BEAUMONT
-CALF F O R N 1 A
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED & REGULAR SESSION
550 E. Sixth Street, Beaumont, CA
Tuesday, January 04, 2022
Closed Session: 5:00 PM 1 Regular Meeting: 6:00 PM
Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packets are available for public inspection in the City Clerk's office at 550 E. 6th Street during normal business hours.
AGENDA
MEETING PARTICIPATION NOTICE
This meeting will be conducted utilizing teleconference communications and will be recorded for live streaming as well as open to public attendance subject to social distancing and applicable health orders. All City of Beaumont public meetings will be available via live streaming and made available on the City's official YouTube webpage. Please use the following link during the meeting for live stream access.
beaumontca.gov/livestream
Public comments will be accepted using the following options. 1 Written comments will be accepted via email and will be read aloud during the corresponding item of the meeting. Public comments shall not exceed three (3) minutes unless otherwise authorized by City Council. Comments can be submitted anytime prior to the meeting as well as during the meeting up until the end of the corresponding item. Please submit your comments to: nicolewcbeaumontca.gov
2. Phone-in comments will be accepted by joining a conference line prior to the corresponding item of the meeting. Public comments shall not exceed three (3) minutes unless otherwise authorized by City Council. Please use the following phone number to join the call (951) 922 - 4845.
3. In person comments subject to the adherence of the applicable health orders and social distancing requirements.
In compliance with the American Disabilities Act, if you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office using the above email or call (951) 572 - 3196.
Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will ensure the best reasonable accommodation arrangements.
1 CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 PM
A Closed Session of the City Council / Beaumont Financing Authority / Beaumont Utility Authority / Beaumont Successor Agency (formerly RDA)/Beaumont Parking Authority / Beaumont Public Improvement Authority may be held in accordance with state law which may include, but is not limited to, the following types of items: personnel matters, labor negotiations, security matters, providing instructions to real property negotiators and conference with legal counsel regarding pending litigation. Any public comment on Closed Session items will be taken prior to the Closed Session. Any required announcements or discussion of Closed Session items or actions following the Closed Session with be made in the City Council Chambers.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor White, Mayor Pro Tem Martinez, Council Member Fenn, Council Member Santos, Council Member Lara
Public Comments Regarding Closed Session
1. Conference with Labor Negotiators - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 City Designated Representatives City Manager Todd Parton and Administrative Services Director Kari Mendoza. Employee Organizations: Beaumont Police Officers Association, SEIU and Managers Professional Technical Unit
2. Conference with Legal Counsel Regarding Potential Initiation of Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4): One Potential Case
3. Conference with Legal Counsel — Anticipated Litigation: Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) - Claim by Weka, Inc.
4. Annual Public Employee Performance Evaluation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 Title: City Manager
Adjourn to Regular Session
REGULAR SESSION - 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor White, Mayor Pro Tem Martinez, Council Member Fenn, Council Member Santos, Council Member Lara
Report out from Closed Session
Action on any Closed Session Items
Action of any Requests for Excused Absence
Pledge of Allegiance
Invocation
Adjustments to the Agenda
Conflict of Interest Disclosure
ANNOUNCEMENTS/ RECOGNITION / PROCLAMATIONS / CORRESPONDENCE
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD (ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA)
2 Any one person may address the City Council on any matter not on this agenda. If you wish to speak, please fill out a "Public Comment Form" provided at the back table and give it to the City Clerk. There is a three (3) minute time limit on public comments. There will be no sharing or passing of time to another person. State Law prohibits the City Council from discussing or taking actions brought up by your comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Items on the consent calendar are taken as one action item unless an item is pulled for further discussion here or at the end of action items. Approval of all Ordinances and Resolutions to be read by title only.
1. Ratification of Warrants
Recommended Action:
Ratify Warrants dated:
December 13, 2021, and
December 20, 2021.
2. FY2022 General Fund and Wastewater Budget to Actual through November, 2021 Recommended Action:
Receive and file the attached reports.
3. Re -Ratification of Local Emergency and Re -Authorizing the Use of Teleconferencing to Conduct Public Meetings
Recommended Action:
Waive the full reading and adopt by title only, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Beaumont Proclaiming a Local Emergency Persists, Re -Ratifying the Proclamation of a State of Emergency by Executive Order N-09-21, and Re - Authorizing Remote Teleconference Meetings of the Legislative Bodies of the City of Beaumont for the Period of January 6, 2022, through February 5, 2022, Pursuant to Provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act."
4. Consider Adopting a Resolution Waiving the Monthly Facility Use at the Albert A.
Chatigny Sr. Community Recreation Center (CRC) for Beaumont Community Youth Basketball (BCYB)
Recommended Action:
Waive the full reading and approve by title only, "A Resolution of the City of Beaumont authorizing the waiver of monthly facility use fees at the Albert A.
Chatigny Sr. Community Recreation Center (CRC) for Beaumont Community Youth Basketball (BCYB)."
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Approval of all Ordinances and Resolutions to be read by title only.
ACTION ITEMS
Approval of all Ordinances and Resolutions to be read by title only.
5. Notice of Upcoming Vacancy on the Beaumont Planning Commission Recommended Action:
3 Direct staff to notice the upcoming vacancy of one seat with a partial term on the Beaumont Planning Commission.
City of Beaumont Grant Policies and Procedures
Recommended Action:
Approve the proposed City of Beaumont Grant Policies and Procedures.
Discussion of Beaumont Police Department Response to Calls for Illegal Fireworks and Provide Direction to City Staff
Recommended Action:
Discuss and provide direction to City staff.
Direct the Beaumont Economic Development Committee to Assist Downtown Business and Landowners to Promote Business Growth and Development in the Central Business District
Recommended Action:
Direct the Beaumont Economic Development Committee to assist downtown business and landowners to promote business growth and development in the central business district.
Discussion and Direction to City Staff on Comments to the Draft Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Report Prepared for the IH-10/Cherry Valley Interchange Project
Recommended Action:
City Council discuss the Draft Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Report and provide direction to City staff on any comments that should be forwarded to Caltrans;
City Council discuss the proposed alternative alignments and provide direction to City staff on any comments that should be forwarded to Caltrans; and Authorize Mayor Lloyd White to execute a letter conveying City Council comments to Caltrans no later than January 24, 2022.
LEGISLATIVE UPDATES AND DISCUSSION
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT UPDATE
Economic Development Committee Report Out and City Council Direction
CITY TREASURER REPORT
Finance and Audit Committee Report Out and City Council Direction
CITY CLERK REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
4 CITY MANAGER REPORT
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCIL REPORTS
- Lara
- Santos
- Fenn
- Martinez
- White
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the Beaumont City Council, Beaumont Financing Authority, the Beaumont Successor Agency (formerly RDA), the Beaumont Utility Authority, the Beaumont Parking Authority and the Beaumont Public Improvement Agency is scheduled for Tuesday, January 18, 2022, at 5:00 p.m., unless otherwise posted.
5 Item 1.
AGENDA rrEM No.
BEAUMONT
—cA L1 F0RNIA--
Printed Checks
Invoice -Pay
Bank Drafts
WARRANTS TO ]3E RATT'TFD
Midday, December 13, 2021
110869-110883 $ 12,575.55 FY 21/22
538-543 $ 13,225.33
.:APA000013-A13 A.000094 $ . 370,385.26
A/P Total 5 396,186;14
Global Payments
Authnet Gateway
Ca1P.ERS
MG Tast
Affant
Guardian
Kaiser Foundation
Return, Settlement
8 $
$
8 8
8 ;5
$
5 8
8 $
5 9,857.06 Credit Card Fees
65.20 Credit Card Processing Fees
4.6,803,21 743 Classic
45,624,91 742 Classic
17,195.71 27308 PEPRA
16,187.64 25763 PERM.
25,804,44 457 Paydate 11/19/21
3,706,75 401a Paydate 12/03/21
3,554.71 401a Paydate 11/19/21
827.81 FICA Paydate 12/03/21
801,06 FICA Paydate 1.1/19/21
650.75 Dec -21
23,544.49 21 -Dec •
178,00 ESA Paydate 12/03/21
$ 8,246.25 Bank Draft Returns
I DO HEREBY CERTIFS." THIS WARRANT LIST RAS BEEN COTti f.'ILED AND PREPARED TO A6RFT THE DAILY OPERATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2021 - JUNE 30, 2022 SIGNATURE:
TITLE;, CITY T' •y
SIGNAT
TITLE; FINANCED
6 Check R
Item 1.
City of Beaumont{ CA
BEAUMONT
—4 „ P OlE 00Po••••
By Check Number
Date Range: 12/03/2021 - 12/13/2021
12/13/2021 12:96:26 PM
Check Report Date Range: 12/03/2021
Item 1.
1 Vendor Number
Bank Code: APBNK-AP
2725
Payable #
74000971293393
24013391301002
24035991308900
24040481292091
24040831285900
24040831301900
74071051286939
74071051292939
2411641131309,E
2411641;313091,
24116411313091
24116411313091
24116411313400
24116411313400
24116411313400
24116411313400
24137461284500
24137461285500
24137461286500
24137461287500
24137461288501,
24137461292500
24137461292500
24137461294500
24137461294500
Vendor Name
Bank
US BANK CORPORATE
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100-1225-7066-0000
Invoice
100-0000-2026-0000
Invoice
200-6000-7085.6055
Invoice
100.0000-2026-0000
Invoice
100-6000-7085-5400
Invoice
100-6000-7085-5100
Invoice
100-0000-2026-0000
Invoice
200-2050-7066-0000
Invoice
100-6050-7053-0000
Invoice
100-6050-7053-0000
Invoice
750-7800-7053-0000
Invoice
750-7600-7053-0000
Invoice
100-6050-7053.0000
Invoice
100-6050-7053-0000
Invoke
750.7800-7053-0000
Invoice
750-7600-7053-000Q
Invoice
100-2050-7035-0000
Invoice
700-4050-7070.000Q
Invoice
700-4050-7070-0000
Invoice
700-4050-7090-0000
Invoice
100-6050-7090-5100
Invoice
100.2050-7035-0000
Invoice
100-6050-7090.5999
Invoice
700-4050-7070-0000
Invoice
Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount PAYMENT SYSTEMS 12/10/2021 EFT
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name Item Description
12/09/2021 TOWN AND COUNTRY -TRAVEL FOR CON
TRAVEL, EDUCATION, TRA TOWN AND COUNTRY -TRAVEL
12/09/2021 TOP -LINE INDUSTRIAL -
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP TOP -LINE INDUSTRIAL -
12/09/2021 LA APPLIANCES - BUILDING MAINTENANC
BLDG MAINT- FIRE STATIO LA APPLIANCES - BUILDING MAI
12/09/2021 CART GUY -
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SW CART GUY -
12/09/2021 PRO PIPE & SUPPLY- BUILDING MAINTEN
BLDG MAINT - SPORTS PA PRO PIPE&SUPPLY- BUILDING
12/09/2021 ACTION TRUE VALUE HARDWARE - BUILD]
BLDG MAINT - FALLEN HE ACTION TRUE VALUE HARDWAR
12/09/2021 RIVERSIDE SHERIFF BEN CLARK - EMP TRA
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP RIVERSIDE SHERIFF BEN CLARK -
12/09/2021 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF BEN CLARK -
TRAVEL, EDUCATION, TRA RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF BE
12/09/2021 CA DMV - DUPLICATE TITLE FEE
PERMITS, FEES AND LICE CA DMV- DUPLICATE TITLE FEE
12/09/2021 CA DMV- DUPLICATE TITLE FEE
PERMITS, FEES AND LICE CA DMV- DUPLICATE TITLE FEE
12/09/2021 CA DMV - DUPLICATE TITLE FEE
PERMITS, FEES AND LICE CA DMV - DUPLICATE TITLE FEE
12/09/2021 CA DMV - DUPLICATE TITLE FEE
PERMITS, FEES AND LICE CA DMV - DUPLICATE TITLE FEE
12/09/2021 CA DMV -SERVICE FEE
PERMITS, FEES AND LICE CA DMV - SERVICE FEE
12/09/2021 CA DMV - SERVICE FEE
PERMITS, FEES AND LICE CA DMV - SERVICE FEE
12/09/2021 CA DMV - SERVICE FEE
PERMITS, FEES AND LICE CA DMV-SERVICE FEE
12/09/2021 CA DMV -SERVICE FEE
PERMITS, FEES AND LICE CA DMV- SERVICE FEE
12/09/2021 STATER BROS - CITIZENS ACADEMY SUPPLI
LOCAL MEETINGS STATER BROS - CITIZENS ACADE
12/09/2021 BMT DO IT BEST - DEPT SUPPLIES
SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES BMT DO IT BEST- DEPT SUPPLIE
12/09/2021 BMT DO IT BEST- DEPT SUPPLIES
SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES BMT DO IT BEST - DEPT SUPPLIE
12/09/2021 BMT DO IT BEST- EQUIPMENT MAINTEN
EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES/M BMT DO IT BEST- EQUIPMENT
12/09/2021 BMT DO IT BEST - EQUIPMENT MAINTEN
EQUIP SUPPLIES/MAINT- BMT DO IT BEST - EQUIPMENT
12/09/2021 STATER BROS - CITIZENS ACADEMY SUPPLI
LOCAL MEETINGS STATER BROS - CITIZENS ACADE
12/09/2021 BMT DO IT BEST - EQUIPMENT MAINTEN
EQUIP SUPPLIES/MAINT - BMT DO IT BEST - EQUIPMENT
12/09/2021 BMT DO IT BEST- DEPT SUPPLIES
SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES BMT DO IT BEST - DEPT SUPPLIE
12/09/2021 BMT DO IT BEST -
0.00 13,225.33 538
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 258.31
258.31
0.00 151.67
151.67
0.00 323.25
323.25
0.00 50.00
50.00 0.00 243.31
243.31
0.00 3.32
3.32 0.00 143.17
143.17
0.00 380.07
380.07
0.00 23.00
23.00 0.00 23.00
23.00 0.00 23.00
23.00 0.00 23.00
23.00 0.00 0.53
0.53 0.00 0.53
0.53 0.00 0.53
0.53 0.00 0.53
0.53 0.00 5.99
5.99 0.00 70.29
70.29 0.00 10.75
10.75 0.00 7.53
7.53 0.00 6.06
6.06 0.00 26.03
26.03 0.00 22.29
22.29 0.00 18.31
18.31 0.00 13.66
12/13/2021 12:46:26 PM Page 2 of 13
8 Check Report
Vendor Number
24137461295501
24137461298500
24137461300500
24137461301500
24137461301500
24137461301500
24137461301500
24137461302500
24137461302500
74137461302500
24137461305500
24137461307500
24137461308500
24137461309001
24137461309500
24137461309500
74137461309500
24137461310501
24137461313500
24137461313500
24137461314500
24137461314500
24164071314060
24204291302000
24204291307009
24204291322006
Vendor Name
100-0000-2026.0000
Invoice
700.4050-7070-0000
Invoice
100-0000-2026.0000
Invoice
700-4050-7035-0000
Invoice
100-2050-7070-0000
Invoice
700-4050-7070-0000
invoice
700.4050.1070-0000
Invoice
100-2050-7035-0000
Invoice
100-6000-7085-5100
Invoice
100-6050-7090-5999
Invoice
700-4050-7070.0000
Invoice
100-0000-2026.0000
Invoice
700-4050-7085-0000
Invoice
100.6050-7090-5999
Invoice
700-4050-7085-0000
Invoice
100-0000-2026.0000
Invoice
100.6050-7090.5999
Invoice
750.8300-7037-0000
Invoice
100-6050-7090-5999
Invoice
100-2050-7035-0000
Invoice
100.2050-7035-0000
Invoice
750-7300-7037-0000
Invoice
100-2050-7035.0000
Invoice
500-0000-7068-0000
Invoice
100-0000-2026-0000
Invoice
100-1230-7071-0000
Invoice
Payment Date Payment Type
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP BMT DO IT BEST -
Date Range: 12/03/202
Discount Amount Payment Amount
13.66 12/09/2021 BMT DO IT BEST - DEPT SUPPLIES
SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES BMT 001T BEST- DEPT SUPPLIE
12/09/2021 BMT DO IT BEST -
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP BMT DO IT BEST -
12/09/2021 WWTP TOUR/MEETING - MEETING SUPPL
LOCAL MEETINGS WWTP TOUR/MEETING - MEET=
12/09/2021 STATER BROS - DEPT AWARDS SUPPLIES
SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES STATER BROS - DEPT AWARDS 5
12/09/2021 BMT DO IT BEST- DEPT SUPPLIES
SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES BMT DO IT BEST- DEPT SUPPLIE
12/09/2021 BMT DO IT BEST - DEPT SUPPLIES
SPECIAL DEPTSUPPLIES BMT DO IT BEST - DEPT SUPPLIE
12/09/2021 STATER BROS - MEETING SUPPLIES
LOCAL MEETINGS STATER BROS - MEETING SUPPLI
12/09/2021 BMT DO IT BEST - BUILDING MAINTENAN
BLDG MAINT- FALLEN HE BMT DO IT BEST- BUILDING MA
12/09/2021 BMT DO IT BEST- EQUIPMENT MAINTEN
EQUIP SUPPLIES/MAINT - BMT DO IT BEST EQUIPMENT
12/09/2021 BMT DO IT BEST - DEPT SUPPLIES
SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES BMT DO IT BEST- DEPT SUPPLIE
12/09/2021 STATER BROS -
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP STATER BROS -
12/09/2021 BMT DO IT BEST - BUILDING MAINTENAN
BUILDING SUPPLIES/MAI BMT DO IT BEST - BUILDING MA
12/09/2021 BMT DO IT BEST - EQUIPMENT MAINTEN
EQUIP SUPPLIES/MAINT - BMT DO IT BEST - EQUIPMENT
12/09/2021 TRACTOR SUPPLY- BUILDING MAINTENA
BUILDING SUPPLIES/MAI TRACTOR SUPPLY - BUILDING M
12/09/2021 STATERS BROS -
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP STATERS BROS -
12/09/2021 BMT DO IT BEST- EQUIPMENT MAINTEN
EQUIP SUPPLIES/MAINT- BMT DO IT BEST - EQUIPMENT
12/09/2021 BMT DO 1T BEST - VEHICLE MAINTENANC
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BMT DO IT BEST- VEHICLE MAI
12/09/2021 BMT DO IT BEST - EQUIPMENT MAINTEN
EQUIP SUPPLIES/MAINT - BMT DO IT BEST - EQUIPMENT
12/09/2021 STATER BROS - CITIZENS ACADEMY SUPPLI
LOCAL MEETINGS STATER BROS - CITIZENS ACADE
12/09/2021 YUM YUM - CITIZENS ACADEMY SUPPLIES
LOCAL MEETINGS YUM YUM - CITIZENS ACADEMY
12/09/2021 BMT DO IT BEST - VEHICLE MAINTENANC
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BMT DO IT BEST - VEHICLE MAI
12/09/2021 STATER BROS - MEETING SUPPLIES
LOCAL MEETINGS STATER BROS - MEETING SUPPLI
12/09/2021 ALAMO RENT A CAR - PD FACILITIES TOUR
CONTRACTUAL SERVICE ALAMO RENTA CAR- PD FACILI
12/09/2021 TESLA - CAR CHARGING
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP TESLA- CAR CHARGING
12/09/2021 DROPBOX - SOFTWARE
SOFTWARE DROPBOX - SOFTWARE
12/09/2021 DROPBOX-SOFTWARE
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 5.44
5.44 0,00 4.30
4.30 0.00 41.52
41.52 0.00 31.88
31.88 0.00 99.33
99.33 0.00 23.65
23.65 0.00 85.60
85.60 0.00 3.09
3.09 0.00 77.54
77.54 0.00 27.72
27.72 0.00 74.91
74.91 0.00 24.72
24.72 0.00 17.75
17.75 0.00 161.59
161.59
0.00 14.98
14.98 0.00 49.53
49.53 0.00 10.23
10.23 0.00 24.90
24.90 0.00 38.63
38.63 0.00 20.99
20.99 0.00 193.34
193.34
0.00 74.79
74.79 168.56
168.56
22.57 22.57
107.84
107.84
105.21
12/13/2021 12;46:26 PM Page 3 of 13
9 Item 1.
Check Report
Vendor Number
24226331286400
24226381307360
24226381311370
24226381314400
24231681288091
24231681300837
24231681302837
24231681314091
74239001302900
24251381307030
74251381308030
24323031307200
24412951292606
24428061302300
24431051293838
24431051295838
74431061314838
24445001293300
24445001294300
24445001296000
24445001297600
24445001302000
24445001303600
24445001304400
24445001312300
24445001313400
Vendor Name
100-1230-7071-0000
Invoice
100-2050-7025.0000
Invoice
100-2050-7025-0000
Invoice
100-0000-2026.0000
Invoice
100-0000-2026-0000
Invoice
100-6050-7090.5999
Invoice
700-4050-7085-0000
Invoice
100-2050-7035-0000
Invoice
100-1550-7040.0000
Invoice
100-2050-7025-0000
Invoice
700-4050-7037-0000
invoice
700.4050-7070-0000
Invoice
100-6000-7085-6040
Invoke
100-0000-2026-0000
Invoice
100-6050-7090-6025
Invoice
700-4050-7090-0000
Invoice
100-6050-7090-5999
Invoice
100.2050-7066-0000
Invoice
100-6050-7090-0000
Invoice
100-6050-7090-0000
Invoice
100-0000-2026-0000
Invoice
100-2050-7037-0000
Invoke
100-2050-7035-0000
Invoice
100-2050-7037-0000
Invoice
700-4050-7085-0000
Invoice
100-6050-7090-5999
Invoice
Date Range; 12/03/2021 -
Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount N
SOFTWARE DROP BOX - SOFTWARE
12/09/2021 WALMART - OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES WALMART - OFFICE SUPPLIES
12/09/2021 WALMART - OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES WALMART- OFFICE SUPPLIES
12/09/2021 SAMS CLUB -
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP SAMS CLUB -
12/09/2021 WALMART -
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP WALMART -
12/09/2021 HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS - EQUIPMENT M
EQUIP SUPPLIES/MAINT- HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS - EQUI
12/09/2021 SMART AND FINAL- BUILDING MAINTEN
BUILDING SUPPLIES/MAI SMART AND FINAL- BUILDING
12/09/2021 ALBERTSON'S - MEETING SUPPLIES
LOCAL MEETINGS ALBERTSON'S - MEETING SUPPL
12/09/2021 HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS - EVENT SUPPUE
RECREATION PROGRAMS HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS -
12/09/2021 CUSTOM TROPHIES - OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES CUSTOM TROPHIES - OFFICE SU
12/09/2021 BMT SAFE & LOCK - VEHICLE MAINTENAN
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BMT SAFE & LOCK - VEHICLE MA
12/09/2021 BMT SAFE & LOCK - DEPT SUPPLIES
SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES BMT SAFE & LOCK - DEPT SUPPL
12/09/2021 RESOURCE BLDG MATERIAL - BUILDING M
BLDG MAINT- POLICE DE RESOURCE BLDG MATERIAL -
12/09/2021 SMITH AND LOVELESS -
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP SMITH AND LOVELESS -
12/09/2021 CHERRY VALLEY NURSERY - EQUIPMENT
EQUIP SUPPLIES/MAINT- CHERRY VALLEY NURSERY- EQU
12/09/2021 NAPA - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES/M NAPA - EQUIPMENT MAINTENA
12/09/2021 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS - EQUIPMENT MAIN
EQUIP SUPPLIES/MAINT- O'REILLY AUTO PARTS - EQUIPM
12/09/2021 HUDSONNEWS -TRAVEL EXPENSE
TRAVEL, EDUCATION, TRA HUDSONNEWS-TRAVELEXPEN
12/09/2021 BIG TEX TRAILERS - EQUIPMENT MAINTE
EQUIP SUPPUES/MAINT BIG TEX TRAILERS - EQUIPMENT
12/09/2021 BIG TEX TRAILERS - EQUIPMENT MAINTE
EQUIP SUPPLIES/MAINT BIG TEX TRAILERS - EQUIPMENT
12/09/2021 DOLLAR TREE -
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP DOLLAR TREE -
12/09/2021 LES SCHWAB TIRES -TIRE DEPOSIT
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE LES SCHWAB TIRES - TIRE DEPOS
12/09/2021 DOLLAR TREE- MEETING SUPPLIES
LOCAL MEETINGS DOLLAR TREE - MEETING SUPPLI
12/09/2021 LES SCHWAB TIRES - VEHICLE MAINTENA
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE LES SCHWAB TIRES -VEHICLE M
12/09/2021 WALMART- BUILDING MAINTENANCE
BUILDING SUPPLIES/MAI WALMART- BUILDING MAINTE
12/09/2021 BIG TEX TRAILERS - EQUIPMENT MAINTE
EQUIP SUPPLIES/MAINT - BIG TEX TRAILERS - EQUIPMENT
12/09/2021 WALMART -
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
105.21
117.45
117.45
193,92
193.92
28.30 28.30
15.86 15.86
67.87 67.87
78.57 78.57
53.85 53.85
43.00 43.00
29.09 29.09
26.81 26,81
10.78 10.78
81.80 81.80
299.29
299.29
127.75
127.75
46.30 46.30
39,85
39.85 17.12
17.12 64.64
64.64 10.73
10.73 36.74
36.74 100.00
100.00
4.31 4.31
308.59
308.59
55.22 55.22
53.88 53.88
32.34 12/13/2021 12:46:26 PM Page 4 of 13
10 Date Range: 12/03/202
Item 1.
21 Check Report
Vendor Number
24483471284373
24483471286000
24483471291441
24483471291492
2449215129371.5
24492151293740
24492151294852
24492151300852
24492151301852
24492151305713
24492151307852
24492151313854
24492161285000
24551941295030
24559301291900
24559301314900
24692161287100
24692161292100
24692161296100
24692161298100
24692161299100
24692161302100
24692161306100
24692161306100
24692161308100
Vendor Name
100-0000-2026-0000
Invoice
100-0000-2026-0000
Invoice
1.00-0000-2026-0000
Invoice
100-0000-2026.0000
Invoice
100-0000-2026.0000
Invoice
100-1050-7035-0000
Invoice
100-1050-7035-0000
100-1200-7035-0000
Invoice
100-2050.7066-0000
Invoice
100-0000-4825-0000
Invoice
100-1240-6050-0000
Invoice
100-1200-7035.0000
Invoice
100-6050-7066-0000
Invoice
100.0000-2026-0000
Invoice
100-1200-7066-0000
Invoice
100-6050-7090-0000
Invoice
100-1225-7066-0000
Invoice
L00-1225-7066-0000
Invoice
100-6000-7085-6025
Invoke
100-1550-7040-0000
Invoice
100-2050-7070.0009
Invoice
100-1200-7030-0000
Invoice
100-2050-7035-0000
Invoice
100-6050-7090-6025
Invoice
700-4050-7070-0000
Invoice
700-4050-7070-0000
Invoice
100-1150-7066-0000
Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP WALMART- 32,34
12/09/2021 TESLA - CAR CHARGING 0.00
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP TESLA - CAR CHARGING
12/09/2021 TESLA - CAR CHARGING 0.00
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP TESLA - CAR CHARGING
12/09/2021 TESLA-CARCHARGING 0.00
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP TESLA - CAR CHARGING
12/09/2021 TESLA - CAR CHARGING 0.00
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP TESLA - CAR CHARGING
12/09/2021 EB 9TH ANNUAL TURNING - IEEP RED CAR 0.00
LOCAL MEETINGS EB 9TH ANNUAL TURNING - IEE
12/09/2021 BMT CHAMBER - MEETING REGISTRATION 0.00
LOCAL MEETINGS BMT CHAMBER- MEETING REGI
LOCAL MEETINGS BMT CHAMBER- MEETING REGI
12/09/2021 MARPA GROUP - EMP TRAINING
TRAVEL, EDUCATION, TRA MARPA GROUP - EMP TRAINING
12/09/2021 PAYPAL - PAMPEREDCHE - ERROR
MISCELLANEOUS REVENU PAYPAL- PAMPEREDCHS- ERRO
12/09/2021 YOUR MEMBER CAREERS - HIRING COSTS
RECRUITMENT AND HIRI YOUR MEMBER CAREERS - HIRI
12/09/2021 ES 9TH ANNUAL TURNING - IEEP RED CAR
LOCAL MEETINGS EB 9TH ANNUALTURNING - IEE
12/09/2021 TECH SCHOOL- EMPLOYEE EDUCATION
TRAVEL, EDUCATION, TRA TECH SCHOOL- EMPLOYEE EDU
12/09/2021 BMT CHAMBER -
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP BMT CHAMBER -
12/09/2021 CALCITIES REGISTRATION - 2022 CITY MA
TRAVEL, EDUCATION, TRA CALCITIES REGISTRATION - 2022
12/09/2021 ALLIANCE TRAILER CORP - EQUIPMENT M
EQUIP SUPPLIES/MAINT ALLIANCE TRAILER CORP - EQUI
12/09/2021 CSMFO - CONFERENCE
TRAVEL, EDUCATION, TRA CSMFO - CONFERENCE
12/09/2021 CSMFO - CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
TRAVEL, EDUCATION, TRA CSMFO - CONFERENCE REGISTR
12/09/2021 HOME DEPOT -BUILDING MAINTENANCE
BLDG MAINT- CITY HALL HOME DEPOT- EQUIPMENT MA
12/09/2021 REDMOON PRINT - EVENT SUPPLIES
RECREATION PROGRAMS REDMOON PRINT- EVENT SUPP
12/09/2021 MICHAELS - DEPARTMENT AWARDS SUPP
SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES MICHAELS - DEPARTMENTAWA
12/09/2021 WALL STREET JOURNAL- MONTHLY SUBS
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS WALL STREET JOURNAL - MONT
12/09/2021 STARBUCKS - CITIZEN ACADEMY SUPPLIES
LOCAL MEETINGS STARBUCKS - CITIZEN ACADEMY
12/09/2021 HOME DEPOT - EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN
EQUIP SUPPLIES/MAINT- HOME DEPOT- EQUIPMENT MA
12/09/2021 HOME DEPOT- DEPT SUPPLIES
SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES HOME DEPOT- DEPT SUPPLIES
12/09/2021 HOME DEPOT - DEPT SUPPLIES
SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES HOME DEPOT- DEPT SUPPLIES
12/09/2021 NNA SERVICES - NOTARY RENEWAL FOR
TRAVEL, EDUCATION, TRA NNA SERVICES - NOTARY RENE
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 15.91
15.91 17.39
17.39 6.66
6.66 11.47
11.47 54.67
54.67 44.00
22,00
22.00 140.00
140.00
121.70
121.70
199.00
199.00
54.67 54.67
103.75
103.75
44.00 44,00
725.00
725.00
13.38 13.38
620.00
620.00
470.00
470.00
100.35
100.35
546.75
546.75
64.12 64.12
4.00 4.00
17.95 17.95
339.09
339.09
80.21 80.21
210.31
210.31
115.00
115.00
12/13/2021 12:46:26 PM Page 5 of 13
11 Check Report
Vendor Number
24692161308100
24692161309100
74692161309100
24692161309100
24707801302030
74755421286132
74755421294282
74755421306273
24755421307273
24755421313643
24755421313643
24755421313643
74755421313643
74755421314163
24793381288000
74793381295000
74793381301000
24793381305393
74793381307000
24793381309000
74793381310000
24793381314000
2479338134000
24801971295726
74801971312091
24801991290018
Vendor Name
Invoice
100-1550-7040.0000
Invoice
100-2050-7035-0000
Invoice
500-0000-7068-0000
Invoice
$00-0000-7068-0000
Invoice
100-1550-7040-0000
Invoice
100-2050-7066-0000
Invoice
700-4050-7037-0000
Invoice
100-6050-7037.0000
Invoice
700-4050-7066-0000
Invoice
700-4050-7022.0000
Invoice
700-4050-7022-0000
Invoice
100-0000-2026.0000
Invoice
100-0000-2026.0000
Invoice
100-2050-7066-0000
Invoice
100-0000-2026-0000
Invoice
100.0000.2026-0000
Invoice
100-0000-2026-0000
Invoice
100-0000-2026-0000
Invoice
100-0000-2026-0000
Invoice
100-0000-2026-0000
Invoice
100-0000-2026-0000
Invoice
100.0000.2026-0000
Invoice
100-0000-2026-0000
Invoice
100-0000-2026-0000
Invoice
100-0000-2026-0000
Invoice
700-4050-7070-0000
Date Range: 12/03/2021 -
Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount N 12/09/2021 REDMOON PRINT- EVENT SUPPLIES 0.00 193.97
RECREATION PROGRAMS REDMOON PRINT EVENTSUPP 193.97
12/09/2021 PANERA BREAD - MEETING SUPPLIES 0.00 27.55
LOCAL MEETINGS PANERA BREAD - MEETING SUP 27.55
12/09/2021 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES - FLIGHT K MENDO 0.00 873.46 CONTRACTUAL SERVICE SOUTHWEST AIRLINES - FLIGHT 873.46
12/09/2021 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES - FLIGHT K MENDO 0.00 332.98 CONTRACTUAL SERVICE SOUTHWEST AIRLINES - FLIGHT 332.98
12/09/2021 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL- EVENT SUP 0.00 308.00 RECREATION PROGRAMS DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL -6 308.00
12/09/2021 ARMITAGETACTICAL - EMP TRAINING 0.00 390.00
TRAVEL, EDUCATION, TRA ARMITAGE TACTICAL - EMP TRAI 390.00 12/09/2021 PLUMBERS DEPOT- VEHICLE MAINTENAN 0.00 196.33 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PLUMBERS DEPOT - VEHICLE M 196.33
12/09/2021 WELDORSSUPPLYANDSTEEL- VEHICLE 0.00 58.72
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE WELDORS SUPPLY AND STEEL- 58.72
12/09/2021 UE1 WATER PROGRAM - EMP TRA1NING 0.00 56.00
TRAVEL, EDUCATION, TRA UEI WATER PROGRAM - EMP TR 56.00 12/09/2021 STATE WATER BOARD - CERTIFICATE RENE 0.00 110.00 LICENSE, PERMITS, FEES STATE WATER BOARD - CERTIFIC 110.00 12/09/2021 OPCSTATEWBFEE- SERVICEFEE 0.00 2.53
LICENSE, PERMITS, FEES OPC STATE WB FEE SERVICE FE 2.53 12/09/2021 CA DIR DOSH - 0.00 450.00
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP CA DIR DOSH - 450.00
12/09/2021 OPC CA DIR DOSH - 0.00 10.35
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP OPC CA DIR DOSH - 10.35
12/09/2021 SIC TAP AND POUR -TRAVEL EXPENSE 0.00 71.62
TRAVEL, EDUCATION, TRA SJC TAP AND POUR -TRAVEL EX 71.62 12/09/2021 TESLA - CAR CHARGING 0.00 18.87
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP TESLA- CAR CHARGING 18.87
12/09/2021 TESLA- CAR CHARGING 0.00 15.54
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP TESLA - CAR CHARGING 15.54
12/09/2021 TESLA- CAR CHARGING 0.00 18.50
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP TESLA - CAR CHARGING 18.50
12/09/2021 TESLA- CAR CHARGING 0.00 7.40
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP TESLA - CAR CHARGING 7.40
12/09/2021 TESLA - CAR CHARGING 0.00 15.96
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP TESLA - CAR CHARGING 15.96
12/09/2021 TESLA - CAR CHARGING 0.00 17.39
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP TESLA - CAR CHARGING 17.39
12/09/2021 TESLA - CAR CHARGING 0.00 14.43
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP TESLA - CAR CHARGING 14.43
12/09/2021 TESLA- CAR CHARGING 0.00 3.70
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP TESLA-CARCHARGING 3.70
12/09/2021 TELSA-CARCHARGING 0.00 6.29
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP TELSA- CAR CHARGING 6.29
12/09/2021 SIGNS.COM - 0.00 278.57
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP SIGNS.COM - 278.57
12/09/2021 TRANS/AIR MANUFACTURING - 0.00 206.63
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUSP TRANS/AIR MANUFACTURING - 206.63
12/09/2021 HACH COMPANY- DEPT SUPPLIES 0.00 325.64
SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES HACH COMPANY- DEPT SUPPLI 325.64
Item 1.
12/13/2021 12:46:26 PM Page 6 of 13
12 Check Report
Vendor Number
24906411302133
24941351314826
24943011287010
24943011288010
74943011292010
24943011294010
74943011294010
24943011294010
74943011295010
24943011295010
24943011300010
74943011302010
74943011303010
24943011303010
74943011307010
24943011308010
2494301130901Q
24943011310010
24943011310010
24943011313010
74007031308910
74692161309100
74692161309100
74692161309100
74692161309100
74692161309100
Vendor Name
Invoice
100-1225-7066-0000
Invoice
500-0000-7068-0000
Invoice
700-4050-7070-0000
Invoice
700-4050-7070-0000
Invoice
100-6000-7085-6025
Invoice
100-3250-7070-0000
Invoice
100-6050-7090-5999
Invoice
100-6050-7090-5999
Invoice
100-3100-7070.0000
lnvolce
100-3250-7070.0000
Invoice
700-4050-7070-0000
Invoice
100-3250-7070.0000
Invoice
100-6050-7090-5750
Invoice
100-6050-7090.6025
Invoice
100-6000-7085-6025
Invoice
700-4050-7070-0000
Invoice
100-6000-7085-6041
Invoice
100-6050.7090-6025
Invoice
7Q0.4050-7037-0000
Invoice
100-6050-7090-5999
Invoice
100-1550-7040-0000
Credit Memo
500-0000-7068.0000
Credit Memo
500-0000-7068-0000
Credit Memo
500-0000-7068-0000
Credit Memo
500.0000-7068-0000
Credit Memo
500-0000-7068-0000
Date Range: 12/03/2021 -
Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount N 12/09/2021 FRED PRYOR- EMPLOYEE TRAINING 0.00 149.00
TRAVEL, EDUCATION, TRA FRED PRYOR - EMPLOYEE TRAIN 149.00 12/09/2021 BUDGET RENT CAR - PD FACILITIESTOU 0.00 226.08 CONTRACTUAL SERVICE BUDGET RENTA CAR - PDFACILI 226.08
12/09/2021 HOME DEPOT- DEPT SUPPLIES 0.00 34.04
SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES HOME DEPOT - DEPT SUPPLIES 34.04
12/09/2021 HOME DEPOT - DEPT SUPPLIES 0.00 50,71
SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES HOME DEPOT - DEPTSUPPLEIS 50.71
12/09/2021 HOME DEPOT - BUILDING MAINTENANCE 0.00 75.62 BLDG MAINT - CITY HALL HOME DEPOT - BUILDING MAIN 75.62 12/09/2021 HOME DEPOT- DEPT SUPPLIES 0.00 51.40
SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES HOME DEPOT - DEPT SUPPLIES 51.40
12/09/2021 HOME DEPOT- EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN 0.00 32.29
EQUIP SUPPUES/MAINT - HOME DEPOT - EQUIPMENT MA 32.29
12/09/2021 HOME DEPOT - EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN 0.00 64.46
EQUIP SUPPLIES/MAINT- HOME DEPOT- EQUIPMENT MA 64.46
12/09/2021 HOME DEPOT - DEPT SUPPLIES 0.00 43.07
SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES HOME DEPOT- DEPT SUPPLIES 43.07
12/09/2021 HOME DEPOT - DEPT SUPPLIES 0.00 25.80
SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES HOME DEPOT- DEPT SUPPLIES 25.80
12/09/2021 HOME DEPOT- DEPT SUPPLIES 0.00 37.83
SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES HOME DEPOT - DEPT SUPPLIES 37.83
12/09/2021 HOME DEPOT- DEPT SUPPLIES 0.00 25.49
SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES HOME DEPOT - DEPT SUPPLIES 25.49
12/09/2021 HOME DEPOT - EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN 0.00 16.79
EQUIP SUPPLIES/MAINT- HOME DEPOT- EQUIPMENT MA 16.79
12/09/2021 HOME DEPOT - EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN 0.00 21.52
EQUIP SUPPLIES/MAINT - HOME DEPOT - EQUIPMENT MA 21.52
12/09/2021 HOME DEPOT- BUILDING MAINTENANCE 0.00 15.06
BLDG MAINT- CITY HALL HOME DEPOT - BUILDING MAIN 15.06
12/09/2021 HOME DEPOT - DEPT SUPPLIES 0.00 16.32
SPECIAL DEPTSUPPLIES HOME DEPOT- DEPT SUPPLIES 16.32
12/09/2021 HOME DEPOT - BUILDING MAINTENANCE 0.00 14.41 BLDG MAINT - POLICE AN HOME DEPOT - BUILDING MAIN 14.41 12/09/2021 HOME DEPOT - EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN 0.00 187.24 EQUIP SUPPLIES/MAINT - HOME DEPOT - EQUIPMENT MA 187.24 12/09/2021 HOME DEPOT- VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0.00 21.52
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE HOME DEPOT - VEHICLE MAINT 21.52
12/09/2021 HOME DEPOT - EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN 0.00 64.55
EQUIP SUPPLIES/MAINT- HOME DEPOT- EQUIPMENT MA 64.55
12/09/2021 DHGATE REDHILL- EVENT SUPPLIES 0.00 583.34
RECREATION PROGRAMS DHGATE REDHILL- EVENTSUPP 583.34
12/09/2021 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES - CANCELLEDFLIG 0.00 -148.98 CONTRACTUAL SERVICE SOUTHWEST AIRLINES -CANCEL -148.98
12/09/2021 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES - CANCELLED FLIG 0.00 -148.98 CONTRACTUAL SERVICE SOUTHWEST AIRLINES - CANCEL -148.98 12/09/2021 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES - CANCELLEDFLIG 0.00 -148.98 CONTRACTUAL SERVICE SOUTHWEST AIRLINES -CANCEL -148.98
12/09/2021 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES - CANCELLED FLIG 0.00 -148.98 CONTRACTUAL SERVICE SOUTHWEST AIRLINES - CANCEL -148.98 12/09/2021 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES -CANCELLED FLIG 0.00 -299.98 CONTRACTUAL SERVICE SOUTHWEST AIRLINES -CANCEL -299.98
Item 1.
12/13/2021 12:46:26 PM Page 7 of 13
13 Check Report
Vendor Number
74692161309100
74692161313100
74692161313100
74692161313100
74793381287680
4447
Payable #
jNV0000398
4448
Payable #
JNV0000397
4450
Payable #
JNV0000400
4449
Payable #
iNV0000399
1160
Payable #
6589
3068
Payable
DECEMBER 2021
1273
Payable #
12/10/21
4389
Vendor Name
Credit Memo
500-0000-7068-0000
Credit Memo
500-0000-7068-0000
Credit Memo
500-0000-7068-0000
Credit Memo
500.0000-7068-0000
Credit Memo
100-2050-7066-0000
**Void**
**Vold**
**Void**
**Void**
**Vold**
Alameda County DCSS
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100-0000-2105.OQ00
CA State Disbursement Unit
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100-0000-2105-0000
Riverside County Sheriff
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100.0000.2105-0000
State Of California FTB
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100-0000-2105-0000
BIG TIME DESIGN
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
240-2300-7096-0000
BRIAN FORD
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100-0000-1520-0000
CHRISTOPHER CREWS
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
240-2310-7096-0000
CYNTHIA GAMACHE
Date Range: 12/03/202
Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount 12/09/2021 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES - CANCELLED FLIG
CONTRACTUAL SERVICE SOUTHWEST AIRLINES -CANCEL
12/09/2021 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES -CANCELLED FLIG
CONTRACTUAL SERVICE SOUTHWEST AIRLINES -
12/09/2021 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES -CANCELLED FLIG
CONTRACTUAL SERVICE SOUTHWEST AIRLINES -CANCEL
12/09/2021 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES -CANCELLED RIG
CONTRACTUAL SERVICE SOUTHWEST AIRLINES -CANCEL
12/09/2021 GET SAFE USA- EMP TRAINING
TRAVEL, EDUCATION, TRA GET SAFE USA - EMP TRAINING
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 12/10/2021 EFT 0.00
12/10/2021 EFT 0.00
12/10/2021 EFT 0.00
12/10/2021 EFT 0.00
12/10/2021 EFT 0.00
12/03/2021 Regular 0.00
Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount
12/03/2021 Tyser Garnishment/ Child Support 200000 0.00 619.38 PAYROLL SUSPENSE Tyser Garnishment/ Child Suppo 61938
-299.98
-299.98
-148.98
-148.98
-148.98
-148.98
-299.98
-299.98
-150.00
-150.00
12/03/2021 Regular
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name
12/03/2021
PAYROLL SUSPENSE
Item Description
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 619.38
539
540
541
542
543
110870
0.00 276.92 110871
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 276.92
276.92
12/03/2021 Regular 0.00 113.87 110872
Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount
12/03/2021 0.00 113.87
PAYROLL SUSPENSE 113.87
12/03/2021 Regular
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name Item Description
12/03/2021
PAYROLL SUSPENSE
12/10/2021 Regular
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name item Description
12/10/2021 SHOP WITH A COP TSHIRTS
PROGRAM COSTS - SHOP SHOP WITH A COP TSHIRTS
0.00 150.00 110873
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 150.00
150.00
0.00 202.57
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0,00
202.57
202.57
110874
12/10/2021 Regular 0.00 4,190,00 110875
Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount
12/10/2021 PREPAID PERS RETIREMENT 0.00 4,190.00
DUE FROM PERS PREPAID PERS RETIREMENT 4,190.00
12/10/2021 Regular 0.00 229.51 110876
Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount
12/10/2021 BIG TIME DESIGN #6425 - EXPLORER SIAM 0.00 229.51 PROGRAM COSTS - EXPLO BIG TIME DESIGN #6425 - EXPI. 229.51 12/10/2021 Regular
0.00 481.60 110877
12/13/2021 12:46:26 PM Page 8 of 13
14 Check Report
Vendor Number
Payable #
006
Vendor Name
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100-1550-7040-0000
0� Invoice
100-1550-7040-0000
4458
Payable #
001
DIANA T BENHAR
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100-1550-7040-0000
002 Invoice
100-1550-7040-0000
4492
Payable #
21462
1638
Payable #
2334
4452
Payable #
002
4399
Payable #
004
3310
Payable #
11/18/2021
1979
Payable #
INV0000367
1979
DIRECT 4 BIZ, LLC
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100-1230-7010-000Q
HOWARD'S
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
1.00-6050-7156-0000
JULIA STOCKMAN
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100-1550-7040-0000
Invoice
100-1550-7040-0000
KRISTEN R VANDERPOOL
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
10q.1550-7040-0000
UNITED WINDOW TINT
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100-2050-7037-0000
MUTUAL OF OMAHA
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
,100.0000-2075-0000
MUTUAL OF OMAHA
Date Range: 12/03/2021 -
Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount N Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount
12/10/2021 YOGA CLASSES OCTOBER 2021 0.00 229.60
RECREATION PROGRAMS YOGA CLASSES OCTOBER 2021 229.60
12/10/2021 YOGA CLASSES NOVEMBER 2021
RECREATION PROGRAMS YOGA CLASSES NOVEMBER 202
0.00 252.00
252.00
Item 1.
12/10/2021 Regular 0.00 241.50 110878
Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount
12/10/2021 ZUMBA CLASSES OCTOBER 2021 0.00 101.50
RECREATION PROGRAMS ZUMBA CLASSES OCTOBER 2021 101.50
12/10/2021 ZUMBA CLASSES NOVEMBER 2021
RECREATION PROGRAMS ZUMBA CLASSES NOVEMBER 20
12/10/2021 Regular
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name Item Description
12/10/2021 DIRECT COMMERCIAL INSTALLATION
UTILITIES DIRECT COMMERCIAL INSTALLA
12/10/2021 Regular
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name Item Description
12/10/2021 WEED ABATEMENT
WEED ABATEMENT WEED ABATEMENT
Post Date
12/10/2021 Regular
0.00 140.00
140.00
0.00 812.70 110879
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 812.70
812.70
0.00 4,125.00 110880
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 4,125.00
4,125.00
0.00 595.00 110881
Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount
Account Name Item Description
12/10/2021 BALLET CLASSES OCTOBER 2021
RECREATION PROGRAMS BALLET CLASSES OCTOBER 2021
12/10/2021 BALLET CLASSES NOVEMBER 2021
RECREATION PROGRAMS BALLET CLASSES NOVEMBER 20
Distribution Amount
0.00 0.00
280.00
280.00
315.00
315.00
12/10/2021 Regular 0.00 157.50 110882
Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount
12/10/2021 COOKIE DECORATING CLASS 0.00 157.50
RECREATION PROGRAMS COOKIE DECORATING CLASS 157.50
12/10/2021 Regular 0.00 380.00 110883
Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount
12/10/2021 WINDOW TINT FOR PD TESLA MODEL 3 0.00 380.00 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE WINDOW TINT FOR PD TESLA M 380.00
12/03/2021 Bank Draft 0.00 525.72
Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount
12/03/2021 457 RETIREMENT CATCHUP 0.00 525.72
DEFERRED COMPENSATI 457 RETIREMENT CATCHUP 525.72
12/03/2021 Bank Draft
DFT0003394
0.00 2,097.97 DFT0003395
12/13/2021 12:46:26 PM Page 9 of 13
15 Check Report
Vendor Number
Payable #
JNV0000373
1979
Payable #
JNV0000374
1979
Payable #
INV0000375
1979
Payable #
JNV0000376
1979
Payable #
INV0000377
1979
Payable if
JNV0000378
1979
Payable #
INV0000379
1979
Payable #
JNY0000381
1979
Payable #
1NV0000382
1979
Vendor Name
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100-1200-6018-0000
100-2050-6018-0000
100-6050-6018-0000
700-4050-6018-0000
750-7400-6018-000Q
MUTUAL OF OMAHA
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100-0000-2075-0000
MUTUAL OF OMAHA
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100-0000-2075-0000
MUTUAL OF OMAHA
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100.0000.2075-0000
MUTUAL OF OMAHA
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100-0000-2075-0000
MUTUAL OF OMAHA
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100.0000-2075-0000
MUTUAL OF OMAHA
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100-0000-2075-0000
MUTUAL OF OMAHA
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
1,00-0000-7132-0000
MUTUAL OF OMAHA
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
j0D-0000-2132-0000
MUTUAL OF OMAHA
Post Date
Payment Date Payment Type
Payable Description
Account Name
12/03/2021 DEFERRED MEMO
OTHER COMPENSATION
OTHER COMPENSATION
OTHER COMPENSATION
OTHER COMPENSATION
OTHER COMPENSATION
Item Description
DEFERRED MEMO
DEFERRED MEMO
DEFERRED MEMO
DEFERRED MEMO
DEFERRED MEMO
12/03/2021 Bank Draft
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name Item Description
12/03/2021 DEFERRED COMP LOAN 401A-1
DEFERRED COMPENSATI DEFERRED COMP LOAN
12/03/2021 Bank Draft
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name Item Description
12/03/2021 DEFERRED COMP LOAN 401A-2
DEFERRED COMPENSATI DEFERRED COMP LOAN 401A-2
12/03/2021 Bank Draft
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name Item Description
12/03/2021 DEFERRED COMP 457
DEFERRED COMPENSATI DEFERRED COMP 457
12/03/2021 Bank Draft
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name Item Description
12/03/2021 DEFERRED COMP 457
DEFERRED COMPENSATI DEFERRED COMP 457
12/03/2021 Bank Draft
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name Item Description
12/03/2021 DEFERRED COMP 457 - LOAN REPAY
DEFERRED COMPENSATI DEFERRED COMP 457 - LOAN RE
12/03/2021 Bank Draft
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name Item Description
12/03/2021 DEFERRED COMP 457 - LOAN REPAY - 2
DEFERRED COMPENSATI DEFERRED COMP 457 - LOAN RE
12/03/2021 Bank Draft
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name Item Description
12/03/2021 FICA PT REMAINDER
P.A.R.S. WITHHOLDING FICA PT REMAINDER
12/03/2021 Bank Draft
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name Item Description
12/03/2021 PICA PT REMAINDER
P.A.R.S. WITHHOLDING FICA PT REMAINDER
12/03/2021 Bank Draft
Date Range: 12/03/202
Discount Amount Payment Amount
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 2,097.97
299.71
599.42
299.71
599.42
299.71
Item 1.
21 0.00 1457.35 DFT0003396
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 1,157.35
401A-1 1,157.35
0.00 451.43 0FT0003397
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 451.43
451.43
0.00 8,518.49 DFT0003398
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 8,518.49
8,518.49
0.00 10,443.23 DFT0003399
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 10,443.23
10,443.23
0.00 2,536.79 DFT0003400
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0,00 2,536.79
2,536.79
0.00 2,718.32 DFT0003401
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 2,718.32
2,718.32
0.00 237.94 DFT0003403
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 237.94
237.94
0.00 178.79 DFT0003404
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 178.79
178.79
0.00 411.08 DFT0003405
12/13/2021 12:46:26 PM Page 10 of 13
16 Check Report
Vendor Number
Payable #
'NV0000383
2594
Payable #
JNV0000392
2594
Payable #
JNV0000396
Vendor Name
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100-0000-2132.0000
CAL PERS
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100-0000-2130.0000
CAL PERS
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100-0000-2130-0000
100-0000-2130-0000
100-0000.2130.0000
100-0000-2130.0000
100-0000-2130-0000
100-0000-2130-0000
100-0000-2130-0000
100-0000-2130.0000
100-0000-2130-0000
700-0000-2130-0000
700-0000-2130-0000
700-0000-2130-0000
700-0000-2130-0000
750.0000-2130-0000
750.0000-2130-0000
750-0000-2130-0000
750-0000-2130-0000
Date Range: 12/03/2021 -
Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount N Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount
12/03/2021 FICA PT RETIREMENT 0.00 411.08
P.A.R.S. WITHHOLDING FICA PT RETIREMENT 411.08
12/03/2021 Bank Draft
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name
12/03/2021 SERVICE CREDIT
P.E.R.S. LIABILITY SERVICE CREDIT
Item Description
12/03/2021 Bank Draft
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name
12/03/2021 CALPERS
P.E.R.S. LIABILITY
P.E.R.S. LIABILITY
P.E.R.S. LIABILITY
P.E.R.S. LIABILITY
P.E.R.S. LIABILITY
P.E.R.S. LIABILITY
P.E.R.S. LIABILITY
P.E.R.S. LIABILITY
P.E.R.S. LIABILITY
P.E.R.S. LIABILITY
P.E.R.S. LIABILITY
P.E.R.S. LIABILITY
P.E.R.S. LIABILITY
P.E.R.S. LIABILITY
P.E.R.S. LIABILITY
P.E.R.S. LIABILITY
P.E.R.S. LIABILITY
Payment Type
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Bank Drafts
EFT's
Virtual Payments
Item Description
CALPERS CLASSIC EE
CALPERS SAFETY - ER
CALPERS PEPRA SAFETY- ER
CALPERS PEPRA SAFETY - EE
CALPERS PEPRA- EE
CALPERS PEPRA- ER
CALPERS CLASSIC ER
CALPERS SAFETY -- EE
CALPERS SURVIVOR RATE
CALPERS PEPRA- EE
CALPERS PEPRA - ER
CALPERS CLASSIC ER
CALPERS CLASSIC EE
CALPERS PEPRA - ER
CALPERS CLASSIC ER
CALPERS CLASSIC EE
CALPERS PEPRA - EE
Rank Code APBNKSummary
Payable Payment
Count Count
17 0
0 13
159
0 14
0 0
13 6
0 Discount
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Item 1.
0,00 356.26 DFT0003407
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 356.26
356.26
0.00 126,257.49 DFT0003410
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 126,257.49
11,162.97
33, 883.34
7,786.19
8,103.25
6,188.72
6,958.87
21,279.29
12, 619.16
44.64 690.51
776.44
5,772.19
3,028.01
1,588.92
3,254.58
1,707.33
1,413.08
Payment
12,575.55
0.00 0.00
155,890.86
13,225.33
0.00 189 33 0.00 181,691.74
12/13/2021 12:46:26 PM Page 11 of 13
17 Check Report
Vendor Number Vendor Name
Bank Code: PYBANK-BANK OF HEMET - PAYROLL FED/STATE DEPOSITS 4446
Payable #
)NV00004O.
4445
Payable #
JNV00004O2
California State Payroll Taxes
Payable Type
Account Number
invoice
100-0000.2105-0000
Federal Deposit
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100.0000.2105-0000
100.0000-2105-0000
Payment Date Payment Type
12/03/2021 Hank Draft
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name Item Description
12/03/2021 State Withholding
PAYROLL SUSPENSE State Withholding
12/03/2021 Bank Draft
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name Item Description
12/03/2021 Federal Deposit
PAYROLL SUSPENSE Federal Withholding
PAYROLL SUSPENSE Medicare
Payment Type
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Bank Drafts
EFT's
Virtual Payments
Bank Code PYBANK Summary
Payable
Count
0 0
0 2
0 0
Payment
Count
0 0
0 2
0 0
Discount
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Date Range: 12/03/202
Discount Amount Payment Amount
0.00 24,588.89 DFT0003411
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 24,588.89
24,588.89
0.00 78,488.81 DFT0003412
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 78,488.81
60,412.28
18,076.53
Payment
0.00 0.00
0.00 103,077.70
0.00 0.00
2 2 0.00 103,077.70
12/13/2021 12:46:26 PM
18 Check Report
All Bank Codes Check Summary.
Payable Payment
Payment Type Count Count Discount Payment
Regular Checks 17 14 0.00 12,575.55
Manual. Checks 0 • 0 0.00 0,00
Voided Checks 0 0 0.00 0,00
Bank Drafts 15 15 0.00 258,968.56
EFT's 159 6 0.00 13,225.33
191 35 0.00 284,769.44
Fund. Summary
Fund Name Period Amount
999 POOLED CASH 12/2021 284,769.44
284,769.44
Date Range: 12/03/2021
12/13/2021 12:46:26 PM Page 13 of'113
BEAUMONT
---C J all OM M111�
Vendor Number
Payable #
Bank Code: APBNK-AP
4260
13216
18217
1023
497954
1034
2021-4012
1033
202565
207251
1050
11W3-DV4C-H W
141K-K67R-6F7c
1469-73CV-6YVV
14L7-JLF9-QK71
166X-NW3X-XM9
160C-R6HK-RH43
1F0.1-MPXM-KN9
1KHQ-47CY-7MR
1VJ0-H 13 P-7107
1X1L-V1W7-QW
1Y6P-JGJV-VH7N
1YGP-TXHC-DKK
1YTQ-XTP3-H64K
1053
75233
75287
1067
181286
3831
622884
649180
649927
Check Re
City of Beaumont, CA Packet: APPKT01976 - 20211210 JM AP AU Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type
Payable Type Payable Date Payable Description
Bank
10-8 RETROFIT INC 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice
Invoice
11/24/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
11/16/2021 Equipment Outfitting of New ACO Truck
ADVANCED WORKPLACE STRATEGIE 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/27/2021 EMPLOYEE MEDICALSERVICES
ALADTEC, INC
Invoice
AL'S KUBOTATRACTOR
Invoice
Invoice
12/13/2021
12/01/2021 SOFTWARE
12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
03/26/2021 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
05/17/2021 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
Virtual Pay
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/30/2021 OFFICE SUPPLIES
Invoice 12/01/2021 OFFICE SUPPLIES
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoke
Invoice
Invoice
11/28/2021
11/11/2021
11/28/2021
11/29/2021
10/10/2021
11/19/2021
11/19/2021
12/03/2021
11/06/2021
11/05/2021
11/30/2021
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
DEPT SUPPLIES
DEPT SUPPLIES
DEPT SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/22/2021 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Invoice 12/06/2021 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/28/2021 ANIMAL CARE SERVICES
ANIMAL PEST MANAGEMENT SERVI 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/30/2021 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Invoice 11/30/2021 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Invoice 11/30/2021 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3661 ARROWHEAD GROUP INC
32259
1100
2882945169
2882949183
4388
51NV106068
1125
1140
75434
Invoice
AUTOZONE
Invoice
Involce-
BABCOCK LABORATORIES,
Invoice
BEAUMONT CHAMBER
Invoice
12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
11/10/2021 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
11/29/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
12/03/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
INC 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
11/01/2021 WWTP - ANALYTICAL SERVICES
12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
11/29/2021 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
BEAUMONT SAFE & LOCK 12/13/2021
Invoice 11/23/2021 DEPT SUPPLIES
Virtual Pay
By Check Number
Discount Amount Payment Amount Number
Discount Amount Payable Amount
0.00 0.00
0.00 0,00
0.00 286.00
0.00 373.58
0.00 373.58
0.00 1,776.46
0.00 1,679.44
0.00 97.02
0.00 3,382.70
0.00 97.35
0.00 221.68
0.00 127.14
0.00 1,449.28
0,00 163.78
0.00 272.52
0.00 406.67
0.00 7.53
0.00 7.53
0.00 129.24
0.00 313.58
0.00 132.60
0.00 53.80
0.00 121.14
0.00 60.57
0.00 60.57
0.00 350.00
0.00 350.00
0.00 1,187.50
0.00 685,00
0.00 275.00
0.00 227.50
0.00 0.00 50,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 5,658.23 APA000013.
