Cities Index.
Agenda packet, regular meeting

Banning City Council
March 24, 2026

Document
Agenda packet, regular meeting
Meeting
March 24, 2026
Body
Banning City Council
Pages
16
Original file
200.9 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on d3n9y02raazwpg.cloudfront.net. That file is the official record.

645
WHEREAS, Amendment No .3 will amend the Profess ional Services Agreement by adding an additional $ 57 ,080 to cover Change Order No.5 ; and WHEREAS, an appropriation from the Measure A Fund in the amount of $ 57 ,080 to Account No. 101- 4900- 431 .93- 16 is necessary to cover the change orders ; and WHEREAS, the project is funded by the TUMF prog ram up to $ 1 ,000 ,000 , therefore the additional expenditure related to Amendment No . 2 will be partially reimbursed by the TUMF program, which has a current balance of $ 189 ,605. 41 ; and WHEREAS, the City intends to request additional TUMF funding in the amount of 400 ,000 including contingency .

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council approves Amendment No . 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates , Inc . for an additional $ 57 ,080 for the Design of Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension.

SECTION 2. City Council authorizes the City Manager or designee to make necessary budget adjustments , appropriations and transfers related to Amendment No . 4 to the Profess ional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates , Inc. for the Design of Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension .

SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adopt ion of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolut ions .

PASSED , APPROVED AND ADOPTED th is 27 th day of May 2025 .

ATTEST:

Caroline Patton , Admini
City of Banning
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Resolution 2025- 70

Page 2 of 4 ends

SheriF! ynr{ a'y
City of Banning
646
CERTIFICATION:

I, Caroline Patton , Administrative City Clerk of the City of Banning , California , do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolut ion 2025- 70 , was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California , at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27th day of May 2025 by the following vote , to wit:

AYES : Barrington , Flynn , Miller, Royce , Wallace .

NOES :

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Resolution 2025- 70

Page 3 of 4 ends

Caroline Patton, Administ
City of Banning , California
647

EXHIBIT A
Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with WEBB Resolution 2025- 70

Page 4 of 4 ends

648
AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
C00660) FOR THE DESIGN OF SUN LAKES BOULEVARD

EXTENSION BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF BANNING AND ALBERT
A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES (" Amendment No. 4") by and between the CITY OF BANNING (" City") and ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES, a California Corporation Consultant") is effective as of this day: _____ _

RECITALS
A. City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement for Professional Design Services dated June 23, 2020 (" Agreement") whereby Consultant agreed to provide Design Services for the Design of Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension following a Request for Proposals for an amount not to exceed Five-Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Four Hundred Sixteen Dollars and Five Cents ($ 548,416.05). The agreement included a 10% Contingency ofFifty-Four Thousand Eight Hundred Forty One Dollars and Sixty-One Cents ($ 54,841.61) for a total contract amount of Six Hundred Three Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty- Five Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($ 603,725.66). The Term of the Agreement was to commence on June 23, 2020, and continue in full force and effect until October 3, 2022.

B. On February 11, 2022, Public Works Department approved a change order to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for out-ofscope work including coordination with Westem Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority ( RCA) in the amount of $24,983.25, leaving a contingency balance of $29,858.36.

C. On March 21, 2022, Public Works Department approved a change order to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for the preparation of a sediment transport analysis ( out of scope) in the amount of $5,974.88, leaving a contingency balance of $23,883.48.

D. On August 23,2022 City Council adopted City Council Resolution 2022-106 which authorized the increase in compensation for services provided under the Agreement by One Hundred Twenty- Nine Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($ 129,400.00).

E. On October 11, 2022, City Council Adopted City Council Resolution 2022- 139 to rescind Resolution 2022- 106 and amend the Agreement to include additional compensation in the amount of One Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Two Hundred Twenty- Two Dollars ($ 148,222.00) for a new contract total of Seven Hundred FiftyOne Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-Seven Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($ 751,947.66) and to extend the term of the Agreement through June 30, 2024.

F. On October 23, 2023, City and Consultant amended the Agreement to modify the Scope of Services, extend the Term of the Agreement to June 30, 2025, and increase the Contract Sum by Four Hundred Ninety-Six Thousand Seventy- Nine Dollars 649
496,079.00) for a total not to exceed amount ofOne Million Two Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Twenty- Six Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($ 1,248,026.66).

G. On January 6, 2025, City and Consultant amended the Agreement to extend the Term ofthe Agreement to June 30, 2026.

H. City and Consultant now desire to amend the Agreement to modify the Scope of Services, and increase the Contract Sum to One Million Three Hundred Five Thousand One Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty-six Cents. ($ 1,305,106.66).

The Parties therefore agree follows:

1. Amended Terms. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

1.1 The Scope of Services as set forth in Section 1.1 of and Exhibit A to the Agreement is hereby amended to include the Services set forth in Attachment l ", attached hereto and incorporated herein.

1.2 The maximum compensation for the Services performed pursuant to this Amendment No. 4 shall not exceed Fifty-Seven Thousand Eighty Dollars 57,080.00) thereby increasing the Contract Sum, as set forth in Section 2.1 of the Agreement, to One Million Three Hundred Five Thousand One Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty-six Cents. ($ 1,305, 106..66).

Miscellaneous Provisions

2.1 Continued Effect ofAgreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 43, all provisions ofthe Agreement, as amended by Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 4, whenever the term " Agreement" appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement, as amended by Amendment Nos. 1 through 4. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of this Amendment No. 4 and the provisions ofthe Agreement or Amendments No. 1 through 4, the provisions ofthis Amendment No. 4 shall control.

2.2 Consideration for Amendment. The parties hereby agree that they have each received adequate and independent consideration for the modifications to the Agreement set forth in this Amendment No. 4.

2.3 Authority. The persons executing this Amendment No. 4 on behalf ofthe parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Amendment No. 4 on behalf of said party, iii) by so executing this Amendment No. 4, such party is formally bound to the provisions ofthis Amendment No. 4, and (iv) entering into this Amendment No. 650
4 does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which said party is bound.

1.3 Counterparts. This Amendment No. 4 may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be an original, but all of which together will constitute one instrument.

1.4 Electronic Signatures. Each Party may adopt as its signature an electronic identification consisting of a symbol or code that is affixed to or contained in each document transmitted by such Party (" electronic signature"). The Parties hereto herby agree that electronic signatures are acceptable, shall have the same force and effect under the law as original wet signatures, and shall be sufficient to verify that the Parties have executed this Agreement and such other documents transmitted by the Parties.

SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
651
The Parties are signing this Amendment No. 4 the date stated in the introductory clause.

CITY OF BANNING
Douglas Schulze,
City Manager
City Council Approval: ~n/_a ____ _
ATTEST:

Caroline Patton
Administrative City Clerk

CONSULTANT
NAME:

TITLE:

NAME:

TITLE:

NOTE: PROOF OF AUTHORITY TO BIND CONTRACTING PARTY REQUIRED.

APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE

BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT' S BUSINESS ENTITY.
652
ATTACHMENT " 1"
653
A L B E R T A.

WEBB

A S S O C I A T E S
Patrick Safari, GIP Manager
City of Banning
99 E. Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220
Sent via email: psafari@banninqca . gov
2020- 0126
February 28, 2025
Revised April 23, 2025
RE: Proposal for Contract Amendment No. 4 - Additional Environmental Services for Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project ( PSA C00660)
Dear Patrick,
Pursuant to your request on February 6, 2025, and subsequent discussion on April 2, 2025, Albert A.

WEBB Associates ( WEBB) is pleased to provide you with this proposal for additional services for the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project. WEBB is currently under contract with the City to obtain regulatory permits for the project from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife ( CDFW) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board ( RWQCB).

Said permits have requirements that the City will need to fulfill prior to construction of the project which are outlined below in Task 1. Biological reporting and monitoring that is required during construction are not included herein, but as we have discussed with you, we understand the City will include the permitting- related tasks during construction to be included in the City' s forthcoming construction management contract.

Also included in this request is the City' s obligation for compensatory mitigation related to impacts to jurisdictional waters which are required to be fulfilled within 18 months of impacts. Task 2 includes WEBB' s assistance with the compensatory mitigation obligations. 3788 McCray Street, Riverside, CA 925061 P:951.686.1070 IF:951.788.1256I www.webbassociates. com 654
Scope of Work
Task 1: Biological Services During Construction
WO: 2020-0126
City of Banning
The Tasks below are related to the surveying and reporting requirements of the CDFW permit, RWQCB permit, as well as CEQA mitigation measures MM BIO- 1 through MM BIO- 4. 1 WEBB will subcontract with Osprey Environmental Associates ( Osprey) to fulfill these requirements.

Preconstruction Nesting Bird Survey and Report (corresponds to CDFW Measures 2.11.1 and 4.4; CEQA MM BI0-1)
Osprey will conduct preconstruction nesting bird surveys if vegetation clearance occurs outside the recommended window ( September 1 - February 1). Surveys will be performed within three ( 3) days prior to construction initiation to identify active nests within 100 feet of the project site. A survey report by a qualified biologist verifying nest status will be submitted to the City of Banning prior to construction. If active nests are identified, species- specific measures will be implemented to prevent nest abandonment.

Burrowing Owl Pre-Construction Inspection Survey and Report ( corresponds to CDFW Measure 2.12.4 and CEQA MM BI0-2)
A single preconstruction burrowing owl survey will be conducted within 3 days of vegetation removal or ground disturbance. The survey will comply with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan ( MSHCP) and 2006 " Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions" and will cover entire the project site and within 150- meters. If burrowing owls are detected during the breeding season ( February 1-August 31), a 300- foot buffer will be enforced around active burrows until nesting is complete. Following the survey, a burrowing owl pre- construction survey report will be prepared and submitted to WEBB in PDF format. The survey report will document the methods, results , and conclusion of the survey.

Crotch's Bumble Bee (corresponds to CEQA MM BI0-3)
Crotch's Bumble Bee Habitat Mapping and Report (corresponds to CDFW Measure 2.14) Osprey will conduct habitat mapping for the Crotch' s bumblebee within the project footprint.

Mapping will identify habitat alliances following Sawyer et al. ( 2009). Following field mapping and no less than 120 days prior to the initiation of activities Osprey will complete and submit to CDFW a baseline habitat mapping report. The report will identify species composition for each mapped alliance and will be submitted to CDFW.

Crotch's Bumble Bee Draft Survey Plan (corresponds to CDFW Measure 2.15.2) A qualified Osprey biologist will prepare and submit to CDFW for review and comment a draft survey plan for Crotch' s bumble bee. The survey plan will identify the timing , number, and duration of survey efforts, and procedures to follow should Crotch' s bumble bee be detected within the project area. 1 There are a total of five mitigation measures for biological resources. MM BIO-5 is " Mitigation for Riparian/Riverine and Jurisdictional Impacts." WEBB 's assistance with this is in Task 2 , herein. 655
WO: 2020-0126
City of Banning
The survey plan will be submitted no less than 90 days prior to initiation of project activities in suitable habitat.

Crotch' s Bumble Bee Survey{ s) and Report { corresponds to CDFW Measure 2.15.3) If habitat mapping identifies the presence of plants ( e.g., genera Antirrhinum, Phacelia, Clarkia, Cordylanthus, Dendromecon, Eschscholzia, Eriogonum, Hypericum, Lantana, Lupinus, Salvia, Asc/epias, Cirsium, Monardel/a, Keckiel/a, Acmispon, Euthamia, Ehrendorferia, Vicia, and/or Trichostema) or other suitable habitat ( i.e. nesting, foraging, and overwintering habitat), Osprey will conduct focused surveys for the Crotch' s bumblebee ( CBB) following the approval and submittal of survey plan. Osprey will first conduct a literature review and records search for CBB occurrences within a 10- mile radius, utilizing the CDFW California Natural Diversity Database and iNaturalist.

Following the literature review, Osprey will conduct on- site CBB surveys following the Survey Considerations for California Endangered Species Act Candidate Bumble Bee Species ( CDFW 2023). These surveys will take place during the Colony Active Period { April- August) and when floral resources are available, ideally at peak bloom. A minimum of three surveys will be conducted, spaced 2-4 weeks apart between April and August. Surveys will be performed during daylight, beginning at least one hour after sunrise and ending at least two hours before sunset, ideally between 9:00 AM and 1 :00 PM, with temperatures between 65°F and 90°F and wind speeds under 8 miles per hour. Each survey will cover at least one person- hour of search effort per three acres of suitable habitat.

Following the completion of the surveys, a report will be prepared summarizing the survey methods, findings, and conclusions. The report will also include a list of bee species observed and any accompanying photographs. Survey results will be submitted to CDFW before ground- disturbing activities begin. If an active CBB nest is detected, a no- disturbance buffer zone will be established, and CDFW will be notified.

Biological Worker' s Environmental Awareness Program ( WEAP) and Invasive Species Education Program { corresponds to CDFW Measures 2.8 and 2.8.1; CEQA MM BI0- 4) Osprey will develop and conduct a mandatory Biological Worker' s Environmental Awareness Program { WEAP) training for all construction personnel. This training will cover key topics, including CBB, burrowing owls, rare plant species, and riparian/ riverine features. WEAP training will be coordinated with the paleontological WEAP. A recorded training will be prepared and available.

Further, included in the WEAP will be an additional discussion of the invasive species currently present within the project site as well as those that may pose a threat to or have the potential to invade the Project site. The discussion will include a physical description of each species and information regarding their habitat preferences, local and statewide distribution, modes of dispersal, and impacts. The invasive species education program will also include a discussion of Best Management Practices { BMPs) to be implemented at the Project site to avoid the introduction and spread of invasive species into and out of the Project site. 656
WO: 2020-0126
City of Banning
WEBB Management of Biological Services
WEBB has budgeted 40 hours to manage and coordinate with Osprey related to Task 1 including reviewing documents, and meeting with the City.

UAV (Drone) Survey(s) (Optional)
Osprey can provide a drone survey of the project area to generate a high-resolution orthomosaic basemap , offering a temporally and spatially accurate depiction of the project site as is currently prior to construction and post-construction. This updated imagery can serve as a key reference for stakeholders, ensuring precise visualization of project lands, roads, and planned or constructed infrastructure. The orthomosaic will enhance project planning, coordination, and decision-making by delivering highly accurate spatial and visual data. The flight will be conducted by an Osprey FAA-licensed Remote Pilot in Command (RPIC) and a visual observer, ensuring full compliance with FAA regulations. The drone data collection and subsequent GIS analysis will be used to support all of Osprey's reporting deliverables included herein. Deliverables will include a high-resolution orthomosaic base map, digital terrain model depicting project ground elevations , and a digital surface model depicting project surface elevations.

Although a temporally and spatially accurate orthomosaic basemap is informative and helpful, this optional service is not required in order to complete any of the aforementioned tasks.

Task 1 Assumptions
None of the species identified above will be found on site.

This scope includes one (1) in-person WEAP training. Any additional training sessions will require a separate scope and fee.

Materials required for delineating Environmentally Sensitive Areas ( ESAs) or establishing nesting buffers are not included in this proposal. The cost of these materials will be billed directly to the client if not provided by the City.

The preparation of a Burrowing Owl Mitigation Plan is not included. If required, Osprey will provide a separate scope and fee for this task.

This proposal does not cover small mammal trapping or the preparation of a small mammal trapping survey report. If required , Osprey will provide an additional scope and fee for these efforts.

Assistance with securing an Incidental Take Permit ( ITP) from CDFW is not included. If required, Osprey can provide a separate scope and fee for this task.

Task 2: WEBB Assistance with Offsite Compensatory Mitigation Fulfillment corresponds to CDFW Measure 3.3; CEQA MM BI0-5)
WEBB has included 50 hours to help the City to set up its compensatory mitigation obligation utilizing an offsite mitigation site owned by the City located southeast of the City's wastewater treatment plant. We anticipate actions under this task will be to advise and support the City related to: finding a third party to hold a conservation easement/deed restriction(s) on the City's property (City to retain 657
WO: 2020-0126
City of Banning
fee title), negotiate and find the City a th ird party land manager and assist City with said agreement , and finding an entity to provide a non- wasting endowment. We understand the City will take lead on each of these tasks; therefore this budget is for things like attending meetings to provide project background and making connections to facilitate the process.

Budget
Our proposed budget for the services listed herein will be billed on a Time and Materials basis according to our existing contract for a total not to exceed of $57,080.

Environmental Services
Task 1 - Biological Services
Preconstruction Nesting Bird Survey and Report $ 4,660
Burrowing Owl Pre-Construction Inspection Survey and Report $ 6 ,230 Crotch 's Bumble Bee Habitat Mapping and Report $ 6 ,840 Crotch 's Bumble Bee Draft Survey Plan $ 4,350
Crotch's Bumble Bee Survey(s) and Report $ 14 ,380
WEBB Management of Task 1 (40 hours) $ 7,150
Optional UAV (Drone) Survey $ 4 ,370
Task 2 - Management and Coordination for Offsite Mitigation $ 9 ,100 TOTAL $ 57, 080
The following is a summary of original, current, and proposed authorizations according to our records.

WEBB Original Authorization: $
548,416.05 plus $54 ,841.61 contingency
for total of $603 ,725.66
Chanqe Order No. 1 $ 24 ,983.25 (subtracted from continqency) Chanqe Order No. 2 $ 5,974.88 (subtracted from continqency) City Council Resolution 2022-106 $ 129,400 (rescinded)
City Council Resolution 2022-139 $ 148 ,222
Change Order No . 3 $ 496,079
Current Authorization $ 1,248 ,026.66
Proposed Change Order $ 57,080
Total WEBB Authorization with Proposed $
1 ,305 ,106.66
Change Order
658
WO : 2020- 0126
City of Banning
If you find this request acceptable , please issue a contract amendment to our office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to the City and look forward to hearing from you. If you have any questions regarding this proposal , please call me at ( 951 ) 830- 4305.

Sincerely ,
ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
Dilesh Sheth, PE, TE
Senior Vice President
Dilesh. Sheth@webbassociates. com
Copy: Stephanie Standerfer
Autumn Dewoody
659
WO: 2020-0126
City of Banning

Page 16 ends

660
MsoCalGas
A ~ Sempra Energy utility"
March 27 , 2025
VIA Electronic Mail
Marisol Lopez
Economic Development Manager
City of Banning
99 E . Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220
Alana Edwards
Sr. Land Specialist
Land & Ri ght- of- Way
8101 Rosemead Blvd. SC722K
Pi co Rivera, CA 90660
Ph : ( 213) 671 -2089
Aedwa rdl@SoCalGa s.com
RE: Southern California Gas Company' s Line 2000 CLC MP 139.36 -139.44 Replacement Project - Offer Letter: Temporary Right ofEntry Agreement (TRE) Location: APN: 532-130 -012
Dear Ms_ Lopez,
Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas ®) operates and maintains an existing pipeline and related facilities known as Line 2000, which is located on property owned by the City of Banning. SoCalGas holds the right-of-way easement recorded in Book 873, Page 234, on October 24 , 1947, at the County Recorder's Office of Riverside County. We are proposing to replace approximately 400 feet ofthis pipeline to ensure continued service reliability for our customers. As part ofthis project, SoCalGas requires a temporary right of entry agreement for your property, identified as APN: 532 -130-012, located in Riverside County.

SoCalGas is requesting 50 ,762 square feet of temporary workspace/ laydown yard , as described in the enclosed Temporary Right ofEntry Agreement (TRE) and depicted in the enclosed Exhibit A related to the Property identified as APN 532 -130-012. We are offering compensation ofNine Thousand Dollars ($9,000.00) for the TRE , payable upon receipt of the executed agreement. This arrangement is for a period ofthree months.

After review and acceptance by the City ofBanning' s Council Board, please execute the enclosed TRE and return the original signed document. Payment will be processed for the amount once the TRE is executed.
661

Page 2 ends

Ifyou have any questions regarding this offer or the project, please feel free to contact me at 562 388-3220 or via email at AEdwardl@SoCalGas. com.

Sincerely,

0. t,
Let me know ifyou need any further changes!
Alana Edwards
Southern California Gas
Enclosures:

Temporary Right of Entry Agreement w/Exhibit A
662

TEMPORARY RIGHT OF ENTRY AGREEMENT

FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
This Temporary Right of Entry Agreement (" Agreement") is dated as of this _ day of __ 2025 and is made by and between Southern California Gas Company (" SoCalGas"), a California corporation, and the City of Banning, a California Corporation, (" Owner"), the legal owner of the property identified herein.

The property owner is the legal owner of that certain real property located in the City of Banning, County of Riverside, California, more specifically identified as A.P.N. 532-130-012 ( the " Property").

Easement- SoCalGas is the owner of that certain right- of-way recorded as Book No. 873 Page 234 on October 24, 1947, in the County Recorder' s Office of Riverside County, California, which covers a portion of the Property and pursuant to which SoCalGas installed a 30-inch pipeline and appurtenances under a portion of the Property.

Temporary Workspace and Work- SoCalGas request the right to fabricate any and all related above and below- ground pipes, valves, fences, and appurtenances and the right to bring and store temporarily any and all necessary vehicles, materials, and other construction equipment and stockpile on the Temporary Workspace, as defined below ( all of which is hereafter referred to as Work"). As a condition to the Temporary Workspace Owner requested that the FAA notification be completed by SoCalGas. SoCalGas made such notification on March 6, 2025, SoCalGas requests the right to perform the Work within an area of approximately 50,762 square feet as shown on the attached map. This area is referred to hereafter ( individually and collectively) as " Temporary Workspace." See the Exhibit A map attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

Owner' s Consent- Owner grants SoCalGas ( including its subcontractors) permission to enter and use the Temporary Workspace for purposes of performing the Work. Work may be conducted by SoCa/ Gas or by its subcontractors during the hours of 7:00 am to 5:00 pm from Monday through Saturday. If any conflict arises between Work and any other uses of the Property, then SoCalGas and the Owner shall work together diligently and in good faith to resolve any such conflicts.

Payment and Time Period- After SoCalGas has received the Owner' s executed Agreement, and the completed IRS W-9 form and CA Form 590 or CA Form 587, SoCalGas shall pay Owner a total of 9,000. 00 for the Basic Term of the Agreement, which payment shall be sent by SoCalGas' accounting department. SoCalGas ( including its subcontractors) shall have access to and use of the Temporary Workspace for approximately Three months, tentatively arranged to start on or about September 22, 2025, to on or about November 22, 2025 (" Basic Term"). SoCalGas may postpone the start date of the Basic Term, in which case SoCalGas will notify the Owner in advance. In the unlikely event SoCalGas needs extra time on the Temporary Workspace, Owner agrees that SoCalGas may have additional monthly periods for the sum of $ 3,000.00 per month ( or portion thereof), not to exceed six months.

TRE Reviewed by Legal Dept. Andrew Cheung 12/31/2009 Page 1 of 3 663
Restoration- At the completion of the Work, SoCalGas ( including through its subcontractors) will restore the Temporary Workspace to as near to its original condition and appearance as is reasonably possible.

Indemnification- SoCalGas will indemnify the Owner for any liability arising out of SoCalGas' ( or its subcontractor' s) Work or use of the Temporary Workspace, except to the extent such liability is due to the Owner' s negligence or willful misconduct.

Entire Agreement- This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties relating to the Work and SoCalGas' entry onto the Property. Any prior agreements, promises, negotiations, or representations not expressly set forth herein are of no force and effect.

Authority- Each person executing this Agreement hereby represents and warrants ( i) their authority to do so and ( ii) that such authority has been duly and validly conferred.

Severability- lf any term or provision of this Agreement shall, to any extent, be held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected and shall remain in full force and effect.

No Waiver- A waiver or a breach of a covenant or provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any other covenant or provision in this Agreement and no waiver shall be valid unless in writing and executed by the waiving party.

Governing Law-This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

Recordation- This Agreement shall not be recorded. However, the Owner agrees that upon any transfer of title involving the Property during the period of the Agreement, the Owner shall give written notice of the Agreement to the new owner or transferee and written notice of the transfer to SoCalGas to the address below.

Counterparts- This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original of this Agreement and all of which, when taken together, will be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement. The exchange of copies of this Agreement and of signature pages by facsimile transmission or by other electronic means shall constitute effective execution and delivery of this Agreement as to the parties and may be used in lieu of the original Agreement for all purposes.

Electronic Signatures- Each of the parties ( i) has agreed to permit the use of electronic signatures in order to expedite the execution of this Agreement, ( ii) intends to be bound by its respective electronic signatures, ( iii) is aware that the other will rely on such electronically transmitted signature, and ( iv) acknowledges such reliance and waives any defenses to the enforcement of this Agreement based on the fact that a signature was sent by electronic transmission only.

REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK- SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] TRE Reviewed by Legal Dept. Andrew Cheung 12/31/2009 Page 2 of 3 664
The parties have read this Agreement, understand it, and agree to be bound by its terms as of the date first set forth above.

Southern California Gas Company
Artemis G. Manos
Land and Right of Way Supervisor
For Southern California Gas Company
8101 Rosemead Blvd., SC722K
Pico Rivera, California 90660- 5100
TRE Reviewed by Legal Dept. Andrew Cheung 12/31/2009
City of Banning
Robert Fisher
Acting City Manager

Page 3 of 3 ends

665
LEGEND
rz2I BAKER TANK

WORKSPACE ( OUTSIOE EASEMENT)

WORKSPACE ( INSIOE EASEMENT )

IAYOOWN YARD

ACCESS ROAD

ACCESS ROAD (REQUIRING VEGETATION CLEARANCE)
EASEMENT 16.5'

PARCEL LINE

SECTION LINE / PLSS LIMITS

BY DATE
DESIGNED : R. MATTHEWS 03111 125
DRAWN : S MOLDENHAUER 03/ 11 125
MsoCalGas. CHECKED : R. MATTHEWS 03/11 125
APPROVED : B. SANDOVAL 03/ 11 125
CLASS : DIST: SCALE : 1"• 150'
150 75 0 150
140 '±

CITY OF

BANNING

ACCESS ROAD
APN
532- 130- 012 38, 689
ACCESS ROAD ( REQUIRING VEGETATION CLEARANCE) 532- 130- 012 6,397 03111 125
DATE

BAKER TANK

LAYDOWN YARD

WORKSPACE ( INSIDE EASEMENT)

WORKSPACE ( OUTSIDE EASEMENT)

SJM JRM BLS ISSUED FOR INFORMATION

BY CHK APV
APN : 532-130-012
OWNER : CITY OF BANNING
L2000 CLC MP 139 .36-139.44 REPLACEMENT
532- 130- 012 500
532- 130- 012 18, 431
532- 130- 012 8, 498
532- 130- 012 25, 934

DESCRIPTION

DRAWING NUMBER
8788- EX- 203

EXHIBIT A

0.888

0.147

0.011

0.423

0.195

0.595
REV
A
666
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (C00660)

FOR THE DESIGN OF SUN LAKES BOULEVARD EXTENSION BY AND
BETWEEN THE CITY OF BANNING AND ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL
DESIGN SERVICES (“Amendment No. 1”) by and between the CITY OF BANNING (“City”) and ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES, a California Corporation (“Consultant”) is effective as of this day: _______________________.

RECITALS
A. City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement for Professional Design Services dated June 23, 2020 (“Agreement”) whereby Consultant agreed to provide Design Services for the Design of Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension following a Request for Proposals for an amount not to exceed Five-Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Four Hundred Sixteen Dollars and Five Cents ($548,416.05). The agreement included a 10% Contingency of Fifty Four Thousand Eight Hundred Forty One Dollars and Sixty One Cents ($54,841.61) for a total contract amount of Six Hundred Three Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty Five Dollars and Sixty Six Cents ($603,725.66) The Term of the Agreement was to commence on June 23, 2020, and continue in full force and effect until October 3, 2022.

B. On February 11, 2022, Public Works Department approved a change order to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for out-of-scope work including coordination with Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) in the amount of $24,983.25, leaving a contingency balance of $29,858.36.

C. On March 21, 2022, Public Works Department approved a change order to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for the preparation of a sediment transport analysis (out of scope) in the amount of $5,974.88, leaving a contingency balance of $23,883.48.

D. On August 23,2022 City Council adopted City Council Resolution 2022-106 which authorized the increase in compensation for services provided under the Agreement by One Hundred Twenty-Nine Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($129,400).

E. On October 11, 2022, City Council Adopted City Council Resolution 2022-139 to rescind Resolution 2022-106 and amend the Agreement to include additional compensation in the amount of One Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Two Hundred Twenty-Two Dollars ($148,222.00) for a new contract total of Seven Hundred Fifty-One Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-Seven Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($751,947.66) and to extend the term of the Agreement through June 30, 2024.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 November 8, 2022
667
TERMS

1. Contract Changes. The Agreement is amended as provided herein. (a) Section 2.1 – “Contract Sum” of the Agreement is amended to provide that Consultant’s total compensation shall not to exceed Seven Hundred Fifty-One Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-Seven Dollars and Sixty Six Cents ($751,947.66). (b) Section 3.4 – “Term” of the Agreement is hereby amended to extend the Agreement term to June 30, 2024.

2. Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 1, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 1, whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement.

3. Affirmation of Agreement; Warranty Re Absence of Defaults. City and Consultant each ratify and reaffirm each and every one of the respective rights and obligations arising under the Agreement. Each party represents and warrants to the other that there have been no written or oral modifications to the Agreement other than as provided herein. Each party represents and warrants to the other that the Agreement is currently an effective, valid and binding obligation.

Consultant represents and warrants to City that, as of the date of this Amendment No. 1, City is not in default of any material term of the Agreement and that there have been no events that, with the passing of time or the giving of notice, or both, would constitute a material default under the Agreement.

City represents and warrants to Consultant that, as of the date of this Amendment No. 1, Consultant is not in default of any material term of the Agreement and that there have been no events that, with the passing of time or the giving of notice, or both, would constitute a material default under the Agreement.

4. Adequate Consideration. The parties hereto irrevocably stipulate and agree that they have each received adequate and independent consideration for the performance of the obligations they have undertaken pursuant to this Amendment No. 1.

5. Authority. The persons executing this Amendment No. 1 on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Amendment No. 1 on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Amendment No. 1, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) the entering into this Amendment No. 1 does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 668
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement the day and year first hereinabove written.

CITY OF BANNING CONSULTANT
Douglas Schulze, Date
City Manager
Dilesh Sheth Date
Vice President
NAME: Date
TITLE:

ATTEST:
95-1723730
Tax ID No.

Caroline Patton Date
Deputy City Clerk
Address:
3788 McCray Street
Riverside, CA 92506
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Richards, Watson & Gershon
City Council Approval: _____________
Serita R. Young Date
City Attorney
NOTE: PROOF OF AUTHORITY TO BIND CONTRACTING PARTY REQUIRED.

APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS,

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 10/19/2022
11/4/2022 October 11, 2022
11/7/2022
11/8/2022
669
RESOLUTION 2022-139

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $ 148,222 FOR THE DESIGN OF SUN LAKES BOULEVARD EXTENSION; EXTENDING THE TERM OF AGREEMENT TO JUNE 30, 2024; AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION 2022-106
WHEREAS, on April 14, 2020, under Resolution No. 2020-48, the City Council approved the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for the design of Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension in the amount of $548,416.05, and a 10% contingency for a total of $603,725.66; and
WHEREAS, on July 14, 2020, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-97, authorizing the City Manager to execute a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Reimbursement Agreement with Western Riverside Council of Government ( WRCOG) for up to $ 1,000,000 in TUMF funds for the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension project; and WHEREAS, on February 11, 2022, Public Works Department approved a change order to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for out-of-scope work including coordination with• Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority RCA in the amount of $24, 9873.25, paid from contingency funds; and
WHEREAS, on March 21, 2022, Public Works Department approved a change order to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for the preparation of sediment transport in the amount of $5,974.88, paid from contingency funds; and
WHEREAS, on May 12, 2022, Public Works Department approved a change order to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for additional out of scope work such as storm drain system design, environmental coordination with Wildlife Agencies and Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority ( RCA), supplemental environmental documentation and jurisdictional delineation and permitting in the amount of $148,222; and WHEREAS, Amendment No.1 will amend the purchase order by adding an additional $ 148,222; and
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 1 will also extend the term of the Agreement to June 30,2024;and
WHEREAS, an appropriation from the Measure A Fund in the amount of $148,222 to Account No. 101-4900-431.93-16 is necessary to cover the change orders; and Resolution 2022- 139

Page 1 of 3 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 670
WHEREAS, the project , including Amendment No . 1 is fully funded by the TUMF program up to $1 ,000 ,000.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows :

SECTION 1 . City Council hereby approves Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates , Inc. for an additional $ 148, 222 for the Design of Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension and extend the term of the agreement to June 30 , 2024.

SECTION 2. The City Manager or designee is authorized to make necessary budget adjustments, appropriations and transfers related to the Professional Services Agreement Amendment No. 1 with Albert A. Webb Associates , Inc.

SECTION 3. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute Amendment No . 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates , Inc.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of October 2022 .

ATTEST:

Caroline Patton , DeQiycitycierk
City of Banning

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL CONTENT:

Se~~
Richards, Watson & Gershon
Resolution 2022-139

Page 2 of 3 ends

City of Banning
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 671
CERTIFICATION:

I, Caroline Patton, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Banning, California , do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2022- 139 , was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California , at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11th day of October 2022 by the following vote , to wit:

AYES: Happe , Minjares, Sanchez , and Wallace .

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Resolution 2022-139

Page 3 of 3 ends

Caroline Patton, De City Clerk
City of Banning , Californ ia
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 672

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Douglas Schulze, City Manager

PREPARED BY: Art Vela, Director of Public Works
Patrick Safari, Associate Engineer
MEETING DATE: October 11, 2022
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution 2022-139, Approving Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A.

Webb Associates, Inc. for an Additional Amount of $148,222 for the Design of Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension; Extending the Term of Agreement to June 30, 2024; and Rescinding
Resolution 2022-106
RECOMMENDATION:

City Council adopt Resolution 2022-139:

1. Approving Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for an additional amount of $148,222 for the Design of Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension and extend the term of the agreement to June 30, 2024.

2. Authorizing the City Manager or his designee to make necessary budget adjustments, appropriations and transfers related to the Professional Services Agreement Amendment No. 1 with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc.

3. Authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc.

4. Rescinding Resolution 2022-106.

BACKGROUND:

On April 14, 2020, under Resolution No. 2020-48, the City Council approved the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for the design of Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension (“Project”) in the amount of $548,416.05 with a 10% contingency of $54,841.61, for a total of $603,725.66.

On July 14, 2020, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-97, authorizing the City Manager to execute a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Reimbursement Agreement with Western Riverside Council of Government (WRCOG) for up to $1,000,000 in TUMF funds for the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension project. The TUMF 21 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 673
Staff Report: Resolution 2022-139, Amendment 1 to Webb Agreement for Sun Lakes Blvd Design October 11, 2022

Page 2 of 3 ends

funding would fully fund the environmental documentation (CEQA) and the design of the Project.

On February 11, 2022, Public Works Department approved a change order to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for out-of-scope work including coordination with Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) in the amount of $24,983.25, leaving a contingency balance of $29,858.36.

On March 21, 2022, Public Works Department approved a change order to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for the preparation of a sediment transport analysis (out of scope) in the amount of $5,974.88, leaving a contingency balance of $23,883.48.

On May 12, 2022, Public Works Department approved a change order to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for additional out-of-scope work such as storm drain system design, environmental coordination with Wildlife Agencies and Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA), supplemental environmental documentation and jurisdictional delineation and permitting in the amount of $148,222. The change order increased the contract amount to $751,947.66.

JUSTIFICATION:

Throughout the design process and coordination with the various environmental regulatory agencies, several out-of-scope tasks were identified that were needed to be completed in order to continue progress on the Project leading to the change orders described in the background section of this report.

As a result of the extra work, Amendment No.1 will also extend the term of the Agreement to June 30, 2024.

FISCAL IMPACT:

An appropriation from the Measure A Fund in the amount of $148,222 to Account No. 101-4900-431.93-16 is necessary to cover the current change order $148,222 as described above. A contingency balance will remain equal to $23,883.48.

The project is fully funded by the TUMF program up to $1,000,000, therefore the additional expenditures related to Amendment No. 1 will be fully reimbursed by the TUMF program.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Approve Resolution 2022-139

2. Do not approve Resolution 2022-139 and provide alternative direction to staff. 22 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 674
Staff Report: Resolution 2022-139, Amendment 1 to Webb Agreement for Sun Lakes Blvd Design October 11, 2022

Page 3 of 3 ends

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 2022-139
https://banningca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/11549/Att-1-Resolution-2022-139

2. Approved Resolution 2020-48
https://banningca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/11550/Att-2-CC-Resolution-No-2020- 048

3. Approved Resolution 2020-97
https://banningca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/11551/Att-3-CC-Resolution-No-2020- 097

4. Professional Services Agreement with Webb
https://banningca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/11552/Att-4-Professional-ServicesAgreement-with-Webb

5. Amendment No.1 to the Webb Agreement
https://banningca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/11547/Att-5-Amendment-No-1

6. Change Orders
https://banningca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/11548/Att-6--Change-Orders Approved by:

Douglas Schulze
City Manager
23 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 675

CHANGE ORDER
Change Order No. 2
Purchase Order No. 030269
Date 1/ 25/022
Agreement Date 6/ 23/020
Sheet 1 of 2
Owner: CITY OF BANNING
Project: 2020- 04 Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension
Contractor: Albert A. Webb and Associates
The following changes are hereby made to the Contract Documents:

JUSTIFICATIONS:

Out of scope work. Sediment Transport Study was needed to assess the potential sediment transport capacity at the proposed arched culverts crossings.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 676

CHANGE TO CON TRACT PRICE
Original Contract Price
Contract Price adjusted by previous
Change Order( s)
Contract Price due to this Change Order will
be ( increased)
New Contract Price including this Change Order

CHANGE TO CONTRACT TIME
Contract Time will be ( increased) Date
for Completion of all Work

APPROVALS REQUIRED
548, 416. 05
573, 399.0
5, 974. 88
579, 374. 18
12/ 31/ 2022
Current
580
Working Days) (Date) •
To be effective, this order must be approved by the Owner, or as may otherwise be required by the Supplemental General Conditions.

