October 14, 2025
4:00 p.m.
In Chambers
Council Chambers
99 E. Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. WORKSHOP
2.1 Review of the Updated City of Banning User Fee Handbook
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS - Agenda Items Only
4. ADJOURNMENT
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL - SPECIAL MEETING (WORKSHOP)
CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA
The following information comprises the agenda for the special meeting of the Banning City Council, a joint meeting of the City Council and Banning Utility Authority, and the Banning City Council sitting in its capacity as the Banning Successor Agency Board.
This meeting is being held via Zoom so that members of the public may observe and participate in this meeting electronically. If you participate in this meeting via Zoom, you are agreeing to abide by the City's Zoom Community Standards for Public Meetings (provided in full on the last page of the agenda). Esta reunión se lleva a cabo en la Cámara y a través de Video/Teleconferencia en Zoom para que los miembros del público puedan observar y participar en esta reunión de manera electrónica. Si elige participar en esta reunión a través de Zoom, acepta cumplir con los Estándares comunitarios de Zoom para reuniones públicas de la ciudad (que se proporcionan en su totalidad en la última página de la agenda).
To observe and participate in the online video portion of the meeting through your personal computer or device, follow this link:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82012644588?pwd=RwqtJC8xehLDKZvr3LEKOf9u8uP2pt.1 Dial in: +1 669 900 9128
Meeting ID: 820 1264 4588
Password: 92220
Per the City of Banning Manual of Procedural Guidelines, matters taken up by the Council before 10 p.m. may be concluded, but no new matters shall be taken up except upon a majority vote of the council members present and voting. Such an extension shall only be valid for one hour and each hour thereafter shall require a renewed action for the meeting to continue.
Recommendation: Provide direction to staff and the City's consultant Zoom Community Standards for Public Meetings
City Council - Special Meeting (Workshop) Agenda
October 14, 2025
1 By participating in this meeting on Zoom, you are agreeing to abide by the City of Banning’s Community Standards for Public Meetings. Zoom attendees that fail to adhere to these standards may be removed from the meeting room.
Your microphone must remain on mute, and you may only unmute your microphone when/if you are recognized by the Mayor.
Your camera must be turned off unless/until you are recognized by the Mayor.
To indicate a desire to make Public Comment, you must use the Raise Hand function. The Mayor will not recognize those who have not used the Raise Hand function.
Public Comment from Zoom attendees will immediately follow in-person comment from members of the public in Council Chambers.
If you fail to adhere to these community guidelines, you may be removed for disrupting the meeting occurring in Council Chambers. You may rejoin the meeting but may be removed for each violation of these community standards.
The chat function will be disabled for all City Council meetings on Zoom.
Estándares comunitarios de Zoom para Reuniones Públicas Al participar en esta reunión en Zoom, usted acepta cumplir con los Estándares Comunitarios para Reuniones Públicas de la ciudad de Banning. Los que atienden por Zoom que no cumplan con estos estándares pueden ser retirados de la sala de reuniones.
Su micrófono debe permanecer en silencio, y solo puede reactivar su micrófono cuando / si es reconocido por el alcalde.
Su cámara debe estar apagada a menos que sea reconocido por el alcalde.
Para indicar el deseo de hacer un Comentario Público, debe utilizar la función Levantar la mano. El alcalde no reconocerá a quienes no hayan utilizado la función Levantar la mano.
Los comentarios públicos de lo que atienden por Zoom seguirán inmediatamente los comentarios en persona de los miembros del público en las Cámaras del Consejo.
Si no cumple con estas pautas de la comunidad, es posible que lo destituyan por interrumpir la reunión que tiene lugar en las Cámaras del Consejo. Puede volver a unirse a la reunión, pero es posible que lo eliminen por cada violación de estos estándares de la comunidad.
La función de chat estará deshabilitada para todas las Reuniones del Ayuntamiento en Zoom.
AFFIDAVIT • DECLARACIÓN JURADA
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED under the laws of the State of California that the above agenda was posted on the City's website (www.banningca.gov) as well as the Bulletin Board at Banning City Hall, located at 99 E Ramsey Street, Banning, CA 92220, at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting.
_________________________
Vickie Sellers, Elected City Clerk
Secretaria Municipal Electa
City Council - Special Meeting (Workshop) Agenda
October 14, 2025
2 PUBLIC NOTICE • NOTICIA PÚBLICA
Meeting Agendas and Notices
Interested in receiving email and/or text notifications of upcoming City Council meetings? Sign up for meeting notifications through the City's website. Pursuant to amended Government Code §54957.5(b), staff reports and other public records related to open session agenda items are available on the City's website (www.banningca.gov/).
Public Comment
Agenda Items
Any member of the public may address this meeting of the City Council on any item appearing on the agenda. A five-minute limitation shall apply to each member of the public and no member of the public shall be permitted to share their time with any other person.
Non-Agenda Items
Any member of the public may address this meeting of the City Council on any item which does not appear on the regular meeting agenda but is of interest to the general public and is an item upon which the City Council may act. A three-minute limitation shall apply to each member of the public and no member shall be permitted to share their time with any other person. No action shall be taken, nor discussion held by the City Council, on any item which does not appear on the agenda, unless the action is otherwise authorized in accordance with the provisions of subdivision (b) of §54954.2 of the Government Code.
Special Assistance/Accessibility Requests
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any member of the public may request that the agenda and agenda packet be mailed to them. If you need special assistance to participate in this meeting (such as translation services), please contact the City Clerk's Office. Advanced notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will allow the city to make arrangements to ensure your accessibility.
¿Necesita servicios de traducción para participar? Contacto Oficina del Secretario de la Ciudad.
CONTACT • CONTACTO
City Clerk's Office | 951-922-3102 | [email protected] 99 East Ramsey Street, Banning, California 92220
City Council - Special Meeting (Workshop) Agenda
October 14, 2025
3 CITY OF BANNING
STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Arturo Vela, Interim City Manager
PREPARED BY: Nate Smith, Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer MEETING DATE: October 14, 2025
SUBJECT: Review of the Updated City of Banning User Fee Handbook RECOMMENDATION:
Provide direction to staff and the City's consultant
BACKGROUND:
City Council approved Resolution 2024-92 on June 11th, 2024 that approved a professional services agreement with Matrix Consulting Group LTD for the Comprehensive User Fee and Impact Fee Study.
This study would provide an update to both the User Fees assessed by the City of Banning for services provided to the public, as well as updates to the Development Impact Fee program. The workshop today will focus on the update to the Comprehensive User Fees.
The previous Comprehensive User Fee study was completed and adopted by City Council with Resolution 2019-113 on December 10, 2019 and Ordinance 1553 adopted on January 14, 2020. Copies of these documents are attached as reference to this staff report. It is necessary to evaluate and complete a comprehensive update every 5-7 years to ensure that user fees are in line with the costs to provide services, as well as the policies of the City Council. A full background of the analysis in available in the DRAFT Comprehensive User Fee Study Report, attached to this staff report. Below are a sample of work that was completed and recommendations in the report for City Council's consideration.
To create the proposed user fees for services, the consultant performed the following tasks:
Department/Program Staff Interviews
Data Collection
Cost Analysis
Review and Approval of Results with City Staff
The report identified that there is a discrepancy between the cost of services provided and the user fees collected for those services. The establishment of policy related to cost recovery and level of assessment is at City Council's discretion with input from this report, City staff, and the general public.
Matrix Consulting has made the following recommendations, which are detailed in the report:
Review cost recovery policy (BMC 3.26.080)
Adoption of an annual fee update/increase mechanism
Matrix Consulting and City staff are looking for direction and/or concurrence on the draft findings presented in the report. Those comments will be incorporated in the final document. Staff anticipates bringing the Comprehensive User Fee Study to the October 28th Regular Meeting of the City Council, but that date is subject to change based on City Council's input and direction 4 JUSTIFICATION:
The current user fees were established in 2019 and have not been adjusted since that time. It is necessary from time to time to update the user fees to reflect current labor costs and time requirements for City staff to complete tasks and recover costs associated with performing these City functions.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None at this time. Fiscal impact will depend on direction received from City Council and more detail will be provided at the Public Hearing on October 28.
ALTERNATIVES:
n/a
BUDGETED?:
No
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT:
No
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 2024-092.pdf
2. Resolution No. 2019-113.pdf
3. Ordinance No. 1553.pdf
4. DRAFT Banning FY26 Fee Study Report.pdf
5. DRAFT Banning Master Fee Schedule.pdf
6. BMC 3.26 FEE AND SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE-COST COMPARISON.pdf 5 RESOLUTION 2024- 92
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP LTD (" MATRIX") FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY IN AN AMOUNT NOT- TO- EXCEED $ 96, 954. 00
WHEREAS, the City desires to undertake a comprehensive citywide review and evaluation of user fee and rate charges resulting in a cost- based user fee study. The Comprehensive User Fee Study will calculate the full 100% cost of providing certain City services and provide a recommended fee to be charged for each applicable service; and WHEREAS, the City will have to comply with Proposition 26, Proposition 218, and other applicable statutory requirements ( including the 2024 California Business Roundtable Ballot initiative (" 2024 CBRT Ballot Initiative")); and WHEREAS, on March 6, 2024, staff released a Request for Proposals for the Comprehensive User Fee and Impact Fee Study. In response, one proposal was received by Matrix. After evaluation of the proposal, staff recommends the award of a Professional Services Agreement to Matrix; and
WHEREAS, the total cost of the Professional Services Agreement ( PSA) with Kimley- Horn is for a "not- to-exceed" amount of $96,954. 00, which includes a 10% contingency NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council approves the Professional Services Agreement with Matrix for the Comprehensive User Fee and Impact Fee Study in an amount of $ 88,140. 00, attached as Exhibit A, and approves a ten percent contingency for a total not- to-exceed amount of $96,954. 00.
SECTION 2. The City Council authorizes the City Manager to make non- substantive changes to the Professional Services Agreement and to execute the Professional Services Agreement with Matrix on behalf of the City Council.
SECTION 3. The City Council authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to make necessary budget adjustments, appropriations, and transfers related to this resolution and to approve changes orders within the ten percent contingency.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of June 2021/ Resolution 2024- 92
Mayor
6 ATTEST:
Carol ine Patton , Admini
City of Banning
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Serita R. Young, City Attorney
Richards , Watson & Gershon
Resolution 2024- 92
7 CERTIFICATION:
I, Caroline Patton , Administrative City Clerk of the City of Banning , California , do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2024- 92 , was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California , at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11th day of June 2024 by the following vote , to wit:
AYES : Flynn , Happe , Minjares , Sanchez , and Wallace .
NOES :
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN :
Resolution 2024- 92
City of Bann ing , California
8 Resolution 2024- 92
EXHIBIT A
Agreement with Matrix Consulting
9 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ( C01032) FOR THE
COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE AND IMPACT FEE STUDY BY AND BETWEEN CITY
OF BANNING AND MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP, LTD
THIS AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ( herein " Agreement") is made and entered into this day: _________ , (" Effective Date") by and between the CITY OF BANNING, a California municipal corporation (" City") and Matrix Consulting Group, LTD, a California Corporation (" Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as " Party" and hereinafter collectively referred to as the " Parties."
RECITALS
A. City has sought by issuance of a Request for Proposals ( RFP # 23- 056) for the performance of the services for the Comprehensive User Fee and Impact Fee Study and as further defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement.
B. Consultant, following submission of a proposal for the perfonnance of the services defined and described paiiicularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, was selected by City to perform those services.
C. The Parties desire to formalize the selection ofConsultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 ofthis Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.
D. Pursuant to the City of Banning' s Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT
1.1 Scope of Services.
In compliance with all tenns and conditions of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide those services specified in the " Scope of Services" attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference, which services may be referred to herein as the " Services" hereunder. As a material inducement to City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the Services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the Services contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all Services described herein. Consultant covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in perfonning the Services required hereunder and that all materials will be of good quality, and fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase " highest professional 1-
10 standards" shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more first- class firms performing similar work under similar circumstances.
1.2 Contract Documents and Exhibits.
This Agreement includes the Request for Proposal and Consultant' s accepted proposal Contract Documents"), both of which are on file with the City and incorporated herein by this general reference as though fully set forth herein. Exhibit A ( Scope of Services), Exhibit B Special Requirements), Exhibit C ( Schedule of Compensation), and Exhibit D ( Schedule of Performance) also constitute a part of this Agreement and are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. Except as set forth in Section 1.10 regarding Exhibit B, this Agreement controls over the Contract Documents and the provisions in Exhibits A, Band C.
1.3 Compliance with Law.
Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of City and any Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered, and shall render all Services hereunder in accordance therewith.
1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments.
Consultant shall obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement, at its sole cost and expense, all necessary licenses, permits, certificates and approvals required by law for the performance of Services under this Agreement, including a City business license. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for all fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and which arise from or are necessary for Consultant' s performance of the Services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents, against all such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder.
1.5 Familiarity with Services.
By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant: ( i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the Scope of Services to be performed, ( ii) has carefully considered how the Services should be performed, and ( iii) fully understands the facilities and any difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the Services under this Agreement. If the Services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions existing therein, prior to commencement of Services hereunder. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the Services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant' s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer ( defined in Section 1.12. A).
1.6 Prevention of Loss and Damages.
Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the Tenn ( defined in Section 3.4) to furnish continuous protection to the work product, and the equipment, materials, papers, 2-
11 documents, plans, studies and/ or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the Services by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City' s own negligence.
1. 7 Further Responsibilities of Parties.
Both Parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both Parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonable necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither Party shall be responsible to perform the Services of the other.
1.8 Additional Services.
City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the Services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra services beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or to make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from the Services. No such extra services may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer to Consultant, which written order incorporates therein an adjustment in ( i) the Contract Sum ( as defined in Section
2.1 ), and/ or (ii) the Schedule of Performance, ( as defined in Section 3.2), and which written order is approved in writing by Consultant. Any increase in compensation ofup to ten percent ( 10%) of the Contract Sum, or $ 25, 000, whichever is less; or in the Schedule of Performance ofup to one hundred eighty ( 180) days maybe approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively, must be approved by City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to Services which are specifically set forth in the Scope of Services or which are reasonably contemplated therein. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the Services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor.
1.9 Facilities and Equipment.
Except as otherwise provided, Consultant shall, at its own cost and expense, provide all facilities and equipment necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement. City shall make available to Consultant only physical facilities such as desks, filing cabinets, and conference space (" City Facilities"), as City deems, in its sole discretion, to be reasonably necessary for Consultant' s use while consulting with City employees and reviewing records and the information in possession of City. The location, quality, and time of furnishing City Facilities shall be in the sole discretion of City. In no event shall City be required to furnish any facilities that may involve incurring any direct expense, including but not limited to a computer, long distance telephone, network data, internet or other communication charges, vehicles and reproduction facilities.
1.10 Special Requirements.
Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the " Special Requirements" attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit B and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit B shall govern. 3-
12 1.11 Corrections.
In addition to the indemnification obligations set forth in Article 4, and Sections 1.4, 1.13,
5.3, 5.4, and 6.3, Consultant shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the Services which may be disclosed during City' s review of Consultant' s report or plans. Should Consultant fail to make such correction( s) in a reasonably timely manner, such correction( s) may be made by City, and the cost thereof shall be charged to Consultant. In addition to all other available remedies, City may deduct the cost of such correction( s) from any retention amount held by City, or may withhold payment otherwise owed Consultant under this Agreement up to the amount of the cost of correction( s), as provided in Section 6.3.
1.12 Party Representatives.
A. Contract Officer: For the purposes of this Agreement, the Contract Officer shall be the City Manager, or such other person designated in writing by the City Manager Contract Officer"). Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager, to sign all documents on behalf of City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement.
B. Principals and Personnel of Consultant.
1) Consultant Representative: The following principal of Consultant is hereby designated as being the Consultant Representative authorized. to act on Consultant' s behalf regarding the Services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith:
Title
Khushboo Ingle Vice President
It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing Consultant Representative were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing Consultant Representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the Services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the Consultant Representative. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing Consultant Representative may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced or reassigned by Consultant without the express written approval of City. It shall be Consultant' s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the Services, and Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. 2) Consultant' s Personnel: Consultant has, or will secure at its own expense, all personnel required to perform the Services required under this Agreement. All of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision, and all personnel engaged in the Services shall be qualified to perform such Services. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant' s staff and sub- contractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services required under this Agreement. 4-
13 Consultant shall notify City of all changes in Consultant' s staff and sub- contractors, if any, assigned to perfonn the Services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance. In the event that City, in its sole discretion, at any time during the tenn of this Agreement, desires to reassign any staff or sub- contractor of Consultant, City shall give notice as set forth in Section 8.1. Consultant shall, immediately upon the receipt of the notice to re- assign staff from City, reassign such person or persons.
1.13 Independent Contractor.
A. Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee of City.
Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City. All Services provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be perfom1ed by Consultant or under its superv1s10n. Consultant will determine the means, methods, and details of performing the Services. Any additional personnel performing Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant' s exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance.
B. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Consultant' s personnel practices. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant' s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section.
1.14 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment.
The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation ofConsultant, the Consultant Representative and employees were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement.
Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the Services required hereunder without the express written approval of City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty- five percent ( 25%) of the present ownership and/ or control of Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this 5-
14 Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shall release Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City.
ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.
2.1 Contract Sum.
Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, as full compensation for Services satisfactorily rendered, City shall pay Consultant at the hourly rates set forth in the " Schedule of Compensation" attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference. In no event shall Consultant be paid more than Eighty- Eight Thousand One Hundred Forty Dollars 88, 140. 00) ( the " Contract Sum"). The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by City. Coordination of the performance of the Services with City is a critical component of the Services. If Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending those meetings.
2.2 Method of Compensation.
The method of compensation may include: ( i) a lump sum payment upon completion of the Services, ( ii) payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the Services, ( iii) payment for time and materials based upon Consultant' s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, provided that time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, but not exceeding the Contract Sum or ( iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation.
2.3 Reimbursable Expenses.
City shall only reimburse Consultant for those actual and necessary expenses expressly set forth in Exhibit C. Reimbursable expenses may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in advance, or actual sub- contractor expenses of an approved sub- contractor pursuant to Section 1.14, and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation.
2.4 Unauthorized Services and Expenses.
City will not pay for any Services or reimburse for any expenses incurred which are not specified in the Scope of Services, unless authorized in writing as set forth in Section 1.8 of this Agreement. City shall make payment for such authorized additional Services and expenses in accordance with Article 2 of this Agreement.
2.5 Invoices.
Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all Services performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month. Each such invoice shall contain all of the information set forth in Section III of Exhibit C to this Agreement. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the 6-
15 Agreement. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate Services performed by more than one person.
City shall independently review each invoice submitted by Consultant to determine whether the Services performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within thirty ( 30) days of receipt of Consultant' s correct and undisputed invoice, except as to any charges for Services performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 6.3. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City of any invoice provided by Consultant shall not constitute waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law.
2.6 Waiver.
Payment to Consultant for Services performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in Services performed by Consultant.
ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE
3.1 Time of Essence.
Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not be construed to limit or deprive a Party of the benefits of any grace or use period allowed in this Agreement.
3.2 Schedule of Performance.
Consultant shall commence the Services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all Services within the time period( s) established in the " Schedule of Performance" attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by this reference.
3.3 Force Majeure.
The time period( s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement may be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Consultant. Such unforeseeable consequences include, but are not restricted to, acts of God or public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/ or acts of any governmental agency, including City, if Consultant shall within ten ( 10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the Services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified, subject to the provisions of Section 1.8. The Contract Officer' s determination ( or the City Council' s determination, in the event the period of enforced delay exceeds the period specified in Section
1.8) shall be final and conclusive upon the Parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant 7-
16 be entitled to recover damages against City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused; Consultant' s sole remedy shall be the extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section.
3.4 Term.
The Term of this Agreement shall be from the Effective Date through June 30, 2025, unless sooner terminated as provided in Article 6 of this Agreement or extended as provided in Sections
1.8 and 3.3 of this Agreement. Maximum term and any subsequent amendment or modification shall not exceed five ( 5) years.
ARTICLE 4. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION
4.1 Minimum Scope and Limits oflnsurance.
Consultant shall procure and at all times during the term of this Agreement carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect, insurance as follows:
A. Commercial General Liability Insurance with a m1mmum limit of 1,000, 000. 00 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage and a general aggregate limit of $2,000, 000. 00 per project or location. If Consultant is a limited liability company, the commercial general liability coverage shall be amended so that Consultant and its managers, members, affiliates, employees, agents and other persons necessary or incidental to its operation are insureds.
B. Automobile Liability Insurance for any owned, non- owned or hired vehicle used in connection with the performance of this Agreement with a combined single limit of 1,000, 000. 00 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. IfConsultant does not use any owned, non- owned or hired vehicles in the performance of Services under this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain a non- owned auto endorsement to the Commercial General Liability policy.
C. Workers' Compensation Insurance as required by the State of California and Employer' s Liability Insurance with a minimum limit of $1,000, 000. 00 per accident for bodily injury or disease. If Consultant has no employees while performing Services under this Agreement, workers' compensation policy is not required; however, Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. ·
D. Professional Liability/ Errors and Omissions Insurance with minimum limits of $1,000, 000. 00 per claim and in the aggregate.
4.2 Acceptability of Insurers.
The insurance policies required under this Article shall be issued by an insurer admitted to write insurance in the State of California with a rating ofA: Vil or better in the latest 8-
17 edition ofthe A.M. Best Insurance Rating Guide. Self- insurance shall not be considered to comply with the insurance requirements under this Article.
4.3 Additional Insured.
The commercial general and automobile liability policies shall contain an endorsement naming City, its officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds.
4.4 Primary and Non- Contributing.
The insurance policies required under this Article shall apply on a primary noncontributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance available to City. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its officers, employees, agents or volunteers, shall be in excess of Consultant' s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
4.5 Consultant' s Waiver of Subrogation.
The insurance policies required under this Article shall not prohibit Consultant and Consultant' s employees, agents or sub- contractors from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives all rights of subrogation against City.
4.6 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions.
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At City' s option, Consultant shall either reduce or eliminate the deductibles or self-insured retentions with respect to City; or Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and expenses.
4.7 Cancellations or Modifications to Coverage.
Consultant shall not cancel, reduce or otherwise modify the insurance policies required by this Article during the term of this Agreement. The commercial general and automobile liability policies required under this Agreement shall be endorsed to state that should the issuing insurer cancel the policy before the expiration date, the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail 30 days' prior written notice to City. If any insurance policy required under this Article is canceled or reduced in coverage or limits, Consultant shall, within two ( 2) Business Days ( as defined in Section 8.12) of notice from the insurer, phone, fax or notify City via certified mail, return receipt requested, of the cancellation of or changes to the policy.
4.8 City Remedy for Noncompliance.
IfConsultant does not maintain the policies of insurance required under this Article in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement, or in the event any of Consultant' s policies do not comply with the requirements under this Article, City may either immediately tenninate this Agreement or, if insurance is available at a reasonable cost, City may, but has no duty to, take out the necessary insurance and pay, at Consultant' s expense, the premium thereon.
Consultant shall promptly reimburse City for any premium paid by City, or City may withhold amounts sufficient to pay the premiums from payments due to Consultant. 9-
18 4.9 Evidence of Insurance.
Prior to the perfonnance of Services under this Agreement, Consultant shall furnish the City Clerk with a certificate or certificates of insurance and all original endorsements evidencing and effecting the coverages required under this Article. The endorsements are subject to City' s approval. Consultant may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies to City. Consultant shall maintain current endorsements on file with the City Clerk.
Consultant shall provide proof to the City Clerk that insurance policies expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Consultant shall furnish such proof at least two ( 2) weeks prior to the expiration of the coverages.
4.10 Indemnity Requirements not Limiting.
Procurement of insurance by Consultant shall not be construed as a limitation of Consultant' s liability or as full performance of Consultant' s duty to indemnify City under this Agreement.
4.11 Sub- contractor Insurance Requirements.
Consultant shall require each of its sub- contractors that perform Services under this Agreement to maintain insurance coverage that meets all of the requirements of this Article.
4.12 Indemnification, Hold Harmless. and Duty to Defend.
A. Indemnification of City.
1) To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, defend, hold harmless and indemnify City and its elected officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, designated volunteers, successors, assigns and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials ( collectively " Indemnitees"), from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, expenses, judgments, penalties, liens, and losses of any nature whatsoever, including fees of accountants, attorneys, or other professionals and all costs associated therewith and the payment of all consequential damages ( collectively " Liabilities"), at law or in equity, whether actual, alleged or threatened, which arise out of, are claimed to arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts or omissions of Consultant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, sub- contractors, materialmen, consultants or their officers, agents, servants or employees ( or any entity or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of this Agreement, including the Indemnitees' active or passive negligence, except for Liabilities arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees as determined by court decision or by the agreement of the Parties. Consultant shall defend the Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any Liabilities with counsel of the Indemnitees' choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all attorneys' fees and experts' costs actually incurred in connection with such defense. Consultant shall reimburse the Indemnitees for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by Indemnitees in connection therewith.
10-
19 2) Consultant shall pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Consultant under this Agreement, and indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Consultant shall fully comply with the workers' compensation law regarding Consultant and Consultant' s employees. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Consultant to comply with applicable workers' compensation laws. City may offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant' s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this subparagraph A.2. 3) Consultant shall obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those in this Article from each and every sub- contractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Consultant in the performance of this Agreement.
If Consultant fails to obtain such indemnity obligations, Consultant shall be fully responsible and indemnify, hold harmless and defend the Indemnitees from and against any and all Liabilities at law or in equity, whether actual, alleged or threatened, which arise out of, are claimed to arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts or omissions of Consultant' s sub- contractor, its officers, agents, servants, employees, sub- contractors, materialmen, consultants or their officers, agents, servants or employees ( or any entity or individual that Consultant' s sub- contractor shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of this Agreement, including the Indemnitees' active or passive negligence, except for Liabilities arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees as determined by court decision or by the agreement of the Parties.
B. Workers' Compensation Acts not Limiting. Consultant' s indemnifications and obligations under this Article, or any other provision of this Agreement, shall not be limited by the provisions of any workers' compensation act or similar act. Consultant expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statutes or laws as to City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers.
C. Insurance Requirements not Limiting. City does not, and shall not, waive any rights that it may possess against Consultant because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. The indemnities in this Article shall apply regardless of whether or not any insurance policies are determined to be applicable to the Liabilities, tax, assessment, penalty or interest asserted against City.
D. Survival of Terms. Consultant' s indemnifications and obligations under this Article shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
ARTICLE 5. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION 5 .1 Service Records.
Consultant shall keep, and require sub- contractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and Services performed hereunder ( the " Service Records"), as shall be necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer 11-
20 to evaluate the performance of such Services. Any and all such Service Records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such Service Records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make copies and transcripts from such Service Records. Such Service Records shall be maintained for a period of three ( 3) years following completion of the Services hereunder, and City shall have access to such Service Records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant' s business, custody of the Service Records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Consultant' s successor in interest (" Consultant' s Successor"). If custody of the Service Records is given to Consultant' s Successor, Consultant shall give written notice to City of the transfer of the Service Records to Consultant' s Successor. The notice shall include contact information address and telephone number) for Consultant' s Successor, and access shall be provided to City by Consultant' s Successor.
5.2 Reports.
Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the Services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that City is greatly concerned about the cost of Services to be perfonned pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the Services contemplated herein, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of that fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto.
5.3 Ownership of Documents.
All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials ( the " Consultant Documents") prepared by Consultant, its employees, sub- contractors and agents in the perfonnance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the Consultant Documents hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed Consultant Documents for other projects and/ or use ofuncompleted Consultant Documents without specific written authorization by Consultant will be at City' s sole risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant' s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use or assignment. Consultant may retain copies of such Consultant Documents for its own use. Consultant shall have an unrestricted right to use the concepts embodied therein. All sub- contractors shall provide for assignment to City of all Consultant Documents prepared by them; and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom.
5.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information.
A. All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in perfonnance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such infonnation is in the 12-
21 public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer.
B. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or sub- contractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the Services performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered " voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
C. If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or sub- contractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorneys' fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant' s conduct.
D. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees; agents or sub- contractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any Party regarding this Agreement and the Services performed thereunder. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite the response.
ARTICLE 6. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION
6.1 California Law.
This Agreement, and any dispute arising from the relationship between the Parties to this Agreement, shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the Parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California,, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event oflitigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in Riverside.
6.2 Disputes: Default.
A. In the event that City determines Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any Services performed after the date of default. In addition to the provisions of Section 4.8, and the right to terminate pursuant to Section 6. 7, if the City Manager determines that Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, City may serve Consultant with written notice of the default. Consultant shall have ten ( 10) calendar days after service upon it of the notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. 13-
22 In the event that Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, City may, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
B. In the event of termination pursuant to this Section, City may take over the Services and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the Services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated ( provided that City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to Consultant for the purpose of set- off or partial payment of the amounts owed City as provided in Section 6.3.
6.3 Retention of Funds.
Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant whether or not arising out of this Agreement): ( i) any payment amount ofwhich may be in dispute hereunder or which is necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, ( ii) all amounts retained pursuant to the provisions of Section 4.8, (iii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant' s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant' s obligation under this Agreement, and ( iv) all payments due or that become due to Consultant during the period that Consultant or any of its sub- contractors fail to maintain any required insurance in full force and effect, until notice is received by City that the required insurance has been restored to full force and effect and that the premiums therefore have been paid for a period satisfactory to City, as provided in Section 4.9, above. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.
6.4 Waiver.
Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any tenn, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement.
Acceptance by City of any Services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non- defaulting Party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.
Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing, and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.
6.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative.
Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative and the exercise by either Party 14-
23 of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other Paiiy.
6.6 Legal Action.
In addition to any other rights or remedies, either Paiiy may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific perfonnance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Consultant must file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections 905 et seq. and 910 et seq., in order to pursue a legal action against City under this Agreement.
6.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term.
This Article 6 shall govern any termination of this Agreement except as specifically provided in Section 6.2 for termination for default of Consultant. City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty ( 30) days' written notice to Consultant, except that where termination is due to the fault of Consultant, the period of notice may be a shorter time as may be determined by the Contract Officer. In addition, Consultant reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon sixty ( 60) days' written notice to City, except that where tem1ination is due to the fault of City, the period of notice may be a shorter time as Consultant may determine. Upon receipt of any notice of tennination, Consultant shall immediately cease all Services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Except where Consultant has initiated termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all Services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any Services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 6.3. In the event Consultant has initiated termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced hereunder. In the event of tennination without cause pursuant to this Section, the tem1inating Party need not provide the non- tenninating Party with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 6.2.
6.8 Attorneys' Fees.
In any litigation or other proceeding by which a Party seeks to enforce its rights under this Agreement ( whether in contract, tort or both) or seeks a declaration of any rights or obligations under this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees. Attorneys' fees shall include attorney' s fees on any appeal, and in addition the Party entitled to attorneys' fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment. 15-
24 ARTICLE 7. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON- DISCRIMINATION 7 .1 Non- liability of City Officers and Employees.
No officer or employee of City shall be personally liable to Consultant, or Consultant' s Successor, in the event of any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Consultant or Consultant' s Successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.
7 .2 Conflict of Interest.·
Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant' s performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or sub- contractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the perfonnance of this Agreement.
No officer or employee of City shall have any direct or indirect financial interest in this Agreement within the scope of Government Code section 1090, nor shall any such officer or employee make, participate in making, or use his or her official position to influence, any City decision relating to the Agreement which has a material financial effect on his or her financial interests or the financial interests of any corporation, partnership or association in which he or she is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.
Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and sub- contractors, if any, shall comply with all conflict of interest statutes of the State of California applicable to Consultant' s Services under this Agreement, including the Political Reform Act ( Gov. Code § 81000, et seq.) and Government Code Section 1090. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant may perfo1m similar services for other clients; but Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and subcontractors shall not, without the Contract Officer' s prior written approval, perform services for another person or entity for whom Consultant is not currently performing services that would require Consultant or one of its officers, employees, associates or sub- contractors to abstain from a decision under this Agreement pursuant to a conflict of interest statute. Consultant shall incorporate a clause substantially similar to this Section into any subcontract that Consultant executes in connection with the perfonnance of this Agreement.
7.3 Covenant Against Discrimination.
Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement.
Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed, and that employees 16-
25 arc treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, or ancestry, or other protected class.
7.4 Unauthorized Aliens.
Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of Services covered by this Agreement, and should the any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by City.
ARTICLE 8. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
8.1 Notices.
Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, bill, invoice, report or other communication required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and conclusively deemed effective: ( a) on confirmed delivery by courier service or overnight delivery service during Consultant' s and City' s regular business hours; or (b) three ( 3) Business Days after deposit in the United States mail, by certified or registered mail, and addressed to the Party to be notified as set forth below:
Ifto City
With a courtesy copy to:
Ifto Consultant:
Attn: Lincoln Bogard
Deputy City Manager
City of Banning
99 East Ramsey Street
Banning, California 92220
Email: lbogard@banningca. gov
Serita R. Young, City Attorney
Richards, Watson & Gershon
350 South Grand Avenue, 37th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
Email: SYoung@rwglaw. com
Attn: Richard Brady
President
Matrix Consulting Group, LTD
1650 S. Amphlett Blvd., Suite 213
San Mateo, CA 94402
Email: rbrady@matrixcg. net
17-
26 8.2 Interpretation.
The tem1s of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either Party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.
8.3 Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument.
8.4 Integration; Amendment.
This Agreement, and all exhibits referred to in this Agreement, constitute the final, complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement between the Parties pertaining to the subject matter of this Agreement and supersede all other and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the Parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No Party has been induced to enter into this Agreement by, nor is any Party relying on, any representation or wananty except those expressly set forth in this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by Consultant and by City Council. The Parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void.
8.5 Severability.
In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jmisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the Parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either Party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.
8.6 Mutual Cooperation.
A. City' s Cooperation. City shall provide Consultant with all pertinent data, docU111ents and other requested information as is reasonably available for Consultant' s proper performance of the Services required under this Agreement.
B. Consultant' s Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to Consultant' s performance of Services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance that City requires. 18-
27 8.7 No Third Party Beneficiaries Intended.
This Agreement is made solely for the benefit of the Parties to this Agreement and their respective successors and assigns, and no other person or entity may have or acquire a right by virtue of this Agreement.
8.8 Final Payment Acceptance Constitutes Release.
The acceptance by Consultant of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of City from all claims and liabilities for compensation to Consultant for anything done, furnished or relating to Consultant' s Services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of City' s check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten ( 10) calendar days of the receipt of that check. However, approval or payment by City shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of Consultant, its employees, sub- contractors and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/ or Services performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by City for any defect or error in the Services prepared by Consultant, its employees, sub- contractors and agents.
8.9 Non- Appropriation of Funds.
Payments to be made to Consultant by City for Services performed within the current fiscal year which are within the current fiscal budget ~ nd within an available, unexhausted fund. In the event that City does. not appropriate sufficient funds for payment of Consultant' s Services beyond the current fiscal year, this Agreement shall cover payment for Consultant' s Services only to the conclusion of the last fiscal year in which City appropriates sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at the conclusion of such fiscal year.
8.10 Headings.
The headings in this Agreement are included solely for convenience of reference and shall not affect the interpretation of any provision of this Agreement or any of the rights or obligations of the Parties to this Agreement.
8.11 Word Usage.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, ( a) the words " shall," " will" and agrees" are mandatory and " may" is pennissive; ( b) " or" is not exclusive; and ( c) " includes" or including" are not limiting.
8.12 Business Days.
Business Days" refers to days that the Banning City Hall is open for business.
8.13 Corporate Authority.
The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties hereto warrant that i): such Party is duly organized and existing, ( ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver 19-
28 this Agreement on behalf of that Party, ( iii) by so executing this Agreement, such Party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and ( iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which that Party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties.
8.14 Electronic Signatures.
Each Party may adopt as its signature an electronic identification consisting of a symbol or code that is affixed to or contained in each document transmitted by such Party electronic signature"). The Parties hereto herby agree that electronic signatures are acceptable, shall have the same force and effect under the law as original wet signatures, and shall be sufficient to verify that the Parties have executed this Agreement and such other documents transmitted by the Parties.
SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
20-
29 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first hereinabove written.
CITY OF BANNING
Douglas Schulze,
City Manager
ATTEST:
Caroline Patton
Administrative City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Richards, Watson & Gershon
Serita R. Young
City Attorney
Date
Date
Date
CONSULTANT
NAME: Date
TITLE:
NAME: Date
TITLE:
Tax ID No.
Address:
City Council Approval: _____ _
NOTE: PROOF OF AUTHORITY TO BIND CONTRACTING PARTY REQUIRED. APPROPRIATE
ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF
INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT' S BUSINESS ENTITY.
21-
30 EXHIBIT " A"
SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. Consultant will perform the following Services in connection with providing services for the Comprehensive User Fee and Impact Fee Study prepared in connection therewith:
II. As part of the Services, Consultant will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products and services to City:
Exhibit " A"-1
31 EXHIBIT "A"
Proposal to Conduct a Comprehensive User Fee and Impact Fee Study A Statement of Understanding and Approach
Banning, CA
This section of our proposal demonstrates our understanding of the services requested, and describes our general approach, proposed task plan, and schedule.
Approach
The Matrix Consulting Group works with various clients ranging from small towns to major metropolitan cities in over 45 states across the U.S. and Canada. Every project is unique but is managed according to the following essential project approach:
Understanding City-specific financial data .
Working collaboratively wtih City staff through meetings and workshops .
Applying industry standards, best management practices, and technical expertise for cost allocation and fee application .
Calculating defensible results with buy-in from internal and external stakeholders .
Providing recommendations and transferring knowledge and work products to City staff for successful implementation .
The approach chosen for completing this project allows us to deliberately review and categorize the allowability of indirect costs as well as determine the best and most tangible metrics for allocation.
Quality Control
We believe very strongly in the science of our craft, especially as it relates to cost of service studies. As such, our firm utilizes quality control techniques which include:
Project Management: Ensuring our projects meet the needs and timelines of our clients are accomplished through the following :
The project manager and lead analyst develop general and project specific data collection plans and interview guides .
Matrix Consulting Group
Exhibit "A" - 2
32 EXHIBIT "A"
Proposal to Conduct a Comprehensive User Fee and Impact Fee Study Banning, CA All project work activities are defined in advance and tied to each project team member, deliverables, the schedule, and the budget.
We have frequent client review meetings to discuss the quality and direction of the project through interim deliverables and draft documents .
Quantitative Results: Financial analyses are used to develop budgets and projections, and often are subject to public oversight and review. For this reason, our firm ensures data determined quality control through the following :
Expenditure data entered into cost models are tied to budget documents .
Workload is used to cross-check true cost associated with services.
These project management approaches have resulted in all our projects being delivered at a high level of quality, on time and on budget.
Tasks
The City Banning is requesting two scopes of work: 1) Comprehensive User Fee Study; and 2) Development Impact Fee Study. These scopes of work can be conducted concurrently as there are economies of scale that can be achieved. The following subsections outline the tasks broken out by project-wide tasks, comprehensive user fee study tasks, and developrnent impact fee tasks .
Project- wide Tasks
There are three key tasks that would span both scopes and then the tasks would vary based upon each scope of work . The following tasks would be conducted for all scopes of work .
Task 1 Data Collection
Prior to any initial meetings, the Matrix Consulting Group will provide the City with a list of initial data requirements for the study. This will allow our project team to review this information thoroughly in preparation for initial discussions with staff. A common list of data collection items include:
Budgeted Expenditures per Fund and Department.
Staffing per Fund and Department.
List of current fees to be included in the scope .
List of all current city owned infrastructure and equipment Matrix Consulting Group
Exhibit "A" - 3
2 33
EXHIBIT " A"
Proposal to Conduct a Comprehensive User Fee and Impact Fee Study Banni ng, CA Copy of City' s most recent General Plan, Land Use and Housing Elements .
Copy of any previous studies / analyses.
List of comparable jurisdictions for the comparative analysis.
The provision of these items will allow our project team to familiarize themselves with the City' s structure.
Deliverable List of basic data requirements for the Study Meetings None
Estimated City Support 2-4 hours for staff to collect and distribute information Task2 Study Objectives and Project Schedule
Once the data has been collected, the project team will then meet with designated City staff to discuss any issues identified by the project team, as well as to clarify any existing issues or concerns held by the City regarding the current user fee study and impact fee study methodology. Discussions will include :
Review of the City 's specific needs and critical issues surrounding development and implementation of the user fee and development impact fee study.
Opportunities for improvement and restructuring of previous fee analyses.
Discussion of cost recovery goals and targets, as well as infrastructure needs for the City.
At the culmination of the meeting, the project team and the designated City staff will leave with a greater understanding of the overall approach and methodology that will be taken by the project team to conduct the comprehensive fee and impact fee study for the City.
Meetings Kickoff
Estimated City Support 1 hour for all involved City Departments Task3 Implementation and Future Support
The Matrix Consulting Group is committed to helping our clients develop accurate and defensible cost- of- service methodologies and ensure that they can implement the results of these studies appropriately. Our project team will work with City staff to facilitate an understanding of the results and how to incorporate those results into budget and policy documents, informational handouts, and other City materials .
Matrix Consulting Group 3
Exhibit " A" - 4
34 EXHIBIT "A"
Proposal to Conduct a Comprehensive User Fee and Impact Fee Study Banning, CA Our Client support continues even after a final report has been issued . We understand that questions can arise about the development of a study well after project completion and are committed to working with our clients to answer any questions about methodologies and applications of results. This support is provided to our clients at no extra cost.
Comprehensive User Fee Study Tasks
The City of Banning is requesting a comprehensive fee analysis . The purpose of these studies is to ensure compliance with existing state rules and regulations as well as future pending state rules and regulations . The following tasks provide an overview of the level of detail utilized to conduct the comprehensive fee study.
Task 1 Develop a Schedule of Current and Potential Fees for Service The project team will work with staff to review their current fee schedules in line-item detail. This meeting is critical in ensuring staff can incorporate any updates or changes to the fee study based on code, regulation, staffing, process, or technological changes.
The focus of this meeting will be the following:
Renaming fees: Rewording or renaming fees to identify services more clearly.
Eliminating fees: Removing any outdated services or fees.
Adding new fees: Capturing any new services or breaking out existing fee categories to identify all the services being provided by City staff more clearly and identify potential fees for services that the City would like to provide.
Recategorization of fees: Collapsing or expanding multiple fee ranges to better capture the services provided. For example, eliminate lot ranges or acreages if those do not impact the review amount, but add categories based upon the approval level (i.e ., Commission vs. Director level).
It is important to note that this meeting occurs first to ensure that any significant proposed structural changes are captured prior to collecting time estimate information or developing draft fee results . However, there is the ability to make future adjustments.
I • • • • • •
Estimated City Support • • . • .• t .•.
Matrix Consulting Group 4
Exhibit "A" - 5
35 EXHIBIT " A"
Proposal to Conduct a Comprehensive User Fee and Impact Fee Study Task2 Conduct Time Data Gathering Workshops
Banning, CA
The project team will conduct workshops to gather time estimates for each service included in the study, interview key personnel from each department, and analyze the various activities being performed . Below is an example of the steps involved in permit processing and the time associated with each step .
Intake
Permit Tech:
15 mins
Routing
Permit Tech:
10 min s
Initial Review
Plan Checker
1 hour
Final Review
Plan Checker:
30 mins
Issue Permit
Permit Tech:
15 mins
Basic process steps in application/ permit processing will be documented and provided in detail for each department/ division represented in the study. The project team will try to minimize the impact on staff by incorporating any baseline assumptions from prior city studies.
The project team will conduct multiple time estimate workshop( s) for each department/ division included in the study, and the workshop results will be Excel-based workbook( s) that staff can review. Staff will be provided time for any edits or comments on time estimate information .
I • • • ••
Estimated City Support 1-4 hours per involved Department Task3 Develop Fully Burdened Hourly Rates
Based on the City's staffing and budget information, the project team will calculate fully burdened hourly rates, including direct and indirect costs. The following points highlight the cost components and factors included in fully burdened rates:
Direct costs: This component accounts for salary and benefits associated with each employee or position and reflects City staffing and salary reports.
Indirect costs - Departmental: This component accounts for administrative and management support provided to line-level staff, as well as operational services and supplies that are used in the execution of job duties. This cost component is developed through interviews with staff and an analysis of budgets.
Matrix Consulting Group 5
Exhibit " A" - 6
36 EXHIBIT "A"
Proposal to Conduct a Comprehensive User Fee and Impact Fee Study Banning, CA Indirect costs - Citywide: This component accounts for citywide support such as Finance, HR, and Attorney support provided by other departments. If an overhead rate or cost is unavailable, one will be calculated to apply to different services .
Once the cost components have been documented and developed, the project team will review MOUs and talk with departmental staff to determine appropriate productive hour calculations. These reduced available hours will ensure that fully burdened hourly rates account for leave accruals (holiday, vacation, and sick) and any meetings or training .
I :. . . . . . . .
Estimated City Support 1 hour for Finance
Task4 Perform Total Cost Analysis
The Matrix Consulting Group's costing model is built based on the City's operations, budget details, and intended uses for the results. This method is a customized approach specific to each jurisdiction for cost analysis of user fee services . It is a "bottom-up" approach , the most defensible methodology for calculating user fees. The methodology incorporates the time estimate information and fully burdened hourly rate information.
The following graphic shows the cost calculation:
Fully
Burdened
Rate
This costing method uses time and annual activity level data to establish the cost of providing services on both a unit and an annual level. Once the time spent for a fee activity is determined for each individual or position, the team uses its fee and rate software to apply the fully burdened hourly rates calculated in the previous task .
Resulting costs are presented on a unit and annual level and are compared to the existing fee schedule and revenue reports. The City will obtain detailed information regarding cost recovery surpluses and deficits on both a detailed (per unit) and global (annualized) level, as well as an understanding of cost components for each service.
Deliverable Per Unit and Annual Fee Study Results
I • • ... •
Estimated City Support • • • • •••
Matrix Consulting Group 6
Exhibit "A" - 7
37 EXHIBIT "A"
Proposal to Conduct a Comprehensive User Fee and Impact Fee Study Banni ng, CA Task 5 Conduct a Market Rate Survey
We will work with the City to identify jurisdictions in Riverside and San Bernardino counties to conduct a comparative survey of fees. This comparative survey activity will include:
Developing fee scenarios for each department included in the study to be compared to other jurisdictions.
Graphing the results of the fee analysis for easy visual comparison purposes. 8,000.00
7,000.00
6,000.00
5,000 .00
4,000.00
3,000 .00
2 ,000 .00
1,000.00
0 .00
Single Family Home - New Permit and Plan Check Fees
iii
0 0
0 a.
E
0 u
N "'
a. a.
E E
0 0
u
a.
E
0 Permit
Plan Check
a.
E
0 Collecting contextual information such as population size, budget, staffing, last time fee study was done, and last fee schedule update.
As market surveys do not provide adequate or objective information about the relationship between a jurisdiction's costs and fees, these steps ensure we provide the City with the most information possible.
Deliverable
Estimated City Support
I • • • • •
N,;:me · . . .•
Task 6 Review/ Revise Fee Study Results
Because the analysis of service fees is based on estimates and information provided by City staff, all participants must be comfortable with our methodology and the data they have provided. Once the department agrees that the analysis reflects the reasonable costs of providing services, City management can review the results. At this point, the Matrix Consulting Group 7
Exhibit "A" - 8
38 EXHIBIT "A"
Proposal to Conduct a Comprehensive User Fee and Impact Fee Study Banning, CA project team will provide City staff with Recommended Fee Workbooks . The Recommended Fee Workbooks will provide departments / divisions with the fee study results in MS Excel. The following shows an example of the workbook:
Current - Per Unit Results
Surplus/( Deficit) Cost Recovery
Fee Title Current Fee Total Cost Per Unit %
Lot Line Adjustment $ 900 $ 1,557 ($ 657) 58%
Temporary Use Permit $ 40 $ 325 ($ 285) 12%
Recommended Fee
Change to Recommended
Recommended Recommended % Change to Fee Cost
Fee Title Fee Fee Recommended Fee Recovery%
Lot Line Adjustment $ 1,200 $ 300 33% 77%
Temporary Use Permit $ 100 $ 60 150% 31%
Recommended Fee Annual
Potential
Revenue at Revenue at Change in
Fee Title Workload Current Fee Recommended Fee Revenue
Lot Line Adjustment 4 $ 3,600 $ 4,800 $ 1,200
Temporary Use Permit 60 $ 2,400 $ 6,000 $ 3,600 --
TOTAL $ 6,000 $ 10, 800 $ 4,800
As the graphic indicates, the recommended fee workbook allows the City to input information into the Recommended Fee column and see its impacts, such as the dollar increase, percentage increase, and what percentage of their current costs they will recover. Additionally, the workbook allows the City to calculate potential increases or declines in revenue because of the recommended fees .
I . . • Recommended Fee Workbooks
Estimated City Support
Task 7 Prepare a Draft User Fee Study Report
Upon conclusion of the fee study, we will prepare a detailed report summarizing the results of each of the previous work tasks described above . This report will include:
A concise executive summary discussing the study, methodology, results, and narrative describing the services included in the study.
A section on proposed modifications to the current fee schedule, including removal or addition of new fees for service.
Matrix Consulting Group 8
Exhibit "A" - 9
39 EXHIBIT " A"
Proposal to Conduct a Comprehensive User Fee and Impact Fee Study Banning, CA A section on per unit and annual results for each fee is included in the analysis, as well as where workload data is available.
A comparative survey section outlining key fees, their comparison to other local jurisdictions, and contextual information regarding budget, staffing, and when they last conducted fee studies .
The draft report will be provided to City staff for comments.
Task8 Finalize Fee Study Report
Any edits or revisions to the draft user fee study report will be incorporated into the finalized fee study report. This finalized fee study report will include all elements of the draft fee study report and any additional cost recovery considerations and policy considerations for the council' s review.
None . . ·
I[,. .U • , _. 4' ' I I • ~ 1 t • •
Task9 Master Fee Schedule
Once the final user fee study report is approved, the project team will develop a master fee schedule, consolidating all fees in a singular location . The master fee schedule will include a numbering system, the department name, the fee title, the unit of application, the current fee, the total cost per unit calculated through the study, the difference, the cost recovery, the relevant rule/ regulation that applies to the fee type, the staff recommended fee, and staff recommended cost recovery level. This attachment is extremely helpful as part of the staff report provided to the Board of Supervisors upon adoption .
I
Estimated City Supp_Q..rt. .. :
Task 1O I Present the Final Report to Key Stakeholders
The presentation of results to City officials and/ or stakeholders is critical to the success of the overall engagement. Because the product from the study is often controversial, the objective of this final step is to present a succinct summary that provides decision Matrix Consulting Group 9
Exhibit " A" - 10
40 EXHIBIT " A"
Proposal to Conduct a Comprehensive User Fee and Impact Fee Study Banning, CA makers with key information. The Matrix Consulting Group will attend and present the Study at up to three ( 3) Committee or Council meetings, including any fee adoption hearings . We believe that these number of meetings is typically sufficient to ensure that there is buy-in from the stakeholders.
Even though the User Fee and Impact fee study are being conducted concurrently, we would recommend separating the stakeholder presentations to ensure appropriate understanding .
Deliverable Presentation
Meetings 1-3 City Committee/ Commission / Council Meetings Estimated City Support 1-2 hours for Presentation Review Task 11 I Excel- Based Models and Training
The City of Banning has requested an excel-based model for updating the user fee study.
Our Excel-based models would provide the ability for the City to adapt and continuously update results from year to year as the organization changes.
After the final drafts are approved, at the discretion of City staff, the project team would meet with and train designated City employees on use of the models. Staff will be provided with training, which walks through the model tabs, includes instructions tab in the model, and discusses specific customizations made for the City.
Deliverable Study Model, Backup Documentation, User Guide Meetings Model Training
Estimated City Support 2 hours for Training Attendance
Development Impact Fee Study Tasks
The City of Banning is also interested in conducting a Development Impact Fee Study.
These fee studies must be in compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act ( AB1600 and AB602), which require that there is an appropriate nexus to.establish the impact fees. The following tasks provide an overview of our process for conducting the nexus analysis .
Task 1 Review of Impact Fees
The purpose of this task is to develop an initial understanding of the City's proposed impact fee structure, projected growth levels, and any future developments that will impact that population growth. During this phase, the project team will document the following :
Name of Proposed Impact Fee
Matrix Consulting Group 10
Exhibit "A" - 11
41 EXHIBIT " A"
Proposal to Conduct a Comprehensive User Fee and Impa ct Fee Study Municipal Ordinance/ Resolution authorizing the fee
Capital or Master Plan to support the fee
Purpose of the fee
Banning, CA
This documentation will be critical to ensuring that any updates to the Impact fee program comply with AB1600 and AB602 . This documentation will serve as the basis for the project team's discussion with city staff on next steps for evaluating impact fees .
Meetings Impact Fee Current State Discussion
Estimated City Support 1-2 hours for Meeting Attendance Task2 Projected Population Growth and Facility Needs
The key component of any impact fee analysis is determining the proportionality and nexus that exists based upon projected development. During this task, the project team will conduct research based upon regional forecasted growth as well as internal City staff Planning) expected growth to determine future population projection .
Based upon that future population projection, the project team would review the City's current infrastructure inventory and determine if there is any need for additional equipment or new facilities. The project team will also meet with staff to identify any master plans in existence at the time of the creation / development of impact fees . This will require meeting with relevant City department staff to review all equipment and identifying the quantity and cost estimates for these items .
Impact fees cannot be used to enhance existing service levels, only maintain current service levels . During this task, the project team will ensure that for defensibility purposes any new facilities or equipment identified are directly correlated to population increases .
