Agenda packet, regular meeting — Banning City Council, December 9, 2025 (part 4 of 4)

RESOLUTION 2025-174

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA, MAKING

FINDINGS FOR UNEXPENDED DEVELOPMENT FEES IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66000 AND REVIEWING AND ACCEPTING ANNUAL

DEVELOPMENT FEE DISCLOSURE INFORMATION
WHEREAS, the Mitigation Fee Act, Government Code Section 66000 et seq., authorizes the City to impose, collect, and expend mitigation fees to offset the impacts of development within the City; and
WHEREAS, among the procedural requirements mandated by the Mitigation Fee act is a requirement that each year the City make specified findings regarding any portion of fees that remain unexpended; and
WHEREAS, the City has deposited all development impact fees received into separate non-comingled capital facilities funds, and each capital facilities fees fund is for separate purpose; and
WHEREAS, the City has the following development impact fee types: General Facilities, Police Facilities, Fire Facilities, Traffic Facilities, Park Development, Water Capital Facilities and Wastewater Capital Facilities; and WHEREAS, the City also wishes to memorialize that is has made public certain information pursuant to the annual information disclosure requirements of Government Code Section 66006(b), including but not limited to the amount of the fee, the beginning and ending balance in each fee fund, and the interest thereon.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

The recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 1. The City Council has considered the information contained herein including the staff report and the City of Banning Government Code 66000 et seq Annual and FiveYear Reporting for Fiscal Year 2024-25 (attached as Exhibit A).

SECTION 2. The City Council has reviewed and made findings consistent with the City of Banning Government Code 66000 et seq Annual and Five-Year Reporting for Fiscal Year 2024-25 (attached as Exhibit A).

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of December, 2025. 767
Resolution 2025-174

Page 2 of 4 ends

, Mayor
City of Banning
ATTEST:

Sandra Calderon,
Acting Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

John Pinkney, City Attorney
Slovak, Baron, Empey, Murphy & Pinkney,
LLP
768
Resolution 2025-174

Page 3 of 4 ends

CERTIFICATION:

I, Sandra Calderon, Acting Deputy City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2025-174, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 9th day of December, 2025 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Sandra Calderon, Acting Deputy City Clerk,
City of Banning, California
769
Resolution 2025-174

Page 4 of 4 ends

EXHIBIT A
City of Banning Government Code 66000 et seq Annual and Five-Year Reporting for Fiscal Year 2024-25
770
City of Banning
Government Code 66000 et seq
Annual and Five-Year Reporting
For Fiscal Year 2024-25
771
[AUTHOR NAME] 2
Table of Contents
Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 Requirements for Development Impact Fee Reporting ............................................................. 3 Annual Reporting Requirements ................................................................................................ 3 Five-Year Reporting Requirements............................................................................................. 4 Development Impact Fees.............................................................................................................. 4 Police Facilities Development Fee .............................................................................................. 5 Annual Findings....................................................................................................................... 5 Five-Year Finding..................................................................................................................... 7 Fire Facilities Development Fee.................................................................................................. 8 Annual Findings....................................................................................................................... 8 Five-Year Finding................................................................................................................... 10 General Facilities Development Fee ......................................................................................... 11 Annual Findings.................................................................................................................... 11 Five-Year Finding................................................................................................................... 13 Park Facilities Development Fee............................................................................................... 14 Annual Findings..................................................................................................................... 14 Five-Year Finding................................................................................................................... 15 Traffic Facilities Development Fee............................................................................................ 16 Annual Findings..................................................................................................................... 16 Five-Year Finding................................................................................................................... 18 Water Capital Facilities Development Fee................................................................................ 19 Annual Findings..................................................................................................................... 19 Five-Year Finding................................................................................................................... 20 Wastewater Capital Facilities Development Fee...................................................................... 22 Annual Findings..................................................................................................................... 22 Five-Year Finding................................................................................................................... 23 Appendix I ..................................................................................................................................... 25 772
[AUTHOR NAME] 3
Introduction
In California, State legislation sets certain legal and procedural parameters for the charging of development impact fees. This legislation was passed as AB1600 by the California Legislature and is now codified as California Government Code (GC) Sections 66000 through 66025 (“Mitigation Fee Act”). This State law went into effect on January 1, 1989.

Requirements for Development Impact Fee Reporting
The Mitigation Fee Act imposes certain accounting and reporting requirements with respect to the fees collected. The fees must be deposited in a special account to avoid co-mingling the fees with the City’s other revenues or funds. Interest on each development fee fund or account must be credited to that fund or account and used only for those purposes for which the fees were collected.

The Mitigation Fee Act also requires any local agency that imposes development impact fees to prepare an annual report, with annual findings and five-year findings, that provides specific information about those fees. This report serves both of those functions and has been prepared for the fiscal year (FY) ended June 30, 2025, in accordance with the provisions of the California Government Code Section 66006 (b) and 66001 (d).

In addition to development impact fees, the City also collects water and wastewater capacity (connection) fees. Connection fees are typically related to utilities, such as water or wastewater, and are used to cover costs associated with expanding the associated infrastructure systems to accommodate increased demand by new development. Although connection fees are subject to different requirements than other impact fees under the Mitigation Fee Act, they are included in the annual report.

Annual Reporting Requirements
The annual reporting requirements under GC66006 include the following requirements:
(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund (B) The amount of the fee
(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund and the amount of the fees collected and the interest earned
(D) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees (E) (i) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have 773
[AUTHOR NAME] 4
been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement and the public improvement remains incomplete
(ii) An identification of each public improvement identified in a previous report pursuant to clause (i) and whether construction began on the approximate date noted in the previous report
(iii) For a project identified pursuant to clause (ii) for which construction did not commence by the approximate date provided in the previous report, the reason for the delay and a revised approximate date that the local agency will commence construction
(F) A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund (G) The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 66001 Five-Year Reporting Requirements
On the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into the fund, and every five years thereafter, the City is required to make the following findings under GC66001. These findings are for the portion of the fee fund remaining unexpended, whether committed or uncommitted. (H) Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put
(I) Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged
(J) Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of incomplete improvements and designate the approximate dates on which the funding is expected to be deposited
Development Impact Fees
The City collects a variety of development impact fees set under the provisions of Government Code 66000. Fees were set in two studies completed in 2019 by LSA Associates for traffic fees and Wildan and Associates for all other impact fees.

Following is a description of each of the fees charged by the City and subject to annual and fiveyear reporting requirements. The number preceding the fee description is the fund where fees are tracked.
(400) Police Facilities Development: This fund was created to mitigate the cost of needed additional police facilities resulting from new development that has increased the City’s population. Expenditures from this fund are restricted to the development of new, or expansion of existing, police sites and the acquisition of capital equipment such as vehicles. 774
[AUTHOR NAME] 5
(410) Fire Facility Development: This fund has been created to record the financial activities related to the increased fire service level impact resulting from new development. The fee is collected at the time a building permit is requested. The fees are used to mitigate the cost of increased service levels resulting from additional population. The fees can be used to develop additional fire stations or acquire additional capital projects. (420) Traffic Fee: Traffic Control Facilities Fees are the impact fees paid by new developments for construction of traffic signals at various locations within the City. (430) General Facilities: This fund has been created to reserve funds obtained from new developments to update the City’s General Plan and to construct City Hall Annex. Fees are collected at the time a building permit is issued and are intended to update the City Hall Facilities. (451) Park Development: The Park Development Fund is used for the acquisition and development of parks and recreation facilities. Functions include land acquisition, planning and design, grant funding acquisition, identification and administration of rehabilitation and improvement projects, establishment and collection of developer fees, and development of leases.
(661) Water Capital Facility Fee: The Water Capital Facility Fees are a one-time charge collected from new developments or existing developments requesting new services from the City’s Water Distribution System. The fees collected can be utilized for the Water Department Capital Improvement Programs.
(681) Wastewater Capital Facility Fees: The Wastewater Capital Facility Fee is a one-time charge collected from new developments or existing developments requesting new services from the City’s wastewater collection system. The fees collected can be utilized for Wastewater Division Capital Improvement Programs.

The following section of the report provides both the annual report requirements as well as any five-year report requirements for each applicable impact fee fund.

Police Facilities Development Fee
Annual Findings
A. This fund was created to mitigate the cost of needed additional police facilities resulting from new development that has increased the City’s population. Expenditures from this fund are restricted to the development of new, or expansion of existing, police sites and the acquisition of capital equipment such as vehicles.

B. The current fees are:
775
[AUTHOR NAME] 6
Land Use Current Fee
Single-Family Unit $1,200/unit
Multi-family Unit $982/unit
Commercial $351/1,000 sf
Office $458/1,000 sf
Industrial $170/1,000 sf
C. The Police Facilities Fee Fund had the following activity in FY25. This includes the beginning and ending fund balance, new fees collected, interest earned, and total expenditures made.

D. An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees:

No fees were expended in fiscal year 2024-25.

The Police Facilities fee is based on the “existing inventory”1 approach to determine impacts from new development. No specific projects are identified under this approach. Over the last five years the City has collected $825,371. A total of over $11 million in facility expense was identified based on the “existing inventory” method in

1 Impact fee study for Police, Fire, Parkland and Parks, General City, Wastewater, and Water facilities was performed by Wildan Financial Services in 2019. The different cost approaches used for these fees is described in that study.

Fund 400 - Police Facilities FY24-25
Beginning Balance 305,249
Fees Collected 554,400
lnterest Earned 771
Other
Expenditures -
Estimated Ending Fund Balance 860,419
5 Year Finding 35,048
776
[AUTHOR NAME] 7
the impact fee study. The City is currently evaluating the possibility of reusing a former City Fire station to expand Police services. Facilities fees may be used for any needed improvements associated with the above facility reuse.

F. A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, that date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan:

No interfund transfers or loans were made utilizing these funds during fiscal year 2024-25
G. The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001:

No refunds were made during fiscal year 2024-25
Five-Year Finding
The City has $35,048 in unexpended funds from five years ago from the Police Facility Fees.

H. Identify the purpose to which the fee will be put:

The City plans to use this fee revenue to pay for the debt service on the existing police headquarters. The City can also use police facilities fee revenues for the construction or purchase of buildings, equipment and land that are part of the system of police facilities serving new development. In addition, the City is currently evaluating the possibility of reusing a former City Fire station to expand Police services. Facilities fees may be used for any needed improvements associated with the above facility reuse.

I. Demonstrate the reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged:

All new development in the City impacts public facilities. Moreover, each individual development project and its related increase in population and employment, along with the cumulative impacts of all development in the City, will adversely impact existing facilities. Thus, imposition of the fee to finance the public facilities is an efficient, practical, and equitable method of permitting development to proceed in a responsible manner. Section 66000 of the Government Code requires that a reasonable relationship exists between the need for public facilities and the type of development on which a fee is imposed. The need for public facilities is related to the level of service demanded, which varies in proportion to the equivalent dwelling units (“EDUs”) generated by a 777
[AUTHOR NAME] 8
particular land use type.

J. Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of incomplete improvements for which impact fees are to be used:

The Police Facility Fees are set based on a proportional share of existing facilities to ensure that future police facilities are paid for by future development. Therefore, there is no additional funding identified in the fee study for these projects.

K. Designate the approximate dates on which the funding necessary to complete financing of those improvements will be deposited into the appropriate account or fund:

The date of impact fee collection and deposit of funding is difficult to predict and will depend on the timing of each specific developer and on the relative economic conditions. As such, the City is unable to predict when all such development impact fees will be accumulated and will continue to provide updates as additional information and fees are collected. As part of the budget process, the City identifies public improvement projects that have sufficient impact fee funds available and the approximate dates (fiscal year) of construction. This information is included in the Capital Improvement Program which is adopted by City Council as part of the overall budget adoption process. Estimated dates of when complete financing will be available, as well as the estimated project start date are included below. The estimated start year will have an impact on whether or not the project moves forward with full impact fee funding or requires supplement funding.

Fire Facilities Development Fee
Annual Findings
A. This fund has been created to record the financial activities related to the increased fire service level impact resulting from new development. The fee is collected at the time a building permit is requested. The fees are used to mitigate the cost of increased service levels resulting from additional population. The fees can be used to develop additional fire stations or acquire additional capital projects.

B. The current Fire fees are:
778
[AUTHOR NAME] 9
Land Use Current Fee
Single-Family Unit $746/unit
Multi-family Unit $610/unit
Commercial $486/1,000 sf
Office $633/1,000 sf
Industrial $236/1,000 sf
C. The Fire Facilities Fee Fund had the following activity in FY25:

No fees were expended in fiscal year 2024-25.

The Fire Facilities fee is based on the “existing inventory” approach to determine impacts from new development. No specific projects are identified under this approach. Over the last five years the City has collected $711,023. A total of over $11 million in facility expense was identified based on the “existing inventory” method. The City will utilize funds beginning in January 2026 for rehabilitation of Fire Station No. 2 for use by Battalion Chiefs and eventual reuse as full fire station. The City has also identified the need for a new Fire station south of Interstate 10 with an estimated cost of $15,000,000.

Fund 410 - Fire Facilities FY24-25
Beginning Balance 1,441,108
Fees Collected 344,652
lnterest Earned 3,638
Other
Expenditures -
Estimated Ending Fund Balance 1,789,398
5 Year Finding 1,078,375
779
[AUTHOR NAME] 1
0 F. A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, that date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan:

No interfund transfers or loans were made utilizing these funds during fiscal year 2024-25.

G. The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001:

No refunds were made during fiscal year 2024-25.

Five-Year Finding
The City has $1,078,375 in unexpended funds from five years ago in the Fire Facilities Fees Fund.

H. Identify the purpose to which the fee will be put:

The purpose of the Fire impact fee is to fund the fire protection facilities needed to serve new development. An impact fee is presented based on the existing facilities standard of fire protection facilities per capital.

I. Demonstrate the reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged:

All new development in the City has an impact on public facilities. Moreover, each individual development project and its related increase in population and employment, along with the cumulative impacts of all development in the City, will adversely impact existing facilities. Thus, imposition of the fee to finance the public facilities is an efficient, practical, and equitable method of permitting development to proceed in a responsible manner. Section 66000 of the Government Code requires that a reasonable relationship exists between the need for public facilities and the type of development on which a fee is imposed. The need for public facilities is related to the level of service demanded, which varies in proportion to the equivalent dwelling units (“EDUs”) generated by a particular land use type.

J. Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of incomplete improvements for which impact fees are to be used:

The Fire fees will be based on the demand from new development. The City has not identified other sources of funding for these facilities. 780
[AUTHOR NAME] 1
1 K. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete:

General Facilities Development Fee
Annual Findings
A. This fund has been created to reserve funds obtained from new development to update the City’s General Plan and to construct City Hall Annex. Fees are collected at the time a building permit is issued and are intended to update the City Hall Facilities.

B. The current General Facilities fees are:

Land Use Current Fee
Single-Family Unit $521/unit
Multi-family Unit $426/unit
Commercial $493/1,000 sf
Office $643/1,000 sf
Industrial $239/1,000 sf
781
[AUTHOR NAME] 1
2 C. The General Facilities Fee Fund had the following activity in FY25:

The City spent $1,800 spent on the “City Manager office reconfiguration” project in fiscal year 2024-25. One hundred percent of this project was funded with fees.