Recommended by:

Approved by:
geti,„ Y -63 - Date: II o2h l
aozz
Date: 1 Z Z
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 677
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 678
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 679
RESOLUTION 2020- 97
ADOPT RESOLUTION 2020-97, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER

TO EXECUTE A TUMF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH WRCOG
FOR UP TO $ 1,000,000 IN TUMF FUNDS FOR THE SUN LAKES

BOULEVARD EXTENSION PROJECT
WHEREAS, Western Riverside Council of Government ( WRCOG) has developed and administers the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee ( TUMF) program, a regional fee program designed to provide transportation infrastructure to mitigate the impact of new growth in western Riverside County. The City of Banning is an active member in WRCOG; and
WHEREAS, as the program administrator, WRCOG allocates TUMF funds to a variety of agencies, including the Riverside County Transportation Commission ( RCTC), Riverside Transit Agency ( RTA), Western Riverside Regional Conservation Authority RCA) and western Riverside cities and Riverside County areas through applicable TUMF Zones; and
WHEREAS, the City of Banning is part of the Pass Zone along with the City of Calimesa, City of Beaumont and Riverside County ( District 5); and WHEREAS, the Pass Zone Transportation Improvement Program ( TIP), which included the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension project, was approved by the WRCOG Executive Committee at its May 4, 2020 meeting; and
WHEREAS, the TUMF Reimbursement Agreement will provide up to $ 1,000,000 in TUMF funds in the form of a reimbursement to the City of Banning for expenditures related to the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension project; and WHEREAS, the WRCOG Executive Committee approved the TUMF Reimbursement Agreement at its June 1, 2020 meeting.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

Section 1. The Banning City Council adopts Resolution 2020- 97 authorizing the City Manager to execute the TUMF Reimbursement Agreement with WRCOG for up to 1,000,000 in TUMF funds for the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension project.

Section 2. The City Manager or his designee is authorized to record the reimbursement funds and to make all necessary budget adjustments, appropriations and transfers related to the TUMF Reimbursement Agreement for the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension project.

Resolution 2020- 97 1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 680
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of July, 2020.

ATTEST:

S~ Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning

APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND LEGAL CONTENT:
7~ %C/44
Kevin G. Ennis, Esq., City Attorney
Richards, Watson & Gershon
Resolution 2020- 97
Daniela Andrade, Mayor
City of Banning
2 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 681
CERTIFICATION:

I, Sonja De La Fuente , Deputy City Clerk of the City of Bann ing , Ca liforn ia , do hereby certify that the foregoing Reso lution No. 2020-97 , was adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning at a Regular Meeting thereof held on the 14th day of July , 2020 , by the following vote , to wit:

AYES : Councilmembers Happe, Pingree, Wallace, Welch and Mayor Andrade NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Sonja uente , Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning
Re solutio n 20 20- 97 3
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 682
RESOLUTION 2020- 48

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA,

AWARDING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE DESIGN OF

THE SUN LAKES BOULEVARD EXTENSION FROM HIGHLAND HOME ROAD TO SUNSET AVENUE, TO ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES IN THE AMOUNT OF 548, 416. 05 AND APPROVING A 10% CONTINGENCY FOR A TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET OF " NOT -TO -EXCEED" $603, 258. 05
WHEREAS, there is a current need for a new road on the south side of Interstate 10 to close a gap in the City' s street network from Highland Home Road to Sunset Avenue to reduce existing congestion at the Highland Springs Avenue interchange and to accommodate expected growth within the City; and
WHEREAS, on February 11, 2020, under Resolution 2020-1 the City Council accepted Lots A, D, E, F and G for the necessary right- of- way for the extension of Sun Lakes Boulevard from Highland Home Road to Sunset Avenue. The lots were originally offered to the City on Parcel Map 25541 approved on August 28, 1990, at which time the City deferred the approval of the right- of- way to a future date; and WHEREAS, on March 24, 2020, under Resolution 2020- 37, the City Council approved General Plan Amendment 19- 2502 and Environmental Assessment 19- 1503, a proposed amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan to modify the alignment of Sun Lakes Boulevard from its existing General Plan alignment with Lincoln Street to the proposed alignment with Westward Avenue following closely the right- of- way offered on Parcel Map 25541; and
WHEREAS, on February 18, 2020, staff released an Invitation for Bid for the Design of the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension to five ( 5) consultants on the on -call engineering list approved by City Council on September 10, 2019 under Resolution 2019- 116 and received three ( 3) proposals ranging in costs from $ 508, 678 to $ 849, 674; and
WHEREAS, staff evaluated the proposals based on qualifications, cost, experience with the request scope of services and response to the request for proposals. As a result, staff recommends the award of a professional services agreement to Albert A. Webb Associates, in the amount of $548, 416. 05; and WHEREAS, the total project budget of $ 603, 258. 05, which includes a 10% contingency, will be funded by Measure A funds. The project costs are eligible and expected to be reimbursed by the Western Riverside Council of Governments ( WRCOG) via the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee ( TUMF) program. 1 Resolution 2020- 48
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 683
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. The City of Banning City Council adopts Resolution No. 2020- 48 Professional Services Agreement for the Design of the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension from Highland Home Road to Sunset Avenue, to Albert A. Webb Associates in the amount of $ 548, 416. 05 and approves a 10% contingency for a total project budget of "not -to -exceed" $603, 258. 05.

SECTION 2. City Council authorizes the City Manager or his designee to make necessary budget adjustments, appropriations and transfers related to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates and to approve change orders within the 10% contingency.

SECTION 3. The City Manager is authorized to execute the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk is authorized to certify the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 14th day of April, 2020.

Daniela Andrade, Mayor
City of Banning
ATTEST:

Sonja D- a uente, Deputy City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL CONTENT:

Kevin G. Ennis, Esq., City Attorney
Richards, Watson & Gershon
2 Resolution 2020- 48
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 684
CERTIFICATION:

I, Sonja De La Fuente, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2020- 48 was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning at a Regular Meeting thereof held on the 14th of April, 2020.

AYES: Councilmembers Happe, Pingree, Wallace, Welch & Mayor Andrade NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Sonja De 9 ente, Deputy City Clerk
City of Banning, California
3 Resolution 2020- 48
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 685
2344655v8
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (C00660) FOR THE

DESIGN OF SUN LAKES BOULEVARD EXTENSION BY AND

BETWEEN CITY OF BANNING AND ALBERT A WEBB ASSOCIATES
THIS AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (herein “Agreement”) is made and entered into this day: ___________________, (“Effective Date”) by and between the CITY OF BANNING, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and ALBERT A WEBB ASSOCIATES, a California corporation, (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. City has sought, by issuance of a Request for Proposals, the performance of the services for the design of Sun Lakes Boulevard extension prepared in connection therewith, and as further defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement.

B. Consultant, following submission of a proposal or bid for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, was selected by City to perform those services.

C. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.

D. Pursuant to the City of Banning’s Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

1.1 Scope of Services.

In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide those services specified in the “Scope of Services” attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference, which services may be referred to herein as the “Services” hereunder. As a material inducement to City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the Services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the Services contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all Services described herein. Consultant covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the Services required hereunder and that all materials will be of good quality, and fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “highest professional DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 6/23/2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 686
-2- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
standards” shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more first-class firms performing similar work under similar circumstances. This Agreement calls for services that, in whole or in part, constitute “public works” as defined in the California Labor Code. Therefore, as to those services that are “public works,” Consultant shall comply in all respects with all applicable provisions of the California Labor Code, including those set forth in Exhibit B hereto.

1.2 Contract Documents and Exhibits.

This Agreement includes the Request for Proposal and Consultant’s accepted proposal (“Contract Documents”), both of which are on file with the City and incorporated herein by this general reference as though fully set forth herein. Exhibit A (Scope of Services), Exhibit B (Special Requirements), Exhibit C (Schedule of Compensation), and Exhibit D (Schedule of Performance) also constitute a part of this Agreement and are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. Except as set forth in Section 1.10 regarding Exhibit B, this Agreement controls over the Contract Documents and the provisions in Exhibits A, B and C.

1.3 Compliance with Law.

Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of City and any Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered, and shall render all Services hereunder in accordance therewith.

1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments.

Consultant shall obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement, at its sole cost and expense, all necessary licenses, permits, certificates and approvals required by law for the performance of Services under this Agreement, including a City business license. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for all fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and which arise from or are necessary for Consultant’s performance of the Services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents, against all such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder.

1.5 Familiarity with Services.

By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant: (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the Scope of Services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how the Services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities and any difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the Services under this Agreement. If the Services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions existing therein, prior to commencement of Services hereunder. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the Services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer (defined in Section 1.12. A).

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 687
-3- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc

1.6 Prevention of Loss and Damages.

Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the Term (defined in Section 3.4) to furnish continuous protection to the work product, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the Services by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City’s own negligence.

1.7 Further Responsibilities of Parties.

Both Parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both Parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonable necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither Party shall be responsible to perform the Services of the other.

1.8 Additional Services.

City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the Services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra services beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or to make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from the Services. No such extra services may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer to Consultant, which written order incorporates therein an adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum (as defined in Section

2.1), and/or (ii) the Schedule of Performance, (as defined in Section 3.2), and which written order is approved in writing by Consultant. Any increase in compensation of up to five percent (5%) of the Contract Sum, or $25,000, whichever is less; or in the Schedule of Performance of up to one hundred eighty (180) days may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively, must be approved by City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to Services which are specifically set forth in the Scope of Services or which are reasonably contemplated therein. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the Services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor.

1.9 Facilities and Equipment.

Except as otherwise provided, Consultant shall, at its own cost and expense, provide all facilities and equipment necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement. City shall make available to Consultant only physical facilities such as desks, filing cabinets, and conference space (“City Facilities”), as City deems, in its sole discretion, to be reasonably necessary for Consultant’s use while consulting with City employees and reviewing records and the information in possession of City. The location, quality, and time of furnishing City Facilities shall be in the sole discretion of City. In no event shall City be required to furnish any facilities that may involve incurring any direct expense, including but not limited to a computer, long distance telephone, network data, internet or other communication charges, vehicles and reproduction facilities.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 688
-4- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc

1.10 Special Requirements.

Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the “Special Requirements” attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit B and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit B shall govern.

1.11 Corrections.

In addition to the indemnification obligations set forth in Article 4, and Sections 1.4, 1.13,

5.3, 5.4, and 6.3, Consultant shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the Services which may be disclosed during City’s review of Consultant’s report or plans. Should Consultant fail to make such correction(s) in a reasonably timely manner, such correction(s) may be made by City, and the cost thereof shall be charged to Consultant. In addition to all other available remedies, City may deduct the cost of such correction(s) from any retention amount held by City, or may withhold payment otherwise owed Consultant under this Agreement up to the amount of the cost of correction(s), as provided in Section 6.3.

1.12 Party Representatives.

A. Contract Officer: For the purposes of this Agreement, the Contract Officer shall be the City Manager, or such other person designated in writing by the City Manager (“Contract Officer”). Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager, to sign all documents on behalf of City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement.

B. Principals and Personnel of Consultant.
1) Consultant Representative: The following principal of Consultant is hereby designated as being the Consultant Representative authorized to act on Consultant’s behalf regarding the Services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith:

Name Title
Dilesh Sheth Vice President
It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing Consultant Representative were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing Consultant Representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the Services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the Consultant Representative. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing Consultant Representative may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced or reassigned by Consultant without the express written approval of City. It shall be Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the Services, and Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 689
-5- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
2) Consultant’s Personnel: Consultant has, or will secure at its own expense, all personnel required to perform the Services required under this Agreement. All of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision, and all personnel engaged in the Services shall be qualified to perform such Services. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant’s staff and sub-contractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services required under this Agreement.

Consultant shall notify City of all changes in Consultant’s staff and sub-contractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance. In the event that City, in its sole discretion, at any time during the term of this Agreement, desires to reassign any staff or sub-contractor of Consultant, City shall give notice as set forth in Section 8.1. Consultant shall, immediately upon the receipt of the notice to re-assign staff from City, reassign such person or persons.

1.13 Independent Contractor.

A. Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee of City.

Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City. All Services provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods, and details of performing the Services. Any additional personnel performing Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance.

B. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Consultant’s personnel practices. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant’s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section.

1.14 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment.

The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, the Consultant Representative and employees were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement.

Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the Services required hereunder without the express written approval of City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 690
-6- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shall release Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City.

ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.

2.1 Contract Sum.

Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, as full compensation for Services satisfactorily rendered, City shall pay Consultant at the hourly rates set forth in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference. In no event shall Consultant be paid more than $ 548,416.05 (the “Contract Sum”). The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by City. Coordination of the performance of the Services with City is a critical component of the Services. If Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending those meetings.

2.2 Method of Compensation.

The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion of the Services, (ii) payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the Services, (iii) payment for time and materials based upon Consultant’s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, provided that time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, but not exceeding the Contract Sum or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation.

2.3 Reimbursable Expenses.

City shall only reimburse Consultant for those actual and necessary expenses expressly set forth in Exhibit C. Reimbursable expenses may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in advance, or actual sub-contractor expenses of an approved sub-contractor pursuant to Section 1.14, and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation.

2.4 Unauthorized Services and Expenses.

City will not pay for any Services or reimburse for any expenses incurred which are not specified in the Scope of Services, unless authorized in writing as set forth in Section 1.8 of this Agreement. City shall make payment for such authorized additional Services and expenses in accordance with Article 2 of this Agreement.

2.5 Invoices.

Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all Services performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month. Each such invoice shall contain all of the information set forth in Section IV of Exhibit C to this Agreement. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the Agreement. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate Services performed by more than one person.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 691
-7- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
City shall independently review each invoice submitted by Consultant to determine whether the Services performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within thirty (30) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and undisputed invoice, except as to any charges for Services performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 6.3. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City of any invoice provided by Consultant shall not constitute waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law.

2.6 Waiver.

Payment to Consultant for Services performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in Services performed by Consultant.

ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE

3.1 Time of Essence.

Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not be construed to limit or deprive a Party of the benefits of any grace or use period allowed in this Agreement.

3.2 Schedule of Performance.

Consultant shall commence the Services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all Services within the time period(s) established in the “Schedule of Performance” attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by this reference.

3.3 Force Majeure.

The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement may be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Consultant. Such unforeseeable consequences include, but are not restricted to, acts of God or public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including City, if Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the Services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified, subject to the provisions of Section 1.8. The Contract Officer’s determination (or the City Council’s determination, in the event the period of enforced delay exceeds the period specified in Section

1.8) shall be final and conclusive upon the Parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused; Consultant’s sole remedy shall be the extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 692
-8- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc

3.4 Term.

The Term of this Agreement shall be from the Effective Date through October 3, 2022, unless sooner terminated as provided in Article 6 of this Agreement or extended as provided in Sections 1.8 and 3.3 of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 4. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

4.1 Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance.

Consultant shall procure and at all times during the term of this Agreement carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect, insurance as follows:

A. Commercial General Liability Insurance with a minimum limit of $1,000,000.00 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage and a general aggregate limit of $2,000,000.00 per project or location. If Consultant is a limited liability company, the commercial general liability coverage shall be amended so that Consultant and its managers, members, affiliates, employees, agents and other persons necessary or incidental to its operation are insureds.

B. Automobile Liability Insurance for any owned, non-owned or hired vehicle used in connection with the performance of this Agreement with a combined single limit of $1,000,000.00 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. If Consultant does not use any owned, non-owned or hired vehicles in the performance of Services under this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain a non-owned auto endorsement to the Commercial General Liability policy.

C. Workers’ Compensation Insurance as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance with a minimum limit of $1,000,000.00 per accident for bodily injury or disease. If Consultant has no employees while performing Services under this Agreement, workers’ compensation policy is not required; however, Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees.

D. Professional Liability/Errors and Omissions Insurance with minimum limits of $1,000,000.00 per claim and in the aggregate.

4.2 Acceptability of Insurers.

The insurance policies required under this Article shall be issued by an insurer admitted to write insurance in the State of California with a rating of A:VII or better in the latest DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 693
-9- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
edition of the A.M. Best Insurance Rating Guide. Self-insurance shall not be considered to comply with the insurance requirements under this Article.

4.3 Additional Insured.

The commercial general and automobile liability policies shall contain an endorsement naming City, its officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds.

4.4 Primary and Non-Contributing.

The insurance policies required under this Article shall apply on a primary noncontributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance available to City. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its officers, employees, agents or volunteers, shall be in excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

4.5 Consultant’s Waiver of Subrogation.

The insurance policies required under this Article shall not prohibit Consultant and Consultant’s employees, agents or sub-contractors from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives all rights of subrogation against City.

4.6 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions.

Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At City’s option, Consultant shall either reduce or eliminate the deductibles or self-insured retentions with respect to City; or Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and expenses.

4.7 Cancellations or Modifications to Coverage.

Consultant shall not cancel, reduce or otherwise modify the insurance policies required by this Article during the term of this Agreement. The commercial general and automobile liability policies required under this Agreement shall be endorsed to state that should the issuing insurer cancel the policy before the expiration date, the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail 30 days’ prior written notice to City. If any insurance policy required under this Article is canceled or reduced in coverage or limits, Consultant shall, within two (2) Business Days (as defined in Section 8.12) of notice from the insurer, phone, fax or notify City via certified mail, return receipt requested, of the cancellation of or changes to the policy.

4.8 City Remedy for Noncompliance.

If Consultant does not maintain the policies of insurance required under this Article in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement, or in the event any of Consultant’s policies do not comply with the requirements under this Article, City may either immediately terminate this Agreement or, if insurance is available at a reasonable cost, City may, but has no duty to, take out the necessary insurance and pay, at Consultant’s expense, the premium thereon.

Consultant shall promptly reimburse City for any premium paid by City, or City may withhold amounts sufficient to pay the premiums from payments due to Consultant.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 694
-10- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc

4.9 Evidence of Insurance.

Prior to the performance of Services under this Agreement, Consultant shall furnish the City Clerk with a certificate or certificates of insurance and all original endorsements evidencing and effecting the coverages required under this Article. The endorsements are subject to City’s approval. Consultant may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies to City. Consultant shall maintain current endorsements on file with the City Clerk.

Consultant shall provide proof to the City Clerk that insurance policies expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Consultant shall furnish such proof at least two (2) weeks prior to the expiration of the coverages.

4.10 Indemnity Requirements not Limiting.

Procurement of insurance by Consultant shall not be construed as a limitation of Consultant’s liability or as full performance of Consultant’s duty to indemnify City under this Agreement.

4.11 Sub-contractor Insurance Requirements.

Consultant shall require each of its sub-contractors that perform Services under this Agreement to maintain insurance coverage that meets all of the requirements of this Article.

4.12 Indemnification, Hold Harmless, and Duty to Defend.

A. Indemnification of City.
1) Indemnity for Design Professional Services. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, protect, indemnify, and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, designated volunteers, successors, assigns and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”), from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, judgments, penalties, liens, and losses of any nature whatsoever, including fees of accountants, attorneys, or other professionals and all costs associated therewith, and reimbursement of attorney’s fees and costs of defense (collectively “Liabilities”), whether actual, alleged or threatened, which arise out of, are claimed to arise out of, pertain to, or relate to, in whole or in part, the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, material men, contractors or their officers, agents, servants or employees (or any entity or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of design professional services under this Agreement by a “design professional,” as the term is defined under California Civil Code Section 2782.8(c). 2) Other Indemnities. Other than in the performance of design professional services, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, defend, hold harmless and indemnify Indemnitees from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, expenses, judgments, penalties, liens, and losses of any nature whatsoever, including fees of accountants, attorneys, or other professionals and all costs associated therewith and the payment of all consequential DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 695
-11- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
damages (collectively “Claims”), at law or in equity, whether actual, alleged or threatened, which arise out of, are claimed to arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts or omissions of Consultant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, sub-contractors, materialmen, consultants or their officers, agents, servants or employees (or any entity or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of this Agreement, including the Indemnitees’ active or passive negligence, except for Claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees as determined by court decision or by the agreement of the Parties. Consultant shall defend the Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any Claims with counsel of the Indemnitees’ choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all attorneys’ fees and experts’ costs actually incurred in connection with such defense. Consultant shall reimburse the Indemnitees for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by Indemnitees in connection therewith.
3) Consultant shall pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Consultant under this Agreement, and indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Consultant shall fully comply with the workers’ compensation law regarding Consultant and Consultant’s employees. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Consultant to comply with applicable workers’ compensation laws.

City may offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant’s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this subparagraph A.3. 4) Consultant shall obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those in this Article from each and every sub-contractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. If Consultant fails to obtain such indemnities, Consultant shall be fully responsible and indemnify, hold harmless and defend the Indemnitees from and against any and all Liabilities and Claims, in law or in equity, whether actual, alleged or threatened, which arise out of, are claimed to arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts or omissions of Consultant’s sub-contractor, its officers, agents, servants, employees, sub-contractors, materialmen, contractors or their officers, agents, servants or employees (or any entity or individual that Consultant’s sub-contractor shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of this Agreement, including the Indemnitees’ active or passive negligence, except for Liabilities and Claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees, as determined by court decision or by the agreement of the Parties.

B. Workers’ Compensation Acts not Limiting. Consultant’s indemnifications and obligations under this Article, or any other provision of this Agreement, shall not be limited by the provisions of any workers’ compensation act or similar act. Consultant expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statutes or laws as to City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers.

C. Insurance Requirements not Limiting. City does not, and shall not, waive any rights that it may possess against Consultant because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. The indemnities in this Article shall apply regardless of whether or not any insurance policies are determined to be applicable to the Liabilities, tax, assessment, penalty or interest asserted against City.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 696
-12- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
D. Survival of Terms. Consultant’s indemnifications and obligations under this Article shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 5. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION

5.1 Service Records.

Consultant shall keep, and require sub-contractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and Services performed hereunder (the “Service Records”), as shall be necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such Services. Any and all such Service Records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such Service Records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make copies and transcripts from such Service Records. Such Service Records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the Services hereunder, and City shall have access to such Service Records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant’s business, custody of the Service Records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Consultant’s successor in interest (“Consultant’s Successor”). If custody of the Service Records is given to Consultant’s Successor, Consultant shall give written notice to City of the transfer of the Service Records to Consultant’s Successor. The notice shall include contact information (address and telephone number) for Consultant’s Successor, and access shall be provided to City by Consultant’s Successor.

5.2 Reports.

Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the Services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that City is greatly concerned about the cost of Services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the Services contemplated herein, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of that fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto.

5.3 Ownership of Documents.

All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the “Consultant Documents”) prepared by Consultant, its employees, sub-contractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the Consultant Documents hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed Consultant Documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted Consultant Documents without specific written authorization by Consultant will be at City’s sole DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 697
-13- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use or assignment. Consultant may retain copies of such Consultant Documents for its own use. Consultant shall have an unrestricted right to use the concepts embodied therein. All sub-contractors shall provide for assignment to City of all Consultant Documents prepared by them; and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom.

5.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information.

A. All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer.

B. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or sub-contractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the Services performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.

C. If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or sub-contractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorneys’ fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct.

D. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or sub-contractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any Party regarding this Agreement and the Services performed thereunder. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite the response.

ARTICLE 6. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION

6.1 California Law.

This Agreement, and any dispute arising from the relationship between the Parties to this Agreement, shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the Parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 698
-14- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in Riverside.

6.2 Disputes; Default.

A. In the event that City determines Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any Services performed after the date of default. In addition to the provisions of Section 4.8, and the right to terminate pursuant to Section 6.7, if the City Manager determines that Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, City may serve Consultant with written notice of the default. Consultant shall have ten (10) calendar days after service upon it of the notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance.

In the event that Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, City may, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.

B. In the event of termination pursuant to this Section, City may take over the Services and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the Services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed City as provided in Section 6.3.

6.3 Retention of Funds.

Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement): (i) any payment amount of which may be in dispute hereunder or which is necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, (ii) all amounts retained pursuant to the provisions of Section 4.8, (iii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant’s obligation under this Agreement, and (iv) all payments due or that become due to Consultant during the period that Consultant or any of its sub-contractors fail to maintain any required insurance in full force and effect, until notice is received by City that the required insurance has been restored to full force and effect and that the premiums therefore have been paid for a period satisfactory to City, as provided in Section 4.9, above. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.

6.4 Waiver.

Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 699
-15- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement.

Acceptance by City of any Services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting Party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.

Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing, and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.

6.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative.

Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other Party.

6.6 Legal Action.

In addition to any other rights or remedies, either Party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Consultant must file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections 905 et seq. and 910 et seq., in order to pursue a legal action against City under this Agreement.

6.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term.

This Article 6 shall govern any termination of this Agreement except as specifically provided in Section 6.2 for termination for default of Consultant. City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Consultant, except that where termination is due to the fault of Consultant, the period of notice may be a shorter time as may be determined by the Contract Officer. In addition, Consultant reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon sixty (60) days’ written notice to City, except that where termination is due to the fault of City, the period of notice may be a shorter time as Consultant may determine. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all Services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Except where Consultant has initiated termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all Services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any Services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 6.3. In the event Consultant has initiated termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced hereunder. In the event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the terminating Party need not provide the non-terminating Party with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 6.2.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 700
-16- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc

6.8 Attorneys’ Fees.

In any litigation or other proceeding by which a Party seeks to enforce its rights under this Agreement (whether in contract, tort or both) or seeks a declaration of any rights or obligations under this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees. Attorneys’ fees shall include attorney’s fees on any appeal, and in addition the Party entitled to attorneys’ fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment.

ARTICLE 7. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION

7.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees.

No officer or employee of City shall be personally liable to Consultant, or Consultant’s Successor, in the event of any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Consultant or Consultant’s Successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.

7.2 Conflict of Interest.

Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or sub-contractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement.

No officer or employee of City shall have any direct or indirect financial interest in this Agreement within the scope of Government Code section 1090, nor shall any such officer or employee make, participate in making, or use his or her official position to influence, any City decision relating to the Agreement which has a material financial effect on his or her financial interests or the financial interests of any corporation, partnership or association in which he or she is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.

Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and sub-contractors, if any, shall comply with all conflict of interest statutes of the State of California applicable to Consultant’s Services under this Agreement, including the Political Reform Act (Gov. Code § 81000, et seq.) and Government Code Section 1090. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant may perform similar services for other clients; but Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and subcontractors shall not, without the Contract Officer’s prior written approval, perform services for another person or entity for whom Consultant is not currently performing services that would DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 701
-17- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
require Consultant or one of its officers, employees, associates or sub-contractors to abstain from a decision under this Agreement pursuant to a conflict of interest statute. Consultant shall incorporate a clause substantially similar to this Section into any subcontract that Consultant executes in connection with the performance of this Agreement.

7.3 Covenant Against Discrimination.

Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement.

Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, or ancestry, or other protected class.

7.4 Unauthorized Aliens.

Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of Services covered by this Agreement, and should the any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by City.

ARTICLE 8. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

8.1 Notices.

Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, bill, invoice, report or other communication required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and conclusively deemed effective: (a) on confirmed delivery by courier service or overnight delivery service during Consultant’s and City’s regular business hours; or (b) three (3) Business Days after deposit in the United States mail, by certified or registered mail, and addressed to the Party to be notified as set forth below:

If to City Attn: Patrick Safari
Associate Engineer
City of Banning
99 East Ramsey Street
Banning, California 90220
Email: [email protected]
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 702
-18- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
With a courtesy copy to: Kevin G. Ennis, City Attorney
Richards, Watson & Gershon
355 South Grand Avenue, 40th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
Email: [email protected]
If to Consultant: Dilesh Sheth
Vice President
Albert A. Webb Associates
3788 McCray Street
Riverside, CA 92506
Email: [email protected]

8.2 Interpretation.

The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either Party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

8.3 Counterparts.

This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument.

8.4 Integration; Amendment.

This Agreement, and all exhibits referred to in this Agreement, constitute the final, complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement between the Parties pertaining to the subject matter of this Agreement and supersede all other and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the Parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No Party has been induced to enter into this Agreement by, nor is any Party relying on, any representation or warranty except those expressly set forth in this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by Consultant and by City Council. The Parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void.

8.5 Severability.

In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the Parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either Party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 703
-19- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc

8.6 Mutual Cooperation.

A. City’s Cooperation. City shall provide Consultant with all pertinent data, documents and other requested information as is reasonably available for Consultant’s proper performance of the Services required under this Agreement.

B. Consultant’s Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to Consultant’s performance of Services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance that City requires.

8.7 No Third Party Beneficiaries Intended.

This Agreement is made solely for the benefit of the Parties to this Agreement and their respective successors and assigns, and no other person or entity may have or acquire a right by virtue of this Agreement.

8.8 Final Payment Acceptance Constitutes Release.

The acceptance by Consultant of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of City from all claims and liabilities for compensation to Consultant for anything done, furnished or relating to Consultant’s Services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of City’s check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten (10) calendar days of the receipt of that check. However, approval or payment by City shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of Consultant, its employees, sub-contractors and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or Services performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by City for any defect or error in the Services prepared by Consultant, its employees, sub-contractors and agents.

8.9 Non-Appropriation of Funds.

Payments to be made to Consultant by City for Services performed within the current fiscal year which are within the current fiscal budget and within an available, unexhausted fund. In the event that City does not appropriate sufficient funds for payment of Consultant’s Services beyond the current fiscal year, this Agreement shall cover payment for Consultant’s Services only to the conclusion of the last fiscal year in which City appropriates sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at the conclusion of such fiscal year.

8.10 Headings.

The headings in this Agreement are included solely for convenience of reference and shall not affect the interpretation of any provision of this Agreement or any of the rights or obligations of the Parties to this Agreement.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 704
-20- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc

8.11 Word Usage.

Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, (a) the words “shall,” “will” and “agrees” are mandatory and “may” is permissive; (b) “or” is not exclusive; and (c) “includes” or “including” are not limiting.

8.12 Business Days.
“Business Days” refers to days that the Banning City Hall is open for business.

8.13 Corporate Authority.

The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties hereto warrant that (i): such Party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of that Party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such Party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which that Party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 705
-21- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first hereinabove written.

CITY OF BANNING CONSULTANT
Douglas Schulze, Date
City Manager
NAME: Date
TITLE:

NAME: Date
TITLE:

ATTEST:

Tax ID No.

Sonja De La Fuente Date
Deputy City Clerk
Address:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Richards, Watson & Gershon
City Council Approval: 04/14/2020
Kevin G. Ennis, Esq., Date
City Attorney
NOTE: PROOF OF AUTHORITY TO BIND CONTRACTING PARTY REQUIRED. APPROPRIATE

ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 Dilesh Sheth
Vice President
3788 McCray Street, Riverside, Ca 92506
6/23/2020
95-1723730
6/23/2020
6/23/2020
6/23/2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 706
Exhibit “A”-1
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. Consultant will perform the following Services in connection with providing design of Sun Lakes Boulevard extension prepared in connection therewith:

I. As part of the Services, Consultant will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products to City:

A. Consultant shall provide services necessary to provide a complete (construction ready) project.

Task 1. Project Management
The consultant shall attend regular status meetings with the City throughout the duration of the project as well as prepare monthly progress reports. The consultant shall develop and maintain a detailed work program and schedule the development of a project specific Work Plan. The Work Plan will include, at a minimum, details of methodology, sequence of tasks, lists of deliverables, milestone submittal schedule, summary of organizational responsibilities and contacts, as well as reporting and invoicing procedures. The consultant will meet face to face with the Project Design Team (PDT) monthly. The consultant will be responsible to facilitate other meetings as necessary with City Departments and other key stakeholders, creating meeting agendas with input from the City and prepare and distribute meeting minutes.

Deliverables: Work Plan, Monthly Progress Reports, Meeting Agendas and Meeting Minutes.

Task 2. Project Development

2.1 Data Collection and Site Reconnaissance
Consultant shall collect and review available existing reports, data, as-built plans, and information relevant to the project from the City, County and any other agency necessary to complete the work, including assessor’s information and any utilities that exist in the area. Consultant shall conduct a field investigation to familiarize the project team with the drainage conditions, flow patterns, existing design constraints and existing/ongoing improvements in the project area.

Deliverables: Field Review Notes, Photo Logs, Copies of Existing Data

2.2 Survey and Aerial Topographic Mapping
Consultant shall research available record information pertaining to the project including: Tract Maps, Records of Survey, Parcel Maps and Right-of-Way Maps.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 707
Exhibit “A”-2
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
Consultant shall provide topographical mapping at 1-foot contour intervals and field surveying to identify existing topographical features. Tie out any and all survey monuments that may be disturbed by the work. Establish street centerline and centerline stationing to an accuracy of one-tenth foot (0.10’). Establish temporary benchmarks required for the work and provide all elevations, dimensions and other measurements necessary to establish proper line and grade.

Deliverables: AutoCAD drawing file of the survey points

2.3 Utility Research and Base Mapping
Consultant shall act on behalf of the City of Banning and contact all utility purveyors to determine if existing facilities are present in the area. Utility data shall be base mapped and include appropriate identification by their respective owner, location and size.

2.4 Public Outreach
Due to the number of residences and existing developments located adjacent to the project site, the Consultant shall include the necessary public outreach. At a minimum, this shall be conducted in an “Open house” fashion to give the adjacent neighbors a chance to learn about the project and note any potential concerns.

Deliverables: Letters to Utility Owners, Utility As-Built Maps, Utility Base Map Task 3. Preliminary Engineering Design

3.1 Roadway Geometric Approval Drawings (GAD’s)
Consultant shall analyze and prepare a proposed alignment consistent with the existing right-of-way and in accordance with the Caltrans Highway Design Manual for geometric features. It is anticipated that right-of-way will not be required as a part of this project; however, construction easements, slope easements, etc. may still be required. The GAD shall include typical cross sections as well as the identification of existing rights-of-way and property lines to determine any need for right-of-way or easements.

Deliverables: Geometric Approval Drawings (30% Complete Plans), Preliminary Cost Estimate, Preliminary Right-of-Way Requirements Map

3.2 Preliminary Roadway Drainage Plans
Consultant shall prepare drainage design for the proposed improvements in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) design standards. The consultant shall review any available hydrology reports and prepare necessary analysis in accordance with RCFC&WCD DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 708
Exhibit “A”-3
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
as well as City requirements to determine the amount of drainage tributary to the project area and to review the capacity of existing drainage facilities. Consultant shall review public agency’s available hydrology/hydraulic and storm drain plan records for existing drainage facilities within and adjacent to the project site.

Existing drainage patterns and runoff tributary areas to the site shall be determined.

Consultant shall perform necessary analysis to determine hydraulic function and size of necessary facilities.

Deliverables: Drainage Design Report, 30% Drainage Plans (shown on the GAD) Task 4. Environmental Documentation
Consultant shall identify environmental impacts under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) if necessary.

Environmental services shall include identification and preparation of an Initial Study Assessment, technical studies and environmental document for City review and approval as necessary for CEQA clearance. The City currently anticipates an IS/MND as the appropriate CEQA document for the project. The Consultant shall evaluate the City’s recommendation and determine if the IS/MND is the appropriate document for this project. Based on this assumption, the proposal should include timing and cost breakdowns for the initial assessment, as well as costs associated with potential focused surveys. At a minimum, the consultant shall address:

4.1 Traffic Impact Analysis
Consultant shall prepare a TIA for the proposed improvements for CEQA documentation. The study will address the changes in traffic volumes and patterns in the immediate vicinity. At a minimum, the study shall look at adjacent intersections to determine if traffic controls (stop control, traffic signals, etc.) are required. The consultant shall assume that Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis will be required in conformance with SB 743.

4.2 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas
These studies will be used in the CEQA review. The studies should include a written report (with photos of the site) discussing air quality and greenhouse gas impacts.

4.3 Biological Study
Based on the recent Negative Declaration for the modification to the City’s General Plan Circulation Element, at a minimum this shall include a burrowing owl survey and Los Angeles Pocket Mouse Survey. An MSHCP consistency analysis will need to be completed as a part of this study. The necessary habitat assessments shall include written reports (with photos of the site) indicating whether or not the site contains suitable habitat.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 709
Exhibit “A”-4
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc

4.4 Cultural Study and Paleontological Resources Report The Cultural Study and Paleontological Resources Report should include a written report following the guidelines for Archaeological Resource Management Reports prepared by the California Office of Historical Preservation, Preservation Planning Bulletin 4(a), December 1989. AB52 compliance shall also be included in the scope of services.

4.5 Noise Study
The Noise Study shall include a written report (with photos of the site) identifying short- and long-term noise impacts, and any mitigation measures required to reduce these impacts to less than significant. Deliverables: CEQA IS/MND, Responses to Comments, Copies of Studies, Correspondence.

Task 5. Final Design Reports and Studies
Consultant shall provide final Design Reports and Studies necessary to complete the project. The following recommendations may be necessary:

5.1 Utility Coordination
Review and verification of facilities that may be in conflict based on results of potholing; relocation of any existing utilities determined to be in conflict; liability for all utility conflicts; agreements as necessary; issuance of notices to relocate as necessary.

5.2 Geotechnical Design Report
Structural conditions and recommendations that may include over excavation and recompaction areas or surcharges; all necessary analysis for proper design of the project objectives, R-values of subgrade material and the structural section of the roadway using the latest traffic index.

5.3 Supplemental Design Surveys
Provide potholing map as necessary for utility surveying in the field; establish potholing location and record elevations of any utilities located.

5.4 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
In compliance with National Pollution Discharge Elimination system (NPDES) requirements as well as Construction General Permits; address project’s risk level; provide Notice of Intent (NOI) and assist with uploading NOI & SWPPP into the “SMARTs” system.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 710
Exhibit “A”-5
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
Deliverables: Utility Correspondences (i.e. Relocation Claim Letters, Agreements, Notice to Relocate, etc.), Final Studies/Reports.

Task 6. Final Design Plans, Specifications and Estimates Consultant shall prepare a complete set of improvement plans compatible with AutoCAD 2019. PS&E submittals will be required at the 60%, 90% and 100% design intervals. The plans shall include a cover sheet with all sheets using the City title block and prepared in accordance with the regulations and standards of the City of Banning. At a minimum, the plans shall include the following new, modification or relocation of existing improvements:
· Street Improvements
· Grading
· Easement Documents
· Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter
· Retaining Walls and/or Structures
· Storm Drain
· Landscape & Irrigation
· Signing & Striping
· Erosion Control and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (if necessary) · Construction Options, Phasing and Detour Plans
· Street Lighting, Traffic Signals and Modifications
· Utilities
· Intersecting Street Designs
· Driveway Approaches
· Record of Existing Survey Monuments
· Other Related Work
Consultant shall address all plan check comments, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Final Plans shall be submitted on 24” X 36” mylars Deliverables: 60%, 90%, 100% PS&E Submittals, Final PS&E, Electronic Versions of each Submittal.

