discussion materials
9 Clear agendas that specify: (1) purpose and
decisions expected, (2) overview topics and issues, (3) discussion and review, (4) summary decisions made,
and (5) approvals
9 Clear, action-oriented minutes
9 Follow-up action items and distribution of issue
resolution
Schedule Management and City Reviews. We will use
Primavera P6 to track progress and adjust course, as
needed. The meetings, submittals, and review schedule
will be critical in driving decisions to maintain overall project schedule. As described more fully in Part IV, we will use a cost loaded schedule and provide 3 week look
aheads as appropriate.

Our Integrated JV Addresses City Concerns
Providing continuity in leadership between Project
phases. A hallmark of how the AECOM/Lyles JV does
design-build work is that we promote staff continuity
throughout all project phases. This virtually eliminates any risk of discontinuity in leadership and any issues with information transfer. For instance, the project manager will stay engaged for all phases of the project. The design manager and all discipline leads will continue to be
involved in the project after the design is complete,
providing interpretation and responding to any questions in the field to make sure the design intent is carried out in We will use 3D models during detailed design. We have experienced the benefits of using this tool in other projects as it provides a better perspective facilitating the understating among the design-build team, City staff, and other stakeholders, and, in the end, the decision-making process. It also helps break down the
compartmentalization between design and construction, and avoid clashes between disciplines during construction, to see the project visualized early on.

BEST for

BANNING
We recognize that all projects face some level of
financial pressure. To this end we have already begun
looking at potential alternatives to to meet the City’s desired project budget. While these alternative will be developed more comprehensively during the phase 1
activities, we present a number of these in detail in Part III as a sign of commitment to the City that we take this responsibility seriously:
9 Right-sizing tankage and basins to save cost.

Our modeling and analysis shows that the sizing
the aeration and mbr basins can be reduced,
saving construction costs, while still providing the
appropriate redundancy.
9 Three tank configuration of bioreactors. Will
provide required redundancy while providing cost
savings.
9 Eliminate the initial need for the RO system and
evaporation ponds. We believe that blending MBR
effluent and potable water can meet the nitrogen
and TDS limits at a lower cost.
9 Hydraulics. Maximize the use of gravity flow
through the plant to lower pumping costs
9 Eliminate the third primary clarifier. Savings
can provided by not constructing the third primary
clarifier without impacting the performance of the
MBR system
9 Site layout. The site’s large area with limited
interface points allows for spacious logistics,
staging, and stormwater management. Early
procurement and just-in-time delivery will
streamline the project timeline and prevent delays.
9 Chlorination basin vs. UV disinfection. Eliminate
the construction of a large chlorination basin with a
more cost-efficient and environmentally friendly UV
disinfection.

OPTIMIZING DESIGN-TO-BUDGET

THROUGH CREATIVE CONCEPTS
1705
AECOM/WM Lyles Design and Construction of the City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades Project | 7 City of Banning PART II | Project Team, Experience & Approach what is being built. Similarly, the construction manager will engage in the project during phase 1 to understand the design, and provide constructability and VE input.

Compartmentalization between design and
construction. As an integrated JV our delivery model
breaks down the barriers that could compartmentalize
design and construction activities. Our key staff have
worked together before on progressive design-build
treatment plant projects have a rapport and an efficient communication style that promotes collaboration. For
example, our team does page flip reviews at critical
milestones to make sure that the design and construction implementation members are all aligned in what is being presented and priced.

Contractor or equipment supplier interests overriding
engineering-based decisions. All equipment and
materials for the project will be reviewed and approved by the Engineer of Record that designed and specified
these items, including any vendor provided designs. For critical equipment, including all mechanical equipment, AECOM/Lyles, in close coordination with the City, will also be in charge of recommending to the City suppliers,
selecting the equipment and approving all shop
submittals prior to release for fabrication. Alex Franchi will be involved with critical process equipment to make sure vendor supplied equipment align with overall design
decisions and anticipated performance requirements.

This approach provides an unbiased process that
ensures that the City’s preferences are considered and
the best value with respect to cost, functionality, and durability are part of the selection process.

Phase Two Approach
Experience Developing/Managing the GMP
As an experienced design-builder, AECOM/Lyles has a
unique advantage of developing realistic costs during the GMP development phase of the project. Our DB project
manager, design and procurement team and
subcontractor partners understand technical and quality requirements and are skilled at developing detailed,
bottoms up cost estimates. They have long-lasting
relationships with reputable equipment suppliers which
reduces the risk of scope creep during the design and,
ultimately, construction.

Additionally, our team will work closely with the City to implement decisions on equipment, materials of
construction, and overall site considerations that will positively impact the GMP. Techniques will include using a decision log to document each decision made along with
any associated cost impacts, so that a running tally of the current project cost is maintained and can be easily measured against a baseline. Our team will also make
sure that multiple bids are received for not only the
equipment but also subcontractors to achieve the lowest project cost possible. Internal contractor prequalification procedures will also verify that vendors and
subcontractors selected for the project are financially stable and will provide the workmanship and ethics
commensurate with the AECOM/Lyles JV philosophy.