The General Facilities fee is based on the “existing inventory” approach to determine impacts from new development. No specific projects are identified under this approach. Over the last five years, the City has collected $544,683. A total of over $12.02 million in facility expense was identified based on the “existing inventory” method, with $6.3 million to come from impact fees and $6.8 million to come from other sources. Planned facilities include a new City Hall and a new Corporate Yard.

No interfund transfers or loans were made utilizing these funds during fiscal year 2023-24.

G. The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001:

No refunds were made during fiscal year 2024-25.

Fund 430 - Gen'l Facilities FY24-25
Beginning Balance 499,229
Fees Collected 275,352
lnterest Earned 1,279
Other
Expenditures (1,800)
Estimated Ending Fund Balance 774,060
5 Year Finding 194,727
782
[AUTHOR NAME] 1
3 Five-Year Finding
The City has $194,727 in unexpended funds from five years ago from the General Facilities Fees.

H. Identify the purpose to which the fee will be put:

The City plans to use general facilities fee revenue to construct improvements to add to the system of general city facilities to serve new development. Improvements include construction or purchase of buildings, equipment and land that are part of the system of general city facilities serving new development. The City is currently out to bid with City Hall HVAC system upgrades that will utilize this funding source.

I. Demonstrate the reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged:

All new development in the City impacts public facilities. Moreover, each individual development project and its related increase in population and employment, along with the cumulative impacts of all development in the City, will adversely impact existing facilities. Thus, imposition of the fee is an efficient, practical, and equitable method of permitting development to proceed in a responsible manner. Section 66000 of the Government Code requires that a reasonable relationship exists between the need for public facilities and the type of development on which a fee is imposed. The need for public facilities is related to the level of service demanded, which varies in proportion to the equivalent dwelling units (“EDUs”) generated by a particular land use type.

J. Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of incomplete improvements for which impact fees are to be used:

The General Facilities Fees are set based on a proportional share of existing facilities to ensure that future general facilities are paid for by future development. Therefore, there is no additional funding identified in the fee study for these projects.

K. Designate the approximate dates on which the funding necessary to complete financing of those improvements will be deposited into the appropriate account or fund:

The date of impact fee collection and deposit of funding is difficult to predict and will depend on the timing of each specific developer and on the relative economic conditions. As such, the City is unable to predict when allsuch development impact fees will be accumulated and will continue to provide updates as additional information and fees are collected. As part of the budget process, the City identifies public improvement projects that have sufficient impact fee funds available and the approximate dates 783
[AUTHOR NAME] 1
4 (fiscal year) of construction. This information is included in the Capital Improvement Program which is adopted by City Council as part of the overall budget adoption process.

Park Facilities Development Fee
Annual Findings
A. The purpose of the parkland and parks impact fee is to fund the parkland and parks facilities needed to serve new development. The maximum justified impact fee is presented based on the existing plan standard of parkland and parks per capita.

B. The current Park fees are:

Land Use Current Fee
Single-Family Unit $3,840/unit
Multi-family Unit $3,142/unit
C. The Park Facilities Fee Fund had the following activity in FY25:

The City spent $95,671 related to Lion’s Park lighting project debt service. One hundred percent of this project was funded with fees.

E. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified Fund 451 - Park Facilities FY24-25
Beginning Balance 300,126
Fees Collected 367,107
lnterest Earned 758
Other
Expenditures (95,671)
Estimated Ending Fund Balance 572,320
5 Year Finding (45,616)
784
[AUTHOR NAME] 1
5 in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete:

The Park Facilities fee is based on the “existing inventory” approach to determine impacts from new development. No specific projects are identified under this approach. Over the last five years the City has collected over $617,936 in impact fees.

Total improvements will depend on total growth as the fee is based on parks’ cost per capita.

No interfund transfers or loans were made utilizing these funds during fiscal year 2023-24.

G. The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001:

No refunds were made during fiscal year 2024-25.

Five-Year Finding
The City has no accumulation of unexpended funds from five years ago from the General Facilities Fees.

H. Identify the purpose to which the fee will be put:

The City plans to use parkland and parks fee revenue to purchase parkland or construct improvements to add to the system of park facilities that serves new development. The City may only use impact fee revenue to provide facilities and intensify usage of existing facilities needed to serve new development.

I. Demonstrate the reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged:

All new development in the City impacts public facilities. Moreover, each individual development project and its related increase in population and employment, along with the cumulative impacts of all development in the City, will adversely impact existing facilities. Thus, imposition of the fee is an efficient, practical, and equitable method of permitting development to proceed in a responsible manner. Section 66000 of the Government Code requires that a reasonable relationship exists between the need for public facilities and the type of development on which a fee is imposed. The need for 785
[AUTHOR NAME] 1
6 public facilities is related to the level of service demanded, which varies in proportion to the equivalent dwelling units (“EDUs”) generated by a particular land use type.

J. Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of incomplete improvements for which impact fees are to be used:

The Park Fees are set based on a proportional share of existing facilities to ensure that future park facilities are paid for by future development. Therefore, there is no additional funding identified in the fee study for these projects.

K. Designate the approximate dates on which the funding necessary to complete financing of those improvements will be deposited into the appropriate account or fund:

The date of impact fee collection and deposit of funding is difficult to predict and will depend on the timing of each specific developer and on the relative economic conditions. As such, the City is unable to predict when allsuch development impact fees will be accumulated and will continue to provide updates as additional information and fees are collected. As part of the budget process, the City identifies public improvement projects that have sufficient impact fee funds available and the approximate dates (fiscal year) of construction. This information is included in the Capital Improvement Program which is adopted by City Council as part of the overall budget adoption process.

Traffic Facilities Development Fee
Annual Findings
A. Traffic Control Facilities Fees are the impact fees paid by the new developments for construction of traffic control projects at various locations within the City.

B. The current fees are shown in Table F of the LSA Associates 2019 report. 2 The land uses
not in this table are charged at the rate shown in the table below.

Land Uses not in Table F Current Fee
Per Daily Trip $653.33/trip

2 Table F is included in Appendix I
786
[AUTHOR NAME] 1
7 C. The Traffic Facilities Fee Fund had the following activity in FY25:

The City spent $169,637 spent on the “ST1905 Street Improvement Sun Lakes Blvd” project in fiscal year 2024-25. One hundred percent of this project was funded with fees
E. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, as identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 66001, and the public improvement remains incomplete:

The Traffic Facilities fee is based on the “Planned-Based” 3 approach to determine
impacts from new development. Under this approach, the City identified $108.4 million in facilities to be funded by new development. Over the last five years the City has collected $2.17 million in impact fees. The City plans to use funding for both the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension and Hargrave Grade Separation.

No interfund transfers or loans were made utilizing these funds during fiscal year 2023-24.

3 The “Update of Traffic Fee Component of the Development Fee Program” was performed by LSA Associates in their 2019 study.

Fund 420 - Traffic Facilities FY24-25
Beginning Balance 2,137,290
Fees Collected 201,131
lnterest Earned 5,407
Other
Expenditures (169,637)
Estimated Ending Fund Balance 2,174,191
5 Year Finding (193,187)
787
[AUTHOR NAME] 1
8 G. The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001:

No refunds were made during fiscal year 2024-25.

Five-Year Finding
The City has no accumulation of unexpended funds from five years ago in the Traffic Facilities Fee Fund.

H. Identify the purpose to which the fee will be put:

The purpose of the Traffic Fee is to fund fair-share costs associated with improvements identified in the documents listed in Section 1 at build-out of the City’s General Plan and to allocate those costs to development within the City. The Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) has prepared a Nexus Study and developed a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) to provide funding for improvements to freeway interchanges, railroad grade separations, and regional arterial highways on the Nexus Study Network. The City of Banning has adopted and is required to implement a compliant development mitigation program for the Nexus Study Network. Additionally, the City of Banning DIF (Signalization) has a traffic signal fee component which includes costs for new signals at several intersections Citywide. This analysis combines the existing Traffic Fee (signalization) with the current analysis to create a combined Traffic Fee program. The Traffic Fee update will be assessed to defray costs of transportation improvements at intersections that are not included in the TUMF but would require improvements due to background growth and new development within the City. This fee does not include frontage improvements and/or street segments within the City, which will be the responsibility of individual development projects. The fees will be applicable to all development within the City.

I. Demonstrate the reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged:

As new development occurs, there will be an increase in demand for transportation facilities. The fees will be used to construct transportation improvements resulting in better traffic operations, to meet transportation demand from new development. The fee calculations are based on the improvements listed in the LSA Associates 2019 report that are not part of the TUMF. Improvements that are part of the TUMF are not included because development projects are required to pay the TUMF. Inclusion of those intersections already included in the TUMF would result in charging the projects twice for the same improvements.
788
[AUTHOR NAME] 1
9 J. Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of incomplete improvements for which impact fees are to be used:

The Traffic Fees are set to supplement the TUMF. Developers may also need to supplement a project’s cost if necessary for the development to proceed.

Water Capital Facilities Development Fee
Annual Findings
A. The Water Capital Facility Fees are a one-time charge collected from new developments or existing developments requesting new services from the City’s Water Distribution System. The fees collected can be utilized for the Water Department Capital Improvement Program.

B. Water fees are based on meter size. The current fees are:

Meter Size Current Fee
¾” Meter $5,847
1” Meter $9,744
1 ½” Meter $19,488
2” Meter $31,181
3” Meter $58,464
4” Meter $97,441
C. The Water Capital Facilities Fee Fund had the following activity in FY25:

Fund 661 - Water Facilities FY24-25
Beginning Balance 3,306,911
Fees Collected 415,122
lnterest Earned 8,278
Other
Expenditures (277,728)
Estimated Ending Fund Balance 3,452,583
5 Year Finding 1,084,196
789
[AUTHOR NAME] 2
0 D. An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees:

The City spent $277,728 on the “Well C8 Planning and Design” project in fiscal year 2024-25. One hundred percent of this project was funded with fees.

The Water Facilities fee is based on the “System Planning” 4 approach to determine
impacts from new development. Under this approach, the City identified $165.83 million in facilities to be funded by new development. Over the last five years the City has collected over $2.3 million in impact fees. The City plans to construct a new water pumping station identified in the CIP to ensure the reliable flow of water throughout the community. The project is estimated at $5 to $7 million. Planning will begin in 2026-27.

No interfund transfers or loans were made utilizing these funds during fiscal year 2023-24.

G. The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001:

No refunds were made during fiscal year 2024-25.

Five-Year Finding
The City has $1,084,196 in unexpended funds from five years ago from the Water Fees.

H. Identify the purpose to which the fee will be put:

4 The Wastewater projects listed for the Water Capital Facilities Fee is provided in Table 7.3 of the 2019 Wildan study.
790
[AUTHOR NAME] 2
1 The City plans to use this fee revenue to pay for the debt service on the existing police headquarters. The City can also use police facilities fee revenues for the construction or purchase of buildings, equipment and land that are part of the system of police facilities serving new development.

I. Demonstrate the reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged:

Estimates of new development and its consequent increased water demand provide the basis for calculating the water facilities fee. The need for water facilities improvements is based on the water demand placed on the system by development. A reasonable measure of demand is a flow generation rate, expressed as the number of gallons per day generated by a specific type of land use. Flow generation rates are a reasonable measure of demand on the City’s system of water improvements because they represent the average rate of demand that will be placed on the system per land use designation.

J. Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of incomplete improvements for which impact fees are to be used:

The Water facilities plan allocates cost to both existing and new development. The existing development costs are estimated to be $29.3 million. 5 Sources for this funding
could come from a variety of sources including rates, bonds, or grants.

K. Designate the approximate dates on which the funding necessary to complete financing of those improvements will be deposited into the appropriate account or fund:

The date of impact fee collection and deposit of funding is difficult to predict and will depend on the timing of each specific developer and on the relative economic conditions. As such, the City is unable to predict when allsuch development impact fees will be accumulated and will continue to provide updates as additional information and fees are collected. As part of the budget process, the City identifies public improvement projects that have sufficient impact fee funds available and the approximate dates (fiscal year) of construction. This information is included in the Capital Improvement Program which is adopted by City Council as part of the overall budget adoption process.

5 Data is provided on Table 8.3: Water Facilities Cost to Serve New Development in the Wildan 2019 study. 791
[AUTHOR NAME] 2
2 Wastewater Capital Facilities Development Fee
Annual Findings
A. The Wastewater Capital Facility Fee is a one-time charge collected from new development or existing development requesting new services from the City’s wastewater collection system. The fees collected can be utilized for Wastewater Division Capital Improvement Programs.

B. The current fees are:

Fee Basis Current Fee
Waste Water EDU $5,061/EDU
C. The Wastewater Capital Facilities Fee Fund had the following activity in FY25:

The City spent a total of $204,094 from these fees in 2024-25. The expenses included CEQA and NEPA analysis as well as initial design costs related to the planned expansion of the wastewater treatment plant. In addition, these fees were used for equalization basins for the wastewater treatment plant.

Fund 681 - WWater Facilities FY24-25
Beginning Balance 11,001,045
Fees Collected 151,830
lnterest Earned 27,804
Other
Expenditures (204,094)
Estimated Ending Fund Balance 10,976,585
5 Year Finding 10,330,579
792
[AUTHOR NAME] 2
3 The Wastewater Facilities fee is based on the “System Planning”6 approach to determine impacts from new development. Under this approach, the City identified $73.71 million in facilities to be funded by new development. Over the last five years the City has collected over $646,000 in impact fees. The City has accumulated enough funds to begin the initial work on an expansion to the Wastewater Treatment Plant in FY27. The total project is estimated to be $95 million; however, all project funding has not been identified at this time.

No interfund transfers or loans were made utilizing these funds during fiscal year 2023-24.

G. The amount of refunds made pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 66001 and any allocation pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001:

No refunds were made during fiscal year 2024-25.

Five-Year Finding
The City has $10,330,579 in unexpended funds from five years ago from the Police Fees.

H. Identify the purpose to which the fee will be put:

As noted above, the City is planning a Wastewater Treatment Plant expansion.

Projected costs are estimated to be $95 million.

I. Demonstrate the reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged:

6 The Wastewater projects listed for the Facilities Fee is provided in Table 7.3 of the 2019 Wildan study. 7 Table 7.3 of the Wildan study
793
[AUTHOR NAME] 2
4 of the Government Code requires that a reasonable relationship exists between the need for public facilities and the type of development on which a fee is imposed. The need for public facilities is related to the level of service demanded, which varies in proportion to the equivalent dwelling units (“EDUs”) generated by a particular land use type.

J. Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of incomplete improvements for which impact fees are to be used:

The Wastewater facilities plan allocates cost to both existing and new development.

The existing development costs are estimated to be $19.9 million. 8 Sources for this
funding could come from a variety of sources including rates, bonds, or grants.

K. Designate the approximate dates on which the funding necessary to complete financing of those improvements will be deposited into the appropriate account or fund:

The date of impact fee collection and deposit of funding is difficult to predict and will depend on the timing of each specific developer and on the relative economic conditions. As such, the City is unable to predict when allsuch development impact fees will be accumulated and will continue to provide updates as additional information and fees are collected. As part of the budget process, the City identifies public improvement projects that have sufficient impact fee funds available and the approximate dates (fiscal year) of construction. This information is included in the Capital Improvement Program which is adopted by City Council as part of the overall budget adoption process.

