Banning City Council
August 26, 2025

Ill Parameter Criteria Notes
4 5
3 Panel- to-Panel
Communications
Fiber Testing
Ethernet Protocol
Existing Fiber
Communications
Wireless
rack-mouinted Modbus TCP cards that are
compatible with the furnished PLC.

All PLC panels and network hardware will
communicate via ethernet. Any existing network
protocols that are not ethernet will need to be
converted .

All new panel ethernet switches will have a
minimum of 8 ports and be listed as Managed and
Layer 2 by the manufacturer.

The DBE will coordinate testing of all existing fiber
runs for connectivity. Any ftber runs that are not
operational will need to be repa~ edlreelaced.

Any network devices in the SCADA network that are
not communicating through Ethernet will need to be
converted to Ethernet protocol.

This includes any vendor package controllers that
need to communicate with the SCADA system .

Develop and implement a network segmentation
plan that uses firewalls and VLAN segmentation to
segregate network traffic.

The DBE will coordinate testing of all existing fiber
runs for connectivity. Any fiber runs that are not
operational will need to be repaired/ replaced.

All Wi-Fi connections shall be disabled, unless
absolutely required. If so , specific Wi- Fi connections must be secured, monitored, and logged.

CYBERSECURITY CONSIDERATIONS
2 4
5 Accessibility
SCADA Login and
Passwords
Default Passwords
Corporate LAN
Cybersecurity
Design Criteria R11pott
The Wonderware ( Aveva) Server and Historian
log files should be accessib le from the SCADA
Workstation. The SCADA system shan be
accessible remotely by SCADA operations staff.

Require user specific operator login credentials for
access at all computerized host access points with a
minimum of seven ( 7) opera tor groups.

Prescribed automatic logout functiona lity (i.e.
logout upon 300 seconds of inac tivity).

Login credentiats to be managed in a similar way to
the City of Banning 's existing IT system login
credential. Remote logins will be required to include
two--factor authentication to anow access.

Delete all default login credentia ls, and store
passwords in a secure location once
commissioning is completed.

There shall be no direct interface between the Plant
SCADA network and the Corporate LAN .

Secure transfer of data between the SCADA system
and Corporate LAN shall be managed by City of
Banning and shall not be compromised when the
DBE is integrating asset reg ister data or SCADA
screens at the SCADA system.

A segmented Demilitarized Zone ( DMZ) shall be
provided that blocks and restricts traffic from/ to
SCADA LAN and Corporate LAN.

Utilize industry best practice and design in
City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Wa ter Upgrades Control capabi lities
for remote access
shall be agreed upon
between DBE and
City of Banning.

Pae-95
1076
1111
6 Parameter j Criteria Notes
Design
Cybersecurity
Workshops
SCADA
Workshops
accordance with ISA/IEC• 62443 Industrial Network
and System Security standards.

Implement a defense in-depth approach to
cybersecurity.

Implement a zero-trust design.

Provide system operator notification indicating
system and device status, wtth controls that pennil
manual and automatic blocking of networ1< access
points and ethernet switch ports.

The full extent of the cybersecurity requ irements will need lo be discussed dUring workshops that include
the Cify of Banning , its representalives , and the DBE.

There will be a minimum of six ( 6) workshops with a
minimum allotted time of (20) hours. This time can be
allotted in any manner agreeable to both City of
Banning and the DBE.

Design decisions shall include input and final
direction given by City of Banning and its
repre sentatives.

Four ( 4) training sessions ( 4-hours each).

Two ( 2) workshops for each group of Cify of
Banning.

Training on controls, alarm settings, modifying
settings , etc.

These workshops
are for discussing
cybersecurity
implementation
options and for
deciding on the final
security design
requirements for the
WWTP.

In addition to
functional testing
and 1/0
verifications

SCADA MIGRATION

6.8.5.1 DBE shall prepare a SCADA Migration Plan that
outlines the steps that wm be taken to install new
hardware and software as well as complete upgrades
to existing equipment and software while maintaining
operations at the WWTP.

SCADA Migralion Plan shall list any required
shutdowns ( quantity , timing, duration, systems
SCADA Migration affected, etc.). Any shutdowns shall be in accordance with overall project shutdown aKowances.

DBE shall submit Draft SCADA Migration Plan to
City of Banning for review. DBE shall hold one ( 1) 4-
hour workshop with City of Banning and incorporate
any comments into updated $ CADA Migration Plan.

DBE shaU submit Final SCADA Migration Plan lo C~y
of Banning for review and approval.

Design Deliverables
The l&C design deliverables will provide the framework for the system integrator to develop the PLC programs and configure the HMI system. While the PLC panels, PLC programming , and HMI configuration shall be furnished by the system integrator, the DBE shall be res ponsible for providing the necessary design deliverables to guide the programming and panel construction .

Details about the des ign deliverables and programming guidelines are described in the ta~es below . Any specifications below can be modified with approval from the City of Banning .

OesignCnteria Repon
Crty ol Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recyded Water Upgrades Paga 96 Table 83 Design Deliverables
@4ii•::@IP Criteria
List of all hard-wired 1/0 at each PLC panel
1/0 List ( including any remote 1/0), including 1/0 channel mapping
2 Register Map
List of all signals to be communicated between
PLCs, including reg ister address mapping
List of every alarm and shutdown condilJon that will
3 Alarm List
require operator attention. Include any automatic
actions or required operator actions for alarm
conditions.

Create document to describe VV'NTP process in detail, A draft control beginning with the automated process to be narrative, which is programmed in the PLCs and including any operator included in Section monitoring or control actions. This document should 6 7 1 of this OCR has be organized to describe each PLC' s individual control b;,.;n prepared by t::~~~~ ~~ ~~:~pI~~~ ~~,;~: !!. t~:O~!, ~ ity of Ban~ing to process conditions at the plant should also be kick start thts effort.

Process Control detailed.
4 Narratives A cybersecurity control narrative shall be developed that includes all server instances, workstation
instances, and detailed network functional
descriptions.

DBE shall conduct a preliminary workshop to
validate the scope and a minimum of two (2)
workshop before finalizing the Process Control
Narrative, each workshop shall be 2-4 hours in
duration.

Develop list of HMI screens for the system
5 HMI Screens List integrator to build.

List of aff network devices , physical locations, IP
6 Network List addresses, VLAN configurations, and gateway information.
7 Equipment List
Lisi of au hardware, physical locations, manufacturer
information, model numbers, etc.

Table 84 PLC Programming Specifications
Item Parameter Cntena
2 3
Programming
Upgraded PLCs
PLC Programming
Standards
Vendor Package
Systems
Design Cnleria Report
For each PLC program that is replacing an existing
PLC , program scope should encompass all 110
mapping, controts, alarms, and logic from the
existing PLC. This program scope should be clearly
defined in the control narratives description for that
PLC.

Ensure PLC programming practices in accordance
wtth IEC 61131- 3 and comply with City of Banning
SCADA standards
Vendor PLCs shall be the same type as the rest of
the site.

Vendor PLCs shall have processor program and
vital configuration information backed up in a similar
manner to the other site PLCs.

City of Banning Wutewater Treatment Plant and Recycied Waler Upgrades Verify with City
of Banning
Operations
Notes

1077
IIIIM4ifi::iJMP
4 Program
Modifications
Criteria
A copy of the latest PLC program shall be saved to
the SCADA Workstation and backed up to the
Servers. Studio5000 shall be installed at the SCADA
Workstation to allow program modifications as
needed.

Latest version of Aveva (WonderWare) software , 1
developer license, 2 thick clients , and a pair of RDS
thin clients.

Table 85 HM/ Configuration
11111+;;;;,,;;;; p
HMI Screens List
Vendor
2 Package
Systems
3 Navigation/ Alarm
Pane
Hard-wired
4 Signal
Monitoring
Screen
5 Disp lay
Hierarchy
6 Alarm Hierarchy
Alarms
Design Criteria Report
Cntena
HMI Screens list will include existing Wonderware
Aveva} screens that the plant operators require
for the local $CADA and any screens or process
information from existing panel-mounted HMls or
other packaged systems that have not been
Incorporated into the existing Wonderware
screens.

The system integrator shall incorporate all the
necessary vendor data in the final SCADA screens.

Include a header or footer screen that is sized and
configured to always be displayed with any process
screen. Th~ screen will contain navigation links, an
alarm banner, and critical process information to the
operator at all times.

All hard-wired analog and discrete inputs to the
PLC will be displayed on the SCADA screens.

Real-time and historical trending for all analog inputs and run statuses to the PLC will be available from the
HMI screens.

Displays will be arranged using a hierarchy:

Show only information that needs to be
immediately available for operations (system
overview).

Poke points for more details on a particular
process or piece of equipment.

Further poke points for control stations for devices
such as pumps and valves , etc.

A hierarchy of alarms shall be specified , which
will be adjustable by the operators .

Each alarm shall be class ified with a
corresponding value representing criticality. The
system will present the alanns in different ways
based on the crtticality, per City of Banning
SCADA standards.

All alarm functions will be carried out at the PLC
level.

All alarms will display on a common alarm
screen.

All alarms must be acknowledged by the Plant
operating staff before they can be cleared.

Some alarms may be cleared from SCADA. Others
will need local reset. Philosophy shall be based on
safety and equipment protection.

No alarm will clear automatically until it has been
Crty of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recyded Water Upgrades Notes
Review with City of
banning Operatkms to
ensure all monKoring
and control data
points are accessible
from the SCADA
Workstation and all
SCADA Tablets.

PageH
III-M4ifi::iiliP
8 9
Proportional,
Integral,
Derivative ( PID)
Control
Standards
Criteria
properly acknowledged.

PID contro l functions will be performed at the PLC
with controHer faceplate displays at the worf<station .

Standard PID control operator interface will be
provided , including AUTO/ MANUAL mode selection:

In AUTO, the controUer output will be based on
the PID control function at the PLC.

In MANUAL, the output of the controller will be
based on an operator set value.

Transfer between MANUAL and AUTO will be
pumpless.

At the workstation , DBE will provtde
AUTO/ MANUAL selection poke points for PID
controlled equipment, with grap hic loading
displays for manual control.

PIO loop tuning parameters shaft be available via
SCADA but will require engineering login to make
adjustments.

New HMI screens shall be developed following City of
Banning SCADA standards.

Notes
The following table includes some of the typical 1/0 signals that shall be monitored and use d to control equipment or systems by SCADA.

Tab le 86 Typical Monitoring and Control
Item Parameter Monotonng & Control Signals
All Analog
Transmitters
2 Level Transmitters
3 Level Switches
4 Flow Transmitters
5 Flow Switches
6 Pressure
Transmitters
Analyzers
7 ( pH/LEUH2S/ CL2/
DO etc.)
8 Temperature
Transmitters
9 Temperature
Switches
10 Open/ Close
Valve or Gate
11 Modulating Flow
Control Va lve
12 Constant Speed
Drive
Design Criteria Report
Transmitter Fail Alarm
Continuous level monitoring
PLC calculated high/ low level alarm
PLC calculated high-high/ low-low level alarm
high/ low level alarms
high-high/ low-low level alarms
Continuous flow monitoring PLC calcu lated flow totals
PLC calculated high/ low flow alarms
Flow alanns where app licable
Continuous pressure monitoring
PLC calculated higMow pressure alarms
Continuous signal monitoring Dry
contact high/ low level alarm
PLC calculated high-high/ low-low level alarm
Continuous temperature indication
PLC calculated high/ low tempera ture alarm
High temperature alann low temperature alann
Valve open/close command.

Valve open/close position indication Valve in Auto or
Remote indication Valve fault indication.

Valve position set point Valve position feedback.

Valve open/ close position indication if applicable.

Valve fault indication.

Drive start/stop command Drive
running indication
Drive in auto or remote indication
Drive faulted ( Ge neral Fault or Multiple Faull
Indicators, etc.)
PLC calcu lated drive run time
City ot Banring Wasiew- ater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades Notes
1078
Item Parameter
13 14
15 Table 87
Variable Speed
Drive
Chemical
Dosing/ Feed
System
SCADA
Cybersecurity
Security
I Monitoring & Control Signals
Failure to respond to command or change of status
when not commanded.

Diagnostics ( DBE to confirm specific
parameters)
VFD start/stop command VFD running indication
VFD in auto indication VFD faulted
VFD speed set point VFD speed feedback
PLC calculated VFD run time
Diagnostics (DBE to confirm specific
parameters)
Chemical Dosing/Feed Systems
Chemical volume/quantity used calculated values
Captured host intrusion and antlvirus events to be
centrally logged wtthin the SOL database located in
the DMZ with status displayed at the HMI and
alarmed on pickup of a high- level security event.

Network diagnostics and device communication
status shall be logged and displayed at the HMI.

Log network status to Historian.

System log files shall be logged to the SQL
database located in the DMZ.

Configure each HMI to log Factory Talk FT
Diagnostic data to SQL database located in the
DMZ.

Configure ethernet switches to be monitored and
status displayed at the HMI. Log status changes for
ethernet swttch and each port to Historian. On
pickup of unauthorized port access or ethemet
switch fault, display alarm at HMI. -
Parameter ' Criteria
3 4
5 Construction /
Work Area
General Design
Principles
Vulnerability
Assessment
Locking
Dual
Authentication
DeslgnCnteriaReport
Make adequate provision for the protection of the
work area against fire, theft, and vandalism, and for
the protect. on of the public against exposure to injury.

Security improvements shall integrate with existing
site security infrastructure.

Discrete security measures shall be planned into the
facility without creating a fortress- like appearance.

Site design will address security issues related to
access control; electronic protection; and the
hardening· of the site against man- made and natural
disasters .

Security measures sha ll be in line with 2008
America' s Water Infrastructure Act.

DBE will conduct a vulnerability assessment and
provide all other security measures required pursuant
to Applicable Law
All electrical panels exterior to the building structures shall be lockable
Key Fob
City of Banni-\ g Wastewater Treatment Plant and R& eyd& d Water Upgrades I Notes
Notes
Report deliverable

6.9 Miscellaneous
The following table contains the Engineering Design Guidelines for miscellaneous criteria.

Table 88 General miscellaneous requirements
s, nM0
2 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
sign Criteria Report
Parameter
Scope
Project Schedule
Design Submittals for
Crty Reviews
Permits
Site Visit, Survey,
Geophysical
Investigation, and
Potholing
Technical Specifications
Right-ofWay/ Easements
Asset Register
Landscape
Forklifts
Equipment's Needing
Backwash
Spare Parts
Equipment Utility Pads
Equipment Sole
Sourcing
O&M/
SOPs/
UPCPs
Identification Devices
Submittal Packaging
Criteria
This document applies to General/ Misc.

Primavera Version 7. 0 unless otherwise approved by the PM.

All design documents in support of establishing cost estimates and/ or GMPs.

Consider all applicable permtts. Examples include California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) permits.

Review alignments for visible utility conflicts, constructability, and ease of operations and maintenance of the facilities. Conduct geophysical investigation to determine presence of subsurface features . Perform potholing to determine depths of subsurface features.

CSI Format, "Green Book" Standard Specif!C8tions for Public Wor1<s Construction can be referenced in lieu .

Consider all applicable Right-of-Way/Easements requirements and li mitations and how they are communicated with the Contractor.

Create Asset Register and include for each new asset, size, capacity, year of construction, cost, tolerances , measured vibration, etc.

Review project landscape requirements with C~y staff.

Use electric units and propane.

Use recyded water in lieu of potable water where possible.

Eva luate spare parts requirements for an critical mechanical equipment being designed and discuss with City O& M Staff.

Provide for all equipment.

Use reinforced concrete .

Bollards are necessary to protect utilities, where applicable.

Public Contract Code§ 3400(b) allows sole sourcing under four reasons:
1 ) to conduct a field test or experiment of the product, 2) to match existing products in use on the particular public wor1<, 3) to obtain a product that is only available from one source, and 4) to respond to an emergency .

Prepare treatment facility Operations and Maintenance ( O& M) Manuals to a standardized electronic format and level of content Establishment of standardized formats and content for Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and Unit Process Control
Procedures (UPCPs)
Develop a technical specification section to require Contractor to furnish and install all identification devices as shown and specified in the Contract Documents. This would include a section for "Smart Tags" and related tag guidelines including but not limited to Piping ID, Extt Signs , Safety Signs, Right-to-know labels and tags .

Package submittals to facilitate quick reviews.

Consider a list of unique submtttal packeges required (e.g., material data, seismic calcs, testing plan, test results , Certificate of Proper Installation (COPI), warranty cert, O&M, etc.

Consider grouping submittals by facility, if multiple facilibes.

City of Banning Was\ ewater Treatmenl Plant and Recyded Water Upgrades Paga 101 1079
Clause I Parameter
17 18
Design Criteria Report
Prevent Damage to
Meta l surfaces during
Unload ing
SDTI
Criteria
Requ irements should state that submittals should be
Msubmitted and approved" prior to scheduling of shipping , testing, etc.

Contractor shall use nylon straps for handling of all stainless steel, alum inum, and coated equipment and construction elements as to not damage the finish.

WI/ I/TP shall remain in operation at all times.

The CON TRACTOR sha ll compile a detailed list of all rtem s of worl< involving tie-ins and all their work elements .

City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades Page 102 Appendix A
Conceptual Design Drawings
Oilslgn Crttena Report
City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades 1080

CITY OF BANNING , CALIFORNIA

CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR

WWTP AND RECYCLED WATER

UPGRADES PROJECT

BANNING, CALIFORNIA
JULY 2024

PREPARED BY,
CITY OF BANNING N2W ENGINEERING INC.

ARTURO VELA, P (.

PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
DATE JAMES WA"IG, P .E.

PROJECT MANAGER
DATE
K2W£ NGINfEIING, INC.

II
I ~ !
S ~ , ~
a::
c,:

I.;
I I I I I I I ~
1 11 11 Iii I !
Htttti ! ~
l!)
z t;;:i:
c,: i:;~
a,~ .
o!i
j'::g:~
u
PAOJfctNO.
105- 0002

0..
l!)
z
z
c,:
a,
OIIIG! N,l,.LSH[[ TSIZ[
ANSl-0
I
G-100
Iw
w
I .,,
I-.=
1081

GENERAL
G-100 TITLE 5,-.i[IT
G- 101 DRAWING IUOEX
C- 102 '
v CINITY . .\NO LOCATION MAP
G-10.5 SYMBOI..

S ANO A38REVIP. TIONSI
G- 104 SYMBOLS AND A38REVIATlONS II
G- 105 DESIGN CRITERIA
G-106 PROCESS now OIAGRAl.
4 G- 107 PLAN HYOR. WUC PROFILE
CIVIL
C-101 CML SffE PLAN

MECHANICAL
IJ -101 ).' ECHANICAl PL.t,

N ANO SECTION
PROCESS INSTFU. JMENTATION AND CONTROLS
100 l[Gft,,
J
101 FlNE SCREENS
102 AERAT ON TMi<
S
103 MBR " LED PUMPS
10, AERAT ON BLOWERS
1- 105 MEMB~

E BIOROC- ORS
106 MOR PERMEAT[ PUMPS
107 MBR BLO'NERS
108 MBR e>ERMfATE lANKS
109 Pu.NT AJR COMPRESSORS
110 DIGESTER
111 MEOl4. HICAI... THICKENER
112 CATIOt.tC PQ_Y).IER DOSING SYSTOI
113 CITRIC ACID ;)() SING SYSTEM
11-'I SODIUM HYPOCHLOR1TE DOS NG SYSTEM
115 CHLORINE CO\lTACT - ANKS
t ""''

32. COBCtminolle~ Suit~ lS
IMnl!, U. 92101
WWW.N2WENG.COM
i
I ~ ~
a:: < z
J .. w
s a::

Q. "
Xw0
Q. <.!)
z ~
3 z
z §: z 3 <
cl <
a, <.!) a::
0 ~-
z
0 z
z
r:: ~ z < u
a,
8 ~
a •
PROJECT NO.
105-0002
OIIIGIHALSlifET5! ZE
ANSl0
SH££ T:

G-101
l
i ';,
II
I •
iii8IIiIIII
I •
1082
G)
I
0 N
I
NORTH
6 7l
0 ~
o ~ (_
m
I
r ;
0 I
5 z
7l
HARCRA'¥£ SlR£ET
2§1
NORTH
2 ~
SOOTM HATHAWAY SlRttT
JD
j CITY OF BANNING
I
I
I 99 E. RAMSEY STREET
I----------- B- AN_ N_IN_G_, C_A_92_2_20 __________ _,
HOJ£ CT ·

BANN ING WWTP
2242 CHARLES STR EET
BAN NING, CA 92220

VICIN ITY AND LOCA TION MAP
E
PRELIMINARY 7/9/2024 4:19 PM
Fllf: C.\USUS\ IRIS JIMENCZ\ N2W £ NGIN££ RING\ NlW SERVER· S[RVtA ( l)\PAO/( CTS\ 105- 0TY Of IIANNING\ 105- 000l OWNER . t.DVISOII; W& WWTF'\ 6. PROJECT ENGINEERING AND DE51GN\ 06 Ol] REUMINAAV ornGN\ DESIGN OAAWtNG\ lOHO'. ll G 03 19 201.-_ AfCOVUlDWG 1083 MA_ T_ERIALS IN PLAN/" SECTION SYMBOLS
AG<; RECA. 1£ BASE < CEhTO! UNE
ow, mR
GRAV£ L
L ''""
l- 1
ASPHALT COMO,:['"'[ P. lllNG
0 "'
I. · I
H'"W CO-. CliE"£ I NU'- IBER OR POUND
o' L- OTCH 8,1,SiH OR INLP
v½½½ l
w. sONRT OR COHCRCT 81. 0CK
9• TEST 30RJNCS { SB OR e )
Ol. 11. L HOLE ( DH)

GRATING
8a .11
pa1, VOJ[ HI BE" ICH WRK
OR SJRVEY I. IONlUEN"'
CHECKER P...A"'E a .. WATER MfTER
wmai ,"

GA- SMITER
srra
0 ''
CU... O< H
om AL. U UINUM
0- Y"'--VES \ EXIST, lfl1lfTI[ S)
P( NlNGOfl: QCPR£' 55KlN
IN St.> B OR WALL .
e:,. TEL£ P-iOHE, -' OWER OR LICHT POLE
ir: SU' NEYE:;) POlf,; T --
o= "-'"""
s--[ ktsn' IG CONTOUR _ y:j_ ""'"""""''
GROU,_ O LNE - M-- GlO& VAi. iE
elJSHES oq REE UHE -
f•-f-- BliTT£ RfLY VA. LYE OR 0-W. PER
9 Ccy SHques OR TREE
3- WH VALVE
s-- O. r. iO' IGS~ UNE +
E
EXISlNG ELECTRIC OR TELEPHONE •- W,,_ VALVE --~--
T
E>; ISn' 4G GAS U. E
r

ANGLE VALVE
DISTI' IG WATER Lit,[
SO-- SfORM ORA! t. -+- SLU. CE OR SUD£ GATE
1Tf- 51. JJOE OR STOF' GATE
ElOSTl' IC FU. Cf _
X- L -'IR RaEASE -"" O YACLIUM ~ F - lf---)(-- N~ FD,. C[ COMBl' lATIO' IYALY[
W/&/ 20'. l - o BE 00, l( LISH[;)
NOTE: ~ -
o BE ABA.\ IDQNE'.)
SEr owe Cl- 01 FOR AOOITIO" tAI.. SY\ IEIOLS.
0BEMOOIFl£ 0
8T "' " '

1. UU ~, ""'" ,.,,,., -"
5 ASUE
sn,
BC
ocr
8FG
8FV
BHP
800
eux;
BM
800
BOS
BOT . ., ., ....

C
C
C/ C
o.u
CB
CH/ OP
CH< D
C,
CF
CfflC
c.,
CL
CU<
r-r" rnA1 Annrir\ ll ATl/"'\ t..lCAB- l'll.lUNt. U """ ~ Al , UIL, ,.,,.., ..,,,.......,~ ANCHOR 80lT ""' F'([ T ~ WlNU"' E Pr' POINT OF TANG£ HCY -~ At.'£ RN, 1., WG CURRENT, ~ HAI. T CONCRETE "" FEET PER SECOND ,., P\. UG VAL. YE AMnro,, w FPT fElrAALEPtFETI- REAO ,., c POlYVl' fn.. CHLORf) E Al. ll\ llNI. JU FR? flBER PEI,._~ ? LAS, C ""' POlYYl' IYl CHLJ:) l;.1()£ PRESSU! iE '' 1"£ ~"°" " nHESCREEN ,,.., POINT Of VERTICAL INT( RS[ CllOH
vc. 1, c. r. ML ,-.. oor. c: v i,-..11ut' l.::i ~
AT FlR fl.( X) f< l'SIG POUNOS PER SOUJ,£ NOi CAI. I:;[ H'l.W ENGlNWIING, INC.

T-~-~• •"" rDr acr :: S.,.'., ~!'<.,~.!:~,:.-.- um,.- NlW =~= till. Su! td50 WW. NlWfHG. COM
Jil~ NAnotW.. STN« lAROS INSTITlHE FT rrrr OR FOOT
AP:> ROnAAIE FTG FOOITHG
AJRRElE' AS[ VAL\'( fV > U: L
AM( Rl("..<, N SOCICTY 0, u.£: CHA' t!C.,I(. .. G4UGE
HQNffRS CN: GRAHUI. M ACTVAT[ O CAR90N
WERICU4 SOC'£ TY Of" T£ STING WAT£~ GM. O< U. DNS
ATI. IOSPI- ER' E "'-' c-ALvA.• um
CB GRADE 9R£ NC
GI. GROIJhO UHE
BlOWU' co GEAA OPt: RATD
BEG. tll- lNG Of' CtJRVE """ 00!. 0NS PER !-- OUR
OC!WE!H ""' GAU. OHS P[R MIN JTI:

BU- 0 F"...>. NCE ""' '"'°'
BUTT£ RflY VAL. VE c,p GAI.. V. t..'i!ZEO STITL PIPE
BRMEHORS~ " GATE: V"- Vf
BIOLO!;;! Clr, l AGE" 1T
BtJl:.. OHG H t-EIGHT """
H8 "°"""
B£ HCHIUJl< HOH 1-ICH DENSITY POLY£ THYI.. OIE
BIO- OGICAL OX" f'CCN OE'-"' NO HCC HYOIW.. UC (: R, t,{)( UN( BOTTOM OF SrrEL ""' t-;UUN- 1 MACHINE INfE! iFACE
BOTTOM "°" 1- tM0- 0- r-...,_,.. o
BR· TISi-' TI- ER\ olAL Uf,, IJ HOO« Z 1-'0RIZONTAL
IW. L VAI.. Vf HP H>~' ER. 1-ICH Pl< ESSU~
B,,\ C,(\ l,ASH WATE1 HR hAt. O~-
HSS liOt. LOW S"RUCTVRE SURf' ACE
DCC~ C( LSIIJS HNI. 1- ICHW, t,"'[ Rl.£ VEl
COt, IP1£' iSOR """' HYO"-' WC
CENTER TO CENTER """"' HYOROPNEUW. T'C
O. UST< HZ t->ERT2
CATCH a... slN
CUBIC FEET , o INSIO( O.AMETER
CJBIC FEET P£ R MINUTE " ltNER~ El. EVAOOH
C-iAIH OPERATED . INS()£ FACE
C.. jfCKEfi. EO '" "'"'"
CAST lhON '""-"''""
CAST II\. Pl.,\ C( '"""- O< SU"'"""
CRCULA1 '"' ..,,.-
CONSTRLCTlON JO NT '"" INS' ffil.. M£ NTATION PIPWG
c:) ITER. JNE "' IRRIGA, ON
R
RC,
Ri:'. SAA
RED
REF
REIN•
REO
RSO
RaM .,
RSP ..
s
S/ S
SBR
SCN
SO<
scv
so
SECT
s•
SST
S M
s.

SL/ 38
so
ss
sr,
smsn.

SHIH
sn, ucr
RflNfORCEO CCNCRETr PIPINC
ROtffORCE\ IENT SAAS

REDUCER
RUU< ENCE
REM' Oi< CEO . RONFCR<.: t.C
REQUJR[ O
RE' VERSE- OfF- AUTO
R£ VOLUllONS PER WIHVTE
R[ TVRN
RE\.' Ol\ JTlOHS PER SECOND
R,O..W '"'-"° ER
SLOP£, S£ WfR
SlART- SIOP
s,. i,, Pl£ AIR
SVSPENOCO AIR flJr ATIO' I
SE: OUEHCINC BATCH Flf>, CTOR
STA.' IOARO CUBIC f'EEf PCR MI\ IUTf
SCt- EOIJt.. E
SH, l.f'TL£ SSCO,.' V( YOR
STORM°"""'
SW> DH
SOUAAE FE:~
SHEL
SIM' I.AR
SI. VOCE
SHORT LEG &\ CX- TO- BACIC
SHOflT LEG ' Y( RllC, l,l
STAOCP~ RE
SPECJflCAfO' IS, SP[ Cl, IL

SNIPLE PORT
SOUAAE
SlAN- ES' i STEEL

STATION
ST<..,...,
Sl1FF£ NER
STEa
SfORM WATE~
Sl' RI. ICT\) R(, STRUC: 11. JfW.
il
I
i
a:
z
w
s a:
cc "
CML& EC CEMENT MORT. AA UHEO ANO E:> OXY COATtO . OR JOG- OIT- ROIOTt SUP """°"' CMLC CEMENT MORTAA LINED , uro CO, t.T.:O . r
CUP CORRuCATto MCTAL. P PE
cuu CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT ""
co CCCMOJT
u, s
coo C> i[MICAL OXYGEN D( MANO
CDl eotw, LF
COH CONCHfTRIC LG
COHC CONCRCTE U/88 , ....

CONMCTION W<
CONST CONSTRIJCJION u ,

CONT CONTIWOUS LOR
COUP COUflJNC , os
CF' YC C• t.J) RINA. Trn POlYYINYl Cl- lClJUOE .,
CST CAR30N ST[£ L U<
C' l<C onac..oo LT
cou,; T£ RSU' IK eou oq SCREW
cu CJac "
CV Cl" l[CK VALV( """
en. CYUNOER ...

UBR
0/ B OESG' I BLII. JJ ucc
080 Off£ RR:: J BOl 7NG DEVICE "'"
DBL """"' MGO
DC ~£ CT OJRJ. EHT ""
DCV OfSt< CHECK VALVE ..._
DEG DEGSEE .....

OET OETNL ....

DH OR" U. to-OLE ""' ~
OUCTLE IRO,.. "" ......

OIAMCTER ""'"
l)w; ONAL ( P.} ~-... ,
NSKJH "
D' 5CH ""°""" ...

ON 00,, N NC
DP Oll' F£ RD. TW. PR£ SSUR£ MC
o,,c ORA. WING ""·'
NOC
OST EXtSTING """
EA ""'" ""'
EC [ NO Of CURVE ""'
ECC ECC::' fTRIC "''
EF EACH > N: E ~
EC EXISTING G' W)[
EJ D: PAHSIIJN JOINT DC
EUl EU! OW oc,
El£ V [ LEVAOO' I 00
CMBul [ W8EOOCO O, C
EP EOC. E OF F,,_VOIENT "'
EPC EPOlCY COITEO oPER
EPOXY UED OP>, G
EPtC EPOXY L. N~ # IC COAT[ O ...

ED EOU"'- DSC ,
oe EOUAUZATION 8A.' ilf,I
au [ l.APS[ C TWE ~~ "

EW EACH WAY PB
OEC' l(ES F- YiR( NHE1f "'- BG
F '"" eu: ""
Fl.. ANCEC COUPLING AON' T[ R O' LCS
FOB FlOW OISH13UTION BOX -
n: flNAI.. EfTWCNl ""'
FG FINISI-- EOGRAOE "°'
Ftt "'""""""" ""
f1G RGURE """ "' """' ""'"
fl FLOW l.lNE ""' >
LEX fWOB<. E PSF
flC fLmcE ""
JOONT
KNIFE CATE Y.lrl. Vf..
eovNDS
LINEAR fITT
L.DIG7- 1. LOH~. UOlNlED GAS
LOOG LEG B, trCX- TO- BACK
LONG U: G HORZONTAL
U)t,,G LEG V£ 1TCAL
LOCAL- OfT- RO• Cf' t

LOCKOUT- STOP

LOW PRESSURE
L. Ot,: GRADIIJS
UGHT
MOTOR ...,. .....

W. C- tl~ E eoLT
UEl.. tBAA' IE BIOREACTOR
MOTOR CO" TROC. CENTfF!

MANUFACTURER
M LI. JOH GALLONS PER OAY ....,...,
o.N if,,C.'1 ( OR 0. 025• mm)
MC: CHANICAL. IOWT
MA. I.£ P1PE TH~
MJN! CFAL W, 11'£ R
cw
1'EUTRA. l
hOT APPUCABLE
M7JRAl_ CAS
1' 01 1H CONTRACI
UI. W£ R
t. o; u. u. uY O. osto
hO~ YQPO;
hOU! NAL PIP( Sil(
MTIONAL FIP[ Tl1REAO
1'. 0f TO SCALE
t.EEOLE YA. LY::

ON COITER
Of' rn- Cl05[- AUTO
OUTSIDE OIAMET:'. R
OUfSI()( > AC(
OP::~ TO~ INTE~ AC[ T:: RM) NAl
Of' E~ TEO. QPOU. TOR
OP[" fl' iG
ODOR R( OIJCTlON TECI- NOlocY
OPE,..- STO"'-- C- OSE
FUt. lP
PULL 90X
PV, T[
w"""'
FROGRAl./ wa.£ LOGIC COfffi. OU .. ER
PM[ l(EUCTRICAL)
FOitH OF COHNECTIOH
PO: NT Of INTERSCCTiO' I
RJWERPDlE
PARTS F£ R MI. W:- 4
FRESSJRE RECUlATING VALVE
POUNOS P£ R SOUAAE FHT
POVNOS P:: R SQUAA£ .. ct- t

N SOLEHOIO VALVE
S'l'1,11,l(TR•CAL
T& C TOhGUE A,NQ C'! O() II£
T/ 8 TOP AHO BOTTOM
T£FC TOT AU Y 0. CLOSEO. > AN COOU: 0
TEL m. EPi- lONE
TI11CKNESS
TA.-. K
TDC TOf' OF C()t,,CRETE ,
os IOP Of" STEEL
TSS TOTAL SUSP£ N0£ 0 SOUOS
TW ' IRE, lT[ QY, Al£ R
T'<P """"-
UG l1HD£ RGROUNO
UOH UNl.£ SS OTH~ R~ tSE NQTEO
VALY[, VOLl, \ IOLTIIIGE
YlfRlflEOCL,\ YPIPE
RT == ,
r-o VARIABLE FRCOL' ENCf ORT/£ .. ,
V""'- T
I • m<
W/ 0 WllHOJl
WATER COL. JMN
WArrR LEVEl -~
WORKeOM
l
WATER SURf" ACE
Y,'flGH" f ,,.

WASTCWATER
WWF WELOEO 11\ R[ FA!;! RIC
y:, , ORI)
z
z
O
u..
0 u
PRQl{ CTNO.
105- 0002
cc
z
z
z
O
OIUG! N.&. l$NEITSIZ!
ANSl•D
SHEET
G-103
V,
z
0 i=
w
a:
a,
a,
0 z
0 <
O ::;;
V,
1084
M
AGA
80 aw
CA
CD
CLS
cs
D/DRN
DG
DS/OSL

DSL ( AB)
ErF
ELEC
EX
FA
FC
FD
FM
FW
G
GR
GRE
HPOG
HS
H•
H•R
HWS
IA
INF
LAT
LO
LPG
M1.SS
or

F''WCESS FLOW ABBREVIATION

AERATION AIR
AGtTt..,.lm~ AJR

BOTTOM DRAIN

BACKWASH

COMPRESSOR AIR
CHE~IO.L DRAIN ANO VEN"

CIRCULATED SLUDGE

CAUSTIC SODA
DSAJN

DCESTER GAS

D GESTED SLUDGE
D GESTED SLJDCE ( AeA'IIOCNEO)

EXHAJST AIR

EFFLUENT

ELECTRICAL
ENGINE EX>-IAUST
rQUL AIR

FERR C CHLORIDE
FLOO~ JRAJr..
f"ORCE MAltl ( SEWER)
FIRE WATr:R
GAS U~ES
GRIT
GREASE
HIGH PRESSURE Q1G~STER GAS

HEATED SLUJGE

HOT WATER
HOT .. YATER R:TURN

HOT WATER SJPPL'T'
INSTRUtr.lENT AIR

INFLUENT
LATERAL ( SEWER}
NG·NE LUBE OIL

LIOUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS

MIXED LIQUOR
MIXED UCUOR RETURI\I

MIXED UCUOR SUSPENDED SOLIDS
OVERrLOW
PVMPEO OWN, PLANT ORAJtl
PRO,P,RY EJ:TLUENT. PL'NT EFF'LUEtH

PROPANE GAS
PR0,4ARY INFLUENT. PL.ANT INFLUENT

PERMEATE

POLYMER
P ..At-. T PROCESS WATER

PRIMARY SLLOGE
PRIMA.RY SCUM

POTABLE WATER

RETURN ACTIVA-EO SLUDGE

RAW SLJDGE

SLJOGE BEO OECA'IT
SJBt~ATANT

SCN SCREE'IINGS
SE SECON0.4.RY EFFLUEN"'"
SH SODIUM HYFOCrlLORITE
SLC SLU%E CAKE

SN SUPERNATANT
SPD SUMP PUl.4P DISCHARGE

SSC SECONDARY SCUM

SW SEAL WATER

TD TANK DRAJ'II

TFE TRICKLING FILTER EFFLUEM
TD T •·UCKE"IER OVE RFLOW

TSL THICKENED SLUDGE
TWAS T'"'ICKENED WASTE ACTIVATfO SLUDGE
t, W UTILITY WATER

VAC VACUUM

VT VENT
w WATER

WAS WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE

WG WASTE GAS

WW WASTE WATER
DESIG~~Af.ON
AAS
A3
AMX .,
Bw'
BRP
BSC
CCT
CP
DAFT
0GB
OG
DSP
OSP
GP
GRP
GRT
HEX
HPT
HWP
IGR
IP
EQUIPMEN' DESIGNATIOf\ S
EOUIPMEUT OESIGNATIOf,; EQUIPME!\IT

AERATION AIR BLOWER MBR MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR
AGITATION AIR BLOWER " BS MECHANICA.LLY CLEA,-.EO 8AR SCREEN MDXC M XER MLRP MIXE:0 UCUOR RECYCLE PUMP
BIOn LTER MX MECHANICAL I.I XER
BOLER PAC PRESSUR ZA710U AIR COMPRESSOR
BO LER RECIRCULA TIOtl PUMP PCP POlYMt: R CIRCULATIQf',j PUMP B.AR SCREEN PF PROCESS FAN
CHLCR11'E CO"ITACT TANK PCP POLYME:R FEED PUMP
AIR COMPRESSOR PCT Pot.Yt.lE':R FEED TANK
DISSOLVEC AIR FlOATION TH CKENER PTI< PRESSUR ZATION TM<:

DIGESTER WASTE GAS BUR"ER ( FlARE) P.S PLANT WA-ER PUl.4P

DIGESTER RSP RAS PUMP
OAF RECYCLE PUMP sec SCREENINGS COMPACTOR
DRAJ"IAGE SUMP PUMP SDG STANDBY DIESEL POWER GENERATOR

CRT PUMP SC SLLICE GATE

GREASE PUMP SGR SLLDGE GRINDER
GR T REMOVAL TANt< SLG SLIDE GATE

HEAT EXCHANGER SMX STATIC MIXER
HYDRO-PNEUMATIC TANI< SSP SECONDA.~Y SCUM PUMP
HOT WATER PUtwP TS0 TWAS PUt,1P
IN-LINE GRINDER UCP UN T CONTROL P,ti.NEL
INFLUENT PUMP WSP WAS OUJ.IP
I
OW(NGIW.(ONG,<HC.

32. WEICMrli' loRelllSu! t"l!.
lrflnl, CA92fm
WWW. H2WEHGCOM
l!)
z - o ~~~
s
it
o ~ z
t ~~
0 i
f ~
a
z • ~
9 l!)~ 5 ~
g~·
z <; j Z
I
al ~ ~
0::
z
UJ
0::
a "-•
Vl
z
0 0::

CD
CD
0 z
l
0 CD
Vl
l
a
I
I
I
i
i
f •
I
I
I
I
i
d~ ~ ~ i
e ~
FIIOIECTNO 3,
105-0002 ~
OIIIGIN4UHEETSIZE ~
ANSl-0 ~ ~
5NE£ T· ~
L-.:...:=........ J ,
PD
PE
PG
Pl
PMT
POL
ppW
PS
PSC
PW
RAS
RSL
SBD
SBN
SC SCUM G-104
1085
D:ESKiH IHEl. UFNJ WASTEW6IEB a QW SECONDARY JREJJlffNT

IIDI UNIT EXISTING UPGRADE ITEM UNIT
AVER'GE OAJLY FLOW L'GD J.6 MECHA." IICAL Fl"' IE SCREEN NU MBER MAX DAY FlOW OGD 7 2 CAPAC IT'r, EACH MCD
OPENING SIZE ""
INFLJENT WAS -[WAfER CHARACTERI STICS MEU3RANE B10REACTOR ( MBR) UNIT BOO MG / L 317 AERATION BASIN, EAC - t ( L. W, D) FT
TSS MG/ l 318 r,,O. or 8- ISINS NUMBER
TOTAL NITROGE" I MG/ L > 60 MEMBRANE TANK, EACH ( L. W. H) FT NO. OF ~ NS NUMBER

DESIGI', MLSS MC/ L
PfSICH ffOllFNT QlJ& fTY DESIGN SYSTEM SRT DAY
fT£M
BOO ..., G/ l JO < 5 MBR FEED PUMPS NUMBER
TOTAL INORGAN C NITROGEN lrlG/L 22 < 7.5 CAPACITY, EACH GPM ss t. iG/ l JO < 5 MOTOR, EACH HP
PRIMARY IBEATMEtil P£ RMEATE/ BACKPULSE PUMPS NUMBER
ITEM CAPACI TY , EACt-, GPM
MOTOR. EACrl HP

HEAOWORKS
4ECHAN1CAL BAR SCREEN NUMBER 1
CAPACI TY WGO 5
WAS PU1,1PS NUMBER
OPE' IIING SIZE " D. 25 CAPACIT'r, EACH GPM
YANUAL BAR SCREEN NUMBER 1
i,m-oR, EACH HP
OPE", IING SIZE ltl . 1 5
M8R CHDIIC . . l:.L FEED SYSTEM COMPACTOR ' IIUMBER J
CITRIC ACID PI.JIIP NUMBER
CAPACITY CU. FT/ HR 133
CAPACITY. EACH GPH
40TOR, EACH HP
GRIT BASIN ' I/UM BE R 1
HEAD. EJ.CH PSIG
DIAMETER fT 18
SODIU M HYPO PUMP { NOTE 1) NUMBER
GRIT WASHER/CYCL0I',::: NUMBER 1
C~ ACIT' r, EACH GPH
CAPACIT'r. EACH UGO 3 6 MOTOR, EACH HP
HEAD. EAC H PSIG
FERRIC SUL. FATE FEED PUI. IP NUMBER 2 STORAGE CAPACITY GAL CAPACITY. EACH G'H 28
II0TOR, EACH HP 0.5
AERATION BLOWERS NUMBER HEAD, EAG-< PSI 1S0
STORAGE CAPACITY GAL 2DDO CAPACITY . EACH SCFM

MOTOR , EACH HP
PRIMARY CL. ARIFl[ RS NUMBER 2 1 ( 0PTIONAl)

AIR SCOUR BLOWERS NUMBER

WEST TANK
CAPACITY . EACH SCFM
DESIGN F ... 0W RATE MGO 1 6 MOTOR, EACH HP
JIAMETER r 45
SOE WATER DEPTI I FT 6.5 AIR COMPRESSOR NUMBER
AST T~ K CAPA:ITY. EACH SCFM
DESIGN Ft.OW RATE MGO 2 MOTOR. E,t1. CH HP
DIA. METER F' 50 HEAD. EACH PSIG
SIDE WATER DEPTH FT 7
t,,[ W TANK
DESIGN F _ow RATE MCD 2 JllSlliillilQII
DIAMETER r 50 ITEM UNIT
SI:>£ WATER DEPTH FT 7
CHLORINE CONT.A.CK TANK HUME[R
E0 BASIN STATION PUMPS ( BY OTHERS) NUMBER 3
NUMBER Of P. ASSES /\ UMBER
C,.::>ACIT'r, EACH " GD 3.6 0I ME~ SIONS oi:- EACH TANK ( L, W. D) fT MOTOR. EACH HP 70
EO BAS N VOLU ME MG 2.1
CHLORINE C0~ TACT TAHK EFFLUENT PUMP NUMEER
CAP. A. CIT'!'. E> CH GPM

MOTOR, EACH H'
HEAD. EAC H FT
WBAIJlltj

ITEM UNIT
REVERS[ 0SYOSIS ( RO) UNIT ( O?- I0NAL) tlUMEER
PERM EATE CAPACITY, EACH " GD
RECOVERY %
NOTE.
1) TO BE USED FOR MBR SYSTEM ANO CH ... ORl' IIE
C0' IIT. ACT TANK
2) C0WERT EXISTIHG SECONDARY 0IGESTEQ TO PRIMA. RY

DIGESTER
3) ALL 0RAW · NGS ARE C0NCEPTIJA. L ANO Sl. BJECT TO

CHANGE BY THE DES GN BUILD ENTITY
BiOSOl IDS PBQCfSSING

EXISTING EXPANSION ITEM UNIT
2+ 1
MECHANICAL tilCKENER NUMBER J.6
2 NFLUENT SLLDGE FLOW, EAC~ G' M
DAILY SLUDGE GE-'llrn,,. TIOt~ LBS/ D,& Y
120. JO, 18 NEA. T PO-.. YMER 40% FEED PUMP NUlr' 3ER
4 ( 3+ 1) CAPACIT' r. EACH GPH
4 5, 13, 10 Y- OR, EACH SP
4 HE, lO, EACH PSI

6.000 - B.000
20 ANA. E: RCBIC PRIMARY DICESTERS Nl.!>. IBER
0 ,AMETER fT
3+1

S DE WATER DEPTH FT
4,200
WATER SLRFACE ELEVAT0N fT 40
TOTAL VOLUME GA..

SOLIDS RETENTIQr,. OAYS
3n
840 HEAT EXC.- tANGER NUMBER
10 CAPACllY, EACH G0 M

MO- OR, EACH HP

HEAD , EACH FT
1+1
50 -
t0T WJ. TER 901LER• NUIIBER 5
CADACITY, E,IIC'i BTU/ HR.
t" 0T WATER C RCJLATI0t-. PUMPS NUI.IBER
1+ 1 CAPACITY, EACH GPM
6 1--EAD, EACH fT
1 MOTOR, EACH SP
60 rlEAT EXCHANGER NUIIB£ R
2+· CAPACITY , EACH BTU/ HR.
6 1
SLUDGE DRYlt~ C BEDS ' I/UMBER
60 0 MENSI0NS Of" EACH BED ( L , W) FT
25DD
3+'
1,400
100
J +l
800
40 2
26 7.5
125
EXISTING EXP~ SION
1 J
5 J
601.20x12 961.20x9
1+·
694
15 50

EXISTING EXPANSION
4+1
0 4
93 EX ISTING EXPANSK> N
1 1
50 B.DDD
2 1+1
0 -25 1

0.5 60
2 1 ("' OTE 2)
35 35
26 2·,
24 19
172. 7' 8 136.735
20 20
1 100
10 173
1 64- 0, 000
2 9G
9G
1 1
JOO .ODO 415.000
12 13Sx25
3240Elcaminofltal . Suit~ l.5C
U. i2' itll
WWN. Nzwa« i.COM
g ;;
I ~ r!i ~
2 5
iJ
a: ~ <
z
w
s a:

0..
a:
w
f0.. a:

I;; ~
u
z :: i
z
z t;; ~ \!)
t i:; <.!) vi <
cc ~ ~ ~ w
z 0
z
z <
u cc
I; 9 ~
a ~ ie
PAOl£ CTOO.
105- 000 2
ORIGNAlSHEETSllE

ANSI- D
G-105
i
I
i
il
i
i . •
t
g
b
I
I
I
i
I
i ;
i ,,
1086
COMPACTOR3
BAR'°"""
MEOW«: Al
8ARSCREB<

CONTAINER

OOMP, C, OR
GRIT
CONT_.,.. ER
GRH
GRH
07 B< T

SPLITTER BOX
EOJAUZATION BASt- l
PIJMPSTATia- 1

BT OTHERS)
RSl
l

QAAFER, PE
I
Cl. AAFIER' 1 PE
R5L
I
PE
em_,...,

PUMP STATION
HEA<
EXO< AHGER
l
f '
i
FLTEFl1
RtO< Lt« l
FI.. TER2
5LUOG€
Hta< ENER
PER• "' ""™ EATE
e<RM
PER• ft
PERMEATi' -""""' ..
fi ....

PERMEATE """
8AO< WASH
PIJMP2 ..

PERM """ _,. ft ..

TRKXLINOFLTER
REaRO. Un ON ""-
PF€""-" R'

PIJMPSTATION
HO< ENEO

UOGEPUMPS

19..
o/
DIGESTER2 :: CIGESTERJ
r/////////////~ r

CRYNGBEOS
SEC< lNO< R<
ClARFER •
RFER2
EXc, w«; ER
SOOk/ M
HYPO
1) OPTION 115 TO INSTAU. Ti£ ROFACIUTI AT n-E SU4LM£ 6
OCU' flRYa....._ BRIIE WILLBE CI SPOSEDOF- INTHECJTYOf' BE.AI.UONTSEWERSYSTEM.
m OPTlON2 IS TOINSTAU. n-EROFACaJTY AT Ti£ BANNINO' MVTP.

SAINE WOUl. O BE CISPOSEO OF 11'4 Off. 8fTE EVAPOW. TKlH POt< OS. l) ~:: iGH~~ PTlJAL At«> SUBJECT TOC> W«'. iE BY
I .. RO .. ~~ NO~
BR• E
AKES
oou, mn

0.JSTOMERS
NlWENGINtERING, IHC.
i
i ;,
a::
z
I I ~ -__,
a
I
i
I ,- I C I -.~ - -•
I " I ~ [ -~ "
T
a«.. ORINE CONTACT
CH.. ORttE CONTACT ,.,.,
o
PEROO<-' n ON
PONOS
ION I
Z t;;o
C i:; 5
co ~-
o ~i
0 I I

0..
t;;o
W N
ta~
l95 ~
i ~·
z u z ~~~
co
a::
i5
g
u_
V)
V)
w
u
0 a::

0..
i
I
I
i
I
I
I
i
I
l
i
i
i •
i •
I~ I-t • • -! I •
FROJtCTOO. 3
105-0002 ~
OIUGIN-' LSHlflSIZE ~
ANSl-0 !
1 1 G-106 ~
1087
0 n- :

S
r
rri .. (/)
i , rri
J!,. r,::
o_-<
1 0
q - i
i
i
I
I
I
I
L
1z l ~~ "''"' Cl~,~ IM~fv ~r~l~G
t 1----------'•_ N"_' N_G._CA_•_m_o _______ -- l
n
I .....
0 .....

BANNING WWTP
2242 CHARLES STREET
BA NNING, CA 92220

CIVIL SITE PLAN
F
I
I
I
z
u
I
o
r'l
r'l ;.
o
0 o
L
0 OJ
0 0
i
r'l ;
o
PRELIMINARY 7/9/2024 4:20 PM
4 I
I
J
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FIL[; C;\USlRS\ 11115 JIMEl, 1£Z\N2W ENCilNHIIING\ U2W SUMR • SERVER ( l)\PII. 0JEOS\ I0S- Clll Of KANNING\ lOS- OOOl 0WN[/ 1 ADVISOR WIWWT'\ 6. PROJECT ENGINEERING AJj0 Of: SIGN\ 06 .0I_ PREUMINJ, fn' DU! Ci/~ D! SIGN DAAWING\ MBR Sm PLAN JAMES WANG 0121 2024 0WG I 1088 7 tc
z e
z
EmUEW
PUMP STATlOf~
LLJ
w
k
LJ
TOC 3 5
ltoo
90T::: 5.5

CHEM CAL

LAB ROOM
ROO"

PERM - ANKS
11 11 H H
NOTE
1) ALL DRAWINGS ARE CONCEPTUAL AND

SUBJECT TO CHANGE BY THE DESIGN BUILD
ENTITY.

QITlCE
D
PERM / 8-N PUMP
I ~
I H ; I H
i
a,
r------
MECHANICAL ::, LAN AND SECTION
SCALE: 1/ 16"= 1'- 0"
II Ill AERATION TANK 1
r' r;:::::::::;;;;1.c lll A£RATICN TAl!K 2
l~J !i AERUICN TAUK 3

MBR FEED
PUl, IO
11· 1 sr, noN
TOC 3 5 - II N
BOT - 16. 5 II -----
lg
I I I
lD a.
z 0
il'
0 i !
a
I
I , '
I
a: • ~
w -. ~ !
s ~ ~ ~
CL ~
z
0 i= ~
0 z <
z
i
a.

I
i
ii
i
B
1 1
l z :;: ~ -' < I
I
z <
5 "' ~-
0 ~ •
r:: ;,,
u
lD z
z I
z <
z ~ < ~ "'
I
I
I ,;
I i § I
PROJECT NO ~
10S- 0002 f I
OIUGINALSHEE' TSIZ£ 3
ANSl• D ~
M -101
1089

ABBREVIATIONS
A! RltifASEVN.\ E ,,, .. ..,
SF BUITERFl..' l'VH.'- 1: "' KMFEGATEVAL\' E ... -... .. .... " "''"""' """ BOTIOMOFCCN:: PEIE L< M IN' EllA""'"" .,.

Ba. Tfl. lERPRESS ..

WO: PRES: SUIIEV~ VE. ... """"' ., !
Wl.Voll.VE ... MU. DilW1. 0NSPERDA' I' ..

BAOO. V,UH -"""'"""""' ... """"'""""" ~ ....,, .. .......

Cf1i ""™" """ IEWR, l,.',E~CASSa"! E

0. -.. MOTCROPERA' llll
CUIEN' f~a,,ED
CEMENTIIORTAAU' EDNaJEPOJCfCO,\ lm H """' ""'
CEYE.' ll'h'O!ITARU' EDHl) COATED .. -""" "'"""" "'·' """"' CON'< "'"""""' ,., NOTTOsat. E
ac. a! PIA. m> POlYWM. Ol. ORllE .. """"'"'" " """"""' ,,._ CONfRCl. OifCt( VAlV!: 00 ""'""'"'"'"' "' """-"•
oc DISKCHECK\' AI.VE ... -""
OffEREHiW. f'RESSI. R.S.'lfTQl .. .......,. ,. '""""'"""' """ """""" " """"'"""'"" DR """' fP "'-"""""""
m, o ""'""' .... PO. TWfft. QI. OOlll:. ., ~'
IN.\'£ ... """""' ' '''" ""' -
EC EPOX' f'C04ffll """ "'"""' "" """"" "' "'"""'
s soon,
SD STO! WPv. lN
B£ C '"""""'- SE """""" "'
EPOX' fCW. TED "" """'""""""""' "' """ .....
au """' ""
EPQXYIN: D,,_'fOCO,, TEO ., """'""' '"" """" " '""""'""' ,, ....,. n ""' .. ...... ,,,,,, "" .,,....
a. flOlR
a.o '"""' " ToPOFQIIS
A.T """"' "" -,,..

Ai!EflfiH< FORCEDFI. ASTJ; "" """'""""" " ........... ""' TURSWtJ. HAI. VZER. ,..

MAlalWATEJI
GR """" .,,. """'-
GATEVAI. VE
GW """"""""" .. UlJ. JJY\' IAlER ,.. "-""""'
fllGIDE.',' SllYPOl. l'ETIM. ENE "'
HYt: ftOOEN!: tt.1'111: . ; YESl'
HYDRO ""'"""'"' WT """"
wm """" .,
WATERSUr! f'ACE
w \\\\ SU:: W,. TER
LABELING _____ __ --
1----- & .....,....,..,.

L _______ J
lWSCQ> EOl'! OPA. Y.'Slffl. JEDA! I
PACl( AGEA,' O'ORSICD.

TWSCOPEOFSUPR.. Y.l.OOSUlFflY
lH. fSSOll£ R'MSEHOfED.

EQUIPMENT
I ~-
l!YOTHeRS)
IOOSlER '""'
MECHANICAL/ PIPING SYMBOLOG' l'
I
PIPING

SINGLE LINE DOUBLE LINE DESCRIPTION -----
NeNP< PE
J-~ lnsow
1,_ Jk Im'
CROSS
I-= REOUCL'<
Q-= ECCOffRiC '< EOIJCt: R
11--- e:$ 3- n.ANGEO JOINT
II -- E==fi- BUNO fl.ANG(
i½-~ IJECrlANICAL COUPUNC
e$3- CROO'.' E0 C0UPUUG

PIPE SIZING

MAXIMUM VELOCITY
A:R: 300 Ff/ MIN FORCE MAi' I: 7 Ff/ S
SUCTION PIPING: 4 ' T/ S GRAVITY PIPE: "' Ff/ S
DISCHARGE: 7 Ff /S
VALVES

SINGLE LINE IDOUBLE LINE I DESCRIPTION
0--1-1--~
lf8f---_,,_ 8UTTERf' l.Y VAi. VE --
OIAPI- IAAGM VAi. VE --

GATE VALVE --

CLOSE VAL' IE
KN! fE GATE VAi... VE
Cf'---·=--- NITCU: V/ IJ.. 1/f.

PINCH VAL\' E --
PUJG VN.. 1/ E
M---~ TI- IRE£ WAY 9AU. VALVE
001--~ THREE WAY PLUG V> J.. VE
4--- BAL:.. 0- iECk VN... Vf. ---

CHECK VALVE
RI-- orsc CHECK ' IAlW
c, 1---< I- CONE \ IALVE
OR~ 1 OR-- ele-- 1 PRESSURE REJJEF VALVE
1-~,
PRESSURE REOOC< NG VALVE
1· tX AIR RUEASE/ VACUUU VALVE
A= AIR !< El. EASE
V = VACUltM
I~
PRESSURE 1-' EOl.! L.Atl" iG VALVE
SOL£ HOIO VALVE

MISCEUANEOUS ----------------------
iv ---
ru----
Ol---
1 -----<:
o<»
ll
@
y_,,
D<::J
IG':J7
D
El
rn
R
BACKfl<iW PREVENTER
RESTRICTION: ORIFlCE PLATE
wtE STRA. 1<ER
FLEXIBl..£ e! OSE OR TUB! t.'G
Fl.£( 18LE PIPING CONNECTION
UNE TURNlhG OO' NN
UNE Tl. WNll'< C I.IP
BUND fl.ANGE
P< PEBRFAK
o;.11: 1< CISCO~ NECT C>- M l!c. CROOVE: COUPJJtlG
OJICK co- m£ CT AmNG

CAP OR PLUG
CLEANOUl
fl..::X18t. E CONNECTOR
Pl< ESSIJRE SAFEf!' E"I..EUENT
llW' NRACW
EJECTO~
S! 1DlCER

IHUNE SILENCER
W.CNE. 11C FLOW ' 4E. TER
INUNE liOTAMatR
CONTA! NYOff L£' vn. SI\ JTCH

REDUNDANT INSTRUMENT LOGIC
L~--&- J!t
l
Q
PEIISTAl..' TC -
Il
MOfOR OPERATED V/,J..Vf:..
l ll
I t
a
1--
0 """"" -
FtlulW. TIC VALVE

DEV FAAJJRE
0-0--0-
0 Gr:-.""'"' ~ ?
ROTATtHG OEVICES:
iYF£ t FUP. IP, DOC.

TYPE 2 FUi. 4P. \' FD

SIGNALING
El. ECTRICAL UNE

DATA LINE
PNEW.AT!C LINE

IHTERLOC(
O;FF( l;,ENCE:

NON CONTACT1,. i:; RADAR LIT
EUC!.. OSURE:.

