Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Bell Gardens City Council
April 10, 2023

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
April 10, 2023
Body
Bell Gardens City Council
Pages
17
Original file
1.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on portal.laserfiche.com. That file is the official record.

Exhibit 10 430

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO e) In each year in which DHCS prepares an annual report DHCS will also host a meeting to discuss the annual report and the Opioid Remediation activities being carried out by the State and Participating Subdivisions.

6. Miscellaneous
a) The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this CA Walgreens Allocation Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet and confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated motion or action, and vice versa.
b) Except as provided in the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, this CA Walgreens Allocation Agreement is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in the CA Walgreens Allocation Agreement, if any provision of this agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement, or the application of such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. d) Except as provided in the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, this agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.

Exhibit 10
4�1

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO The undersigned, Bell Gardens city, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds — Walgreens Settlement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision in the Walgreens Settlement and ACCEPTS this Proposed California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds — Walgreens Settlement. EXECUTED on Signature:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Exhibit 10 4932
Michael B. O'Kelly
City Manager
April 10, 2023

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights, releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds Walgreens Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not change. Participating Subdivisions, underlying calculations, and the calculated allocation percentages are subject to change.

Regarding the column herein entitled "Abatement Percentage," pursuant to Section 4.B.e., the State of California will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision.

Regarding the column herein entitled "Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage," payments allocated to a Plaintiff Subdivision, which is not an Initial Participating Subdivision, will be re -allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions.

Regarding the column herein entitled "Abatement Percentage," the annotation of "100%" refers to one -hundred percent (100%) of the California Abatement Account Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.B. Regarding the column herein entitled "Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage," the annotation of "100%" refers to one -hundred percent (100%) of the California Subdivision Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.C. Regarding the column herein entitled "Weighted Allocation Percentage," the annotation of "100%" refers to one - hundred percent (100%) of the combined and weighted allocation of the Abatement Percentage and the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage.

Exhibit 10 433

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
100.000% 100.000%
100.000%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Ailcation
Percentage
County
Alameda County
Alameda

2.332%

2.853%

2.4237952%
City
Alameda
Alameda

0.069%

0.0570162%
City
Albany
Alameda

0.013%

0.0107768%
City
Berkeley
Alameda

0.152%

0.1249656%
City
Dublin
Alameda

0.033%

0.040%

0.0338810%
City
Emeryville
Alameda

0.023%

0.0185765%
City
Fremont
Alameda

0.108%

0.0888576%
City
Hayward
Alameda

0.117%

0.0966218%
City
Liveriiiore
Alameda

0.054%

0.0446740%
City
Newark
Alameda

0.026%

0.0217626%
City
Oakland
Alameda

0.486%

0.595%

0.5055601%
City
Piedmont
Alameda

0.014%

0.0114064%
City
Pleasanton
Alameda

0.067%

0.0554547%
City
San Leandro
Alameda

0.039%

0.0321267%
City
Union City
Alameda

0.043%

0.0352484%
County
Amador County
Amador

0.226%

0.277%

0.2349885%
County
Butte County
Butte

1.615%

1.975%

1.6783178%
City
Chico
Butte

0.216%

0.264%

0.2246499%
City
Oroville
Butte

0.079%

0.0646595%
County
Calaveras County
Calaveras

0.226%

0.277%

0.2351644%
County
Colusa County
Colusa

0.059%

0.0489221%
County
Contra Costa County
Contra Costa

2.102%

2.571%

2.1844585%
City
Antioch
Contra Costa

0.037%

0.0301879%
City
Brentwood
Contra Costa

0.026%

0.0215339%
City
Clayton
Contra Costa

0.002%

0.0018060%
City
Concord
Contra Costa

0.055%

0.0456676%
City
Danville
Contra Costa

0.010%

0.0082255%
City
El Cerrito
Contra Costa

0.023%

0.0189024%
City
Hercules
Contra Costa

0.010%

0.0078273%
1 of 15
Exhibit 10 434

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
Lafayette
Contra Costa

0.006%

0.0046030%
City
Martinez
Contra Costa

0.012%

0.0098593%
City
Moraga
Contra Costa

0.004%

0.0031007%
City
Oakley
Contra Costa

0.010%

0.0079416%
City
Orinda
Contra Costa

0.005%

0.0038157%
City
Pinole
Contra Costa

0.013%

0.0110909%
City
Pittsburg
Contra Costa

0.053%

0.0436369%
City
Pleasant Hill
Contra Costa

0.013%

0.0106309%
City
Richmond
Contra Costa

0.146%

0.1201444%
City
San Pablo
Contra Costa

0.018%

0.0148843%
City
San Ramon
Contra Costa

0.021%

0.0176459%
City
Walnut Creek
Contra Costa

0.026%

0.0212132%
County
Del Norte County
Del Norte

0.114%

0.140%

0.1189608%
County
El Dorado County
El Dorado

0.768%

0.939%

0.7980034%
City
Placerville
El Dorado

0.015%

0.0127642%
City
South Lake Tahoe
El Dorado

0.081%

0.0665456%
County
Fresno County
Fresno

1.895%

2.318%

1.9693410%
City
Clovis
Fresno

0.065%

0.0536211%
City
Coalinga
Fresno

0.012%

0.0098554%
City
Fresno
Fresno

0.397%

0.3270605%
City
Kei ian
Fresno

0.005%

0.0042534%
City
Kingsburg
Fresno

0.008%

0.0066167%
City
Mendota
Fresno

0.002%

0.0019387%
City
Orange Cove
Fresno

0.004%

0.0035607%
City
Parlier
Fresno

0.008%

0.0069755%
City
Reedley
Fresno

0.012%

0.0098804%
City
Sanger
Fresno

0.018%

0.0146135%
City
Selma
Fresno

0.015%

0.0127537%
County
Glenn County
Glenn

0.107%

0.131%

0.1116978%
County
Humboldt County
Humboldt

1.030%

1.260%

1.0703185%
2 of 15
Exhibit 10 435

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
Conn ty
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
Arcata
Humboldt

0.054%

0.0447660%
City
Eureka
Humboldt

0.117%

0.1.43%

0.121.6284%
City
Fortuna
Humboldt

0.032%

0.0266837%
County
Imperial County
Imperial

0.258%

0.315%

0.2679006%
City
Brawley
Imperial

0.011%

0.0087986%
City
Calexico
Imperial

0.019%

0.01.52799%
City
El Centro
Imperial

0.158%

0.1302522%
City
Im Derial
Imperial

0.006%

0.0048791%
County
Inyo County
Inyo

0.073%

0.089%

0.0754413%
County
Kern County
Kern

2.517%

3.079%

2.6159145%
City
Arvin
Kern

0.006%

0.0046425%
City
Bakersfield
Kern

0.212%

0.1747198%
City
California City
Kern

0.009%

0.0070820%
City
Delano
Kern

0.030%
0M249316%
City
McFarland
Kern

0.003%

0.0025644%
City
Ridgecrest
Kern

0.015%
0M120938%
City
Shafter
Kern

0.013%

0.0103417%
City
Tehachapi
Kern

0.009%

0.0073580%
City
Wasco
Kern

0.008%

0.0069861%
County
Kings County
Kings

0.293%

0.2413469%
City
Avenal
Kings

0.007%

0.0056335%
City
Corcoran
Kings

0.013%

0.0107032%
City
Hanford
Kings

0.027%

0.0226038%
City
Lemoore
Kings

0.016%

0.0131900%
County
Lake County
Lake

0.795%

0.6545389%
City
Clearlake
Lake

0.041%

0.050%
0M426253%
City
Lakeport
Lake

0.021%

0.026%

0.0222964%
County
Lassen County
Lassen

0.319%

0.391%

0.332061.0%
City
Susanville
Lassen

0.027%

0.0219295%
County
Los Angeles County
Los Angeles

13.896%

16.999%

14.4437559%
3 of 15
Exhibit 10 436

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
Agoura Hills
Los Angeles

0.005%

0.0040024%
City
Alhambra
Los Angeles

0.042%

0.0343309%
City
Arcadia
Los Angeles

0.033%

0.0267718%
City
Artesia
Los Angeles

0.001%

0.0005100%
City
Azusa
Los Angeles

0.026%

0.0210857%
City
Baldwin Park
Los Angeles

0.027%

0.0218520%
City
Bell
Los Angeles

0.008%

0.0068783%
City
Bellflower
Los Angeles

0.002%

0.0014485%
City
Bell Gardens
Los Angeles

0.014%

0.0114301%
City
Beverly Hills
Los Angeles

0.065%

0.0534897%
City
Burbank
Los Angeles

0.100%

0.0823132%
City
Calabasas
Los Angeles

0.006%

0.0048948%
City
Carson
Los Angeles

0.019%

0.0159805%
City
Cerritos
Los Angeles

0.005%

0.0039682%
City
Claremont
Los Angeles

0.010%

0.0082584%
City
Commerce
Los Angeles

0.000%

0.0002971%
City
Compton
Los Angeles

0.044%

0.0361882%
City
Covina
Los Angeles

0.028%

0.0229127%
City
Cudahy
Los Angeles

0.001%

0.0006020%
City
Culver City
Los Angeles

0.055%

0.0449894%
City
Diamond Bar
Los Angeles

0.001%

0.0006993%
City
Downey
Los Angeles

0.052%

0.0429994%
City
Duarte
Los Angeles

0.003%

0.0027261%
City
El Monte
Los Angeles

0.031%

0.038%

0.0318985%
City
El Segundo
Los Angeles

0.033%

0.0268020%
City
Gardena
Los Angeles

0.034%

0.0278088%
City
Glendale
Los Angeles

0.166%

0.1366586%
City
Glendora
Los Angeles

0.016%

0.0134411%
City
Hawaiian Gardens
Los Angeles

0.005%

0.0040549%
City
Hawthorne
Los Angeles

0.050%

0.0407833%
4 of 15
Exhibit 10 437

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
Conn ty
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
AIlcation
Percentage
City
Hen iosa Beach
Los Angeles

0.018%

0.0145307%
City
Huntington Park
Los Angeles

0.023%
0M190667%
City
Inglewood
Los Angeles

0.059%

0.0489195%
City
La Canada Flintridge
Los Angeles

0.003%
0M025565%
City
Lakewood
Los Angeles

0.005%

0.0039971%
City
La Mirada
Los Angeles

0.010%
0M081572%
City
Lancaster
Los Angeles

0.045%

0.0369689%
City
La Puente
Los Angeles

0.002%

0.001.2999%
City
La Verne
Los Angeles

0.024%

0.0194190%
City
Lawndale
Los Angeles

0.002%
0M017731%
City
Lomita
Los Angeles

0.004%

0.0031940%
City
Long Beach
Los Angeles

0.439%

0.361.4151%
City
Los Angeles
Los Angeles

2.715%

3.321%

2.8218811%
City
Lynwood
Los Angeles

0.016%
0M134345%
City
Malibu
Los Angeles

0.002%

0.0019269%
City
Manhattan Beach
Los Angeles

0.032%

0.0260686%
City
Maywood
Los Angeles

0.004%

0.0035528%
City
Monrovia
Los Angeles

0.031%

0.0254455%
City
Montebello
Los Angeles

0.030%

0.0250670%
City
Monterey Park
Los Angeles

0.031%

0.0256677%
City
Norwalk
Los Angeles

0.031%

0.0258228%
City
Palmdale
Los Angeles

0.046%

0.0375827%
City
Palos Verdes Estates
Los Angeles

0.006%

0.0053102%
City
Paramount
Los Angeles

0.011%

0.0091483%
City
Pasadena
Los Angeles

0.146%

0.1200524%
City
Pico Rivera
Los Angeles

0.022%

0.0183333%
City
Pomona
Los Angeles

0.111%

0.0911933%
City
Rancho Palos Verdes
Los Angeles

0.002%
0M012645%
City
Redondo Beach
Los Angeles

0.062%

0.0506992%
City
Rosemead
Los Angeles

0.003%
0M028260%
5 of 15
Exhibit 10 438

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
Conn ty
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
San Dimas
Los Angeles

0.003%

0.0022016%
City
San Fernando
Los Angeles

0.013%
0M104837%
City
San Gabriel
Los Angeles

0.018%

0.0147726%
City
San Marino
Los Angeles

0.009%
0M073791%
City
Santa Clarita
Los Angeles

0.022%

0.0178167%
City
Santa Fe Springs
Los Angeles

0.031%

0.0257531%
City
Santa Monica
Los Angeles

0.158%

0.1298513%
City
Sierra Madre
Los Angeles

0.006%

0.0048646%
City
Signal Hill
Los Angeles

0.010%

0.0084884%
City
South El Monte
Los Angeles

0.005%

0.0039603%
City
South Gate
Los Angeles

0.020%

0.0166272%
City
South Pasadena
Los Angeles

0.012%

0.0095334%
City
Tem ple City
Los Angeles

0.005%

0.0039498%
City
Torrance
Los Angeles

0.1.12%
0M919820%
City
Walnut
Los Angeles

0.006%

0.0047305%
City
West Covina
Los Angeles

0.049%

0.0404521%
City
West Hollywood
Los Angeles

0.013%

0.0108517%
City
Whittier
Los Angeles

0.032%

0.0260581%
County
Madera County
Madera

0.349%

0.427%

0.3630669%
City
Chowchilla
Madera

0.012%

0.0097332%
City
Madera
Madera

0.039%

0.0318441%
County
Marin County
Marin

0.564%

0.690%

0.5861325%
City
Larks3ur
Marin

0.015%

0.0124697%
City
Mill. Valley
Marin

0.020%

0.0168401%
City
Novato
Marin

0.028%

0.0229824%
City
San Ansehno
Marin

0.009%

0.0078062%
City
San Rafael
Marin

0.089%

0.0729823%
County
Mariposa County
Mari Dosa

0.084%

0.103%
0M876131%
County
Mendocino County
Mendocino

0.439%

0.536%

0.4558394%
City
Ukiah
Mendocino

0.039%
0M317153%
6 of 15
Exhibit 10 439

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
County
Merced County
Merced