2,741.59
2,916.64
286.00 APA000014
APA000015
APA000016
APA000017
APA000015
APA000019
APA000020
50.00 APA000021
117.64 APA000022
100.95
16.69 0.00 10.00
0.00 10.00
0.00 300.00
0.00 300.00
0.00 376.77
0.00 376,77
APA000023
APA000024
APA000025
12/13/2021 11:34:31 AM
20 Check Register
Vendor Number
Payable ti
3602
12022021-1
Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type
Payable Type Payable Date Payable Description
BURRTEC WASTE GROUP, INC 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/30/2021 SLUDGE HAULING SERVICES
3993 CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION FOR COC 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay 2022-0268 Invoice 12/09/2021 2022 PUBLIC OPERATORS MEMBERSHIP 3829 CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAI 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay 200011507 Invoke 12/02/2021 VIRTUAL CONFERENCE
3780
139008
139309
139314
1238
N278642
1299
449830
4441
21-1343
4209
37166
2167
A0000674
1353
Q02503
3905
0Q34963
1237
113
CDCE INCORPORATED
Invoice
Invoice
Invoke
12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
09/14/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
11/23/2021 SOFTWARE FOR PD VEHICLES
11/29/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/08/2021 SOFTWARE
CLEAN TECH ENVIRONMENTAL 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/04/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
CLEANING SYSTEM SPECIALIST, INC 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 10/29/2021 Pressure Washer_Graffiti Rig
COMMERCIAL CLEANING SOLUTION 12/13/2021
Invoice
12/01/2021 Janitorial Services
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DEPARTMEN 12/13/2021
Invoice 11/02/2021 DFA FOR RABIES
Virtual Pay
Virtual Pay
CUSTOM TROPHIES 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/30/2021 DEPT SUPPLIES
DANIELGARCIA MONTOYA 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoke 11/24/2021 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
DANIEL WILLIAM DOPP
Invoice
Invoice
12/13/2021
11/13/2021 DEPT SUPPLIES
11/17/2021 EMERGENCY SERVICES
Virtual Pay
3290 DATAXTELINC 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
4483 Invoice 11/27/2021 DATA CABLE AND BOX INSTALLATION 1422 DICK'S ALL AUTO REPAIR, INC 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay 25913 Invoke 11/29/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
25916 Invoice 11/30/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
1424
035168908X2111
035168915X2111
051553389X2111
1495
161667
1499
183105b
1501
851987
2588
79502
79535
79574
1518
DIRECTV
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
EVANS-HYDRO, INC
Invoice
EVIDENT
Invoice
FAIRVIEW FORD
Invoice
FAST LUBEAND TUNE
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
FLYERS ENERGY
12/13/2021
11/26/2021 BUILDING UTILITY
11/26/2021 BUILDING UTILITY
11/26/2021 BUILDING UTILITY
Virtual Pay
12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
10/07/2021 FOUR SEASONS PUMP REPAIR
12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
11/19/2021 DEPT SUPPLIES
12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
11/17/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
11/16/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
11/17/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
11/18/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Packet: APPKT01976-2021121011V1 AP
Discount Amount Payment Amount
Discount Amount Payable Amount
0.00 36,097.25 APA000026
0.00 36,097.25
Item 1.
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 560.00 APA000027
560.00
350.00 APA000028
350.00
4,254.06 APA000029
207.36
3,937.50
109.20
197.07 APA000030
197.07
152.45 APA000031
152.45
16,080.40 APA000032
16,080.40
16,415.00 APA000033
16,415.00
50.00 62.49
16.00 50.00 APA000034
62.49 APA000035
16.00 APA000036
555.00 APA000037
265.00
290.00
5,864.08 APA000038
5,864.08
103.50 APA000039
51.75 51.75
219.62 APA000040
65.69 88.24
65.69 0.00 36,820.90 APA000041
36,820.90
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 153.00 APA000042
153.00
156.06 APA000043
156.06
269.97 APA000044
89.99 89.99
89.99 0.00 3,608.47 APA000045
12/13/2021 11:34:31 AM Page 2 of 7
21 Check Register
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Payable # Payable Type Payable Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 21-410688 Invoice 10/21/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0.00 939.66 21-412359 Invoice 10/25/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0.00 899.78 CFS-2797775 Invoice 10/31/2021 FUEL EXPENSE 0.00 1,039.41 CFS-2825831 Invoice 11/21/2021 FUEL EXPENSE 0.00 729.62 4451 FOXSTER OPCO, LLC 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay 0.00 12,410.00 APA000046 CINV-011620 Invoice 11/0512021 Paratransit Scheduling Software 0.00 9,360.00 1NV-08661 Invoice 10/08/2021 ParatransitScheduling Software 0.00 3,050.00 1553 GALLS INC. 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay 0,00 216.61 APA000047 BC1493805 Invoice 11/23/2021 EMPLOYEE UNIFORMS 0.00 216.61 4438 GUSTAVO RUELLA 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay 0.00 75.00 APA000048 2046 Invoice 11/29/2021 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0.00 75.00 Packet: APPKT01976-20211210 JM AP A
4181 HASA, INC 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay 0.00 1,975.14 APA000049 789745 Invoice 11/29/2021 CHEMICALS 0.00 1,975.14
3515 HD SUPPLY FACILITIES MAINTENANI 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay 0.00 1,462.74 APA000050 768499 Invoice 10/22/2021 WWTP DEPT SUPPLIES 0.00 1,462.74 3572 HECTORALVARADO 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay 0.00 3,560.00 APA000051 1679 Invoice 11/12/2021 Bus Wash and Detail 0.00 1,730.00 1684 Invoice 11/26/2021 Bus Wash and Detail 0.00 1,830.00 1628 HINDERLITER, de LLAMAS, & ASSOC 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay 0.00 2,947.92 APA000052 0913072 Invoice 11/23/2021 AUDIT SERVICES - SALES TAX 0.00 2,947.92 3221 HUBER TECHNOLOGY, INC 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay 0.00 77,211.41 APA000053 C010022153 Invoice 11/17/2021 HIGH PRESSURE SPRAY SYSTEM & REPAIR 0.00 77,211.41 1643 HUNTINGTON COURT REPORTERS & 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay 0.00 617.86 APAOD0054 34155 Invoice 12/03/2021 Huntington Transcription Servcies for FY 2 0.00 617.86 1657 IN GEAR TECHNOLOGY 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay 0.00 445.75 APA000055 11/30/21 Invoice 11/30/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0.00 445.75 1856 LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay 0.00 171.70 APA000056 1535776.202111 Invoice 11/30/2021 MONTHLY SUBSCRIPTION 0.00 171.70 1857 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay 0.00 267.50 APA000057 207395 Invoice 10/31/2021 SEIU NEGOTIATIONS 2020 0.00 234.00 207435 invoice 10/31/2021 SEIU SALARY GRIEVANCE 0.00 33.50 3683 MASTER'S COFFEE AND WATER 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay 0.00 79.90 APA000058 0000000357950 Invoice 11/22/2021 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 79.90 4493 MICHAEL MCGRAW 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay 0.00 20.00 APA000059 RCT R01202921 Invoice 12/01/2021 REFUND FOR 1 HOUR OF STAFF TIME 0.00 20.00 1965 MORITZ EMBROIDERY WORKS 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay 0.00 148.80 APA00006U 245564 Invoice 12/02/2021 EMPLOYEE UNIFORMS 0.00 148,80 3186 MWH CONSTRUCTORS INC 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay 0.00 30,507.03 APA000061 21-30505107.26 Invoice 11/16/2021 BRINE LINE INSTALLATION CONSTRUCTIO 0.00 30,507.03 1980 MYERSTIRESUPPLY 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay 0.00 183.54 APA000062 11456119 Invoice 10/28/2021 DEPT SUPPLIES 0.00 183.54
1984 NAPA AUTO PARTS 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay 0.00 2,385.23 APA000063 266564 Invoice 11/04/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0.00 268.30 166894 Invoice 11/09/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0.00 1,574.73 167815 Invoice 11/22/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0.00 84.95 167979 Invoice 11/24/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0.00 32.31 168049 Invoice 11/24/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0.00 231.11 168358 Invoice 12/01/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0.00 140.53 12/13/2021 11:34:31 AM Page 3 of 7
1 L22
4 -
Check Register
Vendor Number
Payable #
168366
168367
168382
168411
168494
4180
005 BMNT 12/02
3538
680552
680553
681253
1317
73313699
73391498
7353358$
J23 0943717048
2009
2678-393589
2678-394937
2678-396523
2678-396590
2678-397871
2678•,397900
2678-398008
2678-398013
2678.398293
2678-399052
2678-399083
2678-399632
2678.399846
2678-399852
4170
211588
2039
2030207916
203020$192
2030208194
2030208201
2072
1596932
3455
;0148
10299
;0434
3652
23208745
23211942
23243567
23243606
23243622
23243632
23247705
232.47740
23247755
Vendor Name
Payable Type
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Credit Memo
Credit Memo
NOELGOETZ
Invoice 12/02/2021 PROFESSIONAL SERVCES
Payment Date Payment Type
Payable Date
12/01/2021
12/01/2021
12/01/2021
12/09/2021
12/09/2021
Payable Description
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
NUCKLES OIL COMPANY INC 12/13/2021
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
11/23/2021 FUEL EXPENSE
11/23/2021 FUEL EXPENSE
11/23/2021 FUEL EXPENSE
Virtual Pay
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
O'REILLY AUTO PARTS
Credit Memo
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Credit Memo
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoke
11/05/2021
11/11/2021
11/19/2021
10/14/2021
HIRING COSTS
HIRING COSTS
HIRING COSTS
EMPLOYEE MEDICAL SERVICES
12/13/2021
11/04/2021
11/10/2021
11/17/2021
11/17/2021
11/23/2021
11/23/2021
11/23/2021
11/23/2021
11/24/2021
11/29/2021
11/29/2021
12/01/2021
12/02/2021
12/02/2021
Virtual Pay
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
PACIFIC STAR CHEMICAL, LLC 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/30/2021 Chemical Supplies for WWTP
PARKHOUSE TIRE, INC.
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
11/16/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
11/29/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
11/29/2021 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
12/01/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
POLYDYNE, INC. 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/30/2021 CHEMICALS & SUPPLIES
PRISTINE UNIFORMS, LLC 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 06/30/2021 EMPLOYEE UNIFORMS
Invoice 08/06/2021 EMPLOYEE UNIFORMS
Invoice 09/03/2021 EMPLOYEE UNIFORM
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
invoice 09/08/2021 WW - Prudential Uniforms
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
09/15/2021
11/24/2021
11/24/2021
11/24/2021
11/24/2021
12/01/2021
12/01/2021
12/01/2021
WW - Prudential Uniforms
Uniform Rental and Cleaning
Uniform Rental and Cleaning
Uniform Rental and Cleaning
WW - Prudential Uniforms
Uniform Rental and Cleaning
Uniform Rental and Cleaning
Uniform Rental and Cleaning
Packet: APPKT01976-20211210 JM AP Al
Discount Amount Payment Amount N
Discount Amount
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 Payable Amount
162.61
18.30 17.23
-140.53
-4.31
Item 1.
0.00 929.16 APA000064
0.00 929.16
0.00 1,196.01 APA000065
0.00 792.56
0.00 180.04
0.00 223.41
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 910.30 APA000066
355.00
65.00 335.00
155.30
644.38 APA000067
-24.77
31.81 30.79
94.20 64.64
11.56 61.87
-64.64
246.35
29.50 31.11
36.83 78.84
16.29 1,128.68 APA000068
1,128.68
4,662.03 APA000069
1,652.61
1,652.61
982.21
374.60
14,363.94 APA000070
14,363.94
1,850.00 APA000071
1,021.02
795.59
33.39 843.60 APA000072
89.43 89.43
103.71
46.21 93.02
89.43 103.71
46.21 93.02
12/13/2021 11:34:31 AM Page 4 or 7
23 Check Register
Vendor Number
Payable 4
23247758
2098
21135113
21137262
3681
202110000169
1113
767572
4115
3750
2238
1568469997
2289
15003821129
1.5003970030
3260
114260825-001
114365200.001
3031.
51718
2309
3904976
3908054
4443
101
4327
5020360X5
5020361X5
5020604X5
5020605X5
Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type
Payable Type Payable Date Payable Description
Invoke 12/01/2021 WW - Prudential Uniforms
QUILL CORPORATON
Invoice
Invoice
12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
11/19/2021 OFFICE SUPPLIES
11/19/2021 OFFICE SUPPLIES
RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT C 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/17/2021 DEPTSUPPLIES
RYAN M. WESTBROOK INC 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/24/2021 ANIMAL CARE SERVICES
SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY MUNICIP 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 12/02/2021 O&M CHARGE AND PER GALLON DISCHAR
SAN GORGONIO MEMORIAL HOSPIT 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 10/28/2021 EMPLOYEE MEDICAL SERVICES
SIMPLIFILE
Invoice
Invoice
12/13/2021 Virtual Pay'
10/31/2021 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
11/30/2021 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY, LLC 12/13/2021 , Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/03/2021 DEPT SUPPLIES
Invoice 11/09/2021 DEPTSUPPLIES
SMARTHIRE 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 10/31/2021 HIRING COSTS
SOUTH COAST AQMD
Invoice
Invoice
12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
11/02/2021 ANNUAL RENEWAL FEE FOR THE WWTP
11/02/2021 ANNUAL RENEWAL FEE FOR THE WWTP
STEVE H NUTT 12/13/2021 • Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/22/2021 HIRING COSTS
TEC EQUIPMENT INC 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/22/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
Invoice 11/22/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
Invoice 12/03/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
Invoice 12/03/2021 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
2405 THE COUNSELING TEAM
80700
Invoice
4267 THERESA MICHEL INVESTIGATIONS 12/13/2021
Invoice 11/29/2021 HIRING COSTS
2.6 2456
7199236-00
7199249-00
7199532-00
7201934-00
7203166-00
7203882.00
7203882-01
2457
025-354486
025-355211
025-355224
025-355654
025-356284
025-357258
TURF STAR, INC.
Invoke
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
12/13/2021
10/25/2021
10/25/2021
10/28/2021
11/15/2021
11/29/2021
12/02/2021
12/03/2021
12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
11/16/2021 HIRING COSTS
Virtual Pay
Virtual Pay
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
TYLER WORKS - TECHNOLOGIES 12/13/2021
Invoice 11/01/2021 MONTHLY FEE
Invoice 10/20/2021 SOFTWARE
Invoice 10/20/2021 SOFTWARE
Invoice 10/27/2021 SOFTWARE
Invoice 10/31/2021 SOFTWARE
Invoice 11/10/2021 SOFTWARE
Virtual Pay
Packet: APPKT01976-20211210 JM AP
Discount Amount Payment Amount
Discount Amount Payable Amount
0.00 89.43
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 169.46 APA000073
0.93 168.53
680.90 APA000074
680.90
111.77 APA000075
111.77
12,174.30 APA000076
12,174.30
0.00 665.80 APA000077
0.00 665.80
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
1,701.00 APA000078
949.00
752.00
3,794.09 APA000079
205.03
3,589.06
144.50 APA0000S0
144.50
582.74 APA000081
440.15
142.59
1,500.00 APA000082
1,500.00
1,330.00 APA000083
480.00
200.00
450.00
200.00
325.00
325.00
1,500.00
1,500.00
1,761.19
282.69
107.78
756.29
200.54
83.01 263.04
67.84 APA000084
APA000085
APA000086
7,790.00 APA000087
50.00 4,750.00
390.00
520.00
520.00
1,560.00
12/13/2021 11:34:31 AM Page 5 of 7
24 Check Register
Vendor Number
Payable #
2461
1120210049
05620205765
3209
19142
20683
3422
80235272
80242032
80463816
80471037
80477908
$0502375
3908
179487
179582
2911
20211106-10333
2555
401107417
3457
S 1531153
Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type
Payable Type Payable Date Payable Description
UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 12/01/2021 DIG ALERT -SEWER
invoke 12/01/2021 DIG ALERT- SEWER
VPLS SOLUTIONS LLC
Invoice
Invoice
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY
Invoke
Invoice
invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoke
12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
10/31/2021 Waste Water Treatment Plant SCADA Inte
12/08/2021 NIMBLE RENEWAL2021
12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
08/20/2021 BUILDING SUPPLIES
08/24/2021 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
11/17/2021
11/19/2021
11/23/2021
12/06/2021
BUILDING SUPPLIES
FACE MASKS
DEPT SUPPLIES
BUILDING SUPPLIES
WEST COASTARBORISTS, INC 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/15/2021 TREE TRIMMING SERVICES - 3 RINGS RAN Invoice 11/12/2021 TREE TRIMMING SERVICES -WILDFLOWE
WILMINGTON TRUST, N.A. 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/06/2021 138228-000 BMT CFD 16-4 2019 SPEC TX XYLEM DEWATERING SOLUTIONS U, 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
lnvoice 08/08/2021 WW - PUMP RENTAL
ZONAR SYSTEMS 12/13/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 12/01/2021 SOFTWARE
Bank Code APBNK Summary
Packet: APPKT01976-20211210 JM AP A
Discount Amount Payment Amount N
Discount Amount Payable Amount
0.00 323.51 APA000088
0.00 229.45
0.00 94.06
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 13,332.72 APA000089
7,500.00
5,832.72
1,992.79 APA000090
32.15 45.65
1,316.12
366.35
121.62
110.90
11,175.00 APA000091
1,800.00
9,375.00
2,000.00 APA000092
2,000.00
0.00 9,573.92 APA000093
0.00 9,573.92
0.00 567.00 APA000094
0.00 567.00
Payable Payment
Payment Type Count Count Discount Payment
Regular Checks 0 0 0.00 0.00
Manual Checks 0 0 0.00 0.00
Voided Checks 0 0 0.00 0.00
Bank Drafts 0 0 0.00 0,00
E FT's 0 0 0.00 0.00
Virtual Payments 182 82 0.00 370,385.26
182 82 0.00 370,385.26
12/13/2021 11:34:31 AM
25 Check Register Packet APPKT01976-20211210 JM`AP
Fund,
999
Virtual Payments
Name.
POOLED CASH
182 82 0.00 370,385.26
Fund Summary
Period
12/2021
Amount.
370,385.26
370,385.26
12/13/2021 11:34:31 AM
26 Item 1.
BEAUMONT
—C A L J F O R N r A ^--
WJ RRANTS TO BE RATIFIED
Monday, December 20, 2021
Printed Checks 110884-110890 $ 102,987.53 EY 21/22
ACH 544-545 S 39,530.49
InyoicePay APA00009S-APA000141 $ 715,788,57
A/P Total 8 858,306,59
Wires
ank Drafts
Sedgwick $ 81,180.07 Workers Comp
MG Trust S 24,641.42 457 Paydate 12/03/21
Ca1PERS $ 47,54199 742 Classic
$ 46,804.17 743 Classic
$ 17,485.85 27308 PEPRA
$ 16,I87.64 25763 PEPRA
AGENDA ITEM NO.
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THIS WARRANT LIST HAS BEEN CO1'WtLED AND PREPARED TO MEET THE DAILY OPERATIONS FOR =FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2021 - JUNE 30, 2022 SIGNATURE:
TITLE: CITY TREAS
SIGNATURE: /
TITLE: FINANICE CTOR /
27 BEAUMONT
City of Beaumont, CA
--c£LI'O�YM1A
Vendor Number Vendor Name
Bank Code: APBNK-AP Bank
2295 SLOVAK BARON EMPEY MURPHY & PINKNEY 12/17/2021 EPT Payable
68242
68243
68244
2540
Payable U
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoke
700-4050-7068.0000
Invoice
700-4050-7068-0000
Invoice
700-4050.7068-0000
Payment Date Payment Type
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name Item Description
12/16/2021 LEGAL SERVICES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES
12/16/2021 LEGAL SERVICES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES
12/16/2021 LEGAL SERVICES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONS 12/17/2021 EFT'
Payable Type Post Date Payable Description
Account Number Item Description
NOVEMBER 2021 Invoice
570-0000-2005-0000
4494 KNIGHT SUNRISE, LLC
Payable # Payable Type
Account Number
1FTMF1CB5MKE invoice
100-3250-8060-0000
4494 KNIGHT SUNRISE, LLC
Payable # Payable Type
Account Number
;FDBF2A63NEC9 Invoice
100-3250-8060-0000
4466
Payable #
3541
3924
Payable #
Account Name
12/16/2021. MSHCP FEES
DUE TO WRCRCA{MSHCP
MSHCP FEES
12/14/2021 Regular
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name Item Description
12/14/2021 F-150 STREETS VEHICLE
VEHICLES F-150 STREETS VEHICLE
12/14/2021 Regular
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name Item Description
12/14/2021 F-250 STREETS VEHICLE
VEHICLES F-250 STREETS VEHICLE
MAGNOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC 12/17/2021 Regular
Payable Type Post Date Payable Description
Account Number
Invoice 12/17/2021 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$00-0000-8030-0000 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPRO
600-5000-7072-0000 FACILITY REPLACEMENT E
600-5000-7072-0000 FACILITY REPLACEMENT E
600-5000-7072-0000 FACILITY REPLACEMENT E
600-5000-7072-0000 FACILITY REPLACEMENT E
MARCUS A ANDREWS
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
500-0000-8990-0000
Account Name Item Description
Check
By Check Number
Date Range: 12/14/2021 - 12/20/2021
Discount Amount Payment Amount Number
0.00 10,180.49 544
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 5,890.84
5,890.84
0.00 2,479.25
2,479.25
0.00 1,810.40
1,810.40
0.00 29,350.00 545
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 29,350.00
29,350.00
0.00 34,631.89 110884
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 34,631.89
34, 631.89
0.00 49,575.30 110885
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 49,575.30
49,575.30
0.00 3,290.00 110887
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
12/17/2021 Regular
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name Item Description
12/16/2021 ELECTRICAL SERVICES
CAPITAL OUTLAY ELECTRICAL SERVICES
2311 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
12/17/2021 Regular
0.00 3,290.00
748.75
295.00
748.75
748.75
748.75
0.00 4,417.40 110888
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 4,417.40
4,417.40
0.00 11,019.76 110889
12/20/2021 1:03:05 PM Page 1 of 4
28 Check Report
Vendor Number
Payable #
12/16/21
4496
Payable #
12/16/21
Vendor Name
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
J.00-3250-7010-0000
100-3250-7010-007A
100-3250-7010-0070
L00 -3250-7010-008A
100-3250-7010-OQ8B
100-3250-7010-008C
100-3250-7010-0080
100-3250-7010-010A
100-3250-7010-012A
x.00 -3250.7010-014x
100.3250-7010-019A
100-3250-7010-019C
100-3250-7010.06A1
100-6050-7010-0000
x.00 -6050-7010-005X
100-6050-7010-007A
00-6050-7010-5400
100-6050-7010-5500
Tara Astran
Payable Type
Account Number
Invoice
100-1225-7035-0000
Post Date
Account Name
12/16/2021 ELECTRIC UTILITY
UTILITIES
UTILITIES (IA 7A)
UTILITIES (IA 70)
UTILITIES CIA 8A)
UTILITIES (IA 8B)
UTILITIES {IA 8C)
UTILITIES (IA 8D)
UTILITIES (IA 10)
UTILITIES (IA 12)
UTILITIES (fA 14)
UTILITIES CIA 19A)
UTILITIES (IA 19C)
UTILITIES (IA 6A1)
UTILITIES
UTILITIES IA5
UTILITIES IA 7A
UTILITIES, PARK (SPORTS
UTILITIES, PARK {STEWAR
12/17/2021
Payment Date Payment Type
Payable Description
Item Description
ELECTRIC UTILITY
ELECTRIC UTILITY
ELECTRIC UTILITY
ELECTRIC UTILITY
ELECTRIC UTILITY
ELECTRIC UTILITY
ELECTRIC UTILITY
ELECTRIC UTILITY
ELECTRIC UTILITY
ELECTRIC UTILITY
ELECTRIC UTILITY
ELECTRIC UTILITY
ELECTRIC UTILITY
ELECTRIC UTILITY
ELECTRIC UTILITY
ELECTRIC UTILITY
ELECTRIC UTILITY
ELECTRIC UTILITY
Regular
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name Item Description
12/16/2021 MEETING SUPPLY REIMBURSEMENT
LOCAL MEETINGS MEETING SUPPLY REIMBURSEM
Payment Type
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Bank Drafts
EFT's
Virtual Payments
Bank Code APBNK Summary
Payable Payment
Count Count
6 0
0 0
4 0
6 0
0 0
2 0
Discount
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Date Range: 12/14/202
Discount Amount Payment Amount
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 11,019.76
2,665.90
165.87
128.00
453.90
115.27
275.87
27.24 54.57
117.89
49.60 244.16
242.79
436.91
769.93
4,636.46
36.48 526.24
72.68 0.00 53.18 110890
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 53.18
53.18 Payment
102,987.53
0.00 0.00
0.00 39,530.49
0.00 10
8 0.00 142,518.02
12/20/2021 1:03:05 PM
29 Vendor Number Vendor Name
Bank Code: PYBANK-BANK OF HEMET
4446
Payable #
Check Report Date Range: 12/14/202
Discount Amount Payment Amount
PAYROLL FED/STATE DEPOSITS
California State Payroll Taxes
Payable Type
Account Number
INV0000432 Invoice
100-0000.2105-0000
4445
Payable #
Federal Deposit
Payable Type
Account Number
JNV0000433 invoice
L00.0000-2105-0000
100-0000-2105-0000
Payment Date Payment Type
12/17/2021 Bank Draft
Post Date Payable Description
Account Name Item Description
12/17/2021 State Withholding
PAYROLL SUSPENSE State Withholding
Post Date
Account Name
12/17/2021 Federal Deposit
PAYROLL SUSPENSE
PAYROLL SUSPENSE Medicare
Payment Type
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Bank Drafts
EFT's
Virtual Payments
Bank Code PYBANK Summary
Payable
Count
0 0
0 2
0 0
Payment
Count
0 0
0'
2 0
0 12/17/2021 Bank Draft
Payable Description
Item Description
Federal Withholding
Discount
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 23,627.97 DFT0003425
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 23,627.97
23,627.97
0.00. 76,664.72 DFT00034 i 6
Discount Amount Payable Amount
Distribution Amount
0.00 76,664.72
58,931.59
17,733.13
Payment
0.00 0.00
0,00
100,292.69
0.00 0,00
2 2 0.00 100,292.69
12/20/2021 1:03:05 PM
30 Check Report Date Range: 12/14/2029 Item 1. '1
All Bank Codes Check Summary
Payable Payment
Payment Type Count Count Discount Payment
Regular Checks 6 6 0.00 102,98733
Manual Checks 0 0 0.00 0.00
Voided Checks 0 0 0.00 0.00
Bank Drafts 2 2 0.00 100,292.69
EFT's 4 2 0.00 39,530.49
Virtual Payments 0 0 0.00 0.00
12 10 0.00 242,810.71
Fund Summary
Fund
999
Name
POOLED CASH
Period
12/2021
Amount
242,810.71
242,810.71
12/20/2021 1:03:05 PM
31 BEAUMONT
Payable #
Payable Description
City of Beaumont, CA
Payable R
Payable Detail by Vendo
Packet: APPKTO1979 - 20211214 3M SUNRISE FORD
Payable Type Post Date Payable Date Due Date Discount Date Amount Tax Shipping Discount Total sank Code On Hold
Vendor: 4494 - KNIGHT SUNRISE. LLC Vendor Total: 84,207.19 1FDBF2A63NEC96997 Invoice 12/14/2021 12/14/2021 12/14/2021 12/14/2021 49,575.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 49,575.30 F-250 STREETS VEHICLE APBNK - AP Bank No
Items
Item Description Commodity Units Price Amount Tax Shipping Discount Total F-250 STREETS VEHICLE Goods 1.00 49,575.30 49,575.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 49,575.30 Distributions
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key Amount Percent 100-3250-8060-0000 VEHICLES 49,575.30 100.00%
1FTMF1CB5MKE58923 Invoice 12/14/2021 12/14/2021 12/14/2021 12/14/2021 34,631.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,631.89 F-150 STREETS VEHICLE APBNK - AP Hank No
Items
Item Description Commodity Units Price Amount Tax Shipping Discount Total F-150 STREETS VEHICLE Goods . 1.00 34,631.89 34,631.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,631.89 Distributions
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key Amount Percent 100-3250-8060-0000 VEHICLES 34,631.89 100.00%
12/14/2021 4:15:59 PM Rag
32 Payable Register
.Payable Summary
Packet: APPKT01979 - 20211214:!M SUNRISE FORD
Item 1.
Type
Count Gross Tax Shipping Discount Total Manual Payment Balance Invoice
2 Grand Total:
84,207.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 84,207.19
84,207.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 84,207.19
0,00
0.00 84,207.19
84,207.19
12/14/2021 4:15:59 PM Pa
33 Payable Register
Accourit Summary
• Packet: APPKT01979 - 20211214 JM SUNRI
Account
Name
Amount
,190-3250.8060.0000
VEHICLES
Total:
84,207.19
-84,207.19
12/14/2021 4:15:59 PM - Page 3 of 3
34 BEAUMONT
••••C P L P 01 1 1 £---
Vendor Number
Payable #
Bank Code: APBNK-AP
1050
LGVF-KJLL-41F3
1.1KO-JVWP--GPP
3129
0063904 -IN
1147
01/03/22
4175
7579343
City of Beaumont, CA
Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type
Payable Type Payable Date Payable Description
Bank
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoke 12/08/2021 OFFICE SUPPLIES
Invoke 12/02/2021 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
BC RENTALS, INC 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 10/25/2021 Streets -Special Dept Supplies
BEAUMONT CHERRY VALLEY WATEF 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 12/16/2021 WATER UTILITY
BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES, 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 09/29/2021 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Check R
Packet: APPKTO1998 - 20211217 JM APA PAYMENT
4373 CALIFORNIA WATERS, LLC 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
1 Invoice 11/30/2021 STEWART PARK SPLASH DESIGN & ENGINE 11595 Invoice 11/30/2021 RANGEL PARK SPLASH PAD DESIGN & ENG 1242
0954-1006729
0954-1007607
0954-1007639
0954-1007841
0954-1008461
1250
35383
CED
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoke
Invoice
CHAMBERS GROUP, INC
invoice
1285 CITY OF BANNING
74105-54930 10/ Invoice
1302
2101293
4196
63325
1402
547049
1408
$L220415
12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
09/15/2021 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES - ELECTRICAL
10/21/2021 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES - ELECTRICAL
10/22/2021 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES - ELECTRICAL
11/22/2021 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES - ELECTRICAL
12/01/2021 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES - ELECTRICAL
12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
11/17/2021 ENVIRO SERVICES & CEQA DOCUMENT PR
12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
10/23/2021 SHARED TRAFFIC SIGNAL UTILITY @ HS W
CLINICAL LABORATORY OF SAN SERI 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 12/01/2021 Clinical Labs
D & Z INC 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 09/18/2020 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
invoice 11/04/2021 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIOP 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 10/19/2021 SIGNALS & LIGHTING BILLING
1424 DIRECTV
039668521X2112 invoice
045085274X2112 Invoice
051553347X2112 Invoice
063515264X211X Invoice
1477
57326
57409
1518
CF5-2818126
4400
JNV-005581
12/20/2021
12/02/2021 BUILDING UTILITY
12/02/2021 BUILDING UTILITY
12/02/2021 BUILDING UTILITY
12/02/2021 BUILDING UTILITY
Virtual Pay
ENGINEERING RESOURCES OF SCUT 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 10/19/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU
Invoice 11/12/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU
FLYERS ENERGY 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/20/2021 FUEL EXPENSE
FROG ENVIRONMENTAL INC 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/28/2021 SWPPP & NOi SERVICES
By Check Number
Discount Amount Payment Amount Number
Discount Amount Payable Amount
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0,00
0.00 75.93 APA000095
32.01 43.92
172.07 APA000096
172.07
53,983.52 APA000097
53,983.52
6,447.55 APA000098
6,447.55
21,500.00 APA000099
20,500.00
1,000.00
1,252.12 APA000100
455.90
258.60
220.83
148.70
168.09
9,733.90 APA000101
9,733.90
66.46 66.46
8,140.00
8,140.00
340.00
340.00
210.00
210.00
1,924.73
1,924.73
322.76
84.44 119.44
59.44 59.44
APA000102
APA000103
APA000104
APA000105
APA000106
APA000107
315.58 APA000108
198.08
117.50
789.15 APA000109
789.15
0.00 195.00 APA000110
0.00 195.00
12/20/2021 1:06:31 PM Page 1 of 5
35 Check Register
Vendor Number
Payable It
1533
323-156.8188-02
951-197-0624-08
951-197-0863.06
951-769-8500-01
951-769-8520-01
951-769-8530-06
3718
C75382
1603
12]65110
3515
795701
795715
796916
1806
458884582
459164646
3379
277752
Vendor Name
Payable Type
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS 12/20/2021
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
invoice
Invoice
11/28/2021
12/02/2021
12/01/2021
11/28/2021
11/28/2021
11/28/2021
PHONE UTILITY
PHONE UTILITY
PHONE UTILITY
PHONE UTILITY
PHONE UTILITY
PHONE UTILITY
Payment Date Payment Type
Payable Date Payable Description
Virtual Pay
HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 10/27/2021 STREETS - KEG FLOOR CLEANER NOZZLE
HACH COMPANY 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/26/2021 WWTP EQUIP/MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES
HO SUPPLY FACILITIES MAINTENANI 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/17/2021 WWTP DEPT SUPPLIES
Invoice 11/17/2021 WWTP DEPT SUPPLIES
Invoice 11/18/2021 WWTP DEPT SUPPLIES
KONICA MINOLTA PREMIER FINANC 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/24/2021 PRINTER RENTAL AND SERVICES
Invoice 11/29/2021 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
LAW OFFICES BURKE, WILLIAMS & 5 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 12/08/2021 LEGAL SERVICES
1856 LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
803654-2021113
4396
102313
4439
906
2892
00765063
1971
1162342955
2007
217361
233330
233331
233332
233338
233342
233345
233355
733358
733366
733369
233371
233376
233378
233383
733386
733389
733395
733401
233405
733413
Invoice
LPA INC
Invoice
MARISCAL PAINTING
Invoice
MOFFATT & NICHOL
Invoice
MOTOROLA
Invoice
NV5, INC
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
11/30/2021 DORS ANNUAL LICENSE
12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
12/06/2021 PO FEASIBILITY STUDY
12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
11/29/2021 City Hall Repaint and Stucco Project
12/20/2021 Vlrtuat Pay
11/22/2021 ENVIROMENTAL DOC SERVICES FOR PENN
12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
10/14/2021 Purchase of 28 Portable Police Radios
12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
07/11/2021 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU
09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU
09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU
09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU
09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALL SU
09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU
09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU
09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU
09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU
09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU
09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU
09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU
09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU
09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU
09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU
09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU
09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU
09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU
09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU
09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU
Packet: AP P KT01998-20211217 JM
Discount Amount Payment Amount
Discount Amount Payable Amount
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 2,491.91 APA000111
85.98 250.93
356.12
1,356.76
204.82
237.30
0.00 4,398.55 APA000112
0.00 4,398.55
0.00 1,719.69 APA000113
0.00 1,719.69
0.00 1,027.16 APA000114
0.00 35.02
0.00 927.81
0.00 64.33
0.00 4,520.08 APA000115
0.00 3,919.91
0.00 600.17
0.00 980.00 APA000116
0.00 980.00
0.00 8,268.75 APA000117
0.00 8,268.75
0.00 26,187.50 APA000118
0.00 26,187.50
0.00 68,093.00 APA000119
0.00 68,093.00
0.00 9,651.00 APA000120
0.00 9,651.00
0.00 240,000.00 APA000121
0.00 240,000.00
0.00 49,202.62 APA000122
0.00 1,015.00
0.00 937.59
0.00 97.50
0.00 1,923.90
0.00 1,763.57
0.00 1,923.90
0.00 2,299.96
0.00 1,850.34
0.00 1,473.36
0.00 1,078.99
0.00 821.17
0.00 4,913.92
0.00 2,324.84
0.00 130.00
0.00 1,094.89
0.00 892.94
0.00 1,291.20
0.00 357.18
0.00 535.77
0.00 211.35
0.00 211.35
12/20/2021 1:06:31 PM Page 2 of 5
36 Check Register Packet: APPKT01998-20211217 JM
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Payable 4 Payable Type Payable Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount 233420 Invoice 09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 1,875.18 233432 Invoice 09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 71436 233435 Invoice 09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 535.77 233438 Invoice 09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 535.77 233439 Invoice 09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 714.36 233440 Invoice 09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 535.77 233441 Invoice 09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 892.94 233443 Invoice 09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 714.36 233444 Invoice 09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 357.18 233445 Invoice 09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALL 5U 0.00 2,187.71 233446 Invoice 09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 714.36 233448 Invoice 09/27/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 487.50 233450 Invoice 09/27/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 585.00 233455 Invoke 09/27/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALL 5U 0.00 147.50 233459 Invoice 09/27/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 295.00 233467 Invoice 10/27/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 356.25 233526 Invoice 10/27/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 428.75 233529 Invoice 10/27/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 162.50 233531 Invoice 10/27/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALL SU 0.00 910.00 233540 Invoice 10/27/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALL SU 0.00 455.00 233541 Invoice 10/27/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 2,122.50 233542 Invoice 10/27/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 505,00 233543 Invoice 09/27/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 375.00 733544 Invoice 09/27/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 3,065.00 233545 Invoice 09/27/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 952.50 233858 Invoice 09/30/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 535.70 236054 Invoice 10/11/2021 ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK & ON CALLSU 0.00 892.94 3642 PLACEWORKS, INC 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
77067 Invoke 11/30/2021 Potrero Logistics PP2020-0273
2076 PRINTING & PROMOTION PLUS, INC 12/20/2021
81546
3652
23208714
23237467
23243571
23247708
23250788
23250797
23250801
Invoice 11/17/2021 DEPT SUPPLIES
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 12/20/2021
Invoice 09/08/2021
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
11/10/2021
11/24/2021
12/01/2021
12/08/2021
12/08/2021
12/08/2021
Virtual Pay
Virtual Pay
Streets - Prudential Uniforms
Streets - Prudential Uniforms
Streets - Prudential Uniforms
Streets - Prudential Uniforms
Uniform Rental and Cleaning
Uniform Rental and Cleaning
Uniform Rental and Cleaning
3479 R3 CONSULTING GROUP, INC 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
10652
3716
204188
4425
10230
10309
3498
22057
2407
Invoke 10/04/2021 LEGALSERVICES - PROP 26 ANALYSIS
SCCI, INC 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/18/2021 EMPLOYEE TRAINING
SEPARATION PROCESSES INC. 12/20/2021
Invoice 09/03/2021 LEGALSERVICES
Invoice 12/06/2021 LEGALSERVICES
SKM ENGINERRING LLC
Invoice
THE GAS COMPANY
0382293741712/ Invoice
0578954442512/ Invoice
2260494809612/ Invoice
Virtual Pay
12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
11/10/2021 Professional Engineering Services for PLC
12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
12/07/2021
12/07/2021
12/03/2021
GAS UTILITY
GAS UTILITY
GAS UTILITY
3751 TOM PONTON INDUSTRIES, INC. 12/20/2021
Virtual Pay
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0,00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0,00
56.25 APA000123
56.25 697.85 APA000124
697.85
476.18 APA000125
58.31 58.31
58.31 58.31
103.71
46.21 93.02
2,117.50 APA000126
2,117,50
0.00 250.00 APA000127
0.00 250.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 5,890.84 APA000128
486.00
5,404.84
3,615.00 APA000129
3,615.00
262.11 APA000130
40.51 132.50
89.10 0.00 4,275.52 APA000131
12/20/2021 1:06:31 PM Page 3 of 5
37 Check Register
Vendor Number
Payable #
23977-44722
Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type
Payable Type Payable Date Payable Description
Invoice 11/24/2021 DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES
4489 TRI-POINTE HOMES 1E -SO INC 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay Invoice 12/16/2021 REFUND OF PLANNING DEPOSIT
TYLER WORKS - TECHNOLOGIES 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 12/01/2021 SOFTWARE
pLAN2021-0657
2457
025-358689
2466
199366539-002
2484
9893542068
9893749723
9893749724
9893749725
9893749726
9893749727
2517
8690650032148
2518
73034847
73086400
73122134
3248
20210527
UNITED RENTALS 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 10/19/2021 BACKHOE RENTAL
VERIZON
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
11/23/2021
11/26/2021
11/26/2021
11/26/2021
11/26/2021
11/26/2021
PD AIRCARD
PHONE UTILITY
PHONE UTILITY
IPADS -1550
IPADS - 3100
IPADS -1550/6050
VOYAGER 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/24/2021 FUEL EXPENSE
VULCAN MATERIALS
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
12/20/2021
08/11/2021 ST - SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES
09/30/2021 ST - SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES
11/10/2021 ST -SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES
Virtua: Pay
WEBB MUNICIPAL FINANCE, LLC 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 11/20/2021 CFD Administration
4477 WESTBOUND COMMUNICATIONS, I 12/20/2021
4680
2546
002-25537,
002-25532
2555
401113851
401130601
Invoice 10/18/2021 CIP brochure
WILLDAN ENGINEERING
Invoice
Invoice
Virtual Pay
12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
12/01/2021 FY 21/22 Building Inspector Services, Will
12/01/2021 PERMIT TECHNICIAN
XYLEM DEWATERING SOLUTIONS U. 12/20/2021 Virtual Pay
Invoice 09/05/2021 WW - PUMP RENTAL
Invoice 11/16/2021 WW - PUMP RENTAL
Payment Type
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Bank Drafts
EFT's
Virtual Payments
Bank CodeAPBNK Summary
Payable
Count
0 0
0 0
0 130
Payment
Count
0 0
0 0
0 47
Discount
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Packet: APPICT01998-20211217 JM
Discount Amount Payment Amount
Discount Amount Payable Amount
0.00 4,275.52
0.00 8,889.08 APA000132
0.00 8,889.08
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 50.00
50.00 2,095.18
2,095.18
17,643.20
11,168.42
5,351.29
920.24
76.02 76.02
51.21 APA000133
APA000134
APA000135
0.00 48,816.93 APA000136
0.00 48,816.93
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
597.74 APA000137
329.00
189.00
79.74 0.00 48,783.75 APA000138
0.00 48,783.75
0.00 24,500.00 APA000139
0.00 24,500.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Payment
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 715,788.57
130 47 0.00 715,788.57
8,280.00 APA000140
2,160.00
6,120.00
16,482.41 APA000141
8,748.38
7,734.03
12/20/2021 1:06:31 PM Page 4 of 5
38 Check Register
Packet: APPKT01998-202112171M
Virtual Payments 130 47 0,00 715;788.57
Fund Summary
Fund 7Jame Period Amount.
999 POOLED CASH 12/2021 715,788,57
715,788.57
' i
12/20/2021 1:06:31 PM
Item 2.
BEAUMONTA -C A L I F 0 R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Jennifer Ustation, Finance Director
DATE January 4, 2022
SUBJECT: FY2022 General Fund and Wastewater Budget to Actual through November, 2021
Background and Analysis:
City staff has updated the analysis of the General Fund and Wastewater Fund for FY2022 with results through November 2021.
General Fund Analysis:
• Three months of sales tax has been received and is trending higher than budget; • Increased building permit activity in comparison to prior years while other permitting activity is lower, mostly due to applying invoices directly to deposits; • Low -rate market is continuing to keep interest earnings estimated lower than budget, however, funds have been deposited with the trustee for investment with Public Trust. Will monitor results and report quarterly; • 10 of 26 pay periods have been reported and costs are trending lower than budget;
• Recruitment costs are trending high;
• Utilities are trending slightly high; and
• Contractual services are trending lower than budget, however, the fire services contract has had no payments to date.
The attached report (Attachment A) provides preliminary estimates reflecting five months into FY2022. Estimate values can change as activity is recorded. Property tax is received in January and May of each year. Three months of sales tax has been received and seems to be trending high. Building permit activity is also trending high however other permit activity will be decreased due to a change in deposit accounting.
Investment income remains lower than budget but will be monitored. Personnel costs are trending to have a savings; however, recruitment is trending high. On August 3, 2021, City Council approved a budget amendment for unspent prior year appropriations 40 Item 2.
and reappropriated $214,799 for FY2022. This allows for $741,845 of available funds for City Council to appropriate throughout the year.
Wastewater Fund Analysis:
• Two of six utility billings recorded;
• Low -rate market continuing to keep interest earnings estimated lower than budget, will monitor continuing results;
• 10 of 26 pay periods recorded and costs are trending lower than budget; • Fuel costs are trending higher than budget;
• Supplies are trending lower than budget; and
• One of two debt service payments have been recorded.
Based on year-end projections the Wastewater fund is trending to have approximately $424,000 to be retained for utility reserves for FY2022. This is driven by savings in both personnel and operating costs and a slight increase of revenues.
Fiscal Impact:
City staff estimates the cost to prepare this report to be $350.
Recommended Action:
Receive and file the attached reports.
Attachments:
A. General Fund Budget to Actual through November 2021
B. Wastewater Fund Budget to Actual through November 2021 41 EAB UMONT
Su bCategory
Category: 40 - TAXES
400 - Real Property Taxes
403 - Personal Property Taxes
409 - Sales Taxes
420 - Other Taxes
Total Category: 40 - TAXES:
Category: 41- LICENSES
430 - Business Licenses
Total Category: 41- LICENSES:
Category: 42 - PERMITS
450 - Building Permits
453 - Inspections
456 - Other Permits
515 - Public Works
Total Category: 42 - PERMITS:
Category: 43 - FRANCHISE FEES
406 - Franchise Fees
Total Category: 43 - FRANCHISE FEES:
Category: 45 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL
460 - Federal
465 - State
470 - Local
tal Category: 45 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL:
Category: 47 - CHARGES FOR SERVICE
Budget Comparison Report
General Fund Budget to Actual through November 2021
Estimated Beginning Fund Balance:
2019-2020
YTD Activity
123,168.65
229,770.24
1,433,690.45
647,191.95
2,433,821.29
124,126.03
2020-2021
YTD Activity
333,167.76
180,345.41
2,106,690.30
784,734.46
3,404,937.93
202,004.85
2021-2022
YTD Activity
75,361.69
207,936.32
3,209,283.19
846,047.33
4,338,628.53
120,873.65
124,126.03
846,939.20
65,088.80
183,276.83
1,095,304.83
6,171, 910.11
6,171,910.11
202,004.85
581,194.57
121,824.98
167,598.23
870,617.78
1,170,498.57
1,170,498.57
120,873.65
1,415,567.23
25,000.00
166,911.04
2,039.98
1,609,518.25
1,169,124.31
1,169,124.31
17,037.45
17,037.45
Parent Budget
2021-2022
V3
6,516,588.00
277,822.00
6,926,638.00
8,462,873.00
22,183,921.00
405,000.00
405,000.00
2,857,250.00
376,200.00
746,575.00
3,980,025.00
3,111,474.00
3,111,474.00
17.6m
FY2022 Estimate
Notes
Item 2.
6,516,588.00
236,232.00
7,992,630.00
Sales Tax coming in
higher than anticipated
8,570,667.00
23,316,117.00
402,350.00
402,350.00
3,091,631.00
113,520.00
527,354.00
2,040.00
3,734,545.00
3,092,134.00
3,092,134.00
Receipt will be
reclassed
42 500 - Sanitation
505 - Animal Control
510 - Community Development
515 - Public Works
525 - Abatements
530 - Public Safety
535 - Facilities
540 - Programs
545 - Other
la! Category: 47 - CHARGES FOR SERVICE:
Category: 50 - FINES AND FORFEITURES
555 - Vehicle
557 - Other
it Category: 50 - FINES AND FORFEITURES:
Category: 53 - COST RECOVERY
465 - State
565 - Other Income
Total Category: 53 - COST RECOVERY:
Category: 54 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
560 - Investment Earnings
565 - Other Income
ategory: 54 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES:
Category: 58 - OTHER FINANCING SOURCI
595 - Sale of Assets
599 - Other
tegory: 58 - OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Category: 90 - TRANSFERS
900 - Transfers
112,614.53
41,251.56
2,348.00
3,829.00
5,323.50
41,317.73
56,478.80
48,387.00
22,466.49
334,016.61
30,675.59
14,226.88
19,428.94
45,789.64
1,512.00
42,772.06
9,948.42
30,926.75
38,953.10
500.00
29,996.67
39,014.93
1,752.00
10,924.20
282,774.09
101,762.47
5,717.00
14,100.00
219,827.58
19,985.68
6,402.45
44,902.47
24,854.02
233,815.57
26,388.13
120,758.88
111,564.00
6,135.00
15,500.00
67,399.00
450,496.00
131,020.00
18,750.00
280,050.00
456,044.69 1,080, 914.00
31,983.37 76,608.00
22,323.36 52,195.00
54,306.73 128,803.00
13,226.32 20,000.00
272,958.61 432,500.00
258,669.59
51,960.83
22,853.66
74,814.49
13,400.00
(33.34)
120,758.88
28,886.61
10,989.84
39,876.45
(6.99)
13,366.66
580,656.23
(6.99)
2,826,944.51
286,184.93 452,500.00
10,064.77 275,000.00
(3,138.38)
6,926.39
1,128.51
94.06 1,222.57
34,000.00
309,000.00
475,524.56 7,859,575.00
93,633.00
4,205.00
5,500.00
56,318.00
475,365.00
219,548.00
13,720.00
247,050.00
1,115,339.00
76,759.00
53,575.00
130,334.00
Item 2.
Passport services $33k
of budget, not doing
them at this time
26,592.00
Insurance Recovery
518,825.00 Higher than expected
545,417.00
75,000.00
36,450.00
111,450.00
2,500.00
100.00
2,600.00
Interest rates still low
however will watch
activity now that funds
are invested with Public
Trust
7,859,575.00 All transfers expected
to be made
43 Total Category: 90 - TRANSFERS: 580,656.23
3,006,217.98
475,524.56
7,859,575.00
7,859,575.00
Total Revenue 11,131,588.31
9,061,121.16
8,518,354.61
39,511,212.00
40,309,861.00
Category: 60 - PERSONNEL SERVICES
600 - SALARIES AND WAGES
610 - BENEFITS
615 - OTHER
699 - OTHER
otal Category: 60 - PERSONNEL SERVICES:
Category: 65 - OPERATING COSTS
615 - OTHER
650 - UTILITIES
655 - ADMINISTRATIVE
660 - FLEET COSTS
665 - PROGRAM COSTS
670 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE
675 - SUPPLIES
680 - SPECIAL SERVICES
690 - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
697 - ADMIN OVERHEAD
699 - OTHER
4,530,250.29
3,568,403.56
99,822.85
8,430.64
8,206,907.34
13,831.43
773,476.01
145,071.65
155,736.89
358,362.93
115,543.28
108,920.29
380,926.71
1,128,546.02
(187,500.00)
1,154, 843.20
4,699,906.75 5,213,371.57
2,957,815.78
96,750.05
8,458.75
7,762,931.33
15,133.70
736,116.07
147,169.67
152,749.10
423,860.75
257,652.44
92,107.23
74,757.32
1,051,902.53
2,990,285.31
111,106.88
_ 9,531.80
8,324,295.56
21,960.00
834,734.56
172,360.75
182,316.09
329,291.00
343,452.54
204,301.78
233,497.40
945,181.93
1,477,556.01 1,750,603.54
14,705,777.00
6,538,910.00
299,816.00
95,850.00
21,640,353.00
35,000.00
1,624,392.00
642,892.00
415,389.00
750,250.00
885,627.00
998,261.00
946,200.00
7,337,385.00
1,915,874.00
Item 2.
14,368,050.00 10 out of 26 pay
periods recorded
6,011,503.00
288,877.01
95,850.00
20,764,280.00
Recruitment costs
52,704.00 running high
2,003,363.00 Utilities running high
579,132.00
486,176.00
711,268.00
865,500.00
935,486.00
788,413.00
7,008,702.00 Fire Contract invoice
not in actuals yet
1,847,887.01
Total Category: 65 - OPERATING COSTS: 4,147,758.41
4,429,004.82 5,017,699.59
15,551,270.00
15,278,631.00
Category: 70 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
700 - EQUIPMENT
703 - FURNITURE
705 - VEHICLE
710 - STRUCTURE
18,634.70
6,465.81
106,394.72
41,115.21
139,208.64
121,441.96
157,114.16
62,500.00
344,751.00
848,626.00
320,606.00
848,626.00
Budgeted in Transfer
250,000.00 Out
Category: 70 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS:
131,495.23
180,323.85
341,056.12
1,193,377.00
1,419,232.00
Category: 77 - CONTINGENCY
770 - CONTINGENCY
150,000.00
150,000.00
150,000.00
Total Category: 77 - CONTINGENCY:
150,000.00
44 Category: 90 - TRANSFERS
900 - Transfers - 8,226.53
449,166.00 199,166.00
449,166.00 199,166.00
Total Category: 90 - TRANSFERS: 8,226.53
Total Expense
12,486,160.98 12,380,486.53
13,683,051.27 38,984,166.00 37,811,309.01
Total Fund 100 - General Fund
(1,354,572.67) (3,319,365.37) (5,164,696.66)
527,046.00 2,498,552.00
Add Back Reappropriation of Unspent Funds 214,799.00 214,799.00 Funds Over/(Under) Budget 741,845.00 2,713,351.00
Estimated Ending Fund Balance $20.3m
Item 2.
45 Item 2.
Budget Comparison Report
City of Beaumont, CA
BEAUMONT through November 2021
Category: 50 - FINES AND FORFEITURES
557 - Other
Total Category: 50 - FINES AND FORFEITURES:
Category: 53 - COST RECOVERY
565 - Other Income
Total Category: 53 - COST RECOVERY:
Category: 54 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES
560 - Investment Earnings
Estimated Beginning Fund Balance: $6.4m
Parent Budget
2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2021-2022
YTD Activity YTD Activity YTD Activity V3
Through Per
6,236.10
6,236.10
16,118.54
Total Category: 54 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES: 16,118.54
Category: 56 - PROPRIETARY REVENUES
570 - WasteWater
Total Category: 56 - PROPRIETARY REVENUES:
3,309,322.42
3,309,322.42
7,092.61 2,570.17
7,092.61
3,340,331.14
3,340,331.14
2,570.17
3,718,695.29
3,718,695.29
FY2022 Estimate Notes
5,000.00 5,000.00
5,000.00 5,000.00
5,000.00 5,000.00
5,000.00 5,000.00
25,000.00
25,000.00 Interest rates still low
however will monitor
since funds have been
invested with Public
Trust
25,000.00 25,000.00
12,300,500.00
12,300,500.00
12,305,162.00 2 of 6 billings recorded
12,305,162.00
Category: 58 - OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
599 - Other - - 660.00 - 600.00
Total Category: 58 - OTHER FINANCING SOURCES: 660.00 600.00 Total Revenue 3,331,677.06 3,347,423.75 3,721,925.46
12,335,500.00 12,340,762.00
Category: 60 - PERSONNEL SERVICES
600 - SALARIES AND WAGES
610 - BENEFITS
615 - OTHER
699 - OTHER
Total Category: 60 - PERSONNEL SERVICES:
403,724.00
167,765.96
6,733.05
294.22
390,081.03 535,855.50
148,803.81
6,105.40
1,237.70
226,412.15
8,156.26
1,305.29
578,517.23
546,227.94 771,729.20
1,743,067.00
648,237.00
24,103.00
12,300.00
1,598,953.00 10 out of 26 payrolls
posted
521,745.99
23,562.00
12,300.00
2,427,707.00 2,156,561.00
46 Item 2.
Category: 65 - OPERATING COSTS
615 - OTHER
650 - UTILITIES
655 - ADMINISTRATIVE
660 - FLEET COSTS
670 - REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE
675 - SUPPLIES
690 - CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
697 - ADMIN OVERHEAD
699 - OTHER
364,818.68 333,747.17
44,882.37 58,120.85
11,220.49 11,458.28
32,378.45 19,472.52
82,495.40 137,980.69
274,447.06 305,111.07
162,500.00
74,020.01
24,765.91
345,055.46
62,014.10
19,015.13
10,822.33
163,641.86
275,832.17
101,177.72
767,796.00
187,475.00
34,820.00
96,200.00
553,900.00
1,318,816.00
649,050.00
828,133.00 Utilities running high
163,717.00
45,636.00 Fuel costs running high
96,200.00
521,122.00
1,261,996.99
542,826.00
Total Category: 65 - OPERATING COSTS:
1,046,762.46
890,656.49 977,558.77 3,608,057.00
3,459,631.00
Category: 70 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
700 - EQUIPMENT
705 - VEHICLE
750 - OTHER
34,545.84 148,049.02
89,711.14
198,638.00
215,000.00
263,693.00
198,638.00
215,000.00
263,693.00
677,331.00
Total Category: 70 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS:
34,545.84 280,832.16
677,331.00
Category: 90 - TRANSFERS
900 - Transfers
2,967,753.16 3,334,343.75
171,537.50 5,622,405.00
5,622,405.00 All transfers expected
to be made
Total Category: 90 - TRANSFERS:
2,967,753.16 3,334,343.75
171,537.50 5,622,405.00
5,622,405.00
Total Expense
4,593,032.85 4,805,774.02 2,201,657.63 12,335,500.00
11,915,928.00
Total Fund 700 - Wastewater Fund
(1,261,355.79) (1,458,350.27) 1,520,267.83
424,834.01
Estimated Ending Fund Balance:
$6.8m
47 Item 3.
BEAUMONTA -C A L I F O R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Nicole Wheelwright, Deputy City Clerk
DATE January 4, 2022
SUBJECT: Re -Ratification of Local Emergency and Re -Authorizing the Use of Teleconferencing to Conduct Public Meetings
Background and Analysis:
On December 7, 2021, City Council adopted a resolution finding that certain conditions exist that necessitate the need to implement the Ralph M. Brown Act provisions provided by Government Code Section 54953. The recent amendment to Section 54953 allows the use of teleconferencing to conduct meetings of Beaumont's legislative bodies with exemptions to the process and procedure. These provisions are listed in full detail in the table below.
Assembly Bill 361 (AB361) was signed by Governor Newsom with an effective date of October 1, 2021, which provides exemptions to the procedures of conducting public meetings with the use of teleconferencing. Prior to AB361, the City of Beaumont conducted teleconferenced and hybrid public meetings in accordance with Executive Order N-08-21. That order held an expiration date of September 30, 2021.
AB361 amends Government Code Section 54953 to provide provisions to facilitate teleconferenced meetings during a declared state of emergency. These provisions can only be used in an active gubernatorial state of emergency. The provisions from this amendment are listed in the table below:
Brown Act Requirements
Provisions in AB361 Amendment
If the legislative body of a local agency
elects to use teleconferencing, it shall
post agendas at all teleconference
locations and conduct teleconference
meetings in a manner that protects the
statutory and constitutional rights of the
Agendas not required to be posted at all
teleconference locations.
Meeting must still be conducted in a
manner that protects the statutory and
constitutional rights of the parties or the
48 Item 3.
parties or the public appearing before
the legislative body of a local agency.
public appearing before the legislative
body of a local agency.
If the legislative body of a local agency
elects to use teleconferencing, each
teleconference location shall be identified
in the notice and agenda of the meeting
or proceeding, and each teleconference
location shall be accessible to the public.
Agendas are not required to identify each
teleconference location in the meeting
notice/agenda.
Local agencies are not required to make
each teleconference location accessible
to the public.
If the legislative body of a local agency
elects to use teleconferencing, during the
teleconferenced meeting, at least a
quorum of the members of the legislative
body shall participate from locations
within the boundaries of the territory over
which the local agency exercises
jurisdiction.
No requirement to have a quorum of
board members participate from within
the territorial bounds of the local agency's
jurisdiction.
If the legislative body of a local agency
elects to use teleconferencing, the
agenda shall provide an opportunity for
members of the public to address the
legislative body directly at each
teleconference location.
In each instance in which notice of the
time of the teleconferenced meeting is
given or the agenda for the meeting is
posted, the legislative body shall also
give notice of the manner by which
members of the public may access the
meeting and offer public comment.
The agenda shall identify and include an
opportunity for all persons to attend via a
call -in option or an internet-based service
option.
The legislative body shall allow members
of the public to access the meeting, and
the agenda shall include an opportunity
for members of the public to address the
legislative body directly.
In the event of a disruption which
prevents the local agency from
broadcasting the meeting to members of
the public using the call -in option or
49 Item 3.
internet-based service option, or in the
event of a disruption within the local
agency's control which prevents
members of the public from offering
public comments using the call -in option
or internet-based service option, the
legislative body shall take no further
action on items appearing on the meeting
agenda until public access to the meeting
via the call -in option or internet-based
service option is restored.
Written/remote public comment must be
accepted until the point at which the
public comment period is formally closed;
registration/sign-up to provide/be
recognized to provide public comment
can only be closed when the public
comment period is formally closed.
A member of the public shall not be
required, as a condition to attendance at
a meeting of a legislative body of a local
agency, to register his or her name, to
provide other information, to complete a
questionnaire, or otherwise to fulfill any
condition precedent to his or her
attendance. If an attendance list, register,
questionnaire, or other similar document
is posted at or near the entrance to the
room where the meeting is to be held or
is circulated to the persons present during
the meeting, it shall state clearly that the
signing, registering, or completion of the
document is voluntary, and that all
persons may attend the meeting
regardless of whether a person signs,
registers, or completes the document.
An individual desiring to provide public
comment through the use of an internet
website, or other online platform, not
under the control of the local legislative
body that requires registration to log in to
a teleconference, may be required to
register as required by the third -party
internet website or online platform to
participate.
In order for a local agency to use the provisions provided by AB361, the agency must determine by majority vote that meeting in -person would present imminent risks to 50 Item 3.
health or safety of attendees and adopt a resolution stating such with a maximum period of thirty days. Thereafter, on a thirty -day basis, the City Council could then consider the continuance of teleconferenced public meetings by way of resolution after a re- evaluation of the state of emergency circumstances. In order to continue to facilitate meetings of the City's legislative bodies, City Council would affirm the following findings:
(A) The legislative body has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency. (B) Any of the following circumstances exist:
(i) The state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person.
(ii) State or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing.