JUCTlON SOX ( JS)
SOtEtlO! D BOX ( SB)
Tl' PE 3 CHEMIOL PIJMP, OOl I.OCAl OPERATION PANEL ( LO?) rYPE 4. CH; MrOd.. PUMP. STROKE CCNffiOlLE' R
TYPE 5 MIXER, OOl
LOCAL CONTROi. PANEt( LCP)
MAltl CONTROL PANEL ( MCP}
lYPE 6 MlXER. \/ FD
AUTOUATIC \/ Al\'£:

FO' i'rfR DISTRIBUTION PAN£ L ( POPj
ANAi..' tZER IND< CATOR CONTRO!. J. ER ( AIC}
AIR 1.tANIFOLD
XV- fllf PNEUMATIC VAL' v'E, 0tl/ 0FF VftJ.. 1/E
SV- fffl sot. DICID VALVE, ON/ OFF VALVE:

W- iff# MOTORIZED VALVE, ON/ OFF VAL~
FCV- 1111 now CONTROL VAi. VE, MODULATING
PCV- lffl PRESSURE CONTROL V_.1.LVE. MOOUlAWG
ffi~ j i1 ~ ~ 8ffi ~ ; ~ ~
tNsr~ non
H FC z:

O REM< HE i l_lj ® . ..,,.,
2-..
l21l ~ ~
rn- 5500 FLV- 5500 Fr-- 5!) 00
PNEUMAT, C now
CONl, IDL VN..VE
j~·~~· ~-~ ~
c~ J~ c
@ ' i____f:: 1
1 y l
I >
XV- S..."'
t .
01 SV- 5501
L
Pt. EUW. 71C SOl. ENOIO
VM. V< IJ ::i VALVE
t ~
AL o. ~--- 0- 7
Al u. ~ K' u. :

I ~ ' NTE: R~ OC!( I
I -® ~ t LMl. LOW LOW ! ----
F£ j rf ! Or-' 1 !
f 6 5 LLL
I I ': J:" RAmRY! i'\' D~ O l I
I ! .. L l I
I I -- ft---:[' , I
I I I
l I I
I 1 1
1 l I
l I 1
1 1 I
I I I : : t
@J TK- 5EOO - 0
NnYEHGIHttAING. IHC.
3240flCimlnollealSuitt150
lrvlne, CA9Z60: Z
WWW. NAVENG, OOM
ot:io
ZwN
IN
Z,- N
z u, a,
m~ o
LJ.._:::l:(5
o"' z
o,
PllQIECT,; O,.
105- 0002
I 1 ~
I ~
I
I
i5
i
I

0... i.,J 0
1- WN
l:~gj
5' U'l a>
O
ci
zrz
zuz
NZ
Ill"'"' N ( D
N
O~ JGl! W.. SH~ ETSIZE
22" x34•
Si- EH NUMBER
QQ__
AREANUM~' I. ....

I
0 z
w
C)
w _,
t
N
ai ....
a
1090

ERVICE WATER
@Pm.Fi
HO, llN
f!JN FIJL
I
9I
6, i\lHs\ ~-
e,~~
i.J.ltRGHiCY rtOA .- IHSR! W..!. XTtRN.>. l
STOP \ l' Gl WASfl
I
l.1,1),1 T0¥. l'JE
YY? 9?
1 ! • I
T'.'-' ER Ra<
00{\
231
ORGU.
a.mu:.,
00 ~
UGP-- 1110 • N:JTE 1 & 2
V"/. l 1
sL~ 1-, # o)Y jLJ
av O ~ SCP-1110
o Oo,.;:, '. P o ?)'
SCREENING COMP/\ CTCR
0$~
I
m, .../2,\
AC~~
RDS-1100
RNARY ;', RC' M SCFEEN
I . ::" I
20 .- 1-,
w,c>-•{)~ l
1!:

SCP-1310

FUTURE SCREENING CCMNCTOR
RDS-1300
FlJTIJRE ROTARY DRl. il..l SCREE' l
t.w,,J,. ,A.NK • N"<.~!:. III C>- VIN~ U
At~r:dIT1'Afffi'"!fiCClnH ci--\.!oNl',EL
ON TANK 1N• Wrnr C-i.O."l1'£L
1: UhiT CCllTROt. PANEL
U;: P- POO A~ l:>
UCP- 1110) ARE rl'PV' JJ..

FOR ROTARY ORUM
SCREENS ! 200 MD 1300.
2: UCP PROVlDED 8Y VEIIDOR.
tl2W EffG1NffRISG, ! NC
3240ElCaminoR. eal.. 5uCtel50
MO<!, CA!! U,02
WWW. N2WWG. COM
B~
OC N
Z ,- N
z V1 m
mwu
C1
LL~ 0
ot~
um
PROE- CT:.O
105. 0002
j~
8: ~ g ~
G~
L')~ j
Z"' -<0
zG~ .
z
NZ
m><::< "~
ru
C'·i
0;\ JGfV. lSH~ fl S! ll
22"X34~
S'i~:r1- 1uMl! dl
1-101
AREAIIJMBE'<. ....

C/J
z
w
w
a::

C/J
w
z
ii:

N
0 N
ai .... .,;
0 1091
f ~ ~ ~ ~9
2~: o
120 ~_/' 20
JAC yl---,:. JAC
I I
z":}; o"o;;,:,
21:;_ 1"
00 I
VAC
1 _,__
n
i rorr ' r••« 2 I ·•=> I •NOrr '
f!:i;.;;::;.;;;;_; • 1 I
I ~ II I~----~
TK-2120
TANK t AEROEIC ZOHE
K-2130 ro, ~ ~ 11
E)
TK-2000
SM-2110
SUSl, fERSIBLE U'XER
TK-2210
TANK 2 ANCXJC ZONE
2 MTE>
SM-2210
SVBUERSIBl.£ IH' ffi
TK---2310
TANK 3 ANOXIC ZONE
Jt'
SM-2310
S\. IBMERSISlE U: XER
A£- 2210i
ORP
NOTE 2
AE- 2. 310i
O!' f'
NOTE: 2
AE- 2221 ""
N01E 2, 3
AE- 2321 ""
NOIE 2. 3
TK-2220
TMK 2 AEROBIC ZONE
TK-2320
TAAi( 3 :£ RQEIC ZONE ... .. ... •,• . ..

FUWR£ .-£. R. lTION TANK Af){ UlOti
AE- 2222
00 t10TE 2, 3
AE·· 23Z2
00 T
NGTE 2, 3
r+ II II •: .

NOTE 3 . ... .::

TK-2230
IK 2 SW> tlQ ZONE
r
I
l
I
TK-2330
TANI< 3 SWJ' lG ZON
0 0 It I I
Norr
3 SC-2030 tijo
SCUI. I SCRAPPER
I
MLSS PUtl. P BASIN TI<- 2500
SHOWN ! N P& IO I-! 03
HOA RIMK FAt. ~ RUHHHG fAt.
6r7~1---.. J Y77 r--..i...--.J
V~.fil.Q.

P-2610 P---2620
SCUI. I POMP SCUI. I PUMP
I
I
GENERALNOT£ S
1; CONTROl. S f"OR SM- 2110
AAET' IPlCAI.. FOR
SM:- 2210 A' iO SM- 2310.
2: COHTRO:. S FOR AE- 2110.

AE- 2121. AND AE- 2122
ARE rrP' YCAL FOR AE IN
TANKS TIC- 2220 ANO
11<- 2320.
3; DRo; t LEGS. AERATION
HtAOU< S, CONTROL
ALVES, ANO 00 SO- ISO~
PER om:

I
I
N2W £ NGIME£ RING, lUC.
3240£ 1CalllinoReaL5uil• lSO
lrvlne. CA. 92602
WWWR2WtNG. COM

I I I I
II 11
Ch--
zt: t~
z g: ~
Z< llm
ro ~ u
LL.~ c5
0(2~
z
LJ~
mm (
Jo,
PR01tcrr. u
105-0002
I
I
g
i5
I ~ •
I
I o
I ~
I I
rn._ Wo ~~~
m
Ul < t:
01= 10
ci
zrz
zuz
NZ
D v <
N ! D
N
0/llGINM. SHEITSiZE
22"X34~
SHfElUUM~ R
M02
NuMaea -
st
N
0 N
oi .;; ~
i m
i 0
z ~
z
0 w
1092

AERATION TANKS
SHOWN IN P.! rID 1- 102
EFFI.. UENT Cl- l>Ji', iEl.

SH! J'N' I IN P& IO l- t02
TK- 2400
o-o-o-@9:~ ~"° "'-- o-o-o-o-o ~
o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o----/.'\
I ~ "" ~~ y
T j I I 0 . ·
T I I I ' ' ?
0 0-- 100>
@ @
I
0 I
0 I
0 I
0 1 I
I l _,,,. I I

I I I I
I I I 0
J @ I I
I HS I 0
SffiD a, 5/S
6iD ~
A -' '
v-----------' •- I
I ---- I o-0-0-0 I
r;c.~------,-:: i::-~- o-0-0-0~
I FD- I I ------. 0

I I I O I I
I I I I I I ?
I I I o I o
I ~: rnl,:T,,57 : 6 ,
1e1, -.--; , ,
1 1 : :• ~ jO
I I @: Vf- 4
I I 1!HS1.JQ,1.1I I I

I I I I
E)i '-'' ' ~
I I
I '
I I
I
I '
I '
I I
f @.-
l§ ·,:

G ? • _] A
I
J 1,1 e ,~
P- 2510 P- 2520 P- 2530 P- 2540
MER FEEO PUMP U3R fEEO POMP MER FEED PUUP UBR r-icEO PUMP ( F\ JTU'< E) TK-2500
AERATIO~ TAHK PUMP BA.SN
I
t«M. RIMlt, G rAI. ;; c,. R1N11tG rHL ,~~,~
7 J r----- J
I _______ j
I YFD-2550
JI! t AU. RM i
lv1'D--'2s60
P- 2550 P-2560
Wf, S PUMP WAS POMP
I
20~
VAC/~
F£
tC<!,
2200
F£
200,
fro 'r,l£G.Wik:Ai.. fiiilKENE'. R
1; EOU!PMENT COHTROLS AND
IN51RUl,, l£tH' S SHOWN ON
THIS Pkl.D ARE CONNECTED
TO PLC.

EQUIPMENT CONTROlS
SHOWN FOR USR ftEO
PIJl, IP P-2510 ARE
TmCAL FOR PUMPS
P- 2520, P- 25JO, AND
P- 2540.
2, EOUIPMENT CONTROLS
SHOWN FOR SUBWERS!BlE
WAS PUMP P- 2550 ARE
J'l'P! CAL FOR PUMP
P-2560.
3: FE/ flT 2000 SHAU.

TRANSMIT POSITh't FLOW
ALUES TO PLC.
112\ VENGUtEEIIING, INC.
3240BC'. aminoRe. ilSult!! 150
lmrN!, CA92Ei02
WWW. N'IWENG. COM
o~ o
Zwo,
0: N
Z >- N
Z Ulen
CD~ o
LL.~ 0
o<(z
t::~~
u O>
PROIEaNO
105- 0002
i
I
o._ Wo ~~~ ~
Vl ~
j c3
g
zuz
NZ
D .... <(
m
OillGINAf. 5Hf£ TSl2I
22"X34"

SHEETNUMWI
1--103
AIIEANU'-' 3Ea ....

I ~
if
a.
0 w
a:
m :;;
i
0 1093
i
5 I >
N • l(D
16 0
2 2
5 co "
I ~
N
1'l (/<
0 0 ~
0 CITY OF BANNING
99 E. RAMSEY STREET
BANNING. CA 92220

BANNING WWTP
2242 CHARLES STREET
BANNING, CA 92220

AERATION BLOWERS
j ~
IOJ
o I ,
N
J _..
0 ro o
@J-~~
ffl
STATUS Pl.OT D/\TE,

03. 19. 2024
0 ;
og ~ ~
1- i-~
0 i

1., J_
o i~1_~.r.l
p
p~~ g
ii
1""" <
0 0
I
0 I
0 I
0 I
0 I
0 I
0 I
0 l
Q
1094
rt
00 lo
I
i . I - t'J ! Nifrl~ I J_\!rp ' _ e2 • y;:.

ROM 1.1BR Ah toMJ:EssoR CF-xoo ' 1() - T ~
@
mill LSR eLO'iic.R 1
FROM
I
I
VAC~
ijij
L- 2!00!'
I HS ;
y
L _____ - 4i
r____ ____ TO UER- J2. CO
r----- EJECTOR SYSTEM
L________-.. TO MBR-; 3.JCO
r--£JEClOR SYSTEM
e,-, o~ -~"' EJ-> lCO/ j
I t~ I
L.._,.. TO UER- 3400
EJECTOR mm, f8fo f. l
i ,~ ,: j~, -~ I
I'" I'" 11. I'" ~~~ ' ii ii i~ ' ~ i ,.
l ! ' ,~+
F L
l.!==================='=========.,,, l,j_J
MCT-3110 MCT-3120 MCT-3130 MCT-3140 MCT-3150 ~-""
MeR CARR! DGE TK-3100
MEMBRAIIE. \ IE' SSEl
t.lBR TANKS JI00- 340' 3 INSTRt; UEU( TAG .. UMBERS
DESCRIPTION M3R TA."' I( . 3100 lr.lBR TANK 3200 MBR TANK 3JOO MBR TANK 3400 ( MURE) MER mt. ET FLCWMETER rE/ ffi- 3100 FURT- 3200 F£/ Frr~ 3300 rE/ flT-- 3400 UBR TANK LEVEL TRANSUlITER LE/ IJT- 3100 LE/ UT- 3200 U:/ LIT- 3300 l.E/ Uf- 3400 MBR TANK INLET' COmROL. VALVE FCV- 3101 FCV- 3201 FCV- 330\ FCV- 3401 MBR TANK O~ N VALVF. KV- JI Of l(V- 3201 KV- J30t KV- 3401 Bf- 3106 Ef- 3206 Sf- 3. 306 Bf- 3406
Bf-· 3101 E! f- 3207 '. BF·- 3307 Bf- 3407
CASSETTE tSOtATION VAL\/ ES BF- 3108 BF- 3208 SF- 3. 308 Bf"- 3408 BF- 3109 8F- J209 BF- J.: SC9 BF- 34@
BF- 3110 eF- J210 81"- 3310 BF'- 3410
PERMEATE HEJtOER AfN P. Rv- 3101 ; SRV'- 3102 ARV- 3t03 ARV- 3104 81"- 3101 8F- J20J BF- 3301 EF- 3401
BF- 3102 BF- 3202 SF- 3302 BF- 3402
AIR HE' AOER ! SCLAHON ~ ALVES BF- JtOJ SF,- 3203 BF- 3-' 0l BF- J40J.

BF- 3104 BF- JZ04 BF- 3304 Bf- 3404
BF- 31. 05 SF- 3205 Bf'- 3305 BF- 3405
COMPRESSE' D A. R Hf. AO HANO
BV- 310~ BV- 3201
VtlYE
8' V- 330t 8V- 340t
CONIIPR£ SSED AIR HEA!)
FCV- 3102 FCV- 3202 FOl- 3302 FCV- 3402
SOLEIIIOl'. D V'-1..VE
PrnMO, TE HEAOffi PRESSURE
GA. LICE
Pr-: mm P!- J200 FI- JJOO P!- 3400
PrR\ 1£ ATE HEADER HANO \/ Al. VE: BV- 3102 sv-.' i202 81/- 3302 BV- 3402 ACUUI. I EJE..." TOR EJC- 3100 E.> C- 3200 tJC-=o EJC- 340C fmiFJi. i Pt!iMEATE~ A.'lK
I .

RAS / bRAJN JO AERATIOII TAllK
1 ; P&! D SJiOWN fOR MBR
IESSELT, C- 31001S
T't'f'lCAL FOR VESSa. 5
lK- 3200, Tl<- JJOO, MIO
TK- 34- 00.

N2\ YfNGOO: ERING, lffC.
t::RuLSUitelSO
WWW. N2WENG. COM
t
0 I I I I I I ~
0 IZ
wo _
W N
Z <>: N
I- N
Z V> m
C >-<
CD~ o
t! i
z ~
w~
m"'
Um
PROJECTNO.
105-0002
Io_ WO ,-
wN
I::~
3: V> m
J<
U
0 ZIZ
zuz
NZ
m~a3
N
OiUGl!'.. ALSHEE. TSfZE
22"X34"
S' ifETtlUM89t
1- 105
AREANUMBE! t -
N
oi ~ ~
a
Jl
a::
w
a::
0 iii
w
z
C
a::

ID ::;;
w ::;;
1095
FROM ciffitc ACID bOSINC SYSTEM
P.0M. ! ti0i01,i HYP01DOSING S1' SID. I
f".E'l @. ~ o_@ ~ ! ~~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~
i I ~~

I I I I
l : El : ' ' J1~ ~ PS ~ 1102
I
s l
OESCRPT! ON
TUP. PRESSURE TRANSMITTER

PRESSURE SWITCH ,
PRESSURE SNITCH 2
PERLlEATt SUCTlOH lSO., ATION
V' 4.VE
PERMCATt PUUP INl.£ 1'
PRESSURE INO! CATOR
PERMEATE PUMP lliLEr
PRfSSURE SWITCl-'
FEARMEATE P> JMP OISC!- V. RGE
PRESSURE SWTTC!- i<
PERMEATE PUMP DISC1Wl: GE
PRESSURE 1-', i"OJCATOR
PERMEATE MAG FLO# i.lET£ R
PERMEi\ TE FUMP IN:.. Er SWPLE
V"- VE
PEFiMEAlE PUl.' P OISO- W. CE
SAMPlE VAi. VE
PERMEATE PUMP OISCHAAGf

ISOLATIOII WLVE
T' JRBIOUE" fER HUH \ SOlAT. ON
VAlV!'.

T\ JRE! lDUElEH IHI. J,. l SOI. DiOID
VAl. VE
TURB10M~ INLET CHO: K
VAl\" E
y_,,
PCRWEATT: PUUP EQIJlPUE-' lT/ INSTRUMOff TAG NUI. IBERS PERMEATt P1Jl6' J1CO PERMEATE P, JMP 3200 PERMEATE PUMP 3300 PE/PIT 3100 PE/ PIT 3200 PE/ PITl300
PSl-'- J101A PSH-. 3201A PSH- 3301A
PSH- 31019 PSH- 32018 PSH- 3: 5016
fV-. 5J( U
Pl- 3! 02 Pl- 3202 Pl- l302
PSt!-. 3102" f>Sl- l-J202A P5H-. 3302A
PSH- 3' 028 PSH-. 32028 PSH- 33026
PI- J10J Pl- 3203
i
Pl- 3303
fl:/ nT- 3100 n:;m-. 1200 fE/ ffi- 3300
av-. 11oa BV- JWB av- JJCa
01/·- J' l10 8' 1-. 3210 BY-.!. 310
BV- J111 BV- 3211 BV- JJt1
BV- 3111 8'.-- 3211 l:N- 3311
fV-. 3102 FV- 3202 FV- JJ02
CV- 3105- CV- 3205 CV- 3305
KV- 3102 l<V- 3202 i<V- 3302
ri!~~ iitiiiiJiocsfuio .. --;
r------ i-----+'---, 0- 0--- i TO MBR PlC ~ ,:

VF0- 3100 Fl 11
4--i-----~ " 00 ~ ~
l @ I I t
6 , l ''°' _ t1 =.~. {;;~)
b~~J @ VA~ csrART- UP ONLY}
T - i 1
i
l
I
I
l
i
1I
J.

I
t
I
T
I
PE~ P-3100P _., KS
Y- N ~ f

PERMEATE PUMP J OO MURE
PE/ PIT J4CO
PSH- 34- 0lA
Stt- 34016
Fl- 3402
PSH- 3402"
PSH- 34028
Fl- 3403
FE/ nT- 3400
408
N-·. 3410
BV- 3411
g..,- 3411
FV- 3402
C¥- 3405
V- 340. 2
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
1 qi .

J~
J ~
m/~ PERMEATE PUMPS
P- 3200/ P- 3J00/ P- J400

NOT SHOYIN)
r: RNN
lURBIOMD' ER 1-1,,!.NO CONTROL
VAl. VE ____
J ---
nJRBIOMETER AE/ AIJ- 3100 AE./ A! T- 3200 M:/ AIT- 3. 300 I I
AfT- 3400
I
I
G£ Nf! W. NOT£ S
1; EQUlPMENT CONTROlS AN
tNSTRUMEHTS SI- IOWN ON
TiilS P& ID ARE CONt.' ECTED
TO MBR VENDOR PLC.
2: EQUIPMENT CONfflOt.. S AND

INSTRUMOITS SHOWN FOR
PERMEATE PUMP P- 3100
AAE l'l'PICAL FOR
PERMEATE PUMPS P- 3200,
P- 3300, NW P- 3400.

J: EOUiPMENT CONTROLS.

INSIRUIJEHTS. ANO VALVES
SliOWN ON THIS P&: 10 ARE
FURNIShl: O 8' I' t.lBR
VENDOR.
4: PERMEATE POMP
VfD- 3100, Vft>- 3200.

VF0- 3. 300, AND VFD- J- 400
ARE TO BE f\JRNISHED BV
lNTRACTOR.

S: fE/ flT 3100- 3400 SHAU.

TRANSJArl POSITM: flOW
VALVES TO PLC.

N2W EMGINEERING, INC.
i:: Rlla~ SlitelSO
WWW. N2WENG. COM
i
ii
0 ti
I I I I I I I ~
g
L.?,_ ,_
Z
wo o_ WO _
WN ~~~ ·~~~ ~
Ula,
C/l <(
D ~(.) 0'::'.:: fu
d
ZIZ
t. J~
z 0 z
NZ
I-""' CD .,.<(
a> ID r-, ID
u a, "'
PflOJECl" NO,
105-0002
O:'UGl:- JAt. SHU: fSIZE
22"X34•
SHEfrNUMlla<
AR= AnUM9ER -
8N
i
a •
13 : g
I
en
a. ::;;
a.

UJ ~ ::;;
a:

UJ
a.
a:
m ::;;
1096
Ii
UI id·
5 u
t OJ
I ~ ~
m 0
5 0
d
j

CITY OF BANNING
99 E. RAMSEY STREET
BANNING, CA 92220

BANNING WWTP
2212 CHARLES STREET
BANNING, C/1 92220

MBRBLOWERS
m laJ ~ I
0 (.,; ~
h)
ID 0
io
@~~
ffl
0 STATIJS· PLOTtlATI;

03. 19. 2024
0 I
0 I
0 I
0 I
0 I
0 I
0 I
0 J.
1097
or-~~
g ~ CITY OF BANNING
I i ~.!.:. ~~ 9~' _____ 9_9_E_. _RA-.M-SE_Y_s_r_RE-ET ___ ------- 1 :::; ~ ~ BANNING, CA 92220 BANNll~ G WWTP
22/ 42 CHARLES S1REET
BANNING, CA 92220
a

MBR PERMEATE TANKS
DES: GNEDSY l's O!VIWMBY: rt. CHEO: fDIIY: JW /\??~ OVEOBY JW STATUS PlOTOA. TE.

03. 19. 2024
1098
J J :,;I CITY OF BANNING
I --"'• "'" 99 E. RAMSEY STREET
I iil ~ ~ ji ~~ BANNING, CA 92220
1 ~

BANNING WWTP
2242 CHARLES STREET
BANNING, CA 92220

PLANT AIR COMPRESSORS
I
I
t
I !
I': y
I I
I : tr
I I : •" ~
I I 8 ®---
r ij~
I
I
J
REV. DATE Ol: SCRIPHON
DUIONEO 11' 1'> F~ OAAWN BY: Tl CttEO: EO IIY: JW APPROVUI BY. JW TATU~ PLOT DAT£:

03.19.2024
1099
ro orsn,
I
I
m~ c½) !!!!®
Y"'Y"'Y"'Y":

L--- L--... l---. L.--~
WA. Tm PUM? S
HOA~ IN / S'' 4100 .~ i
4100 4100
s L--- y-• 001E-' 1
LD---<:;,>--- 1
1-2oor~--
PSH __.... V l
I
HEX- 4100
HE,\ T EXCHANGER
f
@\ : §_~
yl\yl 191-_ y ~
L ___ r __ _
P- 4200

RECIRCULATION PUMP
I
P- 4100
SW REClRCULATION PUMP
SW
I.

TK-4100
PRIMARY DIGESTER ( EXlSTif.. G)
t
DRYiNG BEDS
o ·;:J,,nc stuool Mrxi~ PUMPS
1 : Pl; UP CONTROI.. S ME I HlW ENG! NttfUNG, INC.

TYPIC'. At. FOR P- 4100 ANO . 3240EICamffKIRNI. SUite- 150 P- 4200. --- Jrvine,_ CA9M02.

WWW. HlWENG. OOM
Ot:io
ZwN
0: N
Z.- N
zll}a,
m~ u
LL'.:!. ci
o~~
z
W~
mm
Um
Pf! OJECTt. O
105- 0002
Ii
I
Ii
ii ~
LWO
1- WN
e: N
3: (/) ~
u
g
zuz
NZ
m..,."'
N ( II
N
OiUGlt. Al. SH: f.E:TSlZE
2rX34·
SliEETNUMeER
1-110
AREANUMa! ER -
8 N
0 I
a:

Cl
B
1100
MOO ! 0 "' - @51(12
ZLC @1-iS
ll10Q' ~ 101
@/ YAf.
5101

STATION
NJ SYSTE\ I
LOCATED AT VALVE ACTUAfCR
y
I
I
I
fzso\ ~
1'zsc\ ~
Ys\
4! 30 VAC
LCP- 5200
I
1 1
I
I
I
I I I
I TK-5200 1 1
I -- 1,.;'.

L ___________ ~ u; rmN r~ il~
I I.:
y
I
I
TO EQ BAS! N
@
I • t · I
IHOMAS
PUMP iTAJIW' j ht ••
SHi- 5100 ~

CHEMPL P,
INJECTION RING ~ 100
I
I
@/ "' ,,~
I '
I
I
I '
I
I
I
I
I
I ____________
J
I
I
I
I.\!
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
L ____ " t
P- 5100
I
I
I
r,; 1cKOEO SlUDGE P\ JUP
I
120~
VP. C/-~
rt)
NlWEt« ilNEERING, lffC.
3240ElCilm! r, oReitSUitelSO
rvtne. CA. 92602
WWW. N:Z,.'IENG. coM
ti 0
ZwN
z ~ fj
z < I)"'
rowu
V>
u..~ d
o~~
z
W~
O' ll'.D
Um
PROJF. CTt.: O
105-0002
I
I~
I~
i
l_ w 0
f- w N
5' ff N
3: fll ~
C) ~ c3
i~g
z 0 z
NZ
ro ~""
N< Il
N
0:UGlNALSHEETSIZE
22"X34"
S> lilltlUM! l£R
1-111
AAEANUt. 4~fll.
a::
w
z
w :,,:
u
z
I
fi:l ::.

N
ai ...
1101
i: : i!
I ,.
0 ~ i
al ~~
l!i
@Ei

CITY OF BANNING
99 E. RAMSEY STREET
BANNING, CA 92220

BANNING WWTP
2242 CHARLES STREET
BANNING, CA 92220

CATIONIC POLYMER DOSING SYSTEM
I{}
fiI,:...:=-""
II.EV. OAtl OESCRlPllON
OESIGNEOBV: fL DRAWN BY, Fl CHECKED bl'; JW APPRovro BY JW STATUS· PLOTOATE;

03. 19. 2024
1102
11:1~-~-=
i8:
7 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ... ----------~~----------- t • ~---------------- y ~ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
rr1I
41 :
1 ~---~ ~--\
El· t_?.J.1 ;
o "
r •
l ' . .. ..

J ~~ CITY OF BANNING :
i~ fi1,. 99 E. RAMSEY STREET
o BANNING, CA 92220
N f--------8-A_N_N_IN_G_W_W_TP------ l
2242 CHARLES STREET
BANNING, CA 92220

CITRIC ACID DOSING SYSTEM
I
1C)~i ~,
I
I
I
I
I
L,,-;,;i I
i~.....,. : ~
i~ -~
i.

REV. DATE Ol: SCRIPTION
D61G~ tDBY. Fl DRAWNBY: ( L Cll: ECKEOllr, JW APPIIOVEOBY. IW STATUS< PLOTOA1?,

03. 19. 2024 1103
I ,. " ~I
e
m ~~
I
I
11- av~-,=-- i:.... ___________ ...:.. o ..
r------
1 I
J -----------' ---+ 71 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I .._ ___ ,.,.; !
11~ ~ ------__ _ J
601 ~
1' 8 ~ :

I
I
I
I
I
I
I : .,..,._, ---------------
7 t=li
1,,.-;; i I
Mi l
t-®---~
lei

CITY OF BANNING
99 E. RAMSEY STREET
BANNING, CA 92220

BANNING WWTP
2242 CHARLES STREET
BANNING, CA 92220

SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE DOSING SYSTEM
1 1 ~ I u
l)l~-------
1 j
8------r--
I
I
I
I
I
L.---------
REV. DAIE DESCRIPTION
OES! GNU, BY: FL ORAWU IIV: rL CHEO:: EO BY: JW APPROVEO BY JW STATUS: PLOTDATh

03.19.2024
1104
i
t
i,
h
1 ii
tt ... · 1
8F- 1000
T
V' . 0@-fffl
I ""'•
i i ~
21-.< ! I
ii;:! ij" !
1 ! ;
I ~ I '"-.,
i § n '-" §
o 0
o & ~
ii
i i
I
11 i ~
i
C\ QQ Q ij~ ---,
F,. 1:! I
I
11 r--------------!
W -: _______ ------ I fr-~ I -: -- @"" ~
I i I i I
ii f-(f)i1'
t~I
b, l~-~
IJ~ -: ~~. i i: ~ ~: ~
o r~T-cIBJ~rooi1 J.
1·
L ; /
ij I
I !~ I
L~-~
r
i .
r ' '
I
i"'
I

CITY OF BANNING
ii ~ ~! ; I
99 E. RAMSEY STREET
BANNING, CA 92220 \
ti9 ' ~
BANNING WWTP H:H
2242 CHARLES STREET JIEV, DATE orn.' IIIPllON ~~~,
BANNING, CA 92220 OESIGNEOBY, rL DAAWNBY. FL CH£ CK£ 0BY: JW APPROVE08Y; rN m!h i ~ j!i
STATUS! ? l.OTOATE: ~.

CHLORINE CONTACT TANKS I"

03.19.2024 ~
1105
Exhibit B
Scope of Work and Schedule
AECOM
W...M._.LYLES CO.
a il•1 nt venr u 1c ----------
City of Banning CA
Proposal sub mitted to
C ity of Ba nn ing
December 2024
Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades
Project
Progressive Design- Build Serv ices, Phase 1 Scope of Work 1106
A:COM WM . LYLES CO.
a .,.:,,,, it:Hntl. t
Table of Contents
Introduction
Ba ckground
Project Description
City of Banning
Prog res sive Design- Bu Id Sel' Vlces
Wastewate r Treatmen t Plant and R ecycled
Water Upgrades ProJsct
Pllase 1 Seo~ ofWork (FINAL)
Progressive Des ign Build Approach Implementation ................................................................ 1 Phase 1 - Sco pe of Wo rk
Task 1 - Design
Sub Task 1.1 - Preliminary Des ign
Sub Ta sk 1.2 - 30 Percent Des ign
Sub Task 1.3 - 60 Per cent Design
Sub Ta sk 1.4 - Hydrauli c Profile Modeling
Sub Ta sk 1. 5- Final Design
Task 2 - Cost Estimating .

Sub Ta sk 2.1. - Initial Baseline Cos t Mode l and Updates ....

Sub Ta sk 2.2. - GMP Development
Task 3 - Meetings & Reports ...

Sub Ta sk 3. 1 - Kick- off Meeting/ Workshop ..

Sub Ta sk 3.2 - Progress Meetings and Reports ..

Sub Ta sk 3.3 - Project Status Reports & Month ly Invoices Sub Ta sk 3.4 - Risk Management Workshop ..

Sub Ta sk 3.5 - Con structability Review Workshops
Sub Ta sk 3.6 - SCADA Development and Scoping Workshops Task 4 - Pre liminary Investigations & Support.

Sub Task 4.1 - Potho ling ..

Sub Task 4.2 - Topographic
Sub Ta sk 4.3 - Environmenta l Support
Sub Ta sk 4.4 - Geote chnical Investigation .....

Sub Ta sk 4.5 - Permitting Support ..

Sub Ta sk 4.6 - Energy Tax Credits / Incentives ......

Scope Clarifications. Assumptions , and Exclusions
5 5
6 6
6 7
7 8
9 9
9 10
11 11
11 12
13 14
15 16
A:"" COM W. M.. LYLES CO.
0 ' 11t..- nt1Jte
Introduction
City of Banning
Progressive Desigrr- Build Services
Wastewater Treatment Pla nt and Recyded
Wa ter Upgrades Project
Phase 1Scope of Work (FINAL)
As requested by the City of Ban ning ( City). AECOM/ W. M. LYLES JOINT VEN TURE ( AECOM/ WML ) has developed a scope of services and preliminary sched ule for Phase 1 of the progressi ve design- bu ild servi ces for the Wastewater Treatment Plant and Re cycled Water Upgrades Project ( Project).

Background
The City of Banning is responsib le for the co ll ection. conveyance, trea tm ent, and disposal of wastewat er generated Wlthin its service area. The loca l co llector sewers discharge in to larger sewer trunk mains , then to the Banning WWTP . loca ted in the southeas t corner of the City.

The existing WWTP has a current capacity of 3.6 million gallons per day ( MGD) and is designed to treat wastew ater to secondary standards. The WWTP consists of pre liminary treatment, primary tre atment , secondary trea tm ent. solids hand ling , disinfection ( cu rrently not in use ), and evaporation/ perco lation ponds. The prel iminary treatmen t system consists of a mechanica l bar screen , compactor , grit remova l system , and cyclone separator.

Effluent from the pre liminary treatment system is gravity fed to two primary clarifiers. Primary effluent is pumped lo two Tri ckling Fillers, each ra ted for 1.8 MGD. Th e Trickling Fi lter effluent is sen I lo two secondary clarifiers.

Secondary effluent flows through a ch lorine contact chamber and is then discharged to 10 unlined evaporation/ pe rco lat ion pon ds which recharges the Cabazon Groundwater Basin . This recharge is provided only through suriace perco lation. and no inj ection we lls are used by the City.

Primary and secondary sludge is pro cessed via two primary anaerobic digesters. A second- stage digester is currently use d as a sludge ho lding lank befo re thickened sludge is sent lo the sl udge drying beds. Sludge is allowed to dry and then is hau led offsite for fina l disposal. A gravity thickener was used to thicken secondary sludge but is cu rrently not in service.

At th is time , effl uent from the WWTP is in comp liance wi th effluent water quality discharge requiremen ts.

However, the WWTP wi ll not be ab le to mee t the impending discharge limits proposed by the Co lorado Ri ver Basin Regiona l Water Quality Control Boad ( RWOCB ). In addition. many treatmen t facilities at the plant. including the two Tri ckl ing Filters , ha ve reached the end of the ir useful life.

Project Description
The Proj ect involves upgrading the Banning WWTP to TiUe 22 standa rds for recycled water use.

The existi ng Trick ling Fi lters and se condary clarifiers will be aba ndoned, and a new MBR facility and UV disinfe ction system wi ll be installed to meet Titl e 22 recycled wa ter standards. Other miscell aneous upgrades of the ' MNTP , including fine screening upstream of the aeration tanks , modifications to digester faci lities , dewatering , chem ica l systems. and anci llary facil ities ( offi ce, electrica l and control systems including new SCADA, plan t water, potable water, storrnwater, etc.) will also be imp lemented as part of the projec t. An RO system and associated evaporations ponds may be needed as we ll and is included in this scope of services, if confi rmed.

Progressive Design Build Approach Implementation
In accordance with th e RFP , AECOM/ WML proposes to implement th e projec t on a progressive design- build basis. Thi s approach invo lves bringing design and const ru cti on resou rces to gether in an integra ted team to 1107
A:COM W. M. LYLES CO.
piftt. w-ef\U..- 1
City of Banning
Progressive Design- Build Servtces
Wastewater Treatm ent Plant and Recycled
Water Upgrades Project
Phase 1 Scope of Work ( FIN~ Ll
manage the proj ect in a competi tive manner bu t wi th a sing le source of responsib ility and accountabi lit y. This approach is broken down into lwo disti nct phases:

Phase 1 Serv ices - Planning , Des ign Development , Permitting and Preparation of the Design- Build Price.

This phase includes all the plan ning, eng ineering , and permitting to prepare a complete design to develop a Gua ranteed Maximum Price ( GMP) and schedule for Phase 2.

Phase 2 Services- Project Execution. Upo n agreement on the GMP for the project and the rele ase of required approvals , AECOM/ WML wi ll proce ed with Phase 2 for equipment and material procu rem ent, construction, engineering design support during construction, constru ction management, start•up , and acceptance testing.

Phase 1 - Scope of Work
AECOM/ WML will provid e Phase 1 eng ineering services including the preparation of a Pre lim inary Design Report PDR) and a complete design to develop the Phase 2 Proposal, including a GMP for the construction or the Projec l.

The scope of work for Phase 1 has been organized into four interre lated tasks as fo llows :

Task 1- Design
Task 2- Cost Estimating
Ta sk 3- Mee tings & Repo rts
Task 4 - Investigations / Support
A deta iled description of these tas ks is pro vided in the fo llowing subsections.

Task 1 - Design
Sub Task 1.1 - Pre liminary Desig n Report
Objective: Further develop design concepts and forma lly document project scope and rationale in a Preliminary Design Report ( PDR).

AECOMIWML Actlvlt/ es : Prepare a PDR incorp orating the re su lts of kick- off and prog ress meetings, techn ical collaboration sess ions. and workshops with the City conducted to date. A draft PDR will document thes e results and describe the proposed scope of work for new faci lities. The final PDR wi ll document lhe ra tionale for all design decisions and will present the initia l scope or work for design and GMP developmenl.

The PDR for the WWTP will define the overall project goals and design intent and the detai led design criteria for all project components , systems and subsystems such as :

Design criteria for flows and loads.

Anticipated unit process flow rates and chemica l use and storage requiremen ts.

Wastewater treatment process design, including mass balances , equipment capacities and related design criteria.

Geotechnical data and design criteria ( Geotechn ical Report).

Base Map from topographic survey.

Civil concepts and design criteria. Includ ing faci lities plann ing in regard to location and orient ation of proposed faci lities and re lation to existing facilities and hydrau lic profile .

A:COM W. M. LYLES CO.

I JICMl, venl ur•
Foundation, structural and architectural concepts and design criteria .

Archite ctural co ncepts and design criteri a.

Process mechanical concepts and design criteria.

HVA C concepts and design criteria.

Plum bing concepts and design cri teria.

Fire protection design criteria.

City of Banning
Progressive Design- Build Services
Wastewater Treatment Pla nt and Recycled
Water Upgrades Project
Phase 1 Scope of Work ( FINAL}
SCADA system architecture and ouUine process control descriptions for critical unit operations and draft P&IDs.

Ph ysica l and elect ronic security/ surveillance systems .

Electrical power supply and distribution strategy.

Permitting requirements.

Potholing/ utility searches
Deliverables:

Draft PDR including Geotechnical Report and Base map .

Updated List of drawings and specifications
Pre lim inary drawings inc luding process flow diagrams, hydraulic profil e, mass balan ces, conceptua l site plans; major process gen era l arrangement plans and secti ons ( fine screens , MBR , UV disinfection, dewateri ng );
Fina l PDR incorporating City commen ts .

Deliverables will be provided in electron ic form at (PDF ) Key Understanding: The main purpose of preparing the draft PDR is to further develop the design while forma lly documenting projec t scope and rati onale. This document will provide the basis for the Initial Cost Base line.

Drawings fo r all des ign phases will be prepared with AutoCAD or Revit, and in accordance with the United States Nationa l CAD Standard® ( NCS). Design plans will be developed util izing industry standard scales , in English ( not me tric) engineering units. Attachment A ( Draft Index of Drawings and Specification s) shows a list of drawings and specifications anti cipated for the Proj ect and at what stage they wi ll be provi ded .

Specifications for all design phases will be prepared in Microsoft Word using the industry standard.

AECOM/ WM L's budget for th is task assumes no Division Oand Di vis io n 1 specific ations will be requ ired to be prepared by AECOM/ WML, and that AECOM/ WML' s Design- Build specifi cations ( 16 Divisions format) will be used as a basis for the technical provisions.

Meetings/ Travel: Refer to Task 3 - Meetings and Rep orts for planned meetings and workshops. Ad-hoc calls may be needed to coordinate and discuss emerging technical issues.

Information and Services Provided by Others: As-builts of existing faci lities, available geotechnica l reports and data , City' s input on the design concepts and alternatives. City to provide comments in spreadsheet for tracking and disposition purposes.

City' s operations staff to provide add itional sampling and sample analysis as part of routi ne month ly efforts and as may be needed by MBR and RO equipment manufacturers to size their equipment and provide performance warranties.

Sub Task 1.2- 30 Percent Design Phase
Objective: Preparation or 30 Percent Design.

AECOMIWML Actwities: Develop initia l discipline design drawings and specifications for City review. A preliminary lisl of the antic ipated drawings and specifications included in lhis submittal is detai led in the Draft 1108
A:COM W. M. LYLES CO .
o,. l\tvent .....

City of Banning
Progressive Design- Build Serv ices
Wastewater Treatm ent Plant and Recycled
Water Upgrades Project
Phase 1 Scope of Work ( FINAL)
Ind ex of Drawing Lisi and Specificalions included in Appendix A. The proposed number of drawing s and level of details in each drawing are consistenl wilh a 30 percenl design level.

Deliverables:
30 percent Design drawings and major equipment specifications and draft hydraulic profile Deli verables will be provided in electronic forma t (PDF) Key Understanding : The main purpose of the 30 percent design package is to incorporate design requirements and develop the design suffi cie ntly so ! hat a cost es limale can be prepared. The 30 percenl design will set the stage for subsequenl design phases and development of the GMP and will be the basis for the Cost Update No.

1. The overa ll scope for lhe Projecl will be fixed after the City commenls on the 30 percent design are addre ssed .

Meetings/ Travel: Refer to Task 3 - Meetings and Reports for planned meetings and workshops.

Information and Services Provided by Others: Ci ty's inp ut on PDR and technical collaboration sessions. City lo provide comments in spreads heet for tracking and dispos ition purposes.

Sub Task 1.3 - 60 Percent Design Phase
Objective: Preparation of 60 Percenl Design.

AECOMIWML Activities:

Advance individual disciplines design for City review. A preliminary list of the anticipated drawings and specificalions is inc luded in lhis submillal is detailed in the Drafl List of Drawing List and Specifications inc luded in Appendix A. The proposed number of drawings and level of details in each drawing are consistent with a 60 percent design leve l.

Finalize 60 percent design package and update cost estimate based on City comments.

Deliverables:
60 percent Design drawings and specifications and fina l hydraulic profile calculatio ns.

Deliverables will be prov ided in electronic forma t (PD F) Key Understanding : The main purpose of the 60 percent design package is lo progress the d evelop the design from the 30 percent design package sufficien tly to develop the Draft GMP and ultimately lhe Final GMP as well as setting lhe stage for lhe fina l design package.

Included in the 60 percenl design will be markups of as-bu ilt drawings and specifications developed fo r in-kind replacement of the equipme nl listed below to include in the GMP . No drawings will be developed for the replacement of equipment and conslruction will be performed from lhe shop drawings suppli ed by the equipment suppliers :

Upgrade Ferric Su lfale Feed/ Slorage Syslem
Digester Coa ting
Replace Piping in Grit Chamber
Replace East Primary Clarifier Center Drive
Repla ce Existing PVC Digesler Gas Pip ing
A:COM W. M. LYLES CO.
a p.. t1t ... ., rur. ------
Replace Digester Hot Water Boiler
Replace Grit/ Cyclone Unit
Replace Two Ol d Gril Pumps
City of Banning
Progressive Desigr.- Bu~d Services
Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled
Water Upgrades Project
Phase 1 Scope of Worl< ( FINAL)
Title 24 analysis to comply wilh CalGreen regulations is included and wi ll be provided after the 60 perce nl design rev iew is provided by the City.

Meetlngsfrravel: Refer to Task 3 - Meetings and Reports for planned meetings and workshops.

Information and Services Provided by Others: City" s input from review of the 30 Perce nt Desig n and technical collaboration sessions. City to provide com menls in spreadsheet for tracking and disposition purposes.

Sub Task 1. 4- Hydraulic Profile Modeling
Objective: For lhe selected process configuralio n, deve lop and revise hydraulic profile for the proposed facili ty expa nsi on.

AECOM/ WML Activities: Use exisling drawings and conceptual design information on the proposed expansion to develop a hydraulic model of lhe new and exisling infrastructure. Model to be developed in AECOM ' s plant hydraulic profile ( PHP) prog ram.

Deliverables: None. All informalion collecled in lhis ! ask will be incorporaled inlo lhe PDR and design drawings.

Key Understanding: The goal of the modeling will be to minim ize inter- process pumping after, as well as set elevations of major new fac ilities.

Meelingsfrravel: None .

Information and Services Provided by Others: City to prov ide any hydraulic profile information for the existing plant includ ing lhe condition of exist ing pipelines or facilily modificalions. City to provide comments in spreadsheet fo r tracking and disposition purposes.

Sub Task 1.5- Final Design Phase
Objective: Preparalion of Final Desig n to Issue for Construction pending Phase 2 notice to proceed.

AECOM/ WML Activities:

Address th e City comments on the complete design provided in the 60 Percent Design Sub mittal and provide a Final Design for the Project A preliminary lisl of lhe anticipated drawings and specificalions included in this submillal is detailed in lhe Drafl List of Drawing List and Specifications in Append ix A. Proposed number of drawings and level of details in each drawing are consistent with a Final Design ready to be issued for construction.

Deliverables:

Fina l Design ( Sea led and Signed by Eng inee r-of- Reco rd for each discipline ) drawings and specifications .

Deliverables will be provided in electronic fo rmat ( PDF).

Key Understanding: The Final Design wi ll be lhe basis for the fin al cost updale ( Cost Update No . 4). The Final Design package will sel the stag e for the preparation of lhe GMP submittal and lhe overa ll scope for Ph ase 2 of lh is Project Any mod ifications by lhe City lo lhis design will be handled as design change notices in Phase 2. 1109
A:COM W. M. LYLES CO.
lpffl.- fflh. tl
City of Banning
PrOIJre. ssive Design- Build SeMCes
Wastewater Treatm ent Plant and Recyclad
Water Upgrades Project
Phase 1 Scope of Work ( FlN" L)
Meetings/ Travel: Refer to Task 3 - Meetings and Reports for planned meetings and worl< shops. lnfonnatlon and Services Provided by Others: City' s input on 60 percent design packages. City to provide comments in spreadsheet for tracking and disposition purposes.

Task 2 - Cost Estimating
Sub Task 2.1. - Initial Baseline Cost Model and Updates Objective: Preparation of initia l baseline cost model and one cost update and draft and final GMP.

AECOMIWML Activities: Provide cost estimates tracking different stages of design as follows:

In itial Baseline Cost Estimate - After submittal of Draft PDR Report Cost Update No. 1 -After 30% Design Submittal
Draft GMP - After 60% Design Submitta l
Fina l GMP - After Draft GMP Subm ittal and reco nciliation of 60% Design Submittal comments Deliverables:

In itia l Baseline Cost Estimate , Cost Update, Draft GMP, and Fi nal GMP .

Initia l Draft Phase 2 CPM Schedule , Schedule Update , Draft Phase 2 Baseline Schedule, and Final Phase 2 Baseline Schedule
Deliverables will be provided in electron ic format ( PDF).

Key Understanding : The ma in purpose of the baseline cost estimate is to incorporate confi rmation of concept design and establish the format and base for cost updates through design develop ment. The baseline cost estimate and subsequent cost updates will set the stage for development of the GMP. Thi s will allow the City and AECOM/ WML to ensure the Project is being designed to budget.

Meetings/ Travel: Virtual meetings will be held to present the In itial Baseline Cost Estimate and up to fou r Cost Updates. These meetings will be held as part of the technical collaboration portion of the Project Prog ress Meetings.
lnfonnallon and Services Provided by Others: City' s inp ut on design concepts and input on potential value engi neering ideas.

Sub Task 2.2 . - GMP Development
Objactive: Comp lete a Phase 2 proposal including development of a guaranteed maximum price ( G MP) based on a combination of competitive bidding and self- performing construction work based on final des ig n documents.

AECOMIWML Activities: Using the Phase 1 work products , the AECOM/ WML team will obtain pricing for equipment and materials and solicit bids for construction of the proposed project. The AECOM/ WML will then prepare and submit a detailed Phase 2 proposal for City re view. The Phase 2 Proposal will detail all the necessary services for permitting , eq uipme nt and materia ls procurement , physical construction of th e Project, engineering design support during cons truction, construction management, quality control activities, start- up, comm issio ning and acceptance testing , O&M manual and record drawings , traini ng and any additional contracted A:-coM W. M. LYLES CO.

IJQ" 1:...,. tU" I
City of Banning
Progressive Design-- Bu~ d SeMCes
Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recyded
Water Upgrades Project
Phase 1 Scope of Work IFIN, J,L)
services for the duration of the Project. It shall contain a construction schedule , Substantial and Final Completion dates . and a Startup , Commissioning and Acce pta nce Testing Plan.

Alternative approaches and materials of construction will be evaluated using bidding or through in- house cost esti mates and fina l recommendations will be made to the City. After com pletion of bidd ing and pricing efforts , the Phase 2 proposal will be updated lo summarize a description of the recommended project approach and the details of the GMP estimate.

Deliverables : Phase 2 proposal ( Draft and Final ) documenting the desig n-bu ild project scope of worl<, design drawings and detailed cost estima te including the following :

Contract amendment ( general conditio ns)
Fina l design includ ing drawings and specifications.

GMP, including recommended Des ign- Bu ilder continge ncy, process guarantee , assumptions, clarifications. and exceptions .

Org Chart for Phase 2
Phase 2 schedu le
Draft Quality Management Plan
Draft Startup, Commissioning and Tra in ing Plan ( Final needs to be done in Phase 2 in coord ination with vendors)
Risk Register
Key Understanding: The AECOM/ WML team will provide GMP fo r the project using an open book bidd ing process. Certain portions of the work such as concrete work, insta llation of process equipment and process piping will be self-performed by the AECOM/ WML team. Items such as unforeseen site conditions and scope additions are not to be carried in the Design -Builde r con tingency and should be managed as change orders.

AECOM/ WML will provide a Draft Phase 2 Proposal fo llowed by a Final Phase 2 Proposal incorporating the resu lts and agreements of the negotiations with the City.

Meellngs/ Travel: One full day meeting to review draft Phase 2 Proposal Information and Services Provided by Others: Input from City on draft Phase 2 Proposal.

Task 3 - Meetings & Reports
Sub Task 3.1 - Kick- off Meeting/ Workshop
Objective: Discuss project expectatio ns wrth the C ity including project scope and execut ion , roles and responsibilities , quality control, progress reporti ng, schedu le, and deliverables. Review concept design and discuss major unit process treatment that wilt meet the project performance goals.

AECOM/ WML Activities : Prior to the worksh op, AECOM/ WML will prepare an agenda and Power Poi nt prese ntation all the items described in the objective. Also, AECOM/ WML will prepare a data request to gather all information available that can assist in the development of the activities scoped in Ph ase 1. 1110
A:COM W. M. LYLF. 5 CO.
p.l\tl'""l\ofl
City of Banning
Progressive Design- Build Servk; es
Wastewater Treatm ent Plant and Recycled
Water Upgrades Project
Phase 1Scope of Wor1< ( FINAL)
Deliverables: Workshop agenda and data request will be issued at least three days before the meeting. A summary of workshop findings will be issued after the meeting. A Project Quality Plan and Project Execution Plan will be deve loped for discussion in the kick- off meeting.

Key Understanding : The main purpose of the Kick- off / Workshop is to set project espectations and facilitate effective collaboration between the Ci ty and AECOM/ WML and to plan the specifics of the next steps for Phase 1.

Meetings/ Travel: A 4-hou r workshop will be held to kick- off the Project at a location chosen by the Ci ly. The PM , DM , Process Lead, and Preconstruction Manager will attend in person. lnfonnation and Services Provided by Others: City to attend workshop with key staff and provide a venue.

Sub Task 3.2 - Progress Meetings and Reports
Objective: The overall objective of this task is to ensure on- time and on- budget project progression according to the scope , flu id and coordinated communication with City staff, adequate project controls and quality of all deliverables. Included in this task are 16 Progress Meetings. Progress Meetings will be broken down into a Project Management Segment , to discuss overall project progression and issues , followed by a Technica l Collaboration Segment. Technica l Collaboration Segments will be used to discuss specific technical items , such as process options or preferences , or to review design submittals for the different design phases after the City has provided their comments.

The fo llowing Technical Collaboration Segments are included:

MBR and Disinfection Technica l Colla boration
Site Layout Technica l Collaboration
Permilting Technica l Collaboration
Other Emerg ing Topics for Technica l Collaboration
Draft PDR Review
30 Percent Design / VE Review
60 Percent Design Review
100 Percent Design Re view
Progress Meetings and Reports
AECOMIWML Activities: Schedule and conduct 16 Progress Meetings with City and City' s representatives at City offices or by vi deo conference calls.

Deliverables : Meeting agendas prior to each meeting date. Other relevant documents requiring City review prior to the meeting will be submitted in advance.

Key Understanding : Half- day Progress Meetings will be held. It is envisioned that, typically, the Project Management portion of the Progress Meetings will last one hour and will be altended by the DB project manager, design manager and process lead. The Technica l Coll aboration Portion of the Progress Meeting will be attended by the same team members plus add itiona l discipline leads as needed to cover the selected tech nica l item.

Meetings/ Travel: Meetings will be held wi th a combination of in person and video conference calls as needed. lnfonnation and Services Provided by Others: City to attend meetings with key staff to provide inpu t on overall Project progress and performance as well as ensuring that appropriate key technical staff participates in the Technical Collaboration segments.

A:COM W. M. LYLES CO.
a , o. M_..,_
Sub Task 3.3 - Project Status Reports & Monthly Invoices City of Banning
Progressive Design- Bu~d Services
Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recyded
Water Upgrades Project
Phase 1Scope of Work (FINAL)
AECOM/ WML Activities : Prepare monthly invoices in accordance with actual progress and a monthly progress report to accompany each invoice for the previous month' s work. Progress reports will review major work activities and budget and schedule status by task , summarizing work hours by task and job title and person assigned for the invoice peri od, and document progress made during the past mon th , accomplishments, and a look- ahead to the next month' s progress goals. Update Phase 1 schedu le periodica Uy, comparing actual progress to the originally proposed schedu le and identifying any necessary corrective measure s.

Deliverables: PDF of monthly invoices and monthly progress reports.

Meetings/ Travel: None.

Information and Services Provided by Others : None.

Sub Task 3.4 - Risk Management Workshop
AECOMIWML Activities: AECOM/ WML will develop and maintain a risk log. Th e risk log is the key document used in managing risk. The log records risks identified during proposa l and work plan development; workshops, technica l reviews , and monthly project meetings; and through ot her events that occur during th e project. In itia lly the log will be populated wilh generic risks and those captured throug h past experie nce on similar projects. Each identified event is assigned a score based on one of three probability ratings and one of five impact ( cost or schedule) severity ratings. This allows a semi- quantitative approach for prioritizing the various risks and to calculate and assign values for the important risks.

A workshop will be used to discuss this risk register and build conse nsus among stakeholders and as a means to bring the Project together to identify and evaluate potentia l risks.

The workshop will be held after the 30 Percent Design Submitta l and will focus on design and procurement risks , especia lly those areas ind ica ted in the proposal ana lysis. After the risk register is developed , it will be maintained through the end of Phase 1 and submitted as part of the Phase 2 Proposal.

Deliverables : Develop and maintain ris k log. For workshop, PDF of worksh op agenda and risk register w! I be issued before 1he workshop. A summary of workshop findings issued after lhe meeting.

Meetings/ Travel: None.

Information and Services Provided by Others: City' s input on additional risks and valuation of identified risks.

Sub Ta sk 3.5 - Constructablllty Review Workshops
Objective: Conduct conslructabi lity reviews as a tool to plan and sequence the construction and identify potential capita l cost savings for the Project
AECOMIWML Activities:

AECOM/ WML technica l, construction , and operations specialists wi ll perform cons tructability reviews to evaluate construclabil ity and potential for less- costly means of achieving Cily' s project value objectives. The constructab ility re view team will conduct reviews of the 30 Percent and 60 Percent Designs. Findings will be presented in a workshop fonmat to promote collaboration between the Design- build team and City staff. Two workshops are planned.

Deltverables:
1111
A:COM W. M _LYLES CO.
lll ) IOll' ICffnQ.. f
City of Banning
Progressive Design- 8uild Services
Wastewater TreatmentPlant and Recycled
Water Upgrades Project
Phase 1 Scope of Work ( FINAL)
PowerPoinl presentation for each workshop with agenda and conslruclability analysis and results. Meeting minutes after each workshop.

Key Understanding: City lo provide input during workshop on cons tru cta bi lily preferences an d constrains.

Meetings/ Travel: Cons tructability Workshops will be conducted in person or virtu ally. It is anticipated that each workshop wi ll last 2-3 hours.
lnfonnation and Services Provided by Others: City' s input on the constructability information provided.

Sub Task 3.6 -SCADA Development and Scoping Workshops
Objective : Interact wi th City staff to analyze and colla borate on electrical, instrumentation , and SCADA needs for th e Project
AECOM/ WML Activities: Four workshops are planned to discuss electrical , instrumentation, and SCADA needs for the Project.

Pri or to the initial Workshop ( SCADA Workshop No. 1 ), prepare a summary of proposed electrical , instrumentation, and SCADA components ( inclu ding SCADA architecture ) of the Project to be presented during the initial workshop to receive input and ex change ideas with City staff and validate proje ct scope and preferences. This will include input from the City on equ ipme nt preferences, con trols , incl uding automa ted and fail- safe contro l, and any SCADA sys tem hardwa re , softwa re , and programming requirements , including quantily and location of SCADA Human Machine Interfaces { HM ls).

SCADA Wo rk shops No. 2 and 3 will focus on re viewing the conceptu al contro l narratives { control philosophies) developed as part of the design to ensure obtain the City's ag rees with input on the control philosophies being proposed for the different pro cesses.

SCADA Workshop No. 4 will focus on how the input received in the previous workshops were add ressed as well as other topics such as site- wide communications , security, cybersecurity , SCADA screens planning for Phase 2, etc.

Deliverables : PowerPoint presentation fo r each worksh op with agenda and tech nica l con tent. Meeti ng minutes after each workshop.

Key Und& rstanding : These workshops will provide the basis for the electrica l, instrumentation , and SCADA con cepts for design and cost estimate. T he conceptual control narratives developed in the design phase are preliminary in nature and will have to be adjusted during Phas e 2 after the su bmittals for the equ ipment are availab le. However, th ey wi ll have enough information to provide an understanding to the Ci ty how the equipment wi ll be cont roll ed and th eir leve l of automation . Equipment and Instr umentation tagging nomenclature wi ll be established in the first workshop and will adhere by all parties.

Meetings/ Travel: Four SCADA Workshops will be conducted in person or virtu ally. It is anticipated thal each workshop w ill last 4 hours. AECOM/ WML team members, including design manager, preconstruction manager, programming lead. process lead , electrica l lead, and l&C lead , wi ll attend in person or virtu ally.

Information and Services Provided by Others : City to attend workshops with key fa ci lity staff to provide input on electri cal, instrumentation, and SCADA.
10 A:COM W. M. LYLES CO.
ai ,:: i,t"\l:..,.ntw • ------
Task 4 - Preliminary Investigations & Support
Sub Task 4.1 - Potholing
City of Banning
Prog ressive Design-Buikl Services
Wastewa ter Tre atment Pla nt and Recycle d
Water Upgrades Project
Phase 1Scope or Work (FINAL)
AECOMJ\ IIIML Activities : Potholing acti vities will be conducted if necessary to loc ate buried infrast ruc ture, verify as -bu ilt loca tions, and determine utility loca tions throug hout the pr ojec t site.

Deliverables: None. All information co llec ted in this ta sk will be incorporated into the PDR or desi gn drawings Key Understanding: A budget of $ 1Sk is being carried for potholing and ground radar penetration ( GPR) for utility investigation. It is our understanding that th e existing plant and th e area allocated for the new plant does not have any cu ltural significance and no special cu ltura l monitoring provisions are required.

Meetings/ Travel: It is assumed that the fie ld ac tivities associ ated with this task will be conducte d in a period of two days.

Sub Task 4.2 - Topographic Survey
Objective: Provi de a Boundary and Topog raph ic Survey for the WWTP to supplement exis ting available information and fill inf orma tion gaps to assist on further development of concept layout, detail design activities. and const ruction cos t estima tes.

AECOMIWML Activities: Perform boundary and topog raphic survey including the existing WWT P an d are as of the proposed expanded pla nt to th e west of the existing plant as shown in red in the figu re below.

Surveying activities include the following:

Aerial Topographic Su rve y
Field locate and re cover an existing benchmark and estab lish survey datum for the proj ect. Vertical datum sha ll be based on the North America Vertical Datum of 1988 ( N AVD88 ), and Horizontal control will be North American Datu m of 1983 ( N AD 83) State Plan Coordinates , Zone VI.

Set ground control and aeri al targe ts for aerial topographic mapping of the project limits by aerial su bcons ultant.

Fl y ove rall site and process ae ria l imagery and con trol. 11 1112
A.:COM W. M . LYLES CO.
ilpt\t...ntwil ------
City of Banning
Progressive Design- Build Services
Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled
Water Upgrades Project
Phase 1 Scope of Work ( FJNAL)
Map existing ground surface elevations and identify surface features within the project lim its, including curb, gutter, pavement areas. sidewalk , utility appurtenances , structures , fence lines , and other existing visible features for the West and East limits of the project, dep icted in Figure 1.

Provide a 1" = 40' scale digital aerial topographic survey of property with one- foot co ntour, for the project limits.

Title Report
Ob lain and furnis h one Title Report from a title company for APNs : 532- 180- 008 , -009. The Title report will be used to verify lega l ownership. lega l description of the property, along with easements/ encumbrances on the property that may impact the project design and/or property rights.

Boundary Survey
Utilizing th e obtained title report, together with available pub lic records tools, research and compile all appropriate refe rence materia ls pertaining to the prope rty, including referen ce Record Maps , Corner Records , Tie Sheets , Vesting Deeds , Right- of-Way Deeds and Easement Documents.