8 Data is provided on Table 7.3: Water Facilities Cost to Serve New Development in the Wildan 2019 study. 794
[AUTHOR NAME] 2
5 Appendix I
795
[AUTHOR NAME] 2
6 796

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Arturo Vela, Interim City Manager
PREPARED BY: Mary Yaryan, Associate Planner
David A. Newell, Community Development Director
MEETING DATE: December 9, 2025
SUBJECT:

Consider Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance No. 1614 Repealing and Replacing Chapter 12.32 (House Numbering System), and Adoption of Resolution No. 2025-165 Approving the Citywide Addressing Policy.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. Waive full reading, direct the City Clerk to read the ordinance by title only, and introduce Ordinance No. 1614

2. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-165 approving the City of Banning Addressing Policy BACKGROUND:

Chapter 12.32 of the Banning Municipal Code was adopted several years ago and reflects an outdated manual, map-based addressing approach centered on Ramsey Street and San Gorgonio Avenue. This system predates modern GIS technology, current emergency service standards, digital permitting processes, and the City’s utility billing systems. An update to the Municipal Code is necessary to clearly define the City’s addressing administration, posting requirements, and assignment standards.

Staff prepared an updated Chapter 12.32 to modernize the City’s addressing and house numbering system. The proposed ordinance replaces the outdated language and establishes current requirements related to administrative authority, address posting, assignment rules, visibility standards, and maintenance of the City’s Master Address Database.

Separately, the Community Development Department has prepared a Citywide Addressing Policy. The Policy is an administrative document that provides the technical standards and detailed procedures used by staff during address assignment and verification. These include numbering increments, multi-unit addressing, accessory addressing, visibility standards, and street naming conventions. The Policy is not part of the Municipal Code and is adopted independently through the attached resolution.

Although both actions relate to addressing, each stands alone and is independently considered under 797
this single public hearing.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

Both actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) (“common sense exemption”) because they can be seen with certainty to have no potential to cause a significant environmental impact.

JUSTIFICATION:

Updating the City’s addressing framework enhances public safety, operational efficiency, and consistency across internal departments and external agencies. Adoption of the ordinance and the policy will:

Establish a clear, modernized, and uniform addressing framework Improve dispatch accuracy and emergency response
Support GIS, permitting, and utility billing systems
Ensure consistent address posting and visibility for first responders Clarify administrative responsibility for address assignment and corrections Provide the City Council authority to adopt address-related fees Create standardized practices for multi-unit, accessory, and complex development addressing The Addressing Policy provides the necessary administrative detail for staff and ensures consistent implementation across all departments and development types.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no direct fiscal impact associated with these actions.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Approve both actions as recommended.

2. Approve only the ordinance or only the resolution.

3. Provide direction to staff for modifications.

4. Decline both actions and retain the existing addressing process and policy.

BUDGETED?:

No
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT:

No
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution_2025-165_Addressing_Policy.docx

2. Ordinance 1614_12.32__Final.docx

3. Exhibit A Repealing BMC 12.32 .pdf

4. Exhibit B New BMC 12.32.pdf

5. Exhibit C Addressing Policy F4.pdf

6. Addressing Policy 2020 F3.pdf
798

7. Ordinance 1614_Affidavit of Publication.pdf
799
Resolution 2025-165

Page 1 of 4 ends

RESOLUTION 2025-165

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA,

ADOPTING THE CITY OF BANNING ADDRESSING POLICY TO ESTABLISH A

STANDARDIZED AND UNIFORM ADDRESSING SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the City of Banning requires consistent addressing practices to support emergency response, accurate service delivery, GIS mapping, utility coordination, and interdepartmental communication; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has prepared a Citywide Addressing Policy to establish standardized procedures for address assignment, verification, posting, street naming, and maintenance of address records; and WHEREAS, the Addressing Policy incorporates recognized best practices, including national postal addressing standards and applicable fire guidelines; and WHEREAS, adoption of a Citywide Addressing Policy will ensure uniform application of addressing procedures, improve public safety, and maintain consistency across all City departments, outside agencies, and emergency responders; and WHEREAS, the existing Administrative Policy titled “Addressing Policy,” Policy No. F-3, is no longer consistent with current operational practices and will be superseded and replaced in its entirety by the new Addressing Policy, Policy No. F-4; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to formally adopt the Addressing Policy to guide the administrative implementation of the City’s addressing system.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. ADOPTION OF POLICY
The City Council hereby adopts the City of Banning Addressing Policy, attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. ADMINISTRATION
The Community Development Director, or designee, is authorized to administer the Addressing Policy, maintain the Master Address Database, and make administrative updates necessary to ensure consistency with applicable federal, state, and local addressing and emergency access standards.
800
Resolution 2025-165

Page 2 of 4 ends

SECTION 3. CERTIFICATION
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9
th day of December, 2025.

ATTEST:

Sandra Calderon, Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

John Pinkney, City Attorney
Slovak, Baron, Empey, Murphy &
Pinkney, LLP
, Mayor
City of Banning
801
Resolution 2025-165

Page 3 of 4 ends

CERTIFICATION:

I, Sandra Calderon, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2025-165, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 9th day of December, 2025 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Sandra Calderon, Depty City Clerk
City of Banning, California
802
Resolution 2025-165

Page 4 of 4 ends

EXHIBIT C
Addressing Policy
803
ORDINANCE NO. 1614

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING THE EXISTING CHAPTER 12.32 AND ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER 12.32 (HOUSE NUMBERING SYSTEM) OF TITLE 12 (STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND PUBLIC

PLACES) OF THE BANNING MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE

ADDRESSING AND HOUSE NUMBERING SYSTEM
WHEREAS, Chapter 12.32 of the Banning Municipal Code was adopted in 1965 and refers to a manual map-based system that is incompatible with the City’s current digital GIS, permitting, utility billing, and emergency dispatch systems.

WHEREAS, a uniform, modern addressing system is necessary to promote the public health, safety, and welfare by enhancing public safety, efficient emergency response, accurate mail and parcel delivery, and interagency coordination.

WHEREAS, the adoption of a new addressing and housing numbering system will provide clarity, sequencing, and support integration with the City’s digital Master Address Database.

WHEREAS, in accordance with the City’s Police Powers, the City of Banning hereby repeals Chapter 12.32 House Numbering System of the Banning Municipal Code and adopts a new Chapter 12.32 House Numbering System of the Banning Municipal Code.

NOW THERFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF BANNING, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL
The City Council finds that this Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), the “common sense” exemption, as it can be seen with certainty that the adoption of this Ordinance will not have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. This action involves the modernization and administrative update of existing addressing procedures and will not result in any physical environmental impacts.

SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY.

If any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision 804
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. The City Council declares it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any portion.

SECTION 3. PROSECUTION OF PRIOR ORDINANCE.

Neither the adoption of this Ordinance nor the repeal of any prior ordinance shall affect the prosecution of any violation of the Banning Municipal Code committed before this Ordinance’s effective date.

SECTION 4. FINDINGS.

The City Council of the City of Banning finds as follows:

A uniform, modern addressing system is necessary to promote public safety, efficient emergency response, accurate mail and parcel delivery, and interagency coordination.

Chapter 12.32 of the Banning Municipal Code, adopted in 1965, refers to a manual map-based system that is not compatible with the City’s current digital GIS, permitting, utility billing, and emergency dispatch systems.

The repealing of the existing and adopting of a new Chapter 12.32 will enhance clarity, sequencing, and consistency of addresses citywide and support integration with the City’s digital Master Address Database and promote the public health, safety, and welfare.

SECTION 5. APPROVAL.

The City Council hereby approves amendments to the Banning Municipal Code by repealing existing Chapter 12.32, in its entirety, as set forth in Exhibit A, and adopting a new Chapter 12.32 titled “House Numbering System”, as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE AND PUBLICATION.

The Mayor shall sign, and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and cause the same, or a summary thereof, to be published within fifteen (15) days after adoption in accordance with Government Code Section 36933. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after adoption in accordance with Government Code Section 36937.
805
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED that the City Council of the City of Banning, California, approves an amendment to the City of Banning Municipal Code.

INTRODUCED AND READ for the first time and ordered posted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Banning, California, held on the 9th day of December 2025, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Banning, California, held on the day of (second reading date), 2025.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
, Mayor
City of Banning
Attest:

Sandra Calderon, Deputy City Clerk City of Banning
Approved as to form:

John Pinkney, City Attorney
Slovak, Baron, Empey, Murphy & Pinkney, LLP
806
Exhibit A
Title 12 - STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND PUBLIC PLACES
Chapter 12.32 HOUSE NUMBERING SYSTEM

Page 1 of 1 ends

Chapter 12.32 HOUSE NUMBERING SYSTEM

12.32.010 House numbering—System adopted.

The uniform system of house numbers described in the Section 12.32.020 is hereby adopted and established in the city.
(Code 1965, § 21-17.)

12.32.020 House numbering—System described.

The house numbering system for the city shall be as follows:

Starting with Ramsey Street and San Gorgonio Avenue as zero lines and numbering north and south and east and west from these streets, allowing one hundred numbers for each three hundred and thirty foot block, plus or minus, with the numbers divided centesimally along the block, and the blocks numbered as set forth and contained in the certain map entitled "Index of Block Numbers of the City of Banning, California," on file at the City Hall, which map is by reference made a part of this chapter. (Code 1965, § 21-18.)

12.32.030 Duty of owners or occupants of premises—Generally.

Every person owning, controlling, occupying or using any house, store, storeroom or building situated on premises fronting on any street, avenue or other public way or place in the city shall procure, place, attach and maintain in a conspicuous place on the street front of every such house, store, storeroom or building and on, over or near each door or entry thereto facing on any street, avenue or other public way or place the number assigned thereto by the city.
(Code 1965, § 21-19.)

12.32.040 Duty of owners or occupants of premises—In case of new or altered structures.

It shall be the duty of every person owning, controlling, occupying or using any new or altered structure required to be numbered by this chapter to place, attach and maintain the appropriate number to such structure within sixty days after either the completion or occupancy of the structure, whichever comes first. (Code 1965, § 21-20.)

12.32.050 Size, type, etc., of numbers.

All house numbers shall be of such size and type and so placed as to be easily visible and legible from the center of the street, avenue or other public way or place upon which the premises fronts and shall not be less than three and one-half-inches in height; provided, that numbers embossed, stamped or painted on a plate contrasting in color may be not less than two and one-half inches in height. (Code 1965, § 21-21.)
807
Exhibit B
Title 12 - STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND PUBLIC PLACES
Chapter 12.32 HOUSE NUMBERING SYSTEM

Page 1 of 2 ends

Chapter 12.32 HOUSE NUMBERING SYSTEM

12.32.010 Adoption of Uniform Addressing System.

A uniform addressing and house numbering system is hereby adopted and established within the City of Banning.

The purpose of this system is to promote public safety, efficient emergency response, accurate mail and parcel delivery, and coordination among public agencies and utilities.

12.32.020 General Addressing Method
Addresses within the City shall be assigned in a logical, consistent, and sequential manner in accordance with a standardized grid and numbering system maintained by the City.

The baseline for numbering shall generally correspond with major intersecting streets within the City, with address numbers increasing outward from that point.

The specific methods and standards for address assignment, numbering increments, and street naming shall be maintained administratively in the City’s adopted Addressing Policy on file with the Community Development Department.

12.32.030 Responsibility of Property Owners and Occupants.

Every person owning, controlling, occupying, or using any house, building, or structure fronting on any street or public way shall post and maintain the official address number assigned by the City Address numbers shall be displayed in a location that is visible from the adjacent public right-of-way or access drive and shall be kept in good repair at all times No person shall display, alter, or remove any address number except as authorized by the City.

12.32.040 New or Altered Structures.

It shall be the duty of every person owning, controlling, occupying, or using any new or altered structure required to be numbered by this Chapter to post and maintain the assigned number prior to final inspection, occupancy, or utility activation, whichever occurs first The City may withhold issuance of final approvals or services until the structure is properly addressed and posted.

12.32.050 Address Number Specifications.

All address numbers shall be of sufficient size, color contrast, and placement to be clearly visible and legible from the public right-of-way or private access serving the property, consistent with the Fire Code and the City’s adopted Addressing Policy.

A. Buildings not visible from the street shall provide address identification at the point of access.

B. Illumination may be required where necessary for visibility and emergency response.

12.32.060 Administration and Enforcement.

The Community Development Director, or designee, shall administer this Chapter and maintain the City’s official Master Address Database.

The Director may adopt and update administrative procedures, standards, and guidelines consistent with this Chapter.
808

Page 2 of 2 ends

Violations of this Chapter or the Addressing Policy are subject to enforcement under Title 1 of this Code and any applicable Fire Code provisions.

12.32.070 Fees.

Fees for address-related services shall be established by resolution of the City Council and listed in the City’s Master Fee Schedule.

Such services may include, but are not limited to, new address assignment, address verification, change or correction of address, temporary addresses, tenant or suite numbering, and street naming or renaming.

Fees shall be due at the time of application submittal and are non-refundable unless otherwise specified by the City Council.

The Community Development Director may waive or defer fees for City-initiated address corrections necessary for public safety or administrative consistency. 809
City of Banning
Administrative Procedures
Addressing Policy
POLICY NO:

F-4

ORIGINATING
DEPARTMENT:

Community
Development
DIVISION:

Planning
ADOPTION DATE:
12/09/2025
APPROVED BY:

City Council
LAST AMENDED:

SUPERSEDES:

F-3
REFERENCE:

N/A
PAGE 1 of 18
SECTION 1: PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY
The primary purpose of this policy is to provide a standardized and uniform method of assigning addresses to buildings, structures, and utilities within the City of Banning for clarity, safety, and efficient emergency response. This policy supports the requirements outlined in Banning Municipal Code Chapter 12.32 and aligns with the addressing standards of current Fire guidelines and United States Postal Service. The intent is to ensure consistency across all assigned addresses within the City's data systems.

The Community Development Director (Director), or their designee, has sole authority to assign, modify, verify, or revoke addresses. Unauthorized changes are prohibited and may result in disruption of services or enforcement actions. The Director may establish administrative rules to implement this policy. The Director or designee is the sole custodian of the City’s Master Address Database and no new address, change, or retirement (including GIS, permitting, billing, or utility systems) shall occur without written authorization from the Director or designee. Upon assignment or change, addresses shall be synchronized across the City’s Master Address Database, GIS, permitting, Utility Billing, Banning Electric Utility, and emergency systems.

SECTION 2: BACKGROUND
Accurate, consistent, and logically sequenced addressing is critical for public safety, emergency response, postal delivery, utility coordination, and integrity of City records. The City of Banning has historically relied on a grid-based addressing system adopted through Banning Municipal Code (BMC) Chapter 12.32 and the “Index of Block Numbers of the City of Banning.” Over time, variations in development patterns, legacy addressing practices, and the introduction of new residential and mixed-use housing types have created inconsistencies within City and regional data systems.

Modern emergency response, automated dispatch, GIS integration, and utility coordination require precise, standardized address data. Inconsistent or inaccurate addressing can delay emergency response, interfere with postal delivery, disrupt utility activation, and create discrepancies across permitting, billing, and parcel databases.

This Addressing Policy establishes clear administrative procedures and uniform standards to:
• Implement the updated BMC Chapter 12.32 House Numbering System; • Ensure consistency between the City’s Master Address Database, GIS, Utility Billing, emergency response systems, and regional datasets;
810
City of Banning
Administrative Procedures
Addressing Policy
POLICY NO:

F-4

ORIGINATING
DEPARTMENT:

Community
Development
DIVISION:

Planning
ADOPTION DATE:
12/09/2025
APPROVED BY:

City Council
LAST AMENDED:

SUPERSEDES:

F-3
REFERENCE:

N/A
PAGE 2 of 18
• Guide staff, developers, and property owners through proper assignment, posting, and verification of addresses; and
• Support orderly growth, new development types (e.g., ADUs, mixed-use, multi-story), and long-term maintenance of address integrity.

