Bellflower City Council
November 28, 2022

C'� pfl3ELI,F�p4Vrjb_
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
ATTENTION: Jeffrey L. Stewart, City Manager
• .• , . • •
Jason -Senior
SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to conduct a public hearing to consider adopting Resolution No. 22-65 — A Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit Case No. CU -22-11 to modify Conditional Use Permit Nos. CU 15-02 and 16-05 for a behavioral health hospital within the M-1 (Light Industrial) District and the C -G (General Commercial) Zone located at 9542 Artesia Boulevard; Applicant: Hector Hernandez (Representing Alta Los Angeles Hospital, Inc. dba Los Angeles Community Hospital at Bellflower).

DATE:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A Conditional Use Permit ("CUP") application to modify conditions of approval of Conditional Use Permit Case No. Cu 16-02 was originally considered by the Planning Commission on June 20, 2022. The Planning Commission directed City staff to draft a resolution denying the modification request. The resolution was set to be considered on July 5, 2022, but was continued. On July 11, 2022, the City Council considered an appeal from the City Attorney to order a de novo public hearing regarding the Planning Commission's decision made on June 20, 2022. At that meeting, the Applicant was directed to withdraw its CUP application and submit a modified application. On July 12, 2022, the Applicant withdrew its CUP application. On October 10, 2022, a new CUP application to modify conditions of approval of CU 15-02 and CU 16-05 was submitted. If approved, the conditions of approval will be modified to: 1) remove the 8 -foot high perimeter block wall requirement; 2) allow an alternate fagade improvement design/materials, landscaping, and signage; and 3) eliminate the requirement for new lighting in the rear parking lot. For this project, the City Council will act as the City's Planning Agency in accordance with Bellflower Municipal Code ("BMC") § 2.32.050(F).

Accordingly, there is no Planning Commission recommendation regarding the project. —1—

Staff Report — CU 22A 1
November 28, 2022

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

CEQA STATUS
(9524 Artesia Blvd.)
The Resolution was reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.; "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq.). Additional environmental review is not required because the Resolution would allow a negligible expansion of an existing land use which includes modifying existing conditions and conditions of approval related to the existing perimeter walls, exterior fagade, landscape, signage, and parking lot lighting. Accordingly, it is Categorically Exempt as a Class 1 (Existing Facilities) project (CEQA Guidelines § 15301).

TYPE OF ACTION (LEGISLATIVE;
UASI-JUDICIAL; OR ADVISORY',
Quasi judicial: The recommended action includes issuing a CUP. In considering such actions, the City Council acts in a quasi-judicial role. While doing so, the City Council acts like a court: it applies facts gathered during a public hearing to existing law. Just like a court, the City Council can only consider facts that are relevant to the case. A party appearing before the legislative body is entitled to
Notice of the proposed action;
• Reasons for the action;
• A copy of the evidence on which the action is based; and • The right to respond before a reasonably impartial, noninvolved reviewer.

If the City Council asks irrelevant questions and bases its decision-making on such questions, a court may overturn the City Councs decision and hold the City potentially liable for violating the Applicant's constitutionally protected due process rights.

In this matter, the City Council must make these findings:

A. The use applied for at the location set forth in the application is properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized by the BMC; B. The land use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community, is in harmony with the various elements or objectives of the General Plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the district in which the proposed use is to be located;
C. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the land use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping and other features that may be required in order to adjust said use to those existing or possible future uses of land in the neighborhood; and
D. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways properly designed and improved so as to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated or to be generated by the proposed use.
-2-

Report lllllllllllr CU =1 Oil
govember0'-
'age 3 of .

BACKGROUND
Pursuant to DMC 317.44.030 (A)(35), a CUP is required for hospitals within the C -G (General Commercial) zone. Pursuant to SMC § 17.52.030, all the requirements of the C -G District pertaining to CUPS applies to the M-1 District and the same uses are permitted only with a CUP.
• Previously Approved CUPs
On April 20, 2015, the I
approving CUP Case No. t
exterior improvements to
September 19, 2016, the
approving CUP Case No. B
The modified conditions in
completed on or before D
15-02. One of • • • of • • • O' • -•
.e completed • • • - December 1
anning Commission adopted _solution No. PC 16�16116-05 modifying the conditions of approval for CU 15-02Vded a timeline extension for exterior improvements to beember 31, 2018. See Attachment D for complete list of conditions of approval regarding CUP Case Nos. CU 15-u and t;U lb • CU 22-05
On June 20, 2022, the Planning Commission considered a Conditional Use Permit ("CUP") application to modify conditions of approval of Conditional Use Permit Case No. CU 16-02. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Commission directed City staff to draft a resolution denying the modification request. On July 5, 2022, the Planning Commission considered the denial resolution and decided to continue the adoption of the resolution. On July 11, 2022, the City Council considered an appeal from the City Attorney to order a de novo public hearing regarding the Planning Commission's decision made on June 20, 2022. At the City Council meeting, the Applicant agreed to withdraw its CUP application and submit a modified application. On July 12, 2022, the Applicant withdrew its CUP application. On October 10, 2022, the Applicant submitted a new CUP to modify conditions of approval of CU 15-02 and CU 16-05. • Modification Proposal
W lierimeter block wall re uirernent
r i
signage, pursuant to newly submitted plans; and
Eliminate requirements requiring new lighting in the rear parking lot. -3-

Staff Report — CU 22-11 (9524 Artesia Blvd.)
November 28, 2022

DISCUSSION
• Block Walls
BMC § 17.44.060 requires, fences or walls where C -G zoning abuts a residential district either on a side or rear yard, not less than 6'-0" or more than 8'-0" in height, to protect the peace, privacy, and general welfare of the residential district.

The existing CUPs require new 8 -foot high block walls be placed adjacent to residential uses/districts along the south perimeter property line and along the east and west perimeter property lines. A noise assessment study was submitted in 2015 demonstrating that installing new 8 -foot high block walls would minimize all noise levels associated with the hospital use. The total wall length is approximately 1,141 lineal feet. COA Nos. 15, 17, 18, 19, and 22 of Resolution No. PC 16-16 - Exhibit A were included to address the wall.

The Applicant is requesting the City Council modify COA No. 15, and remove COA Nos. 17, 187 19, and 22 associated with the 8400t high block.

Instead, the Applicant proposes to maintain the existing 6 -foot high block walls, repair damaged areas on the walls, and paint the walls to match the approved fagade design (COA included). Per the Applicant's updated 2019 Noise Assessment Addendum (Attachment D), the existing 6400t high block walls address concerns of privacy, noise levels in the area do not require the need to install 8400t high walls because the site has no emergency services (e.g. ambulance) that generate noise, and vehicle traffic on the site is minimal. Lastly, per the Applicant's submittal (See Attachment D), several surrounding neighbors prefer no changes to the walls. Staff can support eliminating the condition of approval requiring a new 8400t high block wall along the perimeter because the existing 6'-0" high block walls comply with the BMC.

In addition, the 2019 Noise Assessment Addendum shows that the existing walls mitigate noise. Alternatively, the City Council could require the Applicant to install the 8 -foot high block walls.
• Modified Site Improvements
The Development Review Board (DRB) conducted an advisory review of the CUP in 2015 and recommended approval of ahigh-quality building fagade design along with new landscaping material and new building signage (see COA No. 15 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 15-10). The fagade remodel is located along the building walls along Artesia Boulevard and Ardmore Avenue. In addition, COA No. 15 of Resolution No. PC 16-16 - Exhibit A, was included with the project to address the exterior improvements. At the most recent Planning Commission meeting held on June 20, 2022, the Applicant requested to only add new paint to the existing building fagade. —4—

3taff Report CU 22=1 1 (9 24 Blvd -11
slovember,2022
.age •
DISCUSSION - Continued
I h Applicant is requesting MIT My uouncli a=,.*, LL
magade that includes a modern look that incorporates metal wood panels and new paint the Applicant proposes upgraded
,olors (e.g. white, gray and silver). In addition,
andscaping to compliment the building design and new signage to match the building naterlals (See Attachment D). The total project valuation is $2.2 million. According to he Applicant, the previously approved fagade design (See Attachment C) and site upgrades were valued well over $2.2 million.
)uilding fagade that will enhance the appearance • ' the overall 1. recommended C. 1_ included e• • the Applicant to paint esouthbuilding •elevationand interior Ivalls tomatch thenorth • building elevations.oo • require n the COAs, that the Applicant complete the improvements by a specific date similar to )ast PC .•• •
• Parking L®t Lighting
nstallation
Vo. 15-10). The previously approved plans included new exterior light poles in the real •. • • addition,•- • �:
1 i • • • �: • • t
addressed lighting.
• 1 1
t allows it to use the existing four light poles (operated by Edison) located alonghe east and west perimeter property lines to illuminate the parking lot. The Applicant )elleves that the existing lights may not have been taken into consideration in the ?015 CUP, but these provide the needed illumination for the rear parking lot. According o the Applicant, the lights turn on at 7 p.m. daily and run throughout the night. 1 pplicant to utilize the existing four light poles in the rear parking lot to illuminate the arew Dut if the lights are not consistently working, then the Applicant/Property Owner mu nstall decorative lighting in the parking lot to compliment the building design. 1 -
adjacent lots and streets to comply with BMC § 17.44.080 (Lighting). For exampl : •rking LED lights were
e `'I- along e east property line; however, e y do ! ::•:
,omply with the BIVIC because the lighting spills onto the neighboring property. Th J, •. • currently •.• Edison to . - o a two lights along _ . -' west :•.. '•' • ' '. ine. Lastly, staff recommends City Council keep COA No. 36 as it addresses all oth ight fixtures on the building be decorative.
m � s

Staff Report — CU 22-11
November 28, 2022

ATTACHMENTS
(9524 Artesia Blvd.)
A. Resolution No. 22-65 (Conditions of approval).........................................................7 B. Aerial Photo, Assessor's Map, Zoning Map and General Plan Map ............................18 C. 2015/16 Facade Rendering at corner of Ardmore and Artesia.................................22 D. Applicant's Project Plans and associated documents..............................................23 r
-6-

A RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE
NOFF, CU 22-11 TO MODIFY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE
NOS. CU 15-02 AND 16-05 FOR A BEHAVIORAL HEALTH HOSPITAL WITHIN THE M-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DISTRICT AND THE C=G
(GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ZONE LOCATED AT 9542 ARTESIA
BOULEVARD; APPLICANT: HECTOR HERNANDEZ (REPRESENTING
ALTA LOS ANGELES HOSPITAL, INC. DBA LOS ANGELES

COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AT BELLFLOWER)
SECTION 1. Recitals. The City Council finds as follows:

A. On June 20, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider a request by Hector Hernandez (Representing Alta Los Angeles Hospital, Inc. dba Los Angeles Community Hospital at Bellflower) (the "Applicant"), for a Conditional Use Permit (Case No. CU 22-05) to modify conditions of approval of Conditional Use Permit Case No. CU 16-02. At the conclusion of that hearing, the Planning Commission denied the request and directed the Director to prepare a denial resolution;
B. On July 5, 2022, the Planning Commission considered the resolution and continued the adoption of the resolution;
C. On July 11, 2022, City Council considered an appeal from the City Attorney to order a de novo public hearing regarding the Planning Commission's decision made on June 20, 2022. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Applicant agreed to withdraw the CUP application and submit a new, modified application. On July 12, 2022, the Applicant withdrew its application;
modification -• the 8400t highperimeter block walls
and maintain existing 6 -foot high block walls (COA Nos. 15,17,18, 19, and 22, Resolution No. • •); 2) modifying the fagadents, landscaping, • • •e; and 3) eliminating the requirement forlighting in the rear deemedparking lot (COA Nos. 35, 36, and 48, Resolution No. 15-10). The application was complete on October-
The application was reviewed by the Director for in part, consistency with the

—7—

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 22-65

G. In addition, the City reviewed the project's environmental impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA"), the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regulations §§15000, et seq., the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Environmental Guidelines ("Bellflower Guidelines"; CEQA, CEQA Guidelines and Bellflower Guidelines collectively referred to as "CEQA Regulations"); H. Notice of Public Hearing before the City Council was duly given and published in the time, form, and manner as required by law;
I. On November 28, 2022, the City Council held a public hearing to receive and consider public testimony and other evidence regarding the project including, without limitation, information provided to the City Council by the Applicant; and J. The City Council considered the information provided by City staff and public testimony, and the Applicant's representatives. This Resolution, and its findings were made based upon the entirety of the administrative record including, without limitation, evidence presented to the City Council November 28, 2022 hearings including, without limitation, the staff report.

SECTION 2. Planning Agency. Pursuant to BMC § 2.32.050(F), the City Council is acting as the Bellflower Planning Agency for purposes of the Project.

SECTION 3. Factual Findings and Conclusions. The City Council finds that the following facts exist:

A. The Project Site is within M-1 (Light Industrial) District and the C -G (General Commercial) Zone, with a General Plan land use designation of (Industrial) and "C" (Commercial);
B. The Project Site is accessible from Arfesia Boulevard, a 100'-0" wide right-of- way major arterial street; from Ardmore Avenue Street, a 50'-0" wide right-of-way local street and from Ramona Street, a 50'-0" to "60"-0" wide right- of-way local street;
C. The Project Site is bounded to the north by residential and commercial uses; to the south by Residential Uses; to the west by residential uses; and to the east by medical offices;
D. The Project Site is comprised of three parcels (APN: 7162-010-041 for 9542 Artesia Boulevard; APN: 7161-010-042 for 9548 Artesia Boulevard and APN:
7161-010-002 for 14727 Ardmore Avenue) is 145,536 -square feet/3.34 acres in size and developed with an existing hospital, office/storage building and parking lot;
E. The proposed building fagade remodel will be redesigned with a contemporary architectural look, incorporating metal wood panels and new paint along Artesia Boulevard and Ardmore Avenue. The south building elevation and interior walls are conditioned to be painted to match the north and east building elevations.

In addition, the proposal includes upgraded landscaping and building signage.

of Bellflower
Resolution • ;r
'a
ge 3 of 6
SECTION 4. Environmental Assessment. The Project was reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.; "CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq.).

Additional environmental review is not required because the Resolution would allow a negligible expansion of an existing land use which includes modifying existing conditions and conditions of approval related to the existing perimeter walls, exterior fagade, landscape, signage, and parking lot lighting. Accordingly, it is Categorically Exempt as a Class 1 (Existing Facilities) project (CEQA Guidelines § 15301).

SECTION 5. Notice of Exemption. The ®irector, or designee, is directed to file a Notice of Exemption in accordance with CEQA § 15062 and any other applicable law. • - site • _ The Project • to the Belliflower
eneral Plan and BIVIC Title 17 (Zoning) as follows:

A. The Project is consistent with Land lJse Element e General Policy 2.2, which is to "provide commercial facilities to meet the retail and service needs of the community"; General Policy 2.7, which is to "carefully scrutinize plans for developments which will have a significant impact on the city or on surrounding developments to ensure the highest quality design"; and General Policy 2.12, which is to "develop strong themes identifying Bellflower as a city of visual and community quality."
B. The BMC zoning classification for the project is M-1 (Light Industrial ®istrict) and C -G (General Commercia), which conditionally allows hospitals.

SECTION 7. Conditional Use Permit Findings and Conclusions. Pursuant to BMC § 17.96.040 (Necessary Conditions Precedent to I of a Conditional lJse Permit) and based upon the findings in Section 3, the City Council finds as follows:

A. The use applied for at the location set forth in the application is properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized by the Zoning Title. •, ^ r • • - -, • • • •: • • r r r • • • • sMir
lkrermitted in the Miiiiisl (Light Industrial) District. The site is currently develope4 it
w is a behavior health hospital, and the Applicant only proposes to modify •,reviously approved conditions related to site improvements luilding fagade design, exterior lighting, exterior signage, and landscaping. In iddition, the Application proposes to maintain existing 6400t tall perimeter ilock walls and remove conditions of approval to install Moot tall perimeter lock walls and decorative exterior light poles in the rear parking lot.

F,h the said use is necessary or desirable for the development of the Plan,
ra Ian • is not detrimental . existing
- .. . a. specifically •__. in
the district in which the site is located.
-g-

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 22-65

The existing use is necessary for the development of the community in that it is consistent with the purpose and intent of the C -G (General Commercial) Zone which is to provide adequate areas properly located to serve the needs of the community and the surrounding area; this also consistent to the M-1 (Light Industrial) District because of the pyramid zoning. The use will continue to provide essential medical services to the community.

In addition, the proposed project is consistent with the following policies of the Land Use Element — General Policy 2.2, which is to "provide commercial facilities to meet the retail and service needs of the community"; General Policy

2.7, which is to "carefully scrutinize plans for developments which will have a significant impact on the city or on surrounding developments to ensure the highest quality design"; General Policy 2.8, which is to "Encourage rehabilitation or redevelopment of designated commercial and industrial areas;" and General Policy 2.12, which is to "develop strong themes identifying Bellflower as a city of visual and community quality." The proposed modifications also include design features and operational characteristics that will help integrate it into the surrounding community and not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the district. Additionally, a Noise Assessment was previously conducted as part of CUP 15-02, which concluded that there will be no noise impact to the surrounding area. The Applicant has submitted a 2019 Noise Assessment addendum showing that there is still no noise impact, despite the modification of some of the conditions of approval. Lastly, the use does not include any emergency vehicles with the operation that will generate noise/sirens.

C. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, and other features that may be required in order to adjust said use to those existing or possible future uses of land in the neighborhood.

The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls, or fences, landscaping, and other features that may be required in order to adjust said use to those existing or possible future uses of land in the neighborhood in that, the site is already developed with a behavior health hospital and the Applicant only proposes to modify previously approved conditions of approval related to site improvements. The modification of certain conditions of approval includes the elimination of the new perimeter block wall and lighting, which will reduce the construction burden (and related noise) on neighboring properties.

D. That the site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways properly designed and improved so as to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated or to be generated by the proposed use.
-10-

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 22=65

Y
3sues. concerns 2015 and
i the modified CUP in 2016. The 2015 Traffic Assessment completed for CUP

5.02 and the 2016 addendum to theTrafficAssessment completed M2, concludedthat theexisting streets and highways are designed and • • e• to
carry - type
_. • quantity
. traffic generated by a • • use;
i addition, the studied intersections and street levels of service would not be mpacted by the project at the time, which increased in the number of patient eds from:1 to 92 and staff from :i to 82. The City Engineer •_ • that he conclusions were accurate and that the streets and highways would ontinue to carry the p- and quantity generated by the existinguse with no "A which are
approves CU 22�1 1, subject to conditions listed on attached Exhibit ncorporated by reference.
a - - purposes _d in - • - City Council 3 s intent
• • • of -Resolutionbe interpreted or implemented by - City and others in a nanner that facilitates the purposes set forth in this Resolution.

