Bell Gardens City Council
April 8, 2024

Exhibit 2 169

DEFINITIONS, TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Definitions: In order to simplify and clarify the language throughout this Request for Proposals, the following definitions shall apply:

CITY: The City of Bell Gardens, CA.

CITY COUNCIL: The elected officials of the City of Bell Gardens, who have been given the authority to exercise such powers and jurisdiction on all City business as conferred by the State Constitution and Laws.

CONTRACT: An agreement between the City and the selected firm to furnish supplies and/or services over a designated period during which repeated purchases are made of the commodity and/or service specified.

RFP: Request for Proposal.

FIRM/CONSULTANT: Organization offering a proposal in response to this RFP.

Proposal Terms and Conditions:

Electronic Documents
Consultants may be supplied with the original RFP documents in electronic form to aid in the preparation of proposal(s). By accepting these electronic documents, each Consultant agrees not to edit or change the language or format of these documents. Submission of a proposal by consultants signifies full agreement with this requirement.

Receipt of Proposals
Submitted proposal(s) must be properly addressed and received by the City prior to the date and time specified. The mere fact that the proposal was dispatched will not be considered; the Consultant must ensure that the proposal is delivered.

Proposals received after the date and time specified shall be returned and will be considered void and unacceptable. The City is not responsible for the lateness of the mail carrier, etc.; and the time/date stamp of receipt by the City Clerk's Office shall be the official time of receipt.

Alterations
Proposals documents cannot be physically altered or amended after the closing date.

Alterations made before closing must be initialed by the Consultant to guarantee authenticity.

Proposals may not be withdrawn after the proposal closing date and each Consultant agrees to this stipulation upon submittal of its proposal. However, all proposals are subject to negotiation before a contract is awarded as further described below.

Questions and Inquiries
To ensure a fair and objective RFP process and evaluation, all questions and inquiries related to this RFP shall be addressed in writing to Steven Jones, City Planner. The deadline for written questions and inquiries is Thursday, August 11, 2022. City Hall is open Monday through Thursday from 7.30 AM to 6.00 PM.

Communication

Exhibit 2 170

The City shall not be responsible for any verbal communication between any employee of the City and any proposing firm. Only written requirements and qualifications will be considered.

No oral statement of any person shall modify or otherwise change, or affect the terms, conditions, or specifications stated in the resulting contract. All change orders to the contract will be made in writing by the City Manager.

Reservations
The City reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals received because of this request, to negotiate with all qualified sources, or to cancel, in part or in its entirety, this Request for Proposal if found in the best interest of the City.

Reimbursements
All costs incurred in the preparation of a proposal, the submission of additional information, and/or any other aspect of preparing a proposal will be borne by the Consultant.

Certification
Any proposal which does not contain all the information requested in this RFP will be considered incomplete and may be rejected by the City.

Funding
The City operates and is funded on a fiscal year basis. Accordingly, the City reserves the right to terminate, without any liability, any contract for which funding is not available.

Negotiations
Negotiations may be conducted with responsible firms who submit proposals that are reasonably susceptible of being selected. All firm(s) reasonably susceptible of being selected based on criteria set forth in this RFP may be given an opportunity to make a presentation and/or interview. Although this process will ultimately result in the award of a single contract, the City reserves the right to negotiate a contract with more than one firm.

Additional Information
During the proposal evaluation process, the City reserves the right, where it may serve the City's best interest, to request additional information or clarifications from proposers. The City also reserves the right to investigate the qualifications of the firm(s) as it deems appropriate.

RFP
Proposers should be aware that the RFP and the contents of the successful proposal will become a part of any subsequent contractual documents that may arise from this RFP. In the case of a discrepancy between the RFP and the firm's proposal, the contract will supersede.

All data, documents and other products used during the life of the project shall remain in the public domain upon the project's completion. Similarly, all responses to this RFP shall become the property of the City and will be retained or disposed of in the City's discretion.

Award of the Contract
Award of the contract will be by the City Council at a public meeting.

Exhibit 2 171

BACKGROUND
The City of Bell Gardens is located within Los Angeles County and is a General Law City governed by an elected five-member City Council that appoints the City Manager.

The subject site ("Site") is located at 5614, 5622, and 5636 Shull Street, contains the following seven parcels:
1) APN 6227-034-900
2) APN 6227-034-901
3) APN 6227-034-902
4) APN 6227-034-903
5) APN 6227-034-904
6) APN 6227-034-905
7) APN 6227-034-906
The City is seeking the services of an experienced professional consulting firm to provide remediation services within ECRG program implementation. The assistance to be provided by the consultant is necessary to ensure the City's proper and timely expenditure of program funds and compliance with other regulatory program requirements.

Department of Toxic Substances Control ("DTSC") / ECRG monies will be utilized to fund the services of the selected firm and the expenditure of such funds shall adhere to all applicable Federal, State, County/CDA, and local regulations.

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Based on a previous consultant's Revised Supplemental Site Assessment and Human Health Risk Assessment Report (SSA Report)dated July 13, 2022, and other information provided to the City in support of the ECRG application, the contracted individual or firm shall provide staffing and other resources as required to assist the City with the remediation of the Site for purposes of residential development, including-

1. Identify and discuss data gaps in site investigation work completed to date and develop a preliminary scope of work and budget to address each date gap identified.

2. Participate in a site visit with DTSC and RWQCB representatives to understand site access constraints and limitations.

3. Prepare a Remedial Action Plan (RAP) to describe the proposed remedial actions and any proposed additional characterization work needed to address data gaps and allow refinement, planning, and design of the remedial actions.

4. Assist with public outreach (and possible California Environmental Quality Act [CEQA] requirements).

5. Prepare design documents and plans and procure subcontractors.

Exhibit 2 172

6. Obtain permits and approvals.

7. Prepare final report.

Factors for consideration:

1. Site remediation activities are subject to California prevailing wage determination.

2. DTCS indicated payment term to the City are 90 days.

3. Proposed respondent subcontractors will be selected based on competitive bids and qualifications.

PROPOSAL FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS
Requirements
The following instructions describe the form in which proposals must be submitted.

Responses to the following items will be used for proposal evaluation. Proposals which do not contain responses to each of the requirement items will be considered incomplete and may be rejected.

Proposal documents should provide a straightforward, concise description of the firm's capabilities to satisfy the requirements of this RFP. Emphasis should be on completeness, clarity of content, and conveyance of the information requested by the City. The requirements stated do not preclude a firm from furnishing additional reports, functions, and costs as deemed appropriate.

Four copies of your response, two (2) bound, one (1) unbound and (1) electronic version (emailed to citVclerkdesk(a)bellgardens.org and siones(a1bel4gardens.org), must be submitted no later than 5.00 p.m. on Monday, August 15, 2022 to the City Clerk's Office. The electronic version of the proposal must be an exact duplicate of the hard copies. If the proposal includes any comments over and above the specific information requested in this RFP, such information should be included as a separate appendix and placed at the end of the proposal.

The proposal must contain the following five (5) elements describing how the Consultant will perform the assignment:

1. Technical
Technical Proposals will contain, at a minimum: a) an executive summary b) a description of the approach to be taken in addressing the scope of work, c) a listing of the specific tasks required to properly perform the services, and d) a timeline from

Exhibit 2 173

inception to completion. (ECRG funding ends June 29, 2024)

2. Management and Staffing
Describe the management and staffing configuration to be utilized to complete the scope of work. Resumes of all proposed personnel must be included. The proposal must indicate who will have primary responsibility for this project and experience on similar projects.

3. Prior Related Firm Experience
Firms or individuals must demonstrate competence, experience, and capability to satisfactorily perform the scope of work within the grant funding duration. A description of the Firm's related work experiences should be included.

A list of at least three (3) recent references, including local government agencies where a similar service is or has been provided and any private clients, including names and telephone numbers of the firm and the key managers and professionals assigned to the project.

4. Cost and Pricing
Proposals shall include staff hourly rates, plus overhead, fees, travel and any additional project costs proposed. Prices quoted must remain firm throughout the contract period.

Cost proposals for scope of services 1 - 4 must be submitted with the proposal and all items must be itemized in detail. The approximate costs should be based on specified assumptions and experience within similar projects.

In addition, an hourly fee schedule shall be submitted with the proposal. In the event that the scope of work is substantially modified, the extra cost or credit shall be negotiated based on the submitted hourly rates.

5. Additions or Exceptions
A single and separate section with the heading "ADDITIONS OR EXCEPTIONS TO THE CITY'S REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL" containing a complete and detailed description of all the consultant's exceptions to the provisions and conditions of the attached City contract.

Exhibit 2 174

EVALUATION CRITERIA
The award of this agreement will be made to the most qualified firm/individual whose proposal complies with the prescribed requirements. The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals, and to waive any technical errors, irregularities, or discrepancies, if to do so is deemed to serve the best interests of the City. In no event will an award be made until all necessary investigations are made as to the responsibility and qualifications of the firm/individual(s) to whom it is proposed to make such award.

Proposals will be reviewed and evaluated by Community Development Director and City staff, and ranked based on the following considerations:
• Demonstrate familiarity with site conditions (recent site reports are available on Envirostore)
• Technical approach to scope of work
• Experience of proposed personnel and the firm in providing remediation and administration services
• Minority Ownership/Employment as defined by the County of Los Angeles Community Development Authority and HUD
• Cost and pricing and City's agreement with the consultant's proposed revisions to the City contract
If further clarifications or negotiations are required, on-site interviews may be conducted.

Participation in these interviews will be at the expense of the individual firms. The Selection Panel will be made up of staff members or representatives from the City. Recommendations will be forwarded to the City Council for final selection and award.

Proposals failing to provide sufficient information and assurances of performance to adequately assess each category of the required services and/or failing to comply with the requirements and conditions of this RFP may not be given further consideration.

Each proposal will be considered along with those of other responding firms, with respect to ability to perform effectively and efficiently those tasks outlined above and within the grant funding duration.

Close coordination with the City is required to assure that all requirements will be met. The City reserves the right to withdraw this RFP at any time without any prior notice. Further, the City makes no representations that any Agreement will be awarded to any Consultant responding to this RFP. The City expressly reserves the right to postpone reviewing the proposals for its own convenience and to reject any and all proposals responding to this RFP without indicating any reasons for such rejection(s).

Exhibit 2 175

EXHIBIT "B"

CONSULTANT PROPOSAL
Exhibit 2 1$6

wood.
3560 Hyland Avenue,Suite 100
Costa Mesa,California 92626
USA
T:949-642-0245
August 15, 2022 www.woodpic.com
22PROPGOVT.0282
City Clerk's Office
Attention: Ms.Vanessa Quiroz,Acting City Clerk
ECRG/ENV RFP Response
City of Bell Gardens
7100 Garfield Avenue
Bell Gardens,CA 90201
Subject: Proposal for Equitable Community Revitalization Grant Environmental Remediation Consultation
5600-5636 Shull Street
Former Berk Oil Site
Dear Ms. Quiroz,
The former Berk Oil site has long been a focus for environmental investigation, remediation,and redevelopment planning.

Since 2011,Wood Environment& Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. has worked hand-in-hand with the City of Bell Gardens (City) and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)to characterize the site conditions and make recommendations for site cleanup.The Equitable Community Revitalization Grant(ECRG) given to the City by DTSC will further the progress of cleaning the site for future redevelopment.Wood is here to help the City utilize the funds as efficiently as possible and meet the tight schedule of June 29,2024.

Enclosed, please find two bound and one unbound copy of our proposal for this effort.We emailed an electronic version to the addresses noted in the City's Request for Proposal (RFP).

We are here to help the City with this challenging site and look forward to our continued relationship.Should you have any questions, please contact Joe Bande, PG,our proposed project manager,at(949) 642-0245.

Sincerely,
Reviewed by:

Joseph Bande, PG 7058 Craig Stewart, PG 4087,CHG 106,CEG 1277 Principal Geologist Principal Hydrogeologist
i_MARKET\Proposals\2022 Proposals\22PROPGOVT.0282\Cover Letter.docx\TAN Attachment: Proposal for Environmental Remediation Consultation for Former Berk Oil Site ood'is a trading name for John Wood Group PLC and its subsidiaries Exhibit y 177

Ms.Vanessa Quiroz,Acting City Clerk
City of Bell Gardens
August 15,2022

The information contained in all pages of this Proposal shall not be used in whole or in part for any purpose other than to evaluate this Proposal.

Provided a Contract is awarded to this offer,as a result of or in connection with the submission of such information,City of Bell Gardens shall have the right to duplicate, use,or disclose the information to the extent provided in the resulting Contract. This restriction does not limit City of Bell Gardens'right to use information contained in this Proposal if it is obtained from another source without restriction. The information subject to this restriction incorporates the entire Proposal.

As a global business operating in a transparent and ethical manner, we respect the privacy rights of individuals and are committed to handling personal information responsibly and in accordance with applicable law. The Client acknowledges that Wood's proposal might contain CVs and personal data of individuals. Wood expects the Client to use these data for the sole purpose of the evaluation of Wood's proposal and in strict accordance with the requirements of the EU General Data Protection Regulation(GDPR).In particular, the Client(i)will not share the personal data received from Wood with any third party,(ii)will take appropriate technical and organizational measures to protect such personal data, which will be accessible,in order to ensure the necessary level of security,only to Client's personnel who have a need to review the data to evaluate Wood's bid,and(iii)will immediately destroy any personal data received by Wood in the event that the Contract is eventually not awarded to Wood.

Exhibit 2 178

(,0`1
. ,��➢�P11. Proposal
Environmental Remediation Consultation for Former Berk Oil Site Yr
Table of Contents

1.0 Technical Proposal............................................................................................................ 2

1.1 Executive Summary...........................................................................................................................2

1.2 Approach to Scope of Work............................................................................................................3

1.3 Scope of Work Tasks.........................................................................................................................3

1.4 Project Timeline.................................................................................................................................9

2.0 Management and Staffing ............................................................................................. 11

2.1 Project Manager............................................................................................................................. 11

2.2 Lead Engineer................................................................................................................................. 12

2.3 Technical Review............................................................................................................................ 12

2.4 Task Leads....................................................................................................................................... 12

3.0 Prior Related Firm Experience........................................................................................ 15

4.0 Cost and Pricing ..............................................................................................................20

5.0 Additions or Exceptions.................................................................................................. 23 ��� � � V���� I III Illlooluomiirz � � �� „ � �� 08 uuu uuuuu uuu8uu6�V OVV V�OV�uom� I
I
� e
I
r
v

(,0`1
. ,��➢�P1'. Proposal
Environmental Remediation Consultation for Former Berk Oil Site 4r

1.0 Technical Proposal
On behalf of the City of Bell Gardens (City), the Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. (Wood) team of highly qualified staff has worked together with the State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the National Development Council (NDC) to provide environmental technical support services at the former Berk Oil and Pacific Metal Craft (PMC) site (site or subject property) since 2011.

No other consulting firm has more hands-on, direct experience in understanding and evaluating site conditions, identifying and addressing environmental data gaps, and evaluating work necessary to prepare the site for redevelopment.The key technical staff identified in this submittal include the primary authors of the Revised Supplemental Site Assessment and Human Health Risk Assessment Report (SSA Report) dated July 13, 2022, which forms the basis of proposed site remediation to allow for mixed use (commercial/industrial and residential) redevelopment of this idle and unproductive property in the City.

Wood has a solid understanding of the site work to be conducted under the City's Equitable Community Revitalization Grant (ECRG) being administered by DTSC. We have provided services to State agencies under similar contracts, which have included adherence with grant reporting requirements and compliance with small businesses and disadvantaged business enterprises. Our work on previous grant- funded projects has also included soliciting subcontractor services under California prevailing wage determinations. Our submittal, prepared in response to the City's Request for Proposal (RFP), is organized as follows:

Section 1 describes our project approach, management of ECRG tasks, and roadmap to project success.

Section 2 identifies key Wood staff resources and describes their anticipated project roles and relevant experience.

Section 3 describes four projects Wood has completed involving working with State regulators under grant funding. These projects have involved preparation of remediation planning and contracting documents (including public outreach and selection of qualified subcontractors) and eventual site closure/redevelopment.

Section 4 provides our proposed staffing rates and a cost estimate based on experience working with California regulators at similar sites.

Section 5 notes any exceptions or additions to the City's contract.

Wood is prepared to begin ECRG implementation upon the City's authorization. 1f '1f Illlww,�� °��u°��iiu Stu uir�i�riu uir�i�riu� uir In 2022, Wood completed the SSA Report, which summarized historical and recent investigation results, included a human health risk assessment (HHRA), and proposed remedial actions intended to allow for unrestricted reuse of the former Berk Oil site. The proposed remedial actions included removal of shallow soils containing lead or benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) at concentrations exceeding residential cleanup goals. The SSA also noted that some form of vapor intrusion (VI) mitigation likely would be needed as part of site Exhibit 2 180

(,0`1
. ,��➢�P1'. Proposal
Environmental Remediation Consultation for Former Berk Oil Site 4r
redevelopment due to the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in soil gas at concentrations exceeding potentially applicable screening levels. Such mitigation might include vapor barriers and/or sub-slab venting beneath new buildings and would involve long-term operation, maintenance, and monitoring (OM&M) to verify the effectiveness of the measures. Other alternative VI mitigation measures were presented including focused soil vapor extraction (SVE) or alternative construction methods (e.g., raised building foundations or below-grade parking).While these measures were discussed with DTSC staff, staff from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) now overseeing the site work under the ECRG may have other requirements for site redevelopment.

Wood is ready to assist the City with continued environmental investigation, remediation planning, and remedy implementation to support the City's plans for site redevelopment. Our proposed approach and scope of work are described in the following subsections. . 1plpiiroacIhto Scqpea iurlllk
Scheduling will be a key component to the successful implementation of ECRG activities due to the short duration of the ECRG (which expires June 29, 2024). Because the RWQCB is new to the site, Wood's historical knowledge and firsthand experience with site conditions will be extremely important when addressing the RWQCB's questions and requests and in keeping their focus on site remediation and closure.

Another key component to the successful implementation of ECRG activities is availability of a highly qualified and experienced project team with available resources to implement ECRG-funded activities within the available schedule.As described in this proposal, our approach to successful project completion involves identifying and assigning technical staff with previous experience at the site and/or with successful experience with similar projects.
.3 Scqpe of WaHk lll['aslk
This section describes the scope of work Wood expects to complete for the project. Subsections 1.3.1 through 1.3.7 describe how we plan to accomplish Tasks 1 through 7 listed in the RFP. Based on data collected to date and presented in the SSA Report, we expect site remediation will include excavation and off-site disposal of shallow soil impacted by lead and/or BaP, which will provide conditions suitable for unrestricted site use in relation to soil.The SSA Report recommended installation of vapor barriers and sub-slab venting systems beneath new buildings with slab-on-grade construction to mitigate VI concerns associated with VOCs in soil gas. The RWQCB has provided preliminary input that it may require SVE or other more active form of VI mitigation prior to site redevelopment. Based on initial discussion with the RWQCB and depending on the results of Tasks 1 through 3 below, site remediation may also include design, construction, and Operations, Maintenance & Monitoring (OM&M) of an SVE system to reduce concentrations of VOCs in soil gas prior to redevelopment. Remedy performance monitoring and verification (SVE system monitoring and rebound testing, and/or monitoring of any long-term VI mitigation measures) will likely be required and may extend beyond the period of grant funding availability.

In addition to the specific tasks outlined in the RFP, our experience with similar projects indicates other tasks will become necessary during the project. Potential additional information requirements from the RWQCB are discussed at the end of this section.

Exhibit 2 181

(,0`1
. ,��➢�P1'. Proposal
Environmental Remediation Consultation for Former Berk Oil Site 4r

1.3.1 Task 1 - Data Gap Identification
This task will involve review of available site information in context of the City's redevelopment goals and plans and identification of data gaps that will need to be addressed prior to or along with site redevelopment. Based on information summarized in the SSA Report and on input provided to date by the RWQCB, we have identified two general data gap categories.

The first category comprises data gaps with a direct bearing on short-term remedy selection and design.

These are data gaps that need to be addressed to support final selection, design, and implementation of remedial actions to enable redevelopment of the site. Data gaps identified in this category include the:
• Lateral and vertical extent of shallow soil containing lead or BaP at concentrations exceeding residential cleanup goals in a few specific areas of the site • Chemical and physical characteristics of material used to backfill prior excavations at the site and its potential impact on site redevelopment plans
• Impact of current soil vapor conditions on site development plans (VI concerns) These remedy selection and design data gaps will be evaluated and addressed during Tasks 2 and 3 described below.

The second category comprises data gaps that will need to be addressed to complete site characterization to support decisions regarding whether longer-term monitoring or management of site conditions will be necessary. Based on initial input from the RWQCB, we have identified current groundwater conditions as a data gap in this category. Based on that input, we anticipate additional data will be needed to characterize the:
• Current soil vapor conditions at depths greater than previously sampled • Presence and extent of shallow/perched groundwater beneath the site • Presence and concentrations of VOCs in shallow/perched groundwater and the next deeper (regionally extensive) groundwater zone
• Potential presence and concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) in groundwater because of historical site activities and/or of known release of petroleum products at the nearby Vinvale Terminal
These site characterization data gaps will involve field investigation and laboratory analysis pursuant to an RWQCB-approved work plan to obtain additional data to characterize soil, soil gas, and groundwater conditions at the site.The scope of work for this task will be defined in part based on the discussions with the RWQCB in Task 2 described below. Some of the data collected as part of this task may be used during remedy selection and design.

1.3.2 Task 2 - Interaction with DTSC/RWQCB Regarding Project Site This task will include participation in a site visit with DTSC and RWQCB staff and initial interaction with RWQCB personnel as they become more familiar with project history, available data, and overall site conditions.This task will also include initial discussion with RWQCB staff of data gaps and proposed additional work discussed during Task 1.

NOR 1
Exhibit 2 182

(,0`1
. ,��➢�P1'. Proposal
Environmental Remediation Consultation for Former Berk Oil Site 4r

1.3.3 Task 3 - Preparation of a RAP
Wood has prepared numerous Remedial Action Plan (RAPS) and other remedy selection documents under RWQCB, DISC, EPA Brownfields, and other regulatory programs. For this project, Wood will consider applicable RWQCB requirements and relevant guidance documents to tailor and prepare a RAP for project-specific conditions.Although for some projects a feasibility study (FS) may be prepared as a separate document to support remedy evaluation and selection prior to a RAP, we expect that the RWQCB will agree these steps can be combined into a single document (RAP) to expedite work within the period of grant funding availability.

For this project, our familiarity with site conditions and information in the SSA Report indicate that excavation and off-site disposal of soil likely will be a preferred remedy for shallow soil impacted by lead or BaR and SVE or a similar method likely will be the preferred remedy for VOCs in soil gas. Excavation and SVE are both considered "presumptive remedies" by the EPA and other regulatory agencies.As such, they can be selected for use in a project without the level of detailed analysis and justification that may be required for other technologies. We have used this "presumptive remedy" approach on other projects with the RWQCB and expect to follow a similar approach to streamline the RAP for the site.

We anticipate the RAP will be submitted for public review after the RWQCB's initial review (see Task 4 below). The RAP will be considered "final" once the public review processes is complete, after which implementation of the proposed remedy can begin.

1.3.4 Task 4 - Public Outreach Assistance
Public outreach through DTSC and RWQCB is an integral part of the State's efforts to investigate and clean up hazardous waste sites throughout California. Clear concise documents are essential to establishing a two-way communication process between state agencies and the public.Wood has a great deal of experience in assisting in the preparation of public outreach documents, including those required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Upon RWQCB approval, the draft RAP will be submitted for public review. Based on our previous experience providing public outreach assistance to DTSC or the RWQCB, Wood anticipates that the public participation documents for the project will include:
• Community Survey
• Fact Sheets
Wood will retain Printing Resources, a third-party vendor, to develop a mailing list of local community members in the site area, and elected officials and other mandatory organizations.A community survey and fact sheet will be provided to individuals and businesses within a '/4-miles radius of the site in both English and Spanish. Following the typical 30-day public review period, Wood will assist the RWQCB with preparation of a Response to Comments letter. The Response to Comments letter will be returned to all individuals/organization that provided comments on the draft RAP.

Depending on the number of public comments received and the level of public support for site redevelopment, the RWQCB may choose to hold a public meeting or community workshop to solicit additional feedback from the community. Although Wood does not anticipate this level of effort will be needed, our team also has experience in meeting with and presenting to community members and elected officials in both informal and more formal settings and has participated in outreach efforts in low- Exhibit 2 183

(,0`1
. ,��➢�P1'. Proposal
Environmental Remediation Consultation for Former Berk Oil Site 4r
income communities with environmental justice concerns.

Following completion of public outreach efforts, the RAW will be revised to incorporate RWQCB changes and subsequently considered a "final" document, allowing Wood to begin Task 5 activities noted below.

1.3.5 Task 5 - Prepare Design Documents and Plans, and Procure Subcontractors Wood has strong in-house capabilities for design of excavations and soil, soil gas, and groundwater remediation systems. Our experienced design staff represent civil, geotechnical, chemical, and environmental engineers who incorporate input from other disciplines (such as mechanical, structural, and electrical engineering, hydrology, and geology) where needed.

Following RWQCB approval of the "final" RAP, Wood will begin preparing design documents and plans to support soil excavation activities and construction and operation of VI barriers and/or SVE (depending on the final selected remedy for VOCs in soil gas). Implementation of the selected remedy will consist of several phases, including design, construction, start-up, OM&M, post-remediation monitoring, decommissioning, and restoration. Preliminary (30%), intermediate (60%), and pre-final (90%) plans will be prepared for review. The Final Design is a culmination of the 30%, 60%, and 90% plans, and contains final design, details, drawings, specifications, and appendices for remedy implementation.Appendices will include:
• Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan
• Air/Dust Monitoring and Mitigation Plan
• Decontamination Plan
• OM&M Plan
• Soil Management Plan
Engineering and design documents will be checked, reviewed, and signed by the licensed civil engineer in responsible charge. Mechanical, structural, and electrical engineers will all stamp their respective drawings, where present.

Concurrent with preparing design documents and plans, Wood's construction management services can also assist the City with preparation of bid specifications, bid evaluation, and contractor selection and procurement. Selection of remediation subcontractors is open to competitive bid pursuant to ECRG requirements.Wood will prepare standard specifications that will encourage open and reasonable competition by establishing measurable project performance and quality levels (e.g., detailed list of characteristics, such as: sizes, physical dimensions, weights, types and grades of materials, standard of workmanship, basic design).The selected remediation contractor(s)will assist Wood with obtaining permits (Task 6) and preparing additional supporting documents, such as traffic control, air monitoring, and health and safety plans. Further, the contractor will demonstrate compliance with State regulations for working with lead impacted soil (hazardous waste management) before remediation activities begin.

1.3.6 Task 6 - Obtain Permits and Approvals
Most engineering plans and specifications must obtain appropriate permits and agency approvals before subsurface disturbance or construction of remediation systems can begin.A grading and trenching permit will likely be necessary from the City and the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal/OSHA) before remedial excavation of contaminated soil and placement of engineered fill begins.

Permits anticipated for installation and operation of an SVE system, include:

Exhibit 2 184

(,0`1
. ,��➢�P1'. Proposal
Environmental Remediation Consultation for Former Berk Oil Site 4r
• Building permits, which will cover grading, trenching, electrical installation, and building construction • Encroachment permits for any road crossings
• Drilling permits for SVE wells
• Electrical engineering plans to apply for new electrical service • A South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) permit to construct/operate for discharge of treated soil gas from the granular activated carbon vessels to the atmosphere Agency approvals associated with design and construction planning may include coordinating the remediation system layout, work areas, and work schedules to accommodate community limitations.

Design and construction plans will also need to consider proposed property redevelopment plans from the City and/or builder. A process hazard analysis will be performed to evaluate potential process hazards and propose recommendations for managing risks associated with those hazards. Wood can assist the City with managing any system installation, beginning with preparation of initial permit applications (SCAQMD and appropriate local agencies such as County Building, Planning, Health, and Fire Departments) through contractor selection, construction observation and project coordination, inspection, and start-up. Once a system is constructed and operational, Wood can assist with OM&M, performance monitoring, optimization, and verification and reporting of results.When the system has achieved its intended results, we can provide decommissioning and site restoration as needed and will prepare completion documents and final report(s) as described for Task 7.

1.3.7 Task 7 - Prepare Final Report
A construction completion report will be prepared once all physical construction, operations, and verification sampling required for site cleanup have been completed. Final site closure documents may include results of post-remediation confirmation samples and a post-remediation HHRA to demonstrate the residual chemical concentrations do not pose a risk to human health or the environment under expected future site conditions. The final report(s) will be prepared toward the end of the ECRG timeframe.

The final goal of any remediation project is to seek and obtain "closure"from the agency providing regulatory oversight. Wood anticipates the RWQCB may issue a No Further Action (NFA) determination for BaP and lead in soil. However, an NFA determination for residual VOCs in soil gas may be not feasible within the ECRG timeframe.Thus, a post construction OM&M plan may be necessary for continuing VI mitigation.

Additional reporting likely will be necessary pursuant to permit requirements.The City, as permit holder, will be responsible for confirming that conditions and monitoring requirements of all permits were followed. Wood anticipates that the selected remediation contractor(s) will prepare final reports documenting monitoring and compliance with permit conditions on behalf of the City.

Key Uncertainties
In addition to identification of specific technical data gaps in Task 1, we expect to identify more general questions and uncertainties that the City and RWQCB will need to resolve to allow the project to proceed on schedule. Potential uncertainties we have identified during initial communications with the RWQCB and development of this proposal include:

Exhibit 2 185

('0`1
. ,�➢�P1'. Proposal
Environmental Remediation Consultation for Former Berk Oil Site 4r

1. Will the RWQCB require NFA status for soil and soil gas prior to site redevelopment, or will redevelopment be allowed to proceed if an NFA status is not in place, but human health is protected through institutional and engineering controls?Although achieving NFA status prior to redevelopment would be ideal, it may not be feasible within the schedule for the ECRG. Removal of VOCs from fine-grained soils (such as those present at the site) using SVE typically requires many months, and often years, of SVE operation. In addition, several months of post-SVE monitoring and rebound testing are typically required before the RWQCB will consider granting NFA status. Other technologies (such as deep excavation or in situ thermal treatment) might remove VOCs from soil more quickly once begun but will require more time for planning and permitting and/or will be prohibitively expensive.As indicated in the SSA Report, some form of VI mitigation likely will be needed as part of site redevelopment. VI mitigation can be accomplished, however, without a site being granted NFA status. Such mitigation might include vapor barriers and/or sub-slab venting beneath new buildings and involves long-term OM&M to verify the effectiveness of the measures.

Alternative building construction using ground floor parking garages (podium parking) or below- grade parking garages could be used to address VI concerns by increasing ventilation. The City and the RWQCB will need to agree on an approach that achieves as much remediation as feasible within the term of the ECRG, but also recognize the potential need for ongoing measures to maintain protective conditions after that time.