This policy is intended to modernize and operationalize the City’s addressing program, reduce longterm inconsistencies, and create a predictable and transparent process that supports life-safety, regulatory compliance, and efficient municipal operations.

SECTION 3: DEFINITIONS
The following terms shall have the assigned definitions for all purposes under this policy:
• Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU): A legally permitted secondary dwelling unit, attached or detached from the primary residence, with its own kitchen, sleeping, and sanitation facilities.

Addressing for ADUs shall be determined by the Director or designee in compliance with applicable State and local regulations.
• Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit (JADU): A dwelling unit that is 500 square feet or less in size, created within the walls of an existing or proposed single-family residence. Addressing for JADUs shall be determined by the designee in compliance with applicable State and local regulations.
• Address Monument: A permanent freestanding sign structure that displays a property’s official address when the building itself is not visible from the public right-of-way. • Address Verification: A formal process performed by the City to confirm that an existing or proposed address is officially recognized in the City’s Master Address Database, County parcel records, and USPS system. Often required by lenders, title companies, and utility providers. • Fractional Address: A numeric suffix (e.g., ½, ¼, ⅓, ¾) assigned to utility infrastructure, meters, or ancillary features. Fractional addresses are non-deliverable and are for internal City/agency use only.
• Main Address: The base whole number address assigned to a legal parcel or primary structure.

This number is used for all official City records, postal delivery, and emergency response. • Phased Development: A subdivision or master-planned community approved in multiple stages.
• Site Map Display Board: A directory sign showing the layout of units, suites, or buildings in a multi-unit development, typically located at primary vehicle/pedestrian entrances. 811
City of Banning
Administrative Procedures
Addressing Policy
POLICY NO:

F-4

ORIGINATING
DEPARTMENT:

Community
Development
DIVISION:

Planning
ADOPTION DATE:
12/09/2025
APPROVED BY:

City Council
LAST AMENDED:

SUPERSEDES:

F-3
REFERENCE:

N/A
PAGE 3 of 18
• Sub-address: Any designation added to a main address to identify internal occupancy, including apartment numbers, suites, tenant spaces, or units.
• Suite Numbering Convention: The standardized numbering method for commercial or multistory buildings where the first digit represents the floor level (e.g., 101 for first floor, 201 for second floor).
• TEMP Address: A temporary numeric designation assigned solely for utility infrastructure, such as construction power poles or temporary electrical service points. TEMP addresses are nondeliverable, non-occupancy addresses and shall be retired upon final power release or project completion.
• Unit Number: The official identifier assigned to individual dwelling units or tenant spaces within a larger structure or parcel.

SECTION 4: ADDRESSING STANDARDS

4.1 Addressing Methodology
The City of Banning uses a block grid addressing system originating from the intersection of Ramsey Street (east–west axis) and San Gorgonio Avenue (north–south axis), which serves as the City’s baseline. Addresses are assigned outward from this intersection at an approximate rate of 100 numbers per 330-foot block, as implemented through the City’s standardized grid and numbering system maintained pursuant to BMC Section 12.32.020 and the ‘Index of Block Numbers of the City of Banning’ on file at City Hall. Address assignments shall be consistent with the “Index of Block Numbers of the City of Banning, California,” which is incorporated by reference into BMC Chapter

12.32. • Even numbers are assigned to the south and east sides of streets. • Odd numbers are assigned to the north and west sides of streets.

Corner and Through Lots: Corner lots shall be addressed according to the primary pedestrian entry or primary driveway access, as determined by the Director or designee, for emergency response efficiency. Through lots (with two parallel street frontages) shall be addressed based on actual access and service routing. Any subsequent change in primary access may require an address change. This system ensures uniformity, prevents duplication, and maintains navigability for emergency response, postal delivery, and utility coordination. For structures with internal or stacked occupancies (apartments, condominiums, office suites), a base address shall be assigned to the primary structure, with logical unit or suite identifiers added according to floor level and entry sequence. 812
City of Banning
Administrative Procedures
Addressing Policy
POLICY NO:

F-4

ORIGINATING
DEPARTMENT:

Community
Development
DIVISION:

Planning
ADOPTION DATE:
12/09/2025
APPROVED BY:

City Council
LAST AMENDED:

SUPERSEDES:

F-3
REFERENCE:

N/A
PAGE 4 of 18
Multiple Buildings on One Parcel and Ancillary Facilities: Parcels with multiple principal buildings shall have one main address. Additional buildings shall receive building designators (e.g., Building A/B or Building 1/2) and/or sub-addresses as directed by the City. Common-area facilities (e.g., laundry rooms, recreation buildings) shall be identified on the Site Map Display Board and may receive internal identifiers for emergency access.

Minimum Address Intervals: Primary addresses shall be assigned using increments of at least twelve (12) whole numbers between adjacent properties along a standard residential block face (e.g., 1000, 1012, 1026). This spacing preserves logical sequencing, accommodates future infill or additional dwelling units, and ensures uniformity with the City’s grid system. For shorter blocks, culde-sacs, or irregular lot configurations, the interval may be adjusted proportionally by the Director or designee to maintain address continuity and reserve capacity for future development or multiple units on a parcel.

All address assignments must conform to the grid, maintain continuity with surrounding properties, and satisfy emergency response and visibility standards.

4.2 Address Assignment Triggers
Addresses shall be assigned:
• Upon issuance of a building permit
• Upon recordation of a final tract or parcel map
• When new utility services are installed
• When legal structures are modified, converted, or split into additional permitted units • For final address issuance, an Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) or proof of recorded final map must be provided
• Final addresses require proof of recorded tract/parcel map or County-issued APN(s) aligned to the recorded map.
• Temporary addresses are not valid for postal delivery, utility activation, or occupancy.

Addresses shall not be issued for:
• Unpermitted structures
• Temporary or unauthorized occupancy
• Vacant Parcels

4.3 Display Requirements
813
City of Banning
Administrative Procedures
Addressing Policy
POLICY NO:

F-4

ORIGINATING
DEPARTMENT:

Community
Development
DIVISION:

Planning
ADOPTION DATE:
12/09/2025
APPROVED BY:

City Council
LAST AMENDED:

SUPERSEDES:

F-3
REFERENCE:

N/A
PAGE 5 of 18
Address numbers shall be Arabic numerals or alphabet letters, plainly legible, and visible from the public street or road fronting the property. Address numbers shall be permanently affixed and durable. Painted numbers, spray paint, temporary stickers, chalk, or taped paper are prohibited.

Numbers must contrast with their background and be free from visual obstructions such as landscaping, signs, or equipment. Address visibility standards include:

Building Type Minimum
Height
Stroke
Width
Illumination
Required
One & Two Family Residential 4 inches 0.5 inch Yes (if
new/remodeled)
Commercial/Multi-Family ≤ 25 ft
building height 12 inches 0.5 inch Yes
Commercial/Multi-Family > 25 ft
building height 24 inches 0.5 inch Yes
All new or remodeled buildings must have internally or externally illuminated address numbers. If the structure is not visible from the street, an address monument must be installed at the property entrance. For shared driveways, provide directional signage with arrows and posted addresses. All suites shall have a minimum 6-inch high number on both the front and rear doors. Numbers shall contrast with their background and remain unobstructed by landscaping, banners, window coverings, or equipment.

4.4 Duty of Property Owner
The owner or occupant of any new or altered structure shall post and maintain the assigned address prior to final inspection, occupancy, or utility activation, whichever occurs first, and shall keep the address visible and legible at all times. Failure to maintain visible address numbers is subject to enforcement under BMC Chapter 12.32 and the Fire Code.

4.5 Electric Service Re-Energization
Electric Service Re-Energization (De-energized > 6 Months).

Prior to electric release, the City requires: (1) address verification and use review by Community Development; (2) a site investigation by the Building Official, Banning Electric Utility, Public Works (as applicable), and the Fire Marshal; (3) payment of applicable fees; (4) proof of tenancy if the request is by a tenant; and (5) correction of any use or life-safety violations.

All required corrections must be verified prior to electric release. 814
City of Banning
Administrative Procedures
Addressing Policy
POLICY NO:

F-4

ORIGINATING
DEPARTMENT:

Community
Development
DIVISION:

Planning
ADOPTION DATE:
12/09/2025
APPROVED BY:

City Council
LAST AMENDED:

SUPERSEDES:

F-3
REFERENCE:

N/A
PAGE 6 of 18
SECTION 5: ADDRESSING ASSIGNMENT PROCESS

5.1 Address Changes, Verifications & Request Submittals Applicants seeking to change or verify an address must submit an addressing application on a form provided by the Community Development Department, along with any required supporting materials. Supporting materials may include a site plan, utility layout, justification letter, or other relevant documentation.

Address changes will only be approved when:
• There is a sequencing error or duplication
• A primary building entrance has moved
• Public safety or service delivery would be improved
Verification requests confirm the official status of an existing address and may be required by utility companies or lenders. The Director or designee will evaluate all requests and issue formal confirmation or denial. Occupants affected by any address changes will be provided notice and may request additional time or administrative review, in accordance with procedures established by the Director or designee.

Review Scope and Processing : Address change and verification requests will be reviewed against:
(1) the City’s Master Address Database, (2) City GIS, (3) applicable County Assessor/APN records, (4) USPS addressing standards (including Publication 28), (5) 911/computer-aided dispatch and other emergency response layers, and (6) Utility Billing and Banning Electric Utility service records.

Standard processing time is five to seven (5–7) business days after the City receives a complete submittal. Life-safety or emergency-response conflicts may be expedited at the Director’s discretion.

Outcomes and Notification: Upon completion of the review, the City will issue one of the following:
• Approved – an Address Assignment or Verification Letter and, where applicable, a stamped address site plan; or
815
City of Banning
Administrative Procedures
Addressing Policy
POLICY NO:

F-4

ORIGINATING
DEPARTMENT:

Community
Development
DIVISION:

Planning
ADOPTION DATE:
12/09/2025
APPROVED BY:

City Council
LAST AMENDED:

SUPERSEDES:

F-3
REFERENCE:

N/A
PAGE 7 of 18
• Conditionally approved – subject to specified corrections such as posting, suite numbering, or map notations; or
• Denied – with a written deficiency list identifying conflicts (e.g., duplication, sequencing, visibility, or unpermitted structure issues).

Upon address approval, the City will issue an official Address Assignment Letter and address site plan to the applicant. This documentation must be retained for permitting, utility setup, and agency notifications. The Address Assignment Letter and site plan shall be considered the controlling record for permitting, utility setup, and agency notification.

Corrections may be approved for: (1) wrong odd/even side, (2) non-contiguous or non-sequential numbering, (3) duplication within 1,000 ft or the same blockface, (4) conflicts with emergency services or USPS, (5) change in primary access/frontage, or (6) routing/dispatch ambiguity documented by Fire/Police.

The City may initiate address corrections when systemic errors are identified (e.g., wrong parity, skipped ranges, non-sequential runs, or emergency service/mail conflicts). The Director may issue a Notice of Proposed Correction, provide an opportunity for affected occupants to comment, and then issue a Final Correction Order with an effective date and any applicable appeal information.

Affected occupants may request reconsideration or appeal of a correction on the grounds of mapping error or demonstrated service conflict, subject to procedures and timelines established by the Director or designee. The Director may grant additional time for implementation where lifesafety is not impacted.

5.2 Temporary vs. Final Addresses
A temporary address may be issued for planning or entitlement purposes and is subject to change.

Final addresses are officially issued upon final map recordation or building permit issuance. Only final addresses may be used for utility setup, mail delivery, and occupancy. Final addresses require either a recorded tract/parcel map or documentation of assigned Assessor Parcel Numbers (APN) to ensure address alignment with official County records.

Temporary addresses shall be clearly marked as TEMP in all City systems. 816
City of Banning
Administrative Procedures
Addressing Policy
POLICY NO:

F-4

ORIGINATING
DEPARTMENT:

Community
Development
DIVISION:

Planning
ADOPTION DATE:
12/09/2025
APPROVED BY:

City Council
LAST AMENDED:

SUPERSEDES:

F-3
REFERENCE:

N/A
PAGE 8 of 18

5.2.1 Construction Site Addressing
The purpose is to ensure all active construction sites are identifiable for emergency response, inspections, and deliveries. The City shall assign a provisional construction address to any permitted project prior to or concurrent with building permit issuance. This ensures that Fire, Police, and utility responders can locate the site before permanent structures or monuments are in place.

Assignment:
• The construction site shall use the final approved address whenever possible (e.g., the permanent street number assigned to the parcel or building). • If a permanent address has not yet been issued (e.g., prior to tract recordation), the City may issue a provisional construction address that aligns with the approved site plan and anticipated permanent numbering sequence.
• The provisional address shall be updated to the final address once the map is recorded or the building permit reaches the final inspection stage.

Display Requirements:
• The address (permanent or provisional) must be posted at the main site entrance using weather-resistant, reflective numbers at least 6 inches high, visible from the public rightof-way. • For large or multi-phase construction sites, additional address signs shall be posted at each major access point and on construction trailers or temporary offices. • Signage shall remain visible throughout construction and not be obstructed by fencing, materials, or equipment.
• For gated projects, the address shall be placed outside the gate for emergency responders.

Coordination:
• The construction address shall be confirmed with the Fire Marshal and Banning Police Department prior to the first inspection.
• The address shall appear on the building permit, inspection records, and emergency dispatch layers in GIS.
• Upon final inspection or issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, the provisional construction address shall automatically transition to the final permanent address in all City systems.

Prohibited Uses:
817
City of Banning
Administrative Procedures
Addressing Policy
POLICY NO:

F-4

ORIGINATING
DEPARTMENT:

Community
Development
DIVISION:

Planning
ADOPTION DATE:
12/09/2025
APPROVED BY:

City Council
LAST AMENDED:

SUPERSEDES:

F-3
REFERENCE:

N/A
PAGE 9 of 18
• Construction addresses are not postal addresses and may not be used for mail delivery or legal occupancy. They are for safety, inspection, and operational use only.

5.3 Addressing for New Residential Developments
New commercial, industrial, or institutional structures shall be assigned a unique whole number address. Where multiple entrances, tenants, or utility meters exist, additional unit or sub-addresses will be assigned as needed. Building permit issuance shall be contingent upon address assignment and compliance with Fire Department visibility and signage standards.

5.4 Addressing for New Non-Residential Buildings
Address verification requests may be submitted by property owners, tenants, developers, or utility companies to confirm the accuracy and official recognition of an existing address. Requests must be submitted in writing on a form provided by the Department. The City shall verify the address against the City’s official GIS, parcel records, and USPS standards. A fee may apply.

5.5 Tenant Numbering Standards (Suites/Unit)
Tenant space addressing ensures that multi-tenant buildings and complexes are logically sequenced, clearly posted, and easily identifiable for emergency response, postal delivery, utilities, and permitting. Proper assignment and numbering reduce confusion, prevent duplication, and improve public safety.

A. Assignment During Development Review
All new subdivisions or multi-unit residential, commercial, or mixed-use developments shall be reviewed for logical and sequential address assignment at the time of final map or site plan approval.