Beginning with our rigorous prequalification process, we will communicate with subcontractors the importance of
quality, safety and performance, in addition to best value provided.

Our team recommends the GMP process occurs after the
60% design milestone in order to maintain the project
schedule.

Estimating and Cost Monitoring
AECOM and Lyles have very successful histories
managing costs on both lump sum and progressive
design-build projects. Vince and Marcos will provide the City and its advisory team frequent cost estimate
updates during design leading not surprise at the GMP.

Our partnership with key subconsultants during the
design phase will allow our team to further develop a
reliable cost estimate for the GMP, that accurately
captures the electrical components of this project.

Highlights of AECOM/Lyles team estimating, and cost
monitoring procedures include:
9 An initial cost estimate will be performed before the kickoff workshop and updated on an ongoing basis.
9 One difference maker for AECOM/Lyles is that we
start with a detailed estimate from day one, drawing
upon a wealth of similar past construction projects
to establish a baseline estimate. We are much more
accurate and transparent than our competition.
9 VE and constructibility reviews are performed
throughout the design phase.
9 Another difference maker is the flexibility of
contractual approach from conversion to a lump
sum or cost plus with a GMP with a shared savings,
depending on the City’s preferences.

BEST for

BANNING
We design and build to budget on all our
design-build projects to ensure client
satisfaction: the proof – no client has ever
taken the off ramp at the GMP stage on any of
our projects.
1706
AECOM/WM Lyles Design and Construction of the City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades Project | 8 City of Banning PART II | Project Team, Experience & Approach Biggest Lessons Learned Developing GMPs
AECOM/Lyles will meet the challenges of establishing the GMP price for the City’s project, by staying flexible during the design process and keeping a strong focus on
designing to budget. The three key issues we have
encountered when designing to the GMP include:

1. Defining project “must haves” to establish early
cost certainty. AECOM and Lyles use an early
partnering approach through common sharing of
project budgets, which allows both the owner and
design-builder to establish “must-have” items as well
as “wish list” items and make value-based decisions
against a mutually agreeable baseline.

2. Clear scope expectations/scope-creep. Early
agreement between the owner and the design-builder
regarding the core project design criteria and scope is critical to cost, schedule, and project certainty.

3. Escalation of materials. Recent market volatility and global economics have affected material costs and
could have a significant impact on overall project
costs. Our constant bidding of wastewater projects in
California allows us to stay in touch with market
pricing and minimizes surprises at the GMP deliverable.

Other Mitigation Measures. AECOM/Lyles suggests
holding regular meetings to openly discuss and evaluate engineering options, while providing a continual accurate update of the agreed upon budget and schedule, and
jointly maintaining control of detailed scope. This
approach has worked well on other projects and will
serve as another way to facilitate design to budget.

Approach to Construction
AECOM/Lyles has a proven track record of successfully
delivering complex treatment plant projects, particularly with desert communities. We have developed a robust
approach to site layout, logistics, and construction
sequencing that prioritizes efficiency, safety, and
environmental stewardship. Details of construction
approach are presented in Part IV of this proposal.

Site Layout and Logistics
We approached the site layout and logistical plan with a focus on maximizing efficiency and minimizing
disruption. As part of this analysis we are also focused how decisions we make relative to the layout and logistics of build the new plant and how that could affect the
day-to-day operations of your existing plant. Our
approach has been developed to have minimal impact
to current vehicular and pedestrian access and
maintaining as little impact to your current facility.

The project site provides a large area with limited
interface and tie-in points for the main portion of the work with the existing facility, affording a spacious area for site logistics, staging, and stormwater management
both during and following construction. We understand
that this project demands meticulous planning and
execution to balance the need for efficient construction LEGEND
1: Construction Laydown
2: Staging Area
3: Access Roads/Traffic Management
4: Parking
5: Site Security Measures
6: Emergency Exit
7: Restricted Area
8: Soils Hauling Route
9: Waste Management Facilities
 Charles St.

TRAILERS & LOCKABLE

CONTAINER STORAGE

TRAILER & VISITOR

PARKING

EXISTING PLANT
ACCESS

ENTRANCE WITH

GUARD SHACK

CONSTRUCTION AREA

ACCESS RD
& CRANE/EQUIPMENT ROUTE

CRAFT PARKING

SITE ACCESS
ROAD

PERIMETER FENCE &

GREEN SCREEN
AROUND

CONSTURCTION
AREA

EMERGENCY
EXIT

UNDISTURBED
AREA

NEW FACILITY

LAYDOWN &

STAGING

SOILS HAULING
ROUTE
Figure 2-2. Site Plan Logistics
1707
AECOM/WM Lyles Design and Construction of the City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades Project | 9 City of Banning PART II | Project Team, Experience & Approach with the necessity of minimizing environmental impacts.