2. What cleanup goals for VOCs in soil gas will be agreed on by the RWQCB and the City?As noted in the SSA Report, DTSC and EPA currently apply different assumptions in calculation of risks associated with VI of VOCs from soil gas to indoor air. Consequently, cleanup goals for soil gas may be more stringent under EPA guidelines than under DTSC guidelines.The RWQCB has indicated that it will apply EPA guidelines as a default.As an alternative, however, it may be possible to develop site- specific cleanup goals for soil gas that account for the design and use of future on-site buildings and provide a level of protection satisfactory to the RWQCB, DTSC, and the City.The process and timing for establishment of cleanup goals and mitigation measures for soil gas will need to be agreed on prior to selection of a remedy for soil gas at the site.

3. What specific land uses and building designs are the City considering for site redevelopment? This is an important question because some types of building construction and use (e.g., podium and below-grade parking beneath new buildings, or use of ground floor space only for commercial purposes) may affect the extent of remediation required and the need for additional longer-term mitigation measures to address potential future VI risks to site occupants.

4. How much additional work will the RWQCB require?The SSA Report and previous phases of work at the site have been done under the oversight of DTSC.The RWQCB, however, is the lead agency for work to be conducted under the ECRG.Although these two agencies work to protect human health and the environment, their requirements and approaches differ, and the RWQCB may request work that has not been required by DTSC. The type(s) and amount of additional work requested by the RWQCB, and the timing of that work in relation to other work needed to support site redevelopment, is not currently known, but will need to be identified and agreed on by the City and the RWQCB.

We will begin the review and communications to address these general questions as part of Tasks 1 and 2 but expect this work will continue beyond the specified scope, effort, and schedule for those tasks.

Exhibit 2 186

('0`1
. ,��➢�P1'. Proposal
Environmental Remediation Consultation for Former Berk Oil Site 4r
1 ) ject ''III[Iuirnirriu elllliiin
Figure 1 provides a detailed schedule from contract award through the end of the ECRG timeframe (June 29, 2024). The key components of the schedule include:
• Prepare RAP and obtain approval
• Implement approved remedy
• Address remaining data gaps
Wood will identify and evaluate remaining data gaps (soil, soil gas, and groundwater conditions) concurrently with preparation and approval of the RAP to save time. Construction of VI barriers is not included because this work would need to be coordinated with the builder/owner development plans.

Exhibit 2 187

v¢ a
v�
N¢
0 'o
Mz
�o
v
o
a '
E M¢
N
O �............

U -
w '
O
a
c
C9
0 o �
'� ¢v
N
•] o 0
y a`
� in MLL
= o
J � 2
J �
o =
�O
w E
ry z —= o
J w
a ao - a
o
w � �
N � � LL o
n �
� N
m =,
� rv¢
I
.......

G1
U iz 4
fn _ E
NF LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL E E E E LL LL LL LL F a a a a LL O ~
Q ry ry ry ry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v v v . . . . . . . M v O
' m C0
a _
O
K O N C
i
O O C C OJ u
LL O '^ C o J U v C
t �n _ O C O
w 'uE O.3 3 ° Q u O 0 o ° .o ° � U O o ,. ' cc owowE cv � o ?
w mc a °acc v OlDta 7' ° w v
c
u v. > -m`o ` v rco -oo o E a rco J E on a a a�i ova ~ O
o ° O N uO C c0 m+ sue+ 3v E) O CE - ' m 0 ° O +v
� w ccbA
bA C m E EO c:E a vw vcw w E ov v v E o �_
E o a v v ° v v v v — E c Z J LL J O J O w O E w v v O. O. C O c w a a a - a a s a U �n o a a v` U a Q a E E m Y� o a E v `
F U Y V1 z
Elm E- �m �F �v ��2 "m
V 9
d 0 L
X
W

(,0`1
. ,�➢�P1'. Proposal
Environmental Remediation Consultation for Former Berk Oil site 4r

2.0 Management and Staffing
Wood will provide appropriate staff and other resources to assist the City with its efforts to prepare the site for redevelopment within the schedule and funding available through the ECRG . Our team has worked together for many years and has completed many similar projects. Figure 2 provides an organization chart showing the proposed project team and roles. Biographical sketches for the team members are provided below and resumes for the key individuals are provided in Appendix A of this submittal.

Figure 2 — Organization Chart
to
--------------------
auumryp
}j�uiu�uuuu�ll�m�
Joseph Bande, PG Calvin Hardcastle, PIE
Craig Stewart, IPG, CHG,CEG
rGhMarles"Blanchard, PE
�u
f. I)ulrgjec ° II Ilaiina aulr
Joseph Bande, PG
Wood's Project Manager, Joseph Bande, will have primary responsibility for this project. He has more than 29 years of professional experience investigating and remediating contaminated soil, soil gas, and groundwater and has served as the project manager on DTSC contracts for 18 years. He has managed and implemented almost all of the aspects of site investigations and hazardous waste remediation activities needed to manage the City's ECRG (e.g., preparation of work plans and site investigation report, safety plans, hydrogeologic evaluations, data evaluation, risk assessment, soil and groundwater cleanup planning, public participation, preparation of site remediation and closure documents (RAP/Removal Action Workplan [RAW]), site closure). Joe was one of the lead authors of the SSA.

Exhibit 2 189

(,0`1
. ,��➢�P1'. Proposal
Environmental Remediation Consultation for Former Berk Oil Site 4r
As the current project manager for the DTSC Cypress Region contract, Joe is familiar with the technical and administrative aspects of work under DTSC grants. He will work with the City to develop project goals and objectives to address specific environmental concerns during each milestone of site investigation and remediation progress. In his proposed role, Joe will manage the appropriate skilled and experienced Wood staff assigned to this project, and will identify subcontractors, if needed. He will also lead Wood's response to proposed scopes of work provided by the City or RWQCB, and will estimate the level of effort and costs for completion of the scopes, without exceeding the total authorized grant budget funding.

1.6 eaclIlllww,uirml Guuirmi uir
Charles Blanchard, PE
Charles has more than 31 years of experience in active remediation and extensive experience managing the design, installation, operation, and optimization of remediation programs. His experience includes pilot testing, system design, equipment procurement, construction oversight, system optimization and project closeout on a wide variety of projects.

Much of the focus Charles' work has been the pilot testing, design, installation, and operation of SVE systems. In the last decade, he has applied these same skills to the design, installation, and operation of several subslab ventilation and barrier systems.

I " f' °II[iiimi aII I i oir
Calvin H. Hardcastle, PE — Engineering
Calvin Hardcastle will provide engineering technical lead services to this project. He has more than 41 years of process and environmental engineering experience, and has worked in environmental consulting for the past 35 years. Calvin's expertise includes identification and evaluation of remediation strategies to address contaminated soil, soil gas, and groundwater. He will also assist in developing a site closure strategy to support the City's site reuse planning.

Craig Stewart, PG, CHG, CEG — Site Investigation/Hydrogeology Craig Stewart has more than 40 years of professional experience and will provide input and technical review on site investigation and overall project strategy. He has managed and conducted soil and groundwater characterizations, remedial investigations, remedial action planning, and remediation of sites where soils and groundwater were contaminated by fuel hydrocarbons, solvents, metals, oilfield wastes, or pesticides. Craig has experience working with DISC, EPA, and RWQCB regulatory staff. He provided principal-level technical review for the SSA and will continue to provide technical and strategic review and input for this project.

1.8 ['as kllll, ac�i
Shiow-Whei Chou, PE — Engineering Services
Ms. Shiow-Whei Chou has worked at Wood for 23 years and has experience in environmental engineering and consulting. Her expertise includes hazardous waste site investigation and remediation; design, construction, and implementation of remedial technologies; and project management. She has managed or served as a technical task lead for projects involving design, construction, and implementation of various remedial measures; OM&M of soil and groundwater remediation systems; system optimization; Exhibit 2 190

(,0`1
. ,��➢�P1'. Proposal
Environmental Remediation Consultation for Former Berk Oil Site 4r
regulatory compliance and permitting; and site closures. Shiow-Whei's extensive experience working with the California RWQCBs, EPA, and DISC, participating in remedy selection and evaluation documents, overseeing remediation contractors, and achieving site closures will benefit the City in pursuing its goals for site reuse.

Daney Saylor, PH, PE - Engineering Services
Daney has worked at Wood for 21 years and has more than 22 years of experience in engineering and environmental consulting. He has served in key roles in a wide variety of civil engineering and environmental remediation projects including civil engineering, water distribution system modeling, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis and modeling, construction management, stormwater, design of soil and groundwater remediation systems, OM&M of treatment systems, engineering FSs, engineering cost estimates, and plans and specifications. Daney's background and experience will benefit the project in work such as preparation of design drawings and specifications, assistance with preparation of bid documents and review of contractor bids for selection of qualified remediation contractors, and overall support for the City's efforts to complete project work using ECRG funding.

Susan Rebellon, PE — Engineering Services
Susan is an environmental professional with experience in environmental remediation, environmental compliance, and civil engineering. Her focus at Wood includes providing support for design, cost estimation, construction, and OM&M work related to groundwater, soil, and soil vapor treatment and containment systems.This includes scoping/designing treatment systems, overseeing compliance with various environmental permit and other regulatory requirements, and performing spatial and temporal data analysis to evaluate contaminant distribution.

She also has specialized expertise in the investigation and clean up of contaminated sites and a history of advising clients on environmental compliance, liability, and cost recovery matters. Susan is highly knowledgeable of federal, state, and local environmental regulations, including the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and Clean Water Act, as well as hazardous waste, stormwater, and other environmental requirements.

Jorge Perez, PG—Site Investigation
Mr. Jorge Perez has worked at Wood for nine years supervising soil, soil gas, and groundwater investigations. As the investigation task leader, he will assist the project manager in identifying appropriate Wood staff resources and will manage soil, soil gas, and/or groundwater investigations and sampling events. He is experienced in groundwater monitoring well and soil vapor probe installation and has supervised the collection of groundwater, soil gas, and soil samples using a wide variety of techniques.Jorge has overseen previous investigation at Berk Oil and will continue to provide services under the ECRG.

Caryn Kelly— Risk Assessment
Caryn is a principal toxicologist who has more than 24 years of experience in toxicology, HHRAs, and toxics regulations compliance and has worked at Wood for more than 23 years. She was the primary author of the HHRA that was completed along with the recent SSA Report for the site. She has performed risk assessments to evaluate the potential for adverse health effects associated with the presence of a range of industrial and naturally occurring constituents in soil, air, and water for the RWQCB, DISC, and Exhibit 2 191

(,0`1
. ,��➢�P1'. Proposal
Environmental Remediation Consultation for Former Berk Oil Site 4r
EPA. By working closely with state and federal regulatory personnel, Caryn has successfully completed these evaluations in compliance with risk assessment methodologies prescribed by the Cal/EPA and various state and federal regulatory agencies. Caryn will continue to provide HHRA services under the ECRG.

Tim Reinhardt, CIH — Health & Safety
Tim has worked at Wood for 16 years and has more than 39 years of experience in industrial hygiene and EH&S compliance. He has a comprehensive knowledge of EH&S compliance regulations and manages occupational and public health studies critical to EH&S compliance.Tim manages EH&S compliance and serves as health &safety officer for Wood and serves as an internal compliance resource when questions arise. Tim's background and experience will be utilized during implementation of ECRG activities to safely and efficiently implement the selected site remedy for the City.

Mahesh Mettu, PE — Construction Oversight
Mr. Mahesh Mettu has more than 20 years of environmental consulting and project management experience with private and public-sector clients. He currently oversees and serves as a Project Manager on the record for a DTSC site involving an Imminent and Substantial Endangerment Order(RAO). He has prepared soil and groundwater management plans and provided excavation oversight for soils impacted with VOCs. In addition, Mahesh has experience with supported permitting and SVE design documentation preparation and groundwater remediation, treatment, and reuse system OM&M contracts. He has prepared RAPS, evaluated remediation technologies, and provided construction oversight for soil, soil gas, and groundwater remediation systems involving a wide range of remediation technologies. Mahesh has also performed annual barrier system (cap) review and conducted barrier system performance evaluations, including a five-year review of a barrier system for a site with a land use covenant.

Exhibit 2 192

('0`1
. ,��➢�P1'. Proposal
Environmental Remediation Consultation for Former Berk Oil Site 4r

3.0 Prior Related Firm Experience
Wood has the in-house resources to perform or provide all of the technical services associated with the site redevelopment project tasks described in the RFP. Wood has been working at the Berk Oil site since 2011 and assisting the City with project redevelopment planning since that time. Below, we provide a summary of our experience work at the site, along with descriptions of similar projects recently completed in southern California representative of the scope of work outlined in the RFP.

Berk Oil and PMC Properties, City of Bell Gardens, California Wood has completed three significant site characterization and redevelopment planning projects at the site since 2012.These included:
2012 Targeted Site Investigation implemented on behalf of the City through a DTSC grant 2019 Site Characterization implemented on behalf of the City through a DTSC grant 2022 SSA Report and HHRA implemented on behalf of the City through an EPA grant (this investigation was funded through two EPA Brownfields grants being administered by NDC, a non- profit 50193)
Berk Oil conducted asphalt mixing and oil distribution operations in the western portion of the site from approximately 1965 through 1989. PMC occupied the eastern portion of the site and conducted metal and plastic parts fabrication between 1984 and the early 1990s. Previous site activities included use of underground storage tanks (USTs) and aboveground storage tanks, metal furnaces, and degreasers. In 1988, during excavation Relevant Scope Items:
of impacted soil, a large quantity of asphalt-tar sludge, oil- soaked concrete and debris, and several buried full oil drums Site Investigation were uncovered inside the former steam cleaning sump. 0 Risk Assessment Chemical analysis of soil revealed relatively high concentrations 0 Cleanup and of VOCs (primarily trichloroethene) and TPH. A total of 1,423 tons Redevelopment Evaluation of impacted soil were excavated and transported offsite.

Reportedly, not all impacted soil was excavated, and the former steam cleaning sump excavation was partially backfilled with some of the impacted soil. Since the early 1990s, the site has remained vacant and unused because of remaining
contamination and unknown
environmental conditions.

F1c5/c5renc s. Trt.ss Chesney, DT.G).F (714) 484--5479 During the 2012 and 2019 projects,
Wood (and our predecessor company
1:��rarr ra ._:�ra�;�,;�5r, 1�11:��.:� (;aCi.�;); 48.:~1--.(;�� ��.:} AMEC) was retained by DTSC to
implement additional site
characterization through a community-wide Brownfields assessment grant that DTSC received from EPA.

Wood prepared work plans to characterize soil, soil gas, and groundwater conditions at the site using innovative tools and techniques to expedite the site investigation.The site characterization and investigations were implemented to assess how environmental conditions associated with current or former land uses may affect redevelopment plans for future reuse of the site, specifically for proposed Exhibit 2 193

(,0`1
. ,��➢�P1'. Proposal
Environmental Remediation Consultation for Former Berk Oil Site 4r
commercial results planning. The 2019 Site Characterization Report provided recommendations for commercial/industrial reuse on a parcel-by-parcel basis.

In 2022, Wood completed the SSA Report to evaluate mixed-use development of the site, including residential development. Soil, soil gas, and groundwater conditions were evaluated using the same innovative tools and techniques. Results of the passive and active soil gas sampling, cone penetration testing, membrane interface hydraulic profile tool direct-read monitoring, and grab groundwater samples did not show significant VOC or TPH impacts to soil or groundwater at the site. However, to support site redevelopment decisions, an HHRA was performed to evaluate both commercial/industrial and residential (mixed) land use and calculate potential health risks posed by chemical of potential concern (COPCs).

Results of the HHRA demonstrated that exposure of future site occupants under both residential and commercial/industrial reuse scenarios to current soil and soil gas conditions would result in an elevated noncancer hazard and cancer risk.Thus, a Response Action would be required to allow for mixed-use site redevelopment. Based on HHRA calculations, the soil cleanup goals for these COPCs included the following:
• BaP toxicity equivalent quotient in soil: 0.90 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) for residential and industrial/commercial use
• Lead in soil: 80 mg/kg for residential use and 320 mg/kg for industrial/commercial use The SSA Report identified the estimated areas of lead and/or BaP soil excavation that, when removed, would allow for unrestricted use of site soil.

Results of the HHRA indicated risk management would be necessary for potential vapor intrusion beneath new slab-on-grade building construction. Because soil gas concentrations are relatively low and dispersed throughout the site, Wood recommended a physical barrier to prevent vapor intrusion from impacted media into new construction. Results and recommendation from the SSA Report were used by the City to obtain the ECRG.All project work was completed within the grant funding's deliverable schedule and authorized budget.

Pathway High School Independent Studies, Lynwood, California Wood was retained by the Lynwood Unified
School District (LUSD)to provide environmental
Ale.,f.,re' ce: Mom..iel_ orornt.'Ilo, f. e f erro, technical support services to assist LUSD and their 447--()996 consultant DelTerra with the Pathway High School Independent Studies project, which included site
evaluation and planning to install modular
classroom buildings on an underutilized portion of Hosler Middle School.Wood evaluated potential soil contamination that may have resulted from the use/application of lead-based paint (LBP) and organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) on and around former site buildings, and its impact on potential site redevelopment plans.The site was undeveloped or agricultural land through the 1940s when it was developed with buildings that initially were used for storage of military supplies. It was subsequently used by LUSD for storage of school supplies.These buildings also included a maintenance shop for minor auto repair and storage of related tools, equipment, and supplies. A 2,000-gallon gasoline UST and fuel dispenser, which had been operated as part of the vehicle maintenance activities, were removed from the site in 1989.The site buildings were demolished in early 2015 after asbestos containing materials and LBP abatement work had been completed.

Exhibit 2 194

(,0`1
. ,�➢�P1'. Proposal
Environmental Remediation Consultation for Former Berk Oil Site 4r
Wood collected soil samples in and around the former site building footprints as part of the lead and OCP investigation.The soil sample results were compared to appropriate DTSC or EPA soil screening levels for residential use. Lead and dieldrin were the only COPCs detected in soil at concentrations exceeding screening levels.

Wood assisted LUSD in negotiating a School Cleanup Agreement (Docket Number HSA-FY15/16-141) with DTSC to enable DTSC to oversee further environmental investigation and removal action (RA) at the site.Wood Relevant Scope Items:
subsequently prepared a Revised RAW on behalf of LUSD to address lead- and dieldrin-impacted soil at the site.The RAW Site Investigation identified and screened RA alternatives that could best achieve • Cleanup Planning the project Removal Action Objectives (RAOs) allowing for the proposed site redevelopment and unrestricted reuse. Based on Raw the evaluation and associated estimates of cost, excavation of Public Outreach lead- and dieldrin-impacted soils followed by transportation of 0 Preparation of Bid the impacted soil to an appropriate, permitted off-site facility for Specification treatment/disposal was identified as the preferred and 0 Selection of Remediation recommended RA alternative. The RAW also included Subcontractors supplemental plans for the safe and successful implementation of . Construction Oversight the proposed RA, including: During Soil Removal • QA/QC Plan • Closure Documentation
• Dust Monitoring and Mitigation Plan with NFA Approval • Decontamination Plan
DISC, acting as the Responsible Agency, approved the RAW for public review pursuant to CEQA. Wood assisted DTSC with preparation of a Community Profile, Community Survey, and Public Notice documents.

Following the public comment period, DTSC approved the RAW for implementation.

Wood prepared Technical Specifications to assist LUSD in retaining a qualified contractor to implement the approved RA. Subsequently, Wood provided as-needed construction oversight assistance and collected confirmation soil samples. Lead- and dieldrin-impacted soils were safely excavated and removed from the site and no significant field variances/deviations occurred during the RA activities. Confirmation soil sample results demonstrated the impacted soils were removed from the site and residual concentrations of COPCs, where detected, were below site-specific screening levels.The excavation areas were subsequently backfilled with imported fill material obtained from a DISC-approved source.

Completion of the RA and subsequent laboratory analyses demonstrated the project RAOs were achieved.

Subsequently, Wood prepared a Remedial Action Completion Report (RACK), which requested that DTSC concur with the recommendation that an NFA determination for the site was warranted. DTSC approved the RACR and concurred with Wood's request for NFA status for the site. The classroom buildings were installed in 2019.Wood completed the RAW and RACR on schedule, and through close collaboration with LUSD and DTSC representatives, saved an estimated $50,000 off our original projected project costs.

Exhibit 2 195

(,0`1
. ,�➢�P1'. Proposal
Environmental Remediation Consultation for Former Berk Oil Site 4r
Former Engineering Plating Facility, Santa Ana, California Relevant Scope Items: Wood was retained by DTSC to complete a site investigation and prepare a RAP for the former Engineering Plating Corporation (EPC) project site located at 1224 East Pomona Street where • Site Investigation relatively high concentrations of VOCs were detected in • Cleanup Planning groundwater, soil, soil gas, and indoor air samples. The project is • RAW being conducted pursuant to an Imminent and Substantial • Public Outreach Endangerment Determination Order issued by DTSC to the • Vapor Intrusion Mitigation current property owner. Shortly after EPC operations ceased in Using SVE the 1990s, the site property was subdivided into two separate addresses, 1224 and 1226 E. Pomona Street. The current site occupant at 1224 E. Pomona Street is a church group, and the current site occupant at 1226 E. Pomona Street is an automotive repair business.

Wood successfully implemented a triad-type approach to expedite site characterization and initiate a rapid response mitigation effort because high concentrations of VOCs were detected in soil gas and indoor air samples. Vapors were extracted from two vertical extraction wells screened between depths of approximately 15 and 30 feet and two horizontal extraction wells with approximately 60 to 70 lineal feet of screen and located approximately six feet underneath the site building. Subsequent soil gas and indoor air sampling results indicate that SVE has been effective for reducing VOC concentrations in soil gas beneath the site.

While onsite SVE planning and operations commenced, Wood continued onsite site and offsite groundwater sampling activities. Soil and groundwater samples were used for bench-scale treatability studies to evaluate effectiveness of in
situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) under
the site conditions. ISCO using sodium
Ale.,/e.,re.,rrc;e.,s: f=rnrad Ye.,rn�.,al, D1-.G:sC, (714) 484--543,".;. permanganate was considered more
applicable for focused treatment of the �.�c, '.... E E ) - c�,=} �:carL l.� ... .�ca� _:��... 6
VOCs in groundwater. The data
collected from SVE operation and ISCO
pilot studies were used to support remedy selection and design long-term remedial efforts.Wood prepared a RAP describing potential remedial alternatives to mitigate VOCs in soil, soil gas, and groundwater.The selected remedies included:
• SVE for treatment of VOCs in soil and soil gas
• ISCO with sodium permanganate for treatment of VOC-impacted groundwater • Containment (capping and subsurface depressurization • Monitored natural attenuation for treatment of remaining VOC-impacted groundwater • Institutional Controls during and/or after remedial implementation Wood assisted DTSC with public outreach efforts, which included preparing an initial study document, Fact Sheet, and public participation plan to support public review of the RAP pursuant to CEQA. Wood also assisted DTSC during preparation of the presentation materials and supported DTSC staff during their public meeting. The draft RAP was finalized upon receipt of final public comments.

All project work was completed within the funding's deliverable schedule and authorized budget.

Exhibit 2 196

('0`1
. ,�➢�P1'. Proposal
Environmental Remediation Consultation for Former Berk Oil Site 4r
Bethune Library, Los Angeles, California
Wood conducted a site investigation and prepared a RAW to support redevelopment planning for the former Bethune Library site at 3665 South Vermont Avenue, Los Angeles, California. The approximate

0.77-acre vacant site located adjacent to the University of Southern California campus is in a highly desirable location for development.

The site investigation was
implemented through a DTSC grant Ale'/e'rerrces. C-rISS Chesney, D- _`:)C (714) 484--5479 implemented on behalf of the City of
Los Angeles, Department of Public (-,C")l '(1 ' MC:rr5ll, .�... `: 1( /, r (F;;a .:,}; f, :',:,},,Ci
Works Bureau of Sanitation (LASAN)
Brownfields Program to assess
whether current or former land uses may affect redevelopment plans. Based on previous site operations, the COPCs that may have been used at the site and that present an environmental and/or human impact concern included VOCs, TPH, metals, acid, and semi-VOCs.

Wood collected soil and soil gas samples from the site following Relevant Scope Items: the site-specific Sampling and Analysis Plan. Results demonstrated that removal of lead-impacted soil was necessary • Site Investigation to allow for unrestricted reuse of the site property. Subsequently, • Cleanup Planning for Lead- Wood prepared a RAW to evaluate removal action alternatives impacted Soil and costs through the DTSC grant for hazardous substance sites. • RAW The RAW was prepared pursuant to California Health and Safety Code, Section 25356.1(h) to support cleanup and removal of released hazardous substances from the site.An estimated 4,945 cubic yards of lead-impacted soil was identified for removal from the site to allow for unrestricted reuse.The RAW described responsibilities of the selected contractor to designate a Certified Lead Supervisor pursuant to California Department of Public Health requirements. Other RAW components prepared by Wood included:
• QA/QC Plan
• Decontamination Plan
• Dust Control and Monitoring Plan
LASAN is using the agency-approved RAW to support redevelopment planning.

Exhibit 2 197

(,0`1
. ,��➢�P1'. Proposal
Environmental Remediation Consultation for Former Berk Oil Site 4r

4.0 Cost and Pricing
Wood has prepared a cost estimate for Tasks 1 through 4 based on our past experience working with DISC and the RWQCB. The task assumptions, some of which were discussed in Section 1.3.1, used to develop this estimate are listed below. i'a llk 'I kleintify Data Gallp ouirlllk IIII')Illlain • Review SSA
• Identify and confirm data gaps with RWQCB and/or DTSC • Prepare a supplemental work plan for implementing additional site investigation activities 'lll['a slllk 2 . Site Visit
• Prepare hand-outs for agency staff
• Wood PM and one Task Lead will participate in the site visit (including travel) Tasks 7 and 2 will be conducted concurrently with preparation of the RAP to save time(see Figure 2 - Proposed Project Schedule).
'lli'a slllk 3 I�)uirgpauira IIII'
• Evaluate remedial technologies proposed in the SSA Report for suitability with RWQCB requirements • Evaluate additional technologies that may better address RWQCB requirements • Prepare and submit draft RAP to City for review
• Provide RAP to RWQCB for review
• Submit RAP for public review (see Task 4 below)
• Finalize RAP upon completion of public outreach activities i'a IIk 4, ...........� ° t itiiiraa °h
• Prepare Community Survey and Fact Sheet (in English and Spanish) • Develop '/4-mile radius (including residence, business, and key contacts) and deliver documents • Prepare response to comments
Based on Wood's experience working on similar project and the assumptions listed above, the total estimated cost to implement Tasks 1 through 4 is $66,905. Copies of Wood's hourly fee schedule and summary of cost estimate for Tasks 1 through 7 (individual tasks and total costs) are included on the following pages. Tasks 1 through 7 summarizing the total anticipated scope of work and assumptions for remediation consulting services to be provided by Wood for the entire ECRG is $829,907 and are provided on corresponding pages.

Exhibit 2 198

Summary of Scope of Work and Assumptions
Equitable Community Revitalization Grant (ECRG)
Former Berk Oil and Pacific Metal Craft Site
City of Bell Gardens
Bell Gardens, California
The anticipated scope of work and assumptions for Remediation Consulting Services to be Provided by Wood for the Equitable Community Revitalization Grant (ECRG) for the Former Berk Oil and Pacific Metal Craft Site in Bell Gardens, California, are summarized here. Estimated costs corresponding to these tasks are provided in Attachment 1.

Task 1a—Identify and Address Data Gaps
Scope
Similar to scope described in proposal dated 8/15/22 but expanded based on subsequent RWQCB requests and communications.

Assumptions
Responses to RWQCB letters and requests will be in a single combined work plan document.

One round of RWQCB review comments and responses will be necessary.

Task 1b—Implement Work Plan: Field and Laboratory
Scope
Implementation of RWQCB-approved work plan for combined soil, soil gas, and groundwater investigations.

Assumptions
Work will be conducted in parallel with preparation of the FS/RAP (Task 3a).

Includes: drilling, soil sampling, and groundwater grab sampling; installation and sampling of 6 to 10 multi-depth soil gas probes, construction, development, and sampling of up to 6 groundwater monitoring wells; laboratory analysis of soil, soil gas, and groundwater samples; destruction of up to 8 existing groundwater monitoring wells; and survey.

Wood will retain investigation subcontractors.

Task 1c—Implement Work Plan: Reporting
Scope
Preparation of a combined report for soil, soil gas, and groundwater investigations and well destructions.

Assumptions
Soil, soil gas, and groundwater investigations and well destructions can be reported in a single combined document.

One round of RWQCB review comments and responses will be necessary. 1 Exhibit 2 199

Findings and interpretations will be integrated into a supplement to the FS/RAP (Task 3b) if necessary.

Task 1d—Characterize Extent and Properties of Fill
Scope
Delineate lateral and vertical extent and assess chemical and geotechnical properties of existing fill Assumptions
Initial data will be collected in conjunction with Task 1b.

Additional data will be collected in conjunction with Task 7a after site clearing and removal of surficial debris.

One day of backhoe subcontractor retained by Wood for potholing and trenching.

Additional contractor services if needed for work performed in conjunction with Task 7a will be provided by a contractor retained by the City.

Task 2a—Site Visit
Scope
Initial site visit and discussions with RWQCB.

Assumptions
As described in proposal dated 8/15/22.

Task 2b—Continued Communications with RWQCB
Scope
Meetings, calls, and routine communications with RWQCB staff through June 2024.

Assumptions
Approximately 2 hours per week for Wood project manager or lead engineer.

Task 3a- Prepare a FS/RAP
Scope
Prepare a FS/RAP to identify and evaluate remedial alternatives for soil and soil gas.

Assumptions
As described in proposal dated 8/15/22
Evaluation of remedial alternatives can be streamlined with focus on presumptive remedies for soil (excavation and disposal) and soil gas(SVE).

One round of RWQCB review comments and responses will be necessary. 2 Exhibit 2 200

Task 3b- FS/RAP Supplement
Scope
A FS/RAP Supplement will be prepared to incorporate the results of Data Gap Investigations (Task 1c) and preliminary results of fill characterization (Task 1d, as available) and RWQCB input on vapor intrusion mitigation requirements.

Assumptions
The FS/RAP Supplement will not result in overall changes to the remediation approaches described in the FS/RAP (Task 3a) but will refine how and where the approaches will be implemented on the site.

One round of RWQCB review comments and responses will be necessary.

Task 4-Assist with Public Outreach
Scope
Provide assistance to public outreach efforts.

Assumptions
As described in proposal dated 8/15/22.

Public outreach, CEQA, and related work will be conducted by the RWQCB or a separate consultant retained by the City, with assistance from Wood.