Perform fie ld survey lo loca le and recover existing survey monuments and establish survey control for the project. Horizonta l control da tum and basis of bearings shall be based on the Ca lifornia Slate Plane Coordinate System . North American Datum of 1983 ( NAD83), Zone VI.

Map existing property lines , easements , right.of-way. and street centerlines. based on public reco rds research data and items noted in the obtained title report.

Prepare a boundary survey to show the existing property lines . easements, righ t-of-way, and street ce nterlines, for APNs: 532- 1 80-008, - 009,
Deliverables:

Digita l co lor orthorectified photo ( 1" = 40' scale).

Electronic PDF & CAD of Ae ria l Topographic Survey from Aerial.

Title Report for APNs: 532- 180- 008 , -009
Electron ic PDF of Boundary Survey , signed & stamped by a Li cen sed Land Surveyor.

AutoCAD fi le with 20 linework for the existing property lines , easements , right- of-wa y, and street centerlines to be used and referenced for design.

Information and Services Provided by Others: City to provide any past survey data, location of historical benchmarks , property survey of newly acqu ired land to the north of the ma in plan t area, right of ways, easements , elc.

Sub Task 4.3 - Environmental Support
Objective: Identify necessary environmental supper! and scope of work to be provi ded as an allowance of 30 ,000.

AECOM/ WML Activities: AECOM/ WM L will support the update of the previous IS - MND ( included as an attachment to the RFP). The City is in the process of updating this IS - MND to include new CEQA and NEPA requirements; the completio n of the update is anticipated in Ql of 2025.

Deliverables: As required to support the updale of lhe IS-MND. It is ant icipa ted that this may inc lude narratives, figures. and other supporting documentation to describe the Project. 12 A:"" COM \' i~ M. LYLES CO.
c' lt_ tw, ------
City of Banning
Progressive Desig~ Build Services
Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycl ed
Water Upgrades Pr0j0ct
Phase 1 Scope of Work ( FINAL)
Key Unders tanding: The City will lead this effort and request support to AECOM/ WML as needed.

Meetings/ Travel: None. Except phone calls as needed as part of the normal communication for the Project.

Information and Services Provided by Others: Preparation of IS-MN D Sub Task 4.4 - Geotechn ical Invest igat ion
Objective: Co llect subsurface info rm atio n to determi ne soil and groundwater condi tions as we ll as corrosivily potential to assist on the deve lopme nt of alternative ana lyses. deta il design activities. and construction cost estimates.

AECOMIWML Activities : The AECOM/ WML team will conduct subsurface investigations to supplement the existing information from the previous investigations at the site. The geotechnica l investigation includes approximate ly 4-acres in the area of the proposed WWTP expa nsion west of the existing WWTP. This ta sk includes the follow ing:

Document Review and Fie ld Preparation
Review avai lab le geotechnical maps and docu m en ts to eva luate the subsurface co nditio ns prior to performing field investigation .

Obta in boring permi ts.

Site reconnaissance
Call Dig Alert and mark ou t borings.

Geotechnica l lnvesti gaUo n
8 borings ( 1 to 100 feet, 5 to 30 feet and 2 to 50')
Install groundwater mon itori ng we ll in the 100' bori ng (This may be changed to a short er boring depend ing on where groun dwater is encounte red
Mud rotary dri lling meth ods fo r two 50' borings and the 100' boring .

Hollow stem auge r drilling methods for oth er bo rings Drum and dispose of cutti ngs for mud rota ry boring s. including analytical testing.

Assumed thin spread other soi l cutt ing s on site.

Laboratory Tes ting
Based on soi l conditions encountered, perform colla pse potential as well as other la b tests, includ ing mo isture and density, grain size distribution, Atterberg limits, corros ion poten tial, and direct shear tests.

Analyses
Perform engineeri ng analyses to eva luate the foundatio n bearing and settlement for the struc tures, latera l loading con ditions. foundation types, groundwa te r and upl ift cond ition s , as appl icable .

Evaluate the seismic conditions base d on the California Building C ode.

Report
Geotechn ical re port wi th resu lts of the fie ld investi gatio n and labo ra tory testing.

Geotechnical engineering recom mendal io ns for the seis m ic des ig n ( code- based parameters), fou ndations , slope stability, and eart hwork for the project.

Deliverables: A draft Geotechnica l Report, includ ing corrosio n ana lysis and mitigations , wi ll be included as appendices in the PDR
Key Understanding: The location and exten t of the field investigalions will be further refined based on revisions lo th e proposed site plan and associated facilities.
13 1113
A:COM W. M. LYLES CO.
p, m\ lfi' Jb, ir
City of BaMing
Progressive Design- 8uild Services
Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled
Water Upgrades Pro; ect
Phase 1Scope olWork (FINAL)
Meetings/ Travel: A represen tative from AECOMIWM L's will trave l to the site to supervise the geotechnical investigations.

Information and Servic es Provided by Others: City to provide any available past geotechnical data , including subsurface investigations and analyses conducted at the site prior to the begin ning of the fie ld investigations.

Sub Task 4.5 - Perm itting Support
Objec tive: Provide support for permit review and issuance, as we ll as compliance and verificat ion, coordinating with regulatory agencies. Develop a plan lo be implemented to tim ely obtain all permits necessary to bu ild and operate the proposed improvements at the WWTP.

AECOM/ WML Activities:

The following agencies have jurisd ic1ion over the Bann ing WWTP in relation to the proposed Project improvements , and the City of Banning will need to coordinate with multi ple agencies regarding the review and approval of permit applications to construct and commission the proposed improvements. Permitting support will inclu de regional, state , and fed era l levels include approvals from and coordination wi th the fo llowing :

City of Banning ( CEOA Lead Agency)
o Community Development
Build ing Permit
n Pub lic Works
Encroachmen t Permit
County of Riverside
o Department of Environmenta l Health
So lid Waste Facility Requirements
o Fire Department - Hazardous Materials Division
Hazardous Materia l Busin ess Plan
California Sta te Wa terboard Region 7: Colorado River
o Stormwater Poll ution Prevention Plan ( SW PP P) Updates - Proposed changes to the faci lity that may affect the existing National Pollution Discharge Elimination System ( NPDE S) General Permit for stormwater discharges associated with industrial activities) requireme nts and/ or stormwater monitoring, the existing SWPPP must be updated.
o Salinity and Nitrogen Techn ical Memora ndum
o Title 22 Engineering Report for the Producti on, Distribution , and Use of Rec ycled Water o Title 27 Permit
South Coast Air Quality Management District
o Authority to Cons truct Permit
o Permi t to Operate
Key Understandin g: AECOM/ WML wi ll provide preliminary prepara tio n of all necessary permit applications and fa cilitation of regulatory agency approval of all permits that are Contractor' s responsibi lity . City will maintain a lead role with the perm itt ing agencies. It is understood that applying and se curing th ese penmits will be part of Phase 2 of th is Project. Includes permitting new backup generator. 14 A:COM W. M. LYLES CO.
a .om,...,t,._,,
Ctty of Banning
Progressive Design- B uild Services
Wastewater Tre atment Plant and Recycled
Water Upgrades Project
Phase 1 Scope of Woric ( FINAL)
MeeUngs/ Travel: AECOM/ WM L permitting lead to attend up to 4 meetings and confere nce call s as needed.

Information and Services Provided by Others: City will sign permi t applicat ions. furnish permit application fees, and attend permi tting coordina tion and re view meetings with re gulatory agencies as necessary. City to prov ide copies of all re leva nt existing permits, plus re levant communication s with permi tting agencies . City staff or consu ltant wi ll assist in timely contacting reg ul atory agencies lo gather information to prepare schedu le and actio n plan fo r permitting.

Deliverables: Permitti ng Plan and submissions will incl ude a draft for Ci ty review and final for submittal to agencies.

Sub Task 4.6 - Energy Tax Credits / Incentives
Objective: Explore Federal and State tax credi ts for energy ge nerating and storage faci lities and ot her incentives re lated lo faci lities such as energy savings equipment and electrica l vehicles charging stations.

AECOMIWML Activities : AECOM/ WM L will explore the feasibi lity of the City obtaining fun di ng from the fo llowing:

Solar Incentives ( Federal ITC):

The Federal Investme nt Tax Credit ( ITC) allows the water treatmen t faci lity to cla im 30% of th e total cost of their solar insta llation. This includes solar pane ls, inverters , labor, an d other associated costs like pe nm itti ng fees. The ITC app lies to projects com pleted between now and 2032, providing signifi cant tax savings . For instance, a S100, 000 solar installation would result in a $30,000 tax credit, reducing upfront expenses . If th e facility' s tax liability is less than the credit, the remaining amount can be carried over into future years. Thi s ma kes solar insta llation more affordable and offers a quicker return on investment.

Battery Energy Storage Incent ives ( SGIP):

The California Self- Generation Incentive Program ( SG IP) provides rebates for ba ttery energy storage syste ms BESS). The rebate starts at $ 150 per kilowatt- hour ( kWh) of installed battery capacity. Afte r th e SGI P rebate is applied. the federa l Investment Tax Cred it ( ITC) allows you to claim 30 % of the rema ining project cost. For example, if a battery system costs $ 100, 000 and qualifies for a $ 15. 000 SG IP rebate , the ITC would then apply lo the re maining $ 85, 000. This combined approach can signifi can Uy reduce the overall cost.

Direct Pay Provision :

For tax- exempt entities like nonprofits or govern ment- ru n faci lities . Direct Pay all ows them to rece ive the fu ll value of lhe ITC as a direct payment instead of a tax credit. This ensures that even entities without tax liabilities can fu lly benefit from both the ITC and any bonus credits.

Deliverabl es: Power Point prese ntation for wo rkshop with agenda and tech nica l co ntent. Meeti ng minutes after workshop.

Key Understanding: This effort is lim ited to the identifica tion of the programs tha t the C ity qualifies fo r and does not include planning and designi ng a renewab le energy fac ilities .

Meetings/ Travel: PowerPoint presenta tion will be delivered virtua lly.

Information and Servic es Provided by Others : City to provide type of energy generating and stora ge faci lities is targeting.
15 1114
A:-coM W. M. LYLES CO.
a ~,,.,. m.r• ------
Scope Clarifications , Assumptions , and Exclusions
City of Baming
Progressive Design- Build Services
Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled
Water Upgrades Project
Phase 1 Scope of Wof1< ( AN" L)
Our Phase 1 Services are based on the technical approa ch and concepts presented in our Technical Proposal ( Section 3).

No CCTV or other video surveillance systems are included in the Phase 1 Services.

We have assumed a 2-week City review time for each submittal.

The fa cility sizing is based on information provided in the concept documents and discussions with the City.

Key assumptions include a Maximum Month Flow rate of 3.6 mgd, BOD of 317 mgn. TSS of 318 mgn and tota l Nitrogen of 58 mg/ I.

The exte nt or SCADA integral ion of existing facilities will be determined during Phase 1.

Our Phase 1 scope of services does not inc lude any services related to asbestos or hazardous or toxic materia ls, paint, etc.

Costs for unp lanned upgrades to existing structures or build ings to comply with National Fire Protection Agency , ADA. or building code requiremen ts triggered by electri cal or renovation work in existing facilities is not included.

The requested and provided Bid Bond ( 20% of the Phase 1 Cost) will be deemed satisfied and no longer in effect upon the execution of a Phase 1 contract. II will not be carried forward to Phase 2.

Performance and Payment Bonds for the PDB Basis of Design Services are not included in lhe Pricing Information Form PDB Basis of Design Seivices. Cost of Payme nt and Performance bonds for the fu ll va lue of the contract wi ll be provided upon execution of the GMP and Phase 2 contract amendment.

The Phase 1 Baseline Preliminary services follow the schedu le and timeline presenled as part of this proposal submission.

We assume progress meetings will be conducted via video conferen ce using Microsoft Teams.

Cost for phase 1 wi ll be managed as a whole and not by individual tasks requested to be provided in the cost for ms on a time and material basis. The Design Build team will have the abi lity to move funds as needed between tasks to complete the Phase 1 activities without exceeding th e tota l contract va lue. The price breakdown presented in the Proposal Forms is provided for reference onty and does not represent the cost to perform individual items of work separate ly.

Electrica l design will be limited lo all new faci lities and not inclusive of the design of a fa cil ity-wide upgrade and/ or replacement of the existing electrical infrastructure. 16 Clyafllarnng- WWTI'& RK) ldadW._ ProjKl• Up
ON4gltACorlnldoft~ ~~-,----
Pt>•'"-""!
Oll.JII _, r_,,,..,..,,._,... __ ,..

J~
t,-... ....

Qt-r,
rw-o-,-toi,_
11"'- 0...,,,---
1•~- 0lol'
P, 0.-_,_ ... _
c...,. c-.-
c•,--
t. M! l,,,_~ p, 1~--..-~
o,, t, .. .,_,..;. c1,...,__ ~-~
t(Mfiu:,,..., __ _
Ill-'"" __ c..o __ _
o.n,,i .. _._ e..--c,.o,o-owl-ol"""'1 Cl "-; t.•
t""41 "' U. O Cl e...~-
l +.•,...•-:n-.,,..: io,!? 1~-: 0,.,
1 . ia...,,__, i~--~ l
Ea;--+--.--.-..-~
P?'
0 • 1-M .
0 •• .,.

JI'~
1-oO! .. a .,..,..,.. -· ,,_ .._....,...
a .......... --·
A
A.."COM
o--.,..J.-Ood
r.--.. d-.. :
omf-.. ll\-'it.w111-. 1eo.+ .....
i :-~~~~-
c:::i -~ jrrw-DMl•Pl-'.
b 111"-C...., POll• RW
I X""r.U...90
c:: 1 '"'- 0-· Cli--
Er -~;co,.;;.:_ : .
r=J6 t::~~::±:.:::,::.
9 f.llp''~-..~~> Nj"""' I\L,o
c:::::;:,..,.,_ f-; • •
r= 1 ..,,~~- t! w'-.
1c::::=:=;:=:::: n.111~1
CAt• t-···----.-- e-~
c:;:1 -~ 0. 0..-..+ ...... '
g _~~ ... ~·~---~-
1115
l ... -... ·-· -· .
f g! I ~ s! t • t t1!, t~ ll: i ej:! l$ l! I ~: st, " ll!; ~·~ ~~ l.IJ mi nu mmnrn mi uH mt HH1"-
1116
illfillc I\JJlllll.t1k,11ait••c llllf11f.ll>,:'1111. II!: ii S • i ~ -- mm mwrmm nmrnnm H 1• ni -
f!f!!! fffffllii!!!f ll!l!!!lif!!! !I
l ..... .

J •• ~
i
i ... j
J
1117
r-.. -... a. s 11 ... 1111 ...........
tli!lfii !f!tfti!
tii!!tli !f!ltl!!
1'····-· ... -· ··-............... ..
l~a;,: 8? 1•• ...... st~ .. ~:s--~ i~-l _:;,_t:;. 3.-~,;:;._.~_ i ii !if!ttt!f! itil!!!l fi!!!t i!f!!tiit!!i!!
nmmnu
1118
G", IS-~~-& issM: i.!l,( t.::: .... 11 .... ;;.,. •• ,..,:,;;;~ i,: ... ">,._ ....... -.,:, ... a f l!?I ···111 111:11 11·1 11·1·11·1111!f" ~,,.,,, i •••• lll.,,1,,,,, ., 1,,. 1,\ t,l.,.,t,i 1 •• l,,, II!! li!!lll!lf!f !!ll!llllflllllll!i 1111111
I
l~i~,~~i ,~,~Jii~Ji, '
HiiBHH i~HislHBl
s l!I g.., .. -'". s -~ ,!. 5 ':! I .. ! : s ".. .. ! I :J l!I !' ~ . s : s"' .. - mm mnmmu mm1rn
1119
2110. 220
nun I
WO.

P20. 22.
4•2N2 Y2V0
OYE
P
Sa
255+, 02
rn,
021
aril=
2012
W
MI
IJ,. •
al..]
b
b.. 5555m 1
212 xV,. 1 2120.
0b. 10
ml2
P-. 1, . 1•
µ
I
1 IMp.. J_Isl... 1.1..,.{ y•
b.,
eY22. 21 20,
0 bi
oa

65.? mlYp
c15.. me
202.
22 2
2202.,•

22. 2.0
ir1c.
mA N....
55 55 _. _
LS1, 1, 74
a. c..: wl, rte. 1155
1 /
w. d
I
uu- w} 5. Ye
a. c 55 Y.,.
2,4
c •s
i.45.

IIiI2

2. 2
211• 0 .
212 . 2212
22 .
2 55
55 55
5555 .. 55 .

6..
dc,... Ioan..
r
Igpr
1 55

55.. .

I
a. n
b.
fbaa1a+ 5.... ab. .r . J' sw.
pw••.,
sy. . w
5•
45, a555, V
5 9'
2 ,Sa. a1
I2r. 2.. 21w22.
mv. tx,
k
wf...
n0ti. . w. 2i a 5_-..
w
w...aK'
i
1 f.

Y
55r
2 .
522,.. ,. [
12 ec .V2
a., _
4[ w+.
0 2alai -
a

32. 2 ,

2. 2

22..
2 c.,*,
Si. aa.
y.. I_,
anuairr . 14..

Ye 55.02,
0225. 555
txrrs
5555
a
s. _

2. 402.•
22 55..

2..•
J
n...

E,
00202, ,

5.,.
a
ti. a4 .

Wvy..

Sa
n.. u5. Y5
55 .
022., 2.
au. N
f2..
202
BAY

52.( 55[ .....

T
s,.
s,
x •
ncv
wu.
rwl, 5555, 1155++
5IVO,
wane

15. 1
911. 1. 1e11, 105, 11001.
1•
115

0. 8
4 0,.. l
I ,,
5555,$ . .
2 .
a, a
W. N 2e,.

25..,
b., ,
r
I .
i
u.

72. iry
YL a.

GS> dq
E. E
aar Ev
a
Ca.*.. x022.

I

12. 2, 1
Year,.

NY
l,,

2.. J
a

2.»

4. 0202 .
as,
a!
a.. 4.%

22. w.
w «.
w ,>:

Er
nHaa
t'
X»
ae ..
u.
s.

Jr..

55. yYet
55, 2. 2. 1
m..,, Nuke
d
Yes
s, .
r
A
u.
2ena2
M. M ••
r.,
A_
251. 2.-. .

J.
rn2
1e, s
D..
rn
DEWY 223t3 “ 1•
N •
2110211, 502121622 .. 12
C2, 22422 , 10120
2 2
22 Jr< •
2 2, 1224 24222. 02. 22
2, 2
mama

6. a.. e
00, 21 •
xarwl IO20
N.. 222 ,Yeyet
272
yWl
alI
2 Roma. Vem eeeei
O2a..., a
Para.
n. .. •.. .
a .

L- C
OM
a
5 .
1 I11
I -
S
CU
1120
Appendix A
Index of Drawings and Specifications
AECOM / W. M. LylesCo.
3960 Industrial Blvd.

Suite 300
w. Sacramento, C.A 95691
916) 375- 18330ffi ce
9l6) 375- l 848Fax
w.vw.aecom .com
WVN1. wmtyies. com
BANNt,IG WWTP DRAWlt\lG UST
Estimated Leffi of Deti, d for EKh P.,. eent {%} Submittal p - partial, e - eo~• t•. r -final
tn, DESIG N
MGJ' ll1 COVERSM£ ET f
OOG- 002 N)E)( OfDAAWINl,-- SI I
mCJlrll INOEXOFORAWING! II f
00 G-!) 011 5TRVCTVRE DESIGHATION KE'\' I .,...,. --""' Jo! ll
f,-tl~ ,,.,,
c:ai7 .,.,,
tAN •
NOTE.$ ANOA88RE' N" TtoNS
ECfi. iiW.. CODE RE'> 1EWARE.\ ci. Assii= i&TION
l)}A,101
05A- 102
O& A,,.-01
a1 4,101
07A. 111'
eu. OONC -..,.,, .. , -..,.,,.., ----
C.ELINGPI.. AN°
l~~~=== k~~ iPt» J
1111~1 ROTA.RY ~ SUEV" TlOHS
11111 A.)( 11 flOTARY ~ MCl< EJ, l;RS SECTIONS
9'1- A,,SOI DETAILS I
f",~ DETAUI
l"~l DETAIL. S Iii
t,;_, 000R SCHEOI. LEANDOIE1.-.., S
l>~A.. t;O;! ,~/ LOIJIJE" ll:SCMEOlU FMSH !. CKDl. l.E &_ Q!:) Al.. S AA. 101 E ALT ?. E "' PLA. N
I Y}. A-- 10J: R00EMIC" 1.STC: R,\(; E$F>C"".) FPU." l ~ z:: i:~~~~~=~~ t;;s
0 I '[§ l=~H-™''~"' I : I ; I : I : I
115- 101
01!.- 102
t\JS- 101
nk~O!
iiNE-~ l' iot[!" l/, H
fWE SCN: Et.' 5 • iJiiieR LE\' n? I.NI
FlNESCREEHS - SEC~_ -
Ofl:S . FOUHOAT10to PI.N<
REACTOR' S - LPPERLEV' El. Pl.A.'\!
1121

BANNING WWTP DRAWING UST
Estlml' t• d L• vel or 0. 1, 11 for e , ch Pen::.,, t (%) Subll' litt, 1 p • partial, c • ~mpl4,te, f • final
0,$. 302
REACTORS. SECTIONST
R£ACT~ R$ • $ ECTIONS I
IE rN«S/PERMEATE ~~• PU.' l&SECTIOt. S
P£RMIE. ATE PUl,f?!S • PLAN & SECTlONS
PRCX. E& S~:- PU. M& SE(..~
101 UY SYSTE~\ JPf' ER LOY, I
06S- 1~ UVSYSTEM TAMK- UPPV
ot;o;...»1 UV! r''STE I.I S1:: CT10NS I
065- 302 WSY! ITEhl IOHSI
Y'(-5-\ l)I
020- 10\
0'20-1a2
1)31),103
IYl O-lQI
11,.1).102
0'.: 0-'° 2
a. e:. ll!!
01!10-11)1
O!HX)• 101
00-11)1
090-, 02
fof
X'<0-1"2
CHEMICAL s_tiSMGf - PUii & ~
ROTARY D' lUMTHICKENER.."- S•Pt.AN I ~-E. CT~
ST'RUCTI, JP.ALSTANClNiOOETAllS I
STRUC~ STANDll' IAO OETAII.. S ft
STRUCTl. JRAL STANDAAO DETALS 1ft
STRUC' T\ JIW..!, T~ DE. T
STRUCTURAL STMCNID Df. TMLS V
BlEKllNG T. VM - Pl..."'' tS MD Sf: Cll0" 1$
CHEMCAl. FACR. JT' f. F1. AlLS NC SECTIONS
PEP. MEATE fo fH/ PI.IAP5
PERJ, E>,TES EI\N PU. FSSECT' k» I I
uvOlSll¥ ECTIONFACITI. YSECTION I
UV~ E(.. TFJf, l~_l!Y_¥ CTJON I
H' f~~~~ R
ROT SECTlONI
o
fi6 ,
aJiajo[
r
Clo,•- wo, 111 ·--' l~ N ...,_..•·"- OIBANNW\ IG WWTP OR. Aw. NG UST Esllm, ted L41~ of D•~ it f~ EM: h P¥ unt (%) Submittal p • partial, c • coml)lett, f -final
I """"""' I ,., ... ,,~. I .: DOAW,, GTIM I ......... I ..... ~ .. , I ......... I ,.,.,..,$ 0. 00 H-001 LEOOIDS, Sl1ol80l. S ,- OTES AHO ABIIKE\-' IATIONS Ol)H-0(.2. SCHEDI. U' I -__,
OoH- 11,() l!EOUEHCEOFOPERATION , U,CJCCNTR( ll
lliH-101 IF1.00PFI.. ANS
05H- 102 jROOf" Pt.AN
i-..201 IEl EVATIONi
I ::::m 1=~::,::. =
LEGOO J+:> TESN40A8eS' tfVAl~ :=
1=: i
D} P-100 1E=~==~
1:~~L~™ ROOM\ H> ERGRQMD I J
1 O') FP,.,) 01 LE GEHO NOTES . t.M0 4813REVAOOHS
G!,FP- 001 f>tr! N.:; Rbl! RS~ IUU. S
11F- Fp...,)01 :,,, SlNJ. ATION OETA. 1.S
fNi'H' C,.. bpl
OOM: 101 S'/' MBOt. S. LE: OEMlNIOGENERAL. NOTES
t===l===i==11== t====11 :: I-Qr J,;ET,YOAl( OWJIW. I~ ~ 01i.-<XJ1 HE, 00,\' 0RICSJU< l1-1NESCR' EENS I
011--1X12 na~ RKSNIOANE SCREENSII
02M'. IOI - RATION TAAIICS I n IN
l-00'\ ~ MBIW' E U.',11($ t. 11. 111
Ml. Ml PERME. t,TEA." I08ACIC\, A$ HPIJMPS
05M: 101 IIIER. ltiTIClf, I BLOWERS
O'!iM>X' MSR ~ 31.0YfERS
o,U-001 W SYSTEM D j
Ml- 002 f'\AKT\' oATEl-' PUMPS
oTI: ooi ~
oeJ- 002 ROfl
C$ M:101 otGfSTERS I 1
M ~ eta£ TER! II
i91- oJ! J1 ut:!, C.\ lol
9SII-- IXl2 Mt& C. Kl l
l-001 POPSOI
l-00' 2 ROf'& oll
X'< 1,-0()l EVN> OPJ. T P0N00 Pill I

0. l-004 ! V..VOAA P. W I
WISCEll.., O.NE()US OET,._ S
JO. I-OIM PH ING
OOE,.') 01 ElECTlUCAll. EGENO SVM90lSANOAB8REWl lONS
El.EClRICAL SITE PlN-• ~, ER
E.IJO) ELfCr,., cAl SITE f'\.A'I/ I· SYSTEMS
E . SINGlEI. JNEOtAOAA. M I- EXST, Sh' BO- MS· DEMOLl" TlON OO E~ ~ GI. ELJNfOIA. GAAM • EXST. MCC, l • DatoUTION
ll"E.l'IOII, ~ GlEI. JNE - EXST. wct-.....,. OEMOltT" ICM =~:: ~~~~~- 1~~.:_...~ TtoNS ,. t
DOE~ ELE<. TR1CAl9C. HEDl, I. ES · C~...,,-,\~ ll.. MCUJRE D", E-« D a. E(. TlUCM. SCNEIJ'.. l..El'>M• T~ ut- RE~
OOE-' I0,4 SCAO.\ S' ISTEUNEl\ DIAGRAM
OllE4: 16 DATA, V, OPl- lOHES' f.!ITEMNtorNORK~ GRAI,,! OOE-'! 05 FlREALARMS' fSTEMIETWORKDl.\ GRAM
1e.,o, FJNCSCREE. NS - POIVERPI.. MI
Fl!' iESCREENS • S'l'STc.,,, S l'1... NI
AHE 5CRE£ NS -~ R DIMAAMS
01 E• UI• Ao!!l'lATICIN ANKS - POY, P;RP\.AN I
Q2- E-1tl2 - AATION TNIKS- I
U- E-~ 1 ::~~~=:~ v~:_~ ---------~ .... l
MBAANE TNIKS • l'OWER N I
MEMBRANE TANKS. pg.~ P\..A.~
03 !• 2'01 UEMBR. vETAN( S•SYSlEMSl' LN- I I
O!E-.202 ME" 8AANETN- IKS-. sn. 1El. t!iPUN II

1.1Et. 8RANET#, Nll;$, R1SER$
l-DQ•..._. J/ Ufl, Jb C IY0ttA,r.i!IIG'A'Wt~••C1'11CllU ltltlNGAAOrl-( l.!,wwo,:'; L1$1 l · llr1122 nJ
1111111111
iij ~~~i M 11 ~ jii"e ! in u~
d~ ~--~ H H H ~ ~ H §~~ ; s~ u = n !~~~ ~m iH ~ -
a .
1111111111
1rlli~
wf<
lrl
mjH i~ ii fHi
r111 "~~~1~,1~1
l!l!H
if~
li: i
l1i ·H i
H j ! L
H t - ir; H
H
5 I] i
i
ti' r~I ll
I ~ !' i'~ i! . r ~ J
i
If! ,. i
l-. •
Is i ·,
If I
d I 1:~~
ii
f
d ~ ! ii ~ i! ~
h · 1
I
I
l!
i" j
u • ! ~-~~
ii
i . ••
I"" ,, .. ''.' . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . ' .. . .. . . '. ,, .... ,,. ,, .. . . . ... . ,, . . .. . . I r 5 n ... " • " n . . ... . .. ... .. . """" ,.,.,,,,.,. """" ... ,.,,.,,., '" """" ... ... . . . . . . ... ... ,,., I
o ,.,.,.,. 00" 00 ... ... , 0 .. """" """"" """" • , 0 n r, r, n n """" 00" ... • 00 ... ... .......... i
1123
j ! f'· iiiii~ HH I §~ Ue ioo ~
H n ~
000
iii ~ee iHHi ·~ 288 ~ nu
l,~ gi§~ -~~ ~; ~-- sg§! ~~ i~ ~~~ i: H 1$ t -~H§ ~~~ ~~~ s ~ H 1r11
i"{f . n >tf
Hl,llllf u
TI pn -~ r
il'~' I
ii l!l!I!~ IZ • ih i ~, f n ~· 1 • I
111!111i
i~~ " ,~ tr ["
I . ~ . ) z= I
I
l L
p
11 l~ J
i.. !. i~ r
i'i : t .
r .
f ~ i
i ~!. !. I
I' ~
r If 1
i •
f
l
I ~ !
i ~ ! i
j j ~ -!
Ki ! i ~· ~, !
f ~ "
ij
ii .. . . . .

I §
nnn " 00 """ .. . . " n n n ..,..,,,., """" ,., ....... . " ... . . . . . . " 00 "" " 00 . . . .. ~ 1 li
nnnnn<> ,.,.,.,. """"" . . . ... .. . . n n n ,. """" """" nnnn ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . """""" ,.,.,.,, I
ii ---------------------------... --.. -------... ------- 0 I
1124
Task Description Cost of Work
Exhibit C Task 1 Design
Task 1.1 Preliminary Design Report (PDR) $ 352,948
Supporting Pricing Information Task 1.2 30% Preliminary Design $ 691,617 Task 1.3 60% Design Phase $ 915,033
Task 1.4 Hydraulic Analysis/ Hydraulic Profile $ 54,452 Task 1.5 90% Design Phase $ .

Task 1.6 Final Design Phase $ 1,054,067
Task2 Cost Estimating
Task 2.1 Initial Baseline Cost Model and Updates ( 5) $ 162,598 Task 2.2 GMP Development $ 105,754
Task 3 Meetings & Reports
Task 3.1 Kick- off Meeting/ Workshop ( 1) $ 42,934
Task 3.2 Progress Meetings and Reports ( 16) $ 123,563
Task 3.3 Project Status Reports ( Monthly with Invoice) $ 47,709 Task 3.4 Risk Management Workshop ( 1) $ 18,766
Task 3.5 Constructability Review Workshops ( 2) $ 47,591 Task 3.6 SCADA Development and Scoping Workshops ( 4) $ 55,966 Task4 Investigation/ Support
Task 4.1 Potholing and Cultural Monitoring $ 24,577
Task 4.2 Topographic Survey $ 29,954
Task 4.3 Environmental Support ($ 30,000 allowance) $ 27,444 Task4. 4 Geotechnical Investigation $ 121,809
Task 4.5 Permitting Support and Title 22 and Title 27 { if needed) Eng Reports $ 96,836 Task 4.6
Energy Tax Credits/ Incentives $ 25,009
Total $ 3,998,627
1125
Exhibit D
List of Reference Documents
1==1"'=1~;,1;;; ·= 1-- r-'= 1 "'' l-ii-1--l -- i -=.s - 1''E1-=--'"::;.. -- le-- 1--1:-= I=- c·:::,
1126
U il : I
c==:l
c==:l
1127

CITY OF BANNING
WATER/ WAsrEWATER UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
115 •• -~-' 1 ---=-= --~-------•~ t{ -,~~. -=:;;;;;;;;;;;; z==::.::=~;;;;;;;;;;~~;;;;;;;;;;,=====~~~~=========,:"i;::= i , ,. •:. ~. r ,, ~---..
7 I
I
I
I I
I NP- 1 RESEJ< VO! R N< D BOOSTER I
I I
I I
I I~
I '
I
I
I

I FVTVRE
I EX~ ION
I
I
I
I
l _____ J11 L!I
0'.,.
b
I
11 __
9 CMI 5If I.A:xruI
SCAI..£: ,•., t0•- a•
i
i(JI ~;]
Ii: ;~~
l fi ..

C-101
S .,~--.•

INTIAL STUDY/

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION AND

PHASE I RECYCLED WATER SYSTEM
October 2007
1128
SECTION 1

1.1 1 2

1.3 1.4

1.5 1.6
1 7

1.8 1.9

1.10 111
1 12
1 13
114
1 15
SECTION 2
II
Ill
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
XI
XII
XIII .

XN
xv
XVI
XVII .

SECTION 3

3.1 3.2

CONTENTS
PROJECT INFORMATION ................................................................................................. 1 Projecl Title ..

Lead Agency Namt> and Address .

Contact Person and Phone Number
Project Location .

ProIect Sponsor·• Name and Add ress .

General Plan Oesign8ho n
Zomng
Oescnption of the Proposed PrOject
Background .

Purpose of the ProIect .

Conslructoon
Operat10n
Related Pr()fecl5
Surrounding Land Uses and Selling ..

Ot her Agencies Whose Approval Is Required

CEQA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Aesthetics ....

Ag riculture Resources
Alr Quality.

Btological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology and Soils
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Hydrology and Water Oua fdy
Land Use and Planning .

Mineral Resources
Noise
Popu lation and Housing .

Public Sennces
Recreation
Transporta! Jon/ Traffic
Utilities and Service S.

Mandatory Findings of S1gmficance ..
1 1
2 2
2 3
8 8
10 12
12 15
15 16
16 18
22 24
25 28
31 32
32 34
35 35
36 37
39 SUPPORTING INFORMATION ........................................................................................ 40 References .

List of Preparers
40 41

APPENDICES
A
B
C
D
E

CONTENTS (CONT 'D)
Clean Air Act General Confomuty Applicability Analysis
FEMA Flood Zone Maps
Cultural Resources Survey Report
Biological Resources Survey Repon
Mitigat ion Monitoring and Reponing Program

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Location of the Proposed PrOjeci
Proposed Expansion ol the Banning WWTP and Phase I Recycled Wa ter Distribution System .

Proposed Expansion of the Bann ing WWTP on 16•Acre Site .

PrOJected Demand for Recycled Waler m the Banning Area
MBR Process Train ..
2 4
5 7
9 LIST OF TABLES
Table 1
Table 2
Related Projects in the Vicinny of the Proposed Project . 10 Eslimated Air Pollutan1 Em1ss1 ons from Proposed Expans10n of the Banning VWITP and Construci, on of Recyc led Waler Pipe lines ......... 17 1129

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

CITY OF BANN ING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION AND

PHASE I RECYCL ED WATER SYSTEM
The City of Banning Pu blic Ut11it1es Department proposes 10 construct and operate the firs t phase of rts recycled water system in Banning . The Proposed ProJect would include expansion of the existing 3 .6 molhon gallons per day ( mgd) wastewater treatment plant ( WWTP), new pipelines to transport recycled water. a pump station, and a storage reservoir for recycled water.

The California Environmenta l Quality Act ( CEQA), as estabfished by the statute ( Public Resources Code§§ 21000 et seq.), requ ires that the environmental 1mpltcat! Ofls of an action by a local agency be estimated and evaluated before p,qect approval. This Initial Study has been prepa red on accorda nce with Sec~ on 15365 of CEQA Guidelines ( 14 Cal Code Reg . 1500 ef seq.). This Initial Study provides the assessment for a determination of whether the pro1ect may have a significant effect on the environment

1.1 1.2

1.3 1.4

1.5 SECTION 1. PROJECT INFORMATION
Proj ect Title
Lead Ag ency
Name and
Ad dress
Contact Person
and Phone
Number
Proj ect Location
Project Sponsor' s
Name and
Address
Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion and
Phase I Recycled Water Syslem
City of Ban ning WaterMlastewaler Utilities Department
176 E L111coln Street
Banning , Ca lifornia 92220
Mr Paul Toor, Director
951) 922- 3283
The City of Banning 1s located on RJVers! de County approximately 20 miles west of Palm Springs along the Interstate 10 ( 1-10) corndor The C~y of Banning wastewater treatment plant ( WWTP) is localed at 2242 East Charles Street, south of the 1-10 and sout h of the Banning Municipal Airport ( Figure 1). The existing Banning W/1/TP IS located on approximately 126 acres and includes treatment plant process urnts , an operations build ing, percolation pond•. sludge drying beds. and a vacant field west of the process units Ap proximately 16 of these acres are vacant, and would be used for the proposed W/1/TP expansion Adjacent land uses are rural residential and ., dustnal The Cily' s animal sheller and Smtth Creek are loca led south of the Bann, ng WWTP .

The proposed recycled water pi peline would be constructed from the Banning W/1/TP west along Cllal1es Street . north on Hathaway Street , continuing west on Lincoln Street 10 South Sunset Avenue where ~ turns south on Sunset Avenue to the unpaved City access road ( extension of Westward Avenue) that crosses unimproved land terminating at the Sun Lakes hou sing deve lopment on the west.

Coty of Banning WaterMlastewater Utditoes Department
176 E Lincoln Street
Banning, California 92220

1.6 1.7

1.8 o~.,! Ornl
l ,_!-!_'!!_f• J GI.,,._,.• .- os.."""~ io JJ11f9" 1u ~~ ~ ~~ Sa• u v'ern• fon'Ulna ~ . Salt l•mwdlftO •· aw
o~.Angeles . ~ P-' -°"• • ~• - 1 ® ..::::,•
f . @ • ~' -"'"" Colton • IIEJ •""
1"": ,....,, ~
tntlosAn...,...._ Dlalt, 1111d.,_ ' Y' ., c,.f1fflt!\_ ' ruUIP6 OowMr '--'
Ftell• rton
G> td- 1, C • Anai, ol, n
u -. t • ttl• •
UMlll••• th
@ L tm1mte,
Hun\ lnf ton B ach l •
Pr0ptnd Expancfatt tf
Binning W'VI~ and
Phan I R, cycltd W. tcr Sys1e: m
fit t"" r......._ J onola HA 7 Laii' U1. 6re, Winc:hn1~ fi ...... .. ~, l M. tw' d Wl. f910
tosU.- u M1r lon VIOio \,\',
0 -~• Mh o
S.,_ W• n caplttrano Tefflftula
Mfta Pofflt
tiiu ... ,..
i'
P•t:H/c: ,...,
Cfffl' ltnt• , f'01,ot-f!O•
Ocean ~-- hllt. l'DOk
0 : Jl l-t
jli! M V. tflrt
@} Vh\.a :) VldW,CtM.-,
e :001 MMI0.-91 IN e ,001 1'~
µ., General
Plan
Designation
Zoning Description
of the
Proposed
Project Figure 1. Location of the Ptoposod
Project The Cily of Bann ing General Plan desig nation for the Banning WMTP i• Public Facilo\ ies and Industrial. Although the p roposed recycl ed waler pipeline would be placed prima ri ly in existing or planned streets and the city ot Banni ng rights--0f-way , the alignme nt would cro• s ove rthe following General Pla n designations :

Industrial, A irport Industrial, Public Facilities, Genera l Cornmerclal, BuJi ness Park, Very Low Dens~ yRes idential , Low Dens ity Residentia l, Med ium Density Residential, Open Space Pa rk , and Ope n Space Resou rces (C ityof Banning ,
2007a). The location of the proposed project is zo ned consi stent with the Ban ning Genera lPla n. The Banning WWTP is zoned
Industrial. The proposed corridor for the recycled wate rpipel ine is zoned for industri al, commercial and residential
uses. The City of Banning proposes to expand its 3.6 mgd wastewater trealment plant and construct faci lities lo support its planned recycled waler storage and distri bulion capability In accordance wrth th e Banning Recycled Water Master Plan . The capacity of the existing ' MNTP , on approximately 126 acres of land, would expand from 3 6 mgd to 5.1 mgd . The additional 1.5 mgd capacity would include a n advanced treatment process using a
Membrane Bioreactor ( MBR) to produce recycled water. The MBR treatment process would satisfy State of Californ ia Department of Health Services ( OHS) Title 22 waterq uality requ ~ements withoul filtration. Construction of the proposed recycled water system will provide need ed re cycled water to th e Sun Lake s housing deve lopment in
1130

1.9 Background
southwest Bannon9. Recycled water would also be used for Imgat10n of pari< s, golf cou, ses, street medians and greenbelts in the Phase I service area as shown on Figure 2 . As shown on Figure 2 , the Proposed Project would require construction at three locations .

Approximately 16 of the 126 total acres of property al the Banning VWITT' are undeveloped land , and would be used for the proposed \/ 1/'NfP e•pans10n . Th1S undeveloped land 15 west of the exisbng WWTP and south of Char1es Street This 16. ocre site does not have any structures and rs currently not m use. This undeveloped land would be used for the proposed WNTP
expansion ; a new controls building and laboratory , a 100- l\ diameter water storage reservoir tank , chlonne contact basins fine screening fac1 hty , recycled water pad and sump , and the MBR b,oreactors would be constructed on the 16-acre site ( Figure 3) Existing Well R1 , east of the VWVTP and its percolation ponds, would be retrofiUed in order to extract and convey groundwater into the treatment process . Approxmately 3 500 feet of buned pipeline would be constructed from the wellhead to the access road and along Charles Street to the WWTP expans., n s,te.

Approximately 5 miles of recycled water pjpehne would be constructed from the e•isting \/ 1/'NfP to the Sun Lakes housing development to the west The p1peltne alignment would be primanly alorig ex, sting roadways and within the Ct!y's nght- ofway The pipeline would run from the wwrP along Charles Slteet. north on Hathaway Street , continuing west on Lincoln Street to Sunset Avenue where it would turn south on Sunset Avenue to the unpaved City acces.s road that crosses unimprov- ed land lo lhe Sun Lakes housing development on the west side ( the unpaved access road is an extension of Westward Avenue). The recycled wate, line would continue west on lhis access road along with the existing water, sewer and gas line to reach the Sun Lakes housing development
The City of Banning WalerNVaslewater Utiitles Department is responsible for providing water and for the collection of wastewaler from homes and businesses , including approximately 12 .800 dwellings. The Crty has been providing high quality dnnking water to the reS1dent1 since 1967. More than 30 ,000 res, dents in Banning depend on the Department lo proV1< le water service to their homes and businesses By 1upply1ng local groundwater pumped from Cityowned welts, the Department is able to meet the daily demands of customers .

The Banning \/ 1/'NfP was ongmally constructed in 1968. The plant Is operated and maintained by Unrted Water SeMce a publicprivate partnership. Recent upgrades have resulted in an increase of secondary treatment capacity to 3 6 mgd . The headworks , completed in 1999. were designed for an ultimate capacity of 7 8 mgd As of January 2005 , the plant re<:4'tved an average lloW of approximately 2.4 mgd { C11y of Banning , 2005). The wwrP , s designed for an influent b!OlogIcal oxygen demand ( BOD) of 250 milligrams per liter ( mg/ L). The WNTP Is currently receiving flow with an average BOD concentrat, on of 300 mg/ L.
sA. i; UOflnq,, 1110 . teJeA,\ pef'JA:>e}:I I Hlr4d puir dlMM 6U] UUIQ ~ i JO IIOfSU~ X3 pasoelo, c:1 · i &1n8t:1 1 JtlfM i
P" IWll! ll....i..t
L_
H¥ rJ•, S
l1A -_
I
l
1131
IIEIIB°" E
CHLO JUNE BIO~
CONTACT RE.ACTORS
I. AS. IN S: ( IS Bll)
o _, f ---..
1-.,r.:" , tfi'

EXISTING FACILITIES
15 MGO EXPAIISION
F~ure 3, Proposed E)Q)anston of the Banning WWTP on 16-Acra Site Sewer services are provided to the entire city hmrts and to the unincorporated areas of Riverside County that surround lhe southeast section of the City Collected wastewater is transported by 8-. 10-. 15- and 18-inch diameter sewer main lines connected to trunk lines Wastewater recetved at the Ban ning WNTP undergoes treatment consisbng of screening, grit removal , prknary c\artfication , trickling filters, and secondary clariliers . Anaerobic d,gesters and sludge drying beds are used for & ludge stabilization and dewalerin~.

The eXJsting WWrP does not meet Title 22 treatment requirements .

Treated effluent from the eX1Slin9 WWTP is di6Charged to percolation ponds located west and northeast of the WWTP . This effluenl subsequently recharges the East Banning storage unrt { City of Banni ng , 2005). The City has fu ture pla ns lo evaluate the effect of the current effluent discharge on the groundwa\ e, qualrty and develop a mdigation plan , if necessary . As part or the eval uauon the City intends to submrt the monitonng plan wtth1n three years following the approval of the Waste Discharge Permit for the existing

3.6 mgd WWTP and 1.5 mgd Water Reclamation Facility by the Regiona l Board . Once the monito ring plan is approved. the City will the n install morn tonng wells to esta blish a baseUne for the groundwa1er qualify . Depending on the outcome of the evaluatJOn , the City will adopt a mitigation pla n which could include , ~ mng the percolation ponds. retrofitting the existing WWTP with nutrient removal treatment processes or diluting the effluent from the exoslong WWTP with the higher quality effluent from the proposed MBR plant.

The City of Banning does not produce or use recycled water at this time Treated wastewater i• not being used to offset potable water demands Golf courses, pari< s and other medians are currently being irrigated with potable water. The demand for recycled water continues to grow In the area .

In order 1o provide re<:ycled water for 1mgahon. the WWTP would have lo be upgraded to meet Title 22 tertiary standards . This would require acttvated sludge, moc rofi ltration, and disinfection { Crty of Banning , 2005)
The demand for recycled water in the Banning area JS projected at over 2.600 acre- feet per year ( see Figure 4). Recycled water can be used to meet future irrigation demand and subsequently, offset a portion of the potable water demand. Recycled water production is projected to increase at a much higher rate than recycled waler demand . By the year 2030 it is proJecled that the City would have approximately 7,500 acre- feel per year of surplus recycled water. 1 Trtle 22 1s the State of California' s code for health and safety standards for dnnkong water 0 M510t1 • of this code requ ires an adeQuately oxtd1zed. coagulated , cianhed Mered and d4suitected wastewater 6 1132
Q
c., ...... _ .... .,._......,.,._
Fig1,1re •· Profec; ied D•m.and for R•cye. led Waler in th• ~nnlng Al' ff

1.10 Purposeofthe
Project

1.11 Construction
The City of Banning will be submittin9 an applictltion for a State Revolving Fund ( SRF) loan to the State Water Ra50urce1 Control Board The SRF Loan Program IS parba~y funded by the u s Env~onmental Protection Agency ( USEPA) and subject to federal environmental regulaOOns includmg the Endangered Spectes Act, the Nat10nal H,stonc Pre&ervat1on Act ( NHPA) and the General Confonnlty Rule for the Clean Air Act The USEPA has chosen to use the Cahfornra EnvrronmenlBI Quality Act ( CEQA) as the compliance base for California "• SRF Loan Program in addlt10n to compliance with the ESA NHPA and CAA Collectively , the Slate Water Resources Control Board calls these requirements CEOAPlus The State Water Resources Control Board , Drvr•"'" of Frnanc, al Assistance, is a Responsible Agency that will act on behalf of the USEPA to review and consrder the CEQA document before
approving the proJect' s lundrng The Board w,11 make fmdrngs as lo the adequacy of the CEOA document and distnbute the applicant' s CEOA document to selected federal agencies for reVJeW and comments before making a determination on adequacy The CEOA document 10 also transmitted to the State Clearinghouse for stale agency review as part of the CEOA process .

Addrt,onal environmental analyses are required for federal complranca a5Soc,ated wrth the CEOA- Plus process for the SRF loan application for the proposed Banning wastewater treatment plant expans, on and Phase I recycling water system- Endangered Spec,es Act; General Conformity Rule of the Clean Air Act; Nat,onal Historic Preservation Act , Sect,ons 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act ( Wetland Protect, on); Coastal Zone Management Act Farmland Protect, on Policy Act; Floodplain Management; and , Wdd and Scemc R,vers Act The environmental analyses for applicable federal consultation processes are underway and wrH be locluded in the CEOA- Plus documentation that will accompany the SRF loan appltcat. 10n Supporting informatton for federal requirements is included"'· or appended to this tnaial Study .

The purpose of the protect is to provrde the exrs~ ng Banning WWTP with capability to produce recycled water in accordance wtth Title 22 of the Cal~01ma Code of Regulations . The proposed pro,ect would provrde a recycled water drstributron system to meet the ongomg and pf'Cllected water supply needs for the Sun Lakes and Five Bndges housing areas The proposed prOJect would enable
availabrlrty and use of recycled water, whtch "' not available In Banning at thrs tune Recycled waler would be used pnmarily for irrigation of street medians, greenbelts. parks and golf courses.

Surplus recycled water available dunng certain t1rnc1 of the year would be stored rn reservoirs for future use or percolated into the East Banmng groundwater aquifer
Pipeline construct10n would typ,cally include trenchrng to a depth of approximately five feet in a conidor approxrmately frve feet wtde , placing of bedding m;oterral, layrng of pipe backfilling the !ranch and repaving the street or restoring landscaping . While construction of up lo a 2,000-foot segment of prpeline would be anticipated at any 8 1133

1.1 2 Operation
w,wons ,._,
one time , approximately 1.000 linear feet of open trench Is expected to occur at any hme While some tempcirery lane cJosures may be required , closures of entire roads would not be expected during lhe construction penod . Construction vehicles and equipment would be staged onsIte and would not require street closures. lnstallabon of the recycled water pipeline would be required to be separaled from the potable water pipeline by a d1&lance of 10 feet, as required by lhe Calrfornia Department of Health Services ( DHS), unless special matenals and constructlOO methods are used.

Construcllon of the tanks would require SIie cleanng grading and excavatJon No demolrtion of any structures , s anhc,pated Construction of the water storage tank would require excavallon of up to approximately ten fee t of earth from the 1urface to construct the foundation and prepare the subsurface s01I for the new faclirt1es .

An 1,800-gallon sodium hypochlonte lank would be constructed Although temporary road closures would not be expected during the construction perlOd . temporary lane closures may be required for pipeline installatoon. Construction vehicles and equipment would be staged onsrte and would not require street clo,iures
The construction penod for the Proposed PrOJecl would be approXJmately two years . Expansion of the Banning WWTP would requwe approximately eight ffiQllths, and may occur concurrently with pipeline construclion
As shown on Figure 5, the treatment train for the MBR process includes hquld and &0ltds as follows ·
Liquid handling units would incorporate headworks. fine screens anox,c and aerobic tanks , chlorine contact tan!< and percolat10n ponds .

The sohds handling units are dis50fved air flotatJon ( DAF ). anaerobic digesters and sludge drying beds
F1II[
CQITACr
IANt(S
At M·
11,q<W
mcmt•
1 Figure 5. MBR Process Train
9 The influent pump. DAF c1rculaIion sludge pumps and skimmer and d'!)ester mixing , end sludge circulattcm pumpa would operate 24 hours per day Operabon of Iha expanded Banning WWTP and the proposed recycled water pipelines and resefVOlrs would be managed by the Crty of BaMiny Public Utilrties Department

1.13 Related Projects A variety of housmg , inatd.ubonaJand retail development pn;,Jects are ongoing and planned in the vicir.rty of the Proposed PrOject Table 1 KlenlIf, es related prOjeclS that are planned . approved , "' under construcilOn in the prqect area Figure 4 shows the locatt0n& of related proJects in the area of the Proposed PrOjeci
Table 1. Related Projects in the Vicini!~ of the Proposed Proj ect Dwelling I
Ye rof
Pro-~ Owner Unitsfdul Acrel• I Con truction
Pa1dee Homes flullemetd 5.400 1522 t
TBD -
Biacl< Bench Rench 1500 1488 TBD
Lennar Fr;e Budges 2 1eo 548 I- 200B_
Banning Bench Lama Lulda 9-44 000 TBD
Mopar Drag C,cy .. eo 2008
Sun La\ es ( Commeraal} 47 2008
BaMng BUS# ll!llss Genier - 9 2006
Smith Creek P111< -
TBD lo be detannined
150 J ~
The Proposed PrOJecl is designed 10 provide recycled water storage and transm1Ss10n ptping to accommodate future growth , n the Banning a, ea Several houo,ng development pfOjeCts in the area I e . Sun Lakes and Five Bndges) have been odenhfied as potential benef1oanes of the Proposed Proiect
The City ol Banning Is in various stages of approving four specific plans ! Of new residential communrties that will add almost 10,000 new dwelling units to the C11y These new subd1v1slons also incorporate land for parks and open space , golf courses . medical offices schools commercial centers , and quasI-pubhc uses such as churches and fire staloons In addition to these four maJOf development d1ScU$ sad below a number of i.mall subdivisions ranging , n size from 10 lols lo 484 lots are In vanous stages of planning approval and/or construction .

P11rct.. Hom• Sutt• rfi-'d O. v.,opment
Pardee Homes has an app,oved specific plan . development agfl!ement . and environmental impact report to build a ma)Or new community within the Crty of Banning on 1,552 acru of land east of Highland Spnngs Road and north of VV\lson A""'1Ue. This approved development includes 5.400 d"--eAing units However, Pardee Homes Is currently ree><ammIng thi• plan and cor,s1denng revisions that wiU change all houslng within the development to a1nyle- fam~y dwellings The riew commun~ y IS approved for a 193- acre gotr course . 20 acres of commercial development . 5 acre• of med ical offices , 75 acres of p.ar1< land . a new school , and f,re stat10n 10 1134
Black B,mch R•nch Dev,,/ opment
A specrt1c plan for the development of Black Bench Ranch has been approved along wrth the environmental impact report for the development . That EIR Is currently under legal challenge As designed , the ranch' s 1,488 acres will be developed with a maximum ol 1,500 homes at a den 11ty of about 3 units per acre .

The remainder of the ranch will include a new school site, 81 acres of parl< s and trails , and 869 acres of open space A new roadWay system will provkte access and c,rculabon for the ranch k>cated on the mountain bench at Banning'& north ern bounda, y.
l•nnar FiYII Brfdgn Ottv,, lopment
Lennar has proposed a new community on 548 acres of land located west of Sunset Avenue south of the Interstate 10 and the Union Pacific Railroad nght- ol-way. The draft specific plan and dran EIR are under publi<: review Included m the development are

2. 160 residences , mostly comp rised of s,ngle-family dwellings wrth densotoes ranging from 3 units an acre lo 8 unrts per acre There are about 95 pa tio homes and 273 townhouses at a higher densrty. along with 51 .6 acres of commercial retai l space, 106 2 acres of parks and open space. and a site for a new fire stattOn A ma,or mprovement included as part of this development rs the
co nstruction of a grade separation between the Union Pacific Raolroad tracks and Sunset Avenue The grade separation is being designed and 1s scheduled to beg, o construction in 2008. nnlng Bench Lom• Linda Property Oev. lo,,,,,. nt
Approximately 600 acres of land on the north mountain bench east of Sunset Avenue has been approved for construction of 844 singlefam, ty homes and 100 Closter homes, a 16 2-acre village centerw, th commercIcJI and quasi.public uses, and 325 acres of recreation and open space, including a new golf course v11th clubhouse and dnvtng range
Mopar Drag City
Drag City . under conslruct ion Iust south of the Banning Municipal Airport runway , will be Southern California' s first profesS1onal drag strip lo be bui lt in over 40 years This venue will include a track surface . lights for night racing . and a depressed deS1gn to I1m,I the impact of noose on adjacenl area, Drag City will include a quartermtle regulation drag st rop and bleacher seating for up I<> 10.000 people on about 60 acres
Sun Lak11• ComnNrt:i•IProject
The Sun Lakes Specific Plan includes 47 acres of vacant land no rth of the Sun Lakes residentoal subdivision and south of Interstate 10 This acreage . east of the Albertson' s/K-Mart Shopping Plaza on Highland Springs Avenue . woulc: f be developed fo r commercial uses Plans for thlS acreage would include an auto mall along the freeway and medica l office s along Sun Lakes Boulevard . 11 1.14

1.15 Surrounding
Land Uses and
Setting
Other agencies
whose approval
is required
Banning Busin• 5• C•nlflr
The Banning Business Center is a new business park that will offer condominium space to office, light manufacturing and service retail users Located on 9 acres at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Lincoln Street the business park has access to Interstate 10 from the 8th Street e,ut, which is grade-separated from the Union Pacific Railroad tracks ( City ol Banning . 2007c)
Smith Cl' Hk P•rlt
The Ctty of Banning has developed a Master Plan for pass, ve and active space al the 150- acre Smith Creek Parl< site located at the eastern terminus of Porter Road , north and south of Smith Creek southeast of the Banning WWTP The regional part< would include equestnan facilities , trails. stables , trailer part< ing. a grandstand , a riding nng . storage pen , locker facilities fishing lake, dock community center p1C0Ic and recreational vehicle camping faCllihes amphithealer, 1ennIs and basketball courts, dnving range , swimming pool , commercial retail center, restaurants and a hotel . A schedule for th1S development has not been established ( City of Banning . 2007a).

Airport rural restdential , vacant land, and mixed , nduslnal , ms,11tut10nal, commercial uses
State Water Resources Control Board . County of Riverside Transportat, on and Land Management Agency and Planning Department. Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District , City of Banning .
12 1135
Env ironment,,! Factors Potentially Affedecl:

The enviru""""' lal factors checked below would be potentially affected by this pmjed. lnwlviog at least one imp,,ct that is a "PolenliaHy Significant Impact' as indicated by the checklist on the following page.

O Aesthetic&
0 Biolog·cal Re9ources
0 Hazards & Hazardous Materials
0 Mineral Resources
0 Public SetV!ces
Utilkles / Service Systems
Agricultural Resources
0 Cultural Resources
Hydrology / Water Qualify
Noise
D Recreation
Air Quality
a Geology / Soils
Land Use /Planning
D Popula~ on /Housing
D Transportation ( Traffic
a Mandatory Findings of Signiricanca
Dat1trminallon: { To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis orthis Initial evaluation:
t find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a slgnif,cant effect on the environmen~ and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
li!I Ifind that although the proposed project could have a significant elfect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions In the project have be@n made by or agreed to by lhe project proponent A MrTtGATEO NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

D I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on lhe enwonmen~ and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required .

I find that the proposed project MAY have a • potentially significant impact" or " potentiaDy signJficant unless mitigated" impact on the envirorvnent, but at least one effect , ) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pur.,uant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addres,, ed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis a. desaibed on attached sheets. Ari ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but It must analy2:e only the effects hot remain to be addrassed.

I fllld that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment. because . ill potentially significant effects ( a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EtR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standwds, and ( b) havw been avoided or mitigated pur.<uanl to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, includifl! I revisions or mitigation measu- that are imposed upon the proposed project, nolhing further is n,quired. 4,--< ~~
Paul Toor
Printed Name
13 Oate7
qLu/02
City ofBanning
Water/ Wa., tewer Utilities Dept
For
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1)
2)
3)
4 )
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
A brief explanation is required for all answers except " No Impact'' answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parenthese• following each question . A "No Impact" answer Is adequately supparted 1f lhe referenced mformat, on sources shlffl that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one invol\ led ( e .g., the project falls outside a fau lt rupture zone). A '"No Impact"' answer should be explained where it is based on pro;ect-specific factors as well as general standards ( c .g . the proI.-ct will not expose sensrt, ve receptors to pollutants , based on a proiect- specific screening analys, s) All answers mu•t taKe account of the whole action involved , 1ncludmg oll-s~e as we ll as on-srte , cumulative as well as project- level , indirect as well as direct . and construction as well as operational impacts
Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur. then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact Is potentially significant , less than significant wrth mitigation. or less than significant " Potentially Sign,f,cant Impact" Is appropriate if there is substantial eVJdence that an effect may be significant If there are one or more " Potentially Significant lmpacf' entries when the determination is made an EIR is required .

Negative Declaration : Le"' Than Significant With M~1gabon Incorporated'' applie• where the ncorporabon of mitIgatIon measures has reduced an effect from '' Potenhally Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact • The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures and brieHy expla in how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level { mitigation measures from " Earlier Analyses," as descnbed m (Sl below may be cross-referenced).

Earher analyse,, may be used where pursuant to the tienng program EIR , or other CEQA process , an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or ni!gative deciarat, on Section 15083( c)(3)(D) In this case. a brief discussion should identify the following a) Earlier Analysis Used . Identify and state where they are avai able for revio,w . b) Impacts Adequately Addressed . Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant lo applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mrt,gat10n measures based on the earlier analysis
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated ." describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the project
Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate mto the checic:list refere nces to information sources for potenbal impacts ( e g . general plans . zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate , mclude a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substan\ Jated
Supporting lnfonnation Sources . A source list should be attached , and other sources used or individuals contacted should be crted m the discussion .

This is only a suggested form . and lead agencies are tree to use different formats : however, lead agencies should n0<mally address lh<o quest10ns from th., checklist that are relevant to a proJO'Cl's environmental effect& In whatever format •• selected .