Address ranges will be coordinated with Public Works, Building & Safety, Fire Department, and USPS to ensure consistency and emergency response readiness. Addresses will be assigned upon 818
City of Banning
Administrative Procedures
Addressing Policy
POLICY NO:

F-4

ORIGINATING
DEPARTMENT:

Community
Development
DIVISION:

Planning
ADOPTION DATE:
12/09/2025
APPROVED BY:

City Council
LAST AMENDED:

SUPERSEDES:

F-3
REFERENCE:

N/A
PAGE 10 of 18
recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits, as appropriate.

B. Unit and Suite Numbering Standards

1. Unit and suite numbers shall follow a three-digit format, with the first digit indicating the floor level (e.g., 101 for first floor, 201 for second floor).

2. Numbering should begin at the northeast corner of the building and proceed clockwise unless site geometry requires counter-clockwise sequencing.

3. All primary and rear access doors must display unit or suite numbers at a minimum 6-inch height, clearly visible to emergency personnel.

4. Multi-unit complexes must install a Site Map Display Board near the primary vehicle/pedestrian entrance, showing building layout and corresponding unit/suite addresses. The board shall be illuminated, weather-resistant, and include building identifiers, unit ranges, and a “You Are Here” indicator.

5.6 Accessory Dwelling Unit Addressing
Addressing for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and, when applicable, Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs), shall be assigned in a manner that supports emergency response, postal delivery, and utility coordination, and that complies with State law and the Banning Municipal Code as they exist at the time of review.

Because State regulations governing ADUs and JADUs are subject to change, the Director or designee shall determine the appropriate address format based on current legal requirements, site configuration, access, and operational needs.

ADUs and JADUs may be assigned either:
• a unique primary address, or
• a sub-address associated with the primary dwelling,
as deemed appropriate by block or designee to maintain logical sequencing, support emergency response, and ensure consistency with surrounding addresses.

The City generally avoids new fractional or alphabetic suffixes (e.g., “123½”, “123A”) unless needed for consistency with legacy addressing or external agency systems. 819
City of Banning
Administrative Procedures
Addressing Policy
POLICY NO:

F-4

ORIGINATING
DEPARTMENT:

Community
Development
DIVISION:

Planning
ADOPTION DATE:
12/09/2025
APPROVED BY:

City Council
LAST AMENDED:

SUPERSEDES:

F-3
REFERENCE:

N/A
PAGE 11 of 18
Applicants must provide a site plan identifying the unit location, access path, and visibility.

Approved address numbers or sub-addresses shall be clearly posted on the unit or, if not visible from the public right-of-way, at the point of access consistent with Section 4.3 of this Policy.

SECTION 6: UTILITY AND METER ADDRESSING

6.1 Utility and Fractional Addressing Standards
Utility/fractional addresses are non-deliverable and intended for inter-agency identification only. • ½: Irrigation meter will have the same number as the parcel but also have ½ added to it.

Multiples will have an alphabet letter after i.e. 1025 ½ A: For example, “1355 ½ Landmark Way – Ped “A”, “B”.
• ⅓: Electric pedestal will have the same number as the parcel but also have 1/3 added to it.

Multiples will have an alphabet letter after i.e. 1025 1/3 A: For example, “1355 1/3 Landmark Way – Ped “A”, “B””.
• ¼: Fire protection system will have the same number as the parcel but also have ¼ added. • ¾: Cell tower meters will have ¾ added if there are more than one on the site e.g., 123¾ A, 123 ¾ B
• Hydrant meters shall be addressed by the cross streets of the hydrant, and including the hydrant number, to the greatest extent possible.
• TEMP: Construction power poles Utility and infrastructure addresses must be assigned and documented but are not intended for postal delivery.

6.1 Temporary Power (TEMP) Addresses
TEMP addresses are assigned exclusively to temporary electrical service poles or other interim power sources associated with construction activity. They are intended to facilitate electric service setup, inspection, and tracking by the City and Banning Electric Utility.

Standards and Procedures:

1. TEMP addresses shall be requested using the City’s addressing application form and must include a valid building or grading permit number.

2. TEMP addresses shall be labeled in all systems with the prefix “TEMP” (e.g., TEMP 1250 Ramsey Street) to distinguish them from permanent addresses.

3. TEMP addresses shall not be used for occupancy, postal delivery, or any non-utility purpose.
820
City of Banning
Administrative Procedures
Addressing Policy
POLICY NO:

F-4

ORIGINATING
DEPARTMENT:

Community
Development
DIVISION:

Planning
ADOPTION DATE:
12/09/2025
APPROVED BY:

City Council
LAST AMENDED:

SUPERSEDES:

F-3
REFERENCE:

N/A
PAGE 12 of 18

4. TEMP signage shall be posted at the pole or service location using reflective material, minimum 4-inch numerals, visible from the nearest public right-of-way.

5. TEMP addresses shall automatically expire and be retired from the Master Address Database upon permanent power release or project completion.

6. Upon retirement, the permanent address shall be re-verified across all systems to ensure data integrity.

SECTION 7: STREET ADDRESSING

7.1 Street Naming and Suffix Guidelines
Street naming shall comply with USPS Publication 28 suffix standards (e.g., Street, Avenue, Boulevard) and must avoid duplication or phonetic similarity to existing names within the City or surrounding jurisdictions. Names shall be simple, clear, and not exceed twenty (20) characters including the suffix. Cardinal directions (e.g., North, South, East, West) may not be used as standalone street names. Continuous road segments must retain the same name unless the alignment changes by more than 45 degrees, in which case a new street name shall be assigned. Prohibited names include offensive or derogatory terms, commercial/advertising names, confusing or cumbersome spellings, and standalone cardinal directions.

Directional Prefixes:

Directional prefixes (N, S, E, W) may be applied where needed to distinguish otherwise similar street names and to reflect the City’s grid system. Generally:
• “North” and “South” apply to streets that intersect or cross Ramsey Street (the east–west baseline); and
• “East” and “West” apply to streets that intersect or cross San Gorgonio Avenue (the north–south baseline), as determined by the Community Development Director or designee to avoid confusion and support emergency response.

Approved Street Suffixes:

The following table lists commonly approved street suffixes for the City of Banning. These suffixes align with USPS Publication 28, Utility Billing, and local emergency response practices.

Suffix Abbreviation Definition / Common Use Type
Alley ALY Narrow service or rear-access way. NA
Avenue AVE A thoroughfare running at an angle to streets; often wider than a street. Any
821
City of Banning
Administrative Procedures
Addressing Policy
POLICY NO:

F-4

ORIGINATING
DEPARTMENT:

Community
Development
DIVISION:

Planning
ADOPTION DATE:
12/09/2025
APPROVED BY:

City Council
LAST AMENDED:

SUPERSEDES:

F-3
REFERENCE:

N/A
PAGE 13 of 18
Boulevard BLVD Wide roadway with landscaping or median. Any Circle CIR Circular or looping road. Any
Court CT Short street ending in a cul-de-sac. Cul-de-sac Crescent CRES Curved residential street. Any
Drive DR Curving or winding road, often in suburbs. Curving Green GRN Residential street with or near landscaped areas. Any Grove GRV Short, wooded or tree-lined street. Any
Heights HTS Street on high ground or ridge. Any
Hill HL Road climbing or situated on a hill. Any
Lane LN Narrow street, sometimes residential or rural. Curving Park PARK Street near or within greenbelt/open space. Any Place PL Small, quiet street or dead-end. Cul-de-sac
Plaza PLZ Commercial or civic square or internal drive. Any Road RD General-purpose route, often longer than a street. Any Row ROW Linear street with similar townhomes or
buildings. Any
Square SQ Urban space, often surrounded by buildings. Any Street ST Standard road in urban grid. Any
Terrace TER Small residential road or elevated terrain. Minor Private Street Trail TRL Road or path that follows terrain. Any
View VW Street with scenic or elevated outlook. Any
Way WAY General-purpose road, often in newer
developments. Any

7.2 Street Naming Procedure
To request a new street name, applicants shall:
• Submit at least three preferred names with definitions. • Ensure proposed names avoid duplication or phonetic similarity to existing street names within the City or surrounding jurisdictions.
• Provide justification for commemorative or theme-based names when applicable. • Show all proposed street names on Tentative Maps and submit them for City Council review and approval.
822
City of Banning
Administrative Procedures
Addressing Policy
POLICY NO:

F-4

ORIGINATING
DEPARTMENT:

Community
Development
DIVISION:

Planning
ADOPTION DATE:
12/09/2025
APPROVED BY:

City Council
LAST AMENDED:

SUPERSEDES:

F-3
REFERENCE:

N/A
PAGE 14 of 18
• Obtain City Council approval for any change to approved street names prior to recordation of a Final Map.
• Apply the same naming standards to private streets and gated drives, which may be required to carry a street-type name if they provide the primary or sole emergency access to a development.

7.3 Street Renaming (Existing Streets)
Renaming an existing street shall follow these requirements:
• A written petition signed by sixty percent of the representative group of affected property owners must be submitted to the City.
• The applicant shall coordinate preparation of the Certificate of Correction through the City’s Engineering Division prior to recordation with the County. • Renaming requests must demonstrate that the proposed name complies with established naming standards, avoids duplication or phonetic similarity, and uses appropriate suffixes. • City Council approval is required at a public hearing. • Public notice shall be mailed to adjacent property owners and published in a newspaper of general circulation at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. • A Certificate of Correction to the recorded subdivision map shall be prepared and recorded with the County to formally document the name change.
• The applicant shall bear the full cost of renaming, including the Certificate of Correction, signage replacement, and notification of all affected agencies and utilities. • Once approved, the City shall coordinate re-signing and provide official notice to agencies including USPS, emergency services, utility providers, and local school districts.

After City Council approval and recordation of the street name change, the City will transmit the information to Riverside County for integration into County GIS and addressing systems. The timeframe for the change to appear in County or regional digital maps may vary. Property owners, developers, or agencies needing confirmation of the update’s effective date should contact Riverside County GIS or the County’s Mapping and Land Records Division directly to verify when the change has been reflected in the County’s system.

7.4 Street Name Evaluation Criteria
The following criteria guide the City’s evaluation of proposed new or modified street names:
823
City of Banning
Administrative Procedures
Addressing Policy
POLICY NO:

F-4

ORIGINATING
DEPARTMENT:

Community
Development
DIVISION:

Planning
ADOPTION DATE:
12/09/2025
APPROVED BY:

City Council
LAST AMENDED:

SUPERSEDES:

F-3
REFERENCE:

N/A
PAGE 15 of 18
• Clarity: Simple spelling and easy pronunciation in voice dispatch; no punctuation, diacritics, special characters, or numerals in the name.
• Commemorative Names: Provide biography/justification; avoid living persons unless Council policy allows; ensure no conflict or confusion with existing names. • Continuity: Continuous roads keep one name; if alignment changes by more than 45 degrees, a new name may be required.
• Length: Prefer no more than twenty (20) characters including spaces and suffix; shorter names are preferred for signage and emergency dispatch.
• Map Coordination: Names must appear on the Final Map for recordation and require Council approval.
• Private Streets: Apply the same criteria to private streets/gated drives; require a street-type name if they serve as the sole emergency access.
• Prohibited Words: No commercial/advertising content, offensive/derogatory terms, or standalone cardinal directions.
• Suffix Appropriateness: Suffix must match functional class/form (see Section 7.1). No unconventional or non-USPS suffixes.
• Theme (Subdivisions): Tracts may use a coherent theme; avoid thematic similarity that introduces phonetic confusion (e.g., Beach/Beech/Peach). • Uniqueness: Must not duplicate or phonetically resemble existing names within the City or surrounding jurisdictions.

SECTION 8: ADDRESSING FOR PHASED PROJECTS
Phased or master-planned developments must submit a comprehensive Addressing Plan during initial entitlement or final map submittal. The Addressing Plan must show phase boundaries, street layouts, lot or unit configurations, proposed address ranges, and utility meter locations. Address ranges must follow the City’s grid-based numbering system and preserve logical sequencing across all phases.

Addresses may be issued prior to the assignment of Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) to support:
• Utility coordination (e.g., electric, gas, communications) • Permit submittals and plan check
• Emergency response planning
• Model home installations or phased sales release
Issued addresses are conditional upon final approval of tract configuration and are subject to modification if phasing changes or final maps are adjusted. Only addresses for the currently active 824
City of Banning
Administrative Procedures
Addressing Policy
POLICY NO:

F-4

ORIGINATING
DEPARTMENT:

Community
Development
DIVISION:

Planning
ADOPTION DATE:
12/09/2025
APPROVED BY:

City Council
LAST AMENDED:

SUPERSEDES:

F-3
REFERENCE:

N/A
PAGE 16 of 18
construction phase will be activated. Developers are responsible for submitting updated plans as phases evolve.

All address numbers must be posted per Section 5 before inspections or occupancy. Address monuments or directional signage are required for any homes or units not directly visible from public streets.

If requested before APNs have been issued, preliminary addresses may be assigned for utility coordination, plan check, and construction phasing. However, APNs or proof of recorded map must be provided prior to formal address confirmation. Only addresses associated with an active construction phase will be activated. The City may modify or reissue addresses if final APNs or phasing plans change. All posted address signage must comply with Section 5 before inspections or occupancy.

SECTION 9: TEMPORARY ROAD CLOSURE
During construction or closures affecting postal delivery, the City coordinates with USPS to establish a safe temporary mail delivery location and notifies affected occupants and agencies.

Temporary delivery points shall expire upon restoration of access, and USPS confirmation shall be obtained before closure of the temporary site.

SECTION 10: AGENCY NOTIFICATION
Upon assignment or verification of addresses, the City of Banning shall notify all applicable internal departments and external agencies to ensure consistency across operational, emergency, and utility systems. Notification shall include, but is not limited to:

Internal Departments:
• Banning Electric Utility
• Banning Police Department
• Community Development Department
• Building and Safety Division
• Office of the Fire Marshal
• Planning Division
• Public Works – Engineering Division
• Utility Billing Division
External Agencies:
825
City of Banning
Administrative Procedures
Addressing Policy
POLICY NO:

F-4

ORIGINATING
DEPARTMENT:

Community
Development
DIVISION:

Planning
ADOPTION DATE:
12/09/2025
APPROVED BY:

City Council
LAST AMENDED:

SUPERSEDES:

F-3
REFERENCE:

N/A
PAGE 17 of 18
• Banning Unified School District
• GIS Mapping Systems
• Morongo Fire
• Refuse Service
• Riverside County Assessor’s Office
• Riverside County Emergency Communications (Sheriffs)
• Riverside County Registrar of Voters
• Southern California Gas Company
• United States Postal Service (USPS)
These notifications support proper service connection, emergency dispatch readiness, and address validation for public records. Notifications shall be issued concurrently with the address assignment letter to maintain data consistency across systems. City will submit changes to USPS Address Management System (AMS).

SECTION 11: LEGAL INCONSISTENCIES
Legal discrepancies among permitting, GIS, billing or utility records shall be corrected on a from-here-forward basis to avoid disruption of existing services. Corrections shall be applied prospectively (forward fix) and not retroactively where they would disrupt existing utility accounts, postal delivery, or 911 records. Where corrections affect commercial or multi-family properties, the City will coordinate review with Fire, Building and Safety, Public Works, Police, and utilities before finalizing changes. Public safety concerns may warrant immediate correction.