The uncomplicated nature of the site enables a
straightforward approach to layout, logistics, and
resource management, ensuring that all construction
activities are confined within the designated boundaries while adhering to strict regulatory requirements. We do not foresee any resource limitations that would affect
project progress. With the ability to self-perform 75% of the work, we can control costs, create efficiencies,
enhance coordination, mitigate risks, and improve safety while enabling resource flexibility and ensuring quality.

Our early procurement strategies and just-in-time delivery streamline project timelines by securing critical materials and equipment in advance, minimizing storage costs,
reducing the risk of damage, and preventing delays in
construction progress.

Location and Layout of Key Elements. Construction
Laydown Areas: Strategically positioned within the site to allow easy access to materials while minimizing the
footprint on undisturbed areas.

Laydown and Staging Areas. Located near the main
construction zones to facilitate the efficient movement of equipment and materials, reducing downtime and
delays. This will be constructed immediately adjacent to the work site to avoid double or triple handling of
materials.

Access Roads
and Traffic
Management will
be clear and
concise, carefully
planned to ensure
safe and efficient
movement of
vehicles and
machinery while
minimizing
impacts on
surrounding areas. This will also allow easy access to all the different key element areas and keep truck haul roads away from trailers and parking areas for a straight, easy in and out. Traffic flow will be managed to prevent
bottlenecks and maintain site safety. We expect a
primary access point off Charles street past the existing entrance of the existing facility.

Parking. Designated parking areas will be established
within the site boundaries to prevent off-site disruptions and ensure easy access for workers. Two designated
areas will be created: one for CM/Project personnel and another for craft labor and subs.

Site Security Measures. A comprehensive security plan
will be implemented, including fencing, surveillance, and controlled access points, to protect the site and ensure compliance with safety protocols. We will include a guard shack at the front gate and a separate entrance to avoid disturbing the existing plant entrance. Site fencing and security gates will be locked after hours. Web-based
security cameras will also be installed.

Utilities Placement. Utilities will be strategically placed to support construction activities while minimizing
interference with the natural environment and existing
infrastructure.

Waste Management Facilities. Designated areas will be
established for waste collection and sorting, ensuring
that all waste is handled in an environmentally
responsible manner. These areas will be strategically
positioned near the main construction/staging area, as
well as near the trailers and exit, for ease of access.

Containment within Boundaries. All elements,
including laydown areas, staging zones, and access
roads, will be fully contained within the specified site boundaries and established easements. This ensures that our activities do not encroach on protected areas or
disrupt neighboring properties.

Mitigation Measures to Minimize Environmental
Impacts. To further minimize environmental impacts, we
will implement a range of mitigation measures, including sediment control, dust suppression, and noise reduction strategies. These measures will be continuously
monitored and adjusted as needed to ensure compliance
with environmental regulations and best practices.

Startup and Commissioning
Our startup and commissioning approach is presented in
Part IV of this proposal. We acknowledge the
procurement requirements regarding startup and
commissioning, including the requirement for 30 days for startup and testing and pre-commissioning meeting to
discuss plan with the City 3 to 6 months before startup and testing is scheduled to begin.
1708
AECOM/WM Lyles Design and Construction of the City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades Project | 10 City of Banning PART II | Project Team, Experience & Approach Permitting
BEST for

BANNING
Our long-term relationships with California
permitting agencies and regulators will
provide the City with a streamlined process to
meet the project schedule.

Anticipated Permits and Schedule. Please see our full
project schedule included in Appendix A for a breakdown of the timeframe to apply for and obtain permits. Below is a list of anticipated permits:

City of Banning
• Community Development
• Building Permit
• Public Works Coordination
• Encroachment Permit Coordination
County of Riverside
• Dept. of Environmental Health
• Solid Waste Facility Requirements
• Fire Dept. - Hazardous Materials Div.
• Hazardous Materials Business Plan
• Transportation and Land Mgmt Agency and Planning
• Flood Control and WaterConservation District
CA State Waterboard R7: Colorado River
• Stormwater
• Industrial User Waste Discharge Reqmnts
• SWPPP Updates associated w/Industrial Activities
• Construction General Permit (w/SWPPP by contractor)
• Recycled Water
• Title 22 Eng. Report for Prod., Dist., & Use of Recycled Water
South Coast Air Quality Management District
• Authority to Construct Permit
• Permit to Operate (after Construction)
Understanding of Permit Process and Support for the
City. For permitting and governmental approvals we will create a Permit Work Plan that will identify each specific permit required, the permitting agency contacts,
submittal requirements, prerequisite conditions,
processing times, and schedule for submittals. Key
success factors for our plan include:
9 Implementing up-front coordination with the City and
permit agencies to facilitate the approval process.

