Agenda packet — Barstow City Council, June 17, 2025 (part 1 of 2)

BARSTOW CITY COUNCIL /

BARSTOW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
220 EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW STREET
BARSTOW, CA 92311
JUNE 17, 2025
5:30 PM
(HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE)
AGENDA

JOINT SPECIAL MEETING
Agenda-June 17, 2025

Page 1 of 7 ends

MAYOR
Timothy R. Silva

COUNCILMEMBERS
Carmen M. Hernandez
James M. Noble
Barbara Mae Rose
John “Tex” Williams

ELECTED CITY CLERK
Andrea Flores

ELECTED CITY TREASURER
Michael Lewis

PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
Juanantonio DeLucas
Andrew Ziemer
Beatrice Lint
Paul Niemeyer
Ted Weasma

BARSTOW FIRE PROTECTION

DISTRICT
A Subsidiary District of the City of
Barstow
Timothy R. Silva
Carmen M. Hernandez
James M. Noble
Barbara Mae Rose
John “Tex” Williams
CALL TO ORDER - CLOSED SESSION 5:30PM
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

ROLL CALL:
 Council Member Carmen Hernandez
 Council Member James Noble
 Council Member John “Tex” Williams
 Mayor Pro Tem Barbara Rose
 Mayor Timothy Silva
PARTICIPATION IS INVITED: IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD ON ANY

ITEM ON THE AGENDA, PLEASE SO INDICATE BY FILLING OUT A

SPEAKER REQUEST CARD AND HANDING IT TO THE CITY
CLERK PRIOR TO THE AGENDA ITEM BEING ADDRESSED. IF
SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS ARE REQUIRED, 48 HOURS
NOTICE MUST BE GIVEN TO THE CITY CLERK.

CODE OF ETHICS: AS YOUR ELECTED GOVERNING BOARD WE
WILL REMEMBER THE "CODE OF ETHICS" THAT WE
VOLUNTARILY AND UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. DURING THIS

MEETING WE WILL TREAT EACH OTHER AND THE PUBLIC WITH
PATIENCE, CIVILITY, AND COURTESY. THE DECISIONS MADE

TONIGHT WILL BE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE BARSTOW
COMMUNITY AND NOT FOR PERSONAL GAIN.

Agenda-June 17, 2025

Page 2 of 7 ends

PUBLIC COMMENT - CLOSED SESSION: THIS IS THE TIME AND PLACE FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC

TO ADDRESS THE GOVERNING BOARD ON MATTERS ON THE CLOSED SESSION AGENDA AND WITHIN THE CITY’S JURISDICTION. SPEAKERS ARE ASKED TO LIMIT THEIR COMMENTS TO THREE MINUTES OR LESS. ALL REQUESTS TO SPEAK MUST BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO THE AGENDA ITEM BEING ADDRESSED. IF SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS ARE REQUIRED, 48 HOURS NOTICE MUST BE GIVEN TO THE CITY CLERK.

PUBLIC COMMENT - CLOSED SESSION:

CLOSED SESSION AGENDA ITEMS:

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (GOV. CODE § 54956.9(D)(1))
The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation.

Case name: Verville, et al. v. City of Barstow, et al., San Bernardino County Superior Court Case No. CIVSB2312011

2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL; ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) & (e)(1), a point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Council, on the advice of its legal counsel, based on the belowdescribed existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation against the City. Facts and circumstances that might result in litigation but which the City believes are not yet known to potential plaintiff or plaintiffs. Number of Potential Cases: 1

3. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT
(Government Code Section 54957)
Position Title: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE DIRECTOR

4. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Conference with Labor Negotiators (Gov. Code § 54957.6) City & District Negotiators: City Manager/District Manager Rochelle Clayton Employee Organizations:

Unit 1 - Teamsters Local 1932
Unit 2 - Teamsters Local 1932
Unit 3 - Barstow Police Officers’ Association
Unit 5 - Barstow Professional Firefighters Association
Unit 6 - Barstow Management Employees’ Association
Unit 8 - Barstow Police Department Management Association All Unrepresented Employees

5. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (GOV. CODE § 54956.8) Property Address: 0424-081-10-0000 (Item 1088); 0424-081-29-0000 (Item 1089); 0424-081-43- 0000 (Item 1090); 0424-081-79-0000 (Item 1091); and 0424-081-90-0000 (Item 1092) Agency Negotiator: Rochelle Clayton
Negotiating Parties: Pacific Holt Corporation
Under Negotiation: Price and Term of payment

6. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL; ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) & (e)(1), a point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Council, on the advice of its legal counsel, based on the belowdescribed existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation against the City. Facts and circumstances that might result in litigation but which the City believes are not yet known to potential plaintiff or plaintiffs. Number of Potential Cases: 1 Agenda-June 17, 2025

Page 3 of 7 ends

REPORT OF CLOSED SESSION:

CALL TO ORDER - REGULAR MEETING 7:00 PM (or immediately following adjournment of Closed Session if adjourned after 7:00 PM):

INVOCATION: MAYOR’S CHOICE
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: MAYOR’S CHOICE
ROLL CALL:
 Council Member Carmen Hernandez
 Council Member James Noble
 Council Member John “Tex” Williams
 Mayor Pro Tem Barbara Rose
 Mayor Timothy R. Silva
PARTICIPATION IS INVITED: IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD ON ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA INCLUDING

ANY ITEM ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR, PLEASE SO INDICATE BY FILLING OUT A SPEAKER

REQUEST CARD AND HANDING IT TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE AGENDA ITEM BEING ADDRESSED. IF SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS ARE REQUIRED, 48 HOURS NOTICE MUST BE GIVEN TO THE CITY CLERK.

CODE OF ETHICS: AS YOUR ELECTED GOVERNING BOARD WE WILL REMEMBER THE "CODE OF ETHICS" THAT WE VOLUNTARILY AND UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. DURING THIS MEETING WE WILL TREAT EACH OTHER AND THE PUBLIC WITH PATIENCE, CIVILITY, AND COURTESY. THE DECISIONS

MADE TONIGHT WILL BE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE BARSTOW COMMUNITY AND NOT FOR PERSONAL GAIN.

REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF AGENDA: THIS IS THE TIME FOR MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNING BOARD TO CALL FOR REARRANGING THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA; ADDING ITEMS TO OR REMOVING ITEMS FROM THE AGENDA; OR REMOVING ITEMS FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION AND/OR SEPARATE ACTION. ITEMS MAY ONLY BE ADDED TO THE AGENDA AS ALLOWED BY STATE LAW, INCLUDING GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2, SUBDIVISION (B),

ALLOWING EMERGENCY ITEMS TO BE ADDED BY MAJORITY VOTE AND ALLOWING ITEMS THAT AROSE TO THE CITY’S ATTENTION AFTER THE AGENDA POSTING DEADLINE, BUT WHICH REQUIRE

IMMEDIATE ACTION, TO BE ADDED BY A TWO-THIRDS VOTE OF THE COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT

AT THE MEETING, OR, IF LESS THAN TWO-THIRDS OF THE COUNCIL MEMBERS ARE PRESENT, A UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE MEMBERS PRESENT.

PRESENTATIONS:

7. CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION FOR FORMER MISS BARSTOW 2024 Recommended Action:

Presentation only.

GENERAL, NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT: THIS IS THE TIME AND PLACE FOR THE GENERAL

PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE GOVERNING BOARD ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA AND WITHIN THE CITY’S JURISDICTION. SPEAKERS ARE ASKED TO LIMIT THEIR COMMENTS TO THREE MINUTES OR LESS. ALL REQUESTS TO SPEAK MUST BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO THE AGENDA ITEM BEING ADDRESSED. IF SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS ARE REQUIRED, 48 HOURS NOTICE MUST BE GIVEN TO THE CITY CLERK.

MAYOR TO ASK THE CITY CLERK IF THERE ARE ANY SPEAKERS FOR NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENTS.

Agenda-June 17, 2025

Page 4 of 7 ends

CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC COMMENT: THIS IS THE TIME AND PLACE FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE GOVERNING BOARD ON ALL MATTERS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR.

SPEAKERS ARE ASKED TO LIMIT THEIR COMMENTS ON ALL CONSENT ITEMS TO THREE MINUTES OR LESS. ALL REQUESTS TO SPEAK MUST BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO THE AGENDA ITEM BEING ADDRESSED. IF SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS ARE REQUIRED, 48 HOURS NOTICE MUST BE GIVEN TO THE CITY CLERK.

MAYOR TO ASK THE CITY CLERK IF THERE ARE ANY SPEAKERS FOR THE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS.

MINUTES ALL AGENCIES:

8. MINUTES OF THE JOINT SPECIAL MEETING - MAY 6, 2025 AT 6:00 P.M.

Recommended Action:

Approve minutes as presented.

9. MINUTES OF THE WORKSHOP - MAY 14, 2025 AT 5:30 P.M.

Recommended Action:

Approve minutes as presented.

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ALL AGENCIES: NONE
CITY COUNCIL:

10. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE 1031-2025 OF THE CITY OF BARSTOW ADOPTING

OF FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES IN THE LOCAL RESPONSIBILITY AREAS Recommended Action:

That the City Council approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 1031-2025 regarding adoption of a fire hazard severity zones in Local Responsibility Area.

11. RESOLUTION NO. _____-2025 TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS TO REAFFIRM THE LEVY AND

COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS AND ORDERING THE CITY ENGINEER TO PREPARE AN ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #1, STREET MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #1, STREET LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #1, AND FLOOD CONTROL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #1
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Approve Resolution No. _____-2025 and Initiate proceedings to reaffirm the levy and collection of annual property tax roll assessments for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 and;

2. Order the Consulting City Engineer to prepare an Engineer’s Report for Landscaping Assessment District #1, Street Maintenance Assessment District #1, Street Lighting Assessment District #1, and Flood Control Assessment District #1.

3. Set the date, time, and location of the public hearing for the reaffirmation of the annual property tax roll assessments for Tuesday, July 15, 2025, at 7:00 p.m. at 220 E. Mountain View St., Barstow, CA 92311.

4. Direct the City Clerk to publish a Notice of Public Hearing in a local newspaper of general circulation and, waive the full reading.

DISCUSSION / ACTION ON DEFERRED ITEMS: (ITEMS PREVIOUSLY TABLED OR PULLED FROM THE

CONSENT CALENDAR BY THE COUNCIL WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE GOVERNING BOARD AT THIS TIME).

BUSINESS / ACTION ITEMS:

Agenda-June 17, 2025

Page 5 of 7 ends

12. THE UNITED STATES VETERANS SUPPORT GROUP INC., A NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION,

HAS SUBMITTED A COMMUNITY PROMOTIONAL FUND (MEASURE Q) APPLICATION

REQUESTING IN-KIND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE CITY IN THE AMOUNT OF $400 TO HELP OFFSET FACILITY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH HOSTING ITS ANNUAL KIDS FUN DAY EVENT ON SATURDAY, JULY 19, 2025, AT DANA PARK.

Recommended Action:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve an in-kind donation valued at $400 to The United States Veterans Support Group Inc., a nonprofit organization, to assist with facility use fees for the Annual Kids Fun Day Event scheduled for Saturday, July 19, 2025, at Dana Park.

13. HD FAMILY EVENTS HAS SUBMITTED A COMMUNITY PROMOTIONAL FUND

APPLICATION (MEASURE Q) REQUESTING IN-KIND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE IN THE AMOUNT OF $350.10 TO HELP OFFSET PERMITTING AND WATER USE COSTS

ASSOCIATED WITH HOSTING ITS SUMMER MARKETS IN BARSTOW, SCHEDULED FOR SUNDAY, JULY 6, 2025, AND SUNDAY, AUGUST 10, 2025, AT FOGLESONG PARK. WHILE HD FAMILY EVENTS IS NOT CURRENTLY RECOGNIZED AS A 501(C)(3) NONPROFIT

ORGANIZATION, THEY HAVE SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION TO THE IRS AND ARE AWAITING FORMAL APPROVAL. THE EVENT IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE A COMMUNITY BENEFIT BY SUPPORTING LOCAL VENDORS AND OFFERING A FREE, FAMILYFRIENDLY PUBLIC GATHERING.

Recommended Action:

That the City Council approve an in-kind donation valued at $350.10 to the HD Family Events to assist with Temporary Use Permit and water fees for the Summer Markets in Barstow Event on Sunday, July 6, 2025, and Sunday, August 10, 2025 at Foglesong Park.

14. ADOPT RESOLUTION XX-2025 TO REPEAL AND REPLACE RESOLUTION NO. 5010-2020

REGARDING VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR

ANALYZING TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY ACT TO CORRECT CLERICAL ERROR
Recommended Action:

Adopt a Resolution No XX-2025 to repeal and replace Resolution No. 5010-2020 to correct a clerical error in the Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) threshold language to determine the significance of a project’s environmental effects, consistent with adopted County thresholds and intent of the Resolution No. 5010-2020.

15. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2025/2026 PROPOSED

OPERATING AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET, APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT,

INVESTMENT POLICY, AND THE PUBLICLY AVAILABLE PAY SCHEDULE FOR BUDGETED

POSITIONS AND NEWLY ADDED POSITIONS
Recommended Action:

That the City Council and Barstow Fire Protection District Board take the following actions:

1. That City Council approve the Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Proposed Operating and Capital Improvement Budget for the City in the amount of $68,156,966 and adopt the attached Joint Resolution No. XXXX-2025 (Attachment B), approving the Proposed Budget (Attachment A), including any City Council amendments (if any), and excluding the Barstow Fire Protection District Budget – Fund 225, and waive the full reading.

2. That the Fire Protection District Board approve and adopt a preliminary budget for the Barstow Fire Protection District in the amount $6,538,500 and adopt the attached Joint Resolution No. XXXX-2025 (Attachment B), approving and adopting the preliminary Budget (Attachment A) as submitted pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 13893(a)(1) and waive the full reading.

3. Approve the annual 2025/2026 appropriations limit, which is calculated using the change in the growth in California personal income and the change in population growth of the City/County, which are determined by the State of California, and adopt City of Barstow Resolution No. XXXX-2025, and BFPD Resolution No. XXXX-2025, establishing the appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2025/2026, by title only and waive the reading.

Agenda-June 17, 2025

Page 6 of 7 ends

4. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. XXXX-2025 approving the publicly available pay schedule (PAPS) (Attachment C)

5. That the City Council Adopt the Investment Policy and Resolution No. XXXX-2025 of the City of Barstow for FY 2025/2026.

6. Provide direction to staff for the use of Measure Q Fund Balance for one-time safety related expenditures.

PUBLIC HEARINGS:

16. FIRST READING AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 9.74, AND AMENDING SECTIONS 19.14.030, 19.16.020, AND 19.16.030 OF THE BARSTOW

MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SMOKE SHOPS AND TOBACCO STORES Recommended Action:

That the City Council continue the public hearing to July 15, 2025, and on July 15, 2025, to consider the introduction of Ordinance No. XXXX-2025 limiting the proliferation of Smoke Shops and Tobacco Stores with the City of Barstow and amending the Barstow Municipal Code to add a new chapter 9.74 and update sections 19.14.030, 19.16.020, and 19.16.030 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Barstow.

17. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING AND ESTABLISHING SPECIFIED FEES FOR CITY SERVICES (FY 2025/2026) Recommended Action:

That City Council adopt Resolution No. XXXX-2025 amending and establishing the Master Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2025/2026, and waive the full reading.

18. REVIEW THE CITY’S MILITARY EQUIPMENT ANNUAL REPORT AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. XXXX-2025 TO RENEW ORDINANCE NO. 989-2022, APPROVING THE CITY’S MILITARY

EQUIPMENT POLICY, AS REQUIRED BY CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 7070. THE BARSTOW POLICE DEPARTMENT IS COMMITTED TO TRANSPARENCY,

PUBLIC TRUST, COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH LEGAL REQUIREMENTS.

Recommended Action:

That the City Council approve the 2024 Military Equipment Annual Report and adopt Resolution No.XXXX-2025 renewing Ordinance No. 989-2022, which approved the Department’s military equipment funding, acquisition, and use policy pursuant to Assembly Bill 481. The renewal of the proposed ordinance is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(2,5).

19. PUBLIC HEARING – CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TERMINATION FOR COMMERCIAL CANNABIS BUSINESS OPERATOR ZENGROW, INC.

Recommended Action:

That the City Council adopt the resolution terminating the development agreement with Zengrow (Attachment 4)) and direct staff to take further steps to consummate the development agreement termination. If the development agreement is terminated, the City plans to assess its options for how to best use the property.

PUBLIC SAFETY UPDATES:

COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS:

BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL:

STAFF REPORTS:

CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: PRESENTATION
ADJOURNMENT:

Agenda-June 17, 2025

Page 7 of 7 ends

Individuals electing to later challenge any items listed herein will be limited to addressing only those issues raised at any public hearing or in written correspondence received by the Governing Board prior to the meeting.

Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the Governing Board after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk's Office at 220 East Mountain View Ste. A, Barstow, CA 92311 during normal business hours.

The City of Barstow, in complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), requests individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend and/or participate in the City meeting due to disability, to please contact the City Clerk’s Office (760) 255-5122, at least one business day prior to the scheduled meeting to ensure that we may assist you.

I hereby certify, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY that this agenda has been posted 72 hours prior to the stated meeting in a place accessible to the public.

Posted on the 13TH day of June, 2025.

Approved:
________________________
Rochelle Clayton, City Manager
Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30:PM
Maribel Hernandez
Doc ID: 6031

CLOSED SESSION AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA MATTER:

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (GOV. CODE § 54956.9(D)(1)) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

DISCUSSION:

FISCAL IMPACT:

None
The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation.

Case name: Verville, et al. v. City of Barstow, et al., San Bernardino County Superior Court Case No.

CIVSB2312011
1 Packet Pg. 8
Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30:PM
Maribel Hernandez
Doc ID: 6030

CLOSED SESSION AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA MATTER:

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ; ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

DISCUSSION:

FISCAL IMPACT:

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) & (e)(1), a point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Council, on the advice of its legal counsel, based on the below-described existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation against the City. Facts and circumstances that might result in litigation but which the City believes are not yet known to potential plaintiff or plaintiffs.

Number of Potential Cases: 1
2 Packet Pg. 9
Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30:PM
Maribel Hernandez
Doc ID: 6036

CLOSED SESSION AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA MATTER:

PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

DISCUSSION:

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.
(Government Code Section 54957)
Position Title: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE DIRECTOR
3 Packet Pg. 10
Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30:PM
Maribel Hernandez
Doc ID: 6028

CLOSED SESSION AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA MATTER:

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

DISCUSSION:

FISCAL IMPACT:

Conference with Labor Negotiators (Gov. Code § 54957.6) City & District Negotiators: City Manager/District Manager Rochelle Clayton Employee Organizations:

CLOSED SESSION AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA MATTER:

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (GOV. CODE § 54956.8) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

DISCUSSION:

FISCAL IMPACT:

Property Address: 0424-081-10-0000 (Item 1088); 0424-081-29-0000 (Item 1089); 0424-081-43-0000 (Item 1090); 0424-081-79-0000 (Item 1091); and 0424-081-90-0000 (Item 1092) Agency Negotiator: Rochelle Clayton
Negotiating Parties: Pacific Holt Corporation
Under Negotiation: Price and Term of payment
5 Packet Pg. 12
Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30:PM
Maribel Hernandez
Doc ID: 6032

CLOSED SESSION AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA MATTER:

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ; ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

DISCUSSION:

FISCAL IMPACT:

Number of Potential Cases: 1
6 Packet Pg. 13
Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30 PM
City Clerk / Records
Maria Chavez
Presentation
Doc ID: 5996

AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA MATTER:

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION FOR FORMER MISS BARSTOW 2024 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

A Certificate of Appreciation will be presented to Former Miss Barstow 2024, Ella Jo Massimini.

DISCUSSION:

Mayor Silva and the City Council will present a certificate of appreciation to Ella Jo Massimini, former Miss Barstow 2024.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Presentation only.
7 Packet Pg. 14
Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30 PM
City Clerk / Records
Maribel Hernandez
Other
Doc ID: 6005

AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA MATTER:

MINUTES OF THE JOINT SPECIAL MEETING - MAY 6, 2025 AT 6:00 P.M.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

DISCUSSION:

FISCAL IMPACT:
none
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Approve minutes as presented.
8 Packet Pg. 15

BARSTOW CITY COUNCIL /

BARSTOW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
220 EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW STREET
BARSTOW, CA 92311
MAY 6, 2025
6:00 PM
(HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE)

MINUTES

JOINT SPECIAL MEETING
Minutes-May 6, 2025

Page 1 of 20 ends

CALL TO ORDER - CLOSED SESSION:

MAYOR SILVA called the closed session meeting to order at 6:00 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

MAYOR PRO TEM ROSE led the Pledge of Allegiance.

ROLL CALL:

Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
James M. Noble Council Member Present
Barbara Mae Rose Mayor Pro Tem Present
John Williams Council Member Present
Carmen Hernandez Council Member Present
Timothy Silva Mayor Present
PARTICIPATION IS INVITED : IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD ON ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA, PLEASE

SO INDICATE BY FILLING OUT A SPEAKER REQUEST CARD AND HANDING IT TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE AGENDA ITEM EING ADDRESSED. IF SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS ARE REQUIRED, 48 HOURS NOTICE MUST BE GIVEN TO THE CITY CLERK.

MADE TONIGHT WILL BE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE BARSTOW COMMUNITY AND NOT FOR PERSONAL GAIN.

PUBLIC COMMENT - CLOSED SESSION: THIS IS THE TIME AND PLACE FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC

NO SPEAKERS

8.a
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: 05.06.2025 Minutes AF (6005 : Minutes of the Joint Special Meeting May 6, 2025 6:00 PM) Minutes-May 6, 2025

Page 2 of 20 ends

MOTION TO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION:

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Carmen Hernandez, Council Member
SECONDER: Barbara Mae Rose, Mayor Pro Tem
AYES: Noble, Rose, Williams, Hernandez, Silva
CLOSED SESSION AGENDA ITEMS:

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Recommended Action:

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) & (e)(1), a point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Council, on the advice of its legal counsel, based on the belowdescribed existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation against the City. Facts and circumstances that might result in litigation but which the City believes are not yet known to potential plaintiff or plaintiffs. (Government Code Section 54956.9(e)(1)) Number of Potential Cases: 1

2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Recommended Action:

Conference with Labor Negotiators (Gov. Code § 54957.6) City & District Negotiators: City Manager/District Manager Rochelle Clayton Employee Organizations:

CITY ATTORNEY, MATTHEW SUMMERS reported the following:
- The council met in closed session to discuss two items, the first one regarding anticipated litigation and the second one regarding conference with labor negotiators direction was provided to counsel with no reportable action taken.

CALL TO ORDER - REGULAR MEETING 7:00 PM (or immediately following adjournment of Closed Session if adjourned after 7:00 PM):

MAYOR SILVA called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM
INVOCATION:

COUNCIL MEMBER NOBLE led the invocation.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS led the Pledge of Allegiance.

8.a
Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: 05.06.2025 Minutes AF (6005 : Minutes of the Joint Special Meeting May 6, 2025 6:00 PM) Minutes-May 6, 2025

Page 3 of 20 ends

ROLL CALL:

Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
Timothy Silva Mayor Present
James M. Noble Council Member Present
John Williams Council Member Present
Carmen Hernandez Council Member Present
Barbara Mae Rose Mayor Pro Tem Present
PARTICIPATION IS INVITED: IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD ON ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA INCLUDING

ANY ITEM ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR, PLEASE SO INDICATE BY FILLING OUT A SPEAKER REQUEST CARD AND HANDING IT TO THE CITY CLERK. IF SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS ARE REQUIRED, 48 HOURS NOTICE MUST BE GIVEN TO THE CITY CLERK.

MADE TONIGHT WILL BE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE BARSTOW COMMUNITY AND NOT FOR PERSONAL GAIN.

ALLOWING EMERGENCY ITEMS TO BE ADDED BY MAJORITY VOTE AND ALLOWING ITEMS THAT AROSE TO THE CITY’S ATTENTION AFTER THE AGENDA POSTING DEADLINE, BUT WHICH REQUIRE

IMMEDIATE ACTION, TO BE ADDED BY A TWO-THIRDS VOTE OF THE COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT

AT THE MEETING, OR, IF LESS THAN TWO-THIRDS OF THE COUNCIL MEMBERS ARE PRESENT, A UNANIMOUS VOTE OF THOSE MEMBERS PRESENT.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: James M. Noble, Council Member
SECONDER: Barbara Mae Rose, Mayor Pro Tem
AYES: Noble, Rose, Williams, Hernandez, Silva
PRESENTATIONS:

3. QUARTERLY TREASURER'S REPORT - OCT 2024 - DEC 2024
Recommended Action:

Presentation only.

CITY TREASURER MIKE LEWIS
- Presented the staff report as filed with the City Clerk's office.

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON
- Clarified that an update is coming to explain Restricted Funds. - Mentioned that during the budget process when the investment policy is presented for its annual update, a resolution will also be presented to the council to recommend that the Finance Director, Sydnie Harris will be named Deputy City Treasurer.

8.a
Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: 05.06.2025 Minutes AF (6005 : Minutes of the Joint Special Meeting May 6, 2025 6:00 PM) Minutes-May 6, 2025

Page 4 of 20 ends

SPEAKERS

MIKE HERNANDEZ, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Asked how much money is in the Measure Q Fund.
- Why has it taken over a year to bring the quarterly report forward?

QUESTIONS

MAYOR PRO TEM ROSE
- Asked if the Treasurer's Report was available online. - Recommended that the City Treasurer be present at the City Council Meetings.

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON
- Clarified that the Treasurer's Report was available to the public when the current agenda was posted on the city's website.

COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS
- Asked how the city got the 31 Million Dollars for investments. - Asked if the city is currently investing any money.
- Asked if any Measure Q money is being invested and if the sole purpose of these funds was for investments.
- Asked how much of the Measure Q money is being invested. Would like to see those figures available.

CITY TREASURER MIKE LEWIS
- Clarified that this is money the city obtains through property taxes, sales taxes, gas taxes, etc. - Mentioned currently the city has money invested in LAIF, which is through the State and the California Class Investment, which both earn about 4% interest rate.

FINANCE DIRECTOR SYDNIE HARRIS
- Clarified Measure Q was part of the General Fund, so when they look at the account balance, they look at the overall account balance.

CITY ATTORNEY, MATTHEW SUMMERS
- Mentioned Measure Q was passed by the voters for the money to be spent on the funds that were part of the ballot measure, which is a general tax. - Noted the Finance Department does allocate the interest earned to Measure Q or Measure I, noted the money does get tracked back to where the money came from.

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON
- Clarified that this is very similar to having money in a savings account that is earning interest and can be transferred to a checking account when needed.

Motion made by MAYOR PRO TEM ROSE, seconded by COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS, to add these additional reports to the investment report.

COMMENTS

COUNCIL MEMBERS HERNANDEZ
- Would like to see a Measure Q training to explain the intent of the measure, and would like the City Attorney to be present for clarification.

RESULT: PRESENTATION ONLY

8.a
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: 05.06.2025 Minutes AF (6005 : Minutes of the Joint Special Meeting May 6, 2025 6:00 PM) Minutes-May 6, 2025

Page 5 of 20 ends

GENERAL, NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT: THIS IS THE TIME AND PLACE FOR THE GENERAL

SPEAKERS

MIKE HERNANDEZ, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Clarified that the 1.6 Million Dollars for the Fire Engine has to be paid up front. - Asked why the collected interest from the different accounts had not been reported. - Asked for information regarding the new Assistant City Manager. - Asked why city accounts had not been monitored.
- Would like to see more accountability from staff.
- Expressed concerns with the council members and code enforcement. - Would like to see the city's properties get cleaned.

TED WEASMA, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Expressed concerns with the lack of handicap parking spaces in front of the city offices. - Noted, city vehicles should not take parking spaces in the front parking lot. - Congratulated the council for their selection of the planning commissioners.

JIM BROWN, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Spoke about an article in the newspaper and expressed his concerns with the lack of accountability from the council.

VIRGINIA BROWN, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Spoke about issues she was having with code enforcement. - Thanked the staff for cleaning a public area across from her property. - Expressed concerns with the new changes on the agenda and with the City Treasurer not being available at the meetings when requested by the public.

ET SNELL, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Expressed concerns with the lack of handicap carts at local stores, would like to see the city do something about it.
- Spoke about an article in the newspaper regarding the Barstow League Leadership. - Asked why the City Treasurer does not attend the city council's regular meetings. - Expressed concerns with the lack of response from staff.

MARSHA WEASMA, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Asked if cannabis money has been invested.
- Asked why there is no appeal process to address the people. - Asked for the policy for the Measure Q members' terms and requirements.

KATHIE AGUAYO, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Expressed concerns with her vehicle being towed without a reason.

CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC COMMENT: THIS IS THE TIME AND PLACE FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE GOVERNING BOARD ON ALL MATTERS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR.

No comments on consent.

8.a
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: 05.06.2025 Minutes AF (6005 : Minutes of the Joint Special Meeting May 6, 2025 6:00 PM) Minutes-May 6, 2025

Page 6 of 20 ends

MINUTES ALL AGENCIES:

4. MINUTES JOINT SPECIAL TRAINING MEETING - MARCH 31, 2025, AT 6:00 P.M.

Recommended Action:

Approve minutes as presented.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Carmen Hernandez, Council Member
SECONDER: James M. Noble, Council Member
AYES: Noble, Rose, Williams, Hernandez, Silva

5. MINUTES JOINT SPECIAL MEETING - APRIL 7, 2025, AT 5:00 P.M.

Recommended Action:

Approve minutes as presented.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Carmen Hernandez, Council Member
SECONDER: James M. Noble, Council Member
AYES: Noble, Rose, Williams, Hernandez, Silva

6. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - APRIL 21, 2025, AT 6:00 P.M.

Recommended Action:

Approve minutes as presented.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Carmen Hernandez, Council Member
SECONDER: James M. Noble, Council Member
AYES: Noble, Rose, Williams, Hernandez, Silva
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ALL AGENCIES:

7. RATIFICATION OF ACCOUNTS PAYABLE EXPENDITURES
Recommended Action:

Approve and ratify expenses, as audited, checks #99110-99418 totaling $6,020,428.22 and wires #1116-1125 totaling $622,007.86, per the Agency breakdown below:

City: $6,458,635.78
Fire: $183,000.30
Successor Agency: $0.00
Grand Total: $6,642,436.08
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Carmen Hernandez, Council Member
SECONDER: James M. Noble, Council Member
AYES: Noble, Rose, Williams, Hernandez, Silva
CITY COUNCIL:

8. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BARSTOW DECLARING ITS

INTENTION TO SET THE TIME, DATE AND PLACE FOR A PROTEST HEARING FOR PROPERTY ABATEMENT COSTS AND PENALTIES FOR MAY 20, 2025 AT 7:00 PM. APN # 0181-091-05-0000 & 0181-091-27-0000

8.a
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: 05.06.2025 Minutes AF (6005 : Minutes of the Joint Special Meeting May 6, 2025 6:00 PM) Minutes-May 6, 2025

Page 7 of 20 ends

Recommended Action:

Approve Resolution No. 5214-2025, setting the date and time for a protest hearing for Property Abatement Costs and Penalties for Tuesday, May 20, 2025, at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers and waive the full reading for APN # 0181-091-05-0000 & 0181-091-27-0000.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Carmen Hernandez, Council Member
SECONDER: James M. Noble, Council Member
AYES: Noble, Rose, Williams, Hernandez, Silva

9. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BARSTOW DECLARING ITS

INTENTION TO SET THE TIME, DATE AND PLACE FOR A PROTEST HEARING FOR PROPERTY ABATEMENT COSTS AND PENALTIES FOR MAY 20, 2025 AT 7:00 PM. APN # 0181-247-04-0000
Recommended Action:

Approve Resolution No. 5215-2025, setting the date and time for a protest hearing for Property Abatement Costs and Penalties for Tuesday, May 20, 2025, at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers and waive the full reading for APN# 181-241-04-0000.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Carmen Hernandez, Council Member
SECONDER: James M. Noble, Council Member
AYES: Noble, Rose, Williams, Hernandez, Silva
DISCUSSION / ACTION ON DEFERRED ITEMS:

NONE
BUSINESS / ACTION ITEMS:

10. APPROVAL OF PROPOSED MURAL DESIGNS – MCLB BARSTOW MURAL AT 621 E. MAIN

STREET & EARTH DAY ELECTRICAL BOX MURAL AT THE CORNER OF BARSTOW ROAD

AND VIRGINIA WAY
Recommended Action:

Approve the proposed mural renderings

1. MCLB Barstow Mural located at 621 E. Main Street &

2. Earth Day Mural on the Electrical Box at the Corner of Barstow Road and Virginia Way

CITY CLERK SERVICES MANAGER MARIBEL HERNANDEZ & MAIN STREET MURALS

REPRESENTATIVE JANE LARAMAN-BROCKHURST
- Presented the staff report as filed with the City Clerk's office.

CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
- Thanked Main Street Murals for all the work they do.

DISCUSSION

COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ
- Asked which school will be next?
- Noted she is looking forward to the next project.

8.a
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: 05.06.2025 Minutes AF (6005 : Minutes of the Joint Special Meeting May 6, 2025 6:00 PM) Minutes-May 6, 2025

Page 8 of 20 ends

MAYOR SILVA
- Noted he attended one of their tours, which was a great experience.

MAIN STREET MURALS REPRESENTATIVE JANE LARAMAN-BROCKHURST - Mentioned they have tours on the 3rd Saturday of the month, and they meet at the Fountain outside US Bank.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Barbara Mae Rose, Mayor Pro Tem
SECONDER: James M. Noble, Council Member
AYES: Noble, Rose, Williams, Hernandez, Silva

11. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC FACILITY VENTILATION UPGRADES AT THE CORA HARPER COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT TO ALLISON MECHANICAL INC. PROJECT #2024-1000
Recommended Action:

1. City staff recommends that the City Council award the contract to Allison Mechanical, Inc. for the ventilation upgrades at the Cora Harper Community Center Project (“Project’).

2. Approve an overall budget of $1,781,010, inclusive of a 5% contingency.

3. Approve the allocation of $316,344 in CDBG-CV (COVID-19) funds, $140,281 in unprogrammed CDBG funds, and the reallocation of $222,739 in CDBG funds originally designated for the ADA Curb Ramps and Infrastructure Improvements Project to the Cora Harper HVAC Improvement Project.

4. Acknowledge the existing CDBG award of $213,809 for the Project.

5. Authorize City staff to pursue additional funding sources to cover the remaining project cost balance, including a 5% contingency.

6. Request the City Council authorize an additional appropriation of $887,837 from Measure Q to cover the unfunded project balance

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHRIS HELDRETH & CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE

CLAYTON
- Presented the staff report as filed with the City Clerk's office.

FINANCE DIRECTOR SYDNIE HARRIS
- Explained that the city had the opportunity with the financing of the fire truck to pay the entire amount of 1 million and 20 thousand dollars in smaller amounts. - Noted one of the options was to pay $150,000 annually over 20 years, which would free up the remaining balance of the $1,020,000 to pay for other projects. - Noted her recommendation was to finance the fire truck to allow the opportunity not to hinder cash flow and have more opportunities to obtain other assets if necessary, vs paying cash out of pocket for the full amount.

COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ
- Asked if there are other funds available for use, like CDBG funds. - Asked how long it will take to complete this project. - Expressed concerns about how the tariffs will affect this project. - Noted she was concerned about the city not having a cooling center.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHRIS HELDRETH
- Clarified that there are funds available in CDBG that need to be spent, or the county will penalize the city for not spending them.
- Mentioned that there will be temporary cooling systems installed at the gym to get through the hotter months, and to allow the contractor to receive and install all the necessary equipment. - Noted that the approximate fee for renting the temporary cooling system is about $15,000 a

8.a
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: 05.06.2025 Minutes AF (6005 : Minutes of the Joint Special Meeting May 6, 2025 6:00 PM) Minutes-May 6, 2025

Page 9 of 20 ends

month.
- Clarified that the Gym will be closed during construction.

MAYOR PRO TEM ROSE
- Asked what this project will do with the Measure Q Funds.

FINANCE DIRECTOR SYDNIE HARRIS
- Explained that by the year-end 2024 Measure Q balance was $500,000, and this was because the fire engine had not been paid for yet.
- Noted that the city will still need another $890,000 to complete the need for this project. - Mentioned that there are funds available from Measure Q, but the budget process is not finished to determine the exact number.

COUNCIL MEMBER NOBLE
- Asked when the CDBG funds had to be spent.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHRIS HELDRETH
- Explained how the CDBG funds get allocated.
- Clarified that a decision needs to be made as soon as possible.

SPEAKERS

MIKE HERNANDEZ, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Asked if they considered adding individual heating and cooling systems for each room. - Asked why the cannabis money cannot be moved over to complete this project. - Noted, other options have not been pursued, and would like to know why.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHRIS HELDRETH
- Clarified that there are exchange units in each room. - Noted, there are not mini-splits, but they all have exchangers in each room, so they have individual units in each room.

COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS
- Asked for further clarification on the financing option for the fire truck.

FINANCE DIRECTOR SYDNIE HARRIS
- Clarified that if the fire truck gets the financing option, the discount will still be applicable.

Motion made by MAYOR PRO TEM ROSE, seconded by COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ, to pay for the needs of the Cora Harper Fitness Center using Measure Q funds.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Barbara Mae Rose, Mayor Pro Tem
SECONDER: Carmen Hernandez, Council Member
AYES: Noble, Rose, Williams, Hernandez, Silva

12. ADOPT CITY COUNCIL POLICY MEMORANDUM #2025-20, CANNABIS COMMUNITY

BENEFIT PROGRAM POLICY
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Provide the percentages to which Cannabis Community Benefit Program funds can be allocated to City Projects, City-Sponsored Events, and Repairs, Maintenance and/or Upgrades.

2. Adopt City Council Policy Memorandum #2025-20, Cannabis Community Benefit Program Policy, with the inclusion of the suggested percentages agreed upon by the City Council, as per the aforementioned recommended action.

8.a
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: 05.06.2025 Minutes AF (6005 : Minutes of the Joint Special Meeting May 6, 2025 6:00 PM) Minutes-May 6, 2025

Page 10 of 20 ends

CITY ATTORNEY MATTHEW SUMMERS & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHRIS

HELDRETH
- Presented the staff report as filed with the City Clerk's office.

MAYOR PRO TEM ROSE
- Asked on Page 151 who proposed the Cannabis Community Benefit Program Percentage Examples?
- She would like to see most of the cannabis money going back to the community and not to city projects.

COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS
- Asked for more clarification regarding funds for public safety.

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON
- Explained that public safety includes Police and Fire, but this also refers to the safety of the public in the parks and roads.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHRIS HELDRETH
- Clarified that there are approximately $130,000 available for public safety.

MAYOR SILVA called for a recess at 8:52 pm
The meeting resumed at 9:01 P.M. with all members present.

MAYOR PRO TEM ROSE
- Asked how much money is available from the 3% of cannabis funds for public safety. - Would like to see where the money was spent.
- Mentioned she does not believe they have all the necessary information to make an informed decision.

FINANCE DIRECTOR SYDNIE HARRIS
- Clarified that the total revenue received as of this day was $91,937.00, the total spent was $63,000.00, with a remaining balance of $28,000.00.

CITY ATTORNEY MATTHEW SUMMERS
- Clarified the accounting systems breakdowns of the two significant cannabis fees, 3% for the retailers' fee, and the second is the $5.00 Sq. Ft facility fee on the non-retailers.

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON
- Clarified this is specifically to the Cannabis Community Benefit Program Policy, which has a balance of $777,000 that needs to be allocated.

CITY ATTORNEY MATTHEW SUMMERS
- Mentioned that this draft is focusing only on the Community Benefit fee and not the other fees. - Noted the council had already adopted a policy in the form of the budget on how to spend the $5.00 Sq. Ft. fee and the 3% fee on the retailers.
- Mentioned that the council already adopted a resolution in 2022 that requires that half of the operating fees be spent on public safety.

COUNCIL MEMBER NOBLE
- Asked for more clarification on the percentage chart presented.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHRIS HELDRETH
- Clarified the purpose of the different types of cannabis fees. - Explained the purpose of the chart presented.

8.a
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: 05.06.2025 Minutes AF (6005 : Minutes of the Joint Special Meeting May 6, 2025 6:00 PM) Minutes-May 6, 2025

Page 11 of 20 ends

- Mentioned that the fund balance can roll over to the next fiscal year.

MAYOR PRO TEM ROSE
- Clarified this refers to new City projects, not to maintain current facilities. Also clarified that when it refers to events, they are talking about new events and not existing community events.

MAYOR SILVA
- Asked what was the cost of running a committee meeting.

SPEAKERS

MIKE HERNANDEZ, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Asked for clarification, stating this item was confusing. - Noted, this fund should benefit the community as a whole.

TIFFANY GIBBONS, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Expressed concerns with staff and council, and the way they want to spend cannabis money.

MARSHA WEASMA, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Mentioned that she agrees with Mrs. Gibbons.

Motion by MAYOR PRO TEM ROSE, seconded by COUNCIL MEMBER NOBLE, to put 80% to new city projects, 15% for city-sponsored community events (new events only), and 5% to repairs, maintenance, and/or upgrades. And to include CCBP Committee. VOTE 4 - 1 Approved Cannabis Community Benefit Program Percentages
New City Projects 80%
New City-Sponsored Community Events 15%
Repairs, Maintenance, and/or Upgrades to New Projects 5% Subsequent motion by MAYOR SILVA, seconded by COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ, to put 80% to new city projects, 15% for city-sponsored community events (brand new events), and 5% to repairs, maintenance, and/or upgrades, and to remove CCBP Committee. VOTE 3 - 2 FAILED

COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS
- Asked for the reason for removing the committee.

MAYOR SILVA
- Stated the reason is that the original policy order never called for a committee, and there is a cost for a committee, and he believes the council had to be able to make decisions without a committee.

COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS
- Clarified that a committee is to tell the council what they want, and to be transparent.

MAYOR PRO TEM ROSE
- Mentioned she agreed with COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS.
- Noted, there is a need for a committee for Cannabis Community Benefit Program funds.

8.a
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: 05.06.2025 Minutes AF (6005 : Minutes of the Joint Special Meeting May 6, 2025 6:00 PM) Minutes-May 6, 2025

Page 12 of 20 ends

RESULT: APPROVED [4 TO 1]
MOVER: Barbara Mae Rose, Mayor Pro Tem
SECONDER: James M. Noble, Council Member
AYES: Noble, Rose, Williams, Silva
NAYS: Hernandez

13. ASSESSMENT AND FUNDING NEEDS FOR SPORTS PARK FIELD IMPROVEMENTS Recommended Action:

Staff is requesting direction from the City Council on the following:

1. Should staff explore the possibility of pausing or reprioritizing other planned repairs in order to reallocate approximately $125,000 for the Sports Park field improvements within the current fiscal year?

2. If immediate funding is not available, should the Sports Park field improvements be prioritized for consideration during the FY 2025-26 budget planning process?

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON
- Presented the staff report as filed with the City Clerk's office.

PUBLIC WORKS SUPERINTENDENT THOMAS ALVA
- Explained the condition of the two bottom fields at the Sports Park. - Explained the repairs his team had done to make the fields safer and efficient for players. - Clarified that there were not enough funds or time to repair all fields simultaneously.

COUNCIL MEMBER NOBLE
- Asked why the bottom field was not repaired when the upper fields were repaired. - Asked when they will be able to do the bottom fields and get them completed. - Asked if there are funds available for the repairs.

CITY ATTORNEY MATTHEW SUMMERS
- Clarified funding was the council's choice of which fields would get repaired at that time.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHRIS HELDRETH
- Noted staff decided not to do those fields because the season was starting; this was a strategic move to keep the fields in operation.
- Mentioned they did Lillian Park, the top fields at the Sports Park, and currently they are working at Foglesong Park, doing the lights.
- Noted that if funding is available, the season ends in July, and they can start the project then. - Clarified they are currently working in another field, so they will need to complete that project to be able to start a new one.

FINANCE DIRECTOR SYDNIE HARRIS
- Explained that funds were already allocated for this project, but not sure if the fence expenses were included in the budget.

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON
- Mentioned that if staff has identified a hazard, then the public cannot be allowed to remain using the area that is been identified as a hazard, and this needs to be addressed immediately.

CITY ATTORNEY MATTHEW SUMMERS
- Clarified this includes closing down any fields and areas that have been identified as hazards. - Noted that the council can allocate additional funding as the council sees fit from available funding sources to cover repairs.
- Mentioned that the City Manager and Staff can decide what represents a risk for public safety. - Noted that an inspection is necessary to address the condition of the parks.

8.a
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: 05.06.2025 Minutes AF (6005 : Minutes of the Joint Special Meeting May 6, 2025 6:00 PM) Minutes-May 6, 2025

Page 13 of 20 ends

MAYOR PRO TEM ROSE
- Noted that if these fields are a hazard, then management needs to find an alternative. - Would like to see a complete evaluation on the safety of the fields, and if these are unsafe, then an alternative schedule needs to be arranged for the players to use other fields.

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON.
- Mentioned they can schedule an emergency inspection immediately to assess the situation.

COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS
- Spoke about the hazards that had been corrected.

Motion made by MAYOR PRO TEM ROSE, seconded by COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ, to end discussion and a "call for question". VOTE 3-2

SPEAKERS

MIKE HERNANDEZ, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Noted, he does not understand what they did.
- Asked why the fence has not been repaired.
- Asked where the money to repair fields and parks is coming from. - Does not agree that all expenses are coming out of Measure Q.

MARSHA WEASMA, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Noted, it will be easier to temporarily fix the fence and wait to fix the fields until after the season is over.
- Asked what the liability will be if someone gets hurt. - Asked how long it will take to fix the fields and if a temporary arrangement can be made for the remainder of the season.

CITY ATTORNEY MATTHEW SUMMERS
- Explained that no vote has been taken for this agenda item. - Mentioned the vote was to end the discussion.

Motion made by MAYOR PRO TEM ROSE, seconded by COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ to TABLE this item. VOTE 3-2
RESULT: TABLED

14. UPDATE TO THE CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION PLAN TO AMEND

UNREPRESENTED POSITIONS, WITH NO BUDGET IMPACT
Recommended Action:

1. Approve Resolution No. 5216-2025 to update the Classification and Compensation Plan to include the positions of Administrative Services Director and Police Chief; and

2. Approve the unrepresented, at-will position of Administrative Services Director and job description.

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON
- Presented the staff report as filed with the City Clerk's office.

COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS
- Asked what the cost was to reclassify this position.
- Asked what the projection was for TOTs for year-end 2025

8.a
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: 05.06.2025 Minutes AF (6005 : Minutes of the Joint Special Meeting May 6, 2025 6:00 PM) Minutes-May 6, 2025

Page 14 of 20 ends

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON
- Explained that the position is unfilled and there will be no budget impact. - Explained the salary savings for the unfilled positions. - Mentioned that the total amount of savings for unfilled positions exceeds the last revenue on the sales tax.

FINANCE DIRECTOR SYDNIE HARRIS
- Clarified that the revenue projection for TOT for FY2025 was accurate; for this reason, no adjustment was necessary.

SPEAKERS

VIRGINIA BROWN, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Expressed concerns with one person having multiple roles and responsibilities. - Does not agree with cutting those positions at the expense of the public.

MIKE HERNANDEZ, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Expressed his concerns with the vacant positions and wanted to know the number of employees coming onboard.
- Who is monitoring the current contracts.
- Noted, more employees are needed, but it cannot be afforded.

QUESTIONS

COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS
- Asked if this will alleviate some of the workflow for the current staff.

MAYOR PRO TEM ROSE
- Asked if the PIO position is being eliminated.

MAYOR SILVA
- Asked for the number of positions proposed.
- Asked who would be monitoring contracts.

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON
- Clarified these positions will alleviate some of the workflow for current staff. - Noted the PIO position is not getting eliminated, it will remain on the pay schedule. - Mentioned that the total budgeted positions for the City Manager's office are 5 positions, and she would like to fill only 4 positions.
- Explained she would like to have herself, the Assistant City Manager's Position, if approved, the Administrative Services Director position, and the Executive Assistant for the City Manager reclassified to the higher level.
- Mentioned they are looking at the contract monitoring policy, mentioned the Finance Department is in the process of onboarding a position that could assist with that process. - Noted that the reason the position will not get eliminated is for future use. - Explained that if removed can cause future issues if the city fills that in the future.

COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ
- Noted that not only do contracts need to be monitored, but also grants.

8.a
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: 05.06.2025 Minutes AF (6005 : Minutes of the Joint Special Meeting May 6, 2025 6:00 PM) Minutes-May 6, 2025

Page 15 of 20 ends

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Carmen Hernandez, Council Member
SECONDER: James M. Noble, Council Member
AYES: Noble, Rose, Williams, Hernandez, Silva

15. PROVIDE FEEDBACK ON DRAFT ORDINANCE REGARDING SMOKE SHOPS AND

TOBACCO STORES PRIOR TO PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW
Recommended Action:

That the City Council provide direction to staff regarding potential changes to the proposed draft ordinance regulating smoke shops and tobacco stores as land uses and amending the Barstow Municipal Code to add a new chapter 9.74 and amending sections 19.14.030, 19.16.020, and

19.030 for further consideration by the Planning Commission.

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON & CITY ATTORNEY MATTHEW SUMMERS - Presented the staff report as filed with the City Clerk's office.

MAYOR SILVA
- Clarified that this agenda item was presented for discussion only, and this is agendized for approval.

COUNCIL MEMBER NOBLE
- Asked how many smoke shops are currently operating in Barstow.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHRIS HELDRETH
- Explained that there is a total of 13 smoke shops operating in Barstow, and they are setting the limit to 10.
- Mentioned that the 13 will remain in business, and if a shop is sold, they can continue to operate, but if they were to close and remain closed for over six months, then there will be no more licenses available to operate within the city limits.

MAYOR SILVA
- Noted on page 5 of the ordinance, there are currently 11 smoke shops. - Asked when this ordinance will go to the planning commission. - Asked what the distance was between smoke shops and public schools.

CITY ATTORNEY MATTHEW SUMMERS
- Noted, this ordinance will go to the next Planning Commission Meeting on May 12th, 2025. - Stated Smoke shops and tobacco stores shall not be located within 1,000 feet, measured from front door to front door, from a school (public or private), family day care home, childcare facility, youth center, community center, recreational facility, park, church or religious institution, hospital, or other similar uses where children regularly gather.
- Clarified that these special rules do not apply to stores that sell a minor amount of tobacco.

COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ
- Asked if all the owners of these businesses were notified. - Asked for more clarification on the legacy shop rules.

MAYOR PRO TEM ROSE
- Asked for more clarification on the legacy shop rules. - Noted current owners were notified, and they voiced their opinions and concerns to the committee.
- Mentioned the committee heard them and made necessary changes to have no effect current business.
- Noted after verifying the correct number of current businesses, the ordinance will be changed to reflect that number.

8.a
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: 05.06.2025 Minutes AF (6005 : Minutes of the Joint Special Meeting May 6, 2025 6:00 PM) Minutes-May 6, 2025

Page 16 of 20 ends

CITY ATTORNEY MATTHEW SUMMERS
- Noted that when this was presented to Rules and Policy for approval, current owners were protected.

SPEAKERS

EUGENE BUTTICCI, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Thanked the council and staff as all of his questions had been answered.

MIKE HERNANDEZ, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Mentioned he is glad to see the changes made.
- Expressed concern with minors being sold vaping products and would like to know who is monitoring that, as well as cannabis candies being sold to kids. - Asked if a business gets caught selling vaping or cannabis products to minors, can their license be revoked?

VIRGINIA BROWN, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Noted, she is glad this ordinance was corrected.
- Commended the staff and council for their job on this ordinance. - Spoke about a box of cannabis candy an 8-year-old gifted her and expressed concerns with the easy access of this type of product to kids.

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON
- Expressed that the Police Department monitors compliance for the sale of cannabis and tobacco products.

CITY ATTORNEY MATTHEW SUMMERS
- Explained that there is a process to revoke a license if proven that a retailer is selling products to minors.

MAYOR PRO TEM ROSE
- Expressed concerns with comments made against these retailers, stating they are selling these products to minors.
- Noted, these minors might be getting these products some other way.

COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ
- Stated she is grateful for the outcome of this ordinance. - Expressed concerns about the consumption of these products by teenagers.

Motion made by MAYOR PRO TEM ROSE, seconded by COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ, to suspend the rules 5-0

CITY ATTORNEY MATTHEW SUMMERS
- Summarized the recent changes to the ordinance.

MAYOR SILVA
- Gave direction to staff to present this ordinance as presented tonight to the Planning Commission Meeting on May 12, 2025.

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON
- Stated that the correct number of businesses within the city limits will be confirmed and added to the ordinance.
- Mentioned there was a definition that was not clarified, which will be added as well.

8.a
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: 05.06.2025 Minutes AF (6005 : Minutes of the Joint Special Meeting May 6, 2025 6:00 PM) Minutes-May 6, 2025

Page 17 of 20 ends

RESULT: PRESENTATION ONLY
PUBLIC HEARINGS:

16. 860 WEST MAIN STREET - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (PGPA-25-0001) AND ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE (PZCA-25-0001) ORDINANCE INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING Recommended Action:

RECOMMENDATION:

Conduct a public hearing and consider staff & Planning Commission recommendations to approve both the request for a Zone District Change under PZCA-25-0001 and its proposed ordinance No. 1030-2025 and General Plan Amendment under PGPA-25-0001 and its proposed resolution No. 5217-2025 to allow for change from C (Commercial) to DU (Diverse Use) zoning and land use designation.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST GENESIS CRANK
- Presented the staff report as filed with the City Clerk's office.

COUNCIL MEMBER NOBLE
- Asked if the property owner started renovations.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST GENESIS CRANK
- Clarified that staff would not allow for any renovation to start until the proposal gets approved.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHRIS HELDRETH
- Stated there was a fire at the property when renovations started with the previous owner. - Noted the current new owner has a different vision for the property.

COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ
- Asked for some clarification regarding the amendments to the General Plan.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST GENESIS CRANK
- Clarified that the Planning Commission can make 4 amendments to the General Plan a year. - Noted, this will be the first amendment of the year.
- Noted, once approved, she will be required to update the General Plan maps.

MAYOR PRO TEM ROSE
- Asked when this was approved by the Planning Commission. - Asked why the resolution was not signed.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST GENESIS CRANK
- Clarified this was approved on March 24.
- Explained the reason why the resolution was not signed.

MAYOR SILVA OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 11:08 P.M.

SPEAKERS

MIKE HERNANDEZ, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Mentioned is nice to see this project coming up, would like to see more projects like this one coming up in the near future.

EUGENE BUTTICCI, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Spoke in support of the project.

8.a
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: 05.06.2025 Minutes AF (6005 : Minutes of the Joint Special Meeting May 6, 2025 6:00 PM) Minutes-May 6, 2025

Page 18 of 20 ends

MARSHA WEASMA, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Asked the council to clean up the neighborhood around that area. - Asked what is going to be done about the extra traffic coming in with this project.

MAYOR SILVA CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 11:12 P.M.

MAYOR SILVA
- Clarified some of the concerns of Mrs. Weasma.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Carmen Hernandez, Council Member
SECONDER: James M. Noble, Council Member
AYES: Noble, Rose, Williams, Hernandez, Silva
PUBLIC SAFETY UPDATES:

No comments.

COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS:

COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ
- None.

COUNCIL MEMBER NOBLE
- Mentioned that the Military Affairs Meeting will be on May 13 at Los Domingos at 8:00 A.M. - VVTA will be meeting on May 19th at 9:30 A.M. at City Council Chambers.

COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS
- Attended the League of Cities in Big Bear, where they discussed funding for firefighters and insurance costs in zero zones.
- They spoke about funding for the railroad and the new BIG project.

MAYOR PRO TEM ROSE
- Attended Rules and Policy on April 29, where they discussed the Tobacco Retail Ordinance and the Cannabis Community Benefit Program Policy.
- Next meeting will be on May 27, 2025, at 5:00 P.M.
- Homeward Bound Meeting will be on May 8 at 5:00 P.M.

MAYOR SILVA
- Attended on April 30th the Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Committee Meeting. - Attended on May 1st and 2nd the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Conference Committee.
- Meet with City Manager Clayton and new Director for SBCTA Carrie Schindler talked about funding for local streets.

BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL:

COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ
- Mentioned Street Committee Meeting will be on May 7, and invited all to attend. - Congratulated the Museum on their great event on May 3rd. - Spoke about the Family Day Event at Saint Joseph's Church. - Spoke on the status report on the hydrants from Golden State Water, released on March 17, stating the last inspection was done in 2019.
- Wanted to know when the next inspection will be, and if there were any issues with the hydrant's

8.a
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: 05.06.2025 Minutes AF (6005 : Minutes of the Joint Special Meeting May 6, 2025 6:00 PM) Minutes-May 6, 2025

Page 19 of 20 ends

water pressure.
- Spoke about Mrs. Aguayo's concerns, would like to see a follow-up.

COUNCIL MEMBER NOBLE
- Spoke about Mrs. Aguayo's concerns.
- Mentioned he attended Fuzzy's Tacos pre-opening, noted it is a great place to eat. - Asked staff re-look at the vendors on Main Street and expressed concerns with tents popping up. - Addressed Mr. Brown's comments, noting he had never seen the video he referred to. - Planning to attend the Main Street Murals tour.

COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS
- None.

MAYOR PRO TEM ROSE
- Motioned, seconded by COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS to bring back the Fire Engine agenda item to consider financing with the short-term payout.
- Noted she attended the pre-opening and grand opening for Fuzzy’s Tacos, the re-opening of Pit Stop, and the National Day of Prayer.
- Talked about upcoming events in the city.
- Mentioned she never saw the video Mr. Brown referred to. - Would like to close the meeting in memory of a local family recently affected by a tragedy.

MAYOR SILVA
- Noted he was invited to a Women's Council on April 25th at Barstow Church of God in Christ, thanked them for the welcome.
- Attended the Birthday Party for all the Veterans for that month at the Veterans Home. - Attended the ribbon cutting for Fuzzy's Tacos.
- Attended the MCLB for the retirement of four horses of the color guard. - Attended ribbon cutting for the Pit Stop.
- Attended Public Safety Fair.
- Addressed Mr. Weasma's comments regarding the parking lot at City Hall. - Asked what the status was about moving the bus stop to Williams. - Would like staff to start looking at the names of Veterans to name streets with new developments coming to town.
- Would like to start with the names of the code talkers. - Would like to see the code talkers mural replaced or re-touched.

STAFF REPORTS:

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON
- Presented the City Manager Update.

MAYOR PRO TEM ROSE
- Would like to see the goal setting for the upcoming budget be presented to council as soon as possible.

CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:

No comments.

8.a
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: 05.06.2025 Minutes AF (6005 : Minutes of the Joint Special Meeting May 6, 2025 6:00 PM) Minutes-May 6, 2025

Page 20 of 20 ends

ADJOURNMENT:

The council took a moment of silence for the local family recently affected by a tragedy. By the consensus of the City Council and without objection, the meeting was adjourned at 11:44 PM.

Respectfully Submitted: Approved:
_______________________________ _______________________________ Andrea Flores, City Clerk Timothy R. Silva, Mayor
Notice: Signed Minutes are filed with the City Clerk’s office

8.a
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: 05.06.2025 Minutes AF (6005 : Minutes of the Joint Special Meeting May 6, 2025 6:00 PM) Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30 PM
City Clerk / Records
Maria Chavez
Other
Doc ID: 6035

AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA MATTER:

MINUTES OF THE WORKSHOP - MAY 14, 2025 AT 5:30 P.M.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

DISCUSSION:

FISCAL IMPACT:
none
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Approve minutes as presented.
9 Packet Pg. 36

WORKSHOP

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
220 EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW STREET
BARSTOW, CA 92311
MAY 14, 2025
5:30 PM
(HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE)

MINUTES

WORKSHOP
Minutes-May 14, 2025

Page 1 of 7 ends

CALL TO ORDER:

MAYOR SILVA called the workshop to order at 5:30 PM
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

MAYOR SILVA led in the Pledge of Allegiance.

ROLL CALL:

Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
James M. Noble Council Member Absent
Barbara Mae Rose Mayor Pro Tem Absent
John Williams Council Member Present
Carmen Hernandez Council Member Present
Timothy Silva Mayor Present
PARTICIPATION IS INVITED : IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD ON ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA, PLEASE

MADE TONIGHT WILL BE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE BARSTOW COMMUNITY AND NOT FOR PERSONAL GAIN.

9.a
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: 05 14 2025 WORKSHOP MINUTES FINAL AF (6035 : Minutes of the Workshop May 14, 2025 5:30 PM) Minutes-May 14, 2025

Page 2 of 7 ends

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Carmen Hernandez, Council Member
SECONDER: John Williams, Council Member
AYES: Williams, Hernandez, Silva
ABSENT: Noble, Rose
STUDY SESSION:

1. PRESENTATION OF FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Recommended Action:

Received and filed.