Task 5- Prepare Design Documents and Assist with Contractor Procurement Scope
Prepare plans and specifications for site clearing and debris removal, excavation, transportation, and disposal of contaminated soil (Task 5a) and SVE system(s)or other VI mitigation measures (Task 5b) Assist City with contractor procurement(Task Sc). If SVE is selected as a remedy, design drawings may include:
• Site plan w/SVE wells and assumed ROI
• Trenching Plan View
• Trenching Profiles
• Civil Details
• Process Flow Diagram
• Piping and Instrumentation Diagram
• Treatment Equipment Layout
• Electrical Diagrams
Assumptions
Plans and specifications for site clearing, debris removal, and excavation, transportation, and disposal of contaminated soil are prepared as a single package.

Plans and specifications for SVE or other VI mitigation measures are prepared as a separate single package.

Assistance with procurement consists of answering bidder questions related to site conditions and remediation designs and providing input to the City on bids received, if requested. 3 Exhibit 2 201

Task 6- Obtain Permits and Approvals
Scope
Preparation of work plans for remedial excavation and SVE or other VI mitigation for RWQCB review and approval. Obtaining well permits for groundwater monitoring wells, soil gas probes, and SVE wells as necessary. Obtaining an air discharge permit for an SVE vapor treatment system.

Assumptions
Two separate work plans will be prepared and submitted to the RWQCB.

Both plans will describe sampling and analyses to be done for remedy performance monitoring or verification.

One round of RWQCB review comments and responses will be necessary for each work plan.

All other permits and approvals will be obtained by remediation contractors retained by the City,with minor support from Wood.

Task 7a—Excavation Observation and Reporting
Scope
Observation during site clearing and debris removal.

Additional data collection for characterization of fill (if needed following Task 1d).

Observation during excavation and on-site management of contaminated soil.

Verification sampling and laboratory analysis of soil samples from excavation perimeter.

Assumptions
Field work is conducted over four continuous weeks.

Wood retains laboratory contractor for analysis of verification samples.

Documentation of transport and disposal of contaminated soil and compliance with all permits to be provided by remediation contractor retained by the City.

Preparation of an excavation completion report.

Task 7b—SVE Construction Observation and Reporting
Scope
Observation during construction and startup of SVE system or other VI mitigation measure. Reporting is expected to include:
• Record drawings
• Construction completion report
• Air permit initial compliance
Assumptions
Field work for SVE construction and startup is conducted over five continuous weeks.

Documentation of compliance with all permits to be provided by contractor retained by the City.

Preparation of an SVE construction and startup report.
4 Exhibit 2 202

Task 7c—Plans for Required Future Work
Scope
May include plans for continued SVE operations, OM&M of other VI mitigation measures (such as sub slab depressurization systems), periodic site inspections, or soil management.

Assumptions
Plans or other documents to be required by RWQCB or others will be identified during the project. 5 Exhibit 2 203

RF&& O
� v
O �
r � �
a
rea o ... ... .............
p LL e Q Q e �
g .............
-88228
em e _ .....
$
ci
EB 2m ve e e o o�� o0000 000000
Ev v m o m o o 22. 00000 000000
F
51 so oom o00 0000000000000
6 e` a oo m oom o00 0000000000000
oo o mm oo o� ... ... ......
z w
`os o e
w� `
Qoz. Po 2 m ... ... o00 0000000000000
2 2 R 2 22222
--- 0 o0
�m
ci
p
o0000000000 000 0000000000000
9 3
000�o 000 00000 000000
2 . .».».
re ro o00 00 -64moo 0000
22 e oom ... 000000000000o O
N
..» - .» ».»2 Z»
x N
3 a w w
. .$
ooe ... ............0
5 O
2 _ C
a a
a q mm 9
12 r. C
'tea cq up 8., K
SSVo �o0 3 c333.c �
3 oN q2 6u D. 2. 3 ti N
_ 9
L
X
W

AwooPROPOSED RATES •
City of Bell Gardens Request for Proposal
Equitable Community Revitalization Grant
Former Berk Oil and Pacific Metal Craft Site
Effective through June 29, 2024
WOOD JOB TITLES PROPOSED CONTRACT RATES
Principal $ 240
Sr Associate $ 220
Associate $ 195
Senior 2 $ 175
Senior 1 $ 150
Eng/Sci Professional 3 $ 135
Eng/Sci Professional 2 $ 120
Eng/Sci Professional 1 $ 110
CADD/GIS $ 120
Technician 5 $ 125
Technician 4 $ 110
Technician 3 $ 95
Administrative Staff 5 $ 95
Administrative Staff 3 1 $ 85
Travel Expenses: IRS Standard Milage Rate (current$0.625/mile) Subcontract Expenses: Supplies or services furnished to Wood in support of project activities by any supplier or firm: Cost plus 8%
Direct Expenses: Other expenses in support of project activities: Cost plus 8% Exhibit 2 F:\i_MARKET\Proposals\23DTroposals\22PROPGOVT.0282\Final NATIVE files\rate schedule.xlsx

('0`1
. ,�C�➢�P1'. Proposal
Environmental Remediation Consultation for Former Berk Oil site u4r

5.0 Additions or Exceptions
As requested, this is a separate section of our submittal, immediately behind this document.

Exhibit 2 206

Exhibit 2 207

Proposal
Environmental Administrative Consultation for Former Berk Oil Site

5.0 Additions or Exceptions
Wood reviewed the sample contract the City provided and does not have any additions or exceptions at this time. However, it is unclear if selected subcontractors will provide services through Wood's agreement or would be contracted separately by the City. We can work with the City and the DTSC as the grant manager to address this question upon award of contract. In addition, we recognize the final contract may need to differ from the sample to reflect requirements of the ECRG.

Some key elements of the RFP that Wood considered in its response include:
• Our staff fee will remain in place through June 29, 2024 when the grant funding period ends • Wood understands the ECRG payment terms may be up to 90 days • •
wood.

Exhibit 2 208

wood.

Appendix A
Wood Resumes
Exhibit 2 209

Joseph Bande, PG
Principal Geologist wood.

Summary Professional Summary
Joseph Bande has 29 years of environmental site investigation eIllYs y, tatelll�llllellli °e and remediation experience. He has overseen and implemented 29 (20 with Wood) most aspects of hazardous waste site investigations and Office of remediation, including preparation of sampling and analysis plans (SAPS), Phase I and II environmental site assessments Costa Mesa, California (ESAs), removal action work plans (RAWs) and remedial action ww,, " till ° "°Illlllli plans (RAPS), hydrogeologic evaluations, health and safety oversight, data evaluation, risk assessment, agency negotiations, Bachelor of Science, Geology, soil and groundwater cleanup, public participation, vapor California State University, intrusion evaluation and mitigation, and preparation of closure Fullerton, 1993 documents. Joe has conducted and managed numerous soil, Associate of Art, Cypress College, soil gas, and groundwater remedial investigation (RI)/feasibility 1990 study (FS) projects at facilities throughout California ranging f e ' istIiira °ioiillnis from simple grab sample investigations for private companies to RCRA/CERCLA RIs and cleanup with budgets in excess of � elll�"°lilllill ° "°lillslllis Illl,lill °elllises $15 million.

Professional Geologist, CA, 7058, Joe's expertise includes the design and implementation of RIs 2000 and corrective measures for both private sector and Areas o Illlww,,�tll�telll�"�°Illlse government clients. His industry experience includes dry cleaner and plating facilities, manufacturing, petro- and agricultural- • Phase 1 / 11 ESAs chemical, financial, municipalities, Brownfield developments, • Due Diligence military sites, and aerospace facilities. In addition to managing ® Remedial Investigation numerous investigations involving petroleum hydrocarbons and/or solvents, Joe designed and implemented RI/FS projects • Soil, Soil Gas, and Groundwater characterizing chemicals such as pesticides, metals, depleted Remediation uranium, explosives, chemical warfare agents, and emerging ® Hydrogeologic Studies compounds. His experience with treatment technologies includes soil vapor extraction (SVE) using cryogenic-cooling and • Brownfield and Property compression technology and activated carbon adsorption, in Assessments situ treatment, soil excavation and removal, and • Vapor Intrusion Evaluation and screening/segregation of explosive/hazardous substances.

Mitigation These investigations and remedial activities were overseen by local, state, and federal regulatory agencies.
• Remedy Evaluation and
Implementation Experience
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... • Construction and Demolition DTSC Site Mitigation and Restoration Program On-Call Planning/Oversight Contract, Cypress Region, CA
® Munitions and Explosives of Responsible for managing the on-call services contract for Concern environmental site assessment and restoration services for the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DISC) Cypress, CA Region. The on-call contracts included Phase 1/11 ESAs, potential responsible party identification, site-wide facility screening and hazardous waste generation evaluations,
22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 210

Joseph Bande, PG
Principal Geologist wood.

SAP/workplan preparation, RI/FS investigations and studies, RAP and RAW preparation, California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) support and public outreach participation, United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) grant funded Targeted Site Investigation (TSI) projects, design/implementation of remedial actions, remediation systems operations and maintenance, and providing technical expertise for on-call tasks. Oversaw and managed 62 task orders totaling nearly $20 million in project work.

Berk Oil and Pacific Metal Craft Properties, Bell Gardens, CAProject Manager. Managed and oversaw three separate site investigation programs:
• 2012 TSI funded through DTSC grant program
2019 Site Characterization funded through DTSC Brownfield Assessment grant 2022 Supplemental Site Assessment (SSA) funded through U.S. EPA Brownfields grant awarded to National Development Council
Responsible for performing an RI during the 2012 and 2019 programs at this vacant and unproductive brownfields property. Prepared a Phase I ESA in 2012 summarizing previous site activities and identifying several Recognized Environmental Conditions at the site. Prepared subsequent work plans to characterize soil, soil-gas, and groundwater conditions at the site using innovative tools and techniques to expedite the site investigation. Oversaw use of high-resolution subsurface screening tools (cone penetration testing [CPT], Hydraulic Profiling Tool [HPT], Membrane Interface Probe [MIP]), along with confirmation soil, soil gas, and groundwater sampling (using grab methods) to assess how environmental conditions associated with current or former land uses affected commercial/industrial redevelopment plans. Lead and benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) were detected in soil at concentrations exceeding screening levels. Prepared the 2019 Site Characterization Report that provided recommendations for commercial/industrial reuse of the site on a parcel by parcel basis.

Managed the 2022 SSA with the goal of evaluating mix reuse of the site (commercial/industrial and residential development). Prepared plans to install passive soil gas probes to provide information on overall site volatile organic compounds (VOC), total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon conditions. Used results of the passive soil gas samples to direct confirmation sampling locations. Used active soil gas, CPT, membrane interface hydraulic profile tool direct-read monitoring, and grab groundwater samples it evaluate site conditions and support site redevelopment decisions. Assisted with preparation of a Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) to evaluate both commercial/industrial and residential (mixed) land use and calculate potential health risks posed by chemicals of potential concern at the site. Results of the HHRA demonstrated that exposure of future site occupants under both residential and commercial/industrial reuse scenarios to current soil and soil gas conditions would result in an elevated noncancer hazard and cancer risk. Therefore, a response action would be required to allow for mixed use site redevelopment.

Prepared the SSA Report, which identified the estimated areas of lead and/or BaP soil excavation that, when removed, would allow for unrestricted use of site soil. Recommended installation of vapor barriers beneath any new slab-on-grade building construction to address potential vapor intrusion concerns because soil gas concentrations were relatively low and dispersed throughout the site. All project work was completed within the grant funding's deliverable schedule and authorized budget. Results and recommendation from the SSA were used by the City to obtain an Equitable Community Revitalization Grant.
22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 211

Joseph Bande, PG
Principal Geologist wood.

Engineering Plating, Santa Ana, CA
Project Manager. Responsible for performing a RI and groundwater pilot studies and supporting implementation of an SVE and situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) pilot tests at a former plating facility. The project was funded through the State "Orphan Site" program because indoor air VOC concentrations presented a potential "Imminent and Substantial Endangerment"to site occupants and the current site owner did not have the resources to complete site investigation and implement remedial actions. To alleviate VOCs concentrations in indoor air, planned for and oversaw installation of two horizontal vapor extraction wells beneath the existing building foundation to provide subsurface depressurization (SSD) by connection to the SVE system, which used granular activated carbon (GAC) to treat extracted vapors.

Operation of the SSD resulted in lowering indoor air VOC concentrations by one to two orders of magnitude.

Used a combination of high-resolution subsurface screening tools (CPT, HPT, MIP), along with confirmation soil and groundwater sampling (using grab methods or installing and sampling groundwater monitoring wells) to identify and delineate a paleochannel underlying a portion of the site. VOC-impacted groundwater was moving along the higher-porosity paleochannel sands and gravels tangential to the regional groundwater flow direction in finer-grained sediments. Prepared a conceptual site model that accounted for the variable VOC mass movement along the paleochannel and in multiple undifferentiated water-bearing zones following the regional flow direction.

Prepared plans for bench-scale treatability studies to evaluate ISCO to remediate VOC-impacted groundwater. Using results of the bench-scale treatability studies, demonstrated that ISCO using sodium permanganate was appropriate for treatment of high VOC concentrations in groundwater. Subsequently prepared an FS/RAP using results of the RI and pilot studies to design and support long-term soil and groundwater remedial efforts. Recommended SVE for VOC-impacted soil and ISCO for VOC-impacted groundwater. Assisted DTSC with preparation of a Public Participation Plan, Fact Sheet, community notices, and other documents to support CEQA public outreach requirements. Subsequently supported DTSCs public outreach efforts, participated in a community workshop and a public meeting, and reviewed proposed responses to public comments. DTSC approved the FS/RAP following completion of CEQA public review activities.

Prepared plans for an ISCO pilot study, which included an application for a Waste Discharge Requirement (WDR) permit under the SA-RWQCB's Discharge Authorization and Monitoring & Reporting Program to inject up to 7 percent sodium permanganate by weight. The pilot test was implemented in two phases, the first to evaluate VOC-impacted groundwater within the paleochannel deposits and the second to evaluate VOC-impacted groundwater within the undifferentiated water-bearing sediments outside the paleochannel. Oversaw ISCO activities and provided additional safety precautions because of a nearby homeless encampment. Subsequently prepared a final ISCO pilot test summary report. The project work was completed according to plan and within authorized budget and schedules.

Pathway High School, Lynwood, CA
Project Manager. Responsible for performing a Supplemental Site Investigation (SSI) and implementing soil removal actions allowing for redevelopment with modular buildings for housing student and faculty personnel on an unused portion of the Lynwood Unified School District (LUSD) property. The LUSD entered into a School Cleanup Agreement with DTSC to provide oversight of the SSI and removal actions allowing for unrestricted land reuse and to comply with public outreach requirements pursuant to CEQA.

Historical operation of a warehouse at the site resulted in organochlorine pesticide impact to soil from termiticide application (e.g., dieldrin) and lead impact to soil from lead-based paint.

Prepared an SSI Work Plan to define the extent of lead- and dieldrin-impacted soil and address other potential site contaminants originating from historical operation of an underground storage tank/gasoline dispenser and reported use of small parts cleaning wash basins inside the former building. Used results of the field sampling program to prepare the SSI Report, which documented lead and dieldrin were the only 22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 212

Joseph Bande, PG
Principal Geologist wood.
site contaminants of concern (COCs), defined the vertical and lateral extent of soils impact, and determined COC cleanup goals. Upon DTSC's approval of the SSI Report, assisted them with preparation of the draft Removal Action Workplan (RAW) that recommended excavation of lead and dieldrin impacted soil followed by off-site transportation to an approved facility for treatment/disposal.

After DTSC approved the draft RAW and submitted it for public review, assisted them with implementing CEQA activities, which included preparation of a Community Profile, Community Survey, and Community Updates.After completion of public outreach efforts, finalized the RAW pursuant to DTSC request and assisted the LUSD with contractor selection (prepared Technical Specifications and Procurement and Agreement Requirements to support competitive bid contract requirements). In 2018, provided oversight during removal of 231.47 tons of impacted soil and collected confirmation soil samples demonstrating achieved the project remedial action objectives. Subsequently, prepared the Removal Action Completion Report (RACK) supporting No Further Action determination for the site. DTSC agreed with our recommendation and approved the RACK in February 2018 as is and with no comments.

The classroom buildings were installed in 2019 and the Panthers Pathway program will be open to new students soon. Wood completed the SSI, RAW, and RACK on schedule. Our original total estimated cost for site investigation, planning, and closure was approximately $175,000. However, through planning collaborative efforts between the client and DTSC representatives, our final invoice cost was $122,167 saving over $50,000 from our original overall projected project costs.

Former Bethune Library, Los Angeles, CA
Project Manager. Responsible for performing a site investigation and preparing a RAW to support redevelopment planning for the former Bethune Library site. The approximate 0.77-acre vacant site located adjacent to the University of Southern California campus is in a highly desirable location for development. Prepared plans to evaluate potential VOCs, TPH, metals, acid, and semi-VOC impacts.

Results from the soil and soil gas samples demonstrated that removal of lead-impacted soil was necessary to allow for unrestricted reuse of the site property.

Assisted in preparation of a RAW to evaluate removal action alternatives and costs. Estimated 4,945 cubic yards of lead-impacted soil would need to be removed from the site to allow for unrestricted reuse. The RAW described responsibilities of the selected contractor to designate a Certified Lead Supervisor pursuant to California Department of Public Health requirements. Reviewed and finalized other components of the RAW including:
• Quality Assurance and Quality Control Plan
• Decontamination Plan
• Dust Control and Monitoring Plan
All project work was completed within the grant funding's deliverable schedule and authorized budget.

The property owner is using the agency-approved RAW to support redevelopment planning. 22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 213

Charles lc r , PE wood
Principal Scientist - Remedial •
Summary Professional Summary
Charles has more than 31 years of experience in active
eIIIY y, tatelll�llllellli °e remediation and extensive experience managing the design, 31 (6 with Wood) installation, operation, and optimization of treatment Office equipment for oil and gas, industrial, and petrochemical clients.

His experience includes pilot testing, system design, equipment Oakland, California procurement, construction oversight, system optimization and ww,, " till ° "°Illlllli project closeout on a wide variety of projects.

Bachelor of Science, Chemical, Charles has expertise working with water treatment equipment, Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie including the following treatment processes: filtration, oil/water Mellon University, New York, 1990 separation, aeration, activated carbon, ozone/peroxide and UV/peroxide advanced oxidation reactors, and ion exchange f e ')iustiiratiuoiins / resins.

Ceuir"ti i °ati yin / iceiiinises Experience
Professional Engineer, Chemical, CA Refinery Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) System Design, 6175, 2004 Alon, Bakersfield, CA
Professional Engineer, Civil, CA Project Manager. Managed the design of a 15,000 cubic foot 78927, 2011 per minute SVE system at a refinery. This system was one of the Areas Illl,El Illpeliirtise largest SVE systems ever designed, which utilized three blowers ® Chemical Engineer each equipped with a variable frequency drive to allow maximum flexibility and power consumption optimization. • Environmental Engineer Recovered vapors were treated by a regenerative thermal • Industrial Engineer oxidizer for maximum energy efficiency prior to discharge to the atmosphere.
• Chemist
• Civil Engineer Product Recovery System Upgrade— Refinery, Hovensa, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands
Senior Project Engineer. Provided the technical design for the upgrade of a free-phase hydrocarbon containment and
recovery system comprised of 100 wells. The Environmental Protection Agency's mandated system operational requirements were met for the first time in five years after the completion of the upgrades. In addition to groundwater pumping wells, the site also operated three thermal oxidizers that processed vapors from multi-phase extraction systems. Modifications to the thermal soil vapor oxidizers, implemented as part of the same upgrade, resulted in a supplemental fuel usage savings of more than $250,000 per year.
22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 214

Charles lc r , PE wood
Principal Scientist - Remedial •
Integrity Management Support, British Petroleum, Multiple Sites Integrity Management Coordinator. Worked as British Petroleum's integrity management coordinator for US retail, pipeline, terminal, and mining operations. Responsibilities include reviewing all new remediation system designs and construction, providing final review for any modifications to existing systems, and supervising system-related incident investigations for active remediation sites. Initiatives have included assisting with the implementation of a database for tracking inspection, operation, and maintenance activities, and educating consultants on the proper method for identifying, inspecting and maintaining protective safety devices on active remediation systems.

Pipeline Release Remediation, Kinder Morgan, Corpus Christi, TX Senior Process Engineer. Provided process engineering design support for the remediation of a large pipeline spill. An estimated one million gallons of technical grade benzene were released, which overlay hexavalent chromium impacted groundwater. The site is being remediated through the use of SVE and multiphase extraction. The vapor treatment system includes a thermal oxidizer and a prototype benzene recovery system. The benzene recovery system removes benzene from the vapor stream by freezing it on two parallel heat exchangers. The recovered liquid benzene is sold to a local refinery.Work at the site has included upgrading the existing SVE system through the addition of to increase the hydrocarbon recovery rate and the installation of an air-to-glycol heat recovery system on the thermal oxidizer off-gas to improve air stripper efficiency.

Remediation at Former Refinery, Pennzoil, Emlenton, PA
Project Engineer. Designed a system for the recovery and treatment of hydrocarbon impacted groundwater at a former refinery.The recovered groundwater contained 20 mg/liter of dissolved iron. This was reduced to four mg/liter through the use of a sparge tank and a porous settling media. The reduction in iron concentration was required to reduce operation and maintenance costs and prevent fouling of the effluent line. The sparge tank was used to precipitate the iron through oxidation and pH increase. This eliminated the need for chemical pH adjustment thereby reducing the system complexity and the need to handle hazardous chemicals.

Terminal Closure, Shell Oil Products, Manila, Philippines Senior Engineer. Assisted with the site conceptual model development and cost estimating for a former bulk storage terminal in operation for approximately 100 years and was responsible for the selection of the proposed remedial technology.

Perchlorate Treatment System, Olin Corporation, Morgan Hill, CA Senior Engineer. Provided system design, procurement, and installation oversight for a hydraulic control system for a large perchlorate plume. Water was treated by filtration and ion exchange prior to discharge to storm sewer. Assisted with the equipment procurement specifications and vendor selection. After equipment vendor selection, worked directly with the vendor to verify that the process controls were properly interlocked with the groundwater recovery system. The equipment was transported to the site as skid mounted equipment to minimize the system installation and commissioning cost. The system was demonstrated to reliably recover and treat groundwater and continues in operation to this day, 22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 215

Calvin r castle, PE wood.

Principal Environmental Engineer
Summary Professional Summary
Calvin Hardcastle has more than 41 years of process and eIllYs y, tatelll�llllellli °e environmental engineering experience. He has worked in 41 (27 with Wood) environmental consulting for the past 35 years. His expertise Office of includes investigation and remediation of contaminated soil vapor, soil, and groundwater as well as developing site closure Costa Mesa, California strategies. Calvin has also conducted potable water supply ww,, " till ° "°Illlllli projects including feasibility studies, pilot testing, design, maintenance, and rehabilitation of treatment facilities and Master of Science, Civil pipelines.

Engineering, University of Arizona,
Tucson, 1987 Experience
Bachelor of Science, Metallurgical RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI) and Corrective Engineering, University of Arizona, Measures Implementation, Inglewood, CA Tucson, 1981
Engineering Manager. Performed, managed, and directed a f e ')istIiira °ioiillnis variety of project phases to investigation and remediate the Celllr°tIIII IIII °atIlllolins IIII,icellllnises presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), primarily Professional Engineer, CA, C44751, tetrachloroethene (PCE), trichloroethene (TCE), and 1,1- 1989 dichloroethene (1,1-DCE), in soil, soil vapor, and groundwater.

Responsible for performing an interim remedial measure to Professional Engineer- Sanitary remove 26 underground storage tanks (USTs) and close in-place Engineer, AZ, 26935, 1993 two USTs in a staged manner to minimize impact to site Class A HAZ Contractors License operations. Conducted a design/build for implementation an interim measure using soil vapor extraction (SVE) to reduce VOC Areas o Illlww,,�tll�telll�"�°Illlse mass in soil and soil vapor. The SVE system consists of a • Soil and Groundwater network of 56 wells co-located in nest well pairings to screen Investigations four different soil zones, a duo manifold system to allow vapor • Process and Remediation extraction from soil zones with varying vacuum responses, and a Engineering C3 vapor abatement system to condense VOCs into liquid for management of by-products. The SVE system also acts as a sub- • Site Closure slab depressurization system to reduce potential risks to site • Litigation Support workers via indoor air intrusion of VOCs. Technical reviewer of pilot study to evaluate feasibility of implementing in situ bioremediation in shallow zone groundwater. Pilot study features a "push-pull" system to inject quick-release and slow- release carbon substrates and a bacteria consortium to
augment naturally-occurring groundwater conditions to
promote degradation of the chlorinated solvents. Technical director for the corrective measures study (CMS) to select remedial alternatives for site soil, soil vapor, and groundwater.

The CMS focuses on a strategy of in situ treatment of shallow groundwater and soil vapor extraction for soil and soil vapor. 22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 216

Calvin r castle, PE wood.

Principal Environmental Engineer
Superfund Site Investigation and Remediation, South Gate, CA Principal-in-Charge. Responsible for the overall technical review of the project, implementation of the remedial design, and negotiations to stay a portion of the Record of Decision (ROD) for remediation of a former drum reconditioning facility. A USEPA Region IX contractor developed the remedial design for mitigating the presence of VOCs in soil, soil vapor, and groundwater and 1,4-dioxane in groundwater. To mitigate shallow impacts, a high-vacuum extraction system was designed and constructed to extract soil vapor and shallow groundwater. Soil vapor was treated using a C3 cryogenic-compression-condensation system provided by GEO, Inc. prior to receiving polishing treatment and emission to the atmosphere.

Groundwater was separated from the extracted vapor and treated using an ozone-hydrogen peroxide advanced oxidation system. Treated groundwater was then discharged in conformance with a permit issued by the County of Los Angeles Sanitation Districts (LACSD). The remediation strategy for the deeper groundwater now varies from the ROD approach of using in situ chemical oxidation at a targeted on-site area, groundwater extraction in a non-focused, offsite area, and construction of an offsite in situ bio- barrier underlying a nearby residential area. As a key member of the technical team, a stay or possible elimination of the in situ chemical oxidation system was negotiated with USEPA on the basis that previous pilot testing did not demonstrate effectiveness of the technology at the site and that the bio-barrier was not needed. Instead, the current deeper groundwater remediation strategy consists of targeted on-site and off-site groundwater extraction to contain and mitigate concentration hot-spots and to reduce overall extraction rates. The proposed program is expected to decrease remediation times by 10 to 15 years at a VOC-Affected Soil and Groundwater Remediation
Project Manager. Responsible for preparing plans, specifications, construction, and operation of two 300 scfm, high vacuum soil vapor extraction (SVE) systems. The high vacuum systems were used to dewater the shallow groundwater zone and then extract soil vapor containing chlorinated solvents. Extracted groundwater and soil vapor were treated using GAC. In conjunction with this project, a pilot study was conducted to evaluate injection of Fenton's Reagent into the vadose and saturated zones was conducted as to assess the feasibility of implementing this remedial option. While some VOC removal was experienced, the level of removal was not sufficient to warrant further application at this site. Finally, as a final polishing step in the site remediation, in situ biological treatment of the residual VOC mass was stimulated using a proprietary substrate solution with the objective of catalyzing the reductive dechlorination of PCE and TCE.

Wholesale Facility and Fueling Station, Santa Clara, CA Responsible for overseeing implementation of remedial measures consisting of biologically active GAC units for treatment of MTBE and TBA in groundwater at a gasoline retail station. His activities included developing and review of design and startup of the treatment system.

Farm Fueling Facility, Ventura County, CA
Responsible for overseeing implementation of remediation measures consisting of high vacuum extraction to remove gasoline constituents and MTBE for soil and groundwater at a farm. Activities included implementing remediation system operations consisting of dual-phase extraction, groundwater extraction and treatment, and bioventing, developing groundwater characterization work plans, and negotiations on behalf of the client with the Ventura County Environmental Health Division. The monitoring record and residual soil vapor data were used to demonstrate that the residual VOCs constituted a low risk to human health and groundwater quality. Case closure was granted by Ventura County.
22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 217

Craig Stewart, PG, CHG, CEG wood.

Principal Hydrogeologist
Summary Professional Summary
........................................................................................................................................................................

Craig Stewart has more than 40 years of professional experience eIllYs ww,, tatelll�llllellli °e investigating and remediating contaminated soil and 40 (31 with Wood) groundwater. He has conducted soil and groundwater Office of characterizations, remedial investigations, remedial action planning, and remediation of sites where soils and groundwater Costa Mesa, California were contaminated by fuel hydrocarbons, solvents, metals, ww,, " till ° "°Illlllli oilfield wastes, or pesticides. He has worked on investigations, cleanups, and closures of industrial facilities to support Master of Arts, Geology, University Brownfields redevelopment projects. Craig has conducted and of Missouri, Columbia, 1982 managed large basin-scale groundwater quality projects as well Bachelor of Science, Independent as numerous projects involving investigation, monitoring, or Program of Studies - Geologic closure of landfills and other waste management or disposal Engineering, Harvey Mudd College, facilities. He has conducted due diligence site assessments for 1980 industrial, commercial, agricultural, and undeveloped properties. f e' istIiiratioiiIPIs He has experience working with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Department of � elll�"'IIIIIIII ° "°Illlslllis IIII,IIII °elllises Toxic Substances Control (DISC), Regional Water Quality Certified Hydrogeologist, CA, Control Board (RWQCB), and other state and local regulatory HG106, 1995 staff on projects that entail complex technical and policy issues, Certified Engineering Geologist, CA, and has provided expert consultant services and trial testimony EG1277, 1986 in regard to the nature, extent, and cause of soil and Professional Geologist, CA, groundwater contamination and the costs of soil and GE04087, 1986 groundwater remediation.

AreasExperience
III
• Site Assessment and Site Investigation/Remediation Planning, Plating Remediation Facility, Stanton, CA
Principal-In-Charge. Project involved site characterization, • Hydrogeology regulatory interaction, and remediation planning for an active • Groundwater Resources plating facility where soil and groundwater had been affected ® Engineering Geology by chromium (VI) Oxide Cr(VI) and chlorinated solvents. Early stages of work involved assisting the client and counsel in negotiating a Consent Agreement with DISC.Technical work included development of a Current Conditions Report and preparation and implementation of a Facility Investigation (FI) Work Plan.The FI was conducted using a phased approach to optimize data evaluation and decision-making as the work progressed. Results of the FI were compiled and presented in a FI Report and incorporated into a Human Health Risk
Assessment (HHRA) that considered current and potential future use of the site.The project also involved evaluation of corrective measure alternatives and identification of a preferred alternative to address impacts of Cr(VI) in soil and groundwater to protect 22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 218

Craig Stewart, PG, CHG, CEG wood.

Principal Hydrogeologist
human health and the environment.