Task 7. Permitting
Consultant shall investigate and process all required permits if necessary, including, but not limited to the following: Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District, National Pollution Discharge Elimination System, U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, State of California Water Resources Control Board, and Regional Conservation Authority.

Deliverables: Correspondence with Various Agencies, Permit Applications and Final Permits
Task 8. Bidding/Construction Support
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 711
Exhibit “A”-6
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
Consultant shall be available during the advertisement and construction of the project to answer RFI’s as well as prepare necessary addenda. The consultant shall plan to attend, at a minimum, the following meetings: pre-bid meeting and preconstruction meeting. The Consultant shall review shop drawings and submittals from the contractor for conformance with the contract plans and specifications, and make recommendations for acceptance, denial or re-submittal within reasonable time of receipt. Upon written authorization from the City, consultant shall provide engineering design services for revisions to construction documents resulting from changed or unforeseen conditions, or other change order work required due to actions of the City. The Consultant shall assume a minimum of eight (8) site visits during construction as requested by the City. Upon completion of the project, the consultant shall use information based on redlined information provided by the contractor and the City to prepare as-built plans. As-built plans shall be submitted to the City within one (1) month of receipt of as-built plans.

Deliverables: Meeting Attendance, Response to Bidder’s/Contractor’s RFIs, Design Addenda, Submittal Reviews, As-Built Plans
II. In addition to the requirements of Parts I and II of this Scope of Services, during the performance of the Services, Consultant will keep City appraised through periodic status reports regarding the performance of the Services under this Agreement as set forth below and in Section 5.2, by the following means:

A. In-person meetings or teleconference.

B. Email updates/questions to applicant team and City while reviews are underway.

C. Conference calls.

III. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by City, and must be revised by Consultant without additional charge to City until found satisfactory and accepted by City.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 712
Exhibit “B”-1
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
EXHIBIT “B”

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

TERMS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA LABOR LAW REQUIREMENTS

1. This Agreement calls for services that, in whole or in part, constitute “public works” as defined in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code (“Chapter 1”). Further, Consultant acknowledges that this Agreement is subject to (a) Chapter 1 and (b) the rules and regulations established by the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) implementing such statutes. Therefore, as to those Services that are “public works,” Consultant shall comply with and be bound by all the terms, rules and regulations described in 1(a) and 1(b) as though set forth in full herein.

2. California law requires the inclusion of specific Labor Code provisions in certain contracts. The inclusion of such specific provisions below, whether or not required by California law, does not alter the meaning or scope of Section 1 above.

3. Consultant shall be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations in accordance with California Labor Code Section 1725.5, and has provided proof of registration to City prior to the Effective Date of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform work with any subcontractor that is not registered with DIR pursuant to Section 1725.5. Consultant and subcontractors shall maintain their registration with the DIR in effect throughout the duration of this Agreement. If the Consultant or any subcontractor ceases to be registered with DIR at any time during the duration of the project, Consultant shall immediately notify City.

4. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4, Consultant’s Services are subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by DIR. Consultant shall post job site notices, as prescribed by DIR regulations.

5. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to perform the Agreement are on file at City Hall and will be made available to any interested party on request. Consultant acknowledges receipt of a copy of the DIR determination of such prevailing rate of per diem wages, and Consultant shall post such rates at each job site covered by this Agreement.

6. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1774 and 1775 concerning the payment of prevailing rates of wages to workers and the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages. The Consultant shall, as a penalty to City, forfeit $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates as determined by the DIR for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done pursuant to this Agreement by Consultant or by any subcontractor.

7. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1776, which requires Consultant and each subcontractor to: keep accurate payroll records and verify such records in writing under penalty of perjury, as specified in Section 1776; certify and make such payroll records available for inspection as provided by Section 1776; and inform City of the location of the records.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 713
Exhibit “B”-2
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc

8. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 and California Administrative Code Title 8, Section 200 et seq. concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects. Consultant shall be responsible for compliance with these aforementioned Sections for all apprenticeable occupations.

Prior to commencing work under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide City with a copy of the information submitted to any applicable apprenticeship program. Within 60 days after concluding work pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant and each of its subcontractors shall submit to City a verified statement of the journeyman and apprentice hours performed under this Agreement.

9. The Consultant shall not perform Work with any Subcontractor that has been debarred or suspended pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1777.1 or any other federal or state law providing for the debarment of contractors from public works. The Consultant and Subcontractors shall not be debarred or suspended throughout the duration of this Agreement pursuant to Labor Code Section 1777.1 or any other federal or state law providing for the debarment of contractors from public works. If the Consultant or any subcontractor becomes debarred or suspended during the duration of the project, the Consultant shall immediately notify City.

10. Consultant acknowledges that eight hours labor constitutes a legal day’s work.

Consultant shall comply with and be bound by Labor Code Section 1810. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess hours. The Consultant shall, as a penalty to City, forfeit $25.00 for each worker employed in the performance of this Agreement by the Consultant or by any subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than eight hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to Labor Code section 1815, work performed by employees of Consultant in excess of eight hours per day, and 40 hours during any one week shall be permitted upon public work upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of eight hours per day at not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay.

11. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700 provide that every employer will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1861, Consultant hereby certifies as follows:
“I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.”
Date______________ Signature___________________________ DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 6/23/2020
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 714
Exhibit “B”-3
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc

12. For every subcontractor who will perform work on the project, Consultant shall be responsible for such subcontractor’s compliance with Chapter 1 and Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700, and Consultant shall include in the written contract between it and each subcontractor a copy of those statutory provisions and a requirement that each subcontractor shall comply with those statutory provisions. Consultant shall be required to take all actions necessary to enforce such contractual provisions and ensure subcontractor’s compliance, including, without limitation, conducting a periodic review of the certified payroll records of the subcontractor and upon becoming aware of the failure of the subcontractor to pay his or her workers the specified prevailing rate of wages. Consultant shall diligently take corrective action to halt or rectify any failure.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 715
Exhibit “C”-1
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
EXHIBIT “C”

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
I. Consultant shall perform the following tasks (“Tasks”) at the following rates.

TASK DESCRIPTION SUB-BUDGET

1. Project Management $19,970

2. Project Development $26,206

3. Preliminary Engineering Design $76,154

4. Environmental Documentation $159,470

5. Final Design Report and Studies $67,250

6. Final Design, Specifications and Estimates $183,236

7. Permitting $11,130

8. Bidding/Construction Support $5,000
TOTAL $548,416.05
II. Within the budgeted amounts for each Task, and with the approval of the Contract Officer, funds may be shifted from one Task sub-budget to another so long as the Contract Sum is not exceeded per Section 2.1, unless Additional Services are approved per Section 1.8.

III. City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include:

A. Line items for all personnel describing the Services performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate.

B. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services.

C. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation.

D. Line items for all approved sub-contractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services.

IV. The total compensation for Services shall not exceed $548,416.05 as provided in Section 2.1 of this Agreement.

V. Consultant’s billing rates for all personnel are attached as Exhibit C-1.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 716
Exhibit “D”- 1
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
EXHIBIT “D”

SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
I. Consultant shall perform all Services timely, and deliver the specified tangible work products to City in accordance with the schedule attached as Exhibit D-1.

II. The Contract Officer may approve extensions for performance of the Services in accordance with Sections 1.8 and 3.3.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 717
Exhibit “D-1”- 1
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
EXHIBIT “D-1”

PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 718
5 Section D. Project Schedule
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors
1 Contract Award 0 days Mon 6/1/20 Mon 6/1/20
2 Project Kick‐Off Meeting 0 days Mon 6/1/20 Mon 6/1/20 1 3 Task 1 ‐ Project Management 550 days Mon 6/1/20 Fri 7/8/22 4 1.1 ‐ Coordination and Meetings (Prepare Agendas and Minutes) 550 days Mon 6/1/20 Fri 7/8/22 2 5 1.2 ‐ Prepare Monthly Progress Reports and Work Plans 550 days Mon 6/1/20 Fri 7/8/22 2 6 1.3 ‐ Coordination with Stakeholders and Agencies 300 days Mon 8/31/20 Fri 10/22/21 2 7 Task 2 ‐ Project Development 120 days Mon 6/1/20 Fri 11/13/20 8 2.1 ‐ Data Collection and Site Reconnaissance 30 days Mon 6/1/20 Fri 7/10/20 2 9 2.2 ‐ Survey and Aerial Topographic Mapping 30 days Mon 7/13/20 Fri 8/21/20 8 10 2.3 ‐ Utility Research and Base Mapping 30 days Mon 7/13/20 Fri 8/21/20 8 11 2.4 ‐ Public Outreach 60 days Mon 8/24/20 Fri 11/13/20 10 12 Task 3 ‐ Prelinimary Engineering Design 90 days Mon 8/24/20 Fri 12/25/20 13 3.1 ‐ Roadway Geometric Approval Drawing (GAD) 90 days Mon 8/24/20 Fri 12/25/20 10 14 3.2 ‐ Preliminary Roadway Drainage Plans 90 days Mon 8/24/20 Fri 12/25/20 10 15 Task 4 ‐ Environmental Documentation 450 days Mon 5/4/20 Fri 1/21/22 16 4.1 ‐ Traffic Impact Analysis 180 days Mon 12/28/20 Fri 9/3/21 13 17 4.2 ‐ Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas 180 days Mon 12/28/20 Fri 9/3/21 13 18 4.3 ‐ Biological Study 325 days Mon 5/4/20 Fri 7/30/21 19 4.4 ‐ Cultural Study and Paleontological Report 65 days Mon 5/4/20 Fri 7/31/20 20 4.5 ‐ Noise Study 180 days Mon 12/28/20 Fri 9/3/21 13 21 4.6 ‐ CEQA Documentation 100 days Mon 9/6/21 Fri 1/21/22 16,17,18,19,20 22 Task 5 ‐ Final Design Reports and Studies 180 days Mon 6/1/20 Fri 2/5/21 23 5.1 ‐ Utility Coordination 30 days Mon 6/1/20 Fri 7/10/20 2 24 5.2 ‐ Supplemental Design Survey 30 days Mon 12/28/20 Fri 2/5/21 13 25 5.3 ‐ Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) 60 days Mon 8/24/20 Fri 11/13/20 10 26 Task 6 ‐ Final Design Plans, Specifications and Estimate 380 days Mon 12/28/20 Fri 6/10/22 27 Preparation of 60% Plans 120 days Mon 12/28/20 Fri 6/11/21 13 28 City Review of 60% Plans 30 days Mon 6/14/21 Fri 7/23/21 27 29 Preparation of 90% PS&E 90 days Mon 7/26/21 Fri 11/26/21 28 30 City Review of 90% PS&E 30 days Mon 11/29/21 Fri 1/7/22 29 31 Preparation of 100% PS&E 60 days Mon 1/10/22 Fri 4/1/22 30 32 City Review of 100% PS&E 30 days Mon 4/4/22 Fri 5/13/22 31 33 Approval of PS&E Package 20 days Mon 5/16/22 Fri 6/10/22 32 34 Task 7 ‐ Regulatory Permitting 180 days Mon 1/24/22 Fri 9/30/22 21 35 Task 8 ‐ Bidding / Construction Support 30 days Mon 10/3/22 Fri 11/11/22 34 6/1
6/1
May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Qtr 3, 2020 Qtr 1, 2021 Qtr 3, 2021 Qtr 1, 2022 Qtr 3, 2022 Sun Lakes Blvd. Extension in the City of Banning

Page 1 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5506D702-AAA7-48B1-AC91-3BB493FABE06 719
2344655v8
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (C00660) FOR THE

DESIGN OF SUN LAKES BOULEVARD EXTENSION BY AND

BETWEEN CITY OF BANNING AND ALBERT A WEBB ASSOCIATES
THIS AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (herein “Agreement”) is made and entered into this day: ___________________, (“Effective Date”) by and between the CITY OF BANNING, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and ALBERT A WEBB ASSOCIATES, a California corporation, (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. City has sought, by issuance of a Request for Proposals, the performance of the services for the design of Sun Lakes Boulevard extension prepared in connection therewith, and as further defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement.

B. Consultant, following submission of a proposal or bid for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, was selected by City to perform those services.

C. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.

D. Pursuant to the City of Banning’s Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

1.1 Scope of Services.

In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide those services specified in the “Scope of Services” attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference, which services may be referred to herein as the “Services” hereunder. As a material inducement to City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the Services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the Services contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all Services described herein. Consultant covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the Services required hereunder and that all materials will be of good quality, and fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “highest professional DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 6/23/2020
720
-2- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
standards” shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more first-class firms performing similar work under similar circumstances. This Agreement calls for services that, in whole or in part, constitute “public works” as defined in the California Labor Code. Therefore, as to those services that are “public works,” Consultant shall comply in all respects with all applicable provisions of the California Labor Code, including those set forth in Exhibit B hereto.

1.2 Contract Documents and Exhibits.

This Agreement includes the Request for Proposal and Consultant’s accepted proposal (“Contract Documents”), both of which are on file with the City and incorporated herein by this general reference as though fully set forth herein. Exhibit A (Scope of Services), Exhibit B (Special Requirements), Exhibit C (Schedule of Compensation), and Exhibit D (Schedule of Performance) also constitute a part of this Agreement and are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. Except as set forth in Section 1.10 regarding Exhibit B, this Agreement controls over the Contract Documents and the provisions in Exhibits A, B and C.

1.3 Compliance with Law.

Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of City and any Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered, and shall render all Services hereunder in accordance therewith.

1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments.

Consultant shall obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement, at its sole cost and expense, all necessary licenses, permits, certificates and approvals required by law for the performance of Services under this Agreement, including a City business license. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for all fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and which arise from or are necessary for Consultant’s performance of the Services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents, against all such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder.

1.5 Familiarity with Services.

By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant: (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the Scope of Services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how the Services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities and any difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the Services under this Agreement. If the Services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions existing therein, prior to commencement of Services hereunder. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the Services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer (defined in Section 1.12. A).

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 721
-3- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc

1.6 Prevention of Loss and Damages.

Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the Term (defined in Section 3.4) to furnish continuous protection to the work product, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the Services by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City’s own negligence.

1.7 Further Responsibilities of Parties.

Both Parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both Parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonable necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither Party shall be responsible to perform the Services of the other.

1.8 Additional Services.

City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the Services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra services beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or to make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from the Services. No such extra services may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer to Consultant, which written order incorporates therein an adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum (as defined in Section

2.1), and/or (ii) the Schedule of Performance, (as defined in Section 3.2), and which written order is approved in writing by Consultant. Any increase in compensation of up to five percent (5%) of the Contract Sum, or $25,000, whichever is less; or in the Schedule of Performance of up to one hundred eighty (180) days may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively, must be approved by City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to Services which are specifically set forth in the Scope of Services or which are reasonably contemplated therein. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the Services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor.

1.9 Facilities and Equipment.

Except as otherwise provided, Consultant shall, at its own cost and expense, provide all facilities and equipment necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement. City shall make available to Consultant only physical facilities such as desks, filing cabinets, and conference space (“City Facilities”), as City deems, in its sole discretion, to be reasonably necessary for Consultant’s use while consulting with City employees and reviewing records and the information in possession of City. The location, quality, and time of furnishing City Facilities shall be in the sole discretion of City. In no event shall City be required to furnish any facilities that may involve incurring any direct expense, including but not limited to a computer, long distance telephone, network data, internet or other communication charges, vehicles and reproduction facilities.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 722
-4- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc

1.10 Special Requirements.

Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the “Special Requirements” attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit B and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit B shall govern.

1.11 Corrections.

In addition to the indemnification obligations set forth in Article 4, and Sections 1.4, 1.13,

5.3, 5.4, and 6.3, Consultant shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the Services which may be disclosed during City’s review of Consultant’s report or plans. Should Consultant fail to make such correction(s) in a reasonably timely manner, such correction(s) may be made by City, and the cost thereof shall be charged to Consultant. In addition to all other available remedies, City may deduct the cost of such correction(s) from any retention amount held by City, or may withhold payment otherwise owed Consultant under this Agreement up to the amount of the cost of correction(s), as provided in Section 6.3.

1.12 Party Representatives.

A. Contract Officer: For the purposes of this Agreement, the Contract Officer shall be the City Manager, or such other person designated in writing by the City Manager (“Contract Officer”). Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager, to sign all documents on behalf of City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement.

B. Principals and Personnel of Consultant.
1) Consultant Representative: The following principal of Consultant is hereby designated as being the Consultant Representative authorized to act on Consultant’s behalf regarding the Services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith:

Name Title
Dilesh Sheth Vice President
It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing Consultant Representative were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing Consultant Representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the Services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the Consultant Representative. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing Consultant Representative may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced or reassigned by Consultant without the express written approval of City. It shall be Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the Services, and Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 723
-5- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
2) Consultant’s Personnel: Consultant has, or will secure at its own expense, all personnel required to perform the Services required under this Agreement. All of the Services required under this Agreement shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision, and all personnel engaged in the Services shall be qualified to perform such Services. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant’s staff and sub-contractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services required under this Agreement.

Consultant shall notify City of all changes in Consultant’s staff and sub-contractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance. In the event that City, in its sole discretion, at any time during the term of this Agreement, desires to reassign any staff or sub-contractor of Consultant, City shall give notice as set forth in Section 8.1. Consultant shall, immediately upon the receipt of the notice to re-assign staff from City, reassign such person or persons.

1.13 Independent Contractor.

A. Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee of City.

Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City. All Services provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods, and details of performing the Services. Any additional personnel performing Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance.

B. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Consultant’s personnel practices. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant’s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section.

1.14 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment.

The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, the Consultant Representative and employees were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement.

Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the Services required hereunder without the express written approval of City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 724
-6- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shall release Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City.

ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.

2.1 Contract Sum.

Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, as full compensation for Services satisfactorily rendered, City shall pay Consultant at the hourly rates set forth in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference. In no event shall Consultant be paid more than $ 548,416.05 (the “Contract Sum”). The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by City. Coordination of the performance of the Services with City is a critical component of the Services. If Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending those meetings.

2.2 Method of Compensation.

The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion of the Services, (ii) payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the Services, (iii) payment for time and materials based upon Consultant’s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, provided that time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, but not exceeding the Contract Sum or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation.

2.3 Reimbursable Expenses.

City shall only reimburse Consultant for those actual and necessary expenses expressly set forth in Exhibit C. Reimbursable expenses may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in advance, or actual sub-contractor expenses of an approved sub-contractor pursuant to Section 1.14, and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation.

2.4 Unauthorized Services and Expenses.

City will not pay for any Services or reimburse for any expenses incurred which are not specified in the Scope of Services, unless authorized in writing as set forth in Section 1.8 of this Agreement. City shall make payment for such authorized additional Services and expenses in accordance with Article 2 of this Agreement.

2.5 Invoices.

Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all Services performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month. Each such invoice shall contain all of the information set forth in Section IV of Exhibit C to this Agreement. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of the Agreement. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate Services performed by more than one person.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 725
-7- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
City shall independently review each invoice submitted by Consultant to determine whether the Services performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within thirty (30) days of receipt of Consultant’s correct and undisputed invoice, except as to any charges for Services performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 6.3. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City of any invoice provided by Consultant shall not constitute waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law.

2.6 Waiver.

Payment to Consultant for Services performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in Services performed by Consultant.

ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE

3.1 Time of Essence.

Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not be construed to limit or deprive a Party of the benefits of any grace or use period allowed in this Agreement.

3.2 Schedule of Performance.

Consultant shall commence the Services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all Services within the time period(s) established in the “Schedule of Performance” attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by this reference.

3.3 Force Majeure.

The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement may be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Consultant. Such unforeseeable consequences include, but are not restricted to, acts of God or public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including City, if Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the Services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified, subject to the provisions of Section 1.8. The Contract Officer’s determination (or the City Council’s determination, in the event the period of enforced delay exceeds the period specified in Section

1.8) shall be final and conclusive upon the Parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused; Consultant’s sole remedy shall be the extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 726
-8- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc

3.4 Term.

The Term of this Agreement shall be from the Effective Date through October 3, 2022, unless sooner terminated as provided in Article 6 of this Agreement or extended as provided in Sections 1.8 and 3.3 of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 4. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

4.1 Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance.

Consultant shall procure and at all times during the term of this Agreement carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect, insurance as follows:

A. Commercial General Liability Insurance with a minimum limit of $1,000,000.00 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage and a general aggregate limit of $2,000,000.00 per project or location. If Consultant is a limited liability company, the commercial general liability coverage shall be amended so that Consultant and its managers, members, affiliates, employees, agents and other persons necessary or incidental to its operation are insureds.

B. Automobile Liability Insurance for any owned, non-owned or hired vehicle used in connection with the performance of this Agreement with a combined single limit of $1,000,000.00 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. If Consultant does not use any owned, non-owned or hired vehicles in the performance of Services under this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain a non-owned auto endorsement to the Commercial General Liability policy.

C. Workers’ Compensation Insurance as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance with a minimum limit of $1,000,000.00 per accident for bodily injury or disease. If Consultant has no employees while performing Services under this Agreement, workers’ compensation policy is not required; however, Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees.

D. Professional Liability/Errors and Omissions Insurance with minimum limits of $1,000,000.00 per claim and in the aggregate.

4.2 Acceptability of Insurers.

The insurance policies required under this Article shall be issued by an insurer admitted to write insurance in the State of California with a rating of A:VII or better in the latest DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 727
-9- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
edition of the A.M. Best Insurance Rating Guide. Self-insurance shall not be considered to comply with the insurance requirements under this Article.

4.3 Additional Insured.

The commercial general and automobile liability policies shall contain an endorsement naming City, its officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds.

4.4 Primary and Non-Contributing.

The insurance policies required under this Article shall apply on a primary noncontributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance available to City. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its officers, employees, agents or volunteers, shall be in excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

4.5 Consultant’s Waiver of Subrogation.

The insurance policies required under this Article shall not prohibit Consultant and Consultant’s employees, agents or sub-contractors from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives all rights of subrogation against City.

4.6 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions.

Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At City’s option, Consultant shall either reduce or eliminate the deductibles or self-insured retentions with respect to City; or Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and expenses.

4.7 Cancellations or Modifications to Coverage.

Consultant shall not cancel, reduce or otherwise modify the insurance policies required by this Article during the term of this Agreement. The commercial general and automobile liability policies required under this Agreement shall be endorsed to state that should the issuing insurer cancel the policy before the expiration date, the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail 30 days’ prior written notice to City. If any insurance policy required under this Article is canceled or reduced in coverage or limits, Consultant shall, within two (2) Business Days (as defined in Section 8.12) of notice from the insurer, phone, fax or notify City via certified mail, return receipt requested, of the cancellation of or changes to the policy.

4.8 City Remedy for Noncompliance.

If Consultant does not maintain the policies of insurance required under this Article in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement, or in the event any of Consultant’s policies do not comply with the requirements under this Article, City may either immediately terminate this Agreement or, if insurance is available at a reasonable cost, City may, but has no duty to, take out the necessary insurance and pay, at Consultant’s expense, the premium thereon.

Consultant shall promptly reimburse City for any premium paid by City, or City may withhold amounts sufficient to pay the premiums from payments due to Consultant.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 728
-10- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc

4.9 Evidence of Insurance.

Prior to the performance of Services under this Agreement, Consultant shall furnish the City Clerk with a certificate or certificates of insurance and all original endorsements evidencing and effecting the coverages required under this Article. The endorsements are subject to City’s approval. Consultant may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies to City. Consultant shall maintain current endorsements on file with the City Clerk.

Consultant shall provide proof to the City Clerk that insurance policies expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Consultant shall furnish such proof at least two (2) weeks prior to the expiration of the coverages.

4.10 Indemnity Requirements not Limiting.

Procurement of insurance by Consultant shall not be construed as a limitation of Consultant’s liability or as full performance of Consultant’s duty to indemnify City under this Agreement.

4.11 Sub-contractor Insurance Requirements.

Consultant shall require each of its sub-contractors that perform Services under this Agreement to maintain insurance coverage that meets all of the requirements of this Article.

4.12 Indemnification, Hold Harmless, and Duty to Defend.

A. Indemnification of City.
1) Indemnity for Design Professional Services. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, protect, indemnify, and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers, attorneys, agents, employees, designated volunteers, successors, assigns and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”), from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, judgments, penalties, liens, and losses of any nature whatsoever, including fees of accountants, attorneys, or other professionals and all costs associated therewith, and reimbursement of attorney’s fees and costs of defense (collectively “Liabilities”), whether actual, alleged or threatened, which arise out of, are claimed to arise out of, pertain to, or relate to, in whole or in part, the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, material men, contractors or their officers, agents, servants or employees (or any entity or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of design professional services under this Agreement by a “design professional,” as the term is defined under California Civil Code Section 2782.8(c). 2) Other Indemnities. Other than in the performance of design professional services, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, defend, hold harmless and indemnify Indemnitees from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, proceedings, expenses, judgments, penalties, liens, and losses of any nature whatsoever, including fees of accountants, attorneys, or other professionals and all costs associated therewith and the payment of all consequential DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 729
-11- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
damages (collectively “Claims”), at law or in equity, whether actual, alleged or threatened, which arise out of, are claimed to arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts or omissions of Consultant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, sub-contractors, materialmen, consultants or their officers, agents, servants or employees (or any entity or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of this Agreement, including the Indemnitees’ active or passive negligence, except for Claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees as determined by court decision or by the agreement of the Parties. Consultant shall defend the Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any Claims with counsel of the Indemnitees’ choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all attorneys’ fees and experts’ costs actually incurred in connection with such defense. Consultant shall reimburse the Indemnitees for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by Indemnitees in connection therewith.
3) Consultant shall pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Consultant under this Agreement, and indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Consultant shall fully comply with the workers’ compensation law regarding Consultant and Consultant’s employees. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Consultant to comply with applicable workers’ compensation laws.

City may offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant’s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this subparagraph A.3. 4) Consultant shall obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those in this Article from each and every sub-contractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. If Consultant fails to obtain such indemnities, Consultant shall be fully responsible and indemnify, hold harmless and defend the Indemnitees from and against any and all Liabilities and Claims, in law or in equity, whether actual, alleged or threatened, which arise out of, are claimed to arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts or omissions of Consultant’s sub-contractor, its officers, agents, servants, employees, sub-contractors, materialmen, contractors or their officers, agents, servants or employees (or any entity or individual that Consultant’s sub-contractor shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of this Agreement, including the Indemnitees’ active or passive negligence, except for Liabilities and Claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees, as determined by court decision or by the agreement of the Parties.

B. Workers’ Compensation Acts not Limiting. Consultant’s indemnifications and obligations under this Article, or any other provision of this Agreement, shall not be limited by the provisions of any workers’ compensation act or similar act. Consultant expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statutes or laws as to City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers.

C. Insurance Requirements not Limiting. City does not, and shall not, waive any rights that it may possess against Consultant because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. The indemnities in this Article shall apply regardless of whether or not any insurance policies are determined to be applicable to the Liabilities, tax, assessment, penalty or interest asserted against City.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 730
-12- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
D. Survival of Terms. Consultant’s indemnifications and obligations under this Article shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 5. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION

5.1 Service Records.

Consultant shall keep, and require sub-contractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and Services performed hereunder (the “Service Records”), as shall be necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such Services. Any and all such Service Records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such Service Records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make copies and transcripts from such Service Records. Such Service Records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the Services hereunder, and City shall have access to such Service Records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant’s business, custody of the Service Records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Consultant’s successor in interest (“Consultant’s Successor”). If custody of the Service Records is given to Consultant’s Successor, Consultant shall give written notice to City of the transfer of the Service Records to Consultant’s Successor. The notice shall include contact information (address and telephone number) for Consultant’s Successor, and access shall be provided to City by Consultant’s Successor.

5.2 Reports.

Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the Services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that City is greatly concerned about the cost of Services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the Services contemplated herein, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of that fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto.

5.3 Ownership of Documents.

All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the “Consultant Documents”) prepared by Consultant, its employees, sub-contractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the Consultant Documents hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed Consultant Documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted Consultant Documents without specific written authorization by Consultant will be at City’s sole DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 731
-13- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use or assignment. Consultant may retain copies of such Consultant Documents for its own use. Consultant shall have an unrestricted right to use the concepts embodied therein. All sub-contractors shall provide for assignment to City of all Consultant Documents prepared by them; and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom.

5.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information.

A. All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer.

B. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or sub-contractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the Services performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.

C. If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or sub-contractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorneys’ fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct.

D. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or sub-contractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any Party regarding this Agreement and the Services performed thereunder. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite the response.

ARTICLE 6. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION

6.1 California Law.

This Agreement, and any dispute arising from the relationship between the Parties to this Agreement, shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the Parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 732
-14- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in Riverside.

6.2 Disputes; Default.

A. In the event that City determines Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any Services performed after the date of default. In addition to the provisions of Section 4.8, and the right to terminate pursuant to Section 6.7, if the City Manager determines that Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, City may serve Consultant with written notice of the default. Consultant shall have ten (10) calendar days after service upon it of the notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance.

In the event that Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, City may, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.

B. In the event of termination pursuant to this Section, City may take over the Services and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the Services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed City as provided in Section 6.3.

6.3 Retention of Funds.

Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement): (i) any payment amount of which may be in dispute hereunder or which is necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, (ii) all amounts retained pursuant to the provisions of Section 4.8, (iii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant’s obligation under this Agreement, and (iv) all payments due or that become due to Consultant during the period that Consultant or any of its sub-contractors fail to maintain any required insurance in full force and effect, until notice is received by City that the required insurance has been restored to full force and effect and that the premiums therefore have been paid for a period satisfactory to City, as provided in Section 4.9, above. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.

6.4 Waiver.

Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 733
-15- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement.

Acceptance by City of any Services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting Party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.

Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing, and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.

6.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative.

Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other Party.

6.6 Legal Action.

In addition to any other rights or remedies, either Party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Consultant must file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections 905 et seq. and 910 et seq., in order to pursue a legal action against City under this Agreement.

6.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term.

This Article 6 shall govern any termination of this Agreement except as specifically provided in Section 6.2 for termination for default of Consultant. City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Consultant, except that where termination is due to the fault of Consultant, the period of notice may be a shorter time as may be determined by the Contract Officer. In addition, Consultant reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon sixty (60) days’ written notice to City, except that where termination is due to the fault of City, the period of notice may be a shorter time as Consultant may determine. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all Services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Except where Consultant has initiated termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all Services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any Services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 6.3. In the event Consultant has initiated termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced hereunder. In the event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the terminating Party need not provide the non-terminating Party with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 6.2.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 734
-16- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc

6.8 Attorneys’ Fees.

In any litigation or other proceeding by which a Party seeks to enforce its rights under this Agreement (whether in contract, tort or both) or seeks a declaration of any rights or obligations under this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees. Attorneys’ fees shall include attorney’s fees on any appeal, and in addition the Party entitled to attorneys’ fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment.

ARTICLE 7. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION

7.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees.

No officer or employee of City shall be personally liable to Consultant, or Consultant’s Successor, in the event of any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Consultant or Consultant’s Successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.

7.2 Conflict of Interest.

Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or sub-contractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement.

No officer or employee of City shall have any direct or indirect financial interest in this Agreement within the scope of Government Code section 1090, nor shall any such officer or employee make, participate in making, or use his or her official position to influence, any City decision relating to the Agreement which has a material financial effect on his or her financial interests or the financial interests of any corporation, partnership or association in which he or she is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.

Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and sub-contractors, if any, shall comply with all conflict of interest statutes of the State of California applicable to Consultant’s Services under this Agreement, including the Political Reform Act (Gov. Code § 81000, et seq.) and Government Code Section 1090. During the term of this Agreement, Consultant may perform similar services for other clients; but Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and subcontractors shall not, without the Contract Officer’s prior written approval, perform services for another person or entity for whom Consultant is not currently performing services that would DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 735
-17- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
require Consultant or one of its officers, employees, associates or sub-contractors to abstain from a decision under this Agreement pursuant to a conflict of interest statute. Consultant shall incorporate a clause substantially similar to this Section into any subcontract that Consultant executes in connection with the performance of this Agreement.

7.3 Covenant Against Discrimination.

Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement.

Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, or ancestry, or other protected class.

7.4 Unauthorized Aliens.

Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of Services covered by this Agreement, and should the any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by City.

ARTICLE 8. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

8.1 Notices.

Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, bill, invoice, report or other communication required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and conclusively deemed effective: (a) on confirmed delivery by courier service or overnight delivery service during Consultant’s and City’s regular business hours; or (b) three (3) Business Days after deposit in the United States mail, by certified or registered mail, and addressed to the Party to be notified as set forth below:

If to City Attn: Patrick Safari
Associate Engineer
City of Banning
99 East Ramsey Street
Banning, California 90220
Email: [email protected]
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 736
-18- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
With a courtesy copy to: Kevin G. Ennis, City Attorney
Richards, Watson & Gershon
355 South Grand Avenue, 40th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
Email: [email protected]
If to Consultant: Dilesh Sheth
Vice President
Albert A. Webb Associates
3788 McCray Street
Riverside, CA 92506
Email: [email protected]

8.2 Interpretation.

The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either Party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

8.3 Counterparts.

This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument.

8.4 Integration; Amendment.

This Agreement, and all exhibits referred to in this Agreement, constitute the final, complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement between the Parties pertaining to the subject matter of this Agreement and supersede all other and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the Parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No Party has been induced to enter into this Agreement by, nor is any Party relying on, any representation or warranty except those expressly set forth in this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by Consultant and by City Council. The Parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void.

8.5 Severability.

In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the Parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either Party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 737
-19- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc

8.6 Mutual Cooperation.

A. City’s Cooperation. City shall provide Consultant with all pertinent data, documents and other requested information as is reasonably available for Consultant’s proper performance of the Services required under this Agreement.

B. Consultant’s Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to Consultant’s performance of Services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance that City requires.

8.7 No Third Party Beneficiaries Intended.

This Agreement is made solely for the benefit of the Parties to this Agreement and their respective successors and assigns, and no other person or entity may have or acquire a right by virtue of this Agreement.

8.8 Final Payment Acceptance Constitutes Release.

The acceptance by Consultant of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of City from all claims and liabilities for compensation to Consultant for anything done, furnished or relating to Consultant’s Services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of City’s check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten (10) calendar days of the receipt of that check. However, approval or payment by City shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of Consultant, its employees, sub-contractors and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or Services performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by City for any defect or error in the Services prepared by Consultant, its employees, sub-contractors and agents.

8.9 Non-Appropriation of Funds.

Payments to be made to Consultant by City for Services performed within the current fiscal year which are within the current fiscal budget and within an available, unexhausted fund. In the event that City does not appropriate sufficient funds for payment of Consultant’s Services beyond the current fiscal year, this Agreement shall cover payment for Consultant’s Services only to the conclusion of the last fiscal year in which City appropriates sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at the conclusion of such fiscal year.

8.10 Headings.

The headings in this Agreement are included solely for convenience of reference and shall not affect the interpretation of any provision of this Agreement or any of the rights or obligations of the Parties to this Agreement.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 738
-20- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc

8.11 Word Usage.

Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, (a) the words “shall,” “will” and “agrees” are mandatory and “may” is permissive; (b) “or” is not exclusive; and (c) “includes” or “including” are not limiting.

8.12 Business Days.
“Business Days” refers to days that the Banning City Hall is open for business.

8.13 Corporate Authority.

The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties hereto warrant that (i): such Party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of that Party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such Party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which that Party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 739
-21- 11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first hereinabove written.

CITY OF BANNING CONSULTANT
Douglas Schulze, Date
City Manager
NAME: Date
TITLE:

NAME: Date
TITLE:

ATTEST:

Tax ID No.

Sonja De La Fuente Date
Deputy City Clerk
Address:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Richards, Watson & Gershon
City Council Approval: 04/14/2020
Kevin G. Ennis, Esq., Date
City Attorney
NOTE: PROOF OF AUTHORITY TO BIND CONTRACTING PARTY REQUIRED. APPROPRIATE

ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 Dilesh Sheth
Vice President
3788 McCray Street, Riverside, Ca 92506
6/23/2020
95-1723730
6/23/2020
6/23/2020
6/23/2020
740
Exhibit “A”-1
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. Consultant will perform the following Services in connection with providing design of Sun Lakes Boulevard extension prepared in connection therewith:

I. As part of the Services, Consultant will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products to City:

A. Consultant shall provide services necessary to provide a complete (construction ready) project.

Task 1. Project Management
The consultant shall attend regular status meetings with the City throughout the duration of the project as well as prepare monthly progress reports. The consultant shall develop and maintain a detailed work program and schedule the development of a project specific Work Plan. The Work Plan will include, at a minimum, details of methodology, sequence of tasks, lists of deliverables, milestone submittal schedule, summary of organizational responsibilities and contacts, as well as reporting and invoicing procedures. The consultant will meet face to face with the Project Design Team (PDT) monthly. The consultant will be responsible to facilitate other meetings as necessary with City Departments and other key stakeholders, creating meeting agendas with input from the City and prepare and distribute meeting minutes.

Deliverables: Work Plan, Monthly Progress Reports, Meeting Agendas and Meeting Minutes.

Task 2. Project Development

2.1 Data Collection and Site Reconnaissance
Consultant shall collect and review available existing reports, data, as-built plans, and information relevant to the project from the City, County and any other agency necessary to complete the work, including assessor’s information and any utilities that exist in the area. Consultant shall conduct a field investigation to familiarize the project team with the drainage conditions, flow patterns, existing design constraints and existing/ongoing improvements in the project area.

Deliverables: Field Review Notes, Photo Logs, Copies of Existing Data

2.2 Survey and Aerial Topographic Mapping
Consultant shall research available record information pertaining to the project including: Tract Maps, Records of Survey, Parcel Maps and Right-of-Way Maps.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 741
Exhibit “A”-2
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
Consultant shall provide topographical mapping at 1-foot contour intervals and field surveying to identify existing topographical features. Tie out any and all survey monuments that may be disturbed by the work. Establish street centerline and centerline stationing to an accuracy of one-tenth foot (0.10’). Establish temporary benchmarks required for the work and provide all elevations, dimensions and other measurements necessary to establish proper line and grade.