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON & FINANCE DIRECTOR SYDNIE HARRIS - Presented the staff report as filed with the City Clerk's office.

PARKS PRESENTATION

QUESTIONS

COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ
- Asked about the status of the Johnson Controls contract for replacing the lights at Lillian Park.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHRIS HELDRETH
- Clarified repayment of this contract has been completed. - Noted this refers to other lights at Lillian Park; they are looking to upgrade to solar.

COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS
- Asked if the list includes all of the needs at the parks. - Expressed concerns with the state of our bathrooms in our local parks, as nothing is more important for our community.
- Asked for the status on the insurance claim at Foglesong Park, where they stole the lights.

FINANCE DIRECTOR SYDNIE HARRIS
- Clarified that this list includes all of the current needs in our parks.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHRIS HELDRETH
- Clarified that these are the needs they believe can enhance our local parks. - Mentioned the recent restroom upgrades in our local parks and what needs to be done. - Talked about doing some swing shifts to clean up restrooms at night to improve services.

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON
- Explained that this is an estimated cost that staff already had access to. - Noted they are working on a full, robust, comprehensive 5 and 10-year capital improvement program; this is just an overview.

PUBLIC WORKS SUPERINTENDENT TOMMY ALVA
- Spoke on the marquee sign at Jasper Park.
- Explained that all insurance claims go back to the General Fund; it does not go back to the department.

COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ
- Asked for the status on the purchase of equipment for concrete.

9.a
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: 05 14 2025 WORKSHOP MINUTES FINAL AF (6035 : Minutes of the Workshop May 14, 2025 5:30 PM) Minutes-May 14, 2025

Page 3 of 7 ends

MAYOR SILVA
- Spoke on the improvements made to Foglesong Park.

Motion made by MAYOR SILVA, seconded by COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS, to suspend the rules and allow for public comments after each goal session. Passed Unanimously 3 - 0.

SPEAKERS

MIKE HERNANDEZ, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Asked how money from CDBG gets allocated
- Mentioned transients are staying in the park's restrooms overnight.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHRIS HELDRETH
- Explained that there are $220,000.00 for a CDBG project for the next fiscal year for Lillian Park parking improvement.
- Noted, these funds can be reallocated for other projects if the council desires.

COMMUNITY CENTERS PRESENTATION

QUESTIONS

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON
- Clarified Measure Q Funds will close the gap of $897,000.00 for the HVAC project at Cora Harper Fitness Center.

FINANCE DIRECTOR SYDNIE HARRIS
- Explained there is a line item for the kitchen remodel at Cora Harper Fitness Center and another one for the Senior Center.

COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS
- Asked why the kitchen at Cora Harper Fitness Center is being remodeled. - Asked what will be done with the $25,000.
- Asked if individuals' AC units can be put in Cora.
- Commended staff for the saunas recently completed.
- Asked why all the numbers are flat.

PUBLIC WORKS SUPERINTENDENT TOMMY ALVA
- Explained events are hosted at the Cora Harper Fitness Center, and there is a need for the kitchen to be in operation.
- Mentioned they will be redoing the cabinets, the flooring, etc.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHRIS HELDRETH
- Explained that the system was designed for that, there are individual units, just much larger than regular units seen at homes.

MAYOR SILVA
- Asked if the sign for the Jeff L. Eason Sr. Senior Center had been budgeted.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHRIS HELDRETH
- Mentioned they are working on the design, and quotes for the sign, and it will be budgeted next fiscal year.
- Noted, these are estimated numbers.

COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ
- Noted, she is glad to see all of these items have been addressed. - Mentioned that some assistance can be requested from the county.

9.a
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: 05 14 2025 WORKSHOP MINUTES FINAL AF (6035 : Minutes of the Workshop May 14, 2025 5:30 PM) Minutes-May 14, 2025

Page 4 of 7 ends

SPEAKERS

NO SPEAKERS

STREETS, ROADS, AND BRIDGES PRESENTATION

COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS
- Expressed concerns with the state of local streets, glad to see there is a plan in place. - Asked for clarification on the Rimrock Project.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHRIS HELDRETH
- Clarified there are two projects on Rimrock Rd, one is with the County and the other with Caltrans, and gave specifics.
- Mentioned that these projects will cost about 1 million dollars.

COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ
- Happy to see some progress with the street improvements.

MAYOR SILVA
- Asked where the funding is coming from for these projects. - Asked if there is an engineer's estimate available.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHRIS HELDRETH
- Noted that their funding is coming from different places, like Measure I. - Mentioned that there is no engineer's estimate yet.

SPEAKERS

MIKE HERNANDEZ, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Asked if funding has been allocated for the Barstow Rd. lights, and if these funds can be used for something else.
- Asked what the 1.7 million deed to Measure I was for.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHRIS HELDRETH
- Clarified Caltrans will handle the street lights project, and they stated they will not need the city's money; they already have the budget for this project.
- Noted he is not aware of the reason for the Measure I deed.

INFRASTRUCTURE PRESENTATION

COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ
- Asked if this included BNSF expansion or just current city needs.

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON
- Clarified this is to plan for the future, and the BNSF expansion has been included. - Mentioned this is a projection for grant finding and to secure grant funding.

COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS
- Asked for more clarification regarding the Police Department 911 capture line item and the phone system upgrade.

INTERIM POLICE CHIEF DANIEL ARTHUR
- Clarified that this refers to the updating of the recording system for the 911 calls to keep track of every call.
- Noted the phone system upgrade refers to the whole system - Police, Fire, and City Hall.

9.a
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: 05 14 2025 WORKSHOP MINUTES FINAL AF (6035 : Minutes of the Workshop May 14, 2025 5:30 PM) Minutes-May 14, 2025

Page 5 of 7 ends

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHRIS HELDRETH
- Mentioned that this phone system was acquired in 2008, and is up for an upgrade.

COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS
- Stated he wanted to make sure Fire and Police had all the tools necessary to continue to keep residents of Barstow safe.

MAYOR SILVA
- Asked for further clarification on the WWTP needs.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHRIS HELDRETH
- Explained that the WWTP is a 50% capacity; noted that the State Law states that when a treatment plant goes over 50% capacity, they need to start planning for expansion. - Mentioned they would like to see a plugin and play type plan soon. - Noted, currently, some needs and repairs need to be done as soon as possible.

COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ
- Asked to consider the new technology for WWTP improvements.

SPEAKERS

MIKE HERNANDEZ, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Asked if BIG will match any grant funds acquired by the city. - Would like to see some type of support from BIG to upgrade the WWTP.

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON
- Explained some of the opportunities for funding for the WWTP.

PUBLIC SAFETY PRESENTATION (POLICE DEPARTMENT)

COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS
- Asked the reason why and how many pistols are being replaced. - Asked what is left to remodel at the Police Department.

INTERIM POLICE CHIEF DANIEL ARTHUR
- Explained that there are faulty issues with the current weapons they have, and they need to be replaced for public safety.
- Noted current weapons would be sold to recoup some of the money invested in them. - Mentioned men's locker room needs to be expanded.
- Explained the need for cameras in problematic areas around town.

COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ
- Asked for clarification on the mobile command post.

INTERIM POLICE CHIEF DANIEL ARTHUR
- Explained that this will be for large-scale incidents like shootings or natural disasters. - Noted for now, these incidents are conducted in the back of a patrol car with no privacy. - Mentioned the Police Department has a tactical armor vehicle, which is a great asset, but this is not practical for the urban police needs.
- Noted this vehicle cannot be sold; it has to be given back to the military.

MAYOR SILVA
- Asked how the city can legally disclose that they employed plate readers and cameras to try to deter out-of-town people trying to do mad business at the outlet mall.

9.a
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: 05 14 2025 WORKSHOP MINUTES FINAL AF (6035 : Minutes of the Workshop May 14, 2025 5:30 PM) Minutes-May 14, 2025

Page 6 of 7 ends

CITY ATTORNEY ANDREW JARED
- Explained one of the ways is signs advising people on the plate readers and cameras at the edge of the city.

SPEAKERS

MIKE HERNANDEZ, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Spoke of an incident where they stole a vehicle from his driveway, and because of cameras, they were able to recover the vehicle within three hours.

PUBLIC SAFETY PRESENTATION (FIRE DEPARTMENT)

COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS
- Glad to see some of the Fire Department's needs are being met.

COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ
- Spoke on the need for a ladder engine in Barstow.
- Asked how many more staff will be needed for this engine.

FIRE CHIEF CORY CISNEROS
- Spoke on the new apparatus recently purchased and the savings they had by purchasing used. - Explained the need for a ladder engine, mentioning that this truck can reach up to 50 feet above ground.
- Noted currently they only have a 24-foot extension ladder. - Spoke about grant opportunities that might be available to the Fire Department.

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON
- Spoke on development impact fees for safety needs, noting that it needs to be incorporated in the fee study.

MAYOR SILVA
- Asked for clarification on the remodel of Fire Station 361.

FIRE CHIEF CORY CISNEROS
- Explained Station 361 is in immediate need of a new roof, nothing this is a number one priority, and explained other needs for building improvement at Fire Station 361.

MAYOR SILVA
- Requested that the council be educated regarding their role during an emergency (EOC) and where they are supposed to meet during the emergency.

SPEAKERS

MIKE HERNANDEZ, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Asked if a fee can be put on buildings over three stories to help pay for the ladder truck.

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON
- Noted she will research this information.

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT NEEDS PRESENTATION

COUNCIL MEMBER WILLIAMS
- Commanded the staff for the presentation.

COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ
- Noted this was a great informative presentation and thanked staff for the great job.

9.a
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: 05 14 2025 WORKSHOP MINUTES FINAL AF (6035 : Minutes of the Workshop May 14, 2025 5:30 PM) Minutes-May 14, 2025

Page 7 of 7 ends

MAYOR SILVA
- Also noted this was a great presentation, requested council study this and prepare for the budget presentation.

SPEAKERS

MIKE HERNANDEZ, BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA
- Mentioned he was pleasantly surprised to see section 7 listed for improvements on the presentation.

CITY MANAGER ROCHELLE CLAYTON
- Thanked staff for the presentation, noted the budget presentation will be on Wednesday, May 21st. at 6:00 P.M.

RESULT: PRESENTATION ONLY
ADJOURNMENT:

By the consensus of the City Council and without objection, the meeting was adjourned at 7:32 PM.

9.a
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: 05 14 2025 WORKSHOP MINUTES FINAL AF (6035 : Minutes of the Workshop May 14, 2025 5:30 PM) Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30 PM
Barstow Fire Protection District
Cory Cisneros
Resolution
Doc ID: 6012

COUNCIL RESOLUTION
AGENDA MATTER:

SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE 1031-2025 OF THE CITY OF BARSTOW ADOPTING OF FIRE

HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES IN THE LOCAL RESPONSIBILITY AREAS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The Barstow Fire Protection District is being mandated to adopt a Fire Hazard Severity Zone within its Local Responsibility Area in support of the State Fire Marshal’s recommendation. This recommendation deems the Community in the lowest rating due to the criteria set forth by the State Fire Marshal.

On June 3, 2025, the City Council introduced the ordinance, received public comment on the matter, and considered the administrative report. This ordinance is now before the City Council for adoption.

DISCUSSION:

The State Fire Marshal identified areas in the state as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones based on consistent statewide criteria and based on the severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas. Moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones shall be based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, and other relevant factors including areas where winds have been identified by the Office of the State Fire Marshal as a major cause of wildfire spread. The Barstow Fire Protection District has been identified as meeting the state minimum of a “Moderate” fire hazard severity zone.

Fire Hazard Severity Zone Designation
In September 2021, Senate Bill 63 was signed by Governor Newsom. Senate Bill 63 included an act to amend California Government Code Section 51178. The amendment was effective on January 1, 2022, and directed the State Fire Marshal to identify areas in the state as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones (FHSZ) based on consistent statewide criteria and the severity of the fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas. In addition, moderate, high, and very high FHSZs are based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, and other relevant factors that have been identified by the Office of the State Fire Marshal as a major cause of wildfire spread.

In September 2022, Assembly Bill 211 was signed by Governor Newsom. Assembly Bill 211 amended California Government Code Section 51179 and requires local agencies to designate, by ordinance, moderate, high, and very high FHSZs within 120 days of receiving recommendations from the State Fire Marshal pursuant to Section 51178. Further, section 51179, subdivision (b) prohibits local agencies from lowering the recommended designation of the State Fire Marshal, though local agencies have discretion to increase the designation.

In February 2025, the Office of the State Fire Marshal released the FHSZs in Local Responsibility Area map for review. The map is attached to this staff report and identifies moderate, high, and very high FHSZs within the City of Barstow. Staff reviewed the CALFIRE map and recommends adopting it without modification.

Environmental Review
City staff have evaluated the proposed Ordinance and determined that it is exempt from the California 10 Packet Pg. 44
Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30 PM
Barstow Fire Protection District
Cory Cisneros
Resolution
Doc ID: 6012

COUNCIL RESOLUTION
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3), 15303, and 15308 on the grounds that it can be seen with certainty that the Ordinance will not have a significant effect on the environment. To the extent this is a project under CEQA, it is categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land), 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations), 15307 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of Natural Resources), and 15308 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment).

Attachment 1 - Draft Ordinance with Fire Hazard Severity Zones FISCAL IMPACT:

None
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 1031-2025 regarding adoption of a fire hazard severity zones in Local Responsibility Area.
10 Packet Pg. 45
ATTACHMENT 1

DRAFT ORDINANCE ADOPTING

THE FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONE

DESIGNATIONS

RECOMMENDED BY

THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL

10.a
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Local Responsibility Area - 2nd reading(400092.3) (6012 : Second Reading and Adoption of an ORDINANCE NO. 1031-2025

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BARSTOW

ADOPTING THE FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONE DESIGNATIONS

RECOMMENDED BY THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 51179
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code section 51178, the State Fire Marshal published a fire map indicating the Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zones for the City of Barstow and designating various areas in the City of Barstow as moderate, high and very high fire hazard severity zones (“FHSZ”); and WHEREAS, Government Code section 51179 requires the City to designate moderate, high, and very high FHSZ within 120 days of receiving the recommendations of the State Fire Marshal; and
WHEREAS, Government Code section 51179, subdivision (b) permits the City to increase the FHSZ recommendations of the State Fire Marshal but prohibits the City from decreasing the State Fire Marshal’s recommendations.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Barstow does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. Adoption of Fire Maps. The City Council hereby adopts the fire hazard severity zones as recommended by the State Fire Marshal, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and fully incorporated herein by this reference, pursuant to Government Code section 51179.

The maps, approved by the City of Barstow, are hereby incorporated by reference and entitled “City of Barstow Fire Hazard Severity Zones.” The official maps are also located electronically on the Fire Department’s website:
https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/6a9cb66bb1824cd98756812af41292a0 SECTION 2. Severability. If any provision, section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or word of this Ordinance, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is rendered or declared invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions, sections, subsections paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or words of this Ordinance, and their application to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby and shall remain in full force and effect and, to that end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable.

SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after adoption as provided by Government Code 36937. The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be published in accordance with California Government Code Section 36933.

SECTION 4. Inconsistencies. Any provision of the City’s Municipal Code or appendices thereto that are inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent of such 400090.1

10.a
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Local Responsibility Area - 2nd reading(400092.3) (6012 : Second Reading and Adoption of an 400090.1
inconsistencies and no further, is hereby modified to the extent necessary to effect the provisions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 5. CEQA. The City staff have evaluated the proposed Ordinance and determined that it is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3), 15303, and 15308 on the grounds that it can be seen with certainty that the Ordinance will not have a significant effect on the environment. To the extent this is a project under CEQA, it is categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land), 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations), 15307 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of Natural Resources), and 15308 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment).

SECTION 6. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause this Ordinance and her certification, together with proof of publication, to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of the City Council.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ____ day of _________________, 20____. ________________________________
Timothy Silva, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Andrea Flores, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________
Matthew Summers, City Attorney

10.a
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Local Responsibility Area - 2nd reading(400092.3) (6012 : Second Reading and Adoption of an 400090.1
I, Andrea Flores, City Clerk for the City of Barstow, California, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Ordinance No. ___-2025, which was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Barstow held on the ___ day of __________________, 20____, and adopted at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Barstow on the ____ day of ___________20____, by the following vote:

AIES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
________________________________
Andrea Flores, City Clerk

10.a
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Local Responsibility Area - 2nd reading(400092.3) (6012 : Second Reading and Adoption of an City and County boundaries as of 10/22/24 (CA Board of Equalization) CAL FIRE State Responsibility Areas (SRA25_1)
CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZSRA23_3, FHSZLRA_25_1) Data Sources:

Daniel Berlant, State Fire Marshal, CA Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Joe Tyler, Director/Fire Chief, CA Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Wade Crowfoot, Secretary for Natural Resources, CA Natural Resources Agency The State of California and the Department of Forestry and Fire Gavin Newsom, Governor, State of California Protection make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy of data or maps. Neither the State nor the Department shall be liable under any circumstances for any direct, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to any claim by any user or third party on account of, or arising from, the use of data or maps. and other relevant factors including areas where winds
have been identified by the Office of the State Fire Marshal as a major cause of wildfire spread.
statewide criteria and based on the severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas. Moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones shall be based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, Government Code section 51178 requires the State Fire
Marshal to identify areas in the state as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones based on consistent Waterbody
Federal Responsibility
Area (FRA)
Unzoned LRA
Incorporated City
Projection: NAD 83 California Teale Albers
Scale: 1:94,000 at 11" x 17"
Km 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Mi 0 1 2 3 4
High Moderate
Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) in Local Responsibility Area (LRA), as Identified by the State Fire Marshal
Barstow
40 15
66 247
58 15

UNINCORPORATED SAN
BERNARDINO CO.

March 24, 2025
As Identified by the
State Fire Marshal
Local Responsibility Area
Fire Hazard Severity Zones
CITY OF BARSTOW – SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

10.a
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Local Responsibility Area - 2nd reading(400092.3) (6012 : Second Reading and Adoption of an Ordinance Adopting of Fire Hazard Severity Zones) Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30 PM
Engineering
Fidel Martinez
Resolution
Doc ID: 6023

COUNCIL RESOLUTION
AGENDA MATTER:

RESOLUTION NO. _____-2025 TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS TO REAFFIRM THE LEVY AND

In accordance with Section 22566 of the Streets and Highways Code, the City must annually reaffirm the active assessment districts located within Barstow. To comply with this requirement, staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No. _____-2025 directing the City to present the updated Assessment District Engineer's Report for consideration at a public hearing to be held on Tuesday, July 15, 2025.

DISCUSSION:

In 1988, the City of Barstow approved the formation of the Street Lighting and Flood Control Maintenance District #1 for all new subdivisions, and in 1990, approved the formation of the Landscaping and Street Maintenance District #1.

Annual maintenance and operation costs associated with street maintenance, drainage, street lighting, and landscaping are assessed on a pro-rata basis to each of the properties within the Maintenance District and are included on the annual property tax statement. The Engineer’s Report indicates all existing assessments to be levied within Maintenance District #1. As a result of Proposition 218, assessments may not be increased without a vote of the property owners.

In order to remain active and in accordance with Section 22566 of the Streets and Highways Code, a report shall be prepared for each fiscal year for which assessments are to be levied and collected and the City Council is required to annually reaffirm the assessment districts.

As part of the reaffirmation process, the City Engineer is also required to present the updated Assessment District Engineer’s Report. By approving the attached resolution, the City Council would be directing the preparation of the Assessment District Engineer’s Report and setting the date, time, and location of a public hearing to consider the Assessment District Engineer’s Report. The public hearing is requested to be held by the City Council on Tuesday, July 15, 2025, at 7:00 p.m. at 220 E. Mountain View Street, Barstow, CA 92311.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Approve Resolution No. _____-2025
11 Packet Pg. 51
Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30 PM
Engineering
Fidel Martinez
Resolution
Doc ID: 6023

COUNCIL RESOLUTION
 Initiate proceedings to reaffirm the levy and collection of annual property tax roll assessments for Fiscal Year 2025/2026
 Order the Consulting City Engineer to prepare an Engineer’s Report for Landscaping Assessment District #1, Street Maintenance Assessment District #1, Street Lighting Assessment District #1, and Flood Control Assessment District #1.  Set the date, time, and location of the public hearing for the reaffirmation of the annual property tax roll assessments for Tuesday, July 15, 2025, at 7:00 p.m. at 220 E. Mountain View St., Barstow, CA 92311.
 Direct the City Clerk to publish a Notice of Public Hearing in a local newspaper of general circulation.

2. Waive the full reading.
11 Packet Pg. 52
Resolution No. XXXX-2025
RESOLUTION NO. _____-2025

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BARSTOW

DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF

ASSESSMENTS UPON CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY
WITHIN FLOOD CONTROL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1,
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, STREET
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Barstow wishes to provide continued financing for necessary maintenance of certain public improvements within the Street Lighting, Flood Control, Landscaping, and Street Maintenance Districts # 1 through a levy of benefit assessments for the fiscal year 2025-2026 under the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Streets and Highway Code Section 22500 et seq.) and the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 (Government Code Section 54703 et seq.), and WHEREAS, the City Council therefore proposes to levy benefit assessments pursuant to the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 Act and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, to insure continued financing of the necessary maintenance of certain Street Lighting, Flood Control and Drainage Improvements, Landscaping, and Street Improvements.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BARSTOW HEREBY FINDS DETERMINES, ORDERS AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the public interest, convenience and necessity require the continued maintenance and operation of the public street, street lighting, sidewalks, flood control, landscape and drainage improvements for the direct benefit of the properties within the Districts.

2. The area of benefit shall be all lands in the City of Barstow within the boundaries shown on the maps of Street Lighting, Flood Control, Landscaping and Street Maintenance District #1, as are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Barstow.

3. That the proposed improvements with respect to each of the Districts may be briefly described as follows:

With respect to the Street Maintenance District: the operation and maintenance of public streets and sidewalks within said district, including sweeping, striping, signing, crack filling, and other pavement maintenance;
With respect to the Landscape Maintenance District: the maintenance and

11.a
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Reso XXX-2025 Initiate Annual Tax Roll Assessments_Set Public Hearing_CC Meeting 06.17.25 (6023 : Resolution Initiation of Resolution No. XXXX-2025
servicing of landscaping located in public roadways, streets, and right-ofway within said district; With respect to the Flood Control Maintenance District: the operation and maintenance of drainage and flood control system in connection with said district, including open channels, storm drains, inlets and debris basins.

With respect to the Street Lighting District: the operation of street lighting in connection with said district including the public roadways, streets, and right-of- way within said district.

4. That the Consulting City Engineer as the “Engineer of Work” is hereby ordered to have the Engineer’s Report prepared for the fiscal year 2025-2026 in accordance with the law.

5. That the date, time, and place for the hearing by the City Council on the Engineer’s Report and the determination of the proposed assessments is hereby set for Tuesday, July 15, 2025, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers located at 220 East Mountain View Street, Barstow, California.

6. The City Clerk is hereby directed to publish notice of the public hearing in a local newspaper of general circulation within the area of benefit.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of June, 2025.

Timothy R. Silva,
Mayor
ATTEST:

Andrea Flores
City Clerk

11.a
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Reso XXX-2025 Initiate Annual Tax Roll Assessments_Set Public Hearing_CC Meeting 06.17.25 (6023 : Resolution Initiation of Resolution No. XXXX-2025
I, Andrea Flores, City Clerk of the City of Barstow, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. _____-2025 is the actual Resolution duly and regularly adopted by the City Council at its regular meeting on the 17th day of June 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT/VACANT:

ABSTAIN:

Andrea Flores
City Clerk

11.a
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Reso XXX-2025 Initiate Annual Tax Roll Assessments_Set Public Hearing_CC Meeting 06.17.25 (6023 : Resolution Initiation of Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30 PM
City Clerk / Records
Maria Chavez
Community Promotion
Doc ID: 6029

AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA MATTER:

THE UNITED STATES VETERANS SUPPORT GROUP INC., A NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION, HAS SUBMITTED A COMMUNITY PROMOTIONAL FUND (MEASURE Q) APPLICATION REQUESTING INKIND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE CITY IN THE AMOUNT OF $400 TO HELP OFFSET

FACILITY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH HOSTING ITS ANNUAL KIDS FUN DAY EVENT ON SATURDAY, JULY 19, 2025, AT DANA PARK.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The United States Veterans Support Group Inc., a non profit orginazation, is requesting in-kind financial assistance from the City in the amount of $400 to help offset the facility costs associated with hosting its Annual Kids Fun Day Event on Saturday, July 19, 2025, at Dana Park.

DISCUSSION:

On Saturday, July 19, 2025, the United States Veterans Support Group Inc. will once again host its Annual Kids Fun Day Event at Dana Park. This event has become a valued community celebration that supports residents through a variety of services, including access to food, clothing, family games, and other essential resources that enhance quality of life.

To support this effort, the organization is requesting an in-kind donation from the City in the amount of $400 to help offset facility use costs at Dana Park. Approval of this request would reflect the City’s ongoing commitment to supporting community-based events that foster inclusivity, family engagement, and neighborhood resilience.

Attached for Council consideration is the organization’s completed Community Promotional Fund Application outlining the event and associated costs.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Approval of this request would result in an in-kind contribution valued at $400 to be charged to the Measure Q Community Promotional Fund Account No. 102.150.542.07.755.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

12.a
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: United States Veterans Support Group APP (6029 : Community Promotional Fund Application from the United States Veteran

12.a
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: United States Veterans Support Group APP (6029 : Community Promotional Fund Application from the United States Veteran

12.a
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: United States Veterans Support Group APP (6029 : Community Promotional Fund Application from the United States Veteran

12.a
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: United States Veterans Support Group APP (6029 : Community Promotional Fund Application from the United States Veteran

12.a
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: United States Veterans Support Group APP (6029 : Community Promotional Fund Application from the United States Veteran

12.a
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: United States Veterans Support Group APP (6029 : Community Promotional Fund Application from the United States Veteran Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30 PM
City Clerk / Records
Maria Chavez
Community Promotion
Doc ID: 6034

AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA MATTER:

HD FAMILY EVENTS HAS SUBMITTED A COMMUNITY PROMOTIONAL FUND APPLICATION (MEASURE Q) REQUESTING IN-KIND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE IN THE AMOUNT OF $350.10 TO

HELP OFFSET PERMITTING AND WATER USE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH HOSTING ITS SUMMER MARKETS IN BARSTOW, SCHEDULED FOR SUNDAY, JULY 6, 2025, AND SUNDAY, AUGUST 10, 2025, AT FOGLESONG PARK.

WHILE HD FAMILY EVENTS IS NOT CURRENTLY
RECOGNIZED AS A 501(C)(3) NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION, THEY HAVE SUBMITTED THEIR IRS APPLICATION AND ARE AWAITING FORMAL APPROVAL. THE APPLICANT INDICATES THAT THE

EVENT WILL PROVIDE A COMMUNITY BENEFIT BY SUPPORTING LOCAL VENDORS AND OFFERING A FREE, FAMILY-FRIENDLY PUBLIC EVENT.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

HD Family Events is requesting in-kind financial assistance from the City of Barstow in the amount of $350.10 to help offset permitting and water costs associated with hosting its Summer Markets in Barstow event on Sunday, July 6, 2025, and Sunday, August 10, 2025, at Foglesong Park. While HD Family Events is not currently a registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, they have submitted their application and are awaiting IRS approval.

DISCUSSION:

HD Family Events is requesting an in-kind donation from the City in the amount of $350.10 to help offset permitting and water fees associated with hosting two Summer Markets events on Sunday, July 6, 2025, and Sunday, August 10, 2025, at Foglesong Park.

These family-friendly events are open to the public and will feature food vendors, music, face painting, games, and other engaging activities. The goal of the event is to create a welcoming space that promotes community engagement, inclusivity, and neighborhood connection.

To support the event, the organization is requesting the following fee waivers:
 Temporary Use Permit Fee: $275.10
 Water Fee: $75.00
Total In-Kind Request = $350.10
While HD Family Events is not currently a registered 501(c)(3) organization, they have submitted an application and are awaiting IRS approval. A completed Community Promotional Fund Application has 13 Packet Pg. 63
Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30 PM
City Clerk / Records
Maria Chavez
Community Promotion
Doc ID: 6034

AGENDA ITEM
been submitted and is attached for Council’s review.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Approval of this request would result in an in-kind contribution valued at $350.10 to be charged to the Measure Q Community Promotional Fund Account No. 102.150.542.07.755.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve an in-kind donation valued at $350.10 to the HD Family Events to assist with Temporary Use Permit and Water fees for the Summer Markets in Barstow Event on Sunday, July 6, 2025, and Sunday, August 10, 2025.
13 Packet Pg. 64
Community Promotional Fund Application
Rev. August 2021 Community Promotional Fund Application Page 1 APPLICANT INFORMATION:

Name of applicant: ____________________________________________________ Name of organization or group represented: ________________________________ Mailing address: ______________________________________________________ Contact phone number(s):
_________________________________
Email Address:
_________________________________
Non-Profit? Yes No If no, are you partnering with a non-profit:___________ PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

Name of Event: _______________________________________________________ Amount requested: $________________
What will the funds be used for and/or what are the waiver of fees for? ___________ ____________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ When will the activity take place? ________________________________________ Where will the activity take place? ________________________________________ Why are the funds/waiver of fees/in-kind services needed? ____________________ ____________________________________________________________________ How many Barstow area residents are involved with this organization? ___________ How many spectators will watch this activity? _______________________________ Please describe how this activity will benefit Barstow. If additional space is necessary, please attach additional sheets:
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________

13.a
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: HD Family Events APP Redacted (6034 : Community Promotional Fund Application from the HD Family Events) Community Promotional Fund Application
Rev. August 2021 Community Promotional Fund Application Page 2 With this application, please attach the following:

1. A detailed budget stating the total cost of the activity or event, all sources and amounts of funding, and all expenses;

2. A description of the organization’s or group’s purpose or objective.

3. A copy of the organization’s non-profit determination.

By signing below, I declare that I have read the City’s Community Promotional Fund Policy and agree to all its terms and conditions. I agree that there is a formal process in place to conduct background checks on all employees and volunteers who work with persons under the age of 18 years and senior citizens.

I understand that an incomplete application will not be accepted and that the organization or applicant will not be considered for funding. (If the application is being submitted on behalf of an organization or school, an additional signature is required.)
_______________________________ ________________________________ Signature of Applicant Applicant Name (printed) & Date
_______________________________
School Principal or Organization
President/Director Signature
(if applicable)

13.a
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: HD Family Events APP Redacted (6034 : Community Promotional Fund Application from the HD Family Events)

1.A detailed budget stating the total cost of the activity or event, all sources and amounts of funding, and all expenses

2.A description of the organization’s or group’s purpose or objective HD Family Events empowers local entrepreneurs and enriches communities by helping vendors navigate permitting processes and by organizing inclusive, vibrant pop-up markets and events where residents can connect, shop, and support local businesses.Through organizing family events and pop-ups, the organization creates accessible opportunities for local vendors to participate in the marketplace, fosters connections among community members, and contributes to the economic and social well-being of the area.

3.3. A copy of the organization’s non-profit determination.

We applied for our 501(c)(3) and we are waiting for a response. Our Employer ID Number 33-2698617

13.b
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: HD Family Events Letter (6034 : Community Promotional Fund Application from the HD Family Events) Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30 PM
City Manager Department
Matthew Summers
Resolution
Doc ID: 6024

COUNCIL RESOLUTION
AGENDA MATTER:

ADOPT RESOLUTION XX-2025 TO REPEAL AND REPLACE RESOLUTION NO. 5010-2020

REGARDING VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR ANALYZING

TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT TO

CORRECT CLERICAL ERROR
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. XX-2025 to repeal and replace Resolution No. 5010-2020
in order to correct a clerical error in the Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) threshold language. This correction ensures consistency with the County’s adopted thresholds and the original intent of Resolution No. 5010- 2020.

DISCUSSION:

Background
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires public agencies to evaluate and, where feasible, avoid or reduce significant environmental effects before approving projects. In December 2018, the Office of Administrative Law adopted a comprehensive update to the CEQA Guidelines, which included the shift from using Level of Service (LOS) to Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as the primary metric for evaluating transportation impacts.

As part of this statewide transition, all cities were required to adopt VMT thresholds no later than July 1, 2020. To support this effort, the City of Barstow collaborated with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) and retained Fehr & Peers, a leading transportation planning firm, to develop City-specific thresholds aligned with state law and regional methodologies. Multiple workshops were conducted to guide this development, and a joint Planning Commission-City Council public process culminated in the adoption of Resolution No. 5010-2020 on November 2, 2020.

These VMT thresholds were incorporated into the City’s Local CEQA Guidelines, replacing LOS for determining the significance of transportation-related impacts under CEQA. However, use of LOS may still apply in other contexts such as Congestion Management Plans.

Proposed Changes
Following the adoption of the VMT thresholds, staff has identified a typographical omission in the adopted language under the Cumulative Threshold. The phrase “per service population” was omitted from the cumulative and project thresholds, which is essential for correctly applying VMT analysis under CEQA and the adopted SBCTA Thresholds.

Current (incorrect) language:
“A significant impact would occur if the project caused total daily VMT within the City to be higher than the no project alternative under cumulative conditions.” 14 Packet Pg. 68
Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30 PM
City Manager Department
Matthew Summers
Resolution
Doc ID: 6024

COUNCIL RESOLUTION
Proposed correction (with underlined addition):
“A significant impact would occur if the project caused total daily VMT per service population within the City to be higher than the no project alternative under cumulative conditions.” These corrections, which occur in both the land use plans and land use projects sections of the thresholds, ensures consistency with the County-adopted thresholds and the City’s intended methodology. The correct metric evaluates VMT per service population (i.e., residents plus employees), not just total VMT, for proposed new development and land use projects. Without this correction, any project that adds vehicle trips-such as a greenfield development or a project on land that has never been developed before-could incorrectly be interpreted as creating a significant environmental impact, even when the increase in VMT is proportionate to population growth an the project’s net effect is to reduce vehicles miles travelled per person by building jobs near residences.

The revised language ensures that significance is only triggered when a project results in a net increase in VMT per service population-which might occur if a project generates excessive commute distances or pulls in non-local traffic, such as a commuter-heavy development.

This amendment does not change policy, thresholds, or methodologies, but simply corrects the wording to reflect what was already intended, consistent with the County and SBCTA standards. The County language cited in the original resolution includes “per service population” for projects, confirming this as a clerical error.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Amending and restating the resolution to correct a clerical error in a City policy does not constitute a project under CEQA, as it involves general policy clarifications and does not result in a direct physical change to the environment. This administrative action is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15378(b)(5).

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Attachment 1 - Proposed Resolution No XX- 2025 Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020 Attachment 2 - Redline of Exhibit A to Resolution No. 5010-2020 Attachment 3 - Original Resolution No. 5010-2020
14 Packet Pg. 69
ATTACHMENT 1
Draft Resolution Repealing and
Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020
Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) 400205.2
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. ____-2025

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BARSTOW, ADOPTING “VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED”

THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR PURPOSES OF

ANALYZING TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS UNDER THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA Guidelines") encourage public agencies to develop and publish generally applicable "thresholds of significance" to be used in determining the significance of a project's environmental effects; and
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7(a) defines a threshold of significance as "an identifiable quantitative, qualitative or performance level of a particular environmental effect, noncompliance with which means the effect will normally be determined to be significant by the agency and compliance with which means the effect normally will be determined to be less than significant"; and WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7(b) requires that thresholds of significance must be adopted by ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulations, developed through a public review process, and be supported by substantial evidence; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7(c), when adopting thresholds of significance, a public agency may consider thresholds of significance adopted or recommended by other public agencies provided that the decision of the agency is supported by substantial evidence; and
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 743, enacted in 2013 and codified in Public Resources Code section 21099, required changes to the CEQA Guidelines regarding the criteria for determining the significance of transportation impacts of projects; and WHEREAS, in 2018, the Governor's Office of Planning and Research ("OPR") proposed, and the California Natural Resources Agency certified and adopted, new CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3 that identifies vehicle miles traveled ("VMT") - meaning the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a project - as the most appropriate metric to evaluate a project's transportation impacts; and WHEREAS, as a result, automobile delay, as measured by "level of service" ("LOS"} and other similar metrics, will generally no longer constitute a significant environmental effect under CEQA; and
WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3 requires agencies to stop treating automobile delay/LOS as an environmental impact effective on July 1, 2020, though public agencies may elect to be governed by this section immediately; and Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) 400205.2 2
WHEREAS, the City of Barstow, following a public review process consisting of staff presentations before the Planning Commission on October 12, 2020, adopted the VMT thresholds of significance for determining the significance of transportation impacts that are recommended in an analysis conducted by the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority on behalf of its member jurisdictions on November 2, 2020; and WHEREAS, following the adoption of the VMT thresholds, staff has identified a clerical error in the adopted language under the Cumulative Threshold related to “per service population” in Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the change proposed would be to add the underlined text: “A significant impact would occur if the project caused total daily VMT per service population within the City to be higher than the no project alternative under cumulative conditions”; WHEREAS, this change does not alter the original policy, but ensures the County’s correctly worded policy is properly cited in the City of Barstow’s policy. Amending and restating the resolution to correct a clerical error in a City policy does not constitute a project under CEQA, as it involves general policy clarifications and does not result in a direct physical change to the environment. This administrative action is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15378(b)(5).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Barstow as follows:

Section 1. The City of Barstow hereby adopts the following:

1. Utilizing the San Bernardino County Travel Demand Model (SBTAM) as its preferred methodology to measure VMT.

2. Utilizing the San Bernardino County Travel Demand Model (SBTAM) as its preferred method to analyze a project's VMT impact.

3. Utilizing a threshold consistent with Table 1 in Exhibit A.

Section 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution.

Section 3. Resolution No. 5010-2020 shall be repealed and replaced by this resolution.

Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) 400205.2 3
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ________ day of __________, 2025. ___________________________
Tim R. Silva, Mayor
________________________
Andrea Flores, City Clerk
Approved as to Form
________________________
Matthew Summers, City Attorney
ATTEST:

I, Andrea Flores, City Clerk of the City of Barstow and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. ____-2025, was adopted by said City Council at a regular meeting held on the ____________ by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________
Andrea Flores, City Clerk
Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) 400205.2 4
Exhibit A
Table 1
VMT Impact Thresholds
Methods Project Threshold Cumulative Threshold
Land Use Plans (such as General Plans and Specific Plans) • San Bernardino Traffic
Analysis Model (SBTAM)
forecast of total daily VMT/SP
• To capture project effect,
the same cumulative year
population and
employment growth totals
should be used. The
“project” only influences
land use allocation.

A significant impact would occur if
the project VMT/SP (for the land
use plan) exceeds the
[Countywide/Citywide] average
under General Plan Buildout
Conditions.

A significant impact would occur if
the project caused total daily VMT
per service population within the
City to be higher than the no
project alternative under
cumulative conditions.
• Consistency check with

SCAG RTP/SCS
• Is the proposed project
within the growth
projections in the
RTP/SCS?
N/A A significant impact would occur if
the project is determined to be
inconsistent with the RTP/SCS.

Land Use Projects
• Transit Priority Area (TPA)
screening
Presumed less than significant
VMT impact for projects located in
TPAs
Project presumption applies under
cumulative conditions as long as
project is consistent with SCAG
RTP/SCS.
• Low VMT area screening Presumed less than significant VMT impact for projects located in
low VMT generating model traffic
analysis zones (TAZs). These
TAZs generate total daily VMT/SP
that is 15% less than the baseline
level for the County
Project presumption applies under
cumulative conditions as long as
the project is consistent with
SCAG RTP/SCS.
• Project type screening Local serving retail projects (Per OPR’s Technical Advisory less
than 50,000 square feet) and
neighborhood schools are
presumed to have a less than
significant VMT impact. Projects
that generate less than 110 daily
trips do not require VMT analysis.

Project presumption applies under
cumulative conditions as long as
project is consistent with SCAG
RTP/SCS.
• VMT analysis using SBTAM
forecast of total daily VMT/SP.

A significant impact would occur if
the project VMT/SP exceeds the
[Countywide/Citywide] average
under General Plan Buildout
Conditions.

A significant impact would occur if
the project is determined to be
inconsistent with the RTP/SCS.

Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) 400205.2 5
Table 1
VMT Impact Thresholds
Methods Project Threshold Cumulative Threshold
Transportation Projects (thresholds may apply for SB 743 of GHG purposes) • SBTAM forecast of total
citywide daily VMT1
A significant impact would occur if
the project increased the baseline
VMT within the City.

A significant impact would occur if
the project caused total daily VMT
within the City to be higher than
the no build alternative under
cumulative conditions.
• Consistency check with

SCAG RTP/SCS
N/A A significant impact would occur if
the project is determined to be
inconsistent with the RTP/SCS.
1 It is recommended that SBTAM is used to develop VMT estimates for transportation project impact assessment. However, the analyst must verify the model results for sensitivity to changes in VMT.

Alternatively, if the model is not deemed appropriate, Robert Cervero’s research on lane-mile elasticity and its relationship to VMT can be referenced.

Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Recommended Traffic Impact Analysis
Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and
Level of Service Assessment
February 2020
Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Table of Contents
Introduction 3
Background Information................................................................................................................................................... 4 Note to SBCTA Member Agencies................................................................................................................................ 5 Guidelines Organization.................................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction 6
CEQA Changes ...................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Need for Transportation Impact Analysis 9
TIA REVIEW ...........................................................................................................................................................................10 CEQA Assessment - VMT Analysis 24
Analysis Methodology .....................................................................................................................................................25 CEQA VMT Impact Thresholds .....................................................................................................................................29 VMT Mitigation Measures ..............................................................................................................................................30 CEQA Assessment - Active Transportation and Public Transit Analysis 31 Transportation Impact Study Format .........................................................................................................................33 Attachments 36
Detailed VMT Forecasting Information .....................................................................................................................37 Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Introduction
Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Background Information
SB 743, signed by the Governor in 2013, is changing the way transportation impacts are identified.

Specifically, the legislation has directed the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to look at different metrics for identifying transportation as a CEQA impact. The Final OPR guidelines were released in December 2018 and identified vehicle miles of travel (VMT) as the preferred metric moving forward. The Natural Resources Agency completed the rule making process to modify the CEQA guidelines in December of 2018. The CEQA Guidelines identify that, by July of 2020 all lead agencies must use VMT as the new transportation metric for identifying impacts for land use project.

In anticipation of the change to VMT, SBCTA is currently completing a SB 743 Implementation Study to assist their member organizations with answering important implementation questions about the methodology, thresholds, and mitigation approaches for VMT impact analysis. The SBCTA study includes the following main components.
• Thresholds Evaluation Memorandum – Potential thresholds SBCTA agencies could consider when establishing thresholds of significance for VMT assessment • Sample Projects Memorandum – Types of VMT that could be considered for impact assessment and how project assessment could be performed. • Tools Evaluation Memorandum – Types of tools that could be used to estimate VMT and the pros/cons associated with each tool
• Mitigation Memorandum – Types of mitigation that can be considered for VMT mitigation • VMT Screening Tool – An on-line GIS tool that can be used for VMT screening. This tool is currently under development but will be available for all member agencies to use.

All SBCTA agencies can utilize the information produced through the Implementation Study to adopt their own methodology and significance thresholds for use in CEQA compliance. As noted in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7(b) below, lead agencies are encouraged to formally adopt their significance thresholds and this is key part of the SB 743 implementation process. . (b) Each public agency is encouraged to develop and publish thresholds of significance that the agency uses in the determination of the significance of environmental effects. Thresholds of significance to be adopted for general use as part of the lead agency’s environmental review process must be adopted by ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulation, and developed through a public review process and be supported by substantial evidence. Lead agencies may also use thresholds on a case-by-case basis as provided in Section 15064(b)(2).

To complement the previous work, SBCTA has produced these Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines to outline the specific steps for complying with the new CEQA expectations for VMT analysis and the applicable general plan consistency requirements, which may still involve performing level of service (LOS) analysis for most agencies. These guidelines are intended to be a discretionary ‘template’ that SBCTA agencies may choose to use or modify.

Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Is Level of Service Still Important?
Many jurisdictions in the SBCTA region have adopted vehicle LOS policies that set standards for which local agency infrastructure will strive to maintain. These policies are contained in general plans and therefore apply to discretionary approvals of new land use and transportation projects.

Therefore, these guidelines also include instructions for vehicle LOS analysis consistent with general plan requirements. The LOS guidelines are largely based on the SBCTA Congestion Management Plan (CMP) guidelines that were updated in 2016 and have been updated to reflect state of the practice.

Note to SBCTA Member Agencies
These guidelines have been developed as a resource to SBCTA member agencies. As such, member agencies should utilize and modify these guidelines at their discretion to assist with traffic impact analysis requirements.

In many cases, these guidelines represent thresholds recommended by SBCTA that are applicable to most SBCTA member agencies; however, lead agencies may wish to modify the identified requirements to reflect appropriate goals and values of the agency.

Finally, it should be noted that CEQA requirements change as the CEQA Guidelines are periodically updated and/or legal opinions are rendered that change how analysis is completed. As such, SBCTA local agencies should continually review their guidelines for applicability and consultants should contact the member agency to ensure that they are applying the most recent guidelines for project impact assessment.

Guidelines Organization
The remainder of this guidelines document is organized as follows. We have attempted to organize this memorandum to provide background information, assessment for congestion management/ General Plan Consistency (e.g. LOS analysis), and CEQA assessment (e.g. VMT analysis).

1. Introduction

2. Need for Transportation Impact Study

3. LOS Assessment for General Plan Consistency

4. CEQA Assessment - VMT Analysis

5. CEQA Assessment - Active Transportation and Public Transit Analysis

6. Transportation Impact Analysis Format
Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Introduction
Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) One of the fundamental roles of government agencies is the construction and maintenance of public infrastructure facilities including roadways, rail and bus facilities, bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, stormwater treatment facilities, parks, and other public facilities.

When private development occurs, it is the responsibility of government to ensure that there are adequate public facilities to serve increment population and employment growth. For the transportation system, one way to address this issue is the preparation of a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA).

For the past several decades, the preparation of a TIA was integrated into the CEQA process, in which the TIA was used primarily to analyze a project’s impacts under CEQA. However; with the passage of SB 743, changes to the TIA process are necessary. Specifically, a TIA may be need as a stand-alone document which is a requirement of project approval and will include information for the decision makers that is not required as part of the CEQA process.

The purpose of Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines is to provide general instructions for analyzing the potential transportation impacts of proposed development projects. These guidelines present the recommended format and methodology that should generally be utilized in the preparation of TIAs. These recommendations are based on San Bernardino County’s most recent TIA Guidelines with updates to comply with the state of the practice advances and new California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) expectations prompted by Senate Bill 743 (SB 743). These recommendations are general guidelines and the local agency has the discretion to modify the TIA requirements based on the unique characteristics of a particular project.

CEQA Changes
Since the last TIA Guidelines update, SB 743 was signed into law. A key element of this law is the elimination of auto delay, level of service (LOS), and other similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion as a basis for determining significant impacts. This change is intended to assist in balancing the needs of congestion management with statewide goals related to infill development, promotion of public health through active transportation, and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

SB 743 contains amendments to current congestion management law that allows cities and counties to effectively opt-out of the LOS standards that would otherwise apply in areas where Congestion Management Plans (CMPs) are still used (including San Bernardino County). Further, SB 743 required the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to update the CEQA Guidelines and establish criteria for determining the significance of transportation impacts. In December 2018, OPR released their final recommended guidelines based on feedback with the public, public agencies, and various organizations and individuals. OPR recommended Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as the most appropriate measure of project transportation impacts for land use projects and land use plans. For transportation projects, lead agencies may select their own preferred metric Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) but must support their decision with substantial evidence that complies with CEQA expectations.

SB 743 does not prevent a city or county from continuing to analyze delay or LOS outside of CEQA review for other transportation planning or analysis purposes (i.e., general plans, impact fee programs, corridor studies, congestion mitigation, or ongoing network monitoring); but these metrics may no longer constitute the sole basis for CEQA impacts.

These updated TIA Guidelines have been designed to comply with the new CEQA Guidelines expectations and build on the information prepared for SBCTA’s Implementation Study. The TIA Guidelines are intended for the sole use of SBCTA member agencies. Each member agency can utilize or modify these guidelines as appropriate.

Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Need for Transportation Impact
Analysis
Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) These guidelines describe the key elements required for preparing Traffic Impact Analysis Reports (TIA Reports) for the Congestion Management Program (CMP) in San Bernardino County. The purpose of these guidelines is to achieve a common approach to preparation of TIA Reports by all jurisdictions, thereby reducing inconsistencies and disagreements on how such studies should be performed.

TIA Reports shall be prepared by local jurisdictions when local criteria and thresholds indicate they are necessary. However, TIA Reports must be prepared to satisfy CMP requirements, except as noted below, when a proposed change in land use, development project, or at local discretion, a group of projects are forecast to equal or exceed the CMP threshold of 250 two-way peak hour trips generated, based on trip generation rates published for the applicable use or uses in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation or other CMA-approved data source. Passby trips shall not be considered in the threshold determination. However, industrial, warehousing and truck projects shall convert trucks to PCE’s (or appropriately adjust the capacity assessment to reflect the increase in heavy vehicles) before applying the threshold.

Jurisdictions that have implemented qualifying development mitigation programs that achieve development contribution requirements established by the SANBAG Development Mitigation Nexus Study are not required to prepare TIA reports for CMA review. However, until these jurisdictions have agreements with Caltrans regarding State highway facilities within the jurisdiction, any project meeting the CMP threshold of 250 two-way peak hour trips that expects to add at least 50 peak hour trips to a State highway facility is required to prepare a TIA report for Caltrans’ review.

If a project is forecast to generate 100 to 250 peak hour trips and expects to add at least 50 peak hour trips to a State highway facility, the jurisdiction should consult with Caltrans to determine the need for a TIA report. Refer to Figure B-1 in the CMP for a flow chart that defines when TIA reports need to be prepared.

Projects shall not be split to avoid the CMP requirements. If an additional phase of a project, when added to the preceding phases, causes the sum of the phases to exceed the threshold, the entire project must be analyzed as a unit. The analysis must be conducted when the phases are anticipated and should not wait for later phases, even if earlier phases alone would not exceed the threshold.

Locally determined criteria may be developed which are more stringent than those identified above.

Individual development projects, parcels, or proposals in the same geographic vicinity that can reasonably be combined into a single project for analysis purposes which meets the threshold requirements for a TIA Report shall be analyzed as a single project.

TIA REVIEW
All TIA Reports shall be copied to the CMA. If a TIA Report is prepared by the local jurisdiction as stated above and if the TIA Report determines that the project would add 50 or more 2-way peakhour trips to a CMP arterial within another jurisdiction or 100 2-way peak hour trips to a freeway, that jurisdiction (and Caltrans, if a state highway) shall be provided a copy of the TIA Report by the Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) permitting jurisdiction. However, these criteria are not intended to determine when a local jurisdiction prepares a TIA Report.

It is the responsibility of the local jurisdiction to provide review copies of the TIA Report to the CMA and to potentially impacted jurisdictions so that review will occur in concert with the permitting jurisdiction's project review schedule and prior to any approval or permitting activity. (Note: the transmittal letter shall indicate the agencies receiving the TIA report.) The period allotted for review shall be stipulated by the permitting jurisdiction but shall not be less than 15 working days from the date the CMA receives the report. To establish the date of receipt, it is encouraged the report be transmitted by certified mail. Should serious technical flaws be identified in the TIA Report such that the permitting jurisdiction chooses to recirculate the TIA Report, the recirculated document shall be reviewed no later than 10 working days from the date of receipt.

Note: Caltrans’ review period is 30 days, consistent with CEQA. Lack of comment by Caltrans does not imply acceptance. If an encroachment permit will be required for the project, it is recommended that the jurisdiction work with Caltrans to resolve any outstanding comments before proceeding to project approval.

The reports focus on the potential impacts of land use decisions on the CMP system. These reports are used in conjunction with modeling for the CMP system to forecast transportation deficiencies in San Bernardino County. While there are unique aspects to many projects, the approach outlined here can be applied to the vast majority of projects. The preparer of the report is responsible for presenting all the relevant information that would be helpful in making transportation-related decisions. The guidelines presented here should be regarded as typical minimum requirements.

They are not a substitute for exercising good planning and engineering judgment. Local agencies may wish to include additional requirements for traffic analysis beyond those for the CMP. Only the CMP requirements are addressed here; any requirements added by a jurisdiction apply only in that jurisdiction, unless otherwise agreed.

Other information relating to the preparation of a TIA Report may be found in Chapter 4 of the Congestion Management Program for San Bernardino County. Preparers of TIA Reports should consult the CMP for additional detail.

Implications of CMP Review
The authority to make land use decisions rests with local jurisdictions. A Land Use/Transportation Analysis Program consistent with the CMP guidelines has the potential to influence local land use decisions by requiring full evaluation and disclosure of impacts to the regional transportation system, regardless of jurisdictional boundaries. Local jurisdictions are required to maintain the adopted standards on the CMP system, so it is essential that local jurisdictions consider the necessary actions and costs required to mitigate impacts that result from local land use decisions.

The success of the program relies on consistency with applicable regional plans and the cooperative efforts of local jurisdictions, Caltrans and the CMA. If an integration of land use decisions and the Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) provision of transportation facilities is not accomplished as required by the program, a jurisdiction which fails to mitigate deficiencies on the CMP system caused by its land use decisions will face withholding of its Proposition 111 gas tax increment funds.

TIA Report Content
The TIA Report may be contained within other similar documents (e.g. an EIR prepared under CEQA), or it may be an independent document. The intent is to address all CMP concerns without duplication of other work. In some jurisdictions, the TIA Report may be prepared by the developer or developer's consultant. In other jurisdictions, the TIA Report may be prepared by the jurisdiction or jurisdiction's consultant. In either case, it is in the interest of all parties that the participants fully understand and come to agreement on the assumptions and methodology prior to conducting the actual analysis. This is particularly important when considering using assumptions that vary from the norm. The local jurisdiction may request a meeting with the developer and/or preparer of the TIA Report to discuss the methodology prior to the initiation of work on the analysis. A meeting with the CMA and/or Caltrans, where applicable, is also encouraged to address issues associated with large or extraordinary projects.

The following outline and commentary represent the recommended structure for the TIA Report.

I. Introduction
Set the stage for the analysis, providing background information necessary for the unfamiliar reader to understand the magnitude of the project, location of the project and special characteristics.

Project, general plan, or specific plan description
The description must include project size by land use type, location of project, approximate location of proposed access points to the local and regional roadway system and movements from adjacent streets allowed into and out of the project. This should be shown in a site diagram. Special characteristics of the site, such as unusual daily or seasonal peaking characteristics or heavy involvement of truck traffic, should be mentioned. If the description is included in another part of a more comprehensive document, that is acceptable.

Analysis methodology
Provide a general description (overview) of the process used to analyze the project. Analysis years should be specified and the approach to the modeling/traffic forecasting process should be explained. The sources of information should be identified. The study area and method for LOS analysis for the various roadway types should be identified. At a minimum, the study area must include all freeway links with 100 or more peak-hour project trips (two-way) and other CMP roadways with 50 or more peak-hour project trips (two-way). The study area does not end with a city or county boundary. The study area is defined by the magnitude of project trips alone. In most cases, the analysis need not extend more than five miles beyond the project site, even if there are more than 50 project trips on an arterial and 100 project trips on a freeway. However, analysis of Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) projects in isolated areas with few access routes should be continued until the 100 or 50-trip threshold is met. Within the defined study area, all "key intersections," as listed in the most current CMP, must be analyzed. Key intersections represent intersections of CMP roadways plus those additional intersections recognized by local jurisdictions and/or SANBAG to be important to mobility on CMP roadways. At a minimum, key intersections will include signalized intersections operating at LOS D or below. The distribution of traffic must be shown for all roadways on which project trips occur (except those for internal circulation), whether or not they are on the CMP network.

The analysis of traffic operations and LOS is to be provided for the following conditions and is to include an assessment of traffic mitigation requirements for project opening day and future conditions.

1. Existing conditions – the conditions at the time of TIA preparation without the inclusion of the project generated trips. Existing deficiencies should be identified, but mitigation analysis is not required. The existing conditions analysis must include the full project impact area as defined above.

2. Project opening day conditions - the conditions on the opening day of the project for two scenarios: 1) excluding the project traffic and 2) including the project traffic. Assume full trip generation impact of the site. Full mitigation analysis is to be performed for project opening day conditions. If it is deemed more appropriate because of the nature of the project, another intermediate scenario may be included to focus on the access requirements and/or immediate area surrounding the project, subject to a request by the local jurisdiction. The methodology used for distribution of project traffic at project opening day conditions is at the discretion of the local jurisdiction.

3. Future conditions - the conditions for two model forecast year scenarios: 1) excluding the project traffic and 2) including the project traffic. Full mitigation analysis is to be performed for future conditions. In addition, a staging analysis of mitigations may be required for large projects constructed over a long time period. The need for a staging analysis will be determined by the local jurisdiction.

The analysis of the project opening day and future condition shall be based on, at a minimum, the PM peak-hour of the adjacent street traffic. An analysis of the AM peak-hour of the adjacent street traffic is also required for developments containing residential land uses and may be required for other types of development at local discretion. Analysis may be required for peak-hours other than the AM and PM peak for some land uses. This determination will be made by the local jurisdiction.

The peak traffic generation hour of the development, if different from peak AM and PM hours, must also be identified and the total vehicle trips during the peak-hour of the generator must be estimated. This will facilitate a decision regarding the need to evaluate time periods other than the peak-hours of the adjacent streets.

Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Note: For State highway facilities, analysis of future conditions for is only required for the following:
1) jurisdictions that have not adopted qualifying development mitigation programs that achieve development contribution requirements established by the SANBAG Development Mitigation Nexus Study and 2) State highway facilities that are not included in the SANBAG Development Mitigation Nexus Study or are not subject to an agreement with Caltrans.

II. Existing conditions
Existing roadway system
Provide a map and brief written description of the roadway network. The number and type of lanes on freeways, principal arterials and other impacted roadways should be identified. Signalized intersections and plans for signalization should be identified. The existing number of lanes at key CMP intersections should be clearly identified on a graphic or in conjunction with the LOS analysis output. Maps of the CMP network are available in the Congestion Management Program documentation, available from the CMA. Also describe the relevant portions of the future network as specified with officially approved funding sources.

Existing volumes
Existing average weekday daily traffic (AWDT) should be identified for the CMP links in the study area. Historic volume growth trends in the study area should be shown. Consult the local jurisdiction, Caltrans and San Bernardino County for additional information.

Existing LOS
A LOS analysis must be conducted on all existing segments and intersections on the CMP network potentially impacted by the project or plan (as defined by the thresholds in Section I. B). Urban segments (i.e., segments on roadways that are generally signalized with spacing less than 2 miles) do not require segment analysis. Segment requirements can normally be determined by the analysis of lane requirements at intersections. Freeway mainline must be analyzed and ramp/weaving analysis may be required at local discretion, if a ramp or weaving problem is anticipated. Several software packages are available for conducting LOS analysis for signalized intersections, freeways and other types of roadways. The software package and version used must be identified. Normally, the existing LOS analysis for intersections will be run using optimized signal timing, since the future analysis will normally need to be run using optimized timing. Signal timing optimization should consider pedestrian safety and signal coordination requirements. Minimum times should be no less than 10 seconds.

Saturation flow rates are considered as average field measured saturation flow rates and in no case shall the adjusted saturation flow rates of the 2000 Highway Capacity Software be allowed to go lower than the specified saturation flow rates listed on page C-13 of the CMP, when field data are not available. However, there shall be no restriction on minimum saturation flow rates if actual saturation flow rates are available.

Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Default lost time is two seconds per phase and a clearance signal time of three seconds. Without local data to show otherwise, a peak-hour factor of 0.95 may be assumed for existing and full generation scenarios. Variations from these values must be documented and justified. LOS analyses should be field-verified so that the results are reasonably consistent with observation and errors in the analysis are more likely to be caught. A brief commentary on existing problem areas must be included in this section, bringing existing problems to the attention of the readers.

Only project opening day and future scenarios with project require that traffic operational problems be mitigated to provide LOS E or better operation. If the lead agency or an affected adjacent jurisdiction requires mitigation to a higher LOS, this takes precedence over the CMP requirements.

The LOS threshold for State highway facilities will be the same as the jurisdiction where the facility is located but no greater than a 45 second average delay per vehicle in the peak hour (middle of LOS “D”). Caltrans acknowledges that this may not always be feasible and recommends that the lead agency consult with Caltrans to determine the appropriate target LOS. If an existing State highway facility is operating at less than the appropriate target LOS, the existing LOS should be maintained.