0.551%

0.674%

0.5724262%
City
Atwater
Merced

0.024%

0.0195846%
City
Livingston
Merced

0.006%

0.0045873%
City
Los Banos
Merced

0.020%

0.0165142%
City
Merced
Merced

0.061%

0.0500762%
County
Modoc County
Modoc

0.065%

0.080%

0.0678250%
County
Mono County
Mono

0.023%

0.029%

0.0242606%
County
Monterey County
Monterey

0.908%

1.1.11 %

0.9437083%
City
Greenfield
Monterey

0.006%

0.0050552%
City
King City
Monterey

0.005%

0.0037355%
City
Marina
Monterey

0.017%

0.0144098%
City
Monterey
Monterey

0.041%

0.0336540%
City
Pacific Grove
Monterey

0.009%

0.0074842%
City
Salinas
Monterey

0.094%

0.0776576%
City
Seaside
Monterey

0.023%

0.0191772%
City
Soledad
Monterey

0.007%

0.0060870%
County
Napa County
Na la

0.288%

0.352%

0.2994325%
City
American Canyon
Na la

0.017%

0.0136869%
City
Napa
Na la

0.078%

0.0642783%
County
Nevada County
Nevada

0.441%

0.539%

0.4579827%
City
Grass Valley
Nevada

0.024%

0.0197805%
City
Truckee
Nevada

0.003%

0.0023843%
County
Orange County
Orange

4.364%

5.339%

4.5363576%
City
Aliso Vic'o
Orange

0.014%

0.0113841%
City
Anaheim
Orange

0.554%

0.678%

0.5759282%
City
Brea
Orange

0.086%

0.0708897%
City
Buena Park
Orange

0.087%

0.0714352%
City
Costa Mesa
Orange

0.124%

0.152%

0.1288366%
City
Cypress
Orange

0.033%

0.0271937%
City
Dana Point
Orange

0.001%

0.0005560%
7 of 15
Exhibit 10 440

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
Fountain Valley
Orange

0.055%

0.0455980%
City
Fullerton
Orange

0.137%

0.168%

0.1425744%
City
Garden Grove
Orange

0.213%

0.1752482%
City
Huntington Beach
Orange

0.247%

0.302%

0.2568420%
City
Irvine
Orange

0.139%

0.170%

0.1442350%
City
Laguna Beach
Orange

0.047%

0.058%

0.0493043%
City
Laguna Hills
Orange

0.014%

0.0115457%
City
Laguna Niguel
Orange

0.001%

0.0007071%
City
Laguna Woods
Orange

0.001%

0.0006546%
City
La Habra
Orange

0.060%

0.073%

0.0621049%
City
Lake Forest
Orange

0.012%

0.0101249%
City
La Palma
Orange

0.012%

0.0095439%
City
Los Alamitos
Orange

0.008%

0.0069190%
City
Mission Vie'o
Orange

0.014%

0.0117560%
City
Newport Beach
Orange

0.179%

0.1470134%
City
Orange
Orange

0.150%

0.1231320%
City
Placentia
Orange

0.029%

0.035%

0.0298912%
City
Rancho Santa Margarita
Orange

0.001%

0.0006296%
City
San Clemente
Orange

0.008%

0.010%

0.0086083%
City
San Juan Capistrano
Orange

0.008%

0.0065510%
City
Santa Ana
Orange

0.502%

0.614%

0.5213866%
City
Seal Beach
Orange

0.020%

0.0165891%
City
Stanton
Orange

0.035%

0.0291955%
City
Tustin
Orange

0.073%

0.0600341%
City
Westminster
Orange

0.104%

0.127%

0.1082721%
City
Yorba Linda
Orange

0.044%

0.0362223%
County
Placer County
Placer

1.045%

1.278%

1.0861002%
City
Auburn
Placer

0.017%

0.0141114%
City
Lincoln
Placer

0.031%

0.0255599%
City
Rocklin
Placer

0.076%

0.0625485%
8 of 15
Exhibit 10
441

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
Conn ty
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
Roseville
Placer

0.196%

0.1616559%
County
Plumas County
Plumas

0.205%

0.251%

0.2128729%
County
Riverside County
Riverside

4.534%

5.547%

4.7128296%
City
Banning
Riverside

0.017%
0M143848%
City
Beaumont
Riverside

0.021%

0.0171135%
City
Blythe
Riverside

0.012%
0M096714%
City
Canyon Lake
Riverside

0.000%

0.0001761%
City
Cathedral. City
Riverside

0.067%

0.0553614%
City
Coachella
Riverside

0.021%

0.0173054%
City
Corona
Riverside

0.1.47%

0.1.207083%
City
Desert Hot S brings
Riverside

0.024%

0.0200433%
City
Eastvale
Riverside

0.000%

0.0002747%
City
Hemet
Riverside

0.051%

0.0421792%
City
Indio
Riverside

0.056%

0.0457794%
City
Juru pa Valley
Riverside

0.001%

0.0008991%
City
Lake Elsinore
Riverside

0.021%

0.0172949%
City
La Quinta
Riverside

0.063%

0.0516732%
City
Menifee
Riverside

0.032%

0.0260909%
City
Moreno Valley
Riverside

0.137%

0.1130348%
City
Murrieta
Riverside

0.048%

0.059%

0.0497423%
City
Norco
Riverside

0.016%

0.0134542%
City
Palm Desert
Riverside

0.083%

0.0682465%
City
Palm Springs
Riverside

0.076%

0.0629862%
City
Perris
Riverside

0.009%

0.0076774%
City
Rancho Mirage
Riverside

0.052%

0.0431098%
City
Riverside
Riverside

0.268%

0.2206279%
City
San Jacinto
Riverside

0.010%

0.0085936%
City
Temecula
Riverside

0.022%
0M180086%
City
Wildomar
Riverside

0.008%

0.0062500%
County
Sacramento County
Sacramento

3.797%

4.645%

3.9465887%
9 of 15
Exhibit 10 442

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
Conn ty
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
Citrus Heights
Sacramento

0.057%

0.0465312%
City
Elk Grove
Sacramento

0.130%

0.1066994%
City
Folsom
Sacramento

0.108%

0.0890850%
City
Galt
Sacramento

0.017%
0M143704%
City
Rancho Cordova
Sacramento

0.008%

0.0067679%
City
Sacramento
Sacramento

0.721%

0.882%

0.7496530%
County
San Benito County
San Benito

0.106%

0.130%

0.1101417%
City
Hollister
San Benito

0.027%

0.0225355%
County
San Bernardino County
San Bernardino

3.259%

3.987%

3.3878124%
City
Adelanto
San Bernardino

0.008%

0.0066640%
City
A 1 ple Valley
San Bernardino

0.025%

0.0207360%
City
Barstow
San Bernardino

0.015%

0.0122056%
City
Chino
San Bernardino

0.064%

0.0525893%
City
Chino Hills
San Bernardino

0.001%

0.0006388%
City
Colton
San Bernardino

0.031%

0.0253443%
City
Fontana
San Bernardino

0.1.12%

0.0920543%
City
Grand Terrace
San Bernardino

0.006%

0.0051051%
City
Hesperia
San. Bernardino

0.035%

0.0291522%
City
Highland
San Bernardino

0.004%

0.0029061%
City
Loma Linda
San. Bernardino

0.009%

0.0071188%
City
Montclair
San Bernardino

0.039%

0.0322108%
City
Ontario
San. Bernardino

0.1.79%

0.1.472934%
City
Rancho Cucamonga
San Bernardino

0.084%

0.0689431%
City
Redlands
San. Bernardino

0.057%

0.0469150%
City
Rialto
San Bernardino

0.073%

0.0603206%
City
San Bernardino
San. Bernardino

0.178%

0.1.461.880%
City
Twentynine Palms
San Bernardino

0.002%

0.0012605%
City
Upland
San Bernardino

0.052%
0M424460%
City
Victorville
San Bernardino

0.033%

0.0269400%
City
Yucaipa
San Bernardino

0.016%

0.0128772%
10 of 15
Exhibit 10 443

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
Conn ty
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
Yucca Valley
San Bernardino

0.003%

0.0021228%
County
San Diego County
San Diego

5.706%

6.980%

5.9309748%
City
Carlsbad
San Diego

0.128%

0.1050485%
City
Chula Vista
San Diego

0.189%

0.231%

0.1.961456%
City
Coronado
San Diego

0.044%

0.0359095%
City
El. Ca'on
San Diego

0.113%

0.0933582%
City
Encinitas
San Diego

0.061%

0.074%

0.0630289%
City
Escondido
San Diego

0.1.45%

0.11.92204%
City
Imperial Beach
San Diego

0.014%

0.0118283%
City
La Mesa
San Diego

0.055%

0.068%

0.0575593%
City
Lemon Grove
San Diego

0.022%

0.0183911%
City
National City
San Diego

0.080%

0.0656808%
City
Oceanside
San Diego

0.213%

0.1753428%
City
Poway
San Diego

0.062%
0M511040%
City
San Diego
San Diego

1.975%

2.416%

2.0531169%
City
San Marcos
San Diego

0.089%

0.0733897%
City
Santee
San Diego

0.033%

0.0268401%
City
Solana Beach
San Diego

0.017%

0.0138564%
City
Vista
San Diego

0.052%

0.0425144%
Consolidated
San Francisco
San Francisco

3.026%

3.702%

3.1457169%
County
San Joaquin County
San Joacuin

1.680%

2.055%

1.7460399%
City
Lathro 1
San Joacuin

0.009%

0.0075394%
City
Lodi
San Joacuin

0.053%

0.0439484%
City
Manteca
San Joacuin

0.054%

0.0443454%
City
Rilon
San Joacuin

0.013%

0.0104219%
City
Stockton
San Joacuin

0.313%

0.383%

0.3256176%
City
Tracy
San Joacuin

0.084%

0.0692047%
County
San Luis Obispo County
San Luis Obispo

0.816%

0.999%

0.84841.26%
City
Arroyo Grande
San Luis Obis 30

0.024%

0.0199053%
City
Atascadero
San Luis Obispo

0.029%
0M240680%
11of15
Exhibit 10 444

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
Conn ty
Abatement
Percentage Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
E1 Paso de Robles (Paso Robles)
San Luis Obispo

0.043%

0.0353456%
City
Grover Beach
San Luis Obispo

0.017%
0M137881%
City
Morro Bay
San Luis Obispo

0.020%

0.0160922%
City
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo

0.077%
0M637841%
County
San Mateo County
San Mateo

1.074%

1.313%

1.1159599%
City
Belmont
San. Mateo

0.021%
0M169860%
City
Burlingame
San Mateo

0.019%

0.0152537%
City
Daly City
San. Mateo

0.044%

0.0363880%
City
East Palo Alto
San Mateo

0.013%

0.0103982%
City
Foster City
San. Mateo

0.020%

0.01.66101%
City
Half Moon Bay
San Mateo

0.004%

0.0031638%
City
Hillsborough
San. Mateo

0.013%
0M110029%
City
Menlo Park
San Mateo

0.015%

0.0126209%
City
Millbrae
San Mateo

0.013%

0.01.05836%
City
Pacifica
San Mateo

0.016%

0.0130625%
City
Redwood City
San Mateo

0.056%
0M463511%
City
San Bruno
San Mateo

0.021%

0.0172161%
City
San. Carlos
San Mateo

0.013%

0.0108885%
City
San Mateo
San Mateo

0.052%

0.0425841%
City
South San Francisco
San Mateo

0.043%

0.0353943%
County
Santa Barbara County
Santa Barbara

1.132%

1.385%

1.1768968%
City
Carpinteria
Santa Barbara

0.001%

0.0008938%
City
Goleta
Santa Barbara

0.004%

0.0028969%
City
Lom Doc
Santa Barbara

0.047%

0.0389379%
City
Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara

0.122%

0.1004559%
City
Santa Maria
Santa Barbara

0.058%

0.0479179%
County
Santa Clara County
Santa Clara

2.404%

2.941%

2.4987553%
City
Cam Dbell
Santa Clara

0.014%
0M112566%
City
Culertino
Santa Clara

0.008%

0.0066824%
City
Gilroy
Santa Clara

0.025%
0M202891%
12 of 15
Exhibit 10 445

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
Los Altos
Santa Clara

0.013%

0.0103338%
City
Los Gatos
Santa Clara

0.013%

0.0103220%
City
Milpitas
Santa Clara

0.036%

0.0298120%
City
Morgan Hill
Santa Clara

0.015%

0.0124619%
City
Mountain View
Santa Clara

0.041%

0.0334608%
City
Palo Alto
Santa Clara

0.039%

0.0323080%
City
San Jose
Santa Clara

0.294%

0.360%

0.3054960%
City
Santa Clara
Santa Clara

0.067%

0.0549723%
City
Saratoga
Santa Clara

0.004%

0.0034161%
City
Sunnyvale
Santa Clara

0.053%

0.0434069%
County
Santa Cruz County
Santa Cruz

0.783%

0.957%

0.8135396%
City
Capitola
Santa Cruz

0.020%

0.0168191%
City
Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz

0.143%

0.1180348%
City
Scotts Valley
Santa Cruz

0.015%

0.0126525%
City
Watsonville
Santa Cruz

0.063%

0.0520136%
County
Shasta County
Shasta

1.095%

1.339%

1.1380191%
City
Anderson
Shasta

0.024%

0.0198896%
City
Redding
Shasta

0.284%

0.2334841%
City
Shasta Lake
Shasta

0.004%

0.0031993%
County
Siskiyou County
Siskiyou

0.228%

0.279%

0.2373393%
County
Solano County
Solano

0.760%

0.6260795%
City
Benicia
Solano

0.031%

0.0253903%
City
Dixon
Solano

0.016%

0.0130849%
City
Fairfield
Solano

0.109%

0.0897317%
City
Suisun City
Solano

0.021%

0.0176183%
City
Vacaville
Solano

0.119%

0.0976497%
City
Valle.°
Solano

0.167%

0.1373644%
County
Sonoma County
Sonoma

1.218%

1.490%

1.2661290%
City
Healdsburg
Sonoma

0.032%

0.0266929%
City
Petaluma
Sonoma

0.081%

0.0667507%
13 of 15
Exhibit 10 446

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
Rohnert Park
Sonoma

0.041%

0.0340759%
City
Santa Rosa
Sonoma

0.184%

0.1519070%
City
Sonoma
Sonoma

0.022%

0.0183438%
City
Windsor
Sonoma

0.016%

0.0129298%
County
Stanislaus County
Stanislaus

1.722%

1.4182273%
City
Ceres
Stanislaus

0.041%

0.0340260%
City
Modesto
Stanislaus

0.217%

0.1788759%
City
Newman
Stanislaus

0.006%

0.0046964%
City
Oakdale
Stanislaus

0.018%

0.0145531%
City
Patterson
Stanislaus

0.015%

0.0126590%
City
Riverbank
Stanislaus

0.010%

0.0085699%
City
Turlock
Stanislaus

0.065%

0.0531966%
County
Sutter County
Sutter

0.306%

0.374%

0.3179548%
City
Yuba City
Sutter

0.074%

0.0606242%
County
Tehama County
Tehama

0.213%

0.261%

0.2216654%
City
Red Bluff
Tehama

0.014%

0.0117771%
County
Trinity County
Trinity

0.082%

0.101%

0.0855476%
County
Tulare County
Tulare

0.809%

0.990%

0.8410949%
City
Dinuba
Tulare

0.014%

0.0116929%
City
Exeter
Tulare

0.004%

0.0032479%
City
Farmersville
Tulare

0.003%

0.0027879%
City
Lindsay
Tulare

0.007%

0.0057111%
City
Porterville
Tulare

0.021%

0.0171845%
City
Tulare
Tulare

0.037%

0.0302273%
City
Visalia
Tulare

0.066%

0.0545872%
County
Tuolumne County
Tuolumne

0.486%

0.594%

0.5047621 %
County
Ventura County
Ventura

2.192%

2.681%

2.2781201%
City
Camarillo
Ventura

0.002%

0.0012815%
City
Fillmore
Ventura

0.002%

0.0020294%
City
Moorpark
Ventura

0.008%

0.0067337%
14 of 15
Exhibit 10 447

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
Conn ty
Abatement
Percentage Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
Oxnard
Ventura

0.156%

0.190%

0.1617338%
City
Port Hueneme
Ventura

0.021%
0M174145%
City
San Buenaventura (Ventura)
Ventura

0.085%

0.0702181%
City
Santa Paula
Ventura

0.014%
0M119072%
City
Simi Valley
Ventura

0.065%

0.0533043%
City
Thousand Oaks
Ventura

0.022%

0.01.79902%
County
Yolo County
Yolo

0.357%

0.437%

0.3713319%
City
Davis
Yolo

0.055%

0.0451.747%
City
West Sacramento
Yolo

0.066%

0.0544321%
City
Woodland
Yolo

0.058%

0.0477904%
County
Yuba County
Yuba

0.214%

0.262%

0.2225679%
City
Marysville
Yuba

0.014%

0.01.1.2079%
15 of 15
Exhibit 10 448

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 2
Cost Reimbursement Procedure
. Additional defined terms:
a) Costs means the reasonable amounts paid for the attorney and other City Attorney and County Counsel staff time for individuals employed by a Plaintiff Subdivision at the contractual rate, inclusive of benefits and overhead, together with amounts paid for court reporters, experts, copying, electronic research, travel, vendors, and the like, which were not previously reimbursed and which were paid or incurred (i) prior to December 31, 2022 in litigation against any Opioid Defendant and/or (ii) in negotiating and drafting any CA Allocation Agreement(s) concerning a settlement with any Opioid Defendant(s).