This will help minimize the risk of delays.
9 Coordinating design activities with permit submittals 9 Preparing discrete permit submittal packages
9 Follow-up shortly after submittal to confirm
information compliance and/or additional
information required
Title 22 and RWQCB permits. The AECOM/Lyles Team
will provide the necessary technical information to
support development of the Title 22 Engineering Report
permit approval process. We will provide the elements
that are related to our scope of work, i.e., descriptions of the WWTP , pathogenic microorganism control, reliability of features for the new facilities, contingency plan,
monitoring system, recycled reverse osmosis
performance, advanced oxidation performance,
operational optimization plan, and an operations and
maintenance readiness plan.

CEQA Compliance. We will review the CEQA
documentation and the design team will incorporate the
specific requirements into the early design concepts.

Specific measures will be taken to ensure applicable
mitigation, monitoring and reporting measures will be
included on design plans to foster compliance. At the
onset of the project, a master list of Mitigation,
Monitoring, and Reporting Program (MMRP) requirements
that are applicable to each design element will be
created and distributed to the project team.

Grant/Loan Compliance. AECOM/Lyles is very
comfortable working on projects with SRF and WIFIA
requirements; both the ECAWP, Davis and Stockton
design-build projects received SRF funding. We will review existing grant and loan requirements, including
documentation and reporting requirements, with the City at the onset and incorporate those procedures into our
project management and execution plan to ensure
schedule and funding compliance. Task and schedule
reporting milestones will be added into our master
project schedule.

Design Build Quality Control Plan
One of the benefits of AECOM/Lyles’ extensive history
of working together previously on PDB projects is
that we have a well-established joined QA/QC
program that provides robust oversight at every
stage of the project. Building on the successful QA/QC
programs we have executed together on the Rialto
WWTP, Stockton WWTP, and Santa Cruz WTP PDB
projects, we will implement the following program.

Our Certified Quality Management System
AECOM/Lyles will provide the City with a Quality
Management Plan (QMP) that will define the procedures
and protocols that we will utilize to provide QA/QC
throughout the project, from design through
construction, start-up and commissioning. The policies
1709
AECOM/WM Lyles Design and Construction of the City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades Project | 11 City of Banning PART II | Project Team, Experience & Approach and procedures provided within AECOM’s Quality
Management System (QMS) will be utilized as AECOM/
Lyles’ procedures to execute the QMP. The AECOM Water
offices in the U.S. are an ISO 9001:2015 certified
organization. ISO 9000 standards are globally
recognized as the foundation of establishing quality
management systems. Our QMP will include established
procedures governing overall quality management and
specific procedures for each phase of this project. The QA/QC program is enhanced when the City and the
AECOM/Lyles Team works collaboratively on a daily basis to monitor progress. The AECOM/Lyles Team selfperforming civil, concrete and mechanical aspects of the work provides optimum control of quality workmanship.

Construction work progress will be monitored and
documented using the Site Field Resident’s (SFR’s) Daily Report which will document the progress of the work by
recording the time development of the work, weather
conditions, the crew sizes, equipment, etc. The SFR will review the reports to verify their accuracy. Work progress will also be documented in the CPM Schedule. This
documentation includes operating logs, source and field testing/sampling log, records of inspections and tests
with daily logs and site photographs, written reports and engineering data of material testing, audit reports (from third parties to the JV), certifications, proper equipment installation confirmed by manufacturer representatives, system test results, personnel qualifications and
certifications records, procedures and document review
records. QA/QC records will be uploaded to the agreed
upon project portal on a routine basis for review by the City.

Document Control and Records Management
We will launch and maintain an internet-based electronic Document Management System (DMS) to provide
efficient loading and retrieval of project-related
documents, provide links and search functions indicating where the documents are located within the DMS, and
provide training for key City personnel that will have
access to the DMS. All documents and records will be
uploaded to the City’s system on a routine basis to ensure your staff has access to current data at any given time.

The QA/QC staff is empowered to enforce all quality
objectives and will maintain all the necessary recorded documents to provide the City with proper
implementation of a QA/QC Program.

Key Personnel responsible for QA/QC
QA/QC Lead Rosaida Harris, will have overall
responsibility for the Quality Management Plan (QMP).

Rosaida is a QA/QC leader for AECOM Water projects. In
close coordination with design and construction team,
Table 2-2. Our quality control process provides oversight at every step from concept to completion Design-Build
Quality
Management
This plan will outline the quality assurance and quality control requirements for design, permitting, construction, commissioning, and testing phases of the project. The plan will detail procedures that we will apply to ensure that each element of the project is delivered with quality in accordance with the contract documents and industry standards. We will use standardized forms and checklists to document all procedures have been followed according to the plan.

Technical
Reviews
Our ISO 9001 standards require review and sign-off by a Technical Quality Advisor for all key disciplines.

This offers the project team timely reviews. Each submittal will be reviewed for engineering decisions and correctness of calculations, code compliance, as well as content, clarity and presentation, incorporation of standards, consistency with the City’s project budget and schedule. Quality control reviews will be documented through our project website and each corrective action noted in our QA/QC log.

Construction
Management
and Inspection
The AECOM/Lyles team will provide full-time construction management services reporting directly to City staff to oversee construction activities and coordinate materials testing to confirm compliance with the design and approved shop drawings.