SECTION °I0. Re{lance ®n Rec®rd. Each and every one of the determinations in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the matter. The determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City Council in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. •
valuating the matter that absolute and perfect knowledge of all possible aspects of the natter will not exist. One of the major limitations on analysis of the matter is the City Douncil's lack of knowledge of future events. In all instances, best efforts have been made o form accurate assumptions. Somewhat related to this are the limitations on the City's ability to solve what are in effect regional, state, and national problems and issues. The ity must work within the political framework within which it exists and with the limitations nherent in t framework.
amendedbr any violation occurring before this Resolution's effective date. Any such /Vill remain in full force and effect for sustaining action or prosecuting violations occurring • - :- .• - -. effective
a_.a •aa, .thisResolution. e ••
SECTION 13. Severability. If an part of this Resolution or its application is nvalidity will not affect the effectiveness - • provisions or • - • • o this end, the provisions of this Resolution are severable. —11—

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 22=65

SECTION 14. Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with electronic signatures in
i
sgnatures will be treated
inaccordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.

SECTION 15. Effective Date. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption and will remain effective until superseded by a subsequent resolution.

SECTION 16. The City Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Resolution to the Applicant and any other person requesting a copy.

SECTION 17. The Mayor, or presiding officer, is hereby authorized to affix the Mayor's signature to this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City A Bellflower, and the City Clerk, or duly appointed deputy, is directed to attest thereto.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELLFLOWER ON THIS 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022.

ATTEST:

Mayra Ochiqui, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Karl H. Berger, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT:

Exhibit A —Conditions of Approval
-12-
Ray Dunton, Mayor

EXHIB8 I A
RESOLUT�©VA HOn 2211655 o COND T OVAS OF APPROVAL FOR
IMI
In addition to all applicable provisions of the Bellflower Municipal Code ("BMC") including, without limitation, Chapter 17.96 (Conditional Use Permits), Alta Los Angeles Hospital, Inc. dba Los Angeles Community Hospital at Bellflower (the "Applicant"), agrees that it IF
wIll comply with the following provisions as conditions for the City of Bellflower's approval of Conditional Use Permit Case No. CU 2211 ("Project Conditions").

Unless the contrary is stated or clearly appears from the context, the construction of words and phrases used in the Conditions of Approval use the definitions set forth in the BMC. _ _ _• , •• • , _ • ,. . •, ..
qos. 15, and 20 and delete • • _. of p• • • and 22 of Resolution • PC 16-16• 1 previously approvedby _PlanningCommission 3eptember 19, 2016. Except as otherwise modified by this Resolution, all other conditions )f approval within Resolution Nos. PC 15.10 and PC 1611 remain the same and in effect. n the event of a conflict, the more restrictive condition of approval will control.

A. Standard C®nditi®ns ®f Appr®val

1. The project site must be developed and/or used in the manner requested and must be in substantial conformity with the submitted plans date-stamped October 10, 2022 and October 31, 2022, unless revisions and/or additional IN
conditions are specifically required herein.

2. This approval runs with the land. All rights and obligations of this approval, including the responsibility to comply with the Conditions of Approval, are binding upon Applicant's successors in interest. The Conditions of Approval may be modified, terminated, or abandoned in accordance with applicable law including, without limitation, the BMC.
unapproved deviations from the project approval constitute a violation of the permit approval.
action filed in a court of competent jurisdiction. If any Condition of Approval is invalidated by a court of law, the Project must be reviewed by the City and substitute conditions may be imposed. i
IN The Applicant/Developer must sign this Conditions of Approval, as set forth below, to acknowledge acceptance, within 30 days from the date of approval by
-13-

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 22-65 - Exhibit A

7. The City will only issue permits for development when the construction documents (e.g., building plans) substantially comply with the approved plans.

The size, shape arrangement, use and location of buildings, walkways, parking areas, drainage facilities, and landscaped areas must be developed in substantial conformity with the approved plans. Substantial conformity may be determined by the Director.

8. This decision is not effective until Applicant acknowledges acceptance of all Conditions of Approval and any appeal period has lapsed, or a waiver of right to appeal is filed or if there is an appeal, until a final decision has been made on the appeal. By use of the entitlements granted by a development application, the Applicant acknowledges agreement with the Conditions of Approval.

9. Anything which is not shown on the application/plans, or which is not specifically approved, or which is not in compliance with this Resolution, is not approved. Any application and/or plans which are defective as to, without limitation, omission, dimensions, scale, use, colors, materials, encroachments, easements, etc., will render any entitlements granted by this Resolution null and void. Construction must cease until all requirements of this section are complied with. Development entitlements may be withheld until violations of the BMC are abated.

10. The Applicant must provide a sheet on the construction plans with the City of Bellflower signed resolution stating the Conditions of Approval, as adopted by the City Council. This information must be incorporated into the plans before the City issues a building permit.

11. The Applicant must comply with the Conditions of Approval before the City issues a Certificate of Occupancy.

12. Permittee agrees to pay City any development impact fees ("DIFs") that may be applicable to the Project. Permittee takes notice pursuant to Government Code § 66020(d) that City is imposing the DIFs upon the Project in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code § 66000, et seq.). Applicant is informed that it may protest DIFs in accordance with Government Code § 66020.

13. Applicant must reimburse the City for all actual fees including, without limitation, legal fees, expended by the City that are directly related to the processing of this project. The City will not issue a Certificate of Occupancy or other final occupancy approval until all fees are paid by the Applicant.

14. The Applicant agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from and against any claim, action, damages, costs (including, without limitation, attorney's fees), injuries, or liability, arising from the City's approval of Conditional Use Permit Case No. CU 22-11, except for such loss or damage arising from the City's sole negligence or willful misconduct. Should the City be named in any suit, or should any claim be brought against it by suit or otherwise, whether the same be groundless or not, arising out of the City's approval of Conditional Use Permit Case No. CU 22-11, the Applicant agrees to defend the City (at the City's request and with counsel satisfactory to the City) and will indemnify the —14—

Belliflower
Resolution o 22m65 Exhibit
.:g
City for any judgment rendered against it or any sums paid out in settlement or otherwise. For purposes of this section "the City" includes the City of Bellflower's elected officials, appointed officials, officers, and employees.

B. Planning

15. Exterior improvements consisting of building facade remodeling, installation of lighting, installation of signage, installation of landscaping, and parking lot improvements must be completed on or before December 31, 2023. 11 11 1
match the north and east building elevations.
repair damaged s - on
- - block walls• - painted
the approved fagade design.

13. The Applicant must submit and process payment for a Master Sign Program ("MSP") to the Director. The MSP must identify the location of all permissible signs (e.g., wall signs, window signs, address signs, parking signs) proposed within the site. The MSP must describe, without limitation, the permissible design, height, materials, colors, sign type, styles, illumination method and maintenance of all signs. The Director will review and render a decision on the MSP and all sign permit requests.

19. The Applicant must submif a landscape and irrigation plan by a licensed landscape architect and it must comply with California's Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) and the PMC.
then the App licant/P rope rty Owner must install decorative lighting on the property to match the building • - • approval by e Director. grant free access to the business, including access to any locked or otherwise secured rooms, to public officials exercising their lawful duties. cannot be sited on public streets, public alleys, public parking areas or th public right�of�way without an encroachment permit.

3.All rooftop mechanical and electrical equipment must be screened from publiZ —15—

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 22-65 - Exhibit A

C. Building

24.All commercial projects must be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Licensed Professional.

25. The Owner's name, address, and contact information must be provided on the Cover Sheet.

26. At the fiime of plan check submittal, the Licensed Professionals) name(s), address(s), and contact information must be clearly identified on the Cover Sheet. The Cover Sheet must provide the following information:
a. Clearly identified Scope of Work
b. Sheet Index
c. List of all 2022 California Codes (if submitted after January 1, 2023), Bellflower Municipal Code, and OSHPD requirements
d. Occupancy Group
e. Construction Type
f. Fire Sprinkler System
g. List of Deferred Submittals (if applicable)

27. At the time of plan check submittal, the Site Plan must provide the following M
nformation:
a. Setbacks
b. Parking (to comply with accessibility requirements and EV requirements) c. Removal of any terminology that states "Handicap" as that is not an acceptable Code term. The correct term is "Accessible."

28. At the time of plan check submittal, a completed set of plans must include the following information:
a. Site Plan (existing and proposed)
b. Floor Plans (existing and proposed)
c. Sections (existing and proposed)
d. Elevations (existing and proposed)
e. Foundation Plan (if applicable)
f. Framing Plans (existing and proposed)
g. Structural Details
h. Title 24 Report

29. The Design Criteria (i.e. dead loads, live loads, snow load, wind speed, seismic design) must be provided in the plan check submittal package.

30. A list of Special Inspections must be identified in the plan check submittal package.

31. A notation that all Special Inspector certifications must be provided to the City Building Official for review must be included in the plan check submittal package.
-16-

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 22=65 _ Exhibit A

32. A notation that all Special Inspection observation reports and testing results must be provided to the City Building Official for review must be included in the plan check submittal package.

33. All details (both foundation Cl" framing) must provide job specific information (i.e. foundation depth, footing sizes, floor joist sizes, ceiling joist sizes, roof rafter sizes, beam sizes, stud wall size for interior and exterior wall framing, insulation rating, hardware, roof sheathing, drywall, etc.). Notations stating "Per Plan," "See Arch," etc. are not acceptable.

By signing this document, Alta Los Angeles Hospital, Inc. dba Los Angeles Community Hospital at Bellflower certifies that it
Chas read, understood, and
agrees to the Project Conditions listed in this document.

Hector Hernandez on behalf of Alta Los Angeles Hospital, Inc. dba Los Angeles Community Hospital at Bellflower (Applicant) (Applicant)
{If Corporation or similar entity, need two officer signatures or evidence that one signature binds the company)
By signing this document, MPT of Bellflower PMH, LP (Rosa H. Hooper, Vice President, Managing Director of Asset Management lJnderwriting), certifies that it has read, understood, and agrees to the Project Conditions listed in this document.

PropertyOwner)
-17-

LA 0
j b: -t 3 w!{ f _ice 4 *.
1 tOF
IFSrl- 17309IF
pp
�• F' lr
OF
I mo
r t j �" }; LJWQ�-��r, L,li n Z ., } 17316
OFF
,�, I, ti'.?;�� e , ! ILS I,, �r _ , r ` -
a`.F ' i, 1 ait _ „ I❑ ` 17317' I 1 - -
hTN �•
�r .FM1 I ,�_ �� b to IJ I. ,�� �Lill UT, Lq ,?^'a G lnLAI. --- o -' ! - -- p1

N I III
1 OF
W4L All 3i -1 +� w i, a _N --, _ --;-H -- e I a 'I�i C' O Fill
a I ■, -FIF OEM"' OF
f - j• 9571 �}� `� !� 9
F TJJ (I IF -3�__ - '
,
IF ARTESIA BLVD 9542 ARTESIA fib!'.:: `IF
FOILtA
- -�'---Flo OF
'
--- _ - - --- - t _ Vi IF
w
�"
h -
Ir

FOIL OF IF I ON I
IF IF ft
men
I
_sIFFFIFF. IF 04 _
d. i�1SU.B�IECT`SiTEsz:1 I IF F, Implants;
.,
�--
t
ti
III !Lit ;l 1 P. w I i --
OFF, iw
IF 19A
IMP
17427 31-
Far IF,
IF
IF
r Fj l 7834
In MIFF._ ' 1 7.433 r Q'_ .

IF
IF
lur
'. -I psi _
17481 1 Y'ii .
tr
f 7 7442
IFl
W IF
OF
G�IF
r y 17487 I^ --
'
i 17448ILL LU
OFFIF
RAM[iNA 5T
y
( 5
OFF I
OF 4 It
Im
_ �'
w - OFF, F:
= w ti. W W 8
ZJI:
�.IF
SIFF
IF. ILI
Ce�:rp'-.%j7.j _'.1.:53]] 31.1' .-f, a 'a',a_ ,,V(6PAA08W66 -18-
e
w
17457
r
9603

If co
DW
f)
wc7o
(A Z N
1)ao
W o LO
0 and 12�0MCIV
F=- 0 r U!j 5B B5 z5 99 066.n�^�
IL I II I I I ICe,
IL O
°z° I co � I Ilio I m
Ir
LL -H NI I I �° "IMO
D I m O ml I m I I I(31
I
001 Q I 0
Q L9'HzZ 58 85 Z9 55 09 5
> 4205065E N U�aO 99'2:K Md N Fg c
m 03 F= N� Z133HS ro
•A — — — _L 05 O5'ZS4 1 99'141 -
-VH/—
no — — — — DOE L j6+Oz99 0
FOM
ASTOL66 �
Wm
0 L^Y
Z ../
= '^ U
o NK N
L) v/ Ma Nµ �O N..
� CL
N I
aN L4"8LZ
N D) N
C; N O
o O
MO O ry �
----- - MO u7 m00 w
rd �I (Do
�a m
ca m
8Z'8LZ
F-
LU
N N
ti N
0 0 c6 C� a H rn m p°_ N
N ti N
O V
O
O ti 0
O �
M,L0,0 N
C" N N F 9L'8LZ c
ti o
N
ry Lo
0 LL m CDLij (�D
mco — — — — — — — — — —
Lo
000 U m cr) 0
000 0
N Z N �! 1 -
0 o J O
0 0 o r� LL ti
M .-
N 000
cn F ZO•BLZ
co m m LO � _ m
O (0 0_
i N ------ CD CL
CDR' �` ONSN N ----
0 (L m N 0 0
O m m N
U') O F 6B"LLl
Z OU 009 9
68'L4L OU
0 CD
�S$OL951
0 0 £ 133 HS r- 1S d u �£L9£
O O N ! O N LL - - �S+£4661-
00 co co ----- MO r�i N 1 -- 91'00£ _AM2ld JAd
69'L4l r a o m m
^ N N ODE - - 49L 101 �0 9
CD d'of1�01'49M�ONl3 0
�o
LO m N r a
�r�n1 F- £9•LLZ
� N - V '— cow OCf) 0 N COO
woo r �0 ------ �a--
- — — — — — — — — —
o �
5 DOE
� £9'LLZ 5'L9L I 05'LEl
o
� SIN O N
ti
(D
o MO c0 -----?
v r-0_ rn ----
1ED `N m of
0 �N{ Q Om O vI� O to
----- Cn E8'OZ Ell"94�E8'OZ 9"L9L m OS'LEL
LU EL"94L I o LE•L£l 08 Ozz 9
F—
N
o .—I LL I m LL
N o W ti 'd'O I� m �- mI N Ci (�Da O m C o
co - G
Q cNo
0 t�
O W
�_
U)
DZ � N r a I°' N
£eft 141 Z L£"l£L 09
and
tzLZ L L
U)
� Om�
r Zw�
A amU mr
a m ti
_ 1
i9
tea¢
�r`
o
t`
dM-
�
O
N
N
O
O�
z�
O
�--
M
Uo
C
j
�o
in
F..
m —
�2E
as
U
---J ❑D
55 tea¢
�r`
o
t`
O
N
N
O
�
O
C
j
—1-
in
w
---J ❑D
�19-

J ; Ory VY . {{+{ top. 1A 5ILL. I I,v 18 .., 0t'1
ki N ..t', , IJ tt5
L 1 fu
L
i.'h't•.... \ �h51 ' 1A �.
r .71st.., .;;t, a,%. 1 x t .
,f5 Irk`n%1 N t5v%J1 Name Ir t1t41 55 rAut r 5 ! asV t
'r lt1 \5 115. , icip% I'm
ILI1 11111' \
If ' �1V�11v V11 1 51 5III&115 51 1t1 51
Ad I 5
Kr, .
d 3191.
lot I
,.,. I 1 4 0 Lk I
VIA.
} h 1p ' 1 'rd -11, , ID 1z
w, 1'd ... ��
a n 05TV
\n it
1 FLT 4 4Ntoo
larval o 1 44
Y/!Ord I
ATom
fi t
Led PILL,
IS j..,r
r{it14 1 ,.. ,v•' nXNr1r 11Nr t
'
R l;1Yr+ 1N 1,5 }} by
1 rw } 1
IN 2 5x.1.5 5 * :4 2 11
, his 4,1AN L Pr N
, ,/rh5 to r s��• r'
�YN�} odd17309 { r
%V{th
volt
JL LL AlkZV V.VAx1 F.Parrojitod I.EjA I-
...._
OF"
..I � t _ r4
OfFIX W Pik :

IN k
:I�,
C i7�77 t
lJ I To
!� 14 l�
SPIN 1-a 5. W'flol", ON live . r... ,
'
9571 i
1 ARead BLVD � _ ARrFF .+moi =' . A
It
7T
OFIF
N&A EVEN ad
h,5P
N1 fl'
S;l:
.1
or
1 P 64
LIMA
Alto
ad Pat
_ _ III6IFa
a
ARead BLVD � _ ARrFF .+moi =' . A
It
7T
OFIF
N&A EVEN ad
16 W
�fi a
MEAN
Ardor
It
AN
ale
Al ti
$; '
UBJL i

d • . 'O 1rY 'n I.'V T'N 0 tJ{6'j;'r.:{5;''}r}:YXYN .Iy I 'µ !{ v��;'rn{vll}:i5{?{.,,i::•;:1rlilrrrw)IIaTwra,rfo•,nv �ry,273�0� ''�-'t�• '''''��'We - Vol n.L X71 IIi L{ {` {71 �• .. :{ �'Y; :.` _ ,f: rw:: .• 5,�.. •u 5K} Li 155 k. },a N ' .5\• i71 :` •:' ¢ {. r . {}Ih{4:,,Zk;-r,.., a •v, .m I::nv v, w, 6 } h., 5 :�.� 11 W I{Yr11 ? 15.,51: �4 ge,AI {v?Y. ^l/:5 r.'•$}YJ:::...,:: i. �A._. 5 Vit r d }{{1•^ }.'. jA:;;i1 :{. PJ Yh.: v INE }•1} r ti
aL�y)�p� 5 A ':.{ �:L:I 'yr n5 {?u?'.77U; ' {xk1 nr. S r 'i3 { 'ru vJ /}11 :! W. S,AG'.`.I : r.. - r{`! ` 'h' (h.1 i\ V ,ul!'Y54'arN ' }} tis' iM'4:% lY.,S,,YJ 5•''• { A :1. f yi ? � ,NII b: • :y •{ ..Y1' J W`�5'' r }?r w 5 5{ .'kvYr' _ 5 r 73 0 4 4h t {
7 :VY . K
;:. { ', '!�t,I,, '.1.{''JV N5 5\' S ^Y' r L .• i F, i , .If A5Y - y11� s r n Y {+J r 5 ! Moivh0go �,/ k
.• �` •/ r ,�N� ,��y�•r�Q`,.,{ 1.� 5 5., . , % , J, M' tV O/� }Y i !7 -S �y� J ' Y 51YMY"'.}'!1"5 � !.111}•, Y7 •:i YL,r141N1Nh .h1.I�:, 1%:•4 'h f \{hf..4 .: aSuuxutl0�}Ylwu,u'v,uuJ,,,atuw. ' r (Lr - 4; r �'::Lvr'r''..J,i y1'y'j'. YJag .116 }W'hK5' {1 {' :'177.': i',jW.YI I elle ... 1K 5• ;•y, '•!!'SY r y�lAloo ti/6 fjh '{ •1Y. ..A, ri J/N r.Vhh{{411 hSri:,LANo IhrL.S�'Y !N. SN ,b1. s 5 ''! . J/?:.,X!}}};,� y\ '.\,tWS�Yhv,{}N 0, 5 � t5„T,Y'•n .'ffr r Y ' j �N_ rrlh ..{i,:5.. .. , Mr AXI. I'1Y171J 11b#1 4 6 } { ,. 1 , `. J lh y 15 r1 IA yl }1 • yY 731'/ {/r ri . t :5t•'{I yt :;1, ::...v i
5 /r:r:1YJ S : 17 1 .'.W�w.''�1.ii{3'.�'• r'i'':W.7,' Ti ,+ ! . xl! : .hf, ,r 5 Y r5ti rJ t J1 r ih .. ,.r 5, AV r!?. ! 1,: '} h15J145 .L. '. '^' r ! J 5 ^.
' - ..k ! y'
}K vIx i! y 7!5551 317 iso v. J lSYfN r 4 yYr\
Y •.1/. All ill ..,, V.7�{,:y rte' 1Y�,lYi 754 !r!: �i5ir„1N,' �1L5ihV&A': t� '[t' J v 5 •5 V LII , ,. �{ In 1 1 f'j 5 I - {J, 1� .r5baz LfS. Sl• ter rYl' 1 �,,;I 1 • ' r{ , Ia5 •' .y UI.5 • A �I � n. � C. i:. � 1L5 . G r {1y 7p1 V1 .h .. LII J {1. VI I *4 y „1 e i, ? m y k. L1 V 1 k: W .u:aIa in j/,Y;,1' _� q aHl v aryl i{ v Vit. 5r. tie/!5 bb11A1{{':!Vi , ` „ iI' :., fr ,,\;}} 1Yr� y?' YY,.�` ,.