The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance cntena or threshold , 1f any. used lo evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified , 11 any, to reduce the impact to less than signWicance 14 1136
SECTION 2. CEQA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
The EnvIronmen1al Checkhst and di&cuss10n of potential environmental effects were completed in accordance with Section 15063( d)3 of the California Environmental Quality Act Gurdelines, 1998, lo determine 1f the proposed pr01ect may have any signrfica nl impacts on lhe environment A bnef explanation is provided for all determinations A "No Impact· or "Less Than S1gn1focent Impact· detetmination is made when the project would not have any impact or wouk:1 not have a s,gmficant effect on lhe env1ronment tor lhat issue area, respectrvely, based on a prfliect- spectfic analysis LHS Tb•n
Potentially SignH' icant Lff• Than
Poten t &al Impacts Signirtunt With Slgnlfictnl
Impact Mrtigattan Impact No Impact
lncorpor' 11d
I. Aesthetiu. Would the P,"!ltCI
a) Have a sub&tanhal adverse ellecl on a scenoc X
vista'
While the City of Bimrimg General Plan does not evaluate aesthetics as a plarinrng element the City 's land use pofocIes encourage the preservation of ridgehnes , watercourses . washes and greenbe lts.

Implementation of the Genera l Plan , Zoning Ordinance and other regulatory mechanrsms will help to promote cons•rvation w1lhon the City of Ban ning. There are no designated scernc v,stas rn the City of Banning
The Proposed ProIec1 area south of lhe 1-10 freeway Is relatively Ila~ with the Sari Bernardino Moontain• servrng as a scenic backdrop The pro1ect setting is generally 1ndustnal wrth rura l residential and agncultura l uses. There are no scenic vistas on the project area The proposed expa nsion of the Banning W-NTP and construction of recycled water pipelines wo uld not obstruct general vIew5 of the mountains or other scentc aspects of the area. All recycled wa ler pipelines would be located underground and would not ad\/ersely affect any scenic views The effect of the Proposed ProJect on scenoc 111stas would be considered less thari significant. b) SubstantoaRy damage scenoc resources ,
including but not limrted to trees rock X
outc:roppmgs , and historic buildings within a
state scenic highway?
There are no State- or County- designa ted scenic highways with in the proiect area Although expansion of lhe Banning WNrP will be v1s1ble to some degree In the local area this visual impact would not be considere< l a substantial degradation of the visual quahty of the area Therefore Impacts to scenic resources from the Proposed PrOfecl would be consrdered less than significant c) Substantoally degrade the 8Jlistong visual X
character or ~ualrty of the srte and rts
surroundmgs?
The pTOject selbng within the Crty of Banning Is prima rily industrral with rural res,dential and agrocultural land uses in the voc m~y The proposed exp.1nsoon of the Banning WNTP would be visible in the local area , but would not result in a substantoal degradat ion of the visual quahty of thu area All plpehnes would be purple ( pain ted purple , constructed of purple pipe or w1lh purple bagging), located underground and would not adversely affect l he existing vuiual qualtty of the project area . Com;.trucUon of the recycloo waler pipeline may degrade the visual quality of the project area dunng construction actlvolJes , but th is situation would be temporary and considered less than significa nt 15 Lost Th•11
PotentlAlly Signific. ant Les.Ii Than
Pot& ntial Impacts S's,nrfteant With Significal\ l
Impact Mltl~ ion lmpect Nolmpltet
lncorp« i1ted
The Proposed Project 1YOuld not result In any conflicts with plans and policies for preservation of open space . and would not. adverHly Impact the visual character and qualrty of the prtlject area The Proposed ProJecl would not substantially degrade the visual character of the site and Its surroundings d) Create a new sou rce of substan1IaI hght or X
glare. which would adver&ety affect day or
noghtume v,ews m the area7
Tho developed portIoos of Bannrn g exh1brl typocal urban source s of hght and glare. Construcbon act111itIes woul d occur pnmanty durong dayhght hours· therefore , no new sources of artrficIal hghtrng would be necessary during construciion at the WWTP or along the pipeline route The proposed WWTP expansion area would be equipped with artrfic1al hght1rig for security purpo~ s This new hghlmg would be directed inward and not adversely affect day or nighttime v,ews in the area Therefore, impects from light and glare would be considered less than signifocant. ti. Agriculture Resources.. In determ, nmg whether vnpacts to aguculture rl!aources are s1gmhcant env,ronmental el!ecls , lead agencies may re•er to the Cal1fornIa Agncutlural Land Evaluation and S~e A,sessmenl Model ( 1997) prepared by the Caloforn1a Dept of ConservaLoo a• an optoonal model to use 1n assessing moact, on agncv. lture and farmland WouJd the prO)ect a) Convert Prvne Farmland Unique Farmland .
or Farmland of Statewide Importance X
Farmland) as shown oo the maps prepared
pu rsuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monrtonng Program of the Cata0<noa
Resource& Agency to non-agricultural use7
The State of Ca liforn ia Department of Conservatton D,visJOn of Land Resources has surveyed land as part of Ifs Farmland Mapping and Mon itonng Program Masi of the Crty of Bannrng south ol the 1-10 os classified as Oeveloped or Built-up Land Tile proposed recycled water line would cra&s land that Is classified as Williamson Ad - Non•Pnme Agricultural Land from Sunset Avenue to Sun Lakes housmg.

Other areas of the Proposed Pf'Oject are nol m the Wilhamson Act Program The Proposed PrOJ8cl would not resu lt in conversion of farmland . Impacts to farmland would be considered less than significant
b) Coofloct with aX1Shng zoo111g f0< agrrcuKural X
use. or a Williamson Act contract?
There are no Withamson Ad contracts rn plac,;, for lhe affected p'Oject area The refore. the Proposed Proiect would not result on any conthcts to eXJstmg zoning or Williamson Act contracts C) Involve other changes in the exIshng
environment lhat, due lo their locabon or X
nature. could result in eonverstan of
Farmland, to non-agncuftural use?
The Proposed Pr01ect would not result rn the conversoon of farmland rnto non -agricultural uses The impact of the Proposed Protect on farmland would be consKlered less than significant Ill. Air Quality: Where ava,lable the S'!Jnihcance croter,a eslabhshed by the applocable arr quahty management or a~ poUutoon control dIstnct may be reJ.ed upon to make tile lollowtng determ, nai.ons Would lhe DrO!ecl
16 1137
L85& Than l.ettTh• h
Pot. ontillty Slgnlflunt LM- a Than
Potitnttll lmpa, clS SJgnmcant With Significant
Impact Mititption Impact No Impact
lncorporatOd
Pob! ntlially Slgnlftunt Less Than
PottH' IU.al impact& Signiftc; anl With Signff" ICiilnl Impact Mitigation Impact No knpact
lncorporatad
a) Conflct wth or obstruct implementi111011 of X
he epphcable air quality plan,
The prOfecl area is located 1n Salton Sea Air Basin and managed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Dist rict The nearest monitonng stallon II the Banning Atr Quality Monitoring Station The Proposed Project would resu ll m temporary air pcllutant emissions during construct, on of the expanded WV'/TP and pipelines, as shown on Table 2 The construclion•related air pollutant emissions would nol result m any conflict or obstruclion with lhe object ives o, implementat, on of the South Coast Air Qualtly Management DISlrict ( SCAQMD) Air Oual~ y Management Plan Impacts to air quality are The area Is classifJed as a non- attainment area for ozone precursors ( re active organic compounds and nitrogen oxides) and particulate matter. The net increase in emissions of these pollutants that would be attributed lo const ruction of the Proposed Proiect woul d not be expected to exceed federal or state standards no r would they be considered cumulatively considerable. consfdered less than significant . d) E- sens~,ve receptors to substanllal X Table 2. Estimatod Air Pollutant Emission, from the Proposed Expansion of the Banning WWTP polllltanl concentra11ons? and Construction of Phase I Recycled Water Pipelines
The nearest sensitive receptors to the site are rural residences 1mmed1ately we• t of the 16-acre Emissions ilbldav, expansion site west of the Banning WNTP ( the re are no S<:hools or hospitals within O5 m ile of the Sourc• co ROG NOX SOX PM10 WV'/TP) None of Che residenls are expected to be exposed to substantial construction-related ExpanSKln of Banl"MOQ WWTP 5 74 1 13 14 00 1.48 31 .65
Installation of P,ip6lIne rrom ' Well R 1 0 .00 0 00 009 0 00 4.87 potlutants as a result of the Proposed Project. Impacts to sensitiv<! receptors would be considered less than significant.
ln:. lallabon of PIpehne ta Sun Lake$ 0 .09 000 0 .17 0 .00 72. 78 TOia/ 5. 83 1.13 14 .26 1.48 109, 30
SCAQMD Thrwhold llb/davl I 550 75 100 I 150 150
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a X
substantial number of people?
No activities woul d occur and no matenals or chemicals would be stored on- site , that wo uld have the CO -= carbon monoxtde potential to cause odor impacts during pr01ect activities at lhe srte Sod ium hypochlonte would be ROG = roacIrve organic gases
NOX , nitroge,, oxides
SOX = sulfur oxides
PM10 = parbculate matter less than 0< equal to 10 microns , ndJametet' stored on site for use in the treatment proceS$ This matenal would be stored m a closed system and would not be expected to cau se odors Therefore . adverse odor mpacts affecting a substantial number of people would not be expected to occur.

Particulate matler emissions shown on Table 2 do not reflect watenng for dust control Although IV. Biological Resources . Would the pr01ect impacts to air quahly are considered less than significant. emiss, ons of particulate matter can be reduced by approximately 50 percent with watering for dust control ( a slandard construction practice ) a) Have a substantial adverse effect , either X directly or through h11bitat modiftcat10ns, on
b) VIOiate any air quality standard Of conlnbute X any spec, e 1dentifoed as a candidate. substenlially lo an eX1stIng or projected air sensit, ve or special status species In local or quahty VIOiation? regional plans, policies, or regulations , or by the California Department ol Fish and Game
The Proposed Proiect would resutt m the generation of air conta minant emIss, ons that would result from or U S Fish and Wildlife Service? the use or conslructron equipment and construction workeT vehic les ( Table 2). These emissKJns would not exceed SCAOMD significance threshold• Construction acttvities would be temporary and would The pro1ect area w~ m the Banning city hmrts Is characte rized by industrial and rural residential uses not be expected to result m any adverse. long- term efll! Cls on air qualrty because the generalion of "" The pro, ect area wa s surveyed by a qualified biolog, st In April 2007 . The Proposed Project would pollutants pnmarily associated With temporary co nstruction activities would be l1 m1ted to pIpelI118 include cons truc tion ( e g .. ground d,sturbance) at four locat10ns, as described herein ins talla tion Impacts lo air quality from construct10n of the Propcsed ProJect would be considered less than sig nificant. Once the project has been completed , it is e$1imated that there wo uld be no net change In operational vehicles that woukt lravel w,thm the &ervIce area . The impacts to air quality from exhaust emissions from these vehicles would be conside red less than sigmfica nt The Well R1 srte anti , ts associated pipeline to the 16-acre expansion site a,e inside the Ba nning WWTP property fenceine and have been partially cleered. An existing dirt road pl'OVl< les accesi; to the percolation po nds and Well R1, which is located upon ftal ground. Atthough the dirt ro ad is heavily traveled , this area Is characterized by presence ol bu ckwheat { Eriogonom fascicu/ a /um), C) Result m a cumulatively con11derable net filaree ( Erodium sp ) and m ustard ( Brass, ca sp ). Lark sparrow ( Clmt> do"'6s grommncu5), Incr& ase of any cntena pcllutant for wh, ch the western kingbird ( Tyrarmus verticalis), killdeer ( Charadnus voc1/orous) and Jach rabbit ( Lepus prOJeCt regton 1& non-attainment under an X
apphcable federal or otale ambtent air quality
ca/ifom, cus) wera observed on Apnl 4 2007 . Small burrows west of the we R may be used by pocl< et mouse gpecies The area may poten tially seive as habitat for lour ,; pecies considered standerd ( 1nclud1ng releasing eml5sions that
excoed quantitative thresholds for ozone
sensitive by the Ca lifornia Natura l Diversity Data Base ( CNDDB): San 01Bgo black- tailed jack rabbit ( Lepus californicus / Jonnar/ 11), paO !d San Diego pocket mouse ( CllaelodlPUS fat/ax p,ecursors)? pahtdus). Los Angeles pocket mouse ( Perognalhus / ong1membris brevinaws), and coa st Sa n Diego horned hzard ( Pllrynosoma coronatum blai1wtlle1). None of these four Ca~fornia Species of Special Concern ( CSC) were observed on April 4, 2007 17 18
1138
otonllal Impacts
Potonll• lly
SlgnJflcant
lmpa. ct
U! uThan
Significant
WUh
MJtlgatlcn
lneorporalod
UssThan
Slgnlflc. ant
Impact I No lmpai;, t
The 16-acre expansion site west of the existing Bann ing 1/WvTP is generally flat with domestic olive trees ( Olea europaea) that have been planted along two sides of the field as hedgerows.

The property is mowed twice yearly. Vehicular traffic along a perimeter road into the Banning Animal Shelter e,osses the parcel near its southern boundary. Plants found on the site include Califr, rnia crolon ( Croton ca/i(omicus), mustard, yellow fiddleneck ( Amsinckia sp.), sun cup Camissonia sp .) and annual gmsses . Common raven ( Corvus corax), American crow ( Corvus brachyrliynchos) and burrows of California ground squirrel ( Spenoophilus beeclley,} were observed on the site on April 4 , 2007 . No burrowing owls ( Athene cunicularia) were seen flying or posting on dirt mounds on April 4, 2007, and no ground squirrel burrow had indirect evidence of burrowing owts inhabiting this s~e.

The proposed recycled water pipeline corridor from the Banning 1/WvTP to Sunset Avenue would be constructed entirely on paved surfaces , primarily in residential areas. A natural gas pipeline and water supply line are located beneath Lincoln Street ( and other streets along this route).

Biological resources are limited to annual , introduced species common to urban areas.

The proposed recycled water pipeline corridor from Sunset Avenue to the Sun Lakes housing area would be constructed on a gravel surface comprising the extension of Westward Avenue.

This access road experiences frequent vehicular traffic and bisects ! he proposed Five Bridges housing property. Atthough a corridr, r south of the roadway is fenced, this property is used for cattle grazing. Utility fines ( gas and fiber optics) are located on the north side of Westward Avenue, with an aboveground , suspended sewage pipe crossing to the south side of the roadway near the wash of Smith Creek . A series of bridges provide the roadway r:Ner the large wash . Wildlife observed on April 4, 2007 included Say' s phoebe ( Sayomis saya), mourning dove Zenaida macrouro), European starting ( Stumis vu/garis), Brewer' s blackbird ( Euphagus cyanocephalus), crow, raven , and tur1< ey vulture ( Calharloo aura). Although evidence of pocket gopher ( T/lomomys bollaa) was observed, the dirt shoulders of the road contain no biological resources of concern .

The USFWS identified 15 federally protected species known to inhabit locales in the general region of the City of Banning . With the exception of Stephen' s kangaroo rat and mountain yellow- legged frog , none of these species occur any closer than 3 miles from the project site ( most are known only from very considerably farther away than 3 miles from the project site).

Stephen' s kangaroo rat { Dipodomys slephensi}, a federal- listed endangered and state- listed threatened species, generally occurs in annual and perennial grasslands, but has also been found to inhabit sparse coastal sage scrub or sagebrush plant assemblages. This small mammal requires areas with well- drained, gravelly or sandy soil for digging their burrows. Stephen' s kangaroo rat has been recorded on the Five Bridges housing site . CNDDB records show one entry, from April 1939, representing one an imal now in the coflecti<> ns at the Museum of Vertebrale Zoology at Berkeley . No further information about the localion or burrows 81 this local Ion was recorded in 1939. During the site reconnaissance conducted in April 2007, burrows were found which probably were dug by kangaroo rats . The location of each burrow is shown in Appendix D (Biological Resources Survey Report). None of the burrows are closer than 950 ft to the proposed alignment on Westward Avenue. These burrows are al a sufficient distance from the proposed trench on Westward Avenue and would not be affected by the Proposed Project.

Suilabte habitat for Stephens' kangaroo rat does not occur along the heavily uUJized access roadway between Sunset Avenue and the Sun Lakes housing area. The Proposed Project would not result in Joss of habitat for this species because the pipeline would be installed in existing roadways.
19 Potsitiilll Impacts
Potentlally
Significant
Impact
uss. Than
Slgnlfieant
Wilh
Mklgat1on
lnc:.or()Ol"•led
lee• Th• n
Significant
Impact I No Impact
Yehow- Jegged frog ( Rana mucosa), a true frog ( Family Ranidae) hsled by the USFWS as endangered but without formal listing by the Stale This species always occurs very near water .

A single occurrence of this species within O2S mile of the prtl) ecl s~e ,s from a colleci• on made m 1925 al a vaguely de= ibed locale The • pecIes possibly has been extirpated from this locale The mapped occurrence ( shown as 1.0 mile in radius) would intersect the pro1ect area only along L1RCOln Street at about San Gorgonio Avenue. The Proposed Project would no! result in loss of habitat for this specteS because lhe pipeline would be installed m existing roadways No evidence of any special status species was observed along the proposed ar,gnment of the pipeline west on Lincoln Street lo Sunset Avenue , south on Sunset to Westward Avenue , west on the north shoulder of We•tward Avenue) The vibration from ! ranching does not propagate very far through alluvial sediments such as occur along Westward Avenue Therefore , there would be no concern for kangaroo rats that may 1nhab1l burrows several hundred meterr. north of Westward Avenue. Vibrations propagated through the ground would not influenCEI birds . Noise generated by d1e&el engines of tracked excavators , front loaders and other construction vehicles would likely dnve birds away from the immediate vicinity but no! otherwise cause effects The City would ensure that lhe follow, ng mihgahon measures to avoid or m1nm1ze habitat disturbance would be incorporated mto project design and planning ·
Pipeline design will be limited to the disturbed shoulders ol 11,e exislmg roadway along Wostward Avenue. Placement ofrecycled water pipclH1e in any washes or crocks wdl bo ovoK1od A qualified b,o/ogist will be present dunng / renchir1g lo mooilor ground dtslurbanco lo ensun, / hat cons/ruction V9'1teles do nol slroy, or maler, als placed, north of Weslwan1 Av9nue into grasslands of margmat quality but where kangaroo rat burrows might occur notth of the prcyect site
P1(J8line 1nslalli1lron along Westward Avenue from Sunset Av9nue to the Sun Lakes housing area would be conducted by minimiz, ng the wKil/J of the trench corridor to fess than 5 feel, wherever possible.

Cons /ruction Jaydown and slaa,ng areas would be sited atona nea,by paved road surlaces Bfld would no/ be IOC8/ed upon any u1><:hs/urbed nalural areas To a\/0/d polent1a/ impacts . construct, on wcrlr limirs would be clearly designated on corJStruction plans and spec,1ica/,ons.

To retain natl\'11 plan/ mateool, any lopsod removed from the s1le would be stockpiled, covered and replaced on-s,le, as much as possible Dum,g pipeltr1e cons/llJCtion , any non-pavad amas I/Jar Bro trenched would be rotumod to tho,r ar,gmal concilt,on followmg prpeline mstat/at,on lmplementahon of these mIt,gat1on measures would avoid impacts to listed species . With 1mplementalion ol these mi11gahon measures . the proposed proJect would not adversely affect hsted and sensitive species known to occur m the vicinity
bl Have a substantial adverse effect on any
ripanan hab~ al or other sensitive natural
community 1dent1fied m local or reg,onal
plans , poltctes and regu latlOOS. or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or
the U S F ,sh and Wildlife Service?
X
The pf0J8Ct SIies do not con tain npanan habrtal Pipelines would be constructed wIthIn existing roadways and not Within drainage areas . Impacts to ripanan t1ab1tat or other sens11:, ve natural commumt1es would be con5idered less than :significant
20 1139
lee• Than Less Than
PotontiaUy Signifit~ nt LIi•• Than
Potential lmpKts Slgnltk: ant Wllh SigrOficant
Impact Mttlg, IUon lmpocl Ho Impact
Incorporated
Potentially Significant lns Than
Potential Impacts Significant With Slgntticam
Impact Mklgotlon Impact No Impact
lncorporat..lKI
c) Have a substantial ad\lerse effect on
federally p1otec1ed wetlands as defined by X
Secuon 404 ol lhft Clean Water Act
including but not hmrted to , marsh vernal
pool coastal, etc ) through direct removal ,
filling , hydrological interruption, or othe.-
means?
The Proposed Project would not s,gn,ficantly alter lhe ex1Sbng setting, or remove any significant habitat or b10logical resources At this lime , the proJect area ,snot wdhin an area des1gnat~ for conservation or management under lhe MSHCP The Five Bndges site is nol considered to be an integral part of any reg ional or 01herwise idenbfied wildlife eotridor ( Impact Sciences. Inc .. 2006). Tne proposed recycled water pipeline corndor is not loceted w~h1n habitat or fee area fur any hsled species Therefore , lhe Proposed Project would not conflict wrth the MSHCP or any other eX1sting conservation plan .

A JunsdictKmal dehneation of resources defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act was conducled on 2004 This dehneabon identified drainages associated with Pershing and Smith Creeks which run lhrough the proposed Five Bndges property The proposed recycled water pipeline comdor would be placed within the existing access road ( Westward Avenue). None of the proposed pipeline segments V . Cultural Resources Would the nr""' ct
a) Cause a substantial adwrae change 1n the X
s,gnif,cance of a historical resource es
or other proposed factlit1es would be Sl!ed w1th,n U.S Army Corps of Engineers- defined wetlands The deflned m § 15064 5? Proposed Project would not result in physical modifications or placement of facilities in. or aclJacent to , streams , flood control channels or wetlands A cultural resources 1nvesligahon was conducted for the prQJect area ( CRM Tech 2007). This investigation included a records search to determine the extent of previous cultural resource d) lnll!rf""' subst,mt,ally w1tti the movement of
any native resident or m,grator; fish or X
wlldhfe species or w~h established na11v
mvestigalians m the area Archaeological srte records historic maps listing of resources on the Nal!onal Register of Hi,tonc Pt; oe< 1s ( NRHP ) Cal~ornta R"!lister of Historic Resources ( CRHR).

Califom1a Points of Historical Interest, Celiforn, a landmarl< s , end National Histonc Landmarl< s were resident o, migrator; wildlife corndo, 1, o, rev1ewed to determine whether any archaeological sltes or architectural re&aurces exist 1n the project impede lhe use of native wildlife nursery
SIies?
area Results of the records search revealed that no hislor, c properties ( resources listed on or determined eligible for ! Isling on the NRHP or CRHR) are located w~hin or adjacent to the project area However, during the field survey, one prelltously unrecord ed h1stonc- penod 1¢8, 33-16207 was The Proposed ProJect would not be expected to interfere with movement of small mammals. The irJenllfied within the APE Site 33-16207 1s located on land once owned by waiter Hathaway. however, proposed recycled waler pipeline would be constructed within the existing roadways With some of the h1Storic landscape features are likely lo post-<jale Hathaway" s asscciation with the 1ncorporat1on of the mitigabon measures described in Section IV.a , impacts to w1ldlde mOllelllent would property . Therefore , Site 33, 16207 does not qualify as a historic property . The Proposed Proiect be considered less lhan significant. woulrJ nol res ult ., any adven; e change lo htsto,, cal resources e) Conffid Wllh ny local pol< coes or o,dinances b) Cause a substanlial adverse change in the X protecting b10logical resources , such as a X s1gmf..:ance of an archaeok>g1C81 resource tree p,eservatJon policy or ordinance? pursuant to§ 15064 57 The Proposed Pro1ect would not result 1n the need to remove any trees that are subject to local pohcies The cultural resources 1nvestigabon conducted for the protect area ( CRM Tech , 2007) k;lenti1ied one or ordinances . The Proposed Pl"Ofecl would not result m the removal of any coast live oak trees No preV1ously unrecorded htStonc- period s1le with potential archaeolog, cal significance. Site 33- 16206 ( CAconflicts with local policies or ordinances would be expected . Riv-8364). within the APE . Sile 33-16208 , a refuse deposit CO<'ltaming temporally and rnorpllologically I) Confloct w,th the prOIIIAion ol an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan Natural X
d1agnosllc consumer l\em5 from the 1920s- 1930s, has the potential to yield important archaeological dala The proposed p1pehne ahgnment would be located to avoid Srte 33-16208 Two miligat, on measures have been Idenbfied
Community Conservat100 Plan , or other
approved loeal, "' 9101lal or stale habitat . Tire pjpvlrrio from Woll RI lo tho Bannrng WWTP would be aligned lo avoid S11e 33-1620B. The conaervabon plan? C,ty would onsuro lhnt a quahfiod orchaeologrca/ monitor flags the boundaries of this site prior to The Proposed Pro1ect 11 not localed in a Cell Cell Group , or Subunit of lhe Weslern Riverside County Mulllple Spec,es Habilat Conservation Plan ( MSHCP). Developed by the Riverside County Transportation end land Management Agency in order to map wt potential resef'Ve areas for habitat conservation , the MSHCP 1s a comprehensive , multJiunsdictiooal effort that focuses on the conservation of 1 6 species . The MSHCP consists of a reserve syslem of approximately 500,000 acres of which approximately 347 ,000 acres are currenlly wilhin publ, c ownership and 153,000 acres any groundwork. and I/lat the mon;tor is present during pipeline trenching Bl this location. .

In tho event any archaoologrcol matenals or subsurface deposits are unearthed during eatlhmov, ng act111if195, the construction contracto,- would cease activity in /he affected sree (e .g., redirect activities mlo another area) until the discove, y can be evaluall! d by a qualtfiod atcl1aeo/ ogisl 01 ltislonc resources spec,ahst, as roq11ued and af)fJfOfXlate treatment meBSUres imp/emanled.
are currently in private ownership . The MSHCP includes 250 .000 acres of privately owned land proposed as potential criteria area, including the project s11e, and will utt1mately be reduced to 157,000 acres designated as habitat conservalton laorJ
W~h incorporation of these mitigat100 measures into the project, impacts to archaeological resources would be considered less than significant.
21 22
1140
c)
Potontltll Impacts
Directly 0< Indtrectly destroy a unique
paleontological rewurc: e or de or umque
geolog ic feature?
PO(ctnelJlty
Sig nificant
tmpac. t
Lon~·
Sl51nfflunt
With
Mitl910on
Incorporated
X
Ln11Thi1n
Significant
Impact I No Impact
Based on prev10u• and current investigatioos , no paleontological resources are known in the project area No fossil verti, brale locahloes have been idenlified lo date within or near lhe project area Although no paleontological resource• have been recorded , the proposed recycled water corridor along the extension of Westward A, enue ( from Sunset Avenue lo the Sun Lakes housing development) , s located m Pleistocene older alluvium. Similar Pleistocene sediments located m the reg10n have been found to have a high polential for paleontolog1c resources and. therefore lhe pa leontological sensi~ vity of the sile is considered to be high The occurrence of fossil sites m Pleistocene older alluviurn suggest• that there is a poten11al for additional similar, scientifically important fossil remains to be encountered m the project area. Excavations , nto older Pleistocene alluvium round near washes and flood control easements have previously encountered vertebrate fossils Earthmoving activrt1es associated with project construction . as well as the unauthonzec collection of foaall remains by construdion personnel , could result 1n the loss of prev10usty unrecorded fossil sites and the remains of extinct land mammal apecies This loss would be a significant adverse environmenlal , mpacl to paleo< 1totog, cal resources. To avoid potential impacts to paleonlologIcal resources , the 01Stnct would ensure that the mrt,gation measures described , n Section IV a are incOfPOfated into project planning ( these measures would re&trict ground disturbance to specified work areas). In addihon . the following miltgation would be implemented dwing constructionIn ffla event pa!oont. olog, cal resourcos aro ortc0untcrod during earthwork, tllo conslruct, on ccntractor would cease acltvity in Ille alfect9d area ( e g . rediroct activ1t, es into another area) mid a qualified paleontologist can evaluate / he discovery, and implement appropriate treatment mcnsures. The paleontologist wovld dotormino , f tho palcoolological matonal should be salvaged identified and permanoo/ ly pr&S9N8d Curotion of specimens mlo an accrec, t9d museum repository would be ccnducted by a qualified paleonloJogisl. who would also pn,pa,e a reporl offindmgs for the City ofBanning.

With mcorporalton of this mrtigat10n measure impacts to nonrenewable paleontologtc resources would be considered less than significant
d) Disturb any human remains . 1nclu< 1mg those
interred outside of formal cemeteries?
X
The Proposed Project 1s not e:xpected to encounter any human remains as a result of earthmoving act,v,ties A search of the Sacred Lands File by the NAHC did not indicate the presence of Native American cuftural resources in or near the prOjed area , and the project area is not otherwise known to be a previous cemetery or bunal site Therefore the probability of encountering human remains during project conslruct, on is unhkely To avoid potential impacts to human remains that may be buried beneath the surface 1n the work area . the City would ensure that the following mitigat10n measure 1s implemented ·
In the even/ human remains are encountered during project cons1t·11cllon, the R,ve, side County Coto,, e, shall be contacted to determine whether or not investiga/, on of the cause of death , s roqwrod In the evunt the romains oro NaltV9 American m ong, n, the Native American Hentage Commiss, on shall IJe contacrad lo determ, ne necessary procedures for pro/ eclioo and preservel, on of remains including reburial, as provided in the CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064. 5(e).
23 Less Then
Potantlally Slgnific. ant Leu Tha n
Potem 111 1mpact1 S~ nlflunt w ,u, Significant
Imp.ad Mltlgotlon Imp.act No lmpacl
lncorporatlld
With mcOfJ)Orat1on of this m1tigat1on measure . impacts to human remains would be considered less than significant.

Vt. Geoloav and Soils Would the O<otect
a) Expose people 0< structures to polenhat
substantial adverse effects, including the nsk
of toss , lllJury , or death 1nvolV111g
1) Rupture ol a known earthquake fault , as
delineated on the moat recent Alqu1St- Pr10lo
Earthquake Fautt Zoning Map issued by the X
State Geologist for the area or based on
other substentia l evidence of a known feult?
Refer to Division of M,nes and Geology
Sl)8Cl8I Pubhcation 42
There are no knmvn active faults wllh evidence of surface rupture extending across the prcposed site for the expans10n of the Banning WWTP. Active faults wI1h surface ruptu, e in the region of the pr01ect site include the San Bernardi no and Southern extens10ns of the San Andreas Faun tocated 9 kilometers from the site al its closest point. The pro1ecl s( e Is nol located withi n a currently established AlquistPnolo special studies zone ( Stale of California Fault Rupture Hazard Zone) ( Conv,. rse Consultants. 2007). Therefore. the potent ial for surfac,. fault rupture occurnng al the project srte , s considered to be low. The propooed WVVTP expans10n would be de&1gned to resist damage from an earthqual< e conforming to the requiremenls of the 1997 Uniform Building Code of International Conference of Build1119 OfficIals . The potential impact from rup ture of an earthquake fault ,. considered less than significant
11 ) Strong seismic ground shaking? X
ARhough no known active fault& are found , n the area. ground shaking from earthquakes associated with nealtly and distant tauHs may occur during the lifet, me of the prOJect ( Converse Consultants, 2007)
Although no known active faults are found in the area ground shaking from earthquake. s associated wrth nearby and distant fauns may occu, during the lifetime of the pro1ect ( Converse Consultants, 2007) Because earthquake- related hazards cannot be av01ded in the ooulhem Cahfornia region , the PJO/ ecl site could be sub1ected 10 seismic ground shaking Therefore. the potential impact from seismic ground shaking would be considered less than significant.

IN) SetSmic- related ground fa ~ure including X
hquelact10n?
The potential for seismic hazards due 10 lhe secondary effects of earthquakes including liquefact10n. In lhe prOfecl area 1s considered low (Converse Consultants.. 2007} Therefore . the impact from se1!1;micrelated ground failuie , 1nclud1ng ~ quefaction , would be considered less than sign~ 1cant.

IV) Landslides? X
The potential for seismic hazards due to the secondary effects or earthquakes including landslides, in the project area 1& considered low ( Converse Consuttants . 2007). Therefore , the impact from se,sm,crelated ground failu re, including landsbdes. would be considered less lhan significant 24 1141
Losa Ttwtn
Potentialty Significant LNsTnan
PotonUI. I Impacts SlgnlHeant With Significant
Impact Millgatlon Impact No Impact
lncorpofilled
LISg Than
PotM! tlalty Slg r,lflcanl Loss Than
Potential Im pacts Significant With Stgnlfic.- nl
Impact Mitigation Impact No Impact
lncorpo< ated
b) Resutt in substantial sod erosion or the IO&s
X
ol tOl)SOII?
TM Proposed Project would resutt In hmited removal of topsoil for construction of the expansion of the Banning WWTP and associated recycled water pipelines. Any topaoil removed from the site would be The Proposed Prqect would invotve the transport , storage, use and disposal of sodium hypochk>rite. a hazardous subs.lance that is a highly reactive and has exposure effects from inhalation. ingestion and skin contact Sodium hypochlorite would be used In the MBR treatment process and controlled under secondary containmen l structures . The expanded WWfP wou ld require the storage of a two-week placed in the immediate area and used for re-cornpacttOrl purposes . The Proposed Project would not resu lt in development of any struclures on sloped areas or w~hin any area of potential slope failure supply. or approximate ly 1,800 gallons, of sodium hypochlorile Sodium hypochlorite would be transported , stored , used and disposed of in accordance with applicable USE PA RCRA, OSHA and Therefore, slope stabdization would not be required . The potenhal for SOIi erosion and loss of topsoil Unifonn Fire Code regulations . Operation of the expanded w.sstewater treatment plant would not be would be considered m1n1mal. Impacts from erosion and loss of lopsrnl would be considered less than expected to create a significant hazard to the pubbc The impact of the Proposed Project from significant. hazardous materials would be considered less than significant. c) Be localed on a geologocel unit or sod that 1s
unstable. or that would become unstable as a
X
b) Create a aign,f,cant hazard to the pubhc or X
the environment through reasonably
resutt of the proiect. and potentially re&Uft In foreseeable upset and acodent condrtIons on• or off-srte landshde , lateral spreading, involving the release of hazardous matenals subsidence, hquefaction or collapse? into lhe environment? The Proposed Project would be designed and constructed in accordance with the recommendations of The Proposed ProteCt would require the storage and use of sodium hypochlonte , a hazardou• materia l. the s1te-spec1fic geotechmcal investigation which requires that approval by the Geotechnical Engineer Th,s material would be stored and used w,th !!. eeondary conla, nment that would collect sodium for placement and compaction of fill backfillH> g of trenches and testing of soils . Based on the hypochlorite in the event of an unforeseen upset or acctdent The impact from release of sodium geotechn1cal inveshgation , rl is not anticipated that project construction would result in on- or off-site hypochlo rite into the environment would be considered less than significant . landshde, lateral spreading subsidence , hquefact10n or collapse . Impacts from unstable sods would be considered less than s1gniftcant The rupture of a recycled water pipeline could result 1n release of water erther onto the street or m the d) Be toxated on expansive soil as defined in X
Table 18-1-8 of tlle Uniform Building Code
1994), creating substanlial risks to life or
property?
subsurface Recycled water in tlle pipeline would be treated to Hie 22 standards and would nol create a s,gmftcant hazard to the public ( Title 22 treated water is su~able for human contacl) Dev., lopme nt and operatlOll of the Proposed Project would not result In a ~igrnficant hazard to ! he public and no acctden1al explosion or release of to,uc or hazardous substances would be expected to occur. Impacts from hazardous matenals would be considered less than signdicant.

The site Is situated on Quaternary- age a"uv,um and alluvial fan deposits denved from the ero•ion of C) Emn hazardous emissions or handle earth materials in the San Bernardino mountains to the north and transportatK> n by streams and sheet now to the s(e area These alluvial deposi ts gen1>rally consist of various murtures ol sand , sik and gravel The expansion potential for soils on the site is expected to be very low based on the soil class1ficat1on ( Converse Consultants , 2007). Therefore, impacts from expansive soils would be hazardous or acutely hazardous matenals X
subltances. or waste W11hin one,.quarter mile
of an exist, ng or proposed school?
considered less than significant
e) Have sods incapable of adequately X
supporting the use ol septic tanks or
attemative wastewater disposal systems
where sewe,11 are not avatlabk! for the
disposal of waatewater?
The,- are no existing or proposed schools w~h,n one-qua rter mile of the Banning WWTP The ProPosed Project would not use or store hazardous subliitances m quantities that couki result in a sign ificant hazard to the public. Dosmfec! ion of recycled water would be accomplished at the Banni ng WWfF Dismfect1on of p,pehnes would not be conduded, all chlorine inJect,on would be accomplished at the Banning WWTP only Therefore , no accid ental explosion or release of toxic or hazardous substances as a result of the Proposed Protect woukj be expected to occur near an ex1stmg or proposed school
The Proposed Project would not include the requirement to support the use of septJC tanks or alternatNe wastewater disposal systems
d) Be located on a site which , s included Of1 a
11st of hazardous materials sates compiled X
vu . Hazards and Hazardous Materials Would tne oroiect
pursuant to Government Code Section
65~ 2 5 and as a result . would it create a
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or significant haz,ird to the public or the the environment through the routine X environment?
transport, use or disposal of hazardous
materials?
25 26
1142
l.OHThan less Than
Pounllally Sfgnfflc• nl LoM Than
Potential hnpacts Signifiunt With Signifi" nt
Impact Mitigation Im pact No Impact
rncorporatod
Potanl'- lly Sig nifica nt Laas Than
Potontlel Impacts Slgniflcanr Wlll1 StgnlflQnt
Impact Mitigation lmp1d Notmpad
lncorporataid
A sea rch of available emmonmental records was conducted In December 2006 by Track Info Services , LLC , an independent database review company . The records search includes a review of 3" ailable federal. state , and local environmental databases These databases identify properties or locations that have had known releases of regulated sub, tances, or which have had histo ries 1nvolvmg the use , storage , trealment, generation , dtspoaal. or hanid ling of hazardous substances The records search meets search requirements of ASTM Standard Practice for EnVJronmental Site Assessments, E 1527- The project site i• localed In a " moderate· to · no fuer Fire Th reat Zone ( City of Banning , 2007a). The construction and operation of the Proposed Project would not result in any increase in the fire hazard at or near the prqecl !!lite. The Propos.ed Project wou ld not result Vl any mcrease in exposure of people or structure& to nsk from wildland fires Therefore . impacts from witd land fires would be considered less than significant .
00 . No hsted faci lities. within one mile of the project site were present on the National Pnonty list VIII. Hvdroloav and Water Qualitv Would the ~~ ect .

NPL), Corrective Action Reports , Treatment Storage and O1spooal Facfflty List, or Stale Prionty List The site for the proposed WWTP expansion and recycled water pipelines would not create any s,gnoficant hazard to the public or lhe environment.
a) V10lale any water qualrty slandards Of waste
discharge requirements? X
e) For a pro,ect localed wilhm an airport land The developrrnrnt of proJect fac1'11es would increase recycled water dislribuuon withi n the C,ty of use plan or. Where such a plan hes not been Ban ning service area Groundwater from Well R 1 would be extracted and piped to the expanded adopted , wdh, n two miles of a publK: airport X WWTP for processmg. No groundwater would be released . Impacts to water quality standards or or pubiH: use airport , would the prOjecl resutt waste disch11rge requirements would not be expected m a safety hazard for people residing or
wor1ung In the proiect area? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantiaHy with groundwater
The prOjed area Is located approximately 0.4 miles south of the Banni ng Mumopal Airport The srte , s recharge 1uch that there would be a net within the Banning Municipal Airport Master Plan area and withi n the Zone E compalibil, ty area for the au-port Zone E includes add1t1onal lands under Importan1 airspace around the airport Aircraft clefteC in aquder volume or a lowering of local
X
groundwate rtable level ( e g ., the producllO( I
overfhght of these areas are typH: ally al alttludes of less than 3,000 fee t above the airport elevation In rat" of pre-elflstrng nearby wells would drop portions of the area , tall structures are height limrted The proposed expansion of the Banning WWTP lo a level which would not support existing would not require construct, on of stOJctures that would exceed approximately 30 feet in height ( height land uses oc planned uses fOf which permts hrmtattons would not be exceeded). Therefore , there would be no airport safety related impacts h'""" been 9F11nted)? f) For a pfOJ9CI within the 111C1n, ty of a private The City of Banning WWTP is underlain by the East Banning Storage Un~ which encompasses air1tnp , would the prqect result in a safety X app roximately 4.4 square miles and se= the area at the base of the Banning Bench and the sout hern hazard for people reaid1ng or working In the portion of the City In 2004 depth lo groundwater within this storage un,t was 380 feet below grou nd proiect area? surface ( lbgs) The Proposed PrOject would not result In depletion of groundwater supplies beca use The project area is not located adIacent to any pnvate airstrips Therefore. there would be no airport safety related impacts .
the volume of groundwater withdrawn at WeU R1 would be exceeded by the amount be1n9 perco lated In the series of ponds east of the WWTP In addition the production of recycled wat6r would al leviate some of the waler demand and prov, de benef1e1al uses The Crty of Banning is experiencing a g) Impair 1mplementat, on of or physically
interfere With an adopted emergency X
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
temporary surplus ot water in the Beaumont Baim , and is allowed lo pump sufficient water from this basin m order to meet its water demand ( City of Banning , 2005). The earthworl< associated with construction of the proposed WNTP expansion end recycled water pipelines would not interfere with any known aquifers . Therefore, impacts to groundwater supplies would be considered less than s1gndrcant.

The Proposed PrQJect would not = ult In any interference with existihg emergency response or emergency evacuation plans fo r local state or federal agencies Whi le temporary lane closures may occur complete street closures would not be required during project construction All emergency procedures would be implemented within local , state. and federal guidelines Therefore , , mpacts to emergency response or evacuation plans would be considered less than significant c) Subslanlllllty alter the existing drainage
pattem of the srte or area 1ncludng through X
the atterahon of !Ni course of a stream or
nver in a mannl! r that would result m
substanUal erosaon or siltatton on- or off-&rte?
h) Expose people or olructur"• to a s,gmficant
nsk of losa, injury or death , n\/Olving w11dl11nd X
fires, including where wlldlands are adJacent
to urbanrzed areas or where residences are
nterm, xed with wildlands?
Construction of the proposed recycled water pipeline would not require any alteration of drainage patterns or waterways . Eros10n control measures would be implemented during construction to mIn, mIze the potential for sediment to be picked up and transponed ofl-srte, or by runoff. Conslruct1on equipment would not be rtnsed off on- s,te in such a manner to affect nearby dra inageways .

Construction matenals would be covered and stored , n contained areas llWllY from Smith Creek .

Therefore , impacts to drainage patterns from the Proposed Project would be considered less than significant
27 28
1143
Less Tha n
Potontial ly Slgr11fitant LNs Than
Potant .. l lmpacta Sig nificant Wllh Sig niflean1
Impa ct ll lt]gallon lmJloill Cl No Im pact
Incorporated
d) Subatanhal1y alte, the ex,sung drainage
pattern of the srte or area . including tile
alterat, on of the course of a stream or riVer X
or aubstan1tlllly IOCT8a$ e the rate or amount
of aurface runoff in a manner that would
result 1n flooding on- or off- site?
The Proposed Proiect would not resu~ in any alteration of the existing drainages Pipelines would be placed 1n ex1sung roadways or wtlh 1n public nght-ol-ways along Charles Street. Hathaway Stree t Lincoln Stroet , and Sunset Avenue At the extenston of Westward Avenue , the proposed recycled water lme would be suspended on an e, ostIng pipe bridge a1rn1lar to existing utilities ( the pipeline would not be constructed in the washes assoc iated with Pers hing or Smllh Creeks). This , s the only locatio n where the pipe line would be suspended . Design of pipelines at these cross ings would 1nducle restraint JOl nls to prevent io1nt separatoon and poss ible leakage The proposed pipelines wou ld be placed underground and would not result , n increased impervious surfaces The resulbng surface runoff wou ld not be expected to change from existing cond1oo ns or result in any increase 1n flood ing The Federal Emergency Management Agency ( FEMA) has identified areas subject to 100-year flood hazards along the northern reache$ of Sm ith Creek and the channels of Pershing Creek { Impact Sciences. Inc , 2006) Floodplains associated wfih Smith Creek are present south of the Banning WWTP and encompass a portion of ! he southern ponds al the facilrty. The proposed expansion of the Banning WWTP would not be located in any area designated as a floodplain . The proposed recycled waler line along Lincoln Street would cross over several forme r unnamed ) washes Iha! had originated on the Banning bench .

Eras ion control measu res would be 1mplemenled dunng construct10n of project facilities to mmmuze the potential for ua1menl to be plCl(ed up and trans ported off-site by runoff Standard erosion conlrol measures would include slockp 1kng and covering topsoil, as we ll as best management pracbces to prevent water qua hty impacts These mea&ures would be accomplished by the conslruct10n contractor and momtored by the City of Banning Construction equip ment would not be rinsed off on-site. or in such a manner as to adverse ly impact Smith Creek alo ng lhe southem boundary of the prOJ8CI site.

Construction materials would be cove red and stored in contained a reas away from any drainage areas Standa rd erosoon control measures would effectniely prevent and minimize adverse impacts from runoff lmnads to dramane would be conside red less lha n SiQnif,cant. e) Create. or contribute runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of exis11ng or planned X
s! OffllWaler dramage systema or provide
substantial ada1tional sources of polluted
runoff?
The Proposed Projed would contri bute to storm runoff due lo an increase in ImpervIous surface area While approxnnately 9 5 acres of land would be d,slu rbed only approximately one acre of land wou ld become Imperv1ous This equales to an increase , n impervious la1ld of approximately less tha n one percent of the tota l 126 acres of land on which the Banning wwrP is localed Expansio n faci lities would be designed with adequa te Site drainage The capacity of the e xis ti ng stonnwater drainage system , s e,qJt, c:ted to accommodate any incri,a&e from impervious areas Stgnificanl adver$e operal10nal UTipacts lo surface water qualrty are not expected lo occur Impacts lo stonnwater ara1nage systems would be considered le•s than Significant
I) O! helWlae substantially degrade water
quality? X
29 Leu Tha n
Pc t..nlial ly Significant Les , Than
Pote,nt~ I Impacts Slanl fl<lnl Wltn Signtflca n1
tmpact MiUgat lo n Impact No Impact
lncorpom: ed
The Proposed Proj ect would not resull in any other effects that could sub stantially degrade wate r qualrty The Proposed Project woul d meet all appl,cat>le Title 22 req uireme nts , and would not v10 lal.a any water qua lity standards o r waste discharge requ ir ements Any di$charges wou ld be cond ucted in accordance with lhe City' s Waste Di scharge Requireme nts ( Orde r No 01-022 ) which woul d be amen ded for processing of recycled water. The City plans to deve lop and , mpleme nt a compr ehensive water quality momtormg prog ra m to as. s.ess the ave rage concentration of total di ssol\ led soli ds , nitrates and chlo riaes in ! he Ba nning and Cabazon groundwater bas,ns to ensure that perco lation ponds are not signific antly degr ading groundwater qual~y No sign ifica nt impacts to wa ter qualrty are expected to occur as a result of th e P roposed P roject .
g) Place housmg with in a 100-year flood hazard
area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard X
Boundary o, Flood Insurance Rate Map or
other flood hazar< I delineation map?
The Proposed Pro1ec t would not res u~ m the placement of housmg in the 100-year flood hazard area h) Place wrth1n a 100- year flood hazard area X
suuctures that would impede or red11ect flood
flows?
Both 100- year and 500- year floodplains have been mapped on ! he site and in the project a<ea.

Althou gh lhe wash 1s no longe r visible due to develo pment. the historic 100-yea r lloodpla1n west of the Ban ning WMfP originates from an unnamed creek otiginating on the Ban mng Bench at elevallon 3,000 ft above sea level ( this unnamed creek 15 not a tributary of the San Gorgon, o River). The 100- year flood plain a•socialed wrt h Smith Creek south of the Banning WWTP e><lends over a portion of the aeration ponds at the pla nt
The Proposed PfOlecl would be located upon fou r flood zones desig nated by FEMA 1as lollaNs · the WWTP expansion site . Well R1 and the pipeline from We ll R1 to the WWTP wou ld be located on Zone C; the recyded water pipeline wo uld be located pnma nly on Zon es B and C, one segment ol the p1pe hne along Linco ln Street at 4" Street would be with in Zone A. and, one segment ot the pipeli ne along West Lincoln Streel east of Adams Avenue would be localed , n Zone A4 A poroon of the proposed recyc led wa ler p1pel1ne along Hathaway and Li nco ln Stree ts, as well as along the unnam!Od City access road . would be located Within the historic 100-yea r floodplain anoc, ated with Smit h and Pershing Creeks Highland Wash and two unnamed creeks orig,nat ing in the mountains north of Bann ing The pipeline would be bu ried unde rgrou nd at a depth of approx, malely 5 fee t and wou ld not be directly exposed to ffood hazards. The Proposed Proiect w,:,uld not unpede or redirect flow w1lhm any creeks or drainage areas There fore , nnpacts to the 100- year flood haza r<I area wou ld be considered less than SJOndicanl
FO,IA ha5 JdeMfied and mapped areas that are at nsk due IO penodlc noochng Flood lnsuranoe Raltng Maps { FIRM) lldUde$ flood ZOO& dMigNtiom lor ; area. t ubfect lo rlood..ng bared on engfleiel1flg and hydro. logic: 1tudle$ The foltow. ng flood zone dnqwtlonl • r. fDlm on ttw FIRM mapt prodv(IO(I for Ille lllet, of thu Ptop06Gd Projccl Zones A arm A4 Areas .. wn a 1 ~r.ent ~ al r.tlaf"(, t or flo oding over the ~fe o( a JO- year rnorlgage , and conuiefed to be a high n,k. art!a (1ood n1.urancl!!! rs ~ aiofy)
Zone, 8 8ncl C . Arees outside ltie 1 percent DllllUal diancc loodptan and constdcred 10 be! a moaerilCe 10 kJw nsle life.I (flooO m uraoce • no l mandatory}.
30 1144
l.e&s Thiiln Lest Than
Potantially Significant LA61 Than
Potontilll lm~ i. Slgnlfh; anl With Significant
lmpac1 Mit4). ation Impact No Impact
Potant~ lty Slgnificant LenT' hJn
Polenllal Impacts S5gnHteant Wltn Signfficant
Imp.act MIUgaUon Impact Nolmpacl
Incorporated Incorporated
1) Expoge people or structures to a siS)niflC8flt
nsk of loss ir,.ury or death 1nvol11mg flooding , X
1ncludmg flooding as a resutt of the !;a1lure of
a levee or dam?
Wild and Scenic Rivers . There are no designated Wild and Scenic Rivers that would be impacted by the proposed pr01ect The closest river w,th th11 designation is Sespe Creek in Ventura County , which is approxomately 120 mile• from the City of Banning .

The Proposed Project would not expose people or property to flood-related hazards The net drainage from the area would not be changed with the implementation of the Propos ed Project Therefore , no s1gmficant impacts would be expected to occur
Conflicts with land use designations and zoning ordinance would r,ot be expected Impacts to local land use and zoning would be con•idered less than significant C) Conflict With any applicable habitat X
conservabon plan or natural commumty
j ) lnundahon by aetehe tsunami or mudflow? X conservalK> n plan? Flooding assoclaled with seiches ( wave- like oscdtations of water in an enclosed basin caused by earthquakes, high wmds or other atmosphenc cond~ ion•) •• not anticipated al the pr01ecl site due to rts distance lrorn enclosed bodl8S of water The Protect site is localed approximately 50 miles northeast of the coast The potential for ,nundatlon by a tsunami is e,pected to be a rare occurrence There are no conservatio n plans or natural commun,ty conservation plans that overlay the Proposed Project The proposed expansion of the Banning WWTP and Phase I recycled water dlstnbut, on tine would be localed in the developed ulban portion of the City of Banning ConseNation areas of Western R111eniide Counly are located south of the prOjeci area The proposed prOJeci 1s r,ot located within the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat ConseNBlion Plan ( MSHCP) area Therefore, The Proposed Project would not result in any increased nsk for inundation by mudflow lmpacis from there the Proposed PfOjeCt would not co nflict wrth the MSHCP or any other eXJsting conservation plan . selChe, tsunami or mudflow would not be e,pecied
X. Mineral Resourc es . Wou ld the prOject
IX . Lan d Use and Planning . Woold the pro1ect
a) Result 1n the loss of ava1labilrty of a known X
a) Phy&ically divide an eatabhshed community? X mmeral JflOUrt: e that would be of value to the reg,on and the residents of the state?
The Proposed Project would consist of construciion of p1pel1nes Within ex1sling Of planned roadways .

Nearby residential properties wculd not be adversely impacted by proposed fac,hlies or operat10ns The Proposed Proiect would be located on land owned by the City or land that the City has utikty easements Consrruction of the pro1ect faCJlities would not resutt in any drvision of the community.

The proJect area ,. located 1n Mineral Resource Zone 3, an area where a11a1lable geologic information indicates that mineral deposits are likely to exisl however, the significarice of the deposit cannot be evaluated from available data. No IOS5 of ava.ifability of known mineral resources would result from 1mplementahon of the Proposed Protect The impact of conslrucl10n of the proposed project facdit,es al b) Con flict wrt h any applicable land use plan , this location on mineral resources t5 considered to be less lhan signtf,cant. pohcy or regulat, on of an agency W1th
junsdicl, on over the proJect ( including. but not X
lmvted to the general plan . specific plan. toca l
coastal program. or roning ordinance)
adopted fo, the purpooe of avooding or
b) Result m the loss of avallab il•y cf a locally
important mineral resource recovery site X
delineated on a tocal general plan. speaf, c
plan or other land u &e plan ?
mihgilllflg an envirorvnental elfect?
The Banning Quarry . operated by Robertson' s Ready Mix, ,. the only aggregate producer "' the City of The Cfy of Banning designate5 land use for Banning WWTP as Public Fac~~ies and Industrial The Banning The Banning Quarry 1s mined for rock sand and base materials used fO< concrete and proposed recycled water p1pel1ne would be placed pnmanly m exist, ng or planned streets and the city construc: lion . Th,s quarry 15 located north of 1-10 in an MRZ-2 area . The Proposed PfOjeci would not of 8an111ng rights- of-way . The p,pehne corndor would cross over the following General Plan be located on ; my locally important mineral resource recovery site , nor would ~ result in any designa110ns Industrial, Airport Industrial, Public Facifilies , General Commercial Business Pan<. YeJy interference with existing mining operations al the Banning Quarry lllerefore, impacts to mineral Low Density Residential. Low Density Re51dential Medium Dens~ y Residential , Open Space Part<, and resources would be considered less than &, grnficant.

Open Space Resources ( Clly of Banning 2007a) Zoning des,gnations 1n the Crty of Banning are consistent with the General Plan XI . Noise. Wo uld Ille proj8CI result , n Coastal Zone Management Act. The coastal zone for the State of California 1s defined as the land and water an,a of the state from the Oregon border to Iha border of the Republic of Mexico. extending seaward to the state' s outer limit of JUnsdiction, 1nclud1ng all offshore islands , and e,tendmg inland generally 1000 yards from the mean high tide ~ ne of the sea . In significant coastal estuanne , habrtat. and recreational areas 11 extends inland to the first ma)Or ndgeline paralleling the sea or five miles from the mean high tide hne of the sea, whichever 1s less, and 111 developed ulban areas the zone generally a) Expo• ure of pe<110fl$ lo, or 11enerahon of
noise levels in excess of standards X
established 1n the local general plan or notso
o rd,nance , or applicable 5tandards cl other
agencies?
extends inland less than 1,000 yards There have been some mmor moddicabons to the boundary since the program was approved R,verside County '" not w1th1n the Coastal Zone The proposed protect is not located w1th1n the Coastal Zone
31 32
1145
Lon Than
Potent~ lly Signific. ant l ••• Than
Pot. nUaJ Impact& S~ ntfkanl With Significant
Impact Mitigation lml)OCI No Impact
Incorporated
Loss Than
Potentl• tly Slgnlftcant Lese Than
Potential Jmp.ai;.ts s50nmcant With Slgniflc. ant
Impact Mltl; atlon Impact No Impact
lnCOrp<> f" Aled
The prunary noi$e source In the City of Banning is motor vehicle traffic. In addition, the Banning Municipal Airport generates InlermIttenl n01se from daily takeoff• and landings d) A substantial temporary or penod, c increase
m ambient noise levels in the project vicinity X
above levels e•1StIng wrthout lhe pf' Oject?
N01se 11T1pacts from prOfect actrvIties are a function of the noise generated by conslNcllOll equlJ)ment. the location and sensitivity of nearby land uses. and the duration of the nois" ijenerating activities . The The Proposed Pro_iect would result m a temporary increase m ambient noise levels during construction construction of proposed pipelines would include pavement breaking and excavation. ConstruCtKlt"I activities The impact of the temporary increase in noise would be considered less than significant. equipment that could be used dunng expansion or the \/ INI/TP include& graders , bulidozer5 , dvrnp trucks and front end toaders . Construd10n equipment that could be used during pipehne 1nstallabon includes jackhammers , pavemenl breake~ and trenching machine:, During constructK)fl , single-family residences In the 1mmed1ale area would be sub1ected to temporary increases m n01se levels Operahon of construchon equIpmen1 may generate 1nterm11ten1 noise levels up to 80 dBA al approximately 150 feet from the source
e) For a proiect located wdhttl an airport land
use plan or, where such • plan has not been
adopted within two miles of a publlC airport X
or public use airport. would the pr(lJect
expo• e people regKJing or w0f11Jng in the
project area to excesaive noise lewis?
An average day- night sound level of 65 dBA Is genera lly accepted as a standard for residential communities R1vers1de County does not have a specific ordina nce add ressing nrnse hmIts for consl/ uction. The County restricts com!itructlon n01se limits on a nuisance basis The Building and Safety Depa rtment of R1ver5ide County limlts construction hours to between the hours ol 7 AM to 6 PM The Cily ol Banning has adopted no1Se control and abatement ordi nances ( Nos. 1138 and 1243) In The Proposed Project is localed within the Banning Mun1c1pa, I Airpo rt Masle r Plan area . but would not e•pose people who reside or work in the area to excesaive noise levels The expected noise level from the Proposed Proiect would not differ substa ntlally from the eK1Sling noise environment at the Banning WWTP. Impacts to noise would be considered less than significant accordance with Sect10n 46026 of the Health and Safely Code ( Model Community Nrnse Ord1nanao) f) For • PfOled Within the v1cmity ol a pr,vate
VVhile temporary increases in noise m the surrounding area may result m annoyance to local residents. adverse effecls such as speech mterference. sleep distu rbance , and hearing loss would not be expected to resull Construction activrties for the proposed prOfect would not be expected to exceed airstrip, would the prorect expose people X
r1!sid,ng or wortmg in the project area to
axcesa1va noise level•?
the average day-night sound level or 65 dBA . Constructio n act1vrt 1es would be hmIted to daytime hours. The Proposed Prorect is not located in the vicinity of any pnvate airstri ps No post constr uct1011 noise- generating activities would resu lt from the Proposed Pro1ect. The pnnc1pal source of noise during operar10ns wQuld be from limited veh1CUlar noi$e ff'Qfll maintenance personnel XII . Population and Housing Wou ld the prOJ8CI
working at the srte The Proposed PrOJect would not '11s ult in any change to the number of personnel .

Therefore, impacts to n0tse from operations would be considered less than significant. a) Induce substantial population growth 1n an
area, e.iher directly ( for example, by X
b) Exposure of persons to or generat., n of
excessive groundbome Ylbration or X
groundbome noise levels?
proposing new homes and businesses) or
1nd,rectly ( for example, through extension of
roaos or other infrastructure)?
Construction actNrties may resu~ in vibration from compacting and grading equipment . incl uding pavement breakers , Jack hammers. and a trench machine Groundborne vibration 1s measured using lhe typical annoyance threshold of 72 VdBA ( v,brabo nal A-weighted decibe l level) Excessive amounts of groundbome v1brehon or noise levels wo uld not be expected from construC1io n equipment to be The Proposed Pro1ec1 would not have direct growth 1nd.ucmg effects, although rt would support the ongoing and plan ned development in the Banning wastewater treatment seivIce are a. The Propo$ ed Project would not result In the need for addrtlOllal infras truct ure Impacts to population growt h would be considered less than significant
used For these reasons impacts from groundborne v1bra t1on would be consKlered less than significant
b) D15ptace substantial numbers of ex,sbng X
housing , necessitating the construction ol
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient
replacement hous, ng elsewhere?
no,se levels in lhe project Y1C1n1ty above X
levels eJOSt1ng Without the proteet?
The Proposed Pr<>ted would not displace any housing . All PIOPOSed project fac, hhes would be constructed within existing streets and right-ol-ways. Therefore , the pro,ect would not result In any No post construct10n noise-generating act,vIbe• would resu lt from the Proposed PrOJect. The Proposed impaas to housing
Projeci would result In short-term increases m noise levels during consttuclion. but would not result in any permanent change to the eXJshng ambient n01se level once constru ction of 1he '! N'NrP expansion and pipelines are complete Impacts to ambient noise levels in the project vicinity would be considered less than significant.
c) Displace aub&tanhal numbe< 1' of people, X
necess~ating the construction of replacemant
houSlng elsewhere?
The Proposed PrOfecl would not displace any people , or result in the need for replaceme nt housmg elsewhe1e Therefore, the Proposed Proiect would not result m any impacts to housmg 33 34
1146
L~ sToan leHTh, n
Pot. nUalty Slgnlnc. ant Loss Thall
Po19nllal Impacts Signific. ant With Slgnlflcant
Impact Mitiga- tion Impact No Impact
lnco, pontod
PolenliaUy Significant Les. s Than
Poto- nt" 81 Impacts S~nlficant With Sfgnlfleant
lmpacl Mltlglllon lmpa<t No Impact
Incorporated
XIII. Public Services. Would the p,qect result on substantial adverse physical impacts assoc, ated w,th tile provIs10t1 of new or ptlysicalty altered governmental facd11tes need for new "' physocally b) Does lhe project include recreat, onal f11c,lities
X "' require the construct, on or expan510tl of
aitered governmental fac1ht.ies. t~e construclton al whw;h could cause signtf,cant env,n:>nmental 1mpads 1n order to maintain acceptable 1orvta! ratios response times or other performance recrealtonal facilibe• that m,ght have an
adverse physical effect on the environment?
obtect1'1e-s for any of the public serv,ces
The Proposed Project would not mclude any recrealKJnal facilities No impacts to the environment from a) Fire protect10n? X expansion of recreationa lfacilll1es would be expected to occur'.

