14-D
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
ATTENTION: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
FROM: Len Gorecki, Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works Sarah Ho, Public Works Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to adopt Resolution No. 25-30 – A Resolution approving and certifying the Sewer System
Management Plan (SSMP).
Date: September 8, 2025
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
As a party to the State Sanitary Sewer System Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR), the City is required to update and recertify the City’s Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) every five years. The City, in conjunction with the Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District of Los Angeles County, has updated the SSMP to remain in conformance with the WDR.
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
1) Adopt Resolution No. 25-30, or
2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
FISCAL IMPACT
None. Funding for the preparation of the SSMP is included in the Capital Improvements Program Budget for FY2025-26 under Account No. 230-42054-9000 (Sewer Reconstruction Funds).
DISCUSSION
On May 2, 2006, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) adopted Order No. 2006-0003, entitled Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements for Sanitary Sewer Systems (the “Order”). The purpose of the Order is to minimize, if not prevent, sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) from occurring and potentially causing a nuisance, contaminating ground water, and/or contaminating the waterways of the United States.
As owner of a sanitary sewer system greater than one mile in length, the City is subject to the Order.
F BELLF
{vi 0 LOVVEQ
% Stmieport
Staff Report – Resolution No. 25-30
September 8, 2025
DISCUSSION – Continued
The Order required the City to develop and implement a SSMP, which was completed and approved by the City Council on July 13, 2009. The “Audit and Certification” element of the SSMP requires the City to conduct internal audits every two years, and to updat e and recertify the SSMP every five years to incorporate any significant program changes.
As a member of the Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District of Los Angeles County (District), the City’s Sanitary sewer system is maintained and operated by the District. The Public Works Department works in conjunction with District staff in the assessment of the SSMP. Internal audits of the SSMP were initiated and completed every two years.
Since the inception of the SSMP in 2009, there have only been thirteen reportable SSOs emanating from the City’s sanitary sewer system. That excludes “private lateral” sewage discharges, which are not categorized as SSOs. Private laterals are those portions of the sewage conveyance infrastructure that service private properties by connecting the public sewer trunk (main) lines and are the responsibility of the private property owners. Based on the results of the internal audits, the City’s overall effectiveness of the SSMP has been found to be excellent and no major changes to the SSMP were recommended.
Updates to the SSMP included revisions to Section 2.3.1a “City of Bellflower Organization Chart for Sanitary Sewer System Management” and SSMP Section 2.3.5 “City’s Contact Directory for SSO Responding and Reporting” to account for changes to City staff.
Public Works recommends the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving and recertifying the City’s SSMP, as required by State regulations. Once adopted, Public Works staff will then submit the recertified SSMP to the SWRCB.
ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 25-30....................................................................................................... 3
CITY OF BELLFLOWER
RESOLUTION NO. 25-30
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CERTIFYING THE SEWER SYSTEM
MANAGEMENT PLAN (SSMP)
THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Recitals. The City Council finds and declares as follows:
A. On May 2, 2006, the State Water Resources Control Board (“SWRCB”) adopted Order No. 2006-003 (Order), which entails the Statewide General Water Discharge Requirements for
Sanitary Sewer Systems (“WDRs”).
B. The purpose of the WDRs is to reduce the frequency and volume of sanitary sewer overflows, improve the condition of the City of Bellflower’s (“City”) municipal sanitary sewer infrastructure, and protect the environment.
C. The City owns a sanitary sewer system greater than one mile in length that collects and conveys untreated and partially treated wastewater to a publicly owned treatment facility in the State of California and is required to develop and implement a
system-specific Sewer System Management Plan (“SSMP”) in accordance with the terms of the Order.
D. On July 13, 2009, the City Council approved a comprehensive SSMP as required by the Order, including the required provisions to provide proper and efficient management, operation, and maintenance of the City’s sanitary sewer system.
E. The SSMP contains a spill response plan establishing standard procedures for immediate response to sanitary sewer overflows in a manner designed to minimize water quality impacts.
F. The Order requires the City to update and recertify the SSMP every five years.
G. The SSMP was last recertified on October 28, 2019.
SECTION 2. The City Council approves and recertifies the City of Bellflower Sewer System Management Plan, attached as Exhibit “A” and incorporated by reference.
City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 25-30
SECTION 3. Preservation. This Resolution does not affect any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred before, or preclude prosecution and imposition of penalties for any violation occurring before, this Resolution’s effective date. Any such amended part will remain in full force and effect for sustaining action or prosecuting violations occurring before the effective date of this Resolution.
SECTION 4. Limitations. The City Council’s analysis and evaluation of the project is based on the best information currently available. It is inevitable that in evaluating a project that absolute and perfect knowledge of all possible aspects of the project will not exist. One of the major limitations on analysis of the project is the City Council’s lack of knowledge of future events. In all instances, best efforts were made to form accurate assumptions. Somewhat related to this are the limitations on the C ity's ability to solve what are in effect regional, state, and national problems and issues. The City must work within the political framework within which it exists and with the limitations inherent in that framework.
SECTION 6. Reliance On Record. Each and every one of the findings and determinations in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City Council in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole.
SECTION 7. Summaries of Information. All summaries of information in the findings, which precede this section, are based on the substantial evidence in the record.
The absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a particular finding is not based in part on that fact.
SECTION 8. Construction. This Resolution must be broadly construed to achieve the purposes stated in this Resolution . It is the City Council’s intent that the provisions of this Resolution be interpreted or implemented by the City and others in a manner that facilitates the purposes set forth in this Resolution.
SECTION 9. Severability. If any part of this Resolution or its Application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Resolution are severable.
SECTION 10. Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.
SECTION 11. The Mayor, or presiding officer, is authorized to affix its signature to this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City of Bellflower, and the City Clerk, or its duly appointed deputy, is directed to attest.
City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 25-30
SECTION 12. Effective Date. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption and will remain effective unless repealed or superseded.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELLFLOWER THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025.
________________________________
Ray Dunton, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Mayra Ochiqui, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Karl H. Berger, City Attorney
_______________________________________
By: Justin A. Tamayo, Assistant City Attorney
ATTACHMENT:
Exhibit A – Sewer System Maintenance Plan
Sewer System
Management Plan
2025 SSMP Update
Bellflower / Los Angeles County Public
Works
Los Angeles, California
August 31, 2025
cm or BELLFLOWER 'N
, Public 1/1/0446;
‘6" Q. LOS ANGELES COUNTY 0019 «‘62
INGTOG‘E’
Luzlilux llL.\iI;r-.\rn I:.lLu'~.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
August 31, 2025 | i
Contents
1 Goal and Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Regulatory Context .................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 SSMP Goal and System Management Objectives ................................................................... 4
1.3 SSMP Update Schedule............................................................................................................ 5
1.4 Sewer System Asset Overview ................................................................................................. 8
1.4.1 Access to Up-to-Date Mapping .................................................................................. 12
1.5 SSMP Overview ...................................................................................................................... 12 2 Organization ...................................................................................................................................... 13
2.1 Overview.................................................................................................................................. 13
2.2 Authorized Representatives .................................................................................................... 59
2.3 Positions Responsible for Implementing Specific SSMP Elements ........................................ 62
2.3.1 Positions Responsible ................................................................................................ 62
2.3.2 Lines of Authority ........................................................................................................ 63
2.4 Spill Reporting Chain of Communication ................................................................................ 65 3 Legal Authority .................................................................................................................................. 67
3.1 Overview.................................................................................................................................. 67
3.2 Authority to Prevent Illicit Industrial Waste Discharges into the Collection System ................ 69
3.2.1 Prevention of Illicit Discharge of FOG ........................................................................ 69
3.2.2 Prevention of Illicit Discharge of Infiltration/Inflow ...................................................... 69
3.3 Authority to Collaborate with Storm Sewer Agencies ............................................................. 69
3.4 Authority to Require Proper Design and Construction of Sewers ........................................... 70
3.5 Authority to Ensure Access to Publicly Owned Portion of Lateral .......................................... 70
3.6 Limit the Authority to Discharge of FOG and other Debris ...................................................... 70
3.7 Authority to Obtain Easement Accessibility Agreements When Applicable ............................ 70 4 Operation and Maintenance Program ............................................................................................... 72
4.1 Up-to-Date Map of the Collection System ............................................................................... 72
4.1.1 Procedures for Maintaining and Providing Access to Water Boards Staff ................. 72
4.1.2 Availability of Up-to-Date Mapping to Support Collection System Management .............................................................................................................. 75
4.2 Preventive Maintenance Program ........................................................................................... 76
4.2.1 CCTV Inspection ........................................................................................................ 76
4.2.2 Sewer Line and Manhole Visual Inspection ............................................................... 77
4.2.3 Gas Trap Manholes and Siphons ............................................................................... 77
4.2.4 Drop Manholes ........................................................................................................... 77
4.2.5 Sewer Line Cleaning .................................................................................................. 77
4.2.6 Root Foaming ............................................................................................................. 77
4.2.7 Periodic Maintenance ................................................................................................. 77
4.2.8 Vermin and Odor Control ........................................................................................... 77
4.2.9 Treatment Plants and Pumping Stations.................................................................... 78
4.3 Scheduling and Data Collection .............................................................................................. 78
4.4 Training.................................................................................................................................... 78
4.5 Equipment Inventory ............................................................................................................... 79
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
August 31, 2025 | ii
5 Design and Performance Provisions ................................................................................................. 81
5.1 Design and Construction Standards and Specifications ......................................................... 81
5.2 Procedures and Standards for Inspecting and Testing System Improvements ...................... 81 6 Spill Emergency Response Plan ....................................................................................................... 83
6.1.1 Pre-Planned Coordination with Other Agencies or Departments .............................. 83 7 Sewer Pipe Blockage Control Program ............................................................................................. 84
7.1 Program Overview ................................................................................................................... 84
7.2 Implementation Plan and Schedule for Public Outreach ........................................................ 86
7.2.1 Summary of Outreach Activities ................................................................................. 86
7.2.2 Plan and Schedule of Events ..................................................................................... 86
7.3 Plan and Schedule for Disposal of FOG ................................................................................. 87
7.4 Authority to Prohibit FOG Discharges and Identify Measures to Prevent FOG Spills ............ 87
7.4.1 Authority ..................................................................................................................... 87
7.4.2 Preventative Measures............................................................................................... 87
7.5 FOG Program Requirements and Design Standards ............................................................. 87
7.5.1 Requirements to Install Grease Removal Devices .................................................... 87
7.5.2 Design Standards for Grease Removal Devices ....................................................... 88
7.5.3 Maintenance Requirements ....................................................................................... 88
7.5.4 Best Management Practices Requirements ............................................................... 89
7.5.5 The Pretreatment Guidelines for Restaurants and Food Service Operations provide guidelines and best management practices for selecting and installing pretreatment devices. These guidelines outline the installation requirements for grease interceptors and offer a list of alternative pretreatment devices that can be used in lieu of a grease interceptor. ..................... 89
7.5.6 Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements .......................................................... 89
7.5.7 Procedures ................................................................................................................. 89
7.6 Inspection and Enforcement Program ..................................................................................... 90
7.6.1 Authority to Inspect Grease Producing Facilities ....................................................... 90
7.6.2 Authority to Enforce .................................................................................................... 90
7.6.3 Resource Plan to Inspect and Enforce ....................................................................... 90
7.7 Maintenance Program to Address FOG Issues ...................................................................... 91
7.8 Implementation of Source Control Measures to Address FOG Issues ................................... 91
7.8.1 Summary of Source Control Measures ...................................................................... 91
7.8.2 Summary of Source Control Program Enforcement .................................................. 91 8 System Evaluation, Capacity Assurance and Capital Improvements ............................................... 92
8.1 System Evaluation and Condition Assessment ...................................................................... 92
8.1.1 Best Practices and New Technology ......................................................................... 92
8.1.2 Amount of System Condition Assessment ................................................................. 92
8.1.3 Inspection and Condition Assessment Prioritization .................................................. 92
8.1.4 Inspection Methods .................................................................................................... 93
8.1.5 Utilizing Observations for Condition Assessment ...................................................... 93
8.1.6 Inspection and Assessment Recordkeeping .............................................................. 94
8.1.7 Assessing Assets Vulnerable to Climate Change ...................................................... 94
8.2 Capacity Assessment and Design Criteria .............................................................................. 95
8.2.1 Gravity Facilities ......................................................................................................... 95
8.2.2 Pressure Facilities ...................................................................................................... 95
8.2.3 Infiltration and Inflow .................................................................................................. 96
8.2.4 Erosive Forces in Canyons and Streams ................................................................... 96
8.2.5 Design Flow and Weather Events .............................................................................. 96
8.2.6 Capacity Assessment Data ........................................................................................ 96
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
August 31, 2025 | iii
8.2.7 Capacity Enhancement Plan ...................................................................................... 97
8.3 Prioritization of Corrective Actions .......................................................................................... 97
8.4 Capital Improvement Plan ....................................................................................................... 97
8.4.1 Accumulative Capital Outlay Program ....................................................................... 98
8.4.2 Joint Coordination and Interagency Coordination ...................................................... 98 9 Monitoring, Measurement and Program Modifications ..................................................................... 99
9.1 Maintenance of Information to Prioritize SSMP Activities ....................................................... 99
9.2 Monitoring of Implementation and Effectiveness of the SSMP ............................................. 101