Related general plan issues
The relationship to the general plan may be identified. This section should provide general background information from the Traffic Circulation Element of the General Plan, including plans for the ultimate number of lanes, new roadways planned for the future and other information that provides a context for how the proposed project interrelates with the future planned transportation system.

III. Future conditions
Traffic forecasts
One of the primary products of the TIA is the comparison of future traffic conditions with and without the project. The primary forecasts will be for the CMP forecast year (consult the CMA for the most currently applicable forecast years). If a project is phased over a development period past the CMP forecast year, a buildout forecast with forecast background traffic must also be provided.

There are two components of the forecast that need to be considered: background traffic and project traffic. Acceptable methodologies for these forecasts are described below.

Project Traffic Forecasts
Two basic alternatives are available for forecasting project traffic:
• Manual method - Generate project trips using rates from the ITE Trip Generation report.

Distribute and assign the trips based on the location of the project relative to the remainder of the urban area and on the type of land use. Rather than relying on pure judgment to develop the distribution of project traffic, the future year CMP model select zone needs to be obtained from SCAG to determine the distribution pattern. The percentage distribution should be Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) reasonably related to the location of and the number of trips generated by zones surrounding the project. Computer-assisted trip distribution and assignment methods may be used as long as they reasonably represent the travel characteristics of the area in which the project is located.

It should be noted that the model does not forecast project trucks. Therefore distribution needs to be made in a reasonable manner.
• Use of local model - Create a zone or zones that represent the project (if not already contained in the local model). The CMP model may be used if new zones are created to represent the project (it is unlikely that the CMP model will already have zones small enough to represent the project). The zone or zones should include the exact representation of driveway locations with centroid connectors. It is important that the driveway representations be exact to produce acceptable turning movement volumes. Some adjustments to the turning movement volumes may be needed, depending on the adequacy of this representation.

The above methodologies may produce different results, both in the generation of trips and the distribution of trips. However, both methods will have application, depending on the jurisdiction and on the type and size of project. It should be noted that a model select zone run shall be used for distribution and ITE trip generation rates for project trips.

Background Traffic Forecasts
Background traffic refers to all traffic other than the traffic associated with the project itself. The background traffic shall include intersection turning movement and segment truck volumes by classification (converted to PCE's) as shown on page C-12 on arterial streets of the CMP, interchange ramps and mainline freeway lanes. Future scenarios shall use the truck model (converted to PCEs) or 150 percent of the existing truck volume for arterials and freeway ramps and 160 percent for mainline freeway lanes in a special generator area such as found in the City of Fontana (between I15 and Citrus Avenue and between San Bernardino Avenue and Jurupa Avenue).

Several alternatives for forecasting background traffic are:
• For project opening day analysis - Use accepted growth rates provided by the jurisdictions in which the analysis is to take place. Each jurisdiction's growth rates should be used for intersections and segments within that jurisdiction. A table of growth rates may be available from the jurisdictions.
• For horizon year - The traffic passenger vehicle and truck classification (in PCEs) models will provide the needed forecasts and if requested, passenger vehicle background plus project forecasts. Local models may also be used to generate intersection and segment forecasts, if a traffic refinement process is properly applied to maximize the quality and reasonableness of the forecasts. Alternatively, the CMP model may be used to generate growth factors by subarea, which may be applied to existing intersection and segment volumes. The separate forecasting of background traffic by each TIA Report preparer is redundant, will only create conflict among reports and should be avoided by the city/county providing an acceptable background forecast for use by all TIA Report preparers. Ideally, cities and/or the County should establish the background forecasts annually for use by project applicants. Until the city/county is in a position Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) to produce these forecasts on a routine basis, they may wish to use the results of the background forecasts from prior acceptable TIA Reports as the basis for background forecasts for other TIA Reports. The availability of such forecasts should be established before initiating the preparation of a TIA Report. If the CMP model is being used as the basis for the forecast, assume that the project is not included in the CMP model forecast (unless it can be definitively proven otherwise). If a local model is being used, the background traffic will be derived by subtracting the project traffic from the forecast where the project is already represented in the model. Where the project is not represented in the model, the background traffic can be directly derived from the model (with appropriate refinement to maintain quality and reasonableness of the forecasts).

A Note on Methodology for General Plans and Specific Plans:

In the case of analysis of general plan revisions/updates or specific plans, the same approach is applied as above. However, the "project" to be analyzed shall consist of the proposed land use. For threshold determination use the difference between the previously approved general plan and the proposed revision to the general plan. Unless otherwise agreed by the local jurisdiction, the analysis must assume the maximum intensity of land uses allowed (i.e., worst case) on the parcels to which the revision applies. All new specific plans must be analyzed based on worst case assumptions.

Although general plans may not identify specific access locations, the analysis must assume access locations that are reasonable, based on the location and size of the plan.

A. Traffic added by project, general plan revision/update, or specific plan The methods for generating and distributing project trips must be consistent with the appropriate methodology listed above. The total number of trips generated by the project must be specified by land use. The source of the trip generation rates must be documented. Project trips (inbound and outbound) must be identified on a graphic map for both the peak hour or hours being studied.

Any assumed reductions in trip generation rates, such as internal trips and transit/TDM reductions must be documented. Pass-by trips may be allowed only for retail uses and fast-food restaurants.

The pass-by and internal trip percentages and methodology must be consistent with the estimates and methodology contained in the latest ITE Trip Generation handbook. The internal trip percentage must be justified by having a mixed-use development of sufficient size. In special cases, larger reductions may be allowed; but these must be documented and justified. Reductions for transit or TDM must be accompanied by an explanation of how the strategies will actually be implemented and may require a monitoring program.

Industrial and warehouse truck uses must also show the estimated number and distribution of truck trips (in PCE’s) for the same hours. The methodology utilized to obtain trip generation rates and truck percentages applied in traffic impact analyses for industrial and warehouse (including ‘high-cube’) land uses must be clearly defined. Trip rates shall be obtained from the latest edition of ITE’s Trip Generation manual or from current and relevant studies and shall be approved by the local jurisdiction.

Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) B. Transit and TDM considerations
Transit and travel demand management strategies are a consideration in many development projects. Requirements within each jurisdiction are contained in the local TDM ordinance, to be adopted by each local jurisdiction as part of the CMP requirements. Examples of items to include are location of transit stops in relationship to the proposed project, designation of ridesharing coordinator, posting of information on transit routes and ridesharing information, provision of transit passes, etc.

C. Traffic model forecasts
Provide a map showing link volumes by direction. All CMP arterial links with 50 or more peak-hour project trips (two-way) and freeway links with 100 or more peak-hour project trips (two-way) must be shown. The factor to derive a peak-hour from the three-hour AM peak period is 0.38. The factor to derive a peak-hour from the four-hour PM peak is 0.28. All model forecasts shall be post processed. Appendix E in the CMP documentation contains guidelines for model post processing.

D. Future LOS
Compute levels of service for CMP segments and intersections based on the procedures in the latest Highway Capacity Manual. Refer to the procedures adopted in Chapter 2 of the CMP and the assumptions specified in section II.C of this appendix. Copies of the volumes, intersection geometry, capacity analysis worksheets and all relevant assumptions must be included as appendices to the TIA Report. It should be noted that the v/c ratio and implied LOS that can be output by travel demand models are different from the LOS analysis prescribed in this section. The capacities used in the model are not typically the same capacities as used in the capacity analysis.

Intersections and segments on State highway facilities should be analyzed as a coordinated system.

Left turn, through and right turn lane queuing analysis is highly desirable to validate an intersection's LOS. This more detailed analysis is meant to ensure the various movements do not overflow and impede adjacent movements and is left to the discretion of the local agency.

E. Description of projected LOS problems
Identify resulting levels of service for intersections and segments, as appropriate, on a map for applicable peak-hours. Describe in the text the nature of expected LOS problems. Describe any other impacts that the project may also have on the CMP roadway network, particularly access requirements.

F. Project contribution to total new volumes (forecast minus existing) on analyzed links Compute the ratio of traffic generated by the proposed development to the total new traffic (including project traffic) generated between the existing condition and forecast year for each analyzed link or intersection. The purpose of this calculation is to identify the proportion of volume increase that can be attributed to the proposed project. This will be a necessary component of any deficiency plans prepared under the CMP at a later date. The calculations are to be conducted for Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) all applicable peak hours. The results may be shown on a map or in a table by percentages to the nearest tenth of a percent.

IV. Project mitigation.

The mitigation of project impacts is designed to identify potential LOS problems and to address them before they actually occur. This will also provide a framework for negotiations between the local jurisdiction and the project developer. The CMA will not be involved in these negotiations unless requested by a local jurisdiction. Impacts beyond the boundaries of the jurisdiction must be identified in the same fashion as impacts within the jurisdictional boundary. Impacted local agencies outside the boundary will be provided an opportunity for review of the TIA Report. Negotiations with these outside jurisdictions and with Caltrans are a possible outcome, depending on the magnitude and nature of the impacts.

For the CMP, the mitigations must bring the roadway into conformance with the LOS standards established for the CMP. However, local agencies may require conformance to higher standards, and these must be considered in consultation with the local jurisdiction. Measures to address local needs that are independent from the CMP network should be included in the TIA Report for continuity purposes. Consult the local jurisdiction to determine requirements which may be beyond the requirements of the CMP. The information required in this part of the TIA Report is described below.

Other transportation improvements already programmed and fully funded Only transportation improvements that are fully funded should be assumed in forecast.

Roadway improvements needed to maintain CMP LOS standard These should include an evaluation of intersection turn lanes, signalization, signal coordination and link lane additions, at a minimum. If a freeway is involved, lane requirements and ramp treatments to solve LOS deficiencies must be examined. Prior studies on the same sections may be furnished to the preparer of the TIA and such studies may be referenced if they do, in fact, provide the necessary mitigation for the proposed project. However, the calculation of percentage of contribution of the project to the growth in traffic must still be provided for the appropriate peakhours, as described earlier. If the physical or environmental constraints make mitigation unlikely, then the contribution may be used to improve LOS elsewhere on the system or another location that would relieve the impact. The point of referencing a previously conducted study is to avoid unnecessary duplication of effort on the same sections of roadway. Copies of previously conducted relevant studies in the area may be obtained from the local jurisdictions or the CMA, including any plans resulting from the annual modeling runs for the CMP.

Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Other improvements needed to maintain the LOS standard
In some cases, additional transit and TDM strategies beyond what was in the original assumptions may be necessary to provide an adequate mitigation. These must be described and the method for implementation must be discussed.

LOS with improvements
The LOS with improvements must be computed and shown on a map or table along with the traffic LOS without improvements. Delay values, freeway volume/capacity ratios, or other measures of LOS must be included in the results (could be in an appendix) along with the letter designation.

Cost estimates
The costs of mitigating deficiencies must be estimated for deficiencies that occur either within or outside the boundaries of the jurisdiction. The costs must be identified separately for each jurisdiction and for Caltrans roadways. Prior studies and cost estimates by SANBAG, Caltrans and other jurisdictions may be referenced. Used together with the analysis conducted in Section III.G, this will provide an approximation of project contribution to the needed improvements. This estimate is prepared for discussion purposes with the local jurisdiction and with neighboring jurisdictions and Caltrans. It does not imply any legal responsibility or formula for contributions to mitigations. If a mitigation measure is identified as necessary to bring a deficiency into conformance with the LOS standard, but physical or environmental constraints make the improvement impractical, an equivalent contribution should be considered to improve the LOS elsewhere on the system or another location providing direct relief. F. Relationship to other elements While the measures required to address air quality problems are not required for the TIA Report, they may be required as part of a CEQA review. The TIA Report may be integrated with environmental documents prepared for CEQA requirements. This is at the discretion of the local jurisdiction.

V. Conclusions and recommendations
Summary of proposed mitigations and costs
Provide a summary of the impacts, proposed mitigations and the costs of the mitigations. A cost estimate for the proposed mitigations must be included. Generalized unit costs will be available from either Caltrans or the local jurisdiction. The source of the unit cost estimates used must be specified in the TIA Report.

Other recommendations
List any other recommendations that should be brought to the attention of the local jurisdiction, the CMA, or Caltrans. This may include anticipated problems beyond the forecast year or on portions of the network not analyzed.

Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Summary List of Typical Figures and Tables to Be Included in a TIA Report:
• Project location and 5-mile limit study area (map)
• Project size by land use (table)
• Trips generated by land use for AM and PM weekday peak-hours of adjacent street traffic and for daily traffic inbound and outbound (table) and other applicable peak-hours • List of other planned transportation improvements affecting the project • Existing intersection and link volumes and levels of service (map) • Distribution and assignment of project trips (map)
• Forecast traffic without project and with project for applicable peak-hours (map or table) • LOS without project and with project (map or table) • Improvements required to mitigate project opening day and forecast year scenario impacts (map and/or table) • Ratio of project traffic to new traffic (new traffic means the difference between existing and forecast) on analyzed links or intersections (map or table) • Improvement costs by jurisdiction and for Caltrans roadways
Summary of Analysis Assumptions for the TIA:

LOS Analysis Procedures and Assumptions
Intersections
• Current HCM operational analysis.
• Optimized signal timing/phasing for future signal analysis, unless assumed to be in a coordinated system, in which case estimated actual cycle length is used. The maximum cycle length for a single signalized intersection or system should be 130 seconds. • 10 second minimum phase time, including change interval. • Average arrivals, unless a coordinated signal system dictates otherwise. • Ideal lane width (12 feet).
• "Required" solution if analysis by Webster.
• Exclusive right turn lane is assumed to exist if pavement is wide enough to permit a separate right turn, even if it is not striped. (Minimum 20' from curb line to lane stripe). • 2 second lost time/phase.
• A full saturation flow rate can be assumed for an extra lane provided on the upstream of the intersection only if this lane also extends at least 600 feet downstream of the intersection (or to the next downstream intersection).
• PHF = 0.95 for future analysis.
• The lane utilization factor may also be set at 1.00 when the v/c ratio for the lane group approaches 1.0, as lanes tend to be more equally utilized in such situations. • For light duty trucks (such as service vehicles, buses, RV’s and dual rear wheels) use a PCE of 1.5. For medium duty trucks with 3 axles use a PCE of 2.0. For heavy duty trucks with 4 axles, use a PCE of 3.0.
• Industrial, warehousing and other Projects with high truck percentages should convert to PCE’s before applying thresholds.

Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) • When field saturation flow rates and any special intersection characteristics are not available, the following field adjusted saturation flow rates are recommended for analysis.

Existing and Opening Day Scenarios
• Exclusive thru: 1,800 vehicles per hour green per lane (vphgpl) • Exclusive left: 1,700 vphgpl
• Exclusive right: 1,800 vphgpl
• Exclusive double left: 1,600 vphgpl • Exclusive triple left: 1,500 vphgpl or less Future Scenarios
• Exclusive thru: 1,900 vphgpl • Exclusive left: 1,800 vphgpl • Exclusive right: 1,900 vphgpl
• Exclusive double right: 1,800 vphgpl
• Exclusive double left: 1,700 vphgpl
• Exclusive triple left: 1,600 vphgpl or less
• Note: Existing field saturation flow rates should be used if they are available and any special traffic or geometric characteristics should also be taken into account if known to affect traffic flow.

Freeways
• Capacity of 2,200 vehicles/hour/lane (1,600/hr/lane/HOV) • Use Caltrans truck percentages (includes trucks, buses and RV's) • Peak-hour factor of 0.98 for congested areas and 0.95 for less congested areas • Directional distribution of 55% and 45%, if using non-directional volumes from Caltrans volume book
• Design speed of 70 mph
Stop Controlled Intersections
• Current HCM for 2-way and 4-way stops
Project-Related Assumptions
• Use the latest ITE Trip Generation handbook for mixed use internal trip percentages. Higher percentages must be fully justified.
• Pass by trips - Retail uses and fast food restaurants only • Use ITE procedures to estimate percentage
• For analysis at entry points into site, driveway volume is not reduced (i.e., trip generation rate is still the same). Rather, trips are redistributed based on the assumed prevalent directions of pass-by trips (see recommended ITE procedure). • Reductions for transit or TDM are a maximum of 10% unless higher can be justified. Other
Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) • If a new traffic generating development project (other than a single family residential unit) within a federally designated urbanized area abuts a state highway or abuts a highway that intersects a State highway within 500 feet of that intersection, the local jurisdiction in which the development occurs must notify Caltrans and the CMA.
• The TIA procedures will be reviewed biannually. Forward comments to the CMA. • Industrial warehouse and truck projects may distribute only truck trips by hand. (Employee trip distribution shall be modeled.)
• Intersections will be considered deficient (LOS “F”) if the critical v/c ratio equals or exceeds 1.0, even if the LOS defined by the delay value is above the defined LOS standard.
• All the computer-generated traffic forecasts need to be refined for use in TIA reports to provide the best estimate of future volumes possible. Traffic forecasts should be post processed by using “B” turns software available through SCAG or another approved methodology. However, the post processing of turning movements is restricted to local models only.

Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) CEQA Assessment - VMT
Analysis
Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) A key element of SB 743, signed in 2013, is the elimination of automobile delay and LOS as the sole basis of determining CEQA impacts. The most recent CEQA guidelines, released in December 2018, recommend VMT as the most appropriate measure of project transportation impacts. However, SB 743 does not prevent a city or county from continuing to analyze delay or LOS as part of other plans (i.e., the general plan), studies, or ongoing network monitoring.

The following recommendations assist in determining VMT impact thresholds and mitigation requirements for various land use projects’ TIAs.

Analysis Methodology
For purposes of SB 743 compliance, a VMT analysis should be conducted for land use projects as deemed necessary by the Traffic Division and would apply to projects that have the potential to increase the average VMT per service population (e.g. population plus employment) compared to the SBCTA region or the lead agency boundary. Normalizing VMT per service population essentially provides a transportation efficiency metric that the analysis is based on. Using this efficiency metric allows the user to compare the project to the remainder of the unincorporated area for purposes of identifying transportation impacts.

These guidelines are based on the SBCTA SB 743 Implementation Study which provides options for both methodologies and VMT screening. The methodologies and significance thresholds presented below are based on SBCTA recommendations from the Implementation Study; lead agencies may wish to modify these thresholds with alternative thresholds of significance and methodologies as appropriate.

Project Screening
There are three types of screening that lead agencies can apply to effectively screen projects from project-level assessment. These screening steps are summarized below:

Step 1: Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening
Projects located within a TPA1 may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. This presumption may NOT be appropriate if the project:
1 A TPA is defined as a half mile area around an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along a high quality transit corridor per the definitions below.

Pub. Resources Code, § 21064.3 - ‘Major transit stop’ means a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.

Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled)

1. Has a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of less than 0.75;

2. Includes more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than required by the jurisdiction (if the jurisdiction requires the project to supply parking);

3. Is inconsistent with the applicable Sustainable Communities Strategy (as determined by the lead agency, with input from the Metropolitan Planning Organization); or

4. Replaces affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate- or high-income residential units.

Step 2: Low VMT Area Screening
Residential and office projects located within a low VMT-generating area may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. In addition, other employment-related and mixed-use land use projects may qualify for the use of screening if the project can reasonably be expected to generate VMT per resident, per worker, or per service population that is similar to the existing land uses in the low VMT area.

For this screening in the SBCTA area, the SBTAM travel forecasting model was used to measure VMT performance for individual jurisdictions and for individual traffic analysis zones (TAZs). TAZs are geographic polygons similar to Census block groups used to represent areas of homogenous travel behavior. Total daily VMT per service population (population plus employment) was estimated for each TAZ. This presumption may not be appropriate if the project land uses would alter the existing built environment in such a way as to increase the rate or length of vehicle trips.

To identify if the project is in a low VMT-generating area, the analyst may review the SBCTA screening tool and apply the appropriate threshold (identified later in this chapter) within the tool.

Additionally, as noted above, the analyst mush identify if the project is consistent with the existing land use within that TAZ and use professional judgement that there is nothing unique about the project that would otherwise be mis-represented utilizing the data from the travel demand model.

The SBCTA screening tool can be accessed at the following location:
http://gis.fehrandpeers.com/WRCOGVMT/
Step 3: Project Type Screening
Local serving retail projects less than 50,000 square feet may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. Local serving retail generally improves the convenience of shopping close to home and has the effect of reducing vehicle travel.

Pub. Resources Code, § 21155 - For purposes of this section, a ‘high-quality transit corridor’ means a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours.

Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) In addition to local serving retail, the following uses can also be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary as their uses are local serving in nature:
• Local-serving K-12 schools
• Local parks
• Day care centers
• Local-serving gas stations
• Local-serving banks
• Local-serving hotels (e.g. non-destination hotels)
• Student housing projects on or adjacent to college campuses • Local-serving assembly uses (places of worship, community organizations) • Community institutions (Public libraries, fire stations, local government) • Local serving community colleges that are consistent with the assumptions noted in the

RTP/SCS
• Affordable or supportive housing
• Assisted living facilities
• Senior housing (as defined by HUD)
• Projects generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips2 o This generally corresponds to the following “typical” development potentials:
 11 single family housing units
 16 multi-family, condominiums, or townhouse housing units  10,000 sq. ft. of office
 15,000 sq. ft. of light industrial3
 63,000 sq. ft. of warehousing7
 79,000 sq. ft. of high cube transload and short-term storage warehouse7 2 This threshold ties directly to the OPR technical advisory and notes that CEQA provides a categorical exemption for existing facilities, including additions to existing structures of up to 10,000 square feet, so long as the project is in an area where public infrastructure is available to allow for maximum planned development and the project is not in an environmentally sensitive area. (CEQA Guidelines, § 15301, subd. (e)(2).) Typical project types for which trip generation increases relatively linearly with building footprint (i.e., general office building, single tenant office building, office park, and business park) generate or attract an additional 110-124 trips per 10,000 square feet. Therefore, absent substantial evidence otherwise, it is reasonable to conclude that the addition of 110 or fewer trips could be considered not to lead to a significant impact.
3 Threshold may be higher depending on the tenant and the use of the site. This number was estimated using rates from ITE’s Trip Generation Manual.

Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) VMT Assessment for Non-Screened Development
Projects not screened through the steps above should complete VMT analysis and forecasting through the SBTAM model to determine if they have a significant VMT impact. This analysis should include ‘project generated VMT’ and ‘project effect on VMT’ estimates for the project TAZ (or TAZs) under the following scenarios:
• Baseline conditions - This data is already available in the web screening map. • Baseline plus project for the project - The project land use would be added to the project TAZ or a separate TAZ would be created to contain the project land uses. A full base year model run would be performed and VMT changes would be isolated for the project TAZ and across the full model network. The model output must include reasonableness checks of the production and attraction balancing to ensure the project effect is accurately captured. If this scenario results in a less-than-significant impact, then additional cumulative scenario analysis may not be required (more information about this outcome can be found in the Thresholds Evaluation discussion later in this chapter). • Cumulative no project - This data is available from SBCTA. • Cumulative plus project - The project land use would either be added to the project TAZ or a separate TAZ would be created to contain the project land uses. The addition of project land uses should be accompanied by a reallocation of a similar amount of land use from other TAZs; especially if the proposed project is significant in size such that it would change other future developments. Land use projects will generally not change the cumulative no project control totals for population and employment growth. Instead, they will influence the land use supply through changes in general plan land use designations and zoning. If project land uses are simply added to the cumulative no project scenario, then the analysis should reflect this limitation in the methodology and acknowledge that the analysis may overestimate the project’s effect on VMT.

The model output should include total VMT, which includes all vehicle trips and trip purposes, and VMT per service population (population plus employment). Total VMT (by speed bin) is needed as an input for air quality, greenhouse gas (GHG), and energy impact analysis while total VMT per service population is recommended for transportation impact analysis4.

Both “plus project” scenarios noted above will summarize two types of VMT: (1) project generated VMT per service population and comparing it back to the appropriate benchmark noted in the 4 This assumes that the lead agency will use VMT per service population for its impact threshold. If a lead agency decides to isolate VMT by trip purpose, then the lead agency would need to update this section of the recommended guidelines.

Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) thresholds of significance, and (2) the project effect on VMT, comparing how the project changes VMT on the network looking at Citywide VMT per service population or a sub-regional VMT per service population and comparing it to the no project condition.

Project-generated VMT shall be extracted from the travel demand forecasting model using the origin-destination trip matrix and shall multiply that matrix by the final assignment skims. The project-effect on VMT shall be estimated using a sub-regional boundary (such as a City limit or County line) and extracting the total link-level VMT for both the no project and with project condition.

In some cases, it may be appropriate to extract the Project-generated VMT using the productionattraction trip matrix. This may be appropriate when a project is entirely composed of retail or office uses, and there is a need to isolate the home-based-work (HBW) VMT for the purposes of isolating commute VMT. The City should evaluate the appropriate methodology based on the project land use types and context.

A detailed description of this process is attached to these guidelines.

CEQA VMT Impact Thresholds
The SBCTA Implementation Study provided several options related to VMT thresholds of significance and guidance/substantial evidence related to thresholds of significance. Lead agencies should refer to that document for guidance/options.

VMT Impacts
An example of how VMT thresholds would be applied to determine potential VMT impacts is provided below.

A project would result in a significant project-generated VMT impact if either of the following conditions are satisfied:

1. The baseline project-generated VMT per service population exceeds the lead agency’s baseline VMT per service population (note, for more efficient cities in the SBCTA region, the lead agency could compare itself to the San Bernardino County regional average instead), or

2. The cumulative project-generated VMT per service population exceeds the lead agency’s baseline VMT per service population (note, for more efficient cities in the SBCTA region, the lead agency could compare itself to the San Bernardino County regional average instead).

The project’s effect on VMT would be considered significant if it resulted in either of the following conditions to be satisfied:

Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled)

1. The baseline link-level boundary VMT per service population (City or sub-regional boundary) to increase under the plus project condition compared to the no project condition), or

2. The cumulative link-level boundary VMT per service population (City or subregional boundary) to increase under the plus project condition compared to the no project condition).

Please note that the cumulative no project shall reflect the adopted RTP/SCS; as such, if a project is consistent with the regional RTP/SCS, then the cumulative impacts shall be considered less than significant subject to consideration of other substantial evidence VMT Mitigation Measures
To mitigate VMT impacts, the following choices are available to the applicant:

1. Modify the project’s built environment characteristics to reduce VMT generated by the project

2. Implement transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures to reduce VMT generated by the project.

3. Participate in a VMT fee program and/or VMT mitigation exchange/banking program (if they exist) to reduce VMT from the project or other land uses to achieve acceptable levels As part of the SBCTA Implementation Study, key TDM measures that are appropriate to the region were identified.

Measures appropriate for most of the SBCTA region are summarized in Attachment B of the TDM Strategies Evaluation Memorandum. Evaluation of VMT reductions should be evaluated using stateof-the-practice methodologies recognizing that many of the TDM strategies are dependent on building tenant performance over time. As such, actual VMT reduction cannot be reliably predicted and monitoring may be necessary to gauge performance related to mitigation expectations.

Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) CEQA Assessment - Active
Transportation and Public
Transit Analysis
Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Potential impacts to public transit, pedestrian facilities and travel, and bicycle facilities and travel can be evaluated using the following criteria.
• A significant impact occurs if the project conflicts with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decreases the performance or safety of such facilities.

Therefore, the TIA should include analysis of a project to examine if it is inconsistent with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding active transportation or public transit facilities, or otherwise decreases the performance or safety of such facilities and make a determination as to whether it has the potential to conflict with existing or proposed facilities supporting these travel modes.

Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Transportation Impact Study
Format
Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) The recommended TIA format is as follows:

1. Executive Summary
a. Table summarizing significant impacts and mitigation measures

2. Introduction
a. Purpose of the TIA and study objective
b. Project location and vicinity map (Exhibit)
c. Project size and description
d. Existing and proposed land use and zoning
e. Site plan and proposed project (Exhibit)
f. Proposed project opening year and analysis scenarios

3. Methodology and Impact Thresholds

4. Existing Conditions
a. Existing roadway network
b. Existing traffic control and intersection geometrics (Exhibit) c. Existing traffic volumes – AM and PM peak hour and ADT (Exhibit) d. Existing level of service (LOS) at intersections (Table) e. Existing bicycle facilities (Exhibit)
f. Existing transit facilities (Exhibit)
g. Existing pedestrian facilities

5. Project Traffic
a. Trip generation (Table)
b. Trip distribution and assignment (Exhibit)
c. Project peak hour turning movements and ADT (Exhibit)

6. Background Conditions (Opening Year) Analysis
a. No Project analysis
i. Committed (funded) roadway improvements
ii. Approved project trip generation (Table, if required) iii. Approved project trip assignment and distribution (Exhibit, if required) iv. Peak turning movement and ADT (Exhibit)
v. Intersection level of service (Table)
vi. Roadway segment level of service (Table)
b. Plus Project analysis
i. Plus Project peak turning movement and ADT (Exhibit) ii. Intersection level of service (Table)
iii. Roadway segment level of service (Table)
Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) iv. Identification of intersection and roadway segment deficiencies

7. Cumulative Year Analysis
a. No Project analysis
i. Committed (funded) roadway improvements
ii. Pending projects and verification of how they are included in the travel demand forecasting model
iii. Cumulative Year peak turning movement and ADT (Exhibit) iv. Intersection level of service (Table)
v. Roadway segment level of service (Table)
b. Plus Project Analysis
i. Plus Project peak turning movement and ADT (Exhibit) ii. Intersection level of service (Table)
iii. Roadway segment level of service (Table)
iv. Identification of intersection and roadway segment deficiencies

8. Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis

9. Site Access Analysis

10. Safety and Operation Improvement Analysis

11. Active Transportation and Public Transit Analysis

12. Improvements and Recommendations
a. Proposed improvements at intersections
b. Proposed improvements at roadway segments
c. Recommended Improvements categorized by whether they are included in fee plan or not. (Identify if these improvements are included in an adopted fee program)

13. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis
a. Project VMT per person/employee for all analysis scenarios b. Project effect on VMT for all analysis scenarios
c. Identification of VMT impacts
d. Proposed VMT Mitigation Measures

14. Appendix
a. Approved scope of work
b. Traffic counts
c. Intersection analysis worksheets
d. VMT and TDM calculations
e. VMT and TDM mitigation calculations
f. Signal warrant worksheets
Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachments
Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Detailed VMT Forecasting Information
Most trip-based models generate daily person trip-ends for each TAZ across various trip purposes (HBW, HBO, and NHB, for example) based on population, household, and employment variables.

This may create challenges for complying with the VMT guidance because trip generation is not directly tied to specific land use categories. The following methodology addresses this particular challenge among others.

Production and attraction trip-ends are separately calculated for each zone, and generally:
production trip-ends are generated by residential land uses and attraction trip-ends are generated by non-residential land uses. OPR's guidance addresses residential, office, and retail land uses.

Focusing on residential and office land uses, the first step to forecasting VMT requires translating the land use into model terms, the closest approximations are:
• Residential: home-based production trips
• Office: home-based work attraction trips
Note that this excludes all non-home-based trips including work-based other and other-based other trips.

The challenges with computing VMT for these two types of trips in a trip-based model are 1) production and attraction trip-ends are not distinguishable after the PA to OD conversion process and 2) trip purposes are not maintained after the mode choice step. For these reasons, it not possible to use the VMT results from the standard vehicle assignment (even using a select zone reassignment). A separate post-process must be developed to re-estimate VMT for each zone that includes trip-end types and trip purposes. Two potential approaches to tackle this problem are described below.

Simplified
This approach uses standard model output files and requires minimal custom calculations. It is based on a regional MPO trip-based model with peak (PK) and off-peak (OP) skims and person trip production-attraction (PA) matrices.
• Calculate custom vehicle trip PA matrices from PK and OP person trip matrices o Keep trip purposes and modes separate
o Use average vehicle occupancy rates for drive-alone and shared ride trips • Use the final congested drive-alone PK and OP skim matrices to estimate trip length between zones
• Multiply the skim matrices by vehicle trip matrices to estimate VMT • Sum the PK and OP results to estimate daily VMT and aggregate mode trip purpose and mode
Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) • Calculate automobile VMT for individual TAZs using marginal totals:
o Residential (home-based) - row total
o Office (home-based work) - column total
Detailed
The process described above simplifies the approach but does not account for different congestion patterns throughout the day (AM, MD, PM, and NT), the direction of travel (all productions are origins and all attractions are destinations), or the benefits of exclusive lanes (HOV or HOT lanes).

This more detailed approach attempts to address these limitations and better estimate the VMT produced by the vehicle assignment model.
• Re-skim final loaded congested networks for each mode and time period • Run a custom PA to OD process that replicates actual model steps, but:
o Keeps departure and return trips separate
o Keeps trip purpose and mode separate
o Converts person trips to vehicle trips based on auto occupancy rates and isolates automobile trips
o Factors vehicle trips into assignment time periods
• Multiply appropriate distance skim matrices by custom OD matrices to estimate VMT • Sum matrices by time period, mode, and trip purpose to calculate daily automobile VMT • Calculate automobile VMT for individual TAZs using marginal totals:
o Residential (home-based) - row of departure matrix plus column of return matrix o Office (home-based work) - column of departure matrix plus row of return matrix Appropriateness Checks
Regardless of which method is used, the number of vehicle trips from the custom PA to OD process and the total VMT should match as closely as possible with the results from the traditional model process. The estimated results should be checked against the results from a full model run to understand the degree of accuracy. Note that depending on how each model is setup, these custom processes may or may not include IX/XI trips, truck trips, or special generator trips (airport, seaport, stadium, etc.).

When calculating VMT for comparison at the study area, citywide, or regional geography, the same methodology that was used to estimate project-specific VMT should be used. The VMT for these comparisons can be easily calculated by aggregating the row or column totals for all zones that are within the desired geography.

Proposed New Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) ATTACHMENT 2
Redline of Exhibit A to Resolution No.
5010-2020
Attachment 2
Redline of Exhibit A to Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) ATTACHMENT 2
Redline of Exhibit A to Resolution No. 5010-2020
400206.1
Table 1
VMT Impact Thresholds
Methods Project Threshold Cumulative Threshold
Land Use Plans (such as General Plans and Specific Plans) • San Bernardino Traffic
Analysis Model (SBTAM)
forecast of total daily VMT/SP
• To capture project effect,
the same cumulative year
population and
employment growth totals
should be used. The
“project” only influences
land use allocation.

A significant impact would occur if
the project VMT/SP (for the land
use plan) exceeds the
[Countywide/Citywide] average
under General Plan Buildout
Conditions.

SCAG RTP/SCS
• Is the proposed project
within the growth
projections in the
RTP/SCS?
N/A A significant impact would occur if
the project is determined to be
inconsistent with the RTP/SCS.

Project presumption applies under
cumulative conditions as long as
project is consistent with SCAG
RTP/SCS.
• VMT analysis using SBTAM
forecast of total daily VMT/SP.

A significant impact would occur if
the project VMT/SP exceeds the
[Countywide/Citywide] average
under General Plan Buildout
Conditions.

A significant impact would occur if
the project is determined to be
inconsistent with the RTP/SCS.

Attachment 2
Redline of Exhibit A to Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) ATTACHMENT 2
Redline of Exhibit A to Resolution No. 5010-2020
400206.1
Table 1
VMT Impact Thresholds
Methods Project Threshold Cumulative Threshold
Transportation Projects (thresholds may apply for SB 743 of GHG purposes) • SBTAM forecast of total
citywide daily VMT1
A significant impact would occur if
the project increased the baseline
VMT within the City.

A significant impact would occur if
the project caused total daily VMT
within the City to be higher than
the no build alternative under
cumulative conditions.
• Consistency check with

Alternatively, iof the model is not deemed appropriate, Robert Cervero’s research on lanme-mile elasticity and its relationship to VMT can be referenced.

Attachment 2
Redline of Exhibit A to Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) ATTACHMENT 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020
Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 118
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 119
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 120
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 121
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 122
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 123
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 124
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 125
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 126
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 127
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 128
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 129
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 130
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 131
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 132
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 133
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 134
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 135
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 136
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 137
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 138
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 139
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 140
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 141
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 142
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 143
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 144
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 145
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 146
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 147
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 148
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 149
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 150
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 151
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 152
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 153
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 154
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 155
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 156
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 157
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 158
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 159
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 160
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 161
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Attachment 3
Original Resolution No. 5010-2020

14.a
Packet Pg. 162
Attachment: Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled (6024 : Resolution Vehicle Miles Traveled) Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30 PM
Finance
Brenna Chavez
Budget
Doc ID: 6022

COUNCIL RESOLUTION
AGENDA MATTER:

CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2025/2026 PROPOSED OPERATING AND

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET, APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT, INVESTMENT POLICY, AND THE

PUBLICLY AVAILABLE PAY SCHEDULE FOR BUDGETED POSITIONS AND NEWLY ADDED

POSITIONS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Operating and Capital Improvement Budget for the City and the Fire District Under the direction of the City Manager/Board Manager, staff have worked diligently to develop an Operating and Capital Improvement Budget for the City and an Operating Budget for the Fire District.

These proposed budgets recommended for your adoption represent the spending plans for the City and BFPD for Fiscal Year 2025/2026.

On May 14, and May 21, 2025, the City Council/District Board held a Budget Study Session and reviewed the Proposed Operating and Capital Improvement Budget for Fiscal Year 2025/2026. At this meeting, the Council/Board determined that their questions were sufficiently answered and no additional budget workshops were scheduled.

The Proposed Operating and Capital Improvement Budget for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 includes proposed appropriations for all funds with budgetary activity. This includes the General Fund and its sub-funds, Special Revenue Funds, Debt Service Funds, Capital Project Funds, Proprietary Funds, and Fiduciary Funds.

Appropriations Limit for the City of Barstow and Barstow Fire Protection District As per Section 7910 of the Government Code, each year the City of Barstow is required to adopt a resolution to establish its appropriation limit for the fiscal year. Pursuant to Article XIII B, such adoption must occur at a regularly scheduled meeting and the required documentation used to determine the appropriations is presented for review by the City Council and the public.

Investment Policy
The City Council must annually concur and adopt the City of Barstow’s Investment Policy. Presented for Council's consideration is the FY 2025/2026 Investment Policy.

Publicly Available Pay Schedule
The City of Barstow's governing body must approve a publicly available pay schedule (PAPS) in order to comply with the requirements of the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and the California Code of Regulations (CCR), Section 507.5.

DISCUSSION:
15 Packet Pg. 163
Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30 PM
Finance
Brenna Chavez
Budget
Doc ID: 6022

COUNCIL RESOLUTION
Proposed Operating and Capital Improvement Budget
The Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Proposed Operating and Capital Improvement Budget for the City and the Fire District totals $74,695,466. Estimated Revenues on an all funds basis is estimated at $75,922,340.

The proposed Operating Budget equals $65,997,720 which is an increase of $2,739,227 or 4.16% from the current 2024/2025 proposed budget. The proposed Capital Improvement Budget is projected at $8,697,746, an increase of 1361.32%.

Due to a change in management, projects budgeted in FY 2025/2026 were only those currently in progress from FY 2024/2025. Future capital improvements were brought to council in FY 25 for current approval and budgeted accordingly. Those projects and several new projects have been continued into FY 26 creating a current working capital projects budget. Additionally, the Capital Improvement Budget does not include capital projects that will be crossing from FY 2024/2025 into FY 2025/2026.

Carryforward amounts for these projects will be brought to the City Council for approval before the end of the calendar year.

The combined General Fund is projected to reflect a net increase in fund balance estimated at $686,129 during Fiscal Year 2025/2026.

Staff recommend the use of Measure Q Fund Balance to fund one-time capital and safety-related expenditures, which are not currently included in the proposed budget. Below is a list of capital needs which staff seeks direction from Council on the use of Measure Q Fund Balance. One non-capital item listed is for security at the Harvey House. This is recommended as a one-time expenditure to hire security on a single-year test basis, in an effort to revitalize the Harvey House office leasing and facility rental for events.

Requested Use of Measure Q Fund Balance
Measure Q Est. Fund Balance at 7/1/25 4,110,110
FY 26 Revenue 9,660,000
FY 26 Expenditures (10,315,918)
Available Fund Bal 3,454,192
Flock Cameras (PD) 343,500 Fogelsong Park Fields (2 - In/Out) 280,000 Personal Protective Equip + SCBA (Fire) 104,200 Fogelsong Concrete ADA Between Fields 35,000 Fire Hose Replacement 19,500 Eason Sr. Center ADA Restroom Upgrades 85,000 Facility Remodel (Fire) Stencil Truck 240,000 185,000
Battalion Chief Vehicles 60,000 Skim Patching 60,000
Building Improvements (PD) 60,000 Trash Pump 25,000
PW Cement Mixer and Apparatus 125,000 PW ADA Restroom Upgrades 35,000 Harvey House Boiler Pistols 125,000 60,000
Harvey House Security Bunker Rake (2) 100,000 50,000
Fogelsong Park ADA Walkway 14,500 City Cameras 750,000
2,756,700
Remaining Fund Balance 697,492
15 Packet Pg. 164
Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30 PM
Finance
Brenna Chavez
Budget
Doc ID: 6022

COUNCIL RESOLUTION
Key financial data has been excerpted from the proposed budget and presented below for both estimated revenues and appropriations for select funds and sub-funds as is detailed in the tables below.

General Fund Summary - 100
The proposed budget for 2025/2026 includes the utilization of total projected resources of $28,244,935, without any appropriation from fund balance. The proposed General Fund budget is balanced as presented and it is estimated that the General Fund will reflect an increase in fund balance as of the end of June, 2026. The breakdown of the proposed budget for both estimated revenues and appropriations is shown in the table below.

Fiscal Year Estimated Revenues Appropriations
2025/2026 $28,244,935 ($26,932,688)
General Fund (Measure Q Sub-Fund Summary) - 102
General Fund revenues received from Measure Q for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 are estimated to be approximately $9,660,000. General Fund appropriations funded by Measure Q are proposed at $10,315,918. This includes an appropriation from fund balance in the amount of $655,918.

Fiscal Year Estimated Revenues Appropriations
2025/2026 $9,660,000 ($10,315,918)
Fire District - 225
The proposed FY2025/2026 operating budget for the Barstow Fire Protection District fund is $6,538,500.

The Barstow Fire Protection District is also funded through the General Fund (Measure Q Sub Account 103 – Fire). Funding through this source totals $4,962,585. The total funding allocated to the firefighters and firefighting is $11,501,085 for FY 2025/2026. Additionally, $467,203 is expended from the Measure Q Sub Account 102 for payments related to the purchase of the new fire engine that was placed into service in FY 23, refurbishment of an existing engine in FY 22, and purchase of a hydraulic lift to service Fire Department apparatus in FY 22, and an additional fire engine financed in FY 25.

Staffing within the Fire District increased 40% (from 20 to 28 firefighters) after the passage of Measure Q in November, 2018. The Fire District’s proposed budget represents 41.0% of the estimated Measure Q revenues for FY 2025/2026. Together with the Police Department, 70.6% of the estimated Measure Q expenditures for FY 2025/2026 are directly for the purposes of supporting Public Safety. The proposed budget for the Fire District is detailed in the table that follows.

FY 24 Proposed Funding Estimated Revenues Appropriations Gen. Fund MQ Sub-Fund 103 $4,962,585 ($4,962,585)
BFPD Fund 225* $7,129,100 ($6,538,500)
Total Appropriation Request $12,091,685 ($11,501,085)
Surplus funds remaining unspent in FY 2025/2026 can be attributed to an additional payment to reduce the further accumulation of fund deficit for the Barstow Fire Protection District which totals $3,317,392 as of current. This does not include any amounts that will need to be recorded after the close of FY 25. The consideration of further funding to reduce the accumulation of the BFPD’s fund deficit will be further analyzed throughout the course of FY 26.
15 Packet Pg. 165
Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30 PM
Finance
Brenna Chavez
Budget
Doc ID: 6022

COUNCIL RESOLUTION
Special Revenue Funds
Special Revenue Funds are those funds which have restricted uses and for these reasons are accounted for in separate funds. The proposed 2025/2026 budget for Special Revenue Funds is detailed in the table that follows:

Fund Name Estimated Revenues Appropriations
COVID-19 446,672 (440,272)
Measure I / 2010-2040 1,759,300 (2,510,300)
Gas Tax 725,737 (6,900)
SB1 669,930 (1,216,788)
Comm. Dev. Block Grant (CDBG) 970,963 (977,306)
Grants – Reimbursable 2,562,514 (2,404,053)
Grants – Prefunded 95,112 (96,813)
Public Safety COPS Program 195,000 (190,500)
Odessa Water District 4,000 (4,000)
Barstow Harvey House Foundation (325)
Barstow Community Services
Foundation
(325)
Total Special Revenue Funds $7,429,228 ($7,847,582)
Debt Service
The Debt Service Fund is used to account for the revenues and expenditures associated with the Lease Revenue and the Pension Obligation Bonds.

Fiscal Year Estimated Revenues Appropriations
2025/2026 $2,667,031 ($2,667,027)
Wastewater
The proposed annual operating and capital improvement budget for Wastewater activities includes estimated revenues of $5,467,750 and an appropriation request of $5,129,730 for fiscal year 2025/2026.

As currently projected, the budgetary activities in the Wastewater Fund will result in a net increase in net position of just over $330,000. The proposed budget for the Wastewater Fund is as follows in the table below.

Fiscal Year Estimated Revenues Appropriations
2025/2026 $5,467,750 ($5,129,730)
Solid Waste
The proposed annual operating and capital improvement budget for Solid Waste activities includes estimated revenues of $6,594,700 and an appropriation request of $6,555,775 for FY 2025/2026. As currently projected, the budgetary activities in the Solid Waste Fund will result in a net increase in net position of $38,925 for FY 2025/2026. The proposed budget for the Solid Waste Fund is as follows in the table below.
15 Packet Pg. 166
Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30 PM
Finance
Brenna Chavez
Budget
Doc ID: 6022

COUNCIL RESOLUTION
Fiscal Year Estimated Revenues Appropriations
2025/2026 $6,594,700 ($6,555,775)
Capital Projects Fund
The Capital Project Fund includes multiyear and large scale projects funded by various funding sources and funds. These resources are both restricted and unrestricted in nature. The Capital Projects Fund estimated transfers in from various funding sources in the amount $8,697,746 and appropriation requests of $8,697,746. Staff would like to note that projects currently included in the FY 2024/2025 budget that are in progress or currently funded will be brought back for carryforward budget approval prior to the end of calendar year 2025. In order to determine carryforward amounts, all FY 2024/2025 invoices must be submitted and paid. Upon closure of FY 2024/2025 accounting periods, the carryforwards for all CIP projects that remain active will be brought back to the City Council for carryforward budget approval. The proposed budget for the Capital Project Fund is as follows in the table below.

Fiscal Year Estimated Revenues Appropriations
2025/2026 $8,697,746 ($8,697,746)
Fiduciary Funds
Fiduciary Funds are used to account for resources held for the benefit of parties outside of the municipality. These funds are not available to support the City’s own programs. The Landscape & Lighting Maintenance Districts Fund accounts for the receipts and disbursements of special assessments.

The RDA Dissolution Trust Fund accounts for the activities of the redevelopment successor agency. The proposed 2025/2026 budget for Fiduciary Funds is as follows in the table below Fund Name Estimated Revenues Appropriations
Landscape & Lighting
Maintenance Districts $21,500 ($10,500)
RDA Dissolution Trust $6,000 $0
Investment Policy
The attached Investment Policy outlines the purposes and objectives of the City of Barstow's investment of cash not needed for current obligations. Per California Government Code Section 53646(a) et seq., the Investment Policy for the City of Barstow is presented to the Council for concurrence and adoption.

This policy must be adopted each year pursuant to Section 53607 of the Government Code. City Treasurer, Michael Lewis, has reviewed and approved the proposed Investment Policy for FY 2025/2026.

There were no changes of note to the policy from last fiscal year.

Appropriations Limit City of Barstow
The City of Barstow is required to annually calculate its appropriations limit. The calculation must be approved by the City Council each fiscal year. For FY 2025/2026, the Appropriations Limit (also known as the Gann Limit) is $59,756,788. The City of Barstow’s net proceeds of taxes are subject to the limit of $28,778,122; thereby, the City of Barstow is $30,978,666 under its limit for this period.

Appropriations Limit Barstow Fire Protection District
Annually, the Barstow Fire Protection District is required to calculate their appropriations limit. The 15 Packet Pg. 167
Joint Special Council/BFPD
06/17/25 05:30 PM
Finance
Brenna Chavez
Budget
Doc ID: 6022

COUNCIL RESOLUTION
calculation must be approved by the Board. For FY 2025/2026, the Appropriations Limit is $10,115,604.

The Barstow Fire Protection District is $4,175,604 under its limit for this period.

Publicly Available Pay Schedule (PAPS)
The PAPS is available on the City of Barstow's website. The PAPS will be brought before the City Council any time a revision or modification is required. The FY 25/26 PAPS being presented to the City Council for approval is compliant with the aforementioned requirements of CalPERS and will become effective on July 1, 2025. The PAPS also includes the positions that are being presented tonight with the FY 2025- 2026 Budget within the Police Department Administrative Division, Community Service Officer, and the Barstow Fire Protection District, Firefighter EMT update.

FISCAL IMPACT:

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

That the City Council and Barstow Fire Protection District Board take the following actions:

1. That City Council approve the Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Proposed Operating and Capital Improvement Budget for the City in the amount of $68,156,966 and adopt the attached Joint Resolution No.

XXXX-2025 (Attachment B), approving the Proposed Budget (Attachment A), including any City Council amendments (if any), and excluding the Barstow Fire Protection District Budget – Fund 225, and waive the full reading.

4. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. XXXX-2025 approving the publicly available pay schedule (PAPS) (Attachment C)

5. That the City Council Adopt the Investment Policy and Resolution No. XXXX-2025 of the City of Barstow for FY 2025/2026.

6. Provide direction to staff for the use of Measure Q Fund Balance for one-time safety related expenditures.
15 Packet Pg. 168

15.a
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD)

15.a
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) City of Barstow
List of Elected and Appointed Officials
June 30, 2025
Elected Officials
Mayor Timothy R. Silva
Mayor Pro Tem Barbara Mae Rose
Council Member James M. Noble
Council Member John Williams
Council Member Carmen Hernandez
City Treasurer Michael J. Lewis
City Clerk Andrea Flores
Appointed Officials
City Manager Rochelle Clayton
City Attorney Matthew Summers

15.a
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) This page was intentionally left blank.

15.a
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD)

HISTORY OF BARSTOW
More than 2,000 years ago, the
Mojave Desert had been
occupied by Indian tribes who
lived beside the immense lakes
that covered most of the Mojave.

In the late 1800s, the Barstow
area became a mining center.

Daggett, 5 miles downriver, was
founded in the 1860s. It was
originally called Calico Junction
but was renamed after California
Lieutenant Governor John
Daggett when silver was
discovered 6 miles north in the
Calico Mountains in 1882.

The finding of silver in Calico and the building of the Southern Pacific Railroad from Mojave to Daggett in 1882 made the area a mining center. The famous 20-mule teams came into being when 10 teams were hitched together with two wagons and a water wagon to haul ore from Daggett to the town of Calico.

The Calico Railroad (later called the Daggett-Calico Railroad) started hauling ore from Calico to the Oro Grande Milling Company, across the river from Daggett in 1888. That same year, the Santa Fe Railroad arrived in town. The town was later named after the president of the Santa Fe, William Barstow Strong. The mine shut down in 1896 when all the silver had played out.

But in 1883, the borax rush hit Calico, and by 1902, three borax mines employing 200 men supported Daggett. As the 20th century progressed, Calico and Daggett diminished while Barstow grew. It became a busy rail center and a jumping off place for immigrants entering the state on US Route 66, as made famous by John Steinbeck's novel "The Grapes of Wrath." Modern and historic facilities are still available along Barstow's Main Street, the original Route 66. Just off Main Street, at First Street, travelers can drive over an old iron bridge that leads to the railroad depot once the site of the historic Harvey House, originally opened in 1911.

Today, Barstow spans approximately 40 square miles and is a centrally located midway between Los Angeles and Las Vegas. Incorporated in 1947, Barstow is home to approximately 25,000 residents. Located at the convergence of Interstate 15 and Interstate 40 and the intersections of Highways 58 and 247, Barstow has become the transportation hub of the west.
1 15.a
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD)

DESCRIPTION OF FUNDS & FUND TYPES

GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
Governmental funds are used to account for most, if not all, of a government’s tax-supported activities. The general fund, special revenues funds, debt service funds, and capital projects funds are considered governmental funds.

GENERAL FUND
GENERAL FUND - 100: The General Fund is the primary operating fund of the City. All general tax revenues and other receipts that are not allocated by law or contractual agreement to some other fund are accounted for in this fund. It accounts for all financial resources of the general government, except those required to be accounted for and reported in another fund. General Fund sub-funds revenues and expenditures for funds 102, 103 and 104 are also recorded within the General Fund. Activity within these funds are segregated as sub-funds for management reporting purposes only.

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Special Revenue Funds are used to account for proceeds of specific sources (other than for major capital projects) that are legally restricted to expenditure for specified purposes.

COVID – 19 FUND – 202: This fund accounts for funds received as a result of the COVID-19 pandemics. The funding sources include the Justice Assistance Program (JAG) Grant, Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, and the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). COVID-19 Federal grant monies are administered by both the Federal government and the County of San Bernardino.

MEASURE I – 2010/2040 FUND - 209: This fund accounts for the money generated by the one-half percent sales tax approved by the voters in 1989. The vote in 1989 approved Measure I sales tax through 2010. In 2004, San Bernardino County voters approved the extension of Measure I sales tax through 2040. Measure I funds are dedicated for transportation planning, design, construction, operations, and maintenance of public roadways.

GAS TAX FUND (STREET MAINTENANCE) – 210: This fund accounts for the receipts and expenditures of money apportioned by the State Highway Code sections’ 2105, 2106, 2107 and 2107.5. Gas tax monies are restricted in use and can only be used to construct and maintain streets and highways.

SENATE BILL 1 (SB1) FUND – 211: Signed into law on April 28, 2017, Senate Bill 1 (SB1) created the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program (RMRP) whose funds are dedicated to fix roads, freeways, and bridges, while also funding transit and safety projects. SB1 funding also assists agencies to improve aging infrastructure, improve road conditions, active transportation (alternative transportation methods, such as walking and bicycling), and health and safety benefits by redirecting traffic off of roadways which reduces air pollution, curtails traffic congestion and improves safety. Additionally, eligible expenditures under the RMRP include road maintenance and rehabilitation, safety projects, railroad grade separations, pedestrian and bicycle safety projects, transit facilities, drainage and storm water capture projects in conjunction with other allowable projects, and traffic control devices.

MOJAVE DESERT AQMD FUND - 212: This fund accounts for local expenditure of funds from the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District.

ASSET SEIZURE FUND - 214: The Asset Seizure fund is used to account for forfeited assets to the City of Barstow by court decisions due to asset seizures resulting from drug/gang related police investigations. Forfeited assets must be used in support of drug/gang related enforcement or prevention activities. 2 15.a
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND – 215: This fund accounts for revenues received from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) which are to be expended for approved Federal Housing and Community Development Act projects. These revenues must be expended to accomplish one of the following objectives: elimination of slum or blight, benefit low and moderate income persons, or to meet certain urgent community development needs.

GRANTS – REIMBURSABLE FUND – 217: This fund accounts for transactions related to proceeds from federal, state, and other grants restricted for various purposes specified within the respected grant agreements. Grant funding accounted for within this fund is tracked on a reimbursable basis.

GRANTS – PREFUNDED FUND - 218: This fund accounts for transactions related to proceeds from grants restricted for various purposes specified in the respective grant agreements. Currently, the grant fund tracks expenditures related to the State Beverage Litter Grant, State of CA Cannabis Equity Act, and CAL OES Generator Project. Funds accounted for in Fund 218 are prefunded grants.

PUBLIC SAFETY COPS PROGRAM FUND - 219: This fund accounts for revenue received from the State of California for the Public Safety COPS Program. In 1997, the California State Legislature created the Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) Program, which is a noncompetitive grant where cities receive state funds to augment public safety expenditures. Funds must be used to benefit front-line law enforcement efforts. The minimum grant allocation for FY 23/24 is $100K.

BARSTOW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT (BFPD) FUND – 225: The Barstow Fire Protection District (BFPD) became a component unit of the City on November 17, 2010. Prior to this date, the District was an independent district. The District will continue to be operated according to the applicable state fire protection district laws and the property taxes collected within the district will be used exclusively for the administration and operational costs of the district. The City Council acts as the District's governing board and exerts significant influence over its operations. Separate financial statements are produced for the District. The Fire District is accounted for as a component unit of the City of Barstow.

ODESSA WATER DISTRICT FUND – 230: This fund accounts for financial activities of the water district.

Established on July 5, 1993, pursuant to the legislation approved by the State in 1991, the District was founded to provide water resources to the City. The City Council acts as the District's governing board and exerts significant influence over its operations. The City is responsible for Odessa's obligations. Separate financial statements are produced annually. The Water District is accounted for as a component unit of the City of Barstow.

BARSTOW HARVEY HOUSE FOUNDATION FUND – 232: Established on January 16, 1992, the Foundation was formed to promote development of the historical Harvey House, to improve, renovate, and maintain the historic significance of the site. The City Council acts as the Foundation's governing board. The City is responsible for the Foundation's obligations. Separate financial statements are not produced for the Foundation.

BARSTOW COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION FUND - 233: Formed on October 7, 2013, as a non-profit public benefit corporation, the Foundation was formed to receive, invest and utilize funds and property acquired through the solicitation of contributions, donations, grants, gifts, bequests for the purposes of fostering and promoting community interests, events, and programs promoting and celebrating Barstow, its history and contributions, and any other purpose beneficial to the public. The City Council serves as the Foundation's governing board. The City is responsible for the Foundation's obligations. Separate financial statements are not produced for the Foundation.

LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND (LTF) – 235: The Local Transportation Fund (LTF) is a funding source established by the Transportation Development Act (TDA) of 1971 which provides funding to be allocated to transit and non-transit related purposes that comply with regional transportation plans, such as streets and roads, construction and maintenance. LTF is derived from a 1/4 cent of the general sales tax collected statewide which is returned by the State Board of Equalization to each County which allocates the LTF funds within the County based on population.
3 15.a
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD)

DESCRIPTION OF FUNDS & FUND TYPES

DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
TOTAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TRIP) FUND – 301: The Measure I Total Road Improvement Program (TRIP) is used to account for the reserve amount held for the Certificates of Participation, Series 2012, which were used to finance the design, acquisition, and construction of certain local roadway improvements and street resurfacing projects within the City. TRIP was paid off in full in FY 21.

DEBT SERVICE FUND – 302: Debt Service Funds are generally used to accumulate financial resources that are restricted, committed, or assigned for future debt service payments. This fund was established to accumulate financial resources restricted for lease revenue and pension obligations bond payments for bonds issued during the 2021-2022 Fiscal Year.

CUSTODIAL FUNDS
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PID) 91-1 - 516: Public Improvement District (PID) 91-1 accounts for the receipt of assessments relating to Public Improvement District 91-1 and the disposition of the assessments under the terms of the agreement.

LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT – 530: The Landscape & Lighting Maintenance District Fund accounts for the receipt of tax roll assessments and disposition of the assessments under the terms of the agreement. Agreements relate to developments, whether residential or commercial, where landscape and/or lighting is maintained by the City as a result of the development.

CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND - 400: This fund was established to account for all of the City’s construction projects that are not being separately accounted for in other capital project funds (with the exception of those funded through nonmajor capital project funds and some Enterprise Fund projects). Financing is provided primarily through transfers in from the General Fund, and from State and Federal grants.

DEVELOPMENT FUND – 425: The Development Fund is used to account for revenue collected through Development Impact Fees (DIF). These funds are collected during the building permit process and funds can only be used in the areas in which they are collected. The fund also tracks DIF-related expenditures.

PROPRIETARY FUNDS
WASTEWATER RECLAMATION (WWTP) FUND – 605: The Wastewater Reclamation Fund accounts for the operation of the wastewater system, which is a self-supporting activity which renders services on a user charge basis to residents and businesses located in the City. The wastewater system and plant are operated by the City and its employees. All revenue generated are used to offset the cost of running the wastewater facility and sewer infrastructure.

SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FUND – 650: The Solid Waste Disposal Fund is used to account for the operation of the Solid Waste (trash) utility, a self-supporting activity which renders services on a user charge basis to residents and businesses located in the City. The components collected within the fee structure for solid waste include the hauler fee, AB939, landfill fee, administration, franchise fee, and organics processing. 4 15.a
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD)

DESCRIPTION OF FUNDS & FUND TYPES

TRUST FUNDS
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (RDA) DISSOLUTION TRUST FUND – 801: This fund accounts for the activities of the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Dissolution Trust. The trust is set up specifically for managing the activities associated with dissolution of the former RDA. On January 17, 2012, the City Council elected to become the successor agency to the RDA. The successor agency has fulfilled all of the obligations of the former RDA during FY 2022-2023.
5 15.a
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) THE CITY’S FLOW OF FUNDS STRUCTURE
__________________________________________________________ REVENUE SOURCES:

Property Tax Measure I Cost Allocation Charges
Sales Tax Gas Tax Operating Transfers In
Transient Occupancy Tax Local Transportation Fund Fees and Charges Other Taxes TRIP Revenue from Other Agencies
Licenses & Permits HSIP Miscellaneous Grants
Fines & Forfeitures CDBG
Fees & Charges Miscellaneous Grants
Revenue from Other Agencies
CITY’S GENERAL FUND CAPITAL FUNDS OTHER FUNDS
USES OF FUNDS:

General Operating Expenditures Infrastructure Maintenance & Replacement (Including Debt Service Obligations) Repairs/Maintenance/Improvement of Sewer Transmission Lines Permanent Facilities Solid Waste Disposal
Environmental Facilities Feasibility Studies and Design 6 15.a
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) # of Positions Position % Authorized Budgeted Salary
Authorized of FTE FTE's FTE's Range
Department: City Council
Mayor 1.00 50% 0.50 0.50 NR
Council Members 4.00 50% 2.00 2.00 NR
City Treasurer 1.00 50% 0.50 0.50 NR
City Clerk 1.00 50% 0.50 0.50 NR
Total Council: 7.00 3.50 3.50 NR
Department: City Manager Office
City Manager 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 002
Assistant City Manager 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 12400/12340
Administrative Services Director 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11750/11690 Assistant to the City Manager 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11750/11690 Human Resources Manager 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11920/11860 Senior Administrative Analyst 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11700/11640 Information Technology Manager 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11920/11860 Information Technology Coordinator 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11700/11640 Information Technology Technician 3.00 100% 3.00 3.00 11320/11260 City Clerk Services Manager 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 12020/11960 Administrative Assistant 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11320/11260 Total City Manager: 13.00 13.00 13.00
Department: Community Development
Community Development Director 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 12380/12320 Community Development Manager 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 12020/11960 Economic Development Specialist 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11850/11790 Administrative Analyst 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11600/11540
Senior Community Development Inspector 2.00 100% 2.00 2.00 11700/11640 Community Development Inspector I 2.00 100% 2.00 2.00 11470/11410 Administrative Assistant 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11320/11260 Office Assistant 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11170/11110
Code Compliance Supervisor 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11570/11510 Code Compliance Officer 5.00 100% 5.00 5.00 11220/11160 Total Community Development: 16.00 16.00 16.00
Department: Community Services
Public Works Superintendent 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11850/11790 Field Services Supervisor 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11570/11510 Field Public Services Assistant I 6.00 100% 6.00 6.00 11120/11060 Field Public Services Assistant II 4.00 100% 4.00 4.00 11220/11160 Facility Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11570/11510 Facility Public Services Assistant II 2.00 100% 2.00 2.00 11220/11160 Facility Public Services Assistant III 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11320/11260 Parks & Open Space Supervisor 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11570/11510 Parks Public Services Assistant I 4.00 100% 4.00 4.00 11120/11060 Parks Public Services Assistant II 2.00 100% 2.00 2.00 11220/11160 Parks Public Services Assistant III 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11320/11260 Fleet Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11680/11620 Fleet Mechanic 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11420/11360
Senior Fleet Mechanic 2.00 100% 2.00 2.00 11470/11410
Total Community Services: 28.00 28.00 28.00

CITY OF BARSTOW
Master Staffing Plan FY 2025-2026
Job Classification
Salary Range is listed as Tier I/Tier II

15.a
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) # of Positions Position % Authorized Budgeted Salary
Authorized of FTE FTE's FTE's Range

CITY OF BARSTOW
Master Staffing Plan FY 2025-2026
Job Classification
Department: Community Services - Parks
Recreation Activity Coordinator 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11570/11510 Recreation Program Coordinator 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11420/11360 Office Assistant 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11170/11110
PT - Pool Manager 1.00 50% 0.50 0.50 10800
PT - Senior Recleader/Senior Lifeguard 2.00 50% 1.00 1.00 10580 PT - Recleader/Lifeguard 29.00 50% 14.50 14.50 10460
Total Community Services - Parks: 35.00 19.00 19.00
Department: Environmental Services
Wastewater Treatment Plant Superintendent 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11850/11790 Lead Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11570/11510 Wastewater Mechanic 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11420/11360
Senior Wastewater Mechanic 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11470/11410 Senior WW Treatment Plant Operator 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11320/11260 WW Treatment Plant Operator 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11220/11160 WW Treatment Plant Operator (In Training) 5.00 100% 5.00 5.00 11120/11060 Administrative Analyst (Waste Management) 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11600/11540 Total Environmental Services: 12.00 12.00 12.00
Department: Finance Department
Finance Director 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 12380/12320
Assistant Finance Director 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 12020/11960 Principal Accountant 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11890/11830
Accountant 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11750/11690
Accounting Technician 4.00 100% 4.00 4.00 11320/11260
Office Assistant 2.00 100% 2.00 2.00 11170/11110
Total Finance Department: 10.00 10.00 10.00
Department: Police Department
Police Chief 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 12420/12360
Police Captain 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 12170/12110
Police Lieutenant 2.00 100% 2.00 2.00 12090/12030
Police Sergeant 5.00 100% 5.00 5.00 11920/11860
Police Corporal 5.00 100% 5.00 5.00 11700/11640
Police Detective 2.00 100% 2.00 2.00 11700/11640
Police Officer 28.00 100% 28.00 28.00 11600/11540
Police Officer - School Resource Officer 2.00 100% 2.00 2.00 11600/11540 Community Service Officer 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11320/11260 Senior Administrative Assistant 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11420/11360 Police Services Supervisor 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11700/11640 Senior Dispatcher 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11420/11360
Dispatcher 10.00 100% 10.00 10.00 11320/11260
Police Services Assistant 4.00 100% 4.00 4.00 11220/11160 Senior Crime Scene Evidence Technician 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11520/11460 Crime Scene Evidence Technician 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11320/11260 Total Police Department: 66.00 66.00 66.00
Department: Fire Department
Fire Chief 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 12320
Fire Battalion Chief 3.00 100% 3.00 3.00 11880
Fire Captain 6.00 100% 6.00 6.00 11800
Fire Engineer 6.00 100% 6.00 6.00 11580
Firefighter/Paramedic 9.00 100% 9.00 9.00 11480
Firefighter/EMT 3.00 100% 3.00 3.00 11480
Office Assistant 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11170/11110
Fire Inspector / Arson Investigator 1.00 100% 1.00 1.00 11420/11360 Total Fire Department: 30.00 30.00 30.00
Totals 217.00 197.50 197.50
Salary Range is listed as Tier I/Tier II

15.a
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) FY 2022-2023 FY 2023-2024 FY 2024-2025 FY 2025-2026
Actual FTE's Actual FTE's Actual FTE's Proposed FTE's
Department: Elected Officials
Mayor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
City Council Member 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
City Treasurer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
City Clerk 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total Council: 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00
Department: City Manager Office
City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Public Information Officer 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Administrative Services Director 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Economic Development Director 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Assistant to the City Manager 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Human Resources Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Analyst/Sr. Administrative Analyst 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Information Technology Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Information Technology Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Information Technology Technician 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
City Clerk Services Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Assistant 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Total City Manager Office: 15.00 14.00 13.00 13.00
Department: Community Development
Community Development Director 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
City Building Official/Fire Marshal 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Community Development Manager 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Planning & Community Development Administrator 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Economic Development Specialist 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Assistant/Sr. Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Office Assistant/Sr. Office Assistant 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineering Services Administrator 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Comm. Dev. Inspector/Sr. Building Inspector 6.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Code Compliance Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Code Compliance Officer 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Total Community Development: 20.00 16.00 16.00 16.00
City of Barstow
4 Year Personnel Summary
Job Classification

15.a
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) FY 2022-2023 FY 2023-2024 FY 2024-2025 FY 2025-2026
Actual FTE's Actual FTE's Actual FTE's Proposed FTE's
City of Barstow
4 Year Personnel Summary
Job Classification
Department: Community Services
Public Works Superintendent 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parks & Open Space Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Field Services Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Field Public Services Assistant III (Street) 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Field Public Services Assistant I/II (Street) 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 Facility Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Facility Public Services Assistant III (Building/Open Space) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Facility Public Services Assistant I/II (Building/Open Space) 9.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 Fleet Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fleet Mechanic/Sr. Mechanic 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
PT - Maintenance Worker 4.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Total Community Services: 35.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Department: Community Services - Parks
Parks & Recreation Superintendent 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Recreation Activity Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Recreation Program Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PT - Recleader/Lifeguard
Total Community Services - Parks: 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Department: Environmental Services
General Manager Environmental Services 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wastewater Treatment Plant Superintendent 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lead Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Wastewater Mechanic/Sr. Wastewater Mechanic 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 WW Treatment Plant Operator/Sr. WW Treatment Plant Op 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Administrative Analyst (Waste Management) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Total Environmental Services 13.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Department: Finance Department
Finance Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Services Manager 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Assistant Finance Director 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Principal Accountant 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Analyst/ Sr. Administrative Analyst 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Accounting Technician/Sr. Accounting Technician 5.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Office Assistant 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00
Total Finace Development: 8.00 9.00 11.00 10.00

15.a
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) FY 2022-2023 FY 2023-2024 FY 2024-2025 FY 2025-2026
Actual FTE's Actual FTE's Actual FTE's Proposed FTE's
City of Barstow
4 Year Personnel Summary
Job Classification
Department: Police Department
Police Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Captain 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Lieutenant 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Police Sergeant 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Police Corporal 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Police Detective 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Police Officer 29.00 28.00 28.00 28.00
Police Officer - School Resource Officer 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 Sr. Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Services Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sr. Dispatcher 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Dispatcher 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Community Service Officer 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Animal Control Officer 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Police Services Assistant/Sr. Police Services Assistant 5.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Crime Scene Evidence Techincian/Sr. Crime Scene Evidence Tech 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Total Police Department: 67.00 66.00 66.00 66.00
Department: Fire Department
Fire Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fire Battalion Chief 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Fire Captain 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Fire Engineer 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Firefighter/Paramedic 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Firefighter/EMT 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Office Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fire Inspector/Arson Investigator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total Fire Department: 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Totals 199.00 187.00 188.00 187.00

15.a
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 12 15.a
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26

PROPERTY TAXES-SEC/UNSEC
100.401.111.110 PROPERTY TAXES 1,121,905 1,203,267 1,120,000 1,100,000 98.2% 1,295,000 100.401.111.112 PARK-PROPERTY TAX 743,414 795,698 775,000 762,000 98.3% 828,500 100.401.111.113 RDA RESIDUAL TAX PAYMENT 685,050 807,214 600,000 805,000 134.2% 865,000 100.401.111.118 PARKS-RDA RESIDUAL TAX PAYMENT 423,729 499,413 450,000 489,000 108.7% 546,500 100.401.111.122 VLF SWAP-TAX CODE 97.70 2,604,987 2,845,150 2,850,000 2,987,111 104.8% 3,287,000 Total - Property Taxes-Sec/Unsec 5,579,085 6,150,742 5,795,000 6,143,111 106.0% 6,822,000

SALES & USE TAX
100.406.210.120 SALES & USE TAX 8,610,923 8,370,862 7,855,095 7,855,095 100.0% 8,149,770 100.406.210.130 SB509/PUBLIC SAFETY 249,245 241,450 225,000 220,000 97.8% 226,000 Total - Local Taxes 8,860,168 8,612,312 8,080,095 8,075,095 99.9% 8,375,770

TRANSIENT LODGING TAXES
100.410.230.141 TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX 4,574,566 3,938,914 4,500,000 3,130,950 69.6% 3,986,000 100.410.230.142 TRANS OCCUPANCY PENALTY/INT 16,892 23,423 10,000 10,000 100.0% 12,000 Total - Transient Lodging Taxes 4,591,458 3,962,337 4,510,000 3,140,950 69.6% 3,998,000

FRANCHISES
100.411.220.131 FRANCHISE-TIME WARNER CABLE 181,380 149,281 150,000 140,000 93.3% 148,500 100.411.220.132 FRANCHISE-GOLDEN STATE WATER 98,564 113,445 115,000 134,672 117.1% 138,000 100.411.220.133 FRANCHISE-SW GAS & PG&E 81,398 111,237 110,000 103,200 93.8% 112,000 100.411.220.134 FRANCHISE-SO CALIF EDISON 364,920 399,851 385,000 385,000 100.0% 445,000 100.411.220.135 FRANCHISE-CAL NEV PIPELINE (KINDER) 8,970 - 1,000 - 0.0% - 100.411.220.136 FRANCHISE-BURRTEC SOLID WASTE 52,936 55,287 48,000 39,000 81.3% 48,000 100.411.220.137 FRANCHISE-WATER RECLAMATION - - - - #DIV/0! - 100.411.220.138 FRANCHISE TOWING 900 100 1,000 900 90.0% 1,000 100.411.220.139 FRANCHISE-MUNIS SOLID WASTE 343,998 384,997 400,000 375,000 93.8% 400,000 100.411.220.140 FRANCHISE-MUNIS WATER RECLAMATION 196,844 207,491 210,000 180,000 85.7% 210,000 Total - Franchises 1,329,910 1,421,689 1,420,000 1,357,772 95.6% 1,502,500

BUSINESS LICENSE TAXES
100.412.250.171 BUSINESS LICENSE 156,165 174,776 150,000 160,000 106.7% 172,500 100.412.250.172 BUSINESS LICENSE PENALTY/INT 6,097 8,043 5,000 7,000 140.0% 7,500 100.412.250.173 BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL FEES 25,623 27,007 20,000 24,000 120.0% 25,750 100.412.250.174 BUSINESS LIC PROCESSING FEE 13,336 16,789 11,000 13,500 122.7% 14,500 100.412.250.177 TECHNOLOGY FEE 22,383 34,537 21,000 18,000 85.7% 25,500 100.412.250.178 SB1186 ADA ACCESS & EDUCATION 5,026 5,508 3,000 5,000 166.7% 5,500 Total - Business License Taxes 228,629 266,661 210,000 227,500 108.3% 251,250

REAL PROPERTY TRANSFER TAXES
100.413.240.160 PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX 87,730 68,629 75,000 65,000 86.7% 70,500 Total - Real Property Transfer Taxes 87,730 68,629 75,000 65,000 86.7% 70,500

SUPPLEMENT TAX CURRENT
100.431.111.114 SUPPLEMENT TAX - CURRENT 52,979 43,341 24,800 48,000 193.5% 53,500 Total - Supplement Tax Current 52,979 43,341 24,800 48,000 193.5% 53,500

SUPPLEMENT TAX PRIOR
100.433.111.115 SUPPLEMENT TAX - PRIOR YEAR (1,198) 37,296 33,000 32,000 97.0% 35,000 Total - Supplement Tax Prior (1,198) 37,296 33,000 32,000 97.0% 35,000

CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
100.503.310.221 BUILDING PERMITS 231,090 144,437 150,000 174,500 116.3% 210,000 100.503.311.222 PLUMBING PERMITS 5,824 4,097 3,500 4,000 114.3% 5,200 100.503.312.223 ELECTRICAL PERMITS 3,539 3,026 3,500 3,000 85.7% 4,000 100.503.313.224 HEAT/AIR CONDITIONING PERMIT 4,503 3,550 4,500 3,000 66.7% 4,500 100.503.317.227 LOCAL GOVERNMENT RETAINER 116 71 100 100 100.0% 100 100.503.317.228 SEISMIC ACCT (STRONG MOTION) 188 96 200 100 50.0% 100 100.503.318.229 GRADING PERMIT 1,281 2,077 2,000 1,000 50.0% 2,800 100.503.318.235 MISC CONSTRUCTION FEES 1,446 2,276 2,000 1,500 75.0% 2,035 100.503.318.236 RE-INSPECTION FEES 48 - 1,000 650 65.0% 800 100.503.318.237 INSPECTION OUTSIDE BUSINESS HOURS 23,584 14,781 9,500 15,000 157.9% 16,650 100.503.318.238 INVESTIGATION FEES 4,491 5,031 1,000 500 50.0% 1,500 100.503.318.239 INSPECTION FEE 8,347 5,316 4,000 6,000 150.0% 8,500 100.503.318.240 FIRE PREVENTION MOU/CONSTRUCTION PERM 32,798 24,567 20,000 20,000 100.0% 24,000 100.503.318.241 FIRE PREVENTION MOU/ANNUAL OP PERMITS 96,175 119,830 75,000 90,000 120.0% 96,000 Total - Construction Permits 413,430 329,155 276,300 319,350 115.6% 376,185

STREET & CURB PERMITS
100.504.321.240 STREET/CURB PERMIT 78,178 44,887 40,000 49,000 122.5% 52,000 Total - Street & Curb Permits 78,178 44,887 40,000 49,000 122.5% 52,000

OTHER LICENSES/PERMITS-ALARM
100.506.322.293 ALARM PERMIT 4,774 5,136 5,000 3,900 78.0% 5,500 Total - Other Licenses/Permits-Alarm 4,774 5,136 5,000 3,900 78.0% 5,500

OTHER LICENSES/PERMITS-TRANSPORTATION
100.507.323.294 TRANSPORTATION PERMIT 3,714 2,549 3,000 3,500 116.7% 3,500 Total - Other Licenses/Permits-Transportation 3,714 2,549 3,000 3,500 116.7% 3,500

OTHER LICENSES/PERMITS-BINGO GAME
100.508.324.295 BINGO GAME PERMIT 300 625 300 150 50.0% 300 100.508.324.297 BANNER PERMITS 75 425 250 175 70.0% 350 Total - Other Licenses/Permits-Bingo Game 375 1,050 550 325 59.1% 650

RENTAL INSPECTION SERVICES
100.509.325.298 RENTAL INSPECTION SERVICES 57,120 95,620 141,000 160,000 113.5% 175,000 Total - Rental Inspection Services 57,120 95,620 141,000 160,000 113.5% 175,000 GENERAL FUND REVENUE 100
13 15.a
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD)

VEHICLE CODE FINES
100.510.410.310 COUNTY-SUPERIOR COURT FINES 26,710 29,651 10,000 12,500 125.0% 15,000 100.510.410.311 PD PHOENIX CITATIONS 269 - 500 1,800 360.0% 2,200 100.510.410.312 PD FINES Collection 2,090 219 13,000 18,000 138.5% 20,000 100.510.410.313 STATE CITATION COLLECTION REV 19,034 3,857 7,500 4,500 60.0% 5,000 100.510.410.314 COUNTY-CVC FINES POST 47,281 55,371 102,000 105,000 102.9% 115,000 Total - Vehicle Code Fines 95,384 89,098 133,000 141,800 106.6% 157,200

OTHER FINES
100.511.420.330 CODE ENFORCEMENT FINES 10,171 6,358 5,000 6,800 136.0% 7,500 100.511.420.331 ADMIN LIEN FINES & ADMIN CHGS 25,846 22,415 14,500 15,500 106.9% 17,500 100.511.420.340 EXCESSIVE ALARM FINES 13,450 2,125 5,000 100 2.0% 100 100.511.420.345 HUMANE SOCIETY VIOLATIONS 800 - - - #DIV/0! -
Total - Other Fines 50,267 30,897 24,500 22,400 91.4% 25,100

INVESTMENT EARNINGS
100.514.110.410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 129,827 219,148 - 100,000 #DIV/0! 125,000 100.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS/INVESTMENTS (56,229) 44,844 - 16,000 #DIV/0! 10,000 100.514.510.422 GASB 87 - INTEREST REVENUE 3,620 2,605 - - #DIV/0! - Total - Investment Earnings 77,218 266,597 - 116,000 #DIV/0! 135,000

USE OF PROPERTY
100.515.514.430 RENT - AMERIGAS 3,026 12,000 12,000 12,000 100.0% 12,000 100.515.514.431 UNION BANK RENT 5,455 5,001 5,400 5,000 92.6% 5,000 100.515.514.432 COMMUNITY CENTER RENT 20,210 18,945 15,000 10,000 66.7% 10,000 100.515.514.433 DANA PARK BUILDING RENT 1,100 2,000 1,000 1,000 100.0% 2,000 100.515.514.435 HENDERSON POOL RENTAL 8,134 2,820 5,000 2,000 40.0% 3,000 100.515.514.436 PARKS-ELECTRICITY RENTAL - 1,898 1,500 - 0.0% - 100.515.514.438 SP-BATTING CAGE/EQUIP RENTAL 900 568 500 20 4.0% 50 100.515.514.440 SPORTSPARK FACILITY RENTAL 8,193 8,625 10,000 8,000 80.0% 8,000 100.515.514.441 PARKS-WATER RENTAL - 150 - - #DIV/0!
-
100.515.514.442 PARKS-TOURNAMENT RENTAL 193 - - - #DIV/0! - 100.515.514.443 SPRTSPRK FCLTY/ LGHT RNTL - BLL BASEBALL 4,533 - 2,500 - 0.0% -
100.515.514.444 SPRTSPRK FCLTY/ LGHT RNTL - BLL SOFTBALL 5,007 - 2,500 - 0.0% - 100.515.514.445 HARVEY HOUSE LEASES 91,435 106,519 46,500 75,000 161.3% 100,000 100.515.514.447 HARVEY HOUSE FACILITY RENTAL 18,450 14,185 8,000 15,000 187.5% 23,000 100.515.514.448 HELIPAD RENTAL 37,636 38,765 39,000 37,000 94.9% 40,000 100.515.514.449 SPRTSPRK FCLTY/ LGHT RNTL - SOCCER 15,408 - 10,000 - 0.0% - 100.515.514.450 GASB 87 - LEASE CONTRA ACCT (2,539) (2,374) 2,500 - 0.0% - 100.515.514.451 SPRTSPRK FCLTY/ LGHT RNTL-TRAVEL SOCCE 3,883 - - - #DIV/0! -
Total - Use of Property 221,022 209,102 161,400 165,020 102.2% 203,050

MOTOR VEHICLE IN-LIEU TAX
100.519.610.520 MOTOR VEHICLE IN LIEU 26,172 31,539 41,000 40,300 98.3% 41,500 Total - Motor Vehicle In-Lieu Tax 26,172 31,539 41,000 40,300 98.3% 41,500

HOMEOWNERS PROPERTY TAX RELIEF
100.522.111.119 HOMEOWNERS PROP TAX RELIEF 11,701 5,622 10,000 5,500 55.0% 10,000 Total - Homeowners Property Tax Relief 11,701 5,622 10,000 5,500 55.0% 10,000

PEACE OFFICERS STANDARARDS & TRAINING
100.525.645.593 POST 968
- - - #DIV/0!
-
Total - Peace Officers Standards & Training 968
- - - #DIV/0!
-

PARKS CHARGES FOR SERVICES
100.630.631.100 DAY/PASS FEES 21,405 21,476 15,000 9,250 61.7% 15,000 100.630.631.101 RAQUETBALL REVENUE 30 - - - #DIV/0! 100 100.630.631.103 PASSES REVENUE 17,180 14,100 10,000 4,945 49.5% 6,000 100.630.631.105 SNACK BAR - HARVEY HOUSE 286 159 - 66 #DIV/0! 100 100.630.631.106 SNACK BAR / VENDING 12,717 3,243 - 3,805 #DIV/0! 5,000 100.630.631.107 PICKLE BALL REVENUES - - - - #DIV/0! 300 100.630.631.200 KARATE 8,970 6,975 8,000 3,500 43.8% 4,000 100.630.631.203 JUDO 3,025 2,275 2,500 1,750 70.0% 2,000 100.630.631.206 AEROBIC / WEIGHT CLASS 2,480 360 - 700 #DIV/0! 750 100.630.631.210 MIDDLE SCHOOL BASKETBALL - - - - #DIV/0! -
100.630.631.211 ELEMENTARY BASKETBALL 11,150 12,890 13,000 5,610 43.2% 10,000 100.630.631.212 REGISTRATION - PEEWEE 1,305 1,080 1,500 - 0.0% - 100.630.631.213 CHEERLEADING 9,955 3,175 - - #DIV/0! -
100.630.631.214 INDOOR KIDDIE SOCCER 3,240 3,195 4,500 4,500 100.0% 4,500 100.630.631.217 ADULT BASKETBALL - - - - #DIV/0!
-
100.630.631.222 WRESTLING 1,225 3,700 2,500 1,875 75.0% 2,000 100.630.631.224 VOLLEYBALL - - 2,000 - 0.0% -
100.630.631.229 WOMENS SELF DEFENSE COURSE - - - - #DIV/0! - 100.630.631.231 TENNIS 550 25 - - #DIV/0!
-
100.630.631.232 TRACK & FIELD 685 - - - #DIV/0!
-
100.630.631.233 ADULT MENS SOCCER - - - - #DIV/0! 4,500 100.630.631.234 AIKIDO - - - - #DIV/0!
-
100.630.631.235 ARTS & CRAFTS - 135 - - #DIV/0!
-
100.630.631.236 3/5/10K RUN/WALKS - - - - #DIV/0! 2,500.00 100.630.631.237 EVENT VENDOR FEE - - - - #DIV/0! 300.00 100.630.632.100 TOT TIME REGISTRATION - - - - #DIV/0! - 100.630.636.100 OPEN SWIM 12,169 17,514 12,000 5,000 41.7% 6,000 100.630.636.102 LESSONS 2,340 690 600 570 95.0% 3,450
100.630.636.104 SNACK BAR - POOL 7,333 4,426 200 500 250.0% 1,000 100.630.636.107 LIFE GUARD COURSE 1,440 - - - #DIV/0! 160 Total - Parks Charges for Services 117,485 95,418 71,800 42,071 58.6% 67,660 GENERAL FUND REVENUE 100
14 15.a
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD)

SPORTSPARK CHARGES FOR SERVICES
100.640.200.201 SOFTBALL MENS TEAM REGISTRATION 5,100 900 5,100 7,500 147.1% 7,500 100.640.200.202 SOFTBALL COED TEAM REGISTRATION - - 13,500 14,100 104.4% 14,700 100.640.200.204 T-BALL REGISTRATION 1,235 765 2,950 4,600 155.9% 4,600 100.640.600.601 SPORTSPARK CONCESSIONS 29,404 4,582 6,000 8,500 141.7% 11,500 Total - Sportspark Charges for Services 35,739 6,247 27,550 34,700 126.0% 38,300

ZONING & SUBDIVISION FEES
100.701.705.609 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS 531 3,186 - - #DIV/0! - 100.701.705.610 VARIANCE 1,582 1,582 - - #DIV/0! -
100.701.705.611 ZONE CHANGE 2,282 - - - #DIV/0! 2,000
100.701.710.612 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 7,763 13,308 5,000 4,500 90.0% 7,800 100.701.710.613 VACATION OF STREETS - - - - #DIV/0! -
100.701.710.615 HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT 1,100 1,150 800 1,000 125.0% 1,200 100.701.710.616 MISC FEES AND PERMITS 204 418 250 300 120.0% 400 100.701.710.617 FILMING PERMIT 1,050 1,050 1,000 300 30.0% 300 100.701.710.618 ZONE VERIFICATION & AFFIDAVIT - 10 - - #DIV/0! - 100.701.712.616 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT ( TUP ) 1,854 1,075 800 270 33.8% 300 Total - Zoning & Subdivision Fees 16,366 21,779 7,850 6,370 81.1% 12,000

PLAN CHECKING FEES
100.704.715.608 APPEALS TO PLANNING COMMISSION - - - - #DIV/0! - 100.704.715.610 FINAL PARCEL MAP 2,828 707 700 - 0.0% 700 100.704.715.611 TENATIVE PARCEL MAP 3,739 913 900 - 0.0% - 100.704.715.613 PLAN CHECK FEE 84,904 85,095 75,000 45,000 60.0% 72,000 100.704.715.614 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1,913 2,108 2,100 1,000 47.6% 1,000 100.704.715.618 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 3,475 2,386 - 1,000 #DIV/0! 1,200 100.704.715.619 SITE PLAN REVIEW 1,125 375 1,000 375 37.5% 375 Total - Plan Checking Fees 97,984 91,584 79,700 47,375 59.4% 75,275

CANNABIS FEES
100.780.720.601 CANNABIS FEES-FINGERPRINTING/BACKGROU 4,384 14,072 10,000 10,000 100.0% 10,200 100.780.720.602 CANNABIS FEES-INITIAL APPLICATION 149,159 - 20,000 20,000 100.0% 20,000 100.780.720.603 CANNABIS FEES-ANNUAL RENEWAL 28,216 28,216 328,000 328,000 100.0% 126,970 100.780.720.604 CANNABIS FEES-QUARTERLY INSPECTIONS 4,950 19,250 17,050 17,050 100.0% 19,800 100.780.720.605 CANNABIS FEES-DISPENSARY/DELIVERY FEE 3 89,137 137,720 120,000 120,000 100.0% 135,000 100.780.720.606 CANNABIS FEES-FACILITY FEE $5/SQ FT - 186,776 594,500 594,500 100.0% 496,225 100.780.720.607 CANNABIS FEES-COMMUNITY BENEFIT PROGR 76,250 342,690 323,500 323,500 100.0% 323,000 100.780.720.608 CANNABIS FEES-PUBLIC SAFETY 50% ALLOC 89,137 137,720 120,000 120,000 100.0% 135,000 Total - Cannabis Fees 441,233 866,443 1,533,050 1,533,050 100.0% 1,266,195

OTHER CURR SC-FINGERPRINTS
100.802.745.622 P.D. PRINT FEES 7,878 3,036 3,000 3,920 130.7% 5,200 Total - Other Curr SC-Fingerprints 7,878 3,036 3,000 3,920 130.7% 5,200

OTHER CURRENT SC-DAR ADMIN
100.804.790.925 CHARGES FOR SERVICES-FLEET 67,154 44,301 50,000 - 0.0% - 100.804.790.926 FLEET-OVERHEAD CHARGES 6,716 4,430 5,000 - 0.0% - 100.804.790.927 WC INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT 76,582 5,713 - - #DIV/0! - 100.804.790.928 GENERAL LIAB/PROPERTY CLAIM REIMB 5,807 - - - #DIV/0! - Total - Other Current SC-DAR Admin 156,260 54,444 55,000 - 0.0% -

OTHER REVENUE SOURCES-ALL OTHER
100.819.640.561 CAL TRANS ST SWEEPING REIMB 4,540 4,540 4,540 4,540 100.0% 4,550 100.819.752.600 POLICE RESOURCE OFFICER/BUSD 186,121 215,927 150,000 109,000 72.7% 114,000 100.819.752.604 POLICE SERVICE REVENUE 15,622 58,853 35,000 26,000 74.3% 30,000 100.819.752.606 GF PROJ REIMBURSEMENT COST 1,907 6,561 20,000 20,000 100.0% 10,000 100.819.753.606 STATE MANDATED COST REIMB/SB90 20,327 31,238 35,000 35,000 100.0% 35,000 100.819.753.612 DISPATCH COSTS TO FIRE DIST 205,000 205,000 205,000 154,000 75.1% 160,000 100.819.755.631 COPY/VIDEO/CD'S/MAPS REVENUE 5,416 7,707 6,000 5,700 95.0% 5,800 100.819.775.635 RETURN CHECK SERVICE CHARGE 125 75 100 - 0.0% - 100.819.782.645 PASSPORT PROCESSING FEE 4,025 35 2,500 - 0.0% - 100.819.782.647 ERMA INDEMNITY REIMBURSEMENT - - - - #DIV/0! - 100.819.783.632 CELL TOWER RENT - - - - #DIV/0! -
100.819.783.634 PARK-MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 20,140 8,525 2,000 1,250 62.5% 1,250 100.819.783.636 PRINCIPAL-FIRE LOAN REPAYMENT - - - - #DIV/0! - 100.819.784.909 SALE OF PROPERTY 5,000 - - - #DIV/0! -
100.819.784.910 SALE OF EQUIPMENT 6,190 61,088 20,000 20,000 100.0% 5,000 100.819.784.913 FIREWORKS APPLICATION FEES 1,600 1,200 1,600 1,500 93.8% 1,500 100.819.788.920 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 190,443 67,683 40,000 53,900 134.8% 40,000 100.819.788.921 PERMA/ERMA REIMBURSEMENT 36,237 5,872 - - #DIV/0! - 100.819.788.922 RESTITUTION REIMBURSEMENTS - 3 - - #DIV/0! - 100.819.788.923 CENSUS 2020 - CA COMPLETE COUNT - - - - #DIV/0! - 100.819.788.924 CREDIT CARD CONVENIENCE FEES 3,535 3,451 3,000 3,800 126.7% 3,900 100.819.788.925 CANDIDATE STATEMENTS 720 - 500 - 0.0% - 100.819.788.927 IGSA-ANIMAL CONTROL 10,096 8,765 9,600 9,700 101.0% 10,900 100.819.788.928 HARVEY HOUSE MISC INCOME 2,641 5,727 9,000 9,820 109.1% 10,000 100.819.788.929 REIMBURSEMENTS 66,509 93,561 2,500 6,250 250.0% 1,887,500 100.819.788.931 IGSA-SOLID WASTE 55,325 207,575 235,000 205,000 87.2% 220,000 100.819.788.932 IGSA-MAIL SERVICES 7,287 8,317 8,300 8,000 96.4% 8,100 100.819.788.933 IGSA-FORT IRWIN BASE OPERATIONS 502,045 658,479 640,000 640,000 100.0% 753,500 100.819.788.934 NATIONAL OPIOIDS SETTLEMENT 27,751 17,957 72,500 76,000 104.8% 72,000 100.819.788.935 IGSA-HAZARDOUS WASTE - 10,375 36,500 46,700 127.9% 52,500 100.819.788.999 GASB 87 - LEASE PROCEEDS 627,672 667,355 - - #DIV/0! - 100.819.790.924 POLICE CONFISCATED FUNDS 5,481 10,254 5,000 5,150 103.0% 5,100 100.819.794.928 RECOVERY/DAMAGES - - - - #DIV/0! -
100.819.794.929 GOLDEN STATE WATER CONTRACT REVENUE 15,392 15,392 15,392 6,500 42.2% 6,500 Total - Other Revenue Sources-All Other 2,027,148 2,381,513 1,559,032 1,447,810 92.9% 3,437,100 GENERAL FUND REVENUE 100
15 15.a
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD)

TRANSFERS/CONTRIBUTIONS
100.900.820.202 TRANSFER FROM COVID-19 4,770,039 - - - #DIV/0! - 100.900.820.302 TRANSFER FROM DEBT SERVICE - - - - #DIV/0! - 100.900.820.997 TRANSFER FROM SUCCESSOR AGENCY 36,510 - - - #DIV/0! - Total - Transfers/Contributions 4,806,549 - - - #DIV/0! - TOTAL - GENERAL FUND REVENUES (FUND 100) 29,475,724 25,194,727 24,320,627 23,231,818 95.5% 27,194,935

MEASURE Q - SALES TAX
102.406.210.120 MEASURE Q TAX 10,212,109 9,863,721 9,400,000 9,378,694 99.8% 9,585,000 Total - Measure Q - Sales Tax 10,212,109 9,863,721 9,400,000 9,378,694 99.8% 9,585,000

INVESTMENT EARNINGS
102.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS/INVESTMENTS (37,308) 54,524 - 40,000 #DIV/0! 40,000 Total - Investment Earnings (37,308) 54,524 - 40,000 #DIV/0! 40,000

OTHER REV SOURCES-ALL OTHER
102.819.784.910 SALE OF EQUIPMENT - 14,344 -
102.819.788.920 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 26,456 - - - #DIV/0! - 102.819.788.929 REIMBURSEMENTS - 85,686 - 34,500 #DIV/0! 35,000 102.819.788.999 GASB 87 - LEASE PROCEEDS - - - - #DIV/0! - Total - Other Rev Sources-All Other 26,456 100,031 - 34,500 #DIV/0! 35,000

TRANSFERS
102.900.820.302 TRANSFER FROM DEBT SERVICE - - - - #DIV/0! - Total - Transfers - - - - #DIV/0! -
TOTAL - GENERAL FUND REVENUES (MEASURE Q - FUND 102) 10,201,257 10,018,275 9,400,000 9,453,194 100.6% 9,660,000

INVESTMENT EARNINGS
103.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS/INVESTMENTS 503 - - - #DIV/0! - Total - Investment Earnings 503 - - - #DIV/0! -

REIMBURSEMENTS
103.819.788.999 GASB 87 - LEASE PROCEEDS - - - - #DIV/0! - Total - Reimbursements - - - - #DIV/0! -

TRANSFERS
103.900.820.102 TRANSFER FROM MEAS Q 102 4,736,023 4,275,571 4,137,525 4,275,571 103.3% - Total - Transfers 4,736,023 4,275,571 4,137,525 4,275,571 103.3% - TOTAL - GENERAL FUND REVENUES (MEASURE Q FIRE - FUND 103) 4,736,526 4,275,571 4,137,525 4,275,571 103.3% -

INVESTMENT EARNINGS
104.514.110.410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 121,709 213,893 - - #DIV/0! - 104.514.110.416 INTEREST - WW LOAN $4 MILLION - - - - #DIV/0! - 104.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS/INVESTMENTS (32,291) 56,567 - - #DIV/0! - Total - Investment Earnings 89,418 270,460 - - #DIV/0! -

REIMBURSEMENTS
104.819.783.636 PRINCIPAL-FIRE LOAN REPAYMENT - - 500,000 500,000 100.0% 500,000 Total - Reimbursements - - 500,000 500,000 100.0% 500,000 TOTAL - GENERAL FUND REVENUES (GF II - FUND 104) 89,418 270,460 500,000 500,000 100.0% 500,000 TOTAL - GENERAL FUND REVENUES 44,502,924 39,759,033 38,358,152 37,460,583 97.7% 37,354,935 GENERAL FUND REVENUE - MEASURE Q 102
GENERAL FUND REVENUE - MEASURE Q FIRE 103
GENERAL FUND REVENUE - GENERAL FUND II 104
GENERAL FUND REVENUE 100
16 15.a
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 110 General Government Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 110 City Council 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.110.110.01 SALARIES
100.110.110.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 28,248 30,265 30,300 30,300 100% 30,300 100.110.110.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 46,250 48,000 48,000 48,000 100% 48,000 Total Salaries 74,498 78,265 78,300 78,300 100.0% 78,300 100.110.110.02 BENEFITS
100.110.110.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 1,557 1,045 2,600 2,600 100% 2,600 100.110.110.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 704 484 1,500 1,500 100% 1,500 100.110.110.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 4,399 5,891 6,000 6,000 100% 6,000 100.110.110.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS - - - - #DIV/0! - Total Benefits 6,659 7,420 10,100 10,100 100.0% 10,100
100.110.110.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
100.110.110.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES 699 2,950 500 500 100% 500 100.110.110.03.305 DUES/SUBS/MEMBERSHIPS 23,145 24,309 33,724 33,724 100% 34,000 100.110.110.03.319 COUNCILMEMBER-HERNANDEZ 75 679 - - #DIV/0! 1,000 100.110.110.03.321 COUNCIL MEMBER-NOBLE 3,265 - - - #DIV/0! 1,000 100.110.110.03.322 COUNCILMEMEBER-COURTNEY 1,983 1,945 2,000 - 0% 1,000 100.110.110.03.323 COUNCILMEMBER-DYER KRUSE 2,653 1,644 2,000 - 0% 1,000 100.110.110.03.324 COUNCILMEMBER-ROSE 1,073 650 2,000 - 0% 1,000 Total Employee Development 32,893 32,177 40,224 34,224 85.1% 39,500 100.110.110.04 COMMUNICATIONS
100.110.110.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 3,505 3,187 3,350 2,950 88% 3,350 Total Communications 3,505 3,187 3,350 2,950 88.1% 3,350 100.110.110.05 SUPPLIES
100.110.110.05.501 OFFICE SUPPLIES 12,928 13,935 2,000 - 0% 1,000 100.110.110.05.520 ADS/PUBLICATIONS 2,895 - 2,000 - 0% 1,000 100.110.110.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 759 3,107 1,000 - 0% 1,000 Total Supplies 16,582 17,042 5,000 - 0.0% 3,000
100.110.110.06 SERVICES
100.110.110.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 638 4,432 35,000 - 0% 15,000 Total Services 638 4,432 35,000 - 0.0% 15,000
Department Total 134,775 142,523 171,974 125,574 73.0% 149,250 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Part Time:

Mayor & City Council 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Total FTE's: 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
2024-2025 HIGHLIGHTS 2025-2026 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
City Council
* Welcomed a new City Councilmember representing District 4, as well as a new Mayor.
* Represented the City on various regional boards, joint powers authorities, committees, and commissions.
* Continued active engagement with the League of California Cities, including service on the Board of Directors,
participation in the Annual Conference, and attendance at quarterly Policy Committee meetings.
* Issued proclamations and certificates of recognition to honor local businesses, organizations, and community members in Barstow.

1. Governance & Transparency
• Promote open, transparent, and accountable local government. • Increase public engagement through improved communication and accessible council meetings. • Ensure ethical leadership and decision-making.

2. Fiscal Responsibility
• Maintain a balanced budget while investing in priority areas. • Identify and secure new revenue streams (e.g., grants, public-private partnerships). • Improve financial transparency and reporting for the public.

3. Economic Development
• Support business retention, expansion, and attraction efforts. • Promote job creation through partnerships with industry and workforce development programs.

4. Infrastructure & Public Works
• Prioritize funding for street repairs, bridge improvements, and utility upgrades. • Expand and maintain parks, recreational facilities, and public spaces.

5. Public Safety
• Ensure sufficient staffing, training, and resources for police, fire, and emergency services. • Strengthen community policing and crime prevention programs. • Improve disaster preparedness and emergency response capabilities.

6. Housing & Homelessness
• Partner with local organizations to provide services for individuals experiencing homelessness.

7. Community Engagement & Equity
• Foster inclusive policies that reflect the diversity of the community. • Support youth programs, senior services, and cultural initiatives. 17 15.a
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 110 General Government Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 115 Transfers and Others 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.110.115.02 BENEFITS
100.110.115.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT - - - - #DIV/0! - 100.110.115.02.204 BENEFITS - UNEMPLOYMENT - - 5,000 - 0% - 100.110.115.02.210 BENEFITS - WORKERS COMP CLAIMS 777,546 663,394 500,000 70,000 14% 250,000 100.110.115.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT - - 300,000 620,000 207% 400,000 100.110.115.02.219 CALPERS REPLACEMENT BENEFIT-RETIREES 2,846 2,215 8,500 2,500 29% 5,000 100.110.115.02.220 RETIREE HEALTH - PEMCHA 132,348 134,693 155,000 150,800 97% 155,000 100.110.115.02.221 RETIREMENT BENEFITS-ROWE 15,182 14,875 30,000 15,500 52% 30,000 100.110.115.02.222 RETIREE HEALTH COMPENSATION 294,240 310,251 310,000 323,000 104% 325,000 100.110.115.02.227 PENSION UNFUNDED LIABILITY 485,065 - 301,796 301,796 100% 724,321 Total Benefits 1,707,227 1,125,427 1,610,296 1,483,596 92.1% 1,889,321 100.110.115.09 TRANSFERS/CONTINGENCY/CONTRAS
100.110.115.09.102 COST ALLOCATION-MEASURE Q (508,000) (508,000) (508,000) (508,000) 100% (508,000) 100.110.115.09.104 COST ALLOCATION-GEN FUND II (11,900) (11,900) (11,900) (11,900) 100% (11,900) 100.110.115.09.209 TRANSFER FROM MEASURE I (16,300) (16,300) (16,300) (16,300) 100% (16,300) 100.110.115.09.210 TRANSFER FROM GAS FUND (6,900) (6,900) (6,900) (6,900) 100% (6,900) 100.110.115.09.219 TRANSFER FROM COPS FUND (80,000) (80,000) (80,000) (80,000) 100% (80,000) 100.110.115.09.225 COST ALLOCATION-FIRE DEPT (884,000) (884,000) (884,000) (884,000) 100% (884,000) 100.110.115.09.302 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE 734,784 736,630 735,623 735,623 100% 736,554 100.110.115.09.400 TRANSFER TO CIP FUND - - 32,480 10,000 31% - 100.110.115.09.605 COST ALLOCATION-WW (770,000) (770,000) (770,000) (770,000) 100% (770,000) 100.110.115.09.650 COST ALLOCATION-SW (320,000) (320,000) (320,000) (320,000) 100% (320,000) Total Transfer/Contingency/Contras (1,862,316) (1,860,470) (1,828,997) (1,851,477) 101.2% (1,860,546) Department Total (155,089) (735,043) (218,701) (367,881) 168.2% 28,775 Transfers and Others
18 15.a
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 110 General Government Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 120 City Manager 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.110.120.01 SALARIES
100.110.120.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 373,939 408,300 501,500 501,500 100.0% 875,500 100.110.120.01.106 AUTO ALLOWANCE 5,750 3,250 - - #DIV/0! - 100.110.120.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 26,513 27,875 28,500 28,500 100.0% 51,000 Total Salaries 406,201 439,425 530,000 530,000 100.0% 926,500 100.110.120.02 BENEFITS
100.110.120.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 23,560 48,998 113,600 113,600 100.0% 92,100 100.110.120.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 883 876 1,600 1,600 100.0% 2,300 100.110.120.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 19,813 24,659 39,354 39,354 100.0% 40,602 100.110.120.02.206 BENEFITS - DEFERRED COMP 5,652 9,195 8,900 8,900 100.0% 11,500 100.110.120.02.207 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE - - - - #DIV/0! -
100.110.120.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 12,552 16,804 19,400 19,400 100.0% 26,000 100.110.120.02.213 BILINGUAL SERVICES - 120 - - #DIV/0! - 100.110.120.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 3,152 3,863 7,400 7,400 100.0% 10,800 100.110.120.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 16,746 64,947 - - #DIV/0! - Total Benefits 82,358 169,463 190,254 190,254 100.0% 183,302 100.110.120.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
100.110.120.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES 13,358 13,929 13,200 13,200 100.0% 15,000 100.110.120.03.305 DUES/SUBS/MEMBERSHIPS 4,209 5,085 5,400 5,400 100.0% 5,400 Total Employee Development 17,567 19,014 18,600 18,600 100.0% 20,400 100.110.120.04 COMMUNICATIONS
100.110.120.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 1,915 2,481 2,400 2,100 87.5% 4,200 Total Communications 1,915 2,481 2,400 2,100 87.5% 4,200 100.110.120.05 SUPPLIES
100.110.120.05.501 OFFICE SUPPLIES 3,036 1,777 10,000 10,000 100.0% 1,000 Total Supplies 3,036 1,777 10,000 10,000 100.0% 1,000
100.110.120.06 SERVICES
100.110.120.06.627 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL - - 11,500 - 0.0% - 100.110.120.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 174,224 67,569 167,000 160,000 95.8% 500,000 100.110.120.06.631 FEES/SERVICES - COVID-19 - - 42,000 - 0.0% - Total Services 174,224 67,569 220,500 160,000 72.6% 500,000 Department Total 685,301 699,728 971,754 910,954 93.7% 1,635,402 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00

0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Full Time:

City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Economic Development Director
Administrative Services Director
Public Information Officer
Economic Development Administrator
Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Total FTE's: 3.00 5.00 5.00 4.00
City Manager
19 15.a
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 110 General Government Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 125 City Attorney 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.110.125.06 SERVICES
100.110.125.06.625 LEGAL FEES-RETAINER 133,761 111,582 126,000 126,000 100% 126,000 100.110.125.06.626 PROF SERV. LEGAL 364,254 279,123 260,000 400,000 154% 350,000 Total Services 498,015 390,705 386,000 526,000 136.3% 476,000 Department Total 498,015 390,705 386,000 526,000 136.3% 476,000 City Attorney
20 15.a
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 110 General Government Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 130 Municipal Records 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.110.130.01 SALARIES
100.110.130.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 291,957 198,710 257,200 257,200 100.0% 207,900 100.110.130.01.103 OVERTIME 1,185 136 1,000 1,000 100.0% 1,000 100.110.130.01.108 SALARIES CASUAL 1,306 31,850 8,000 - 0.0% - 100.110.130.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 41,125 28,000 33,000 33,000 100.0% 18,000 Total Salaries 335,573 258,696 299,200 291,200 97.3% 226,900 100.110.130.02 BENEFITS
100.110.130.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 33,733 22,251 26,600 26,600 100.0% 22,800 100.110.130.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 1,091 732 900 900 100.0% 700 100.110.130.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 9,753 11,837 18,891 18,891 100.0% 19,490 100.110.130.02.206 BENEFITS - DEFERRED COMP 1,131 849 1,300 1,300 100.0% 1,300 100.110.130.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 6,470 5,507 5,800 5,800 100.0% 5,100 100.110.130.02.211 BENEFITS-PARS 15 414 300 - 0.0% -
100.110.130.02.213 BILINGUAL SERVICES 660 1,080 1,500 1,500 100.0% 1,500 100.110.130.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 3,121 2,101 3,000 3,000 100.0% 2,600 100.110.130.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 4,410 22,256 - - #DIV/0! - Total Benefits 60,385 67,028 58,291 57,991 99.5% 53,490 100.110.130.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
100.110.130.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES 9,107 3,719 6,020 - 0.0% 5,950 100.110.130.03.305 DUES/SUBS/MEMBERSHIPS 265 1,200 650 - 0.0% 1,000 Total Employee Development 9,372 4,919 6,670 - 0.0% 6,950 100.110.130.04 COMMUNICATIONS
100.110.130.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS - - 1,000 - 0.0% -
Total Communications - - 1,000 - 0.0% -
100.110.130.05 SUPPLIES
100.110.130.05.501 OFFICE SUPPLIES 2,692 14,546 4,000 - 0.0% 4,000 100.110.130.05.520 ADS/PUBLICATIONS 32,370 5,154 5,000 - 0.0% 5,000 Total Supplies 35,063 19,700 9,000 - 0.0% 9,000
100.110.130.06 SERVICES
100.110.130.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 16 458 2,700 - 0.0% 5,600 100.110.130.06.631 ELECTIONS 7,915 - 15,000 - 0.0% 1,000 100.110.130.06.644 IT COST ALLOCATION 39,468 50,360 72,000 45,000 62.5% 94,050 Total Services 47,400 50,819 89,700 45,000 50.2% 100,650 Department Total 487,792 401,161 463,861 394,191 85.0% 396,990 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

City Clerk Services Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Assistant 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Total FTE's: 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.00
Municipal Records Division (City Clerks Services)
21 15.a
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 110 General Government Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 132 City Clerk 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.110.132.01 SALARIES
100.110.132.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 5,549 6,053 6,100 6,100 100.0% 6,100 100.110.132.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 8,250 9,000 9,000 9,000 100.0% 9,000 Total Salaries 13,799 15,053 15,100 15,100 100.0% 15,100 100.110.132.02 BENEFITS
100.110.132.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 467 522 550 550 100.0% 550 100.110.132.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 104 132 175 175 100.0% 175 100.110.132.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 392 429 450 450 100.0% 450 Total Benefits 964 1,083 1,175 1,175 100.0% 1,175
100.110.132.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
100.110.132.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES 9,404 5,841 4,500 - 0.0% 3,600 100.110.132.03.305 DUES/SUBS/MEMBERSHIPS 225 625 500 - 0.0% 500 Total Employee Development 9,629 6,466 5,000 - 0.0% 4,100 100.110.132.04 COMMUNICATIONS
100.110.132.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 456 442 700 950 135.7% 950 Total Communications 456 442 700 950 135.7% 950
Department Total 24,848 23,044 21,975 17,225 78.4% 21,325 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

City Clerk 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total FTE's: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
City Clerk
22 15.a
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 110 General Government Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 160 IT Admin Division 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.110.160.01 SALARIES
100.110.160.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 334,131 362,183 377,900 377,900 100% 384,600 100.110.160.01.103 OVERTIME 13,835 14,374 12,000 16,000 133% 12,600 100.110.160.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 42,625 45,000 45,000 45,000 100% 45,000 100.110.160.01.111 STANDBY BASIC 12,057 15,647 16,000 16,000 100% 16,800 Total Salaries 402,647 437,204 450,900 454,900 101% 459,000 100.110.160.02 BENEFITS
100.110.160.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 42,223 52,018 54,100 54,100 100% 55,200 100.110.160.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 1,178 1,173 1,200 1,200 100% 1,300 100.110.160.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 12,512 13,135 20,963 20,963 100% 21,628 100.110.160.02.206 BENEFITS - DEFERRED COMP 1,337 1,429 1,500 1,500 100% 1,500 100.110.160.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 7,988 8,641 7,900 7,900 100% 8,000 100.110.160.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 3,785 4,164 4,400 4,400 100% 4,800 100.110.160.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 17,853 14,993 - - #DIV/0! - Total Benefits 86,876 95,555 90,063 90,063 100% 92,428
100.110.160.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
100.110.160.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES - 6,274 8,000 3,000 38% 3,000 100.110.160.03.305 DUES/SUBS/MEMBERSHIPS 428 130 500 400 80% 500 Total Employee Development 428 6,404 8,500 3,400 40% 3,500 100.110.160.04 COMMUNICATIONS
100.110.160.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 4,366 6,349 5,900 5,950 101% 5,950 Total Communications 4,366 6,349 5,900 5,950 101% 5,950 100.110.160.05 SUPPLIES
100.110.160.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 15,167 16,722 10,000 18,000 180% 18,000 100.110.160.05.526 OTHER DEPT TECH SUPPLIES 15,905 14,522 15,000 15,000 100% 15,000 Total Supplies 31,072 31,244 25,000 33,000 132% 33,000
100.110.160.06 SERVICES
100.110.160.06.612 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE - - 2,000 - 0% - 100.110.160.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 236,292 246,076 240,300 320,000 133% 425,000 100.110.160.06.644 IT COST ALLOCATION 21,713 9,624 14,500 - 0% - Total Services 258,005 255,700 256,800 320,000 125% 425,000 Department Total 783,394 832,455 837,163 907,313 108% 1,018,878 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Information Technology Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Information Technology Coordinator 1.00 1.00 - -
Information Technology Technician 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Total FTE's: 4.00 5.00 4.00 4.00
Information Technology Admin Division
23 15.a
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 110 General Government Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 165 HR Admin Division 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.110.165.01 SALARIES
100.110.165.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 136,772 149,147 142,100 142,100 100.0% 259,700 100.110.165.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 11,500 12,000 12,000 12,000 100.0% 21,000 Total Salaries 148,272 161,147 154,100 154,100 100.0% 280,700 100.110.165.02 BENEFITS
100.110.165.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 9,641 10,559 11,100 11,100 100.0% 29,500 100.110.165.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 359 386 400 400 100.0% 800 100.110.165.02.204 BENEFITS - UNEMPLOYMENT 34,640 20,089 20,000 27,200 136.0% 28,000 100.110.165.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 4,402 5,045 8,052 8,052 100.0% 8,307 100.110.165.02.206 BENEFITS - DEFERRED COMP 1,260 1,363 1,400 1,400 100.0% 2,600 100.110.165.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 3,850 4,122 4,300 4,300 100.0% 7,700 100.110.165.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 1,319 1,386 1,600 1,600 100.0% 3,200 100.110.165.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 7,902 7,633 - - #DIV/0! - Total Benefits 63,372 50,583 46,852 54,052 115.4% 80,107 100.110.165.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
100.110.165.03.300 EDUCATION REIMBURSEMENT 2,940 4,394 4,000 3,450 86.3% 4,000 100.110.165.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES 6,042 5,156 10,000 7,500 75.0% 9,650 100.110.165.03.303 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 1,553 168 1,000 - 0.0% 1,000 100.110.165.03.305 DUES/SUBS/MEMBERSHIPS 955 725 645 475 73.6% 475 Total Employee Development 11,489 10,444 15,645 11,425 73.0% 15,125 100.110.165.04 COMMUNICATIONS
100.110.165.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 2,096 2,379 2,125 2,650 124.7% 2,650 Total Communications 2,096 2,379 2,125 2,650 124.7% 2,650 100.110.165.05 SUPPLIES
100.110.165.05.501 OFFICE SUPPLIES 121 49 300 102 34.0% 150 100.110.165.05.524 BEAT COMMITTEE EXPENSE 7,263 6,198 7,500 7,400 98.7% 7,500 100.110.165.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES - - 300 276 92.0% 300 Total Supplies 7,384 6,247 8,100 7,778 96.0% 7,950
100.110.165.06 SERVICES
100.110.165.06.624 PROF LEGAL SVCS - SETTLEMENT 219,434 71,907 245,000 242,100 98.8% 245,000 100.110.165.06.626 PROF SERV. LEGAL 40,139 77,367 80,000 114,200 142.8% 98,000 100.110.165.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 101,564 170,200 110,000 95,000 86.4% 58,700 100.110.165.06.631 PARS 5,725 6,316 6,500 3,400 52.3% 6,200 100.110.165.06.632 PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT COSTS 20,352 18,491 22,000 20,000 90.9% 23,500 Total Services 387,214 344,281 463,500 474,700 102.4% 431,400 Department Total 619,828 575,080 690,322 704,705 102.1% 817,932 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Human Resources Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Administrative Analyst 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00
Total FTE's: 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00
Human Resources Admin Division
24 15.a
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 110 General Government Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 175 Insurance/Risk Mgmt 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.110.175.07 TAXES/INSURANCE/MISCELLANEOUS
100.110.175.07.705 INSURANCE CLAIMS 356,997 278,886 200,000 100,000 50% 150,000 100.110.175.07.720 INSURANCE, PROPERTY 200,666 288,235 339,091 323,910 96% 378,408 100.110.175.07.724 INSURANCE, LIABILITY 591,974 771,646 1,148,901 1,122,319 98% 1,442,146 100.110.175.07.726 INSURANCE, CYBER/CRIME 20,903 26,686 50,140 25,468 51% 38,890 Total Taxes/Insurance/Misc. 1,170,540 1,365,453 1,738,132 1,571,697 90.42% 2,009,444 Department Total 1,170,540 1,365,453 1,738,132 1,571,697 90.42% 2,009,444 Insurance/Risk Management Division
25 15.a
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 110 General Government Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 180 Cannabis Regulation 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.110.180.05 SUPPLIES
100.110.180.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES - - 2,500 600 24% 1,000 Total Supplies - - 2,500 600 24.0% 1,000
100.110.180.06 SERVICES
100.110.180.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 3,688 6,146 8,000 355 4% 1,000 Total Services 3,688 6,146 8,000 355 4.4% 1,000
100.110.180.08 CAPITAL EQUIP/PROJECTS
100.110.180.08.801 POLICE DEPT BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS - 7,596 55,403 40,000 72% - Total Capital Equip/Projects - 7,596 55,403 40,000 72.2% - Department Total 3,688 13,743 65,903 40,955 62.1% 2,000 Cannabis Regulations Division
26 15.a
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 120 Finance Department Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 210 Finance Division 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.120.210.01 SALARIES
100.120.210.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 359,650 482,185 686,700 686,700 100.0% 670,500 100.120.210.01.103 OVERTIME 27 1,236 6,500 6,500 100.0% 6,825 100.120.210.01.108 SALARIES CASUAL 69,069 (4) 9,010 9,010 100.0% - 100.120.210.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 40,825 44,175 67,200 67,200 100.0% 65,100 Total Salaries 469,570 527,592 769,410 769,410 100.0% 742,425 100.120.210.02 BENEFITS
100.120.210.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 33,597 55,536 78,100 78,100 100.0% 66,200 100.120.210.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 1,185 1,297 2,100 2,100 100.0% 2,100 100.120.210.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 23,309 21,386 34,130 - 0.0% 35,213 100.120.210.02.206 BENEFITS - DEFERRED COMP 2,071 3,364 6,300 6,300 100.0% 4,100 100.120.210.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 10,408 13,262 18,500 18,500 100.0% 16,000 100.120.210.02.211 BENEFITS-PARS - 1 125 - 0.0% -
100.120.210.02.213 BILINGUAL SERVICES 660 7,741 8,000 8,000 100.0% 800 100.120.210.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 3,822 4,900 7,900 7,900 100.0% 8,300 100.120.210.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 16,064 29,924 - - #DIV/0! - Total Benefits 91,117 137,409 155,155 120,900 77.9% 132,713 100.120.210.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
100.120.210.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES 991 10,577 14,500 14,500 100.0% 15,000 100.120.210.03.305 DUES/SUBS/MEMBERSHIPS 429 320 700 60 8.6% 695 Total Employee Development 1,420 10,897 15,200 14,560 95.8% 15,695 100.120.210.04 COMMUNICATIONS
100.120.210.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 574 576 675 725 107.4% 725 Total Communications 574 576 675 725 107.4% 725
100.120.210.05 SUPPLIES
100.120.210.05.501 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7,070 8,545 7,000 6,200 88.6% 6,500 Total Supplies 7,070 8,545 7,000 6,200 88.6% 6,500
100.120.210.06 SERVICES
100.120.210.06.628 AUDIT EXPENSE 43,540 32,212 32,753 32,000 97.7% 33,000 100.120.210.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 58,116 152,591 172,200 172,200 100.0% 154,000 100.120.210.06.644 IT COST ALLOCATION 120,881 132,184 182,000 32,000 17.6% 158,200 Total Services 222,537 316,988 386,953 236,200 61.0% 345,200 Department Total 792,288 1,002,007 1,334,393 1,147,995 86.0% 1,243,258 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Finance Director 0.00 0.80 0.80 0.80
Administrative Services Manager 0.80 0.80 0.00 0.00
Assistant Finance Director 0.00 0.00 0.80 1.00
Principal Accountant 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.50
Accountant 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50
Accounting Technician 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Office Assistant 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00
Total FTE's: 3.80 5.60 7.60 6.80
Finance Division
27 15.a
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 120 Finance Department Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 211 Finance - Debt Service Division 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.120.211.07 TAXES/INSURANCE/MISC
100.120.211.07.733 CAP LEASE-ENTERPRISE PROG 31,148 190,866 160,000 127,600 80% 121,400 Total Taxes/Insurance/Misc 31,148 190,866 160,000 127,600 79.8% 121,400 100.120.211.08 CAPITAL EQUIP/PROJECTS
100.120.211.08.998 GASB 96 - CAPITAL OUTLAY SBITA ASSET 137,517 - - - #DIV/0! - 100.120.211.08.999 GASB 87 - CAPITAL OUTLAY LEASE ASSET 627,672 667,355 - - #DIV/0! - Total Capital Equip/Projects 765,189 667,355 - - #DIV/0! - Department Total 796,337 858,221 160,000 127,600 79.8% 121,400 Debt Service
28 15.a
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 120 Finance Department Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 212 City Treasurer Division 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.120.212.01 SALARIES
100.120.212.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 5,500 6,000 6,000 6,000 100% 6,000 100.120.212.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 11,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 100% 12,000 Total Salaries 16,500 18,000 18,000 18,000 100.0% 18,000 100.120.212.02 BENEFITS
100.120.212.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 793 1,015 1,000 1,000 100% 1,000 100.120.212.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 161 145 175 175 100% 175 100.120.212.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 85 71 125 125 100% 125 Total Benefits 1,038 1,231 1,300 1,300 100.0% 1,300
100.120.212.06 SERVICES
100.120.212.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 14,446 7,941 15,000 15,000 100% 15,000 100.120.212.06.644 IT COST ALLOCATION 4,230 4,526 5,100 - 0% - Total Services 18,676 12,467 20,100 15,000 74.6% 15,000 Department Total 36,215 31,698 39,400 34,300 87.1% 34,300 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