Deliverables: AutoCAD drawing file of the survey points

2.3 Utility Research and Base Mapping
Consultant shall act on behalf of the City of Banning and contact all utility purveyors to determine if existing facilities are present in the area. Utility data shall be base mapped and include appropriate identification by their respective owner, location and size.

2.4 Public Outreach
Due to the number of residences and existing developments located adjacent to the project site, the Consultant shall include the necessary public outreach. At a minimum, this shall be conducted in an “Open house” fashion to give the adjacent neighbors a chance to learn about the project and note any potential concerns.

Deliverables: Letters to Utility Owners, Utility As-Built Maps, Utility Base Map Task 3. Preliminary Engineering Design

3.1 Roadway Geometric Approval Drawings (GAD’s)
Consultant shall analyze and prepare a proposed alignment consistent with the existing right-of-way and in accordance with the Caltrans Highway Design Manual for geometric features. It is anticipated that right-of-way will not be required as a part of this project; however, construction easements, slope easements, etc. may still be required. The GAD shall include typical cross sections as well as the identification of existing rights-of-way and property lines to determine any need for right-of-way or easements.

Deliverables: Geometric Approval Drawings (30% Complete Plans), Preliminary Cost Estimate, Preliminary Right-of-Way Requirements Map

3.2 Preliminary Roadway Drainage Plans
Consultant shall prepare drainage design for the proposed improvements in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) design standards. The consultant shall review any available hydrology reports and prepare necessary analysis in accordance with RCFC&WCD DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 742
Exhibit “A”-3
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
as well as City requirements to determine the amount of drainage tributary to the project area and to review the capacity of existing drainage facilities. Consultant shall review public agency’s available hydrology/hydraulic and storm drain plan records for existing drainage facilities within and adjacent to the project site.

Existing drainage patterns and runoff tributary areas to the site shall be determined.

Consultant shall perform necessary analysis to determine hydraulic function and size of necessary facilities.

Deliverables: Drainage Design Report, 30% Drainage Plans (shown on the GAD) Task 4. Environmental Documentation
Consultant shall identify environmental impacts under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) if necessary.

Environmental services shall include identification and preparation of an Initial Study Assessment, technical studies and environmental document for City review and approval as necessary for CEQA clearance. The City currently anticipates an IS/MND as the appropriate CEQA document for the project. The Consultant shall evaluate the City’s recommendation and determine if the IS/MND is the appropriate document for this project. Based on this assumption, the proposal should include timing and cost breakdowns for the initial assessment, as well as costs associated with potential focused surveys. At a minimum, the consultant shall address:

4.1 Traffic Impact Analysis
Consultant shall prepare a TIA for the proposed improvements for CEQA documentation. The study will address the changes in traffic volumes and patterns in the immediate vicinity. At a minimum, the study shall look at adjacent intersections to determine if traffic controls (stop control, traffic signals, etc.) are required. The consultant shall assume that Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis will be required in conformance with SB 743.

4.2 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas
These studies will be used in the CEQA review. The studies should include a written report (with photos of the site) discussing air quality and greenhouse gas impacts.

4.3 Biological Study
Based on the recent Negative Declaration for the modification to the City’s General Plan Circulation Element, at a minimum this shall include a burrowing owl survey and Los Angeles Pocket Mouse Survey. An MSHCP consistency analysis will need to be completed as a part of this study. The necessary habitat assessments shall include written reports (with photos of the site) indicating whether or not the site contains suitable habitat.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 743
Exhibit “A”-4
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc

4.4 Cultural Study and Paleontological Resources Report The Cultural Study and Paleontological Resources Report should include a written report following the guidelines for Archaeological Resource Management Reports prepared by the California Office of Historical Preservation, Preservation Planning Bulletin 4(a), December 1989. AB52 compliance shall also be included in the scope of services.

4.5 Noise Study
The Noise Study shall include a written report (with photos of the site) identifying short- and long-term noise impacts, and any mitigation measures required to reduce these impacts to less than significant. Deliverables: CEQA IS/MND, Responses to Comments, Copies of Studies, Correspondence.

Task 5. Final Design Reports and Studies
Consultant shall provide final Design Reports and Studies necessary to complete the project. The following recommendations may be necessary:

5.1 Utility Coordination
Review and verification of facilities that may be in conflict based on results of potholing; relocation of any existing utilities determined to be in conflict; liability for all utility conflicts; agreements as necessary; issuance of notices to relocate as necessary.

5.2 Geotechnical Design Report
Structural conditions and recommendations that may include over excavation and recompaction areas or surcharges; all necessary analysis for proper design of the project objectives, R-values of subgrade material and the structural section of the roadway using the latest traffic index.

5.3 Supplemental Design Surveys
Provide potholing map as necessary for utility surveying in the field; establish potholing location and record elevations of any utilities located.

5.4 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
In compliance with National Pollution Discharge Elimination system (NPDES) requirements as well as Construction General Permits; address project’s risk level; provide Notice of Intent (NOI) and assist with uploading NOI & SWPPP into the “SMARTs” system.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 744
Exhibit “A”-5
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
Deliverables: Utility Correspondences (i.e. Relocation Claim Letters, Agreements, Notice to Relocate, etc.), Final Studies/Reports.

Task 6. Final Design Plans, Specifications and Estimates Consultant shall prepare a complete set of improvement plans compatible with AutoCAD 2019. PS&E submittals will be required at the 60%, 90% and 100% design intervals. The plans shall include a cover sheet with all sheets using the City title block and prepared in accordance with the regulations and standards of the City of Banning. At a minimum, the plans shall include the following new, modification or relocation of existing improvements:
· Street Improvements
· Grading
· Easement Documents
· Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter
· Retaining Walls and/or Structures
· Storm Drain
· Landscape & Irrigation
· Signing & Striping
· Erosion Control and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (if necessary) · Construction Options, Phasing and Detour Plans
· Street Lighting, Traffic Signals and Modifications
· Utilities
· Intersecting Street Designs
· Driveway Approaches
· Record of Existing Survey Monuments
· Other Related Work
Consultant shall address all plan check comments, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Final Plans shall be submitted on 24” X 36” mylars Deliverables: 60%, 90%, 100% PS&E Submittals, Final PS&E, Electronic Versions of each Submittal.

Task 7. Permitting
Consultant shall investigate and process all required permits if necessary, including, but not limited to the following: Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District, National Pollution Discharge Elimination System, U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, State of California Water Resources Control Board, and Regional Conservation Authority.

Deliverables: Correspondence with Various Agencies, Permit Applications and Final Permits
Task 8. Bidding/Construction Support
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 745
Exhibit “A”-6
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
Consultant shall be available during the advertisement and construction of the project to answer RFI’s as well as prepare necessary addenda. The consultant shall plan to attend, at a minimum, the following meetings: pre-bid meeting and preconstruction meeting. The Consultant shall review shop drawings and submittals from the contractor for conformance with the contract plans and specifications, and make recommendations for acceptance, denial or re-submittal within reasonable time of receipt. Upon written authorization from the City, consultant shall provide engineering design services for revisions to construction documents resulting from changed or unforeseen conditions, or other change order work required due to actions of the City. The Consultant shall assume a minimum of eight (8) site visits during construction as requested by the City. Upon completion of the project, the consultant shall use information based on redlined information provided by the contractor and the City to prepare as-built plans. As-built plans shall be submitted to the City within one (1) month of receipt of as-built plans.

Deliverables: Meeting Attendance, Response to Bidder’s/Contractor’s RFIs, Design Addenda, Submittal Reviews, As-Built Plans
II. In addition to the requirements of Parts I and II of this Scope of Services, during the performance of the Services, Consultant will keep City appraised through periodic status reports regarding the performance of the Services under this Agreement as set forth below and in Section 5.2, by the following means:

A. In-person meetings or teleconference.

B. Email updates/questions to applicant team and City while reviews are underway.

C. Conference calls.

III. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by City, and must be revised by Consultant without additional charge to City until found satisfactory and accepted by City.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 746
Exhibit “B”-1
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
EXHIBIT “B”

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

TERMS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA LABOR LAW REQUIREMENTS

1. This Agreement calls for services that, in whole or in part, constitute “public works” as defined in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code (“Chapter 1”). Further, Consultant acknowledges that this Agreement is subject to (a) Chapter 1 and (b) the rules and regulations established by the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) implementing such statutes. Therefore, as to those Services that are “public works,” Consultant shall comply with and be bound by all the terms, rules and regulations described in 1(a) and 1(b) as though set forth in full herein.

2. California law requires the inclusion of specific Labor Code provisions in certain contracts. The inclusion of such specific provisions below, whether or not required by California law, does not alter the meaning or scope of Section 1 above.

3. Consultant shall be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations in accordance with California Labor Code Section 1725.5, and has provided proof of registration to City prior to the Effective Date of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform work with any subcontractor that is not registered with DIR pursuant to Section 1725.5. Consultant and subcontractors shall maintain their registration with the DIR in effect throughout the duration of this Agreement. If the Consultant or any subcontractor ceases to be registered with DIR at any time during the duration of the project, Consultant shall immediately notify City.

4. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4, Consultant’s Services are subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by DIR. Consultant shall post job site notices, as prescribed by DIR regulations.

5. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to perform the Agreement are on file at City Hall and will be made available to any interested party on request. Consultant acknowledges receipt of a copy of the DIR determination of such prevailing rate of per diem wages, and Consultant shall post such rates at each job site covered by this Agreement.

6. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1774 and 1775 concerning the payment of prevailing rates of wages to workers and the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages. The Consultant shall, as a penalty to City, forfeit $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates as determined by the DIR for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done pursuant to this Agreement by Consultant or by any subcontractor.

7. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1776, which requires Consultant and each subcontractor to: keep accurate payroll records and verify such records in writing under penalty of perjury, as specified in Section 1776; certify and make such payroll records available for inspection as provided by Section 1776; and inform City of the location of the records.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 747
Exhibit “B”-2
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc

8. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 and California Administrative Code Title 8, Section 200 et seq. concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects. Consultant shall be responsible for compliance with these aforementioned Sections for all apprenticeable occupations.

Prior to commencing work under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide City with a copy of the information submitted to any applicable apprenticeship program. Within 60 days after concluding work pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant and each of its subcontractors shall submit to City a verified statement of the journeyman and apprentice hours performed under this Agreement.

9. The Consultant shall not perform Work with any Subcontractor that has been debarred or suspended pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1777.1 or any other federal or state law providing for the debarment of contractors from public works. The Consultant and Subcontractors shall not be debarred or suspended throughout the duration of this Agreement pursuant to Labor Code Section 1777.1 or any other federal or state law providing for the debarment of contractors from public works. If the Consultant or any subcontractor becomes debarred or suspended during the duration of the project, the Consultant shall immediately notify City.

10. Consultant acknowledges that eight hours labor constitutes a legal day’s work.

Consultant shall comply with and be bound by Labor Code Section 1810. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess hours. The Consultant shall, as a penalty to City, forfeit $25.00 for each worker employed in the performance of this Agreement by the Consultant or by any subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than eight hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to Labor Code section 1815, work performed by employees of Consultant in excess of eight hours per day, and 40 hours during any one week shall be permitted upon public work upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of eight hours per day at not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay.

11. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700 provide that every employer will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1861, Consultant hereby certifies as follows:
“I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.”
Date______________ Signature___________________________ DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 6/23/2020
748
Exhibit “B”-3
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc

12. For every subcontractor who will perform work on the project, Consultant shall be responsible for such subcontractor’s compliance with Chapter 1 and Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700, and Consultant shall include in the written contract between it and each subcontractor a copy of those statutory provisions and a requirement that each subcontractor shall comply with those statutory provisions. Consultant shall be required to take all actions necessary to enforce such contractual provisions and ensure subcontractor’s compliance, including, without limitation, conducting a periodic review of the certified payroll records of the subcontractor and upon becoming aware of the failure of the subcontractor to pay his or her workers the specified prevailing rate of wages. Consultant shall diligently take corrective action to halt or rectify any failure.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 749
Exhibit “C”-1
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
EXHIBIT “C”

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
I. Consultant shall perform the following tasks (“Tasks”) at the following rates.

TASK DESCRIPTION SUB-BUDGET

1. Project Management $19,970

2. Project Development $26,206

3. Preliminary Engineering Design $76,154

4. Environmental Documentation $159,470

5. Final Design Report and Studies $67,250

6. Final Design, Specifications and Estimates $183,236

7. Permitting $11,130

8. Bidding/Construction Support $5,000
TOTAL $548,416.05
II. Within the budgeted amounts for each Task, and with the approval of the Contract Officer, funds may be shifted from one Task sub-budget to another so long as the Contract Sum is not exceeded per Section 2.1, unless Additional Services are approved per Section 1.8.

III. City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include:

A. Line items for all personnel describing the Services performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate.

B. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services.

C. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation.

D. Line items for all approved sub-contractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services.

IV. The total compensation for Services shall not exceed $548,416.05 as provided in Section 2.1 of this Agreement.

V. Consultant’s billing rates for all personnel are attached as Exhibit C-1.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 750
Exhibit “D”- 1
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
EXHIBIT “D”

SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
I. Consultant shall perform all Services timely, and deliver the specified tangible work products to City in accordance with the schedule attached as Exhibit D-1.

II. The Contract Officer may approve extensions for performance of the Services in accordance with Sections 1.8 and 3.3.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 751
Exhibit “D-1”- 1
11303-0008\2431284v2.doc
EXHIBIT “D-1”

PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 752
5 Section D. Project Schedule
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors
1 Contract Award 0 days Mon 6/1/20 Mon 6/1/20
2 Project Kick‐Off Meeting 0 days Mon 6/1/20 Mon 6/1/20 1 3 Task 1 ‐ Project Management 550 days Mon 6/1/20 Fri 7/8/22 4 1.1 ‐ Coordination and Meetings (Prepare Agendas and Minutes) 550 days Mon 6/1/20 Fri 7/8/22 2 5 1.2 ‐ Prepare Monthly Progress Reports and Work Plans 550 days Mon 6/1/20 Fri 7/8/22 2 6 1.3 ‐ Coordination with Stakeholders and Agencies 300 days Mon 8/31/20 Fri 10/22/21 2 7 Task 2 ‐ Project Development 120 days Mon 6/1/20 Fri 11/13/20 8 2.1 ‐ Data Collection and Site Reconnaissance 30 days Mon 6/1/20 Fri 7/10/20 2 9 2.2 ‐ Survey and Aerial Topographic Mapping 30 days Mon 7/13/20 Fri 8/21/20 8 10 2.3 ‐ Utility Research and Base Mapping 30 days Mon 7/13/20 Fri 8/21/20 8 11 2.4 ‐ Public Outreach 60 days Mon 8/24/20 Fri 11/13/20 10 12 Task 3 ‐ Prelinimary Engineering Design 90 days Mon 8/24/20 Fri 12/25/20 13 3.1 ‐ Roadway Geometric Approval Drawing (GAD) 90 days Mon 8/24/20 Fri 12/25/20 10 14 3.2 ‐ Preliminary Roadway Drainage Plans 90 days Mon 8/24/20 Fri 12/25/20 10 15 Task 4 ‐ Environmental Documentation 450 days Mon 5/4/20 Fri 1/21/22 16 4.1 ‐ Traffic Impact Analysis 180 days Mon 12/28/20 Fri 9/3/21 13 17 4.2 ‐ Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas 180 days Mon 12/28/20 Fri 9/3/21 13 18 4.3 ‐ Biological Study 325 days Mon 5/4/20 Fri 7/30/21 19 4.4 ‐ Cultural Study and Paleontological Report 65 days Mon 5/4/20 Fri 7/31/20 20 4.5 ‐ Noise Study 180 days Mon 12/28/20 Fri 9/3/21 13 21 4.6 ‐ CEQA Documentation 100 days Mon 9/6/21 Fri 1/21/22 16,17,18,19,20 22 Task 5 ‐ Final Design Reports and Studies 180 days Mon 6/1/20 Fri 2/5/21 23 5.1 ‐ Utility Coordination 30 days Mon 6/1/20 Fri 7/10/20 2 24 5.2 ‐ Supplemental Design Survey 30 days Mon 12/28/20 Fri 2/5/21 13 25 5.3 ‐ Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) 60 days Mon 8/24/20 Fri 11/13/20 10 26 Task 6 ‐ Final Design Plans, Specifications and Estimate 380 days Mon 12/28/20 Fri 6/10/22 27 Preparation of 60% Plans 120 days Mon 12/28/20 Fri 6/11/21 13 28 City Review of 60% Plans 30 days Mon 6/14/21 Fri 7/23/21 27 29 Preparation of 90% PS&E 90 days Mon 7/26/21 Fri 11/26/21 28 30 City Review of 90% PS&E 30 days Mon 11/29/21 Fri 1/7/22 29 31 Preparation of 100% PS&E 60 days Mon 1/10/22 Fri 4/1/22 30 32 City Review of 100% PS&E 30 days Mon 4/4/22 Fri 5/13/22 31 33 Approval of PS&E Package 20 days Mon 5/16/22 Fri 6/10/22 32 34 Task 7 ‐ Regulatory Permitting 180 days Mon 1/24/22 Fri 9/30/22 21 35 Task 8 ‐ Bidding / Construction Support 30 days Mon 10/3/22 Fri 11/11/22 34 6/1
6/1
May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Qtr 3, 2020 Qtr 1, 2021 Qtr 3, 2021 Qtr 1, 2022 Qtr 3, 2022 Sun Lakes Blvd. Extension in the City of Banning

Page 1 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4DAF5136-2889-41EC-86A1-358FD12631F3 753
RESOLUTION 2025- 116

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $ 59,600 FOR

ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING SERVICES FOR THE SUN LAKES BOULEVARD EXTENSION PROJECT.

WHEREAS, on April 14, 2020, under Resolution No. 2020- 48, the City Council approved the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for the design of Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension in the amount of $548,416. 05; and WHEREAS, on July 14, 2020, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020- 97, authorizing the City Manager to execute a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee ( TUMF) Reimbursement Agreement with Western Riverside Council of Government ( WRCOG) for up to $ 1,000, 000 in TUMF funds for the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension project; and WHEREAS, on February 11, 2022, a change order ( change order 1) to the Professional Services Agreement with WEBB was approved for out-of-scope work including coordination with Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority ( RCA) in the amount of $24,983.25; and
WHEREAS, on March 21, 2022, a change order ( change order 2) to the Professional Services Agreement with WEBB was approved for out-of-scope work including a sediment transport analysis in the amount of $5,974.88; and
WHEREAS, on October 11, 2022, City Council adopted Resolution 2022- 139 to rescind Resolution 2022- 106 and to amend the Professional Services Agreement with WEBB Amendment No. 1 ") to include additional compensation in the amount of $148,222 ( change order 3) and extend the term of the agreement to June 30, 2024. Amendment No. 1 was for out- ofscope work such as storm drain system design, environmental coordination with RCA, supplemental environmental documentation and jurisdictional delineation and permitting.

Amendment No. 1 increased the contract amount to $751, 947.66; and WHEREAS, on October 24, 2023, City Council adopted Resolution 2023- 175 to amend the Professional Services Agreement with WEBB (" Amendment No.2") to include additional compensation in the amount of $ 496,079 for continued design of the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension increasing the contract amount to $1,248,026. 66; and WHEREAS, On January 6, 2025, City staff amended the Professional Services Agreement with WEBB (" Amendment No.3") to extend the Term of Agreement to June 30, 2026; and
WHEREAS, On May 27, 2025, City Council adopted Resolution 2025- 70 to amend the Professional Services Agreement with WEBB (" Amendment No.4") to include additional compensation in the amount of $57,080 for environmental permitting related biological studies for the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension increasing the contract amount to $ 1,305,106.66; and Resolution 2025- 116

Page 1 of 5 ends

754
WHEREAS, the scope of work includes Incidental Take Permit ( ITP) application, Crotch' s Bumble Bee ( CBB) Habitat Assessment of Offsite Mitigation Site, UAV Drone Survey, WEBB meetings and coordination and updated street and storm drain plans; and WHEREAS, the scope of work change is essential to meet environmental mitigation requirements and to make sure that the project construction phase begins on time; and WHEREAS, Amendment No.5 will amend the Professional Services Agreement by adding an additional $ 59,600 to cover Change Order No.6; and
WHEREAS, an appropriation from the Measure A Fund in the amount of $ 59,600 to Account No. 101- 4900- 431. 93-16 is necessary to cover the change orders; and WHEREAS, the project is funded by the TUMF program up to $ 12,000,000, therefore the additional expenditure related to Amendment No. 5 will be reimbursed by the TUMF program.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council approves Amendment No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A Webb Associates, Inc. for an additional $ 59,600 for the Design of Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension.

SECTION 2. City Council authorizes the City Manager or designee to make necessary budget adjustments, appropriations and transfers related to Amendment No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A Webb Associates, Inc. for the Design of Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of August 2025.

ATTEST:

Sandra Calderon, Acting Administrative
City Clerk
City of Banning
Resolution 2025- 116

Page 2 of 5 ends

Sheri Flynn, Mayor -+
City of Banning
755
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Resolution 2025- 116

Page 3 of 5 ends

756
CERTIFICATION:

I, Sandra Calderon, Acting Administrative City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2025-116, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 26th day of August 2025 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Barrington, Flynn, Miller, Royce, Wallace
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Resolution 2025- 116

Page 4 of 5 ends

Sandra Calderon, Acting Administrative City
Clerk
City of Banning, California
757

EXHIBIT A
Amendment No.5 to the Professional Services Agreement with WEBB Resolution 2025- 116

Page 5 of 5 ends

758
AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
C00660) FOR THE DESIGN OF SUN LAKES BOULEVARD

EXTENSION BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF BANNING AND ALBERT
A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES (" Amendment No. 5") by and between the CITY OF BANNING (" City") and ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES, a California Corporation Consultant") is effective as of this day: _____ _

RECITALS
A. City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement for Professional Design Services dated June 23, 2020 (" Agreement") whereby Consultant agreed to provide Design Services for the Design of Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension following a Request for Proposals for an amount not to exceed Five- Hundred Forty- Eight Thousand Four Hundred Sixteen Dollars and Five Cents ($ 548, 416. 05). The agreement included a 10% Contingency of Fifty- Four Thousand Eight Hundred Forty One Dollars and Sixty- One Cents ($ 54, 841. 61) for a total contract amount of Six Hundred Three Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty- Five Dollars and Sixty- Six Cents ($ 603, 725. 66). The Term of the Agreement was to commence on June 23, 2020, and continue in full force and effect until October 3, 2022.

B. On February 11, 2022, Public Works Department approved a change order to the Professional Services Agreement with Albe1i A. Webb Associates, Inc. for out- ofscope work including coordination with Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority ( RCA) in the amount of $24, 983. 25, leaving a contingency balance of $29,858. 36.

C. On March 21, 2022, Public Works Department approved a change order to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for the preparation of a sediment transport analysis ( out of scope) in the amount of $5,974. 88, leaving a contingency balance of $23, 883. 48.

D. On August 23,2022 City Council adopted City Council Resolution 2022- 106 which authorized the increase in compensation for services provided under the Agreement by One Hundred Twenty- Nine Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($ 129, 400. 00).

E. On October 11, 2022, City Council Adopted City Council Resolution 2022- 139 to rescind Resolution 2022- 106 and amend the Agreement to include additional compensation in the amount of One Hundred Forty- Eight Thousand Two Hundred Twenty- Two Dollars ($ 148, 222. 00) for a new contract total of Seven Hundred FiftyOne Thousand Nine Hundred Forty- Seven Dollars and Sixty- Six Cents ($ 751, 947. 66) and to extend the term of the Agreement through June 30, 2024.

F. On October 23, 2023, City and Consultant amended the Agreement to modify the Scope of Services, extend the Term of the Agreement to June 30, 2025, and increase the Contract Sum by Four Hundred Ninety- Six Thousand Seventy- Nine Dollars 759
496, 079. 00) for a total not to exceed amount of One Million Two Hundred Forty- Eight Thousand Twenty- Six Dollars and Sixty- Six Cents ($ 1,248, 026. 66).

G. On January 6, 2025, City and Consultant amended the Agreement to extend the Term of the Agreement to June 30, 2026.

H. On May 27, 2025, City and Consultant amended the Agreement to modify the Scope of Services and increase the Contract Sum to One Million Three Hundred Five Thousand One Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty- Six Cents. ($ 1,305, 106. 66) as approved by City Council Resolution No. 2025- 070.

L City and Consultant now desire to amend the Agreement to modify the Scope of Services and increase the Contract Sum to One Million Three Hundred Sixty- Four Thousand Seven Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty- Six Cents. ($ 1,364, 706. 66).

The Parties therefore agree follows:

1. Amended Terms. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

1. 1 The Scope of Services as set forth in Section 1.1 of and Exhibit A to the Agreement is hereby amended to include the Services set forth in Attachment l ", attached hereto and incorporated herein.

1.2 The maximum compensation for the Services performed pursuant to this Amendment No. 4 shall not exceed Fifty- Nine Thousand Six Hundred Dollars 59,600. 00) thereby increasing the Contract Sum, as set forth in Section 2.1 of the Agreement, to One Million Three Hundred Sixty- Four Thousand Seven Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty- Six Cents. ($ 1,364, 706. 66).

Miscellaneous Provisions

2.1 Continued Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 5, all provisions of the Agreement, as amended by Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 5, whenever the term " Agreement" appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement, as amended by Amendment Nos. 1 through 5. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of this Amendment No. 5 and the provisions of the Agreement or Amendments No. 1 through 5, the provisions of this Amendment No. 5 shall control.

2.2 Consideration for Amendment. The parties hereby agree that they have each received adequate and independent consideration for the modifications to the Agreement set forth in this Amendment No. 5.

2.3 Authority. The persons executing this Amendment No. 5 on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that ( i) such party is duly organized and existing, ( ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Amendment No. 5 on behalf of said party, 760
iii) by so executing this Amendment No. 5, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Amendment No. 5, and ( iv) entering into this Amendment No. 5 does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which said party is bound.

1.3 Counterparts. This Amendment No. 5 may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be an original, but all of which together will constitute one instrnment.

1.4 Electronic Signatures. Each Party may adopt as its signature an electronic identification consisting of a symbol or code that is affixed to or contained in each document transmitted by such Party (" electronic signature"). The Paiiies hereto herby agree that electronic signatures are acceptable, shall have the same force and effect under the law as original wet signatures, and shall be sufficient to verify that the Parties have executed this Agreement and such other documents transmitted by the Parties.

SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
761
The Parties are signing this Amendment No. 5 the date stated in the introductory clause.

CITY OF BANNING
Douglas Schulze,
City Manager
City Council Approval: ____ _
ATTEST:

Caroline Patton
Administrative City Clerk

CONSULTANT
NAME:

TITLE:

NAME:

TITLE:

NOTE: PROOF OF AUTHORITY TO BIND CONTRACTING PARTY REQUIRED.

APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUlRED BY THE

BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT' S BUSINESS ENTITY.
762
A L B E R T A.

A S S O C I A T E S
Patrick Safari, CIP Manager
City of Banning
99 E. Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220
Sent via email: psafari@banningca. gov
ATTACHMENT "1"
August8, 2025
RE: Proposal for Contract Amendment No. 6 - Additional Environmental and Engineering Services for Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project ( PSA C00660) Dear Patrick,
Pursuant to our discussion on July 3, 2025 and August 5, 2025, Albert A. WEBB Associates ( WEBB) is pleased to provide you with this proposal for additional services for the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project. The previous contract amendment authorized WEBB to conduct surveys for the Crotch' s bumble bee ( Bombus crotchii, CBBJ within the Project limits. CBB is a candidate for listing under the California Endangered Species Act and therefore treated as a listed species by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife ( CDFW). The surveys were needed to comply with the Project' s CEQA mitigation measures and the forthcoming Streambed Alteration Agreement from CDFW. WEBB partnered with Osprey Environmental Associates who maintains the required credentials to survey for CBB.

The bee was found within the Project limits on June 27, 2025. Therefore, this contract amendment reflects the anticipation that the City will need an Incidental Take Permit ( ITP) for CBB from CDFW and that the offsite mitigation proposed for mitigating the Project' s jurisdictional impacts may also be required to include mitigation for CBB.

In addition, the City has been coordinating with Kinder Morgan on the relocation of their fuel lines within the Sun Lake Boulevard project limits. Last week, Kinder Morgan requested that the slope be moved 50 feet to the north along the eastern project boundary. This proposed change will require revisions to the street improvement plans, including the relocation of the storm drain outlet. In addition, preparation of the slope & drainage and the temporary construction easement documents. The City is requesting a contract amendment to revise the street & storm drain improvement plans and easement document to accommodate Kinder Morgan' s request.

Finally, the City is preparing for pre- construction and construction surveys and has requested WEBB to provide archaeological and paleontological support for CEQA mitigation measures MM CR- 1 ( Monitoring and Inadvertent Discovery), MM GEO- 1 ( Paleontological Worker Environmental Awareness Program}, and MM GEO- 2 ( Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program).

Scope of Work
Task 1: Incidental Take Permit ( ITP) Application
Osprey will prepare a complete ITP application that addresses potential impacts to CBB. The ITP application will include the following components:

1. Project Description
A detailed description of the proposed project, including scope, purpose, construction activities, and schedule, emphasizing elements relevant to biological resources and potential impacts to CBB. 3788 McCray Street, Riverside, CA 92506 IP: 951.~ fl-~ 070 IF:951. 788. 1256 Iwww. webbassociates. com 763
ATTACHMENT " 1"

2. Project Location
2020- 0126
City of Banning
A clear and accurate description of the project location, including jurisdiction, parcel boundaries, and regional context. GIS- based mapping will support this section, showing the spatial relationship of project elements to known CBS habitat.

3. Take Analysis
Assess the likelihood, nature, and extent of incidental take resulting from proposed project activities. This will include direct ( e.g., crushing during grading} and indirect ( e.g., habitat degradation) take mechanisms and their anticipated frequency and scale.

4. Impact Analysis
Evaluate the biological significance of the anticipated take, with an emphasis on how project- related impacts may affect local CBB populations. This will include discussion of habitat quality, floral resource availability, and the role of the site in the species' life cycle.

5. Jeopardy Analysis
Assess whether issuance of the ITP would jeopardize the continued existence of CBS. This analysis will include:

A review of known population trends and range contractions Evaluation of existing threats to CBB ( e.g., pesticides, habitat loss) Consideration of cumulative impacts from related or nearby projects (* if data is available) An assessment of how project mitigation and minimization measures offset potential risk to the species' long- term survival and reproductive success

6. Minimization and Mitigation Measures
Propose feasible and enforceable measures to avoid, minimize, and fully mitigate impacts. These may include:

Seasonal work windows
Designated biologist oversight
Daily biological sweeps
No- disturbance buffers around observed individuals or nests Restoration or enhancement of temporarily disturbed habitat Permanent preservation of habitat at a 1 :1 or greater ratio

7. Monitoring and Reporting Plan
Develop a monitoring plan to document implementation and effectiveness of all minimization and mitigation measures. This may include photo documentation, habitat success criteria, and adaptive management triggers.

8. Funding and Implementation
Describe the funding sources and financial assurances that are available to fully implement the ITP requirements, including habitat restoration, long- term management, and any required endowment contributions.

Osprey will be available to coordinate directly with CDFW staff throughout the application process to facilitate review and respond to any requests for additional information. We will prepare and submit the 2 A- 2
764
ATTACHMENT "1"
2020- 0126
City of Banning
ITP package in a format consistent with CDFW' s current guidelines and expectations. This scope assumes up to two meetings will be required to discuss the findings and ITP application.

Task 2: CBB Habitat Assessment of Offsite Mitigation Site APNs 532- 180- 049 and - 017)
The City owns two parcels that have been identified in the Project' s regulatory permit applications to serve as offsite mitigation for jurisdictional impacts. The riparian/ riverine portions of these parcels have already been surveyed by Osprey for suitability as mitigation for jurisdictional impacts; however, the survey did not assess whether it also contained suitable habitat for mitigation for CBB. Therefore, Osprey will conduct a biological assessment of the parcels to evaluate their suitability to support CBB habitat. This task will include both a comprehensive desktop review and a reconnaissance- level field assessment.

The desktop review will include a thorough analysis of relevant environmental databases and datasets, including but not limited to the California Natural Diversity Database ( CNDDB) and applicable citizen science databases such as iNaturalist and the Xerces Society' s California Bumble Bee Atlas. This review will assess the historical and recent documentation of CBB in the vicinity of the proposed mitigation parcels.

Following the literature review, Osprey biologists will conduct a field- based reconnaissance survey by foot to assess site conditions and determine habitat suitability for CBB. The survey will evaluate the presence and quality of key habitat features such as floral diversity and abundance, availability of nesting substrates e.g., rodent burrows, thatch layers), and potential overwintering habitat. All blooming species observed will be recorded and mapped using GPS and/ or GIS, and vegetation communities will be broadly classified to inform mitigation potential.

Upon completion of these efforts, Osprey will prepare a summary letter report detailing the findings of both the desktop and field assessments. The report will include a habitat suitability evaluation, mapped habitat features, and a discussion of the site' s potential to serve as suitable mitigation for CBB under the California Endangered Species Act. This information will serve as baseline data to inform future coordination with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and support Incidental Take Permit planning and review processes.

Task 3: Task 3. UAV ( Drone) Survey( s} ( Optional}
As an optional task, Osprey can perform a drone- based aerial survey of the two mitigation parcels identified in Task 2 to generate a high- resolution orthomosaic basemap. This product will provide a current, spatially accurate representation of site conditions, aiding in the visualization of habitat features and supporting documentation for mitigation planning.

The UAV survey will be conducted by an Osprey FM- licensed Remote Pilot in Command ( RPIC), accompanied by a qualified visual observer, in full compliance with FM Part 107 regulations. Collected imagery will be processed into georeferenced orthomosaics suitable for GIS integration. The resulting basemap will enhance coordination with regulatory agencies, support comparative analyses over time, and provide a detailed visual record for future project documentation. 3 A-3
765
ATTACHMENT " 1"
2020- 0126
City of Banning
Drone survey data can be integrated into all deliverables prepared under Task 1 and Task 2 and will serve as a valuable resource for informing future monitoring, restoration planning, or adaptive management efforts on the mitigation parcels.

Task 4: WEBB Meetings and Coordination
WEBB has included 28 hours for meetings and coordination associated with Tasks 1-3 and Task 6. This includes reviewing documents, attending meetings, and coordinating with the City, and Morongo Band of Missions Indians for the tribal monitoring services agreement.

Task 5: Revise Street & Storm Drain Improvement Plans and Prepare Easement Documents
As part of the contract amendment, we will revise the street and storm drain improvement plans for the Sun Lake Boulevard project to incorporate design changes requested by Kinder Morgan. They have asked for the top of the slope to be moved 50 feet to the north along the eastern project boundary to accommodate the relocation of their existing fuel lines. In response, we will coordinate with the City to confirm the revised alignment and any right- of- way impacts. We will update the street improvement plans to reflect the new slope location and associated grading modifications. Additionally, we will revise the storm drain system design, including the relocation of the existing storm drain outlet and any affected infrastructure. We will prepare the slope & drainage and temporary construction easement ( TCE) legal and plats. Our scope includes updating the relevant plan sheets, profiles, and details; providing revised quantities and construction cost estimates; and submitting the updated plans and easement documents for City review. We will also incorporate one round of review comments as part of this task.

Task 6: Archaeological and Paleontological Mitigation Measures WEBB will partner with CRM Tech to provide the City with the qualified archaeologists and paleontologists in order to fulfill CEQA mitigation measures MM CR- 1 ( Monitoring and Inadvertent Discovery), MM GEO1 (Paleontological Worker Environmental Awareness Program), and MM GEO- 2 (Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program).

Scope of Work: Preparation of the Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program Document CEQA mitigation measure MM GE0- 2 states that prior to the commencement of ground- disturbing activities, the Project Paleontologist ( retained under MM GE0- 1) shall prepare and implement a Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program ( PRIMP) for the Project. The PRIMP will describe the monitoring required during excavations that extend into locations of areas deemed to have a high paleontological resource potential, which include older Holocene- age and Pleistocene- age alluvial deposits. To meet the requirement to develop this document for this project, CRM TECH will review pertinent geological and paleontological documents available for the project area and vicinity and review the geotechnical study completed for the project as well as the site plan and grading plans. This information will be synthesized into a site- specific Program document that will outline the procedures for paleontological monitoring and for the proper treatment of all paleontological resources that may be encountered while monitoring the earth- disturbing activities associated with the project, as per the conditions for this project.
4 A-4
766
ATTACHMENT " 1"
2020- 0126
City of Banning
Scope of Work: Preparing and Presenting the Paleontological Worker' s Environmental Awareness Program
CEQA mitigation measure MM GEO- 1 states that in order to educate the construction contractor and each of the construction crews about the types of paleontological resources that may be encountered along the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project, prior to the start of the construction, the City of Banning shall retain a professional paleontologist ( the " Project Paleontologist") to prepare a Paleontological Worker Environmental Awareness Program ( WEAP). The Paleontological WEAP shall be taped and presented to any construction crew members not present at the preconstruction meeting during which it was initially presented prior to such crew members working on the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project. To prepare for and present the training program, CRM TECH will review the available paleontological information for the study area and vicinity; collect information about the types fossils that might be present in the project area; gather examples of fossils ( or photographs of fossils), maps, contact information, and other data for use during the training session; review and compile information regarding the monitoring activities including safety measures and the procedures to be followed during ground disturbance in sensitive areas and protocols that apply in the event that resources are discovered. This information will be assembled so that it can be presented in an easily understood, comprehensive Worker Environmental Awareness Program regarding paleontological resources.

Budget
Our proposed budget for the services listed herein will be billed on a not- to- exceed time and materials T&M) basis according to our existing contract for a total not to exceed of $59, 600.