Acceptance Test
Plan
This plan will outline the process and procedures for verifying all commissioning activities are coordinated, executed, and documented to demonstrate that the project performs satisfactorily in all manners, and meets all water quality objectives for final effluent reuse and disposal required by the Regional Board, including the Beaumont Basin Plan limits for TN and TDS.

Phase 2 - Revised QMP – Package 1 3 03/10/2023
Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 7

1.1Background ........................................................................................................................................... 7

1.2 References......................................................................................................................................... 7

1.3 Approach ............................................................................................................................................. 7

1.4 Quality Management Plan Purpose and Objective .................................................................. 7

1.5 QMP Amendments and Distribution ............................................................................................ 8

2.0 PHASE 2 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ...................................................... 9

2.1 Quality Management Responsibility ............................................................................................ 9

3.0 STAFFING AND ORGANIZATION ............................................................................................................ 10

3.1 Quality Management Organizational Structure .................................................................. 10

3.2 QA/QC Responsibilities and Authority Levels ............................................................................ 12

4.0 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY MEETINGS ................................................................................................. 16

4.1 Initial QA/QC Meeting ................................................................................................................... 17

4.2 Weekly Construction Meetings and QA/QC Updates ........................................................... 17

4.3 Specialty Trade/New Work QA/QC Meetings ......................................................................... 17

4.4 Special QA/QC Meetings ................................................................................................................ 17

4.5 Internal QA/QC Meetings and Continued Improvements ......................................................... 17

5.0 DEFINABLE FEATURES OF THE WORK ................................................................................................. 18

6.0 MATERIALS RECEIPT AND EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT ................................................................. 19

6.1 Manufacturing of Materials ........................................................................................................... 19

6.2 AIS Waiver Process ......................................................................................................................... 20

6.3 Delivery and Receipt of Materials ................................................................................................. 21

6.4 Material Receipt, Documentation and Location Reports: ......................................................... 21

6.5 Installation of Materials .................................................................................................................. 22

7.0 INSPECTION AND VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES ................................................................................... 22

7.1 Construction Quality Control and Field Inspection Approach............................................. 22

7.1.1 Initial Construction Site Inspections ................................................................................. 22

7.1.2 Progress Construction Site Inspections ........................................................................... 23

7.1.3 Inspection Verification Points ............................................................................................ 23

7.1.4 Special Inspection and Observation .................................................................................. 25

EAST COUNTY ADVANCED WATER PURIFICATION PROJECT
PHASE 2 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN

SANTEE, CALIFORNIA
Phase 2 - Revised QMP – Package 1 4 03/10/2023

7.1.5 Non-Conformance and Construction Deficiencies......................................................... 25

8.0 MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT TESTING ANDSAMPLING................................................................ 26

9.0 DOCUMENTATION MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................... 29

9.1Final Design Coordination and Independent Review .................................................................... 29

9.2Construction Documentation and Records Management............................................................ 29

10.0 TRANSITION FROM CONSTRUCTION TO START-UPSERVICES ..................................................... 32

10.1 Control of Operational Status - Startup and Commissioning.................................................. 32

10.2 Operations and Maintenance......................................................................................................... 34

11.0 ACCEPTANCE PLANS .............................................................................................................................. 34

12.0 QUALITY AUDITS...................................................................................................................................... 34 Appendix............................................................................................................................................................. 35 QualityDefinitions............................................................................................................................................. 35 Appendix - Link.............................................................................................................................................. 36 Project Structural Testing Requirements.................................................................................................... 36 Appendix - Link.............................................................................................................................................. 37 Forms and Logs - Inspection Checklists ..................................................................................................... 37 Appendix D - Link ........................................................................................................................................... 38 Inspection and Test Plans .............................................................................................................................. 38 Appendix E - Link .......................................................................................................................................... 39 Third Party Laboratory Qualification and Certifications................................................................................. 39 Appendix F - Link .......................................................................................................................................... 40 Resumes............................................................................................................................................................... 40 Through our numerous projects done together, we
have developed a strong QA/QC program that
blends design and construction activities.
1710
AECOM/WM Lyles Design and Construction of the City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades Project | 12 City of Banning PART II | Project Team, Experience & Approach she will be responsible for monitoring the QA/QC aspects of the project, coordinating with the appropriate lead
engineers, construction management and site
superintendents and technical discipline needs.

AECOM/Lyles Team has extensive QA/QC experience
routinely performing full oversight of essentially selfinspection on many public projects. This experience will provide the City with a high level of transparency.