Meetings 1-2 Meetings for Infrastructure Needs
Estimated City Support 1-3 hours for Population Projection Discussions Task3 Draft Impact Fee Analysis
The largest proportion of the impact fee analysis is the growth and facilities projection.
Once that task is completed and a nexus can be established that is based upon City adopted master plans the project team will work on calculating the draft impact fees.
There are two components to the calculation of impact fees: the total cost of facilities and their cost basis . The following points describe these components:
Matrix Consulting Group 11
Exhibit " A" - 12
42 EXHIBIT " A"
Proposal to Conduct a Comprehensive User Fee and Impact Fee Study Banning, CA Total Cost of the Facilities/ Infrastructure: There are three different subcomponents that comprise the maximum cost of the facilities that can be used for the calculation of impact fees: cost of facilities/ infrastructure, administrative cost, and offsetting credits/ revenues.
Cost Basis: There are several different cost bases that can be used for the calculation of impact fees, such as population, housing units, workload, etc .
Based on data provided by the City, as well as appropriate and preferred cost bases, and State law, the project team will calculate the draft Impact Fees. The project team will meet with City staff to review these draft impact fees based upon land use type.
Deliverable Draft lmP- act F.ee
Meetings 1-2 Draft Meeting Results
Estimated City Support 1-2 hours per Impact Fee Department Task4 Comparative Impact Fee Survey
The project team will conduct a comparison of the full cost of Impact Fees and the recommended Impact Fee to other jurisdictions in Riverside and San Bernardino counties .
This comparison will be conducted based upon construction project types, ( i.e ., new single- family home, new hotel, new multi- family, etc .). The use of construction scenarios provides staff with a comparison of the impact of the fee upon future development.
Deliverable Impact Fee Comparative Survey Results
Meetings Fee Comparison Meeting with City Department( s) Estimated City Support 1-2 hours for City Departments
Tasks Draft Impact Fee Report
The draft impact fee results and comparative survey will be incorporated into a draft impact fee report. The draft impact fee report will have the following components :
Executive Summary: Providing a brief overview of the background of the scope, the overall methodology, the results of the analysis, and the implementation guidelines ( including future fee increases).
Legal Framework: This will outline the current legal requirements for impact fees, and how the proposed impact fee will meet these requirements.
Growth Projections: This section of the report outlines the growth projections.
Impact Fee Analysis: This section demonstrates the calculation used to derive the full cost of the impact fees, as well as the recommended fees by the City.
Matrix Consulting Group 12
Exhibit " A" - 13
43 EXHIBIT " A"
Proposal to Conduct a Comprehensive User Fee and Impact Fee Study Banning, CA Comparative Survey: This section outlines how the City's calculated and recommended fees compare to other jurisdictions.
These components will result in a consolidated draft report that will be distributed City staff for review. It will be required to be reviewed by all the different departments to ensure that assumptions are presented accurately.
Deliverable Draft Impact Fee Report
Meetings None
Estimated City Support 1-2 hours for Report Review
Task6 Final Report
Based upon City staff comments, the project team will revise the Final Report to ensure all comments and concerns are captured. This final report will serve as the basis for presentations to internal and external stakeholders .
Deliverable Final Impact Fee Report
Meetings None
Estimated City Support None
Task 7 Present the Final Report to Key Stakeholders
The presentation of results to City officials and/ or stakeholders is critical to the success of the overall engagement. For this particular component of the study, we would recommend involving any local development community as well to ensure that there is buy-in from external stakeholders. We are committed to presenting the findings of the analysis at up to three ( 3) City Committee / Council meetings as well as to the development community. This number of meetings we believe is typically sufficient to ensure implementation of impact fees.
Deliverable Presentation
Meetings 1-3 City Committee/ Council / External Stakeholder Meetings Estimated City Support 1-2 hours for Presentation Review Task 8 Delivery of Impact Fee Backup Documentation
Unlike other cost of services analyses, the components of an impact fee should not be updated annually, as it is primarily based upon population projections and timeframe s associated with replacement of existing facility and equipment inventory and / or acquiring new facilities or inventory.
Matrix Consulting Group 13
Exhibit " A" - 14
44 EXHIBIT " A"
Proposal to Conduct a Comprehensive User Fee and Impact Fee Study Banning, CA When discussing the draft impact fee results with City staff, the project team will share the initial Excel workbook showing calculations, and at the conclusion of the study, the project team will provide the City with the backup workbook showing all calculations. In this workbook, the project team would also set up a template allowing the City to update its impact fees based upon a cost factor. The industry standard for updating impact fees is based upon the construction cost index ( CCI). This standard is used as the costs for impact fees are based upon infrastructure rather than labor or material costs .
Deliverable Final Backup Documentation ·
Meetings None
Estimated City Support None
Project Schedule
Studies of this nature typically take approximately 6 months ( 24 weeks) to complete. The following table outlines our proposed project schedule on a task-by-task basis .
Task
Project Wide Tasks
Data Collection
Study Objectives
User Fee Study Tasks
Current & Potential Fees
Data Workshops
Fully Burdened Hourly Rates
Total Cost Analysis
Comparative Survey
Review/ Revise Results
Draft Fee Study Report
Prepare Final Report
Develop Master Fee Schedule
Development Impact Fee Study
Review of Impact Fees
Projected Growth and Needs
Draft Fees Analysis
Comparative Survey
Draft Report
Final report
1 2
Month
3 4 5 6
The 6-month timeline is for completing the analysis, the implementation options and presentations as well as any excel -based models and training and backup documentation Matrix Consulting Group 14
Exhibit " A" - 15
45 EXHIBIT "A"
Proposal to Conduct a Comprehensive User Fee and Impact Fee Study Banning, CA would be provided after 6 months . If the City were to commence this project in the summer, the analysis would be completed by the end of the calendar year, with the first quarter of 2025 being used for presentations and implementation.
Alternatively, we understand that the City is in the midst of completing several master plans, as such we are open to a longer timeline, wherein the User Fee Study is completed first, and then the Development Impact Fee study is started . In that case, each study will roughly take approximately 4-6 months to complete individually.
City Staff Support
We envision a close working relationsh ip with the City throughout the project. We place a strong emphasis on transparency and robust communication. Meticulously reviewing all information and metrics is our standard practice, with a primary focus on verifying inputs before arriving at any final decisions . While we will do our best to minimize impacts on City staff, for example by taking responsibility for data gathering and cleanup, we are committed to reviewing and verifying the outcomes of the data . This commitment to precision, establishes a foundation of data integrity and trust. This approach ensures that our joint efforts consistently yield effective results and outcomes that will benefit the City.
To ensure these effective outcomes we will set up bi -weekly (every 2 weeks) updates with the City. These updates can be in the form of a brief meeting or a summary status email which outlines the work completed to date, the current tasks being performed, and any future tasks. These communications allow us to keep the City informed of any hurdles in completing the project, as well as allow staff to provide input on any key findings from the fee study analysis.
Industry Innovations and Emerging Trends
Matrix Consulting Group prides itself on providing its clients with real world solutions that incorporate new ideas , with a focus on ease of implementation . Our staff are encouraged and financially supported to participate in industry conferences and events, learning about emerging challenges and proposed solutions. Our staff also have access to vast industry networks, engaging in discussions about new solutions to old problems, as well as well future issues expected to arise .
While innovation is encouraged, our project teams are mindful of client needs and limitations. While we will explore all solution options, ultimately, our recommendations will be guided by what's best for our client, not the newest trend.
The City has requested a comprehensive impact fee analysis . Depending upon the City 's projected growth and master plans there may not be a nexus. The Matrix Consulting Group does offer an alternative task plan for impact fee studies that is broken into phases .
Matrix Consulting Group 15
Exhibit "A" - 16
46 EXHIBIT " A"
Proposal to Conduct a Comprehensive User Fee and Impact Fee Study Banning, CA Phase 1 would evaluate whether there is an appropriate nexus based upon growth and infrastructure need . If there is a nexus, then Phase 2 would be initiated, which is the calculation of the maximum justifiable impact fees . This can be a cost -effective approach for clients who may be unsure of future growth, as if there is no nexus then no Phase 2 is initiated and there are no charges for that component of the nexus fee analysis . Due to the City's anticipated growth, we haven't proposed this task plan, but if the City were interested, we would be open to presenting this alternative task plan to allow for potential cost-savings for the City.
City-Owned Facilities or Properties
The Matrix Consulting Group does not propose to use any City owned facilities to provide these services.
Matrix Consulting Group 16
Exhibit "A" - 17
47 III. In addition to the requirements of Parts I and II of this Scope of Services, during the performance of the Services, Consultant will keep City appraised through periodic status reports regarding the performance of the Services under this Agreement as set forth below and in Section 5.2, by the following means:
a. In- person meetings and/ or teleconferences.
b. Email updates/ questions to applicant team and City while reviews are underway:
c. Conference calls.
IV. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by City. If the City determines that any work product is unacceptable, for any reason, it must be revised by Consultant without additional charge to City until found satisfactory and accepted by City.
Exhibit " A"- 18
48 EXHIBIT " B"
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
None
Exhibit " B"- 1
49 EXHIBIT " C"
SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
I. Consultant shall perform the following tasks (" Tasks") at the following rates stated in Exhibit A and Exhibit C-1
II. Within the budgeted amounts for each Task, and with the approval of the Contract Officer, funds may be shifted from one Task sub- budget to another so long as the Contract Sum is not exceeded per Section 2.1, unless Additional Services are approved per Section 1.8.
III. City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include:
A. Line items for all personnel describing the Services performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate.
B. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services.
C. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation.
D. Line items for all approved sub- contractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services.
IV. Consultant' s billing rates for all personnel are attached as Exhibit C-1.
Exhibit " C" -1 .
50 EXHIBIT " C-1 "
CONSULTANT ' S BILLING RATE AND TASK SCHEDULE
matrix
co nsuIting gro up
Barbara Mason, Purchas ing ~ anager
City of Bann ing
99 IE. Ramsey Street
Bann ing , CA 92220
Dear Ms . Mason:
Apr il 22, 20 24
The M atr ix Consu lt ing Gro up proposes to erfo rm t he tas s and serv ices assoc1a ed with con diucting t he com preh s ive fe-e s d'J andl deve lopment imp,act ~ee study , or a t otal not-to-exceed fee of $88, 140 . TIile follow1n g1tab le prov iaes a breakdow n of hours by earn m embe an.a cost s for eac h tas area to oo n auct t he requested scope of ser, iio es.
Project- Wide Tasks
Oat a Co llect ion
Stud :,, ob ·e.cti",•e!i>
l'.roject--Wide Su6rotal
Comprehe.nsi\/e Fee Study Tasks
Current & Poten a IFees
eYiew/ Re·~h e Res,u l-.'!i
Dra Fee Stud :,, Re on
repare · in al Repon
De-ve lop .~ast.er Fee Sche u e
Pres t .at · on of Fe-e 'Re'.> Its
Excel l\i ode-I & Trainin g
De\/ elopment Fee Study Tasks
eYiew oz Impact Fees
roj ecte Sro·wth an d Nee s
Draft Fees Analysis
Com parat ·ye Sur.,,e.y
Draft Report.
Fi nal re pon
Presen .a · on of Fe-e es Its
IBac kup Docum ta ·on
T ot al J-lours
Fee Stud)' Su6rotal'
DIF Srudy Su6roral
li'roj-ect
Mana ger
2 4
4 4
4 4
2 70
a
2 3
a
1 •
Hi
110
186
A.naly'!it
8 10
36 24
10 2.4
10 22
0 8
ff58
16 22
32 2.8
10 0
8 124
1650 S A.mpt lull Bl\'l.l .. Su1l~ 21 3 San \ 1Jlt' u, CA 94402 65C.85 8 050 7 SF B,. y ,\ l!<l I e~ dq ua1!i,1 9 ;. Ch 111 lu tl1! D1> I ~-. F~ I M) I!'> h-.11 1, P~, t a11 J . SI L:}u s Exhibit " C -1 "- l
To1al Co !i.1.
S1 ,380
S1 ,260
S I ,S.60
S2: 160
S2. 460
8 ,280
S4 .D80
S3 ,900
S6 ,Cl00
S2 .460
S3, 780
S3 ,840
s1 :00
S4 ,320
S6 ,Cl00
10, 500
S6 , 2.0
S8 ,Clt40
S3 ,900
S3 ,840
S1 ,680
51 Ho urly at eT ot al Pro s-.;; o na l Fe-es
Tota l Proj ect Cost
Project
a nag,er
24 44,64 0
Ana lyst
s·,so
43,500
To1.a l Cost
88 ,UO
88 ,1 40
The City w i11be prov iaedl w it h imp leme at io n ass istan ce an a future project SlilJllPOrt at no ada it io a l cost.
Our typ· cal p ra ct ice is t o b ill 1for hours orked m on h ly, w· h · r oo n acts set up as f ixea not- t o-ex ceed pr ice cont racts . . e are ope n to b ill in g on a task or de liverab le bas is as we ll. rr
Richard Brady, Pr,es idernt
Matrix. Consu ing Group. Ltd.
Exhibit " C -l "-2
52 EXHIBIT " D"
SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
I. Consultant shall perform all Services timely, and deliver the specified tangible work products to City in accordance with the schedule attached as Exhibit D-1.
II. The Contract Officer may approve extensions for performance of the Services in accordance with Sections 1.8 and 3.3.
Exhibit " D" - 1
53 Project Schedu le
EXHIBIT " D-1 "
PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE
St udi es of this nat ure typically ta ke app roximat ely 6 mont hs (24 wee ks) to com plet e. The followi ng tab le outlin es ou r propose d project sch edule on a tas k-by-task basis.
Task
Project Wide Tasks
Dat a Collectio n
Study Object ives
User Fee Study Tasks
Cllrrent & Pot ential Fees
Dat a Workshops
Ful!ly Burd ened Hou rly Rates
Total Cost Ana lys is
Comparative Survey
Rev iew/ Revise Results
Draft Fee Study Report
Prepare Final Repo rt
Deve lo Mast er Fee Schedu le
Deve lopme nt Impact Fee Study
Rev iew of Impact Fees
Projected Growth and Needs
Draft Fees Analysis
Comp arative Survey
Draft Report
Fina l report
1 2
Ex hib it " D- 1 "- I
Month
3 4 5 6
54 RESOLUTION 2019- 13
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BANNING, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE STUDY REPORT DATED
JANUARY 2, 2019, ADOPTING AN UPDATED MASTER
USER FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE FOLLOWING CITY
DEPARTMENTS AND FEE GROUPS: FINANCE AND
ADMINISTRATION; ANIMAL CONTROL; COMMUNITY
SERVICES; AIRPORT; BUILDING; PLANNING; UTILITY
BILLING; ELECTRIC UTILITY; POLICE; FIRE; AND
ENGINEERING, MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION
UNDER CEQA, AND REPEALING PROVISIONS OF
RESOLUTIONS ESTABLISHING OR MODIFYING USER
FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES
WHEREAS, in adopting Chapter 3.6 of Title 3 of the Banning Municipal Code ( the Municipal Code"), the City Council of the City of Banning ( the " City Council" of the "City") established the requirement for the ascertainment and recovery of costs reasonably borne, from fees and charges levied therefore, in providing the regulation, products, and services enumerated in Chapter 3. 36;
WHEREAS, Section 3.6. 040 of the Municipal Code directs the City Manager to annually/ seasonally review fees and charges to recover the percentage of costs reasonably borne in providing the regulation, products or services enumerated in Chapter
3.6 and recommend changes to the City Council for adoption; WHEREAS, the fees set forth in the Section 3.6. 080 of the Municipal Code are less than the City' scurrent cost of providing: development services ( including planning related services, such as zoning variances, zoning changes, use permits, building inspections, building permits, the processing of maps under the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act ( Gov. Code, § 66410 et seq.), and planning services under the authority of Chapter 3 (" Local Planning") of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code 65100 et seq.) or under any other authority); public safety services; parks and recreation services; utility and enterprise services; maintenance services; and finance and administrative services;
WHEREAS, Section 66014 of the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code, § 66000 et seq.) authorizes the City to impose fees for zoning variances, zoning changes, use permits, building inspections, building permits, the processing of maps under the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act ( Gov. Code, § 66410 et seq.), and planning services under the authority of Chapter 3 (" Local Planning") of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code 65100 et seq.) or under any other authority, provided those fees do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged; 1 55
WHEREAS, Section 66013 of the Mitigation Fee Act further authorizes the City to impose fees for water or sewer connections provided those fees do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged; WHEREAS, the Mitigation Fee Act requires that the City prepare a fee study that complies with Government Code Section 66016, and demonstrates that the proposed new fees and increases in existing fees do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide the services for which the fees are levied;
WHEREAS, Willdan Finance Services has prepared the Comprehensive User Fee Study Report dated January 2, 2019 ( the " User Fee Study'). The User Fee Study sets forth the methodologies for determining the estimated amount required to provide certain regulations, products, and services for which the proposed user fees and service charges will be levied ( see page 8), describes the amount of cost, or estimated cost, required to provide certain regulations, products, and services for which the proposed user fees or service charges will be levied ( see Appendix A) and the revenue sources anticipated to provide the regulations, products, and services, including General Fund revenues ( see pages 10- 11), and otherwise satisfies the requirements of the law and the Mitigation Fee Act, with regard to the imposition and collection of certain user fees and service charges; WHEREAS, the City has made the User Fee Study available for public inspection and has published and mailed notices of the public hearing to consider the adoption of the proposed updated Master Fee Schedule in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act; WHEREAS, Section 66016( b) of the Mitigation Fee Act provides that any action by a local agency to levy a new fee or service charge or to approve an increase in an existing fee or service charge shall be taken only by ordinance or resolution; WHEREAS, on September 10, 2019, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider proposed amendments to BMC Chapter 3. 36, the approval of a Comprehensive User Fee Study Report prepared by Willdan Financial Services and dated January 2, 2019, and the adoption of an updated Master User Fee Schedule for the following City departments and fee groups: Finance and Administration; Animal Control; Community Services; Airport; Building; Planning; Utility Billing; Electric Utility; Police; Fire; and Engineering. Following the receipt of testimony, the City Council continued the matter off -calendar and forwarded the proposed updated Master User Fee Schedule to the Council' s Budget & Finance Committee for further review and recommendations;
WHEREAS, on October 22, 2019, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider proposed amendments to BMC Chapter 3. 36, the approval of a Comprehensive User Fee Study Report prepared by Willdan Financial Services and dated January 2, 2019, and the adoption of an updated Master User Fee Schedule for the following City departments and fee groups: Finance and Administration; Animal Control; Community Services; Airport; Building; Planning; Utility Billing; Electric Utility; Police; Fire; and Engineering. Following the receipt of testimony, and upon staff' recommendation, the City Council again forwarded the proposed updated Master User 2 56
Fee Schedule to the Council' sBudget & Finance Committee for further review and recommendations;
WHEREAS, on December 10, 2019, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider proposed amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 3. 36, the approval of the User Fee Study, and the adoption of an updated Master User Fee Schedule for the following City departments and fee groups: Finance and Administration; Animal Control; Community Services; Airport; Building; Planning; Utility Billing; Electric Utility; Police; Fire; and Engineering; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Banning does hereby resolve, determine, find, and order as follows:
SECTION 1: ADOPTION AND INCORPORATION OF RECITALS
The findings and recitals set forth above are true and correct, and are incorporated herein.
SECTION 2: ENVIRONMENTAL EXEMPTION
The adoption of Ordinance No. 1553, the User Fee Study, and the proposed user fees and service charges specified in this Resolution, was reviewed in accordance with the criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (" CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines. The City Council finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1553, the User Fee Study, and the proposed user fees and service charges specified in this Resolution do not constitute a " project" under CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15378( b)( 4) because these actions involve the creation of a government funding mechanism which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. In addition, the City Council finds that these actions are statutorily exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15273( a)( 1) and ( a)( 2) because these actions are establishing fees to meet operating expenses, including employee wage rates and fringe benefits, and to purchase and/ or lease supplies, equipment, and materials. The City Council hereby directs City staff to file the Notice of Exemption, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit B, with the County Clerk pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15062 within five ( 5) days of the date that this Resolution is adopted.
SECTION 3: ADOPTION OF STUDY
The City Council hereby approves the Comprehensive User Fee Study Report prepared by Wilidan Financial Services and dated January 2, 2019, and the findings contained therein. The City Council further adopts the methodology set forth in the User Fee Study page 8) for calculating and collecting the user fees and service charges adopted herein.
A copy of the User Fee Study shall be on file with the City Clerk and available during regular City business hours for public inspection.
3 57
SECTION 4: ADOPTION OF USER FEES AND SERVICES CHARGES
The City Council hereby approves and adopts, as its updated Master User Fee Schedule, the user fees and service charges for the following City departments and fee groups in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference: Finance and Administration; Animal Control; Community Services; Airport; Building; Planning; Utility Billing; Electric Utility; Police; Fire; and Engineering.
SECTION 5: METHODOLOGY FOR CALCULATION, ADJUSTMENT, AND
COLLECTION OF USER FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES
The user fees and service charges established in Exhibit A are hereby adopted, and shall be calculated, adjusted, and collected in accordance with City ordinances and the User Fee Study. The amount of the user fees and service charges may be adjusted annually for inflation on July 1st of each year by the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers ( CPI -U): Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario ( or any successor index). The calculation for that annual adjustment shall be made using the month of April over the month of April in the prior year.
SECTION 6: EFFECTIVE DATE OF NEW USER FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES The user fees and service charges established by Section 4 of this Resolution shall be effective on the sixtieth ( 60th) day following the adoption of this Resolution.
SECTION 7: REPEAL OF PRIOR USER FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES ADOPTED
BY CONFLICTING RESOLUTIONS
Any and all provisions of prior resolutions of the City Council establishing or modifying user fees and service charges in the categories established in the User Fee Study and set forth in Exhibit A, which duplicate or conflict with the provisions of this Resolution and Exhibit A, are hereby repealed and replaced with the fees and charges set forth in Exhibit A and the terms and conditions established by this Resolution upon the effective date of the new user fees and service charges as provided for in Section 6 of this Resolution.
SECTION 8: SEVERABILITY
If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Resolution or any part hereof is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 9: CERTIFICATION
The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause a certified copy to be filed in the book of original Resolutions.
4 58
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of December, 2019. di
Arthur L. Wel ,, Mayor
City of Banning
ATTEST:
Sonja De La Fuel Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL CONTENT:
Kevin Ennis City Attorney
Richards, Watson & Gershon
5 59
CERTIFICATION:
I, Sonja De La Fuente, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2019- 13 was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Banning held on the 10th day of December, 2019, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Andrade, Happe, and Wallace
NOES: None
ABSENT: Peterson and Welch
ABSTAIN: None
Sonja e a ue te, Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning, California
7 Resolution 2019- 113
60 EXHIBIT A
MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
Effective 60 Days After Adoption
Adopted on December 10, 2019, and Effective on February 8, 2019 61 Exhibit A to Resolution 2019- 13
Finance and Administration
Fees
6 Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Document Printing Fees - Black & White 0. 25 per copy 2 Document Printing Fees - Color 0. 35 per copy
3 Photocopying of Documents - Black & White 50. 25 per copy 4 Photocopying of Documents - Color 0. 35 per copy
5 Bound Document Fees
1 plus Applicable per
page charge
1. 00 for binding
materials
6 Photocopy Fees- Oversized ( maps) Actual Cost
7 Providing Agendas, Minutes, Packet, etc.
0. 25 plus postage if
mailed per page
Free if examined at
City HaII. Free for
Council, Affected
Commissioners, Dept.
Heads and Press. Free
for Council Candidates
two months prior to
election.
8 Document Certification 0. 25 per page
Copy of Budget - Other Than
0. 25 plus postage if
mailed
Regulatory Bodies,
etc.
10 Copy of Audit Report - Other
50. 25 plus postage if
mailed
Than Regulatory
Bodies, etc.
11 Return Check Processing 25. 00 1st/ 2nd Check 1st returned check 12 Cassette Tape of Meeting, etc. 9. 00 per cassette
13 DVD of any live broadcast 7. 00 per DVD
City of Banning
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee A
50. 25 NA 0. 25 0
50. 35 NA 0. 35 50
50. 25 NA 50. 25 0
50. 35 NA 0. 35 0
Variable NA
1 plus Applicable per page
charge
0 Variable NA Actual Cost NA
0. 25 NA 0. 25 plus postage if mailed 0
0. 25 NA 0. 25 0
50. 25 NA 0. 25 plus postage if mailed 50
50. 25 NA 50. 25 plus postage if mailed 0
NA NA
California Code, Civil Code -
CIV Sec. 1719
VALUE!
59. 00 NA 59. 00 0
57. 00 NA 57. 00 0
User fee Study Finance and Administration
62 Community Services Department
Municipal Pool
6 Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Admissions
la Open swim sessions Adults 2. 50 per person
lb Open swim sessions Children/ Seniors 51.0 per person 2 Lessons
2a Resident 40. 00 per person
2b Non - Resident 545. 00 per person
4 Private Rentals 5110. 0
per hour/ 2 hour
minimum
5 Cabana Rentals ( during open swim) 560. 00 Per Reservation 6 Junior Life Guard Classes 50. 00 per person
7 Water Exercise 53. 00 per class
8 Water Exercise - Punch Card - 10 Classes 525. 00 per card Activates _..
JI Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Youth Flag Football, Basketball & Soccer 30. 00 per session/ per child 2 Day Camp 550. 00 per child/ per week
3 Contract Class Fees 520. 00 - 550. 00 monthly Fees set by instructor 4 Contract Class Fees 53. 00- 55. 00 per class Fees set by instructor 5 Adult Sport Leagues - Softball 5300. 0 per team
6 Adult Sport Leagues • Basketball 5125. 00 per team
Community Center Renf21
8 Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Private Rates
la Gymnasium 120. 00 per rental
1b Large Mtg Room 60. 00 per rental
lc Small Mtg Room 560. 00 per rental
ld Kitchen & Gym 5300. 0 per rental
1 Non - Profit Rates
2a Gymnasium 500. 00 per rental
2b Large Mtg Room 530. 00 per rental
2c Small Mtg Room 530. 00 per rental
2d Kitchen & Gym 175. 00 per rental
Operation
Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
4. 70 36% 53. 00 70.);
52. 35 36% 1. 50 0%
dialillial
46. 97 4% 545. 00 13%
50. 00 0% 550. 00 11%
161. 80 0% 5161. 00 46%
5209.2 67% 569. 00 15%
NA NA 565. 00 3096
NA NA 53.0 1756
NA NA 530. 00 2036
Operation
Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
540. 05 0% 540. 00 33%
576. 90 22% 560. 00 20%
5107. 36 056 520. 00 - 550. 00
5107. 36 056 53. 00 - $5. 00
366. 93 556 5350. 0 17%
5291. 93 4% 5280. 0 174^,
Operation
Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
5201. 49 31% 5140. 0 17%
82. 03 1556 570. 00 17%
568. 79 13% 560. 00 0%
5329. 46
5201. 49
156
6556
5325. 00
70. 00
8%
17%
82. 03 57% 535. 00 1756
68. 79 49% 535. 00 17%
329. 46 39% 5200. 0 1456
City of Banning User Fee Study Community Services
63 Community Services Department
Senior Center Rental
Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Private Rates
la Nutrition Site 85. 00 per rental
lb MuIti- Purpose Room 585. 00 per rental
2 Non -Profit Rates
2a Nutrition Site 545. 00 per rental
2b Multi -Purpose Room 545. 00 per rental
Parks Facilities
Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Private Rates
la Park Picnic Shelter 25. 00 per rental
lb Ballfield 525. 00 per rental
lc Ballfield Lights - 2 hour minimum 515. 00 per hour
ld Dysart Park 5120. 0 per day
le Amphitheater & Stage 35. 00 per rental
if Laura May Stewart Building 585. 00 per rental
lg Roosevelt Park Building New per rental
lh Roosevelt Soccer Field New per rental
Staffing Fees
5 Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Monday - Thursday 8: 00am- 9: OOpm 512. n0 per hour
2 Monday - Thursday after 5pm, Fri, Sat, Sun and City Holidays 21. 00 per hour City of Banning User Fee Study
Operation
Cost Subsidy% Suggested Fee 0/-
5108.1 8% 5100. 0 18%
92. 03 2% 590. 00 6%
sari
5108.1 49% 555. 00 22%
582. 03 33% 555. 00 22%
Operation
Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
543.2 31% 30. 00 20%
533.2 1096 30. 00 20%
561. 61 72% 17. 00 13%
5145. 66 0% 5145. 00 21%
545. 01 0% 45. 00 2996
NA NA 590. 00 6%
NA NA 590. 00
NA NA 535. 00
Operation
Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
20. 00 0% 20. 00
27. 15 1% 527. 00 29%
Community Services
64 No changes, 5 year plan in place
Airport Fees
Fees
Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Resolution/ Ordinance 1 Fuel Sales Invoice + 25% Reso. 2015- 67
2 Tiedown Permanent 43. 75 per month Reso. 2015- 67
3 Tiedown Temporary 4. 00 per night Reso. 2015- 67
4 City Hangars - A/ B Row 311. 50 per month Reso. 2015- 67 5 City Hangars - A/ B Corner 382. 50 per month Reso. 2015- 67 6 City Hangars - C/ D Row 278. 75 per month Reso. 2015- 67 7 City Hangars - C/ D Corner 349. 75 per month Reso. 2015- 67 8 City Hangars - E Row 295.5 per month Reso. 2015- 67
9 City Hangars - E Corner 322. 50 per month Reso. 2015- 67 City Hangars - F- 1 164. 00 per month Reso. 2015- 67
11 Farrell/ Cooper Hangars - FC B- 1 thru
FC B- 8
175. 00 per month Reso. 2015- 67
12 Farrell/ Cooper Hangars - FC C- 1 thru
FC D -e
186. 00 per month Reso. 2015- 67
13 Farrell/ Cooper Hangars - FC 5- 1 thru
FC 5-6
49. 25 per month Reso. 2015- 67
14 Farrell/ Cooper Hangars - FC A & E 360. 75 per month Reso. 2015- 67 15 Beasley Hangar 295.5 per month Reso. 2015- 67
16 Access Fees 20. 00
per plane, per
month
Reso. 2015- 67
City of Banning User Fee Study
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee A
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
NA NA Per Reso 2015- 67 NA
Airport
65 Building Department Misc. Fee Schedule
Fees
p Description
Current
Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
Resolution/
Ordinance
1 Air handling/ heating or cooling unit replacement
544. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4 of CBC.
2 Additional plan review
176. 00 Hour
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4 of CBC.
3 Additional plan review- Engineering
176. 00 Hour
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
4 Awning/ canopy ( supported by building) New Each
Lnapcer J. ecuon
1 0 A . d car
5 Balcony/ deck
308. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4 of CBC.
6 Balcony/ deck railing repair
176. 00 Each Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4 of CBC.
7 Carport- custom 1. 8. 4
5176. 00 Each Chapter 1, Section
of CBC.
8 Carport- ICC, IAPMO, handout
220. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
Cell tower- modifications 308. 00 A`°'
u r"""'
iu
Cell tower- new
5308. 00 Each Chapter 1,, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
11 ChangeB of occupancy P y
5176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8.4 of CBC.
12 Certificate of Occupancy ( Enhanced)
New Each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
13 Demolition of building
132. 00
Each
Building
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
14 Electric panel replacement
New Each Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
15 Exterior wall covering replacement ( up to 400 s. f.) 5264. 00
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4 of CBC.
16 Fireplace- custom
5176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4 of CBC.
17 Fireplace- pre -fabricated with engineering
176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4 of CBC.
18 Flag pole ( over 20' in height)
132. 00
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4 of CBC.
19 Grease trap/ interceptor
522. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee C
5115.0 0% 115. 00 50
133. 00 0% 5133. 00 0
165. 00 0% 165. 00 50
163. 00 0% 163. 00 0
5305.0 0% 305. 00 50
190. 50 0% 5190. 0 50
5570. 0% 5570. 0 50
5305.0 0% 5305. 00 0
5265.0 0% 5265. 00 0
854. 50 0% 5854. 00 50
5251.0 0% 5251. 00 50
525. 00 0% 525. 00 50
5256. 00 0% 5256. 00 50
5115.0 0% 115. 00 50.0
5253. 00 0% 5253. 00 50
5353. 00 0% 5353. 00 50
5330. 0% 5330. 0 0. 50
5388. 00 0% 5388. 00 50
5198. 00 0% 5198. 00 50
City of Banning User Fee Study Building Depart Misc. Fee 66 Building Department Misc. Fee Schedule
Fees
p Description
Current
Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
Resolution/
Ordinance
20 Hood- other than Type 1 ( including ducts)
213. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4 of CBC.
21 Hood- Type 1 ( includes exhaust system)
44. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8.4 of CBC.
22 Inspection Fee- Hourly
588. 00 Hour
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8.4 of CBC.
23 Job card- replace/ duplicate
45. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8.4 of CBC.
24 Chapter
Lighting pole ( up to 6) 575. 00 6
1, Section
1. 8.4 of CBC.
25 Lighting pole (up to 6 additional) 544. 00 6
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8.4 of CBC.
26 Chapter
Manufactured home- installation on private property P p Y 5176. 00 Each
1, Section
1. 8.4 of CBC.
Modular unit- installation on private property
176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
Patio cover- custom
New Each Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
29 Patio cover- metal, ICC, IAPMO
176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
30 Patio cover- wood, ICC, IAPMO or handout
5176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1.8. 4 of CBC.
31 Patio enclosure 1. 8. 4
5440. 0 Each Chapter 1, Section
of CBC.
32 Plan check
176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8.4 of CBC.
33 Plan check- Structural Engineer 1. 8. 4
5176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
of CBC.
34 Pool/ spa- commercial
484. 00 each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
35 Pool/ spa- residential custom
484. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4 of CBC.
36 Pool/ spa- residential fiberglass/ vinyl - g / y lined 5308. 00 Each Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
37 Pool/ spa- residential gunnite
484. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1.8. 4 of CBC.
38 Re -Inspection
544. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8.4 of CBC.
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee A
5298. 00 0% 5298. 00 50
5380. 0% 380. 00 50.0
5110. 0 0% 5110. 0 50
560.0 0% 560. 00 50.0
463. 00 0% 463. 00 50
105. 00 0% 105. 00 50
5348. 00 0% 348. 00 0
5409. 00 0% 409. 00 50
323. 00 0% 5323. 00 0
5165.0 0% 5165. 00 50.0
323. 00 0% 5323. 00 0
5350. 0% 350. 00 50.0
125. 00 0% 125. 00 0
247. 50 0% 5247. 00 50.0
5714.0 0% 5714. 00 50.0
5521. 00 0% 521. 00 50
5355.0 0% 5375. 00 50.0
438. 00 0% 5438. 00 0
5121. 00 0% 5121. 00 50
City of Banning User Fee Study Building Depart Misc. Fee 67 Building Department Misc. Fee Schedule
Fees
k Description
Current
Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
Resolution/
Ordinance
39 Re -roof- commercial ( for each 3, 000 s. f.) 5264. 00 3, 000 s. f.
Chapter 1, Section
1.8. 4of CBC.
40 Chapter
Re - roof- multifamily ( for each 3, 000 s. f.) 5264. 00 3, 000 s. f. 1, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
41 Re - roof- SR) 5264 00
Each
Building
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
42 Research- hourly 1. 8. 4
5132. 00 Hourly
Chapter 1, Section
of CBC.
43 Residential bathroom remodel- no structural/ wall changes Valuation Each Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
44 Residential kitchen remodel- no structural/ wallchanges Valuation Each Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4 of CBC.
45 Retrofit foundation for a modular or mobil unit
176. 00 Each Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4 of CBC.
Sales office- conversion to residential or garage use
Valuation Each Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4 of CBC.
Septic tank 1. 8. 4
5176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
of CBC.
48 Sign- monument
5176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1.8. 4of CBC.
49 Sign- pole/ billboard 5440. 0 Each
Chapter 1
1.8. 4of C,
Section
BC.
50 Sign- wall 5220. 0 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
51 Site investigation
5176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
52 Solar- commercial ( each additional kw)
Valuation lkw Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4 of CBC.
53 Solar- commercial ( up to 4 kw)
Valuation 4 kw Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4 of CBC.
54 Solar- ground mount
Valuation Each Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
55 Chapter
Solar- residential rooftop ( more than 10 kw)
5318.0 Each
1, Section
1. 8.4 of CBC.
56 Solar- residential rooftop (up to 10 kw) 5318.0 10 kw Chapter 1, Section
1.8. 4of CBC.
57 Solar- residential water heater 1. 8. 4
588. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
of CBC.
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee 8
5198. 00 096 5198. 00 50
5198. 00 0% 5198. 00 50
5198. 00 096 5198. 00 50
591. 00 0% 591. 00 50
5248. 00 0% 248. 00 0
5273. 00 0% 273. 00 0
140. 50 0% 5140. 0 50.0
5140. 096 5140. 0 50.0
5223. 00 096 223. 00 50
5396. 00 096 5396. 00 0
5528.0 096 528. 00 50.0
5190. 0% 5190. 0 0. 50
5278. 00 0% 5278. 00 50
5122. 00 0% 122. 00 50
5243. 00 096 243. 00 50
5470. 096 5470. 0 50.0
5373. 00 096 5373. 00 50
5268. 00 096 268. 00 50
257. 50 096 5257. 00 50.0
City of Banning User Fee Study Building Depart Misc. Fee 68 Building Department Misc. Fee Schedule
Fees
p Description
Current
Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
Resolution/
Ordinance
58 Special Inspector application
New Each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8.4 of CBC.
59 Stairs- each flight 5176. 00 per flight
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4 of CBC.
60 Storage racks ( each 100 L. F.) 5176. 00 per 1001f.
Chpter 1,
1. 8. a4 of CBSection C.
61 Temporary P Y construction or sales trailer
88. 00 hr Each Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
62 Temporary electrical service
588. 00 Each Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
63 Temporary electrical service ( each additional pole) 58. 00 Each Chapter 1, Section
1.8. 4 of CBC.
64 Utility release
New Each Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4 of CBC.
Walk- in tub
176. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4 of CBC.
Wall- combo
Chapter
each 300 L. F.)
5924. 00 3001f.
1, Section
1. 8.4 of CBC.
67 Wall- freestanding ( each 300 L. F.) 5924. 00 300 If.
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8.4 of CBC.
68 Wall- pilaster 5308. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8.4 of CBC.
69 Wall- retaining- custom ( each 50 L. F.) 5528. 00 SO If. Chapter 1, Section
1.8. 4of CBC.
70 Wall- retaining- handout ( each 50 L. F.)
528. 00 SO If. Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
71 Chapter
Water heater replacement
515. 00 Each
1, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
72 Water as piping- installation, alteration or g P P g repair P
58. 00 Each
Chapter 1, Section
1. 8. 4of CBC.
73 Chapter
Window/ door replacement- residential, no changes to framing 5132. 00 Each
1, Section
1. 8.4 of CBC.
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee G
533. 00 0% 533. 00 50
5215.0 0% 215. 00 50
5154. 25 0% 154. 00 50
5148.0 0% 5148. 00 0. 50
5168. 00 0% 168. 00 1
5110. 0 0% 115. 00 513
5115.0 0% 115. 00 0. 50
5198, 00 0% 5198. 00 0
5308. 00 0% 5308. 00 0
5333. 00 0% 5333. 00 0
333. 00 0% 333. 00 50
538.0 0% 5538. 00 50
278. 00 0% 278. 00 0
5115.0 0% 5115. 00 50
5280. 0% 5280. 0 50
5248. 00 0% 248. 00 50
City of Banning User Fee Study Building Depart Misc. Fee 69 Budding New or Add SF The F. defaults to hit test. but can 9, manoals charmed 0, the column. The per 100 51. will automatically updalo BUILDING PERMIT FEES • Plan Check, Inspection and Permit Fees Combined U8C
Class UBC Occupancy
Square
Footage Old Conatntction Fee Schedule
Commernal• New 1, 001
5,01
10, 001
20, 001
50001
100. 01
1, 826. 00 plus
2. 835, 50 qua
3, 939. 00 plus
4, 6984, 00 plus
6, 945. 03 plus
11,00, 0 plus
25. 31 I. each additional 100 61. orltaceon thereof> M5° 1100 5. 1 50 and including 5, 0005. 1.
22. 02 for oath additional 10051. what/ on thereof> ha8ef 10004, 55 and including 10, 000 s. 1.
7. 45 for each additional 10054 or fraction thereof 0 hallo/ 100al, to and including 20, 00051
7. 54 for each additional 10051. orMction thoreol> hall of 10001., to and Including 50, 0003. 1. 8, 31 breach additional 100 s. f or fraction thereof> half of 100 s7., to and including 100. 000?.
11.0 for each additional 10051 or fraction thereof
Tenant Improvements 1
801
1. 251
2501
5, 001
12. 501
1,51. 00 plus 15. 77 for each additional 10051. or fraction thereof 0 half of 1005.-, 55 and Including 800 a. l. 1, 782. 00 plus 13. 78 for each additional 10054 or fraction thereof > hallo( 10001„ 50 and including 12000!. 2, 471. 00 plus 4, 55 for each additional 10001. or fraction thoreol > ballot 100 al, to and Including 25000!, 2, 926. 00 plus 4. 53 for cash additional 100 51 or fraction thereof > half of 10001, to and including 500051. 4, 375. 00 plus 5, 15 ter each additional 100 01 or fraction thereof > half of 10001, to and including 12. 50051,
6. 950, 0 plus 5. 90 for each addlbn, 110051. or fraction thereof Industrial - New 1. 001
5, 001
10, 001
20, 001
50, 001
100, 001
1. 56500 plus 22. 47 for each addition, 1100,. or fraction thereof > MB of 100., 55 and inducting 5. 000 51
2. 46400 plus 19. 36 Nr sash additional 100 a4 or fraction thereof > hag of 10051, to and including 10, 000 a1, 3, 432, 00 plus 6. 94 for each addsonal700. 1, orfraction thereof > hall of 10031, 10 andlndudag 20, 00001 4, 126, 00 plus 6. 20 Nr oath additional 1003. -or fraction thereof> ha0 e110011, to and indudn950. 0000J, 5, 985, 00 plus 7. 53 for each additional 10051 or fraction% woof> half of 10051, to and including 10013002J.
9. 750, 0 plus 9. 75 for each addliona110054 or fraction Nereid F-1 Woodworking 1. 001
5, 001
10, 501
20, 001
50, 001
100, 001
1. 095,0 pls 30, 74 for sash additional 10051. or fraction thereof> half of 100x1, N and including 5. 00031. 1, 710. 0 plus 26. 65 for oachadderonal 1000.. or fraction Maroel> half of100al, to and including 10, 000 s. 1 2, 376, 00 plus 6. 18 for each additional 1005E orBaotou thanol> ha84410091„ o and Including 20, 00054 2835. 00 plus 8, 93 for each474200ai 1005. or fraction therso10 half 341005., to and including 500000. 1 4, 175, 03 plus 10,6 for each addIionel 100 s1 or fraction thereof> half of 10051., Nand Including 100, 0001, 6, 715. 00 plus 13. 43 for each additional 100 al or fraction thereof Stool Produclror6Fa0rIcation 1, 001
5, 001
10. 001
20. 001
50, 001
100. 01
1, 930. 0 plus 13. 83 Nr each additional 10051, or 1racsn thereof > hag of 100 51., to and including 5, 00004
3. 036.0 plus 11, 92 for each additional 1000(. or fraction thereon half of 10031., to and including 10, 0005/. 4, 228. 00 plus 4. 24 for each additional 10051. or fraction thereof> half of 10031, 55 and Including 2000054
5. 078.0 plus 3. 54 for each additional 1000. 4or fraction thereof > hall of 10051, te and lnctudag 50, 0005. f 7, 080, plus 4. 62 ler each additional 0000/, or Notion thereof > half of 100 al., to andlndudkg 100. 00 61 12, 000. plus 6. 00 for each addhiono1100 51, or fraction thereof 144 Repair Garage 1, 001
5. 001
10, 001
20. 001
50. 001
100. 01
2. 023,0 plus 26, 62 for each addilwnal10051. or fraction thereof > Ml/ a111531., to andu0iseg 5. 0005!, 3, 168. 00 plea 24, 76 for nub add9bna110001. or fraction thereof> half o1100 51, to and including 1000051
4.06, 00 plus 6.6 for each a849anal 1005.. or fro 75e101> half 0 ol100, 1.. toand Including 20. 0005f5: 272. 00 pan 6. 16 for. 0eh 0440bna11005, 4or fraction thereof > half of 1005.„ to and Including 50, 000, 1.
7.20, 0 plus 9. 50 for each additional1001, 1 or fraction thereof> hallo( 10001, to and
12. 470, 0
including 1000000. f
plus 12. 47 for each addiponal 10051 or tractor, thereof 145 Aucrah Hangar 1, 001
5. 001
10. 001
20, 001
60, 001
100, 01
2, 196. 00 plea 29. 1, for each adddwnal 10051. or fracoon ' hereol> 90 x110054, to and including 5. 000 a. f. 3,66. 00 phis 25. 75 ler each additional 100 al or fraction thereof 0 half of MO 51., 50 andindudeg 00.005/
4. 653, 00 plus 8. 07 for each additional 100 s1. or fraction thereof> hall of 10051:, to as including 20. 0005. 1
5. 460, 0 plus 9, 50 for each . 440070110001. or fraction thereof > hallo? 10051„ Io and including 50. 000 s.0. 8, 310. 0 plus 9, 36 for each additional 100 el or fraction thereof > half of 100 51, to and indudn9100, 0001. 12, 990. 0 plus 12, 99 for each add9unal 1005/. or fraction thereof
1. Nursery - Pull time 15. 1, 001
5, 001
10. 001
20, 001
50, 001
100. 01
1.51. 00 plus 15. 77 far each additional 1005, or fraction thereof > hag of 10( 3.5, to and Including 5, 000 5.1.
1. 78200 plus 13, 78 for each 0449i,1100 cf. or( radon thereof > half afl00 al, to wort including 10, 00051- 2, 471. 00 plus 4. 55 for each additional 100s. lor fraction Buren, >half of 10051., to and including 20. 00051. 2, 926. 00 plus 4. 63 for each add00n411000. 1 or fraction thereof > he8 of 10054, le and including 50, 000, 1. 4, 375. 00 plus 5, 15 for each 448069al 10051 or fraction th. aol> half of 100 01, to anaixmding 100. 00 3.1.
6. 950, 0 plus 8. 95 for each additional 10051 or fraction thereof i- .2 Health Cam canters 1, 001
5, 001
10. 001
20. 001
50. 001
100. 01
2, 380. 0 plus
3, 898. 00 plus
5. 139, 00 plus
6. 150, 0 plus
9, 010, plus
14. 550, 0 plus
33.8 1or each addd8nal100 54 or fraction thereof> half of 100 51.. to and including 5. 00061,
28. 87 for each additional 10051- or fraction thereof > halter 10064, to and including 10. 00051.
10.1 for each additional 10031. orfraction thereol> half of 1005.. to andincludno 20, 00051
9. 53 for each additional 1005. 4 er fraction thereof> half of 100., to as including 50, 000 51.
11. 08 for each additional 1006?. or fraction thereon half of 100 51., to and including 100. 00061 1455 for each additional 10031 or fraction thereof
12 Nursing Horne/ Assisted Living? 1, 001
5. 001
10. 001
20. 001
50, 001
100, 51
2, 364. 00 plus 33. 43 f. Oath additional 10) 01 or fraction theraof > halfof 10051, 5 and include, 5. 000 0. 1.
3. 102, 00 plus 28. 93 f. Wien additional 100 51 or fraction thereol> half of 10051, to and including 10. 0005!.
5. 148, 00 plus 10. 08 for each add' nbna1100 s!. arachon thereof> hag of 1005!., to and including 20, 00051
6. 156, 00 plus 9. 56 foroath additional 10051 or fraction thereof > half of 10051. 5 and Including 50. 00051.
9. 025, plus 11. 09 for each additional 10051 or fraction thereof* half of 10051, to and Including 00.0051, 14, 570. 0 pis 14. 57 for each additional 10011. or rachen thereof New Con3tmc0, n Fee Schedule . 100% Cost Recovery
52. 925, 38 plus 26. 92 for each additional 10081. or fraction thereof > hal of 100 5.1., to and nclu1mg 500053. 4, 002,0 pus 30. 59 for each 0440600010031 or fraction thereof > half of 100 0,1., 9, and Including 10, 0003. f
5.48. 25 plus 20, 99 ler each addi4ane1100a1arbastion thereof> hag of 10001. to and including 20, 00051 7, 045. 13 plus 9, 10 for each additional 100... or fraction Unroof > half of 1005,, to and including 50, 00051. 10, 374. 75 plus 626 for each446507, 110s- lerfraction tweet >half of 16001, ha and including 100. 00 al
13. 506, 75 plus 837 for each additional 10051. or fraction thereof
51. 89225 plus 47, 58 for oath additional 1003. l, or fraction thereof > hat of 10051„ to and including 6005, E 2,72, 88 plus 89. 42 for Oath additional 100 slot hachantherool> hal of 10051„ to and nchWlng 1250 s,1.
2. 675, 2 phis 54. 81 for each additional 10051. 3rfraction thanof> ha8 of 10051„ to and including 2500 s1,
3.60.8 plus 26. 97 for each additional 1003., ar fraction thereof> hat/ o1100 s!., l and nchding 500051, 4, 034, 63 plus 9, 43 for each additional 103 or fraction thereof > hal of 1005l,. 10 and including 12, 50061,
4. 741, 50 plus 12. 72 for each add8onal 10051. or fraction thereof 52, 631. 75 plus 17. 67 for each 444801al 10005!. or fr001908wre010 hall of 10001-, to and irobding 5, 000. 1 3:38. 83 plus 20. 01 for each 08860nal 10034 or fraction thereof> half of 10014. to and including 101300 51 4, 339. 13 plus 13. 05 for each 0444. na110031. or ftac8on thereof a hall 011008. 1„ to and Including 20, 000 51.
5. 644, 13 plus 4. 28 for each additional 10091., 1900605thereof 8 half 0100051., to and including 50, 000 , 1. 6, 927. 38 pis 4. 26 for each additional 10051. or faction thereof> hall of 10051„ to and 9, 058. 8 plus 5,2 far each additional 1000f. or fraction thereof Including 100. 00,. l
90. 00 plus
plus
pus
plus
plus
plus
for each 84460na11005. 1or fraction thereof> half of 10081-, to and including 5. 000 51. for each additional 1005!. or fraction 80. 18010 hag of 10051., to and Including 10, 000 5J. for each additional 100510r fraction hereof > half of 1005. 5. 10and including 20, 050 0/. for each additional 100 0, f. or faction thereof 0 half of 100 31., to and including 50. 000 51 for each additional 100 04 or goon thereof> hag x110031, lo and including 100, 00001, for each additional 100 al. or fraction thereof
50. 00 plus
plus
plus
plus
Plus
for oath addnonal 100 al. or fraction thereof 0 nag of 10031, loand Incbdin9 5, 000 04 for each additional 100 04 or haction th. mot> half of 10352, to and including 10, 000 51, tar each additional 1000!, or fraction thereol0 half 0110002. 10and inducing 20. 00031. for each additional 10054 or fraction thereof w hag of 100 s1„ to and including 5000054. for each additional 100 slow fraction thereof, half of 100 sl„ to and ncluding 100, 00 01. or each additional 100,, or fraction thereof
30, 00 plus
Pis
pls
Fis
pus
plus
for each. 44, 0on, l1001.. or fraction thereof > half 01100. 1., to and 84o4,95, 00001. for each add60nal 100. or fraction thereol8 half of 100 01,. 10' 494 Including 10. 00051, fur oath additional 100 sl. or fraction thereof> half of 10051, to and including 20, 000 01, for each additional 100 51. wfraction thereof> half of 1003. I,, 00094 including 50. 000 V. for each 3489onal 100 star fraction thereof, hay 81100 04. 10 and including 100. 00031. for each addeona1100 51. or hasten thereof
90. 00 plus
plus
pls
plus
pis
for each. 4068, al 100 31 or iracaan thareol> half of 100 sl.. to and including 5. 00051. far each addMenal 100 54 or fraction thereof > half of 10001, and Including 10, 00004 for each addi60ns1100 01. or fraction thereof > half of 10011, to and including 200001. 1:
for each addilbnaf 10001 or fraction th. nol0 hag of 1005, to and Including 50, 00054 for each additional 100 s4 or fraction thereof > MB, 1100,., to and including 100, 00 cr. for each ad40. 1,? 00001. or fraction thereof
00.0 plus
Plus
plus
Plus
Plus
plus
for each oddieoml 000 5, or fraction thereof > hal of 100 5f„ to and eciudng 5, 000 51.
Nr each additional 100 V. or fraction thereof a hal of 100 sl., to and including 10, 000 31 for each . 189.5? 100 s/, er fraction thereof> half o1100 51, 03 and including 20, 000 a1, for each additional 1000. or fraction thereof > half of 100 01, to and including 50, 000 s., for each ad8Nonal 10001 or Inchon thereof > half of 100 51., to and Inckding 100. 00001 for each 048, 6. 011000. 1, or fraction thereof
50. 00 plus
plus
plus
plus
du,
plus
preach add8onal 100. 5or fraclbn thereof> half of 100 01.. 10 and including 5, 000 sf.