Environmental & Engineering Services Fee
Task 1. ( Osprey) Preparation of CDFW ITP Application for the Crotch' s Bumble Bee $ 15, 530 Osprey) Biological Assessment for Potential Crotch' s Bumblebee Mitigation Task 2. Site( s) APNs: 532- 180- 049 & 532- 180- 017 $ 5, 750 Task 3. ( Osprey) UAV ( Drone) Survey ( Optional) $ 1, 960 WEBB) meetings and coordination, and tribal monitoring services agreement Task 4. with Morongo Band of Mission Indians $ 5, 690
WEBB) Revise Street & Storm Drain Improvement Plans and Prepare Easement Task 5. Documents $ 25, 540
Task 6. ( CRM Tech) Prepare PRIMP; Prepare and Present Paleontological WEAP $ 5, 130 TOTAL $ 59, 600
5 A-5
767
ATTACHMENT " 1"
2020- 0126
City of Banning
The following is a summary of original, current, and proposed authorizations according to our records.

WEBB Original Authorization: $
548, 416. 05 plus $ 54,841. 61 contingency
for total of $603, 725. 66
Change Order No. 1 $ 24, 983. 25 ( subtracted from contingency) Change Order No. 2 $ 5,974. 88 ( subtracted from contingency) Citv Council Resolution 2022- 106 $ 129, 400 ( rescinded) City Council Resolution 2022- 139 $ 148, 222
Chancie Order No. 4 $ 496, 079
Change Order No. 5 $ 57, 080
Current Authorization $ 1,305, 106. 66
Proposed Change Order $ 59, 600
Proposed Authorization $ 1,364, 706. 66
If you find this request acceptable, please issue a contract amendment to our office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to the City and look forward to hearing from you. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please call me at (951) 830- 4305.

Sincerely,
ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
Dilesh Sheth, PE, TE
Senior Vice President
Dilesh . Sheth@webbassociates. com
Copy: Stephanie Standerfer
Autumn Dewoody
6 A-6
768
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (C00660)

FOR THE DESIGN OF SUN LAKES BOULEVARD EXTENSION BY AND
BETWEEN THE CITY OF BANNING AND ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL
DESIGN SERVICES (“Amendment No. 2”) by and between the CITY OF BANNING (“City”) and ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES, a California Corporation (“Consultant”) is effective as of this day: .

RECITALS
A. City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement for Professional Design Services dated June 23, 2020 (“Agreement”) whereby Consultant agreed to provide Design Services for the Design of Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension following a Request for Proposals for an amount not to exceed Five-Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Four Hundred Sixteen Dollars and Five Cents ($548,416.05). The agreement included a 10% Contingency of Fifty Four Thousand Eight Hundred Forty One Dollars and Sixty One Cents ($54,841.61) for a total contract amount of Six Hundred Three Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty Five Dollars and Sixty Six Cents ($603,725.66) The Term of the Agreement was to commence on June 23, 2020, and continue in full force and effect until October 3, 2022.

B. On February 11, 2022, Public Works Department approved a change order to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for out-of-scope work including coordination with Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) in the amount of $24,983.25, leaving a contingency balance of $29,858.36.

C. On March 21, 2022, Public Works Department approved a change order to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for the preparation of a sediment transport analysis (out of scope) in the amount of $5,974.88, leaving a contingency balance of $23,883.48.

D. On August 23,2022 City Council adopted City Council Resolution 2022-106 which authorized the increase in compensation for services provided under the Agreement by One Hundred Twenty-Nine Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($129,400.00).

E. On October 11, 2022, City Council Adopted City Council Resolution 2022-139 to rescind Resolution 2022-106 and amend the Agreement to include additional compensation in the amount of One Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Two Hundred Twenty-Two Dollars ($148,222.00) for a new contract total of Seven Hundred Fifty-One Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-Seven Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($751,947.66) and to extend the term of the Agreement through June 30, 2024.

F. City and Consultant now desire to amend the Agreement to modify the Scope of Services, extend the Term of the Agreement to June 30, 2025, and increase the Contract Sum by Four Hundred Ninety-Six Thousand Seventy-Nine Dollars ($496,079.00) for a total not to exceed amount of One Million Two Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Twenty-Six Dollars and Sixty-Six 769
Cents ($1,248,026.66).

TERMS

1. Contract Changes. The Agreement is amended as provided herein. (a) Section 2.1 – “Contract Sum” of the Agreement is amended to provide that Consultant’s total compensation shall not to exceed One Million Two Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Twenty-Six Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($1,248,026.66). (b) Section 3.4 – “Term” of the Agreement is hereby amended to extend the Agreement term to June 30, 2025.
(c) Section 1.1, Exhibit “A” and Exhibit "D" - The Scope of Services as set forth in Section 1.1 of and Exhibit A to the Agreement is hereby amended to include the Services set forth in Attachment 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

2. Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 2 , all provisions of the Agreement as amended by Amendment Nos 1, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 2, whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement, as amended by Amendments Nos. 1 through 2 to the Professional Services Agreement. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of this Amendment No. 1 and the provisions of the Agreement or Amendments No. 1 through 2, the provisions of this Amendment No. 2 shall control.

3. Affirmation of Agreement; Warranty Re Absence of Defaults. City and Consultant each ratify and reaffirm each and every one of the respective rights and obligations arising under the Agreement. Each party represents and warrants to the other that there have been no written or oral modifications to the Agreement other than as provided herein. Each party represents and warrants to the other that the Agreement is currently an effective, valid and binding obligation.

4. Adequate Consideration. The parties hereto irrevocably stipulate and agree that they have each received adequate and independent consideration for the performance of the obligations they have undertaken pursuant to this Amendment No. 2.

5. Authority. The persons executing this Amendment No. 2 on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Amendment No. 2 on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Amendment No. 2, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) the entering into this Amendment No. 2 does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound.

6. Counterparts. This Amendment No. [Insert amendment number] may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be an original, but all of which together will constitute one instrument.

7. Electronic Signatures. Each Party may adopt as its signature an electronic identification consisting of a symbol or code that is affixed to or contained in each document 770
transmitted by such Party (“electronic signature”). The Parties hereto herby agree that electronic signatures are acceptable, shall have the same force and effect under the law as original wet signatures, and shall be sufficient to verify that the Parties have executed this Agreement and such other documents transmitted by the Parties.
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
771
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement the day and year first hereinabove written.

CITY OF BANNING CONSULTANT
Douglas Schulze, Date
City Manager
Dilesh Sheth Date
Vice President
NAME: Date
TITLE:

ATTEST:

Caroline Patton Date
Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Richards, Watson & Gershon
95-1723730
Tax ID No.

Address:
3788 McCray Street
Riverside, CA 92506
Serita R. Young Date
City Attorney
City Council Approval:

NOTE: PROOF OF AUTHORITY TO BIND CONTRACTING PARTY REQUIRED.

APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS,

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY.
772
G:\Proposals\FORMAL PROPOSALS\City of Banning\015921 Sun Lakes Change Order\Sun Lakes _Additional Engineering and Env Services_2023-07-06.docx July 6, 2023
Mr. Patrick Safari
CIP Manager
City of Banning
99 E. Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220
RE: Request for Additional Engineering and Environmental Services for the Sun Lakes Blvd. Extension Project (C00660)
Dear Patrick,
Albert A. Webb Associates (WEBB) respectfully submit this change order for additional Engineering and Environmental Services for the revised alignment of the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project (C00660). It is necessary to revise the alignment of this roadway as it is infeasible to obtain an easement from Kinder Morgan to place the road atop their existing high-pressure gas line.

WEBB has been contracted by the City of Banning to provide engineering and environmental services for the Sun Lakes Blvd. Extension Project. The following are outof-scope additional task items to be provided by WEBB for the proposed revised alignment of Sun Lakes Boulevard:
• Update final design plans and documents
• Revised CEQA Document
• Revised Technical Studies (Biological, Cultural, and Air Quality/GHG/Energy) • Revised Jurisdictional Delineation and Permitting
• Utility coordination
• Project Management, Coordination, and Meetings
At this time, we are respectfully requesting compensation for the tasks already completed and the future tasks to be completed as outlined below.

Attachment "1"
773
EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES
The proposed Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension project (Project) is a project that entails the construction of a new section of Sun Lakes Boulevard from Highland Home Road to Sunset Avenue. The proposed Project is approximately 5,400 linear feet (1.02 mile) long and 110 feet wide and will be constructed according to the City's General Plan Typical Section for an Arterial Highway.

Westward Avenue is a straight east-west unpaved dirt road between Highland Home Road and Sunset Avenue. Kinder Morgan has two fuel lines (16- and 20-inch diameters) in two 20-feet wide easements along Westward Avenue. The proposed Sun Lakes Boulevard curvilinear alignment overlaps Westward Avenue and Kinder Morgan easements, as shown in Figure 1. Initially, Kinder Morgan had no issue with roadway construction over their easements. Later, Kinder Morgan changed their policies to restrict roadway improvement over their lines and directed the City to realign Sun Lakes Boulevard to minimize the impact on Kinder Morgan fuel lines.

Sun Lakes Boulevard Circulation Plan Alignment
Figure 1
WEBB had already completed draft CEQA documents and associated technical studies and substantially completed final design plans, studies, and documents for the Project. Now, WEBB prepared a preliminary realignment of Sun Lakes Boulevard, as shown in Figure 2. Since the completion of the draft CEQA document and associated technical studies, the alignment for Sun Lakes Boulevard will be modified to an area that falls outside the previously surveyed areas in some places. Therefore, updates to the CEQA document and the relevant technical studies are needed now. In addition, redesigning all final design documents and update of studies and documents are needed.

Sun Lakes Boulevard Realignment to Minimize Impacts on Kinder Morgan Fuel Lines Figure 2
Based on the feedback we received at the pre-application meeting with resource agencies on June 14, 2023, they understood the Kinder Morgan easement challenges. They agreed with the City to allow roadway realignment, as shown in Figure 2 above.

The City has received substantial funds for the Project and would like to move forward as soon as possible to meet the funding deadlines. The following is our understanding of the Project to complete the PS&E:

Attachment "1"
774

1. Drainage Report and Storm Drain Improvement Plans - Minor updates to the drainage report will be required. Storm drain alignments and elevations will remain the same; minor changes may be needed. Headwall and wing wall changes will be required to match the street improvement plans.

Plans will be submitted for 90%, 100%, and approval.

2. Street Improvement Plans – Try to hold the profile over the storm drains. Revise street improvement plans and profiles for the realignment. Redesign and detail out 7-ADA ramps. No driveways, ADA ramps, and curb ramps will be provided along the alignment. We will provide AC berm at the proposed driveways per City’s request. We will be submitted for 90%, 100%, and approval.

3. Signing & Striping Plans – Revise plans per the realignment and submit for 90% and 100% for approval.

4. Street Light Location Plans – Revise street light location plans per the revised alignment and submit for approval for 90% and 100%. The City will prepare street light conduit and conductor plans.

5. Landscape and Irrigation Plans – Because of budget constraints, the City decided not to landscape the parkway and median at this time, so an update of plans will not be required. The City would like to install sleeves with the Project to avoid future trenching across the pavement. The conduit sleeves will be shown on the street improvement plans.

6. Coordination with the Developer – The City will coordinate with the developer. WEBB will not be required to attend meetings and provide coordination with the developer. WEBB's scope of work includes legal & plats and exhibits needed to obtain right-of-way and easement for the roadway and storm drain improvement. The developer will analyze any impact on future development.

7. Potholing – We will prepare an exhibit for approximately 40 potholes. The City will coordinate and hire a potholing contractor to perform the work. WEBB will conduct the field survey and collect data points set by the potholing contractor.

8. Coordination with Kinder Morgan – Even with the roadway realignment, approximately 500' on both ends will impact Kinder Morgan fuel lines. We have estimated our effort under utility coordination and meetings. It is very hard to predict the effort required to estimate effort to obtain Kinder Morgan approval and to meet the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) requirements. We have added optional items and a budget to provide additional effort if needed.

9. Out-of-scope services – We will obtain authorization from the City for the out-scope services before beginning out-of-scope tasks.

Attachment "1"
775
Our scope of services is as follows:

Task 1 – Update Final Design Plans, Studies, and Documents

1.1 – Street Improvement Plans
Additional work includes the following items:
a. Update of horizontal alignment to minimize impacts to Kinder Morgan fuel lines. b. Update the vertical centerline, curbs, and right-of-way profiles. c. Update grading limits. The grading limits will consider cut and fill amounts, environmental impact, and resources.
d. Revise raised medians layout and profiles
e. Update sidewalks, ADA ramps, and driveways design and details. f. Review utility adjustment and relocation and update plans and construction notes.

1.2 – Storm Drain System Design
The approved scope and budget for the Project included a task for the development of a preliminary roadway drainage design and tasks for a final drainage report and storm drain plans. The preliminary drainage design task included a preliminary hydrology and hydraulic analysis, preliminary scour calculations, preliminary plans, and a preliminary drainage report. The preliminary design was completed and submitted in November of 2020.

After the preliminary design was completed, concerns were raised by the resource agencies, which necessitated a sediment transport study be prepared for the Project. This study was completed and concluded that revisions to the culvert configuration were needed to address those concerns. WEBB's efforts to coordinate with the sediment transport study engineer and develop a revised design concept were covered under both a separate approved change order and the remaining preliminary design task budget.

A change order was also approved by the City to update the plans based on the revised concept. This change order included updating the drainage report, update of the drainage plan sheets, and preparation of structural details and calculations.

As WEBB was proceeding with the updates to the design, input was received from Kinder Morgan stating that the drainage outlet structures would not be permitted within their easement. WEBB was then directed to stop work while the City coordinated with Kinder Morgan. WEBB was authorized by the City in January 2023 to proceed. An additional redesign of the outlet structures was completed to ensure that they did not encroach into the easement as requested.

After the redesign was substantially complete, WEBB was given direction to realign the street to minimize the impact on the existing Kinder Morgan easement. This change will require a redesign of the channel inlet and outlet structures, a redesign of the street storm drains, and a redesign of the intercept drain on the northerly side of the street. The drainage plans will also need to be redrafted. The hydraulic calculations (HEC-RAS, WSPG, etc) and drainage report will also need to be updated for these changes. The structural design work that has been started will also need to be redone. Added to this work is also an update to the preliminary geotechnical report to provide all the parameters needed to finalize the structural design calculations.

Attachment "1"
776

1.2.1 - Final Drainage Report Update - Additional work items include:
a. Due to road realignment, update the HEC-RAS model for updated inlet/outlet configuration. b. Update WSPG calculations for culverts, new street storm drains, and intercept drain designs. c. Update report text and exhibits to reflect revised road alignment. d. Address additional plan check comments.

1.2.2 – Storm Drain Plan Update – Additional work items include:
a. Update the design and plan details for the outlet structures to avoid the Kinder Morgan easement. b. Update design and plans due to the road realignment (channel inlet and outlets, street storm drain, northerly intercept ditch, and appurtenances).
c. Coordination with WEBB environmental team for the information requested and/or needed.

1.2.3 - Structural Design Details - Additional work items include:
a. Update structural calculations for revised inlet and outlet configuration. b. Coordination with the geotechnical engineer for information required for structural design. c. Review of Geotechnical report of adjacent development provided by City. d. Update of Preliminary Geotechnical report by sub-consultant.

1.2.4 – Assessment of Potential Sediment Transport Impact - Additional work items include:

A study is to be conducted to assess the potential sediment transport impacts associated with the improvement of Sun Lakes Boulevard. The proposed road improvements involve the addition of several new culvert crossings that are to be constructed upstream of two existing dry weather crossings. The proposed culvert crossings have increased in size since the hydraulic assessment previously conducted by Northwest Hydraulic Consultants (NHC) in 2021. The existing dry weather crossings are to remain in place with the proposed road improvement plan.

Impacts on sediment transport will depend on the configuration proposed for the new crossings. A high-level assessment of the potential effects will be completed through a comparison of hydraulic characteristics pre- and post-project.

We will evaluate (existing conditions models, also developed previously provided for the 2021 NHC study) 2D model hydraulic models (HEC-RAS) of the proposed improvement plan.

Assumptions:
a. The Resource Agencies are currently reviewing the HEC-RAS model prepared for the revised culvert concept. WEBB will proceed with the final design phase ahead of Resource Agency approval under the assumption that they will not have any comments that will impact the culvert design or analysis.

This additional budget request does not include any additional changes to the culvert analysis or design resulting from future Resource Agency comments.
b. It is assumed that the Caltrans Standard Detail D81 for double-cell reinforced concrete boxes can be utilized for the multi-cell boxes required for this Project, and no special structural design is required for these culverts.
c. The final plans and analysis will be designed with the assumption that the future Sunset Crossing project will be designed and built after the roadway project is completed. This additional budget request does not include any additional design or analysis required to assess changes to the roadway design or hydraulic analysis based on this future Project. It also assumes that drainage facilities for the Sunset Crossroads property (outside of the street right of way) will be designed and constructed by the developer's plans and is not a part of the road project scope.

Attachment "1"
777

1.3 – ROW and Easement Documents
We will prepare and update fourteen (14) documents needed for additional right-of-way and easements.

1.4 – Signing & Striping Plans
Update signing & striping plans for the revised alignment.

1.5 – Street Light Location Plans
a. Update street light location plans for the revised alignment.

1.6 – Specifications
The City will provide us with its boilerplate Technical Provisions in Microsoft Word format. We will compile the project specifications, including the project-specific scope of work in the Technical Specifications, and provide Special Technical Provisions beyond the City's Standard Technical Provisions. With each submittal, WEBB will provide a bid schedule, special provisions, and technical specifications. The specifications shall be signed by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California as complete and ready for bidding purposes and awarding contracts for construction for the improvements. The latest edition of the Greenbook (Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and subsequent amendments) will be used on the Project, except for the signing/striping elements. The City and Caltrans Standard Specifications will be used for these improvements. The City will prepare the bid book.

1.7 - Cost Estimates
We will provide a construction quantity and cost estimate with each submittal of plans. The unit costs shall be based upon the most current cost information for recent similar projects in the area compiled by us and approved by the City. The estimated items of work with quantities shall include, but not be limited to, itemizing all removals, clearing and grubbing, relocations, sidewalk, curb & gutter, driveway approaches, Asphalt Concrete (AC), utility improvements, applying/painting of pavement legends & striping, signs, traffic control, raised pavement markers, street lights in City limits, storm drain improvements, and project identification and completion signs. The estimates will also include probable costs for utility relocations, right-of-way, and temporary construction easements.

Task 3 – Revised Environmental Documentation
Since the completion of the draft CEQA document and associated technical studies, the alignment for Sun Lakes Boulevard has been modified to an area that, in some places, falls outside the previously surveyed areas. Therefore, updates to the CEQA document and the relevant technical studies are needed at this time.

3.1 - Revised Cultural Resources Study – Additional work items include:
a. Applied Earthworks (AE), WEBB's cultural resources subconsultant will conduct a complete and intensive cultural resource survey of the additional Project acreage. Two previously documented cultural resources (a large farm/ranch complex and a large historic water-control complex) are located within the expanded Project area. AE will confirm the location of these previously identified resources in proximity to the expanded Project area and assess their current condition.

Attachment "1"
778
b. AE will update the Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment (Phase I CRA) and paleontological memorandum to include the additional Project acreage, as well as add language regarding federal funding. This scope includes two rounds of comments following the City review of the draft updated Phase I CRA and no major revisions will be required. The draft updated Phase I CRA and paleontological memorandum will be submitted electronically in MS Word format for ease of review; the final updated Phase I CRA and paleontological memorandum will be submitted electronically as a PDF file.

3.2 - Revised Biological Resources Studies – Additional work items include:
a. WSP USA Environment & Infrastructure Solutions (WSA),1 WEBB's biological resources
subconsultant will revise the figures and exhibits, recalculate impacts, and update the previously finalized versions of the following reports to include the revised street alignment (Project footprint). The updated draft reports listed below will be submitted electronically for ease of review; the final revised reports will be submitted electronically as PDF files.

1. Habitat Assessment/Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Consistency Analysis,

2. Focused Burrowing Owl Survey,

3. Narrow Endemic and Criterial Area Plants Survey,

4. Los Angeles Pocket Mouse Protocol Survey

5. Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP)

6. West and Dry Season Fairy Shrimp Survey Memo Update

3.3 - Additional Environmental Coordination – Additional work items include:

WEBB has expended all original budgets associated with coordination and meetings with the Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) and regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Regional Water Quality Control Board and US Fish and Wildlife Service). Given that a meeting has been scheduled for June 14, 2023 with the RCA and regulatory agencies, and since there will be pre- and post- meeting coordination needed with the City and WEBB Team, additional request for budgets to do this meeting, along with more frequent coordination with the City as the revised CEQA document is underway, will also be needed.

3.4 – Revised Environmental (CEQA) Documentation – Additional work items include:

The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) in addition to the CEQA notices for the original proposed alignment have been prepared. The IS/MND was ready to be released in January 2024 for public review prior to the decision to revise the Project alignment. Because the Project footprint has changed and revised biological resources reports, cultural report, and jurisdictional delineation must be prepared, additional budget is needed to revise and complete processing the IS/MND for public review through the Final MND phase. We are asking for an additional task authorization to complete this task since the budget originally allocated has been expended.

This scope does not include updating the air quality/greenhouse gas analysis completed in November 2021, which was prepared using the California Emissions Estimator Model® version 2020.4.0 (CalEEMod) model.

The California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) released CalEEMod version 2022.1 in December 2022. However, WEBB is not proposing to redo the air quality/greenhouse gas analysis using 1 Wood Environment Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. was acquired by WSP.

Attachment "1"
779
the new model because: (i) the analysis was completed before the new model was released; (ii) there are no substantial changes to the Project that would warrant remodeling construction impacts; (iii) this is a capital improvement project; and (iv) and the results of the original air quality/greenhouse gas analysis were well below the numeric thresholds that would indicate a potentially significant impact. In the event comments are received during the public review period for the IS/MND, WEBB would address that in the responses to comments and explain the rationale for not remodeling the Project's air quality/greenhouse gas emissions.

Task 4 - Jurisdictional Delineation and Permitting
The original field surveys for the jurisdictional delineation (JD) were completed summer 2021, exhibits prepared, impacts calculated, and these results were presented to the resource agencies. WEBB will update the previous JD, to cover the new areas proposed by the revised Project alignment, including a 100-foot survey buffer. Specifically, WEBB will update the existing JD report with regulatory changes that have occurred since preparation of the original 2021 JD report. Following the literature review update, WEBB will conduct a one-day site visit to the revised Project site to document suspected wetlands and non-wetland waters of the U.S, waters of the State located outside federal jurisdiction, and streambed according to Fish and Game Code.

Waters of the U.S. will be evaluated using the methodology set forth in the guidelines provided in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987), the 2008 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Arid West Region (Version 2.0), and the 2008 Field Guide to the Identification of the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) in the Arid West Region of the Western United States. Potential Waters of the State that are outside of federal jurisdiction will be identified following the Procedures for Discharges of Dredged or Fill Material to Waters of the State. Fish and Game Code, Section 1600 et al streambed will be identified as the bank-to-bank where the active streambed shows the fullest expression on the landscape.

After the site-visit is completed, WEBB will update the JD report with the new data collected from the site visit including tables, figures, and impacts discussion. The report will be prepared following the 2017 U.S Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Minimum Standards for Acceptance of Aquatic Resources Delineation Reports. The JD report will provide an analysis and discussion of the existing site conditions, methods, and results of the delineation, including details such as soil types, hydrology, and vegetation present on the site.

The report will also provide a discussion of the impacts proposed to any jurisdictional areas, including photographs and exhibits depicting any jurisdictional features.

Task 5 – Utility Coordination and Additional Field Survey for Potholing (Time and Material Basis) WEBB will Identify all known utilities that potentially conflict with the planned project improvements and determine special requirements for facilities, including protection, relocation, right-of-way easements, and construction. WEBB will coordinate with utility companies to schedule the relocation of the utilities before the start of construction.
a. Coordinate with Kinder Morgan to construct Sun Lakes Boulevard for segments east of Highland Home Road and west of Sunset Avenue.
b. Coordinate with City to relocate power poles and guy anchors and adjust electrical vaults. c. Coordinate with the City for relocation and adjustment of water valves, fire hydrants, blow-offs, air vacuum, and sewer manholes.
d. Coordinate with the Gas Company to relocate and adjust gas valves and electronic gas station.

Attachment "1"
780
e. Coordinate with telecommunication companies for the adjustment of telecommunication manholes.
f. Attend six (6) meetings with utility companies.
g. We will prepare an exhibit for approximately 40 potholes. The City will coordinate and hire a potholing contractor to perform the work. WEBB will conduct the field survey and collect data points set by the potholing contractor.

Task 6 – Project Management, Coordination, and Meetings (Time and Material Basis) We will schedule and attend meetings as follows:
a. Project Development Team (PDT) meetings – We estimate twelve (12) meetings b. Environmental meetings - We estimate six (6) meetings We will schedule, chair, and prepare meeting agendas and meeting minutes. The agendas will be submitted to the City for review one working day before the meeting. The minutes will be distributed to all attendees, everyone invited, and the City's Project Manager within five working days after the meeting.

The minutes shall include but are not limited to a list of attendees with phone numbers and contact emails, a summary of discussion items, a decision log, ROW/Utility Tracking Sheets, any pertinent information, and follow-up to action items.

We will update project schedules. The project schedules will be divided into tasks and subtasks in full detail, including the City function timeline, critical path, and outside sources such as agencies or utilities.

Task 7 – Engineering Support Services for Environmental Documentation, Jurisdictional Delineation, and Permitting (Time and Material Basis)
We have been providing out-of-scope services for the realignment of the roadway and coordination with the City and resource agencies.

We will provide engineering support services for environmental documentation, jurisdictional delineation, and permitting.

Optional Task 8 – Additional Work for Kinder Morgan (Time and Material Basis) Even with the roadway realignment, approximately 500' on both ends will impact Kinder Morgan fuel lines.

We have estimated our effort under utility coordination and meetings. It is very hard to predict the effort required to estimate effort to obtain Kinder Morgan approval and to meet the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) requirements. Any additional effort required beyond estimated under the utility coordination and meetings, with the approval of the City, WEBB will provide additional support services.

Attachment "1"
781
EXHIBIT "B" COMPENSATION FOR SCOPE OF SERVICES
Total fees for services shown in the Scope of Services (Exhibit "A") shall not exceed $496,079 without prior authorization from the client. If the optional Task 7 is to be conducted, the total shall be provided on a time and materials basis not to exceed $516,079 after City authorization for the task. We propose to provide details in Exhibit "A" for an initial Time & Materials fee to be billed monthly in accordance with the attached fee schedule.

Task budgets are estimates and may be used interchangeably to stay within the budget total. Any additional services requested outside this scope will be provided under separate contract addenda for additional fees.

Charges for deliveries, printing, copying, mileage, postage, outside services, and for coordination or other services not specifically listed in the scope of work (Reimbursable Expenses) will be billed on a time and material basis in accordance with our Schedule of Fees. Checking and/or filing fees are not included in this contract and shall be paid directly to the appropriate governmental agency by the client.

If you find this request acceptable, please issue contract amendment #1 with the current dollar amount to the Final Engineering Services contract dated June 23, 2020. We appreciate this opportunity to serve your firm and look forward to hearing from you. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, don't hesitate to contact me at 951-830-4305.

Sincerely,

ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
Dilesh Sheth, PE / TE
Senior Vice President
Attachment "1"
782
Exhibit B
Item Description
Stephanie Standerfer Cheryl DeGano Autumn DeWoody Marshall Paymard Field Biologist Virginia Waters Jacqueline Gamboa Joseph Caldwell Eric Hays Ranjit Singh Nathan Armendariz Dilesh Sheth Nicholas Keller Joy Schwiebert Son Le Deborah Saulina Danielle Logsdon Jason Ardery Michael Johnson Linda Bouschet Jon Ros Andres Lopez Party Chief/2-Person Survey Crew Total HoursSubtotal - Labor
Sub-consultant budget
Total/task
Classification
Principal IIPrincipal IIAssociate IIAssociate IIAssistant IIAssistant IIAssistant IIPrincipal IIPrincipal ISenior IIIAssistant VPrincipal IISenior IAssistant VAssociate IIAssistant IIISenior IIIPrincipal IIPrincipal IIAssociate IIISenior IISenior I Party
Chief/2-
Person
Billout Rate 293$ 293$ 197$ 197$ 135$ 135$ 135$ 293$ 279$ 252$ 173$ 293$ 232$ 173$ 197$ 144$ 252$ 293$ 293$ 208$ 240$ 232$ 302$ Task 1 - Update Final Design Plans, Studies, and Documents 24 62 168 430 30 208 108 48 60 110 8 16 110 14 1396 $ 295,874 $ 6,600 $ 302,474

1.1 Street i\Improvement Plans $ - $ - $ -
Update Street i\Improvement Plans 12 200 12 40 264 $ 61,724 $ - $ 61,724 Redesign ADA Ramps (7) 2 70 12 84 $ 15,720 $ - $ 15,720

1.2 Storm Drain System Design

1.2.1 - Final Drainage Report Update 8 20 50 2 8 4 4 96 $ 19,588 $ - $ 19,588

1.2.2 - Storm Drain Plan Update 8 40 120 300 2 4 4 478 $ 97,814 $ - $ 97,814

1.2.3 - Structural Design Details 2 4 80 2 4 4 96 $ 17,576 $ - $ 17,576

1.2.4 - Assessment of Potential Sediment Transport Impact 8 4 8 2 4 4 30 $ 7,646 $ 6,600 $ 14,246

1.3 ROW and Easement Documents (14) 8 8 8 8 16 110 14 172 $ 38,296 $ - $ 38,296

1.4 Signing and Striping Plans 6 40 4 50 $ 9,494 $ - $ 9,494

1.5 Street Light Plans 16 4 20 $ 3,344 $ 3,344

1.6 Specifications 8 8 4 8 20 48 $ 11,612 $ - $ 11,612

1.7 Cost Estimate 8 8 4 8 8 8 14 58 $ 13,060 $ - $ 13,060 Task 3 - CEQA Compliance Services Revised Environmental Documentation 56 108 8 68 240 $ 58,808 $ 17,820 $ 76,628

3.1 Revised Cultural Resources Study 4 4 8 $ 1,712 $ 3,520 $ 5,232

3.2 Revised Biological Resources Studies 4 4 8 $ 1,712 $ 14,300 $ 16,012

3.3 Additional Environmental Coordination 40 60 100 $ 29,300 $ - $ 29,300

3.4 Revised CEQA Documentation 16 40 8 60 124 $ 26,084 $ - $ 26,084 Task 4 - Jurisdictional Delineation and Permitting 28 20 89 74 12 16 239 $ 49,955 $ - $ 49,955

4.1 Revised Survey, Mapping, Impact Calculation, Report Preparation, and Regulatory Permitting (includes optional UAV Remote sensing updates) 28 20 89 74 12 16 239 $ 49,955 $ - $ 49,955 Task 5 - Utility Coordination and Additional Field Survey for Potholing (T&M) 6 6 6 16 10 2 4 8 58 $ 12,942 -$ $ 12,942

5.1 Utility Coordination & Meetings (6) 6 6 12 6 30 $ 6,036 $ - $ 6,036

5.2 Additional Survey for Potholing 6 4 4 2 4 8 28 $ 6,906 $ 6,906 Task 6 - Project Management, Coordination & Meeting (T&M) 26 12 30 42 110 $ 24,598 $ - $ 24,598

6.1 Project Management and Coordination 8 12 20 $ 5,368 $ - $ 5,368

6.2 PDT Meetings (Estimate 12) 12 12 24 24 72 $ 15,096 $ - $ 15,096

6.3 Environmental Meetings (estimate 6) 6 6 6 18 $ 4,134 $ - $ 4,134 8 8 24 16 16 14 28 8 122
$ 29,482 -$ $ 29,482

7.1 Realignment and Pre-Coordination with Agencies 8 8 8 8 6 12 50 $ 12,882 $ - $ 12,882

7.2 Engineering Support Services for Environmental Documentation, Jurisdictional Delineation, and Permitting 16 8 16 8 16 8 72
$ 16,600 $ - $ 16,600
92 136 97 74 12 16 68 48 62 184 446 76 214 154 48 106 170 8 18 110 14 4 8 2165 $ 471,659 $ 24,420 $ 496,079 Optional Task 8 - Additional Work for Kinder Morgan (T&M) $ - $ 20,000 $ 20,000

8.1 Additional Work for Kinder Morgan $ - $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Total
Additional Engineering and Environmental Services for the Sun Lakes Blvd. Extension Project (C00660) Task 7 - Engineering Support Services for Environmental Documentation, Jurisdictional Delineation, and Permitting (T&M)
G:\Proposals\FORMAL PROPOSALS\City of Banning\015921 Sun Lakes Change Order\Sun Lakes CO 3 Budget_2023-07-06 7/6/202310:44 AM Attachment "1"
783
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
(C00660) FOR THE DESIGN OF SUN LAKES BOULEVARD

EXTENSION BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF BANNING AND ALBERT
A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES (“Amendment No. 3”) by and between the CITY OF BANNING (“City”) and ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES, a California Corporation (“Consultant”) is effective as of this day: ______________.

RECITALS
A. City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement for Professional Design Services dated June 23, 2020 (“Agreement”) whereby Consultant agreed to provide Design Services for the Design of Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension following a Request for Proposals for an amount not to exceed Five-Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Four Hundred Sixteen Dollars and Five Cents ($548,416.05). The agreement included a 10% Contingency of Fifty-Four Thousand Eight Hundred Forty One Dollars and Sixty-One Cents ($54,841.61) for a total contract amount of Six Hundred Three Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty Five Dollars and Sixty Six Cents ($603,725.66) The Term of the Agreement was to commence on June 23, 2020, and continue in full force and effect until October 3, 2022.

B. On February 11, 2022, Public Works Department approved a change order to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for out-ofscope work including coordination with Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) in the amount of $24,983.25, leaving a contingency balance of $29,858.36.

C. On March 21, 2022, Public Works Department approved a change order to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for the preparation of a sediment transport analysis (out of scope) in the amount of $5,974.88, leaving a contingency balance of $23,883.48.

D. On August 23,2022 City Council adopted City Council Resolution 2022-106 which authorized the increase in compensation for services provided under the Agreement by One Hundred Twenty-Nine Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($129,400.00).

E. On October 11, 2022, City Council Adopted City Council Resolution 2022-139 to rescind Resolution 2022-106 and amend the Agreement to include additional compensation in the amount of One Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Two Hundred Twenty-Two Dollars ($148,222.00) for a new contract total of Seven Hundred FiftyOne Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-Seven Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($751,947.66) and to extend the term of the Agreement through June 30, 2024.

F. On October 23, 2023, City and Consultant amended the Agreement to modify the Scope of Services, extend the Term of the Agreement to June 30, 2025, and increase the Contract Sum by Four Hundred Ninety-Six Thousand Seventy-Nine Dollars Docusign Envelope ID: 01AD65EE-8891-443E-8A68-1BCD3B1F23B4 1/6/2025
784 94
($496,079.00) for a total not to exceed amount of One Million Two Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Twenty-Six Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($1,248,026.66).

G. City and Consultant now desire to amend the Agreement to extend the Term of the Agreement to June 30, 2026.

The Parties therefore agree follows:

1. Amended Terms. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

1.1 The Term of the Agreement, as set forth in Section 3.4 of the Agreement, is hereby extended through June 30, 2026, unless sooner terminated or extended as provided in the Agreement.

2. Miscellaneous Provisions

2.1 Continued Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 3, all provisions of the Agreement, as amended by Amendment Nos. 1, 2, and 3, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 3, whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement, as amended by Amendment Nos. 1 through 3. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of this Amendment No. 3 and the provisions of the Agreement or Amendments No. 1 through 3, the provisions of this Amendment No. 3 shall control.

2.2 Consideration for Amendment. The parties hereby agree that they have each received adequate and independent consideration for the modifications to the Agreement set forth in this Amendment No. 3.

2.3 Authority. The persons executing this Amendment No. 3 on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Amendment No. 3 on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Amendment No. 3, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Amendment No. 3, and (iv) entering into this Amendment No. 3 does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which said party is bound.

2.4 Counterparts. This Amendment No. 3 may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be an original, but all of which together will constitute one instrument.

2.5 Electronic Signatures. Each Party may adopt as its signature an electronic identification consisting of a symbol or code that is affixed to or contained in each document transmitted by such Party (“electronic signature”). The Parties hereto herby agree that electronic signatures are acceptable, shall have the same force and effect under the law as original wet signatures, and shall be sufficient Docusign Envelope ID: 01AD65EE-8891-443E-8A68-1BCD3B1F23B4 785 94
to verify that the Parties have executed this Agreement and such other documents transmitted by the Parties.
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
Docusign Envelope ID: 01AD65EE-8891-443E-8A68-1BCD3B1F23B4 786 94
The Parties are signing this Amendment No. 3 the date stated in the introductory clause.

CITY OF BANNING CONSULTANT
Douglas Schulze,
City Manager
NAME:

TITLE:

City Council Approval: __n/a___________ NAME:

TITLE:

ATTEST:

Caroline Patton
Administrative City Clerk
NOTE: PROOF OF AUTHORITY TO BIND CONTRACTING PARTY REQUIRED.

APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE

BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY.

Docusign Envelope ID: 01AD65EE-8891-443E-8A68-1BCD3B1F23B4 Stephanie Standerfer
Vice President
787 94
AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
(C00660) FOR THE DESIGN OF SUN LAKES BOULEVARD

EXTENSION BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF BANNING AND ALBERT
A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES (“Amendment No. 4”) by and between the CITY OF BANNING (“City”) and ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES, a California Corporation (“Consultant”) is effective as of this day: ______________.

RECITALS
A. City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement for Professional Design Services dated June 23, 2020 (“Agreement”) whereby Consultant agreed to provide Design Services for the Design of Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension following a Request for Proposals for an amount not to exceed Five-Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Four Hundred Sixteen Dollars and Five Cents ($548,416.05). The agreement included a 10% Contingency of Fifty-Four Thousand Eight Hundred Forty One Dollars and Sixty-One Cents ($54,841.61) for a total contract amount of Six Hundred Three Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty-Five Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($603,725.66). The Term of the Agreement was to commence on June 23, 2020, and continue in full force and effect until October 3, 2022.

B. On February 11, 2022, Public Works Department approved a change order to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for out-ofscope work including coordination with Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) in the amount of $24,983.25, leaving a contingency balance of $29,858.36.

C. On March 21, 2022, Public Works Department approved a change order to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for the preparation of a sediment transport analysis (out of scope) in the amount of $5,974.88, leaving a contingency balance of $23,883.48.