Prospective (forward-fix) is preferred. Retroactive renumbering may be used when (a) life-safety is affected, (b) duplication exists on the same blockface, or (c) the wrong parity spans ≥3 consecutive lots.

SECTION 12: FEES
All address-related fees shall be charged in accordance with the City’s Master Fee Schedule and any other fee schedule(s) adopted by the City Council, including fees established by resolution related to addressing. Fees must be paid at the time of submittal and are non-refundable unless otherwise specified by City Council action.

SECTION 13: DIGITAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND SIGNAGE 826
City of Banning
Administrative Procedures
Addressing Policy
POLICY NO:

F-4

ORIGINATING
DEPARTMENT:

Community
Development
DIVISION:

Planning
ADOPTION DATE:
12/09/2025
APPROVED BY:

City Council
LAST AMENDED:

SUPERSEDES:

F-3
REFERENCE:

N/A
PAGE 18 of 18

COMPLAINCE
All applications must include a completed addressing application form provided by the Community Development Department, a site plan and/or floor plan in PDF, and, for multi-unit developments, a breakdown of unit numbering logic, access points, and utility meter locations. Submittals must clearly identify address display locations.

Failure to meet Fire Department visibility and posting standards may delay inspections, utility releases, or occupancy. Incomplete applications will be deemed not accepted and returned with a deficiency list.
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
See Proof on Next Page

AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Record Gazette
218 N. Murray St., Banning, CA 92220
Proof of Publication
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
Notice of Public Hearing
___________________________________________________
State of California )
County of Riverside ) SS.

I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of Record Gazette, a newspaper published in the English language in the City of Banning, County of Riverside, and adjudicated a newspaper of
general circulation as defined by the laws of the state of California by the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, under the date October 14, 1966, Case No. 54737.

That the notice, of which the annexed is a copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:

Nov 28, 2025
Executed on: ____________________
At City of Banning, California
I ceritfy (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
___________________________________________________
Signature
Notice of Public Hearing | Page 1 of 2
November 28th, 2025
834
Notice of Public Hearing | Page 2 of 2
835

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Arturo Vela, Interim City Manager
PREPARED BY: Brandon Smith, Lieutenant
Vince Avila, Chief of Police
MEETING DATE: December 9, 2025
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution 2025-164, Approving the Purchase of 45 Axon Taser 10 Electronic Control Devices, Accessories, Evidence.com Storage, and Virtual Reality Training Equipment
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2025-164.

BACKGROUND:

In 2013 the Banning Police Department transitioned from the Axon Taser X26 to the more advanced Axon Taser X2. The transition allowed officers to quickly deploy two sets of probes for single or multiple target engagement without having to reload a second cartridge. One drawback to the X2 device was the effectiveness in close quarters situations where deployed probes did not have the distance to create the spread needed for neuromuscular incapacitation. To address this drawback Axon released the Taser 10 device in 2024. The new Taser 10 allows for a single probe to be fired with every trigger pull and makes it easier to get the desired probe spread to safely cause neuromuscular incapacitation.

Advantages of transitioning from Taser X2 to Taser 10:

Standoff Range: Increases from 25 feet to up to 45 feet (increases officer safety).

Probe/Shot Capacity: Increases from 2 cartridges (two shots) to 10 individually fired probes (increases effectiveness and officer safety).

Targeting System: From dual laser system with standard accuracy to advanced green laser targeting with 200+ fps for enhanced accuracy.

Adaptive Cross-Connect: Taser 10 uses advanced technology to optimize electrical pulse delivery.

Precision Deployment: Each probe can be individually placed for optimal effectiveness.

Auditory Warnings: Enhanced sound features for improved de-escalation capabilities.

JUSTIFICATION:

After approximately 12 years of Axon's Taser X2 being utilized by the Banning Police Department as a trusted less-lethal electronic control device (ECD), the Banning Police Department is in need of updated officer safety equipment. The Taser X2 was originally released in 2011 and was discontinued in 2024 (13 year product life). Only a handful of devices in the department's inventory are still serviceable under original purchase warranties and the remaining devices have no service support should they become inoperable for any reason.

The Axon Taser 7 has been on the market for 7 years, having been released in 2018, and replaced the Taser X3 (released 2009 - discontinued 2018, 9 year product life). The Taser 7 offers upgraded features 836
but operates much like the Taser X2 and has the same limitations. Based on life-span of previous product models developed by Axon, the Banning Police Department seeks to utilize the most up-to-date technology available. The decision to upgrade the department's equipment to the Taser 10 will ensure department personnel are best equipped to safely provide law enforcement service to the citizens and visitors of the City of Banning.

The Taser 10 purchase will include training aids (training cartridge suit, interactive virtual reality training system, training cartridges, and Taser instructor certification), and all needed holsters, batteries, charging docks, and cartridges (live, training, and inert). Over the 5-year payment term all replacement items will come at no charge (including replacement of used cartridges and warranty needs).

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Banning Police Department aims to utilize Supplemental Law Enforcement funding from Fund 148 (Supplemental Law Enforcement Fund), Account 148-2200-421.90-56 (Machinery Equipment) to make the purchase of Axon Taser 10 devices and accessories in 5 annual payments for a total purchase of $282,338.63. An appropriation is required for the first purchase this fiscal year. Future budgets will include the needed funds in the account. The current balance of Fund 148 is $359,990.59. The purchase will be made directly through Axon Enterprises Inc. through Sourcewell CEW Contract # 092722-AXN.

February 2026 - $56,467.73
February 2027 - $56,467.73
February 2028 - $56,467.73
February 2029 - $56,467.73
February 2030 - $56,467.71
Total - $282,338.63
ALTERNATIVES:

Do not adopt Resolution 2025-164 and provide alternative direction to staff.

BUDGETED?:

Yes
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT:

No
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution_2025-164.docx

2. Banning Police Dept. - CA - T10 Cert Pro Sourcewell Quote.pdf

3. Banning Police Department - T10 Presentation.pptx
837
Resolution 2025-164

Page 1 of 4 ends

RESOLUTION 2025-164

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF 45 AXON TASER 10 ELECTRONIC CONTROL DEVICES (ECD), ACCESSORIES, EVIDENCE.COM STORAGE, AND VIRTUAL REALITY TRAINING

EQUIPMENT
WHEREAS, on December 9th, 2025, the City of Banning, on resolution 2025-164 approved the purchase of forty-five (45) Axon Taser 10 Electronic Control Devices, accessories, Evidence.com storage, and virtual reality training equipment; and WHEREAS, the forty-five Axon Taser 10 ECDs will be purchased directly through Axon under a Sourcewell purchasing cooperative (Contract # 092722-AXN); and WHEREAS, the purchased will be billed annually over five years, with four payments of $56,467.73 and one payment of $56,467.71; and
WHEREAS, the total for the five annual payments will not exceed the amount of $282,338.63; and
WHEREAS, the total of $282,338.63 will be paid utilizing the Fund 148 Account No. 148- 2200-421.90-56, which will require an appropriation for the first year.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council adopts Resolution 2025-164 and approves the purchase of fortyfive Axon Taser 10 ECDs, accessories, Evidence.com storage, and virtual reality training equipment.

SECTION 2. The City Council authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to make necessary budget adjustments, appropriations, and transfers related to this resolution.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of December, 2025.

Sheri Flynn, Mayor
City of Banning
ATTEST:

Sandra Calderon, Acting Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning
838
Resolution 2025-164

Page 2 of 4 ends

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

John Pinkney, City Attorney
Slovak, Baron, Empey, Murphy, & Pinkney LLP
839
Resolution 2025-164

Page 3 of 4 ends

CERTIFICATION:

I, Sandra Calderon, Acting Deputy City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2025-164, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 9th day of December, 2025 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Sandra Calderon, Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning, California
840
Resolution 2025-164

Page 4 of 4 ends

EXHIBIT A
Banning Police Dept. – CA – T10 Cert Pro Sourcewell Quote 841

Page 1 ends

Q-756601-45979AS
Issued: 11/18/2025
Quote Expiration: 12/26/2025
Estimated Contract Start Date: 03/01/2026
Account Number: 144246
Payment Terms: N30
Mode of Delivery: UPS-GND
Credit/Debit Amount: $0.00

SHIP TO BILL TO SALES REPRESENTATIVE PRIMARY CONTACT
Banning Police Dept. - CA
125 E Ramsey St
Banning,
CA
92220-4839
USA
Banning Police Dept. - CA
PO Box 998
Banning
CA
92220-0007
USA
Email:

Adam Smith
Phone: 602-751-1798
Email: [email protected]
Fax: (480) 463-2201
Brian Walker
Phone: 951-849-1445
Email: [email protected]
Fax:

Quote Summary Discount Summary
Program Length 60 Months Average Savings Per Year $24,046.11 TOTAL COST $265,020.00
ESTIMATED TOTAL W/ TAX $282,338.63 TOTAL SAVINGS $120,230.55 Axon Enterprise, Inc.
17800 N 85th St
Scottsdale, Arizona 85255
United States
VAT: 86-0741227
Domestic:(800) 978-2737
International: +1.800.978.2737
842

Page 2 ends

Payment Summary
Date Subtotal Tax Total
Feb 2026 $53,004.00 $3,463.73 $56,467.73
Feb 2027 $53,004.00 $3,463.73 $56,467.73
Feb 2028 $53,004.00 $3,463.73 $56,467.73
Feb 2029 $53,004.00 $3,463.73 $56,467.73
Feb 2030 $53,004.00 $3,463.71 $56,467.71
Total $265,020.00 $17,318.63 $282,338.63
843

Page 3 ends

Quote Unbundled Price: $385,242.00
Quote List Price: $301,191.00
Quote Subtotal: $265,020.00
Pricing
All deliverables are detailed in Delivery Schedules section lower in proposal Item Description Qty Term Unbundled List Price Net Price Subtotal Tax Total Program
C00022 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 45 60 $139.46 $108.33 $95.32 $257,364.00 $17,318.63 $274,682.63 A la Carte Services
101208 AXON TASER 10 - 2 DAY INSTRUCTOR COURSE - INSIDE SALES 1 $2,700.00 $2,376.00 $2,376.00 $0.00 $2,376.00
20379 AXON VR - PSO - FULL INSTALLATION - INSIDE SALES 1 $6,000.00 $5,280.00 $5,280.00 $0.00 $5,280.00 Total $265,020.00 $17,318.63 $282,338.63
Delivery Schedule
Hardware
Bundle Item Description QTY Shipping Location Estimated Delivery Date BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100126 AXON VR - TACTICAL BAG 2 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100390 AXON TASER 10 - HANDLE - YELLOW CLASS 3R 1 2 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100390 AXON TASER 10 - HANDLE - YELLOW CLASS 3R 45 2 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100394 AXON TASER 10 - MAGAZINE - HALT TRAINING BLUE 4 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100396 AXON TASER 10 - MAGAZINE - INERT RED 1 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100399 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - LIVE 900 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100400 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - HALT 450 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100401 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - INERT 20 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100591 AXON TASER - CLEANING KIT 1 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100611 AXON TASER 10 - SAFARILAND HOLSTER - RH 45 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100623 ENHANCED HOOK-AND-LOOP TRAINING (HALT) SUIT (V2) 1 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100748 AXON VR - CONTROLLER - TASER 10 2 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100832 AXON VR - CONTROLLER - HANDGUN VR19H 2 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 101122 AXON VR - HOLSTER - T10 SAFARILAND GRAY - RH 2 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 101294 AXON VR - TABLET 2 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 101300 AXON VR - TABLET CASE 2 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 101455 AXON TASER 10 - REPLACEMENT TOOL KIT - INTERPOSER BUCKET 1 1 02/01/2026
BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 101456 AXON TASER 10 - REPLACEMENT INTERPOSER BUCKET 1 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 101751 AXON VR - HEADSET - HTC FOCUS VISION 2 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 101755 AXON TASER 10 - MAGAZINE - LIVE DUTY BLACK V2 1 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 101755 AXON TASER 10 - MAGAZINE - LIVE DUTY BLACK V2 45 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 101757 AXON TASER 10 - MAGAZINE - LIVE TRAINING PURPLE V2 3 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 20018 AXON TASER - BATTERY PACK - TACTICAL 45 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 20018 AXON TASER - BATTERY PACK - TACTICAL 9 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 20018 AXON TASER - BATTERY PACK - TACTICAL 1 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 70033 AXON - DOCK WALL MOUNT - BRACKET ASSY 1 1 02/01/2026 844

Page 4 ends

Hardware
Bundle Item Description QTY Shipping Location Estimated Delivery Date BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 71019 AXON BODY - DOCK POWERCORD - NORTH AMERICA 1 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 74200 AXON TASER - DOCK - SIX BAY PLUS CORE 1 1 02/01/2026 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 80087 AXON TASER - TARGET - CONDUCTIVE PROFESSIONAL RUGGEDIZED 1 1 02/01/2026
BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 80090 AXON TASER - TARGET FRAME - PROFESSIONAL 27.5 IN X 75 IN 1 1 02/01/2026
BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100399 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - LIVE 140 1 02/01/2027 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100400 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - HALT 360 1 02/01/2027 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100399 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - LIVE 130 1 02/01/2028 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100400 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - HALT 360 1 02/01/2028 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100210 AXON VR - TAP REFRESH 1 - TABLET 2 1 08/01/2028 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 101009 AXON VR - TAP REFRESH 1 - SIDEARM CONTROLLER 2 1 08/01/2028 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 101012 AXON VR - TAP REFRESH 1 - CONTROLLER 2 1 08/01/2028 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 20373 AXON VR - TAP REFRESH 1 - HEADSET 2 1 08/01/2028 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100399 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - LIVE 140 1 02/01/2029 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100400 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - HALT 360 1 02/01/2029 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100399 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - LIVE 130 1 02/01/2030 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100400 AXON TASER 10 - CARTRIDGE - HALT 360 1 02/01/2030 Software
Bundle Item Description QTY Estimated Start Date Estimated End Date BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 101180 AXON TASER - DATA SCIENCE PROGRAM 45 03/01/2026 02/28/2031 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 20248 AXON TASER - EVIDENCE.COM LICENSE 1 03/01/2026 02/28/2031 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 20248 AXON TASER - EVIDENCE.COM LICENSE 45 03/01/2026 02/28/2031 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 20370 AXON VR - USER ACCESS - FULL VR 45 03/01/2026 02/28/2031 Services
Bundle Item Description QTY
BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100751 AXON TASER 10 - REPLACEMENT ACCESS PROGRAM - DUTY CARTRIDGE 45 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 101193 AXON TASER - ON DEMAND CERTIFICATION 45 A la Carte 101208 AXON TASER 10 - 2 DAY INSTRUCTOR COURSE - INSIDE SALES 1 A la Carte 20379 AXON VR - PSO - FULL INSTALLATION - INSIDE SALES 1 Warranties
Bundle Item Description QTY Estimated Start Date Estimated End Date BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100197 AXON VR - EXT WARRANTY - HEADSET 2 02/01/2027 02/28/2031 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100213 AXON VR - EXT WARRANTY - TABLET 2 02/01/2027 02/28/2031 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100704 AXON TASER 10 - EXT WARRANTY - HANDLE 45 02/01/2027 02/28/2031 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 100704 AXON TASER 10 - EXT WARRANTY - HANDLE 1 02/01/2027 02/28/2031 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 101007 AXON VR - EXT WARRANTY - CONTROLLER 2 02/01/2027 02/28/2031 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 101008 AXON VR - EXT WARRANTY - HANDGUN CONTROLLER 2 02/01/2027 02/28/2031 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 80374 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - BATTERY PACK T7/T10 1 02/01/2027 02/28/2031 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 80374 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - BATTERY PACK T7/T10 9 02/01/2027 02/28/2031 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 80374 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - BATTERY PACK T7/T10 45 02/01/2027 02/28/2031 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 80396 AXON TASER - EXT WARRANTY - DOCK SIX BAY T7/T10 1 02/01/2027 02/28/2031 845