Costs does not include attorneys' fees, costs, or expenses incurred by private contingency fee counsel. No part of the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be used to reimburse Costs.
b) First Claims Date means October 1, 2023 or when all applications for reimbursement of Costs, in whole or in part, from funds available under Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, Section XIV and Exhibit R of the Teva Settlement Agreement, Section XIII and Exhibit R of the Allergan Settlement Agreement, Section X and Exhibit R of the Distributor Settlement Agreement, Section XI and Exhibit R of the Janssen Settlement Agreement, Section X and Exhibit R of the CVS Settlement Agreement, or Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walmart Settlement Agreement, have been finally determined under the provisions of those agreements, whichever comes first.
c) Special Master means a retired judicial officer or former public lawyer, not presently employed or retained by a Plaintiff Subdivision, who will aggregate, review, and determine the reasonable Costs to be awarded to each Plaintiff Subdivision that submits a claim for reimbursement of Costs. The Special Master will be selected by a majority vote of the votes cast by Plaintiff Subdivisions, with each such subdivision having one vote. d) Plaintiff Subdivision Committee means the committee of Plaintiff Subdivisions that will review and approve the invoices submitted by the Special Master reflecting his or her reasonable time and expenses.

2. Cost Reimbursement to Plaintiff Subdivision
a) Purpose. Substantial resources have been expended to hold Opioid Defendants accountable for creating and profiting from the opioid crisis, and this effort has been a significant catalyst in creating National Opioid Settlements with various manufacturers, distributors, and chain pharmacies.
b) Claims Procedure.
i. If a Plaintiff Subdivision is eligible to seek reimbursement of Costs, in whole or in part, from funds available under Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walgreens 0 ;. 0 Exhibit 10 449

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO Settlement Agreement, Section XIV and Exhibit R of the Teva Settlement Agreement, Section XIII and Exhibit R of the Allergan Settlement Agreement, Section X and Exhibit R of the CVS Settlement Agreement, Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walmart Settlement Agreement, Section X or Exhibit R of the Distributor Settlement Agreement, or Section XI or Exhibit R of the Janssen Settlement Agreement, it must first make a timely application for reimbursement from such funds. To allow sufficient time for determination of those applications, no claim for Costs to the CA Subdivision Fund under this Agreement may be made before the First Claims Date.
ii. A Plaintiff Subdivision that wishes to be reimbursed from the CA Subdivision Fund must submit a claim to the Special. Master no later than forty-five (45) days after the First Claims Date. The Special Master will then compile and redistribute the aggregated claim totals for each Plaintiff Subdivision via email to representatives of all the Plaintiff Subdivisions. A claim for attorney and staff time must list, for each attorney or staff member included in the claim, the following information: name, title, total hours claimed, hourly rate (including, if sought, benefits and share of overhead), and narrative summarizing the general nature of the work performed by the attorney or staff member. For reimbursement of "hard" costs, the subdivision may aggregate across a category (e.g., total for travel costs). It is the intention of the Plaintiff Subdivisions that submission of documents related to reimbursement of Costs does not waive any attorney -client privilege or exemptions to the California Public Records Act.
iii. The Special Master may request, at his or her sole option, additional documents or details to assist in the final award of Costs.
iv. The Special Master will review claims for reasonableness and will notify each Plaintiff Subdivision of the final determination of its claim, and will provide a list of all final awards to all Plaintiff Subdivisions by email or, upon request, via First Class U.S. Mail. Any Plaintiff Subdivision may ask the Special Master to reconsider any final award within twenty-one (21) days. The Special Master will make a final determination on any such reconsideration request within thirty (30) days of receipt.
v. Any decision of the Special Master is final and binding, and will be considered under the California Arbitration Act, Code of Civil Procedure section 1280 et seq. as a final arbitration award. Nothing in this agreement is intended to expand the scope of judicial review of the final award for errors of fact or law, and the Parties agree that they may only seek to vacate the award if clear and convincing evidence demonstrates one of the factors set forth in Code of Civil Procedure, section 1286.2, subdivision (a). Plaintiff Subdivisions will have fourteen (14) days after all final awards are made, together with any final determination of a request for Exhibit 10 4 0

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO reconsideration, to seek review in the Superior Court of California, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 1285, where the State has filed its Consent Judgment. vi. The Special Master will prepare a report of Costs that includes his or her fees and expenses at least ninety (90) days before the Payment Date for each Annual Payment. The Special Master's preparation of a report of Costs does not discharge a Plaintiff Subdivision's reporting requirement under Section V(B)(2) of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement.
vii. A member of the Plaintiff Subdivision Committee, which is a CA Participating Subdivision, will submit to the Settlement Fund Administrator and Walgreens a report of the fees and expenses incurred by the Special Master pursuant to Section V(B)(2) of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement.
c) Claims Priority and Limitation.

The Special Master will submit invoices for compensation of reasonable fees and expenses to the Plaintiff Subdivision Committee no later than ninety (90) days prior to the Payment Date for each Annual Payment. The Plaintiff Subdivision Committee will promptly review and, if reasonable, approve the Special Master's invoice for compensation. The Plaintiff Subdivision. Committee will submit approved invoices to the Settlement Fund Administrator for payment. The Special Master's approved invoices have priority and will be paid first from the CA Subdivision Fund before any award of Costs, subject to the limitation in Section

2.c.v below.
ii. Final Awards of Costs that do not exceed seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000.00) will be paid next in priority after the Special Master's approved invoices.
iii. Final Awards of Costs in excess of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000.00) will be paid proportionally from the funds remaining in that year's Annual Payment. iv. Any claim for Costs that is not paid in full will be allocated against the next year's distribution from the CA Subdivision Fund, until all approved claims for Costs are paid in full.
v. In no event will more than 50% of the total CA Subdivision Fund received in any year be used to pay Costs or the Special Master's approved invoices. vi. In no event shall more than $28 million of the total CA Subdivision Funds paid pursuant to the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, Teva Settlement Agreement, Allergan Settlement Agreement, Distributor Settlement Agreement, CVS Settlement Agreement, Janssen Settlement Agreement, and the Walmart Settlement Agreement be used to pay Costs.

Exhibit 10 4 1

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO d) Collateral Source Payments and Third -Party Settlement.

In the event a Plaintiff Subdivision is awarded compensation, in whole or in part, by any source of funds created as a result of litigation against an Opioid Defendant for its reasonable Costs, it will reduce its claim for Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund by that amount. If a Plaintiff Subdivision has already received a final award of Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund, it will repay the fund up to the prior award of Costs via a payment to the Settlement Fund Administrator or notify the Settlement Fund Administrator that its allocation from the next and subsequent Annual Payments should be reduced accordingly. If the Plaintiff Subdivision is repaying any prior award of Costs, that repayment will occur as soon as is feasible after the Plaintiff Subdivision's receipt of Cost funds from the collateral source, but no more than 90 days after its receipt from the collateral source. The Settlement Fund Administrator will add any repaid Costs to the CA Subdivision Fund. Any Plaintiff Subdivision that has submitted for reimbursement to any national fund and has not received a final determination by the First Claims Date may request that the settlement administrator withhold some or all of its payment from the CA Subdivision Fund in order to avoid repayment.
ii. In the event a Plaintiff Subdivision reaches a monetary settlement or compromise against any Opioid Defendant outside of the National Opioid Settlement, the monetary portion of such settlement, net of fees paid to outside contingency fee counsel and of funds earmarked strictly for abatement, will be credited against its Costs and the subdivision will be ineligible to recover those credited Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund. Plaintiff Subdivisions negotiating monetary settlements or compromises against any Opioid Defendant outside of the National Opioid Settlement will negotiate for funds to repay any Costs it previously received from the CA Subdivision Fund or for Costs it otherwise might be eligible to claim from the CA Subdivision Fund. If such a settlement is paid after all final approved claims for Costs by all Plaintiff Subdivisions are satisfied in full, the settling subdivision will reimburse the CA Subdivision Fund in that amount by making payment to the Settlement Fund Administrator to add to the CA Subdivision Fund in a manner consistent with the repayments described in section 2.d.i above.

Exhibit 10 4 2

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 3

CALIFORNIA -SUBDIVISION BACKSTOP AGREEMENT
On August 6, 2021, Judge Polster of the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio issued an Order (the Order), docket number 3814, in In Re National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL 2804, addressing contingent attorney fee contracts between political. subdivisions eligible to participate in the Walgreens Settlement and their counsel.

In light of the Order, and at the request of [SUBDIVISION], the [SUBDIVISION], its counsel. [COUNSEL], and the California Attorney General, on behalf of the State of California, are entering into this California -Subdivision Backstop Agreement (Backstop Agreement). [SUBDIVISION] and [COUNSEL] intend this Backstop Agreement to constitute a State Back - Stop Agreement as that term is used in the Order and in Exhibit R (Agreement on Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Expenses) of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement.

Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, [SUBDIVISION] may, subject to the limitations of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement and CA Walgreens Allocation Agreement, as well as any other limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the Walgreens Settlement CA Subdivision Fund to pay a contingent fee to [COUNSEL]. Any such payment from [SUBDIVISION] to [COUNSEL], together with any contingency fees that [COUNSEL] may receive from the national Attorney Fee Fund, will not exceed a total contingency fee of [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED 15%] of the total gross recovery of [SUBDIVISION] from the Walgreens Settlement.
[COUNSEL] certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund created under the Walgreens Settlement Agreement before seeking or accepting payment under this backstop agreement. [COUNSEL] further certify that they are not seeking and will not accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of "State Back - Stop Agreement" in Exhibit R of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to be between "a Settling State" and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does not require the payment of any state funds to [SUBDIVISION], [COUNSEL], or any other party.
[DATE]
[DATE]
[DATE]
[SUBDIVISION SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[COUNSEL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
Exhibit 10 4 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO Proposed California State -Subdivision Agreement
Regarding Distribution and Use of
Settlement Funds — Walmart Settlement
Introduction
Pursuant to the Walmart Settlement Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2022, and any revision thereto (the "Walmart Settlement Agreement"), including Section V and Exhibit O, the State of California proposes this agreement (the "CA Walmart Allocation Agreement") to govern the allocation, distribution, and use of Settlement Fund payments made to California pursuant to Sections IV and V of the Walmart Settlement Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not apply to payments made pursuant to Sections VIII or IX of the Walmart Settlement Agreement.

Pursuant to Exhibit O, Paragraph 4, of the Walmart Settlement Agreement, acceptance of this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement is a requirement to be a Participating Subdivision.

2. Definitions
a) CA Participating Subdivision means a Participating Subdivision that is also (a) a Plaintiff Subdivision and/or (b) a Primary Subdivision with a population equal to or greater than 10,000. For the avoidance of doubt, eligible CA Participating Subdivisions are those California subdivisions listed in Exhibit C (excluding Litigating Special Districts) and/or Exhibit I to the Walmart Settlement Agreement. b) Allergan Settlement Agreement means the Allergan Settlement Agreement dated November 22, 2022, and any revision thereto.
c) CVS Settlement Agreement means the CVS Settlement Agreement dated December 9, 2022, and any revision thereto as well as any modification thereto entered into by the State of California and CVS.
d) Distributor Settlement Agreement means the Distributor Settlement Agreement dated July 21, 2021, and any revision thereto.
e) Janssen Settlement Agreement means the Janssen Settlement Agreement dated July 21, 2021, and any revision thereto.
f) Teva Settlement Agreement means the Teva Settlement Agreement dated November 22, 2022, and any revision thereto.

Walgreens Settlement Agreement means the Walgreens Settlement Agreement dated December 9, 2022, and any revision thereto.
h) CA Litigating Special District means a Litigating Special District located in California. CA Litigating Special Districts include Downey Unified School District, Ells Grove Unified School District, Kern High School District, Montezuma Fire Protection District (located in Stockton, California), Santa Barbara San Luis Obispo Regional Health Authority, Inland Empire Health Plan, Health Plan of San Joaquin, San Leandro Unified School District, Pleasant Valley School District Board, and LA Care Health Plan.
g)
Exhibit 11 4 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO j)
i) Plaintiff Subdivision means a Subdivision located in California, other than a CA Litigating Special District, that filed a lawsuit, on behalf of the Subdivision and/or through an official of the Subdivision on behalf of the People of the State of California, against one or more Opioid Defendants prior to October 1, 2020.

Opioid Defendant means any defendant (including but not limited to Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Allergan Finance, LLC, Allergan Limited, CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Walgreen Co., Walmart Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Cardinal Health, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation, and McKesson Corporation) named in a lawsuit seeking damages, abatement, or other remedies related to or caused by the opioid public health crisis in any lawsuit brought by any state or local government on or before October 1, 2020.

3. General Terms
This agreement is subject to the requirements of the Walmart Settlement Agreement, as well as applicable law, and the Walmart Settlement Agreement governs over any inconsistent provision of this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement. Terms used in this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement have the same meaning as in the Walmart Settlement Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.

Pursuant to Section V(D)(1) of the Walmart Settlement Agreement, (a) all Settlement Fund payments will be used for Opioid Remediation, except as allowed by Section V(B)(2) of the Walmart Settlement Agreement; and (b) at least seventy percent (70%) of Settlement Fund payment amounts will be used solely for future Opioid Remediation.

4. State Allocation
The Settlement Fund payments to California,' pursuant to the Walmart Settlement Agreement, shall be allocated as follows: 15% to the State Fund; 70% to the Abatement Accounts Fund; and 15% to the Subdivision Fund. For the avoidance of doubt, all funds allocated to California from the Settlement Fund shall be combined pursuant to this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement, and 15% of that total shall be allocated to the State of California (the "State of California Allocation"), 70% to the California Abatement Accounts Fund ("CA Abatement Accounts Fund"), and 15% to the California Subdivision Fund ("CA Subdivision Fund").