D. On August 23,2022 City Council adopted City Council Resolution 2022-106 which authorized the increase in compensation for services provided under the Agreement by One Hundred Twenty-Nine Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($129,400.00).

E. On October 11, 2022, City Council Adopted City Council Resolution 2022-139 to rescind Resolution 2022-106 and amend the Agreement to include additional compensation in the amount of One Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Two Hundred Twenty-Two Dollars ($148,222.00) for a new contract total of Seven Hundred FiftyOne Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-Seven Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($751,947.66) and to extend the term of the Agreement through June 30, 2024.

F. On October 23, 2023, City and Consultant amended the Agreement to modify the Scope of Services, extend the Term of the Agreement to June 30, 2025, and increase the Contract Sum by Four Hundred Ninety-Six Thousand Seventy-Nine Dollars Docusign Envelope ID: 01A08EE0-B9E7-4A85-B399-92075202D3D3 May 27, 2025
788 932
($496,079.00) for a total not to exceed amount of One Million Two Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Twenty-Six Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($1,248,026.66).

G. On January 6, 2025, City and Consultant amended the Agreement to extend the Term of the Agreement to June 30, 2026.

H. City and Consultant now desire to amend the Agreement to modify the Scope of Services,and increase the Contract Sum to One Million Three Hundred Five Thousand One Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty-six Cents. ($1,305,106.66).

The Parties therefore agree follows:

1. Amended Terms. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

1.1 The Scope of Services as set forth in Section 1.1 of and Exhibit A to the Agreement is hereby amended to include the Services set forth in Attachment “1”, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

1.2 The maximum compensation for the Services performed pursuant to this Amendment No. 4 shall not exceed Fifty-Seven Thousand Eighty Dollars ($57,080.00) thereby increasing the Contract Sum, as set forth in Section 2.1 of the Agreement, to One Million Three Hundred Five Thousand One Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty-six Cents. ($1,305,106.66).

Miscellaneous Provisions

2.1 Continued Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 43, all provisions of the Agreement, as amended by Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 4, whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement, as amended by Amendment Nos. 1 through 4. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of this Amendment No. 4 and the provisions of the Agreement or Amendments No. 1 through 4, the provisions of this Amendment No. 4 shall control.

2.2 Consideration for Amendment. The parties hereby agree that they have each received adequate and independent consideration for the modifications to the Agreement set forth in this Amendment No. 4.

2.3 Authority. The persons executing this Amendment No. 4 on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Amendment No. 4 on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Amendment No. 4, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Amendment No. 4, and (iv) entering into this Amendment No.

Docusign Envelope ID: 01A08EE0-B9E7-4A85-B399-92075202D3D3 789 933
4 does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which said party is bound.

1.3 Counterparts. This Amendment No. 4 may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be an original, but all of which together will constitute one instrument.

1.4 Electronic Signatures. Each Party may adopt as its signature an electronic identification consisting of a symbol or code that is affixed to or contained in each document transmitted by such Party (“electronic signature”). The Parties hereto herby agree that electronic signatures are acceptable, shall have the same force and effect under the law as original wet signatures, and shall be sufficient to verify that the Parties have executed this Agreement and such other documents transmitted by the Parties.
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
Docusign Envelope ID: 01A08EE0-B9E7-4A85-B399-92075202D3D3 790 934
The Parties are signing this Amendment No. 4 the date stated in the introductory clause.

CITY OF BANNING ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES, INC.

NAME:

TITLE:

NAME:

TITLE:

Robert Fisher,
Acting City Manager
City Council Approval: ___________
ATTEST:

Caroline Patton
Administrative City Clerk
NOTE: PROOF OF AUTHORITY TO BIND CONTRACTING PARTY REQUIRED.

APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE

BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY.

APPROVED AS TO FORM
Solvak, Baron, Empey, Murphy & Pinkney LLP
John O. Pinkley
City Attorney
Docusign Envelope ID: 01A08EE0-B9E7-4A85-B399-92075202D3D3 Stephanie Standerfer
Vice President
RESO 2025-068
791 935
ATTACHMENT “1”
Docusign Envelope ID: 01A08EE0-B9E7-4A85-B399-92075202D3D3 792 936
2020-0126
3788 McCray Street, Riverside, CA 92506 | P:951.686.1070 | F:951.788.1256 | www.webbassociates.com February 28, 2025
Revised April 23, 2025
Patrick Safari, CIP Manager
City of Banning
99 E. Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220
Sent via email: [email protected]
RE: Proposal for Contract Amendment No. 4 - Additional Environmental Services for Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project (PSA C00660)
Dear Patrick,
Pursuant to your request on February 6, 2025, and subsequent discussion on April 2, 2025, Albert A.

WEBB Associates (WEBB) is pleased to provide you with this proposal for additional services for the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project. WEBB is currently under contract with the City to obtain regulatory permits for the project from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB).

Said permits have requirements that the City will need to fulfill prior to construction of the project which are outlined below in Task 1. Biological reporting and monitoring that is required during construction are not included herein, but as we have discussed with you, we understand the City will include the permitting-related tasks during construction to be included in the City’s forthcoming construction management contract.

Also included in this request is the City’s obligation for compensatory mitigation related to impacts to jurisdictional waters which are required to be fulfilled within 18 months of impacts. Task 2 includes WEBB’s assistance with the compensatory mitigation obligations.

Docusign Envelope ID: 01A08EE0-B9E7-4A85-B399-92075202D3D3 793 937
WO: 2020-0126
City of Banning
Scope of Work
Task 1: Biological Services During Construction
The Tasks below are related to the surveying and reporting requirements of the CDFW permit, RWQCB permit, as well as CEQA mitigation measures MM BIO-1 through MM BIO-4.1 WEBB will subcontract with Osprey Environmental Associates (Osprey) to fulfill these requirements.

Preconstruction Nesting Bird Survey and Report (corresponds to CDFW Measures 2.11.1 and 4.4; CEQA MM BIO-1)
Osprey will conduct preconstruction nesting bird surveys if vegetation clearance occurs outside the recommended window (September 1 – February 1). Surveys will be performed within three (3) days prior to construction initiation to identify active nests within 100 feet of the project site. A survey report by a qualified biologist verifying nest status will be submitted to the City of Banning prior to construction. If active nests are identified, species-specific measures will be implemented to prevent nest abandonment.

Burrowing Owl Pre-Construction Inspection Survey and Report (corresponds to CDFW Measure 2.12.4 and CEQA MM BIO-2)
A single preconstruction burrowing owl survey will be conducted within 3 days of vegetation removal or ground disturbance. The survey will comply with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) and 2006 "Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions” and will cover entire the project site and within 150-meters. If burrowing owls are detected during the breeding season (February 1–August 31), a 300-foot buffer will be enforced around active burrows until nesting is complete. Following the survey, a burrowing owl pre-construction survey report will be prepared and submitted to WEBB in PDF format. The survey report will document the methods, results, and conclusion of the survey.

Crotch’s Bumble Bee (corresponds to CEQA MM BIO-3)
• Crotch’s Bumble Bee Habitat Mapping and Report (corresponds to CDFW Measure 2.14) Osprey will conduct habitat mapping for the Crotch’s bumblebee within the project footprint.

Mapping will identify habitat alliances following Sawyer et al. (2009). Following field mapping and no less than 120 days prior to the initiation of activities Osprey will complete and submit to CDFW a baseline habitat mapping report. The report will identify species composition for each mapped alliance and will be submitted to CDFW.
• Crotch’s Bumble Bee Draft Survey Plan (corresponds to CDFW Measure 2.15.2) A qualified Osprey biologist will prepare and submit to CDFW for review and comment a draft survey plan for Crotch’s bumble bee. The survey plan will identify the timing, number, and duration of survey efforts, and procedures to follow should Crotch’s bumble bee be detected within the project area. 1 There are a total of five mitigation measures for biological resources. MM BIO-5 is “Mitigation for Riparian/Riverine and Jurisdictional Impacts.” WEBB’s assistance with this is in Task 2, herein.

Docusign Envelope ID: 01A08EE0-B9E7-4A85-B399-92075202D3D3 794 938
WO: 2020-0126
City of Banning
The survey plan will be submitted no less than 90 days prior to initiation of project activities in suitable habitat.
• Crotch’s Bumble Bee Survey(s) and Report (corresponds to CDFW Measure 2.15.3) If habitat mapping identifies the presence of plants (e.g., genera Antirrhinum, Phacelia, Clarkia, Cordylanthus, Dendromecon, Eschscholzia, Eriogonum, Hypericum, Lantana, Lupinus, Salvia, Asclepias, Cirsium, Monardella, Keckiella, Acmispon, Euthamia, Ehrendorferia, Vicia, and/or Trichostema) or other suitable habitat (i.e. nesting, foraging, and overwintering habitat), Osprey will conduct focused surveys for the Crotch’s bumblebee (CBB) following the approval and submittal of survey plan. Osprey will first conduct a literature review and records search for CBB occurrences within a 10-mile radius, utilizing the CDFW California Natural Diversity Database and iNaturalist.

Following the literature review, Osprey will conduct on-site CBB surveys following the Survey Considerations for California Endangered Species Act Candidate Bumble Bee Species (CDFW 2023). These surveys will take place during the Colony Active Period (April-August) and when floral resources are available, ideally at peak bloom. A minimum of three surveys will be conducted, spaced 2-4 weeks apart between April and August. Surveys will be performed during daylight, beginning at least one hour after sunrise and ending at least two hours before sunset, ideally between 9:00 AM and 1:00 PM, with temperatures between 65°F and 90°F and wind speeds under 8 miles per hour. Each survey will cover at least one person-hour of search effort per three acres of suitable habitat.

Following the completion of the surveys, a report will be prepared summarizing the survey methods, findings, and conclusions. The report will also include a list of bee species observed and any accompanying photographs. Survey results will be submitted to CDFW before ground-disturbing activities begin. If an active CBB nest is detected, a no-disturbance buffer zone will be established, and CDFW will be notified.

Biological Worker’s Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) and Invasive Species Education Program (corresponds to CDFW Measures 2.8 and 2.8.1; CEQA MM BIO-4) Osprey will develop and conduct a mandatory Biological Worker’s Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) training for all construction personnel. This training will cover key topics, including CBB, burrowing owls, rare plant species, and riparian/riverine features. WEAP training will be coordinated with the paleontological WEAP. A recorded training will be prepared and available.

Further, included in the WEAP will be an additional discussion of the invasive species currently present within the project site as well as those that may pose a threat to or have the potential to invade the Project site. The discussion will include a physical description of each species and information regarding their habitat preferences, local and statewide distribution, modes of dispersal, and impacts. The invasive species education program will also include a discussion of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be implemented at the Project site to avoid the introduction and spread of invasive species into and out of the Project site.

Docusign Envelope ID: 01A08EE0-B9E7-4A85-B399-92075202D3D3 795 939
WO: 2020-0126
City of Banning
WEBB Management of Biological Services
WEBB has budgeted 40 hours to manage and coordinate with Osprey related to Task 1 including reviewing documents, and meeting with the City.

UAV (Drone) Survey(s) (Optional)
Osprey can provide a drone survey of the project area to generate a high-resolution orthomosaic basemap, offering a temporally and spatially accurate depiction of the project site as is currently prior to construction and post-construction. This updated imagery can serve as a key reference for stakeholders, ensuring precise visualization of project lands, roads, and planned or constructed infrastructure. The orthomosaic will enhance project planning, coordination, and decision-making by delivering highly accurate spatial and visual data. The flight will be conducted by an Osprey FAA-licensed Remote Pilot in Command (RPIC) and a visual observer, ensuring full compliance with FAA regulations. The drone data collection and subsequent GIS analysis will be used to support all of Osprey’s reporting deliverables included herein. Deliverables will include a high-resolution orthomosaic base map, digital terrain model depicting project ground elevations, and a digital surface model depicting project surface elevations.

Although a temporally and spatially accurate orthomosaic basemap is informative and helpful, this optional service is not required in order to complete any of the aforementioned tasks.

Task 1 Assumptions
• None of the species identified above will be found on site. • This scope includes one (1) in-person WEAP training. Any additional training sessions will require a separate scope and fee.
• Materials required for delineating Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) or establishing nesting buffers are not included in this proposal. The cost of these materials will be billed directly to the client if not provided by the City.
• The preparation of a Burrowing Owl Mitigation Plan is not included. If required, Osprey will provide a separate scope and fee for this task.
• This proposal does not cover small mammal trapping or the preparation of a small mammal trapping survey report. If required, Osprey will provide an additional scope and fee for these efforts.
• Assistance with securing an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) from CDFW is not included. If required, Osprey can provide a separate scope and fee for this task.

Task 2: WEBB Assistance with Offsite Compensatory Mitigation Fulfillment (corresponds to CDFW Measure 3.3; CEQA MM BIO-5)
WEBB has included 50 hours to help the City to set up its compensatory mitigation obligation utilizing an offsite mitigation site owned by the City located southeast of the City’s wastewater treatment plant. We anticipate actions under this task will be to advise and support the City related to: finding a third party to hold a conservation easement/deed restriction(s) on the City’s property (City to retain Docusign Envelope ID: 01A08EE0-B9E7-4A85-B399-92075202D3D3 796 940
WO: 2020-0126
City of Banning
fee title), negotiate and find the City a third party land manager and assist City with said agreement, and finding an entity to provide a non-wasting endowment. We understand the City will take lead on each of these tasks; therefore this budget is for things like attending meetings to provide project background and making connections to facilitate the process.

Budget
Our proposed budget for the services listed herein will be billed on a Time and Materials basis according to our existing contract for a total not to exceed of $57,080.

Environmental Services
Task 1 - Biological Services
Preconstruction Nesting Bird Survey and Report $ 4,660
Burrowing Owl Pre-Construction Inspection Survey and Report $ 6,230 Crotch’s Bumble Bee Habitat Mapping and Report $ 6,840
Crotch’s Bumble Bee Draft Survey Plan $ 4,350
Crotch’s Bumble Bee Survey(s) and Report $ 14,380
WEBB Management of Task 1 (40 hours) $ 7,150
Optional UAV (Drone) Survey $ 4,370
Task 2 - Management and Coordination for Offsite Mitigation $ 9,100 TOTAL $ 57,080
The following is a summary of original, current, and proposed authorizations according to our records.

WEBB Original Authorization: $548,416.05 plus $54,841.61 contingency for total of $603,725.66
Change Order No. 1 $24,983.25 (subtracted from contingency) Change Order No. 2 $5,974.88 (subtracted from contingency) City Council Resolution 2022-106 $129,400 (rescinded)
City Council Resolution 2022-139 $148,222
Change Order No. 3 $496,079
Current Authorization $1,248,026.66
Proposed Change Order $57,080
Total WEBB Authorization with Proposed
Change Order $1,305,106.66
Docusign Envelope ID: 01A08EE0-B9E7-4A85-B399-92075202D3D3 797 941
WO: 2020-0126
City of Banning
If you find this request acceptable, please issue a contract amendment to our office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to the City and look forward to hearing from you. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please call me at (951) 830-4305.

Sincerely,
ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
Dilesh Sheth, PE, TE
Senior Vice President
[email protected]
Copy: Stephanie Standerfer
Autumn DeWoody
Docusign Envelope ID: 01A08EE0-B9E7-4A85-B399-92075202D3D3 798 942
WO: 2020-0126
City of Banning
Page | 6
Docusign Envelope ID: 01A08EE0-B9E7-4A85-B399-92075202D3D3 799 943
AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
(C00660) FOR THE DESIGN OF SUN LAKES BOULEVARD

EXTENSION BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF BANNING AND ALBERT
A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES (“Amendment No. 5”) by and between the CITY OF BANNING (“City”) and ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES, a California Corporation (“Consultant”) is effective as of this day: ______________.

RECITALS
A. City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement for Professional Design Services dated June 23, 2020 (“Agreement”) whereby Consultant agreed to provide Design Services for the Design of Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension following a Request for Proposals for an amount not to exceed Five-Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Four Hundred Sixteen Dollars and Five Cents ($548,416.05). The agreement included a 10% Contingency of Fifty-Four Thousand Eight Hundred Forty One Dollars and Sixty-One Cents ($54,841.61) for a total contract amount of Six Hundred Three Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty-Five Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($603,725.66). The Term of the Agreement was to commence on June 23, 2020, and continue in full force and effect until October 3, 2022.

B. On February 11, 2022, Public Works Department approved a change order to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for out-ofscope work including coordination with Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) in the amount of $24,983.25, leaving a contingency balance of $29,858.36.

C. On March 21, 2022, Public Works Department approved a change order to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for the preparation of a sediment transport analysis (out of scope) in the amount of $5,974.88, leaving a contingency balance of $23,883.48.

D. On August 23,2022 City Council adopted City Council Resolution 2022-106 which authorized the increase in compensation for services provided under the Agreement by One Hundred Twenty-Nine Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($129,400.00).

E. On October 11, 2022, City Council Adopted City Council Resolution 2022-139 to rescind Resolution 2022-106 and amend the Agreement to include additional compensation in the amount of One Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Two Hundred Twenty-Two Dollars ($148,222.00) for a new contract total of Seven Hundred FiftyOne Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-Seven Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($751,947.66) and to extend the term of the Agreement through June 30, 2024.

F. On October 23, 2023, City and Consultant amended the Agreement to modify the Scope of Services, extend the Term of the Agreement to June 30, 2025, and increase the Contract Sum by Four Hundred Ninety-Six Thousand Seventy-Nine Dollars Docusign Envelope ID: 6C4E2DC9-7A2D-4C5F-852D-CE941C03BB50 8/21/2025
800 922
($496,079.00) for a total not to exceed amount of One Million Two Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Twenty-Six Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($1,248,026.66).

G. On January 6, 2025, City and Consultant amended the Agreement to extend the Term of the Agreement to June 30, 2026.

H. On May 27, 2025, City and Consultant amended the Agreement to modify the Scope of Services and increase the Contract Sum to One Million Three Hundred Five Thousand One Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents. ($1,305,106.66) as approved by City Council Resolution No. 2025-070.

I. City and Consultant now desire to amend the Agreement to modify the Scope of Services and increase the Contract Sum to One Million Three Hundred Sixty-Four Thousand Seven Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents. ($1,364,706.66).

The Parties therefore agree follows:

1. Amended Terms. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

1.1 The Scope of Services as set forth in Section 1.1 of and Exhibit A to the Agreement is hereby amended to include the Services set forth in Attachment “1”, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

1.2 The maximum compensation for the Services performed pursuant to this Amendment No. 4 shall not exceed Fifty-Nine Thousand Six Hundred Dollars ($59,600.00) thereby increasing the Contract Sum, as set forth in Section 2.1 of the Agreement, to One Million Three Hundred Sixty-Four Thousand Seven Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents. ($1,364,706.66).

Miscellaneous Provisions

2.1 Continued Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 5, all provisions of the Agreement, as amended by Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 5, whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement, as amended by Amendment Nos. 1 through 5. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of this Amendment No. 5 and the provisions of the Agreement or Amendments No. 1 through 5, the provisions of this Amendment No. 5 shall control.

2.2 Consideration for Amendment. The parties hereby agree that they have each received adequate and independent consideration for the modifications to the Agreement set forth in this Amendment No. 5.

2.3 Authority. The persons executing this Amendment No. 5 on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Amendment No. 5 on behalf of said party, Docusign Envelope ID: 6C4E2DC9-7A2D-4C5F-852D-CE941C03BB50 801 923
(iii) by so executing this Amendment No. 5, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Amendment No. 5, and (iv) entering into this Amendment No. 5 does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which said party is bound.

1.3 Counterparts. This Amendment No. 5 may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be an original, but all of which together will constitute one instrument.

1.4 Electronic Signatures. Each Party may adopt as its signature an electronic identification consisting of a symbol or code that is affixed to or contained in each document transmitted by such Party (“electronic signature”). The Parties hereto herby agree that electronic signatures are acceptable, shall have the same force and effect under the law as original wet signatures, and shall be sufficient to verify that the Parties have executed this Agreement and such other documents transmitted by the Parties.
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
Docusign Envelope ID: 6C4E2DC9-7A2D-4C5F-852D-CE941C03BB50 802 924
The Parties are signing this Amendment No. 5 the date stated in the introductory clause.

CITY OF BANNING ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES, INC
NAME:

TITLE:

NAME:

TITLE:

Arturo Vela,
Acting City Manager
City Council Approval: ____________
ATTEST:

Sandra Calderon,
Acting Administrative City Clerk
NOTE: PROOF OF AUTHORITY TO BIND CONTRACTING PARTY REQUIRED.

APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE

BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6C4E2DC9-7A2D-4C5F-852D-CE941C03BB50 Vice President
Stephanie Standerfer
2025-116
803 925
3788 McCray Street, Riverside, CA 92506 | P:951.686.1070 | F:951.788.1256 | www.webbassociates.com August 8, 2025
Patrick Safari, CIP Manager
City of Banning
99 E. Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220
Sent via email: [email protected]
RE: Proposal for Contract Amendment No. 6 - Additional Environmental and Engineering Services for Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project (PSA C00660) Dear Patrick,
Pursuant to our discussion on July 3, 2025 and August 5, 2025, Albert A. WEBB Associates (WEBB) is pleased to provide you with this proposal for additional services for the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project. The previous contract amendment authorized WEBB to conduct surveys for the Crotch’s bumble bee (Bombus crotchii, CBB) within the Project limits. CBB is a candidate for listing under the California Endangered Species Act and therefore treated as a listed species by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). The surveys were needed to comply with the Project’s CEQA mitigation measures and the forthcoming Streambed Alteration Agreement from CDFW. WEBB partnered with Osprey Environmental Associates who maintains the required credentials to survey for CBB.

The bee was found within the Project limits on June 27, 2025. Therefore, this contract amendment reflects the anticipation that the City will need an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) for CBB from CDFW and that the offsite mitigation proposed for mitigating the Project’s jurisdictional impacts may also be required to include mitigation for CBB.

In addition, the City has been coordinating with Kinder Morgan on the relocation of their fuel lines within the Sun Lake Boulevard project limits. Last week, Kinder Morgan requested that the slope be moved 50 feet to the north along the eastern project boundary. This proposed change will require revisions to the street improvement plans, including the relocation of the storm drain outlet. In addition, preparation of the slope & drainage and the temporary construction easement documents. The City is requesting a contract amendment to revise the street & storm drain improvement plans and easement document to accommodate Kinder Morgan’s request.

Finally, the City is preparing for pre-construction and construction surveys and has requested WEBB to provide archaeological and paleontological support for CEQA mitigation measures MM CR-1 (Monitoring and Inadvertent Discovery), MM GEO-1 (Paleontological Worker Environmental Awareness Program), and MM GEO-2 (Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program).

Scope of Work
Task 1: Incidental Take Permit (ITP) Application
Osprey will prepare a complete ITP application that addresses potential impacts to CBB. The ITP application will include the following components:

1. Project Description
A detailed description of the proposed project, including scope, purpose, construction activities, and schedule, emphasizing elements relevant to biological resources and potential impacts to CBB.

ATTACHMENT "1" A -1
Docusign Envelope ID: 6C4E2DC9-7A2D-4C5F-852D-CE941C03BB50 804 926
2020-0126
City of Banning
2 2. Project Location
A clear and accurate description of the project location, including jurisdiction, parcel boundaries, and regional context. GIS-based mapping will support this section, showing the spatial relationship of project elements to known CBB habitat.

3. Take Analysis
Assess the likelihood, nature, and extent of incidental take resulting from proposed project activities. This will include direct (e.g., crushing during grading) and indirect (e.g., habitat degradation) take mechanisms and their anticipated frequency and scale.

4. Impact Analysis
Evaluate the biological significance of the anticipated take, with an emphasis on how project-related impacts may affect local CBB populations. This will include discussion of habitat quality, floral resource availability, and the role of the site in the species’ life cycle.

5. Jeopardy Analysis
Assess whether issuance of the ITP would jeopardize the continued existence of CBB. This analysis will include:
• A review of known population trends and range contractions • Evaluation of existing threats to CBB (e.g., pesticides, habitat loss) • Consideration of cumulative impacts from related or nearby projects (*if data is available) • An assessment of how project mitigation and minimization measures offset potential risk to the species’ long-term survival and reproductive success

6. Minimization and Mitigation Measures
Propose feasible and enforceable measures to avoid, minimize, and fully mitigate impacts. These may include:
• Seasonal work windows
• Designated biologist oversight
• Daily biological sweeps
• No-disturbance buffers around observed individuals or nests • Restoration or enhancement of temporarily disturbed habitat • Permanent preservation of habitat at a 1:1 or greater ratio

7. Monitoring and Reporting Plan
Develop a monitoring plan to document implementation and effectiveness of all minimization and mitigation measures. This may include photo documentation, habitat success criteria, and adaptive management triggers.

8. Funding and Implementation
Describe the funding sources and financial assurances that are available to fully implement the ITP requirements, including habitat restoration, long-term management, and any required endowment contributions.

Osprey will be available to coordinate directly with CDFW staff throughout the application process to facilitate review and respond to any requests for additional information. We will prepare and submit the ATTACHMENT "1" A -2
Docusign Envelope ID: 6C4E2DC9-7A2D-4C5F-852D-CE941C03BB50 805 927
2020-0126
City of Banning
3 ITP package in a format consistent with CDFW’s current guidelines and expectations. This scope assumes up to two meetings will be required to discuss the findings and ITP application.

Task 2: CBB Habitat Assessment of Offsite Mitigation Site (APNs 532-180-049 and -017)
The City owns two parcels that have been identified in the Project’s regulatory permit applications to serve as offsite mitigation for jurisdictional impacts. The riparian/riverine portions of these parcels have already been surveyed by Osprey for suitability as mitigation for jurisdictional impacts; however, the survey did not assess whether it also contained suitable habitat for mitigation for CBB. Therefore, Osprey will conduct a biological assessment of the parcels to evaluate their suitability to support CBB habitat. This task will include both a comprehensive desktop review and a reconnaissance-level field assessment.

The desktop review will include a thorough analysis of relevant environmental databases and datasets, including but not limited to the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and applicable citizen science databases such as iNaturalist and the Xerces Society’s California Bumble Bee Atlas. This review will assess the historical and recent documentation of CBB in the vicinity of the proposed mitigation parcels.

Following the literature review, Osprey biologists will conduct a field-based reconnaissance survey by foot to assess site conditions and determine habitat suitability for CBB. The survey will evaluate the presence and quality of key habitat features such as floral diversity and abundance, availability of nesting substrates (e.g., rodent burrows, thatch layers), and potential overwintering habitat. All blooming species observed will be recorded and mapped using GPS and/or GIS, and vegetation communities will be broadly classified to inform mitigation potential.

Upon completion of these efforts, Osprey will prepare a summary letter report detailing the findings of both the desktop and field assessments. The report will include a habitat suitability evaluation, mapped habitat features, and a discussion of the site’s potential to serve as suitable mitigation for CBB under the California Endangered Species Act. This information will serve as baseline data to inform future coordination with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and support Incidental Take Permit planning and review processes.

Task 3: Task 3. UAV (Drone) Survey(s) (Optional)
As an optional task, Osprey can perform a drone-based aerial survey of the two mitigation parcels identified in Task 2 to generate a high-resolution orthomosaic basemap. This product will provide a current, spatially accurate representation of site conditions, aiding in the visualization of habitat features and supporting documentation for mitigation planning.

The UAV survey will be conducted by an Osprey FAA-licensed Remote Pilot in Command (RPIC), accompanied by a qualified visual observer, in full compliance with FAA Part 107 regulations. Collected imagery will be processed into georeferenced orthomosaics suitable for GIS integration. The resulting basemap will enhance coordination with regulatory agencies, support comparative analyses over time, and provide a detailed visual record for future project documentation.

ATTACHMENT "1" A -3
Docusign Envelope ID: 6C4E2DC9-7A2D-4C5F-852D-CE941C03BB50 806 928
2020-0126
City of Banning
4 Drone survey data can be integrated into all deliverables prepared under Task 1 and Task 2 and will serve as a valuable resource for informing future monitoring, restoration planning, or adaptive management efforts on the mitigation parcels.

Task 4: WEBB Meetings and Coordination
WEBB has included 28 hours for meetings and coordination associated with Tasks 1-3 and Task 6. This includes reviewing documents, attending meetings, and coordinating with the City, and Morongo Band of Missions Indians for the tribal monitoring services agreement.

Task 5: Revise Street & Storm Drain Improvement Plans and Prepare Easement Documents
As part of the contract amendment, we will revise the street and storm drain improvement plans for the Sun Lake Boulevard project to incorporate design changes requested by Kinder Morgan. They have asked for the top of the slope to be moved 50 feet to the north along the eastern project boundary to accommodate the relocation of their existing fuel lines. In response, we will coordinate with the City to confirm the revised alignment and any right-of-way impacts. We will update the street improvement plans to reflect the new slope location and associated grading modifications. Additionally, we will revise the storm drain system design, including the relocation of the existing storm drain outlet and any affected infrastructure. We will prepare the slope & drainage and temporary construction easement (TCE) legal and plats. Our scope includes updating the relevant plan sheets, profiles, and details; providing revised quantities and construction cost estimates; and submitting the updated plans and easement documents for City review. We will also incorporate one round of review comments as part of this task.

Task 6: Archaeological and Paleontological Mitigation Measures WEBB will partner with CRM Tech to provide the City with the qualified archaeologists and paleontologists in order to fulfill CEQA mitigation measures MM CR-1 (Monitoring and Inadvertent Discovery), MM GEO1 (Paleontological Worker Environmental Awareness Program), and MM GEO-2 (Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program).

Scope of Work: Preparation of the Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program Document CEQA mitigation measure MM GEO-2 states that prior to the commencement of ground-disturbing activities, the Project Paleontologist (retained under MM GEO-1) shall prepare and implement a Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) for the Project. The PRIMP will describe the monitoring required during excavations that extend into locations of areas deemed to have a high paleontological resource potential, which include older Holocene-age and Pleistocene-age alluvial deposits. To meet the requirement to develop this document for this project, CRM TECH will review pertinent geological and paleontological documents available for the project area and vicinity and review the geotechnical study completed for the project as well as the site plan and grading plans. This information will be synthesized into a site-specific Program document that will outline the procedures for paleontological monitoring and for the proper treatment of all paleontological resources that may be encountered while monitoring the earth-disturbing activities associated with the project, as per the conditions for this project.

ATTACHMENT "1" A -4
Docusign Envelope ID: 6C4E2DC9-7A2D-4C5F-852D-CE941C03BB50 807 929
2020-0126
City of Banning
5 Scope of Work: Preparing and Presenting the Paleontological Worker’s Environmental Awareness Program
CEQA mitigation measure MM GEO-1 states that in order to educate the construction contractor and each of the construction crews about the types of paleontological resources that may be encountered along the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project, prior to the start of the construction, the City of Banning shall retain a professional paleontologist (the “Project Paleontologist”) to prepare a Paleontological Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP). The Paleontological WEAP shall be taped and presented to any construction crew members not present at the preconstruction meeting during which it was initially presented prior to such crew members working on the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project. To prepare for and present the training program, CRM TECH will review the available paleontological information for the study area and vicinity; collect information about the types fossils that might be present in the project area; gather examples of fossils (or photographs of fossils), maps, contact information, and other data for use during the training session; review and compile information regarding the monitoring activities including safety measures and the procedures to be followed during ground disturbance in sensitive areas and protocols that apply in the event that resources are discovered. This information will be assembled so that it can be presented in an easily understood, comprehensive Worker Environmental Awareness Program regarding paleontological resources.

Budget
Our proposed budget for the services listed herein will be billed on a not-to-exceed time and materials (T&M) basis according to our existing contract for a total not to exceed of $59,600.

Environmental & Engineering Services Fee
Task 1. (Osprey) Preparation of CDFW ITP Application for the Crotch’s Bumble Bee $ 15,530 Task 2.
(Osprey) Biological Assessment for Potential Crotch’s Bumblebee Mitigation Site(s) APNs: 532-180-049 & 532-180-017 $ 5,750
Task 3. (Osprey) UAV (Drone) Survey (Optional) $ 1,960
Task 4.
(WEBB) meetings and coordination, and tribal monitoring services agreement with Morongo Band of Mission Indians $ 5,690
Task 5.
(WEBB) Revise Street & Storm Drain Improvement Plans and Prepare Easement Documents $ 25,540
Task 6. (CRM Tech) Prepare PRIMP; Prepare and Present Paleontological WEAP $ 5,130 TOTAL $ 59,600
ATTACHMENT "1" A -5
Docusign Envelope ID: 6C4E2DC9-7A2D-4C5F-852D-CE941C03BB50 808 930
2020-0126
City of Banning
6 The following is a summary of original, current, and proposed authorizations according to our records.

WEBB Original Authorization: $548,416.05 plus $54,841.61 contingency for total of $603,725.66
Change Order No. 1 $24,983.25 (subtracted from contingency) Change Order No. 2 $5,974.88 (subtracted from contingency) City Council Resolution 2022-106 $129,400 (rescinded)
City Council Resolution 2022-139 $148,222
Change Order No. 4 $496,079
Change Order No. 5 $57,080
Current Authorization $1,305,106.66
Proposed Change Order $59,600
Proposed Authorization $1,364,706.66
If you find this request acceptable, please issue a contract amendment to our office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to the City and look forward to hearing from you. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please call me at (951) 830-4305.

Sincerely,
ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
Dilesh Sheth, PE, TE
Senior Vice President
[email protected]
Copy: Stephanie Standerfer
Autumn DeWoody
ATTACHMENT "1" A -6
Docusign Envelope ID: 6C4E2DC9-7A2D-4C5F-852D-CE941C03BB50 809 931
810
811

CHANGE ORDER
Change Order No. 2
Purchase Order No. 030269
Date 1/ 25/022
Agreement Date 6/ 23/020
Sheet 1 of 2
Owner: CITY OF BANNING
Project: 2020- 04 Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension
Contractor: Albert A. Webb and Associates
The following changes are hereby made to the Contract Documents:

JUSTIFICATIONS:

Out of scope work. Sediment Transport Study was needed to assess the potential sediment transport capacity at the proposed arched culverts crossings.
812

CHANGE TO CON TRACT PRICE
Original Contract Price
Contract Price adjusted by previous
Change Order( s)
Contract Price due to this Change Order will
be ( increased)
New Contract Price including this Change Order

CHANGE TO CONTRACT TIME
Contract Time will be ( increased) Date
for Completion of all Work

APPROVALS REQUIRED
548, 416. 05
573, 399.0
5, 974. 88
579, 374. 18
12/ 31/ 2022
Current
580
Working Days) (Date) •
To be effective, this order must be approved by the Owner, or as may otherwise be required by the Supplemental General Conditions.

Recommended by:

Approved by:
geti,„ Y -63 - Date: II o2h l
aozz
Date: 1 Z Z
813
May 3, 2022
Mr. Patrick Safari
City of Banning
99 E. Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220
RE: Request for Change Order for Additional Engineering and Environmental Services for the Sun Lakes Blvd. Extension Project (C00660) Dear Patrick,
Albert A. WEBB Associates respectfully submit this change order for Engineering and Environmental Services for the Sun Lakes Blvd. Extension Project (C00660).

WEBB has been contracted by the City of Banning to provide engineering and environmental services for the Sun Lakes Blvd. Extension Project. The following are outof-scope additional task items provided by WEBB:
• Street Improvement, Storm Drain Design, and Environmental Coordination for Wildlife/Resource Agencies review and Sunset Crossroads Project Coordination • Storm Drain System Design
• Supplemental Environmental Documentation
• Jurisdictional Delineating and Permitting
At this time, we are respectfully requesting compensation for the tasks already completed, and the future tasks to be completed as outlined below.

814
EXHIBIT “A” SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1 - Street Improvement, Storm Drain Design, and Environmental Coordination for Wildlife/Resource Agencies review and Sunset Crossroads Project Coordination

1. Attend meetings with City and Sunset Crossroads design team. • Original Proposal: Not in scope, Additional Cost: $4,644

2. Review Sunset Crossroads preliminary on-site design layout. • Original Proposal: Not in scope, Additional Cost: $3,666

3. Prepare and provide electronic CAD files to Sunset Crossroads design team. • Original Proposal: Not in scope, Additional Cost: $896

4. Coordinate with bridge consultant to determine appropriate spans and type selection (arched culverts). • Original Proposal: Not in scope, Additional Cost: $1,120

5. Coordinate with environmental team and biologist for determining new impacts from revised culvert design.
• Original Proposal: Not in scope, Additional Cost: $790

6. Coordinate with environmental team to determine alternative alignments and spans for minimizing impacts.
• Original Proposal: Not in scope, Additional Cost: $1,792

7. Coordinate with design team to prepare for resource agency meetings. • Original Proposal: Not in scope, Additional Cost: $713

8. Meet and coordinate with Wildlife/Resource Agencies
• Original Proposal: Not in scope, Additional Cost: $713

9. Coordinate and schedule meeting with Sunset Crossroads design team for environmental analysis approach.
• Original Proposal: Not in scope, Additional Cost: $448

10. Coordinate with sediment transport consultant for scour memo and/or detailed analysis. a. Review Geotechnical Report with consultant
b. Review existing particle size distribution for channel bed. • Original Proposal: Not in scope, Additional Cost $1,344 Task 2 – Storm Drain System Design

2.1 - Final Drainage Report – Additional work items include:
a. Update preliminary hydraulic and scour calculations for the revised culvert footprint. b. Prepare hydraulic analysis for mimicking the existing hydraulic conditions at the existing roadway crossings.
c. Update preliminary report for the new concept and additional analysis. • Original Proposal: Included in scope but revisions required as a result of revised culvert design, Additional Cost: $10,304

2.2 - Storm Drain Plans – Additional work items include:
a. Update design layout of culvert and culvert inlet and outlet wing walls, headwalls, aprons, access ramps, riprap, and other elements for new culvert concept. b. Update design layout and details for mimicking existing hydraulic conditions at existing roadway crossings.
815
• Original Proposal: Included in scope but revisions required as a result of revised culvert design, Additional Cost: $34,944

2.3 - Structural Design Allowance – Additional work items include:
a. Prepare structural design calculations and details, as needed, for culverts, wingwalls, headwall, parapet, and energy dissipaters where standard details are not applicable. • Original Proposal: Not in scope, Additional Cost: $34,792 Task 3 – Supplemental Environmental Documentation

Following preparation of the draft Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment for the Sun Lakes Boulevard Realignment Project, November 2020 (the Draft Phase 1 CRA) and the biological resources studies, the Project footprint has expanded due to the new culvert concept and the addition of access to the City’s substation being and grading along the west side of Sunset Avenue. This has resulted in an expanded Project footprint that was not evaluated in the Draft Phase I CRA or the biological resources studies.

