13-B
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
ATTENTION: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
FROM: Karl H. Berger, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to adopt Resolution No. 24-54 – A Resolution adopted pursuant to Public Contracts Code § 20168 finding that an emergency exists within the City and authorizing contracting without the need for bidding pursuant to § 20168 and Bellflower Municipal Code (“BMC”) Chapters 3.28 and 8.36.
DATE: September 9, 2024
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This action is recommended to mitigate the public health and safety threats presented by the Property in its current state.
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
1) Adopt Resolution No. 24-54, declaring an emergency and authorizing contracting without formal bidding pursuant to Public Contracts Code § 20168 and Bellflower Municipal Code (BMC) sections 3.28.090 and 8.36.160, and Chapter 8.40;
2) Authorize the City Manager to execute a standard public works contract, in a form approved with the City Attorney, with a contractor to perform demolition for buildings located on the property located at 9103-9123 Artesia Boulevard;
3) Authorize the City Attorney to initiate litigation to abate any public nuisance on the property and take all legal actions required to ensure the City’s recovery of costs; or
4) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
FISCAL IMPACT
The preliminary engineering estimate for the abatement of nuisances on the Property is $200,000. All costs associated with the City’s assumption of control over the abatement process would be borne by the property owner. Part of the recommended actions of this matter include authorizing the City Attorney to take all legal actions needed to secure the City’s funding from the property owner including, without limitation, foreclosing on the securities already provided to the City.
-1-
01: 135141.110“?
4? {:4 # Staft'eport o $— ROMNG 1-c)<3‘éi‘""g
Staff Report – Resolution No. 24-54
September 9, 2024
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The emergency and extended repairs are categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to 14 California Code of Regulations § 15269 (demolition of the identified facilities is necessary to prevent or mitigate an emergency) and § 15301 (Existing Facilities). The expected action would demolish structures constituting a threat to public health and safety with no expansion of the existing use. The project is not anticipated to have any significant impacts regarding traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Additionally, the City Council’s actions are exempt from additional CEQA review as they are being made to protect public and private property and necessary to maintain services essential to the public, health and welfare (see, CalBeach Advocates v. City of Solana Beach (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 529: CEQA findings regarding an anticipated imminent emergency are valid).
BACKGROUND
The recommended action is desirable to ensure that public nuisances identified at the real property located at 9103-9123 Artesia Boulevard (the “Property”) are removed. While the property owner is already obligated to comply with an abatement order issued on May 31, 2024 (the “Abatement Order”), the proposed action would help ensure that Abatement Order is implemented either by the property owner (the current deadline is October 2nd for voluntary compliance) or by the City in accordance with an abatement warrant. A copy of the Abatement Order is attached as Exhibit “A”; a copy of the Final Notice of Compliance dated August 2, 2024, is attached as Exhibit “B.”
While the Abatement Order identifies specific items on the property that must be abated, the Property also now constitutes a vacant parcel that must comply with BMC Chapter 8.40. This means, among other things, that the Property must be landscaped along all perimeters adjacent to public streets.
As the Council is aware, public works projects ordinarily require a formal bidding process that can result in up to 90 days of delay for issuing a contract to a responsible bidder.
Here, the public nuisances at the Property must be permanently abated before the next rainy season.
It is unclear – in September – how wet the rainy season will be for 2024-2025. The traditional rainy season commences November 1st each year. Which is why most construction occurs during the summer months. The property owner was regularly reminded of his obligation to submit designs and plans for bringing the Property into compliance. To date, nothing formal has happened as to such planning.
If adopted, the draft Resolution requires substantial compliance with the Abatement Order and Final Notice. Whether substantial compliance is met by the stated deadline of October 3, 2024, is a determination which lies with the City Manager. Compliance would, at a minimum, take the form of permit-ready designs/plans approved by the City to allow the property owner’s private contractors to begin mobilizing.