Engineering Plating, DTSC, Santa Ana, CA
Project Director. Project involved designing and conducting a remedial investigation, a pilot test for in-situ treatment of groundwater and a pilot test for soil remediation using soil vapor extraction. The project, which was conducted at a former plating facility, was funded through State of California "Orphan Site" project fees because indoor air volatile organic compound (VOC) concentrations presented a potential "Imminent and Substantial Endangerment"to site occupants, and the current site owner did not have the resources to complete site investigation and implement remedial actions (RAs).To alleviate VOCs concentrations in indoor air, two horizontal extraction wells were installed beneath the building foundation to provide subsurface depressurization (SSD) by connection to an SVE system, which uses granular activated carbon (GAC) to treat extracted vapors. Operation of the SSD resulted in lowering indoor air VOC concentrations by one to two orders of magnitude. Using results of bench-scale treatability studies, demonstrated that ISCO using sodium permanganate was appropriate for treatment of high VOC concentrations in groundwater.A feasibility study and remedial action plan (FS/RAP) was prepared using results of the Remedial Investigation (RI) and pilot studies to design and support long- term soil and groundwater remedial efforts.The FS/RAP recommended SVE for VOC-impacted soil and ISCO for VOC-impacted groundwater. Following DTSC approval of the FS/RAP, supplemental investigations and a field-scale pilot study were conducted to provide data for use in design of an In Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO) remedy for groundwater. The ISCO pilot study was conducted in accordance with Waste Discharge Requirements issued by the RWQCB.The results of the supplemental investigations and ISCO pilot study were compiled and submitted in a comprehensive report to support design of a full- scale remedy for groundwater.

Berk Oil and PMC Properties, City of Bell Gardens, CA
Project Director and Technical Review. Project work has included three significant phases of site characterization and redevelopment planning since 2012. The first two phases of work were conducted in 2012 and 2019 on behalf of the City through grants awarded by DTSC. The third phase of work included a Supplemental Site Assessment (SSA) and HHRA using grant funding provided by the EPA and administered by the National Development Council.

For the 2012 and 2019 phases, work plans were prepared and implemented to characterize soil, soil-gas, and groundwater conditions at the site using innovative tools and techniques.The results of the site characterization were used to assess how site environmental conditions might affect plans for future redevelopment of the site for commercial use. Shallow soils in some portions of the site were found to contain elevated concentrations of lead and/or the semi-volatile organic compound benzo(a)pyrene.The 2019 Site Characterization Report provided recommendations for commercial/industrial reuse on a parcel by parcel basis.

The 2022 SSA and HHRA were conducted to evaluate mixed use redevelopment of the site, including residential development. Soil, soil-gas, and groundwater conditions were evaluated using the innovative tools and techniques applied successfully in 2019. Results of the passive and active soil gas sampling, cone penetration testing, membrane interface hydraulic profile tool direct-read monitoring, and grab groundwater sampling showed relatively low levels of VOC and total petroleum hydrocarbon impacts.To support site redevelopment decisions, the HHRA evaluated both commercial/industrial and residential (mixed) land use and calculated potential health risks posed by chemicals of potential concern at the site.

Results of the HHRA indicated that localized cleanup of shallow soils and more widespread mitigation of 22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 219

Craig Stewart, PG, CHG, CEG wood.

Principal Hydrogeologist
potential vapor intrusion from soil gas to indoor air would be required to allow for mixed use site redevelopment.

Remedial Action Work Plan for Site Redevelopment, New Economics for Women, Los Angeles, CA
Project Director and Technical Advisor. This project involved development of a remediation approach and preparation of a remedial action work plan (RAW) on behalf of New Economics for Women, a non-profit organization, to support construction of a five-story building that would house a primary healthcare clinic on the lower two floors and affordable housing on the upper floors. To support redevelopment plans, soil remediation is necessary, and the building materials will require proper abatement of hazardous materials before any building renovation or demolition activities occur.The RAW was prepared pursuant to DTSC guidelines and described onsite contamination, removal action goals, details of the preferred and recommended removal actions and necessary guidance (e.g., health and safety plan, quality assurance plan, decontamination plan, dust monitoring and mitigation plan, soil management plan, transportation plan), and implementation cost and schedule.The RAW described appropriate lead-based paint and asbestos-containing materials abatement, excavation and soil management procedures (including hazardous waste controls and air monitoring measures, and installation of a vapor barrier and depressurization system). DTSC approved the RAW, which was completed within the project schedule and authorized budget.

Kenneth Hahn State Recreational Area, Baldwin Hills, CA Technical Advisor. Provided technical review for site investigation and risk management activities related to the redevelopment of a portion of the Inglewood Oil Field into a recreational soccer field complex as part of the Kenneth Hahn State Recreational Area. Project activities included reviewing previous environmental investigation reports and regulatory agency correspondence, performing field activities that included soil gas and soil sampling and analysis, and performing a human health risk evaluation.

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facility Investigation and Corrective Measures Implementation, Inglewood, CA
Technical Advisor. Work at the site is being conducted under a DTSC Consent Agreement. Soil vapor investigations, groundwater monitoring, and dense non-aqueous phase liquid measurement and removals have been conducted. Perch loroethylene and trichloroethylene and their degradation products are the primary VOCs in the subsurface at this site. An off-site shallow soil vapor survey was conducted to assess potential indoor air impacts related to soil vapor intrusion to nearby residential properties, which was found to not be an issue. Groundwater investigations and monitoring were conducted to evaluate the presence and extent of VOCs in the upper two water-bearing zones and a microcosm bench-scale study was performed to assess the potential for in situ bioremediation of VOC impacted groundwater.

Subsequent phases of work included operating an on-site SVE interim measure using GEO's proprietary "C3"technology, hydraulic testing, long-term monitoring of groundwater, and conducting an in situ bioremediation pilot study for impacted groundwater under a site-specific Waste Discharge Permit issued by the RWQCB.A Corrective Measures Study (CMS) was prepared to support selection of methods for remediation of soil and groundwater impacts related to chlorinated solvents. Groundwater modeling was used to support the alternatives analysis for the groundwater remedies. The CMS was approved by DTSC and a Corrective Measures Implementation Workplan is currently being developed. 22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 220

Shiow-Whei Chou, PE wood
Senior Associate Environmental Engineer •
Summary Professional Summary
Ms. Shiow-Whei Chou has more than 23 years of experience in elllr y, tatelll�llllellli °e environmental engineering and consulting. Her expertise 23 (23 with Wood) includes hazardous waste site investigation and remediation; Office design, construction, and implementation of innovative remediation technologies; and project management. She has Costa Mesa, California managed or served as a technical lead for projects involving site ww,, " till ° "°Illlllli assessments; feasibility and pilot studies; design, construction, and implementation of various remedial measures; operations, Master Science - Civil maintenance, and monitoring (OM&M) of soil and groundwater Engineering, Civil Engineering, remediation systems; system optimization; regulatory University of California, Irvine, 2007 compliance and permitting; and site closures. She has extensive Bachelor of Science, Environmental experience working with the California Regional Water Quality Engineering, University of Control Boards (RWQCBs), United States Environmental California, Irvine, 1999 Protection Agency Region IX, the California Department of Toxic Bachelor of Science, Biological Substances Control (DTSC), and other regulatory agencies in Sciences, University of California, California. Shiow-Whei is an experienced project manager with Irvine, 1999 strong skills in client management, regulatory agency and elllltlllrllll
i lll t public interaction, project controls, and technical review and i delivery.

Celllr"tlill lilt °atlillr lin / icelllrmi e
Experience
Professional Eng
ineer, Civil, CA .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... 66044, 2004 Confidential Superfund Site, Southern California Project Manager. Responsible for scoping, budgeting, and client Areas ofIlllww,, tlltelllr"°Illlte and regulatory interactions at a former drum reconditioning • Remedial Design facility.The project involved design and implementation of soil • Remedial Implementation and groundwater remedies including a dual-phase extraction system and a groundwater extraction and aboveground
• Site Investigation/Remediation advanced oxidation treatment system to remediate soil and • Project and Construction groundwater impacted with chlorinated volatile organic Management compounds (VOCs) and 1,4-dioxane. Pre-construction tasks included site investigations, pilot testing, preparation of remedial planning documents, design drawings and
specifications, bidding, permitting and identification of substantive requirements. Construction management tasks included construction oversight, hazardous waste management, regulatory reporting, and schedule and cost control. Operation and maintenance (O&M) of the soil and groundwater
remediation systems included preparation of the O&M manual, regulatory compliance, system optimization, performance monitoring, and reporting.
22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 221

Shiow-Whei Chou, PE wood
Senior Associate Environmental Engineer •
Confidential Remediation Project, Beaumont, CA
Project Manager. Managed the permitting, design, and construction of three remedial measures in a remote and biologically sensitive area: soil excavation and ex situ biotreatment for perchlorate; soil excavation and offsite disposal for metals; and construction of a biobarrier to remediate perchlorate in groundwater. The project also included design and implementation of an in situ chemical oxidation pilot test as a contingency measure for 1,4 dioxane in groundwater. As part of the design phase, reviewed the conceptual site model (CSM) focusing on the hydrogeology and fate and transport of perchlorate in groundwater. Based on this review, an additional assessment was conducted to verify the CSM and the conceptual design for the biobarrier. The additional assessment consisted of a seismic refraction survey to assess the approximate depths to bedrock and drilling of boreholes for lithologic assessment, potentiometric data, and collection of discrete-depth groundwater samples for perchlorate analysis. The assessment results supported the CSM, supplemented the basis for the biobarrier and monitoring well network design, and supported the elimination of deeper groundwater monitoring wells.

Also worked with the Santa Ana RWQCB to obtain Waste Discharge Requirements for both the biobarrier system and the ISCO pilot test. OM&M of the biobarrier is ongoing. The project was later expanded to include OM&M of an advanced oxidation process system for remediation of 1,4-dioxane in groundwater at a companion site and groundwater monitoring and reporting for more than 300 wells at both sites.

Responsibilities have included client, regulatory, and stakeholder interactions; management of the design, permitting, construction, and OM&M of the remedial measures; management of health and safety and quality control; and schedule and cost control.

Davis Chemical, DTSC, Los Angeles, CA
Project Manager. Managed an extended SVE pilot test to address chlorinated VOCs in soil. Optimized the SVE system operation and conducted a rebound test following system shutdown to verify remediation progress. Led the data analysis and submittal of a site closure report and received DTSC concurrence with our recommendations for no further action.

Site Assessment and Remediation, Fuel Pipeline, Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines Partners, L.P., Norwalk, CA
Project Manager. Implemented remedial measures for removal of free product and treatment of petroleum hydrocarbon constituents in soil and groundwater at a decommissioned military facility that has been impacted with gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel. Also developed and implemented strategies and work plans for additional site assessments and remediation system optimization. Remedial measures for this site consisted of free-product recovery, groundwater extraction, soil vapor extraction, and phytoremediation. Responsibilities included project management, O&M, performance monitoring, regulatory compliance monitoring, reporting, communicating with client and regulatory agency personnel, and presenting status reports and information at quarterly public meetings. 22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 222

Daney Saylor, PE, PH wood.

Senior Associate Civil Engineer
Summary Professional Summary
Daney Saylor has more than 22 years of experience in civil and elllrs y, tatelll�llllellli °e environmental engineering and consulting. His expertise 22 (21 with Wood) includes water resources engineering, hydrology and drainage Office of engineering, and soil and groundwater remediation. His project experience includes plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) Costa Mesa, California preparation, hydrologic modeling and hydraulic analysis, ww,, " till ° "°Illlllli drainage design, stormwater management, soil and groundwater remediation system design, operation and
Master Science, Civil maintenance of treatment systems, engineering feasibility Engineering, University of Kentucky, studies (FSs) preparation, and construction cost estimates.

Lexington, 2001
Daney has engaged in numerous design projects ranging from Bachelor of Science, Civil drafting conceptual designs for FSs to completion of detailed Engineering, University of Kentucky, PS&E documents for both private and public clients. He has Lexington, 1999 participated in design projects in various roles and has served as Master of Fine Arts, Photography the engineer-of-record on projects. Daney's designs have and Media, California Institute for encompassed water supply, pipelines, drainage infrastructure the Arts, 2012 and Best Management Practices, wastewater treatment, and I
�Re ' IIIIGtI general site civil engineering.
llr�"�°IIIIIIIr�IG
Celllr°tIIII IIII °atIlll lies IIII,icellllnises Daney's areas of expertise include hydrology, drainage, and stormwater management. He has participated in numerous
Professional Engineer, Civil, CA projects in California and Washington involving hydrologic and 65050, 2003 hydraulic analysis of existing sites, numerical modeling of Professional Hydrologist, hydrology and hydraulics, and planning and design of 15-H-7011, 2012 conveyance, treatment, and attenuation systems.

Areas ofIlll�w��w, �111eulr°��liuse Experience
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... • Civil Engineering Remediation System Construction, Confidential Client, • Environmental Engineering Vernon, CA
• Soil and Groundwater Engineer-of-Record. The remedial action for this Remediation 25-acre, former aluminum manufacturing site, impacted with chlorinated and Stoddard solvents, included soil vapor
• Hydrology extraction (SVE) and bioventing to address soil contamination. • Water Resources Engineering The site was redeveloped into two properties for industrial use requiring the design of two SVE systems using the existing 58 • Hydraulic Engineering SVE wells. After review of the developer plans, design plans were prepared that routed the SVE pipelines and appurtenances around the proposed buildings, utilities, and improvements.

Worked with the developer's engineers and architect to plan for the various designs to consider and resolve potential conflicts.

Prepared cost estimates and completed the plan check process. 22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 223

Daney Saylor, PE, PH wood.

Senior Associate Civil Engineer
Confidential Remediation Project, Beaumont, CA
Engineer-of-Record. Prepared design plans, calculations, and specifications for the remedial action for a southern California site. The design for the remedial action addressed perchlorate and metal-impacted soil and perch lorate-i m pacted groundwater. The remedial action for soil utilized ex situ biotreatment for perchlorate-impacted soil and excavation and off-site disposal for metals-impacted soil. The remedial action for groundwater consisted of the design of a passive, biobarrier trench that intercepted and treated shallow groundwater. The design process included successive submittals, each building on the previous iteration by addressing both the client's technical consultant and oversight agency reviews, comments, and observations. Provided engineering support throughout construction of the remedial action.

Confidential Superfund Site, Southern California
Senior Engineer. Prepared construction plans and cost estimates for a groundwater extraction (GWE) system for an industrial Superfund site. The design of the GWE system included extraction wells located on multiple private properties requiring a conveyance pipeline located in the public right-of-way. The design required discussions with and approval from private property owners and the City of South Gate in the development of easements for the system. Directed initial implementation of the Los Angeles County Sanitation District wastewater permit for treated effluent disposal, which included flow meter calibration, discharge testing, and permit reporting. Provided support for troubleshooting and optimizing operations of the dual phase extraction and GWE system.

Water Supply Well Facilities Design, Glendale Water & Power, Glendale, CA Senior Engineer. Prepared PS&Es for: a 3500-foot-long, 8-inch-diameter ductile iron pipeline; a 250 gpm production well; pump facilities; sodium hypochlorite disinfection system; and site improvements (site grading, retaining walls, paving, disinfection system building, drainage infrastructure, and fencing).

Coordinated and oversaw production of control system and electrical plans. The pipeline was located in the public right-of-way under Foothill Boulevard and terminated at the connection to the sub-surface concrete reservoir at New York Avenue Park. Provided support during construction by reviewing submittals and replying to requests for information and changes. Assisted the City with well permitting and interactions with the California Department of Public Health.

Plans and Specifications for Extraction Wells and Pipeline, Confidential Client, North Hollywood, CA
Engineer-of-Record. The goal of this superfund project was to remediate the groundwater aquifer impacted by chlorinated solvents. The project involved interactions with various stake holders and the Environmental Protection Agency.The scope of work included the production of design documents to progress the design of the remedial action. Led the production of design plans and specifications for a 12,000-foot-long, 14-inch-diameter pipeline and extraction well facility in an urban residential and commercial area. Four extraction wells were designed to produce an overall 2050 gallons per minute of flow to be conveyed to the existing treatment plant. Prepared design reports, schedules, cost estimates, and an operations, maintenance, and monitoring plan. Oversaw the production of a waste disposal plan, permit applications, storm water pollution prevention plan, geotechnical investigation, and utility potholing. The project required multiple field reconnaissance to identify potential extraction well sites in a fully developed neighborhood. Design was an iterative process that considered comments from both the client's technical consultant and regulator.
22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 224

Susan Rebellion,
Senior Engineer - Environmental •
Summary Professional Summary
Susan is an environmental professional with experience in eIllYs y, tatelll�llllellli °e environmental remediation, environmental compliance, and civil 11 (5 with Wood) engineering. Her focus at Wood includes providing support for Office of design, cost estimation, and operations, monitoring, and maintenance work related to groundwater, soil, and soil vapor Oakland, California treatment and containment systems. This includes treatment ww,, " till ° "°Illlllli system scoping and design, ensuring compliance with various environmental permit and other regulatory requirements, and Master Science, performing spatial and temporal data analysis to evaluate Civil/Environmental Engineering, contaminant distribution.

Fluid Mechanics/Hydrology,
Stanford University,Mechanics/Hydrology,
She also has specialized expertise in the investigation and cleanup of contaminated sites and a history of advising clients Bachelor of Science, Earth Systems; on environmental compliance, liability, and cost recovery Biology (minor), Stanford matters. Susan is highly knowledgeable of federal, state, and University, 2010 local environmental regulations, including CERCLA, RCRA, and Coursework, Pollution & Hydrology, CWA, as well as hazardous waste, stormwater, and other Princeton Groundwater, Inc., 2013 environmental requirements. She has native fluency in English f e ' IlllstIiira °ioiilins / and Spanish and has experience with the following software applications: Microsoft Office; ArcGIS; EPANET/HEC; AutoCAD; � elll�"'dilllill ° "°lilllllit Illl,lill °elllitet and LCA SimaPro.

Professional Engineer, Civil, CA
Experience
91310 2020
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Former Allied Signal Park One Site, Confidential Client, Areas of Los Angeles, CA
• Groundwater, Soil, and Soil Task Manager. Design task lead for interim and full-scale Vapor Treatment System groundwater containment system for treating 1,4-dioxane and Design and Operation chlorinated volatile organic compounds through groundwater • Environmental Monitoring and extraction, treatment through advanced oxidation process and Regulatory Compliance granular activated carbon, and reinjection. Managing design team in preparing interim groundwater containment system design, procurement, permitting, construction, and
commissioning. Managed design team in preparing 30% design package and report for a full-scale treatment system.

Coordinated field activities for pilot test construction, commissioning, operation, and decommissioning, and
developed pilot test completion report.

Task Manager: Newark, Confidential Client, Newark,
CA
Task Manager. Coordinated six consecutive semi-annual soil vapor and ambient air sampling event. Site was subject to post- closure permit, and sampling events were required to adhere to post-closure permit requirements. Sampling events included mobile lab soil vapor sampling onsite and in residential 22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 225

� Rebellion, ���
����� mu����""���x m �
����
' »��«�-�M��/�_�_
�� Engineer Environmental
.���D|[l[ - wood.
�� �� ���
backyards, and ambient air sampling using 6-L Summa canisters. Following sampling events, responsibilities included analytical data review and analysis as part of semi-annual report preparation.

Annual Point Cap Inspection, The John Stewart Company, Richmond, CA Project Manager. Perform annual cap inspection and prepare inspection report.

Residential Treatment Systems, Fairchild Airforce Base, Spokane, WA Engineering Field Staff. Performed site visits for residential groundwater treatment system design for treatmentofper- and po|yf|uorona|ky| (PFAS). Oversaw subcontractors performing field installation of treatment systems. Managed he|p|ine for issues related to treatment system installation and performance' and interim water supply provision.

North Hollywood Operable Unit, Confidential Client, Los Angeles, CA Engineering Professional. Developed design criteria fora 1'000 and 6'000 gallon per minute treatment system. Prepared equipment layouts, pump sizing calculations, and wellhead designs.

Vapor Mitigation System Plan and Report Development
Task Manager. Developed or reviewed the Site Management Plan, Institutional Controls Plan, Financial Assurance Plan, and other regulatory documents. Performed and coordinated ambient air sampling using Summa canisters and vent riser sampling using Ted|ar bags' including ensuring regulatory compliance for sampling frequency and detections.

MEW, Confidential Client, Mountain View, CA
System Engineering Professional. Coordinated weekly inspections, monthly sampling events' and regular maintenance and housekeeping for treatment system including groundwater extraction, advanced oxidation process and air stripper treatment, and discharge to storm drain. Monitored inspection forms and data collected to confirm treatment system operating parameters and compliance. Performed treatment system and well operation troubleshooting. Prepared annual progress report for submittal to the Environmental Protection Agency.

Treatment System Relocation, Confidential Client, Rancho Cordova, CA Responsible for preparing the design of the Southern Groundwater Study Area (SGSA) treatment system relocation. Responsibilities include coordinating access and stakeholder engagement, preliminary design preparation' cost estimation, and regulatory permitting and approvals.

Superfund Site Focused Feasibility Study, Confidential Client, San Jose' CA Technical Manager/Project Engineer. Supported thejoint preparation ofa focused feasibility study between several stakeholders for the subject Superfund site. Effort includes performing remedial technology scenario cost estimates, coordinating remediation scenario comparative modeling, and collaboratively drafting and reviewing focused feasibility study report components. 22pnopoovT.0282
Page zvfz
Exhibit 226

Jorge r , PG wood
Senior Geologist •
Summary Professional Summary
YeaiiirsMr.Jorge Perez has nine years of experience coordinating and with
s , t: telll�llllelll i °e managing groundwater monitoring and sampling programs, 9 (9 wth Wood) supervising drilling for groundwater and soil investigations, and Office of preparing and reviewing investigation reports. He is Costa Mesa, California experienced in supervising field programs and implementing drilling techniques including reverse circulation drilling, mud ww,, " till ° "°Illlllli rotary, sonic, hollow-stem auger, cone penetration testing, and Master of Science, Earth Science, dual tube percussion drilling methods. Jorge is experienced in UCSD, 2013 groundwater well and soil vapor probe installation and Bachelor of Science, Earth Science, sampling. He has supervised the collection of groundwater, soil UCSD, 2011 vapor and soil samples and has utilized various techniques for sampling.Jorge has also coordinated sampling programs for f e ' istIiira °ioiillnis / per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) investigations.

Celllr°tlill lilt °atlill lin / iceiiinises Experience Professional Geologist, CA 9682
2019 Remediation System Construction, Confidential Client, Areas ofIlllww, �Illeulr°Wliuse Vernon, CA
® Geology Task Leader. Responsibilities include coordinating with project manager to review general work plans, communicating with the • Management of Field Sampling client, maintaining documents, overseeing/coordinating and Investigations groundwater sampling events, and processing/evaluating ® Groundwater Sampling chemical data. Groundwater samples are collected using either low-flow pumping methods or no purge sampling (e.g.
• Drilling HydraSleeve®). Supervise the drilling and the installation of • Well Installation monitoring wells to depths of approximately 170 feet to assess groundwater conditions. Discrete groundwater samples are • Soil and Groundwater collected using a hydropunch tool and analyzed for volatile Monitoring Reporting organic compounds (VOCs). Well logs were prepared using the Unified Soil Classification System. Update and manage quarterly groundwater sampling and report.

Industrial Facility, Burbank, CA
Project Manager. Responsibilities include coordinating sampling events with client and groundwater team, evaluating data, updating technical reports, and conducting safety audits.

Groundwater samples are collected using dedicated low-flow sampling equipment at an approximate depth of 380 feet below ground surface.
22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 227

Jorge r , PG wood
Senior Geologist •
Port of Los Angeles (POLA) Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) and Restoration Services On-Call Contract
Field and Task Leader. Provided Phase 1/11 ESAs and monitoring/sampling support. Tasks for this on-call contract included budget planning, scheduling subcontractors, coordinating with POLA, overseeing field work (baseline soil and groundwater sampling, and soil excavations), processing and evaluating analytical data, and reporting. The baseline soil and groundwater assessments were conducted using hand auger sampling and direct-push drilling methods for the collection of discrete soil and groundwater. Sample results were compared to industrial regulatory screening levels (RSLs), including waste characterization criteria for metals, to establish baseline conditions and to assess potential future disposal requirements for soil. An additional soil and groundwater investigation was conducted in an area of a former rail line to support redevelopment. At this location, soil removal was performed to address soil results above RSLs.

Groundwater Monitoring, Southern California
Task Leader. Responsibilities included coordinating the gauging and sampling of approximately 300 wells, updating, and reviewing technical reports (semi-annual groundwater report, sampling and analysis plans, and health and safety plans), and processing and evaluating analytical data. Groundwater sampling plans are modified yearly to enhance the well networks integrity. Groundwater samples are collected using dedicated and non-dedicated low-flow sampling equipment.

On-Call Geoenvironmental Services, Groundwater Monitoring and PFAS Investigation, John Wayne Airport, Orange County, CA
Field Supervisor. Tasks for this on-call contract have included producing environmental baseline assessments of airport and tenant facilities; managing total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) free product recovery, groundwater monitoring (PFAS, TPH, and VOCs), and reporting for a former fuel farm facility; and implementing a free product inspection, groundwater monitoring, and reporting program for a new commercial fuel farm facility. Provide oversight for soil and soil vapor probe installation and analysis for various task orders.

Remedial Design and Treatability Study- Former Wax Paper Manufacturing and Printing Facility, Commerce, CA
Task Leader. Responsibilities included communicating with overseeing agency, maintaining documents, overseeing and coordinating groundwater sampling events, and evaluating analytical data to maintain the integrity of the well network. Groundwater samples were collected using low-flow pumping methods. 22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 228

Carynll , CPPS wood
Principal Toxicologist •
Summary Professional Summary
Caryn Kelly has 24 years of experience in toxicology, health risk eIllYs y, ta[telll�llllellli °e assessment, and air toxics regulations compliance. By working 24 (23 with Wood) closely with state and federal regulatory personnel, Caryn has Office of successfully completed these evaluations in compliance with risk assessment methodologies prescribed by the California Sacramento, California Environmental Protection Agency (e.g., Department of Toxic ww,, " till ° "'Illlllli Substances Control [DISC], various Regional Water Quality Control Boards [RWQCBs], and Office of Environmental Health Bachelor of Science, Environmental Hazard Assessment [OEHHA]) and the United States Toxicology, University of California Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). In addition to at Davis, CA, 1999 evaluating environmental remediation-related health risk, she f e ')istIiira °ioiillnis has focused on air quality compliance for the AB2588 program Celllr°tIIII IIII °atIlllolins IIII,icellllnises and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance.

Her technical experience includes data evaluation; exposure CPPS, September 2020 assessment; various fate and transport modeling, including Areas o Illlww,,�tll[telll�"�°Illlse vapor intrusion and off-site air dispersion modeling; and report preparation. Her areas of expertise include risk assessments • Environmental Risk Assessment performed for remedial investigations, state and federal • Air Quality superfund health risk assessments, state and municipal • Proposition 65 Compliance Brownfield redevelopment projects, CEQA evaluations, and risk- • Consumer Product Safety based support during remedial action plans (RAPS) and feasibility studies (FSs). Caryn also specializes in developing air monitoring plans for use during remedial work and estimating off-site neighborhood impacts to air quality prior to
implementation of remedial measures.

Experience
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Vapor Intrusion Investigation and Multiple Human
Health Risk Assessment (HH ), Confidential Client,
Southern California
Senior Associate/Principal Toxicologist. Provided overall review of the development of the risk-based approach to soil gas and indoor air monitoring in multiple off-site residential and commercial areas for a site under RWQCB oversight. Provided oversight of the HHRA development approach. Provided review of multiple HHRAs. Participated in regulatory negotiations with the RWQCB/OEHHA. Participated in public outreach meetings.

HHRA, Former Ford Aerospace and Communications
Corporation Facility San Juan Capistrano, CA
Associate/Principal Toxicologist. Provided risk-based strategies and support for several tasks during the Draft Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facility Investigation. Former 22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 229

Caryn Kelly, CPPS wood
Principal Toxicologist •
site operations included research, development, assembly, and testing of munitions, including 25 millimeter(mm) and 40 mm ammunition, and components. Both incremental and discrete soil samples were collected to characterize the nature and extent of potential munitions constituents at the three former firing ranges. Developed background threshold values to identify chemicals of potential concern for the human health and ecological risk assessment. Successfully performed the evaluation with minimal comments from DISC.The HHRA Work Plan successfully streamlined the HHRA process with a complicated conceptual site model (10 exposure areas, five environmental media, and five receptor populations). DTSC approved the work plan in less than two months, allowing quick progression to conducting the HHRA.

HHRA/Remedial Action Completion Report, Agri-Chemical & Supply, Inc., Oceanside, CA A vapor intrusion HHRA was initially prepared based on soil vapor sampling conducted at four shallow soil vapor probes.The indoor air quality assessment was conducted in accordance with the Interim Remedial Action Plan Excavation and Off-Site Disposal of Soil Containing Free Phase Hydrocarbon. Both the HHRA and a Conceptual Site Model report were submitted to the San Diego Department of Environmental Health to support closure of the site. Although the site did not meet all of the required criteria of the State Water Resources Control Board's Low-Threat underground storage tank policy, multiple lines of evidence were used to recommend site closure and that no further action be required.

HHRA from Construction and Diesel Particulate Matter, City of Santa Monica, Ocean Avenue Project, Santa Monica, CA
Senior Associate Toxicologist. Provided lead technical oversight in preparation of an HHRA that evaluated off-site health risks from construction-related Toxic Air Contaminant (TAC) emissions created by the redevelopment project. The project was proposed as part of the Ocean Avenue Project Environmental Impact Report project site. The objective of the risk assessment was to evaluate the potential health risks to neighboring commercial and residential building occupants from TAC emissions created during demolition, excavation, and grading. Health risks were compared to CEQA thresholds.

HHRA, FS and RAP, Demolition and Remediation of a Former Aluminum Manufacturing Facility, Vernon CA
Associate Toxicologist. Supported an HHRA prepared to assess areas of the site that warranted remediation based on an anticipated future industrial land use scenario. Risk-based remediation goals (RBRGs) were developed for Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), as total Aroclors and as Aroclor 1254, detected in concrete and soil. The RBRGs for PCBs took into considerations not only the Aroclor compounds but also the dioxin-like PCB congeners (congener-specific analysis). Considering the high costs associated with PCB congener-specific analysis, a statistical approach was developed based on the analysis of dioxin-like PCB congeners and Aroclors that was ultimately accepted by U.S. EPA, and the RBRGs for PCBs were approved. This approach allowed for cost-effective decision-making based on total Aroclor concentrations while satisfying U.S. EPA's concerns for the dioxin-like congeners.