3.1 - Supplemental Cultural Resources Study – Additional work items include:
a. Applied Earthworks (AE), WEBB’s cultural resources subconsultant will conduct a complete and intensive cultural resource survey of the expanded Project footprint. Two previously documented cultural resources (a large farm/ranch complex and a large historic water-control complex) are located within the expanded Project area. AE will confirm the location of these previously identified resources in proximity to the expanded Project area and assess their current condition. b. AE will update the draft Phase I CRA to include the expanded Project footprint. This scope include two rounds of comments following City review of the draft updated Phase I CRA and no major revisions will be required. The draft updated Phase I CRA will be submitted electronically in MS Word format for ease of review; the final updated Phase I CRA will be submitted electronically as a PDF file. • Original Proposal: Included in scope but revisions required as a result of revised culvert design, Additional Cost: $3,646

3.2 - Supplemental Biological Resources Studies – Additional work items include:
a. Wood Environment Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. (Wood), WEBB’s biological resources subconsultant will revise the figures and exhibits, recalculate impacts, and update the previously submitted draft versions of the following reports to include the expanded Project footprint. Habitat Assessment/Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Consistency Analysis, Focused Burrowing Owl Survey, Narrow Endemic and Criterial Area Plants Survey, Los Angeles Pocket Mouse Protocol Survey. The Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP), which is in process, will also be revised to include the expanded Project footprint. b. The updated draft reports will be submitted electronically for ease of review; the final updated reports will be submitted electronically as PDF files.
• Original Proposal: Included in Scope but revisions required as a result of revised culvert design, Additional Cost: $19,336
816

3.3 - Additional Environmental Coordination – Additional work items include:

Subsequent to the initial meeting with the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) and the Wildlife/Resource Agencies, WEBB’s environmental staff coordinated with the Wildlife/Resource Agencies to provide the hydraulic modeling results and assist City staff in responding to agency questions. WEBB will also assist the City in shepherding this project through the DBESP process with the Wildlife/Resource Agencies.
• Original Proposal: Included in Scope but revisions required as a result of revised culvert design, Additional Cost: $12,430

3.4 - CEQA Documentation Updates – Additional work items include:

Because the design of the culverts delayed the design progress and over a year has gone by since the draft CEQA document was prepared, as well as given the updates to the project design/footprint and the need to update the cultural and biological and JD studies, additional budget is needed to further process the MND. Budget for all the additional meetings and coordination related the crossings took budget away from the CEQA task. We are asking for an additional task authorization to update the draft MND, and process it for public review through a Final MND.
• Original Proposal: Included in Scope but revisions required as a result of revised culvert design, Additional Cost: $11,952
Task 4 - Jurisdictional Delineation and Permitting
The original field surveys for the jurisdictional delineation were completed summer 2021, exhibits prepared, impacts calculated, and these results were presented to the resource agencies and used to develop the new culvert concept. In order to complete the jurisdictional delineation report, additional work items include:
a. Survey and map jurisdictional resources within the expanded Project footprint. b. Prepare revised exhibits for use in the report.
• Original Proposal: Included in Scope but revisions required as a result of revised culvert design, Additional Cost: $4,692
817
EXHIBIT “B” COMPENSATION FOR SCOPE OF SERVICES
Total fees for services shown in the Scope of Services (Exhibit “A”) shall not exceed $148,222 without prior authorization from client. We propose to provide details in Exhibit “A” for an initial Time & Materials fee to be billed monthly in accordance with the attached fee schedule.

Task 1: Street, Storm, Environmental Coordination $16,126 Task 2: Storm Drain System Design $80,040
Task 3: Supplemental Environmental Documentation $47,364 Task 4: Jurisdicational Delineation and Permitting $4,692 Total $148,222

Task budgets are estimates and may be used interchangeably as needed but not to exceed the budget total.

Any additional services requested outside this scope will be provided under separate contract addenda for additional fees. Invoices will be submitted monthly based on the percentage of work completed. All invoices shall be due and payable upon receipt. If invoices remain unpaid after 30 days, work on project may cease and interest of 1.5% per month shall be charged on unpaid balances.

Charges for deliveries, printing, copying, mileage, postage, outside services, and for coordination or other services not specifically listed in the scope of work (Reimbursable Expenses), will be billed on a time and material basis, in accordance with our Schedule of Fees. Checking and/or filing fees are not included in this contract and shall be paid by the client directly to the appropriate governmental agency.

Charges for printing, copying, mileage, postage, outside services, and for coordination or other services not specifically listed in the scope of work (Reimbursable Expenses), will be billed on a time and material basis, in accordance with our Schedule of Fees. Checking and/or filing fees are not included in this contract and shall be paid by the client directly to the appropriate agency.

If you find this request acceptable, please issue contract amendment #1 with the current dollar amount to the Final Engineering Services contract dated June 23, 2020. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to your firm and look forward to hearing from you. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please contact us at 951-320-6063.

Sincerely,

ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
Eugene Abrego, PE
Senior Engineer
818
Item Description
Stephanie Standerfer
Cheryl DeGano
Autumn DeWoody
Eric Hays
Eugene Abrego
Ranjit Singh
Total Hours
Subtotal - Labor
Sub-consultant
budget
Total/task
Billout Rate $ 224 265 $ 171 $ 224 $ 224 $ 224 $
Task 1 - Field Survey Street/Storm/Env. Design Coordination 8 14 2 6 21 20 71 $ 16,126 $ - $ 16,126

1.1 Attend Meetings 4 4 2 6 4 20 $ - 4,644 $ 4,644 $

1.2 Review of Sunset Crossroads Project 2 2 2 8 2 16 $ - 3,666 $ 3,666 $ 1.3 Preparation of CAD files 4 4 $ - 896 $ 896 $

1.4 Coodination with Bridge Consultant 1 4 5 $ - 1,120 $ 1,120 $

1.5 Coordination with Biologist 2 2 4 $ - 790 $ 790 $

1.6 Alternative Culvert Alignment Analysis 2 2 4 8 $ - 1,792 $ 1,792 $

1.7 Coordination for Resource Agency Meetings 1 2 3 $ - 713 $ 713 $

1.8 Meet and Coordinate with Wildlife/Resource Aencies 1 2 3 $ - 713 $ 713 $ 1.9 Coordination and Meetings with SC Env. Team 2 2 $ - 448 $ 448 $

1.10 Coordination with Sediment Transport Subconsultant 6 6 $ - 1,344 $ 1,344 $ Task 2 - Description (Phase XXXX) Storm Drain System Design 40 170 210 $ 47,040 $ 33,000 $ 80,040

2.1 Final Draiange Report 16 30 46 $ - 10,304 $ 10,304 $

2.2 Storm Drain Plans 16 140 156 $ - 34,944 $ 34,944 $

2.3 Structural Design Allowance 8 8 $ 1,792 $ 33,000 $ 34,792 Task 3 - CEQA Compliance Services Supplemental Environmental Services 46 58 12 116 $ 27,234 $ 20,130 $ 47,364

3.1 Supplemental Cultural Resources Study 4 4 $ 2,750 896 $ 3,646 $

3.2 Supplemental Biological Resources Studies 4 4 8 $ 17,380 1,956 $ 19,336 $

3.3 Additional Environmental Coordination 30 20 50 $ - 12,430 $ 12,430 $

3.4 CEQA Document Updates and Processing 12 30 12 54 $ - 11,952 $ 11,952 $ Task 4 - Jurisdicational Delineation and Permitting 4 4 16 24 $ 4,692 $ - $ 4,692

4.1 Additional Survey, Mapping, Impact Calculation 4 4 16 24 $ - 4,692 $ 4,692 $ Total 58 76 30 46 21 190 421 $ 95,092 $ 53,130 $ 148,222 Sun Laked Blvd. Extension Change Order - 2
H:\2020\20-0126\Proposals, Contracts, & Change Orders\Change Orders\CO-2\Sun Laked CO2 Budget_20220420.xlsx 5/3/20227:30 AM 819
G:\Proposals\FORMAL PROPOSALS\City of Banning\015921 Sun Lakes Change Order\Sun Lakes _Additional Engineering and Env Services_2023-07-06.docx July 6, 2023
Mr. Patrick Safari
CIP Manager
City of Banning
99 E. Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220
RE: Request for Additional Engineering and Environmental Services for the Sun Lakes Blvd. Extension Project (C00660)
Dear Patrick,
Albert A. Webb Associates (WEBB) respectfully submit this change order for additional Engineering and Environmental Services for the revised alignment of the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project (C00660). It is necessary to revise the alignment of this roadway as it is infeasible to obtain an easement from Kinder Morgan to place the road atop their existing high-pressure gas line.

WEBB has been contracted by the City of Banning to provide engineering and environmental services for the Sun Lakes Blvd. Extension Project. The following are outof-scope additional task items to be provided by WEBB for the proposed revised alignment of Sun Lakes Boulevard:
• Update final design plans and documents
• Revised CEQA Document
• Revised Technical Studies (Biological, Cultural, and Air Quality/GHG/Energy) • Revised Jurisdictional Delineation and Permitting
• Utility coordination
• Project Management, Coordination, and Meetings
At this time, we are respectfully requesting compensation for the tasks already completed and the future tasks to be completed as outlined below. 820
EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES
The proposed Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension project (Project) is a project that entails the construction of a new section of Sun Lakes Boulevard from Highland Home Road to Sunset Avenue. The proposed Project is approximately 5,400 linear feet (1.02 mile) long and 110 feet wide and will be constructed according to the City's General Plan Typical Section for an Arterial Highway.

Westward Avenue is a straight east-west unpaved dirt road between Highland Home Road and Sunset Avenue. Kinder Morgan has two fuel lines (16- and 20-inch diameters) in two 20-feet wide easements along Westward Avenue. The proposed Sun Lakes Boulevard curvilinear alignment overlaps Westward Avenue and Kinder Morgan easements, as shown in Figure 1. Initially, Kinder Morgan had no issue with roadway construction over their easements. Later, Kinder Morgan changed their policies to restrict roadway improvement over their lines and directed the City to realign Sun Lakes Boulevard to minimize the impact on Kinder Morgan fuel lines.

Sun Lakes Boulevard Circulation Plan Alignment
Figure 1
WEBB had already completed draft CEQA documents and associated technical studies and substantially completed final design plans, studies, and documents for the Project. Now, WEBB prepared a preliminary realignment of Sun Lakes Boulevard, as shown in Figure 2. Since the completion of the draft CEQA document and associated technical studies, the alignment for Sun Lakes Boulevard will be modified to an area that falls outside the previously surveyed areas in some places. Therefore, updates to the CEQA document and the relevant technical studies are needed now. In addition, redesigning all final design documents and update of studies and documents are needed.

Sun Lakes Boulevard Realignment to Minimize Impacts on Kinder Morgan Fuel Lines Figure 2
Based on the feedback we received at the pre-application meeting with resource agencies on June 14, 2023, they understood the Kinder Morgan easement challenges. They agreed with the City to allow roadway realignment, as shown in Figure 2 above.

The City has received substantial funds for the Project and would like to move forward as soon as possible to meet the funding deadlines. The following is our understanding of the Project to complete the PS&E:
821

1. Drainage Report and Storm Drain Improvement Plans - Minor updates to the drainage report will be required. Storm drain alignments and elevations will remain the same; minor changes may be needed. Headwall and wing wall changes will be required to match the street improvement plans.

Plans will be submitted for 90%, 100%, and approval.

2. Street Improvement Plans – Try to hold the profile over the storm drains. Revise street improvement plans and profiles for the realignment. Redesign and detail out 7-ADA ramps. No driveways, ADA ramps, and curb ramps will be provided along the alignment. We will provide AC berm at the proposed driveways per City’s request. We will be submitted for 90%, 100%, and approval.

3. Signing & Striping Plans – Revise plans per the realignment and submit for 90% and 100% for approval.

4. Street Light Location Plans – Revise street light location plans per the revised alignment and submit for approval for 90% and 100%. The City will prepare street light conduit and conductor plans.

5. Landscape and Irrigation Plans – Because of budget constraints, the City decided not to landscape the parkway and median at this time, so an update of plans will not be required. The City would like to install sleeves with the Project to avoid future trenching across the pavement. The conduit sleeves will be shown on the street improvement plans.

6. Coordination with the Developer – The City will coordinate with the developer. WEBB will not be required to attend meetings and provide coordination with the developer. WEBB's scope of work includes legal & plats and exhibits needed to obtain right-of-way and easement for the roadway and storm drain improvement. The developer will analyze any impact on future development.

7. Potholing – We will prepare an exhibit for approximately 40 potholes. The City will coordinate and hire a potholing contractor to perform the work. WEBB will conduct the field survey and collect data points set by the potholing contractor.

8. Coordination with Kinder Morgan – Even with the roadway realignment, approximately 500' on both ends will impact Kinder Morgan fuel lines. We have estimated our effort under utility coordination and meetings. It is very hard to predict the effort required to estimate effort to obtain Kinder Morgan approval and to meet the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) requirements. We have added optional items and a budget to provide additional effort if needed.

9. Out-of-scope services – We will obtain authorization from the City for the out-scope services before beginning out-of-scope tasks.
822
Our scope of services is as follows:

Task 1 – Update Final Design Plans, Studies, and Documents

1.1 – Street Improvement Plans
Additional work includes the following items:
a. Update of horizontal alignment to minimize impacts to Kinder Morgan fuel lines. b. Update the vertical centerline, curbs, and right-of-way profiles. c. Update grading limits. The grading limits will consider cut and fill amounts, environmental impact, and resources.
d. Revise raised medians layout and profiles
e. Update sidewalks, ADA ramps, and driveways design and details. f. Review utility adjustment and relocation and update plans and construction notes.

1.2 – Storm Drain System Design
The approved scope and budget for the Project included a task for the development of a preliminary roadway drainage design and tasks for a final drainage report and storm drain plans. The preliminary drainage design task included a preliminary hydrology and hydraulic analysis, preliminary scour calculations, preliminary plans, and a preliminary drainage report. The preliminary design was completed and submitted in November of 2020.

After the preliminary design was completed, concerns were raised by the resource agencies, which necessitated a sediment transport study be prepared for the Project. This study was completed and concluded that revisions to the culvert configuration were needed to address those concerns. WEBB's efforts to coordinate with the sediment transport study engineer and develop a revised design concept were covered under both a separate approved change order and the remaining preliminary design task budget.

A change order was also approved by the City to update the plans based on the revised concept. This change order included updating the drainage report, update of the drainage plan sheets, and preparation of structural details and calculations.

As WEBB was proceeding with the updates to the design, input was received from Kinder Morgan stating that the drainage outlet structures would not be permitted within their easement. WEBB was then directed to stop work while the City coordinated with Kinder Morgan. WEBB was authorized by the City in January 2023 to proceed. An additional redesign of the outlet structures was completed to ensure that they did not encroach into the easement as requested.

After the redesign was substantially complete, WEBB was given direction to realign the street to minimize the impact on the existing Kinder Morgan easement. This change will require a redesign of the channel inlet and outlet structures, a redesign of the street storm drains, and a redesign of the intercept drain on the northerly side of the street. The drainage plans will also need to be redrafted. The hydraulic calculations (HEC-RAS, WSPG, etc) and drainage report will also need to be updated for these changes. The structural design work that has been started will also need to be redone. Added to this work is also an update to the preliminary geotechnical report to provide all the parameters needed to finalize the structural design calculations.
823

1.2.1 - Final Drainage Report Update - Additional work items include:
a. Due to road realignment, update the HEC-RAS model for updated inlet/outlet configuration. b. Update WSPG calculations for culverts, new street storm drains, and intercept drain designs. c. Update report text and exhibits to reflect revised road alignment. d. Address additional plan check comments.

1.2.2 – Storm Drain Plan Update – Additional work items include:
a. Update the design and plan details for the outlet structures to avoid the Kinder Morgan easement. b. Update design and plans due to the road realignment (channel inlet and outlets, street storm drain, northerly intercept ditch, and appurtenances).
c. Coordination with WEBB environmental team for the information requested and/or needed.

1.2.3 - Structural Design Details - Additional work items include:
a. Update structural calculations for revised inlet and outlet configuration. b. Coordination with the geotechnical engineer for information required for structural design. c. Review of Geotechnical report of adjacent development provided by City. d. Update of Preliminary Geotechnical report by sub-consultant.

1.2.4 – Assessment of Potential Sediment Transport Impact - Additional work items include:

A study is to be conducted to assess the potential sediment transport impacts associated with the improvement of Sun Lakes Boulevard. The proposed road improvements involve the addition of several new culvert crossings that are to be constructed upstream of two existing dry weather crossings. The proposed culvert crossings have increased in size since the hydraulic assessment previously conducted by Northwest Hydraulic Consultants (NHC) in 2021. The existing dry weather crossings are to remain in place with the proposed road improvement plan.

Impacts on sediment transport will depend on the configuration proposed for the new crossings. A high-level assessment of the potential effects will be completed through a comparison of hydraulic characteristics pre- and post-project.

We will evaluate (existing conditions models, also developed previously provided for the 2021 NHC study) 2D model hydraulic models (HEC-RAS) of the proposed improvement plan.

Assumptions:
a. The Resource Agencies are currently reviewing the HEC-RAS model prepared for the revised culvert concept. WEBB will proceed with the final design phase ahead of Resource Agency approval under the assumption that they will not have any comments that will impact the culvert design or analysis.

This additional budget request does not include any additional changes to the culvert analysis or design resulting from future Resource Agency comments.
b. It is assumed that the Caltrans Standard Detail D81 for double-cell reinforced concrete boxes can be utilized for the multi-cell boxes required for this Project, and no special structural design is required for these culverts.
c. The final plans and analysis will be designed with the assumption that the future Sunset Crossing project will be designed and built after the roadway project is completed. This additional budget request does not include any additional design or analysis required to assess changes to the roadway design or hydraulic analysis based on this future Project. It also assumes that drainage facilities for the Sunset Crossroads property (outside of the street right of way) will be designed and constructed by the developer's plans and is not a part of the road project scope. 824

1.3 – ROW and Easement Documents
We will prepare and update fourteen (14) documents needed for additional right-of-way and easements.

1.4 – Signing & Striping Plans
Update signing & striping plans for the revised alignment.

1.5 – Street Light Location Plans
a. Update street light location plans for the revised alignment.

1.6 – Specifications
The City will provide us with its boilerplate Technical Provisions in Microsoft Word format. We will compile the project specifications, including the project-specific scope of work in the Technical Specifications, and provide Special Technical Provisions beyond the City's Standard Technical Provisions. With each submittal, WEBB will provide a bid schedule, special provisions, and technical specifications. The specifications shall be signed by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California as complete and ready for bidding purposes and awarding contracts for construction for the improvements. The latest edition of the Greenbook (Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and subsequent amendments) will be used on the Project, except for the signing/striping elements. The City and Caltrans Standard Specifications will be used for these improvements. The City will prepare the bid book.

1.7 - Cost Estimates
We will provide a construction quantity and cost estimate with each submittal of plans. The unit costs shall be based upon the most current cost information for recent similar projects in the area compiled by us and approved by the City. The estimated items of work with quantities shall include, but not be limited to, itemizing all removals, clearing and grubbing, relocations, sidewalk, curb & gutter, driveway approaches, Asphalt Concrete (AC), utility improvements, applying/painting of pavement legends & striping, signs, traffic control, raised pavement markers, street lights in City limits, storm drain improvements, and project identification and completion signs. The estimates will also include probable costs for utility relocations, right-of-way, and temporary construction easements.

Task 3 – Revised Environmental Documentation
Since the completion of the draft CEQA document and associated technical studies, the alignment for Sun Lakes Boulevard has been modified to an area that, in some places, falls outside the previously surveyed areas. Therefore, updates to the CEQA document and the relevant technical studies are needed at this time.

3.1 - Revised Cultural Resources Study – Additional work items include:
a. Applied Earthworks (AE), WEBB's cultural resources subconsultant will conduct a complete and intensive cultural resource survey of the additional Project acreage. Two previously documented cultural resources (a large farm/ranch complex and a large historic water-control complex) are located within the expanded Project area. AE will confirm the location of these previously identified resources in proximity to the expanded Project area and assess their current condition. 825
b. AE will update the Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment (Phase I CRA) and paleontological memorandum to include the additional Project acreage, as well as add language regarding federal funding. This scope includes two rounds of comments following the City review of the draft updated Phase I CRA and no major revisions will be required. The draft updated Phase I CRA and paleontological memorandum will be submitted electronically in MS Word format for ease of review; the final updated Phase I CRA and paleontological memorandum will be submitted electronically as a PDF file.

3.2 - Revised Biological Resources Studies – Additional work items include:
a. WSP USA Environment & Infrastructure Solutions (WSA),1 WEBB's biological resources subconsultant will revise the figures and exhibits, recalculate impacts, and update the previously finalized versions of the following reports to include the revised street alignment (Project footprint). The updated draft reports listed below will be submitted electronically for ease of review; the final revised reports will be submitted electronically as PDF files.

1. Habitat Assessment/Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Consistency Analysis,

2. Focused Burrowing Owl Survey,

3. Narrow Endemic and Criterial Area Plants Survey,

4. Los Angeles Pocket Mouse Protocol Survey

5. Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP)

6. West and Dry Season Fairy Shrimp Survey Memo Update

3.3 - Additional Environmental Coordination – Additional work items include:

WEBB has expended all original budgets associated with coordination and meetings with the Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) and regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Regional Water Quality Control Board and US Fish and Wildlife Service). Given that a meeting has been scheduled for June 14, 2023 with the RCA and regulatory agencies, and since there will be pre- and post- meeting coordination needed with the City and WEBB Team, additional request for budgets to do this meeting, along with more frequent coordination with the City as the revised CEQA document is underway, will also be needed.

3.4 – Revised Environmental (CEQA) Documentation – Additional work items include:

The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) in addition to the CEQA notices for the original proposed alignment have been prepared. The IS/MND was ready to be released in January 2024 for public review prior to the decision to revise the Project alignment. Because the Project footprint has changed and revised biological resources reports, cultural report, and jurisdictional delineation must be prepared, additional budget is needed to revise and complete processing the IS/MND for public review through the Final MND phase. We are asking for an additional task authorization to complete this task since the budget originally allocated has been expended.

This scope does not include updating the air quality/greenhouse gas analysis completed in November 2021, which was prepared using the California Emissions Estimator Model® version 2020.4.0 (CalEEMod) model.

The California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) released CalEEMod version 2022.1 in December 2022. However, WEBB is not proposing to redo the air quality/greenhouse gas analysis using 1 Wood Environment Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. was acquired by WSP. 826
the new model because: (i) the analysis was completed before the new model was released; (ii) there are no substantial changes to the Project that would warrant remodeling construction impacts; (iii) this is a capital improvement project; and (iv) and the results of the original air quality/greenhouse gas analysis were well below the numeric thresholds that would indicate a potentially significant impact. In the event comments are received during the public review period for the IS/MND, WEBB would address that in the responses to comments and explain the rationale for not remodeling the Project's air quality/greenhouse gas emissions.

Task 4 - Jurisdictional Delineation and Permitting
The original field surveys for the jurisdictional delineation (JD) were completed summer 2021, exhibits prepared, impacts calculated, and these results were presented to the resource agencies. WEBB will update the previous JD, to cover the new areas proposed by the revised Project alignment, including a 100-foot survey buffer. Specifically, WEBB will update the existing JD report with regulatory changes that have occurred since preparation of the original 2021 JD report. Following the literature review update, WEBB will conduct a one-day site visit to the revised Project site to document suspected wetlands and non-wetland waters of the U.S, waters of the State located outside federal jurisdiction, and streambed according to Fish and Game Code.

Waters of the U.S. will be evaluated using the methodology set forth in the guidelines provided in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987), the 2008 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Arid West Region (Version 2.0), and the 2008 Field Guide to the Identification of the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) in the Arid West Region of the Western United States. Potential Waters of the State that are outside of federal jurisdiction will be identified following the Procedures for Discharges of Dredged or Fill Material to Waters of the State. Fish and Game Code, Section 1600 et al streambed will be identified as the bank-to-bank where the active streambed shows the fullest expression on the landscape.

After the site-visit is completed, WEBB will update the JD report with the new data collected from the site visit including tables, figures, and impacts discussion. The report will be prepared following the 2017 U.S Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Minimum Standards for Acceptance of Aquatic Resources Delineation Reports. The JD report will provide an analysis and discussion of the existing site conditions, methods, and results of the delineation, including details such as soil types, hydrology, and vegetation present on the site.

The report will also provide a discussion of the impacts proposed to any jurisdictional areas, including photographs and exhibits depicting any jurisdictional features.

Task 5 – Utility Coordination and Additional Field Survey for Potholing (Time and Material Basis) WEBB will Identify all known utilities that potentially conflict with the planned project improvements and determine special requirements for facilities, including protection, relocation, right-of-way easements, and construction. WEBB will coordinate with utility companies to schedule the relocation of the utilities before the start of construction.
a. Coordinate with Kinder Morgan to construct Sun Lakes Boulevard for segments east of Highland Home Road and west of Sunset Avenue.
b. Coordinate with City to relocate power poles and guy anchors and adjust electrical vaults. c. Coordinate with the City for relocation and adjustment of water valves, fire hydrants, blow-offs, air vacuum, and sewer manholes.
d. Coordinate with the Gas Company to relocate and adjust gas valves and electronic gas station. 827
e. Coordinate with telecommunication companies for the adjustment of telecommunication manholes.
f. Attend six (6) meetings with utility companies.
g. We will prepare an exhibit for approximately 40 potholes. The City will coordinate and hire a potholing contractor to perform the work. WEBB will conduct the field survey and collect data points set by the potholing contractor.

Task 6 – Project Management, Coordination, and Meetings (Time and Material Basis) We will schedule and attend meetings as follows:
a. Project Development Team (PDT) meetings – We estimate twelve (12) meetings b. Environmental meetings - We estimate six (6) meetings We will schedule, chair, and prepare meeting agendas and meeting minutes. The agendas will be submitted to the City for review one working day before the meeting. The minutes will be distributed to all attendees, everyone invited, and the City's Project Manager within five working days after the meeting.

The minutes shall include but are not limited to a list of attendees with phone numbers and contact emails, a summary of discussion items, a decision log, ROW/Utility Tracking Sheets, any pertinent information, and follow-up to action items.

We will update project schedules. The project schedules will be divided into tasks and subtasks in full detail, including the City function timeline, critical path, and outside sources such as agencies or utilities.

Task 7 – Engineering Support Services for Environmental Documentation, Jurisdictional Delineation, and Permitting (Time and Material Basis)
We have been providing out-of-scope services for the realignment of the roadway and coordination with the City and resource agencies.

We will provide engineering support services for environmental documentation, jurisdictional delineation, and permitting.

Optional Task 8 – Additional Work for Kinder Morgan (Time and Material Basis) Even with the roadway realignment, approximately 500' on both ends will impact Kinder Morgan fuel lines.

We have estimated our effort under utility coordination and meetings. It is very hard to predict the effort required to estimate effort to obtain Kinder Morgan approval and to meet the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) requirements. Any additional effort required beyond estimated under the utility coordination and meetings, with the approval of the City, WEBB will provide additional support services. 828
EXHIBIT "B" COMPENSATION FOR SCOPE OF SERVICES
Total fees for services shown in the Scope of Services (Exhibit "A") shall not exceed $496,079 without prior authorization from the client. If the optional Task 7 is to be conducted, the total shall be provided on a time and materials basis not to exceed $516,079 after City authorization for the task. We propose to provide details in Exhibit "A" for an initial Time & Materials fee to be billed monthly in accordance with the attached fee schedule.

Task budgets are estimates and may be used interchangeably to stay within the budget total. Any additional services requested outside this scope will be provided under separate contract addenda for additional fees.

Charges for deliveries, printing, copying, mileage, postage, outside services, and for coordination or other services not specifically listed in the scope of work (Reimbursable Expenses) will be billed on a time and material basis in accordance with our Schedule of Fees. Checking and/or filing fees are not included in this contract and shall be paid directly to the appropriate governmental agency by the client.

If you find this request acceptable, please issue contract amendment #1 with the current dollar amount to the Final Engineering Services contract dated June 23, 2020. We appreciate this opportunity to serve your firm and look forward to hearing from you. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, don't hesitate to contact me at 951-830-4305.

Sincerely,

ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
Dilesh Sheth, PE / TE
Senior Vice President
829
Exhibit B
Item Description
Stephanie Standerfer Cheryl DeGano Autumn DeWoody Marshall Paymard Field Biologist Virginia Waters Jacqueline Gamboa Joseph Caldwell Eric Hays Ranjit Singh Nathan Armendariz Dilesh Sheth Nicholas Keller Joy Schwiebert Son Le Deborah Saulina Danielle Logsdon Jason Ardery Michael Johnson Linda Bouschet Jon Ros Andres Lopez Party Chief/2-Person Survey Crew Total HoursSubtotal - LaborSub-consultant budget
Total/task
Classification
Principal IIPrincipal IIAssociate IIAssociate IIAssistant IIAssistant IIAssistant IIPrincipal IIPrincipal ISenior IIIAssistant VPrincipal IISenior IAssistant VAssociate IIAssistant IIISenior IIIPrincipal IIPrincipal IIAssociate IIISenior IISenior IParty Chief/2-Person Billout Rate $ 293 293 $ 197 $ 197 $ 135 $ 135 $ 135 $ 293 $ 279 $ 252 $ 173 $ 293 $ 232 $ 173 $ 197 $ 144 $ 252 $ 293 $ 293 $ 208 $ 240 $ 232 $ 302 $ Task 1 - Update Final Design Plans, Studies, and Documents 24 62 168 430 30 208 108 48 60 110 8 16 110 14 1396 $ 295,874 $ 6,600 $ 302,474

1.1 Street i\Improvement Plans $ - $ - $ -
Update Street i\Improvement Plans 12 200 12 40 264 $ 61,724 $ - $ 61,724 Redesign ADA Ramps (7) 2 70 12 84 $ 15,720 $ - $ 15,720

1.2 Storm Drain System Design

1.2.1 - Final Drainage Report Update 8 20 50 2 8 4 4 96 $ 19,588 $ - $ 19,588

1.2.2 - Storm Drain Plan Update 8 40 120 300 2 4 4 478 $ 97,814 $ - $ 97,814

1.2.3 - Structural Design Details 2 4 80 2 4 4 96 $ 17,576 $ - $ 17,576

1.2.4 - Assessment of Potential Sediment Transport Impact 8 4 8 2 4 4 30 $ 7,646 $ 6,600 $ 14,246

1.3 ROW and Easement Documents (14) 8 8 8 8 16 110 14 172 $ 38,296 $ - $ 38,296

1.4 Signing and Striping Plans 6 40 4 50 $ 9,494 $ - $ 9,494

1.5 Street Light Plans 16 4 20 $ 3,344 $ 3,344

1.6 Specifications 8 8 4 8 20 48 $ 11,612 $ - $ 11,612

1.7 Cost Estimate 8 8 4 8 8 8 14 58 $ 13,060 $ - $ 13,060 Task 3 - CEQA Compliance Services Revised Environmental Documentation 56 108 8 68 240 $ 58,808 $ 17,820 $ 76,628

3.1 Revised Cultural Resources Study 4 4 8 $ 1,712 $ 3,520 $ 5,232

3.2 Revised Biological Resources Studies 4 4 8 $ 1,712 $ 14,300 $ 16,012

3.3 Additional Environmental Coordination 40 60 100 $ 29,300 $ - $ 29,300

3.4 Revised CEQA Documentation 16 40 8 60 124 $ 26,084 $ - $ 26,084 Task 4 - Jurisdictional Delineation and Permitting 28 20 89 74 12 16 239 $ 49,955 $ - $ 49,955

4.1 Revised Survey, Mapping, Impact Calculation, Report Preparation, and Regulatory Permitting (includes optional UAV Remote sensing updates) 28 20 89 74 12 16 239 $ - 49,955 $ 49,955 $ Task 5 - Utility Coordination and Additional Field Survey for Potholing (T&M) 6 6 6 16 10 2 4 8 58 12,942 $ - $ 12,942 $

5.1 Utility Coordination & Meetings (6) 6 6 12 6 30 $ 6,036 $ - $ 6,036

5.2 Additional Survey for Potholing 6 4 4 2 4 8 28 $ 6,906 $ 6,906 Task 6 - Project Management, Coordination & Meeting (T&M) 26 12 30 42 110 $ 24,598 $ - $ 24,598

6.1 Project Management and Coordination 8 12 20 $ 5,368 $ - $ 5,368

6.2 PDT Meetings (Estimate 12) 12 12 24 24 72 $ 15,096 $ - $ 15,096

6.3 Environmental Meetings (estimate 6) 6 6 6 18 $ 4,134 $ - $ 4,134 8 8 24 16 16 14 28 8 122
$ - 29,482 $ 29,482 $

7.1 Realignment and Pre-Coordination with Agencies 8 8 8 8 6 12 50 $ 12,882 $ - $ 12,882

7.2 Engineering Support Services for Environmental Documentation, Jurisdictional Delineation, and Permitting 16 8 16 8 16 8 72
$ - 16,600 $ 16,600 $
92 136 97 74 12 16 68 48 62 184 446 76 214 154 48 106 170 8 18 110 14 4 8 2165 $ 471,659 $ 24,420 $ 496,079 Optional Task 8 - Additional Work for Kinder Morgan (T&M) $ - $ 20,000 $ 20,000

8.1 Additional Work for Kinder Morgan $ - $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Total
Additional Engineering and Environmental Services for the Sun Lakes Blvd. Extension Project (C00660) Task 7 - Engineering Support Services for Environmental Documentation, Jurisdictional Delineation, and Permitting (T&M)
G:\Proposals\FORMAL PROPOSALS\City of Banning\015921 Sun Lakes Change Order\Sun Lakes CO 3 Budget_2023-07-06 7/6/202310:44 AM 830 2020-0126
3788 McCray Street, Riverside, CA 92506 | P:951.686.1070 | F:951.788.1256 | www.webbassociates.com February 28, 2025
Revised April 23, 2025
Patrick Safari, CIP Manager
City of Banning
99 E. Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220
Sent via email: [email protected]
RE: Proposal for Contract Amendment No. 4 - Additional Environmental Services for Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project (PSA C00660)
Dear Patrick,
Pursuant to your request on February 6, 2025, and subsequent discussion on April 2, 2025, Albert A.

WEBB Associates (WEBB) is pleased to provide you with this proposal for additional services for the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project. WEBB is currently under contract with the City to obtain regulatory permits for the project from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB).

Said permits have requirements that the City will need to fulfill prior to construction of the project which are outlined below in Task 1. Biological reporting and monitoring that is required during construction are not included herein, but as we have discussed with you, we understand the City will include the permitting-related tasks during construction to be included in the City’s forthcoming construction management contract.

Also included in this request is the City’s obligation for compensatory mitigation related to impacts to jurisdictional waters which are required to be fulfilled within 18 months of impacts. Task 2 includes WEBB’s assistance with the compensatory mitigation obligations. 831
WO: 2020-0126
City of Banning
Scope of Work
Task 1: Biological Services During Construction
The Tasks below are related to the surveying and reporting requirements of the CDFW permit, RWQCB permit, as well as CEQA mitigation measures MM BIO-1 through MM BIO-4.1 WEBB will subcontract with Osprey Environmental Associates (Osprey) to fulfill these requirements.

Preconstruction Nesting Bird Survey and Report (corresponds to CDFW Measures 2.11.1 and 4.4; CEQA MM BIO-1)
Osprey will conduct preconstruction nesting bird surveys if vegetation clearance occurs outside the recommended window (September 1 – February 1). Surveys will be performed within three (3) days prior to construction initiation to identify active nests within 100 feet of the project site. A survey report by a qualified biologist verifying nest status will be submitted to the City of Banning prior to construction. If active nests are identified, species-specific measures will be implemented to prevent nest abandonment.

Burrowing Owl Pre-Construction Inspection Survey and Report (corresponds to CDFW Measure 2.12.4 and CEQA MM BIO-2)
A single preconstruction burrowing owl survey will be conducted within 3 days of vegetation removal or ground disturbance. The survey will comply with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) and 2006 "Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions” and will cover entire the project site and within 150-meters. If burrowing owls are detected during the breeding season (February 1–August 31), a 300-foot buffer will be enforced around active burrows until nesting is complete. Following the survey, a burrowing owl pre-construction survey report will be prepared and submitted to WEBB in PDF format. The survey report will document the methods, results, and conclusion of the survey.

Crotch’s Bumble Bee (corresponds to CEQA MM BIO-3)
• Crotch’s Bumble Bee Habitat Mapping and Report (corresponds to CDFW Measure 2.14) Osprey will conduct habitat mapping for the Crotch’s bumblebee within the project footprint.

Mapping will identify habitat alliances following Sawyer et al. (2009). Following field mapping and no less than 120 days prior to the initiation of activities Osprey will complete and submit to CDFW a baseline habitat mapping report. The report will identify species composition for each mapped alliance and will be submitted to CDFW.
• Crotch’s Bumble Bee Draft Survey Plan (corresponds to CDFW Measure 2.15.2) A qualified Osprey biologist will prepare and submit to CDFW for review and comment a draft survey plan for Crotch’s bumble bee. The survey plan will identify the timing, number, and duration of survey efforts, and procedures to follow should Crotch’s bumble bee be detected within the project area. 1 There are a total of five mitigation measures for biological resources. MM BIO-5 is “Mitigation for Riparian/Riverine and Jurisdictional Impacts.” WEBB’s assistance with this is in Task 2, herein. 832
WO: 2020-0126
City of Banning
The survey plan will be submitted no less than 90 days prior to initiation of project activities in suitable habitat.
• Crotch’s Bumble Bee Survey(s) and Report (corresponds to CDFW Measure 2.15.3) If habitat mapping identifies the presence of plants (e.g., genera Antirrhinum, Phacelia, Clarkia, Cordylanthus, Dendromecon, Eschscholzia, Eriogonum, Hypericum, Lantana, Lupinus, Salvia, Asclepias, Cirsium, Monardella, Keckiella, Acmispon, Euthamia, Ehrendorferia, Vicia, and/or Trichostema) or other suitable habitat (i.e. nesting, foraging, and overwintering habitat), Osprey will conduct focused surveys for the Crotch’s bumblebee (CBB) following the approval and submittal of survey plan. Osprey will first conduct a literature review and records search for CBB occurrences within a 10-mile radius, utilizing the CDFW California Natural Diversity Database and iNaturalist.