X55 } eJ „ 9571 s I r ;{r,'}.: }`'
KK hN 5W 1 r h 1 5 ?:1 ,; Yh' y 1. f, yYr ':; •`T .'I 'S5r _-
�_� ARTESIA BLVD R �5, 2 Af TESZA AI4" , -- 1 _! ;m-_ _ ' `I I
r _ 1 - � _. - _ - ...� 1L - +._-_.

LL - 1- 1
-�_-. .L_,.-1--- - ---- 1
' KY' 1.5 r .1114 ,.;� m" J lf,I' }rt{1 - .. - - - _- !h5 { ! {� �����,. �.�� .,• ,,..,,,� �,�,.., y,,h�l r �=I ,5. {'}llrl7b'ry�.%5'41.5\'�{`h!55•yj;rj m Y :! , ! ni?{� n? y}{ m4/ {n 1 {JIN { ? v 4 eyx Siilrt. tM':;' :Y nt ally:•/Jy, : Sea
JF JAS r
C55'11 Vr31 ,f 15 V\NYJ 4 %/5% }. } / 161,7 NNyh .iM:iJlhV.}Y_M' :.YJ{{rMNrh\\:; A{"'r!rl tell 1 Jr 1 ` J1 ., 11 ,.. w t . f;fe.:
y1 , hA.:, : V.vJ.w.tttux, ....J �!. ... //�hN.r,. h1P� .rU. ..N{':r(,J t,, Y::. 1111: ! �� g S.::JM".
v 5 ! I'. 1 i1 a
r^! 1 \ :' i :. 1. w 555 we O f}%{%%1.

Y
}
:...S5} !1 55 \ J11/ 1f K 71 :. �I 51 ! 5. '� QI
•'{r! / 1 - I Vs :51 ! Y, 51 5 . N: hA Is •. i.; -. .5 5 5 5 5; I - - !Vl11 it 11.7,..1 /! 1 . .

Vr{ r I ....�•„ ..1.l.II �.. 1111�1A�, 1lr 5! V Iif
5 \ 5} .rl 4 ' - ''6t I I'I ,Y ,111, 1 rSrtJy 5y ^'
11YI h {y JJj. ! % h 15xtd }, Y•.. I J else. 5 5 - 8 }res! ICC Jr j•,t:� �, !{:'?} .;!,1 A11 h5 :1 7 1 •;.V. 115 ,?' N .. P-7 'l t VV/•. ! m:
5111\i4Yr /y .�'l. .%.. , , ! ::i': %Vu:i• 1J.V.. � l: r y,',/�,5y� .`Y!'y'i:{SYr�A! 15 t7Y t V1
;..j �'j y{`�:,•Y,J ::JJ; J1 5fh L "5' : ! h'% U1 ?I % - ., !r: h5 Ir ;',jY„ T 5.{!l, f:
..JI:'J((: {''�i;:?51 rtiiee Si}`}•. "j�r {ty{ ti' a - :'i:}•:a!: m.. -_ .i r 44I I r%r ,t 3 . t j rjJ . I:d'. •1w :ar:l`• r:rY' : {3. ..11.. , . ,.1'r7i^'i I '7fi,J,h.r,..: •, 1.,ag {5'' . J }I; N V�I .Y.: }.,...N ,a 1 ;M,a �. .,. 5. i/,Y', �:f,}r �'hS xA}; l N 1I �J II \I '' J. /'�5
1 jJ15YY y t - 1 1 to ti �.. V -- r 5; r 5 r^v 4JJrrA, r •. 5?:self! ,�,�''��\�'77 VJ \ (( ,YS: 5, } r
MY% lV? Nk4I 5 4 y 4!A\ll•WV]'Y le.4•r•rvr,. VInII\ , ,

4. rNN,, r 1 JN •'' +� jI hSJr-_ ak I j 5 r JJt yYr/h'i 1! uBJE SITE � �yl
V}:1\.YINel 5 5I L,IY " JrJSY'S 1 bW? NKi yl:rN.. V 55//''{t, }•• •• °'It Selly 4 Y ` Y•lJJS', 'Y {r ty •5K „ •':r ' I 'a :Yrf'+ 45 5 ,r;. • .,.�...
5• t I" 4{ :J. 5: Y•r 1 1y3 L .\y{ ,1
1 Y
3" 5. ;Cyr 4A5I1 a ,:1:I 1. ... ......1 ... Aa .1}Il}.r..I? 7 ` �}:
"i v ,' •. : 1} r II.1' 1 •.11. y.•a 5.: reel+{?.0 ..5{; , :iiri` J1; 'i 5 : w' S +54 • y5 r 5y 4µt 'tht IatI , y., .5 5�.. r y. M5557'.

I1 .:.:'.
k..

J:,., .5 w
V , , ' f; ::{. .1,4 N"5 '.1 ! y 1N r{ t r elle.... 5 r/NShYt. 'J ,......�.....i ,� 5 : 1 ! . J '+ ,.ViVN/ t . elle
.VVr %'.v 1 /5.. , ,, {.{1,f^55 yflh H..S ... 1 I'i5'!'� (ry! t /g5 1K1t{5N''jlt'N('r 15Y`'• ''r ! ^45 II , 4'• 5'. 'N�' J :r .rl 1.•}• /j 1! ,..'1 !, Y�J .'}It'Y'y51• 1'JII •,yh JY55 1 J 4,(YV11/11114WII I ..h1.r...Ir J .? .1 17d�7 t I 0• y,1 J NllIX,•.ur hrV". J A.. \' Y11 r J J r ' ! 1 h C� !' X111{' ¢ 5
A1..' ' 4741 } htiK {' IwI Y % n K!J , !
Ch1 'l:1. 4 11 I N Jrcf K V' V ' M !Il
{ {S � v, , 4r s{ 'i Y h r }f r
tr' S : 5'JwY Vh'V 7J! / , , 7h ' !:
jYI, 1X`51{�V., y,r6 'K:' {�.Q�S� {' '4 r ,4. : d' .. , 5 - m:.___ -- - - r ! �r+ /YI'{1 ' } ! ,b fFI,H'�Y�;);:}:,:�Sbb;,.r _ - �,K, SN,:v:Iv'1!K rr,
.« lane vlh: 11•' 15.11, _ :L :A'!1'K515" omK.¢5}Illi JoelIA rxr,J,, µryYf1 rrn h A .! o {IrSI JI' Y::':' t?{•{1, _ fJ V}:' {,.. r:':i:: '.h• hY'• 1!!!.'1'*kk; P 1% 1F,: .nnt, 5 { !. JAr. '::. J' i/,1 r• / ... `14 111 V.y{/5I I frN 5x' !f{5�1 . . %1 /} :.hrh Ul s 5 "111 ^?,f;a C' 0 rJ 5 i;}'1 7 V.J

1.{} 7 K5� y 5 y 5V1':Vi; : 17dJU 5 M5
Ott slut 4 !. . , 551'15 , ,IJ 5 1sa?::; , ! tii3}I ( t • 1 • 'Y{ 4 .5�\ ` 1\: 1 �f 145.1 � � 5r .�' SY' .-iiSJ?
Cty , vn rm, 45 ''{15 r�ri'y5q• 11 7433 A Y 1:�{i:Zi�'�.4' - t,l 1\1�mIA $11 •t;, 5• V 5 \1 ,},nes• :}!51 n• y1x;11 of; \S\v ,5t'A 45t 4''t4 'til?:{L \;�J,:,d v5 5 4 \Li: II�J y,NJ YvAN I 5;\• .45 t5e.1 ,�'�[ t}'}J77,W,. 1. r. - 5 r 5
I- :�" . i3{1:\ N5J 1 615E 1 - ', :,'r yr! �{ 5h' ID 5 f.�: i- }:S 1}. 5 i41 k ,17\, 1 h l.7Y1i1?1 �{vh. 1r 5 5r'ih:i 111 / ry
f }1% .5 Iif Ld. J' o II j.6 N%a }1Yml: rl
5 \ - ti ii_ ri4h{' 4r ?hu I ! y, '�}i{,vr 61 r u y5 r r'•5�}jr \\ \1 1 �1 4 Nil 0 'to y It .. 1 ! r K1 {^}t}'{' t ;4\SaYr . l,.h 11 �:l.r. A t ?hl "5551 taa'11f' 1'111'( 1''155f Y15 1 '\ 5 1 :1fn r.V'• .J !\!{.;�J 1;' ?f14., �.; 5 :1;;' f gYY.i;'':!iY1 +'r5 1+ J'4� r !! \ 1 y`� ` `1 t1. A:5�5.:1`\• •5 , 5175 h� ,.}';:'•'�,{1 ,�f If't!'rr K•r - 5.1 '. ,h�,... { L i, 1.�.. .. 5 4ti.. .5�.}A Y 5 . 5 51 1 A { 5 51yy�� y 5 5, 1 J7�+'�1 K}:t:x1' r� i\.:�;i5�.,'{{} ,, ��5 'A % K1 Yt1,t 1.1,,}{yy n /i: 'r:5 tvti 115.5.,:r, 17443 1y /1 J 1/ A %{if1-sten ',rrljl'I}.1.' ?"•''y• 5 r 5 r r. i \ 15 v. 51,\:
yI I � s 1 t v 5\ J 5s' 1 In :h {{ J t kY14 uU 1AUi: „y,{ti%%S \5 ,, I{1:N1 0 \, t ��i \` i 5 I .. y5 �i }I 512 yr1'\ 05 >I yr LIN A - - -Ap.;r � YU,tSw,Shvh:vxhw.'i : h' ,n,s•Ati.,.� {. \ �1
�1 �� 1, 1L .:SK, var,5 , ,,55 ... rye _ M
!'•\ `` �- R W ? ,'•51 ,5♦♦ iIIIa:IA10 ' VON �u, h1 y5tvrY V . • i ,'S 1 ' :ti v''�f %16 , {: � 'y U 111 .\ + 5 Ya t h \\ Kt` .j%,{'.{, 5.. ! ,Au'1'/A R utI .. 5 \ :•:j. �4i 1!'41v{ ,fYt a },:• •J}k1�4}:::.'•1.::':A^A ?"h: +7v r: ,rnr?1 v '1 a :avY/''' r .,. 174 d 7 r};.;;p. r
,'w ao y{}W1/'lAi: % tor`%$I .J! {: In
114j'M.1` t � \ t 5.1T .1,R AN "51 \\,\ ..11 ::vYri{,5Y51''h 5`5,{ S 5 J5 r 51'\`{ �,,,u�. r� - 55 h.}L r:\:..• 1 v, '`I 1" r. _. Y.:.•,•; 1 K 1 5 j5 r 1J e ` K1. 17448 n f I.
l y 5 1 51 1 t 1,Y _ 11 - 1
5 Hy\i145y {} . 5 i nM1tr �t4� e 5 t5yA5/ a}�4r vi Ih II W r \, }�r5`I v 5 K 1. 7n.
{ 5¢ ,; l% •, } t 1 5 ?'' v y51:31 t r 1 5141Me I a hp, Y `{"11 .; ' n U \ 5 \' ::+itih',.55•' S r rVf i'{ti Irl : 1 1�1 1745] Y.1Kv;J 1 5?{'h' Y : 1 5 Ids { 1 As Sy15Yli5, Vr 1511 ' 5 .1 . V 5 r,
`.;,\7r i>.?5i4;;Yr 6ys1v-51164arp''.N57;I 1R {V I M ti^last 1"A 51�,:. °{ Sr3'r'Ynt1l ,� } ?J , \ i r J !v "5 i ,.?u.51 x 1 r 1 5 5'/5 ?1y� - '
'•Y r'\ •r1y1,1 r { 1 I5{ �rSI 5 7 \ 5 J1,,1 AAV.11.twI•:1�iyf%1Ylh' ! � 1n151111 I,II,a h ,. n `1.. h 'fA?:1l5 1 1 571V/r51 r A y1 % 1. : N 1 n ... ••• •• I 1 :: / 3 !K •5A ,, -5 \ (t5t S, I5% r5 M1 h 15 J.'{YY55Y!f 'h:{ S 11 I �s 1 1 S N} s .I' r 5y f�5} {11FY 9 iI0 it: • tv 1LKW 4 - 1 ! !, d3 { / 5 'l.:l ••• y\ II.! IV ... 1/..I:N .5151!7/!/ -\M !JJ �? V!f{1 M,I5/,7{R`l5tit 5' rti �h '{ ! ,•,5. \� IHi 5 5 5 5 15I ;�}:,.•\5y5rV h5t5'S �f5{.. 5! 5�1Nn:'.; r,,: 5`I.y}}.i +{ 54, 17' Jr�;. Ir ,yy,'M 'el �!' I. 5 7,Ii. 5V1 1 J• 11:1...! •,',{Y�1:Y5, }I \Y lt` , t5 Ali 5 4tr , { \11 1,i: 5\ ! 5� j r 1 1f�.•5N,551 5 5 1'. �51�,`/yy, ' , 5 I .:i51I Ito cc d log •...:.5 '.�._.IS• 1. f --1,.,..4k 1 7 5 1 t 7 1'1K {Y, 1. 5.i} ::VN.�'•5,'•L{{,'i: {A1'• - ..5'., '.1'� 5 '+�I I -'� lIF - e�� + 1-i - 1 I (i l �,1- � T� _'
_4 ,r S� Ad 111 11 11 01
RAMONA 5T i '� op NAP - - t
\'15 M1 •1'51\"hYJI•'t1Y!'S111!'::h'. 5•. `hK11 'V'- 1"}•\t 1.'1rJ: J::Je11'a:1Ja'e4xx•tes y '•n'r4�:t 5 eA•,1"!.� 'WJ4 '•5.. .1,V; r:A .551 - '{:9 4Ki ss ..{ 54 : � . lite \51 .hit\ 511 'i{' I"'14,. }6`11'1 1! !..15'1 i15V11 a�Il.�.�,:'455{:'::rN.'{{}SN7{'.y.'Vrly j, A { 11{ 5. {J r,\'% r.'.K, u: i A l \ 5 t ^.5 u n
5I '' F34K. 1' 1 51 3� 'I'• 1 I'•1.}1,. ..ty 11AIagenttv;.Y.1II.h.1I1M•:•a'I irr.Ia.I. II 11.: Ih1o•A!l11111t}:
•le; ,A /.YnS:{•' i� •I v 13.11 1 h ;^:' v7/ 1. . t.I,...I , ,Iu......I.

Y}:{;!i L, , 4 Y: 4..,..I . 115::.•5 rhYr::.
1 5555 5'?.: }.': !.1. ":154':,1{ ' S , 1111, �� 11.1\1.. }h N..551I\5 5 "5Y 5• 1{ X55,•. t 1' :5' . 5.. .5 e. " .1 1 I A'1 i{:!:'1II :: i'4 f I I! 5:':'J' II\1i1.g.. .IS\ A1... {t !w, tn4 1y•,'4�:Y} :e,. LI,J'iol::I0aa, '6114, }. {Y 4'4't5 ..II1. - '•r'. I xv.J:1'IL.I,IIIAJ:1Ilbail,,.,,/.1:Y}rrli ,YINe:SKIII J,yi\hi•. .\.. 1�'. \:' i'l IM1 551! 1 'y'' - '111. ..5... '•'V.. 1.......!' .�1:':" 5.. Y .1 INNAI1 V
{ v i 1}. v,Y:. \" iNIV...Y: IIS}'^ h, 1 IIj V hvY{{1. v} { . ''Y.., ...KVY ^e'4w,Y;;,tY'I:v: ^,x:.' .5 h %ite , rtrv;` 41111'' '11�} 11\• i I }:Sr'•.; 5 •ing1\5 •i;ease JJ... ,{5, II}LJ.;... �. K;:;II 1 15^ .':CI; { :5 41!511 .11. 4. " r ?I C; Yr'iA}i}'{" j:5�'71f:•SvI:.r vL.•111 :I};i:

L } . X:,I 47., v\ I { } {:;.?4131. 5�'sy� n .,v,. r t . J., ;vl:}.r:' ri } y 5 :,1,59I�'Ih 45! 1' h .} - '1• r4. •.II{'-ri:r,t{r. 5} �:':ti6:' 6 .1{ vr.I 11.1 Y {' K III F. Ar 55 S1';.5'1 >:};{!;:;,11 .15'4:' \ , 1 •'S 'J`11Vear Yea. { 1• - a.... elle ,. .4. r1 {,1111!, W �l5f,%II .f'if& 1?'fAJ aII S....YJlh' .} . it 1': I}..: 'I.51Jt1'g Il l g } 1 ,5 '.?'1 t1}.{i J1i{'ii;':i:•4: A { 5 1y I %%Fill 922 5\ ..Y.v Iti J' s a •.v:r.Y1 • ,5 vat ,h,, Y' }. .11,,,..1,16., .6.,...1}•h,.I ::/.'::r}315:Ya:5{.;`{:
,'1 :Y;r:lllr .h i . 63 •':• 1�1 51 J 1 g 7 '. Y:1 Ih;?}':{?,}.,'Y...hYI 1 .5 !:'. ..1.5 y�.; 11 b1` .\! SSC v ll n , v �1:I 1 511': J::1hI .I'{Y}?....I,. .