Based on the findings of the HHRA, an FS/RAP was prepared pursuant to an Imminent and Substantial Endangerment and Consent Order issued by DISC, and a PCB Notification Plan (Plan) was prepared pursuant to the Toxic Substances Control Act for the PCB elements of the RAP. The remediation work under the RAP and Plan included 1) removal and off-site disposal of PCB-impacted concrete, 2) off-site disposal of PCB- and arsenic-impacted soils and shallow excavation, 3) design, construction and operation of a soil vapor extraction (SVE) system to mitigate chlorinated volatile organic compound (VOC)-impacted soil, and 4) design, construction, and operation of a bioventing/SVE system to mitigate Stoddard solvent impacted soil.
22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 230

Timothyi rCIH wood
Senior Associate Hygienist •
Summary Professional Summary
Tim Reinhardt has more than 39 years of experience as an ( Ill s ww,,�ta�telll�llllelll�i °e industrial hygienist/environmental scientist. He has prepared 39 (16 with Wood) and reviewed hundreds of site-specific health and safety plans Office of (HASPS) for contaminated sites, specifying controls and Seattle, Washington measurement methods to minimize occupational exposure to hazards during site investigation and remediation. He develops ww,, " till ° "°Illlllli risk-based criteria to protect public health from site cleanup Master of Science, Forest Resources, operations, and applies ambient air monitoring methods to University of Washington, 1987 demonstrate the effectiveness of emission controls when there Bachelor of Science, Environmental are sensitive receptors nearby. His comprehensive knowledge Science, Washington State University, of environmental health and safety (EH&S) regulations and 1982 liabilities gained from program development, implementation, f e' istiiratioiins / Celllr°tIIII IIII °atIlll lies technical support and hundreds of environmental, health and icesafety compliance audits help him anticipate and quickly Illl Certified
plied I recognize potential compliance problems.

Certified Industrial Hygienist, US, 5816
Tim has in-depth familiarity with EH&S compliance issues at Areas o Illlww,,�tll�telll�"�°Illlse diverse facilities, including government operations, electronics • Risk Assessor- Health and mechanical fabrication and assembly plants water/ • Safety/Occupational Health Engineer wastewater treatment plants, chemical plants, flammable and combustible liquid blending and packaging plants, automotive and truck maintenance, telecommunications, marine terminals and shipyards, aviation facilities, mines and mineral processing facilities, hazardous waste facilities, coal and gas-fired power plants, and natural gas utilities. His experience facilitates timely recognition of compliance problems.

Experience
HASP, Initial Assessment of PFAS Substances at Naval
Air Station Lemoore, Naval Facilities Engineering
Command Southwest, Lemoore, CA
Technical Lead. Reviewed potential hazards associated with installation, sampling and abandonment of temporary
groundwater monitoring wells, and redevelopment and
sampling of existing groundwater monitoring wells. Supervised development of a site HASP to characterize the distribution of Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in soils and groundwater. Reviewed Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry draft toxicological profile for PFAS, and adopted the occupational exposure limit for perfluorooctanoic acid from Germany as a representative compound for this class of chemicals. Established work practices and monitoring to verify remedial investigation teams were safe and not
overexposed to these chemicals and other site chemicals of potential concern during the site investigation work.
22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 231

Timothyi rCIH wood
Senior Associate Hygienist •
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment EH&S Compliance Audit, Confidential Commercial Client, Central CA
Led a comprehensive EH&S compliance audit of an agricultural product research/development lab and seed treatment facility.The audit reviewed the physical plant and operations for opportunities to improve regulatory compliance. Summarized action items needed to achieve compliance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration EH&S regulations and presented results to client management team.

Job Hazard Analysis/ Injury and Illness Prevention Program (IIPP), Confidential Commercial Client, Stanton, CA
When requested by legal counsel to review and update the IIPP at a metal finishing facility, a job hazard analysis was developed for diverse site operations, including a chemistry laboratory, anodizing and plating lines, abrasive blasting, and spray coating using materials such as hexavalent chromium [chrome(VI)], cadmium and nickel. After observing operations and controls, occupational exposure assessments were recommended for noise, chrome(VI), nickel and cadmium. The results drove improvements to spray booth, parts abrading, and dip tank facilities to reduce contaminant exposures as much as feasible, and improvements in personal protective equipment to control remaining exposures. Directed testing to demonstrate that occupational noise levels among staff using compressed air for parts cleaning and drying could be reduced below the action level by selecting low-noise air guns and reducing air pressure by a modest percentage. The IIPP was revised to include a hearing conservation program, cadmium compliance program, and controls for chrome(VI), as well as comprehensive revisions to the chemical hazard communication and Proposition 65 notification programs, respiratory protection plan, emergency action plan, and procedures for confined space, fall protection, lockout/tagout, forklift, flammable liquids, electrical safety, radiation safety, personal protective equipment and other health and safety compliance programs. Worked closely to educate staff in safety requirements and procedures and developed a compliance calendar with periodic action items to help the facility achieve regulatory compliance.

EH&S Compliance Audit, Confidential Commercial Client, Burbank, CA Project Manager/Technical Lead. Responsible for several third-party independent reviews more than 15 years of E&HS compliance issues at a high-pressure hydraulic pump and electrical instrumentation production plant for the aerospace industry. Reviewed status of compliance with all applicable regulations and code requirements for topics such as chemical safety, lockout-tagout, confined space entry, fall protection, flammable and combustible liquids storage and handling, compressed gases, personal protective equipment, spray coating operations, occupational noise exposure, and electrical safety.

Received subsequent requests to help the facility with specific compliance action items, including occupational exposure assessment and development of energy control procedures.

Multimedia EH&S Compliance Audit, Confidential Commercial Client, CA Lead H&S Auditor. Performed audits for three pharmaceutical manufacturing sites located in southern California for a due diligence pre-acquisition review. Worked under attorney/client privilege as part of an audit team.Wood's Compliance Manager software was used for the audit protocols and to generate reports to help the company evaluate the relative risk related to each audit finding and make corrective action decisions.The audits were conducted to assess the facility's compliance with federal, state, and local environmental requirements. Environmental media covered in the audits included air quality, wastewater/stormwater, hazardous and solid waste, spill prevention and control, storage tanks, emergency planning and community right-to-know, and toxic substances, as well as specific internal Corporate environmental requirements. Each audit consisted of an opening conference; thorough site walk to observe facility operations and EH&S management procedures; records review; and a closing conference to discuss preliminary findings.
22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 232

Maheshwar Mettu, PE wood
Associate Engineer - Environmental •
Summary Professional Summary
........................................................................................................................................................................

Yea
Mr. Mahesh Mettu has more than 20 years of environmental III�G ww,, tatlll�llllllli consulting and project management experience with private 20 (18 with Wood) and public-sector clients. He currently serves as the Southwest Office Division Liaison for Amtrak's national account and engages staff across multiple offices and states. He currently oversees and Costa Mesa, California serves as a Project Manager for a site with the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DISC) Imminent and Substantial Endangerment Order and refinery groundwater Master Science, Civil and remediation, treatment, and reuse system (GTS) operation & Environmental Engineering, maintenance (O&M) contract.

University of New Orleans, 2001
Mahesh routinely works with office practice leaders to scope, Bachelor of Science, Civil cost, and plan investigation and remediation projects and Engineering, Osmania University, support environmental compliance tasks. He has experience 1999 working with Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), �Registiiratioiins DISC, and other agencies and has assisted clients in project III"tIIIIIIII °atIIIIIIIn�G ,IIIIIIIniGG
planning, implementation, and management of interdisciplinary projects including contaminated site characterizations, vapor Professional Engineer, CA, C76447, intrusion assessments, and environmental site and remediation 2010 of sites where soils and groundwater were contaminated with Qualified Industrial Stormwater chlorinated solvents and petroleum hydrocarbons. He has Practitioner(QISP) for the California written remedial action plans (RAPS), evaluated remediation NPDES Industrial General Permit technologies and provided installation oversight of remedial 2014-0057-DWQ, 2020 technologies including, soil vapor extraction (SVE); ex-situ � G ww,, tatlll�"°Illlt groundwater treatment using air-stripping, biological treatment, and adsorption technologies.
• Project Management
Experience
• Site Investigations
/Remediation Amtrak National Contract
• VI Assessments Southwest Division Manager. Has been successfully managing ® Groundwater Treatment the southern California stormwater management services contract and management of ongoing Remedial Action
Systems O&M Objectives (RAO) project associated with the Amtrak LA Yard, as • Spill Prevention Plans well as managing various Amtrak projects from California to ® Storm Water Compliance Texas. Routinely engages Wood resources across states and offices to support Amtrak business and has successfully expanded Wood's support across northern California.
22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 233

Maheshwar Mettu, PE wood
Associate Engineer - Environmental •
Remedial Investigation and Risk Assessment, Amtrak Redondo Junction, Los Angeles, CA
Project Manager. Project involves ongoing site investigation, risk assessment, and feasibility studies conducted under a DTSC RAO. Supported the project in other roles (project engineer and task leader) during various phases of on-going activities for the site. Performed multiple rounds of site investigation activities at the site, and drafted sections of the remedial investigation (RI) report. Subsequent to completion of the RI, coordinated additional soil vapor investigations to update and draft Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA).

Led indoor air sampling planning and field activities (Summa canisters and long-term passive samplers (Radiello 130). Compiled, interpreted, and managed large and complex data sets. Supported business development activities, including proposal preparation, attending business and technical meetings.

Torrance Refinery Remediation Program, Torrance Refining Company, LLC, Torrance, CA
Contract Lead/Project Manager. Responsible for providing general consulting and engineering support for the refinery's 1,000-gallons per minute GTS.The GTS is a fixed-bed biological reactor with multimedia filter and liquid granular activated carbon vessels as polishers and the primary role for this contract is to manage and optimize GTS operations and reuse. Routinely oversees subcontractor-led GTS field operations and manages daily operations; reviews process and analytical data for system optimization; and reviews equipment and provided recommendations for spares. Prepares contractor work scopes for maintenance events that involves multiple refinery trades (mechanical, instrumentation, fixed equipment, etc.). Reviews reports prepared by the GTS operating contractor and coordinates the execution of work performed by refinery and 3rd party maintenance trades, including mechanical, electrical, instrumentation and controls, inspections, and supporting contractors. Leads monthly process O&M meetings and reviews safety, maintenance, and reporting metrics for client. Oversees work scope development and coordinates with 3rd party engineering resources for detailed design of GTS upgrades and modifications, including reviews of Issued for Approval, Issued for Construction, and related engineering packages.

Site Contamination Remediation, Inglewood, CA
Project Manager/Engineer. Responsible for O&M of a 500 standard cubic feet per minute SVE system for a site impacted with chlorinated hydrocarbons, primarily tetrachloroethylene and trichloroethene.

Supported project during planning, procurement, and installed an SVE unit. Supervised field teams for execution of scopes and coordinated facility management/tenants in efficient operations of the SVE system. Prepared remedial progress reports and project progress presentations to client and Los Angeles RWQCB. Prepared proposal drafts for principal review and attended business and technical meetings.

Performed indoor air evaluation at the site warehouse with office spaces. Coordinated with client and agency in order to perform the investigations. Evaluated data and prepared draft reports for risk assessor and project manager that documented the sampling leading to development of cleanup goals for the site.

The SVE system successfully removed significant quantities of volatile organic compounds to below site- specific cleanup goals.
22PROPGOVT.0282

Exhibit 2 234

EXHIBIT "B"

SUPPLEMENTAL SCOPE OF WORK
5 Exhibit 2 235

(IIII I III
April 1,2024
IIII I�I
Gustavo Romo
Deputy City Manager/Director of Community Development illllllillll dull IIlllllll ������� City of Bell Gardens I Community Development Department 7100 Garfield Avenue, Bell Gardens,California 91504
Re: Budget Increase Request for the Former Berk Oil Facility Former Berk Oil, Bell Gardens,California
Dear Mr. Romo,
WSP USA Environment& Infrastructure Inc. (WSP;formally Wood Environment& Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. [Wood]) is submitting this request for additional funds to continue on-going site investigation and remedy planning/implementation oversight at the former Berk Oil site located at 5600-5636 Shull Street in Bell Gardens,California.WSP investigation and remedy planning/implementation activities are being conducted pursuant to requirements of the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), which have included (among others) quarterly groundwater and soil vapor monitoring,construction implementation of the Data Gap Assessment and Data Gap Assessment Addendum, and implementation of a soil vapor extraction (SVE).These additional agency requirements were not fully funded in our current contract with the City of Bell Gardens (the City).

Scope of Services
Taskl includes quarterly groundwater and soil vapor monitoring as requested by the RWQCB in a letter to the City dated October 13,2023.This request included the following scope of services:
o^ Conducting four quarterly groundwater and soil vapor monitoring events. ou°^ Quarterly Sampling events consist of:
o gauging and sampling 5 existing groundwater monitoring wells. o purging and sampling up to 36 soil vapor probes.
o^ Preparing four quarterly groundwater and soil vapor monitoring reports. Each report will be finalized and submitted to the RWQCB Geotracker system following your review and approval.

Task2 includes implementation of the Data Gap Assessment and Data Gap Assessment Addendum pursuant to the RWQCB request to provide additional information on environmental-related conditions at the site and to support soil and soil vapor remedy of the site.

Task3 includes preparing the Cultural Resources summary report.

Task4 includes installation and maintenance of a SVE system to remediate impacted soil and soil vapor.

Exhibit 2 236

Budget Increase
The total budget increase request to complete the tasks identified above is$800,000.WSP will provide the services on a time-and-materials basis pursuant with our existing contract.

We appreciate the opportunity to continue assisting you on this project. If you have any questions, please contact Joseph Bande at (949) 466-0047 [email protected].

Sincerely,
WSP USA Environment& Infrastructure Inc.

Joseph Bande, PG 7058 D. Bruce Corkle
Principal Geologist Senior Vice President,
[email protected] California Business Leader
[email protected]
The information contained in all pages of this Proposal shall not be used in whole or in part for any purpose other than to evaluate this Proposal.

Provided a Contract is awarded to this offer,as a result oforin connection with the submission ofsuch information,Crane Hydro-Aire shall have the right to duplicate,use,or disclose the information to the extent provided in the resulting Contract.This restriction does not limit Crane Hydro-Aire's right to use information contained in this Proposal ifit is obtained from another source without restriction.The information subject to this restriction incorporates the entire Proposal.

Exhibit 2 237

CITY OF BELL GARDENS

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
f b .

AGENDAREPORT
Item 9.

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Michael B. O'Kelly, City Manager
BY: Gustavo J. Romo, Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A PARTICIPANT AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

FOR THE LOS ANGELES REGION IMAGERY ACQUISITION CONSORTIUM DATE: April 8, 2024
RECOMMENDATION:

It is staff's recommendation that the City Council:

1. Adopt the attached Resolution (Exhibit 1); and

2. Approve a Participant Agreement with County of Los Angeles (Exhibit 2)for digital mapping services citywide; and

3. Appropriate future appropriations for three annual increments of $8,546.66 for fiscal years 2025, 2026, and 2027 (for a total of $25,637.00) to fund participation in the Los Angeles Region — Imagery Acquisition Consortium 7 (LARIAC7); and

4. Find the proposed action exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3).

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

The Los Angeles Region Imagery Acquisition Consortium (LARIAC) was established in 2005 to provide accurate digital imagery and datasets to participants. Of the 88 cities in the County, 52 are LARIAC members; there are also 27 County Departments and 16 local, state, and federal agencies, and seven (7)educational institutions (Exhibit 3).

LARIAC collaboratively acquires valuable digital aerial data, including imagery and elevation data. By leveraging the combined buying power of the member agencies noted above, LARIAC reduces costs, enables participants to acquire more data than would be possible individually, and facilitates the use of consistent and comparable data over time valuable to informed decision making.

LARIAC is in its seventh cycle (LARIAC7) of digital aerial data acquisition and began initial data capture in early 2023 for this current cycle to update elevation data, footprint outlines for structures over 300 square feet, digital terrain, and current parcel information.

On February 15, 2022 (Exhibit 5) communication from the County of Los Angeles' Internal Services Department invited the City of Bell Gardens (City) to join LARIAC7. The need for LARIAC7 participation was established with the City's current development of an electronic permit and land use management system (PLUMS) to streamline customer service.

On May 1, 2023, City staff released a request for proposals (RFP) to seek the services of an experienced professional consultant to provide and implement a fully integrated permit tracking and land use management system 238

for online application and permit submission and payment of fees for all divisions within the Community Development Department. The proposal submittal deadline was May 31, 2023.

The proposals included managed systems for processing building permits, land use entitlement applications, inspections, plan check services, business licenses, code enforcement case management, and rental unit registry.

On October 23, 2023, the City Council authorized use of a California Energy Commission grant, budget appropriation, and a professional services agreement with Online Solutions, LLC (DBA Citizenserve) for PLUMS development and implementation. The system selected requires parcel-based geographic information system (GIS) capabilities for full integration, including an online payment system and compatibility with the City's recently launched mobile online application. LARIAC7 participation would also facilitate field staff to directly access site data and edit permits and inspections electronically. To make full use of the range of benefits the PLUMS project anticipates, access to geographic information systems is necessary.

As presented in the communication to the City, the cost of membership is $25,637 for three (3) years, at $8,546 per year.

Budget allocation would need to be made for future fiscal years, with the cost itemized in annual department budgets.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to the CEQA, Guidelines Section No. 15060(c)(3), this report is categorically exempt as organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment are exempt from the CEQA since the activity is not defined as a project.

CONCLUSION:

Participation in LARIAC7 would improve the electronic permit and land use management system anticipated to enhance the overall functioning of the City, making it more efficient, transparent, and responsive to the needs of its residents and businesses for effective and efficient delivery of public services. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution and approve the Participant Agreement to fund regional cooperation and leverage foundational geographic information assets to develop the Community Development Department's electronic permit tracking and land use management system and to support decision-making, business, and research applications.

Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution and approval of a Participant Agreement commencing in the 2024-2025 Fiscal Year.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No current impact for this fiscal year. However, approval of the Participant Agreement would require a future appropriation of$8,546 annually for the next three years for a total of$25,637.

ATTACHMENTS:

Exhibit 1 - Resolution No. 2024-18
Exhibit 2 - Participant Agreement with Attachments
Exhibit 3 - Member Agencies
Exhibit 4 - Benefits
Exhibit 5 - Lettter From LARIAC 7 digitized
239

APPROVED ELECTRONICALLY BY:

Michael B. O'Kelly, City Manager
Stephanie Vasquez, City Attorney and/or Susie Altamirano, Assistant City Attorney Manuel Carrillo, Director of Finance and Administrative Services 240

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-18

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELL

GARDENS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING A

PARTICIPANT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF BELL

GARDENS AND THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR THE LOS

ANGELES REGION IMAGERY ACQUISITION CONSORTIUM ("LARIAC") PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Bell Gardens ("City") requires digital property imagery and data services to support an electronic permit tracking and land use management system for the Community Development Department; and
WHEREAS, the Los Angeles Region Imagery Acquisition Consortium ("LARIAC') collaboratively acquires valuable digital aerial data, including imagery and elevation data, leveraging the combined buying power of the member agencies to reduce costs and facilitate the use of consistent and comparable data; and WHEREAS, LARIAC is in its seventh cycle ("LARIAC7") of digital aerial data acquisition; and
WHEREAS, LARIAC7 would improve the electronic permit and land use management system anticipated to enhance the overall functioning of the City, making it more efficient, transparent, and responsive to the needs of its residents and businesses for effective and efficient delivery of public services; and WHEREAS, the LARIAC7 cost would be $8,546 per year for a three-year cycle; and WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into a Participant Agreement with the County of Los Angeles for LARIAC membership.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Bell Gardens as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council, after consideration of the staff report and evidence presented to the City Council, hereby finds that the above recitals are true and correct and incorporates them herein.

SECTION 2. The City Council approves a Participant Agreement with the County of Los Angeles and authorizes and directs the City Manager to execute the LARIAC Participant Agreement, subject to City Attorney approval as to form.

SECTION 3. Subject to all applicable laws, the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute any ancillary documents relating to the Participant Agreement, including any amendments, extensions, and other documents consistent with the Participant Agreement and this Resolution.

Exhibit 1 241

Resolution No. 2024-18
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall attest and certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, enter it into the book of original Resolutions, and it shall become effective immediately upon its approval.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 8t" day of April 2024.

THE CITY OF BELL GARDENS
Jorgel Chavez, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

Stephanie Vasquez Daisy Gomez
City Attorney City Clerk
[Signatures on the following page]
Exhibit 1 2 A

Resolution No. 2024-18
I, , City Clerk of the City of Bell Gardens, hereby CERTIFY that City Council Resolution No. was adopted by the Bell Gardens City Council at a regular meeting of the City Council held on and was approved and passed by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Exhibit 1 343

2024

PARTICIPANT AGREEMENT
(Engagement: Los Angeles Region — Imagery Acquisition Consortium 7 ("LARIAC7") Project)
(Parties: City of Bell Gardens and County of Los Angeles.)

1. IDENTIFICATION
THIS PARTICIPANT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Bell Gardens ("City"), a California municipal corporation and the County of Los Angeles ("County"), a political subdivision of the State of California. Each individual city, district, educational institution, or agency is referred to herein individually as a "Participating Entity" and collectively as the "Participating Entities." The County and the Participating Entities are hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Parties" and each individually as a "Party".

2. RECITALS
WHEREAS, County has planned to acquire new digital orthogonal and oblique aerial imagery in the winter of 2023 Project;
WHEREAS, County has become aware that various Participating Entities have similar projects currently underway or plans to undertake similar projects in the near future;
WHEREAS, in order to avoid the duplication of efforts and costs by the Parties, the Parties desire to pool their resources to collectively undertake the Project; and WHEREAS, the Parties intend to participate in the Project upon the terms and conditions set forth herein below.

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions herein contained, City and Consultant agree as follows:

3. DEFINITIONS
"Effective Date": Date of when Agreement is fully executed by all Parties.

4. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to provide a vehicle for the collective participation in the Project by the Parties. The Project shall focus on the acquisition of certain aerial imagery digital data which may include, but are not limited to, products listed in Attachment A ("Digital Data"). It is the intent of the Parties that Digital Data shall be acquired under this Agreement for areas within the County of Los Angeles covered by the jurisdictions of the Parties.

5. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE COUNTY
Exhibit 2 244

5.1 Identify and provide specifications for Digital Data (or their derivatives) to the contractors hired to complete the Project.

5.2 Develop all necessary procurement documents for necessary services to be provided by one or more qualified contractors in connection with the acquisition and administration of the Digital Data.

5.3 Select the most qualified contractor or contractors to provide the necessary services in connection with the acquisition and administration of the Digital Data and thereafter, manage the entire acquisition and administration of the Project.

5.4 With the assistance of one or more selected contractors, provide Quality Control ("QC") for all Digital Data delivered under this Agreement.

5.5 Arrange for the delivery of the Digital Data (or portions thereof) to the Participating Entity upon Project completion.

5.6 Provide monthly reports to the Participating Entities on the status of the Project.

6. THE PARTICIPATING ENTITY HAS THE RIGHT TO

6.1 Participate in identifying and providing technical specifications for the Digital Data (or their derivatives).

6.2 Provide currently available geodetic points (with necessary standards and accuracy) for County's QC process.

6.3 Acquire additional digital aerial products from the contractors through this Agreement, provided that a Statement of Work is provided. County assumes no liability for the completion of these products.

7. MUTUAL RESPONSIBILITIES; MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTION
The Parties shall be mutually responsible for the following:

7.1 Financing the acquisition and administration of the Digital Data including, but not limited to, costs related to QC and the subsequent distribution thereof. The total cost of such acquisition and administration (Total Cost) shall be allocated among the Parties and the Participating Entities. The portion of the Total Cost allocated to a Party hereunder shall be hereinafter referred to as the Party's "Maximum Contribution." Each Participating Entity will transfer its Maximum Contribution to a LARIAC account which has been established by the County for this Project (LARIAC Account) and as further described in Paragraph 8 of this Agreement.

The Maximum Contribution of the Participating Entity shall be $25,637.

7.2 In the event the Project is terminated for any reason before the execution of any contract with a contractor for the provision of goods and/or services in connection Exhibit 2 245

with the Project, each Participating Entity shall be refunded its Maximum Contribution (or such portion of the Maximum Contribution as shall have been paid to the County by such Participating Entity) in its entirety.

8. PAYMENT OF MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTION; ADMINISTRATION OF LARIAC

ACCOUNT

8.1 A Participating Entity shall have the following options in paying its Maximum Contribution to the County hereunder:
i. The Participating Entity may elect to pay its Maximum Contribution to County in its entirety upon execution of this Agreement. ii. The Participating Entity may elect to pay its Maximum Contribution to County as follows: (a) fifty percent (50%) of the Maximum Contribution upon its execution of this Agreement; and (b)fifty percent (50%) upon delivery of the Digital Data to the Participating Entity.

8.2 The LARIAC Account established by the County in connection with the Project, shall be subject to the following:
i. All funds held in the LARIAC Account shall be used solely for the payment of contractors selected by County to provide goods and services in connection with the Project.
ii. Any funds held in the LARIAC Account not expended upon the completion of the Project or the termination of this Agreement shall be held, administered, and returned to Parties based on their prorated contribution to the total costs of the Project.

9. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

9.1 This Agreement shall take effect upon execution and shall remain in effect through final delivery of all Digital Data and through the duration of the license use term.

9.2 The term of this Agreement may be extended by an Amendment to this Agreement.

9.3 It is the intention of the Parties that the Participating Entity shall receive, with the delivery of the Digital Data, an unlimited irrevocable perpetual, royalty free license. The license may be used to, modify, edit, reuse, reproduce, translate, create derivatives, compile, other works based upon the Digital Data, and combine the data with other contents selected by the Participating Entity in its own operation, with an unlimited number of seats; including, but not limited to Internet and intranet applications, copying, and printing.

9.4 The Participating Entity shall have the right to transfer, sublicense, and distribute any form of media either now known or hereinafter desired the Digital Data to its subcontractors or consultants on projects which are outsourced from its own operations. In this connection, the Participating Entity shall require each subcontractor or consultant to whom the Digital Data is transferred to execute a written acknowledgement Exhibit 2 246

and agreement to abide by such Participating Entity's license to use the Digital Data.

Such acknowledgement and agreement is provided in Attachment B (Los Angeles Regional Imagery Acquisition Consortium (LAR-IAC) 7 Authorized User Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreement).

9.5 Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, a Participating Entity shall not have the right to sell, resell, or otherwise transfer its license to use the Digital Data to any other person or entity.

9.6 This Agreement may be amended or modified by County only after collaboration and consultation with the Participating Entities.

9.7 Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give any person or entity, other than the Parties hereto, any legal or equitable right, remedy, or claim under or in respect to this Agreement or any provision contained herein. This Agreement and the provisions hereof are intended to be and are for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Parties.

9.8 No Party may terminate its participation under this Agreement after the execution of contract(s) for the acquisition of the Digital Data without the prior written consent of County.

9.9 Any other California city, special district, agency, or educational institution may become a Participating Entity under this Agreement if:
i. Such entity executes this Agreement,
ii. Such entity makes its Maximum Contribution to County as provided for under this Agreement. Any such contribution shall be deposited into the LARIAC Account and administered in accordance with subparagraph 8.2 of this Agreement.

10.0 This Agreement may be executed in counterparts and the signed counterparts shall constitute a single instrument. The signatories to this Agreement represent that they have the authority to bind their respective party to this Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Participant Agreement for the Los Angeles Region — Imagery Acquisition Consortium 7 Program on the date indicated below.

PARTICIPANT ENTITY COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
City of Bell Gardens INTERNAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
By: By:

Michael B. O'Kelly, City Manager
Date: Date:

Approved as to form-
By-
Stephanie Vasquez, City Attorney
Exhibit 2 247

ATTACHMENT A

DIGITAL DATA
All data will be acquired in 2023 unless otherwise noted.

Orthogonal Imagery
• 4-band orthogonal imagery (including color infrared) at 4-inch or better resolution in the urban areas, and 9-inch or better in the National Forest. • Multiple formats (TIFF, JPEG2000, and compressed ECW).

Oblique Imagery
• 3-band color oblique imagery at 4-inch resolution.
• Online hosted access for desktop and mobile devices.

Building Outlines
• Building outlines updated for all buildings over 300 square feet.

Digital Terrain Data
• LIDAR point cloud including all elevation data (QL1 or better). • Digital Terrain Model (DTM) — bare earth data derived from LIDAR. • Digital Surface Model (DSM) - building and tree tops derived from LIDAR. • Digital Elevation Model (DEM) — bare earth data optimized for processing. • 1-foot contours for urban areas, and 2-feet contours for the National Forest.

Additional Data Product(s) as Feasible
• Additional high resolution image acquisitions throughout the three-year cycle. • Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI).
• Solar Model.
• Raster Tree Canopy Model.
• Raster Building data Model.
• Hillshade.
• Slope.
• Raster Height Model.
• 3D mesh.
• Street-level imagery and derived products.
• Other additional derived GIS data products.

Exhibit age 7 248

ATTACHMENT B

LOS ANGELES REGIONAL
IMAGERY ACQUISITION CONSORTIUM (LAR-IAC) 4,LAR-IAC5,LAR-IAC6,LAR-IAC7

AUTHORIZED USER

CONFIDENTIALITY AND NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT(NDA)

1. Pictometry International Corp., a Delaware company with offices at 25 Methodist Hill Drive,Rochester,NY 14623 (`Pictometry"),and the County of Los Angeles(`County")have entered into that certain agreement dated December 3, 2013 as amended from time to time(`Agreement")for delivery of licensed digital mapping data and software (`Licensed Products")to the County. Under the Agreement,certain governmental entities(`Authorized Entities"), including County Departments and non-County Authorized Participants,which participate in the LAR-IAC may be granted copies of or otherwise provided access to the Licensed Products through a Participant Agreement.

2. Pursuant to Paragraph 11.2(Authorized Users)of the Agreement,Licensed Products may only be accessed or otherwise used by an Authorized User,which includes any contractor or consultant of an Authorized Entity using the Licensed Products either at the facilities of such Authorized Entity or for any Project(as defined below)of such Authorized Entity.

3. The undersigned is an Authorized User of an Authorized Entity under the Agreement and desires to use the Licensed Products solely for internal,noncommercial use and for purposes no greater than reasonably needed to achieve the objectives of an actual project undertaken in connection with the relationship with the Authorized Entity (`Project").

4. The undersigned Authorized User understands and agrees that the Licensed Products contain proprietary,trade secret and/or confidential information(`Confidential Information")of Pictometry. Therefore,by signing this Authorized User Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreement(`NDA"),the Authorized User agrees to use the Licensed Products solely for the Project,which is a nonexclusive,nontransferable and non-assignable right,from the effective date of this NDA until the expiration or termination of the Project for which the undersigned Authorized User was engaged by the particular Authorized Entity.

5. Pictometry and the County acknowledge that the Agreement and certain information and documentation(collectively, "Records")may be subject to public record requests(e.g., California Public Record Act Request or Freedom of Information Act Request)or other compelled legal disclosure requests(e.g.,a subpoena or warrant)(collectively, "Compelled Disclosure Requests"). Should the Authorized Entity reasonably believe that Records,in whole or in part, are subject to production via a valid,properly submitted Compelled Disclosure Request,the Authorized Entity will promptly notify County and Pictometry of such request providing five(5)days advance notice prior to producing any of the requested Records. Pictometry explicitly reserves the right to object to any such production and to pursue any and all remedies it has in both law and in equity to prevent the release of such Records. The Authorized User and the Authorized Entity, at Pictometry's expense, shall reasonably cooperate with Pictometry in connection with the foregoing.