City Treasurer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total FTE's: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
City Treasurer
29 15.a
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 120 Finance Department Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 213 Central Services 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.120.213.04 COMMUNICATIONS
100.120.213.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 17,884 20,779 18,650 20,925 112% 20,925 Total Communications 17,884 20,779 18,650 20,925 112.2% 20,925 100.120.213.05 SUPPLIES
100.120.213.05.501 OFFICE SUPPLIES 45,823 46,642 51,000 51,000 100% 51,000 100.120.213.05.510 POSTAGE 18,099 26,383 25,000 9,000 36% 10,000 100.120.213.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 860 1,362 1,165 1,500 129% 1,500 Total Supplies 64,782 74,388 77,165 61,500 79.7% 62,500 100.120.213.06 SERVICES
100.120.213.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 41,931 54,468 28,500 20,000 70% 21,000 Total Services 41,931 54,468 28,500 20,000 70.2% 21,000 100.120.213.07 TAXES/INSURANCE/MISCELLANEOUS
100.120.213.07.704 CALPERS RETIREMENT ROUNDING - - - - #DIV/0! - 100.120.213.07.705 LOSSES/CLAIMS 26 195 500 150 30% 200 100.120.213.07.706 BAD DEBT EXPENDITURE 16,360 49,141 35,000 - 0% - Total Taxes/Insurance/Misc. 16,386 49,336 35,500 150 0.4% 200 100.120.213.08 CAPITAL EQUIP/PROJECTS
100.120.213.08.802 TYLER ERP - - 230,500 138,000 60% 230,500 100.120.213.08.803 TYLER EPL - - 100,873 44,000 44% 100,873 Total Taxes/Insurance/Misc. - - 331,373 182,000 0.0% 331,373 Department Total 140,982 198,971 491,188 284,575 57.9% 435,998 Central Services
30 15.a
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 130 Police Department Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 321 Police Uniform Division 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.130.321.01 SALARIES
100.130.321.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 3,868,152 3,732,789 3,917,900 3,917,900 100% 4,207,400 100.130.321.01.103 OVERTIME 501,150 75,500 - 200,000 #DIV/0! 350,000 100.130.321.01.105 OVERTIME-PROP 30 - 19,868 - - #DIV/0! - 100.130.321.01.107 OVERTIME-COURT 37,738 37,274 25,000 29,000 116% 26,250 100.130.321.01.108 SALARIES CASUAL - 5 15,000 - 0% -
100.130.321.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 371,286 340,765 378,000 378,000 100% 378,000 100.130.321.01.110 OVERTIME-SPECIAL EVENT 1,891 - - - #DIV/0! - 100.130.321.01.111 STANDBY BASIC 45,502 76,228 75,000 75,000 100% 75,000 100.130.321.01.113 OVERTIME - TANGER OUTLET 16,550 45,315 40,000 40,000 100% 41,000 100.130.321.01.114 OVERTIME - FBI - 12,474 8,000 8,000 100% - 100.130.321.01.115 OT-PUBLIC SFTY CANNABIS REGLTN (50%OF3% - - - 11,250 #DIV/0! - 100.130.321.01.120 OVERTIME - CHP CANNABIS GRANT - - - 8,500 #DIV/0! - Total Salaries 4,842,270 4,340,219 4,458,900 4,667,650 104.7% 5,077,650 100.130.321.02 BENEFITS
100.130.321.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 682,182 710,989 733,600 733,600 100% 750,400 100.130.321.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 10,742 9,875 11,100 11,100 100% 11,900 100.130.321.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 132,906 164,886 250,705 25,705 10% 258,655 100.130.321.02.206 BENEFITS - DEFERRED COMP 13,876 15,580 12,900 12,900 100% 14,000 100.130.321.02.207 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 50,385 42,864 47,300 47,300 100% 47,000 100.130.321.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 131,520 135,537 119,400 119,400 100% 127,300 100.130.321.02.211 BENEFITS-PARS - - 1,000 1,000 100% - 100.130.321.02.213 BILINGUAL SERVICES 900 7,171 7,500 7,500 100% 7,800 100.130.321.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 39,447 38,838 45,300 45,300 100% 52,700 100.130.321.02.215 SICK LEAVE PAY OUT 70,868 82,019 - - #DIV/0! - 100.130.321.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 151,859 228,756 - - #DIV/0! - 100.130.321.02.220 RETIREE HEALTH - PEMCHA 61,368 62,456 55,000 51,000 93% 55,000 100.130.321.02.222 RETIREE HEALTH COMPENSATION 108,456 104,613 110,000 116,000 105% 117,000 100.130.321.02.227 PENSION UNFUNDED LIABILITY 332,395 8,402 267,542 267,542 100% 529,816 Total Benefits 1,786,903 1,611,986 1,661,347 1,438,347 86.6% 1,971,571 100.130.321.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
100.130.321.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES 26,356 35,955 5,500 5,500 100% 13,500 100.130.321.03.305 DUES/SUBS/MEMBERSHIPS 1,050 1,585 - - #DIV/0! 7,670 Total Employee Development 27,406 37,540 5,500 5,500 100.0% 21,170 100.130.321.04 COMMUNICATIONS
100.130.321.04.400 CAL-ID COMMUNICATIONS 28,562 29,738 35,500 29,404 83% 30,000 Total Employee Development 28,562 29,738 35,500 29,404 82.8% 30,000 100.130.321.05 SUPPLIES
100.130.321.05.501 OFFICE SUPPLIES 6,518 6,111 6,500 - 0% - 100.130.321.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 1,426 1,309 - - #DIV/0! 1,650 100.130.321.05.526 AMMUNITION & RANGE SUPPLIES 7,288 - - - #DIV/0! - Total Employee Development 15,231 7,420 6,500 - 0.0% 1,650 100.130.321.06 SERVICES
100.130.321.06.601 VEHICLE FUEL COST 170,440 169,125 184,360 150,000 81% 175,000 100.130.321.06.608 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE COST 77,252 98,613 100,000 75,000 75% 75,000 100.130.321.06.611 RESERVE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 994 248 1,000 500 50% 1,000 100.130.321.06.612 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 1,829 - 3,700 150 4% 500 100.130.321.06.626 PROF SERV. LEGAL 74,705 241,498 100,000 125,000 125% 125,000 100.130.321.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 99,355 95,211 6,700 900 13% 45,000 100.130.321.06.640 DISCRETIONARY SERVICES 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 100% 2,500 100.130.321.06.644 IT COST ALLOCATION 137,803 158,150 92,000 92,000 100% 87,000 100.130.321.06.645 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 12,039 12,232 1,000 620 62% 750 100.130.321.06.646 CITATION COLLECTION FEE - 732 500 150 30% 250 100.130.321.06.647 CROSSING GUARD CONTRACT 5,000 5,000 - - #DIV/0! - Total Services 581,916 783,310 491,760 446,820 90.9% 512,000 100.130.321.07 TAXES/INSURANCE/MISC.
100.130.321.07.733 CAP-LEASE-ENTERPRISE PROG 82,187 148,866 140,000 164,000 117% 233,300 100.130.321.07.762 EXPLORER PROGRAM 1,183 2,255 - - #DIV/0! - Total Taxes/Insurance/Misc. 83,370 151,122 140,000 164,000 117.1% 233,300 100.130.321.08 CAPITAL EQUIP/PROJECTS
100.130.321.08.817 UNMARKED VEHICLE-PROP 30 67,120 - - - #DIV/0! - 100.130.321.08.818 BODY WORN CAMERAS - - 70,000 - 0% -
Total Capital Equip/Projects 67,120 - 70,000 - 0.0% -
100.130.321.09 TRANSFERS/CONTINGENCY/CONTRAS
100.130.321.09.302 TRANSFERS TO DEBT SERVICE 1,109,025 1,111,811 1,110,291 1,110,291 100% 1,111,697 Total Transfers/Contengency/Contras 1,109,025 1,111,811 1,110,291 1,110,291 100.0% 1,111,697 Department Total 8,541,803 8,073,146 7,979,798 7,862,012 98.5% 8,959,038 Police Department - Police Uniform Division
31 15.a
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Police Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Captain 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Lieutenant 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Police Sergeant 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Police Corporal 7.00 7.00 5.00 5.00
Police Detective 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00
Police Officer 19.00 19.00 19.00 20.00
Police Officer Trainee 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Total FTE's: 38.00 38.00 37.00 38.00
Police Department - Police Uniform Division
32 15.a
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 130 Police Department Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 322 School Resource Division 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.130.322.01 SALARIES
100.130.322.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 196,484 246,964 317,300 317,300 100% 208,700 100.130.322.01.103 OVERTIME 13,095 22,915 25,000 25,000 100% 25,625 100.130.322.01.104 OVERTIME, SRO 37,548 24,949 40,000 40,000 100% 41,000 100.130.322.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 19,125 26,750 36,000 36,000 100% 21,000 Total Salaries 266,252 321,577 418,300 418,300 100.0% 296,325 100.130.322.02 BENEFITS
100.130.322.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 22,617 34,458 41,400 41,400 100% 27,500 100.130.322.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 603 725 1,000 1,000 100% 700 100.130.322.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP - - 12,440 12,440 100% 12,834 100.130.322.02.207 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 2,400 2,400 3,600 3,600 100% 2,900 100.130.322.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 6,812 8,345 9,600 9,600 100% 6,400 100.130.322.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 2,314 2,834 3,700 3,700 100% 2,700 Total Benefits 34,746 48,761 71,740 71,740 100.0% 53,034 Department Total 300,998 370,339 490,040 490,040 100.0% 349,359 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

School Resource Officer 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Total FTE's: 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Police Department - School Resource Division
CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
School Resource Division
The School Resource Division is used to account for the agreement between the City of Barstow Police Department and the Barstow Unified School District (BUSD). With this Agreement, three sworn Peace Officers are provided to serve as the School Resource Officer(s) (SRO). The Officers are assigned one of the three school divisions: Barstow High School, Barstow Junior High, and the elementary schools. Currently, the Police Department assigns two Officers as SROs, as the Agreement outlines that the third position is determined based on department staffing levels. The Agreement states that BUSD will reimburse the City for fifty percent (50%) of the Officer's actual cost incurred by the City. 33 15.a
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 130 Police Department Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 323 Police Dispatch Division 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.130.323.01 SALARIES
100.130.323.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 472,023 692,305 723,300 723,300 100% 733,800 100.130.323.01.103 OVERTIME 76,566 13,753 - - #DIV/0! 125,000 100.130.323.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 70,750 103,214 108,000 108,000 100% 99,000 Total Salaries 619,338 809,271 831,300 831,300 100.0% 957,800 100.130.323.02 BENEFITS
100.130.323.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 45,682 74,660 79,200 79,200 100% 80,900 100.130.323.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 1,694 2,358 2,400 2,400 100% 2,500 100.130.323.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 21,127 25,176 40,179 40,179 100% 41,453 100.130.323.02.206 BENEFITS - DEFERRED COMP 917 1,043 1,100 1,100 100% 1,200 100.130.323.02.207 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 5,292 6,701 6,900 6,900 100% 6,900 100.130.323.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 10,798 14,578 12,900 12,900 100% 13,000 100.130.323.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 6,312 8,779 8,500 8,500 100% 9,300 100.130.323.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 5,494 18,105 - - #DIV/0! - Total Benefits 97,316 151,400 151,179 151,179 100.0% 155,253 100.130.323.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
100.130.323.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES 5,235 5,190 3,455 - 0% 5,000 100.130.323.03.305 DUES/SUBS/MEMBERSHIPS 75 - 250 250 100% 225 Total Employment Development 5,310 5,190 3,705 250 6.7% 5,225 100.130.323.04 COMMUNICATIONS
100.130.323.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 131,424 139,706 149,000 158,500 106% 158,500 Total Communications 131,424 139,706 149,000 158,500 106.4% 158,500 100.130.323.05 SUPPLIES
100.130.323.05.501 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,724 1,465 2,000 - 0% - Total Communications 1,724 1,465 2,000 - 0.0% -
100.130.323.06 SERVICES
100.130.323.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 1,680 1,680 1,700 - 0% 1,700 100.130.323.06.644 IT COST ALLOCATION 19,989 10,894 - - #DIV/0! - Total Services 21,668 12,574 1,700 - 0.0% 1,700
Department Total 876,780 1,119,605 1,138,884 1,141,229 100.2% 1,278,478 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Police Services Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Dispatcher 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Dispatcher 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00
Total FTE's: 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Police Department - Police Dispatch Division
34 15.a
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 130 Police Department Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 324 Police Admin Division 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.130.324.01 SALARIES
100.130.324.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 462,278 408,157 441,700 441,700 100.0% 528,000 100.130.324.01.103 OVERTIME 22,549 15,347 20,000 20,000 100.0% 20,000 100.130.324.01.108 SALARIES CASUAL - 13,732 6,000 5,000 83.3% 5,500 100.130.324.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 71,875 63,500 63,000 63,000 100.0% 69,000 Total Salaries 556,702 500,737 530,700 529,700 99.8% 622,500 100.130.324.02 BENEFITS
100.130.324.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 45,732 39,455 43,500 43,500 100.0% 50,100 100.130.324.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 1,872 1,542 1,600 1,600 100.0% 1,900 100.130.324.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 15,406 17,778 28,373 28,373 100.0% 29,272 100.130.324.02.207 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 4,090 4,536 4,600 4,600 100.0% 5,300 100.130.324.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 7,718 6,985 7,000 7,000 100.0% 8,200 100.130.324.02.211 BENEFITS-PARS - 179 - - #DIV/0! -
100.130.324.02.213 BILINGUAL SERVICES - - 500 500 100.0% - 100.130.324.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 5,320 4,643 5,300 5,300 100.0% 6,800 100.130.324.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 1,781 1,314 - - #DIV/0! - Total Benefits 81,920 76,431 90,873 90,873 100.0% 101,572 100.130.324.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
100.130.324.03.301 TRAVEL / TRAINING EXPENDITURES 10,683 8,188 9,800 - 0.0% 25,500 100.130.324.03.305 DUES/SUBS/MEMBERSHIPS - 77 250 - 0.0% 140 Total Employee Development 10,683 8,264 10,050 - 0.0% 25,640 100.130.324.05 SUPPLIES
100.130.324.05.501 OFFICE SUPPLIES 8,063 7,769 6,200 - 0.0% - 100.130.324.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 1,737 1,472 2,000 - 0.0% 4,368 Total Supplies 9,800 9,241 8,200 - 0.0% 4,368
100.130.324.06 SERVICES
100.130.324.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 3,447 5,353 6,200 - 0.0% 6,000 Total Supplies 3,447 5,353 6,200 - 0.0% 6,000
Department Total 662,552 600,026 646,023 620,573 96.1% 760,080 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Senior Administrative Asst. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Services Asst. 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Community Service Officer 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Sr. Crime Scene Evidence Tech. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Crime Scene Evidence Tech. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total FTE's: 7.00 6.00 6.00 7.00
Police Department - Police Administration Division
35 15.a
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 130 Police Department Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 350 Animal Regulation 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.130.350.01 SALARIES
100.130.350.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR - - 40,000 15,000 38% - 100.130.350.01.103 OVERTIME - - 2,500 300 12% -
100.130.350.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET - - 10,000 2,500 25% - Total Salaries - - 52,500 17,800 33.9% -
100.130.324.02 BENEFITS
100.130.350.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT - - 4,400 2,200 50% - 100.130.350.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE - - 300 75 25% - 100.130.350.02.207 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE - - 760 760 100% - 100.130.350.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE - - 300 300 100% - 100.130.350.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS - - 200 200 100% - Total Benefits - - 5,960 3,535 59.3% -
100.130.350.03
100.130.350.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES - - 3,000 - 0% - Total Travel/Training - - 3,000 - -
100.130.350.05 SUPPLIES
100.130.350.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES - 4,473 5,500 800 15% - Total Supplies - 4,473 5,500 800 0.0% -
100.130.350.06 SERVICES
100.130.350.06.601 VEHICLE FUEL COST - - 5,000 - -
100.130.350.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 265,496 532,704 814,700 815,000 100% 740,000 100.130.350.06.645 SAFETY EQUIPMENT - - 1,500 - -
Total Services 265,496 532,704 821,200 815,000 99.2% 740,000 100.130.350.08 CAPITAL PROJECTS
100.130.350.08.808 VEHICLES - - 20,000 17,000 85% -
Total Capital Projects - - 20,000 17,000 85.0% -
100.130.350.14 ELECTRICITY
100.130.350.14.419 ELECTRICITY - 3,893 30,000 20,000 67% - Total Electricity - 3,893 30,000 20,000 0.0% -
100.130.350.24 NATURAL GAS
100.130.350.24.440 NATURAL GAS - 76 3,000 300 10% -
Total Natural Gas - 76 3,000 300 0.0% -
100.130.350.34 WATER
100.130.350.34.466 WATER - 1,165 15,000 6,000 40% -
Total Electricity - 1,165 15,000 6,000 0.0% -
Department Total 265,496 542,310 956,160 880,435 92.1% 740,000 Police Department - Animal Regulation Division
CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
Animal Regulation Division
The Animal Regulation Division is used to account for the agreement between the City of Barstow and the Barstow Humane Society (BHS). The City is proposing a renewal contract with the Barstow Humane Society for the Fiscal Year 2025-2026, to include general humane society and animal control officer services.
36 15.a
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 130 Police Department Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 380 Disaster Preparedness 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.130.380.04 COMMUNICATIONS
100.130.380.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 3,861 4,140 3,825 4,625 121% 4,625 Total Communications 3,861 4,140 3,825 4,625 121% 4,625 Department Total 3,861 4,140 3,825 4,625 121% 4,625
Police Department - Disaster Preparedness Division
37 15.a
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 140 Comm Services Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 423 Traffic Sig & Street Lts 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.140.423.06 SERVICES
100.140.423.06.612 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 57,643 56,036 80,000 80,000 100.0% 85,000 100.140.423.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 9,458 14,183 15,000 15,000 100.0% 15,000 Total Services 67,101 70,219 95,000 95,000 100.0% 100,000 100.140.423.14 ELECTRICITY
100.140.423.14.403 ELECTRICITY-SIGNAL LIGHT 35,876 39,450 35,000 34,075 97.4% 35,000 100.140.423.14.420 ELECTRICITY-STREETS LIGHTS 189,565 205,537 175,000 192,025 109.7% 192,000 Total Electricity 225,441 244,987 210,000 226,100 107.7% 227,000 Department Total 292,541 315,206 305,000 321,100 105.3% 327,000 Traffic Signals and Street Lights
38 15.a
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 140 Comm Services Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 425 Street Maintenance 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.140.425.01 SALARIES
100.140.425.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 592,418 751,666 699,000 699,000 100% 729,700 100.140.425.01.103 OVERTIME 22,980 18,878 30,000 30,000 100% 30,750 100.140.425.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 93,750 114,000 102,000 102,000 100% 105,000 100.140.425.01.110 OT SPECIAL EVENT 3,028 4,141 5,000 5,000 100% 5,000 100.140.425.01.111 STANDBY BASIC 5,748 10,666 11,000 11,000 100% 11,000 Total Salaries 717,924 899,350 847,000 847,000 100.0% 881,450 100.140.425.02 BENEFITS
100.140.425.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 58,624 79,784 70,400 70,400 100% 74,200 100.140.425.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 2,400 2,721 2,500 250 10% 2,600 100.140.425.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 22,821 29,081 46,411 46,411 100% 47,883 100.140.425.02.206 BENEFITS - DEFERRED COMP 1,531 2,065 2,200 2,200 100% 2,300 100.140.425.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 12,622 15,751 13,900 13,900 100% 14,600 100.140.425.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 6,765 8,340 8,100 8,100 100% 9,200 100.140.425.02.215 SICK LEAVE PAY OUT 18,858 - - - #DIV/0! - 100.140.425.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 38,244 37,005 - - #DIV/0! - Total Benefits 161,864 174,747 143,511 141,261 98.4% 150,783 100.140.425.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
100.140.425.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES 21,674 615 18,350 10,000 54% 5,700 100.140.425.03.305 DUES/SUBS/MEMBERSHIPS - - 1,200 500 42% 1,200 Total Employee Development 21,674 615 19,550 10,500 53.7% 6,900 100.140.425.04 COMMUNICATIONS
100.140.425.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 3,966 3,340 3,125 3,300 106% 3,300 Total Communications 3,966 3,340 3,125 3,300 105.6% 3,300 100.140.425.05 SUPPLIES
100.140.425.05.501 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,647 348 2,000 2,000 100% 3,000 100.140.425.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 108,524 142,580 170,200 160,000 94% 106,000 Total Supplies 110,171 142,928 172,200 162,000 94.1% 109,000 100.140.425.06 SERVICES
100.140.425.06.612 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 4,944 1,515 12,500 12,500 100% 12,500 100.140.425.06.620 RENTALS/LEASES 15,237 10,852 18,000 14,000 78% 25,000 100.140.425.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 19,946 18,853 30,000 25,000 83% 18,300 100.140.425.06.644 IT COST ALLOCATION 2,768 1,425 4,350 - 0% 3,244 100.140.425.06.645 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 6,200 6,398 10,000 8,500 85% 10,000 Total Services 49,095 39,043 74,850 60,000 80.2% 69,044 100.140.425.14 ELECTRICITY
100.140.425.14.418 ELECTRICITY-CORP YARD 18,443 20,203 21,000 20,475 98% 21,000 Total Electricity 18,443 20,203 21,000 20,475 97.5% 21,000 100.140.425.24 NATURAL GAS
100.140.425.24.441 NATURAL GAS-CORP YARD 13,975 10,994 14,000 11,250 80% 14,000 Total Natural Gas 13,975 10,994 14,000 11,250 80.4% 14,000 100.140.425.34 WATER
100.140.425.34.463 WATER-TRUCK FILL 8,268 9,655 11,000 10,310 94% 11,000 100.140.425.34.464 WATER-CORP YARD 10,864 14,376 14,200 13,600 96% 14,200 Total Water 19,133 24,031 25,200 23,910 94.9% 25,200
Department Total 1,116,245 1,315,252 1,320,436 1,279,696 96.9% 1,280,677 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Public Works Superintendent 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Field Services Supervisor 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Assistant 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Public Services Asst. I 7.00 7.00 4.00 4.00
Public Services Asst. II 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00
Public Services Asst. III 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Total FTE's: 11.00 11.00 10.00 10.00
Street Maintenance Division
39 15.a
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 140 Comm Services Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 430 Open Spaces 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.140.430.01 SALARIES
100.140.430.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 326,329 363,979 511,400 511,400 100.0% 520,100 100.140.430.01.103 OVERTIME 12,590 2,555 10,000 10,000 100.0% 10,250 100.140.430.01.108 SALARIES CASUAL 22,784 - 34,000 34,000 100.0% 34,000 100.140.430.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 64,000 73,938 93,000 93,000 100.0% 84,000 100.140.430.01.110 PARK MAINTENANCE 1,308 1,382 1,500 1,500 100.0% 1,500 100.140.430.01.111 STANDBY BASIC 585 1,602 4,000 4,000 100.0% 4,000 Total Salaries 427,596 443,455 653,900 653,900 100.0% 653,850 100.140.430.02 BENEFITS
100.140.430.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 30,619 27,266 47,300 47,300 100.0% 47,400 100.140.430.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 1,390 1,566 1,900 1,900 100.0% 2,000 100.140.430.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 12,474 18,705 29,852 29,852 100.0% 30,799 100.140.430.02.206 BENEFITS - DEFERRED COMP 268 826 900 900 100.0% 900 100.140.430.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 6,442 6,137 9,400 9,400 100.0% 9,300 100.140.430.02.211 BENEFITS-PARS 297 - 200 400 200.0% 400 100.140.430.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 3,624 3,441 6,200 6,200 100.0% 6,600 100.140.430.02.215 SICK LEAVE PAY OUT 37,108 - - - 0.0% - 100.140.430.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 26,902 6,138 - - 0.0% - Total Benefits 119,125 64,078 95,752 95,952 100.2% 97,399 100.140.430.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
100.140.430.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES 5,506 4,821 9,800 3,000 30.6% 5,100 Total Employee Development 5,506 4,821 9,800 3,000 30.6% 5,100 100.140.430.04 COMMUNICATIONS
100.140.430.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 1,714 1,291 1,300 1,275 98.1% 1,300 Total Communications 1,714 1,291 1,300 1,275 98.1% 1,300 100.140.430.05 SUPPLIES
100.140.430.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 40,463 34,320 2,000 2,000 100.0% 20,000 100.140.430.05.526 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES/DANA PARK 966 - - - 0.0% - 100.140.430.05.527 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES/H STREET 1,157 - - - 0.0% - 100.140.430.05.529 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES/STURNACLE 1,970 - - - 0.0% - 100.140.430.05.530 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES/FOGLESONG 984 - - - 0.0% - 100.140.430.05.531 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES/LILLIAN 497 - - - 0.0% - 100.140.430.05.532 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES/JASPER 377 - - - 0.0% - 100.140.430.05.533 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES/COUNTY PARKS 2,427 - - - 0.0% - Total Supplies 48,840 34,320 2,000 2,000 100.0% 20,000
100.140.430.06 SERVICES
100.140.430.06.612 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 12,262 9,938 - - #DIV/0! 5,000 100.140.430.06.613 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE-DANA 555 - - - 0.0% - 100.140.430.06.616 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE-FOGLESONG 3,450 - - - 0.0% - 100.140.430.06.617 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE-LILLIAN 843 - - - 0.0% - 100.140.430.06.618 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE-JASPER 76 - - - 0.0% - 100.140.430.06.619 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE-COUNTY PARKS 971 - - - 0.0% - 100.140.430.06.620 RENTALS/LEASES 1,568 1,569 16,000 10,000 62.5% 16,000 100.140.430.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 17,155 15,865 - - #DIV/0! 75,000 100.140.430.06.645 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 2,597 2,522 13,500 13,500 100.0% 12,000 Total Services 39,477 29,895 29,500 23,500 79.7% 108,000 100.140.430.14 ELECTRICITY
100.140.430.14.421 ELECTRICITY-HIGHLAND TRAILS 126 6 - - 0.0% - 100.140.430.14.424 ELECTRICITY-2ND ST PARK 1,054 1,375 - - 0.0% - 100.140.430.14.425 ELECTRICITY-RIMROCK MEDIAN 83 75 - - 0.0% - 100.140.430.14.426 ELECTRICITY-MONTEREY RD AREA 73 71 - - 0.0% - 100.140.430.14.474 2218 MURIEL DR - IRRIGATION 62 30 - - 0.0% - Total Electricity 1,398 1,557 - - 0.0% -
100.140.430.34 WATER
100.140.430.34.467 WATER - CITY PROJ AREAS 19,267 29,019 - - 0.0% - 100.140.430.34.469 WATER - LENWOOD RD X SERRANO 5,428 6,021 - - 0.0% - 100.140.430.34.470 WATER - VISTA 3,610 3,610 - - 0.0% - 100.140.430.34.473 WATER - MONTEREY ROAD AREA 2,608 2,994 - - 0.0% - 100.140.430.34.474 MURIEL @ BROADWAY IRRIGATION 4,143 3,606 - - 0.0% - 100.140.430.34.475 LENWOOD & MAIN IRRIGATION 3,682 3,152 - - 0.0% - Total Water 38,737 48,401 - - 0.0% -
Department Total 682,392 627,818 792,252 779,627 98.4% 885,649 Open Spaces Maintenance Division
40 15.a
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Park & Open Space Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Public Services Asst. I 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00
Public Services Asst. II 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Public Services Asst. III 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total FTE's: 7.00 7.00 8.00 8.00
Open Spaces Maintenance Division
41 15.a
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 140 Comm Services Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 435 Building Maintenance 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.140.435.01 SALARIES
100.140.435.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 234,443 288,034 296,000 296,000 100.0% 292,400 100.140.435.01.103 OVERTIME 6,336 4,446 5,000 5,000 100.0% 5,125 100.140.435.01.108 SALARIES CASUAL - - 15,000 - 0.0% -
100.140.435.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 39,000 47,256 48,000 48,000 100.0% 45,000 Total Salaries 279,779 339,736 364,000 349,000 95.9% 342,525 100.140.435.02 BENEFITS .
100.140.435.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 27,244 34,000 35,500 35,500 100.0% 29,800 100.140.435.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 869 995 1,100 1,100 100.0% 1,100 100.140.435.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 12,344 12,477 19,912 19,912 100.0% 20,544 100.140.435.02.206 BENEFITS - DEFERRED COMP 366 848 900 900 100.0% 900 100.140.435.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 5,027 5,636 6,000 6,000 100.0% 5,900 100.140.435.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 2,547 2,963 3,500 3,500 100.0% 3,800 100.140.435.02.215 SICK LEAVE PAY OUT 6,139 - - - 0.0% - 100.140.435.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 25,957 276 - - 0.0% - Total Benefits 80,493 57,195 66,912 66,912 100.0% 62,044 100.140.435.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
100.140.435.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES 11,443 2,869 12,000 5,000 41.7% 10,154 Total Employee Development 11,443 2,869 12,000 5,000 0.0% 10,154 100.140.435.04 COMMUNICATIONS
100.140.435.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 1,223 1,336 1,250 1,475 118.0% 1,475 Total Communications 1,223 1,336 1,250 1,475 118.0% 1,475 100.140.435.05 SUPPLIES
100.140.435.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 44,507 68,023 91,700 90,000 98.1% 58,000 100.140.435.05.527 HARVEY HSE TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 2,633 26 - - 0.0% - Total Supplies 47,140 68,049 91,700 90,000 98.1% 58,000 100.140.435.06 SERVICES
100.140.435.06.612 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 42,573 59,291 55,000 55,000 100.0% 70,000 100.140.435.06.620 RENTALS/LEASES 98 - 4,000 1,500 37.5% 1,500 100.140.435.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 82,760 138,739 94,000 94,000 100.0% 94,000 100.140.435.06.631 FEES/SERVICES-HARVEY HOUSE 9,368 - - - 0.0% - 100.140.435.06.645 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 639 2,157 8,500 5,000 58.8% 7,000 Total Services 135,438 200,187 161,500 155,500 96.3% 172,500 100.140.435.08 CAPITAL EQUIP/PROJECTS
100.140.435.08.801 HARVEY HOUSE IMPROVEMENTS 7,317 - 63,500 - 0.0% - 100.140.435.08.802 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 246,452 - - - 0.0% - 100.140.435.08.804 HVAC / EVAP COOLERS 39,869 91,870 36,500 - 0.0% - Total Capital Equip/Projects 293,638 91,870 100,000 - 0.0% - 100.140.435.14 ELECTRICITY
100.140.435.14.419 ELECTRICITY 108,878 118,728 105,000 89,350 85.1% 105,000 Total Electricity 108,878 118,728 105,000 89,350 85.1% 105,000 100.140.435.24 NATURAL GAS
100.140.435.24.440 NATURAL GAS 13,736 8,392 11,000 10,725 97.5% 11,000 Total Natural Gas 13,736 8,392 11,000 10,725 97.5% 11,000 100.140.435.34 WATER
100.140.435.34.466 WATER 22,631 36,504 38,000 34,050 89.6% 38,000 Total Water 22,631 36,504 38,000 34,050 89.6% 38,000
Department Total 994,401 924,866 951,362 802,012 84.3% 800,698 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Facility Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Public Services Asst. I 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00
Public Services Asst. II 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00
Public Services Asst. III 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total FTE's: 5.00 5.00 4.00 4.00
Building Maintenance Division
42 15.a
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 140 Comm Services Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 440 Fleet Maintenance 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.140.440.01 SALARIES
100.140.440.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 231,895 277,457 287,600 287,600 100.0% 271,600 100.140.440.01.103 OVERTIME 1,758 481 1,000 1,000 100.0% 1,025 100.140.440.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 28,750 33,000 33,000 33,000 100.0% 33,000 100.140.440.01.110 OVERTIME-SPECIAL EVENT - 466 500 - 0.0% - Total Salaries 262,403 311,404 322,100 321,600 99.8% 305,625 100.140.440.02 BENEFITS
100.140.440.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 23,009 28,928 30,200 30,200 100.0% 21,300 100.140.440.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 683 865 900 900 100.0% 900 100.140.440.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 9,554 9,921 15,832 15,832 100.0% 16,334 100.140.440.02.206 BENEFITS - DEFERRED COMP 818 983 1,100 1,100 100.0% 1,100 100.140.440.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 5,541 5,306 5,900 5,900 100.0% 5,800 100.140.440.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 2,181 2,655 3,300 3,300 100.0% 3,400 100.140.440.02.215 SICK LEAVE PAY OUT 27,522 - - - 0.0% - 100.140.440.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 15,054 4,744 - - 0.0% - Total Benefits 84,362 53,401 57,232 57,232 100.0% 48,834 100.140.440.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
100.140.440.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES 2,034 7,167 11,200 3,000 26.8% 13,119 Total Employee Development 2,034 7,167 11,200 3,000 26.8% 13,119 100.140.440.04 COMMUNICATIONS
100.140.440.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 1,229 1,153 1,050 1,275 121.4% 1,275 Total Communications 1,229 1,153 1,050 1,275 121.4% 1,275 100.140.440.05 SUPPLIES
100.140.440.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 8,531 17,471 9,300 9,300 100.0% 7,300 100.140.440.05.530 COST OF GOODS 67,154 44,301 70,000 - 0.0% - 100.140.440.05.531 CONSUMABLES 3,546 5,176 5,500 4,000 72.7% 5,500 Total Supplies 79,231 66,948 84,800 13,300 15.7% 12,800 100.140.440.06 SERVICES
100.140.440.06.601 VEHICLE FUEL COST 124,120 130,554 120,000 90,000 75.0% 100,000 100.140.440.06.608 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE COST 82,036 100,486 85,000 80,000 94.1% 85,000 100.140.440.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 7,336 12,424 11,550 11,550 100.0% 23,000 100.140.440.06.644 IT COST ALLOCATION 1,500 15,139 16,000 6,000 37.5% 14,080 100.140.440.06.645 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 1,956 1,919 2,600 2,600 100.0% 2,600 Total Services 216,949 260,523 235,150 190,150 80.9% 224,680 Department Total 646,208 700,595 711,532 586,557 82.4% 606,333 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Fleet Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Fleet Mechanic 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fleet Mechanic 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total FTE's: 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Fleet Maintenance Division
43 15.a
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 150 Comm Development Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 501 Comm Dev Admin 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.150.501.01 SALARIES
100.150.501.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 222,056 294,535 315,900 315,900 100.0% 488,300 100.150.501.01.103 OVERTIME 1,003 488 1,000 1,000 100.0% 1,025 100.150.501.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 32,000 39,000 39,000 39,000 100.0% 48,000 Total Salaries 255,059 334,024 355,900 355,900 100.0% 537,325 100.150.501.02 BENEFITS
100.150.501.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 16,110 22,527 24,600 24,600 100.0% 51,700 100.150.501.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 880 1,041 1,100 1,100 100.0% 1,600 100.150.501.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 6,351 14,766 23,565 23,565 100.0% 24,313 100.150.501.02.206 BENEFITS - DEFERRED COMP 1,071 1,712 1,900 1,900 100.0% 3,700 100.150.501.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 5,533 7,634 7,600 7,600 100.0% 13,000 100.150.501.02.213 BILINGUAL SERVICES - - 1,000 1,000 100.0% 8,200 100.150.501.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 2,487 3,291 3,700 3,700 100.0% 6,200 100.150.501.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 3,374 4,610 - - 0.0% - Total Benefits 35,805 55,580 63,465 63,465 100.0% 108,713 100.150.501.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
100.150.501.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES 608 4,047 - - #DIV/0! 2,000 Total Employee Development 608 4,047 - - #DIV/0! 2,000
100.150.501.05 SUPPLIES
100.150.501.05.501 OFFICE SUPPLIES 2,592 1,428 500 750 150.0% 750 Total Supplies 2,592 1,428 500 750 150.0% 750
Department Total 294,064 395,079 419,865 420,115 100.1% 648,788 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Planning & Comm. Dev. Administrator 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Community Development Manager 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Economic Development Specialist 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Assistant 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total FTE's: 6.00 4.00 5.00 5.00
Community Development Administration Division
44 15.a
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 150 Comm Development Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 505 Engineering 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.150.505.01 SALARIES
100.150.505.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 123,353 59,963 - - 0% - 100.150.505.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 11,500 6,000 - - 0% - Total Salaries 134,853 65,963 - - 0.0% -
100.150.505.02 BENEFITS
100.150.505.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 16,192 9,439 - - 0% - 100.150.505.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 358 150 - - 0% - 100.150.505.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 3,946 4,522 7,217 7,217 100% 7,446 100.150.505.02.206 BENEFITS - DEFERRED COMP 1,129 589 - - 0% - 100.150.505.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 3,528 3,833 - - 0% - 100.150.505.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 1,195 655 - - 0% - 100.150.505.02.215 SICK LEAVE PAY OUT - 33,252 - - 0% - 100.150.505.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 6,918 26,347 - - 0% - Total Benefits 33,265 78,787 7,217 7,217 100.0% 7,446
100.150.505.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
100.150.505.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES 50 - - - 0% - Total Employee Development 50 - - - 0.0% -
100.150.505.04 COMMUNICATIONS
100.150.505.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 494 226 425 - 0% -
Total Communications 494 226 425 - 0.0% -
100.150.505.05 SUPPLIES
100.150.505.05.520 ADS/PUBLICATIONS 2,855 - 10,000 8,500 85% 10,000 100.150.505.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES - 254 1,000 1,000 100% 1,000 Total Supplies 2,855 254 11,000 9,500 86.4% 11,000
100.150.505.06 SERVICES
100.150.505.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 185,624 156,296 315,000 315,000 100% 385,000 100.150.505.06.644 IT COST ALLOCATION 867 4,425 - - 0% 12,174 Total Services 186,491 160,721 315,000 315,000 100.0% 397,174 Department Total 358,008 305,951 333,642 331,717 99.4% 415,620 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Engineering Svcs. Administrator 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Total FTE's: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Community Development - Engineering Division
45 15.a
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 150 Comm Development Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 511 Building and Safety 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.150.511.01 SALARIES
100.150.511.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 721,105 935,263 973,700 973,700 100.0% 1,010,800 100.150.511.01.103 OVERTIME 34,890 21,530 15,000 15,000 100.0% 15,375 100.150.511.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 81,748 111,250 114,000 114,000 100.0% 111,000 100.150.511.01.110 OVERTIME-SPECIAL EVENT - 144 250 250 100.0% - 100.150.511.01.111 STANDBY BASIC 22,136 26,689 30,000 30,000 100.0% 30,750 Total Salaries 859,878 1,094,876 1,132,950 1,132,950 100.0% 1,167,925 100.150.511.02 BENEFITS
100.150.511.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 71,056 96,009 101,200 101,200 100.0% 109,600 100.150.511.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 2,362 3,060 3,100 3,100 100.0% 3,300 100.150.511.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 23,349 40,335 64,371 64,371 100.0% 66,412 100.150.511.02.206 BENEFITS - DEFERRED COMP 2,649 2,878 3,000 3,000 100.0% 3,100 100.150.511.02.207 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 6,474 3,300 6,300 6,300 100.0% 6,300 100.150.511.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 16,215 20,302 19,400 19,400 100.0% 20,000 100.150.511.02.213 BILINGUAL SERVICES 1,320 7,274 8,700 8,700 100.0% 7,400 100.150.511.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 7,936 10,213 11,300 11,300 100.0% 12,700 100.150.511.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 19,865 25,165 - - 0.0% - Total Benefits 151,227 208,537 217,371 217,371 100.0% 228,812 100.150.511.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
100.150.511.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES 8,899 10,770 6,000 6,000 100.0% 7,000 100.150.511.03.302 ASA CASP TRAINING EXPENSES 25 - 4,000 - 0.0% 4,000 100.150.511.03.305 DUES/SUBS/MEMBERSHIPS 1,705 4,600 3,500 2,000 57.1% 4,500 Total Employee Development 10,629 15,370 13,500 8,000 59.3% 15,500 100.150.511.04 COMMUNICATIONS
100.150.511.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 5,911 7,746 7,800 9,000 115.4% 9,000 Total Communications 5,911 7,746 7,800 9,000 115.4% 9,000 100.150.511.05 SUPPLIES
100.150.511.05.501 OFFICE SUPPLIES 6,756 4,967 2,500 2,500 100.0% 2,500 100.150.511.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 1,883 1,035 2,500 2,000 80.0% 2,500 Total Supplies 8,639 6,003 5,000 4,500 90.0% 5,000
100.150.511.06 SERVICES
100.150.511.06.626 PROF SERV. LEGAL 17,885 43,442 100,000 - 0.0% - 100.150.511.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 36,524 25,587 25,000 25,000 100.0% 40,000 100.150.511.06.644 IT COST ALLOCATION 37,635 9,992 59,350 20,000 33.7% 60,000 100.150.511.06.645 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 1,141 469 2,500 2,250 90.0% 2,500 Total Services 93,184 79,490 186,850 47,250 25.3% 102,500 Department Total 1,129,468 1,412,021 1,563,471 1,419,071 90.8% 1,528,737 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Community Development Director 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
City Building Official/Fire Marshal 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Senior Comm. Dev. Inspector 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Community Dev. Inspector I 4.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Code Compliance Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Code Compliance Officer 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Total FTE's: 13.00 11.00 11.00 11.00
Community Development - Building and Safety Division
46 15.a
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 150 Comm Development Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 531 Planning 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.150.531.01 SALARIES
100.150.531.01.108 SALARIES CASUAL 155 - - - 0.0% -
Total Salaries 155 - - - #DIV/0! -
100.150.531.02 BENEFITS
100.150.531.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 2 - - - 0.0% -
Total Benefits 2 - - - #DIV/0! -
100.150.531.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
100.150.531.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES 758 3,470 4,000 1,500 37.5% 4,500 100.150.531.03.302 TRAVEL/MISC-PLAN COMMISSION 3,915 5,291 6,250 2,000 32.0% 6,250 100.150.531.03.305 DUES/SUBS/MEMBERSHIPS - 464 500 500 100.0% 500 Total Employee Development 4,673 9,225 10,750 4,000 37.2% 11,250 100.150.531.05 SUPPLIES
100.150.531.05.501 OFFICE SUPPLIES 258 1,145 500 500 100.0% 500 100.150.531.05.520 ADS/PUBLICATIONS 7,140 7,583 7,500 5,000 66.7% 7,500 100.150.531.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 437 - 1,000 1,000 100.0% 1,000 Total Supplies 7,835 8,727 9,000 6,500 72.2% 9,000
100.150.531.06 SERVICES
100.150.531.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 401,136 574,712 525,000 500,000 95.2% 450,000 100.150.531.06.631 FEES-PLANNING COMMISSIONERS 2,800 3,900 6,000 5,500 91.7% 6,000 Total Services 403,936 578,612 531,000 505,500 95.2% 456,000 Department Total 416,600 596,565 550,750 516,000 93.7% 476,250 Community Development - Planning Division
47 15.a
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 150 Comm Development Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 541 Economic Development 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.150.541.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
100.150.541.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES - - 2,800 - 0.0% 2,200 100.150.541.03.305 DUES/SUBS/MEMBERSHIPS 2,000 4,300 5,150 - 0.0% 550 Total Employee Development 2,000 4,300 7,950 - 0.0% 2,750 100.150.541.04 COMMUNICATIONS
100.150.541.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 493 493 500 600 120.0% 600 Total Communications 493 493 500 600 120.0% 600
100.150.541.05 SUPPLIES
100.150.541.05.520 ADS/PUBLICATIONS 16,323 10,000 12,000 - 0.0% 1,000 Total Supplies 16,323 10,000 12,000 - 0.0% 1,000
100.150.541.06 SERVICES
100.150.541.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 197,706 124,291 200,000 - 0.0% 120,000 Total Services 197,706 124,291 200,000 - 0.0% 120,000
100.150.541.07 TAXES/INSURANCE/MISCELLANEOUS
100.150.541.07.746 MARKETING 3,950 2,888 7,200 - 0.0% - Total Taxes/Insurance/Misc 3,950 2,888 7,200 - 0.0% -
Department Total 220,473 141,972 227,650 600 0.3% 124,350 Economic Development Division
48 15.a
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 150 Comm Development Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 542 Community Promotion 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.150.542.07 TAXES/INSURANCE/MISCELLANEOUS
100.150.542.07.755 PLANNED COMMUNITY PROMOTION 125,000 - - - #DIV/0! - 100.150.542.07.765 DOWNTOWN CHRISTMAS LIGHTING - - 1,450 - 0% - Total Taxes/Insurance/Misc 125,000 - 1,450 - 0.0% -
Department Total 125,000 - 1,450 - 0.0% -
Community Promotion Division
49 15.a
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 150 Comm Development Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 543 Harvey House Division 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.150.543.01 SALARIES
100.150.543.01.108 SALARIES CASUAL 79,684 70,449 72,000 72,000 100.0% 72,000 Total Salaries 79,684 70,449 72,000 72,000 100.0% 72,000 100.150.543.04 COMMUNICATIONS
100.150.543.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 7,779 8,247 8,050 8,575 106.5% 8,575 Total Communications 7,779 8,247 8,050 8,575 106.5% 8,575 100.150.543.05 SUPPLIES
100.150.543.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 932 3,623 - - 0.0% 7,000 Total Supplies 932 3,623 - - 0.0% 7,000
100.150.543.06 SERVICES
100.150.543.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 4,190 13,043 1,500 - 0.0% 2,500 Total Services 4,190 13,043 1,500 - 0.0% 2,500
100.150.543.14 ELECTRICITY
100.150.543.14.402 ELECTRICITY/OUTSIDE 29,386 32,733 - - 0.0% - 100.150.543.14.430 ELECTRICITY/INSIDE 31,278 34,676 - - 0.0% - Total Electricity 60,665 67,409 - - 0.0% -
100.150.543.24 NATURAL GAS
100.150.543.24.445 NATURAL GAS 5,653 1,771 - - 0.0% -
Total Natural Gas 5,653 1,771 - - 0.0% -
100.150.543.34 WATER
100.150.543.34.480 WATER 9,176 12,104 - - 0.0% -
Total Water 9,176 12,104 - - 0.0% -
Department Total 168,080 176,646 81,550 80,575 98.8% 90,075 Community Development - Harvey House Division
50 15.a
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 160 Recreation Dept Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 630 Parks and Recreation 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.160.630.01 SALARIES
100.160.630.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 227,176 108,933 177,500 177,500 100.0% 215,100 100.160.630.01.103 OVERTIME 7,160 7,583 5,000 5,000 100.0% 5,125 100.160.630.01.108 SALARIES CASUAL 138,084 146,938 125,000 125,000 100.0% 125,000 100.160.630.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 31,250 19,156 25,500 25,500 100.0% 33,000 Total Salaries 403,670 282,610 333,000 333,000 100.0% 378,225 100.160.630.02 BENEFITS
100.160.630.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 32,255 14,979 14,000 14,000 100.0% 16,800 100.160.630.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 771 369 700 700 100.0% 800 100.160.630.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 10,486 11,511 18,369 18,369 100.0% 18,952 100.160.630.02.206 BENEFITS - DEFERRED COMP 841 461 800 800 100.0% 900 100.160.630.02.207 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE - - - - #DIV/0! -
100.160.630.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 11,052 9,386 4,000 4,000 100.0% 4,600 100.160.630.02.211 BENEFITS-PARS 3,134 3,778 4,500 4,500 100.0% 4,500 100.160.630.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 2,490 1,624 2,100 2,100 100.0% 2,700 100.160.630.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 12,732 20,827 - - #DIV/0! - Total Benefits 73,762 62,935 44,469 44,469 100.0% 49,252 100.160.630.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
100.160.630.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES 1,938 619 4,820 4,820 100.0% 4,820 100.160.630.03.305 DUES/SUBS/MEMBERSHIPS - 170 - - #DIV/0! - Total Employee Development 1,938 789 4,820 4,820 100.0% 4,820 100.160.630.04 COMMUNICATIONS
100.160.630.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 6,018 5,985 5,925 6,350 107.2% 6,350 Total Communications 6,018 5,985 5,925 6,350 107.2% 6,350 100.160.630.05 SUPPLIES
100.160.630.05.501 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,121 1,724 850 - 0.0% - 100.160.630.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 23,184 18,887 250 - 0.0% - Total Supplies 24,305 20,612 1,100 - 0.0% -
100.160.630.06 SERVICES
100.160.630.06.612 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 9,207 28,292 - - #DIV/0! - 100.160.630.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 34,506 15,755 - - #DIV/0! - 100.160.630.06.631 INSTRUCTORS / REFEREES 21,494 14,272 28,000 - 0.0% - 100.160.630.06.644 IT COST ALLOCATION 6,759 8,891 8,100 3,500 43.2% 10,700 100.160.630.06.645 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 466 - 1,000 - 0.0% - Total Services 72,432 67,209 37,100 3,500 9.4% 10,700
100.160.630.07 TAXES/INSURANCE/MISCELLANEOUS
100.160.630.07.705 LOSSES/CLAIMS 14 45 112 - 0.0% -
100.160.630.07.743 CUSTOMER REFUNDS 1,165 25,885 4,800 - 0.0% - Total Taxes/Insurance/Misc 1,179 25,930 4,912 - 0.0% -
100.160.630.14 ELECTRICITY
100.160.630.14.418 ELECTRICITY-TENNIS COURTS 255 286 300 302 100.7% 300 100.160.630.14.419 ELECTRICITY-FOGLESONG PARK 38,389 41,365 47,450 47,540 100.2% 47,450 100.160.630.14.420 ELECTRICITY-LILLIAN PARK 1,738 2,378 2,000 2,020 101.0% 2,100 100.160.630.14.421 ELECTRICITY-STURNACLE PARK 736 784 750 690 92.0% 750 100.160.630.14.422 ELECTRICITY-JASPER PARK 560 1,201 1,600 1,690 105.6% 1,600 100.160.630.14.424 ELECTRICITY-PANAMINT PARK 2,061 2,209 2,500 1,710 68.4% 2,500 100.160.630.14.425 ELECTRICITY-SOCCER FIELDS 251 219 400 225 56.3% 400 100.160.630.14.426 ELECTRICITY-BARSTOW HEIGHTS 52 (6) 200 110 55.0% 200 100.160.630.14.427 ELECTRICITY-72 OPAL RIMROCK 10,749 10,790 15,000 13,250 88.3% 15,000 100.160.630.14.430 ELECTRICITY-DANA PARK 614 664 700 615 87.9% 700 100.160.630.14.431 ELECTRICITY-COMM CENTER 48,017 32,977 35,000 21,800 62.3% 35,000 Total Electricity 103,424 92,866 105,900 89,952 84.9% 106,000 100.160.630.24 NATURAL GAS
100.160.630.24.440 NATURAL GAS-JASPER PARK 443 429 2,500 2,075 83.0% 2,500 100.160.630.24.441 NATURAL GAS-DANA PARK 4,955 2,337 3,000 121 4.0% 2,250 100.160.630.24.442 NATURAL GAS-841 BARSTOW RD 4,149 4,252 4,000 3,810 95.3% 4,000 Total Natural Gas 9,547 7,018 9,500 6,006 63.2% 8,750
Parks and Recreation Division
51 15.a
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 160 Recreation Dept Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 630 Parks and Recreation 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.160.630.34 WATER
100.160.630.34.466 WATER-FOGLESONG PARK 94,167 168,127 139,000 139,000 100.0% 139,000 100.160.630.34.467 WATER-LILLIAN PARK 44,048 43,269 59,000 57,000 96.6% 59,000 100.160.630.34.468 WATER-STURNACLE PARK 30,972 38,154 44,000 44,000 100.0% 44,000 100.160.630.34.469 WATER-JASPER PARK 24,337 35,531 42,800 38,500 90.0% 42,800 100.160.630.34.471 WATER-PANAMINT PARK 15,893 25,732 32,000 29,300 91.6% 32,000 100.160.630.34.472 WATER-SOCCER FIELDS 59,216 77,129 82,250 82,250 100.0% 82,250 100.160.630.34.473 WATER-BARSTOW HEIGHTS 17,294 21,935 30,200 29,150 96.5% 30,200 100.160.630.34.474 WATER-STRINGHAM PARK 74,024 102,839 109,000 103,000 94.5% 109,000 100.160.630.34.477 WATER-DANA PARK 41,505 24,858 108,000 114,900 106.4% 110,000 Total Water 401,456 537,573 646,250 637,100 98.6% 648,250 Department Total 1,097,731 1,103,528 1,192,976 1,125,197 94.3% 1,212,347 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Parks & Rec Superintendent 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Recreation Activity Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Recreation Program Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total FTE's: 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00
Parks and Recreation Division
52 15.a
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 160 Recreation Dept Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 636 Henderson Pool 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.160.636.01 SALARIES
100.160.636.01.103 OVERTIME 369 - - - 0.0% -
100.160.636.01.108 SALARIES CASUAL 62,445 54,292 65,000 65,000 100.0% 65,000 Total Salaries 62,814 54,292 65,000 65,000 100.0% 65,000 100.160.636.04 COMMUNICATIONS
100.160.636.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 862 918 1,000 925 92.5% 1,000 Total Communications 862 918 1,000 925 92.5% 1,000
100.160.636.05 SUPPLIES
100.160.636.05.524 HENDERSON SNACK BAR 3,354 1,995 5,000 5,000 100.0% 5,000 100.160.636.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 19,512 2,454 1,000 - 0.0% - 100.160.636.05.526 CHEMICAL SUPPLIES - 15,460 17,000 - 0.0% - Total Supplies 22,865 19,909 23,000 5,000 21.7% 5,000
100.160.636.06 SERVICES
100.160.636.06.612 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 22,856 11,100 - - 0.0% - 100.160.636.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 5,886 13,122 - - 0.0% - 100.160.636.06.645 SAFETY EQUIPMENT - 1,106 1,000 - 0.0% - Total Services 28,742 25,327 1,000 - 0.0% -
Department Total 115,282 100,446 90,000 70,925 78.8% 71,000 Henderson Pool Division
53 15.a
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 100 General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 160 Recreation Dept Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 640 Sports Park Division 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.160.640.01 SALARIES
100.160.640.01.108 SALARIES CASUAL 91,053 93,611 - - 0.0% - Total Salaries 91,053 93,611 - - 0.0% -
100.160.640.04 COMMUNICATIONS
100.160.640.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 2,388 2,475 - - 0.0% - Total Communications 2,388 2,475 - - 0.0% -
100.160.640.05 SUPPLIES
100.160.640.05.501 OFFICE SUPPLIES 24 472 - - 0.0% -
100.160.640.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 10,888 20,388 250 - 0.0% - 100.160.640.05.526 PROGRAM SUPPLIES/CONCESSIONS 22,096 9,209 - - 0.0% - Total Supplies 33,008 30,069 250 - 0.0% -
100.160.640.06 SERVICES
100.160.640.06.612 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 5,146 17,224 250 - 0.0% - 100.160.640.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 4,755 3,542 - - 0.0% - 100.160.640.06.644 IT COST ALLOCATION 12,953 12,821 - - 0.0% - 100.160.640.06.645 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 275 454 - - 0.0% -
Total Services 23,129 34,041 250 - 0.0% -
100.160.640.14 ELECTRICITY
100.160.640.14.401 ELECTRICITY-MAYOR KATY PKWY 26,361 26,548 - - 0.0% - Total Electricity 26,361 26,548 - - 0.0% -
100.160.640.24 NATURAL GAS
100.160.640.24.401 NATURAL GAS-GUADALUPE #2 132 132 - - 0.0% - 100.160.640.24.402 NATURAL GAS-GUADALUPE #1 298 210 - - 0.0% - Total Natural Gas 430 342 - - 0.0% -
100.160.640.34 WATER
100.160.640.34.401 WATER-TRACK 2700 MAYOR KATY 321 379 - - 0.0% - 100.160.640.34.402 WATER-2800 GUADALUPE-A 52,567 56,922 - - 0.0% - 100.160.640.34.403 WATER-2800 GUADALUPE-B 44,169 60,786 - - 0.0% - 100.160.640.34.404 WATER-2800 GUADALUPE-C 2,688 3,206 - - 0.0% - 100.160.640.34.405 WATER-2800 GUADALUPE-D 23,654 55,530 - - 0.0% - Total Water 123,398 176,823 - - 0.0% -
Department Total 299,767 363,908 500 - 0.0% -
Sportspark Division
54 15.a
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 102 Measure Q - General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 110 General Government Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 115 Transfers and Others 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 102.110.115.02 BENEFITS
102.110.115.02.227 PENSION UNFUNDED LIABILITY 12,450 - 11,398 11,398 100.0% 2,027 Total Benefits 12,450 - 11,398 11,398 100.0% 2,027
102.110.115.09 TRANSFERS/CONTINGENCY/CONTRAS
102.110.115.09.100 COST ALLOCATION - GENERAL FUND I 508,000 508,000 508,000 508,000 100.0% 508,000 102.110.115.09.302 TRANSFERS TO DEBT SERVICE 19,060 19,107 19,082 19,082 100.0% 19,105 Total Transfers/Contingency/Contras 527,060 527,107 527,082 527,082 100.0% 527,105 Department Total 539,509 527,107 538,480 538,480 100.0% 529,132 Measure Q - Transfers and Others
55 15.a
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 102 Measure Q - General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 110 General Government Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 120 City Manager 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 102.110.120.06 SERVICES
102.110.120.06.628 AUDIT EXPENSE 3,680 1,900 1,960 1,960 100.0% 2,000 102.110.120.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 6,108 2,714 11,000 - 0.0% - Total Services 9,788 4,614 12,960 1,960 15.1% 2,000
Department Total 9,788 4,614 12,960 1,960 15.1% 2,000
Measure Q - City Manager
56 15.a
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 102 Measure Q - General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 110 General Government Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 160 Information Technology 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 102.110.160.01 SALARIES
102.110.160.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 40,727 45,296 45,700 45,700 100.0% 45,200 102.110.160.01.103 OVERTIME 3,196 5,664 5,000 5,000 100.0% 6,000 102.110.160.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 4,600 4,800 4,800 4,800 100.0% 4,800 102.110.160.01.111 STANDBY BASIC 2,312 2,109 2,500 2,500 100.0% 2,500 Total Salaries 50,835 57,869 58,000 58,000 100.0% 58,500 102.110.160.02 BENEFITS
102.110.160.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 3,035 3,390 3,600 3,600 100.0% 3,700 102.110.160.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 132 135 200 200 100.0% 200 102.110.160.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP - 1,621 2,588 2,588 100.0% 2,670 102.110.160.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 606 680 700 700 100.0% 700 102.110.160.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 417 465 600 600 100.0% 600 102.110.160.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT - 1,017 - - 0.0% - Total Benefits 4,189 7,308 7,688 7,688 100.0% 7,870
Department Total 55,024 65,177 65,688 65,688 100.0% 66,370 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Information Technology Coordinator 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
Total FTE's: 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
Measure Q - Information Technology Division
57 15.a
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 102 Measure Q - General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 110 General Government Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 175 Insurance/Risk Mgmt 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 102.110.175.07 TAXES/INSURANCE/MISC.
102.110.175.07.724 INSURANCE, LIABILITY 113,215 148,268 225,220 - 0.0% 353,734 Total Taxes/Insurance/Misc. 113,215 148,268 225,220 - 0.0% 353,734 Department Total 113,215 148,268 225,220 - 0.0% 353,734 Measure Q - Insurance/Risk Management Division
58 15.a
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 102 Measure Q - General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 130 Police Department Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 321 Police Uniform Division 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 102.130.321.01 SALARIES
102.130.321.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 698,797 743,902 786,700 786,700 100.0% 845,900 102.130.321.01.103 OVERTIME 650,171 769,023 700,000 800,000 114.3% 250,000 102.130.321.01.107 OVERTIME-COURT 19,187 24,301 20,000 20,000 100.0% 21,000 102.130.321.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 86,625 83,000 87,000 87,000 100.0% 90,000 102.130.321.01.110 OVERTIME-SPECIAL EVENT 555 - - - 0.0% - 102.130.321.01.111 STANDBY BASIC 10,583 2,546 19,300 19,300 100.0% 19,783 102.130.321.01.120 OVERTIME - CHP CANNABIS GRANT - - - - 0.0% - Total Salaries 1,465,918 1,622,772 1,613,000 1,713,000 106.2% 1,226,683 102.130.321.02 BENEFITS
102.130.321.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 83,726 96,342 106,800 106,800 100.0% 115,400 102.130.321.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 2,298 2,212 2,500 2,500 100.0% 2,500 102.130.321.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 21,336 25,755 41,103 41,103 100.0% 42,406 102.130.321.02.207 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 8,900 9,400 10,100 10,100 100.0% 10,100 102.130.321.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 30,419 26,882 24,000 24,000 100.0% 25,500 102.130.321.02.210 BENEFITS - WORKERS COMP CLAIMS 139,222 (11,288) 25,000 - 0.0% - 102.130.321.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 10,598 9,666 9,100 9,100 100.0% 10,600 102.130.321.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 5,059 9,072 10,000 - 0.0% - 102.130.321.02.227 PENSION UNFUNDED LIABILITY 1,935 2,421 4,102 4,102 100.0% 6,213 Total Benefits 303,492 170,463 232,705 197,705 85.0% 212,719 102.130.321.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
102.130.321.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES 19,018 18,544 52,418 - 0.0% 21,578 102.130.321.03.305 DUES/SUBS/MEMBERSHIPS - - 3,000 - 0.0% 3,000 Total Employee Development 19,018 18,544 55,418 - 0.0% 24,578 102.130.321.05 SUPPLIES
102.130.321.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES - - 4,100 - 0.0% 40,000 102.130.321.05.526 AMMUNITION & RANGE SUPPLIES 9,906 19,782 30,000 - 0.0% - Total Employee Development 9,906 19,782 34,100 - 0.0% 40,000 102.130.321.06 SERVICES
102.130.321.06.601 VEHICLE FUEL COST 65,063 70,034 75,000 - 0.0% - 102.130.321.06.608 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE COST MEAS Q PD 84,826 43,472 58,000 - 0.0% - 102.130.321.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 113,632 142,035 241,200 - 0.0% 70,000 102.130.321.06.632 PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT - PD 4,615 5,570 10,000 - 0.0% - 102.130.321.06.644 IT COST ALLOCATION 55,377 138,582 269,000 210,000 78.1% 250,000 102.130.321.06.645 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 13,272 13,655 28,800 - 0.0% - 102.130.321.06.647 CROSSING GUARD CONTRACT - - 5,000 - 0.0% - Total Services 336,785 413,349 687,000 210,000 30.6% 320,000 102.130.321.07 TAXES/INSURANCE/MISC.
102.130.321.07.733 CAP-LEASE-ENTERPRISE PROG MEAS Q 93,397 189,863 153,000 175,000 114.4% 145,300 102.130.321.07.749 CAP-LEASE LICENSE PLATE READERS 19,950 65,050 85,000 - 0.0% - 102.130.321.07.762 EXPLORER PROGRAM - - 2,260 - 0.0% -
Total Taxes/Insurance/Misc. 113,347 254,913 240,260 175,000 72.8% 145,300 102.130.321.08 CAPITAL EQUP/PROJECTS
102.130.321.08.801 BODY WORN CAMERAS - - 47,800 - 0.0% - 102.130.321.08.882 MACHINERY & EQUIP $20K AND UP - PD 97,256 40,129 40,200 - 0.0% - Total Capital Equip/Projects 97,256 40,129 88,000 - 0.0% - 102.130.321.09 TRANSFERS/CONTINGENCY/CONTRAS
102.130.321.09.302 TRANSFERS TO DEBT SERVICE 6,750 6,767 6,758 6,758 100.0% 6,767 Total Transfers/Contingency/Contras 6,750 6,767 6,758 6,758 0.0% 6,767 Department Total 2,352,471 2,546,718 2,957,241 2,302,463 77.9% 1,976,047 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Police Officer 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00
Total FTE's: 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00
Measure Q - Police Uniform Division
59 15.a
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 102 Measure Q - General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 130 Police Department Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 323 Police Dispatch Division 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 102.130.323.01 SALARIES
102.130.323.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 217,948 186,573 221,800 221,800 100.0% 224,900 102.130.323.01.103 OVERTIME 131,583 210,983 190,000 190,000 100.0% - 102.130.323.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 28,750 22,000 30,000 30,000 100.0% 30,000 Total Salaries 378,281 419,556 441,800 441,800 100.0% 254,900 102.130.323.02 BENEFITS
102.130.323.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 20,668 13,583 17,200 17,200 100.0% 17,500 102.130.323.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 781 611 800 800 100.0% 800 102.130.323.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 7,044 8,283 13,220 13,220 100.0% 13,639 102.130.323.02.207 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 2,268 1,512 2,300 2,300 100.0% 2,300 102.130.323.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 4,557 3,777 3,400 3,400 100.0% 3,500 102.130.323.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 3,121 2,625 2,600 2,600 100.0% 2,900 102.130.323.02.215 SICK LEAVE PAY OUT 366 - - - 0.0% -
102.130.323.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 2,076 - - - 0.0% - Total Benefits 40,883 30,392 39,520 39,520 100.0% 40,639 102.130.323.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
102.130.323.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES - 1,376 1,790 - 0.0% 5,500 Total Employment Development - 1,376 1,790 - 0.0% 5,500 102.130.323.08 CAPITAL EQUIP/PROJECTS
102.130.323.08.801 DISPATCH CENTER UPGRADE - 104,829 2,600 - 0.0% - 102.130.323.08.802 DISPATCH 911 PHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE - - 200,000 - 0.0% - Total Capital Equip/Projects - 104,829 202,600 - 0.0% - Department Total 419,163 556,153 685,710 481,320 70.2% 301,039 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Dispatcher 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Total FTE's: 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Measure Q - Police Dispatch Division
60 15.a
Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 102 Measure Q - General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 130 Police Department Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 324 Police Admin Division 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 102.130.324.01 SALARIES
102.130.324.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 40,019 61,143 83,720 83,720 100.0% 68,600 102.130.324.01.103 OVERTIME 563 963 500 500 100.0% 1,000 102.130.324.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 8,625 9,000 9,000 9,000 100.0% 9,000 Total Salaries 49,207 71,106 93,220 93,220 100.0% 78,600 102.130.324.02 BENEFITS
102.130.324.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 3,031 4,790 4,800 4,800 100.0% 5,400 102.130.324.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 247 235 300 300 100.0% 300 102.130.324.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 1,805 2,226 3,553 3,553 100.0% 3,666 102.130.324.02.207 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 756 756 800 800 100.0% 800 102.130.324.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 731 1,066 1,000 1,000 100.0% 1,100 102.130.324.02.213 BILINGUAL SERVICES 660 720 800 800 100.0% 800 102.130.324.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 487 733 800 800 100.0% 900 Total Benefits 7,716 10,527 12,053 12,053 100.0% 12,966 Department Total 56,923 81,632 105,273 105,273 100.0% 91,566 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Police Services Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total FTE's: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Measure Q - Police Administration Division
61 15.a
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 102 Measure Q - General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 140 Comm Services Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 425 Street Maintenance 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 102.140.425.01 SALARIES
102.140.425.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 99,810 97,075 116,600 116,600 100.0% 118,800 102.140.425.01.103 OVERTIME 7,456 3,467 5,000 5,000 100.0% 5,125 102.140.425.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 21,625 21,500 24,000 24,000 100.0% 24,000 102.140.425.01.110 OT CASUAL EVENT 658 541 - - 0.0% -
102.140.425.01.111 STANDBY BASIC 3,744 2,943 3,000 3,000 100.0% 3,000 Total Salaries 133,294 125,526 148,600 148,600 100.0% 150,925 102.140.425.02 BENEFITS
102.140.425.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 7,419 7,452 9,200 9,200 100.0% 9,500 102.140.425.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 498 390 500 500 100.0% 500 102.140.425.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 3,431 4,031 6,433 6,433 100.0% 6,637 102.140.425.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 1,779 1,655 1,900 1,900 100.0% 1,900 102.140.425.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 1,232 1,098 1,400 1,400 100.0% 1,600 102.140.425.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 4,570 5,337 - - 0.0% - Total Benefits 18,928 19,962 19,433 19,433 100.0% 20,137 102.140.425.05 SUPPLIES
102.140.425.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 74,054 139,369 157,300 - 0.0% 72,000 Total Supplies 74,054 139,369 157,300 - 0.0% 72,000
102.140.425.06 SERVICES
102.140.425.06.644 IT COST ALLOCATION 11,872 11,301 12,500 10,000 80.0% 12,500 Total Services 11,872 11,301 12,500 10,000 80.0% 12,500 102.140.425.08 CAPITAL EQUIP/PROJECTS
102.140.425.08.806 MASTIC MACHINE 75,367 - - - 0.0% -
102.140.425.08.807 DUMP TRUCK - - 99,990 - 0.0% -
102.140.425.08.808 WHEEL LOADER - - 352,322 - 0.0% -
Total Capital Equip/Projects 75,367 - 452,312 - 0.0% -
Department Total 313,515 296,158 790,145 178,033 22.5% 255,562 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Public Services Asst. I 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Total FTE's: 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Measure Q - Street Maintenance Division
62 15.a
Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 102 Measure Q - General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 140 Comm Services Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 430 Open Spaces 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 102.140.430.05 SUPPLIES
102.140.430.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 44,908 42,241 94,000 - 0.0% - Total Supplies 44,908 42,241 94,000 - 0.0% -
102.140.430.06 SERVICES
102.140.430.06.612 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE - 15,816 40,500 - 0.0% - 102.140.430.06.630 FEES/SERVICES - - 18,400 - 0.0% -
Total Services - 15,816 58,900 - 0.0% -
102.140.430.08 CAPITAL EQUIP/PROJECTS
102.140.430.08.801 JOHN DEERE 210L DIESEL MOWER 49,093 - - - 0.0% - 102.140.430.08.804 PARK IMPROVEMENTS 482,196 524,382 850,000 - 0.0% 100,000 Total Capital Equip/Projects 531,288 524,382 850,000 - 0.0% 100,000 100.140.430.14 ELECTRICITY
102.140.430.14.421 ELECTRICITY-HIGHLAND TRAILS - - 150 150 100.0% 150 102.140.430.14.424 ELECTRICITY-2ND ST PARK - - 1,500 1,800 120.0% 1,800 102.140.430.14.425 ELECTRICITY - RIMROCK MEDIAN - - 100 35 35.0% 100 102.140.430.14.426 ELECTRICITY-MONTEREY RD AREA - - 100 35 35.0% 100 102.140.430.14.474 ELECTRICITY-2218 MURIEL DR-IRRIGATION - - 100 100 100.0% 100 Total Electricity - - 1,950 2,120 0.0% 2,250
100.140.430.34 WATER
102.140.430.34.467 WATER-CITY PROJ AREAS - - 29,100 29,100 100.0% 29,100 102.140.430.34.469 WATER-LENWOOD RD X SERRANO - - 6,000 7,375 122.9% 7,375 102.140.430.34.470 WATER-VISTA - - 4,000 4,100 102.5% 4,100 102.140.430.34.473 WATER-MONTEREY RD AREA - - 3,000 4,100 136.7% 4,100 102.140.430.34.474 MURIEL @ BROADWAY IRRIGATION - - 4,000 4,375 109.4% 4,375 102.140.430.34.475 LENWOOD & MAIN IRRIGATION - - 3,000 4,200 140.0% 4,200 Total Water - - 49,100 53,250 0.0% 53,250
Department Total 576,196 582,439 1,053,950 55,370 0.0% 155,500 Measure Q - Open Spaces Maintenance Division
63 15.a
Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 102 Measure Q - General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 140 Comm Services Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 435 Building Maintenance 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 102.140.435.08 CAPITAL EQUIP/PROJECTS
102.140.435.08.801 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS - 15,438 68,452 - 0.0% 30,000 Total Capital Equip/Projects - 15,438 68,452 - 0.0% 30,000 Department Total - 15,438 68,452 - 0.0% 30,000
Measure Q - Building Maintenance Division
64 15.a
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 102 Measure Q - General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 140 Comm Services Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 440 Fleet Maintenance 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 102.140.440.01 SALARIES
102.140.440.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 75,385 83,937 88,200 88,200 100.0% 95,300 102.140.440.01.103 OVERTIME 962 285 500 500 100.0% 550
102.140.440.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 11,500 12,000 12,000 12,000 100.0% 12,000 102.140.440.01.110 OVERTIME-SPECIAL EVENT 430 479 - - 0.0% - Total Salaries 88,278 96,701 100,700 100,700 100.0% 107,850 102.140.440.02 BENEFITS
102.140.440.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 5,548 6,390 6,800 6,800 100.0% 7,600 102.140.440.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 274 267 300 300 100.0% 300 102.140.440.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 2,314 2,925 4,667 4,667 100.0% 4,815 102.140.440.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 994 1,061 1,400 1,400 100.0% 1,500 102.140.440.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 687 730 1,000 1,000 100.0% 1,200 102.140.440.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT (1,883) - - - 0.0% - Total Benefits 7,934 11,373 14,167 14,167 100.0% 15,415 102.140.440.06 SERVICES
102.140.440.06.601 VEHICLE FUEL COST 6,143 8,054 10,500 - 0.0% - 102.140.440.06.608 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE COST 4,999 12,897 13,500 - 0.0% - Total Services 11,142 20,950 24,000 - 0.0% -
Department Total 107,354 129,024 138,867 114,867 82.7% 123,265 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Senior Mechanic 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total FTE's: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Measure Q - Fleet Maintenance Division
65 15.a
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 102 Measure Q - General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 150 Comm Development Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 542 Community Promotion 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 100.150.543.07 TAXES/INSURANCE/MISCELLANEOUS
102.150.542.07.755 PLANNED COMMUNITY PROMOTIONS 24,320 13,161 85,000 - 0.0% 80,000 102.150.542.07.765 DOWNTOWN XMAS LIGHTS 4,674 5,518 5,500 - 0.0% 8,000 102.150.542.07.766 MURAL PROGRAM 35,000 35,000 40,000 - 0.0% 40,000 102.150.542.07.767 4TH OF JULY COMM EVENT 58,338 60,556 75,000 - 0.0% 70,000 102.150.542.07.768 MILITARY BANNERS 131 261 22,000 - 0.0% 5,000 102.150.542.07.769 COMM PROMOTION GENERAL (UNPL) 227 - 5,000 - 0.0% - 102.150.542.07.770 YOUTH PROGRAM FUNDS MEAS Q 76,698 33,645 150,000 - 0.0% 150,000 102.150.542.07.771 SENIOR PROGRAM FUNDS MEAS Q 10,046 280 50,000 - 0.0% 50,000 Total Taxes/Insurance/Misc 209,434 148,421 432,500 - 0.0% 403,000 Department Total 209,434 148,421 432,500 - 0.0% 403,000 Community Development - Community Promotion Division
66 15.a
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 102 Measure Q - General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 150 Comm Development Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 543 Harvey House 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 102.140.430.05 SUPPLIES
102.150.543.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES - - 13,000 - 0.0% 19,000 Total Supplies - - 13,000 - 0.0% 19,000
102.140.430.06 SERVICES
102.150.543.06.630 FEES/SERVICES - - 30,000 - 0.0% 60,000 Total Fees/Services - - 30,000 - 0.0% 60,000
100.140.430.14 ELECTRICITY
102.150.543.14.402 ELECTRICITY/OUTSIDE - - 30,000 31,100 103.7% 31,100 102.150.543.14.430 ELECTRICITY/INSIDE - - 30,000 31,000 103.3% 31,000 Total Electricity - - 60,000 62,100 103.5% 62,100
100.140.430.24 NATURAL GAS
102.150.543.24.445 NATURAL GAS - - 4,000 4,675 116.9% 4,675 Total Natural Gas - - 4,000 4,675 0.0% 4,675
100.140.430.34 WATER
102.150.543.34.480 WATER - - 15,000 14,275 95.2% 15,000 Total Water - - 15,000 14,275 0.0% 15,000
Department Total - - 122,000 81,050 0.0% 160,775
Community Development - Harvey House Division
67 15.a
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 102 Measure Q - General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 160 Recreation Department Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 630 Parks and Recreation 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 102.160.630.05 SUPPLIES
102.160.630.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES - - 15,000 - 0.0% 17,500 Total Supplies - - 15,000 - 0.0% 17,500
102.160.630.06 SERVICES
102.160.630.06.612 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE - - 15,000 - 0.0% - 102.160.630.06.630 FEES/SERVICES - - 18,000 - 0.0% 8,700 102.160.630.06.644 IT COST ALLOCATION 1,500 - - - 0.0% - Total Services 1,500 - 33,000 - 0.0% 8,700
102.160.630.08 CAPITAL PROJECTS
102.160.630.08.801 PARK IMPROVEMENTS 58,009 95,347 - - 0.0% - Total Capital Projects 58,009 95,347 - - 0.0% -
Department Total 59,509 95,347 48,000 - 0.0% 26,200
Measure Q - Parks and Recreation Division
68 15.a
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 102 Measure Q - General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 160 Recreation Dept Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 636 Henderson Pool 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 102.160.636.05 SUPPLIES
102.160.636.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES - - 1,200 - 0.0% 3,000 Total SUPPLIES - - 1,200 - 0.0% 3,000
102.160.636.06 SERVICES
102.160.636.06.612 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE - - 18,000 - 0.0% - 102.160.636.06.630 FEES/SERVICES - - 11,000 - 0.0% 5,150 102.160.636.06.644 IT COST ALLOCATION 9,467 9,011 12,500 8,500 68.0% 12,500 Total Services 9,467 9,011 41,500 8,500 20.5% 17,650
Department Total 9,467 9,011 42,700 8,500 19.9% 20,650
Measure Q - Henderson Pool Division
69 15.a
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 102 Measure Q - General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 160 Recreation Dept Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 640 Sports Park Division 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 102.160.640.01 SALARIES
102.160.640.01.108 SALARIES CASUAL - - 90,000 90,000 100.0% 90,000 Total Salaries - - 90,000 90,000 100.0% 90,000
102.160.640.04 COMMUNICATIONS
102.160.640.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS - - 2,425 3,125 128.9% 3,125 Total Communications - - 2,425 3,125 128.9% 3,125
102.160.640.05 SUPPLIES
102.160.640.05.501 OFFICE SUPPLIES - - 500 - 0.0% -
102.160.640.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES - - 22,500 - 0.0% 22,500 102.160.640.05.526 PROGRAM SUPPLIES/CONCESSIONS - - 10,000 - 0.0% - Total Supplies - - 33,000 - 0.0% 22,500
102.160.640.06 SERVICES
102.160.640.06.612 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE - - 20,000 - 0.0% - 102.160.640.06.620 RENTALS/LEASES - - 500 - 0.0% -
102.160.640.06.630 FEES/SERVICES - - 4,850 - 0.0% 5,500 102.160.640.06.644 IT COST ALLOCATION - 1,000 14,000 11,000 78.6% 15,000 102.160.640.06.645 SAFETY EQUIPMENT - - 2,000 - 0.0% -
Total Services - 1,000 41,350 11,000 26.6% 20,500
102.160.640.14 ELECTRICITY
102.160.640.14.401 ELECTRICITY-MAYOR KATY PKWY - - 23,000 23,350 101.5% 23,000 Total Electricity - - 23,000 23,350 101.5% 23,000
102.160.640.24 NATURAL GAS
102.160.640.24.401 NATURAL GAS-GUADALUPE #2 - - 200 125 62.5% 200 102.160.640.24.402 NATURAL GAS-GUADALUPE #2 - - 500 150 30.0% 500 Total Natural Gas - - 700 275 39.3% 700
100.160.640.34 WATER
102.160.640.34.401 WATER-TRACK 2700 MAYOR KATY - - 400 515 128.8% 515 102.160.640.34.402 WATER-2800 GUADALUPE-A - - 78,200 71,300 91.2% 78,200 102.160.640.34.403 WATER-2800 GUADALUPE-B - - 80,000 72,750 90.9% 80,000 102.160.640.34.404 WATER-2800 GUADALUPE-C - - 5,500 5,250 95.5% 5,500 102.160.640.34.405 WATER-2800 GUADALUPE-D - - 64,750 67,250 103.9% 67,250 Total Water - - 228,850 217,065 94.9% 231,465
Department Total - 1,000 419,325 344,815 82.2% 391,290
Measure Q - Sportspark Division
70 15.a
Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 102 Measure Q - General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 225 Barstow Fire Protection Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 225 Barstow Fire Protection 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 102.225.225.07 TAXES/INSURANCE/MISC
102.225.225.07.700 HOLMAN CAPITAL EQUIP LEASE PURCHASE 167,203 167,203 167,203 167,203 100.0% 467,203 Total Taxes/Insurance/Misc 167,203 167,203 167,203 167,203 100.0% 467,203 102.225.225.09 TRANSFERS/CONTINGENCY/CONTRACTS
102.225.225.08.807 PIERCE ENFORCER PUC PUMPER & BRUSH TR - - 1,594,890 - 0.0% - 102.225.225.08.808 SCBA BOTTLES/PACKS - 16,865 177,426 - 0.0% - 102.225.225.08.809 SCBA COMPRESSOR - - 91,824 - 0.0% -
Total Taxes/Insurance/Misc - 16,865 1,864,140 - 0.0% -
102.225.225.09 TRANSFERS/CONTINGENCY/CONTRACTS
102.225.225.09.103 TRANSFER TO MEAS Q 103 4,632,178 4,165,657 4,022,830 - 0.0% 4,863,965 Total Capital Equip/Projects 4,632,178 4,165,657 4,022,830 - 0.0% 4,863,965 Department Total 4,799,381 4,349,724 6,054,173 167,203 2.8% 5,331,168 Measure Q 102 - Barstow Fire Protection District
71 15.a
Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 102 Measure Q - General Fund Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 225 Barstow Fire Protection Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 229 Barstow Fire Protection - Admin 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 102.225.225.09 TRANSFERS/CONTINGENCY/CONTRACTS
102.225.229.09.103 TRANSFER TO MEAS Q 103 103,844 109,915 114,695 - 0% 98,620 Total Transfer/Contingency/Contracts 103,844 109,915 114,695 - 0.0% 98,620 Department Total 103,844 109,915 114,695 - 0.0% 98,620
Measure Q 102 - Barstow Fire Protection District Admin
72 15.a
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 103 Measure Q - Fire Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 225 Barstow Fire Protection Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 225 Barstow Fire Protection 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 103.225.225.01 SALARIES
103.225.225.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 687,373 815,044 901,600 901,600 100% 1,033,900 103.225.225.01.103 OVERTIME 724,967 1,156,439 750,000 1,375,000 183% 1,250,000 103.225.225.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 75,426 69,875 84,000 84,000 100% 99,000 Total Salaries 1,487,766 2,041,358 1,735,600 2,360,600 136.0% 2,382,900 103.225.225.02 BENEFITS
103.225.225.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 356,684 413,147 459,700 460,000 100% 483,000 103.225.225.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 2,182 2,187 2,600 2,700 104% 2,900 103.225.225.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 26,723 31,369 50,062 50,100 100% 51,650 103.225.225.02.207 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 6,150 5,435 7,200 7,200 100% 8,100 103.225.225.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 16,482 18,220 13,600 22,000 162% 15,500 103.225.225.02.210 BENEFITS - WORKERS COMP CLAIMS (7,957) (5,958) 75,000 - 0% 50,000 103.225.225.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 10,235 10,841 10,400 16,500 159% 12,900 103.225.225.02.215 SICK LEAVE PAY OUT 27,664 - - - #DIV/0! 20,000 103.225.225.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 32,963 22,253 15,000 60,000 400% 60,000 Total Benefits 471,125 497,496 633,562 618,500 97.6% 704,050 103.225.225.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
103.225.225.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES 4,208 9,060 15,675 15,675 100% 17,500 Total Employee Development 4,208 9,060 15,675 15,675 100.0% 17,500 103.225.225.05 SUPPLIES
103.225.225.05.501 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,297 1,378 1,300 1,300 100% 1,300 103.225.225.05.523 EMS/MEDICAL SUPPLIES 33,243 31,101 30,000 31,100 104% 33,000 103.225.225.05.524 FIRE EQUIPMENT 37,888 26,809 20,210 21,000 104% 31,000 103.225.225.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 2,480 1,644 2,150 2,150 100% 3,000 Total Supplies 74,909 60,931 53,660 55,550 103.5% 68,300 103.225.225.06 SERVICES
103.225.225.06.601 VEHICLE FUEL COST 20,505 38,816 30,000 35,000 117% 35,000 103.225.225.06.608 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE COST 10,090 16,108 13,000 13,100 101% 13,500 103.225.225.06.632 PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT COSTS 578 - 10,000 2,000 20% 5,000 103.225.225.06.644 IT COST ALLOCATION 75,074 74,180 131,600 42,000 32% 119,020 103.225.225.06.645 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 11,359 14,854 33,290 24,000 72% 45,000 Total Services 117,607 143,958 217,890 116,100 53.3% 217,520 103.225.225.07 TAXES/INSURANCE/MISC
103.225.225.07.724 INSURANCE, LIABILITY 105,456 104,244 186,065 185,000 99% 303,695 103.225.225.07.733 CAP-LEASE-ENTERPRISES PROG MEAS Q FIRE 17,413 9,200 3,500 - 0% - Total Taxes/Insurance/Misc 122,869 113,444 189,565 185,000 97.6% 303,695 103.225.225.08 CAPITAL EQUIP/PROJECTS
103.225.225.08.804 GENERATOR AT FIRE STATION - 69,073 - - #DIV/0! - 103.225.225.08.805 FIRE DEPT STATION ALERTING - 58,720 - - #DIV/0! - Total Capital Equip/Projects - 127,793 - - 0.0% -
103.225.225.09 TRANSFERS/CONTINGENCY/CONTRACTS
103.225.225.09.224 TRANSFERS (225-FIRE LOAN) 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 100% 500,000 103.225.225.09.225 TRANSFER-FIRE DISTRICT 1,000,000 - - - #DIV/0! - 103.225.225.09.302 TRANSFER-DEBT SERVICE 853,694 671,617 676,878 670,000 99% 670,000 Total Transfers/Contingency/Contracts 2,353,694 1,171,617 1,176,878 1,170,000 99.4% 1,170,000 Department Total 4,632,178 4,165,657 4,022,830 4,521,425 112.4% 4,863,965 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Fire Battalion Chief 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Firefighter/Paramedic 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Total FTE's: 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Measure Q 103 - Barstow Fire Protection District
73 15.a
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 103 Measure Q - Fire Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 225 Barstow Fire Protection Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 229 Fire Admin Division 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2023-24 Expended 2025-26 103.225.229.01 SALARIES
103.225.229.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 79,699 84,663 86,400 57,000 66% 86,400 103.225.229.01.103 OVERTIME 75 - - - #DIV/0! -
103.225.229.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 11,500 12,000 12,000 12,000 100% 12,000 Total Salaries 91,274 96,663 98,400 69,000 70.1% 98,400 103.225.229.02 BENEFITS
103.225.229.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 5,859 6,430 6,800 6,800 100% 6,900 103.225.229.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 292 282 300 300 100% 300 103.225.229.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 2,677 3,096 4,941 4,950 100% 5,097 103.225.229.02.207 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 756 756 800 800 100% 800 103.225.229.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 1,080 1,123 1,400 1,400 100% 1,400 103.225.229.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 745 769 1,100 1,100 100% 1,100 103.225.229.02.227 UNFUNDED LIABILITY 367 - 158 158 100% 322 Total Benefits 11,776 12,455 15,499 15,508 100.1% 15,919 103.225.229.09 TRANSFERS/CONTINGENCY/CONTRACTS
103.225.229.09.302 TRANSFERS TO DEBT SERVICE 794 796 796 200 25% 300 Total Transfers/Contingency/Contracts 794 796 796 200 25.1% 300 Department Total 103,844 109,915 114,695 84,708 73.9% 114,619 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Fire Inspector/Arson Investigator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total FTE's: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Measure Q 103 - Barstow Fire Protection District Admin
74 15.a
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 104 General Fund II Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed 100 General Fund II Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 100 General Fund II 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26 104.100.100.02 BENEFITS
104.100.100.02.220 RETIREE HEALTH - PEMCHA 12,886 13,114 11,000 9,500 86.4% 11,000 104.100.100.02.222 RETIREE HEALTH COMPENSATION 21,093 19,109 20,000 15,500 77.5% 18,000 Total Benefits 33,979 32,223 31,000 25,000 80.6% 29,000 104.100.100.09 TRANSFERS/CONTINGENCY/CONTRAS
104.100.100.09.905 COST ALLOCATION 11,900 11,900 11,900 - 0.0% - Total Transfers/Contingency/Contras 11,900 11,900 11,900 - 0.0% - 104.100.100.14 ELECTRICITY
104.100.100.14.402 ELECTRICITY-555 S 7TH AVE 589 612 800 590 73.8% 800 Total Electricity 589 612 800 590 73.8% 800
Department Total 46,468 44,735 43,700 25,590 58.6% 29,800 CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
General Fund II (104)
General Fund II - 104
75 15.a
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 76 15.a
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) TOTAL BUDGET - $ 440,272
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Account Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE (5,323) 0 (6,803) (6,803) (13,203) 202.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS/INVESTMENTS 11,611 (1) - - #DIV/0! - 202.615.116.722 AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT (ARPA) 5,154,941 - - - #DIV/0! - 202.615.116.723 ARPA - BARSTOW CEMETARY RESTROOM REIM - - 446,672 - 0% 446,672 Total Revenue 5,166,552 (1) 446,672 - 0.0% 446,672
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Account Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
202.202.202.08.812 ARPA-FIRE SAFETY EQUIPMENT 93,046 - - - #DIV/0! - 202.202.202.08.813 ARPA-GENERATOR AT FIRE STATION #3 6,842 - - - #DIV/0! - 202.202.202.08.814 ARPA-FIRE DEPT STATION ALERTING 291,301 - - - #DIV/0! - 202.202.202.08.816 ARPA-BARSTOW CEMETERY RESTROOMS (RE - 6,802 446,672 6,400 1% 440,272 202.202.202.09.100 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND 4,770,039 - - - #DIV/0! - 202.202.202.09.400 TRANSFER TO CIP FUND - - - - #DIV/0! - Total Expenditures 5,161,229 6,802 446,672 6,400 0.0% 440,272 ENDING FUND BALANCE 0 (6,803) (6,803) (13,203) 194.1% (6,803) CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
COVID-19
This fund accounts for funds received as a result of the COVID-19 pandemics. The funding sources include the Justice Assistance Program (JAG) Grant, Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, and the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). COVID-19 Federal grant monies are administered by both the Federal government and the County of San Bernardino.