F5 1�� 4 hY'Yil 11% 11 ;xS. 'Y}:5t.. }•. 5 ��,5y1� \ '}w;;:::JYI:Yr:::v'•S}SY.}i: %%']114}YY{5r::h:{{{';Y:: r.,}::; 1:\Y}r' S. r r ty4J1'yr, IrSY/r� 11 m' i 1 ?MN. `ti'r{''`l T*e,v?e4:'•:411'h5v:•'Y:' 1hI?.}:ie:J.1.rL.I'..:::ivhwr7y 1 .. 5'„ 1J. 1lI % :1 11 1 1; ,. l I.vI.I 5 ..5?I 155\:. Y' 1 5 ..1,V 5'1 .:rt 7• t : 4 ,. VI... j, th1;L , { NK•}.VK:"'.. ': '?r1 1A�!J l 1VJ;4:5YiF Iry Is III 110, rem IFIVOIt i • :{• 5'r. h :.} IJ ! I,1\I1'{•\vr:;55yvr �r•14i 1 'i' 1I�5.4151 f1{ ':, ��'I?.;{I\ ,,'{t:}!:' •: 1115:.51:":jvr:; :4?•i ;•.{5:1Y 11 5};r:6:.?I, }+: 4 5 n, glryr{'{'N Irr 4: NM� t1� }:51\ I YI' r }LI,!.L., {;' ,I I hl ��pp}}''''�� ,t 451t \:tt 4 S;•I.4 I•.1:••A 11'.•1I.I 1151 IN,I,?:I I I1 ::4.5'J� Val a 04 }! g , u�xri{I1J}t4;, GC5455Yr1+.� \ \ r1y1;:':": We I 151 ,ht `''YY51t?11:Y:::{%{;6?3::
{'}1111 4 ,{/l.I,I 1 1 , .5 Y'.A I .l.:.h 1ta:I. 1' :le,SI {, I 1111 15•. IL 115 1; 1..\Y}::: r:::'Y:.?:11 'I.{,H•:•v.: 11 I :{ INYINIFIVI , ?•� Y.J;;• yIN vIM1!11wsill {IF I {11 -\ 1 , }SaR:,y..II•I I.}.•I, :51'1:1:}:....L•: :S K". :.SII h ..t :� {ii'1. 66:'.66' r4:::1r.
.,..a:t ..v.., v m15 a1JJ5r1::;•;sY.:1n3v:}vf.Y:?Y;x: YY;;6: }�l'%^S}:'r.1.. nY 33 .•ILId t 5v Eh5. :`{• 5,v,.;{;51.. +Iia vL; J.?:41?'1.::.,:•,YJI;Kvrr1::N,11..1.1Lv1:{:n:alavl::.Ks7• .. t ��1,1 '1:.5 5 7 .1 h .No IaI k'.:'?5':'.
1 .5r 1•}:i 1�.�' :] Y51 ^.t ,151.IIIIaIIIII:::III;AI}:J:':'.:'::: 'A1;: 'I::.:'I15J'II:rY. Y ,Iyl/' l..1 .hl. 11..; J
\4 5' $� :� tY::avx.la hl41
,'-EN 5 ;155 N ,5 .J. N �)%pl Jr'.55:::{'. r. 6 111 K. h 15"l.. J�.. SIi.IIy; III'. ,, 0.

1. ;y C3 m ..1 ' 1•A5 �0 YI�1s rL '151rY` 5J ,. r,,.I.... Wrl.h�55} I'S: •,1 51,; "17.}}: Ih "1 . .1 . !!'a W:'Y:I IpA to . 11 . 1.114 51n14:}:Y.{'.':'(,71{'?61.{ :.?V.5'.I1. I ,5{1 }3'::"::. h. ,}1.5y I' ytry ., 1 t 1:15 4/;I}I;r 5.1.1':. :'151 vrp� I•.N 11.1 i.5':.' '11144.. a .ti :M1, t." ,,}, i:4:i}: }:'.I.rrS 5 14rM K{rI-i•:y v.,i !r,., .IA i±'::i•A.. J. .ti:ii:'}'r1::.....{vI:':Jess,.. gI. ! V xo:ii' '6.;..... Na r'IY, 1 4111. l %I
:i,5(;, •.Y 5111 Yl.: {•:.. YV• 1�, .1. '.

1. , b l : 'S4 ^;ht'J,Sol I:'4/'15V.y!•'. r1.
l:y?'r ,I %A'S� r r5'.; IIY.:::16:4::%:.AL. It5trI1.,.11rL.*I I }'il''S'rJ1N elle. , J}I rev. v+ h.. ..n.,1,.II,. r,h:" - ''r 1141111.?•r 1 LtauyN n},5 •,.1¢'rii5l' 115 ...1:
yj 6111??; JA`::::M. .4166!... N h5115µ Ih Iulg..g.1 h':•rh:lIlt .N 5.1 1'. :': '7'. r' • 11sY.. 1 .Yr .h 1 rhe. ".5 hI...I.%A?I II .NM.IhI. . :.V 1 41171"' !'i{'• ,r' t5'1: "V.'....11...II JJ55��'Y ,.1V.',". 5V .l, t:
. V.,. •114 ,'.'I }N... :I '!?7 'JM1t".'.:'fa.. •:?'It5 .a1.. 1 .. }�t'1'/4 hM1 • :NJ+: h51.I.'rl../ h 115.

1.11: _ {':., 111111.11 .1IA1Y. IIh Nr.1'}r\1l1:::r.11J7::r l�:N:'r1YJA\., ��.,r . :6:?i{1. l:: ::': I ,, :'I! lI.11... �..1. 111a....1:r. :'F ..{'e1Y;:.'.'h....I..,.r1.h.1.1..1. , h".LK 1{- f 11 . .1... .5 ,Sy.I . SII..,.. / i 'r,\ .1.1.1.\I.I IAI .,W:tr. ++Nl:'rrhlVly. Jr . '1151'.;{Yf :I A;Yy114 1..51'715' 'S ;,{' "11..1. 1:{1... 15 15{1'Ss eJ` 31 .4. ,
4 •1I 1t{1.' .. J. :5'! :'7.4.5':':.1!"' 'rl. .!l,I.I... i �:::.1.. :.' .elle, reel r.
.elle J. '::•I J:,
-1.::':11
,, a ;I . rr. : .. 5 ..5..::Iel SI {..n............v;lvfk<a......1.5••yvp y.' - .1 F II1dI4 Ip}i 1111{.. }1"u'.y1;;I !.1..5..0 ItII... 1 •.Y r ;1y' '%n5: elle• 4:11.}:: { 7'I . \5'11,! :•1 .. Y.:'.: •.h. 1 h 4:N II V t.. v ':blear si m:: 174:,: 1IA
1 .. I 1 ,1. 115 I S}'} }•415...111 5 II .Y'..11, 16 I I

1.1 . I 54111 I;;{I :•: fi': 1: :I I SIr 71; 1.. 1.: 51}{ . 4 1i, I of 15'::x. ?'.:V {::}1YI\?'.5: '.:..1 r:
' ;5 x,�' 15,; r I, :.3,1 {. !Illegal!
".5':. ' Y": }?::„ 'let' ..\ %{•I:!•1Y•5 II}II,Y 1 11 11111 I.g1,..{i,/{::JI::J::l i.:{{i '•{Y'I}l. I Y:%4J,i'. ; f5\11 rr,.� .r.? W1 teal• ' Iv:mI^k. v 3 'Fr}: ill}1' 1%: 4 a%:1:? /' I ,II`u. 1 '' u 1 v. ::I Ii{{'4 ; h 5 S j,Y;J::: h,'
�' 5 7 ! 1 S"7• 1Iv: ! 1. ^ J ,5 .7 M I r k !i I se ' }?S;;J r 55 r h e; 5J11'.S.Yi:
1 ."i J�1 J! •1' 451 `
7!1 }• . !' '11;55 rn' :Y 11;1'4,. 71 5'511 5, l } l{'.{:_.1.:.5'1}yYJ::J'1:k;,•}}:?::. .. - V •Yh' I h r 1J� 'r\:: t... Ql.:.: .: et I. v3y }16}1. 1. J/. yl :f 7 Ih 551'x:• • YC.'1' ''.. 11 'x:.I; '', 5 1 yy 1Y. I,y,• I,1114•r f'1 7{41..,, 15 Y.5'::"base I {•• % y, L - s -l -M •••'^•'+M 5.511 t'!:{511. l Y' - Il.,.:l 1.11 :'.:,' 1151!1 4y1.. 111'SA1;M1Ar1?4}.Y. h.?I I551.,1,'I'. 5 rj{}.'1y. Nei ?4'1{V'N e:{•:J r•,V 11 'J::: •1 K1, ' _p:r a 1 ,-: Ap; X111'1 i cl' __ .f I 1 ., r. 't, .:u....aJJ I 11.1..1 4111.:4.. M1 4.11x! . {II ;1�n Srl:rr:.1 r.:}.I, i.r1,.1.: }'.:
.:"F'84-' f�\g : A5 rt':Y:.-.-. Y:.r '1{ J. ?{ I. h.. 5. 111'!14 �:: J:ih'J 4.. 'SJ L .1 yl'.i1'�A 1 rn,:IYh 111:. }... -21-

r11
-22-

ATTACHMENT 1 TO CUP MODIFICATION APPLICATION
OCTOBER 109 2022 SUBMITTAL
I. APPLICANT AND PROPERTY INFORMATION
■ Applicant: Alta Los Angeles Hospitals, Inc. dba Los Angeles Community Hospital at Bellflower ("Hospital")
■ Property Location: 9542 Artesia Blvd., Bellflower, CA 90706 ("Property") ■ Zoning Information: M-1 (Light Industrial) and C -G (General Commercial) II. SUMMARY OF REQUEST
The Hospital seeks to modify its existing Conditional Use Permits because the current cost bids to complete certain items are infeasible. The Hospital intends to comply with the spirit and intent of the improvements that were contemplated in the original CUP approvals from 2015-2016, but seeks three modifications to the current conditions of approval in its CUPs: 1) elimination of improvements to perimeter block wall; 2) modification of facade improvements, pursuant to newly submitted plans, and 3) elimination of new lighting in the parking lot.

III. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT BACKGROUND
A. The 2015 and 2016 CUPS
On April 20, 2015, the Planning Commission approved Resolution No. PC 15-10, which approved Conditional Use Permit Case No. CU 15-02 ("CuP 15-0211), allowing a hospital facility within the M4 (Light Industrial) District and C -G (General Commercial) Zone. CUP 15- 02 is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.

On August 4, 2016, the Hospital filed an application for the modification of CUP 15-02, changing the type of care provided by the facility from combination behavioraUmedIV" l, to all -
behavioral, increasing the number of patient beds provided from 80 to 92, and adjusting the previously approved phasing plan ' for various site improvements to be implemented on the Property. On September 19, 2016, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC 1646, which approved Conditional Use Permit Case No. CU 16-05 ("CUP 16 -OS"), which made the modifications to CUP 15-02, and modified several of the conditions of approval. CUP 16-05 is attached hereto as Exhibit 2.

After CUP 16-05
was approved, the Hospital obtained relevant approvals from California's Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development! ("OSHPD") in connection with the change of the type of care from medical to all -behavioral. Also, plans were completed and the hospital went to bid for the project. However, when the bids were received, it became apparent that the Hospital's original budget and estimates for the work were well below the real costs it would take to actually perform the construction. The major work associated with increasing the number of hospital beds, and the related improvements needed to effectuate the change from 1 OSHPD is the California regulatory entity that specifically regulates and approves improvements that axe made to implement these types of changes. -23-

medical to behavioral rooms/Deus came out dramatically higher than the estimates that were originally obtained.

Moreover, there were several improvements that were required in the conditions of approval, relating to 1) a perimeter block wall, 2) fagade improvements, and 3) lighting improvements, that amount to millions of additional dollars in costs. The cost figures eclipsed the Hospital's budget for the original project contemplated by CUP 16-05, which prompted the Hospital to meet with Planning Division staff on January 17, 2019 to discuss potential solutions.

B. The Hospital Submits a CUP Modification Application which is later Withdrawn After Hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council At the January 17, 2019 meeting with the Planning Division, the Hospital explained that in order to be able to proceed with the project, it would need to modify and eliminate some of the requirements from the conditions of approval in CUP 16-05. It was determined that a CUP Amendment Application would need to be submitted in order to modify any of the conditions of approval, and certain items (such as a noise -study, and a new proposal/plan as to what changes the Hospital wishes to make to the fagade) would need to be completed.

On May 23, 2019, the Hospital submitted a CUP Modification Application (CUP Case No. CU 22-05), explaining that the Hospital intends to beautify the hospital through changes to the fh9ade, landscaping, and signage, and still intends to make improvements relating to access and ADA accessibility, but sought modification of conditions of approval principally relating to the block wall and fagade. The application was ultimately considered at Planning Commission hearings on June 20, 2022 and July 5, 2022, and a City Council hearing on July 11, 2022.

On July 12; 2022, the Hospital withdrew CUP Case No. CU 22-05, so that the Hospital could make changes to the facade plans, principally, to accommodate design -related comments relating to the fagade from Planning Commissioners and City Councilmembers at the June 20, July 5, and July I 1 hearings, and resubmit a new CUP Modification application directly to the City Council as the planning body.

C. The Hospital Works with City Regarding New CUP Modification Application to Be Submitted Directly to City Council
Code enforcement action had been put on hold while CUP Case No, CU 22-05 was being
processed, but upon withdrawal, the City took action to enforce the existing CUPs. On July 12, 2022 (the same day that CUP Case No. CU 22-05 was withdrawn), the City issued a Notice of Violation and Corrective Action regarding the Hospital's failure to comply with certain Conditions of Approval that were imposed by the City in the 2015/2016 CUPs. Pursuant to the NOV, the "following exterior improvements pursuant to the Conditions of Approval have not been completed per Resolution Nos. PC 1540 and PC 1646: 1) Exterior improvements consisting of building facade remodeling, complete landscaping; installation of lighting, and construction of perimeter block walls, 2) the installation of decorative stamped concrete along the first 10'4' of each driveway entrance and architecturally compatible with the proposed building remodel, 3) upgraded permanent decorative trash cans and outdoor furniture affixed to

the ground, 4) decorative bicycle racks, and 5) upgrade four existing drive approaches serving the property."
On August 23, 2022, representatives from the City, and representatives from the Hospital met at the Property to conduct a site visit, and to observe any additional conditions at the Property that should be incorporated into the Hospital's improvement plans. On August 30, 2022, the City sent to the Hospital an email, and an additional list of items on the Property that require corrective action. The Hospital has taken corrective action on most of the outstanding code enforcement items, and provided proof of same to the City in emails dated September 8, 2022 and September 27, 2022. Any code enforcement items that remain outstanding at the Property will be handled in conjunction with this new CUP application.

The Hospital now submits this CtJP Modification Application, to be considered directly by the City Council as the planning body, and seeks: 1) elimination of improvements to perimeter block wall; 2) simplification of fagade improvements, pursuant to newly submitted plans, and 3) elimination of lighting in the parking lot.

IV. ELIMINATION 4F PERIMETER BLOCK WALL (CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL # 15, 17, 18, 199 22 To CUP 16-05)
The original requirement for the perimeter block wall in CUP 15-02 was to replace the existing 6400t high block wall surrounding the entire Property with an 8400t high block wall surrounding the entire property. The intent of the requirement was presumably to protect adjacent neighbors from noise in the parking lot. Importantly, this change to an 8400t high block wall requires complete demolition of the existing wall, and construction of a new wall with new footings, etc. This is project, as contemplated in CUP 15-02, would cost approximately $1.4 million dollars in and of itself.

It should be noted that when CUP 16 -OS modified CUP 15-02, it already included a reduction in scope of the original block wall requirement. As explained in the staff report for the September 19, 2016 meeting, and fully supported by staff at the time, CUP 16-05 modified that requirement so that a portion of the wall could be left at 64eet in height, as reflected in the modified condition of approval number 17: "The existing perimeter wall located on the northwest portion of the property directly adjacent to the apartment building may be maintained as is at 6'-0" in height."
The Applicant is now requesting that the entire block wall improvement requirement be eliminated from the conditions of approval. This is because the increase in height of the block wall is totally unnecessary, and will accomplish nothing, and the current block wall is in good condition, both structurally and visually. Some portions of the wall have sustained minimal damage, and the Hospital is committed to fixing those portions. There are two main reasons why there is no need for the increase in wall height.
-25-

1) Because the Hospital's use has been changed to behavioral health only, there are no longer any emergency services, no oxygen tanks (and related deliveries), and essentially none of the prior noise -generating activities that the previous hospital use had in place are currently operative. As such, the general noise levels at the Hospital are low. There have been no recent complaints from neighbors regarding noise.
2) Behavioral health patients typically do not drive, and do not have many visitors. This was addressed throughout the approval process for CUP 16-05. As such, the number of cars and traffic that is generated by the new use is substantially lower than the prior hospital operation, which correspondingly generates less noise as well.

Pursuant to the Planning Department's request, the Hospital conducted a supplemental noise study to analyze whether the change from a 6 foot block wall to an 8 foot block wall would make any difference. The study, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 3, concluded that the change in noise levels would be minimal, and that even with the 6 foot block wall, there would be no noise impacts on surrounding properties and development.

Some neighbors living adjacent to the Property have also been contacted by Hospital representatives, and have submitted signed declarations (prepared by the Hospital, and discussed with each neighbor at a meeting), explaining that they would prefer no additional changes to the block wall. Some of these declarations have been provided in Exhibit 4, but the Hospital expects to meet with additional neighbors, and will supplement this application with additional declarations prior to the hearing date.

Therefore, the Hospital requests, through this CUP Amendment Application, that alI requirements relating to the block wall (including, but not limited to, those contained in conditions of approval 15, 17, 18, 19, and 22), be eliminated entirely.2 V. MODIFICATIONS TO FAA.DE (CONDITION OF APPROVAL 44
15 TO CUP lfi-OS)
The Hospital will improve the facade of the building, improve signage, improve landscaping, and beautify the street. The newly proposed facade and signage improvements are being submitted concurrently with this Application, and/or will be provided on or before October 31, 2022.