The Roverstde County Fore Department. in cooperation w,th the California Department at Forestry and Fire Protection . provktes fire protectKJn services to the proJect area . Th1t Proposed ProJed woukJ not XV. Transportation/Traffic. Wouki tho project
result 1n any increase in lhe demand for fire protection services The Proposed Project would not a) Cause an increase , n trafftc that , s substantial generate a need for new fire statK>Os m the area or cause any signrficanl impacts to existing finJ in relation to the ex,sting traffic load and X protection services Therefore. impacts to fire protection services are not expected . capacrty of th11 • t- system (1 e . result m a substantial increase In either the number of
b) Police protect-, n? X vehicle trips. the volume LO capacity ratio on The Banning PoHce Department and the R,vers,de County Sherd!' s Department provide police roads, or conge.sbon at 1ntersechons)?
protection in the pro,ect area . The Proposed Project would allow adequate circulation for pede, tnans, veh,cJes, and pohce patrols. II ,s not ant1C1paled that the Proposed PrOj<'ci would resutt , n the need for new pol,c.e stations tn the area. or otherwise impact existing pohce servtceS Dunng the construction perk>d , construction workers woukf access the vmTP expansion site on a dady basis . Assuming thal all the workers travel 1n single occvpant vehicles , this would result m additional inbound and out.bound vehicle tnp& These trips would occur bef0<e morning and evening peak hour c) Schools? X
traffic Movement of the construction vehicles would not be expected to resutt in any change 10 the volume-to-capacity rattO of roadways or congestion at intersectKlns in the kxal area . ConstructionThe Proposed ProJect woold not generate any add11tonal populatKJn in the area, and therefore would not Impact local school enrollments The Proposed Project would not othe1W1se aaversely impact related traffic would be a temporary , short-term condItKJn and Is nol expected to result in any substantial effects on traffic
ex1!.L1ng and planned schools tn the area . Therefore no adverse impacts to schools would result from the Proposed Proj ect .

Operation of the Proposed Project is estimated to resull in no net change in the number of pen.onnel vehicles. F0< these reasons , mpacts to ttaffic would be considered less than s,gmficant d) Parks? X
b) Exceed. either individually or cumulatrvely , a
The proposed project faolities would not result m any impacts to loca l parks There would be no change to the planned 150-acre Smrth C ,eek Park tha t would be developed south of the Banning WWTP The Proposed Proj ect would not result m adve rse impacts to existing or planned parks , n the level of service standard established by the X
county conge&tKJn man"llement Sll"ncy for
des19naled roads or h1glJWays?
reg ion
Vehicular traffic would be expected to increase temporarily during the construction period as a result of e) Other publtc fac1llties? X
the daily proJect- related vehicle trips Traffic may be temporarily delayed dunng the installation of recycled water pipelines atong ex,stmg streets { Charles Street , Hathaway Street, Lmcoln Street and Tlle proposed prOJect facdrt,es would be operated and maintained by the City of Banning or , ts designated operator. and would not result in any impacts to other public fac 1litIes.

Sunset Avenue) Temporary lane closures may be requ ired, however closure or complete roads Is not expected These temporary and localtzed impact s would nol be expecled to result in a subslan tiat change to the current level of service for affected roadways For these reasons . construc lion impacts XIV. Recreation to traffic would be considered less than aignificant Dunng operat, ons the Proposed Project would not be expected to result , n any change to the eJOsting level of serviGe on any roa ds or highways on the a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regtonal parks or other X
Pn>Ject area Impacts lo traffic levels of service on roads and highways would be considered less than s,gmficant
recreabonal facihtfi isuch lhat substantral
physical detenoration of the faci~ty would
occur or be accelerated?
c) Ro.ults in a change in air tralf,c patterns ,
Includ, ng either an increase in traffic levels or )(
a change In locat, on that resufts on
The Proposed Pro,ect would not result in any increase m use of any parks or other recreational substantial safety nsks? facil ~1es Therefore . impacts to ex,.hng or planned neighborhood and regional parks would be less than significant. The Proposed Project would not resu ll ,n any changes to air traffic patterns that could res ul! on any ncreases in safety risks .
35 36
1147
Lon. Than Lns Ttwi
Potentially Significant LNs TIMln P01DntJ1lf) t Slgntncanr Loss Than PolanUal Impacts Significiilnt With Significant
Impact Miligatk> n Impact Ho Impact
PotentY. I Impacts Stgnlflaant With S ~ nlfi c nt
Impact Mitigation Impact No Impact
Incorporated lncorporat. i
d) Substanl1•lfy increase hazards due to a c) Requ,re o, reoutt In the construction of new design feature ( e g sharp curves o, X storm water drainage facilities, or expanStOn X dangerous intersectoons) or 1ncompalrble of ex11tong faalitoes. the con,tructoon of which uses ( e g farm equrpment)? could cause s,gnrficant envrronmental effects?
No alterations to area roadways are proposed . No substantial increase in hazards or mcompat1bte u,es would be anllc1pated as a result of the Proposed Project . The Proposed PrOJeci would provide recycled water product10n and dIstnbul10n fac 11i11es for residents in Result in tnadequate emergency access? X
the Coty of Banning . This would enable irngaloon of parks golf courses and other buffer areas with recycled waler, which would replace the use of potable water. No increase in water use would be No changes in access 10 emergency facilrtres or nearby land uses are expected lo occur as a result of expected . The Proposed Pro1ec1 would have no effect on storm water dramage tfl the area 1mplementat10n of the prOjeci d) Have suffoc, en\ wale, 1upplles available to f) Resul In inadequate parlcong cepac, ty? X
serve the prOJecl from eX1Sling entrtlemenls X
and r~rce.a, or are new or e,cpanded
The proposed \N'NTP expansion would not require additional employees or maintenance vehicles The entitlements needed?
additional proposed proiect tacIlilies would be mainlaroed by City personnel who currently part< within the existing VVVVTP boundaries The impact of the Proposed Pro,ect on parking Is considered to be less than srgnifrcant
Wale< used et the Banning WI/VTP is supplied by the City of Bannrng Water/ Wastewater Uli lrties Department The Proposed Project would use addilK>nal water for the MBR treatment process . This waler would be extracted from Well Rl localed on City property . The City has entatement lo lh1S water g) Conflict wrth adopted polrcres , plans , or
programs supporting altemalIve X
tr.msportatron ( e .g , bus turnouts, brcycte
supply in accordance with , ts 2004 adjudication Judgment for groundwate r pumping and storage nghts on the Bea umon t BaSJn ( City of Bannr ng , 2005) Therefore , impacts lo water supply would be considered less than significant
racks)? e) Result In ~ determination by the wastewater
No modIficahons to the area roadways or bikeways are proposed There would be no effects on existing facIhties and structures ( 1 e , bus turnouts and bicycle racks) that support alternative transportation Therefore , the Proposed Pf'Ofect would not result in any conflicts with policies that support alternative transportation .
treatment provider, which serves o, may X
serve the project that ii has adequate
capacdy lo se,ve the proiect' s prOJecled
demand in addItoon to 11,e provider' s exJStIng
commitments?
XVI . Utilities and Service Sy•tems. Would the prOjecl The Proposed ProJecl would not res ult In any increase In wastewater generation or otherwise a) Exceed wastewater treatment requrrements X
of the applicable Regronal Watar Qualtty
Control Board?
adversely impact lhe existing regional sewer system and local wastewater treatment plant Operat10n of the Proposed Project would result In no net change rn the number of employees or residents In the project area The proiect would not resun rn a need for addI110nal wastewater treatment capacity in the project area The addi110nal treatment capacity 1s being added In order lo accommodate planned The Proposed Project would not result m any discharges of wastewater that exceed treal.ment req uirements regulated by the California Regional Waler Qua lity Control Board ( CRWOCB ) Any discharges would be conducted in accordance with the City 's Waste Discharge Requirements ( Order No . 01-022) which would be amended for proce• srng of recycled wate r Therefore , there would be no impacts
growth 1n the community and lo provide lhe capability to produce recycled w9ter No impacts 10 wastewater treatmen t syslsms are e<pected
f) Be served by a landf1" w,111 sufficient
pemnlted capacity lo accommodate the X
pro,ect's solld waste d1spo•• I need•?
bl Require or result in the construction of new
water or wastewater treatment fac1lihe1 or X
Coo&tructoon act1vitres would generate solid waste . however the amount generated would be minim al and is not expected lo significantly impact landW capootIes. Sohd waste from the project would be expansron of exosllng facilities ! he
construct10n ol which could cause signifrcanl
environmental effects?
disposed of in landfills that have , uffrc, enl permitted capacrty ( Lamb Canyon San itary Landfill , El Sobranle Landfill and the Badland• LandfJI) Operat10n of the Proposed Project would not generate sol<i w;,sle Impacts to solid waste disposal would be considered to be less than significant The Proposed PrOject would result In construcl10n and operation of new recycled water distribut10n facihlies intended to meet the growirrg demand for water In the erea . Expansoon of the existing g) Co,nply wrth fede ral , slala, and local statutes X
and regulaloons re lated lo solid waste?
Bannrng WWTP would result m order 10 meet the demand of planned growth and provide a new capab1lIty for recycled waler production. lmpacls to water or wastewater treatment facolrties from the Propose<! Project would nor be exn.>cled
An solid waste disposal would be managed in accord ance with applrcable federal. state and local statutes and regulations Impacts to sohd waste would be considered less than signifrcanl. 37 38
1148
Loss Than
Potontkllly Stgnfficant Ln•Than
Potentill lMJ>Kla Significant With Significant
Impact Mh: lgallon Impact No Impact
Incorporated
XVII . Mandatory Findings of Significance
a) Does the P"'Jecl have the potenhal to
degrade the quahty of the enwonment .
1ubstanllafty reduce the habitat of a fish or
wIld~ fe species cause a fish or w1ldhfe
X
population to drop below self- susta, mng
levels threaten to ehmonate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restnct the
range or a rare or endangered plant or
animal . or ehminate mportant exampM! s of
the maior penoda of Calofomla htSlory or
preh,story?
The analy& IO conducted on 1h15 lntial Sludy results in a determination that the proIect could resutt on a less than s,gnihcant effect on the local environment The constructJon activities assooated with the Proposed Pro, ect would not be expected lo substantially degrade fiih wildlife, and/ or plant populations. lntruslOfl on any previously undiscovered cultural or historic resources would not be anhcopated mrtigallon for inadvertent dI1COwry of cultural materials has been included , n this analy11s). b) Doe. the pfOJ« I have impact• that are
lndMdually lmited but cumulatively
cons- le? r cumulaliYely considerable"
means that the: N1Crementa! affects of a
X
pr01ecl are conatden, ble when v1eW9d in
connection with the effects of past ProfeclS,
the effecb of other current prqects. and the
effeci5 or probable future prOjeCI• )
The Proposed Project would resu lt in loss of up to approximately 9.5 acres or marginal habitat a, a result of constructton of the expansion of the Banning ' NNTP Because the habitat that would be lost , s marginal In value . , mpacis lrom the Proposed Projecl would not be cumulatively considerable The analy,,. m thos ln,toal Study has determined that the project impacts would be considered less than 119n1fi~ nt
c) Does the pl'OJecl have enwonmental effects
that will cause substanl. lal adverse effects on X
human bel\Q$ either d.-ectly or indirectly?
Direct and mdrrecl adverse effects on human beings would not be expected as a result or the prOfed The Proposed PrDJect would resutt 1n a new capablhty to produce and doslnb\ lte Trtle 22 recycled water to the BaM1ng community, whoch , s considered a beneficial impact NOTE: Aulhof; ty coted Secbon 21083, Publ• c RuOUtCes Code. Refe< ence Sect, on 21001 and 2 1068 Public Res0< rces Code
39 3.1
SECTION 3. SUPPORTING INFORMATION
References CDOC , 2006 Farmland Mapping and Monllorw, g Program . A Guide to the Farmland Mapping and Mon~ orong Program California Departme nt or Con...- vatoon ( CDOC)
http i /www .consrv. ca .gov/ OLRP/ hnmp/ overv, ewtsurvey_ area_ map him Downloaded on AprQ 20, 2006
City of Bann, ng 2007a City of Batm/flf1 General Plan Downloaded from the Crty of Banning website http:// www. g bann1ng ca us on January 30 . 2007
C,ly of Banmng, 2007b . City of Banning Pub/,c UlflillOS Department.

Water D1v1SIOfl 2005 Annual Wore, Qua/tty Reporl.

Downloaded from the City ol Banning web& rte
htlp ./lwww g banmna ca us on January 30 2007
Crty ol Banning , 2007c lnformatoon of major res, denr, al and commeroal proJects Economic Development ( department)
Downloaded from the City al Banning website
http'//W,Nw Cl banninQ ca .us on January 30 2007
Coty of Banmng 2005 0/y of Banning 2005 Url>an Waler
Managemenl Plan Prepared by Wildermuth Env, ronmenlal
fnc . for the Crty of Bannmg December
Coty of Banning , 1998 Notice of Determ1natwm . Banning Wa, tewater Treatment Facility Upgrade . State Clearinghouse Number 98061~ 7 Joly 29 .

Converoe Consultants . 2007 . Geotechmcal lnvest, gation Report_ 1.5 MGD Expans, on of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plan!
Crty of Banmng , California Converse Protect No. 06-81-218- 01 February 6, 2007 .

CRM Tech , 2007 ldent1hcat10n and Evaluatoon of H,storoc Properties.

Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansoon and
Recycled Wa ter System . Crty of Banning , Californie. CRM Tech Cont raci No 2083 July 20 , 2007
Impact Sciences , Inc , 2006 Draft Environmental Impact Report ( EIR) Five Bndges Spec, fic Plan . November
Rovers, de County 2006 Riverside County Land lnforrnat, on System RIVMSide County webs~ e www .tlma co nv= ide ca us
Track Info Serv, ces , 2006 Environmental Firsrsearch Report Target Property- Bann, ng CA 92220 Job Number 260269 .

Prepared by Traclt> lnfo Serv, ces LLC for Parsons 12- 12--06.

UC River5lde, 2006 Understanding lhe Plants Md Animals of lhe Wes/em R,verside County M11/i;pie Species Hebitat
Conservatoon Plan Information downloaded on Apnl 20 . 2006 from the Department of Earth Sciences, Universrty of
Caltfornoa, Riverside .
http "//ecoregoon. ucr edulfull. asp? sp num c79
40 1149

3.2 List of Preparers Madhu Kundu, Civil Engineer, Engineering Manager Temesgen Garoma, Ph.D .. P.E., Civil Engineer
Rosemarie Crisologo, CEOA Task Manager
John Moeur. Ecologist and Pnncipal Scientist
Angela Schnapp, Environmental Engineer
Brynna McNulty, Associate Scientist
Kip Harper, Cultural Resource Specialist
41 APPENDIX A
Clean Air Act General Conformity Applicability Analysis 1150
DRAFT

CLEAN AIR ACT

GENERAL CONFORMITY APPLICABILITY ANALYSIS

FOR THE PROPOSED WASTEWATER TREATMENT

PLANT EXPANSION AND

PHASE I RECYCLED WATER SYSTEM

BANNING , CALIFORNIA

CITY OF BANNING
WaterlWastewat er Utilities Department
176 E. Lincoln Street
Banning , C alifornia 92220
May 2007
Gonarof Coofcxmity Applicabil, ty / loa/ ys, s
Proposed Wastewater Treatment Plant Expans, on and
Ph•"'-' Recy,; led Water SysJem in Banning Cahfom, a

TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................... .

Table o( Contents
LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................ Ii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ·-······ .......... .

SECTION 1 CLEAN AIR ACT CONFORMITY ....................................................................................... 1-1

1. 1 Introduction ... . 1-1
1 2 Confonnity Background lnfonnatlon . 1-1
1 3 General Conforrrnty Determmal, on Process ..

1.3 .1 App licability .

1.3.2 Analysis 1-3
1 3 3 Procedure . . . 1-3
SECTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION ................................................................. 2-1 2 .1 Location of the Proposed Action . . ........ 2-1

2.2 Purpose of the Proposed Action 2-1
2 3 Elements of the Proposed Action .. . . ..... ....... . 2-1 2 3 1 Pn:,jeel Construction .. ..... ..... ......... . ......... 2.1 SECTION 3 EXISTING AIR QUALITY ·····································-···························································· 3·1 3 1 Meteorlogical Condr!Jons .
3 2 Cntena Pollutants and Standards
321

3.2 .2

3.2.3 Nitr,
3 2.4 Sulfu

3.2.5 Susp

3.2.6 Lead

3.3 Air Quality Control Region ..
3 3 1 Attamment Status
SECTION 4 ANALYSIS AND RESU LTS
41 Confonnity Determination Methodology ...
4 1 1 Analy! Jcal Methods
4 1 2 Pollutants of Concern .
4 1 3 Appl icability

4.2 Changes in Emissions fO( the Proposed Action ...

4.2 .1 Construction ..
4 2.2 Summary of Results .
4 3 Conformity Delerm1natK> n Re•ults .
4 .3. 1 Proposed Action ....
4 .4 Conclusion ..

SECTION 5 REFERENC ES ................... ·-··············· ................. .

Append ix A Em ission Calc ulations
4•2
4-'I
5•1
May2007
1151
General Con/ onndy Appbcab< 1'y Analys, s
Proposed Wa ste. varer 1reatment Pfanl F1tpanS10n a,xt
Phase I Recyc/ ecl Water System in Bannng, Cabto.. rna Table ofConlanls Figure 2-1
Table 1- 1
Table 2 -1
Table 2-2
Table 3-1
Table 3-2
Table 4- 1
Table 4-2

LIST OF FIGURES
Locabon Of Proposed Act10n

LIST OF TABLES
De M,rwm,s Levels for Cnte na Pollutants m Nonattamment Areas .

Constrl. Jdjon PrOject lnformat10n
Construchon Protect lnformat10n. Cumulative Condit.ion
NalJOnal Ambient Air Qualijy Standards
2005 Emissions Inven tory for AOCR 24 ( Ions) .

Change In Construction Emissions Assoc, ated with the Proposed Achon Regional Significance Analysis and Companson lo
Conformity De Minim,s Thresholds In AOCR 24
2 -1
1-3
2-2
2-3
3-2
3-3
4-3
4-3
May 2007
General Conformity Appkdbd, ty Anfllysis
Proposed Wastewater Treatment Plant Expans,on at>d
Ptlaso I Racyc/ cd Water SysJcm ,n S.,,""' 9, Ga/~ o,.,,. a Aaor,.l!:!!! and Abbn1v, at,011s AOCR
CAA
CAM

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
A,r Oua l1ty Control Region
CleanAor Act
Clean Air Act Amendments
GARB Califomia Air Resources Board
CEIDARS California Emission Inventory and Reporting System CFR Code or Feder al Regulahons
co
F
FONS I
rR
FY
gpm
m'
mg
NA
NAAOS
NO,
NO,
NSR
o,
Pb
PM
PM2,
PM, 0
ppm
PSD
ROD
SIP
so.
so,
sqft
SRF
lpy
TSP
µg
USC
USEPA
voe
WRCC
wwrP
Carbon monoxide
degrees Fahrenheit
rind ing or No Significant Impact
Federal Regrster
fiscal year
ganons per m1nu1e
cubtc meter
m1llagrams
Not applicable
Nallonal Ambient Air Ouahly Standards
nitrogen d1oxrde
nitrogen o.x1des
New Source Revrew
ozone
lead
parnculatc matter
part1cula1e matter less than or equal to 2 5 microns in aerodynamic diameter partsculate matter less than or equal to 10 microns m aerodynamic diameter parts per m1lhon
Prevention of S,gn1ficanl Detenoral1on
Record of Decision
State Implementation Plan
sulfur dI01<1de
sulfUf OXlcles
square feet
State Revolving Fund
tons per year
total suspended pa rt iculates
mterograms
United States Code
UnKed States Emnronmental ProtecllOn Agency
volatile organic compounds
Western Regional Clima te Center
wastewater treatment plant
Iii May 2007
1152
G• ne,- ill c.onturmsfy Appl, Cabthly AnaJys, s
Proposed Wastewater Treatment Plant Expans, on and
Phase I Rocyc; Jed Water Syslem , n Bann1n9, CelJtorn, d Clean Air Act Con/ Qrm,< z.

SECTION 1

CLEAN AIR ACT CONFORMITY
1 .1 INTRODUCTION
The Clean Air Act ( CAAi requires the U.S. Environmental Protection Agoncy ( USEPA) to promulgate rules that ensure that rederal acllons confonn to the appropriate State Implementation Plan ( SIP). These rules are codified In 40 Code of Federal Regulations ( CFRI Parts 6, 51, and 93. The SIP is a plan that provides for the implementation. maintenance, and enforcement of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards ( NAAQS). This plan provides emission limitations and control measures to attain and maintain the NAAQS . Conformity to a SIP is defined a~ boing consis· tent with lhe SIP's purpose of etiminatrng or reducing the severity and number or violations of the NAAQS and achle\ Jfng expeditious attainment of such standards.

A federal agency responsible for a proposed action i5 required to determine if its actions conform to the applicable SIP. If the action involves the Federal Highway Administration or Federal Transit Authortiy, ii falls under Transportation Conformity Rules. All other Proposed AcUons fall under General Conformity Rules . The Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion and Phase I Recycled Water System in Banning, California is applying for funding from the State Revolving Fund fSRF) Loan Program. The SRF Loan Program rs partially funded by the USEPA and subject to federal environmental regulations , including the General ConfonnitY Rule for the Clean Air Act. Therefore, the proposed Wastewater Treatment Plant E1<pansion and Phase I Recycled Water System in Banning , California is a feder- ally-fu"ded action subject to the USEPA General Conformity rules and must conform to the SIP for the State of Calirornla.

1.2 CONFORMITY BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Section 176( c) of the CAA prohibits federal entities from taking actions in nonaltainment or maintenance areas that do not conform to the SIP for the attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS . Therefore , the purpose of conformity is to:

Ensure federal activities do not interfere with the emission budgets in the SIPs ; Ensure federal acUon-s do not cause or contribute to new violations ; and , Ensure attainment and maintenance of tho NAAQS.
in December 1993 , USEPA promulgated two sets of regulations to implement Section 176( c) of the CAA. First, on December 24, the USEPA promulgated the Transportation Conformity Regulations ( applicable to highways and ma.ss transit) to establish the critcri. 1 and procedure for determining that transportation plans, programs, and projects funded under TIUa 23 U.S.C . or the Federal Transit Act conronn with the SIP ( 58 FR 62188). On December 30 , the USEPA promulgated regulations, known as the Goncral Conformity Regulations ( applicable to all other projects), to ensure that other rederol , iclions also conform to tho SIPs ( 58 FR 63214).

With respect to General ConrormltY, all Proposed Actions, such as the proposed Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion and Phase I Recycled Water System project, are covered unless otherwise exempt. Actions considered exempt from General Conformity include :

Actions covered by Transportation Conformity ;
Action with clearly dG minimis emis5ions ;
Exempt actions listed In the rule ; and ,
Actions covered by a "Presumed lo Conform " demonstration ( an approved list).

Conformity can be demonstrated by :

Showing emission increases arc included in the SIP ;
1-1 May 2007
GeMJral Con/ ot° nllly ~ Mty AM/ y~1s
Proposed Wa3lewarer Trea tmenl Plttnt E. x.pan3' 0'1 and e I Recyded w i!,er System tn Bann, ng, CBlftorr' Jtll
The affected state agreeing to include increases in the SIP; Cleon Ar Act Con formit: t_
No new violations of NAAQS and/ or no increase In the frequency/ severity of violations for areas without SIPs:

Offsets : and ,
Mitigation.

1.3 GENERAL CONFORMITY DETERMINATION PROCESS
The General Conformity Rule consists of three major parts: applicability, analysis, and procedure. Thne three parts are described in the following sections .

1.l.1 Applicability
Attainment Area5
The General Conformity Rule applies to Proposed Actions occurring in air basins designated as nonatt. tinment for criteria pollutants or areas designated as maintenance areas . Proposed Actions occurring in air basins that are in attainment of the NAAQS are not subject to the Conformity Rule.

A criteria pollutant is defined as a pollutant for which the federal and stale governments have established ambient air quality standards, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health and public welfare. A nonattalnment area is any areiil that does not meet or that contributes to ambient air quality in a nearby area that does not moet) the national primary or secondary ambient air quality standard for the pollutanl A maintonanco area is a redeslgnated nonattalnrnent area ror any air pollutant that has attained the national primary ambient air quality standard ror that air pollutant. Criteria pollutants and designation of attainment status are further discussed in Section 3.2.

DtJ Min/ mis Emissions Levels
Threshold ( dP mirumis) rates of om1ss1ons were established in the Final Rule 10 focus conformity requirements on those Proposed Actions with the potential to have significant air quallty Impacts . With the exception of lead , the de mjnimis levels are based on the CAA 's major stationary source definitions for the criteria pollutants ( and precursor criteria pollutants) and vary by the severity of the nonattainmcnt arna. A conformity determination is required when the annuaJ total of direct and indiroct emissions from a Proposed Action occurring Jn a nonattainment or maintenance area equal5 or exceeds the annual de mjnimis Jevets.

Table 1-1 list,, the do minimi• lovcis by pollutant applicable for Proposed Actions In nonattainment areas. The do minimis level for ozone applies to each precursor. volatile organic compounds ( VOC) and nitrogen oxides ( NO,). The de minimis level for P~, applies to each precursor las deemed significant), sulfur dioxido ( SO1), No •. and voe or ammonia . Those levels specific to Air Quality Control Region ( AQCR) 24, the region in which the project is located, are shown In bold type. The project activities will occur in an areil de.signaled as serious nonattainment for CO and PM, 0 ; scvcrc~ 17 nonattainment for 8-hour ozone ; and nonattainment for PMu.

Regional Significance
A Proposed Action that does not exceed the threshold rates or crtterla pollutants may still be subject lo a Gcnorol Conformity dot•rminalion. General Conformity applies if a Proposed Actk> n is considered to be " regionally significanfM, meaning the direct and indireet emissions of any pollutant represent ten ( 10) percent or more of a nonattainment or maintenance area' s emissions inventory for that pollutant.

Exemptions and Presumptions
The flnal rufe contains exemptions from lhe General Confonnity process. Certain Proposed Actions are deemed by the USEPA to conform because of the thorough air quality analysis 1- 2 May2007
1153
GaroraJ Colllo, mly Appl= bihly Analys,s
PropostJd W.siewater r,,,,tmenl Plant E< pdns, o,1 and
Phase I RecycJed water Sptem ) fl &, nrw, g. GahfonJCa ~ an Al A ct Conklrm~ required to comply with other statutory requirements. Examples of these actions include those subject t.o the New Source Review program, and remedial activities under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Llabllity Act.

Table 1-1 ~ Min/ mis Levels ror Criteria Pollutants in Nonattalnnient Areas Pollutant De. si~ n
Senous Nona-nammerit
S•v•re Honattainment -
Ozone· E.•lreme Nonana1nnleflt
Other nonanairmerit • re ~ (?\,11$tde of DLone hansport regton rbon Mono,cide
M"!!9.!lal and moderate nonartainmeot aren nSlde _ozo,lre 11 . ansMn r,..,...,..n All nonalQinment •reaa
Sullur O.OX>de An nonanamme- nt areas
Lead A!I-none,ttamment a,ea9
N11Jog_ en 0. CU.~ AN nonettainmenl area,.

Moderate non<1ttamment "(PM..!.IJ.

Particulate Malter L--- Serious Nonattlinment { PM 1,)
Nonattalnmcnt lPMi 11
nc:tudes. prKUrSors voe or NOa
8 oltl value$ irld lc• t. poUuUnt ,.,.,_ Is • pedfic to AQCR 24 Sc:11u u: -'O C •N 5 1JISJ
I Tons/Veal"
l so
I 25
r 10__
00_ -
501100
100
QQ__
15 ,
oo
100
10 100
Othe.r PropostJd Actions that are exempt from the conformity prO(: css include those actions that would result in no increase In emissions. or an increase in emissions that is clearly de minimfs.

Examples include continuing or recurring activities , routine maintenance and repair. administrative and plann ing actions , land transfers, ~ nd routine movement of mobile aissets.

A federal agency can ostabfJsh Its own presumptions of conformity through separate rulemaking actions. Section 176( c) of the CAA does not specifically exempt any activity. thus a separate analysis would need to show that 1.he activity presumed to conform has no impacts to air quality. Based on this analysis, a federal agency can document that certain types of future actions would be de minimis.

1.3.2 Analysis
A conforftlity analysis for tha Proposed Action ex.amines the impacts of the direct and indirect emissions from mobile and stationary sources, and emissions from any reasonably foreseeable Proposed Action . Indirect emiss ion s are those emissions of a criteria pollutant or its pr~ursors that are caused by the Proposed Actio n but may occur later In time and/ or may be farther removed in distance from the action itself but are still reasonably foreseeable ; and the federal agency can control and will maintain control over the indirect action due to a continuing program responsibility of the federal agency. Reasonably foreseeable emis.sions are projected future indirect emissions that are Identified at the time the conformity detormination is made ; the location of such emissions Is known and the emissions are quantifiable , as described and documented by the federal agency based on its own information and after reviewing any information presented to the rederal agency .

The conformity determination procedure is derailed In 40 CFR 51 .589. The anatysis is based upon the latest planning assumptions. the latest emr. ision estimation techniques . applicable air quality models , databases , and other requirements of the " Guideline on Air Quality Models Revised)" ( USEPA Publication No . 45012- 78 -027R , 1986), and on the tolal of direct and indirect emt' 55ions from the action. Finally, actions required to Issue a eonrormity determination must list mitigation measures and go through the public notice process . Exempt actions are not required to go through this process.

1.3.3 Procedure
Procedural requirements of the conformity rule allow for public review of the federal agency' s conformity detennination. Although the conformity determination is a federal responsibility, state and local air agencies are provided notification and their expertise Is consulted . No 1- l May2007
Ge, wat COOto, m~ y 11pp1, cao, 1~ y AnaJys, s
Proposed Was/ ewotcr Trca// 11Clll Ptant & pa, 1s, on and se / Roeydod Wator Syslom in Bann,ng, CaJ"iforrua Clean AirAct Conform1!X_ documentation or public panlclpalion Is required for applicability analyses that result In de minimis determinations.

The federal agency must provide a 30-day notice of the Proposed Action and draft conformity detennlnation to the appropriate USEPA Region , and state and focal air control agencies. The federal agency must also make the draft determination available to the public to allow opportunity for review and comment.
1-4 May 2007
1154
General Con/ om,, ry Apphalbi/ dy An81ysis
Proposed W:ute1;1-alet T,eaunant Plant upans,on a,ld
Phase I Recycled Water Sysi em rrt i3dllniog, Califot_ ntiJ Descnpt, on ol lhe Propos« I AdJOt1 SECTION 2

DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION
Tho City of Banning proposes to expand its existing 3.6 mgd wastewater- treatment plant and construct additional supporting structures to support the City 's planned recycled water storage and distribution capability In accordance with the Banning Recycled Water Master Plan . 2 .1 LOCATION OF THE

PROPOSED ACTION
The City of Banning is located
in Riverside County
approximately 20 miles west or
Palm Springs along the
Interstate 10 ( 1-1 OJ corridor .

Figure 2-1 shows the general
location of lhe project area .

The Proposed Action is located
within AQCR 24.

2.2 PURPOSE OF THE

PROPOSED ACTION
The purpose of the project is to
provide the ell:i.sting Banning
WWTP with upgrades
necessary to process high
strength wastewator gcnoratod
in the service aroa and produce
Tille 22 recycled water. The
Proposed Action would
provide a recycled water
r•· pF-~~ ...........

Los Anee'-!:" ......... ,,___• •• • Yao~ iii • • ..
t ..... ,,_-:-; - iii,.,__... --
IU6,. .. •• ,: }. r··•
c.-
G •·•~ -, •
I .............. • ....,' 4~ 1- 1 it ........,.._-.

MwO,,, c
ar,tk
OcN•
l__--~
u
J. J;~
u:I1,,,.... .. ..,.,.... -~-
i,l'lt$.M-.-.....-.

Figure 2-1 Location of the Prop0<sed Action
distribution system to meet the ongoing and projected water supply needs for the Sun Lakes and Five Bridges housi ng areas , Recycled water would be used primarily for irrigation of street medians , greenbelts 1 parks and go,r courses. Surplus recycled water availible during certain times of the year would be stored In reservoirs for future use or percolated into the East Banning groundwater aquirer.

2.3 ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION

2.3.1 Project Construction
As shown on Table 2.1, several areas of construction will be associated with the Proposed Action :

Expansion of Existing WWTP. This project would include construction of the expansion on approximately 16 of the 126 total acres of property at the Banning WWTP. The expansion include5 an aboveground water storage rc.servoir1 etectrical controls/laboratory building , a chlorine contact tank, and the facility for the MBR process . installation of 3,500 feet of pipeline. Existing Well R1 , east of the WWTP and its percolation ponds, would be retrofitted in order to extract and convey groundwater into the treatment process . Approximately 3,500 feet of buried pipeline would be constructed from the wellhead to the access road and along Charles Street to the WWTP eapanslon site. Pipeli ne construction would typically include trenching to a depth of approximately five feet in a corridor approximately five feet wide, placing of bedd ing material, laying of pipe , backfilling the trench and repaving the street or restoring landscaping . 2-1 May2007
General Conformly Appltca~ t,ty Anatys, s
Proposed Wastewater Treatmcro Plant ExpanSKJn and
Phase I Recycled Wa ler Syslem , n Bann, ng, Col, tomio 2- 2
Descnpt, on ol lhe Proposed Acron
May2007
1155
General Conlormlly Appl, t;,8btllty A udly& JS
Proposed l-'Va.stawarcr Tre;iJmenr Plnnl ExpanSKJ,(I and Phaso I Rocyded Wator System 1n Banmng. Ct11, lcx n1a Descr, phon of l!fe_ Pro(!osed Acf, on Table 2-1 Constru ction Project lnfonnation
Project Area DctmoliUon Sbtrt Date I Duration
Protect fsnll) { sa ftl IFYI tmoothsl
Expaos, on of existing 1/ tM/ l P 418. 116 NA 08 I
8 mon1hs
lns1a11a1t0n of 3, 500 feet of pipe •, ne 35000 NA oe 3 month. s lnstat1at• on of 5 m1 es or pq> elrne 264.000 N A 08 24 mon th$ lotal 717 , 176 NA NA ' NA
f3,.5oed on uanctu, g to ii dl! ptn ol a.pproxtf' l'Qtely he lee1 n a oomdor approioma. lety ftw feet w<te Installation of !5 miles of pipeline. Approximately S miles of re-cycled water pi peline would be constructed from the existing WWTP to the Sun Lakes housing development to the wesL Pipeline construction would typically inchJde trenching to a depth of approximately five f'eet in a corridor approximately five fe.et wicle, placing of bedding material, laying of pipe , backfilling the trench and repaving the street or restoring landscaping Four other past and reasonably foreseeable projects could occur during the same lime period as the Propos ed Action . Table 2-2 lists the construcUon projects.

Table 2-2 Co nstruction Project Information , Curnulativc Condition - OemotiUon
Projec t A re: i (
Squaro
St. 11r1D. ita OuratJon
Proj•tt ( Squa~ Feet) Feetl (
FY) ( month•! -
Lennar FM! Bndges 23 870. 880 a 08 72
Mopar Drag Coy 2 613 600 0 08 12 -
Sun lake5 ( Commere& a l > 2 047 .320 0 08 36
Bann1n;, BusH1ess Cenlel 392 040 0 06 ,, -
Tola! 28 923. 840 0 NA NA
Lennar Five Bridges Development. Lennar has proposed a new community on 548 acres or lan d located wost of Sunset Avenue south of the lntersta1e 10 and tho Un lon Pacific Ra i lroad right- of- way . The Draft Specifi c Plan EIR is in public review. Included in the development are 2,160 residences, m ostly comprised of single- family dwellings with donsitic- s ranging from 3 units to 8 units per acre. There are about 95 patio homes and 273 townhouses at a higher density, with 51 . 6 acres of commercial retail space, 106. 2 acres of parks and open space, and a site for a new fire station . A major improveme11t wou ld be a grade separation between the Union Pacific Rai lroad tracks and Sunset Avenue, which is scheduled to begin construction in 2008.

Mopar Drag City. Drag City, under construction just south of the Bann ing Munic ipal A irport ru nway, will Include a tra ck surface , lights for night racing , and a depressed design to llmrt the Impact of noise on adjacent areas. Drag City will include a quarte r ~mife regulation drag strip and bleacher sea ting for up to 10,000 people on approximately 60 acres .

Sun Lakes Commercial ProJecL The Sun Lakes Sp ec ific Plan includes 47 acre5 of vacant commerclal land north of the Sun Lakes reside ntial subd ivision and south of Inters tate

10. This commercial acreage is east of th e Albertson ' s/K -Mart Shopping Pl aza on Highland Sp rings Avenue . Plans for this project would Include a new aulo mall and medical offices along Sun Lak es Boulevard .

Banning Bus iness Center. Tho Banning Bus iness Center is a p lan ned business park that would offer condomi nium space to offic.o. light manufacturing and service retail users.

Located on nine acras at the northwest comer of 4th Street and Lincoln Street, the 2- 3 May 2007
Gcncml Con! ormJty Appbcability Atta/ ys, s
Proposed Wastewater Trea tment Plant ExpanSJOn and
Pha se I Recycled Wafer System , n_ Banntng. Galdorma Dcscnp1_, on of the Proposoo ~, on business park would have access to Interstate 10 from the 8th Street exit. which is grade• separated from the Union Pacific Railroad tracks .

Z-4 May2007
1156
General Contornvry ApphcebJJy An: JJysss
ProfJ0$« 1 WaslewatG- 1 Trcatrnenr Plant ExpanSIOl' I and Phase 1Reel!:!!!!!,_ Water Sys1cm in Bann, ng. Cahfo< rtlil SECTION 3

EXISTING AIR QUALITY
ExJSIJrtg AJT Oualny
Air quality Is cha racterized by the e,risting concentrations of various air pollutants , and the climatic and meteorological conditions within an area. Precipitation . wind d frection and speed horizontal airflow), and atmospheric stability ( vertical airflow) are factors that determine the extent of pollutant dispersion .

3.1 METEORLOGICAL CONDITIONS
The B~nning area experiences consistent wind conditions. The average annual wind speed is S.0 knots. The wind averages 4.S knots during the winter months and 5.5 knots during the summer months. During Jun e through August, the predominant wind directions are from the west- northwest and typically have the hlghesl average wind speed of 5.5 knots ( WRCC, 2007)- The Bann ing area experiences mild temperatures with an average annual temperature of 76 degrees Fahrenh eit ("FJ. The warmest months are July and August with a mean monthly temperature of 94" F and January is the coldest month with a mean monthly temperature of 37• F WRC C, 2007).

The Banning area experiences mod orate precipitation . Most of the precipitation falls during the winter months of December through March . The average precipitation during this time period is

3.0 inchos per month . Throughout the rest of tho year , the average precipitation is only 0.7 inches per month . The average ann ual precipitation is 18 Inches ( WRCC , 2007).

3.2 CRITERIA POLLUTANTS AND STANDARDS
The NAAQS were established by the USE PA for six pollutants. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the federal and state governments have established ambient air quality standards, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health.

Critoria pollutants cause or contribute to air pollution which could endangerthe public health or welfare. The USEPA has described the potential health and welrare effects of these pollutants.

It is on the basi s of these crite ria and the health and welfare objectives that the standards arc set or revised .

The six criteria pollutants are ozone ( 01). particu lato m:.1ttcr ( PMu iind PM ,0), nitrogen djoxide NO,!, carbon mono xide ( CO), sulfu r dioxide ( SO,), and lead ( Pb). Even tho ugh ozone is a regulated criteria pollutant. it is not dlreclly emitted from sources. Ozone forms as a result of VOC and NO . reacting with sunlight in thg atmos phe re .

The General Conformity Ru le addresses the impact of the Proposed Action on the area' s attainment of the NAAQS. The NAAQS for the criteria pollutants are shown in Table 3-1 .

Air qua lity is determined by comparing ambjent air levels with the . appropriate primary or secondary NAAQS for eac h criteria pollutant. National primary slandards estab lish the level of air quality necessary to allow an adequate marg in of safety to protect the public heath . National secondary standards establish the level of air q uality noccssary to protect the public welfare from any known or anticipa ted adverse effects of a pollutant. 3- 1 May 2007
General Coofonooy Applicability Analysis
Proposed Waste11; o1er Trsc1lment Plant. Expansion aro
se IRec}'ded Wale, Sys/em"' Ba,orung . C,,Mom,. busbng M Ouabty Table 3-1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Pollubnt
Avcragii1g Foderal Standards
Timo Primary Secomlary
Ozone ( 0 ,)
lHO\. W NoSlimdard
Same c1s P nrnary Standard
8Houl' 0 08 ppm ( 157 µglm')
Respir~ ble
24 Hour 150 µg/ m1
Particulilte Annual
Same as
Matter( PM1-) A nthmehc
Prrna ry S~ ndatd
Mean
24 HoUf 65µg/ m Fi
ne Partit;_ urate Annual Ssme as Maner(
PM u ) Anthme1ic 15 µg1m' Pumary Sl andard ------- J..
1ttan - Carbon
Monoxide 8tlour
9 ppm ( 10 mgfmi) None (
CO)
1 Hour 35 ppm ,~o mgl m') - Nittogen
Dioxide Annual
I
0 053 ppm ( 100 µglm') Same as Ar1ihmet1e
NO,) Mean
Primary
Standard Average
Same
8-5 Leii
d Calender 1 5 JJQl' m1 Primary
S1andard Ou.
an"' Annual
Anthmehc
0 030 ppm ( 80 µglm ') - Sulfur
Dioxide Mean SO,)
24 HoUI 0 14 ppm ( 365 µglm' J -3
Hour - 05 ppm ( 1300 µg, m ~ lee~:=~ ~~.

J=!_ kl s~:" or: u:;,:,•~ ~~~=': c.~~ 7U ~~ w"=:al htlp ffep.'\ ~• l cnteria hlmff:2 Areas
not meeting ambient airquality standards are designated as being in nonattainmenl forthe specific
0 pollutant causing the violation. The CAA Amendments of 1990 ( CAAA) further classified 1, CO, and PM nonattainment areas based on the magnitude of the problem. Depending on the elassiflcatfon (e.g., oz. one : margina~ moderate, serious, severe , o r extreme,, an area must adopt certain air pollution reduction measures . The classification also determ ines when the area must achieve analnmenL 3.

2.1 Ozono, O2one
is not emitted directly into the air but is formed through chemical reactions between natural and man- made emissions of VOC and NO, in the presence of sunlight. Thus , voe and NO. a re referred to as 11 precursor-" of oz. one. The l evelof ozone in tho air d&pends on the ou tdoor levels of these organic ga~es, the radiant emuyy ot the sun . and other weather con ditions. The b igge,.ti;;once,. n with high ~one con,;e ntraHo nsis the damage It c auses to human health . vegetation and many common materials used everyday. High ozone conc. entrations can ca use shortness of breath, c oughing , wheezing, headaches, nausea , eye and throat Irritations and lung damage. 3.

2.2 Carbon Monoxid e Carbon
monoxide is a co lorless, odorless and tasleless toxic gas found naturally In trace quantities inthe atmosphere and emtned from a ny f orm of combustion . At low concentrations, 3- 2 May 2007
1157
General Coolatmlty l<pp(icat,,hlJ' Analysl•
Proposed w~ .. ,~W , lf{'( Trea hn«II Pi.ant L.lpa, JSIOll and Philse I Recycled Water system ,n BanrwJg. Cahfom1;, Ex1s1,ng AK OUtrUy the central nervous system is affected . At higher conccntrations 1 irrltablllty, headaches, rapid breathing , blurred vision, lack of coordination , nausea and dizziness can all occur. It is especially dangerous indoors when ventilation is inadcqualc i unconsciousness or death can occur.

3.2.3 Nitrogen Dioxide
Nitrogen dioxide is a reddish- brown to dark brown polsonous gas that produces an irritating odor. It is a byproduct of high combustion so urces. Health effects include damage to lungs, bronchial an d respiratory system irrit atio n , headaches, nausea. coughing, choking and chest pains.

3.2 .4 Sulfur Dioxide
Sulfur dioxide is a colorless gas with a strong suffocating odor. II is a gas resulting from the burning of sulfur- containing fuels. Exposure to so, can irritate the respiratory system Including lung and throat irritations and nasal bleeding. In the presence of moisture, S~ can form su lfuric acid that c.an cause damag e to vegetation .

3.2.5 Suspended Particulate Matt er
There are two categories of particulate matter: particles w ith diameters less than 10 microns PM,.) and particles with diameters less than 2.5 microns ( PMu ). The soun: RS of PM ,. emls: slons include Industrial and agricult ural operations, automobile exhaust, and co nstruction .

Sources of fine particles Include all types of combustion activities ( i.e., motor veh ic les, pow er plants , wood burning) and certain Industria l processe5 . PM , 0 poses a health concern because it can be inhaled into, and accumulate in, the respiratory system. PM. u is referred to as " fine·· pa rti cles and Is believed to pose th e grea te st health risks. Because of their small size a pp roxima tely 1130th the average width of a human hair), fine particles can lodge deeply into the lungs.

3.2.6 Lead
L&ild is a bluish -white to silvery gra y solid. Lead partlcles can originate from motor vehicle exhaust, Industria l smelters and battery plants . Health effects. Include docreasod motor function , reflexes and learning as well as damage to the central nervous system. kidn eys and brain . At high levels of expos ure, seizures, coma or Cleath may occur.

3. 3 AIR QUALITY CONTROL R EGION
Tho State of California is divided into a number of areas designated as air basins. The Proposed Action is located in the Metropolitan Los Angeles Air Quality Control Region, which Includes parts of the c.ountiH of Los Angeles. San Bernardjno, Riverside, Ventura and Santa Barbara . This area is known as Air Qu al ity Control Region 24 ( AQCR 241. The air basin is undor th~ jurisdiction of South Coast Air Quality Management Oislnct. Ventura County Air Pollut ion Contro l Distric t and the San ta Barbara County Air Pollution Control DistricL Table 3· 2 lists the air emissions for the AQCR 24 for 2005.

Table 3-2 20D5 Emissions Inventory for AQCR 24 ( tons ) co voe NO, so. PM ,. PM11

1.636. 843 327405 4 t 1 757 JS .'78 129, 539 52 524
Souroe CARB 7007

3.3.1 Att ainme nt Status
Areas not meeting amb ien t air quality standards are designated as being In nonattainment for the specific pollutant causing the violation . National standards other than for ozone, particulates and those based on annual avv~ g~ arc not to be eJC.ceeded rnore than once a year.

The 8-hour ozone standard is attain ed when the 3-year average of the 4th highest dally J .J May2007
Gene, a/ 0,,,! o, m, ty Apphcabd, ty An. rlj, JIS
Proposed Wastewater Treotment Pf:>nt E., pansion and
Phase I Recyded Wate, Sys/em 111 Bannrng. c,,_,.., f:11151/ng Alf Otsal<ly concentrations Is 0.08 ppm or less. T'1e 24-hour PM ,. standard is attained whon tho 3-yoar average of the 99th percenti le of monitored concentrations is IHs than 150 JJglm1 . The 24-hour PM,. standard Is attained when the 3-year average of 98th perc entiles is less than 65 µgim '.

Except ror the national panlculate standards, annual standards nc met if the annual avuragu falls below the standard at every site. The national annua l particulate standard for PM,. is met if the 3- year average falls below the standard at every site. The annual PM,_, standanl is met if the 3-year average of annual averages spatially- averaged across officially designed clusters or sites falls below the standard .

3.3.1.1 Ozone
In 1997, the USEPA promulgated the 8-hour oz.one slandanl . On April 15, 2004, USEPA Issued tha firSl 8-hour ozone designallons. Before that date, ozo ne atta inment designations were determined by the 1- hour oz.one standanl or 0.12 ppm. The new 8- hour standard became effective 60 days after promulgation ( June 15, 2004}, while the ex isti ng 1-hour standard, for most purposes, remains In effect until USEPA determines an area has air quality meeting the 1- hou r standard .

In relation to General Conformity, tho propor de minimis thra- shold to uso to determine conformity depends upon when the Proposed Action begins. Actions beginning bofora June 15, 2005 must meet the 1 -hour ozon e de m i.nimis threshold . Action s beginning on or after Juno 15, 2005 must meet the 8- hour ozone cle mi11imi$ threshold ( Personal Communication, 20041.

Since tho Proposed Action is scheduled to start after June 151 2005. the 8-hour ozono throshold applies.

According to 40 CFR 81 .305, AQCR 24 has been designated as seve re-17 nonattalnment for the 8-hour 01one standard.

3.3.1.2 Particulate Matter
On Ja nuary 5, 2005, US EPA Iss ued the first PM,. designations. Before that date, PM attainment designations were detennined by the PM,, standard of 150 ug/ m1• The new PM, s standard became gffective 90 days aft.er promulgation on April 5. 2005, while the existing PM 10 standard, fo r most purposes , remains in effoct until USEPA determines an area has air quality meeting the PM 11 standard.

In relation to General Conformity, the proper de minimis threshold to use to detennine conformity depends upon whun th e Proposed Action Finding of No Significant Impact ( FONSI) or Record of Decision ( ROD) is signed . Oocumonts signed before April 5, 2006 must meet the PM,. d& minimis threshold . Documents signed on or after April 5, 2006 must meet the PM: n de minimis threshold ( Personal Communication , 2005). This c rlterla does not apply to the proposed Wastewater Troatment Plant Expansion and Phase I Rec.ycfed Water System in Bann ing . which Is subject to General Conformity requirements as part of its SRF Joan applic. alion process.

Acc ording to • o CFR 81 . 305, AQCR 24 has been designated as nonaltainment for PM,, and as serious nonatta inment for PM, •.

3.3.1.3 Nitrogen Dioxide
According to 40 CFR 81 . 305, AQCR 24 has been designated as cannot be classif" led or better than national standards for NO2 •

3.3. 1.4 Sulfur Dioxide
Accord ing to 40 CFR 81 .305. AQCR 24 has been designated as better than nation. 11 standards for SO ,.

J-4 May2007
1158
General Contc,, m, ly Aopl, cabtldy Analys, s
Propos« J WaSiowatcr Troa tmont Plant Expansion snd
Phase I Recycled _ l-¥atcr System in Bann, ng, CaMorrna

3.3.1.5 Carbon Monoxide
E.rl.SlJn') AK Oualdy
According to 40 CFR 81 .305, AQCR 24 has been designated serious nonattainmenl for CO.

3.3.1.6 Lead
There is no information concerning lead In 40 CFR 81.305 for any part of California; therefore, the area has been designated as .. cannot be classified .. for lead . 3- 5 May2007
Gef> efil/ Conformity , tlppJ, cabt/~ y J\n;JlySIS
Propased w a~ tt1wa ler rreatment Pfdrit [;~ an: s, on f'ttd Pha:.·e I Rac: yr;Jed Walut' Sy: dom 111 Ba, uw, g. Cabfcxru SECTION 4

ANALYSIS AND RES ULTS
Anall, 5ts and Resufls
This section includes a comprohcnsivc analysis of tho resultant omissions from the Proposed AcUon . The purpose of this analysis ls to determine whether the Proposed Action will confonn to the SIP as specified in Section 176( c) of the CA.A. A p0$ itive confonnity determination can be demonstrated by determining that Iha Proposed Action doe5 not increase emissions with respect to the current emissions . A discussion of the overall analytical methodology, emission change5 by sources and a conclusion of Goneral Conformity arc presented in this chapter.

Appendix A contains supporting air pollutant emission calculations. 4 .1 CONFORMITY DETERMINATION METHODOLOGY

4.1.1 Analytic. al Methods
Tho methodology for the Gcner.11 Conformity analysis for the Proposed Action consisted of the following stops;: ( 1j determine th@ pollutants of concern based on the attainment st3tus of the air basin ; (2) define the s,:ope of the ProJ>05ed Action: ( 3) calculate emissions based on the scope; t4) review not emission changM for de mirtimis threshold levels and regional significance ; ( 5) determine conformity for applicable criteria pollutants.

The emission factors applied in the analysis are based on USEPA guidance. Fugitive dust would be generated from activities associated with site clearing , grading, cut and fill operations , and from vehicular traffic moving over the disturbed site. These emissions would be greatest during the initial site preparation activities and would vary from day 10 day depending on the construction phase, level of activity , and prevailing weather conditions .

The quantity of uncontrolled fugitive dust emissions from a construction site is proportional to the area of land being worked and the level of construction activity. Thu USEPA estimates that uncontroUed fugitlve dust emissions from ground- disturbing activities would be emjtted at a rate or 80 lbs of total suspended particulate ( TSP) per acre J>er day of disturbanco ( USEPA, 1995). In a USEPA study of air sampling dala at a distance of 50 meters downwind from construction activities, PM, 0 emissions from various open dust sources were detennined based on the ratio or PM,a to TSP sampling data. The average PM10 to TSP ratios for top soil removal 1 aggregate hauling, and cut and fill operations are reported as 0.27, 0.23 , and 0.22, respectively USEPA, 1988). Using 0.24 as the average ratio for purp05es of analysis, the emission factor for PM10 dust omis! llons becomes 19.2 lbs per acre per day of disturbance.

The USEPA also assumes that 230 working days are available per year for construction accounting for weekends , weather, and holidays}, and that only half of these working days would result in uncontrolled fugitive dust emissions at the emitted rate de,- cribed above USEPA, 1995). The USEPA estimates that the effects of fugitive du•I from construction activitles would be reduced slgnificanUy with an effective watering program . Watering the disturbed area of the construction site tw; ce per day with approximatety 31500 gallons per aero per day would reduce TSP emissions as much as 50 percent ( USEPA, 1995).

Specific information describing the types of construction equipment required for a specific task, the hours the equipment Is operated, and the operating conditions vary widely from project to project. For purposes of analysis, these parameters were estimated using est'ablished cost cstimaiting methodologies for construction and experience with stmilar types of c.onstruction projects ( Means, 1996}. Combustive emissions from construction equipment exhausts wore estimated from USEPA approved emissions factors for heavy duty diesel powered construction equipment ( US EPA 1985).

Additional PM emls&lon factorS are from the California Air Resources Board ( CARB) PM Profile CARS , 2002) and USEPA estimates for PM,, ( USEPA , 2005). 4-1 May 2007
1159
General Confomuty Apµl, cablolt Analys, s Proposed Wastc , v.:uer Treatment Plant E,,,,.,,: s, on and Ph:

Jso I Rocyciod Water System in Bann, ng. Catiom, a 4.

1.2 Pollutants of Concern Analys,
s at> d Resulls Th~
area affected by the Proposed Action is in scvcre- 17 nonattainment tor8-hour ozone as described in Section 3.3.1.1; serious nonattainmcnt for PM10 and nonattainment for PM2..1as described in Section 3.3.1.2; and, serious nonattainmcnt for carbon monoxide 4'S described in Section

3.3.1.5. Consequently, direct and indirect emissionsof voe and NO'!; ( precursors: to ozono), as well as CO, PM 11, and PMu,. resulting from the Proposed Action are subject toa conformity determination. Thus, the conformity analysis will focus on only these pollutants . 4.

1.3 Applicability As
discussed in Section 1.J.1, the Proposed Action confonns for a criteria pollutant ifthe emissions forthat pollutant do not exceed the do min/ mis thresholds specified inthe Final Conformity Rule (see Table 1-1). Conversely, ifthe total direct and indirect emissions of a pollutant exceed its de minimis threshold , a formal General Confonnity Determination is required for that pollutant. 4.
2 CHANGES IN EMISSIONS FROM THE PROPOSED ACTION The
Proposed Action will affecl the total amount of emissions from several categories of sources.

The analysis includes all sources subject to the change inemtSsion rates, exclusive of any stationary sources that are subject to review and that may require apermit under the New Source Review (NSR) or Prevention ol Significant Deterioration fPSD) programs. The emissions associated with the Proposed AcUon are included inthe analy§is . 4 .

2. 1 Construction Emissions
from construction activity are considered area emissions, although short-term, while emissions from vehicles !mpporting construction are considered mobile sources. 4.

2.1.1 Methodology Emission
factor§ from the USEPA were used to estimate construction. related air pollutant emissions.

These factors include on-site construction equipment and workers ' travel . Several construction areas are anticipated insupport orthe Proposed Action. The Banning area has four other past and reasonably foreseeable actions that could occur during the s~me period as the Proposed Action. The fi~cal year (FY) with the greatest emissions was used to present the extreme condition inthis analysis. 4.

2.1 .2 Results Table
4-1 summarizes the net emission changes anticipated from construction activities. An increase In emissions ls logic al. The USEPA watering factor for reducing particulate matter emissions has been applied In these calculations . 4,

2.2 Summary of Results Tabl&

4.2 comparos thenet change Inemissions associated with the Proposed Action with de minimis thresholds for AQCR 24 and states whether or not the emissions exceed de minimis or would be regionally significant4-
2 May 2007 General
Conformity Appbcat» liry Analysis Proposed
Was tewater I reatmenl Pranl t xp/ JnSJOO and Phastt
I Recycled Water SysJem mSifnmng, Cafiforrna An3lf$ 1S and R esufls Table 4-1 Change in Construction Emissions Associated with the Proposed Action Pollutants Emitted lonsfve.
ar) co
voe HOx SOx PM, s I PM,,, p..,.,..,.
stKJ Actiott Construct1on EJi:
plHlSMJn of exl$1109 ' WNTP 0. 66 0. 13 1. 61 0. 17 3. 64 0. 62 l nstadat10n of3. 500 feet or ?, 4) ehne 0. 00 0. 00 0. 01 0. 00 0. 56 0. 09 l11 5ta~t1on of 5 mtles of ptpeline 0. 01 0. 00 0. 02 0. 00 8. 37 1. 42 Net Chii nge 1n F m,5, Sl() l\g A$50CUlled 0.
67 0. 13 1. 65 0. 18 12. 28 2. 09 Wllh
the Propo~ d Acuon. Cumulative
Condition Project Construction Lonnar
rive Bridges · 154.
57 19. 69 137. 18 0. 00 6 . 76 1. 15 -Mopa,
Drag City 13.
31 2. 14 25. 95 2. 81 12. 72 2. 16 Son
Lakes ( Commeroal) 3.
42 0. 35 3. 40 0. 36 26 . 17 4 . 45 Banning
Su5tne~ Ceoter 6.
29 1. 15 13. 74 1. 49 5. 88 1. 00 N•
t Chang@ In Emicslon< tfrom 177. 59 23. 33 180. 28 4. 65 51 . 52 8. 76 Cumulallvt nmbg atl!d
Condition
e m,uaons Hlimate
Prolccts
1aken from
l/
Tabte 4 '\ i, QI l he Cnft [IR 10f rtie five 8t, dgrts Spoor. c Plan ( Nov 2006} Thc. se envss1ons are suo, ecl 10 cnanoe •no 1he conMJuchon tt~rt oate tor It. p ,c, 11d G not t.nown al 1his 1111' 1!! Table 4-2 Regional Significance Analysis and Comparison to Conformjty De Minimis Thresholds in AOCR 24 PolluL\
nlS Emitted l\onolvearl Cat*
OOrv co voe NO,_ so. PM1 .. t PMu Em
1551CN1S Inventor, 1 636 843 327 405 "' 1'; 1 35, 478 129, 539 5252• --- PtOfE" ci fmt5510fl~ 0. 67 0. 13 1. 65 0. 18 12. 28 2. 09 Perc:
eflt Change negligible negligible negligible negligible negligible Inegligi;;;:-,_ cle"""""'• Th, eshold 100 25 25 NA 70 100 Exceed
de mInrrms No
No No NA No No Threshold'? Reg.
onally S,gnmcan t' No No No NA No No 1•
10' 1',) NA =
Not applicablD because de min/ mis does not apply sim;:e this AQCR is in attair1ment forthis particular pollutant. Bold ,
noicate- s polk« ants of conoe, n kx Confamt! ly C>ete, m1nation 4. 3 CONFORMITY DETERMINATION RESULTS As
explained in Section 4 .1. 31 a conformity determination isrequired ifthe total direct and indirect emissions ofa pollutant from the Proposed Action exceed the de minimis threshold established in the Final Rule. The emissions must be compared to the air quality emissions 4. 3 May 2007
1160
Gcooral Confom11ty App{ K; aMty An;,/ ysls
Proposed Was.~ w,cifer Trea lmenl PfanJ E,1;ps, ns, ot1 and p,,.,, 5e I Recyc.: UK1 Water System tn Bann.-, g. Cah/ omt:, Ma~ s and Results inve ntory of the air bas in to determi ne regio nal significance of the Proposed Action wh en th e total nonattainment criteria pollutant emissi ons do not exceed tho de minimis thresholds. The Proposed Action is considered reg ionally significant for a particular pollutant if the amount of emissions is greater than 10 percent of the emissions inventory. Regionally significant actions must be further reviewed to determine conformity .