COVID-19 - 202
77 15.a
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) TOTAL BUDGET - $ 2,510,300
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Account Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE (667,666) 353,809 500,493 500,493 484,644 209.408.119.540 LOCAL PROJECTS 2,048,946 1,956,808 2,000,000 1,718,559 85.9% 1,759,300 209.500.000.001 NO 1ST AV BRIDGE-MOJAVE RIV-SANBAG AGRE 313 0 0 - #DIV/0! - 209.500.000.002 NO 1ST AVE BRIDGE-BNSF SANBAG AGREE 0 0 0 - #DIV/0! - 209.514.110.410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 31,039 81,627 0 - #DIV/0! - 209.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS/INVESTMENTS -20,755 19,726 0 - #DIV/0! - Total Revenue 2,059,543 2,058,161 2,000,000 1,718,559 85.9% 1,759,300 Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Account Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
209.209.209.08.822 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 9,021 0 104,000 52,000 50.0% 0 209.209.209.09.100 TRANSFER TO GF 16,300 16,300 16,300 16,300 100.0% 16,300 209.209.209.09.400 TRANSFER TO CIP FUND 994,867 1,751,307 2,890,800 1,176,000 40.7% 1,745,000 209.209.209.09.999 TRANSFERS TO DEBT SERVICE 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 209.209.709.09.400 TRANSFER TO CIP -REGIONAL 17,880 143,869 1,607,320 490,108 30.5% 749,000 Total Expenditures 1,038,068 1,911,477 4,618,420 1,734,408 0.0% 2,510,300 ENDING FUND BALANCE 353,809 500,493 (2,117,927) 484,644 -22.9% (266,356) CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
Measure I - 2010/2040
This fund accounts for the money generated by the one-half percent sales tax approved by the voters in 1989. The vote in 1989 approved Measure I sales tax through 2010. In 2004, San Bernardino County voters approved the extension of Measure I sales tax through 2040. Measure I funds are dedicated for transportation planning, design, construction, operations, and maintenance of public roadways.

Measure I - 209
78 15.a
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) TOTAL BUDGET - $ 6,900
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 120,411 704,992 1,435,866 1,435,866 2,181,193 210.514.110.410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 6,524 30,300 - - #DIV/0! - 210.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS/INVESTMENTS (6,051) 3,318 - - #DIV/0! - 210.524.115.530 SECTION 2105 FUNDS 133,336 154,895 158,000 162,292 102.7% 156,531 210.524.120.531 SECTION 2106 FUNDS 87,561 101,334 100,000 108,230 108.2% 104,388 210.524.125.532 SECTION 2107 FUNDS 181,670 209,664 216,000 212,742 98.5% 205,190 210.524.130.533 SECTION 2107.5 FUNDS - 6,000 6,000 6,000 100.0% 6,000 210.524.135.534 SECTION 2103 FUNDS 188,440 232,264 226,000 262,963 116.4% 253,628 Total Revenue 591,481 737,775 706,000 752,227 106.5% 725,737 Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
210.210.210.09.400 TRANSFER TO CIP FUND - - - - #DIV/0! - 210.210.210.09.999 TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS-GF EXP OFFSE 6,900 6,900 6,900 6,900 100.0% 6,900 Transfer of SB1 Funds to Fund 211 - - - - 0.0% -
Total Expenditures 6,900 6,900 6,900 6,900 0.0% 6,900
ENDING FUND BALANCE 704,992 1,435,866 2,134,966 2,181,193 102.2% 2,900,030 CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
Gas Tax
This fund accounts for the receipts and expenditures of money apportioned unter street and Highway Code sections 2105, 2106, 2107 and 2107.5 of the State of California. Gas Tax funds can be used for public streets and highways, public mass transit guideways and thier related public facilities.

Gas Tax - 210
79 15.a
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) TOTAL BUDGET - $ 1,216,788
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Account Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 1,086,086 1,668,962 2,393,553 2,393,553 3,086,725 211.514.110.410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 22,727 55,549 - - 0.0% - 211.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS INVESTMENTS (9,684) 10,137 - - 0.0% - 211.600.100.102 SB1 RMRA - ROAD MAINT ALLOCATION 569,833 658,906 650,000 696,171 107.1% 669,930 Total Revenue 582,876 724,592 650,000 696,171 107.1% 669,930 Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Account Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
211.211.211.09.400 TRANSFER TO CIP FUND - - 1,219,788 3,000 0.2% 1,216,788 Total Expenditures - - 1,219,788 3,000 0.0% 1,216,788
ENDING FUND BALANCE 1,668,962 2,393,553 1,823,765 3,086,725 169.3% 2,539,867 CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
Senate Bill 1 (SB1)
Signed into law on April 28, 2017, Senate Bill 1 (SB1) created the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program (RMRP) whose funds are dedicated to fix roads, freeways, and bridges, while also funding transit and safety projects. SB1 funding also assists agencies to improve aging infrastructure, improve road conditions, active transportation (alternative transporation methods, such as walking and bicycling), and health and safety benefits by redirecting traffic off of roadways which reduces air pollution, curtails traffic congestion and improves safety. Additionally, eligible expenditures under the RMRP include road maintenance and rehabilitation, safety proejcts, railroad grade separations, pedestrian and bicycle safety projects, transit facilities, drainage and storm water capture projects in conjunction with other allowable projects, and traffic control devices.

SB1-RMRA - 211
80 15.a
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) TOTAL BUDGET - $ 0
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Account Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 26,036 22,024 16,323 16,323 6,856 214.514.110.410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 485 624 - - 0.0% -
214.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS/INVESTMENTS (402) 624 - 180 #DIV/0! - 214.819.790.922 AWARDED FUNDS - - - 4,890 0.0% -
214.819.790.924 GANG/DRUG AB114 FUNDS - - - 863 0.0% -
Total Revenue 83 1,248 - 5,933 #DIV/0! -
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Account Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
214.214.214.07.700 ASSET SEIZURE-AWARDED FUNDS 4,095 6,948 8,700 8,000 92.0% - 214.214.214.07.710 ASSET SEIZURE-GANG/DRUG AB114 FUNDS - - 7,400 7,400 100.0% - Total Expenditures 4,095 6,948 16,100 15,400 95.7% -
ENDING FUND BALANCE 22,024 16,323 223 6,856 3072.9% 6,856 CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
Asset Seizure
The Asset Seizure fund is used to account for forfeited assets to the City of Barstow by court decisions due to asset seizures resulting from drug/gang related police investigations. Forfeited assets must be used in support of drug/gang related enforcement or prevention activities.

Asset Seizure - 214
81 15.a
Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) TOTAL BUDGET - $ 977,306
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Account Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE (19,511) (14,801) (547,868) (547,868) (83,663) 215.615.115.597 CDBG FEDERAL-COUNTY REIMB 16,777 128,700 213,809 14,300 6.7% - 215.615.115.703 P/S NEW HOPE VILLAGE REIMBURSEMENT 18,410 - 8,025 8,025 0.0% - 215.615.115.704 P/S DESERT SANCTUARY REIMBURSEMENT 15,144 7,723 8,026 10,564 131.6% - 215.615.115.709 P/S NEW LIFE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH - 10,055 - - #DIV/0! - 215.615.115.710 P/S NOBLE STRONG YOUTH PROJECT - - 8,025 13,102 163.3% - 215.615.115.711 P/S TOTAL RESTORATION CHURCH - - - - 0.0% - 215.615.115.712 N BARSTOW ADA INFRASTRUCTION IMPROVEM - 1,356 513,914 513,913 0.0% - 215.615.115.714 P/S HIGH DESERT CARE PACKAGE ON WHEELS - - 6,500 - 0.0% - 215.615.115.715 P/S REACHING OUR KIDS-YOUTH EDUC SVCS - - 8,025 10,834 0.0% - 215.615.115.717 CDBG - CV C.HARPER VENTILATION UPGRADES - - - - 0.0% 316,344 215.615.115.716 CDBG CORA HARPER HVAC REPLACEMENT - - 576,829 161,420 0.0% 414,829 215.615.115.718 LILIAN PARK-PARKING PATHS AND SHADE IMP - - - - 0.0% 203,822 215.615.115.719 P/S NEW HOPE VILLAGE HOUSING & SERVICES - - - - 0.0% 8,992 215.615.115.720 P/S DESERT MANNA FOOD RE-DIST FOOD BAN - - - - 0.0% 8,992 215.615.115.721 P/S HIGH DESER CARE PACKAGE ON WHEELS - - - - 0.0% 8,992 215.615.115.722 P/S GROWING OUTREACH GROWING OPPRTN - - - - 0.0% 8,992 Total Revenue 50,330 147,835 1,343,153 732,158 54.5% 970,963 Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Account Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
215.215.215.07.703 NEW HOPE VILLAGE-PUBLIC SERVICE 14,066 - 8,025 8,025 0.0% - 215.215.215.07.704 DESERT SANCTUARY-PUBLIC SERVICE 14,066 13,102 8,026 8,026 100.0% - 215.215.215.07.711 NEW LIFE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH P/S 13,629 (3,574) - - 0.0% - 215.215.215.07.712 NOBLE STRONG YOUTH PROJECT-PUBLIC SVC - 13,102 8,025 8,025 100.0% - 215.215.215.07.713 TOTAL RESTORATION CHURCH-PUBLIC SERVIC - - 11,000 11,000 100.0% - 215.215.215.07.714 HIGH DESERT CARE PACKAGE ON WHEELS-PS - - 6,500 6,500 0.0% - 215.215.215.07.715 REACHING OUR KIDS (R.O.K.)-PUBLIC SERVICE - - 8,025 8,025 0.0% - 215.215.215.07.716 P/S NEW HOPE VILLAGE HOUSING & SERVICES - - - - 0.0% 8,992 215.215.215.07.717 P/S DESERT MANNA FOOD RE-DIST FOOD BAN - - - - 0.0% 8,992 215.215.215.07.718 P/S HIGH DESER CARE PACKAGE ON WHEELS - - - - 0.0% 8,992 215.215.215.07.719 P/S GROWING OUTREACH GROWING OPPRTNI - - - - 0.0% 8,992 215.215.215.09.400 TRANSFER TO CIP FUND 3,860 658,270 682,536 218,352 32.0% 941,338 Total Expenditures 45,621 680,901 732,137 267,953 36.6% 977,306 ENDING FUND BALANCE (14,801) (547,868) 63,149 (83,663) -132.5% (90,006) CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) was designed to improve low-and moderate-income communities, such as Barstow. Funding is available to fund capital improvement projects, such as building community facilities, parks, and roads, as well as public services projects that provide new or increased public services to local residents or support initiatives that create new jobs. Grant funding is provided annually for the City and recipients are selected via an application process. CDBG grant monies are received on a reimburseable basis.

Grants - CDBG - 215
82 15.a
Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) TOTAL BUDGET - $2,404,053
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Account Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE (4,606,511) (4,978,847) (1,695,209) (1,695,209) (5,436,228) 217.217.116.672 LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN (LRSP) - - 72,000 35,880 49.8% 72,000 217.615.116.615 DOJ-BULLET PROOF VEST PROGRAM - 3,443 - 2,548 #DIV/0! - 217.615.116.649 2018 PD HOMELAND SEC GRANT - - - - #DIV/0! - 217.615.116.651 2019 PD HOMELAND SEC GRANT 14,897 - - - #DIV/0! - 217.615.116.652 2020 PD HOMELAND SEC GRANT 15,065 - - - #DIV/0! - 217.615.116.653 2021 PD HOMELAND SEC GRANT - - 15,241 15,241 100.0% - 217.615.116.656 LEAP GRANT-GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 59,144 - - - #DIV/0! - 217.615.116.658 DANA PARK PLAYGROUND REPLACEMENT - 190,814 - - #DIV/0! - 217.615.116.657 SB-2 7TH AVE SPECIFIC PLAN 78,619 - - - #DIV/0! - 217.615.116.671 NO 1ST AVE BRIDGE-MOJAVE RIVER-FED FUND 2,412 - 39,120 40,000 102.2% - 217.615.116.673 NO FIRST AVE BRIDGE OVER BNSF-PS&E 88.53 - - 91,904 - 0.0% 91,904 217.615.116.674 NO. 1ST AVE BRIDGE ROW 8,106 4,211,397 6,521,590 1,031,518 15.8% - 217.615.116.675 NORTH FIRST AVE BRIDGE BNSF ROW CPUC - - 2,105,999 - 0.0% - 217.615.116.676 HSIP GRANT 1,907 - - - #DIV/0! -
217.615.116.677 NO FIRST AVE YUCCA PAED 88.53 - - - - #DIV/0! - 217.615.116.678 HSIP-RIMROCK RD/BARSTOW RD - - 173,232 550 0.3% 172,685 217.615.116.679 CHP-CANNABIS TAX FUND GRANT - - 1,010 82,000 8118.8% 138,000 217.615.116.680 HSIPLN-5298(028) MAIN & BARSTOW - - 708,119 824 0.1% 707,196 217.615.116.681 ECRG - OLD GOLF SITE REHAB - - 350,000 16,440 4.7% 333,560 217.615.116.682 ECRG-BUSINESS PARK/OLD HOSPITAL - - 350,000 34,831 10.0% 315,169 217.615.166.620 CAL OES (9-1-1) 38,116 38,116 38,116 - 0.0% - 217.615.166.622 PREPARE CA JUMPSTART GRANT (CAL OES) - - 732,000 - 0.0% 732,000 Total Revenue 218,265 4,443,769 11,198,331 1,259,832 11.3% 2,562,514 Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Account Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
217.217.217.03.748 FY25 CANNABIS TAX FUND GRANT TRNING/TRA - - 84,500 2,008 2.4% 81,992 217.217.217.05.748 FY25 CANNABIS TAX FUND GRANT OFFICE SUP - - 5,500 - 0.0% 5,500 217.217.217.07.715 DOJ-BULLET PROOF VEST PROGRAM 3,443 2,548 - - #DIV/0! - 217.217.217.07.727 2019 PD HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 14,897 - - - #DIV/0! - 217.217.217.07.729 2020 PD HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 15,065 - - - #DIV/0! - 217.217.217.07.732 2021 PD HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT - - 15,241 15,241 100.0% - 217.217.217.07.744 CAL OES (9-1-1) 38,116 38,116 38,116 38,115 100.0% 39,150 217.217.217.07.745 LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN (LRSP) - 1,231 72,000 35,880 49.8% 36,120 217.217.217.07.746 PREPARE CA JUMPSTART GRANT (CAL OES) - - 732,000 - 0.0% 732,000 217.217.217.07.749 ECRG - OLD GOLF SITE REHAB - - 350,000 40,960 11.7% 309,040 217.217.217.07.750 ECRG OLD HOSPITAL & BUSINESSS PARK REHA - - 350,000 23,100 6.6% 326,900 217.217.217.08.748 FY25 CANNABIS TAX FUND GRANT CAP EQUIP - - 130,000 110,651 85.1% 19,000 217.217.217.09.400 TRANSFER TO CIP FUND 519,080 1,118,237 9,612,195 4,736,904 49.3% 854,351 Total Expenditures 590,600 1,160,131 11,389,552 5,000,851 43.9% 2,404,053 ENDING FUND BALANCE (4,978,847) (1,695,209) (1,886,430) (5,436,228) 288.2% (5,277,767) CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
Grants - Reimbursable
The Grants-Reimburseable Fund accounts for transactions related to proceeds from federal, state, and other grants restricted for various purposes specificed within the respected grant agreements. Funds accounted for in Fund 217 are tracked on a reimbursable basis.

Grants - Reimbursable - 217
83 15.a
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) TOTAL BUDGET - $ 96,813
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Account Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE (2,574) (2,946) (463) (463) 81,558 218.514.110.411 INTEREST-CAL HOME REUSE - - - 4,660 0.0% 5,000 218.514.110.419 INTEREST-STATE BEV LITTER GRANT - - - 155 0.0% 155 218.514.110.427 INTEREST-CAL OES COMM POWER (GENERATO - - - - 0.0% - 218.514.110.428 INTEREST-2017 JAG GRANT - - - - 0.0% -
218.514.110.429 INTEREST-STATE OF CA CANNABIS EQUITY ACT - - - 2,271 0.0% 2,270 218.514.110.430 INTEREST-SB 1383 LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT - - - 2,008 0.0% 2,000 218.514.110.431 INTEREST-2018 JAG GRANT - - - 615 0.0% 615 218.514.110.432 INTEREST-2019 JAG GRANT - - - 650 0.0% 650 218.514.110.433 RESERVE-FY23 OFFICER WELLNESS - - - 1,308 0.0% 1,300 218.514.110.435 INTEREST - 2021 JAG GRANT - - - 178 0.0% 178 218.514.110.436 INTEREST - 2022 JAG GRANT - - - 473 0.0% 473 218.514.110.437 INTEREST - 2023 JAG GRANT - - - 509 0.0% 509 218.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS/INVESTMENTS (372) 2,483 - 463 0.0% 462 218.615.116.604 CAL HOME GRANT REUSE - - 87,044 87,044 0.0% - 218.615.116.605 CAL OES COMM PWER RESILIENCY (GENERATO 287,682 - - - 0.0% - 218.615.116.626 2018 JAG GRANT - 20,384 - - 0.0% -
218.615.116.627 2019 JAG GRANT - 20,418 632 632 0.0% -
218.615.116.628 ST DEPT OF CONS-BEVERAGE GRANT 14,234 - 6,591 6,604 0.0% 6,500 218.615.116.632 2017 JAG GRANT 17,733 - - - 0.0% -
218.615.116.633 STATE OF CA CANNABIS EQUITY ACT GRANT - 75,000 - 140 0.0% - 218.615.116.634 SB 1383 LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT 26,766 8,376 75,000 - 0.0% 75,000 218.615.116.635 FY22/23 OFFICER WELLNESS & MENTAL - 8,154 19,845 19,846 0.0% - 218.615.116.636 2020 JAG GRANT - 19,329 - - #DIV/0! -
218.615.116.637 2021 JAG GRANT - 12,854 7,634 7,635 100.0% - 218.615.116.638 2022 JAG GRANT - - 20,252 20,252 0.0% - 218.615.116.639 2023 JAG GRANT - - 21,813 21,813 0.0% - Total Revenue 346,044 166,998 238,811 177,256 74.2% 95,112 Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Account Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
218.218.218.07.711 STATE BEVERAGE / LITTER GRANT 14,234 - 6,591 - 0.0% - 218.218.218.07.717 2017 JAG GRANT 17,733 - - - 0.0% -
218.218.218.07.722 2018 JAG GRANT - 20,384 - - #DIV/0! - 218.218.218.07.723 2019 JAG GRANT - 20,418 - - #DIV/0! - 218.218.218.07.724 2020 JAG GRANT - 19,329 - - #DIV/0! - 218.218.218.07.725 2021 JAG GRANT - 12,854 - - #DIV/0! - 218.218.218.07.726 2022 JAG GRANT - - 20,252 20,252 0.0% - 218.218.218.07.727 2023 JAG GRANT - - - - 0.0% 21,813
218.218.218.07.740 HEAP GRANT - - - - 0.0% -
218.218.218.07.750 CAL OES - GENERATOR PROJECT 287,682 - - - 0.0% - 218.218.218.07.751 STATE OF CA CANNABIS EQUITY ACT GRANT - 75,000 - - 0.0% - 218.218.218.07.752 SB 1383 LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT 26,766 8,376 21,350 21,350 100.0% 75,000 218.218.218.07.753 FY22/23 OFFICER WELLNESS & MENTAL HEALT - 8,154 12,000 - 0.0% - 218.218.218.08.802 SB 1383 LOCAL ASSIST GRANT-TURF TENDER - - 53,650 53,633 0.0% - Total Expenditures 346,416 164,515 113,843 95,235 83.7% 96,813 ENDING FUND BALANCE (2,946) (463) 124,505 81,558 65.5% 79,857 CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
Grants - Prefunded
The Grant Fund accounts for transactions related to proceeds from grants restricted for various purposes specified in the respective grant agreements.

Currently, the grant fund tracks expenditures related to the State Beverage Litter Grant, JAG Grants, SB1383 Local Assistance Grant, and the Police Officer Wellness and Mental Health Program. Funds accounted for in Fund 218 are prefunded grants.

Grants - Prefunded - 218
84 15.a
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) TOTAL BUDGET - $ 190,500
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Account Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE (788) 170,419 55,255 55,255 125,429 219.514.110.410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 3,061 6,066 - - 0.0% - 219.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS/INVESTMENTS (782) 1,309 - - 0.0% - 219.600.100.022 FY22 P/S COPS GRANT 150,170 - - - 0.0% - 219.600.100.023 FY23 P/S COPS GRANT 100,024 - - - 0.0% - 219.600.100.024 FY24 P/S COPS GRANT - 100,091 100,000 - 0.0% - 219.600.100.025 FY25 P/S COPS GRANT - - - 100,127 0.0% - 219.600.100.026 FY26 P/S COPS GRANT - - - - 0.0% 100,000 219.600.101.022 FRONTLINE LAW ENF ALLOC 65,282 86,215 95,000 94,693 99.7% 95,000 Total Revenue 317,755 193,681 195,000 194,820 99.9% 195,000 Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Account Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
219.219.219.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES - - 12,100 12,100 0.0% 13,500 219.219.219.05.501 OFFICE SUPPLIES - 17,445 2,500 - 0.0% 2,000 219.219.219.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 11,000 26,069 35,000 4,200 12.0% 35,000 219.219.219.07.701 PD K-9 EXPENDITURES 357 16,903 20,000 19,995 100.0% 25,000 219.219.219.08.801 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 42,623 26,629 20,000 8,674 43.4% 20,000 219.219.219.08.804 ADMINISTRATIVE COMMAND VEHICLE 12,567 - - - 0.0% - 219.219.219.08.805 POLICE DEPT BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS - 141,799 22,798 19,677 86.3% 20,000 219.219.219.09.905 COST ALLOCATION 80,000 80,000 50,000 60,000 120.0% 75,000 Total Expenditures 146,547 308,845 162,398 124,646 76.8% 190,500 ENDING FUND BALANCE 170,419 55,255 87,857 125,429 142.8% 129,929 CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
Public Safety COPS Program
In 1997, the California State Legislature created the Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) Program, which is a noncompetitive grant where cities receive state funds to augment public safety expenditures. Funds must be used to benefit front-line law enforcement efforts. The minimum grant allocation for FY 24/25 is $100K.

COPS Program - 219
85 15.a
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) TOTAL BUDGET - $ 6,538,500
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Account Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Received 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE (4,993,387) (3,668,042) (2,511,336) (2,511,336) (2,996,311) 225.401.111.112 PROPERTY TAX COLLECTION 4,041,853 4,328,003 4,100,000 4,100,000 100.0% 4,450,000 225.401.111.113 HOMEOWNERS PROP TAX RELIEF 24,793 12,056 25,000 16,000 64.0% 15,000 225.401.111.114 RDA RESIDUAL TAX PAYMENT 1,757,102 2,004,613 1,750,000 1,750,000 100.0% 2,150,000 225.506.322.296 IMPACT FEES 3,956 2,418 5,000 5,000 100.0% 5,000 225.514.110.410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS - - - - 0.0% -
225.514.110.411 GASB 87 - INTEREST REVENUE 6,683 6,615 - - 0.0% - 225.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS/INVESTMENTS (7,400) 4,950 - 3,076 0.0% - 225.804.790.927 WC INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT 124,262 - - - 0.0% - 225.819.783.631 GASB 87 - LEASE CONTRA ACCT (4,082) (4,087) - - 0.0% - 225.819.783.632 CELL TOWER LEASE 10,314 11,119 11,000 8,700 79.1% 9,000 225.819.783.633 DONATIONS/SPONSORSHIPS - 500 - - 0.0% - 225.819.784.910 SALE OF EQUIPMENT 5,230 - - - 0.0% -
225.819.788.920 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 65 588 - - 0.0% -
225.819.788.924 TRAINING ATTENDEE INCOME - - - - 0.0% - 225.819.788.929 REIMBURSEMENTS - 861 - 122 0.0% -
225.819.788.999 GASB 87 - LEASE PROCEEDS - - - - 0.0% - 225.819.794.912 STRIKE TEAM REIMBURSEMENT 196,963 - 311,200 395,350 0.0% - 225.819.794.923 FY19 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 12,152 - - - 0.0% - 225.819.794.920 HSGP - HAZMAT GRANT - - - - 0.0% -
225.819.794.929 INCIDENT REPORT 215 761 100 95 95.0% 100 225.900.820.103 TRANSFER IN - MEASURE Q FIRE 1,000,000 - - - 0.0% - 225.900.820.302 TRANSFER IN - DEBT SERVICE - - - - 0.0% - 225.900.820.995 TRANSFERS IN - MEASURE Q 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 100.0% 500,000 Total Revenue 7,672,106 6,868,397 6,702,300 6,778,343 101.1% 7,129,100 Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Account Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
225.225.225 - BFPD
225.225.225.01 SALARIES
225.225.225.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 1,893,844 2,005,468 2,356,500 2,356,500 100% 2,193,200 225.225.225.01.103 OVERTIME 614,257 47,956 - 250,000 #DIV/0! 250,000 225.225.225.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 188,949 203,625 222,000 222,000 100% 201,000 225.225.225.01.119 OT - STATE OF EMERGENCY COVID 19 6,288 - - - #DIV/0! - Total Salaries 2,703,338 2,257,049 2,578,500 2,828,500 110% 2,644,200 225.225.225.02 BENEFITS
225.225.225.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 964,425 1,043,099 1,198,200 1,198,200 100% 1,029,600 225.225.225.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 5,354 5,527 6,500 6,500 100% 6,200 225.225.225.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 64,162 82,087 131,005 131,005 100% 135,159 225.225.225.02.206 BENEFITS - DEFERRED COMP 3,244 1,869 2,000 2,000 100% 2,000 225.225.225.02.207 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 20,406 15,355 18,000 18,000 100% 17,100 225.225.225.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 38,685 43,050 38,500 38,500 100% 33,000 225.225.225.02.210 BENEFITS - WORKERS COMP CLAIMS 317,729 94,431 300,000 300,000 100% - 225.225.225.02.213 BILINGUAL SERVICES - 28 - 540 #DIV/0! 800 225.225.225.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 21,740 25,372 26,900 26,900 100% 27,300 225.225.225.02.215 SICK LEAVE PAY OUT 21,851 43,576 - - #DIV/0! - 225.225.225.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 104,317 87,263 40,000 - 0% - 225.225.225.02.222 RETIREE HEALTH COMPENSATION 38,524 49,405 36,500 58,000 159% 60,000 Total Benefits 1,600,437 1,491,061 1,797,605 1,779,645 99% 1,311,159 225.225.225.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
225.225.225.03.300 EDUCATIONAL REIMBURSEMENT 475 1,000 2,000 2,000 100% - 225.225.225.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES 3,041 2,626 8,175 5,646 69% 10,000 225.225.225.03.305 DUES/SUBS/MEMBERSHIPS 3,921 3,591 3,770 1,033 27% 3,775 Total Employee Development 7,437 7,217 13,945 8,679 62% 13,775 CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
Barstow Fire Protection District (BFPD)
The Barstow Fire Protection District (BFPD) became a component unit of the City on November 17, 2010. Prior to this date, the District was an independent district. The District will continue to be operated according to the applicable state fire protection district laws and the property taxes collected within the district will be used exclusively for the administration and operational costs of the district. The City Council acts as the District's governing board and exerts significant influence over its operations. Separate financial statements are produced for the District.