Through the implementation of the changes proposed in this CUP Modification request, the exterior of the building, and the signage throughout the Property, will be significantly modified and improved. New plans and renderings are being included with this modified application, to show the proposed changes to the fagade.

The original plan submitted with CUP 16-05
would have required major structural changes to the
building with excessive costs (over $2.2 million). The Hospital's new proposal makes significant cosmetic improvements to the site, could be performed at a much faster rate, and at a much lower price point. The improvements that the Hospital intends to incorporate in the beautification of the z There are also wall -related conditions of approval in CUP 15-02, but those were modified through CUP 16-05. To the extent that the conditions of approval in CUP 15-02 are still considered operative, the Hospital also requests that those conditions be removed (including, but not limited to conditions of approval 17, 25, 26, 27, and 74). -26-

building and fagade, and making improvements to access and ADA accessibility. In the spirit of the originally approved CUP 15-02 (Exhibit 1), and its subsequent modification through CUP 16-05 (Exhibit 2), the new proposal fulfills the ultimate goal of beautifying the fagade of the Hospital substantially.

VI. ELCNllNATION OF LIGHTING RCQUIRCNIENTS (CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL #35, 365 4$ TO CUP 15-02)
There are three conditions of approval in CUP 15-02 that require signif cant lighting changes in the parking lot of the Hospital. However, it appears that when the original plans from 2015 were drawn up, they did not take into consideration the four existing light poles (operated by Edison).

The base of these four light poles are located directly outside the perimeter block wall surrounding the Hospital parking lot, but lights themselves protrude over the perimeter block wall, and directly onto the Hospital parking lot, as shown below:
_27_

_ �MEL A al
aam
,t';�,
�sampaw
�' t' _
ar
s`� '
�-"• ,,
yc S�isr �e�.r� I. } i
' ga. { r
laa
jam I
so
.`�• )iyi `a*k'"4`""y � Vt
NOT a
fWN Or a.
gala,.���Ob =4_C 1 - -- Val
-'�s
Al
or l Vd am.
�.. r rJ + - L - r -MIL
-
IF
�� 'SMC o
01 ry"
T , rJ _. Lam,,-aff ,
00 a at
tfi Lrr yr'MEN
L 01
a �O�Ftf Ila 14
slaaaa al.
tia
aT
OF, law
044N, I
a.:
ot to
40 al
ON a
0411. ANN
a am aa: 411011L tc-f
�.i.
all

Fage 7 of 9
VII. PROPOSED FINDINGS
Pursuant to Municipal Code section 17.96.040, the Planning Commission must be satisfied that the below 4 conditions are met prior to granting the CUP. Each of these findings are discussed below. Note that these findings were already made in connection with both CUP 15-02 and CUP 16-05. The below proposed findings also explain how this proposed modification would affect those findings, if at all.

A. The use applied for at the location set forth in the application is properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit or Minor Use Permit is authorized by this title.

The use applied for at the location set forth in the application is properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized, in that pursuant to Bellflower Municipal Code subsection

17.44.030.A.35 and 17.52.030, a Conditional Use Permit is required in the C -G (General Commercial) zone and the M-1 (Light Industrial) District for a Hospital use.

The site is currently developed as a hospital, and CUP 16 -OS only proposed to change the type of care provided, the number of patient beds, and the phasing plan for the implementation of various required s41 ite improvements.

This application, which seeks to modify the conditions of approval of CUP 16-05, does not affect the fact that the underlying CUP hospital use is properly authorized by the Bellflower Municipal Code.

B. The said use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community, is in harmony with the various elements or objectives of the Master Plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the district in which the proposed use is to be located.

The said use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community, is in harmony with thC; various elements or objectives of the Master Plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the district in which the site is located. The proposed hospital use is consistent with Goal 2, Policies 2.2, 2.8 and 2.11 of the General Plan, which state that the City should provide commercial facilities to meet the retail and service needs of the community, encourage rehabilitation or redevelopment or designated commercial and industrial areas, and retain industries now in Bellflower. The hospital is necessary or desirable for the development of fihe community as it will provide essential medical services to the community.

The proposed modificati
ons also include design features and operational characteristics that will help integrate it into the surrounding community and not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the district. Additionally, a Noise Assessment was previously conducted as part of CUP 15-02, which concluded that there will be no noise impact to the surrounding area. The Applicant has submitted a Noise Assessment aowi ddendum shng that
there is still no noise impact, despite the modification of some of the conditions of approval. -29-

C. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping and other features that may be required in order to adjust said use to those existing or possible future uses of land in the neighborhood.

The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, and other features that may be required in order to adjust said use to those existing or possible future uses of land in the neighborhood in that, based on the maximum occupancy of 92 hospital beds and a maximum employee count of 82 during any one shift, the site provides adequate parking onsite. The modification of certain conditions of approval includes the elimination of the proposed modification to a perimeter block wall and lighting, which will reduce the construction burden (and related noise and nuisance) on neighboring properties.

D. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways properly designed and improved so as to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated or to be generated by the proposed use.

The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways properly designed and improved so as to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated or to be generated by the proposed use, because a Traffic Assessment was previously prepared for the project which concluded that the study intersections and street levels of service would not be impacted by the project as initially proposed. An updated analysis was provided to address the increase in the number of patient beds proposed in CUP 16-05, and is consistent with the previous determination. The City Traffic Engineer determined that the conclusions were accurate and that the streets and highways would continue to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the proposed use with no issues.

The modifications in CUP 16-05 relating to type of care provided, and an increase in the number of patient beds from 80 to 92 and maximum number of staff from 80 to 82 are negligible, and should not create greater impacts on adjacent streets and highways. The Applicant submitted a data -driven report with CUP 16-05 demonstrating that the shift to all -behavioral type of care would even reduce the number of trips generated to the facility, due to a lower rate of visitation for patients associated with behavioral care versus acute medical care. None of the modifications to the conditions of approval herein effect traffic or parking issues.

VIII. CEQA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION: NO UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES EXIST WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT OR PROJECT SITE.

The project is categorically exempt fr
om the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA} pursuant to 14 California Code of Regulations § 15301 as a Class 1 categorical exemption (Existing Facilities) and § 15311 (Accessory Structures) and § 15332 (In - Fill Development Projects}. This project is not anticipated to .have any significant impacts with regard to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. CUP 16-05 involved a negligible expansion of an existing use, in that the facility is proposing to shift from combination behavioral/medical to all -behavioral care, and add a total of twelve (12) beds to its existing operation. The proposed modifications to certain conditions of approval will not create any additional impacts. -30-

EXHIBIT LIST

1. CUP 15-02

2. CUP 16 -OS

3. Noise Study

4. Declarations from Neighbors Regarding Lighting and Block email -31-

-32-

CITY OF BELLFLOWER
RESOLUTION NO. PC 15-10

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BELLFLOWER APPROVING CONDITIONAL.

USE PERMIT CASE NO. CU 15-02 TO ALLOW FOR A
HOSPITAL FACILITY WITHIN THE M-1 (LIGHT

INDUSTRIAL) DISTRICT AND THE C -G (GENERAL
COMMERCIAL} ZONE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT
9542 ARTESIA BOULEVARD; APPLICANT: SHELLE

MALIUI ON BEHALF OF LOS ANGELES ALTA HOSPITAL,
INC.

WHEREAS, the applicant, Shelle Malm on behalf of Los Angeles Alta Hospital Inc., is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow hospital facility within the M-1 (Light Industrial) District and C -G (General Commercia{) done located at 9542 Artesia Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, it is the purpose of the Zoning Ordinance to encourage the most appropriate use of the land; to conserve and stabilize the value of property; and to promote public peace, health, safety, and general welfare, all in accordance with the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan contains policies to organize land uses to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent land .uses; and
WHEREAS, an environmental assessment has been conducted for this project in comp}lance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This project has been determined to be Categorically Exempt per Article 19 Section 15301, Class 1, Section 15302, Class 2, and Section 15332, Class 32 from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, notice of the mentioned hearing was duly given and published in the time, form, and manner as required by law; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held before the Planning Commission on April 20, 2014.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE GITY OF BELLFLOWER, AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Bellflower does hereby find; determine, and declare as follows:

1. That the use applied far at the location set forth in'the application is properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized by this chapter in that pursuant to Bellflower Municipal Code subsection 17.44.030 A. 35. and

17.52.030, a conditional Use Permit is required in the C -G {General Commercial) zone and the M-1 (Light Industrial) District.

—33—

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. PC 1540
"age 2of9

2. That the said use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community, is in harmony with the various elements or objectives of the Master Plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the district in which the proposed use is to be located in that the proposed hospital is consistent with Goal 1, Policy 1.1, Goal 2, Policies 2.8 and 2.11 of the City's General Plan. The proposed hospital is necessary or desirable for the development of the community as it will provide essential medical services to the community. The proposed hospital also includes design features, such as sound attenuation elements and operational characteristics that will help integrate it into the surrounding community and not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the district. In addition a Noise Assessment was conducted for the proposed project and concludes that there will be no noise impact to the surrounding area.

3. That the site for the intended use. is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping and other features that may be required in order to adjust said use to those existing or possible future uses of land in the neighborhood in that based on the maximum occupancy of 80 hospital beds and a maximum employee count of 80 during any one shift, the site provides adequate parking on-site. The project also incorporates new perimeter fencing, additional landscaping, and parking lot improvements that will enhance the subject site.

4. That the site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways properly designed and improved so as to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated or to be generated by the proposed use in that a Traffic Assessment was prepared for the project and concluded that the study intersections and street levels of service would not be impacted by the proposed project. In addition, the City Traffic Engineer has determined that the Traffic Assessments conclusions are accurate and the streets and highways will continue to cant' the type and quantity of traffic generated by the proposed use with no issues.

SECTION 2. Based on the above findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit Case No. CU 15-02 for said property subject to the following conditions.

Standard Conditions of Apurova!

1. The subject property shall be developed andlor used in the manner requested and shall be in substantial conformity with the submitted plans date-stamped April 13, 2015, unless revisions and/or additional conditions are specifically required herein.

2. The applicant and its successors in interest shall indemnify, protect, defend (with legal counsel reasonably acceptable to the City), and hold harmless, the City, and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all liabilities, claims, actions, causes of action, proceedings, suits, damages, judgments, liens, levies, costs, and expenses of whatever nature, including reasonable attorney's fees and disbursements (collectively "Claims") arising out of or in any way relating to this project, any discretionary approvals granted by the City related to the development of the project or the environmental review -34-

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. PC '15-10

conducted under California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Section 2'1000 et seq., for the project. If the City Attorney is required to enforce any conditions of approval, all costs, including attorney's fees, shall be paid for by the applicant.

3. The action of the Planning Commission on any such Conditional Use Permit shall be Fina! and effective within ten (10) days following final action thereon.

Provided, however, that if within such ten (10) day period an appeal in writing is filed with the application fee as established by City Council in the manner prescribed in Section 17.112 0#this chapter, the filing of said appeal within such time limit shall serve to hold in abeyance of the effective date of the Conditional Use Permit granted by the action of the Planning Commission until such time as the City Council, in the manner prescribed in .Section 17.112 hereof, shall have held a de novo public hearing on such appeal. The decision of City Council on such appeal shall be final and conclusive.

The applicant shall submit to the Planning Division an Affidavit in Agreement and Support thereof acknowledging
within thirty (30) days from the date
The Affidavit in Support form shall
Planning Division prior to any p
acceptance of the conditions of approval
ofi approval by the Planning Commission.
be signed, notarized and returned to the
an check submittal or building permit
application or implementation of the requested entitlement.

5. Decision is not effective until permittee acknowledges acceptance of any conditions and any appeal period has lapsed, or a waiver of right to appeal is filed or if there is an appeal, until a final decision has been made on the appeal. 6y use of entitlements granted by a development application, the applicant acknowledges agreement with conditions of approval.

6. All improvements within City jurisdiction to the subject property shall comply with all City Ordinances and shall conform #o all requirements of the California Building Code, as adopted by the City of Bellflower.

7. The subject property and its immediate surrounding shall be maintained neat and clean at all times. The subject property and its immediate surrounding shall be maintained free from debris and graffiti at all times. The property owner shall remove any debris or graffiti within 24 -hours upon notification by the City. Litter on the site and any litter scattered nearby properly, streets, and sidewalks shall be removed daily.

8. Anything which is not shown on application/pians, or which is not specifically approved, or which is not in compliance with this section, is not approved. Any application andlor plans which are defective as to, but not limited to, omissions, dimensions, scale, use, calors, materials, encroachments, easements, etc., shall render any entitlements granted by this section null and void. Construction (i# any) shall cease until all requirements of this section are complied with, Development entitlements may be withheld until Code violations are abated.

9. Failure to implement andlor maintain all provisions of these conditions shall be deemed to void this permit and revocation of said permit may occur following a public hearing ofi the approving body.
—35—

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. PC 15-10
Page4of9

10. The Conditional Use Permit issued shall terminate and become void unless:
a. The uses authorized by such permit shall LO by construction necessary and incident thereto on or before the time limit specified in such permit, and thereafter diligently advanced in accordance W1 h the phasing plan. In all cases, the Commission for good cause shown before the expiration of such time limit may extend such time limit once for a period of up to one year.
b. All uses shall be continuously operated for the use permitted. If said use ceases to exist for one hundred eighty (180) days or more it shall be deemed expired and void.

Planning

11. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval within DRB 5-14-5368 and Resolution No. PC 15-10 relative to Conditional Use Permit Case No. CU 15=02.

12. The proposed hospital shall be operated in a matter consistenfi with the business description date-stamped April 16, 2015.

13. The hospital shall have maximum patient bed occupancy of 80. Any increase in number of patient beds above. 80 shall require modification of the Conditional Use Permit Case No. 15-02.

14. The hospital shall have a maximum employee count of 80 at any one shift. Any increase in number of employees at any ane shift shall require modification of Conditional Use Permit Case No. 15-02.

15. The hospital shat! provide a minimum total of 178 of# street parking spaces on the subject sites.

16. The behavioral health services, pharmacy, dietary, medical records, and janitorial services shall be allowed to operate as part of phase 1 of the proposed project, which will commence operation on April 30, 2015.

17. Exterior improvements consisting building faced remodeling, installation of lighting, installation of signage, .construction of perimeter block walls, installation of landscaping, and parking lot improvements shall be completed on or before December 31, 2016.

18. The medical/surgical
services consisting of . laboratory, imaging, surgery,
intensive care, respiratory,
allowed to operate as part
rehabilitation, and urgent care shall operate shall be
of phase 2 of the proposed proj
or before July 31, 2018.
ect, which will be on

19. Expansion of the hospital's services to include emergency services will require modification of the Conditional Use Permit Case No. 15-02. A separate application and public hearing will be required.
-36 -

City of �eilflower
Resolution No. PC 15-10

20. No temporary trailers shall be allowed on the site, except the temporary oxygen trailer needed during construction of the permanent oxygen storage enclosure.

Upon completion of the permanent oxygen storage enclosure, but no later than May 31, 2016, all temporary trailers shall be removed from the site.

21. Security guards shall continuously monitor all parking lots and open areas.

22. Ail loading and unloading of deliveries to the hospital shall be prohibited along Artesia Boulevard, Ardmore Avenue, and Ramona Street. All deliveries shall take place on the designated loading spaces on the subject site.

23. The emergency generator shall be serviced/tested between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. only.

24. Decorative stamped concrete shall be incorporated along the first 10'-0" of each driveway entrance. Stamped concrete pattern and color shall be architecturally compatible with the proposed building remodel.

25. All new perimeter block walls shall be 8'-0" high as measured from frnished grade, except within the first 20'-0" of the property along any public right of way.

26. Ail new perimeter block walls shall incorporate decorative pilasters at even intervals and a decorative cap.

27. The Applicants/Property Owners shalt obtain the neighbors' consent, and approval in writing prior to conducting any work an walls located partly or entirely on the adjacent properties. Prior to the installation of any perimeter walls, the Applicants/Property Owners shall be responsible for contacting abutting property owners for potential removal of existing block walls and the construction of any new block walls.

28. A lot line adjustment shall be required in order to consolidate the internal lot line on property identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 7161-010-042.

29. A[l proposed exterior signage shall comply with the master sign pian dated April 13, 2015.

30. Copies of all State agency approvals shall be submitted to the Planning Division.

31. All requirements of the Los Angeles County Fire. Department shall be incorporated into the plans and complied with at all times.

32. A C&D Waste Management form is required to be completed, submitted, and approved prior to issuance of building permits for improvements done to buildings/structures within City of Bellflower jurisdiction.

33. Service for all utilities {including but not limited to the electrical service) must be of underground entry when the valua#ion of a project exceeds $50,000 to work being done to buildingslstructures within City of Bellflower jurisdiction. -37-

City of Bellflower
Resolution

No. PC 15-10

34. The applicant shall contact the City's trash hauler and obtain written letter describing the proposed method of service to the site.
zero -foot candle shall be incorporated along all property lines and adjacent to all public right -of --ways in order to prevent any light spill over onto the neighboring properties or the public right -of way. Perimeter lighting shall be shielded or hooded. A photometrics plan shall be submitted at the time of plan check.

36. All proposed light standards shall be decorative and consistent with the architectural design of the building, subject to review and approval by the Director of Planning or his designee prior to building permit issuance.

37. Vending machines, ATMs, payphones, andlor similar machines/devices are prohibited outside the building.

38. The decorative trash cans and outdoor furniture shall be permanently affixed to the ground.

39. The proposed bicycle racks shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning or his designee. All proposed bicycle racks shall be decorative.

40. The landscaping on-site shall be kept and maintained in good condition at all times.

41. Loitering is prohibited on or around the premises.

EngineeringlPublic Works

42. The site plan shall show the location and dimensions of all existing and proposed drive approaches.

43. The site plan shall show all existing right of way improvements.

44. Landscape and hardscape improvements located within the 20 foot front yard setback shall not exceed 42" in height as measured from the paved driveway surface to ensure safe vehicular sight distance.

45. All existing drive approaches that do not access the propert y shall be
removed and replaced with full height curb and gutter, sidewalk, and parkway improvements consistent with existing, adjacent parkway improvements.

46. The site plan shall provide driveway dimensions at all angle points and any proposed radii. , .

47. The site plan shall dimension the location of the concrete wheel stops at the applicable parking stalls.

48. A photo metric;i
plan is required to demonstrate parking lot lighting distribution and intensity.
-38-

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. PC 15010

49. The site plan shall describe the operational characteristics of the proposed gate fronting Ramona Street.

50. All drive approaches shall be designated right turn in/right turn out only fronting Artesia Boulevard.

51. Parking stalls adjacent to wails or other physical impediments shall measure 10 feet in width.

52. The site plan shall dimension any proposed loading zone.

53. The site plan shall show the designated disabled access path from the public right of way.

54. The site plan shall show and dimension all property lines and any internal tot lines.

55. The site plan shall show and dimension all easements.

56. Fire Protection: This development may require construction of fire protection improvements. Prior, to the approval of any development plans the applicant is required to contact Los Angeles County Fire Department, Engineering Division, to obtain the fire flow and access requirements for any proposed development.