-2-
Staff Report – Resolution No. 24-54
September 9, 2024
BACKGROUND – Continued
Should that not occur, then the Resolution authorizes the City Manager to utilize the informal bidding process in BMC Chapter 3.28 to select an appropriate contractor without additional City Council action. This will expedite the abatement process and (hopefully) allow the City to make significant progress toward nuisance abatement before Winter storms.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 24-54 ....................................................................................................... 4 Exhibit A – Abatement Order ........................................................................................... 7 Exhibit B – Final Notice of Compliance ......................................................................... 12
-3-
CITY OF BELLFLOWER
RESOLUTION NO. 24-54
A RESOLUTION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO PUBLIC CONTRACTS
CODE § 20168 FINDING THAT AN EMERGENCY EXISTS WITHIN THE
CITY AND AUTHORIZING CONTRACTING WITHOUT THE NEED FOR
BIDDING PURSUANT TO § 20168 AND BELLFLOWER MUNICIPAL
CODE (“BMC”) CHAPTERS 3.28 AND 8.36
THE CITY COUNCIL DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council finds and declares as follows:
A. Pursuant to Public Contracts Code (“PCC”) § 20168, the City Council may, upon a four-fifths vote, declare that public interest and necessity demand the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health, or property because of an emergency.
B. The real property located at 9103-9123 Artesia (the “Property”) consists of two adjacent parcels at the corner of Artesia Blvd. and Virginia Ave. They are owned by Artesia Enterprises, LLC, with Eitan Sharaf as its principal.
On May 31, 2024, an administrative hearing officer issued an order of abatement (“Abatement Order”) that requires the Property to be cleared and cleaned in accordance with applicable law including the BMC. A final deadline for voluntary compliance is October 2, 2024.
C. A review of the administrative record demonstrates that the property owner is unwilling or unable to timely cooperate with the City as to bringing the Property into compliance. Both the written record and verbal testimony make it apparent that any reasonable person should anticipate that the Property will continue to violate applicable law on and after October 2, 2024.
This is also demonstrated by the Property now being a vacant parcel that must comply with BMC Chapter 8.40 – something not contemplated by the Abatement Order, but constituting a new and ongoing violation of the BMC.
Among other things, the Property must be landscaped along all perimeters adjacent to public streets.
D. In accordance with PCC § 20168, and BMC Chapters 3.28, 8.36 and 8.40, the City Council may expend public money in furtherance of action required by that emergency, including procuring the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes, without soliciting for bids.
E. Based upon the history of the Property, the City Council finds it is in the public interest to ensure that the Property is brought into compliance with the Abatement Order and applicable law. Because the property owner has failed at this point to take substantive efforts towards compliance, the City will assume responsibility for completing required abatement at the Property owner’s cost. Accordingly, the City Council finds it to be in the public interest to authorize the City Manager to take the actions set forth in this Resolution.
-4-
City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 24-54
F. Any delay resulting from the City’s need to abate the imminent threats to public health on the Property will exacerbate the public nuisance already present on the Property. Among other things, the Property – as set forth in the Abatement Order – houses structures constituting attractive nuisances and blight. These nuisances constitute an emergency as contemplated by Public Contracts Code § 20168 and BMC Chapters 3.28, 8.36 and 8.40.
G. Under such conditions, the City Council finds that the delay resulting from public bidding would imperil public health and safety, and it is in the public's interest to complete procurement of a new contractor in the most expedient fashion.
SECTION 2. Environmental Assessment. The emergency and extended repairs are categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to 14 California Code of Regulations § 15269 (demolition of the identified facilities is necessary to prevent or mitigate an emergency) and § 15301 (Existing Facilities). The expected action would demolish structures constituting a threat to public health and safety with no expansion of the existing use. The project is not anticipated to have any significant impacts regarding traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Additionally, the City Council’s actions are exempt from additional CEQA review as they are being made to protect public and private property and necessary to maintain services essential to the public, health and welfare (see, CalBeach Advocates v. City of Solana Beach (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 529: CEQA findings regarding an anticipated imminent emergency are valid).
SECTION 3. Declaration of Emergency; Authorization. In adopting this Resolution, the City Council takes the following actions:
A. Based upon the entirety of the administrative record including, without limitation, the staff report, the City Council finds that an emergency exists as to abating the Property which constitutes an imminent threat to public health and safety that requires immediate action.
B. If, based upon the sole discretion of the City Manager, the property owner fails to commence substantive progress toward completing abatement as required by the Abatement Order and Final Notice by October 3, 2024 (“Project”), then the City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute a contract, in a form approved by the City Attorney, with the best qualified contractor to abate all public nuisances on the Property as authorized by an abatement warrant issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. While BMC Chapter 8.36 should be used for competitive selection of an appropriate contractor, all contracts may be awarded and executed in accordance with PCC § 20168 and BMC Chapter 3.28, 8.36 and 8.40.