4.3.1 Proposed Action
De Min1ms Levels
Table 4 -2 summarizes the Proposed Action emissions in AQCR 24 and compares them to th e de minimis thresholds . As a result of the Proposed Action, them would be an increase In emissions for CO , PM,., PM,_., so,, voe and NO,. A Proposed Action conforms to the applicable SIP when criteria pollutants do not exceed their respective de minimis thresholds of:
100 tons per year ( tpy) for CO and PMu; 70 tpy for PM,.; and, 25 tpy for VOC and NO,. CO, NO, and PM1c em issions do not exceed their respective de minimis threshold. A Proposed Action does not conform to the app licable SIP when criteria pollut. ants exceed their respective de min; mi s thresholds .

Regionat Signif ic anc e
Th e Proposed Action is not cons idered to be reg ionally significant because the CO, PMu1, PM: u.

SO:1:, VO C and NO ,. emi ssion s are less than 10 percent of the emissions inventory ( see Table 4 - 2 ).
4 .4 CONCLUSION
The Proposed Ac tion will occur In an area designated as severe - 17 nonattainmont for 8-·hour ozon e; serious nonattalnment for PM10 and nonanalnment for PMn: serious nonattainmcnt for carbon mono x.ide. Thu s, lhis conformity determi naUon focuses on only the criteria pollutants of CO, PM ,., PM ,., VOC and NO,..

The analys is of direct and indirect emiss ion changes from mobile and stationary sources and rea sonably foreseeabl e and controllable ac tions for the Proposed Action supports a positi ve conformity determination.

The total of direct and indirect CO, PM, o. and NOx em issions are below the de m;nimis threshold establi shed lor th es e pollutants ( s ee Table 4•2). Additionally, the em issions of CO, VOC, SO,, PM ,c, PM u and NOx would be less than 10 percent of the emissions inventory and , therefore, th e action wou ld not be con sidered regionally slgnificant ( see Table 4 -2). It has been determined that th e Proposed Action pos itively conforms to the applicable SIP. The City is supporting an activity that has been demonstrated by USEPA standards not to caus e or contribute to new violation: s of iilny natio nal amb ient air qua lity standard in the affe c-ted area , nor would this ac tion inc rease the frequency or severity of an existing vk>lation . Implementat ion of he Prop osed AcUon will not delay Umely analnment of any standards In AOCR 24, and the ac tion is In compli anc e o r Is co ns istent with all re feva" t requirement s and milestones contai ned In the appl ica ble SIP. Th is co nclus ion or pos itive Genera l Conrormity for the Proposed Action fulfill s the City 's oblig ation and res ponsibility under 40 CFR Part 93, Subpart B. 4 May 2007
General Con/o,mily Applicabi/ Jfy AnafystS
Proposed Wasle~ ter Treatment Plant &. pans,on •nd
Phase I Recycled Wa ler Syslem , n Bann, ng Caltlom, a References SECTION 5

REFERENCES
40 Code or Federal Regulations , Part 51 - Requirements for Preparation, Adoption , and Submittal of Implementation Plans. July 2006.
40 Code of Federal Regulations , Part 81 - Des ignation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes .

July 2006.

California Air Resources Board ( CARBI , 2002 . Air Resources Board PM Profile ID 112, California Emiss ion Inventory and Reporting System ( CEIDARS). September 26.

CARB, 2007 . 2005 Estimated Annual Average Emissions for South Coast Air Basin and Ventura and Santa Barbara Counties. http:// www. arb. ca.gov/ ei/mapslstatcmap/ abmap. htm Means, 1996. 1996 Means Building Construcrion Cost Data . 54th Annual Edition, R.S. Means Company. Incorporated. Kingston , Massac husetts.

Personal communication, 2004. A. Schnapp ( Parsons) with D. Stonefield ( USEPA). July 21 , 2004.

Personal communicati o n, 2005. A. Sc hnapp ( Parsons) with D. Stonefield ( USEPA). August 15, 2005 .

Western Regional Climate Center ( WRCC), 2007. Data obtained for the State of California . http:// wwwwrcc. dri. edul cg i-binlc liMAIN. pl ?ca1250 http: llwww. wrcc .dri. edu/ htmlfilHlwestwlnd . linal. html and http: llwww. wrcc. dri. edu/ htmlfileslwestwinddir. hlml Accessed on April 27 , 2007 .

United St.ates Env ironment. al Protection Agency ( USEPA), 1985. Compilation of Air Pollutant Emiss ; on Factors , Volume I: Stationary Point and Area Sourr; es and Volume II : Mobile Sources, AP-42, 4th Edition with Supplements, Un~ ecl Slates Env ironmental Protection Agency. Ann Arbor. Michigan. September.

USEPA, 1988. Gap Filling PM,. Emission Factors for Selected Open Area Dust Sources . EPA450 f4-88-003 . Research Triangle Pari<. February.

USEPA, 1995. Compilation of Air Pollutant Factors , Volume 1: Stationary Point and Area Sources AP-42). 5•• Edition . Ann Arbor. January.

USEPA, 2005. EJtamination of th e Multiplier Used to Estimate PM1., Fugitivo Dus t Emissions from PM ,., PowerPo lnt Presenlatlon made at the USEPA Emission Inventory Conference. April. 5 -1 May 2007
1161
General Conformity Applicabtbty Analy,,,s
Proposoo Wastowarcr Troarmcnt Plant Expansion amt
Phaso I Recycled Wator System in Banning. Cshfom/a
5- 2
References
May: Z007
General Qmronm1y App/icab/11/y Analys, s
Proposed Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion and
Phase IRecycled Waler System in Banning, Galifomia / lpfH,n_dixA May2007
1162
i .

I
l
r,. I
flJJ" fjlf ~:} iH r f l d
J ... !
IIi
I • Ji E fn
n1n I f11
r : I
I
I• I
E • = ~ Ia ~~~ OO@BI ---
f~ ~ . .::
ii - l i 1
i

J I , I
i ~~I '
i (!
l 11 ·· 8 I
i ' ' .... , t
f
E .. ".
r f,
ad •; f 1 I I i JP
J. ~
d t" . 11 J I! r I r rH
n 1tJf
rt • • • r I I"
f
i ti
l h i
i
i _ I I
i ' ' ; Ia ~~ 000001 i • • 8
H
Ii 1 1 , r
ii l~f I
ii' ' .
h
11 ~· B I "
H ; ' "
J ,.
i ' '' ' i
1163
t
H . ~
l l} fH
i
wl' • I!! ' ' !
t . ' d
I • i
i
I! ~
i
l
f • ~~
OOOOBI E • ' • ~ 0
H
1I i
i
i ' " ii · i I
l1 ~~ B I
j ll
i
t ' ' ' - t
t
1164
I' l.'.' ~ f ": ' f
I i 11 = j
r ; r ~
01 .. ; l f n
I ~ f
n " f ~ q i
i >
j ., J i ' i j i
n
a~~ q;.; i ~ If
ii ~ili L f > I ~ f
g • ~ " ! • ~ ~ J
i
II It'
I
owu ' ;~~··~~ { 8
B
I >--- Ii: ~ 0 . H
I i i ~ ;;: II
i
t I , I
j ..
0 0 , ~ s
ii ~~B ~ s.; I!!
i
i~ f
s fl£ ' • tJ: g ~"
1i
i ; ; • • 8,; t!,•
t: ,. "".
0 0
I: C ! j -~
if '''P ! l
i [ i = J. f !
i.: h· p
i ! f
I ! 1 t " • ' ii'.,~!
J
i
Zn ; ;
3 l ~ • ! > !t
J
i
C f ~
6 ll, .. &' i
i f ! j f
UIP df > I ~~ . ~ fji
i : f
f
j C
a
ti -~ II'
I
in ~~ 00 ~~ B
o , l 0 I ; . ~. ~
f.
li! ~ C! ....
0 • • :: RH ~ •
1 ! i ,;
8'
Ii l I , i
I ,![
0 ' ,; 0 s r ~
l ~
Ii'
ill 8111
l ~ B
i p
i I ..
t ~ .. ii; 8 ~ I '"
H i
I e' ' ; ; .:.:
jl
et:
0 • ~
0 ~~
1165
P' Hi'
l
f
i I g· i
J . f
Si! li]
i n
JI I l
a
r r ! > f >i I
i" j .., i ~ J i
n
i! in J ~ ! r
3 f ..
g ~ l
Ii :! ; l P n· ! Id
t
a f
s
li I!'
B
d'
l ,,
n I ~
E ' a: .. ': 0
0 "'
4 ~ ~ i --~ ~ !
i . ~. i, ( I f§
t ~ - i : f ! "
A I ~
z
I1 , i
ls>
t !
f
O
1 ~ l A
i ~ ~
B !~ i I o =-
i ' ~ ' • ~ ~ - I
r
I ~
0' H ;
j; f
0 0.;
lii~
vrn a l
i
l r
t
j
1 f
jJm; J i
i n
tJk• i
f I > f -i !
i • f ! l, i f
i
r ! ~ f d ~ i ,. f "" i I • I" . ~ ~ 1 • .: i !
d ... ~ i :., ~ , i
g i if • • i ~ a i
I ! ~ ~ -
i . n
i
i
i
f.

I
s ~~~~ ~
00 B
I
C . ~ . ·~~
r '!.
8H ! i
f
l s " , g
it i t I =· i ~
i:o r.i J ~·
l
1 i
a l .. i .

BB
6;
SM =· •
0 i • ~ • • ~ 8 =· !
f l ~ I I ; ~ .. ; ; ~:::;
f
g . H .. " 0 ~.
1166

APPENDIX B
co voe: NO• so, ..... Pllu
CY
Bt Hkdown Summ• ry ( tonl) , ..... , ( tone l ( tgnsl ( 10111) 11oai1 FEMA Flood Zone Maps
Lenn.a•~h'eerodoes 15' 57 19 69 137 18 C OC .,. ... O!
L'.c·o• 0,; a,:: i ~ r.-, .a; "' 0! 3 t: , .. '" ' Oi = 06 c, c1lM o~a;J : n-, c 80-1 '" IS 2~ ... 763 •]: i C!
un La! ru '~ OtflfMrc1a• 1 3 2 0" 3' 0 0,. 2611 "' c,
Ban,, """1 SJ!. - en Ceriter 6 29 · us ' 3 7, 4 • '- i ... • co C7 Consl, vcUon Totals 177 .59 23.Jl 1I0. 21 - 4 , U 51.52 ,. 1, co voe "°· so, PM1• PMu
1ons) fton1I .... , ttontl ( lonl) 1ton11
FY Summar"¥
lfv::,5 171 lO 22 1a 166 54 3•; • 505 775
Totals. 177.59 23. J] 1&0.21 4.65 51 .52 1.76
1\-' I
1167
IP Ir~ ~ I·~ li!ll¥Jit'l0 Jo [ ...... I f "' .
i
II ..
i :. ... ·.
i ~ •
G
r.. 1-. 11it, • • I ,· 1
i
4 .. .,,
Npm11nioTIT I (
I ! f [
i r ~ i
f l ~""'"" .. ,.,
T
I
r ,
I
t
s.....,• t•~•
I
r .~ ...
t"~ !! I
i ~
l ·, • ~ E
f , .....
u. ;
I
I"
i .,
11,""" 1 •
t'
r
i • l ' ; ~ • • ~
e."-, I
i II .. $ N

1. o""'"'""""'"
f e ~ ,
j ~ ~ 1;. r1111: l1
I
l
i ~ • •
f •
00 ~ I
I . ~ . 1 r
i ~
e
l l'
f ! /
f = " ~ i ~
l
1 ., .. , ...
t
l
t ~--·, ,.

L_ _____ L_
1168
n , .....

C ( f.

II ;
I
n .,, ~•
C ... ~:~
1169
I,
I ,,
J ... .. Ha :

I -!
t
I
I
I
I
f :,
2'
I ~ ! f. ! •
i ;1 ~ .• .
i & •
tr1-
i -
I
5 I
f
I
I
1 1170

APPENDIX C
Cultural Resources Survey Report
IDENTIFICATION ANO EVALUATIO::--1 OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES

BANNING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION

AND RECYCLED WATER SYSTEM
City of Banning
Riverside County, California
For Submitlal to:

City of Banmng
Watt'r /Wa,t!'wdlt!r Ulilitie-; Department
176 F. Lincoln Street
Banning, CA 92220
Prepared for:

Rosemarie Crisologo
1-'arson! t Water and lnfra~ tructure, Inc.
100 W. Walnut Street, Suite B4
l'asaden3, CA 92.324
Prepared by :

CRMTECH
1016 E. Coult' y Dri ve, Suite& A-B
Colton. CA 92501
Bai " fom" Iang. Principal Investigator
Michael Hogan, Principal Jnvestig3tor
July 20, 2007
CRM J'l:CH Contract l\o. 2083
1171
NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATABASE INl·OltMATION
Aulhor(s): Bai " Tom" Tang. Principal Investigator / Historian Josh Smallwood, Ai-chaeologist/ Report Writer
1elbsa Hernandez. Archaeologist / Native American Liaison Consulting Firm: CR.iVI f !::CH
1016 E. Cool<'y Drive, Suites A-B
Colton, CA 92324
909) 824-6400
Dale: July 20, 2007
Title: ldet1tification and Evaluation of Historic Properties: Wastewater Trealrm>nt Plant Fxpansion and Recycled Water Syslem, City of Banning, Riverside County , California
For Submittal to: City of Banning
Watcr /Waslcwaler Utilities Department
176 E. Lincoln Slrccl
Banning, CA 92220
95 )) 849-3273
Prepared for. RO!oemaric Crisologo
Parsons Waler and Infrastructure Inc.
100 IV. Walnut Street, Suite 84
Pas..1dena, CA 91124
626) 440-6048
USCS Quadrangle: Beaumont and Cabazon, Calif., 7.5' quadrangle, (various sections of T3S RlE , San Bernardino Base Meridian)
Project Size: Approximately 16 acres and 28,500 linear f.,.,, Keywords: City of Bann.ing, Riverside County; hi&turical / archaeological resources survey; Site 33-16207 (rural historical landscape); Site 33- 16208 /CA-RJV-8364 (early 20th Ct'ntury rduS<, d eposi l); lesting recommended at Site 33-16208

MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
In June and July 2007, t.R.\1-l J Elli ~ rformcd i1 "- uhural rf'-.our C',.,.._ ' iludy nn the Area of Putcntial Llf~h (AP[) ol a proposed wa~tc,,•.uc-1 lfC"Jtmc-nt pl~1n1 ex-pan.-..iun anJ recyc: leJ wdlt.: f' di~tribu11on ystern m the C1 Ly of kanning, R1vN ... 1dr County. Laliforma rhe und~rhll-.1n g mvolv~ thf" con~lnJc-t1011 o f add1t10na l wao; te\- vater treatme nt tdcilities on a 16-ilcrc trart of undeveloped land and approx1matcly 28.500 linear fet?t of watt?r con"' eyano..' p1JX'11nr~. lhr- J\PE he-. to the ~ uth of the titv ·~ downto-., n ar~a. in Sections 7-10, 1-1, 1c;, and 18 of T3S RJE. San Bernardino BclSC \ 11 erid1.1n.

The study 1s .: i parl of the- e n,,ronmental revi ew proce.S!l fol' the proposed undrrtakmg.. a s required by rhe City of Banning in comphance w1 1h Settion 106 of th~ Ndtional Historic Ptl';'SC rvation Act and the Californ ia Lnv ironmenla l Qualil\ Acl ( CFQA).

The purp.lc..t.• of the ~ tudy is tu pruviJe the C ity of Banning with th" rn .. ~CP.-...-.ary information and anal y-.i'i to determint- wheth~ r the propo~ ed undrrtJkmg wou ld hJ vt> any t! ffet. h on histont-c1 l /a rcharologll"'- al r«:-c;ourcC'< ii that may C'l(l"'i.t m or ne. Jr th~ Al'E, a'> ntrtrtdd ted by Scctton 106 and CEQA. In order lo accomphsh the ob1ective ot the study . CRM T[ CH cno ducled a hi sto ri ca l / archaeological re!)( . .mrr~~ ft'\.Ortb ~ Jrch, purc. uf'd h1 c::toncal b.1ckgro und Tl'"St:',Hth, con ta cted Nat ive Amt:1rican r~prcst.:" nt~iti-..c.•s, llnct tar.-1Ct..i out.:, ,;; yslrmahc He ld .sLir,·ev.

As a re~u lt ut t~ re~ an. h prrn:~<lu~, l',.,·o p! C\ 10usl}' unrC" cotdcd h1,tork -pcriod si te..,, 33- 16~07 ind 33- 16208 ( CJ\-RJV -831>4), w~rc ,d~nllficd within the APE. ~ ite 33- 16207 LUlloi >ls of a group or n1ral historic land-, cilpc ff'ature,;, of unknown age , ,uch a.-, olivt> tr~~. a ft'nc~. drtt.l remna nts of Ml irrigaticm ~ y.s tem Althllugh the ~ ite i~ Jvc.::1ted on l,1nd one{" ownC" d by \- V.:ilter Hathaway , a prominent lun,I m~rd1ttnt t1round l~ tur n of thi...• 20th (' f"ntury and the fir st ma yor ot BanninK, th~re is no c \, dcn~ 1h,1 t the~ f<'.aturM arc cloq- ly as~ ciated with Hathaway an<l th~ pro minent role he played in the e aTI}' hi story of ~, nnin~ our tlo they demonstrale a ny olhC'r notable historicaJ / archaeological merit! t. Jn fact. hbtoric. tl1 suuwes ~ ugg~ t lh'1t at lc,1s1 c;onw of the lcaturc,;; likely post- date H,11haway' s a s,;; 0(' 1.1t1011 wit h the property. Therefore, Site 33- 16207 doe:!:I> not dppear to qualify ac:: J " hi ~toric proprrty,"' .:i ,;; def med by Section 106, or a· his to rical resource :· a~ defint" d by LCQA
Sire 33- 162.08 i~ <1 refu~ Jcpo3it c..on ta1n in g .:nl ahunJ;. inn· of tempora lly and morphologically Jiilgno~ tu:- consuinrr \ lr•m(,, from 1hr l92fk -191fk. whH~h m .. 1y pto\ lide \' a] uab le information on the cono; um er practices of local househo ld -, .Jt tht?- time. There mav be a sub!) urfaC'E' co mpone nt to the it~, d=> it was ob~ n·t" J tha t mJn\' of th~ Jrtlfdd~ tuund on the surta~ ~, t<rt' pilrt ly buried . Whiklhr- l1.J'20c.-·11;,10c; may nof b4-- ron~1dC"rr-d a parllru1. ir1y r.1rly pt ... nod m local lw;tnr v, 1t wa~ a time of acce lerated growth and dTamaitic change in BanninA and the entire United ~ tates l o dt.1te, vt.>ry few im1l..1r ~ih.:·~. with a good Jn,d of inte,-; rit ) .. n1d t1 ,· t1ri~t)· uf houSol.·hold co1h un'lc r ri..."'fu~ itc- rn s d,, ting to the early 20th cPnturv$ hi.lVi" bet?·n rPco rd,-..d m thf" C11v of Banmng.

R~~·d on 1h.-·"'4.:· t..unsid~rati111,~. Si le- 3)- 16208 may han· ! ht pOtf•ntir1l to yu: ld 11nporlilnl archaeolog1eal data for the study of local Ju..,tory wit h regard tn con,;,umen"> m and the lif~tvle of C,1rly-20th century dKricuhu ralh, t.s in thi:, portion OJ inlam.l !).Qu lht'rn Californ ia, but thi:tl potentic1I cannot be ascertained without further archaeological investigation . ln order to determine- the 1gm fic-,1nce of th1"' •• a tf' and 1t ,;;_ qua hhcatinn a ,i; a '' h1"' tonc property"/" hi~toncal reo-.ource,· C RM TECH recommend!\ that an archaeological te ... ting and evalua tion program be implem~ ntt>d on the s, tr. Furlhrr rrmmmrndations reg. irding the f,nal lrtWm~ nt of ! he site will br formulalcd and pre~ nted on the basl ... of the re'iult!') of the te-. hng and e,· alua tion program No furthN ru ltur,11 rrsourCC' s tn\' rs t1 gatton 1~ rf"comm1."' ndl"'d for tlw balan('(' of thf" APF 11nle--. s proj~ct pJan..., unJergo i-.uch c~ nge-- i .i-, to indudt! , u ~a'> not 1..ovt!ret.f bv this ~ tudv. flowevt: 1r, i( buried cultur,, I materiJh, are encountt! rl:'d dunng ron~tn1dion dnywhcre within the APE , alJ work. m that arr-a should be halh.'d or ch vC"T tf•d un til .1 qu,1hfwd arc h.1rolog1c; t ('",1n l't•aluatc- thC> n.itu n• ,1n d i,ig11i fitct111.~ uf the fin1.li,
1172

TABLE OF CONTENTS
MANAC.F.'v!E'-'T SLvfMARY
INTRODUCTlO:--: ......... . ........................................................................................... I AREA OF POTE!\ flAL EFl-r.CIS ............................................................................................... 3 SEITL\JG ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Current Natur
Cultural :::.etti1
Ethnohist
Historic

RESEARCH
3 4
4 5
7 Rf'CTlrd « SE>arrh ..... . ..................................................... 7 Ili ~turic~IB,id,ground Rl~~ rch .

N ati vt:' An1eri G111 Participc1tion
field Survey ........................ .

Kr.SUL I'S A:'-LJ HI\LJINGS ................................................ . l{ecords !,.,arch
N ative ,-\ meri cilll Participation
Field Survey ............................... .
7 7
7 8
X
H
16 Historical Background Researd1 .. ·••••••••••··••·••••·••• ..••• 17 DISCL:SSJON .....

Defirntion .............................................................................................................................. 19 Site E\aluallon ........ ............ .......... . ...................................................................... 2 1 Site 33- 16207 ................................................................................................................... 21 Site 33-16208 (CA-RlV-8364)....... . ............................................................................... 21 COJ\:CLUSIO1' AND RECOMMENDA f!ONS ........................................................................ 22.

RffERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 24 APPENDIX1: rerSQnnel Qualifications ........................................................................ . ........ 26 APPENDIX 2: Correspondence with Native Americ.m J<eprcscntativl'S .............................. 31 APPCNDIX3: Site Records... . .......................................................................................... 39

LIST OF FI GURES
Figure 1. Pro1ect \' icimty
figure 2. Art'a of Potential Efft'Cts
figure 1. Ovf'rview nf thi.> current natural setting ot the APE .......................... .

Figure 4a . Prt.>\'iou ~ cultural resources surveys in the vicinity of the AP[ (1) ..

Figun, 4b. Pr~viom, rnltural resource,, surveys m the vicinity of the APE (2) .. .

Figure ~. The APE and vicinity in 1832-1856 ....................................................... .

Figure 6. fhe J\Pl:: ,1nd vicinity in 1897-1898 .............................................. .

Figure 7. The APf ,,nrl vicinily in 1939-1941
Figure/!. lh<'AI'~ anrl vicinity in 1949-1951

LIST OF TABLES
TJble 1. Ol'scriptiun uf th,• Undertaking ....................... ..

I ahle 2. l'reviou,lv Kecorded Cultural Resources in the Vicinity ...

II
1 2
4 9
10 18
19 3
11 11' TRODUCTI ON
Jn June and July 2007, CRM ITCH performed a rnltur.11 , .. source, , tudy on the Arc•a of Potential Effects (APE) of a propo<;<;d wastewater trc.1tment plant P,pansion and recyckd waler distribution system in th" City of Banning, Rivcr;idl' County, Cal,fnrnia (Fig. I). ·1he undertaking involves the com, truction of addition. al ,,, astc, 1\•a tl'r tn:.•atmen t facilities on a 16- 1c re trac l of undeveloped land and approximately 28, 500 linear ft..~t uf wc: 1 ter conve yance pipelines. The APE lies lo the south of the city ·s downtown area, in S,,ctiuns 7-10. l •I, 15, and 1Rof T3S RIE, San l:lernardino Base Merididn (Fig . 2). !' he study i ; a part of the environmental review process for the proposed undertaking as required by th .. City of Banning in compliance with Section 106 of the \ Jational Historic Preservation Act and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQ,\).

Cl{]\,( 1 ECH performed th" current study lo provide the City of Banning with lhe necessary information and analysi, tu determine whether the propus.,d undertaking would have anv effects on historical /archaeolo>;ical n,sources that may exist in or ne.ir the AP[, as mandated by Section 106 and CFQA. In order to accomplish the objectiw of the ~tudy, CRJvl TECH conducted a historic-al / archaeological resources record ~ s,·arc·h, pursued hi<lorical background research on the APF. contacleJ rep1l'SCntalivcs of local "-:ativp American groups, and mrricd out a systematic field sun ey . The following report is a complete account of the methods and results of the various avenues of research, and the in~l conclusion ol the study .
y -
J,.

1. .,..1._ ... ~--==--
SCALE 1 ·250 000
L
10mllN ~.,.
t~ I !. -;.. -, .... 1
1Jt, OJ~~ -• CS':. 1 -. • •
j
I _- l..
f •
I
Ill
le, , ..

I --~~·
1 l
t ... --J.
c::~_~r ~
I
I ... '°"
J' • I
Aftf ' ..., 11.r<~
J• ·.. "''"'" .. ~ ., J •,r.:.,..--.,
I ,.,, ,.,
I ('/, ;,. T
U. A -.. ,_ ~~ c
J-ig ore 1. l'roject \' 10 111ly ( l\.."'15il' d Ofl USCS S.1i n &,. rnard1n1 1and ' irml. i An. i, Lal it _ I .25000!. l qu a dr, rnglc~ 1u~r.s 1% 9 : 19791)
1173
l\t"" -·-:>
Ir; -.~~~~~-· 1'!
t\~
T"
4~~~;:~:~~~>; t·~~-:;''·" ..... . _ __.

I, i ~-....... , _. __ ,) .• • l<. ~ .. -
1'" r --~ .. -----.-.--"""'.:;"' •--. ... , • -. I : • [ ·~ 0 5 • -----·-----•

1..:,\
r~: .. • ,.,
r
1 l •
ci---..;:;.,_
i_iij~ .,·
11, ·~ -~-.:;., ,.._.

I
J'· i -,
t-- 11-:---.--.... ,_.__:"', ,-• D• D-:i:.o ··•,:;,.,;·· ·;---- 1 · t .... ...~ ll(! H1¥ Af' Q .. - f
Jr-~~ ;·:.·---.... ,, ... ~~-:-_~ l, -~--~-·j~ -!_ .. 1I V-· l- ll 1 --, , •"":' •-
t' . q_b I i -"'.: .... ~ .. --\ L l ; -! .]
fu - l A.e,•"" 1sllul 1a",. n....,,._USCi,.__-. 1..,• c... ........ c ,w. 11~,.....,-.,. ll.5Cl 1..._,,-.. o AREA OF POTl:.NllAL EHECTS
Accordmg to 36 Cf-R 800.2(d), the Arca of Potl'ntial Eff<'cts , s " the geographic arC'a or .ir~as wilhin which an undertaking may directly or indirectly cau-e alterations in the charactN or use ol hi~toric propl'rti.,,, if any such properties exist." Fur the current undertaking, the APE consists of a 16-acre ITar-1 of undeveloped land designated for the expansion of the Banning Wa~tcwater Treatment Plant (W\.VTP) and approximately 28,500 linear feet of pipel ine rights-of-way, which measure-, appro~imalely five feet in width. Table 1 provides further description of the various components of lhe undertaking and th,eir locations ( d .

Fig. 2).

I Proi•ct
mponcnl
a, h .. ,., • ... i h:r
treatment
planl
xpan:-.ion
l' ip..."'-l ine lo
II RI
Kccyded
Wdh· r
p1pe-hne
T.1bl" l . Drsnipti~ n of the Underlaking
O~scriplion
C01lsl1-Uel10ll-Of add11Jonal ,-.·a ~l~wal,·T trt>,1trne r1l ii1Cilll1c-. Or\ iln aj>prox,m~,tt-ly lb-arn.• h·(11 I of undP\' t>iopnl l;md IN Jtcd lo lhl' Wl' S I of the exi '5 hng Dannm g \\ IWTr and •, uulh ol Ch.ulec; Street
Retrofitting the ex1,;; tmg W1? 1l Rl h.K"ilt1.·J to tlw f' J .. I 01 the W\\' l" I' and- ir,stallmg Jppro>. imafcl)· 3, 500 lioe. lf feet of pipeline from W"' II RI I() the.-\\'\¥ 1 f' e1t1; nsion : i.H~ In~taJl.-.tion of approximi,te-lv 25,°'10 lint"ar h'i't uf n.." C'" yclcd wawr pipeline ginning at th1.~ i,lirtK WWTP, h-bl along Charles Slrttt, north along 1lathawav Sin-cl, Wt--SI along Lincoln Street. south along <; un~ t A \.r nm>. w1>.:.t along an unpa ...- ed Cuy accu. s road ( an e• tm.., ion of Y,,.'~ tw • .rd AH-nue). loa poml o( connection nt tht> c;,,m 1.akt·.._ huu,ing de .. elopmt=nl

SETTING
CURRENT NATUllAL SETTING
rhc Citv of ljanning is situall'CI ju~t w~I of 1h., San Gorgonio Pass, and near the southern foothills of lhc San Jacinto and S.,n Bernardino Mountains. The San Gorgonio Pass, an easl - wesl trending corridor between the twu mounlain ranges, is an important connection bct,,• ccn southern Cil lifo rni a ·~ coa~ titl re-gicms and the v~s t Co lora do Desert, , vith Int ers tat e ID serving as the main tran~porlation rou te through th.- pa.ss. The APE is located lo lhc outh of lntt•r,t,,11, 10 anu e.iends t>ast-west across bolh undeveloped and developed areas in the southern portion of the ~• nninKcity limits. Elevdtions along the proj_ect roule range bt,t,H't'n approx1matdy 2,080 tiet'I to 2.500 feel above mean sea level. Descnpllons of each portion of thi, APE ilre presented bt,Jow.

Recycled waler pipeline: \ 10s1 of the APE lies ~long the route ofthe propo<;ed recycled Willer pipeline, and much of the pipeline route is situated within 1he existing rights-ofY of various public roads. 1he route pa""' 5 through residential, commercial, and light industrial use zones found along Sunset /\ venue ,md Lincoln, Hathilway. and Charles Sireels (Fig . 3). The western end of the pipeline route follows an existing gravel -topped access road across undeveloped land lo the Sun Lakes housing de, elopment (Fig . 3}. This portion of the APE is a utility corridor thal has been graded smuoth along most of its course, and used for both iibove- and below -ground utilitie,, including a pelrokun1 pipeline, a fiber op ti c cable, ~ ewc-• r, il nd a power tran~m1-.. ... i(ln line.
3 1174
II.inning WWTP expansion : Thi' 16-,Kn· tr,,,t propos<.'d for the, ,·> p:m,.ion uf lh<' Banning \\ WI Pi~ undc,\'c,lop<•d and rt•latiH•ly 1,·,· d (l'ig. 3). /\ paved road traverses m?,tr ir,.. ,\1• ster 11 bound:- try . and ~ e rvc- s dS thl· drivl' way tu thL· Bc1nning Animc1l Shelter located to the south of the existing WW1 P. The 16-acre tract is a portion of Assessor"s Parcel No. 532-180-038. Vegetation on the property appear, to be controlled by periodic grubbing or mowing, as most of the surface is bare (Fig.)). A row of olivP lrf>f'S and rnncrPle standp,pes line a fenc-e along tht> westPm edgt' of thl' property.

Pipelin" lo Well Rl : \Ve il Rt is located at the edstern end of th.- APE and b acces:,ed through ,m ext.-nsion of Chari"& Street from the existing Banning \,\fWTP. The wt,stt'rnmost 600 feet of the propo,,cd pipeline route is along paved road. while the balance is along a dirt ~ervice road that leads to the well (Fig. 3).

CULTURAL SETTING
Ethnohistoric Context
The San Gorgoniu Pa:-.~ area h .. , s lun g been a mcljor cn)',,~ing ., nd in krsecling poinl for N.:ih\: t::' American tribe,; m the ~u rrounding regio no:.. It io; g,•m_•r;1lly cun!, idl'rl-.d to lx- the Irgm~ J Ove- rnew of the curre-nl natural sethn,r. of the J\PE. Ciod1Ltsc: frn111 ur•,_.,. h•tf: "'it•\,· "" a~l akmg Llllco) n Stre-et, \ 1ew wesl along utility cumdor, \-> eh , ou thea.-. l Jt n,..,., thr [ 6--,, rn• lu l h ,l\\ cud l"""l"lmg W\\' TP iadhty; view l'a" I along dirt aC"C"t>'-.' i ro., d In \ Vr• l1 Rl. { Photus la ken on Jt1h E, ; md 9. 2007} 4 traditional territory oJ the Pass C<1huilla Indians, but was probably visited and used by membPrs of the Serrano lndi,1ns as well. ·1he Pa,, Cahuilla are one of the three l•b~roups- as Jpfined by modem anthropologisL..,_.,f the C"ahuilla, who have occu pied the central portion of what i, riow Riverside County fur many centuries. The homl'land of the Serrano is centert'd al th.: San Bernardino Mountains. but "'so indudes the southt'm rim of the Mojave Dt'st'rt, extending lrom today·, Victorville eastward to Twentynint, Palms, and may includP aredS JS far south as the present-day March Air Reserve Base.

Modem anthropological literaturt' sug);P:,ts that the Cahuilla and Serrano societies were similar in many respects. Both groups were primarily gatherers and hunters, and ocu,sionJl fishers. Both were organiz,-d bv linedges and cl.ans th,1t were affiliated with one of two exogamous moieties. Tl1l'"" different lineages, clans, and moietil's inlt,racted with the others through trade, ceremonies and intl'fmarriage.

Although n,ntdrt with Europeans may have occurred a, early as 1771 or 1772, Spanish influen_.. 1, n th .. Cahuilla and Serrano societies was nei,;ligible until the 1600s. Beginning in the <'arly 19th Ct'nhiry, tlw increased Spanish-and l,1ter Euroamt"rican-presence and activ" ir,\'c,lwm~,11 in the area brought significant impacts to Indian populations and their lifewars , In p;ortic,olJr, thP nahve population was decim<1kd during the 19th century as a resultof the expostirt' to Furopean diseases, most notably smallpox, for whid, the Native peoples had no immunity. To..l<1y, the nearest !'\ alive American group to the project location is the Morongo Band of Mission lmli.,ns, which includes members of both Cahuilla and Serrano descent.

Historic Context
Dating back lo a11eit'nt time,. the San Gorgon,o Pass area was always known a, the nexus for cross-desert tra\'cb. Mu;t notabk· ,,moug early roads through the p,1ss was tht' Cocon1a1icopil Jrail , a :'\ JiltiVL' Amt' ric:an tr.u..Iing route connecling coastal southern Calilornia lo areas along the Colorado Rin:r. In 1862, the Cocomaricopa Trail was discovered' hv William David flradsh,",, ,,nd became known as the Bradshaw frail. For the next dernd~ and a half, it st:rn•d a, the m~in thoroughfare between the Los Angeles area and gold mines near pre,.,,nt-tlav F.hr .. nbt'rg, Arizona, until the completion of the Southern Pacilic Railwav in 1876-1877 broughl an end toils heyday.

During much of the Spanish and Mexican p<'riods in C Jlifornid hi5tory. the project vicinity was generally considered ,1 part of Rant·hu San Gur!(Onio, the most remote of the 24 principal calll<' ranches undn the control of Mission San Gabriel (Gunlher J98-1 :458).

Around 18-15, after secularization of tlw mission systt'm, Powrll "Paulino" We.lver and Isaac " Julian" Williams petition"1:I the \ 1exi,.,n authoritie, for a lunJ granl of the 48,400-acre rancho, which strtetchcd from Yucaipa to the ea,tPrn edy," of tht' San Gorgc,01io Pass 5'-'cmity First Nntional Bank of Los Angelf>s 1955; Ey<'"r 1984:4). Although the grant was nc\'er issued, \\' caver and Williarn5 took possession of the land under assumed ownership Guntl1cr I91H:-159).

Within the present-day Citv of Banning. tht• earl iest non-:">Jatiw settleme11ts "' ere the adobe houses built by Isaac W. Smitl1 and Jose !' ope in 1854, after both had .,...cur .. d pJrtial interests in Rancho S.1.n Gorgonio (E)'er 1984:5; J,mnings .. t al. 199?,:46-47). Pope's house, al what is now lhe Gilman Ranch, served as a stage station on the Rrndshaw Trail nndn thP 5 1175
lat,• r uwnc• rs of th,· prop~• i)', Newlcm Noble and James M. Gi lman ( jennrngs el al. 1993: 46). mi th', ranch, also knuwn lo have been a stage slop, la ter became the site of the I l,ghland prings Resort ( 1b1d . A7).

The railroad rame through 111 1~7fi, as rnen 1, onl' d above, facilitating popul< 1tion growth and the need for serv, cPs and amenities. Al th<: time, B, mning was called Moore City, after the town ' s princip, 1I ldndowner, Ran:, um B. Moore ( l'res,- Enterp1is, 1968; Gunther 1984: 40).

The area w,1s ren; im., d afkr Phjneas Banrung, a Los Angeles- based freight wagon operator and San Gorgonio Pass iliea sheep rancher around 1877 and a lownsile was officially established in 1884 ( Gunther 198- 1:41).

F.vt'n with m, nw, ed dewlopment, land owncrshjp was tenuous. Railroad land grants i~Ut, d lo th<' South<> rn Pacific and the crNlion of the l'ortrero Indian Reservation left the an' a a d1<' Cl- C'fboard of claims by the railroad, Native Americans, and eddy settler;. The m,, tlt•r was finally resolve- cl with federal approval in 1891. Indian land was consol, dah, d as the Morongo J< es< ervalion, the railroads received an east- west swath , and displacc- d settler, were retitled with other parcels ( Hughes 1938: 29).

Construction in town near the turn of the century includi, d the Bryan t Huus<' in 1885, later called the ~ an Gorgoruo Inn ([) er 1984: 1'.l), am.I St. Bonifaa, Indian School, built in 1889 on 80 acres purchas...' CI by the Bureau of Catholic Indian Missions ( Hugh,,,. ] 038· 6). ln 1911, two years betore the dly' s incorporation. the Banning Sanitarium OJ> l'n<'Cl, marking the beginning of the city' s efforts lo market the hed) th bendits uf the region' s dry climate. 11, e campaign extended " ell into th .. J'l-105 with claims that " the nation' s best physicians annually send scores of people ht" n, to II"' relief from asthma, bronch. ial and lung trouble while] others have learned uf lhP health advantages and charm of Banning through le tters from people -... ho have mowd ht>re" ( Ranrrini; Chamber of Commerce 1948; Eyer 198- 1:13).

I he 1-. letropolilan Waler District provided a co ,~ siderab le economic and population boost when. in 1930, it cl10se Banning lo set up headquarters fo r the tunnt" lini; operations through the San Jacinto Mountains , a part of the massive Cul or ado River Aqueduct project.

Growth in the cilv slow<. xl considerably during Wor ld War 11, hut rebl> und,~ l afll' rward . n the meanlime 1 more and more resort d11< l touri::, t traffic found it~ way to the Paln1 Springs . UN, fur ther lo the east. Coupled" , th the comple h L•n of thl' Stak Highway 60 bypass in 196~ 8,1n.rting underwent significant chang~ ln it~ e- conomic base and population makeup, with a large increase in " unski lled lnbor, mostly minorities," residents who could find work in hotel, and rPsorts of the P. tlm Spring, area, but could nol afford lo live there ( J' r, s,- Eiltrrpri~ 1977). 11, e city, like nearby Beaumon t, also supported a large retirement communi ty (ibid.).
llanning' s economy today is la.,; dy 11,: ar.- d tu travelers on Interstate 10, with many residents finding employm<: nt in retail and other consumer services. 1\ llhough considerably expanded, the city' s commercial centt" r renltl. ins the san, e as jn the 1920s, along the blocks ruruung east- west on Ramsey St reel ( City of Ranning I <l78 :4). To a large exlenl, ii is a reflecl. Jon of the community' s strong dcsin• to preserve its traditional town center and prevent the tale that befell numerous other downtown commercial districts throughoul the C. S . during the era of rapid urban c,xpansion and suburbanization in the decades immediately following World War ll.
6 RESE AR CH M ETHOD S

R ECO R D S S EA RC H
On ) um· l 1, 2007, CRM TECH archac' Cllogis t 1' ina Gallardo ( see App. I for qualifica ti ons) cumplett' d the record,; search al the £:.. istem Info rma tion Cen ter ( EiC), loca ted ,, t the University of Califnrnia, Riverside. During the rt'CQrd, search , Gallardo examined maps and record, on f, le at the EiC for previously idPnlifi.- d cultura l resources within or near th e APE, and existing ru ltural resources repor ts pe rt aining to the project vicin jty . l'reviously identified cultural resoun"" include properties designa ted as Ca li fornia H isto rical Landmarks, Points uf lfo, torica l [nterest, or Rivcr~ ide County 1_..,ndmarl- s, as well as th ose Iisled in the National Register of Ilisto ric Places, the California Register of H is torical R,e<; 0urces, or the California Hbtorkal R""° urct' Information Svstem. The rt!Sul15 of the records search are presented bdow. •

HISTO RI CAL BA C KGRO UN D R ESEA RCI I
T<'rn )< 1cquema, n, Clt-' vl · 1ECH ltis turian (,,.. e App. I fnr qualificat ions), conduct,, d th e hi, toritJ! bad. ground research on the basis uf publ ished li terature in loca l his tory, ar~ hivJI rernrJs <• f the County of Riverside, and his toric maps tif the Banning area. Among maps . ronwltl.-' d tor this study were the US. Leneral I ,md Offic .. ·s ( GLO) la nd survey pla t maps date- cl l8'>6- 1880, and the U.S. Geo logical Survcy" s ( USGS) topographic maps da ted 190 1- 1956. 1 h,.,;e mdps are co ll ected al the ~ cience Library of the llnivt' rsity nf California, J{ iverside, anJ the Ca lifornia Desert Di, t:ricl of the U.S. lforeau of I and ' vlanagemen l, loca tl"<l in Mo reno Va lley.

NAT IV ~ AME RI CAN P A RT IC IP ATIO N
As part of the ,.., search proa,,_ lures, CRM TECH con tacted the Stale of Ca lifornia' s NJtive American H .. ritage Cnmm, ssion on June LI, 2007, lo req uest a record, search in thP cummi s ,ion 's sacred lands file. following the commission ' s recommenda tion'<, CR'\ 1 TECH furthf' r contacted e i!lh t \ Jative Amencan represenlali, es in the region in wri tint, 011 June 11 to ~ nlirit ){)('al Native American input regarding any pm.bible cu lh1rt1 I rt'SOurct"-.. cnncern. i;; o, w thf:' proposed project. The mrrespondences behvecn CR. 1\1 · 1ECH and tht.' N,1tivt' Amt• ri«m rl'prescnt. itives a re attached lo this reporl in Appendix 2.

FI ELD SUR VEY
On July 6 and 9, 2007, CRM TECI l a rchaeo logis ts Josh Smallwood and Nina Gallardo ( see App. I for qoal ifirations) carri,. d out the field survey of the APE. Smallwood and Gallardo conductt' d an intensive- level, on- fool mspt" etion of the W\ 1\/TP expan, ion site by wa lking pi1Iallel tr«t1"'-' CIS spaced 15 meters ( approx. ' i() f,.el) apart. T he pipeline route lo Lhe existin~ Wd l RI and the westt- rn portion of tht' recyclE'< l water pipeline route, which travers<." across und.- vdopt:' d lJnd, "" re .ilso sur\' eyed at an in tensive leYel. The survey of these two . ir<>~S nwe r .. d a maximum width uf 30 nl~ lers ( approx. 90 feel), 15 mete rs on each idf' of lht' cPlllt' rlin,. of the aca, ss roads.

Tht• rt' maind.- r of the A PF., lying wi thrn the rif1hls- o(- way of paved streets, was surveyed al a reconnaissann:- t.,w l mainly by driving Jlong the project ro ut e. In this way, the entire 7 1176
APJ:. , vas examined sys lcn1: ili cat ly for any evlt.icncc of humc1n d1..tivifo:~ Uatin~ tu tht! prehistoric or historic periods (i.e., 50 years <1gu or uld.,r). Visibility of the native ground urf.,cc r,,ni;ed between poor (0-20"/,) Jlon); paved or gravel roads and excellent (80-100'7,,) in n ,n ,ntly graded, grubbed, or mowed areas.

RESUL TS AND FINDLNGS

RECORDS SEARCH
According to record, on file at the [ IC, portions of the APF had been previou,ly ,urvcyed for cultural resources (Figs. 4a , •lb), and two historic-period sites, CA -RIV-75-MH and 33· 13778, wPre 1dentifit'd pdrflally acros, the APE. The boundaries of Site CA -R1V -7544H covers a large area, nP.<rly one mile long dfld a half-mile wide, encompaS5ing a total of 34 eru;iun t'(Jntrul ,m<l w.iter tdtthment feature, The,c teatures were located along drainages ind eru,iun d1,1nneb, an<l probably served tu divert and catch rainwater and pre\' ent erosion of the pasturclands (Mc,, ick and Dice200-1) Site 33-13778 was recorded as a large farm /rnnching cumplt'>. comprising five structural foundations and three e'<i,hng buildings that may have, onre been part of an early 20th century ranch (Tamgu, hi and Oire 2004).

During a 2004 study, both o( these sites were evaluated against the criteri,1 for lbting in the Nalional Register oJ Historic Places and Lhe Cal,forn,a Register of Tlistorical Resources, as established under the provisions of Section 106 .rnd CEQA. Both W4're found not lo Ix, eligible as Lhey failed to meet any of the criteria, and for the lack of hi"turic inlC'grity Taniguchi and Dice 200-t:l-3; \1es.sick and Dice 2004:2-4).

Within a one-mile radius of the APE, as many as 19 rultural resources studic,s have been carried out on various parcels of land Jnd l,,;ear feature" (Fig,. 4a, 4b). As a result of thc,sc, and other studies, a total of 222 site,, and thr<'t' i,olated find& were identified within the scope of the records search (TablP 1). These included 11 pr1ehi,turic- i e., Native American-- sites, thre,:, o f which Jbo had hb turic-period components, 12 historic-period sites, and [ 99 historic-erJ built.1111gs, groups ofbuildings, or othc-r built-environmc,nt features. The isolates \\ ere fragments nf glass from hi,,toric pericx:I botUes.

The prt'historic rl'l-Ourn-s w~re recorded as , ites containing brorock milling features, groundstone pieces, and C'hippe<l ,tone toc,b and dc,bitagc. The historic-period st I.es included '; L.ith: rt>d n ~fu st-", '.) tru ctur11J niins, wuter conveyance and d ive rgen~ i:,ystt:" ms, remains of a mining ul"'raliun, two c,kct1ical substations, a segment of the forrn"r Southern Pacific Rail way (now a part uf the • Uniun Pacific system), and the Gilman Ranch . A~ fur the hi,torir-era building,, doll's of construction ranged between ca. 188.\ and 1961. A number of th~ bulld1ntr"' and ~ tru rtur;1l n1ins foun d within the SC'Ope ot the records ~ ea rch we.-e record,.._\ along tfw north and ',{)11th ~ ides ol Lincoln Street, the main route of the recycled watt>r p•pt'lin~.
r,..:ATIVF AMERICAN PA RTICIPATION
In ,.,, pun "" tu CRM 1 ECH's inquiry , the Native American Heritage Commis.sion r<•portt•u that tht> ~acred J.-=1 nd s reco rd se.:1rch identified no :'Jati\"e American culturdl ft!'•,ourC"t>.., in thl' 8 YJ/.ff~l :::~ c -~~~~-~~:·~-. '" i:~~.1
f,:-. _, 1·~-;_> }\;; ~••• L~ _-.

I -- Lo •-
0 143l . f·
IV
O -. -
I
of• s . ' ·. ' ....... "~--, E.; p ~--:'-· --:.- i·t-·;,:: :, I , , - 0:. ,-, . {. ... .:.· < ~--~ -..:: • -~:---~---:. ··• ,;• ITi:=~11;__1_,·
081~-t-_,
J ~ ,.. 4720 ,~ 1
I
l
A,-• otPDltnllME" tCtt
AJUtFQW1°' 1tlY -~,,,~
i\~-.s ---· ... ,.,_ . I,\ I ,-_ -···--::: k ... ,~ .-... 1, 1,, •• • ~-: 1\} .••• . ;,-,~.
t;.' ..
06 09?4
t
i
l.l!!eM !:iUIWJI
SCALE 1:2.4,000 . '""'
2~ 1nt
0-'-'"•"\
F1g1irr ,lJ . l'rrviou!li 0,.1!tur.,l rr •,nurcr,; llllr\"I"}.,. in th,• ._irinit)-' ot thr ;,pt; (...,._.,;: t"m pnrtion). ti,:.k",l hy l".IC (,.k• 11umbrr l.oc.1ti~ ... u! h1storical /, 11d1icolo~ tu.l sltH .irl! not :.ho._,,.n .u • prot~ct,ve m.cuun!•. i .... ,
1177
N X' "'" 5-----,,.~( •
G
o· '.·-i .
1·
I
U~ 8
riro~ T ·,
1 z------_. :~-- i . I -~~ -' .... ·. ." .. ·\ • .-, . ~ .:· ·--[ ... ·.! j -. -·": :.' i -. .. rr---• ·:
1 l -.. -.. . ~ 9-1.J;---', •• ' I "\. \..
i~. . ., • • ·-' ,.,, • .;~
002•· , *• ~--' ·-,,--:;-~ -,._,,~•.: Q4_--------:\, .! /-'l, l (.,.,,..A,1-,,,...._ I 1' \~ · ··· 1-:·•:· 3900 \~\ ._ I ,, I .• r-; ·, ;,.,_, '--~ 477 . ' 1)' / -~ • '
J -_ ..... _ /.:.; ,.. r -_. •• ' ! • • \.,....·<~ "--" ) /'"' c::l 1 c::.r ,,.,..,.,, :;_ - L' \.~-\ 1, • ~ ':? ~ • • , \> I • • ' • •••
a:!, .,_.._ Ho,c_.:>Nco - I 0-, a,. j -------.. . . .... -~-,, pr.-· -----· • • .... , ... ...,.,

7.··'-~ ·; """'"'"" • I· : J, c=-• -· ~ , \:::.~_-_\,
L, c...,__ 1837 • ;· ~ -'_,., j l!, --•--·
r "!' ill.:.
r·· ~~,r-~.-·
i'.
r V.• • ' I 1000 SCAll'! O l :JC.. 1UIIO000 2tDlfecl --• Fi~ UIY - ib . Prev , ou• Clllhmil A: JQ\ lr« J § Uf'" C)° I 1n tm.-,• idni\ y u/ ! hi! A l >fi ( 11!, aknl f' ll: tlon). lt> kd by EiC fil(" numb..- r !(, c;-., 11wi.. uf h1,; tnnnl/ art" h1rttll• 1jit", I ~•l~s ,.,. e 1101 ~ lu:iwn u • protc: ctt\~ mc-a sur4:!. 10 Table 2. Pre'-'iUl.1 51Y Rierurded Cu llurill Rc !.Oun"'CS withjn the Scooe of lhe Record s Sea rch Site Number Description
CA-l(IV-57 J>rchisto,ic habil~ lion s.ile
CA-R IV-254 One 1;:..n?L' ceramic oJla
CA-RIV- 372 J<L"vorti:tl loca tion o ( an Indian vill.12.e CA-RJV-373 H~oorlcd IOQli on of ar'l Indian vHla~e
LA-RJV- 1701/ 11 Gilman Runch Historic J>:, rk {including an Indian vjlJ;,~e si te) CA-RJV -3HJI I His toric- period refuse sca! ler
CA-RJV-3-l-14 11 1listoric- pcriud refuse sc.a llc r
LA·RlV-5678 1I Rod:.-iln d -mort:,, chanlld
CA-RJV-56791 1 Roc:J;.-, md- m <a.-t,u cha c\nc l
LA•RlV-5847 Rock art, miUin~~ h:iJtun: s, and artifo cl'i CA-RJV-5818/ 11 Bt'drock millin,:t foa lur~~. two histotic-oeriod artifacts ancl struct\ nal debris CA-RJV- 6381 11 A St"~:ment of the Southern Pacific ( now Union PJcific) Railro. ld cA-RIV-7544H l li51oric- p~ riod wpt11r cont rol foalurci::

CA-RIV-781S H Hi5. toric~pcriod wa ter diversion system CA-KIV-7816 H Foundalio11 and associated remnants of hbtoric--~ riod JYSiJe- ncc CA-RIV- 7817 H His toric- period refuse including riveted met.al pipe, car ti res, metal barrel , and wood p,. md~ { rom lhC' 1940s
CA-RJV-412271 1 r=ound, itivn ,1ml associated rcinn. 1nls of historic- period residence CA-IUV-82281 1 r=u1.1nc..lfl tion .ind as sociol~ tl rcmnan ls of historic-- period residence CA·R IV-41229 11 Foumfahon .. iml assOOotcll n?mnants of historic- period residence; refu~ CA-RIV-8263 Prefli:, tvrk R.'SiJi:nti ill bite .tl Gilman Ranch 33-7879 Henderson Bui lt1ing ( ca. 1880s> or Ri?id Muilding ( ca. 1890s• pre5e. nt), 54 S. San Gorgonio Ave.
33-7880 Cop lin House / Spokane l-lolel, 12 S. San Go.,, onio Ave., co. 1900 33-8332 Sin~ Je- famiJv dwt>llinc, 70 E. ff;;1rbour St., rn. 1890s 33-8333 SinJ.;.k•-fami1v d,vellini.-::, 225 E. Ba rbour SL, ca . 1892 JJ- 8334 Russell JOnl~ Ho u.5ie, 391 t.. Barbo ur St., ca. 1900s 33-63.'15 Sin~l~-famil<J dwelling, 434 E. Barbour 51., m. 1920s 33-8.136 ! iin,z.l,2-r:imth• dwclli.n,g, 451 E. Ba rbour St, ca. 1890s 33-8.337 O.1vis Hom~. 933 E. Barbour St, ca . JH92
33-83.18 D. Frank SDutlnvort h Hou' ic, 1487 E. Ha rbour St, ca. lY0Us 33-8345 Srngl~• famil' i dwclline. 215 E. Cco r0:c St., Col . 1923 33-8346 Ka rt Bro wn Honw,. 271 E. Geor2e St., ca. 1900s 33-8347 Rrl."iC 1-tnu>.c, 779 E. Gcor1?.cSt., C. L 1910s 33-8350 CeoN!': e PMicr House-. 122B 5. Hare. rave 51., ca. 1888 33-8351 H,1nnin2 Vlloman ·s Club. 175 W. Haves SI ., ca. 191Us 33-BJ.52 Sin2.te-famHy dwellinJ:, 322 C. John SI., CR , 1YOUs 33-8355 Sin2lc- fornily dwellin~. 334 N. M urrilY St., c, 1. l'JlU 33-8356 The San Gori: oniolnn/ Br,·ant House , 150 E.. R,,msev St., c,,. 1884 33-8357 Fox Theater / Corey Building. 8-1 IV. R.lmsey St., ca, 1928 33-8358 Ilolel Banning. 225 W . Ramsey St., ca . 1920:; 33-8359 Purcell House, 11639 N. San Gorgonio Ave., Singl e-fomily dweJlinst. c.i . 1932 33-8360 Banning Hi~h School, NE com er of Snn Gor~ onio A,.-e. and Nicolt:" tSt., ca. 1935 33-8362 llolcumb Build ing. 405. San Gors,: onio Ave., c•. ' J900s 33-8363 Conrild Crnf J louse, 7175. Si\n Go~ onio Ave., ca . 19J0 33-8399 Sins: l•·l•milv dwelling. 132 E. Wesley St., ca. 1920s 33-8400 Volloro Ilou>e / J.R. Fountoin Ilouse, 270 E. Weslev SL, ca. 1888 33-9096 M.uv Ellis Home, 170 W , Williams St., ca. 1910s J- 9097 Uan nim~: Unified School DistrictOftices, 161 W. \Villi~mS>St., ca. 1908 33-!)() 1)8 Ch,uHe Morri5 House, - i86 \'II . Willii1m5 St., ca . 1897

33.9099 Sin2. le-fomily dwellin£.. 530 W. V',.'illiilms St.~ GI. 1902 Recorded partially within the APE
11 1178
Ta b le 2. Prcvioush Rerot d e d C ullu ril. l Re, so 1.1 rce' i w ith in th e Seo~ o f th ~ R ero rd s Sr. n t h ( Co , Hi nu e d ) Site Numbi..-.- J?.:-.~ E_ tio n
13-9100 Smolt:"• f.imity Jw~ llins,-~ 2 '\J. \-\' oodl .. nd St., o. 1933 11-9104 \ tcAIJi.. lt>r I lo11lt'. 111 \ l. riri; t St.,, a . J" l\11, T •ble 2. Previously Recordt"d Cultur~I R~sou rc:t111 w ilhin the Sc-O_r(' of the Records Sr.irch CContinued l Sile Number O r .. nipti o n
33 91& 0 SmRl•- tam, h• d" ellin,:. 121 I W Jhm .. -1 ~t., ,,, 1910<. --- 33-9105 Sm• k-tam ,h u><elhn><, 125 '- l f1r,t St.. ca 1932 31-91(1(, Sfnr, k- Eamih d"• ellinJ:;.. 144 N. rir, t St., ca. 1920s ------- Si~ le- f_am1l y d"- t-llmK, 157 N Fu~ tSt ., c.t . 1910s 33-9108 -- Sm2le- f•m1lv d" elhn~ 160 N Fu-. tSt. ca 1910s 33-?IO'l -<;,, int A~n•• Church / Gra<:,e Lutheran Church. 111 N ~ cond SL. ca . 1930s 31-9161 Single family d\< i.•~llm11., 1231 \ i\ RamSt-\' <;t .-:-rn . tql{ r.,, 33-9-163 &! elm MuikhnY,,. b5 ~. S., n Gorgonio A~ II;.'., <". J . 1920-. l1- 91M H o12~ 1· s l hnft Shlfi/ L. S J'ost OHIO", 125 N. San Lor_ sonio Avr!., 193( 1!. 11-91,,, ! Jtagero. 1ch Pr~ss-uildmg/ B D \-\ail-.on Bu11dinr,.. IJ7 ' J . Si'\o Gorn.on,o Ave , ca 193t)r. 1Vi16i, Jann Moore House , 1023 J\ San Goreonio Aw ., rn 1910,, 33- 9110 CD Ham11lon Homr. 181 l'j_ Second St. ca. ) 8905 l~91i1 Un ,""1 M~,h-uu~.-235 N. ~cond St , ca . 1928
EiJlo7 Si.ngl,•-f.tmil) d\'\ ellm&: 111 I :". ~ 1n Go~ omo A'-'f>., ("a . ! 920-. 33- 91• 5 SinglC'- f.1mil~, d....,· elhn& 1419 ' i\. S.., n Go~ omo Avt:>, c-11 lQ JO:-, H-9112 D r. Ryan I lumtir, 115 :' I. Third St., oi. 1'1UI. Js 31-916'1 ~ intlc- f.:imilv d\.\ ellrnst. 1455 i'\ Sdn GorR, omo Av~, ca. ! 920s 1-? tll \ 1eth"' 115t P•rsono~•. l!IQ N Thtrd St, ca 1897 ii::9t70 Si.n-.lc -iamil\t d"'· eUmst. 1 ~~ :\ s.,n Gor,: l"11C1 Av••-, i a 1920-. 33-911 ~ ~ omue ls I Jo me , 3l>l N Third St. ca. 1908 -· -- 1Yli7i ~ inaJe fom ih d"' elhnst. lS&> ~ S.., n Go~on•Cl A, P, c-a ! 920... 33-~116 Sin2l•- lamilv dwellin£. 521 N. Third St., ca 19IO 31- 917! Sin~le famil y dwe-Uinv.. 1&11 , 5."n Gort! omn Aw•., en 192. 0:,.. 33-9117 F.F Le-,no11 Hom~. 181 N Fourlh St. L. l. 1887
H-? IIM Osborne House , ~16 N Fourth St ca 1923
33- 9ll9 Rut11erforcl House , 38~ N t 1f111 St. ca. 1912 33- 91:! U Sln2le- t.1mily dwelhna.. 6W \\ Ha\cs :>L, ca 1920~ 33 0121 Sin2le -bmily dwellin£. 101~ W Ha yes St .. co . l921Js 33 91 .• Sin2le- fom1ly dwelhn£. 1067 W Hove• St, ca . 1'120s 33 9123 Sm~ Je family dwelhnr., iU Kin-, SI .. ca_ 1910<. 33 9124 5m£ le familv dwollin• ~ Km• St , ca. 1910s
11-9171 ·-- Single lami l} d"" elhng . 1661 N S.1nGorgoniC1 A,P. 13-9174 ~ u1~ k tJmil }': d\\•e11in& 17b '\ San Go~omo Aw•. ira 191{),., 1'\-91'75 ~ i.ngte f.-,m~ dke-Jlm&: 2QfJ E ~ nta Ruirl., c-a . 1920.. -,'\- 9t7o Sin, slc fomi! r d" elhn& 3190 V, e.s twtUd Av~, c._, ) Q'> Q _ l\-91"' 7 Single famil~ < l"'eJlm&; lb5 W \\' eo; twMri A\·P. r :1 . N '\ f)o, _ 13-' J178 Sing__ Jt.· filmily dwdhn& 116 N f-ourth S t . CJ 19?Qs H-9179 Sm! S.!~ li1m ilt J...., ellm& H 1 N I our th Sl . c..1 J 0205 . _ _ 11-! 24i.~ -- J lii.toric Jo" ntuWfl !; annmg c-ommera~1 dtslrkt boun1- 1r< l h y Rumwv S L, L1v1nx: o. h.>n 33-9125 Sin2le-- familv dwellm11, !> II W. Ki~ St ., ca . 1910. 3J- QJ~ 6 Sing1~ familv dwelling,,.._., Linda Vista Ur, Cd 1920s 33-9127 ISmele- f,,m1lv dwe) hn~ 94. b Lmda VISta Dr., ca 1920s St., S an Gm~_mo Ave ., , mJ ~'lurra.~ St, c~ ) 8.b(l'i. 1-.,20:s 13 .. 17,,2,, 1h -:toric~.-iud i-.oLltc.\ Dicccs ol 2.l.:as. s lrom in(' s..1me OOttle

3.. 1- nns 1h -. tnnc-- pcriod bu ildint,;.-. dm.. l fuund a li()fls , it 317& and 3190 \\l{'~f\o,.• ard c;t ., e. i rl y 20 th 33-9128 Sin. le-famdv dwelhn£. 1118 Londa Vista Dr .. co. 1930s cen tury 13--912' 1 Commerct~ l buildin£. 1&0 lV , Ram5t" Y St.. ca . 1930s n 1srn2 1-' tehistorlc millm~ feature-sand htStoric-_ penod minmg lJ--9130 I {,_omrm: rdi1J bu1ldin£. 170 \. V , Ramsev St.. ca. 1930s 33 151U3 Historic- penod road th. it ll"ad~ to m1111n~ s1 le 33-9131 Mason Moote 8u1Jdin~ 185 W. Ramsey St, ca. 192. 8 33-151113 Smgle- fom1ly dwll!' lh ng, '\ 71 _ E." l~t W,•:,., ll:j'_~t-:-c..a 1950 t1-' iJJ7 1lendnd.' s Marllt. HJ J'\ San GontonioAve , ca . 1930s 33-1511! 4 Smg~- fam~ we- Jh~ g. 1 15 i=:~,t \·h•-. 1~ ~ L~. rn . 19- 19 H-9111 AmPru:an 1._.2.,on 111'11. 375 N . Siln Gore:onioAve-, C1' 19'21 n-qlJ-1 1 \.. KIil Fellows Bullchn~ 25 SouUl San Goraonio Ave., Cl . 1920s 33-15185 Single"- fam1ly dwelh':'_&, 2~~ ~ t W_l'~-. u . 1951 33-15181> Sm~ lt-- fam1.! r._ dwf'! I~ 24~ ~ 1:. t \\ ll•~l~t :-. t.d ~~ O' i 11- 9ll~ S,nv.1.--lam,1,• clwelhnl!. 873 N f-irst St., ca 19305 11-Sll6 ' 5mv.. ll:"-fom1lv dwdhn£. 889 '\ I. Flni t ~ t., ca. 19305 31-9117 _ ~ ingl~-famil)' rfw~lling, 901 ~- F~r~t Gt. ca. 1~30s 33·9138 in le f;,m ~ d_,~~•~. 93_? ~- Fir ~ I ~t.. r-.1. ~ 9~ 33-9139 ~ miry dwt•!.!!_ 11_&, % 1 ' J. '-:_i!'•' St., tt~. _ 192~ u---~ ingk }.:. mi_~ d,-.t.•l1i! 1.&_ 97A ' 1 . Fir-. t St .. c.>. 19' 10-:,_ 33-9141 5111: t;~ arnil y dwclJinO' I~ fir. t2!:.:.. i:.. a. 1?20<. 33 9142 Siostlc f.:imil1 Jv. d1in_g, 1119 \,/_ fi,-.,t i;r_, ra. 192~ 33-9113 Sin~) e tamilv d~ cllin~ 1138 ~- fir. t S L, r.1. J9 10.. 33-1>187 Sin, tle- fom2!., y dwPJlin_ s. 18~_E., .. t Wt.", lf!\' ~L. ,,., 1946 ¾:~::

S1~ ltt- fam1ly dw~ JhnK.,- 4251!. 1 ... t th, ntt._,.., !:» t.. l J . 1920c.