For purposes of clarity, use of the term "California" refers to the geographic territory of California and the state and its local governments therein. The term "State" or "State of California" refers to the State of California as a governmental unit.

Exhibit 11 455

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO A. State of California Allocation
Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the State and used by the State for future Opioid Remediation.

B. CA Abatement Accounts Fund
i. Allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) Seventy percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA Abatement Accounts Fund. The funds in the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be allocated based on the allocation model developed in connection with the proposed negotiating class in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804), as adjusted to reflect only those cities and counties that are eligible, based on population or litigation status, to become a CA Participating Subdivision. The percentage from the CA Abatement Accounts Fund allocated to each CA Participating Subdivision is set forth in Appendix 1 in the column entitled abatement percentage (the "Local Allocation"). For the avoidance of doubt, CA Litigating Special Districts and California towns, cities, and counties with a population less than 10,000 are not eligible to receive an allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds.
b) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a county, or a city and county, will be allocated its Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision, and will receive payments as provided in the Walmart Settlement Agreement. c) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a city will be allocated its Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision. The Local Allocation share for a city that is a CA Participating Subdivision will be paid to the county in which the city is located, rather than to the city, so long as: (a) the county is a CA Participating Subdivision, and (b) the city has not advised the Settlement Fund Administrator that it requests direct payment at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. A Local Allocation share allocated to a city but paid to a county is not required to be spent exclusively for abatement activities in that city, but will become part of the county's share of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds, which will be used in accordance with Section 4.B.ii (Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds) and reported on in accordance with Section 4.B.iii (CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight).
d) A city within a county that is a CA Participating Subdivision may opt in or out of direct payment at any time, and it may also elect direct payment of only a portion of its share, with the remainder going to the county, by providing notice to the Settlement Fund Administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. For purposes of this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement, the Cities of Los Angeles, Oakland, San Diego, San Jose and Eureka will be deemed to have elected direct payment if they become Participating Subdivisions.

Exhibit 11 46

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO e) The State will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision.
f) Funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision, and not expended or encumbered within five years of receipt and in accordance with the Walmart Settlement Agreement and this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement shall be transferred to the State; provided however, that CA Participating Subdivisions have seven years to expend or encumber CA Abatement Accounts Funds designated to support capital outlay projects before they must be transferred to the State. This provision shall not apply to the Cost Reimbursement Funds, which shall be controlled by Appendix 2.
ii. Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) The CA Abatement Accounts Funds will be used for future Opioid Remediation in one or more of the areas described in the List of Opioid Remediation Uses, which is Exhibit E to the Walmart Settlement Agreement.
b) In addition to this requirement, no less than 50% of the funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision from the Abatement Accounts Fund in each calendar year will be used for one or more of the following High Impact Abatement Activities:
(1) the provision of matching funds or operating costs for substance use disorder facilities within the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program; (2) creating new or expanded Substance Use Disorder ("SUD") treatment infrastructure; (3) addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted by SUD;
(4) diversion of people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, including by providing training and resources to first and early responders (sworn and non -sworn) and implementing best practices for outreach, diversion and deflection, employability, restorative justice, and harm reduction; and/or (5) interventions to prevent drug addiction in vulnerable youth. c) The California Department of Health Care Services ("DHCS") may add to this list (but not delete from it) by designating additional High Impact Abatement Activities. DHCS will make reasonable efforts to consult with stakeholders, including the CA Participating Subdivisions, before adding additional High Impact Abatement Activities to this list.
d) For the avoidance of doubt, and subject to the requirements of the Walmart Settlement Agreement and applicable law, CA Participating Subdivisions may foiun agreements or ventures, or otherwise work in collaboration with, federal, state, local, tribal or private sector entities in pursuing Opioid Remediation activities funded from the CA Abatemeni Exhibit 11 47

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO Accounts Fund. Further, provided that all CA Abatement Accounts Funds are used for Opioid Remediation consistent with the Walmart Settlement Agreement and this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement, a county and any cities or towns within the county may agree to reallocate their respective shares of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds among themselves, provided that any direct distribution may only be to a CA Participating Subdivision and any CA Participating Subdivision must agree to their share being reallocated.
iii. CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight
a) Pursuant to Section 5 below, CA Participating Subdivisions receiving settlement funds must prepare and file reports annually regarding the use of those funds. DHCS may regularly review the reports prepared by CA Participating Subdivisions about the use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds for compliance with the Walmart Settlement Agreement and this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement.
b) If DHCS determines that a CA Participating Subdivision's use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds is inconsistent with the Walmart Settlement Agreement or this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement, whether through review of reports or information from any other sources, DHCS shall send a request to meet and confer with the CA Participating Subdivision. The parties shall meet and confer in an effort to resolve the concern.
c) If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, DHCS may conduct an audit of the Subdivision's use of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds within one year of the request to meet and confer, unless the parties mutually agree in writing to extend the meet and confer time frame.
d) If the concern still cannot be resolved, the State may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to resolve the concern or otherwise enforce the requirements of the Walmart Settlement Agreement or this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement. However, in no case shall any audit be conducted, or motion be brought, as to a specific expenditure of funds, more than five years after the date on which the expenditure of the funds was reported to DHCS, in accordance with this agreement.
e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement does not limit the statutory or constitutional authority of any state or local agency or official to conduct audits, investigations, or other oversight activities, or to pursue administrative, civil, or criminal enforcement actions.

Exhibit 11
4%8

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO C. CA Subdivision Fund
Fifteen percent of the total Settlement Fund payments will be allocated to the CA Subdivision Fund. All funds in the CA Subdivision Fund will be allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Participating Subdivisions. The funds will be used, subject to any limits imposed by the Walmart Settlement Agreement and this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement, to fund future Opioid Remediation and reimburse past opioid- related expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation, and to pay the reasonable fees and expenses of the Special Master as set forth in Appendix 2.

The CA Subdivision Funds will be allocated as follows:
a) First, funds in the CA Subdivision Fund shall be used to pay the Special Master's reasonable fees and expenses in accordance with the procedures and limitations set forth in Appendix 2 to this document;
b) Second, funds will be allocated to Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Participating Subdivisions that have been awarded Costs, as defined by and in accordance with the procedures and limitations set forth in Appendix 2 to this document. c) Funds remaining in the CA Subdivision Fund, which shall consist of no less than 50% of the total CA Subdivision Fund received in any year pursuant to Appendix 2, Section 2.c.v, will be distributed to Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Participating Subdivisions, in relative proportion to the Local Allocation. These funds shall be used to fund future opioid-related projects and to reimburse past opioid-related expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation against any Opioid Defendant.

D. Provision for State Back -Stop Agreement
On August 6, 2021, Judge Dan Polster of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, issued an order (ECF Docket Number 3814) ("MDL Fees Order") in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804) "cap[ping] all applicable contingent fee agreements at 15%." Private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions should seek its contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds under the Walmart Settlement Agreement, and, if applicable, the Allergan Settlement Agreement, CVS Settlement Agreement, Distributor Settlement Agreement, Janssen Settlement Agreement, Teva Settlement Agreement, and Walgreens Settlement Agreement.

A Plaintiff Subdivision may separately agree to use its share of the CA Subdivision Fund to pay for fees or costs incurred by its contingency -fee counsel ("State Back -Stop Agreement"), pursuant to Exhibit R, section I(W), of the Walmart Settlement Agreement and the MDL Fees Order, so long as such contingency fees do not exceed a total contingency fee of 15% of the total gross recovery of the Plaintiff Subdivision pursuant to the Walmart Settlement, inclusive of contingency fees from the national Attorney Fee Fund and this State Back -Stop Agreement.

Before seeking fees or litigation costs and expenses from a State Back -Stop Agreement, private Exhibit 11 49

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions must first seek contingency fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds created under the Walmart Settlement Agreement. Further, private counsel may only seek reimbursement for litigation fees and costs that have not previously been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

To effectuate a State Back -Stop Agreement pursuant to this section, an agreement in the form of Appendix 3 may be entered into by a Plaintiff Subdivision, private counsel, and the California Office of the Attorney General. The California Office of the Attorney General shall, upon the request of a Plaintiff Subdivision, execute any agreement executed by a Plaintiff Subdivision and its private counsel if it is in the foiiii of Appendix 3. The California Office of the Attorney General will also consider requests from Plaintiff Subdivisions to execute and enter into agreements presented in other forms.

For the avoidance of doubt, this agreement does not require a Plaintiff Subdivision to request or enter into a State Back -Stop Agreement, and no State Back -Stop Agreement shall impose any duty or obligation on the State of California or any of its agencies or officers, including without limitation the Attorney General.

5. State and Subdivision Reporting
a) DHCS will prepare an annual written report regarding the State's use of funds from the settlement until those funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will be made publicly available on the DHCS web site.
b) Each CA Participating Subdivision that receives payments of funds from the settlement will prepare written reports at least annually regarding the use of those funds, until those funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will also include a certification that all funds that the CA Participating Subdivision has received through the settlement have been used in compliance with the Walmart Settlement Agreement and this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement. The report will be in a form reasonably determined by DHCS. Prior to specifying the form of the report DHCS will confer with representatives of the Plaintiff Subdivisions.
c) The State and all CA Participating Subdivisions receiving CA Abatement Accounts Funds will track all deposits and expenditures. Each such subdivision is responsible solely for the CA Abatement Accounts Funds it receives. A county is not responsible for oversight, reporting, or monitoring of CA Abatement Accounts Funds received by a city within that county that receives direct payment. Unless otherwise exempt, Subdivisions' expenditures and uses of CA Abatement Accounts Funds and other Settlement Funds will be subject to the normal budgetary and expenditure process of the Subdivision. d) Each Plaintiff Subdivision receiving CA Subdivision Funds will track all deposits and expenditures, as required by the Walmart Settlement Agreement and this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement. Among other things, Plaintiff Subdivisions using monies from the CA Subdivision Fund for purposes that do not qualify as Opioid Remediation must identify and include in their annual report, the amount and how such funds were used, including if used to pay attorneys' fees, investigation costs, or litigation costs. Pursuant to Section V(B)(2) of the Walmart Settlement Agreement, such information must also be reported to the Settlement Fund Administrator and Walmart.

Exhibit 11 410

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-B55C-4BAB-8EC7-006F26F85FD0 e) In each year in which DHCS prepares an annual report DHCS will also host a meeting to discuss the annual report and the Opioid Remediation activities being carried out by the State and Participating Subdivisions.

6. Miscellaneous
a) The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet and confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated motion or action, and vice versa.
b) Except as provided in the Walmart Settlement Agreement, this CA Walmart Allocation Agreement is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in the CA Walmart Allocation Agreement, if any provision of this agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement, or the application of such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. d) Except as provided in the Walmart Settlement Agreement, this agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.

Exhibit 11
4�1

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO The undersigned, Bell Gardens city, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds — Walmart Settlement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision in the Walmart Settlement and ACCEPTS this Proposed California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds — Walmart Settlement. EXECUTED on Signature:

Name: Michael B. O'Kelly
Title: City Manager
Date: April 10, 2023
Exhibit 11 4%2

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights, releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the California State -Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds Walmart Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not change. Participating Subdivisions, underlying calculations, and the calculated allocation percentages are subject to change.

Regarding the column herein entitled "Abatement Percentage," pursuant to Section 4.B.e., the State of California will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision.

Regarding the column herein entitled "Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage," payments allocated to a Plaintiff Subdivision, which is not an Initial Participating Subdivision, will be re -allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions.

Regarding the column herein entitled "Abatement Percentage," the annotation of "100%" refers to one -hundred percent (100%) of the California Abatement Account Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.B. Regarding the column herein entitled "Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage," the annotation of "100%" refers to one -hundred percent (100%) of the California Subdivision Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.C. Regarding the column herein entitled "Weighted Allocation Percentage," the annotation of "100%" refers to one - hundred percent (100%) of the combined and weighted allocation of the Abatement Percentage and the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage.

Exhibit 11 463

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
100.000% 100.000%
100.000%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Ailcation
Percentage
County
Alameda County
Alameda

2.332%

2.853%

2.4237952%
City
Alameda
Alameda

0.069%

0.0570162%
City
Albany
Alameda

0.013%

0.0107768%
City
Berkeley
Alameda

0.152%

0.1249656%
City
Dublin
Alameda

0.033%

0.040%

0.0338810%
City
Emeryville
Alameda

0.023%

0.0185765%
City
Fremont
Alameda

0.108%

0.0888576%
City
Hayward
Alameda

0.117%

0.0966218%
City
Liveriiiore
Alameda

0.054%

0.0446740%
City
Newark
Alameda

0.026%

0.0217626%
City
Oakland
Alameda

0.486%

0.595%

0.5055601%
City
Piedmont
Alameda

0.014%

0.0114064%
City
Pleasanton
Alameda

0.067%

0.0554547%
City
San Leandro
Alameda

0.039%

0.0321267%
City
Union City
Alameda

0.043%

0.0352484%
County
Amador County
Amador

0.226%

0.277%

0.2349885%
County
Butte County
Butte

1.615%

1.975%

1.6783178%
City
Chico
Butte

0.216%

0.264%

0.2246499%
City
Oroville
Butte

0.079%

0.0646595%
County
Calaveras County
Calaveras

0.226%

0.277%

0.2351644%
County
Colusa County
Colusa

0.059%

0.0489221%
County
Contra Costa County
Contra Costa

2.102%

2.571%

2.1844585%
City
Antioch
Contra Costa

0.037%

0.0301879%
City
Brentwood
Contra Costa

0.026%

0.0215339%
City
Clayton
Contra Costa

0.002%

0.0018060%
City
Concord
Contra Costa

0.055%

0.0456676%
City
Danville
Contra Costa

0.010%

0.0082255%
City
El Cerrito
Contra Costa

0.023%

0.0189024%
City
Hercules
Contra Costa

0.010%

0.0078273%
1 of 15
Exhibit 11 464

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
Lafayette
Contra Costa

0.006%

0.0046030%
City
Martinez
Contra Costa

0.012%

0.0098593%
City
Moraga
Contra Costa

0.004%

0.0031007%
City
Oakley
Contra Costa

0.010%

0.0079416%
City
Orinda
Contra Costa

0.005%

0.0038157%
City
Pinole
Contra Costa

0.013%

0.0110909%
City
Pittsburg
Contra Costa

0.053%

0.0436369%
City
Pleasant Hill
Contra Costa

0.013%

0.0106309%
City
Richmond
Contra Costa

0.146%

0.1201444%
City
San Pablo
Contra Costa

0.018%

0.0148843%
City
San Ramon
Contra Costa

0.021%

0.0176459%
City
Walnut Creek
Contra Costa

0.026%

0.0212132%
County
Del Norte County
Del Norte

0.114%

0.140%

0.1189608%
County
El Dorado County
El Dorado

0.768%

0.939%

0.7980034%
City
Placerville
El Dorado

0.015%

0.0127642%
City
South Lake Tahoe
El Dorado

0.081%

0.0665456%
County
Fresno County
Fresno

1.895%

2.318%

1.9693410%
City
Clovis
Fresno

0.065%

0.0536211%
City
Coalinga
Fresno

0.012%

0.0098554%
City
Fresno
Fresno

0.397%

0.3270605%
City
Kei ian
Fresno

0.005%

0.0042534%
City
Kingsburg
Fresno

0.008%

0.0066167%
City
Mendota
Fresno

0.002%

0.0019387%
City
Orange Cove
Fresno

0.004%

0.0035607%
City
Parlier
Fresno

0.008%

0.0069755%
City
Reedley
Fresno

0.012%

0.0098804%
City
Sanger
Fresno

0.018%

0.0146135%
City
Selma
Fresno

0.015%

0.0127537%
County
Glenn County
Glenn

0.107%

0.131%

0.1116978%
County
Humboldt County
Humboldt

1.030%

1.260%

1.0703185%
2 of 15
Exhibit 11 465

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
Conn ty
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
Arcata
Humboldt