C. The City Manager and City Attorney are authorized to undertake all actions required to recover the City’s costs related to the Project as authorized by applicable law.
-5-
City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 24-54
D. The City Manager is authorized to amend the 2024-25 budget to establish a $200,000 appropriation in CDBG and/or General Fund Code Enforcement including corresponding adjustments to revenues (cost recovery), to pay for property abatement at 9103-9121 Artesia Boulevard.
SECTION 4. Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.
SECTION 5. If any part of this Resolution or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Resolution are severable.
SECTION 6. The Mayor, or presiding officer, is authorized to affix its signature to this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City of Bellflower, and the City Clerk, or its duly appointed deputy, is directed to attest.
SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption and will remain effective unless repealed or superseded.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELLFLOWER THIS 9th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024.
________________________________
Dan Koops, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
Mayra Ochiqui, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________
Karl H. Berger, City Attorney
-6-
-7-
CITY OF BELLFLOWER
In the matter of: AMENDED
ORDER RE
9103-9121 Artesia Boulevard. ABATEMENT
I.
INTRODUCTION
Hearing on the above—entitled nuisance matter with respect to the real property located at 9103-9121 Artesia Boulevard (Property) in the City of Bellflower (City) was held commencing at 10:00 am. on February 8, 2024, in the City Hall pursuant to due notice thereof. Appearing for the City were Timothy E. Campen, Deputy City Attorney, and David Fawcett, Supervising Code Enforcement Officer. Appearing for the Property were Eitan Sharaf (Owner), his son and spouse. This Amended Order supersedes any previous orders, and is for the purpose of correcting minor typographical errors and providing additional clarity regarding compliance. ll.
BACK ROUND
Property is located in the M-zone and was acquired by Owner in 2014; title is held through an LLC. It has always been Owner's intent to develop the Property as affordable housing in the form of a 60-unit apartment building. Negotiations with the City for that purpose have not been fruitful to date.
There are apartment houses adjacent to the Property, the second floor of which look down on it. Artesia Boulevard is a main traffic artery in the City.
The Property currently has two tenants, a towing company and a nearby auto sales firm. The auto sales firm uses the Property as storage for a number of vans _.-_1.-
-8-
which are for sale at its other premises.
The Property first attracted the City's attention in 2016 due to its appearance, which includes the aforesaid vans, sign poles, engine parts, automotive repair, several dilapidated buildings and a trailer used as an office. Since the first notice sent by the City in 2016, Owner has been reasonably cooperative in cleaning up the site and its appearance has improved over the past years. However, Owner has balked at removing some of the buildings since he wants to use them as storage for his planned construction of the affordable-rent apartment house. Accordingly, this Order will focus on the appearance of the Property as of February 2024.
III.
Mum
Mr. Fawcett was sworn and identified Exhibits A through H as accurate representations of the Property and they were admitted into evidence. Exhibit F showed the Property as of January 17, 2024 and is the current condition of the Property. The evidence showed a number of vans lined up, a trailer on blocks, several dilapidated buildings, poles which once held signs and a chain-link fence on the property line, most of which is covered by tarpaulins.
The Property was once used for various purposes legally allowed at the time but subsequently rendered nonconforming by zone change. Among these was auto repair. Said nonconforming uses were abandoned by non-use for the requisite period and thus are no longer viable. Auto repair is currently being conducted without a license from the state.
There are currently two tenants on the Property, a towing service and the nearby auto sales firm which uses the Property for storage of vehicles. The towing firm will be evicted by the Owner. However, the auto sales firm has a lease and the Owner states that it will not leave.
-9-
IV.
EINDINQS
1. Property is owned by Eitan Sharaf through title held by his LLC.
2. Property has a number of vans apparently stored for ultimate sale by a tenant of Owner.
3. There are located on the Property several abandoned and dilapidated trailers and wooden buildings not in conformity with area standards.
4. There are also located on the Property a number of poles which once held signs.
5. The Property is surrounded by a chain-link fence covered by tarpaulins and located on the Property line.
6. Auto repair being conducted on the Property outside an enclosed building, an unpermitted use.
7. Said auto repair is being conducted without a State license.
8. There is motor oil and other fluids on the ground of Property which is a blight, and may be discharged onto public property and into the storm drain system.