Barstow Fire Protection District (BFPD) - 225
86 15.a
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Account Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
225.225.225.04 COMMUNICATIONS
225.225.225.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 73,661 82,529 83,050 87,590 105% 87,000 Total Communications 73,661 82,529 83,050 87,590 105% 87,000 225.225.225.05 SUPPLIES
225.225.225.05.501 OFFICE SUPPLIES 5,162 4,968 4,500 4,500 100% 4,968 225.225.225.05.523 EMS/MEDICAL SUPPLIES 28,439 46,143 39,000 39,000 100% 43,000 225.225.225.05.524 FIRE EQUIPMENT 9,097 15,107 10,000 10,000 100% 15,107 225.225.225.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 16,510 12,058 10,000 10,000 100% 7,000 Total Supplies 59,208 78,277 63,500 63,500 100% 70,075
225.225.225.06 SERVICES
225.225.225.06.601 VEHICLE FUEL COST 55,137 33,719 50,000 50,000 100% - 225.225.225.06.608 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE COST 108,116 78,386 70,000 70,000 100% 70,000 225.225.225.06.612 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 42,262 41,486 48,000 48,000 100% 50,000 225.225.225.06.626 PROF SERV. LEGAL 117,867 20,726 40,000 40,000 100% - 225.225.225.06.628 AUDIT EXPENSE 17,245 17,383 18,201 18,201 100% - 225.225.225.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 32,363 39,782 41,200 41,200 100% 41,500 225.225.225.06.631 MEETING STIPEND 4,375 4,875 5,000 5,000 100% 5,000 225.225.225.06.632 PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT - FIRE 8,439 8,194 10,000 10,000 100% 25,000 225.225.225.06.633 INCIDENT SUPPORT 2,176 3,108 4,000 4,000 100% 5,000 225.225.225.06.635 FIRE PREVENTION - 1,809 2,500 2,500 100% 3,000 225.225.225.06.637 SHARED DISPATCH COSTS 205,000 205,000 205,000 205,000 100% 205,000 225.225.225.06.644 IT COST ALLOCATION 14,895 10,000 25,000 25,000 100% 25,170 225.225.225.06.645 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 25,089 7,627 38,000 38,000 100% 45,000 Total Services 632,964 472,095 556,901 556,901 100% 474,670 225.225.225.07 TAXES/INSURANCE/MISCELLANEOUS
225.225.225.07.701 PRINCIPAL-GF LOAN REPAYMENT - - 500,000 500,000 100% 500,000 225.225.225.07.705 INSURANCE CLAIMS - - 2,500 2,500 100% - 225.225.225.07.720 INSURANCE, PROPERTY 27,827 39,982 47,035 47,035 100% 52,488 225.225.225.07.724 INSURANCE, LIABILITY 134,261 174,415 217,246 217,246 100% 250,106 225.225.225.07.733 CAP-LEASE-ENTERPRISE PROG 658 731 500 500 100% - Total Taxes/Insurance/Misc 162,746 215,128 767,281 767,281 100% 802,594 225.225.225.08 CAPITAL EQUIP/PROJECTS
225.225.225.08.808 CAL OES FIRE TRUCK PURCHASE - - 40,000 40,000 100% - Total Capital Equip/Projects - - 40,000 40,000 100% -
225.225.225.09 TRANSFERS/CONTINGENCY/CONTRAS
225.225.225.09.905 COST ALLOCATION 884,000 884,000 884,000 884,000 100% 884,000 Total Transfers/Contingency/Contras 884,000 884,000 884,000 884,000 100% 884,000 225.225.225.14 ELECTRICITY
225.225.225.14.460 ELECTRICITY 89,814 92,165 85,000 108,800 128% 110,000 Total Electricity 89,814 92,165 85,000 108,800 128% 110,000 225.225.225.24 NATURAL GAS
225.225.225.24.460 NATURAL GAS/861 BARSTOW ROAD 10,983 9,536 10,000 7,600 76% 10,000 225.225.225.24.461 NATURAL GAS/2600 WEST MAIN STREET 3,907 2,838 3,500 2,900 83% 3,500 Total Natural Gas 14,890 12,374 13,500 10,500 78% 13,500 225.225.225.34 WATER
225.225.225.34.460 WATER 13,400 19,385 18,000 25,625 142% 25,000 Total Water 13,400 19,385 18,000 25,625 142% 25,000
Barstow Fire Protection District (BFPD) - 225
87 15.a
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Account Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
225.225.227 - BFPD GRANTS
225.225.227.08.813 FY19 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 12,152 - - - #DIV/0! - Total Capital Equip/Projects 12,152 - - - #DIV/0! -
225.225.229 - BFPD ADMINISTRATION
225.225.229.01 SALARIES
225.225.229.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 66,626 70,520 71,500 71,500 100% 71,500 225.225.229.01.103 OVERTIME 291 436 - - #DIV/0! -
225.225.229.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 11,500 12,000 12,000 12,000 100% 12,000 Total Salaries 78,417 82,956 83,500 83,500 100% 83,500
225.225.229.02 BENEFITS
225.225.229.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 9,198 11,128 11,500 11,500 100% 11,500 225.225.229.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 268 254 300 300 100% 300 225.225.229.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 2,216 2,568 4,097 4,097 100% 4,227 225.225.229.02.207 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 756 756 800 800 100% 800 225.225.229.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 1,023 1,088 1,200 1,200 100% 1,200 225.225.229.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 704 750 900 900 100% 1,000 225.225.229.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 134 912 - - #DIV/0! - Total Benefits 14,299 17,456 18,797 18,797 100% 19,027
Total Expenditures 6,346,762 5,711,691 7,003,579 7,263,318 104% 6,538,500 ENDING FUND BALANCE (3,668,042) (2,511,336) (2,812,615) (2,996,311) 1 (2,405,711) Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

Fire Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fire Captain 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Fire Engineer 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Firefighter/Paramedic 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Firefighter/EMT 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Total FTE's: 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Barstow Fire Protection District (BFPD) - 227 / 229
88 15.a
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) TOTAL BUDGET - $4,000
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Account Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Received 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE (96,543) (100,613) (104,813) (104,813) 0.0% (105,338) 230.819.788.920 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME - - 4,000 4,000 4,000 Total Revenue - - 4,000 4,000 0.0% 4,000
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
230.230.230.06.628 AUDIT EXPENSE 4,070 4,200 4,330 4,200 97.0% 3,675 230.230.230.06.630 FEES/SERVICES - - 325 325 100.0% 325 Total Expenditures 4,070 4,200 4,655 4,525 97.2% 4,000
ENDING FUND BALANCE (100,613) (104,813) (105,468) (105,338) 99.9% (105,338) CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
Odessa Water District
Established on July 5, 1993, pursuant to the legislation approved by the State in 1991, the District was founded to provide water resources to the City. The City Council acts as the District's governing board and exerts significant influence over its operations. The City is responsible for Odessa's obligations.

Separate financial statements are produced annually.

Odessa Water District - 230
89 15.a
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) TOTAL BUDGET - $325
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Account Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Received 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE (14,933) (15,308) (15,558) (15,558) (15,583) 232.819.788.900 FOUNDATION DONATIONS - - - - 0.0% -
Total Revenue - - - - 0.0% -
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Account Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
232.232.232.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 375 250 325 25 7.7% 325 Total Expenditures 375 250 325 25 7.7% 325
ENDING FUND BALANCE (15,308) (15,558) (15,883) (15,583) 98.1% (15,908) CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
Barstow Harvey House Foundation
Established on January 16, 1992, the Foundations was formed to promote development of the historical Harvey House, to improve, renovate, and maintain the historic significance of the site. The City Council acts as the Foundation's governing board. The City is responsible for the Foundation's obligations and separate financial statements are not produced for the Foundation.

Barstow Harvey House Foundation - 232
90 15.a
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) TOTAL BUDGET - $325
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Account Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Received 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 1,836 1,988 1,787 1,787 1,766
233.514.110.410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 37 59 - - 0.0% -
233.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS/INVESTMENTS (10) 15 - 4 100.0% - 233.819.788.900 FOUNDATION DONATIONS 500 - - - 200.0% - Total Revenue 527 74 - 4 0.0% -
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
233.233.233.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 375 275 335 25 0.0% 325 Total Expenditures 375 275 335 25 7.5% 325
ENDING FUND BALANCE 1,988 1,787 1,452 1,766 121.6% 1,441 CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
Barstow Community Services Foundation
Formed on October 7, 2013, as a non-profit public benefit corporation, the Foundation was formed to receive, invest and utilize funds and property acquired through the solicitation of contributions, donations, grants, gifts, bequests for the purposes of fostering and promoting community interests, events, and programs promoting and celebrating Barstow, its history and contributions, and any other purpose beneficial to the public. The City Council serves as the Foundation's governing board. The City is responsible for the Foundation's obligations and separate financial statements are not produced.

Barstow Community Services Foundation - 233
91 15.a
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) TOTAL BUDGET - $0
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Account Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 128,753 194,155 201,228 201,228 201,228 235.408.115.535 TRANSPORTATION TAX 63,641 - - - 0.0% -
235.514.110.410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 2,931 5,655 - - 0.0% - 235.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS/INVESTMENTS (1,170) 1,418 - - 0.0% - Total Revenue 65,402 7,073 - - 0.0% -
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Account Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
235.235.235.09.400 TRANSFER TO CIP FUND - - - - 0.0% -
Total Expenditures - - - - 0.0% -
ENDING FUND BALANCE 194,155 201,228 201,228 201,228 100.0% 201,228 CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
Local Transportation Fund (LTF)
The Local Transportation Fund (LTF) is a funding source established by the Transportation Development Act (TDA) of 1971 which provides funding to be allocated to transit and non-transit related purposes that comply with regional transportation plans, such as streets and roads, construction and maintenance. LTF is derived from a 1/4 cent of the general sales tax collected statewide which is returned by the State Board of Equalization to each County which allocates the LTF funds within the County based on population.

Local Transportation Fund - 235
92 15.a
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) TOTAL BUDGET - $2,667,027
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Account Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE - (1) (1) (1) 1
302.819.784.895 BOND PROCEEDS - - - - 0.0% -
302.900.820.100 TRANSFERS FROM GENERAL FUND 1,843,809 1,848,441 1,845,914 1,845,914 100.0% 1,848,252 302.900.820.102 TRANSFER FROM MEASURE Q 25,810 25,875 25,840 25,840 100.0% 25,872 302.900.820.103 TRANSFERS FROM MEASURE Q-FIRE 854,488 672,413 677,674 677,674 100.0% 677,678 302.900.820.605 TRANSFER FROM WWTP 93,114 93,348 93,220 93,220 100.0% 93,338 302.900.820.650 TRANSFER FROM SOLID WASTE 21,839 21,894 21,864 21,864 100.0% 21,892 Total Revenue 2,839,060 2,661,970 2,664,512 2,664,512 100.0% 2,667,031 Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
302.302.302.06.635 BOND ADMN FEES 2,500 2,500 - - 0.0% - 302.302.302.06.636 DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS 2,850 2,850 - - 0.0% - 302.302.302.07.710 INTEREST EXPENSE-2021 LEASE REV BOND 262,883 221,478 201,022 201,022 100.0% 201,022 302.302.302.07.711 INTEREST EXPENSE-2022 PENSION OBLG BONDS 961,442 831,428 792,634 792,632 100.0% 750,149 302.302.302.07.715 PRINCIPAL EXP-2021 LEASE REVENUE BONDS 589,386 448,714 475,856 475,856 100.0% 475,856 302.302.302.07.716 PRINCIPAL EXP-2022 PENS OBLG BONDS 1,020,000 1,155,000 1,195,000 1,195,000 100.0% 1,240,000 Total Expenditures 2,839,061 2,661,970 2,664,512 2,664,510 100.0% 2,667,027 ENDING FUND BALANCE (1) (1) (1) 1 5
CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
Debt Service
Debt Service Funds are generally used to accumulate financial resources that are restricted, committed, or assigned for future debt service payments. This fund was established to accumulate financial resources restricted for lease revenue and pension obligations bond payments and record the payments.

Debt Service - 302
93 15.a
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 94 15.a
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) Capital Projects
TOTAL BUDGET - $ 8,697,746
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Account Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26

BEGINNING FUND BALANCE - - - - -
400.900.820.100 TRANSFERS FROM GENERAL FUND - - 417,170 32,480 0.0% - 400.900.820.102 TRANSFERS FROM MEASURE Q - - - - 0.0% 890,000 400.900.820.202 TRANSFERS FROM COVID-19 - - - - 0.0% -
400.900.820.209 TRANSFERS FROM MEASURE I (LOCAL) 994,867 1,751,307 2,890,800 1,176,000 40.7% 1,745,000 400.900.820.211 TRANSFERS FROM SB-1 - - 1,219,788 3,000 0.2% 1,216,788 400.900.820.215 TRANSFERS FROM CDBG 3,860 658,270 901,279 162,000 18.0% 934,995 400.900.820.217 TRANSFERS FROM GRANTS - REIMBURSEABLE 519,080 1,118,237 9,612,195 4,736,904 49.3% 854,351 400.900.820.235 TRANSFERS FROM LTF - - - - 0.0% -
400.900.820.425 TRANSFERS FROM DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE - - 391,745 102,220 0.0% 250,201 400.900.820.605 TRANSFERS FROM WASTEWATER 2,404,176 235,151 425,110 - 0.0% 450,000 400.900.820.709 TRANSFERS FROM MEASURE I (REGIONAL) 17,880 143,869 1,607,320 490,108 30.5% 2,356,411 400.900.820.901 TRANSFERS FROM LOW/MOD - - - - 0.0% -
Total Revenue 3,939,863 3,906,835 17,465,407 6,702,712 38.4% 8,697,746 Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Account Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
400.801.128.15.217 NORTH 1ST AV BRIDGE-MOJAVE RIVER 88.53% 14,728 24,393 11,351 18,000 158.6% - 400.801.128.15.709 NORTH 1ST AV BRIDGE-MOJAVE RIV 1,908 3,160 1,471 3,200 217.5% - 400.801.128.20.209 NORTH FIRST AVE BRIDGE MOJAVE RIVER-PRO - - 100,000 10,000 10.0% 90,000 400.801.129.16.217 NO FIRST AVE BRIDGE PS&E BNSF 88.53% 122,521 54,531 91,904 91,904 100.0% - 400.801.129.16.709 NORTH FIRST AVE BRIDGE PS&E BNSF 11.47 15,874 7,065 11,908 11,908 100.0% 50,000 400.801.129.17.217 NORTH FIRST AVE BRIDGE BNSF ROW 88.53% 757 1,031,518 6,521,590 4,600,000 70.5% - 400.801.129.17.709 1ST AVE BRIDGE OVER BNSF ROW-REGIONAL 98 133,644 844,941 475,000 56.2% 1,557,411 400.801.129.20.209 FIRST AVE BRIDGE BNSF-PROJ MGMT 289,437 96,808 50,000 50,000 100.0% - 400.801.129.23.209 N FIRST AVE BRIDGE-BNSF (CONSTRUCTION) 705,430 1,573,337 1,000,000 1,000,000 100.0% - 400.801.129.23.217 N FIRST AVE BRIDGE BNSF ROW CPUC - 100% 367,820 - 2,105,999 - 0.0% - 400.801.130.25.209 WEST SECT 7 DESIGN MGMT & INSP (PHASE 2) - - 75,000 75,000 100.0% - 400.801.131.20.211 SB1-PAVEMENT PRESERVATION 2020* - - 677,788 - 0.0% 677,788 400.801.131.20.425 PAVEMENT PRESERVATION 2020* - - 135,201 - 0.0% 135,201 400.801.131.25.209 PAVEMENT PRESERVATION 4 - DESIGN - - 30,000 30,000 100.0% - 400.801.132.20.211 SPEED SURVEY & DATA COLLECTION PRJ SB1 - - 42,000 - 0.0% 42,000 400.801.137.23.215 N. BARSTOW ADA INFRASTRUCTURE IMPRVMN - 515,270 27,245 - 0.0% - 400.801.139.23.209 PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE CORRIDORS (ATP) - 1,470 496,000 3,000 0.6% 493,000 400.801.140.23.209 RIMROCK RD RECON - BARSTOW RD TO AVE H - 14,892 500,000 3,000 0.6% 597,000 400.801.140.23.709 RIMROCK RD RECON - BARSTOW RD TO AVE H - - 749,000 - 0.0% 749,000 400.801.141.24.209 LENWOOD RD - AGATE RD TO RR TRACKS - 64,800 64,800 - 0.0% - 400.801.142.24.215 ADA CURB, RAMPS, GUTTERS & INFRASTRUCT - - 222,739 - 0.0% - 400.802.217.21.425 STORM DRAIN/FLOOD CONTROL LENWOOD - - 40,000 - 0.0% 40,000 400.803.316.17.217 MAIN ST & BARSTOW RD TRAFFIC SIG-HSIP 1,907 1,029 708,119 15,000 2.1% 693,119 400.803.316.21.211 SB-1 MAIN ST & BARSTOW RD TRAFFIC SIGNAL - - 500,000 3,000 0.6% 497,000 400.803.316.21.425 MAIN ST & BARSTOW RD TRAFFIC SIGNAL-DIF - - 75,000 - 0.0% 75,000 400.803.317.18.217 RIMROCK/BARSTOW RD TRAFFIC SIGNAL-HSIP - 6,768 173,232 12,000 6.9% 161,232 400.803.317.23.209 RIMROCK RD/BARSTOW RD TRAFFIC SIGNAL-M - - 575,000 5,000 0.9% 565,000 400.803.319.20.605 WW AEROBIC DIGESTER PROJ 1,850,530 235,151 - - #DIV/0! - 400.803.320.23.605 EQUIPMENT REFURBISHMENT 130,054 - - - 0.0% - 400.803.321.23.605 IRRIGATION STATION / POND PUMPING 423,592 - - - 0.0% 450,000 400.803.322.25.605 WEST IRRIGATION PROJECT - - 425,110 - 0.0% - 400.804.400.22.217 DANA PARK PLAYGROUND REPLACEMENT 11,347 (1) - - #DIV/0! - 400.804.417.20.215 CDBG-LILLIAN PARK ADA RESTROOMS 3,860 - - - 0.0% - 400.804.417.24.100 FOGLESONG PARK BALL FIELD LIGHTS - - 384,690 - 0.0% - 400.804.417.24.102 FOGLESONG PARK BALL FIELD LIGHTS - - 108,192 - 0.0% - 400.806.600.24.100 PD/CITY HALL EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPLA - - 32,481 32,480 0.0% - 400.806.600.24.425 PD/CITY HALL EMERGENCY GENERATOR REPLA - - 108,272 102,220 0.0% - Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Account Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
400.806.618.22.215 CDBG-MOJAVE RIVER VALLEY MUSEUM ROOF - 143,000 - - #DIV/0! - 400.806.622.25.215 CDBGCV-CORA HARPER HVAC REPLACEMENT - - - - #DIV/0! 316,344 400.806.621.25.215 CDBG-CORA HARPER HVAC REPLACEMENT - - 576,829 162,000 0.0% 414,829 CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
The Capital Projects Fund is used to track the expenditures of capital improvement construction or new construction projects. The fund encompasses all funding sources and is used to monitor construction-related projects.

Capital Projects - 400
CAPITAL PROJECTS (Continued)
Capital Projects - 400
95 15.a
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 400.806.621.25.102 CORA HARPER HVAC REPLACEMENT - - - - 0.0% 890,000 400.804.418.26.215 LILIAN PARK PARKING,PATHS & SHADE IMPMNT - - - - 0.0% 203,822 Total Expenditures 3,939,863 3,906,835 17,465,862 6,702,712 38.4% 8,697,746 ENDING FUND BALANCE - - (455) - 38.4% -
96 15.a
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) Development Fund
TOTAL BUDGET -$ 250,201
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Account Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 834,430 908,286 966,600 966,600 885,863 425.415.115.600 LENWOOD-FLOOD CONTROL DEV FEE 8,138 2,152 - 300 0.0% 300 425.415.115.601 LENWOOD-TRAFFIC SIGNAL DEV FEE 2,347 621 - 3,500 0.0% 3,000 425.415.115.602 LENWOOD-MEDIAN DEVELOPMENT FEE 1,304 345 - 1,250 0.0% 1,200 425.415.115.603 LENWOOD-WATER DEV FEES 13,837 3,659 - 425 0.0% 450 425.514.110.410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 15,378 26,884 - - 0.0% - 425.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS/INVESTMENTS (4,291) 6,573 - 1,945 0.0% 1,000 425.515.115.600 LAW ENFORCEMENT IMPACT DEV FEE 733 356 - 272 0.0% 350 425.515.115.601 STREET SIGNAL BRIDGES DEV IMPACT FEE 21,184 6,913 - 3,260 0.0% 3,300 425.515.115.602 STORM DRAIN DEV IMPACT FEE 3,101 1,558 - 1,223 0.0% 1,750 425.515.115.603 GENERAL FACILITIES DEV IMPACT FEE 1,099 533 - 408 0.0% 750 425.515.115.604 PUBLIC MEETING DEV IMPACT FEE 1,698 1,358 1,400 1,400 0.0% 1,500 425.515.115.605 PARKS/OPEN SPACE DEV IMPACT FEE 7,639 6,111 6,200 6,200 0.0% 6,500 425.515.115.606 AQUATIC FACILITIES DEV IMPACT FEE 1,188 951 1,000 1,000 0.0% 1,100 425.515.115.607 DEVELOPMENT FEE - FIRE DEPT 500 300 300 300 0.0% 500 Total Revenue 73,856 58,314 8,900 21,483 0.0% 21,700
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Account Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
425.425.425.09.400 TRANSFER TO CIP FUND - - 283,473 102,220 0.0% 250,201 Total Expenditures - - 283,473 102,220 0.0% 250,201
ENDING FUND BALANCE 908,286 966,600 692,027 885,863 128.0% 657,362 CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
The Development Fund is used to account for revenue collected through Development Impact Fees (DIF). These funds are collected during the building permit process and funds can only be used in the areas in which they are collected. The fund also tracks DIF-related expenditures.

Development Fund - 425
97 15.a
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 98 15.a
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) Public Improvement District (PID) 91-1
TOTAL BUDGET - $ 0
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Account Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 96,335 97,611 101,166 101,166 101,369 516.514.110.410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 1,703 2,843 - - 0.0% - 516.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS/INVESTMENTS (427) 712 - 203 0.0% - Total Revenue 1,276 3,555 - 203 0.0% -
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Account Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
- - - - 0.0% -
Total Expenditures - - - - 0.0% -
ENDING FUND BALANCE 97,611 101,166 101,166 101,369 100.2% 101,369 CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
Public Improvement District (PID) 91-1 accounts for the receipt of assessments relating to Public Improvement District 91-1 and the disposition of the assessments under the terms of the agreement.

Public Improvement District (PID) 91-1 - 516
99 15.a
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) Landscape District & Light Maintenance District
TOTAL BUDGET - $15,900
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Account Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Received 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 86,365 96,885 117,323 117,323 130,680 530.514.110.410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 1,646 3,037 - - 0.0% - 530.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS/INVESTMENTS (578) 785 - 237 0.0% - 530.915.115.935 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT INCOME 19,555 19,519 18,000 18,000 100.0% 19,000 530.915.115.940 LIGHTING ASSESSMENT INCOME 2,593 2,573 2,000 2,000 100.0% 2,500 Total Revenue 23,217 25,914 20,000 20,237 101.2% 21,500 Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Account Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Received 2025-26
530.530.530.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 440 - - - #DIV/0! - 530.530.530.06.612 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE - - 4,000 - 0.0% - 530.530.530.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 6,670 - - - #DIV/0! -
530.530.530.09.905 COST ALLOCATION - - 1,900 - 0.0% -
530.530.530.14.433 ELECTRICITY-SILVERADO DEVELOPMENT 131 104 2,000 180 9.0% 2,000 530.530.530.34.478 WATER-SILVERADO / TRINITY 3,825 4,172 5,000 5,400 108.0% 5,500 530.530.530.34.481 WATER-SILVERADO-LOVATO & NELSON 1,631 1,201 3,000 1,300 43.3% 3,000 Total Expenditures 12,696 5,477 15,900 6,880 43.3% 10,500 ENDING FUND BALANCE 96,885 117,323 121,423 130,680 141,680 CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
The Landscape District & Light Maintenance District Fund account for the receipt of tax roll assessments and disposition of the assessments under the terms of the agreement. Agreements relate to developments, whether residential or commercial, where landscape and/or lighting is maintained by the City as a result of the development.

Landscape District & Light Maintenance District - 530
100

15.a
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Received 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 13,288,503 13,057,146 13,951,754 13,951,754 16,478,517 605.514.110.410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 20,827 27,984 - - #DIV/0! - 605.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS/INVESTMENTS 1,513 5,506 - 3,341 #DIV/0! - 605.709.135.801 SEWER SERVICE FEE 131,407 60,500 35,000 35,000 100% 15,350 605.709.135.802 MUNIS - SEWER SERVICE FEE 4,921,090 5,187,272 4,840,000 5,192,025 107% 5,150,000 605.709.135.804 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES - - 2,500 2,500 100% - 605.709.135.805 SUPP ENVIROMENTAL & DISCHARGE FEES 170,556 130,792 110,000 110,000 100% 98,750 605.709.140.802 SEWER FEE PENALTY/INTEREST - 19,632 7,000 7,000 100% 10,000 605.709.140.803 MUNIS - SEWER PENALTY & INTEREST 123,526 119,954 106,000 106,000 100% 107,550 605.709.140.804 MUNIS - RETURN CHECK SERVICE CHARGE 400 275 100 200 200% 200 605.709.140.818 LIENS-SEWER PENALTY & INTEREST 52,566 86,061 32,150 32,150 100% 35,250 605.710.120.619 SEWER CONNECTIONS 70,560 7,500 13,500 13,500 100% 13,500 605.805.785.910 LIEN/RELEASE/CO/PROP CHG FEES 7,951 7,537 7,000 7,000 100% 7,250 605.819.784.910 SALES PROPERTY/EQUIPMENT - - - - #DIV/0! - 605.819.788.920 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 33,219 2,279 2,000 2,000 100% 2,500 605.819.788.923 CREDIT CARD CONVENIENCE FEES 253 - 200 200 100% 1,000 605.819.788.927 ANNUAL DISCHARGE PERMITS 200 - 100 100 100% 250 605.819.788.928 DISCHARGE PERMIT FINES 9,850 4,100 6,000 6,650 111% 6,650 605.819.788.930 IGSA-ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING 3,843 4,249 5,000 5,000 100% 4,500 605.819.788.931 IGSA-PROPANE 12,321 10,961 9,000 9,000 100% 9,000 605.819.788.932 IGSA-UNIFORMS 5,501 5,598 5,000 6,350 127% 6,000 605.900.820.302 TRANSFER FROM DEBT SERVICE - - - - #DIV/0! - 605.999.900.901 GAIN/LOSS ON SALE OF ASSETS - - - - #DIV/0! - Total Revenue 5,565,584 5,680,199 5,180,550 5,538,016 107% 5,467,750 Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
605.601 - WWTP OPERATIONS
605.605.601.01 SALARIES
605.605.601.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 896,552 907,283 996,600 996,600 100% 964,800 605.605.601.01.103 OVERTIME 15,076 14,834 23,000 23,000 100% 23,575 605.605.601.01.108 SALARIES CASUAL - - - - #DIV/0! -
605.605.601.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 131,986 127,432 141,500 141,500 100% 141,800 605.605.601.01.110 OVERTIME-SPECIAL EVENT 1,027 - 900 900 100% - 605.605.601.01.111 STANDBY BASIC 14,639 14,669 17,600 17,600 100% 18,040 605.605.601.01.119 OT - STATE OF EMERGENCY COVID 19 - - - - #DIV/0! - Total Salaries 1,059,280 1,064,218 1,179,600 1,179,600 100% 1,148,215 605.605.601.02 BENEFITS .
605.605.601.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 84,683 87,766 92,800 92,800 100% 85,500 605.605.601.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 3,442 3,224 3,400 3,400 100% 3,400 605.605.601.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 27,502 42,475 67,786 67,786 100% 69,936 605.605.601.02.206 BENEFITS - DEFERRED COMP 2,509 2,166 2,000 2,000 100% 1,900 605.605.601.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 16,251 16,029 18,200 18,200 100% 17,600 605.605.601.02.210 BENEFITS - WORKERS COMP CLAIMS - 9,012 - - #DIV/0! - 605.605.601.02.211 BENEFITS-PARS - - - - #DIV/0! -
605.605.601.02.213 BILINGUAL SERVICES 330 1,101 1,200 1,200 100% - 605.605.601.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 9,249 9,334 11,600 11,600 100% 12,200 605.605.601.02.215 SICK LEAVE PAY OUT - - - - #DIV/0! - 605.605.601.02.216 VACATION / ANNUAL LV PAY OUT 15,964 45,581 20,000 - 0% - 605.605.601.02.220 RETIREE HEALTH - PEMCHA 4,955 4,619 4,500 3,900 87% 4,500 605.605.601.02.222 RETIREE HEALTH COMPENSATION 8,361 8,836 9,000 8,400 93% 10,000 605.605.601.02.225 GASB 68-PENSION EXPENSE 863,175 (337,774) - - #DIV/0! - 605.605.601.02.227 PENSION UNFUNDED LIABILITY 61,619 - 29,116 29,116 100% 39,597 Total Benefits 1,098,039 (107,633) 259,602 238,402 92% 244,633 Wastewater Reclamation - 601
CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
Wastewater Reclamation (WWTP)
TOTAL BUDGET - $
The Wastewater Reclamation Fund accounts for the operation of the wastewater system, which is a self-supporting activity which renders services on a user charge basis to residents and businesses located in the City. The wastewater system and plant are operated by the City and its employees. All revenue generated are used to offset the cost of running the wastewater facility and sewer infrastructure. 101

15.a
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Received 2025-26
605.605.601.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
605.605.601.03.301 TRAVEL/TRAINING EXPENSES 31,429 26,862 25,700 17,000 66% 26,300 605.605.601.03.305 DUES/SUBS/MEMBERSHIPS 7,478 6,711 7,690 4,700 61% 7,413 Total Employee Development 38,907 33,573 33,390 21,700 65% 33,713 605.605.601.04 COMMUNICATIONS
605.605.601.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 7,896 5,671 5,500 5,450 99% 5,500 Total Communications 7,896 5,671 5,500 5,450 99% 5,500
605.605.601.05 SUPPLIES
605.605.601.05.501 OFFICE SUPPLIES 3,972 3,505 3,800 - 0% - 605.605.601.05.502 COVID-19 SUPPLIES - - - - #DIV/0! -
605.605.601.05.510 POSTAGE 8,933 11,583 10,000 - 0% -
605.605.601.05.520 ADS/PUBLICATIONS 1,391 - - - #DIV/0! - 605.605.601.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 92,231 64,490 136,000 130,000 96% 142,000 605.605.601.05.526 COLLECTION-TECHNICAL SUPPLIES 10,714 24,638 60,000 50,000 83% 60,000 Total Supplies 117,241 104,216 209,800 180,000 86% 202,000 605.605.601.06 SERVICES
605.605.601.06.601 VEHICLE FUEL COST 13,579 10,249 15,000 - 0% - 605.605.601.06.608 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE COST 33,093 31,513 30,000 - 0% - 605.605.601.06.612 REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 187,558 163,541 260,000 260,000 100% 220,000 605.605.601.06.613 COLLECTIONS-REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 41,805 14,291 100,000 84,000 84% 105,000 605.605.601.06.620 RENTALS/LEASES 3,224 10,555 19,000 18,000 95% 13,000 605.605.601.06.626 PROF SERV. LEGAL 248 - 2,000 - 0% -
605.605.601.06.628 AUDIT EXPENSE 10,604 10,445 11,150 - 0% - 605.605.601.06.629 FEES/SERVICES (COLLECTIONS) 104,430 199,823 207,478 90,000 43% 216,000 605.605.601.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 479,656 344,806 498,398 475,000 95% 485,200 605.605.601.06.631 MERCHANT FEES 47,521 78,965 90,000 - 0% - 605.605.601.06.633 COVID-19 FEES/SERVICES - - - - #DIV/0! - 605.605.601.06.636 BURRTEC BILLING EXPENSES - - - - #DIV/0! - 605.605.601.06.644 IT COST ALLOCATION 190,202 205,539 233,800 - 0% 345,720 605.605.601.06.645 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 11,003 12,887 14,000 14,000 100% 14,000 605.605.601.06.650 MCLB SAMPLING CONTRACT - - - - #DIV/0! - Total Services 1,122,922 1,082,612 1,480,826 941,000 64% 1,398,920 605.605.601.07 TAXES/INSURANCE/MISCELLANEOUS
605.605.601.07.705 BAD DEBT EXPENSE (6,744) 34,954 10,000 - 0% - 605.605.601.07.711 INTEREST EXPENSE - - - - #DIV/0! -
605.605.601.07.712 GASB 87 - INTEREST EXPENSE 478 1,222 - - #DIV/0! - 605.605.601.07.716 ENERGY-SIEMENS INTEREST - - - - #DIV/0! - 605.605.601.07.717 ENERGY-SIEMENS PRINCIPAL - - - - #DIV/0! - 605.605.601.07.718 INTEREST-GF II LOAN $4 MILLION - - - - #DIV/0! - 605.605.601.07.720 INSURANCE, PROPERTY 37,909 54,466 64,074 - 0% 71,502 605.605.601.07.724 INSURANCE, LIABILITY 60,052 72,739 103,854 - 0% 135,209 605.605.601.07.731 GASB 87 - CAP-LEASE-ENTERPRISE PROG WW (16,704) (18,232) - - #DIV/0! - 605.605.601.07.733 CAP-LEASE-ENTERPRISE PROG WWTP 6,653 35,375 30,000 46,200 154% 34,600 605.605.601.07.735 DEPRECIATION 912,468 1,021,667 - - #DIV/0! - 605.605.601.07.736 GASB 87 - AMORTIZATION EXPENSE 16,078 17,655 - - #DIV/0! - 605.605.601.07.737 FRANCHISE CITY OF BARSTOW - - - - #DIV/0! - 605.605.601.07.738 FRANCHISE-MUNIS-CITY OF BARSTOW 196,844 207,491 200,000 - 0% 200,000 605.605.601.07.743 CUSTOMER REFUNDS 72 636 1,000 - 0% - Total Taxes/Insurance/Misc 1,207,106 1,427,973 408,928 46,200 11% 441,311 605.605.601.08 CAPITAL EQUIP/PROJECTS
605.605.601.08.803 COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE - - - - #DIV/0! - 605.605.601.08.809 VACTOR SEWER CLEANER - - - - #DIV/0! - 605.605.601.08.836 COMPUTER SERVER AND NETWORK - - - - #DIV/0! - 605.605.601.08.837 EQUIPMENT - 13,972 3,600 - 0% 3,600
605.605.601.08.867 TYLER ERP - - 8,000 - 0% 8,000
605.605.601.08.868 CCTV VAN - - 414,000 - 0% -
605.605.601.08.899 DR SERVER - - - - #DIV/0! -
Total Capital Equip/Projects - 13,972 425,600 - 0% 11,600 605.605.601.09 TRANSFERS/CONTINGENCY/CONTRAS
605.605.601.09.302 TRANSFERS TO DEBT SERVICE 93,114 93,348 93,220 93,220 100% 93,338 605.605.601.09.400 TRANSFER TO CIP FUND 2,404,176 235,151 425,110 - 0% 450,000 605.605.601.09.904 CAPITAL PROJ ASSET OFFSET (2,404,176) (224,050) - - #DIV/0! - 605.605.601.09.905 COST ALLOCATION 770,000 770,000 770,000 - 0% 770,000 Total Transfers/Contingency/Contras 863,114 874,449 1,288,330 93,220 7% 1,313,338 Wastewater Reclamation - 601
102

15.a
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Received 2025-26
605.605.601.14 ELECTRICITY
605.605.601.14.418 ELECTRICITY POND 3/4 - - - - #DIV/0! - 605.605.601.14.419 ELECTRICITY-MONTHLY 271,421 272,821 265,000 265,000 100% 265,000 605.605.601.14.420 ELECTRICITY POND 3 - - - - #DIV/0! - Total Electricity 271,421 272,821 265,000 265,000 100% 265,000 605.605.601.24 NATURAL GAS
605.605.601.24.440 GAS-2200 RIVERSIDE DR-PLANT 1,047 2,413 2,000 2,000 100% 2,000 Total Natural Gas 1,047 2,413 2,000 2,000 100% 2,000
605.605.601.34 WATER
605.605.601.34.463 WATER TRUCK FILL 4,117 4,755 5,000 5,150 103% 5,000 605.605.601.34.468 WATER 5,851 6,550 6,000 7,750 129% 7,500 Total Water 9,968 11,305 11,000 12,900 117% 12,500
605.602 - WW SOAPMINE RD. OPERATIONS
605.605.602.06 SERVICES
605.605.602.06.631 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING - - 12,000 6,781 57% 12,000 605.605.602.06.632 REMEDIATION PROJECT EXPENSES - - 25,000 5,000 20% 25,000 605.605.602.06.648 WATER-SOAPMINE RD AREA - - 14,000 14,000 100% 14,000 Total Services - - 51,000 25,781 51% 51,000
Total Expenditures 5,796,941 4,785,591 5,620,576 3,011,253 54% 5,129,730 ENDING FUND BALANCE 13,057,146 13,951,754 13,511,728 16,478,517 122.0% 16,816,537 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

General Manager Environmental Services 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wastewater Treatment Plant Superintendent 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lead Treatment Plant Operator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator in Training 4.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 Mechanic - Wastewater 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Assistant City Manager 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00
Information Technology Coordinator 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
Finance Director 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
Administrative Services Manager 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00
Administrative Analyst 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00
Accounting Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total FTE's: 13.85 12.85 12.50 12.50
Wastewater Reclamation - 601
103

15.a
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Received 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 835,296 1,259,266 2,016,901 2,016,901 2,587,963 650.514.110.410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 14,652 44,569 - - 0.0% - 650.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS/INVESTMENTS (8,378) 8,272 - - 0.0% - 650.708.150.803 HAULER REVENUE - 568,508 336,000 390,000 0.0% 400,000 650.708.150.804 LANDFILL FEES 323,811 359,389 310,000 230,000 74.2% 245,000 650.708.150.805 AB939 REVENUE 62,426 64,956 54,000 43,000 79.6% 44,000 650.708.150.807 FRANCHISE FEE REVENUE 52,936 56,676 48,000 40,000 83.3% 42,000 650.708.150.808 ADMINISTRATION FEE REVENUE 26,418 28,355 18,000 18,000 100.0% 18,000 650.708.150.809 TRASH PENALTY & INTEREST 1,290 18,013 7,500 7,000 93.3% 7,500 650.708.150.810 MUNIS - HAULER FEE 3,427,739 3,849,730 3,400,000 3,550,000 104.4% 3,500,000 650.708.150.811 MUNIS - LANDFILL FEES 989,291 981,304 985,000 985,000 100.0% 985,000 650.708.150.812 MUNIS - AB939 REVENUE 381,360 379,466 380,000 385,000 101.3% 385,000 650.708.150.813 MUNIS - FRANCHISE FEE REVENUE (1,210) (57) - - 0.0% - 650.708.150.814 MUNIS - ADMIN FEE REVENUE (604) (28) - - 0.0% - 650.708.150.815 MUNIS - TRASH PENALTY & INTEREST 124,949 123,024 116,000 122,000 105.2% 128,000 650.708.150.816 MUNIS - RETURN CHECK SERVICE CHARGE 400 275 100 200 200.0% 100 650.708.150.817 MUNIS - HAULER FEE / ORGANICS PROCESSING 225,417 303,246 217,000 180,000 82.9% 185,000 650.708.150.818 LIENS-TRASH DISPOSAL PENALTY & INTEREST 52,147 83,610 33,500 33,500 100.0% 33,500 650.708.150.819 MUNIS-COMMERCIAL FRANCHISE & ADMIN FEE 517,812 577,581 500,000 500,000 100.0% 500,000 650.805.785.910 LIEN/RELEASE/CO/PROP CHG FEES 7,921 7,691 1,200 1,900 158.3% 2,000 650.810.795.945 ENVIRONMENTAL MITGATION FUNDS 60,957 43,850 35,000 35,000 100.0% 35,000 650.819.778.638 WDA AMEND SAN BERNARDINO 48,028 46,545 35,000 35,000 100.0% 35,000 650.819.778.639 CWMP BOND REVENUE 8,875 27,185 48,500 48,500 100.0% 48,500 650.819.788.920 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 11,633 4,843 500 900 180.0% 1,000 650.819.788.923 CREDIT CARD CONVENIENCE FEES 233 - 100 50 50.0% 100 650.900.820.302 TRANSFER FROM DEBT SERVICE - - - - 0.0% - Total Revenue 6,328,103 7,577,003 6,525,400 6,605,050 101.2% 6,594,700 Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
650.650.650.01 SALARIES
650.650.650.01.101 SALARIES, REGULAR 226,281 232,575 287,800 287,800 100.0% 239,500 650.650.650.01.103 OVERTIME 2,561 3,559 4,000 4,000 100.0% 4,000 650.650.650.01.108 SALARIES CASUAL - - #DIV/0! -
650.650.650.01.109 INSURANCE OFFSET 21,954 23,343 28,100 28,100 100.0% 31,400 650.650.650.01.111 STANDBY BASIC 1,156 1,055 1,500 1,500 100.0% 1,500 650.650.650.01.119 OT - STATE OF EMERGENCY COVID 19 - #DIV/0! - Total Salaries 251,951 260,532 321,400 321,400 1 276,400 650.650.650.02 BENEFITS
650.650.650.02.201 BENEFITS - RETIREMENT 23,965 30,149 38,400 38,400 100.0% 20,700 650.650.650.02.202 BENEFITS - LIFE INSURANCE 697 695 900 900 100.0% 800 650.650.650.02.205 BENEFITS - WORKERS' COMP 3,083 8,539 13,628 13,628 100.0% 14,060 650.650.650.02.206 BENEFITS - DEFERRED COMP 1,246 1,462 2,000 2,000 100.0% 1,600 650.650.650.02.208 BENEFITS - MEDICARE 5,585 6,199 7,300 7,300 100.0% 6,000 650.650.650.02.213 BILINGUAL SERVICES 330 1,101 1,200 1,200 100.0% - 650.650.650.02.214 BENEFITS- STATE DISABILITY INS 2,166 2,362 3,300 3,300 100.0% 3,000 650.650.650.02.215 SICK LEAVE PAY OUT - - #DIV/0! -
650.650.650.02.216 LEAVE PAYOUTS 4,204 6,466 4,000 - 0.0% - 650.650.650.02.220 RETIREE HEALTH - PEMCHA 1,084 1,104 4,500 3,800 84.4% 4,500 650.650.650.02.222 RETIREE HEALTH COMPENSATION 6,304 5,361 6,500 6,800 104.6% 8,000 650.650.650.02.225 GASB 68-PENSION EXPENSE 227,831 (46,720) - - #DIV/0! - 650.650.650.02.227 PENSION UNFUNDED LIABILITY 14,655 - 29,184 29,184 100.0% 7,061 Total Benefits 291,149 16,718 110,912 106,512 1 65,721
650.650.650.03 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT
Solid Waste Disposal - 650
CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
Solid Waste Disposal Fund
TOTAL BUDGET - $
The Solid Waste Disposal Fund is used to account for the operation of the Solid Waste (trash) utility, a self-supporting activity which renders services on a user charge basis to residents and businesses located in the City. The components collected within the fee structure for solid waste include the hauler fee, AB939, landfill fee, administration, franchise fee, and organics processing. 104

15.a
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 650.650.650.03.301 TRAVEL / TRAINING EXPENSES 2,314 900 3,900 2,270 58.2% 2,200 Total Employee Development 2,314 900 3,900 2,270 1 2,200 650.650.650.04 COMMUNICATIONS
650.650.650.04.401 COMMUNICATIONS 1,136 1,131 1,000 1,225 122.5% 1,225 Total Communications 1,136 1,131 1,000 1,225 1 1,225
650.650.650.05 SUPPLIES
650.650.650.05.501 OFFICE/PRINTING/MISC SUPPLIES 534 714 1,500 1,406 93.7% 1,700 650.650.650.05.510 POSTAGE 8,933 11,583 10,000 7,422 74.2% 10,000 650.650.650.05.520 ADS/PUBLICATIONS 582 - - - #DIV/0! - 650.650.650.05.525 TECHNICAL SUPPLIES - - #DIV/0! -
Total Supplies 10,049 12,297 11,500 8,828 1 11,700
650.650.650.06 SERVICES
650.650.650.06.602 LIEN AMEND & RELEASE EXPENSES 140 654 5,000 1,498 30.0% 5,000 650.650.650.06.626 PROF LEGAL SERVICES - - 5,000 - 0.0% - 650.650.650.06.628 AUDIT EXPENSE 10,604 10,445 11,150 - 0.0% - 650.650.650.06.630 FEES/SERVICES 20,444 6,519 24,465 5,391 22.0% 10,730 650.650.650.06.631 MERCHANT FEES 46,963 78,734 95,000 - 0.0% - 650.650.650.06.632 ORGANICS COMPOSTING 82,064 116,160 105,000 12,000 11.4% 125,000 650.650.650.06.633 CO LANDFILL DISPOSAL 891,684 943,327 1,000,000 1,000,000 100.0% 1,000,000 650.650.650.06.634 AB 939 64,192 58,066 85,000 75,000 88.2% 90,000 650.650.650.06.635 4TH OF JULY CHARGES-AB939 - - #DIV/0! - 650.650.650.06.636 BURRTEC BILLING EXPENSES 1,523 1,540 - - #DIV/0! - 650.650.650.06.637 BURRTEC CONTRACT 3,427,739 4,416,426 4,100,000 4,113,000 100.3% 4,120,000 650.650.650.06.638 SUBSIDY HAULER 1,512 1,451 3,000 - 0.0% - 650.650.650.06.641 COMMUNITY OUTREACH / PUBLIC INFORMATION 4,778 4,788 5,000 4,800 96.0% 6,000 650.650.650.06.644 IT COST ALLOCATION 29,141 35,636 41,000 - 0.0% 41,700 Total Services 4,580,784 5,673,745 5,479,615 5,211,689 1 5,398,430 650.650.650.07 TAXES/INSURANCE/MISCELLANEOUS
650.650.650.07.705 BAD DEBT EXP & LOSS CLAIMS (5,889) 30,997 500 - 0.0% - 650.650.650.07.710 INTEREST EXPENSE - - #DIV/0! -
650.650.650.07.712 GASB 87 - INTEREST EXPENSE 44 218 - - #DIV/0! - 650.650.650.07.720 INSURANCE, PROPERTY - - #DIV/0! -
650.650.650.07.724 INSURANCE, LIABILITY 11,713 15,352 24,212 - 0.0% 25,507 650.650.650.07.731 GASB 87 - CAP-LEASE-ENTERPRISE PROG (653) (2,165) - - #DIV/0! - 650.650.650.07.733 CAP LEASE-ENTERPRISE PROG - 2,107 2,500 2,200 88.0% 2,200 650.650.650.07.735 DEPRECIATION 22,189 22,189 - - #DIV/0! - 650.650.650.07.736 GASB 87 - AMORTIZATION EXPENSE 572 2,076 - - #DIV/0! - 650.650.650.07.737 FRANCHISE CITY OF BARSTOW 52,936 55,164 15,000 35,000 233.3% 40,000 650.650.650.07.738 FRANCHISE-MUNIS-CITY OF BARSTOW 343,998 384,997 385,000 323,000 83.9% 380,000 650.650.650.07.743 CUSTOMER REFUNDS - 1,216 2,500 - 0.0% 2,500 Total Taxes/Insurance/Misc 424,910 512,152 429,712 360,200 1 450,207 650.650.650.08 CAPITAL EQUIP/PROJECTS
650.650.650.08.867 TYLER ERP - - 8,000 - 0.0% 8,000
Total Capital Equip/Projects - - 8,000 - - 8,000
650.650.650.09 TRANSFERS/CONTINGENCY/CONTRAS
650.650.650.09.302 TRANSFERS TO DEBT SERVICE 21,839 21,894 21,864 21,864 100.0% 21,892 650.650.650.09.905 COST ALLOCATION 320,000 320,000 320,000 - 0.0% 320,000 Total Transfers/Contingency/Contras 341,839 341,894 341,864 21,864 0 341,892 Total Expenditures 5,904,133 6,819,369 6,707,903 6,033,988 1 6,555,775 ENDING FUND BALANCE 1,259,266 2,016,901 1,834,398 2,587,963 1 2,626,888 Actual Actual Actual Proposed
Personnel Schedule 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Full Time:

General Manager Environmental Services 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 Assistant City Manager 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.00
Information Technology Coordinator 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20
Finance Director 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
Administrative Services Manager 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.00
Administrative Analyst 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accounting Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total FTE's: 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.30
105

15.a
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 106

15.a
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Dissolution Trust
TOTAL BUDGET - $0
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Account Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 2,326,327 2,310,557 2,315,039 2,315,039 2,319,339 801.514.110.410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 2,167 1,184 - 1,000 0.0% 1,000 801.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS/INVESTMENTS 4,082 241 - 250 0.0% 250 801.819.788.920 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 1,013 - - - 0.0% - 801.819.788.921 ROPS PAYMENTS 18,255 - - - 0.0% -
801.819.788.931 GOLDEN STATE WATER REVENUE 3,057 3,057 3,057 3,050 0.0% 3,050 Total Revenue 28,574 4,482 3,057 4,300 140.7% 4,300
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Account Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
801.800.800.06.635 BOND ADMN FEES & OTHER CHGS 1,450 - - - 0.0% - 801.800.800.07.710 INTEREST EXPENSE 6,385 - - - 0.0% -
801.800.800.09.999 TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS 36,510 - - - 0.0% - Total Expenditures 44,345 - - - 0.0% -
ENDING FUND BALANCE 2,310,557 2,315,039 2,318,096 2,319,339 100.1% 2,323,639 CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
The Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Dissolution Trust is an agency fund specific for managing the dissolution of the former RDA. On January 17, 2012, the City Council elected to become the successor agency to the RDA. The successor agency will continue until the obligations of the former RDA have been met, which will be in FY 2022-2023. Once all obligations are met, the successor agency will be dissolved.

Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Dissolution Trust - 801
107

15.a
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE (142) (220) (45) (45) -
805.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS/INVESTMENTS (78) 175 - 45 #DIV/0! 45 Total Revenue (78) 175 - 45 #DIV/0! 45
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
Total Expenditures - - - - 0.0% -
ENDING FUND BALANCE (220) (45) (45) - 0.0% 45
Trust & Agency - 805
CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
Trust & Agency
TOTAL BUDGET - $
108

15.a
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE (8) (15) (3) (3) 2
806.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS/INVESTMENTS (7) 12 - 5 #DIV/0! 5 Total Revenue (7) 12 - 5 #DIV/0! 5
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
Total Expenditures - - - - 0.0% -
ENDING FUND BALANCE (15) (3) (3) 2 -66.7% 7
Developer Deposits - 806
CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
Developer Deposits
TOTAL BUDGET - $ 0
109

15.a
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Revenue Classification Revenue Revenue Budget Revenue Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 441,633 447,483 463,775 463,775 469,775 901.100.100.100 OTHER HOUSING INCOME - - - - #DIV/0! -
901.100.100.105 LOW MOD OBLIGATION REPAY - - - - #DIV/0! - 901.514.110.410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 7,808 13,030 - 5,000 #DIV/0! 5,000 901.514.110.510 UNREALIZED GAIN/LOSS/INVESTMENTS (1,958) 3,262 - 1,000 #DIV/0! 1,000 901.900.199.999 TRANSFERS - - - - #DIV/0! -
Total Revenue 5,850 16,292 - 6,000 #DIV/0! 6,000
Actual Actual Amended Estimated % of Proposed
Expenditure Classification Expense Expense Budget Expense Budget Budget 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 Expended 2025-26
Total Expenditures - - - - 0.0% -
ENDING FUND BALANCE 447,483 463,775 463,775 469,775 101.3% 475,775 RDA Successor Agency Housing Fund - 901
CITY OF BARSTOW FY 2025-2026
RDA Successor Agency Housing Fund
TOTAL BUDGET - $
110

15.a
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD)

FINANCIAL POLICIES
REVENUES:

Recurring revenue growth (inflation) will be used to pay for recurring expenditures. Recurring expenditure increases should not be approved which exceed recurring revenue growth. Any new or expanded programs will be required to identify new funding sources and/or offsetting reductions in expenditures.

In addition:
• The City shall use a conservative approach in projecting revenues. • One-time revenues may be used for one-time expenditures. • The City shall update its user fees and charges periodically to recover costs or providing that service for which a fee is charged.

ACCOUNTING:

The City will comply with the requirements of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB and record and maintain its financial transactions based upon Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).

INVESTMENTS:

The City Treasurer shall invest the City’s idle funds in accordance with the guidelines established in the adopted Investment Policy.

DEBT:
• The City shall issue debt primarily to finance capital improvement projects or for the purchase of large fixed assets.
• The term of the debt should not exceed the life of the asset being financed. • The City shall issue debt using the most cost-effective method available at time of debt issuance. • The debt shall not cause the City to exceed its legal debt limit. 111

15.a
Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: FY 26 Proposed Budget (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD)

ATTACHMENT B
City Council/Fire Board
Joint Resolution
Adoption of FY 2025/2026
Proposed Operating &
Capital Improvement Budget

15.b
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Attachment B - FY 25-26 Joint Budget Reso (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) CC/BFPD Joint Resolution No. ______ - 2025 1
CC/BFPD JOINT RESOLUTION NO. ____-2025

A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

BARSTOW AND BARSTOW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD

ADOPTING THE ANNUAL OPERATING AND CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT BUDGETS FOR EACH AGENCY FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2025/2026
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Barstow and Barstow Fire Protection District Board has reviewed the Proposed Annual Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets for each agency as prepared and submitted by the City Manager of the City of Barstow for Fiscal Year 2025/2026; and A. The annual operating and capital improvement budget for the City of Barstow and the preliminary Barstow Fire Protection District Board for Fiscal Year 2025/2026, as prepared and submitted by the City Manager/Board Manager respectively, as modified, is hereby approved and adopted. The operating and capital improvement budget amounts are hereby authorized for the fiscal year within departments by fund, as listed within Attachment A for each respective agency.

B. From the effective date of said adoption of the budget, the total amount as stated therein for each department shall be appropriated subject to expenditure pursuant to all applicable ordinances of the City or Board and statues of the State. The operating budget may be reallocated by the City Manager/Board Manager providing there is no change in the total appropriation within any fund as authorized by the City Council and the Barstow Fire Protection District Board.

C. At the close of the fiscal year, unexpended appropriations in the operating budgets will be unencumbered as necessary to underwrite the expense of outstanding purchase commitments. Unexpended appropriations for authorized, but uncompleted projects in the capital budget as approved by the City Council and Barstow Fire Protection District Board may be carried forward to the next succeeding budget year upon approval by the City Manager/ Board Manager.

D. Total appropriations within each fund will be increased only by amendment of the budget by motion of the City Council and/or Barstow Fire Protection District Board.

E. The City Manager/Board Manager may reduce appropriations within funds as a method of fiscal control, and the Director of Finance may decrease revenue estimates to reflect economic change within the fiscal period.

15.b
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Attachment B - FY 25-26 Joint Budget Reso (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) CC/BFPD Joint Resolution No. ______ - 2025 2
F. The Director of Finance is hereby authorized to transfer monies in accordance with the interfund transfers listed in said budgets, and to transfer monies to cover operational expenditures of the City through transfers of funds in such amounts, and at such times during the fiscal year as may be determined necessary to the competent operation and control of City business, or to provide adequate cash flow, except that no such transfer shall be made in contravention of State law or City ordinances.

G. Adjustments made by the City Council and Barstow Fire Protection District Board during the budget hearing and documented in the minutes for this action will be incorporated with the final printed adopted budget documents respectively.

The City Manager/Board Manager is hereby authorized to approve any corrections in the budget document that are clerical in nature.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Barstow and Barstow Fire Protection District Board does hereby adopt the Annual Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 as presented herewith.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17th DAY OF JUNE, 2025.

Timothy R. Silva
Mayor/Chair, Board of Directors
ATTEST:

Andrea Flores
City Clerk/Board Secretary

15.b
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Attachment B - FY 25-26 Joint Budget Reso (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) CC/BFPD Joint Resolution No. ______ - 2025 3
I, Andrea Flores, City Clerk of the City of Barstow, Secretary of the Board of the Barstow Fire Protection District, and ex-officio Clerk of said agencies, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Joint Resolution No. ______-2025 of said City and District which was adopted at a regular meeting of said Council and Board held on the 17th day of JUNE, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
________________________________
Andrea Flores,
City Clerk and Secretary

15.b
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Attachment B - FY 25-26 Joint Budget Reso (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) Classification Salary Range
(Tier I) Monthly
Minimum
(Tier I)
Monthly
Maximum
(Tier I)
Monthly
Salary Range
(Tier II)
Minimum
(Tier II)
Monthly
Maximum
(Tier II)
Monthly
Public Services Assistant I 11120 $4,353.99 $5,556.92 11060 $4,101.66 $5,234.87 Environmental Services Assistant I 11120 $4,353.99 $5,556.92 11060 $4,101.66 $5,234.87 Wastewater Plant Operator In Training 11120 $4,353.99 $5,556.92 11060 $4,101.66 $5,234.87

Office Assistant 11170 $4,576.09 $5,840.38 11110 $4,310.88 $5,501.90 Kennel Technician 11170 $4,576.09 $4,576.09 11110 $4,310.88 $4,310.88 Recreation Program Assistant 11170 $4,576.09 $5,840.38 11110 $4,310.88 $5,501.90 Code Compliance Officer I 11220 $4,809.51 $6,138.29 11160 $4,530.78 $5,782.55 Animal Control Officer 11220 $4,809.51 $6,138.29 11160 $4,530.78 $5,782.55 Police Services Assistant 11220 $4,809.51 $6,138.29 11160 $4,530.78 $5,782.55 Public Services Assistant II 11220 $4,809.51 $6,138.29 11160 $4,530.78 $5,782.55 Environmental Services Assistant II 11220 $4,809.51 $6,138.29 11160 $4,530.78 $5,782.55 Senior Office Assistant 11220 $4,809.51 $6,138.29 11160 $4,530.78 $5,782.55 Mechanic in Training - WW 11220 $4,809.51 $6,138.29 11160 $4,530.78 $5,782.55 Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator 11220 $4,809.51 $6,138.29 11160 $4,530.78 $5,782.55 Police Officer Trainee 11290 $5,156.45 $6,581.09 11230 $4,857.61 $6,199.68 Code Compliance Officer II 11320 $5,312.70 $6,780.50 11260 $5,004.80 $6,387.54 Community Service Officer 11320 $5,312.70 $6,780.50 11260 $5,004.80 $6,387.54 Crime Scene Evidence Technician 11320 $5,312.70 $6,780.50 11260 $5,004.80 $6,387.54 Dispatcher 11320 $5,312.70 $6,780.50 11260 $5,004.80 $6,387.54 Information Technology Technician 11320 $5,312.70 $6,780.50 11260 $5,004.80 $6,387.54 Public Services Assistant III 11320 $5,312.70 $6,780.50 11260 $5,004.80 $6,387.54 Environmental Services Assistant III 11320 $5,312.70 $6,780.50 11260 $5,004.80 $6,387.54 Accounting Technician 11320 $5,312.70 $6,780.50 11260 $5,004.80 $6,387.54 Administrative Assistant 11320 $5,312.70 $6,780.50 11260 $5,004.80 $6,387.54 Senior Police Services Assistant 11320 $5,312.70 $6,780.50 11260 $5,004.80 $6,387.54 Senior Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator 11320 $5,312.70 $6,780.50 11260 $5,004.80 $6,387.54 Street Sweeper Operator 11320 $5,312.70 $6,780.50 11260 $5,004.80 $6,387.54 Code Compliance Officer III 11420 $5,868.52 $7,489.88 11360 $5,528.41 $7,055.81 Fire Inspector / Arson Investigator 11420 $5,868.52 $7,489.88 11360 $5,528.41 $7,055.81 Senior Administrative Assistant 11420 $5,868.52 $7,489.88 11360 $5,528.41 $7,055.81 Senior Accounting Technician 11420 $5,868.52 $7,489.88 11360 $5,528.41 $7,055.81 Engineering Technician / Inspector 11420 $5,868.52 $7,489.88 11360 $5,528.41 $7,055.81 Mechanic 11420 $5,868.52 $7,489.88 11360 $5,528.41 $7,055.81 Mechanic - Wastewater 11420 $5,868.52 $7,489.88 11360 $5,528.41 $7,055.81 Administrative Coordinator 11420 $5,868.52 $7,489.88 11360 $5,528.41 $7,055.81 Recreation Program Coordinator 11420 $5,868.52 $7,489.88 11360 $5,528.41 $7,055.81 Senior Dispatcher 11420 $5,868.52 $7,489.88 11360 $5,528.41 $7,055.81

Community Development Inspector I 11470 $6,167.88 $7,871.95 11410 $5,810.42 $7,415.73 Senior Code Compliance Officer 11470 $6,167.88 $7,871.95 11410 $5,810.42 $7,415.73 Senior Mechanic 11470 $6,167.88 $7,871.95 11410 $5,810.42 $7,415.73 Tier I Salary Range includes 6% premium for all full time employees with last hire date prior to July 1, 2010.

CITY OF BARSTOW
FY 2025-2026 / Full-Time
Employee Classification / Compensation Program
Effective July 1, 2025

15.c
Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Publicly Available Pay Schedule (PAPS) FY 2025-2026 (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) Classification Salary Range
(Tier I) Monthly
Minimum
(Tier I)
Monthly
Maximum
(Tier I)
Monthly
Salary Range
(Tier II)
Minimum
(Tier II)
Monthly
Maximum
(Tier II)
Monthly
Tier I Salary Range includes 6% premium for all full time employees with last hire date prior to July 1, 2010.