Team Partnership Environment
The AECOM/Lyles JV promotes collaboration across
all elements of the project life-cycle and with all
stakeholders—it is more than a philosophy, it is a core value. It demands proactive involvement, respectful
dialogue, challenges to the status quo, and transparency by all parties. We have used our JV collaboration
approach successfully on several of California’s largest PDB projects. Internally, our design and construction
personnel are fully integrated. This means that our
designers are not designing in isolation; rather, they are in constant communication with construction personnel
and your team to validate that key design decisions such as the location of construction joints, or the type of pipe restraint is consistent with what has been priced. This focused dialogue allows us to stand behind our
commitment of “no surprises” at the GMP or at any
interim pricing update. We commit to optimizing the
City’s goals and vision, and to best assure a successful project journey. This is illustrated on the next page in Figure II-2, which provides a roadmap that shows how we will develop and finalize the design during phase 1,
maintaining the schedule while also incorporating crucial feedback from the City.

City Involvement and Communication
Key aspects of our collaborative approach that facilitate City involvement include:
9 Collaborative, detailed approach to ensure the
right data is carried forward as design criteria.

The goal is to get all preferences and constraints
on the table so the best options are advanced for
implementation in the design.
9 Engineering meetings that seamlessly coordinate
construction and operations elements. Our design
team holds internal weekly progress meetings. Every
few weeks, production drawings are uploaded to
MS Teams so that the estimating and construction
teams can review. Joe, Gabe and Vince will efficiently
manage constructability challenges to confirm
the design drawings reflect the most cost-efficient
approach to construct the project. As VE ideas arise
they will evaluate the cost and schedule impacts and
provide an overview to facilitate proactive dialogue
with the City’s project team. We will gain consensus
with your team through bi-weekly coordination
meetings that track overall status, and perform
continuous constructability review and reach
consensus on time sensitive issues.
9 Major milestone meetings to improve quality. Our
team meets ahead of major submittal milestones to
QC the design plans, reports and specifications that
accompany the submittal. This additional level of
scrutiny holds all parties accountable on our team
and further promotes our united, project-centric
approach.
9 Real time pricing updates improve decisionmaking. Starting with a solid initial estimate, we will isolate discrete alternatives with conceptual layouts;
then provide real-time updates to show where the
money is being allocated to facilitate value-based
decision-making by the City.
9 Leadership meetings will increase collaboration
and will occur throughout the project. The City’s
team (including operations staff), owner’s advisor
and other stakeholders participation will be key to
the project success. Meetings will be frequent early
in the process, as Phase One decisions have the
biggest impact on total project cost and operational
considerations.
9 Executive meetings demonstrate our corporate
commitment. Monthly meetings between the City
and our JV executive team (Grant Gourley and
Brian Daly) can bring early corrective action. They
also routinely reviews project status, adherence to
the City’s budget, staffing, and project challenges.

Brian and Grant are design-build practitioners on
numerous water/ wastewater design-build projects
and will be actively engaged in the details of this
project.

Project Manager Role
The project manager on this Project, Joe Lawrence, is
responsible for overseeing the entire project team,
including all firms and individuals involved in both preconstruction and construction phases. Joe has the authority to make critical decisions related to project management, resource allocation, and ensuring the
project meets its goals and objectives. He plays a key role in integrating design and construction organizations,
managing cost and schedule, and coordinating with key
personnel and entities involved in the Project.

I am fully committed to collaborating with the
City and providing leadership to find the most
cost-effective project that meets the City’s objectives and provides for future growth and expansion.
– Joe Lawrence
Design-Build Project Manager
1711
City of Banning PART II | Project Team, Experience & Approach AECOM/WM Lyles Design and Construction of the City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades Project | 13 Kick-off
Workshop
Site Layout
Collaboration
9 Site and roadway
optimization
9 Solar option
9 Space for future
expansion
9 Reuse of existing
infrastructure
9 Architectural
9 Hydraulic model
9 Process mechanical
9 Site plan/layout
9 General arrangements
9 Electrical/SCADA/I&C
9 Civil, Process,
Mechanical, P&IDs,,
HVAC and Plumbing
substantially complete.
9 All disciplines complete
pending final input
from City
9 Integrated strategy
to expedite
construction
while maintaining
existing operations
9 Risk mitigation
9 Need for Building vs.
canopies
9 Need to convert
secondary digester
9 Strategy
9 Sequence
9 Actions Baseline
cost
update
9 Need for Primaries
9 BioWin modeling
9 Disinfection strategy
9 Basin sizing
30% Design/
Final PDR
30%
Design
Workshop
60% Design
Workshop
GMP
Workshop
90% Design
Workshop Final Design
Workshop
Phase 2 NTP
Phase 2
MBR and Disinfection
Collaboration
SCADA
Workshop 1
SCADA
Workshop 2
SCADA
Workshop 3
SCADA
Workshop 4
10%
Design/
Draft PDR
Preferred
Vendors
Identified
Data Collection & Analysis
9 Geotechnical and survey
9 Potholing
9 Survey
9 Environmental support
$ 
$
LEGEND
Engineering Task
Collaborative Workshop
Engineering Deliverable
Construction Cost Check
Owner Review
$

Constructability/
Risk Mgmt
VE Workshop Workshop
Permitting
Collaboration
9 Initial
hydraulic
model
9 Title 22 Report
GMP + 2nd Constructability Workshop
In order to meet the overall schedule, we envision
GMP negotiations commencing after 60% design and
begin advancing long-lead equipment and early civil
works activities
NTP
Final
Design
BEST for

BANNING
Below we present representative details to show how robust the preparation and documentation for each key meeting will be with the City so you can be confident in each decision made:
9 Kickoff meeting. Discuss project expectations with the City including project execution, quality control, progress reporting, and deliverables. Review concept design and evaluate major unit process treatment that will meet the project performance goals.