6. The undersigned Authorized User agrees to protect and maintain any Confidential Information the Authorized User is given access to under this NDA using at least the same protections and to the same extent the Authorized Entity uses to protect and maintain its own confidential information of a similar nature.

7. To the extent any Confidential Information that is not in the public domain is revealed through the operation or other use of the Licensed Products,the Authorized User agrees that it will not make use of,disseminate or in any way disclose such Confidential Information without the County's prior written consent,which County may first need to obtain from Pictometry.

Exhibit page 18 249

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned Authorized User,by his/her authorized signature, agrees to all terms and conditions of this NDA as of the date set forth below.

AUTHORIZED USER:

Signature: Address:

Name:

Organization: City/Zip:

Date: Phone:

AUTHORIZED BY:

Signature: Date:

Name: Authorized Entity:

Title: County's Project Director:

Note: Submit completed form and a copy of the contract between the Authorized Entity and the Authorized User that details the"Project"to Dr. Steven Steinberg"LA IAC Project Director,at SSteinbera(&isd.lacounty.aov and Cc'An Dang,LARIAC Project Manager,at adang(a isd.lacounty.gov for review and approval.

Exhibit page 19 250

Map 1: Areas for Orthogonal Imagery Products
IE:IRIN
COUNTY
/ ,
irisaiuw.luau arcm«r«rmum«eiuuuuu luau aaun l oam u ula«au auaurn««nrm ourrramrrufm«eunu im>',»mc uriufm««(rufrrufufauumr lttrruL.«unmuuuuuuuu;auau arsnnwu rrrr:ulruuWi iuw mu«mrrrmr�fnumilffamajj urnifua,uaunhu arcu.ni ur,rir,su,rmu/u:aorta/it ,fuuruu/u„u,r,/iriaii„uiuu'.u ,rrrr,ir�ini'-rrrmrnuu/m,ulufw,r,rruwuuauu/lama/ur/uui„uruu �r��uanu,,,uul,l.urrmarrmuulrmr�i' ,riff, �...... rrrrrrr, r,r,,,.r,,,f r „r�:.:rJ ,.,.,� r-�� r��,,.. r ,.,,;,. r r i, /
(I IIlI
'rr iif a �.ral ,rr ,. r ri l.' r I r, rl r I , , ,% , roi°rfi lirr rlr . /f /.t. r.. lr . fr, r r �.1,. r,.. r... 1. D 1. 1 ,. .,�.J . ll, f...l. I .l 1 J, 0.1.. ff l 1.1 �1..../ . „If l� J11f,11rJrflr Ilrrl ri Ir/, r 11�1 Irl11 fIICJ 11 IJ1 FlllrJ 7 1/I rill J�Illl,lrl ( Ir,/Irr pl rlrr,rl,,l lllllff,lr Ply/III„ill,a a"(j gin;lJl�lr,1111r III(V1lfiUlllrl�llr(Dl.,,r 1111U rl�r,rrllull/�f1111�U�,Il((((fillr5,va lllPl'i Irk J(` ii!RI' ilJrr�1 111111�1 Jlrrllr(frr",l},,7 r � r / r � r f
irmuru,ifn „ uuoiau kulrnu vie „am fu,i ur umr,umum:uununu,rofunim r,nfm n aar r »mrr,nnr�,.urr lama rurtnuul,;,rrr r unai,auiu r, ,:.uvo/r„/i,r�rirn ruff,ri r ni ,r is r. iIIIn ,r/f r i ifi.✓r. /.r. �aa rr '.'i, /. ,✓ r'r.. r / /r � ✓a.. r:iff a...il l i./. li.I ll i..l....w 11 if. 1 l /.i. Alf..✓. 1 fl....., ..h /111111C/r,IINI ,111111/IIIIJYaII�r���JICIIH)yrfllllrMllfr/Jrt lllf�IVfIff"I�rllY/IIMrr/IIIr(U}/ lff lllllrrllf1111rnl�rr ((IrrJJlllr rrrllW�((f(IllffrrlUtll ((r1111J)J%IIII II€II lffffflll111fff lEfffllPJ((IIIIIIIIff IIII�ICfIIIJ��PrrII J1J111� rrr,„1inr, „rrr, lru„f,I,l r, , r���,,,�„� u„���r,�,l „r„rr,„/u» ,,,,,,��n��, ,r�I�,lA,AI;�A�,or1l�1rnl�„rrr, ��», un,uruHr'!i « i «
��„j ,.jljn:�rr,, „riij ,,,rr„rr�� , i�� « mwara UlUlUll�MEE �mm uuu mir'r''rr,m mwuurwm�ur,.uuuuu trio iuuuwuurrtu uuu VENTURA ,,uurrJflriunrrrr rU u;rr»iu`rrlr�i fr"«r, ,r,, „ rlr.I itlrllrt�� ��N � Nuilrr>LNII»r air ui Ihl�lllrrurIII COUNTY
fla �u�lel21 �IE2 Milli �Ilil ui�u luu luiluu luau wiuu luu luu l�l�lu iwR IIIJ %//!!ll II /l un,rmr�nrrru �, PROJECT 1
of rmoiu«n,rruiii » l� N I N ' I11
lei �lel �utlu ___RE in EMIT NE1181�
m«auurrrruramurrnuxni�r ulu rrraivau�uurninrnn««awl mriaulV������1 ��I���I����I���I � -���m����������oss III 11 1 A��A �r� r mrlrilunrrdnurlrariuximu,ilai i rrr r/% Il / Sri r rrn ����I ..V����B����I���r / r °.uuur«rr/i,�i''irrn I(%((UUlllJlllffilll%9lrrll%Ill r il':ri 1�11-.li lrllf m Hunt( �r nufuuiilum rr a(�1 «n ui jlll / /�((f91lfl1r'lllrilll%��iurllPl �/�2 err rnr:rrnuu n,mru„rnarrrrrrrr,nrrri«„ uru�muu , u,r. �P���� r��, rir„nur flu m „ur, ,u rut"rl r t
i 1 1 r nu' f Iona/ulu;/ui i un«mm um/unu Grfil ,rai/,n/ /:,imuouur uau/i nriiuuus ,um( /1 .��u m.. %iiili uuu irGuairl° 1i n mi mrnm�mulrrrmiummu«rwm»1„ 1,nrrrun»>mf(n «a»r»im ni uu«u m imam« «r»r»ei m «e rrm kff 1: rrru rr ii «ru d,am unnuiuuu ail nimu umru xrrrrm..u.rrr«uoeaiurdwu rum mr nuu rruA..,a r,u,. rm,rrmmur iirur nnn,rrrn mo urarrr uwrru mr r ,ripe r mi rr �f/n ra ufuu miliuli,i./J iUiuuuu lufliin wu nrfli ri,nuu/idu nNi ,r u,rr run rut,roof/Ill ulri un,flu us rl , ru iru -:� ur,uhu %Ir,.nGi4rua,uui11il,,er�,r r,,'AI' -�murrfliu'fr/iwu`l..'n,m �iirraruwrGlr;lfJ r„ . ur,,fuuuii,{i«n ¢rnr..�i, 1r.'r'r,%G;nai «eii.,:i" ,Rrlmuiir:
arodAlEI
„
',il1' r , rut nr ml l/iu«(lull rrunu r ,flu///i » n rrJ,fu7ru iBEiRo-i
rr fr f: r, r rI! 1 1 fI�iir t "nJ W:„OV,Ua'I"U"Y �ur valf�rll�i�rr rlP�l/�����,,1r r,�f «imr l/�/� rime ru2a1111r n1�1991%1 ur'uy1�TlGi INSET MAP:Catalina Island
all, IivsRS11Dis
C WIN y
IUl 11/IIJilgllllf% IIIIIIIII "� rll`iiGm i, rlmurJi i11%r'r tii�/ ««r�r11 r it
uu nllailrauur�nu rr�a II" t ""
uu ;-uuuuuurrrmu°« � uu°°
�»m inuu/Howl(((( rn orffm �f r ill//
Ui, uli n/i/aimh r/i/um ii ifr�uuiirn ii uu»uu,»r m r rdn,nmfru r umrnm / ,!all
1 all
7 1111//Illllllfllll///I IIII rr„ III IIII U rrrr r ,n���llf/ rr \, Uri! IfIIUJ fI/rlUJllll(lf�U r(F11111
auuulfoyrrrrmim a wmi �� I rrrlr I/
0IRAINGU.
aliPROJECrT anrri� n1y/II III /IVr rfI a COUNTY rr�rrr ru oilrnmlli «m rn, m, r «r�u�� i
Ivrr�AREA luunwoulm U�
vrrru /r rmuuaoNlar n �u,nrrrlll" \
'If
r/rn�luirrrmi�eiir/Irairrrnui � � «r«r„
N
J,,,'Jill
�ffilill:r k 1111 1k Neu'all
Legend01
la F/Afl]
Los Angeles Region -
01 ttl5 AG[lC5 ,
Imagery Acquisition Consortium a (J
Area 1-4 inch
Area 2-1 foot LOS ANOELES COUNTY
Ortho Imagery Grid Project Areas and Tile Grid 320W Department le St.Regional Planning 320 rt Temple St.

Los Angeles County Boundary Los Angeles,CA 90012 March 5,2009
Exhibit page 110 251

Map 2: Areas for Oblique Imagery Products
KEIRIiN
COUNTY
�1 IIIIIIIIIIIIUDDD II Ull➢U111i111111U111»11 i u iiu liiwiil»I »» l
COUNTY
IIIIIIInnnnnnllinn rnnnnnrl(Y nlyi !!l�i�Ii'I IIII��II�I�� I��II ij
�«rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
r>iiii� � it
ff ,
J11 allll it »�luliii 1 »/ ,o, I r � f 1
,
"S "M n
111 l/� mtAR1131uINO
i Wry
INSET MAP:Catalina Island
11l,VkI1112-
ll� `
1 � ORlwiGu= ,
I i i Ifllll;
COUNTY
01 V
N
A
Oblique Imagery Types Los Angeles Region -
Image Capture Type Imagery Acquisition Consortium '� 1e5�N ins "rFaMm VIVIVDVIVIVDVIV�Community 2-Way,No Neighborhood � o ���v— + uivau�iuivay�Community 2-Way,Neighborhood 4-Way Oblique Imagery Grid

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
Community 2-Way,Neighborhood 8-Way Department of Regional Planning Community 4-Way,No Neighborhood and Capture Types t.

Los n Temple 9
Los Angeles,CA 0012
Community 4-Way,Neighborhood 4-Way March 13,2013 Exhibit page 111 252

EXHIBIT 3

MEMBER AGENCIES

LARIAC PARTICIPANTS
ARO
'rie
City of AJgou ra Hills j
j City of Arcadia
City° of ZUS3j
Ci Beff'Ro °er
City, of Beverly HUi , X X X X City of Burba,,,nk X X X X X j City, of Crory X Xj
City of Cerritos
City of Claremont:

City of Covi"lla X X,
j City of Culver City X X X X ity of C�mm on IB r
} City,of Dometl" X
CitV of Duarte
i
City of EI Monte,
City of E I Segundo X XI X X.

Citj of Gardema X Xj
j City, of Mole X X X X
City of Hermosa, Beach X j
C it Ind try
�city of I nglewoord X XjX X Xj City,of Irwindale X XI I
City,of La C-cuiada IFliintrid e X X X X X.

C io L Y ,Ire Heights
City of Lakewood
City, of Lan,caste:r X
j City of Long Eeach
C it of Los Angeles X X i
oftib
Citwy,of Moi)ro is
City of Monterey Park. X
City of Norwalk j
j City of Palmdale
City° of Palos Verdes, Estates j
City of Plasarler
City, of P`ieo Rivera
Citj of Rancho Palos 'e des IX XI
City of Reclondb Beach X X X.

City of San Dire
Cit,j of am Ferrrrto
C i t,y of Sa n ta C[aNrita X X X X XI Cif of Santa Fe C rig gee X X XI
City of Santry rrot-i[ca X I X
Exhibit 3 253

EXHIBIT 3

MEMBER AGENCIES
City of Signal Kdl I IX
Cit; of Sodh El `bnt jx —X I I I
City of South Pisacfena Ix
City Gf Temple City x x
CitV of"Ton-ance x x x x x City of West covina x
it of West Hol ly w e Ix x x
x x x
City of Westlake Village
city of'Whttief
Afyi,cultuilul C0111MI S'S[OnPlVeights x x x x x X and UeMlfres'
Ani'mal Car & Control x x x x x Arts Czmmiss[an x x
x x
Assessor x x x x
Auditor Controller x x
Beac',hes & Harbors x x x x x x &aard of Supervisors Executive x x Off' [C&
Chief:Execulive OfficeJO,ffice of
Erro r enc IMan3gemeat
Child Support SeTvices x x
hill Ten & Family Services x x llx x x Consumer Affairs x x
cormar x x
F ire x jx
Health Berrie I x x x x x x tnte-mal Sejrvices 'Deparlment jx x x x Library X, x X x x MeantalHealth X, x x x x X,
Pads & Recreation x x x X x Probation x x x X. X.

PUbfirHealth Ix x Ix
Public sodul Seirvtes, X x x x x 7F6-71-ilic wa jx x x x x x Regional', Fllannft lx x x I X, x �Reoi,,",strar-R�e,cord1e!rlCounty Clerk x x i IX, 7�fi�iff x x X x x I Tra-3SLIF&T and, Tax 'Collecfor jj x Vorkforce, Development, Aging, x X x x and Com,musn ity, Services X
Local, Sratq, and'Federa)'Agencoes
Alameda Gofridar Trzaasportaton x
'Authority
Amims ide Las Ri'os, x
California Departmeet of
Trans partation I
Catall"41a lsland Cuiservancy X x x x x x Los Angeles Air For Base x X,
Los,Angeles Colunty Matfopo flit an x x
Transit Authority (MTA)
wu�t,Angeles Countyan n Xitatio No. 254 x I

EXHIBIT 3

MEMBER AGENCIES
Los-Angeles Region an X X
Inform Ne abaii twork (LARC31N),
IPort of Los Angeles jX X, X X X X.

Port ref Long, Be,,,ich 1, X X Sa,'nta Catalina Island Gonservancy X X X X, S-,rota C.-larita Val,Iey eater Agency X X Southern Califorma Associafionof X
(Sovemni,ents,
Southern Galifofta Edison X X
(C,atafina Isl"and')
US, Gealogtcal "B,,u e I X X
US, Natibna] ,Givard X, X
'Water Replenishment Distdcloaf X, X X SOLIthern California
E,d,,tica,,tj,ona,l,iti,srit,titions
P;31os Verdes on the N,ET X
C-afibrnia State, U river siti, C Kann el X Islands
Californizi State Poily tee hnfcal X, X
University, Pomona
Calit ornia State University, Long X, X X, X X X Beach
Califunia StLqte iL niversiti, Los X
Angeles
California State Un�ver!sity, X
Noirthiridge
Claremont Lhiiversity Cons,odium X
Rio Hondo CommUhit., College X y
I ,i, Marymounf, Uni�versity Loyok X,
Uiniversity of S,outhern, California —X X X University ofCalifornia at Los X.

Angel,es
Exhibit 3 255

EXHIBIT 4
Benefits
DIGITAL AERIAL IMAGERY AND ELEVATION SENEF1 'S
Digital aerial imagery and elevation data: provide valuable support for decision making will-tin agencies, as well as cost savings FOr operations.. High quality iinraage data enables staff to, make virtual site visits that. ornproves, and may replace field work, reducing information colAection costs,. Some examples, inictude.

It Public Safety: Fire and Police personnel can plan for and "see"Hie location of incidents and addresses,, iimporoving dispatch, crime analysis, incident response, and officer safety.
• Public Works, Reduces the need for field v1sits, supp4.)rts traffic and pavement managernent., ston"n drain and flood protection, and enhances project planning and infrastructure management.
• Planning. Improves ciade enforcement, site plan review, and understanding impacts of new projects.
• Economic Development: Improves outreach to businesses by providing detailed site information for potential developments and surrounding areas.. • Disaster Planning and Response: Improves planning and iFesp�onse before, during, and after disasters, providing a foundation for a Common Operating Picture. • Community Outreach. limpToves, cornmUnicatilanwith residents by providing a picture, lot the area of discussion, increasing citizen engagernent- • Operation all Efficiency: A consistent view of a, city or agency supports cofiaboration, integration, and efficiency to lower operational costs.

LARIAC BENEFIT'S
High resolution data provided through, LARIAC data offers key beriefits, when compared to aerial imagery from online providers ("free mapp ling,webs i' es"like ke, Goag Ile:o r Bing,), and off-th e- shelf vendors. These include:
* Enhanced resolution (4-inch rather than 1-foot) shows greater detail and provides rnoife information (you can see manhole covers and road striping); * Unparalleled accuracy (+I- 2-feet accuracy) ensures information captured from the imagery is in: the right: tocalion, supporting facilities managenient, planning, and operations;
* Breadth of products (,orthogonal and oblique imagery,, building footprints, and elevation data,y to support of city or agency's business needs,'
* Multiple access methods, including desktop, handheld', and mobile, as well as local and remotely ho&tecl solutions to eliminate agency hardware, and software casts" * Variety of formats and compressed formats to enable lurse within existing applications, in the field;
* Access to histoMcall data froin previous LARIAC image acquisitions to assess change over Urne, and
* Complete control of LARIAC data, products, Including availabifity for use by your contractofs. LARIAC participationall'ows for data use and deployment across your entire agency in all applications, from planning to emergency services to public works.

One of the key benefits of LARIAC tills cost sharing, provides rnensberss as suite of high quality deliverables at lower cost per member as, more cities and agencies participate. Cost savings, are passed back to participants in the fon-n of additional data products,, more frequent [mage capture and maintaining the price point over time,
To date, 102 cities, County departments, agencies, and educationalinsfitutions, have benefited, from these cost savings. These entities ar listed in Attlachinient I. 'We iinvite You to contact Exhibit 4
these participants,to learn more abotut theARe and benefit from the LARIA(D.

EXHIBIT 4
Benefits
LARIAC7 PRODUCTLIST
Orthogonal Imagery,
• 4-band orthogonal imagery (including color infrared) at.4-inch or,better resolution in the urban areas, and 9-inch or better in the National Forest.. • Multiple formats (TIFF, JPEG2000, and carnpressed ECW).

Oblique Imagery
• 3-b,andco,],orobli,q,u:eliimageryat4-incliresolutilon. • Online hosted access for desktop, and nubile devices,.

Building Outlines
* Building outlines Updated for all buildings over 300 square feet.

Digital Terrain Data
• LIDAR point cloud IndlUding all elevation data (01-1 or better). • D,jgjt,al: Terrain IModel �DTNI) — bare, earth data derived fforn LIDAR.. • Digital. Surface IModel (DSM) - building and tree tops derived from LIDAR. • Digital Elevation Model (DEM),— bare earth data optimized for processing. • 1-foot contWrs for urban areas, sand 2-feet contours fear the National Forest..

Additional Data Praduct(s) as Feasible
• Additional high resolution image acquisitions throughout the three-yearcycle. • Nonnalined Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI).
• Solar Model.
• Raster Tree Ca:nopy Model.
• Raster Building data Model.
• Hlflshade.
• Slope.
• Raster Height Model.
• 3D miesb.
• Street-level iniagery, and derived products.
• Other addRibinal derived GIi data products.

Hosted Solution
• EaigleView CONNECTExplorer and CONNECT Products e.g. EagteView for ES;RI Web AppBuilder, Integrated Pictometry Application).
• Image services provided asVVPv1S, WMTS, TMS, and Es,ri REST. ,CIS Viewer Access
• Enhanced access to the LARIAC data, current parcel information, other County, GIS data, and mapping and, GIB fools through the Cotinty's GI S Viewer.

Exhibit 4 257

, pF 1Q5.,4
Jtat °„u,w`"r, *HCF
County of Los Angeles
,. INTERNAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
u rl 9150 Imperial Hwy.
cA 41FORh1�P Downey, California 90242
SELWYN HOLLINS Telephone: (323)267-2103
Director „ FAX: (323)264-7135
To enrich lives through effective and caring service
February 15, 2022
Michael B. O'Kelly
City Manager
City of Bell Gardens
Dear Michael B. O'Kelly,
LOS ANGELES REGION IMAGERY ACQUISITION CONSORTIUM (LARIAC7) Established in 2005, the Los Angeles Region Imagery Acquisition Consortium (LARIAC) has delivered highly accurate digital aerial imagery and elevation datasets to participants at substantial cost savings and has become a national model for collaborative data acquisition.

LARIAC participants have included 52 cities, 27 County departments, 16 local, state, and federal agencies, and seven educational institutions.

To ensure the currency of the aerial imagery, we are working with consortia members to plan and initiate the next LARIAC cycle - LARIAC7. This document describes LARIAC, highlights its benefits, provides a status update, and discusses the proposed scope, schedule, and cost.

Your total portion of the cost of LARIAC7 will be $25,637.

To conserve paper, we will also E-mail a digital copy of this letter and Participant Agreement to current LARIAC participants. These participants are listed on Attachment I Payments are traditionally invoiced in two equal installments in year one (Spring 2023) and two (Spring 2024) of the cycle.

LARIAC BACKGROUND
LARIAC is a consortium of the County of Los Angeles, in partnership with cities and agencies, which collaboratively acquires valuable digital aerial data, including imagery and elevation data.

Leveraging the combined buying power of the member agencies, LARIAC reduces costs, enabled participants to acquire more data than would be possible individually and provides consistent and comparable data over time.

The LARIAC Website ( https://Iariac-lacounty.hub.arcgis.com/) provides comprehensive information about the project, including detailed data descriptions and samples, product guides, documentation, and agreements.

Exhibit 5 258

LARIAC7
February 15, 2022
Page2
LARIAC7
LARIAC is in its seventh cycle (LARIAC7) of digital aerial data acquisition, scheduled to begin initial data capture in early 2023 with delivery by December 2023. Attachment II shows various LARIAC data acquisitions.

LARIAC7 will update its highly accurate orthogonal and oblique imagery with color infrared, as well as derived data including building outlines. LiDAR-based elevation data and derived products, last acquired in 2016 as part of LARIAC4, will also be included in LARIAC7. The benefits of LARIAC program and its products are listed on Attachment III.

Additional products will be finalized in the coming months. These may include additional high resolution image acquisitions throughout the three-year cycle, 3D mesh, additional derived GIS data products and/or street-level imagery and derived products. Additional details on LARIAC7 product list can be found in Attachment IV.

LARIAC7 PARTICIPATION
We look forward to your participation in LARIAC7. If your organization would like to join LARIAC7, please complete, sign, and return the attached "Letter of Intent" on your business letterhead. We recognize this Letter of Intent may be subject to final approval by your City Council or authorizing Board of Directors. We would appreciate receiving your letter of intent by April 15, 2022.

When available, please confirm your city/agency's commitment to participating in funding LARIAC7, please complete and return the attached "Participant Agreement," authorizing the County to invoice your city/agency for the initial payment, which will be one half of the total amount.

Please return either the signed "Letter of Intent" or "Participant Agreement" as a digitally signed document via email (preferred) to Steve Steinberg ssteinberg(d)-isd.lacounty gov and An Dang adang(d)-isd.lacounty gov or in hard copy by mail to
Attention: Steven Steinberg
County of Los Angeles
Internal Services Department
Mailstop #3
9150 Imperial Highway
Downey, CA 90242
Exhibit 5 259

LARIAC7
February 15, 2022

If you have any questions, please contact one of us below:

LARIAC Project Director LARIAC Project Manager
Steven Steinberg An Dang
(562) 392-7126 (562) 955-3916
ssteinberg(a)-isd.lacounty.gov adang isd.lacounty.gov Sincerely,
Steven J. Steinberg, Ph.D., MPA, GISP
Geographic Information Officer (GIO)
County of Los Angeles
Attachments (6)
Exhibit 5 260

CITY OF BELL GARDENS

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
f b .

AGENDAREPORT
Item 10.

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Michael B. O'Kelly, City Manager
BY: Hailes H. Soto, Assistant to the City Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION EXTENDING AN AMENDMENT

TO THE GROSS REVENUE LICENSE FEE IMPOSED ON PARKWEST BICYCLE CASINO
DATE: April 8, 2024
RECOMMENDATION:

It is staff's recommendation that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution extending an amendment to the gross revenue license fee imposed on Parkwest Bicycle Casino for a limited time period ending on July 31, 2024.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

Parkwest Bicycle Casino ("Bicycle Casino") is a gaming establishment that operates in the City of Bell Gardens ("City") pursuant to the Bell Gardens Municipal Code ("BGMC") Chapter 5.25 ("Gaming Ordinance") and applicable state law. On March 29, 2022, the City Council of the City of Bell Gardens adopted Resolution No. 2022-26 approving a transaction involving the sale and purchase of the gambling operations and related assets of the Bicycle Casino by Parkwest Bicycle Casino LLC ("Parkwest") and issuance of a new card club license to Parkwest.

Pursuant to BGMC Section 5.25.120, Parkwest pays the City a monthly gross revenue license fee derived from Bicycle Casino gaming operations in lieu of any other gross receipts tax imposed by the City. License fees received from the Bicycle Casino are a major source of revenues to the City's general fund and enable the City to support a variety of programs including public safety and recreation programs. Since assuming ownership in March 2022, Parkwest has enacted various changes that have improved operations and increased gaming activity at the Bicycle Casino. Beginning as of August 2022, Parkwest has invested post tax revenue to incentivize additional gaming by implementing Bonus Chip Promotion and Player Reward Points ("Incentives Program"). The Incentives Program has been mutually beneficial to the City and the Bicycle Casino because it has increased gross revenues from gaming operations, which has the effect of increasing license fee revenues for the City.

The City Council may amend, alter, increase, or decrease the prescribed gross revenue license fee by resolution pursuant to BGMC Section 5.25.120.D. On March 13, 2023, the City Council of the City of Bell Gardens adopted Resolution No. 2023-16 approving a temporary amendment to the gross revenue license fee imposed on Parkwest for the period commencing August 1, 2022, and ending December 31, 2023. On December 11, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-113 extending the temporary amendment to the gross revenue license fee through April 30, 2024.

The City and Parkwest desire to amend the City's Gaming Ordinance to codify the change to the gross revenue license fee prescribed in BGMC Section 5.25.120.A by allowing the reduction of post-tax amounts invested by an operator/license holder in an Incentives Program from monthly gross revenues used to calculate the monthly license fee. The City has conducted a review of the financial impact of the proposed reduction and has determined that the 261

amended fee would serve the City's interests by encouraging continued investments in the Bicycle Casino that will, in turn, generate greater revenues for the City.

Pursuant to the Gambling Control Act, any amendment to the City's Gaming Ordinance requires review by the State of California Bureau of Gambling Control ("Bureau").

On January 5, 2024, the City submitted the proposed changes to the Gaming Ordinance to the Bureau for review and comment pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 19961.1. On February 13, 2024, the City received a letter from the Bureau indicating that the proposed amendments appear compliant with the Gambling Control Act
To allow sufficient time for consideration by the City Council of an ordinance to codify the proposed changes, it is necessary to further extend the temporary amendment to the gross revenue license fee through July 31, 2024.

Upon adoption of an Ordinance codifying changes to the gross revenue license fee, the Resolution will have no further force and effect as of the effective date of said Ordinance.

CONCLUSION:

The City desires to support initiatives that help maintain successful business operations, strengthen the local economy and enhance the overall quality of life for City residents. The Incentives Program has been mutually beneficial to the City and Parkwest because it has increased gross revenues from gaming operations, which has the effect of increasing license fee revenues for the City.

FISCAL IMPACT:

License fee revenues have increased since August 2022 due to the Incentives Program successfully implemented at Parkwest Bicycle Casino. The cardroom gross revenue basis used for calculating license fee revenue will be reduced by an amount equal to the cost of the Incentives Program.

These programs and this reduction in cardroom gross revenue basis have resulted in a continued net increase in the City's license fee revenues. It is anticipated that these programs and this reduction in cardroom gross revenue basis will result in a continued net increase in the City's license fee revenues.

ATTACHMENTS:

Exhibit 1 - Resolution No. 2024-19
APPROVED ELECTRONICALLY BY:

Michael B. O'Kelly, City Manager
Stephanie Vasquez, City Attorney and/or Susie Altamirano, Assistant City Attorney Manuel Carrillo, Director of Finance and Administrative Services 262

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-19

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELL

GARDENS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SECOND EXTENSION TO

THE AMENDMENT TO THE GROSS REVENUE LICENSE FEE IMPOSED

ON PARKWEST BICYCLE CASINO
WHEREAS, Parkwest Bicycle Casino, formerly Bicycle Hotel & Casino, ("Bicycle Casino") is a gaming establishment that operates in the City of Bell Gardens ("City") pursuant to the Bell Gardens Municipal Code ("BGMC") Chapter 5.25 (the "Gaming Ordinance") and applicable state law; and
WHEREAS, on March 29, 2022, the City Council of the City of Bell Gardens ("City Council") adopted Resolution No. 2022-26 approving a transaction involving the sale and purchase of the gambling operations and related assets of the Bicycle Casino by Parkwest Bicycle Casino LLC ("Licensee") and issuance of a new card club license to Licensee; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to BGMC Section 5.25.120, Licensee pays the City a monthly gross revenue license fee derived from Bicycle Casino gaming operations in lieu of any other gross receipts tax imposed by the City; and WHEREAS, license fees received from the Bicycle Casino are a major source of revenues to the City's general fund and enable the City to support a variety of programs including public safety and recreation programs; and
WHEREAS, since assuming ownership in March 2022, Licensee has enacted various changes that have improved operations and increased gaming activity at the Bicycle Casino; and
WHEREAS, beginning as of August 2022, Licensee has invested post tax revenue to incentivize additional gaming by implementing Bonus Chip Promotion and Player Reward Points ("Incentives Program"); and
WHEREAS, the Incentives Program has been mutually beneficial to the City and Bicycle Casino because it has increased gross revenues from gaming operations, which has the effect of increasing net license fee revenues for the City; and WHEREAS, the City desires to support initiatives that maintain successful operations, strengthen the local economy and enhance the overall quality of life for City residents; and
WHEREAS, the City Council may amend, alter, increase, or decrease the prescribed gross revenue license fee by resolution pursuant to BGMC Section

5.25.120.D; and
Exhibit 1 263

Resolution No. 2024-19
WHEREAS, on March 13, 2023, the City Council of the City of Bell Gardens adopted Resolution No. 2023-16 approving a temporary amendment to the gross revenue license fee imposed on Licensee for the period commencing August 1, 2022, and ending December 31, 2023; and
WHEREAS, on December 11, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-113 extending the temporary amendment to the gross revenue license fee through April 30, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the City and Licensee desire to amend the City's Gaming Ordinance to codify the change to the gross revenue license fee; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Gambling Control Act, any amendment to the City's Gaming Ordinance requires review by the State of California Bureau of Gambling Control ("Bureau"); and
WHEREAS, on January 5, 2024, the City submitted the proposed changes to the Gaming Ordinance to the Bureau for review and comment pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 19961.1; and
WHEREAS, on February 13, 2024, the City received a letter from the Bureau indicating that the proposed amendments appear compliant with the Gambling Control Act; and
WHEREAS, to allow sufficient time for consideration by the City Council of an ordinance to codify the proposed changes, it is necessary to further extend the temporary amendment to the gross revenue license fee through July 31, 2024; and WHEREAS, the City has conducted a review of the financial impact of the reduction and has determined that the amended fee would serve the City's interests by encouraging continued investments in the Bicycle Casino that will, in turn, generate greater revenues for the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Bell Gardens as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council finds that the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. The City Council does hereby approve the amended monthly gross revenue fee as prescribed in BGMC Section 5.25.120.A as adopted by this Resolution to continue in effect through July 31, 2024. Upon adoption by City Council of an ordinance codifying changes to the gross revenue license fee, this Resolution shall have no further force and effect as of the effective date of said Ordinance. 2 of 4
Exhibit 1 264

Resolution No. 2024-19
SECTION 3. The City Council's approval is subject to the following conditions: all licensees shall comply with all provisions of BGMC Chapter 5.25; the California Gambling Control Act, including, but not limited to, reporting requirements, wagering limits, and number of tables; the regulations of the California Gambling Control Commission; any gambling licenses issued by the California Gambling Control Commission; and all other applicable laws governing card rooms.