0.054%

0.0447660%
City
Eureka
Humboldt

0.117%

0.1.43%

0.121.6284%
City
Fortuna
Humboldt

0.032%

0.0266837%
County
Imperial County
Imperial

0.258%

0.315%

0.2679006%
City
Brawley
Imperial

0.011%

0.0087986%
City
Calexico
Imperial

0.019%

0.01.52799%
City
El Centro
Imperial

0.158%

0.1302522%
City
Im Derial
Imperial

0.006%

0.0048791%
County
Inyo County
Inyo

0.073%

0.089%

0.0754413%
County
Kern County
Kern

2.517%

3.079%

2.6159145%
City
Arvin
Kern

0.006%

0.0046425%
City
Bakersfield
Kern

0.212%

0.1747198%
City
California City
Kern

0.009%

0.0070820%
City
Delano
Kern

0.030%
0M249316%
City
McFarland
Kern

0.003%

0.0025644%
City
Ridgecrest
Kern

0.015%
0M120938%
City
Shafter
Kern

0.013%

0.0103417%
City
Tehachapi
Kern

0.009%

0.0073580%
City
Wasco
Kern

0.008%

0.0069861%
County
Kings County
Kings

0.293%

0.2413469%
City
Avenal
Kings

0.007%

0.0056335%
City
Corcoran
Kings

0.013%

0.0107032%
City
Hanford
Kings

0.027%

0.0226038%
City
Lemoore
Kings

0.016%

0.0131900%
County
Lake County
Lake

0.795%

0.6545389%
City
Clearlake
Lake

0.041%

0.050%
0M426253%
City
Lakeport
Lake

0.021%

0.026%

0.0222964%
County
Lassen County
Lassen

0.319%

0.391%

0.332061.0%
City
Susanville
Lassen

0.027%

0.0219295%
County
Los Angeles County
Los Angeles

13.896%

16.999%

14.4437559%
3 of 15
Exhibit 11 466

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
Agoura Hills
Los Angeles

0.005%

0.0040024%
City
Alhambra
Los Angeles

0.042%

0.0343309%
City
Arcadia
Los Angeles

0.033%

0.0267718%
City
Artesia
Los Angeles

0.001%

0.0005100%
City
Azusa
Los Angeles

0.026%

0.0210857%
City
Baldwin Park
Los Angeles

0.027%

0.0218520%
City
Bell
Los Angeles

0.008%

0.0068783%
City
Bellflower
Los Angeles

0.002%

0.0014485%
City
Bell Gardens
Los Angeles

0.014%

0.0114301%
City
Beverly Hills
Los Angeles

0.065%

0.0534897%
City
Burbank
Los Angeles

0.100%

0.0823132%
City
Calabasas
Los Angeles

0.006%

0.0048948%
City
Carson
Los Angeles

0.019%

0.0159805%
City
Cerritos
Los Angeles

0.005%

0.0039682%
City
Claremont
Los Angeles

0.010%

0.0082584%
City
Commerce
Los Angeles

0.000%

0.0002971%
City
Compton
Los Angeles

0.044%

0.0361882%
City
Covina
Los Angeles

0.028%

0.0229127%
City
Cudahy
Los Angeles

0.001%

0.0006020%
City
Culver City
Los Angeles

0.055%

0.0449894%
City
Diamond Bar
Los Angeles

0.001%

0.0006993%
City
Downey
Los Angeles

0.052%

0.0429994%
City
Duarte
Los Angeles

0.003%

0.0027261%
City
El Monte
Los Angeles

0.031%

0.038%

0.0318985%
City
El Segundo
Los Angeles

0.033%

0.0268020%
City
Gardena
Los Angeles

0.034%

0.0278088%
City
Glendale
Los Angeles

0.166%

0.1366586%
City
Glendora
Los Angeles

0.016%

0.0134411%
City
Hawaiian Gardens
Los Angeles

0.005%

0.0040549%
City
Hawthorne
Los Angeles

0.050%

0.0407833%
4 of 15
Exhibit 11 467

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
Conn ty
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
AIlcation
Percentage
City
Hen iosa Beach
Los Angeles

0.018%

0.0145307%
City
Huntington Park
Los Angeles

0.023%
0M190667%
City
Inglewood
Los Angeles

0.059%

0.0489195%
City
La Canada Flintridge
Los Angeles

0.003%
0M025565%
City
Lakewood
Los Angeles

0.005%

0.0039971%
City
La Mirada
Los Angeles

0.010%
0M081572%
City
Lancaster
Los Angeles

0.045%

0.0369689%
City
La Puente
Los Angeles

0.002%

0.001.2999%
City
La Verne
Los Angeles

0.024%

0.0194190%
City
Lawndale
Los Angeles

0.002%
0M017731%
City
Lomita
Los Angeles

0.004%

0.0031940%
City
Long Beach
Los Angeles

0.439%

0.361.4151%
City
Los Angeles
Los Angeles

2.715%

3.321%

2.8218811%
City
Lynwood
Los Angeles

0.016%
0M134345%
City
Malibu
Los Angeles

0.002%

0.0019269%
City
Manhattan Beach
Los Angeles

0.032%

0.0260686%
City
Maywood
Los Angeles

0.004%

0.0035528%
City
Monrovia
Los Angeles

0.031%

0.0254455%
City
Montebello
Los Angeles

0.030%

0.0250670%
City
Monterey Park
Los Angeles

0.031%

0.0256677%
City
Norwalk
Los Angeles

0.031%

0.0258228%
City
Palmdale
Los Angeles

0.046%

0.0375827%
City
Palos Verdes Estates
Los Angeles

0.006%

0.0053102%
City
Paramount
Los Angeles

0.011%

0.0091483%
City
Pasadena
Los Angeles

0.146%

0.1200524%
City
Pico Rivera
Los Angeles

0.022%

0.0183333%
City
Pomona
Los Angeles

0.111%

0.0911933%
City
Rancho Palos Verdes
Los Angeles

0.002%
0M012645%
City
Redondo Beach
Los Angeles

0.062%

0.0506992%
City
Rosemead
Los Angeles

0.003%
0M028260%
5 of 15
Exhibit 11 468

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
Conn ty
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
San Dimas
Los Angeles

0.003%

0.0022016%
City
San Fernando
Los Angeles

0.013%
0M104837%
City
San Gabriel
Los Angeles

0.018%

0.0147726%
City
San Marino
Los Angeles

0.009%
0M073791%
City
Santa Clarita
Los Angeles

0.022%

0.0178167%
City
Santa Fe Springs
Los Angeles

0.031%

0.0257531%
City
Santa Monica
Los Angeles

0.158%

0.1298513%
City
Sierra Madre
Los Angeles

0.006%

0.0048646%
City
Signal Hill
Los Angeles

0.010%

0.0084884%
City
South El Monte
Los Angeles

0.005%

0.0039603%
City
South Gate
Los Angeles

0.020%

0.0166272%
City
South Pasadena
Los Angeles

0.012%

0.0095334%
City
Tem ple City
Los Angeles

0.005%

0.0039498%
City
Torrance
Los Angeles

0.1.12%
0M919820%
City
Walnut
Los Angeles

0.006%

0.0047305%
City
West Covina
Los Angeles

0.049%

0.0404521%
City
West Hollywood
Los Angeles

0.013%

0.0108517%
City
Whittier
Los Angeles

0.032%

0.0260581%
County
Madera County
Madera

0.349%

0.427%

0.3630669%
City
Chowchilla
Madera

0.012%

0.0097332%
City
Madera
Madera

0.039%

0.0318441%
County
Marin County
Marin

0.564%

0.690%

0.5861325%
City
Larks3ur
Marin

0.015%

0.0124697%
City
Mill. Valley
Marin

0.020%

0.0168401%
City
Novato
Marin

0.028%

0.0229824%
City
San Ansehno
Marin

0.009%

0.0078062%
City
San Rafael
Marin

0.089%

0.0729823%
County
Mariposa County
Mari Dosa

0.084%

0.103%
0M876131%
County
Mendocino County
Mendocino

0.439%

0.536%

0.4558394%
City
Ukiah
Mendocino

0.039%
0M317153%
6 of 15
Exhibit 11 469

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
County
Merced County
Merced

0.551%

0.674%

0.5724262%
City
Atwater
Merced

0.024%

0.0195846%
City
Livingston
Merced

0.006%

0.0045873%
City
Los Banos
Merced

0.020%

0.0165142%
City
Merced
Merced

0.061%

0.0500762%
County
Modoc County
Modoc

0.065%

0.080%

0.0678250%
County
Mono County
Mono

0.023%

0.029%

0.0242606%
County
Monterey County
Monterey

0.908%

1.1.11 %

0.9437083%
City
Greenfield
Monterey

0.006%

0.0050552%
City
King City
Monterey

0.005%

0.0037355%
City
Marina
Monterey

0.017%

0.0144098%
City
Monterey
Monterey

0.041%

0.0336540%
City
Pacific Grove
Monterey

0.009%

0.0074842%
City
Salinas
Monterey

0.094%

0.0776576%
City
Seaside
Monterey

0.023%

0.0191772%
City
Soledad
Monterey

0.007%

0.0060870%
County
Napa County
Na la

0.288%

0.352%

0.2994325%
City
American Canyon
Na la

0.017%

0.0136869%
City
Napa
Na la

0.078%

0.0642783%
County
Nevada County
Nevada

0.441%

0.539%

0.4579827%
City
Grass Valley
Nevada

0.024%

0.0197805%
City
Truckee
Nevada

0.003%

0.0023843%
County
Orange County
Orange

4.364%

5.339%

4.5363576%
City
Aliso Vic'o
Orange

0.014%

0.0113841%
City
Anaheim
Orange

0.554%

0.678%

0.5759282%
City
Brea
Orange

0.086%

0.0708897%
City
Buena Park
Orange

0.087%

0.0714352%
City
Costa Mesa
Orange

0.124%

0.152%

0.1288366%
City
Cypress
Orange

0.033%

0.0271937%
City
Dana Point
Orange

0.001%

0.0005560%
7 of 15
Exhibit 11 470

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
Fountain Valley
Orange

0.055%

0.0455980%
City
Fullerton
Orange

0.137%

0.168%

0.1425744%
City
Garden Grove
Orange

0.213%

0.1752482%
City
Huntington Beach
Orange

0.247%

0.302%

0.2568420%
City
Irvine
Orange

0.139%

0.170%

0.1442350%
City
Laguna Beach
Orange

0.047%

0.058%

0.0493043%
City
Laguna Hills
Orange

0.014%

0.0115457%
City
Laguna Niguel
Orange

0.001%

0.0007071%
City
Laguna Woods
Orange

0.001%

0.0006546%
City
La Habra
Orange

0.060%

0.073%

0.0621049%
City
Lake Forest
Orange

0.012%

0.0101249%
City
La Palma
Orange

0.012%

0.0095439%
City
Los Alamitos
Orange

0.008%

0.0069190%
City
Mission Vie'o
Orange

0.014%

0.0117560%
City
Newport Beach
Orange

0.179%

0.1470134%
City
Orange
Orange

0.150%

0.1231320%
City
Placentia
Orange

0.029%

0.035%

0.0298912%
City
Rancho Santa Margarita
Orange

0.001%

0.0006296%
City
San Clemente
Orange

0.008%

0.010%

0.0086083%
City
San Juan Capistrano
Orange

0.008%

0.0065510%
City
Santa Ana
Orange

0.502%

0.614%

0.5213866%
City
Seal Beach
Orange

0.020%

0.0165891%
City
Stanton
Orange

0.035%

0.0291955%
City
Tustin
Orange

0.073%

0.0600341%
City
Westminster
Orange

0.104%

0.127%

0.1082721%
City
Yorba Linda
Orange

0.044%

0.0362223%
County
Placer County
Placer

1.045%

1.278%

1.0861002%
City
Auburn
Placer

0.017%

0.0141114%
City
Lincoln
Placer

0.031%

0.0255599%
City
Rocklin
Placer

0.076%

0.0625485%
8 of 15
Exhibit 11
471

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
Conn ty
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
Roseville
Placer

0.196%

0.1616559%
County
Plumas County
Plumas

0.205%

0.251%

0.2128729%
County
Riverside County
Riverside

4.534%

5.547%

4.7128296%
City
Banning
Riverside

0.017%
0M143848%
City
Beaumont
Riverside

0.021%

0.0171135%
City
Blythe
Riverside

0.012%
0M096714%
City
Canyon Lake
Riverside

0.000%

0.0001761%
City
Cathedral. City
Riverside

0.067%

0.0553614%
City
Coachella
Riverside

0.021%

0.0173054%
City
Corona
Riverside

0.1.47%

0.1.207083%
City
Desert Hot S brings
Riverside

0.024%

0.0200433%
City
Eastvale
Riverside

0.000%

0.0002747%
City
Hemet
Riverside

0.051%

0.0421792%
City
Indio
Riverside

0.056%

0.0457794%
City
Juru pa Valley
Riverside

0.001%

0.0008991%
City
Lake Elsinore
Riverside

0.021%

0.0172949%
City
La Quinta
Riverside

0.063%

0.0516732%
City
Menifee
Riverside

0.032%

0.0260909%
City
Moreno Valley
Riverside

0.137%

0.1130348%
City
Murrieta
Riverside

0.048%

0.059%

0.0497423%
City
Norco
Riverside

0.016%

0.0134542%
City
Palm Desert
Riverside

0.083%

0.0682465%
City
Palm Springs
Riverside

0.076%

0.0629862%
City
Perris
Riverside

0.009%

0.0076774%
City
Rancho Mirage
Riverside

0.052%

0.0431098%
City
Riverside
Riverside

0.268%

0.2206279%
City
San Jacinto
Riverside

0.010%

0.0085936%
City
Temecula
Riverside

0.022%
0M180086%
City
Wildomar
Riverside

0.008%

0.0062500%
County
Sacramento County
Sacramento

3.797%

4.645%

3.9465887%
9 of 15
Exhibit 11 472

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
Conn ty
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
Citrus Heights
Sacramento