Fiscal Impact:
City staff estimates the cost to prepare this staff report to be $1,040.
Recommended Action:
Waive the full reading and adopt by title only, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Beaumont Proclaiming a Local Emergency Persists, Re -Ratifying the Proclamation of a State of Emergency by Executive Order N-09-21, and Re - Authorizing Remote Teleconference Meetings of the Legislative Bodies of the City of Beaumont for the Period of January 6, 2022, through February 5, 2022, Pursuant to Provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act."
Attachments:
A. Resolution
51 Item 3.
RESOLUTION 2022-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT,
CALIFORNIA, PROCLAIMING A LOCAL EMERGENCY PERSISTS, RE -RATIFYING
THE PROCLAMATION OF A STATE OF EMERGENCY BY EXECUTIVE ORDER N- 09-21, AND RE -AUTHORIZING REMOTE TELECONFERENCE MEETINGS OF THE
LEGISLATIVE BODIES OF THE
CITY OF BEAUMONT FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 6, 2022 — FEBRUARY 5, 2022, PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF THE RALPH M. BROWN ACT
WHEREAS, the City of Beaumont (the "City") is committed to preserving and nurturing public access and participation in meetings of the City Council; and WHEREAS, all meetings of the City's legislative bodies are open and public, as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act (Cal. Gov. Code §§ 54950 — 54963) (the "Brown Act"), so that any member of the public may attend, participate, and watch the City's legislative bodies conduct their business; and
WHEREAS, the Brown Act, Government Code section 54953(e), makes provisions for remote teleconferencing participation in meetings by members of a legislative body, without compliance with the requirements of Government Code section 54953(b)(3), subject to the existence of certain conditions; and
WHEREAS, a required condition is that a state of emergency is declared by the Governor pursuant to Government Code section 8625, proclaiming the existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state caused by conditions as described in Government Code section 8558; and
WHEREAS, a proclamation is made when there is an actual incident, threat of disaster, or extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the jurisdictions that are within the City's boundaries, caused by natural, technological, or human -caused disasters; and WHEREAS, it is further required that state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing, or, the legislative body meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety of attendees; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously adopted Resolution 2021-66 on December 7, 2021, finding that the requisite conditions exist for the legislative bodies of the City to conduct remote teleconference meetings without compliance with Government Code section 54953(b)(3); and
WHEREAS, as a condition of extending the use of the provisions found in Government Code section 54953(e), the City Council must reconsider the circumstances of the state of emergency that exists in the City, and the City Council has done so; and WHEREAS, emergency conditions persist in the City, specifically, on March 4, 2020, the Governor of the State of California proclaimed a State of Emergency to exist in California as a 52 Item 3.
result of the threat of COVID-19; despite sustained efforts the virus continues to spread and is impacting nearly all sectors of California; and
WHEREAS, on June 9, 2021, the California Department of Public Health issued updated public health directives related to physical distancing and face coverings effective June 15, 2021, based on guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and WHEREAS, on or about July 28, 2021, Riverside County Public Health stated that "in light of the recent increase in local COVID-19 cases, Riverside County Public Health recommends residents follow the new state and federal guidance for face coverings. The current state and federal masking guidance recommend that vaccinated individuals wear face masks in public indoor settings. The state still requires unvaccinated individuals to wear masks indoors;" this remains the guidance of Riverside County Public Health; and
WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby find that the ongoing risk posed by the highly transmissible COVID-19 virus will continue to cause conditions of peril to the safety of persons within the City which are likely to be beyond the control of services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of the City, and the City Council desires to proclaim a local emergency and ratify the proclamation of state of emergency by the Governor of the State of California; and WHEREAS, as a consequence of the local emergency persisting, the City Council does hereby find that the legislative bodies of the City shall continue to conduct their meetings without compliance with Government Code section 54953(b)(3), as authorized by Government Code section 54953(e), and that such legislative bodies shall continue to comply with the requirements to provide the public with access to the meetings as prescribed in Government Code section 54953(e)(2); and
WHEREAS, all meeting agendas stating meeting dates, times and the manner in which the public may attend and offer public comment by call -in option or internet-based service option shall be posted, at a minimum, on the City's website and at the City's main office.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals.
The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by this reference.
Section 2. Affirmation that Local Emergency Persists.
The City Council hereby considers the conditions of the state of emergency in the City and proclaims that a local emergency persists throughout the City, and the ongoing risk posed by the highly transmissible COVID-19 virus has caused, and will continue to cause, conditions of peril to the safety of persons within the City; furthermore, the guidance of Riverside County Public Health recommends physical distancing and face coverings. 53 Item 3.
Section 3. Re -ratification of Governor's Proclamation of a State of Emergency.
The City Council hereby ratifies the Governor of the State of California's Proclamation of State of Emergency, effective as of its issuance date of March 4, 2020.
Section 4. Remote Teleconference Meetings.
The Mayor, the City Manager, and legislative bodies of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of this Resolution including conducting open and public meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e) and other applicable provisions of the Brown Act.
Section 5. Effective Date.
This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and shall be effective until the earlier of (i) February 5, 2022, or such time the City Council adopts a subsequent resolution in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e)(3) to extend the time during which the legislative bodies of the City may continue to teleconference without compliance with Government Code section 54953(b)(3).
Section 6. Certification.
The Clerk of the City Council shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause the same to be processed in the manner required by law.
PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED, this 4th day of January 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Lloyd White, Mayor
ATTEST:
Nicole Wheelwright, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
John O. Pinkney, City Attorney
54 Item 4.
BEAUMONTA -C A L I F O R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Doug Story, Asst. Director of Community Services
DATE January 4, 2022
SUBJECT: Consider Adopting a Resolution Waiving the Monthly Facility Use at the Albert A. Chatigny Sr. Community Recreation Center (CRC) for Beaumont Community Youth Basketball (BCYB)
Background and Analysis:
Beaumont Community Youth Basketball (BCYB) is a non-profit community organization that provides up to 500 children ages 5 through high school ages the opportunity to participate in basketball. The league operates at the Albert A. Chatigny Sr. Community Recreation Center (CRC) and allows children to develop basketball skills and provides opportunities for personal growth and development for young athletes while reinforcing positive influences, self-confidence, self-esteem, and a healthy physical lifestyle through sports. BCYB has been operating in the community for many years and has developed a strong reputation in the community. Due to COVID-19 restrictions, previous seasons were postponed, the Winter 2022 season is an opportunity for BCYB to restart operations in the community.
Staff received a Facility Use Application from BCYB and reviewed the request to use the facility (Attachment B). The league has requested use of the facility gymnasium, restrooms, and kitchen from January 31, 2022, through April 2, 2022, for a total of 252 hours. Practices will be held on Monday through Thursday evenings from 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. with games on Friday evenings from 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. and Saturdays from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. BCYB has formally requested (Attachment C) to have facility use fees waived in the amount of $15,100.
Fiscal Impact:
BCYB is requesting a waiver of facility use fees for their proposed use schedule in the amount of $15,100. Operation of a snack bar at the facility during games will continue to be paid by BCYB and is not included in the waiver request. 55 Item 4.
Recommended Action:
Waive the full reading and approve by title only, "A Resolution of the City of Beaumont authorizing the waiver of monthly facility use fees at the Albert A.
Chatigny Sr. Community Recreation Center (CRC) for Beaumont Community Youth Basketball (BCYB)."
Attachments:
A. Resolution
B. Facility Use Application
C. Fee Waiver Request
56 Item 4.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT AUTHORIZING
THE WAIVER OF MONTHLY FACILITY USE AND STAFF FEES
AT THE ALBERT A. CHATIGNY SR. COMMUNITY
RECREATION CENTER (CRC) FOR BEAUMONT COMMUNITY
YOUTH BASKETBALL
WHEREAS, Beaumont Community Youth Basketball is a non-profit community organization that provides up to 500 children ages 5 through high school ages the opportunity to participate in basketball and develop social, physical, and personal growth; and
WHEREAS, Beaumont Community Youth Basketball provides development for young athletes while reinforcing positive influences, self-confidence, self-esteem, and a healthy physical lifestyle through sports; and
WHEREAS, Beaumont Community Youth Basketball needs a space within the Albert A.
Chatigny Sr. Community Recreation Center (CRC) to hold their practices and games and has requested a fee waiver for the facility use fees; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to waive facility use fees for Beaumont Community Youth Basketball as it serves a public interest.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Beaumont does authorize a fee waiver of facility use fees for Beaumont Community Youth Basketball's use of the Albert A.
Chatigny Sr. Community Recreation Center until April 15, 2022, and finds that the fee waiver serves a valid public purpose in that the fee waiver will support the betterment of residents and youth within the Beaumont community.
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of January 2022.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
By:
Lloyd White, Mayor, City of Beaumont
1 57
Item 4.
ATTEST:
Nicole Wheelwright, Deputy City Clerk
By:
2 Item 4.
BEAUMONT
c aL, a n R f9 i A
CITY OF BEAUMONT
550 E. bth Street
Phone (951 ) 769-8520
BeaumontCa.gov
-S6
PrintName: /\ � A1J' 't
Street Address: Po. go i 2 t
Zip: J 22-23 Telephone: 1757-515 `711
411AZ.
Signature of Person Responsible (must be 18 years of age) City:
Date:
FACILITY RENTAL
APPLICATION
/7 DtfG 202-/
**The City reserves the right to revoke this permit at any time** YOUR DEPOSIT IS REQUIRED TO RESERVE YOUR DATE. FEE BALANCE (IF APPLICABLE) WILL BE DUE AT TIME OF KEY PICK UP - CHECK OR CREDIT CARDS ONLY.
Please initial to accept below terms:
Sta(f (Civic Center, CRC)
There will be a charge of $20.00 per hour of use for a City employee to open the building, be present during your activity and to close the building when your activity is finished. 71-14 '.I PLOM NOTAEsPoNsmEFQR L4 1V VP.
Deposit:
PYAN A deposit to hold the facility is required of $500.00 for the GYM: $45.00 for the Meeting Rooms.
This deposit must be paid, and the application form submitted to reserve the date for your e nt
Ie c, $500.00 cleaning deposit which is refundable when the facility is left clean and no damage occurs. If you do not clean the facility, and there are damages, your deposit will be retained to cover the cost, and you will be liable for any expenses incurred over and above the deposit paid. Cleaning includes the hallway and the restrooms.
Sg_urity Guards:
7L1‘N.,Security Guards are required, the number to be determined by the Beaumont Police Department for Civic Center or CRC. (# of guards on all facility rentals are subject to approval by the Beaumont Police Department). Arrangements may be made with a private security firm. A copy of the contract must be provided to this office.
THE GUARD. MUST BE LICEN ED, BQNQED AND,1N UNIFORM.
Aoholic Beverages:
lY14'Special arrangements can be made to sell alcohol in the Civic Center for nonprofit agencies with approval from the Community Service Department and /or the Chief of Police. ALCOTOL. IS NOT ALLOWED FOR PARTIES OF UNDER AGED PERSONS) (21 biz OLDER ONLY).
59 Item 4.
BEAUMONT
-.-f. A �- i F V k N A
CITY OF BEAUMONT
550 E. 6th Street
Phone (951) 769-8520
BeaumontCa.gov
FACILITY RENTAL
APPLICATION
Location: ..,... �� �i6�1�^►
g CHATIGNY REC CENTER 'J CIVIC CENTER Room(s) number: / Date(s) of Use:
krI 31 — e 2 f� Period of use: 7 One Time EV/Weekly E " Ionthly 7—I�'�i zi-2t1.2t/PA.1'3,,7-1 ; 1/.2,'
Other:_Mkt)�r11 x/
� 3l �' i/ -I
Open Building: _ am/pm Close Building: f am/p �!' /
Starting Time: C am,J Ending Time: 7 am/
Equipment Needed for Meeting/Usage: fir Chairs teft Tables U Other:
Name of Organization/Group: g M
Nam �
r.
/001+ etP/oia h'ily 1/64 411,44411(eq-06)
Purpose of Meeting/Usage: -*ANA frig G 11 66-5 Afc N " Via 4' 1 PI'S `4 Expected Attendance: ps? r 1�v��'� Open to the Public? ] Yes '-No
ALL PERSONS UTILIZING CITY FACILITIES SHALL ABIDE BY ALL CITY RULES AND ORDINANCES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
1. Applicant is responsible for leaving facilities in the same conditions as received: for cleanliness; and turning off all utilities.
2. It is understood and agreed that the applicant shall be solely responsible for the activities conducted by it or subject to its controls, and applicant agrees to and does here hold the City harmless from any and all liability or alleged liability arising out of, or in any way related to, the activities by said applicant: and in the event suit is brought arising out of any such activities, applicant will defend the City and pay any and all attorney fees and Court cost incurred in such suit.
3. Alcohol is not permitted in the Civic Center/CRC facilities unless you have provided proof of security. Security guards must be present entire time alcohol is being served.
4. Night and weekend use of the Beaumont Facilities will be by special arrangement only, with additional payment required for a City employee to be present in the building for the full length of your use.
5. A cleaning and damage deposit is required.
6. Events at the CRC that use the overflow parking lot at night will be required to rent a light tower for their event. The light must be turned off by 10pm.
Special Notes:
60 Item 4.
CITY OF BEAUMONT
550 E. 6th Street
BEAUMONT Phone (91511 ) 769-8520
A t, I F it H N f A.,._. BeaumontCa.goV
Location:
CHATIGNY REC CENTER U CIVIC CENTER
FACILITY RENTAL
APPLICATION
Room(s) number: at/ AI 1Q' ift)11 '
Date(s) of U e: 1 a ki - qtr Period of use: One Time X Weekly ET Monthly Other: PreZ i igt 24.4 PM 5, /27 11I V; Ji f r 2 -
Open Building: am/pm Close Building: am/pm
Starting Time: 7 0/pm Ending Time: q am
Equipment Needed for Meeting/Usage: 3( Chairs '4 Tables Other: 6'h Ai t~ GL -e) t 4L Name of Organization/Group:
Purpose of Meeting/Usage:
Expected Attendance: L? 0 Icier /OP A t" Open to the Public? `6g Yes No
ALL PERSONS UTILIZING CITY FACILITIES SHALL ABIDE BY ALL CITY RULES AND ORDINANCES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
1. Applicant is responsible for leaving facilities in the same conditions as received: for cleanliness; and turning off all utilities.
2. It is understood and agreed that the applicant shall be solely responsible for the activities conducted by it or subject to its controls, and applicant agrees to and does here hold the City harmless from any and all liability or alleged liability arising out of, or in any way related to, the activities by said applicant: and in the event suit is brought arising out of any such activities, applicant will defend the City and pay any and all attorney fees and Court cost incurred in such suit.
3. Alcohol is not permitted in the Civic Center/CRC facilities unless you have provided proof of security. Security guards must be present entire time alcohol is being served.
4. Night and weekend use of the Beaumont Facilities will be by special arrangement only, with additional payment required for a City employee to be present in the building for the full length of your use.
5. A cleaning and damage deposit is required.
6. Events at the CRC that use the overflow parking lot at night will be required to rent a light tower for their event. The light must be turned off by lOpm.
Special Notes:
61 Item 4.
BCYB PROJECTED SEASON SCHEDULE 2021-22
PRACTICES & GAMES
PRACTICES: MON-THU, *FRI, 5pm — 9pm
JAN 31
FEB 1 - 4, 7-10, 14-17, 21-24, 28
MAR 1 - 3, 7-10, 14-17, 21-24, 28-31
GAMES: FRI, 5pm — 9:OOpm
FRIDAYS: FEB 11, 18, 25 MAR 4, 114, 18, 25
APR 1
GAMES: SAT, 7am — 4:OOpm
SATURDAYS: FEB 12, 19, 26 MAR 5, 12, 19, 26 APR 2
WAIVE FEE KITCHEN USE: FRI & SAT
Note: We only use the kitchen area to sell snacks, nonalcoholic drinks, and heat up hot dogs and pop popcorn in the microwave. We do not use the stove or oven. We also keep ice paks in the refrigerator for first aide purposes.
Roy Mickles
President, BCYB
Ph# 951-575-7172
62 BEAUMONT
Caki.�o�uua
Item 4.
CITY OF BEAUMONT
550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, CA 92223
Phone (951) 769-8520 Fax (951) 769-8526
www.Beaumont-Ca.gov
Date: December 20, 2021
DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY RECREATION
CENTER USAGE FOR YOUTH BASKETBALL
WINTER PROGRAM 2022
From:
Community Services Dept
1310 Oak Valley Pkwy
Beaumont, California 92223
(951) 769-8524
Fax : (951) 769-8519
To: Beaumont Community Youth Basketball
Roy Mickles
[email protected]
Purpose/Location: Dates: Times: Building rental: Staff fees:
Practices/Gym 37 dates 5pm-9pm $7,400.00 $2,960.00
Jan 31, Feb 1,2,3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 21, 22, 23, 24, 28 Mar 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 28, 29, 30, 31
Games/Gym 8 dates 5pm-9pm
Fridays Feb 11, 18, 25, Mar 4, 11, 18, 25, Apr 1
Games/Gym 8 dates 7am-4pm
Saturdays Feb 12, 19, 26, Mar 5, 12, 19, 26, Apr 2
Kitchen 16 dates
Fridays Feb 11, 18, 25, Mar 4, 11, 18, 25, Apr 1
Saturdays Feb 12, 19, 26, Mar 5, 12, 19, 26, Apr 2
Total
Deposit
TOTAL FEES DUE
$1,600.00
$3,200.00
$2,400.00
$14,600.00
$500.00
$20,140.00
$640.00
$1,440.00
$5,040.00
Incorporated November 18, 191
63 Item 4.
Beaumont Community Youth Basketball
P.O. Box 3126
Beaumont, CA 92223
Phone: (951) 575-7172
September 7, 2021
To: City of Beaumont
Attn: Beaumont City Council
Thru: Albert Chatigny Sr. Community Center1310
Oak Valley Pkwy
Beaumont CA 92223
SUBJECT: REQUEST TO WAIVE FEES IN EXCESS OF THE $20 PER HOUR ADMIN FEE Beaumont Community Youth Basketball, Inc. aka BCYB
501(c)(3)
Entity # 3060139
FEIN: 26-1339390
COMMUNITY VALUES, INTEGRITY, LEADERSHIP
Beaumont Community Youth Basketball (BCYB) is a non-profit community organization that can provide up to 500 children ages 5 thru High School the opportunity to participate in basketball. The league is open to children of all skill levels in the city of Beaumont and surrounding areas. Beaumont Community Youth Basketball strives to provide opportunities for personal growth and development of youth athletes, while reinforcing positive influences, self-confidence, self-esteem, and the ability to excel on and off the court.
BCYB is dedicated to educating and motivating each participating member while encouraging teamwork, sportsmanship, and fun through the spirit of basketball. All of our directors, coaches, and staff are volunteers charged with always conducting themselves as ethical role models focused on the welfare of the children of our community. Character development is stressed through teamwork and sportsmanship remembering that the primary goal is for the children to have fun!
OTHER PROGRAMS
Currently, BCYB is not an AAU or other style private program which seeks athletes of a specific skill set and limits registration based on physical or some mental limitations and attributes. Every child and family is welcome to participate who will abide by basic codes of conduct. Note: We very clearly understand that Beaumont is unique as its own city, however, these similarly operating counterpart programs such as Yucaipa, 29 Palms, and Needles all have some no cost agreements in place for their youth sports program facilities. It would be beneficial to have a noncomplex standing MOU in place which limits fees to a fixed rate and/or limits what rate fees can be raised to every third year or otherwise.
Any approach should be reasonable and practical in the interest of all parties; yet not discouraging and dismantling of a program due to a singular interest which disregards the wholesomeness that a program like BCYB provides in connecting a community from its core roots, its youth and families. 64 Item 4.
OTHER BCYB COMMUNITY VALUE
College Scholarship Awards — the league annually participates with Beaumont Unified School District in Sr. Awards night at Beaumont High School. The league awards approximately 3-8 eligible high school seniors receive monetary scholarships towards college or other higher learning institutions to further their education. These families have volunteered countless years and time to the success of the BCYB community program.
Generally three to 8 high school seniors receive in excess of $3,500 collectively. This is not done by any other youth sports organization within the Beaumont community (football, soccer, baseball, gymnastics, etc.)
Letters of Recommendation — youth and parents who serve faithfully can receive letters of recommendations for job employment.
BCYB financially employs community school aged youth during its Fall/Winter Season — youth begin to work in various stages of the program on a rotational basis from October thru March.
BCYB does no cost participant scholarships on a case -by -case basis to be determined by the league board, and often has program participation from special needs kids from local group homes and temporary adoption families. We also work payment plans for 24% of league families.
BCYB CHATIGNY COMMUNITY CENTER CONTRIBUTIONS
The league follows all community center policies and guidelines to the best of our ability. In order to maintain seasonal continuity of gym operational flow, the league actively assist with consulting subject matter experts if equipment or other issues occur, and readily assist financially with cost and repair of equipment, goals, bleachers, etc. though BCYB is not a year-round occupant of the facility.
CURRENT PROPOSED FEE RATES BY THE CITY OF BEAUMONT ARE NOT SUSTAINABLE BCYB currently functions as a 10-1 lweek program by age group. This is a holiday program which crosses over between Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year's which is generally the most financially challenging part of the year for most families. We are now going from approximately $8,400 to $31,840 per short season.
This is an increase of more than $23,400 per season. So, what is the value or benefit of our nonprofit status if we are in the same tier fee rate as any other for-profit private organization. This fee has quadrupled. The simple analogy is this; milk simply doesn't go from $5.00 to $20.00 in one year, nor does our property tax base go from $8,000 annually to a sudden $31,000 annually. Inflation happens over an incremental period to be somewhat sustainable.
Demographics: Population: 48,237 Median Family Size: 3.25 Households: 15,000 Median Family Income: $79,800. This is not -necessarily a representation of single parent income which is generally substantially less.
At this time, it is unknown what a new pre/post pandemic will look like for BCYB from a public health trust standpoint. Registrations are expected to be dramatically down for indoor sports, especially for our program which encompasses 5-7 year old's as 1/3 of the total program. Setting prices based on the new fee hikes will increase fees in a way that discourages all around participation in an already lees than safe pandemic environment. The BCYB board can't commit to any excessive price increase and risk defaulting on a debt owed and losing its long-time good standing in the City of Beaumont due to unrealistic expectations from an uncertain future of the ability to conduct normal program business operations. We are exceptional as one of the few programs that are willing to offer an outlet to channel the range of emotions associated with high school kids, but we readily accept this challenge through coaching and mentoring. Our experience shows that the higher the cost, many high school parents drop off in support of their kids' activities primarily in the 5-7 and 14-18 age group. They are the most high -risk group in the program. 65 Item 4.
Any community would prefer to have those kids in the gym, rather than aimlessly roaming the streets.
BCYB "PRE -PANDEMIC" 2019-20 ESTIMATED PROFITABLE IMPACT ON BEAUMONT'S
ECONOMY
BCYB Annual Basketball Tournament — this event host teams from surrounding cities and out of state for 2-3 days during the 2nd or 3rd week of March. Event encompasses 35 plus teams of 350 plusplayers. This does not include family members and friends attending the program special event.
Cities include: Redondo Beach, Big Bear, Needles, Bullhead, AZ, Las Vegas, NV, 29 Palms, Yucca Valley, San Bernardino, Hemet, Banning, and various private teams and organizations. During this event, City of Beaumont hotels are booked out almost completely for the weekend. All of the cities restaurants, stores, gas stations, and other offerings are patronized as well. Hotel group rate are coordinated by the visiting cities coordinators for approximately 250-300 out of towners averaging up to 100k for the weekend; with total visitors of 800 or more people. All other community activities and conveniences for MEALS & INCIDENTALS per diems for Riverside County $66 per day per person. Average 2 --- 4 persons per family for a 2 or 3 day stay in Beaumont can equal $264 to $568, Avg. = $416 for the weekend tournament per family. The average numberof basketballs outside visitors in Beaumont for that weekend 650 — 850 individuals.
Using 250 families times M & I @ $416 = $104,000.
March 15-17, 2019 Hotel = $83, 000 + M&I = $104, 000 Economic Value Est: $187, 000+ BCYB "POST -PANDEMIC" ESTIMATED PROFITABLE IMPACT ON BEAUMONT'S ECONOMY The BCYB Board has contacted and surveyed our tournament counterparts throughout different cities. At this time there is no projected travel for tournaments. Like us, they are still struggling with the ability to put together a safe local community basketball season. As an example, Twentynine Palms has projected no indoor community basketball, and at this time Redondo Beach Youth Basketball is still debating foregoing this season. Again, this further illustrates why any impractical fee hikes present a disastrous outcome for strong participation at least until Fall 2023 as an intelligent estimate. We hope and pray for better sooner.
We as an organization must have better long-term support from our city in order sustain a healthy and robust program designed for kids who the majority will never experience playing for a middle or high school team. Their families deserve to watch them bounce their first ball with a uniform on. It's been a joy to personally watch 2 decades of kids who played in the program, who are now adults with children themselves, now coaching, and their parents are now the grandparents in the stands getting this wonderful experience all over again in their later years because we are still here for them. BCYB wasn't a good idea, it was a vision that put pen to paper with the intent to last and exist as the city does, and even beyond. Rates were held at $140 from 2015 to 2019, at the beginning of 2019-20 rates were increased to $170 due to some budgetary increase concerns regarding the city and inflation. The impact was registrations dropped by at least 76 participants from an average 432 to 356. This number will continue to drop especially if we increase facility cost by another estimated $23,400+ excluding kitchen fees TBD during these unpredictable times.
POC is the undersigned at (951) 575-7172.
Sincerely,
- \17)
oy Mickles
President, Beaumont Community Youth Basketball
66 Item 5.
BEAUMONTA -C A L I F O R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Nicole Wheelwright, Deputy City Clerk
DATE January 4, 2022
SUBJECT: Notice of Upcoming Vacancy on the Beaumont Planning Commission
Background and Analysis:
City Council has received notice of resignation from Planning Commissioner Paul St.
Martin. Mr. St. Martin has served on the Planning Commission for 13 years cumulatively. A notice of a partial -term vacancy will be published in the local newspaper and the City's social media platforms. Applications will be due on January 25, 2022, for consideration of appointment by the City Council on February 1, 2022.
Fiscal Impact:
City staff estimated the cost to prepare this report to be $95.
Recommended Action:
Direct staff to notice the upcoming vacancy of one seat with a partial term on the Beaumont Planning Commission.
Attachments:
A. Notice of Vacancy
67 Item 5.
Notice of Vacancy for a Partial Term on the Beaumont Planning Commission Beaumont, CA —Notice is hereby given that the Beaumont City Council is seeking to fill one (1) vacancy on the Beaumont Planning Commission.
This is a partial term through December 31, 2022. The Planning Commission instructs the Community Development Department to exercise administrative duties where applicable including the determination of plot plans, variances and conditional use permits. The Commission conducts public hearings to consider and make recommendations to the City Council regarding general plan amendments, zone changes, zone variances, and specific plans, tentative parcel maps and tentative tract maps. The Commission considers appeals of determinations made by the Community Development Director regarding site plan reviews, signage plans, and temporary use permits.
Applications are available online at www.BeaumontCa.gov under Committees and Commission. The Beaumont City Council will conduct a review of applicants at the regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, February 1, 2022, at 6:00 p.m. Completed applications received by 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 25, 2022, will be considered. Questions regarding the application process may be directed to the Deputy City Clerk at (951) 572-3196.
68 Item 6.
BEAUMONTA -C A L I F O R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Kyle Warsinski, Economic Development Manager
DATE January 4, 2022
SUBJECT: City of Beaumont Grant Policies and Procedures Background and Analysis:
The purpose of the grant procedures outlined in the proposed document are:
1. To ensure proper oversight of all funds awarded to the City,
2. To minimize the City's risk of losing funding due to non-compliance with grant requirements, and
3. To ensure proper administration and accounting of all grants.
This policy is applicable to any City of Beaumont program, department, or fund division preparing and submitting grant applications to agencies outside the City government for funds, materials, or equipment to be received and administered by the City or by an entity for which the City acts as fiscal agent. The goals and objectives of the City departments should be established early in the planning process and should not change based on changes in the availability of different funding sources sought and received. If grant policies and regulations conflict with regulations and policies of the City,the federal and state regulations will prevail unless they are less restrictive than City policies where City policy prevails.
No grant will be accepted that will incur management reporting costs greater than the grant amount. Such costs include, but are not limited to, indirect costs, overhead and any other items needed to administer the grant.
The main highlights of the proposed Grant Policies and Procedures are as follows:
1. Create a central responsibility for the management and reporting of all grants,
2. Establish Grant Application Procedures, including City Manager approval prior to grant application submittals,
3. Establish procedures for acceptance of Grants,
4. Creation of a grant master file and fiscal file to assist in management and reporting,
69 Item 6.
5. Establish detailed guidelines for grant reporting and monitoring,
6. Establish procedures for grants involving personnel,
7. Establish procurement rules to ensure compliance with grantor entities,
8. Fiscal year-end procedures,
9. A process for grant closeouts, and
10. Detailed federal grant procurement policy.
Fiscal Impact:
City staff estimates the cost to prepare this report is $400.
Recommended Action:
Approve the proposed City of Beaumont Grant Policies and Procedures.
Attachments:
A. City of Beaumont Grant Policies and Procedures
70 BEAUMONT
-CALIFORNIA-
Grant Policies and Procedures
Item 6.
Contents
SECTION 1:
SECTION 2:
SECTION 3:
SECTION 4:
SECTION 5:
SECTION 6:
SECTION 7:
SECTION 8:
SECTION 9:
SECTION 10:
SECTION 11:
SECTION 12:
SECTION 13:
SECTION 14:
SECTION 15:
DEFINITION AND PURPOSE
SCOPE
CENTRAL RESPONSIBILITY
3 3
4 4
6 7
8 10
10 11
13 13
14 14
28 GRANT APPLICATION PROCEDURES
GRANT ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURES
GRANT MASTER FILE AND FISCAL FILE
GRANT MONITORING AND REPORTING
INDIRECT COSTS
PERSONNEL
GRANT -RELATED PROCUREMENT AND POLICY ISSUES
CLASSIFICATION OF GRANT REVENUE
YEAR-END PROCEDURES
GRANT CLOSEOUT
DETAILED FEDERAL GRANT PROCUREMENT POLICY
CITY MANAGER EXEMPTION
2 72
Item 6.
City of Beaumont
Grant Policies and Procedures
Administrative Services Department
SECTION 1:
DEFINITION AND PURPOSE
The definition of a grant for purposes of this policy is as follows: An award of financial assistance in the form of money or property by a funding source including the federal government, state government, other local governments, non-profit agencies, and private businesses and citizens that the City can accept or reject.
The purpose of the grant procedures outlined in this document is:
1. To ensure proper oversight of all funds awarded to the City.
2. To minimize the City's risk of losing funding due to non-compliance with grant requirements.
3. To ensure proper administration and accounting of all grants.
SECTION 2: SCOPE
This policy is applicable to any City of Beaumont program, department, or fund division preparing andsubmitting grant applications to agencies outside the City government for funds, materials, or equipment to be received and administered by the City or by an entity for which the City acts as fiscal agent. The goals and objectives of the City departments should be established early in the planning process and should not change based on changes in the availability of different funding sources sought and received. If grant policies and regulations conflict with regulations and policies of the City,the federal and state regulations will prevail unless they are less restrictive than City policies where City policy prevails.
No grant will be accepted that will incur management reporting costs greater than the grant amount. Such costs include, but are not limited to, indirect costs, overhead and any other items needed to administer the grant.
3 73
Item 6.
SECTION 3: CENTRAL RESPONSIBILITY
The City Council authorizes the Administrative Services Director and Finance Director to promulgate any procedures and controls that minimize the City's risk for non-compliance with grant requirements and the Administrative Services Director or their assigned designee for providing support to requesting agencies. The Administrative Services Department will maintain the back-up file for all grants in order to facilitate management, reporting and overall monitoring. The required central grant file will be maintained by the department seeking grant funds and must be retained in accordance with City of Beaumont retention policy.
For Federal Grants, the Department applying for the grant and the Finance Department should ensure compliance with the Federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) general requirements and any other state and/or federal requirements specified in the grant conditions.
The Administrative Services Department and Finance Department will review expenditures for obvious non-compliance and will act as liaison with independent auditors. All City programs, departments, and fund divisions shall submit any/all grant information required by the Administrative Services Department to carry out its oversight responsibilities.
SECTION 4: GRANT APPLICATION PROCEDURES
4.1 The City program, department, or fund division desiring to submit a grant application soliciting funds will prepare the request as outlined by the grantor's requirements. Grant applications will be reviewed by the department(s) seeking grant(s) in order to make an independent assessment of all financial aspects of the application to ensure funds availability. The department director should sign the grant application as approval that funds are available and that they are supportive of the fiscal impacts to their department. The department applying for the grant should make every effort to project all initial and ongoing costs associated with the grant program including but not limited to staff support, needed assistance for computer systems, office space, utilities, systems furniture, vehicles, office equipment, office supplies, computer software and hardware, and/or telephone charges.
4.2 Upon the department completing its financial assessment, they shall prepare and submit a Grant Processing Request Form (Appendix A) to the Administrative Services Department with the original grant application, along with any required assurances and conditions prior to submitting the application to the grantor entity for approval. This Form must be approved by the City Manager prior to the grant application being submitted. The purpose of this from 74 4
Item 6.
notification to Administration is to eliminate duplication of submissions by City departments for the same grant, to allow Administrative Services to maintain a comprehensive list of pending grant applications as well as active grants, to provide assistance as appropriate to departments in the preparation and administration of grants, and to ensure availability of matching funds, where applicable. The Administrative Services department will obtain the City Manager's approval and notify the department that the application has been approved. Administrative Services will also send a Memorandum of Understanding, if necessary, on the grant's requirements to the department applying for the grant and will assist departments on inquiries concerning compliance issues.
4.3 The Administrative Services Department will request additional information or revised submittals if needed. The Administrative Services and Finance Departments will work with the departments to ensure the availability of funds. For those grant applications where a Grant Processing Request Form has not been submitted within a reasonable time, Administrative Services will follow up with the applicable department to see that the proper procedures are followed. Grant applications shall not be submitted to the grantor entity prior to the Administrative Services Department receiving and the City Manager approving the Grant Process Request Form. In some cases, the grant application shall not be submitted until approved by the City Council.
4.4 Any grant pertaining to technology will be required to complete a Technology Service Request (Appendix B) Form and forward it to the Administrative Services Department before applying for the grant. City of Beaumont's Software/Hardware standards and IT staffing must be considered for any software/hardware purchases. IT staff must make assurances that any equipment/software purchased will be technologically compatible and can be supported in years to come.
4.5 If the grant is incorporated into the Adopted City of Beaumont Budget and appropriated, then no additional Board approval is required for the application and acceptance of the grant, unless otherwise required by individual grant requirements. However, supporting documentation to assist in monitoring of the grant shall be forwarded to the Administrative Services Department for their records.
4.6 All grant award acceptances must have approval from the City Manager and/or the City Council, 75 5
Item 6.
under the provisions of the limits established in the City of Beaumont Purchasing Policy. This action may involve preparation of a City Council agenda item for inclusionon the next regular meeting agenda for consideration. In order for an item to be considered at a board meeting, the department must forward the required staff report and any necessary documentation to the City Clerk's office in accordance with the City's agenda procedures. Please refer to the City Council calendar or consult with the City Clerk's office for additional information on the agenda deadlines. In the event that a grant cannot be presented at City Council due to a short timeline, staff is required to bring the grant to city Council at the first available meeting for ratification.
4.7 If a grant application is denied by the grantor, a copy of the letter of denial shall be forwarded to the Administrative Services Department for their records. In addition to the letter of denial, the department which submitted the grant shall draft and submit a summary of the denial to the Administrative Services Department for their records.
SECTION 5: GRANT ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURES
5.1 Whenever possible, all requests for acceptance of grants of a recurring nature should be submitted to the Finance Department through the normal budget process that must be approved by the City Council.
5.2 The grant award letter/acceptance agreement (notification received detailing the amount of the grant awarded, grant assurances and special conditions, and the guidelines that must be followed to comply with the grant requirements) will be forwarded to the Administrative Services Department,who will review the grant award for reporting requirements, special conditions, and deadlines related to administering the grant.
5.3 If deemed necessary by Administrative Services Director and time permits, the Administrative Services Department may forward the grant award letter/agreement to the City Attorney for legal review of any clauses or grant special conditions to ensure compliance with Federal or state laws.
5.4 In order for expenditures to be processed against a grant, a budget appropriation must be established using procedures and limits set forth in the City of Beaumont Financial Management Policy. The department requesting a grant will work with the Finance Department to prepare a City Council agenda item requesting appropriation of grant funds, unless the grant 76 6
Item 6.
has already been approved by the City Council as part of the adopted annual budget process.
5.5 Upon obtaining a copy of the Council action approving a grant, the Finance Department will assign an account code to the grant and the applicable department will be notified of the account code. For reimbursable grants, all reimbursement requests should be copied and forwarded to Administrative Services and Finance Departments, noting the applicable account code for the receipting of the funds. The Finance Department will notify the departments of such anticipated receipts of revenue for those reimbursements made to the City. The Finance Department will track receipts for reporting with annual audits.
5.6 Departments should notify the Administrative Services and Finance Departments if:
A. There is a subsequent alteration in the funding configuration.
B. There is a subsequent alteration in the City's financial obligation.
C. Grant funds will be carried forward into the next fiscal year.
D. There is any notification that the grant will be terminated.
5.7 Departments shall process Personnel action/status forms at year end for those grants that have new account numbers each year, to eliminate necessary future adjustments.
5.8 Departments are responsible for ensuring that all funds are expended or encumbered prior to the end of the grant period, for funds to be used adequately and not lost in future award periods.
SECTION 6:
6.1 Grant Master File
GRANT MASTER FILE AND FISCAL FILE
The program manager is required to maintain a grant master file in order to document all major actions from the grant award through closeout. The master file should include the following documents:
A. Grant Application: Funding opportunity announcement and the original grant application that was submitted to the awarding agency.
7 77
Item 6.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Grant Award Documents: Grant award, terms and conditions, assurances, award modifications, and approved Request for Council Action (RCA) for the acceptance of the award. Also include subrecipient agreement if portion of the award was transferred to a subrecipient.
Financial Documents: Approved budget and budget amendments.
Grant Reports: Periodic and Final Financial and/or Performance reports including any communications regarding these reports.
Grant Reimbursement/Payment Requests: Reimbursement/Payment Request form, supporting documents including copy of invoices, copy of transmittal letter, copy of check payment or EFT notification, and copy of Deposit Transmittal Form (DTF).
General Communications: Internal or external communications pertaining to the grant.
6.2 Fiscal File
To assist in administering the grant, the Administrative Services Department should also maintain a fiscal file. The fiscal file contains all documentation related to the financial history of the grant. To ensure the creation of the fiscal file, the program manager should provide the following documents to Administrative Services:
A. Executed copy of the grant Award and approved RCA
B. Terms & Conditions
C. Award modifications
D. Approved grant budget
E. Budget modifications
F. Financial Reports
G. Reimbursement/Payment Requests and supporting documentation Grant files must be retained in accordance with the City of Beaumont's file retention policy or, for federal awards, the retention requirements for records per 2 CFR 200-333 whichever is more restrictive.
SECTION 7:
7.1 Monitoring of Grants
GRANT MONITORING AND REPORTING
7.1.1 Departments are responsible for continuous monitoring of the financial status of grants.
The Finance Department will provide departments with regular access of monthly financial 8 78
Item 6.
reports for such monitoring. This report will include information, such as money already expended, remaining funding, budget to actual analysis, payments already received, grant receivable or advance payment balance, and if applicable, matching funds already provided. Departments must review the monthly financial reports and notify the Administrative Services and Finance Departments promptly of any discrepancies noted and/or any additional reports needed.
7.1.2 Line -item budget amendments must be approved prior to grant expenditures being made in order to avoid loss of funding or denial of reimbursement. Line -item adjustments must be completed in accordance with the awarding agency's policies and procedures. Line items can go negative, as long as the grant account is not negative in total if the granting entity allows it, but the department should remember that expenditures must be reported to the grantor by line item and must be allowable in the line item reported and spent.
7.1.3 Departments must also monitor grants for compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations and ensure that grant expenditures remain in compliance with grant procurement policies and procedures. For example, equipment procured with grant funds must be disposed of in accordance with the terms of the grant and OMB Circular A-87 requires payroll costs to be supported properly based on the percentage worked on the grant. Federal grants must meet requirements set out in OMB Circulars A-87, A-102, and A-133 or the Uniform Grant Guidance, as applicable. Departments should contact Administrative Services and/or Finance if assistance is needed with compliance issues.
7.1.4 Departments shall require Sub -recipients of grant funds to prepare and submit progress reports to the City. Departments shall notify all sub -recipients of the grant's compliance requirements, reporting requirements, and cost principles. Departments shall establish periodic monitoring meetings with sub -recipients to ensure grant compliance. Sub - recipients shall provide a written acknowledgement that they have received and agree to the items detailed above and any other requirements explained by the City.
7.2 Grant Reporting
7.2.1 The requesting department is responsible for providing performance and financial reports to grantors. If it is determined that the report preparation is to be handled by the Administrative Services or Finance Department, this must be indicated on the Grant Processing Request Form. In some cases, grantors may prohibit the same individual from 79 9
Item 6.
submitting both performance and financial reports. If the program manager identifies this scenario, or something similar they shall notify the Administrative Services Department who will designate a different party to perform the financial report.
7.2.2 Departments handling grant reporting are responsible for complying by the due dates with all reporting requirements of the grant including financial reporting and reimbursement requests. All reimbursement requests should be copied and forwarded to Administrative Services and Finance for review and monitoring of timeliness of revenue reimbursements.
7.2.3 Timely requests for reimbursements are crucial to maximize the financial benefits of the grants to the City. Grant reimbursements should be completed timely and in accordance with the requirements of the specific grant.
SECTION 8: INDIRECT COSTS
Grant applicants may request indirect costs if the application guidelines do not require a federally approved indirect cost rate and indirect cost are allowed in the grant. Departments should contact the Finance Department for assistance with identifying and calculating indirect costs for inclusion in grant applications. These funds may be used by the Finance Department to offset costs in overseeing the grant including staff time, external auditor expenditures, etc.
SECTION 9: PERSONNEL
9.1 Any new personnel positions to be created as a result of grant funding must be approved by the City Manager and City Council, and properly classified by Human Resources. Departments are to promptly notify Payroll each year of coding changes needed for those persons being charged to grants since project/grant codes may change each year. (Coding changes are noted on personnel action/status forms and turned into Human Resources by the applicable departments.) The Department applying for a grant that will create a new position(s) shall prepare a staffing plan and submit such plan to the Administrative Services Department. The staffing plan should include the duration of the position(s) (temporary or permanent), detail the work to performed by the new position(s), and describe how the position(s) will be funded upon the expiration of the grant funding.
9.2 Where employees are 100% federally funded by a grant, salaries and wages will be supported 80 10
Item 6.
by quarterly certifications stating that the employee worked solely on that program for the period covered by the certification. The certification must be signed by the supervisory official having firsthand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Where employees are partially federally funded, their daily tasks must be listed on Daily Activity Logs if provided by the grantor to support the percentage of time spent working on the grant. Distribution percentages determined before the services are performed do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards. For example, someone working 75% out of federal funding and 25% out of local funding must complete the daily activity log to substantiate the percentages.
9.3 Any employee whose salary is paid in part by a grant must develop an activity log that will allow him/her to track actual times and effort performed for the grant. When completing the required bi-weekly timesheet, the employee must itemize time by activity, indicating the account number and for each activity. The program manager will review/sign the timesheet ensuring the following: (1) total hours allocated to the grant based on actual hours recorded in the employee's activity log; and (2) the account numbers and project account codes being used are correct ensuring proper distribution of wages. Once review, the program manager will forward the timesheet to the department head for approval/signature. Once approved by the department head, it will go to Administrative Services Department to the attention of the payroll technician for processing. Personnel costs that are to be funded using Grant funds may not be used for compensatory time.
SECTION 10: GRANT -RELATED PROCUREMENT AND POLICY ISSUES
10.1 Procurement Using Grant Funds
When submitting purchase requisitions with the intention of using grant funds, the department head or program manager must clearly indicate the source of funding for the procurement.
The department head or program manager must also communicate to the Finance Department the applicable procurement standards for the grant preferably via e-mail. The Finance Department must review the grant procurement standards and incorporates them, if necessary, in the procurement process.
10.2 Procurement Using Federal Grant Funds
10.2.1 The Finance Department must be notified that federal funds are involved for all purchases with federally funded grants, regardless of the dollar amount involved. 81 11
Item 6.
All purchases, of any amount, made with federal grant funds must comply with the following requirements detailed in Section 14 below.
10.2.2 If federal funding is involved, the department head, program manager and Finance Department must ensurethe procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR 200-320 and the required suspension and debarment testing- 2 CFR 200-213 - for covered transactions are met. Covered transactions include procurement of goods and services that equal or exceed $25,000, non -procurement transactions as defined in 2 CFR 180.970 and subcontracts/sub awards that equal or exceed $25,000.
10.2.3 List of debarred or excluded vendors can be found in the System for Award Management web page and can be accessed at the following address: http://www.sam.gov . From there, go to Search Records at the top left of the page, and search for your vendor by name. You will receive a message showing whether your vendoris excluded or not. If excluded, you shall not purchase from that source. If there are no records matching the search request, you may purchase from that vendor, assuming all otherpurchasing and grant requirements have been met. In either case, please print out the pagesfor your grant file, to show compliance with this requirement.
10.2.4 A copy of the required certification related to the suspension and disbarment of the vendor MUST be obtained before any funds are spent. The program manager must document the result of thesam.gov search in the grant Master file and fiscal file and be made available to the department head, Administrative Services Department, Finance Department and/or external auditors upon request.
10.2.5 In some cases, the City of Beaumont's procurement standards may be more restrictive than the grant's procurement standards. For example, 2 CFR 200-320 allows the use of procurement by small purchase method when acquiring goods or services that do not cost more than the simplified acquisition threshold (currently at $150,000). In this method of procurement, informal solicitation of price or rate quotes from adequate number of sources is acceptable. However, the City of Beaumont's procurement policy (BMC; Chapter 3) requires an informal competitive bid for purchases between $45,000 and $175,000. In such a circumstance, the program manager must follow the City of Beaumont's procurement standards because it is more restrictive.
10.2.6 The Finance Department also needs to be notified so that assets acquired using Federal funds can be properly identified. Equipment items purchased with federal funds that cost 82 12
Item 6.
$5,000 or more areto be tagged when purchased so that proper disposal procedures can be followed when items are sold or sent to surplus. Federal equipment should be inventoried at least every two years in order to be properly safeguarded against theft, damage, or loss. Inventory records should be maintained in accordance with State Library Regulations. Also, land purchases made with grant funds often haveland use restrictions which will be discussed with the City Attorney's office to ensure restriction compliance.
When assets acquired with Federal funds are no longer used in the grant program (i.e., grant has expired, asset was lost, stolen, or damaged, or asset became idle) the grantor must be notified. The Federal Government may be due a portion of the proceeds for equipment items with abook value of $5,000 or more at the time of disposition. If the federal entity is compensated for the current fair market value of the item, the equipment may be retained by the entity.
10.2.7 Grantees should follow the City's and/or grantor's policies and procedures for all practices includingprocurement for the selection of contractors and vendors. If grant applications have special conditions, a copy of such must be given to the Administrative Services and Finance Departments for assistance in compliance monitoring. If grant guidelines require grantees to abide by different procurement procedures otherthan those adopted by the City, the grantee should resolve the situation with the Finance Department prior to submitting the application. As a rule, the federal and state regulations prevail unless less restrictive than City policies -where City policy prevails.
SECTION 11: CLASSIFICATION OF GRANT REVENUE
All federal, state and local grant revenue should be receipted as revenue as opposed to as expenditure refunds in order to remain in compliance with approved grant policies and GAAP revenue recognitions requirements. Budgets of expenditures for revenues received are obtained through the City of Beaumont Financial Management Policy and as previously described in above paragraphs.
SECTION 12: YEAR-END PROCEDURES
12.1 Indicate clearly on the June and July invoices which fiscal year (prior or current) they are to be posted. Only goods and services received prior to July 1st can be posted back to the prior year. Receipts received in July and August for prior year expenditures should be reconciled promptly.
83 13
Item 6.
12.2 Ensure all funds are expended or encumbered prior to the end of the grant period so that funds will be used adequately and not lost in future award periods.
SECTION 13: GRANT CLOSEOUT
13.1 A grant is considered completed when all work funded by the grant is completed or the grant's period of performance ends. If work cannot be completed within the specified period of performance, the program manager is responsible of ensuring that a continuation or no -cost extension is requested in a timely manner. All continuation or no -cost extension requests should be submitted to the Administrative Services Department for review and approval prior to submitting the request to the grantor.
13.2 Each grant has specific closeout procedures to which the City must adhere to. The closeout documentation and the due dates for submission of required final reports and final payment request arestated in the terms and conditions of the award. The program manager must see to it that all the required work for the grant is completed, no further expenditures are incurred after the grant's periodof performance and all invoices are paid and posted to the accounting software before finalizing the finalfinancial report and the final payment request.
13.3 To ensure accuracy of the final financial report and final payment request, the program manager must obtain a final grant recap from the Finance Department and an account summary report covering the grant's period of performance. These reports must be reviewed and reconciled. Once the final financial report and final payment request have been prepared, it will be submitted to the department head or appropriate City management personnel for review to ensure they are mathematically accurate and supporting documentation agrees to the final financial report/final payment request. The department head or City management personnel will send the program manager an email indicating review and approval of the prepared final financial report/final payment request.
13.4 The program manager is responsible for complying with the due dates specified in the award terms and conditions.
SECTION 14: DETAILED FEDERAL GRANT PROCUREMENT POLICY
14.1 Purpose
The City of Beaumont is a potential recipient of Federal Grant Funds and as such, is required to confirm with Federal laws and standards identified in 2 CFR 200.318-326. Therefore, 84 14
Item 6.
procurements in which federal funds are contemplated or used must be conducted in accordance with federal procurement requirements. This policy explains the City Procurement Policy with respect to federally funded procurements by providing a cross-reference between federal procurement regulations, explains the applicable City procurement policy and how it conforms to federal requirements.
CFR Reference: 2CFR 200.318(a)
14.2 Procedures
City staff shall consult this policy when dealing with any procurements in which federal funds are contemplated or used. This document will be updated as needed to reflect changes in federal regulations. All procurements in which federal funds are contemplated or used must be conducted in accordance with federal procurement requirements. This policy explains the applicable City procurement policy and how it conforms to federal requirements. Note, certain grants will have additional procurement requirements, i.e. Buy America. In those instances, all procurement requirements identified in the circular shall also apply.
14.3 Policy
GENERAL PROCUREMENT STANDARDS
CFR Reference: 2CFR 200.318
14.3.1 Goal
All purchasing functions are to be conducted with the highest ethical standard. Department directors, division managers and employees must remain constantly aware of their responsibilities when spending public funds. The Finance Department will provide a purchasing process that implements and maintains the requirements of the City Municipal Code Chapter 3.0 and provide a centralized purchasing system to:
A. Establish a purchasing program providing for competitive bidding in the open market andobtaining the greatest possible advantage to the City.
B. Provide a cost-effective purchasing process utilizing high ethical standards.
C. Obtain the appropriate quality of materials and services at the lowest ultimate cost and in atimely manner
D. Provide a system to purchase, using effective fiscal controls that ensure adherence 85 15
Item 6.
to budget, expenditures, and encumbrances. Obtain appropriate levels of approval as established herein.
E. Award purchases to the lowest responsive and most responsible vendors meeting specificationsand city requirements.
F. Promote and maintain good relationship with vendors. City staff shall deal in a professional manner and promote equal opportunity, fairness and courtesy in all vendor relations.
14.3.2 Staff Responsibilities
It is the responsibility of all City of Beaumont staff assigned to purchase materials, equipment, supplies and services for all City functions to follow the established Procurement Process. These purchasing activities shall be conducted in the most economical and efficient manner.
14.3.3 Responsibilities of the Finance Department
Pursuant to the City Municipal Code the Finance Director is responsible for administration of purchasesfor all City departments. The City Municipal Code provides for the delegation of some or all the purchasing responsibilities to the department director and to his/her designee. With the promulgation of this provision, department directors are responsible for ensuring their department purchases are made in accordance with the Purchasing Guidelines and the approved Annual budget. The Finance Director is responsible for oversight ofthe various departments and to ensure adherence to the rules and regulations of the City Municipal Code Chapter 3. The Finance Director will assist department directors/designees to comply with the requirements of the purchasing guidelines.
The Department director may delegate the authority of procurement to staff member(s) within his/herdepartment and division. The designated staff carries the full responsibility for the purchasing processesdesignated to them.
14.3.4 Code of Ethics
A. Regard public service as a sacred trust, giving primary consideration to the interests of the City.
B. Purchase the best value obtainable, securing the maximum benefit for each tax 86 16
Item 6.
dollar expended.
C. Allow for full and open competition and not participate in uniform bidding.
D. Know and respect their obligations to the public, private sector and using agencies.
E. Accord vendor representatives' courteous treatment remembering that they are important sources of information and assistance in purchasing decisions.
F. Avoid all appearances of unethical or compromising acts during interaction with vendors.
G. Ensure that all vendors have the opportunity to participate in the bidding procedure.
H. Strive constantly for greater knowledge of purchasing methods and of the goods and services to be procured.
I. Conduct one -self with fairness and dignity, and demand honesty in buying and selling.
J. Remember that their conduct reflects on the City.
14.3.5 Conflict of Interest
No officer or employee of the City having any supervisory authority to purchase any specific goods, services or construction for the City shall engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. No employee, officer, or agent may participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by a Federal award if he or she has a real or apparent conflict of interest. Such a conflict of interest would arise when the employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family, his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or other interest in or a tangible personal benefit from a firm considered for a contract.
14.3.6 Gratuities
The Finance Director and all other officers and employees of the City are prohibited from accepting directly or indirectly from any person to whom any purchase order or contract is, or might be, awarded, any rebate, kickback, gift, money or other unlawful consideration. The offer of such gratuity to an official or employee by any supplier or contractor shall be cause for declaring such individual to be an irresponsible bidder and for preventing such supplier or contractor from bidding. The City may elect to audit any supplier or contractor documents as it pertains to this section. 87 17
Item 6.
14.3.7 Pre -Solicitation
A. The Finance Director and all other officers and employees of the City procuring with federal funds must avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items.
Consideration should be given to consolidating or breaking out procurements to obtain a more economical purchase. Where appropriate,an analysis will be made of lease versus purchase alternatives, and any other appropriate analysis to determine the most economical purchase.
CFR Reference: 2CFR 200.318(d)
B. Where advantageous for the City, when competitively bid and awarded and to foster greater economy and efficiency, and in accordance with efforts to promote cost-effective use of shared servicesacross the Federal Government, the City is encouraging staff to enter into state and local intergovernmental agreements or inter -entity agreements where appropriate for procurement or use of common or shared goods and services.
CFR Reference: 2CFR 200.318(e)
C. The City is encouraged to use value engineering clauses in contracts for construction projects of sufficient size to offer reasonable opportunities for cost reductions. Value engineering is a systematic and creative analysis of each contract item or task to ensure that its essential function is provided at the overall lower cost.
CFR Reference: 2CFR 200.318(g)
14.3.8 Post -Solicitation
A. The City must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources. See also §200.213 Suspension and debarment.
CFR Reference: 2CFR 200.318(h)
B. The City must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement.
These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.
88 18
Item 6.
CFR Reference: 2CFR 200.318(1)
C. The City may use a time and materials type contract only after a determination that no other contract is suitable and if the contract includes a ceiling price that the contractor exceeds at its own risk. Time and materials type contract means a contract whose cost to a non-federal entity is the sum of:
(i) The actual cost of materials; and
(ii) Direct labor hours charged at fixed hourly rates that reflect wages, general and administrative expenses, and profit.
In addition, since time -and -material type contract generates an open-ended contract price, a time -and -materials contract provides no positive profit incentive to the contractor for cost control or labor efficiency. Therefore, each contract must set a ceiling price that the contractor exceeds at its own risk. Further, City staff must assert a high degree of oversight in order to obtain reasonable assurance that the contractor is using efficient methods and effective cost controls
CFR Reference: 2CFR 200.318(j)
D. The City alone must be responsible, in accordance with good administrative practice and sound business judgment, for the settlement of all contractual and administrative issues arising out of procurements. These issues include, but are not limited to, source evaluation, protests, disputes, and claims. These standards do not relieve the City of any contractual responsibilities under its contracts. The federal awarding agency will not substitute its judgment for that of City staff unless the matter is primarily a federal concern. Violations of law will be referred to the local, state, or Federal authority having proper jurisdiction.
CFR Reference: 2CFR 200.318(k)
14.4 Competition
CFR Reference: 2CFR 200.319
14.4.1 All procurement transactions must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section. To ensure objective contractor performance and eliminate unfair competitive advantage, contractors that develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of work, or invitations for bids or requests 89 19
Item 6.
for proposals must be excluded from competing for such procurements. Some of the situations considered to be restrictive of competition include but are not limited to:
A. Placing unreasonable requirements on firms for them to qualify to do business.
B. Requiring unnecessary experience and excessive bonding.
C. Noncompetitive pricing practices between firms or between affiliated companies.
D. Noncompetitive contracts to consultants that are on retainer contracts.
E. Organizational conflicts of interest.
F. Specifying only a "brand name" product instead of allowing "an equal" product to be offered and describing the performance or other relevant requirements of the procurement; and
G. Any arbitrary action in the procurement process.
14.4.2 City staff must conduct procurements in a manner that prohibits the use of statutorily or administratively imposed state, local, or tribal geographical preferences in the evaluation of bids or proposals, except in those cases where applicable federal statutes expressly mandate or encourage geographic preference. Nothing in this section preempts state licensing laws. When contracting for architectural and engineering (A/E) services, geographic location may be a selection criterion provided its application leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the project,to compete for the contract.
14.4.3 City staff must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensurethat all solicitations:
A. Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Detailed product specifications should be avoided if possible. When it is impractical or uneconomical to make a clear and accurate 90 20
Item 6.
description of the technical requirements, a "brand name or equivalent" description may be used as a means to define the performance or other salient requirements of procurement. The specific features of the named brand which must be met by offers must be clearly stated; and
B. Identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and all other factors to be used inevaluating bids or proposals.
14.4.3 City Staff working on each grant must ensure that all prequalified lists of persons, firms, or products which are used in acquiring goods and services are current and include enough qualified sources to ensure maximum openand free competition. Also, staff must not preclude potential bidders from qualifying during the solicitation period.
14.5 Methods of Procurement to be Followed
CFR Reference: 2CFR 200.320
City staff must use one of the following methods of procurement.
A. Procurement by micro -purchases. Procurement by micro -purchase is the acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed $3,000 (as currently defined in CFR Reference: 2 CFD 200.67 or $2,000 in the case of acquisitions for construction subject to the Davis -Bacon Act).
Procurement by micro -purchase is the acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro -purchase threshold to the extent practicable, City staff must distribute micro -purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. Micro- purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if City staff considers the price to be reasonable.
B. Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $150,000 (as currently defined in CFR Reference: 2 CFD 200.88). If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.
91 21
Item 6.
C. Procurement by sealed bids (formal procurement). is the acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which exceed $150,000 Bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bid method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions in paragraph (c)(1) of this section apply.
1. In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present:
(a). A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available.
(b). Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and
(c). The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of thesuccessful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price.
2. If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply:
(a) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of known suppliers, providing themsufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised.
(b) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services for the bidder to properly respond.
(c) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and forlocal and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly.
(d) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; 92 22
Item 6.
and
(e) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason.
D. Procurement by competitive proposals (RFP)
The technique of competitive proposals is normally conducted with more than one source submitting an offer, and either a fixed price or cost -reimbursement type contract is awarded. It is generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. If this method is used, the following requirements apply:
1. Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered tothe maximum extent practical.
2. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources.
3. City staff must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and for selecting recipients.
4. Contracts must be awarded to the responsible firm whose proposal is most advantageous tothe program, with price and other factors considered; and
5. City staff may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications -based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby competitors' qualifications are evaluated, and the most qualified competitor is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of NE professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms are a potential source to perform the proposed effort.
E. [Reserved by Code of Federal Regulations]
F. Procurement by noncompetitive proposals (Sole/Single Source).
Procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when one or more of the following circumstances apply:
1. The item is available only from a single source.
2. The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from competitive solicitation.
93 23
Item 6.
3. The Federal awarding agency or pass -through entity expressly authorizes noncompetitive proposals in response to a written request from City staff; or
4. After solicitation of several sources, competition is determined inadequate.
14.6 Contracting with Small and Minority Businesses, Women's Business Enterprises, and Labor Surplus Area Firms
CFR Reference: 2CFR 200.321
A. City staff must take all necessary affirmative steps to assure that minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms are used when possible.
B. Affirmative steps must include:
1. Placing qualified small and minority businesses and women's business enterprises on solicitation lists.
2. Assuring that small and minority businesses, and women's business enterprises are solicited whenever they are potential sources.
3. Dividing total requirements, when economically feasible, into smaller tasks or quantities to permit maximum participation by small and minority businesses, and women's business enterprises.
4. Establishing delivery schedules, where the requirement permits, which encourage participation by small and minority businesses, and women's business enterprises.
5. Using the services and assistance, as appropriate, of such organizations as the Small BusinessAdministration and the Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce; and
6. Requiring the prime contractor, if subcontracts are to be let, to take the affirmative steps listed in paragraphs (1) through (5) of this section.