SECTION 4. The City reserves the right to withdraw this approval in the event that there is any change or modification made to, or concerning the conditions of, the documents, including financial statements, submitted for consideration by the City.

SECTION 5. Except as amended by this Resolution, all fees set forth in BGMC Chapter 5.25 shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall attest and certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions, and it shall become effective immediately upon its approval.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 8t" day of April 2024.

THE CITY OF BELL GARDENS
Jorgel Chavez, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

Stephanie Vasquez Daisy Gomez
City Attorney City Clerk
[Signatures on the following page]
3of4
Exhibit 1 265

Resolution No. 2024-19
I, City Clerk of the City of Bell Gardens, hereby CERTIFY that City Council Resolution No. was adopted by the Bell Gardens City Council at a regular meeting of the City Council held on , and was approved and passed by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
4of4
Exhibit 1 266

CITY OF BELL GARDENS

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
f b .

AGENDAREPORT
Item 11.

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Michael B. O'Kelly, City Manager
BY: Bernardo I niguez, Director of Public Works/Facilities Douglas Benash, P.E., City Engineer
SUBJECT: INSTALLATION OF RED CURB "NO PARKING" RESTRICTIONS FRONTING 7533

GARFIELD AVENUE
DATE: April 8, 2024
RECOMMENDATION:

It is staff's recommendation that the City Council:

1. Adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the installation of 10 feet of additional red curb 'no parking' restrictions on the north side of the southerly driveway fronting 7533 Garfield Avenue; and

2. Rescind Resolution No. 2023-92.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

The Public Works Department received a request from a business representative of Orbit Industries for the installation of additional red curb parking restrictions on the north side of the southerly driveway fronting 7533 Garfield Avenue due to traffic safety concerns. The requestor indicated that vehicles park within the area of the driveway, impacting inbound and outbound large truck traffic on Garfield Avenue. Currently, the Garfield Avenue driveway has 10 feet of red curb on the southerly side of the driveway, with no red curb on the north side of the driveway.

In accordance with City policy, the City Engineer reviewed the request and conducted a field review of the site.

Access and sight distance issues are considered as part of the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) guidelines. Staff uses this information as a baseline when considering requests for parking restrictions due to sight distance issues from private property. Traffic engineers also perform a comprehensive assessment of the community, current community parking impacts, operations, and accident history. The City does not have any accident history at this address.

The community has an overall parking shortage and when looking at this specific case, the options are to maintain current conditions or paint 10 feet of red curb on the northside of the driveway.

On March 5, 2024, the Traffic and Safety Commission approved staff's recommendation for City Council consideration of the installation of 10 feet of additional red curb on the northside of the southerly driveway fronting 7533 Garfield Avenue.

CONCLUSION:

After a review of field conditions, the City Engineer recommends approving the request for the installation of 10 feet of additional red curb parking restrictions on the north side of the southerly driveway fronting 7533 Garfield Avenue. 267

FISCAL IMPACT:

The estimated cost for the installation of red curb is approximately $500 and is available in the current Street Maintenance Budget.

ATTACHMENTS:

Exhibit 1 - Resolution No. 2024-20
Exhibit 2 - Proposed Improvements
APPROVED ELECTRONICALLY BY:

Michael B. O'Kelly, City Manager
Stephanie Vasquez, City Attorney and/or Susie Altamirano, Assistant City Attorney Manuel Carrillo, Director of Finance and Administrative Services 268

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-20

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELL
GARDENS, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PARKING

RESTRICTIONS IN THE CITY OF BELL GARDENS IN ACCORDANCE
WITH CHAPTER 13.20 (PARKING) OF THE BELL GARDENS

MUNICIPAL CODE AND RESCINDING AND SUPERSEDING RESOLUTION NO. 2023-92
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to reaffirm and ratify and re-establish those parking restrictions presently in effect in the City of Bell Gardens as adopted by Resolution No. 2023-92; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to install an additional 10 feet of additional red curb `no parking' restrictions fronting 7533 Garfield Avenue to improve sight distance conditions as described in Section (1)(A)(176) of the Parking Restrictions which are attached and incorporated hereto as Exhibit "A."
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Bell Gardens as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council, after consideration of the staff report and presentation, discussion, oral testimony and evidence presented to the City Council, hereby finds that the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein.

SECTION 2. Resolution No. 2023-92 is hereby rescinded, repealed, replaced and superseded in its entirety by this Resolution.

SECTION 3. The City Council hereby approves the Parking Restrictions attached and incorporated hereto as Exhibit "A."
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall attest and certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions, and it shall become effective immediately upon its approval.
[Signatures on the following page]
Exhibit 1 269

Resolution No. 2024-20
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 8t" day of April, 2024.

THE CITY OF BELL GARDENS
Jorgel Chavez, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

Stephanie Vasquez Daisy Gomez
City Attorney City Clerk
2 of 29
Exhibit 1 270

Resolution No. 2024-20
I, , City Clerk of the City of Bell Gardens, hereby CERTIFY that City Council Resolution No. was adopted by the Bell Gardens City Council at a regular meeting of the City Council held on and was approved and passed by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Daisy Gomez
City Clerk
3 of 29
Exhibit 1 271

Resolution No. 2024-20
EXHIBIT "A"

PARKING RESTRICTIONS
I. The stopping, standing, or parking of a vehicle upon any of the following streets or parts thereof shall be prohibited, pursuant to Section 13.20.120 of the Bell Gardens Municipal Code, at all times or during such other hours as are set forth herein:

A. At all times (red curb).

1. The north side of Gage Avenue from a point eight hundred fifty-five (855) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb of Garfield Avenue to a point two hundred (200) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb of Darwell Avenue;

2. The south side of Gage Avenue from a point five hundred seventy-five (575) feet west of the prolongation of the east curb of Garfield Avenue to the prolongation of the east curb of Ira Avenue;

3. On the north and south sides of Gage Avenue from Specht Avenue to Eastern Avenue;

4. On the north and south sides of Gage Avenue from the prolongation of the easterly curb of Eastern Avenue to a point two hundred (200) feet easterly thereof;

5. On the north and south sides of Gage Avenue from a point two hundred (200) feet west of the prolongation of the westerly curb of Colmar Avenue to a point two hundred (200)feet east of the prolongation of the easterly curb of Colmar Avenue;

6. On the north and south sides of Gage Avenue from a point two hundred (200) feet west of the prolongation of the westerly curb of Jaboneria Road to a point two hundred (200)feet east of the prolongation of the easterly curb of Jaboneria Road;

7. The east side of Darwell Avenue from the prolongation of the northerly curb of Florence Avenue to a point six hundred twenty (620) feet north of the prolongation of the northerly curb of Loveland Avenue;

8. The west side of Marlow Avenue from the driveway at 5560 Ludell Street to a point two hundred fifty (250) feet northerly thereof;

9. The north side of Florence Avenue from the prolongation of the east curb line of Ira Avenue to a point two hundred thirty-five (235) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Toler Avenue;

10. The north side of Shull from the prolongation of the easterly curb of Garfield Avenue to a point one hundred sixty-five (165) feet easterly thereof;

11. The south side of Suva Street between Loveland Street and Emil Avenue; 4 of 29
Exhibit 1 272

Resolution No. 2024-20

12. The west side of Bell Gardens Avenue from the prolongation of the southerly curb of Quinn Street to a point six hundred (600) feet north of the prolongation of the northerly curb of Gotham Street;

13. The south side of Gage Avenue from a point two hundred fifty (250) feet west of the prolongation of the westerly curb of Chalet Drive to a point two hundred seventy (270) feet east of the prolongation of the easterly curb of Chalet Drive;

14. The south side of Clara Street between the west City limits and the south Clara Street service road;

15. The north side of Clara Street from the west City limits to the north Clara Street service road;

16. The north and south side of Loveland Street from the prolongation of the west curb on Garfield Avenue to a point two hundred fifteen (215) feet westerly thereof;

17. The south side of Florence Avenue from the prolongation of the west curb of Priam Drive to a point sixty-three (63) feet westerly thereof;

18. The north side of Gage Avenue from two hundred seventy (270) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Emil Avenue to a point nine hundred sixty (960) feet westerly thereof;

19. The red curb would begin on the north side of Agra Street from a point four hundred (400) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Jaboneria Road to a point four hundred fifty (450) feet westerly thereof;

20. The south side of Gage Avenue from a point four hundred (400) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb of Perry Road to a point four hundred sixty (460) feet easterly thereof;

21. The south side of Quinn Street from the prolongation of the west curb of Jaboneria Road to a point one hundred (100) feet westerly thereof;

22. The north and south sides of Gage Avenue from the west City limits to the service roads;

23. The east and west sides of Scout Avenue from the prolongation of the north curb of Florence Avenue to a point two hundred fifty (250) feet northerly thereof;

24. The north side of Florence Avenue from a point three hundred (300) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Scout Avenue to the east City limits;

25. The west side of Jaboneria Road from the prolongation of the north curb of Gage Avenue to a point two hundred (200) feet northerly thereof; 5 of 29
Exhibit 1 273

Resolution No. 2024-20

26. The east side of Jaboneria Road from the prolongation of the north curb of Gag Avenue to a point fifty (50) feet northerly thereof;

27. The east and west sides of Jaboneria Road from the prolongation of the south curb of Gage Avenue to a point two hundred (200) feet southerly thereof;

28. The east side of Eastern Avenue from the prolongation of the north curb line of Florence Avenue to a point five hundred forty-five (545) feet northerly thereof;

29. The east side of Eastern Avenue from the prolongation of the south curb line of Florence Avenue to a point two hundred (200) feet southerly thereof;

30. The north side of Florence Avenue from the prolongation of the east curb line of Eastern Avenue to a point one hundred ninety-five (195) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Ajax Avenue;

31. The north and south sides of Florence Avenue from the prolongation of the west curb line of Eastern Avenue to the west City limits;

32. The north side of Suva Street from a point six hundred ninety-four (694) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Emil Avenue to a point seven hundred six (706) feet easterly thereof;

33. The west side of Ira Avenue from the prolongation of the southerly curb line of Clara Street to the westerly curb line of Garfield Avenue;

34. The east side of Eastern Avenue from the prolongation of the northerly curb line of Watcher Street to the northerly City limits;

35. The south side of Florence Avenue from the prolongation of the east curb line of Eastern Avenue to a point one hundred seven (107) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of El Selinda Avenue;

36. The north side of Agra Street from a point four hundred (400) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Jaboneria Road to a point six hundred (600) feet westerly thereof;

37. The east side of Garfield Avenue from a point one hundred ninety (190) feet south of the prolongation of the south curb of Cecilia Avenue to a point two hundred ten (210) feet southerly thereof;

38. The north side of Clara Street from a point 175' west of the western prolongation of Kress Street to a point 200' westerly thereof;
6 of 29
Exhibit 1 274

Resolution No. 2024-20

39. The south side of Suva Street from a point six hundred fifty-five (655) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Emil Avenue to a point seven hundred thirty-five (735) feet easterly thereof;

40. The west side of Garfield Avenue from the prolongation of the easterly curb line of Eastern Avenue to a point one hundred twenty (120) feet northerly thereof;

41. The south side of Clara Street from a point one hundred seventy-two (172) feet east of the prolongation of the easterly curb of Garfield Avenue to a point three hundred twenty (320) feet easterly thereof;

42. The south side of Florence Avenue from a point one hundred seventy (170) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Jaboneria Road to a point seventy (70) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Jaboneria Road;

43. The south side of Florence Avenue from a point fifty (50) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Ira Avenue to a point forty (40) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Ira Avenue;

44. The south side of Florence Avenue from a point two hundred sixty-five (265) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Ira Avenue to a point three hundred ninety (390) feet easterly thereof;

45. The south side of Florence Avenue from a point two hundred ten (210) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Toler Avenue to a point seventy-five (75) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Toler Avenue;

46. The south side of Florence Avenue from a point one hundred forty-five (145) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Garfield Avenue to a point three hundred thirty-five (335) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Garfield Avenue;

47. The south side of Florence Avenue from a point one hundred thirty (130) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Perry Road to a point forty (40)feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Perry Road;

48. The south side of Florence Avenue from a point sixty-five (65) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Kress Avenue to a point seventy (70) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Kress Avenue;

49. The south side of Florence Avenue from a point one hundred twenty-five (125)feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Emil Avenue to a point one hundred sixty-three (163) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Emil Avenue; 7 of 29
Exhibit 1 275

Resolution No. 2024-20

50. The north side of Florence Avenue from a point sixty-two (62) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of El Selinda Avenue to a point one hundred thirty (130) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of El Selinda Avenue;

51. The north side of Florence Avenue from a point one hundred sixty-five (165) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Jaboneria Road to a point seventy (70) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Jaboneria Road;

52. The north side of Florence Avenue from the prolongation of the west curb line of Ira Avenue to a point sixty-five (65) feet westerly thereof;

53. The west side of Eastern Avenue from the prolongation of the south curb line of Lubec Street to the prolongation of the north curb line of Priory Street;

54. The north side of Florence Avenue from the prolongation of the east curb line of Granger Avenue to a point sixty-five (65) feet easterly thereof;

55. The north side of Florence Avenue from a point sixty-three (63) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Perry Road to a point one hundred fifty (150) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Perry Road;

56. The north side of Florence Avenue from a point fifty-seven (57) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Emil Avenue to a point one hundred ninety-five (195) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Emil Avenue;

57. The north side of Florence Place from a point two hundred thirty (230) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Toler Avenue to a point fifty-five (55) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Toler Avenue;

58. The east side of Eastern Avenue from the prolongation of the south curb line of Fry Street to the prolongation of the north curb line of Live Oak Street;

59. The north side of Live Oak Street from the prolongation of the east curb line of Eastern Avenue to a point one hundred fifty (150) feet easterly thereof;

60. The north side of Fry Street from the prolongation of the east curb line of Eastern Avenue easterly to the school property;

61. The north side of Priory Street from the prolongation of the west curb line of Eastern Avenue westerly to the west City limits;

62. The south side of Priory Street from the prolongation of the west curb line of Eastern Avenue to a point one hundred fifty (150) feet westerly thereof;

63. The west side of Darwell Avenue from the prolongation of the south curb line of Gage Avenue to a point one hundred eighty (180) feet southerly thereof; 8 of 29
Exhibit 1 276

Resolution No. 2024-20

64. The south side of Scout Avenue from a point thirty (30) feet west of the west property line of 7800 Scout Avenue easterly to a point fifty (50) feet;

65. The south side of Scout Avenue from the east property line of 7800 Scout Avenue westerly to a point thirty (30) feet;

66. The north side of Florence Place from the prolongation of the east curb of Garfield Avenue to a point two hundred thirty (230) feet easterly thereof;

67. The south side of Lubec Street from the prolongation of the west curb of Eastern Avenue to a point one hundred ninety-five (195) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb of Marlow Avenue;

68. The south side of Quinn Avenue from Lynda Lane to a point twenty-five (25) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb of Lynda Lane;

69. The east side of Eastern Avenue between the points six hundred sixty-five (665) feet and seven hundred twenty-five (725)feet north of the prolongation of the north curb of Florence Avenue;

70. The east side of Garfield Avenue from a point three hundred twenty-five (325) feet south of the prolongation of the south curb line of Loveland Street to a point five hundred thirty-five (535) feet southerly thereof;

71. The east side of Eastern Avenue from the prolongation of the south curb of Gage Avenue to a point two hundred thirty (230) feet southerly thereof;

72. The north and south sides of Clara Street from the prolongation of the west curb of Eastern Avenue to a point three hundred fifty (350) feet westerly thereof;

73. The north and south sides of Clara Street from the prolongation of the east curb of Eastern Avenue to a point two hundred fifty-five (255) feet easterly thereof;

74. The west side of Scout Avenue from the prolongation of the south curb of Florence Avenue to the prolongation of the east curb of Priam Drive;

75. The east side of Scout Avenue from the prolongation of the south curb of Florence Avenue to a point one hundred (100) feet south of the prolongation of the south curb of Clara Street;

76. The south side of Hannon Street from a point six hundred (600) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb of Chalet Drive to a point six hundred seventy-five (675) feet southerly thereof;
9 of 29
Exhibit 1 277

Resolution No. 2024-20

77. The north side of Hannon Street from a point six hundred twenty-five (625) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb of Chalet Drive to a point seven hundred seventy-five (775) feet southerly thereof;

78. The west side of Perry Road from the prolongation of the south curb of Florence Avenue to a point three hundred five (305) feet southerly thereof;

79. The east side of Perry Road from the prolongation of the south curb of Florence Avenue to a point one hundred (100) feet southerly thereof;

80. The east side of Colmar Avenue from the prolongation of the south curb of Gage Avenue to a point fifty-five (55) feet southerly thereof;

81. The west side of Perry Road from the prolongation of the north curb of Florence Avenue to the alley northerly thereof;

82. The east side of Greenwood Avenue from the prolongation of the south curb of Gage Avenue to a point one hundred five (105) feet southerly thereof;

83. The west side of Greenwood Avenue from the prolongation of the south curb of Gage Avenue to a point fifty (50) feet southerly thereof;

84. The north side of Gage Avenue from the prolongation of the west curb of Greenwood Avenue to a point one hundred five (105) feet westerly thereof;

85. The west side of Emil Avenue from the prolongation of the south curb of Gage Avenue to a point forty (40) feet southerly thereof;

86. The east side of Emil Avenue from the prolongation of the south curb of Gage Avenue to a point one hundred fifty (150) feet southerly thereof;

87. The east side of Darwell Avenue from the prolongation of the south curb of Gage Avenue to a point seventy (70) feet southerly thereof;

88. The east side and west side of Darwell Avenue from the prolongation of the north curb of Gage Avenue to a point sixty (60) feet northerly thereof;

89. The west side of Colmar Avenue from the prolongation of the north curb of Gage Avenue to a point seventy-five (75) feet northerly thereof;

90. The south side of Gage Avenue from the prolongation of the west curb of Greenwood Avenue to a point two hundred five (205) feet westerly thereof;

91. The north side of Gage Avenue from a point two hundred eighty-five (285)feet east of the prolongation of the east curb of Chalet Drive to a point three hundred twenty- five (325) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb of Chalet Drive; 10 of 29
Exhibit 1 278

Resolution No. 2024-20

92. The east side of Chalet Drive from the prolongation of the south curb of Gage Avenue to a point one hundred forty (140) feet southerly thereof;

93. The north side of Gage Avenue from a point two hundred forty-five (245) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb of Emil Avenue to a point two hundred thirty-five (235) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb of Emil Avenue;

94. The south side of Gage Avenue from a point one hundred sixty (160) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb of Emil Avenue to a point two hundred thirty-five (235) feet west of the prolongation of the east curb of Emil Avenue;

95. The west side of Garfield Avenue from the prolongation of the south curb of Loveland Street to a point two hundred fifty (250) feet southerly thereof;

96. The east side of Garfield Avenue from a point four hundred (400) feet north of the prolongation of the north curb of Clara Street to a point six hundred sixty-five (665) feet northerly thereof;

97. The west side of Jaboneria Road from the prolongation of the north curb of Clara Street to a point one hundred seventy (170) feet northerly thereof;

98. The east side of Jaboneria Road from the prolongation of the south curb of Clara Street to a point one hundred seventy-six (176) feet southerly thereof;

99. The south side of Clara Street from the prolongation of the west curb of Jaboneria Road to a point one hundred seventy-seven (177) feet westerly thereof; 100. The north side of Clara Street from the prolongation of the east curb of Jaboneria Road to a point one hundred thirty (130) feet easterly thereof; 101. The west side of Emil Avenue from a point two hundred seventy (270) feet south of the prolongation of the south curb of Florence Avenue to a point two hundred ninety (290) feet southerly thereof;
102. The south side of Shull Street from a point eight hundred eighty-nine (889) feet east of the BCR at Jaboneria Road, twenty-five (25) feet east and west of the back driveway at 5700 Shull Street;
103. The north side of Clara Street from a point one hundred forty-five (145) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb of Ira Avenue to a point one hundred sixty (160) feet westerly thereof;
104. The north side of Clara Street from a point one hundred ninety (190) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb of Ira Avenue to a point two hundred five (205) feet westerly thereof;
11 of 29
Exhibit 1 279

Resolution No. 2024-20
105. The north side of Clara Street from a point four hundred (400) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb of Ira Avenue to a point four hundred fifteen (415) feet westerly thereof;
106. The north side of Clara Street from a point four hundred forty-five (445) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb of Ira Avenue to a point four hundred sixty (460) feet westerly thereof;
107. The north side of Watcher Street from a point eighty (80) feet east of the west curb of Jaboneria Road to a point ninety (90) feet south of the north curb of Watcher Street on the west side of Jaboneria Road;
108. The east side of Colmar Street from a point fifty (50) feet north of the prolongation of the north curb line of Lanto Street to a point one hundred fifty-five (155) feet northerly, thereof;
109. The east side of Emil Avenue south of Clara Street at alley entrance from the BCR on the north side of alley to a point twenty (20) feet northward on the east side of Emil Avenue; and from the BCR on the south side of alley to a point twenty (20) feet southward on the east side of Emil Avenue;
110. The west side of Emil Avenue south of Clara Street from the BCR on the north side of alley to a point twenty (20) feet northward on the west side of Emil Avenue; 111. The south side of Florence Avenue from a point one hundred forty (140) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Ira Avenue to a point one hundred sixty- eight (168) feet westerly thereof;
112. The west side of Garfield Avenue from a point twenty-five (25) feet south of the southern prolongation of Loveland Street to a point four hundred twenty-five (425) feet southerly, thereof;
113. The west side of Garfield Avenue from a point five hundred fifty (550)feet south of the southern prolongation of Loveland Street to a point seven hundred nineteen (719) feet southerly, thereof;
114. The north side of the southern Clara Street service road from the west City limits cul-de-sac to a point two hundred eighty-five (285) feet easterly thereof; 115. The west side of Ajax Avenue from the prolongation of the southern curb line of Lubec Street, to a point five hundred sixty-two (562) feet southerly thereof; 12 of 29
Exhibit 1 280

Resolution No. 2024-20
116. The south side of Ludell Street from a point of (12) feet west of the prolongation of the western curbline of El Selinda, to a point one hundred four feet (104) westerly thereof;
117. The south side of Gage from a point four hundred twenty-three (423) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Garfield Avenue to a point five hundred twenty three feet easterly thereof;
118. The south side of Park Lane, from a point four hundred twenty-three (423)feet east of the eastern prolongation of the east side of Garfield Avenue, to a point five hundred twenty-three (523) feet easterly thereof;
119. The southside of Priory Street, twenty-one (21') feet west of the western prolongation to a point of six hundred fifty-eight (658') westerly thereof; 120. The north side of Agra Street, from a point four hundred eighty seven (487) feet from the east prolongation of Colmar Street to a point six hundred and one (601) feet easterly thereof. For a total of one hundred and fourteen (114) feet; 121. The north side of Lubec Street from a point fourteen (14) feet east of the eastern prolongation of Specht Avenue to a point one hundred forty-three (143) feet easterly thereof;
122. The north side of Foster Bridge Blvd from a point twenty-five (25) feet west of the western prolongation of Priam Drive to a point fifty-five (55) feet westerly thereof; 123. The north side of Foster Bridge Blvd from a point one hundred ninety-three (193) feet west of the western prolongation of Cassandra Avenue to a point two hundred forty-one (241) feet westerly thereof;
124. The east side of Emil Avenue from a point twenty-six (26) feet of the southern prolongation of Otto Street to a point fifty-six (56) feet southerly thereof; 125. The east side of Priam Drive from a point ten (10) feet north of the northern prolongation of Foster Bridge Blvd to a point forty (40) feet northerly thereof; 126. The west side of Priam Drive from a point fifteen (15) feet north of prolongation of Foster Bridge Blvd to a point thirty (30) feet northerly thereof; 127. The east side of Garfield Avenue from a point ten (10) feet south of the southern prolongation of Gallant Street to a point forty-one (41) feet southerly thereof; 128. The south side Gotham Street (at 5648 Gotham Street) from a point fifteen (15) feet south of the west of the western prolongation of the alley to a point fifty (50) feet westerly thereof;
13 of 29
Exhibit 1 281

Resolution No. 2024-20
129. The east side of Scout Avenue from a point five hundred twenty-two (522) feet north of the northerly prolongation of Florence Avenue to a point five hundred sixty- two (562) feet northerly thereof;
130. The east side of Scout Avenue from a point six hundred and eight (608) feet north of the northerly prolongation of Florence Avenue to a point six hundred forty-eight (648) feet northerly thereof;
131. The west side of Scout Avenue from a point five hundred and sixty (560)feet south of the southern prolongation of Live Oak Street to a point of six hundred (600) feet southerly thereof;
132. The west side of Scout Avenue from a point six hundred thirty (630) feet south of the southern prolongation of Live Oak Street to a point of six hundred fifty (650) feet southerly thereof;
133. The west side of Scout Avenue from a point seven hundred twenty-five (725) feet south of the southern prolongation of Live Oak Street to a point seven hundred sixty-five (765) feet southerly thereof;
134. The west side of Scout Avenue from a point eight hundred (800) feet south of the southern prolongation of Live Oak Street to a point eight hundred twenty (820)feet southerly thereof;
135. The south side of Foster Bridge Blvd from a point seven hundred and seventy- seven (777)feet west of the western prolongation of Scout Avenue to a point seven hundred and ninety four (794) feet westerly thereof;
136. The south side of Foster Bridge Blvd from a point eight hundred forty-six (846) feet west of the western prolongation of Scout Avenue to a point eight hundred sixty- nine (869) feet westerly thereof;
137. On the north side of Lubec Street from a point thirteen (13)feet east of the eastern prolongation of El Cortez Avenue, to a point fifty-three (53) feet easterly thereof; 138. On the north side of Suva Street from a point nine-hundred and seven (907) feet west of the west prolongation of Scout Avenue to a point forty (40) feet westerly thereof;
139. On the north side of Florence Place from a point two hundred and fifty-one (251) feet west of the west prolongation of Garfield Avenue to a point fifty-seven (57) feet westerly thereof;
140. On the north side of Agra Street from a point six hundred one (601) feet west of the westerly prolongation of Jaboneria Road to a point six hundred thirty (630)feet westerly thereof;
14 of 29
Exhibit 1 282

Resolution No. 2024-20
141. On the north side of Watcher Street from the east prolongation of Eastern Avenue to a point one hundred twenty-seven (127) feet thereof; 142. On the south side of Watcher Street from a pointy thirty-five (35) feet from the easterly prolongation of Eastern Avenue to a point one-hundred twenty (120) feet easterly thereof;
143. On the south side of Loveland Street from the western prolongation of Adamson Avenue to a point thirty-three (33) feet westerly thereof; 144. The west side of Jaboneria Road from a point two hundred eighty seven feet south of the prolongation of the south curb line of Clara Street to a point three hundred twenty-eight (328) feet southerly thereof;
145. The north side of Live Oak Street a point ninety-nine (99) feet west of the ending curb radius of Purdy Avenue to a point one hundred twenty-nine (129)feet westerly thereof;
146. The north side of Live Oak Street from a point two hundred twenty-nine (229) feet west of the ending curb radius of Purdy Avenue to a point two hundred fifty-nine (259) feet westerly thereof;
147. The north side of Live Oak Street from a point three hundred seventy-one (371) feet west of the ending radius of Purdy Avenue to a point four hundred seventy- one (471) feet westerly thereof;
148. The north side of Lubec Street from the prolongation of the west curb of Purdy Avenue to a point ten (10) feet westerly thereof;
149. The south side of Lubec Street from the prolongation of the west curb of Purdy Avenue to a point ten (10) feet westerly thereof;
150. The south side of Lubec Street from the prolongation of the east curb of Purdy Avenue to a point ten (10) feet easterly thereof;
151. The north side of Lubec Street from the prolongation of the east curb of Purdy Avenue to a point ten (10) feet easterly thereof;
152. The east side of Purdy Avenue from the prolongation of the north curb of Lubec Street to a point ten (10) feet northerly thereof;
153. The west side of Purdy Avenue from the prolongation of the south curb of Lubec Street to a point ten (10) feet southerly thereof;
154. The east side of Purdy Avenue from the prolongation of the south curb of Lubec Street to a point ten (10) feet southerly thereof;
15 of 29
Exhibit 1 283

Resolution No. 2024-20
155. The west side of Emil Avenue from a point five hundred thirty-five (535') feet south of the prolongation of the south curb of Florence Avenue to a point five hundred sixty (560) feet southerly thereof;
156. The west side of Ira Avenue from a point three hundred seventy-one (371) feet south of the prolongation of the south curb of Live Oak Street to a point three hundred ninety-one (391) feet southerly thereof;
157. The west side of Ira Avenue from a point twenty (20) feet south of the prolongation of the south curb of Priory Street to a point forty (40) feet southerly thereof; 158. The west side of Garfield Avenue from a point four hundred eight (408) feet south of the prolongation of south curb on Ira Avenue to a point four hundred sixty (460) feet southerly thereof;
159. The east side of Garfield Avenue from a point four hundred thirty-six (436) feet north of the prolongation of the north curb of Muller Street to a point four hundred seventy-one (471) feet northerly thereof;
160. The west side of Jaboneria Road from a point seven hundred twenty six (726')feet south of the prolongation of the south curb of Lubec Street to a point seven hundred sixty six (766') feet southerly thereof;
161. The south side of Florence Avenue from the prolongation of the east curb line of Jaboneria Road to a point two hundred thirteen (213) feet easterly thereof; 162. On the east side of Eastern Avenue from a point three hundred fifty-two (352) feet north of the prolongation of the north curb line of Lubec Street to a point three hundred sixty-two (362) feet northerly thereof;
163. On the east side of Emil Avenue from a point two hundred and seventy-four (274) feet north of the prolongation of the north curb line of Suva Street to a point two hundred eighty-four (284) feet northerly thereof;
164. On the west side of Emil Avenue from a point two hundred and eighty-four (284) feet south of the prolongation of the south curb line of Foster Bridge Blvd to a point two hundred and ninety-four (294) feet southerly thereof; 165. The south side of Florence Place from a point nine hundred thirty four (934) feet east of the prolongation of the west curb line of Sudan Ave. to a point nine hundred sixty-six (966) feet easterly thereof;
166. The north side of Gotham Street from a point one thousand two hundred twenty- seven (1 227) feet west of the west prolongation of Gephart Avenue to a point one thousand two hundred forty seven (1 247) feet westerly thereof; 16 of 29
Exhibit 1 284

Resolution No. 2024-20
167. The east side of Jaboneria Road from a point five hundred thirty-two (532) feet from the east prolongation of Eastern Avenue to a point five hundred eighty-three (583) feet northerly thereof;
168. The east side of Jaboneria Road from a point fifteen (15) feet from the north prolongation of Gotham Street to a point seventy-five (75) feet northerly thereof; 169. The north side of Florence Place from a point five hundred-thirty (530) feet from the prolongation of the west curb line of Garfield Avenue to a point five hundred- fifty (550) feet westerly thereof;
170. The east side of Garfield Avenue from a point six hundred forty-four(644)feet from the prolongation of the north curb line of Eastern Avenue to a point six hundred sixty-nine (669) feet northerly thereof;
171. The west side of Eastern Avenue from a point four hundred and fifty(450)feet from the prolongation of the south curb line of Live Oak Street to a point five hundred feet southerly thereof;
172. The east side of Eastern Avenue from a point two hundred and ninety feet from the prolongation of the north curb line of Clara Street to a point three hundred thirty (330) feet northly thereof;
173. The east side of Eastern Avenue from a point thirty (30) feet from the prolongation of the north curb line of Priory Street to a point fifty (50) feet northerly thereof; 174. The east side of Jaboneria Road (6021 Florence Avenue)from a point one hundred fifty feet from the prolongation of the north curb line of Florence Avenue to a point one hundred fifty-seven (157) feet northerly thereof; and 175. The south side of Gage Avenue from a point four hundred sixty-three (463) feet from the prolongation of the east curb line of Chalet Drive to a point four hundred seventy-four (474) feet easterly thereof.
176. The west side of Garfield Avenue from a point one thousand one hundred forty- three (1 143) feet from the prolongation of the south curb line of Florence Avenue to a point one thousand one hundred fifty-three (1 153) feet southerly thereof.