9.3 Program Audits ...................................................................................................................... 101
9.4 Assessment of Preventative Maintenance Program ............................................................. 101
9.5 Identification and Illustration of Spill trends ........................................................................... 101
9.6 Approach to Program Modifications and Plan Updates ........................................................ 102 10 SSMP Program Audits .................................................................................................................... 103
10.1 Schedule of Program Audits and Updates ............................................................................ 103
10.2 SSMP Audit Process ............................................................................................................. 104
10.3 SSMP Audit Report ............................................................................................................... 104
10.4 Audit Implementation and Tracking of Results...................................................................... 104 11 Communication Program ................................................................................................................. 106
11.1 Procedures to Communicate with Public for Spills and Discharges ..................................... 106
11.2 Procedures for General Communication with Public on SSMP ............................................ 106
11.3 Procedures to Communicate with Connecting Systems and Contract Agencies ................. 107
Tables
Table 1-1: Summary of General Order Requirements .................................................................................. 1 Table 1-2: LACPW’s Sewer-Related Services to the 38 CSMD Cities1 ........................................................ 3 Table 1-3: SSMP Audit and Update Schedule .............................................................................................. 5 Table 1-4: Planned SSMP Implementation Milestones Addressing Prevention of Sewer Spills .................. 7 Table 2-1: Collection Systems Operated, Maintained and Managed by Sewer Maintenance Division ........................................................................................................................................... 60 Table 2-2: Positions Responsible for SSMP ............................................................................................... 62 Table 3-1: Summary of Legal Authorities Relating Legal Authority Element of General Order .................. 68 Table 3-2: Summary of Legal Authorities Relating Sewer Pipe Blockage Control Program Element of General Order ............................................................................................................................ 68 Table 4-1: Summary of Training Program ................................................................................................... 79 Table 4-2: List of Major Equipment ............................................................................................................. 80 Table 6-1: Spill Emergency Response Plan General Order Compliance ................................................... 83 Table 7-1: Number of FSEs per City/Area .................................................................................................. 85 Table 8-1: ACO Program Contract List ....................................................................................................... 98 Table 9-1: Information Systems Relevant to SSMP Implementation and Monitoring ............................... 100 Table 10-1: SSMP Audit and Update Schedule ........................................................................................ 103
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
August 31, 2025 | iv
Figures
Figure 1-1: City and CSMD Service Area Map ........................................................................................... 11 Figure 2-1: City and LACPW’s Organizational Chart .................................................................................. 63 Figure 2-2a: SMD Organizational Chart ...................................................................................................... 64 Figure 2-2b: City Organizational Chart ....................................................................................................... 64 Figure 2-3: Spill Reporting Chain of Communication – Normal Business Hours ........................................ 66 Figure 2-4: Spill Reporting Chain of Communication – After Hours ........................................................... 66 Figure 4-1: Sewer Network Map ................................................................................................................. 73 Figure 4-2: Sewer Plans Webpage ............................................................................................................. 74 Figure 4-3: Operations Map Overview Map ................................................................................................ 75
Appendices
Appendix A1 - Governing Board Approval
Appendix A2 – State Water Resources Control Board - General Order for Sanitary Sewer Systems Appendix A3 – Asset Summary Per Collection System
Appendix B1 – List of Staff Responsible for Implementing Specific Elements of the SSMP Appendix B2 – City and Sewer Maintenance Division Staff Contact Sheet Appendix C – Not Used
Appendix D – LACPW’s Field Operations Yard and Pump Station Map Appendix E – Not Used
Appendix F – Spill Emergency Response Plan
Appendix G – IDWP Conditions and Limitations
Appendix H – Not Used
Appendix I – Not Used
Appendix J – Not Used
Appendix K – Not Used
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
August 31, 2025 | v
Acronyms
Acronym Definition
ACO Accumulative Capital Outlay
BMP Best Management Practices
BSD Building and Safety Division
CCTV Closed Circuit Television
CAD Computer-Aided Design and Drafting
CALOSHA California Occupational Safety and Health Administration CAP Condition Assessment Program
CIP Capital Improvement Plan
CIPP Cured-In-Place Pipe
CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality System
CGRG Community and Government Relations Group
CS Collection System
CSMD Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District
CWEA California Water Environment Association
EPD Environmental Programs Division
FOG Fats, Oils, and Grease
FSE Food Service Establishment
GI Grease Interceptor
GIS Geographic Information System
GRD Grease Removal Device
IBEW International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
I/I Infiltration and Inflow
IWDP Industrial Waste Disposal Permit
LACO Los Angeles County Ordinance
LACPW Los Angeles County Public Works
LACSD Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts
LDD Land Development Division
LRO Legally Responsible Official
LVMWD Las Virgenes Municipal Water District
MMS Maintenance Management System
MSMD Marina Sewer Maintenance Division
NASSCO National Association of Sewer Service Companies
PACP Pipeline Assessment and Certification Program
PM Periodic Maintenance
‘-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
:n
n
n
n
n
n
n
u
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
August 31, 2025 | vi
Acronym Definition
PMD III Project Management Division III
SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System
SERP Spill Emergency Response Plan
SMD Sewer Maintenance Division
SSMP Sewer System Management Plan
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
WDR Wastewater Discharge Requirements
[If [It
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
August 31, 2025 | vii
This page is intentionally left blank.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
| 1
1 Goal and Introduction
1.1 Regulatory Context
The City of Bellflower along with Los Angeles County Public Works (LACPW) has prepared this updated Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) December 6, 2022, Statewide Sanitary Sewer Systems General Order 2022- 0103-DWQ (General Order). This SSMP provides a management plan for Los Angeles County Public Works (PW), which administers the following Sewer Maintenance Districts (Districts) in Los Angeles County responsible for operating and maintaining the collection systems:
• Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District (CSMD); and
• Marina Sewer Maintenance District (MSMD);
In addition, through service agreements, PW operates and maintains the collections systems for the Cities of Irwindale, West Hollywood, and Montebello.
This SSMP provides a management plan for Bellflower, which is part of the CSMD.
Table 1-1 summarizes the General Order requirements addressed by this SSMP1. These requirements are defined by General Order specifications and associated General Order attachments. All agencies that own and operate collection systems greater than one mile in length must comply with these requirements.
Table 1-1: Summary of General Order Requirements
Specification Description Linkage to SSMP
5.2 SSMP
Development and
Implementation
Requires development and implementation of a SSMP
Entire SSMP
5.3 Certification of
SSMP and Plan
Updates
Requires City to certify and upload the SSMP to CIWQS
Entire SSMP
5.5 Six-Year SSMP
Update
Requires update of the SSMP every 6 years, at a minimum.
Requires governing board approval of SSMP. Requires
City to certify and upload SSMP to CIWQS. Entire SSMP
5.6 System Resilience Requires LACPW to include and implement system- specific procedures to proactively prioritize operations and maintenance, condition assessments and repair and
rehabilitation to address system resilience
D.4 Operations and
Maintenance
D.8 System Evaluation,
Capacity Assurance
and Capital Planning
5.10 System Capacity Requires City to maintain system capacity to convey dry weather and forecasted wet weather flows D.8 System Evaluation, Capacity Assurance
and Capital Planning
1 Summarized from the SWRCB Order No. 2022-0103-DWQ Statewide Waste Discharge Requirements General Order for Sanitary Sewer Systems
fin”
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
| 2
Table 1-1: Summary of General Order Requirements
Specification Description Linkage to SSMP
5.19 Operation and
Maintenance
Requires City and LACPW to maintain in good working
order and operate as design any facilities, treatment or control systems design to contain and convey sewer.
D.4 Operations and
Maintenance
D.8 System Evaluation,
Capacity Assurance
and Capital Planning
This document serves as the 2025 update to the SSMP approved and adopted by the City Council at a public meeting. Appendix A1 includes documentation of approval by the Board. Appendix A2 includes the General Order.
The sewer-related services that the Districts provide vary from city to city depending on the service agreements. Table 1-2 summarizes the CSMD cities and the sewer-related services currently provided by the LACPW to each of the cities. LACPW applied for coverage under the reissued General Order for facilities it owns, and the CSMD member cities applied for coverage under the reissued General Order for facilities they own.
LACPW and the member cities own the sewer mainlines and the point of connection to the sewer mainlines, but do not own any portion of the sewer lateral beyond the sewer connection.
LACPW, as operator of the CSMD and MSMD, prepares and updates the SSMP for activities the LACPW performs for managing, operating, and maintaining sewer systems including the Districts. The cities, as well as the other County departments serviced by CSMD, as owners of their respective systems, are responsible for preparing and updating an SSMP specific to the collection system owned by those entities. Some cities within the CSMD have either adopted the Los Angeles County Code or have established local ordinances or resolutions governing the performance of items stipulated in the General Order. Cities are responsible for implementing the legal authorities required by the General Order. Cities also are responsible for conducting capacity studies of their collection system when necessary and correcting identified hydraulic deficiencies. The CSMD performs functions required by the General Order related to the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer systems.
A pdf copy of this SSMP is available on the internet at:
LACPW: https://dpw.lacounty.gov/sewer/ssmp.pdf
Bellflower:
https://bellflower.ca.gov/departments/public_works/sewer_maintenance.php
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
| 3
Table 1-2: LACDPW Sewer-Related Services to the 38 CSMD Cities1 City CSMD ACO
Program
Sewer
Maintenance
Agreement
Building
and Safety
Industrial
Waste
City
Engineers
Agoura Hills X X X
Artesia X X X X
Baldwin Park X X
Bellflower X X X
Bell Gardens X X X
Bradbury X X
Calabasas X X X
Carson X X X
Commerce X X X
Cudahy X X X
Diamond Bar X X X
Duarte X X X
Glendora X X
Hawaiian
Gardens
X X X
Hidden Hills X X
Industry X X X
Irwindale X X X
La Cañada
Flintridge
X X X X
La Habra Heights X X
Lakewood X X X X
La Mirada X X X X
Lawndale X X X X
Lomita X X X X
Maywood X X
Montebello X
Palos Verdes
Estates
X X
Paramount X X X
Pico Rivera X X X
Rancho Palos
Verdes
City/Central
X X X
Rolling Hills X X X :.
.
.
:
:
.
.
:
.
i
\A
— ‘-—___
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
| 4
Table 1-2: LACDPW Sewer-Related Services to the 38 CSMD Cities1 City CSMD ACO
Program
Sewer
Maintenance
Agreement
Building
and Safety
Industrial
Waste
City
Engineers
Rolling Hills
Estates
X X X
Rosemead X X X
San Dimas X X X
Santa Clarita X X X
Santa Fe Springs X X X
South El Monte X X
Temple City X X X X
Walnut X X X
Westlake Village X X X X
West Hollywood X X
TOTALS
1Through the General Services Agreement, a city can request LACPW resources upon specific request. LACDPW currently provides at least some degree of service to all 88 cities in the County of Los Angeles.
1.2 SSMP Goal and System Management Objectives
The goal of the SSMP is to provide a plan and schedule to properly manage, operate, and maintain all parts of the collection system. This will help reduce and prevent spills, as well as mitigate any spills that do occur. The City and LACPW has adopted and is dedicated to achieving the following collection system management objectives:
• Proper operation, maintenance, and management of the Districts’ sanitary sewer collection system facilities to reduce the frequency and severity of sewer spills and their potential impacts on public health, safety, and the environment. • Prompt action when sewer spills occur to identify, contain, and remove the cause, promptly report the event to appropriate regulatory authorities, and ensure the public is adequately and timely notified.
• Document all sewer spills and system deficiencies and the remedial actions taken. • Adequately train and equip the Districts’ sewer system operators, employees, contractors, responders, or other agents to address a sewer spill event. • Maintain and repair the Districts’ sewer system to provide adequate capacity to convey base flows and peak flows while meeting or exceeding applicable regulations, laws, and generally accepted practices relative to sanitary sewer system operations and maintenance.
This SSMP documents how the City and LACPW’s collection system practices are integrated toward the achievement of the City’s and LACPW’s objectives. The City’s and
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
| 5
LACPW have identified the following actions to be taken under this SSMP to ensure the accomplishment of these goals:
• Conduct a planned and scheduled maintenance program that will minimize the risk and occurrence of sewer spills, in support of the SSMP goals. • When sewer spills do occur, respond to the reported site in a timely manner and undertake feasible remedial actions to contain the spill to minimize impacts, including stopping the flow from reaching the storm drain, if possible. • Stop the spill as soon as possible and limit public access to the spill area to prevent public contact with any wastewater contamination.
• Recover the spill to the extent feasible and return it to the sewer system and then clean up the contaminated area.
• Gather and compile all pertinent information regarding the spill event, investigate as necessary to determine probable cause, document findings, report to the appropriate regulatory agencies in a timely manner, and file the completed report.
1.3 SSMP Update Schedule
Pursuant to the General Order, CSMD conducts program monitoring and triennial audits of its SSMP, prepares SSMP updates, and implements planned activities to achieve Bellflower and LACPW’s collection system program objectives. Bellflower’s SSMP update was prepared upon completion of the most recent SSMP Program Audit, dated April 15, 2025, and LACPW’s SSMP update.
The schedule for auditing and updating this SSMP is provided in Table 1-3. Element 10 of the SSMP includes a longer-term schedule for SSMP audits and updates.
Table 1-3: SSMP Audit and Update Schedule
Activity Collection System Name SSMP Audit Due Date SSMP Update Due Date
CSMD – City Agoura Hills City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Artesia City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Baldwin Park City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Bell Gardens City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Bellflower City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Bradbury City 2/2/2026 8/2/2026
CSMD – City Calabasas City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Carson City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City City of Industry 2/2/2026 8/2/2026
CSMD – City Commerce City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Cudahy City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
| 6
Table 1-3: SSMP Audit and Update Schedule
Activity Collection System Name SSMP Audit Due Date SSMP Update Due Date
CSMD – City Diamond Bar City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Duarte City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Glendora City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Hawaiian Gardens City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Hidden Hills City 2/2/2026 8/2/2026
CSMD – City La Cañada Flintridge City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025 CSMD – City La Habra Heights City 11/2/2025 5/2/2026
CSMD – City La Mirada City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Lakewood City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Lawndale City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Lomita City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Maywood City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Palos Verdes Estates City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025 CSMD – City Paramount City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Pico Rivera City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Rancho Palos Verdes City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Rancho Palos Verdes City 2/2/2026 8/2/2026
CSMD – City Rolling Hills Estates City 11/2/2025 5/2/2026 CSMD – City Rosemead City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City San Dimas City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Santa Clarita City 11/2/2024 5/2/2025
CSMD – City Santa Fe Springs City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City South El Monte City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Temple City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Walnut City 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD – City Westlake Village City 11/2/2025 5/2/2026
CSMD –
County Zone
Malibu Mesa Zone of the CSMD CS 11/2/2025 5/2/2026
CSMD –
County Zone
Trancas Zone of the CSMD CS 2/2/2026 8/2/2026
CSMD –
County Zone
Unincorporated County Area CSMD
South/County Sanitation District CS
11/2/2024 5/2/2025
CSMD –
County Zone
Unincorporated County Area CSMD
North/County Sanitation District CS
11/2/2025 5/2/2026
CSMD –
County Zone
Unincorporated County Area
CSMD/Las Virgenes Tapia CS
11/2/2025 5/2/2026
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
| 7
Table 1-3: SSMP Audit and Update Schedule
Activity Collection System Name SSMP Audit Due Date SSMP Update Due Date
CSMD –
County Zone
Unincorporated County Area CSMD-
NW/County Sanitation District CS
2/2/2025 8/2/2025
CSMD –
County Zone
Unincorporated County Area Lake
Hughes Zone of the CSMD CS
2/2/2026 8/2/2026
CSMD –
County Zone
Unincorporated County Area
Marina/Aneta Zone of the CSMD/City
Hyperion CS
2/2/2026 8/2/2026
SMA Montebello CS 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
SMA Irwindale City CS 2/2/2026 8/2/2026
SMA West Hollywood CS 2/2/2025 8/2/2025
LACPW plans to complete implementation of several significant initiatives addressing the prevention of sewer spills. Table 1-4 provides a schedule for incorporation of these activities into the Districts’ SSMP program implementation.
Table 1-4: Planned SSMP Implementation Milestones Addressing Prevention of Sewer Spills
Element Milestone Milestone Due
Date
Relevance to Spill Prevention
4 – Operations and
Maintenance
Program
Implementation of
Cityworks asset
management system
June 20261
Improve tracking of system issues
and planning and scheduling of
maintenance activities
4 – Operations and
Maintenance
Program
Implementation of
GraniteNet cloud-
based CCTV software2
November 2027 Improve sharing of condition
assessment data for streamline
decision-making and communication
Specification 5.7 –
Allocation of
Resources
Approval of sewer fee
increase
July 2025 Collect revenue needed to sustain
operations and maintenance service
delivery
8 – System
Evaluation
Initiate Condition
Assessment Program
for remaining pump
stations3
November 2027 Collect information to identify system
condition deficiencies
8 – System
Evaluation
Initiate next cycle of
Condition Assessment
Program for sewer
pipelines
July 20254 Collect information to identify system
condition deficiencies
1Currently anticipated, subject to change
2Software development began in May 2025 for the implementation of the GraniteNet Cloud-based CCTV Software 3Began with the Condition Assessment for pump stations for the City of Diamond Bar. Report was completed in June 2019
4New CCTV contract to begin in July 2025 and continue the 2nd phase of the Condition Assessment project
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
| 8
1.4 Sewer System Asset Overview
Bellflower’s Public Works Department manages the sanitary sewer collection system, which serves a population of approximately 77,400 residents and consists of 98.32 miles of sewer lines. The City's local sewers discharge into the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County facilities for conveyance, treatment, and disposal.
The City has three budgeted management positions directly involved in sewer system responsibilities. The field operation and maintenance services are fulfilled by utilizing the services provided by LACPW.
These personnel, in collaboration with LACPW personnel, administer the City's sewer collection system operation, provide engineering evaluation of proposed and existing sewer facilities, administer preventive maintenance and sewer construction programs, and oversee the maintenance of sewer collection system facilities and related records and plans. Appendix A3 provides a summary of assets for all collection systems.
Other relevant information regarding the City’s collection systems and management program includes:
• Location: Collection systems are located in Los Angeles County. • Service Area Boundary:
•
•
• a and 1-1b shows the geographic service area boundary in the City and Districts. • Community Served: Bellflower covers 6.09 square miles including both residential and commercial areas.
• Data Management Systems: Districts use the following data management systems.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
| 9
o Maximo: LACPW legacy Maintenance Management System (MMS) used for managing maintenance activities. Field crew activities are recorded in various forms such as service requests, cleaning reports, sewer maintenance daily reports, manhole adjustments, overflow report forms, etc., and are stored in the MMS. The LACPW is in the process of implementing Cityworks Maintenance Management System to schedule and track maintenance activities.
o Cityworks: LACPW is implementing Cityworks Maintenance Management System to schedule and track maintenance activities. The condition assessment schedule and eventually closed-circuit television (CCTV) is planned to be added to Cityworks. Cityworks will be used to record what sections have been inspected, the schedule of activities, and whether work has been completed or not. It will also be used to schedule and track fats, oils, and grease (FOG) source control inspections of industrial and commercial establishments.
o HMS: LACPW utilizes the HMS database to maintain records of all sites and their locations under the FOG program. Inspectors document their findings and enter data into the HMS database, which automates the inspection process and is used to track and manage permit inspection and source control data.
o PowerBI: PowerBI is utilized to display spill trends and analysis, as well as city profiles, which include detailed information on manholes, pipes, pump stations, and properties. Additionally, Power BI is used to display productivity reports, detailing maintenance activities for each city. o CCTV Database: Wincan and GraniteNet are used to document inspection events, inspection observations, and associated videos.
These systems serve as the repository for historical CCTV inspection data. LACPW is in the process of linking GraniteNet with Cityworks to maintain CCTV records.
o CADD: As-built plans of the Districts’ facilities are maintained by LACPW for unincorporated Los Angeles County areas and by each city within the CSMD for their own jurisdiction, with LACPW maintaining a copy for maintenance operations. Data gathered from the plans, such as system locations and alignment, pipe material, size, etc., are stored in the SMD’s Computer-Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) System and Geographical Information System (GIS).
o GIS: LACPW utilizes GIS to generate a mapping system that includes sewer features and map base layers such as aerial images, streets, parcels, and storm drain systems also available from other divisions within LACPW, County Departments, and other governmental agencies. o SCADA: Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition system used to collect and store pump station alarm and instrumentation data. o Microsoft Office: Various collection system programs are managed using Microsoft Office applications as an electronic database. Currently,
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
| 10
Office is used to store the schedule for FOG program activities, but this will eventually be performed using Cityworks.
• Lateral Ownership and Operational Responsibilities: LACPW and city do not own any portion of the service lateral. Private service laterals are the responsibility of the property owner and must be maintained by the property owner. Operation and maintenance of the local main sewer lines are the responsibility of LACPW.
Regional trunk sewer lines are the responsibility of the publicly owned treatment works, such as the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (LACSD), for operation and maintenance.
• Breakdown of Service Connections: Bellflower’s breakdown of service connections is roughly 92 percent residential, 6 percent commercial, and remainder 2 percent are industrial, agricultural, recreational, institutional, and miscellaneous use.
• Unique Service Boundary Conditions and Challenges: The service area faces issues with conflicts involving local lines and jurisdictional determinations between agencies like the LACSD and the City of Los Angeles, impacting operations and maintenance.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
| 11
Figure 1-1a: Bellflower Service Area Map
DDNI‘V’IBM Name: SBWSFFGC‘IKIES Manbwk
”mm
rum wt (”’9' 4,5,
l 0 i
i l a
l l vsrnt
I N L05 ANGELES couu'rv
Sewer Facilities
in the City of
Bellflower
Legend
I SMD Manhole
0 Trunk Sewer MH
Gravity
= Siphon
— Trunk Sewer
D Cityof Bellflower
Manholes: 2,097
Sewer footage: 98.32 miles
Pump Stations: 0
D 0.3 0.6 &
Miles
As of Dale: 7I28f2025
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
| 12
Figure 1-2b: CSMD Service Area Map
"—7?! 55‘ ll‘lel
I“ so: ”an” couun
Los Angeles County
Public Works
Sewer Maintenance Districts
Service Areas
- SSMP Applications
Legend
Unino. CounIyAlu csMD semicumy 5am Elam
I Unlnc, eon-mm. cam "mm 5-a am
- 1mm. Coumy Am Annu- Zone om. csuulcm ”mm
- Uninc. Coumym- Lain Hld‘le Zone oflha csw
- Trance: Zane olihe CSMD
- Malian Mesa Zone om CSMD
D mum 2m om. csmo
- Uninc.Ccun1yNu CSMDI LII Vim-III: Tui-
- UrdaountyAnI own-Wan sum mum
Eli en!
E Supmrhl chum
”Willi“ menu-um
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
| 13
1.4.1 Access to Up-to-Date Mapping
LACPW provides public access to up-to-date sewer mapping through their website.
LA County Sanitary Sewer Network GIS Map:
• https://pw.lacounty.gov/smd/sewernetwork/
Operation Maps:
• https://dpw.lacounty.gov/sewer/Page_15
1.5 SSMP Overview
This SSMP complies with the General Order and meets the following General Order objectives:
a) Properly fund, manage, operate and maintain, with adequately trained staff and/or contractors possessing adequate knowledge, skills, and abilities as demonstrated through a validated certification program at all times, all parts of the collection system owned and/or operated by the discharger.
b) Provide adequate capacity to convey base flows and peak flows, including flows during wet weather events, to the minimum design criteria as defined in the discharger’s System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan (a required component of the SSMP), for all parts of the collection system owned and/or operated by the discharger.
c) Take all feasible steps to stop and mitigate the impact of spills in the collection system owned and/or operated by the discharger.
The City together with LACPW achieves these objectives by implementing a comprehensive sewer infrastructure asset management program that is documented in the following 11 SSMP elements:
1. Goal and Introduction
2. Organization
3. Legal Authority
4. Operation and Maintenance Program
5. Design and Performance Provisions
6. Spill Emergency Response Plan
7. Sewer Pipe Blockage Control Program
8. System Evaluation, Capacity Assurance and Capital Improvements
9. Monitoring, Measurement, and Program Modifications
10. SSMP Program Audits
11. Communication Program
When appropriate, the SSMP references other program documentation for greater detail.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
| 14
2 Organization
2.1 Overview
LACPW are governed by the Board of Supervisors, who establish laws and approve all LACPW’s contracts and agreements. LACPW is led by the Director, who sets policies and oversees their implementation. Supporting the Director are the Chief Deputy Director, Assistant Director, Deputy Director, and Assistant Deputy Director, who help manage daily operations and special projects.
The Sewer Maintenance Division (SMD) has 213 budgeted positions. The distribution of the SMD personnel is depicted in the organizational chart presented in Section 2.3.2 of this chapter. These personnel provide engineering evaluations of proposed and existing sewer facilities, administer LACPW’s sewer service charge ordinance, carry out annexation proceedings for new territories, form and dissolve service zones, maintain facility record plans, and administer preventive maintenance and sewer construction programs.
Key roles include the Principal Engineer and the Senior Civil Engineers, who manage engineering and field staff. There is a Senior Civil Engineer designated for office engineering and budget, field operations team for pump stations, and field operations team for the gravity system. The gravity system unit includes the Regional Sewer Maintenance Superintendent and Sewer Maintenance Supervisor, who assists the Senior Civil Engineer and oversee sewer maintenance activities, with field crews performing the actual maintenance work. For the pump station unit, the Electro-Mechanic Supervisors and their teams handle pump station operations. Office Administrative and clerical assistants are part of all units and assist in the preparation of the SMD budget, Board letters, and other correspondence, and are responsible for the sewer service charge direct assessments.
Other divisions within the LACPW are currently and will continue to be responsible for carrying out some of the compliance actions called for by the Wastewater Discharge Requirements (WDRs) for the LACPW. The key support divisions and their responsibilities are described below:
• Workforce Support Division: Responsible for procuring equipment, materials, and supplies needed for day-to-day operations and maintenance activities; printing and mailing public education outreach program materials. • Business Relations and Contracts Division: Responsible for procuring contract services for engineering, emergency sewer repair projects, and closed-circuit televising of sewer lines.
• Building and Safety Division (BSD): Responsible for issuing permits for sewer connections. May also enforce Plumbing Codes involving proper connections, maintenance of sewer house laterals, and preventing illegal discharges into public sewers upon City contract.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
• Sewer Maintenance Division (SMD): Responsible for administering the Districts including operation and maintenance of the sewer systems, repairs and rehabilitation, and providing regulatory compliance.
• Environmental Programs Division (EPD): Responsible for enforcing the Districts’ Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) program, including point source control, inspection of industrial waste and grease-generating facilities, investigation of illicit discharges of chemicals, debris, etc., into the public sewer, and conducting water quality monitoring for spills of 50,000 gallons or more to surface water. • Stormwater Maintenance Division: Assists the Districts’ crew in tracing, containing, and cleaning up spills that reach a storm drain system. • Emergency Management Group: Responsible for operating the Emergency Operation Center for the entire Department, including handling service calls, spills, and pump station malfunction calls for the Districts.
• Human Resources Division: Responsible for staffing the Districts and training personnel.
• Design Division: Responsible for developing design standards and criteria for capital improvements.
• Project Management Division III (PMD III): Responsible for providing project management services for the construction of capital improvements. • Land Development Division (LDD): Responsible for subdivision plan checks to ensure compliance with County standards for the construction of new sewer collection systems. Reviews sewer capacity studies for proposed lines and sets requirements to ensure adequate capacity in existing systems. • Survey/Mapping and Property Management Division: Responsible for processing access easement documents and procuring easements for public sewer facilities located on private properties. Also responsible for investigating spill-related claims and litigations against the SMD.
City of Bellflower is governed by the City Council, who establishes new and amending existing ordinances and policies governing the municipal operations and the operation of the City’s sanitary sewer system, including the approvals of all SO&M contracts and agreements, to protect the community’s interest. The City Manager for the City is responsible for the overall management and application of all legal and policy directives that relate to the City’s activities, including the operation and maintenance of the City’s sanitary sewer system. The Director of Public Works directs the accomplishment of statutory and policy criteria within the scope of the City Council’s policy and legal requirements. Directs its execution and evaluates work accomplished within his areas of responsibility including the SO&M program. Also directs the planning, budgeting, design for the construction of a new sewer collection system, and rehabilitation of the existing sewer collection system. Facilitates all sewer collection system operation and maintenance activities through the contract with LACPW as the City’s representative.
Responsible for the day-to-day management and operation oversight of the City’s sewer collection system, including the three sewer pump stations. Supporting the Director are
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
the Assistant Director, City Engineer, Maintenance Superintendent and Office Administrative and Clerical Assistants.
Their responsibilities include:
• Assistant Director - In the absence of the Director, assumes the responsibilities above.
• City Engineer – Performs or oversees engineering activities relating to studies, design, investigations, and the preparation of reports. May perform special studies, investigations and reports concerning sewer infrastructure. • Maintenance Superintendent - Has oversight of all contracted maintenance and repair services for the City’s facilities.
• Office Administration and Clerical Assistant – Assist in the preparation of reports, budgets, and other correspondence; liaisons with LACDPW regarding sewer maintenance; respond to public inquires and service requests. The distribution of the City personnel is depicted in the organizational chart presented in Section 2.3.2 of this chapter.
2.2 Authorized Representatives
The Director of Public Works for Belflower and the Assistant Deputy Director for the SMD are responsible for the execution of the compliance actions required under the WDRs.
This includes, but is not limited to, signing and certification of all reports and correspondence as required under this order. The Principal Engineer and Senior Civil Engineers in SMD may also perform these duties on behalf of the SMD’s Assistant Deputy Director or Director of Public Works for Bellflower.
The Sewer Maintenance Districts has following staff authorized to serve as Onsite Managers for the collection systems managed by LACPW:
• Andrew Ngumba, Assistant Deputy Director (Primary LRO for LACPW) • Alex Villarama, Principal Civil Engineer (Secondary LRO for LACPW) • Jeffrey Bouse, Senior Civil Engineer
• Voltaire Llana, Senior Civil Engineer
• May Hong, Civil Engineer
• Eric Liu, Civil Engineer
Each of these staff members is authorized to act on behalf of each of LACPW’s collection system to serve as Legally Responsible Officials for each of the collection systems listed in Table 2-1. District LROs coordinate to ensure one of the designated LROs is available for required reporting certification in CIWQS. In addition, each collection system in the County owned by a city also has at least one Legally Responsible Official from that city’s staff.
Bellflower Legally Responsible Official:
Ryan Smoot, City Manager (Primary LRO for City)
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
Len Gorecki, Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works (Secondary LRO for City) Table 2-1: Collection Systems Operated, Maintained and Managed by Los Angeles County Public Works
WDID Type2 CIWQS WDID CIWQS Collection System Name
CSMD – City 4SSO11366 Agoura Hills City
CSMD – City 4SSO10364 Artesia City
CSMD – City 4SSO10366 Baldwin Park City
CSMD – City 4SSO10368 Bell Gardens City
CSMD – City 4SSO10369 Bellflower City
CSMD – City 4SSO10371 Bradbury City
CSMD – City 4SSO11447 Calabasas City
CSMD – City 4SSO10374 Carson City
CSMD – City 4SSO10394 City of Industry
CSMD – City 4SSO10377 Commerce City
CSMD – City 4SSO10380 Cudahy City
CSMD – City 4SSO10382 Diamond Bar City
CSMD – City 4SSO10384 Duarte City
CSMD – City 4SSO10389 Glendora City
CSMD – City 4SSO10390 Hawaiian Gardens City
CSMD – City 4SSO11439 Hidden Hills City
CSMD – City 4SSO10397 La Cañada Flintridge City
CSMD – City 4SSO10398 La Habra Heights City
CSMD – City 4SSO10399 La Mirada City
CSMD – City 4SSO10402 Lakewood City
CSMD – City 4SSO10403 Lawndale City
CSMD – City 4SSO10404 Lomita City
CSMD – City 4SSO10409 Maywood City
CSMD – City 4SSO10414 Palos Verdes Estates City
2 CSMD – Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District
MSMD – Marina Sewer Maintenance District
SMA – Sewer Maintenance Agreement
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
Table 2-1: Collection Systems Operated, Maintained and Managed by Los Angeles County Public Works
WDID Type2 CIWQS WDID CIWQS Collection System Name
CSMD – City 4SSO10415 Paramount City
CSMD – City 4SSO10417 Pico Rivera City
CSMD – City 4SSO10420 Rancho Palos Verdes City
CSMD – City 4SSO18098 Rancho Palos Verdes City
CSMD – City 4SSO10423 Rolling Hills Estates City
CSMD – City 4SSO10424 Rosemead City
CSMD – City 4SSO10425 San Dimas City
CSMD – City 4SSO10429 Santa Clarita City
CSMD – City 4SSO10430 Santa Fe Springs City
CSMD – City 4SSO10434 South El Monte City
CSMD – City 4SSO10437 Temple City
CSMD – City 4SSO10441 Walnut City
CSMD – City 4SSO11407 Westlake Village City
CSMD – County Zone 4SSO10465 Malibu Mesa Zone of the CSMD CS CSMD – County Zone 4SSO10496 Trancas Zone of the CSMD CS CSMD – County Zone 4SSO11365 Unincorporated County Area CSMD South/County Sanitation District CS
CSMD – County Zone 4SSO11370 Unincorporated County Area CSMD North/County Sanitation District CS
CSMD – County Zone 4SSO11372 Unincorporated County Area CSMD/Las Virgenes Tapia CS
CSMD – County Zone 4SSO11374 Unincorporated County Area CSMD-NW/County Sanitation District CS
CSMD – County Zone 6SSO10459 Unincorporated County Area Lake Hughes Zone of the CSMD CS
CSMD – County Zone 4SSO11373 Unincorporated County Area Marina/Aneta Zone of the CSMD/City Hyperion CS
SMA 4SSO10411 Montebello CS
SMA 4SSO10396 Irwindale City CS
SMA 4SSO11368 West Hollywood CS
/_
\
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
2.3 Positions Responsible for Implementing Specific SSMP Elements
2.3.1 Positions Responsible
A list of positions responsible for implementing specific SSMP elements is provided in Table 2-2. Additionally, Appendix B1 contains a list of staff responsible for implementing specific SSMP elements, including position, telephone number and email address.
Table 2-2: Positions Responsible for SSMP
SSMP Element Responsible Org. Unit Responsible Position
1. Introduction and Goal Sewer Maintenance Division/
City of Bellflower Public Works
Department
Division Manager and
City’s PW Manager
2. Organization Sewer Maintenance Division/
City of Bellflower Public Works
Department
Division Manager and
City’s PW Manager
3. Legal Authorities Sewer Maintenance Division/
City of Bellflower Public Works
Department
Division Manager and
City’s PW Manager
4. Operation and Maintenance Program -
Pipelines
Sewer Maintenance Division Principal Civil Engineer,
Pipelines
4. Operation and Maintenance Program – Pump
Stations
Sewer Maintenance Division Senior Civil Engineer,
Treatment Plants and
Pump Stations
5. Design and Performance Provisions - Design City of Bellflower Public Works Department
City’s Engineer
5. Design and Performance Provisions – Design -
Construction
City of Bellflower Public Works
Department
City’s Engineer
6. Spill Emergency Response Plan Sewer Maintenance Division Principal Civil Engineer, Pipelines
7. Sewer Pipe Blockage Control Program Environmental Programs Division
Division Manager
8. System Evaluation, Capacity Assurance and
Capital Improvements – Condition Assessment
and Prioritization of Corrective Actions
Sewer Maintenance Division Senior Civil Engineer,
Technical Services
8. System Evaluation, Capacity Assurance and
Capital Improvements – Capacity Assurance
City of Bellflower Public Works
Department
Public Works Director
8. System Evaluation, Capacity Assurance and
Capital Improvements – Capital Improvement
Plan
City of Bellflower Public Works
Department
Public Works Director
9. Monitoring, Measurement and Program
Modifications
Sewer Maintenance Division/
City of Bellflower Public Works
Department
Division Manager and
City’s PW Manager
Um
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
2.3.2 Lines of Authority
Figure 2-1, Figure 2-2a, and Figure 2-2b includes an SSMP Program Implementation organization chart showing the lines of authority for the positions responsible for the management of the collection system and implementation of the SSMP. The contact information for the Sewer Maintenance Division staff and City’s staff listed in Figure 2-2 can be found in Appendix B2.
Figure 2-1: LACPW Organizational Chart
Table 2-2: Positions Responsible for SSMP
SSMP Element Responsible Org. Unit Responsible Position
10. Internal Audit Sewer Maintenance Division/
City of Bellflower Public Works
Department
Division Manager and
City’s PW Manager
11. Communication Program Sewer Maintenance Division/
City of Bellflower Public Works
Department
Division Manager and
City’s PW Manager
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
SSMP PROGRAM ORGANIZATION CHART
EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT & GOVERNING BOARD
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
Figure 2-2a: SMD Organizational Chart
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
SSMP PROGRAM ORGANIZATION CHART
Sewer Maintenance Districts
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
Figure 2-2b: City Organizational Chart
2.4 Spill Reporting Chain of Communication
LACPW’s Spill Emergency Response Plan, described in Element 6 and included in Appendix F1, includes procedures for effective communication and reporting of spills from receipt of complaint, including the person responsible for reporting spills into the State Water Board’s CIWQS database. The Spill Emergency Response Plan includes a flowchart and notification table providing clear step-by-step procedures for communication and reporting. Figure 2-3 summarizes the spill reporting chain of communication during normal business hours. Normal Business hours are Monday through Friday from 6:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Figure 2-4 summarizes the spill reporting chain of communication during afterhours.
ORGANIZAHONAL CHART FOR SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT
CITY OF BELLFLOWER
Srpporl Unils
Administration
[Filer-ice)
(3i Council
I
Cily Manager
I I
Director of
Piblic Worls
LACPW - - ‘ Ma'ntenance D' _ _ Public Worlrs Manager Crly Engneer T—l
Mminislralive Support Public Works Division
Heads
Planning (Billing & Safety) (Code Enfacemerrt}
County of Los Angelos
Sherilf's Deparlrnent
County of Los Angeles Frre
0696mm
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
Figure 2-3: Spill Reporting Chain of Communication – Normal Business Hours
*Normal Business hours are Monday through Friday from 6:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Figure 2-4: Spill Reporting Chain of Communication – After Hours
*After Hours are any hours that are not Normal Business Hours.
County
Dispatch
•Receives Call
•Dispatches Field Crew
SMD Field
Crew
•Responds to Spill
•Documents Field Spill Report
SMD
Supervisor
or Supt
•Reviews Field Spill Report
CIWQS
Data
Submitter
•Request Additional Information from Field Staff, if needed •Enters Draft CIWQS Spill Report
CIWQS
LRO
•Review Draft CIWQS Spill Report
•Certifies Report
County
Dispatch
•Receives Call
•Dispatches Field Crew
On-Call
Supervisor
or Supt
•Investigates Spill
Standby
SMD Field
Crew
•Responds to Spill
•Documents Field Spill Report
SMD
Supervisor
or Supt
•Reviews Field Spill Report
CIWQS
Data
Submitter
•Request Additional Information from Field Staff, if needed •Enters Draft CIWQS Spill Report
CIWQS
LRO
•Review Draft CIWQS Spill Report
•Certifies Report
'v
v
v
v
vv
v
v
v
v
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
3 Legal Authority
3.1 Overview
The City's legal authority to own and operate a sanitary sewer system is derived from its incorporation as a City. The City on February 26, 1958, granted the LACPW the consent and jurisdiction to annex portions of the City’s sewer system into the CSMD. By that action, the City has entrusted the management, operation, and maintenance of its local sanitary sewer system to the CSMD. The City, however, still maintains ownership of the sewer system.
The legal authorities for the specific areas stipulated in the General Order are covered in various sections of the City Municipal Codes (CMCs). The City has adopted the 2022 California Plumbing Code and The Los Angeles County Title 20 – Utilities, which regulates sanitary sewers and industrial waste in in the County as its Sanitary Sewer and Industrial Waste Ordinance.
• Bellflower Municipal Code - https://ecode360.com/BE4904 • Plumbing Code Chapter 15.12 - https://ecode360.com/43106437#43106437 • Sanitary Sewers and Industrial Waste Chapter 13.08 –
https://ecode360.com/BE4904/search?query=industrial%20waste&scope=all&s ortOrder=relevance
The Districts were formed pursuant to Chapter 4 of the State of California Health and Safety Code (Section H4870 – 8), with the County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors acting as their governing body. By law, the Board of Supervisors may make and enforce all rules and regulations necessary for the administration of the Districts and for the cleaning, repair, construction, rehabilitation, renewal, replacement, operation, and maintenance of collection sewers within the Districts. Consistent with the law, several ordinances have been established by the Board of Supervisors to govern all aspects of the Districts' operations. The legal authorities for the specific areas stipulated in the WDRs are covered in various sections of the Los Angeles County Plumbing Code (LACO Plumbing Code) and Chapters 20.20, 20.24, 20.26, 20.32, 20.34, 20.36, and 20.40 of the Los Angeles County Code (LACO Code) Title 20 – Utilities, some of which are discussed below. Table 3-1 and Table 3-2 summarizes these authorities and relates them to elements of the SSMP that are impacted or utilize these authorities. Specific legal authorities are described in more detail in the elements that follow.
For the contracted cities that have service agreements with the Districts, the provision of services is dependent on the specific terms of the agreement. It is assumed that the legal authorities are extended to the Districts to provide services to these cities.
The LACO Code, LACO Plumbing Codes, standard plans, specifications, and other materials cited in this Section are filed at the office of the Director of Public Works and can be found online in the links below:
• Los Angeles County Code
( https://library.municode.com/ca/los_angeles_county/codes/code_of_ordinances)
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
• Los Angeles County Plumbing Code
( https://library.municode.com/ca/los_angeles_county/codes/code_of_ordinances ?nodeId=TIT28PLCO)
Table 3-1: Summary of Legal Authorities Relating Legal Authority Element of General Order
Requirement Reference
Prevent illicit discharges into the wastewater
collection system
LACO 20.24.020 – Applicability of Division 2 provisions LACO 20.24.200 – Notification of uncontrolled discharges required
LACO 20.32.080 – Excessive discharge of sewage –
Conditional permit requirements
LACO 20.32.650 – Dumping of effluent - Conditions
LACO 20.36.010 – Discharge of offensive or damaging
substances prohibited
LACO 20.36.400 – Deposit of certain substances prohibited CPC 714.1 – Unlawful Practices
CPC 714.2 – Prohibited Water Discharge
Collaborate with storm sewer agencies to
coordinate emergency spill responses, ensure
access to storm sewer systems during spill
events, and prevent unintentional cross
connections of sanitary sewer infrastructure to
storm sewer infrastructure
The City is part of Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District, which is managed by LACPW. All City spills will flow to City storm drainage system and then to the County flood control system. CSMD and the Flood Control District are both part of Los Angeles County Public Works and staff have direct contact with one another to coordinate and access additional resources and support, if needed
Require that sewers and connection be
properly designed and constructed
LACO 20.32.010 – Sewer construction permit required when – Period of validity
LACO 20.32.330 – New main sewer lines
LACO 20.32.340 – Water pollution control and sewage
pumping plants
LACO 20.32.350 – New house laterals
LACO 20.32.390 – Dedication of sewers
LACO 20.32.580 – Materials and construction – Conformity with standard specifications
LACO 20.30.590 – Inspection by county engineer
Ensure access for maintenance, inspection,
and/or repairs for portions of the service
lateral owned or maintained by the Agency
LACO 20.20.130 – House lateral
LACO 20.24.080 – Maintenance of sewer and laterals
The City does not own or maintain any portion of the house lateral. The house lateral is the part of the sewer piping within the street or right-of-way extending from the property or sewer right-of-way line to point of connection with the main-line sewer Enforce any violations of its sewer ordinances,
service agreements, and/or other legally
binding procedures
LACO 20.24.100 – Enforcement—County engineer powers
LACO 20.24.110 – Delegation of powers
LACO 20.24.160 – Violation – Penalty
LACO 20.24.170 – Continued violations
Obtain easement accessibility agreements for
locations requiring sewer system operations
and maintenance, as applicable
LACO 20.32.240 – Sewer easement processing fees
LACO 20.32.430 – Sewer easement requirements
Table 3-2: Summary of Legal Authorities Relating Sewer Pipe Blockage Control Program Element of General Order
Requirement Reference
Requirements to install grease removal
devices (such as traps or interceptors)
LACO 20.36.560 – Installation – Required when
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
Table 3-1: Summary of Legal Authorities Relating Legal Authority Element of General Order
Requirement Reference
Design standards for the grease removal
devices
LACO 20.36.570 – Pretreatment – Standards and criteria
Maintenance requirements, BMP
requirements, record keeping and reporting
requirements for grease removal devices
LACO 20.36.610 – Operation and maintenance
Industrial Waste Permits – Authorities enable the inclusion of additional specific maintenance requirements on Industrial Waste Permits provided to food service establishments.
Authority to inspect grease producing
facilities
LACO 20.24.090 – Inspection to ascertain compliance—Access required—Acceptance of permit conditions
LACO 20.24.150 – Interference with inspectors prohibited when
LACO 20.36.620 – Inspection and testing
LACO 20.36.630 – Right of entry for inspection authorized when
3.2 Authority to Prevent Illicit Industrial Waste Discharges into the Collection System
The LACO Plumbing Code Title 28 (Sections 306.2, 714.2, and 1101.2) prohibits the unauthorized discharge of rain, surface, or subsurface water into the collection system.
The illegal dumping of offensive or damaging substances such as chemicals and debris, which are considered inflows, is prohibited by LACO Code, Section 20.36.010.
3.2.1 Prevention of Illicit Discharge of FOG
Section 20.36.400 of the LACO Code prohibits the discharge of Fats, Oils, and Grease and other substances that may, among other things, clog, obstruct, fill, or necessitate frequent repairs, cleaning out, or flushing of sewer facilities in the sewer system.
3.2.2 Prevention of Illicit Discharge of Infiltration/Inflow LACPW have an Inflow/Infiltration (I/I) control program as part of their ongoing sewer line cleaning and maintenance program, which includes closed-circuit television and other mechanisms to detect I/I. By ordinance, the Board of Supervisors has established a financial plan to ensure capital replacement or rehabilitation of sewer lines prone to I/I within the Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District (LACO Code, Section 20.40.045).
The Marina Sewer Maintenance District provides adequate funding to eliminate I/I sources in the mainline sewers and manholes.
The LACO Code, Section 20.24.080, requires property owners to maintain their house laterals, including the elimination of cracks, tree roots, and other debris. A similar requirement is found in Section 101.3.2 of the LACO Plumbing Code Title 28.
3.3 Authority to Collaborate with Storm Sewer Agencies
Spills from the City collection systems flow into City storm drainage systems and Los Angeles County Flood Control drainage systems. When spills occur from collection
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
systems in unincorporated areas, flow either goes directly into the County storm drain system or enters a local cities storm drain system, eventually discharging into the Los Angeles County Flood Control’s storm drain system. Los Angeles County Public Health requires all cities in the Districts to report sewer spills that reach a drainage system within 15 minutes of knowledge of the event. As a result, Los Angeles County Flood Control is notified and can provide support to provide information and access to County drainage system facilities, if needed. The Sewer Maintenance Division, being a sister division to Stormwater Maintenance Divisions that manages the Flood Control System, allows for direct collaboration, allowing for efficient management and resolution of spills and drainage issues.
With regards to preventing cross connections of sanitary sewer infrastructure to storm sewer infrastructure, cities are responsible for connections and either have their own permitting services or are under the services of the LACPW’s Building and Safety Division (BSD). Unincorporated areas work directly with the BSD for permitting.
3.4 Authority to Require Proper Design and Construction of Sewers
The LACO Code Sections 20.32.330 and 20.32.340 require that the design of new mainline sewers and pumping plants, respectively, be in conformity with requirements of Part 3 of Chapter 20.32 of the LACO Code. Similarly, Section 20.32.350 of the LACO Code requires that the design of new house laterals conform to the requirements of Part 3, Chapter 20.32 of the LACO Code unless otherwise covered by the LACO Plumbing Code, Title 28. The construction of a collection sewer system, by law (LACO Code 20.32.580), is required to conform to all the requirements prescribed by Division 2 of the LACO Code, by the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Green Book) and by the Special Provisions and Standard Plans, all on file in the office of the Director of Public Works (County Engineer). The inspection and construction of mainline sewers and pumping plants to ensure proper construction is covered under Section 20.32.590 of the LACO Code. The construction of house laterals is covered under the LACO Plumbing Code.
3.5 Authority to Ensure Access to Publicly Owned Portion of Lateral
The City and County do not own or maintain private lateral sewer lines. Property owners are responsible for proper installation, operation, and maintenance laterals (the pipe that connects from the building to the main) and clean-outs (which provide access to clean and repair the pipe from the building to the main). This includes laterals on the County-owned easement.
3.6 Limit the Authority to Discharge of FOG and other
Debris
The Director of Public Works under the LACO Plumbing Code, Title 28, has the legal authority to require the installation of grease interceptors at restaurants and other food
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
establishments that generate grease. Section 20.36.560 of LACO Code also gives the Director of Public Works the authority to require the installation of treatment facilities, including grease interceptors, at any facility that generates FOG in the amount that will damage or increase the maintenance costs of the sewer collection system.
The LACO Code Section 20.24.090 gives the Director of Public Works the legal authority to inspect mainline sewers, sewage pumping plants, interceptors, etc., as often as he deems necessary, to ascertain whether such facilities are maintained and operated in accordance with the provisions of Division 2 of the LACO Code. Authority to Enforce Violations of Sewer Ordinances
Under Section 20.24.100 of the LACO Code, the Director of Public Works is empowered to enforce all of the requirements prescribed in Division 2 – Sanitary Sewers and Industrial Waste of the Code and in accordance with Section 20.24.110 may delegate this authority.
LACO Code Section 20.24.160 allows criminal penalties for any violations of the Sewer and Industrial Waste Ordinances.
3.7 Authority to Obtain Easement Accessibility Agreements When Applicable
Title 20, Division 2 of the LACO Code gives the LACPW the legal right to set requirements that allow unrestricted maintenance access to the public sewer infrastructure. This access is secured through the LACPW unwavering enforcement of the requirement for sewer easements around all public sewer appurtenances located in private properties. These easements are detailed by the designer on the sewer construction plans and are reviewed through the iterative plan check process. Plan checkers take special care to ensure that maintenance crews will have room for access and equipment usage for both routine maintenance and replacement or repair construction as necessary. Title 20 requires easements to be free of obstruction, and this is reiterated on all sewer plans that contain easements. The potential for conflict or restriction of access is reviewed exhaustively during plan check.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
4 Operation and Maintenance Program
4.1 Up-to-Date Map of the Collection System
LACPW gathers as-built plans and compiles into a central Document Management System, CADD System, and GIS system maintained by the Districts. For unincorporated areas, LACPW maintains the as-builts. For CSMD cities, each city is responsible for maintaining as-built maps and the LACPW collects a copy for maintenance operations.
Data gathered from the plans, such as system locations and alignment, pipe material, size, etc., are stored in LACPW’s Computer-Aided Design and Drafting System and Geographical Information System.
4.1.1 Procedures for Maintaining and Providing Access to Water Boards Staff
LACPW provides access to up-to-date maps of the sewer system via:
• Interactive GIS-maps
• Electronically available as-builts
• Printed and electronically available Map Books
GIS Maps
The interactive GIS-based map of the sewer system is available online on the LACPW’s website:
• https://dpw.lacounty.gov/smd/sewernetwork/
Within GIS, the Districts maintains a mapping system as seen in Figure 4-1 that includes sewer features such as pipe or manhole location, diameter, material, flow direction, etc.
The system includes map base layers such as aerial images, streets, parcels, and storm drain systems also available from other Divisions within LACPW and other governmental agencies. The maps are regularly updated to reflect any changes in the system. Once Cityworks is implemented, valves will be included into the system map.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
Figure 4-1: CSMD Sewer Network Map
Sewer As-Builts
Sewer as-builts can be obtained from the City and/or LACPW. To retrieve the as-builts, LACPW has provided detailed instructions on how to locate the as-builts for a desired sewer line on the SMD webpage. Using the sewer network map to obtain the overlay operation map book, the map book lists the as-built sewer plan number that can be searched on LACPW’s Land Record Site, see Figure 4-2.
The sewer as-builts are located on LACPW’s Land Record site:
• https://pw.lacounty.gov/smpm/landrecords/SewerPlans.aspx Layers
ScwcrNetwork
”\ I'Hnm\m.um
\ \NaLlL-éct ncsummw ‘
D Directionobw
Sum Liner.
\ Nuu‘m: IM mpu
\ N M 5M1"! 9.
\ mm; MnnlMX-i
7" Irunlf-‘w'lu .
SMDOperationsMap
”j (m Ilz/umL-q
E IALmn” M‘mwlv
LACwntyBomdary
j mun/sum
_ —
E LA County Sanitary Sewer Network - Consolidated Sewer M... v ‘ Entermas , Q < , .,, 7,
E
MW" NnnMn/ rm"
E
[m AnjrlL-a
Thoutlnd ,.-.k-
Liam: Mwu ‘sm Pm ‘Oflcufllnlgl
’ Hill-
‘ Jump. 0
gnmbwfl' sub em
:"x Tan-17M mun». “Ar-uni.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
Figure 4-2: Sewer Plans Webpage
Map Books
Printed system maps are stored in the Mapping and Annexation Unit of the SMD located at 1000 South Fremont Avenue, Alhambra, California. These maps are also distributed to the SMD’s field crew, for work scheduling and responding to emergencies, and to cities and other agencies. Individual map books can be found using the operation maps overview map as seen in Figure 4-3.
These map book pages are electronically available on the LACPW’s website:
• https://dpw.lacounty.gov/sewer/Page_15
fl-‘§ pu/IZIL' 14/672465 Residents Businesses 7, AboutUs , ‘7...— r __ _
run than I
El Sewer Plans
MmdSI-nq
MW ' Thesewerplansbebware "“ atmis ‘r a and " maybe L" ‘mmthe ‘ ‘ below. \fiewtheam fmflpmm' mummnlogelmesmetmalwversyourarea.Openmecvedaysheeflormatpageandloealemesewernmber.Se-uels arslisbdbyfl'lenumbergivenPC.Cl,etc. Ifyoudonotfindmesewerplanyouarebokingfor.youmayneedtooontaclflwcflyhat the sewer and property is localed within. County contract cities are Arlesia, Carson, Commerce, La Mirada. Lakewood, Lomila, and Temple City.
Book m1 Book P003503 ‘ Book P007000 Book Pcmouo
Book P0005!) Book PW Bow P007511) Book PCIDSOO
Book P001000 Book POD-1500 Book Foam Book PC11CDO
Book P0015!” Book Pm Bock PM Book P011500
Book Pm Bock P005500 Butt Pm Bod! PC1203!)
Book P0025“) Book PW '
M
Fotlssues, ‘ or mm " amailIhe
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
Figure 4-3: Operations Map Overview Map
4.1.2 Availability of Up-to-Date Mapping to Support Collection System Management
LACPW’s print map books for sewer maintenance crews to use in the field for locating sewer infrastructure. When discrepancies are identified in sewer mapping, crews note them on printed map pages or through GIS on a phone and forward them to SMD GIS resources for updates. Field crews have access to both paper maps and the GIS phone application, depending on their preference.
Cityworks will eventually be downloaded onto cell phones and new LACPW’s tablets, allowing crews to access facility information in real-time and log operation and maintenance activities directly into the system.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
4.2 Preventive Maintenance Program
LACPW’s maintenance services are provided from six maintenance yards strategically located within the County of Los Angeles for efficient management of maintenance activities including spills and other emergencies. A map showing locations of the field maintenance yards and pump stations in Appendix D.
The cornerstone of LACPW’s maintenance operation is the Preventive Maintenance Program as described in LACPW’s training guide maintained in each of the field maintenance yards. This program consists of regular inspection of the sewer system including manholes, pipes, siphons, pump stations, treatment plants, regular cleaning, repair, and related activities. This program is designed and carried out to detect and correct potential problems before they develop into major problems. The Preventative Maintenance Program is implemented through the following key activities:
• CCTV Inspection
• Sewer Line and Manhole Visual Inspection
• Gas Trap Manholes and Siphons
• Drop Manholes
• Sewer Line Cleaning
• Root Foaming
• Periodic Maintenance
• Vermin and Odor Control
• Sewage Pump Stations
The Preventive Maintenance Program utilizes LACPW’s Sewer Maintenance Division Maintenance and Operations Manual, which describes these activities in detail. This manual is available on the SMD’s webpage:
• https://dpw.lacounty.gov/sewer/maintenanceandoperationmanual.pdf For each activity, the tasks and their frequency are determined either periodically, while others are determined based on inspection findings and yard determinations. The descriptions of inspection and maintenance activities and the frequencies for each activity are detailed below.
4.2.1 CCTV Inspection
Closed-circuit television (CCTV) inspections of sewer pipes are conducted to investigate and diagnose issues. Factors such as maintenance history, past overflow records, sewer line locations, and age are used to determine which pipes will be televised.
Additionally, LACPW implements CCTV inspections at a programmatic level through the Condition Assessment Program. This program aims to perform CCTV inspections and structurally rate approximately 500 miles of sewer infrastructure each year. Inspections are prioritized based on the number of spills per 100 miles for each jurisdiction.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
4.2.2 Sewer Line and Manhole Visual Inspection
The interior and exterior of manholes are inspected twice a year for any structural defects, sewage flow condition, presence of vermin or rodents, deleterious industrial waste, odors, and any signs of unusual settlement around or evidence of debris within the manholes and along sewer alignments.
4.2.3 Gas Trap Manholes and Siphons
In the south area, gas traps are inspected and cleared of any stoppages or flow restrictions every 6 months. In other parts of the County, they are inspected and cleared of any blockages on a monthly basis. Siphons may differ in timeframe depending on the type of lines but are generally performed monthly.
4.2.4 Drop Manholes
These facilities are inspected and cleared of stoppages and flow restrictions on a variable frequency and are dependent on prior inspection. The inspection cycle of the drop manholes aligns with the manhole inspection cycle in Section 4.2.2.
4.2.5 Sewer Line Cleaning
Sewer lines are cleaned by hydro jet or rodding. Frequency of cleaning is based on inspection records. Sewer lines known to accumulate grease, garbage grinds, or sand are put on monthly, quarterly, or semi-annual cleaning schedule and those prone to root growth are periodically rodded or chemically treated.
4.2.6 Root Foaming
Root foaming is performed on main sewer lines based on root intrusion and need, usually associated with overflowing. The frequency of root foaming is initially 1 year, then increases to an 18-to-24-month frequency.
4.2.7 Periodic Maintenance
Periodic Maintenance (PMs) are sites that require higher-frequency cleanings due to maintenance issues. These "hot spots" are identified in the field during maintenance and inspections of sewer facilities and are often caused by debris, root intrusion, or other factors. Segments that experience spills are also added under periodic maintenance.
4.2.8 Vermin and Odor Control
When evidence of infestations is observed during an inspection or a service request or complaint is received, sewers and structures are dusted or baited. Sewers infested by insects are chemically treated.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
4.2.9 Treatment Plants and Pumping Stations
The majority of the LACPW’s pump stations are equipped with SCADA/alarm systems and are inspected at least once a week. Pumps and motors are lubricated, control mechanisms and valves are checked and adjusted as necessary, and equipment is repaired or modified as required.
Treatment Plants are inspected daily to comply with permit-required sampling and testing and perform routine maintenance. The equipment is cleaned and calibrated, and mechanical components and process units are checked.
4.3 Scheduling and Data Collection
Historically, LACPW generated and tracked work orders using the Maximo Maintenance Management System. The LACPW is in the process of implementing Cityworks Maintenance Management System to schedule and track maintenance activities. The activities the field crew performs are recorded in various forms such as service requests, cleaning reports, sewer maintenance daily reports, manhole adjustments, overflow report forms, etc., and are stored in the maintenance management system. All the asset inventory documenting maintenance activities and data collected are transferred over to the Cityworks maintenance management system to aid in the electronic filing and tracking.
4.4 Training
LACPW’s staff responsible for the operation and maintenance of the sewer collection system attend formalized training classes or seminars provided by agencies such as California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (CALOSHA), California Water Environment Association (CWEA), and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW). Through this training, staff are well-versed in the latest industry, the best practices for safely and efficiently performing their tasks. Training is required for new staff and when new procedures are introduced.
LACPW also utilizes informal training approaches, including tailgate meetings, monthly safety meetings, and apprenticeship training programs led by higher-level staff. New Legally Responsible Officials and staff responsible for submitting data are informally instructed by an internal reporting expert. Additionally, only companies with well-trained and experienced staff are considered for either emergency spill mitigation or sewer construction and rehabilitation work.
The Sewer Operations Superintendents manage field operations and maintenance activities and are responsible for making sure all collection system field employees receive training in emergency response, spill investigation, and spill reporting duties. LACPW maintains records for all SERP-related training. The date, content, trainers, and attendees are recorded for all scheduled training courses.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
With regards to spill response training and spill volume estimation training, the field crews operate a large system with enough spill events to provide opportunities for senior crew members to provide live-drill training for new and less experienced staff. When these events occur, new crew members are invited to observe until they can perform activities on their own. This on-the-job training involves shadowing experienced crew members and learning directly on site, rather than through drills.
To estimate spill volume, the LACPW uses three methods most regularly: eyeball, measure volume, duration and flowrate. The District Staff preparing the estimate employ the method most appropriate to the sewer spill in question and use the best information available.
Table 4-1: Summary of Training Program
Training Type Description Recurrence
General Order
Requirements
Review of General Order Requirements
performed throughout the year in morning
briefings at each yard.
Monthly – One element
discussed each month.
Spill Emergency
Response and Drills and
Spill Volume Estimation
Staff are trained in the field during live spill
events. Staff being trained observe trained
crew members perform activities to learn
and then perform the activities under
supervision to check the training was
received.
Performed as-needed or at
least once annually.
CIWQS Reporting New Data Submitters are trained by
experienced in-house Data Submitters.
Staff also attend industry provided training
by CWEA and CASA and utilize training
videos from the State Water Board website.
Performed as-needed or at
least once annually.
4.5 Equipment Inventory
The maintenance crews are equipped with standard industry technologies including radio equipped trucks for easy communication, cellular phones, heavy and light construction equipment, vacuum trucks, pumps, generators, trucks equipped with closed-circuit television units for interior inspection of sewer lines, and various types of safety equipment.
Equipment is regularly checked, adjusted, repaired, or replaced as necessary. However, major fixed assets are replaced when they meet or exceed LACPW established fixed assets replacement criteria based on the age of the equipment, mileage, hours of use, repair history, etc.
Equipment categorized as Class 9 (less than 1/4 ton) or lower is automatically replaced by the Fleet Management Group when it meets the replacement criteria. The request to replace equipment higher than Class 9 is made as part of LACPW annual budget. In addition to the above replacement criteria, an analysis and recommendation by trained staff of LACPW and approval by LACPW’s administration is required to replace equipment higher than Class 9.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
Table 4-2: List of Major Equipment
Equipment Type Count
Inspection 22
Rodder 12
Vacuum 7
Compressor 2
Jetter 10
Pickup 25
Utility 4
Pump 6
Masonry 4
Dump 4
Construction 2
Sedan 1
Van/Passenger 2
Crane 2
2Axle 3
Stake 5
Tractor 2
TOTAL 113
These criteria, notwithstanding, a piece of equipment can also be replaced if its reliability or safety of operation becomes questionable. New and additional equipment are also acquired when fully justified based on increased workload, new activity, additional personnel, technological improvements, time and cost savings, employee or public safety requirements, etc. Each Collection System Yard maintains the spare equipment and parts needed by that yard to maintain the sewer pipelines and pump stations within the yard’s service area and each is responsible for ordering replacements.
—‘
-
-
-
-
—
gu
n
-
n
.
.
-
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
5 Design and Performance Provisions
5.1 Design and Construction Standards and Specifications The city requires that all sewers be designed in accordance with LACPW’s standards. The LACPW has standard plans and specifications for the construction of sanitary sewers and appurtenances to ensure that sewer lines and connections are properly designed and constructed. The LACPW specifications by reference incorporate the:
• Standard Plans for Public Works Construction;
• Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (“Green Book”); • Standard Plans Public Works 2000 Edition;
• Special Provisions; and
• Standard Drawings.
In addition, LACPW has other publications such as the Private Contract Sanitary Sewer Procedural Manual, Guidelines for the Design of Pump Stations, etc., to maintain consistency in the design of collection systems within the unincorporated County areas and CSMD member cities.
The city requires that these publications also be followed in the design of sewer systems within the city. To further ensure that sewer facilities are properly designed, the city requires construction drawings to be prepared by licensed engineers. The construction drawings are thoroughly reviewed by the City and SMDs engineers prior to approval for construction and inspection of the actual construction work. SMD review plans to ensure that appropriate maintenance standards are integrated into the design from a maintenance standpoint only.
5.2 Procedures and Standards for Inspecting and Testing System Improvements
To further assure that sewer facilities are properly designed and constructed, the LACPW requires that sanitary sewer plans are designed by licensed engineers and provides thorough review of plans prior to approval for and conducting inspection of construction work. Each city within CSMD has its own design and construction standards and requirements. Prior to accepting newly completed sewer system for maintenance, each city is responsible for assuring sewers are designed and constructed to standard. The following procedures are used to ensure compliance with LACPW standards for portions of the system designed and constructed in unincorporated areas:
The following procedures are used to ensure compliance with LACPW standards for portions of the system designed and constructed within the city:
• The city provides inspection by outsourcing to qualified consultants for the inspection of new sewer construction projects. The City requires that as-built plans of the completed projects be submitted prior to final approval for acceptance of sewer facilities for public use.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
• Within the City new sewers, as well as sewer lines rehabilitated by lining, be televised and the video reviewed by SMD’s personnel prior to the acceptance of the completed project.
• In compliance with LACPW’s policy, the City requires that all new or rehabilitated pumping stations be inspected by experienced SMD Electro-Mechanics prior to acceptance for maintenance by the SMD.
• LACPW’s inspectors are well trained in pipeline and pump station construction.
They attend training classes and educational seminars to stay familiar with advancements in the industry. The inspectors are also provided with adequate materials to perform their jobs, including the Standard Specification for Public Works Construction Inspection Manual, the Green Book, etc.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
6 Spill Emergency Response Plan
The LACPW’s Spill Emergency Response Plan (SERP), included in Appendix F provides guidelines for LACPW’s maintenance crew to follow in responding to, cleaning up, and reporting sewer spills that may occur within the Districts’ service area. The purpose of the SERP is to support an orderly and effective response to sewer spills that ensure all regulatory requirements are met. The LACPW’s SERP comprehensively addresses notification, response, assessment, and recordkeeping requirements of the SWCRB General Order as summarized in Table 6-1.
Table 6-1: Spill Emergency Response Plan General Order Compliance Order Requirement SERP Section
Notify primary responders, appropriate local officials, and appropriate regulatory agencies of a spill in a timely manner;
2, 3.4
Notify other potentially affected entities (for example, health agencies, water suppliers, etc.) of spills that potentially affect public health or reach waters of the State;
2, 3.4, 3.7
Comply with the notification, monitoring and reporting requirements of this General Order, State law and regulations, and applicable Regional Water Board Orders; 4 Ensure that appropriate staff and contractors implement the Spill Emergency Response Plan and are appropriately trained;
6 Address emergency system operations, traffic control and other necessary response activities;
3 Contain a spill and prevent/minimize discharge to waters of the State or any drainage conveyance system;
3.4 Minimize and remediate public health impacts and adverse impacts on beneficial uses of waters of the State;
3.4, 3.6
Remove sewage from the drainage conveyance system; 3.6 Clean the spill area and drainage conveyance system in a manner that does not inadvertently impact beneficial uses in the receiving waters;
3.6 Implement technologies, practices, equipment, and interagency coordination to expedite spill containment and recovery;
3.6 Implement pre-planned coordination and collaboration with storm drain agencies and other utility agencies/departments prior, during, and after a spill event; -
Conduct post-spill assessments of spill response activities; 3.8, 4.5 Document and report spill events as required in this General Order; and 4 Annually, review and assess effectiveness of the Spill Emergency Response Plan, and update the Plan as needed.
6.1 6.1.1 Pre-Planned Coordination with Other Agencies or Departments Member cities hold periodic meetings to review roles and responsibilities. For example, the role of the city is to support securing the site and initial containment before SMD field crews arrive. When appropriate, LACPW invites LACSD staff to discuss any jurisdictional inquiries or investigations of spills.
—I
I
C
I
I
I
g
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
7 Sewer Pipe Blockage Control Program
7.1 Program Overview
Analysis of sanitary sewer overflows over the last 3 years indicates an average of 88 percent of spills within the Districts collection system are linked to roots, debris, grease, pipe structural failure, and pump station failure either as a primary or secondary cause factor. Between 2021 and 2024, an average of 30 percent of spills were linked to grease accumulation and 18 percent linked to debris accumulation. To prevent the build-up of Fats, Oils and Grease (FOG) that can cause blockages and restrictions in flow, the County has implemented a FOG program to prevent sewage overflows into the environment, as well as to reduce the discharge of FOG to the sewer system.
Bellflower experienced 1 sewer overflow between 2001 through 2024, 1 spill caused by grease and rags.
To prevent the build-up of FOG that can cause blockages and restrictions in flow, LACPW has implemented a FOG program to prevent sewage overflows into the environment, as well as to reduce the discharge of FOG to the sewer system.
The Environmental Programs Division (EPD) is responsible for performing fats, oils, and grease source control inspections of food service establishments (FSEs). The EPD regulates industrial waste disposal for 36 cities by contract and all unincorporated areas.
The number of FSEs per city and within the unincorporated areas are listed in Table 7-1.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
Table 7-1: Number of FSEs per City/Area
City/Area
Number of Food Service
Establishments
Unincorporated Area 1025
Lakewood 181
Artesia 118
Cerritos 144
Paramount 52
Bellflower 51
La Mirada 74
Hawaiian Gardens 21
Carson 169
Culver City 188
Rolling Hills Estate 20
Lawndale 46
Cudahy 12
Lomita 58
Rosemead 114
Duarte 53
Irwindale 39
Temple City 55
Commerce 102
Bell Gardens 91
La Cañada Flintridge 49
Beverly Hills 135
San Fernando 52
Westlake Village 50
Agoura Hills 65
West Hollywood 255
Calabasas 53
San Dimas 80
Walnut 52
Diamond Bar 75
Santa Clarita 376
Total 1324
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
A list of cities that EPD supports with industrial waste disposal, including FOG source control inspections, can also be found on the Los Angeles County official website:
• https://cleanla.lacounty.gov/industrial-waste/#Jurisdictions For the other Cities that are not on this list, the City handles all their own FOG-related source control activities.
The EPD’s FOG program guidelines and procedures can be found on the Industrial Waste page on the LACPW’s website:
• https://cleanla.lacounty.gov/industrial-waste/#Obtaining-Clearance The website provides FOG guidelines, standard drawings for grease pretreatment devices, permit forms, and details on EPD’s FOG program.
7.2 Implementation Plan and Schedule for Public Outreach
7.2.1 Summary of Outreach Activities
The LACPW conducts public outreach through various channels to educate the community about Fats, Oils, and Grease management:
• Community Events: LACPW participates in resource fairs, park events, and Earth Day- themed events, where staff distribute FOG brochures and answer questions from the community.
• Website Resources: The FOG page on LACPW’s website provides a comprehensive list of FOG do’s and don’ts:
https://pw.lacounty.gov/SMD/grease/Index.cfm
• Inspections: During inspections of FSEs, FOG inspectors provide educational materials on best management practices (BMPs) for grease traps and interceptors.
Newly permitted FSEs also receive BMP materials.
By engaging with the community and FSEs through these activities, LACPW aims to promote effective FOG management practices and prevent blockages in the sewer system.
To complement LACPW efforts, the City will initiate its own Public Education Outreach Program. This will consist of including SSO- and FOG-related articles from the LACPW and other sources, such as the City's newsletters and webpage ( https://bellflower.ca.gov) , and by maintaining continuous communication with the LACPW, City residents, and other stakeholders on these and other issues. City personnel also disseminate information to residents during meetings or while conducting right-of-way lateral work inspections.
7.2.2 Plan and Schedule of Events
The schedule of outreach activities is based on opportunities for public engagement and the frequency of FSE inspections. When an opportunity arises for SMD to participate in a public event, the Community and Government Relations Group (CGRG) notifies them.
Many of these events occur annually and SMD tries to be involved if notified by the CGRG
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
in time to coordinate. CGRG keeps track of all the events the LACPW participates in annually, providing a summary of events at the end of the year.
FSE Outreach is timed around FSE inspections. FSE owners are provided with educational material when FOG inspectors visit to inspect grease traps and interceptors and check for any violations.
7.3 Plan and Schedule for Disposal of FOG
For the disposal of grease and other pipe-blocking substances, FSE’s must obtain an Industrial Waste Disposal Permit from EPD that requires a schedule of frequent maintenance and documentation of maintenance and disposal of waste. Under the permit, grease traps are required to be maintained/pumped daily while grease traps/interceptors that can handle 750 gallons or greater require quarterly maintenance. FOG haulers have multiple options for grease disposal, including Baker Commodity in Vernon and designated disposal locations in Los Angeles and the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County. These disposal sites are regulated and require a fee.
The solidified fats found in the City and LACPW collection system during cleaning operations are trapped, collected, and taken to the maintenance yard dump bins. Once the bins are full, these and other debris collected from the system are taken to the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County facilities.
7.4 Authority to Prohibit FOG Discharges and Identify
Measures to Prevent FOG Spills
7.4.1 Authority
The city and LACPW legal authority to prevent illicit discharges into the sanitary sewer system and to limit the discharge of FOG and other debris that may cause blockages in the sewer lines is discussed in Chapter 3.
7.4.2 Preventative Measures
The LACPW utilize semiannual manhole inspection of all manholes and the scheduled and unscheduled sewer line cleaning and television inspection of the interior of sewer pipes to identify pipe segments experiencing heavy grease accumulation and in mitigating the problem. These legal mandates and maintenance practices are complemented by the LACPW’s Public Education and Outreach Program discussed in Section 7.1 to minimize spills and blockages caused by FOG.
7.5 FOG Program Requirements and Design Standards
A pretreatment system/device is required for any new and existing food service establishment or similar facility where FOG from food preparation is discharged into the sewer system in quantities that may cause blockages or interfere with sewage treatment or disposal. All pretreatment facilities, whether required by EPD or installed voluntarily, shall be maintained and operated under a valid Industrial Waste Disposal Permit (IWDP) for the operating life of the facility.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
FOG program requirements are outlined in the IDWP Conditions and Limitations (Appendix G1) and are supported by the Pretreatment Guidelines for Restaurants and Food Service Operations.
7.5.1 Requirements to Install Grease Removal Devices
The LACPW’s legal authorities to enforce the requirements stipulated in this section are discussed in Chapter 3. The Director of Public Works has enforcement authority for industrial waste permitting per Section 20.36.040 of the LACO Code and charged the EPD with permitting and inspecting more than 1,300 food service establishments that discharge into the sanitary sewer system in the unincorporated areas and 36 contract cities within the CSMD. New or remodeled FSEs and those under new ownership must also secure a permit from the Building and Safety Division (BSD). If there is a FOG- related problem associated with an industrial waste permit, DPW will take enforcement action against the permittee, or where applicable, refer the problem to the contract city for enforcement action. The EPD requires that industrial waste generating facilities and any FSE with the potential to produce grease install a grease control device (GRD).
The LACPW does not issue permits or inspect domestic sewage disposal to the sanitary sewer system. However, the LACO Code prohibits the discharge of “any material, which may create a public nuisance, or menace to the public health or safety, or which may pollute underground or surface waters, or which may cause damage to any storm drain channel or public or private property” (Section 20.36.010). If during inspection of the sanitary sewer system LACPW’s personnel determines that a FOG-related problem exists and is traceable to a domestic sewage source of such character that is not satisfactory, under the LACO Code (section 20.20.100), pretreatment could be required or the discharge required to be eliminated. Domestic waste containing FOG can lead to spills, which are public nuisances and is a violation of California Health and Safety Code Division 5, Part 3, Chapter 6, Article 2, which can also be used to impose appropriate domestic sewage discharge requirements.
7.5.2 Design Standards for Grease Removal Devices
FSEs are required to size, design and construct grease traps and interceptors according to the LACO Plumbing Code. Additionally, they are required to be approved, installed, and operated in a manner to control discharges of FOG into the sanitary sewer system and to ensure that the facilities do not create nuisances, menaces to the public peace, health or safety hazards, or adverse impacts to the public sewer system, soil, underground, and/or surface waters.
The Industrial Waste online page on the County’s website provides standard drawings for grease pretreatment devices: https://cleanla.lacounty.gov/industrial-waste/#Obtaining- Clearance
7.5.3 Maintenance Requirements
The IWDP Conditions and Limitations has a minimum maintenance frequency condition and a requirement to maintain the GRD in proper working order. During inspections, inspectors physically examine the GRD. If a grease interceptor (GI) is used, FSEs are required to open and inspect it. If issues are identified, they are documented, and a job
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
order is created. The FSE signs off on the order and receives a receipt. If cleaning records are not provided, or if the GI cannot be accessed, the FSE must clean it.
Permit conditions require:
• GIs to be cleaned at least once every three months
• FSEs with grease traps are required to perform daily maintenance
7.5.4 Best Management Practices Requirements
7.5.5 The Pretreatment Guidelines for Restaurants and Food Service Operations provide guidelines and best management practices for selecting and installing pretreatment devices. These guidelines outline the installation requirements for grease interceptors and offer a list of alternative pretreatment devices that can be used in lieu of a grease interceptor.
During inspections, inspectors verify whether best management practices are being followed, such as maintaining proper documentation, using adequate devices, and employing appropriate disposal methods. In incorporated areas, inspectors distribute flyers outlining the dos and don’ts of fog management and request that these flyers be displayed at workstations for workers to see.
7.5.6 Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements
As a condition of the Industrial Waste Permit, FSEs must record the maintenance of grease trap/interceptors on a maintenance log report. The log records date of the service performed, types of services performed, and person/company providing service.
Additionally, for any liquid or solid industrial wastes transported from the site, FSEs must obtain and keep copies of receipts for grease trap/interceptor maintenance and pumping for at least 180 days.
The maintenance log report and receipts shall be made available to LACPW and the City (if applicable) upon request.
7.5.7 Procedures
The LACPW implements the following procedure to identify and manage sections of the system impacted by FOG blockages:
• Identification: Sections impacted by FOG blockages are identified through regular inspections conducted by cleaning crews, CCTV inspections, and reports of spills.
• Investigation: Once identified, these sections are thoroughly investigated to assess the extent of the blockages and determine the appropriate actions needed to address them.
• Maintenance: Based on the investigation findings, a periodic cleaning schedule is defined and implemented for each affected section to ensure ongoing maintenance and prevent future blockages.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
7.6 Inspection and Enforcement Program
7.6.1 Authority to Inspect Grease Producing Facilities
As discussed in Chapter 3 of this document, Section 20.36.400 of the LACO Code provides legal authority to inspect FOG-producing facilities, prohibiting the discharge of substances that may obstruct or require frequent maintenance of the sewer system.
The source control inspection process follows standard workflow, including researching plans, preparing for the inspection, reviewing operations, and requesting GRD maintenance documentation. Inspectors may ask questions about waste oil management, changes in operations that affect the permit, and maintenance frequency. They also check for compliance with Best Management Practices such as ensuring BMP posters are visible in the kitchen. Inspectors document their findings and enter data into the HMS database.
When SMD encounters FOG issues in the collection system, whether from spills CCTV inspections, or sewer cleaning, the source of the problem is evaluated as either residential, commercial, or both. For residential spills, SMD may notify residents door-to-door, providing information on proper grease disposal practices. For recurring issues, the affected area is placed on a preventive maintenance schedule.
In the case of commercial spills, the incident is referred to EPD for investigation. EPD checks GRD maintenance and requires corrective actions when needed. If an FSE without a GRD is responsible for a spill, EPD mandates the installation of a GRD. If a GRD-equipped FSE causes a spill, more frequent maintenance may be required. All investigations are documented in the HMS database, and results are communicated to SMD as relevant.
7.6.2 Authority to Enforce
The enforcement process for violations varies based on location. In unincorporated areas, inspectors issue a Notice of Violation or Order to Comply with a set deadline. Follow-up inspections verify compliance, and unresolved issues may be escalated to supervisors. In rare instances, compliance issues are referred to headquarters, possibly resulting in legal action with the District Attorney. In CSMD cities, violations are handled similarly, but escalation may involve the City’s Code Enforcement and, if necessary, the City Attorney.
7.6.3 Resource Plan to Inspect and Enforce
The EPD has sufficient inspection and enforcement staffing to achieve an annual FSE inspection cycle and follow up on requirements and violations identified. LACPW’s current funding allows for increases in permit and other services charges if necessary to hire additional staff.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
7.7 Maintenance Program to Address FOG Issues
As described in Section 4, FOG prone sections of LACPW’s collection system, referred to as “hot spots,” are identified during routine maintenance operations and investigation of stoppages and spills. These portions of the system found to have persistent FOG problems are put on monthly, quarterly, or semi-annual periodic cleaning schedule, depending on the magnitude of the problem. Furthermore, segments of the collection system with persistent FOG problems are referred to the EPD for additional investigation and enforcement actions.
7.8 Implementation of Source Control Measures to Address FOG Issues
7.8.1 Summary of Source Control Measures
Pretreatment devices are used to remove grease from sewage to prevent the accumulation of FOG that can lead to blockages. The LACPW provides pretreatment guidelines to FSEs, offering guidance on how to adequately select, size, and install a pretreatment device based on the amount of grease produced. The maintenance of these devices is outlined in the IWDP to ensure proper operation and functionality. Under the IWDP, LACPW or City may require upgrades to grease interceptors if maintenance is inadequate or if the interceptor is too small to handle the waste stream.
7.8.2 Summary of Source Control Program Enforcement
The EPD conducts routine inspections of FSEs and inspects new establishments.
Investigations are also performed when spills occur. When SMD receives complaints and determines that FOG may have caused a spill or has the potential to cause a spill (e.g., grease accumulation), they reach out to the EPD for further investigation. Upon investigation, the EPD may make adjustments to the permit and treatment requirements to prevent such incidents and/or place the impacted area under periodic maintenance as described in Section 4.2.7. Under the Industrial Waste Discharge Permit (IWDP), LACPW or City may modify the permit and its conditions and limitations as necessary to ensure proper waste disposal.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
8 System Evaluation, Capacity Assurance and
Capital Improvements
The LACPW has implemented procedures for system evaluation, capacity assurance, investment prioritization, and capital improvement planning. This section documents the procedures and activities for:
• Routine evaluation and assessment of system conditions; • Capacity assessment and design criteria;
• Prioritization of corrective actions; and
• Capital improvement planning.
8.1 System Evaluation and Condition Assessment
8.1.1 Best Practices and New Technology
LACPW uses CCTV as the primary tool for condition assessment of pipelines which is in accordance with industry standards for small diameter pipelines. Use of CCTV is the industry best practice for sewer pipeline condition assessment given the pipe size range (8-inch to 36-inch) the County owns and operates.
8.1.2 Amount of System Condition Assessment
Under the Condition Assessment Program (CAP), SMD plans to perform CCTV inspections at a rate of approximately 500 miles of sewer infrastructure each year starting in 2025. The complete cycle is scheduled to last a total of approximately 10 years, with the period between inspections dependent upon age and results from the last inspection.
Newer pipe segments found to be in good condition in the prior inspection will have a low priority in the next inspection cycle. SMD inspects all manholes twice a year.
8.1.3 Inspection and Condition Assessment Prioritization Historically, LACPW’s CAP prioritized condition assessment projects based on jurisdiction/cities with ordering based on spill rate. The assessment prioritized sewer lines with the most potential for repair needs based on maintenance history, past overflow records, sewer line locations, and age. Based on the reissued General Order LACPW will incorporate additional factors into condition assessment prioritization. These include areas that:
• Hold a high level of environmental consequences if vulnerable to collapse, failure, blockage, capacity issues, or other system deficiencies; • Are located in or within the vicinity of surface waters, steep terrain, high groundwater elevations, and environmentally sensitive areas; • Are within the vicinity of receiving water with a bacterial-related impairment on the most current Clean Water Act section 303(d) List;
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
The LACPW plans to develop and implement an approach to incorporate these factors into condition assessment prioritization by May 2027.