14.7 Procurement of Recovered Materials
CFR Reference: 2CFR 200.322
Contracts must contain a clause stating contractors must comply with section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
The requirements of Section 6002 include procuring only items designated in guidelines of 94 24
Item 6.
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 CFR part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable, consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired during the preceding fiscal year exceeded $10,000; procuring solid waste management services in a manner that maximizes energy and resource recovery; and establishing an affirmative procurement program for procurement of recovered materials identified in the EPA guidelines.
14.8 Contract Cost and Price
CFR Reference: 2CFR 200.323
14.8.1 City staff must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($150,000) including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the procurement situation, but as a starting point, City staff must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals.
14.8.2 City staff must negotiate profit as a separate element of the price for each contract in which there is no price competition and, in all cases, where cost analysis is performed.
To establish a fair and reasonable profit, consideration must be given to the complexity of the work to be performed, the risk borne by the contractor, the contractor's investment, the amount of subcontracting, the quality of its record of past performance, and industry profit rates in the surrounding geographical area for similar work.
14.8.3 Costs or prices based on estimated costs for contracts under the federal award are allowable only to the extent that costs incurred, or cost estimates included in negotiated prices would be allowable for City staff under Subpart E —Cost Principles of this part.
City staff may reference its own cost principles that comply with the federal cost principles.
14.8.4 The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used.
14.9 Federal Awarding Agency or Pass -Through Entity Review CFR Reference: 2CFR 200.324
95 25
Item 6.
14.9.1 City staff must make available, upon request of the federal awarding agency or pass - through entity, technical specifications on proposed procurements where the federal awarding agency or pass -through entity believes such review is needed to ensure that the item or service specified is the one being proposed for acquisition. This review generally will take place prior to the time the specification is incorporated into a solicitation document. However, if City staff desires to have the review accomplished after a solicitation has been developed, the federal awarding agency or pass -through entity may still review the specifications, with such review usually limited to the technical aspects of the proposed purchase.
14.9.2 City staff must make available upon request, for the federal awarding agency or pass - through entity pre -procurement review, procurement documents, such as requests for proposals or invitations for bids, or independent cost estimates, when:
A. City staff's procurement procedures or operation fails to comply with the procurement standards in this part;
B. The procurement is expected to exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold and is to be awarded without competition or only one bid or offer is received in response to a solicitation;
C. The procurement, which is expected to exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, specifies a "brand name" product;
D. The proposed contract is more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold and is to be awarded to other than the apparent low bidder under a sealed bid procurement; or
E. A proposed contract modification changes the scope of a contract or increases the contract amount by more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold.
14.9.3 City staff is exempt from the pre -procurement review in paragraph (b) of this section if the federal awarding agency or pass -through entity determines that its procurement systems comply with the standards of this part.
A. City staff may request that its procurement system be reviewed by the federal awarding agency or pass -through entity to determine whether its system meets these standards in order for its system to be certified. Generally, these reviews must occur where there is continuous high -dollar funding, and third -party 96 26
Item 6.
contracts are awarded on a regular basis;
B. City staff may self -certify its procurement system. Such self -certification must not limit the federal awarding agency's right to survey the system. Under a self - certification procedure, the federal awarding agency may rely on written assurances from City staff that it is complying with these standards. City staff must cite specific policies, procedures, regulations, or standards as being in compliance with these requirements and have its system available for review.
14.10 Bonding Requirements
CFR Reference: 2CFR 200.325
For construction or facility improvement contracts or subcontracts exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold ($150,000 as currently defined in CFR Reference: 2 CFD 200.88), the federal awarding agency or pass -through entity may accept the bonding policy and requirements of City staff provided that the federal awarding agency or pass -through entity has made a determination that the federal interest is adequately protected. If such a determination has not been made, the minimum requirements must be as follows:
A. A bid guarantee from each bidder equivalent to five percent of the bid price. The "bid guarantee" must consist of a firm commitment such as a bid bond, certified check, or other negotiable instrument accompanying a bid as assurance that the bidder will, upon acceptance ofthe bid, execute such contractual documents as may be required within the time specified.
(To be submitted with the bidding documents)
B. A performance bond on the part of the contractor for 100 percent of the contract price.
A "performance bond" is one executed in connection with a contract to secure fulfillment of all the contractor's obligations under such contract. (To be submitted at time of contract award)
C. A payment bond on the part of the contractor for 100 percent of the contract price. A "paymentbond" is one executed in connection with a contract to assure payment as required by law of all persons supplying labor and material in the execution of the work provided for in the contract.
(To be submitted at time of contract award)
14.11 Contract Provisions
97 27
Item 6.
CFR Reference: 2CFR 200.326
City staff's contracts must contain the applicable provisions described in Appendix II to Part 200 —Contract Provisions for non -Federal Entity Contracts under Federal Awards.
SECTION 15: CITY MANAGER EXEMPTION
The City Manager may exempt any grants from this policy at his/her sole discretion. 98 28
Item 6.
Appendix A
GRANT PROCESSING REQUEST FORM
Department of Administrative Services
DATE :
DEPARTMENT:
GRANT PROGRAM:
GRANTING ENTITY:
ENTITY CONTACT:
ENTITY PHONE NO:
IF FEDERAL GRANT... CFDA #
EXAMPLE OF NUMBER
Dept: Department of Education
(Entity No.) 84.XXX (Grant Program No.)
PROGRAM TITLE:
FUNDING REQUEST:
FEDERAL
STATE
LOCAL
MATCH
OTHER
TOTAL
REQUEST
IF LOCAL MATCH IS REQUIRED, ARE FUNDS AVAILABLE IN DEPARTMENT BUDGET? Y/N ACCOUNT TO WHICH THE MATCH WILL BECODED:
INDIRECT COSTS? Y/N
AMOUNT
REIMBURSEMENT GRANT? Y/N
FINANCIAL & PROGRESS REPORTS
PREPARED BY:
Department Finance
REQUEST FOR FUNDS SUBMITTED BY:
Department Finance
PROJECT
DIRECTOR:
PHONE:
EMAIL:
DEPT. DIRECTOR OR THEIR
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
DESIGNEE APPROVING
SUBMISSON:
REVIEWED & APPROVED BY
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
FINANCE:
REVIEWED & APPROVED BY
CITY ADMINISTRATION:
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
29 99
Appendix B
TECHNOLOGY SERVICE REQUEST FORM
Department of Administrative Services
Item 6.
DATE :
DEPARTMENT:
GRANT
PROGRAM:
PROGRAM
TITLE:
AMOUNT OF GRANT ($):
ONGOING IT COSTS? Y/N ($) /YR
WILL PROFESSIONAL IT SERVICES BE NEEDED FOR INSTALLATION OR MAINTENANCE? Yes / No ? If Yes, please describe.
ARE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OR MAINTENANCE COVERED BY GRANT? Yes / No ? If Yes, please describe.
LIST ALL EQUIPMENT AND/OR SOFTWARE TO BE ACQUIRED THROUGH THE GRANT? (Include Lifecycle for each item listed. See attachment A) Item
Lifecycle
PROJECT
MANAGER:
PHONE:
EMAIL:
REVIEWED & APPROVED BY
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY:
REVIEWED & APPROVED BY
CITY ADMINISTRATION:
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
30 100
ATTACHMENT A
Item 6.
Device
Personal Computers
Cell Phones
Tablets and (pads
Copiers/Printers
Servers
Networking Infrastructure
AV Equipment
Replacement Period
4-5 years depending upon function and Warranty
2-3 years
3-5 years
5-7 years
5 years
5-7 years
5-7 Years
Peripherals
As needed
31 101
Purpose
1. To ensure proper oversight of all funds awarded to the City.
2. To minimize the City's risk of losing funding due to non-compliance with grant requirements.
s. To ensure proper administration and accounting of all grants.
Scope
1. Applies to any Beaumont program, department or fund division.
2. Preparation and submittal of grant applications for funds, materials and/or equipment.
Item 6.
BEAUMONT
_�A� FOR��A
3. Goals and objectives of City departments should be established early through a planning process and should not change based on new grant availability.
4. If grant policies and regulations conflict with the City policies, state or federal regulations shall prevail, unless they are less restrictive, wherein the City policy shall prevail.
104
Policies and
Procedures
1. Central Responsibility
2. Grant Application Procedures
3. Grant Acceptance Procedures
4. Master File and Fiscal File
5. Monitoring and Reporting
6. Indirect Costs
7. Personnel
8. Grant Related Procurement
9. Classification of Grant Revenue
10. Year -End Procedures
11. Grant Closeout
Central
Responsibility
Item 6.
BEAUMONT
• Administrative Services Department will serve as the department responsible for all grants.
• Maintain backup file to facilitate management, monitoring, and reporting assistance.
A central grant file shall be maintained by the department seeking grant funds.
• Finance Department will assist in minimizing City's risk for non-compliance. • Finance Department will aid individual departments on federal grants to ensure compliance with the Federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 106
Application
Procedures
• Applications to be completed by each department seeking funds, materials, equipment, etc.
Item 6.
BEAUMONT
_�A� FOR��A
• Complete financial assessment.
Initial and on -going costs
• Staff support, computer systems, office space and furniture, utility needs, equipment and supplies, indirect costs, etc.
• Grant Processing Request Form
• Technology Service Request Form
107
Appendix A
GRANT PROCESSING REQUEST FORM
Department of Administrative Services
DATE:
DEPARTMENT:
GRANT PROGRAM:
GRANTING ENTITY:
ENTITY CONTACT:
ENTITY PHONE NO:
IF FEDERAL GRANT... CFDA #
EXAMPLE OF NUMBER
Dept: Department of Education
jEntity No.) 84.XXX (Grant Program No.)
PROGRAM TITLE:
FUNDING REQUEST:
FEDERAL
STATE
LOCAL
MATCH
OTHER
TOTAL
REQUEST
IF LOCAL MATCH IS REQUIRED, ARE FUNDS AVAILABLE IN DEPARTMENT BUDGET? YJN ACCOUNT TO WHICH THE MATCH WILL BECODED:
INDIRECT COSTS? YIN
AMOUNT
REIMBURSEMENT GRANT? YIN
FINANCIAL & PROGRESS REPORTS
PREPARED BY:
Department Finance
REQUEST FOR FUNDS SUBMITTED BY:
Department Finance
PROJECT
DIRECTOR:
PHONE:
EMAIL:
DEPT. DIRECTOR OR THEIR
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
DESIGNEE APPROVING
SUBMISSON:
REVIEWED & APPROVED BY
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
FINANCE:
REVIEWED & APPROVED BY
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
CITY ADMINISTRATION:
29 Item 6.
BEAUMONT
-CALIFORNIA-
108
Appendix B
TECHNOLOGY SERVICE REQUEST FORM
Department of Administrative Services
DATE:
DEPARTMENT:
GRANT
PROGRAM:
PROGRAM
TITLE:
AMOUIJT OF GRANT 1$):
ONGOING IT COSTS? YIN (S) IYR
WILL PROFESSIONAL IT SERVICES BE NEEDED FOR INSTALLATION OR MAINTENANCE? Yes ; Ho ? If Yes, please describe.
ARE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OR MAINTENANCE COVERED BY GRANT? Yes I No ? If Yes, please describe.
LIST ALL EQUIPMENT AIJD.+OR SOFTWARE TO BE ACQUIRED THROUGH THE GRANT? {Include Lifecycle for each item listed. See attachment A} Item
Lifecycle
PROJECT
MANAGER:
PHONE:
EMAIL:
REVIEWED & APPROVED BY
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY:
REVIEWED & APPROVED BY
SIGNATURE:
DATE:
CITY ADMINISTRATION:
30 Item 6.
BEAUMONT
-CALIFORNIA-
109
Application
Procedures
• All grant acceptances to be approved by City Council.
Item 6.
BEAUMONT
_�A� FOR��A
• If a grant application is denied, a copy of the denial will be placed in the master file and a summary shall be drafted. The copy of the denial and summary shall be forwarded to the Administrative Services Department to be included in the fiscal file.
110
Acceptance
Procedures
• Grant award letter / acceptance agreement provided to Admin Services Dept.
Grant amount
Assurances
Special conditions
Guidelines and deadlines
• Finance Department will establish a budget appropriation • Account code
• Reimbursable grant procedures
• Notification to Admin Services and Finance if:
Subsequent alteration in funding
Subsequent alteration in City's obligation
Grants to be carried into next fiscal year
Notification the grant will be terminated
Master File &
Fiscal File
• Master file to be kept by Department Program Manager
• Fiscal file to be kept by Administrative Services Department Item 6.
BEAUMONT
• Grant files must be retained in accordance with the City of Beaumont's file retention policy or, for federal awards, the retention requirements for records per 2 CFR 200-333 whichever is more restrictive.
112
Monitoring &
Reporting
Item 6.
BEAUMONT
• Departments are responsible for continuous monitoring of grants that have been awarded
• Finance Department will provide departments monthly financial reports Funds expended
Remaining funding
Budget to actual analysis
Payments received
Grant receivable or advance payments
Matching funds
• Departments shall notify Admin Services and Finance promptly on all discrepancies
113
Monitoring &
Reporting
• Line -item budget amendments must be approved prior to grant expenditures being made
• Must be done in accordance with the awarding agencies policies and procedures
Item 6.
BEAUMONT
_�A� FOR��A
• Departments must monitor grants for compliance with all applicable federal, state and local regulations
• Example: Equipment purchased with grant funds must be disposed of in accordance with the terms of the grant
• Departments shall require sub -recipients of grant funds to submit progress reports 114
Monitoring &
Reporting
• Grant reporting shall be performed by the Department applying for the grant, unless otherwise stated in the Grant request form
• Departments shall be responsible for complying with all due dates and requirements specified in each grant
Item 6.
BEAUMONT
• Reimbursement requests shall be timely to maximize the financial benefits of the grants to the City
115
Indirect Costs
Item 6.
BEAUMONT
_�A� FOR��A
• Some grants allow various indirect costs to be funded through the grant program • Departments should work with the Finance Department to identify and calculate indirect costs for inclusion into a grant application
• Some examples: staff time and external auditor expenses 116
Personnel
• A staffing plan shall be submitted to Admin Services for new positions to be funded by a grant
Duration (temporary / permanent)
Work details
How will the position be funded upon expiration of the grant Item 6.
BEAUMONT
_�A� FOR��A
• Any new personnel positions to be created with grant funding must be approved by the City Manager and City Council
• Departments must notify Human Resources / Payroll prior to the start of each fiscal year if coding changes for those persons being charged to grants 117
Procurement
Item 6.
BEAUMONT
_�A� FOR��A
• Purchase requisitions using grant funds shall clearly indicate the pertinent account code for the grant
• The department head or program manager must also communicate the applicable procurement standards for the grant to the Finance Department along with the purchase requisition
• Special attention is required for federal grants which have detailed and lengthy procurement policies
• In some cases, Beaumont's procurement standards may be more restrictive, and thus must also be followed by the program manager
118
Classification of
Grant Revenues
• All federal, state, and local grant revenue shall be receipted as revenue as opposed to as expenditure refunds to remain in compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principals (GAAP) revenue recognitions requirements
Year -End
Procedures
Item 6.
BEAUMONT
_�A� FOR��A
• June and July Invoices shall clearly indicate which fiscal year (prior or current) they are to be posted
• Only goods and services received prior to July 1 can be posted back to the prior year
• Program managers shall ensure all funds are expended or encumbered prior to the end of the grant period
120
Grant Closeout
Item 6.
BEAUMONT
_�A� FOR��A
• A grant is completed when all work funded by the grant is complete or the grant period of performance ends
• If work cannot be completed in the specified period, the program manager is responsible for requesting a continuation or no -cost extension • Adherence to each grant's specific closeout requirements • Final reports and final payment requests
• To ensure accuracy, the program manager must obtain a final grant recap report from the Finance Department prior to completing a final report and final payment request
• Final reports and final payment requests shall be signed by the appropriate department head prior to submittal
121
Item 7.
BEAUMONTA -C A L I F O R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Sean Thuilliez, Chief of Police
DATE January 4, 2022
SUBJECT: Discussion of Beaumont Police Department Response to Calls for Illegal Fireworks and Provide Direction to City Staff
Background and Analysis:
This item is being presented at City Council's request after receiving complaints related to illegal fireworks activity following Independence Day 2021. The use of illegal fireworks on and around the Independence Day holiday generates a high volume of calls to the Beaumont Police Department.
On July 4, 2021, 138 calls were received reporting the use of illegal fireworks and of these calls, officers issued six citations and confiscated a large quantity of fireworks.
The Police Department also responded to an additional 243 calls for service within the same timeframe. The dispatch center handled 371 calls for service compared to a normal daily average of 240 calls. To handle the increased call load, the department staffs an additional communication officer, a police lieutenant, sergeant, and five additional officers.
In addition to fireworks enforcement, the Police Department also staffs the Fourth of July Freedom Festival at Stewart Park. This event results in a considerable dedication of police officers and volunteers to provide site security and traffic control. The cost of police services for the festival in 2019 was more than $10,000.
The most significant challenge to enforcing illegal fireworks is the ability to quickly identify and respond to the location of illegal fireworks activity. City staff has three recommendations that may assist in the detection and enforcement of Chapter 9.41 Fireworks in the Beaumont Municipal Code.
Recommendation 1: Implementation of the City's mobile app with a firework reporting tab that will enable members of the community to file real-time reports alerting officers of the specific location of individuals setting off fireworks. 122
Item 7.
Recommendation 2: The formation of a fireworks taskforce that will deploy fire marshal personnel, code enforcement officers, and police officers into neighborhoods in the nights leading up to July 4.
Recommendation 3: The Police Department utilizing its unmanned aerial vehicle to focus on areas of frequent calls for service for fireworks to identify locations and persons of use.
Fiscal Impact:
City staff estimates the cost to prepare this staff report to be $975.
Recommended Action:
Discuss and provide direction to City staff.
123
Item 8.
BEAUMONTA —c A L I F O R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Todd Parton, City Manager
DATE January 4, 2022
SUBJECT: Direct the Beaumont Economic Development Committee to Assist Downtown Business and Landowners to Promote Business Growth and Development in the Central Business District
Background and Analysis:
The Elevate Beaumont 2040 General Plan adopted on December 1, 2020, included a specific plan (SP) for downtown Beaumont. This plan included new land use designations, new and revised zoning districts, improved development standards and new street sections.
The SP recognizes the historic central business district (CBD) area as the heart of the City providing a diverse economic, residential and cultural opportunities. Pursuant to the SP this vision will be achieved by creating a core area with locally oriented businesses and service establishments as well as recreational and cultural amenities. It is imperative that the built environment creates a sense of place built upon pedestrian oriented design concepts.
A critical element to the success of the SP's vision is active participation of the downtown business community and land owners. Many cities have successfully engaged their local stakeholders to establish downtown specific organizations that market their CBDs and encourage business growth and expansion. The City of Lodi is one such example and information on their program is included in Attachment A to this report.
As with Lodi and other communities who have created successful downtown programs, Beaumont would be best served by engaging its key stakeholders to enhance its efforts to revitalize the CBD. The City is already investing substantial dollars on core projects and economic development services to create the preferred environment and provide support to the downtown business community.
124
Item 8.
The Beaumont Economic Development Committee may provide a resource to initiate meetings of the key stakeholders. The objective of these meetings would be to facilitate the formation of a formal organization for the CBD such as a Downtown Business Association. This association would be separate and apart form the City and would be managed by the stakeholders.
It is proposed that the City Council provide direction to the Economic Development Committee to do the following:
1. Identify key stakeholders for the CBD area that is defined in the General Plan;
2. Reach out to said stakeholders and organize a kickoff meeting intended to orient the attendees on the City's downtown vision, to inform them of the capital improvements programed for the downtown area and the economic development resources offered by the City, and to identify common issues and concerns for the stakeholders; and
3. To help facilitate and support an on -going effort to be driven by the stakeholders.
Fiscal Impact:
City staff estimates the cost to prepare this report to be $2,340.
Recommended Action:
Direct the Beaumont Economic Development Committee to assist downtown business and landowners to promote business growth and development in the central business district.
Attachments:
A. City of Lodi Business Association
B. Presentation
125
12/30/21, 11:36 AM Downtown Business Alliance of Lodi — Lodi Business Directory Item 8.
F LO "Insuring the future rokh
of Historic Downtown Lodi„
Downtown Business Alliance
MENI,
[email protected]
WE LOVE OUR MEMBERS
https://dbalodi.com
126
1/8
12/30/21, 11:36 AM Downtown Business Alliance of Lodi — Lodi Business Directory Downtown Lodi is the hub of the local community with many businesses offering great services for the city and residents. Lodi is a diverse playground built on the foundation that all our members uphold and that is to always be a welcoming, something for everyone type of place.
bncun 1 ncri uu 1
RESTAURANTS
Hungry? Thirsty? Both? We get it. There is something quite amazing about the dining and drinks out in Lodi. Maybe its the closeness to the vineyards ...
READ MORE
Item 8.
https://dbalodi.com
127
2/8
12/30/21, 11:36 AM Downtown Business Alliance of Lodi — Lodi Business Directory SHOP
Looking for that special item or gift for that special someone? Just in the mood to do some souvenir shopping? Or are you looking for something ...
READ MORE
LODI, CA
-e52°F
PARTLY CLOUDY
FRI A 50°F
SAT * 49°F
SUN 53°F
Powered by Dark Sky
4 mph
a 6 mph
4 mph
Q 4 mph
SIGN UP FOR OUR FREE E -NEWSLETTER
Item 8.
https://dbalodi.com
128
3/8
12/30/21, 11:36 AM Downtown Business Alliance of Lodi — Lodi Business Directory Item 8.
YOUR EMAIL:
SUBMf i
LATEST NEWS &
MARK YOUR CALENDAR
FOR OUR MEMBER MIXER
ON AUGUST 2ND!
Mark your calendar for Monday, August
2nd from 6-7:30 pm
at @jeremywineco for our first DBA
Member Mixer in over a year!...
129
https://dbalodi.com
4/8
12/30/21, 11:36 AM Downtown Business Alliance of Lodi — Lodi Business Directory SUPPORT LOCAL BUSINESS WITH THE RAD CARD!
READ MORE
NI
DBA
MEMBER
MIXER
Mi 11 &Y
Item 8.
130
https://dbalodi.com
5/8
12/30/21, 11:36 AM Downtown Business Alliance of Lodi — Lodi Business Directory � AUU
2ND, 2021
Jeremy Wine Co
6W Pine St
6:00 PM- 7:30 PM
-T 7,
20L
JOIN US IN -PERSON ON AUGUST 2ND FOR A DBA MEMBER MIXER.
READ MORE
THINGS TO
30 •—
s 1 l
l*- �
s,
1 1
.
111
r',
•
• re A
wr
4. Item 8.
https://dbalodi.com
131
6/8
12/30/21, 11:36 AM Downtown Business Alliance of Lodi — Lodi Business Directory pow
Mr-
—.r
r,
fl GRRN VINO Di lOS VINOS ;CALIFORNIA"
FI. MATADOR
, --
dOIADOR VS
Item 8.
https://dbalodi.com
132
7/8
12/30/21, 11:36 AM Downtown Business Alliance of Lodi — Lodi Business Directory Item 8.
Downtown Lodi is the premier hot spot because many of the stores and restaurants are run by local business owners. When you walk into their stores and cafes you will feel welcome and comfortable. You can find generations of families hard at work who are always willing to greet you with a smile. The friendly and helpful locals are one of unique charms about downtown Lodi, and the dominance of local businesses in the downtown area make it truly special.
WHAT WE DO
Members
About Us
Sign Up For Membership
WHO WE ARE
Our Story
Board of Directors
History of Lodi
CONTACT INFO
(209) 747-1100
B [email protected]
Designed & Maintained by: Taffer Computers.
133
https://dbalodi.com
8/8
ity Council
January 4,7.022
134
1 DI 11. IQ aaop UARLO1UMOO
46. ' JR 4' M
1II11E !11111! J1111U
=IIII :illll-.IIIIIIII
1111! FA 1111101111111
kill.; .;1111i.11111111
:111' !l 11111 111111 Holm 1111111.1J111IJ1,=11111111'111- EZ 11111111I111 1 1 =■ 1 ;111111 ■I� 1111RI: 1!111111:11111111 1161111 11�111111111111� t 6EAUMONS. E a5 9EAU ,VT
UM: ■■■ 111J!■ 1111 1111x1111 111111■q.1I11111« t i 11 1 IIiI -- 'EIIIIII. 1 11111 =MI 111111_ 1111111 ■1111w11�r�i r1ipi11 :iIII!11111
I 1111!— IJ�i
ill
■1111111111111:
911111M111111
:u11111I111'I
M■• 1_791Tr r'-
11?
' Lt.,_1:.4." A
��•
it 'a .•
14-
M A17 .- N IL
W.sui -k isE rt A'.t
'Ft Fl itn1.10.4A2011.
w
01 v1'
in on II
11 M III
Z
Downtown
Vision
■ Focused interventions in area along Sixth
Street and Beaumont Avenue
■ Defining the City's center:
- Civic anchor
- Walkable, active, and pedestrian -
oriented
- Retail and en tertainmen t
- Mixed residential uses
Item 8.
Do vntown Beaumont will be the heart of the City, providing an exciting diversigy of economic, residential, and cultural oppfyrtmities. It will be a vibrant and dynamic place to work, live, shop, and gather for special events. it will also be a pedestrian friend y environment with comft rtable sidewalks and an inviting streetscape. The Do town Area Plan aril create a balanced and integrated mix of residential, office, retail and civic land uses that generate daily activity in the daytime and evenings and create a lively and dynamic environinent. This Plan encourages opportunities for public gathering spaces and parks for civic and cultural events that an supported by a street network which meets the nenri of pedestrians, bicyclists, and motor vehicles.
711 1
Item 8.
Crdiu Boal
UERr GR1
I Downtown Mixed
Use
ALLOWED USES:
• Mixed -use development,
including retail, offices, and
housing
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
• Density: 15 Units per acre
• Maximum Building Height: 3
stories (45 feet)
OKI 'CO
r -
P L,
Beaumont Avenue Mixed
1 lc,
ALLOWED USES: Professional office,
service, and limited commercial activities
along with residential uses
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
Density: 10 Units per acre
Maximum Building Height: 2 stories, 35 feet
Item 8.
138
Sixth Stree+ Mixed Use
ALLOWED USES: Commercial and
multifamily housing
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
Density: 22 Units per acre
Maximum Building Height: 4 stories, 60 feet
Item 8.
139
Sixth Street Mixed Use DOS iden jal
ALLOWED USES: Commercial, retail, multi-
family housing, live -work units
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
Density: 22 Units per acre
Maximum Building Height: 4 stories, 60 feet
Downtown Mixed
esidentiaI
ALLOWED USES: Single and multi-
family residential
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
Density: 12 Units per acre
Maximum building height: 2 stories or
35 feet (whichever is less)
Item 8.
Sixth
Street
12'
Sharraw
I3'
Sidewalk
30'
Angled Parking
S0'
Right-of-way
1 12' 13'
Sharraw Sidewalk
Beaumont Avenue to Palm Avenue
13'
Sid ra,elt
5' 12' 10'
7' pike i Travel L1 ne
Lane
10 Tra el Lane Travel Lane
SQr
Fight -a -way
10'
travel Lane
2'I 5'
7 Bike
Lane
13'
Sidewalk
Palm Avenue to Pennsylvania Avenue
Item 8.
142
ill
d. r 1F
116
1)alm ,.
w
M ._
•
F _.
#, %r�
•r
1R •
J. ., •• .
•
•
•
Sixth Street (Beaumont Avenue to Palm Ave)
•'•' 1 b
T � J
1 1 _�;_�
1 1. "A jail
p
_ - P i" •7. -: :. 1
1 a R■
143
Beaumont
Avenue
17'
Skdev ilk
S' I a'
1' Bike Lane
1D'
Travel Lane
10' 1 3' 1 S' 17'
Travel Lane S' Bike Lan Sidewalk
Item 81
11' I r I 11'
Travel Lane M ian j ed Trawl Lane
1v4'
Riehhofnvay
Fifth Street to Sixth Street
SJI111103
Sidewalk I1 Bike Land Travel Lane I Travel Lane I Travel Lyre I travel Lane 7a3Bike Lane 106'
Right-pl.-way
213'
Sldewafk
Sixth Street to Eighth Street
1 3' I 5' 1 3' 1 11'
11' erla L1 .n I Troves Lane
zz' 13' r S' I a' B'
Travel Lane 11' P#r Blle Rene king
Lane
Sidewalk
Parking
Lane
100'
Right-of-way
x0'
Sidewalk
1441
Eighth Street to Twelfth Street
VE4/CLE 55
-Ares FOR
FARMERS MARKET
/ EvENrs
S0LL • W.5
— PLAZA w/
SKAOE TREES
M •9E 51RUCr4RE
w/ PORTABLE
rA8LE5 ANv
crFAIRS
RA/SEP
k it
Mir
uadds allidai■ nee i ■■■■■■•Uui L
■ ■■n■t •■mu■■■■■■ecaa■■■■■■e,
■ ■■mOWE■■.1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■'b■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■,
IN■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r
■■■■■f
A0d■■7� ENNIII `C`aau • a
■■■■T•MIE ■CWZMaaa■■■■
lICEMu7 ■■■1■►
. � v %r..�/.♦�.�I I.`2,
En Al. mili
A NM iim liAlo 4 MI6 MN
am am
Emirs ■I 111 ■kAw'rt.:. %;,174,41
►/, m ma
I► ■.
■milkmai ma_ r�'��'�•"�'.��� ��� ■■ ::t*
I(
•
111111
111
Erns
.../
■■I,1■ ►� � �—+ .Alaili. MAN
Prillike.4* -4.. AleNstrrl w ."10111.1.11111.1111
ILL tarnil 1111111110"F ‘
filliiiiii
g/s1_ _,c CNERRy TREE
G -ROVE W/r/{
,Nr8-PREr7VE NA -E
Ps -compass -P.
G-RAN,1 E
High Priority Actions
(01-lealth &
environmental
justice
Infrastructure
& community
facilities
Conservation
• Permit Processing. Maintaining and
enhancing efficient building permit
processes.
• Online Site Inventory. Create and maintain an
online inventory of shovel -ready sites and
provide individualized site selection assistance
to g exp andin and new businesses.
• Retail Recruitment Strategy. Create and
implement a retail recruitment strategy that
utilizes direct communications with targeted
retailers to reverse sales tax leakage in key
sectors, such as dining, entertainment, and
specialty retail.
Item 8.
Strategy
Mobility
Community
design &
landuse
ECONOMIC
1 DEVELOPMENT
Health &
environmental
' justice
Infrastructure
& community
facilities
Conservation
• Retail Recruitment Strategy.
• Identify Barriers of Entry
• Fiscal
• Environmental
• Logistical
• Propose Solutions and/or Incentives to
Reduce Barriers of Entry
Item 8.
149
Getting to Work
Health &
environmental
justice
Infrastructure
& community
facilities
Safety
Conservation•
• Economic Development Committee
• Establish Downtown Business
Association
• Meet Regularly with Downtown
Businesses
• Catalog Barriers of Entry
• Determine How to Overcome Barriers
Item 8.
150
Item 9.
BEAUMONTA -C A L 1 F O R N 1
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Todd Parton, City Manager
DATE January 4, 2022
SUBJECT: Discussion and Direction to City Staff on Comments to the Draft Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Report Prepared for the IH- 10/Cherry Valley Interchange Project
Background and Analysis:
On December 23, 2021, Beaumont City staff received public notice from Caltrans regarding a public hearing to be held on January 13, 2022, from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. regarding the Draft Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Report (Draft IS/EA) for the IH-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange upgrade and reconfiguration project. The notice specifies the intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). A copy of the public notice is included in Attachment A to this report.
Included in Attachment B to this report is a project overview published on the Riverside County Transportation Commission website. This summary provides a brief history, project status, and project schedule.
The City of Calimesa, Riverside County and Caltrans have been studying options for the upgrade and reconfiguration of the IH-10/Cherry Valley Interchange project. Planned improvements would incorporate an expanded bridge, expanded roadway approaches on Calimesa and Cherry Valley Boulevard, and pedestrian amenities. The Draft IS/EA concludes that, "... the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment for the reasons discussed below." After this sentence, the report states that the project would have less than significant impacts to the following: mineral resources, land use and planning, recreation, aesthetics, agriculture and forest resources, air quality, cultural resources, energy, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, noise, population and housing, public services, transportation, tribal cultural resources, utilities and service systems, and wildfire. It further states that, "With mitigation measures incorporated, the project would have less than significant effect to Biological Resources, Geology and Soils (paleontological resources), and Greenhouse 151
Item 9.
Gas Emissions...." Based on these findings a MND was deemed to be appropriate. A copy of the Draft IS/EA is included as Attachment B to this report.
Three alternatives are under consideration — "Alternative 1 — No Build," "Alternative 3 — Diverging Diamond Interchange," and "Alternative 4 — Partial Cloverleaf Interchange." These design alternatives are consistent with information presented to the City Council by Riverside County in early 2021. Attachments C and D provide graphics depicting Alternative 3 and Alternative 4.
The January 13, 2022, public hearing will be held in a virtual format. Written comments on the Draft IS/EA MND or on the project may be submitted by January 24, 2022, to Caltrans.
Fiscal Impact:
City staff estimates it cost approximately $585 to prepare this report.
Recommended Action:
City Council discuss the Draft Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Report and provide direction to City staff on any comments that should be forwarded to Caltrans;
City Council discuss the proposed alternative alignments and provide direction to City staff on any comments that should be forwarded to Caltrans; and Authorize Mayor Lloyd White to execute a letter conveying City Council comments to Caltrans no later than January 24, 2022.
Attachments:
A. Public Notice — IH-10/Cherry Valley Interchange Project B. RCTC Summary of IH-10/Cherry Valley Interchange Project C. IH-10/Cherry Valley Interchange — Draft Initial Study/Environmental Assessment Report, December 2021
D. IH-10/Cherry Valley Interchange — Alternative 3
E. IH-10/Cherry Valley Interchange — Alternative 4
152
•
PUBLIC NOTICE „.i' Item 9.
r TAN
Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration .- _ Announcement of a Public Hearing for l�- v
Interstate 10 / Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project -ir'j*3y Study Results Available
• y,r.w KtyvA, M�� R
Y �y�. `\ (HEHH"(VALLEY BLVD
IL
- ��
- - - -- .- ..��- qq i::
',.y I�� Illil1+iii i i l l
,
-
WHAT'S
BEING
PLANNED?
The City of Calimesa (City), in cooperation with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the County of Riverside (County), proposes to upgrade and reconfigure the existing Interstate 10 (I-10)/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange. The project is located on I-10, between the Singleton Road and Oak Valley Parkway interchanges. Three alternatives are being evaluated: Alternative 1 (No Build), Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond Interchange), Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf Interchange). Key components of the project would include the widening of Cherry Valley Boulevard (including the I-10 overcrossing), realignment and reconstruction of on- and off -ramps, auxiliary lanes along I-10 in both the eastbound and westbound directions, and provisions for sidewalks and bicycle facilities along Cherry Valley Boulevard.
WHY THIS
AD?
The team (City, County, and Caltrans) has studied the effects this project may have on the environment. Our studies show it will not significantly affect the quality of the environment. The Draft Initial Study/Environmental Assessment (Draft IS/EA) report outlines why the project will not significantly affect the quality of the environment. This notice is to tell you of the preparation of the Draft IS/EA and of its availability for you to read. A public hearing will be held to give you an opportunity to comment on certain design features of the project with Caltrans, City and County staff before the report is finalized and a final design is selected.
WHAT'S
AVAILABLE?
The Draft IS/EA and other project information is available for review at:
• City of Calimesa, City Hall, 908 Park Avenue, Calimesa, California 92320 • Calimesa Library, 974 Calimesa Boulevard, Calimesa, California 92320 • Caltrans District 8, 464 West 4th Street, San Bernardino, California 92401 An electronic copy (PDF format) of the Draft IS/EA can be viewed at:
• Coun . of Riverside website: hi • s://rc ,ro ects.or,,/
WHERE YOU
COME IN
Do you have any comments about the project with an Initial Study with [Proposed] Mitigated Negative Declaration/Environmental Assessment (IS/EA)? Would you care to make any other comments on the project? Please submit your comments in writing no later than January 24, 2022 to:
California Department of Transportation
ATTN: Shawn Oriaz, Senior Environmental Planner
464 West 4s' Street, 66 Floor, MS -827
San Bernardino, CA 92401
or via e-mail to: [email protected]. Please include "Interstate 10 Cherry Valley Boulevard" in the subject line. We will be, in acce )tint= comments on December 23, 2021.
WHEN &
WHERE?
A virtual public hearing (open forum format with court reporter) will be held on January 13.2022 from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. The meeting will be conducted via Zoom at hitps://us06web.zoom.us/j/85829724839. • Call -in information:
o iPhone one -tap: +13462487799„85829724839# or +17207072699„85829724839# o Telephone: 346 248 7799 or 720 707 2699
o Webinar ID: 858 2972 4839
CONTACT &
SPECIAL
REQUESTS
For more information about this study or this project, please contact the Caltrans District 8 Office of Public Affairs at (909) 383-4631. For those with sensory disabilities requiring alternate formats (i.e. Braille, large print, sign language interpreter, etc.) and those needing information in a language other than English, please contact Terry Kasinga, Chief, Public and Media Affairs at 909-383-4646 or TTY 711. '^
Project F2'+ ckoo+
Winter
Item 9.
Interstate 10 / Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project PROJECT LOCATION:
ESTIMATED INVEST' 'L L1
$50,000,000 to $60,000,000
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Preliminary Planning Phase
(Completed Summer 2018)
Project Approval and
Environmental Document
(Approval Anticipated Spring 2022)
Final Design Completed
(Anticipated Summer 2024')
Nfr
Construction Start
(Anticipated Fall 2024')
Subject to the availability of funds,
dates are estimated.
Cherry Valley Boulevard, on 1-10
between the Singleton Road and
Oak Valley Parkway interchanges
PROI OT O 'L 1 rLLWr
The City of Calimesa (City), in cooperation with the California Department ofTransportation (Caltrans) and the County of Riverside (County), proposes to reconstruct the Interstate 10 (I-10)/Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange to relieve congestion and improve traffic operations. The project is currently evaluating three alternatives:
• Alternative 1 - No Build Alternative
• Alternative 3 - Diverging Diamond Interchange
• Alternative 4 - Partial Cloverleaf Interchange
Alternative 3 was identified as the Locally Preferred Alternative at a City of Calimesa City Council meeting on September 8, 2020. The proposed project will include the following key components:
• Widen Cherry Valley Boulevard to two lanes in each direction • Add turn pockets along Cherry Valley Boulevard approaching on -ramps • Add pedestrian crosswalks and curb ramps
• Reconstruct and realign on- and off -ramps
• Realign Calimesa Boulevard north of the l-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange • Provide channelized turning on Cherry Valley Boulevard to Calimesa Boulevard • Install new traffic signals
• Construct sidewalks and bicycle lanes along Cherry Valley Boulevard • Add a 1,300 -foot long auxiliary lane to the eastbound off -ramp and 3,400 -foot long auxiliary lane to the westbound on -ramp
Stay Involved
Public participation plays an important role in the environmental approval process. To be added to the project contact list and be updated on future project events, please email [email protected]. 154
Item 9.
u (951)
955-6800
(/CONTACT)
(/)
home (/)
projects
news
(/news)
contact
(/contact)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
1-10 Cherry Valley
Interchange
Project Overview
The City of Calimesa (City), in cooperation with the
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and
the County of Riverside (County), proposes to upgrade
and reconfigure the existing Interstate 10 (I-10)/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange. The project is located on 1-10, between the Singleton Road and Oak Valley
Parkway interchanges. Three alternatives are being
evaluated: Alternative 1 (No Build), Alternative 3
(Diverging Diamond Interchange), Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf Interchange). Key components of the project
would include the widening of Cherry Valley Boulevard
(including the 1-10 overcrossing), realignment and
u PROJECT CONTACT
John Ashlock
(951) 955-1511
[email protected]
PROJECT SCHEDULE
• Environmental Clearance Phase Completion: Spring
2022
• Design Phase Completion: Summer 2024
155
reconstruction of on- and off -ramps, addition of
auxiliary lanes along 1-10 in both the eastbound and
westbound directions, and provisions for sidewalks and
bicycle facilities along Cherry Valley Boulevard within the project limits.
Two interchange design alternatives are being
considered for the project:
• Alternative 3: (/s/Build-Alternative-3-Diverging-
Diamond.png) A diverging diamond interchange that
crosses each direction of traffic to the opposite side of the overpass. This alternative provides two through lanes in each direction, optimizes left -turn movements and
reduces vehicle conflict points.
• Alternative 4: (/s/Build-Alternative-4-Partial-
Cloverleaf.png) A partial cloverleaf configuration that would accommodate two through lanes in each
direction along Cherry Valley Boulevard and realigns
the on- and off -ramps while adding a loop on -ramp in
the westbound direction.
• Right of Way Completion: Future
• Construction Start: Future
• Construction Completion: Future
Estimated Construction Cost: $50,000,000 to
$60,000,000
PROJECT EVENTS
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange
Project Virtual Public Hearing
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/85829724839
( https://us06web.zoom.us/j/85829724839 )
Item 9.
Call -in information:
• iPhone one -tap: +13462487799,85829724839# or
+17207072699,85829724839#
• Telephone: 346-248-7799 or 720-707-2699
• Webinar ID: 858 2972 4839
Both alternatives include bicycle and pedestrian facilities and the realignment of Calimesa Boulevard to improve intersection spacing and operation.PHASE 1 project schedule
PROJECT DOCUMENTS
Notice of Intent to Adopt (/s/I 10-Cherry-Valley_NOA-1.pdf) (English & Spanish) Cherry Valley Project Fact Sheet (/s/Cherry-Valley-Blvd-Interchange-Fact-Sheet.pdf) (English & Spanish) Initial Study with (Proposed) Mitigated Negative Declaration/ Environmental Assessment (pdf) (/s/0G170_I-10- Cherry-Valley-IS-EA_122021 _reduced.pdf)
156
Connecting Our
Communities
home (/home-harris) 1 future projects (/clients) 1 current projects (/new -page) 1 sb-1 (/sb 1 -projects) 1 news (/news) 1 contact (/contact)
(951) 955-6800 1 [email protected] (mailto:
[email protected])
4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA 92501
www.rctlma.org/trans ( http://rctlma.org/trans)
(fp
Providing the citizens of Riverside
County with increasingly more
courteous, efficient, and cost
effective services dedicated to
improving the quality of life and
orderly economic development by
the provision and management of a
safe, efficient and convenient
transportation system, enhancing
the mobility of people, goods and
services within the integrated
Agency activities.
157
Interstate 10 (I-10)/Cherry Valley Boulevard
Interchange Project
CITY OF CALIMESA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DISTRICT 8 — RIV — 10 (PM R2.1/R3.8)
08-0G170/0800000190
Initial Study
with (Proposed) Mitigated Negative Declaration/
Environmental Assessment
Prepared by the
State of California Department of Transportation
and the City of Calimesa
The environmental review, consultation, and any other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried out by Caltrans pursuant to 23 U.S.
Code 327 and the Memorandum of Understanding dated December 23, 2016, and executed by the Federal Highway Administration and Caltrans.
December 2021
Item 9.
158
General Information About This Document
Item 9.
What's in this document:
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), as assigned by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), has prepared this Initial Study/Environmental Assessment (IS/EA) prepared, which examines the potential environmental impacts of the alternatives being considered for the proposed project located in the City of Calimesa, Riverside County, California. Caltrans is the lead agency under the Natural Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The document tells you why the project is being proposed, what alternatives have been considered for the project, how the existing environment could be affected by the project, the potential impacts of each of the alternatives, and the proposed avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation measures.
What you should do:
• Please read this document.
• Copies of this document and the related technical studies are available for review at the following locations:
- Caltrans District 8, 464 West 4th Street, San Bernardino, California 92401 - City of Calimesa, City Hall, 908 Park Avenue, Calimesa, California 92320 - Calimesa Library, 974 Calimesa Boulevard, Calimesa, California 92320 • This document may be downloaded at the following website: https://rcprojects.org/ • Participate in the virtual public hearing to be held on January 13, 2022 from 5:00 PM to 7:00 PM, accessed through the following link: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/85829724839 . • We would like to hear what you think. If you have any comments about the proposed project, please attend the public hearing and/or send your written comments to Caltrans by the deadline.
• Send comments via postal mail to: Shawn Oriaz, Senior Environmental Planner at Caltrans District 8, 464 W. 4th Street, 6th floor, MS -827, San Bernardino, CA 92401 • Send comments via email to: [email protected] • Send comments by the deadline: January 24, 2022
What happens next:
After comments are received from the public and reviewing agencies, Caltrans, as assigned by FHWA, may: (1) give environmental approval to the proposed project, (2) do additional environmental studies, or (3) abandon the project. If the project is given environmental approval and funding is appropriated, Caltrans could design and construct all or part of the project.
For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document can be made available in Braille, in large print, on audiocassette, or on computer disk. To obtain a copy in one of these alternate formats, please write to or call Terri Kasinga, Chief, Public and Media Affairs, 464 W. 4th Street, 6th floor, San Bernardino, CA 92401-1400; (909) 383-4646; or use the California Relay Service 1-800-735- 2929 (TTY to Voice), 1-800-735-2922 (Voice to TTY), 1-800-855-3000 (Spanish TTY to Voice and Voice to TTY), 1-800-854-7784 (Spanish and English Speech -to -Speech), or 711. 159
Item 9.
SCH #
08-RIV-10-PM R2.1/R3.8
08-0G170
PN 0800000190
Construction of interchange improvements at Interstate 10 (1-10) and Cherry Valley Boulevard, located at Post Mile (PM) Revised (R) 3.5 between PM R2.1 and PM R3.8 on 1-10 in the City of Calimesa, County of Riverside, California.
INITIAL STUDY
with (Proposed) Mitigated Negative Declaration/
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Submitted Pursuant to: (State) Division 13, California Public Resources Code (Federal) 42 U.S. Code 4332(2)(C)
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Transportation
and
Responsible Agencies: Riverside County Transportation Department and City of Calimesa
December 14, 2021
Date of Approval
for David Bricker
Deputy District Director
District 8 Division of Environmental
Planning
California Department of Transportation
CEQA/NEPA Lead Agency
The following individual can be contacted for more information about this document:
Shawn Oriaz
Senior Environmental
Planner
California Department of
Transportation
464 W. 4th Street
San Bernardino, CA 92401
(909) 388-7034
Mohamed Eissa
Associate Transportation
Planner
Riverside County
Transportation Department
3525 14th Street
Riverside, CA 92501
(951) 955-1506
Michael Thornton
City Engineer
City of Calimesa
908 Park Avenue
Calimesa, CA 92320
(909) 795-9801 x225
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • i 160
Item 9.
Alt
Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration
Pursuant to: Division 13, Public Resources Code
Project Description
The City of Calimesa (City), in cooperation with the California Transportation (Caltrans) and the County of Riverside (Co upgrade and reconfigure the existing I-10/Cherry Valley (project) from Post Mile (PM) R2.1 to R3.8, located in
County. The proposed project would upgrade and r
Boulevard at Interstate 10 (1-10) and realign Cali
flow within the project area. Cherry Valley Boul
in each direction within the project limits. Sidewalk
provided along Cherry Valley Boulevard to allow pe
corridor. Right -turn pockets would be • •ed approac
and eastbound on -ramp. Channelize• Id also
Boulevard to connect to Calimesa Bou
control at Calimesa Boulevard turning o
ramps at the interchange wo
The entry ramps in both
(CHP) enforcement ar
the freeway. A 1,30
ramp and a 3,400
Determination
This pr
inter
pro
MND
the pub
d i.
agencies
This does not
ject to chan
be realig
will acc
meteri
ary lane
, is
u evard Int
-western Rive
figure Cherry Valle
Boulev • to improve t - fic
woul idened to two lanes
cle facilities would be
access along the
he westbound on -ramp
ded on Cherry Valley
a signalized stop
ulevard. On- and off-
recons cted to multilane ramps.
odate California Highway Patrol
at reduce to a single lane entering
Id be added to the eastbound off -
to provide additional storage.
Id
ent of
sing to
nge
Ne• - Declaration (MND) is included to give notice to
e p that it is Caltrans' intent to adopt an MND for this n that altrans' decision regarding the project is final. This ased on comments received by interested agencies and
Caltrans has . an Initial Study (IS) for this project, and pending public review, expects termine from this IS that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment for the reasons discussed below.
The proposed I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project would have no effect on the following resources: Mineral Resources, Land Use and Planning, and Recreation.
In addition, the proposed I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project would have less than significant effects to: Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Energy, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 11 161
Item 9.
Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, Population and Housing, Public Services, Transportation, Tribal Cultural Resources, Utilities and Service Systems, and Wildfire.
With mitigation measures incorporated, the project would have less than significant effects to Biological Resources, Geology and Soils (paleontological resources), and Greenhouse Gas Emissions:
WET -1
The following regulatory approvals shall be obtained prior to commencement of any construction activities within - identified jurisdictional areas: 1) A determination from USAF a an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) or a Prelimi Jurisdictional Determination (PJD); 2) RWQCB CWA Sec ' ater Quality
Certification (WQC) or a Waste Discharg- •uire (WDR); and 3) CDFW Section 1602 Streambed Alt: i. n Agree SAA). As part of the regulatory approval proce- .ermanent and orary impacts on jurisdictional waters s •e mitigated at a min ratio of 1:1 at an approved mitigatio k, appli -sponsored igation area, or on site, in consultation
the r: ce agencies.
PAL -2 Prior to the commencement of grou ..turbing activities, a Principal Paleontologist who the Caltrans ification standards shall be retained to prepare . - nt a Pal - logical Mitigation Plan (PMP) for the project. - pr. _ • P sh. develop mitigation measures based on the sign- rankings as well as the
proposed d - • s of gro •' bance roughout the project area, as surface urface , ogic units are well documented while
eater d s remain undocumented. Depending on
ct's exca on depths, the type of monitoring shall
• Fo . categorized as High Potential: Full-time monitoring shall d for disturbance at all depths in selected areas with
nts. In subareas of High Potential, monitoring efforts
d or eliminated at the discretion of the Principal
tologist if no fossil resources are encountered after 50 t of the excavations are completed.
eas categorized as Low Potential: Spot-check monitoring is mmended for disturbance in particular areas at four feet or reater below ground surface (bgs) in intact sediments. If High Potential geologic units are encountered at depth in those particular locations during spot-check monitoring, those subareas shall be elevated to High Potential and monitoring shall be upgraded to full- time.
Monitoring shall not be required for excavations less than four feet bgs in subareas with Low Potential or within any subareas with artificial fill.
Although monitoring is not typically required in subareas of Low Potential, spot-check monitoring shall be implemented at the discretion of the Principal Paleontologist to confirm the presence of subsurface Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • iii 162
Item 9.
High Potential geologic units. In particular, deeper excavations of approximately 12 to 25 feet bgs for items such as bridge abutments, bent footings, and overhead sign foundations shall be spot-checked, as these construction activities may impact High Potential geologic units at depth.
All monitoring shall include the visual inspection of excavated or graded areas, trench sidewalls, spoils, and any other disturbed sediment. In the event that a paleontological resource is discovered, either the Principal Paleontologist or approved on -site • ' • ntological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily divert onstruction equipment around the find until it is assessed for ific significance and collected. Additionally, test samples of sed' ' m geologic units with High Potential shall be collected an reen- ' site to determine the presence of fossils in the s ' grain -size •ns. If significant small -fraction fossils are dis ' ed during the te sampling, larger bulk samples of sed is may be collected further processing in the laborator e reco - ded sampling shall follow best practice procedures in .tion ontology.
CC -1
CC -2
CC -3
CC -4
CC -5
CC -6
CC -7
CC -8
The project will incorporate facilities to
and bicyclists, including .Iks, cross
A Transportation Manag
final design phase to mini
construction.
The proj
LED tr
rate th
elp red
te mobility for pedestrians
and bicycle buffers.
prepared during the
idling during
of energy -efficient lighting, such as
the project's CO2 emissions.
The p • wil _ . _ •lete streets components, specifically pedestria calks and turn -lane bicycle buffers along Cherry Valley ard.
The pr
design in
District La
water-effi
nse
will i ent landscaping as determined during final
rdinat •n with the City of Calimesa and the Caltrans
cape Architect. This landscaping will include energy- and t irrigation systems and native plants as appropriate, to ergy and help offset any potential CO2 emissions increase. ject will recycle construction debris as practicable.
Tree removals required for project implementation will be subject to tree removal permit(s) associated requirements for replacement consistent with the City of Calimesa Zoning Code, Chapters 18.70 and
18.80. Idling is limited to five minutes for delivery and dump trucks and other diesel -powered equipment (with some exceptions).
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • iv 163
Item 9.
GHG-1
GHG-2
According to the Caltrans' Standard Specifications, the contractor must comply with all local Air Pollution Control District's (APCD) rules, ordinances, and regulations for air quality restrictions. This includes CARB's anti -idling rule (Section 2489 of the California Code of Regulations) and South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) Rule 2449 (In -Use Mobile Source Emission Reduction Programs).
According to the Caltrans Standard Specifications, idling time for lane closure during construction will be limited to 10 min in each direction. In addition, the contractor will comply w SCAQMD rules, ordinances, and regulations regarding air qual strictions.
GHG-3 The project will maintain equipment in pro' une . orking condition. Construction equipment flee • i be in co ce with Best Available Control Technology r ements.
GHG-4 Bids will be solicited that includ: - of ener► and fuel-effici t fleets in accordance with current pra
GHG-5 The project will use cement blende• he maximum feasible amount of fly ash or . ' - - materials th. . uce GHG emissions from cement production.
GHG-6
The project will incorp
emissions from solid wa
reductio g, and
s to reduce GHG
geme rough solid waste
GHG-7 The ect will ze ener• . nd fuel -efficient vehicles and e► ent tha - . nd ex. d U.S. EPA/NHTSA/CARB standards
re . to f emission reduction.
GHG-8 •e pro i l l use the minimum feasible amount of GHG-emitting terials.
David
Deputy Di
District 8 Div Environmental Planning
California Depa ent of Transportation
Date of Approval
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • v 164
Item 9.
Table of Contents
DRAFT Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration
Chapter 1 Proposed Project 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.1.1 Existing Facilities 4
1.1.2 Project Programming 4
1.2 Purpose and Need 5
1.2.1 Purpose 5
1.2.2 Need 5
1.3 Project Description 35
1.4 Alternatives 35
1.4.1 Project Alternatives 35
1.4.2 Common Design Features of the Build Alternatives 35
1.4.3 Unique Features of Build Alternatives 63
1.4.4 Transportation Demand Management (TDM), Transportation System Management (TSM), and Mass Transit Alternatives 67
1.4.5 Alternative 1 (No -Build Alternative) 68
1.4.6 Comparison of Alternatives 68
1.4.7 Identification of a Locally Preferred Alternative 77
1.4.8 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Further Discussion 77
1.5 Permits and Approvals Needed 79
Chapter 2 Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures 80
2.1 Human Environment 80
2.1.1 Land Use 80
2.1.2 Parks and Recreational Facilities 92
2.1.3 Farmlands 99
2.1.4 Growth 102
2.1.5 Community Character and Cohesion 105
2.1.6 Relocations and Real Property Acquisition 115
2.1.7 Environmental Justice 121
2.1.8 Utilities and Emergency Services 128
2.1.9 Traffic and Transportation/Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities 132
2.1.10 Visual/Aesthetics 220
2.1.11 Cultural Resources 225
2.2 Physical Environment 229
2.2.1 Hydrology and Floodplain 229
2.2.2 Water Quality and Stormwater Runoff 233
2.2.3 Geology, Soils, Seismicity, and Topography 243
2.2.4 Paleontology 250
2.2.5 Hazardous Waste and Materials 259
2.2.6 Air Quality 276
2.2.7 Noise and Vibration 307
2.2.8 Energy 372
2.3 Biological Environment 387
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • vi 165
Item 9.
2.3.1 Natural Communities 387
2.3.2 Wetlands and Other Waters 398
2.3.3 Plant Species 405
2.3.4 Animal Species 409
2.3.5 Threatened and Endangered Species 427
2.3.6 Invasive Species 438
2.3.7 Cumulative Impacts 439
Chapter 3 CEQA Evaluation 447
3.1 Determining Significance Under CEQA 447
3.2 CEQA Environmental Checklist 448
3.2.1 Aesthetics 449
3.2.2 Agriculture and Forest Resources 452
3.2.3 Air Quality 454
3.2.4 Biological Resources 457
3.2.5 Cultural Resources 463
3.2.6 Energy 465
3.2.7 Geology and Soils 468
3.2.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 472
3.2.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 475
3.2.10 Hydrology and Water Quality 479
3.2.11 Land Use and Planning 483
3.2.12 Mineral Resources 484
3.2.13 Noise 485
3.2.14 Population and Housing 487
3.2.15 Public Services 489
3.2.16 Recreation 491
3.2.17 Transportation 492
3.2.18 Tribal Cultural Resources 494
3.2.19 Utilities and Service Systems 496
3.2.20 Wildfire 498
3.2.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance 500
3.3 Wildfire 503
3.4 Climate Change 507
3.4.1 Regulatory Setting 507
3.4.2 Environmental Setting 511
3.4.3 Project Analysis 519
3.4.4 Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategies 525
3.4.5 Adaptation 530
Chapter 4 Comments and Coordination 538
Chapter 5 List of Preparers 595
Chapter 6 Distribution List 598
Appendix A Resources Evaluated Relative to the Requirements of Section 4(f):
No -Use Determination 606
Appendix B Title VI Policy Statement 616
Appendix C Summary of Relocation Benefits and Right -of -Way Acquisition 617 Appendix D List of Acronyms 624
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • vii 166
Item 9.
Appendix E Avoidance, Minimization and/or Mitigation Summary 636 Environmental Commitments Record (ECR) 639
Appendix F List of Technical Studies 653
Appendix G Farmland Conversion Impact Rating Form 654
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • viii 167
Item 9.
List of Figures
Figure 1-1: Regional Vicinity 2
Figure 1-2: Site Vicinity 3
Figure 1-3: Alternative 1 (No -Build) 36
Figure 1-4: Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond) 37
Figure 1-4a: Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond) 39 Figure 1-4b: Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond) 41 Figure 1-4c: Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond) 43 Figure 1-4d: Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond) 45 Figure 1-4e: Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond) 47 Figure 1-5: Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf) 49 Figure 1-5a: Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf) 51 Figure 1-5b: Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf) 53 Figure 1-5c: Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf) 55 Figure 1-5d: Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf) 57 Figure 1-5e: Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf) 59 Figure 2.1.1-1: General Plan Land Use Designations 82
Figure 2.1.1-2: Planned City and County Projects 84
Figure 2.1.3-1: Important Farmland Map 100
Figure 2.1.4-1: Analysis Considerations of Determining Potential for Project - Related Growth 104
Figure 2.1.5-1: Study Area Census Tract Boundaries 107
Figure 2.1.6-1: Build Alternative 3 Potential ROW Acquisition Map 117 Figure 2.1.6-2: Build Alternative 4 Potential ROW Acquisition Map 118 Figure 2.1.9-1: Traffic Study Area 135
Figure 2.1.9-2: Existing (2019) Peak Hour Freeway Volumes 144 Figure 2.1.9-3: Existing (2019) Peak Hour Freeway Volumes 145 Figure 2.1.9-4: Opening Year (No -Build) 2025 Peak Hour Freeway Volumes 158
Figure 2.1.9-5: Opening Year (No -Build) 2025 Peak Hour Intersection Volumes 161
Figure 2.1.9-6: Design Year (No -Build) 2045 Peak Hour Freeway Volumes 168
Figure 2.1.9-7: Design Year (No -Build Alternative) 2045 Peak Hour Intersection Volumes 169
Figure 2.1.9-8: Opening Year (2025) Peak Hour Freeway Volumes Build Alternative 3 180
Figure 2.1.9-9: Opening Year (2025) Peak Hour Freeway Volumes Build Alternative 4 181
Figure 2.1.9-10: Opening Year (2025) Peak Hour Intersection Volumes Build Alternative 3 183
Figure 2.1.9-11: Opening Year (2025) Peak Hour Intersection Volumes Build Alternative 4 185
Figure 2.1.9-12: Design Year (2045) Peak Hour Freeway Volumes Build Alternative 3 198
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • ix 168
Item 9.