9. There is evidence of other unpermitted uses of Property, such as auto repair, auto sales and auto storage].
10. Owner has been informed of the above-described nuisance conditions but has not taken corrective action to fully abate them.
V.
W
The foregoing Findings establish the following violations:
1. Municipal Code Section 8.36.030 prohibiting operation of business in violation of State law.
2. Municipal Code Section 8.36.030 (A)(3)(6)(10) re abandoned or dilapidated buildings or structures.
-10-
3. Municipal Code Section 1752060 (A) & (B) requiring fences to be back 10 feet from the property line.
4. Municipal Code Section 8.36.030(A)(29) prohibiting tarpaulins on chain link fencing.
5. Municipal Code Section 8.36.030(A)(21) which prohibits unpermitted signs.
6. Municipal Code Section 13.20.080 prohibiting pollutants runoff into storm drains.
7. Municipal Code Chapters 17.44 and 17.52 prohibiting uses not permitted such as auto repair, auto sales and auto storage.
8. Municipal Code Section 8.36.030(A)(31) prohibiting maintenance of property out of conformity with area standards.
ORDER
The conditions described in Findings 2-9 above constitute a public nuisance on the Property subject to abatement, including, without limitation: removal of all unpermitted uses on the Property; removal of all blighted and unpermitted structures from the Property; removal or elimination of blight of permitted structures (exterior siding, paint, and condition); elimination of any polluting substances from possible runoff into storm drains; elimination of stained and blighted lot surfaces; bring all fencing and signage into compliance with Municipal Code; generally bring entire property into conformity with area standards. Such abatement shall be made by the Owner within 90 days of this Amended Order and, if not completed within said time, shall be conducted by the City using its own or contracted personnel and all costs thereof shall be assessed against Property as a lien.
-11-
This decision is final and conclusive. Judicial review of this decision is subject to the provisions and time limits set forth in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5, et seq. ‘ C."
Richard R. Terzian 5 If I
Hearing Officer
DATED: May 3 l ,2024
Direct No.: 619.814.5810
[email protected]
Los Angeles – Inland Empire – Marin County – Oakland – Orange County – Palm Desert – San Diego – San Francisco – Silicon Valley – Ventura County 501 West Broadway - Suite 1600
San Diego, California 92101 -8474
voice 619.814.5800 - fax 619.814.6799
www.bwslaw.com
August 2, 2024
VIA U.S. MAIL, CERTIFIED MAIL AND ELECTRONIC MAIL
Eitan Sharaf
Artesia Enterprises LLC
7624 Firestone Blvd.
Downey, CA 90241
Email: [email protected]
Re: Code Enforcement Final Notice of Compliance
9103-9121 Artesia Blvd., Bellflower CA 90706
APNs 7162-016-044 and 7162-016-045
Dear Mr. Sharaf:
This letter represents the City of Bellflower’s Final Notice of Compliance with the administrative hearing officer’s amended order dated May 31, 2024 (“Amended Order”), concerning the above referenced real property (the “Property). Please read every word of this Notice carefully, as it provides important direction on your obligations, deadlines, and consequences of non-compliance.
The Amended Order states in relevant part for purposes of this Notice as follows:
The conditions described in Findings 2-9 (of the Order) constitute a public nuisance on the Property subject to abatement, including, without limitation: … [1] removal of all blighted and unpermitted structures from the Property; [2] removal or elimination of blight of permitted structures (exterior siding, paint, and condition); … [3] elimination of stained and blighted lot surfaces; [4] bring all fencing and signage into compliance with Municipal Code; [5] generally bring entire property into conformity with area standards. Such abatement shall be made by the Owner within 90 days of this Amended Order and, if not completed within said time, shall be conducted by the City using its own or contracted personnel and all costs thereof shall be assessed against Property as a lien. (Bold and numbering added for emphasis and clarity.)
-12-
Q ‘
BURKE. WILLIAMS 8. SORENSEN, LLP
Eitan Sharaf
9103-9221 Artesia Blvd.
August 2, 2024
FINAL NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE
Compliance with the following corrective actions must be completed no later than 5:00 p.m. on October 2, 2024:
[1] removal of all blighted and unpermitted structures from the Property.