0.057%

0.0465312%
City
Elk Grove
Sacramento

0.130%

0.1066994%
City
Folsom
Sacramento

0.108%

0.0890850%
City
Galt
Sacramento

0.017%
0M143704%
City
Rancho Cordova
Sacramento

0.008%

0.0067679%
City
Sacramento
Sacramento

0.721%

0.882%

0.7496530%
County
San Benito County
San Benito

0.106%

0.130%

0.1101417%
City
Hollister
San Benito

0.027%

0.0225355%
County
San Bernardino County
San Bernardino

3.259%

3.987%

3.3878124%
City
Adelanto
San Bernardino

0.008%

0.0066640%
City
A 1 ple Valley
San Bernardino

0.025%

0.0207360%
City
Barstow
San Bernardino

0.015%

0.0122056%
City
Chino
San Bernardino

0.064%

0.0525893%
City
Chino Hills
San Bernardino

0.001%

0.0006388%
City
Colton
San Bernardino

0.031%

0.0253443%
City
Fontana
San Bernardino

0.1.12%

0.0920543%
City
Grand Terrace
San Bernardino

0.006%

0.0051051%
City
Hesperia
San. Bernardino

0.035%

0.0291522%
City
Highland
San Bernardino

0.004%

0.0029061%
City
Loma Linda
San. Bernardino

0.009%

0.0071188%
City
Montclair
San Bernardino

0.039%

0.0322108%
City
Ontario
San. Bernardino

0.1.79%

0.1.472934%
City
Rancho Cucamonga
San Bernardino

0.084%

0.0689431%
City
Redlands
San. Bernardino

0.057%

0.0469150%
City
Rialto
San Bernardino

0.073%

0.0603206%
City
San Bernardino
San. Bernardino

0.178%

0.1.461.880%
City
Twentynine Palms
San Bernardino

0.002%

0.0012605%
City
Upland
San Bernardino

0.052%
0M424460%
City
Victorville
San Bernardino

0.033%

0.0269400%
City
Yucaipa
San Bernardino

0.016%

0.0128772%
10 of 15
Exhibit 11 473

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
Conn ty
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
Yucca Valley
San Bernardino

0.003%

0.0021228%
County
San Diego County
San Diego

5.706%

6.980%

5.9309748%
City
Carlsbad
San Diego

0.128%

0.1050485%
City
Chula Vista
San Diego

0.189%

0.231%

0.1.961456%
City
Coronado
San Diego

0.044%

0.0359095%
City
El. Ca'on
San Diego

0.113%

0.0933582%
City
Encinitas
San Diego

0.061%

0.074%

0.0630289%
City
Escondido
San Diego

0.1.45%

0.11.92204%
City
Imperial Beach
San Diego

0.014%

0.0118283%
City
La Mesa
San Diego

0.055%

0.068%

0.0575593%
City
Lemon Grove
San Diego

0.022%

0.0183911%
City
National City
San Diego

0.080%

0.0656808%
City
Oceanside
San Diego

0.213%

0.1753428%
City
Poway
San Diego

0.062%
0M511040%
City
San Diego
San Diego

1.975%

2.416%

2.0531169%
City
San Marcos
San Diego

0.089%

0.0733897%
City
Santee
San Diego

0.033%

0.0268401%
City
Solana Beach
San Diego

0.017%

0.0138564%
City
Vista
San Diego

0.052%

0.0425144%
Consolidated
San Francisco
San Francisco

3.026%

3.702%

3.1457169%
County
San Joaquin County
San Joacuin

1.680%

2.055%

1.7460399%
City
Lathro 1
San Joacuin

0.009%

0.0075394%
City
Lodi
San Joacuin

0.053%

0.0439484%
City
Manteca
San Joacuin

0.054%

0.0443454%
City
Rilon
San Joacuin

0.013%

0.0104219%
City
Stockton
San Joacuin

0.313%

0.383%

0.3256176%
City
Tracy
San Joacuin

0.084%

0.0692047%
County
San Luis Obispo County
San Luis Obispo

0.816%

0.999%

0.84841.26%
City
Arroyo Grande
San Luis Obis 30

0.024%

0.0199053%
City
Atascadero
San Luis Obispo

0.029%
0M240680%
11of15
Exhibit 11 474

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
Conn ty
Abatement
Percentage Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
E1 Paso de Robles (Paso Robles)
San Luis Obispo

0.043%

0.0353456%
City
Grover Beach
San Luis Obispo

0.017%
0M137881%
City
Morro Bay
San Luis Obispo

0.020%

0.0160922%
City
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo

0.077%
0M637841%
County
San Mateo County
San Mateo

1.074%

1.313%

1.1159599%
City
Belmont
San. Mateo

0.021%
0M169860%
City
Burlingame
San Mateo

0.019%

0.0152537%
City
Daly City
San. Mateo

0.044%

0.0363880%
City
East Palo Alto
San Mateo

0.013%

0.0103982%
City
Foster City
San. Mateo

0.020%

0.01.66101%
City
Half Moon Bay
San Mateo

0.004%

0.0031638%
City
Hillsborough
San. Mateo

0.013%
0M110029%
City
Menlo Park
San Mateo

0.015%

0.0126209%
City
Millbrae
San Mateo

0.013%

0.01.05836%
City
Pacifica
San Mateo

0.016%

0.0130625%
City
Redwood City
San Mateo

0.056%
0M463511%
City
San Bruno
San Mateo

0.021%

0.0172161%
City
San. Carlos
San Mateo

0.013%

0.0108885%
City
San Mateo
San Mateo

0.052%

0.0425841%
City
South San Francisco
San Mateo

0.043%

0.0353943%
County
Santa Barbara County
Santa Barbara

1.132%

1.385%

1.1768968%
City
Carpinteria
Santa Barbara

0.001%

0.0008938%
City
Goleta
Santa Barbara

0.004%

0.0028969%
City
Lom Doc
Santa Barbara

0.047%

0.0389379%
City
Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara

0.122%

0.1004559%
City
Santa Maria
Santa Barbara

0.058%

0.0479179%
County
Santa Clara County
Santa Clara

2.404%

2.941%

2.4987553%
City
Cam Dbell
Santa Clara

0.014%
0M112566%
City
Culertino
Santa Clara

0.008%

0.0066824%
City
Gilroy
Santa Clara

0.025%
0M202891%
12 of 15
Exhibit 11 475

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
Los Altos
Santa Clara

0.013%

0.0103338%
City
Los Gatos
Santa Clara

0.013%

0.0103220%
City
Milpitas
Santa Clara

0.036%

0.0298120%
City
Morgan Hill
Santa Clara

0.015%

0.0124619%
City
Mountain View
Santa Clara

0.041%

0.0334608%
City
Palo Alto
Santa Clara

0.039%

0.0323080%
City
San Jose
Santa Clara

0.294%

0.360%

0.3054960%
City
Santa Clara
Santa Clara

0.067%

0.0549723%
City
Saratoga
Santa Clara

0.004%

0.0034161%
City
Sunnyvale
Santa Clara

0.053%

0.0434069%
County
Santa Cruz County
Santa Cruz

0.783%

0.957%

0.8135396%
City
Capitola
Santa Cruz

0.020%

0.0168191%
City
Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz

0.143%

0.1180348%
City
Scotts Valley
Santa Cruz

0.015%

0.0126525%
City
Watsonville
Santa Cruz

0.063%

0.0520136%
County
Shasta County
Shasta

1.095%

1.339%

1.1380191%
City
Anderson
Shasta

0.024%

0.0198896%
City
Redding
Shasta

0.284%

0.2334841%
City
Shasta Lake
Shasta

0.004%

0.0031993%
County
Siskiyou County
Siskiyou

0.228%

0.279%

0.2373393%
County
Solano County
Solano

0.760%

0.6260795%
City
Benicia
Solano

0.031%

0.0253903%
City
Dixon
Solano

0.016%

0.0130849%
City
Fairfield
Solano

0.109%

0.0897317%
City
Suisun City
Solano

0.021%

0.0176183%
City
Vacaville
Solano

0.119%

0.0976497%
City
Valle.°
Solano

0.167%

0.1373644%
County
Sonoma County
Sonoma

1.218%

1.490%

1.2661290%
City
Healdsburg
Sonoma

0.032%

0.0266929%
City
Petaluma
Sonoma

0.081%

0.0667507%
13 of 15
Exhibit 11 476

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
County
Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
Rohnert Park
Sonoma

0.041%

0.0340759%
City
Santa Rosa
Sonoma

0.184%

0.1519070%
City
Sonoma
Sonoma

0.022%

0.0183438%
City
Windsor
Sonoma

0.016%

0.0129298%
County
Stanislaus County
Stanislaus

1.722%

1.4182273%
City
Ceres
Stanislaus

0.041%

0.0340260%
City
Modesto
Stanislaus

0.217%

0.1788759%
City
Newman
Stanislaus

0.006%

0.0046964%
City
Oakdale
Stanislaus

0.018%

0.0145531%
City
Patterson
Stanislaus

0.015%

0.0126590%
City
Riverbank
Stanislaus

0.010%

0.0085699%
City
Turlock
Stanislaus

0.065%

0.0531966%
County
Sutter County
Sutter

0.306%

0.374%

0.3179548%
City
Yuba City
Sutter

0.074%

0.0606242%
County
Tehama County
Tehama

0.213%

0.261%

0.2216654%
City
Red Bluff
Tehama

0.014%

0.0117771%
County
Trinity County
Trinity

0.082%

0.101%

0.0855476%
County
Tulare County
Tulare

0.809%

0.990%

0.8410949%
City
Dinuba
Tulare

0.014%

0.0116929%
City
Exeter
Tulare

0.004%

0.0032479%
City
Farmersville
Tulare

0.003%

0.0027879%
City
Lindsay
Tulare

0.007%

0.0057111%
City
Porterville
Tulare

0.021%

0.0171845%
City
Tulare
Tulare

0.037%

0.0302273%
City
Visalia
Tulare

0.066%

0.0545872%
County
Tuolumne County
Tuolumne

0.486%

0.594%

0.5047621 %
County
Ventura County
Ventura

2.192%

2.681%

2.2781201%
City
Camarillo
Ventura

0.002%

0.0012815%
City
Fillmore
Ventura

0.002%

0.0020294%
City
Moorpark
Ventura

0.008%

0.0067337%
14 of 15
Exhibit 11 477

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision
Conn ty
Abatement
Percentage Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Weighted
Al'cation
Percentage
City
Oxnard
Ventura

0.156%

0.190%

0.1617338%
City
Port Hueneme
Ventura

0.021%
0M174145%
City
San Buenaventura (Ventura)
Ventura

0.085%

0.0702181%
City
Santa Paula
Ventura

0.014%
0M119072%
City
Simi Valley
Ventura

0.065%

0.0533043%
City
Thousand Oaks
Ventura

0.022%

0.01.79902%
County
Yolo County
Yolo

0.357%

0.437%

0.3713319%
City
Davis
Yolo

0.055%

0.0451.747%
City
West Sacramento
Yolo

0.066%

0.0544321%
City
Woodland
Yolo

0.058%

0.0477904%
County
Yuba County
Yuba

0.214%

0.262%

0.2225679%
City
Marysville
Yuba

0.014%

0.01.1.2079%
15 of 15
Exhibit 11 478

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 2
Cost Reimbursement Procedure
. Additional defined terms:
a) Costs means the reasonable amounts paid for the attorney and other City Attorney and County Counsel staff time for individuals employed by a Plaintiff Subdivision at the contractual rate, inclusive of benefits and overhead, together with amounts paid for court reporters, experts, copying, electronic research, travel, vendors, and the like, which were not previously reimbursed and which were paid or incurred (i) prior to December 31, 2022 in litigation against any Opioid Defendant and/or (ii) in negotiating and drafting any CA Allocation Agreement(s) concerning a settlement with any Opioid Defendant(s).

Costs does not include attorneys' fees, costs, or expenses incurred by private contingency fee counsel. No part of the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be used to reimburse Costs.
b) First Claims Date means October 1, 2023 or when all applications for reimbursement of Costs, in whole or in part, from funds available under Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walmart Settlement Agreement, Section XIV and Exhibit R of the Teva Settlement Agreement, Section XIII and Exhibit R of the Allergan Settlement Agreement, Section X and Exhibit R of the Distributor Settlement Agreement, Section XI and Exhibit R of the Janssen Settlement Agreement, Section X and Exhibit R of the CVS Settlement Agreement, or Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, have been finally determined under the provisions of those agreements, whichever comes first. c) Special Master means a retired judicial officer or former public lawyer, not presently employed or retained by a Plaintiff Subdivision, who will aggregate, review, and determine the reasonable Costs to be awarded to each Plaintiff Subdivision that submits a claim for reimbursement of Costs. The Special Master will be selected by a majority vote of the votes cast by Plaintiff Subdivisions, with each such subdivision having one vote. d) Plaintiff Subdivision Committee means the committee of Plaintiff Subdivisions that will review and approve the invoices submitted by the Special Master reflecting his or her reasonable time and expenses.

2. Cost Reimbursement to Plaintiff Subdivision
a) Purpose. Substantial resources have been expended to hold Opioid Defendants accountable for creating and profiting from the opioid crisis, and this effort has been a significant catalyst in creating National Opioid Settlements with various manufacturers, distributors, and chain pharmacies.
b) Claims Procedure.
i. If a Plaintiff Subdivision is eligible to seek reimbursement of Costs, in whole or in 1 Exhibit 11 479

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO part, from funds available under Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walmart Settlement Agreement, Section XIV and Exhibit R of the Teva Settlement Agreement, Section XIII and Exhibit R of the Allergan Settlement Agreement, Section X and Exhibit R of the CVS Settlement Agreement, Section IX and Exhibit R of the Walgreens Settlement Agreement, Section X or Exhibit R of the Distributor Settlement Agreement, or Section XI or Exhibit R of the Janssen Settlement Agreement, it must first make a timely application for reimbursement from such funds. To allow sufficient time for deter urination of those applications, no claim for Costs to the CA Subdivision Fund under this Agreement may be made before the First Claims Date.
ii. A Plaintiff Subdivision that wishes to be reimbursed from the CA Subdivision Fund must submit a claim to the Special Master no later than forty-five (45) days after the First Claims Date. The Special Master will then compile and redistribute the aggregated claim totals for each Plaintiff Subdivision via email to representatives of all the Plaintiff Subdivisions. A claim for attorney and staff time must list, for each attorney or staff member included in the claim, the following information: name, title, total hours claimed, hourly rate (including, if sought, benefits and share of overhead), and narrative summarizing the general nature of the work performed by the attorney or staff member. For reimbursement of "hard" costs, the subdivision. may aggregate across a category (e.g., total for travel costs). It is the intention of the Plaintiff Subdivisions that submission of documents related to reimbursement of Costs does not waive any attorney -client privilege or exemptions to the California Public Records Act.
iii. The Special Master may request, at his or her sole option, additional documents or details to assist in the final award of Costs.
iv. The Special Master will review claims for reasonableness and will notify each Plaintiff Subdivision of the final detei urination of its claim, and will provide a list of all final awards to all Plaintiff Subdivisions by email or, upon request, via First Class U.S. Mail. Any Plaintiff Subdivision may ask the Special Master to reconsider any final award within twenty-one (21) days. The Special Master will make a final determination on any such reconsideration request within thirty (30) days of receipt.
v. Any decision of the Special Master is final and binding, and will be considered under the California Arbitration Act, Code of Civil Procedure section 1280 et seq. as a final arbitration award. Nothing in this agreement is intended to expand the scope of judicial review of the final award for errors of fact or law, and the Parties agree that they may only seek to vacate the award if clear and convincing evidence demonstrates one of the factors set forth in Code of Civil Procedure, section 1286.2, subdivision (a). Plaintiff Subdivisions will have fourteen (14) days after all final awards are made, together with any final determination of a request for Exhibit 11 480

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO reconsideration, to seek review in the Superior Court of California, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 1285, where the State has filed its Consent Judgment. vi. The Special Master will prepare a report of Costs that includes his or her fees and expenses at least ninety (90) days before the Payment Date for each Annual Payment. The Special Master's preparation of a report of Costs does not discharge a Plaintiff Subdivision's reporting requirement under Section V(B)(2) of the Walmart Settlement Agreement.
vii. A member of the Plaintiff Subdivision Committee, which is a CA Participating Subdivision, will submit to the Settlement Fund Administrator and Walmart a report of the fees and expenses incurred by the Special Master pursuant to Section V(B)(2) of the Walmart Settlement Agreement.
c) Claims Priority and Limitation.