Figure 2.1.9-13: Design Year (2045) Peak Hour Freeway Volumes Build Alternative 4 199
Figure 2.1.9-14: Design Year (2045) Peak Hour Intersection Volumes Build Alternative 3 205
Figure 2.1.9-15: Design Year (2045) Peak Hour Intersection Volumes Build Alternative 4 207
Figure 2.2.1-1: Flood Zones 231
Figure 2.2.2-1: Receiving Waters 239
Figure 2.2.3-1: Regional Fault Map 246
Figure 2.2.4-1: Geologic Units within the Project Vicinity 251 Figure 2.2.6-1: Air Quality Monitoring Stations Located Near the Project 288 Figure 2.2.6-2: Sensitive Land Use Receptors Near the Project 291 Figure 2.2.7-1: Noise Levels for Common Activities 309
Figure 2.2.7-2: Noise Measurement, Modeled Receiver, and Soundwall Locations (Sheet 1 of 10) 313
Figure 2.2.7-3: Noise Measurement, Modeled Receiver, and Soundwall Locations (Sheet 2 of 10) 315
Figure 2.2.7-4: Noise Measurement, Modeled Receiver, and Soundwall Locations (Sheet 1 of 10) 317
Figure 2.2.7-5: Noise Measurement, Modeled Receiver, and Soundwall Locations (Sheet 3 of 10) 319
Figure 2.2.7-6: Noise Measurement, Modeled Receiver, and Soundwall Locations (Sheet 4 of 10) 321
Figure 2.2.7-7 Noise Measurement, Modeled Receiver, and Soundwall Locations (Sheet 5 of 10) 323
Figure 2.2.7-8: Noise Measurement, Modeled Receiver, and Soundwall Locations (Sheet 6 of 10) 325
Figure 2.2.7-9: Noise Measurement, Modeled Receiver, and Soundwall Locations (Sheet 7 of 10) 327
Figure 2.2.7-10: Noise Measurement, Modeled Receiver, and Soundwall Locations (Sheet 8 of 10) 329
Figure 2.2.7-11 Noise Measurement, Modeled Receiver, and Soundwall Locations (Sheet 9 of 10) 331
Figure 2.3.1-1: Biological Study Area 388
Figure 2.3.1-2: Vegetation Communities and Other Land Uses 390 Figure 3.3-1: Fire Severity 505
Figure 3.4-1: U.S. 2019 Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Source: U.S. EPA 2021c) 512
Figure 3.4-2: California 2018 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 513 Figure 3.4-3: Change in California Gross Domestic Product, Population, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Since 2000 514
Figure 3.4-4: Possible Use of Traffic Operation Strategies in Reducing On - road CO2 Emissions 520
Figure 3.4-5: California Climate Strategy 526
Figure A-1: Resources Evaluated Relative to the Requirements of Section 4(f) 607
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • x 169
Item 9.
List of Tables
Table 1-1: Intersection LOS 7
Table 1-2a: Intersection Operations - Existing (2019) Conditions 11 Table 1-2b: Intersection Operations - Opening Year (2025) No -Build Conditions 12
Table 1-2c: Intersection Operations — Opening Year (2025) Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond) Conditions 13
Table 1-2d: Intersection Operations — Opening Year (2025) Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf) Conditions 14
Table 1-2e: Intersection Operations —Design Year (2045) No -Build Conditions 15 Table 1-2f: Intersection Operations —Design Year (2045) Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond) Conditions 16
Table 1-2g: Intersection Operations —Design Year (2045) Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf) Conditions 17
Table 1-3: Freeway Mainline and Ramp Junction/Weave Section LOS Threshold 18
Table 1-4a: Freeway Mainline Operations — Existing (2019) 1-10 Eastbound Conditions 19
Table 1-4b: Freeway Mainline Operations — Existing (2019) 1-10 Westbound Conditions 20
Table 1-4c: Freeway Mainline Operations — Opening Year (2025) 1-10 Eastbound No -Build Conditions 20
Table 1-4d: Freeway Mainline Operations — Opening Year (2025) 1-10 Eastbound Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond) Conditions .21 Table 1-4e: Freeway Mainline Operations — Opening Year (2025) 1-10 Eastbound Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf) Conditions 21 Table 1-4f: Freeway Mainline Operations — Opening Year (2025) 1-10 Westbound No -Build Conditions 22
Table 1-4g: Freeway Mainline Operations — Opening Year (2025) 1-10 Westbound Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond) Conditions 23 Table 1-4h: Freeway Mainline Operations — Opening Year (2025) 1-10 Westbound Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf) Conditions 24 Table 1-4i: Freeway Mainline Operations — Design Year (2045) 1-10 Eastbound No -Build Conditions 25
Table 1-4j: Freeway Mainline Operations — Design Year (2045) 1-10 Eastbound Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond) Conditions .25 Table 1-4k: Freeway Mainline Operations — Design Year (2045) 1-10 Eastbound Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf) Conditions 26 Table 1-41: Freeway Mainline Operations — Design Year (2045) 1-10 Westbound No -Build Conditions 27
Table 1-4m: Freeway Mainline Operations — Design Year (2045) 1-10 Westbound Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond) Conditions 28 Table 1-4n: Freeway Mainline Operations — Design Year (2045) 1-10 Westbound Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf) Conditions 29 Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • xi 170
Item 9.
Table 1-5a: Collision Summary — Actual Collision Rate 30 Table 1-5b: Collision Summary — Statewide Average Collision Rate 30 Table 1-6: Ramp Collision Types 31
Table 1-7: Primary Collision Factors 31
Table 1-8: Utility Relocation Summary 62
Table 1-9: Potential Temporary Right -of -Way Acquisitions and Relocations — Build Alternative 3 64
Table 1-10: Potential Permanent Right -of -Way Acquisitions and Relocations — Build Alternative 3 65
Table 1-11: Build Alternative 3 Cost Estimates (Escalated) 65 Table 1-12: Potential Temporary Right -of -Way Acquisitions and Relocations — Build Alternative 4 66
Table 1-13: Potential Permanent Right -of -Way Acquisitions and Relocations — Build Alternative 4 66
Table 1-14: Build Alternative 4 Cost Estimates (Escalated) 67 Table 1-15: Alternatives Comparison — Project Features and Design Standards 68
Table 1-16: Environmental Impacts 74
Table 1-17: Permits, Licenses, Agreements and Certifications 79 Table 2.1.1-1: General Plan and Specific/Community Plans Land Use Designations 83
Table 2.1.1-2: Planned Projects in the City of Calimesa 85 Table 2.1.1-3: Planned Projects in the County of Riverside 85 Table 2.1.1-4: Consistency with State, Regional, and Local Plans and Programs 89
Table 2.1.3-1: Farmland Conversion by Alternative 102
Table 2.1.5-1: Regional, Local, and Study Area Demographics 108 Table 2.1.5-2: Ethnic and Racial Composition 109
Table 2.1.5-3: Regional, Local, and Project Area Income and Poverty Levels 112
Table 2.1.6-1: Potential Partial Temporary (TCE) ROW Acquisitions 119 Table 2.1.6-2: Potential Permanent ROW Acquisitions and Relocations 120 Table 2.1.7-1: Ethnic and Racial Composition 122
Table 2.1.8-1: Utility Relocations 131
Table 2.1.9-1: Freeway Mainline and Ramp Junction/Weave Section LOS Threshold 140
Table 2.1.9-2: Level of Service Definitions for Unsignalized Intersections 141 Table 2.1.9-3: Level of Service Definitions for Signalized Intersections 142 Table 2.1.9-4: Existing Conditions (2019) Eastbound 1-10 Operations (AM)147 Table 2.1.9-5: Existing Conditions (2019) Eastbound 1-10 Operations (PM)147 Table 2.1.9-6: Existing Conditions (2019) Westbound 1-10 Operations (AM) 148
Table 2.1.9-7: Existing Conditions (2019) 1-10 Operations Westbound (PM) 148
Table 2.1.9-8: Existing Conditions (2019) Intersection Operations (AM) 149 Table 2.1.9-9: Existing Conditions (2019) Intersection Operations (PM) 149 Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • xii 171
Item 9.
Table 2.1.9-10: Existing Conditions (2019) Intersection Queueing Summary 150
Table 2.1.9-11: Existing Conditions Performance Summary 152 Table 2.1.9-12: Travel Time — Eastbound 1-10: Singleton Road to Oak Valley Parkway 152
Table 2.1.9-13: Westbound 1-10: Singleton Road to Oak Valley Parkway 152 Table 2.1.9-14: Collision Summary — Actual Collision Rate 153 Table 2.1.9-15: Collision Summary — Statewide Average Collision Rate 153 Table 2.1.9-16: Ramp Collision Types 154
Table 2.1.9-17: Primary Collision Factors 155
Table 2.1.9-18: Opening Year 2025 - Freeway Operations (No -Build Alternative) (AM Peak Hour) 157
Table 2.1.9-19: Opening Year 2025 - Freeway Operations (No -Build Alternative) (AM Peak Hour) 159
Table 2.1.9-20: Opening Year 2025 - Freeway Operations (No -Build Alternative) (PM Peak Hour) 159
Table 2.1.9-21: Opening Year 2025 - Freeway Operations (No -Build Alternative) (PM Peak Hour) 160
Table 2.1.9-22: Opening Year 2025 Conditions - Intersection Operations (No - Build Alternative) (AM Peak Hour) 163
Table 2.1.9-23: Opening Year 2025 Conditions - Intersection Operations (No - Build Alternative) (PM Peak Hour) 163
Table 2.1.9-24: No -Build Alternative Intersection Queue Summary (Opening Year 2025) 166
Table 2.1.9-25: No -Build Alternative (Opening Year 2025) Performance Summary 167
Table 2.1.9-26: Travel Time — Eastbound 1-10: Singleton Road to Oak Valley Parkway (Opening Year 2025) 167
Table 2.1.9-27: Travel Time — Westbound 1-10: Singleton Road to Oak Valley Parkway (Opening Year 2025) 167
Table 2.1.9-28: Design Year 2045 - Freeway Operations (No -Build Alternative) (AM Peak Hour) 172
Table 2.1.9-29: Design Year 2045 - Freeway Operations (No -Build Alternative) (PM Peak Hour) 172
Table 2.1.9-30: Design Year 2045 - Freeway Operations (No -Build Alternative) (AM Peak Hour) 173
Table 2.1.9-31: Design Year 2045 - Freeway Operations (No -Build Alternative) (PM Peak Hour) 173
Table 2.1.9-32: Intersection Operations — Design Year 2045 Conditions (No - Build Alternative) (AM Peak Hour) 174
Table 2.1.9-33: Intersection Operations — Design Year 2045 Conditions (No - Build Alternative) (PM Peak Hour) 174
Table 2.1.9-34: No -Build Alternatives Intersection Queue Summary (Design Year 2045) 177
Table 2.1.9-35: No -Build Alternative (Design Year 2045) Performance Summary 178
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • xiii 172
Item 9.
Table 2.1.9-36: Travel Time Eastbound 1-10: Singleton Road to Oak Valley Parkway (No Build Alternative) (Design Year 2045) 178
Table 2.1.9-37: Travel Time Westbound 1-10: Singleton Road to Oak Valley Parkway (No Build Alternative) (Design Year 2045) 178
Table 2.1.9-38: Opening Year 2025 Eastbound Segment Build Alternative 3 (AM Peak Hour) 179
Table 2.1.9-39: Opening Year 2025 Eastbound Segment Build Alternative 3 (PM Peak Hour) 187
Table 2.1.9-40: Opening Year 2025 Westbound Segment Build Alternative 3 (AM Peak Hour) 187
Table 2.1.9-41: Opening Year 2025 Westbound Segment Build Alternative 3 (PM Peak Hour) 188
Table 2.1.9-42: Opening Year 2025 Eastbound Segment Build Alternatives 4 (AM Peak Hour) 188
Table 2.1.9-43: Opening Year 2025 Eastbound Segment Build Alternative 4 (PM Peak Hour) 189
Table 2.1.9-44: Opening Year 2025 Westbound Segment Build Alternatives 4 (AM Peak Hour) 189
Table 2.1.9-45: Opening Year 2025 Westbound Segment Build Alternatives 4 (PM Peak Hour) 190
Table 2.1.9-46: Intersection Operations — Opening Year 2025 Conditions Build Alternative 3 (AM Peak Hour) 191
Table 2.1.9-47: Intersection Operations — Opening Year 2025 Conditions Build Alternatives 3 (PM Peak Hour) 191
Table 2.1.9-48: Intersection Operations — Opening Year 2025 Conditions Build Alternative 4 (AM Peak Hour) 192
Table 2.1.9-49: Intersection Operations — Opening Year 2025 Conditions Build Alternatives 4 (PM Hour) 193
Table 2.1.9-50: Build Alternative 3 Intersection Queue Summary (Opening Year 2025) 194
Table 2.1.9-51: Build Alternative 4 Intersection Queue Summary (Opening Year 2025) 195
Table 2.1.9-52: Build Alternative 3 (Opening Year 2025) 196 Table 2.1.9-53: Travel Time Eastbound 1-10: Singleton Road to Oak Valley Parkway (Build Alternative 3) (Opening Year 2025) 196
Table 2.1.9-54: Travel Time Westbound 1-10: Singleton Road to Oak Valley Parkway (Build Alternative 3) (Opening Year 2025) 196
Table 2.1.9-55: Build Alternative 4 (Opening Year 2025) 196 Table 2.1.9-56: Travel Time Eastbound 1-10: Singleton Road to Oak Valley Parkway (Build Alternative 4) (Opening Year 2025) 197
Table 2.1.9-57: Travel Time Westbound 1-10: Singleton Road to Oak Valley Parkway (Build Alternative 3) (Opening Year 2025) 197
Table 2.1.9-58: Design Year 2045 Eastbound Segment Build Alternative 3 (AM Peak Hour) 200
Table 2.1.9-59: Design Year 2045 Eastbound Segment Build Alternative 3 (PM Peak Hour) 201
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • xiv 173
Item 9.
Table 2.1.9-60: Design Year 2045 Westbound Segment Build Alternative 3 (AM Peak Hour) 201
Table 2.1.9-61: Design Year 2045 Westbound Segment Build Alternative 3 (PM Peak Hour) 202
Table 2.1.9-62: Design Year 2045 Eastbound Segment Build Alternative 4 (AM Peak Hour) 202
Table 2.1.9-63: Design Year 2045 Eastbound Segment Build Alternative 4 (PM Peak Hour) 203
Table 2.1.9-64: Design Year 2045 Westbound Segment Build Alternative 4 (AM Peak Hour) 203
Table 2.1.9-65: Design Year 2045 Westbound Segment Build Alternative 4 (PM Peak Hour) 204
Table 2.1.9-66: Intersection Operations — Design Year 2045 Conditions Build Alternative 3 (AM Peak Hour) 209
Table 2.1.9-67: Intersection Operations — Design Year 2045 Conditions Build Alternative 3 (PM Peak Hour) 209
Table 2.1.9-68: Intersection Operations — Design Year 2045 Conditions Build Alternative 4 (AM Peak Hour) 210
Table 2.1.9-69: Intersection Operations — Design Year 2045 Conditions Build Alternative 4 (PM Hour) 211
Table 2.1.9-70: Design Year (2045) Intersection Queue Summary - Build Alternative 3 213
Table 2.1.9-71: Design Year (2045) Intersection Queue Summary - Build Alternative 4 214
Table 2.1.9-72: Build Alternative 3 (Design Year 2045) Performance Summary 215
Table 2.1.9-73: Travel Time Eastbound 1-10: Singleton Road to Oak Valley Parkway (Build Alternative 3) (Design Year 2045) 215
Table 2.1.9-74: Travel Time Westbound 1-10: Singleton Road to Oak Valley Parkway Build Alternative 3) (Design Year 2045) 215
Table 2.1.9-75: Build Alternative 4 (Design Year 2045) Performance Summary 216
Table 2.1.9-76: Travel Time Eastbound 1-10: Singleton Road to Oak Valley Parkway (Build Alternative 4) (Design Year 2045) 216
Table 2.1.9-77 Travel Time — Westbound 1-10: Singleton Road to Oak Valley Parkway Build Alternative 4) (Design Year 2045) 216
Table 2.2.2-1: Impervious Surface Area for Build Alternatives 242 Table 2.2.4-1: Paleontology Sensitivity Scale (Caltrans) 255 Table 2.2.4-2: Paleontology Sensitivity Scale (Riverside County) 256 Table 2.2.5-1 Regulatory Properties of Concern 263
Table 2.2.6-1: State and Federal Criteria Air Pollutant Standards, Effects, and Sources 280
Table 2.2.6-2: Ozone Pollutant Concentrations Measured 287 Table 2.2.6-3: Carbon Monoxide Pollutant Concentrations Measured 289 Table 2.2.6-4: Particulate Matter (PMio) Pollutant Concentrations Measured 289
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • xv 174
Item 9.
Table 2.2.6-5: Particulate Matter (PM25) Pollutant Concentrations Measured 289
Table 2.2.6-6: Nitrogen Dioxide Pollutant Concentrations Measured 290 Table 2.2.6-7: Status of SIPs Relevant to the Project Area 290 Table 2.2.6-8: Construction Phase Emission Estimates - Build Alternative 3 293
Table 2.2.6-9: Construction Phase Emission Estimates - Build Alternative 4 293
Table 2.2.6-10: Operational Criteria Pollutant Emissions 295 Table 2.2.6-11: Net Operational Criteria Pollutant Emissions Comparison to Existing Conditions 295
Table 2.2.6-12: Net Operational Criteria Pollutant Emissions Comparison to No -Build Conditions 296
Table 2.2.6-13: Existing/Baseline (2019) Traffic Volumes 298 Table 2.2.6-14: Opening Year (2025) Traffic Volumes - No -Build Alternative 298
Table 2.2.6-15: Opening Year (2025) Traffic Volumes - Build Alternative 3.298 Table 2.2.6-16: Opening Year (2025) Traffic Volumes - Build Alternative 4.299 Table 2.2.6-17: Design Year (2045) Traffic Volumes - No -Build Alternative 299 Table 2.2.6-18: Design Year (2045) Traffic Volumes - Build Alternative 3 299 Table 2.2.6-19: Design Year (2045) Traffic Volumes Build Alternative 4 299 Table 2.2.6-20: Opening -Year (2025) Intersection Operations Analysis - No - Build Alternative 301
Table 2.2.6-21: Opening -Year (2025) Intersection Operations Analysis - Build Alternative 3 301
Table 2.2.6-22: Opening -Year (2025) Intersection Operations Analysis - Build Alternative 4 302
Table 2.2.6-23: Design -Year (2045) Intersection Operations Analysis- No - Build Alternative 302
Table 2.2.6-24: Design -Year (2045) Intersection Operations Analysis- Build Alternative 3 303
Table 2.2.6-25: Design -Year (2045) Intersection Operations Analysis- Build Alternative 4 303
Table 2.2.7-1: Noise Abatement Criteria 308
Table 2.2.7-2: Short -Term Noise Measurement Results 334 Table 2.2.7-3: Long -Term Noise Measurement Results 337 Table 2.2.7-4: Noise Model Calibration Results 337
Table 2.2.7-5: Construction Equipment Noise 338
Table 2.2.7-6: Predicted Future Noise Levels and Barrier Analysis at Edge of Shoulder — Alternative 3 346
Table 2.2.7-7: Predicted Future Noise Levels and Barrier Analysis at Right -of - Way — Alternative 3 349
Table 2.2.7-8: Predicted Future Noise Levels and Barrier Analysis at Private Property — Alternative 3 352
Table 2.2.7-9: Predicted Future Noise Levels and Barrier Analysis at Edge of Shoulder - Alternative 4 355
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • xvi 175
Item 9.
Table 2.2.7-10: Predicted Future Noise Levels and Barrier Analysis at Right - of -Way — Alternative 4 358
Table 2.2.7-11: Predicted Future Noise Levels and Barrier Analysis at Private Property - Alternative 4 361
Table 2.2.7-12: Summary of Abatement Key Information —Alternative 3 — Soundwall S379 at Private Property 365
Table 2.2.7-13: Summary of Abatement Key Information —Alternative 4 — Soundwall S379 at Private Property 366
Table 2.2.7-14: Summary of Abatement Key Information —Alternative 3 — Soundwall S401 at EOS 367
Table 2.2.7-15: Summary of Abatement Key Information —Alternative 3 — Soundwall S401 at ROW 367
Table 2.2.7-16: Summary of Abatement Key Information —Alternative 3 — Soundwall S401 at Private Property 367
Table 2.2.7-17: Summary of Abatement Key Information —Alternative 4 — Soundwall S401 at EOS 368
Table 2.2.7-18: Summary of Abatement Key Information —Alternative 4 — Soundwall S401 at ROW 368
Table 2.2.7-19: Summary of Abatement Key Information —Alternative 4 — Soundwall S401 at Private Property 368
Table 2.2.7-20: Summary of Abatement Key Information Alternative 3 — Soundwall S436 at Private Property 369
Table 2.2.7-21: Summary of Abatement Key Information Alternative 4 — Soundwall S436 at Private Property 370
Tables 2.2.7-22: Summary of Abatement Key Information —Alternative 3 — Soundwall S452 at EOS 371
Tables 2.2.7-23: Summary of Abatement Key Information —Alternative 3 — Soundwall S452 at Private Property 371
Tables 2.2.7-24: Summary of Abatement Key Information —Alternative 4 — Soundwall S452 at EOS 371
Tables 2.2.7-25: Summary of Abatement Key Information —Alternative 4 — Soundwall S452 at Private Property 372
Table 2.2.8-1: Existing (2019) Operational Vehicle Miles Traveled 373 Table 2.2.8-2: Annual Direct Energy Use (Mobile Sources) (Existing Year 2019) 373
Table 2.2.8-3: Petroleum Consumption in California 2018 376 Table 2.2.8-4: Traditional Fuel Consumption in California for the Transportation Sector in 2018 376
Table 2.2.8-5: Direct Energy Use During 2 -Year Construction Period (Build Alternative 3) 379
Table 2.2.8-6: Direct Energy Use During 2 -Year Construction Period (Build Alternative 4) 379
Table 2.2.8-7: Operational Vehicle Miles by Alternative (Opening Year 2025) 381
Table 2.2.8-8: Operational Vehicle Miles by Alternative (Design Year 2045) 381
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • xvii 176
Item 9.
Table 2.2.8-9: Annual Direct Energy Use (Mobile Sources) (Opening Year 2025) 382
Table 2.2.8-10: Annual Direct Energy Use (Mobile Sources) (Design Year 2045) 382
Table 2.2.8-11: Indirect Energy Use Factors 383
Table 2.2.8-12: Indirect Energy Use in the Project Study Area (Opening Year 2025) 385
Table 2.2.8-13: Indirect Energy Use in the Project Study Area (Design Year 2045) 385
Table 2.2.8-14: Indirect Energy Use in the SCAG Regional Area (Opening Year 2025) 386
Table 2.2.8-15: Indirect Energy Use in the SCAG Regional Area (Design Year 2045) 386
Table 2.3.1-1: Existing Vegetation 389
Table 2.3.1-2: Build Alternative 3 Impacts to Vegetation Communities and Other Land Uses 396
Table 2.3.1-3: Build Alternative 4 Impacts to Vegetation Communities and Other Land Uses 397
Table 2.3.2-1: Summary of Jurisdictional Areas 403
Table 2.3.2-2: Corps/RWQCB Jurisdictional Impact Summary 404 Table 2.3.2-3: CDFW Jurisdictional Impact Summary 404
Table 2.3.5-1: Effects Determination for Identified Endangered Species - Crustaceans 429
Table 2.3.5-2: Effects Determination for Identified Endangered Species - Fish 430
Table 2.3.5-3: Effects Determination for Identified Endangered Species - Insects 431
Table 2.3.5-4: Effects Determination for Identified Endangered Species - Birds 431
Table 2.3.5-5: Effects Determination for Identified Endangered Species:
Flowering Plants 433
Table 2.3.5-6: Effects Determination for Identified Endangered Species:
Amphibians 435
Table 2.3.5-7: Effects Determination for Identified Endangered Species:
Mammals 436
Table 2.4-1: City of Calimesa Reasonably Foreseeable Projects 442 Table 2.4-2: Riverside County Reasonably Foreseeable Projects 443 Table 3.3-1: Emergency Response Plan Summary 504
Table 3.4-1: Regional and Local Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan 515 Table 3.4-2: Summary of Operational GHG Emissions -Opening Year 2025 522
Table 4.1-1 Summary of Native American Consultation 538 Table C-1: Potential Partial Temporary (TCE) ROW Acquisitions 622 Table C-2: Potential Permanent ROW Acquisitions and Relocations 623 Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • xviii 177
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Chapter 1 Proposed Project
National Environmental Policy Act Assignment
California participated in the "Surface Transportation Project Delivery Pilot Program" (Pilot Program) pursuant to 23 United States Code (USC) 327, for more than five years, beginning July 1, 2007, and ending September 30, 2012. MAP -21 (P.L. 112-141), signed by President Obama on July 6, 2012, amended 23 USC 327 to establish a permanent Surface Transportation Project Delivery Program. As a result, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding pursuant to 23 USC 327 (National Environmental Policy Act [NEPA] Assignment Memorandum of Understanding [MOU]) with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The NEPA Assignment MOU became effective October 1, 2012 and was renewed on December 23, 2016 for a term of five years. In summary, Caltrans continues to assume FHWA responsibilities under NEPA and other federal environmental laws in the same manner as was assigned under the Pilot Program, with minor changes.
With NEPA Assignment, FHWA assigned, and Caltrans assumed all of the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) Secretary's responsibilities under NEPA. This assignment includes projects on the State Highway System and Local Assistance Projects off of the State Highway System within the State of California, except for certain categorical exclusions that FHWA assigned to Caltrans under the 23 USC 326 CE Assignment MOU, projects excluded by definition, and specific project exclusions.
1.1 Introduction
Caltrans, as assigned by the FHWA, is the lead agency under the NEPA.
Caltrans is also the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City of Calimesa (City), in cooperation with Caltrans and the Riverside County Transportation Department (RCTD), proposes to upgrade and reconfigure Cherry Valley Boulevard at Interstate 10 (1-10) to improve traffic flow within the project area. The proposed Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange would be located on 1-10 at Post Mile (PM) R3.5, between PM R2.1 and PM R3.8, in the City of Calimesa, within Riverside County. The existing I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange is located on 1-10 between Singleton Road and Oak Valley Parkway; refer to Figure 1-1, Regional Vicinity, and Figure 1-2, Site Vicinity.
The I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange is a major access point for existing and proposed residential and commercial development. The existing configuration is a diamond interchange, with all -way stop control at the ramp termini. The on- and off -ramps at the interchange consist of one lane.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 1 178
Figure 1-1: Regional Vicinity
Vi okapi I le
Raaparfa
Rancho
Curamonpa
—nialln
Rater side
Coma
ll vc,I ru SCAs.
^'ISCr di Ikill
Mori
Yarlsy
Sun
City
Encinlias
Lucerne
Valle/
Tam eon Pa
Mira
Nina
A aI,ninn
Escondign
Santee
Ca AledraI
Rancho
IdyihriId Mirage
Santa
Vannel
Warner
Spr lops
Pal
eseri
llorrego
SaTInpS
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
SAN BE N RDI J [I
D n i r N 1 Y
Tao entynine
Palms
Reaehella
Mum
q' Calipalri
a IN I Ile
Illytha
INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
INTERSTATE HI/CHERRY VALLEY RCIJLEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT Regional Vicinity
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 2 Figure 1.1
Item 9.
179
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Figure 1-2: Site Vicinity
Source. USGS, El C uu Quadrangle, California - Riverside County, 2018
SUBJECT SITE
s
1000 2000
FEET
BUENA MESA OR
Desert Lawn
imarial Park
BROOKSIDE AVE
INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
INTERSTATE 10/CHERRY VALLEY BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT Site Vicinity
01/2021 J141621 71
Figure 1-2
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 3 180
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
1.1.1 Existing Facilities
Interstate 10
Within the project area, 1-10 is a six -lane divided freeway with three 12 -foot - wide, mixed flow lanes in each direction, and 16 -foot -wide inside and 12 -foot - wide outside shoulders. A concrete barrier separates the eastbound and westbound lanes of traffic. The existing right-of-way (ROW) width is 200 to 300 feet with access control on either side, where applicable. 1-10 is included in the National Highway System (NHS), the Rural and Single Interstate Routing System (RSIRS), and the Strategic Highway Corridor Network (STRAHNET). It is also a Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA) Route for use by oversized trucks. The segment within the project limits is functionally classified as an Urbanized Freeway. 1-10 is a major transportation route that connects the City of Calimesa to Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties to the west, and the State of Arizona to the east. It is functionally classified as an Interstate and is included in the State Freeway and Expressway System. Based on historic aerials of the project site, the portion of 1-10 within the project limits was constructed prior to 1954.
The 2017 1-10 Transportation Concept Report (TCR) shows that six lanes (which includes both directions) are required on 1-10 through the project limits to attain a Level of Service (LOS) "E" rating. The project is consistent with the identified goals of the TCR and is recognized as one of the strategies to achieve the corridor concept.
Cherry Valley Boulevard
Cherry Valley Boulevard begins at the Noble Street intersection, approximately four miles east of 1-10, which then travels westerly through the City of Calimesa, and travels southwest, west of 1-10, and ends at the Fairways residential community. Within the project area, Cherry Valley Boulevard is a two-lane roadway, one lane in each direction, with a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour west of the interchange and a posted speed limit of 55 miles per hour east of the interchange. Per the City of Calimesa's General Plan, dated August 4, 2014, Cherry Valley Boulevard is classified as a Major Arterial. The Cherry Valley Boulevard Overcrossing (00) (PM R3.05, Bridge Number 56-0481) is a four -span, concrete -girder bridge constructed in 1965 and is approximately 273 feet long, 47 feet wide, and crosses six lanes of traffic over 1-10.
1.1.2 Project Programming
The project will be locally funded with Transportation Uniform Mitigation Funds (TUMF) administered by the Western Riverside Council of Governments. Federal funding is being considered for this project via Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) funds. At this time, no State funding has been identified for this project. The estimated project cost for Build Alternative 3 is $60,432,000 and for Build Alternative 4 is Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 4 181
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
$63,854,000. The project is included in the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)'s 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) [Project ID RIV060116], as well as the 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) [Project ID RIV060116]. The project entry in the 2021 FTIP identifies the following scope of work: "I-10/Cherry Valley Blvd. ("Boulevard") IC ("Interchange"):
Replacement of existing curved overcrossing extending 500 linear feet from Roberts Road (south) to approximately 1,000 ft ("feet") E/O ("east of") Calimesa Blvd. Associated project improvements include realignment of Calimesa Blvd. and ramp realignment/widening for all four ramps (CMAQ PM
2.5 Benefits Project)."
1.2 Purpose and Need
1.2.1 Purpose
The purpose of the project is to:
• Relieve congestion and improve traffic operations at the Interstate 10 (I- 10)/Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange;
• Address increased travel associated with existing and planned development anticipated in the City of Calimesa and surrounding areas; and • Improve existing interchange geometry.
1.2.2 Need
Due to expected continuing increases in traffic volumes associated with planned development in the project area, the interchange is expected to not satisfy applicable operational performance standards by the design horizon year of 2045. Additionally, the existing gaps in pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure across the interchange break the multi -modal connection between communities and businesses on either side of 1-10. Lastly, the existing ramp alignments, ramp intersections, and Cherry Valley Boulevard contain nonstandard geometric features. Without the project, the operation of the interchange will continue to deteriorate unacceptable levels of service, resulting in increased congestion, delays, energy consumption, and air pollution.
Transportation Demand and Safety
Project alternatives were analyzed within the Traffic Operations Analysis Report (dated November 2020) prepared for the project under the existing year (2019), opening year (2025), and design year (2045) conditions. The study scenarios for traffic operations analysis include the following:
• Existing (2019) Conditions
• Opening Year (2025) No -Build Alternative
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 5 182
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
• Opening Year (2025) Build Alternative 3 - Diverging Diamond • Opening Year (2025) Build Alternative 4 - Partial Cloverleaf • Design Year (2045) No -Build Alternative
• Design Year (2045) Build Alternative 3 - Diverging Diamond • Design Year (2045) Build Alternative 4 - Partial Cloverleaf A full description of the No -Build Alternative, Build Alternative 3, and Build Alternative 4 is included in Section 1.4, Alternatives.
Capacity and Level of Service
This section describes the existing and forecast traffic data for intersection, roadway segment, and expressway traffic operational conditions, and accident review. Traffic forecasts were developed for study facilities as part of the Interstate 10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document (EA 0G170) Traffic Operations Analysis Report (see Appendix C of the Traffic Operations Analysis Report [Traffic Report] for the project, dated December 2020). The study area consists of study intersections along Cherry Valley Boulevard (between Palmer Avenue to the south and Calimesa Boulevard to the north), the 1-10 mainline eastbound and westbound segments between Singleton Road and Oak Valley Parkway, and 1-10 ramp intersections at Singleton Road, Cherry Valley Boulevard, and Oak Valley Parkway; refer to Figure 2.1.9-1, Traffic Study Area. The study facilities are identified below and were evaluated during the weekday AM (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and PM (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) peak hours at study intersections and mainline/ramp locations and on a weekday basis for study arterial roadway segments.
Study Intersections
The following intersections were studied:
• I-10 Eastbound On -Ramp / Singleton Road
• I-10 Westbound Off -Ramp / Singleton Road
• Cherry Valley Boulevard / Palmer Avenue / Desert Lawn Drive • Cherry Valley Boulevard / Roberts Road
• I-10 Eastbound Off/On-Ramps / Cherry Valley Boulevard • I-10 Westbound Off/On-Ramps / Cherry Valley Boulevard • Cherry Valley Boulevard / Calimesa Boulevard
• I-10 Eastbound Off/On-Ramps / Oak Valley Parkway
• I-10 Westbound Off/On-Ramps / Oak Valley Parkway
1-10 Mainline Segments
The following 1-10 eastbound mainline segments were studied:
• I-10 Merge from Singleton Road
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 6 183
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
• 1-10 Mainline between Singleton Road and Cherry Valley Boulevard • 1-10 Diverge to Cherry Valley Boulevard
• 1-10 Mainline between Cherry Valley Boulevard and Oak Valley Parkway • 1-10 Diverge to Oak Valley Parkway
The following 1-10 westbound mainline segments were studied:
• 1-10 Merge from Oak Valley Parkway
• 1-10 Mainline between Oak Valley Parkway and Cherry Valley Boulevard • 1-10 Diverge to Cherry Valley Boulevard
• 1-10 Merge from Cherry Valley Boulevard
• 1-10 Mainline between Cherry Valley Boulevard and Singleton Road Intersection Operations
Analysis Methodology
The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Sixth Edition methodology for signalized intersections estimates the average control delay for vehicles at the intersection while the methodology for unsignalized intersections estimates the worst -case movement control delay for two-way stop -controlled intersections and the average control delay for all -way stop controlled intersections. After the quantitative delay estimates are complete, the methodology assigns a qualitative letter grade that represents the operations of the intersection. These grades range from LOS A (minimal delay) to LOS F (congested conditions). LOS E represents at -capacity operations.
Descriptions of the LOS letter grades for both signalized and unsignalized intersections are provided in Table 1-1, Intersection LOS.
Table 1-1: Intersection LOS
LOS
Description
Signalized
Intersections
(Average Stopped
Delay per Vehicle
[seconds per
vehicle])
Unsignalized
Intersections
(Average
Control Delay
[seconds per
vehicle])
A
Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression and/or short cycle length.
10.0 to 20.0
>10.0 to 15.0
C
Operations with average delays resulting from fair
progression and or/longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to appear.
>20.0 to 35.0
>15.0 to 25.0
D
Operations with longer delays due to a combination of
unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high V/C ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable.
>35.0 to 55.0
>25.0 to 35.0
E
Operations with high delay values indicating poor
progression, long cycle lengths, or high V/C ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. >55.0 to 80.0
>35.0 to 50.0
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 7 184
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
LOS
Description
Signalized
Intersections
(Average Stopped
Delay per Vehicle
[seconds per
vehicle])
Unsignalized
Intersections
(Average
Control Delay
[seconds per
vehicle])
F
Operation with delays unacceptable to most drivers
occurring due to over saturation, poor progression, or
very long cycle lengths.
>80.0
>50.0
Notes: 1. Volume over capacity greater than or equal to one (V/C > 1) is considered LOS F.
Source: Transportation Research Board 2016.
Future Traffic Demand Forecast
According to SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, the SCAG region's population which encompasses Riverside, Imperial, San Bernardino, Orange, Los Angeles, and Ventura Counties is projected to grow to 22,504,000 by 2045, an increase of 2,986,000 from 2020. According to SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, population in the SCAG region increased by 2,944,000 people between 2000 and 2020; this represents an increase of approximately 17.7 percent. Riverside County grew by 60.11 percent during the same period (SCAG 2020). The SCAG region is expected to have a 0.6 percent annual growth rate between 2020 and 2045, which corresponds to about 114,000 new residents annually, or nearly three million new residents between 2020 and 2045 (SCAG 2020).
According to the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, the population of Riverside County more than doubled from 663,166 in 1980 to 1,545,387 in 2000, and more than tripled to 2,493,000 in 2020 (SCAG 2020). Furthermore, and according to the U.S. Census, American Community Survey, the population of Riverside County as of 2018 was 2,450,758, which is a 11.9 percent increase from 2010.
SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS indicates that there will be a deconcentration trend toward more growth of population and employment in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. The share of both Riverside and San Bernardino Counties' population in the SCAG region is projected to increase 27.9 percent from 2020 to 2040, while the share of both Riverside and San Bernardino Counties' employment in the SCAG region is projected to increase 30.7 percent from 2020 to 2040. As indicated in the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, the recent growth trend experienced in Riverside County's expansion is due to new communities that began to emerge during the housing boom. Four additional cities have incorporated since 2006 (Wildomar, Menifee, Eastvale, and Jurupa Valley), increasing the total number of local jurisdictions in the SCAG region to 197. Many areas in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties were appealing for development due to the availability of lower -priced land, which attracted new residents looking for lower -priced housing. However, jobs and employment did not follow in proportion to housing unit growth in these communities and residents had to travel longer distances on average than other Southern California county residents to reach their workplace.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 8 185
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Based on the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, recently the annual population growth in the SCAG region has slowed, from about 0.85 percent in 2020 and projected to be about 0.45 percent by 2045, a trend similar to that of the State as a whole. These changes are driven by declines in fertility, high housing costs and lack of affordability, and an aging population. If the region continues to experience faster employment growth in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties, where an abundant labor force is available, the region's transportation and air quality problems may be reduced due to more balanced county distribution of population and employment.
According to SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, population, households, and employment growth in the City of Calimesa will dramatically increase in the next 25 years. More specifically, the City's population is projected to increase from 8,500 people in 2016, to 20,600 in 2045. Households will increase from 3,400 in 2016 to 10,400 in 2045, and employment will increase from 1,600 in 2016 to 4,100 in 2045. Overall, the County's population is expected to increase from 2,493,000 people in 2020 to approximately 3,252,000 in 2045, an increase of approximately 30 percent.
Intersection Analysis
Tables 1-2a through 1-2g, summarize the LOS for study area intersections without the project and with the project (Build Alternatives 3 and 4) for Existing (2019), Opening Year (2025), and Design Year (2045) scenarios.
As shown in Table 1-2a, the 1-10 westbound off-ramp/Singleton Road side - street stop controlled intersection, Old Roberts Road/Cherry Valley Boulevard all -way stop controlled intersection, and 1-10 westbound off- and on- ramps/Cherry Valley Boulevard all -way stop controlled intersection currently operates at an LOS E condition under the AM peak hour. The 1-10 westbound and eastbound off and on-ramps/Oak Valley Parkway all -way stop controlled intersections currently operate at a worst -case movement/approach LOS F condition under the AM peak hour. All other intersections currently operate at acceptable LOS C or better conditions.
As shown in Table 1-2b, under the Opening Year (2025) No -Build scenario, five study intersections are projected to operate at deficient LOS E or F during the AM peak hour: Cherry Valley Boulevard/Palmer Avenue/Desert Lawn Drive, Cherry Valley Boulevard/Roberts Road, 1-10 eastbound off/on- ramps/Cherry Valley Boulevard, 1-10 westbound off/on-ramps/Cherry Valley Boulevard, and Calimesa Boulevard/Cherry Valley Boulevard. Three intersections are projected to operate at deficient LOS F during the PM peak hour: Cherry Valley Boulevard/Palmer Avenue/Desert Lawn Drive, Cherry Valley Boulevard/Roberts Road, and 1-10 eastbound off/on-ramps/Cherry Valley Boulevard. All other intersections are projected operate at acceptable LOS C or better conditions.
Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond) and Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf) are projected to perform similarly under the Opening Year (2025).
As shown in Tables 1-2c and 1-2d, all intersections are projected to operate Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 9 186
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
acceptably based on LOS and the delay at all the study intersections. The deficient intersections associated with the existing conditions (Cherry Valley Boulevard/Palmer Avenue/Desert Lawn Drive, Cherry Valley Boulevard/Roberts Road, 1-10 eastbound off/on-ramps/Cherry Valley Boulevard, 1-10 westbound off/on-ramps/Cherry Valley Boulevard, and Calimesa Boulevard/Cherry Valley Boulevard) are projected to improve to LOS C or better during the AM and PM peak hours under both build alternatives and all other intersections are projected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS C or better conditions.
As shown in Table 1-2e, under the Design Year (2045) No -Build scenario, six study intersections are projected to operate at deficient LOS E or F under the during the AM peak hour: 1-10 westbound off/on-ramps/Singleton Road, Cherry Valley Boulevard/ Palmer Avenue/Desert Lawn Drive, Cherry Valley Boulevard/Roberts Road, 1-10 eastbound off/on-ramps/Cherry Valley Boulevard, 1-10 westbound off/on-ramps/Cherry Valley Boulevard, and 1-10 westbound off/on-ramps/Oak Valley Parkway. Six intersections are projected to operate at deficient LOS E or F during the PM peak hour: 1-10 eastbound off/on-ramps/Singleton Road, 1-10 westbound off/on-ramps/Singleton Road, Cherry Valley Boulevard/Palmer Avenue/Desert Lawn Drive, Cherry Valley Boulevard/Roberts Road, 1-10 eastbound off/on-ramps/Cherry Valley Boulevard, and 1-10 westbound off/on-ramps/Cherry Valley Boulevard. All other intersections are projected operate at acceptable LOS C or better conditions.
Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond) and Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf) are projected to perform similarly under the Opening Year (2025).
As shown in Tables 1-2f and 1-2g, all intersections are projected to operate acceptably (LOS C or better), with the exception of the following intersections:
1-10 eastbound off/on-ramps/Singleton Road (PM peak hour for both Build Alternatives 3 and 4), 1-10 westbound off/on-ramps/Singleton Road (AM peak hour for both Build Alternatives 3 and 4 and PM peak hour for Build Alternative 4 only), and Cherry Valley Boulevard/Roberts Road (PM peak hour for both Build Alternatives 3 and 4). The remaining deficient intersections associated with the existing conditions (Cherry Valley Boulevard/Palmer Avenue/Desert Lawn Drive, 1-10 eastbound off/on-ramps/Cherry Valley Boulevard, 1-10 westbound off/on-ramps/Cherry Valley Boulevard, and 1-10 westbound off/on-ramps/Oak Valley Parkway) are projected to improve to LOS C or better during the AM and PM peak hours under both build alternatives and all other intersections are projected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS C or better conditions.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 10 187
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Table 1-2a: Intersection Operations - Existing (2019) Conditions Item 9.
No.
Study Intersection
Control Type
AM Peak Hour
Delay (sec/veh)
AM Peak
Hour LOS
PM Peak Hour
Delay (sec/veh)
PM Peak
Hour LOS
1 1-10 EB On-Ramp/Singleton Road
Uncontrolled
0.7 (WBL)
A
0.6 (WBL)
A
2 1-10 WB Off-Ramp/Singleton Road
Side -street Stop
36.8 (NBL)
E
7.6 (NBR)
A
3 Cherry Valley Boulevard/Palmer Avenue/Desert Lawn
Drive
Signal
34.9 C
8.3 A
4a
Cherry Valley Boulevard/Roberts Road
Signal
13 (NBT)
B
7.6 (NBL)
A
4b
Old Roberts Road/Cherry Valley Boulevard
All -way Stop
36.4 E
2.5 A
5 1-10 EB Off/On-Ramps/Cherry Valley Boulevard
All -way Stop
8.8 A
22.6 C
6 1-10 WB Off/On-Ramps/Cherry Valley Boulevard
All -way Stop
39.3 E
5 A
7 Calimesa Boulevard/Cherry Valley Boulevard
Side -street Stop
18.5 (SBL)
C
11.1 B
8 1-10 EB Off/On-Ramps/Oak Valley Parkway
All -way Stop
99.5 F
22.9 C
9 1-10 WB Off/On-Ramps/Oak Valley Parkway
All -way Stop
88.3 F
20.3 C
Notes: 1. Sec/Veh = Seconds per Vehicle, LOS = Level of Service, EB = Eastbound, WB = Westbound, WBL = Westbound Left, NBL = Northbound Left, NBR = Northbound Right, NBT = Northbound Through, SBL = Southbound Left.
2. For signal and all -way stop control, the overall intersection LOS and average delay (in seconds per vehicle) are reported.
3. For side street control, the worst movement LOS and delay are reported with the worst movement listed in parentheses.
4. Bold font indicates LOS D (for City of Calimesa intersections), E or F conditions (for Caltrans intersections).
Source: Fehr & Peers, 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document (EA 0G170) Traffic Operations Analysis Report, March 2020.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 11 188
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Table 1-2b: Intersection Operations - Opening Year (2025) No -Build Conditions Item 9.
No.
Study Intersection
Control Type
AM Peak Hour
Delay (sec/veh)
AM Peak
Hour LOS
PM Peak Hour
Delay (sec/veh)
PM Peak
Hour LOS
1 1-10 EB Off/On-Ramps/Singleton Road
Uncontrolled
9.9 (SBR)
A
12.6 (SBL)
B
2 1-10 WB Off/On-Ramps/Singleton Road
Side -street Stop
8.0 (NBL)
A
11.1 (NBR)
B
3 Cherry Valley Boulevard/Palmer Avenue/Desert Lawn
Drive
Signal
499.7
F
378.1
F
4a
Cherry Valley Boulevard/Roberts Road
Signal
166.5
F
318.6
F
4b
Old Roberts Road/Cherry Valley Boulevard
--
--
--
--
--
5 1-10 EB Off/On-Ram s/Cher Valle Boulevard
Si nal
70.4 E
125.8
F
6 1-10 WB Off/On-Ram s/Cher Valle Boulevard
Si nal
57.4 E
27.1 C
7 Calimesa Boulevard/Cherry Valley Boulevard
Side -street Stop/
Si na1
146.4 (WBT)
F
14.2 (SBL)
C
8 1-10 EB Off/On-Ram s/Oak Valle Parkwa
Si nal
11.1 B
17.1 B
9 1-10 WB Off/On-Ramps/Oak Valley Parkway
Signal
8.4 A
11.0 B
Notes: 1. Sec/Veh = Seconds per Vehicle, LOS = Level of Service, EB = Eastbound, WB = Westbound, SBR = Southbound Right, SBL = Southbound Left, NBL = Northbound Left, NBR = Northbound Right, WBT = Westbound Through
2. For signal and all -way stop, the overall intersection LOS and average delay (in seconds per vehicle) are reported.
3. For side street stop control, the worst movement LOS and delay are reported with the worst movement listed in parentheses.
4. Bold font indicates LOS D (for City of Calimesa intersections), E or F conditions (for Caltrans intersections).
5. Intersection 4B is closed under Opening Year (2025) Conditions.
6. Intersections 5 and 6 are signalized under No -Build, Diverging Diamond, and Partial Cloverleaf scenarios.
7. Intersection 6 becomes an uncontrolled on -ramp, and the off -ramp and loop on -ramp are aligned with Intersection 7 under the Partial Cloverleaf Alternative.
8. Intersection 7 is side -street stop -controlled under the No -Build scenario, and is signalized under all other scenarios.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document (EA OG170) Traffic Operations Analysis Report, March 2020.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 12 189
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Table 1-2c: Intersection Operations — Opening Year (2025) Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond) Conditions Item 9.
No.
Study Intersection
Control Type
AM Peak Hour
Delay (sec/veh)
AM Peak
Hour LOS
PM Peak Hour
Delay (sec/veh)
PM Peak
Hour LOS
1 1-10 EB Off/On-Ramps/Singleton Road
Uncontrolled
10.3 (SBL)
B
11.4 (SBL)
B
2 1-10 WB Off/On-Ramps/Singleton Road
Side -street Stop
9.0 (NBL)
A
14.4 (NBL)
B
3 Cherry Valley Boulevard/Palmer Avenue/Desert Lawn
Drive
Signal
27.7 C
22.1 C
4a
Cher Valle Boulevard/Roberts Road
Si. nal
13.5 B
19.0 B
4b
Old Roberts Road/Cherry Valley Boulevard
--
--
--
--
--
5 1-10 EB Off/On-Ram •s/Cher Valle Boulevard
Si. nal
22.0 C
14.7 B
6 1-10 WB Off/On-Ramos/Cher Valle Boulevard
Signal
7.1 A
5.7 A
7 Calimesa Boulevard/Cherry Valley Boulevard
Side -street Stop/
Si • nal
22.0 C
9.5 A
8 1-10 EB Off/On-Ram • s/Oak Valle Parkwa
Si • nal
11.1 B
17.4 B
9 1-10 WB Off/On-Ramps/Oak Valley Parkway
Signal
8.6 A
10.9 B
Notes: 1. Sec/Veh = Seconds per Vehicle, LOS = Level of Service, EB = Eastbound, WB = Westbound, SBL = Southbound Left, NBL = Northbound Left
2. For signal and all -way stop, the overall intersection LOS and average delay (in seconds per vehicle) are reported.
3. For side street stop control, the worst movement LOS and delay are reported with the worst movement listed in parentheses.
4. Bold font indicates LOS D (for City of Calimesa intersections), E or F conditions (for Caltrans intersections).
5. Intersection 48 is closed under Opening Year (2025) Conditions.
6. Intersections 5 and 6 are signalized under No -Build, Diverging Diamond, and Partial Cloverleaf scenarios.
7. Intersection 6 becomes an uncontrolled on -ramp, and the off -ramp and loop on -ramp are aligned with Intersection 7 under the Partial Cloverleaf Alternative.
8. Intersection 7 is side -street stop -controlled under the No -Build scenario, and is signalized under all other scenarios.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document (EA 0G170) Traffic Operations Analysis Report, March 2020.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 13 190
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Table 1-2d: Intersection Operations — Opening Year (2025) Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf) Conditions Item 9.
No.
Study Intersection
Control Type
AM Peak Hour
Delay (sec/veh)
AM Peak
Hour LOS
PM Peak Hour
Delay (sec/veh)
PM Peak
Hour LOS
1 1-10 EB Off/On-Ramps/Singleton Road
Uncontrolled
10.7 (SBL)
B
11.2 (SBL)
B
2 1-10 WB Off/On-Ramps/Singleton Road
Side -street Stop
10.2 (NBL)
B
11.3 (NBR)
B
3 Cherry Valley Boulevard/Palmer Avenue/Desert Lawn
Drive
Signal
25.8 C
20.8 C
4a
Cherry Valley Boulevard/Roberts Road
Signal
12.3 B
19.0 B
4b
Old Roberts Road/Cherry Valley Boulevard
--
--
--
--
--
5 1-10 EB Off/On-Ram s/Cher Valle Boulevard
Si nal
11.4 B
13.4 B
6 1-10 WB Off/On-Ram s/Cher Valle Boulevard
Si nal
--
--
--
--
7 Calimesa Boulevard/Cherry Valley Boulevard
Side -street Stop/
Signal
20.6 C
15.2 B
8 1-10 EB Off/On-Ram s/Oak Valle Parkwa
Si nal
11.6 B
17.0 B
9 1-10 WB Off/On-Ramps/Oak Valley Parkway
Signal
8.9 A
11.1 B
Notes: 1. Sec/Veh = Seconds per Vehicle, LOS = Level of Service, EB = Eastbound, WB = Westbound, SBL = Southbound Left, NBL = Northbound Left, NBR = Northbound Right
2. For signal and all -way stop, the overall intersection LOS and average delay (in seconds per vehicle) are reported.
3. For side street stop control, the worst movement LOS and delay are reported with the worst movement listed in parentheses.
4. Bold font indicates LOS D (for City of Calimesa intersections), E or F conditions (for Caltrans intersections).
5. Intersection 48 is closed under Opening Year (2025) Conditions.
6. Intersections 5 and 6 are signalized under No -Build, Diverging Diamond, and Partial Cloverleaf scenarios.
7. Intersection 6 becomes an uncontrolled on -ramp, and the off -ramp and loop on -ramp are aligned with Intersection 7 under the Partial Cloverleaf Alternative.
8. Intersection 7 is side -street stop -controlled under the No -Build scenario, and is signalized under all other scenarios.
Source: Fehr & Peers, I-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document (EA OG170) Traffic Operations Analysis Report, March 2020.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 14 191
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Table 1-2e: Intersection Operations —Design Year (2045) No -Build Conditions Item 9.
No.
Study Intersection
Control Type
AM Peak Hour
Delay (sec/veh)
AM Peak
Hour LOS
PM Peak Hour
Delay (sec/veh)
PM Peak
Hour LOS
1 1-10 EB Off/On-Ramps/Singleton Road
Signal
29.3 C
143.6
F
2 1-10 WB Off/On-Ramps/Singleton Road
Signal
60.8 E
150.5
F
3 Cherry Valley Boulevard/Palmer Avenue/Desert Lawn
Drive
Signal
994.6
F
171.4
F
4a
Cherry Valley Boulevard/Roberts Road
Signal
264.8
F
174.7
F
4b
Old Roberts Road/Cherry Valley Boulevard
--
--
--
--
--
5 1-10 EB Off/On-Ram s/Cher Valle Boulevard
Si nal
108.9
F
103.8
F
6 1-10 WB Off/On-Ram s/Cher Valle Boulevard
Si nal
100.0
F
64.6 E
7 Calimesa Boulevard/Cherry Valley Boulevard
Side -street Stop/
Si nal
20.5 (SBL)
C
21.1 (SBL)
C
8 1-10 EB Off/On-Ram s/Oak Valle Parkwa
Si nal
15.4 B
18.4 B
9 1-10 WB Off/On-Ramps/Oak Valley Parkway
Signal
56.0 E
12.0 B
Notes: 1. Sec/Veh = Seconds per Vehicle, LOS = Level of Service, EB = Eastbound, WB = Westbound, SBL = Southbound Left
2. For signal and all -way stop, the overall intersection LOS and average delay (in seconds per vehicle) are reported.
3. For side street stop control, the worst movement LOS and delay are reported with the worst movement listed in parentheses.
4. Bold font indicates LOS D (for City of Calimesa intersections), E or F conditions (for Caltrans intersections).
5. Intersection 48 is closed under Design Year (2045) Conditions.
6. Intersections 5 and 6 are signalized under No -Build, Diverging Diamond, and Partial Cloverleaf scenarios.
7. Intersection 6 becomes an uncontrolled on -ramp, and the off -ramp and loop on -ramp are aligned with Intersection 7 under the Partial Cloverleaf Alternative.
8. Intersection 7 is side -street stop -controlled under the No -Build scenario, and is signalized under all other scenarios.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document (EA 0G170) Traffic Operations Analysis Report, March 2020.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 15 192
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Table 1-2f: Intersection Operations —Design Year (2045) Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond) Conditions Item 9.
No.
Study Intersection
Control Type
AM Peak Hour
Delay (sec/veh)
AM Peak
Hour LOS
PM Peak Hour
Delay (sec/veh)
PM Peak
Hour LOS
1 1-10 EB Off/On-Ramps/Singleton Road
Signal
29.1 C
57.2 E
2 1-10 WB Off/On-Ramps/Singleton Road
Signal
71.2 E
53.8 D
3 Cherry Valley Boulevard/Palmer Avenue/Desert Lawn
Drive
Signal
25.9 C
18.2 B
4a
Cherry Valley Boulevard/Roberts Road
Signal
26.1 C
63.8 E
4b
Old Roberts Road/Cherry Valley Boulevard
--
--
--
--
--
5 1-10 EB Off/On-Ram s/Cher Valle Boulevard
Si nal
24.3 C
16.9 B
6 1-10 WB Off/On-Ram s/Cher Valle Boulevard
Si nal
11.3 B
8.9 A
7 Calimesa Boulevard/Cherry Valley Boulevard
Side -street Stop/
Si nal
22.1 C
9.3 A
8 1-10 EB Off/On-Ram s/Oak Valle Parkwa
Si nal
14.3 B
31.2 C
9 1-10 WB Off/On-Ram s/Oak Valle Parkwa
Si nal
10.8 B
12.7 B
Notes: 1. Sec/Veh = Seconds per Vehicle, LOS = Level of Service, EB = Eastbound, WB = Westbound
2. For signal and all -way stop, the overall intersection LOS and average delay (in seconds per vehicle) are reported.
3. For side street stop control, the worst movement LOS and delay are reported with the worst movement listed in parentheses.
4. Bold font indicates LOS D (for City of Calimesa intersections), E or F conditions (for Caltrans intersections).
5. Intersection 48 is closed under Design Year (2045) Conditions.
6. Intersections 5 and 6 are signalized under No -Build, Diverging Diamond, and Partial Cloverleaf scenarios.
7. Intersection 6 becomes an uncontrolled on -ramp, and the off -ramp and loop on -ramp are aligned with Intersection 7 under the Partial Cloverleaf Alternative.
8. Intersection 7 is side -street stop -controlled under the No -Build scenario, and is signalized under all other scenarios.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document (EA OG170) Traffic Operations Analysis Report, March 2020.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 16 193
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Table 1-2g: Intersection Operations —Design Year (2045) Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf) Conditions Item 9.
No.
Study Intersection
Control Type
AM Peak Hour
Delay (sec/veh)
AM Peak
Hour LOS
PM Peak Hour
Delay (sec/veh)
PM Peak
Hour
LOS
1 1-10 EB Off/On-Ramps/Singleton Road
Signal
29.1 C
56.1 E
2 1-10 WB Off/On-Ramps/Singleton Road
Signal
69.0 E
57.0 E
3 Cherry Valley Boulevard/Palmer Avenue/Desert Lawn
Drive
Signal
23.8 C
17.2 B
4a
Cherry Valley Boulevard/Roberts Road
Signal
23.4 C
66.5 E
4b
Old Roberts Road/Cherry Valley Boulevard
--
--
--
--
--
5 1-10 EB Off/On-Ramps/Cherry Valley Boulevard
Signal
10.4 B
19.7 B
6 1-10 WB Off/On-Ramps/Cherry Valley Boulevard
Signal
--
--
--
7 Calimesa Boulevard/Cherry Valley Boulevard
Side street Stop/
Signal
25.5 C
18.6 B
8 1-10 EB Off/On-Ramps/Oak Valley Parkway
Signal
14.5 B
32.4 C
9 1-10 WB Off/On-Ramps/Oak Valley Parkway
Signal
11.0 B
13.0 B
Notes: 1. SecNeh = Seconds per Vehicle, LOS = Level of Service, EB = Eastbound, WB = Westbound
2. For signal and all -way stop, the overall intersection LOS and average delay (in seconds per vehicle) are reported.
3. For side street stop control, the worst movement LOS and delay are reported with the worst movement listed in parentheses.
4. Bold font indicates LOS D (for City of Calimesa intersections), E or F conditions (for Caltrans intersections).
5. Intersection 48 is closed under Design Year (2045) Conditions.
6. Intersections 5 and 6 are signalized under No -Build, Diverging Diamond, and Partial Cloverleaf scenarios.
7. Intersection 6 becomes an uncontrolled on -ramp, and the off -ramp and loop on -ramp are aligned with Intersection 7 under the Partial Cloverleaf Alternative.
8. Intersection 7 is side -street stop -controlled under the No -Build scenario, and is signalized under all other scenarios.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document (EA OG170) Traffic Operations Analysis Report, March 2020.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 17 194
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Freeway Mainline Operations
Methodology
Freeway mainline and ramps were evaluated using a Highway Capacity Software (HCS) equivalent tool which applies methodologies contained in the Highway Capacity Manual, Sixth Edition (HCM) (Transportation Research Board, 2016). The LOS was calculated for each study facility based on density in number of vehicles per hour per lane. Table 1-3, Freeway Mainline and Ramp Junction/Weave Section LOS Threshold, describes the LOS thresholds for freeway sections identified in the HCM 2016.
Table 1-3: Freeway Mainline and Ramp Junction/Weave Section LOS Threshold
Level
of
Service
Description
Multilane
(Basic)
Density
(vplpm)
Mainline
(Weave)
Density
(vplpm)
Ramp/Merge/
Diverge
Density
(vplpm)
A
Free -flow speeds prevail. Vehicles are
almost completely unimpeded in their ability
to maneuver within the traffic stream.
11 to 18
>10 to 20
>10 to 20
C
Flow with speeds at or near free -flow
speeds. Freedom to maneuver within the
traffic stream is noticeably restricted, and
lane changes require more care and
vigilance on the part of the driver.
>18 to 26
>20 to 28
>20 to 28
D
Speeds decline slightly with increasing
flows. Freedom to maneuver with the traffic
stream is more noticeably limited, and the
driver experiences reduced physical and
s cholo 'cal comfort.
>16 to 35
>28 to 35
>28 to 35
E
Operation at capacity. There are virtually no
usable gaps within the traffic stream,
leaving little room to maneuver. Any
disruption can be expected to produce a
breakdown with queuing.
>35 to 45
>35 to 43
>35 to 452
F
Represents a breakdown in flow.
Density >45
or volume
over
capacity
greater than
or equal to
one (V/C>_1)
Density >43
or volume
over
capacity
greater than
or equal to
one (V/C_>1)
Density >45
or volume
over capacity
greater than
or equal to
one (V/C_>1)
Notes: 1. Density is reported in vehicles per lane per mile (vplpm).
2. The maximum density for ramp junctions and merge/diverge sections under LOS E is not defined in the HCM. The maximum density for basic segments of 45 vplpm was assumed to apply to ramp junctions and weaving sections.
3. Volume over capacity greater than or equal to one (V/C > 1) will be considered LOS F.
Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, 2016.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 18 195
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Freeway Mainline Analysis
Tables 1-4a through 1-4n show the density and LOS for the study freeway mainline segments and ramp junctions along 1-10 for the eastbound and westbound direction without and with the project (Build Alternatives 3 and 4) for Existing (2019), Opening Year (2025), and Design Year (2045) scenarios.
As shown in Table 1-4a, all the study segments along eastbound 1-10 currently operate at LOS C or better during both the AM and PM peak hours.
As shown in Tables 1-4b, all westbound segments south of Cherry Valley Boulevard currently operate at LOS C or better during both the AM and PM peak hours, and all westbound segments north of Cherry Valley Boulevard currently operate at a deficient LOS F during the AM peak hour, but operate at LOS C or better during the PM peak hour.