B. Designated Hours:

1. The south side of Clara Street from the south Clara service road and a point three hundred fifty (350) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb of Eastern Avenue, between the hours of 3.00 p.m. and 6.00 p.m., Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays excepted;

2. The south side of Clara Street, from a point three hundred fifty (350) feet east of 17 of 29
Exhibit 1 285

Resolution No. 2024-20
the prolongation of the east curb of Eastern Avenue to a point two hundred (200) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb of Jaboneria Road, between the hours of 3:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m., Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays excepted and excluding the no stopping anytime areas;

3. The north side of Clara Street, from a point two hundred fifty-five (255) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb of Eastern Avenue to a point three hundred (300) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb of Jaboneria Road, between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:30 a.m., Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays excepted and excluding the no stopping anytime areas;

4. The south side of Florence Avenue from a point one hundred twenty-five (125)feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Priam Drive to a point one hundred seven (107)feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of El Selinda Avenue, between the hours of 3:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m., Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays excepted and excluding the no stopping any time areas;

5. The north side of Florence Avenue from a point one hundred ninety-five (195) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Ajax Avenue to a point one hundred (100) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Garfield Avenue, between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m., Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays excepted and excluding the no stopping any time areas; and

6. The north side of Florence Avenue from a point ninety (90) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Garfield Avenue to a point three hundred (300) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Scout Avenue, between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m., Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays excepted and excluding the no stopping any time areas.

II. The stopping, standing, or parking of a vehicle upon any of the following streets or parts thereof for a period of time in excess of the time hereafter set forth, shall be prohibited pursuant to Section 13.20.110 of the Bell Gardens Municipal Code, at all times or during such other hours as are set forth herein unless such vehicle displays a parking permit authorized on the streets listed under Section 2A (4-9):

A. Two-hour parking - 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays excepted

1. The east side of Garfield Avenue from Florence Place to the northerly City limits and the west side of Garfield Avenue from a point five hundred seventy (570) feet south of the southern prolongation of Gage Avenue to the northern curb line of Florence Place;

2. The south side of Gage Avenue from a point two hundred (200) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb of Eastern Avenue to Ajax Avenue; 18 of 29
Exhibit 1 286

Resolution No. 2024-20

3. The west side of Garfield Avenue from a point twenty-three (23) feet north of the driveway of the Garfield Elementary School to a point one hundred eighty (180) feet south;

4. The south side of Agra Street from Colmar Avenue to Darwell Avenue (permit parking allowed);

5. The north side of Agra Street from Jaboneria Road to Darwell Avenue (permit parking allowed);

6. The east side of Jaboneria Road from Agra Street to Watcher Street (permit parking allowed);

7. The east and west sides of Jaboneria Road from Agra Street to the alley one hundred forty (140) feet south of Agra Street (permit parking allowed);

8. The north and south sides of Watcher Street from Jaboneria Road to Darwell Avenue (permit parking allowed);

9. The north and south sides of Lanto Street from Jaboneria Road to Darwell Avenue (permit parking allowed);

10. The north side of Suva Street from Emil Avenue to the east City limits;

11. The south side of Suva Street from the east property line of Suva Elementary School to the east City limits;

12. The north side of Quinn Street between Jaboneria Road and Lynda Lane;

13. The east side of Jaboneria Road between Quinn Street and Muller Street;

14. The east and west sides of Emil Avenue between Florence Place and Suva Intermediate School;

15. The east side of Garfield Avenue between the points three hundred (300) feet and four hundred (400)feet north of the northerly prolongation of the north curb of Clara Street;

16. The south side of Florence Place from Garfield Avenue to Florence Avenue;

17. The east side of Scout Avenue between the points two hundred fifty (250) feet and eight hundred forty (840)feet north of the prolongation of the north curb of Florence Avenue;

18. The west side of Eastern Avenue adjacent to the premises at 8029 Eastern Avenue (approximately one hundred fifty (150) feet);
19 of 29
Exhibit 1 287

Resolution No. 2024-20

19. The west side of Eastern Avenue from the prolongation of the north curb line of Lubec Street to the northerly City limits;

20. The east side of Eastern Avenue from a point seven hundred twenty-five (725)feet north of the prolongation of the north curb line of Florence Avenue to the prolongation of the south curb line of Watcher Street;

21. The north side of Live Oak Street from a point one hundred fifty (150) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Eastern Avenue easterly to the school property;

22. The east side of Eastern Avenue between the points five hundred forty-five (545) feet and six hundred twenty-five (625) feet north of the prolongation of the north curb of Florence Avenue;

23. The west side of Garfield Avenue from the prolongation of the north curb of Shull Street to a point two hundred ten (210) feet northerly thereof;

24. The west side of Garfield Avenue from the prolongation of the south curb of Clara Street to a point two hundred five (205) feet southerly thereof;

25. The east and west sides of Eastern Avenue from the prolongation of the south sides of Clara Street to the prolongation of the north sides of Shull Street;

26. The north side of Cecilia Street from a point sixth (60) feet east of the Eastern prolongation of Eastern Avenue to a point one hundred sixty (160) feet easterly thereof; and

27. On the north side of Agra Street from a point four hundred forty (440') feet west of the west prolongation of Jaboneria Road to a point four hundred eighty one (481') feet westerly thereof.

B. Two-hour parking 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays excepted:

1. The north side of Florence Avenue from a point one hundred ninety-five (195) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Ajax Avenue to a point one hundred (100) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Garfield Avenue, excluding the no stopping any time areas.

C. Two-hour parking 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays excepted:

1. The south side of Florence Avenue from a point one hundred twenty-five (125)feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Priam Drive to a point one hundred 20 of 29
Exhibit 1 288

Resolution No. 2024-20
seven (107)feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of El Selinda Avenue, excluding the no stopping any time areas.

D. Two-hour parking 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays excepted:

1. The north side of Florence Avenue from a point ninety (90) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Garfield Avenue to a point three hundred (300) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Scout Avenue, excluding the no stopping any time areas.

E. Two-hour parking at all times:

1. The east and west sides of Greenwood Avenue, south of Gage Avenue at all hours, excluding the no stopping any time areas.

F. One-hour parking 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Sunday excepted:

1. The east side of Eastern Avenue from the prolongation of the north curb line of Clara Street to the prolongation of the south curb line of Live Oak Street;

2. The west side of El Selinda Avenue from the prolongation of the north curb line of Florence Avenue northerly to the alley;

3. The east side of Eastern Avenue from a point two hundred (200) feet south of the prolongation of the south curb line of Florence Avenue to the prolongation of the north curb line of Fry Street;

4. The west side of Eastern Avenue from the prolongation of the south curb line of Priory Street to the prolongation of the north curb line of Clara Street; and

5. Request for one-hour limit parking zone for east side of Ira Avenue, north of Florence Avenue (El Tapatio Market).

III. The stopping, standing, or parking of a vehicle upon municipal parking lots shall be restricted, pursuant to Section 13.20.500 of the Bell Gardens Municipal Code, as follows:

A. The municipal parking lots adjacent to the Bell Gardens City Hall; parking only for the purpose of conducting business at City Hall.

B. The municipal parking lots adjacent to Ross Auditorium, Bell Gardens Park, and Ford Park; parking only for the purpose of conducting business at, or use of, the Auditorium or Park facilities, and no parking shall be permitted between the hours of 2.00 a.m. and 4.00 a.m.
21 of 29
Exhibit 1 289

Resolution No. 2024-20
C. The municipal parking lot at Ford Park adjacent to the golf course in designated spaces with signs and or marking; parking only for conducting business at, or use at, Ford Park Gold Course during the posted hours of operation.

IV. The stopping, standing, or parking of a vehicle upon any of the streets or parts thereof in the areas of the City hereinafter designated shall be prohibited pursuant to Section

13.20.120 of the Bell Gardens Municipal Code on the days designated between the hours of 8.00 a.m. and 4.00 p.m., for street sweeping purposes, provided, however, that nothing contained herein shall be effective with respect to any commercial vehicle making pickups or deliveries of goods, wares or merchandise from or to any building or structure located on the restricted street or highway, or for the purpose of delivering materials to be used in the repair, alteration, remodeling, or reconstruction of any building or structure for which a building permit has previously been obtained.

A. Each Wednesday, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.:

1. All streets and highways and portions thereof, in that section of the City of Bell Gardens lying northerly of the centerline of Florence Avenue to the north City limits.

B. Each Thursday, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.:

1. All streets and highways and portions thereof, in that section of the City of Bell Gardens lying southerly of the centerline of Florence Avenue to the north City limits.

C. Each Friday, between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m.:

1. The east side of Eastern Avenue from north City limit to south City limit.

D. Each Monday, between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m.:

1. The west side of Eastern Avenue from north City limit to south City limit.

E. The following streets or portions thereof are excepted from the prohibitions contained in this Section 4:

1. Both sides of Florence Avenue;

2. Both sides of Eastern Avenue;

3. Both sides of Scout Avenue from Florence Avenue to the prolongation of the southerly curb of Live Oak Street; and

4. The south side of Live Oak Street from the prolongation of the westerly curb of Scout Avenue to a point five hundred sixty (560) feet westerly thereof. 22 of 29
Exhibit 1 290

Resolution No. 2024-20
V. The stopping, standing, or parking of a vehicle upon any of the following streets or parts thereof shall be prohibited or restricted at all times as set forth in Section 13.20.100 of the Bell Gardens Municipal Code, by means of painted curb markings:

A. Commercial loading and unloading (yellow curb)

1. The north side of Cecilia Street from a point twenty-five (25) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Eastern Avenue, to a point one hundred two (102) feet westerly thereof;

2. The south side of Quinn Street from a point three hundred forty-five (345)feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Jaboneria Road to a point three hundred eighty-five (385) feet westerly thereof;

3. The west side of Ajax Avenue from a point two hundred (200) feet north of the prolongation of the north curb line of Florence Avenue to a point six hundred seventy-three (673) feet northerly thereof;

4. The south side of Scout Avenue from a point one hundred ninety (190) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb of Emil Avenue to a point two hundred fifty (250) feet easterly thereof;

5. The west side of Ira Street from a point one hundred fifty (150) feet north of the prolongation of the north curb line of Florence Avenue to a point two hundred fifty- five (255) feet northerly thereof;

6. The west side of Ira Avenue from a point sixty nine (69) feet south of the prolongation of the south curb of Gage Avenue to a pointy ninety one (91) feet southerly thereof to be in effect from 8:00am to 6:OOpm except Saturdays, Sundays and Holidays; and

7. The west side of Garfield (8327 Garfield Avenue) from a point two hundred and fifty-eight (258) feet south of the prolongation of the south curb line of Fostoria Street to a point two hundred seventy-eight (278) feet southerly thereof.

B. Passenger loading and unloading (white curb)

1. The south side of Suva Street from a point two hundred ninety-five (295) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Emil Avenue to a point three hundred sixty (360) feet easterly thereof;

2. The south side of Scout Avenue from the prolongation of the west curb line of Gotham Street to a point ninety (90) feet easterly thereof; 23 of 29
Exhibit 1 291

Resolution No. 2024-20

3. The south side of Quinn Street from a point one hundred (100) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Jaboneria Road to a point one hundred fifty-seven (157) feet westerly thereof;

4. The south side of Quinn Street from a point one hundred ninety (190) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Jaboneria Road to a point three hundred forty-five (345) feet westerly thereof;

5. The south side of Quinn Street from a point three hundred eighty-five (385) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Jaboneria Road to a point six hundred sixty (660) feet westerly thereof;

6. The west side of Eastern Avenue from a point eleven (11) feet south of the prolongation of the south curb line of Gotham Street to a point thirty-three (33) feet southerly thereof;

7. The east side of Eastern Avenue from a point four hundred thirty-five (435) feet north of the prolongation of the north curb of Lubec Street to a point four hundred sixty (460) feet northerly thereof;

8. The east side of Garfield Avenue from a point four hundred forty-six (446)feet north of the prolongation of the north curb line of Florence Place to a point four hundred sixty-six (466) feet northerly thereof;

9. The west side of Jaboneria Road from a point forty-three (43) feet north of the prolongation of the north curb line of Priory Street to a point seventy-five (75) feet northerly thereof;

10. The west side of Jaboneria Road from a point one hundred seventy-two (172) feet north of the prolongation of the north curb line of Live Oak Street to a point two hundred thirty-seven (237) feet northerly thereof;

11. The north side of Loveland Street from a point twenty-seven (27) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Colmar Avenue to a point fifty-eight (58) feet easterly thereof;

12. The south side of Scout Avenue from a point twenty (20) feet east of the west property line of Ford Park Adult School, 7800 Scout Avenue to a point thirty (30) feet west of the east property line;

13. The north side of Watcher Street from a point eighty (80) feet east of the west curb of Jaboneria Road to a point two hundred eighty (280) feet easterly thereof;

14. The east side of Toler Avenue from a point one hundred ninety-one (191)feet north of the prolongation of the north curb line of Florence Place to a point five hundred seven (507) feet northerly thereof;
24 of 29
Exhibit 1 292

Resolution No. 2024-20

15. The north side of Live Oak Street from the prolongation of the east curb of Purdy Avenue to a point one hundred fifty (150) feet westerly thereof;

16. Request for white curb (10-minute parking) at 7425 Garfield Avenue (Garfield Elementary School) from a point three hundred seventy-five (375) feet north of the northern prolongation of Florence Avenue to a point eight hundred fifty (850) feet northerly thereof;

17. Request for white curb (passenger loading) at 7104 Perry Road (Rio-Hondo Boys & Girls Club);

18. The east side of Ira Avenue from a point one hundred ninety-two (192) feet south of the southern prolongation of Gage Avenue to a point two hundred thirty eight (238) feet southerly thereof;

19. The east side of Ira Avenue from a point two hundred sixty-two (262) feet south of the southern prolongation of Gage Avenue to a point two hundred eighty (280) feet southerly thereof;

20. The north side of Cecilia Street from a point one hundred and fifty-four (154) feet west of the western prolongation of the Jaboneria Road to a point one hundred seventy-seven (177) feet westerly thereof;

21. The south side of Florence Place from a point two hundred eighty-eight (288) feet east of the east prolongation of Perry Road to a point three hundred thirteen (313) feet easterly thereof (Monday through Friday 7am to 6pm 6628 Florence Place);

22. The north side of Gallant Street from a point four hundred and eighty eight (488) feet east of the eastern prolongation of Jaboneria Road, to a point five hundred and eight (508) feet easterly thereof (without period designations, at all times);

23. On the north side of Agra Street from a point three hundred and sixty-three (363) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Jaboneria Road to a point five hundred and twenty-three (523) feet westerly thereof;

24. The west side of Eastern Avenue from a point one hundred and seventy-seven (177) feet south of the prolongation of the south curb line of Loveland Street to a point two hundred seven (207) feet southerly thereof;

25. The north side of Florence Place from a point six hundred forty (640) feet east of the eastern prolongation of Emil Avenue to a point eight hundred forty (840) feet easterly thereof; and
25 of 29
Exhibit 1 293

Resolution No. 2024-20

26. The north side of Live Oak Street from a point one hundred twenty-nine (129) feet west of the ending curb radius of Purdy Avenue to a point two hundred twenty-nine (229) feet westerly thereof.

C. Twenty Minute Zone (green curb)

1. The south side of Clara Street from a point fifty-five (55) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Ramish Avenue to a point eighty (80) feet westerly thereof;

2. The north side of Clara Street from a point eighty-five (85) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb line of Perry Road to a point one hundred forty (140) feet westerly thereof;

3. The east side of Ajax Avenue from a point sixty-nine (69) feet north of the prolongation of the north curb line of Florence Avenue to a point ninety-eight (98) feet northerly thereof;

4. The west side of Ajax Avenue from a point eighty-seven (87) feet north of the prolongation of the north curb line of Florence Avenue to a point one hundred fifty- seven (157) feet northerly thereof;

5. The south side of Gage Avenue from a point two hundred five (205) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb of Emil Avenue to a point two hundred fifty-six (256) feet westerly thereof;

6. The west side of Garfield Avenue from a point one hundred (100) feet south of the prolongation of the south curb at Cecilia Street to a point one hundred sixty (160) feet southerly thereof;

7. The west side of Garfield Avenue from a point seventy-five (75) feet north of the prolongation of the north curb of Fostoria Street to a point ninety (90)feet northerly thereof;

8. The north side of Florence Place from a point forty (40) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb of Granger Street to a point sixty-five (65) feet westerly thereof;

9. The west side of Eastern Avenue from a point sixty-one (61) feet south of the prolongation of the south curb of Watcher Street to a point one hundred sixty-two (162) feet southerly thereof;

10. The north side of Clara Street from a point two hundred five (205) feet west of the prolongation of the west curb of Ira Avenue to a point four hundred (400) feet westerly thereof;
26 of 29
Exhibit 1 294

Resolution No. 2024-20

11. The north side of Florence Avenue from a point one hundred (100) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb of Live Oak Street to a point one hundred twenty (120) feet easterly thereof;

12. The north side of Florence Avenue from a point one hundred sixty (160) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb of Live Oak Avenue to a point one hundred ninety (190) feet easterly thereof;

13. The west side of Garfield Avenue from a point sixty one (61) feet south of the southern prolongation of Muller Street to a point one hundred one (101) feet southerly thereof;

14. Request for green curb (20-minute parking) at 8045 Garfield Avenue(Garfield Market);

15. The north side of Clara Street from a point three hundred twenty three (323) feet east of the easterly prolongation of Gephart Street to a point three hundred thirty- nine (339) feet easterly thereof;

16. The south side of Clara Street from a point three hundred and thirty-five (335) feet east of the eastern prolongation of Garfield Avenue to a point thirty-six (36) feet easterly thereof 6334 Clara Street;

17. On the left side of Lubec Street from a point twenty-five (25)feet east of the eastern prolongation of Jaboneria Road, to a point forty-five (45) feet easterly thereof;

18. The east side of Eastern Avenue from a point two hundred eighty-two (282) feet north of the prolongation of the north curb of Jaboneria Road to a point three hundred thirty-two (332) feet northerly thereof to be in effect from 9:OOam to 6:OOpm except on Saturdays, Sundays and Holidays; and

19. On the east side of Garfield Avenue from a point one hundred twenty-three (123) feet north of the northerly prolongation of Buell Street to a point one hundred forty- seven (147) feet northly thereof.

D. Twenty Minute Zone 7:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. (green curb) Not Used.

E. Disabled Person Parking (blue curb)

1. The north side of Priory Street from a point seven hundred eighty-eight (788) east of the eastern prolongation of Jaboneria Road, to a point eight hundred and three (803) feet easterly thereof;
27 of 29
Exhibit 1 295

Resolution No. 2024-20

2. The south side of Agra Street from a point three hundred seventy-eight (378) feet of the west prolongation of Jaboneria Road to a point four hundred fifteen (415) feet westerly thereof;

3. On the south side of Lanto Street from a point twenty-six (26)feet from the easterly prolongation of El Selinda Avenue to a point forty-six (46) feet easterly thereof;

4. On the south side of Gotham Street from a point seventy-one (71) feet west of the western prolongation of Ira Avenue to a point ninety-one (91) feet westerly thereof (6142 Gotham St);

5. The south side of Fostoria Street from a point four hundred thirty (430) feet east of the east prolongation of Eastern Avenue to a point four hundred fifty (450) feet easterly thereof (5844 Fostoria St);

6. The east side of Ajax Avenue from a point five hundred sixty (560) feet north of the prolongation of the north curb line Lubec Street to a point five hundred eighty (580) feet northerly thereof (6536 Ajax Ave);

7. On the south side of Quinn Street from a point six hundred sixty-six (666)feet from the easterly prolongation of Bell Gardens Avenue to a point six hundred ninety- four (694) feet easterly thereof (BG Elementary);

8. The north side of Gallant Street from a point three hundred eighty-four (384) feet west of the western prolongation of Ira Avenue to a point four hundred (400) feet westerly thereof (6113 '/ Gallant St); and

9. The west side of Garfield (8327 Garfield Avenue) from a point two hundred and seventy-eight (278) feet south of the prolongation of the south curb line of Fostoria Street to a point two hundred ninety-eight (298) feet southerly thereof.

F. Twenty Minute Zone 9:00 a.m. - 6:00 a.m. (green curb)

1. The north side of Florence Avenue from a point forty-two (42) feet east of the prolongation of the east curb line of Live Oak Street to a point eight-five (85) feet easterly thereof.

VI. The stopping, standing, or parking of a vehicle operated by a government official displaying an official placard issued by the City of Bell Gardens Public Works Department shall be exempted from normally legal parking spaces while on official government business.

VII. The City Council finds, pursuant to Section 13.20.800 of the Bell Gardens Municipal Code, that the volume of traffic and other conditions at the following locations are such that the enforcement of the provisions of the Bell Gardens Municipal Code prohibiting or restricting parking by the imposition of the criminal penalties is not sufficient to prevent the illegal 28 of 29
Exhibit 1 296

Resolution No. 2024-20
parking of vehicles, and authorizes the towing of illegally parked vehicles in the following zones:

A. Any areas designated in Sections I. and IV. hereof as zones in which the stopping, standing or parking of vehicles at all or any times is prohibited. 29 of 29
Exhibit 1 297

Exhibit 2 - Proposed Improvements
Gougle Maps
m„
i
���K; � ',. „�, t ( gym° i^� / w. � r�/�%%/� ✓%/r�%J�����'ri ", � ww
i
R
",„%»�7l r�✓� i� r �" /��/// �j niuirvmr��j%�r; ������� �f�r ��%t r �® � A
r �„µ
Imagery P2024 Airbus,Map data 02024 20 ft
UT
Exhibit 2 298

CITY OF BELL GARDENS

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
f b .

AGENDAREPORT
Item 12.

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Michael B. O'Kelly, City Manager
BY: Elizabeth Nava, Director of Recreation and Community Services SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION AND APPROVAL OF A STANDARD AGREEM ENT BY

AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF BELL GARDENS AND THE OFFICE OF PLANNING AND

RESEARCH, CALIFORNIA VOLUNTEERS FOR THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT

CONNECTING NEIGHBORS TO NEIGHBORS GRANT
DATE: April 8, 2024
RECOMMENDATION:

It is staff's recommendation that the City Council by motion:

1. Adopt the attached resolution; and

2. Approve the State of California Department of General Services Standard Agreement No. CV2311401 with the office of Planning and Research, California Volunteers for the Local Government: Connecting Neighbors to Neighbors Grant in the amount of$250,000.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

In February of this year, staff submitted an application for the Local Government: Connecting Neighbors to Neighbors Grant, and in March the City was notified that Bell Gardens was awarded $250,000 for this grant.

The office of Planning and Research, California Volunteers, Local Government: Connecting Neighbors to Neighbors grant aims to strengthen community networks through neighborhood-driven initiatives, increase volunteerism, improve social bonds, and promote climate action and disaster preparedness. This is achieved by local governments hosting a series of programs, activities and events that offer volunteer and relationship building opportunities for community stakeholders.

Program Activities
Over the next 18 months, the City will host a series of events and activities to accomplish the grant goals. Below is a tentative schedule of events.

May -August 2024

1. Neighborhood Block Party& Clean-Up (Northwest)

2. Neighborhood Block Party& Clean-Up (South)

3. Neighborhood Block Party& Clean-Up (Northeast)

4. Community-Wide Block Party

5. Safe Routes to School
September - December 2024

1. Tree Planting

2. Community Gardening
299

3. Food Bank Volunteering

4. Senior to Senior Digital Literacy

5. Climate Action Plan- Community Engagement
January -April 2025

1. Tree Planting

2. Community Gardening

3. Community Clean-Up

4. Safe Routes to Parks

5. Earth Day Celebration
May -August 2025

1. Food Bank Volunteering

2. Senior to Senior Literacy

3. First Aid & CPR Certification

4. Disaster Preparedness Tabling

5. Climate Action Plan - Community Engagement
September - December 2025

1. Tree Planting

2. Food Bank Volunteering

3. Community Clean-up

4. Safe Routes to Public Transportation

5. Final Block Party Celebration
In order to accept these funds, the City must enter into a grant agreement with the Office of Planning and Research, California Volunteers and adhere to the regulations of the grant funds that are set forth in the grant agreement.

These funds are reimbursable, which means that the City will pay for project costs and then be reimbursed for expenses made towards the Pool Project.

CONCLUSION:

Staff is requesting that the Council adopt the resolution and approve with the Office of Planning and Research, California Volunteers for the Local Government: Connecting Neighbors to Neighbors grant in the amount of $250,000.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The general fund will be used to pay for grant activities but will then be reimbursed through the $250,000 Local Government: Connecting Neighbors to Neighbors grant.

ATTACHMENTS:

Exhibit 1 - Resolution No. 2024-21
Exhibit 2- Grant Agreement
APPROVED ELECTRONICALLY BY:

Michael B. O'Kelly, City Manager
Stephanie Vasquez, City Attorney and/or Susie Altamirano, Assistant City Attorney 300

Manuel Carrillo, Director of Finance and Administrative Services 301

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-21

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELL

GARDENS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE STANDARD AGREEMENT
NO. CV2311404 WITH THE OFFICE OF PLANNING AND

RESEARCH, CALIFORNIA VOLUNTEERS FOR THE LOCAL
GOVERNMENT: CONNECTING NEIGHBORS TO NEIGHBORS
GRANT
WHEREAS, in February of 2024, the City of Bell Gardens ("City") submitted an application for the Local Government: Connecting Neighbors to Neighbors Grant; and WHEREAS, in March 2024, City was notified it had been awarded the Local Government: Connecting Neighbors to Neighbors Grant in the amount of $250,000; and WHEREAS, the City of Bell Gardens must enter into a Standard Agreement with the Office of Planning and Research, California Volunteers in order to accept the Local Government: Connecting Neighbors to Neighbors Grant.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Bell Gardens as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Bell Gardens hereby finds that the above recitals are true and correct and incorporate them herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby approves Standard Agreement No.

CV2311401 with the Office of Planning and Research, California Volunteers, in a form approved by the City Attorney.

SECTION 3. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute Standard Agreement No. CV2311401 along with all documents reasonably necessary to effectuate the intent of this Resolution.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall attest and certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions, and it shall become effective immediately upon its approval.

Exhibit 1 302

Resolution No. 2024-21
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 8t" day of April, 2024.

THE CITY OF BELL GARDENS
Jorgel Chavez, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

Stephanie Vasquez Daisy Gomez
City Attorney City Clerk
[Signatures on the following page]
2of3
Exhibit 1 303

Resolution No. 2024-21
I, City Clerk of the City of Bell Gardens, hereby CERTIFY that City Council Resolution No. was adopted by the Bell Gardens City Council at a regular meeting of the City Council held on and was approved and passed by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Daisy Gomez
City Clerk
3of3
Exhibit 1 304

SCO ID: 0650-CV2311401

STATE OF CALIFORNIA-DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES
STANDARD AGREEMENT AGREEMENT NUMBER PURCHASING AUTHORITY NUMBER(If Applicable) STD 213(Rev.04/2020) CV2311401 OPR-0650

1.This Agreement is entered into between the Contracting Agency and the Contractor named below:

CONTRACTING AGENCY NAME
Office of Planning and Research,California Volunteers,hereinafter referred to as STATE

CONTRACTOR NAME
City of Bell Gardens,hereinafter referred to as CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE

2.The term of this Agreement is:

START DATE
March 04,2024 or Upon Approval

THROUGH END DATE
January 31,2026

3.The maximum amount of this Agreement is:
$ 250,000.00[Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars and No Cents]

4.The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the following exhibits,which are by this reference made a part of the Agreement.

Exhibits Title Pages
Exhibit A Scope of Work 29
Exhibit B Budget Detail and Payment Provisions 2 Exhibit B.1 Cost Sheet 1
Exhibit C* General Terms and Conditions Online Exhibit D Special Terms and Conditions 13 Exhibit E Resumes 12
Items shown with an asterisk(*),are hereby incorporated by reference and made part of this agreement as if attached hereto.

These documents can be viewed at https.-// www.dgs.ca.gov/OLS/Resources IN WITNESS WHEREOF,THIS AGREEMENT HAS BEEN EXECUTED BY THE PARTIES HERETO.

CONTRACTOR
CONTRACTOR NAME(if other than an individual,state whether a corporation,partnership,etc.) City of Bell Gardens
CONTRACTOR BUSINESS ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP 7100 Garfield Avenue Bell Gardens CA 90201 PRINTED NAME OF PERSON SIGNING TITLE
Michael O'Kelly City Manager
CONTRACTOR AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE SIGNED
Exhibit 2 305