The Special Master will submit invoices for compensation of reasonable fees and expenses to the Plaintiff Subdivision Committee no later than ninety (90) days prior to the Payment Date for each Annual Payment. The Plaintiff Subdivision Committee will promptly review and, if reasonable, approve the Special Master's invoice for compensation. The Plaintiff Subdivision. Committee will submit approved invoices to the Settlement Fund Administrator for payment. The Special Master's approved invoices have priority and will be paid first from the CA Subdivision Fund before any award of Costs, subject to the limitation in Section

2.c.v below.
ii. Final Awards of Costs that do not exceed seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000.00) will be paid next in priority after the Special Master's approved invoices.
iii. Final Awards of Costs in excess of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000.00) will be paid proportionally from the funds remaining in that year's Annual Payment. iv. Any claim for Costs that is not paid in full will be allocated against the next year's distribution from the CA Subdivision Fund, until all approved claims for Costs are paid in full.
v. In no event will more than 50% of the total CA Subdivision Fund received in any year be used to pay Costs or the Special Master's approved invoices. vi. In no event shall more than $28 million of the total CA Subdivision Funds paid pursuant to the Walmart Settlement Agreement, Teva Settlement Agreement, Allergan Settlement Agreement, Distributor Settlement Agreement, CVS Settlement Agreement, Janssen Settlement Agreement, and the Walgreens Settlement Agreement be used to pay Costs.

Exhibit 11 481

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO d) Collateral Source Payments and Third -Party Settlement.

In the event a Plaintiff Subdivision is awarded compensation, in whole or in part, by any source of funds created as a result of litigation against an Opioid Defendant for its reasonable Costs, it will reduce its claim for Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund by that amount. If a Plaintiff Subdivision has already received a final award of Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund, it will repay the fund up to the prior award of Costs via a payment to the Settlement Fund Administrator or notify the Settlement Fund Administrator that its allocation from the next and subsequent Annual Payments should be reduced accordingly. If the Plaintiff Subdivision is repaying any prior award of Costs, that repayment will occur as soon as is feasible after the Plaintiff Subdivision's receipt of Cost funds from the collateral source, but no more than 90 days after its receipt from the collateral source. The Settlement Fund Administrator will add any repaid Costs to the CA Subdivision Fund. Any Plaintiff Subdivision that has submitted for reimbursement to any national fund and has not received a final determination by the First Claims Date may request that the settlement administrator withhold some or all of its payment from the CA Subdivision Fund in order to avoid repayment.
ii. In the event a Plaintiff Subdivision reaches a monetary settlement or compromise against any Opioid Defendant outside of the National Opioid Settlement, the monetary portion of such settlement, net of fees paid to outside contingency fee counsel and of funds earmarked strictly for abatement, will be credited against its Costs and the subdivision will be ineligible to recover those credited Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund. Plaintiff Subdivisions negotiating monetary settlements or compromises against any Opioid Defendant outside of the National Opioid Settlement will negotiate for funds to repay any Costs it previously received from the CA Subdivision Fund or for Costs it otherwise might be eligible to claim from the CA Subdivision Fund. If such a settlement is paid after all final approved claims for Costs by all Plaintiff Subdivisions are satisfied in full, the settling subdivision will reimburse the CA Subdivision Fund in that amount by making payment to the Settlement Fund Administrator to add to the CA Subdivision Fund in a manner consistent with the repayments described in section 2.d.i above.

Exhibit 11 482

DocuSign Envelope ID: 795FC822-655C-4BAB-8EC7-CO6F26F85FDO APPENDIX 3

CALIFORNIA -SUBDIVISION BACKSTOP AGREEMENT
On August 6, 2021, Judge Polster of the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio issued an Order (the Order), docket number 3814, in In Re National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL 2804, addressing contingent attorney fee contracts between political. subdivisions eligible to participate in the Walmart Settlement and their counsel.

In light of the Order, and at the request of [SUBDIVISION], the [SUBDIVISION], its counsel [COUNSEL], and the California Attorney General, on behalf of the State of California, are entering into this California -Subdivision Backstop Agreement (Backstop Agreement). [SUBDIVISION] and [COUNSEL] intend this Backstop Agreement to constitute a State Back - Stop Agreement as that tern' is used in the Order and in Exhibit R (Agreement on Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Expenses) of the Walmart Settlement Agreement.

Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, [SUBDIVISION] may, subject to the limitations of the Walmart Settlement Agreement and CA Walmart Allocation Agreement, as well as any other limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the Walmart Settlement CA Subdivision Fund to pay a contingent fee to [COUNSEL]. Any such payment from [SUBDIVISION] to [COUNSEL], together with any contingency fees that [COUNSEL] may receive from the national Attorney Fee Fund, will not exceed a total contingency fee of [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED 15%] of the total gross recovery of [SUBDIVISION] from the Walmart Settlement.
[COUNSEL] certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund created under the Walmart Settlement Agreement before seeking or accepting payment under this backstop agreement. [COUNSEL] further certify that they are not seeking and will not accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of "State Back - Stop Agreement" in Exhibit R of the Walmart Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to be between "a Settling State" and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does not require the payment of any state funds to [SUBDIVISION], [COUNSEL], or any other party.
[DATE]
[DATE]
[DATE]
[SUBDIVISION SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[COUNSEL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
Exhibit 11 483

CITY OF BELL GARDENS

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER

AGENDA REPORT
Item 17.

TO:

FROM:

BY:

SUBJECT:

DATE:

Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Michael B. O'Kelly, City Manager
Veronica Sanchez, Management Analyst

UPDATE ON FORD PARK INFILTRATION CISTERN PROJECT
April 10, 2023
RECOMMENDATION:

It is staff's recommendation that the City Council by motion receive and file the John Anson Ford Park Infiltration Cistern Project Status Update.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

The purpose of the project is to comply with stormwater regulations set forth by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB) under the Municipal Separate Stormwater Sewer System, the MS4 Permit. The project will capture trash, nutrients, heavy metals, bacteria, and reduce toxicity in the urban runoff from the watershed by installing stormwater and dry weather flow diversion pre-treatment, retention, and infiltration facilities that will capture and infiltrate the stormwater runoff prior to it reaching the Rio Hondo. In addition to reducing the amount of pollutants entering the Rio Hondo Channel, capturing the runoff will help augment the regional water supply in the Central Basin. The Project is a regional stormwater quality improvement project that is being constructed to meet the requirements of the LARWQCB MS4 Permit by capturing and treating runoff from a 2,295 -acre watershed within the Lower Los Angeles River Upper Reach 2 Watershed Management Area which consists of the cities of Bell, Bell Gardens, Commerce, Cudahy, Huntington Park, Maywood and Vernon.

The John Anson Ford Park Project funding is $21,505,380.00 provided through a combination of contributions by the Cities of Bell Gardens, Bell, Commerce, Cudahy, Huntington Park, Maywood, and Vernon; grant funding from the State of California Prop 1 Stormwater Program; Los Angeles County's Safe Clean Water Program; and the Metropolitan Water District's Stormwater Recharge Program. The funding is as follows:
• The initial funding was through the Cities' contribution of $1,100,538. • Funding from the State's Prop 1 Stormwater Program of $9,904,842. • Funding in the amount of $10M to expand the project through LA County's Safe Clean Water Program Measure W. The Measure W funding was received in two tranches, $8M in 2021 and $2M in 2022. • MWD has provided funding for monitoring the amount of water captured and recharged to the Central Basin aquifer over a three-year period. Funds will be reimbursed as data on the amount of water captured is reported.

The project is behind schedule and will be completed later summer or fall of 2023. The delays are due to a combination of Contractor performance and weather. A major delay was the deficiencies in the precast concrete installation for the first portion of the 13.5 AF extension. The other reasons for the delays relate to the Contractor's staffing and ability to prosecute the work in a timely manner and weather. The past three months have been quite wet with a series of storm events during which the Contractor did not work. A summary of the major dates from the start of the project to the estimated completion of the project is presented in the Table below:
484

JAF Park Infiltration Cistern Project
Schedule Summary
Notice to Proceed
January 13, 2020
Original Project Completion Date
April 29, 2021
Authorized Project Expansion
November 10, 2020
Revised Contract Completion Date
November 27, 2021
Current Contract Completion Date
February 2, 2022
Contractor's 3/8/2023 Completion Date
July 27, 2023
Estimated Completion Date
September 29, 2023
Estimated Project Close-out
December 2023
CONCLUSION:

Once completed the project will have a huge environmental benefit. The City will not only have made significant strides to meet regional water quality objectives but also see improvements to portions of John Anson Ford Park that include: new irrigation systems, trees, pavement (new parking lot), sidewalks, exterior lighting, conduit/wiring (electrical), landscaping, and park monument signs and fencing.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The project is estimated at $21,505,380 by grant funding from the State of California Prop 1 Stormwater Program, Los Angeles County's Safe Clean Water Program, the Metropolitan Water District's Stormwater Recharge Program and the initial funding through the Cities' contribution.

ATTACHMENTS:

Exhibit 1 - Presentation
APPROVED ELECTRONICALLY BY:

Michael B. O'Kelly, City Manager
Stephanie Vasquez, City Attorney and/or Susie Altamirano, Assistant Attorney Manuel Carrillo, Director of Finance and Administrative Services 485

Los Angeles River Upper Reach 2 Watershed Management Area Exhibit 1

Agenda

1. Background

2. Project Overview

3. Status
Exhibit 1
487

Los Angeles River Upper Reach 2
Watershed Management Area (LAR
UR2 WMA)
Watershed Management Program (WMP) Plan
Submittal Date: June 26, 2014
Revision Submittal Date: January 27, 2015
Conditional Approval Date: April 28, 2015
Revision Submittal Date: June 12, 2015
Final Approval Date: August 13, 2015
Background
LA Regional Water Quality Control Board
MS4 Permit
John Anson Ford (JAF) Park Infiltration Cistern Project is a regional stormwater improvement project
The project captures and treats runoff for a 2,295 acre watershed within the Lower Los Angeles River Upper Reach 2 Watershed Management Area
tLA River Upper Reac 2
Watershed Managi itArea

Background
JAF Park Infiltration Cistern Project Funding
Source
Amount
City funds contributed by BeII, BeII Gardens, Commerce, $1,100,538.00
Cudahy, Huntington Park, Maywood, Vernon
CA Proposition 1 Stormwater Grant
Initial Project — 8 AF Infiltration Cistern
$9,904,842.00
LA County Safe Clean Water Measure W Program
FY 2020-2021 Funding
$8,000,000.00
FY 2021-2022 Funding
$2,000,000.00
Metropolitan Water District Stormwater Recharge Pilot
$500,000.00
Program (future reimbursement)
TOTAL
$21,505,380.00

Project Overview
JAF Park Project Objectives
• Divert runoff water from the storm drain
system for pretreatment and groundwater
replenishment
• Improve water quality, increase water
supply, and achieve Water Quality
Objectives for the Rio Hondo watershed
portion of the Los Angeles River Upper
Reach 2 Watershed Management Area
Central Subbasin of the Coastal Plain of Los Angeles Central Groundwater Basin Exhibit 1
490

Project Overview
Park Lane P:krkln p Lv3i.

Ini€i ,l Precast Ed
DNE:17,4Dr irks
MM Mm Om mom mirimmromm MM mM"'mom matmM mm mm mm Wm
F remsst Cistern
x,err=i 13.t -
Major Construction
Items

1. Diversion Works

2. Precast Cistern
Installation
S. New Electrical
Service

4. Instrumentation &
Controls

5. Restoration

Infiltration Cistern

Status - Schedule

1. Notice to Proceed

2. Original Project Completion Date

3. Authorized Project Expansion

4. Revised Contract Completion Date

5. Current Contract Completion Date

6. Contractor's 3/8/2023 Completion Date

7. Estimated Completion Date

8. Estimated Project Close-out
January 13, 2020
April 29, 2021
November 10, 2020
November 27, 2021
February 2, 2022
July 27, 2023
September 29, 2023
December 2023

Park Lane Parking Lot

Park Lane Parkway

Cistern Construction
�,4

Cistern Construction
spa
t �,

Exhibit 1 498

CITY OF BELL GARDENS

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER

AGENDA REPORT
Item 18.

TO:

FROM:

BY:

SUBJECT:

DATE:

Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Michael B. O'Kelly, City Manager
Elizabeth Nava, Director of Recreation and Community Services

SPORTS CENTER FIELD USAGE
April 10, 2023
RECOMMENDATION:

It is staff's recommendation that the City Council receive and file this report.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

Bell Gardens Sports Center
The Bell Gardens Sports Center is home to 3 state of the art synthetic turf soccer fields, 2 natural turf (grass) soccer fields, 2 baseball fields, and a concession stand. These facilities are used for City youth and adult sports programming and are made available on a first come first served basis to members of the public who wish to rent out the fields. The synthetic fields are open to the public for "walk up" use whenever the fields are not permitted for use to an organization or user group.

Application process and recuirements
For members of the public and organizations looking to rent field space there is an application process as well as a fee schedule and insurance requirement that must be completed prior to a field permit being granted. If an organization wants to host a tournament and include projected sound/music, food vendors and other event aspects, an additional Special Event Permit issued through the City's Community Development Department would be required in addition to the RCS Application requirements.

Application
Applications are available at the Recreation and Community Services Administrative office and the Sports Office located at Ford Park. The rules and regulations as well as the fees associated with renting one of the fields/facilities are given when the application is submitted.

Insurance Requirements
The City requires each entity renting the field to provide evidence of insurance coverage naming the City as additionally insured. Minimum coverage in the amount of $1 million dollars for comprehensive general liability coverage for up to 1,000 participants, and $2 million for over 1,000 participants.