Si~ g_!~:.!! nnjly JwL' llin1i1:., 390 w~ t H, nbour St. til . 19. J U~ 33-15190 SinKR· l.Jmily J\'\- dhn~ •UO l::.a s l lS. irbou t St. ca. 1930s 3315191 s;n~le -l•mily dwollm11, 421 East ll.lrbour St. ca l~J() Jl- l51Q2 ~ i1Hl: lc -l.1mih d"" ell11,,._, J'IO 1:a. st H.11 1nse}' 51 . ca JQ205 33· 15193 S; n•lc fomHv dwelhn11,-! 02 f..151 R•=• St ., co 1920. 33 151!1-1 Smal• family dwellino.. 381 !., st W,lli•msSI., <• 191 7 JJ lj!9~ Sin2.le lamil\' dwe1Jin2..403-411 l:.ast WiiholJTis St., ca . 1Y40s 33-911 I SinQ. 1e -~ Jmilv d\ o\ c-lJin~ 651::. il.~ien~ .• cJ7" 92. f1'. 33 1~191, Sinsde -famil\ d\\el1m1t. 380 E..~st '.'.\11colet St . ca 19~ 33-91-lS Sin~ lc, £.i_!l'i!t <l~L:!_!in& 1_1 Em, ign S t .~ cil . L92£ b 33-Yl 17 Mi. de r 1- tou~. 1o2. b W. ~ ur~ e- 5L. c.1. 19 10-. 33- 1~197 , inate famHv dh'ellin2. 416 Drun Ln , c,1 1938 33 1519& Sine.le l.imilv dwelhn2. 436 Drury ln., c,1 1" 36 33--'JH~ ~ m~ k famU \ I d\ o\ C" llin~ 59 Lanc. bih? t Hd., c.t 1920-. JJ -151W Sinale- f•milv dw•lhni,. 464 Drurv Ln , c,, I9J6 33-Yl~ Sine. Je. tamilv J\.\ elline... 1221 \\". Li n coln SL, c-.11. 192. fb JJ- 1:,200 Sin2,le--£am1h, d"•e11m£. '1?1 Drun· Ln , cl\ 1935 33-Yl51 Sm~ J~ fa.mil'¥ d"'~! Unit. 78 \'\'. Pc 1~Jldu11 Rd., t..a. 1920~ 13- 91, 2 SinRle- t,mil, d'- ellin£. 14~ W Pendleton Kd . <• 1'120, 3'.1-9153 1Con11, tant ino' s .1HooDPr Lafe, 110 \'\ 1 Ramsey St c,1 193Us 3'.l--91~4 t B,mnm• C,ty Ilall , 169 W Ramsev St
33-91~; -· commerrial build in~ 260 \~. Ramse\< St.. ca 192Ds Jl-9J' i6 B; ionm~ ~ IPdu:-al Chmc, JJO \V Ramsey St 6 Cil JQOOs l]-9 157 Smlllt-- fam,~\-· cl \•.- t'llio!;,, 38~ \'\ 1 R11m~ y St., ca JlJZUs 13- t 520S Sin~ k-- fannly dwelh n v ... t70 r,...,, ~.Q! fil:_') t .. C" iJ. 1920 d-l~:>09 t;1nY. le- fam1ly Jw .. lh n n:: 55 f:i'~I £. t•~ t ~n. 1936 13-1~2tO < iinr, lto- fam1( Ldw~ lh1: Ji, 41R f.a:-. t C.rtu},; t· St., r a. 1940 U--1~2ll i:;inp1t,-. f;;m1h-, h~ crllinM,. .!! Z.. L"l~I (,i:•1,i!!"it..· St ~ ca. ! 9;{}.., Jl-t,.12 ~_! n~ fllmlll d,,· 1~~ -~ ~~ t Hot r-r ~t.. c a. 11.J:;5 H- 152ll ; iintl.-·- family J""'. d lin&,_ 1A5 r..:.-.t H ulis.'"~ t.! <d . 19"" R ~ 11-1~·214 ~ mi~ J..-. family dwt• llin~ 12t;,,) Norlh Allc~ ndru St., t. J . 1934 --- 9159 Smt1c-- fam 1lv dwdhn. e... H)2S W. Rilmse,· S1,( a. J'JlOs Rf'corclt"d p.uti .illy ,....ithm th.,-AP[ 12 13
1179
fable 2. rrevioush Rnordrd Culharil R.uources wilhin thr Scoor or 1hr Records Se.uch (Continued) he " Jumber I Or111;(' riplinn
l- 1' 21> . S10J,~ lt•-1ami lv dwf-' lfinK, 11 90 North <; an Cm1ton1n AvP, C l 19' l8 33-- lS2I6 Sm-"~ fom,h-,hvt>llinv., SJ \Ves.t Gilman St . ca 193-1 33-- 1521 7 Sini;::le-fanulv d\vf>llinJ!.. ~ west Cilm<ln Sl , ca . 1939 33 1~21~ Sm2h,-fam1lv d-, eJlmi,, IJ4 WeSI Gilman St. ca 1930 33 15219 - Si112le-f,milv d ... emne, 130 West Gilman St , ca W27 33 15220 Sm~k -1.im,lv cf,,..·dhng, 158 Wl"st Gilman Sl., c.i 1CJ3S 33 - 15211 Sin1tle-fJmil '{ d\o\·ellin~. 17-1 We-st CHma n St., ca . 1938 33 - 13222 Sin~le -famil\' dwelJin,g, 190 \\ est Cllrn.an St., ca. 1938 33-- 15223 Singh:-fomi h J"·~ llinx. J195 Lind.. Vi.\ti:1 Dr., GL 1953 33 15214 SinRle -fam,h dM-t.•lhniit, J7H We,t Gilman St., c .. 1954 33 - 15225 S1nstlo famih dwell mi,, 624 We, I Gilman St .. r. i 1939 33 -15226 ~ in~le-famih J"' dhnR, 666 \l\ie:~ LtlinJn Sr .. L.l. 1954 33 ! 5227 SinJ.:. k. t.m,ilv <l\'n,:lli11}!... 69- 1 Wt.: MC. ihti. in S L, u. 1953 l3-152ZB Sin.Jt~ fomily Jwellm~ 1212 North San Co~umo A ... t!, c.a 1937 33 15229 Sine.le f.imiJv dwi:-llinL 1221 North Siln GonmnioA,,c., c.a 1939 - 33- 15' 3( 1 Sloe~ tamih. J~ellin1?.. 73 We<l Gilman ~L. L...il. 1951 33 15:?31 Sitti,:k fJ111ilv Ll\,cllinc. IJCJ \ Vc:,,,t t..ilm.:m 5l., t.J . 1917 --- 33- t 5232 ~ iu~Jc t.amdy J\.., dlin~. 125 Wr-.t (~ilman St., c.11. 1935 13 1523] Siu~ lc f;umh- U"" t'lliuJ. C, 9;:\ Wt·-. t ~ Jm, m St.,-~·.: 1 . 193tb --- 33 15234 Sini! lc fo1mi lv dwdling. 265 WL•-.t Lilman ~ t.. r.i. 1945 33- 1523, Sin~lc ldm1l v dwcllin1- t, 425 \' 1tl·~ t (;' ilman c.',1., n. 1952 33- 152.. 16 Sm~l~ famalv dwel1inJ,. SCJJ Wesi {.j•Jman St., ca. 1950 33- 1~23 7 Smgle--fdmily dweUinl?.. 505 Wr-sl Gtlman S1 , ra .1950s 33 152. 3a Single ldrmlv dwcllinl!.. 575 We.:.t CilmJtl St ., ca. 1950s 33- 1:, 239 Sin~le famil\' dwelline. 609 West Cilmilcl St., ca. 1940s 33- 15210 Simde-lamil ,. dw~lli.nR., 619 WPsl Gilman SL, ca. 1910 33 J:,2~1 Hrinlon Rand, IJ15 Jll. lO Hnnton H.o.1d. CJ. 19- Uk ----~--, 33- 152') 0 Sm2le -fam1lv di,.-~lhnit. 482 Urury Ln. ca 1935 ------- 33- 15293 Isolated shard5 ol h1!-lonc period '-Un altered ,nane-_Jnei.t" d .. '-.., 33- 152'•~ Isolated shards of h1s1011 c-pcnod milk and perfume bottle 133- 15655 Preh1~tonc millm~ ~tick
33- 1.>678 Prehistoric m 11l mR. f.fid, s.
33- 1!>802 Sm~l~·family dm,Jhn~ 176 W« l Lincoln S t., c•. 1\151 33-1~ Smgle-ramilv dwe-JhnS!;. 275 h.1-.1 Lincoln SL. GI . l950s 1J- l 'Wl7 G1nr.le-tam1h, f'iwPlhn~ 37') 23Td St, ca . l96~ ll- 1 ~'!l'lii ~ on.i;le-fo m,ly J"< lhn!l:, J&) 23rd St.. ca . !%Os 331S80' I "', mgh·-IJmdv 1.h\-t-llmr., 11,~(} Wt--.t Llnroln St., c_.. 1950tio ll-l'wllO 1-itnJ!k-1.im,h, , h,,..Jhng, 1430 \\' est Lmroln St., c,1 1~50 1}"15111 1 i;inu_J.·-lann ~ d\' ft: tilinr .. 1476 \ Vl"-t Linn1ln St, ca . 1917 j:f. 1, 1; 12 ~ m1:k·-£amliv d weUin~ 157 l \\ e---1 Ltncoln St .. ca . J9SUs J. l-i~Sl l ~ 1n~i<--fom1lv d"elhn! l:, lbl7 Wes t Lincoln ~t .. ca . 1947 - 33- 1581 4 " iin>: K'- lam, lv dwPllin1;, 1"' 61 \'\. p-; t I inroln St, C<'I Jt~Os

1.,ic;KI~ Si n v.:l~f .1. m1h , 1wellm£.. lb')] Wrst Lincoln St. c~. 19~ 11:~ ~ 1!8~~01m1.~1 .. ~·h,.,1Jmi-, 17()(, \\ est I mcoln St, c~ 195"1 33 15817 ~ m_ gk· fJm1 l_v Jw,· 1111!£_ 172~ \-'\' i_,.., J t mcoln :; jt .• ca. 14hJO 33 l581R ~ n_£ lr -tam 1lJ Jwrlling.. 200'._ \\~ P" i l { in, oln St , i:-a 1956 33 l5JSlq SmElt: fanulY dh·ell.!.!!f;. 2()08 \\ 1e-.1Lincoln St .. ca . 1959 33- 15820 Sine:Je--lamil\ d"elHn!!.. 2025 \\' e-.t Lmcnh, St .. c.1. 1921 33- 15821 ~ i.nel~-famlh d"dHne:. 2028 \\' e:,.l Ln'LLuln St , (J_ 1959 - 33- 1~' 7 Smele -lam1li,; dv,1elHn2. 20-J . . J \\- bl Lmcoln ~l-<.a l9bl 33 - 151S23 I ~m ~le -Ja1mh dh\.•Umg. 20t9 \Y('<,,l Linml n <,1., CJ . 1957 14 T.11blt" 2.. T' rrviou,- ly Rccurdcd CuJlura! Rrsourcrs wi lh in th~ Se o~ of th r Rec. ord s ~ r.udt. ( Continued I Sitr Number _ DescTI.rtion
JJ--15824 ' imt_!jlr-li:tmilv J....,clline.. 2071 We- st Llncc, l n ' it.!_ ••:_1~ 33 - 158;>.', 5in},'; lt>- lami11t d'"" ellmg. ZOtSO Wt> 5t Lincoln St ., c-a 1% l 33 1582b Smgle-~ amily d ..... ,. llin,&. 2102 W~t Lincoln St., c.~19!..'.I 33-15827 Sm~l,~f;1,m_~· d ....... lting. 2120 \.'\ esl Lincoln St. c~. l96l 33 1562!1 !:> mg lf"-l ;1m11Y dwcllin,;. 2131 \'\ n t Lmcoln St., c.11. 1~ ... 33 15829 SmF,le-ram1F dwtllin5: 2148 '\,\'t:st Lmcoln St, ca 1960 33 15830 Sme.le--f ;1,mil v dwt.·lli~ 2156 We:i.t Lincoln St. cil. 196t 33- 15831 Smgle--f11m1ty cl\ ... cllinK,. 2174 \-'\'est Lincoln St _, o . 196( 33- 15832 S ma: l ~f amil~· < lwd ling. 2290 Wrst Lincoln St., C"a. 196[ 33 - 15833 Sinv:hH am1ly J"" clli ,,g. 2343 ·234~ \\' e-5': llncoh, St.~ c. i. 1940.. 33 - 15834 ~ m2IP-fam1ly dw .. lling. 2387 \-\iest Lincoln St , ca 19-'0o:. 33 - 15835 Sm2lp.-fam11\: d v., .. Uin & '.:413 \.\'~ t Lincoln St , c• 195't 33 15836 Sin2l~family c1~-.... 11ins 2437 Wesl Lmcoln St . ca 1950-i 33 - I S837 Sme.le-fam1tv d-wt'lhng. 25l9 '\,\'es t Linrnln St , ca 19:>0-; 33 15838 Sintlf"-fam1h: d~H,llin!S, 2637 W~l Lincoln St . ca 1961 33 - l ';! IJY Sm2.le---ram1 lv d\-.·ll!'Umg. ?671 2673 ~\~ s , Lincoln St, ca , ] 9,J l.'J- 15& 10 Sin2le---fam1h,· dwe{ hng. 2699 W,•,I Lincoln Sl., c.1 1938 13- l ' il!- I I SinRIP·l•mily dY.~lhnJ.. '1705 \\' 11!,I Lint.oh, St . c. 1 l'JSOs - JJ- 151< 42 Single--fam1ly dwelhnp- 272.J \-\'~ .. 1 Lincoln ~t , c,1 1938 - JJ. I S! l43 Bannin2. Substaho n. Lmcoln St.,""· 1934
33- 1">1144 Cove- Lane 1luu~, m1d -l0tl1 nmturv ---
33 I Sl!- 15 Sinsr.le--fam1ly Jw~Chnu., S Jn Jimol('O Canyon Rd ., m1('1-20th ~ nh1ry 33- t5ll4b Zanf,1 Su~t,la lwn, 3-L763 Junipt!r t\ H•nUi!, ca 19~1 11n mediate project vicinity . However, noting that "th" absence of specific site information in the Sacred Lands File does not guarantee tht> abt,en ,-p of cultural resourcC'S in anr 'art'a of potenli.11 effect'," iltc com.mission sugge~ted that local Native American representatives be rontaded, and provided a list of potcnti ,11 contacts in the region (see App. 2).

Upon receiv rng the Native American Herilagc Commission's response, CRM TECH wntaLled all six individuals on the list .tnd the or);;anizatiun.'> they represenl. ln addition, John Gomez, Jr ., Cultural ResOl1tCC'S Coordinator for tht' Ramona Band of Cahuilla Indians, was also contacted at the recommendalion of ITihal Vice-Chamnan Joseph Hamilton.

Andrea CandelJaria, Tribal Receptionist for the S,1nta Ros.t Band of Missmn Indians, was later contacted by telephone. t\ s of thi , tim.-, two written r,-spon-;es and one verbal response have been received (sec /\ pp . 2).

An e-mail was received from Britt Wilson, Cultural R'"'° urces Coordinator, tor lhe Morongo ~and of J\llission Indians, on June 13, 2007. ln th,. e-mai l Mr. Wilson slate<; thal due to the close pro,Jmity of the Red Hands Village Site (CA -RJV -57) and a ,c,ck art 'iite CA -RIV-5847) to the undertaking. the Tribe believes that then• is a high pmbabihty thdt Nalivt> Amenca11 cultural resources could be discovered in the Al'f:.. 1 herefor,., 1h ..

Vlornngo Band rerommend <s archaeological monitoring for the undertaking, with at least one monitor bei11g ,. Native American from the Morongo Band of Mission Indians. The fribt• also wj-, h., s tu l>e pre<Rnl during any preconslruction meetings.

John Gume,,] r., of the Ramona Band ol C.:ahuilla Lndians, replied in a letll'r dated July 5, 2007. Mr. Go1nez states that the Tribe has no information regarclin )l cultural ro!,our<,-, within ti,,. APE, bu t re<.erve~ the right lo provide comments upon w,·iew of Ilw findings. A copy of tht> report wa ~ requested . Andrea Candcllaria, ·1riba.J Ht·ct·ptioni,t fur thl' Santa 15 1180
Rosa 8,md ol Mission Indians, slated by phone 011 June 22, 2007, that th .. tribe hd<l nu specilic concern, al lhis lime regarding lhe AP[, bul wuukl reserv.-tho, right tu be notified of Luty c.ultur1..ll r~ uret~s disc.-ovt'rt'd <lurin>; >,round -c.lbturbing ~ ctivitit--s.

HELUSURVEY
During th" fidd survcr, none of th" previously rccordro waler diversion /conveyance fl'aturt•s of Sit<' CA-RJV-7544 or . tructural ruins/buildings o! Sile 33-13778 was encow,tered within orimmediately adjacent to tl,e APE . CA-RIV-7544 consist<; of more than 30 structur,11 features scattered over a rather large area, delineated by an allencompassing site boundary that e~tends acrO'iS the propoSPd pip<'linP .,lignnwnl .

However, none of lhe features of So le CA-RlV-7S44 was pr<'viously r.-corckd within the APF. Allhough lhP boundariPs of <;,t., '\1-13778 encompass a portion of thL• J\l'l along Sunset and Weslward Aven11PS, ;ill nf the ,ornponenls of thl' Sitl' are localed outside the rua <l rights-of-way , dn<l uubidt' tho, Al'E buun<laril'>. Since thl' proposed undertaking has no potenh.11 to .,ffP<t eithl'r of thL'>" ,ill'>, tht•y du nut require any furtl1er consideration.

Iwo prt'viuu ,ly 11nrPCUrded , ites were l'ncountcred within the APE boundarie-s during the field survey, one near existing \\ dl l{J , and tl,c otl,cr localed on the 16-dcre WWTP expamion site. IJoth of tl1ese sit...,., since designated as 33-16207 a11d 33-16208 (CA-RJV1364), are from the historic period. Site 33-16207 consisls of a group of rural historic landscape features, including a row ol olive trees, a fence. concrete irrigation stand pipe,, a cistern, and a small, rectangular structural fooling, all located along the western o,dgc of the WWTP expansion site .

Si le 33-16208 is situated to the southwe,,t of Well Rl and northeast ofSouthern California Edison power pole~ 1989008[. It consists of hi,lork-pt,riod rt'fu,,.-found in low-density concentrations on both sides of Charles Street and ~cath'red to th.- northeast near Well RI .

The silc measures approximately 70 x 50 mete" and contains fragmented gl.iss bottles, ceramic kitchen wares, metal cans, and other household refuse ilems. Many of tlie artifacls found at Sile 33-16208, though fragmented , are tt>mporally and morphologic,1llv diagnostic.

Consumer products represented in th.- d.-p,r,it inrlud .. salve, medicine, moll.., carbonated beverages, bleach, preserves, tobacco, perfume , .ind canm'<-1 meat. to n.ime a few .

Mang.ine.e glass manufactured between IAA0-1920s was present at the sile and has turned amethyst 111 color from ,un expo,ur ... Makt'r\ marks on some of the bottle bases found al the site include (based on Toulou,e 1971 ): Southt'rn Gia ,~ Company, Vernon, CA (1917- 1931); Owens Bottle Company, Toledo, 0 11 ( 19 11 - 1929); Pacific Coast Glass Works, San Francisco, CA ( 1902-1924; P.idfic Coast Class Company, San rrancisco, CA (1925-19.'ll)); and Illinois P.1cific Glass Cornp ,my, San Fran<i,,ru, C 1\ ( 1902- 192~).

Ceramic marks included (based on Lehner 198H): Pacific Clay l'roducts Company, Los Angeles, CA (1922-19-1&); Carr China Company, Lrafton, WV (1916-1952); and O.E. lcNicol Potlery, Clarksburg. WV (1920s lYhlh). A kw church-key opened steel-top bevPrage can, date to 19J';- 19n0, and hinged lid tobacco tins, popular throughout th<' early and mocl-20lh ce-n1ury . were also found IIM/\CS 1992:-!71}. The presence of these datable artifacts sugg.-..1s thP refu~ w<1s < lrpositl'd at this location somelorne around the l920s19."\()<; 16 HISTORICAL OJ\CKGROUN O RESEARCH
Hisloric maps consulted tor thi ,, ,tudv indicate that the vicinity of the, J\PI:. , huwt'<l ample e, iJencP of human activities as early a, tht• mid-19lh century, !hanks in part tu its ]ucahon on tht' Cc,w maritopa-Bradshaw Trail In the 11150,,, wh~n th., U .S. government conducted the• first systematic land survey in the region , the• , orveyors noted a number of road, and Indian trails crisscro" inl( the largely barren landscape, including a wagon road that was undoubtedly a part of the Cowmaricopa -8radshaw Trail (Fig. 'i). Some of the lesser-known Indian trail, evidt'ntly rros,;ed ,·arious portions of the Al'E (ibid.) .

During the st'cond half uf th-, 19th , i>ntury, homesteading and other settlement / land development activitic,, gradu,1lly spread through lhe San Gorgonio Pass ,,rea, and in lhe mid-l870s, the Southern Pacific Railway joined the Cocornaricopa-8radshaw Trail Jiang roughly the same course . Ihe rumplt'tion uf the Southern Pacific Railway and tht' ub,equent establishment of the town of Banning in 188~ ushered in a major growth , purl n the proiect vicinity during the late 19th and .-arly 20th centuries. By 1897-1898, the town of f!anning had .-ssenlially Lah.en shape north of lhe AP[, with a ft>w streets extending into the APE (r,g. 6).

Between Ihen and lhe 1950s, the area ar0tmd the town ofBanning gradually developed a rulturJI landscape that was lypicalol rural southern California at tht' tim<', featuring a regular grid of nh,cro,;sing roads lined v.ith slrelches oi orchards and scallt'ro,d buiklings, most of tlwm prc•,umably farmhouses (Figs. 7, 8). fhat dcY<,lopment pattern Pvidenlly p<"rsi; t .. d in th.- ar.-a until tht> late 20th cent,ury, when southern California's 1hirst f>Jr affordablf' housing brought aboul acceleraled urbanization in the rnmmunitif'S in the San Goq:; onio p.,c:; 5 rt:'gion.
fo,t of thl· APE wa~ k1catcd ., long these various roads, and tl1e rest of it, primaril >· the WWTP •·xp,msion sit ... evidently remained vacanl throughout the historic period (Figs. 5- l!). Fom1t'rly I ut 13 ofthe Waverly Tract, lhe wwrr expansion site, including the area of Sit<• 31-16207, w," ac<juired by tlie City of Banning from Wailers. Hathaway around 1935. lhrec ye;,rs bt<fon• his df'ath ( County As<essor 1933- 1938). A prominent local merchant around tht- turn ofth.- 20th CPntury, Waller Hathawa} served as the, first mayor of !Janning iftt'r the nty ""' i11rorporated m 191J (Holl7daw 200'>:23).

Sinl"t' at it,a,t 1'll1, nu ast,e,~m.,nts had been levied for improvemenls on Loi 13 (County AS-,o,<sS<ir 1913-19'.)8), suggesting tl1ot neither a building nor any trees and vines were present on the property when it "as acquired by tl,e City. :' vteanwhile, no buildings or utht'r built -f'nvimnm.-nt f.-nture, wPre appdre11t .,t 0r ne.ir the location of Well Rl during Ihe hi ,torlt pt" rioJ , whPre- th iP" refu-..e, deposit at Site ."B- 162M wai; found. Th at area \\.' as, and ~till is, used for cattle ranching, as evidenCPd by free -range cattle that wen, ob<erved choring tht' field sur,·ey.

UISCUSSJON
Based on the rCSl'arch results discus;.ed abon,, the following ,t'Ction, pr"*"' the CRM TECH's conclusion on whcthL·r any · historic pruperti .-s '" or 'historical rPS<1urct>s,'" .; s defined 17 1181
r, c[' t 1' t ·1~~- T 4 j ·:··• 1:. , • .:!!:..!' J-> n .. ~~--· ~.,,~ ~~., .,,,,, 1 ... ~·,·· .. ,.,, _-··-· ..., .. , - U'" s,.-.,, 1 .... ~:.·. ;;, ·}'#:,, ~ '~•'. IWh l.-1 I\.•-,. •""' •••• • ,,-, -. J'• I ~-. J • •• ~( t
l --• -· i· ··-I / ·-~ ' •• ~ .,· ... I , x /_. _
C. () -~--• __ • Jrr ~\. _ ::•·'!~----: J , r,3 __ ~•'

1..1,,., ",, 1 .. ., 1c• 7 J.~ . l(o· ':" t". -~ <.,, c-> lf''"""•· ~• ,,,,.,J~, f''"'' . .-•, J•'(" : .,..,~ .. 1 -•
r--~
c.~--- 19" 1 • ; i --.,.,. -----· -<---~-~ ...... ---
c=---: t----=i~1:........:·,-
ol-;:,-.,7 -·•~-• l k" ...

N• ~." I (• 1:-• I I I ... • ·,
1 ::.~ _;;. , ,. "'" 1:· -" ·'~'. l'.: '- t, -.,, . ~,-•••• I • • ,.,.,~,: :;,· •• ', r-,, -• , ~ c4-• c._ ( , I : ~ "" •• ~ .,.,. : s .
k '"'-'·"\'-=- L ' ll -~
l!S._ . : -... I l •• _. z,.,:,,
1" i'. •• I . "" ,,, .. • .. " • . , ., , .• ' ., •" -~ " \) fu
A•• O( ll'olenlWlllfl' C ..
8 ,
tl
u1- r "-. : 1-.t ArE .,. J ..... Ju:~ h ~,,::. 1,-t.., 1~ rc:- r-- l;irt '"" 1•~-, IS
T· - 1---- 5
f .: t~_·:s-Z7t;\t~~'
c! .._ • :. _.·.,, ,. ; ....., ,,. r:,_ ,J!.'6$-1}._!... \.....,.., l"" 11 ' 1 ,,,. : - J•. Gfl ~ lj\c::-"r.-·. \J:··1•··t\. .....

J(~~;..t---= ;_..~: r;:;:~ r -.: 1-; fLrt
Are of ; o~~ nHal Effect& ·: _ .. ,},....:~ \ V -~_.,..:'~?'(~\ SCAl. E 1: 125, 000 . r, I·· ':',,- a\--·· -~~. f'
0 1 2m11CS :~ er <, '~, ~ , . r
F;gu re 6. TI,c APE and vicinit)' in 1897- 1898 ,
Snm «: USCS 1901)
SCALE 1 :&2.SOO
Q_ 1 mile
by Section 106 and CEQA regulations, are
present within or immedintdy adjacent to
the APE and may be affech,d by the
proposed undertaking.

DEFINITION
Historic properties," as defined by the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation,
include " prehistoric or historic district, site,
building, structure, or objL'Ct included in, or
eligible for inclusion in, the National
Register of Historic Places maintained by
the Secretary of the Interior" ( 36 CFR
800. 16(1)). The eligibility for inclusion in the
National Regi ster is determined by applying
the following criteria, developed by the
Nationa l Park Service as per provision of the
N,,tional Histori c Preservation Act :

The quality of significance in
American history, Mchitecture,
archaeology, engineering, and culture
Figur<· 7_ Th,, APE and virinily in 1939- 194 l. (Source: USGS 1942) 19 1182
r~•-,,, --... '• re~·-. ' 1--_,, ... .,.__ ·. t-< ~ .,
t··,
l ~ ~ 1 cr:.p~~;.-!F~~·1 "' f~~--·-;;' li_:-
t---..,--~
l -:-... f I -,,...__, 0 I \. ••• ~-~• _,,
I
1~· -·. - 711_,'~ , -, • , i~ r , , ... ·• ~,; ____ "
G O ,., ! o _ .. _ : • ••••· , •
t,,... ..... ' .$. ·••"" ~!~--:.-~------.: '.,' I 1" \- 1,;;;~ .. •• ~•~;,-•• ; '~ I ~-,:, .~- c -. r.'.,. ., • •~ '.(.'"-~ ... • ,._. j "'-.•., fl
1-- L -• .. ••,--"-="-.,.,.,. --·' -. .,,__, ~•--~- C~ r.,. • ~~ F•=-·•J ._ •• ,,_, .-"'-' • .... 7 •• \ •· I ._ r--,_ -, c ,:::- Z,>'_ l?' !''''")~
Arnof Po7onllal Elfec! S --,_ . , · to;.:· ~ ~ ...__, ": \/ ,-: r'.

SCALE 1: i2,SOO •·•·••-.-~~•,.

I m;rc ;:{~! J'-:

F1gure8 The ArE ,1nd VIClnlL) m lQ. i9 1Y51 ( Source uses 1956) is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that posses.,, mlegrity of location, design, setting, m<1terials, workmanship, ft'eling, and a5SOC' ialion and
a) that are associated with events that hav .. m,1dt" a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history ; or
bl that are associated with the li,·es of persons significant in our past; or c) that embody the distinthve char~~teristk, uf a typ<', period, or method of construction, or tli.,t reprewnt the work of a master, or that possess high arti~t,c values, or that r~pres,,nt a sii;nificant and distinguishable entity whose componl'nls m,1y lack individual di,tinction ; or d) that ha, e yielJ~d, or mdy b.- likdy to yield, information important in prehisturv or historv. ( 36 CF!{ 60.4)
I
L
l
1 \
for CTQA-complianct' con, ider;itions. the State of Californi,>'s Public Resources Code PRC) <' stablishes the definitions and criteria for 'historical resources," which require imilar protection to what NHPA Section 106 mandates for historic properti..,,. " l·Hstorical resource,," according to PRC §5020 .l(j), "includes, but is not limited to, any ohjc•ct, building, site, area. place, record. or manuscript whid, is historically or archa.-ologically significant , or is ~igniticant in the architectural, engmeering, scienUftc, econonuc, agricultural, educational, social , political, nnhtary, or cultural annals of Cahform;,." More specifically.

CEQA guidelines ~late that the term "historical resources" applies to any such resources listed in or determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Ilistorical Resource,, included in a local regish,r of historical resources. or dPtermined to be historically significant by the Lead Agency (Title 14 CCR §15064 .5(J)( l )-(3)). 20 Regarding the proper criteri;i of histurn al sigmlicance, CEQA guiddinl's mandate that "a resoura> shall be considered by the leaJ agency to be 'historically signific.mt' if the resource meets the criteria for listing un th,., C;,lifnrnia Rt>ii;ister of Historical Rc,oura."" ("J itle 14 CCR §1506 l.5(a)(3)). A resource may be listed in thP Calitornia Register it ii meets any of tht' following criteria:
l) J.., . 1,•,,ociate<l with events tha t have made a ...,it,'Tlificant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultur-1! heritage. 2) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our pa ,1. 3) embodies the distinctive characteristic, of a type, P"rio<l , region, or method of construe-lion, or represents the work of an important creativ" individual, or p<.>s,..,,ses high artistic values.
4) Has yielded, or may be likdy tu vieltl, information important in prehisturv or history. ( f'J{ C § 5024 . l (c))
As ,nentioned above, two previously recorded sitt',, CA-RTV-75.\4H and 33-13778, were n'portedly locatetl partially across the proposed pip.-lin.- ruutr, but the field survey revt>als that none of the features uf th<,se twu site, is l0<~ted within or immediately Jj,1<"\'nt to the APL ln addition, both of these sites were pn,viou,ly detPrmined not to be t,ligib!., for listing in either the National Kegister or the Califurnfo R,·gister (Taniguchi and Dite 2004: 1-3; Messick and Dice 2004 :2-4). J'herclore, the only pott'ntial "historic properties"/" historicJI rt,<,ources· present within Lhe APE are Site 33 -16207 and 33-16208 CA -RJV -8364). Pursuant lo these statutory and regulatory guidelines, Silt's 33-16207 and 16208 are evaluated unclrr the cnt<'ria for the National Register and the California Kegister, and the results of tht> evaluation are discu~sed below .

SITE EVALUATION
Site 33-16207
Sitt" 31- H,207 u)n,i<it'\ of d group of rural historic landscape features of unkno\ vn age, such i.,. oJive trt't'.,., a f~nC-t:>, and r~mndnt., of an irrigation ' i}'';len1. Although the s ite is located on 1,md onct' nwnt'd by Waltt>r l lalhawav, a notable local merd1anl and commLmity leader truuncl th .. turn uf th<' 20th c.-nturv, tfwrP is no evide11a- thal these features are closclv J<<unateo.l "1th 11.ithaway and the prorntnent role he played 111 the early history ot • R.mning. In fort, historic"! source, sugge<;t that at least some of the features, such as the ulivo; tre.-,,, likely post-date 11 .. thaway·s association with the property . ln addition, none of tlw featlirt's demon~trat~s a clo.St' association with any hi~torit.,1 .,v.,nt, special aesthetic values, or any other historical / archaeulugic"al merits ... , ht'refure, Sitt' 33-lli207 does not appear lo be eligible for listing in the National Register or th,- California Rt>gister, and doe, not appear to qualify as a· historic property " or a " historical resource ." Site 33-16208 (CA -RIV-8364)
The re/use deposit found and recorded as Sill' 33- 16208 rnntains ,m dbundance of temporally and morpholo~ically diagnostic artifacts that may provio.lt' vdluable information on the consumer practices of local households around tlw 1920s-1910,, ,.v.-n though th .. rclusc it.s<'lt does not appear lo be as;,.)( iat.-d w,th any particular hnu'>l'hold, a ~pecific person, or a his toricill event. fhe 5,jte may conta in a ~ u~surfo, e ("'ompont> ntr ;ii;.. it wa-; 21 1183
obsern- d lhal many of lhe ar litacls found on tht! 5urfa ce were p, trt ly buned . Whil e the 1920s- 1930s may no t be cons id e red a parti cularl y ea rl y penod m lo cal h, story, it wa s a lim e of accelerated grow th and dramatic chang" 1n Banning and th (' c• ntir e Unitecl S tate,, afte r the end of World Wa r I. during a d ecad e n f unprec .. dented prosperi ty and th e ensuing G reat Depres5 1o n, a nd be fore ih e U.S. in vo lvemen t in \ V orld War II.

In light of the location of the site. it may b<: a¼ Ocia tcd with res idents w ho hvo> d to the so uthea st of downtown Banning and were primarily agricu ltu ral ists, as ev ide nced by th e numerous orchards and farmhouses observed in h1 s lori c maps. Thi s are,, h as s in ce been developed and many of th e former fa rm s and ran ch es hav e becom<' th .. ,cen .. of n•5id .. nti a l and comme rcia l deve lopment,;, mos t of which nccurr .. d during the post- WWIJ boom.

Remnants of th e agricultural Jandscapefi a nd fre .. -rang .. catt le observed in the site ~ icinity during the field s u,- ey atte,, t to the anea·, hi , tori cal use, which is quickly vanis hin g d ue to the e ff ects of urb• n , prawl.

A, of 2004, o n ly fo ur oth er historic· p,, riod refu se sc atters have been reco rd ed in th e G ly of 8dnnini; and it, ,pher,; of influence. a, reported by the Ea s tern Inform a ti o n Ce nter ( TanK e t di. 2004: 8). In comparison to most s ites of thi , type that h ave been recorded in th e so uth e rn Ca li fomja desert region, Site 33- 16208 is remarkab le in that it re tdin s a good level o f integritv and cont ains a varie ty of h ouseho ld cons um er refuse items th a t dMe to the early 20 th century . As su ch , Si te 33- 16208 ma y have th e potential to y it>ld important archaeological data for the s tudy of local history wi th reg. trd tu cumumeri, m and th e lifestyle of early- 20th century agriculturalists in thi s po rti o n of inland ;. ou thcrn Cal ifornia .

Howe ver, the data potentia l- and thus the s ignifi can ce- o f the , it .. canno t 1:-e ascertained witho ut additio nal archaeologica l investigaticms, induding a surface collection oi the diagnostic a rtifact s, s ubs ur face tes tin g to ex plnr<> th f' quantity and quality of the artifac t deposi t, and ana lysis of the reco,· ere d material,. ln order to determine the s igruf1cancc of itc 33- 16208 and its qualification a, a " hi s tori c property" /" hbturical reso urce," a testing phase s tud y "~ II be necessa ry at th e site, as o utlined l>elow.

CONCLUS ION AND RECO M MENDAT IONS
Section 106 of the : slational Ili,toric Prr', f'rvahon Act mandate s that federal agencies take into accmmt the effects o f thei r undt> rtakings o n histo ri c proper ti es and see k wa ys to avoid , minim ize, or mitiga te any adver' St' effects o n su< h properties ( 36 CF R 800. l (a)). Si milarl y, CEQA establishes that " a pr0jec t that may cau se a substantial adverse change in the s ignifi ca nce of a hi s torica l re sourc<' is a projec t that may h ave a s ignifican t effect on the environme nt " ( PR C § 2108J. 1 ). " Sub , tanti al adverse cha n ge;· according lo PR C § 5020_ 1 (4), means d e molition , d .-, tn. u:tion , ,.- locat ion , or alteration such that th e s1gnifican te of a n his torical resource wnuld be impa irt><f."
The p resen t s tud y ha ~ m nclud ed that Site 33- 16207 docs not appear to qualify as a " his tori c prope rt y" o r J " histc, n ca l cesourc<', .. but that the s ig nili ca nce of Site 33- 1620! 1 can no t be de te rmined wit h o 11 t further , tudie,. tl a; cd un thc;, c finding s, CRM TECH recommend s that " n ,1rch, 1 eol u1; kal wstini; and evalu~ tion program be imp lemented on Silt' 33- 16208 p rior to th l:' tumm~- n t-..me nt of th e project. The testi n g and eva luation p rog rdm , huuld con ... t..,t t1f, Ht c1 minimum , lh e fo lJo wing procedures:
22 Preparation o f a rescard1 d esig n;
11rfacP coll ec tin n nf diagnos ti c artifacts;
E,cdva ti on of archaeologica. l test unit~ to Jt:>termine th e subsurface cont(.>nl of the site; Laboratory analysis of artifacts recove re d throu g h the archaeo log 1cal field procedure,; Ca ta loguing and p,,rmanent ru ration. a l an appropriate fa ci lity, of all a rlil acts recowred from the s it e;
Pr epa rati on of a fi n al repor t to summari Le th e findin gs of th e proc.- clur es o utlin ed i.'lbove and lo interpre t such finding::., wit hin th e context of a regional re-;ear ch design.

Furth e r remmm e ndati ons regardi n g th e final trea m1 en t of Site 33- 16208 will be fo rmula ted and pr.- sen te<l 011 the ba s is of th e rE'S ult s of the tes ting an d evalu a ti o n prog ram . No additional r u ltur ,1I reso urces in ves tigation is recommended for th e balance of thl• APE unless projt.> ct plan, 11ndergo su ch cha nges as to include areas not covered by thi s s tud y.

Howeve r, if 1:>uri•"<.I cultur., I materials a re enco unt e rl·d during cons tru ct ion anywhe re wit h.in th e i\l'F, a ll work in that area should be halted or diverted until a qualified archaeologi s t ca n evah1a lf' the nature a nd si gni fican ce of the find ,. 23 1184

REFERENCES
I.Janning Chamber of Commerce
1948 Ba11ni11g, Rii-cr, idc Cormly, Califr11 nia: Tire l lcaltlr City. Pamphlet, Banning Chamber of Cornmerc.:, Barnring.

City o l Banning
1 97fl Flood Insurance Study, City of Banning, Riv"rsid" County. U.S. Department of 1louo; ing and U rban Dl•vdopm1..•nt, F1..~eral lru:.ur."lnce Adminislra lion .

Countv A,sc,..,,or, Riverside
1913'.1919 Real property tax a!>SeSsment records, Book 21, Map 25. \ 1icrofichec; on file.

Riverside County Assessors Office, Riverside.
1920-1925 Real property tax assessment records, Book 21, Map 26. Microfic"hes on file, Riverside Cowity Assessor's Office, Riverside .
1926-1938 Real property tax assessment ri•cords, Book 24, Map 21. Microfiche,, on tile, R1ver,;1de County Assessor's Office, Riwrside.

Eyer, William K.
1984 Ba,mm.~ and San Ct>rxonio Pa <s . W.K. l:.yer, l>anning GLO (General land Office, U.S. D.,partment of the- Interior) lH'il, Plat 'vt,,p: Town,hip No. 3!, outh Kange No. I East, San Bernardino Meridian; surveyt,d in 1852-1855.
ll,';7 Plat \, fop: fownship No. 3!, outh Range No. I West, San Bernardino Meridian; surv<?ycd in 1852-1856.
l880a Pfat Map: Township No. 3 !>outh Range No. J East, San Bernardino Meridian; surveyed in 1852-1879.
1880b l'lat :\1ap : ·1ownship No. 3SoutJ1 Range No. 1 West, San Bt!rnardino Meridian; surveyed in 1852-1880.

Gunther, Jan" Davies
l984 Rfa.,- sirle Co1m ty, Cnlfornin , Pince Name<;: Tlze, r Onsms and The, r Slones . Jcc1nc Davies Lw1ther, Ri\" crside.

Holtzcl.,w, Kenn<'th M.
2005 Jmag,·~ ofAmrrini : Bm111i11g. Arcadia Publishing, San Francisco.

Hugheh, rom
1\136 History o/Bm111i11g a11rl San Gorgouio Pris;_ Bdnning Record l'rint, Banning. lv!ACS
1Y92 lntermo1111/ai11 Antiq111lies Computer Sy,tem (! MACS) User's C11irle; revised edition.

Found at Http :/ h,ww .anthro .ulah.edu / imacs.html.
nning,. Bill. Ron Baker, Tom Palterson, and Diana Seidt'r (ed.) 993 Guide to the Historic Landmarks of R,ue,·s11/e Co,mty , Ca/ifomin. Riverside County Historical Commission Pn>ss, Riverside.

Lehner, Lois
1988 Lehners En,ydapcdia of U.S. M<1rks 011 Pol/cry, /Jorcc/nin & Clay. Coll.,ctor Books, l'aducah, Kentucky.

Messick. P., and M. Dite
200-I Sile record form, CA-RIV-7544 (33-13n9). On file, !,astern information Center, Universlly ol California, R1vers1de.

Press Euteiprise. T/,e
1968 RaJls to Banning in ·n. \ fay 5:08.
1977 Pass· Old CH,e, Drillmg; Cherry V,,Jh:y on CuurSl'. '.\ luvember 27:83. 2-t
Security-Fir.;! Nationdl Bank of Los Angeles, Banning Branch 1955 A111/ It Cnm<' into tfr,, Pa.,,: A Story ofBm111i11g, Cali{vrma. St-curity First National Bank of Lo,, Angdes, Banning.

Tang. Bai "Tom," Michael Hogan. Josh Smallwood, and "Jerri Jacquem,rin 2004 Cultural Resources Tt•chnirul Report, City of Banning General Plan. On file, Fastern Information Center, Univer;itv of Cal ifornia, Riverside.

Tanii;uchi , C., and M. Dice •
200-t Site record forrn, 33- 13778 On fi le, f..:,-..ten1 lniorn1alion Center, Univt.> r~itv of California. Riverside . •
foulouSl', Julian Harrison
1971 Bottle Mak,•rs , md Their Marks. Thomas Nelson, Inc., New York.

USGS (Unitt"1 State5 Gt-ological Survey, U.::i . Departmmt uf the Interior) 1901 Map: San Jacinto, Calif. {30', I :125,000); surveyed in 1897-1898. 1942 Map: Uannini;. Calif. (1;·, 1:62,500); aerial photographs t,1ken in 1939 and 19-ll. 1956 Map: Banning, C ,1lif. (15, 1:62,500); aerial photographs takt!n in 1949 and 1951. 1969 Map: !,an Bern~rdino. C'd\if. (1:250,000); 1958 edition revised. 1979 Map: Santa Ana, Calif. (1:250,000); 1959 edition revised. 1996a Map: Beaumont. Calif. (7.5", 1:24,000); 1953 edition, photoreviscd in 1994. 1996b Map: Cabazon, Calif. (7.5', l :24,000); 19R/! editinn photorevised in 199-t. 25 1185
APP ENDIX 1

PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS
26 Education
1988- 1993
1987
191:! 2
2000
199-1
PRINCIPAi. INVESTIGATOR/ HISTORIAN
Baj • rrom 11 rang, M .A.

G radua le Program in Public I li s tu ry / Hi s tor ic P reservation, UC Rive rs ide.

M.A ., A merican H is tory , Ya le U ni ver,; 1t y, :--:ew H ave n, Co nn~ ctic ut.

B.A., Hi s tory, r'\orthw cs te m U ni ve r~ity, X i 'L111, Chi na .

Int rod uct io n to Section 106 Review ," p n _•..,.. nkd by the Ad visory Co u nc il on Ili s to ric Pr ewrva ti o n and the Uni versity of N.- va d a, Rt>1)0 .

Assel,,', ing th e S ign ificance o f H is toric Arc ha eo lo~ ica l Sit e,,," p resen ted by the Hi s tu ri c Pr t>Se r .-a trnn P rog ram , t; nive rsitv o f Keva d .t, Re no.

Profe ss ional Experience
2002-
1993- 2002
1993- 1997
199 1-1993
1990
1990- 1992
1988-) 993
1985- 1988
1985- 1986
1982- 198. 5
Principal lnve,, li ga to r, C RM ITC H , Rivers id e, Ca lifornia Pro ject H istori a n / Archit ect u ra l Hi s torian, CJ{!,,, 1 fl:L H, J< iwrs id e , C 1h fo rni a.

Pro ject H istori a n, Gree n wood , m d A, socia lcs, l' aci ll c Palisad es, Ca li forn ia .

Project H is torian, J\ rchaeo lo g ira l Resea rch Un it, t;C Rive rsi d e.

Int ern Resea rcher, Cal ifo rn ia S tat e O ff ,ce of H is toric Prese rvation , Sacra m ent o.

T ea chin g Ass ista nt , H is tory of \ fod e m Wo rld , CC Rivers ide.

Resea rch As. sis tant , A m erican Soci al l lis to ry, t.:C Ri ve rs id e.

Research Assis t,mt , Modern C hinese Iti ; tu rv, Ya le L: ni ve rsity .

T eaching A ssis tan t, :\1odc rn C hin es.- Hi • tll ry, Ya le U n iversity .

Lect u re r, H is tory, Xi 'an 1-o rcign Lan g u,1 ge, Insti tute , Xi' a n, C hi n a.

Honor.; and Award s
1'188 - 1990
l <l85 - l 9B7
1980, 1981
Univcr~ ity o f C1liforni, 1 Grad u a te f.e ll ows hi p, UC Rive rs ide .

Ya!~ U ni vcrs itv Fellows h ip, Yd i e U ni , e rsi ty Graduate Schoo l.

Prcsi, i~nt 's I Juno r I ist , i':o rt hw .. s te m Uni \' el", i ly, Xi' an. China .

Cullural Resources Manai; ement Reports
Prc- Hminary Ana ly ~~ and RP<"omn1enda tion s Regarding Ca lifornia 's Cultural Reso urces ln vt' ntory Sys km ( Wi th Spt, e idl Rderen ce lo Co ndi tion 14 of NPS 1990 Prog ra m Rc• v icw Report ). Cal iforn ia State Offi ce o f I list uric Pre,; e rva tio n 1, o rk ing pape r, Sacra m e nt o , Sep te m ber 1990 .
un1cr ous culhual resource-.; m anage m ~nt repor ts wi th th e A rchaeo logica l Resea rch Ll ni t, Greenwood and As socia t.,,, an d CRM T FCTI , , ince Oct1> be r 199 1.

Membership
California Pre,; erva ti o n f.o un da tion .
27 1186
Educalion
1991
1981
1980-1981
2002
2002
2002
1992
1992
PRINCll' AI INVl:.~, I IGATO l{/AJ< C HAEOLOG IST
Michael Hoga n , Ph .D., RPA '
Ph.D ., Anthropology, lJnivPrsity of Cal ifornia, Riverside.

B.S., AHthrupolugy, Cniv.-rsity uf Califumid, Riwr,idt'; with honors.

Ju ca tiun Abroad Prug, ran,, Lima, Pt.·Tu .

Section 106- Nation3l Historic Preservation Act federal Law at the Local Level, UCLA Extension Course ~888.

Recognizing Historic Artifacts," workshop presented by Richard l\:orwood, Historic,11 Archaeologist.
wending Your Way lhrough the Regulatory ~ dLe," symposium pre~nted bv the Association ot Cnviron rnentdl Pro fe.,<:,ional."-1. outhern Calitornia Cerdmics Wurk,,hop," prc,wntcd by Jerry Schader.

Historic Artifad Workshop," pres<ented by AnnP Duffield -Stoll.

Professional Experience
2002-
19'19-2002
1996-1998
1()()2-1998
l992-199j
lll93-1994
1991-1992
1984-1998
Principal Im e~tigator, CRM TEU I, Riverside, California.

Projett Archaeologist / Field Director, CRM TECH , Riverside .

Project Dir.-ctur and Ethnographer, Statistirnl Research, Inc., Redlands.

A,,btant Research Anthropologist, University of California, River,ide Project Dir.-ctor, Archaeoloi;ical Research Unit, t_;_ C. Riverside.

Adjunct Profes.!oor, Rive1-sidc Community College, Mt. San Jacinto College, U.C. Riverside, Chapman University, and San Bernardino VallPy College.

Crew Cltiet, Archcteological Research Coil, U. C. River;ide.

Archaeolugirnl lechnician, Field Director, and Project Director for various southern California cultural resources management firms.

R.-, earch lntl' rests
Culh1r.tl l<Psuurct' \1anagement, Southern Californian Arcl,at>ology , Settlement and F.change Patterns, Specialization and Stratification, CulturP Change, Native American Culture, Cultural Oiversity .

Cultural Resources Management Reports
u tho r and ro-a ulhor ot, con tributor to, dnd principal inve' iti ga tor for nu m erous cultural resources management study reports , inet• 1\186.

Memberships
Rcf!,islcr of ProJcssionoJ Archaeo lu,,;bt-,.

Society for 1\mcrican Archaeology.

Society for California Arch.,eulut,y.
l'acitic Coast Archaeologic..11 Soc,ety.

Coachella V,11ley Archateol~ical Society.
28 Education
1998
1997
19%
199.J
1993
1992
19'-N2002
2001
2000
1998
1997

PROJECT ARCHAEOLOGIST/REPORT WRITER
Josh Smallwood, B.A.

8.A , Anthropology, HumboldtState University, Arcata, California.

Archaeological Field School, fort Russ Ili ~toric District. rort Ross, CJlifornia.

J\rchat•olugical Field School, Coastal Te,t and \ 1itigalion Projecb, Arcata, Califorrtia.

Archaeological Field School, Mad River Watt•r,hed Surveys, Blue Lake, California.

A.A., Anthropology, PalornJr College, San .\-larcos, C11ifurni a.

Archaeolog1cal Field School, S• n Pdsqual Balllelid d , San Pasqudl, California.

Arch.ieological Field ~chool , I.a~ Flore« A<istencia, Camp Pendlt:to,1. CA.

ArchaPological rield School, Palomar College Campus Late Prehistoric Sites, San Maren,, California.
fatPnsive study ol lithic resourcte procurement strategies, reduction technology, tool manufacture, and reproduction.

Ili,torical Archaeology Workshop," prPsented by Richard Norwood , Ba~ A"h "eologist. EdwardsAir 1-orce Base.

CEQA and Sectinn 106 Basics,'· presented by Richard Carrico, Principal lnwstigatur, Brian F. Mooney &: Associate;., S.,n Dit:go.

OSHA Saft:ty Training for Construction Monitor,,'" presented bv ChHA and City of San Diego.

HABS / HAFR RPCording Methods for Historic Stmctures; pre,ented by J{obert Case, Hbtoric Archaeologist, :'vlooney & Associates, San Diego.

L.:ncxploded Ordinan , e Trami11g," presented by EOD officers, Fort Irwin Army Iraining Facility, Barstow .

Obsidian Sourcing thruui;h O ,aracterization;· presented by Thomds Origer. onoma State Uni,·ersity .

Profossional Exp,;,rience
2002-
1997-2002
l'roject Archaroloi;ist /Rcpurt Writt'r, CRM TECH , Riverside, California .

Writer / co-author of cultural re~ ur(e n •i,orts for BL:'vl, FCC, and Caltransreview , city g~neral p lans, commerc ial. and n.--,jd cntid l tl l;'."velopmenl pro,ecti;.

Field director, archaeological field work , histnric-prrind bu,ldiug surveys and r..-cordation, historical archaeologist, and lithic analysis.

IJ,storimt research ba~ on published literature, historic maps, oral interview s, rountv and cilv archi val record s, inten1ct w urcc::,, an d cun ,ultatiun with. loc,11 lustortcal societies.
rchaeolugi..,t fur -.eve rdl cultu ral r~ urce n1anagemenl /environn1cnt'1l wns'"1ltan1,, o.,partrn.,nt of Defense subcontractors, and Humboldt Stale Lniversity.

Cultural Resources Management Reports
Co-author of and contributor tu nunwruus CEQA and Section 106 compliance studies since 1997.
29 1187
1CRMTECH
To:

FAX COVER
f:iil:Jil
1016 E. Cooley Drive,
Suites A-8
Collon, CA 92324
909·824 ·6400 ·Tel
90' 1·824 ·6405 ·FH
tjy~nu• rican
Ile ritagt-' lornm i~~ion
Fax.
9lo) 657 5390
frum:

Laura Henslcv Shaker
ate:
lune I1. 2007
umber of page, ( includini lhi-,
C'O\l'I -.h<.'1.·ll.

L
lfi\ RD CO /> Y:

Ill folio\, by m.111
r ,,· 111 not follO\-. unit:-=,-.
reque--led
I
RE : Sacr,:,d I and records search
This is lo request a Sacrl?d Lands records !>Carch
Name of project:

Banning WWTP
CRM TECI I 112083
location:

In the City of Banning
Riverside Counly
USGS 7.5' quad sheet data:

Bl'aumont & Cabazon, Calif.,
Sections 8-11, 14 -18, TJS RIE, SBBM
Please call if you net-d more information or ha,·e any
questions.

Results may be faxed to the number above.

I appreciale your assistance in this mailer .

Map inrtuJrd
Anthony). i\ndrt•<1s, Jr.
3022 \,V Nicolet Street
Banning, CA 92220
RE : Banning WIVIT
In the City of Banning, Riversid<• County
CRM TECH Contract ,;2083
Dt'.tr \+tr. Am.lre.:.i~:

June 13, 2007
CRM TFC! I h rnmlucting a cultural resources studv for thP projtect referenced above. In the meantime, Iam writing to request your input on potential :-.;., tive Am.,rican cultural rl~oura.-s in or near the proj.,ct area. Please rc--spond at your earliest convenience if you have any spccitic k.nowk•dge of s.icred / religious sites or other sites of f\:ative American traditional cultural valot' within or near the project area that we should be aw.ire of. The lead agency for this projt-ct i; the City of Banning for CEQA compliance purposl'S. fhe project is locilted in the City of Be.1umont, Ri verside County . The accompanying mJp, based on the USGS Beaumont and Cah,,7on, Calif., quadrangles, depicts the location of the APEinScctionsS-11 and 14- 18, T35RlF,S8BM.

Any information. concerns or recommendJtions regarding cultural resources in the vicinity of the project area may be forwan:kd to CRM TECI I by telephone, e-mail, facsimile or standard mail. !" hank you for the time and t•ffurt in c1dd res.sing this important matter. l{espectfully,
Laura Hensley Shaker

CRMTECH
Encl .: Project area n1ap
1188
06 1 1! 12007 14. 13 PA.I 9U 857 5390 NAIIC
SIATUlf.~ IFCZ' I~ A.mot:; iltl!IG'fZmc;·

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION
91S Cll "" 1' ll. U& I I_ NOOQ ) f;,I.