After thorough review and consideration of all available evidence, including documentation provided by you, the City has confirmed that the remaining trailer in the middle of the Property designated as area “D” in Exhibit 1 below is an unpermitted structure. It is also among the structures found to be blighted i n the Amended Order.
There are no City permits or approvals for trailers on the Property. Accordingly, you must either remove all trailers from the Property, including all blight associated with any such trailers, or obtain all required permits and approvals from the City for such trailers. [2] removal or elimination of blight of permitted structures (exterior siding, paint, and condition).
The three structures designated as areas “A,” “B,” and “C” in Exhibit 1 remain dilapidated and are a blight on the City. You must either demolish and remove these structures, or obtain necessary permits and approvals from the City to rehabilitate all the structures you wish to remain.
[3] elimination of stained and blighted lot surfaces.
You must eliminate all illicit discharge from the Property, including, without limitation, removing all stains, oil, and other vehicle fluids, from all surfaces on the Property such that the Property remains free of blight.
[4] bring all fencing and signage into compliance with Bellflower Municipal Code This includes, without limitation, ensuring no fencing is within the 10 -foot setback from any public sidewalks, and that any other fencing remaining on the Property complies with the Bellflower Municipal Code, including, without limitation, all required ap provals and permits.
[5] generally bring entire property into conformity with area standards.
This refers to bringing the condition and appearance of the Property into conformity with the maintenance standards of other properties in the vicinity, including, without limitation, removing all blight from the Property.
-13-
O ‘
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN. LLP
Eitan Sharaf
9103-9221 Artesia Blvd.
August 2, 2024
Exhibit 1
For reference on understanding what physical “blight” of property includes, Merriam Webster Dictionary defines blight as “a deteriorated condition.” California Health & Safety Code § 33031, (although originally intended for redevelopment law) is also instructive, and states in relevant part as follows:1
(a) This subdivision describes physical conditions that cause blight:
(1) Buildings in which it is unsafe or unhealthy for persons to live or work. These conditions may be caused by serious building code violations, serious dilapidation and deterioration caused by long-term neglect, construction that is vulnerable to serious damage from seismic or geologic hazards, and faulty or inadequate water or sewer utilities.
(2) Conditions that prevent or substantially hinder the viable use or capacity of buildings or lots. These conditions may be caused by buildings of
1 Definitions and examples of blight provided in this Notice are not intended to be exhaustive and should not be interpreted as any limitation of the types or extent of conditions that amount to physical blight. -14-
.
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO
A
RENSEN. LLP
Ja
r
mm
b
u
A
an
y
“n
e
w
.
S ‘5 a
E n
”V
7 m6
»
!
\
'A'HESIa'BIVd — — Arlesla BWd"
Eitan Sharaf
9103-9221 Artesia Blvd.
August 2, 2024
substandard, defective, or obsolete design or construction given the present general plan, zoning, or other development standards.
Applied to the Property, and as previously communicated to you many times: the structures on the Property show deteriorated conditions, lack of maintenance, and haphazard repairs; fencing is old and dilapidated; the lot surfaces are stained from illicit discharge, cracked and damaged due primarily to years of auto repair work and exposure to industrial substances. Examples of blighted conditions, which are not exhaustive, are shown in the following photos of the Property:
-15-
O ‘
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN. LLP
1“""~"3-2_.'....i.r , -7 \
.3. IIIMWHIHIE Mm
Eitan Sharaf
9103-9221 Artesia Blvd.
August 2, 2024
By way of example, compare the conditions of the Property to your other commercial properties located at 17321-17341 Clark Ave. in Bellflower and at 7624 Firestone Blvd. in Downey, as depicted below in Examples 1 and 2, respectively.
Example 1 - 17321-17341 Clark Ave
-16-
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN. LLP
Eitan Sharaf
9103-9221 Artesia Blvd.
August 2, 2024
Example 2 - 7624 Firestone Blvd.
Your other two commercial properties shown above demonstrate your experience with well-maintained properties and provide a clear guide for expectations of abatement of your blighted Property.
TAKE NOTICE
Be further advised that your obligation to timely comply with the Amended Order abating the nuisances on the Property takes priority over, and is independent from, any intended uses of the Property as a contractor’s office, contractor’s equipment yard, or any long-term development of the Property. You are free to combine your abatement efforts with construction for intended uses of the Property, but doing so will not extend the abatement deadline.