Fees
In December 2021, a new Master Fee Schedule for Recreation and Community Services Fees was approved by the City Council. These fees include rental of the Sports Center fields and facilities and are what the staff uses when charging various user groups. Discounts are offered to organizations with the majority of their participants being Bell Gardens residents as well as for non-profit organizations within the community. 499

Fees are determined based off the user group status, type of use and needs of the user group. Some of the fees include but are not limited to, refundable deposits, cancellation fees, field prep, field usage, staff time, security personnel, portable restrooms, field light usage, first aid fees and special venue fees. The City offers hourly rates depending upon the need of the user group.

Field usage
The Turf fields at the Bell Gardens Sports Complex are the most frequently rented and used, more so than the grass field. In order to maintain the grass field and keep them in optimal condition, those fields are less frequently rented out to various user groups. Currently, during peak field usage hours, we are fully booked for our synthetic turf fields, as they are the most popular for rentals.

Peak Field Usage
The fields are used most heavily in the evening hours during the week and all day into the evenings on the weekends.

These weekend and weeknight user groups have fulfilled the application requirements and have received permits for exclusive use of the fields. In the morning, Monday through Friday, the synthetic fields are primarily used by "walk- ons" or individuals who do not require a permit and are taking advantage of the open fields.

Recreation and Community Services Department Usage
The Recreation and Community Services Department hosts a variety of programs at the Sports Center including Small Fry Soccer and Senior Soccer. There is currently a cistern project where the baseball fields are, but when the project is complete, the RCS Department will have the opportunity to expand current baseball and softball programs by once again hosting youth baseball and softball, as well as adult softball and baseball leagues at the Sports Center.

Local School Districts and Private Schools
The schools and districts that utilize the soccer fields typically use them in off-peak hours.

Districts: Montebello Unified School District
Bell Gardens High School
Private School: St. Gertrude
Charter Schools: Oscar De La Hoya Animo Charter School
Stern Math & Science School
California Charter School J PA -Rise Kohyang
University Prep Value High School
External Leagues: United Premier Soccer League UPSL
(This league has two separate teams that use fields)
Club Athletics
AS Los Angeles
On Going Leagues
& participation years: RCS Small Fry Soccer
Halcones FC (5+ years)
LA Breakers FC (New)
Club Athletic LA (5+ years)
LAUFA (1+ year)
Cal Soccer League (1+year)
RCS Adult Sports
AS LA (New)
Elite SC (5+ years)
CS Scorpions (1+ year)
FC Golden State (2+ years)
Venegas Foundation (1+ year)
500

So. Cal. Elite (1+ year) KSA Soccer (New)
Peak Hour Field Schedule -On Going User Groups During Peak Hours 6-9
-9
5 7-9
6- 6-1Op
7- :3ta- 5 9p 6- 5-9p 6-p
° :30-5:30p 6- 6-9p
5 6: 0a -4:30p 6-9 6-p
5:3-7p
*S= Synthetic Turf *G= Grass Turf
6-p
6-9p
5:30-7p
0: 0 r
5w:30p
9:30a -6p
7a-7
a -7p
9:30a -p
Annual Revenue
The Bell Gardens Sports Center is the highest source of revenue for the Recreation and Community Services Department. In December 2021, the City implemented a new fee schedule as well as opened up access to field rentals to more user groups. On average, the Sports Center brings in approximately $200,000 in revenue each year.

Below is a list of revenue generated from the past 5 fiscal years and the revenue brought in thus far from the current FY 22-23 (there is still 3 months of programming left in this fiscal year). Please note that FY19-20, 20-21 and 21-22 were impacted by the closure of the Sports Center due to the COVI D-19 Pandemic.

FY17-18 $240,939
FY18-19 $204,497
FY19-20 $135,577 (pandemic closed Sports Center for 4 months) FY20-21 $0 (Sports Center closed all year due to the pandemic) FY21-22 $49,085 (field rentals slowly resumed at the latter portion of the fiscal year) FY22-23 $173,876 (still 3 months left in the fiscal year, we are projected to exceed $200,000) CONCLUSION:

The BeII Gardens Sports Center at Ford Park continues to draw organizations and user groups looking for high quality sports fields. The fields are currently rented out at maximum capacity during peak usage hours, but there is availability during the week in the morning and early afternoon. The RCS Department will continue to expand programming as construction projects are completed, and fields and parking become available.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No fiscal impact.

APPROVED ELECTRONICALLY BY:

Michael B. O'Kelly, City Manager
Stephanie Vasquez, City Attorney and/or Susie Altamirano, Assistant Attorney Manuel Carrillo, Director of Finance and Administrative Services 501

Los Angeles River Upper Reach 2 Watershed Management Area

Agenda

1. Background

2. Project Overview

3. Status

Background
LA Regional Water Quality Control Board
MS4 Permit
John Anson Ford (JAF) Park Infiltration Cistern Project is a regional stormwater improvement project
The project captures and treats runoff for a 2,295 acre watershed within the Lower Los Angeles River Upper Reach 2 Watershed Management Area
Recenimq Water
LA HA
CouPt, of Los Ano,es
ew_
River Upper Reaca 2
Watershed Manag-" t Area
Los Angeles River Upper Reach 2
Watershed Management Area (LAR
UR2 WMA)
Watershed Management Program (WMP) Plan
Submittal Date: June 26, 2014
Revision Submittal Date: January 27, 2015
Conditional Approval Date: April 28, 2015
Revision Submittal Date: June 12, 2015
► Final Approval Date: August 13, 2015

Background
JAF Park Infiltration Cistern Project Funding
Source
Amount
City funds contributed by BeII, BeII Gardens, Commerce, $1,100,538.00
Cudahy, Huntington Park, Maywood, Vernon
CA Proposition 1 Stormwater Grant
Initial Project -- 8 AF Infiltration Cistern
$9,904,842.00
LA County Safe Clean Water Measure W Program
FY 2020-2021 Funding
$8,000,000.00
FY 2021-2022 Funding
$2,000,000.00
Metropolitan Water District Stormwater Recharge Pilot
$500,000.00
Program (future reimbursement)
TOTAL
$21,505,380.00

Project Overview
JAF Park Project Objectives
• Divert runoff water from the storm drain
system for pretreatment and groundwater
replenishment
• Improve water quality, increase water
supply, and achieve Water Quality
Objectives for the Rio Hondo watershed
portion of the Los Angeles River Upper
Reach 2 Watershed Management Area
Central Subbasin of the Coastal Plain of Los Angeles Central Groundwater Basin

Project Overview
Major Construction
Items
i. Diversion Works

2. Precast Cistern
Installation

3. New Electrical
Service

4. Instrumentation &
Controls

5. Restoration

Infiltration Cistern

Status - Schedule
i. Notice to Proceed

2. Original Project Completion Date

3. Authorized Project Expansion

4. Revised Contract Completion Date

5. Current Contract Completion Date

6. Contractor's 3/8/2023 Completion Date

7. Estimated Completion Date

8. Estimated Project Close-out
January 13, 2020
April 29, 2021
November 10, 2020
November 27, 2021
February 2, 2022
July 27, 2023
September 29, 2023
December 2023

Park Lane Parking Lot

Park Lane Parkway

Cistern Construction

Cistern Construction

Los Angeles
River Ranger Pilot Program
WATER BOND 2014
Watershed
Conservation
Authority

RIVERS AND

MOUNTAINS

CONSERVANCY

Program Overview

LOS ANGELES RIVER

RANGER PROGRAM

ESTABLISHMENT PLAN
➢ The Los Angeles River Ranger
Program Establishment Plan was
developed in response to AB 1558
(C. Garcia)
➢ Plan was completed in May 2019 by
RMC, SMMC, WCA and MRCA, since
then have been working to
implement a pilot program

Program Overview
GOALS
Foster
connections
between
communities
Promote safe,
equitable usage
and stewardship
Activate it as a
connected
greenway

LOS ANGELES
Stakeholder Cities Along the LA River & its Tributaries

HUNTINGTON PARK
I „1--CUt
t l r SON GATE

LONG BEACH
Los Angeles County
U 1.75 3.5
Miles
7 3

Services Provided
Public Safety
(River Ambassadors)
Maintenance
(River Ambassadors)
Outreach
(River Ambassadors)
Interpretive and
Educational
Programs
Administrative Coordination
(Advisory Committee)

Program Overview
>REACH Zone @ LA
and Rio Hondo
Confluence
>Approximately
5 miles
>Cities of South
Gate, Downey,
and Bell Gardens
LA River Ranger
Pilot Program
REACH Zone at the Lower LA River
and Rio Hondo Confluence
hn Anson Ford park,'
Beli,Garde�s
5 Advisory Committee Members
County:

SD 4
Public Works
Parks and Recreation — Trails Division
City:

Downey staff and Downey PD
South Gate PD
Bell Gardens PD
Homeless Services:

LAHSA
Education and Workforce Development:

Rio Hondo College
CBOs:

Sacred Places Institute
Pro'ect Team:

Watershed Conservation Authority
Conservation Corps of Long Beach
River in Action
Nature for All
Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority
6 River Ambassadors
• Enhance and support ecological, social and recreation opportunities through public safety, maintenance/ stewardship, and education • Safety presence, unarmed
• Workforce development for green jobs, progressive specializations • Multi -jurisdictional communications and with safety departments and homeless services
Safety
Education
Stewardship

Recreation and Interpretive/
Educational Programming
NATURE

FOR ALL
PROTECT • CREATE • CONNECT

Recreation and Interpretive/
Educational Programming

Thank You
Questions:

WCA Project Manager:

Natalia Doshi, [email protected]
WATER BOND 2014
Watershed
Conservation
Authority

RAVERS A O

MOUNTAINS

CONSERVANCY
NATURE

FOR ALL
PROTECT • CREATE • CONNECT

Fiscal Year 2022-2023

State of the Art Sports Center
3 Synthetic Turf Fields
2 Natural Turf (Grass) Fields
2 Baseball Fields (Currently
under construction)
Concession building

Background and
Discussion
�► Fields are used for:
�► City programming
Youth and Adult Sports
► Sports Leagues and Teams
ID' Application and fees
�► Open/Walk up play on synthetic fields
► Available on a first come first served
basis
t. Only when fields are not permitted.
use to an organization

Applications are required
Available at Ford Park Admin
Office
Insurance Requirements
Comprehensive General
Liability
Amount of coverage depends
on number of participants.

CITY OF REEL GARDENS

RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Oita, NIS L.nn ti:u Coed:a. CA ar 2l • ad t;o2i ant.,50 • Fax t;vli 37.1 t'V SPORTS CENT ER RENTAI. APPLICATION (Auplientiun"1
Please rend the F INTO I SE FOLIC) AND ISF:R Rt I.F.S .1\D HEW IA f1ONS FOR RESERVING SPQR t INC: FIELDS A t ME REIT GARDENS SPOR Ps t E\ I ER nhith is hereby incorporated into and made a part of this Application. Ike, 'loon...n anti of w1pp.narny dtamancntano;, emus he .,ehmitted to Site Rccrc.xiaie and Comment. hlr.rl perri danm;:c, ss hrch L m:ry im<ur or eau, :a ihud party to nom a,.i ie.utt of Ins use^ of Sports Center t'aeiiily(ie,) reload try the .Application. INO1 it1:

I agree m hold l arrntrss. mdcmalte. and defend the City. Its . flSams. amnions onto. agents. employee,. Soiuotetn and other per,mi, acting on its behalf, t'rom and against any and all claims. luebilily', los:, and expense, including attorney tee, and court costs, for all damage related to Injury. death or other harmer change two an} per,onts) Sac property that may ',twat from any alleged intentional. reakles, negligent. or other, rse wrongful act, error or °unyokes by any parry relating to my and n orga,Il ;ttlat , use nil tart) Sport. Center Facility or FacditY equipment. or the conhnon of such hacdnv or g. but not limited to wait. ha part eSpan.. spectator,. and other attendees. Such duty does not include e from rite active negligence. sole negligence is sole a tint amai :duet of the FIG. nz criticized qualified representative of the Applicant Organization. on behalf of sett members of the ,tppticant Organization, I accept this Save Hartnkws Agreement as ssorded above. I agree to pros ids a ups or 61,c Sports Center Participant Hold Harmless Indemnification Agreement cox mad by Gob Parvcip:ent to the Re.rmed..n thuss.. pare to the es cot I understand I :nn tit ,ncr,dty re,p0asthle tic oil ehrnmnc to Gocilifi,% or cympm.:nt related to the:

AppIwaru (hc,anvanon's ra my use of the Fl atly, and Mc Fee and Deposit indicated halos.. INS rt)LS.

FEE:

Applicant Signature: Date:

Recreation Director Signature: Date:
1t l+ri. 1O01,O,1 . .r N..,:msa
Paid On: DEPOSIT: Paid On:

II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIhIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I IhIIIIIII10N°11U°°moon u r n ...
"'re5'"II' o .: �'.....

Baseball fields are temporarily unavailable during
construction
Soccer fields are most heavily used weekday evenings (after 5pm) and weekends
• The Soccer fields are currently fully booked during peak hours Weekday mornings synthetic turf fields are occupied by
"walk-ons" (not for organized groups)
Natural turf (grass) fields are rented and used more sparingly In order to maintain the integrity of the fields and keep them in optimal condition

The Bell Gardens Sports Center is the
RCS Department's greatest revenue
generator.

On Average the Sports Center Brings in
approximately $200,000
The Cistern project and the pandemic
have impacted revenues
This fiscal year we project to bring in
over $200,000 from Soccer field
rentals alone.

Revenue Overview
Pied
Year
17-18
$240,939
n ua1 Rev 1
Generate
18-19 $204,497
19-20 $135,577
(Closed in March 2020)
20-21 $0
(Sports Center Closed)
21-22 $49,085
(Re -opened in 2022)
22-23 $173,876
(3 months left in FY)

It is staff's recommendation that the City Council
receive and file this report.

Questions?

From: Jhanelly Alcaraz
To: PublicComments
Subject: Good afternoon
Date: Monday, April 10, 2023 2:55:54 PM
I'm a resident at bell gardens my landlord just increase my rent $85 in currently paying $1,650 so he wants $1,735 by May 1 is this legal for him to do this he just gave it to me on April 1 and it will take effect May 1 can you please help out and if it's ok for him to do this rent increase or not I will really appreciate it
Thank you
Sent from my iPhone

From: Maria Marquez
To: PublicComments
Subject: Mi nombre es maria Marquez y me estan subiendo la renta 400 dolares tengo 5 anos viviendo ai y ahora como el dueno se enfermo los hijos me estan subiendo 400 dolares con 2 meses de anticipacion y en 5 afios no habian tenido ningun arreglo ala propiedad
Date: Monday, April 10, 2023 4:09:03 PM
Enviado desde mi iPhone

From: sandra gonzalez
To: PublicComments
Subject: Rent Control
Date: Monday, April 10, 2023 2:36:56 PM
Hello,
I know the rent control in Bell Gardens is 4%, but my landlord thinks he can do 10% and increase from $1500 to $1600. Can he do that? What can I do? Thanks for your time and help in advance.

Sincerely
Sandra Gonzalez
[email protected]
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

← All documents from this meeting