As shown in Table 1-4c, all 1-10 eastbound mainline segments are projected to operate at LOS B or better for the Opening Year (2025) No -Build scenario, with the exception of the Singleton on -ramp segment (PM peak hour) and the Cherry Valley Boulevard off -ramp segment (PM peak hour).
Table 1-4a: Freeway Mainline Operations — Existing (2019) 1-10 Eastbound Conditions
Facility Type (Mainline Segment)
Facility
Type
AM Delay
(sec/veh)
AM
LOS
PM Delay
(sec/veh)
PM
LOS
North of Singleton Road
Basic
12.9 B
18.2 C
Singleton On -Ramp
Merge
11.1 B
15.4 B
Singleton Road On -Ramp to Cherry
Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Basic
13.0 B
18.1 C
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Diverge
13.8 B
20.2 C
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp to
On -Ramp
Basic
13.3 B
13.5 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
Merge
9.6 A
15.3 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp to
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp
Basic
13.7 B
16.5 B
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp
Diverge
13.6 B
16.7 B
South of Oak Valley Parkway
Basic
14.3 B
15.1 B
Notes: 1. SecNeh = Seconds per Vehicle, LOS = Level of Service
2. The LOS and density (in vehicles per lane per mile) are reported.
3. Bold font indicates LOS E or F conditions.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document (EA 0G170) Traffic Operations Analysis Report, March 2020.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 19 196
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Table 1-4b: Freeway Mainline Operations - Existing (2019) 1-10 Westbound Conditions
Facility Type (Mainline Segment)
Facility
Type
AM Delay
(sec/veh)
AM
LOS
PM Delay
(sec/veh)
PM
LOS
South of Oak Valley Parkway
Basic
17.6 B
18.2 C
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp
Diverge
17.9 B
19.1 C
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp to
Oak Valley Parkway On -Ramp
Basic
15.0 B
15.1 B
Oak Valley Parkway On -Ramp
Merge
15.7 B
13.6 B
Oak Valley Parkway On -Ramp to
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Basic
18.8 C
17.2 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Diverge
33.2 D
17.3 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp to
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
Basic
86.9 F
15.1 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
Merge
117.0
F
15.2 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp to
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Basic
112.9
F
18.5 C
Singleton Off -Ramp
Diverge
116.8
F
19.3 C
North of Singleton
Basic
114.8
F
17.3 B
Notes: 1. Sec/Veh = Seconds per Vehicle, LOS = Level of Service
2. The LOS and density (in vehicles per lane per mile) are reported.
3. Bold font indicates LOS E or F conditions.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document (EA OG170) Traffic Operations Analysis Report, March 2020.
Table 1-4c: Freeway Mainline Operations - Opening Year (2025) 1-10 Eastbound No -Build Conditions
Facility Type (Mainline Segment)
Facility
Type
AM Delay
(sec/veh)
AM
LOS
PM Delay
(sec/veh)
PM
LOS
North of Singleton Road
Basic
10.1 B
14.2 B
Singleton On -Ramp
Merge
11.4 B
33.9 D
Singleton Road On -Ramp to Cherry
Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Basic
12.0 B
19.0 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Diverge
13.8 B
43.2 F
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp to
On -Ramp
Basic
11.4 B
13.5 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
Merge
8.8 A
6.7 A
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp to
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp
Basic
12.1 B
13.7 B
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp
Diverge
11.4 B
13.2 B
Oak Valley Off -Ramp to On -Ramp
Basic
10.3 B _
10.4 B
Oak Valley On -Ramp
Merge
10.4 B _
10.5 B
South of Oak Valley Parkway
Basic
12.4 B
12.5 B
Notes: 1. The LOS and density (in vehicles per lane per mile) are reported.
2. Bold font indicates LOS D conditions, bold and underline font indicate LOS E or F conditions.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document (EA OG170) Traffic Operations Analysis Report, March 2020.
Build Alternatives 3 and 4 are projected to perform similarly for Opening Year (2025) based on LOS and volume densities. As shown in Tables 1-4d and 1- 4e, all 1-10 eastbound mainline segments are projected to operate at LOS B Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 20 197
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
or better for the Opening Year (2025) Build Alternatives 3 and 4 scenarios.
The projected deficient eastbound mainline segments associated with the No - Build Alternative are projected to improve to acceptable conditions under both build alternatives.
Table 1-4d: Freeway Mainline Operations - Opening Year (2025) 1-10 Eastbound Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond) Conditions Facility Type (Mainline Segment)
Facility
Type
AM Delay
(sec/veh)
AM
LOS
PM Delay
(sec/veh)
PM
LOS
North of Singleton Road
Basic
13.6 B
15.5 B
Singleton On -Ramp
Merge
10.7 B
17.0 B
Singleton Road On -Ramp to Cherry
Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Basic
12.6 B
17.3 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Diverge
9.7 B
13.6 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp to
On -Ramp
Basic
11.2 A
13.3 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
Merge
10.2 B
11.7 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp to
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp
Basic
12.2 B
14.6 B
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp
Diverge
11.5 B
15.5 B
Oak Valley Off -Ramp to On -Ramp
Basic
10.4 B
11.1 B
Oak Valley On -Ramp
Merge
10.3 B
8.9 A
South of Oak Valley Parkway
Basic
12.4 B
12.1 B
Notes: 1. The LOS and density (in vehicles per lane per mile) are reported.
2. Bold font indicates LOS D conditions, bold and underline font indicate LOS E or F conditions.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document (EA OG170) Traffic Operations Analysis Report, March 2020.
Table 1-4e: Freeway Mainline Operations - Opening Year (2025) 1-10 Eastbound Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf) Conditions Facility Type (Mainline Segment)
Facility
Type
AM Delay
(sec/veh)
AM
LOS
PM Delay
(sec/veh)
PM
LOS
North of Singleton Road
Basic
10.7 B
15.0 B
Singleton On -Ramp
Merge
11.5 B
16.8 B
Singleton Road On -Ramp to Cherry
Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Basic
12.6 B
17.2 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Diverge
9.7 A
14.3 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp to
On -Ramp
Basic
11.2 B
13.0 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
Merge
10.2 B
11.6 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp to
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp
Basic
12.2 B
14.4 B
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp
Diverge
11.8 B
15.0 B
Oak Valley Off -Ramp to On -Ramp
Basic
10.3 B
11.0 B
Oak Valley On -Ramp
Merge
10.4 B
9.0 A
South of Oak Valley Parkway
Basic
12.3 B
12.1 B
Notes: 1. The LOS and density (in vehicles per lane per mile) are reported.
2. Bold font indicates LOS D conditions, bold and underline font indicate LOS E or F conditions.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document (EA OG170) Traffic Operations Analysis Report, March 2020.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 21 198
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
As shown in Table 1-4f, two mainline segments (Cherry Valley Boulevard on - ramp to the Singleton Road off -ramp and Singleton Road off -ramp) are projected to operate at an unacceptable LOS D for the Opening Year (2025) No -Build scenario along westbound 1-10 during the AM peak hour. All other westbound segments are projected to operate at an acceptable LOS C or better during both the AM and PM peak hours.
As shown in Tables 1-4g and 1-4h, one segment (westbound 1-10 North of Singleton Road Off -Ramp) associated with Build Alternatives 3 and 4 are projected to operate at LOS D during the AM peak hour. All other 1-10 westbound mainline segments are projected to operate at LOS C or better for the Opening Year (2025) Build Alternatives 3 and 4 scenarios for both the AM and PM peak hours. The deficient eastbound mainline segments associated with the No -Build Alternative are projected to improve to acceptable conditions under both build alternatives.
Table 1-4f: Freeway Mainline Operations — Opening Year (2025) 1-10 Westbound No -Build Conditions
Facility Type (Mainline Segment)
Facility
Type
AM Delay
(sec/veh)
AM
LOS
Delay
(sec/veh)
PM
LOS
South of Oak Valley Parkway
Basic
215
C
20.0 B
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp
Diverge
20.1 C
19.2 B
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp to
Oak Valley Parkway On -Ramp
Basic
18.1 B
16.2 B
Oak Valley Parkway On -Ramp
Merge
20.6 C
16.8 B
Oak Valley Parkway On -Ramp to
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Basic
25.3 C
20.8 C
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Diverge
25.0 C
19.0 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
to Cherry Valley Boulevard On-
Ramp
Basic
22.8 C
18.8 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
Merge
25.0 C
17.1 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
to Singleton Road Off -Ramp
Basic
28.7 D
22.3 C
Singleton Road Off -Ramp
Diverge
29.4 D
21.5 C
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
to Singleton Road Off -Ramp
Weave
--
--
--
--
North of Singleton Road
Basic
27.7 C
20.8 C
Notes: 1. The LOS and density (in vehicles per lane per mile) are reported.
2. Bold font indicates LOS D conditions, bold and underline font indicate LOS E or F conditions.
3. A lane add occurs at the on -ramp, so the segment is analyzed as a Basic segment.
4. Two dashes - indicate that the segment does not exist under that alternative.
5. A loop on -ramp from Cherry Valley Boulevard was added in Build Alternative 4. This segment is from the Westbound 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp to Westbound 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Loop On -Ramp.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document (EA 0G170) Traffic Operations Analysis Report, March 2020.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 22 199
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Table 1-4g: Freeway Mainline Operations — Opening Year (2025) 1-10 Westbound Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond) Conditions Facility Type (Mainline Segment)
Facility
Type
AM Delay
(sec/veh)
AM
LOS
PM
Delay
(sec/veh)
PM
LOS
South of Oak Valley Parkway
Basic
21.3 C
20.0 C
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp
Diverge
21.5 C
20.3 C
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp to
Oak Valley Parkway On -Ramp
Basic
18.0 B
16.3 B
Oak Valley Parkway On -Ramp
Merge
20.9 C
17.5 B
Oak Valley Parkway On -Ramp to
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Basic
27.9 C
22.4 C
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Diverge
18.8 B
13.7 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
to Cherry Valley Boulevard On-
Ramp
Basic
24.1 C
20.2 C
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
Merge
--
--
--
--
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
to Cherry Valley Boulevard Off-
Ramp
Basic
--
--
--
Singleton Road Off -Ramp
Diverge
--
--
--
--
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
to Singleton Road Off -Ramp
Weave
22.8 C
17.7 C
North of Singleton Road
Basic
29.9 D
22.0 C
Notes: 1. The LOS and density (in vehicles per lane per mile) are reported.
2. Bold font indicates LOS D conditions, bold and underline font indicate LOS E or F conditions.
3. A lane add occurs at the on -ramp, so the segment is analyzed as a Basic segment.
4. Two dashes - indicate that the segment does not exist under that alternative.
5. A loop on -ramp from Cherry Valley Boulevard was added in Build Alternative 4. This segment is from the Westbound 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp to Westbound 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Loop On -Ramp.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document (EA OG170) Traffic Operations Analysis Report, March 2020.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 23 200
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Table 1-4h: Freeway Mainline Operations — Opening Year (2025) 1-10 Westbound Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf) Conditions Facility Type (Mainline Segment)
Facility
Type
AM Delay
(sec/veh)
AM
LOS
PM
Delay
(sec/veh)
PM
LOS
South of Oak Valley Parkway
Basic
21.3 C
19.6 B
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp
Diverge
21.3 C
20.0 C
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp to
Oak Valley Parkway On -Ramp
Basic
18.0 B
16.0 B
Oak Valley Parkway On -Ramp
Merge
20.8 C
17.0 B
Oak Valley Parkway On -Ramp to
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Basic
27.6 C
21.8 C
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Diverge
17.8 B
13.3 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
to Cherry Valley Boulevard On-
Ramp
Basic
21.95 C
18.65 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
Merge
16.6 B
11.4 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
to Cherry Valley Boulevard Off-
Ramp
Basic
26.0 C
18.7 B
Singleton Road Off -Ramp
Diverge
24.9 C
18.6 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
to Singleton Road Off -Ramp
Weave
--
--
--
--
North of Singleton Road
Basic
33.4 D
23.6 C
Notes: 1. The LOS and density (in vehicles per lane per mile) are reported.
2. Bold font indicates LOS D conditions, bold and underline font indicate LOS E or F conditions.
3. A lane add occurs at the on -ramp, so the segment is analyzed as a Basic segment.
4. Two dashes - indicate that the segment does not exist under that alternative.
5. A loop on -ramp from Cherry Valley Boulevard was added in Build Alternative 4. This segment is from the Westbound 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp to Westbound 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Loop On -Ramp.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document (EA 0G170) Traffic Operations Analysis Report, March 2020.
As shown in Table 1-4i, under the Design Year (2045) No -Build scenario, one eastbound study mainline segment is projected to operate at deficient LOS D (1-10 eastbound, north of Singleton Road) and three segments are projected to operate at deficient F (Singleton on -ramp, Singleton Road on -ramp to Cherry Valley Boulevard off -ramp, and Cherry Valley Boulevard off -ramp) under the during the PM peak hour. All other mainline segments are projected operate at acceptable LOS C or better conditions during both the AM and PM peak hours.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 24 201
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Table 1-4i: Freeway Mainline Operations - Design Year (2045) 1-10 Eastbound No -Build Conditions
Facility Type (Mainline Segment)
Facility
Type
AM Delay
(sec/veh)
AM
LOS
PM Delay
(sec/veh)
PM
LOS
North of Singleton Road
Basic
15.9 B
35.0 D
Singleton Road On -Ramp
Merge
17.1 B
105.8
F
Singleton Road On -Ramp to Cherry
Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Basic
17.5 B
48.0 F
-
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Diverge
17.9 B
120.0
F
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp to
On -Ramp
Basic
17.2 B
12.2 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
Merge
11.8 B
7.9 A
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp to
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp
Basic
17.9 B
13.4 B
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp
Diverge
17.6 B
14.4 B
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp to On
Ramp
Basic
14.8 B
9.3 A
Oak Valley Parkway On -Ramp
Merge
14.0 B
7.0 A
South of Oak Valley Parkway
Basic
17.4 B
10.3 B
Notes: 1. The LOS and density (in vehicles per lane per mile) are reported.
2. Bold font indicates LOS D conditions, bold and underline font indicate LOS E or F conditions.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document (EA OG170) Traffic Operations Analysis Report, March 2020.
Table 1-4j: Freeway Mainline Operations - Design Year (2045) 1-10 Eastbound Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond) Conditions Facility Type (Mainline Segment)
Facility
Type
AM Delay
(sec/veh)
AM
LOS
PM Delay
(sec/veh)
PM
LOS
North of Singleton Road
Basic
16.3 B
29.7 D
Singleton Road On -Ramp
Merge
17.3 B
25.6 C
Singleton Road On -Ramp to Cherry
Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Basic
18.6 B
25.4 C
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Diverge
14.3 B
19.6 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp to
On -Ramp
Basic
16.9 B
18.4 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
Merge
15.0 B
17.3 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp to
Oak Valle Parkwa Off -Ram.
Basic
19.0 B
22.3 C
Oak Valle Parkwa Off -Ram.
Diverge
17.7 B
44.0 E
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp to On-
Ramp
Basic
15.4 B
15.8 B
Oak Valle Parkwa On -Ram.
Mere
14.2 B
9.7 A
South of Oak Valley Parkway
Basic
18.0 B
15.8 B
Notes: 1. The LOS and density (in vehicles per lane per mile) are reported.
2. Bold font indicates LOS D conditions, bold and underline font indicate LOS E or F conditions.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document (EA OG170) Traffic Operations Analysis Report, March 2020.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 25 202
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Table 1-4k: Freeway Mainline Operations — Design Year (2045) 1-10 Eastbound Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf) Conditions Facility Type (Mainline Segment)
Facility
Type
AM Delay
(sec/veh)
AM
LOS
PM Delay
(sec/veh)
PM
LOS
North of Singleton Road
Basic
15.4 B
26.0 C
Singleton Road On -Ramp
Merge
17.3 B
25.9 C
Singleton Road On -Ramp to Cherry
Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Basic
18.6 B
25.1 C
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Diverge
12.9 B
19.2 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp to
On -Ramp
Basic
16.9 B
18.3 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
Merge
14.9 B
17.2 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp to
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp
Basic
18.9 B
22.0 C
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp
Diverge
17.8 B
40.6 E
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp to On -
Ramp
Basic
15.4 B
15.6 B
Oak Valley Parkway On -Ramp
Merge
14.4 B
9.9 A
South of Oak Valley Parkway
Basic
18.0 B
15.8 B
Notes: 1. The LOS and density (in vehicles per lane per mile) are reported.
2. Bold font indicates LOS D conditions, bold and underline font indicate LOS E or F conditions.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document (EA OG170) Traffic Operations Analysis Report, March 2020.
Under the Design Year (2045) Build Alternatives 3 and 4 scenarios, the 1-10 eastbound study segments would operate at an acceptable LOS C or better with the exception of the 1-10 eastbound segments located north of Singleton Road, which would continue to operate at an LOS D during the PM peak hour for Build Alternative 3 only, and the diverge at Oak Valley Parkway off -ramp, which is projected to operate at LOS E during the PM peak hour under both build alternatives; refer to Tables 1-4j and 1-4k.
The build alternatives would improve the deficient eastbound mainline segments associated with No -Build Alternative (Singleton on -ramp, Singleton Road on -ramp to Cherry Valley Boulevard off -ramp, and Cherry Valley Boulevard off -ramp) from an unacceptable LOS F to an acceptable LOS C or better.
As shown in Table 1-41, under the Design Year (2045) No -Build scenario, all westbound study mainline segments are projected to operate at an unacceptable LOS D or worse with the exception of following westbound 1-10 segments: Oak Valley Parkway off -ramp (PM peak hour), Cherry Valley Boulevard off -ramp to Cherry Valley Boulevard on -ramp (AM peak hour), and 1-10 north of Singleton (PM peak hour).
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 26 203
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Table 1-41: Freeway Mainline Operations - Design Year (2045) 1-10 Westbound No -Build Conditions
Facility Type (Mainline Segment)
FTypeY
AM
Delay
(sec/veh)
SOS
PM
Delay
(sec/veh)
PM
LOS
South of Oak Valley Parkway
Basic
105.5
F
49.9 F
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp
Diverge
121.0
F
25.4 C
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp to Oak
Valley Parkway On -Ramp
Basic
100.2
F
-
71.4 F
-
Oak Valley Parkway On -Ramp
Merge
108.5
F
87.8 F
Oak Valley Parkway On -Ramp to
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Basic
94.3 F
-
56.5 F
-
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Diverge
98.5 F
96.0 F
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp to
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
Basic
27.4 C
29.7 D
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
Merge
28.8 D
29.2 D
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp to
Singleton Road Off -Ramp
Basic
32.5 D
34.5 D
Singleton Road Off -Ramp
Diverge
33.8 D
34.6 D
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp to
Singleton Road Off -Ramp
Weave
--
--
--
--
North of Singleton Road
Basic
28.5 D
26.5 C
Notes: 1. The LOS and density (in vehicles per lane per mile) are reported.
2. Bold font indicates LOS D conditions, bold and underline font indicate LOS E or F conditions.
3. A lane add occurs at the on -ramp, so the segment is analyzed as a Basic segment.
4. Two dashes - indicate that the segment does not exist under that alternative.
5. A loop on -ramp from Cherry Valley Boulevard was added in Build Alternative 4. This segment is from the Westbound 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp to Westbound 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Loop On -Ramp.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document (EA OG170) Traffic Operations Analysis Report, March 2020.
As shown in Tables 1-4m and 1-4n, under both build conditions, four of the six failed 1-10 westbound segments associated with the No -Build Alternative are projected to improve to LOS D or better (south of Oak Valley Parkway, Oak Valley Parkway off -ramp, Oak Valley Parkway off -ramp to Oak Valley Parkway on -ramp, and Oak Valley Parkway on -ramp). The 1-10 westbound at Cherry Valley Boulevard off -ramp segment would improve during the PM peak hour for both build alternatives. The 1-10 westbound at Cherry Valley Boulevard off -ramp to Cherry Valley Boulevard on -ramp, Cherry Valley Boulevard on -ramp, Cherry Valley Boulevard on -ramp to Cherry Valley Boulevard off -ramp, and Singleton off -ramp westbound segments would also improve during the PM peak hour for Build Alternative 4. The 1-10 westbound segment at Oak Valley Parkway on -ramp to Cherry Valley Boulevard off -ramp would continue to operate at a deficient LOS E or worse.
Three 1-10 westbound segments that operate acceptably under the No -Build conditions are projected to deteriorate to deficient LOS D or worse under both build alternatives (Cherry Valley Boulevard off -ramp to Cherry Valley Boulevard on -ramp during the AM peak hour, Cherry Valley Boulevard on - Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 27 204
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
ramp to Singleton off -ramp during the AM peak hour, North of Singleton during both the PM peak hour). The 1-10 westbound at Cherry Valley Boulevard on -ramp to Singleton off -ramp, Singleton off -ramp, and north of Singleton segments would continue to deteriorate during the AM peak hour with implementation of the build alternatives.
Table 1-4m: Freeway Mainline Operations — Design Year (2045) 1-10 Westbound Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond) Conditions Facility Type (Mainline Segment)
FacilitTypey
AM
Delay
(sec/veh)
LOS
PM
De I
(sec/veh)
PM
LOS
South of Oak Valley Parkway
Basic
28.9 D
27.5 C
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp
Diverge
27.9 C
27.4 C
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp to Oak
Valley Parkway On -Ramp
Basic
24.3 C
22.4 C
Oak Valley Parkway On -Ramp
Merge
21.7 C
27.5 C
Oak Valley Parkway On -Ramp to
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Basic
40.0 E
—
36.3 E
—
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Diverge
48.8 F
25.1 C
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp to
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
Basic
36.1 E
—
30.8 D
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
Merge
--
--
--
--
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp to
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Basic
--
--
--
--
Singleton Road Off -Ramp
Diverge
--
--
--
--
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp to
Singleton Road Off -Ramp
Weave
44.6 F
—
26.0 C
North of Singleton Road
Basic
72.9 F
30.5 D
Notes: 1. The LOS and density (in vehicles per lane per mile) are reported.
2. Bold font indicates LOS D conditions, bold and underline font indicate LOS E or F conditions.
3. A lane add occurs at the on -ramp, so the segment is analyzed as a Basic segment.
4. Two dashes - indicate that the segment does not exist under that alternative.
5. A loop on -ramp from Cherry Valley Boulevard was added in Build Alternative 4. This segment is from the Westbound 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp to Westbound 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Loop On -Ramp.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document (EA 0G170) Traffic Operations Analysis Report, March 2020.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 28 205
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Table 1-4n: Freeway Mainline Operations - Design Year (2045) 1-10 Westbound Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf) Conditions Facility Type (Mainline Segment)
FTypey
AM
Delay
(sec/veh)
LAOS
PM
Delay
(sec/veh)
LOSPM
South of Oak Valley Parkway
Basic
29.1 D
27.4 C
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp
Diverge
27.8 C
27.4 C
Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp to Oak
Valley Parkway On -Ramp
Basic
24.0 C
22.3 C
Oak Valley Parkway On -Ramp
Merge
22.6 C
27.5 C
Oak Valley Parkway On -Ramp to
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Basic
47.9 F
-
35.7 E
-
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Diverge
32.3 D
23.7 C
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp to
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
Basic
34.44 D
24.14 C
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp
Merge
30.4 D
19.6 B
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp to
Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp
Basic
63.8 F
-
29.2 C
Singleton Road Off -Ramp
Diverge
66.0 F
27.1 C
Cherry Valley Boulevard On -Ramp to
Singleton Road Off -Ramp
Weave
--
--
North of Singleton Road
Basic
81.8 F
32.0 D
Notes: 1. The LOS and density (in vehicles per lane per mile) are reported.
2. Bold font indicates LOS D conditions, bold and underline font indicate LOS E or F conditions.
3. A lane add occurs at the on -ramp, so the segment is analyzed as a Basic segment.
4. Two dashes - indicate that the segment does not exist under that alternative.
5. A loop on -ramp from Cherry Valley Boulevard was added in Build Alternative 4. This segment is from the Westbound 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp to Westbound 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Loop On -Ramp.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document (EA 0G170) Traffic Operations Analysis Report, March 2020.
Freeway Mainline Collision Analysis
Traffic Accident Surveillance and Analysis System - Transportation Systems Network (TASAS - TSN) data was provided by Caltrans for collisions reported on the mainline, on -ramps and off -ramps at the existing Cherry Valley Boulevard and 1-10 interchange for the three-year period between October 1, 2017 and September 30, 2020. Tables 1-5a and 1-5b, below, summarizes the Fatal and Fatal plus Injury collision rates for the Actual Collision Rates and Statewide Average Collision Rates. Table 1-6 summarizes the collision types for the interchange.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 29 206
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Table 1-5a: Collision Summary - Actual Collision Rate
Location
Post Mile
Fatal'
InFa dual,
Total'
1-10 Mainline from Singleton Road to Oak Valley
Parkway
R2.1 to
R3.8
0.000
0.21 0.75
1-10 Eastbound Off -Ramp to Cherry Valley
Boulevard
R2.867
0.000
0.13 0.38
1-10 Eastbound On -Ramp from Cherry Valley
Boulevard
R3.189
0.000
0.00 0.68
1-10 Westbound Off -Ramp to Cherry Valley
Boulevard
R3.246
0.000
0.00 0.00
I-10 Westbound On -Ramp from Cherry Valley
Boulevard
R2.896
0.000
0.12 0.25
Notes: Bold text indicates that actual collision rate is greater than statewide average collision rate.
1. Ramp collisions are per Million Vehicle (MV). Mainline collisions are per Million Vehicle Miles (MVM).
Table 1-5b: Collision Summary - Statewide Average Collision Rate Location
Post Mile
Fatal'
Injuryl '
Total'
1-10 Mainline from Singleton Road to Oak Valley
Parkway
R2.1 to
R3.8
0.004
0.28 0.87
1-10 Eastbound Off -Ramp to Cherry Valley
Boulevard
R2.867
0.008
0.39 1.03
1-10 Eastbound On -Ramp from Cherry Valley
Boulevard
R3.189
0.002
0.23 0.63
1-10 Westbound Off -Ramp to Cherry Valley
Boulevard
R3.246
0.008
0.39 1.03
1-10 Westbound On -Ramp from Cherry Valley
Boulevard
R2.896
0.002
0.23 0.63
Notes: Bold text indicates that actual collision rate is greater than statewide average collision rate.
1. Ramp collisions are per Million Vehicle (MV). Mainline collisions are per Million Vehicle Miles (MVM).
As shown in Table 1-6, collision data shows that rear end (50 percent) and side swipe (22.2 percent) are the majority of collisions along 1-10. Majority of the collisions along the eastbound off -ramp are side swipe (66.7 percent), while the eastbound on -ramp are hit object (100 percent). Majority of the collisions along the westbound on -ramp are hit object (50 percent) and overturn (50 percent), while the westbound off -ramp had no collisions recorded. No pedestrian collisions were reported under the current stop - controlled configuration according to TASAS and TIMS (Transportation Injury Mapping System) data in the past three years, from October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2020.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 30 207
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Table 1-6: Ramp Collision Types
Location
Head-
On
Side
Swipe
Rear
End
Broadside
Hit
Object
Overturn
Auto-
Pedestrian
Other
1-10 Mainline from
Singleton Road to
Oak Valley Parkway
1.2%
22.2%
50.0%
1.2%
19.8%
3.1%
0.0%
2.5%
1-10 Eastbound Off -
Ramp to Cherry
Valley Boulevard
0.0%
66.7%
0.0%
0.0%
33.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1-10 Eastbound On -
Ramp from Cherry
Valley Boulevard
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1-10 Westbound Off -
Ramp to Cherry
Valley Boulevard
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1-10 Westbound On -
Ramp from Cherry
Valley Boulevard
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
50.0 50.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Notes: 1. Represents a total of 12 ramp collisions during this time period.
Table 1-7, below, summarizes the primary collision factors for the interchange. Collision data shows that majority of the collision factors along 1- 10 are speeding (48.8 percent) and other violations (17.9 percent). Majority of the collision factors along the eastbound off -ramp (66.7 percent) and on -ramp (100 percent) are improper turns. Majority of the collisions along the westbound on -ramp are influence of alcohol (50 percent) and improper turns (50 percent), while the westbound off -ramp had no collision factors.
Table 1-7: Primary Collision Factors
Location
HBD
FTC
FTY
IT
SPD
OV
ID
OTD
UNK
FA
NS
1-10 Mainline from
Singleton Road to Oak
Valley Parkway
6.8%
1.2%
0.0%
18.5%
48.8%
17.9%
0.0%
4.9%
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
1-10 Eastbound Off -
Ramp to Cherry Valley
Boulevard
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
66.7%
0.0%
33.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1-10 Eastbound On -
Ramp from Cherry
Valley Boulevard
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1-10 Westbound Off -
Ramp to Cherry Valley
Boulevard
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1-10 Westbound On-
Ramp from Cherry
Valley Boulevard
50.0 %
0.0%
0.0%
50.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Notes: HBD = Influence of Alcohol FTC = Following Too Closely; FTY = Failure to Yield; ID = Improper Driving; IT = Improper Turn; SPD = Speeding; OV = Other Violations; NS = Not Stated; OTD = Other Than Driver; UNK = Unknown; FA = Fell Asleep Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 31 208
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Based on the available collision data and proposed project improvements, it is expected that the number and severity of collisions will decrease after the project is constructed. The proposed project would enhance safety on the mainline by adding dedicated acceleration and deceleration lanes at the Cherry Valley Boulevard westbound and eastbound on- and off -ramps and an auxiliary lane between the project limits. These lanes will provide a dedicated lane for exiting and merging vehicles, separate from the mainline through traffic. This is likely to enhance weaving maneuverability and reduce the collision frequency and severity of sideswipe and rear -end type collisions, which are primary collision types on 1-10.
Collision data shows that a high percentage of ramp incidents were sideswipe, hit object, and overturn type collisions. The proposed project is expected to reduce the frequency and severity of these collision types on the interchange ramps by re -aligning the Cherry Valley Boulevard ramps, signalizing the ramp intersections, and providing proper sight distance. The project will implement the latest Caltrans signing and striping for improved visibility.
The proposed project is expected to reduce the frequency and severity of hit object type collisions, at the interchange, by moving roadside objects outside the clear recovery area, making the objects breakable, or shielding the objects with a standard barrier in accordance with the latest Caltrans design standards.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
Within the project vicinity, sidewalk is located at the I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard overcrossing, eastbound Cherry Valley Boulevard, and along Roberts Road. There are currently no designated bicycle lanes or facilities on - site. Based on the Calimesa General Plan, bicycle lanes are planned along Cherry Valley Boulevard, south of Roberts Road, along Roberts Road, west of Cherry Valley Boulevard, and along Palmer Avenue/Desert Lawn Drive, east and west of the Cherry Valley Boulevard and Palmer Avenue/Desert Lawn Drive intersection within the project area. The Riverside County General Plan does not identify proposed bicycle or pedestrian facilities within the project area. Project implementation would improve pedestrian and bicycle movement within the area by replacing existing facilities and including additional pedestrian and bicycle facilities to promote connectivity.
Additionally, there are no anticipated bicycle or pedestrian improvement/rehabilitation projects that would occur within the project site, and the project would not impact any future bicycle/pedestrian improvement projects planned by the City or County.
Transit
According to the Riverside County General Plan, the public transit system within the County includes fixed route public transit systems (Riverside Transit Agency, SunLine Transit Agency), bus carriers (Greyhound Bus Lines), AMTRAK, Metrolink, and other local agency transit and paratransit services (carpooling, van pooling, taxi service, and dial -a -ride programs).
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 32 209
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Based on the Calimesa General Plan, Yucaipa Dial -A -Ride provides on -call transit services in portions of the City. The service is provided on a space - available basis, with priority given to Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)- certified individuals. There are no existing bus stops or turn outs within project boundaries, and none are proposed as part of the Build Alternatives.
Roadway Deficiencies
Improvements to 1-10 in the study area are critical to the operations for all modes of travel not only for regional traffic, but also for local traffic. Key deficiencies that affect traffic in the study area include the following:
• Insufficient pedestrian sidewalk widths and multi -modal facilities (no bike lanes),
• Non-standard curb ramps,
• Existing bridge structure will be over 50 years old by the project's estimated opening year (2025),
• Existing bridge structure does not include protective screening over 1-10, • Existing ramps are single lane and exceed 1,000 feet without ramp metering, • Intersection spacing is less than the preferred minimum 500 feet, • Non-standard superelevations, and
• Non-standard Midwest Guardrail Systems.
Social Demands or Economic Development
Land use development in the City of Calimesa is creating a greater demand for travel on 1-10. For this reason, local road connections and extensions are a high priority. The 1-10 corridor is part of a transportation network that accommodates all aspects of travel in the region, including commuters, shoppers, public transit patrons, trucks, and emergency personnel. 1-10 is also used as a major goods movement facility. West and east of the 1-10 within the project vicinity, large residential and retail developments are currently under construction or planned within the near future. Future development of this portion of the City is expected to result in direct and indirect population increases in the City. As growth continues on a local, Statewide, and regional basis, the need for more efficient transportation in the corridor will increase.
Modal Interrelationships and System Linkages
As discussed above, 1-10 is included in the NHS, RSIRS, STRAHNET, and STAA. The segment within the project limits is functionally classified as an Urbanized Freeway. 1-10 provides regional access in the project area, traversing the State of California in a west -east orientation. 1-10 originates in Santa Monica, California, and extends eastward to its terminus in Jacksonville, Florida. As an interstate facility, 1-10 serves as a major corridor for goods movement through the project area and areas west and east via the freeway.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 33 210
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
As noted above, large residential and retail developments are currently under construction or planned within the project area. Future development of this portion of the City is expected to result in direct and indirect population increases. The project would provide enhanced mobility and connectivity to accommodate planned development within the region.
The project would also include facilities intended to promote connectivity for system linkages related to pedestrian and bicycle movement. The project includes sidewalks and bicycle buffers along Cherry Valley Boulevard, where no such facilities currently exist. These facilities would promote connectivity for system linkages related to pedestrian and bicycle movement. Six-foot bicycle lanes would be included along Cherry Valley Boulevard, between Roberts Road and the Overcrossing as well as Calimesa Boulevard and the Overcrossing.
Air Quality Improvements
The proposed project would provide sidewalks and turn lane bicycle buffers along Cherry Valley Boulevard, where none exist today. These facilities would promote alternative modes of transportation and help to reduce air quality impacts.
Independent Utility and Logical Termini
FHWA regulations (23 Code of Federal Regulations 771.111[f]) require that the action evaluated shall:
1. Connect logical termini and be of sufficient length to address environmental matters on a broad scope.
2. Have independent utility or independent significance (i.e., be usable and be a reasonable expenditure even if no additional transportation improvements in the area are made).
3. Not restrict consideration of alternatives for other reasonably foreseeable transportation improvements.
The proposed project's termini allow for an evaluation of potential environmental effects for a project large enough to address the defined operational enhancements specifically related to the interchange area as discussed above. No subsequent transportation improvements in the area would be needed to optimize the operation of the I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange, consistent with applicable Caltrans design standards.
Accordingly, the project is considered to have independent utility.
Further, the proposed project would not restrict consideration of alternatives for other reasonably foreseeable local transportation improvements adjacent and/or in proximity to the I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 34 211
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
1.3 Project Description
The project proposes to upgrade and reconfigure the existing I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange (project) from PM R2.1 to R3.8. The I- 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange is located on 1-10 between Singleton Road and Oak Valley Parkway. The I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange is a major access point for existing and proposed residential and commercial development. The existing configuration is a diamond interchange, with stop control at the ramp termini. The on- and off -ramps at the interchange consist of one lane. Within the project area, Cherry Valley Boulevard is a two-lane roadway with a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour west of the interchange and a posted speed limit of 55 miles per hour east of the interchange. Per the City of Calimesa's General Plan, Cherry Valley Boulevard is classified as a Major Arterial. The Cherry Valley Boulevard Overcrossing (OC) (PM R3.05, Bridge Number 56-0481) is a four -span, concrete -girder bridge constructed in 1965 and is approximately 273 feet long, 47 feet wide, and crosses six lanes of traffic over 1-10.
1.4 Alternatives
1.4.1 Project Alternatives
This section describes the proposed action and the project alternatives that were developed to meet the identified purpose and need of the project. The criteria used for alternative evaluation included operational benefits, provisions for bicycle and pedestrian mobility, and environmental impacts. A No -Build Alternative and two Build Alternatives were studied for the I- 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project.
• Alternative 1 (No -Build Alternative): Refer to Figure 1-3, Alternative 1 (No - Build);
• Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond) (Preferred Alternative): Refer to Figure 1-4 (a key map), and Figures 1-4a through 1-4e, Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond); and
• Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf): Refer to Figure 1-5 (a key map), and Figures 1-5a through 1-5e, Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf).
1.4.2 Common Design Features of the Build Alternatives
Calimesa Boulevard
The Build Alternatives propose to realign Calimesa Boulevard located north of the I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange along Cherry Valley Boulevard.
Cherry Valley Boulevard
Under both Build Alternatives, Cherry Valley Boulevard would be widened to two lanes in each direction within the project limits.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 35 212
Figure 1-3: Alternative 1 (No -Build)
Source: Google Earth Pro, March, 2720
QNOT TO SCALE
01.21 JN1.11i1
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
INTERSTATE 10/CHERRY VALLEY BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT Alternative 1 (No -Build)
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 36 Figure 1-3
Item 9.
213
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Figure 1-4: Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond)
LEGEND
Project Improvements
Proposed Retaining Walls
Proposed State Right of Way
Proposed City Right of Way
Proposed Bridge Improvements
Proposed Roadway Improvements
Existing State Right of Way
Existing City Right of ,Nay
Temporary Construction Easement
0. NOT TO SCALE
INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
INTERSTATE 10/CHERRY VALLEY BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond)
072021 JN 163171
Figure 1-4
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 37 214
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
This page intentionally left blank.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 38 215
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Figure 1-4a: Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond)
INITIAL STUDYIENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENT
INTERSTATE 1 0/CHERRY VALLEY BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT O. NOT TO SCALE
Proposed City Right of LVay
Proposed Bridge Improvements
Proposed Roadway Improvements
Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond)
012021 J 1&171
Figure 1-4a
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 39 216
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
This page intentionally left blank.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 40 217
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Figure 1-4b: Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond)
INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
INTERSTATE 10/CHERRY VALLEY BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT
NOT TO SCALE
Project Improvements
Proposed Retaining Walls
Proposed State Right of ay
Proposed City Right of 'Way
Proposed Bridge Improvements
Proposed Roadway Improvements
Existing State Right of Way
Existing City Right of', ay
Temporary Construction Easement
Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond)
ON2021 JN 1E4171
Figure 1-4h
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 41 218
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
This page intentionally left blank.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 42 219
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Figure 1-4c: Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond)
INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
INTERSTATE 10/CHERRY VALLEY BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT
NOT TO SCALE
Project Improvements
Proposed Retaining Walls
Proposed State Right of Ray
Proposed City Right of Way
Proposed Bridge Improvements
Proposed Roadway Improvements
Existing State Right of 'Nay
Existing City Right of 'hay
Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond)
01.2021 JN ie ,i
Figure 1-4c
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 43 220
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
This page intentionally left blank.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 44 221
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Figure 1-4d: Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond)
IN ITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSM ENT
INTERSTATE 1O/CHERRYVALLEY BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT
01. NOT TO SCALE
Project Improvements
Proposed Retaining 'Nails
Proposed State Right of ',Nay
Proposed City Right of'A y
Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond)
01f2021 JN 169171
Figure 1-4d
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 45 222
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
This page intentionally left blank.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 46 223
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Figure 1-4e: Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond)
LEGEND
Project Improvements
Proposed Retaining Walls
Proposed State Right of VVay
Proposed City Right of VVay
Proposed Bridge Improvements
Proposed Roadway Improvements
Existing State Right of VVay
Existing City Right of VVay
Temporary Construction Easement
On NOT TO SCALE
INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
INTERSTATE 10/CHERRY VALLEY BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond)
01,2021 JN16a171
Figure 1-4e
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 47 224
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
This page intentionally left blank.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 48 225
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Figure 1-5: Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf)
'
LEGEND
Project Improvements
Proposed Retaining Walls
Proposed State Right of Jay
Proposed City Right of Way
Proposed Bridge Improvements
Proposed Roadway Improvements
Existing State Right of ',Nay
Existing City Right of 'J'Vay
Temporary Construction Easement
�ia� NOT TO SCALE
07.,2021 JN 183171
INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
INTERSTATE 10/CHERRY VALLEY BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf)
Figure 1-5
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 49 226
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
This page intentionally left blank.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 50 227
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Figure 1-5a: Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf)
INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
INTERSTATE 10/CHERRY VALLEY BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT
NOT TO SCALE
01R021 JN1e&171
Project Improvements
Proposed Retaining Walls
Proposed State Right of Way
Proposed City Right of Way
Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf)
Figure 1-5a
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 51 228
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
This page intentionally left blank.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 52 229
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Figure 1-5b: Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf)
INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
INTERSTATE 10/CHERRY VALLEY BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT
UNOT TO SCALE
O1PO21 JN169171
Project Improvements
Proposed Retaining Walls
Proposed State Right of VUay
Proposed City Right of EVay
Proposed Bridge Improvements
Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf)
Figure 1-5b
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 53 230
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
This page intentionally left blank.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 54 231
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Figure 1-5c: Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf)
INITIAL STUDYIENVIRON MENTAL ASSESSMENT
INTERSTATE 10/CHERRY VALLEY BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT /' NOT TO SCALE
Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf)
01/2021 JN 1M71
Figure 1-5c
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 55 232
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
This page intentionally left blank.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 56 233
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Figure 1-5d: Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf)
INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
INTERSTATE 1O/CHE.RRYVALLEY BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT
NOT TO SCALE
018021 JN 1E01
Proposed State Right of V'N"ay
Proposed City Right of Way
Proposed Bridge Improvements
Proposed Roadway Improvements
Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf)
Figure 1-5d
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 57 234
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
This page intentionally left blank.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 58 235
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
NOT TO SCALE
Figure 1-5e: Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf)
004
4 Y
filet
•
s _
•
LEGEND
— Project Improvements
Proposed RetainingV'Valls
+++++ Proposed State Right of Way
Proposed City Right of V'Vay
Proposed Bridge Improvements
Q Proposed Roadway Improvements
Existing State Right of VVay
- Existing City Right of V''./ay
-- Temporary Construction Easement
INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
INTERSTATE 10/CHERRY VALLEY BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf)
01,2021 JN169171
Figure 1-5e
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 59 236
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
This page intentionally left blank.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 60 237
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Right -Turn Pockets
The Build Alternatives would include right -turn pockets along Cherry Valley Boulevard approaching the westbound 1-10 on -ramp and eastbound 1-10 on - ramp.
Channelized Turning
Channelized turning would be installed on Cherry Valley Boulevard to connect to Calimesa Boulevard under both Build Alternatives.
Traffic Features
For both Build Alternatives, proposed traffic features will include new signals, traffic controller cabinets, signs, and pavement markings. A signalized stop control is proposed at Calimesa Boulevard and Cherry Valley Boulevard. The 1-10 eastbound and westbound off- and on -ramps at Cherry Valley Boulevard are proposed to be signalized.
Roadside Design Features
For both Build Alternatives, new or reconstructed roadside design features will include Maintenance Vehicle Pullouts (MVP), Midwest Guardrail Systems (MGS) and dike where applicable.
California Highway Patrol Enforcement Areas
The entry ramps in both directions will accommodate California Highway Patrol (CHP) enforcement areas under both Build Alternatives.
Ramp Termini
The exit ramps in both directions will require reconstruction of the ramp termini.
Ramp Metering
Under both Build Alternatives, ramp metering is proposed at the westbound and eastbound 1-10 on -ramps.
1-10 Auxiliary Lane
Both Build Alternatives would include an auxiliary lane added to the eastbound off -ramp and westbound on -ramp to provide additional storage.
High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes
Both Build Alternatives propose High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) preferential lanes on each of the Cherry Valley Boulevard entrance ramps.
Retaining Walls
Retaining walls would be constructed along each on- and off -ramp under both Build Alternatives.
ADA Facilities
For both Build Alternatives, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant curb ramps and crosswalks would be provided at all proposed pedestrian crossings on Cherry Valley Boulevard, where access is provided. All pedestrian crossings would be designed to the Permanent Pedestrian Facilities ADA Compliance Handbook prepared by Caltrans (dated 2018).
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 61 238
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Highway Planting
Highway planting of disturbed areas is proposed with both Build Alternatives.
Disturbed areas and slopes will be planted and irrigated for aesthetic, erosion control, and water quality purposes. Permanent Erosion Control, Irrigation, and Planting Plans will be approved by the Caltrans Landscape Architect and Maintenance representatives in coordination with project stakeholders during the final design phase of the project.
Drainage Features
Under both Build Alternatives, drainage features include new or reconstructed drainage inlets, pipes, culverts, and Best Management Practices (BMPs).
Utility Relocation
The utilities shown in Table 1-8 are anticipated to require relocation under Build Alternatives 3 and 4. Coordination with the identified utility companies will be carried out during the final design and construction phases of the project. The need for relocation of any lines will be confirmed during final design.
Table 1-8: Utility Relocation Summary
Utility
Company/Owner
Utility Type
Relocation
Southern California
Gas (SCG)
Gas — One six-inch medium
pressure line along existing
Calimesa Boulevard.
Utility will be realigned with the
realignment of Calimesa Boulevard by
approximately 1,500 linear feet relocation.
Yucaipa Valley
Water District
Sewer — One six-inch line
within State ROW outside of
westbound 1-10 shoulder.
Utility will be realigned within same
vicinity of State ROW, approximately
3,000 linear feet to avoid bridge
abutments and westbound 1-10 ramp
realignments.
Beaumont -Cherry
Valley Water
District (BCVWD)
Water — Three 24 -inch lines
(two potable and one non-
potable) to be constructed
with project.
Utility will be constructed with the project,
along Cherry Valley Boulevard.
Southern California
Edison (SCE)
Electric — Three lines; two
overhead (one line running
across and along existing
Calimesa Boulevard and a
second line running across
Cherry Valley Boulevard
south of the eastbound 1-10
ramp intersection) and one
underground transmission
line running across and along
Cherry Valley Boulevard.
The overhead utility line that runs along
and across Calimesa Boulevard will be
realigned with the realignment of
Calimesa Boulevard by approximately
1,500 linear feet relocation. The overhead
utility line that runs across Cherry Valley
Boulevard will be relocated across Cherry
Valley Boulevard by approximately 400
linear feet relocation. The underground
utility line that runs along and across
Cherry Valley Boulevard will be realigned
along Cherry Valley Boulevard by
approximately 700 linear feet relocation.
Charter
Communication — Overhead
cable line running along
existing Calimesa Boulevard.
Utility will be realigned with the
realignment of Calimesa Boulevard by
approximately 1,500 linear feet relocation.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 62 239
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Utility
Company/Owner
Utility Type
Relocation
Frontier (Verizon)
Communication —
Underground line running
along existing Calimesa
Boulevard.
Utility will be realigned with the
realignment of Calimesa Boulevard by
approximately 1,500 linear feet relocation.
Construction Phasing
Under both Build Alternatives, construction would occur in one phase and is anticipated to last approximately 24 months, or 315 working days.
Project Features
This project contains a number of standardized project measures applicable to the build alternatives, which are employed on most, if not all, Caltrans projects and were not developed in response to any specific environmental impact resulting from the proposed project. These measures are addressed in more detail in the Environmental Consequences sections found in Chapter 2.
Geotechnical Investigations
Geotechnical investigations would be required during final design of the 1-10 overcrossing and interchange improvements. Additional investigations would include the preparation of a Foundation Report, Final Materials Report and Final Geotechnical Design Report. Infiltration basins are proposed in the undeveloped areas between the on- and off -ramps and 1-10. Approximately 50 exploratory borings will be required during final design. It is anticipated that approximately 40 potholes would be required during the PS&E phase.
1.4.3 Unique Features of Build Alternatives
Build Alternative 3 (Diverging Diamond Interchange)
Interchange Configuration
Build Alternative 3 would reconstruct the current interchange into a diverging diamond interchange (DDI). This interchange configuration crosses each direction of traffic to the opposite side, optimizing left -turn movements and reducing conflict points.
Overcrossing Structure
This alternative would utilize two separate overcrossing structures for each direction of Cherry Valley Boulevard. Vehicles traveling northbound along the Cherry Valley Boulevard overcrossing would use the western overcrossing structure and vehicles traveling southbound would use the eastern overcrossing structure. Pedestrian facilities are discussed below.
On- and off -ramps
All on- and off -ramps at the interchange would be signalized, realigned, and reconstructed to multilane ramps. The westbound 1-10 on -ramp would reduce from three lanes to one lane. The eastbound on -ramp would reduce from two Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 63 240
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
lanes to one lane. Refer to Section 2.1.9 for further detail regarding queuing at the ramp locations.
The westbound off -ramp would include a right -turn pocket for vehicles turning northbound onto Cherry Valley Boulevard and two left lanes for vehicles turning southbound onto Cherry Valley Boulevard. The eastbound off -ramp would include two lanes of traffic turning northbound and two lanes of travel turning southbound onto Cherry Valley Boulevard.
Pedestrian Facilities
Build Alternative 3 provides a sidewalk on each side of Cherry Valley Boulevard, excluding the overcrossing structures where a ten -foot sidewalk would be provided on the eastbound structure to serve both directions of pedestrian travel. Crosswalks would be oriented to connect the eastbound structure's sidewalk to the sidewalk on both sides of Cherry Valley Boulevard.
Right turn pockets would include a four -foot bicycle buffer and bypass the Cherry Valley Boulevard crossovers.
Right -of -Way
For Build Alternative 3, ROW required for acquisition includes approximately
3.64 acres of Temporary Construction Easement (TCE) and approximately 4.20 acres of permanent easements; refer to Tables 1-9 and 1-10, below. No residential or business relocations would occur as a result of Build Alternative 3.
Table 1-9: Potential Temporary Right -of -Way Acquisitions and Relocations — Build Alternative 3
APN
Address
Build
Alternative 3
Impacts
(Acres)
Relocation
Current Land Use
413-270-004
N/A
0.16 No
Commercial/Vacant Land
413-270-014
3607 Cherry
Valley Boulevard
2 38
No
Commercial/Multiple SFR
Structures
413-270-015
36240 Cherry
Valley Boulevard
0.50 No
Residential/Residential
407-230-018
N/A
0.19 No
Commercial/Vacant Land
407-230-017
36015 Cherry
Valley Boulevard
0.13 No
CommercialNacant Land
407-230-016
N/A
0.06 No
Commercial/Vacant Land
413-780-018
N/A
0.05 No
Commercial/Shopping
Center
413-290-044
N/A
0.17 No
Commercial/Vacant Land
Source: Community Impact Assessment Technical Memorandum, January 2021.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 64 241
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Table 1-10: Potential Permanent Right -of -Way Acquisitions and Relocations — Build Alternative 3
APN
Address
Build
Alternative 3
Impacts (Acres)
Relocation
Current Land Use
413-270-004
N/A
0.63 No
Commercial/Vacant Land
413-270-014
3607 Cherry
Valley Boulevard
1.94 No
Commercial/Multiple SFR
Structures
413-270-015
36240 Cherry
Valley Boulevard
0.81 No
Residential/Residential
407-230-018
N/A
0.02 No
CommercialNacant Land
413-780-020
N/A
0.44 No
Commercial/Shopping Center
413-290-044
N/A
0.02 No
CommercialNacant Land
413-270-021
N/A
0.21 No
CommercialNacant Land
413-270-019
N/A
0.08 No
CommercialNacant Land
413-270-020
N/A
0.05 No
Residential/Vacant Land
Source: Community Impact Assessment Technical Memorandum, January 2021.
Table 1-11: Build Alternative 3 Cost Estimates (Escalated) Roadway
Structures
Right of Way*
Total**
$35,646,192
$10,913,298
$13,874,900
$60,432,000
*Includes utility costs per Right of Way Data Sheets
**Rounded cost per preliminary cost estimating guidance Build Alternative 4 (Partial Cloverleaf Interchange)
Interchange Configuration
Build Alternative 4 would reconstruct the current interchange into a partial cloverleaf configuration.
Overcrossing Structure
The I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard overcrossing would be reconstructed to accommodate two through lanes in each direction, channelized left -turn lanes, and sidewalks.
On- and off -ramps
The westbound loop on- and off -ramps would be realigned and reconstructed.
The proposed westbound loop on -ramp would serve eastbound vehicles on Cherry Valley Boulevard. The proposed westbound direct on -ramp and eastbound on- and off -ramps would be signalized, realigned, and widened to two-lane ramps. The westbound direct on -ramp would provide a free -flow movement for westbound vehicles on Cherry Valley Boulevard. The eastbound ramps would maintain their current tight diamond configuration.
Pedestrian Facilities
Under Build Alternative 4, Cherry Valley Boulevard would be widened to include sidewalk in the eastbound direction. The I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard overcrossing would be reconstructed to include an eight -foot sidewalk. A six - Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 65 242
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
foot bicycle buffer would be provided on all proposed right turn pockets within the project limits.
Right -of -Way
For Build Alternative 4, ROW required for acquisition includes approximately
3.19 acres of TCE and approximately 6.56 acres of Permanent Easement; refer to Tables 1-12 and 1-13, below. Two residential relocations would occur on APN 413-270-014. No business relocations would occur as a result Build Alternative 4.
Table 1-12: Potential Temporary Right -of -Way Acquisitions and Relocations — Build Alternative 4
APN
Address
Build Alternative
4 Impacts (Acres)
Relocation
Current Land Use
413-270-004
N/A
0.14 No
CommercialNacant Land
413-270-014
3607 Cherry Valley
Boulevard
2 84
No
Commercial/Multiple SFR
Structures
413-270-015
36240 Cherry Valley
Boulevard
0.11 No
Residential/Residential
407-230-018
N/A
0.08 No
CommercialNacant Land
413-290-044
N/A
0.02 No
CommercialNacant Land
Source: Community Impact Assessment Technical Memorandum, January 2021 Table 1-13: Potential Permanent Right -of -Way Acquisitions and Relocations — Build Alternative 4
APN
Address
Build Alternative
4 Impacts (Acres)
Relocation
Current Land Use
413-270-004
N/A
1.02 No
CommercialNacant Land
413-270-014
3607 Cherry Valley
Boulevard
1.31 Yes
Commercial/Multiple SFR
Structures
413-270-015
36240 Cherry Valley
Boulevard
< 0.01
No
Residential/Residential
407-230-004
--
0.01 No
CommercialNacant Land
407-230-017
36015 Cherry Valley
Boulevard
2.77 No
CommercialNacant Land
407-230-016
N/A
0.92 No
CommercialNacant Land
413-780-020
N/A
0.26 No
Commercial/Shopping
Center
413-270-021
N/A
0.21 No
CommercialNacant Land
413-270-019
N/A
0.06 No
CommercialNacant Land
413-270-020
N/A
0.01 No
Residential/Vacant Land
Source: Community Impact Assessment Technical Memorandum, January 2021 Nonstandard Features
Access Rights Opposite Ramp Terminals, HDM Index 504.8: Access rights shall be acquired on the opposite side of ramp terminals to preclude driveways or local roads within the ramp intersection. Build Alternative 4 proposes that the termini of the westbound off- and westbound loop on -ramps Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 66 243
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
join at an intersection opposite Calimesa Boulevard. This configuration introduces nonstandard access control due to the presence of Calimesa Boulevard opposite the westbound ramps. Moving Calimesa Boulevard to provide standard access control opposite the westbound ramps would introduce additional design exceptions, ROW impacts, and construction costs.
Guidelines for the Location and Design of Curb Ramps, HDM Index 105.5:
Dual curb ramps are required at each curb return with a (potential) pedestrian crossing. Single curb ramps are provided at both the eastbound and westbound ramps at various locations where additional pedestrian crossings could happen, but are not proposed. Installing dual curb ramps at these locations would encourage pedestrians to cross at unmarked crossings and, when used, would place pedestrians on the west side of the interchange where there are no sidewalks.
Cost
The escalated cost estimate for the Build Alternative is summarized in Table 1-14. Capital outlay support costs are estimated at $3,487,000 and are not included in these costs.
Table 1-14: Build Alternative 4 Cost Estimates (Escalated) Roadway
Structures
Right of Way*
Total**
$36,553,277
$8,610,049
$18,690,488
$63,854,000
*Includes utility costs per Right of Way Data Sheets
**Rounded cost per preliminary cost estimating guidance
1.4.4 Transportation Demand Management (TDM), Transportation System Management (TSM), and Mass Transit Alternatives
Transportation System Management (TSM) strategies increase the efficiency of existing facilities; they are actions that increase the number of vehicle trips a facility can carry without increasing the number of through lanes. Examples of TSM strategies include: ramp metering, auxiliary lanes, turning lanes, reversible lanes and traffic signal coordination. TSM also encourages automobile, public and private transit, ridesharing programs, and bicycle and pedestrian improvements as elements of a unified urban transportation system. Modal alternatives integrate multiple forms of transportation modes, such as pedestrian, bicycle, automobile, rail, and mass transit.
TDM focuses on regional means of reducing the number of vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled as well as increasing vehicle occupancy. It facilitates higher vehicle occupancy or reduces traffic congestion by expanding the traveler's transportation options in terms of travel method, travel time, travel route, travel costs, and the quality and convenience of the travel experience.
A typical activity would be providing funds to regional agencies that are actively promoting ridesharing, maintaining rideshare databases, and providing limited rideshare services to employers and individuals.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 67 244
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Although TSM, TDM, and mass transit measures alone could not satisfy the purpose and need of the proposed project, the following measures have been incorporated into the build alternative for this project:
• The project would provide sidewalk along Cherry Valley Boulevard and a four -foot to six-foot bicycle buffer at turn pockets. These features would improve mobility through the interchange for bicyclists and pedestrians. • The project would provide two-lane ramp metered entrances at all interchange entrance ramps. This feature would improve mobility along 1-10 within the project boundaries.
• The project would provide an auxiliary lane along 1-10 westbound between the Cherry Valley Boulevard and Singleton Road. This feature would improve mobility along 1-10 within the project boundaries.
1.4.5 Alternative 1 (No -Build Alternative)
The No -Build Alternative refers to the scenario/condition where no improvements are constructed at/through the study intersection with the exception of routine roadway maintenance and currently approved improvements.
1.4.6 Comparison of Alternatives
Table 1-15: Alternatives Comparison — Project Features and Design Standards
Evaluation
Criteria
No -Build Alternative
Build Alternative 3
Build Alternative 4
Traffic
As shown in Table 1-
As shown in Table 1-2c,
As shown in Table 1-2c,
Operations
2b, by the year 2025,
by the year 2025, all
by the year 2025, all
—
the following
analyzed intersections are
analyzed intersections are
Intersections
intersections are
projected to perform at an
projected to perform at an
projected to have a
acceptable LOS C or
acceptable LOS C or
LOS D or worse:
better.
better.