CITY OF BARSTOW
FY 2025-2026 / Full-Time
Employee Classification / Compensation Program
Effective July 1, 2025
Senior Mechanic - Wastewater 11470 $6,167.88 $7,871.95 11410 $5,810.42 $7,415.73 Executive Assistant 11520 $6,482.51 $8,273.50 11460 $6,106.82 $7,794.01 Senior Engineering Technician / Inspector 11520 $6,482.51 $8,273.50 11460 $6,106.82 $7,794.01 Senior Crime Scene Evidence Technician 11520 $6,482.51 $8,273.50 11460 $6,106.82 $7,794.01 Code Compliance Supervisor 11570 $6,813.18 $8,695.53 11510 $6,418.32 $8,191.58 Facilities Maintenance Supervisor 11570 $6,813.18 $8,695.53 11510 $6,418.32 $8,191.58 Parks & Open Space Supervisor 11570 $6,813.18 $8,695.53 11510 $6,418.32 $8,191.58 Field Services Supervisor 11570 $6,813.18 $8,695.53 11510 $6,418.32 $8,191.58 Community Development Inspector II 11570 $6,813.18 $8,695.53 11510 $6,418.32 $8,191.58 Lead Plant Operator 11570 $6,813.18 $8,695.53 11510 $6,418.32 $8,191.58 Recreation Activity Coordinator 11570 $6,813.18 $8,695.53 11510 $6,418.32 $8,191.58 Personnel Services Coordinator 11570 $6,813.18 $8,695.53 11510 $6,418.32 $8,191.58 Administrative Analyst 11600 $7,019.62 $8,959.02 11540 $6,612.80 $8,439.80 Police Officer 11600 $7,019.62 $8,959.02 11540 $6,612.80 $8,439.80

Senior Community Development Supervisor 11700 $7,754.02 $9,896.33 11640 $7,304.64 $9,322.79 Facilities Supervisor 11700 $7,754.02 $9,896.33 11640 $7,304.64 $9,322.79 Fleet Maintenance Supervisor 11700 $7,754.02 $9,896.33 11640 $7,304.64 $9,322.79 Information Technology Coordinator 11700 $7,754.02 $9,896.33 11640 $7,304.64 $9,322.79 Police Corporal 11700 $7,754.02 $9,896.33 11640 $7,304.64 $9,322.79 Police Detective 11700 $7,754.02 $9,896.33 11640 $7,304.64 $9,322.79 Police Services Supervisor 11700 $7,754.02 $9,896.33 11640 $7,304.64 $9,322.79 Project Coordinator - Field Inspection 11700 $7,754.02 $9,896.33 11640 $7,304.64 $9,322.79 Project Coordinator - Industrial Pretreatment 11700 $7,754.02 $9,896.33 11640 $7,304.64 $9,322.79 Project Coordinator - Office 11700 $7,754.02 $9,896.33 11640 $7,304.64 $9,322.79 Recreation Program Supervisor 11700 $7,754.02 $9,896.33 11640 $7,304.64 $9,322.79 Senior Administrative Analyst 11700 $7,754.02 $9,896.33 11640 $7,304.64 $9,322.79 Senior Community Development Inspector 11700 $7,754.02 $9,896.33 11640 $7,304.64 $9,322.79 Wastewater Treatment Plant Supervisor 11700 $7,754.02 $9,896.33 11640 $7,304.64 $9,322.79 Economic Development Administrator 11750 $8,149.56 $10,401.12 11690 $7,677.25 $9,798.33 Public Works Administrator 11750 $8,149.56 $10,401.12 11690 $7,677.25 $9,798.33 Transportation Services Administrator 11750 $8,149.56 $10,401.12 11690 $7,677.25 $9,798.33 Engineering Services Administrator 11750 $8,149.56 $10,401.12 11690 $7,677.25 $9,798.33 Environmental Services Administrator 11750 $8,149.56 $10,401.12 11690 $7,677.25 $9,798.33 Public Information Officer 11750 $8,149.56 $10,401.12 11690 $7,677.25 $9,798.33 Accountant 11750 $8,149.56 $10,401.12 11690 $7,677.25 $9,798.33 Planning & Community Development Administrator 11750 $8,149.56 $10,401.12 11690 $7,677.25 $9,798.33 Planning & Environmental Services Administrator 11750 $8,149.56 $10,401.12 11690 $7,677.25 $9,798.33 Animal Service Manager 11810 $8,650.92 $11,041.00 11750 $8,149.56 $10,401.12 Industrial Pretreatment Superintendent 11850 $9,002.19 $11,489.32 11790 $8,480.47 $10,823.46 Economic Development Specialist 11850 $9,002.19 $11,489.32 11790 $8,480.47 $10,823.46

15.c
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Publicly Available Pay Schedule (PAPS) FY 2025-2026 (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) Classification Salary Range
(Tier I) Monthly
Minimum
(Tier I)
Monthly
Maximum
(Tier I)
Monthly
Salary Range
(Tier II)
Minimum
(Tier II)
Monthly
Maximum
(Tier II)
Monthly
Tier I Salary Range includes 6% premium for all full time employees with last hire date prior to July 1, 2010.

CITY OF BARSTOW
FY 2025-2026 / Full-Time
Employee Classification / Compensation Program
Effective July 1, 2025
IT Superintendent 11850 $9,002.19 $11,489.32 11790 $8,480.47 $10,823.46 Public Works Superintendent 11850 $9,002.19 $11,489.32 11790 $8,480.47 $10,823.46 Wastewater Treatment Plant Superintendent 11850 $9,002.19 $11,489.32 11790 $8,480.47 $10,823.46 Senior Accountant 11850 $9,002.19 $11,489.32 11790 $8,480.47 $10,823.46 Parks & Recreation Superintendent 11850 $9,002.19 $11,489.32 11790 $8,480.47 $10,823.46 Principal Accountant 11890 $9,367.71 $11,955.84 11830 $8,824.81 $11,262.94 Human Resources Manager 11920 $9,651.56 $12,318.11 11860 $9,092.21 $11,604.22 Information Technology Manager 11920 $9,651.56 $12,318.11 11860 $9,092.21 $11,604.22 Police Sergeant 11920 $9,651.56 $12,318.11 11860 $9,092.21 $11,604.22 Administrative Services Manager 12020 $10,661.32 $13,606.85 11960 $10,043.45 $12,818.27 Community Development Manager 12020 $10,661.32 $13,606.85 11960 $10,043.45 $12,818.27 Assistant Finance Director 12020 $10,661.32 $13,606.85 11960 $10,043.45 $12,818.27 Public Works Manager 12020 $10,661.32 $13,606.85 11960 $10,043.45 $12,818.27 Chief Waste Water Plant Operator 12020 $10,661.32 $13,606.85 11960 $10,043.45 $12,818.27 City Clerk Services Manager 12020 $10,661.32 $13,606.85 11960 $10,043.45 $12,818.27 City Planner 12020 $10,661.32 $13,606.85 11960 $10,043.45 $12,818.27 Economic Development Manager 12020 $10,661.32 $13,606.85 11960 $10,043.45 $12,818.27

Police Lieutenant 12090 $11,430.39 $14,588.39 12030 $10,767.94 $13,742.92 City Engineer 12170 $12,377.47 $15,797.14 12110 $11,660.14 $14,881.62 City Building Official/Fire Marshal 12170 $12,377.47 $15,797.14 12110 $11,660.14 $14,881.62 Assistant to the City Manager 12170 $12,377.47 $15,797.14 12110 $11,660.14 $14,881.62 General Manager Enviro SVCS 12170 $12,377.47 $15,797.14 12110 $11,660.14 $14,881.62 Economic Development & Planning Manager 12170 $12,377.47 $15,797.14 12110 $11,660.14 $14,881.62 Police Captain 12170 $12,377.47 $15,797.14 12110 $11,660.14 $14,881.62 Finance Director 12380 $15,253.90 $19,468.27 12320 $14,369.86 $18,339.99 Community Development Director 12380 $15,253.90 $19,468.27 12320 $14,369.86 $18,339.99 Administrative Services Director 12380 $15,253.90 $19,468.27 12320 $14,369.86 $18,339.99 Economic Development Director 12380 $15,253.90 $19,468.27 12320 $14,369.86 $18,339.99 Police Chief 12380 $15,253.90 $19,468.27 12320 $14,369.86 $18,339.99 Assistant City Manager 12400 $15,560.49 $19,859.58 12340 $14,658.69 $18,708.62

15.c
Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Publicly Available Pay Schedule (PAPS) FY 2025-2026 (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) Classification Salary Range Mininum
Monthly
Maximum
Monthly
City Manager 001 $22,833.33 $22,833.33
*Salary ranges are determined by negotiated contracts.

Classification Salary Range Minimum
Hourly
Maximum
Hourly
PT-RecLeader/Lifeguard (&) 10460 $13.03 $16.62
PT-Rec Leader 10460 $13.03 $16.62
PT-Maintenance Worker I 10460 $13.03 $16.62
PT-RecLeader/Senior Lifeguard (&) 10580 $14.68 $18.74
PT-Senior RecLeader 10580 $14.68 $18.74
PT-Pool Manager 10800 $18.27 $23.32
& PT Rec Leader/Lifeguard and PT-Rec Leader/Senior Lifeguard positions shall receive an additional $2.50 per hour for ony those hours worked in the capacity as a certified lifeguard. Employees must attain and maintain required lifeguard certifications throughout the course of their employment.

FY 2025-2026 / Part-Time - Casual
Employee Classification / Compensation Program
Effective July 1, 2025

CITY OF BARSTOW - CONTRACT EMPLOYEES
FY 2025-2026 / Contract
Employee Classification / Compensation Program
Effective July 1, 2025

CITY OF BARSTOW

15.c
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Publicly Available Pay Schedule (PAPS) FY 2025-2026 (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) Classification Salary Range Minimum
Monthly
Maximum
Monthly
Firefighter Trainee 11230 $4,857.61 $6,199.68
Firefighter / EMT 11480 $6,229.56 $7,950.67
Firefighter / Paramedic 11480 $6,229.56 $7,950.67
Fire Engineer 11580 $6,881.31 $8,782.48
Fire Captain 11800 $8,565.28 $10,931.70
Fire Battalion Chief 11880 $9,274.96 $11,837.46
Assistant Fire Chief 11890 $9,367.72 $11,955.84
Fire Division Chief 12050 $10,984.38 $14,019.15
Fire Chief 12320 $14,369.86 $18,339.99
Classification Salary Range Min. Max.

Paid Call Firefigher 10460 $13.03 $16.62
FY 2025-2026
Employee Classification / Compensation Program
Effective July 1, 2025

BARSTOW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
FY 2025-2026 / Full-Time
Employee Classification / Compensation Program
Effective July 1, 2025

BARSTOW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

15.c
Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Publicly Available Pay Schedule (PAPS) FY 2025-2026 (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) RESOLUTION NO. -2025

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BARSTOW, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025/2026 PUBLICLY AVAILABLE PAY SCHEDULE TO COMPLY WITH CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM (CALPERS) STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS PERTAINING TO

PUBLICLY AVAILABLE PAY SCHEDULES
WHEREAS, all employers who contract with the California Public Employee’s Retirement System (CalPERS) must comply with the publicly available pay schedule provisions contained within California Code of Regulations (CCR) 57035; and WHEREAS, it is necessary for the City Council to review and duly approve and adopt, in accordance with requirements of applicable public meetings laws, a publicly available pay schedule; and
WHEREAS, attached to this resolution and incorporated by reference is the City of Barstow’s publicly available pay schedule which will be made publicly available on the City’s website and made available upon request; and
WHEREAS, this resolution confirms and formally adopts the publicly available salary schedule which is effective as of July 1, 2025; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Barstow hereby:

1. Approves and confirms the publicly available pay schedule (Attachment A) to comply with the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) statuary and regulatory requirements for publicly available pay schedules.

Timothy R. Silva, Mayor
ATTEST:

Andrea Flores, City Clerk

15.d
Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Resolution PAPS FY 25-26 (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) I, Andrea Flores, City Clerk of the City of Barstow, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. -2025 is the actual Resolution duly and regularly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting on the 17th day of June, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Andrea Flores, City Clerk

15.d
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Resolution PAPS FY 25-26 (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD)

ATTACHMENT A
FY25/26
Publicly Available Pay Schedule (PAPS)

15.d
Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Resolution PAPS FY 25-26 (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD)

CITY OF BARSTOW

INVESTMENT POLICY
June 17, 2025

15.e
Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 1 STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY
FY 2025-26
I. GENERAL INTRODUCTION
Under the laws of the State of California, it is the responsibility of the City Treasurer, at the direction of the City Council, to secure and protect the public funds of the City, and to establish proper safeguards, controls, and procedures to maintain these funds in a lawful, rational and auspicious manner. Said maintenance shall include the prudent and secure investment of those funds that are deemed temporarily excess, in a manner anticipated to provide additional benefit to the people of the City of Barstow.

This Statement of Investment Policy will be provided annually for the review and approval of the City Council in an open public meeting. It will be provided to securities dealers, banks, and brokers currently approved for conducting investment transactions with the City Treasurer’s office in the ongoing effort to manage the excess cash portfolio; to other affected persons or entities; and to any member of the electorate wishing to review this document upon request. The Treasurer reserves the right to provide these documents on a cost basis.

II. SCOPE
This Statement of Investment Policy pertains to those temporarily surplus funds under the control of the Treasurer, designated for the daily ongoing operations of the City; and concerns the deposit, maintenance, safekeeping, and preservation of all such funds, and the investments made with these funds. This Policy does not apply to pension trust funds, deferred compensation funds, and certain other trust or non-operating funds.

III. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Statement of Investment Policy is to provide the City Council, and those involved in servicing the investment requirements of the City, and any other interested party, a clear understanding of the regulations and internal guidelines that will be observed in maintaining and investing those pooled funds deemed temporarily excess. This statement is intended to provide guidelines for the prudent investment of the City's temporary idle cash, and outline the procedures for maximizing the efficiency of the City's cash management system. The ultimate goal is to enhance the economic status of the City while safeguarding its assets.

IV. OBJECTIVE
The City's cash management system is designed to accurately monitor and forecast revenues and expenditures, thus enabling the City to invest funds to the fullest extent possible. The City attempts to obtain the highest yield possible only after the criteria established for safety and liquidity have been met. The City of Barstow operates its pooled idle cash investments with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for

15.e
Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 2 investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived.

This affords the City a broad spectrum of investment opportunities as long as the investment is deemed prudent and is allowable under current legislation of the State of California Government Code Section 53600 et seq. and the general laws of the City of Barstow. Further, the City Treasurer shall comply with all laws governing the deposit and securing of public funds and the handling of trust funds in his or her possession. In addition, if the City has issued bonds, the Treasurer shall use a system of accounting and auditing that adheres to generally accepted accounting principles.

The City of Barstow strives to maintain the level of investment of all idle funds as near 100% as possible, through daily and projected cash flow determinations. Idle cash management and investment transactions are the responsibility of the Treasurer or his/her designee.

Criteria for selecting investments and the order of priority are:

1. Safety: The safety and risk associated with an investment refers to the potential loss of principal, interest, or a combination of these amounts. The City only operates in those investments that are considered very safe.

2. Liquidity: This refers to the ability to "cash in" at any moment in time with a minimal chance of losing some portion of principal or interest.

3. Yield: Yield is the potential dollar earnings an investment can provide, and sometimes is referred to as the rate of return.

4. Safekeeping: Securities purchased shall be held in third party safekeeping in the Trust Department of a financial institution, in the City's name and control. The account established shall be protected from seizure by creditors should the financial institution holding the City's securities file for bankruptcy protection. The basic premise underlying the City's investment philosophy is and continues to be, to insure that surplus funds are always safe and available when needed.

V. DELEGATION OF INVESTMENT AUTHORITY
Authority to manage the City of Barstow's investment program is derived from City of Barstow Council Resolution No. ______-2025 Management responsibility for the investment program is hereby delegated for Fiscal Year 2025-26 to the City Treasurer or his/her designee, who shall establish written procedures for the operation of the investment program consistent with this Investment Policy. Procedures should include references to: safekeeping, repurchase agreements, wire transfer agreements, banking service contracts, and collateral/ depository agreements. Such procedures shall include explicit delegation of authority to persons responsible for investment transactions. No person may engage in an investment transaction except as provided under the terms of this policy and the procedures established by the City Treasurer or his/her designee. The City Treasurer or his/ her designee shall be responsible for all transactions undertaken and shall establish a system of controls to regulate the activities of subordinate officials.

15.e
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 3 VI. STANDARD OF PRUDENCE
The Treasurer shall perform the investment function in conjunction with the “Prudent Man Rule.” This rule states, in principle that whenever investing property for the benefit of others, a trustee shall exercise the judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing that persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence, would exercise in the management of their own affairs not in regard to speculation, but in regard to the permanent disposition of their funds, considering the probability of safety of, as well as the probable income from their capital. The Treasurer and his designees are considered to have a fiduciary, trustee, relationship with the public for the public funds and all investment decisions will be made in a manner sustaining this responsibility.

VII. AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS
The California Government Code allows the City to invest in the following media:

Securities of the U.S. Government, or its government sponsored agencies Small Business Administration loans
Certificates of deposit, placed with commercial banks and savings and loan companies Negotiable certificates of deposit
Bankers’ acceptances
Commercial paper
Corporate notes and bonds, including medium term notes
State of California Local Agency Investment Fund
Repurchase agreements
Reverse repurchase agreements
Passbook savings account demand deposits
County Treasurer demand deposits
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities
Money market mutual funds
As a matter of practice, however, the City of Barstow generally limits its investments to the following vehicles:

U.S. Treasury Bills - Issued weekly with maturity dates up to one year. They are issued and traded on a discount basis with interest figured on a 360-day basis, actual number of days. They are issued in amounts of $10,000 and up, in multiples of $5,000. They are a highly liquid security.

15.e
Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 4 U.S. Treasury Notes - Initially issued with two- to ten-year maturities. They are actively traded in a large secondary market and are very liquid. The Treasury may issue Note issues with a minimum of $1,000; however, the average minimum is $5,000.

Agency/Government Sponsored Enterprise Issues - Guaranteed directly or indirectly by the United States Government. All agency/GSE obligations qualify as legal investments and are acceptable as security for public deposits.

These securities usually provide higher yields than U.S. Treasury securities with generally all of the same advantages in terms of safety and liquidity. Examples include:

FICBs (Federal Intermediate Credit Bank Debentures) - Loans to lending institutions used to finance the short-term and intermediate needs of farmers, such as seasonal production. These securities are usually issued monthly in minimum denominations of $3,000 with a nine-month maturity. Interest is payable at maturity and is calculated on a 360-day, 30-day month basis.

FFCBs (Federal Farm Credit Bank) - Debt instruments used to finance the short and intermediate term needs of farmers and the national agricultural industry. They are issued monthly with threeand six-month maturities. The FFCB issues larger issues (one to ten year) on a periodic basis.

These issues are highly liquid.

FLBs (Federal Land Bank Bonds) - Long-term mortgage credit provided to farmers by Federal Land Banks. These bonds are issued at irregular times for various maturities ranging from a few months to ten years. The minimum denomination is $1,000. They carry semi-annual coupons.

Interest is calculated on a 360-day, 30-day month basis.

FHLBs (Federal Home Loan Bank Notes and Bonds) - Issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank System to help finance the housing industry. The notes and bonds provide liquidity and home mortgage credit to savings and loan associations, mutual savings banks, cooperative banks, insurance companies, and mortgage-lending institutions. They are issued irregularly for various maturities. The minimum denomination is $5,000. The notes are issued with maturities of less than one year and interest is paid at maturity. The bonds are issued with various maturities and carry semi-annual coupons. Interest is calculated on a 360-day, 30-day month basis.

FNMAs (Federal National Mortgage Association) - Used to assist the home mortgage market by purchasing mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration and the Farmers Home Administration, as well as those guaranteed by the Veterans Administration. They are issued about four times a year for maturities ranging from a few months to eight years. They are issued in minimum denominations of $10,000. They carry semi-annual coupons. Interest is computed on a 360-day, 30-day month basis.

FHLMCs (Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation) - A government-sponsored enterprise established to develop the secondary market for conventional home mortgages. Mortgages are purchased solely from the Federal Home Loan Bank System member lending institutions whose deposits are insured by agencies of the United States Government. They are issued for various maturities and in minimum denominations of $10,000. Interest is paid semi-annually and is calculated on a 360-day, 30-day month basis.

Other federal agency issues are Small Business Administration notes (SBAs), Government National Mortgage Association notes (GNMAs), and Tennessee Valley Authority notes (TVAs).

15.e
Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 5 As a matter of practice, the City does not invest in these issues as they do not suit our purposes as well as other investment opportunities available.

The City limits its investments to no more than 60% of its surplus funds in any one Federal Agency.

Bankers’ Acceptances - Short-term credit arrangements to enable businesses to obtain funds to finance commercial transactions. They are time drafts drawn on a bank by an exporter or importer to obtain funds to pay for specific merchandise. By its acceptance, the bank becomes primarily liable for the payment of the draft at its maturity. An acceptance is a high-grade negotiable instrument. Bankers Acceptances can be purchased in various denominations for 30, 60, or 90 days, but no longer than -180 days. The interest is calculated on a 360-day discount basis similar to Treasury Bills. Local agencies may not invest more than 40% of their surplus funds in bankers’ acceptances or more than 10% of the agency’s surplus funds in bankers’ acceptances of any one commercial bank.

Certificates of Deposit - Time deposits of a bank or savings and loan. They are purchased in various denominations with maturities ranging from 30 to 360 days. The interest is calculated on a 360-day, actual-day month basis and is payable monthly.

Negotiable Certificates of Deposit - Unsecured obligations of the financial institution, bank or savings and loan, bought at par value with the promise to pay face value plus accrued interest at maturity. They are high-grade negotiable instruments, paying a higher interest rate than regular certificates of deposit. The primary market issuance is in multiples of $1,000,000; the secondary market usually trades in denominations of $500,000, although smaller lots are occasionally available. As a matter of practice, only the ten largest U.S. banks where there is a secondary market established for continued liquidity are considered for investment. The City’s total investment in negotiable certificates of deposit may not exceed 30% of surplus funds.

Commercial Paper - Short-term unsecured promissory notes issued by a corporation to raise working capital. These negotiable instruments are purchased at a discount to par value or at par value with interest bearing.

The City is permitted by State law to invest in commercial paper of "prime" quality of the highest ranking or of the highest letter and numerical rating as provided for by a nationally recognized statistical-rating organization (NRSRO).

Eligible paper is further limited to issuing corporations that are organized and operating within the United States and having total assets in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000) and having an “A” or higher rating for the issuer’s debt other than commercial paper as rated by an NRSRO. Commercial Paper issued by an Issuer that has a rating of “A” on their debt other than commercial paper but are on credit watch for a possible downgrade by an NRSRO shall not be considered for investment purposes.

Purchases of eligible commercial paper may not exceed 270 days maturity nor represent more than 10% of the outstanding paper of an issuing corporation. Purchases of commercial paper may not exceed 25 percent of the portfolio.

Medium Term Corporate Notes - Unsecured promissory notes issued by a corporation organized and operating in the United States. These are negotiable instruments and are traded in the

15.e
Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 6 secondary market. Medium term corporate notes can be defined as extended maturity commercial paper.

Local agencies are restricted by the Government Code to investments in corporations rated in the top three note categories by Moody's Investors Service, Inc., and/or Standard and Poor's Corporation. For medium-term notes, eligible purchases consist of instruments that have a rating of "A" or better by both Moody's Investors Service, Inc., and Standard and Poor's Corporation.

Corporate Notes issued by an issuer that has a rating of “A” but are on credit watch for a possible downgrade by a nationally recognized rating agency shall not be considered for investment purposes. If the security's credit rating falls below an "A" rating by one of these agencies, then awareness is heightened and the security monitored closely to determine if credit risk has been significantly increased. If a security falls below an "A" rating by both rating agencies, then the City Treasurer and his/her designee will evaluate the need to sell the security prior to maturity. Further restrictions on the purchase of medium term corporate notes are a maximum term of five years to maturity and total investments in medium term corporate notes may not exceed 30% of the local agency's surplus funds or 5% in any one issuer name.

Repurchase Agreements - A repurchase agreement is a short-term investment transaction. Banks buy temporarily idle funds from a customer by selling U.S. Government or other securities with a contractual agreement to repurchase the same securities on a future date. Repurchase agreements are typically for one to ten days in maturity. The customer receives interest from the bank. The interest rate reflects both the prevailing demand for Federal funds and the maturity of the repurchase agreement. Some banks will execute repurchase agreements for a minimum of $100,000 to $500,000, but most banks have a minimum of $1,000,000. The term of a repurchase agreement may not exceed one year. The market value of securities that underlay a repurchase agreement shall be valued at 102 percent or greater of the funds borrowed against those securities and the value shall be adjusted no less than quarterly. Repurchase Agreements can only be executed with financial institutions or broker/dealers that have signed a Master Repurchase Agreement with the City.

Reverse Repurchase Agreements - A reverse repurchase agreement is the opposite of a repurchase agreement. The City loans a security to a bank in exchange for cash. The City agrees to pay off the loan with interest on a future date. As this type of investment actually involves a loan arrangement, the City may not invest more than 10% of its surplus funds in reverse repurchase agreements, and must always match its maturities to the reinvestment. Reverse repurchase agreements may be utilized only when either of the following conditions are met:

1. The security was owned or specifically committed to purchase, by the local agency, prior to December 31, 1994, and was sold using a reverse repurchase agreement on December 31, 1994.

2. The security:
a) to be sold has been owned and fully paid for a minimum of 30 days prior to sale; and
b) total of all reverse repurchase agreements owned does not exceed 10 percent of the base value of the portfolio; and
c) agreement does not exceed a term of 92 days, unless the agreement includes a written codicil guaranteeing a minimum earning or spread for the entire period between the sale of a security using a reverse repurchase agreement and the final maturity date of the same security.

LAIF (Local Agency Investment Fund) - A special fund in the State Treasury which local agencies may use to deposit funds for investment. There is no minimum investment period and the

15.e
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 7 minimum transaction is $5,000, in multiples of $1,000 above that, with a maximum balance of $40,000,000 for any agency. The City is restricted to a maximum of fifteen transactions per month.

It offers high liquidity because deposits can be converted to cash in 24 hours and no interest is lost. All interest is distributed to those agencies participating on a proportionate share basis determined by the amounts deposited and the length of time they are deposited. Interest is paid quarterly. The State retains an amount for reasonable costs of making the investments, not to exceed one-quarter of one percent of the earnings. California Government Code §16429.3 states, in part:
"money placed with the State Treasurer for deposit in the Local Agency Investment Fund by cities, counties, or special districts shall not be subject to impoundment or seizure by any state official or state agency."
Money Market Mutual Funds - Shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management companies. To be eligible for investment, shares must:

1. attain the highest rating provided by Moody's Investors Service, Inc., which is currently "Aaa," and/or Standard and Poor's Corporation, which is currently "AAA;" and,

2. the investment adviser managing the shares must be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five years’ experience investing in instruments authorized under California Government Code §53601subdivisions (a) to (m) inclusive, and with assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000); and,

3. the purchase price of shares shall not include any commission that these companies may charge; and,

4. investment in shares shall not exceed 20 percent of surplus funds.

However, no more than 10 percent of the City’s surplus funds may be invested in shares of beneficial interest of any one mutual fund. Furthermore, any investment in a money market mutual fund must comply with other self-imposed restrictions as specified in this Investment Policy.

Asset-Backed and Mortgage-Backed Security - Bonds backed by payments from receivables/mortgages having a maximum of five years maturity. These securities must have an "AA" or better rating by Moody's Investors Services, Inc., and/or Standard and Poor's Corporation.

No more than 20% of the City's surplus money may be invested in these securities.

VIII. INVESTMENT OF BOND PROCEEDS
When investing proceeds from the issuance of bonds, the City of Barstow will follow this Investment Policy when determining allowable investments. Should the trust agreement of a particular bond issue be more restrictive than the City's policy on permitted investments, then the trust agreement will take precedence.

IX. CITY CONSTRAINTS
The City Treasurer or his/her designee will evaluate local banks and savings institutions and may invest idle cash funds with such institutions when the criteria for prudent investment previously stated are met. The City operates its investment pool according to State and self-imposed constraints. It does not buy stocks; it does not speculate; it does not deal in futures or options.

Any investment extending beyond a five-year period requires prior City Council approval.

Additionally, a minimum of 20% of the outstanding investments must mature within a one-year period.

15.e
Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 8 X. SAFEKEEPING AND COLLATERALIZATION
All security transactions, including collateral for repurchase agreements, entered into by the City shall be conducted on a delivery-versus-payment (DVP) basis. Securities will be held by a third party custodian designated by the City Treasurer or his/her designee.

Collateralization will be required on two types of investments: certificates of deposit and repurchase (and reverse repurchase) agreements. In order to anticipate market changes and provide a level of security for all funds, a minimum collateralization level is required.

Surplus funds must be deposited in State or national banks, State or Federal savings and loan associations, or State or Federal credit unions within the State of California. The deposits cannot exceed the amount of the bank's or savings and loan's paid-up capital and surplus.

The bank or savings and loan must secure public funds deposits with eligible securities having a market value of 110% of the total amount of the deposits. State law also allows as an eligible security, first trust deeds having a value of 150% of the total amount of the deposits. A third class of collateral is 105% in the form of a letter of credit drawn on the Federal Home Loan Bank.

The City Treasurer or his/her designee may waive security for that portion of a deposit, which is insured pursuant to Federal law. Currently, the first $100,000 of a deposit is federally insured.

Deposits in excess of $100,000 are collateralized as previously indicated.

XI. DERIVATIVE INVESTMENTS
A derivative is a generic term often used to categorize a wide variety of financial instruments whose value "depends on" or is "derived from" the value of an underlying asset, reference rate, or index.

Investments in derivative instruments are limited to debt securities that have periodic increases, or step-up interest rate adjustments that provide upward mobility in yield return. Investments in debt securities, which contain a callable feature are also allowable, but must comply with other restrictions as specified in this Investment Policy.

Investments purchased after June 19, 1995, in derivative instruments known as "inverse floaters," "dual index," or "stepped inverse" securities that produce higher than market yields at purchase date (when interest rates are low), but have the possibility of producing low or no coupon rates as market interest rates rise through the life of the instrument are not allowable. Furthermore, investments in range notes or interest-only strips that are derived from a pool of mortgages are not allowable. However, debt securities that have a floor or a built-in feature that prevents the instrument from potentially returning no yield are allowable.

XII. POLICY COMPLIANCE REGULATIONS
Should the portfolio, for any reason, fall out of compliance with this Investment Policy, immediate liquidation of securities in order to bring the portfolio back into compliance is not required.

However, the Treasurer must take action to bring the portfolio into compliance within 12 months from the date the portfolio was determined to be in non-compliance with the provisions of this Investment Policy. Additionally, adequate disclosure as to all instances of noncompliance, and the efforts undertaken to bring the portfolio into compliance, must be made on the monthly Treasurer’s Report.

15.e
Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 9 XIII. REPORTING
Under provisions of Section 53646 of the California Government Code, the Treasurer or his/her designee shall render a quarterly investment report to the City Council, the City Manager, and the City Attorney within 30 days following the end of the quarter covered by the report. However, as a matter of practice, a monthly report shall be submitted listing the type of investments, institution, date of maturity, par value, amount of deposit, rate of interest, current market value for all securities, and such other data as may be required by the City Council on a monthly basis.

XIV. QUALIFIED DEALERS
The City of Barstow shall transact business only with banks, savings and loans, and registered investment securities dealers. The City will limit the number of broker/dealers authorized to do business with the City to no more than one (1) broker/dealer for every $10,000,000 of portfolio size. Each authorized broker/dealer shall be required to annually file a signed certification with the City Treasurer certifying that they have read and understand the City’s most recently adopted investment policy.

The City Treasurer or his/her designee will maintain a list of financial institutions authorized to provide investment services. In addition, a list will also be maintained of approved broker/dealers who are authorized to provide investment services in the State of California. These may include "primary" and "regional" broker/dealers with offices located in the State of California. All financial institutions and broker/dealers who desire to become qualified bidders for investment transactions must be approved by and supply the City Treasurer or his/her designee with a completed broker/dealer questionnaire.

XV. POLICY REVIEW
This Statement of Investment Policy shall be reviewed at least annually to ensure its consistency with the overall objectives of preservation of principal, liquidity and return, and its relevance to current law, financial and economic trends. Should conditions change or legislation become effective that behooves subsequent changes or a liberalization of terms within the policy during the next fiscal year, the revised policy will be submitted to Council for adoption of the recommended action.

15.e
Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 10 CITY OF BARSTOW

INVESTMENT GUIDELINES AND STRATEGY
I. Guidelines - Guidelines are established to direct and control activities in such a manner that previously established goals are achieved.

II. Investment Transaction - Every investment transaction must be authorized and reviewed by the Treasurer or his/her designee.

III. Pooled Cash - Whenever practical, local agency cash is consolidated into one bank account and invested on a pooled concept basis. Interest earnings are allocated quarterly according to month-end cash and investment balances for each fund.

IV. Competitive Bids - Purchase and sales of securities are made since competitive offers and bids when practical.

V. Cash Forecast - The cash flow for the City is analyzed with the receipt of revenues and maturity of investments scheduled so that adequate cash will be available to meet disbursement requirements.

VI. Investment Limitations - Security purchases and holdings are maintained within statutory limits imposed by the California Government Code. Current limits are:

Bankers Acceptances 40% Section 53601(f)
Commercial Paper 25% Section 53601(g)
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 30% Section 53601(h) Reverse Repurchase Agreements 20% Section 53601(i)
Medium Term Notes 30% Section 53601(j)
Money Market Mutual Funds 20% Section 53601(k)
Asset-Backed/Mortgage-Backed Securities 20% Section 53601(n) Federal Agency restriction 60% per Agency Section VI of Policy Local Agency Investment Fund $40,000,000 per Section VI of Policy Portfolio Maturing within one year 20% per Section IX of Policy VII. Liquidity - The marketability of a security is considered at the time of purchase, as the security may have to be sold at a later date to meet unanticipated cash demands.

VIII. Diversification - The portfolio should consist of a mix of various types of securities, issuers, and maturities.

IX. Evaluate Certificates of Deposit
a) Certificates of Deposit shall be evaluated in terms of FDIC coverage. For deposits in excess of the insured maximum of $100,000, approved collateral at full market value shall be required. (California Government Code Section 53652 and/or 53651(m) and 53651.2(a)(1).
b) Negotiable Certificates of Deposit shall be evaluated in terms of the creditworthiness of the issuer, as these deposits are uninsured and uncollateralized promissory notes.

15.e
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 11 CITY OF BARSTOW
INVESTMENT GUIDELINES AND STRATEGY (Continued)
X. STRATEGY - Strategy refers to the ability to manage financial resources in the most advantageous manner.

XI. Economic Forecasts - Economic Forecasts are obtained periodically from economists and financial experts through bankers and brokers to assist the Treasurer or his/her designee with the formulation of an investment strategy for the local agency.

XII. Implementing Investment Strategy - Investment transactions are executed which conform with anticipated interest rate trends and the current investment strategy plan.

XIII. Rapport - A close working relationship is maintained with large vendors of the city. The objective is to pinpoint when large disbursements will clear the city's bank account. It is essential for good cash control that such large expenditures be anticipated, estimated as to dollar amount, and communicated to the Treasurer or his/her designee for liquidity planning purposes.

XIV. Preserve Portfolio Value - Field standards are developed in order to maintain earnings near the market and to preserve the value of the portfolio.

15.e
Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 12 CITY OF BARSTOW

INVESTMENT PROCEDURES
INTERNAL CONTROL – GUIDELINES

OBJECTIVES OF INTERNAL CONTROL
Internal control is the plan of organization and all the related systems established by the management's objective of ensuring, as far as practicable:

1. The orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to management policies.

2. The safeguarding of assets.

3. The prevention or detection of errors and fraud.

4. The accuracy and completeness of the accounting records.

5. The timely preparation of reliable financial information.

LIMITATIONS OF INTERNAL CONTROL
No internal control system, however elaborate, can by itself guarantee the achievement of management's objectives. Internal control can provide only reasonable assurance that the objectives are met, because of its inherent limitations, including:

1. Management's usual requirement that a control be cost-effective.

2. The direction of most controls at recurring, rather than unusual, types of transactions.

3. Human error due to misunderstanding, carelessness, fatigue, or distraction.

4. Potential for collusion that circumvents controls dependent on the segregation of functions.

5. Potential for a person responsible for exercising control abusing that responsibility; a responsible staff member could be in a position to override controls which management has set up.

ELEMENTS OF INTERNAL CONTROL
Elements of a system of internal control are the means by which an organization can satisfy the objectives of internal control. These elements are:

1. ORGANIZATION
Specific responsibility for the performance of duties should be assigned and lines of authority and reporting clearly identified and understood.

2. PERSONNEL
Personnel should have capabilities commensurate with their responsibilities. Personnel selection and training policies together with the quality and quantity of supervision are thus important.

3. SEGREGATION OF FUNCTIONS
Segregation of incompatible functions reduces the risk that a person is in a position both to perpetrate and conceal errors or fraud in the normal course of duty. If two parts of a transaction are handled by different people, collusion is necessary to conceal errors or fraud. In particular, the functions that should be considered when evaluating

15.e
Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 13 CITY OF BARSTOW INVESTMENT PROCEDURES INTERNAL CONTROL - GUIDELINES (Continued)
segregation of functions are authorization, execution, recording, custody of assets, and performing reconciliations.

4. AUTHORIZATION
All transactions should be authorized by an appropriate responsible individual. The responsibilities and limits of authorization should be clearly delineated. The individual or group authorizing a specific transaction or granting general authority for transactions should be in a position commensurate with the nature and significance of the transactions.

Delegation of authority to authorize transactions should be handled very carefully.

5. CONTROLS OVER AN ACCOUNTING SYSTEM
Controls over an accounting system include the procedures, both manual and computerized, carried out independently to ascertain that transactions are complete, valid, authorized, and properly recorded.

15.e
Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 14 CITY OF BARSTOW CASH CONTROLS

PROCEDURES PERFORMED BY EXTERNAL AUDITORS

WITH RESPECT TO CASH RECEIPTS
A. City procedures and controls are reviewed. Some of the system strengths are:

1. Receipts are controlled upon receipt by proper registration devices.

2. Receipts are reconciled on a daily basis.

3. Amounts are deposited intact.

4. All bank accounts are authorized by resolution.

5. Cash counts are done by two or more individuals.

6. Bank reconciliations are reviewed.

7. Prompt posting of cash receipt entries in books.

8. Receipt forms are pre-numbered, accounted for, and physically secured.

9. Proper approval required for write-offs of customer accounts.

10. Checks are restrictively endorsed upon receipt or when run through cash register.

11. Adequate physical security over cash.

12. Individuals that handle cash do not post to customer account records or process billing statements.

13. Adequate supervision of Finance Department operations.

B. Significant revenues are confirmed directly with payer and compared with City accounting records to make sure amounts are recorded properly.

C. Cash balances are substantiated by confirming all account balances recorded in the accounting records. Bank reconciliations are reviewed for propriety and recalculated by the auditor. All significant reconciling items on bank reconciliations are verified as valid reconciling items by proving to subsequent bank statements.

15.e
Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 15 CITY OF BARSTOW

SEGREGATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES

OF THE TREASURY FUNCTIONS
Function Responsibility

1. Authorization of investment transactions:

Formal investment policy should be:
*Prepared by:
*Submitted to:

Investment transactions
should be approved by:

2. Execution of investment
Transactions

3. Investment transactions approved
for compliance with Investment
policy and/or State law

4. Timely recording of investment transactions:

Recording of investment
Transactions in the
Treasurer’s records
Recording of investment
transactions in the accounting
records

5. Verification of investment,
i.e., match broker confirmation
to Treasurer's records

6. Safeguarding of assets and records:

Reconciliation of Treasurer's
records to the accounting records
Reconciliation of records to bank
City Treasurer
City Council
City Treasurer
Treasurer/Deputy Treasurer
Finance Director
Sr. Accountant/Accountant
Sr. Accountant/Accountant
Finance Director
Sr. Accountant/Accountant
statements and safekeeping records Sr. Accountant/Accountant

15.e
Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 16 CITY OF BARSTOW

SEGREGATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES

OF THE TREASURY FUNCTIONS
(Continued)
Function Responsibility

6. Safeguarding of assets and records
(continued):

Annual review of (a) financial Finance Director
institution's financial condition,
(b)safety, liquidity, and potential
yields of investment instruments.

7. No less than an annual External Independent Auditors review of investment
portfolio as prepared by
Treasurer including:
•Investment types
•Purchase Price
•Par values
•Market values
•Maturity dates
•Investment yields
•Conformance to stated investment policy
•Safekeeping reports
The segregation of responsibilities of the Treasury functions as noted herein are intended to enhance the City’s internal controls over cash handling procedures. It should be noted that from time to time, due to the limited size of the Finance department staff, segregation of responsibilities as outlined herein may not be followed in order to fulfill the business needs of the organization.

15.e
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 17 2025-26 INVESTMENT POLICY

GLOSSARY
AGENCIES. Federal agency securities and/or government-sponsored enterprises.

ASKED: The price at which securities are offered.

BANKERS’ ACCEPTANCE (BA): A draft or bill or exchange accepted by a bank or trust company. The accepting institution guarantees payment of the bill, as well as the issuer.

BENCHMARK: A comparative base for measuring the performance or risk tolerance of the investment portfolio. A benchmark should represent a close correlation to the level of risk and the average duration of the portfolio’s investments.

BID: The price offered by a buyer of securities. See Offer.

BROKER: A broker brings buyers and sellers together for a commission.

CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT (CD): A time deposit with a specific maturity evidenced by a certificate. Large-denomination CD’s are typically negotiable.

COLLATERAL: Securities, evidence of deposit or other property, which a borrower pledges to secure repayment of a loan. Also refers to securities pledged by a bank to secure deposits of public monies.

COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR): The official annual report for the City of Barstow. It includes five combined statements for each individual fund and account group prepared in conformity with GAAP. It also includes supporting schedules necessary to demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal and contractual provisions, extensive introductory material, and a detailed Statistical Section.

COUPON: (a) The annual rate of interest that a bond’s issuer promises to pay the bondholder on the bond’s face value. (b) A certificate attached to a bond evidencing interest due on a payment date.

DEALER: A dealer, as opposed to a broker, acts as a principal in all transactions, buying and selling for his own account.

DEBENTURE: A bond secured only by the general credit of the issuer.

DELIVERY VERSUS PAYMENT: There are two methods of delivery of securities: delivery versus payment and delivery versus receipt. Delivery versus payment is delivery of securities with an exchange of money for the securities. Delivery versus receipt is delivery of securities with an exchange of signed receipt for the securities.

DERIVATIVES: (1) Financial instruments whose return profile is linked to, or derived from, the movement of one or more underlying index or security, and may include a leveraging factor, or

15.e
Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 18 (2) financial contracts based upon notional amounts whose value is derived from an underlying index or security (interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equities or commodities).

DISCOUNT: The difference between the cost price of a security and its maturity when quoted at lower than face value. A security selling below original offering price shortly after sale also is considered to be at a discount.

DISCOUNT SECURITIES: Non-interest bearing money market instruments that are issued a discount and redeemed at maturity for full face value, e. g., U. S. Treasury Bills.

DIVERSIFICATION: Dividing investment funds among a variety of securities offering independent returns.

FEDERAL CREDIT AGENCIES: Agencies of the Federal government set up to supply credit to various classes of institutions and individuals, e.g., S & L’s, small business firms, students, farmers, farm cooperatives, and exporters.

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION (FDIC): A federal agency that insures bank deposits, currently up to $250,000 per deposit.

FEDERAL FUNDS RATE: The rate of interest at which Fed funds are traded. This rate is currently pegged by the Federal Reserve through open-market operations.

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS (FHLB): Government sponsored wholesale banks (currently 12 regional banks), which lend funds and provide correspondent banking services to member commercial banks, thrift institutions, credit unions and insurance companies. The mission of the FHLBs is to liquefy the housing related assets of its members who must purchase stock in their district Bank.

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (FNMA): FNMA, like GNMA was chartered under the Federal National Mortgage Association Act in 1938. FNMA is a federal corporation working under the auspices of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). It is the largest single provider of residential mortgage funds in the United States. Fannie Mae, as the corporation is called, is a private stockholder-owned corporation. The corporation’s purchases include a variety of adjustable mortgages and second loans, in addition to fixed-rate mortgages.

FNMA’s securities are also highly liquid and are widely accepted. FNMA assumes and guarantees that all security holders will receive timely payment of principal and interest.

FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE (FOMC): Consists of seven members of the Federal Reserve Board and five of the twelve Federal Reserve Bank Presidents. The President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank is a permanent member, while the other Presidents serve on a rotating basis. The Committee periodically meets to set Federal Reserve guidelines regarding purchases and sales of Government Securities in the open market as a means of influencing the volume of bank credit and money.

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM: The central bank of the United States created by Congress and consisting of a seven member Board of Governors in Washington, D. C., 12 regional banks and about 5,700 commercial banks that are members of the system.

GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (GNMA or Ginnie Mae): securities influencing the volume of bank credit guaranteed by GNMA and issued by mortgage bankers, commercial banks, savings and loan associations, and other institutions. Security holder is protected by full faith and credit of the U. S. Government. Ginnie Mae securities are backed by

15.e
Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 19 the FHA, VA or FmHa mortgages. The term “pass-throughs” is often used to describe Ginnie Maes.

LIQUIDITY: A liquid asset is one that can be converted easily and rapidly into cash without a substantial loss of value. In the money market, a security is said to be liquid if the spread between bid and asked prices is narrow and reasonable size can be done at those quotes.

LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOL (LGIP): The aggregate of all funds from political subdivisions that are placed in the custody of the State Treasurer for investment and reinvestment.

MARKET VALUE: The price at which a security is trading and could presumably be purchased or sold.

MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT: A written contract covering all future transactions between the parties to repurchase – reverse repurchase agreements that establishes each party’s rights in the transactions. A master agreement will often specify, among other things, the right of the buyer-lender to liquidate the underlying securities in the event of default by the sellerborrower.

MATURITY: The date upon which the principal or stated value of an investment becomes due and payable.

MONEY MARKET: The market in which short-term debt instruments (bills, commercial paper, bankers’ acceptances, etc.) are issued and traded.

OFFER: The price asked by a seller of securities. (When you are buying securities, you ask for an offer.) See Asked and Bid.

OPEN MARKET OPERATIONS: Purchases and sales of government and certain other securities in the open market by the New York Federal Reserve Bank as directed by the FOMC in order to influence the volume of money and credit in the economy. Purchases inject reserves into the bank system and stimulate growth of money and credit; sales have the opposite effect. Open market operations are the Federal Reserve’s most important and most flexible monetary policy tool.

PORTFOLIO: Collection of securities held by an investor.

PRIMARY DEALER: A group of government securities dealers who submit daily reports of market activity and positions and monthly financial statements to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and are subject to its informal oversight. Primary dealers include Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)-registered securities broker-dealers, banks, and a few unregulated firms.

PRUDENT PERSON RULE: An investment standard. In some states the law requires that a fiduciary, such as a trustee, may invest money only in a list of securities selected by the custody state-the do-called legal list. In other states, the trustee may invest in a security if it is one, which would be bought by a prudent person of discretion and intelligence who is seeking a reasonable income and preservation of capital.

15.e
Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 20 QUALIFIED PUBLIC DEPOSITORIES: A financial institution which does not claim exemption from the payment of any sales or compensating use or ad valorem taxes under the laws of this state, which has segregated for the benefit of the commission eligible collateral having a value of not less than its maximum liability and which has been approved by the Public Deposit Protection Commission to hold public deposits.

RATE OF RETURN: The yield obtainable on a security based on its purchase price or its current market price. This may be the amortized yield to maturity on a bond the current income return.

REPURCHASE AGREEMENT (RP OR REPO): A holder of securities sells these securities to an investor with an agreement to repurchase them at a fixed price on a fixed date. The security “buyer” in effect lends the “seller” money for the period of the agreement, and the terms of the agreement are structured to compensate him for this. Dealers use RP extensively to finance their positions. Exception: When the Fed is said to be doing RP, it is lending money that is, increasing bank reserves.

SAFEKEEPING: A service to customers rendered by banks for a fee whereby securities and valuables for all types and descriptions are held in the bank’s vaults for protection.

SECONDARY MARKET: A market made for the purchase and sale of outstanding issues following the initial distribution.

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISION: Agency created by Congress to protect investors in securities transactions by administering securities legislation.

SEC RULE 15C3-1: See Uniform Net Capital Rule.

STRUCTURED NOTES: Notes issued by Government Sponsored Enterprises (FHLB, FNMA, SLMA, etc.) and Corporations, which have imbedded options (E.G., call features, step-up coupons, floating rate coupons, derivative-based returns) into their debt structure. Their market performance is impacted by the fluctuation of interest rates, the volatility of the imbedded options and shifts in the shape of the yield curve.

TREASURY BILLS: A non-interest bearing discount security issued by the U. S. treasury to finance the national debt. Most bills are issued to mature in three months, six months, or one year.

TREASURY BONDS: Long-term coupon-bearing U. S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U. S. Government and having initial maturities of more than 10 years.

TREASURY NOTES: Medium-term coupon-bearing U. S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U. S. Government and having initial maturities from two to ten years.

UNIFORM NET CAPITAL RULE: Securities and Exchange Commission requirement that member firms as well as nonmember broker-dealers in securities maintain a maximum ratio of indebtedness to liquid capital of 15 to 1; also called net capital rule and net capital ratio.

Indebtedness covers all money owed to a firm, including margin loans and commitments to purchase securities, one reason new public issues are spread among members of underwriting syndicates. Liquid capital includes cash and assets easily converted into cash.

YIELD: The rate of annual income return on an investment, expressed as a percentage. (a) INCOME YIELD is obtained by dividing the current dollar income by the current market price for the security. (b) NET YIELD or YIELD TO MATURITY is the current income yield minus any

15.e
Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 21 premium above par or plus any discount from par in purchase price, with the adjustment spread over the period from the date of purchase to the date of maturity of the bond.

15.e
Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) 22 RESOLUTION NO. ______-2025

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BARSTOW,

CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CITY OF BARSTOW INVESTMENT POLICY

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BARSTOW DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 53607 of the Government Code of the State of California, the City Treasurer is hereby authorized (a) to invest such portion of any sinking fund of, or idle money in, the City Treasury, not required for the immediate necessities of the City as is deemed wise or expedient, in securities in which this Council is authorized to invest such sums by the provisions of State Government Code Section 53601 and Section 53635, limited by the City’s Investment Policy; and (b) to sell, or exchange for other eligible securities, and reinvest the proceeds of the securities purchased. The City Treasurer shall make a monthly report of such transactions to this Council.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Barstow has adopted the 2025-26 Statement of Investment Policy as set forth in the attached document. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon be in full force and effect.

APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Barstow, California, this 17th day of June, 2025
______________________________
Timothy R. Silva,
Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Andrea Flores
City Clerk

15.e
Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: FY26 Investment Policy with Cover (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) City Council Resolution No. _____-2025 1
RESOLUTION NO. _____-2025

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BARSTOW,

CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/2026 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 9 OF TITLE I OF THE CALIFORNIA
GOVERNMENT CODE.

WHEREAS, Article XIII B of the Constitution of the State of California as proposed by the Initiative Measure approved by the people at the special statewide election held on November 6, 1979, provides that the total annual appropriations limit of such entity for the prior year be adjusted for changes in the cost of living and population except as otherwise specifically provided for in said Articles; and
WHEREAS, the State Legislature added Division 9 (commencing with Section 7900) to Title I of the Government Code of the State of California to implement Article XIII B of the California Constitution; and
WHEREAS, Section 7910 of the Government Code provides that each year the governing body of each local jurisdiction shall, by resolution, establish its appropriations limit for the following fiscal year pursuant to Article XIII B at a regularly scheduled meeting or a noticed special meeting and that fifteen days prior to such meeting, documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit shall be available to the public; and
WHEREAS, Section 7902(a) of the Government Code sets forth the method for determining the appropriations limit for each local jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Barstow wishes to establish the appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 for the City of Barstow, California; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Barstow, California, as follows:

Section 1: That it is hereby found and determined that the documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit for the City of Barstow for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 was available to the public in the Finance Department of said City at least fifteen days prior to this date.

Section 2: That the appropriations limit for the City of Barstow was established in accordance with Section 7902(a) of the California Government Code is $59,756,788. The City of Barstow is $30,978,666 under the limit.

15.f
Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: 26 Gann Limit Attachment - City (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) City Council Resolution No. _____-2025 2
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 17TH DAY OF JUNE 2025
Timothy R. Silva,
Mayor
ATTEST:

I, Andrea Flores, City Clerk for the City of Barstow, California and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council, do hereby certify, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. _____-2025 which was introduced and adopted at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Barstow held on the 17th day of June, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
_____________________________
Andrea Flores, City Clerk
Andrea Flores
City Clerk

15.f
Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: 26 Gann Limit Attachment - City (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) $ 55,895,349

0.44%

6.44%

1.06908336
FY 2024-25 Appropriations Limit
Change in County Population* = .44% OR
Change in City Population * = -0.55%
Change in Non-Residential Assessed Valuation** = 12.89% OR Change in Per Capita Income* = 6.44%
Cumulative Compound Change Factor
(1.0044x1.0644)
FY 2025-26 Appropriations Limit $ 59,756,788

SUMMARY
28,778,122
$ (59,756,788)
FY 2023-24 Net Proceeds of Taxes Subject to the Limit*** Less: FY 2025-26 Appropriation Limit
Budget Appropriation Over (Under) the Limit $ (30,978,666) *Number provided from Department of Finance
**Number provided from HDL
***The appropriations subject to limitation includes proceeds of taxes from General Fund, and Special Revenue Funds For the City of Barstow, the taxes proceeds include: Property Taxes, Sales Taxes, Measure Q, TOT and Business Licenses

CITY OF BARSTOW

APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT CALCULATION
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26

15.f
Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: 26 Gann Limit Attachment - City (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) May 2025
Dear Fiscal Officer:

Subject: Price Factor and Population Information
Appropriations Limit
California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 2227 requires the Department of Finance to transmit an estimate of the percentage change in population to local governments. Each local jurisdiction must use their percentage change in population factor for January 1, 2025, in conjunction with a change in the cost of living, or price factor, to calculate their appropriations limit for fiscal year 2025-26. Attachment A provides the change in California’s per capita personal income and an example for utilizing the price factor and population percentage change factor to calculate the 2025-26 appropriations limit. Attachment B provides the city and unincorporated county population percentage change along with the population percentage change for counties and their summed incorporated areas. The population percentage change data excludes federal and state institutionalized populations and military populations.

Population Percent Change for Special Districts
Some special districts must establish an annual appropriations limit. California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 2228 provides additional information regarding the appropriations limit.

Article XIII B, Section 9(C) of the California Constitution exempts certain special districts from the appropriations limit calculation mandate. The code section and the California Constitution can be accessed at the following website: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes.xhtml.

Special districts required by law to calculate their appropriations limit must present the calculation as part of their annual audit. Any questions special districts have on this requirement should be directed to their county, district legal counsel, or the law itself. No state agency reviews the local appropriations limits.

Population Certification
The population certification program applies only to cities and counties. California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 11005.6 mandates Finance to automatically certify any population estimate that exceeds the current certified population with the State Controller’s Office. Finance will certify the higher estimate to the State Controller by June 1, 2025.

Please Note: The prior year’s city population estimates may be revised. The per capita personal income change is based on historical data.

If you have any questions regarding this data, please contact the Demographic Research Unit at (916) 323-4086.

JOE STEPHENSHAW
Director
By:

ERIKA LI
Chief Deputy Director
Attachment

15.f
Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: 26 Gann Limit Attachment - City (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) May 2025
Attachment A
A. Price Factor: Article XIII B specifies that local jurisdictions select their cost of living factor to compute their appropriation limit by a vote of their governing body. The cost of living factor provided here is per capita personal income. If the percentage change in per capita personal income is selected, the percentage change to be used in setting the fiscal year 2025-26 appropriation limit is:

Per Capita Personal Income
Fiscal Year Percentage change
(FY) over prior year
2025-26 6.44
B. Following is an example using sample population change and the change in California per capita personal income as growth factors in computing a 2025-26 appropriation limit.
2025-26:

Per Capita Cost of Living Change = 6.44 percent
Population Change = 0.28 percent
Per Capita Cost of Living converted to a ratio: 6.44 + 100 = 1.0644 100
Population converted to a ratio: 0.28 + 100 = 1.0028
100
Calculation of factor for FY 2025-26: 1.0644 x 1.0028 = 1.0674

15.f
Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: 26 Gann Limit Attachment - City (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD) FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2024 to January 1, 2025 and Total Population January 1, 2025 City County Percent Change 24-25
Population Minus
Exclusions 1-1-24
Population Minus
Exclusions 1-1-25 Total Population 1-1-25
Adelanto City San Bernardino 1.42 36,629 37,150 37,150
Apple Valley Town San Bernardino -0.11 75,339 75,255 75,262 Barstow City San Bernardino -0.55 24,634 24,498 24,811
Big Bear Lake City San Bernardino -0.48 4,977 4,953 4,953 Chino City San Bernardino 1.76 90,123 91,712 95,206
Chino Hills City San Bernardino -0.18 77,452 77,314 77,314 Colton City San Bernardino -0.42 53,505 53,278 53,278
Fontana City San Bernardino 0.96 217,084 219,172 219,172 Grand Terrace City San Bernardino -0.51 12,868 12,803 12,803 Hesperia City San Bernardino 0.54 101,248 101,792 101,792 Highland City San Bernardino 1.16 56,436 57,088 57,088
Loma Linda City San Bernardino -0.19 25,323 25,276 25,322 Montclair City San Bernardino -0.38 37,670 37,526 37,526 Needles City San Bernardino -0.54 4,817 4,791 4,791
Ontario City San Bernardino 0.84 182,875 184,404 184,404 Rancho Cucamonga City San Bernardino 0.44 175,227 175,992 175,992 Redlands City San Bernardino 0.10 73,416 73,488 73,488
Rialto City San Bernardino 1.09 104,426 105,565 105,565 San Bernardino City San Bernardino 0.08 221,218 221,387 222,727 Twentynine Palms City San Bernardino 7.84 14,775 15,934 24,257 Upland City San Bernardino -0.23 79,326 79,140 79,140
Victorville City San Bernardino 0.49 135,981 136,652 141,013 Yucaipa City San Bernardino 0.51 54,561 54,838 54,838
Yucca Valley Town San Bernardino 0.03 22,021 22,027 22,027 Balance of County San Bernardino -0.22 290,454 289,811 297,505 Incorporated San Bernardino 0.54 1,881,931 1,892,035 1,909,919 County Total San Bernardino 0.44 2,172,385 2,181,846 2,207,424 *Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.

15.f
Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: 26 Gann Limit Attachment - City (6022 : FY 2025/2026 Budget Approval for City and BFPD)

NONRESIDENTIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION

THE CITY OF BARSTOW
FOR USE IN CALCULATING 2025/26 GANN LIMIT
2023/24 TO 2024/25 TAX YEARS - IN PARCEL NUMBER ORDER
Current Year
Improvements
Prior Year
Parcel Use Category Owner Improvements
Percent
Change
0181-076-05-0000 Commercial Seligman Living Trust 31,200 35,000 + 12.2% 0181-102-11-0000 Commercial Krommenhoek Barbara 104,500 107,600 + 3.0% 0181-321-04-0000 Institutional Desert Inheritance Ministries Inc 200,000 230,000 + 15.0% 0181-592-01-8000 Miscellaneous Golden State Water Company 211,000 240,000 + 13.7% 0181-632-12-0000 Commercial Rajdeep Family Living Trust 12 21 23 0 25,000 + 99,999.9% 0181-841-01-0000 Commercial Tcm Lewis Enterprises 352,145 583,588 + 65.7% 0182-113-18-8000 Miscellaneous Golden State Water Company 112,000 127,000 + 13.4% 0183-171-24-0000 Commercial Mr Sodhi Inc 0 449,000 + 99,999.9% 0183-321-16-0000 Commercial Theme Family Lp 693,600 721,300 + 4.0% 0183-501-88-8000 Miscellaneous Golden State Water Company 40,000 45,000 + 12.5% 0421-313-21-0000 Commercial 2567 Commerce Way Llc 0 1,632,000 + 99,999.9% 0426-061-09-8000 Miscellaneous Golden State Water Company 416,000 472,000 + 13.5% 0428-351-08-0000 Commercial Barstow Hospitality Llc 4,250,000 14,000,000 + 229.4% 13 Parcels Listed 6,410,445 18,667,488 + 191.2%
This calculation reflects the 2024/25 increase in taxable values for this city due to non-residential new construction as a percentage of the total taxable value Increase (as of the 2024/25 lien year roll date). This percentage may be used as an alternative to the change in California per-capita personal income for calculating a taxing agency's annual adjustment of its Appropriation Limit pursuant to Article XIIIB of the State Constitution as Amended by Proposition 111 in June, 1990.
12,257,043
-128,209
12,128,834
94,075,690

12.89%
Total Change in Non-Residential Valuation Due to New Development Less Automatic 2.000% Assessors's Inflation Adjustment
Actual Change in Non-Residential Valuation
Change in Total Assessed Value
= Alternate 2025/26 Appropriations Limit Factor
Includes taxable primary parcels with known nonresidential use codes, no prior lien year transfers, and improvement value increases greater than 2.0% Change in Total Assessed Value is the assessed value change of the locally assessed secured and unsecured tax rolls .

This report is not to be used in support of debt issuance or continuing disclosure statements without the written consent of HdL, Coren & Cone Data Source: San Bernardino County Assessor 2024/25 Secured Tax Rolls Prepared On 11/1/2024 By MV

Page 26 ends

Barstow City CouncilJune 17, 2025

Barstow City Council
June 17, 2025