Nr each additional 100 01, or faction thereof 0 hell of 100 0.4, to and including 10000 51 Nr each additional 1000. offractIon thereof 0 half of 100 51„ to and Including 20, 000 5., for each additional 100 31. orhad6n thereof> half el 100 s.4, to and including 50, 000 51. for each additional 100 01. or 1, 081, 1them./ 0 halal 100,,?,, to and including 100, 00 01. for each additional 100 3.1. or Iranian thereof
50. 00 plus
plus
Plus
plus
plus
plus
far each additional 100 01. or traction thereof > hall of 100 s. f„ to and Including 5, 000 sf. for each additional 10031 or fraction thereon hell of 100 5.1.0 and including 10, 0005. 1- Nr each additional 100 04 or fraction ' hare*? > half of 100 51, to and including 20, 000 s. f, for each additional 1001.. or fraction thereof > half of 100 04, to and including 50, 000 51 for each additional 1001.. pr fraction thereof > half of 1005(, to and including 100. 00 s4 for each additional 10014, or fraction thereof
Ow of Banning User Fee Study 9uI0,3 kit
70 BUILDING PERMIT FEES - Plan Check. Inspection and Permit Fees Combined UBC
Class UBC Occupancy
square
Footage Old Construction Fee Schedule
4 Depanmont Stores 1. 01
10, 001
20. 001
50001
100, 01
1. 74010 plus
2. 747, 00 plus
3, 828. 00 dm
4, 612. 00 plus
8. 660. 9 pus
10, 890, 99 pus
26, 17 for each a0d0ion01100.,?. or fraction thereof 4hag of 110 s, 1-, to and including 5, 00031.
21. 63 for each additional 100 al, or fraction thoreof, he of10081.. to and including 10, 000 s1.
7. 54 for each add6bnal 1008, lorfraction thereof half of 10001. loand Including 20, 00001
6. 83 for each additional 100 a. or fraction thereol, hag 01003. to and inducting 50. 000 a,
8. 48 for such additional 1008, orlre09100t reo( 4 hag of100a4, to and including 100, 000,, 1 10, 59 for each additional 100 31. or fraction thereof
Id Stores lRetodl 1, 001
5, 001
10, 001
20. 001
50, 001
100001
1, 67100 pus
2, 649. 00 pus
3. 696, 00 pus
4,68. 00 plus
6, 405. 00 pus
10, 530. 0 plus
24. 45 ! preach add0ional100, 4 orfraction thereal, half of 10031. to and including 5, 0000. 1. 2094 for each additional 10031. or fraction lhereol, half of10001„ b and including 10, 00001.
7.2 for each additional 10081, or traction thereol, hall05100 0/., to and Including 20, 00031,
6. 46 foreach . 4817,4! 100, 4. or fraction lhereol, half of 10001.. to and including 50, 00031. 6, 25 for each additional 100 s.1, or traction thereof half of 100 0. 5., to and including 100. 00081.
10. 53 for , ach additional 100x1. or fractionlhared
0 Retail Tennant Improvements 1, 001
5, 001
10, 001
20, 001
50. 001
100. 01
861. 00 pus
1, 32010. plus
1. 926, 00 pus
2, 14510 pas
3357. 90 pus
5, 104, 00 plus
57. 40 for each additional 10031 orlraction thereon had of 100 s1., to and Including 5, 00001 50,7 for sash additional 10081. or traction theraol> hag 9710001, b and including 1000031.
15. 98 for each additional 100 al. or fraction thereon 538911000. 1, b and including 20, 00031.
18. 53 for each additional 100 8 . of Iracdon thereof > half ' 100 0. 1., to and Including 501003J.
18. 47 for sash additional 10531 or fraction thereof, half of1000, 1•, to and Including 100. 030 11.
25. 52 for each additional 100 57, or lradontherool
R. 1 Hotels 8 Motels ( repeat) 1, 001
5. 001
10001
20, 001
50001
100. 01
2, 158, 00 plus
3. 409, 00 plus
4, 752, 00 plus
5, 72810 plus
8. 26510 pus
13, 520W pas
31. 29 for each addition! 10031 or ffasien thereol, half of 100 slab and Including 5, 000 31,
26. 86 for each additional 10031 oractbn thereol, 808 of 10031, to and Including 10. 0000. 1
9. 76 for each additional 10031 or (radon thereon MP o110001, to and including 20. 0001. 1, 8, 46 for each additional 10001, or hasten thereof half of10031, to and including 50. 00031
10. 51 for each additional 100 01 of fraction thereon ha8 of 1000... la and including 100, 00 5.1 13, 52 for each additional 100 01 or fraction thereof
0.1 Apartment 6516 ( repeat) 1. 001
5, 001
10. 001
20. 001
50, 001
100, 01
2. 158, 03 plus
3. 10818 flu,
4. 752. 00 pus
5, 728. 00 pus
0, 26510 plus
13. 520, 0 pus
31, 29 for each additional 100 51. or fraction thereon half of 1000110 ark including 5, 000 31. 26, 06 for each ad4ition01100 s, l, of fraction thereon ha8 of I00 8f„ to end locludng 10. 000 s1
9. 76 for each. 40itional 100 3. 1. orlacion thereon hall of 10031, to and Including 20. 00001.
8. 46 for each additional 10031 or traction thereof> hal of 100 a. to and including 50. 0031
10. 51 lot 0,5 additional 100 31. o, fraction thereof, ha80l 10001, to and including 100, 00 31
13. 52 for each additional 100,. 7 or fraction thereof
Rem4enW3 Now (single or
multi family- qr Anling wit)
601
1. 201
2, 001
3, 001
4, 001
6. 001
10, 001
pus na. for each additional 1006. or fradon thereof half of 10081„ to and including 800 a1. pus ma. for each additional 100 s. f or fraction thereof half e110001,, toark including 120031. pus ma. forrich additional 100t1. or 1006, nthereof 508,10001„ to and including 200001. pkn ma. for each additional 10031 or fraction thereof, half of 10001.. to and including 300081. plus n.a. for each addition, 1100sl. or fraction thereof> half' 10031., to and Including 4000 s1 plus n.a. for each additional 1000f. 00 fraction thereof, half of 10031, to and including 6000 01 n.a. pus n.a. for each additional 1005.?, or fraction thereof 07084? 100 al„ to and including 10033 a 1. n. a. qua n. a, for each ad6iliona11008l. orhaefon thereof Reskanoal- Production Pnase
501
2. 001
3, 001
3, 001
4, 001
6. 001
10. 001
n. a. plus ma. for sash a4d4iona) 10081. orlra0aon thsroof 0110o0100a, to andndu0ng 80081. pea na. for each additional 10031 or fraction thereol, half of 103 to and including 1200' 81. na. plus , for sash additional 100 31 or fractionihoreof> half el 100 3. 1., b nerd including 2000 sl. n.a. lor. 007 additional 1000. f or fraction ' Woof 0 half o1100a1, es and includn93000 s1, plus ma, for each odditnnal100 al, Parse00n thoreol> halo/ 100 a. l., to and indudng 400051 plus n.a. foreach add500411005, 1. or fraction Mono? a. half of 100, 4., to and nclu481600031. plus n. a. for each30050031100 sl. or fraction thereof MN of 10001., to and including 10000 a1. n. a, pas n,a. for each additiena11W 31, or fraction thereof
8. 2. 1 Group Cara Non- Amb) 60) 250
1250
2. 500
5000
12, 500
25. 000
1.09, 00 pus
1, 676. 00 plus
2, 310. 0 plus
2. 67910 pus
4, 17000 pus
6. 403. 00 plus
56. 76 fo0 each additional 100 al orlraction thereof, ha8 el 10031, to and including 735081. 50, 69 for each additional', 00s, I or fraction thereof, half 4? 10001., to and including 2, 500 01
14. 77 for each additional 10031 or ' radon thereof, half of 10001, to and including 5. 00001,
19. 88 for each 061,. 100 01. or fraction thereon half el 100 81., to and Including 12, 500 a1
17. 86 for each 04dition3I 100 01 or fraction thereol, hag of 100 01., to and Including 25, 00 a,1
25. 61 for each addiliono1700 51. or fraction them?
9. 218 Group Care. Ambulatory 1657 250
1, 250
2500
5. 000
12. 500
25, 00
1214, 00 pus
1, 961. 00 plus
2, 574, 0 pus
3. 023, pus
4. 594, 00 pus
7. 193. 00 plus
84.0 for each 344) 00al 10031. or fraction thereof > ha80l 10031„ to and including 125001. 57, 02 for each additional 100, 4. or fbc9on thereon Lag of 100 3. 1. to and Including 2, 500 , 1.
17. 95 for each 340it0na1100 M. or Reston them,. 0 half' 100 al.. to and Including 5, 00031.
20. 65 for cosh additional 1000,. or fraction thereof, hell of 10081,0and including 12. 500 0.1.
20. 79 for each additbna11000. or fraction thoreof, half' 1005l.. lo and indudng 25. 000 cf. 28, 77 for each addition' 1000.. or Inaction Ih0reof
Gw' Bantams User Fee Studs
New Construction Fee Schedule • 100% Con Recovery
80, 00 plus for each additional 100 af. of fraction thereof 0 hag of 10001, to and including 5, 000 al, pW for each , ddi5onal100sl, or fraction there" hag of 100 a, to and including 1010031 plus for each additional 10081. or fraction ? hereof0 5.0,10031., to and including 20, 00031 plus for each additione1100 81 or fraction thereof 0 hag of 100 81,. to and Including 50. 000 81, PL. for each addi6ene110031. or fraction thereof , halo( 10031„ to and including 100, 00af.
Plus for eacha400onal loo al, orfraction thereof
1000 plus
plus
plus
pu,
pea
pus
for oath addi0en0! 100 a1, or fraction thereof, hall o1100 0f., to and including 5, 000 al, for exh additional 100 s, f, or fraction thereof 0 had 100 51„ to and 011641ng 10, 000 al, lot each addition$ 100 01, or fraction thereof ha8 of 100 af., to and including 20, 000 al. for each additional 100 31. or fraction thoreol> ha8 of 100 51„ to and including 5010054. for each additional 100 ad. or fraction thereon half of 100 31., to and including 100, 000. 5. for each additional 100 a, l, or fraction thereof
80. 00 plus
plus
pus
pus
pus
qua
for exh additional 10001 or fraction thereof 0 ha of 100 0/„ to end MBkirg 5, 003 31 for each additional 100 01. or fraction thereof, half of 100 al.. to and Including 10, 000 08. for each oddi0ona1100 a1 or fraction thereof , ha8 of 100 al„ to and including 20, 000 s. l. for sash additional 16031 or fraction thoreof > half of 10031, to and Including 50. 000 sl. for each additional 100 s, l, or fraction thereof 0 half of 100 al„ to and including 100. 00001. for each additional 100 11. or fraction ? hereof
80. 00 plus
pus
pus
pus
pus
pus
for each 404, 5onal 1000, or fraction thereof half of 10001, to and including 5, 000 8!, for each additional 100 0. f. or fraction thereol, hog of 100 01., to and Including 15000 01 for sash additional 100 31 or /radian thereof, half of 100 51, to and including 20, 000 31. for each additional 100 5,. or fraction thoreof > ha of 10001, to and Including 50, 00031 for each additional 10031. or fraction thereof, half of 100 31. to and Including 100. 00 0.5. for each addnona) 100 31. or fraction thereof
50. 00 qua
plus
pus
pus
plus
pea
for 9405300, 90nu1100 31. of fraction thereon half of 100 31., to and including 5, 000 s. f. for each addition/ 110001. or fraction thereol, hall of 100 31, to and including 10, 000 3f. for each 044i8on4110031, or fraction thereof half of 100 0.1 to and i cludin920. 00031
for each W40, 02110001. Of fraction thereon half or 100 31, to and Including 50, 00001 for 03, 6 additional 10001. or fraction thereof hag of 100 8f., to and Including 100, 00 31 for each addtona1100 31, or fraction Loreto,
82, 512. 13 plus 24. 47 for each additional 10031 or fraction thereof 0ha8 of 1CO tct and including 80001, 2, 707, 88 pus 67. 97 for each addional100a1. 0rfradiantherson half of 10031, to and nclu4ing 120031
2. 979. 75 pus 43. 50 for each additional 10051. or fraction thereof, half of 10011, to and including 200031. 3,27, 75 plus 44, 59 for each additional 10031, ot fraction thero, f 0 half of 10031, to and including 300031 3, 770. 63 pus 63. 08 for each add4ona1100al. or fraction thereof 0 half 0100084, 7 and including 400931.
4.04, 38 qua 41. 33 foreach add9ona11003i. of fraction thereol, half of 100 a. to and Including 6000.. 1 5, 230, 86 plus 23. 11 for each additional 100al. Or fraction thereof, he, of 100sl., to and including 10000. 1. 6, 755. 2 plus 31. 19 for each additional 100 a1. or fraction thereof 82, 211. 99 pus 28, 00 for each, 2490nal I00 a./. orfraction thew!, half of I00a1. b and including 80031.
2. 436, 00 plus 7. 61 for each add0unol 1000.5, fraction thereof 0 half of 103 01., to andncludiny 12000.. 2, 466.5 plus 60, 36 for each a4d9onal 100., or fraction therwf > half of 10051.. to and including 200081. 2, 949, 30 plus 27. 19 for each additional 10031. or fraction thereof, half of 10091,0 and including 300031. 3, 221. 18 plus 53. 72 for each additional 100 01 or fraction 000100f> half Of 100a1, loand including 400031. 3, 758. 10 plus 39, 26 for each additional 10031. or fraction thereon h08 of 10011, to andincuding 600031,
4. 543.9 plus 19. 25 for each additional 10001. of fraction 0000.046, 00l 10081„ toand 06&, 41ng 1000081.
5. 313, 5 plus 117 for each additional 100 al, or fraction thereof
50. 00 glue
plus
p800
plus
pus
pus
for each a4dn0na1100 Si. of Inchon thereof 0 5011 of 100 a1, to and ncading 5, 000 31. for each additional 10031. or fraction there', half of 100 s, l„to and including 10, 000 sl, for each addi9onal 100 s1, or fraction thereof > half of 100 31, to and ncludin020, 00 sl, tor each additional 1000.. or traction there', half of 100 8, f., to and including 50. 000 31, for each eddi9on01100 s. f. or fraction ' haled 0 half of 100 3f.. to and including 100, 00 s1, lot sash additional 100 31. or fraction thereof
2000 plus
plus
plus
pas
plus
Plus
for each 1ddibon ? 100 31 or facbon Mateo? > hat of 100 31„ to and o 4uthng 5, 000 al, for sash 344, 9ana110001. or ?radian thereof half at 100 01. 10 and including 10, 000 31 for each addi0ona1700 al, or fraction thereof, half of 100 0. f-, to and including 20, 000 01. for each additinb1100 s. l. or fraction thereof > hall 011000110 and including 50, 000 s. f. for each additional 100 al. or fraction thereof > hall of 100 0,, to and including 100, 00 s.1 for each ad0i00rul 100 01 or fraction Moreol
Building Fees
71 BUILDING PERMIT FEES - Plan Check, Inspection and Permit Fees Combined UBC
Class USG 0ccu Occupancy v
Square 4+
Footage Old Construction Fee Schedule New Construction Fee Schedule • 1980 Cost Recovery 4-2,1, Group Caw, Non• Amb. 114/ 300
1, 500
3. 000
6, 000
15000
30. 000
1. 33800 plus 5901 for each 300itona110031 or Buchan thereof a nap 011006, 1., to and including 1, 00031
2. 046.0 plus 5214 for each additional 100 s.(. or fraction thereof a half of 10031. to and lndudng 300031 2, 526. 00 pus 18. 24 for each odditiona? 100 al. or fraction thereof, hag of 100 s, t, to and including 6. 000 31,
3.15. 00 pus 19, 35 forsackad0bnal 100 s. f. or fraction thereof hallo? 100 31., to and 5, 057.0 plus 18. 91 for each additional 1000,?. or fraction thereof liar of 100 s. f., to and including 15, 000..
including 30. 0009. 1.
7. 893. 00 plus 26. 31 for each additional 10031, or fraction thereof R• 2.1 6 Group Cato. Ambulatory ( 14) 300
1. 500
3, 000
6. 000
10000
30000
8, 33600 pus 5901 for each soagonal 100, 0 or fraction thereof half 9? 100 s, l., to and 2046, 00
including 15009. 0
pus 52. 14 for ouch additional 1003.?. or fraction 106130? a half of 1006,, to andindud6g 3. 00061, 2, 826. 00 phis 16. 24 for each additional 1003?. or fraction IMreel> half of 10031„ to and Including 6, 0006. 1 3,15. 00 plus 19. 35 for each additional 100.?. or fraction thereof a half »? 1003, f„to and Including 13, 000 61
5. 057.0
7, 893. 00
plus 18. 91 for ouch additional 10031 or faction thereof hag of10031, toand including 30. 0006. fplus 26, 31 for each additional 100 s1 or? racoon thereof
5. 1 M. Storago 1000
5, 000
10, 000
20. 000
50000
100000
1253. 00 pus 16, 34 for each a0d0ona110031 or fraction Mineola hatred 1003.. to and Including 5. 000 s. f.
1. 957, 00 plus 15, 70 tier each additional 10031, or fraction thereof aha6 of 100 s,8,, to and including 10. 0003, 1
2. 77200 pin 550 for oath additional 100 s. l.or fraction thereof a ballot 10031.; k and including 20. 00031 535200 plus 4, 86 for each additional 10031, or fraction thereof a hag of 100 31, to and including 50, 0006. 1. 4, 810. 0 pus 6. 20 lot sash additional 100 sl. or fraction torso' 0 half 01100. 1„ to and indudna 100, 00 sr. 7, 910. 0 pus 7, 91 for each additional 100 sl. sr fraction thereof 6• I Moderate Hazard Storage 1, 000
5 000
10, 000
20. 000
50, 300
100, 00
1, 494, 00 pus 20. 84 for each additional 10031 or fraction ' home half o110031., to and Inducting 5. 0006. f2. 328, 00 plus 1512 for each additional 10031 or fraction thereof a half al 100 3. 1., to and include' 10. 000 61 3, 234. 00 pus 6. 18 for each additional 10031 or fraction thereof a hags' 100 31., to and including 20, 000 3. 1. 3, 852. 00 plus 6. 14 tor each additional 100,. or fraction thereof hallo( 1001,, la and including 50. 00031
5. 69510 plus 6. 85 for each additional 10061. or fraction ? hereol> hog of 1003.?., k and Including 100, 00 s. f. 9, 120. 0 pus 9, 12 Ioreach additional 10031- or fraction tholes?
5. 2 Low Hazard Storage 1, 000
5, 000
10, 000
20. 000
50000
100. 00
1. 947, 00 plus 27. 31 for each adelona110011. 0, 580eon thereof a nag of 10031, to and lndudmg 5. 00061. 3, 03900 plus 23. 70 for each additional 10031, orirac80n thereof a half of 10031, to andindudng 10, 00031. 4, 224, 00 plus 8. 16 for each additional 10031 sr ?radon thereof half of 1003., to and including 2000031 5040. 0 plus 7. 93 for each additional 100 s1. or ?radon thereof half of 10031, to and including 50, 000 3(. 11, 940. 0
7, 420. 0 plus
plus 11. 94
9. 04 for
for
each
each additonal
additional
10031.
10031. or
or
traction
traction
thereof
thereof
ahog of 100 s. f., to andt0uding 100, 003, 1
an 200
1. 000
2, 000
4, 000
10000
20. 000
1314, 00 plus 80.6 for each addition? 1003. sr Patton thereof a hag of 100 s,h,? 0 and including 0000, 1, 1, 86100 plus 7127 for ouch additional MOsA, or fwc9onlhereof a hag 0100 3.0 Is and Including 2. 00061 2, 574. 00 pus 22. 43 for ouch additional 10031. or fraction thereof a half of 10031, to and including 4. 000x1. 3, 022.0 pus 26. 15 for each additional 10031- or fraction tharaola Mko? 10031-, 18and including 1000031 4, 593. 00 plus 26. 01 for each additional 1006.. or nacho, thereof ahall of 100 cf., to and including 20. 00031. 7, 194. 00 plus 35. 97 Ior each additional 100 s. f. or fraction thereof Residential- Addition ( single or
multi family) 1
301
501
801
1, 501
2001
1, 320. 0 pus 90. 73 for each additional 100 sl, or fraction thereof a hag of 1003,, to and including 300 3.1.
2. 046,0 plus 7921 for each additional 1009!. or fraction thereon 6860110031., to and including 500 31. 2, 83100 pus 26. 39 for each 004,0, a1100& J, 0rlracoon thereof a hallo( 1003.., to and ndu050000s(. 3,6600 pus 2751 for each additional 10051. or fraction thereof, half of 100 al., to and indudag 150031,
0.1600 pus 29. 70 for each additional 1003. or fraction thereof shallot 10061., to and including 2. 0003.*
7. 98600 plus 39. 93 for each Macau? 10031, or fraction thereof Residential. Remodel ( angle at
multi family) 1
301
501
001
1, 501
2, 001
1,09. 00 plus 70. 95 for each additional 100,. or fraction thereof 1 hl of 1001.„ to and Including 3003, 1, 67600 pus 63. 35 for each additional 10031. et fraction teeeol a half WOO to and Including 5003. f 2, 310. 0 plus 18. 47 for each additional 10061, 0? fraction thereon half of 10051„ to andlndudng80061. 2, 67900 pus 24. 85 for each additional 10031 or fraction thereof, half of 10091., to and Including 1500 s. f.
4. 170. 0 pus 22, 32 for each additional 10031 or fraction thereof a 50641100 s.1„ to and including 2, 000 9.?.
6. 402. 00 plus 32, 01 far each additional 100 s. f. or fraction theme? Snell Buildings 1
1001
5, 001
10, 001
20001
50, 001
806. 00 plus 112? for each additional 1003?. or fraction thereol> half of 100 s.1, to and inducting 1, 000 13. 125500 plus 9. 75 Br ouch additional 10011 of fraction thereof, M8e1100 s,1, to and including 5. 000, 1.
1. 742, 00 pus 3.2 for each additional 10031, or faction thereof a half of 10031,?, and including 10. 00031.
2. 074.0 pus 3.0 for each additional 10031: or fraction thereol, hag of 100.?.. to and including 20. 0003,?, 3, 065.0 plus 3, 71 la each additional 100 s. l. or Pastan disrupt a hag of 100al„ to and Including 50, 000 5.1
4. 920. 0 pus 4. 92 for each additional 10031. or fraction thereof Gam., Sloragol Workshop 1
401
001
1, 001
1, 501
20. 001
pus nua. for each additional 10031. srfrectan thereat M6s/ 100 3.1., to and including 4003. 1. pus ne. for each additional 100 ,, 1 sr fraction thereof a hog of 10030, to and Including 60031 plus n.a. for each addition 100 cf. orPatton thereon half of 10031.. to and including 1000 cf. pus n. a. Ior each additional 10011, a fraction thereof a half of 1003. t,o and inducing 1. 5000. 1, pus n. a. for each additional 1003,. or traction Memo( a half or 10031.. to and Including 20. 00031 n.8. plus n, a. for each additional 10031 or fraction thereof
80. 00 plus for each030,? onal 10031- or traction thereof a half of 100 s1., to and including 5, 000 s.?. plus for each additional 10001. of traction thereof a half of 100 s1., to and including 10. 000 91 plus for each additional 10091 or fraction thereof a half of 10031. and including 20, 0009. 1 plus for each additional 1003.. or traction thereof0 hag 0110030, to and Including 50, 00051, plus for ouch salaam.? 10031 or fraction thereof a hall 0110031. 1and including 100. 00031 plus for each add0ono11009. 3ar fraction thereof
50. 00 pas
plus
plus
plus
plus
plus
for anal admnona1100 s. l. or traction 8313060 hog of 100 3.1„ to and hchlding 5000 3, 1 for each 40050, al 100 slot fraction thereof a hag of 100 3f„ to and including 10, 000 31. for 005 4000ono? 100 O. or fraction thereof, half of 100 3f., to and Including 20, 003 11. for each additional 100 31 or traction Mayo? agog of 100 s. f., to and including 50. 03031. for ouch additional 100 3. 1. or fraction thereof » half 01100 3f„ to and Including 100000 s. l. for each additional 100,. or fraction thereof
80. 00 pus for each additional 10091. 0r fraction thereof a half of 100 31, to and including 5, 000 31, plus ler each additional 100 slot fraction thereof a half of 10031,0 and including 10, 000 31. pus fat ezch additional 100 31 or fraction thereof a half of 100 31,. to and Including 20. 000 .. 1. plus • for ouch additional 100 slot fraction Inureof> hag of 10031, to and including 20. 000 3. 1. pus PREF! for each additional 100 s. f, or fraction thereola hag of 10031-, to and including 50, 0003(. plus . REF, for each additional 100 slew fraction Memo? 80, 00 pus - for each additional ? 00 cf. 01* action Meteor a hall of 10031„ to and Including 500031 pen • broach additional 100 al. sr fraction thereof a half of 1001..0 and Including 10. 00031 plus • for each additional 100 s. l, or fraction thereof, hag of 10031„ toark including 20, 0005/, plus • for each additional 100 s/. ortraction thereof a halt of 100 cf., to and including 20, 00031 plus FREF! Icr each additional 100, 1. or faction thereof a half of l00 al., to and Including 50. 00031. plus NIGER for each additional 10030 or fraction thereof 80, 00 pus - Brandt addlhenal1003/. or fraction iMreola hal of 10031, to and Including 5. 000 3. 0 plus - for each 340040al 100 31 or fraction thereof a half of 10031, to and Including 10, 0003V. plus - for each additional 10031 -or fraction thereola hag of 10063.8and including 20, 00031- pus • for each additional 100. or fraction Merest a half of 10031. B and including 20, 000 31, pu, ? REF! for each oddi9ona110051. or nudism thereof , hall of 10031,0 and including 50, 00031. plus PREP! for each additional 100 31 or bastion thereof 60, 00 plus - for each additional 10031. or Mction thereof 0 hag of 10031Jo and inducing 5, 060 3. 1. plus - for each additional 10031. or fraction thereof a half of 10031, Is and including 10, 000 3. 0 plus - for each additional 100 slot fraction Mereol a hal of 1005.. to and including 2000011. plus • for each additional 1003.?, or fraction thereol, ha6 of 10031„ to and Including 20. 000 31. plus 85E41 Br each additional 10091. ot fraction thereof » half of100a,?., to and Including 50. 000 3.1. plus PREF! for each a044,,, l 100 s1. or fraction thereof 51, 74010 plus 43, 50 fits each additional 10031. or fraction Inureofa half of 100 s-1., to and including 3003,
1. 870. 5 plus 154. 88 for each additional 100 a. or fraction Memo?, hal of 10031. Pa and including 50031.
2.40.5 pus 10150 for sash additional 100 slot fraction thereol half of 1003,, to and 2, 54475
2, 990. 63
plus
plus
63. 70
91. 35
for
for
each
each
additions/
addibionat
103
100
V.
slot
sr fraction
fraction
thereof
thereof
ahalf
a hag
of10031., toand '
of 10031,. 1s and
krcudirg800a, f.
n08rding1500, gIncluding 2, 08031
3, 447, 35 plus 122. 82 for sash add0onal 1006.?, or fraction thereof 81, 326. 75 plus 16.3 l,reach additional 100 slot fraction thereof a half of 100 31.. to and including 300 3f, 1381,3 plus 119, 63 Breach add: ona? 1001. or fraction thereof a hag of 10031„ to and npludng 500 s. f. 1, 620. 38 plus 39. 88 for each additional 100310r Ndion thereof 1, 740, 0
a hal of 100 s, f„ to and ncWing8001. 1
plus 38. 54 for each additional 10031. or fraction thereof a hal of 1003., to and Including 150011, 2011. 88 plus 21. 67 for each additional 1005J. orfraction thereof a hall of 100 1.0, to and including 2, 000 31. 2, 153, 25 pus 3108 for each additional 10031. or traction thereof 02, 707. 85 plus 30. 45 for each additional 160,, 01traction 514. 010 hell of 100 V.. to and including 1, 0003,?. 3, 012. 30 plus 11.5 Br each additional 100 slot fraction thereof a hall of 10031„ to and including 500031 3, 45025 plus 15, 23 ( or each * Maul 100s,?. or fraction thereof, hat of 10031, to and ncudin910, 00031
4. 219. 50 plus 729 for each additional 100 slot fraction Merest hat of 1003/, loard including 20, 00031, 4, 948, 13 plus 3. 19 Br each 300, 99na110031. ot fraction Memo,. hal of 100 s. l, to and Including 50, 020 11,
5. 905, 13 pus 423 for each additional 100.: or fraction thereof
11. 054. 88 pus 24. 47 for each 01450, al1031. or Mcl,, n Meteda half of 100sl„ to and including 400 cf. 1,52. 75 pus 59. 61 / 0r each additional 10031, or fraction thereola ham of 100 s. f.. to and Including 600. 1. 1272. 38 plus 32. 63 for each additional 10031. or traction thereof hag of 1003, to and including 1000 1. 0
1. 402, 88 plus 2025 breach additional 100 5,1. or fraction thereon hell of100s- 1-, to and including 1, 5003.?.
1. 544, 25 plus 63, 77 for each additional 100 sl. or fraction thereof a half of 10031., to and Including 20, 000 3. 1. 1, 620. 38 plus 84, 57 lot each add0on, 1100 31. or fraction Memo? City at2nnin5 Sher 3e< 5tudy 9uqing r«
72 Planning Department
Planning Fees*
Description
Current
Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Adult Ent Zoning Permit 7, 562. 00
2 Annexation Fee 4,89. 00 Deposit
3 Appeal of PC Decision 7, 155. 00
4 Appeal of Planning Dept. Decision 4, 942. 00
5 Certificate of Completion/ Lot Line Adj 1, 086.0
6 Clarification of Ambiguity/ Omission 1, 723. 00
7 Conditional Use Permit 4, 779. 00
8 Conditional Use Permit Amend 7, 211. 00
9 CUP - sexually oriented business 5, 031.0
10 Design Review 4, 904. 00
11 Design Review Amend New
12 Development Agreements 8, 352. 00 Deposit
13 EIR- City Admin Charge
6, 417 +
consultant' s
fees
Deposit
14 Environmental - Mitigation Monitoring New Deposit
15 Environmental Assessment - ND or MND 3, 124. 00
16 Environmental Filing Fee/ Environmental Fish and Game Fee New 17 Extension of Time, CUP or Design Review New
18 Final Parcel Map 4, 379. 00
19 Final Tract Map ( 51 + lots) 8, 195. 00 Plus 70/ lot 20 Final Tract Map ( first 50 lot) 4, 885. 00
21 General Plan Amendment (Land Use) 6, 192. 00
22 General Plan Amendment (Policy) 6, 900. 0
23 Landscape - minor 884. 00
24 Landscape review - major 2, 030.
25 Lot Line Adjustment 1, 086.0
26 Lot Merger 761. 00
A 3%Technical and FaMibes based surcharge will be added to all Flat and Deposit Based Application Fees City of Banning User Fee Study
Full Cost
Subsidy Suggested
Fee
931. 55 712% 7, 562. 00 0
8, 236. 13 58, 845. 00 Deposit
1, 829. 1 0% 51, 829. 00 74%
53, 498. 76 0% 3, 498. 00 29%
51, 916. 60 0% 1, 965. 00 81%
789. 23 0% 789. 00 54%
4, 718. 11 0% 54, 718. 00 1%
4, 374. 93 0% 4, 374. 00 39%
2, 313. 59 0% 2, 313. 00 54%
55, 881.4 0% 5, 881. 00 20%
4,74.0 NA 4,74. 00 New
Variable NA 26, 008.0 Deposit
Variable NA 513, 226. 00 Deposit
Variable NA 5, 000. Deposit
8, 161. 33 1% 8, 209. 00 163%
NA NA Actual Cost Actual Cost
5717. 0 0% 717. 00 New
958. 38 0% 5958. 00 78%
1, 885. 73 0% 51, 885. 00 77%
1, 514. 79 0% 1, 514. 00 69%
58, 008. 1 0% 8, 008.0 29%
7, 070.4 0% 7, 070. 2%
935. 72 0% 5935. 00 6%
1, 028. 46 0% 1, 028.0 49%
797. 92 NA 5797. 00 27%
5673. 81 0% 673. 00 12%
Planning Fees
73 Planning Department
Planning Fees *
Description
Current
Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
27 Cannabis Cultivation Permit - Personal 170. 00
28 Minor develop plan review - SFD 890. 00
29 Minor modification of an Application 2, 465. 00
30 Mural permit 51, 310. 0
31 Planning letters 55- $80
32 Pre App Review New
33 Request for Public Hearing 1, 802. 00
34 Sign Permit - Freestanding Sign New
35 Sign Permit - Panel Change Only New
36 Sign Review 5537. 00
37 Site Plan Review 5, 885. 00
38 Specific Plan 59, 863. 00 Deposit
39 Specific Plan Amend 10, 405. 00 Deposit
40 Temp Signs 5235. 00
41 Temp use permit 51, 001.0
Sidewalk Vending Temporary Use Permit New Flat
42 Tentative Map Time Extension 4, 258. 00
43 Tentative Parcel Map 9, 811. 00
44 Tentative Tract Map (Less than 50 lots) 7,57. 00 Deposit 45 Tentative Tract Map (50 lots or more) New Deposit
46 Tentative Tract Map Condition Monitoring New Deposit 47 Variance 4, 292. 00
48 Zone Change 8, 524. 00
49 Zone Text Amend. 6, 900. 0
50 Technology Surcharge added to all Fees above 50. 00
A 3% Technical and Facilities based surcharge will be added to all Flat and Deposit Based Application Fees Full Cost
Subsidy Suggested
Fee
779. 46 67% 255. 00 50%
5890. 67 0% 890. 00 0%
1, 011. 73 0% 1, 011.0 59%
5650. 06 0% 650. 00 50%
168. 82 0% 168. 00 50%
1, 410. 15 NA No Charge N/ A
51, 953. 2 0% 1, 953. 00 8%
499. 85 0% 5499. 00 N/ A
5108. 42 0% 108. 00 N/ A
278. 90 0% 278. 00 48%
5859. 9 0% 859. 00 85%
Variable NA 16,33. 00 Deposit
Variable NA 511, 656. 00 Deposit
278. 90 0% 278. 00 18%
51, 065. 86 0% 51, 065.0 6%
0.0 0% 50. 00 0%
53,08. 07 0% 3, 508. 00 18%
8, 253.7 0% 8, 253. 00 16%
58, 936. 41 1% 8, 985. 00 Deposit
9,83. 7 0% 59, 983. 00 Deposit
NA 55, 000. Deposit
4, 269. 81 0% 54, 269. 00 1%
6, 917. 76 0% 6, 917. 00 19%
6, 950. 07 0% 6, 950. 0 1%
0% 2.5%
City of Banning User Fee Study Planning Fees
74 Misc. Utility Customer Service Fees
Water & Waste Water Utility Fees
Description
Current
Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Water Deposit - Residential - Initial - Credit Check
2 Green Rating
3 Yellow Rating
4 Red Rating
5 Water Deposit - No Credit Check or Letter of Credit
6 Water Deposit - All Other Classes of Service New
7 Water Deposit - Reconnection After Processing for Non - Payment New 8 Water Account Set - Up Fee - next business day 27. 00 9 Water Account Set - Up Fee - Same Day ( 8: 00 a. m. to 12: 00 p. m.) 30. 00 t Water Account Set - Up Fee - Same Day ( 12: 00 p. m. to 3: 00 p. m.) 30. 00 Water Account Set - Up Fee - After Hours ( 3: 00 - 8: 00 a. m. next business day & holidays and weekends)
146. 00
12 Water Meter Reinstallation Fee 95. 00
Customer self restore
and/ or damaged meter
13 Cut/ Broken Lock Fee New
14 After p. m. Von fee 146. 00
Water Meter Installation Fee of (Brand New Service)
15 3/ 4" Meter 258. 00 Per Meter
16 1" Meter 384. 00 Per Meter
17 1 1/ 2 " Meter 580. 00 Per Meter
18 2" Meter 765. 00 Per Meter
19 Anything larger than 2"T & M Per Meter
20 Water Meter Test Fee 80. 00 One test free per year Add' Itests are $ 80. 00 21 Water Backflow/ Cross Connection Testing 82. 00 Plus materials 22 Backflow Device Installation - Time & Materials T & M Each 23 Fire Flow Test 92. 00 Each
24 Installation of Gate Valve Fee 87. 00 Per hour + Materials 25 Water Service Lateral Installation ( 3/ 4" Meter) 4, 025.0 Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
NA NA 0.0
NA NA 100. 00
NA NA 150. 00
NA NA 150. 00
NA NA
2X est average for
location or min of
50. 00
NA NA 3X est ave bill
29. 00 NA 30. 00 11%
32. 00 NA 35. 00 17%
44. 00 NA 45. 00 50%
220. 00 NA 219. 00 50%
139. 00 NA 142. 00 49%
15. 00
217. 00 NA 219. 00 50%
284. 00 285. 00 10%
410. 00 414. 00 8%
602. 00 608. 00 5%
873. 00 875. 00 14%
T&M
98. 00 100. 00 25%
82. 00 0%
T&M
94. 00 95. 00 3%
87. 00 0%
4, 025.0 0%
City of Banning User Fee Study Misc Utility Fees
75 Misc. Utility Customer Service Fees
26 Water Service Lateral Installation (1" Meter) 4, 140. 0 27 Water Service Lateral Installation (11/ 2" Meter) 4, 685. 00 28 Water Service Lateral Installation (2" Meter) 4, 855. 00 29 Water Service Lateral Installation (>2" Meter) T & M Time & Material 30 Construction water meter deposit (hydrant meter) 500. 00 Per Meter 31 Sewer Connection Investigation - Dye Check 82. 00
32 Trespass/ Diversion/ Theft of Service 250. 00 1st offense 33 Trespass/ Diversion/ Theft of Service 500. 00 2nd offense 4, 140. 0 0%
4, 685. 00 0%
4, 855. 00 0%
T&M
NA NA 800. 00
94. 00 95. 00 16%
NA NA 300. 00 20%
NA NA 600. 00 20%
City of Banning User Fee Study Misc Utility Fees
76 Misc. Utility Customer Service Fees
Miscellaneous Fees
it Description
Current
Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Delinquent Notice Fee 13. 50
Account balances
more than $ 75 31
days past due
2 Door Hanger Fee 13. 50
3 Late Fee New
1. 5 % of unpaid
balance after 30 days
but less than $ 75
4 Non -Sufficient PaPayment Y ( Return Fee -& Check Autopay) P YJ 25. 00 Add $ 13. 50 Door
Hanger
1st Occurance
5 Non -Sufficient Payment Return Fee - ( Check & Autopay) 35. 00 Add $ 13. 50 Door
Hanger
2nd Occurance within
12 months
Processing Fee for Credit Check for Deposit Determination New Each Person 7 Processing Fee for Non - Payment New per service
Electric Utility Fees
8 Description
Current
Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Reconnection Charge (Additional) OH or UG service terminated by electric crew
265. 00
2 Reconnection Charge ( Additional) Service Drop removed by electric crew
265. 00
3 Trespass/ Diversion/ Theftof Service 250. 00 1st Offense 4 Customer Requested Electric Operations Service Call " Trip Charge" New Charge is assessed if an
additional trip is required
to complete the service
call, due to customer
oversight
5 Electric Deposit - Residential - Initial - Credit Check New 6 Green Rating
7 Yellow Rating
8 Red Rating
City of Banning User Fee Study
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
NA NA 18. 50 27%
18. 50 27%
NA NA
10 % of unpaid
balance after
30 days but less
than $ 75. 00
NA
25. 00
Add New Door
Hanger Fee
535. 00
Add New Door
Hanger Fee
2. 50
NA NA 545. 00 NA
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
558. 83 29% 397. 00 33%
265. 02 0% 265. 00 0%
NA NA 975. 00
5124. 68 1% 124. 00
NA NA 0.0
NA NA 100. 00
NA NA 5150. 0
Misc Utility Fees
77 Misc. Utility Customer Service Fees
9 Electric Deposit - No Credit Check or Letter of Credit 10 Electric Deposit - All Other Classes of Service New
2X est average for
location or min of
100. 00
Electric Deposit - Reconnection After Processing for Non - Payment New Electric Account Set - Up Fee - next business day 27. 00 Electric Account Set - Up Fee - Same Day ( 8: 00 a. m. to 12: 00 p. m.) 30. 00 14 Electric Account Set - Up Fee - Same Day ( 12: 00 p. m. to 3: 00 p. m.) 30. 00 15 Electric Account Set - Up Fee - After Hours ( 3: 00 - 8: 00 a. m. next business day & holidays and weekends)
146. 00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
150. 00
2X est average
for location or
min of $100. 00
3X est ave bill
30. 00
35. 00
45. 00
219. 00
10%
14%
33%
33%
City of Banning User Fee Study Misc Utility Fees
78 Police
Fees Below are Set By BMC Codes
Description
Fee ( Penalty/ Late
Fee) Unit Governing Code
1 Prohibited Stopping or Parking at red curb 45. 00" 13- 21 BMC 2 Prohibited Stopping or Parking 558. 00* 13- 22A BMC
3 Parking not to Obstruct Traffic 58. 00" 13- 23 BMC
4 All night and vehicle maintenance parking prohibited 50. 00*/$0 13- 24 BMC 5 Standing or Parking on one- way roadway 45. 00*/$0 13- 25 BMC 6 Parking on grades 45. 00*/$ 45. 00 13- 26 BMC
7 Unlawful parking -- peddlers, vendors 80. 00*/$0 13- 27 BMC 8 Temporary parking restrictions 45. 00"/$0 13- 28 BMC
9 Time limit parking zones -- green curbs 58. 00* 13- 29 BMC 10 Parking within space markings 45. 00*/$0 13- 30 BMC
11 Parking in freight and passenger loading zones -- time limits
45. 00*/$0 13- 32 BMC
12 Stopping in Alley 58. 00" 13- 33 BMC
Designated bus and taxicab zones 80. 00*/$0 13- 34 BMC
Restricted use of Bus and Taxicab zones 58. 00" 13- 35 BMC 15 Trailer or semi - trailer parking prohibited 80. 00*/$0 13- 39 BMC 16 Commercial Parking in Business & Residential districts 80. 00*/$0 13- 40 BMC 17 Parking in excess of 72 hours 45. 00" 10.2. 045 BMC
18 Commercial vehicle -- parking prohibited 5113. 00* 10.6. 020 BMC 19 Vehicle parked transporting animals/ nuisance 100. 00* 10.6. 020A1 BMC 20 Vehicle parked with hazardous substance within city 100. 00* 10.6. 020A2 BMC 21 Vehicle parked on road for repair 100. 00" 10.6. 020A3 BMC 22 Commercial vehicles over 10, 000 lbs. parking in
residential area
113. 00* 10.6. 020B1 BMC
23 Commercial vehicles over 10, 000lbs. parking on
lot/ unimproved
113. 00" 10.6. 02082 BMC
24 Commercial vehicles over 10, 000 lbs. parking within 100 ft of residential area
113. 00` 10.6. 02083 BMC
25 Commercial vehicles over 10, 000 lbs. parking within 150 ft of driveway opening
113. 00* 10.6. 02084 BMC
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee A
NA NA 545. 00* 0
NA NA 58. 00" 0
NA NA 58. 00" 0
NA NA 50. 00*/$0 0
NA NA 45. 00"/$0 50
NA NA 45. 00*/$0 0
NA NA 80. 00*/$0 0
NA NA 45. 00*/$0 50
NA NA 58. 00* 50
NA NA 45. 00*/$0 50
NA NA 45. 00*/$0 50
NA NA 58. 00* 0
NA NA 80. 00*/$0 0
NA NA 558. 00* 0
NA NA 80. 00*/$0 0
NA NA 80. 00*/$0 50
NA NA 45. 00* 0
NA NA 113. 00* 0
NA NA 100. 00" 0
NA NA 100. 00" 50
NA NA 5100. 0* 0
NA NA 5113. 00* 0
NA NA 5113. 00* 0
NA NA 113. 00* 0
NA NA 113. 00" 0
City of Banning User Fee Study Police Fees
79 Police
26 Commercial vehicles over 10, 000 lbs. parking in
commercial property
113. 00* 10.6. 02085 BMC
27 Commercial vehicles over 10, 000 Ibs. parking in non - residential property
113. 00* 10.6. 02086 BMC
28 Commercial vehicles over 10, 000 lbs. parking in alley 113. 00* 10.6. 02087 BMC 29 Commercial vehicles over 10, 000 Ibs. parking adjacent to public facility
113. 00* 10.6. 02088 BMC
30 Commercial vehicles over 10, 000 lbs. unattached trailer 113. 00* 10.6. 02089 BMC 31 Commercial vehicles over 10, 000 lbs. idling over 15 minutes
113. 00* 10.6. 020C BMC
32 Unregistered vehicle 73, 00* 4000A CVC
33 Display of license plate 73. 00* 5200 CVC
34 Improper Display of Tabs 30. 00" 5204A CVC
35 Unauthorized Parking on Public Grounds 35. 00* 21113A CVC 36 Stopping/ Parkingin Bicycle lane 35. 00* 21211A CVC
Parking within Intersection 48. 00* 22500A CVC
Parking in Crosswalk 48. 00* 22500B CVC
s Parking adjacent to Safety Zone 48. 00* 22500C CVC
40 Parking within 15 feet of Fire Station Driveway 48. 00* 22500D CVC 41 Parking blocking a driveway 48. 00* 22500E CVC
42 Parking on a sidewalk 48. 00* 22500F CVC
43 Parking blocking excavation 48. 00* 225000 CVC
44 Double Parking 48. 00* 22500H CVC
45 Parking in a posted bus zone 263. 00* 225001 CVC
46 Parking on a bridge 48. 00* 22500K CVC
47 Parking blocking wheelchair access 338. 00* 22500L CVC 48 Parking in posted Fire lane 80. 00* 22500. 1 CVC
49 Parking more than 18" from the curb 48. 00* 22502A CVC 50 Posted no parking 35. 00* 22505B CVC
51 Parking in/ Obstructing space designated for the
disabled
338. 00* 22507. 8A CVC
52 Obstrucing/ blocking disabled space 338. 00* 22507. 88 CVC 53 Parking on blue crosshatch 338. 00* 22507. 8C CVC
54 Obstructing disabled parking space 338. 00* 22507. 8C1 CVC 55 Obstructing disabled parking space 338. 00* 22507. 8C2 CVC NA NA 113. 00* 0
NA NA 113. 00* 0
NA NA 113. 00* 0
NA NA 113. 00* 0
NA NA 113. 00* 0
NA NA 113. 00* 0
NA NA 73. 00* 0
NA NA 73. 00* 0
NA NA 30. 00* 0
NA NA 35. 00* 0
NA NA 35. 00* 0
NA NA 48. 00* 0
NA NA 48. 00* 0
NA NA 48. 00* 0
NA NA 48. 00* 0
NA NA 48. 00* 0
NA NA 48. 00* o
NA NA 48. 00" 0
NA NA 48. 00* 0
NA NA 263. 00* 0
NA NA 48. 00* 0
NA NA 338. 00* 0
NA NA 80. 00* 0
NA NA 48. 00* 0
NA NA 35. 00* 0
NA NA 338. 00* 0
NA NA 338. 00* 0
NA NA 338. 00* 0
NA NA 338. 00* 0
NA NA 338. 00* 0
City of Banning User Fee Study Police Fees
80 Police
56 Parking within 15' of Fire hydrant 535. 00* 22514 CVC 57 Unattended vehicle 35. 00" 225156 CVC
58 Locking person in vehicle 535. 00* 22516 CVC
59 Parking within 7. 5 feet of railroad track 535. 00* 22521 CVC 60 Parking within 3' of a sidewalk access ramp 338. 00" 22522 CVC 61 Abandoned vehicle 275. 00*/$ 50. 00 22523 CVC
Towing and Storage Services Fees - Below Set By Contract 9 Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Base Towing Rate - Class A Tow Truck 130. 00
per hour, 1 hr
minimum
2 Heavy Duty Towing Rate - Class B Tow Truck 165. 00
per hour, 1 hr
minimum
3 Heavy Duty Towing Rate - Class C and D Tow Truck 250. 00 per hour 4 Related Service 350. 00
per hour for crane
recovery
Lock Out (no towing required) 65. 00
Lock Out ( towing required) No Charge
7 Dolly No Charge
8 After Hours Release Fee 65. 00
9 Storage
9a Automobiles 30. 00 per day, outside
9b Automobiles 35. 00 per day, inside
9c Motorcycles 15. 00 per day, outside
9d Motorcycles 20. 00 per day, inside
9e Trucks, 1 ton under 20 ft. 40. 00 per day
9f Trucks, over 20 ft. 50. 00 per day, per unit
Miscellaneous
9 Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 All Reports - Black & White 50. 25 per copy
2 All Reports - Color 0. 35 per copy
3 Report Request Form - Black & White 0. 25 per copy
4 Report Request Form - Color 0. 35 per copy
NA NA 35. 00* 0
NA NA 35. 00* 0
NA NA 35. 00* 0
NA NA 35. 00* 0
NA NA 338. 00" 0
NA NA 275. 00*/$ 50. 00 0
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee A
NA NA 130. 00 0
NA NA 165. 00 0
NA NA 250. 00 0
NA NA 350. 00 0
NA NA 65. 00 0
NA NA No Charge NA
NA NA No Charge NA
NA NA 565. 00 0
NA NA 30. 00 0
NA NA 35. 00 NA
NA NA 15. 00 0
NA NA 20. 00 0
NA NA 40. 00 0
NA NA 550. 00 0
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee A
NA NA 0. 25 0
NA NA 0. 35 0
NA NA 0. 25 0
NA NA 0. 35 0
City of Banning User Fee Study Police Fees
81 Police
5 Special Events Charge ( 4 hr minimum) 65. 00
per officer, per
hour
6 Special Events Charge ( 4 hr minimum) 70. 00
per corporal, per
hour
7 Special Events Charge ( 4 hr minimum) 80. 00
per sergeant, per
hour
8 Special Events Charge (4 hr minimum) New
Per Lieutenant, per
hour
9 Special Events Charge ( 4 hr minimum) New
Per Captain, per
hour
10 DUI Investigation & Fine 5110. 0 per vehicle
11 DUI Enforcement Charge
Same as special
events chg
12 DUI Recovery New
Allowed under California
Government Code Sections
53155; cannot exceed
512, 000
K- 9 Unit Service Charge
Same as special
events chg
14 Public Dance Fee
Same as special
events chg
15 Traffic Control Fee
Same as special
events chg
16 Vehicle Storage Release 577. 00 per vehicle
17 Vehicle Storage Release - 30 day New per vehicle
18 False Alarm Response none 1st response
19 False Alarm Response none 2nd response
20 False Alarm Response 572. 00 3rd response
21 False Alarm Response 5144. 00 4th response
22 False Alarm Response 144. 00 5th + response
23 Clearance Letter Fee 525. 00 per letter
24 Photo Sales Charges 510. 00 per print
25 Bicycle Licenses 6. 00 per licence
26 Fingerprint Fee 515. 00
D. O. J. fees if
applicable
102. 84 5% 97. 50 33
124.6 15% 5105. 00 35
5130. 37 8% 120. 00 40
192. 39 45% 105. 00 NA
180. 72 31% 125. 00 NA
NA NA 5110. 0 0
NA NA
Same as special
events chg
NA
Variable NA
Actual Cost Up to
12, 000
NA
NA NA
Same as special
events chg
NA
NA NA
Same as special
events chg
NA
NA NA
Same as special
events chg
NA
NA NA 115. 50 39
NA NA 115. 50 NA
NA NA none NA
NA NA none NA
NA NA 572. 00 NA
NA NA 144. 00 NA
NA NA 5144. 00 NA
527. 70 10% 525. 00 0
10. 00 0% 10. 00 0
NA 0% 5. 00 51
NA NA 15. 00 0
City of Banning User Fee Study Police Fees
82 Police
27 Vacant & Distressed Buildin g
Fee 75. 00
Each Property/ Pr
Year
Resolution 2009- 0
28 Tape Duplication Fee 30. 00 per tape
29 Civil Court Case Charge
Actual Salary
Involved
75. 00
17. 21 13% 15. 00 15
NA NA
Actual Salary
Involved
NA
City of Banning User Fee Study Police Fees
83 Fire Department
Plan Review/ Inspection
Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Residential Plan Review/ Inspection 5134. 00 per hour ( 1 hr. min.) 2 Commercial/ Industrial Plan Review/ Inspection 5134. 00 per hour (1 hr. min.) 3 Automatic Fire Extinguisher Plan Review/ Inspection 5134. 00 per hr./ person 1 Fire Alarm Plan Review/ Inspection 5134. 00 per hr./ person 5 Sprinkler System Plan Review/ Inspection 5134. 00 per hr./ person Fire Code Compliance Inspection "' ""' '
Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Annual State Mandated Inspection 134. 00
per hr./ person (1 hr
min.)
2 Operational Permit Annual Inspection New per hour ( 1 hr. min.) 3 New Business Fire Hazard Inspection 134. 00
per hr./ person (1 hr.
min.)