Page 5 ends

Shipping Locations
Location Number Street City State Zip Country
1 125 E Ramsey St Banning CA 92220-4839 USA
2 125 E Ramsey St Banning CA 92220-4839 USA
Payment Details
Feb 2026
Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total
Year 1 101208 AXON TASER 10 - 2 DAY INSTRUCTOR COURSE - INSIDE SALES 1 $475.20 $0.00 $475.20 Year 1 20379 AXON VR - PSO - FULL INSTALLATION - INSIDE SALES 1 $1,056.00 $0.00 $1,056.00 Year 1 C00022 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 45 $51,472.80 $3,463.73 $54,936.53 Total $53,004.00 $3,463.73 $56,467.73
Feb 2027
Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total
Year 2 101208 AXON TASER 10 - 2 DAY INSTRUCTOR COURSE - INSIDE SALES 1 $475.20 $0.00 $475.20 Year 2 20379 AXON VR - PSO - FULL INSTALLATION - INSIDE SALES 1 $1,056.00 $0.00 $1,056.00 Year 2 C00022 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 45 $51,472.80 $3,463.73 $54,936.53 Total $53,004.00 $3,463.73 $56,467.73
Feb 2028
Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total
Year 3 101208 AXON TASER 10 - 2 DAY INSTRUCTOR COURSE - INSIDE SALES 1 $475.20 $0.00 $475.20 Year 3 20379 AXON VR - PSO - FULL INSTALLATION - INSIDE SALES 1 $1,056.00 $0.00 $1,056.00 Year 3 C00022 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 45 $51,472.80 $3,463.73 $54,936.53 Total $53,004.00 $3,463.73 $56,467.73
Feb 2029
Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total
Year 4 101208 AXON TASER 10 - 2 DAY INSTRUCTOR COURSE - INSIDE SALES 1 $475.20 $0.00 $475.20 Year 4 20379 AXON VR - PSO - FULL INSTALLATION - INSIDE SALES 1 $1,056.00 $0.00 $1,056.00 Year 4 C00022 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 45 $51,472.80 $3,463.73 $54,936.53 Total $53,004.00 $3,463.73 $56,467.73
Feb 2030
Invoice Plan Item Description Qty Subtotal Tax Total
Year 5 101208 AXON TASER 10 - 2 DAY INSTRUCTOR COURSE - INSIDE SALES 1 $475.20 $0.00 $475.20 Year 5 20379 AXON VR - PSO - FULL INSTALLATION - INSIDE SALES 1 $1,056.00 $0.00 $1,056.00 Year 5 C00022 BUNDLE - TASER 10 CERTIFICATION PRO 45 $51,472.80 $3,463.71 $54,936.51 Total $53,004.00 $3,463.71 $56,467.71
846

Page 6 ends

Tax is estimated based on rates applicable at date of quote and subject to change at time of invoicing. If a tax exemption certificate should be applied, please submit prior to invoicing.

Contract Sourcewell CEW Contract #092722-AXN is incorporated by reference into the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event of conflict the terms of Axon's Master Services and Purchasing Agreement shall govern.

Standard Terms and Conditions
Axon Enterprise Inc. Sales Terms and Conditions
Axon Master Services and Purchasing Agreement:

This Quote is limited to and conditional upon your acceptance of the provisions set forth herein and Axon’s Master Services and Purchasing Agreement (posted at https://www.axon.com/sales-terms-and-conditions), as well as the attached Statement of Work (SOW) for Axon Fleet and/or Axon Interview Room purchase, if applicable. In the event you and Axon have entered into a prior agreement to govern all future purchases, that agreement shall govern to the extent it includes the products and services being purchased and does not conflict with the Axon Customer Experience Improvement Program Appendix as described below.

ACEIP:

The Axon Customer Experience Improvement Program Appendix, which includes the sharing of de-identified segments of Agency Content with Axon to develop new products and improve your product experience (posted at www.axon.com/legal/sales-terms-and-conditions), is incorporated herein by reference. By signing below, you agree to the terms of the Axon Customer Experience Improvement Program.

Acceptance of Terms:

Any purchase order issued in response to this Quote is subject solely to the above referenced terms and conditions. By signing below, you represent that you are lawfully able to enter into contracts. If you are signing on behalf of an entity (including but not limited to the company, municipality, or government agency for whom you work), you represent to Axon that you have legal authority to bind that entity. If you do not have this authority, please do not sign this Quote. 847

Page 7 ends

\s1\ \d1\
Signature Date Signed
11/18/2025
848
Banning Police
Department
TASER 10 Equipment Proposal
Quote Number: Q-756601-45979AS
Program Length: 60 months
Contract Start: March 1, 2026
Issued Date: November 18, 2025
Payment Terms: Net 30
Total Investment: $265,020.00
Total with Tax: $282,338.63
849
Program Overview
TASER 10
Certification Pro Bundle
Timeline
Mar 1 , 2026
Start Date
Feb
28,
2031
E nd
Date
Program Scope
• 45 TAS ER 1 0 Certification Pro units
• 60-month term with Net 30 payment terms
• Annual payments scheduled from Feb 2026 to Feb 2030
Key Inclusions
• TAS ER 1 0 Certification Pro Bundle Complete conducted energy weapon platform with certification
• Training & Instruction 2-Day Instructor Course and Axon VR PSO Full Installation • E xtended Warranties Full coverage for handles, batteries, dock, VR equipment Total Savings
• Total Program Savings: $1 20,230.55
• Average Savings Per Year: $24,046.11
850
TASER 10 Equipment Details
Package Overview
Qty: 45 units 60-month term
Hardware + VR + Training
Core Hardware
• TAS ER 1 0 Handles - 45 yellow Class 3R units
• Magazines & Cartridges - Live duty black (46), training purple (3), HALT training blue (4), plus 1 640 cartridges (live, halt, inert)
• Holsters & Power - 45 Safariland holsters, 55 tactical battery packs • Docking System - Six Bay dock plus core, wall mount bracket, power cord VR Equipment & Training
• VR Hardware - HTC Focus Vision headsets (2), TAS ER 1 0 controllers (2), handgun controllers (2), tablet and case
• Training Tools - Professional conductive target, target frame, enhanced hook-and-loop training suit, cleaning kit
• Services - TAS ER 1 0 2-Day Instructor Course, VR PSO Full Installation Warranties & Lifecycle Management
• E xtended Warranties - Full coverage for TAS ER 1 0 handles, battery packs, dock, VR equipment
• Scheduled Replenishments - Cartridge deliveries in 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030 • VR TAP Refresh - Tablets, controllers and headsets refresh at year 3 851
TASER X2 vs TASER 10 ‒ What's Improved
TASER X2
VS
TASER 10
Operational Impact
• Greater standoff distance enhances officer safety
• Precision placement of each probe increases
effectiveness
• 1 0 chances vs. 2 to achieve neuromuscular
incapacitation
• Superior performance in adverse weather conditions
Range & Capacity
Standoff Range
X2: Up to 25 feet TAS ER 1 0: Up to 45 feet 80% increase Probe/Shot Capacity
X2: 2 cartridges (two shots) TAS ER 1 0: 1 0 individually fired probes 5x capacity Technology Improvements
Targeting System
X2: Dual laser system TAS ER 1 0: Advanced green laser targeting Accuracy
X2: Standard accuracy TAS ER 1 0: Enhanced accuracy with 200+ fps velocity Weather Resistance
X2: Standard protection TAS ER 1 0: IP67 rated (dust-tight & waterproof) Advanced Features
• Adaptive Cross-Connect: TAS ER 1 0 uses advanced technology to optimize electrical pulse delivery
• Precision Deployment: E ach probe can be individually placed for optimal 852
Why Upgrade Now
TASER 10
Next Generation Safety Technology
Critical Upgrades:
✓ 80% Greater Range
✓ 5x More Deployment Options
✓ Enhanced Accuracy
✓ IP67 Weather Resistance
✓ Advanced Targeting System
Key Reasons to Upgrade
1 Enhanced Officer Safety
The TASER 10's extended 45-foot range (vs 25-foot with X2) provides a critical safety buffer for officers. With 10 individually fired probes, officers gain multiple deployment opportunities without reloading, ensuring greater control in high-stress situations. 2 Superior Effectiveness
Improved targeting system with green laser and 200+ fps velocity delivers more precise probe placement. Independent probe deployment allows officers to adapt to moving subjects, increasing successful neuro-muscular incapacitation (NMI) rates.
3 Reduced Liability & Better Documentation
Advanced data logging capabilities provide comprehensive deployment records. Improved weather resistance (IP67) ensures reliable function in all environmental conditions, reducing equipment failure risk.
4 VR Training Integration
Included VR training system with TASER 10-specific scenarios helps officers master the new technology quickly. Instructor certification ensures department-wide proficiency with minimal downtime.
5 Fiscal & Administrative Benefits
Contract locks in current pricing for 60 months. TAP (Technology Assurance Plan) ensures ongoing support and scheduled cartridge replenishments, eliminating administrative burdens. 853
Training, VR, and Software
Axon VR
Training
System
Immersive
scenariobased
learning
VR Training Workflow
1 Full Installation & Setup
Complete PSO deployment on-site
2 Instructor Certification
2-Day course for departmental trainers
3 Officer Training
Full access for all 45 users
Training & Services
TASER 10 – 2-Day Instructor Course
Comprehensive certification program for trainers to ensure proper deployment and use of TASER 10 technology
Axon VR PSO Full Installation
Professional services team handles complete setup, configuration, and initial training VR Access & Components
• Full VR user access for all 45 users
Complete access to the entire VR training library
• VR Equipment Bundle
HTC Focus Vision headsets, TASER 10 controllers, handgun controllers, tablets with cases • TAP Refresh Program
Scheduled component updates throughout the 60-month term Software & Evidence Management
• Evidence.com Licenses (46 total)
45 officer licenses + 1 agency-wide license
• Axon Data Science Program
854
Investment Summary
Total Investment
$265,020.00
Over 60 months ($4,417.00/month)
Program Items
Transfer Balance – Software & Services ($5,273.77)
Transfer Balance – Goods $16,351.40
TASER 10 Certification Pro (Bundle) $257,364.00
Services
TASER 10 2-Day Instructor Course $2,376.00
Axon VR PSO Full Installation $5,280.00
Total Investment
Subtotal (Before Tax): $265,020.00
Tax (estimated): $17,318.63
Total With Tax: $282,338.63
Savings Summary
Total Savings: $120,230.55
855
Payment Schedule
60-month payment plan with annual invoicing
Invoicing Schedule (Net 30)
• Feb 2026: $56,467.73
• Feb 2027: $56,467.73
• Feb 2028: $56,467.73
• Feb 2029: $56,467.73
• Feb 2030: $56,467.71
Σ Total Investment: $282,338.63
Payment Notes
• All payments include applicable taxes ($3,463.73/year) • Annual invoices will be issued with Net 30 payment terms • Payments cover TAS ER 1 0 equipment, cartridges, VR system, training, and software subscriptions
Tax amounts are estimated and subject to change at time of invoicing. Tax exemption certificate should be submitted prior to invoicing if applicable. 856

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Arturo Vela, Interim City Manager
PREPARED BY: Marisol Lopez, Economic Development Manager Art Vela Interim City Manager
MEETING DATE: December 9, 2025
SUBJECT: Non-Binding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Cities of Banning, Beaumont, Calimesa, and the Morongo Band of Mission Indians to Collaborate and Continue Discussions Toward the Formation of a Joint Powers Authority for Animal Control Services RECOMMENDATION:

Authorize the Interim City Manager to Sign a Non-Binding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Cities of Banning, Beaumont, Calimesa, and the Morongo Band of Mission Indians.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Banning currently has no active animal shelter, having ended its previous shelter contract in the summer of 2024. Since that time, the City has experienced a growing animal welfare crisis, as there are no official facilities to house stray or abandoned animals.

The absence of sheltering options has left the City's animal control services unable to impound or hold animals, leading to a long term and unstainable reliance on residents and rescue groups.

With the region’s pet population rising, operational costs escalating, and community expectations increasing, the need for a sustainable and humane regional solution has become urgent. Neighboring agencies, including the Cities of Beaumont and Calimesa and the Morongo Band of Mission Indians, are facing similar constraints and expressed interest in exploring a cooperative model to share costs and resources. In response, the partner agencies established a 2x2x2 subcommittee, consisting of two representatives from each jurisdiction, to evaluate potential regional strategies.

Banning's representatives in the 2x2x2 subcommittee are Mayor Sheri Flynn and Councilmember Cindy Barrington. The subcommittee has reviewed several service models and determined that a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) represents a promising long-term solution to achieve operational efficiency, stable funding, and consistent service delivery. One successful model examined by the group is Animal Friends of the Valleys (AFV) in Wildomar, a regional JPA that serves six municipalities in Riverside County. AFV demonstrates the advantages of collaborative governance, shared infrastructure, and economies of scale in animal welfare operations.

The proposed non-binding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is an initial, good-faith commitment to continue structured dialogue and coordinated feasibility evaluation among the participating agencies.

The MOU does not create binding financial obligations but establishes a formal mechanism for cooperation.
857
Objectives of the MOU include:

Continuing inter-agency coordination on the formation, structure, and governance of a potential Animal Control JPA.

Sharing operational data, reports, and feasibility analyses to inform decision-making.

Identifying service needs, facility capacities, and equitable cost-sharing options.

Advancing a humane, socially conscious approach to animal care, community education, and public safety.

JUSTIFICATION:

Approval of the Memorandum of Understanding is warranted to provide the City with a structured and collaborative path toward resolving its current animal welfare challenges. Without an active shelter or viable impound options, the City is unable to meet basic long-term public safety and animal care obligations, resulting in growing operational challenges for staff and an unsustainable reliance on residents and rescue groups.

The MOU offers a practical, no-risk framework to continue working with regional partners who are experiencing similar constraints and who have jointly identified the potential for a regional Joint Powers Authority as a long-term, cost-effective solution. By formalizing this cooperative effort, the City can participate in coordinated feasibility studies, share critical data, and evaluate equitable cost-sharing models while maintaining full discretion over any future commitments.

Adopting the MOU ensures the City remains an active partner in shaping a regional, humane, and financially sustainable animal care system that meets community expectations and supports public health and safety.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Not applicable.

ALTERNATIVES:

Do not approve staff's recommendation.

BUDGETED?:

No
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT:

No
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Animal_Control JPA MOU.pdf
858

!
" #"
!!"! $#"
!%
!!!#"#
&
'#!