Make a preliminary selection of preferred major unit process options and vendors. A Project Quality Plan and Project Execution Plan will be developed for discussion in the kick-off meeting. 9 Technical Progress meetings. The main purpose of the Technical Progress Meetings is to facilitate effective collaboration between the City and AECOM/Lyles to allow the selection of preferred unit process options that will be verified by subsequent design development. Evaluate and analyze the major unit process treatment alternatives that will meet the project performance goals and make a preliminary selection of preferred major unit process options. 9 Risk Management Workshop. AECOM/Lyles will develop and maintain a risk log. The risk log is the key document used in managing risk. The log records risks identified during proposal and work plan development; workshops, technical reviews, and monthly project meetings; and through other events that occur during the project. An initial risk workshop will be used to build consensus among stakeholders and as a means to bring the Project together to identify and evaluate potential risks Our team will be well-prepared for each meeting, bringing the required detailed information to allow the City to understand the options and make the best choices to meet your budget 9 Major equipment
9 PLCs
9 Instrumentation
9 Pumps
90%
Design
60%
Design
Early Work
&
Procurement
NTP
- A portion of the Project Progress Meetings will be allocated for Technical collaboration sessions. Only a few anticipated technical collaboration sessions are shown in this diagram.
- Value engineering will occur organically as part of our “Design-to-budget Approach”. Value engineering will be specifically covered during the design workshops for the different design milestones as well as the cost update workshops.
- Dates and duration of activities, including anticipated permit sequence are included in the schedule, included in Appendix A.

Figure 2-3. Roadmap to Achieve Lowest Total Project Cost in Phase 1 
 
Our comprehensive approach to planning, collaboration and design development will result in clear decisions, streamlined procurement and construction and the Lowest total project cost delivered for your project
1712
AECOM/WM Lyles Design and Construction of the City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades Project | 14 City of Banning PART III | Technical Approach
Introduction
We appreciate the challenges the City faces in balancing numerous items associated with the expansion of its
WWTP, including:
9 Minimizing the cost to your rate payers
9 Meeting future water quality requirements
9 Promoting the use of recycled water
9 Providing for long-term community growth
We will work closely with you to explore value based
solutions and will be constantly challenging ourselves to make sure a design to budget approach is employed.

AECOM/Lyles has taken a close look at the City’s initial concept and have noted several opportunities and
challenges with this concept on Figure 3-1 on the following page. Later in this section, we present our concept that builds on the one presented in the DCR to optimize the
project costs even further. We view this concept as the starting point on our collective journey to cost savings– throughout this section we present additional ideas, that if incorporated into the final scope, will provide the City additional cost savings while still meeting all of your core goals of this environmentally sensitive project.

Hydraulic Capacity
We understand the importance of efficient hydraulics
and accurate flow splitting between unit processes. Our team will optimize the head loss through the plant to
reduce the energy costs associated with increased
pumping, significantly reducing the initial capital
and lifelong operating costs of the facility.

We will confirm existing profiles (as related to our new work) to ensure compatibility with existing plant tie-ins and prepare a comprehensive hydraulic profiles that
considers minimum, average, and maximum flow rates
and considers anticipated critical units out of service.

Figure 3-2 on page 3-3 show our initial hydraulic profile and a drawing is included in Appendix A. Our proposed
scheme will minimize pumping as the wastewater
will only be pumped once from equalization through
the MBR process.

Technical Approach
Delivering a quality project while driving down cost
III
PART
BEST for

BANNING
Throughout this Section we highlight how
are team is committed to doing what is best
for Banning. We will bring forward the most
cost-effective solutions—but not at the cost
of quality. We will not cut corners or propose
items that are not in your best interest.

BEST for

BANNING
9 Redundant pumping (one redundant pump
in all trains that convey the rated hydraulic
capacity)
9 In normal operation, one duty fine screen and
one backup. Future third channel.
9 Three aeration basins, two duty and one
standby
9 Three Membrane Tanks, two duty and one
standby
9 UV disinfection channel duty (~.5 MGD) and
remaining flow directed to percolation ponds
or UV disinfection channel off-line and all flows
directed to percolation ponds
Hydraulic Highlights- Building in
Reliability & Flexibility for the future
Our cost saving ideas can
save the City more than
$10M
1713
City of Banning PART III | Technical Approach
AECOM/WM Lyles Design and Construction of the City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades Project | 15 Figure 3-1. Challenges and Opportunities with the City’s Base Design presented in the DCR 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1 Plant wide comprehensive hydraulic approach – Due to flat topography of the site careful consideration must be given to minimize long term operations costs associated with pumping flow multiple times vs use of gravity conditions where possible. 2 Water quality and flow data availability – use of historical data can be supplemented with text book evaluations for overall plant design considerations 3 Balancing the use of existing assets verses constructing new systems - utilization of existing plant primary clarifiers versus need for an additional primary as it relates to the overall ability of the plant to meet future effluent guidelines. 4 Identification of critical equipment and preselected vendors – this strategy will allow all parties to gain early certainty in performance, project schedule and total project cost early in the project .
5 Beaumont Basin water quality requirements (specifically for Total Nitrogen) present a unique challenge for reuse and overall design of the facility. Consideration and inclusion of a supplemental carbon source will be required to meet RWQB requirements.
6 Identifying design elements and construction approach to take advantage of adjacent structures will shrink the overall footprint on site, reduce subsurface utilities and lower the total project cost.
7 Getting the sizing correct- Right sizing building and units to accommodate immediate needs and potential future regulatory or facility expansion 8 Costly RO system adds significant complexity to the plant layout and more important operator interface, monitoring and maintenance . 9 Industry accepted CCT approach using Sodium Hypochlorite works against the Beaumont Basin TDS requirements and challenges long term treatment goals.

Using a technologically accepted alternative will lower overall operations cost, promote reuse, and align with long term TDS goals
When we looked at your DCR documents and drawings, we identified several key areas that were potentially adding cost, were technically complex or had implications for long-term operations or future expansion. These key items are summarized below and on page 18, we present our recommended solutions to improve the project budget and overall plant performance.

OUR INNOVATIVE CONCEPTS WILL SAVE THE CITY MONEY
9 Shrink the size of the basins while still
providing sufficient redundancy
9 Using existing assets instead of new
construction where practical
9 Strategy to eliminate the need for the costly
RO system will still meeting reuse goals
9 Placing MBR under canopy instead
Details of our cost
saving solutions are
presented on Figure
3-3 and throughout
this section
1714
City of Banning PART III | Technical Approach
AECOM/WM Lyles Design and Construction of the City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades Project | 16 Figure 3-2. Our Hydraulic Profile Minimizes Pumping Costs Our initial assessment is that the new primary effluent equalization basin pump station can convey the primary effluent from the equalization pump station to the proposed 2-mm mechanical screens. Effluent will be combined with return activated sludge (RAS) from the membrane tanks and then flow by gravity to a splitter box for even distribution through each aeration tanks and ultimately to the membrane tanks.

Treated effluent (permeate) will be pumped out of the membranes to fill permeate tanks that will feed the UV disinfection process and or discharge to the percolation ponds (via the existing chlorination tank).

Based on flow data presented in the Carollo study (2018) and the primary effluent equalization design documents, we believe the maximum day flow of 7.2 MGD shown in
the conceptual design documents correlates to a peak
hour wet weather flow. Based on the most current
equalization basin and pump station design provided we
believe the stated peak hourly flows can be managed by
the equalization basin volume and the maximum daily
flow rate should be in the range of 5 to 5.5 MGD which
could also be mostly absorbed by the EQ basin. We
recommend that early in the design setting a reasonable maximum day flow to secondary treatment that
balances design hydraulic throughput with the cost of
implementation.

We will confer with the City prior to finalizing design decisions cost and operational implications. This
collaborative effort will provide the City with all the technical and non-technical information necessary
to make value-based, design to budget decisions
that meet the City’s current needs while also creating
a plan for the future.
2105

HYDRAULIC PROFILE
MAX WSEL 2116.50

FROM EQ BASIN

PUMP STATION
2122.00

EQUALIZATION

BASIN PUMP STATION
2101.00 2100.00

TOP OF BERM VARIES
MIN 2115

RETURN FROM

WET WEATHER

FLOW STORAGE

OVERFLOW TO

WET WEATHER

FLOW STORAGE

MAX WSEL
2112.00

EQUALIZATION
BASIN

WET WEATHER

FLOW STORAGE

MIN WSEL
2098.00
TOW 2118.50
2114.00
2099.00

TO FINE SCREENS
2145
2150
2145
2150
2140 2140
2135 2135

BAR SCREEN GRIT CHAMBER METER VAULT

PRIMARY

CLARIFIERS
2118.25
TO EQ
BASIN
2119.00
2111.58
2126.39
INV
2124.36
TOW
2124.67
WEIR
2123.04
WEIR
2124.49
2123.22 2124.29
2124.91
2125.36
2125.01
2140 2140
2135 2135
2110
2115
2120
2125
2130
2125
2130
2110
2115
2120
2095 2095
2105
2110
2115
2120
2125
2130
2100 2100
2124.00
TOW
2130.00
2125
2130
2110
2115
2120
FINE

SCREENS

RAS/DEOX
TANK