4 Engine Company Inspection
5 Inspection no fee
6 1st Reinspection no fee
7 Subsequent reinspection 5134. 00 per hr./ person
8 Fire Suppression Cost Recovery Actual Cost
9 Fire Prevention Investigation Covered by County Contract 10 EMT Service, Non- resident Covered by County Contract 11 Care Facility serving 25 or fewer persons 550. 00 Mandated by State 12 Care Facility serving 26 or more persons 5100. 0 Mandated by State 13 Hazardous Materials Record Location
13. a Category 1, Level la 5268. 00
13. b Category 1, Level 1b 5335. 00
13. c Category 2, Level 2a 5268. 00
13. d Category 2, Level 2b 5335. 00
13. e Category 3, Level 3a 5402. 00
13. f Category 3, Level 3b 469. 00
14 Hazardous Materials Response Actual Cost
15 Non Compliance Fee New per hour ( 1 hr. min.)
16 Special Event fee New per hour ( 1 hr. min.)
17 Special Event - Inspection Fee New per hour ( 1 hr. min.) Full Cost Subsidy 96 Suggested Fee 0/-
5181. 72 0% 5182. 00 26%
5181. 72 096 5182. 00 26%
5181. 72 096 5182. 00 2696
5181. 72 096 182. 00 26%
5181. 72 0% 5182. 00 26%
Full Cost Subsidy 96 Suggested Fee
5181. 72 0% 5182. 00 2696
5181. 72 096 5182. 00 N/ A
5181. 72 096 5182. 00 2696
50. 00 10096 50. 00 N/ A
50. 00 10096 50. 00 N/ A
5181. 72 096 5182. 00 26%
NA NA Actual Cost NA
NA NA
Covered by County
Contract
NA
NA NA
Covered by County
Contract
NA
NA NA 50. 00 50
NA NA 5100. 0 50
NA NA 5268. 00 50
NA NA 5335. 00 50
NA NA 268. 00 50
NA NA 5335. 00 50
NA NA 5402. 00 50
NA NA 5469. 00 50
Variable NA Actual Cost NA
5181. 72 0% 5182. 00 NA
5181. 72 096 5182. 00 NA
5181. 72 096 5182. 00 NA
City of Banning User Fee Study Fire Fees
84 Engineering
Public Works Permit Fees
Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit Notes
1 Curb & Gutter - < 100 ft. 60. 00
2 Curb & Gutter -> 100 ft. New per 100 ft
3 Sidewalk - <400 sq. ft 60. 00
4 Sidewalk - >400 sq. ft New per 100 ft
5 Pavement - < 1000 ft. 120. 00
6 Pavement - each additional 1000 ft. New
7 Driveway approach - Residential 560. 00 Each
8 Driveway approach - Commercial 81. 00 Each
9 Wheelchair Ramp 560. 00 Each
10 Cross gutter/ spandrel 103. 00 Each
11 Sewer main, storm drain, water main <50 ft. 582. 00
2 Sewer main, storm drain, water main >50 ft. New per 50 LF Sewer lateral 60. 00 Each
14 Water service 560. 00 Each
15 Sewer manhole 81. 00 Each
16 Sewer Clean out 82. 00 Each
17 Water line Hot Tap 174. 00 Each
Includes the water
main run in r/w
18 Storm Drain Inlet 189. 00 Each
19 Storm Drain Connector pipe 145. 00 Each
20 Parkway drain 581. 00 Each
21 Fire Hydrant 270. 00 Each
22 Air Vac blow off 5103. 00 Each
23 Street Tree 560. 00 Each
24 Street name & traffic sign 60. 00 Each
25 Dye Test 5104. 00 Each
26 Penalty for work w/ o permit 244. 00
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
595.2 1% 95. 00 37%
542. 84 0% 543. 00 N/ A
595.2 1% 595. 00 37%
18. 79 1% 19. 00 N/ A
148. 20 0% 148. 00 19%
595.2 1% 595. 00 N/ A
95. 52 1% 96. 00 38%
121. 86 1% 5121. 00 33%
95. 52 1% 96. 00 38%
138. 36 0% 5138. 00 25%
173.2 0% 173. 00 53%
42. 84 0% 43. 00 N/ A
90. 32 0% 90. 00 33%
590. 32 0% 590. 00 33%
116. 66 1% 5116. 00 30%
5116. 6 1% 116. 00 29%
5195. 68 0% 195. 00 11%
227.2 0% 5227. 00 17%
5174. 0% 5174. 00 17%
121. 86 1% 121. 00 33%
319. 56 0% 319. 00 15%
253. 56 1% 5250. 0 59%
595.2 1% 595. 00 37%
595.2 1% 95. 00 37%
144. 00 0% 5144. 00 28%
NA NA x 2 permit fee NA
City of Banning User Fee Study Engineering Fees
85 Engineering
27 Overtime inspection 154. 00
28 Re - Inspection Fee 1. 5 x time spent
Excavation permit
Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit
1 Individual project ( parallel to street) 5189. 00
2 Individual project ( across the street) 188. 00
Preliminary Project Review
Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit
1 Specific Plan - preliminary 3, 871. 00
2 Specific Plan amendment - preliminary 2, 540. 0
E. I.R - preliminary 52, 862. 00
Drainage study 51, 240. 0
5 Soils Report New
6 WQMP Review Deposit 53, 000. Deposit
7 Traffic study 2, 504. 00
8 Tentative parcel map - preliminary 51, 843. 00
9 Tentative tract map - preliminary 52,31. 00
10 Tent map- (MH, RV)- preliminary 2, 360. 0
11 Tent Comm/ Indus parcel > 4 lots- preliminary 2, 429. 00 12 Site Plan 289. 00
13 Plot Plan 289. 00
14 Condominium - preliminary 51, 023.0
15 Consultant service - preliminary
184. 00 + consultant' s
fee
Final Map Review
Description Current Fee/ Charge
4, 885. 00
Unit
1 Final map - 0 - 50 lots
City of Banning User Fee Study
5210. 72 NA 75% of permit fee NA
NA NA 25% of permit fee NA
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
5227. 22 0% 227. 00 38
5227. 22 0% 227. 00 539
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
Deposit 5, 000. Deposit
Deposit 53, 000. Deposit
Deposit 5, 000. Deposit
2, 742. 19 2% 52, 800. 0 56%
52, 742. 19 52, 800. 0 N/ A
Deposit 3, 000. Deposit
52, 800. 97 0% 2, 800. 0 11%
52, 238. 97 0% 2,38. 00 18%
53, 130. 97 0% 3, 130. 0 19%
53, 130. 97 0% 53, 130. 0 25%
2, 909. 54 0% 52, 909. 00 17%
5360. 91 0% 360. 00 20%
5392. 15 0% 392. 00 26%
51, 210.4 0% 1, 210. 0 15%
NA
10% over
consultants fee
NA
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
57, 411. 56 0% 7, 420. 0 34%
Engineering Fees
86 Engineering
2 Final map - 51 or more lots
58, 159. 00 +$70. 00 per
lot
per add' tlot
over50
3 Third check up -final 5914. 00
4 Certificate of Correction - final 836. 00
5 Amend Map -final 932. 00
6 Consultant service - final
fee
5183. 00 + consultant' s
Deposit
Grading
Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit
1 Rough grading 1-5 sheets 1, 734. 00
2 Rough grading 6-9 sheets 2, 843. 00
3 Rough grading 10- 20 sheets 54, 691. 00
Rough grading per sheet above 20 sheets New
Precise Grading 0- 49 lots 51, 249. 00
6 Precise Grading Per lot over 49 lots New
7 Grading/ Stockpile Permit 51- 100 CY 45. 00
8 Grading/ Stockpile Permit 101-, 000 CY 545. 00
Plus $ 21 for every 100
cy or fraction thereof
9 Grading/ Stockpile Permit 1, 001- 10, 00 CY 230. 00
Plus $ 25 for every
1, 000 cy or fraction
thereof
10 Grading/ Stockpile Permit 10, 001- 100, 000 CY 380. 00 Plus $ 75 for every
10, 000 cy or fraction
thereof
11 Grading/ Stockpile Permit 100, 01 or more CY 51, 075.0 Plus $ 85 for every
10, 000 cy or fraction
thereof
12, 561. 76
55, 991. 00+ 590. 00
per lot
2168
5949. 34 0% 5950. 0 4%
5999. 0 0% 51, 000. 16%
51, 092.4 0% 1, 095.0 15%
NA NA
10% over
consultant
NA
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
52, 485. 3 0% 2, 490. 0 30%
3, 816. 60 0% 53, 820. 0 26%
7, 042. 81 0% 7, 050. 33%
59, 047. 18
57, 050 + $250 per
sheet
N/ A
52,54. 62 0% 2, 554. 00 51%
2, 477. 29
52,54. 00+ 540. 00
per lot
N/ A
552. 68 1% 52. 00 13%
552. 68 1% 52. 00 13%
293.2 0% 5293. 00 22%
492. 51 0% 5492. 00 23%
51, 383. 60 0% 1, 383. 00 22%
City of Banning User Fee Study Engineering Fees
87 Engineering
Inspections
8 Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit
1 Inspections - Subdivision Developments 4% of est. constr. costs 2 Industrial Waste Inspection 175. 00
3 NPDES Inspection 110. 00 per lot
Final Parcel Map
if Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit
1 P. C. Final Map - 1st Sheet Variable
1st Sheet
Only
2 P. C. Final Map - Additional sheet Variable
Each
Add' tSheet
scellaneous Fees
Description Current Fee/ Charge Unit
1 Flood Zone Development 705. 00
2 Encroachment permit 352. 00
3 Over sized/ wight permit (Caltrans Rate) 16. 00 Per Trip 4 Reimbursement agreement 1, 056.0 Each
5 Dedication Document 224. 00 Each
6 Street Abandonment 435. 00 Each
7 Service Letter 63. 00 Each
8 Lot Line Adjustment 619. 00 Each
9 Lot Merger 5619. 00 Each
10 Certificate of Compliance 653. 00 Each
11 Plan Storage & GIS Maintenance Fee 12. 00 per sheet
12a 24" x 36" or Smaller Printout 512. 00 per sheet
12b 24" x 36" or Smaller Printout 12. 00 per sheet
13 Appeals to City Council or Planning Commission 543. 00 Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
NA NA
4% of est. constr.
costs
NA
NA NA
Consultant costs +
10%
NA
158. 04 0% 158. 00 30%
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
2,64. 92 0% 2,75. 00 NA
5807. 24 0% 810. 00 NA
Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee
1, 093. 5 0% 1, 095.0 36%
218. 39 0% 218. 00 61%
15. 62 2% 16. 00 0%
51, 084. 0% 1, 084.0 3%
407. 33 1% 410. 00 45%
1,68. 32 0% 1,70. 0 63%
595. 17 0% 95. 00 34%
5814. 67 0% 5814. 00 24%
5814. 67 0% 5814. 00 24%
814. 67 0% 5814. 00 20%
22. 75 1% 23. 00 48%
519. 37 3% 20. 00 40%
510. 12 1% 10. 00 20%
639. 19 0% 5639. 00 15%
City of Banning User Fee Study Engineering Fees
88 Engineering
14 Landscape Maintenance District - Annexation 3, 986. 00 15 Assessment/ Mello Roos District Deposit 510, 00 min
16 Technology
Surcharge New
Sf
k=
e
0 3s'r'':, iYi h".
1 Improvement Plan Review: 1- 5 Sheets New
2 Improvement Plan Review: 5- 10 Sheets New
3 Improvement Plan Review: 10- 20 Sheets New
4 Improvement Plan Review: 20+ Sheets New
City of Banning
NA NA 3, 986. 00 NA
NA NA 510, 00 min NA
2.5%
51, 185. 23 NA 51, 235. 00 NA
3, 499. 22 NA 3, 650. 0 NA
55, 405. 66 NA 5, 705. 00 NA
58, 132. 69 NA 58,35. 00 NA
User Fee Study Engineering Fees
89 EXHIBIT B
NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
90 Notice of Exemption Appendix E
To: Office of Planning and Research
P. O. Box 3044, Room 212
Sacramento, CA 95812- 3044
County Clerk
County of Riverside
P. O. Box 751
Riverside, CA 92502- 0751
Project Title:
From:
City of Banning
99E. Ramsey Street
P. O. Box 998
Banning, CA 92220
Ordinance No. 1553, amending Chapter 3.6 and adopting Resolution No. 2019- 13 Project Applicant: City of Banning; 99 East Ramsey Street, Banning, CA, 92220 Project Location — Specific:
All parcels; all properties; in the City of Banning
Project Location — City: City of Banning
Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project:
Project Location — County: Riverside County
City of Banning, CA
Name of Public Agency Approving Project:
Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project:
City of Banning
City of Banning
Exempt Status: ( check one)
Ministerial ( Sec. 21080( b)( 1): 15268);
Declared Emergency ( Sec. 21080( b)( 3); 15269( a));
Emergency Project ( Sec. 21080( b)( 4): 15269( b)( c))• Categorical Exemption. State type and section number:
O Statutory Exemptions. State code number:
Reasons why project is exempt:
Section' s15378( b)( 4) and 15273( a)( 1) and (2)
The project does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment or a
reasonably foreseeable indirect change in the environment.
Lead Agency City of Banning
Contact Person: Adam Rush Area Code/ Telephone/ Extension: (951) 922- 3131 If filed by applicant:
Attach certified document of exemption finding.
2. Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? ® Yes No Signature: Date: 12-0-9 Title: Community Development Director x Signed by Lead Agency
0 Signed by Applicant Date received for tiling at OPR:
Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21110, Public Resources Code.
Reference: Sections 21108, 21152, and 21152. 1, Public Resources Code.
Revised 2011
91 ORDINANCE 1553
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BANNING,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.6 (" FEE AND
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE/ COST COMPARISON") OF
TITLE 3 (" REVENUE AND FINANCE") OF THE BANNING
MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING THE CITY' S
SCHEDULE FOR FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES,
MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO CEQA, AND
REPEALING PROVISIONS OF CONFLICTING
ORDINANCES ESTABLISHING OR MODIFYING USER
FEES
The City Council of the City of Banning does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1. The City Council makes the following findings in connection with the adoption of this Ordinance:
A. The City Council of the City of Banning initiated an amendment to Chapter
3.6 ("Fee and Service Charge Revenue/ Cost Comparison") of Title 3 (" Revenue and Finance") of the Banning Municipal Code (" BMC") concerning the City' sschedule of fees and service charges.
B. BMC Chapter 3.6. 040 directs the City Manager to annually/ seasonally review fees and charges to recover the percentage of costs reasonably borne in providing the regulation products or services enumerated in Chapter 3.6 in the percentage of costs reasonably borne and on the schedule of rate review and revision as established in Section 3.6. 080 of Chapter 3.6, and recommend changes to the City Council for adoption.
C. On September 10, 2019, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider proposed amendments to BMC Chapter 3. 36, the approval of a Comprehensive User Fee Study Report prepared by Willdan Financial Services and dated January 2, 2019, and the adoption of an updated Master User Fee Schedule for the following City departments and fee groups: Finance and Administration; Animal Control; Community Services; Airport; Building; Planning; Utility Billing; Electric Utility; Police; Fire; and Engineering. Following the receipt of testimony, the City Council continued the matter off -calendar and forwarded the proposed updated Master User Fee Schedule to the Council' s Budget & Finance Committee for further review and recommendations.
D. On October 22, 2019, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider proposed amendments to BMC Chapter 3.6, the approval of a Comprehensive User Fee Study Report prepared by Willdan Financial Services and dated January 2, 2019, and the adoption of an updated Master User Fee Schedule for the following City departments and fee groups: Finance and Administration; Animal Control; Community Services; Airport; Building; Planning; Utility Billing; Electric Utility; Police; Fire; and 1 Ordinance 1553
92 Engineering. Following the receipt of testimony, and upon staff' recommendation, the City Council again forwarded the proposed updated Master User Fee Schedule to the Council' sBudget & Finance Committee for further review and recommendations.
E. On December 10, 2019, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider proposed amendments to BMC Chapter 3.6, the approval of a Comprehensive User Fee Study Report prepared by Willdan Financial Services and dated January 2, 2019, and the adoption of an updated Master User Fee Schedule for the following City departments and fee groups: Finance and Administration; Animal Control; Community Services; Airport; Building; Planning; Utility Billing; Electric Utility; Police; Fire; and Engineering. The proposed amendments to BMC Chapter 3.6 are the subject of this Ordinance.
F. In accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA), staff analyzed the proposed amendments to BMC Chapter 3. 36, the approval of a Comprehensive User Fee Study Report prepared by Willdan Financial Services and dated January 2, 2019, and the adoption of an updated Master User Fee Schedule ( collectively, the "Project"), and determined that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378( b)( 4), 15273( a)( 1), and 15273( a)( 2), the Project is not subject to CEQA because these actions ( 1) involve the creation of a government funding mechanism which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment, and ( 2) establish fees to meet operating expenses, including employee wage rates and fringe benefits, and to purchase and/ or lease supplies, equipment, and materials.
G. All other prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance, as specified by the Mitigation Fee Act ( Cal. Gov. Code, § 66000 et seq.) and other applicable laws, have been satisfied.
Section 2. The City Council makes the following California Environmental Quality Act findings in connection with the adoption of this Ordinance:
A. City staff has evaluated the potential environmental impacts of the adoption of this Ordinance, the approval of the Comprehensive User Fee Study Report prepared by Willdan Financial Services and dated January 2, 2019, and the proposed updated Master User Fee Schedule pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA"). City staff has determined that these actions do not constitute a " project" under CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15378( b)( 4) because these actions involve the creation of a government funding mechanism which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. In addition, City Staff has determined that these actions are statutorily exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15273( a)( 1) and ( a)( 2) because these actions are establishing fees to meet operating expenses, including employee wage rates and fringe benefits, and to purchase and/ or lease supplies, equipment, and materials.
2 Ordinance 1553
93 B. The City Council concurs with City staff' determination that the adoption of this Ordinance, the approval of the Comprehensive User Fee Study Report prepared by Willdan Financial Services and dated January 2, 2019, and the proposed updated Master User Fee Schedule do not constitute a project under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378( b)( 4). The City Council additionally concurs with City staff' determination that the adoption of this Ordinance, the approval of the Comprehensive User Fee Study Report prepared by Willdan Financial Services and dated January 2, 2019, and the proposed updated Master User Fee Schedule are statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15273( a)( 1) and ( a)( 2).
C. The City Council hereby directs City staff to file the Notice of Exemption, attached to this Ordinance as Exhibit A, with the County Clerk pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15062 within five ( 5) days of the date that this Ordinance is adopted.
Section 3. Section 3.6. 030 ("`Costs Reasonably Borne' Defined") of Chapter
3.6 ("Fee and Service Charge Revenue/ Cost Comparison") of Title 3 (" Revenue and Finance") of the Banning Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
3.6. 030 " Costs reasonably borne" defined.
Costs reasonably borne,' as used and ordered to be applied in this chapter are to consist of the following elements:
A. Direct Labor ( Personnel Costs): The costs related to staff salaries for time spent directly on free -related services.
B. Department Overhead: A proportional allocation of department overhead costs, including operation costs such as supplies and materials that are necessary for the department to function.
C. Central Services Overhead: These costs detailed in Appendix A to the adopted Comprehensive User Fee Study Report dated January 2, 2019, representing services provided by those central services departments whose primary function is to support other city departments."
Section 4. Section 3.6. 040 ("Delegation of Authority and Direction to City Manager") of Chapter 3.6 ("Fee and Service Charge Revenue/ Cost Comparison") of Title 3 (" Revenue and Finance") of the Banning Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
A. The city manager is directed to annually/ seasonally review fees and charges to recover the percentage of costs reasonably borne in providing the regulation products or services enumerated in this chapter.
B. `Costs reasonably borne' shall be defined in Section 3.6. 030." 3 Ordinance 1553
94 Section 5. Section 3.6. 050 ("Public Meeting") of Chapter 3.6 ("Fee and Service Charge Revenue/ Cost Comparison") of Title 3 (" Revenue and Finance") of the Banning Municipal Code is hereby deleted in its entirety.
Section 6. Section 3.6. 060 ("Provision of Data") of Chapter 3.6 ("Fee and Service Charge Revenue/ Cost Comparison") of Title 3 (" Revenue and Finance") of the Banning Municipal Code is hereby deleted in its entirety.
Section 7. Sections 3.6. 070 ("Fees for Qualifying Projects") through 3.6. 080 are hereby renumbered as Sections 3.6. 050 through 3.6. 060, respectively.
Section 8. Section 3.6. 060 ("Schedule of Fees and Service Charges") of Chapter 3.6 ("Fee and Service Charge Revenue/ Cost Comparison") of Title 3 (" Revenue and Finance") of the Banning Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
3.6. 060 Schedule of fees and service charges.
The fees and charges levied under this chapter to recover all or a percentage of costs reasonably borne necessary to provide a product or service shall be paid in the amounts established by resolution of the city council. The amount of the fees and charges may be adjusted annually for inflation on July 1st of each year by the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers ( CPI -U): Riverside -San Bernardino - Ontario ( or any successor index), as specified in the resolution that adopts the fee and charge amounts or by the periodic preparation of a new comprehensive fee study prepared and adopted pursuant to the Mitigation Fee Act ( Gov. Code, § 66000 et seq.)." Section 9. Repeal of Prior User Fees Adopted by Conflicting Ordinances. Any and all provisions of prior ordinances establishing or modifying user fees in the categories established in the Comprehensive User Fee Study Report prepared by Willdan Financial Services and dated January 2, 2019, which duplicate or conflict with the provisions of Exhibit A to Resolution 2019- 113, are hereby repealed and replaced with the fees set forth in Exhibit A to Resolution 2019- 13 and the terms and conditions established by Resolution 2019- 13 upon the effective date of the new user fees as provided for in Resolution 2019- 13.
Section 10. Publication, Effective Date. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, and shall make a minute order of the passage and adoption thereof in the records and the proceeding of the City Council at which time the same is passed and adopted. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty 30) days after its final passage and adoption, and within fifteen ( 15) calendar days after its final passage, the City Clerk shall publish, or cause a summary of this Ordinance to be published in a newspaper of general circulation and shall post the same at City Hall, 99 E. Ramsey Street, Banning, California. The City Clerk shall cause the Ordinance to be printed, published, and circulated.
4 Ordinance 1553
95 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Banning, California, this 14th day of January 2020.
Qd .? l,11017c.,, ale
Daniela Andrade, Mayor
City of Banning
ATTEST:
Sonja —De La Fuente, Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL CONTENT:
Kevin G. Ennis, City Attorney
Richards, Watson & Gershon
5 Ordinance 1553
96 CERTIFICATION:
I, Sonja De La Fuente, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance 1553 was duly introduced at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Banning, held on the 10th day of December, 2019, and was duly adopted at a
regular meeting of said City Council on the 14th day of January, 2020, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Andrade, Happe, Wallace & Welch
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Sonja De LW!'- nte, Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning, California
6 Ordinance 1553
97 Exhibit A
Notice of Exemption
98 Notice of Exemption Appendix E
To: Office of Planning and Research
P. O. Box 3044, Room 212
Sacramento, CA 95812- 3044
County Clerk
County of Riverside
P. O. Box 751
Riverside. CA 92502- 0751
Project Title:
From:
City of Banning
99E. Ramsey Street
P. O. Box 998
Banning, CA 92220
Ordinance No. 1553, amending Chapter 3.6 and adopting Resolution No. 2019- 13 Project Applicant: City of Banning; 99 East Ramsey Street, Banning, CA, 92220 Project Location — Specific:
All parcels; all properties; in the City of Banning
Project Location — City: City of Banning
Description ofNature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project:
Project Location — County: Riverside County
City of Banning, CA
Name of Public Agency Approving Project:
Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project:
City of Banning
City of Banning
Exempt Status: ( check one)
Ministerial ( Sec. 21080( b)( 1); 15268);
Declared Emergency ( Sec. 21080( b)( 3): 15269( a));
Emergency Project ( Sec. 21080( b)( 4): 15269( b)( c)); Categorical Exemption. State type and section number:
Statutory Exemptions. State code number:
Reasons why project is exempt:
Section' s15378( b)( 4) and 15273( a)( 1) and (2)
The project does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect change in the environment.
Lead Agency City of Banning
Contact Person: Adam Rush Area Code/ Telephone/ Extension: (951) 922- 3131 If filed by applicant:
1. Attach certified document of exemption finding.
2. Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No Signature: ` "" Date: 12-0-9 Tide: Community Development Director x Signed by Lead Agency
Signed by Applicant Date received for filing at OPR:
Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21110, Public Resources Code.
Revised 2011
99 CITY OF BANNING, CA
COMPREHENSIVE USER FEE
STUDY REPORT
OCTOBER 2025
100
INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
LEGAL FRAMEWORK 4
USER FEE STUDY METHODOLOGY 7
RESULTS OVERVIEW 9
BUILDING & SAFETY 10
ELECTRIC UTILITY 17
ENGINEERING 21
FILM PERMITS 29
FINANCE 30
FIRE 32
PARKS AND RECREATION 44
PLANNING 48
POLICE 53
UTILITY BILLING 55
WATER & WASTEWATER 57
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SURCHARGES 60
COST RECOVERY CONSIDERATIONS 63
APPENDIX – COMPARATIVE SURVEY 67
TABLE OF CONTENTS
101
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 1
The report, which follows, presents the results of the Cost of Services (User Fee) Study conducted by Matrix Consulting Group for the City of Banning, California.
PROJECT BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW
The City of Banning last conducted a comprehensive fee analysis in 2019. To align with best practices of conducting comprehensive updates every 5-7 years, they contracted with Matrix Consulting Group to reevaluate their fees, determining the full cost (direct and indirect) of providing a various City services.
The analysis is based upon the existing organizational structure and processes. The cost-of-service relationships that exist between fees for service activities in the following areas were evaluated through this analysis: Building and Safety, Electric Utility, Engineering, Film Permits, Finance, Fire, Parks and Recreation, Planning, Police, Utility Billing, and Water. The results of this study provide a tool for understanding current service levels and the cost for those services.
GENERAL PROJECT APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY
The methodology employed by the Matrix Consulting Group is a widely accepted “bottom up” approach to cost analysis, where time spent per unit of fee activity is determined for each position within a Department or Division. Once time spent for a fee activity is determined, all applicable City costs are then considered in the calculation of the “full” cost of providing each service. The following table provides an overview of types of costs applied in establishing the “full” cost of services provided by the City:
TABLE 1: OVERVIEW OF COST COMPONENTS
Cost Component Description
Direct Fiscal Year 2026 Budgeted salaries, benefits, and allowable expenditures.
Indirect Program, departmental, clerical, and Citywide support.
Together, the cost components in the table above comprise the calculation of the total “full” cost of providing a service, regardless of whether a fee for that service is charged.
The work accomplished by the Matrix Consulting Group in the analysis of the proposed fees for service involved the following steps:
• Department / Program Staff Interviews: The project team interviewed department / program staff regarding their needs for clarification to the structure of existing fee items or for addition of new fee items.
INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
102
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 2
• Data Collection: Data was collected for each permit / service, including time estimates. In addition, all budgeted costs and staffing levels for Fiscal Year 2025 were entered into Matrix Consulting Group’s analytical software model.
• Cost Analysis: The full cost of providing each service included in the analysis was established. • Review and Approval of Results with City Staff: Department management has reviewed and approved these documented results.
A more detailed description of user fee methodology and legal and policy considerations are provided in subsequent chapters of this report.
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
When comparing FY26 fee-related budgeted expenditures with fee-related FY24 revenue, the City is under-recovering its costs by approximately $431,000 or recovering 87% of its costs. The following table shows by major revenue source: annual revenue collected, total annual cost, the resulting difference, and cost recovery level.
TABLE 2: ANNUAL COST RECOVERY ANALYSIS
Service Area Total Revenue Total Annual Cost Difference Cost Recovery % Building $2,052,640 $2,213,392 ($160,751) 93%
Engineering $629,221 $759,774 ($130,553) 83%
Parks & Recreation $16,730 $43,116 ($26,386) 39%
Planning $243,013 $356,052 ($113,039) 68%
Total $2,941,604 $3,372,334 ($430,730) 87%
The most significant deficit, at roughly $161,000, is in relation to Building. The primary reasons for the large deficit are the New Construction and Tenant Improvement fees. At $131,000, Engineering has the next largest deficit, which is due to Public Works Encroachment Fees. Right-sizing those fees will allow the city to achieve greater cost recovery
Overall, the above table highlights the disparity between current fees charged and the actual cost of providing services. As such, the City should closely evaluate and modify fees where appropriate to help bridge the cost-recovery gap.
The detailed documentation of this study will show an over-collection for some fees (on a per unit basis) and an undercharge for most others. The results of this analysis will provide the Department and the City with guidance on how to right-size their fees to ensure that each service unit is set at an amount that does not exceed the full cost of providing that service. The display of the cost recovery figures shown in this report are meant to provide a basis for policy development discussions among Councilmembers and City staff and do not represent a recommendation for where or how the Council should act. The setting of the “rate” or “price” for services, whether at full cost recovery or lower, is a policy decision to be made only by the Council with input from City staff and the community. 103
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 3
CONSIDERATIONS FOR COST RECOVERY POLICY AND UPDATES
The Matrix Consulting Group recommends that the City use the information contained in this report to discuss, adopt, and implement a formal Cost Recovery Policy, including a mechanism for the annual update of fees for service.
ADOPT A FORMAL COST RECOVERY POLICY
The Government Finance Officers Association’s (GFOA) best practices for Establishing Government Charges and Fees states that governmental entities should adopt formal policies regarding charges and fees which include the jurisdiction’s intention to recover the full cost or partial costs of providing services, sets forth circumstances under which the jurisdiction might set a charge for fee at less than or more than 100% of full cost, and outlines the considerations that might influence the jurisdiction’s pricing decision.
The Matrix Consulting Group strongly recommends that the Council adopt a formalized, individual cost recovery policy for each service area included in this Study. Whenever a cost recovery policy is established at less than 100% of the full cost of providing services, a known gap in funding is recognized and may then potentially be recovered through other revenue sources. The Matrix Consulting Group considers a formalized cost recovery policy for various fees for service an industry Best Management Practice.
ADOPT AN ANNUAL FEE UPDATE / INCREASE MECHANISM
GFOA best practices for Establishing Government Charges and Fees states that governmental entities should review, and update charges and fees periodically based on factors such as the impact of inflation, other cost increases, adequacy of cost recovery, use of services, and the competitiveness of current rates to avoid large infrequent fee increases.
The purpose of a comprehensive update is to completely revisit the analytical structure, service level estimates and assumptions, and to account for any major shifts in cost components or organizational structures that have occurred since the City’s previous analysis. It’s recommended the City continue the practice of conducting comprehensive analyses every five to seven years as this practice captures any changes to organizational structure, processes, as well as any new service areas.
In between comprehensive updates, the City should continue to utilize published industry economic factors such as Consumer Price Index (CPI) or other regional factors to update the cost calculations established in the Study on an annual basis.
104
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 4
This section of the report is intended to provide an overview of the legal rules and regulations that govern what is considered a fee for service, how those fees can be calculated, general principles, philosophies, and general policy considerations for setting fees for service.
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
A “user fee” is a charge for service provided by a governmental agency to a public citizen or group.
California has several Government Codes and Propositions that regulate fees for service, with the purpose of ensuring that fees are reasonable and justified. The most prominent and relevant of these includes:
• Proposition 26: passed in 2010, specifically outlines the difference between a fee and a tax and dictates that fees must be directly related to a service and cannot exceed the reasonable cost of that service.
• Government Code § 50076: clarifies that fees for service costs are not special taxes and do not need voter approval.
• Government Code § 65104: gives local governments the authority to charge planning and zoning fees to recover processing costs.
When determining fees for service it is important to ensure there is a direct benefit – the service is provided directly to the payer, and that it is cost based and does not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service.
EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE
While Proposition 26 defines what constitutes a user fee, and how those fees can be determined, it also provides a key exception for fees charged for facility or property rentals. This exception outlines that fees for use of government property (e.g., renting public buildings, parks, or event spaces) are voluntary transactions. Therefore, governments can charge market-based rental fees for these services.
GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND PHILOSOPHIES REGARDING USER FEES Local governments are providers of many types of general services to their communities. While all services provided by local government are beneficial to constituents, some services can be classified as globally beneficial to all citizens, while others provide more of a direct benefit to a specific group or
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
105
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 5
individual. The following table provides examples of services provided by local government within a continuum of the degree of community benefit received:
TABLE 3: SERVICES IN RELATION TO BENEFIT RECEIVED
Funding for local government is obtained from a myriad of revenue sources such as taxes, fines, grants, special charges, user fees, etc. In recent years, alternative tax revenues, which typically offset subsidies for services provided to the community, have become increasingly limited. These limitations have caused increased attention on user fee activities as a revenue source that can offset costs otherwise subsidized by the general fund. In Table 3, services in the “global benefit” section tend to be funded primarily through voter-approved tax revenues. In the middle of the table, one typically finds a mixture of taxes, user fees, and other funding sources. Finally, in the “individual / group benefit” section of the table lie the services provided by local government that are typically funded almost entirely by user fee revenue.
The following are two central concepts regarding the establishment of user fees:
v Fees should be assessed according to the degree of individual or private benefit gained from services. For example, the processing and approval of a land use or building permit will generally result in monetary gain to the applicant, whereas Police services and Fire Suppression are examples of services that are essential to the safety of the community at large. v A profit-making objective should not be included in the assessment of user fees. In fact, California laws require that the charges for service be in direct proportion to the costs associated with providing those services. Once a charge for service is assessed at a level higher than the actual cost of providing a service, the term “user fee” no longer applies. The charge then becomes a tax subject to voter approval.
Therefore, it is commonly accepted that user fees are established at a level that will recover up to, and not more than, the cost of providing a particular service. "Global" Community Benefit
•Police
•Park Maintenance
•Fire Suppression
"Global" Benefit and an
Individual or Group Benefit
•Recreation / Community
Services
•Fire Prevention
Individual or Group Benefit
•Building Permits
•Planning and Zoning
Permits
•Site Plan Permits
•Engineering Development
Review
•Facility Rentals
106
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 6
GENERAL POLICY CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING USER FEES
Undoubtedly, there are programs, circumstances, and services that justify a subsidy from a tax-based or alternative revenue source. However, it is essential that jurisdictions prioritize the use of revenue sources for the provision of services based on the continuum of benefit received.
Within the services that are typically funded by user fees, the Matrix Consulting Group recognizes several reasons why City staff or the Council may not advocate the full cost recovery of services. The following factors are key policy considerations in setting fees at less than 100 percent of cost recovery:
• Limitations posed by an external agency. The State or an outside agency will occasionally set a maximum, minimum, or limit on the jurisdiction’s ability to charge a fee. Examples includes time spent copying and retrieving public documents and / or transportation permits. • Encouragement of desired behaviors. Keeping fees for certain services below full cost recovery may provide better compliance from the community. For example, if the cost of a permit for changing a water heater in residential home is higher than the cost of the water heater itself, many citizens will avoid pulling the permit.
• Benefit received by user of the service and the community at large is mutual. Many services that directly benefit a group or individual also equally benefit the community. Examples include Planning Design Review, historical dedications, and certain types of special events.
The Matrix Consulting Group recognizes the need for policies that intentionally subsidize certain activities. The primary goals of a User Fee Study are to provide a fair and equitable basis for determining the costs of providing services and ensure that the City complies with State law.
SUMMARY OF LEGAL RESTRICTIONS AND POLICY CONSIDERATIONS Once the full cost of providing services is known, the next step is to determine the “rate” or “price” for services at a level which is up to, and not more than, the full cost amount. The Council is responsible for this decision, which often becomes a question of balancing service levels and funding sources. The placement of a service or activity within the continuum of benefit received may require extensive discussion and at times fall into a “grey area.” However, with the resulting cost of services information from a User Fee Study, the Council can be assured that the adopted fee for service is reasonable, fair, and legal. The City will need to review all fees for service in this analysis. Where subsidies are identified, the City should increase the fees to reduce the deficit; where over-recoveries are identified, the fee must be reduced to comply with the law.
107
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 7
The Matrix Consulting Group utilizes a cost allocation methodology commonly known and accepted as the “bottom-up” approach to establishing User Fees. The term means that several cost components are calculated for each fee or service. These components then build upon each other to comprise the total cost for providing the service. The following chart describes the components of a full cost calculation:
The following subsections discuss the two components of the basis of the full cost.
TIME ESTIMATION
Utilization of time estimates is a reasonable and defensible approach, especially since experienced staff members who understand service levels and processes unique to the City developed these estimates.
The project team worked closely with City staff in developing time estimates with the following criteria:
• Estimates are representative of average times for providing services. Extremely difficult or abnormally simple projects are not factored in the analysis.
• Estimates reflect the time associated with the position or positions that typically perform a service. • Estimates are reviewed by the project team for “reasonableness” against their experience with other agencies.
• Estimates were not based on time in motion studies, as they are not practical for the scope of services and time frame for this project.
• Estimates match the current or proposed staffing levels to ensure there is no over-allocation of staff resources to fee and non-fee related activities.
The Matrix Consulting Group agrees that while the use of time estimates is not perfect, it is the best alternative available for setting a standard level of service on which to base a jurisdiction’s fees for service and meets the requirements of California law.
The alternative to time estimating is actual time tracking, often referred to billing on a “time and materials” basis. Except in the case of anomalous or very large and complex projects, Matrix Consulting Group believes this approach to not be cost effective or reasonable for the following reasons:
TIME ASSUMPTION
(by position)
FULLY BURDENED
HOURLY RATE Total Cost
USER FEE STUDY METHODOLOGY
108
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 8
• Accuracy in time tracking is compromised by the additional administrative burden required to track, bill, and collect for services in this manner.
• Additional costs are associated with administrative staff’s billing, refunding, and monitoring deposit accounts.
• Customers often prefer to know the fees for services in advance of applying for permits or participating in programs.
• Departments can better predict revenue streams and staff needs using standardized time estimates and anticipated permit volumes. Situations arise where the size and complexity of a given project warrants time tracking and billing on a “time and materials” basis. The Matrix Consulting Group has recommended taking a deposit and charging Actual Costs for such fees as appropriate and itemized within the current fee schedule.
FULLY BURDENED HOURLY RATES
The fully burdened hourly rates calculated through this study include the following components:
• Salaries: FY25-26 Budgeted salaries were utilized and consolidated at the positional level. • Benefits: FY25-26 Budgeted benefits were utilized and consolidated at the positional level. • Productive Hours: Based on Banning’s current personnel system rules, working or productive hours were calculated. This means taking the starting total working hours and reducing the hours by vacation, sick, holidays, trainings, and administrative leave based on each bargaining unit • Departmental / Divisional Overhead: This captures any internal service charges or operating supply costs such as vehicles, supplies, etc. Additionally, this component includes the cost associated with support from the Director, Administrative and Analytical staff who do not directly work on fees. • Citywide Overhead: This captures support provided by City Council, City Manager, City Clerk, City Attorney, Finance, and Human Resources. The costs are based on the City’s indirect cost allocation plan (provided by Finance staff).
Together these components result in the generation of fully burdened hourly rates by position / classification and / or department / division. These rates were multiplied against the time assumptions to calculate the full cost of services noted in this report. 109
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 9
The motivation behind a cost of services (User Fee) analysis is for the City Council and Departmental staff to maintain services at a level that is both accepted and effective for the community and also to maintain control over the policy and management of these services.
It should be noted that the results presented in this report are not a precise measurement. In general, a cost-of-service analysis takes a “snapshot in time,” where a fiscal year of financial and operational information is utilized. Changes to the structure of fee names, along with the use of time estimates, allow only for a reasonable projection of subsidies and revenue. Consequently, the Council and Department staff should rely conservatively upon these estimates to gauge the impact of implementation going forward.
Discussion of results in the following chapters is intended as a summary of extensive and voluminous cost allocation documentation produced during the Study. Each chapter will include detailed cost calculation results for each major fee category including the following:
• Modifications: discussions regarding any proposed revisions to the current fee schedule, including elimination or addition of fees.
• “Per Unit” Results: comparison of the full cost of providing each unit of service to the current fee for each unit of service (where applicable).
• Annualized Results: utilizing volume of activity estimates, annual subsidies, and revenue impacts were projected where workload was available.
The full analytical results were provided to City staff under separate cover from this summary report.
RESULTS OVERVIEW
110
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 10
The Building & Safety Division is responsible for reviewing and issuing permits associated with new and existing structures according to established construction standards. The fees examined within this study relate to the plan check and inspection for a variety of commercial and residential projects. The following subsections discuss fee schedule modifications, detailed per unit results, and annual revenue impacts for the fee-related services provided by Building & Safety.
FEE SCHEDULE MODIFICATIONS
In discussions with City staff, the following modifications were proposed to the current fee schedule:
• Eliminated Fees: Staff proposed removing the following fees as they are rarely requested, covered under other fees, or represent services no longer offered by the City:
- ‘Awning / Canopy (Supported by Building)’
- ‘Certificate of Occupancy (Enhanced)’
- ‘Patio Cover – Wood, ICC, IAPMO, or Handout’
- ‘Temporary electrical service’
- ‘Wall – Combo’
- ‘Wall – Freestanding’
- ‘Wall – Pilaster’
• New Fees: Staff proposed the addition of the following fees as they highlight either services already offered but not codified on the fee schedule or new services the City would like to provide:
- ‘Administrative Services for Applications Not Listed’ - ‘Administrative Charge for Consultant Services’
• Condensed Fees: For simplicity, staff proposed condensing All sub-tiers of the ‘Pool/Spa – Residential’ fee (‘Custom,’ ‘Fiberglass/Vinyl-Lined,’ and ‘Gunnite’) were condensed into one singular Residential fee.
The modifications proposed ensure that the proposed fee schedule better reflects the services being provided by Building & Safety staff.
BUILDING & SAFETY
111
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 11
DETAILED RESULTS
The Building and Safety Services Division collects flat fees for balconies and decks, carports, fireplace, patios, pools and spas, and other straightforward review, as well as for Mechanical, Plumbing, and Electrical Permits. It also collects fees for new construction based on the square footage and project type. The total cost calculated for each service includes direct staff costs and Departmental, Divisional, and Citywide overhead. The following table details the fee name, current fee, total cost, and difference associated with each service offered.
TABLE 4: TOTAL COST PER UNIT RESULTS – BUILDING
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Flat Fees
Administrative Services for Applications Not Listed New $174 N/A Administrative Charge for Consultant Services 10% 15% (5%) Air handling / heating or cooling unit replacement $193 $254 ($62) Balcony / deck:
Balcony / deck $491 $567 ($76)
Railing repair $297 $567 ($270)
Carport:
Custom $944 $1,117 ($173)
ICC, IAPMO, handout $491 $659 ($168)
Cell Tower:
Modifications $401 $1,117 ($716)
New $1,418 $1,876 ($458)
Change of occupancy $417 $2,680 ($2,263)
Demolition of building $408 $904 ($496)
Electric panel replacement $193 $283 ($91)
Exterior wall covering replacement (up to 400 s.f.) $422 $458 ($36) Fireplace:
Custom $583 $744 ($161)
Pre‐fabricated with engineering $548 $744 ($196)
Flagpole (over 20' in height) $645 $473 $172
Grease trap/ interceptor $330 $602 ($272)
Hood:
Other than Type 1 (including ducts) $492 $602 ($110)
Type 1 (includes exhaust system) $629 $995 ($366)
Inspections:
Inspection Fee $183 $196 ($13)
Re‐Inspection $183 $196 ($13)
Job card ‐ replace / duplicate $55 $87 ($32)
Lighting pole:
Up to 6 poles $783 $853 ($70)
6+ Poles Additional $173 $144 $29
Manufactured home ‐ installation on private property $538 $1,109 ($571) Modular unit ‐ installation on private property $659 $1,109 ($450) Patio:
Patio cover
112
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 12
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Patio cover ‐ custom $515 $930 ($415)
Patio cover ‐ handout $256 $659 ($403)
Patio enclosure $561 $930 ($369)
Plan check:
Plan check $162 $183 ($21)
Plan check ‐ Structural Engineer $292 $274 $18
Additional plan review $162 $183 ($21)
Additional plan review ‐ Engineering $292 $183 $109
Pool/Spa
Commercial $1,192 $2,453 ($1,261)
Residential Modified $853 N/A
Research $110 $174 ($64)
Remodels
Residential bathroom remodel ‐ no structural/wall changes $411 $617 ($206) Residential kitchen remodel ‐ no structural/wall changes $434 $617 ($183) Re-roof
Commercial $330 $400 ($70)
Multifamily $330 $382 ($52)
SFD $330 $333 ($3)
Retrofit foundation for a modular or mobile unit $216 $1,109 ($893) Sales office ‐ conversion to residential or garage use $216 $1,064 ($848) Septic tank $353 $1,070 ($717)
Sign:
Monument $677 $982 ($305)
Pole/ billboard $869 $1,656 ($787)
Wall $279 $467 ($188)
Site investigation $445 $451 ($6)
Solar:
Commercial
Up to 4 kw $383 $1,307 ($924)
Each additional kw $198 $74 $124
Ground mount $791 $1,124 ($333)
Residential
Rooftop (up to 10 kw) $423 $554 ($131)
Rooftop (more than 10 kw) $596 $698 ($102)
Residential water heater $403 $322 $81
Special Inspector application $55 $174 ($119)
Stairs $354 $187 $167
Storage racks $260 $277 ($17)
Temporary construction or sales trailer $248 $1,109 ($862) Utility release $193 $205 ($13)
Walk‐in tub $330 $185 $145
Wall:
Screen / Freestanding:
Custom $537 $1,261 ($724)
Handout $537 $668 ($131)
Retaining
113
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 13
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Custom $894 $1,032 ($138)
Handout $445 $668 ($223)
Water heater replacement $216 $234 ($18)
Water/gas piping ‐ installation, alteration or repair $476 $475 $1 Window/door replacement ‐ residential, no changes to framing $411 $425 ($14) Trade Fees
Electrical $267 $299 ($32)
Plumbing $267 $299 ($32)
Mechanical $267 $299 ($32)
Fees Based on ICC Class, Occupancy, Square Footage, Valuation: Plan Check / Inspection / Permit combined Commercial - New
1,001 - 5,000 SF $2,925 $2,957 ($32)
Each Addl 100 SF $26.92 $33.87 ($6.95)
5,001 - 10,000 SF $4,002 $4,312 ($310)
Each Addl 100 SF $30.89 $56.50 ($25.61)
10,001 - 20,000 SF $5,546 $7,137 ($1,591)
Each Addl 100 SF $20.99 $45.03 ($24.04)
20,001 - 50,000 SF $7,645 $11,640 ($3,995)
Each Addl 100 SF $9.10 $24.88 ($15.78)
50,001 - 100,000 SF $10,375 $19,105 ($8,731)
Each Addl 100 SF $6.26 $19.10 ($12.84)
100,001+ SF $13,507 $28,656 ($15,149)
Each Addl 100 SF $8.37 $9.55 ($1.18)
Tenant Improvements
1 - 800 SF $1,892 $1,912 ($20)
Each Addl 100 SF $47.58 $59.49 ($11.91)
801 - 1,250 SF $2,273 $2,388 ($115)
Each Addl 100 SF $89.42 $427.28 ($337.86)
1,251 - 2,500 SF $2,675 $4,311 ($1,636)
Each Addl 100 SF $54.81 $226.04 ($171.23)
2,501 - 5,000 SF $3,360 $7,137 ($3,776)
Each Addl 100 SF $26.97 $80.78 ($53.81)
5,001 - 12,500 SF $4,035 $9,156 ($5,121)
Each Addl 100 SF $9.43 $31.03 ($21.60)
12,501+ SF $4,742 $11,483 ($6,742)
Each Addl 100 SF $12.72 $15.52 ($2.80)
Industrial - New
1,001 - 5,000 SF $2,632 $2,890 ($258)
Each Addl 100 SF $17.67 $34.69 ($17.02)
5,001 - 10,000 SF $3,339 $4,277 ($939)
Each Addl 100 SF $20.01 $42.87 ($22.86)
10,001 -20,000 SF $4,339 $6,421 ($2,082)
Each Addl 100 SF $13.05 $59.29 ($46.24)
20,001 50,000 SF $5,644 $12,350 ($6,706)
Each Addl 100 SF $4.28 $23.56 ($19.28)
50,001 100,000 SF $6,927 $19,417 ($12,489)
114
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 14
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Each Addl 100 SF $4.26 $11.85 ($7.59)
100,001+ SF $9,059 $25,339 ($16,281)
Each Addl 100 SF $5.52 $5.92 ($0.40)
Residential- New (single or multifamily- per dwelling unit) 1 - 800 SF $2,512 $2,520 ($8)
Each Addl 100 SF $24.47 $34.76 ($10.29)
801 - 1,200 SF $2,708 $2,798 ($90)
Each Addl 100 SF $67.97 $210.88 ($142.91)
1,201 - 2,000 SF $2,980 $3,642 ($662)
Each Addl 100 SF $43.50 $117.35 ($73.85)
2,001 - 3,000SF $3,328 $4,580 ($1,253)
Each Addl 100 SF $44.59 $207.76 ($163.17)
3,001 - 4,000 SF $3,774 $6,658 ($2,884)
Each Addl 100 SF $63.08 $147.38 ($84.30)
4,001 6,000 SF $4,404 $8,132 ($3,727)
Each Addl 100 SF $41.33 $116.38 ($75.05)
6,001 - 10,000 SF $5,231 $10,459 ($5,229)
Each Addl 100 SF $23.11 $58.80 ($35.69)
10,001+ SF $6,155 $12,812 ($6,656)
Each Addl 100 SF $31.19 $29.40 $1.79
Residential- Production Phase
1 - 800 SF $2,212 $2,223 ($11)
Each Addl 100 SF $28.00 $30.86 ($2.86)
801 -1,200 SF $2,436 $2,470 ($34)
Each Addl 100 SF $7.61 $32.10 ($24.49)
1,201 - 2,000 SF $2,466 $2,598 ($132)
Each Addl 100 SF $60.36 $48.88 $11.48
2,001 - 3,000 SF $2,949 $2,989 ($40)
Each Addl 100 SF $27.19 $49.38 ($22.19)
3,001 - 4,000 SF $3,221 $3,483 ($262)
Each Addl 100 SF $53.72 $52.98 $0.74
4,001 - 6,000 SF $3,758 $4,013 ($255)
Each Addl 100 SF $39.26 $25.66 $13.60
6,001 - 10,000 SF $4,544 $4,526 $17
Each Addl 100 SF $19.25 $16.42 $2.83
10,001+ SF $5,314 $5,183 $131
Each Addl 100 SF $1.27 $5.24 ($3.97)
Residential- Addition (single or multifamily)
1 - 300 SF $1,740 $1,745 ($5)
Each Addl 100 SF $43.50 $92.44 ($48.94)
301 - 500 SF $1,871 $2,022 ($151)
Each Addl 100 SF $184.88 $329.77 ($144.89)
501 - 800 SF $2,240 $2,681 ($441)
Each Addl 100 SF $101.50 $250.38 ($148.88)
801 -1,500 SF $2,545 $3,433 ($888)
Each Addl 100 SF $63.70 $110.39 ($46.69)
115
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 15
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
1,501 - 2,000 SF $2,991 $4,205 ($1,215)
Each Addl 100 SF $91.35 $189.53 ($98.18)
2,001+ SF $3,447 $5,153 ($1,706)
Each Addl 100 SF $122.82 $94.77 $28.05
Residential- Remodel (single or multifamily)
1 - 300 SF $1,327 $1,351 ($25)
Each Addl 100 SF $18.13 $46.22 ($28.09)
301 -500 SF $1,381 $1,490 ($109)
Each Addl 100 SF $119.63 $160.93 ($41.30)
501 - 800 SF $1,620 $1,812 ($192)
Each Addl 100 SF $39.88 $188.48 ($148.60)
801 1- 1,500 SF $1,740 $2,377 ($637)
Each Addl 100 SF $38.84 $80.18 ($41.34)
1,501 - 2,000 SF $2,012 $2,939 ($927)
Each Addl 100 SF $21.67 $169.38 ($147.71)
2,001+ SF $2,153 $3,786 ($1,632)
Each Addl 100 SF $31.08 $33.88 ($2.80)
Shell Buildings
1 - 1,000 SF $2,708 $2,750 ($42)
Each Addl 100 SF $30.45 $65.58 ($35.13)
1,001 - 5,000 SF $3,012 $3,405 ($393)
Each Addl 100 SF $11.15 $43.64 ($32.49)
5,001 - 10,000 SF $3,458 $5,151 ($1,693)
Each Addl 100 SF $15.23 $44.70 ($29.47)
10,001 - 20,000 SF $4,220 $7,386 ($3,167)
Each Addl 100 SF $7.29 $28.73 ($21.44)
20,001 - 50,000 SF $4,948 $10,259 ($5,311)
Each Addl 100 SF $3.19 $10.19 ($7.00)
50,001+ SF $5,905 $13,315 ($7,410)
Each Addl 100 SF $4.23 $5.09 ($0.86)
Garage/ Storage/ Workshop U Occ Res/Comm
1 - 400 SF $1,055 $1,105 ($50)
Each Addl 100 SF $24.47 $58.40 ($33.93)
401 - 600 SF $1,153 $1,338 ($185)
Each Addl 100 SF $59.81 $165.92 ($106.11)
601 - 1,000 SF $1,272 $1,670 ($398)
Each Addl 100 SF $32.63 $130.43 ($97.80)
1,001 - 1,500 SF $1,403 $2,192 ($789)
Each Addl 100 SF $28.28 $96.93 ($68.65)
1,501 - 2,000 SF $1,544 $2,676 ($1,132)
Each Addl 100 SF $63.77 $75.94 ($12.17)
2,001+ SF $1,620 $3,056 ($1,436)
Each Addl 100 SF $84.57 $37.97 $46.60
The fees administered by the Building Division show a mix of under- and over-recoveries; most fees under-recover. The fee with the largest under-recovery is the ‘Fees Based on ICC Class, Occupancy, 116
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 16
Square Footage, Valuation: Plan Check / Inspection / Permit combined - Industrial – New - 100,001+ SF’ at around $16,300. The smallest undercharge is in relation to the ‘Fees Based on ICC Class, Occupancy, Square Footage, Valuation: Plan Check / Inspection / Permit combined - Industrial – New - 100,001+ SF - Each Addl 100 SF’ at $0.40. The largest overcharges are in relation to the ‘Flagpole (over 20' in height)’ at about $173. The smallest over-recovery is for a ‘Fees Based on ICC Class, Occupancy, Square Footage, Valuation: Plan Check / Inspection / Permit combined - Residential- Production Phase - 3,001 - 4,000 SF - Each Addl 100 SF’ ($0.74).
ANNUAL REVENUE IMPACT
Based on the prior year’s (FY23/24) workload information, Building has a deficit of roughly $161,000. The following table shows the revenue at current fee, total projected annual cost, and the resulting difference by major fee category.