57. The applicant shall con#act the local Water Company to determine the existing fire flow rate in this area. If the existing fire flow capabilities are below the required minimum, the applicant shall provide the necessary means for meeting the fire flow rates required by the Fire Department, 1 58. The site plan shalt show how site drainage is to be addressed. The minimum slope on concrete flaw lines shall be 0.50%. Minimum slope on asphalt concrete or turf shall be 1.0%. Existing elevations of adjacent property and street flow lines must be shown around the perimeter of the proposed development. All applicable NPDES requirements shall be compiled .with.

59. The site plan shall show and dimension all existing and proposed perimeter wallslfences.

60. The site plan shall include typical sections at all side and rear property lines.

Said sections shall show the property line, perimeter walls/fences, adjacent building walls and roof overhangs with dimensions from property line to each feature described. Sections shall also show the perimeter wall/fence height measured on both sides of said wall/fence.

61. All existing drive approaches serving the property
do not comply with current
City or Americans with Disability Act (ADA) standards. Remove the existing drive approaches and construct new drive approaches in compliance with current City of Bellflower and ADA standards. Approximate field measurements are.
a. Fronting Artesia Blvd.
- 43'X9'
—39—

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. PC 1540

b. Fronting Ardmore Ave. - 38'X9'
c. Also fronting Ardmore Ave. -17'X9'
d. Fronting Ramona St. - 29'X9'

62. Curb and gutter shall be reconstructed to conform to all drive approach construction in accordance with City Standards, Note: Curb and gutter shall be monolithic.

63. The existing substandard disabled curb ramp located at the southwest corner of Artesia Blvd. at Ardmore Avenue shall be reconstructed in compliance with current City of Bellflower and ADA standards.

64. For any new sewer connections please contact the Los Angeles County Sanitation District and obtain any connection permits. Documentation of said permits shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of any building permits. Provide documentation from the District that sufficient sewer capacity is provided. A separate sewer demand analysis prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer may/is be required.

65. All utilities within the subject property shall be placed underground prior to building occupancy or sale, in accordance with the Bellflower Municipal Code.

66. Un -sodded, mounded planters adjacent to public sidewalk shall be provided with 6" curbs to prevent soil run-off onto the public sidewalk. Curbs are not required if the planter consists of sod.

67. The contractor shall meet with the City Public Works Inspector before starting any construction within the public right-of-way.

68. All work within the public right -of --way, including placing and removal of traffi c
control devices, shall be restricted to the hours between 8:30 A.ttll. and 3:30 P.M., Monday through Friday. No work requiring continuous inspection or traffic control shall be done on Saturday, Sunday or Holidays, unless prior arrangements have been made at least one week in advance with the approval of the City Engineer.

69. The developer, at hisfher cost, shall be responsible for the relocation as necessary of any public or private utility or other obstruction to facilitate the construction within the public right-of-way.

70. Permits are required for all work within the public right -of way.

71. All public works requirements shall be complied with and shall be identifed on the project plans.

Building

72. Submit documentation from OSHPD identifying approvals for the proposed hospital.

73. Any temporary structures will require City
Planning and Building &Safety
review and approval prior to installation.
—40—

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. PC 15-70

74. Structural design is required for all 8'•4" high block walls. Special inspections are also required for the wall.

75. The site plan shall identify all bollards on the si#e plan.

76. Los Angeles County Health Department approval is required for the proposed underground gas tanks.

77. Any improvements proposed to the free standing medical office requires City review and approval. Improvements shall comply with the 2013 California Building Codes.

Municipal NPEDS Requirements

78. The proposed project shall include Low Impact Development (LIQ} Best Management Practices.

Los Angeles County Fire Department

79. All Fire Department comments shall be complied.

SECTION 3. That the Secretary of the Planning Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolutian.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BELLFLOWER THIS 20TH DAY OF APRIL 2075.

ALAN GONIEZ, C
Attest:

AEL GUZMAN, SECRETA
Qo� 319155
—41—

-42-

CITY OF BELLFLOWER
RESOLUTION N0. PC 16-16
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMRAISSi4N
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. CU
1605 TO MODIFY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE
NO. CU 15-D2, WHICH ALLOWED A HOSPITAL FACILITY
WITHIN THE Alt -1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DISTRICT AND C-

G (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ZONE, BY CHANGING THE

TYPE OF CARE PROVIDED BY THE FACILITY FROM
COMBINATION BEHAVIORALfMEDICAL TO ALL

BEHAVIORAL, INCREASING THE NUMBER OF PATIENT
BEDS PROVIDED FROM 80 TO 92, AND ADJUSTING

THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PHASING PLAN FOR

VARIOUS SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE IMPLEMENTED,
ON � PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9542 ARTESIA
BOULEVARD. APPLICANT: HARVEY ROSS / LA

COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
The Planning Commission of the City of Bellflower does hereby resolve as follows:

SECTION 1. The Planning Commission finds as follows:

A. On August 4, 2016, -Harvey Ross / LA Community Hospital (the "Applicants) filed an application for the modefccation of Conditional Use Permit Case No. CU '15-02, which allowed a hospital facility wi#his the M-1 {Light Industrial) District and C -G (General Commercial) Zone, by changing the type of care provided by the facility from � combination behaviora!/medical to all -behavioral, increasing the number of patient beds provided from 80 to 92, and adjusting the previously approved phasing plan for various site improvements to be implemented, on property located at 9542 Artesia Boulevard;
B. Applicant's application was reviewed by the City for, in part, consistency with the General Pian and conformity with the Bellflower Municipal Code ("BMCs);
C. In addition, the City reviewed the project's environmental impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Cade §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA") and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regulations §§15000, et seq., the "CEQA Guidelines); D. The City completed its review and scheduled a public hearing regarding the application, before the Planning Comrirtission on September 19, 20'!6; E. � The Planning Commission opened the
testimony aril other evidence regarding
limitation, information provided to the
. t Applicant; and

public hearing to receive public
the application including, without
Planning Commission by the
-43-

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. PC 16=16

F. The Planning Commission considered the information provided by City staff, public testimony, and the Applicant. This Resolution, and its findings, is made based upon the evidence presented to the Planning Commission at its September 19, 2016 hearing including, without limitation, the staff report.

SECTION 2. Factual Findings and Conclusions. The Planning Commission finds that the following facts exist:

A. That the use applied for at the location set forth in the application is properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized by the Zoning Code in that a hospital is a conditionally permitted use in the C -G (General Commercial) Zone. The site is currently developed as a hospital, and the Applicant only proposes to change the type of care provided, the number of patient beds, and the phasing plan for the implementation of various required site improvements.

B. That the said use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community, is in harmony with the various elements or objectives of the Master Plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the district in which the site is located. The proposed CUP modification is consistent with Goal 2, Policies 2.2, 2.8 and 2.11 of the General Plan, which state that the City should provide commercial facilities to meet the retail and service needs of the community, encourage rehabilitation or redevelopment or designated commercial and industrial areas, and retain industries now in Bellflower. ' A condition of approval addressing maintaining adequate separation from the adjacent residential uses to protect the peace, privacy and general welfare of the residents has been included (Condition of Approval #17). Additionally, a Noise Assessment was previously conducted as part of Conditional Use Permit Case No. CU 15-02, which concluded that there will be no noise impact to the surrounding area.

C. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use, and for all the yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping, and other features that may be required in order to adjust said use to those existing or possible future uses of land in the neighborhood in that, based on the maximum occupancy of 92 hospital beds and a maximum employee count of 82 during any one shift, the site provides adequate parking onsite. The project also incorporates new perimeter fencing, additional landscaping, and parking lot improvements, all of which were approved as part of Conditional Use Permit Case No. CU 15-02 and some of which are hereby proposed to be modified, that will enhance,the subject site.
—44—

City of B®Ilflow®r
Resolu#ion Ido. PC '16-76

D. That #h® site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways properly designed and improved so as to carry the type and quantity of traffcc generated or to be generated by the proposed use in that a Traffic Assessment was previously prepared for the project which concluded that the study intersections and street levels of service would not be impacted by the project as initially proposed. An updated analysis has been provided to address the increase in the number of patient beds, and is consistent with the previous determination. The City Traffic Engineer • determined that the conclusions were accurate and that the streets and highways would continue to carry the type and quantify of #raffic generated by . the proposed use with no issues. The Applicant's proposed mod cations relating to type of care provided, and an 'increase in the number of patient beds from 80 to 92 and' maximum number of staff from 80 to 82 are negligible, and should not create greater impacts on adjacent streets and highways. The Applicant has submitted adata-driven report demonstrating that the shift to ail -behavioral type of care would even reduce the number of trips generated to the facility, due to a lower rate of visitation for patients . associated with behavioral care versus acute medical care.

SECTICN 3. Environmental Assessment. This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to 14 Califomia Code of Regulations § 15301 as a Class 1 categorical exemption (Existing Facilities). This project is not anticipated to have any significant impacts with regard to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The project involves a negligible expansion of an existing use, in that the facility is proposing to shift from combination behavioral/medical to all -behavioral care, and add a total of twelve (12}� beds to its existing operation.

SECTICN 4. Approval Subject to the conditions listed on the attached Exhibit A, which is incorporated into this Resolution by reference, the Planning Commission approves Conditional Use Permit Case No. CU 16,05.

SECTICN 5. This resolution does not affect any penalty, forteiture, or liability incurred before, or preclude prosecution and imposition of penalties for any violation occurring before, this Resolution's effective date. Any such amended part will remain in full force and effect for sustaining action or prosecuting violations occ�irring before the effective date of this Resolution.

SECTICN 6. If any part of this Resolution or its application is deemed invalid by' a court of competent jurisdiction, the Planning Commission intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Resolution are severable.
—45—

City of 13911flower
Resolufion No. PC 1646

SECTION 7. Reliance On Record Each and every one of the findings and determinations in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the Planning Commission i
Pln all resprects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole.

SECTION 8. Limifatians. The Planning Commission's analysis and evaluation of the project is based on the best information currently available. It is inevitable that in evaluating a project that absolute and* perfect knowledge of all possible aspects of the project will not exist. One of the major limitations on analysis of the project is the Planning Commission's lack of knowledge of future events. In all instances, best efforts have been made to form accurate assumptions. Somewhat related to this are the limitations on the city's ability to solve what are in effect regional, state, and national problems and issues. The City must work within the political framework within which it exists and with the limitations inherent in that framework.

SECTION 9. Effecfrve Rafe. This Resolution is the Planning Commission's final decision and will become effective 10 days following adoption of this resolution unless the action is appealed pursuant to BMC chapters 17.96 and 17.112.

SECTION 10. The Planning Commission Chairman, or presiding officer, is hereby authorized to affix his signature to this Resolution signifying its adoption by the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission Secretary, is directed to attest thereto.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING CQIViI1111SSION OF THE CITY OF BEL' !FLOWER THIS 19�' DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015.

Approved as to form:

DAVID KING, ASSIST
Attachment:

CITY ATTORNEY
Exhibit A --Conditions of Approval
—46—

CHAIRMAN

RESOLUTION NO. PC '1 fi-1 fi - EXHt6fT A

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The following conditions of approval are intended to modify Conditions of Approval nos. 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 20, 25, 26, 27, 29, 40, and 74, and delete Conditions of Approval nos. 18 and 76, since they are no longer applicable to the Applicant's proposal,. within Resolution No. PC 15-10, relative to Conditional Use Permit Case No. CU 15-02, previously approved by the Planning Commission on April 20, 2015. Except as otherwise modified by this Resolution, all other conditions of approval within Resolution No. PC 15-10 remain the same and in effect. In the event of a conflict, the more restrictive condition of approval will control.

1. The subject properly must be developed and/or used in the manner reques#ed and must be in substantial conformity with the submitted plans date-stamped . August 4, 2016, unless revisions andlor additional conditions are specifically required herein.

2. The applicant and its successors in interest must indemnify, protect, defend {with legal counsel reasonably acceptable to the City), and hold harmless, the City, and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any and ail liabilities, claims, actions, causes of action, proceedings, suits, damages, judgments, liens, levies, costs, and expenses of whatever nature, including reasonable aitomey's fees and disbursements {collectively "Claims") arising out of or in any way relating to this project, any discrefionary approvals granted by the City related to the development of the project or the environmental review conducted under California Environmental Cua((ty Act, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., for the project. if the City Attorney is required to enforce . any conditions of approval, all costs, including attorney's fees, must.be paid for 'by the applicant.

3. The action of the Planning Commission on any such Conditional Use Permit is final and effective within ten (10) days following final action thereon.' Provided, however, that if within such ten (1�0) day period an appeal in writing is filed with the application fee as established by City Council in the manner prescribed in Sec#ion 17.112 of this chapter, the filing of said appeal within such time limit will serve to hold in abeyance of the effective date of the Conditional Use Permit granted by the action of the Planning Commission until such time as the City Council, in the manner prescribed in Section 17.112 hereof, have held a de novo public hearing on such appeal. The decision of City Council on such appeal will be final ,and conclusive.

4. The applicant must submit to the Planning Division an Affidavit in Agreement and Support thereof acknowledging acceptance of the conditions of approval within #hirly {30) days from the date of approval by the Planning Commission.

The Affidavit in Support form must be signedT notarized and retumed� to the Planning Division prior to any plan check submittal ar building permit application or implementation of the requested anti#lament. "' � � .*

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. PC 16-16 — Exhibit•A

5. Decision is not effective until permittee acknowledges acceptance of any ' conditions and any appeal period has lapsed, or a waiver of right to appeal is filed or if there is an appeal, until a final decision has been made on the appeal.

By use of entitlements granted by a development application, the applicant acknowledges agreement with conditions of approval.

6. All improvements within City jurisdiction to the subject property must comply with all City Ordinances and must conform to all requirements of the California Building Code, as adopted by the City of Bellflower.

7. The subject property' and its immediate surrounding must be maintained neat and clean at all times. The subject property and its immediate surrounding must be maintained free from debris and graffiti at all times. The property owner must remove any debris or graffiti within 24 -hours upon notification by the City. Litter on the site and any litter scattered nearby property, streets, and sidewalks must be removed daily.

8. Anything which is not shown on application/plans, or which is not specifically approved, or which is not in compliance with this section, is not approved. Any application and/or plans which are defective as to, but not limited to, omissions, dimensions, scale, use, colors, materials, encroachments, easements, etc., will render any, entitlements granted by this section null and void. Construction (if any) must cease until all requirements of this section are complied with.

Development entitlements may be withheld until Code violations are abated.

9. Failure to implement and/or maintain all provisions of these conditions will be
deemed to void this permit and revocation of said permit may occur following a public hearing of the approving body.

10. The Conditional Use Permit issued will terminate and become void unless:
a. The uses authorized by such permit will be commenced by construction necessary and incident there#o on or before the time limit specified in such permit, and thereafter diligently advanced in accordance with the phasing plan. In all cases, the Commission for good cause shown before the expiration of such time limit may extend such time limit once for a period of up to one year.
b. All uses must be continuously operated for the use permitted. If said use ceases to exist for one hundred eighty (180) days or more it will be deemed expired and void.

Planning
" 11. The proposed hospital must be operated in a manner consistent with the business description date-stamprrd August 4, 2016.

12. The
hospital must not exceed the maximum patient bed occupancy of 92. Any increase in number of patient beds above 9Z will require modification of Conditional Use Permit Case No. CU 16-05.
—4,g—

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. PG

76-1G -- Exhibit A .

13. The hospital must not exceed the maximum employee count of 82 at any one shift. Any increase in number of employees at any one shift will require modifica#ion of Conditional Use Permit Case No. CU 16-05.

14. The hospital must provide a minimum of 192 off-street parking spaces on the subject site.

15. Exterior improvements consisting of building facade remodeling, installation of fighting, installation of signage, construction of per(meter block walls, installation of landscaping, and parking !ot improvements must be completed on or before December 31, 2018.

16. No temporary trailers are allowed on the site, except in emergency circumstances, and as needed during construction of the project per the .submitted plans dated August 4, 2016, provided the Applicant notif(es and obtains approve! from Planning staff and that the temporary trailers are utilized in accordance with this condition.

17.. A(I new perimeter block walls must be 8'-0" high as measured from finished grade, except within the first ZO'-0" of the property, measured from any public righ# of way. The existing perimeter wall located on the northwest portion of the property directly adjacent to the apartment building may be maintained as is at 6'-0" in height.

18. All new ar modified perimeter block walls must inc®rp®rate degorative pilasters at even intervals and a decorative cap.

19. The ApplicantsfProperty owners must obtain the ne(ghbors' consent and approval in writing prior to conducting any work on walls located partly or entirely on the adjacent properties. Pr(or to the installation of any perimeter walls, the Applicants/Property' Qwners are responsible far contacting abutting property owners far potential remove( of existing block walls and the construction of any new block walls. In the event that the adjacent property owners decline to consent or fail to respond to a written request for consent, the City wil! work with the Applicant to develop and expeditiously review modifed site plans for construction of the wall. In no event will Applicant be deemed to �. be in non-compliance with this Condition or with this CUP if a neighbor withholds consent and Applicant cannot as a result modify the wall as otherwise required by this Condition.

20. Alf proposed exterior signage must comply with .the master sign plan dated August 4, 2016, subject to minor mod cations to the Applicant's corporate Logo, if necessary. � '

21. The landscaping on-site must be kept and maintained in good condition at all times, All proposed landscaping must comply with the Californ(a tl�odel Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.
—49—

City of Bellflower
Resolution No: PG 9646 — Exhibit A

Building

22. Structural design is required for all new or modified walls above 6'-0" in height.
—50—

t
1 -51-

To: Seena Max Samimi1 sxs�jmbm.com
From: Alava DeLoach, [email protected]
Date: 15 Ma rch 2019, Revised 17 April 2019
Memorandum
Subject: Bellflower Medical Center Project— CU 16-05 Noise Assessment Addendum Seena: we are pleased to submit this addendum to the prior Noise Assessment (prepared by AECOM, March 2015) for the Bellflower Medical Center project, located at 9542 East Artesia Boulevard in Bellflower, CA. As we understand it, the current Conditional Use Permit for the Medical Center (CU 16- 05) allows for increasing the number of patient beds provided from 80 to 92 and allows for adjustments in the previously approved phasing plan for various site improvements to be
implemented. This addendum includes the following two items: 1) analysis of potential traffic noise impacts due to the increase in beds, and 2) evaluating the necessity of increasing the height of the existing 6 -foot high perimeter wall.