• Cherry Valley
Boulevard/ Palmer
As shown in Table 1-2f, by
the year 2045 the
As shown in Table 1-2g,
by the year 2045 the
Avenue/Desert
following intersections are
following intersections are
Lawn Drive (AM
projected to have a LOS D
projected to have a LOS D
and PM peak
or worse:
or worse:
hour)
• 1-10 eastbound
• 1-10 eastbound
• Cherry Valley
Off/On-Ramps/
Off/On-Ramps/
Boulevard/
Singleton Road
Singleton Road
Roberts Road (AM
(PM peak hour)
(PM peak hour)
and PM peak
• 1-10 westbound
• 1-10 westbound
hour)
Off/On-Ramps/
Off/On-Ramps/
• 1-10 eastbound
Singleton Road
Singleton Road
Off/On-
(AM peak hour)
(AM and PM peak
Ramps/Cherry
• Cherry Valley
hour)
Valley Boulevard
Boulevard/Roberts
• Cherry Valley
Boulevard/Roberts
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 68 245
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Evaluation
Criteria
No -Build Alternative
Build Alternative 3
Build Alternative 4
(AM and PM peak
Road (PM peak
Road (PM peak
hour)
hour)
hour)
• I-10 westbound
Off/On-Ramps/
Cherry Valley
Boulevard (AM
peak hour)
• Calimesa
Boulevard/Cherry
Valley Boulevard
(westbound
through) (AM peak
hour)
As shown in Table 1-
2e, by the year 2045
the following
intersections are
projected to have a
LOS D or worse:
• I-10 eastbound
Off/On-
Ramps/Singleton
Road (PM peak
hour)
• 1-10 westbound
Off/On-
Ramps/Singleton
Road (AM and PM
peak hour)
• Cherry Valley
Boulevard/ Palmer
Avenue/Desert
Lawn Drive (AM
and PM peak
hour)
• Cherry Valley
Boulevard/Roberts
Road (AM and PM
peak hour)
• 1-10 eastbound
Off/On-
Ramps/Cherry
Valley Boulevard
(AM and PM peak
hour)
• I-10 westbound
Off/On-
Ramps/Cherry
Valley Boulevard
(AM and PM peak
hour)
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 69 246
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Evaluation
Criteria
No -Build Alternative
Build Alternative 3
Build Alternative 4
• I-10 westbound
Off/On-
Ramps/Oak Valley
Parkway (AM
peak hour)
Traffic
As shown in Tables 1-
As shown in Tables 1-4d
As shown in Table 1-4e
Operations
4c and 1-4f, by the
and 1-4g, by the year
and 1-4h, by the year
— Mainline
year 2025, the
2025, the following
2045, the following
following mainline
locations are projected to
locations are projected to
segments are
have a LOS D or worse:
have a LOS D or worse:
projected to have a
• Westbound North of
• Westbound North of
LOS D or worse:
Singleton Road (AM
Singleton Road (AM
• Eastbound
peak hour)
peak hour)
Singleton On -
Ramp (PM peak
As shown in Tables 1-4j
As shown in Tables 1-4k
hour)
through 1-4m, by the year
through 1-4n, by the year
2045, the following
2045, the following
• Eastbound Cherry
mainline segments are
mainline segments are
Valley Boulevard
projected to have a LOS D
projected to have a LOS D
Off -Ramp (PM
or worse:
or worse:
peak hour)
• Eastbound North of
• Eastbound Oak
• Westbound
Singleton Road (PM
Valley Parkway Off -
Cherry Valley
peak hour)
Ramp (PM peak
Boulevard On-
• Eastbound Oak
hour)
Ramp to Singleton
Road Off -Ramp
Valley Parkway Off-
• Westbound South
(AM peak hour)
Ramp (PM peak
hour)
of Oak Valley
Parkway (AM peak
• Westbound
• Westbound South of
hour)
Singleton Road
Off -Ramp (AM
Oak Valley Parkway
• Westbound Oak
peak hour)
(AM peak hour)
Valley Parkway On-
• Westbound Oak
Ramp to Cherry
As shown in Tables 1-
Valley Parkway On-
Valley Boulevard
4i and 1-41, by the year
Ramp to Cherry
Off -Ramp (AM and
2045, the following
Valley Boulevard Off-
PM peak hour)
mainline segments are
Ramp (AM and PM
• Westbound Cherry
projected to have a
peak hour)
Valley Boulevard
LOS D or worse:
• Westbound Cherry
Off -Ramp (AM peak
• Eastbound North
Valley Boulevard Off-
hour)
of Singleton Road
Ramp (AM peak
• Westbound Cherry
(PM peak hour)
hour)
Valley Boulevard
• Eastbound
• Westbound Cherry
Off -Ramp to Cherry
Singleton Road
Valley Boulevard Off-
Valley Boulevard
On -Ramp (PM
Ramp to Cherry
On -Ramp (AM peak
peak hour)
Valley Boulevard On-
hour)
• Eastbound
Ramp (AM and PM
• Westbound Cherry
Singleton Road
peak hour)
Valley Boulevard
On -Ramp to
• Westbound Cherry
On -Ramp (AM peak
Cherry Valley
Valley Boulevard On-
hour)
Boulevard Off-
Ramp to Singleton
• Westbound Cherry
Ramp (PM peak
Road Off -Ramp (AM
Valley Boulevard
hour)
peak hour)
On -Ramp to Cherry
Valley Boulevard
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 70 247
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Evaluation
Criteria
No -Build Alternative
Build Alternative 3
Build Alternative 4
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Eastbound Cherry
Valley Boulevard
Off -Ramp (PM
peak hour)
Westbound South
of Oak Valley
Parkway (AM and
PM peak hour)
Westbound Oak
Valley Parkway
Off -Ramp (PM
peak hour)
Westbound Oak
Valley Parkway
Off -Ramp to Oak
Valley Parkway
On -Ramp (AM
and PM peak
hour)
Westbound Oak
Valley Parkway
On -Ramp (AM
and PM peak
hour)
Westbound Oak
Valley Parkway
On -Ramp to
Cherry Valley
Boulevard Off -
Ramp (AM and
PM peak hour)
Westbound
Cherry Valley
Boulevard Off -
Ramp (AM and
PM peak hour)
Westbound
Cherry Valley
Boulevard Off -
Ramp to Cherry
Valley Boulevard
On -Ramp (PM
peak hour)
Westbound
Cherry Valley
Boulevard On -
Ramp (AM and
PM peak hour)
Westbound
Cherry Valley
Boulevard On -
•
Westbound North of
Singleton Road (AM
and PM peak hour)
•
•
Off -Ramp (AM peak
hour)
Westbound
Singleton Road Off-
Ramp (AM peak
hour)
Westbound North of
Singleton Road (AM
and PM peak hour)
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 71 248
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Evaluation
Criteria
No -Build Alternative
Build Alternative 3
Build Alternative 4
Ramp to Singleton
Road Off -Ramp
(AM and PM peak
hour)
• Westbound
Singleton Road
Off -Ramp (AM
and PM peak
hour)
• Westbound North
of Singleton Road
(AM peak hour)
Traffic
N/A.
Compared to the No -Build
Compared to the No -Build
Operations
Alternative by the year
Alternative by the year
—System-
2025, the following
2025, the following
wide
performance measures
performance measures
Performance
would occur:
would occur:
• 75.5 seconds
decrease in average
delay per vehicle
(AM peak hour)
• 124.9 seconds
decrease in average
delay per vehicle
(PM peak hour)
• 11.4 miles per hour
(mph) increase in
average speed (AM
peak hour)
• 15.2 miles per hour
(mph) increase in
average speed (PM
peak hour)
• 219.1 hours
decrease in vehicle
hours travelled (AM
peak hour)
• 393.6 hours
decrease in vehicle
hours travelled (PM
peak hour)
Compared to the No -Build
• 78 seconds
decrease in
average delay per
vehicle (AM peak
hour)
• 121.9 seconds
decrease in
average delay per
vehicle (PM peak
hour)
• 11.3 miles per hour
(mph) increase in
average speed (AM
peak hour)
• 14.7 miles per hour
(mph) increase in
average speed (PM
peak hour)
• 203.2 hours
decrease in vehicle
hours travelled (AM
peak hour)
• 381.8 hours
decrease in vehicle
hours travelled (AM
peak hour)
Alternative by the year
2045, the following
performance measures
would occur:
• 269.7 seconds
decrease in average
Compared to the No -Build
Alternative by the year
2045, the following
performance measures
would occur:
delay per vehicle
(AM peak hour)
• 269.3 seconds
decrease in
average delay per
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 72 249
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Evaluation
Criteria
No -Build Alternative
Build Alternative 3
Build Alternative 4
• 282.2 seconds
decrease in average
delay per vehicle
(PM peak hour)
• 21.0 miles per hour
(mph) increase in
average speed (AM
peak hour)
• 21.7 miles per hour
(mph) increase in
average speed (PM
peak hour)
• 1,090.7 hours
decrease in vehicle
hours travelled (AM
peak hour)
• 1,053.4 hours
decrease in vehicle
hours travelled (PM
peak hour)
vehicle (AM peak
hour)
• 282.8 seconds
decrease in
average delay per
vehicle (PM peak
hour)
• 20.5 miles per hour
(mph) increase in
average speed (AM
peak hour)
• 21.6 miles per hour
(mph) increase in
average speed (PM
peak hour)
• 1,058.9 hours
decrease in vehicle
hours travelled (AM
peak hour)
• 1,046.6 hours
decrease in vehicle
hours travelled (PM
peak hour)
Number of
Signalized
Intersections
7 7
7 Temporary
Construction
Easements
None
7 APNs for TCEs
5 APNs for TCEs
Permanent
ROW
Acquisition
None
8 APNs
22 APNs
Total Project
Cost
None
$60,432,000
$63,854,000
Table 1-16, Environmental Impacts, provides a summary comparison of the environmental impacts between Build Alternatives 3 and 4 and the No -Build Alternative, which have been studied in conjunction with development of the proposed new interchange project. Impacts that are similar between Build Alternatives 3 and 4 are not discussed in Table 1-16. These impacts pertain to air quality, biological resources (natural communities, plant species, threatened and endangered species, and invasive species), community character, cultural resources, energy, environmental justice, hazardous waste/materials, hydrology and floodplain, land use, noise, visual/aesthetics, water quality and stormwater runoff, parks/recreation, paleontology, utilities, and Section 4(f) resources are not listed.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 73 250
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Table 1-16: Environmental Impacts
Evaluation
Criteria
No -Build
Alternative
Build Alternative 3
Build Alternative 4
Farmlands
No impact.
Project implementation of
Build Alternative 3 would
impact two properties (APN
413-270-004 and 413-270-
014) located northwest of
the I-10/Cherry Valley
Boulevard Interchange.
Project implementation
would result in the direct
conversion of approximately
11.24 acres of Farmland of
Local Importance to non-
agricultural use. With the
implementation of Measure
ROW -1, ROW will be
acquired in accordance with
the Uniform Relocation
Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Policies
Act of 1970, as amended,
and property owners shall
receive just compensation
and fair market value for
their property.
Project implementation of
Build Alternative 4 would
impact two properties (APN
413-270-004 and 413-270-
014) located northwest of
the I-10/Cherry Valley
Boulevard Interchange.
Project implementation
would result in the direct
conversion of approximately
9.44 acres of Farmland of
Local Importance to non-
agricultural use. With the
implementation of Measure
ROW -1, ROW will be
acquired in accordance with
the Uniform Relocation
Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Policies
Act of 1970, as amended,
and property owners shall
receive just compensation
and fair market value for
their property.
Relocations
and Real
Property
Acquisition
No impact.
Temporary ROW acquisition
of 3.64 acres and
permanent ROW acquisition
of 4.08 acres. No residential
or business relocations
would occur.
Temporary ROW acquisition
of 3.19 acres and
permanent ROW acquisition
of 6.50 acres. Partial
permanent of APN 413 -270 -
014 would occur, resulting in
the removal of two
residential structures. With
implementation of Measure
ROW -1, ROW will be
acquired in accordance with
the Uniform Relocation
Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Policies
Act of 1970, as amended,
and property owners will
receive just compensation
and fair market value for
their property.
Wetlands and
Other Waters
No impact.
Permanent Impacts would
occur on approximately 0.02
acre (63 linear feet) of
Regional Board jurisdiction
(non -wetland waters of the
State) and 0.03 acre (63
linear feet) of CDFW
jurisdiction. Implementation
of Measure WET -1 would
Permanent Impacts would
occur on approximately 0.06
acre (221 linear feet) of
Regional Board jurisdiction
(non -wetland waters of the
State) and 0.16 acre (221
linear feet) of CDFW
jurisdiction. Implementation
of Measure WET -1 would
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 74 251
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Evaluation
Criteria
No -Build
Alternative
Build Alternative 3
Build Alternative 4
require permits/approvals
from the United States Army
require permits/approvals
from the United States Army
Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers
(USACE), Regional Water
(USACE), Regional Water
Quality Control Board
Quality Control Board
(RWQCB), and California
(RWQCB), and California
Department of Fish and
Department of Fish and
Wildlife (CDFW).
Wildlife (CDFW).
Implementation of Measure
Implementation of Measure
WET -2 would require limits
of construction to be clearly
defined before construction
activities would begin.
WET -2 would require limits
of construction to be clearly
defined before construction
activities would begin.
Animal
No Impact.
Indirect impacts that would
Indirect impacts that would
Species
occur toward bat species
occur toward bat species
[Yuma myotis (Myotis
yumanensis), Mexican free-
tailed bat (Tadarida
brasiliensis), and big brown
bat (Eptesicus fuscus)]
would include the removal of
suitable habitat, such as
ornamental palm trees,
eucalyptus trees, the Cherry
[Yuma myotis (Myotis
yumanensis), Mexican free -
tailed bat (Tadarida
brasiliensis), and big brown
bat (Eptesicus fuscus)]
would include the removal
of suitable habitat, such as
ornamental palm trees,
eucalyptus trees, the Cherry
Valley Boulevard
Valley Boulevard
Overcrossing bridge.
Overcrossing bridge.
Implementation of measure
Implementation of measure
AS -1 would require a bat
survey is conducted prior to
commencement of project
activities.
AS -1 would require a bat
survey is conducted prior to
commencement of project
activities.
Permanent impacts would
occur to approximately 0.06
acres of suitable scrub oak
chaparral habitat for the San
Permanent impacts would
occur to approximately 0.36
acres of suitable scrub oak
chaparral habitat for the San
Diegan tiger whiptail.
Diegan tiger whiptail.
Implementation of Measure
Implementation of Measure
AS -2 would require a
qualified biological monitor
be retained on -site during
ground and habitat
disturbance activities
associated with the project.
AS -2 would require a
qualified biological monitor
be retained on -site during
ground and habitat
disturbance activities
associated with the project.
Temporary and permanent
impacts would occur to
approximately 7.11 acres
and 16.02 acres,
respectively, of suitable
habitat for the Cooper's
Temporary and permanent
impacts would occur to
approximately 8.76 acres
and 8.37 acres,
respectively, of suitable
habitat for the Cooper's
Hawk. Implementation of
Hawk. Implementation of
Measure NC -1 would
require the implementation
of a Workers Environmental
Measure NC -1 would
require the implementation
of a Workers Environmental
Awareness Program
Awareness Program
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 75 252
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
Evaluation
Criteria
No -Build
Alternative
Build Alternative 3
Build Alternative 4
(WEAP) for all contractors,
subcontractors, and workers
(WEAP) for all contractors,
subcontractors, and workers
prior to construction
prior to construction
activities.
activities.
Temporary impacts would
Temporary and permanent
occur to approximately 0.06
impacts would occur to
acres of suitable foraging
approximately 0.20 acres
and nesting habitat for
southern California rufous-
and 0.36 acres,
respectively, of suitable
crowned sparrow. Measure
foraging and nesting habitat
NC -1 would be
for southern California
implemented, and Measure
rufous -crowned sparrow.
AS -3 would require a pre-
Measure NC -1 would be
construction clearance
implemented, and Measure
survey of migratory birds.
AS -3 would require a pre -
Temporary and permanent
construction clearance
impacts would occur to
survey of migratory birds.
approximately 6.09 acres
Temporary and permanent
and 15.13 acres,
respectively, of suitable
impacts would occur to
approximately 6.97 acres
foraging and nesting habitat
for the Burrowing Owl.
and 16.12 acres,
respectively, of suitable
Measure NC -1 would be
foraging and nesting habitat
implemented, and Measure
for the Burrowing Owl.
AS -4 would require
Measure NC -1 would be
implementation of a pre-
implemented, and Measure
construction clearance
AS -4 would require a pre -
survey specifically for the
construction clearance
Burrowing Owl.
survey specifically for the
Temporary and permanent
Burrowing Owl.
impacts would occur to
Temporary and permanent
approximately 6.09 acres
impacts would occur to
and 15.13 acres,
respectively of suitable
foraging and nesting habitat
approximately 6.97 acres
and 16.12 acres,
respectively of suitable
for the California horned
foraging and nesting habitat
lark. Measures NC -1 and
for the California horned
AS -3 would be
lark. Measures NC -1 and
implemented.
AS -3 would be
Permanent impacts would
implemented.
occur towards 0.36 acres of
Temporary and permanent
suitable habitat for the
impacts would occur
northwestern San Diego
towards 0.20 acres and 0.87
pocket mouse and the San
acres, respectively suitable
Diego black -tailed
habitat for the northwestern
jackrabbit. Measure NC -1
San Diego pocket mouse
would be implemented.
and the San Diego black -
tailed jackrabbit. Measure
NC -1 would be
implemented.
After the public circulation period, all comments will be considered, Caltrans will select a preferred alternative and make the final determination of the Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 76 253
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
project's effect on the environment. Under CEQA, if no unmitigable significant adverse impacts are identified, Caltrans will prepare a Negative Declaration (ND) or Mitigated ND.
Similarly, if Caltrans, as assigned by FHWA, determines the NEPA action does not significantly impact the environment, Caltrans will issue a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
1.4.7 Identification of a Locally Preferred Alternative Build Alternative 3 was identified as the locally preferred alternative by Calimesa City Council on September 8, 2020. Although both Build Alternatives 3 and 4 would satisfy the project's purpose and need, Build Alternative 3 was selected by the Calimesa City Council for the following reasons:
• The number of permanent ROW acquisitions required for Build Alternative 3 would be less than Build Alternative 4. Accordingly, Build Alternative 3 would have less potential for permanent adverse effects.
• The total cost to construct Build Alternative 3 would be less than Build Alternative 4.
1.4.8 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Further Discussion Reversible Lanes
Assembly Bill 2542 amended California Streets and Highways code to require, effective January 1, 2017, that the Department or a regional transportation planning agency demonstrate that reversible lanes were considered when submitting a capacity -increasing project or a major street or highway lane realignment project to the California Transportation Commission for approval (California Streets and Highways Code, Section 100.015).
However, reversible lanes were not considered for the I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Improvement Project because it was programmed prior to January 1, 2017.
Alternative 2 (Roundabouts)
Build Alternative 2 (Roundabouts), from the approved Project Study Report - Project Development Support (PSR-PDS), would reconfigure the current diamond interchange and construct roundabouts at each of the existing ramp intersections. Each roundabout would include two lanes in each direction.
Cherry Valley Boulevard would be widened to two lanes in each direction with sidewalk in both directions. The I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard overcrossing would be reconstructed to accommodate these additional lanes and sidewalk.
Right turn pockets would be added on Cherry Valley Boulevard approaching each roundabout. A four -foot bicycle buffer would be provided for each of these right turn pockets. A left turn pocket would be added on Cherry Valley Boulevard to connect to Calimesa Boulevard, which would have a one-way Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 77 254
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
stop control at Calimesa Boulevard turning onto Cherry Valley Boulevard. The eastbound on -ramp and off -ramp would be realigned and reconstructed to two and three lanes, respectively. The westbound on -ramp and off -ramp would be realigned and reconstructed to three and two lanes, respectively. An auxiliary lane would be added to the eastbound off -ramp to mitigate weaving along the mainline and ramp exit. All on -ramps would be improved to include HOV preferential lanes, ramp metering, and CHP enforcement areas. This alternative is not anticipated to require FHWA approval.
Alternative 2 (Roundabouts) was removed from further consideration during the March 11, 2020 Project Development Team (PDT) meeting due to its projected insufficient traffic operations. The results of the preliminary traffic analysis indicated that Alternative 2 fails operationally on the westbound 1-10 side of the interchange due to heavy westbound on and off movements conflicting with westbound Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange traffic. As a result, this alternative is not recommended and has been eliminated from further discussion.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 78 255
Chapter 1 • Proposed Project
Item 9.
1.5 Permits and Approvals Needed
The following permits, licenses, agreements, and certifications (PLACs) are required for project construction:
Table 1-17: Permits, Licenses, Agreements and Certifications Agency
Permit/Approval
Status
California Department
of Fish and Wildlife
(CDFW)
Section 1602 Streambed
Alteration Agreement
Application for permit will be submitted to
CDFW after approval of the final
environmental document. Agreement will be
acquired prior to completion of final design.
U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE)
Section 404 Nationwide
Permit (NWP), No. 14:
Linear Transportation
Projects
Application for NWP No. 14: Linear
Transportation Projects will be submitted to
USACE after approval of the final
environmental document. Permit will be
acquired prior to completion of final design.
Santa Ana Regional
Water Quality Control
Board (SARWQCB) and
State Water Resources
Control Board (SWRCB)
401 Water Quality
Certification
Application for certification will be submitted
to SARWQCB after approval of the final
environmental document. Certificate will be
acquired prior to completion of final design.
Santa Ana Regional
Water Quality Control
Board (SARWQCB) and
State Water Resources
Control Board (SWRCB)
Section 402 NPDES
(National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination
System) (Construction
Activity)/Caltrans NPDES
Permit CAS000003 and
CAS000002 (General
Permit)
The current NPDES General Construction
Permit would be applied for prior to project
construction.
Beaumont Cherry
Valley Water District
(BCVWD)
Encroachment Permit
Will be required prior to completion of the
final design specifications.
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA)
Air Quality Conformity
Determination
FHWA's air quality conformity analysis
determination letter will be obtained prior to
approval of the final environmental
document for the project.
Freeway Maintenance
Agreement
County of Riverside and
California Department of
Transportation
Permit will be acquired prior to completion
of final design.
Note: NPDES Permit Nos. CAS000003 & CAS000002 are .ssued and CAS000002 only requires a Notice of Intent (NOI) to be submitted during construction.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 79 256
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Chapter 2
Affected Environment,
Environmental
Consequences, and
Avoidance, Minimization,
and/or Mitigation Measures
Environmental Issues With No Impacts
As part of the scoping and environmental analysis carried out for the project, the following environmental issues were considered but no adverse impacts were identified. As a result, there is no further discussion about these issues in this document.
• Coastal Zone - California's Coastal Zone generally extends 1,000 yards inland from the mean high tide line. The project area is situated in Riverside County and is not located within the Coastal Zone. Therefore, the project is not subject to the federal Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (CZMA) or to the California Coastal Act of 1976.
• Wild and Scenic Rivers - The project is not near any National Wild and Scenic Rivers.
• National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) - This project is located outside of National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) jurisdiction; therefore, an NMFS species list is not required and no effects to NMFS species are anticipated.
• Timberlands - There are no timberlands or timber harvesting uses in the project area.
2.1 Human Environment
2.1.1 Land Use
The proposed project is located in the City of Calimesa and unincorporated areas of Riverside County. The land use analysis is based predominately on information provided in the Community Impact Assessment Memorandum (CIA Memorandum) (dated January 26, 2021) prepared for the project, the City of Calimesa General Plan (General Plan) adopted in August 2014 and the County of Riverside General Plan adopted in December 2015.
Affected Environment
Existing Land Use
The Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange is located on 1-10 at Post Mile (PM)
3.5, between PM 2.1 and PM 3.8, in the City of Calimesa and in Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 80 257
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures unincorporated areas of Riverside County. The existing configuration for the I- 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange is a diamond interchange with stop control at the ramp termini. The Interchange is anticipated to be a major access point for existing residential development and planned residential and commercial uses under the Summer wind Specific Plan, within the City of Calimesa.
The I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange's existing land uses are predominately undeveloped open space and residential, with existing residences being characterized by older structures in a rural environment.
Uses within project site boundaries can be characterized as primarily transportation facilities (1-10, Cherry Valley Boulevard, Calimesa Boulevard), and undeveloped open space. Two single-family residential structures exist within the northeasterly portion of the site, north of Cherry Valley Boulevard and east of Calimesa Boulevard. Areas surrounding the project site to the north generally include open space, the Rancho Calimesa Mobile Home Park (north of Calimesa Boulevard), and a single-family residential use (north of Cherry Valley Boulevard and west of Roberts Street); a truck repair facility and open space is located to the east; the Plantation on the Lake senior community, single-family residential, commercial/retail and residential uses associated with the Summerwind Specific Plan are located to the south; and open space and rural residential uses are located to the west.
There are currently no existing community facilities within the study area (services and institutions that the local population relies on for their health and welfare and as a means to interact with other members of the community, such as schools, religious institutions and/or places of worship, medical institutions, senior centers and community centers), nor are there any existing emergency service facilities (i.e., fire or police stations).
Future Land Use
Figure 2.1.1-1, General Plan Land Use Designations, depicts the land use designations within the study area, as defined in the Calimesa General Plan and the Riverside County General Plan. Under the Calimesa General Plan, Cherry Valley Boulevard is classified as a Major Arterial within City boundaries. The Riverside County General Plan classifies 1-10 as a Major Highway and Cherry Valley Boulevard as a Collector Street within unincorporated Riverside County. Multiple land use and zoning designations are included within the study area, as shown in Table 2.1.1-1, General Plan and Specific/Community Plans Land Use Designations, below.
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 81 258
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Figure 2.1.1-1: General Plan Land Use Designations
Legend
Profrd See
Preyed SIudyAee•
lCey of Callmesa
Parcels
City or Cal !mesa General Plan Ladd Use
OP • GerAwss Park
CN • Commercial eleiglpurhend
CR - Commercial Regtona!
LI - LIgh Inehrslrlal
AL - ResIdea lIal Low
RIM • Rnipereral Low Meth!.
RR - Reslderelal Rural
Speelee Menlo., 1
Riverside County General Plan Land Use
C R - Commercial Regional
41 • Liged Ie averdy
0S -R - Open Spree Recrealbn
VLDR- Very Lew Densty Residential
Saurce ESRI. Riverside County. Cdy d Calenese
500 1.000
2.000
Feet
INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
INTERSTATE 10/CHERRY VALLEY BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT General Plan Land Use Designations
Figure 2.1.1-1
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 82 Item 9.
259
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Table 2.1.1-1: General Plan and Specific/Community Plans Land Use Designations
Interchange
Quadrant
Jurisdiction
Land Use
Zoning
Northwest
City of
Calimesa
Specific Plan Area 1 (Summerwind
Ranch Specific Plan)
Specific Plan Area 1
(SPA1)
Northeast
City of
Calimesa
Regional Commercial (CR),
Residential Low (RL), Residential
Low Medium (RLM), Residential
Rural (RR), Business Park (BP),
Light Industrial (LI)
Regional Commercial
(C -R), Residential
Low/ Medium (R -L -M)
Northeast
Riverside
County
Open Space Recreation (OS -R),
Light Industrial (LI)
Industrial Park (I -P)
Controlled Development
Area (W-2
Southeast
Riverside
County
Commercial Retail (CR), Very Low
Density Residential (VLDR)
Scenic Highway
Commercial (C -P -S)
Residential
Agricultural (R -A-1),
Industrial Park (I -P)
Southwest
City of
Calimesa
Specific Plan Area 1, Residential
Low Medium (RLM) Commercial
Neighborhood (CN)
Residential Low /
Medium (R -L -M)
Source: City of Calimesa, City of Calimesa General Plan, August 2014.
Tables 2.1.1-2, Planned Projects in the City of Calimesa and 2.1.1-3, Planned Projects in the County of Riverside provides information regarding the planned development and transportation infrastructure projects within the vicinity of the project site based on information provided by the City of Calimesa and County of Riverside; these projects are also identified in Figure
2.1.1-2, Planned City and County Projects.
According to the CIA Memorandum, the City of Calimesa has remained largely undeveloped. Based on the Calimesa General Plan, the City's vision is to transition from a small rural City into a more populous community that welcomes new residents who will live in neighborhoods located within master - planned areas, while retaining the City's sense of community. Development trends in the City include industrial, residential, and commercial facilities that would be necessary to support the City's growing population.
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 83 260
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Figure 2.1.1-2: Planned City and County Projects
Protect Slte Boundary
0 Protect Study Area
CRy of Cal{mesa Junadkctlan
Planned City and County Protect Locations
O Melestic Realty
OSteams Properly
QThe Heights et CeIimsss Specltic Plan
® Oak Veltey Town Center
O Beaumont Unified School District
® TTM 378n2 -Redman
OSummenAnd Treils - Phese 7 Leaner Tract
• Summerwlnd Commons
® San Gorgonio Crossings Project
® PM36564
0 PP25337
CUP03322
©3 PP16147
Ch.," Valiey Boulevard
4s
/\ 0 0.25 0.5
Miles
212721 JN115297
INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
INTERSTATE 10/CHERRY VALLEY BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT Planned City and County Projects
Figure 2.1.1-2
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 84 261
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Table 2.1.1-2: Planned Projects in the City of Calimesa Item 9.
Map
ID
Project Name
Project Description
Location
Status
1 Majestic Realty
Two pad proposal for
one gas station and one
drive through restaurant
California Street and
County Line Road
No approvals have been
granted.
2 Stearns
property
82 -acre industrial
development
9950 Calimesa
Boulevard
No formal application has
been submitted and no
approvals have been granted.
3 The Heights at
Calimesa
Specific Plan
High density multi -family
residential development
East of 1-10, south
of Rancho Calimesa
Mobile Home Park
No formal application has
been submitted and no
approvals have been granted.
4 Oak Valley
Town Center
Industrial/commercial
development
West of 1-10, south
of Singleton Road
A formal application has been
submitted but no approvals
have been granted.
5 Beaumont
Unified School
District
K-8 school
Within the
Summerwind Ranch
Specific Plan area
An addendum to the
Summerwind Ranch Specific
Plan EIR was approved by
school board. Currently under
construction.
6 TTM 37802 —
Reidman
179 -lot single-family
Residential subdivision
West of 1-10 and
Desert Lawn Drive
A formal application has been
submitted but no approvals
have been granted at this
time.
7 Summerwind
Trails — Phase
1 Lennar Tract
141 -unit single-family
Residential subdivision
Within the
Summerwind Ranch
Specific Plan area
Currently under construction.
8 Summerwind
Commons
75,000 square feet
commercial/retail
development
Within the
Summerwind Ranch
Specific Plan area
No approvals have been
granted.
9 San Gorgonio
Crossings
Project
229 -acre high cube
warehouse development
East of 1-10, north of
Cherry Valley
Boulevard
EIR re -opened in July 2019
per court order and Board of
Supervisors Action.
Source: Email communication with Kelly Lucia (City of Calimesa) on May 1, 2020.
Table 2.1.1-3: Planned Projects in the County of Riverside Map
ID
Project Name
Project Description
Location
Status
10 PM36564
228 -acre subdivision
East of 1-10, north of
Cherry Valley
Boulevard
Approval has been granted.
11 PP25337
230 -acre industrial
warehouse development
East of 1-10, north of
Cherry Valley
Boulevard
Approval has been granted.
12 CUP03322
Truck and equipment
garage and office
East of 1-10, south of
Cherry Valley
Boulevard
Approval has been granted.
13 PP16147
Unmanned
telecommunications
building
East of 1-10, south of
Cherry Valley
Boulevard
Approval has been granted.
Source: Email communication with Tesfu Tadesse (County of Riverside) on May 20, 2020.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 85 262
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Consistency with State, Regional, and Local Plans and Programs Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS): A Plan for Mobility, Accessibility, Sustainability, and a High Quality of Life The 2020-2045 RTP/SCS RTP/SCS provides a vision for transportation investments throughout the region. The RTP/SCS integrates transportation planning with economic development and sustainability planning and aims to comply with State greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals, such as SB 375. The SCS portion of the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS highlights strategies for the region to reach the regional target of reducing GHGs from autos and light - duty trucks by eight percent per capita by 2020, and 19 percent by 2035 (compared to 2005 levels). Specifically, these strategies are:
• Focus growth near destinations and mobility options;
• Promote diverse housing choices;
• Leverage technology innovations;
• Support implementation of sustainability policies; and • Promote a green region.
The project would align with the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS strategies as the project would relieve congestion and improve traffic operations at the 1-10/ Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange and address increased travel associated with existing and planned development anticipated in the City of Calimesa and surrounding areas. The proposed project is included in the adopted and approved 2020-2045 RTP/SCS under the listing of State Highway Projects as RTP ID RIV060116.
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program [FTIP)
The FTIP is a capital listing of all transportation projects proposed over a six - year period for the SCAG region. The projects include highway improvements, transit, rail and bus facilities, high occupancy vehicle lanes, signal synchronization, intersection improvements, freeway ramps, etc. The FTIP is prepared to implement projects and programs listed in the RTP and developed in compliance with State and federal requirements.
The proposed project is listed in SCAG's 2021 FTIP. The project entry in the 2021 FTIP is listed as Project ID RIV060116, and is described as follows:
I-10/CHERRY VALLEY BLVD IC: REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING CURVED OVERCROSSING EXTENDING 500 LINEAR FEET FROM ROBERTS ROAD (SOUTH) TO APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FT E/O CALIMESA BLVD.
ASSOCIATED PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE REALIGNMENT OF
CALIMESA BLVD AND RAMP REALIGNMENT/WIDENING FOR ALL FOUR RAMPS (CMAQ PM 2.5 BENEFITS PROJECT).
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 86 263
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan On June 17, 2003, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors adopted the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (WR-MSHCP).
The overall goal of the WR-MSHCP is to enhance and maintain biological diversity and ecosystem processes while allowing future economic growth.
The City of Calimesa is a participant in the WR-MSHCP, which means that the City has adopted a Development Mitigation Fee to assist in the funding and implementation of the WR-MSHCP. As a result, development in Calimesa follows the protocols for preservation and conservation of vegetation and wildlife identified in the WR-MSHCP. The proposed project is located within the Pass Area Plan of the WR-MSHCP. The proposed project is not specifically identified as a Covered Activity under Section 7.1 of the WR- MSHCP; however, public and private development that occurs outside of Criteria Areas and Public/Quasi-Public (P/QP) Lands is permitted under the WR-MSHCP.
Riverside County General Plan
The 2015 Riverside County General Plan elements are continuously updated.
The following policies from the most recent update of the Circulation Element (July 2020) are applicable to the proposed project.
Circulation Element Policies
• Policy C 1.6: Cooperate with and where appropriate lead local, regional, state, and federal agencies to establish an efficient circulation system. • Policy C 5.1: Encourage Caltrans to install and maintain landscaping and other mitigation elements along freeways and highways, especially when they are adjacent to existing residential or other noise sensitive uses.
City of Calimesa General Plan
The Calimesa General Plan was adopted on August 4, 2014. It serves as an official policy framework guiding physical, social, and economic development in the City, as well as the City's own operations and decisions. As identified in Section 2.1.1 and in Figure 2.1.1-1, the surrounding land uses in the study area include predominately residential and commercial uses and undeveloped open space. The following goals, policies and action items from the Calimesa General Plan Transportation and Mobility Element are applicable to the proposed project.
Transportation and Mobility Element Policies
1. Policy TM -1: Provide for roadways in accordance with the Circulation Plan.
2. Policy TM -3: Strive to construct streets in accordance with the City's standard street classifications.
a. Action Item TM -3.3: Ensure that all streets, including private streets, are constructed to a standard acceptable to the City.
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 87 264
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures
3. Policy TM -4: Maintain and rehabilitate roadways to preserve and improve the quality of City streets and thoroughfares that promote access and mobility between residential neighborhoods, employment centers, shopping, and health services.
a. Action Item TM -4.1: Following the principles of "complete streets," maximize visibility and access for pedestrians and encourage the removal of barriers (walls, easements, and fences) for safe and convenient movement of pedestrians. Ensure that the entire travel way is included in the design from building facade to building facade.
4. Policy TM -5: Design each roadway with sufficient width to accommodate projected traffic at acceptable service levels, based on the intensity or density of planned land uses.
5. Policy TM -10: Support the development of the Short- and Long -Range Transit Plans.
a. Action Item TM -10.2: Implement freeway ramp/arterial roadway interchange improvements that promote the safe and efficient movement of vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists.
b. Action Item TM -10.3: Coordinate the planning for Calimesa's transportation needs with adjacent jurisdictions, the County of Riverside, Caltrans, and public transit providers.
Environmental Consequences
No -Build Alternative
Under the No -Build Alternative, the I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange and nearby roadway facilities would remain in their existing condition. No impacts regarding existing and future land uses would occur with implementation of the No -Build Alternative since no land use changes would occur with this alternative. However, the No -Build Alternative would not be consistent with the Calimesa General Plan, nor would it be consistent with the applicable State, regional, and local plans and programs outlined above.
Additionally, the No -Build Alternative would not accomplish the purpose and need of the project.
Build Alternatives 3 and 4
Under both Build Alternatives 3 and 4, the project would result in permanent land use impacts since the acquisition of portions of vacant parcels along Cherry Valley Boulevard would be required. This would include the acquisition and the conversion of existing land uses to transportation uses. The conversion of these vacant uses to a roadway use would not trigger a new land use requiring an amendment to the Calimesa General Plan Land Use Element.
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 88 265
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Under Build Alternative 3, no residential or business relocations would occur, and under Build Alternative 4, two residential relocations would occur, and no business relocations would occur, as a result of the realignment of Calimesa Boulevard. Figure TM -1, Circulation Map, in the Transportation and Mobility Element of the Calimesa General Plan shows the City's existing and intended future roadway network, which includes the Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange. A determination of the project's consistency with goals and policies included in the applicable State, regional, and local plans and programs outlined above is provided in Table 2.1.1-4 below. As shown in Table 2.1.1-4, Build Alternatives 3 and 4 would be consistent with all applicable State, regional, and local plans and programs. As such, the project would be consistent with both the City and County General Plans and an adverse effect would not occur with implementation of the project.
Table 2.1.1-4: Consistency with State, Regional, and Local Plans and Programs
Policy
No -Build Alternative
Build Alternatives 3 and 4
Southern California
Association of Governments
(SCAG) 2020-2045 Regional
Transportation
Plan/Sustainable
Communities Strategy
(RTP/SCS)
Not Consistent. The project
is included in SCAG's 2020-
2045
RTP/SCS as RTP ID
RIV060116. As such,
implementation of the No-
Build Alternative would not
be consistent with the 2020-
2045 RTP/SCS since the
transportation
improvements that would be
provided by the project
would not be constructed
under the No -Build
Alternative.
Consistent. The project is
included in SCAG's 2020-
2045 RTP/SCS as Project
ID RIV060116. As such,
implementation of Build
Alternatives 3 and 4 would
be consistent with the 2020 -
2045 RTP/SCS since the
Transportation
improvements that would be
provided by the project
would be constructed under
Build Alternatives 3 and 4.
Southern California
Association of Governments
(SCAG) 2021 Federal
Transportation Improvement
Program (FTIP)
Not Consistent. The project
is included in SCAG's 2021
FTIP as RTP ID RIV060116.
As such, implementation of
the No -Build Alternative
would not be consistent with
the 2021 FTIP since the
transportation
improvements that would be
provided by the project
would not be constructed
under the No -Build
Alternative.
Consistent. The project is
included in SCAG's 2021
FTIP as Project ID
RIV060116. As such,
implementation of the
Alternative 3 or Alternative 4
would be consistent with the
2021 FTIP since the
transportation
improvements that would be
provided by the project
would be constructed under
the project.
Western County Multiple
Species Habitat
Conservation Plan
Consistent. Since no
development or construction
activity would occur under
the No -Build Alternative, no
conflicts with the WR-
MSHCP would occur.
Consistent. The proposed
project is permitted under
the WR-MSHCP and was
found to be consistent with
the policies of the WR-
MSHCP as part of the
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 89 266
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Policy
No -Build Alternative
Build Alternatives 3 and 4
biological resources studies
conducted for the project.
Riverside County General
Plan Circulation Element
Policy C1.6: Cooperate with
and where appropriate lead
local, regional, state, and
federal agencies to establish
an efficient circulation
system.
Consistent. Although the
No -Build Alternative would
not implement roadway
facilities improving
circulation efficiency at the
project site, it would not
preclude the City from
cooperating with local,
regional, state, and federal
agencies on projects at
other locations. Therefore,
this alternative is consistent
with Policy C1.6.
Consistent. Implementation
of the Build Alternatives
would involve coordination
with Caltrans, the County of
Riverside, the City of
Calimesa, and the Riverside
Transit Agency. The
roadway improvements
proposed by the Build
Alternatives would promote
the efficient movement of
vehicles, pedestrians, and
cyclists, thus contributing to
an efficient circulation
system in the project area.
Therefore, the Build
Alternatives are consistent
with Policy C1.6.
Riverside County General
Plan Circulation Element
Policy C 5.1: Encourage
Caltrans to install and
maintain landscaping and
other mitigation elements
along freeways and
highways, especially when
they are adjacent to existing
residential or other noise
sensitive uses.
Consistent. Although no
new roadway improvements
would be implemented
under the No -Build
Alternative including
landscaping and other
mitigation elements, it would
not preclude the City from
coordinating with Caltrans
on projects at other
locations. Therefore, this
alternative is consistent with
Policy C 5.1.
Consistent. Coordination
with Caltrans regarding the
installation and
maintenance of landscaping
and other mitigation
elements along 1-10 in the
project area would occur
under the Build Alternatives.
Therefore, the Build
Alternatives are consistent
with Policy C5.1.
Calimesa General Plan
Transportation and Mobility
Element
Policy TM -1: Provide for
roadways in accordance
with the Circulation Plan.
Not Consistent. The No-
Build Alternative would not
be consistent with Policy
TM -1. Within the study area,
Cherry Valley Boulevard is
identified as a Major Arterial
(minimum two lanes in each
direction) by the Calimesa
Circulation Plan. It is
currently a two lane
roadway (one lane in each
direction). Since the No-
Build Alternative would not
improve Cherry Valley
Boulevard be consistent
with the City's Circulation
Plan, it would not be
consistent with Policy TM -1.
Consistent. The I-10/Cherry
Valley Interchange is
included as a transportation
facility on the City of
Calimesa's 2014 General
Plan Circulation Map. The
Build
Alternatives propose to
improve Cherry Valley
Boulevard consistent with
the City's standard for a
Major Arterial. As such, the
Build Alternatives would be
consistent with Policy TM -1.
Calimesa General Plan
Transportation and Mobility
Element
Not Consistent. The No-
Build Alternative would not
be consistent with Policy
TM -3. Within the study area,
Consistent. The project
includes the realignment of
Calimesa Boulevard within
the project limits and the
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 90 267
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Policy
No -Build Alternative
Build Alternatives 3 and 4
Policy TM -3: Strive to
construct streets in
accordance with the City's
standard street
classifications.
Action Item TM -3.3: Ensure
that all streets, including
private streets, are
constructed to a standard
acceptable to the City.
Policy TM -3: Strive to
construct streets in
accordance with the City's
standard street
classifications.
Cherry Valley Boulevard is
identified as a Major Arterial
(minimum two lanes in each
direction) by the Calimesa
Circulation Plan. It is
currently a two-lane
roadway (one lane in each
direction). Since the No-
Build Alternative would not
improve Cherry Valley
Boulevard be consistent
with the City's Circulation
Plan and standards, it would
not be consistent with Policy
TM -3.
widening of Cherry Valley
Boulevard within the project
limits, which is identified as
Major Arterial by the
Calimesa Circulation Plan.
The Build Alternatives would
construct these
improvements in accordance
with design specifications for
major arterial roadways as
provided in Table TM -A of
the Calimesa 2014 General
Plan Transportation and
Mobility Element. As such,
these improvements would
be consistent with Policy
TM -3 and Action Item TM -
3.3. Calimesa General Plan
Transportation and Mobility
Element
Policy TM -4: Maintain and
rehabilitate roadways to
preserve and improve the
quality of city streets and
thoroughfares that promote
access and mobility between
residential neighborhoods,
employment centers,
shopping, and health
services.
Action Item TM -4.1:
Following the principles of
"complete streets," maximize
visibility and access for
pedestrians and encourage
the removal of barriers
(walls, easements, and
fences) for safe and
convenient movement of
pedestrians. Ensure that the
entire travel way is included
in the design from building
facade to building facade.
Not Consistent. No new
streetscape elements or
visibility/access
improvements would be
implemented under the No-
Build Alternative, and
Calimesa Boulevard and
Cherry Valley Boulevard
would retain their existing
character within the study
area. This alternative would
not relieve congestion or
address anticipated traffic
volumes due to
development in the project
area. Therefore, this
alternative would not be
consistent with Policy TM -4
or Action Item TM -4.1.
Consistent. The Build
Alternatives would
implement streetscape
elements and
visibility/access
improvements in order to
create a more uniform
approach on roadways
throughout the City, as
envisioned by the Calimesa
General Plan. Therefore,
the Build Alternatives would
be consistent with Policy
TM -4 or Action Item TM -4.1.
Calimesa General Plan
Transportation and Mobility
Element
Policy TM -5: Design each
roadway with sufficient width
to accommodate projected
traffic at acceptable service
levels, based on the
intensity or density of
planned land uses.
Not Consistent. The No-
Build Alternative would not
implement roadway
improvements such as the
widening of Cherry Valley
Boulevard, that would serve
to accommodate project
traffic at acceptable service
levels, nor would this
alternative relieve
congestion or improve traffic
Consistent. The purpose of
the project is to address
increased travel associated
with newly constructed and
planned development in the
City of Calimesa and
surrounding areas. As such,
the improvements
associated with the Build
Alternatives would serve to
accommodate projected
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 91 268
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Policy
No -Build Alternative
Build Alternatives 3 and 4
operations. Future traffic
traffic at acceptable service
conditions would worsen
levels and would therefore
under this alternative;
be consistent with Policy
therefore, this alternative is
not consistent with Policy
TM -5.
TM -5.
Calimesa General Plan
Not Consistent. The No-
Consistent. Implementation
Transportation and Mobility
Build Alternative would not
of the Build Alternatives
Element
implement roadway, ramp,
would involve coordination
Policy TM -10: Support the
arterial, or interchange
with Caltrans, the County of
development of the Short-
improvements in the study
Riverside, the City of
and Long -Range Transit
area that promote the
Calimesa, and public transit
Plans.
efficient movement of
providers. The roadway
Action Item TM -10.2:
vehicles, pedestrians, and
improvements proposed by
Implement freeway
cyclists, as envisioned in the
the Build Alternatives would
ramp/arterial roadway
City of Calimesa General
promote the efficient
interchange improvements
that promote the safe and
efficient movement of
Plan Transportation and
Mobility Element. Therefore,
this alternative is
movement of vehicles,
pedestrians, and cyclists
through the implementation
vehicles, pedestrians, and
inconsistent with Policy TM-
of ramp, arterial, and
cyclists.
10, Action Item TM -10.2 and
interchange improvements.
Action Item TM -10.3:
Action Item TM -10.3.
Therefore, the Build
Coordinate the planning for
Alternatives are consistent
Calimesa's transportation
with Policy TM -10, Action
needs with adjacent
Item TM -10.2 and Action
jurisdictions, the County of
Item TM -10.3.
Riverside, Caltrans, and
public transit providers.
Source: Michael Baker International, Community Impact Assessment Memorandum, January 2021).
Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures
No measures are proposed.
2.1.2 Parks and Recreational Facilities
Regulatory Setting
The Park Preservation Act (California Public Resources Code [PRC] Sections 5400-5409) prohibits local and state agencies from acquiring any property which is in use as a public park at the time of acquisition unless the acquiring agency pays sufficient compensation or land, or both, to enable the operator of the park to replace the park land and any park facilities on that land.
Affected Environment
This section is based upon information provided in Appendix A of this IS/EA, Resources Evaluated Relative to the Requirements of Section 4(f): No -Use Determination.
There are a range of recreational facilities located within the Section 4(f) study area (i.e., within 0.5 -mile of the project site), including parks, trails, Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 92 269
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures bicycle routes, a golf course, and recreational facilities at the Plantation by the Lake mobile home community. However, a number of these facilities do not qualify as Section 4(f) resources and the provisions of Section 4(f) do not apply. These facilities include:
• Trails within the City of Calimesa:
- Osborne Spine Trail;
- Box Canyon Trail;
- Posey's Road;
- Beef Canyon;
- Hobo's Loop;
- Brown Ridge;
- Roberts Street;
- Existing trail within SCE easement;
• Planned Class II bicycle facilities along Roberts Road and Palmer Avenue; • Recreational facilities at Plantation by the Lake; and • Morongo Golf Club at Tukwet Canyon.
The eight trails within the City of Calimesa and the Morongo Golf Club at Tukwet Canyon are located on private property. The planned Class 11 bicycle facilities along Roberts Road and Palmer Avenue are on -street facilities that share the roadway with vehicles. They are considered transportation facilities and are not anticipated to have a primary function that supports recreation. As such, it has been determined that these facilities do not meet the definition of a Section 4(f) resource, and they are not discussed further within this section.
See Appendix A for additional details related to these facilities.
The following parks and recreational facilities are located within 0.5 -mile of the project site, and are considered Section 4(f) properties:
• Singleton/Bryant Connector Trail: Based on the City of Calimesa's CommunityView GIS website, the Singleton/Bryant Connector trail is located approximately 0.3 -mile northeast of the project site. Within the project area, the trail is generally a dirt/gravel shoulder, with the exception of sidewalk provided along the northern side of the I-10/Singleton interchange. The trail begins approximately 355 feet west of the eastbound 1-10 on -ramp along Singleton Road and continues east until turning southeast along Beckwith Avenue or continuing northeast along Singleton Road. The Singleton/Bryant Connector Trail is publicly -owned and open to the public. • PASEO Trails: The PASEO trails are asphalt/concrete residential trail connectors. Based on the City of Calimesa's CommunityView GIS website, the PASEO trails are located within the western portion of the project site, Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 93 270
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures approximately 0.15 -mile west of the 1-10 along Roberts Road, Cherry Valley Boulevard, and Palmer Avenue. The PASEO Trails are publicly -owned and open to the public.
• Trevino Park: Trevino Park and associated parking lot are located approximately 0.25 -mile southwest of the project site at 11286 Tukwet Canyon Parkway, Beaumont. Based on the City of Beaumont website ( http://beaumontca.gov/facilities/facility/details/Trevino-Park-18) , Trevino Park amenities include a baseball diamond, playground equipment, two basketball courts, picnic benches, barbeques, and a grass field. Sidewalk occurs along the outer boundary and bisects the central portion of the park.
The parking lot provides 38 parking spots and three Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) parking spots. The facility is owned and operated by the City of Beaumont and is open to the public.
Environmental Consequences
No -Build Alternative
No temporary, permanent, and/or indirect impacts on the aforementioned parks/recreational facilities would occur with implementation of the No -Build Alternative, since no construction activity or land use changes would occur with this alternative.
Build Alternatives 3 and 4
The Build Alternatives would not acquire public parkland for non -parkland use; therefore, the California Public Park Preservation Act of 1971 would not apply.
As noted above, there were three parks/recreational facilities identified within
0.5 -mile of the project site, that are considered Section 4(f) properties.
Potential impacts to these facilities as a result of the Build Alternatives is provided below.
Singleton/Bryant Connector Trail
The Build Alternative's facilities and construction activities would not encroach onto the trail facility. Thus, there would be no permanent incorporation or temporary occupancy of the trail as a result of the Build Alternatives.
In addition, the Build Alternatives would have minimal adverse constructive use effects (i.e., "proximity" impacts), that would substantially impair the activities, features, and/or attributes that qualify this facility for protection under Section 4(f). This conclusion is based on the following:
• Access: The Singleton/Bryant Connector Trail can be accessed via multiple roadways surrounding the facility (Woodhouse Road/Roberts Road, Singleton Road, 1-10, Calimesa Boulevard, etc.). The Build Alternatives would not include any temporary or permanent improvements or activities that would have the capacity to alter or impede access to the trail facility with implementation of a Transportation Management Plan (TMP). Access to this Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 94 271
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures facility would be maintained throughout the duration of construction, and the TMP would be implemented during the Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) phase. The Caltrans TMP Guidelines identify the processes, roles, and responsibilities for preparing and implementing TMPs, as well as useful strategies for reducing congestion and managing work zone circulation and access. One of the primary objectives of the TMP is to maintain safe movement and access for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists through the construction zone.
• Visual/Aesthetics: The Build Alternatives would not include any features that would be tall enough to be visible from the trail, or that would substantively alter views from the trail given the existing rolling topography. Additionally, the houses and mature trees that surround portions of the trail do not allow views towards the I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange. Thus, the Build Alternatives would not result in adverse proximity effects to the Singleton/Bryant Connector Trail.
• Water Quality: The Build Alternatives would not have the potential to adversely affect water quality at the trail facility. No storm water drainage or runoff from the project site would encroach or enter onto the trail, and adverse proximity impacts would not occur under the Build Alternatives. • Air Quality: As noted in Section 2.2.6, Air Quality, of this IS/EA, the Build Alternatives would have minimal adverse effects on surrounding uses related to short-term construction or long-term operational pollutant emissions, upon adherence to Caltrans' Standard Specifications intended to reduce equipment emissions and fugitive dust. Thus, the Build Alternatives would not have adverse proximity effects related to air quality on the Singleton/Bryant Connector trail.
• Noise: As described in Section 2.2.7, Noise, of this IS/EA, the Build Alternatives would have minimal adverse effects on surrounding uses related to short-term construction or long-term operational noise, upon adherence to Caltrans' Standard Specifications and abatement measures.
Additionally, intervening structures, rolling terrain, and mature trees would serve as a buffer between trail users and the project site. Thus, the Build Alternatives would have minimal proximity effects related to noise on the Singleton/Bryant Connector Trail.
• Biological Environment: Within the project area, the Singleton/Bryant Connector Trail is primarily dirt/gravel with sidewalk along the I-10/Singleton interchange overcrossing. The trail appears to be maintained. Given the lack of natural habitat and level of human activity/disturbance on a daily basis, it is not anticipated that any sensitive natural communities or species exist.
However, there would be no project construction within or immediately adjacent to the trail, and no disturbance of any vegetation associated with the trail would occur. In addition, as noted above, the Build Alternatives are not expected to result in adverse effects related to air quality or noise, that Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 95 272
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures could otherwise result in proximity effects to biological resources at the facility.
The property is a Section 4(f) property, but no "use" will occur. Therefore, the provisions of Section 4(f) do not apply, and no adverse effects would occur in this regard.
PASEO Trails
The Build Alternative's facilities and construction activities would not encroach onto the PASEO Trail facilities. Thus, there would be no permanent incorporation or temporary occupancy of the trails as a result of the proposed Build Alternatives.
In addition, the Build Alternatives would have minimal adverse constructive use effects that would substantially impair the activities, features, and/or attributes that qualify these facilities for protection under Section 4(f). This conclusion is based on the following:
• Access: The PASEO Trails can be accessed via multiple roadways surrounding the facility (Cherry Valley Boulevard, Palmer Avenue, Desert Lawn Drive, Roberts Road, etc.). The Build Alternatives would not include any temporary or permanent improvements or activities that would have the capacity to alter or impede access to the trail facility with implementation of a TMP. A TMP would be implemented that would maintain safe movement and access for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists through the construction zone.
• Visual/Aesthetics: The Build Alternatives would not include any features that would be tall enough to be visible from the trail, or that would substantively alter views from the trail given the existing rolling topography. Additionally, the residential uses currently under construction that surround portions of the trail facilities will further impede views towards the I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange. Thus, the Build Alternatives would not result in adverse proximity effects to the PASEO Trails.
• Water Quality: The Build Alternatives would not have the potential to adversely affect water quality at the trail facilities. No storm water drainage or runoff from the project site would encroach or enter onto the PASEO Trails, and adverse proximity impacts would not occur under the Build Alternatives.
• Air Quality: As noted in Section 2.2.6, Air Quality, of this IS/EA, the Build Alternatives would have minimal adverse effects on surrounding uses related to short-term construction or long-term operational pollutant emissions, upon adherence to Caltrans' Standard Specifications intended to reduce equipment emissions and fugitive dust. Thus, the Build Alternatives would have minimal proximity effects related to air quality on the PASEO Trails.
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 96 273
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures • Noise: As described in Section 2.2.7, Noise, of this IS/EA, the Build Alternatives would have minimal adverse effects on surrounding uses related to short-term construction or long-term operational noise, upon adherence to Caltrans' Standard Specifications and abatement measures.
Additionally, intervening structures would serve as a buffer between trail users and the project site. Thus, the Build Alternatives would have minimal proximity effects related to noise on the PASEO Trails. • Biological Environment: The PASEO Trails are asphalt/concrete residential trail connectors. Given the lack of natural habitat and level of human activity/disturbance on a daily basis, it is not anticipated that any sensitive natural communities or species exist. No disturbance of any vegetation associated with the trail would occur. In addition, as noted above, the Build Alternatives are not expected to result in adverse effects related to air quality or noise, that could otherwise result in proximity effects to biological resources at the PASEO Trails.
The property is a Section 4(f) property, but no "use" will occur. Therefore, the provisions of Section 4(f) do not apply, and no adverse effects would occur in this regard.
Trevino Park
The Build Alternative's facilities and construction activities would not encroach into Trevino Park. Thus, there would be no permanent incorporation or temporary occupancy of the park as a result of the proposed Build Alternatives.
In addition, the Build Alternatives would have minimal adverse constructive use effects that would substantially impair the activities, features, and/or attributes that qualify this facility for protection under Section 4(f). This conclusion is based on the following:
• Access: Trevino Park and the associated parking lot can be accessed via multiple roadways surrounding the facility (Desert Lawn Drive, Palmer Avenue, and Champions Drive all connect to Cherry Valley Boulevard). The Build Alternatives would not include any temporary or permanent improvements or activities that would have the capacity to alter or impede access to the park or affect parking associated with the facility with implementation of a TMP. A TMP would be implemented that would maintain safe movement and access for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists through the construction zone.
• Visual/Aesthetics: The Build Alternatives would not include any features that would be tall enough to be visible from the park, or that would substantively alter views from the park given the rolling topography and intervening structures. Between the park and the project site, residential properties are currently being developed. Additionally, the current topography of the land does not afford views of the I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange. Thus, Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 97 274
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures the Build Alternatives would not result in adverse proximity effects to Trevino Park.
• Water Quality: The Build Alternatives would not have the potential to adversely affect water quality at the park. No storm water drainage or runoff from the project site would encroach or enter Trevino Park, and adverse proximity impacts would not occur under the Build Alternatives. • Air Quality: As noted in Section 2.2.6, Air Quality, of this IS/EA, the Build Alternatives would have minimal adverse effects on surrounding uses related to short-term construction or long-term operational pollutant emissions, upon adherence to Caltrans' Standard Specifications intended to reduce equipment emissions and fugitive dust. Thus, the Build Alternatives would have minimal proximity effects related to air quality on Trevino Park. • Noise: As described in Section 2.2.7, Noise, of this IS/EA, the Build Alternatives would have minimal adverse effects on surrounding uses related to short-term construction or long-term operational noise, upon adherence to Caltrans' Standard Specifications and abatement measures.
Additionally, intervening structures and rolling topography would serve as a buffer between park users and the project site. Thus, the Build Alternatives would have minimal proximity effects related to noise on Trevino Park. • Biological Environment: Trevino Park is routinely maintained, and on -site vegetation consists primarily of turf and ornamental landscaping. Given the lack of natural habitat and level of human activity/disturbance on a daily basis, it is not anticipated that any sensitive natural communities or species exist. However, there would be no project construction within or immediately adjacent to the park, and no disturbance of any vegetation associated with the park would occur. In addition, as noted above, the Build Alternatives are not expected to result in adverse effects related to air quality or noise, that could otherwise result in proximity effects to biological resources at the facility.
The property is a Section 4(f) property, but no "use" will occur. Therefore, the provisions of Section 4(f) do not apply, and no adverse effects would occur in this regard.
Based on the analysis provided above, the Build Alternatives would not result in any temporary or permanent adverse effects on parks and recreational facilities.
Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures
No measures are proposed.
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 98 275
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures
2.1.3 Farmlands
Regulatory Setting
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA, 7 United States Code [USC] 4201-4209; and its regulations, 7 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Part 658) require federal agencies, such as the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), to coordinate with the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) if their activities may irreversibly convert farmland (directly or indirectly) to nonagricultural use.
For purposes of the FPPA, farmland includes prime farmland, unique farmland, and land of statewide or local importance.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the review of projects that would convert Williamson Act contract land to non-agricultural uses. The main purposes of the Williamson Act are to preserve agricultural land and to encourage open space preservation and efficient urban growth.
The Williamson Act provides incentives to landowners through reduced property taxes to discourage the early conversion of agricultural and open space lands to other uses.
Affected Environment
This section is based on the Community Impact Assessment (CIA) (dated September 2020) that was prepared for the proposed project.
The California Department of Conservation, Office of Land Conservation maintains a statewide inventory of farmlands. These lands are mapped by the Division of Land Resource Protection (DLRP) as part of the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP). For the purposes of this analysis, farmland includes lands identified by the State of California Department of Conservation as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, and Farmland of Local Importance, as well as those properties encumbered by a Williamson Act preserve contract.
The land that is adjacent to the project within the northwestern, northeastern, and southeastern quadrants of the project's interchange currently exists as either rural residential, commercial, or undeveloped/vacant land. The California Department of Conservation DLRP designates portions of the project site as "Farmland of Local Importance". Specifically, approximately
13.5 acres located on APNs 413-270-004 and 413-270-014 have been designated as "Farmland of Local Importance"; refer to Figure 2.1.3-1, Important Farmland Map. According to the CIA, none of the designated farmlands are currently under cultivation and, based on historic aerial imagery, the project site has not been farmed within the last 10 years. The project site does not have any substantial on -farm investments including barns, drainage, and irrigation. The site lacks substantial investments such as field terraces or fruit trees/vines.
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 99 276
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Figure 2.1.3-1: Important Farmland Map
VA Build Alternative 3 Farmland of Local Importance (11.02 Acres) Build Alternative 4 Farmland of Local Importance (922 Acres) 0 0 250 500 1,000
Feet
INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
INTERSTATE 10/CHERRY VALLEY BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT Important Farmland Map
0112021 5 issrrm
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 100 Figure 2.1.3.1
Item 9.
277
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures The California Department of Conservation has determined that there are no Williamson Act contracts within the project area and none of these farmlands are currently committed to future development.
Environmental Consequences
Temporary Impacts
No -Build Alternative
Since there would be no physical construction of the interchange occurring under this alternative, there would be no physical impacts to the environment.
There would be no conversion of farmland, thus, no temporary impacts would occur under this alternative.
Build Alternatives 3 and 4
Potential impacts to farmland associated with construction of the project are considered permanent. Refer to Permanent Impacts, for discussion regarding farmlands.
Permanent Impacts
No -Build Alternative
There would be no permanent impacts under the No -Build Alternative since no farmland conversion would occur.
Build Alternatives 3 and 4
The project is subject to FPPA, 7 USC 4201-4209; and its regulations, 7 CFR Part 658). The FPPA requires Federal agencies to "...coordinate with the NRCS to examine the effects of farmland conversion..." before approving any activity that would convert farmland. In order to determine permanent farmland impacts in the study area, per the FPPA, a Farmland Conversion Impact Rating Form (Form AD -1006) was completed for the Build Alternatives and is provided in Appendix G of this IS/EA.
As shown in Table 2.1.3-1, Farmland Conversion by Alternative, Build Alternative 3 would result in approximately 11.02 acres of direct farmland impacts and approximately 0.22 acres of indirect farmland impacts (due to the interference with land patterns). This would total to approximately 11.24 acres of farmland conversion to non-agricultural uses. Build Alternative 4 would result in approximately 9.22 acres of direct farmland impacts and approximately 0.22 acres of indirect farmland impacts (due to the interference with land patterns). This would total to approximately 9.44 acres of farmland conversion to non-agricultural uses. Both Build Alternatives 3 and 4 rated the same combined score of 134 and 135 points, respectively, on the land evaluation and site assessment section of the Form AD -1006. When the total points equal or exceed 160, it is expected that alternative actions be considered that could reduce adverse impacts. Because the farmland conversion impact rating for both Build Alternatives is well below the 160 - point threshold, the Build Alternatives would not result in adverse effects to farmlands.