TABLE 5: ANNUAL RESULTS – BUILDING
Fee Category Revenue at Current Fee Annual Cost Difference Flat Fees $185,280 $269,061 ($83,781)
Trade Fees $114,397 $128,271 ($13,874)
Commercial - New $69,274 $72,693 ($3,420)
Tenant Improvements $27,275 $28,659 ($1,384)
Industrial - New $13,159 $14,449 ($1,290)
Residential- New $10,440 $10,636 ($196)
Residential- Production Phase $1,560,280 $1,610,847 ($50,568) Residential- Addition (single or multifamily) $29,254 $32,239 ($2,985) Residential- Remodel (single or multifamily) $43,283 $46,536 ($3,254) Total $2,052,640 $2,213,392 ($160,752)
Building has an annual cost recovery of roughly 93%. At roughly $85,000, the largest deficit is in relation to the Flat Fees. Roughly $23,000 of the subsidy is associated with ‘Patio cover ‐ custom’ and roughly $24,000 of the subsidy is associated with ‘Patio enclosure’. For the ‘Patio cover – custom’ a per-unit deficit of about $415 processed 56 times, and the ‘Patio enclosure’ has a per-unit deficit of about $369 processed 65 times leading to this very large deficit. There is also a large deficit due to the ResidentialProduction Phase Fees specifically the ‘1,201 - 2,000 SF’ of roughly $51,000. A per-unit deficit of about $132 processed 300 times also leads to this very large deficit. The Division should review these fees and make adjustments where appropriate to allow for increased cost recovery. 117
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 17
The Electric Utility Division, within the Public Works Department, is responsible for the operation and maintenance of the City's electrical infrastructure to ensure the provision of safe and reliable electrical service to community members. The fees examined within this study relate to panel upgrades, new electric service connections for single and three-phase power, distribution and service line extensions, and engineering review and plan checks. The following subsections discuss fee schedule modifications and detailed per unit results for the fee-related services provided by the Electric Utility Division.
FEE SCHEDULE MODIFICATIONS
In discussions with City staff, the following modifications were proposed to the current fee schedule:
• New Fees: Staff proposed the addition of the following fees as they highlight either services already offered but not codified on the fee schedule or new services the City would like to provide:
- ‘Plan Check’
- ‘Distribution Line Disconnection’
- ‘Distribution Line Reconnection’
- ‘Site / Panel Investigation’
• Expanded Fees: The following fees were expanded to better capture the staff time required for the associated activities:
- ‘Panel Upgrade’
- ‘New Electric Service’
- ‘Service Line Extensions’
- ‘Additional Plan Check (After 2nd Review)’
- ‘Solar Application Review and Plan Check’
- ‘Additional Solar Plan Check (After 2nd Review)’
- ‘Service Line Disconnection’
- ‘Service Line Reconnection’
- ‘Meter Test – 2nd Request within One Year’
- ‘Service Turn On’
ELECTRIC UTILITY
118
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 18
• Modified Fees: The following points highlight various miscellaneous modifications proposed by staff:
- The fee for ‘Distribution Line Extension/Relocation’ was modified to include categories for ‘1 to 10 Units’ and ‘10+ Units’ for both Planning and Engineering Reviews, as well as categories for ‘OH to UG Conversion’.
These modifications ensure that the proposed fee schedule more accurately reflects the services that the Electric Utility provides.
DETAILED RESULTS
The Electric Utility collects fees for panel upgrades, new electric service, temporary electric service, line extensions, plan check and inspection, disconnection and reconnections, and meter services. The total cost calculated for each service includes direct staff costs and Departmental, Divisional, and Citywide overhead. The following table details the fee name, current fee, total cost, and difference associated with each service offered.
TABLE 6: TOTAL COST PER UNIT RESULTS – ELECTRIC UTILITY Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Panel Upgrade
Single Phase Panel Upgrade up to 225A (120V/240V) - OH Variable $2,336 N/A Single Phase Panel Upgrade up to 225A (120V/240V) - UG Variable $2,336 N/A Single Phase Panel Upgrade up to 225A (120V/208V) - OH Variable $2,336 N/A Single Phase Panel Upgrade up to 225A (120V/208V) - UG Variable $2,336 N/A Single Phase Panel Upgrade 225A to 400A (120V/240V) - OH Variable $2,449 N/A Single Phase Panel Upgrade 225A to 400A (120V/240V) - UG Variable $2,449 N/A Single Phase Panel Upgrade 225A to 400A (120V/208V) - OH Variable $2,449 N/A Single Phase Panel Upgrade 225A to 400A (120V/208V) - UG Variable $2,449 N/A New Electric Service
Single Phase:
Single Phase Electric Service up to 225A (120V/240V) - OH T&M $2,336 N/A Single Phase Electric Service up to 225A (120V/240V) - UG T&M $2,336 N/A Single Phase Electric Service up to 225A (120V/208V) - OH T&M $2,573 N/A Single Phase Electric Service up to 225A (120V/208V) - UG T&M $2,573 N/A Single Phase Electric Service 225A to 400A (120V/240V) - OH T&M $2,449 N/A Single Phase Electric Service 225A to 400A (120V/240V) - UG T&M $2,449 N/A Single Phase Electric Service 225A to 400A (120V/208V) - OH T&M $2,573 N/A Single Phase Electric Service 225A to 400A (120V/208V) - UG T&M $2,573 N/A Three Phase:
Three Phase Electric Service 0A to 400A (120V/208V) - OH T&M $3,796 N/A Three Phase Electric Service 0A to 400A (120V/208V) - UG T&M $3,796 N/A Three Phase Electric Service 0A to 400A (277V/480V) - OH T&M $3,796 N/A Three Phase Electric Service 0A to 400A (277V/480V) - UG T&M $3,796 N/A Three Phase Electric Service 400A to 800A (277V/480V) - OH T&M $3,796 N/A Three Phase Electric Service 400A to 800A (277V/480V) - UG T&M $3,796 N/A Three Phase Electric Service 800A to 4000A (277V/480V) - OH T&M $4,272 N/A 119
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 19
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Three Phase Electric Service 800A to 4000A (277V/480V) - UG T&M $4,272 N/A Temporary Electrical Service (Construction Purposes ONLY) Single Phase Temporary Electric Service up to 225A (120V/240V) - OH T&M $1,484 N/A
Single Phase Temporary Electric Service up to 225A (120V/240V) - UG T&M $1,484 N/A
Distribution Line Extensions
Distribution Line Extension/Relocation (1 to 10 Units) - OH Modified $2,987 N/A Distribution Line Extension/Relocation (1 to 10 Units) - UG (Rule 15) Modified $2,987 N/A Distribution Line Extension/Relocation (10+ Units) - OH Modified $5,975 N/A Distribution Line Extension/Relocation (10+ Units) - UG (Rule 15) Modified $5,975 N/A Distribution Line Extension/Relocation OH to UG Conversion (Rule 20) Modified $6,473 N/A
Service Line Extensions
Service Line Extension/Relocation (1 to 10 Units) - OH $1,700 $1,445 $255 Service Line Extension/Relocation (1 to 10 Units) - UG (Rule 16) $1,700 $1,445 $255 Service Line Extension/Relocation (10+ Units) - OH T&M $2,987 N/A Service Line Extension/Relocation (10+ Units) - UG (Rule 16) T&M $2,987 N/A Service Line Extension/Relocation OH to UG Conversion (Rule 20) T&M $3,686 N/A Engineering Review / Plan Check
Preliminary Electric Service Assessment $238 $1,395 ($1,157) Plan Check:
Basic/Minor New $1,271 N/A
Advanced/Major New $3,714 N/A
Master Subdivision/Subdivision New $2,318 N/A
Additional Plan Check (After 2nd Review):
Basic/Minor $119 $461 ($342)
Advanced/Major $119 $1,383 ($1,264)
Master Subdivision/Subdivision $119 $922 ($803)
Solar Application Review and Plan Check:
Basic/Minor $136 $1,897 ($1,761)
Advanced/Major $136 $2,647 ($2,511)
Master Subdivision/Subdivision $136 $3,236 ($3,100)
Additional Solar Plan Check (After 2nd Review):
Basic/Minor $61 $666 ($605)
Advanced/Major $61 $881 ($820)
Master Subdivision/Subdivision $61 $1,030 ($969)
Distribution Line Extension/Relocation:
1 to 10 Units - Planning T&M $1,398 N/A
1 to 10 Units - Engineering T&M $698 N/A
10+ Units - Planning T&M $2,796 N/A
10+ Units - Engineering T&M $1,397 N/A
OH to UG Conversion - Planning T&M $2,796 N/A
OH to UG Conversion - Engineering T&M $1,895 N/A
Misc Electric Utility / Penalty Fees
Customer Requested Electric Operations Service Call "Trip Charge" $125 $170 ($45) Service Line Disconnection:
Overhead $559 $675 ($116)
120
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 20
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Underground $559 $675 ($116)
Service Line Reconnection:
Overhead $262 $675 ($413)
Underground $262 $675 ($413)
Distribution Line Disconnection:
Overhead New $1,033 N/A
Underground New $1,033 N/A
Distribution Line Reconnection:
Overhead New $1,271 N/A
Underground New $1,271 N/A
Service Turn On:
Single Phase/Commercial Self Cont Remote Modified $39 N/A Single Phase/Commercial Self Cont in the Field Modified $197 N/A 3 Phase Self Cont Modified $295 N/A
Single Phase & 3 Phase CT Rated Modified $295 N/A
Site / Panel Investigation New $676 N/A
Meter Test - 2nd Request within One Year:
Single Phase $182 $367 ($185)
3 Phase $182 $709 ($527)
Meter Changeout - Customer Required:
Single Phase $307 $341 ($34)
3 Phase $596 $625 ($29)
Trespass / Diversion:
1st Offense $250 $1,399 ($1,149)
2nd Offense $350 $1,399 ($1,049)
Inspections
General $153 $676 ($523)
Trench / Conduit $153 $795 ($642)
Mandrel $153 $795 ($642)
Substructure $153 $795 ($642)
Structure / Equipment $153 $795 ($642)
Solar:
Single Phase $153 $849 ($696)
3 Phase $153 $1,077 ($924)
The fees administered by the Electric Utility Division generally under-recover their associated costs. The largest under-recovery is for ‘Solar Application Review and Plan Check - Master Subdivision/Subdivision’ at $3,100. The smallest undercharge is for the ‘Meter Changeout – Customer Requested – 3 Phase’ at about $30. The Electric Utility Division does overcharge for two fees ‘Service Line Extension/Relocation (1 to 10 Units) – OH’ and ‘Service Line Extension/Relocation (1 to 10 Units) - UG (Rule 16)’ with an over recovery of $255.
ANNUAL REVENUE IMPACT
Due to the current fees being on time and material, it is difficult to estimate the annual workload associated with these activities; as such, no annual revenue impact was calculated. 121
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 21
The Engineering Division, within the Public Works Department, is responsible for planning, designing, and administering all contracts related to land development, City streets and traffic, facilities, stormwater and landscape maintenance, and capital projects. The fees examined within this study relate to encroachment, stormwater, and excavation permits; preliminary and final plan and map reviews; grading; inspections; and other miscellaneous fees. The following subsections discuss fee schedule modifications, detailed per unit results, and annual results for the fee-related services provided by the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department.
FEE SCHEDULE MODIFICATIONS
In discussions with City staff, the following modifications were proposed to the current fee schedule:
• Eliminated Fees: Staff proposed removing the following fees, as they are no longer being charged or are duplicative of other services on the fee schedule:
- ‘Tentative map ‐ (MH, RV) ‐ preliminary’
- ‘Tentative Comm/Indus parcel >4 lots‐ preliminary’
- ‘Plot Plan’
- ‘Third checkup ‐ Final’
- ‘P.C. Final Map’
- ‘Individual Project’
- ‘24" x 36" or Smaller Printout’
- ‘Special Landscape Maintenance District ‐ Annexation’ - ‘Assessment/Mello Roos District Deposit’
- ‘Water Utility Items’
- ‘Sewer Utility Items’
• New Fees: Staff proposed the addition of the following fees as they highlight either services already offered but not codified on the fee schedule or new services the City would like to provide:
- ‘Traffic Study Screening Memo’
- ‘Traffic Study Scoping Agreement’
- ‘Preliminary Grading Plan’
ENGINEERING
122
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 22
- ‘Utility Site Plan’
- ‘Water Supply Verification / Assessment (WSA)’
- ‘Sewer Availability Verification / Assessment’
- ‘Reclaimed Water Verification / Assessment’
- ‘Sewer Waste Survey’
- ‘Conceptual Landscape Plan Review’
- ‘Fourth or Subsequent Review’
- ‘Erosion Control (If Separate from Grading Plan)’
- ‘Plan Revisions’
- ‘Other Improvement Plans: As Directed by City Engineer’ - ‘Excavation Permit’
- ‘Demolition’
- ‘NPDES Inspection / Reinspection (Stormwater Compliance)’ - ‘Special District Annexation’
- ‘Fee for Services Not Specified Above’
• Condensed Fees: Staff proposed condensing the following fees for simplicity and clarity:
- ‘Final Map’ was condensed to a base fee and a per lot fee. - ‘Precise Grading’ was condensed to a base fee and a per sheet fee. - ‘Improvement Plan Review (Street, Signing and Striping, Traffic Signal, Traffic Control, Storm Drain, Channel, Sewer, Water, Non-Potable Water, Landscape)’ was reworded and condensed to a base fee and a per sheet fee.
• Expanded Fees: The following fees were expanded to better capture the staff time required for the associated activities:
- ‘Drainage Study (Preliminary and Final)’ and ‘Wate Quality Management Plan (Preliminary and Final’ were both reworded and expanded into the following categories: ‘Under 10 Acres’, ’10 Acres or Greater’, ‘Revisions’, and ‘4th Review (Or Additional)’. - ‘Tentative Parcel Map’ and ‘Tentative Tract Map’ were expanded into the following categories:
‘Base’, ‘Per Sheet’, and ‘4th Review (Or Additional)’.
123
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 23
- ‘Site Plan’ was expanded to include ‘Residential’, ‘Multi-Family and Other Non-Residential’, and ‘4th Review (Or Additional)’.
- Under ‘Public Right of Way Items’, ‘Oversized/weight permit (Caltrans Rate)’ was expanded to include an annual fee and fees for ‘Dumpster / POD in Public ROW’ and ‘Street Closure’ were added.
• Modified Fees: The following points highlight various miscellaneous modifications proposed by staff:
- The fee for ‘Specific Plan ‐ Preliminary / Final’ was modified to read ‘Specific Plan’ for clarity. - The fee for ‘Specific Plan Amendment ‐ Preliminary / Final’ was modified to read ‘Specific Plan Amendment’ for clarity.
- The fee for ‘E.I.R ‐ Preliminary / Final’ was modified to read ‘E.I.R’ for clarity. - The fee for ‘Traffic Study Impact Assessment’ was modified to read ‘Traffic Impact Analysis’ for clarity, and it was changed to a deposit rather than a flat fee. - The fee for ‘Floodplain Evaluation Zone Development’ was modified to read ‘Flood Zone Development Review’ for clarity. It was also changed from a deposit to a flat fee. - The fee for ‘Consultant Service ‐ Preliminary / Final’ was modified to read ‘Consultant Service’ for clarity.
- The fee for ‘Amend Map – Final’ was modified to read ‘Amended Final Map’ for clarity. The unit was also changed to ‘Per Sheet’.
- The fee for ‘Condominium ‐ Preliminary’ was modified to read ‘Condominium Plan’ for clarity. - ‘Dedication Document (ROW or Easement)’ was reworded for clarity. - The fee for ‘Street / Easement Abandonment’ was modified to read ‘Street Vacation’ for clarity.
- The fee for ‘Consultant Service ‐ Final’ was modified to read ‘Consultant Service’ for clarity. - ‘Rough Grading’ was modified to a ‘Grading’ fee with a base fee and a per sheet fee. - ‘Grading / Stockpile Permit:’ was reworded to a ‘Grading Permit’ for clarity. The ‘For Every 100 CY or Fraction Thereof’ fee was also increased to larger units (1,000 CY, 10,000 CY, and 100,000 CY) to allow costs to be captured more accurately. - ‘NPDES Inspection / Reinspection – City Staff’ was renamed ‘NPDES Inspection / Reinspection (Grading)’ and the unit was changed from ‘Per Lot’ to ‘Per Acre’. - ‘Reimbursement Agreement’ was modified from a deposit fee to a per unit fee. 124
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 24
- ‘Plan Storage, Asset Management, & GIS Maintenance Fee’ was changed from a percent of permit fee to a per sheet fee.
These modifications ensure that the proposed fee schedule more accurately reflects the services that Public Works / Engineering provides.
DETAILED RESULTS
The Engineering Division collects fees for grading permits, tentative parcel maps, site plans, encroachment permits, and inspections. The total cost calculated for each service includes direct staff costs and Departmental, Divisional, and Citywide overhead. The following table details the fee name, current fee, total cost, and difference associated with each service offered.
TABLE 7: TOTAL COST PER UNIT RESULTS – ENGINEERING
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Land Development Fees
Specific Plan $3,871
Refer to
Planning
Deposit N/A
Specific Plan Amendment $2,540
Refer to
Planning
Deposit N/A
E.I.R $2,862
Refer to
Planning
Deposit N/A
Drainage Study (Preliminary and Final)
Under 10 Acres Modified $5,761 N/A
10 Acres or Greater Modified $10,711 N/A
Revisions Modified $2,923 N/A
4th Review (Or Additional) Modified $1,862 N/A
Water Quality Management Plan (Preliminary and Final)
Under 10 Acres Modified $3,609 N/A
10 Acres or Greater Modified $5,859 N/A
Revisions Modified $1,711 N/A
4th Review (Or Additional) Modified $1,187 N/A
Traffic Study Screening Memo New $1,179 N/A
Traffic Study Scoping Agreement New $2,164 N/A
Traffic Impact Analysis $2,504 $4,630 ($2,126)
Soils Report $2,742 $3,373 ($631)
Tentative Parcel Map
Base $1,843 $8,715 ($6,872)
Per Sheet New $2,250 N/A
4th Review (Or Additional) New $750 N/A
Tentative Tract Map
Base $2,531 $8,715 ($6,184)
Per Sheet New $3,375 N/A
4th Review (Or Additional) New $1,125 N/A
125
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 25
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Site Plan
Residential $289 $1,902 ($1,613)
Multi-Family and Other Non-Residential $289 $4,501 ($4,212) 4th Review (Or Additional) New $1,500 N/A
Preliminary Grading Plan
Under 10 Acres New $6,814 N/A
10 Acres or Greater New $12,650 N/A
Revisions New $3,493 N/A
4th Review (Or Additional) New $4,053 N/A
Utility Site Plan
Under 10 Acres New $3,555 N/A
10 Acres or Greater New $5,968 N/A
Revisions New $1,918 N/A
4th Review (Or Additional) New $2,543 N/A
Water Supply Verification / Assessment (WSA) New
Actual Cost
+ 10% N/A
Sewer Availability Verification / Assessment New
Actual Cost
+ 10% N/A
Reclaimed Water New
Actual Cost
+ 10% N/A
Sewer Waste Survey New $939 N/A
Conceptual Landscape Plan Review New $663 N/A
Flood Zone Development Review $705 $2,165 ($1,460)
Consultant Service
$184 +
Consultant's
Fee
Actual Cost
+ 10% N/A
Final Map/Easement Review
Final Map:
Base New $5,186 N/A
Per Lot New $300 N/A
Fourth or Subsequent Review New $689 N/A
Amended Final Map $932 $4,273 ($3,341)
Condominium Plan $1,023
Actual Cost
+ 10% N/A
Certificate of Correction $836 $1,049 ($213)
Certificate of Compliance $653 $4,596 ($3,943)
Dedication Document (ROW or Easement) $224 $5,250 ($5,026) Street Vacation $435 $5,250 ($4,815)
Lot Line Adjustment $619 $5,250 ($4,631)
Lot Merger $619 $5,250 ($4,631)
Consultant Service
$183 +
Consultant's
Fee
Actual Cost
+ 10% N/A
Plan Review
Grading:
Base Modified $3,209 N/A
Per Sheet Modified $1,045 N/A
126
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 26
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Precise Grading:
Base Modified $4,254 N/A
Per Sheet Modified $1,913 N/A
Erosion Control (If Separate from Grading Plan):
Base New $2,347 N/A
Per Sheet New $300 N/A
Improvement Plan Review (Street, Signing and Striping,
Traffic Signal, Traffic Control, Storm Drain, Channel, Sewer, Water, Non-Potable Water):
Base Modified $4,949 N/A
Per Sheet Modified $573 N/A
Plan Revisions:
Base New $1,154 N/A
Per Sheet New $1,393 N/A
4th or Subsequent Review New $464 N/A
Other Improvement Plans: As Directed by City Engineer New Actual Cost
+ 10% N/A
Grading Permit Fees (Mass, Rough, Stockpile, Borrow)
Grading Permit:
51‐100 CY $45 $975 ($930)
101‐1,000 CY
Base $45 $1,412 ($1,367)
For Every 100 CY or Fraction Thereof $21 $57 ($36)
1,001‐10,000 CY
Base $230 $1,923 ($1,693)
For Every 1,000 CY or Fraction Thereof $25 $74 ($49)
10,001‐100,000 CY
Base $380 $2,585 ($2,205)
For Every 10,000 CY or Fraction Thereof $75 $175 ($100) 100,001 or more CY
Base $1,075 $4,163 ($3,088)
For Every 100,000 CY or Fraction Thereof $85 $132 ($47) Encroachment Permit Fees
Encroachment Permit $352 $1,643 ($1,291)
Excavation Permit New $1,643 N/A
Demolition New $1,643 N/A
Curb & Gutter:
<100 ft. $60 $496 ($436)
>100 ft. $43 $188 ($145)
Sidewalk:
<400 sq. ft $60 $456 ($396)
>400 sq. ft $19 $148 ($129)
Pavement:
<1,000 ft. $120 $556 ($436)
Each Additional 1,000 ft. $95 $248 ($153)
Driveway Approach:
Residential $60 $620 ($560)
Commercial $81 $660 ($579)
127
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 27
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Wheelchair Ramp $60 $536 ($476)
Cross Gutter / Spandrel $103 $496 ($393)
Sewer main, storm drain, water main:
<50 ft. $82 $716 ($634)
>50 ft. $43 $377 ($334)
Sewer Lateral $60 $815 ($755)
Water Service $60 $617 ($557)
Sewer Manhole $81 $737 ($656)
Sewer Clean Out $82 $557 ($475)
Water Line Hot Tap $174 $815 ($641)
Storm Drain Inlet:
Storm Drain Inlet $189 $868 ($679)
Storm Drain Connector Pipe $145 $748 ($603)
Parkway Drain $81 $748 ($667)
Fire Hydrant $270 $776 ($506)
Air Vac Blow Off $103 $656 ($553)
Street Tree $60 $368 ($308)
Street Name & Traffic Sign $60 $368 ($308)
Inspections
Industrial Waste Inspection $175 $175 $0
NPDES Inspection / Reinspection - City Staff Modified $594 N/A NPDES Inspection / Reinspection - Consultant
Commercial Food Facilities and Non-IG Permit
Inspections New $331 N/A
IG Permit Facilities, Businesses, and SB205 Compliance New $394 N/A Reinspection Charge New $257 N/A
Overtime Inspection
1.5 x time
spent $266 N/A
Re‐Inspection Fee $154 $239 ($85)
Inspections ‐ Subdivision Developments 4% 4% 0%
Miscellaneous Fees
Reimbursement Agreement $1,056 $2,658 ($1,602)
Appeals to City Council or Planning Commission $543 $1,422 ($879) Public Right of Way Items
Oversized/weight permit (Caltrans Rate):1
Single Trip $16 $16 $0
Annual $90 $90 $0
Penalty for Work w/o Permit $244
2x Permit
Fees N/A
Dumpster / POD in Public ROW New $331 N/A
Street Closure New $557 N/A
Special District Annexation New
Actual Cost
+ 10% N/A
Fee for Services Not Specified Above New $294 N/A
1 21 CCR § 1411.3
128
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 28
The fees administered by the Engineering Division generally under-recover the associated costs. The fee with the largest under-recovery is the base fee for the ‘Tentative Parcel Map’ at around $6,900. The smallest undercharge is in relation to the Grading Permit ‘101‐1,000 CY - For Every 100 CY or Fraction Thereof’ of roughly $36.
ANNUAL REVENUE IMPACT
Based on the prior year’s (FY23/24) workload information, Engineering has a deficit of roughly $130,000.
The following table shows the revenue at current fee, total projected annual cost, and the resulting difference by major fee category.
TABLE 8: ANNUAL RESULTS – ENGINEERING
Fee Category Revenue at Current Fee Annual Cost Difference Land Development Fees $14,744 $35,704 ($20,960)
Grading Plan Review $61,079 $51,122 $9,957
Grading Permit Fees $45 $975 ($930)
Encroachment Permit Fees $32,603 $151,224 ($118,621)
Inspections $519,197 $519,197 $0
Miscellaneous Fees $1,552 $1,552 $0
Total $629,221 $759,774 ($130,553)
Engineering has an annual cost recovery of roughly 83%. At $119,000, the largest deficit is in relation to Public Works Encroachment Fees. This is primarily caused by the Encroachment permit which has a deficit of roughly $57,000. A per-unit deficit of about $1,300 processed 44 times leads to this very large deficit. The Division should review this fee and consider right-sizing it to allow for greater cost recovery. 129
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 29
Economic Development currently administers film permits to oversee and regulate filming activities within the City limits. The fees associated with these permits were examined as part of the study. The following subsections discuss fee schedule modifications and detail per-unit results for the Film Permit fees.
FEE SCHEDULE MODIFICATIONS
City staff proposed expanding the singular ‘Film Permit Fee’ into three subcategories: ‘Minor Impact’, ‘Moderate Impact’, and ‘High Impact’. This proposed modification will allow the City to better recover costs for more complex permits.
DETAILED RESULTS
Economic Development collects fees for film permits. These fees are in addition to any costs associated with needed street closures, traffic control, use of public right-of-way, or City staffing (such as Police or Fire presence). The total cost calculated for each service includes direct staff costs and Departmental, Divisional, and Citywide overhead. The following table details the fee name, current fee, total cost, and difference associated with each service offered.
TABLE 9: TOTAL COST PER UNIT RESULTS – FILM
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Film Permit Fee
Minor Impact $300 $1,024 ($724)
Moderate Impact $300 $2,277 ($1,977)
High Impact $300 $4,742 ($4,442)
The Film Permit fees under-recover the associated costs. The largest under-recovery is for a ‘High Impact’ film permit at around $4,500; the lowest is for a ‘Minor Impact’ permit at about $750.
ANNUAL REVENUE IMPACT
Because these fees are not currently tracked at the necessary level of detail, no annual revenue impacts are presented here.
FILM PERMITS
130
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 30
The Finance and Administration fee category encompasses document printing and photocopying, other document-related services, returned check processing, and the provision of copies of digital media. The City Clerk and Finance departments are responsible for overseeing, processing, and administering these fees. The following subsections discuss fee schedule modifications and detail per-unit results for the Finance and Administration fees.
FEE SCHEDULE MODIFICATIONS
In discussions with City staff, the following modifications were proposed to the current fee schedule:
• Eliminated Fees: The following fees were eliminated, as they represent obsolete services:
- ‘Providing Agendas, Minutes, Packet, etc.’
- ‘Copy of Budget – Other Than’
- ‘Copy of Audit Report – Other’
- ‘Cassette Tape of Meeting, etc.’
• Condensed Fees: To streamline the fee schedule, the ‘Photocopying of Documents’ fee was combined with the ‘Document Printing’ fees.
• Modified Fees: The fee for a ‘DVD of any live broadcast’ was modified to read ‘Digital Copy of any City Broadcast’ for clarity.
The modifications proposed ensure that the proposed fee schedule better reflects the services being provided by Finance staff.
DETAILED RESULTS
The Finance and Administration collects fees for document printing, photocopying fees, bond document fees, document certification, postage, and return check processing. The total cost calculated for each service includes direct staff costs and Departmental, Divisional, and Citywide overhead. The following table details the fee name, current fee, total cost, and difference associated with each service offered.
TABLE 10: TOTAL COST PER UNIT RESULTS – FINANCE
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Document Printing / Photocopying Fees:2
Black & White $0.25 $0.25 $0.00
Color $0.35 $0.35 $0.00
2 GOV § 6253(b)
FINANCE
131
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 31
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Oversized (maps) Actual Cost
Actual
Cost N/A
Bound Document Fees:3
Binding Materials $1.00 $1.00 $0.00
Per Page Charge
Black & White $0.25 $0.25 $0.00
Color $0.35 $0.35 $0.00
Document Certification4 Modified $15.00 N/A
Postage Actual Cost
Actual
Cost N/A
Return Check Processing: 5
1st Check $25 $25 $0
2nd Check $25 $35 ($10)
Digital Copy of any City live broadcast6 $7 $7 $0
The fees administered by Finance and Administration generally fully recover costs. The only undercharge is for the ‘Return Check Processing – 2nd Check’ at $10.
ANNUAL REVENUE IMPACT
Due to the complexity of the City’s financial reporting system, per unit information was unable to be gathered and therefore no annual revene impacts are presented here. 3 GOV § 6253(b)
4 GOV § 8223 (b)
5 CIV § 1719(a)
6 GOV § 6253.9(a)
132
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 32
The City of Banning contracts with CalFire for Fire services. The fees examined within this study relate to plan review and inspection and fire code compliance. The following subsections discuss fee schedule modifications, detailed per unit results, and annual results for the fee-related services provided by Fire.
FEE SCHEDULE MODIFICATIONS
The only modifications proposed to the Fire fee schedule were in relation to false alarms. Staff proposed breaking out False Alarms between commercial / industrial and residential, as well as codifying the false alarm response fee in the fee schedule.
DETAILED RESULTS
The Fire Department collects fees for sprinkler permits, alarm permits, water system permits, protection systems permits, hazmat permits, and inspections. The total cost calculated for each service includes direct staff costs and Departmental, Divisional, and Citywide overhead. The following table details the fee name, current fee, total cost, and difference associated with each service offered.
TABLE 11: TOTAL COST PER UNIT RESULTS – FIRE
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
FIRE FEES FOR SPRINKLER PERMITS (FSS, FSD, FMS)
New 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System plan check (base fee) $662 $719 ($57) New 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System inspection (per sprinkler head) $7 $10 ($3)
New 13D Fire Sprinkler System plan check (base fee) $284 $308 ($24) New 13D Fire Sprinkler System inspection (per sprinkler head) (each separate plan type) $7 $10 ($3)
TI 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System plan check (base fee) $473 $513 ($40) TI 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System inspection (per sprinkler head) $7 $10 ($3) TI 13D Fire Sprinkler System plan check (base fee) $237 $256 ($19) TI 13D Fire Sprinkler System inspection (per sprinkler head) $7 $10 ($3) Construction Reinspection Fee (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.) $756 $822 ($66) Additional Alternate methods and materials Plan Review $189 $205 ($16) Consultant Fire Plan Review Actual Cost + 15%
Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) 3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) Expedited / Overtime Plan Review (per hour) $284 $308 ($24) Expedited / Overtime Inspection (per hour) $284 $308 ($24) Work without Permit (PENALTY) $378 $411 ($33)
FIRE FEES FOR ALARM PERMITS (FAL)
New Fire Alarm System plan check (base fee) $662 $719 ($57) New Fire Alarm System inspection (per initiating or notification device) $7 $10 ($3)
FIRE
133
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 33
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
TI Fire Alarm System Plan Check (base fee) $473 $513 ($40) TI Fire Alarm System Inspection (per initiating or notification device) $7 $10 ($3)
Monitoring Only Plan Check (or Communicator upgrade per unit) $189 $205 ($16) Monitoring Only Inspection (or Communicator upgrade per unit) $189 $205 ($16) Construction Reinspection Fee (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.) $756 $822 ($66) Additional Alternate methods and materials Plan Review (per hour) $189 $205 ($16)
Consultant Fire Plan Review Actual Cost + 15%
Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) 3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) Expedited / Overtime Plan Review (per hour) $284 $308 ($24) Expedited / Overtime Inspection (per hour) $284 $308 ($24) Work without Permit (PENALTY) $378 $411 ($33)
FIRE FEES FOR WATER SYSTEM PERMITS (FWT)
Underground plan check (per connection i.e. hydrant and/or riser) $284 $308 ($24) Underground inspection (per connection i.e. hydrant and/or riser) $378 $411 ($33) Fire Pump plan check $567 $616 ($49)
Fire Pump inspection $473 $513 ($40)
Aboveground Temporary Tank plan check $284 $308 ($24)
Aboveground Temporary Tank inspection $284 $308 ($24)
Emergency Underground Repair plan check $284 $308 ($24) Emergency Underground Repair inspection $567 $616 ($49) Standpipes/Hose valves plan check $284 $308 ($24)
Standpipes/Hose valves inspection $378 $411 ($33)
Construction Reinspection Fee (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.) $756 $822 ($66) Additional Alternate methods and materials Plan Review $189 $205 ($16) Consultant Fire Plan Review Actual Cost + 15%
Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) 3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) Expedited / Overtime Plan Review (per hour) $284 $308 ($24) Expedited / Overtime Inspection (per hour) $284 $308 ($24) Work without Permit (PENALTY) $378 $411 ($33)
FIRE FEES FOR PROTECTION SYSTEMS PERMITS (FPS)
Special Extinguishing System plan check $520 $565 ($45) Special Extinguishing System inspection $284 $308 ($24) Hood and Duct Extinguishing System plan check (per system) $284 $308 ($24) Hood and Duct Extinguishing System inspection (per system) $284 $308 ($24) Smoke Control - Rationale Analysis and Plan Review $1,323 $1,439 ($116) Smoke Control System inspection $1,134 $1,233 ($99)
Construction Reinspection Fee (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.) $756 $822 ($66) Additional Alternate methods and materials Plan Review $189 $205 ($16) Consultant Fire Plan Review Actual Cost + 15%
Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) 134
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 34
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) Expedited / Overtime Plan Review (per hour) $284 $308 ($24) Expedited / Overtime Inspection (per hour) $284 $308 ($24) Work without Permit (PENALTY) $378 $411 ($33)
FIRE FEES FOR OTHER SYSTEMS PERMITS (FOS)
Industrial Oven plan check (per oven) $378 $411 ($33)
Industrial Oven inspection (per oven) $378 $411 ($33)
Dust Collection System plan check $378 $411 ($33)
Dust Collection System inspection $378 $411 ($33)
Battery System plan check (Commercial) $378 $411 ($33)
Battery System inspection (Commercial) $378 $411 ($33)
Refrigeration System < 500 lbs. plan check $567 $616 ($49) Refrigeration System < 500 lbs. inspection $284 $308 ($24) Refrigeration System ≥ 500 lbs. plan check $945 $1,027 ($82) Refrigeration System ≥ 500 lbs. inspection $567 $616 ($49) Spray Booths (per booth) plan check $284 $308 ($24)
Spray Booths (per booth) inspection $189 $205 ($16)
Gas Systems (Med Gas, Industrial Gas, LPG) plan check $567 $616 ($49) Gas Systems (Med Gas, Industrial Gas, LPG) inspection $378 $411 ($33) Emergency Responder Radio Coverage plan check $756 $822 ($66) Emergency Responder Radio Coverage inspection $756 $822 ($66) Construction Reinspection Fee (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.) $756 $822 ($66) Additional Alternate methods and materials Plan Review (per hour) $189 $205 ($16)
Consultant Fire Plan Review Actual Cost + 15%
Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) 3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) Expedited / Overtime Plan Review (per hour) $284 $308 ($24) Expedited / Overtime Inspection (per hour) $284 $308 ($24) Work without Permit (PENALTY) $378 $411 ($33)
FIRE FEES FOR ACCESS & WATER REVIEWS (FAW, FPP)
Access and Water Supply plan check $189 $205 ($16)
Access and Water Supply inspection $378 $411 ($33)
Fuel Modification Plan check $378 $411 ($33)
Fuel Modification inspection $189 $205 ($16)
Construction Reinspection Fee (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.) $756 $822 ($66) Additional Alternate methods and materials Plan Review (per hour) $189 $205 ($16)
Consultant Fire Plan Review (actual consultant fee +20%) Actual Cost + 15% Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) 3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) Expedited / Overtime Plan Review (per hour) $284 $308 ($24) Expedited / Overtime Inspection (per hour) $284 $308 ($24) Work without Permit (PENALTY) $378 $411 ($33)
FIRE FEES FOR HAZ MAT PERMITS (FHM)
135
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 35
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Haz-Mat Chem Class <10 Chemicals plan check $284 $308 ($24) Haz-Mat Chem Class<10 Chemicals inspection $189 $205 ($16) Haz-Mat Chem Class 10 - 25 Chemicals plan check $473 $513 ($40) Haz-Mat Chem Class 10 - 25 Chemicals inspection $284 $308 ($24) Haz-Mat Chem Class 26 - 100 Chemicals plan check $756 $822 ($66) Haz-Mat Chem Class 26 - 100 Chemicals inspection $473 $513 ($40) Haz-Mat Chem Class >100 Chemicals plan check $1,040 $1,130 ($90) Haz-Mat Chem Class >100 Chemicals inspection $662 $719 ($57) Underground Storage Tanks plan check (per tank) Installation or Removal $426 $462 ($36)
Underground Storage Tanks inspection (per tank) Installation or Removal $189 $205 ($16)
Aboveground Storage Tanks plan check (per tank) Installation or Removal $426 $462 ($36)
Aboveground Storage Tanks inspection (per tank) Installation or Removal $189 $205 ($16)
Alterations to gas stations plan check (no tank alterations) $284 $308 ($24) Alterations to gas stations inspection (no tank alterations) $189 $205 ($16) Construction Reinspection Fee (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.) $756 $822 ($66) Additional Alternate methods and materials Plan Review (per hour) $189 $205 ($16)
Consultant Fire Plan Review (actual consultant fee +20%) Actual Cost + 15% Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) 3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) Expedited / Overtime Plan Review (per hour) $284 $308 ($24) Expedited / Overtime Inspection (per hour) $284 $308 ($24) Work without Permit (PENALTY) $378 $411 ($33)
FIRE FEES FOR HIGH PILE STORAGE PERMITS (FHP)
High Pile Storage <12,000 sq. ft. Plan Check $378 $411 ($33) High Pile Storage <12,000 sq. ft. Inspection $378 $411 ($33) High Pile Storage 12,001 - 50,000 sq. ft. Plan Check $756 $822 ($66) High Pile Storage 12,001 - 50,000 sq. ft. Inspection $756 $822 ($66) High Pile Storage 50,001 - 100,000 sq. ft. Plan Check $1,134 $1,233 ($99) High Pile Storage 50,001 - 100,000 sq. ft. Inspection $1,134 $1,233 ($99) High Pile Storage > 100,000 sq. ft. Plan Check $1,512 $1,644 ($132) High Pile Storage > 100,000 sq. ft. Inspection $1,512 $1,644 ($132) Construction Reinspection Fee (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.) $756 $822 ($66) Additional Alternate methods and materials Plan Review (per hour) $189 $205 ($16)
Consultant Fire Plan Review (actual consultant fee +20%) Actual Cost + 15% Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) 3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) Expedited / Overtime Plan Review (per hour) $284 $308 ($24) Expedited / Overtime Inspection (per hour) $284 $308 ($24) Work without Permit (PENALTY) $378 $411 ($33)
FIRE FEES FOR INSPECTIONS (FIN)
136
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 36
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Residential Care Facility Pre-inspection (6 or less) $189 $205 ($16) Residential Day Care Facility 8-14 Fire Clearance $189 $205 ($16) Special Event WITH tents and/or canopies >400 sq. ft. $378 $411 ($33) Special Event with NO tents and/or canopies $189 $205 ($16) Carnivals and Fairs $378 $411 ($33)
Explosives or Blasting Agents, use, dispose $378 $411 ($33) Firework Displays $1,134 $1,233 ($99)
Complaints (not on fee schedule but is documented under this record type) $0 $102 ($102)
Fire Clearances (not on fee schedule but is documented under this record type for hospital, res. care facility 850 fire clearance, etc.) $189 $205 ($16)
Hydrant/Control Valve Flow Test $284 $308 ($24)
Fire Standby (per hour - During work hours) $189 $205 ($16) Fire Standby (per hour - During off work hours) $284 $308 ($24) Miscellaneous Inspection (uses 1 hour of the hourly rate fee) $189 $205 ($16)
MISCELLANEOUS FIRE FEES
Plan Review (per hour) for items not identified on fee schedule $189 $205 ($16) Inspection (per hour) for items not identified on fee schedule $189 $205 ($16) False Alarm - Commercial / Industrial $378 $411 ($33)
False Alarm - Residential $378 $411 ($33)
False Alarm Response (Only applicable after 3rd False Alarm) New $411 N/A
ANNUAL PERMITS
Business
A-1 occupancies: Assembly uses, usually with fixed seating, intended for the production and viewing of performing arts or motion pictures <20,000 sq. ft. $284 $308 ($24)
A-1 occupancies: Assembly uses, usually with fixed seating, intended for the production and viewing of
performing arts or motion pictures ≥20,000 sq. ft. $567 $616 ($49) A-2 occupancies: Assembly uses intended for food and/or drink consumption <10,000 sq. ft. $189 $205 ($16)
A-2 occupancies: Assembly uses intended for food and/or drink consumption > 10,000 sq. ft. $284 $308 ($24)
A-3 occupancies: Assembly uses intended for worship, recreation or amusement and other assembly occupancies not classified as A-1, A-2, A-4, and A-5 occupancies <20,000 sq. ft. $284 $308 ($24) A-3 occupancies: Assembly uses intended for worship, recreation or amusement and other assembly
occupancies not classified as A-1, A-2, A-4, and A-5 occupancies ≥20,000 sq. ft. $567 $616 ($49)
A-4 occupancies: Assembly uses intended for viewing of indoor sporting events and activities with spectator seating <20,000 sq. ft. $284 $308 ($24)
A-4 occupancies: Assembly uses intended for viewing of indoor sporting events and activities with
spectator seating ≥20,000 sq. ft. $567 $616 ($49)
A-5 occupancies: Assembly uses intended for participation in or viewing outdoor activities. $284 $308 ($24)
B, F, M or S Occupancies < 3,600 Square Feet $189 $205 ($16) 137
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 37
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
B, F, M or S Occupancies 3,601 - 50,000 Square Feet $378 $411 ($33) B, F, M or S Occupancies 50,001 - 350,000 sq. ft. $567 $616 ($49) B, F, M or S Occupancies > 350,000 sq. ft. $1,134 $1,233 ($99) H or L Occupancy $567 $616 ($49)
2nd Re-Inspection Penalty $378 $411 ($33)
3rd + Re-inspection Penalty $500 $543 ($43)
Work without Permit $378 $411 ($33)
Multi-Family
R-1 Occupancy (i.e. hotels, motels) <25 units $567 $616 ($49) R-1 Occupancy (i.e. hotels, motels) 26-50 units $709 $770 ($61) R-1 Occupancy (i.e. hotels, motels) 51-75 units $851 $925 ($74) R-1 Occupancy (i.e. hotels, motels) 76-100 units $993 $1,079 ($86) R-1 Occupancy (i.e. hotels, motels) >100 units $1,134 $1,233 ($99) R-2 Occupancy (i.e. Res Permanent 3+) per unit $48 $51 ($3) Care Facility Residential State Licensed - 6 or less Pre-inspection Fee $189 $205 ($16)
Care Facility Commercial 0-50 State Licensed $378 $411 ($33) Care Facility Commercial 51-99 State Licensed $473 $513 ($40) Care Facility Commercial 100-150 State Licensed $567 $616 ($49) Care Facility Commercial ≥ 151 State Licensed $756 $822 ($66) 2nd Re-Inspection Penalty $378 $411 ($33)
3rd + Re-inspection Penalty $500 $543 ($43)
Work without Permit (PENALTY) $378 $411 ($33)
State-Mandated
E Occupancy (Schools) <10,000 sq. ft. $284 $308 ($24)
E Occupancy (Schools) > 10,000 sq. ft. $756 $822 ($66)
Hospitals <10,000 S.F. $284 $308 ($24)
Hospitals > 10,000 S.F. $756 $822 ($66)
Skilled Nursing < 10,000 S.F. $284 $308 ($24)
Skilled Nursing > 10,000 S.F. $756 $822 ($66)
Jail <10,000 S.F. $284 $308 ($24)
Jail > 10,000 S.F. $756 $822 ($66)
High-Rise 75' or more $1,134 $1,233 ($99)
Day Care Facilities Residential 8-14 Fire Clearance $189 $205 ($16) Day Care Facilities Commercial 0-50 $189 $205 ($16)
Day Care Facilities Commercial 51-100 $378 $411 ($33)
Day Care Facilities Commercial 101-150 $430 $462 ($32)
Day Care Facilities Commercial >150 $473 $513 ($40)
2nd Re-Inspection Penalty $378 $411 ($33)
3rd + Re-inspection Penalty $500 $543 ($43)
Work without Permit (PENALTY) $378 $411 ($33)
Fire Code Permits (CFC Operational Permits)
Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing) $189 $205 ($16)
Aerosol Products Level 2 & 3 $95 $102 ($7)
Amusement Buildings (Special Amusement Buildings) $284 $308 ($24) Carnivals and Fairs $95 $102 ($7)
Cellulose Nitrate $95 $102 ($7)
138
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 38
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Combustible Dust Producing & Operations $189 $205 ($16) Combustible Fibers $189 $205 ($16)
Compressed Gases $189 $205 ($16)
Covered and Uncovered Mall Buildings $284 $308 ($24)
Cryogenic Fluids $189 $205 ($16)
Cutting and Welding $95 $102 ($7)
Dry Cleaning Plants 1-2 units $95 $102 ($7)
Dry Cleaning Plants > 2 units $284 $308 ($24)
Energy Storage System $378 $411 ($33)
Exhibits and trade Shows $189 $205 ($16)
Explosives $189 $205 ($16)
Hydrant/Control Valve Flow Test $189 $205 ($16)
Flammable/Combustible Liquids Inside ≥60 Gal. $189 $205 ($16) Flammable/Combustible Liquids Inside <60 Gal. $95 $102 ($7) Flammable/Combustible Liquid Outside/Aboveground tank
(per tank) $142 $154 ($12)
Flammable/Combustible Liquid Underground Tanks (per tank) $142 $154 ($12) Fruit and Crop Ripening $142 $154 ($12)
Hazardous Materials $189 $205 ($16)
Hazardous Production Materials $189 $205 ($16)
High-Piled Combustible Stock <12,000 sq. ft. $189 $205 ($16) High-Piled Combustible Stock 12,000 - 100,000 sq. ft. $473 $513 ($40) High-Piled Combustible Stock >100,000 sq. ft. $756 $822 ($66) Hot Work Operations $95 $102 ($7)
Industrial Ovens/Drying $189 $205 ($16)
Lumber yards and woodworking plants $378 $411 ($33)
Liquid or Gas Filled Vehicles in Assemblies $189 $205 ($16) Liquefied Petroleum Gases $95 $102 ($7)
Magnesium $95 $102 ($7)
Miscellaneous Combustible Storage $189 $205 ($16)
Mobile Fueling of Hydrogen Fueled Vehicles $189 $205 ($16) Motor vehicle Fuel Dispensing Facilities $189 $205 ($16) Open Flame and/ or Candles in Assembly Occupancies $95 $102 ($7) Organic Coatings $189 $205 ($16)
Places of Assembly $189 $205 ($16)
Plant Extraction Systems $189 $205 ($16)
Pyrotechnical Special Effects $756 $822 ($66)
Pyroxylin plastics $189 $205 ($16)
Refrigeration Equipment <500 lbs. $189 $205 ($16)
Refrigeration Equipment ≥500 lbs. $378 $411 ($33)
Repair Garages and Motor Fuel Dispensing Facilities $189 $205 ($16) Spray Booths/ Dipping Operations $189 $205 ($16)
Storage of Tires $189 $205 ($16)
Tire Rebuilding Plants $189 $205 ($16)
Waste Handling $95 $102 ($7)
Wood products $95 $102 ($7)
139
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 39
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Lithium Batteries $189 $205 ($16)
FIRE BUILDING PERMIT FEES - PLAN CHECK
Buildings for all Commercial Uses - (The enclosure for all newly constructed or added space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, I, M, S, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule where the interior is completed and occupiable (same fees as shell buildings)
0-1,999 sq. ft. $189 $205 ($16)
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. $237 $256 ($19)
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. $284 $308 ($24)
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. $378 $411 ($33)
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. $473 $513 ($40)
50,000+ - base $473 $513 ($40)
50,000+ - per 100,000 sq. ft. $9 $9 $0
Residential and Multifamily Residential Uses - (All newly constructed or added space for residential occupancies classified as CBC Group R, or other residential occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule)
0-1,999 sq. ft. $189 $205 ($16)
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. $237 $256 ($19)
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. $284 $308 ($24)
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. $378 $411 ($33)
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. $473 $513 ($40)
50,000+ - base $473 $513 ($40)
50,000+ - per 100,000 sq. ft. $9 $9 $0
Hazardous Use - (All newly constructed or added space for hazardous use occupancies classified as CBC Group H.
0-1,999 sq. ft. $237 $256 ($19)
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. $378 $411 ($33)
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. $520 $565 ($45)
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. $662 $719 ($57)
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. $804 $873 ($69)
50,000+ - base $804 $873 ($69)
50,000+ - per 100,000 sq. ft. $9 $9 $0
Shell Buildings for all Commercial Uses - (The enclosure for all newly constructed or added space for nonresidential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, I, M, S, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule where the interior is not completed or occupiable) 0-1,999 sq. ft. $189 $205 ($16)
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. $237 $256 ($19)
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. $284 $308 ($24)
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. $378 $411 ($33)
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. $473 $513 ($40)
50,000+ - base $473 $513 ($40)
50,000+ - per 100,000 sq. ft. $9 $9 $0
Tenant Improvement - (Remodeled space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, I, M, R, S, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere.) 0-1,999 sq. ft. $189 $205 ($16)
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. $237 $256 ($19)
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. $284 $308 ($24)
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. $378 $411 ($33)
140
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 40
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. $473 $513 ($40)
50,000+ - base $473 $513 ($40)
50,000+ - per 100,000 sq. ft. $9 $9 $0
Tenant Improvement - Hazardous Use (Remodeled space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group H)
0-1,999 sq. ft. $189 $205 ($16)
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. $284 $308 ($24)
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. $426 $462 ($36)
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. $567 $616 ($49)
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. $709 $770 ($61)
50,000+ - base $709 $770 ($61)
50,000+ - per 100,000 sq. ft. $14 $14 $0
Solar / Photovoltaic (BON / BFR / BRC)
Residential (over 20 kw) $189 $205 ($16)
Commercial $378 $411 ($33)
Generator / Cell Sites
Generator / Cell Sites $189 $205 ($16)
FIRE BUILDING PERMIT FEES - INSPECTION
Buildings for all Commercial Uses - (The enclosure for all newly constructed or added space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, I, M, S, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule where the interior is completed and occupiable (same fees as shell buildings)
0-1,999 sq. ft. $189 $205 ($16)
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. $237 $256 ($19)
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. $284 $308 ($24)
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. $378 $411 ($33)
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. $473 $513 ($40)
50,000+ - base $473 $513 ($40)
50,000+ - per 100,000 sq. ft. $9 $9 $0
Residential and Multifamily Residential Uses - (All newly constructed or added space for residential occupancies classified as CBC Group R, or other residential occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule)
0-1,999 sq. ft. $189 $205 ($16)
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. $237 $256 ($19)
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. $284 $308 ($24)
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. $378 $411 ($33)
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. $473 $513 ($40)
50,000+ - base $473 $513 ($40)
50,000+ - per 100,000 sq. ft. $9 $9 $0
Hazardous Use - (All newly constructed or added space for hazardous use occupancies classified as CBC Group H.