Traffic Noise Assessment Due to Increase in Beds
Section 4.0 Traffic Noise in the previous noise assessment analyzed changes in traffic noise level, due to the reduction in beds from 144 to 80, using the developed average daily traffic (ADT) volumes for several roadways near the Medical Center. The prior assessment (Table 2) concluded that traffic noise levels would reduce by as much as 1 dB at Ardmore Avenue, south of Artesia Boulevard, and would remain unchanged at all other roadways adjacent to the project. An excerpt from Table 1; shows the ADT volumes for Ardmore Avenue, south of Artesia Boulevard, closest to noise sensitive residential receptors directly adjacent to the project site.
2015 Noise Assessment Table 1 (excerpt): Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Volumes by Alternative Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Volumes
Roadway/Segment
Existing + Previous
VIBkASUF
Hospital
Medical Center
Ardmore Avenue, South of Artesia Blvd
4,850
31990
To: Seena Max Samimi1 sxs�jmbm.com
From: Alava DeLoach, [email protected]
Date: 15 Ma rch 2019, Revised 17 April 2019
Memorandum
Subject: Bellflower Medical Center Project— CU 16-05 Noise Assessment Addendum Seena: we are pleased to submit this addendum to the prior Noise Assessment (prepared by AECOM, March 2015) for the Bellflower Medical Center project, located at 9542 East Artesia Boulevard in Bellflower, CA. As we understand it, the current Conditional Use Permit for the Medical Center (CU 16- 05) allows for increasing the number of patient beds provided from 80 to 92 and allows for adjustments in the previously approved phasing plan for various site improvements to be
implemented. This addendum includes the following two items: 1) analysis of potential traffic noise impacts due to the increase in beds, and 2) evaluating the necessity of increasing the height of the existing 6 -foot high perimeter wall.

Traffic Noise Assessment Due to Increase in Beds
Section 4.0 Traffic Noise in the previous noise assessment analyzed changes in traffic noise level, due to the reduction in beds from 144 to 80, using the developed average daily traffic (ADT) volumes for several roadways near the Medical Center. The prior assessment (Table 2) concluded that traffic noise levels would reduce by as much as 1 dB at Ardmore Avenue, south of Artesia Boulevard, and would remain unchanged at all other roadways adjacent to the project. An excerpt from Table 1; shows the ADT volumes for Ardmore Avenue, south of Artesia Boulevard, closest to noise sensitive residential receptors directly adjacent to the project site.
2015 Noise Assessment Table 1 (excerpt): Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Volumes by Alternative As seen in the table above, the reduction of patient beds from 144 to 80 corresponded to a reduction in ADT by 860, approximately 13 ADT per hed. Based on this ratio, we estimate that increasing the beds from 80 to 92 would result in an increase in ADT of approximately 160 trips (from 3,990 to 4,150). This increase would not raise traffic noise levels at Ardmore Avenue or at any other of the roadways adjacent to the project. As a result, increasing the facility beds from 80 to 92 would result in no noise impact.
-52-
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Volumes
Roadway/Segment
Existing + Previous
Existing + Proposed
Hospital
Medical Center
Ardmore Avenue, South of Artesia Blvd
4,850
31990
As seen in the table above, the reduction of patient beds from 144 to 80 corresponded to a reduction in ADT by 860, approximately 13 ADT per hed. Based on this ratio, we estimate that increasing the beds from 80 to 92 would result in an increase in ADT of approximately 160 trips (from 3,990 to 4,150). This increase would not raise traffic noise levels at Ardmore Avenue or at any other of the roadways adjacent to the project. As a result, increasing the facility beds from 80 to 92 would result in no noise impact.
-52-

Evaluating the Necessity of Increasing the freight of the Exis�cing Perimeter UUall The prior noise assessment estimated that an increase in wall height from 6 to 8 feet should result in a reduction in noise from activities within the parking area of the facility by 1 to 4 decibels. It is widely acknowledged (U.S. EPA, CPUC, Cowan, others) that a 3 decibel change in environmental noise levels is the minimum change that is perceptible and recognizable to the human ear. Therefore, increasing the wall height would not result in a significant reduction in noise from parking lot activity.

Moreover, the prior noise assessment assumed that existing conditions, including the existing 6 -foot high perimeter wall and larger number of beds, were already compliant with the City of Bellflower exterior noise level standards. As shown above, increasing the beds from 80 to 92 would result in no noise impact; increasing the height of the existing wall is not required for the project to remain in compliance with the City of Bellflower Noise Element. Therefore, keeping the existing perimeter wall at 6 -feet high would result in no noise impact.

Please feel free to call or write with any questions or comments; our contact information is below.

Best regards,
Alana DeLoach, Vibrasure
-53-
`�%
Alana DeLoach, Vibrasure
-53-

-54-

To the City of Bellflower:
1 am a resident of the City of Bellflower, and live adjacent to the Bellflower Hospital parking lot. For the last few years, l have noticed that there is a lot less noise and activity coming from the Bellflower Hospital parking lot. This has been a noticeable change from the prior operation of the full-service hospital that was there previously.

Bellflower Hospital representatives have informed me that the City of Bellflower may require additional lighting to be installed in the Bellflower Hospital parking lot in conjunction with upcoming rnodiflcations to the Hospital facade. l want the City of Bellflower to know that !strongly oppose the installation of any additional lights orlighting on the Bellflower Hospital parking lot.1 support the Bellflower Hospital's efforts to beautify the facade of the hospital, but that plan should not include any changes to the lighting, because new lighting will cause a nuisance, and will be disruptive, and wilt negatively impact my quality of life.

Also, t oppose any construction to expand the size or height of the block wall that surrounds the parking tot Because the parking lot is generally quiet, we see no reason to make any changes.

Thank you for taking this into
as you make your decision.

Soy residents de !a Ciudad de Bellflower y vivo junto al estacionamiento de! Hospital Bellflower. Durance los irltimos an"os, he notado que hay macho menos ruido y actividad provenience de! estacionamlento del Hospital Bellflower. Este ho silo un cambio notable con respecto a la operation anterior del hospital de servicio completo que estaba alli anteriormente.

Los representantes del Hospital Bellflower me hon informado que la Ciudad de Bellflower puede requerir que se instals iluminacidn adiciona! en el estacionamiento del Hospital junta con las proximal modifrcaciones a la fachada del Hospital. Quiera que la Ciudad de Bellflower sepa que me opongo firmemente o la instalacion de lutes o iluminaeion adicionales en el estacionamiento del Hospital Bellflower. Apoyo los esfuerzos del Hospital para embellecer la fachada del hospital, Pero ese plan no debe incluir ningun cambio en la iluminacion, porque la nueva iluminacion causara una molestia, y sera perjudicial, a impactara negativamente mi calidad de vida.

Ademas, me opongo a cualquier construction para ampliar el taman"o 01a al cora del mato de bloques que rodeo el estacionamienta. Debido a que el estacionamiento generalmente esta tranquilo, no vemos ninguna razors para hater cambios.

Gracias pot tomar est�,,�en. cuenta q/`tomar su decision.

Signature:

Printed Name:

Address:

Dare:
o�
-55-

To Me City of Bellflower:
1 am a resident of the City of Bellflower, and Jive adjacent to the Bellflower Nosplcal parking lot. For the last few years, I have noticed that there is a lot less noise and activity coming from the Bellflower Hospital parking lot. This has been a noticeable change from the prior operation of the full-service hospital that was there previously.

Bellflower Hospital representatives have Informed me that the City of Bellflawer may require additional lighting to be installed in the Bellflower Hospital parking lot in conjunction with upcoming modifications to the Hospital fagade. l want the City of Bellflower to know that 1 strongly oppose the installation of any additional lights or lighting on the Bellflower Hospital parking lot. 1 support the Bellflower Hospital's efforts to beautify the fagade of the hospital, but that plan should not include any changes to the lighting, because new lighting will cause a nuisance, and will be disruptive, and will negatively impact my quality of life.

Also, 1 oppose any construction to expand the size or helghc of the block wall that surrounds the parking at. Because the parking lot is generally quiet, we see no reason to make any changes.

Thank you for taking this into consideration as you make your decision.

Soy residence de la Ciudad de Bellflower y vivo junto al estacionamienta de! Hospital Bellflower. Durance los ultimos anos, he notado que hay macho menos ruido y actividad proveniente del estacfonamiento del Nospita! Bellflower. Este ha sido un cambia notable con respecto a la operation anterior del hospital de servicio completo que estaba all! anteriormente.

Los representantes del Hospital Bellflower me hon informado que to Ciudad de Bellflower puede requerir que se instate ilurrrinacion adiclona! en el estaclonamlenta del Hospitaf junto con las proximas modiflcaciones a la fachada del Hospital. Qulero que la Ciudad de Bellflower sepa que me opongo firmemente a la instalaclon de luces o iluminacion adicionales en el estacionamienta del Hospit6l Bellflower. Apoyo los esfuerzos del Hospital para embellecer la fachada del hospital, pero ese plan no debe incluir ningun cambio en la iluminacion, porque la nueva iluminacion causara una molestia, y ser6 perjudicial, a impactara negativamente mi calidad de vida.

Adem6s, me opongo a cualquler construction para ampliar el tamano o la altars del mora de bloques que rodeo el estacionamienta. Debido o que ei estacionamienta generaimente esta tranquilo, no vemas ninguna razon para hater camblos.

Grottos par tornar esto en Cuenca al tomar su decision.

Signature:

Printed Name:

Address:
sate
-56-
� 3 � a'2-

To the City of Bellflower:

I am a resident of the Clty of Bellflower, and live adjacent to the Bellflower Hospital parking lot For the last few years, l have noticed that there is a tot less noise and activity coming from the Bellflower Hospital parking lot. This has been a noticeable change from the prior operation of the full-service hospital that was there previously.

Bellflower Hospital representatives have informed me that the City of Bellflower may require additional lighting to be installed in the Bellflower Hospitol parking lot in conjunction with upcoming modifications to the Hospital facade. 1 want the City of Bellflower to know that 1 strongly oppose the installation of any additional lights or lighting on the Bellflower Hospital parking lot. l support the Bellflower Hospital's efforts to beautify the facade of the hospital, but that plan should not include any changes to the lighting, because new lighting will cause a nuisance, and will be disruptive, and will negatively impact my quality of life.

Also, !oppose any construction to expand the size or height of the block wall that surrounds the parking lot Because the parking lot is generally quiet, we see no reason to make any changes., Thank you for taking this into consideration as you make your decision.

Soy residence de la Ciudad de Bellflower y vivo junto a! estacionamtento del Hospital Bellflower. Durance los ciftimos anos, he notado que hay macho menos ruido y acrividad provenience del estacionamiento del Hospital Bellflower. Este ha sido un eambio notable can respecto a la operacian anterior del hospital de servtcio completo que estaba alli anteriormente:

Los represe�tantes de! Hospital Bellflower me hon informado que !a Ciudad de eel�ower puede requerir que se instate iluminacion adicional en e! estacionamiento de! Hospital junto con los praximas modif<caciones a la fachada del Hospital. Quiero que la Ciudad de Bellflower sepa que me opongo firmemente a la instalacian de laces o iluminaci6n adicionales en e! estacionamtento del Hospital Bellflower. Apoyo los esfuerzos del Hospital para embe!lecer la fachada del hospital, pero ese plan no debe inclutr ningun cambio en la iluminacion, porque la nueva iluminacion causara una molestia, y sera perjudicial, a tmpactara negativamente mi caltdad de vide.

Ademas, me opongo o cualquier construccian para emptier el tamano o la altura del muco de bloques que rodeo el escacionamiento. Debido a que el estacionamiento generalmente este tranquilo, no vernos ninguna ratan para hater cambios.

Gracias poi tamer esto en Cuenca aJ tomer su decistan.

Signature:

Printed tVame:

Address:

Date:
'a/2�
-57-

To the City of Bellflower:
! am a resident of the City of Bellflower, and live adjacent to the Bellflower Hospital parking lot. For the last few years, i have noticed that there is a lot less noise and activity coming from the Bellflower Hospital parking lot. This has been a noticeable change from the prior operation of the full-service hospital that was there previously.

Bellflower Hospital representatives have informed me that the City of Bellflower may require additional lighting to be installed in the Bellflower Hospital parking lot in conjunction with upcoming modifications to the Hospital fagade. I want the City of Bellflower to know that 1 strongly oppose the installation of any additionallights or lighting on the Bellflower Hospital parking lot. l support the Bellflower Hospital's efforts to beautify the facade of the hospital, but that plan should not include any changes to the lighting, because new lighting will cause a nuisance, and will be disruptive, and will negatively impact my quality of life.

Also, l oppose any construction to expand the size or height of the block wall that surrounds the parking lot. Because the parking lot is generally quiet, we see no reason to make any changes.

Thank you for taking this into consideration as you make yaur decision.

Soy residence de la Ciudad de Bellflower y vivo junto al estacionamiento de! Hospital Bellflower. Durante los ultimos anos, he notado que hay mucho mends ruido y actividad provenience del estacionamiento del Hospital Bellflower. Este ha sido un cambio notable con respecto a la operation anterior del hospital de servicio completo que estaba all[ anteriormente.

Los representantes del Hospital Bellflower me han informado que la Ciudad de Bellflower puede requerir que se instate iluminaclon adicional en el estacionamiento del Hospital junto con las proxlmas modificaciones a to fachada del Hospital. Quiero que la Ciudad de Bellflower sepa que me opongo firmemente a la instalacion de luces o iluminacion adicionales en el estacionamiento del Hospital Bellflower. Apoyo los esfuerzos del Hospital para embellecer lafachada del hospital, pero ese plan no debe incluir ningun camblo en la iluminacion, porque la nueva lluminacion causara una 'molestia, y sera perjudlcial, a impactar6 negativamente mi calidod de vida.

Adem6s, me opongo a cualquler construction para ampliar el tamano o !a altura del muro de bloques que rodeo el estacionamiento. Debida a que e! estacionamiento generalmente esta tranquiio, no vemos ninguna razon para hater camblos.

Gracias par tomar esto en cuenfia a/
Signature:

Printed Name:

Address:

Date:
-58-
tomarsu decision.

%the City of Bellflower:
1 am a resident of the City of Bellflower, and live adjacent to the Bellflower Hospital parking lot. For the last few years, l have noticed that there is a lot less noise and activity coming from the Bellflower Hospital parking tot. This has been a noticeable change from the prior operation of the full-service hospifal that was there previously.

Bellflower Hospital representatives have informed me that the City of Bellflower may require additional lighting to be installed in the Bellflower Hospital parking Jot in conjunction with upcoming modifications to the Hospital facade. l want the City of Bellflower to know that 1 strongly oppose the installation of any additional lights or lighting on the Bellflower Hospital parking lot. l support the Bellflower Hospital's efforts to beautify the facade of the hospital, but that plan should not include any changes to the lighting, because new lighting will cause a nuisance, and will be disruptive, and will negatively impact my quolity of life.

Also, 1 oppose any construction to expand the size or height of the block wall that surrounds the parking lot. Because the parking lot Is generally quiet, we see no reason to make any changes.

Thank you for taking this into consideration as you make your decision.

Soy residence de !a Ciudad de Bellflower y vivo junto al estacionamiento del Hospital Bellflower. Durance los tiltimos ands, he notado que hay mucho menos ruido y aciividad provenience de! estacionamiento del Hospital Bellflower. Este ha sido un cambio notable con respecto a la operacidn anterior del hospital de servicio complefo que estaba a11i anteriormente.

Cas representantes del Hospital Bellflower me han informado que la Ciudad de Bellflower puede requerir que se instale iluminacidn adicional en el estacionamiento del Hospital junto con las prdximas modificaciones a la fachada def Hospital. Quiero que la Ciudad de Bellflower sepa que me opongo firmemente a la instalacion de lutes o iluminacion adicionales en e! estacianamiento del Hospital Bellflower. Apoyo los esfuerzos del Hospital para embellecer la fachada de! hospital, Pero ese plan no debe incluir ningun cambia en la iluminaci�in, porque la nueva iluminacion causar6 una molestia, y sera perjudicial, a impactara negativamente mi caudad de villa.

Ademas, me opongo a cualquier construcci6n para ampliar el taman"a a !a altura de! muco de bloques que radea el estaclonamiento. Debido a que el estaclonamiento generalmente estci tranquilo, no vemos ninguna razon para hacertcamblos,
Gracias par torrl�. estq�n cu,�nta al t___ omor_s_u ci:

Signature:

Printed Name:

Address:

Date:
_59_

To the City of bellflower:
1 am a resident of the City of bellflower, and live adjacent a Bellflower Hospital parking lot. For the last few years, I have noticed that there is a lot less noise and activity coming from the Bellflower Hospital parking lot. This has been a noticeable change from the prior operation of the full-service hospital that was there previously.

Bellflower Hospital representatives have informed me that the City of bellflower may require additional lighting to be installed in the Bellflower Hospital parking lot in conjunction with upcoming modifications to the Hospital fagade. I want the City of Bellflower to know that I strongly oppose the installation of any additional lights orlighting on the Bellflower Hospital parking lot.1 support the Bellflower Hospital's efforts to beautify the facade of the hospital, but that plan should not include any changes to the lighting, because new lighting will cause a nuisance, and will be disruptive, and will negatively impact my quality of life.

Also, 1 oppose any construction to expand the size or height of the block wall that surrounds the parking lot. Because the parking lot is generally quiet, we see no reason to make any changes.

Thank you for taking this into consideration as you make your decision.

Soy residente de la Ciudad de Bellflower y vivo junto al estacionamiento del Hospital Bellfiower. Durance los ultimos an"os, he notado que hay mucho menos ruido y actividad provenience del estacionamiento del Hospital Bellflower. Este ha silo un cambio notable con respecto a la operacion anterior del hospital de servicio completo que estaba alli anteriormente.

Los representantes del Hospital bellflower me hen informado que la Ciudad de Bellflower puede requerir que at; instate iluminacion adicional en e! estacionamiento de! Hospital junto con las prdximas modificaciones a la fachada del Hospital. Quiero que la Ciudad de Bellflower sepa que me opongo firmemente a la instalacion de luces a iluminacion adicionales en el estacionamiento del Hospital Bellflower. Apoyo los esfuerzos del Hospital para embellecer la fachada del hospital, pero ese plan no debe incluir ningun cambio en la iluminacion, porque la nueva iluminacion causaro uno molestia, y sera perjudicial, a impactara negativamente mi calidad de vida.

Ademas, me opongo a cualquier construction para ampiiar el tamano o In allure del muro de bloques que
rodeo el estacionamiento. Debido a que e1 estacionamiento generatmente este tranquito, no vemos ninguna rozon para hacer comblos.

Gracias por tomer
Signature:

Printed Name:

Address:

Date:
-60-
cuentoal tomer su decision.