Following the literature review, Osprey will conduct on-site CBB surveys following the Survey Considerations for California Endangered Species Act Candidate Bumble Bee Species (CDFW 2023). These surveys will take place during the Colony Active Period (April-August) and when floral resources are available, ideally at peak bloom. A minimum of three surveys will be conducted, spaced 2-4 weeks apart between April and August. Surveys will be performed during daylight, beginning at least one hour after sunrise and ending at least two hours before sunset, ideally between 9:00 AM and 1:00 PM, with temperatures between 65°F and 90°F and wind speeds under 8 miles per hour. Each survey will cover at least one person-hour of search effort per three acres of suitable habitat.

Following the completion of the surveys, a report will be prepared summarizing the survey methods, findings, and conclusions. The report will also include a list of bee species observed and any accompanying photographs. Survey results will be submitted to CDFW before ground-disturbing activities begin. If an active CBB nest is detected, a no-disturbance buffer zone will be established, and CDFW will be notified.

Biological Worker’s Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) and Invasive Species Education Program (corresponds to CDFW Measures 2.8 and 2.8.1; CEQA MM BIO-4) Osprey will develop and conduct a mandatory Biological Worker’s Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) training for all construction personnel. This training will cover key topics, including CBB, burrowing owls, rare plant species, and riparian/riverine features. WEAP training will be coordinated with the paleontological WEAP. A recorded training will be prepared and available.

Further, included in the WEAP will be an additional discussion of the invasive species currently present within the project site as well as those that may pose a threat to or have the potential to invade the Project site. The discussion will include a physical description of each species and information regarding their habitat preferences, local and statewide distribution, modes of dispersal, and impacts. The invasive species education program will also include a discussion of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be implemented at the Project site to avoid the introduction and spread of invasive species into and out of the Project site. 833
WO: 2020-0126
City of Banning
WEBB Management of Biological Services
WEBB has budgeted 40 hours to manage and coordinate with Osprey related to Task 1 including reviewing documents, and meeting with the City.

UAV (Drone) Survey(s) (Optional)
Osprey can provide a drone survey of the project area to generate a high-resolution orthomosaic basemap, offering a temporally and spatially accurate depiction of the project site as is currently prior to construction and post-construction. This updated imagery can serve as a key reference for stakeholders, ensuring precise visualization of project lands, roads, and planned or constructed infrastructure. The orthomosaic will enhance project planning, coordination, and decision-making by delivering highly accurate spatial and visual data. The flight will be conducted by an Osprey FAA-licensed Remote Pilot in Command (RPIC) and a visual observer, ensuring full compliance with FAA regulations. The drone data collection and subsequent GIS analysis will be used to support all of Osprey’s reporting deliverables included herein. Deliverables will include a high-resolution orthomosaic base map, digital terrain model depicting project ground elevations, and a digital surface model depicting project surface elevations.

Although a temporally and spatially accurate orthomosaic basemap is informative and helpful, this optional service is not required in order to complete any of the aforementioned tasks.

Task 1 Assumptions
• None of the species identified above will be found on site. • This scope includes one (1) in-person WEAP training. Any additional training sessions will require a separate scope and fee.
• Materials required for delineating Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) or establishing nesting buffers are not included in this proposal. The cost of these materials will be billed directly to the client if not provided by the City.
• The preparation of a Burrowing Owl Mitigation Plan is not included. If required, Osprey will provide a separate scope and fee for this task.
• This proposal does not cover small mammal trapping or the preparation of a small mammal trapping survey report. If required, Osprey will provide an additional scope and fee for these efforts.
• Assistance with securing an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) from CDFW is not included. If required, Osprey can provide a separate scope and fee for this task.

Task 2: WEBB Assistance with Offsite Compensatory Mitigation Fulfillment (corresponds to CDFW Measure 3.3; CEQA MM BIO-5)
WEBB has included 50 hours to help the City to set up its compensatory mitigation obligation utilizing an offsite mitigation site owned by the City located southeast of the City’s wastewater treatment plant. We anticipate actions under this task will be to advise and support the City related to: finding a third party to hold a conservation easement/deed restriction(s) on the City’s property (City to retain 834
WO: 2020-0126
City of Banning
fee title), negotiate and find the City a third party land manager and assist City with said agreement, and finding an entity to provide a non-wasting endowment. We understand the City will take lead on each of these tasks; therefore this budget is for things like attending meetings to provide project background and making connections to facilitate the process.

Budget
Our proposed budget for the services listed herein will be billed on a Time and Materials basis according to our existing contract for a total not to exceed of $57,080.

Environmental Services
Task 1 - Biological Services
Preconstruction Nesting Bird Survey and Report $ 4,660
Burrowing Owl Pre-Construction Inspection Survey and Report $ 6,230 Crotch’s Bumble Bee Habitat Mapping and Report $ 6,840
Crotch’s Bumble Bee Draft Survey Plan $ 4,350
Crotch’s Bumble Bee Survey(s) and Report $ 14,380
WEBB Management of Task 1 (40 hours) $ 7,150
Optional UAV (Drone) Survey $ 4,370
Task 2 - Management and Coordination for Offsite Mitigation $ 9,100 TOTAL $ 57,080
The following is a summary of original, current, and proposed authorizations according to our records.

WEBB Original Authorization: $548,416.05 plus $54,841.61 contingency for total of $603,725.66
Change Order No. 1 $24,983.25 (subtracted from contingency) Change Order No. 2 $5,974.88 (subtracted from contingency) City Council Resolution 2022-106 $129,400 (rescinded)
City Council Resolution 2022-139 $148,222
Change Order No. 3 $496,079
Current Authorization $1,248,026.66
Proposed Change Order $57,080
Total WEBB Authorization with Proposed
Change Order $1,305,106.66
835
WO: 2020-0126
City of Banning
If you find this request acceptable, please issue a contract amendment to our office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to the City and look forward to hearing from you. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please call me at (951) 830-4305.

Sincerely,
ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
Dilesh Sheth, PE, TE
Senior Vice President
[email protected]
Copy: Stephanie Standerfer
Autumn DeWoody
836
WO: 2020-0126
City of Banning
Page | 6
837
3788 McCray Street, Riverside, CA 92506 | P:951.686.1070 | F:951.788.1256 | www.webbassociates.com August 8, 2025
Patrick Safari, CIP Manager
City of Banning
99 E. Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220
Sent via email: [email protected]
RE: Proposal for Contract Amendment No. 6 - Additional Environmental and Engineering Services for Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project (PSA C00660) Dear Patrick,
Pursuant to our discussion on July 3, 2025 and August 5, 2025, Albert A. WEBB Associates (WEBB) is pleased to provide you with this proposal for additional services for the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project. The previous contract amendment authorized WEBB to conduct surveys for the Crotch’s bumble bee (Bombus crotchii, CBB) within the Project limits. CBB is a candidate for listing under the California Endangered Species Act and therefore treated as a listed species by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). The surveys were needed to comply with the Project’s CEQA mitigation measures and the forthcoming Streambed Alteration Agreement from CDFW. WEBB partnered with Osprey Environmental Associates who maintains the required credentials to survey for CBB.

The bee was found within the Project limits on June 27, 2025. Therefore, this contract amendment reflects the anticipation that the City will need an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) for CBB from CDFW and that the offsite mitigation proposed for mitigating the Project’s jurisdictional impacts may also be required to include mitigation for CBB.

In addition, the City has been coordinating with Kinder Morgan on the relocation of their fuel lines within the Sun Lake Boulevard project limits. Last week, Kinder Morgan requested that the slope be moved 50 feet to the north along the eastern project boundary. This proposed change will require revisions to the street improvement plans, including the relocation of the storm drain outlet. In addition, preparation of the slope & drainage and the temporary construction easement documents. The City is requesting a contract amendment to revise the street & storm drain improvement plans and easement document to accommodate Kinder Morgan’s request.

Finally, the City is preparing for pre-construction and construction surveys and has requested WEBB to provide archaeological and paleontological support for CEQA mitigation measures MM CR-1 (Monitoring and Inadvertent Discovery), MM GEO-1 (Paleontological Worker Environmental Awareness Program), and MM GEO-2 (Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program).

Scope of Work
Task 1: Incidental Take Permit (ITP) Application
Osprey will prepare a complete ITP application that addresses potential impacts to CBB. The ITP application will include the following components:

1. Project Description
A detailed description of the proposed project, including scope, purpose, construction activities, and schedule, emphasizing elements relevant to biological resources and potential impacts to CBB. 838
2020-0126
City of Banning
2 2. Project Location
A clear and accurate description of the project location, including jurisdiction, parcel boundaries, and regional context. GIS-based mapping will support this section, showing the spatial relationship of project elements to known CBB habitat.

3. Take Analysis
Assess the likelihood, nature, and extent of incidental take resulting from proposed project activities. This will include direct (e.g., crushing during grading) and indirect (e.g., habitat degradation) take mechanisms and their anticipated frequency and scale.

4. Impact Analysis
Evaluate the biological significance of the anticipated take, with an emphasis on how project-related impacts may affect local CBB populations. This will include discussion of habitat quality, floral resource availability, and the role of the site in the species’ life cycle.

5. Jeopardy Analysis
Assess whether issuance of the ITP would jeopardize the continued existence of CBB. This analysis will include:
• A review of known population trends and range contractions • Evaluation of existing threats to CBB (e.g., pesticides, habitat loss) • Consideration of cumulative impacts from related or nearby projects (*if data is available) • An assessment of how project mitigation and minimization measures offset potential risk to the species’ long-term survival and reproductive success

6. Minimization and Mitigation Measures
Propose feasible and enforceable measures to avoid, minimize, and fully mitigate impacts. These may include:
• Seasonal work windows
• Designated biologist oversight
• Daily biological sweeps
• No-disturbance buffers around observed individuals or nests • Restoration or enhancement of temporarily disturbed habitat • Permanent preservation of habitat at a 1:1 or greater ratio

7. Monitoring and Reporting Plan
Develop a monitoring plan to document implementation and effectiveness of all minimization and mitigation measures. This may include photo documentation, habitat success criteria, and adaptive management triggers.

8. Funding and Implementation
Describe the funding sources and financial assurances that are available to fully implement the ITP requirements, including habitat restoration, long-term management, and any required endowment contributions.

Osprey will be available to coordinate directly with CDFW staff throughout the application process to facilitate review and respond to any requests for additional information. We will prepare and submit the 839
2020-0126
City of Banning
3 ITP package in a format consistent with CDFW’s current guidelines and expectations. This scope assumes up to two meetings will be required to discuss the findings and ITP application.

Task 2: CBB Habitat Assessment of Offsite Mitigation Site (APNs 532-180-049 and -017)
The City owns two parcels that have been identified in the Project’s regulatory permit applications to serve as offsite mitigation for jurisdictional impacts. The riparian/riverine portions of these parcels have already been surveyed by Osprey for suitability as mitigation for jurisdictional impacts; however, the survey did not assess whether it also contained suitable habitat for mitigation for CBB. Therefore, Osprey will conduct a biological assessment of the parcels to evaluate their suitability to support CBB habitat. This task will include both a comprehensive desktop review and a reconnaissance-level field assessment.

The desktop review will include a thorough analysis of relevant environmental databases and datasets, including but not limited to the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and applicable citizen science databases such as iNaturalist and the Xerces Society’s California Bumble Bee Atlas. This review will assess the historical and recent documentation of CBB in the vicinity of the proposed mitigation parcels.

Following the literature review, Osprey biologists will conduct a field-based reconnaissance survey by foot to assess site conditions and determine habitat suitability for CBB. The survey will evaluate the presence and quality of key habitat features such as floral diversity and abundance, availability of nesting substrates (e.g., rodent burrows, thatch layers), and potential overwintering habitat. All blooming species observed will be recorded and mapped using GPS and/or GIS, and vegetation communities will be broadly classified to inform mitigation potential.

Upon completion of these efforts, Osprey will prepare a summary letter report detailing the findings of both the desktop and field assessments. The report will include a habitat suitability evaluation, mapped habitat features, and a discussion of the site’s potential to serve as suitable mitigation for CBB under the California Endangered Species Act. This information will serve as baseline data to inform future coordination with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and support Incidental Take Permit planning and review processes.

Task 3: Task 3. UAV (Drone) Survey(s) (Optional)
As an optional task, Osprey can perform a drone-based aerial survey of the two mitigation parcels identified in Task 2 to generate a high-resolution orthomosaic basemap. This product will provide a current, spatially accurate representation of site conditions, aiding in the visualization of habitat features and supporting documentation for mitigation planning.

The UAV survey will be conducted by an Osprey FAA-licensed Remote Pilot in Command (RPIC), accompanied by a qualified visual observer, in full compliance with FAA Part 107 regulations. Collected imagery will be processed into georeferenced orthomosaics suitable for GIS integration. The resulting basemap will enhance coordination with regulatory agencies, support comparative analyses over time, and provide a detailed visual record for future project documentation. 840
2020-0126
City of Banning
4 Drone survey data can be integrated into all deliverables prepared under Task 1 and Task 2 and will serve as a valuable resource for informing future monitoring, restoration planning, or adaptive management efforts on the mitigation parcels.

Task 4: WEBB Meetings and Coordination
WEBB has included 28 hours for meetings and coordination associated with Tasks 1-3 and Task 6. This includes reviewing documents, attending meetings, and coordinating with the City, and Morongo Band of Missions Indians for the tribal monitoring services agreement.

Task 5: Revise Street & Storm Drain Improvement Plans and Prepare Easement Documents
As part of the contract amendment, we will revise the street and storm drain improvement plans for the Sun Lake Boulevard project to incorporate design changes requested by Kinder Morgan. They have asked for the top of the slope to be moved 50 feet to the north along the eastern project boundary to accommodate the relocation of their existing fuel lines. In response, we will coordinate with the City to confirm the revised alignment and any right-of-way impacts. We will update the street improvement plans to reflect the new slope location and associated grading modifications. Additionally, we will revise the storm drain system design, including the relocation of the existing storm drain outlet and any affected infrastructure. We will prepare the slope & drainage and temporary construction easement (TCE) legal and plats. Our scope includes updating the relevant plan sheets, profiles, and details; providing revised quantities and construction cost estimates; and submitting the updated plans and easement documents for City review. We will also incorporate one round of review comments as part of this task.

Task 6: Archaeological and Paleontological Mitigation Measures WEBB will partner with CRM Tech to provide the City with the qualified archaeologists and paleontologists in order to fulfill CEQA mitigation measures MM CR-1 (Monitoring and Inadvertent Discovery), MM GEO1 (Paleontological Worker Environmental Awareness Program), and MM GEO-2 (Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program).

Scope of Work: Preparation of the Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program Document CEQA mitigation measure MM GEO-2 states that prior to the commencement of ground-disturbing activities, the Project Paleontologist (retained under MM GEO-1) shall prepare and implement a Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) for the Project. The PRIMP will describe the monitoring required during excavations that extend into locations of areas deemed to have a high paleontological resource potential, which include older Holocene-age and Pleistocene-age alluvial deposits. To meet the requirement to develop this document for this project, CRM TECH will review pertinent geological and paleontological documents available for the project area and vicinity and review the geotechnical study completed for the project as well as the site plan and grading plans. This information will be synthesized into a site-specific Program document that will outline the procedures for paleontological monitoring and for the proper treatment of all paleontological resources that may be encountered while monitoring the earth-disturbing activities associated with the project, as per the conditions for this project.
841
2020-0126
City of Banning
5 Scope of Work: Preparing and Presenting the Paleontological Worker’s Environmental Awareness Program
CEQA mitigation measure MM GEO-1 states that in order to educate the construction contractor and each of the construction crews about the types of paleontological resources that may be encountered along the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project, prior to the start of the construction, the City of Banning shall retain a professional paleontologist (the “Project Paleontologist”) to prepare a Paleontological Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP). The Paleontological WEAP shall be taped and presented to any construction crew members not present at the preconstruction meeting during which it was initially presented prior to such crew members working on the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project. To prepare for and present the training program, CRM TECH will review the available paleontological information for the study area and vicinity; collect information about the types fossils that might be present in the project area; gather examples of fossils (or photographs of fossils), maps, contact information, and other data for use during the training session; review and compile information regarding the monitoring activities including safety measures and the procedures to be followed during ground disturbance in sensitive areas and protocols that apply in the event that resources are discovered. This information will be assembled so that it can be presented in an easily understood, comprehensive Worker Environmental Awareness Program regarding paleontological resources.

Budget
Our proposed budget for the services listed herein will be billed on a not-to-exceed time and materials (T&M) basis according to our existing contract for a total not to exceed of $59,600.

Environmental & Engineering Services Fee
Task 1. (Osprey) Preparation of CDFW ITP Application for the Crotch’s Bumble Bee $ 15,530 Task 2.
(Osprey) Biological Assessment for Potential Crotch’s Bumblebee Mitigation Site(s) APNs: 532-180-049 & 532-180-017 $ 5,750
Task 3. (Osprey) UAV (Drone) Survey (Optional) $ 1,960
Task 4.
(WEBB) meetings and coordination, and tribal monitoring services agreement with Morongo Band of Mission Indians $ 5,690
Task 5.
(WEBB) Revise Street & Storm Drain Improvement Plans and Prepare Easement Documents $ 25,540
Task 6. (CRM Tech) Prepare PRIMP; Prepare and Present Paleontological WEAP $ 5,130 TOTAL $ 59,600
842
2020-0126
City of Banning
6 The following is a summary of original, current, and proposed authorizations according to our records.

WEBB Original Authorization: $548,416.05 plus $54,841.61 contingency for total of $603,725.66
Change Order No. 1 $24,983.25 (subtracted from contingency) Change Order No. 2 $5,974.88 (subtracted from contingency) City Council Resolution 2022-106 $129,400 (rescinded)
City Council Resolution 2022-139 $148,222
Change Order No. 4 $496,079
Change Order No. 5 $57,080
Current Authorization $1,305,106.66
Proposed Change Order $59,600
Proposed Authorization $1,364,706.66
If you find this request acceptable, please issue a contract amendment to our office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to the City and look forward to hearing from you. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please call me at (951) 830-4305.

Sincerely,
ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
Dilesh Sheth, PE, TE
Senior Vice President
[email protected]
Copy: Stephanie Standerfer
Autumn DeWoody
843
January 15, 2026
Patrick Safari, CIP Manager
City of Banning
99 E. Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220
Sent via email: [email protected]
RE: Proposal for Contract Amendment No. 7- Proposal for Construction Engineering Support Services
Project: Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project (PSA C00660) Dear Patrick,
Albert A. WEBB Associates (WEBB) respectfully submits this proposal to provide Construction Engineering Support Services for the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project. These services are designed to support the City of Banning during the construction phase of the Project and are consistent with the approved plans, technical specifications, City of Banning standards, and the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Green Book).

WEBB has been contracted by the City of Banning to provide engineering services for the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project. As the Project transitions into construction, additional engineering support is required to assist the City with material submittal reviews, responses to Requests for Information (RFIs), verification of grading quantities, preparation of record drawings, and participation in construction progress meetings.

The following proposal outlines WEBB’s understanding of the Project, the Exhibit “A” scope of services to be provided, and the Exhibit “B” proposed compensation for the scope of services.

If you find this proposal acceptable, please issue a contract amendment or task authorization to proceed. We appreciate the opportunity to continue supporting the City of Banning on the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 951-830-4305.

Sincerely,
ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
Dilesh Sheth, PE, TE
Senior Vice President
844

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
The Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project includes roadway, drainage, utility, signing, and striping, as well as related infrastructure improvements, between Highland Home Road and Sunset Avenue. During construction, the City requires ongoing engineering support to ensure the Project is constructed in general conformance with the approved plans, specifications, and City standards, while addressing field conditions, coordination issues, and Contractor inquiries.

The City will provide the construction management and inspection services, while WEBB will provide construction engineering support services.

EXHIBIT “A” SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1 – Construction Engineering Administration and Coordination WEBB will provide construction engineering support throughout the duration of construction, including:
 Coordination with the City Construction Manager, Resident Engineer/Inspector, and Contractor
 Interpretation of approved plans, specifications, and contract documents  Engineering support related to constructability and field conditions  Identification of potential impacts to design intent, scope, or schedule for City consideration
Task 2 – Material Submittal Review
WEBB will review Contractor material submittals for general conformance with the Contract Documents prior to construction or installation.

Services include:
 Logging and tracking submittals
 Coordinating multi-discipline reviews, as required
 Providing consolidated written comments and disposition  Reviewing resubmittals until an acceptable status is achieved  Includes a total of 20 submittal and resubmittal reviews, with an average of 1 hour of Engineer review time and 0.5 hour of Project Coordinator time per review.

Required Material Submittals (as applicable):
 Traffic Control Plans
 SWPPP / WPCP (QSD/QSP certifications)
 Earthwork and import/borrow material data
 Aggregate base and asphalt mix designs
 Portland cement concrete mix designs
 ADA detectable warning surfaces
 Storm drain pipe, structures, and appurtenances
 Signing, striping, and traffic control devices
845
 Erosion control and BMP products
 Final material certifications and warranties
Task 3 – Requests for Information (RFI) Review and Response WEBB shall provide comprehensive engineering support for the review, evaluation, coordination, and response to Contractor RFIs.

Services include:
 Logging and tracking RFIs
 Reviewing RFIs for completeness and clarity
 Coordinating internally across disciplines
 Coordinating with City staff when RFIs may affect scope, cost, or schedule  Preparing written responses consistent with City standards RFIs shall be categorized by complexity to define the level of engineering effort required:

A. Simple RFIs (10)
Typically include:
 Clarification of notes, dimensions, quantities, or plan references  Interpretation of standard details or specifications
 Field questions that can be resolved without design modification Services include:
 Review and written response
 Minor plan markup or reference to contract documents. Includes a total of 10 RFIs, with an average of 2 hours of the Engineer’s time and 1 hour of the Project Coordinator and Project Manager’s time per RFI.

B. Medium-Complexity RFIs (5)
Typically include:
 Coordination between multiple disciplines
 Minor design refinements or field-driven adjustments
 Utility or drainage clarifications requiring limited analysis  Supplemental sketches or exhibits
Services include:
 Internal coordination and technical evaluation
 Preparation of clarification sketches or exhibits
 Written response with supporting documentation
 Medium plan markup or reference to contract documents. Includes a total of 5 RFIs, with an average of 4 hours of the Engineer’s time and 1 hour of the Project Coordinator's time per RFI.
846
C. Complex RFIs (5)
Typically include:
 Differing site conditions
 Conflicts with existing utilities
 Discrepancies between plans and field conditions
 Utility conflicts requiring evaluation of alternatives  Drainage, grading, or roadway geometry impacts
 RFIs with potential cost, schedule, or scope implications  Issues requiring coordination with outside agencies or third parties Services include:
 Engineering analysis and evaluation of alternatives
 Coordination meetings with the City and project stakeholders  Preparation of detailed response narratives and supporting exhibits  Plan markup or reference to contract documents. Includes a total of 5 RFIs, with an average of 8 hours of the Engineer’s time and 1 hour of the Project Coordinator's time per RFI.

Identification of potential impacts for City consideration Task 4 – Construction Progress Meetings
WEBB will attend construction progress meetings (a total of 24) as requested by the City, 8 inperson meetings and 16 virtual meetings.

Task 5 – Grading Quantity Verification
WEBB shall perform grading quantity calculations for earthwork pay quantities based on survey data provided by the Contractor.

Services include:
 Review of Contractor-provided pre- and post-construction survey surfaces  Independent calculation of excavation, fill, and import/export quantities  Coordination with City staff and the Inspector to resolve discrepancies All field surveying shall be performed by the Contractor. WEBB’s role is limited to office-based quantity verification.

Task 6 – Record Drawings (As-Built Plans)
WEBB shall prepare Record Drawings for City acceptance.

Services include:
 Incorporating approved RFIs, field directives, and clarifications  Reviewing Contractor redline drawings
847
 Updating plan sheets to reflect final constructed conditions Record Drawings shall be based on information provided by the Contractor and City. WEBB shall not be responsible for independent field verification.

EXHIBIT “B” COMPENSATION FOR SCOPE OF SERVICES
WEBB proposes to provide the Construction Engineering Support Services on a time-andmaterials basis, billed monthly in accordance with the attached Schedule of Fees.

The total fee for services described in Exhibit “A” shall not exceed $78,624 without prior written authorization from the City.
848
AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
(C00660) FOR THE DESIGN OF SUN LAKES BOULEVARD

EXTENSION BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF BANNING AND ALBERT
A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES (“Amendment No. 6”) by and between the CITY OF BANNING (“City”) and ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES, a California Corporation (“Consultant”) is effective as of this day: __________________________.

RECITALS
A. City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement for Professional Design Services dated June 23, 2020 (“Agreement”) whereby Consultant agreed to provide Design Services for the Design of Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension following a Request for Proposals for an amount not to exceed Five Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Four Hundred Sixteen Dollars and Five Cents ($548,416.05). The agreement included a 10% Contingency of Fifty-Four Thousand Eight Hundred Forty-One Dollars and Sixty-One Cents ($54,841.61) for a total contract amount of Six Hundred Three Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty-Five Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($603,725.66). The Term of the Agreement was to commence on June 23, 2020, and continue in full force and effect until October 3, 2022.

B. On February 11, 2022, Public Works Department approved a change order to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for out-of-scope work including coordination with Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) in the amount of $24,983.25, leaving a contingency balance of $29,858.36.

C. On March 21, 2022, Public Works Department approved a change order to the Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, Inc. for the preparation of a sediment transport analysis (out of scope) in the amount of $5,974.88, leaving a contingency balance of $23,883.48.

D. On August 23, 2022, City Council adopted City Council Resolution 2022-106 which authorized the increase in compensation for services provided under the agreement by One Hundred Twenty-Nine Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($129,400.00).

E. On October 11, 2022, City Council Adopted City Council Resolution 2022-139 to rescind Resolution 2022-106 and amend the Agreement to include additional compensation in the amount of One Hundred Forty Eight Thousand Two Hundred Twenty Two Dollars ($148,222.00) for a new contract total of Seven Hundred Fifty One Thousand Nine Hundred Forty Seven Dollars and Sixty Six Cents ($751,947.66) and to extend the term of the Agreement through June 30, 2024.

F. On October 23, 2023, City and Consultant amended the Agreement to modify the Scope of Services, extend the Term of the Agreement to June 30, 2025, and increase the 849
Contract Sum by Four Hundred Ninety Six Thousand Seventy Nine Dollars ($496,079.00) for a total not to exceed amount of One Million Two Hundred Forty Eight Thousand Twenty Six Dollars and Sixty Six Cents ($1,248,026.66).

G. On January 6, 2025, City and Consultant amended the Agreement to extend the Term of the Agreement to June 30, 2026.

H. On May 27, 2025, City and Consultant amended the Agreement to modify the Scope of Services and increase the Contract Sum to One Million Three Hundred Five Thousand One Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($1,305,106.66) as approved by City Council Resolution No. 2025-070.

I. On August 26, 2025, City and Consultant amended the Agreement to modify the Scope of Services and increase the Contract Sum to One Million Three Hundred Sixty-Four Thousand Seven Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($1,364,706.66) as approved by Council Resolution No 2025-116.

J. City and Consultant now desire to amend the Agreement to extend the Term of the Agreement to December 31, 2027, and increase the Contract Sum to One Million Four Hundred Forty-Three Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($1,443,330.66).

The Parties therefore agree follows:

1. Amended Terms. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

1.1 The maximum compensation for the Services performed pursuant to this Amendment No. 6 shall not exceed Seventy-Eight Thousand Six Hundred Twenty-Four Dollars ($78,624.00) thereby increasing the Contract Sum, as set forth in Section 2.1 of the Agreement, to One Million Four Hundred Forty-Three Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($1,443,330.66).

1.2 The Term of the Agreement, as set forth in Section 3.4 of the Agreement, is hereby extended through December 31, 2027, unless sooner terminated or extended as provided in the Agreement.

2. Miscellaneous Provisions

2.1 Continued Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 6, all provisions of the Agreement, as amended by Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 6, whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement, as amended by Amendment Nos. 1 through 6. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of this Amendment 850
No. 6 and the provisions of the Agreement or Amendments No. 1 through 6, the provisions of this Amendment No. 6 shall control.

2.2 Consideration for Amendment. The parties hereby agree that they have each received adequate and independent consideration for the modifications to the Agreement set forth in this Amendment No. 6.

2.3 Authority. The persons executing this Amendment No. 6 on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Amendment No. 6 on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Amendment No. 6, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Amendment No. 6, and (iv) entering into this Amendment No. 6 does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which said party is bound.

2.4 Counterparts. This Amendment No. 6 may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be an original, but all of which together will constitute one instrument.

2.5 Electronic Signatures. Each Party may adopt as its signature an electronic identification consisting of a symbol or code that is affixed to or contained in each document transmitted by such Party (“electronic signature”). The Parties hereto herby agree that electronic signatures are acceptable, shall have the same force and effect under the law as original wet signatures, and shall be sufficient to verify that the Parties have executed this Agreement and such other documents transmitted by the Parties.
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
851
The Parties are signing this Amendment No. 6 on the date stated in the introductory clause.

CITY OF BANNING CONSULTANT

Elizabeth Gibbs,
City Manager
NAME:

TITLE:

City Council Approval: _______________ NAME:

TITLE:

ATTEST:

Sandra Calderon
Administrative City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Slovak, Baron, Empey, Murphy & Pinkney
LLP
John O. Pinkney
City Attorney

NOTE: PROOF OF AUTHORITY TO BIND CONTRACTING PARTY REQUIRED.

APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE

BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY.
852
January 15, 2026
Patrick Safari, CIP Manager
City of Banning
99 E. Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220
Sent via email: [email protected]
RE: Proposal for Contract Amendment No. 7- Proposal for Construction Engineering Support Services
Project: Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project (PSA C00660) Dear Patrick,
Albert A. WEBB Associates (WEBB) respectfully submits this proposal to provide Construction Engineering Support Services for the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project. These services are designed to support the City of Banning during the construction phase of the Project and are consistent with the approved plans, technical specifications, City of Banning standards, and the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Green Book).

WEBB has been contracted by the City of Banning to provide engineering services for the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project. As the Project transitions into construction, additional engineering support is required to assist the City with material submittal reviews, responses to Requests for Information (RFIs), verification of grading quantities, preparation of record drawings, and participation in construction progress meetings.

The following proposal outlines WEBB’s understanding of the Project, the Exhibit “A” scope of services to be provided, and the Exhibit “B” proposed compensation for the scope of services.

If you find this proposal acceptable, please issue a contract amendment or task authorization to proceed. We appreciate the opportunity to continue supporting the City of Banning on the Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 951-830-4305.

Sincerely,
ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
Dilesh Sheth, PE, TE
Senior Vice President
853

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
The Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension Project includes roadway, drainage, utility, signing, and striping, as well as related infrastructure improvements, between Highland Home Road and Sunset Avenue. During construction, the City requires ongoing engineering support to ensure the Project is constructed in general conformance with the approved plans, specifications, and City standards, while addressing field conditions, coordination issues, and Contractor inquiries.

The City will provide the construction management and inspection services, while WEBB will provide construction engineering support services.

EXHIBIT “A” SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1 – Construction Engineering Administration and Coordination WEBB will provide construction engineering support throughout the duration of construction, including:

Coordination with the City Construction Manager, Resident Engineer/Inspector, and Contractor
Interpretation of approved plans, specifications, and contract documents Engineering support related to constructability and field conditions Identification of potential impacts to design intent, scope, or schedule for City consideration
Task 2 – Material Submittal Review
WEBB will review Contractor material submittals for general conformance with the Contract Documents prior to construction or installation.

Services include:

Logging and tracking submittals
Coordinating multi-discipline reviews, as required
Providing consolidated written comments and disposition Reviewing resubmittals until an acceptable status is achieved Includes a total of 20 submittal and resubmittal reviews, with an average of 1 hour of Engineer review time and 0.5 hour of Project Coordinator time per review.

Required Material Submittals (as applicable):

Traffic Control Plans
SWPPP / WPCP (QSD/QSP certifications)
Earthwork and import/borrow material data
Aggregate base and asphalt mix designs
Portland cement concrete mix designs
ADA detectable warning surfaces
Storm drain pipe, structures, and appurtenances
Signing, striping, and traffic control devices
854
Erosion control and BMP products
Final material certifications and warranties
Task 3 – Requests for Information (RFI) Review and Response WEBB shall provide comprehensive engineering support for the review, evaluation, coordination, and response to Contractor RFIs.

Services include:

Logging and tracking RFIs
Reviewing RFIs for completeness and clarity
Coordinating internally across disciplines
Coordinating with City staff when RFIs may affect scope, cost, or schedule Preparing written responses consistent with City standards RFIs shall be categorized by complexity to define the level of engineering effort required:

A. Simple RFIs (10)
Typically include:

Clarification of notes, dimensions, quantities, or plan references Interpretation of standard details or specifications
Field questions that can be resolved without design modification Services include:

Review and written response
Minor plan markup or reference to contract documents. Includes a total of 10 RFIs, with an average of 2 hours of the Engineer’s time and 1 hour of the Project Coordinator and Project Manager’s time per RFI.

B. Medium-Complexity RFIs (5)
Typically include:

Coordination between multiple disciplines
Minor design refinements or field-driven adjustments
Utility or drainage clarifications requiring limited analysis Supplemental sketches or exhibits
Services include:

Internal coordination and technical evaluation
Preparation of clarification sketches or exhibits
Written response with supporting documentation
Medium plan markup or reference to contract documents. Includes a total of 5 RFIs, with an average of 4 hours of the Engineer’s time and 1 hour of the Project Coordinator's time per RFI.
855
C. Complex RFIs (5)
Typically include:

Differing site conditions
Conflicts with existing utilities
Discrepancies between plans and field conditions
Utility conflicts requiring evaluation of alternatives
Drainage, grading, or roadway geometry impacts
RFIs with potential cost, schedule, or scope implications Issues requiring coordination with outside agencies or third parties Services include:

Engineering analysis and evaluation of alternatives
Coordination meetings with the City and project stakeholders Preparation of detailed response narratives and supporting exhibits Plan markup or reference to contract documents. Includes a total of 5 RFIs, with an average of 8 hours of the Engineer’s time and 1 hour of the Project Coordinator's time per RFI.

Identification of potential impacts for City consideration Task 4 – Construction Progress Meetings
WEBB will attend construction progress meetings (a total of 24) as requested by the City, 8 inperson meetings and 16 virtual meetings.

Task 5 – Grading Quantity Verification
WEBB shall perform grading quantity calculations for earthwork pay quantities based on survey data provided by the Contractor.

Services include:

Review of Contractor-provided pre- and post-construction survey surfaces Independent calculation of excavation, fill, and import/export quantities Coordination with City staff and the Inspector to resolve discrepancies All field surveying shall be performed by the Contractor. WEBB’s role is limited to office-based quantity verification.

Task 6 – Record Drawings (As-Built Plans)
WEBB shall prepare Record Drawings for City acceptance.

Services include:

Incorporating approved RFIs, field directives, and clarifications Reviewing Contractor redline drawings
856
Updating plan sheets to reflect final constructed conditions Record Drawings shall be based on information provided by the Contractor and City. WEBB shall not be responsible for independent field verification.

EXHIBIT “B” COMPENSATION FOR SCOPE OF SERVICES
WEBB proposes to provide the Construction Engineering Support Services on a time-andmaterials basis, billed monthly in accordance with the attached Schedule of Fees.

The total fee for services described in Exhibit “A” shall not exceed $78,624 without prior written authorization from the City.
857

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Elizabeth Gibbs, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Ralph Wright, Parks and Recreation Director MEETING DATE: March 24, 2026
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution 2026-53, a Resolution of the Banning City Council approving the amendment to agreement for professional services (C01207) for the Banning Armory Community Resilience Center Project by and between City of Banning and Richard Yen and Associates Architects and Planners, Inc.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2026-53
BACKGROUND:

At the October 14, 2026 City Council meeting, Council adopted Resolution 2025-143, approving an agreement between the City of Banning and Richard Yen and Associates Architects and Planners, Inc. (RY AO) for Phase I of the Banning Armory Climate Resilience Center Project. Phase I of the project is fully funded through a grant from the California Strategic Growth Council as part of the Climate Resilience Center Program. Phase I is a planning project that will include electrical infrastructure improvements to the Arthur "Art" Welch Community Center, formerly the Armory Building, and design for a future dual use facility that will include a year-round community center and a facility that will be able to support the community in the event of an emergency as a resiliency center and emergency operations center. The planning project has a compressed timeline with a completion deadline of April of 2027.

Staff is hoping to be sufficiently through enough of the planning process to apply and be awarded an implementation grant in Round # 2 of the Climate Resiliency Center Program in the Fall of 2026 or early Spring of 2027.

Staff has been working with the consultant, RY AO on the project. To date, the firm has completed necessary facility assessments, completed a Community Engagement Plan and completed significant public outreach including multiple public meetings, pop-up event engagement and survey responses providing creative ideas for the future facility.

After executing the initial contract, RY AO has requested an amendment to the contract to modify the language with regard to Section 1.1 of the agreement - performance standards from "Consultant covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the Services required hereunder and that all materials will be of good quality, and fit for the purpose intended; to "Consultant covenants that it shall follow the applicable professional standards in performing the services required hereunder and that all materials will be of good quality, and fit for the purpose intended." The consultant made the request due to complications with securing their sub-consultants due to what was deemed ambiguous language with regard to highest standards definition and amending the agreement to professional standards will enable the consultant to secure their needed sub-consultants for the project.
858
Staff presented the proposed amendment to the City Attorney for review as well as the granting agency.

Both have accepted the proposed modification.

JUSTIFICATION:

The amendment will allow the consultant to engage their chosen subconsultants as agreed to in the proposal and allow the project to be completed on time.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with the proposed amendment. The change in the agreement language has been reviewed by the City Attorney's office as well as the granting agency and both have accepted.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. CC_Resolution_2026-53_Authorizing the Amendment No. 1 to C01207.docx

2. Amendment No. 1- C01207.pdf

3. CC Resolution No. 2025-143.pdf
859
Resolution 2026-53

Page 1 of 3 ends
← All documents from this meeting