0-1,999 sq. ft. $237 $256 ($19)
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. $378 $411 ($33)
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. $520 $565 ($45)
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. $662 $719 ($57)
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. $804 $873 ($69)
50,000+ - base $804 $873 ($69)
50,000+ - per 100,000 sq. ft. $9 $9 $0
141
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 41
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Shell Buildings for all Commercial Uses - (The enclosure for all newly constructed or added space for nonresidential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, I, M, S, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule where the interior is not completed or occupiable) 0-1,999 sq. ft. $189 $205 ($16)
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. $237 $256 ($19)
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. $284 $308 ($24)
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. $378 $411 ($33)
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. $473 $513 ($40)
50,000+ - base $473 $513 ($40)
50,000+ - per 100,000 sq. ft. $9 $9 $0
Tenant Improvement - (Remodeled space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, I, M, R, S, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere.) 0-1,999 sq. ft. $189 $205 ($16)
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. $237 $256 ($19)
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. $284 $308 ($24)
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. $378 $411 ($33)
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. $473 $513 ($40)
50,000+ - base $473 $513 ($40)
50,000+ - per 100,000 sq. ft. $9 $9 $0
Tenant Improvement - Hazardous Use (Remodeled space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group H)
0-1,999 sq. ft. $189 $205 ($16)
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. $284 $308 ($24)
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. $426 $462 ($36)
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. $567 $616 ($49)
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. $709 $770 ($61)
50,000+ - base $709 $770 ($61)
50,000+ - per 100,000 sq. ft. $14 $14 $0
Solar / Photovoltaic (BON / BFR / BRC)
Residential (over 20 kw) $189 $205 ($16)
Commercial $378 $411 ($33)
Generator / Cell Sites
Generator / Cell Sites $284 $308 ($24)
ADDITIONAL FIRE FEES FOR BFC / BFR / BON
Consultant Fire Plan Review Actual Cost + 15%
Misc. / Over the Counter / Revisions $189 $205 ($16)
3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) Expedited / Overtime Plan Review (per hour) $284 $308 ($24) Expedited / Overtime Inspection (per hour) $284 $308 ($24)
FIRE PLANNING FEES
Entitlement Applications
Annexation Fee $189 $205 ($16)
Conditional Use Permit $567 $616 ($49)
Conditional Use Permit Amendment $567 $616 ($49)
Conditional Use Permit - Sexually Oriented Business $567 $616 ($49) Design Review $567 $616 ($49)
Design Review Amendment $567 $616 ($49)
Development Agreements $378 $411 ($33)
142
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 42
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
EIR- Administrative Charge $378 $411 ($33)
Environmental Assessment $378 $411 ($33)
Extension of Time, CUP, Design Review $189 $205 ($16)
Final Parcel Map $189 $205 ($16)
Final Tract Map (First 50 Lots) $189 $205 ($16)
Final tract Map (51 + lots) $378 $411 ($33)
General Plan Amendment (Land Use) $189 $205 ($16)
General Plan Amendment (Policy) $189 $205 ($16)
Landscape Review $189 $205 ($16)
Lot Line Adjustment (with existing building) $189 $205 ($16) Minor Modification of an Application $189 $205 ($16)
Pre-Application Review (PAC) $567 $616 ($49)
Site Plan Review $567 $616 ($49)
Specific Plan $378 $411 ($33)
Specific Plan Amendment $378 $411 ($33)
Temporary Use Permits - Minor $189 $205 ($16)
Temporary Use Permits - Major $378 $411 ($33)
Tentative Map Time Extension $189 $205 ($16)
Tentative Parcel Map $567 $616 ($49)
Tentative Tract Map (Less than 50 lots) $378 $411 ($33) Tentative Tract Map (50 lots or more) $567 $616 ($49)
Tentative Tract Map Condition Monitoring $189 $205 ($16) Variance $189 $205 ($16)
Zone Change $189 $205 ($16)
Cannabis Retailer Conditional Use Permit (CUP) $567 $616 ($49) Cannabis Cultivation, Manufacturing and Testing Laboratory Facilities Conditional Use Permit (CUP) $567 $616 ($49) Cannabis Microbusiness Conditional Use Permit (CUP) $567 $616 ($49) Custom Home Review $378 $411 ($33)
Development Agreement Amendment, Deposit $378 $411 ($33) Home Occupation Permit $189 $205 ($16)
Phasing Map $189 $205 ($16)
Plot Plan
With hearing $567 $616 ($49)
Without hearing (notice) $567 $616 ($49)
Without hearing (no notice) $567 $616 ($49)
Amended plot plan/substantial conformance $189 $205 ($16) Administrative (Includes second units) $189 $205 ($16)
Subdivision Sales Office (Trailer) and Model Home ComplexesTemporary $189 $205 ($16) Tentative Parcel Map
Residential $567 $616 ($49)
Commercial $567 $616 ($49)
Tentative Tract or Condo Map $567 $616 ($49)
Tentative Tract or Parcel Map Revised $567 $616 ($49)
Precise Grading plan review, per sheet $284 $308 ($24)
Water/Sewer plan review, per sheet $284 $308 ($24)
143
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 43
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
3rd review and subsequential submittals (per hour) $189 $205 ($16) All of the fees administered in relation to Fire Prevention under-recover. The largest under-recovery is under ‘Fire Fees For High Pile Storage Permits (FHP)’ for ‘High Pile Storage > 100,000 sq. ft. Plan Check’ and ‘High Pile Storage > 100,000 sq. ft. Inspection’ at $132. The smallest undercharges are for the ‘Per Sprinkler Head’ and ‘Per Device’ fees at $3 each.
ANNUAL REVENUE IMPACT
Based on the prior year’s (FY23/24) workload information, Fire has a deficit of roughly $17,000. The following table shows the revenue at current fee, total projected annual cost, and the resulting difference by major fee category.
TABLE 12: ANNUAL RESULTS – FIRE
Fee Category Revenue at Current Fee Annual Cost Difference Sprinkler Permits $61,328 $76,083 ($14,755)
Alarm Permits $6,715 $7,382 ($667)
Water System Permits $6,242 $6,779 ($537)
Protection Systems Permits $3,782 $4,103 ($321)
Access & Water Reviews $1,701 $1,848 ($147)
Haz Mat Permits $473 $513 ($40)
Inspections $1,134 $1,230 ($96)
Miscellaneous Fees $1,890 $2,051 ($161)
Total $83,265 $99,989 ($16,724)
Fire has an annual cost recovery of roughly 83%. At roughly $15,000, the largest deficit is in relation to Fire Fees for Sprinkler Permits. This is primarily caused by the ‘New 13D Fire Sprinkler System plan check (base fee)- New 13D Fire Sprinkler System inspection (per sprinkler head) (each separate plan type)’ which has a deficit of roughly $11,000. A per-unit deficit of about $3 processed 3,759 times leads to this large deficit.
144
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 44
The Parks and Recreation Department oversees all City-sponsored community, recreational, and sports activities; maintenance of parks; senior services and activities; and special events. They are also responsible for rentals of various City-owned spaces and facilities. The fees examined in this study relate to facility rentals, event staffing, vendors, and special events. The following subsections discuss fee schedule modifications, detailed per unit results, and annual revenue impacts for the fee-related services provided by Parks and Recreation.
FEE SCHEDULE MODIFICATIONS
In discussions with City staff, the following modifications were proposed to the current fee schedule:
• Eliminated Fees: Staff proposed eliminating ‘Roosevelt Soccer Field’ rental as that is no longer offered.
• New Fees: Staff proposed the addition of the following fees to better represent the rentals and services offered by the department:
- ‘Community Center Rental –Kitchen Only’
- ‘Art Welch Community Center’ – Full Facility & Kitchen rentals - ‘Refund Admin Fee’
- ‘Insurance Processing’
- ‘Custodial’
- ‘Vendor Fees’
- ‘Special Events’ – Application fees for new and recurring - ‘Staffing Fees – Special Events’
• Expanded Fees: The rental fees for the ‘Playhouse Bowl Building’ and the ‘Roosevelt Park Building’ were expanded to include separate Private and Non-Profit rates. • Modified Fees: To clarify and streamline the fee schedule, the following modifications were proposed:
- All rental fees were changed from a unit of ‘Per Rental’ to ‘Per Day’. - The ‘Ballfield Rental’ fee was clarified to read ‘Ballfield & Soccer Field Rental,’ and the subcategories changed to ‘Field Rental’ and ‘Field Lights’. - The ‘Laura May Steward Building’ rental fee was renamed ‘Playhouse Bowl Building’ to reflect the new name of the facility.
PARKS AND RECREATION
145
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 45
- The ‘Staffing Fees’ categories were changed from ‘Monday – Thursday’ to ‘Monday – Friday’.
The modifications proposed ensure that the proposed fee schedule better reflects the services being provided by Parks and Recreation staff.
DETAILED RESULTS
The Parks and Recreation Division collects fees for the municipal pool, activities, rentals, parks facilities, staffing, vendors and special events. Not all of these fees were evaluated through this study; the primary scope of this analysis was rental fees. The total cost calculated for each service includes direct staff costs and Departmental, Divisional, and Citywide overhead. The following table details the fee name, current fee, total cost, and difference associated with each service offered.
TABLE 13: TOTAL COST PER UNIT RESULTS – PARKS AND RECREATION Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Municipal Pool
Private Rentals $161 $791 ($630)
Cabana Rentals (during open swim) $69 $134 ($65)
Community Center Rental
Private Rates:
Gymnasium $140 $248 ($108)
Large Meeting Room $70 $248 ($178)
Small Meeting Room $60 $132 ($72)
Kitchen & Gym $325 $265 $60
Kitchen Only New $138 N/A
Non‐Profit Rates:
Gymnasium $70 $248 ($178)
Large Meeting Room $35 $248 ($213)
Small Meeting Room $35 $132 ($97)
Kitchen & Gym $200 $265 ($65)
Kitchen Only New $138 N/A
Senior Center Rental
Private Rates:
Nutrition Site $100 $171 ($71)
Multi‐Purpose Room $90 $152 ($62)
Non‐Profit Rates:
Nutrition Site $55 $171 ($116)
Multi‐Purpose Room $55 $152 ($97)
Art Welch Community Center
Private Rates:
Full Facility Rental New $376 N/A
Kitchen Only New $127 N/A
Non-Profit Rates:
Full Facility Rental New $376 N/A
Kitchen Only New $127 N/A
Parks Facilities
Private Rates:
146
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 46
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Park Picnic Shelter $30 $35 ($5)
Ballfield & Soccer Field Rental
Field Rental $30 $36 ($6)
Field Lights $17 $37 ($20)
Dysart Park $145 $429 ($284)
Amphitheater & Stage $45 $140 ($95)
Private Rates:
Playhouse Bowl Building $90 $88 $2
Roosevelt Park Building $90 $97 ($7)
Non-Profit Rates
Playhouse Bowl Building $90 $88 $2
Roosevelt Park Building $90 $97 ($7)
Staffing Fees
Monday - Friday 8:00am ‐ 5:00pm $20 $99 ($79)
Monday - Friday After 5pm, Sat, Sun and City Holidays $27 $111 ($84) Misc. Fees
Refund Admin Fee New $15 N/A
Insurance Processing New $15 N/A
Custodial New $170 N/A
Vendor Fees (City Events)
Outdoor Crafts Fairs and Marketplaces:
Daily $5 $43 ($38)
Yearly $26 $217 ($191)
Food Vendors
Permitted through Riverside County New $130 N/A
Non-Permitted through Riverside County New $215 N/A
Petting Zoo New $195 N/A
Carnival New $195 N/A
Special Events
Application Permit:
New New $130 N/A
Recurring New $65 N/A
Staffing Fees - Special Events
Police Officer New $180 N/A
Engineering (Street Closure) New $212 N/A
Fire Standby New Fire Fee N/A
Fire Marshall Review New Fire Fee N/A
Parks Staff New $156 N/A
Recreation Staff New $134 N/A
Water New $202 N/A
Electric New $225 N/A
The fees administered by Parks and Recreation are generally under-recovering. The fee with the largest under-recovery is the ‘Private Rental’ for pools at around $630 per hour, as that is exclusive private use of the facility. The smallest undercharge is in relation to rentals of the ‘Park Picnic Shelter’ at $5. 147
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 47
ANNUAL REVENUE IMPACT
Based on the prior year’s (FY23/24) workload information, Parks and Recreation has a deficit of roughly $26,000. The following table shows the revenue at current fee, total projected annual cost, and the resulting difference by major fee category.
TABLE 14: ANNUAL RESULTS – PARKS AND RECREATION
Fee Category Revenue at Current Fee Annual Cost Difference Community Center Rental $4,820 $7,710 ($2,890)
Senior Center Rental $235 $476 ($241)
Parks Facilities $5,666 $7,648 ($1,982)
Staffing Fees $6,009 $27,282 ($21,274)
Total $16,730 $43,116 ($26,386)
Parks and Recreation has an annual cost recovery of roughly 39%. At approximately $21,000, the largest source of this deficit is in relation to Staffing Fees. The City should review these line items and were appropriate make updates to allow for greater cost recovery. 148
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 48
The Planning Division is responsible for monitoring compliance with zoning policies and implementing the City’s general plan to ensure a high quality of life for residents. The fees examined within this study relate to appeals, conditional use permits, design review, environmental review, maps, amendments, signs, zoning, and cannabis business regulation, among others. The following subsections discuss fee schedule modifications detailed per unit results, and annual revenue impacts for the fee-related services provided by Planning.
FEE SCHEDULE MODIFICATIONS
In discussions with City staff, the following modifications were proposed to the current fee schedule:
• Eliminated Fees: To better reflect the services currently offered by the City, staff proposed removing the following fees, as they are covered under other permit or no longer relevant as stand-alone fees:
- ‘Adult Ent Zoning Permit’
- ‘Cannabis Cultivation Permit ‐ Personal’
- ‘Clarification of Ambiguity/Omission’
- ‘Environmental – EIR City Admin Charge’
- ‘Environmental – Environmental Assessment – ND or MND’ - ‘General Plan Amendment – Policy’
- ‘Lot Line Adjustment’ (duplicate)
- ‘Request for Public Hearing’
- ‘Review for ADU New Construction’
• ‘New Fees: Staff proposed the addition of the following fees, which represent either services already offered but not codified on the fee schedule or new services the City is looking to provide:
- ‘Development Agreement Amendment’
- ‘Development Agreement Annual Review’
- ‘Environmental – Environmental Document Review’’
- ‘Environmental – CEQA Determination’
- ‘Minor Exception – See BMC Section 17.80’
- ‘Noticing Fee for Public Hearing’
PLANNING
149
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 49
- ‘Planning Hourly Support’
- ‘SB9 Urban Lot Split - Two Unit Development’
- ‘Technical Staff Review’
- ‘Cannabis Regulatory Permit Renewal’
• Expanded Fees: Due to large variability in how the fees are administered, staff proposed expanding the following fee categories:
- The ‘Conditional Use Permit’, ‘Design Review’, ‘General Plan Amendment – Land Use’, and ‘Temporary Use Permit’ fees were expanded to include two subcategories: ‘Major’ and ‘Minor.’ - Under ‘Sign Permit’, ‘Sign Program’ was added.
• Modified Fees: The following points highlight various miscellaneous modifications proposed by staff:
- The ‘Tentative Tract Map’ fee was changed from ‘Less than 50 lots’ and ’50 lots or more’ to ‘Less than 50 lots’ plus an additional deposit amount per lot over 50 lots. - ‘Pre App Review’ was renamed to ‘Pre-Application Conference Review’ - The ‘Tentative Tract Map – Condition Monitoring’ fee was clarified to read ‘Tentative Tract Map – Condition/MMRP Monitoring.’
The modifications proposed ensure that the proposed fee schedule better reflects the services being provided by Planning staff.
DETAILED RESULTS
The Planning Division collects fees for zoning, use permits, design review, and environmental review, among other services. The total cost calculated for each service includes direct staff costs and Departmental, Divisional, and Citywide overhead. The following table details the fee name, current fee, total cost, and difference associated with each service offered.
TABLE 15: TOTAL COST PER UNIT RESULTS – PLANNING
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Annexation Fee $9,438 $10,000 ($562)
Appeal of PC Decision $1,895 $5,673 ($3,778)
Appeal of Planning Dept. Decision $3,624 $5,673 ($2,049) Certificate of Completion/Lot Line Adj $2,036 $1,028 $1,008 Conditional Use Permit:
Conditional Use Permit
Minor $4,888 $3,143 $1,745
Major $4,888 $5,108 ($220)
Conditional Use Permit Amendment $4,531 $3,143 $1,388
CUP ‐ Sexually Oriented Business $2,396 $7,598 ($5,202) Design Review:
150
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 50
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Design Review
Minor $6,093 $6,581 ($488)
Major $6,093 $11,528 ($5,435)
Design Review Amendment $4,635 $3,350 $1,285
Development Agreements:
Development Agreement $27,753 $27,753 $0
Development Agreement Amendment New $13,899 N/A
Development Agreement Annual Review New $4,231 N/A
Environmental:
Environmental Document Review Actual Cost + 15%
Environmental ‐ Mitigation Monitoring $5,335
Actual
Cost +
15% N/A
Environmental Filing Fee/ Environmental Fish and Game Fee Actual Cost + 15% CEQA Determination New $509 N/A
Extension of Time: CUP or Design Review $743 $1,635 ($892) General Plan Amendment:
Land Use
Minor $8,296 $4,908 $3,388
Major $8,296 $9,623 ($1,327)
Lot Merger $697 $696 $1
Minor Exception - See BMC Section 17.80 New $1,668 N/A
Minor modification of an Application $1,047 $1,045 $2
Mural permit $673 $619 $54
Noticing Fee for Public Hearing New $1,006 N/A
Planning Hourly Support New $196 N/A
Planning letters $174 $782 ($608)
Pre-Application Conference Review No Charge $1,218 N/A
SB9 Urban Lot Split - Two Unit Development New $2,367 N/A Sign Permit:
Freestanding Sign $517 $2,463 ($1,946)
Panel Change Only $112 $500 ($388)
Sign Program New $2,004 N/A
Sign Review $288 $816 ($528)
Temp Signs $288 $389 ($101)
Site Plan Review $890 $2,511 ($1,621)
Specific Plan:
Specific Plan $17,215 $16,133 $1,082
Specific Plan Amend $12,490 $11,656 $834
Temporary Use Permit:
Major $1,103 $2,454 ($1,351)
Minor $1,103 $1,275 ($172)
Technical Staff Review7 New $3,143 N/A
Unit Phasing Map $437 $488 ($51)
Variance $4,423 $6,111 ($1,688)
7 BMC Section 17.104
151
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 51
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Zone Change $7,166 $11,331 ($4,165)
Zone Text Amend. $7,200 $12,600 ($5,400)
Final Parcel Map $992 $1,921 ($929)
Final Tract Map:
First 50 lots $1,569 $1,701 ($132)
51+ lots $1,953 $1,701 $252
Landscape Review
Minor $969 $982 ($13)
Major $1,065 $2,947 ($1,882)
Tentative Map Time Extension $3,634 $5,108 ($1,474)
Tentative Parcel Map $8,550 $11,530 ($2,980)
Tentative Tract Map:
Less than 50 lots $9,588 $15,824 ($6,236)
50 lots or more $10,652 $15,824 ($5,172)
Condition/MMRP Monitoring $5,335 $3,297 $2,038
CANNABIS BUSINESS FEES
Cannabis Retailer Regulatory Permit $5,180 $8,173 ($2,993) Cannabis Cultivation, Manufacturing, and Testing Laboratory Facilities Regulatory Permit $4,870 $9,156 ($4,286)
Cannabis Microbusiness Regulatory Permit $5,180 $11,121 ($5,941) Cannabis Retailer Conditional Use Permit $10,000 $10,000 $0 Cannabis Cultivation, Manufacturing, and Testing Laboratory Facilities Conditional Use Permit $10,000 $10,000 $0
Cannabis Microbusiness Conditional Use Permit $10,000 $10,502 ($502) Cannabis Regulatory Permit Renewal New $3,429 N/A
The fees administered by the Planning Division show a mix of under- and over-recoveries; most fees under-recover. The fee with the largest under-recovery is the ‘Tentative Tract Map – Less than 50 lots’ at around $6,236. The smallest undercharge is in relation to the ‘Landscape Review – Minor’ at $13. The largest overcharges are in relation to the ‘General Plan Amendment – Land Use – Minor’ at $3,388. This over-recovery highlights the importance of expanding the current fee categories to more accurately recover costs. The smallest over-recovery is for a ‘Lot Merger’ ($1).
ANNUAL REVENUE IMPACT
Based on the prior year’s (FY23/24) workload information, Planning has a deficit of roughly $113,000.
The following table shows the revenue at current fee, total projected annual cost, and the resulting difference by major fee category.
TABLE 16: ANNUAL RESULTS – PLANNING
Fee Category Revenue at Current Fee Annual Cost Difference Conditional Use Permit $34,216 $27,896 $6,320
Design Review $42,651 $65,855 ($23,204)
Environmental $90,385 $90,385 $0
Extension of Time: CUP or Design Review $5,944 $13,080 ($7,136) Planning letters $870 $3,910 ($3,040)
152
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 52
Fee Category Revenue at Current Fee Annual Cost Difference Sign Permit $3,104 $8,733 ($5,629)
Site Plan Review $24,920 $70,308 ($45,388)
Specific Plan $12,490 $11,656 $834
Temporary Use Permit $8,824 $14,916 ($6,092)
Landscape Review $15,975 $44,205 ($28,230)
Tentative Map $3,634 $5,108 ($1,474)
Total $243,013 $356,052 ($113,039)
Planning has an annual cost recovery of roughly 68%. At about $45,000, the largest deficit is in relation to the ‘Site Plan Review Fee’. A per-unit deficit of about $1,600 processed 28 times leads to this significant deficit. Another notable deficit comes from the Landscape Review Fees. There is a $28,000 deficit from the ‘Landscape Review – Major’ fee. A per-unit deficit of about $1,900 processed 15 times also leads to a large deficit. The City should review these line items and make adjustments where appropriate to allow for greater cost recovery.
153
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 53
The Police Department is responsible enforcing the City’s laws and protecting the safety of its residents and visitors. The fees examined within this study relate to providing reports, staffing special events, releasing vehicles, responding to false alarms, and other miscellaneous services offered by the Department. The following subsections discuss fee schedule modifications and detailed per unit results for the fee-related services provided by the Police Department.
FEE SCHEDULE MODIFICATIONS
In discussions with City staff, the following modifications were proposed to the current fee schedule:
• Eliminated Fees: Staff proposed eliminating the following fees, as these services are no longer offered by the City or are infrequently requested or enforced:
- ‘DUI – Investigation and Fine’
- ‘Enforcement Charge – Recovery’
- ‘K-9 Unit Service Charge’
- ‘Public Dance Fee’
- ‘Traffic Control Fee’
- ‘Bicycle Licenses ‘
- ‘Vacant & Distressed Building Fee’
• Modified Fees: The following points highlight various miscellaneous modifications proposed by staff:
- The unit for ‘Photo Sales Charges’ was changed from ‘Per Print’ to ‘Per CD / DVD / Flash Drive.’
- The ‘Tape Duplication Fee’ was renamed ‘Electronic Media Duplication Fee’, and the unit was changed to ‘Per CD / DVD / Flash Drive’.
The modifications proposed ensure that the proposed fee schedule better reflects the services being provided by Police staff.
DETAILED RESULTS
The Police Department collects fees for reports, vehicle storage releases, livescan fingerprint fees and civil court case charges. The total cost calculated for each service includes direct staff costs and POLICE
154
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 54
Departmental, Divisional, and Citywide overhead. The following table details the fee name, current fee, total cost, and difference associated with each service offered.
TABLE 17: TOTAL COST PER UNIT RESULTS – POLICE
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
All Reports:8
Black & White $0.25 $0.25 $0
Color $0.35 $0.35 $0
Photo Sales Charges $10 $36 ($26)
Electronic Media Duplication Fee $15 $44 ($29)
Report Request Form:9
Black & White $0.25 $0.25 $0.00
Color $0.35 $0.35 $0.00
Photo Sales Charges $10 $36 ($26)
Electronic Media Duplication Fee $15 $44 ($29)
Special Events Charge (4 hr. minimum):
Per Officer $98 $180 ($83)
Per Corporal $105 $208 ($103)
Per Sergeant $120 $230 ($110)
Per Lieutenant $105 $268 ($163)
Per Captain $125 $269 ($144)
Vehicle Storage Release:
Vehicle Storage Release $115 $126 ($11)
30 Day $115 $126 ($11)
Clearance Letter Fee $25 $48 ($23)
Livescan Fingerprint Fee $15 $48 ($33)
Civil Court Case Charge Actual Cost
Repo Receipt Fee $15 $24 ($9)
The fees administered by the Police Department generally under-recover the associated costs. The fee with the largest under-recovery is the ‘Special Events Charge (4 hr. minimum) – Per Captain’ at around $144. The smallest undercharge is in relation to the ‘Repo Receipt Fee’ at $9.
ANNUAL REVENUE IMPACT
The Police Department does not keep records of Fingerprints, Vehicle Storage Releases, Repossessions, and False Alarm Responses in sufficient detail to allow for the calculation of revenue by type; therefore, annual revenue impacts were not calculated.
8 GOV § 6253(b)
9 GOV § 6253(b)
155
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 55
The City has various miscellaneous fees charged by its water and electric utilities, within the Public Works Department, that were examined in this study. These fees include account setup, disconnections and reconnections of service, and various related tests. The following subsections discuss fee schedule modifications and detailed per unit results for the Utility Billing fee-related services.
FEE SCHEDULE MODIFICATIONS
In discussions with City staff, the following modifications were proposed to the current fee schedule:
• Eliminated Fees: Staff proposed eliminating the following fees as these services are covered under Electric and Water Fees:
- ‘Trespass/Diversion/Theft of Service’
- ‘Meter Test/2nd request within one year’
• New Fees: Staff proposed the addition of the following fees as they highlight either services already offered but not codified on the fee schedule, or new services the City is looking to provide:
- ‘Radio Wire Repair Fee’
- ‘Broken Meter Box Replacement’
• Condensed Fees: To streamline the fee schedule, staff proposed condensing the following fees:
- Under ‘Electric / Water Deposit’,’ ‘All Other Classes of Service’ and ‘Reconnection After Processing for Non‐Payment’ were removed to consolidate this section.
The modifications proposed ensure that the proposed fee schedule better reflects the services being provided by Utility Billing staff.
DETAILED RESULTS
The Utility Billing Division collects fees electric and water deposits, broken lock fees, and electric and water account setups. The total cost calculated for each service includes direct staff costs and Departmental, Divisional, and Citywide overhead. The following table details the fee name, current fee, total cost, and difference associated with each service offered.
TABLE 18: TOTAL COST PER UNIT RESULTS – UTILITY BILLING Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Electric / Water Deposit:
Electric / Water Deposit ‐ Residential ‐ Initial ‐ Credit Check Green Rating $0 $26 ($26)
Yellow Rating $100 $105 ($5)
Red Rating $150 $158 ($8)
UTILITY BILLING
156
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 56
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
No Credit Check $0 $26 ($26)
Letter of Credit $150 $158 ($8)
Cut/Broken Lock Fee $15 $72 ($57)
Radio Wire Repair Fee New $414 N/A
Broken Meter Box Replacement New $1,148 N/A
Electric / Water Account Set:
Next business day $30 $415 ($385)
Same Day (8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.; 1:00-3:00pm) $45 $415 ($370) After Hours (3:00 - 8:00 a.m. next business day & holidays and weekends) $219 $384 ($165)
Miscellaneous Fees
Delinquent Notice Fee $18.00 $200 ($182)
Door Hanger Fee $13.50 $296 ($283)
The fees administered by the Utility Billing Division generally under-recover the associated costs. The largest under-recovery is for ‘Electric / Water Account Set – Next Business Day’ at $385. The smallest undercharge is for the ‘Electric / Water Deposit: Electric / Water Deposit ‐ Residential ‐ Initial ‐ Credit Check - Yellow Rating’ at $5.
ANNUAL REVENUE IMPACT
No line-item-level information is currently tracked for these services; therefore, annual revenue impacts were not calculated.
157
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 57
The Water Division, within the Public Works Department, is responsible for managing the City's water infrastructure to ensure the provision of a safe and reliable water supply to community members. The fees examined within this study relate to new water service connections, meter installation and inspection, fire flow testing, as well as wastewater services. The following subsections discuss fee schedule modifications and detailed per unit results for the fee-related services provided by the Water and Wastewater Divisions.
FEE SCHEDULE MODIFICATIONS
In discussions with City staff, the following modifications were proposed to the current fee schedule:
• New Fees: Staff proposed the addition of the ‘Installation of Angle Valve Fee’ to better capture a service not currently provided; as well as a Wastewater fee section to capture the services that are provided by Wastewater but currently not codified on the master fee schedule. • Expanded Fees: Due to variability in how the fees are administered, staff proposed expanding ‘Construction water meter deposit (hydrant meter)’ into the size of the meters.
The modifications proposed ensure that the proposed fee schedule better reflects the services being provided by Water staff.
DETAILED RESULTS
The Water Division collects fees for water meter reinstallations, water meter tests, water backflow/cross connection, and construction water meter deposits. The total cost calculated for each service includes direct staff costs and Departmental, Divisional, and Citywide overhead. The following table details the fee name, current fee, total cost, and difference associated with each service offered.
TABLE 19: TOTAL COST PER UNIT RESULTS – WATER & WASTEWATER Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Water Meter Reinstallation Fee:
3/4" Meter $142 $405 ($263)
1" Meter $142 $405 ($263)
1 1/2 " Meter $142 $835 ($693)
2" Meter $142 $835 ($693)
Anything larger than 2" $142 $1,389 ($1,247)
Water Meter Installation Fee of (Brand New Service):
3/4" Meter $285 $563 ($278)
1" Meter $414 $588 ($174)
1 1/2 " Meter $608 $1,176 ($568)
2" Meter $875 $1,227 ($352)
Anything larger than 2" T & M Actual Cost N/A
WATER & WASTEWATER
158
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 58
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Water Meter Test Fee:
First Test
3/4" Meter $0 $833 ($833)
1" Meter $0 $853 ($853)
1 1/2 " Meter $0 $1,291 ($1,291)
2" Meter $0 $1,292 ($1,292)
Anything larger than 2" $0 Actual Cost N/A
Each Additional Test
3/4" Meter $100 $833 ($733)
1" Meter $100 $853 ($753)
1 1/2 " Meter $100 $1,291 ($1,191)
2" Meter $100 $1,292 ($1,192)
Anything larger than 2" $100 Actual Cost N/A
Water Backflow/Cross Connection Testing:
1" Meter $82 $296 ($214)
1 1/2 " Meter $82 $296 ($214)
2" Meter $82 $296 ($214)
Anything larger than 2" $82 $398 ($316)
Fire Protection Meter $82 $500 ($418)
Backflow Device Installation ‐ Time & Materials T & M Actual Cost N/A Fire Flow Test:
4" - 8" $95 $1,190 ($1,095)
10" and above $95 $1,608 ($1,513)
Installation of Gate Valve Fee:
Installation of Gate Valve Fee $87 $214 ($127)
Installation of Gate Valve Fee - Materials Actual Cost Actual Cost N/A Installation of Angle Valve Fee:
Installation of Angle Valve Fee - 3/4" New $861 N/A
Installation of Angle Valve Fee - 1" New $918 N/A
Water Service Lateral Installation:
3/4" Meter $4,025 $12,238 ($8,213)
1" Meter $4,140 $12,238 ($8,098)
1 1/2" Meter $4,685 $22,519 ($17,834)
2" Meter $4,855 $22,520 ($17,665)
>2" Meter T & M Actual Cost N/A
Construction water meter deposit (hydrant meter):
3" Water Meter Deposit (Per Meter) $800 $2,700 ($1,900) 4" Water Meter Deposit (Per Meter) $800 $4,048 ($3,248) 6" Water Meter Deposit (Per Meter) $800 $5,400 ($4,600) Sewer Connection Investigation ‐ Dye Check $95 $478 ($383) Trespass/Diversion/Theft of Service:
1st offense $300 $876 ($576)
2nd offense $600 $876 ($276)
Water Plan Review
Building Plan Review
Single-Family Residential New $198 N/A
Commercial New $596 N/A
159
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 59
Fee Name Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Planning Entitlement Reviews New $298 N/A
Engineering Application Support New $198 N/A
Wastewater Fees
FOG (Fats, Oils, and Grease)
Inspection New $121 N/A
Re-Inspection New $121 N/A
Industrial Waste Inspection (incl. Permit) New $500 N/A Industrial Waste Re-Inspection New $297 N/A
Installation of Long-Side Sewer Lateral New T&M N/A
Installation of Short-Side Sewer Lateral New T&M N/A
CCTV Investigation (non-dye testing purposes) New T&M N/A Sewer Main Line Cleaning (non-routine cleaning) New T&M N/A The fees administered by the Water Division generally under-recover the associated costs. The largest under-recovery is for ‘Water Service Lateral Installation - 1 1/2" Meter’ at $17,834. The smallest undercharge is for the ‘Installation of Gate Valve Fee’ at $127.
ANNUAL REVENUE IMPACT
No detailed line-item information is currently tracked for these services; therefore, annual revenue impacts were not calculated.
160
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 60
There are two typical surcharges assessed as part of the development review process – General Plan Maintenance Fee and Technology fee. Currently, the City of Banning assesses both through a Plan Storage, Asset Management, & GIS Maintenance Fee and a Technology Surcharge. The following subsections discuss the calculation of these fees.
GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE FEE
A General Plan Maintenance fee is meant to account for updates to the general plan, zoning ordinance, housing elements, and other long-range planning activities that are part of the larger General Plan.
The General Plan Maintenance fee is governed by Government Code Section 66014(b) which states that fees “may include the costs reasonably necessary to prepare and revise the plans and policies that a local agency is required to adopt before it can make any necessary findings and recommendations.” This code states that fees can be charged against zoning changes, zoning variances, use permits, building inspections, and filing applications.
More typically, the fee is charged during the building permit phase to ensure any development project, which gets to that phase, makes enough of an impact to require the need for an update to the Zoning Code or the General Plan. This fee should only be applied to major building permits (i.e., new or remodel / tenant improvements) rather than standalone permits, such as, water heaters or electrical outlets.
The project team estimated the cost associated with conducing a general plan update and annualized it over the life of the general plan. The annual cost to estimate to the City for updating their general plan is roughly $125,000.
The City currently assesses their fee as a flat rate. The project team recommends that the fee be assessed as a percentage of the building permit revenue to allow for the strongest nexus. Due to this, the project team took the annual cost and divided it by the building permit revenue for new construction and tenant improvements. The following table shows this calculation:
TABLE 20: GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE FEE CALCULATION
Category Valuation
Total Annual Cost $125,000
New Construction Building Permit Revenue $1,816,060
General Plan Maintenance Fee 6.88%
The calculated General Plan Maintenance Fee is 6.88% of the Building Permit fee. Below is a comparison of the calculated fee to the City’s current fee.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SURCHARGES
161
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 61
TABLE 21: GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE FEE – CURRENT FEE AND TOTAL COST Fee Current Fee Total Cost
General Plan Update $75.00 per permit 6.88%
Due to the change in how the fee is administered it is difficult to compare the current fee to the full cost calculated.
As part of this analysis, the project team conducted a comparative survey of other local jurisdictions and their assessment of a General Plan Maintenance Fee. Like other comparative efforts, the survey below simply shows the fees charged by the jurisdiction and does not include the basis upon which the other jurisdictions calculated or developed their fee. The following table shows the results of this comparative analysis:
TABLE 22: GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE FEE – COMPARATIVE SURVEY Jurisdiction Fee Amount
Beaumont N/A
Colton 1.25% of Permit Fee
Desert Hot Springs 5% of Permit Fee
Palm Desert N/A
Palm Springs 0.07% of Valuation
Redlands $0.10/s.f.
Riverside 10% of Permit Fee
Yucaipa N/A
The proposed methodology of 6.88% of permit fees would put the fee in alignment with Desert Hot Springs and below Riverside.
TECHNOLOGY SURCHARGE FEE
A Technology Fee allows a jurisdiction to support the costs associated with its permitting system, staff time for managing the systems, acquiring the system, mobile devices used for permitting, etc. The project team used the estimated replacement costs for the software system divided by the lifecycle of the system to calculate the annual permit-related technology costs. The estimated annual costs are approximately $200,000. The City currently assesses technology fees based on a percentage of the permit fee. To calculate the fee in that manner, the project team took the annual software cost and divided it by the anticipated permit-based revenue for all divisions that would utilize the system. The following table shows this calculation:
TABLE 23: TECHNOLOGY SURCHARGE CALCULATION
Category Valuation
Total Annual Cost $200,000
Total Permit Fee Cost $3,329,218
Technology Fee 6%
162
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 62
The calculated technology fee would be 6% of the permit or project fee. Therefore, if a permit was $100, the fee would be $6.00, and if it was a $1,000, the permit fee would be $60. This allows the fee to scale depending on the project and is applicable to more than just Building or Fire Prevention. Below is a comparison of the calculated fee to the City’s current fee, and the associated difference.
TABLE 24: TECHNOLOGY SURCHARGE – CURRENT FEE AND TOTAL COST Fee Current Fee Total Cost Difference
Technology Surcharge 2.50% 6% (3.50%)
Based on the City’s current fee, the City under-recovers by 3.50% for its technology fee.
As part of this analysis, the project team conducted a comparative survey of other local jurisdictions and their assessment of a Technology Fee. Like other comparative efforts, the survey below simply shows the fees charged by the jurisdiction and does not include the basis upon which the other jurisdictions calculated or developed their fee. The following table shows the results of this comparative analysis:
TABLE 25: TECHNOLOGY SURCHARGE – COMPARATIVE SURVEY
Jurisdiction Fee Amount
Beaumont 3.29% of Permit Fee
Colton N/A
Desert Hot Springs 5% of Permit Fee
Palm Desert N/A
Palm Springs 0.109% of Valuation
Redlands N/A
Riverside 4% of Permit Fee
Yucaipa N/A
The surveyed jurisdictions charge fees similar to the way Banning currently charges its fee. The full cost fee of 6% of permit fees would put the fee higher than those in Desert Hot Springs and Riverside.
SURCHARGE FUND BEST PRACTICES
It is a best practice to collect and account for General Plan Maintenance and Technology surcharges in separate accounts, as doing so ensures compliance with funding requirements, enables appropriate allocation of funds to general plan or technology-related activities, and mitigates any potential issues with the comingling of funds. The City should consider tracking their General Plan Maintenance and Technology revenue and expenditures in a separate fund from the General Fund or a separate subaccount within the General Fund.
163
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 63
The following sections provide guidance regarding how and where to increase fees, determine annual update factors, and develop cost recovery policies and procedures.
FEE ADJUSTMENTS
This study has documented and outlined on a fee-by-fee basis where the City is under- and overcollecting for its fee-related services. City and Department management will now need to review the study results and adjust fees per Departmental and City philosophies and policies. The following dot points outline the major options the City has in adjusting its fees:
• Over-Collection: Upon review of the fees that were shown to be over-collecting for costs of services provided, the City should reduce the current fee to be in line with the full cost of providing the service. • Full Cost Recovery: For fees that show an under-collection for costs of services provided, the City may decide to increase the fee to full cost recovery immediately. • Phased Increase: For fees with significantly low-cost recovery levels, or which would have a significant impact on the community, the City could choose to increase fees gradually over a set period.
The City will need to review the results of the fee study and associated cost recovery levels and determine how best to adjust fees. While decisions regarding fees that currently show an over-recovery are straightforward, the following subsections provide further detail on why and how the City should consider either implementing Full Cost Recovery or a Phased Increase approach to adjusting its fees.
FULL COST RECOVERY
Based on the permit or review type, the City may wish to increase the fee to cover the full cost of providing services. Certain permits may be close to cost recovery already, and an increase to full cost may not be significant. Other permits may have a more significant increase associated with full cost recovery.
Increasing fees associated with permits and services that are already close to full cost recovery can potentially bring a Department’s overall cost recovery level higher. Often, these minimal increases can provide necessary revenue to counterbalance fees that cannot be increased.
The City should consider increasing fees for permits for which services are rarely engaged to full cost recovery. These services often require specific expertise and can involve more complex research and review due to their infrequent nature. As such, setting these fees at full cost recovery will ensure that when the permit or review is requested, the City is recovering the full cost of its services.
COST RECOVERY CONSIDERATIONS
164
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 64
PHASED INCREASES
Depending on current cost recovery levels, some current fees may need to be increased significantly to comply with established or proposed cost recovery policies. Due to the type of permit or review or the amount by which a fee needs to be increased, it may be best for the City to use a phased approach to reaching its cost recovery goals.
As an example, you may have a current fee of $200 with a full cost of $1,000, representing 20% cost recovery. If the current policy is 80% cost recovery, the current fee would need to increase by $600, bringing the fee to $800, to comply with proposed recovery levels. Assuming this service is something the City provides quite often and affects various members of the community, an instant increase of $600 may not be feasible. Therefore, the City could take a phased approach, whereby it increases the fee annually over a set period until cost recovery is achieved.
Raising fees over a set period not only allows the City to monitor and control the impact to applicants but also ensure that applicants have time to adjust to significant increases. Continuing with the example above, the City could increase the fee by $150 per year for the next four years, spreading out the increase. Depending on the desired overall increase and the impact to applicants, the City could choose to vary the number of years by which it chooses to increase fees. However, the project team recommends that the City not phase increases for periods greater than five years, as that is the maximum window after which a comprehensive fee assessment should be completed.
ANNUAL ADJUSTMENTS
Conducting a comprehensive analysis of fee-related services and costs annually would be quite cumbersome and costly. The general recommendation is that a comprehensive fee analysis should be conducted every three to five years. This allows jurisdictions to ensure they account for organizational changes, such as staffing levels and merit increases, and process efficiencies, code or rule changes, or technology improvements. Developing annual update mechanisms allow jurisdictions to maintain current levels of cost recovery, while accounting for increases in staffing or expenditures related to permit services. The two most common types of update mechanisms are Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) factors. The following points provide further detail on each of these mechanisms:
• COLA / Personnel Cost Factor: Jurisdictions often provide their staff with annual salary adjustments to account for increases in local cost of living. These increases are not tied to merit or seniority but rather meant to offset rising costs associated with housing, gas, and other livability factors.
Sometimes these factors vary depending on the bargaining group of a specific employee. Generally, these factors are around two or three percent annually. • CPI / ECI Factor: A common method of increasing fees or cost is to look at regional cost indicators, such as the Consumer Price Index or Employment Cost Index. These factors are calculated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, are put out at various intervals within a year, and are specific to states and regions.
165
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 65
The City of Banning should review its current options internally (COLA) as well as externally (CPI / ECI) to determine which option better reflects the goals of the Departments and the City. If choosing a CPI / ECI factor, the City should outline which CPI / ECI should be used, including specific region and adoption date. If choosing an internal factor, the City should be sure to specify which factor if multiple exist.
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
This study has identified areas where the City is under-collecting the costs associated with providing services. This known funding gap is therefore being subsidized by other City revenue sources.
Development of cost recovery policies and procedures will ensure that current and future decision makers understand how and why fees were determined and set, as well as provide a road map for ensuring consistency when moving forward. The following subsections outline typical cost recovery levels and discuss the benefits of developing target cost recovery goals and procedures for achieving and increasing cost recovery.
TYPICAL COST RECOVERY
The Matrix Consulting Group has extensive experience in analyzing local government operations across the United States and has calculated typical cost recovery ranges. The following table outlines cost recovery ranges by major service area.
TABLE 26: TYPICAL COST RECOVERY RANGES BY MAJOR SERVICE AREA Service Areas Typical Cost Recovery Ranges
Building 80-100%
Engineering 80-100%
Parks and Recreation 20-50%
Planning 50-80%
Information presented in the table above is based on the Matrix Consulting Group’s experience in analyzing local governments’ operations across the United States and within California and reflects typical cost recovery ranges observed by local adopting authorities. The following graph depicts how Banning compares to industry cost recovery range standards. 166
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 66
All of the divisions are all within the typical cost recovery range.
DEVELOPMENT OF COST RECOVERY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
The City should review the current cost recovery levels and adopt a formal policy regarding cost recovery.
This policy can be general in nature and can apply broadly to the City as a whole or to each department and division specifically. A department-specific cost recovery policy would allow the City to better control the cost recovery associated with different types of services being provided and the community benefit received.
93%
83%
39%
68%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Building Engineering Parks & Recreation Planning
Cost Recovery %
Current Revenue Cost Recovery vs. Typical Revenue Cost Recovery Typical Cost Recovery Current Cost Recovery
167
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 67
As part of the Cost of Services (User Fee) study for the City of Banning, Matrix Consulting Group conducted a comparative survey of user fees. The City identified eight municipalities to be included in the comparative survey: Beaumont, Colton, Desert Hot Springs, Palm Desert, Palm Springs, Redlands, Riverside, and Yucaipa. The project team then reviewed public documents (i.e., agenda items, staff reports, budgets, fee schedules, and ordinances) and or contacted jurisdictions to get comparative information.
While this full report provides the City with a reasonable estimate and understanding of the true costs of providing services, many jurisdictions also wish to benchmark themselves against other comparable jurisdictions to understand the local “rates” for comparable services. This type of comparative analysis allows for the City to assess what types of changes in fee levels their community can bear. However, benchmarking does not provide adequate information regarding the relationship of other jurisdiction’s costs to their fees (i.e., policy decisions to subsidize, cost recovery goals, etc.). To contextualize this portion of the analysis, the project team provided economic and recency factors for the comparable jurisdictions.
The following sections detail various factors to consider when reviewing comparative survey results, as well as graphical comparisons of current fees and total calculated costs for various permits issued or services provided by the City.
ECONOMIC FACTORS
To provide additional context to the comparative survey information, the project team collected economic factors for the jurisdictions included. Three important economic factors to consider when comparing fees across multiple jurisdictions are: population, budget, and workforce size. These factors can impact how and when fees are administered, as a jurisdiction with a smaller population may choose to not charge a fee, or a smaller workforce size may inhibit their ability to administer a fee.
The following tables rank each jurisdiction from smallest to largest for each of these economic factors:
TABLE 27: RANKING OF JURISDICTIONS BY POPULATION
Jurisdiction Population10
Banning 31,949
Desert Hot Springs 33,262
Palm Springs 44,476
Palm Desert 51,980
Colton 53,278
Yucaipa 54,838
10 California Finance estimates as of 1/1/2025 were used to determine each jurisdiction’s population.
APPENDIX – COMPARATIVE SURVEY
168
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 68
Jurisdiction Population10
Beaumont 59,708
Redlands 73,488
Riverside 320,337
TABLE 28: RANKING OF JURISDICTIONS BY CITYWIDE TOTAL BUDGET Jurisdiction FY25-26 Budget11
Yucaipa $85,321,266
Beaumont $92,546,332
Desert Hot Springs $108,379,566
Redlands $133,374,886
Banning $161,805,963
Palm Springs $186,533,002
Palm Desert $224,897,237
Colton $244,076,225
Riverside $1,338,673,492
TABLE 29: RANKING OF JURISDICTIONS BY FTE
Jurisdiction FY25-26 Authorized FTE
Yucaipa 85
Redlands 140
Desert Hot Springs 144
Banning 248
Palm Desert 253
Beaumont 279
Colton 360
Palm Springs 668
Riverside 2,737
When compared to the surveyed jurisdictions, the City of Banning ranks near the bottom in terms of population, and in the middle for budget and staffing.
RECENCY FACTOR
While the above comparative information can provide some perspective when paralleling Banning’s fees with surveyed jurisdictions, other key factors to consider are when a jurisdiction’s fee schedule was last updated and when the last comprehensive analysis was undertaken. It is important to note that even though jurisdictions may have conducted recent fee studies, their fees are not always adopted at full 11 To ensure appropriate comparisons, full operating budget (all funds) has been used for all jurisdictions. 169
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 69
cost recovery. The comparative results only show the adopted fee for the surveyed jurisdiction, not necessarily the full cost associated with the comparable service.
The following tables detail when each surveyed jurisdiction last conducted a fee analysis and when they last updated their fee schedule:
TABLE 30: LAST FEE SCHEDULE UPDATE
Jurisdiction Response
Riverside 2025
Colton 2024
Redlands 2023
Beaumont 2023
Yucaipa 2023
Palm Springs 2023
Desert Hot Springs 2021
Palm Desert 2014
TABLE 31: LAST FEE STUDY CONDUCTED
Jurisdiction Response
Desert Hot Springs 2024
Redlands 2020
Beaumont 2023
Yucaipa 2022
Palm Springs 2022
Colton 2020
Riverside N/A
Palm Desert N/A
With the exception of Desert Hot Springs and Riverside, all surveyed jurisdictions have not published an updated fee schedule within the last year. Additionally, all the jurisdictions have conducted a fee study within the last five years. The city of Santa Ana and the city of Riverside does not have available data on their most recent fee study.
ADDITIONAL FACTORS
Along with keeping the statistics outlined in the previous sections in mind, the following issues should also be noted regarding the use of market surveys in the setting of fees for service:
• Cost Recovery Factors: Each jurisdiction and its fees are different, and many are not based on the actual cost of providing services as various policy decisions may subsidize services. • Fee Variance Factors: The same “fee” with the same name may include different steps or subactivities. Jurisdictions also provide varying levels of service and have varying levels of costs associated with providing services such as staffing levels, salary levels, indirect overhead costs, etc.
170
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 70
In addition to the issues noted, market surveys can also run the risk of creating a confusing excess of data that will obscure rather than clarify policy issues. Because each jurisdiction is different, the Matrix Consulting Group recommends that the information contained in the market comparison of fees be used as a secondary decision-making tool, rather than the primary method for determining an acceptable price point for services.
COMPARATIVE SURVEY RESULTS
As part of this study, the project team conducted a survey of how the City’s current user fees and calculated full cost compare to other identified jurisdictions. The following subsections provide a comparative look at several fee-related services provided by the City versus the surveyed jurisdictions.
HEATER - REPLACEMENT
Building currently charges a fee of $216 for a replacement heater. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $234. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions.
Banning’s current fee is most comparable to Redlands fee of $220. Banning’s full cost calculated is the highest fee and is above the jurisdictional average of $117. Desert Hot Springs charges the lowest for this fee at $61.
DEMOLITION OF BUILDING
Building currently charges a fee of $408 for the demolition of a building. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $904. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions. $0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
Banning -
Current Fee
Banning -
Full Cost
Beaumont Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm Desert Palm
Springs
Redlands Riverside Yucaipa
Water Heater - Replacement
Fee Average
171
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 71
Banning’s current fee is the second highest fee, above Colton ($400). Their full cost calculated is the highest and is above the jurisdictional average of $267. Desert Hot Springs charges the lowest for this fee at $75.
POOL / SPA - RESIDENTIAL
Building currently charges a fee of $484 for plan check and inspection of a residential pool or spa.
Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $853. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions. $0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
$1,000
Banning -
Current Fee
Banning -
Full Cost
Beaumont Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm
Desert
Palm
Springs
Redlands Riverside Yucaipa
Demolition of Building
Fee Average
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
Banning -
Current Fee
Banning -
Full Cost
Beaumont Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm Desert Palm
Springs
Redlands Riverside Yucaipa
Pool / Spa - Residential
Fee Average
172
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 72
Banning’s current fee is right below the jurisdictional average of $486. The full cost calculated is the highest and is most comparable with Redlands ($639). Desert Hot Springs and Palm Desert both charge the lowest for this fee at $318.
RE-ROOF - SFD
Building currently charges a fee of $330 for plan check and inspection of a single family dwelling re-roof.
Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $333. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions.
Banning’s current fee is the second highest fee and is above the jurisdictional average of $224. The full cost calculated is most comparable with Redlands’ fee of $383.
SIGN - WALL
Building currently charges a fee of $279 for plan check and inspection of a Wall Sign. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $467. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions. $0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
$450
Banning -
Current Fee
Banning -
Full Cost
Beaumont Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm Desert Palm
Springs
Redlands Riverside Yucaipa
Re-roof - SFD
Fee Average
173
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 73
Banning’s current fee is most comparable with Palm Springs fee of $294. Banning’s full cost calculated is the highest and is above the jurisdictional average of $199. Riverside charges the lowest for this fee at $89.
COMMERICAL NEW: 20,000 SQ. FT.
Building currently charges a fee of $7,645 for plan checking and inspecting a new 20,000-square-foot commercial building, valued at $3 million. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $11,640. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions.
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
$450
$500
Banning -
Current Fee
Banning - Full
Cost
Beaumont Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm Desert Palm Springs Redlands Riverside Yucaipa
Sign - Wall
Fee Average
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
Banning -
Current
Fee
Banning -
Full Cost
Beaumont Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm
Desert
Palm
Springs
Redlands Riverside Yucaipa
Commerical New: 20,000 sq. ft.
Fee Average
174
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 74
Banning's current fee of $7,645 is significantly lower than most jurisdictions, with Palm Springs' fee of $3,084 being the lowest. Banning's full cost of $11,640 is below the jurisdictional average of $15,504.
The highest fee is from Desert Hot Springs at $30,219.
COMMERCIAL TI: 1,250 SQ. FT.
Building currently charges a fee of $2,675 for plan checking and inspecting a 1,250-square-footage commercial tenant improvement and valued at 275,000. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $4,311. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions.
Banning's current fee of $2,675 is just under the jurisdictional average of $2,981, with Colton's fee of $2,329 being the most comparable. Banning's full cost of is significantly higher than its current fee and above the jurisdictional average. Palm Desert charges the lowest fee at $688, while Desert Hot Springs charges the highest at $4,850.
RESIDENTIAL NEW: 2,000 SQ. FT.
Building currently charges a fee of $3,328 for plan checking and inspecting a 2,000-square-footage new residential building, valued at $500,000. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $4,580. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions.
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
Banning -
Current Fee
Banning -
Full Cost
Beaumont Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm
Desert
Palm
Springs
Redlands Riverside Yucaipa
Commercial TI: 1,250 sq. ft.
Fee Average
175
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 75
Banning's current fee is below the jurisdictional average of $4,751, with Palm Springs' fee of $3,372 being the most comparable. Banning's full cost of is also below the jurisdictional average but is still higher than its current fee. The highest fee is from Desert Hot Springs at $7,719, while the lowest is from Riverside at $2,160.
RESIDENTIAL REMODEL: 500 SQ. FT.
Building currently charges a fee of $1,620 for plan checking and inspecting a 500-square-footage residential remodel, valued at $30,000. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $1,812. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions.
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
Banning -
Current Fee
Banning -
Full Cost
Beaumont Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm
Desert
Palm
Springs
Redlands Riverside Yucaipa
Residential New: 2,000 sq. ft.
Fee Average
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
Banning -
Current Fee
Banning -
Full Cost
Beaumont Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm
Desert
Palm
Springs
Redlands Riverside Yucaipa
Residential Remodel: 500 sq. ft.
Fee Average
176
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 76
Banning's current fee is slightly above the jurisdictional average of $1,486, with Colton's fee of $1,742 being the most comparable. Banning's full cost of $1,812 is also above the average and is the third highest fee overall. The highest fee is from Beaumont at $3,589, while the lowest is from Redlands at $733.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
Engineering currently charges a fee of $2,531 for a Tentative Tract Map. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $8,715. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions.
Banning's current fee is well below the jurisdictional average of $7,480, with Palm Desert's fee of $3,308 being the most comparable. Banning's full cost is above the jurisdictional average. The highest fee is from Redlands at $12,493, while the lowest is from Colton at $1,544.
STREET VACATION
Engineering currently charges a fee of $435 for a Street Vacation. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $5,250. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions.
$-
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
Banning -
Current Fee
Banning -
Full Cost
Beaumont Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm
Desert
Palm
Springs
Redlands Riverside Yucaipa
Tentative Tract Map
Fee Average
177
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 77
Banning's current fee is significantly below the jurisdictional average of $4,092, with Colton's fee of $1,951 being the most comparable. Banning's full cost is above the jurisdictional average. The highest fee is from Riverside at $12,189, while the lowest is from Banning's current fee at $435.