To the City of Bellflower:
1 am a resident of the City of Bellflower, and live adjacent to the Bellflower Hospital parking lot. For the last few years, 1 have noticed that there is a lot less noise and activity coming from the Bellflower Hospital parking lot. This has been a noticeable change from the prior operation of the full-service hospifal that was there previously.

Bellflower Hospital representatives have informed me that the City of Bellflower may require additional lighting to be installed in the Bellflower Hospital parking lot in conjunction with upcoming modifications to the Hospital facade. 1 want the City of Bellflower to know that 1 strongly oppose the installation of any additional lights or lighting on the Bellflower Hospital parking lot. l support the Bellflower Hospital's efforts to beautify the facade of the hospital, but that plan should not include any changes to the lighting, because new lighting will cause a nuisance, and will be disruptive, and will negatively impact my quality of life.

Also, l oppose any construction to expand the size or height of the block wall that surrounds the parking lot. Because the parking lot is generally quiet, we see no reason to make any changes.

Thank you for taking this into consideration as you make your decision.

Soy residence de la Ciudad de Bellflower y vivo junto al estacionamiento del Hospital Bellflower. Durance los ultimos anos, he notado que hay macho menos ruido y actividad provenience de! estacionamiento del Hospital Bellflower. Este ha sido un cambio notable con respecto a la operation anterior del hospital de servicio completo que estaba alli anteriormente.

Los representantes del Hospital Bellflower me han informado que la Ciudad de Bellflower puede requerir que se instate iluminacion adiciona! en el estacionamiento del Hospital junto con las proximas modificaciones a la fachada del Hospital. Quiero que la Ciudad de Bellflower sepa que me opongo firmemente a la instalacion de lutes o iluminacion adicionales en el estacionamiento del Hospital Bellflower. Apoyo los esfuerzos del Hospital para embellecer la fachada del hospital, pero ese plan no debe incluir ningirn cambia en la iluminacion, porque la nueva iluminacion causara una molestia, y sera perjudicial, e impactara negativamente mi calidad de vida.

Ademds, me opongo a cualquier construction para ampliar el tamano o la altura del muro de bloques que rodea el estacionamiento. Debido a que el estacionamiento generalmente esta tranquilo, no vemos ninguna razon para hater cambios.

Gracias por tomar esto en cuenta aI tomar su decision.

Signature:

Printed !Name:

Address:

Date:

Q S c� v C, orn-�z
� � � �a,r� vn� S�
f� i i� /z�
-61-

To the City of Bellflower:
1 am a resident of the City of Bellflower, and live adjacent to the Bellflower Hospital parking lot. for the last few years, 1 have noticed that there is a lot less noise and activity coming from the Bellflower Hospital parking lot. This has been a noticeable change from the prior operation of the full servlce hospital that was there previously.

Bellflower Hospital representatives have informed me that the City of Bellflower may require additional lighting to be installed in the Bellflower Hospital parking lot in conjunction with upcoming modifications to the Hospital facade. 1 want the City of Bellflower to know that 1 strongly oppose the installation of any additional lights or lighting on the Bellflower Hospital parking lot./ support the Bellflower Hospital's efforts to beautify the fagade of the hospital, but that plan should not include any changes to the lighting, because new lighting will cause a nuisance, and will be disruptive, and will negatively impact my quality of life.

Also, 1 oppose any construction to expand the size or height of the block wall that surrounds the parking lot. Because the parking lot is generally quiet, we see no reason to make any changes.

Thank you for taking this into consideration as you make your decision.

Soy residence de !a Ciudad de Bellflower y vivo junto al estacionamiento del Hospital Bellflower. Durance los 'Itimos anos, he notado que hay mucho menus ruido y actividad provenlente del estacionamlento del Hospital Bellflower. Este ha sido un cambio notable con respecto a la operacion anterior del hospital de servicio completo que estaba alli anteriormente.

Los representantes del Hospital Bellflower me hon informado que !a Ciudad de Bellflower puede requerir que se instate iluminacion adicionai en ei estaclonamlento del Hospital junto con !as proximas modificaclones a la fachada del Hospital. Quiero que la Ciudad de Bellflower sepa que me opongo firmemente a la instalacion de luces o iluminacion adicionales en e1 estacionamiento del Hospital Bellflower. Apoyo los esfuerzos del Hospital para embellecer la fachada del hospital, Pero ese plan no debe incluir ningun cambio en la iluminacion, porque la nueva iluminacion causara una molestia, y sera perjudidal, e impactara negativamente mi calidad de Vida.

Ademas, me opongo a cualquier construcclon para rim
pllar el taman"o o !a altura del muco de bloques que
rodeo el estacionamiento. Debido a que el estacionamiento generalmente esta tranquilo, no vPmos ninguna razon para hacer cambios.

Gracias par tornar esto en cuenta al tomarsu decision.

Signature:

Printed Name:

Address:

Date:
-62-

To the City of Bellflower:

I am a resident of the City of Bellflower, and live adjacent to the Bellflower Hospital parking lot. For the last few years, l have noticed that there is a lot less noise and activity coming from the Bellflower Hospital parking lot. This has been a noticeable change from the prior operation of the fuU-service hospital that was there previously.

Bellflower Hospital representatives have informed me that the City of Bellflower may require additional lighting to be installed in the Bellflower Hospital parking lot in conjunction with upcoming modifications to the Hospital facade. 1 want the City of Bellflower to know that 1 strongly oppose the installation of any additional lights orlighting on the BellflowerHospita/parking lot, lsupportthe Bellf/ower Hospital'seffnrts to beautify the facade of the hospital, but that plan should not include any changes to the lighting, because new lighting wit! cause a nuisance, and will be disruptive, and will negatively impact my quality of life.

Also, 1 oppose any construction to expand the size or height of the block wall that surrounds the parking lot. Because the parking lot is generally quiet, we see no reason to make any changes.

Thank you for taking this into consideration as you make your decision.

Soy residente de la Ciudad de Bellflower y vivo junto al estacionamiento del Hospital Bellflower. Durance los ultimos an"os, he notado que hay macho menos ruido y actividad proveniente del estacionamiento de! Hospital Bellflower. Este ha sido un cambio notable con respecto a la operation anterior de! hospital de servicio completo que estaba alli anteriormente.

Los representantes del Hospital Bellflower me hon informado que la Ciudad de Bellflower puede requerir que se instate iluminacion adicional en el estacionamiento del Hospital junto con las proximas modificaciones a la fachada del Hospital. Quiero que la Ciudad de Bellflower sepa que me opongo frrmemente a la instalacion de lutes o iluminacion adicionales en el estacionamiento de! Hospital Bellflower. Apoyo los esfuerzos del Hospital para embellecer la fachada del hospital, pero ese plan no debe incluir ningun cambio en la iluminacion, porque la nueva iluminacion causara una molestia, y sera perjudicial, e impactara negativamente mi calidad de vida.

Ademas, me opongo a cualquier construction para ampliar el taman"o o la altura del muro de bloques que rodeo e! estacionamiento. Debido a que el estacionamiento generalmente esta tranquilo, no vemos ninguna razors para hater cambios.

Gracias por tomar esto,��`eu�nta al tomarsu decision.

Signature:

Printed Name:

Address:

Date;
s�Y�z
�.. (� .. 7
-63-

F
V3 'a3molzn33a
On�0 VI531.W atis6
Id11dSUH J.1INI t..U%j 03I3UNb SOI
p4oid
YnPaau am IN laaliYa to �cPquuC uryP. W WIC w�alaW
-64-
W
W
w
Z
Y 0
Of W Q
O J U
Z 2� a -
O a J LL. p Z (n U
w
> Q W o YF -Z o�n
J 0 a_ W Lli0Ow>— 1
(D J O LLJ L� J W U)
Z 0 a U ppW JLLJ
w� Z Q WOfp UO
[ifZ O
a. o two Zap
wz L '� Q a �� JLyJ
O _ > w a_ o
cnZ O OZZOa w wZZ OLJ Z pp UJ
p0 O OJJOO X00 ZO(r Z�
W i= Z W O I- F-- O d W
a >j QODw��
�oyo oz ~ C J.wJ >�> W'
zCKZ ZD Zm O aWW J m�
Woa a a WW
Of ppp 4
pW�V)U)V)o(.9 www WOU)Ld
ZC�LL.0CDCD CDJ � G_FYw U:2LLJ�
OaOZZZOOZW W ppp QpF a�(n
p Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z o JUUC7U z z Z
�a-wwwwwwww00000ZzzzJJJ
W W a W
Ua aaaaaaaa�Nnd'lf)(Dr 0co AJJ II
xvnt3niaa
r, xFvt�3ais
ean�
Fes,
ane
0969—i69%*lL)CCl4-09916"oa "
�aisutwisaw•ataita uolsroszzlit
`IiFDiISonop 11p`lJo4
�� ;: r, =o
U�IS2 2RD211
�aPW Pu Paepa aY qo 'EV.`^0 am HWw O W n to Aj m ayl pw Xq Paco as Wu�. 1���IlS dNOWd2�
I
D
m yU
I
O
Z
Om
I
I
m
J
�Q
Z
W
I
I 1
r, xFvt�3ais
ean�
Fes,
ane
0969—i69%*lL)CCl4-09916"oa "
�aisutwisaw•ataita uolsroszzlit
`IiFDiISonop 11p`lJo4
�� ;: r, =o
U�IS2 2RD211
�aPW Pu Paepa aY qo 'EV.`^0 am HWw O W n to Aj m ayl pw Xq Paco as Wu�. 1���IlS dNOWd2�
'dlS�l�Jb'
w
0 0
C
a
tea—
D
m yU
O
Z
Om
m
J
�Q
Z
W
I 1
v
�Q
A
'dlS�l�Jb'
w
0 0
C
a

�'
fV
N
O
N
N
O
rl
®65®

c�
CO
C 0
0 Ln
4--J W
cu
C1�U ° )
o U
© oo u
C
a�
00 01i
D, � c� L
U °� ��
L e
0 co V) U
0 (1)
no o}� 6
L
Ul
u
J
�� 0 0 0

��
0 C
-67-

HBO
G� u
0 z
U
Z
UA
0 o
d0
d

Q
w
J
.-W
W
m
r
C/7
L
��-
Q�
+—
U
L
Q
O
O
�- -
,. / },
W
.{..J
N
O
O
U
QJ �
� �
�--+ t1A
� �
N
� `� U
s � O
�, `�
L � N
� � M
ca
� c -F -'n O
� 4-
� •— �
q''",p � tt0
i �
� O 0
1 U �
� C/') �
� � �
� L
(/') � �`
� U �
v � �
� � v
O —�
cn O
� (Z3 U
.� � N
� U _�
� � .0
-� �
� �
� � �
Q � (J')
� Q v
aA � .0
� �
� U C�
]�.�
W^,
l^�l^ y
`./ !!
W
�I
J
® o
O
� p�
V 1 - ^�,,.

O W
4- � �
o � 0
� �
� t�A �
CB �
�_
� .� ��_
L Q .
� t
� �
O � `�
� � a
� �- N
� .o O
U r -I
.N � �
i
� � a--+
� � '�
L
� (/') .Q
•� � •�
U')
� � �
N
.� ._
-� N �
� �
� s
U
N M f�
.� t!�
� ,Q� �
� � �
� � V
� (� _�
� � .o
s- -� cn
C6
O �
� � O
� � cn
� c� U
C6
O
cB
c6
C6
U
m
Q
-69-
` _
CX
I.
i�
1 1�_ � . . ..tee ��-
I
W
.{..J
N
O
O
U
QJ �
� �
�--+ t1A
� �
N
� `� U
s � O
�, `�
L � N
� � M
ca
� c -F -'n O
� 4-
� •— �
q''",p � tt0
i �
� O 0
1 U �
� C/') �
� � �
� L
(/') � �`
� U �
v � �
� � v
O —�
cn O
� (Z3 U
.� � N
� U _�
� � .0
-� �
� �
� � �
Q � (J')
� Q v
aA � .0
� �
� U C�
]�.�
W^,
l^�l^ y
`./ !!
W
�I
J
® o
O
� p�
V 1 - ^�,,.

O W
4- � �
o � 0
� �
� t�A �
CB �
�_
� .� ��_
L Q .
� t
� �
O � `�
� � a
� �- N
� .o O
U r -I
.N � �
i
� � a--+
� � '�
L
� (/') .Q
•� � •�
U')
� � �
N
.� ._
-� N �
� �
� s
U
N M f�
.� t!�
� ,Q� �
� � �
� � V
� (� _�
� � .o
s- -� cn
C6
O �
� � O
� � cn
� c� U
C6
O
cB
c6
C6
U
m
Q
-69-

LLA CL
j u
0 z
U
an-
u�
rc
0 CD
P
00 S�
4,
e
00 Oc,
O
7 04
� o �
0 0 0 0
Jc
o LLM U
U
O N J �
m m

Q)
Lv Q l
J Q
CMD C) C) f— m N 0 ml u7 r J

Q
I�'��
O
OD
c�

0 -t-

-75-

:��;:�' �
•�.. -
ti
N
U
O
O
_770

%1
�oo
in 0 0
C�C(IIJ
cid
u
00 C7
7 11

� � �
® �
-��-
p�
�I' e(—�e
IL7J r��
g�gJe, 9''
t�
gC�
rJl
W
Q
�--
W
�/
- _�,_
y--_
����
�� � � ���
.,� \�
��" '� ,
i ----t _ ,��-�_ :j _
i= ` I - �-
- —� �_ = ��
�- — - -.
a _, i
fN �,
_7 g_

Q
W
�-
W
-,_{
--=-
=`��s
b'
I
��
�r `.
°��, �II'
``
�' i
i � �-L1

���
� _`
�! ��
r
�I.
�-=
;�'� :t�
/� ' I
- _ � _- •
;- _
ti: 's ��'
f- � - �'-i..-.w:
�� - - �..
_-_ ��_
=t
v _ __
1 r;� _ -_ - _- -_,
- t r _-
- � -r "_ -
- .- ,i � � _
rt Y �; �,3
�Y {
r ; f �- •, t
- � � -
� � � .; _ -�
_ �
i � _
� �'�
a — I � r S� �
/ � 1
-__ � ���-
�� � � .
-� s
� _ _ _� �, a. �.
� � •�
•
- -_ _ — �
�= -
=- ■
�-` • _
- �
-- -__ � �i
- `.� - -
'*�-`;
- .....d.
;�'� :t�
/� ' I
- _ � _- •
;- _
ti: 's ��'
f- � - �'-i..-.w:
�� - - �..
_-_ ��_
=t
v _ __
1 r;� _ -_ - _- -_,
- t r _-
- � -r "_ -
- .- ,i � � _
rt Y �; �,3
�Y {
r ; f �- •, t
- � � -
� � � .; _ -�
_ �
i � _
� �'�
a — I � r S� �
/ � 1
-__ � ���-
�� � � .
-� s
� _ _ _� �, a. �.
� � •�
•
- -_ _ — �
�= -
=- ■
�-` • _
- �
-- -__ � �i
- `.� - -

_
,.
-�
QvIorp orcrop
—
040�
i42000000
aeopove
pace a 000 6�

�InI
11n1J(JjL
LJ
��1
j'��JInI
U
coo
O n�
C�
fff��f�
n �n
u
��
O ��
O D
C�

t t'[ � �
a! �� � 1
:�a�E��
at3jhE�
��Eii�3� iE
oe000ao
i 't- — — -- �� _
�` -0.o
���= ��Y l~I�ly9 I•I � al 1 ��
• ��— � �.
• ! i.i ! I•I 1 I•I f { i 0
I.I � I -I C I•I C1�16
�Y
�� --ra"
�_���._ _s_ ! . �� •
r..
6-I-� - -��- - -
• 1 •� e 1 1 `�b . �.
ey
�p
0 �4
--

C
- -�-�-
_ i �'�
� .'
� _ d � �,
a
-85-

� F
s
z � � �� � ��
t e :p
�q 5"s
� i � ; �� � �p ��
O C O fl Q 0 O
O � �
� '� • i
O -I—
+- , x U
� � _�
— N
a=
:�= z..aayn_
��
.. ' Q-^
-- � � I
�_ � i�
q,,, r x _.__ri.s�7
5 e
0 �' �.
�i a ��
F
9 f � ��
{1
' _ _- F 1
� :.

II
(f
II
iI
II
fl
II
-
fl
it
..--iI
;l
I,�:'II
I
,...
t
I
.

II
-
-- � � I
�_ � i�
q,,, r x _.__ri.s�7
5 e
0 �' �.
�i a ��
F
9 f � ��
{1
' _ _- F 1
� :.

.'
1 r •�•
• •r •
• •~
1 • 1
' �
� � -
1 1 ti
r
'� '� -
.,� �•
.�'�
ti
•�i,.
ti •:
:;• ti

1. .

IM
� �•
� '.
:�
R
f J � r. }
ti � 1 r Y
1 5 ti'1 ~ � f 1• 'f L
• } � l
1 _. � .�
' .l L
r
I ._
1 1 _ f' }�. .� . i
' �F' I {Irl' ••1 - y
'L
�. � + • •� 1
•••J. til• .. � � l
.1
•w ,
r• •r 1.., .••�. •.' •' •
ti. r �` 1 1
•� ••� y 1-.•.' • r
- '� . a' _ F
I 1 � L r
f 1
• 1
1 ',ti• r J'
• � f L ! f .L
""'`. ti..
' � - .
.• '� 1.:
ti' L •It .� ti 1 r � r ,
L' +'7' 1• r�r ,1
�r rtrw� -r--t �-4
_ _ 1
�1 . � ��'.■r9 Y � • rl � . ti 1. • �
.ti
. i 1 ; 7 1 I�L ti'''J' '�� '_7 � ■ 1 � r f
l •
Z
L $
' '.
. r
• 1
l
,•�
l
1"'
�'
'•L
�
r.
.

L
,
1 1 ti
r
'� '� -
.,� �•
.�'�
ti
•�i,.
ti •:
:;• ti

1. .

IM
� �•
� '.
:�
R
f J � r. }
ti � 1 r Y
1 5 ti'1 ~ � f 1• 'f L
• } � l
1 _. � .�
' .l L
r
I ._
1 1 _ f' }�. .� . i
' �F' I {Irl' ••1 - y
'L
�. � + • •� 1
•••J. til• .. � � l
.1
•w ,
r• •r 1.., .••�. •.' •' •
ti. r �` 1 1
•� ••� y 1-.•.' • r
- '� . a' _ F
I 1 � L r
f 1
• 1
1 ',ti• r J'
• � f L ! f .L
""'`. ti..
' � - .
.• '� 1.:
ti' L •It .� ti 1 r � r ,
L' +'7' 1• r�r ,1
�r rtrw� -r--t �-4
_ _ 1
�1 . � ��'.■r9 Y � • rl � . ti 1. • �
.ti
. i 1 ; 7 1 I�L ti'''J' '�� '_7 � ■ 1 � r f
l •
Z
L $
' '.
. r
• 1