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 101 278
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures In addition, according to the CIA, Riverside County contains 419,835 acres of important farmland, meaning that the proposed project comprises a nominal total of 0.003 percent of important farmland in Riverside County. Accordingly, Measure ROW -1, which has been incorporated into the project and provides property owners with just compensation and fair market value for their property, is considered appropriate to address the project's acquisition of agricultural land for non-agricultural use.
Table 2.1.3-1: Farmland Conversion by Alternative
Item 9.
Alternatives
Total
Farmland
Affected
(acres)
Prime
and
Unique
Farmland
(acres)
Farmland
of Local
Importance
(acres)
Direct
Impact
(acres)
Indirect
Impact
(acres)
% of
Farmland
in
County
Farmland
Conversion
Impact
Rating
Build
Alternative 3
11.24 8.0
1.2 11.02
0.22 0.003%
134
Build
Alternative 4
9.44 8.4
0.6 9.22
0.22 0.003%
135
Source: Michael Baker International, Community Impact Assessment Memorandum, January 2021.
Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures
Refer to Measure ROW -1 in Section 2.1.6, Relocations and Real Property Acquisition.
2.1.4 Growth
Regulatory Setting
The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations, which established the steps necessary to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, require evaluation of the potential environmental effects of all proposed federal activities and programs. This provision includes a requirement to examine indirect effects, which may occur in areas beyond the immediate influence of a proposed action and at some time in the future. The CEQ regulations (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 1508.8) refer to these consequences as indirect impacts. Indirect impacts may include changes in land use, economic vitality, and population density, which are all elements of growth.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) also requires the analysis of a project's potential to induce growth. The CEQA guidelines (Section 15126.2[d]) require that environmental documents "...discuss the ways in which the proposed project could foster economic or population growth, or the construction of additional housing, either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment..."
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 102 279
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Methodology
In order to determine the level of potential influence that a transportation project may have on an area's growth and development, Caltrans has developed a guidance document for this purpose: Guidance for Preparers of Growth -Related, Indirect Impact Analyses (2006). The guidance adopts a two-phase approach to the evaluation of growth -related impacts.
The first phase, called the "first -cut screening", is designed to assist in the assessment of whether there is potential for growth -related impacts, and whether further analysis is necessary by addressing the following:
• How, if at all, does the project potentially change accessibility? • How, if at all, do the project type, project location, and growth -pressure potentially influence growth? Some transportation projects may have very little influence on future growth, while others may have a great influence.
Some geographic locations are more conducive to influencing growth, while others are highly constrained. These differences may result from physical constraints, planning and zoning factors, or local political considerations. • Determine whether project -related growth is "reasonably foreseeable" as defined by NEPA. Under NEPA, indirect impacts need only be evaluated if they are reasonably foreseeable as opposed to remote and speculative. • If there is project -related growth, how, if at all, will that affect resources of concern?
Figure 2.1.4-1, Analysis Considerations Related to Determining Potential for Project -Related Growth, helps illustrate the relationship between project type, location and growth pressure, and the potential for project -related growth. If the first -cut screening results in a determination that further analysis is required regarding growth, additional analysis steps must be followed, as described in Chapter 6 of the Guidance for Preparers of Growth -related, Indirect Impact Analyses (Guidance) (May 2006).
How, if at all, does the project potentially change accessibility? The project includes construction of improvements at the existing I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange. Although the improvements would be implemented along existing roadway facilities, the improvements would increase local roadway capacity along Cherry Valley Boulevard and provide enhanced connections to 1-10 and would subsequently also result in improved accessibility. However, no new roadways, and thus, no new access would result with project implementation. Construction of the project would not result in long-term changes to travel times, travel cost, or accessibility to employment and services in the project vicinity. In addition, no vacant lands that are currently inaccessible would become permanently accessible and therefore more likely to be developed following construction of the project.
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 103 280
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Workforce requirements associated with the construction of the project are expected to result in an influx of workers to the local area. However, the workforce influx would be temporary in nature and would cease upon completion of project construction.
Figure 2.1.4-1: Analysis Considerations of Determining Potential for Project -Related Growth
Analysis Level Project Type
Project Location
Growth Pressure
Further analysis
is not likely
Typical CE -type
activity (project on
an existing facility
and does not
increase capacity or
accessibility).
Urban: Typically low due to
built -out urban setting and
the costs associated with
redevelopment.
Rural: Typically low,
particularly in areas that are
remote from job and
population centers and
have experienced low
levels of economic activity.
• Highly restrictive land use
controls.
• Lack of infrastructure 4111
support growth.
• High vacancy rates.
• Low consumer demand.
Further analysis
may be
warranted
Further analysis
is dearly required
Capacity -increasing
or new/expanded
smogs improvements
on an existing facility_
New facility on new
alignment providing
new access.
Suburban. Potential for infill
development and
redevel op me nt/densification
of low density areas
Urban/Suburban Fringe:
Available undeveloped
parcels near expanding
urban or suburban areas
are prime arewth areas
• Moderate consumer
demand.
• Moderate vacancy rates.
• Presence of infrastructure
to support growth.
• High consumer demon
• Low vacancy rates.
• Limited land use controls.
YES
Source: California Department of Transportation, Guidance for Preparers of Growth -related, Indirect Impact Analyses (May 2006), p. 5-8, Figure 5-2.
Although the project would improve traffic operations at the interchange area, the project would not create new opportunities for access to areas that are not already afforded access under the existing conditions at the interchange; therefore, while traffic operations at the interchange would be improved with implementation of the project, the project would not substantially change accessibility to adjacent and nearby properties.
How, if at all, does the project type, project location, and growth pressure potentially influence growth?
The project type is the upgrade of an existing interchange to improve operations and mobility. Since the project would construct improvements along existing facilities (e.g., 1-10 and Cherry Valley Boulevard), subsequently Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 104 281
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures enhancing access (but not resulting in new access), the project type is considered to be one that has a low potential to influence growth.
Growth pressure within the project area is considered high when accounting for existing and planned development. The Marketplace at Calimesa was recently constructed and became operational (south of 1-10 and east of Cherry Valley Boulevard), and substantial additional residential, commercial/industrial, and institutional development is proposed within the Summerwind Specific Plan to the south of 1-10, and west of Cherry Valley Boulevard.
While growth pressure is high, the project is on an existing interstate facility near existing roadways, providing access to existing and already planned development. The project has been designed to accommodate current and projected increases in traffic volumes expected as a result of previously implemented and planned development in the area; therefore, project -related growth is not anticipated as a result of the project.
Is project -related growth reasonably foreseeable as defined by the National Environmental Policy Act?
As discussed above, the project is not anticipated to result in substantial changes in accessibility or growth. The proposed project would not influence growth because the project would not directly result in substantial changes to land use or directly encourage changes in population density. Development within the project area is governed by the Calimesa General Plan and Riverside County General Plan. Although the project would provide operational improvements to local access, it is not expected that the project would affect growth at the local or regional level. Therefore, project -related growth is not reasonably foreseeable as defined by NEPA.
If there is project -related growth, how, if at all, will that affect resources of concern?
As discussed above, the proposed project would not accelerate or otherwise influence growth beyond what is already planned in the project area. No further analysis related to growth is required for the proposed project.
2.1.5 Community Character and Cohesion
Regulatory Setting
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, established that the federal government use all practicable means to ensure for all Americans safe, healthful, productive, and aesthetically and culturally pleasing surroundings (42 United States Code [USC] 4331[b][2]). The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) in its implementation of NEPA (23 USC 109[h]) directs that final decisions on projects are to be made in the best overall public interest. This requires taking into account adverse environmental impacts, such as destruction or disruption of human -made resources, community cohesion, and the availability of public facilities and services.
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 105 282
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an economic or social change by itself is not to be considered a significant effect on the environment.
However, if a social or economic change is related to a physical change, then social or economic change may be considered in determining whether the physical change is significant. Since this project would result in physical change to the environment, it is appropriate to consider changes to community character and cohesion in assessing the significance of the project's effects.
Affected Environment
This section is based primarily on the Community Impact Assessment (CIA) Memorandum prepared for the proposed project, dated January 26, 2021.
Community character is generally reflected by multiple demographic factors such as age, ethnicity, race, income, employment, household size, and population growth trends that are found within the study area. The CIA Memorandum study area boundaries include a total of approximately 1.25 square miles surrounding the project alignment, and is generally bounded by Singleton Road and Beckwirth Avenue to the north; the open space area beginning approximately 0.5 -mile east of the I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange running south along the eastern boundary of an existing mobile home park to the east; Brookside Avenue to the south; and the open space area bordering planned residential and commercial development in the Summerwind Ranch Specific Plan area to the west, roughly adjacent to the future alignment of Roberts Road. 1-10 bisects the study area in a northwest - southeast orientation.
The following presented data provides a snapshot of residents living in the community and helps in developing a community profile, ensuring that the affected environment can be correctly described as it relates to communities and neighborhoods. A community profile is provided in this subsection, including a description of the populations residing within the study area and the existing housing stock within the study area.
General Demographics
Information from the U.S. Census Bureau was used to identify the demographic characteristics of the populations within the study area. Two census tracts were selected to be analyzed because their boundaries most closely align with the CIA Memorandum study area boundaries. It should be noted that some of the area in these census tracts is located outside of the study area boundaries. The total population within both tracts is 5,150 residents; refer to Figure 2.1.5-1, Study Area Census Tract Boundaries. The census tracts and population of each tract include Census Tract 438.11 (population 4,242) and Census Tract 438.14 (population 908).
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 106 283
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Figure 2.1.5-1: Study Area Census Tract Boundaries
Legend
Project Site
Project Study Area
Census Tracts
Study Area Census Tracts
Some: E9I Rberade C,Uy
I if NOT Ta SCALE
OY2PIi Al 169111
Gorden Air W'+'tlr�.W❑r
c„rCowl.
Nb.epe
0.341 Club
F no. Jr
INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
INTERSTATE 10/CHERRYVALLEY BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT Study Area Census Tract Boundaries
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 107 Figure 2.1.5-1
Item 9.
284
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Generally, the portion of the study area north of 1-10 (Census Tract 438.11) is located in a sparsely populated, rural area within the limits of the City of Calimesa, whereas the portion of the study area south of 1-10 (Census Tract 438.14) is located within a more densely populated area that has cohesive existing and planned residential neighborhoods in newer housing developments (i.e., The Plantation on the Lake 55+ community as well as future planned residences associated with the Summerwind Specific Plan).
As shown in Exhibit 4, CIA Study Area, of the CIA, there are no existing community facilities within a one -mile radius of the project alignment (services and institutions that the local population relies on for their health and welfare and as a means to interact with other members of the community, such as schools, religious institutions and/or places of worship, medical institutions, parks, senior centers and community centers), nor are there any existing emergency service facilities (e.g., fire or police stations) within a one -mile radius of the project alignment.
Table 2.1.5-1, Regional, Local, and Study Area Demographics, provides the general demographic information for the existing population within the study area census tracts, the City of Calimesa, and County of Riverside. As shown in Table 2.1.5-1, there is some variance in the figures between the study area census tracts, the City of Calimesa, and the County of Riverside. The census tracts have a higher median age than both the City of Calimesa and County of Riverside, with the median age in Census Tract 438.14 (69.9 years) being nearly double that of the County of Riverside (35.3 years).
Table 2.1.5-1: Regional, Local, and Study Area Demographics Demographics
Census
Tract 438.11
Census
Tract 438.14
City of
Calimesa
County of
Riverside
Total Population (# of persons)
4,242
908
8,651
2,383,286
Average Household Size (# of
persons)
2.96 1.94
2.59 3.27
Median Age (years)
52.8 69.9
47.6 35.3
Median Household Income
(dollars)
$60,372
$46,615
$53,366
$63,948
Low Income (%)
7.3 6.6
5.9 11.3
Notes: The "Low Income" category identifies the percentage of families below poverty level.
Source: Michael Baker International, Community Impact Assessment Memorandum, January 2021.
Project implementation would benefit these residents by reducing traffic congestion in the project area, providing alternative modes of transportation on -site with the addition of sidewalk and bike lanes, and reducing air quality impacts. The project also accommodates the future planned growth within the City of Calimesa.
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 108 285
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Ethnic and Racial Composition
Table 2.1.5-2, Ethnic and Racial Composition identifies ethnic characteristics of the existing population within the study area census tracts, the City of Calimesa, and the County of Riverside. As shown in Table 2.1.5-2, the study area census tracts have a similar ethnic and racial distribution to the City of Calimesa. However, the study area census tracts represent a dissimilar ethnic and racial distribution when compared to the County of Riverside overall. In particular, the percentage of persons identifying as Hispanic or Latino in both census tracts, at 23.1 and 20.6 percent, respectively, is less than half that of the County of Riverside at 48.4 percent.
Table 2.1.5-2 identifies ethnic characteristics of the existing population within the study area block groups, the City, and the County. As shown in Table 2.1.5- 2, the study area census tract has a similar ethnic and racial distribution to the regional City and County distribution for most categories. However, the percentage of persons identifying as Hispanic or Latino in Census Tract 102.01 represents a somewhat dissimilar distribution when compared to the City and County. Specifically, the Hispanic/Latino percentage in Census Tract 102.01 is 4 percent less than the City and approximately half that of the County.
Table 2.1.5-2: Ethnic and Racial Composition
Composition
Census
Tract
438.11
Census
Tract
438.14
City of
Calimesa
County of
Riverside
White Alone
81.7%
93.2%
84.0%
60.8%
Black or African American Alone
3.2%
2.1%
1.2%
6.4%
American Indian/Alaska Native
Alone
0.6%
0.0%
0.7%
0.8%
Asian Alone
3.8%
2.8%
2.1%
6.4%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific
Islander Alone
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Some Other Race Alone
7.9%
2.0%
6.4%
20.8%
Two or More Races
2.8%
0.0%
5.5%
4.5%
Hispanic or Latino (any race)
23.1%
20.6%
29.3%
48.4%
Source: Michael Baker International, Community Impact Assessment Memorandum, January 2021.
Housing
The Calimesa General Plan Housing Element, adopted in October 2013, addresses identified the needs and outlines strategies to improve the quality of living environments in Calimesa; the planning period for the Housing Element is October 15, 2013, to October 15, 2021. The Calimesa General Plan Housing Element Background Report, adopted August 4, 2014, contains a discussion of the City's housing stock characteristics, jobs -to -housing ratios, median housing unit values, and tenure and vacancy rates, discussed below.
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 109 286
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Housing Stock
According to the Housing Element Background Report, as of 2012, the majority of housing units in Calimesa were single-family detached homes and mobile homes. Approximately 63 percent of the City's housing stock was single-family homes, 35 percent were mobile homes, and two percent were multi -family units. Most new units (approximately 86 percent) added between 2000 and 2012 were single-family detached. The remaining 14 percent of housing units added between 2000 and 2012 included attached single-family homes and an increase in the number of mobile homes. The City's stock of multi -family units declined in the same period, decreasing from 121 units in 2000 to 52 units in 2012. There are no public housing projects in the City.
Per Housing Element of the Riverside County General Plan, the majority of housing units (approximately 69 percent) in the County are single-family detached homes. Approximately 23 percent of the County's housing stock were mobile homes, and a total of 4 percent multifamily homes. The remaining 4 percent of housing units consists of attached single-family homes.
The City tracks the number and types of housing constructed each year to ensure the City achieves the goals stipulated in the Regional Housing Allocation Plan (RHNA). According to the Calimesa General Plan Annual Progress Report (January 2018 -December 2018), a total of 86 single-family building permits were issued during the 2018 calendar year (the most recent year for which this data is available). The number of dwellings to be provided by the City of Calimesa for the years 2013 - 2021 is 2,341 dwellings, in the following categories:
• Very Low Income: 543
• Low Income: 383
• Moderate Income: 433
• Above Moderate: 982
Approximately 57 percent of the City's housing units were built before 1980.
The housing structures in Calimesa are generally older than the housing stock in Riverside County overall, where only 35 percent of the housing stock was built prior to 1980. The majority of the City's housing (66 percent) was constructed in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. The older units are primarily located near the City center and on scattered large lots. Newer units are generally located in the vicinity of the Calimesa Country Club and on estate lots in Oak Hills or elsewhere on the east side of the City.
Calimesa conducted a citywide survey of housing conditions in 2004. The survey consisted of an exterior visual examination and a rating of the condition of major building components for each housing unit. The survey found the majority of the City's housing stock to be in good condition. Of the Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 110 287
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures 3,313 units surveyed, 2,937 (89 percent) were determined to be sound and 360 (11 percent) were determined to be in need of some form of rehabilitation. A total of 16 units were determined to be dilapidated, which indicates that the rehabilitation of these units is financially infeasible, and they are candidates for demolition. In response to the survey results and interest from the community, the City initiated a housing rehabilitation program in 2005 and has since rehabilitated a total of 44 housing units using funding from a combination of sources including Community Development Block Grants, HOME Investment Partnerships Program, and Redevelopment Agency Low/Moderate Income Housing (LMI) funds.
Jobs -to -Housing Ratio
In its 2021-2035 RTP/SCS Growth Forecast, SCAG estimated that there were approximately 1,900 jobs in Calimesa in 2008, projecting that number to increase by 46 percent to 2,800 jobs by 2020. By comparison, SCAG expects the City's housing stock to increase from approximately 3,300 units to 6,300 units, or almost double, over this same period. SCAG's projections indicate that Calimesa currently provides and would continue to provide housing somewhat in excess of local jobs. The ratio of jobs to housing would likely change as planned commercial development gradually occurs in Calimesa.
Median Housing Unit Values
The median housing unit value in the City of Calimesa, based on the U.S.
Census Bureau's most recent American Community Survey (2018), is $203,800. According to the Calimesa General Plan Housing Element, home prices in Calimesa are among the most affordable in Riverside County.
Additionally, the City of Calimesa has a large senior population. The median age is well above the State and regional median and a smaller average household size, and the special housing needs of this population would continue to be an important planning consideration. Comparatively, the median housing unit value in Riverside County, based on the U.S. Census Bureau's most recent American Community Survey (2018), is $475,900.
Tenure and Vacancy Rates
Housing in Calimesa is primarily owner -occupied. Based on the U.S. Census Bureau's most recent American Community Survey (2018), 83.2 percent of units were owner -occupied, up from 81.4 percent in 2010. The vacancy rate is an indicator of housing supply and demand. Low vacancy rates can result in increasing housing prices. A five to six percent vacancy rate is generally considered healthy. The vacancy rate in Calimesa was 10.7 percent as of 2018, up from 9.3 percent in 2010. The vacancy rate indicates a more than adequate supply of available housing in the City.
Similar to the City of Calimesa, housing in Riverside County is primarily owner -occupied. 92.1 percent of units in the County were owner -occupied, while 7.9 percent were vacant -housing units. The vacancy rate in Riverside Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 111 288
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures County is 3.5 percent, indicating a comparatively low supply of available housing in the County as a whole.
Poverty/Low-Income Population Characteristics
For the purposes of this discussion, the poverty threshold according to the U.S. Census Bureau was used to determine the percentages of families living below the poverty line. According to the Census Bureau, the poverty threshold for a family of four (including two adults and two children) was $25,962 in 2019 (the most recent year for which this data is available).' Low income is defined based on the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) poverty guidelines. According to the DHHS 2019 Poverty Guidelines, the poverty threshold for a family of four in the State of California is $25,750.2 There is a nominal difference of $176 between the Census Bureau and DHHS poverty thresholds.
Table 2.1.5-3, Regional, Local, and Study Area Income and Poverty Levels shows the percentage of families living below the poverty level (low income) within each census tract, as well as the City of Calimesa and Riverside County. As shown, the percentage of families below the poverty line within both census tracts and the City of Calimesa are consistent, ranging from 5.9 percent to 7.3 percent. The percentage of families below the poverty line within the County is 11.3 percent, which is nearly double that of the City of Calimesa. However, the variance of the number of families living below the poverty level within the study area is not considered to be substantial.
Table 2.1.5-3: Regional, Local, and Project Area Income and Poverty Levels Low -Income Population
Census
Tract 438.11
Census
Tract 438.14
City of
Calimesa
Riverside
County
Total Population
4,242
908
8,651
2,383,286
Median Household Income
$60,372
$46,615
$53,366
$63,948
Families living below the poverty level
7.3%
6.6%
5.9%
11.3%
Notes: The Census Bureau uses a set of money income thresholds that vary by family size and composition to determine who is in poverty. If a family's total income is less than the family's threshold, then that family and every individual in it is considered in poverty. The official poverty thresholds do not vary geographically, but they are updated for inflation using the Consumer Price Index (CPI -U). The official poverty definition uses money income before taxes and does not include capital gains or noncash benefits (such as public housing, Medicaid, and food stamps).
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5 -year estimates at https://data.census.gov/cedsci/accessed 4-30-20.
1 U.S. Census Bureau website, accessed 9-17-19. https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time- series/demo/income-poverty/historical-poverty-thresholds.html. 2 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) website, accessed 9-17-19. https://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty-guidelines .
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 112 289
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Environmental Consequences
Temporary Impacts
No -Build Alternative
Since no construction or improvements would occur under the No -Build Alternative, there would be no temporary direct or indirect adverse effects related to community character or cohesion under this alternative.
Build Alternatives 3 and 4
As noted above, there are no existing community facilities within the study area (services and institutions that the local population relies on for their health and welfare and as a means to interact with other members of the community, such as schools, religious institutions and/or places of worship, medical institutions, parks, senior centers and community centers), nor are there any existing emergency service facilities (e.g., fire or police stations) within the study area. Thus, no temporary adverse effects related to community facilities would occur that could result in impacts to community character or cohesion.
Project construction activities under Build Alternatives 3 and 4 would result in temporary impacts to roadways within and surrounding the project site, that are typical of a roadway construction zone. Although these impacts would affect those traveling in the community on an intermittent basis during construction, access to the neighborhoods within the study area would be maintained throughout the duration of construction. Additionally, Measure TT - 1 would require a Transportation Management Plan (TMP) to be prepared and implemented during the Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) phase of the project. The Caltrans TMP Guidelines identify the processes, roles, and responsibilities for preparing and implementing TMPs, as well as useful strategies for reducing congestion and managing work zone traffic impacts. The primary objective of the TMP is to maintain safe movement for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists through the construction zone, as well as minimize traffic delays during the construction period.
Public transit within the project area consists of two regional express service lines operated by the City of Beaumont that connect to the City of Calimesa:
Commuter Link 120 and Commuter Link 125. Both service lines travel through the project site, along 1-10. As noted above, although construction activities may result in temporary impacts to roadways within and surrounding the site, impacts to public transit facilities would be minimized through implementation of a TMP. Thus, temporary impacts in this regard would not be adverse.
Permanent Impacts
No -Build Alternative
There would be no permanent impacts related to community character and cohesion under the No -Build Alternative since no physical changes to the existing environment would occur.
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 113 290
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Build Alternatives 3 and 4
As noted above, there are no existing community facilities within the study area. Thus, no permanent adverse effects related to community facilities would occur that could result in impacts to community character or cohesion.
As noted above, the City of Beaumont operates two regional express bus lines that connect to the City Calimesa. The Build Alternatives would improve traffic flow and relieve congestion within and surrounding the project site over the long-term. Thus, Build Alternatives 3 and 4 would provide an operational benefit with regard to public transit.
The Build Alternatives would not result in impacts with regard to community character or cohesion. Build Alternatives 3 and 4 would not involve the implementation of new housing on a direct or indirect basis that could cause an increase in population or change in community composition. The Build Alternatives would not directly or indirectly have an adverse impact on population characteristics, housing mixture, economic conditions, or supporting community services within the study area. Any potential changes to the communities that comprise the study area would result from planned County and City growth and would occur regardless of implementation of the Build Alternatives.
Adverse effects related to community cohesion would not occur since 1-10, Cherry Valley Boulevard, and other affected local roadways are existing facilities; the Build Alternatives would not result in any new roadways or physical barriers that divide or impede cohesion. The improvements associated with the Build Alternatives would reduce existing and projected future traffic congestion associated with the I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange and improve mobility and connectivity within the project area. The Build Alternatives would not divide neighborhoods, directly encourage or discourage growth, create negative changes to existing quality of life, or increase urbanization or isolation. The Build Alternatives would not impede access to community facilities, since none exist within the study area. Therefore, no long-term direct or indirect adverse effects on community character or cohesion would occur with the implementation of the Build Alternatives.
Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures
No measures are proposed.
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 114 291
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures
2.1.6 Relocations and Real Property Acquisition
Regulatory Setting
The Department's Relocation Assistance Program (RAP) is based on the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended (Uniform Act), and Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 24. The purpose of the RAP is to ensure that persons displaced as a result of a transportation project are treated fairly, consistently, and equitably so that such persons will not suffer disproportionate injuries as a result of projects designed for the benefit of the public as a whole. Please see Appendix C for a summary of the RAP.
All relocation services and benefits are administered without regard to race, color, national origin, persons with disabilities, religion, age, or sex. Please see Appendix B for a copy of the Department's Title VI Policy Statement.
Affected Environment
This section is based on the Community Impact Assessment (CIA) Memorandum dated December 3, 2020 and the September 2020 Draft Relocation Impact Memorandum (DRIM) that were prepared for the project.
Uses within project site boundaries can be characterized as predominately transportation facilities (1-10, Cherry Valley Boulevard, Calimesa Boulevard), and undeveloped open space. Two single-family residential structures exist within the northeasterly portion of the site, north of Cherry Valley Boulevard and east of Calimesa Boulevard. Areas surrounding the project site to the north generally include open space, the Rancho Calimesa Mobile Home Park (north of Calimesa Boulevard), and a single-family residential use (north of Cherry Valley Boulevard and west of Roberts Street); a truck repair facility and open space is located to the east; the Plantation on the Lake senior community, single-family residential, commercial/retail and residential uses associated with the Summerwind Specific Plan are located to the south; and open space and rural residential uses are located to the west.
Environmental Consequences
Temporary Impacts
No -Build Alternative
The No -Build Alternative would not result in any temporary adverse effects regarding relocations or real property acquisition since no construction would occur and no properties would be affected.
Build Alternatives 3 and 4
Based on the CIA Memorandum prepared for the project, it is expected that Temporary Construction Easements (TCE) would be required for both Build Alternatives. According to the CIA, the construction phase for both Build Alternatives would occur in one phase and is expected to last approximately 24 months. Table 2.1.6-1, Potential Temporary ROW Acquisitions indicates Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 115 292
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures the potential temporary ROW acquisitions that may occur under the Build Alternatives. A total of 3.64 acres for Build Alternative 3 and a total of 3.19 acres for Build Alternative 4 would be temporarily acquired during project construction. Refer to Figure 2.1.6-1, Build Alternative 3 Potential ROW Acquisition Map and Figure 2.1.6-2, Build Alternative 4 Potential ROW Acquisition Map, for a depiction of ROW acquisition associated with both Build Alternatives. Access to these properties would be maintained. Because these would be temporary and the portions of the parcels required during construction would be restored and returned to their owners following construction, adverse effects would not occur in this regard.
Permanent Impacts
No -Build Alternative
The No -Build Alternative would not result in any permanent adverse effects regarding relocations or real property acquisition since no improvements would occur.
Build Alternatives 3 and 4
Permanent acquisition would occur under both Build Alternatives. A total of 4.08 acres for Build Alternative 3 and a total of 6.50 acres for Build Alternative 4 would be permanently acquired during project construction. Table 2.1.6-2, Potential Permanent ROW Acquisitions and Relocations, below shows the potential permanent ROW acquisitions that may occur under the Build Alternatives.
Based on the DRIM prepared for the project, there are multiple existing structures associated with two single-family residences located on APN 413- 270-014, which is located on the north side of Cherry Valley Boulevard in the northeast quadrant of the I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange.
Preliminary analysis of aerial imagery indicates the structures may include a primary living residence, an accessory guest residence, a garage, sheds, and farm buildings. However, the exact function of the structures, as well as the type and number of occupants residing in the residence, will be determined during the ROW acquisition phase of the project. The existing structures were constructed in 1965, however, because the property type is listed as "commercial," the number of bedrooms and total area (square footage) of the structures are not available. The most recent assessed values cited by the Riverside County Assessor's Office include the land at $927,221 and the improvements at $89,039, for a total assessed value of $1,016,260.
Information obtained from the project's right-of-way data sheets cite a residential relocation cost of approximately $252,000. However, real estate housing market trends indicate the approximate value of the residences to be relocated currently fall within a range of $550,000 to $650,000. As such, this range was used as the baseline for the real estate research conducted for the Relocation Impact Memorandum.
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 116 293
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Figure 2.1.6-1: Build Alternative 3 Potential ROW Acquisition Map •. arca: EERI- Rrvesidv ON*
iry
al ROT TO SCALF
LEGEND
Exist CALTRANS ROW
Exist CITY ROW
r- Prop CALTRRNS ROW
Prep CITY ROW
TCE
- ROW Fee Area
MEM TCE Arita
/'CAE]r[ia �:r P,aLICr•ENT
•
INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
INTERSTATE10/CHERRY VALLEY BOULEVARO INTERCHANGE PROJECT Build Alternative 3 Potential ROW Acquisition Map
P1071 JN 169171
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 117 Figure 2.1.6-1
Item 9.
294
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Figure 2.1.6-2: Build Alternative 4 Potential ROW Acquisition Map ,:ooreic ESRI, Rr.Vr9idi CAuMy
♦ a, HOT TO SCALE
bLYOZI M10111
INITIAL STUUYiENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
INTERSTATE10/CHERRY VALLEY BOULEVARDINTERCHANGE PROJECT Build Alternative 4 Potential ROW Acquisition Map
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 118 Figure 2.1.6-2
Item 9.
295
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Table 2.1.6-1: Potential Partial Temporary (TCE) ROW Acquisitions APN
Address
Alternative 3
Impacts (Acres)
Alternative 4
Impacts (Acres) Acquisition
Property Type/Current Land Use
Relocation
ROW
413-270-004
--
0.16 0.14
CommercialNacant Land
No
N/A
413-270-014
3607 Cherry Valley
Boulevard
2.38 2.84
Commercial/Multiple SFR Structures
No
N/A
413-270-015
36240 Cherry Valley
Boulevard
0.50 0.11
Residential/Residential
No
N/A
407-230-018
--
0.19 0.08
CommercialNacant Land
No
N/A
407-230-004
--
--
--
Commercial/Vacant Land
No
N/A
407-230-017
36015 Cherry Valley
Boulevard
0.13 --
Commercial/Vacant Land
No
N/A
407-230-016
--
0.06 --
CommercialNacant Land
No
N/A
413-780-020
--
--
--
Commercial/Shopping Center
No
N/A
413-780-018
--
0.05 --
Commercial/Shopping Center
No
N/A
413-290-044
--
0.17 0.02
CommercialNacant Land
No
N/A
413-270-021
--
--
--
CommercialNacant Land
No
N/A
413-270-019
--
--
--
CommercialNacant Land
No
N/A
413-270-020
--
--
--
ResidentialNacant Land
No
N/A
TOTAL
--
3.64 3.19
--
--
--
Source: Michael Baker International, Relocation Impact Memorandum, Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Improvement Project, July 2020.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 119 Item 9.
296
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Table 2.1.6-2: Potential Permanent ROW Acquisitions and Relocations APN
Address
Alternative 3
Impacts (Acres)
Alternative 4
Impacts (Acres)
Property Type/Current Land Use
Relocation
ROW
Acquisition
413-270-004
--
0.63 1.02
CommercialNacant Land
No
Temporary
413-270-014
3607 Cherry Valley
Boulevard
1.94 1.31
Commercial/Multiple SFR Structures
Yes (Under Alt. 4)
Temporary
413-270-015
36240 Cherry
Valley Boulevard
0.81 <0.01
Residential/Residential
No
Temporary
407-230-018
--
0.02 --
CommercialNacant Land
No
Temporary
407-230-004
--
--
0.01 CommercialNacant Land
No
Temporary
407-230-017
36015 Cherry
Valley Boulevard
--
2.77 CommercialNacant Land
No
Temporary
407-230-016
--
--
0.92 Commercial/Vacant Land
No
Temporary
413-780-020
--
0.44 0.26
Commercial/Shopping Center
No
Temporary
413-780-018
--
--
--
Commercial/Shopping Center
No
Temporary
413-290-044
--
0.02 --
CommercialNacant Land
No
Temporary
413-270-021
--
0.21 0.21
CommercialNacant Land
No
Full
TOTAL
--
4.08 6.50
--
--
--
Source: Michael Baker International, Relocation Impact Memorandum, Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Improvement Project, July 2020.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 120 Item 9.
297
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Partial permanent ROW acquisition of APN 413-270-014 would occur under Build Alternative 4, which would require acquisition and removal of the two existing residential structures on the parcel.
Real estate research was conducted to determine the availability of single- family residential replacement properties located within the City of Calimesa, as well as the adjacent City of Yucaipa to the north and community of Cherry Valley to the east. As described above, the parameters of this analysis included a sale price range of $550,000 to $650,000, and a location focused primarily in the City of Yucaipa and the adjacent community of Cherry Valley; it should be noted that there are currently no comparable properties in acreage available in the City of Calimesa. As indicated by the analysis, there are currently ample single-family residential replacement properties on the market similar to the displacement property, and it was determined that adequate housing stock is available in proximity to the project area to meet the decent, safe, and sanitary standards to relocate the displaced residents from the impacted area. In addition, U.S. Census Bureau data indicates that there is currently a 10.7 percent vacancy rate for the community; therefore, it is anticipated that there will be sufficient single-family residences that are equal to or better than the displacement property available for rent or purchase. Implementation of Minimization Measure ROW -1, below, would reduce potential relocation impacts and impacts would not be substantial.
No business relocations would occur under Build Alternatives 3 or 4. Although partial permanent acquisition of vacant land associated with the Northlight Trust 1/Marketplace Shopping Center (APN 413-780-020) would occur under the Build Alternative 4, these businesses would not be displaced as a result of project implementation. Access will be maintained during construction.
Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures
ROW -1 Right-of-way shall be acquired in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, and property owners shall receive just compensation and fair market value for their property.
2.1.7 Environmental Justice
Regulatory Setting
All projects involving a federal action (funding, permit, or land) must comply with Executive Order (EO) 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low -Income Populations, signed by President William J. Clinton on February 11, 1994. This EO directs federal agencies to take the appropriate and necessary steps to identify and address disproportionately high and adverse effects of federal projects on the health or environment of minority and low-income populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law. Low income is defined based on the Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 121 298
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Department of Health and Human Services poverty guidelines. For 2021, this was $26,500 for a family of four.
All considerations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and related statutes, have also been included in this project. The Department's commitment to upholding the mandates of Title VI is demonstrated by its Title VI Policy Statement, signed by the Director, which can be found in Appendix B of this document.
Affected Environment
This section is based on the Community Impact Assessment (CIA) Memorandum prepared for the proposed project, dated December 3, 2020.
Race and Ethnic Characteristics
As shown in Table 2.1.7-1, Ethnic and Racial Composition, the percentages of minority population for the City of Calimesa, the County of Riverside and the CIA study area census tracts are identified. Both census tracts and the City of Calimesa have similar percentages of White populations, at 81.7 percent, 93.2 percent, and 84.0 percent, respectively, whereas the County of Riverside has a lower White percentage of 60.8 percent. A similar trend occurs for the Black population in the census tracts and City of Calimesa, with Black populations of 3.2 percent, 2.1 percent, and 1.2 percent, respectively, whereas the County of Riverside shows a higher Black population of 6.4 percent.
Table 2.1.7-1: Ethnic and Racial Composition
Composition
Census
Tract
438.11
Census
Tract
438.14
City of
Calimesa
County of
Riverside
White Alone
81.7 93.2
84.0 60.8
Black or African American Alone
3.2 2.1
1.2 6.4
American Indian/Alaska Native
Alone
0.6 0.0
0.7 0.8
Asian Alone
3.8 2.8
2.1 6.4
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific
Islander Alone
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.3
Some Other Race Alone
7.9 2.0
6.4 20.8
Two or More Races
2.8 0.0
5.5 4.5
Hispanic or Latino (any race)
23.1 20.6
29.3 48.4
Source: Michael Baker International, Community Impact Assessment Memorandum, January 2021.
Both census tracts included in the study area show a low percentage of Hispanic or Latino populations, at 23.1 percent and 20.6 percent. The City of Calimesa's Hispanic percentage is similar to the census tracts at 29.3 percent, whereas the County of Riverside's Hispanic population is higher than all other areas included in the study area at 48.4 percent. Both census tracts also showed either an absence, or very low occurrence, of any American Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 122 299
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Indian and Alaska Native, Asian, and Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander populations, ranging from 0.0 percent to 3.8 percent. The City of Calimesa also shows a very low percentage of these populations, with a 0.7 percent American Indian and Alaska Native population, a 2.1 percent Asian population, and a 0.0 percent Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander population. Both census tracts and the City of Calimesa have fairly low percentages of Some Other Race populations, ranging from 2.0 percent to
7.9 percent, whereas the County of Riverside's Some Other Race population percentage is higher than all the other areas in the study area at 20.8 percent.
Poverty/Low-Income Population Characteristics
For the purposes of this discussion, the poverty threshold according to the U.S. Census Bureau was used to determine the percentages of families living below the poverty line. According to the Census Bureau, the poverty threshold for a family of four (including two adults and two children) was $25,926 in 2019 (the most recent year for which this data is available). Low income is defined based on the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) poverty guidelines. According to the DHHS 2021 Poverty Guidelines, the poverty threshold for a family of four in the State of California is $26,500.
There is a nominal difference of $574 between the Census Bureau and DHHS poverty thresholds.
Table 2.1.5-3, above, shows the median household incomes and the percentage of families living below the poverty level (low income) for the City of Calimesa, the County of Riverside, and the study area census tracts. As shown, the lowest median household income is in Census Tract 438.14 at $46,615, and the highest median household income is in the County of Riverside at $63,948—a range of approximately $17,000. The low-income figures between the City of Calimesa and census tracts are consistent, ranging from a low of 5.9 percent in the City of Calimesa to a high of 7.3 percent in Census Tract 438.11. The County of Riverside's low-income population percentage is 11.3 percent, which is nearly double that of the City of Calimesa. However, the variance of the number of families living below the poverty level within the study area is not considered to be substantial.
Environmental Consequences
Temporary Impacts
No -Build Alternative
Temporary adverse effects to environmental justice populations would not occur with implementation of the No -Build Alternative, since no construction activity would occur.
Build Alternatives 3 and 4
Traffic and Transportation
Construction activities associated with the Build Alternatives would result in temporary traffic effects related to the circulation of vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians in the project area that could affect environmental justice Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 123 300
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures populations. Construction under Build Alternatives 3 and 4 are anticipated to take approximately 24 months. Full freeway closures on 1-10 would be required for placement of the new pre -cast Cherry Boulevard structure.
Ramps would require closures at intersections with local roads, in which through access on Cherry Valley Boulevard would continue. Short-term or weekend closures are expected for certain phases; however, no long-term street closures are anticipated or would be allowed. Proposed ramp closures would be identified during the plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) phase. Traffic -handling plans and stage -construction plans will be developed to minimize queueing on the 1-10 mainline. These efforts will include off-peak hour construction hours (primarily in the late night, early morning, and weekends) and clearly marked detours near the closures.
Implementation of the Build Alternatives would include preparation and implementation of a Transportation Management Plan (TMP) during the PS&E phase. The Caltrans Transportation Management Plan Guidelines (TMP Guidelines) identifies the processes, roles, and responsibilities for preparing and implementing TMPs, as well as useful strategies for reducing congestion and managing work zone traffic impacts. The primary objective of the TMP is to maintain safe movement for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists through the construction zone, as well as minimize traffic delays during the construction period. The TMP prepared for the project will implement alternate route strategies to minimize adverse effects to roadways and reduce potential congestion.
The TMP will include, but not be limited to, the following six major elements:
• Public information/public awareness campaign
• Traveler information strategies
• Incident management
• Construction strategies
• Demand management
• Alternate route strategies
With implementation of the TMP for the Build Alternatives, adverse temporary effects related to traffic, pedestrian, and bicyclists would not occur. The community, in general, would be similarly affected, and effects of the Build Alternatives on environmental justice populations would not be more severe than the effects on nonenvironmental justice populations.
Air Quality
Temporary impacts, such as lane closures and nighttime constructions, are anticipated to occur after during construction. An increase in particulate emissions (fugitive dust) would temporarily occur through construction activities, such as clearing, cut -and -fill activities, grading, and paving.
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 124 301
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Construction activities and equipment would additionally increase certain emissions, including carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NO), sulfur dioxide (SO2) and reactive organic gases (ROGs). The increase of these emissions would be nominal and would affect the general population as a whole, and would not disproportionally affect the environmental population.
As discussed in Section 2.2.6, Air Quality, temporary impacts related to air quality would not be adverse, and would be minimized with the implementation of state and regional standardized measures. These measures would help reduce emissions for all populations during the construction phase of the Build Alternatives. Therefore, the Build Alternatives would not result in any temporary adverse effects regarding air quality that are disproportionate to the low income or minority populations in the project area. The community, in general, would be similarly affected, and effects of the Build Alternatives on environmental justice populations would not be more severe than the effects on nonenvironmental justice populations.
Noise
Construction activities are anticipated to increase noise levels in the immediate area of the project site. Equipment involved in construction activities are expected to generate noise levels that exceed the existing noise environment. As discussed in Section 2.2.7, temporary impacts to noise levels would not result in adverse effects, and would be minimized with compliance to applicable Caltrans Standard Specifications regarding construction. Therefore, the Build Alternatives would not result in any temporary adverse effects that are disproportionate to the low income or minority populations in the project area. The community, in general, would be similarly affected, and effects of the Build Alternatives on environmental justice populations would not be more severe than the effects on nonenvironmental justice populations.
Community Character and Cohesion
Community character and cohesion impacts generally are considered to be permanent because the project improvements would remain after construction is complete. Therefore, temporary impacts to community character and cohesion during construction are not anticipated.
Permanent Impacts
No -Build Alternative
Traffic and Transportation
Under the No -Build Alternative, the existing roadway and interchange configuration would remain the same, and there would be no reconstruction of the existing I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard overcrossing. As discussed in Section 2.1.9 of this IS/EA, traffic operations within the project site would deteriorate in performance. By the Design Year (2045), eastbound segments such as the Singleton Road On -Ramp, Singleton Road On -Ramp to Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp, and the Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp would deteriorate an unacceptable level of service (LOS) F during the AM Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 125 302
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures peak hours. During the PM peak hours, all eastbound segments would operate at an unacceptable LOS, with the exception of the Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp and the North of Singleton Road segments. All westbound segments would operate at an unacceptable LOS during the AM peak hour, with the exception of the Cherry Valley Boulevard Off -Ramp to On -Ramp.
This applies to all westbound segments during the PM peak hour, with the exception of Oak Valley Parkway Off -Ramp. Intersections, including the 1-10 Eastbound Off/On-Ramps/Singleton Road, 1-10 Westbound Off/On- Ramps/Singleton Road, Cherry Valley Boulevard/Palmer Avenue/Desert Lawn Drive, Cherry Valley Boulevard/Roberts Road, 1-10 Eastbound Off/On- Ramps/Cherry Valley Boulevard, 1-10 Westbound Off/On-Ramps/Cherry Valley Boulevard, 1-10 Westbound and the Off/On-Ramps/Oak Valley Parkway intersections, would deteriorate an LOS D or worse during either the AM or PM peak hours. This deterioration in LOS on local roadways would adversely impact all segments of the population, including minority and low- income population groups. This deterioration in LOS on roadways, ramp facilities, and intersections would adversely affect all segments of the population, including the minority and low-income population groups.
Air Quality
Improvements to the existing I-10/Cherry Valley interchange would not occur under the No -Build Alternative. Accordingly, adverse effects related to air quality would not occur to the general population, including the minority and low-income population groups.
Noise
Under the No Build Alternative, the surrounding area of the project site would continue to experience development and an increase in traffic. As discussed in Section 2.1.7 of this IS/EA, mobile homes and single-family residential uses would experience increase in noise levels that would exceed the federal Noise Abatement Criteria of 67 dbA. This increase in noise levels would impact all single-family households surrounding the project site including the minority and low-income population groups.
Community Character and Cohesion
Improvements to the existing I-10/Cherry Valley interchange would not occur under the No -Build Alternative. Accordingly, adverse effects to the community character and cohesion would not occur, and there would be no disproportionate impact to minority and low-income population groups.
Build Alternatives 3 and 4
Traffic and Transportation
As discussed in Section 2.1.9 of this IS/EA, implementation of the Build Alternatives would result in improved traffic operations and would either maintain or improve multiple analyzed roadway/freeway segments and intersections within the project area. In addition to improved vehicular Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 126 303
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures circulation, the Build Alternatives would include improved pedestrian and bicycle facilities where limited facilities currently exist.
The beneficial traffic conditions under the Build Alternatives would occur with respect to the general population as a whole. Therefore, the Build Alternatives would not result in disproportionate or adverse effects to environmental justice populations in the project area.
Air Quality
As discussed in Section 2.2.6 of this IS/EA, the Build Alternatives would not cause permanent significant air quality impacts during its operation in the project area. Therefore, there will be no disproportionate effects to minority and low-income population groups.
Noise
As discussed in Section 2.2.7 of this IS/EA, the Build Alternatives would result in increased noise levels that would exceed the NAC for sensitive receptors (i.e., residential land uses). Installation of feasible and reasonable soundwalls would be proposed under both Build Alternatives as a form of noise abatement. Installation of soundwalls would occur with respect to the general population as a whole. Therefore, the Build Alternatives would not result in disproportionate or adverse effects to environmental justice populations in the project area.
Community Character and Cohesion
As discussed above, there are no community facilities or facilities for emergency service in the study area. The percentage of minority populations in the study are low compared to Riverside County, and the number of families that are living below the poverty line in the study area are not considered to be substantial. As such, potentially adverse community character and cohesion impacts specific to the low-income or minority populations are not anticipated to occur under the Build Alternatives because the Build Alternatives will not physically divide, or create barriers within, any such communities in the area. The Build Alternatives would have a beneficial impact of improving access and circulation within the study area for the general public.
Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures
Based on the above discussion and analysis, the Build Alternatives will not cause disproportionately high and adverse effects on any minority or low- income populations in accordance with the provisions of EO 12898. No further environmental justice analysis is required. No measures are proposed.
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 127 304
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures
2.1.8 Utilities and Emergency Services
Affected Environment
Utilities
The following utilities exist within the project area and its vicinity:
Southern California Edison (SCE)
Southern California Edison (SCE) provides electrical power to the project area, the City of Calimesa, and Riverside County. The following SCE utilities are present within the project site:
• One overhead utility line that is part of a set of overhead transmission lines located along Calimesa Boulevard;
• One overhead utility line that runs across Cherry Valley Boulevard, south of the eastbound 1-10 ramp intersection; and
• One underground utility line runs across and along Cherry Valley Boulevard.
Southern California Gas Company fSoCal Gas)
Medium and high-pressure pipelines from SoCal Gas are located on -site at the following locations:
• One six-inch medium pressure pipeline running along Cherry Valley Boulevard, west of 1-10.
• One ten -inch high pressure underground pipeline beginning at Calimesa Boulevard that traverses 1-10. The pipeline travels along Roberts Road and into Desert Lawn Drive.
• One four -inch high pressure pipeline that travels along Roberts Road. • One six-inch medium pressure pipeline along Calimesa Boulevard. • One six-inch medium pressure pipeline at the intersection of Calimesa Boulevard and Cherry Valley Boulevard.
Telecommunications
Charter Communications, Verizon Wireless, and AT&T provide cable, television, and phone services to the project site. Cable lines and utilities occur on -site at the following locations:
Charter Communications
• One overhead cable line running along Calimesa Boulevard. • One underground cable line running along Calimesa Boulevard. • One underground cable line running along Cherry Valley Boulevard.
Verizon
• One underground cable line, beginning at Calimesa Boulevard, that traverses 1-10.
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 128 305
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures AT&T
• One overhead cable line along Roberts Road.
Sprint
• One Sprint Cell Tower west of 1-10, within project boundaries.
Water
Water services to the project study area are provided by the Beaumont - Cherry Valley Water District. Underground water lines that are to be constructed with the project include the following:
• Three 24 -inch water lines (two potable and one non -potable) along westbound Cherry Valley Boulevard.
Sewer
Sewage services to the project site are provided by the Yucaipa Valley Water District. Sewage lines occur on -site at the following locations:
• One six-inch existing sewer line located at/along westbound 1-10.
Emergency Services
The following emergency service providers are located in the project area and its vicinity:
Police
Police protection services to the project site and surrounding areas are provided by the Riverside County Sheriff's Department (RCSD). The City of Calimesa contracts with RCSD for provision of police protection assistance.
RCSD services for the project area are based out of its patrol station located at 50290 Main Street in Cabazon.
The California Highway Patrol (CHP) also provides police services in the region, such as traffic regulation enforcement and emergency accident management and service but is primarily limited to the existing state route and interstate highway systems that extend throughout the region.
Fire
Fire protection services within the City of Calimesa are provided by the Calimesa Fire Department. The Calimesa Fire Department has one fire station that is located at 906 Park Avenue in Calimesa. The Riverside County Fire Department provides fire protection services to unincorporated areas of the County, and also provides additional emergency fire protection and suppression services to the City of Calimesa and the project area under mutual and automatic aid agreements. These services include provide fire dispatch services and auto aid services for structure and vegetation fires.
Riverside County Fire Department services for the project area are based out of its fire station located at 10055 Avenida Miravilla in the Cherry Valley community.
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 129 306
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Hospitals
The nearest hospital to the project site is San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital at 600 North Highland Springs Ave in the City of Banning. The hospital is approximately 5.4 miles from the project site and provides emergency and intensive care services.
Environmental Consequences
Temporary Impacts
Utilities
No -Build Alternative
Under the No -Build Alternative, no construction would occur; therefore, adverse temporary effects related to utilities would not occur.
Build Alternatives 3 and 4
The project's final design process (the Plans, Specifications, and Estimates [PS&E] phase) would address all potential utility relocation that may be required during the construction phase of the project. An updated utility search would be conducted during final design to determine any utility conflicts requiring attention. Coordination with the identified utility companies would be carried out during the PS&E and construction phases. No service disruptions are anticipated to occur to any of the utilities during construction.
Accordingly, adverse effects related to utilities during construction of the project are not anticipated.
Emergency Services
No -Build Alternative
Under the No -Build Alternative, no construction would occur; therefore, temporary construction adverse effects to emergency services would not occur.
Build Alternatives 3 and 4
Freeway, street, and lane closures are anticipated to occur intermittently during the construction phase of the project. Access to developed areas in proximity to the project may potentially be constrained intermittently during construction. As a method of minimizing potential delay in emergency response time, travel through the project area would be maintained for emergency service vehicles during project construction through implementation of a TMP. The Caltrans TMP Guidelines require consideration and notification of emergency service providers to provide for adequate emergency access during the temporary construction process. With preparation of the TMP during the PS&E phase, adverse effects would not occur in this regard.
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 130 307
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Permanent Impacts
Utilities
No -Build Alternative
Under the No -Build Alternative, the I-10/Cherry Boulevard interchange and the surrounding transportation network would be maintained; therefore, no permanent changes or adverse effects to existing utilities in the project area would occur.
Build Alternatives 3 and 4
Permanent adverse effects to utilities under the Build Alternatives would include multiple relocations, as described in Table 2.1.8-1 below.
Table 2.1.8-1. Utility Relocations
Item 9.
Utility
Company/Owner
Utility Type
Relocation Information
Southern California
Gas (SCG)
Gas — One six-inch medium
pressure line along existing
Calimesa Boulevard.
Utility will be realigned with the
realignment of Calimesa Boulevard by
approximately 1,500 linear feet relocation.
Yucaipa Valley
Water District
Sewer — One six-inch line within
State ROW outside of westbound
1-10 shoulder.
Utility will be realigned within same
vicinity of State ROW, approximately
3,000 linear feet to avoid bridge
abutments and westbound 1-10 ramp
realignments.
Beaumont -Cherry
Valley Water
District (BCVWD)
Water — Three 24 -inch Lines (Two
Potable and One Non -Potable) to
be Constructed with Project.
Utility will be constructed with the project,
along Cherry Valley Boulevard.
Southern California
Edison (SCE)
Electric — Three lines; two
overhead (one line running across
and along existing Calimesa
Boulevard and a second line
running across Cherry Valley
Boulevard south of the eastbound
1-10 ramp intersection) and one
underground transmission line
running across and along Cherry
Valley Boulevard.
The overhead utility line that runs along
and across Calimesa Boulevard will be
realigned with the realignment of
Calimesa Boulevard by approximately
1,500 linear feet relocation. The overhead
utility line that runs across Cherry Valley
Boulevard will be relocated across Cherry
Valley Boulevard by approximately 400
linear feet relocation. The underground
utility line that runs along and across
Cherry Valley Boulevard will be realigned
along Cherry Valley Boulevard by
approximately 700 linear feet relocation.
Charter
Communications
Communication — Overhead cable
line running along existing
Calimesa Boulevard.
Utility will be realigned with the
realignment of Calimesa Boulevard by
approximately 1,500 linear feet relocation.
Frontier (Verizon)
Communication — Underground
line running along existing
Calimesa Boulevard.
Utility will be realigned with the
realignment of Calimesa Boulevard by
approximately 1,500 linear feet relocation.
Prior to the completion of final design, coordination with any of the above affected utility providers in the vicinity of the I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange project would be completed, to verify that the project would not disrupt services. For any utilities affected, all required coordination would be completed to establish exact procedures and specifications for addressing Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 131 308
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures facilities impacted by the project, and as necessary, additional analysis would be completed, and any measures identified in conjunction with the completion of additional analysis would be implemented. Any required relocations of utilities would be completed prior to any project -related construction.
Accordingly, no permanent adverse effects to utilities are anticipated.
Emergency Services
No -Build Alternative
Under the No -Build Alternative, the I-10/Cherry Boulevard interchange and the surrounding transportation network would be maintained; therefore, no permanent changes or adverse effects to emergency services in the project area would occur.
Build Alternatives 3 and 4
Through the project's improvement of the I-10/Cherry Boulevard interchange, Build Alternatives 3 and 4 would improve mobility, circulation and traffic operations at the interchange and the surrounding roadways. In turn, emergency services would be able to travel through the interchange more efficiently, resulting in improved travel and response times in emergency situations. There would be no adverse effects related to emergency services under the Build Alternatives.
Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures
No measures are proposed.
2.1.9 Traffic and Transportation/Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Regulatory Setting
The Department, as assigned by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), directs that full consideration should be given to the safe accommodation of pedestrians and bicyclists during the development of Federal -aid highway projects (see 23 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 652). It further directs that the special needs of the elderly and the disabled must be considered in all Federal -aid projects that include pedestrian facilities. When current or anticipated pedestrian and/or bicycle traffic presents a potential conflict with motor vehicle traffic, every effort must be made to minimize the detrimental effects on all highway users who share the facility.
In July 1999, the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) issued an Accessibility Policy Statement pledging a fully accessible multimodal transportation system. Accessibility in federally assisted programs is governed by the USDOT regulations (49 CFR 27) implementing Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 United States Code [USC] 794). The FHWA has enacted regulations for the implementation of the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), including a commitment to build transportation facilities that provide equal access for all persons. These regulations require Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 132 309
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures application of the ADA requirements to federal -aid projects, including Transportation Enhancement Activities.
Affected Environment
This section is based on the 1-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project Approval and Environmental Document Traffic Operations Analysis Report (TOAR) (dated November 2020).
Roadway Facilities
Key travel routes within the study area include 1-10, Cherry Valley Boulevard, Calimesa Boulevard and Roberts Road. 1-10 is an interstate highway that extends east -west along the City of Calimesa and Riverside County. Within the limits of the project site, it operates as an arterial divided by a Jersey concrete barrier, with three lanes in each direction. The posted speed limit on 1-10 is 65 miles per hour throughout the length of the project site. Riverside County classifies 1-10 as a major freeway. 1-10 originates in Santa Monica, California, and extends eastward to its terminus in Jacksonville, Florida.
Cherry Valley Boulevard begins at the Noble Street intersection, and travels through the City of Calimesa and unincorporated areas of Riverside County in a westerly direction. Cherry Valley Boulevard currently terminates at its intersection with Beaumont Street within the Cherry Valley unincorporated community. The posted speed limit on Cherry Valley Boulevard is 35 miles per hour west of the interchange and the posted speed limit of 55 miles per hour east of the interchange.
Calimesa Boulevard is a two-lane (one lane in each direction) major arterial roadway that parallels 1-10 and traverses unincorporated territory into the City of Calimesa, beginning at its intersection with Cherry Valley Boulevard within the project site, and ending at a "T" intersection with Live Oak Canyon Road/Oak Canyon Road in the City.
Old Roberts Road is a two-lane (one lane in each direction) arterial roadway that parallels 1-10. Old Roberts Road begins at its intersection with Cherry Valley Boulevard within the project site, and transitions into Woodhouse Road west of Singleton Road. The posted speed limit on Robert Road is 35 miles per hour.
Desert Lawn Drive/ Palmer Avenue is a two lane (one lane in each direction) secondary arterial roadway. As Palmer Avenue, the roadway travels through planned development within Summerwind Ranch in a southwest direction. At its intersection with Cherry Valley Boulevard, the roadway bisects into Desert Lawn Drive and continues to travel in a southwest direction, where it parallels 1-10. The posted speed limit on Palmer Avenue and Desert Lawn Drive is 35 miles per hour.
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 133 310
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities
Pedestrian facilities are sparse and in various locations of the project site.
Sidewalks are located at the I-10/Cherry Boulevard overcrossing, and along Roberts Road. There are currently no designated bicycle lanes or facilities within the study area. Project implementation would improve pedestrian and bicycle movement within the area by replacing existing facilities and including additional pedestrian and bicycle facilities to promote connectivity. According to the Calimesa General Plan, bicycle lanes are planned along Cherry Valley Boulevard, south of Roberts Road, along Roberts Road, west of Cherry Valley Boulevard, and along Palmer Avenue/Desert Lawn Drive, east and west of the Cherry Valley Boulevard and Palmer Avenue/Desert Lawn Drive intersection within the project area. The Riverside County General Plan does not identify proposed bicycle or pedestrian facilities within the project area.
Study Area
The study area covers segments of the 1-10 from south of the Singleton Road interchange to north of the Oak Valley Parkway interchange, and the area is bounded by Calimesa Boulevard to the north and Wildwood Creek and Palmer Avenue/Desert Lawn Drive to the south. The study locations consist of the 1-10 mainline segments and ramp junctions in the study area, as well as the intersections of the 1-10 ramps and arterials within the study area. Figure
2.1.9-1, Traffic Study Area, depicts the traffic study area associated with the project. The following freeway segments and roadway intersections were analyzed:
Study Intersections
• Singleton Road/I-10 Eastbound Ramps
• Singleton Road/I-10 Westbound Ramps
• Cherry Valley Boulevard/Palmer Avenue/Desert Lawn Drive • Cherry Valley Boulevard/Roberts Road
• Cherry Valley Boulevard/I-10 Eastbound Ramps
• Cherry Valley Boulevard/I-10 Westbound Ramps
• Cherry Valley Boulevard/Calimesa Boulevard
• Oak Valley Parkway/I-10 Eastbound Ramps
• Oak Valley Parkway/I-10 Westbound Ramps
Peak period turning movement counts by vehicle classification were collected for the AM (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and the PM (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) for all study intersections noted above.
Study Freeway Segments
Eastbound Direction
• I-10 Merge from Singleton Road
• I-10 Mainline between Singleton Road and Cherry Valley Boulevard Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 134 311
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures Figure 2.1.9-1: Traffic Study Area
0 LEGEND
0 0 Study Intersection
AM (PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volume
Lane Configuration
Stop Sign
$ Signalized
Calimesa
See Inset A4°
•
T
Beaumont
See Inset B
Saurae Fehr & Peers. Theft OpereoaxAna yes Report. Novemher 2070 0 NOT TO SCALE
81.2821 II 189171
INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
INTERSTATE 10/CHERRY VALLEY BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT Traffic Study Area
Figure 2.1.9.1
Item 9.
Interstate 10/Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange Project • 135 312
Chapter 2 • Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures • I-10 Diverge to Cherry Valley Boulevard
• I-10 Merge from Cherry Valley Boulevard
• I-10 Mainline between Cherry Valley Boulevard and Oak Valley Parkway • I-10 Diverge to Oak Valley Parkway
Westbound Direction
• I-10 Merge from Oak Valley Parkway
• I-10 Mainline between Oak Valley Parkway and Cherry Valley Boulevard • I-10 Diverge to Cherry Valley Boulevard
• I-10 Merge from Cherry Valley Boulevardl-10 Mainline between Cherry Valley Boulevard and Singleton Road
Study Scenarios
Project alternatives were analyzed under both Opening Year 2025 and Design Year 2045 conditions. The study scenarios for traffic operations analysis include the following:
• Existing (2019) Conditions
• Opening Year (2025) No -Build Alternative
• Opening Year (2025) Build Alternatives 3 and 4
• Design Year (2045) No -Build Alternative
• Design Year (2045) Build Alternatives 3 and 4
Traffic Analysis Methodology
Traffic Forecasting Methodology
Travel demand was primarily modeled using the Riverside County Traffic Analysis Model (RIVTAM). The original RIVTAM model land use information was based on the 2008 SCAG model, the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) has updated the land use in the model, which includes the study area, and is consistent with the 2016 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). The land use updated for WRCOG is now considered the best available information for the area that is consistent with the SCAG model. As such, the land use information assumed in RIVTAM was replaced with the WRCOG land use information for modeling efforts for this project. The updated land use assumes a 2012 Base Year and a 2040 Future Year.