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
Engineering currently charges a fee of $619 for a Lot Line Adjustment. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $5,250. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions.
Banning's current fee is significantly below the jurisdictional average of $2,319, with Redlands' fee of $706 being the most comparable. Banning's full cost is well above the jurisdictional average and is the highest fee listed. The second lowest fee is from Redlands at $706. $-
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
Banning -
Current Fee
Banning -
Full Cost
Beaumont Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm
Springs
Redlands Riverside Yucaipa
Street Vacation
Fee Average
$-
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
Banning -
Current Fee
Banning -
Full Cost
Beaumont Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm
Springs
Redlands Riverside Yucaipa
Lot Line Adjustment
Fee Average
178
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 78
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
Engineering currently charges a fee of $352 for an Encroachment Permit. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $1,643. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions.
Banning's current fee is above the jurisdictional average of $281, with Yucaipa's fee of $309 being the most comparable. Banning's full cost is the highest fee listed and is significantly above the jurisdictional average. The lowest fee is from Beaumont at $60.
NEW 13, 13R FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM
Fire currently charges a fee of $732 for a New 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System plan check and inspection (per sprinkler head) with 10 heads. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $819. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions.
$-
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
$1,800
Banning -
Current
Fee
Banning -
Full Cost
Beaumont Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm
Springs
Redlands Riverside Yucaipa
Encroachment Permit
Fee Average
$-
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
Banning -
Current Fee
Banning -
Full Cost
Beaumont Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm Desert Palm
Springs
Redlands Riverside Yucaipa
New 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler
Fee Average
179
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 79
Banning's current fee is slightly above the jurisdictional average of $699. Banning's full cost is also above the jurisdictional average and is the second-highest fee listed. The highest fee is from Colton at $1,141, while the lowest is from Palm Desert at $476.
TI FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
Fire currently charges a fee of $487 for a Tenant Improvement Fire Alarm System Plan Check and Inspection (per initiating or notification device) with 2 devices. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $527. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions.
Banning's current fee is well below the jurisdictional average of $779, with Redlands' fee of $514 being the most comparable. Banning's full cost is also below the jurisdictional average. The highest fee is from Colton at $1,712, while the lowest is from Riverside at $380.
FIRE PUMP
Fire currently charges a fee of $1,040 for a plan check and inspection for a fire pump. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $1,089. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions. $-
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
$1,800
Banning -
Current
Fee
Banning -
Full Cost
Beaumont Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm
Desert
Palm
Springs
Redlands Riverside Yucaipa
TI Fire Alarm System
Fee Average
180
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 80
Banning's current fee is above the jurisdictional average of $982. Banning's full cost is also above the average, with Colton's fee of $1,427 being the next highest. The highest fee is from Palm Desert at $2,130, while the lowest is from Redlands at $497.
HOOD AND DUCT EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM
Fire currently charges a fee of $568 for a plan check and inspection of a Hood and Duct Extinguishing System. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $592. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions.
Both Banning's current fee and full cost calculated are above the jurisdictional average of $511 and are most comparable to Palm Springs fee of $506. The highest fee is from Colton at $856, while the lowest is from Palm Desert at $238.
SPECIAL EVENT
Fire currently charges a fee of $378 for a special event with tents or canopies and is less than 400 square feet. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $411. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions. $-
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
Banning -
Current
Fee
Banning -
Full Cost
Beaumont Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm
Desert
Palm
Springs
Redlands Riverside Yucaipa
Fire Pump
Fee Average
$-
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
Banning - Current
Fee
Banning - Full Cost Beaumont Colton Desert Hot Springs Palm Desert Palm Springs Redlands Riverside Yucaipa Hood and Duct Extinguishing System
Fee Average
181
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 81
Banning's current fee is slightly above the jurisdictional average of $361, with Yucaipa's fee of $381 being the most comparable. Banning's full cost is also above the jurisdictional average. The highest fee is from Beaumont at $600, while the lowest is from Redlands at $231.
COMMUNITY CENTER - SMALL MEETING ROOM
Parks and Recreation currently charges a fee of $60 for a rental of the Community Center - Small Meeting Room for 1 hour. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $132.
The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions.
Banning's current fee and full cost is below the jurisdictional average of $225. Palm Springs charges a $367 deposit and Redlands charges a $216 deposit. It’s full cost is lower than Redlands and Palm Springs community rental rates.
$-
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
Banning -
Current Fee
Banning -
Full Cost
Beaumont Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm
Desert
Palm
Springs
Redlands Yucaipa
Special Event
Fee Average
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
Banning - Current
Fee
Banning - Full Cost Palm Springs Redlands Riverside
Community Center - Small Meeting Room
Fee Average
182
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 82
SENIOR CENTER - MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM
Parks and Recreation currently charges a fee of $90 for a rental of the Senior Center - Multi-Purpose Room for 4 hours. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $152.
The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions.
Banning's current and full cost fee is below the jurisdictional average of $326. Palm Springs charges a $531 deposit and Redlands charges a $308 deposit.
PICNIC SHELTER
Parks and Recreation currently charges a fee of $30 for a Picnic Shelter rental. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $35. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions. $0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
Banning - Current
Fee
Banning - Full Cost Palm Springs Redlands Riverside
Senior Center - Multi-Purpose Room
Fee Average
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
Banning - Current Fee Banning - Full Cost Palm Springs Redlands Riverside Picnic Shelter
Fee Average
183
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 83
Banning's current and full cost fees are well below the jurisdictional average of $148. It’s current and full cost fees are in alignment with the City of Redlands.
APPEAL OF PLANNING DEPT. DECISION
Planning currently charges a fee of $3,624 for an appeal of a planning department decision. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $5,673. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions.
Banning's current fee is well above the jurisdictional average of $1,745 and is the highest current fee listed. Banning's full cost of $5,673 is the highest fee overall and is more than double the jurisdictional average. The lowest fee is from Palm Desert at $276, while the second highest fee is from Riverside at $2,719.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - MINOR
Planning currently charges a fee of $4,888 for minor conditional use permit. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $3,143. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions. $0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
Banning -
Current Fee
Banning -
Full Cost
Beaumont Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm Desert Palm
Springs
Redlands Riverside Yucaipa
Appeal of Planning Dept. Decision
Fee Average
184
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 84
Banning's current fee is close to the jurisdictional average of $4,992. Banning's full cost is well below the jurisdictional average. The highest fee is from Yucaipa at $10,740, while the lowest is from Redlands at $1,066. Beaumont's fee of $5,000 is charged as a deposit.
FINAL TRACT MAP - FIRST 50 LOTS: 10 LOTS
Planning currently charges a fee of $1,569 for a Final Tract Map with 10 lots. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $1,701. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions.
Banning's current fee is well below the jurisdictional average of $4,193, with Desert Hot Springs' fee of $1,255 and Yucaipa's fee of $1,277 being the most comparable. Banning's full cost is also well below the jurisdictional average. The highest fee is from Riverside at $11,305, while the lowest is from Desert Hot Springs at $1,255. Beaumont's fee of $7,500 is charged as a deposit. $0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
Banning -
Current Fee
Banning -
Full Cost
Beaumont Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm
Desert
Palm
Springs
Redlands Riverside Yucaipa
Conditional Use Permit - Minor
Fee Average
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
Banning -
Current Fee
Banning -
Full Cost
Beaumont Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm Desert Palm
Springs
Redlands Riverside Yucaipa
Final Tract Map - First 50 Lots: 10 lots
Fee Average
185
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 85
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT - MAJOR
Planning currently charges a fee of $1,103 for a major temporary use permit. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $2,454. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions.
Banning's current fee of $1,103 is just below the jurisdictional average of $1,252, with Riverside's fee of $1,102 and Yucaipa's fee of $1,243 being the most comparable. Banning's full cost of $2,454 is well above the jurisdictional average. The highest fee is from Colton at $2,670, while the lowest is from Palm Desert at $87.
VARIANCE
Planning currently charges a fee of $4,423 for a variance fee. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $6,111. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions.
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
Banning -
Current Fee
Banning -
Full Cost
Beaumont Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm Desert Palm
Springs
Redlands Riverside Yucaipa
Temporary Use Permit - Major
Fee Average
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
Banning -
Current Fee
Banning -
Full Cost
Beaumont Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm
Desert
Palm
Springs
Redlands Riverside Yucaipa
Variance
Fee Average
186
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 86
Banning's current fee of $4,423 is significantly above the jurisdictional average of $3,367. Banning's full cost of $6,111 is the second-highest fee overall and is also well above the jurisdictional average. The highest fee is from Yucaipa at $7,200, while the lowest is from Colton at $1,800.
VEHICLE STORAGE RELEASE
Police currently charges a fee of $115 for a Vehicle Storage Release. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $126. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions.
Banning's current fee of $115 is below the jurisdictional average of $132, with Banning's full cost of $126 being the most comparable. Banning's full cost is also just below the jurisdictional average. The highest fee is from Redlands at $258, while the lowest is from Palm Springs at $56.
LIVESCAN FINGERPRINT
Police currently charges a fee of $15 for a Livescan Fingerprint fee. Through this study, the project team calculated the full cost of this service to be $48. The following graph shows how Banning’s current fee and full cost compare to the surveyed jurisdictions.
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
Banning - Current
Fee
Banning - Full Cost Colton Desert Hot
Springs
Palm Springs Redlands Riverside
Vehicle Storage Release
Fee Average
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
Banning - Current
Fee
Banning - Full Cost Colton Desert Hot Springs Palm Springs Redlands Riverside Livescan Fingerprint
Fee Average
187
BANNING COMPREHENSIVE FEE STUDY REPORT
MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP 87
Banning's current fee is well below the jurisdictional average of $36, with Colton's fee of $20 being the most comparable. Banning's full cost is higher than the jurisdictional average. The highest fee is from Desert Hot Springs at $57, while the lowest is from Banning's current fee at $15.
SUMMARY
Overall, Banning generally has current fees that are higher or in the middle when compared to the fees of the other surveyed jurisdictions. Of the surveyed jurisdictions, Banning’s current fees are most comparable with Redlands, while the City’s full cost calculated is most comparable to fees charged by Riverside. It is important to note that the results of this survey only show the fees adopted by the council, not the cost recovery policy decisions for departments or a jurisdiction. As such, the results of this survey should be used as a secondary decision-making tool. 188
City of Banning Master Fee Schedule
Fee Name Unit Current Fee Total Cost Recommended Fee Fee Type
BUILDING
Flat Fees
Administrative Services for Applications Not Listed Per Hour New $174 $174 User Fee Administrative Charge for Consultant Services % of Consultant Fees 10% 15% 15% User Fee Air handling / heating or cooling unit replacement Each $193 $254 $254 User Fee Balcony / deck:
Balcony / deck Each $491 $567 $491 User Fee
Railing repair Each $297 $567 $567 User Fee
Carport:
Custom Each $944 $1,117 $1,117 User Fee
ICC, IAPMO, handout Each $491 $659 $659 User Fee
Cell Tower:
Modifications Each $401 $1,117 $1,117 User Fee
New Each $1,418 $1,876 $1,876 User Fee
Change of occupancy Each $417 $2,680 $834 User Fee
Demolition of building Each Building $408 $904 $680 User Fee Electric panel replacement Each $193 $283 $283 User Fee Exterior wall covering replacement (up to 400 s.f.) Each $422 $458 $458 User Fee Fireplace:
Custom Each $583 $744 $744 User Fee
Pre‐fabricated with engineering Each $548 $744 $744 User Fee Flag pole (over 20' in height) Each $645 $473 $473 User Fee Grease trap/ interceptor Each $330 $602 $602 User Fee
Hood:
Other than Type 1 (including ducts) Each $492 $602 $602 User Fee Type 1 (includes exhaust system) Each $629 $995 $830 User Fee Inspections:
Inspection Fee Per Hour $183 $196 $196 User Fee
Re‐Inspection Each $183 $196 $196 User Fee
Job card ‐ replace / duplicate Each $55 $87 $87 User Fee Lighting pole:
Up to 6 poles Base $783 $853 $853 User Fee
6+ Poles Additional Each Pole $173 $144 $144 User Fee
Manufactured home ‐ installation on private property Each $538 $1,109 $1,109 User Fee Modular unit ‐ installation on private property Each $659 $1,109 $1,109 User Fee Patio:
Patio cover
Patio cover ‐ custom Each $515 $930 $930 User Fee
Patio cover ‐ handout Each $256 $659 $659 User Fee
Patio enclosure Each $561 $930 $930 User Fee
Plan check:
189
Plan check Each $162 $183 $183 User Fee
Plan check ‐ Structural Engineer Each $292 $274 $274 User Fee Additional plan review Hour $162 $183 $183 User Fee
Additional plan review ‐ Engineering Hour $292 $183 $183 User Fee Pool/Spa
Commercial Each $1,192 $2,453 $2,268 User Fee
Residential Each Modified $853 $853 User Fee
Research Per Hour $110 $174 $174 User Fee
Remodels
Residential bathroom remodel ‐ no structural/wall changes Each $411 $617 $617 User Fee Residential kitchen remodel ‐ no structural/wall changes Each $434 $617 $617 User Fee Re-roof
Commercial Each 3,000 s.f. $330 $400 $400 User Fee
Multifamily Each 3,000 s.f. $330 $382 $382 User Fee
SFD Each Building $330 $333 $333 User Fee
Retrofit foundation for a modular or mobile unit Each $216 $1,109 $1,109 User Fee Sales office ‐ conversion to residential or garage use Each $216 $1,064 $1,064 User Fee Septic tank Each $353 $1,070 $1,070 User Fee
Sign:
Monument Each $677 $982 $982 User Fee
Pole/ billboard Each $869 $1,656 $1,656 User Fee
Wall Each $279 $467 $467 User Fee
Site investigation Each $445 $451 $451 User Fee
Solar:
Commercial
Up to 4 kw Base $383 $1,307 $1,307 User Fee
Each additional kw Each Addl kw $198 $74 $74 User Fee
Ground mount Each $791 $1,124 $1,124 User Fee
Residential
Rooftop (up to 10 kw) Each $423 $554 $554 User Fee
Rooftop (more than 10 kw) Each $596 $698 $698 User Fee
Residential water heater Each $403 $322 $322 User Fee
Special Inspector application Each $55 $174 $174 User Fee Stairs Per Flight $354 $187 $187 User Fee
Storage racks Per 100 lf. $260 $277 $277 User Fee
Temporary construction or sales trailer Each $248 $1,109 $1,109 User Fee Utility release Each $193 $205 $205 User Fee
Walk‐in tub Each $330 $185 $185 User Fee
Wall:
Screen / Freestanding:
Custom Per 50 lf. $537 $1,261 $1,261 User Fee
Handout Per 50 lf. $537 $668 $668 User Fee
Retaining
Custom Per 50 lf. $894 $1,032 $1,032 User Fee
Handout Per 50 lf. $445 $668 $668 User Fee
Water heater replacement Each $216 $234 $234 User Fee
190
Water/gas piping ‐ installation, alteration or repair Each $476 $475 $475 User Fee Window/door replacement ‐ residential, no changes to framing Each $411 $425 $425 User Fee Trade Fees
Electrical Per Permit $267 $299 $299 User Fee
Plumbing Per Permit $267 $299 $299 User Fee
Mechanical Per Permit $267 $299 $299 User Fee
Fees Based on ICC Class, Occupancy, Square Footage, Valuation: Plan Check / Inspection / Permit combined Commercial - New
1,001 - 5,000 SF Base $2,925 $2,957 $2,957 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $26.92 $33.87 $33.87 User Fee 5,001 - 10,000 SF Base $4,002 $4,312 $4,312 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $30.89 $56.50 $56.50 User Fee 10,001 - 20,000 SF Base $5,546 $7,137 $7,137 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $20.99 $45.03 $45.03 User Fee 20,001 - 50,000 SF Base $7,645 $11,640 $11,640 User Fee Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $9.10 $24.88 $24.88 User Fee 50,001 - 100,000 SF Base $10,375 $19,105 $19,105 User Fee Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $6.26 $19.10 $19.10 User Fee 100,001+ SF Base $13,507 $28,656 $28,656 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $8.37 $9.55 $9.55 User Fee Tenant Improvements
1 - 800 SF Base $1,892 $1,912 $1,912 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $47.58 $59.49 $59.49 User Fee 801 - 1,250 SF Base $2,273 $2,388 $2,388 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $89.42 $427.28 $427.28 User Fee 1,251 - 2,500 SF Base $2,675 $4,311 $4,311 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $54.81 $226.04 $226.04 User Fee 2,501 - 5,000 SF Base $3,360 $7,137 $7,137 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $26.97 $80.78 $80.78 User Fee 5,001 - 12,500 SF Base $4,035 $9,156 $9,156 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $9.43 $31.03 $31.03 User Fee 12,501+ SF Base $4,742 $11,483 $11,483 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $12.72 $15.52 $15.52 User Fee Industrial - New
1,001 - 5,000 SF Base $2,632 $2,890 $2,890 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $17.67 $34.69 $34.69 User Fee 5,001 - 10,000 SF Base $3,339 $4,277 $4,277 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $20.01 $42.87 $42.87 User Fee 10,001 -20,000 SF Base $4,339 $6,421 $6,421 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $13.05 $59.29 $59.29 User Fee 20,001 50,000 SF Base $5,644 $12,350 $12,350 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $4.28 $23.56 $23.56 User Fee 50,001 100,000 SF Base $6,927 $19,417 $19,417 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $4.26 $11.85 $11.85 User Fee 100,001+ SF Base $9,059 $25,339 $25,339 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $5.52 $5.92 $5.92 User Fee 191
Residential- New (single or multi family- per dwelling unit) 1 - 800 SF Base $2,512 $2,520 $2,520 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $24.47 $34.76 $34.76 User Fee 801 - 1,200 SF Base $2,708 $2,798 $2,798 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $67.97 $210.88 $210.88 User Fee 1,201 - 2,000 SF Base $2,980 $3,642 $3,642 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $43.50 $117.35 $117.35 User Fee 2,001 - 3,000SF Base $3,328 $4,580 $4,580 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $44.59 $207.76 $207.76 User Fee 3,001 - 4,000 SF Base $3,774 $6,658 $6,658 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $63.08 $147.38 $147.38 User Fee 4,001 6,000 SF Base $4,404 $8,132 $8,132 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $41.33 $116.38 $116.38 User Fee 6,001 - 10,000 SF Base $5,231 $10,459 $10,459 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $23.11 $58.80 $58.80 User Fee 10,001+ SF Base $6,155 $12,812 $12,812 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $31.19 $29.40 $29.40 User Fee Residential- Production Phase
1 - 800 SF Base $2,212 $2,223 $2,223 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $28.00 $30.86 $30.86 User Fee 801 -1,200 SF Base $2,436 $2,470 $2,470 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $7.61 $32.10 $32.10 User Fee 1,201 - 2,000 SF Base $2,466 $2,598 $2,598 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $60.36 $48.88 $48.88 User Fee 2,001 - 3,000 SF Base $2,949 $2,989 $2,989 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $27.19 $49.38 $49.38 User Fee 3,001 - 4,000 SF Base $3,221 $3,483 $3,483 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $53.72 $52.98 $52.98 User Fee 4,001 - 6,000 SF Base $3,758 $4,013 $4,013 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $39.26 $25.66 $25.66 User Fee 6,001 - 10,000 SF Base $4,544 $4,526 $4,526 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $19.25 $16.42 $16.42 User Fee 10,001+ SF Base $5,314 $5,183 $5,183 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $1.27 $5.24 $5.24 User Fee Residential- Addition (single or multi family)
1 - 300 SF Base $1,740 $1,745 $1,745 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $43.50 $92.44 $92.44 User Fee 301 - 500 SF Base $1,871 $2,022 $2,022 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $184.88 $329.77 $329.77 User Fee 501 - 800 SF Base $2,240 $2,681 $2,681 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $101.50 $250.38 $250.38 User Fee 801 -1,500 SF Base $2,545 $3,433 $3,433 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $63.70 $110.39 $110.39 User Fee 1,501 - 2,000 SF Base $2,991 $4,205 $4,205 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $91.35 $189.53 $189.53 User Fee 2,001+ SF Base $3,447 $5,153 $5,153 User Fee
192
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $122.82 $94.77 $94.77 User Fee Residential- Remodel (single or multi family)
1 - 300 SF Base $1,327 $1,351 $1,351 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $18.13 $46.22 $46.22 User Fee 301 -500 SF Base $1,381 $1,490 $1,490 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $119.63 $160.93 $160.93 User Fee 501 - 800 SF Base $1,620 $1,812 $1,812 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $39.88 $188.48 $188.48 User Fee 801 1- 1,500 SF Base $1,740 $2,377 $2,377 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $38.84 $80.18 $80.18 User Fee 1,501 - 2,000 SF Base $2,012 $2,939 $2,939 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $21.67 $169.38 $169.38 User Fee 2,001+ SF Base $2,153 $3,786 $3,786 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $31.08 $33.88 $33.88 User Fee Shell Buildings
1 - 1,000 SF Base $2,708 $2,750 $2,750 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $30.45 $65.58 $65.58 User Fee 1,001 - 5,000 SF Base $3,012 $3,405 $3,405 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $11.15 $43.64 $43.64 User Fee 5,001 - 10,000 SF Base $3,458 $5,151 $5,151 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $15.23 $44.70 $44.70 User Fee 10,001 - 20,000 SF Base $4,220 $7,386 $7,386 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $7.29 $28.73 $28.73 User Fee 20,001 - 50,000 SF Base $4,948 $10,259 $10,259 User Fee Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $3.19 $10.19 $10.19 User Fee 50,001+ SF Base $5,905 $13,315 $13,315 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $4.23 $5.09 $5.09 User Fee Garage/ Storage/ Workshop U Occ Res/Comm
1 - 400 SF Base $1,055 $1,105 $1,105 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $24.47 $58.40 $58.40 User Fee 401 - 600 SF Base $1,153 $1,338 $1,338 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $59.81 $165.92 $165.92 User Fee 601 - 1,000 SF Base $1,272 $1,670 $1,670 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $32.63 $130.43 $130.43 User Fee 1,001 - 1,500 SF Base $1,403 $2,192 $2,192 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $28.28 $96.93 $96.93 User Fee 1,501 - 2,000 SF Base $1,544 $2,676 $2,676 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $63.77 $75.94 $75.94 User Fee 2,001+ SF Base $1,620 $3,056 $3,056 User Fee
Each Addl 100 SF Each Addl 100 SF $84.57 $37.97 $37.97 User Fee Surcharges
General Plan Maintenance Fee % of Permit Fee $75.00 6.88% 6.88% User Fee Technology Surcharge % of Permit Fee 2.50% 6% 6% User Fee Misc Electric: Electric Utility Fees
Panel Upgrade
Single Phase Panel Upgrade up to 225A (120V/240V) - OH Each Variable $2,336 $2,336 User Fee 193
Single Phase Panel Upgrade up to 225A (120V/240V) - UG Each Variable $2,336 $2,336 User Fee Single Phase Panel Upgrade up to 225A (120V/208V) - OH Each Variable $2,336 $2,336 User Fee Single Phase Panel Upgrade up to 225A (120V/208V) - UG Each Variable $2,336 $2,336 User Fee Single Phase Panel Upgrade 225A to 400A (120V/240V) - OH Each Variable $2,449 $2,449 User Fee Single Phase Panel Upgrade 225A to 400A (120V/240V) - UG Each Variable $2,449 $2,449 User Fee Single Phase Panel Upgrade 225A to 400A (120V/208V) - OH Each Variable $2,449 $2,449 User Fee Single Phase Panel Upgrade 225A to 400A (120V/208V) - UG Each Variable $2,449 $2,449 User Fee New Electric Service
Single Phase:
Single Phase Electric Service up to 225A (120V/240V) - OH Each T&M $2,336 $2,336 User Fee Single Phase Electric Service up to 225A (120V/240V) - UG Each T&M $2,336 $2,336 User Fee Single Phase Electric Service up to 225A (120V/208V) - OH Each T&M $2,573 $2,573 User Fee Single Phase Electric Service up to 225A (120V/208V) - UG Each T&M $2,573 $2,573 User Fee Single Phase Electric Service 225A to 400A (120V/240V) - OH Each T&M $2,449 $2,449 User Fee Single Phase Electric Service 225A to 400A (120V/240V) - UG Each T&M $2,449 $2,449 User Fee Single Phase Electric Service 225A to 400A (120V/208V) - OH Each T&M $2,573 $2,573 User Fee Single Phase Electric Service 225A to 400A (120V/208V) - UG Each T&M $2,573 $2,573 User Fee Three Phase:
Three Phase Electric Service 0A to 400A (120V/208V) - OH Each T&M $3,796 $3,796 User Fee Three Phase Electric Service 0A to 400A (120V/208V) - UG Each T&M $3,796 $3,796 User Fee Three Phase Electric Service 0A to 400A (277V/480V) - OH Each T&M $3,796 $3,796 User Fee Three Phase Electric Service 0A to 400A (277V/480V) - UG Each T&M $3,796 $3,796 User Fee Three Phase Electric Service 400A to 800A (277V/480V) - OH Each T&M $3,796 $3,796 User Fee Three Phase Electric Service 400A to 800A (277V/480V) - UG Each T&M $3,796 $3,796 User Fee Three Phase Electric Service 800A to 4000A (277V/480V) - OH Each T&M $4,272 $4,272 User Fee Three Phase Electric Service 800A to 4000A (277V/480V) - UG Each T&M $4,272 $4,272 User Fee Temporary Electrical Service (Construction Purposes ONLY) Single Phase Temporary Electric Service up to 225A (120V/240V) - OH Each T&M $1,484 $1,484 User Fee Single Phase Temporary Electric Service up to 225A (120V/240V) - UG Each T&M $1,484 $1,484 User Fee Distribution Line Extensions
Distribution Line Extension/Relocation (1 to 10 Units) - OH Each Modified $2,987 $2,987 User Fee Distribution Line Extension/Relocation (1 to 10 Units) - UG (Rule 15) Each Modified $2,987 $2,987 User Fee Distribution Line Extension/Relocation (10+ Units) - OH Each Modified $5,975 $5,975 User Fee Distribution Line Extension/Relocation (10+ Units) - UG (Rule 15) Each Modified $5,975 $5,975 User Fee Distribution Line Extension/Relocation OH to UG Conversion (Rule 20) Each Modified $6,473 $6,473 User Fee Service Line Extensions
Service Line Extension/Relocation (1 to 10 Units) - OH Each $1,700 $1,445 $1,445 User Fee Service Line Extension/Relocation (1 to 10 Units) - UG (Rule 16) Each $1,700 $1,445 $1,445 User Fee Service Line Extension/Relocation (10+ Units) - OH Each T&M $2,987 $2,987 User Fee Service Line Extension/Relocation (10+ Units) - UG (Rule 16) Each T&M $2,987 $2,987 User Fee Service Line Extension/Relocation OH to UG Conversion (Rule 20) Each T&M $3,686 $3,686 User Fee Engineering Review / Plan Check
Preliminary Electric Service Assessment Each $238 $1,395 $1,395 User Fee Plan Check:
Basic/Minor Each New $1,271 $1,271 User Fee
Advanced/Major Each New $3,714 $3,714 User Fee
194
Master Subdivision/Subdivision Each New $2,318 $2,318 User Fee Additional Plan Check (After 2nd Review):
Basic/Minor Each $119 $461 $461 User Fee
Advanced/Major Each $119 $1,383 $1,383 User Fee
Master Subdivision/Subdivision Each $119 $922 $922 User Fee Solar Application Review and Plan Check:
Basic/Minor Each $136 $1,897 $1,897 User Fee
Advanced/Major Each $136 $2,647 $2,647 User Fee
Master Subdivision/Subdivision Each $136 $3,236 $3,236 User Fee Additional Solar Plan Check (After 2nd Review):
Basic/Minor Each $61 $666 $666 User Fee
Advanced/Major Each $61 $881 $881 User Fee
Master Subdivision/Subdivision Each $61 $1,030 $1,030 User Fee Distribution Line Extension/Relocation:
1 to 10 Units - Planning Each T&M $1,398 $1,398 User Fee 1 to 10 Units - Engineering Each T&M $698 $698 User Fee 10+ Units - Planning Each T&M $2,796 $2,796 User Fee
10+ Units - Engineering Each T&M $1,397 $1,397 User Fee OH to UG Conversion - Planning Each T&M $2,796 $2,796 User Fee OH to UG Conversion - Engineering Each T&M $1,895 $1,895 User Fee Misc Electric Utility / Penalty Fees
Customer Requested Electric Operations Service Call "Trip Charge" Each $125 $170 $170 User Fee Service Line Disconnection:
Overhead Each $559 $675 $675 User Fee
Underground Each $559 $675 $675 User Fee
Service Line Reconnection:
Overhead Each $262 $675 $675 User Fee
Underground Each $262 $675 $675 User Fee
Distribution Line Disconnection:
Overhead Each New $1,033 $1,033 User Fee
Underground Each New $1,033 $1,033 User Fee
Distribution Line Reconnection:
Overhead Each New $1,271 $1,271 User Fee
Underground Each New $1,271 $1,271 User Fee
Service Turn On:
Single Phase/Commercial Self Cont Remote Each Modified $39 $39 User Fee Single Phase/Commercial Self Cont in the Field Each Modified $197 $197 User Fee 3 Phase Self Cont Each Modified $295 $295 User Fee
Single Phase & 3 Phase CT Rated Each Modified $295 $295 User Fee Site / Panel Investigation Each New $676 $676 User Fee
Meter Test - 2nd Request within One Year:
Single Phase Each $182 $367 $367 User Fee
3 Phase Each $182 $709 $709 User Fee
Meter Changeout - Customer Required:
Single Phase Each $307 $341 $341 User Fee
3 Phase Each $596 $625 $625 User Fee
195
Trespass / Diversion:
1st Offense Each $250 $1,399 $1,399 User Fee
2nd Offense Each $350 $1,399 $1,399 User Fee
Inspections
General Each $153 $676 $676 User Fee
Trench / Conduit Each $153 $795 $795 User Fee
Mandrel Each $153 $795 $795 User Fee
Substructure Each $153 $795 $795 User Fee
Structure / Equipment Each $153 $795 $795 User Fee
Solar:
Single Phase Each $153 $849 $849 User Fee
3 Phase Each $153 $1,077 $1,077 User Fee
ENGINEERING
Land Development Fees
Specific Plan Deposit $3,871 Refer to Planning Deposit Refer to Planning Deposit User Fee Specific Plan Amendment Deposit $2,540 Refer to Planning Deposit Refer to Planning Deposit User Fee E.I.R Deposit $2,862 Refer to Planning Deposit Refer to Planning Deposit User Fee Drainage Study (Preliminary and Final)
Under 10 Acres Each Modified $5,761 $5,761 User Fee
10 Acres or Greater Each Modified $10,711 $10,711 User Fee Revisions Each Modified $2,923 $2,923 User Fee
4th Review (Or Additional) Each Modified $1,862 $1,862 User Fee Water Quality Management Plan (Preliminary and Final)
Under 10 Acres Each Modified $3,609 $3,609 User Fee
10 Acres or Greater Each Modified $5,859 $5,859 User Fee Revisions Each Modified $1,711 $1,711 User Fee
4th Review (Or Additional) Each Modified $1,187 $1,187 User Fee Traffic Study Screening Memo Each New $1,179 $300 User Fee Traffic Study Scoping Agreement Each New $2,164 $2,164 User Fee Traffic Impact Analysis Deposit $2,504 $4,630 $4,630 User Fee Soils Report Each $2,742 $3,373 $3,373 User Fee
Tentative Parcel Map
Base Each $1,843 $8,715 $8,715 User Fee
Per Sheet Per Sheet (max size is 36x48) New $2,250 $2,250 User Fee 4th Review (Or Additional) Per Sheet New $750 $750 User Fee Tentative Tract Map
Base Each $2,531 $8,715 $8,715 User Fee
Per Sheet Per Sheet New $3,375 $3,375 User Fee
4th Review (Or Additional) Per Sheet New $1,125 $1,125 User Fee Site Plan
Residential Each $289 $1,902 $1,902 User Fee
Multi-Family and Other Non-Residential Each $289 $4,501 $4,501 User Fee 4th Review (Or Additional) Per Sheet New $1,500 $1,500 User Fee Preliminary Grading Plan
196
Under 10 Acres Each New $6,814 $6,814 User Fee
10 Acres or Greater Each New $12,650 $12,650 User Fee
Revisions Each New $3,493 $3,493 User Fee
4th Review (Or Additional) Each New $4,053 $4,053 User Fee Utility Site Plan
Under 10 Acres Each New $3,555 $3,555 User Fee
10 Acres or Greater Each New $5,968 $5,968 User Fee
Revisions Each New $1,918 $1,918 User Fee
4th Review (Or Additional) Each New $2,543 $2,543 User Fee Water Supply Verification / Assessment (WSA) Deposit New Actual Cost + 10% Actual Cost + 10% User Fee Sewer Availability Verification / Assessment Deposit New Actual Cost + 10% Actual Cost + 10% User Fee Reclaimed Water Deposit New Actual Cost + 10% Actual Cost + 10% User Fee Sewer Waste Survey Each New $939 $939 User Fee
Conceptual Landscape Plan Review Each New $663 $663 User Fee Flood Zone Development Review Each $705 $2,165 $2,165 User Fee Consultant Service Deposit $184 + Consultant's Fee Actual Cost + 15% Actual Cost + 15% User Fee Final Map/Easement Review
Final Map:
Base Base New $5,186 $5,186 User Fee
Per Lot Per Lot New $300 $300 User Fee
Fourth or Subsequent Review Per Sheet New $689 $689 User Fee Amended Final Map Per Sheet $932 $4,273 $4,273 User Fee Condominium Plan Each $1,023 Actual Cost + 15% Actual Cost + 15% User Fee Certificate of Correction Each $836 $1,049 $1,049 User Fee Certificate of Compliance Each $653 $4,596 $4,596 User Fee Dedication Document (ROW or Easement) Each $224 $5,250 $2,625 User Fee Street Vacation Each $435 $5,250 $2,625 User Fee
Lot Line Adjustment Each $619 $5,250 $2,625 User Fee
Lot Merger Each $619 $5,250 $2,625 User Fee
Consultant Service Deposit $183 + Consultant's Fee Actual Cost + 15% Actual Cost + 15% User Fee Plan Review
Grading:
Base Base Modified $3,209 $3,209 User Fee
Per Sheet Per Sheet Modified $1,045 $1,045 User Fee
Precise Grading:
Base Base Modified $4,254 $4,254 User Fee
Per Sheet Per Sheet Modified $1,913 $1,913 User Fee
Erosion Control (If Separate from Grading Plan):
Base Base New $2,347 $2,347 User Fee
Per Sheet Per Sheet New $300 $300 User Fee
Improvement Plan Review (Street, Signing and Striping, Traffic Signal, Traffic Control, Storm Drain, Channel, Sewer, Water, Non-Potable Water, Landscape):
Base Base Modified $4,949 $4,949 User Fee
Per Sheet Per Sheet Modified $573 $573 User Fee
Plan Revisions:
197
Base Base New $1,154 $1,154 User Fee
Per Sheet Per Sheet New $1,393 $1,393 User Fee
Fourth or Subsequent Review Per Sheet New $464 $464 User Fee Other Improvement Plans: As Directed by City Engineer Deposit New Actual Cost + 15% Actual Cost + 15% User Fee Grading Permit Fees (Mass, Rough, Stockpile, Borrow)
Grading Permit:
51‐100 CY Each $45 $975 $975 User Fee
101‐1,000 CY
Base Base $45 $1,412 $1,412 User Fee
For Every 100 CY or Fraction Thereof Each 100CY $21 $57 $57 User Fee 1,001‐10,000 CY
Base Base $230 $1,923 $1,923 User Fee
For Every 1,000 CY or Fraction Thereof Each 1,000CY $25 $74 $74 User Fee 10,001‐100,000 CY
Base Base $380 $2,585 $2,585 User Fee
For Every 10,000 CY or Fraction Thereof Each 10,000CY $75 $175 $175 User Fee 100,001 or more CY
Base Base $1,075 $4,163 $4,163 User Fee
For Every 100,000 CY or Fraction Thereof Each 100,000CY $85 $132 $132 User Fee Encroachment Permit Fees
Encroachment Permit Each $352 $1,643 $400 User Fee
Excavation Permit Each New $1,643 $400 User Fee
Demolition Each New $1,643 $400 User Fee
Curb & Gutter:
<100 ft. Base $60 $496 $496 User Fee
>100 ft. Per 100 ft $43 $188 $188 User Fee
Sidewalk:
<400 sq. ft Base $60 $456 $456 User Fee
>400 sq. ft Per 100 ft $19 $148 $148 User Fee
Pavement:
<1,000 ft. Base $120 $556 $556 User Fee
Each Additional 1,000 ft. Each Add'l 1,000 Ft. $95 $248 $248 User Fee Driveway Approach:
Residential Each $60 $620 $620 User Fee
Commercial Each $81 $660 $660 User Fee
Wheelchair Ramp Each $60 $536 $536 User Fee
Cross Gutter / Spandrel Each $103 $496 $496 User Fee
Sewer main, storm drain, water main:
<50 ft. Base $82 $716 $716 User Fee
>50 ft. Per 50 LF $43 $377 $377 User Fee
Sewer Lateral Each $60 $815 $815 User Fee
Water Service Each $60 $617 $617 User Fee
Sewer Manhole Each $81 $737 $737 User Fee
Sewer Clean Out Each $82 $557 $557 User Fee
198
Water Line Hot Tap Each $174 $815 $815 User Fee
Storm Drain Inlet:
Storm Drain Inlet Each $189 $868 $868 User Fee
Storm Drain Connector Pipe Each $145 $748 $748 User Fee Parkway Drain Each $81 $748 $748 User Fee
Fire Hydrant Each $270 $776 $776 User Fee
Air Vac Blow Off Each $103 $656 $656 User Fee
Street Tree Each $60 $368 $368 User Fee
Street Name & Traffic Sign Each $60 $368 $368 User Fee
Inspections
Industrial Waste Inspection Each $175 $175 $175 User Fee NPDES Inspection / Reinspection - (Grading) Per Acre Modified $594 $594 User Fee NPDES Inspection / Reinspection - (Stormwater Compliance) Commercial Food Facilities and Non-IG Permit Inspections Per Inspection New $331 $331 User Fee IG Permit Facilities, Businesses, and SB205 Compliance Per Inspection New $394 $394 User Fee Reinspection Charge Per Inspection New $257 $257 User Fee Overtime Inspection Per Hour 1.5 x time spent $266 $266 User Fee Re‐Inspection Fee Per Hour $154 $239 $239 User Fee
Inspections ‐ Subdivision Developments % of Est. Constr. Cost 4% 4% 4% User Fee Miscellaneous Fees
Reimbursement Agreement Each $1,056 $2,658 $2,658 User Fee Technology Surcharge % of Total Fees 2.5% 6.0% 6.0% User Fee Appeals to City Council or Planning Commission Each $543 $1,422 $1,422 User Fee Public Right of Way Items
Over sized/weight permit (Caltrans Rate):
Single Trip Per Trip $16 $16 $16 User Fee
Annual Each $90 $90 $90 User Fee
Penalty for Work w/o Permit Each $244 2x Permit Fees 2x Permit Fees User Fee Dumpster / POD in Public ROW Each New $331 $331 User Fee Street Closure Each New $557 $557 User Fee
Special District Annexation Deposit New Actual Cost + 15% Actual Cost + 15% User Fee Fee for Services Not Specified Above Per Hour New $294 $294 User Fee
FILM PERMITS
Film Permit Fee
Minor Impact Each $300 $1,024 $1,024 User Fee
Moderate Impact Each $300 $2,277 $2,277 User Fee
High Impact Each $300 $4,742 $4,742 User Fee
FINANCE
Document Printing / Photocopying Fees:
Black & White Per Copy $0.25 $0.25 $0.25 GOV § 6253(b)
Color Per Copy $0.35 $0.35 $0.35 GOV § 6253(b)
Oversized (maps) Each Actual Cost $0.00 $0.00 GOV § 6253(b) Bound Document Fees:
Binding Materials Each $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 GOV § 6253(b)
199
Per Page Charge
Black & White Per Copy $0.25 $0.25 $0.25 GOV § 6253(b)
Color Per Copy $0.35 $0.35 $0.35 GOV § 6253(b)
Document Certification Each Modified $15.00 $15.00 GOV § 8223 (b) Postage Each Actual Cost $0.00 $0.00 User Fee
Return Check Processing:
1st Check Each $25 $25 $25 CIV § 1719(a)
2nd Check Each $25 $35 $35 CIV § 1719(a)
Digital Copy of any City live broadcast Each per DVD $7 $7 $7 GOV § 6253.9(a) FIRE
FIRE FEES FOR SPRINKLER PERMITS (FSS, FSD, FMS)
New 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System plan check (base fee) Each $662 $719 $719 User Fee New 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System inspection (per sprinkler head) Per Sprinkler Head $7 $10 $10 User Fee New 13D Fire Sprinkler System plan check (base fee) Each $284 $308 $308 User Fee New 13D Fire Sprinkler System inspection (per sprinkler head) (each separate plan type) Per Sprinkler Head $7 $10 $10 User Fee TI 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System plan check (base fee) Each $473 $513 $513 User Fee TI 13, 13R Fire Sprinkler System inspection (per sprinkler head) Per Sprinkler Head $7 $10 $10 User Fee TI 13D Fire Sprinkler System plan check (base fee) Each $237 $256 $256 User Fee TI 13D Fire Sprinkler System inspection (per sprinkler head) Per Sprinkler Head $7 $10 $10 User Fee Construction Reinspection Fee (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.) Each $756 $822 $822 User Fee Additional Alternate methods and materials Plan Review (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Consultant Fire Plan Review Deposit Actual Cost + 20% Actual Cost + 15% Actual Cost + 15% User Fee Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee 3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Expedited / Overtime Plan Review (per hour) Per Hour $284 $308 $308 User Fee Expedited / Overtime Inspection (per hour) Per Hour $284 $308 $308 User Fee Work without Permit (PENALTY) Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee
FIRE FEES FOR ALARM PERMITS (FAL)
New Fire Alarm System plan check (base fee) Each $662 $719 $719 User Fee New Fire Alarm System inspection (per initiating or notification device) Per Device $7 $10 $10 User Fee TI Fire Alarm System Plan Check (base fee) Each $473 $513 $513 User Fee TI Fire Alarm System Inspection (per initiating or notification device) Per Device $7 $10 $10 User Fee Monitoring Only Plan Check (or Communicator upgrade per unit) Per Unit $189 $205 $205 User Fee Monitoring Only Inspection (or Communicator upgrade per unit) Per Unit $189 $205 $205 User Fee Construction Reinspection Fee (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.) Each $756 $822 $822 User Fee Additional Alternate methods and materials Plan Review (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Consultant Fire Plan Review Deposit Actual Cost + 20% Actual Cost + 15% Actual Cost + 15% User Fee Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee 3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Expedited / Overtime Plan Review (per hour) Per Hour $284 $308 $308 User Fee Expedited / Overtime Inspection (per hour) Per Hour $284 $308 $308 User Fee Work without Permit (PENALTY) Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee
FIRE FEES FOR WATER SYSTEM PERMITS (FWT)
Underground plan check (per connection ie hydrant and/or riser) Per Connection $284 $308 $308 User Fee 200
Underground inspection (per connection ie hydrant and/or riser) Per Connection $378 $411 $411 User Fee Fire Pump plan check Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee
Fire Pump inspection Each $473 $513 $513 User Fee
Aboveground Temporary Tank plan check Each $284 $308 $308 User Fee Aboveground Temporary Tank inspection Each $284 $308 $308 User Fee Emergency Underground Repair plan check Each $284 $308 $308 User Fee Emergency Underground Repair inspection Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee Standpipes/Hose valves plan check Each $284 $308 $308 User Fee Standpipes/Hose valves inspection Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee Construction Reinspection Fee (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.) Each $756 $822 $822 User Fee Additional Alternate methods and materials Plan Review (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Consultant Fire Plan Review Deposit Actual Cost + 20% Actual Cost + 15% Actual Cost + 15% User Fee Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee 3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Expedited / Overtime Plan Review (per hour) Per Hour $284 $308 $308 User Fee Expedited / Overtime Inspection (per hour) Per Hour $284 $308 $308 User Fee Work without Permit (PENALTY) Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee
FIRE FEES FOR PROTECTION SYSTEMS PERMITS (FPS)
Special Extinguishing System plan check Each $520 $565 $565 User Fee Special Extinguishing System inspection Each $284 $308 $308 User Fee Hood and Duct Extinguishing System plan check (per system) Per System $284 $308 $308 User Fee Hood and Duct Extinguishing System inspection (per system) Per System $284 $308 $308 User Fee Smoke Control - Rationale Analysis and Plan Review Each $1,323 $1,439 $1,439 User Fee Smoke Control System inspection Each $1,134 $1,233 $1,233 User Fee Construction Reinspection Fee (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.) Each $756 $822 $822 User Fee Additional Alternate methods and materials Plan Review (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Consultant Fire Plan Review Deposit Actual Cost + 20% Actual Cost + 15% Actual Cost + 15% User Fee Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee 3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Expedited / Overtime Plan Review (per hour) Per Hour $284 $308 $308 User Fee Expedited / Overtime Inspection (per hour) Per Hour $284 $308 $308 User Fee Work without Permit (PENALTY) Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee
FIRE FEES FOR OTHER SYSTEMS PERMITS (FOS)
Industrial Oven plan check (per oven) Per Oven $378 $411 $411 User Fee Industrial Oven inspection (per oven) Per Oven $378 $411 $411 User Fee Dust Collection System plan check Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee Dust Collection System inspection Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee Battery System plan check (Commercial) Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee Battery System inspection (Commercial) Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee Refrigeration System < 500 lbs. plan check Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee Refrigeration System < 500 lbs. inspection Each $284 $308 $308 User Fee Refrigeration System ≥ 500 lbs. plan check Each $945 $1,027 $1,027 User Fee Refrigeration System ≥ 500 lbs. inspection Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee Spray Booths (per booth) plan check Per Booth $284 $308 $308 User Fee 201
Spray Booths (per booth) inspection Per Booth $189 $205 $205 User Fee Gas Systems (Med Gas, Industrial Gas, LPG) plan check Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee Gas Systems (Med Gas, Industrial Gas, LPG) inspection Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee Emergency Responder Radio Coverage plan check Each $756 $822 $822 User Fee Emergency Responder Radio Coverage inspection Each $756 $822 $822 User Fee Construction Reinspection Fee (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.) Each $756 $822 $822 User Fee Additional Alternate methods and materials Plan Review (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Consultant Fire Plan Review Deposit Acutal Cost + 20% Actual Cost + 15% Actual Cost + 15% User Fee Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee 3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Expedited / Overtime Plan Review (per hour) Per Hour $284 $308 $308 User Fee Expedited / Overtime Inspection (per hour) Per Hour $284 $308 $308 User Fee Work without Permit (PENALTY) Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee
FIRE FEES FOR ACCESS & WATER REVIEWS (FAW, FPP)
Access and Water Supply plan check Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee Access and Water Supply inspection Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee Fuel Modification Plan check Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee Fuel Modification inspection Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee Construction Reinspection Fee (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.) Each $756 $822 $822 User Fee Additional Alternate methods and materials Plan Review (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Consultant Fire Plan Review Deposit Actual Cost + 20% Actual Cost + 15% Actual Cost + 15% User Fee Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee 3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Expedited / Overtime Plan Review (per hour) Per Hour $284 $308 $308 User Fee Expedited / Overtime Inspection (per hour) Per Hour $284 $308 $308 User Fee Work without Permit (PENALTY) Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee
FIRE FEES FOR HAZ MAT PERMITS (FHM)
Haz-Mat Chem Class <10 Chemicals plan check Each $284 $308 $308 User Fee Haz-Mat Chem Class<10 Chemicals inspection Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee Haz-Mat Chem Class 10 - 25 Chemicals plan check Each $473 $513 $513 User Fee Haz-Mat Chem Class 10 - 25 Chemicals inspection Each $284 $308 $308 User Fee Haz-Mat Chem Class 26 - 100 Chemicals plan check Each $756 $822 $822 User Fee Haz-Mat Chem Class 26 - 100 Chemicals inspection Each $473 $513 $513 User Fee Haz-Mat Chem Class >100 Chemicals plan check Each $1,040 $1,130 $1,130 User Fee Haz-Mat Chem Class >100 Chemicals inspection Each $662 $719 $719 User Fee Underground Storage Tanks plan check (per tank) Installation or Removal Per Tank $426 $462 $462 User Fee Underground Storage Tanks inspection (per tank) Installation or Removal Per Tank $189 $205 $205 User Fee Aboveground Storage Tanks plan check (per tank) Installation or Removal Per Tank $426 $462 $462 User Fee Aboveground Storage Tanks inspection (per tank) Installation or Removal Per Tank $189 $205 $205 User Fee Alterations to gas stations plan check (no tank alterations) Each $284 $308 $308 User Fee Alterations to gas stations inspection (no tank alterations) Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee Construction Reinspection Fee (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.) Each $756 $822 $822 User Fee Additional Alternate methods and materials Plan Review (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee 202
Consultant Fire Plan Review Deposit Actual Cost + 20% Actual Cost + 15% Actual Cost + 15% User Fee Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee 3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Expedited / Overtime Plan Review (per hour) Per Hour $284 $308 $308 User Fee Expedited / Overtime Inspection (per hour) Per Hour $284 $308 $308 User Fee Work without Permit (PENALTY) Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee
FIRE FEES FOR HIGH PILE STORAGE PERMITS (FHP)
High Pile Storage <12,000 sq. ft. Plan Check Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee High Pile Storage <12,000 sq. ft. Inspection Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee High Pile Storage 12,001 - 50,000 sq. ft. Plan Check Each $756 $822 $822 User Fee High Pile Storage 12,001 - 50,000 sq. ft. Inspection Each $756 $822 $822 User Fee High Pile Storage 50,001 - 100,000 sq. ft. Plan Check Each $1,134 $1,233 $1,233 User Fee High Pile Storage 50,001 - 100,000 sq. ft. Inspection Each $1,134 $1,233 $1,233 User Fee High Pile Storage > 100,000 sq. ft. Plan Check Each $1,512 $1,644 $1,644 User Fee High Pile Storage > 100,000 sq. ft. Inspection Each $1,512 $1,644 $1,644 User Fee Construction Reinspection Fee (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Alternate methods and materials (initial - 4 hrs. min.) Each $756 $822 $822 User Fee Additional Alternate methods and materials Plan Review (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Consultant Fire Plan Review Deposit Actual Cost + 20% Actual Cost + 15% Actual Cost + 15% User Fee Misc./Over the Counter/ Revisions (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee 3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Expedited / Overtime Plan Review (per hour) Per Hour $284 $308 $308 User Fee Expedited / Overtime Inspection (per hour) Per Hour $284 $308 $308 User Fee Work without Permit (PENALTY) Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee
FIRE FEES FOR INSPECTIONS (FIN)
Residential Care Facility Pre-inspection (6 or less) Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee Residential Day Care Facility 8-14 Fire Clearance Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee Special Event WITH tents and/or canopies >400 sq. ft. Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee Special Event with NO tents and/or canopies Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee Carnivals and Fairs Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee
Explosives or Blasting Agents, use, dispose Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee Firework Displays Each $1,134 $1,233 $1,233 User Fee
Complaints (not on fee schedule but is documented under this record type) Each $0 $102 $0 User Fee Fire Clearances (not on fee schedule but is documented under this record type for hospital, res. care facility 850 fire clearance, etc) Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee Hydrant/Control Valve Flow Test Each $284 $308 $308 User Fee Fire Standby (per hour - During work hours) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Fire Standby (per hour - During off work hours OVERTIME) Per Hour $284 $308 $308 User Fee Miscellaneous Inspection (uses 1 hour of the hourly rate fee) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee
MISCELLANEOUS FIRE FEES
Plan Review (per hour) for items not identified on fee schedule Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Inspection (per hour) for items not identified on fee schedule Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee False Alarm - Commercial / Industrial Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee False Alarm - Residential Each $378 $411 $189 User Fee
False Alarm Response (Only applicable after 3rd False Alarm) Each New $411 $411 User Fee
ANNUAL PERMITS
Business
203
A-1 occupancies: Assembly uses, usually with fixed seating, intended for the production and viewing of performing arts or motion pictures <20,000 sq. ft. Per Year $284 $308 $308 User Fee A-1 occupancies: Assembly uses, usually with fixed seating, intended for the production and viewing of performing arts or motion pictures ≥20,000 sq. ft. Per Year $567 $616 $616 User Fee A-2 occupancies: Assembly uses intended for food and/or drink consumption <10,000 sq. ft.Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee A-2 occupancies: Assembly uses intended for food and/or drink consumption > 10,000 sq. ft.Per Year $284 $308 $308 User Fee A-3 occupancies: Assembly uses intended for worship, recreation or amusement and other assembly occupancies not classified as A-1,A-2,A-4, and A-5 occupancies <20,000 sq. ft. Per Year $284 $308 $308 User Fee A-3 occupancies: Assembly uses intended for worship, recreation or amusement and other assembly occupancies not classified as A-1,A-2,A-4, and A-5 occupancies ≥20,000 sq. ft. Per Year $567 $616 $616 User Fee A-4 occupancies: Assembly uses intended for viewing of indoor sporting events and activities with spectator seating <20,000 sq. ft. Per Year $284 $308 $308 User Fee A-4 occupancies: Assembly uses intended for viewing of indoor sporting events and activities with spectator seating ≥20,000 sq. ft. Per Year $567 $616 $616 User Fee A-5 occupancies: Assembly uses intended for participation in or viewing outdoor activities. Per Year $284 $308 $308 User Fee B,F,M or S Occupancies < 3,600 Square Feet Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee B,F,M or S Occupancies 3,601 - 50,000 Square Feet Per Year $378 $411 $411 User Fee B,F,M or S Occupancies 50,001 - 350,000 sq. ft. Per Year $567 $616 $616 User Fee B,F,M or S Occupancies > 350,000 sq. ft. Per Year $1,134 $1,233 $1,233 User Fee H or L Occupancy Per Year $567 $616 $616 User Fee
2nd Re-Inspection Penalty (Penalty of $189+ reinspection fee $189= $378) Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee 3rd + Re-inspection Penalty (Penalty of $200 + reinspection fee $300 = $500) Each $500 $543 $543 User Fee Work without Permit (PENALTY) Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee Multi-Family
R-1 Occupancy (i.e. hotels, motels) <25 units Per Year $567 $616 $616 User Fee R-1 Occupancy (i.e. hotels, motels) 26-50 units Per Year $709 $770 $770 User Fee R-1 Occupancy (i.e. hotels, motels) 51-75 units Per Year $851 $925 $925 User Fee R-1 Occupancy (i.e. hotels, motels) 76-100 units Per Year $993 $1,079 $1,079 User Fee R-1 Occupancy (i.e. hotels, motels) >100 units Per Year $1,134 $1,233 $1,233 User Fee R-2 Occupancy (i.e. Res Permanent 3+) per unit Per Year $48 $51 $48 User Fee Care Facility Residential State Licensed - 6 or less Pre-inspection Fee Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee Care Facility Commercial 0-50 State Licensed Per Year $378 $411 $411 User Fee Care Facility Commercial 51-99 State Licensed Per Year $473 $513 $513 User Fee Care Facility Commercial 100-150 State Licensed Per Year $567 $616 $616 User Fee Care Facility Commercial ≥ 151 State Licensed Per Year $756 $822 $822 User Fee 2nd Re-Inspection Penalty (Penalty of $189+ reinspection fee $189= $378) Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee 3rd + Re-inspection Penalty (Penalty of $200 + reinspection fee $300 = $500) Each $500 $543 $543 User Fee Work without Permit (PENALTY) Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee State-Mandated
E Occupancy (Schools) <10,000 sq. ft. Per Year $284 $308 $308 User Fee E Occupancy (Schools) > 10,000 sq. ft. Per Year $756 $822 $822 User Fee Hospitals <10,000 S.F. Per Year $284 $308 $308 User Fee Hospitals > 10,000 S.F. Per Year $756 $822 $822 User Fee Skilled Nursing < 10,000 S.F. Per Year $284 $308 $308 User Fee Skilled Nursing > 10,000 S.F. Per Year $756 $822 $822 User Fee Jail <10,000 S.F. Per Year $284 $308 $308 User Fee
Jail > 10,000 S.F. Per Year $756 $822 $822 User Fee
High-Rise 75' or more Per Year $1,134 $1,233 $1,233 User Fee Day Care Facilities Residential 8-14 Fire Clearance Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee Day Care Facilities Commercial 0-50 Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee Day Care Facilities Commercial 51-100 Per Year $378 $411 $411 User Fee Day Care Facilities Commercial 101-150 Per Year $430 $462 $462 User Fee 204
Day Care Facilities Commercial >150 Per Year $473 $513 $513 User Fee 2nd Re-Inspection Penalty (Penalty of $189+ reinspection fee $189= $378) Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee 3rd + Re-inspection Penalty (Penalty of $200 + reinspection fee $300 = $500) Each $500 $543 $543 User Fee Work without Permit (PENALTY) Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee Fire Code Permits (CFC Operational Permits)
Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing) Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee Aerosol Products Level 2 & 3 Per Year $95 $102 $102 User Fee Amusement Buildings (Special Amusement Buildings) Per Year $284 $308 $308 User Fee Carnivals and Fairs Per Year $95 $102 $102 User Fee
Cellulose Nitrate Per Year $95 $102 $102 User Fee
Combustible Dust Producing & Operations Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee Combustible Fibers Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee
Compressed Gases Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee
Covered and Uncovered Mall Buildings Per Year $284 $308 $308 User Fee Cryogenic Fluids Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee
Cutting and Welding Per Year $95 $102 $102 User Fee
Dry Cleaning Plants 1-2 units Per Year $95 $102 $102 User Fee Dry Cleaning Plants > 2 units Per Year $284 $308 $308 User Fee Energy Storage System Per Year $378 $411 $411 User Fee
Exhibits and trade Shows Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee Explosives Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee
Hydrant/Control Valve Flow Test Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee Flammable/Combustible Liquids Inside ≥60 Gal. Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee Flammable/Combustible Liquids Inside <60 Gal. Per Year $95 $102 $102 User Fee Flammable/Combustible Liquid Outside/Aboveground tank (per tank) Per Year $142 $154 $154 User Fee Flammable/Combustible Liquid Underground Tanks (per tank) Per Year $142 $154 $154 User Fee Fruit and Crop Ripening Per Year $142 $154 $154 User Fee Hazardous Materials Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee
Hazardous Production Materials Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee High-Piled Combustible Stock <12,000 sq. ft. Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee High-Piled Combustible Stock 12,000 - 100,000 sq. ft. Per Year $473 $513 $513 User Fee High-Piled Combustible Stock >100,000 sq. ft. Per Year $756 $822 $822 User Fee Hot Work Operations Per Year $95 $102 $102 User Fee
Industrial Ovens/Drying Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee Lumber yards and woodworking plants Per Year $378 $411 $411 User Fee Liquid or Gas Filled Vehicles in Assemblies Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee Liquefied Petroleum Gases Per Year $95 $102 $102 User Fee Magnesium Per Year $95 $102 $102 User Fee
Miscellaneous Combustible Storage Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee Mobile Fueling of Hydrogen Fueled Vehicles Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee Motor vehicle Fuel Dispensing Facilities Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee Open Flame and/ or Candles in Assembly Occupancies Per Year $95 $102 $102 User Fee Organic Coatings Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee
Places of Assembly Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee
Plant Extraction Systems Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee Pyrotechnical Special Effects Per Year $756 $822 $822 User Fee 205
Pyroxylin plastics Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee
Refrigeration Equipment <500 lbs. Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee Refrigeration Equipment ≥500 lbs. Per Year $378 $411 $411 User Fee Repair Garages and Motor Fuel Dispensing Facitlies Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee Spray Booths/ Dipping Operations Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee Storage of Tires Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee
Tire Rebuilding Plants Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee Waste Handling Per Year $95 $102 $102 User Fee
Wood products Per Year $95 $102 $102 User Fee
Lithium Batteries Per Year $189 $205 $205 User Fee
FIRE BUILDING PERMIT FEES - PLAN CHECK
Buildings for all Commercial Uses - (The enclosure for all newly constructed or added space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, I, M, S, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule where the interior is completed and occupiable (same fees as shell buildings) 0-1,999 sq. ft. Flat $189 $205 $205 User Fee
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. Flat $237 $256 $256 User Fee
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. Flat $284 $308 $308 User Fee
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. Flat $378 $411 $411 User Fee
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. Flat $473 $513 $513 User Fee
50,000+ Base $473 $513 $513 User Fee
50,000+ Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. $9 $9 $9 User Fee
Residential and Multifamily Residential Uses - (All newly constructed or added space for residential occupancies classified as CBC Group R , or other residential occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule)
0-1,999 sq. ft. Flat $189 $205 $205 User Fee
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. Flat $237 $256 $256 User Fee
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. Flat $284 $308 $308 User Fee
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. Flat $378 $411 $411 User Fee
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. Flat $473 $513 $513 User Fee
50,000+ Base $473 $513 $513 User Fee
50,000+ Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. $9 $9 $9 User Fee
Hazardous Use - (All newly constructed or added space for hazardous use occupancies classified as CBC Group H.