##

# #(%!
)*'
#+!
,-./012345678239:6714/;567.6<=>0?:@A./16;1417.6;3BC5675236<;-1D.;C39

EFGHIJKLMNOLPJQEGKKOKRMNOLPJQNGSOIFTGMGKUVJWJKRJEGKUJQVOTTOJKXKUOGKT =Y3ZZ1Y;.[1ZC41914417;35/;-1>\54;.1/@A]FG^_JQL_FNOLOFT`FOKRGaH`SO^GRFK^PbOL_OKL_F IFGKOKRJQNGSOQJWKOGcJdFWKIFKLNJUFeF^LOJKfghhFLTFiMGKUL_FVJWJKRJEGKUJQVOTTOJK XKUOGKT`FOKRGQFUFWGSSPWF^JRKOjFUeJdFWFORKkGLOJKl
m_FaHWaJTFJQL_OTVnoOTLJFTLG`SOT_GQWGIFbJWpQJWL_FqGWLOFTLJ^JKLOKHF^JSSG`JWGLOdF UOT^HTTOJKTGKUFdGSHGLOJKTWFRGWUOKRL_FaJLFKLOGSQJWIGLOJKJQGrJOKLqJbFWTsHL_JWOLP =>t\u@A;3v43[.7141<.365Z56.25ZY36;43Z/14[.Y1/w,-./0?:419Z1Y;/;-1\54;.1/x28;85Z ^JIIOLIFKLLJFyaSJWFG^JJaFWGLOdFGKUTJ^OGSSP^JKT^OJHTGaaWJG^_LJGKOIGSbFSQGWFGKU aH`SO^TFWdO^FUFSOdFWPl

z*#
m_OTVnoT_GSS`F^JIFFQQF^LOdFHaJKL_FUGLFJQL_FSGTLTORKGLHWFGKUT_GSSWFIGOKOKFQQF^L QJWGaFWOJUJQJKF{|}PFGWMHKSFTTLFWIOKGLFUFGWSOFWaHWTHGKLLJeF^LOJKg`FSJbl

~*$%(!
m_FJ`F^LOdFTJQL_OTVnoOK^SHUFM`HLGWFKJLSOIOLFULJ
NJKLOKHOKRUOGSJRHFGKU^JJWUOKGLOJKGIJKRL_FqGWLOFTWFRGWUOKRL_FQJWIGLOJKM TLWH^LHWFMRJdFWKGK^FMGKUQHKUOKRIJUFSJQGaJLFKLOGSsKOIGSNJKLWJSrqsl

e_GWOKRWFSFdGKLUGLGMWFaJWLTMGKUJaFWGLOJKGSOKQJWIGLOJKLJOKQJWIQFGTO`OSOLPGKGSPTFTl

XUFKLOQPOKRTFWdO^FKFFUTMWFTJHW^F^GaG^OLOFTMGKUaJLFKLOGS^JTLT_GWOKRIF^_GKOTITl

qWJIJLOKRG!% %!%
!(#%
" L_GLaWOJWOLOjFT_HIGKFGKOIGS^GWFM
^JIIHKOLPFUH^GLOJKMGKUaH`SO^TGQFLPl

m_OTVnoOTKJK`OKUOKRGKUUJFTKJL^WFGLFGKPSFRGSJWQOKGK^OGSJ`SORGLOJKTGIJKRL_F qGWLOFTlkJqGWLPT_GSS`FJ`SORGLFULJFKLFWOKLJGQHLHWFrqsJWGKP^JKLWG^LQJWTFWdO^FTHKSFTT GKUHKLOSTH^_GKGRWFFIFKLOTUHSC5vv43[17BC15Y-\54;Cx/<3[146.6<B37Cw 859

!"#

$%&'
()*)
)
)
+,-./01234/156714,88.0-9/:,.0,;.<9,./=,88>;?<:.400@?/-,./<:<A/.1<:0B>0,-.0-9;:8011 [email protected]:C0C/:D-/./:EF>9;.;,8=<:10:.<A,88+,-./012

GHIJ

KLM I

NI
O,=4+,-.>14,88C01/E:,.0<:01.,AA-0?-010:.,./P0,:C<:0,8.0-:,.0.<?,-./=/?,.0/:D<-Q/:E E-<;?900./:E1,:CC/1=;11/<:1-08,.0C.<.40?<.0:./,8R+S234010-0?-010:.,./P0114,8810-P0,1 .40?-/9,->?</:.1<A=<:.,=.,:C=<<-C/:,./<:,9<:E.40+,-./012

TUN
V
W
XA,:>?-<P/1/<:<A.4/1567/1C0.0-9/:0C.<F0/:P,8/C<-;:0:A<-=0,F80Y1;=4C0.0-9/:,./<:
14,88:<.,AA0=..40P,8/C/.><A.40-09,/:/:E?-<P/1/<:1YD4/=414,88-09,/:/:A;88A<-=0,:C 0AA0=.2

Z[

I
34/15679,>F0,90:C0C<[email protected]:C0CF>9;.;,8D-/..0:=<:10:.<A,88+,-./012

\]^_`

34/15679,>F00@0=;.0C/:=<;:.0-?,-.1Y0,=4<AD4/=414,88F0C0090C<-/E/:,8Y,:C,88<A D4/=4.<E0.40-14,88=<:1./.;.0<:0,:C.401,90/:1.-;90:.2O80=.-<:/=1/E:,.;-0114,88F0 C0090CF/:C/:EA<-?;-?<101<A.4/15672
[aaLbc]Hdef [aaLbc]H[Ig f
hiebgd][jkbl
m>noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
p`I
NqL
X:.0-/9r/.>5,:,E0-
s,.0noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
UN
Ht
` u]Iv
5,::/:Ewx,11yy+Y
z0?-010:./:E.40r/.><Am0,;9<:.
hiebgd[llilp m>noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
[ c

ua]
X:.0-/9r/.>5,:,E0-

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
r<;:108A<-r/.><Am,::/:E
860

"#$%&"!

"&
%
'$

(
)*
+),

)
), )

-./0.112/.

3 &456#
78&&
6!

"#$%&"!3
"!" "9"&

$$
"
:9
$

861

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Arturo Vela, Interim City Manager
PREPARED BY: Nicole Jews, Human Resources Manager
Michelle Green, Acting Administrative Services Director, Art Vela, Interim City Manager
MEETING DATE: December 9, 2025
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution 2025-175, Authorizing the exception of the 180-Day Waiting Period for Retired Annuitant (RA) Bonnie Johnson RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2025-175.

BACKGROUND:

Since March 2025 the Finance Department has been at a critical juncture and required the guidance of an experienced fiscal services professional to ensure it continues on the path to efficient management and operation. During the March 25, 2025 City Council meeting Michelle Green, a CalPERS retiree, who has over 30 years’ experience in fiscal services, was appointed as the Interim Finance Director. As a Retired Annuitant, Ms. Green can only work an aggregate of 960 hours in a fiscal year regardless of how many CalPERS contracting agencies she works for during such period. Given the substantial amount of work, Ms. Green is near exhausting her remaining hours to assist the Finance Department. To maintain continuity of service in the Finance Department, it was necessary to request additional support for the Department to function.

In early October the city engaged Ms. Bonnie Johnson, also a CalPERS retiree, with over 30 years of experience in City management and fiscal operation in the municipal government realm, to fill the vacant Finance Director position on an interim basis while the city recruits for a permanent appointment. It is anticipated Ms. Johnson will start in the Interim Finance Director position on December 22, 2025. This is when it is estimated Ms. Green will exhaust her 960 fiscal hours per CalPERS guidelines.

Gov. Code section 21221(h) permits the limited-term appointment of CalPERS retirees to temporary positions subject to certain requirements, including limited hours, compensation, and duration of work.

As a CalPERS retiree, Ms. Johnson can only work an aggregate of 960 hours in a fiscal year regardless of how many CalPERS contracting agencies she works for during such period.

Staff recommends that the City Council approve by Minute Order the limited-term appointment of Bonnie Johnson as Interim Finance Director, while the city recruits for a permanent appointment.

JUSTIFICATION:

The resolution for Interim Vacant Retired Annuitant under Gov. Code sections 7522.56 and 21221(h), is for CalPERS retirees hired to work in a vacant position while the employer recruits for a permanent replacement, such as an interim city manager, interim police or fire chief, interim department head, or 862
any other unique managerial or executive position. An open recruitment to fill the vacancy with a permanent replacement is required to appoint a retiree. A retiree can only be appointed once to a vacant position. A retiree must reinstate from retirement to be employed in any regular staff position which includes any permanent positions including full time, part time, seasonal, limited term, permanent intermittent, exempt from membership, or any other type of temporary or periodic regular staff position.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Ms. Johnson would be paid an hourly rate of $117.3024 per hour, which is the hourly equivalent of the Finance Director position. She is not entitled to any additional compensation, benefits, vacation, or holidays.

ALTERNATIVES:

Do not adopt Resolution No. 2025-175 and provide staff alternate direction, which will lead to further shortages in the Finance Department.

BUDGETED?:

Yes
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT:

No
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 2025-175.docx

2. Johnson, Bonnie_Final Offer of Employment_12.19.2025.doc 863
Resolution 2025-175

Page 1 of 4 ends

RESOLUTION 2025-175

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXCEPTION OF THE 180-DAY WAITING PERIOD FOR RETIRED ANNUITANT (RA), GOV. CODE SECTIONS 7522.56 & 21221(H)
WHEREAS, in compliance with Government (Gov.) Code section 7522.56 of the Public Employees’ Retirement Law, the [governing body name] must provide CalPERS this certification resolution when hiring a retiree before 180 days has passed since their retirement date; and WHEREAS, Bonnie Johnson, 2114 retired from City of Calimesa in the position of Executive Advisor to the City Manager, effective 06/30/2023; and WHEREAS, Gov. Code section 7522.56 requires that post-retirement employment commence no earlier than 180 days after the retirement date, which is 07/01/2023 without this certification resolution; and
WHEREAS, Gov. Code section 7522.56 provides that this exception to the 180-day wait period shall not apply if the retiree accepts any retirement-related incentive; and WHEREAS, the Banning City Council, the City of Banning and Bonnie Johnson certify that Bonnie Johnson has not and will not receive a Golden Handshake or any other retirement-related incentive; and
WHEREAS, an appointment under Gov. Code section 21221(h) requires the retiree is appointed into the interim appointment during recruitment for a permanent appointment; and.

WHEREAS, the governing body has authorized the search for a permanent appointment on [date]; and
WHEREAS, the Banning City Council hereby appoints Bonnie Johnson as an interim appointment retired annuitant to the vacant position of Finance Director for the City of Banning under Gov. Code section 21221(h), effective [date of appointment]; and.

WHEREAS, this Gov. Code section 21221(h) appointment shall only be made once and therefore will end on September 30, 2026; and.

WHEREAS, the entire employment agreement, contract or appointment document between Bonnie Johnson and the City of Banning has been reviewed by this body and is attached herein; and
WHEREAS, no matters, issues, terms or conditions related to this employment and appointment have been or will be placed on a consent calendar; and WHEREAS, the employment shall be limited to 960 hours per fiscal year for all CalPERS employers; and
WHEREAS, the compensation paid to retirees cannot be less than the minimum nor exceed the maximum monthly base salary paid to other employees performing comparable duties, divided by 173.333 to equal the hourly rate; and 864
Resolution 2025-175

Page 2 of 4 ends

WHEREAS, the maximum base salary for this position is $9,384.19 and the hourly equivalent is $117.3024, and the minimum base salary for this position is $6,936.47 and the hourly equivalent is $86.7058; and
WHEREAS, the hourly rate paid to Bonnie Johnson will be $117.3024; and WHEREAS, Bonnie Johnson has not and will not receive any other benefit, incentive, compensation in lieu of benefit or other form of compensation in addition to this hourly pay rate.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby certifies the nature of the employment of Bonnie Johnson as described herein and detailed in the attached employment agreement document and that this appointment is necessary to fill the critically needed position of Finance Director for the City of Banning by December 19, 2025 because the current Interim Finance Director, whom is also a retired annuitant is close to exhausting her CalPERS fiscal year limit of 960 hours and the need for management level support continues to exist while the Finance Director recruitment remains open.

SECTION 2. The City Council authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to make necessary budget adjustments, appropriations, and transfers related to this resolution.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of December 2025.

Mayor
City of Banning
ATTEST:

Sandra Calderon, Acting Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

John Pinkey, City Attorney
SBEMP
865
Resolution 2025-175

Page 3 of 4 ends

CERTIFICATION:

I, Sandra Calderon, Acting Deputy City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2025-175, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 9th day of December 2025 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Sandra Calderon, Acting Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning, California
866
Resolution 2025-175

Page 4 of 4 ends

Exhibit A
Letter of Employment - Bonnie Johnson
867
City of Banning
Human Resources and Risk Management
99 E. Ramsey Street • P.O. Box 998 • Banning, CA 92220-0998 • (951) 922-3155 or 3173 December 19, 2025
Subject: Final Offer of Employment – Interim Finance Director (Retired Annuitant) Ms. Bonnie Johnson,
CalPERS allows retirees receiving a pension to return to work in a limited capacity as a Retired Annuitant. A retired annuitant is a CalPERS retiree, who works as an at-will employee of a CalPERS employer, with certain restrictions to avoid jeopardizing their retirement pension payments. Under Gov. Code section 21221, subdivision (h) (hereinafter “Gov. Code section 21221(h)”), a contracting agency is permitted to use a Retired Annuitant to fill a vacant position on an interim basis while recruiting for a permanent appointment. This appointment is being made as an emergency appointment to prevent a stoppage of public business.

Below is the position and pay information for this special assignment, as well as further rules and requirements for working as a retired annuitant.

Position: Retired Annuitant – Interim Finance Director
Salary Grade: D106, Step 12
Salary Range: $117.3024/hr.

Start Date: December 19, 2025
Maximum Hours: No more than 30 hours per week
Report to: Art Vela, Interim City Manager
This position is an at-will, temporary position until tentative September 2026.

As a retired annuitant:
 You do not accrue service credit or any additional retirement benefits from employment.  You must have a Limited-Duration work period. You may not exceed 960 hours in a fiscal year (July 1 through June 30) for employment with all CalPERS employers combined. There are no exceptions to this limit. Your hours will reset each July 1st and you can work another 960 hours for the new fiscal year. Your employment should terminate when the limitedduration work you were hired to perform is completed.  You cannot be employed in any regular staff position such as “seasonal”, “permanent intermittent” or any other “temporary” position other than a retired annuitant position.  You also cannot receive any benefit, incentive, compensation in lieu of benefits, or other form of compensation in addition to the hourly pay rate. For example, longevity compensation, sick leave or vacation benefits cannot be provided to a retired annuitant.  You cannot be appointed as a retired annuitant if you received unemployment insurance payments for prior retired annuitant work for any CalPERS employer within 12 months prior to 868
99 E. Ramsey Street • P.O. Box 998 • Banning, CA 92220-0998 • (951) 922-3155 or 3173 your appointment date. Upon accepting employment, you must certify in writing to the employer that you comply with this requirement.

We are excited to welcome you back to the City of Banning. We do require your signature to indicate your acknowledgement of the retired annuitant requirements. Please feel free to contact Nicole Jews via email at [email protected] or by telephone at (951) 922-3155 with any questions.

Sincerely,
Nicole Jews
Human Resources & Risk Manager
Art Vela
Interim City Manager
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE CONTENTS OF THIS LETTER AND ACCEPT THIS POSITION WITH THE STIPULATIONS CONTAINED HEREIN.
_____________________________________________
Name (please print)
______________________________ ________________________ Signature Date
869

Banning City CouncilDecember 9, 2025

Banning City Council
December 9, 2025