SACAAl! ltHTO, CA «. 61'
t'l')UH25t
Fa(tt1JW7-: il"l0
Wllb Si' 8~' 1Ql
itt: m _uhdtp&ebellN! t
Laura Ilenstey Shaker

CR M TECH
1016 E Cooley Drive. Suite B
Colton, CA 92324
Sent by FAX to : I00-824 -6405
t.umt) ar Of Pa\l•• • 2
June 1 1. 2007
p,.,_.. d Banr;ng W,/1/f p CR M TECII # 208~1. R1vt1s1de Coun:y Dear Ma . Hensley ShakR<
Ttwt Nahve American t._'ltage CCmm1uK>nwas. abl9 t, perform ,. l"F!n}td search of rts Sacred Land• F,lo (SLF) fm lhe a!l,iclf,(j project area The SLF fa,led to oo< tate uie pr,senc,, of N.:atnn:! Am~ ICiln cultu ral reiwurcea in th e imme. diate projK- 1.orea. The absenceohpeci fic site information in lhe Sacl'ed La.."tds Fi1e doe.s i'\Ol guarar. te.e tht absence or cuttoraJ resources in uny area ot potential effect ( AP!:) '
Ea, ty consJltaticn with NiJtive Atneik; an lribes , n your art! r.1 is the cest · 11 ~y to avokS u11a. 1ticipa: itd discovefiits once a prO) ttt Is unde rv-.·ay. Er, clos. ed are \ he neateit tribt'! S thal may have ~ ge of c:ulb.' fiil l resources in the prqcct aro: a A List of Naeve Amorican ~ t:\S 3re r1ttr1Chec1 to a~•&I )<OtJ The Com1TltSSIOfl makes no r~om!T'endation of a single indY.cJual or gmup over anothc~ It 1$ ..: tYts. abfe to contact the person H2! d; rf tncy eanrot supp' y you w ith speciflc 111formahon about~ Impacl on cuttural resources , u, ey rr.ay be able lo ,efer you to anctner tnbe or ccriOfl \ nowledge, ible or lhe cultura l = urces rn or r. car ! he affected p rojecl area ( APFJ I ock of S4 1rf~~ ~,<!enca ot ~rtheo!og:c:tl resources does not pl' eclude tne existence of Ycheolog!C:11 , .. 01,.,,,. I.ea<! ~ncres shou a corsoder avotd3nce. as defi~ in Socx,11 15370 of California ~ ronrncntal Ouafity Act (<': F.OAJ wt-l'!n s.,omfr..Jtnt f".ultural rosources couJd be affcclcd by a ptoJect Al,; o Pl! bw.: R"' sourccs Code Secbon 5097 . 98 :: md Health & s~ fety CorlP.

S. c·bon 7050 Sprovide tor P, ov• s. ont for acctdentaPy d,scovc•.- ct archoob~ I nr. J<>Urces du, Klg co n.. .. tructiori and .,, a~ t1; 1:c- tho processc:. : o ht> fnllrY. vod in tf-.e event or an itCCld& ntal diteove, y of any htJ rr.an remains in a :> toJKl locaoon o; he· t,ar, a ' ded Cited ce mete()' Discussion or these shoukt b~ mc. lude< l lfl )'OUJ eovirO'lf"lentaJdOC\ltr.ents, as appropoate at>oi..l lntS re5pon~ to your re<Juest ple..;se do ll01 hesitate to At:. achmr. r,t N: a:·Ne A.mencan Conbct List
00 1 ( lft /! 2 1 , 00i t ~:14 l-.'\.l UHi 6Si S: 190
Cahuijfa Band of Indians
N.\IIC
Native Americen Conlacls
Riverside County
June 11. 2007
Motongo Band of Mission ln<fians
lillooz
Anthony Madrigal , Jr., lmerim- Chairperson Britt W. Wilson, Cultural Re, sources- Project Manager P .O. Box 391760 Cahuilla
Anza , CA 92539
tribalcouncil@cahuinanot
95 1) 763-? 631
951) 763- 2632 Fax
Ramona Band of Mission Indians
Joseph Ilamilton , vice chairman
P.O. Box 391670 Cahuilla
Anza , CA 92539
admin @ramonatribc . oorn
951) 763-- 4105
95 1) 703- 4325 Fax
Anthony J . Andreas , Jr.
3022 w. NiCOlet Street
Banning , CA 92220
95 1) 849- 3844
Cahu illa
Santa Rosa Band ot Mission lndians
John Marcus , Chai m,a n
P 0 . Box 609 Cahui lla
Hemet . CA 92546
srtribaloffice @aol . com
95 1) 658 -5311
95 1) 6! xH> 733 Fax
Th-. I~ hl. cu, 11! 11' 11only a. aof ~ CSPt' Qf 0\ 11 dOCUffl(' t'd_ 49750 Seminole Drive Cahuilla
Gabazon , CA 92230 Serrano
britLWll90n@mororgo Otg
951) 755- 5206
951 ) 755- 5200/ 323- 0822- cell
951) 92243146 Fax
Cahuilla Band ol Indians
Maurice Chacon. Cuttural Resources
P.O. Box 391760 Cahutlla
Anza , CA 92539
cbandodian@aol. com
951) 763- 2631
951 ) 763- 2632 f:,x
Dbtr1bu1: k>a uf ltdtl 1101 000. niot ~-., Pff90n of . aa& u'° ry n!' llpurwll, lllty -( h..- lltw, i lo Soi; dOr\ 705CL5 ot U' IC HUll1h ..-. S s. tet,~. s.d:loft5097.NoflhePublc~~ .. nd~! iml' Jlllof~~~ ~ Tl-ff btl:a CMVJ" lllpplkablotoJconllictlru klc:al ,_,"' 6~_. ,..,.,10mtl.WN ~ tor tte~ BAnnJngWWTP( CRIITC. CH120G) IIDC: Med' tnlhc c-, ofDannlng;~ e~. CIIINt, n,, I,. -.. wflldaaSW: Ndi unde.....,~ .... ~
1189
Subject: City of Banning WWTP
Date: Wednesday, June 13 , 2007 3: 38 PM
From: Britt Wilson < [email protected]>
To: Laura Hensley -Shaker < laura.shaker@crmtech .us >
Cc: Britt Wilson < britt _wilson@morongo .org>
Conversation: City of Banning WWTP
Laura.

Thank you for contacting the Morongo Band of Mission Indians concerning the City of Banning's proposed WWTP project.

Due to the proximity of the site to the extensive Red Hands Village Site (RIV-57) and rock art (RIV-5847) and adjacent Smith Creek, the Tribe believes the site of the actual plant is In a h1gh-probabilIty area for cultural resources and we recommend an archaeological site monitoring plan for the plant area . Al least one monitor should be Native American provided by Morongo under contract to the City/contractor. The Tribe also asks that ii be invited lo any pre-construction meeting .

Thank you for considering our comments.

Sincerely.

Britt W Wilson
Project Manager - Cultural Resources
Morongo Band of Mission Indians
Casino Morongo Building
49750 Seminole Drive
Cabazon ,CA 92230
Office: (951) 755 -5200 Direct: (951) 755-5206
Mobile : (951) 323-0822
Fax: (951) 922-8146 E-mail ; Britt_wilson@morongo .org
Wayta' Yawn' ( a lw; J ys believe)

RAMONA BAND OF CAHUJLLA
56310 t1ighway 371, Suite fl
Post Office Box 3 9 I 670
Anza, California 92539
July 5, 2007
u,u1a Hensle~ Slwl<cr
R.\t Tech
10!6E Co! ley l:>i ivc, Suite 13
foltm~ CA 92324

A SOVEREIGN NATION'
Tel : (951) 7G3-4 I05
ra" 1951 ) 763-- 4325
E- mail: admi n@ ramonalrib e. com
Ttt: Banniug W'rll'; C:R:\1 Tec: h Con1raet # 2083
Dear Ms Shakci
1nc R..rnon: i Band ofCahudla Indians apprec iates the opportunity lo consu lt with you , egarding the proposal proJu. 1 hstcd alxwc and mentioned in your lune 13. 2007 lener. be Ramona Band ofC.,ahwlla Indians is roncernal about the protection ofunique and incplace2~lc cu lniral rc< 0urces, such a< Calu,illa ,·illag,' • nJ bunal sites and archaeological items that ma) be disp laced bv ground-disturb:ng W<' rk assouatcd w11h any project ¼ ithin the aborigina l h<,r.icla.nd s <' f the Cahuilla pa•plc
Tiie Ramona Band of Cahuilla Indians is also concerned about the proper and lawful ucauneot ofa.1y a ihural or ceremonial ltems, N aLive American human remain s. or sacred itemc. di"'COvercd during pla nnin ~ andior ooni;' lructioo of the project
At thistime, tbe Ramona Band ofCahuilla lncfia:is h.15 no inform,,;ion to p1ovidc rcgrudmg culcural csources that ITl3). be located wnlun che project area Hm, cv~-r, the Ramona Iland ofC. h·.iilla Indians resen·es the ,ight to provide co mment , rcgrudiug the Pro: ect upm, ,cview ofthefindingsofthe culrur.d resources assessment for the subject property. l1c:;ist' fo!', urd acopy oftheculuual 1cw wcc, stud) rm'- cstigaaon of the alx,ve referenco: I rr.operty 10 1tic address. liM.ed abc,i.·e The Ramona Band of Ca hu1lla bdian s appreciate.; the oppo rtunity 10 consult 1cga1c1r. g the p1 opooed proiecr
Sincere~,.
9~
Jolu, A G!'me7, Jr
ulturnl Rcsourr.es Coordinato,
Ra111011a Band of Cahmlln Indian.;
RECEI VE!; '. cl~ ! I 1llii?
1190

TELE PHO NE LOG
Name TTibe/Affilialion Phone
Anthony Andrea, C:ahuilla June 22, 2007; 3:10 pm
June 26, 2007; 1:35 pm
Anthon y :,,,,adrigal, Cahuilla Band of Non~
Jr . Indians
Maurice Chacon, Cahuilla Band of June 22, 2007; 3:20pm
Cultural Re~ urccs Indians June 26, 2007; 4:15pm
Coord, nalor June 27, 2007; 2:10pm
Britt Wilson, Morongo Band of None
Environmentdl ~~ ion lndldn~
Coordinator -
Joseph Ii.l,11,lton, RdriiurwBd11j of Nun~
Vitc-Cl1, 1innt111 Ct1hui] I.- Mb:,iun
Indian,;
John Gome,, Jr ., Ramona Band of June 22. 2007; 3:23pm
Cullurtll RL·...ourc~ C,1hui lla Mic; c; ion Jun,' 26, 2007; 4:20pm Coordinator lndianc;
John Marruc;, Santa Ros; i Band o f None
Chairman M1c;.c;ion lndi.Jnc,
jAndrea C-andellana, Santa Rosa Band of June -22, 2007; 3:30pm l'ribal Reeteptionisl 1'.1ission Indians
I
Comments
No an~Wer. phom~ 1X' r
disconncct1;; d
MaurireCh, 1con wil l
respond on behalf of thC"
lribe .

Left messag.- s; no r..-sponsc
to date .

An <"-mail wac. rffC' l\;;a--
from Mr. Wilson on Jun.-
13, 2007. ( Lupv dtldched)
John Gome , responded on
behalf of the tribe . ( See
b<,low)

1.r. Gome7 responded in a
leller dated July 5, 2007
Copy atta cht"< l)

1.Am.Jr~d Cilndellaria
re, pond-, d on behalf of lhe
Tribe. ( Se,· brlow)
Andrea Canclellaria ., lated
that th~ Trilx- had no·
specific concerns at thic;
lime regarding lhe project
ue. l bur would reserve the
nghl to be no11f1<' d of any
cultural rewurces
disrov<' red during
ground - d, slurbmg
acti vity.

A PP EN DI X 3

SITE RECORDS
Confidential)
39 1191

APPENDIX D
Biological Resources Survey Report
Biological Survey Report:

City of Banning Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion and Phase I Recycled Water System
The City of Banning proposes to expand its 3_8 mgd wastewater treatment plant ( WWTP) and construct a recycled water storage and distnbulton system m accordance with the Banning Recycled Water Master Plan . The capacity of the existing WWTP on approximately 126 acres of land , would expand from 3.6 mgd to 5_ 1 mgd. The addttional 1 5 mgd capacity would include an advanced treatment process using a Membrane Bioreactor { MBR) to produce recycled water . The MBR treatment process would satisfy State of Califomra Department of Health Se, vices ( OHS) n1e 22 waler qualtty requirements without filtration . Expansion of the treatment plant would occur primanly on approximately 16 acres of undeveloped land west of the existing WWTP . Expansion of the WWTP and insta llation of a recycled water s.ystem would necessitate ground disturbance at three locations:

From an existing. capped water weU ( Well R1 ) northeast of the WWTP to the existing WWTP ; A 9 5--acre undeveloped field invnedlately west of the existing WWTP : and .

Along paved streets between lhe WWTP on the eastern ., de of tuwn and Su nset Avenue on the west side of Banning , and between Sunset Avenue and the eastern side of the Sun Lakes residential development
Survey Techniques
On April 4, 2007 . Mr. John Moeur, Terrestrial Ecologist and Pnncipat Scientist ( Parsons), examined the proposed sites for the various components of the WWTP expansion and recycled water system . A broad characterization of the pr0Jecl boological study area was deemed sufficient initially, rather than quantolative descriptions derived from systematic sampling techniques For these reasons , a pedestrian survey was combined with windshield obse, vations , as appropriate.

The site of Well R1, the undeveloped field , and a diagonal route between Sunset Avenue and Westward Avenue were walked Other project components could be seen adequately from a slow- moving vehicle.

The study area includes approximately 1.3 acres ( 0_54 hectares [ hi) around the site of Well R1 , 9 5 acres ( 3 .83 h) of vacant field jull west of the treatment planl about 14 3 acres ( 5 _78 h) along the diagonal between Sunset Avenue and Westward Avenue. The proposed alignment for the recycled water pipeline is composed of various paved streets with momma! to no biological value , as any plants were growing through asphalt pavement.

Formally Protected Species
Records kept by Califom, a Department of F,sh and Game ( CDFG) as the Cafdomia Natural Oivers, ly Database ( CNDDB) ( 2003) reflect previous biological collections and observations that display collection locales_ Such inforrnat! Ofl can indicate land areas possibly still inhabited by protected species _ The United States Fish and Wildlife Service ( USFWS) identified 16 federally protected species known to inhabit locales in the general region of the City of Banning ( see attached letter dated September 14, 2007)_ With the exceptoon of Stephens kangaroo rat and mountain yellow- legged frog, none of these species occur any closer than 3 mijes from the project site ( most are known only from very considerably farther away than 3 moles from the project site)
Stephen' s kangaroo rat ( Dipodomys stephenso), of the rodent ( Family Heteromyldae) Is listed as endangered by lhe USFWS and threatened by the CDFG Stephen" s kangaroo rat generally occurs in annual and peren nial grasslands dominated by brome grasses and frtaree, but has also been found to inhabit sparse coast. I sage scrub , scrub mixed with chamise. or sagebrush plant assemblages This 0 -1
1192
small mammal prefers areas with well-< Jrained , gravelly or sandy soil for dlgging their buHows , but will also burrow in firm soils Stephen' s kangaroo rat has been recorded on the Five Bridges housing site Yellow- legged frog ( Rana mucosa). a true rrog ( Family Ranidae) is hsted by the USFWS as endangered , but does not have formal listing by the CDFG This species always occurs very near water The ranee { CNDDB EOlndex Nt 42456) which maps within 0 .:1.5 mile ol lhe study area is from a collect, on made in 1925 at a vaguely deocnbed locale The species possibly has bee n exti rpat ed from th,s locale .

The mapped occurrence ( shown as 1.0 mile on radius) would intersect the proiect study area only along Lincoln Street at aboul San Gorgonio Ave nue.

Sensitive Spec ies
In the extent of the proiect study area between well R1 on the eastern side of Banning and the Sun Lakes residential development on the west . CNDDB records show loca les of seven other species thought to be declining in their abundance or being res tricted from their historic range Whi le most have been termed California Spec, ea of Conce rn , none has formal status under ellher lhe fed eral or lhe ~ talfl Endangered Species Act These seven species are · Yucaipa omon ( A/hum marvmt~, Plummer' s manposa lily ( Ca/ochortus p/ummerae) northwestern San Diego pocket mouse ( Chaetcxjjpus fa/lax fa/11))(), mesa horkeha ( Hon<.eha cwrttata puoerulal , Los Ange les pocket mouse ( Perognathus ong ,membns brovrnasus) western spadefoot toad ( Spoa hammond1J), and the Amencan badger Taxtdea laxus)
TwelVe add1t, onal sens~ ive spec, es were reported ( Impact Sciences, 2006) from the weste rn port10n of the present • Judy area during b10logical surveys conducted tor the Five Bridges residential development.

CNDD B archives do not record these species in this geographic area ( not an uncommon circumstance) Moot are birds of special concern · Coope~ s hawk ( Accip, ter cooperi1), sha rp-shinned hawk ( Acc, piler stnalus). BeH's sage sparrow ( Amphtsp, za beHr), golden eagle ( Aquila chrysaelos). burrowing owl AI/Je11e cumcularia), California homed lark ( Eremophlla a/pesltis ad/ a), northern harrier ( Circus cyaneus), and loggerhead shrike ( Lsnius / udovicianus). Two mammals and two reptiles were also idenltl1ed· the pallid San Diego pocket mouse ( Chaelodipus la#ax pal/idus), San Doego black- tailed jack rabbi! ( Lepus ca/ifom, cus bennellll). coasta l western whiptaIl ( Asptdoscelis tigns stejnegen). and coast San Diego horned lizard ( P/1ryr1osoma coronatum blainvitlet), respectively .

Site for We ll R1
The Well R1 site , approximately 1.3 acres in size within the Banning WWTP property fence line, has been partially clea red . The ground around Well R1 has been scraped ftat. An existing dirt road provides access IO percolatIon ponds and Well R1. The well' s cas,ng protrudes from the ground at coordinates t 1S 0514386E 3753048 N ( UTM NAD 1983). Although the dirt road is hei!Vlly traveled , lhls area is charactenzed by presence of buckwheat ( Enogonom / ascicu/ atum), filaree { Erodium sp ). and mustard Brassies sp ) Lark sparrow ( Ch011destes grammacus). western kingbird ( Ty,annus vert/ ca/1s), k1lldee1 Charadrius vocife, ous). and jack ra bbit ( Lepus ca/ifomicus) were observed on April 4, 2007 These jack rabbrts may belong to the sensitive subspec, ea ( L ca /1fomicus bennettil) given this location and occurrence& just a few miles west a1 recorded by C NDOB Smatl burrcroNs west of the well may be used by pocl< et mouse species The area may polentially serve as habitat for three other species considered sensitive by lhe Califomra Natural Diversity Data Base ( CNDDB): palhd San Diego poclo. et mouse, Los Angeles pocket mouse and coast San Diego horned hzard None of these three California Species of Special Concern ( C SC) were observed on Apnl 4. 2007
Undeveloped Field West of WWTF
The proposed expans, on site west of the existing Banning WWTP is generally Ila!, about 9.5 acres in size, and was planted with domesfic ol ive trees as hedgerows ( Olea curopaca) along two sides of the field The property Is mowed twice yearty Vehteular traffic along a penmeter road rnto the Banning Animal Shelte r crosses the parcel near I1s southern boundary. Plants found on the site inclu de California croton ( Croton ca/ifomicus), musta rd , yellow fiddleneck ( Amsinck, a sp.), sun cup ( Camissoma sp.) and annua l grasses Common raven ( CotVus corax), American crow ( CoNus brochyrhynchos).

D-2
and numerous burrows dug by California ground squ irrel ( S/}fimrophi/ us beecheyi} we re observed on the site on April 4, 2007 . No burrowing owls were seen flying or posting on dirt mounds on April 4, 2007 , and no ground squirrel burrow had indired evidence of burrowing owls that may inhab it th is site.

Pipe lin e Route Along Paved Residential Streets
The propased recycled waler pipeline corridor from the Banning 1/1/WrP lo Sunset Avenue would be construded entirely on paved surfaces. prima rily in residential areas . A natural gas pipel ine and water oupply line are located beneath Lincoln Street ( and other streets along this route). Annual, introduced grasses were visible in vacant areas between houses , as were ground squirrel burrows. No species but hose common lo urban areas were noted .

Alignment Along Westward Avenue
The proposed recycled water pipe line corridor from Sunset Avenue to the Sun Lakes housing area would be constructed on a gravel surface compri sing the extension of Westward Avenue. This access road experiences frequent vehicular traffic and bisects the proposed Five Bridges housing property.

Although a corridor south of the ro adway is fenced , this property is used for catlle grazing . urnity lines gas and fibe r optics) are localed on the north side of Westward Avenue, with an aboveground, suspended sewage pipe crossing to the south side of lhe roadway near Smith Creek. A series or bridges provide the roadway over the large wash . Wildlife observed on Apnl 4, 2007 included Say' s phoebe ( Sayomis soya), mourning dove ( Zenaida macroura), European starling ( Slumi,; vulgaris), Brewer' s blackbird ( Euphagus cyanocepha/ us), crow, raven , and turkey vu lture ( Cathartes aura).

Although evidence of pocket gopher ( Thomomys bo/lae) was observed, the dirt shoulders of the road contain no biological resources of concern.

Undeveloped land north of Westward Avenue was surveyed for the Five Bridges res ident ial development, and evidence of Stephens' kangaroo rat were observed there. CNDDB records also show areas mapped as inhabited
by D. stephensi ( Fig . 1). A
possible route across this
currently undeveloped
acreage was examined on
April 4, 2007 looking
particularly for bunows
probably dug by heteromyid
rodents. Four such burrows
were found. All are in the
general vicinity of mapped
local distribution of
Stephen' s kangaroo rat ( Fig.
1 ). No sign of burrowing
owls was found anywhere
along the diagonal
alignment. A cluster of large
gums trees ( Euca/yp/11s
sp .), mature willows ( S;,/ix
goodingi1), and mula fat
B8ccharis sa/isifolia) grows
where this diagonal route
would cross Pershing Creek .

The grove of trees
constitutes an island of
arboreal habitat in an
fig . 1. Location of four burrows ( yellow Xs) close lo a diagonal roul9 ( blue) across undeveloped land nonh of VVestward Avenue. Irregu lar polygon ( ora nge) shows land occupied by Stephen'$ kangaroo ret. as recorded by CNODB.

Magenta oval denotes large b'ees populated by a variety of bird species. otherwise spare tract. A number of bird species were present and adive ! here at mid- day. Tracks of several native mammals species were also se-en there.

D-3
1193
This diagonal route should be avoided in favor of the nort h shoulde r of Westward Avenue between Sunset Avenue and the Sun Lakes Developme nt The diagonal route 1s not being considered fo r the n, cycled water pipeline at this time
Conclusion
Two federally listed species and eighteen sensitive species have been recorded h1stoncally in the general v1cm11y of the proposed recycled water pipeline and water treatme nt facilities as proposed by the Cijy of Banning No listed species were evident in the project study area where proposed trenches woukt be excavated . The site of the water treatment facility west of the existing plant has no stgns of any species of concern.

Installation of pipelines along existing roads would have no adverse consequence to any listed species or California species of special concern _
No need for forma l coordmat, on with agencies would arise as al l effects of ground distu rbance would occur 1n e~her existing paved streels through residentia l neighborhoods of Bann ing, alon g the manufactured and maintained shoulders of compacted gravel roads used regula ~ y for operational purposes . or on a vacant tract of land adJacent to the exiting treatment facility _ As no foreseeable adverse affects wou ld be anticipated , no mrt. 19at10n would be required to compens. ate for projl! Ct effects to biological resources .

Bibliography
California Department of Fish and Game, Biogeog raphic Data Bra nch . 2003. Californi a Natural Diversity Database ( CNDDB) RareF1nd, comme rcial vers ion 3 _ 1.0, Febru a,y 2007 Impact Sciences , Inc . 2006 _ Draft Environmenta l Impact Report ( EIR) Five Bndges Specd1c Plan.

November.
0- 4
011/ 14 /% 0 07 10 : 38 M l 7809_ 1806_38 LS liSU AND ~ ILDLI FE United States Department of the Interior

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
ID R, ply 11. ef .. To:

FWS-WRIV -S469. I
Rosemarie Crisologo
Pmoos
100 W . Walnut Street
P:tsadc: na. California 91124
Ecological St!TI< ..

Carlsbad Fitb ml Wildlife Oflioe
6010 Hidda! Valley Road
Catlsbld, Califotnia 92011
SEP 14 ' JJ1JI
1;!1002
Subj : Species List for the Proposed Waste Warer Trealmml Plant .ExpllllSion and Phase I Recycled Water System, City ofBannmg, Riverside County, California.

Dear Ms. CriliOlogo:

This letter is in response IO your written n:quC31, , eceivcd on September 05, 2007, for infonnali011 on fcde"' 1.ly cndan~ threatened, proposed, and candidate species that occur in lhe vicinity of the proposed wastewater treatment c:,q,ansion and recycled water system that includes pipelines, pumps, a skimmer, and • toragc n:scrvoin. The proposed project is located in the City ofBIIMing at 2242 East Charles Street and Ul<lludcs a pipeline that would be con& tructed west along O>arlcs Street, north on Hathaway Street, west on Lincoln Street, iouth lo an unpaved access road laminating at the Sun Lakes housing dcvelopmcnl To assist you in evaluating the potential occumru:e of federally Listed endangm, d, threatened, propo• ed. and und. idate species that may occur in the vicinity of the a, ea identified. we are providing the eoclosed list.

The proposed project is located within lhe plan area for the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Con= vation Plan ( MSHCP). The MSHCP provides for ! he long- term OOlllCl'Vation and managomcnt of habitat for many federally listed and sensitive species in the n:gjon while authorizing certain impacts to these species. The City ofBanning is signatory to the MSHCP, and therefore, will need lo conduct this projoct consistent with the pro~ uions ofthe MSHCP.
lflhe proposed project is authoriud, funded, or earned out by a Federal agency and may affect a listed spcciet, thenthe Fedcnl agency mll! I COIIJU! t with us, pursuant to section 7 of the Endangen: d Species Act of 1973 ( Act), as amended ( 16 U .S.C 1531 er uq).

Although we have provided a Ii 51 of federally listed endangered, threatened. proposed, and candidate • pecios tbal may occur in the vicinity of the proposed action, we do Mt have sitespecific information for the project area. Tberefure, we JCCOmmend that project proponents seek assistance from a biologist fanuliarwith the habit. al conditions and associaled spc,c:ies in o.nd arowid the proposed project site lo assess the actual potential for r:lircct, indirect wt cumulative impacts likely to result from the proposed activity.

TAKE PRIDE"._,~
INAMERICA~
1194
09 / 14 / 2007 I 0 , 37 FAl 7& 09180& 38 rs FISH Al\'D __ Wl!-l>_LIF!< ROJem81' ie Crisologo ( FWS -WRIV- 5469. 1)
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Kathleen Pollett of thi• office at 760) 431- 9440, extension 357.

Sincerely,
Ot!L&-5LJ--U-L
J... Karen A. Goebel
fJ Assistant Field Supervisor
enclosure
filOOl
0D / 1412007 L0 :37 Fil 7809180838 US flSll A.~D 1'11.DLl~'E li! 004 Federally Ead 111Ued, TllrHlfted. Pr<1pc,Hd, ud Cudidate Specks ud Critical Habitat 1• 1 May O. a, r lD ~• Vicinity of tbe City ofBaulna WWTI' . Explllloll ud Pbue I Recycled Waler System, RiY.... W. Couty, Calllonla
September 14, 2007
Comm.on Name Sc: ie tir.c Nuee Feder! Statas Crltkal lllll>ltat ill Vlcualty
c,. w,«w
Riverside fairy shrimp Strtpr« q,halus ,..,., rrolli endangered vernal pool fairy shrimp Branchinttla lynchi thn:atcncd llell
Munz' s ooion Alli""' munzii endangered
Sm Diego arnbmst• Ambro, la P""' i/a erulangucd
111Rad- lcav« I brodiaca Brod• a,afi/ifolia threatened
lender- homed 11P1.11Ctlower Dod« a/,e,,, a lepr« uas ondmgffal Sanla An River woolly- SW
Eria, Jn,m doulfi,/ 1,,,,, ssp.
endangered
IOlfCtorw, c
Slender- homed 5J>inetlowcr Doduolumw ltpto« nu endangered Sprading navanctia NaWJrntiafossaJU threatened
Im
southwestern willow
Empidonax / roil/ ii ati,m, s cnd ngercd fly,:aichcr
1c .. 1Bell 's vireo Vir«D b,1/ii pusillUJ endangered
coastal Californ ia
Po/iopli/ a wlifomica threatened gnaltlt,; hcr
Stevens' kangaroo rat Dipodomy, st,pltensi erulangcml
Ampldbwu
arroyo toad Bufo ca/lfornicus cndmgc:= 1
mountain y,:llow-legaed frog Rana MIUCO. SQ endangered
lllma
Quino theckerspot butterfly Eupl,ydryas editlia quino endangered 1195

APPENDIX E
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM :

CITY OF BANNING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION AND

PHASE I RECYCLED WATER SYSTEM
Sectio n 2108 1 6 of the Pu blic Resources Code. enacted by passage of AB 3180 { Conese 8111 ). requores publte agencies approving projec ts with s1gnrficant env ironme ntal nnpacts to adopt a Mitigatio n Mornlonng and Reporting Program This objective of the program is to ensure that mIt1gatIon measures adopted ro avoid or mit igate potenl@lly sig nificant envsronrnenta l impacts arc implemented . Section 21081 6 of the Pubhc Resources Code req uires all stale and local agencies to es lablish monitoring and reporting programs whenever approval of a proJect rel•cs upon a mitigated negative declaration or an env,rnnmenlal impact repon ( EIR). In accordance with these requirements lhis m111gat10n monitoring and repo, ting program has been prepared lo ensure tha t mitiga tion measures 1dentriied In the Initial S1udy/ Millga1ed Negahve Decla ration for the Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion and Phase I Recycied Waler Sys tem or subseque nt revisions thereto). are impleme nted in an effective and timely manner . and lhat identified impacts are avoid ed or mitigated lo a level of 1ns19mficance. This program provides a d1scuss10 11 ol parties respo nsible for the mitigahon program , and a detailed discussion of mornl[)( lng and reponing procedu res for the m,t ,gahon .

I. RESPONSIBLE PARTY
The City of Banning Waler/ Wastewater Uhhhes Oe partmenl ( City) will be responsible for impl ementing and reporhng of the m1hga1ton measures 1n this m1l1gatKm program This agency will be respo nsible for construclion management and overs ight, and will ensure that mitigat. on meas ures are properly carried out by desig nated and quatdied personnel , which may include spec ialty contraciors II . MITIGATION REQU IREMEN TS
The Proposed Project includes construction lo expand lhe cx1shng was tewate r lrealmen l plant ( WW TP) by 3 .6 million gallons per day install new p1pehne to lmnspor1 recycled waler, construct a pump station and a storage rcservo or for recycled waler . Based on the rlfld Ings of lhe Initial Study, a total of ten ( 10) m 1tiga1ton measures are requ ired for biological and cultu ral resou rces , while four { 4) construction best management practices are recommended for aor quahty and hydrology/ waler qua lity. Po lentially significant impacts and specif, c mihgalion meas ures are described on Table 1.

Ill . SCHEDU LE AND REPORTING FREQUENCY
Mornlonng of m11\gatio n achvIt1es WIii be docume nted on a Mitigatio n Morntonng Report form ( see Exhibit A) This form w,11 be f!Hed out by the appropriate individual in lhe event an inadvertent c!1scovery of archaeolOQiCal materials paleo ntological materi als , Of human rern 611ns ; m0 found Mo nitoring reports will be submitted to the City, reta ined m tho C,ty s prOjCct Ides , and be available for 1nspec1ion upon requ est.

Complellon of these forms wi ll demonstrate and docume nt compliance wilh Public Resou rces Code 21081 6.

E-1
1196
Jt.;tcull~.3._e~-,:. q
MOual-t)'
Rt!& OUrrAII
l' oleflliatly ·-.._ -""· -· :
io~ en. 111 le
lf"" etfere nlh
T(,hUff' lelf' lfol'
wia : arwr.as
Ta bl e 1. Summary of Envir onm• nt al Impacts and M.ltlgaOon Mu9ures d Wlt: lgMton Me...,•
None ~ eq..ree
NcW\e'•eQ..re<:
ne t•.t ~"" c: wac: Lce c. t~ tor dust = ontr011SrwcD1T""' 811ded F.-. qua11( yal ........

Tho k.,,~~ ,...._.Jfr'9"' ,io,; i'°'"'"' - be -"" OJrpor.tte-o INC Pf'O:«l de.sign and IL:-n- lQC"ii d~9" prn·-i;ba'Jllld«l"Yl'll"Tllte~btlltost .. •c.-ncc, COMo-i!:JOn.-w:I dllflrl9CO" WU:::. ot1
P•~!, r.e Cf!."'9" lhil be "~• ted tr:, tna t/ls1.Pbet1 & l,w.'CH/ls of ' he aLS1t19 ,~·•' WJ . 110tlg rV..stP:. Jfd A...enue Ptiieerrotir. t d req-oed it.Jrr- l)IPel-w n li"I "'as/ lfls CY creeili:.~ l! f• b9 avo«:Jad I ...... fk: aw.•
MMM,t~
lei1$ 1"!. an
l•gnif31'" 11
q,,..1R',f"..ci O>:JC:19,S! """' be ara.sent d'.lrlltri,· -.---.-.," 9--,,-""""--,.,- 11-0..-.. n-.----- L-•• -.- l"-..., r,d .-,.:s1u1t. ltu t:J etisw• tttar cons. truci' on ... en.: IH do not srrar i,.,; rr .:·.: tn• i1GW' fn o.' Wes~ ro' A~ e ,ito grssSJa! 1ds of rr.arg,naJ qu8' Jy bur wherw lf3ngarco r• t btxrOWJ rrwgh! occur not! r :,: me Df0/6C1 s.:e P,p./,oe "1S: a/ li1! 0' I .,, o,,g Wes.~ Md A'o'e/1lle' from SJr; set A•.- efkl• :::
lne Sun LB1ies IY)l.l.5,"'!1 erea would ee conducted bf fT>t(t1rJ1JZl/1fl ti.., WIIJJ/ J ~ ,,..,. trenc.Ji ccrr, oor ta len U.an 5 '" t wl,e;r<,ver l)OSSJl14, Co,itC,!K"r..on iay,1own af'd . s~ .,-.as . t~ be st.od ~ nsarb/ Pih-SO read s.xtacu M)L.I wouJd not M IOcltte- d IJf.YX', any 11HJ0S: ur~ n.Hur.tlor-e.ts
To ~ ll'Jld pater. Lr .mpacis. Cl) f'l,$. ... UCf. t()n lt"()j''II' h, nfS ; vo.;J<J be dHrly Oet' J(:. 3~ on O'.) r-.' ftmct, o,, pl.( J(' IS stt(/ .-; p& CJl, cat. c, ru To .. tai"' r.alM platlf • na~,~. lint ropaoJ f9JTtC.. ed . 6-om lhe s>re vo.A:J 00 . stoc~ COtle~ and replac« J on-s.."9, as mur..11 os r,cu;IJle Dw- no pioelina COI\ Slru~ t'°' 1. any : IOt'l•i>ail9d .: vea. 1 tf)flr ill'fl rr.nched t.' 00' 1 b# r~(tAl'ntO ( O ( her origm, 81 cond, r,on fofo, nt, p, oe4no "' 1$ 1..,/ fafiofl
E-2
l.:>Of'll~des9"
oonorr. llOf' lani,
dunng txrltn. c". o,
l,;,o,'10""'- du"9'1
ionand
duf'ln!iCD"WU:::!IDn
L:,or 1CIC't de5,gn
COM~•\ 1() 11~
dunng « • fl1'1.C.ion
u: xr 10C~ dH", on
on and
durngcc.-:st.r.ic;:::q,
eu: han
19". ICa"" I
f! n :nan
s. qn'\ t¥' til
ns:han
lfQl'l-"ica--1
us: han
Mgni" K. rt
Re-. ou,' 4 . t.ru
Cub~ RUOU"t41
I
Tabl e 1 Summnry of Environmen tal lmpJict, t111cl r.th~ tlon Meat urat: ( Conl' d} Pot• nt•'°)'~ WII ____...,,..,_
Cc-, 1·.. ct· M"
ac: i, :ie• mar
f! nCL_ i"terDfhfOl.. lsty
unc: b.; t;loT" ec!
a,c--
18' 0,..•: e-;
Cona:rudQn
IICLit'lbe-lV-0
un., t', l'l "IC. M't..."oe
co11«; 11ono1ro. 111
re.nain•b)
O:lftti,lJI.K..!lun
Mil
ho
0 Frequ. n, eyof .._ ..

P,e atpe 11() t! J ,' rum Well Rt :a I~~ vr.- vrp wooid bo ,311tf/ 11fi-:1 U:,o,- 1()(YI· • t.:> a-.od S.:-, JJ- tB2' Je TNI C.Jy ~-• rJ e-r~e- ttat a Qt,ai,'".(Y./ des,;n a,,- ct, aeolof}- Cal mo,..- o,- flaps f'1e 00<.Jf"d(J(-e,; cl rhe s..-re p1, or ' C' any =: iut, grourdHQTJ.. and ~ ha! ffie l'TIO'l,:O, •. s peur. t d:.nnt_; pP'< ne con.:,~ r~nctt," 9 a! tti.s bcs: ion l/1 Jieu ": JI a.. 00~ ! h6 S'lo, ! t'oe C,ty may a!.::.o COf'l!J..x:t ar1 3':: fl~C8' re.s:ll'!g and evttiuaroi TY'JV"lm tor S;te 22-, e~ 11.s ae. sct'Oea ~ rrie C.!Jttura,' Re so.Jn::es Sun.· ey Rppon fJUi/ 2'! J, 2QC; 7j farthlSpn:: 1f9CL
e evef' lf .,,,, arc~.. aJ rr.aiet:3/5 or sub.J'1lfsc.• oepos• rs are :,;,_., u. Q dur,n,g • arlnmo". l"ng aclr~.ltes, l'lft co.• 1slfucflQ() crJnlr-= tor NOU! d =-,,. so ot:.mory "" t ,w; <> ffectt: d .,,- u (e g rer1"" 1Ct IJCl,.-.:.es 1f1t.'.'l eno:hf,, MYt•J unt~ the o., co~ clin !> fl e,1;,,uat&d by a o.1a~ f" archa&~• st or 11,s!anc: , esou, c.,. s . soec,-, J,s!, as eqt,n-:,, Qf" O apprc; o,i.1:e ~• a:n"le() t rTllH. S..res nv:,>-mer.•e:J To lN' OIO :, o~en:.ui. - pac1s to oa.eo,;, t~ r&Saurcftl!> UT• J 1L-1ct wOrtJld a!'IMlre lhat the rNO ""': iga:t00 me35Jfes de~ n:>e<I ab(r,e are 1'\COl'pore1ed ~ Ho prqect °' 8'11"' ng lthese measures lt\U.Jk:i relt.rJC! gCIU'CI Cl!.(ur:>.ince lO spec/lCd wor·, are.JS) IJ"lfi tl-ie foUowv-,g ma. gator ' Mltid be m:>le-ner1ed d. rngcor,. str. x::'°" In ttM •"" nl oa:. orttalu{;- cJI rosOIJf::: r.s we encour. 1ereo d..,,.,r,g eltfthW't',t'lt ~ CondnJCIIOn COl"l!rBG1ar A' O< i!d CHY llc/Jvtty , n rho affeded ..,.. (• 9 n1dwwd Kt.nhas , r,ro ~ ~ e;i) u, l( C ti wa1tlied , o.eon1o,,oga.,r ~ 6\f&'u.tre ff¥ O<SOOVe!ty lH1t1 tmn'e."!'8nt l!lflPIT) prlJJ /e treatmam 1'" 1' 8.SurH The DGlcontolog;$! VIIO',JIJ detarm, ne ii the ~ talo( J,, cet " 1; 3!..-, 41 snot.,;d be . sa'vitgeC. oen,_,fie<J ~ pemwierr: y l)(~ser,' 6d C,1rat.on ol q,ec,mer. s 11120 an accntOltttd mu.sa....m ,. oo, silorf l/ltOIJkJ ~ ~ oy a ouaJ•'> so pa, teo, 1tciogtS: r. wno WOI. Jc B!so o,~,:x,r-e a ~ f:011 of find1r1gs for the Dry of B•"""'! I I
E3
JPOO ..... "'-i.

C-·$ io. Jfl
om:>•tiorl
Clunn9
h1fT' eC. al. 81;·
upon -
S'9ffllcanc•Att.,-
ess~
Slgtllv.a-'1
Leulh. ln
nl
Lent!°; an
atgr111can1
1197
f
C1,, lt., r• RtiSOUl' O" S
Coote
G•Qlq.'Y ~ Sol!s
az~ 1Uon( I
zaroous ~ ton. ti•
CrOIOgyand- lw...-
O.uar,~,,
hbl a 1. Summary ol ! nviro' lmtfll;) I lmp. 1ct1 ; md Mlttga11on Mt. a, ure, ( Cont ' d } Pot, nti., ly S ~ I • L
eel No. J M11pionllN~
Cons•""""'
t:.-lc. o:

I ...-,
ene;our,>,&-r_.,, 1 hurrr
ll! m. lll" l
l
11 To a''°4d oo: c nbal , mpaci5 to h\ Jff' a'l ren1~ f"$ l~ -.3,- be b< mrd benea: r the su. f.,ce "' th e- work arN : he C·ty \ YOU-d enwre it-.at the folo-Mr,g m tga bon measul" 1! s .,. prem8f' le<J
trr ~ ' Jl'el"i/ il11man rema. ns are encourler&': i durr, g prqecf oof"ltti..d!iott. the Rilfllf3109 Cou! Jiy C: won. shaJ be cont. Jctea ra oe."OmW•C M- hfll' lt:I ()( f10I inve5llQriltlOt' 1 of the '- IIUSB of dea! h 1s rltCX, l,1'9d In : he e.renf th6 111,,,ams .- a Na!Nft .A.me:1ca11 .- 1 c;ng"l'I. th6 Nsbv9 Amefc~ u Her, fagfl Co1nmi: s.$, IOl1 smJH be C-OmM; fed ro ue~ nece" 8t)' ~ e. s for pro: scrx, n artd preservatJOfl 0, lndJO. np re~. a..s ~ If' Dia CEOA G~ deoino. s
SecJ, oo 15064 5( t}
r-.o-,11 r&Qt#ltd
Three CO"l51Mf, l')f"I b@st mar. age.,, ent p--cK:Xes fO' wrOli1011 CO' lllo wou, d be rnplttment& d du< lf~ constrvct' O' l d :> ro,ect facil I.es to If" l"f'•Ze ne oo:ent1a. for sed f""'@nt lo be pcked uo ane tr.t,.,.soorted olf. ikl !:Jyru" IO'f
12 Sror, card IN' G. S.('] I) cor..>ro/ mea~ s NOuki tneude stoc~ ptii.,, g and I
covenn; topMJII, as """" . 1.:. t»~t miJtltlgtl!!' tlltl :, rxr- cu , o ,:,rtJvenr w. le1 qu,1!1')' lf'- p« IS
Conr..- r-i.JCt1'Y equ pmem KOLJld not be nnsec off on- site 0t rn soe/1 a ma. l"IMr aJ : o iKl'.- e, soty moact Sm, th ~ I{ Blong rile SOtXf--, em bot; f"'. 1¥ f of tntJ IJt"C>,eCI .$1.'e
Cons.' 11:r..;tcr. niat~ ls llll'()t.JlcJ be COtl9red and StOt' ed , i con!~ KHld iJl~~ s .,..,,.,. tram an1 cfrsm,age srBas Cor. struct. or. tr1J'l8r.-.;)(s 'f'f'OU'd t. oo·. wed 11nd sforeo , n conta, noa ar•;, s . Jw3y from / Jf'II ora1ni1Qft a.'e.3'!
E- 4
Fr,~of ........
t•,-
upon
c> sc.....,
Upol'- 100, _.,,
iew,
tndo...- r1.
con sl:'VCl. on
I Upon 100"<,
d:. n"' 5j
on•tn..clG'"
Upon 1~'-;. ,....,, --
oli") C- dU~
consln. ct.or
lignlncMlce NIM .. ._ ...
lti.< i.: f\ ftn
5J'lltk;.'l,1
l
s,gn,fw:.ant
lflSt,._..,
sgn. fc.anc
Leul". a.,
s,gn.fcant
u ....

LandlJM. Jf' ldP~
1-i~ Resouus
PoWJl:.>"', tnl'! , tou-.. .ny
Public Sttr•-:. H
rl!, 8tY
T•..-~ 1.. 11, on.•,, 1'!ii
tilitoes and Scr,., re
s,.....,.

MJ ..... ~:Of) f ~ 5 ol
Slgni~
Table 1. Summary of Env lronmontal Impacts and Mitigation Moasuru ( Cont' d) Potent~ .,,
S~bntlmfNC- 1 ...

Nono ~-""'
I ,._..~, Is;,-.""' I .. ...,
9NflUIRI lfflfNC-1 NO. . M..Ug.ltlOn .. .....,. R•~ llftlgadon ----i None ,._,.,....,.....

None I ,... orie,aqo,reu
N,-. I ~ rr.qu• n~ J -
Nono I ...............

I "°"" --
I Nooe ~ , .......... !
Nono l'li:,ne l'90uor9d
1--------------------+-------
None ~ req:.. Je( l
E5
1198

MITIGATION MONITORING REPORT
SECTION 21081 6 PUBLIC RE SOURCES COOc .
t?;
1 nu:ii,~~.:: vu i
City of B anning
W ater/ Wa stewater Utilities Dep artment
176 E . Lincoln Struot
Page __ of
B anning, Ca lifornia 92220 --

EXHIBIT A
ract1i1y Protecl

MITIGATION MONITORING REPORT FORM WWTP E XPANSION AND PHAS E I

REC YCLE D WATE R SY STE M
Locabon File No
M1bgc1bon Measure No ___
M1ltgat1on Descn pt,on·
Monitonng Frcqucncy Report>ng Requirement
Remarks
The llllarnabon r.CNdam. d 111 ll..s ffiport , s atl 11tdependttnt evalua1. o, ba! ifld on my personal observallons and , nformaf, on p, ovrd9d to me In acmrdance -. ilh Sect, on ' 1081 6 DI lhe CaJ, tom. a Public. Resources COOP. I lvNeby CErt, fy under penifhy ol perjury Iha/ the mformat, on conlatned here111 , s truR ; ff) CJ carec. l ro the oe."i.t of my kncrNledge rne o f Pel' son Co, rpletiog Form Ttl! e
S,goarur~ Da 1cs, g=
Form R~ e1ved by Signature
T1 lic Depa1tmet1li' O.vtSIOO Dale Rec' d
Compliance Acceptance: Yes D No Date Rec'd by Report Rec1p1ent Mil1Aatton Complo1od. Yes O No Date Complctod
Monitorion Comolcted· Vos D No Date Completed
Attach add1hom1I sheets rf necessary.
1199
City of Banning
Wastewater Treatment Plant
and Recycled Water Upgrades
Feasibility Study ( Revision 1)
Ja nu ary 5, 2024
N2W Engineering, Inc . T 714. 716. 1711
3240 El Camino Real, Suite 150, Irvine, CA 92602 info@n2weng. com Page Ii
Prepa red by : Iris Ji mene z and Jam al Aw ad
Revi ewe d by: James Wang
Page I ii
1200
Table of Contents

1. Introduction 1

1.1 1
1 .2

1.3 Non- Federal Project Spo nso r .......................................................................................... 1 Study Area and Project

1.3 .1 Land

1.3.2 1.3.3

1.4 Reclaimed Water Area
1 4
6 6

2. Statement of Problem and Needs
7 8
8 3.

2.1 2.2

2.3 Introduction
Need for Water Reclamation ...

Current Water Supplies .......

Water Sources and Supp lies
Wast ewater Treatment Plant Flows
8 g
g
12 2 .3.1

2.3.2 2.3.3 Non- Potable Groundwater We ll Capacities .............................................................. 15

2.3.4 Recycled Water Production 16

2.4 Current and Projected Water Demands 16

2.4.1 2.4.2

2.4.3 Current Wa ter Demands. ............................................................. 16 Projected Water
Projected Recycled Water Demands

2.4.4 Projected Water Supp ly and Demand Imbalances... .. ....... .

2.5 Future Recycled Water Supplies ......... ..
17 18
19 20

2.6 Water Qua lity Concerns ................................................................................................ 20

2.6.1 Regional Water Qua lit y Contro l Board Order ............... .. .. 20

2.6.2 Title 22 Requirement s ............................................................................................... 22

2.6.3 Beaumont Bas in Plan Requi re ments
Water Rec lamation, Recyc li ng Opportunities

3.1 3.2

3.3 Introdu cti on
Uses for Reclaimed Water
Water Market Ava ilab le to Utilize Reclaimed Water
22 23
23 23
23 Page I iii

3. 3.1

3.3.2 3.4

3.5 3.6

3.7 3.8

3.9 3.10
Methodology
Potent ial Cust omers
Cons iderations Th at Wi ll Pre vent Im pleme nting W ater Reclamati on Agencies with Jurisdiction Ove r Sources of Rec lai med Water Potential Sources to be Reclaimed
23 24
24 24
24 Description and Location of Source Water Faci liti es .................................................... 24 Curre nt Water Re clamati on Taking Place in St udy Area Other Current and Project ed Wastewaters and Di spo sa l Options ......... ..

Water Reclama ti on Te chnology Use in Study Area
24 25
25 4. Descr ipti on of Alternat ives ................................................................................................... 26

4.1 Non- Fe de ra l Funding Condition .................................................................................. 26 4 .2 Specifi c Object ives Alternatives Are Des igned to Address ......................................... 26

4. 2.1 Alternative 1 - Do 26

4. 2.2 27

4. 2. 3

4.3 4.4
4 .5
Alt erna ti ve 2 - Non- Potable Reuse
Alternative 3 - Hybrid Non- Potable Reuse and Indi rect Potable Reuse ............ 28 Description of th e Proposed Water Recl amation Proj ect .......................................... 30 Estimated Costs of Alternatives .................................................................................... 32 Waste- Stream Discharge Treatment

4.6 Alte rnat ive Technologies
32 33
34 34
34 5. Economic

5. 1 Introduct io n ................................................................................................. .

5.2 5.3

5.4 5.5
Economic
Cost Comparison of Alternatives that Would Satisfy Demand of Proposed Project.. .. 34 Description and Benefits of Water Supp ly Alternatives ................................... .

A ltern at ive Most Likely to be Implemented in Ab sence of Project ...... . 35 35
5 .6 Qualitative Benefits and Justifi cation of Water Reclamation ....................................... 35

6. Selection of the p roposed Water Reclamat ion Project.. ...................................................... 37

6.1 Int ro du ction 37

6.2 Justification of Wat er Reclamation as Selected Alternative ......................................... 37

6.3 A na lysis of Water Reclamation ..................................................................................... 37 Page I iv
1201

6.3.1 Reduction , Postponement, or Elimination of Development of New or Expanded Water Supplies and Reduction of Diversions of Natural Water Courses ........................... 37

6.3.2 Reduction of Demand on Existing Federal Water Supply Facilities .. 37

6.3.3 Reduction , Postponement, or Elimination of new or Expanded Wastewater Facilities 38 7. Environmental Considerations and Potential 39
39 39
41 8.
7 .1
7 .2

7.3 7 .4
Introduction
Potential Environmental Impacts and Effects
Public
Effect of Historic Properties .......................................................................................... 41

7.5 Avoiding Public Health and Environmental Quality Issues Associated with Use of Reclaimed Water .................................................................................................................... 41 Legal and Institutional Requirements. ......................................................... 43

8.1 8.2
Introduction
Analysis of Water Rights Issues
43 43

8.3 Discussion of Lega l and Institutional Requirements with Potential to Affect Implementation of Project... ................... .............. .... ..................... . ................................. 43

8.3.1 Department of Water Resources - Sustainable Groundwater Management Act.. .. 43

8.3.2 8.3.3

8.3.4 Groundwater Susta inability Agencies ... ........ ........ ................ .................... . .. 43 Groundwater Sustainability Plans.. ....... ..... ........ ...................... . 44 San Gorgonio Pass Subbasin ........................... ................... . ................................. 44

8.3.5 Santa Ana River Basin Plan 45

8.4 8.5

8.6 8.7

8.8 Discussion of Need for Multi-Jurisdictional or lnteragency Agreements.. . ............ 45 Discussion of Permitting Procedures Required................................................ . ....... 45 Discussion of Unresolved Issues Associated with Implementing Proposed Project .... 46 Identification of Current and Proposed Discharge Requirements .............................. 46 Rights to Wastewater Discharges .. .................. . .. 46

9. Financial Capability of 47

9.1 47

9.2 9.3

9.4 Introduction
47 Willingness and Capability of the City of Banning to Fund the Project ....................... 49 Project Funding Plan 49
Page Iv

9.4.1 Operating Budgets

9.4.2 Development Impact Fees

9.5 Other Funding Sources

10. Research

11. References
List of Figures
49 so
51 52
53 Figure l. City of Banning Project Map (courtesy of 2018 Integrated Master Plan (2018 IMP)) ... 3 Figure 2. City of Banning- Known Developments (courtesy of 2018 IMP ) .................................... 5 Figure 3. City of Banning Reclaimed Water Area (courtesy of 2018 IMP) ...................................... 7 Figure 4. City of Banning Reclaimed Wastewater Treatment Plant Location (courtesy of 2018 IMP ) 14 Figure 5. Process Schematic for Existing WWTP ........................................................................... 15 Figure 6. City of Banning Potential Recycled Water Customers (courtesy of 2018 IMP) ............. 19 Figure 7. Preliminary Site Layout for Alternative 3 (courtesy of 2018 IMP) ................................ 29 List of Tables
Table 1. Current Land Use & Economic Statistics for Riverside County and City of Banning Land 4 Table 2. Recent Climate Characteristics (2022 - 2023) ................................................... . ... 6 Table 3. Imported Water Purchases, courtesy of the 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (2020 Table 4. Imported Water Purchases, courtesy of the 2020 UWMP Table 5. Projected Water Supply Availability in AFY, courtesy of the 2020 UWMP ....

Table 6. Wastewater Flows Collected in
Table 8. Existing City Non-Potable Groundwater Well Capacities Table 9. Recycled Water Produced and/or Used in
Table 10. City Recent Water Use
Table 11. Projected Water Demand by Sector in AFY , courtesy of the 2020 UWMP Table 12. Potential Recycled Water
Table 13. Projected Water Supply and Demand Imbalances
Table 14. Projected Recycled Water Production and /or
Table 15. Banning WWTP Effluent Concentrations and Limitations 9 10
13 15-
16 17
17 18
19 20
21 Table 16. Preliminary Cost Estimate ............................................................................................. 30 Table 17. Cost Summary of Phase I of the Proposed Project, in 2023 dollars ............................. 31 Table 18. Replacement Costs, in 2023
Table 19. Monetary
Table 20. Non-Monetary
32 32
35 Page I vi
1202
Table 21. Potential Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Mea sure s ........ .

Table 22. Project Schedule - Pha se 1
Table 23. Rate Increases
List of Appendices
Appendix A- RO Analysis Tech nical Memo
Append ix B - Ran cho San Gorgonio Water Supply Ass essment Append ix C - SO- Year Life cycle Cost
Append ix D - Preliminary Detailed Sit e Plan and Process Flow Diagram Appendix E - Prel im inary Capital Cost Estimate
App en dix F - Nitrogen Removal and Pl ant Re liability Techn ica l Memo Append ix G -WDR Board Order R7 - 2016- 001S
39 48
so
Page I vii
List of Abbreviations
ADD - average day demand
AFY - acre- feet per year
BMP - bes t management practice
BMZ - Bea umont Management Zone
CEOA- Ca lifornia Environ mental Qua lity Act
CIP - capital improvement plan
CWSRF - Cl ean Water State Revo lving Fund
DOW - Sta t e Water Resource s Control Board , Di v isi on of Drinking Wate r DWR - Ca liforn ia Department of Water Resources
ETo - evapotranspiration
FONS! - Find in g of No Significant Impacts
gpm - ga ll ons per day
GSAs - Gro undwater Su stainability Agenc ies
GSPs - Groundwater Sustai nab ility Plan s
IS- MND - Initial Study- M itiga ted Negative Declarat ion MBR - membrane bioreactor
MCL - maximum contami na nt level
MGD - million gallons per day
MWC- Banning Heights Mutual Water Comp an y
NEPA - Nationa l Environmental Po li cy Act
NTU - nephelometric turbidity un it
O& M - operation and main tenance
RO - reverse osmosis
RWQCB- Colorado River Ba sin Regional Water Quality Cont ro l Board SGMA- Sustainable Groundwater Management Act
SGPWA- San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency
STMZ - San Timoteo Management Zone
WP - Cali fo rnia State Water Project
SWRCB - St ate Water Resources Control Board
TDS - total dissol ved solids
TN - total Nitrogen
US EPA- United States Enviro nm enta l Protection Agency UVAOP - ultraviolet adva nced oxidation
WDRs - was te discharge requir eme nts
WI FIA- Water Infrastru cture Finance Innovation Act
WWTP - City of Banning Wastewater Tre atment Plant
Page I viii
1203

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Banning ( City) has prepared this feasibility study to support a grant application for Wat erSMA RT: Title XVI WllN Act Water Reclamation and Reuse Projects for Fiscal Years 2023 and 2024 per Funding Opportunity Announcement No. R23AS00464 . This study evaluates the feasibility of upg rading the City' s Wastewater Treatment Plant ( WWTP) to tert ia ry disinfected recycled water sta ndards for non- potable reuse under the terms of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation ( USBR) Water Reclamation and Reuse ( Title XVI ) program. This study is structured to follow the Bureau of Reclamation Manual, Di rectives and Standards, " WTR 11- 0 1." The existing WWTP consis t s of preliminary treatment, primary treatment, secondary treatment, so lid s handling, disinfection ( currently not in use ), and evaporation/ percolation po nds . The WWTP effluent is currently in compliance with d ischa rge requ irements, but it requires significant upgrades to comply with impen di ng water qual ity discharge limits by the Regional Water Quality Control Board ( RWQCB). In add ition, the Tric kling Filters, wh ich perform secondary treatment, have reached their end of life. WWTP effluent discharges to percolation ponds that rech arge into the Cabazon Groundwater Basin but is not entirely extracted by Banning - the percolated water flows to other water agencies located downgradient.

The proposed Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades Proje ct ( Project) evaluated by this study consists of three phases : I) upgrading the existing WWTP to recyc led water standards and building pipelines to connect the WWTP to customers currently using ground water from non- potable wells, II) building pipelines to connect the WWTP to the future recycled water customers, and 111) building pipelines to connect the WWTP to a groundwater recha rge basin upgradient of the Cabazon storage unit. Phase I will be implemented in the near term, and Phases II and 111 will be implemented in the long- term. Phase s II and Ill are not included in this Feas ibi lity Study for clarity. The City ha s only requested funding for Phase I in the WaterSMART fund ing application but will seek additional funding for Phases II and 111 in the future and will provide an updated Fea sib ility Study at that time.

Currently, the re are no non- potable recycled water uses that have been implemented in the City.

By implementi ng both project components, non- potab le reu se and indirect potable reuse, the supply and usage of locally sourced non- potab le water supply will increase by an estimated 4,035 AFY ( 3 .6 MGD) of recycled water.

The City relies upon purchasing water from the San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency ( SGPWA) for groundwater recharge. The increased supply of local non- potab le water supplies produced from th is Project would decrease demands on the SGPWA, and on its su pplier, the California State Water Project, thereby reducing diversions from natural watercourses in the Sacramento- San Joa qu in Delta. The Project also provides non- quantifiable be nefits includ ing imp rov ing nonpotable water supply reliab ility and drought resiliency.

Page I ix

1. INTRODUCTION
Prelude
The proposed Wastewater Treatment Plant and Recycled Water Upgrades Project ( Project) is the subject of this feasibility study, which supports a grant application for WaterSMART: Title XVI WIIN Act Water Reclamation and Reuse Projects for Fiscal Years 2023 and 2024 per Funding Opportunity Announcement No . R23AS00464 . This study is structured to follow the Bureau of Reclamat io n Manual, Directives and Standards, " WTRll- 01 ," which was intended for reclamation projects. The purpose is to evaluate Project feasibility under the terms of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation ( USBR) Water Reclamation and Reuse ( Title XVI) program .

The Project evaluated by this study involves upgrading the existing Wastewater Treatment Plant WWTP) at the City of Banning ( City) to Title 22 standards for recycled water use.

At this time, effluent from the WWTP meets the effluent water quality discharge requirements.

However, the WWTP will not be able to meet the impend ing discharge limits proposed by the Colorado River Basin Regional Water Qua lity Contro l Boad { RWQCB). In addition, many treatment facilities at the plant have reached the end of their useful life. WWTP effluent is currently discharged to percolation ponds that recharge into the Cabazon Groundwater Basin but is not entirely extracted by Banning - the percolated water flow s to other water agencies located downgradient .

By replacing existing equipment with new facilities that can treat the water to tertiary disinfected recycled water standards, the WWTP effluent can be used to meet current and future nonpotable water demands in the City. This allows the City to both meet the impending RWQCB requirements as well as benefit from their WWTP effluent. These benefits include reducing the City' s relia nce on imported water and improving the reliability of groundwater for drinking wate r purposes. Since the City is considered a Disadvantaged Community, a reliable local supply of water will also support City growth and economic development, which are dependent on the availability of water supplies.
l } Non- Federal Project Sponsor
The City of Banning is serving as the non- federal project sponsor . The City was incorporated as a Charter City in 1913, pursuant to the California Constitution Article XI and the California Government Code and is governed by an elected five- member council. It is a fu ll -service city, providing water and wastewater services through its Water and Wastewater Utilities Department, under the purview of the City Council.

I 1 Study Area and Project Map
The City of Banning is in the northwestern portion of Rivers id e County, approximate ly 25 mi les east of downtown Riverside and approximately 30 miles west of the City of Palm Springs. The City