0-1,999 sq. ft. Flat $237 $256 $256 User Fee
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. Flat $378 $411 $411 User Fee
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. Flat $520 $565 $565 User Fee
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. Flat $662 $719 $719 User Fee
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. Flat $804 $873 $873 User Fee
50,000+ Base $804 $873 $873 User Fee
50,000+ Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. $9 $9 $9 User Fee
Shell Buildings for all Commercial Uses - (The enclosure for all newly constructed or added space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, I, M, S, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule where the interior is not completed or occupiable) 0-1,999 sq. ft. Flat $189 $205 $205 User Fee
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. Flat $237 $256 $256 User Fee
206
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. Flat $284 $308 $308 User Fee
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. Flat $378 $411 $411 User Fee
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. Flat $473 $513 $513 User Fee
50,000+ Base $473 $513 $513 User Fee
50,000+ Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. $9 $9 $9 User Fee
Tenant Improvement - (Remodeled space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, I, M, R, S, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere.)
0-1,999 sq. ft. Flat $189 $205 $205 User Fee
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. Flat $237 $256 $256 User Fee
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. Flat $284 $308 $308 User Fee
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. Flat $378 $411 $411 User Fee
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. Flat $473 $513 $513 User Fee
50,000+ Base $473 $513 $513 User Fee
50,000+ Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. $9 $9 $9 User Fee
Tenant Improvement - Hazardous Use (Remodeled space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group H.
0-1,999 sq. ft. Flat $189 $205 $205 User Fee
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. Flat $284 $308 $308 User Fee
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. Flat $426 $462 $462 User Fee
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. Flat $567 $616 $616 User Fee
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. Flat $709 $770 $770 User Fee
50,000+ Base $709 $770 $770 User Fee
50,000+ Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. $14 $14 $14 User Fee
SOLAR / PHOTOVOLTAIC (BON / BFR / BRC)
Residential (Over 20 kw) Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee
Commercial Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee
Generator / Cell Sites
Generator / Cell Sites Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee
FIRE BUILDING PERMIT FEES - INSPECTION
Buildings for all Commercial Uses - (The enclosure for all newly constructed or added space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, I, M, S, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule where the interior is completed and occupiable (same fees as shell buildings) 0-1,999 sq. ft. Flat $189 $205 $205 User Fee
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. Flat $237 $256 $256 User Fee
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. Flat $284 $308 $308 User Fee
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. Flat $378 $411 $411 User Fee
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. Flat $473 $513 $513 User Fee
50,000+ Base $473 $513 $513 User Fee
50,000+ Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. $9 $9 $9 User Fee
Residential and Multifamily Residential Uses - (All newly constructed or added space for residential occupancies classified as CBC Group R , or other residential occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule)
0-1,999 sq. ft. Flat $189 $205 $205 User Fee
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. Flat $237 $256 $256 User Fee
207
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. Flat $284 $308 $308 User Fee
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. Flat $378 $411 $411 User Fee
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. Flat $473 $513 $513 User Fee
50,000+ Base $473 $513 $513 User Fee
50,000+ Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. $9 $9 $9 User Fee
Hazardous Use - (All newly constructed or added space for hazardous use occupancies classified as CBC Group H.
0-1,999 sq. ft. Flat $237 $256 $256 User Fee
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. Flat $378 $411 $411 User Fee
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. Flat $520 $565 $565 User Fee
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. Flat $662 $719 $719 User Fee
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. Flat $804 $873 $873 User Fee
50,000+ Base $804 $873 $873 User Fee
50,000+ Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. $9 $9 $9 User Fee
Shell Buildings for all Commercial Uses - (The enclosure for all newly constructed or added space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, I, M, S, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere in this Fee Schedule where the interior is not completed or occupiable) 0-1,999 sq. ft. Flat $189 $205 $205 User Fee
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. Flat $237 $256 $256 User Fee
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. Flat $284 $308 $308 User Fee
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. Flat $378 $411 $411 User Fee
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. Flat $473 $513 $513 User Fee
50,000+ Base $473 $513 $513 User Fee
50,000+ Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. $9 $9 $9 User Fee
Tenant Improvement - (Remodeled space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group A, B, E, F, I, M, R, S, or other commercial occupancies not specifically addressed elsewhere.)
0-1,999 sq. ft. Flat $189 $205 $205 User Fee
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. Flat $237 $256 $256 User Fee
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. Flat $284 $308 $308 User Fee
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. Flat $378 $411 $411 User Fee
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. Flat $473 $513 $513 User Fee
50,000+ Base $473 $513 $513 User Fee
50,000+ Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. $9 $9 $9 User Fee
Tenant Improvement - Hazardous Use (Remodeled space for non-residential occupancies classified as CBC Group H.
0-1,999 sq. ft. Flat $189 $205 $205 User Fee
2,000-4,999 sq. ft. Flat $284 $308 $308 User Fee
5,000-9,999 sq. ft. Flat $426 $462 $462 User Fee
10,000-24,999 sq. ft. Flat $567 $616 $616 User Fee
25,000-49,999 sq. ft. Flat $709 $770 $770 User Fee
50,000+ Base $709 $770 $770 User Fee
50,000+ Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. $14 $14 $14 User Fee
SOLAR / PHOTOVOLTAIC (BON / BFR / BRC)
Residential (Over 20 kw) Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee
208
Commercial Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee
Generator / Cell Sites
Generator / Cell Sites Each $284 $308 $308 User Fee
ADDITIONAL FIRE FEES FOR BFC / BFR / BON
Consultant Fire Plan Review Each Actual Cost + 20% Actual Cost + 15% Actual Cost + 15% User Fee Misc. / Over the Counter / Revisions Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee 3rd review and subsequent submittals (per hour) Per Hour $189 $205 $205 User Fee Expedited / Overtime Plan Review (per hour) Per Hour $284 $308 $308 User Fee Expedited / Overtime Inspection (per hour) Per Hour $284 $308 $308 User Fee
FIRE PLANNING FEES
Entitlement Applications
Anexxation Fee Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee
Conditional Use Permit Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee
Conditional Use Permit Amendment Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee Conditional Use Permit - Sexually Oriented Business Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee Design Review Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee
Design Review Amendment Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee
Development Agreements Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee
EIR- Administrative Charge Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee Environmental Assessment Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee
Extension of Time, CUP, Design Review Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee Final Parcel Map Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee
Final Tract Map (First 50 Lots) Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee Final tract Map (51 + lots) Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee General Plan Amendment (Land Use) Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee General Plan Amendment (Policy) Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee Landscape Review Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee
Lot Line Adjustment (with existing building) Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee Minor Modification of an Application Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee Pre-Application Review (PAC) Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee Site Plan Review Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee
Specific Plan Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee
Specific Plan Amendment Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee
Temporary Use Permits - Minor Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee Temporary Use Permits - Major Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee Tentative Map Time Extension Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee Tentative Parcel Map Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee
Tentaive Tract Map (Less than 50 lots) Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee Tentaive Tract Map (50 lots or more) Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee Tentative Tract Map Condition Monitoring Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee Variance Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee
Zone Change Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee
Cannibis Retailer Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee Cannibis Cultivation, Manufacturing and Testing Laboratory Facilities Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee 209
Cannibus Microbusiness Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee Custom Home Review Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee
Development Agreement Amendment, Deposit Each $378 $411 $411 User Fee Home Occupation Permit Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee
Phasing Map Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee
Plot Plan
With hearing Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee
Without hearing (notice) Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee
Without hearing (no notice) Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee Amended plot plan/substantial conformance Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee Administrative (Includes second units) Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee Subdivision Sales Office (Trailer) and Model Home Complexes-Temporary Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee Tentative Parcel Map
Residential Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee
Commercial Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee
Tentative Tract or Condo Map Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee Tentative Tract or Parcel Map Revised Each $567 $616 $616 User Fee Precise Grading plan review, per sheet Each $284 $308 $308 User Fee Water/Sewer plan review, per sheet Each $284 $308 $308 User Fee 3rd review and subsequential submittals (per hour) Each $189 $205 $205 User Fee Parks & Recreation
Municipal Pool
Admissions:
Open Swim Lessons
Adults Per Person $3.50 $3.50 Recreation
Children/Seniors Per Person $2.50 $2.50 Recreation
Lessons:
Resident Per Person $50 $50 Recreation
Non‐Resident Per Person $55 $55 Recreation
Private Rentals Per Hour $161 $791 $210 Rental
Cabana Rentals (during open swim) Per Reservation $69 $134 $90 Rental Junior Life Guard Classes Per Person $65 $65 Recreation Water Exercise:
Water Exercise Per Class $5.00 $5 Recreation
Water Exercise ‐ Punch Card ‐ 10 Classes Per Card $40 $40 Recreation Activities
Youth Flag Football, Basketball & Soccer Per Session Per Child $60 $60 Recreation Day Camp Per Child Per Week $80 $80 Recreation
Contract Class Fees:
Contract Class Fees Monthly Fees set by instructor Fees set by instructor Recreation Contract Class Fees Per Class Fees set by instructor Fees set by instructor Recreation Adult Sport Leagues:
Softball Per Team $350 $350 Recreation
Basketball Per Team $280 $280 Recreation
Community Center Rental
210
Private Rates:
Gymnasium Per Day $140 $248 $182 Rental
Large Meeting Room Per Day $70 $248 $91 Rental
Small Meeting Room Per Day $60 $132 $78 Rental
Kitchen & Gym Per Day $325 $265 $250 Rental
Kitchen Only Per Day New $138 $125 Rental
Non‐Profit Rates:
Gymnasium Per Day $70 $248 $91 Rental
Large Meeting Room Per Day $35 $248 $45 Rental
Small Meeting Room Per Day $35 $132 $40 Rental
Kitchen & Gym Per Day $200 $265 $125 Rental
Kitchen Only Per Day New $138 $63 Rental
Senior Center Rental
Private Rates:
Nutrition Site Per Day $100 $171 $130 Rental
Multi‐Purpose Room Per Day $90 $152 $120 Rental
Non‐Profit Rates:
Nutrition Site Per Day $55 $171 $65 Rental
Multi‐Purpose Room Per Day $55 $152 $60 Rental
Art Welch Community Center
Private Rates:
Full Facility Rental Per Day New $376 $285 Rental
Kitchen Only Per Day New $127 $80 Rental
Non-Profit Rates:
Full Facility Rental Per Day New $376 $145 Rental
Kitchen Only Per Day New $127 $40 Rental
Parks Facilities
Private Rates:
Park Picnic Shelter Per Day $30 $35 $45 Rental
Ballfield & Soccer Field Rental
Field Rental Per Day $30 $36 $45 Rental
Field Lights - 2 hour minimum Per Hour $17 $37 $30 Rental Dysart Park Per Day $145 $429 $190 Rental
Amphitheater & Stage Per Day $45 $140 $90 Rental
Private Rates:
Playhouse Bowl Building Per Day $90 $88 $120 Rental
Roosevelt Park Building Per Day $90 $97 $120 Rental
Non‐Profit Rates:
Playhouse Bowl Building Per Day $90 $88 $60 Rental
Roosevelt Park Building Per Day $90 $97 $60 Rental
Staffing Fees
Monday - Friday 8:00am ‐ 5:00pm Per Hour $20 $99 $30 User Fee Monday - Friday After 5pm, Sat, Sun and City Holidays Per Hour $27 $111 $40 User Fee Misc. Fees
Security Deposit Deposit Varies Varies Varies User Fee
Hold the Date Fee Each $25 $25 Deposit
211
Program Refund Admin Fee Each New $15 $10 User Fee
Insurance Processing Each New $15 $10 User Fee
Custodial Each New $170 $60 User Fee
Vendor Fees (City Events)
Outdoor Crafts Fairs and Marketplaces:
Daily Per Day $5 $43 $40 User Fee
Yearly Annual $26 $217 $200 User Fee
Food Vendors
Permitted through Riverside County Per Day New $130 $85 User Fee Non-Permitted through Riverside County Per Day New $215 $145 User Fee Petting Zoo Per Day New $195 $100 User Fee
Carnival Per Day New $195 $150 User Fee
Special Events
Application Permit:
New Each New $130 $130 User Fee
Recurring Each New $65 $65 User Fee
Staffing Fees - Special Events
Police Officer Per Hour Per Person New $180 $180 User Fee Engineering (Street Closure) Per Hour Per Person New $212 $212 User Fee Fire Standby Per Hour Per Person New See Fire Fee Schedule See Fire Fee Schedule User Fee Fire Marshall Review Per Hour Per Person New See Fire Fee Schedule See Fire Fee Schedule User Fee Parks Staff Per Hour Per Person New $156 $156 User Fee
Recreation Staff Per Hour Per Person New $134 $134 User Fee Water Per Hour Per Person New $202 $202 User Fee
Electric Per Hour Per Person New $225 $225 User Fee
PLANNING
Annexation Fee Deposit $9,438 $10,000 $10,000 Deposit
Appeal of PC Decision Each $1,895 $5,673 $5,673 User Fee Appeal of Planning Dept. Decision Each $3,624 $5,673 $5,673 User Fee Certificate of Completion/Lot Line Adj Each $2,036 $1,028 $1,028 User Fee Conditional Use Permit:
Conditional Use Permit
Minor Each $4,888 $3,143 $3,143 User Fee
Major Each $4,888 $5,108 $5,108 User Fee
Conditional Use Permit Amendment Each $4,531 $3,143 $3,143 User Fee CUP ‐ Sexually Oriented Business Each $2,396 $7,598 $7,598 User Fee Design Review:
Design Review
Minor Each $6,093 $6,581 $6,581 User Fee
Major Each $6,093 $11,528 $11,528 User Fee
Design Review Amendment Each $4,635 $3,350 $3,350 User Fee Development Agreements:
Development Agreement Deposit $27,753 $27,753 $28,000 Deposit Development Agreement Amendment Each New $13,899 $13,899 User Fee Development Agreement Annual Review Each New $4,231 $4,231 User Fee Environmental:
212
Environmental Document Review Deposit Actual Cost Actual Cost + 15% Actual Cost + 15% Deposit Environmental ‐ Mitigation Monitoring Deposit $5,335 Actual Cost + 15% Actual Cost + 15% Deposit Environmental Filing Fee/ Environmental Fish and Game Fee Each Actual Cost Actual Cost + 15% Actual Cost + 15% Deposit CEQA Determination Each New $509 $509 User Fee
Extension of Time: CUP or Design Review Each $743 $1,635 $1,635 User Fee General Plan Amendment:
Land Use
Minor Each $8,296 $4,908 $4,908 User Fee
Major Each $8,296 $9,623 $9,623 User Fee
Lot Merger Each $697 $696 $696 User Fee
Minor Exception - See BMC Section 17.80 Each New $1,668 $1,668 User Fee Minor modification of an Application Each $1,047 $1,045 $1,045 User Fee Mural permit Each $673 $619 $619 User Fee
Noticing Fee for Public Hearing Each New $1,006 $1,006 User Fee Planning letters Each $174 $782 $782 User Fee
Pre-Application Conference Review Each No Charge $1,218 $1,218 User Fee SB9 Urban Lot Split - Two Unit Development Each New $2,367 $2,367 User Fee Sign Permit:
Freestanding Sign Each $517 $2,463 $2,463 User Fee
Panel Change Only Each $112 $500 $500 User Fee
Sign Program Each New $2,004 $2,004 User Fee
Sign Review Each $288 $816 $816 User Fee
Temp Signs Each $288 $389 $389 User Fee
Site Plan Review Each $890 $2,511 $2,511 User Fee
Specific Plan:
Specific Plan Deposit $17,215 $16,133 $20,000 Deposit
Specific Plan Amend Deposit $12,490 $11,656 $15,000 Deposit Temporary Use Permit: Each
Major Each Modified $2,454 $2,454 User Fee
Minor Each Modified $1,275 $1,275 User Fee
Technical Staff Review Each New $3,143 $3,143 User Fee
Unit Phasing Map Each $437 $488 $488 User Fee
Variance Each $4,423 $6,111 $6,111 User Fee
Zone Change Each $7,166 $11,331 $11,331 User Fee
Zone Text Amend. Each $7,200 $12,600 $12,600 User Fee
Technology Surcharge % of Permit 2.5% 6% 6% User Fee
Final Parcel Map Each $992 $1,921 $1,921 User Fee
Final Tract Map:
First 50 lots Each $1,569 $1,701 $1,701 User Fee
51+ lots Base $1,953 $1,701 $1,701 User Fee
Landscape Review
Minor Each $969 $982 $982 User Fee
Major Each $1,065 $2,947 $2,947 User Fee
Tentative Map Time Extension Each $3,634 $5,108 $5,108 User Fee Tentative Parcel Map Each $8,550 $11,530 $11,530 User Fee Tentative Tract Map:
213
Less than 50 lots Deposit $9,588 $15,824 $10,000 Deposit 50 lots or more Deposit $10,652 $15,824 $15,000 Deposit Condition/MMRP Monitoring Deposit $5,335 $3,297 $5,000 Deposit
CANNABIS BUSINESS FEES
Cannabis Retailer Regulatory Permit Each $5,180 $8,173 $8,173 User Fee Cannabis Cultivation, Manufacturing, and Testing Laboratory Facilities Regulatory Permit Each $4,870 $9,156 $9,156 User Fee Cannabis Microbusiness Regulatory Permit Each $5,180 $11,121 $11,121 User Fee Cannabis Retailer Conditional Use Permit Deposit $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Deposit Cannabis Cultivation, Manufacturing, and Testing Laboratory Facilities Conditional Use Permit Deposit $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Deposit
Cannabis Microbusiness Conditional Use Permit Deposit $10,000 $10,502 $10,000 Deposit Cannabis Regulatory Permit Renewal Each New $3,429 $3,429 User Fee POLICE
Miscellaneous
All Reports:
Black & White Per Page $0.25 $0.25 $0.25 GOV § 6253(b)
Color Per Page $0.35 $0.35 $0.35 GOV § 6253(b)
Photo Sales Charges Per CD / DVD / Flash Drive $10 $36 $36 User Fee Electronic Media Duplication Fee Per CD / DVD / Flash Drive $15 $44 $44 User Fee Report Request Form:
Black & White Per Page $0.25 $0.25 $0.25 GOV § 6253(b)
Color Per Page $0.35 $0.35 $0.35 GOV § 6253(b)
Photo Sales Charges Per CD / DVD / Flash Drive $10 $36 $36 User Fee Electronic Media Duplication Fee Per CD / DVD / Flash Drive $15 $44 $44 User Fee Special Events Charge (4 hr minimum):
Per Officer Per Staff Per Hour $98 $180 $180 User Fee
Per Corporal Per Staff Per Hour $105 $208 $208 User Fee Per Sergeant Per Staff Per Hour $120 $230 $230 User Fee Per Lieutenant Per Staff Per Hour $105 $268 $268 User Fee Per Captain Per Staff Per Hour $125 $269 $269 User Fee
Vehicle Storage Release:
Vehicle Storage Release Per Vehicle $115 $126 $126 User Fee 30 Day Per Vehicle $115 $126 $126 User Fee
False Alarm Response:
1st response Each $0 $0 User Fee
2nd response Each $0 $0 User Fee
3rd response Each $72 $72 User Fee
4th response Each $144 $144 User Fee
5th + response Each $144 $144 User Fee
Clearance Letter Fee Per Letter $25 $48 $48 User Fee
Livescan Fingerprint Fee Each $15 $48 $48 User Fee
Civil Court Case Charge Each Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost User Fee Repo Receipt Fee Each $15 $24 $24 User Fee
UTILITY BILLING
Electric / Water Deposit:
Electric / Water Deposit ‐ Residential ‐ Initial ‐ Credit Check 214
Green Rating Deposit $0 $26 $0 User Fee
Yellow Rating Deposit $100 $105 $105 User Fee
Red Rating Deposit $150 $158 $158 User Fee
No Credit Check Deposit $0 $26 $26 User Fee
Letter of Credit Deposit $150 $158 $158 User Fee
Cut/Broken Lock Fee Each $15 $72 $72 User Fee
Radio Wire Repair Fee Each New $414 $414 User Fee
Broken Meter Box Replacement Each New $1,148 $1,148 User Fee Electric / Water Account Set:
Next business day Each $30 $415 $45 User Fee
Same Day (8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.; 1:00-3:00pm) Each $45 $415 $65 User Fee After Hours (3:00 - 8:00 a.m. next business day & holidays and weekends) Each $219 $384 $300 User Fee Miscellaneous Fees
Delinquent Notice Fee Each $18.00 $200 $25 User Fee
Door Hanger Fee Each $13.50 $296 $20 User Fee
Water & Waste Water Utility Fees
Water Meter Reinstallation Fee:
3/4" Meter Each $142 $405 $405 User Fee
1" Meter Each $142 $405 $405 User Fee
1 1/2 " Meter Each $142 $835 $835 User Fee
2" Meter Each $142 $835 $835 User Fee
Anything larger than 2" Each $142 $1,389 $1,389 User Fee Water Meter Installation Fee of (Brand New Service):
3/4" Meter Per Meter $285 $563 $563 User Fee
1" Meter Per Meter $414 $588 $588 User Fee
1 1/2 " Meter Per Meter $608 $1,176 $1,176 User Fee
2" Meter Per Meter $875 $1,227 $1,227 User Fee
Anything larger than 2" Per Meter T & M $131 $131 User Fee Water Meter Test Fee:
First Test
3/4" Meter First Test $0 $833 $833 User Fee
1" Meter First Test $0 $853 $853 User Fee
1 1/2 " Meter First Test $0 $1,291 $1,291 User Fee
2" Meter First Test $0 $1,292 $1,292 User Fee
Anything larger than 2" First Test $0 Actual Cost + 15% Actual Cost + 15% User Fee Each Additional Test
3/4" Meter Per Test $100 $833 $833 User Fee
1" Meter Per Test $100 $853 $853 User Fee
1 1/2 " Meter Per Test $100 $1,291 $1,291 User Fee
2" Meter Per Test $100 $1,292 $1,292 User Fee
Anything larger than 2" Per Test $100 Actual Cost + 15% Actual Cost + 15% User Fee Water Backflow/Cross Connection Testing:
1" Meter Each $82 $296 $296 User Fee
1 1/2 " Meter Each $82 $296 $296 User Fee
2" Meter Each $82 $296 $296 User Fee
Anything larger than 2" Each $82 $398 $398 User Fee
215
Fire Protection Meter Each $82 $500 $500 User Fee
Backflow Device Installation ‐ Time & Materials Each T & M Actual Cost + 15% Actual Cost + 15% User Fee Fire Flow Test:
4" - 8" Each $95 $1,190 $1,190 User Fee
10" and above Each $95 $1,608 $1,608 User Fee
Installation of Gate Valve Fee:
Installation of Gate Valve Fee Per Hour $87 $214 $214 User Fee Installation of Gate Valve Fee - Materials Each Actual Cost Actual Cost + 15% Actual Cost + 15% User Fee Installation of Angle Valve Fee:
Installation of Angle Valve Fee - 3/4" Each New $861 $861 User Fee Installation of Angle Valve Fee - 1" Each New $918 $918 User Fee Water Service Lateral Installation:
3/4" Meter Each $4,025 $12,238 $12,238 User Fee
1" Meter Each $4,140 $12,238 $12,238 User Fee
1 1/2" Meter Each $4,685 $22,519 $22,519 User Fee
2" Meter Each $4,855 $22,520 $22,520 User Fee
>2" Meter Each T & M Actual Cost + 15% Actual Cost + 15% User Fee Construction water meter deposit (hydrant meter):
3" Water Meter Deposit (Per Meter) Deposit $800 $2,700 $2,700 User Fee 4" Water Meter Deposit (Per Meter) Deposit $800 $4,048 $4,048 User Fee 6" Water Meter Deposit (Per Meter) Deposit $800 $5,400 $5,400 User Fee Sewer Connection Investigation ‐ Dye Check Each $95 $478 $478 User Fee Trespass/Diversion/Theft of Service:
1st offense Per Offense $300 $876 $876 User Fee
2nd offense Per Offense $600 $876 $876 User Fee
Water Plan Review
Building Plan Review
Single-Family Residential Each New $198 $198 User Fee
Commercial Each New $596 $596 User Fee
Planning Entitlement Reviews Each New $298 $298 User Fee Engineering Application Support Each New $198 $198 User Fee Wastewater Fees
FOG (Fats, Oils, and Grease)
Inspection Fixed New $121 $121 User Fee
Re-Inspection Fixed New $121 $121 User Fee
Industrial Waste Inspection (incl. Permit) Fixed New $500 $500 User Fee Industrial Waste Re-Inspection Fixed New $297 $297 User Fee Installation of Long-Side Sewer Lateral Each New T&M T&M User Fee Installation of Short-Side Sewer Lateral Each New T&M T&M User Fee CCTV Investigation (non-dye testing purposes) Each New T&M T&M User Fee Sewer Main Line Cleaning (non-routine cleaning) Each New T&M T&M User Fee 216
Chapter 3.36 - FEE AND SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE/ COST COMPARISON
3.36.010 - Intent.
Pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, it is the intent of the city council to require the ascertainment and recovery of costs reasonably borne from fees and charges levied therefor in providing the regulation, products or services hereinafter enumerated in this chapter. (Code 1965, § 29-1.)
3.36.020 - Definitions.
The following words, terms and phrases when used in this chapter shall have meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:
"Developer" means any person legally responsible for payment of any development impact or other fees in connection with a commercial development pursuant to this Code or any ordinance or resolution of the city.
"Development" means any project undertaken for the purpose of developing real property for residential, commercial, industrial or other uses, or any combination thereof, including a project involving the issuance of a permit for construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation or expansion, but not a permit to operate.
"Development impact fees" mean monetary exactions other than taxes or special assessments, established by either ordinance or resolution of the city council for a broad class of developments, or upon a specific development on an individual basis, in connection with the city's approval thereof for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of construction of public improvements and community amenities, but excluding the multispecies habitat conversation fee and the transportation uniform mitigation fee as defined in this section.
"Direct variable program costs" mean all applicable direct variable costs that would be eliminated if a program did not operate, including, without limitation, salaries, wages, fringe benefits, program specific supplies for program operation and maintenance, officials, and other direct expenses incurred. "Discretionary approval" means any regulatory land use action or approval by the city as to which the exercise of discretion is vested in the city or its officials, officers or employees and includes, but is not limited to the following: any tentative tract or parcel map, lot line adjustment, variance, conditional use permit, zone change or zoning code amendment, general plan amendment, development agreement, building permit, demolition permit, grading permit, administrative site plan, or design review. "Economic zone" means either one of the following areas:
10/2/25, 9:57 AM Banning, CA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 1/15
217
1. 2.
1. a.
D&M Economic Zone. All of that real property located within the boundaries of the Banning Merged Downtown and Midway Redevelopment Project Area that is zoned for commercial uses or otherwise designated for commercial use under the Banning General Plan, as may from time to time be updated and amended, as depicted in the diagram on file with the planning department, and as such boundaries may be amended from time to time.
SBL Economic Zone. All of that real property located within the City of Banning, California in proximity to Sun Lakes Boulevard that is zoned for commercial use or otherwise designated for commercial use under the Banning General Plan, as may from time to time be updated and amended, as depicted in the diagram on file with the planning department, as such area may be amended from time to time.
"Multispecies habitat conservation plan fee" means the impact fee imposed and levied under Ordinance 1305, as codified in Chapter 15.72 of this Code adopting the "Multispecies Habitat Conservation Plan" (MSHCP). The MSHCP establishes a fee known as the MSHCP fee, the purpose of which is to mitigate the incidental take of listed, threatened, and protected species and their habitats within areas of western Riverside County, including the City of Banning. The city has decided to participate in the MSHCP through the adoption of Ordinance No. 1305, as codified in Chapter 15.72. "Pass-through fees" mean those development impact and other fees and charges that are either: (i) imposed by another public or private entity, collected by the city and distributed to such other entity, or (ii) imposed and collected by the city pursuant to a contractual or statutory obligation for the benefit of another public or private entity. For example, school fees.
"Qualifying project" means a development that meets all of the criteria as set forth in subsections 1 through 4 of this definition:
The development meets one of the following requirements:
Large Commercial Retail Development. A new development primarily intended and approved for occupancy and use by one or more significant sales tax generators. A development will be deemed to meet this requirement where the project: (i) was approved as a commercial retail development; (ii) consists of the construction of one or more buildings suitable for large commercial retail enterprises; (iii) such buildings are constructed on at least one and one-half contiguous acres of area to be developed; and (iv) eighty percent of the gross square footage of the buildings (including covered or enclosed outdoor sales areas) constructed shall be occupied by one or more significant sales tax generators. For the purposes of this subsection, property shall be considered as contiguous even if separated by roads, streets, utilities easements or railroad rights-ofway or other dedicated rights-of-way. For purposes of this subsection, the "area to be 10/2/25, 9:57 AM Banning, CA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 2/15
218
b.
2. 3.
4. developed" means the area of the development that encloses all of the privately developed and owned improvements, including private circulation improvements, landscaped areas and parking areas; or Vehicle Dealership. A development primarily intended and approved for occupancy and use as a vehicle dealership. A development will be deemed to meet this requirement where the project: (a) was approved as a vehicle dealership; (b) consists of the construction of one or more buildings and related improvements suitable for operation by at least two vehicle dealerships, franchises or dealer points; (c) such buildings and improvements are constructed on at least three contiguous acres of area to be developed; and (d) vehicle showrooms, sales offices and outdoor vehicle display areas, considered together, equal or exceed the gross square footage of buildings occupied for vehicle service and/or storage. For purposes of this subsection, property shall be considered as contiguous even if separated by roads, streets, utilities easements or railroad rights-ofway or other publicly dedicated rights-of-way. For purposes of this subsection, the "area to be developed" means the area of the vehicle dealership that encloses all of the privately developed and owned improvements, including private circulation improvements, landscaped areas, vehicle display and storage areas, and parking areas.
The development is located entirely within the D&M or SLB economic zones.
The development will be consistent with all applicable land use laws, regulations, and development requirements contained within the city's general plan (as amended from time to time), any applicable specific plan (as amended from time to time), and this Code (as amended from time to time).
The application for the first discretionary approval required for the development has been deemed complete as of or after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter. "Significant sales tax generator" means any use or combination of uses located in a development that is projected, by the city in its sole and absolute discretion, to generate not less than fifty thousand dollars per year in local sales taxes to be received by the city in accordance with the Bradley-Burns Uniform Sales and Use Tax Law (Revenue and Taxation Code 7200, et seq.), as it may be amended or substituted. "Transportation uniform mitigation fee program" means the development impact fee imposed and levied under City of Banning Ordinance No. 1291 adopting the "Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program." This program establishes a fee known as the transportation uniform mitigation fee (TUMF). The purpose of the TUMF is to mitigate the traffic impacts of local development on, and to provide funds for the improvement and expansion of, existing and planned regional transportation and circulation facilities (including, but not limited to, regionally significant state, county, and local, arterials, highways, and freeways) within Riverside County or such other subregion of Riverside County, the boundaries of which exceed the 10/2/25, 9:57 AM Banning, CA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 3/15
219
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
boundaries of the City of Banning as they exist on the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter and as they may hereafter be expanded by approved annexation. The city has decided to participate in this regional program through the adoption of Ordinance No. 1291. "Vehicle dealership" means any development which will provide for the franchised sale, lease and servicing of new and used motor vehicles, trucks, recreational vehicles, off-road vehicles, boats and other personal watercraft together with such ancillary uses such as administrative offices, automobile inventory storage, and parts sales.
(Code 1965, § 29-7.)
(Ord. No. 1551, § 3, 9-24-19; Ord. No. 1602, § 2, 4-9-24)
3.36.030 - "Costs reasonably borne" defined.
"Costs reasonably borne," as used and ordered to be applied in this chapter are to consist of the following elements:
All applicable direct costs including, but not limited to salaries, wages, fringe benefits, service and supplies, operation expenses, contracted services, special supplies, and any other direct expense incurred.
All applicable indirect costs including, but not restricted to, building maintenance and operations, equipment maintenance, communication, printing and reproduction, and like expenses when distributed on a rational proration system.
Fixed assets recovery expenses, consisting of depreciation of fixed assets, and additional fixed asset expense recovery charges calculated on the current estimated cost of replacement, divided by the approximate life expectancy of the fixed asset. A further additional charge to make up the depreciation not previously recovered and reserved in cash also shall be calculated and considered a cost so as to recover such unrecovered depreciation over the remaining life of the asset.
General overhead, expressed as a percentage, distributing and charging the expenses of the city council, city manager, administrative services (finance) department, city clerk, city treasurer, city attorney's office, personnel office, risk management; City Hall, and all other staff and support service provided to the entire city organization.
Departmental overhead, expressed as a percentage, distributing and charging the cost of each department head and his or her supporting expenses as enumerated in subsections A, B, and C of this section.
(Code 1965, § 29-3.)
3.36.040 - Delegation of authority and direction to city manager. 10/2/25, 9:57 AM Banning, CA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 4/15
220
A.
B.
A.
The city manager is directed to annually/seasonally review fees and charges to recover the percentage of costs reasonably borne in providing the regulation products or services enumerated in this chapter in the percentage of costs reasonably borne and on the schedule of rate review and revision as hereinafter established in this chapter and recommend changes to the city council for adoption.
"Costs reasonably borne" shall be defined in Section 3.36.030. In adjusting fees and charges, the city manager shall act in an administrative and ministerial capacity and shall consider only the standards and criteria established by this chapter.
(Code 1965, § 29-2.)
3.36.050 - Public meeting.
Pursuant to the requirements of California Government Code Section 54992, the city clerk has caused notice to be provided as set out in the Government Code Section 54992, and the city council has received at a public meeting oral and written presentations concerning the fees and charges proposed for those categories of fees and charges set out in Government Code Sections 54990 and 54991. Such notice, oral and written presentation receipt, and public meeting shall be provided by the city council prior to the city manager taking any action on any new or increased fees or charges for those categories set out in the Government Code Sections 54990 and 54991 and Section 3.36.080(A) of this chapter. (Code 1965, § 29-5.)
3.36.060 - Provision of data.
Pursuant to Section 54992 of the California Government Code, the city manager shall, at least ten days prior to the required public meeting set out in the Government Code section, make available to the public indicating the cost, or estimated cost required to provide the services set out in Government Code Sections 54990 and 54991.
(Code 1965, § 29-6.)
3.36.070 - Fees for qualifying projects.
Repeal of Development Impact Fees. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Code or any other city ordinance or resolution, no development impact fees are applicable to, and except as is expressly provided in subsection H of this section, the imposition and levy of development impact fees against qualifying projects are repealed and no development impact fee shall be levied against a qualifying project and payment of development impact fees shall not be made a condition of approval of any qualifying project.
10/2/25, 9:57 AM Banning, CA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 5/15
221
B.
C.
D.
E.
1. 2.
F.
Nothing in this section shall be deemed or shall operate to limit, modify or abridge the obligation of any developer of a qualifying project with respect to the payment of ad valorem taxes, special taxes or assessments, fees and charges for utility services, and/or similar or dissimilar nondevelopment-related charges. Nothing in this section shall be deemed or shall operate to limit, modify or abridge the discretion of the city council (or its subordinate boards and commissions) with respect to the processing, conditioning, approval or denying of any application for a discretionary within the limits of such discretion provided by law to the city council (or its subordinate boards and commissions) with respect to such matters. Nothing in this section shall be deemed a representation, warranty or commitment by the city to approve, impose and/or delete any condition(s) with respect to the approval of any application for a discretionary, except to the limited extent as set forth in subsections A and B of this section.
Pass-Through Fees. Notwithstanding subsections A and B of this section, any qualifying project shall pay and be responsible for any and all pass-through fees applicable to such qualifying project, including but not limited to MSHCP and TUMF.
Applicability. The provisions of subsection A of this section shall not apply to: (1) any portion(s) of a development which is (are) not a qualifying project; and (2) any residential component of a qualifying project.
In each such case described in this section, the nonqualifying project or residential component shall pay as applicable: (i) if such nonqualifying portion(s) and/or residential component is (are) capable of receiving independent discretionary approvals separate and apart from the qualifying project, all fees and charges required of the nonqualifying portion(s) and/or residential component by city ordinance, resolution, or this Code; or (ii) if such nonqualifying portion(s) and/or residential component is (are) not capable of receiving discretionary approvals separate and apart from the qualifying project, a prorate percentage (based on the percentage that the gross square footage of the nonqualifying portion(s) and/or residential component represents to the gross square footage of the development as a whole of the fees and charges which would be required of the qualifying project by city ordinance, resolution, or this Code but for the application of subsection A of this section.
Sunset. The provisions of subsection A of this section shall not apply to any discretionary approval for a qualifying project as to which the application for such discretionary approval is not deemed complete (either by the city or by operation of law) after the earlier of the following:
As to a qualifying project, December 31, 2010; or
The date on which the city council, its sole and absolute discretion, rescinds or modifies the provisions of this section.
Fair Share. This section shall not have the effect of requiring any person or entity to pay more than that person's or entity's "fair share" of the costs attributable to development by that person or entity. For purposes of any study or analysis conducted by the city following the effective date 10/2/25, 9:57 AM Banning, CA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 6/15
222
G.
H.
I.
of the ordinance codified in this chapter which first added this section to the Code, to determine the amount of developer impact fees required to offset the costs attributable to any development within the city, all qualifying projects shall be deemed by the city to have paid all development impact and other fees which may have been imposed by the city against such project but for the provisions of subsection C of this section.
Condition to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. If a development which was a qualified project at the time of the application of subsection A of this section to such development is no longer a qualifying project as of the issuance of any certificate of occupancy for such development due to any reason other than an affirmative legislative action of the city which causes the development to fail to meet any of the criteria for a qualifying project as set forth in Section 3.36.020 of this chapter, then the developer shall pay to the city as a condition to the issuance of such certificate of occupancy an amount equal to the full amount of fees and/or charges which would have been payable with respect to such development but for the operation of subsection A of this section.
No Vested Rights. This section is not intended to and shall not create any vested right, entitlement or privilege in any person or entity. This section may be enforced solely through a writ of mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085. The city council may amend, terminate, suspend or abrogate all or any provisions of this section at any time and for any reason within the limits of the discretion afforded the city council by law with respect to legislative matters. Any such amendment, termination, suspension or abrogation shall be applicable to any application for a discretionary approval for a qualifying project which is deemed complete (by the city or by operation of law) on or after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter enacting such amendment, termination, suspension or abrogation.
No Representation Regarding Labor Code Matters. Nothing in this section or elsewhere in this Code is or is intended to be a representation or affirmation to any developer or other entity concerning the application of any provision of the California Labor Code, including, without implied limitation, Labor Code Sections 1720 and 1773. Any party availing itself of the benefits of this section agrees to and shall comply with any applicable provisions of state and federal labor laws and regulatory requirements, including those applicable to public works. Further, as a condition to receiving the benefits of the alternate fee schedule as set forth in this section, any party receiving the benefits thereof shall be deemed to have agreed to and shall defend, indemnify and hold the city and its respective officers, officials, employees, agents, attorneys and contractors harmless from and against all liability, cost and expense alleged against or incurred by the city or the other indemnified parties as a result of that party's failure to comply with the provisions of this subsection.
(Code 1965, § 29-7.1.)
3.36.080 - Schedule of fees and service charges.
10/2/25, 9:57 AM Banning, CA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 7/15
223
A.
The city manager, finance director and each city department head, under the direction of the city manager, shall review the fees and service charges listed following, on the schedule of frequency listed in this section, and set and adjust the fee or charge schedule so as to recover the listed percentage of costs reasonably borne necessary to provide the listed regulation, product or service.
Development Services:
Regulation, Product or Service Percentage of Costs
Reasonably Borne to be
Recovered
Review
Schedule
Number Service Center
S-1 Bldg. plan checking 100% Annual
S-2 Bldg. construction insp. 100% Annual
S-3 Mobile home inspection 100% Annual
S-4 Improvement inspection 100% Annual
S-5 Plan storage 100% Annual
S-6 Special inspections 100% Annual
S-7 Energy conserv. insp. 100% Annual
S-8 Zone change review 100% Annual
S-9 Variance review 100% Annual
S-10 Conditional use review 100% Annual
S-11 Lane use review 100% Annual
S-12 Gen. plan amend. review 100% Annual
S-13 Specific plan review 100% Annual
10/2/25, 9:57 AM Banning, CA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 8/15
224
S-14 Lot line review 100% Annual
S-15 Tentative sub. & parcel map review 100% Annual
S-16 Time extension review 100% Annual
S-17 Appeal processing 100% Annual
S-18 Zone text amend. rev. 100% Annual
S-19 Review cond. use text amendment 100% Annual
S-20 Environmental review 100% Annual
S-21 Project design review 100% Annual
S-22 Sign review 100% Annual
S-23 Subdivision plan check 100% Annual
S-24 Subdivision inspection 100% Annual
S-25 Record of survey plan check 100% Annual
S-26 Improvement plan check 100% Annual
S-27 Service availability cert. 100% Annual
S-28 Deed preparation 100% Annual
S-29 Development flood rev. 100% Annual
S-30 Public works insp. 100% Annual
S-31 Encroachment permit review 100% Annual
S-32 Street cut inspection 100% Annual
10/2/25, 9:57 AM Banning, CA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 9/15
225
B.
S-33 Street/all abandonment review 100% Annual
S-34 Parcel map plan check 100% Annual
S-35 Preliminary proj. check 100% Annual
S-36 Annexation review 100% Annual
S-37 Developer agreement preparation 100% Annual
Public Safety Services:
Regulation, Product or Service Percentage of Costs
Reasonably Borne to be
Recovered
Review
Schedule
Number Service Center
S-38 Vehicle code enforce. Per municipal court bail &
fine schedule
Annual
S-39 City ord. enforcement Per municipal court bail &
fine schedule
Annual
S-40 Automotive accident investigation 30% Annual
S-41 Spec. police services 40% Annual
S-42 False alarm response* 100% Annual
S-43 Police records check 20% Annual
S-44 Business regulation 100% Annual
S-45 Animal regulation 50% Annual
10/2/25, 9:57 AM Banning, CA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 10/15
226
C.
S-46 Police photo develop. 100% Annual
S-47 Bicycle licensing 100% per State law Annual
S-48 Forest resource mgmt. 50% Annual
S-49 Fire system review & inspection 100% Annual
S-50 New business fire hazard insp. 100% Annual
S-51 Low hazard fire insp. 50% Annual
S-52 State mandated fire inspections 100% Annual
S-53 Fire inspection of existing
businesses
100% Annual
S-54 Operational Fire Permits 100% Annual
S-55 Fire code permit insp. 100% Annual
S-56 Fire suppression cost recovery 100% Annual
S-57 EMT service 50% Annual
S-58 Hazardous material record
location
100% Annual
* Per a regulatory ordinance to be passed by the city council.
Parks and Recreation Services:
Regulation, Product or Service Percentage of Costs
Reasonably Borne to be
Recovered or Direct
Variable Program Costs
Review
Schedule
10/2/25, 9:57 AM Banning, CA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 11/15
227
Number Service Center
S-57 Swim pool public oper. 100 % of direct variable
program costs
Annual
S-58 Swimming lessons 100 % of direct variable
program costs
Annual
S-59 Swim pool rental 50% Costs Reasonably
Borne to be Recovered
Annual
S-60 Youth sports league oper. 100 % of direct variable program costs
Seasonal
S-61 Adult sports league oper. 50% Costs Reasonably
Borne to be Recovered
Annual
S-62 Community center maint. &
operation
50% Costs Reasonably
Borne to be Recovered
Annual
S-63 Youth recreation classes 25% Costs Reasonably
Borne to be Recovered
Seasonal
S-64 Adult recreation classes 75% Costs Reasonably
Borne to be Recovered
Seasonal
S-65 Senior citizen program 10% Costs Reasonably
Borne to be Recovered
Annual
S-66 Park facility maint. and operation 100% Costs Reasonably Borne to be Recovered
Annual
S-67 Stagecoach days community
celebration
0% Costs Reasonably Borne
to be Recovered
Annual
10/2/25, 9:57 AM Banning, CA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 12/15
228
D.
S-68 Noncity ballfield use 50% Costs Reasonably
Borne to be Recovered
Annual
S-69 Day camp(s) 100 % of direct variable
program costs
Annual
Utility and Enterprise Services:
Regulation, Product or Service Percentage of Costs
Reasonably Borne to be
Recovered
Review
Schedule
Number Service Center
S-75 Transit service 20% Annual
S-76 Dial-a-ride 5% Annual
S-77 Water service turn-on 100% Annual
S-78 Water meter installation 100% Annual
S-79 Water service 100% Annual
S-80 Delinquent account reconnection 46% Annual
S-81 Water meter testing 100% Annual
S-82 Electric service turn-on 31% Annual
S-83 Temporary pole erection 100% Annual
S-84 Electric service 100% Semi-Annual
S-85 Delinquent account reconnection 42% Annual
10/2/25, 9:57 AM Banning, CA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 13/15
229
E.
S-86 Electric meter testing 0% Annual
S-87 Electric service cut 56% Annual
S-88 Wastewater service 100% Annual
S-89 Sewer connection investigation 0% Annual
S-90 Sewer stoppage investigation 0% Annual
S-91 Refuse collection and disposal 100% Annually
every June
1st, based on
CPI and/or
when dump
fees or other
governmental
fees or taxes
are adjusted
(refer to
Refuse
Collection
Agreement
dated May 23,
1978,
Sections 11 A
and B)
Maintenance Services:
Regulation, Product or Service Percentage of Costs
Reasonably Borne to be
Recovered
Review
Schedule
10/2/25, 9:57 AM Banning, CA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 14/15
230
F.
Number Service Center
S-92 Utility Street Use 100% Annual
Finance or Administrative Services:
Regulation, Product or Service Percentage of Costs
Reasonably Borne to be
Recovered
Review
Schedule
Number Service Center
S-99 Document printing 100% Annual
S-100 Returned check processing 100% Annual
S-101 Photocopying 100% Annual
S-102 Certification of docs and info 100% Annual
S-103 Research on request 100% Annual
S-104 Mailing agendas and minutes 100% Annual
S-105 New service 100% At inception
All fees and charges set pursuant to this chapter and section shall take effect immediately. (Code 1965, § 29-4; Ord. No. 1599, § 2, 2-13-24; Ord. No. 1602, § 3, 4-9-24) 10/2/25, 9:57 AM Banning, CA Code of Ordinances
about:blank 15/15
231