Be further advised that compliance with the Amended Order does not necessarily mean that the Property would then necessarily be fully compliant with the Bellflower Municipal Code (“BMC”). The Amended Order addresses specific nuisances on the Property. It is your responsibility to ensure it is otherwise compliant with all applicable law . Every day a violation of the BMC exists, it is considered a new and independent violation. The City reserves the right to pursue enforcement of all violations on the Property, beyond the Amended Order, by any and all means permitted by law.
Be further advised that no further extensions or notices will be provided, and the City reserves its right to pursue an abatement warrant to enter upon the Property to abate -17-
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN. LLP
Eitan Sharaf
9103-9221 Artesia Blvd.
August 2, 2024
the public nuisances thereon consistent with the Amended Order, its police powers, and as otherwise provided by law if this deadline is not strictly met. You have been aware of your obligation to abate the nuisances specified in the Amended Order going bac k to at least February 2021 when a formal Notice of Public Nuisance was served on you by the City Attorney’s Office, and numerous notices since.
Be further advised that after inspection of the Property by the Building Official, he has confirmed that October 2, 2024, is sufficient time to comply with the Corrective Actions listed in this Notice, particularly given your being a licensed contractor and property development experience.
Be Advised that the City is not going to provide you with detailed, pinpoint instruction or lists of the exact aspects of the Property that are blighted or otherwise not in conformity with the BMC, nor precisely how to eliminate their blighted conditions. As a licen sed contractor and owner of many other commercial developments over the years, you are well equipped to understand the difference between a deteriorated property and one that appears respectable and well maintained from the public right-of-way. Using your own commercial properties mentioned above provides sufficient examples of the level of appearance and maintenance that would eliminate the blight of the Property.
Be Advised that during the Building Official’s recent inspection of the Property, he observed conditions that are not compliant with current building codes and/or indicated unpermitted work. This includes, without limitation, issues with the structures, electrical and plumbing. Any structures you intend to keep and use on the property may involve work that requires permits from the City.
Be Advised that City staff will review and process any plans that you submit within a reasonable time. It is your responsibility to factor in time for plan review in meeting your October 2, 2024 deadline. Feedback will be provided by comments and corrections to plans, as needed. You should not expect any direction or informal review from any City staff before, or in preparation of, submitting plans to the City.
Be Advised that should the City abate your Property, you will be responsible for the City’s costs of abatement, including attorney fees. Failure to pay the City’s abatement costs in full will result in the City placing a lien and special tax assessment on your Property to recoup these costs. Further, the City may seek foreclosure and sale your Property under that lien to recover its abatement costs.
Be Advised that any communications with this Office or City staff regarding the contents of this Notice or compliance with the Amended Order should be in writing or witnessed by at least two City personnel. Doing so will help preserve a clear record of events and avoid any misunderstandings.
-18-
D ‘
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLF’
Eitan Sharaf
9103-9221 Artesia Blvd.
August 2, 2024
Be Advised that the directives and contents of this Notice have the support and backing of the City Council, City Manager, and City Executive Management. As always, the City encourages and prefers voluntary compliance. But given the long history of unlawful uses and maintenance of your Property, particularly where these violations pose an immediate threat to public health, safety, and general welfare, the City’s patience has come to an end.
In conclusion, you have been on notice of your obligation to eliminate the blighted conditions of the Property for years, and were ordered to do so within 90 days of the Administrative Order dated February 14, 2024. The Amended Order of May 31, 2024, which was provided as a courtesy for additional clarity concerning your obligations of compliance, extended that deadline to August 29, 2024. This current deadline of October 2, 2024, represents the final extension of time promised by this Office —there will be no further extensions. You may wish to consult with legal counsel.
You or your legal counsel may me regarding this Notice by email at [email protected].
Sincerely,
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP
Timothy E. Campen
Assistant City Attorney, City of Bellflower
cc: Bellflower City Council
Ryan Smoot, City Manager
Karl H. Berger, City Attorney
Elizabeth Oba, Director of Planning and Building Services Rowena Genilo-Concepcion, Planning Manager
Brian McNerney, Interim Director of Public Safety
David Fawcett, Code Enforcement Supervisor
-19-
D ‘
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLF’