Banning City Council
March 25, 2025

The City of Banning is required, through Best Management Practices (BMPs), to implement practices within our community which reduce pollutants entering into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The major components of the existing and 2025 NPDES Permit to implement the BMPs include: project management, attendance at Desert Task Force meetings, record keeping and Annual Report preparation; illegal dumping and illicit connection detection, inspection, spill prevention and cleanup activities; commercial and industrial facilities inspections (over 60 per year) and the review of all City issued business licenses for SB 205 compliance; implementing land development and plan review procedures including plan check, preparing Conditions of Approval, reviewing erosion control plans and WQMPs and ensuring post construction self-inspections are performed annually by required businesses; enforcing and implementing construction activities requirements of City and private development projects including construction site inspections, review of developer’s BMPs, erosion control plans and SWPPPs (Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans), and ensuring compliance with the Regional Board’s Construction General Permit requirements; maintaining City facilities, including the City 928
Corporate and Water Yards and Fire Station, and storm drains inspections and maintenance, removing trash and debris from the storm drain system, and from roads through street sweeping; and implementing public education and outreach programs by providing brochures to the public at City events and at the public counter, to businesses and contractors through inspections and storm water training of municipal staff.

The main new requirements of the 2025 NPDES Permit are:
• Asset Management
• Fiscal Cost Analysis/Cost Reporting
• Urban Pesticides
• Trash Amendment/Trash Capture Device Installation
• New Construction General Permit
• Continued SB 205 Compliance, business license verification of SIC Codes The NPDES program costs the City over $300,000 annually to manage the current NPDES Permit. The new 2025 NPDES Permit will cost more due to its new requirements. In order to generate revenue for the program, the City Council was requested on September 24, 2024 to consider reinstating a “grandfathered” assessment from 1994, called the CSA 152 NPDES assessment. This stormwater assessment is currently collected by the County on behalf of a number of participating cities via property tax bills. The County administers and manages the CSA 152 program funds pursuant to CSA 152 Administrative Services Agreements with the participating cities. The County last collected the assessment in the City in 1994 at a rate of $4.72/BAU/year. A BAU is a “benefit assessment unit” as defined by the County. An owner of a single-family home in the City will pay 1 BAU/year, amounting to $4.72/year. The City Council directed staff to pursue the reinstatement of CSA 152. Non-Single Family parcels will pay based on the number of BAU's they are assessed at, based on land use and parcel size.

Background on CSA 152 NPDES Assessment
LAFCO annexed the City of Banning into County Service Area 152 when the County of Riverside adopted Resolution No. 93-454 (Attachment 2) on December 21, 1993, at the City’s request, in order to have the County place an assessment on property owner’s tax bills to fund expenditures required by the NPDES Permit. On March 22, 1994, City Council Resolution No. 1994-028 (Attachment 3) was adopted to fund the City’s NPDES program, whereby the annual assessment rate for FY 1994/1995 for CSA 152 was set at $4.72 per Benefit Assessment Unit.

On September 27, 1994, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1994-107, approving the Administrative Services Agreement for the CSA 152 Program between the City of Banning and Riverside County. The County had formed CSA 152 to finance portions of its programs and obligations associated with its Municipal NPDES Permit. The Agreement sets forth the responsibilities of the County and City with respect to the assessment. It provides for the City to annually approve a budget and report its activities in connection with its NPDES costs to the City. In addition, the City is responsible for updating parcel information for properties in the City. The County incorporates the City’s budget and the budgets of other participating cities into the County’s CSA 152 budget, holds an annual hearing, approves the assessments, and submits the assessments for collection on the Tax Roll. Both County and City Engineering Division staff performed research, and no records were found showing either party has ever withdrawn from this Agreement. Numerous other cities also joined CSA 152 to ensure funding of their NPDES program. Additionally, it appears that property owners were only assessed in that first year, FY 94/95 and not after. Further research shows that no annual staff reports or resolutions were approved by the City Council to allow for collection of the annual assessment in subsequent years.

Calculation of the CSA 152 Assessment
In late 1993, the County of Riverside annexed the City of Banning into its County Service Area 152. The City, acting through the County and CSA 152, is able to collect an assessment on individual parcels 929
within the City that contain a structure. Each parcel is assigned a certain number of "benefit assessment units" or "BAUs." For instance, a single-family home, regardless of its size, is assigned one BAU, while commercial property is assigned 12 BAUs per acre. One BAU costs the property owner $4.72/year.

Vacant and undeveloped land is exempt, regardless of its land use code.

When CSA 152 was formed, the County determined the formula and methodology to use to calculate the number of BAUs for each type of property. The details and examples of calculations for various land uses are shown on Resolution No. 1994-028 (Attachment 3), starting on page 4 of 12, which is County Ordinance No. 573. A parcel’s land use was used to determine its runoff coefficient and BAU/acre (listed in the table), and the developed (assumed to be impervious) area in acres of the parcel is used to determine the number of BAUs and thus cost per year. A municipal assessment consultant was hired by the City to calculate the BAUs for each parcel to be placed on the Tax Roll.

As an example calculation, a Commercial/Industrial property (see below table, Group A, with 12 BAUs/Acre) that is a 10.0 acre commercial/industrial parcel, with a developed area of 8.0 acres, with a City of Banning BAU rate of $4.72 per year:

No. of BAUs = (Developed Parcel Area) X 12 BAUs/Acre = 8 X 12 = 96 BAUs Therefore, the assessment would be: 96 BAUs X $4.72/BAU = $453.12 per year.

The Table below shows the six (6) categories of land use, their respective runoff factors and the BAU per acre. Note that a single-family residence was used as the basis for one BAU. It is the proportionate runoff from a 1/6 acre or .17 acre property for one BAU and other sized parcels and land uses will have multiples of this basic unit.

Benefit Assessment Unit
Group Land Use Coefficient Factor BAU Per Acre
A Commercial/Industrial 0.8 12
B Apartments/Mobile Homes, Churches, Schools 0.6 9
C Single Family Residential* 0.4 6*
D
Poultry, Irrigated or Cultivated Crops, Vacant or
Undeveloped
0 0
E Golf Courses, Private Parks 0.0067 0.1
F Parcels with Miscellaneous Structures 0.0033 0.05
*For simplicity, all single family residential properties regardless of the size, have been assigned 1 BAU.

Additional Public Outreach Performed since the fall of 2024 On September 24, 2024, a workshop was presented by the Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer and the City Council decided that they would like to pursue reinstating the CSA 152 assessment. The staff report and related documents are included as Attachment 4. A public participation and community outreach phase occurred in October and November of 2024 to let the residents and property owners know of public meetings held with the Public Works Dept. to explain the CSA 152 assessment and its purpose with regard to providing funds for the NPDES Program, further described in the December 10, 2024 staff report in Attachment 5.

Two recent outreach presentations were given as follows:
• Chamber of Commerce Executive Meeting, March 3, 2025 from 11 to noon • Banning Public Library Open House, March 13, 2025 from 4 to 5 pm Flyers advertising the Open House and containing important facts, a FAQ Fact sheet, and the CivicSpace project website and the City’s website’s Stormwater page were updated. The Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer presented the PowerPoint presentation and answered any 930
questions the public had at the two events. Overall, the feedback from the public has been neutral or supportive of reinstating the CSA 152 stormwater assessment.

Consultant Contract
A Request for Proposals (RFP) 24-086, “Municipal Assessments Services to Reinstate County Service Area (CSA 152) Stormwater Assessment”. was prepared to hire a municipal district financing consultant firm. This RFP Scope of Work provides for preparing the required Assessment/Levy Report to determine the number of benefit assessment units (BAUs) for each property within the City, identify which parcels within the City are eligible to be assessed and prepare any required assessment documents. On December 10, 2024, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-197, awarding the professional services contract to Webb Municipal Finance, LLC in the amount of $19,650, which includes a 10% contingency and updating the City Council on outreach efforts (shown as Attachment 5). The City may elect to utilize this firm to update the Assessment Roll over the next four years if the work cannot be done in house.

CSA 152 Agreement with Riverside County
The CSA 152 NPDES Agreement with the County of Riverside was updated for all participants and on January 14, 2025, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-02, approving the execution of the CSA 152 Agreement with Riverside County (shown as Attachment 6). The Agreement states that the City Council must approve the NPDES budget and approve the BAU assessment/levy rate of properties within the City of Banning each fiscal year, with multiple budget years allowed.

Therefore, the City Council must approve the NPDES budget and current assessment rate/levy of $4.72/BAU for FY 2025/2026 and FY 2026/2027. The City will then need to provide the County with the list of Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) to place on the FY 2025/2026 Tax Roll by mid-May of 2025. As stated above, cities must provide any updates/additional parcels from new development annually to the County. In addition, the City is responsible for updating parcel information for properties in the City. The County incorporates the City’s budget and the budgets of other participating cities into the County’s CSA 152 budget, holds an annual public hearing, approves the assessments, and submits the assessments for collection on the Tax Roll. The County collects an Administrative Fee of 6% of the revenues collected for this work.

JUSTIFICATION:

If adopted in late 2025, the upcoming 2025 NPDES Permit will become effective in early 2026 and it has new and enhanced requirements that will significantly impact the City financially, as additional computer software, trash capture devices, consultant costs and City staff time will be needed.

FISCAL IMPACT:

CSA 152 provides a funding mechanism for the NPDES program. Eleven cities, including Palm Springs, Rancho Mirage, and Desert Hot Springs also joined CSA 152 to ensure funding of their NPDES program.

Since assessments have not been collected from properties in the City since 1994, the funding source for the NPDES program has been absorbed by City of Banning Streets Department (Fund 100). The Public Works Deptartment, Streets Division, assists with the implementation and Engineering Division staff manages the NPDES program in-house. Consultants are utilized for Water Quality Management Plan and Erosion Control Plan review (the developer pays these fees through deposits) and for NPDES stormwater and industrial waste inspections. The NPDES program costs the City over $300,000 annually to manage the current NPDES Permit. Those costs are expected to be higher with the new permit given the new mandates. The municipal special district financing consultant, Webb municipal Finance, LLC determined that the estimated revenue to be collected from the CSA 152 assessment is approximately $80,000/year, which will help with the NPDES program costs. Stormwater program responsibilities are completed by about ten (10) Public Works Dept. staff members on a part-time and as-needed basis, but there are no full-time staff assigned to the program.
931
The estimated budget for FY 2025/2026 to comply with the NPDES Permit is about $355,000 and for FY 2026/2027 it is estimated to be $425,000 due to the new 2025 Permit requirements previously described (asset inventory, cost reporting analysis, urban pesticides and trash capture devices). The FY 2025/2026 NPDES budget of $355,000 is comprised of: Permit costs ($18,000 to the RCFCD for the Task Force and $19,000 to the SWRCB); street sweeping ($135,000); storm drain maintenance ($30,000 in Public Works staff costs); commercial and industrial facilities inspections ($40,000 in consultant costs) and Permit compliance ($113,000 in Public Works Dept. staff costs for Program Management, construction and City facilities inspections, public outreach, staff review of: WQMPs, land development projects, business licenses, SWPPPs and WDIDs).

In anticipation of the upcoming new 2025 NPDES Permit cost/fiscal reporting requirements, a new stormwater fund Account 105 was created to track expenses. The expenses and revenue collected from the CSA 152 assessment will be budgeted into the 105-6100-455.33-11 account.

ALTERNATIVES:

If the City Council elects not to approve this Resolution, there will be no CSA 152 stormwater assessment collected on the FY 2025/2026 or FY 2026/2027 Tax Roll. The NPDES Program would continue to be an unfunded mandate, with no revenue collected to support the program, and its costs would continue to be absorbed by the Streets Fund. The new 2025 NPDES Permit has significant costs associated with it and will continue to rise over the future. The NPDES Permit must be complied with to avoid fines from Regional Board No. 7 of the State Water Resources Control Board.

BUDGETED?:

No
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT:

No
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 2025-42, CSA Stormwater Assessment.docx

2. County Reso. No. 93-454, formation of CSA 152, 12.21.93.pdf

3. CC Reso No. 1994-028, approving initial CSA 152 rates, 3.22.94.pdf

4. CSA 152 Reinstatement, 9.24.2024 Workshop Packet,.pdf

5. Award Contract to Webb Reso. 2024-197 Agenda Packet.pdf

6. Approve CSA 152 Agreement Reso. 2025-02 Agenda Packet.pdf 932
Resolution 2025-42

RESOLUTION 2025-42

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE COUNTY SERVICE AREA 152 STORMWATER ASSESSMENT AND BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEARS 2025/2026 AND 2026/2027, FOR NATIONAL POLLUTANT

DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT RELATED EXPENSES
WHEREAS, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) is a federally mandated program to control non-point sources of runoff pollution and the NPDES program is part of the Clean Water Act enacted by Congress in 1987. The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin, Region No. 7, in implementing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s storm water NPDES permit program, requires that the Districts and Incorporated Cities within the Whitewater River Basin obtain a joint permit to discharge storm water into the various storm channels and washes throughout the Whitewater River Watershed area; and WHEREAS, the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) and Riverside County are acting as the Lead Agency with the City of Banning being a co-permittee, along with the various other agencies and municipalities located within the Whitewater River Basin. The new 2025 NPDES Permit will cost the City much more to implement due to its new requirements; and
WHEREAS, in order to generate revenue for the program, the City Council was requested to consider reinstating a “grandfathered” assessment from 1994, called the County Service Area (CSA) 152 NPDES assessment and this stormwater assessment is currently collected by the County on behalf of a number of participating cities via property tax bills; and WHEREAS, on September 10, 2024, a CSA 152 Stormwater Assessment workshop was presented by the Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer and the City Council directed staff to pursue reinstating the CSA 152 assessment; and
WHEREAS, a public participation and community outreach phase occurred in October and November of 2024 and again in March of 2025 to let the residents and property owners know of public meetings held with the Public Works Department to explain the CSA 152 NPDES assessment and its purpose with regard to providing funds for the NPDES Program; and WHEREAS, the CSA 152 Agreement (used by all member agencies) with the County of Riverside was updated by the County and was given to staff in mid-November of 2024 for City staff and City Attorney’s Office review; and
WHEREAS, on December 10, 2024 the City Council approved Resolution No. 2024-197 awarding a consultant contract to Webb Municipal Finance, LLC to prepare the Assessment Roll to reinstate CSA 152 stormwater assessments for FY 2025/2026; and WHEREAS, on January 14, 2025 the City Council approved Resolution No. 2025-02, which approved the execution of the CSA 152 NPDES Stormwater Assessment Agreement between Riverside County and the City of Banning related to the CSA 152 NPDES Stormwater Assessment collected from the City of Banning; and
WHEREAS, the CSA 152 NPDES Stormwater Assessment Agreement requires that each City adopt a Resolution approving the levy and rate of its Benefit Assessment Unit per Fiscal Year 933
Resolution 2025-42

and the estimated budget per Fiscal Year for its stormwater management system, and the revenues collected for CSA 152 NPDES will be used solely for the purpose of capital costs, maintaining and operating the City’s storm drain and flood control system, including complying with the NPDES Permit.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. Based upon the facts set forth herein, the City Council finds that CSA 152 NPDES charges are assessments that confer benefits upon each parcel pf property subject to the assessments. Pursuant to Section 5 (a) of Article XlllD of the California Constitution, the CSA 152 NPDES assessment is exempt from the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 4 because it existed before the effective date of Article XlllD, and the assessment is imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs, maintenance and operation expenses related to the flood control and drainage system of the City. The annual assessment does not exceed the maximum assessment established when CSA 152 was created.

SECTION 2. The City of Banning requests that the Riverside County Board of Supervisors impose the CSA 152 assessment on properties within the City of Banning per the methodology outlined in the CSA 152 Agreement at the rate of $4.72/BAU for the Fiscal Years 2025/2026 and 2026/2027.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of March, 2025.

Sheri Flynn, Mayor
City of Banning
ATTEST:

Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk
City of Banning
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

John Pinkney, Interim City Attorney
Slovak, Baron, Empey, Murphy & Pinkney,
LLP
934
Resolution 2025-42

CERTIFICATION:

I, Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2025-42, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 25th day of March, 2025 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk
City of Banning, California
935
936
937
938
RE.80LUT10B OF THE CITY COONCIL 07 ~HE CITY 07 BANWIBG
BBTT:IlfQ B..I..TEA POll. iC:OUJfT'i 8 ERVI:C B Alt n 1 !ii :2 • TO l"UMD CITY~s NATlQl(AL POLLUTAN1' DISCHARGE ELIMIBJ,.TIOK BYSTEII (lfPDl:8> PROOUX
WHER.EM 1 th~ coun~y of Riv~rside, by it~ Re~olution No. 9]-4~4 adopted December Z l r 151 '9 J I a:n11e'.li.'.1Bd the City of Ela nn iri,g to its county service Ar~a (CSA) 152 8t the City'a r~qoest to meet the Environme~t~l PrD~ectian Agency 1 s requirement to obtain opQrating perm.its for discharges .fram storm drain. ,e;;ye-tems and to pay tor anticipat~d p~oje~~ costs that place~ an a~5ess=ent on prop~rty own~rs' t~x bills ~o fund expenditures required by tho permit, and WBBR:D.B 1 City ~t~ff has estimat~d th~ storrowater management pl"'cgra11:1 .l"'@:qui:r-~111.@ints will cost the City approx il"Clately $53 t 60-0 annually; and
WHD!U , a II Be:n e.t it Ass ess:me-n t Unit 11 i :s defined in. the River a i cle Co\lnty F 1 ood Control and w a te:r c-ons-erv at 1 on Di :s:t.r i ct Ma~ua1 1 ~he por~ion of ~hich defining Benefit ~sse~~nent ~nit is attach~d as ~li.hibit l an.d by this refeTence ~~de a part hereof; and WBER.D.B, this City council has determin.ect, based on ~taff's calculations, that &nnual ~ssessments are anticipated to be $4T7~ per Benefit Asssssment Unit.

Mo•1 THERBFORB BE IT RESOLVEC by the City Cou~cil of the City Qf Banning th~t the annual ass~ssment rate for fisoal year l994-9S for CSA l52 - Banning i~ hereby set ~t $4T72 per Benerit Ass~ss~~~t Unit.

PA.8 S.J::C I APDOVED, AN:O ADOP'l"!D
th:.~ -~itlj d"J of KDr:,t.
~~~~1-L=---
r lifornia
939
~TTEST:
"&~ - .~._J)~~½~
L~cille M. Eli~ondo '
City Clerk of the City Of
Banning. California
APPROVED AS TO FO.RN!
.AND L CONTENT
Joh/ . Wil~on, Esq.
city 11.ttorney

CERTIFICATION
I.. L~c:il le M. Elizondo, C:i ty Clerk ot tha City of Banning t Califo~nia, do hereby certify that the for~going Re~olution No. 1994-28. w-as duly ~d.opted by the City counc:i 1 of the city of aanning, California, ~ta Reg~lar Meeting the~eof held on the 22th day of March, 1994, by the following vote, to wit;
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Counc~Tmambe~~ AnQ~rson, Lewis~ Wi1li~~s~ Mayfrr Reyno1ds Co :m c: i T rnernbe r- Sm1 th Non"='
None
-2-
~ _J;~ 1-"'k..& /4uclfu M. Eli~ondo
• City Cle-rk. 1 City ot Banning
California
940
1 • • • • I • • J . J1 I" 11 • I • I • •• "." li'-"I' ." I Q:llP1NIIGI ~o. ~71, alJ"J'IDBiiJ ?OR cs.a.~
"!'he purpa EH! t, i t. hi !.l: i:..::irdi nane• is to ~i III t.ati 1.i ~ h .::i. '!,:Ix ~"!Jaure r. Dr "t ne I evy ,1nd collection ~t cn~r-g@a tor e~tenaeci gOV€1rll.mentai ~ervic~ p~ovidcd in : ~• ~ 11 n t. y ! 1-,'!ZV i..,c: e areas . undl!! r t hj! au 1: r.o.r it y o.t t: he County s el.."'V"ice I..r,e.a wv ~s 3et !or~~ in Gove~n!ll8nt ~ooe 5ecti0n l~J10+l et. seq. T~ chargee e~tablisbed hP.~under Hhall be l~v;~d ta p~y in wnoJ~ er part. the coBt ~f ~.1:i:-V'iding- a;uct c.ct.eqded. gi:iv.rnm&trt~l i;i:.::.cv ie-it~.

B_~H'U l'l" M:P:!H HN52T UHl~ .. (DAV) D!CrnPPWIP AllD NK'l'!lopm.oor •~·he .i;:i o, i!!' l!l :sJ11an t c: cm.pu.tation Ii:lli;!!'t.,h.Qd.olo~ 'i cidopted. f :;::t" ":.:!:l,i a CS.A i• t ha BALI :.i..t h.O<i .J.-ve l tlpea by ~l.! ve~~ id• ..;ou.n.t y F 1 uud C-on. 't. r cl n lr; t. t:-ict r Thi~ IC.E!lt~oo spr~ads th~ total asees~t to pan:::e1s witQin tho bmt@~~t ,i,l,:i,.1111 ~!!'JI !!il:m.en.,:. ..u-e-a in propo.IT..i,.on to eaii:h p;;&-" ~•d ' ~ rune f f • RQ.11.Q ff iEli Lill!:tormi.1110:d by tir:et .lcnowinq a. pare~l • s ::Ji:e in -1::11ereg it.s .pre:i;unt lia.nd ;,,ia e ( blC ident i al - Cc.,ai11111~l (.:! i ;1 l ~ l nd.u :!lt:r i:a.1 1 c..::tc- + J "'n.d t~-&n aas-i~Riag a runoff fM,1;t,;;1,- t. u i t..m. g ll:~ra.i l :iind U•• c • t,i;;iqq ry ~ Rt1noi f f &c-tora ara ~~ti.ma.tea of h~ mu.~h ~alnfnll ~Mn~ ~ff~ pa..rcEi ln ~map~riaon to ~he ,:),-=:i;:iur.t of t:a.1.nfall that .±a.11 on a pa.rc:&l. ln other -..rord., tho :r:-unci:ff f .1eti::i-r i.1. ~ lili'ay of -P.xpre !!'JI~ inq th• t:e l Iii ii.. .i vt~ Ll~ ree of .i.uiyy,:, Y loiu enc & s o:f pl! rc-1! 1:s with dif rerc-nt l:1.nd UH-ii r Pav~ aM i.mprO"t.Nii!d pa.re-el• h.av. r~~off factors closer to 1~0 (wha~~ l~O qquala 100, runc±f) than d~ u n p.!!ved or unimproved parce.l;!!!' . R.mic ing the la.rge ntl:ftlbitr of l and n 5-e'!I in l l,11'.1 C-a uQty to :s iJ:; gi,r..e.ral G"at.er;JQri "" f a-r:: e Elitima:tin.g nanoff under th:e 1-,nefit aaBeae.ant pn;icl!du~ pxO"l"'id~• ford Il'lllna~ai5ble Gild rtH11aonable cga:;ip~t~LiQQ :in,sthoor
r\,~ ~he National Pollut..tJ,..nt Dlsehtu;q~ Klimination Sy~te~ !NPDES} P~QlgL.f:llil ~ddition~l t~~o~ hav~ h@~n br::0nght in to ~he a.n.aiyai5 wnich cona.ider ,:.;. hit, t. ype o:f a.ct i v.i ty oc. t h.&t .laud u•~ . 'fhi s ti,.roqrillR ,i,. ;c11quirlltd by .Fic-d.eral Riegull!I t; i1:m t c- f C>C"ns i t11 attention on urbi!ID.i :t:l!!d i!lrei!I& or d~v~lerpmeirtto a:n:d. to ~~eluck! ~~ic~ltu~Al propertiea. T~e;t"f;!!fQ6e &g:s; i cul tu.ca 1 .inid. ,,, .w.on t. und~Vflllr:-pt!lld. proi:iertie:e hl!IVC: been cc.,mpl a.tit! l:, -:-:: :.e.Dp-t ed f ;r;Qm a e: 1J@1l!!u!lments @'lr'E!! r:: ~hou,gh t: hey obv i O'll.l!lil y ;nay ll,l!!lvr;!I sUDl!!II !lll'lount of cupcff_
Tha CC>.m£lutation ◊f th~ aa•••aat11~~ f~r a.ny parc6l i~ b~od on the nu:aibe~ e,f BAIJ18: .a. ■ 1i:iqn ad. to that pan:-el. A .sic.(] le-f ami.l y re:aidant i.ll.l :pari=:cl. of 7,ioo ~qua.rB re&t (1/6 acre) in si~e Yith a runoff f~cto~ ot ~.40 vaa s~le~tlll!PQ. ~~ tha starui.ar~ BAU. Th• naJU:1111tr uf BAUe for a~y oth.ec parcel ca11 hft ....--:ampll teci by :r.e lat. i.ngi it 11, s.i..%:11- ..!IL.mi 1.l!lind: u 51,e 'CD tha .BAU as of;lg i.c: r .1 bed under the headin,g ~ C"a!IIJ!lnta.t: ion of TJni ts I:~ E:ill.C'h [' ill'Clllll'" ~ Aljla.i.11, t..11.11- p~i;i:n;:iipl• i.a.volvwd. L• :i-r,l~ti:aq 1111 t.oaii ruag:f f to t.M- aPQ11at. of .i.ape~i.ou:1111 ~• p~••11t. ( aic:t.~l 4...,...,1,oped aoniiA?) a J.
941
I, • I" i.u • I_I . • II I . I . : ..:....,._. ..... _._.

The ~....bl~ Lo~ow Gr.owD ~he~,;...~ ~~~8~Qcico ~c l~ng u~c~ G.:lQ~~ ~~~~c~iv~ =unoff =actor~ at'lri the ~AU pex uc.u-.

IIJIRti il!a.llSm8~ WITS
,~------------~-----~-----~-~------~---
1 GROUP 1 t J\N n 1,~'R FAC'?OniPER AeJ{E
I A 1 Camme:cci.al .. _ Irtdu.etr:la l
~ ~part.!aent5/Mobi~e Hean!!! Far~~~Chnrch~g,Sebaolc
I
~ Sinqle-f.u\..ilv P~~identul
0 Pault.r-vrirrigated/Cultivatied. ~toD~,
Li'7EIBtock~Vacant UnQ.CV•loped
I!: Golf ~aU:t"!!Je.-S • 1•:ri v~te Pl!llr kB
f" Pa.rec.la- with Mi.ll!Pc ~ i.l an,oou.a .S t.r';.lctl.1rl!!!':is UlVLEI
CIOUP ~ - CQIIKIKC:IAL /IKDU:11:t'lll:IJU.
"i.and Utle i:.:ooeEi: C 1 - Comm.ere ia1 1Jr-opert:i.lills

0.:80
r,_ ~o
! o~ 40
0-rOU
o~oo,n
0,003.:)
CL - Commercial Hui~d..i.:nqs on ieaEietl 1.a...c.a.

GROUP 8 - A,f'U.1!111:r.--t"-8 1111 /dla.1L& !IOMIJ .PA:aPi., C:IIURCEE8 • SCIIOQL5 I.~nd u ~e cadlll • : CA - A.[)l!!,rt 1IU:tnt Bu.i ldl ng:, \ 4 fJr mo;i;- s: un..i I. s l Cl - Chu. .. ~h...-111;
HP - llnbi.le Elcme Rental .E"u-k , 3 nr mare J.:n.i t~ ~ Rl - Ap,e,rtiNn~ suildinga t4 o~ :ir:,o~~ unit~!
SC - S~haola
0-ltDlJll' C ~ S llfGLZ-rAittL'I ftES"IDD'I' [Ali
Land UAe cod.ea : Alt - Aqr i-cu.l tu.r~l Ree idant.i,1],J. 0 .. 10
0 .. 05
CR - Sin~l-e-Pa.mily Rc~idcnti~l ~, or ie•• unit~)
Mr I.ndivid.ualiy owned p&-re~l with n.obile hamc::i
.HO - Indivi~ually r;,,m,.d p~~P-1 ~ith :r=io:bil~ ~a.

MP - Nobila Hone on lsa6Rd. 1~.:t.

PR - R..aeidantul on a~ricult~ra.1. pr~~e.rv~
Rl - Sin~ie-~a.m.i1y R~sid•ntial
R2 - RaB~dential t2 or 3 un~~c~
~c ~ CQndomJ.n.i.um.a w~eh priv4la ~nL.c:y
RD - Cond.csi.nLums with common ant.r:i. 9
RI - SingJ.e-,t-"mn.i.1 y .Ne !Ii ~:nt: i a 1
rut - :nd.i vi du.al. l y ,ownoo mub.i 1 liill h0att lot. [-rn - S i n9 l II;!'-!'"t\lllil y .t-i:e~~~t: ia 1
RX - Rxc:::eptiDnal ~~~ident~al
GROUP R - GOLP COURU,. PRIVATE PUKB
Liana U~~ ~Qde~~ C5 - CelM!t~~~~~ {B~cludiu~ nQR-p~0fit) GC - Go 1 f -.~-aura~
GR.OUP ,- - PAaCBLS ,r1n xracrnn:ooa s~
Lat1.d. U:!!!f!I Code:!! :: AS - 1lacl!l.nt with .m.i:l!!I ce llan•cn.1:m: !iitrnctar e Y'S - l.4I.1.-c! with ;,d• i;-..-11 aneott u tit :c-u:t=tl.l.:c-c i;-n 1 y i::XAl!rpi e::s :i: old f 0'Llndat i-01111 , p(mp hou:1e :s or :!; hoed iii; 1Tot. .i.o ue-o942
..• ,. . • •. I ' I •• · .. I •• I • I - •=...:....:.I • .

CQ.HPUT.MI Pl: Qf YIU.S f"Oa .t"'-WU PA..Y'J!:
;:.!i- -i:::rev i.uui.. iy :!Jt.-c."t-ea, t.h¥ .RAU l :II tb.,e, p;cuportiono:t.-e n.:i:nQ;ff :frOJ:L &. ain.gi11tf.!l.l!!Lly 1~£id~nLiai ~~rc•l with~~ «~•a oi l/5 (~.171 ~cce. O~huc aiz~ ~:.a~c~l~ ~rw J~~d us~ c~t~iv& ~ill haY• .multip!~~ 9L ~be b~¥i~ u:-i.it+ Or:e l 1 } Unit -= t O. 1 ·1 A.ere J X ( S 1 ri,;1 Qo-F a.mi ly .M:&llil id 1iii1 n. t.ia l Ru.no! f .t·actor I
OI:"p
For ~~ i :mp l : c-i ty .::i.11 ~ ihig:.::_ t.:: - ! a.au.I y ril!!!'ll!!I ident.i.a.l 1,;il:. i:.;ipt'.! r t".ii:!111 reqB rdl!!!:.SS -of ~i%~ h~vn be&n ~~s~gned l B~U.
'rM numb~r ,.;if. a.ase:r:: :IUN:n.t. unit. B
ta.mi 1 y D!!!1u.ch11 n tial l a.r-g-lil.r tb.a..o
folloving ~quation:
f o.:c All pa.re"'-= l. $
,j. l 7 .l.cr-&Ei I i:a ( c;:,th.e-r t.b4tl; s iCl.c;l.lEI - det.e:rmt:n111Pd by t.n..

N~r o t Uni t.5 - ( A,r, e:~ o1 P&rC@l__ln ~.r•I t x £ R\,LQOf f F-Gc_:t:_or; l ()n fl t~a:1111 .1.c .A s:s:&& &lllE!n 1:. uni. t
~Q-.;;i;p A ;I: (;~r-cial ~ l~uatri al.

Rn.no££ ra~l.Qr - ~.ijO
nAU!ill • ( Area of Pa.:ccial O~"'l¢p,Qd I x 12 DAU/ Aere Orou.p B :i: ~111t-'1 t Nal::il.9 ._, Pa.riu., Cb.urc,.li,e11-, 8Cll:COJ..a kunof t :t:a:ctor - -0. lliQ
JlA.Us • ( A.r"!td of Parce,L Deve iop:i:,,i l X '1 BAU/ A.c:::re O.raup C ~ Sii:Lgi.e-Pa..i ly H-iii!I-Ual
.Runoff FiltC'tDr ~ 0.40
.B.A~e • (.11 Al':l.re•i X ~ BAU/Mte
.POul~.E"]', 1rrigat.d cropa. ::-altivatlliHil ~o~•, aairie•, L.iv•at~ ~!i1Vd.im9 rll'da. V.a.c:am~ und•••loped
iHH:i!".11 t Fa.e"t.or = 0. {10
BAOa = {1.00
G.vu:; IS.: CklJ.f Cou..r8-a ■ , :P:riY•t• Pan:1
RunQff Eactl).r • OrOg67
BAU& = (Are.a. of .r.a:rc:1111 DBVsl u.p,ad l X CJ . IO RAU/ Ac r 1111 i:.1:s,;11,1.p f': Pa.re• ls w.i. t:lb. m.i:acaila:DeOU• •truct111 ~• R~~ciff Fa~t0r • o~~Oll
rum~ • ( Ar~a. of Paree l o~ 2..cp~ l x □ _ O:'!i R.Jl,tl / Aer@ T"
943
• ._ I-_._ ,1 _. _L,. r • I 1 I 1-.".J •. I 11 1 I I . I .U:... !QlU:1.11 9t' :CXfICJLL ~B.Mlll'S
A.35L,Jtu:::; i\ l ,o • 0 .acre ~-oaatll re i al Ii nd.L.l.~ t: t: i al pa.r"1 el ...-.1th A. d~'WI toped a.t:cu, of ~ . o ~e~e:s wh i.:::h l:a:s: a 8AU rat.• o t. S 4 • O C p,r 'Y'C i::tr:
?-.'o 4 of :BA'Us ... ~ Oev'l!-J.op@d Fa.:r.ii;:1:11 Area) X 1. i .aA "D / .:\crll!' • a X 1~ = ~6 ilAOS
~berefor~, th• ~&ae~sma~t ~Qa1Q li,w!;
ASSUM!:
96 BA.U~ i S4,00/-SAU - $lS~~aO pe+ vea~
Pu-Jes (Qz-Qup ►
A iOa~ acre l'llOhiie home park witn a d~va~oped 4:rca 0£ a.o acros ~bi~b haa a BAU rat~ Qf $4aO0 '.EJ'B.r ye~~
Ho. ~f BAU~= <De~•lcpod. P~t:t.:e1 Are~) X j BAU/Ac;::re z S.O ~, ~ ?2 BAU& T.a,erefore, ~ho •s~sae~r.~ ~~~ld b~~
72 HA.Us~ ,~~/SAU = S2B8.GO Ptlr Yfta~
l ~ RtliOutial { G~p C!,
ASSOMK:= A 10,~ 4Clre ~inqle-fam..ily ~•aidential paTcAl u Vhi..c:h MB 4 MU ratt! of S4~u0 per ~a~~
tio • ci f .BAU-u - C o . 1 ·, iu::r,ii,• , X 6 UAU / Ac r:t':. • 0 . 1 "l ,:: 6- -:: 1 RAU
·i·ti.eret ore.. the as:1.-• ~t 'liicold b•::
1 DAU X S4.0O/BAU ~ S4.0C per year
4, f:W~ltry. Irrigatlfd C~cpt. Cµltiyated Crop•, n•lu••~ :t.iu•ts,c.k. Vacant. Up4ftl:1:1Pnsl ( Group D-)
ASSmnt;: A 1 a • Cl ll!it:re P D1J 1 t.::r;y parc!al wb ic:b ::..iii.A :-.■ rei:!r:iaasndad iY.,U c,. t.o of $4.00 per yeor4
~o , o.f BA.Os = ( .oevel0pea Pa;s;c...,l lU"oa l .x. o ~u / Ac.re ~ lD.O XO - 0 RAU&
?hereforer the aese~~aent would be:
0 UAU X St,00/:6.AU: $0.00 per year
944
I • I ._ . ,• •J I I . .. I • I I .. - .... I I r1 I I I . ._IL. s ~ col :f :C:PiUf:!l k ;:ariyata i"ar.k.111_ c t;L"Ou.p £) ~ lOrO a~r~ G,:.,lf CQU~~~ or ~rtvate ~ar~ W~th ~ dev~lopeci c1.rei!II CJ ~ u . u .c1:c.;: • I..! a-: ..., i'1: ~ c.b hal!I a .rec-i::amend~d IlAJl .-a t.e a:f ~ 4 . 0 G par y~a.r:;:
~o + ·-..J f BAUi; = ~ Devl!l loP1!"ri ~~ roe l At'ea } x. u L l ll B.n.ll / kra = 840 X 0.10 = 0.80 n.AU~
'L'her.,f r;;i,.411 , t b.e o:1.s s.e:s:smeo t. 111~ld b1t:
oLa~ BAUs X $4.Cg/MU - Sl~20 pee year
A 1a.o a.o~~ p,iicecl witb 8.o MreB of old lV'Und~tiona, or pump h¢1l11•• n.gt ooaupit1d t')r bain~ u•11:id whi&h he.:11 ,1, .-~nde-d. BAU rat~ of S!~nO ~£ year,
Ne • of .BA.Us • { nev•J.opaa. P-a..rot!!!l A.rlNI ) i:: Ct + 0 S IiALF / AQ~e - 8.0 X Or05 ~ -40 BAU~
Tl-.erefore 1 ~he Q~~u~3~cnt -wcald t:J,,e:

O ~ 4 0 BJ\Ua x $ ii • co/ RAU 1111 $- l. t:i O p~:i- yftar Th~ KMBBwument 3ystem. is de•igne-d. to id~ntify ~n.d. ec:apute a.a••-~~ u:n. '"'~PICI.L'" propert .i.Q!I c lo&e ly meeting t. bo:s~ l~d ~ ee d••er iption• . How r tha BJ!lltam i• flexible ~~o~g~ t.o acc~mm.adate ~it~tia~~ w.tu.ch rlo n~~ m&et the a~erage or typical JAlild ~8~ wi~hi..:i the a cateqo.z:ie!jl:, In thas• inatl!!lOC~5 ~z:IC':lnlo.- RULSS-~ have~~ eat&blisn•d to ~rO?"ide .a c::1C:rn;; i &tlB.,l;lt. ~t; hDd lu , 1\1'~ 1:iia t• t hDli!ia pr(lperti 1..u11 .. 1 . RV P&t' ks havinq i~~ s~n.1 l uccu~t i.on 'lifi 11 ~ve- l!I. !i 0% reduct.ion rate. appJind. to tn~ ~alcuJ.ated as,oc*:ruiin~
2 r .E1fen t:t.tough .1g r ie~l t:u.ra l p.!1.rca J :g: r11:r@o 1111D!!impt ~ ;t1.in'S le-ta.ail y rC'Gi1.fou t.la1 un.i t on • .,,n agrt.eul t ur~..L pa.rc!r3l i e: ;;iot examp't ~nci. will b11;11 aeaeBBed at t~o normal ~ingl~-faaily ~eaident~al ~•l~ulation .3 ~ JU::. va.c:an t /undavl!:! loped l .1utd i !!'I ~.xe:mpt: regard,l••• ot t.h.a .land use e¢d.• 4 • All. ai,g~ ic u l .._:i.:i:.1. a.1. pa.:t"tie.1.a. .llQ ~t., packing IEi.n@d:ll O:t' sto:t"agit1 bu.ildi~q_. ti.•fil in c:ot1jUnQt.i.on witli th111 oit"w'ricultural dc::'t:i.v:i.t.y :a.~ ~x,amp,t
S • I :Qdian Fedora.l 1il!nd G .-..n.d Bt.u:·e-atJ a f Land Mana~BIQIIJD-t land~ a.z::111 ozampt., bmiiavei; I~ l.i.nd• l ll;!!l!l•~ t:o non-I .ad.ian azi.ti t.Lu; wi lb. a t.rnc t.iires ar11 not ex-ampt
945
.-••." I . . " 1 '-1 . I • ,1,._. ,. ". 1 I 1• 1 •.·.· 1··1•"-l_i LL " 0 I • 11-I •• ,,
MLQCJU:UJU rstl -r.?PICAL CM 1~; 81-JY!:Hln' ort
= a~ ~roµi.;: r r.:. y civnl!"!r:,. ~h~ f oe.l 1. hat tha i r par~ol doe-s not .m.~~ ~- t.h~ 'tTJ;il..i.ca 1 si t1;1.a. t ion I a t:iy Bt~ f 0-r iP:v-a.i 11a. tion h~,i; Le-en -ll:as ta.bl i e:hea ~ l f:t i ng t.h• J. ollowlng Sample f'"o;r;:m to t."l!!!'-P.Va lua t:411 -' pr-op.tty CJlr{D'llr I B CSl,i,

15.2 i:J.IJ 15-eB eimen t , City i:. taf :t :1b00.ld t1 [email protected] if tba ~ •h•:am111nt i • i:ncor t c:::i;,; l by ..c•v l.Erwi..ciq afl!lri6l ?,nct-o s or hy field. fa::i.~pec-t..i.cm l.f neeefl:••ryT
'l'h• irtVi!II l 1.1ation f-OPII i.::: ou ld ~ p:r°"igad to th. §J.1 os:rt:1.rcy owner by tM.i.l or inada availahla at tne ~Q~n~ar. 'l'he ~op h-lf Qt tu f~~m (Prope:tty Int~tioPI ean bo complated by ~h• ~ropcrr.y mmer ~ftd! mailed b&c.k to statf o~ ~~fo:r:zatiQn ~an be gatti~red hy ~~aff ove~ the t&lBIJhoo•~ ~h~ Mt'.tt'.lm half ot: th-I! far.11111 i!il: fcir -at•ff use to Tec:or,;f tht: infDaJ6t.ion a.bout t.h.e propi,r:t:y gAth,a:reri du.ring th-1!11 eva.l -u:,1 t ior. whi~ ia n8G!e:s~ tQ d-eterm:i ne j f "' c or roic-c &d aaBBBl!llaiietn.t i m: ne,c c-21sary. '0\l••tio.aa ratJU"d.i.a.gl th.41 .r-e-eyaJ.u.at.J.ara ~roeed11:11ra DaJ' .ba ofii~e,i t:.1;1 a .:r1:11d.7 flat t.•r lCIIIHi
( H9) 21 !w-llitNJI
:Spae.:lal Pt"Ogztalb il!llik:f: .4.oa
-.1 ni:t-aJ.de ca..-ty l:"nm:lllpori.a:t.i~il Dapa..rtmi11:1. t Coapl•tClld (o;raa a~uuld htll ~ltad to:
fU......-•id• CC)lm.ty h-aa•P9-1'1:,atioa O.p&~t
1695 S)race S~N•t
R:!. va-.ra:.ii:ie , ca 9':Z!iio7
•~~~t J-1lcl~ wa~t•rl~IUI
946
. .... I • 1° I . ., . • • I .1·• "-· L .... I • ._ ' • • ,:sa 1s:2
ASS~SSM..IQr.r :8.E-EVALUATlON
.A.5S~5SOR PARC~L NO•----~----
FOB s:w:::, YU OllJ,J
.. .. ..:....:.u ...... _.

CATB ____ _
~ARCEL ~lmA~ ____ ....._AC....,. • ...._ DEVBLOPED AC'RH&iE~-----......:;A~C~1:...- PRO.f.E:RTY EV.ALUA".l"IOfi =. .ABJUAJ. :PR'OTO ·---~ SITE VISIT' ___ ~-- P~OF!RTY OBSCRII'TION/COt4MENTS __ ~_
ass:e;s§MEN!: ~T.A
8A.O / 111 TJKVKLOPl!J[I ~ $ RATE
AC!l.B AC.RB.ACE /Mu
I: ;
:I I I ! i I
r I
,
l i
[. I
I - - . - -
• L '-
I
-
Rl!!:COkMm'IDED CORPJICT!D AS ~fi.SSNE"NT _,c....__----~ CSA 152 t1JJtD IIUIIILD.
• APPROl:IMTE DBWLOPE.D ACRKAGE ROIJ'ND!:D TO T~ ~ST HlJJtDiUI IJT"I FOR "1'1"I6 CAI.CULA.'rZ:Olf.

QUXSl'IOllS R.KCAR.D:nfG 'I .B!.S ASSESSMf!N'I' 1 l"'lrBASE C0Ni'I'1'.C'l' ::

I
947
" I I • • .J - .. . , ,, I ~:. .:.li.J'"4 J . J I • • J. i'B:OCIIS!IlfG g,a .15,2 :.asumonn RB-rmw,:nOlfd :nqt'!I ::io_ "cltOnRn ;u STNIIBIS,fiT5 BS.Jll'G HJUJ.,lm { Batara sapt~r, :t.} l:'l!Cl-~v,lua.tion t~ :.ib.oii.l.!J Lrc~ 1·.ub.nittc-d to tho 5pecial Frcql.uae 5oation uf the- ~r,;,1,.mty 'I'ran.sportatior;i L)e~'.lliJt:"t..l'ICnt". p: i .. n · Lu p.ro~ct._y l.1x: :1:Jtatenents tioei n~ m.111 i I nd ( priei= t.D S Rpt.111.11.bt!!r l c.:t .l iv~""'r.:y year) • l'bol!!!I ~pproved corrt:JC t.l.on~ to the as ll'i S lilN.n"tt wU l o~ upd.a t~ to ~h~ ~omptlt• r data .ba•e a1!!1!!1,1!!!SBlourn~ nile& prior t-:i ~•n.•r11tii,n t:>! ;:cc!pe~tv to:1.X statesl4'Ma. Tb.•r. i.!3 na :=.hargra fc-r corr.etiecu: irtade ~rior to ,:.!,:,11..a.-eri~e e,t prop~rty tn statsmsnt:s.

PJl(l;QSJlfG C,I 152 Ml:l~MA:J M-mLUU'RIWS 1l,na PltftlU'J TN SD.'l!DIIRffl 3PW MI\IUID
Re-ev4l11.ation fODEi!I i:;u.bnri.tted. t.o t.be Special PrDICJram& Section after p~rty tax et.&tan:snt:e have bND m..iled 'lrill be fr;;,rnirded to the COUflty A1,1d i tQr-.-Con troll~ • s off ice for proc 1n; Bin9. '!'be lwd.i tor C'ontroJ.les:- will 1111!111.k.e the eo:n-C!c-t ion to ths pz::~rty ~ :;tat9lllen t. u B inig one a f tvo 1Mthods; 1) isB1.1e a r-~i59'd prcp-erty tax lflita.tBment I.Jr 2 l iBeoe a .:r:'Elfm:ld c ~ec k . The co.rrac:t ion to t b• ecm:put.9.r. r:LiitA bl!ll.1.n ;an nmnm:ie nt rel 11:t!J will. be roade by th~ Special. P.rogt'4llm: s~t io:n prior tu- Ui.e nlllXt t~ y~.z: ..

Mthod 1:

If 1/2 o~ tha proparty tmcaa w.r• paid on the tirst in~tll.llm.entr tho AU.d.itcr CoDtzalle.r ~ill is•ue a revised proptirty tu stata=ent $bc;-.i~g th~ '.::ilecond. in au 11..JnA:!int. bail llDce reduced by the d.if fer em::-• bet wen t:fte ~Qt~4l ~~•e~1n1ent ~nd tne ~ec:~ corruotiixi ~-~~01K1nt+ TIie vropcr ty o,wncr 111 i 11 ;l cit :.,.ee :} reiduc t icfL .i.c::: th ill ,tc t al <"...SA 1 S.l c1.asea:1!uc.e:ci.t on t..ho revifl:ed t.~ ~tate:ment, ,:.he only ne>ticel!I.Ple d.if fe.rence will be in th• ~•~and inst~ll.mt!nt balan~D due.

Mlt.b.ad 2:
1 f i:. he pfi>iia.i: t . .Y r. au:a& wBCe pa.id in ".: b.11:ir e:nt.i rot. y c1io UIII!!! .r ;u::, t. inet-a.1.1..meTit and ~hn di~fercnco bstve~n the actual ~nK~n~~~ ~mi the .recollllll.8:nded corrected -ul!lal!!l1n!lllllE!nt (!XC'eed.s S 10. DO th,~ J\1.tdit.cr Control .... tll itJIIIUI'! 111 r""lt:Uf'ld ~hec-)l to the p:COpi!!rty owner. This :Ql,lil,l' t.ak• &nywil•~- [~~ J t.Q ~ ~th~ tQ oi:eu~. m&c.b. z-..,.i..-.d :P-E'OIP•ftr ~ •-t-~a.~ ea~ N f ~ ebeek PRK:&•11 N by t•• h4itcn- &:r.nt.rc,l l•r wi lJ. coat $1:5. 00 w.b..iah -.rill be ~ to tM CD%r811paad.iD.1J CSA 1 !2 fmsd D1Dlilar.
948
'I" 11 • _ -•1 • -r L .- 1 • I 1,. .J Ir- -l_i ,.•_I I • l'tl I L • _ •• I S~mple~
i
i

2. 1 7 Acre ~a r-cel

UNDEVELDPED
(NOT ASSESSED)
• E'ASJC UNIT
1 ciAU
douse {BAS~C UNIT 11G acre) - 1 BAU
:
-
1 /6 ACRE ;::: .1 7
ACRE
1 BAU X BAU RATE= S ASSESSMENT
949
" . •1,t 1 • ,1 • ,1 .•.III . . . i_ .- 1 ""I '4 . J I I I ; • -1 I • • • :i..:........:.. .r_. • • U:":"'

COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL
' - ■
.. _ -
SA~JJPLC:

UNDEVELOPED
10 ACnES
(NOT. ASSESSED}
. '
DEVELOPED . . .
12 BAU / ACRE X 5 ACRES DEVELOPED ~ 60 BAUr S
so BAU X BAU RATE ~ $ ASSESS~iENT
I .. - I
, ■
...
950

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Douglas Schulze, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Nate Smith, Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer Art Vela, Director of Public Works
MEETING DATE: September 24, 2024
SUBJECT: City of Banning Reinstatement i n County Service Area ("CSA") 152 - National Pollution Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") Stormwater Assessment
RECOMMENDATION:

Discuss with and obtain City Council direction on reinstating the CSA 152 NPDES stormwater assessment originally approved in 1994.

BACKGROUND:

The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) is a federally mandated program to control non-point sources of runoff pollution. The NPDES program is part of the Clean Water Act enacted by Congress in 1987. The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin, Region No. 7, in implementing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s storm water National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program, requires that the Districts and Incorporated Cities within the Whitewater River Basin obtain a joint permit to discharge storm water into the various storm channels and washes throughout the Whitewater River Watershed area. The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) and Riverside County are acting as the Lead Agency with the City of Banning being a co-permittee, along with the various other agencies and municipalities located within the Whitewater River Basin. This current Permit was adopted by the Regional Board on June 20, 2013, expired on June 19, 2018 and has been negotiated and worked on with the affected parties over the past six years. A new permit (2025 NPDES Permit) that has been negotiated with the Regional Board is in review. It is anticipated to be adopted by the end of FY 2024/25 and will take effect 90 days later.

The City of Banning is required, through Best Management Practices (BMPs), to implement practices within our community which reduce pollutants entering into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The major components of the existing and 2025 NPDES Permit to implement the BMPs include: project management, attendance at Desert Task Force meetings, record keeping and Annual Report preparation; illegal dumping and illicit connection detection, inspection, spill prevention and cleanup activities; commercial and industrial facilities inspections (about 60 per year) and the review of all City issued business licenses for SB 205 compliance; implementing land development and plan review procedures including plan check, preparing Conditions of Approval, reviewing erosion control plans and WQMPs and ensuring post construction self-inspections are performed annually by required businesses; enforcing and implementing construction activities requirements of City and private development projects including construction site inspections, review of developer’s BMPs, erosion control plans and SWPPPs (Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans), and ensuring compliance with the Regional Board’s Construction General Permit requirements; maintaining City facilities, including the City 9511
Corporate and Water Yards and Fire Station, and storm drains and performing inspections and maintenance, removing trash and debris from the storm drain system, and from roads through street sweeping; and implementing public education and outreach programs by providing brochures to the public at City events and at the public counter, to businesses and contractors through inspections and storm water training of municipal staff.

The main new requirements of the 2025 NPDES Permit are:
• Asset Management
• Fiscal Cost Analysis/Cost Reporting
• Urban Pesticides
• Trash Amendment/Trash Capture Device Installation
• New Construction General Permit
• Continued SB 205 Compliance, business license verification of SIC Codes The NPDES program costs the City about $300,000 annually to manage the current NPDES Permit.

The new 2025 NPDES Permit will cost more due to its new requirements. One way to generate revenue for the program would be to reinstate a “grandfathered” assessment from 1994, called the CSA 152 NPDES assessment. This stormwater assessment is currently collected by the County on behalf of a number of participating cities via property tax bills. The County administers and manages the CSA 152 program funds pursuant to CSA 152 Administrative Services Agreements with the participating cities.

The County last collected the assessment in the City in 1994 at a rate of $4.72/BAU/year. A BAU is a “benefit assessment unit” as defined by the County. If the assessment is resumed, an owner of a singlefamily home in the City would pay 1 BAU/year, amounting to $4.72/year. Since the rate was adopted in 1994 prior to the passage of Proposition 218, any increase in the rate would require a Proposition 218 Hearing and vote through an assessment balloting proceeding.

Recent Updates
Engineering Division staff met with the Riverside County Economic Development Office and the City Attorney’s Office several times over the past year to gather information and determine if the City or County had ever withdrawn from the CSA 152 Administrative Services Agreement with the County. After researching this, it appears neither the City nor County ever withdrew from the CSA 152 Agreement and, if the City Council would be inclined to do so, the City could have the County resume collecting the assessment starting in FY 25/26. In essence, the stormwater assessment is “grandfathered in” as an allowable assessment prior to Proposition 218 so long as the rate is not increased.

Additionally, there appears to be a reserve of about $46,000 collected by the County from 1994 that was not utilized for City stormwater expenses and thus is due to be reimbursed to the City, for qualified stormwater expenses. These funds could be used to pay a portion of the CSA 152 Assessment consultant or for other stormwater expenses.

Background on CSA 152 NPDES Assessment
LAFCO annexed the City of Banning into County Service Area 152 when the County of Riverside adopted Resolution No. 93-454 (Attachment 2) on December 21, 1993, at the City’s request, in order to have the County place an assessment on property owner’s tax bills to fund expenditures required by the NPDES Permit. On March 22, 1994, City Council Resolution No. 1994-028 (Attachment 3) was adopted to fund the City’s NPDES program, whereby the annual assessment rate for FY 94/95 for CSA 152 was set at $4.72 per Benefit Assessment Unit.

On September 27, 1994 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1994-107, approving the Administrative Services Agreement for the CSA 152 Program between the City of Banning and Riverside County, shown as Attachment 4. The County had formed CSA 152 to finance portions of its programs and obligations associated with its Municipal NPDES Permit. The Agreement sets forth the responsibilities of 9522
the County and City with respect to the assessment. It provides for the City to annually approve a budget and report its activities in connection with its NPDES costs to the City. In addition, the City is responsible for updating parcel information for properties in the City. The County incorporates the City’s budget and the budgets of other participating cities into the County’s CSA 152 budget, holds an annual hearing, approves the assessments, and submits the assessments for collection on the Tax Roll. Both County and City Engineering Division staff performed research, and no records were found showing either party has ever withdrawn from this Agreement. Numerous other cities also joined CSA 152 to ensure funding of their NPDES program.

On July 11, 1995, by approving Resolution No. 1995-125 (Attachment 5), the City Council elected to use reserves (Option C) from the previous FY 94/95 instead of requiring that the property owners be assessed in FY 95/96. Therefore, the annual assessment was $0.00 per BAU for FY 95/96. It should be noted there was a surplus that first year because the NPDES program was just starting. Further research shows that no annual staff reports or resolutions were approved by City Council to allow for collection of the annual assessment in subsequent years.

Calculation of the CSA 152 Assessment
In late 1993, the County of Riverside annexed the City of Banning into its County Service Area 152. The City, acting through the County and CSA 152, is able to collect an assessment on individual parcels within the City that contain a structure. Each parcel is assigned a certain number of "benefit assessment units" or "BAUs." For instance, a single-family home, regardless of its size, is assigned one BAU, while commercial property is assigned 12 BAUs per acre. One BAU costs the property owner $4.72/year.

Vacant and undeveloped land is exempt, regardless of its land use code.

When CSA 152 was formed, the County determined the formula and methodology to use to calculate the number of BAUs for each type of property. The details and examples of calculations for various land uses are shown on Resolution No. 1994-028 (Attachment 3), starting on page 4 of 12, which is County Ordinance No. 573. A parcel’s land use was used to determine its runoff coefficient and BAU/acre (listed in the table), and the developed (assumed to be impervious) area in acres of the parcel is used to determine the number of BAUs and thus cost per year. If the CSA 152 stormwater assessment is proposed to resume, a municipal assessment consultant will be hired by the City to calculate the BAUs for each parcel to be placed on the Tax Roll.

As an example calculation, a Commercial/Industrial property (see below table, Group A, with 12 BAUs/Acre) that is a 10.0 acre commercial/industrial parcel, with a developed area of 8.0 acres, with a City of Banning BAU rate of $4.72 per year:

No. of BAUs = (Developed Parcel Area) X 12 BAUs/Acre = 8 X 12 = 96 BAUs Therefore, the assessment would be: 96 BAUs X $4.72/BAU = $453.12 per year.

The Table below shows the six (6) categories of land use, their respective runoff factors and the BAU per acre. Note that a single-family residence was used as the basis for one BAU. It is the proportionate runoff from a 1/6 acre or .17 acre property for one BAU and other sized parcels and land uses will have multiples of this basic unit.

BENEFIT ASSUSSMENT
UNIT
(BAU's)
Group Land Use Coefficient Factor BAUs Per Acre
A Commercial
Industrial

0.8 12
9533
B
Apartments/Mobile
Homes,
Churches, Schools

0.6 9
C
Single Family
Residential*

0.4 6*
D
Poultry, Irrigated or
Cultivated
Crops, Vacant or
Undeveloped
0 0
E Golf Courses
Private Parks

0.0067 0.1
F
Parcels with
Miscellaneous
Structures

0.0033 0.05
*For simplicity, all single
family residential
properties, regardless of
size, have been assigned
1 BAU.

Schedule of Requirements to Reenact CSA 152
If the City Council would like to pursue reinstating the CSA 152 assessment, a public participation and community outreach phase would occur in October and November of 2024. The Public Information Officer would perform outreach and let the residents and property owners know of public meetings held with the Public Works Dept. to explain the CSA 152 assessment and its purpose with regards to providing funds for the NPDES Program. A Request for Proposals (RFP) would simultaneously be released during this time to hire a municipal special district financing consultant firm. This RFP would provide for preparing the required Assessment/Levy Report to determine the number of benefit assessment units (BAUs) for each property within the City, identify which parcels within the City are eligible to be assessed and prepare any required assessment documents. The City would need to provide the County with the list of Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) to place on the FY 25/26 Tax Roll by mid May of 2025.

Cities must provide any updates/additional parcels from new development annually to the County. The same consultant used to identify the appropriate parcels for the fiscal year 2025/2026 levy could manage this process for the City.

The CSA 152 Agreement with the County of Riverside is being updated by the County and will be released in late 2024. No significant changes are expected; their Administration Fee for managing the assessment funds for the cities will remain at 6% of the revenues collected. If the Council decides to proceed with resuming the CSA 152 assessment, it is anticipated that in January of 2025, this new CSA 152 Agreement will be executed by the City of Banning and the Assessment Services professional services contract will need to be awarded by the City Council in December of 2024. Following this schedule will ensure the CSA 152 assessment can be collected on the FY 2025/2026 Tax Roll.

JUSTIFICATION:

The upcoming 2025 NPDES Permit will become effective in late 2025 and it has new and enhanced requirements that will significantly impact the City financially, as additional computer software, trash capture devices, consultant costs and City staff time will be needed.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No direct impacts from this workshop item, but potential impacts are discussed below. 9544
CSA 152 provides a funding mechanism for the NPDES program. Eleven cities, including Palm Springs, Rancho Mirage, and Desert Hot Springs also joined CSA 152 to ensure funding of their NPDES program.

The County adopted Resolution No. 2024-117 on July 9, 2024, adopting charges for the County Service Areas, including CSA 152, for FY 24/25, shown as Attachment 6.

Since assessments have not been collected from properties in the City since 1994, the funding source for the NPDES program is now absorbed by City of Banning Public Works Department, Streets Division (Fund 100). The Streets Division assists with the implementation and Engineering Division staff manages the NPDES program in-house. Consultants are utilized for Water Quality Management Plan and Erosion Control Plan review (the developer pays these fees through plan check deposits) and for NPDES stormwater and industrial waste inspections. The NPDES program costs the City about $300,000 annually to manage the current NPDES Permit. Those costs are expected to be much higher (likely 35%) with the new permit given the new mandates. The municipal special district financing consultant will determine the estimated revenue to be collected from the assessment, a rough estimate of the revenues is between $75,000 and $110,000/year, which would substantially help with the NPDES program costs.

Stormwater program responsibilities are completed by about ten (10) Public Works Dept. staff members on a part-time and as-needed basis; there are no full-time staff assigned to the program.

ALTERNATIVES:

This workshop is providing information to the City Council and staff is seeking direction on whether to move forward with the next steps to reinstate the stormwater assessment for FY 25/26.

BUDGETED?:

No
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT:

No
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Attach 1 CSA 152 Assessment PowerPoint.pdf

2. Attach. 2 County Reso. No. 93-454, formation of CSA 152, 12.21.93.pdf

3. Attach. 3 CC Reso. No. 1994-028, approving initial CSA 152 rates, 3.22.94.pdf

4. Attach. 4, CC Reso. No. 1994-107, approving CSA 152 Agree..pdf

5. Attach. 5, CC Reso. No. 1995-125, asking Council to approve or cease CSA 152, 7.11.95.pdf

6. Attach. 6 County Reso. 2024-117, CSA adoption FY 2425, 7.9.24.pdf 9555
CSA 152 NPDES
Stormwater Assessment

1. Discuss and Obtain City Council Direction

2. Background of CSA 152

3. Calculation of Assessment

4. New 2025 Permit Requirements

5. Schedule/Next Steps

6. Questions
1 9566
•
A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) Permit regulates point and
nonpoint source discharges of pollutants into
Waters of theUnited States
• The FederalCleanWaterAct prohibits discharges of
pollutants from point and nonpoint sources unless
regulated by an NPDES Permit
• A joint NPDES Permit to discharge storm water into
the various storm channels and washes throughout
the Whitewater River Watershed area was issued by
the Colorado River Basin Regional Board No. 7
2 What is a NPDES
Permit
9577
Whitewater River
Region
• Two Principal Permittees – RCFC&WCD and
Riverside County
• Eleven Co-Permittees –Ten cities and the
Coachella Valley Water District
• Designated as a Phase I MS4 in 1991 • Under the fourth term permit since 2013 3 9588
Background of CSA 152
• On December 21, 1993, the County of Riverside adopted County Resolution No. 93-454, annexing the City of Banning to its County Service Area (CSA) 152 to fund a portion of its expenditures associated with the NPDES Permit by placing an assessment on property owners' tax bills. • On March 22,1994 the City Council approved Resolution No. 1994-028, setting the annual assessment rate for FY 1994/95 at $4.72 per Benefit Assessment Unit (BAU) and following the formula and methodology of County Ordinance No. 573 to determine the number of BAUs for each type of property • The City Council then approved the Administrative Services Agreement with the County for the CSA 152 Program on September 27, 1994, via Resolution No. 1994-107 • The following year, on July 11, 1995, the City Council approved Resolution No. 1995-125 and elected not to participate in CSA 152 and instead used the reserve funds from the previous FY to fund the NPDES Permit for FY 1995/96
4 9599
Background of CSA 152
5 • From both City and County research, no records have been found showing that either party has ever withdrawn from the Agreement and therefore the City can reinstate the CSA 152 Assessment for the upcoming FY 25/26 if City Council is inclined to do so
• Since the rate was adopted in 1994 prior to the passage of Proposition 218, any increase in the rate would require a Proposition 218 Hearing and vote through an assessment
balloting proceeding
96010
Calculation of Benefit
Assessment Unit (BAU)
6 • When CSA 152 was formed, the County determined the formula and methodology to use to calculate the number of BAUs for each type of property based on land use • Each parcel that contains a structure is assigned a number of Benefit Assessment Units (BAUs). Vacant and undeveloped land is exempt
• A single family home is charged 1 BAU, regardless of its size, amounting to a charge of $4.72/home/year • The City has an estimated 10,700 residential and 650 commercial accounts • A parcel’s land use was used to determine its runoff coefficient and BAU/acre (listed in the table on the next slide), and the developed (assumed to be impervious) area in acres of the parcel is used to determine the number of BAUs and thus cost to the property owner per year • If the CSA 152 stormwater assessment is proposed to resume, a municipal assessment consultant will be hired by the City to calculate the BAUs for each parcel to be placed on the Tax Roll 96111
Calculation of Benefit
Assessment Unit (BAU)
7 • As an example calculation, a Commercial/Industrial property (see below table, Group A, with 12 BAUs/Acre) that is a 10.0 acre commercial/industrial parcel, with a developed area of 8.0 acres, with a City of Banning BAU rate of $4.72 per year:
• No. of BAUs = (Developed ParcelArea) X 12 BAUs/Acre = 8 X 12 = 96 BAUs • Therefore, the assessment would be: 96 BAUs X $4.72/BAU = $453.12 per year. 96212
Other Participating Cities and
Collected Revenues
8 • Below is a list of revenue collected by some cities within CSA 152 for Tax Year 2024. Desert Hot Springs charges $10.00/BAU with 9,477 parcels and Rancho Mirage $4.68/BAU and 13,814 parcels 96313
Benefits of Reinstating the CSA
152 Annual Assessment
9 • CSA 152 provides a funding mechanism for the NPDES program. Eleven cities joined CSA 152 to ensure revenue is collected to fund a portion of their NPDES Program • Since assessments have not been collected from properties in the City since 1994, the funding source for the NPDES program is now absorbed by City of Banning Streets Department (Fund 100). • The NPDES program costs the City about $300,000 annually to manage the current NPDES Permit.

Those costs are expected to be much higher with the new permit given the new requirements and will keep rising over time
• The municipal special district financing consultant will determine the estimated revenue to be collected from the assessment, and a rough estimate would be between $75,000 and $110,000/year, which would substantially help with the NPDES program costs 96414
New Provisions in the 2025
NPDES Permit
10 The following new provisions will be incorporated into the 2025 NPDES Permit:

1. Asset Management

2. Fiscal Cost Analysis/ Cost Reporting

3. Urban Pesticides

4. Trash Amendment/Management

5. New Construction General Permit

6. Continued SB 205 Compliance re: Business Licenses
The WWR Stormwater Management Plan is the implementation document and it will be updated to incorporate these provisions and continuing provisions within 12 months of the effective date of the Permit. 96515
• Permittees will develop an Asset Management Program:
• Asset Inventory
• Asset Management Plan
Asset Management
96616
12 Due twelve months following the effective date of the Permit Maintain a database consisting of:
• Municipal Facilities
• Municipal Storm Sewer Infrastructure (storm drains, basins, inlets, channels, outfalls) • Full Capture Systems (FCS), trash capture devices
The Asset Inventory will require the following information:
• Name or ID of the facility
• Address or Coordinates
• Inspection frequency based on prioritization
• Last inspection date
• For trash control devices, whether the device is a certified FCS Asset Inventory
96717
Complete 24 months following the effective date of the Permit The Asset Management Plan shall contain the following:
• SOPs for routine maintenance of MS4 facilities, including visual monitoring, removal of trash and debris, reducing the discharge of contaminants during routine cleanouts, and proper disposal of waste
• MS4 facility prioritization – establish the frequency at which each facility/asset is maintained and establish procedures for reprioritization
• How to identify facilities/assets that require maintenance/repair • Establish a schedule when facilities are expected to be rehabilitated/replaced or when new facilities are established 13 Asset Management Plan
96818
• Under the 2013 Permit, Permittees were not required to report on the costs of stormwater program implementation • Under the 2024 Permit, Permittees will be required to report total stormwater program budgets for the preceding,
current, and future fiscal years, and a description of the sources of funding
• Contingencies for asset failure or repair
• If the SWRCB adopts a new Order for Cost Reporting,
extensive tracking of NPDES Permit costs including staff time, equipment and materials, amounting to about 100
categories, would be required
• Monthly reporting on storm water costs including street sweeping and storm drain cleaning and corresponding debris removed from the street, storm drains and catch basins
would have to be measured
14 ~100
cost
categories
Fiscal Cost Analysis
96919
• Each Permittee will develop and
implement policies, procedures, and
ordinances to reduce the use of pesticides
and fertilizers
• Each Permittee will develop an Integrated
Pest Management (IPM) Plan within 18
months of the effective date of the
Permit.
15 Urban Pesticides
97020
Preventative Measures
• Only use pesticides/fertilizers when needed
• Use least-toxic alternatives
• Prohibit banned/unregistered products
Proper Application
• Do not use during rain, and establish a routine application schedule Proper Storage and Disposal
• Store indoors within secondary containment
• List procedures to dispose of pesticides
• Keep manifests as a “chain of custody”
Applicator Management
• Ensure Permittee staff are trained to apply pesticides • Pesticides application must be overseen by a certified pesticide applicator • Contractors must implement Permittee’s IPM at municipal facilities/operations Education and Outreach
16 Integrated Pest Management Plan
97121
Trash larger than a diameter of 5 mm must be captured and removed from Priority Land Uses (PLUs) or designated land uses include:
• High Density Residential
• Industrial
• Commercial
• Mixed Urban
• Public Transportation Stations
Interim Compliance Deadline: 50% trash capture devices installed in about 40 City catch basins by 2028
Requires full trash capture from PLUs by December 2, 2030 Annual Reporting
• Update Jurisdictional Map to show installed devices
• Total area, debris removed & percentage area served by device Trash Amendment/Management
97222
• New Permit became effective September 1, 2023
• The WDID number must be posted at the site
• Public construction projects now require QSD
and QSP involvement
• WQMPs and post construction maintenance plans
to be uploaded to SMARTS, allowing for public viewing
• Reissuance Training for QSDs and QSP.

New Construction General
Permit
97323
19 Effective January 1, 2020
Codified under California Business and Professions Code, Section 16000.3 and California Water Code 13383.10
Requires Cities and Counties that have a business license program to:
• Update business license permit applications to provide SIC codes and WDIDs, NEC identification numbers, or NONA numbers
• Identify whether the business license applicant’s provided SIC codes require IGP coverage (see IGP Attachment A)
• Enforce SB 205 provisions, which may include withholding/suspending business licenses for facilities that require IGP coverage and do not have a WDID Senate Bill 205
97424
• The IGP, adopted in 2014, and amended in 2015 and 2018, regulates industrial stormwater discharges and non-stormwater discharges from industrial facilities • Industrial sites can contribute pollutants such as Nutrients (Nitrate, Nitrite,Ammonia) and Heavy Metals (Copper, Lead, Zinc) to receiving waters
• AttachmentA of the IGP identifies 9 categories of facilities requiring coverage under the IGP.

Those businesses are identified by their SIC Codes
20 Industrial General Permit (IGP)
97525
21 September 24, 2024
CSA 152 Workshop
Discuss the
reinstatement of
CSA 152 and obtain
City Council
direction
Public Outreach in
October and
November, 2024
Provide outreach to
residents with PIO’s
assistance and hold
meetings to explain
CSA 152 and its
purpose
September -
November, 2024
Release RFP for
Assessment
Services, solicit and
select a consultant
December 12, 2024
Provide feedback on
community outreach
and award
Assessment Services
Contract to a
consultant
January, 2025
City Council
approves the new
CSA 152 Agreement
with the County
Proposed Schedule and Next Steps
April, 2025
Consultant completes the
final Assessment/ Levy
Report for Engineering staff
to review
March, 2025
City Council approves the
BAU levy and the City’s CSA
152 budget for FY 25/26
and submits the Resolution
to the County
May, 2025
Engineering staff submits
the Assessment/Levy
Report for the FY 25/26 Tax
Roll to the County
June –August, 2025
The County prepares their
staff report and budget and
submits the FY 25/26 CSA
152 assessments to the
County Assessor’s Office
97626
Questions?
Contact Information
Nate Smith, P.E. Deputy Director of
Public Works/ City Engineer
[email protected]
97727
97828
97929
98030
RE.80LUT10B OF THE CITY COONCIL 07 ~HE CITY 07 BANWIBG
BBTT:IlfQ B..I..TEA POll. iC:OUJfT'i 8 ERVI:C B Alt n 1 !ii :2 • TO l"UMD CITY~s NATlQl(AL POLLUTAN1' DISCHARGE ELIMIBJ,.TIOK BYSTEII (lfPDl:8> PROOUX
WHER.EM 1 th~ coun~y of Riv~rside, by it~ Re~olution No. 9]-4~4 adopted December Z l r 151 '9 J I a:n11e'.li.'.1Bd the City of Ela nn iri,g to its county service Ar~a (CSA) 152 8t the City'a r~qoest to meet the Environme~t~l PrD~ectian Agency 1 s requirement to obtain opQrating perm.its for discharges .fram storm drain. ,e;;ye-tems and to pay tor anticipat~d p~oje~~ costs that place~ an a~5ess=ent on prop~rty own~rs' t~x bills ~o fund expenditures required by tho permit, and WBBR:D.B 1 City ~t~ff has estimat~d th~ storrowater management pl"'cgra11:1 .l"'@:qui:r-~111.@ints will cost the City approx il"Clately $53 t 60-0 annually; and
WHD!U , a II Be:n e.t it Ass ess:me-n t Unit 11 i :s defined in. the River a i cle Co\lnty F 1 ood Control and w a te:r c-ons-erv at 1 on Di :s:t.r i ct Ma~ua1 1 ~he por~ion of ~hich defining Benefit ~sse~~nent ~nit is attach~d as ~li.hibit l an.d by this refeTence ~~de a part hereof; and WBER.D.B, this City council has determin.ect, based on ~taff's calculations, that &nnual ~ssessments are anticipated to be $4T7~ per Benefit Asssssment Unit.

Mo•1 THERBFORB BE IT RESOLVEC by the City Cou~cil of the City Qf Banning th~t the annual ass~ssment rate for fisoal year l994-9S for CSA l52 - Banning i~ hereby set ~t $4T72 per Benerit Ass~ss~~~t Unit.

PA.8 S.J::C I APDOVED, AN:O ADOP'l"!D
th:.~ -~itlj d"J of KDr:,t.
~~~~1-L=---
r lifornia
98131
~TTEST:
"&~ - .~._J)~~½~
L~cille M. Eli~ondo '
City Clerk of the City Of
Banning. California
APPROVED AS TO FO.RN!
.AND L CONTENT
Joh/ . Wil~on, Esq.
city 11.ttorney

CERTIFICATION
I.. L~c:il le M. Elizondo, C:i ty Clerk ot tha City of Banning t Califo~nia, do hereby certify that the for~going Re~olution No. 1994-28. w-as duly ~d.opted by the City counc:i 1 of the city of aanning, California, ~ta Reg~lar Meeting the~eof held on the 22th day of March, 1994, by the following vote, to wit;
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Counc~Tmambe~~ AnQ~rson, Lewis~ Wi1li~~s~ Mayfrr Reyno1ds Co :m c: i T rnernbe r- Sm1 th Non"='
None
-2-
~ _J;~ 1-"'k..& /4uclfu M. Eli~ondo
• City Cle-rk. 1 City ot Banning
California
98232
1 • • • • I • • J . J1 I" 11 • I • I • •• "." li'-"I' ." I Q:llP1NIIGI ~o. ~71, alJ"J'IDBiiJ ?OR cs.a.~
"!'he purpa EH! t, i t. hi !.l: i:..::irdi nane• is to ~i III t.ati 1.i ~ h .::i. '!,:Ix ~"!Jaure r. Dr "t ne I evy ,1nd collection ~t cn~r-g@a tor e~tenaeci gOV€1rll.mentai ~ervic~ p~ovidcd in : ~• ~ 11 n t. y ! 1-,'!ZV i..,c: e areas . undl!! r t hj! au 1: r.o.r it y o.t t: he County s el.."'V"ice I..r,e.a wv ~s 3et !or~~ in Gove~n!ll8nt ~ooe 5ecti0n l~J10+l et. seq. T~ chargee e~tablisbed hP.~under Hhall be l~v;~d ta p~y in wnoJ~ er part. the coBt ~f ~.1:i:-V'iding- a;uct c.ct.eqded. gi:iv.rnm&trt~l i;i:.::.cv ie-it~.

B_~H'U l'l" M:P:!H HN52T UHl~ .. (DAV) D!CrnPPWIP AllD NK'l'!lopm.oor •~·he .i;:i o, i!!' l!l :sJ11an t c: cm.pu.tation Ii:lli;!!'t.,h.Qd.olo~ 'i cidopted. f :;::t" ":.:!:l,i a CS.A i• t ha BALI :.i..t h.O<i .J.-ve l tlpea by ~l.! ve~~ id• ..;ou.n.t y F 1 uud C-on. 't. r cl n lr; t. t:-ict r Thi~ IC.E!lt~oo spr~ads th~ total asees~t to pan:::e1s witQin tho bmt@~~t ,i,l,:i,.1111 ~!!'JI !!il:m.en.,:. ..u-e-a in propo.IT..i,.on to eaii:h p;;&-" ~•d ' ~ rune f f • RQ.11.Q ff iEli Lill!:tormi.1110:d by tir:et .lcnowinq a. pare~l • s ::Ji:e in -1::11ereg it.s .pre:i;unt lia.nd ;,,ia e ( blC ident i al - Cc.,ai11111~l (.:! i ;1 l ~ l nd.u :!lt:r i:a.1 1 c..::tc- + J "'n.d t~-&n aas-i~Riag a runoff fM,1;t,;;1,- t. u i t..m. g ll:~ra.i l :iind U•• c • t,i;;iqq ry ~ Rt1noi f f &c-tora ara ~~ti.ma.tea of h~ mu.~h ~alnfnll ~Mn~ ~ff~ pa..rcEi ln ~map~riaon to ~he ,:),-=:i;:iur.t of t:a.1.nfall that .±a.11 on a pa.rc:&l. ln other -..rord., tho :r:-unci:ff f .1eti::i-r i.1. ~ lili'ay of -P.xpre !!'JI~ inq th• t:e l Iii ii.. .i vt~ Ll~ ree of .i.uiyy,:, Y loiu enc & s o:f pl! rc-1! 1:s with dif rerc-nt l:1.nd UH-ii r Pav~ aM i.mprO"t.Nii!d pa.re-el• h.av. r~~off factors closer to 1~0 (wha~~ l~O qquala 100, runc±f) than d~ u n p.!!ved or unimproved parce.l;!!!' . R.mic ing the la.rge ntl:ftlbitr of l and n 5-e'!I in l l,11'.1 C-a uQty to :s iJ:; gi,r..e.ral G"at.er;JQri "" f a-r:: e Elitima:tin.g nanoff under th:e 1-,nefit aaBeae.ant pn;icl!du~ pxO"l"'id~• ford Il'lllna~ai5ble Gild rtH11aonable cga:;ip~t~LiQQ :in,sthoor
r\,~ ~he National Pollut..tJ,..nt Dlsehtu;q~ Klimination Sy~te~ !NPDES} P~QlgL.f:llil ~ddition~l t~~o~ hav~ h@~n br::0nght in to ~he a.n.aiyai5 wnich cona.ider ,:.;. hit, t. ype o:f a.ct i v.i ty oc. t h.&t .laud u•~ . 'fhi s ti,.roqrillR ,i,. ;c11quirlltd by .Fic-d.eral Riegull!I t; i1:m t c- f C>C"ns i t11 attention on urbi!ID.i :t:l!!d i!lrei!I& or d~v~lerpmeirtto a:n:d. to ~~eluck! ~~ic~ltu~Al propertiea. T~e;t"f;!!fQ6e &g:s; i cul tu.ca 1 .inid. ,,, .w.on t. und~Vflllr:-pt!lld. proi:iertie:e hl!IVC: been cc.,mpl a.tit! l:, -:-:: :.e.Dp-t ed f ;r;Qm a e: 1J@1l!!u!lments @'lr'E!! r:: ~hou,gh t: hey obv i O'll.l!lil y ;nay ll,l!!lvr;!I sUDl!!II !lll'lount of cupcff_
Tha CC>.m£lutation ◊f th~ aa•••aat11~~ f~r a.ny parc6l i~ b~od on the nu:aibe~ e,f BAIJ18: .a. ■ 1i:iqn ad. to that pan:-el. A .sic.(] le-f ami.l y re:aidant i.ll.l :pari=:cl. of 7,ioo ~qua.rB re&t (1/6 acre) in si~e Yith a runoff f~cto~ ot ~.40 vaa s~le~tlll!PQ. ~~ tha starui.ar~ BAU. Th• naJU:1111tr uf BAUe for a~y oth.ec parcel ca11 hft ....--:ampll teci by :r.e lat. i.ngi it 11, s.i..%:11- ..!IL.mi 1.l!lind: u 51,e 'CD tha .BAU as of;lg i.c: r .1 bed under the headin,g ~ C"a!IIJ!lnta.t: ion of TJni ts I:~ E:ill.C'h [' ill'Clllll'" ~ Aljla.i.11, t..11.11- p~i;i:n;:iipl• i.a.volvwd. L• :i-r,l~ti:aq 1111 t.oaii ruag:f f to t.M- aPQ11at. of .i.ape~i.ou:1111 ~• p~••11t. ( aic:t.~l 4...,...,1,oped aoniiA?) a J.
98333
I, • I" i.u • I_I . • II I . I . : ..:....,._. ..... _._.

The ~....bl~ Lo~ow Gr.owD ~he~,;...~ ~~~8~Qcico ~c l~ng u~c~ G.:lQ~~ ~~~~c~iv~ =unoff =actor~ at'lri the ~AU pex uc.u-.

IIJIRti il!a.llSm8~ WITS
,~------------~-----~-----~-~------~---
1 GROUP 1 t J\N n 1,~'R FAC'?OniPER AeJ{E
I A 1 Camme:cci.al .. _ Irtdu.etr:la l
~ ~part.!aent5/Mobi~e Hean!!! Far~~~Chnrch~g,Sebaolc
I
~ Sinqle-f.u\..ilv P~~identul
0 Pault.r-vrirrigated/Cultivatied. ~toD~,
Li'7EIBtock~Vacant UnQ.CV•loped
I!: Golf ~aU:t"!!Je.-S • 1•:ri v~te Pl!llr kB
f" Pa.rec.la- with Mi.ll!Pc ~ i.l an,oou.a .S t.r';.lctl.1rl!!!':is UlVLEI
CIOUP ~ - CQIIKIKC:IAL /IKDU:11:t'lll:IJU.
"i.and Utle i:.:ooeEi: C 1 - Comm.ere ia1 1Jr-opert:i.lills

0.:80
r,_ ~o
! o~ 40
0-rOU
o~oo,n
0,003.:)
CL - Commercial Hui~d..i.:nqs on ieaEietl 1.a...c.a.

GROUP 8 - A,f'U.1!111:r.--t"-8 1111 /dla.1L& !IOMIJ .PA:aPi., C:IIURCEE8 • SCIIOQL5 I.~nd u ~e cadlll • : CA - A.[)l!!,rt 1IU:tnt Bu.i ldl ng:, \ 4 fJr mo;i;- s: un..i I. s l Cl - Chu. .. ~h...-111;
HP - llnbi.le Elcme Rental .E"u-k , 3 nr mare J.:n.i t~ ~ Rl - Ap,e,rtiNn~ suildinga t4 o~ :ir:,o~~ unit~!
SC - S~haola
0-ltDlJll' C ~ S llfGLZ-rAittL'I ftES"IDD'I' [Ali
Land UAe cod.ea : Alt - Aqr i-cu.l tu.r~l Ree idant.i,1],J. 0 .. 10
0 .. 05
CR - Sin~l-e-Pa.mily Rc~idcnti~l ~, or ie•• unit~)
Mr I.ndivid.ualiy owned p&-re~l with n.obile hamc::i
.HO - Indivi~ually r;,,m,.d p~~P-1 ~ith :r=io:bil~ ~a.

MP - Nobila Hone on lsa6Rd. 1~.:t.

PR - R..aeidantul on a~ricult~ra.1. pr~~e.rv~
Rl - Sin~ie-~a.m.i1y R~sid•ntial
R2 - RaB~dential t2 or 3 un~~c~
~c ~ CQndomJ.n.i.um.a w~eh priv4la ~nL.c:y
RD - Cond.csi.nLums with common ant.r:i. 9
RI - SingJ.e-,t-"mn.i.1 y .Ne !Ii ~:nt: i a 1
rut - :nd.i vi du.al. l y ,ownoo mub.i 1 liill h0att lot. [-rn - S i n9 l II;!'-!'"t\lllil y .t-i:e~~~t: ia 1
RX - Rxc:::eptiDnal ~~~ident~al
GROUP R - GOLP COURU,. PRIVATE PUKB
Liana U~~ ~Qde~~ C5 - CelM!t~~~~~ {B~cludiu~ nQR-p~0fit) GC - Go 1 f -.~-aura~
GR.OUP ,- - PAaCBLS ,r1n xracrnn:ooa s~
Lat1.d. U:!!!f!I Code:!! :: AS - 1lacl!l.nt with .m.i:l!!I ce llan•cn.1:m: !iitrnctar e Y'S - l.4I.1.-c! with ;,d• i;-..-11 aneott u tit :c-u:t=tl.l.:c-c i;-n 1 y i::XAl!rpi e::s :i: old f 0'Llndat i-01111 , p(mp hou:1e :s or :!; hoed iii; 1Tot. .i.o ue-o98434
..• ,. . • •. I ' I •• · .. I •• I • I - •=...:....:.I • .

CQ.HPUT.MI Pl: Qf YIU.S f"Oa .t"'-WU PA..Y'J!:
;:.!i- -i:::rev i.uui.. iy :!Jt.-c."t-ea, t.h¥ .RAU l :II tb.,e, p;cuportiono:t.-e n.:i:nQ;ff :frOJ:L &. ain.gi11tf.!l.l!!Lly 1~£id~nLiai ~~rc•l with~~ «~•a oi l/5 (~.171 ~cce. O~huc aiz~ ~:.a~c~l~ ~rw J~~d us~ c~t~iv& ~ill haY• .multip!~~ 9L ~be b~¥i~ u:-i.it+ Or:e l 1 } Unit -= t O. 1 ·1 A.ere J X ( S 1 ri,;1 Qo-F a.mi ly .M:&llil id 1iii1 n. t.ia l Ru.no! f .t·actor I
OI:"p
For ~~ i :mp l : c-i ty .::i.11 ~ ihig:.::_ t.:: - ! a.au.I y ril!!!'ll!!I ident.i.a.l 1,;il:. i:.;ipt'.! r t".ii:!111 reqB rdl!!!:.SS -of ~i%~ h~vn be&n ~~s~gned l B~U.
'rM numb~r ,.;if. a.ase:r:: :IUN:n.t. unit. B
ta.mi 1 y D!!!1u.ch11 n tial l a.r-g-lil.r tb.a..o
folloving ~quation:
f o.:c All pa.re"'-= l. $
,j. l 7 .l.cr-&Ei I i:a ( c;:,th.e-r t.b4tl; s iCl.c;l.lEI - det.e:rmt:n111Pd by t.n..

N~r o t Uni t.5 - ( A,r, e:~ o1 P&rC@l__ln ~.r•I t x £ R\,LQOf f F-Gc_:t:_or; l ()n fl t~a:1111 .1.c .A s:s:&& &lllE!n 1:. uni. t
~Q-.;;i;p A ;I: (;~r-cial ~ l~uatri al.

Rn.no££ ra~l.Qr - ~.ijO
nAU!ill • ( Area of Pa.:ccial O~"'l¢p,Qd I x 12 DAU/ Aere Orou.p B :i: ~111t-'1 t Nal::il.9 ._, Pa.riu., Cb.urc,.li,e11-, 8Cll:COJ..a kunof t :t:a:ctor - -0. lliQ
JlA.Us • ( A.r"!td of Parce,L Deve iop:i:,,i l X '1 BAU/ A.c:::re O.raup C ~ Sii:Lgi.e-Pa..i ly H-iii!I-Ual
.Runoff FiltC'tDr ~ 0.40
.B.A~e • (.11 Al':l.re•i X ~ BAU/Mte
.POul~.E"]', 1rrigat.d cropa. ::-altivatlliHil ~o~•, aairie•, L.iv•at~ ~!i1Vd.im9 rll'da. V.a.c:am~ und•••loped
iHH:i!".11 t Fa.e"t.or = 0. {10
BAOa = {1.00
G.vu:; IS.: CklJ.f Cou..r8-a ■ , :P:riY•t• Pan:1
RunQff Eactl).r • OrOg67
BAU& = (Are.a. of .r.a:rc:1111 DBVsl u.p,ad l X CJ . IO RAU/ Ac r 1111 i:.1:s,;11,1.p f': Pa.re• ls w.i. t:lb. m.i:acaila:DeOU• •truct111 ~• R~~ciff Fa~t0r • o~~Oll
rum~ • ( Ar~a. of Paree l o~ 2..cp~ l x □ _ O:'!i R.Jl,tl / Aer@ T"
98535
• ._ I-_._ ,1 _. _L,. r • I 1 I 1-.".J •. I 11 1 I I . I .U:... !QlU:1.11 9t' :CXfICJLL ~B.Mlll'S
A.35L,Jtu:::; i\ l ,o • 0 .acre ~-oaatll re i al Ii nd.L.l.~ t: t: i al pa.r"1 el ...-.1th A. d~'WI toped a.t:cu, of ~ . o ~e~e:s wh i.:::h l:a:s: a 8AU rat.• o t. S 4 • O C p,r 'Y'C i::tr:
?-.'o 4 of :BA'Us ... ~ Oev'l!-J.op@d Fa.:r.ii;:1:11 Area) X 1. i .aA "D / .:\crll!' • a X 1~ = ~6 ilAOS
~berefor~, th• ~&ae~sma~t ~Qa1Q li,w!;
ASSUM!:
96 BA.U~ i S4,00/-SAU - $lS~~aO pe+ vea~
Pu-Jes (Qz-Qup ►
A iOa~ acre l'llOhiie home park witn a d~va~oped 4:rca 0£ a.o acros ~bi~b haa a BAU rat~ Qf $4aO0 '.EJ'B.r ye~~
Ho. ~f BAU~= <De~•lcpod. P~t:t.:e1 Are~) X j BAU/Ac;::re z S.O ~, ~ ?2 BAU& T.a,erefore, ~ho •s~sae~r.~ ~~~ld b~~
72 HA.Us~ ,~~/SAU = S2B8.GO Ptlr Yfta~
l ~ RtliOutial { G~p C!,
ASSOMK:= A 10,~ 4Clre ~inqle-fam..ily ~•aidential paTcAl u Vhi..c:h MB 4 MU ratt! of S4~u0 per ~a~~
tio • ci f .BAU-u - C o . 1 ·, iu::r,ii,• , X 6 UAU / Ac r:t':. • 0 . 1 "l ,:: 6- -:: 1 RAU
·i·ti.eret ore.. the as:1.-• ~t 'liicold b•::
1 DAU X S4.0O/BAU ~ S4.0C per year
4, f:W~ltry. Irrigatlfd C~cpt. Cµltiyated Crop•, n•lu••~ :t.iu•ts,c.k. Vacant. Up4ftl:1:1Pnsl ( Group D-)
ASSmnt;: A 1 a • Cl ll!it:re P D1J 1 t.::r;y parc!al wb ic:b ::..iii.A :-.■ rei:!r:iaasndad iY.,U c,. t.o of $4.00 per yeor4
~o , o.f BA.Os = ( .oevel0pea Pa;s;c...,l lU"oa l .x. o ~u / Ac.re ~ lD.O XO - 0 RAU&
?hereforer the aese~~aent would be:
0 UAU X St,00/:6.AU: $0.00 per year
98636
I • I ._ . ,• •J I I . .. I • I I .. - .... I I r1 I I I . ._IL. s ~ col :f :C:PiUf:!l k ;:ariyata i"ar.k.111_ c t;L"Ou.p £) ~ lOrO a~r~ G,:.,lf CQU~~~ or ~rtvate ~ar~ W~th ~ dev~lopeci c1.rei!II CJ ~ u . u .c1:c.;: • I..! a-: ..., i'1: ~ c.b hal!I a .rec-i::amend~d IlAJl .-a t.e a:f ~ 4 . 0 G par y~a.r:;:
~o + ·-..J f BAUi; = ~ Devl!l loP1!"ri ~~ roe l At'ea } x. u L l ll B.n.ll / kra = 840 X 0.10 = 0.80 n.AU~
'L'her.,f r;;i,.411 , t b.e o:1.s s.e:s:smeo t. 111~ld b1t:
oLa~ BAUs X $4.Cg/MU - Sl~20 pee year
A 1a.o a.o~~ p,iicecl witb 8.o MreB of old lV'Und~tiona, or pump h¢1l11•• n.gt ooaupit1d t')r bain~ u•11:id whi&h he.:11 ,1, .-~nde-d. BAU rat~ of S!~nO ~£ year,
Ne • of .BA.Us • { nev•J.opaa. P-a..rot!!!l A.rlNI ) i:: Ct + 0 S IiALF / AQ~e - 8.0 X Or05 ~ -40 BAU~
Tl-.erefore 1 ~he Q~~u~3~cnt -wcald t:J,,e:

O ~ 4 0 BJ\Ua x $ ii • co/ RAU 1111 $- l. t:i O p~:i- yftar Th~ KMBBwument 3ystem. is de•igne-d. to id~ntify ~n.d. ec:apute a.a••-~~ u:n. '"'~PICI.L'" propert .i.Q!I c lo&e ly meeting t. bo:s~ l~d ~ ee d••er iption• . How r tha BJ!lltam i• flexible ~~o~g~ t.o acc~mm.adate ~it~tia~~ w.tu.ch rlo n~~ m&et the a~erage or typical JAlild ~8~ wi~hi..:i the a cateqo.z:ie!jl:, In thas• inatl!!lOC~5 ~z:IC':lnlo.- RULSS-~ have~~ eat&blisn•d to ~rO?"ide .a c::1C:rn;; i &tlB.,l;lt. ~t; hDd lu , 1\1'~ 1:iia t• t hDli!ia pr(lperti 1..u11 .. 1 . RV P&t' ks havinq i~~ s~n.1 l uccu~t i.on 'lifi 11 ~ve- l!I. !i 0% reduct.ion rate. appJind. to tn~ ~alcuJ.ated as,oc*:ruiin~
2 r .E1fen t:t.tough .1g r ie~l t:u.ra l p.!1.rca J :g: r11:r@o 1111D!!impt ~ ;t1.in'S le-ta.ail y rC'Gi1.fou t.la1 un.i t on • .,,n agrt.eul t ur~..L pa.rc!r3l i e: ;;iot examp't ~nci. will b11;11 aeaeBBed at t~o normal ~ingl~-faaily ~eaident~al ~•l~ulation .3 ~ JU::. va.c:an t /undavl!:! loped l .1utd i !!'I ~.xe:mpt: regard,l••• ot t.h.a .land use e¢d.• 4 • All. ai,g~ ic u l .._:i.:i:.1. a.1. pa.:t"tie.1.a. .llQ ~t., packing IEi.n@d:ll O:t' sto:t"agit1 bu.ildi~q_. ti.•fil in c:ot1jUnQt.i.on witli th111 oit"w'ricultural dc::'t:i.v:i.t.y :a.~ ~x,amp,t
S • I :Qdian Fedora.l 1il!nd G .-..n.d Bt.u:·e-atJ a f Land Mana~BIQIIJD-t land~ a.z::111 ozampt., bmiiavei; I~ l.i.nd• l ll;!!l!l•~ t:o non-I .ad.ian azi.ti t.Lu; wi lb. a t.rnc t.iires ar11 not ex-ampt
98737
.-••." I . . " 1 '-1 . I • ,1,._. ,. ". 1 I 1• 1 •.·.· 1··1•"-l_i LL " 0 I • 11-I •• ,,
MLQCJU:UJU rstl -r.?PICAL CM 1~; 81-JY!:Hln' ort
= a~ ~roµi.;: r r.:. y civnl!"!r:,. ~h~ f oe.l 1. hat tha i r par~ol doe-s not .m.~~ ~- t.h~ 'tTJ;il..i.ca 1 si t1;1.a. t ion I a t:iy Bt~ f 0-r iP:v-a.i 11a. tion h~,i; Le-en -ll:as ta.bl i e:hea ~ l f:t i ng t.h• J. ollowlng Sample f'"o;r;:m to t."l!!!'-P.Va lua t:411 -' pr-op.tty CJlr{D'llr I B CSl,i,

15.2 i:J.IJ 15-eB eimen t , City i:. taf :t :1b00.ld t1 [email protected] if tba ~ •h•:am111nt i • i:ncor t c:::i;,; l by ..c•v l.Erwi..ciq afl!lri6l ?,nct-o s or hy field. fa::i.~pec-t..i.cm l.f neeefl:••ryT
'l'h• irtVi!II l 1.1ation f-OPII i.::: ou ld ~ p:r°"igad to th. §J.1 os:rt:1.rcy owner by tM.i.l or inada availahla at tne ~Q~n~ar. 'l'he ~op h-lf Qt tu f~~m (Prope:tty Int~tioPI ean bo complated by ~h• ~ropcrr.y mmer ~ftd! mailed b&c.k to statf o~ ~~fo:r:zatiQn ~an be gatti~red hy ~~aff ove~ the t&lBIJhoo•~ ~h~ Mt'.tt'.lm half ot: th-I! far.11111 i!il: fcir -at•ff use to Tec:or,;f tht: infDaJ6t.ion a.bout t.h.e propi,r:t:y gAth,a:reri du.ring th-1!11 eva.l -u:,1 t ior. whi~ ia n8G!e:s~ tQ d-eterm:i ne j f "' c or roic-c &d aaBBBl!llaiietn.t i m: ne,c c-21sary. '0\l••tio.aa ratJU"d.i.a.gl th.41 .r-e-eyaJ.u.at.J.ara ~roeed11:11ra DaJ' .ba ofii~e,i t:.1;1 a .:r1:11d.7 flat t.•r lCIIIHi
( H9) 21 !w-llitNJI
:Spae.:lal Pt"Ogztalb il!llik:f: .4.oa
-.1 ni:t-aJ.de ca..-ty l:"nm:lllpori.a:t.i~il Dapa..rtmi11:1. t Coapl•tClld (o;raa a~uuld htll ~ltad to:
fU......-•id• CC)lm.ty h-aa•P9-1'1:,atioa O.p&~t
1695 S)race S~N•t
R:!. va-.ra:.ii:ie , ca 9':Z!iio7
•~~~t J-1lcl~ wa~t•rl~IUI
98838
. .... I • 1° I . ., . • • I .1·• "-· L .... I • ._ ' • • ,:sa 1s:2
ASS~SSM..IQr.r :8.E-EVALUATlON
.A.5S~5SOR PARC~L NO•----~----
FOB s:w:::, YU OllJ,J
.. .. ..:....:.u ...... _.

CATB ____ _
~ARCEL ~lmA~ ____ ....._AC....,. • ...._ DEVBLOPED AC'RH&iE~-----......:;A~C~1:...- PRO.f.E:RTY EV.ALUA".l"IOfi =. .ABJUAJ. :PR'OTO ·---~ SITE VISIT' ___ ~-- P~OF!RTY OBSCRII'TION/COt4MENTS __ ~_
ass:e;s§MEN!: ~T.A
8A.O / 111 TJKVKLOPl!J[I ~ $ RATE
AC!l.B AC.RB.ACE /Mu
I: ;
:I I I ! i I
r I
,
l i
[. I
I - - . - -
• L '-
I
-
Rl!!:COkMm'IDED CORPJICT!D AS ~fi.SSNE"NT _,c....__----~ CSA 152 t1JJtD IIUIIILD.
• APPROl:IMTE DBWLOPE.D ACRKAGE ROIJ'ND!:D TO T~ ~ST HlJJtDiUI IJT"I FOR "1'1"I6 CAI.CULA.'rZ:Olf.

QUXSl'IOllS R.KCAR.D:nfG 'I .B!.S ASSESSMf!N'I' 1 l"'lrBASE C0Ni'I'1'.C'l' ::

I
98939
" I I • • .J - .. . , ,, I ~:. .:.li.J'"4 J . J I • • J. i'B:OCIIS!IlfG g,a .15,2 :.asumonn RB-rmw,:nOlfd :nqt'!I ::io_ "cltOnRn ;u STNIIBIS,fiT5 BS.Jll'G HJUJ.,lm { Batara sapt~r, :t.} l:'l!Cl-~v,lua.tion t~ :.ib.oii.l.!J Lrc~ 1·.ub.nittc-d to tho 5pecial Frcql.uae 5oation uf the- ~r,;,1,.mty 'I'ran.sportatior;i L)e~'.lliJt:"t..l'ICnt". p: i .. n · Lu p.ro~ct._y l.1x: :1:Jtatenents tioei n~ m.111 i I nd ( priei= t.D S Rpt.111.11.bt!!r l c.:t .l iv~""'r.:y year) • l'bol!!!I ~pproved corrt:JC t.l.on~ to the as ll'i S lilN.n"tt wU l o~ upd.a t~ to ~h~ ~omptlt• r data .ba•e a1!!1!!1,1!!!SBlourn~ nile& prior t-:i ~•n.•r11tii,n t:>! ;:cc!pe~tv to:1.X statesl4'Ma. Tb.•r. i.!3 na :=.hargra fc-r corr.etiecu: irtade ~rior to ,:.!,:,11..a.-eri~e e,t prop~rty tn statsmsnt:s.

PJl(l;QSJlfG C,I 152 Ml:l~MA:J M-mLUU'RIWS 1l,na PltftlU'J TN SD.'l!DIIRffl 3PW MI\IUID
Re-ev4l11.ation fODEi!I i:;u.bnri.tted. t.o t.be Special PrDICJram& Section after p~rty tax et.&tan:snt:e have bND m..iled 'lrill be fr;;,rnirded to the COUflty A1,1d i tQr-.-Con troll~ • s off ice for proc 1n; Bin9. '!'be lwd.i tor C'ontroJ.les:- will 1111!111.k.e the eo:n-C!c-t ion to ths pz::~rty ~ :;tat9lllen t. u B inig one a f tvo 1Mthods; 1) isB1.1e a r-~i59'd prcp-erty tax lflita.tBment I.Jr 2 l iBeoe a .:r:'Elfm:ld c ~ec k . The co.rrac:t ion to t b• ecm:put.9.r. r:LiitA bl!ll.1.n ;an nmnm:ie nt rel 11:t!J will. be roade by th~ Special. P.rogt'4llm: s~t io:n prior tu- Ui.e nlllXt t~ y~.z: ..

Mthod 1:

If 1/2 o~ tha proparty tmcaa w.r• paid on the tirst in~tll.llm.entr tho AU.d.itcr CoDtzalle.r ~ill is•ue a revised proptirty tu stata=ent $bc;-.i~g th~ '.::ilecond. in au 11..JnA:!int. bail llDce reduced by the d.if fer em::-• bet wen t:fte ~Qt~4l ~~•e~1n1ent ~nd tne ~ec:~ corruotiixi ~-~~01K1nt+ TIie vropcr ty o,wncr 111 i 11 ;l cit :.,.ee :} reiduc t icfL .i.c::: th ill ,tc t al <"...SA 1 S.l c1.asea:1!uc.e:ci.t on t..ho revifl:ed t.~ ~tate:ment, ,:.he only ne>ticel!I.Ple d.if fe.rence will be in th• ~•~and inst~ll.mt!nt balan~D due.

Mlt.b.ad 2:
1 f i:. he pfi>iia.i: t . .Y r. au:a& wBCe pa.id in ".: b.11:ir e:nt.i rot. y c1io UIII!!! .r ;u::, t. inet-a.1.1..meTit and ~hn di~fercnco bstve~n the actual ~nK~n~~~ ~mi the .recollllll.8:nded corrected -ul!lal!!l1n!lllllE!nt (!XC'eed.s S 10. DO th,~ J\1.tdit.cr Control .... tll itJIIIUI'! 111 r""lt:Uf'ld ~hec-)l to the p:COpi!!rty owner. This :Ql,lil,l' t.ak• &nywil•~- [~~ J t.Q ~ ~th~ tQ oi:eu~. m&c.b. z-..,.i..-.d :P-E'OIP•ftr ~ •-t-~a.~ ea~ N f ~ ebeek PRK:&•11 N by t•• h4itcn- &:r.nt.rc,l l•r wi lJ. coat $1:5. 00 w.b..iah -.rill be ~ to tM CD%r811paad.iD.1J CSA 1 !2 fmsd D1Dlilar.
99040
'I" 11 • _ -•1 • -r L .- 1 • I 1,. .J Ir- -l_i ,.•_I I • l'tl I L • _ •• I S~mple~
i
i

2. 1 7 Acre ~a r-cel

UNDEVELDPED
(NOT ASSESSED)
• E'ASJC UNIT
1 ciAU
douse {BAS~C UNIT 11G acre) - 1 BAU
:
-
1 /6 ACRE ;::: .1 7
ACRE
1 BAU X BAU RATE= S ASSESSMENT
99141
" . •1,t 1 • ,1 • ,1 .•.III . . . i_ .- 1 ""I '4 . J I I I ; • -1 I • • • :i..:........:.. .r_. • • U:":"'

COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL
' - ■
.. _ -
SA~JJPLC:

UNDEVELOPED
10 ACnES
(NOT. ASSESSED}
. '
DEVELOPED . . .
12 BAU / ACRE X 5 ACRES DEVELOPED ~ 60 BAUr S
so BAU X BAU RATE ~ $ ASSESS~iENT
I .. - I
, ■
...
99242
Resolution No. 1994-107

APPROVING ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR CSA 152 PROGRAM BETWEEN THE CITY OF BANNING

AND RIVERSIDE COUNTY
W~EREAS, Section 402(p) of the Federal Clean Water Act requires municipalities to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit before discharging stormwater into the waters of the United States; and,
W~EREAS, County has formed CSA 152 to finance a portion of its programs and obligations associated with the municipal NPDES permits and individual General NPDES Permits; and,
W~EREAS, cooperation between County and City in the administration and implementation of the NPDES Permits is in the best interests of County and City; and,
W~B, ERP~%City was formally annexed into CSA 152 by County Resolution No. 93-454 on December 21, 1993; and,
W~EREAB, County and City are to perform certain duties prescribed in this Agreement that will benefit all parties;
uc/ill& M. Ellzondo ~
City Clerk
OW, T~{ FORE, ER~.B~. IT RESO~. DV~.by the City Council of the City of Banning that the attached Agreement labeled Exhibit "A" be approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute the agreement.

PA,,~. D, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 27th day//of September, 19~4.

APPROVED AS TO FO.RM
Joh~ ~F. W&lson
Cit~ Attorney
99343
99444
Exhibit " A"
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR CSA 152 PROGRAM

BETWEEN

RIVERSIDE COUNTY AND CITY OF BANNING
This Agreement, entered into as of this day of 1994 by the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, hereinafter called "COUNTY", and the CITY OF BANNING, hereinafter called "CITY", establishes the responsibilities and obligations of each party concerning the management and financing of COUNTY SERVICE AREA 152, hereinafter called "CSA 152".

RECITALS
WHEREAS, Congress in 1987 added Section 402(p) to the Federal Clean Water Act CWA) [33 U. C. S1342(p)]; and,
WHEREAS, Section 402(p) requires certain municipalities, construction and industrial facilities to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit before discharging stormwater into the waters of the United States; and, WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY have obtained or will obtain a municipal NPDES Permit for each of the three watersheds of the County; and, WHEREAS, COUNTY has formed CSA 152 to finance a portion of its programs and obligations associated with the municipal NPDES Permits and individual General NPDES Permits; and,
WHEREAS, cooperation between COUNTY and CITY in the administration and implementation of the NPDES Permits is in the best interests of COUNTY and CITY; and, WHEREAS, CITY was formally annexed into CSA 152 by COUNTY Resolution No. 93-454 on December 21, 1993; and,
WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY are to perform certain duties prescribed in this 99545
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
Agreement that will benefit all parties;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:

1. DELEGATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES. The responsibilities of each party shall be as follows:

A. COUNTY shall assume the responsibilities and meet the requirements of CSA 152 administration for COUNTY and CITY by:
1) Preparing CSA 152 budget and reports in compliance with County Ordinance No. 573.
2) COUNTY shall also:
a) Prepare the required narrative for said budget and reports along with COUNTY'Sindividual budget or report on COUNTY activities.
b) Annually prepare and forward to the appropriate agency computer tape information on individual assessments of parcels within CITY for generation of Benefit Assessment Units (BAU) totals and assessments for CITY.
c) Forward CITY corrections to assessments and tax bills to Auditor° Controller/Tax Collector.
d) Review and coordinate CITY CSA 152 budget with overall CSA 152 budget.
e) Reimburse CITY for actual expenditures incurred under provision of approved CITY CSA 152 budget and allocations.
f) Conduct mailing of proposed tax rate assessment for CITY for FY 94/95 and any year CITY requires notices. COUNTY shall bill CITY for these services at cost.
g) Provide to CITY annual property assessment printouts and a BAU 2 99646
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
summary.
h) Provide to CITY standardized forms including but not limited to assessment re-evaluation forms, budget and expense reimbursement formats.
i) Serve as administrative and technical advisor on CSA budget preparation and assessment re-evaluations.
j) Assess CITY an annual six percent (6%) administrative fee on new revenue for CITY CSA 152 budget.
k) Be responsible to CITY for reasonable requests by CITY for information, billing tapes, data, changes, corrections, refunds, issuances of new CITY tax bills or revisions. Said requests will be at expense of CITY.
1) Conduct annual County public budget hearing of CSA 152. m) Assist CITY with first year CITY public information forum on NPDES program and CSA 152 administration by providing administrative and technical guidance.
n) Provide CITY with copy of CSA 152 budget prior to
submittal to COUNTY Board of Supervisors.

B. CITY shall assume the responsibilities and meet the requirements of CSA 152 administration for CITY by:
1) Preparing CITY CSA 152 budget and reports on its activities using COUNTY format, hereto attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. Said budget and reports shall be submitted to COUNTY for incorporation with COUNTY CSA 152 budget narrative and in accordance with Schedule of Events, hereto attached as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference.
3 99747
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
2) CITY shall also:
a) Conduct NPDES and CSA 152 public forum for CITY constituents prior to COUNTY CSA 152 public hearing for new or increased CSA 152 assessment over prior fiscal year assessment.
b) Be responsible for CITY updates, corrections or revisions to be entered into COUNTY data base for CSA 152 or any corrections, revisions, refunds or issuance of new CITY tax bills through COUNTY at CITY expense.
c) Be responsible to COUNTY for any proposed tax assessment printing and/or mailings CITY may want COUNTY to perform at CITY expense.
d) Be responsible for replies to CITY taxpayer inquiries and requests for CITY CSA 152 budget information and NPDES Program within CITY boundaries.
e) Provide COUNTY with CITY telephone numbers and public forum dates for CITY taxpayer inquiries on CITY CSA 152 program and for inclusion on CITY CSA 152 assessment mailings or proposed assessment increases by February 15 of each year, and keep such numbers updated as necessary.

2. FEES AND PAYMENT. COUNTY shall administer CSA 152 for the benefit of COUNTY and CITY. CITY share of annual CSA 152 administration shall be a six percent 6%) fee of CITY CSA 152 annual budget.

A. CITY shall be responsible for payment to COUNTY, at cost, for services that require:
1) COUNTY to provide information, billings tapes, data changes, corrections, refunds, issuances of new CITY tax or revisions to CITY. COUNTY shall 4 99848
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10:
11 12
13 14
15 16
18 19~
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 provide an itemized billing of completed work to CITY. 2) COUNTY to perform printing and/or mailing of proposed tax assessment rates of CITY assessed parcel numbers.

3. SHARE OF COSTS. In the event CSA 152 requires the services of a consultant, as mutually determined by COUNTY and CITY, to prepare manuals and/or perform studies such as, but not limited to, management audits and fiscal reports that are relevant to the entire CSA 152 boundary, the cost of said consultant services will be shared by COUNTY and CITY using the methodology of this Section.

A. Share of Cost Methodology. The individual percentage contribution from COUNTY and CITY shall be a function of population. Contribution shall be calculated as the population of COUNTY or CITY, divided by the aggregate total population of all CSA 152 members, thusly:
1) Contribution (%) = Xn/Xt
Xn = population of COUNTY or CITY
Xt = total population of all CSA 152 members combined.
2) The population of COUNTY, CITY and CSA 152 member cities will be based on the latest California State Department of Finance population figures issued in May of each year.

B. COUNTY shall keep CITY apprised and notified of COUNTY requests for proposal ( RFP), selection of consultant, consultant'sfee, any contract timetables and consultant schedule of payments.

4. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date the last duly authorized representative of COUNTY or CITY executes it. The term of the agreement shall be indefinite or as long as required for the Clean Water Act.

5. WITHDRAWAL FROM AGREEMENT. Either Party may withdraw from this Agreement thirty (30) days after giving written notice to other Party. In event withdrawal 5 99949
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
becomes effective, withdrawal shall constitute forfeiture by the withdrawing party of its share of costs and administrative fees paid as described in Sections 2 and 3 of this Agreement up to the effective date of withdrawal. The withdrawing party shall be responsible for all lawfully assessed penalties as a
consequence of withdrawal.

6. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGREEMENT. This Agreement may be amended by mutual consent of the parties to the Agreement. No amendment to this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the duly authorized representatives of the parties.

7. NOTICES. All notices shall be deemed duly given when delivered by hand; or five (5) days after deposit in the U. S. mail, postage prepaid.

8. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement will be governed and construed in accordance with laws of the United States and the State of California. If any provision or provisions of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired hereby.

9. CONSENT TO BREACH NOT A WAIVER. No term or provision hereof shall be deemed waived and no breach excused, unless such waiver or consent is in writing and signed by the party so waiving or consenting. Any consent by any party to, or waiver of, a breach by the other party, whether expressed or implied, shall not constitute a consent to, waiver of, or excuse for any other different or subsequent breach.

10. APPLICABILITY OF PRIOR AGREEMENTS. This Agreement and the Exhibits attached hereto constitute the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter; all CSA 152 prior agreements, representations, statements, negotiations and understandings are superseded hereby.

11. HOLD HARMLESS. Each Party shall indemnify and hold harmless the other party from liability or damages resulting from its own acts or omissions including those of its 6 100050
1 officers or employees in the performance of this Agreement. 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed as of the day and year first 3 above written.
4 CITY OF BANNING
5 ATTEST:
6 City Clerk
By
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 Mayor
Form Approved
County Counsel
BY
Deputy
City Manager

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
on behalf of CSA 152
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
ATTEST:

Gerald A. Maloney
Clerk of the Board
By
Deputy
7 100151
BUDGET FORMAT*
CITY CSA 152 (NPDES)
FY

EXHIBIT A

APPROPRIATIONS
Storm Drainage System Inspection -
36" and larger)
Initial Inspection
Underground/Open Channel
Water Quality Testing
Document Violations
Inspection Preparation Plan
Updating Construction/
Facilities Drawings
Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) -
DAMP Preparation
Implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs)
Inspection Forms for Building/Public
Works Inspectors
Additional Catch Basin Maintenance
Additional Street Sweeping in Industrial/
Commercial/Central Business Areas
Administration of Volunteer Catch Basin
Basin Stenciling
Development of Grading Ordinance
Develop BMP Manual for New Development
Inspection of Construction Sites for
Compliance of Grading Ordinance
Testing of Sediment in Sediment Basin
Spot Inspection of Commercial/Industrial
Areas for Illegal Dumping
Education
Pesticide Training for City Personnel
Permit Training Requirements for Inspectors,
Plan Checkers, Engineers and Planners
Training for Review/Inspection of BMP and
Inspection for Illegal Dumping
Utility Bill Inserts with information on
Impacts of Fuel Spills, Illegal
Dumping, Erosion, etc..
100252

Administration of NPDES Permit
Contingencies -
Other -
Legal Mailings
Assessor Line Item Charge
Riverside County Flood Control BAU computer time
Public Education Program ***
CSA 152 Administration Fee (6%)

TOTAL PROJECTED APPROPRIATIONS
Illustrative budget format. Line items may vary with Cities.

A brief narrative and cost breakdown to each appropriation.

NPDES Public Education as provided by Flood Control/County. 100353
CSA 152
SCHEDULE OF EVENTS *

EXHIBIT B
January
2 15
20 30
February
10 15
Cities and County begin CSA 152/NPDES budget process for upcoming fiscal year.

County provides updated BAU summary to first year CSA 152 Cities.

County provides statement of accounts to each City for first tax collection period of fiscal year (December). Statement reflects year to date CSA 152 revenue collected from each City and its zone of benefit (incorporated city boundaries).

City prepares and submits to County a statement of expenses for City CSA 152/NPDES program.

County receives expense statement of Cities and effects reimbursement to Cities. Reimbursement is limited to the amount of City CSA 152 revenue collected less County expenses as outlined in CSA 152 agreement. County shall submit to City on a quarterly basis County expenses for inclusion in City expense statement.

Deadline for City to notify County of proposed increase in City CSA 152 assessment rate.

March
1 10
15 15
Cities and County finalize individual CSA 152 budgets and proposed BAU assessment rates.

Deadline for first year CSA Cities or Cities with CSA rate increase to submit information for CSA legal mailing of estimated assessments.

Required information includes times, dates, appropriate addresses ofpublic forum/offices including phone numbers and proposed BAU rate of City.

City CSA 152 budgets due to County for consolidation of overall CSA 152 budget.

County conducts BAU computer and print services of CSA legal mailings for first year CSA Cities and Cities with rate increases. 1 10
10 County submits total CSA 152 budget for review and inclusion into overall County Budget.

Legal mailing date for estimated assessments on parcels for any new or proposed increases in City CSA 152 rates. County provides list of assessor parcel numbers and estimated assessments to those CSA Cities with new/increased rates.

Second installment of taxes/assessments due.
100454

May
1 10
15 20
County provides Cities with second statement of accounts for year to date City CSA 152 revenue collected.

Cities prepare and submit statement of expenses for reimbursement of CSA 152/NPDES program costs.

Cities with proposed increased CSA 152 assessments over the current year hold public forums to address City constituents and questions.

County reviews/approves expense statement of Cities and effects reimbursement to Cities.

June/July
July
15 County Board of Supervisors conducts public heatings on CSA assessments rates including CSA 152 rates or proposed rate increases. Changes may occur to CSA rates at discretion of Board.

Reconciliation of statement of accounts for County and each CSA 152 City zone of benefit). Balanced statement reflects total revenue collected for prior fiscal year. Cities may apply for balance to cover reimbursement of undeffunded City NrpDES expenses or balance is carried forward into next fiscal year within CSA 152 City account ( zone of benefit).

July/August County Board approves f'mal County budget including CSA budgets.

Budgets may change at the discretion of the Board.

September First County and City tax/assessments bills of the fiscal year are mailed.

October
15 Cities provided with update BAU summary and list of assessor parcel numbers and actual assessments.

October Cities respond to taxpayer requests for parcel re-assessments or re-evaluations and forward recommendations and corrections to County.

November
City provides BAU and assessor parcel corrections to County for updating in file.

December
10 First installment of taxes and assessments due/collected by County for current fiscal year.

Use schedule for CSA 152 planning purposes.
100555
June 30, 1995 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 11, 1995
TO: City Council
FROM: Paul Toor, Public Works Director/City Engineer
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 1995-125, "APPROVING THE BUDGET FOR CITY OF BANNING NPDES PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995-96"
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 1995-125:

I) Approving the budget for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program for fiscal year 1995-96 for an amount of $43, 00. 844.

II) Direct staff to coordinate with the County of Riverside to record assessments under CSA - 152 with estimated annual assessment Option A or Option B:

Option A) assess $3. BAU85/to find the program for fiscal year 1995/96.

Option B) to assess $1. BAU79/utilizing a portion of reserves collected under this program, Option C) not assess any charges utilizing the reserves collected under this program and other revenues if needed.

JUSTIFICA TION: It is essential to appropriate the funds for implementation of the NPDES program.

BACKGROUND: The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) is a federally mandated program to control non-permit source of water pollution enacted as part of the Clean Water Act in 1987. The Federal government did not provide any funding for the program, assigning the responsibility to the cities and county to implement and fund the same. Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) of the County of Riverside approved the formation of the community service area (CSA) 152 to fund the NPDES program. Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District is the lead agency and all the cities are participating as co-permitees to coordinate the program effectively and to minimize the costs. The implementation of the program has been delayed due to extensive planning work involved and the Regional Quality Control Board is in the process of issuance of permit.

FISCAL DA TA: Due to the delays in the implementation of the program, a small expenditure has been made during fiscal year 1994-95. The assessments for fiscal year 1994-95 were $4. BAU. 72/ Total f
100656
revenues collected as of June 1995 are $54,183 and total expenditure by the County charged to City is 7,185. In addition, there are some expenses incurred by the city which are minimal. Three options are proposed for City Council'sreview and approval. Under Option I, all the budget amounts will be assessed city wide, setting an estimated annual assessment of $3. BAU. 85/Under Option II, a sum of 23,449, 50% of available cash balance will be utilized from the reserves collected in fiscal year 1994- 95 resulting into annual assessments of $1. 79/BAU. Option Ill, it is proposed to use the reserves available from 1994-95 and does not call for any assessments for Fiscal Year 1995-96.

RECOMMENDED BY: APPROVED BY:

Pa r~or, Public Works Director/
City Engineer
I7DJII 100757
RESOLUTION NO. 1995-125

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE BUDGET FOR COUNTY SERVICE
AREA 152 TO FUND CITY'S NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE
ELIMINA TION SYSTEM (NPDES) PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995- 96 WHEREAS, the County of Riverside, by this Resolution No. 93-454 adopted December 21, 1993, annexed the City of Banning to its County Service Area (CSA) 152 at the City's request to meet the Environmental Protection Agency's requirement to obtain operating permits for discharges from storm drain systems and to pay for anticipated project costs that places an assessment on property owner's tax bills to fund expenditures required by the permit; and WHEREAS, City staff has estimated the storm water management program requirements will cost the city approximately $43, 00844.annually; and WHEREAS, a "Benefit Assessment Unit" is defined in the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Manual, the portion of which defining Benefit Assessment Unit is attached as Exhibit 1 and by this reference make a part hereof; and WHEREAS, this City Council has determined, based on staff's calculations, that annual
assessments are anticipated to be approximately $ per Benefit Assessment Unit.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council for the City of Banning hereby approves the annual budget for fiscal year 1994-95 NPDES program attached as Exhibit A".

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 11th day of July, 1995.

ArrEST:

Donald E. Smith, Mayor
City of Banning, California
City Clerk of the City of Banning
71 .. 100858

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL CONTENT:

John F. Wilson
City Attorney
CERTIFICATION:

I, Marie Calderon, City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1995-125, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California, at a Regular Meeting thereof held on the 11th day of July, 1995, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Marie Calderon, City Clerk,
City of Banning, California
17~
100959
E.)( H, B / T "It "

CITY OF BANNING
NPDES BUDGET FOR CSA 152
FY 1995-96
PERSONNEL - SALARIES AND BENEHTS 14,424

EACH CO-PERMITTEE OF THE MUNICIPAL NPDES PERMIT MUST

SUBMIT ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORTS, ADMINISTER BMP PROGRAMS,

PERFORM RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY, PREPARE ANNUAL BUDGET,

AND PERFORM VARIOUS OTHER TASKS AS REQUIRED BY THE
RWQCB.

ASSISTANT ENGINEER (57950 x .10)
PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR (48675 x .10)
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN (37615 x .10)
STORM DRAIN SYSTEM INSPECTION 4,600
INITIAL INSPECTION ( 1200)
MAP EXISTING S.D. FACILITIES ( 2000)
WATIiR QUALITY TESTING (1000)
DOCUMENT VIOLATIONS (400)
DRAINAGE AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN (DAMP) 8,650

DAMP PREPARATION (RCFC & WCD)

IMPLEMENTATION OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
INSPECTION FORMS FOR PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR (250)
ADDITIONAL CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE ( 2000)
ADDITIONAL STREET SWEEPING (1800)
CATCH BASIN STENCILING (1500)
DEVELOPMENT OF GRADING ORDINANCE (1800)
DEVELOPMENT OF BMP MANUAL FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (800)

SPOT INSPECTION OF COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL
AREAS FOR ILLEGAL DUMPING (500)
EDUCATION 5,700
PESTICIDE TRAINING FOR CITY PERSONNEL (1200)

PERMIT TRAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR INSPECTORS, PLAN
CHECKERS, ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS (500)
INSPECTOR TRAINING TO ENFORCE BMP'S (500)

UTILITY BILL INSERTS WITH INFORMATION ON IMPACTS FUEL
SPILLS, ILLEGAL DUMPING, EROSION, ETC (3500)

73.101060
CONTINGENCIES 10%
OThER
3,340
5,930
LEGAL MAILINGS 29 X 7448 (2160) ASSESSOR LINE ITEM CHARGE .25 X 7448 1870) RCFC & WCD BAU COMPUTER TIME (1900)
CSA ADMINISIRATION FEE 1,200
TOTAL 43,844
ESTIMATED BAD'SINCLUDING 10% DEFAULT RATE
ESTIMATED BAU RATE:
11,368

3.85 1'/ .101161
ooUNTY SERVICE AREA 152 - NPDES
aTY OF BANNING ACCOUNT
FI.SCAL YEAR 94/95 - AS OF JUNE 23. 1995
L FY 94/95 Secorcd Tax Ron
Revenue Fixed Cbarg.e5

2. FY 94/95 City Pan;el Paid listing
Revcuue CoJ1ectedI
Jamwy 31.185
May 22,998
June Due
July Due

3. FY 94/95 City CSA 152 lhpenses
Mailing 2,138
As.sessor Une Charge 1.,247
Flood BAU Charge 560
CSA AdIDin Fee 3~

4. FY 94/95 City of Banning NPDES Expemes
To Date
S. Total City of BaDøiDg,lCSA 152 ÐqJense8

6. BaIaDa: Available
H of June 23. 1995
59,859
54,183
7,185
0 7,185
46,998
1 Adual ~ collectcd/pos1Cd to City aAXXJI1JI1.
a Admin Fee is 6% of projected FY 94/95 revenue - $54,000 ($3,240). 175 ., 101262
I
Exhibit A

CSA 152 FY 95/96 PARCEL FEES/BUDGET
FY 95-96 lD; FY 95/96 lm;l
FY 94/95
l.M . 2! Ilw1W ~ Parcel Fee' ..Qu¡m Parcel Fee
CSA 152 3, 000596, 3,53L383 507,647
Banning 54,000 54,000 .$ 4æ-i' 9,Tl3 $ 4,72
Cathedral Ci1y 167,000 167,000 $ 8.48 16,815 $ 8.48
Coac;bella 0 0 $ 0.00 3,844 ofa
Corona 223,000 223,000 $ 5,82 24,449 55.82
Desrt Ht Srp 11,000 11,000 $ 1.57 9,385 51.57
Indin 0 0 SO.OO 12,347 ala
La Quinta 105,000 105,000 $ 9.99 12,719 $ 9.99
Lake Elsinore 149,000 149,000 $ 13.88 12,000 n/a
Moreno Valley 387,000 387,000 - 5&l5-? 38,648 $ 1.55
Murneta. 130,000 130,000 $ 10.00 13,708 $ 10.00
Nora) 50,000 So,OOO $ 5.78 6,404 $ 5.78
Palm Dcsen 0 0 so.oo 19,028 o/a.

Palm Sprinp 337,000 337,000 $ 9~ 25,810 $ 9.50
Rancbo Mirage 68.000 68,000 $ 4.68 1Q,23O $ 4.68
Riverside aty 270.000 270,000 S283 fiS,626 S2.83
San Jacinto 45,000 45.000 $ 426 ID,9S0 nfa
1, 000996. 1, 000996, 289,988
Riverside Co 1. 00060. 1 4: 38330. S7.rn" lWfiQ $ 791
3, 000596, 3,83531, 507,647
Parc:c1 Fee is Beuefit Assessment Unit (BAli) rate. FY 95/96 fees remain the same as FY 94/95 except for Moreno Valley ($8.15), Lake EJ.sinme ($13.88. DeW CSA member) and San Jac:into (5426 . new CSA member).

Riverside County baa two mBe rates per Board aetÎ.OI1 Fcb 1, 1994. Urb8jJ. rate is S7.rn and rural rate is $4.09 fOr Zl,CXKJ parçeis.

Po8t-ir" Fax Nole
To
CaJDIøl
111 101363
S1 ATE OF CALIFORNIA - CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMEN, ~LPROTECTION AGENCY CALIFORNIA PETE WILSON Govemo. REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD COLORADO RIVER BASIN. REGION 7 73-720 FRED WARING DR., SUITE 100
PALM DESERT, CA 922<;0
Phone ( 619) 346-7491
FAX (GI9) 341-6620
0 ¿ , JÎ,J
APR 2 8 1994 r',! rf. 111& íE1l!
Bruce C. Daniels, City Manager
City of Coachella
1515 Sixth Street
Coachella, CA 92236
RE: Areawide Municipal Storm Water Program for the Coachella Valley This letter is to inform you that the City of Coachella is a storm water required to finance
Regulations, Part
pollution prevention program. Title 40 of the Code of Federal Pollutant
122, Section 26 ( 40 CPR 122.26) requires that a National Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) Permit be obtained for of storm water in areas discharges letter dated March
designated by the Director of the NPDES Program. In a
14, 1991, the Regional Board's Executive Officer the Whitewater River Basin designated Region as an area subject to the requirements for municipal statutory separate storm sewer system permits.

There is no question that the storm water program is federally mandated and support funding is not available. However, this benefits for the
program does provide significant
Valleycitizens of Coachella and all the citizens of the Coachella Many citizens are unaware that storm water runoff is a water leading cause of quality impairment throughout the nation. This pollution program emphasizes prevention, a common sense and much more cost effective rather than approach, cleaning up polluted storm water. public Examples of such measures include education, regulatory powers ( e. g., ordinances). programs to detect illegal connections and discharges, and land use elimination of storm water
planning. all of which emphasize pollution at its source. problem,
Since all
a
municipalities contribute to the cumulative storm water pollution cooperative, coordinated approach to its essential. For management and control is this
the City of Coachella) ,
reason, the t2n cities in the Coachella Valley (including Flood Control and Water
along
Conservation
with the County of Riverside, Riverside County District, and Coachella District, have Valley Water formed together as a group to be regulated under a
Part I of the single permit.
application is
permit application was submitted on May 17, 1992, and Part 2 of the expected to be submitted on May 17, 1994. As a Part 2 requirement of the application, a fiscal
applicants will
analysis must be provided showing how the co- provide the operational and maintenance expenditures to accomplish the activities necessary CPR 122. d)( vi)). 26((
specified in the storm water management program ( 40
Most of the co-applicants of the permit have decided to finance their storm water properties
programs through
within
County Service Agreement 152 ( CSA 152), a tax assessment on the areas serviced by the agreement. It is our that Coachella has decided to understanding join CSA 152, but proposes not to assess a fee to 171 101464
Bruce C. Daniels, City Manager
City of Coachella

property owners within the City, thereby, generating no revenues to program. support the
Unless there is an alternative plan for
effectively financing, the City will be unable to implement its storm water program. This could violations of the eventually lead to Valley, which is
areawide municipal storm water permit for the Coachella expected to be adopted by the Regional Board in Violations of early 1995. this permit could lead to significant enforcement action Regional Board by the administrative
against the City including issuance of a Cease and Desist Order. imposition of civil monetary liability, or Attorney General for referral to the judicial assessment of up to $50,000 per day of violation, in addition to injunctive relief.

Please submit a
response to this letter by May 17, 1994, indicating the the City of Coachella intends to take to finance action(s) its storm water program.

If you have any questions or comments regarding this
Vincent Christian of letter, please contact the Regional Board staff at (619) 776-8933. r
VC/ci
cc: All co-applicants ( see attached list)
Elizabeth Jennings, OCC
Bruce Fujimoto, DWQ
Mike Cohen, CVAG
Jennifer Cohen, Woodward and Clyde
Gilbert Rangel, County of Riverside, Administrative Office File Ref: STIl MUN GC 1. 0
171.101565

SUBMITTAL TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ITEM:19.1
(tD # 25313)
MEETING DATE:

Tuesday, July 09, 2024
FROM : OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: Public Hearing on the Adoption of Resolution No. 2024-117, County Service Area Charges for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. All Districts. [$0]

1. Conduct a Public Hearing to Allow Public Testimony Regarding Enactment of the Proposed County Service Area Charges for Fiscal Year 2024-2025, as Shown in Exhibit A of Resolution No.2024-117: and

2. At the Close of the Public Hearing, Adopt Resolution No. 2024-117, a Resolution of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside Adopting Charges for Extended Services Provided in County Service Areas for Fiscal Year 2024-2025.

ACTION: Policy

MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
On motion of Supervisor Gutierrez, seconded by Supervisor Jeffries and duly carried by unanimous vote, lT WAS ORDERED that the above matter is approved as recommended.

Ayes:

Nays:

Absent:

Date:
xc:

Jeffries, Spiegel, Washington, Perez and Gutierrez
None
None
July I, 2024
OED
Kimberly A. Rector
Clerk of the Board

By
Depu

19.1 RECOMMENDEO MOTION: That the Board of Supervisors:
101666

SUBMITTAL TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FINANCIAL
DATA
Cu116nt Flscal Year: TotalCost: Ongolng Co3t
COST $0 $0 $0 $0
NET COUNTY COST $0 $0 $0 $o
SOURCE OF FUNDS: N/A
Budget Adjustment: N/A
For Fiscal Year 24125
C.E.O. RECOMMENDATION: Approve
BACKGROUND:

Summary
The State legislature enacted the County Service Area Law to provide broad statutory authority for county Boards of Supervisors to County Service Areas (CSA) as a method to finance and provide needed public facilities and services within unincorporated areas of the county.

Pursuant to Riverside County Ordinance No. 573 and Government Code section 25215 et seq., the proposed fiscal year 2024-2025 charges are attached as Exhibit A. County Service Areas provide municipal services to residential neighborhoods such as landscape maintenance, street lighting, street sweeping and road maintenance. The services each community receives are determined during the planning phase of new development, and the cost associated with providing those services are unique to each community. All new residential development is required to prepare an engineer's report that allows for annual adjustments by the greater of two percent or the cumulative percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CP|-U), as applicable. Rising utility costs for electricity, water, and trash services as well as increases in labor costs require some CSA charges to increase to ensure the successful delivery of municipal services. Further, Riverside County Ordinance No. 573 Section 3 sets the parameters for the annual setting of charges for CSAS. A written report of (1) the extended services provided in the County by county service areas, and each county service area extending each such service, (2) each parcel of real property within each county service area, and which extended services each such parcel receives, and (3) the amount of charge to each such parcel for each extended service provided thereto. At the public hearing the Board of Supervisors shall hear and consider all objections and protests, if any, to the report. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Board of Supervisors may by resolution adopt, revise, change, reduce, or modify any charge and shall make a determination upon each charge as described in the report.
lmpact on Residents and Businesses
County Service Areas allow communities in unincorporated areas to pay for and receive specific municipal services. These services are unique to each community and offer a quality-of-life enhancement.

ATTACHMENT
E Resolution No. 2024-117
tr Exhibit A - Proposed County Service Areas Charges

101767

SUBMITTAL TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

101868
\-
I
2 J
4 5
6 7
8 9
l0
11 l2
l3
14 l5
16 L!
\n
(.d
TU
U) z
o=
o
E
z
e
oIL
=E.
z.
o
U)
-)LIJ z
a v
ul
z
I t7
18 l9
20 2t
22 l3
o>L@
25 26
27 28
oard of Su

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPE VISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

ADOPTING CHARGES FOR EXTENDED SERVICES

PROVIDED IN COUNTY SERVICE AREAS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code section 25215.4, the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") is permilted, by resolution or ordinance, to establish user fees, rates, or other charges that are not property-related and to collect said fees, rates, or charges for the services and facilities that the County Service Area ("CSA") provades; WHEREAS, Section 2 of ordinance No. 573 of the County of Riverside provides that all parcels of real property within the boundaries of a CSA shall be subject to a charge for each extended service provided in the service area, and that all such charges shall be computed on the basis ofbeneflt conrerred to each parcel, without regard to the assessed value ofsuch parcel; WHEREAS, Section 6 of Ordinance No. 573 ordains the Board of Supervisors, for every fiscal year, to determine the nature, extent and cost of the extended services to be provided by and within each County Service Area, in conjunction with the proceedings for adoption of the budget for the County;
WHEREAS, Section 6 of Ordinance No. 573 further provides that the rate of charge for each service shall be computed by dividing the net cost of each such service by the total number of parcels in the service area receiving lhe particular service; 07to9t2024 19.1
Countv of Riverside
RESOLUTTON NO. 2024-1 17
101969
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
l1
12 t3
t4
l5
l6
17 l8
t9
20 21
22 23
24 2s
26 28
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 573 requires that the Board of Supervisors conduct a public hearing to hear and consider testimony regarding extended services and charges to be applied within County Service Areas within the County of Riverside; WHEREAS, any person affected by the proposed charges may submit written comments to the Clerk of the Board before the hearing or may appear in support of, or opposition to, the proposals at the time of the hearing; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing pursuant to Government Code Section 25215 et seq. was conducted by this Board of Supervisors on July 09, 2024, to determine the appropriate charges for the liscai year 2024-2025 shown on Exhibit ''A";
NOW, THEREFORE, BE lT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, in regular session assembled on July 09, 2024, al 9:30 am or soon thereafler in the meeting room of the Board of Supervisors located on the 1st floor of the County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California, that the County Service Area charges as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference are adopted for fiscal year 2024-2025,
Chair of the Board of Su
Chuck Washington
ors
ATTEST:

Kimberly A. Rector
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
By
Deputy
07t09t2024 19.1
102070
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 l0
ll
t2
l3
t4
l5
t6
t7
t8
l9
20 21
22 23
24 25
Board of Sunervisors
RESOLUTION NO. 2024.I I7
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COT]NTY OF RIVERSIDE

ADOPTING CHARGES FOR EXTENDED SERVICES

PROVIDED IN THE COUNTY SERVICE AREAS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025
ROLL CALL:

The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of a resolution duly adopted by said Board of Supervisors on the date therein set forth.

By:
0710912024 t9.t
OUNTY OF RryERSID
KIMBERLY A. RECTOR. Clerk of said Board
Deputy
Ayes:

Nays:

Absent:

Jeffries, Washington, Spiegel, Perez, and Gutierez
None
None
102171

COUNTY SERVICE AREA CHARGES

EXHIBIT A
The report below reflects the extended services currently provided along with the assessment range from lowest to highest. The exact charge and extended services provided for a particular parcel may be obtained by calling the Office of Economic Development at 866.504.2067.

CSA# SERVICES PROVIDED PARCELS(1) FY 2024-2025(2)
1 Lighting 83 $12.28
13 Lighting 166 $9.36
22 Lighting 483 $1.76 to $45.95
27 Lighting 432 $20.66 to $79.80
36 Lighting, Park & Recreation 3,565 $35.00
43 Lighting 379 $13.20 to $91.64
*51 Lighting, Water, Sewer 169 $529.00 to $59,700.00
59 Lighting 70 $21.02
62 Lighting, Water, Sewer 331 $60.00
69 Lighting 3,214 $7.54 to $246.55
84 Lighting 2,360 $39.34 to $109.95
*85 Lighting, Park Maintenance 3,310 $20.00 to $338.58
87 Lighting 621 $32.32 to $88.84
89 Lighting 457 $51.70
91 Lighting 2,606 $51.24 to $79.39
94 Lighting 49 $6.04
*97 Lighting 1,054 $18.06 to $3,486.37
103 Lighting 11,919 $27.10 to $136.45
104 Roads 1,311 $65.00
105 Roads 395 $125.00
108 Roads 151 $85.00
113 Lighting 12 $55.00
115 Lighting and Road Maintenance 569 $34.35
117 Lighting 598 $12.17 to $225.72
*121 Lighting, Drainage Basin 4,900 $7.38 to $373.06
122 Lighting, Water 404 $110.00
124 Roads 547 $5.00
*126 Lighting, Landscaping, Park & Rec, Sheriff 3,246 $120.00 to $8,021.52 128E Roads 432 $75.00
128W Roads 113 $75.00
132 Lighting 3,199 $22.43 to $229.88
*134 Lighting, Landscaping, Park & Recreation 7,216 $28.86 to $1,707.81 135 Lighting 209 $6.52 to $68.08
142 Lighting 258 $31.50 to $111.31
*143 Lighting, Landscaping, Park & Recreation 3,971 $98.14 to $14,749.24 146 Street Lighting 33 $124.50
149 Roads 1,541 $200.00 to $292.98
*149A Landscaping 46 $3,352.21 to $4,176.49
*152 NPDES 73,005 $3.06 to $4,597.98
152 Drainage Basin 5,895 $42.75 to $839.76
152B Regional Sports Facilities 2,152 $250.00 to $996.16 152 NPDES City of Corona 39,610 $10.00 BAU
City of Desert Hot Springs 9,373 $10.00 BAU
City of Lake Elsinore 19,462 $13.88 BAU
City of La Quinta 22,323 $9.98 BAU
City of Moreno Valley 47,083 $8.14 BAU
City of Murrieta 32,677 $10.00 BAU
City of Norco 7,180 $10.00 BAU
City of Palm Springs 28,977 $9.50 BAU
City of Rancho Mirage 13,782 $4.68 BAU
City of Riverside 71,994 $10.00 BAU
City of San Jacinto 13,505 $10.00 BAU

1. The actual parcels / lots may change depending upon parcel splits / changes.

2. The exact charge for a particular parcel may be obtained upon request by calling the Office of Economic Development 866.504.2067. *These CSAs include residential, multi-family and commercial parcels 102272

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Douglas Schulze, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Nate Smith, Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer Art Vela, Director of Public Works
MEETING DATE: December 10, 2024
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution 2024-197, Awarding a Professional Services Agreement to Webb Municipal Finance, LLC for Municipal Assessments Services to Reinstate County Service Area 152, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Assessment in the amount of $19,650 Including a 10% Contingency, and Updating the City Council on Public Outreach Efforts related to the Reinstatement of the County Service Area 152 Stormwater Assessment
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2024-197.

BACKGROUND:

The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) is a federally mandated program to control non-point sources of runoff pollution. The NPDES program is part of the Clean Water Act enacted by Congress in 1987. The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin, Region No. 7, in implementing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s storm water NPDES permit program, requires that Districts and Incorporated Cities within the Whitewater River Basin obtain a joint permit to discharge storm water into the various storm channels and washes throughout the Whitewater River Watershed area. The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) and Riverside County are acting as the Lead Agency with the City of Banning being a copermittee, along with the various other agencies and municipalities located within the Whitewater River Basin. This current Permit was adopted by the Regional Board on June 20, 2013, expired on June 19, 2018 and has been negotiated and worked on with the affected parties over the past six years. A new permit (“2025 NPDES Permit”) which has resulted from the ongoing negotiations with the Regional Board is currently in review. It is anticipated to be adopted by the end of fiscal year (FY) 2024/2025 and will take effect 90 days later.

The City of Banning is required, through Best Management Practices (BMPs), to implement practices within our community which reduce pollutants entering into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The major components of the existing and 2025 NPDES Permit to implement the BMPs include: project management, attendance at Desert Task Force meetings, record keeping and Annual Report preparation; illegal dumping and illicit connection detection, inspection, spill prevention and cleanup activities; commercial and industrial facilities inspections (about 60 per year) and the review of all City issued business licenses for SB 205 compliance; implementing land development and plan review procedures including plan check, preparing Conditions of Approval, reviewing erosion control plans and WQMPs and ensuring post construction self-inspections are performed annually by required businesses; enforcing and implementing construction activities requirements of City and private 1023
development projects including construction site inspections, review of developer’s BMPs, erosion control plans and SWPPPs (Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans), and ensuring compliance with the Regional Board’s Construction General Permit requirements; maintaining City facilities, including the City Corporate and Water Yards and Fire Station, and storm drains and performing inspections and maintenance, removing trash and debris from the storm drain system, and from roads through street sweeping; and implementing public education and outreach programs by providing brochures to the public at City events and at the public counter, to businesses and contractors through inspections and storm water training of municipal staff.

The main new requirements of the 2025 NPDES Permit are:
• Asset Management
• Fiscal Cost Analysis/Cost Reporting
• Urban Pesticides
• Trash Amendment/Trash Capture Device Installation
• New Construction General Permit
• Continued SB 205 Compliance, business license verification of SIC Codes The NPDES program costs the City about $300,000 annually to manage the current NPDES Permit. The new 2025 NPDES Permit will cost more due to its new requirements. One way to generate revenue for the program would be to reinstate a “grandfathered” assessment from 1994, called the County Service Area (CSA) 152 NPDES assessment. This stormwater assessment is currently collected by the County on behalf of a number of participating cities via property tax bills. The County administers and manages the CSA 152 program funds pursuant to CSA 152 Administrative Services Agreements with the participating cities. The County last collected the assessment in the City in 1994 at a rate of $4.72/BAU/year. A BAU is a “benefit assessment unit” as defined by the County. If the assessment is resumed, an owner of a single-family home in the City would pay 1 BAU/year, amounting to $ 4.72/year.

Since the rate was adopted in 1994 prior to the passage of Proposition 218, any increase in the rate would require a Proposition 218 Hearing and vote through an assessment balloting proceeding.

Recent Updates
Engineering Division staff met with the Riverside County Economic Development Office and the City Attorney’s Office several times over the past year to gather information and determine if the City or County had ever withdrawn from the CSA 152 Administrative Services Agreement with the County. After researching this, it appears neither the City nor County ever withdrew from the CSA 152 Agreement and, if the City Council would be inclined to do so, the City could have the County resume collecting the assessment starting in FY 2025/2026. In essence, the stormwater assessment is “grandfathered in” as an allowable assessment prior to Proposition 218 so long as the rate is not increased.

Additionally, there appears to be a reserve of about $46,000 collected by the County from 1994 that was not utilized for City stormwater expenses and thus is due to be reimbursed to the City, for qualified stormwater expenses. These funds could be used to pay for the CSA 152 Assessment consultant and other stormwater expenses.

Background on CSA 152 NPDES Assessment
LAFCO annexed the City of Banning into County Service Area 152 when the County of Riverside adopted Resolution No. 93-454 (Attachment 3) on December 21, 1993, at the City’s request, in order to have the County place an assessment on property owner’s tax bills to fund expenditures required by the NPDES Permit. On March 22, 1994, City Council Resolution No. 1994-028 (Attachment 4) was adopted to fund the City’s NPDES program, whereby the annual assessment rate for FY 1994/1995 for CSA 152 was set at $4.72 per Benefit Assessment Unit.

On September 27, 1994 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1994-107, approving the Administrative Services Agreement (“1994 Agreement”) for the CSA 152 Program between the City of Banning and 1024
Riverside County, shown as Attachment 5. The County had formed CSA 152 to finance portions of its programs and obligations associated with its Municipal NPDES Permit. The 1994 Agreement sets forth the responsibilities of the County and City with respect to the assessment. It provides for the City to annually approve a budget and report its activities in connection with its NPDES costs to the City. In addition, the City is responsible for updating parcel information for properties in the City. The County incorporates the City’s budget and the budgets of other participating cities into the County’s CSA 152 budget, holds an annual hearing, approves the assessments, and submits the assessments for collection on the Tax Roll. Both County and City Engineering Division staff performed research, and no records were found showing either party has ever withdrawn from this Agreement. Numerous other cities also joined CSA 152 to ensure funding of their NPDES program.

On July 11, 1995, by approving Resolution No. 1995-125 (Attachment 6), the City Council elected to use reserves (Option C) from the previous FY 1994/1995 instead of requiring that the property owners be assessed in FY 1995/1996. Therefore, the annual assessment was $0.00 per BAU for FY 1995/1996. It should be noted there was a surplus that first year because the NPDES program was just starting.

Further research shows that no annual staff reports or resolutions were approved by City Council to allow for collection of the annual assessment in subsequent years.

Calculation of the CSA 152 Assessment
In late 1993, the County of Riverside annexed the City of Banning into its CSA 152. The City, acting through the County and CSA 152, is able to collect an assessment on individual parcels within the City that contain a structure. Each parcel is assigned a certain number of "benefit assessment units" or "BAUs." For instance, a single-family home, regardless of its size, is assigned one BAU, while commercial property is assigned 12 BAUs per acre. One BAU costs the property owner $4.72/year.

Vacant and undeveloped land is exempt, regardless of its land use code.

When CSA 152 was formed, the County determined the formula and methodology to use to calculate the number of BAUs for each type of property. The details and examples of calculations for various land uses are shown on Resolution No. 1994-028 (Attachment 4), starting on page 4 of 12, which is County Ordinance No. 573. A parcel’s land use was used to determine its runoff coefficient and BAU/acre (listed in the table), and the developed (assumed to be impervious) area in acres of the parcel is used to determine the number of BAUs and thus cost per year. If the CSA 152 stormwater assessment is proposed to resume, a municipal assessment consultant will be hired by the City to calculate the BAUs for each parcel to be placed on the Tax Roll.

As an example calculation, a Commercial/Industrial property (see below table, Group A, with 12 BAUs/Acre) that is a 10.0 acre commercial/industrial parcel, with a developed area of 8.0 acres, with a City of Banning BAU rate of $4.72 per year:

No. of BAUs = (Developed Parcel Area) X 12 BAUs/Acre = 8 X 12 = 96 BAUs Therefore, the assessment would be: 96 BAUs X $4.72/BAU = $453.12 per year.

The Table below shows the six (6) categories of land use, their respective runoff factors and the BAU per acre. Note that a single-family residence was used as the basis for one BAU. It is the proportionate runoff from a 1/6 acre or .17 acre property for one BAU and other sized parcels and land uses will have multiples of this basic unit.

CSA 152 Update: Public Outreach Performed and Schedule of Requirements to Reenact CSA 152 On September 24, 2024, a workshop was presented by the Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer and the City Council decided that they would like to pursue reinstating the CSA 152 assessment. The staff report and related documents are included as Attachment 8. A public participation and community outreach phase occurred in October and November of 2024 (summary is shown as Attachment 9) to let the residents and property owners know of public meetings held with the Public 1025
Works Department to explain the CSA 152 assessment and its purpose with regard to providing funds for the NPDES Program.

Three Open House presentations were given to the residents as follows:
• Banning Public Library, October 28th from 4:00 pm to 5:45 pm • Banning Senior Center, October 30th, from 10:00 am to 11:00 am • Sun Lakes HOA, November 5th, from 1:00 pm to 3:00 pm
Flyers advertising the meetings and containing important facts, a FAQ Fact sheet, and CivicSpace project website were created, and the City’s website Stormwater page was updated. The Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer presented the PowerPoint presentation and answered any questions the public had. The main question from the public was whether or not the CSA 152 rate of $4.72/BAU would increase each year. The response was that the rate cannot increase without a Prop 218 hearing and ballot procedure. Overall, the feedback from the public is in support of reinstating the CSA 152 stormwater assessment.

The CSA 152 Agreement with the County of Riverside is being updated by the County and was given to staff in mid-November of 2024 for staff and City Attorney’s Office review. There are no significant changes; their Administration Fee for managing the assessment funds for the cities will remain at 6% of the revenues collected. It is anticipated that in January of 2025, this new CSA 152 Agreement will be bought to City Council for consideration and execution.

The City Council will then be asked to approve the NPDES budget and current assessment rate/levy of $4.72/BAU for FY 2025/2026 in the Spring of 2025. The City would need to provide the County with the list of Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) to place on the FY 2025/2026 Tax Roll by mid-May of 2025.

Cities must provide any updates/additional parcels from new development annually to the County. Webb Municipal Finance, LLC or a firm with similar expertise could manage this process for the City in subsequent fiscal years.

Consultant Contract
A Request for Proposals (RFP) 24-086, “Municipal Assessments Services to Reinstate County Service Area (CSA 152) Stormwater Assessment”. was prepared to hire a municipal district financing consultant firm. On October 2, 2024, Purchasing Division staff released the RFP through the Open Gov electronic bidding program notifying qualified firms of the opportunity to provide proposals. The RFP was advertised in the Press Enterprise on October 11, 2024, shown as Attachment 10. This RFP Scope of Work provides for preparing the required Assessment/Levy Report to determine the number of benefit assessment units (BAUs) for each property within the City, identify which parcels within the City are eligible to be assessed and prepare any required assessment documents.

On October 2, 2024, Purchasing Division staff released the RFP through the OpenGov program notifying qualified firms of the opportunity to provide proposals, (RFP) 24-086, “Municipal Assessments Services to Reinstate County Service Area (CSA 152) Stormwater Assessment”. The deadline for submitting proposals was October 30, 2024 and three (3) firms responded with submittals.

An evaluation committee consisting of three (3) City staff members, evaluated the three (3) proposals that were received based on qualifications of key personnel, experience in preparing CSA 152 Assessment Reports in Riverside County, approaches in providing the scope of work services, references, and price proposals.

Listed below are the three (3) firms that submitted proposals in order of the total combined score received from the three (3) evaluators:

CONSULTANT TOTAL SCORE
1026
Webb Municipal Finance, LLC 85.00
Harris & Associates 80.33
NBS 74.33
Webb Municipal Finance, LLC received the highest score, and their Proposal and Fee Proposal are shown as Attachments 11 and 12, respectively. The company is a reputable qualified firm that has successfully provided services to the City in the past with LMD No. 1 annexations and Prop 218 financial analysis and ballot proceedings, and they have performed similar CSA 152 services for several cities within the same CSA 152 group and as a result, staff recommends the contract award to Webb Municipal Finance, LLC in the amount of $19,650.

The City Council will be asked to approve the NPDES budget and current BAU rate of $4.72/BAU for FY 25/26 in the Spring of 2025. The City would need to provide the County with the list of Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) to place on the FY 2025/2026 Tax Roll by mid-May of 2025. Cities must provide any updates/additional parcels from new development annually to the County. Webb Municipal Finance, LLC could manage this process for the City in future fiscal years, if the City needs assistance, for up to four single additional years. This would make the Agreement term for up to five years, based upon satisfactory performance each year. A “not to exceed” total five year contract amount of $60,000 is requested to assist with new assessment roll updates from new development and unanticipated work that could not be done in house, if needed. The effort and consultants cost required to calculate all of the BAUs for each assessable City property is much higher for this initial year than in subsequent years.

JUSTIFICATION:

The upcoming 2025 NPDES Permit will become effective in late 2025 and it has new and enhanced requirements that will significantly impact the City financially, as additional computer software, trash capture devices, consultant costs and City staff time will be needed.

FISCAL IMPACT:

CSA 152 provides a funding mechanism for the NPDES program. Eleven cities, including Palm Springs, Rancho Mirage, and Desert Hot Springs also joined CSA 152 to ensure funding of their NPDES program.

The County adopted Resolution No. 2024-117 on July 9, 2024, adopting charges for the County Service Areas, including CSA 152, for FY 2024/2025, shown as Attachment 7. Since assessments have not been collected from properties in the City since 1994, the funding source for the NPDES program is now absorbed by City of Banning Streets Department (Fund 100). The Public Works Dept., Streets Division assists with the implementation and Engineering Division staff manages the NPDES program in-house.

Consultants are utilized for Water Quality Management Plan and Erosion Control Plan review (the developer pays these fees through deposits) and for NPDES stormwater and industrial waste inspections. The NPDES program costs the City about $300,000 annually to manage the current NPDES Permit. Those costs are expected to be much higher (likely 35%) with the new permit given the new mandates. Current costs for compliance with the NPDES is a financial strain on the Streets Fund and any increase in costs would likely have to be supplemented by a General Fund transfer. The municipal special district financing consultant will determine the estimated revenue to be collected from the assessment, and a rough estimate would be between $75,000 and $110,000/year, which would substantially help with the NPDES program costs. Stormwater program responsibilities are completed by about ten (10) Public Works Dept. staff members on a part-time and as-needed basis, but there are no full-time staff assigned to the program.

In anticipation of the upcoming new 2025 NPDES Permit cost/fiscal reporting requirements, a new stormwater fund Account 105 was created to track expenses. A budget appropriation and transfer in the amount of $19,650 (inclusive of the 10% contingency) from the Streets Fund (100) to Account No. 105- 6100-455.33-11 (Professional Services) is needed to fund the Professional Services Agreement. The cost for any updates to the Assessment Roll in future years will be budgeted into the 105-6100-455.33- 11 account.
1027
ALTERNATIVES:

If the City Council elects to not approve this Resolution, there will be no CSA 152 stormwater assessment collected on the FY 2025/2026 Tax Roll. The NPDES Program would continue to be an unfunded mandate, with no revenue collected to support the program. and its costs would continue to be absorbed by the Streets Fund, which is currently fiscally strained. The new 2025 NPDES Permit has significant costs associated with it and will continue to rise over the future. The NPDES Permit must be complied with to avoid fines from Regional Board No. 7 of the State Water Resources Control Board.

BUDGETED?:

No
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT:

Yes
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 2024-197 CSA 152.docx

2. Reso 2024-197 Exhibit A PSA to WMF.pdf

3. Att. 2 - CSA 152 Presentation.pptx

4. Att. 3 - County Reso. No. 93-454, formation of CSA 152, 12.21.93.pdf

5. Att. 4 - CC Reso. No. 1994-028, approving initial CSA 152 rates, 3.22.94.pdf

6. Att. 5 - CC Reso. No. 1994-107, approving CSA 152 Agree.pdf

7. Att. 6 - CC Reso. No. 1995-125, asking Council to approve or cease CSA 152, 7.11.95.pdf

8. Att. 7 - County Reso. 2024-117, CSA adoption FY 2425, 7.9.24.pdf

9. Att. 8 - Sept. 24, 2024 Workshop Info.pdf

10. Att. 9 - Public Outreach Summary.pdf

11. Att. 10 - Press Enterprise Proof of Ad, 10.11.24.pdf

12. Att. 11 - Webb Municipal Finance Proposal, 10.30.24.pdf

13. Att. 12 - Webb Municipal Finance Fee Proposal, 10.30.24.pdf 1028

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Douglas Schulze, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Nate Smith, Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer Art Vela, Director of Public Works
MEETING DATE: January 14, 2025
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution 2025-02, Approving the Administrative Services Agreement between Riverside County and the City of Banning related to County Service Area 152, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater (NPDES) Assessment
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2025-02.

BACKGROUND:

The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) is a federally mandated program to control non-point sources of runoff pollution. The NPDES program is part of the Clean Water Act enacted by Congress in 1987. The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin, Region No. 7 (“Regional Board”), in implementing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s storm water NPDES permit program, requires that the Districts and Incorporated Cities within the Whitewater River Basin obtain a joint permit to discharge storm water into the various storm channels and washes throughout the Whitewater River Watershed area. The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) and Riverside County are acting as the Lead Agency with the City of Banning being a co-permittee, along with the various other agencies and municipalities located within the Whitewater River Basin. The current Permit was adopted by the Regional Board on June 20, 2013, expired on June 19, 2018 and has been negotiated and worked on with the affected parties over the past six years. A new permit (“2025 NPDES Permit”) that has been negotiated with the Regional Board is in review. It is anticipated to be adopted by the end of FY 2024/2025 and will take effect 90 days later.

The City of Banning is required, through Best Management Practices (BMPs), to implement practices within our community which reduce pollutants entering into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The major components of the existing and 2025 NPDES Permit to implement the BMPs include: project management, attendance at Desert Task Force meetings, record keeping and Annual Report preparation; illegal dumping and illicit connection detection, inspection, spill prevention and cleanup activities; commercial and industrial facilities inspections (about 60 per year) and the review of all City issued business licenses for SB 205 compliance; implementing land development and plan review procedures including plan check, preparing Conditions of Approval, reviewing erosion control plans and WQMPs and ensuring post construction self-inspections are performed annually by required businesses; enforcing and implementing construction activities requirements of City and private development projects including construction site inspections, review of developer’s BMPs, erosion control plans and SWPPPs (Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans), and ensuring compliance with the Regional Board’s Construction General Permit requirements; maintaining City facilities, including the City Corporate and Water Yards and Fire Station, and storm drains and performing inspections and 1029
maintenance, removing trash and debris from the storm drain system, and from roads through street sweeping; and implementing public education and outreach programs by providing brochures to the public at City events and at the public counter, to businesses and contractors through inspections and storm water training of municipal staff.

The NPDES program costs the City about $300,000 annually to manage the current NPDES Permit. The new 2025 NPDES Permit will cost more due to its new requirements. One way to generate revenue for the program would be to reinstate a “grandfathered” assessment from 1994, called the County Service Area (CSA) 152 NPDES assessment. This stormwater assessment is currently collected by the County on behalf of a number of participating cities via property tax bills. The County administers and manages the CSA 152 program funds pursuant to CSA 152 Administrative Services Agreements with the participating cities. The County last collected the assessment in the City in 1994 at a rate of $4.72/BAU/year. A BAU is a “benefit assessment unit” as defined by the County. When the assessment is resumed, an owner of a single-family home in the City will pay 1 BAU/year, amounting to $4.72/year.

Since the rate was adopted in 1994 prior to the passage of Proposition 218, any increase in the rate would require a Proposition 218 Hearing and vote through an assessment balloting proceeding. In essence, the stormwater assessment is “grandfathered in” as an allowable assessment prior to Proposition 218 so long as the rate is not increased.
2025 CSA 152 Administrative Services Agreement
Public Works Department, Engineering Division, staff met with the Riverside County Economic Development Office and the City Attorney’s Office several times over the past year to gather information and determine if the City or County had ever withdrawn from the CSA 152 Administrative Services Agreement with the County. After researching this, it appears neither the City nor County ever withdrew from the CSA 152 Agreement and by approving the 2025 CSA 152 Agreement, the City would authorize the County to resume collecting the assessment starting in FY 2025/2026.

The County updates the CSA 152 Administrative Services Agreement every 9 years or so, and the attached CSA 152 Agreement is the 2025 version that all participating agencies will execute. The term on the Agreement is for five years, with two (2) two year renewal options allowed, for a total of nine (9) years. Either party may withdraw with 30 days of advance notice given to the other party. The Agreement establishes the responsibilities and obligations of each Party concerning the management and financing of CSA 152. The County collects the stormwater assessment on behalf of the City and then reimburses the City actual expenditures incurred from implementing the NPDES Permit each fiscal year. The County will deduct the 6% Administration Fee charge from the apportionment/assessment collected.

Background on CSA 152 NPDES Assessment
LAFCO annexed the City of Banning into County Service Area 152 when the County of Riverside adopted Resolution No. 93-454 (Attachment 2) on December 21, 1993, at the City’s request, in order to have the County place an assessment on property owner’s tax bills to fund expenditures required by the NPDES Permit. On March 22, 1994, City Council Resolution No. 1994-028 (Attachment 3) was adopted to fund the City’s NPDES program, whereby the annual assessment rate for FY 1994/1995 for CSA 152 was set at $4.72 per Benefit Assessment Unit.

On September 27, 1994 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1994-107, approving the Administrative Services Agreement for the CSA 152 Program between the City of Banning and Riverside County, shown as Attachment 4. The County had formed CSA 152 to finance portions of its programs and obligations associated with its Municipal NPDES Permit. The Agreement sets forth the responsibilities of the County and City with respect to the assessment. It provides for the City to annually approve a budget and report its activities in connection with its NPDES costs to the City. In addition, the City is responsible for updating parcel information for properties in the City. The County incorporates the City’s budget and the budgets of other participating cities into the County’s CSA 152 budget, holds an annual hearing, approves the assessments, and submits the assessments for collection on the Tax Roll. The County collects an Administrative Fee of 6% of the revenues collected for this work. Both County and City staff 1030
performed research, and no records were found showing either party has ever withdrawn from this Agreement. Numerous other cities also joined CSA 152 to ensure funding of their NPDES program.

The CSA 152 Agreement (used by all member agencies) with the County of Riverside was recently updated by the County and was given to staff in mid-November of 2024 for staff and City Attorney’s Office review. There are no significant changes; their Administration Fee for managing the assessment funds for the cities will remain at 6% of the revenues collected. Once the City executes this Agreement, the County will present it, along with the other member cities’ signed Agreements, to the County Board of Supervisors for execution.

On September 24, 2024, a workshop was presented by the Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer and the City Council directed staff to pursue reinstating the CSA 152 assessment. On December 10, 2024 the City Council approved Resolution No. 2024-197 awarding a consultant contract to Webb Municipal Finance, LLC for municipal assessments services to reinstate the CSA 152 stormwater assessment for FY 2025/2026. The City Council will be asked to approve the NPDES budget and current BAU rate of $4.72/BAU for FY 2025/2026 in the Spring of 2025. The City would need to provide the County with the list of Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) to place on the FY 2025/2026 Tax Roll by mid-May of 2025. Cities must provide updates/additional parcels from new developments annually to the County.

JUSTIFICATION:

The upcoming 2025 NPDES Permit will become effective in late 2025 and it has new and enhanced requirements that will significantly impact the City financially, as additional computer software, trash capture devices, consultant costs and City staff time will be needed. The execution of the 2025 CSA 152 Agreement is required for the County to collect the stormwater assessments on behalf of the City.

This action does not transmit the assessment roll to the County for collection. Separate Council action will be required at that time, and at the conclusion of the preparation of the assessment roll that is currently underway, anticipated to occur in February or March 2025.

FISCAL IMPACT:

CSA 152 provides a funding mechanism for the NPDES program. Eleven cities, including Palm Springs, Rancho Mirage, and Desert Hot Springs also joined CSA 152 to ensure funding of their NPDES program.

The County has established an administration fee of 6% of the budget revenues for services to be provided under the proposed Agreement. This administration fee will be deducted from the assessment revenues collected by the County.

The re-establishment of the CSA 152 assessment will allow the City to partially offset the expenses incurred in implementing the NPDES program. The program is currently funded through the Streets Fund (Fund 100). Approval of the agreement and the fee will require less funding to be allocated from streets maintenance activities to storm water maintenance activities.

ALTERNATIVES:

If the City Council elects to not approve this Resolution, there will be no CSA 152 stormwater assessment collected. The NPDES Program would continue to be an unfunded mandate, with no revenue collected to support the program and its costs would continue to be absorbed by the Streets Fund. The new 2025 NPDES Permit has significant costs associated with it and will continue to rise over the future. The NPDES Permit must be complied with to avoid fines from Regional Board No. 7 of the State Water Resources Control Board.

BUDGETED?:

No
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT:
1031
Yes
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 2025-02, RivCo NPDES Assessment.docx

2. Exhibit A, NPDES CSA 152 2025 Agreement.docx

3. Att. 2 - County Reso. No. 93-454, formation of CSA 152, 12.21.93.pdf

4. Att. 3 - CC Reso. No. 1994-028, approving initial CSA 152 rates, 3.22.94.pdf

5. Att. 4 - CC Reso. No. 1994-107, approving CSA 152 Agree.pdf 1032

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Robert Fisher, Acting City Manager
PREPARED BY: David Newell, Community Development Director MEETING DATE: March 25, 2025
SUBJECT: Update and Direction on General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) for Focused General Plan Update
RECOMMENDATION:

Discuss and provide direction to staff.

BACKGROUND:

The GPAC was originally appointed at the July 12, 2022 City Council meeting and established to provide input on the City's focused update of the Land Use and Circulation Elements of the 2006 General Plan.

The body consists of ten members:

Two members of the City Council
Two members of the Planning Commission
Two members of the Banning Chamber of Commerce (one board member and one non-board member)
One representative from the Riverside Chapter of the Building Industry Association (BIA) Two long-time and permanent residents of the Banning community, that are not members of any of the groups referenced above.

Based on the above, the following are the current appointees:

Type:

Appointed
Individuals:
(2) City Councilmembers
Sheri Flynn
Richard Royce
(2) Planning
Commissioners
Chris Castorena
Richard Krick
(2) Chamber of
Commerce
Laura Leindecker
Robert Sibole
(1) Building Industry
Association
Matt Jordan/Jason Holt
(Alt.)
Mike Taylor
(2) Residents
Frank Diaz
Vacant (previously Cindy
Barrington)
Attached is the application previously used to solicit applicants to serve on the GPAC. 1033
JUSTIFICATION:

On March 11, 2025, a Councilmember directed staff to provide an update on the GPAC and directed that a resident from each district be appointed to serve on the Committee. The Council may direct that staff open an application period for serving on the GPAC and return to Council for appointment.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Dependent on direction provided by City Council.

ALTERNATIVES:

Discuss and provide direction to staff.

BUDGETED?:

No
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT:

No
ATTACHMENTS:

1. CC Report on GPAC 7-12-2022

2. Application for GPAC_2021
1034

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Douglas Schulze, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Adam B. Rush, Community Development Director MEETING DATE: July 12, 2022
SUBJECT: Making Appointments to the City’ s General Plan Advisory Committee ( GPAC) to Participate in the City’ s Update to the Land Use and Circulation Elements of the General Plan
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council make appointments to the General Plan Advisory Committee ( GPAC).

BACKGROUND:

The GPAC is established to provide community- based support and oversight associated with the 2021 City of Banning Focused General Plan Update. This focused update will realign the City’s Land Use and Circulation Elements to incorporate 15-years of changes to the landscape of Banning. The GPAC will primarily focus be to review and analyze the staff proposed land use/zoning updates in the context of their stakeholder’ s perspective.

Upon completion of the GPAC’ s review and critique, City staff will bring forth a series of changes to the City’s Land Use Designations and Roadway alignments necessary to accommodate existing and future growth. In addition to the proposed changes, City staff will also prepare the appropriate CEQA-level environmental documents. In addition, California state law requires that a jurisdiction must update their Safety Element when two or more required General Plan Elements are also updated. As such, the Safety Element will be drafted and updated solely by City staff as to maximum the limited budget allocated for the two aforementioned elements.

Furthermore, the GPAC will supplement the community input provided through a series of workshops and public study sessions anticipated by City staff. These workshops will hold at regular intervals and during dates and times convenient to the public in order to maximize participation throughout the General Plan Update. Members of the Committee are expected to provide feedback and direction to the project consultant and City staff, with the goal of developing policies and objectives that enhance the goals and vision for the next generation.
8 1035
Staff Report: Appointments to the General Plan Advisory Committee July 12, 2022

Based upon public input, and as considered by the GPAC, City staff will refine the approach taken for each major step in the process, provide feedback through interim steps, review reports, and review policy alternatives to select preferred policies. City staff intends for the Committee to provide guidance at key project milestones, communicate information about the General Plan Update to Banning community members and to encourage all interested parties to participate in the process. The Committee will conclude its obligation by submitting a recommendation to the Planning Commission and the City Council on the adoption of the Focused General Plan Update.

JUSTIFICATION:

A General Plan Update, even in a limited form such as this particular update, requires and uses public input to vet critical decisions on the staff proposed document. The Committee’ s input covers a wide spectrum of issues, such land use densities, housing stock and type of housing, and strives to balance the interests of a broad-based constituency with the intention of City staff, Commission, and Council on an update that can be in effect for a generation or more.

The ten-member committee will meet on a monthly- basis at minimum, throughout the General Plan Update process, which is anticipated to last between 5 and 6 months. All meetings of the committee are open to the public. Meeting times and agendas may be viewed on the meetings and agendas page for the GPAC, located on the City’s Planning Division webpage.

Staff recommends the following distribution of members; however, the Council retains the ultimate authority to amend as desired:

Two members of the City Council
Two members of the Planning Commission
Two members of the Banning Chamber of Commerce ( one board member and one non-board member)
One representative from the Riverside Chapter of the Building Industry Association BIA)
Two long-time and permanent residents of the Banning community, that are not members of any of the groups referenced above.

Staff recommendation for GPAC membership is detail within Attachment 1, which is attached herein.

FISCAL IMPACT:

City staff will manage, moderate, and provide support services to the GPAC. These items have been budgeted for within the General Plan Update which is being funded through the Local Early Action Planning ( LEAP) grant, provided by the Department of Housing and Community Development ( HCD).
9 1036
Staff Report: Appointments to the General Plan Advisory Committee July 12, 2022

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Appoint members to the General Plan Advisory Committee.

2. Choose to continue this item to a future meeting.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Staff Recommendations
https://banningca. gov/DocumentCenter/ View/10927/Att-1-Staff-Recommendations

2. Presentation
https://banningca. gov/DocumentCenter/ View/10928/Att-2-Presentation Approved by:

Douglas Schulze
City Manager
10 1037

APPLICATION TO SERVE ON THE

GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Name:

Email Address:

Address:

Telephone Numbers: Home Cell
If employed, where do you work and what is your position? Choose the category that best fits the organization you represent or are affiliated with:

Banning Resident Planning Commission Banning Chamber of Commerce Building Industry Association (Riverside Chapter) Commercial Real Estate Development Association (NAIOP)
Length of residence in Banning
Are you a registered voter in Banning? Yes__________ No Information requested below will be used by the City Council as a screening process to determine which applicants hold the minimum requirements for GPAC participation.

1. Provide a brief outline, summarizing your organization and the primary duties and responsibilities of the organization.
1038

2. Provide a brief outline of your position within the organization referenced above, and please include the following: education, work experience, civic involvement and other background relevant to duties of the position you seek:

3. Provide a brief justification as to how the City will benefit from your participation in the GPAC.
1039

4. Identify specific problems facing the GPAC and explain how you feel they might be resolved:

5. What types of major issues should be under the purvey of the GPAC? 1040

FOR BANNING RESIDENTS ONLY:

6. Provide a Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement, and other background relevant to duties of the position you seek:

Thank you for your willingness to serve your local government.

Date: Signed: ______________________
1041

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Robert Fisher, Acting City Manager
PREPARED BY: Robert Fisher, Acting City Manager
MEETING DATE: March 25, 2025
SUBJECT: Consideration the evaluation of current City of Banning Planning Commissioners pursuant to Banning Municipal Code Section 2.28.020( C ) and Section 6.4 ( C ) of the Manual of Procedural Guidelines for the Conduct of City Council and Constituent Body/Commission Meetings for the City of Banning.

RECOMMENDATION:

At the request of the Banning City Council this item is being brought to the full City Council for the consideration and evaluation of all current City of Banning Planning Commissioners pursuant to the Banning Municipal Code (BMC) Section 2.28.020( C ) and under Section 6.4 ( C ) of the Manual of Procedural Guidelines for the Conduct of City Council and Commission meetings.

BACKGROUND:

City of Banning Planning Commissioners are appointed to the Planning Commission and serve a term of 4 years.

JUSTIFICATION:

The BMC Section 2.28.020 ( C ) reads: “Members of the Planning Commission shall serve at the pleasure of the council and may be removed at any time by a majority vote of the entire council”. The Code of Conduct for council and commission meetings under Section 6.4 ( C ) reads in part: “ Absent any other provision to the contrary, members of any non-City organization, or City Committees, boards or commissions may be removed by the council without cause by a majority vote of the whole Council body.

Any member of the City Council may place the question of such removal on the agenda”.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Retain the services of each Commissioner.

2. Remove a commissioner with a majority vote of the entire council per the BMC Section 2.28.020 BUDGETED?:

No
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT:

No
ATTACHMENTS:
1042

1. Manual of Procedural Guidelines 6.4.pdf

2. Banning Municipal Code Section 2.28.02 ( C ).pdf
1043
1044
1045
1046

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Robert Fisher, Acting City Manager
PREPARED BY: Nate Smith, Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer Art Vela, Director of Public Works
MEETING DATE: March 25, 2025
SUBJECT: Update of the City of Banning Program to Update Internally Illuminated Street Name Signs at Traffic Signals Citywide
RECOMMENDATION:

Provide feedback to Public Works Staff on the proposed update program detailed below.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Banning has 18 traffic signals within the City’s roadway system. 8 of the traffic signals along Highland Springs Avenue are co-owned by the City of Beaumont, and a maintenance agreement exists between the cities of Banning and Beaumont for Beaumont to maintain those traffic signals.

Each traffic signal contains street name signage as reference to drivers. All but 1 traffic signal utilizes internally illuminated street name signs (IISNS), with Ramsey Street and Highland Springs Avenue being the 1 signal without a IISNS.

A request from City Council was made to update the signage on the IISNS’s to help with beautification efforts, as many of the signs are significantly dated, worn, or missing. There are several intersections where the IISNS is missing and requires full replacement. Public Works staff completed an inventory of the IISNS city wide, and requested quotes from the City’s contracted traffic signal maintenance contractor to replace street name placards where the existing are worn, and replace missing IISNS with LED backlight flat panel signs, which is consistent with the current City of Banning standards for new traffic signal installations.

The cost to replace one (1) street name placard is approximately $250, and at a 4-way intersection there are a total of eight (8) placards, 2 in each double faced IISNS. Installation is approximately $1,000 per intersection. In total, a full placard replacement is expected to cost approximately $3,000 for a full intersection. The replacement cost for a missing IISNS with the LED backlit flat panel is approximately $4,300 each, installed. All costs identified are approximate, and based on quotes received in February 2025, and subject to change depending on installation date.

Proposed City Program:

The Public Works Department is proposing the following program to replace missing IISNS and updating aged placards, by a list of priorities.

Priority 1: Replace Missing IISNS, providing at least 2 IISNS at each intersection. Approx. $8,600 to be completed in FY 24/25.
1047
Install 2 (of 4) new IISNS at the intersection of Ramsey Street/4th Street $8,600 Priority 2: Replace Placards, beginning with oldest/most aged. Approx. $23,000. Expend $6,000 in FY 24/25 and remaining in FY 25/26.

Install (8) Panels – Ramsey Street/Sunset Avenue$3,000
Install (8) Panels – Ramsey Street/8th Street $3,000
Install (8) Panels – Ramsey Street/22nd Street $3,000
Install (6) Panels – Ramsey Street/San Gorgonio Avenue $2,500 Install (6) Panels – Ramsey Street/Hargrave Avenue$2,500 Install (4) Panels – Wilson Street/Mountain Avenue $2,000 Install (4) Panels – Highland Springs Avenue/Sun Lakes Boulevard $2,000 Install (4) Panels – Highland Springs Avenue/Sun Lakes Village Drive $2,000 Install (2) Panels – Ramsey Street/4th Street (NEC) $1,500 Install (2) Panels – Highland Springs Avenue/Wilson Street $1,500 Priority 3: Replace Remaining Missing IISNS. Approx. $25,800. Budget and expend in FY 25/26 and FY 26/27.

Install remaining 2 new IISNS at Ramsey Street/4th Street $8,600 Install 1 new IISNS at Ramsey Street/Hargrave Street $4,300 Install 1 new IISNS at Ramsey Street/San Gorgonio Avenue $4,300 Install 1 new IISNS at Ramsey Street/8th Street $4,300
Install 1 new IISNS at Wilson Street/Mountain Avenue $4,300 Priority 4: Update Non-Illuminated to IISNS
Highland Springs Avenue/Ramsey Street: This intersection required new electrical cabling where none exists today, and potential upgrades to signal hardware/control box/electrical pedestal. This will be a project coordinated and cost shared with City of Beaumont. Cost is unknown, and proposed as a capital expenditure in FY 26/27.

Priority 5: Update Fluorescent IISNS with LED IISNS.

Approximately $115,000. Cost to be implemented starting in FY 27/28 and split over a 5-year period, at costs of approximately $23,000 annually, not adjusted for inflation (based on February 2024 quote).

JUSTIFICATION:

This proposal is to address City Council direction in increasing visibility and updating signage to be more attractive..

FISCAL IMPACT:

No direct fiscal impact. This action is seeking direction from City Council on the priority list. Future allocations will be presented in annual budgeting documents.

ALTERNATIVES:

Not Applicable
BUDGETED?:

No
1048
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT:

No
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Att. 1 - Traffic Signal Map.pdf

2. Att. 2 - IISNS Inventory.pdf
1049
1050

ISNS LIST
Missing IISNS
• (3) LED IISNS – Ramsey/4th
• (1) LED IISNS – Ramsey/Hargrave
• (1) LED IISNS – Ramsey/San Gorgonio
• (1) LED IISNS – Ramsey/8th
• (1) LED IISNS – Mountain/Wilson
Placard Update
• (8) Panels – Ramsey/Sunset
• (8) Panels – Ramsey/8th
• (8) Panels – Ramsey/22nd
• (6) Panels – Ramsey/San Gorgonio
• (6) Panels – Ramsey/Hargrave
• (4) Panels – Wilson/Mountain
• (4) Panels – Highland Springs/Sun Lakes Boulevard
• (4) Panels – Highland Springs/Sun Lakes Village Drive • (2) Panels – Ramsey/4th (NEC)
• (2) Panels – Highland Springs/Wilson
Intersection Update, non-illuminated to IISNS
• (2) LED IISNS – Highland Springs/Ramsey
1051

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Robert Fisher, Acting City Manager
PREPARED BY: Art Vela, Public Works Director
MEETING DATE: March 25, 2025
SUBJECT: Discuss City Vehicle Smogs
RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and File
BACKGROUND:

This item is presented to City Council at the request of Mayor Pro Tem Richard Royce.

The City's fleet is maintained by the City's in house Fleet Division of the Department of Public Works.

The Fleet Division often times must rely on outside vendors to provide services, such as vehicle smog inspections. The City currently uses Fast Lube and Tune in Beaumont due to their competitive pricing ($49/smog), professional and responsive staff and quick service. On average the City spends just over $1,000 per year for smog inspections.

While the City supports local businesses in Banning, often times local businesses do not want to (or cannot) meet the City's insurance requirements resulting in the City having to go outside of the City limits. Staff plans to reach back out to local businesses for their interest in providing needed services.

JUSTIFICATION:

N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:

N/A
ALTERNATIVES:

N/A
BUDGETED?:

No
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT:

No
1052

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Robert Fisher, Acting City Manager
PREPARED BY: Art Vela, Public Works Director
Ralph Wright, Parks and Recreation Director
MEETING DATE: March 25, 2025
SUBJECT: Discuss the City's Tree Trimming Practices and Resolution 1977-15 RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file.

BACKGROUND:

This item is presented to City Council at the request of Mayor Sheri Flynn.

The Department of Public Works is responsible for landscape maintenance including the trimming of trees along center road medians as well as around City building facilities. While form tree trimming program or schedule is not in place, tree trimming is provided on an as needed basis identified through visual inspections. Tree trimming is performed by both in-house staff and contractors. Contractor are relied upon for larger, complicated jobs that require special equipment and training. Contractor's are also utilized to maintain landscaping along the Ramsye Street median from Highland Springs Avenue to Highland Home Road. Trees maintained by the Department of Public Works have been inventoried and mapped.

It should be noted that private property owners are responsible to maintain landscaping fronting their parcels and within the public right-of-way, see Resolution 1977-15 attached hereto. At times City staff may trim shrubs or trees within the public right-of-way when a safety hazard exist or to avoid damage to public property. The City does not have the staff and financial resources to maintain all landscaping with the public right-of-ways.

The Parks and Recreation Department does not currently have a formal tree trimming schedule or tree maintenance plan. The trees within the Banning Park system have for years been significantly undermaintained and to remedy this, the department is currently in the development of a formal tree maintenance plan and will have it completed in 2025. In 2023, the department had a system wide tree inventory completed that mapped all of the trees in our parks, categorized them by species, evaluated their health status, estimated asset values, and provided recommendations for general maintenance or if necessary, removal.

With the current staffing levels, tree trimming by in-house staff is limited to emergency limb removals for public safety and the Park’s landscape maintenance contractor skirts trees to a minimum 6’ level as needed.

JUSTIFICATION:

N/A
1053
FISCAL IMPACT:

It is estimated that to properly maintain all of its trees, the annual tree maintenance costs for general maintenance would be above $100,000 for the Parks and Recreation Department and above $100,000 for the Department of Public Works.

The Parks and Recreation Department tree trimming budget has been slowly increasing from $12,500 in FY 2022 to $29, 210 in FY 2025 and the department currently attempts to contract for crown cleaning and crown trimming of our large trees to remove the dead wood and thin the mature trees to mitigate the wind effect and safety in our parks.

The Street Maintenance Division of Department of Public Works has an annual budget of $25,000 while the Building and Maintenance Division of Department of Public Works has an annual budget of $10,000.

ALTERNATIVES:

N/A
BUDGETED?:

No
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT:

No
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Landscape Maintenance right of way Flier.pdf

2. Landscape Maintenance Reso 1977-15.pdf
1054
www.banningca.gov
DID YOU KNOW? Waste Management
Disposal Company offers free pick-up
of bulky, unwanted items – such as
couches, mattresses, and trash – up to
three times a year. It’s easy! Just call

1.800.423.9986, arrange the date and
then leave the items on your curb on the
scheduled day.

The City of Banning is
asking residents to do
their part to keep
Banning beautiful,
including proper
care and
maintenance
of trees.

For more information,
visit www.banningca.gov
or call us at 951.922.3130.

Code regulations have been in
place for years. City of Banning
Code Enforcement Officers
regularly check the City’s
neighborhoods and streets to
ensure residents are following
the law, including:

Put your trash, recycling and
yard waste bins away by
10:00 p.m. the same day of pick
up. BMC 8.28.190
Keep your yard, driveway,
sidewalks, curbs, free of
garbage or large bulky items
such as furniture, tires,
appliances, and similar items.

BMC 8.48.210(H)
Place inoperative, hobby,
dismantled vehicles in an
enclosed building during
re-construction or repair of
vehicle/s. BMC 8.48.210(H)
Fix broken windows, doors,
gates, fences, and damaged
areas on and around
your home. BMC 8.48.250
Park vehicles only on concrete
or asphalt pavement and only
on the designated driveway
area/s. BMC 17.28.030(G)
For more information, including a list of approved
trees and how to apply for the rebate, visit
www.banningca.gov/300/Residential-Programs
or call 951.922.3260
Help us keep Banning beautiful by
reporting what you see – or don’t see – in the
community. Let us know if you see public
property that needs repair or is missing,
traffic or street name signs that need to be
replaced, or hazards on sidewalks or streets.

Contact us at [email protected]
or 951-922-3130.

SHADE TREE REBATE

PROGRAM
The City of Banning offers residential customers a
shade tree rebate of up to $50 per tree for the purchase of up to five qualifying trees. In most cases, the trees must be planted within 10-35 feet of the foundation
of your home, not on City property or located under
utility lines. However, if you are required to replace a tree in the public right-of-way next to your property,
the City of Banning may honor the rebate program.

Pre-approval by the Public Works and Banning
Electric Utility (BEU) is required.

DON’T LET IT GO
LET US KNOW!
1055
LEARN THE ABC’S OF
CARING FOR YOUR TREES!
Before you remove a tree, call the City of Banning
at 951.922.3130 to make sure you are meeting code
regulations. Generally, the City discourages the
removal of trees that are healthy, provide shade
and add beauty to the area. A tree removal and
replacement plan is required to protect public
health and safety.

Residents are responsible for maintaining the
landscaping including trees within the public right
of way next to their property.

Trees, weeds or plants that hang over sidewalks,
curbs or alleys need to be kept trimmed. Dead or
diseased trees should be removed immediately.

Check city
codes.

Adjacent
property is your
responsibility.

Be safe, be
courteous.

Follow the guidelines below when
maintaining trees on your property:

WHO IS RESPONSIBLE?

PROPERTY OWNERS ARE

RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING

THE FOLLOWING AREAS

A LITTLE BIT

OF HISTORY
INSPIRE BANNING – WITH CLEANER TREES AND LESS DEBRIS!
Looking for more details? Visit www.banningca.gov or call 951.922.3130.

THE CITY OF BANNING PUBLIC WORKS

DEPARTMENT CAN PERMIT THE REMOVAL
OF TREES FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:

DID YOU KNOW? The City of
Banning’s policy for landscape
maintenance in the public right-of-way
was adopted in 1977. At times, City crews
will remove trees that pose a public health
and safety hazard.

Diseased
Fire hazard
Roots that damage
sidewalks, curbs
and gutters
Not in conformity
with adopted
specifications
In order to permit
street widening
Interference or
damage with sewer
or water lines
Located in a
proposed driveway
or entrances to
private property
The plant area between the concrete curb
and concrete sidewalk.

The plant area between the concrete
sidewalk and the property line.

The plant area between the curb and the
property line.

The unimproved area between the edge of
the pavement and the property line.

Note: Trees cannot
be removed
without a
replacement
plan.

PROPERTY OWNER
Ensuring public right-of-way areas, like curbs,
sidewalks and alleys, are safe, unaltered, and
do not interfere with public convenience.

Keeping right-of-way areas clear of
obstructions, including overgrown trees,
plants or weeds, garbage, rocks, bulky
items like furniture or tires, and
non-permitted alterations.
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061