8.1.4 Inspection Methods
The LACPW uses CCTV inspection as the primary means for collecting visual observations of system conditions. This CCTV inspection program digitally records the condition of the pipe interior from manhole to manhole using a robotic camera tethered to a camera van.
While the video is being captured, a National Association of Sewer Service Companies (NASSCO) Pipeline Assessment and Certification Program (PACP) certified crew member views and logs events such as defects and observations using the standardized NASSCO PACP observation codes. With GraniteNet, the digital video inspections files are transferred via cloud enabling access to anyone with credentials and password access using a laptop or mobile device.
In addition to CCTV inspection, visual inspection is conducted on sewer facilities during sewer system maintenance activities. In the past, a field crew would document visual observations and system issues on a form to trigger follow up inspections and repair actions. With the implementation of Cityworks, field crews now provide these observations electronically using mobile devices for immediate communication to SMD superintendents and supervisors to trigger follow-on actions to address issues.
8.1.5 Utilizing Observations for Condition Assessment
The LACPW utilizes the NASSCO rating system to identify defects and observations using PACP observation codes. The City plans to continue using the NASSCO PACP condition rating for sewer pipelines and is planning to incorporate the MACP for manhole condition assessments. The LACPW prioritizes repairs of critical structural defects. These include NASSCO PACP Structural Grade 5 defects with potential for soil migration and undermining of pipe bedding leading to pipe movement and having potential for accelerated deterioration (i.e., pipe collapse, broken void visible, broken soil visible, hole void visible, hole soil visible, missing wall, and severe offsets impeding flow). These types of defects also have potential for leakage. Other less severe NASSCO PACP Structural Grade 5 and NASSCO PACP Structural Grade 4 defects are not prone to leakage due to collimation and sealing of the defects with sedimentation and biological growth.
Throughout Los Angeles County, historical rivers and creeks have been concrete-lined or replaced with storm drainage piping. The LACPW is not aware of any locations in the CSMD service area where there is potential for subsurface leakage reaching a water of the State.
The LACPW also performs visual inspections weekly at pump stations to verify the pumps are performing well, are properly maintained, and are in compliance with standards. If issues are identified, they are addressed via a corrective maintenance work order or elevated to be included in a project.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
8.1.6 Inspection and Assessment Recordkeeping
The LACPW documents and recordkeeping of system evaluation and condition assessment inspections and activities have historically been maintained using WinCan software with videos stored on LACPW servers. LACPW recently transitioned to using GraniteNet, a cloud-based CCTV software, which will enable access to CCTV data and videos to anyone with password access and credentials from mobile devices or laptops connected to the internet.
In the past, when field crews conduct visual inspections during maintenance activities, system deficiencies requiring action were recorded as footnotes on forms for replacements, repairs, and issue identification. Once the Cityworks is implemented, field crews can use mobile devices to document these issues in the Cityworks Maintenance Management System to better manage and keep record of findings and address issues.
Assessing Assets Vulnerable to Climate Change
The District’s service area has sections of the system that are susceptible to climate change impacts from flooding, landslides, wildfires, and power disruptions that may cause service disruptions. LACPW plans to develop and implement procedures to identify and address system assets vulnerable to direct and indirect impacts of climate change by November 2027, including but not limited to:
• Sea level rise
• Flooding and/or erosion due to increased storm volumes, frequency, and/or intensity
• Wildfires
• Increased power disruptions
LACPW has an overarching Emergency Response Plan for addressing large-scale emergency events. These procedures provide comprehensive guidelines for personnel to effectively respond to various emergency situations including communication directives, preparatory assignments, and specific actions for different types of emergencies.
Specific Emergency Procedures related to climate change include:
• Earthquake Response Procedures
• Fire Response Procedures
• Storm Response Procedures
• Electrical Power and Telecommunication Outage
• Tsunami (Large Wave) and High Tide Procedures
• Sewage Leakage and Overflows
• Air Pollution Emergency Response Procedures
• Land Movement and Rockslide Response
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
8.2 Capacity Assessment and Design Criteria
8.2.1 Gravity Facilities
The City is responsible for confirming that newly constructed pipelines are constructed with adequate hydraulic capacity. A study is required for each development to analyze the capacity of the existing system and will set forth mitigation requirements for developers to ensure adequate capacity sizing of proposed sewer lines to accommodate the current design and future base, peak, and wet weather flows.
CSMD member cities are responsible for capacity assurance within their jurisdictional boundaries.
A preliminary assessment determines whether a sewer area study is required, based on zoning and acreage to estimate the load. If the estimated load exceeds thresholds, a sewer area study is triggered. Sewer load calculations are lot-based, determined using parcel size and zoning type. A standard measure, such as cubic feet per second (cfs) per acre, is used, with flow rates varying by zoning type. This methodology results in sewer lines are designed to handle the specific load for each parcel. Increased densification due to new zoning or development to full capacity may necessitate resizing existing sewer pipes.
For all new projects impacting the capacity of the public sewer system, the LACPW requires the submission of a sewer area study. The capacity assessment assumes an ideal system with no illegal connections and uses a design criterion of 1/2-full pipe capacity as adequate for lines smaller than 15-inch in diameter, and 3/4-full pipe for lines 15-inch and greater. Reports are submitted and reviewed through a plan check process.
The sewer area study procedure and support materials for the unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County can be found on the Land Development Division website:
• https://pw.lacounty.gov/ldd/lddservices/sewerAreaStudy/sewerAreaStudy.shtml The City is responsible for ensuring that the public sewer infrastructure is correctly designed, adequately sized, and easily maintained. LACPW provides a supporting role in reviewing all proposed sewer plans for new developments in the City to ensure that they conform to LACPW’s design standards and to ensure that requirements for acceptability for maintenance are met.
The Director of Public Works/City Engineer or hired qualified private company provides thorough review of all sewer plans for proposed development projects in the City to ensure that (1) they are properly designed with sufficient capacity for current and future base, peak, and wet-weather flow demands; and (2) any impact of proposed project on existing sewer system is mitigated prior to being approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. During construction, the projects are continuously inspected by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer or hired construction inspectors to ensure that sewer facilities are constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications.
8.2.2 Pressure Facilities
Pump stations within the City and LACPW are designed for full buildout and include redundancy in controls and pumping systems. If developers seek to connect additional
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
tracts, they must hire an engineer to evaluate the pump station’s capacity needs. Flow studies are conducted on a case-by-case basis through the permitting process. Sewer line flow measurements are performed to assess the capacity of lines suspected of being surcharged. These measurements are straightforward for established sewer systems, though more remote systems require additional permissions for access.
8.2.3 Infiltration and Inflow
The assessment of increased infiltration and inflow (I/I) is conducted in collaboration with LACSD. LACSD performs studies to identify sources of I/I into their system, which may include LACPW’s collection systems, potentially triggering an assessment of LACPW’s system. Mitigation strategies include sealing manholes and sewer lining, LACPW with LACSD providing the sealant and lining materials. Additionally, LACSD and LACPW develop a list of manholes affected by I/I. LACSD typically requests that manholes be sealed, and peepholes corked. Sampling and analysis are performed as needed.
8.2.4 Erosive Forces in Canyons and Streams
The LACPW mitigates erosive forces for pipelines crossing or near rivers and streams by requiring these pipelines to be concrete encased. The methods of encasement are defined in LACPW’s Design Standards Manual.
8.2.5 Design Flow and Weather Events
The system is designed according to LACPW’s Design Standards to accommodate dry weather peak flow conditions and design storm and wet weather events. Approximately 91 percent of pipelines in CSMD system are 8-inch vitrified clay pipes and approximately 8 percent are 10-inch to 15-inch diameter. The City has approximately 95 percent of pipes that are 8-inch vitrified clay pipes and approximately 5 percent are 9-inch to 18-inch diameter. These pipelines collect flows from small sewer catchment areas and convey the flows to the nearest LACSD trunk sewers for conveyance to an LACSD treatment plant for treatment and disposal.
8.2.6 Capacity Assessment Data
When performing sewer capacity studies within the City’s boundary, developers can obtain reference data for the development of sewer studies and capacity assessments directly from the City. LACPW’s Land Development Division (LDD) can assist upon request from the City.
When performing sewer capacity studies within the unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County, developers can obtain reference data for the development of sewer studies and capacity assessments on LDD’s website. The website provides guidance on the approval process, links to information such as as-builts and sewer locators, and examples of required documents. If contractors need additional information, they may reach out to LDD directly to request any additional materials.
The LDD collects, maintains, and archives all sewer studies and flow data performed, and can provide this information upon request. Additionally, LDD has access to and can provide information as needed from sewer pipeline condition assessments, system
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
inspections, spill history, and other available data used to assess system deficiencies and identify necessary system repairs and rehabilitation.
There are no pump stations located within City name.
8.2.7 Capacity Enhancement Plan
The Sewer Collection System Capacity Enhancement Program is a combined effort between the City and LACPW. LACPW’s Capacity Enhancement Plan focuses on managing infiltration and inflow (I/I) by requiring proper system design through plan checks, careful inspection during construction, and the use of appropriate pipe materials.
After installation, multiple strategies are employed to identify and eliminate I/I sources where feasible. Detection strategies include visual inspections, CCTV, and smoke and dye testing.
• If the sources are due to illicit connections such as sump pumps, roof drainage, surface water diversion into a manhole, etc., applicable laws are enforced to eliminate them.
• Significant structural issues like collapses, breaks, holes, or severe offsets are corrected through repair, replacement, or lining.
• Maintenance issues such as grease accumulation and debris are addressed through regular sewer line cleaning, and flow measurements are used to assess the capacity of sewer lines suspected of surcharging.
8.3 Prioritization of Corrective Actions
LACPW prioritizes corrective action based on:
• Likelihood of failure which is determined from findings of condition assessment (e.g., prioritizing NASSCO PACP rating, 4 and 5) and;
• Consequence of failure (e.g., proximity to water body, railroad, road type, and easement)
• Areas with multiple priority segments to factor in areas to be repaired at a time Based on the condition grading and observed defects, LACPW prioritizes sewer segments for remediation. NASSCO PACP Structural Grade 5 defects are significant structural deficiencies. Pipe segments with these defects are placed on a repair list with the highest priority focused on pipes with NASSCO PACP Structural Grade 5 defects prone to accelerated deterioration. Sewer repairs are also prioritized based on maintenance history, past overflow records, sewer line locations, and age as they contribute to the likelihood and severity of spills.
8.4 Capital Improvement Plan
Responsibility for capital improvements varies based on the type of improvement required.
For new sewer installations, collection systems owned by the cities receive funding from the City. New connections and capacity-related improvements in unincorporated areas are funded and constructed by the developers, including construction contracting (refer to
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
Section 8.2). The County provides oversight throughout the design and construction of the capacity related improvements, including review and acceptance during permitting, design reviews, and construction. The Design Division is responsible for developing the design criteria for CIP projects, and PMD III manages the development, design and construction. The LDD manages the County Improvement Projects in unincorporated areas, including tracking budget, scope, and schedule.
The City manages their own CIP schedule, tracking budget, scope, design, and construction of new connections and capacity-related improvements within their boundary.
For rehabilitation and repair, the Districts manage and funds projects for both City systems and unincorporated areas. The Districts focuses on lining and emergency point repairs for damaged pipes to maintain operations and reduce the risk of sewer spills.
Most repairs are delivered through on-call contracts, including work on gravity mains, force mains, pump stations, and treatment plants. The Accumulative Capital Outlay Program (ACO) and special zones fund the repair and maintenance of SMD facilities.
8.4.1 Accumulative Capital Outlay Program
The Accumulative Capital Outlay (ACO) Program fund was established in 1987 as a mechanism to pay for sewer pipe replacements, relief sewer construction, and maintenance improvements to sewage pumping stations. The objectives of the fund are to establish a charge to be collected from each parcel of real property in the CSMD and utilize these monies for sewer line repair and rehabilitation projects (emergency or scheduled).
Additionally, some deteriorated lines are discovered during preventive maintenance of our sewer lines. These lines are either immediately repaired by force account, using emergency contractors, or added to the list of future ACO projects. Table 8-1 lists the contracts under the ACO program as of May 5, 2025.
All sewer pipe segments within the District’s service areas found to have significant structural deficiencies will continue to be repaired or rehabilitated under the ACO program.
Table 8-1: ACO Program Contract List
Projects Name Amount Start Date End Date
Fountain Springs Pump Station 1,214,199 Sept, 2026 Sept, 2028 San Dimas Pump Station 1,214,199 January, 2026 April, 2027 On-Call As-Needed Contract 62,202,057 Est. July 2025 Est. July 2030
8.4.2 Joint Coordination and Interagency Coordination
The majority of collection system improvements are managed by Sewer Maintenance Division staff using resources from on-call contracts for planning, design, and construction.
In some cases, projects are managed by PMD III. In either case, coordination between L—___)
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
operation and maintenance staff, County engineering staff, consultants and contractors occurs throughout the planning, design and construction phases of project delivery.
Project delivery incorporates coordination meetings and milestone deliverable reviews by all stakeholders.
Early in the project delivery process, impacted agencies and entities are identified to initiate communication and permitting to streamline project delivery. This includes communication and coordination with CSMD Cities if the work is being performed on their collection system. Another primary impacted agency is LACSD, since there are numerous connections between LACPW’s collection systems and LACSD trunk sewers. LACPW also coordinates with the City of Los Angeles and Las Virgenes when necessary, when working in areas where their systems connect to LACPW’s systems. Other impacted entities can include Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Fish and Wildlife, railroads, schools, neighboring cities, or CSMD member cities. Collaboration helps align project planning, and resource allocation for engineering, design, and construction. Regular communication, data sharing, and joint meetings support the coordination of timelines, permitting, and infrastructure improvements while reducing conflicts across jurisdictions.
All coordination of stakeholders and community engagement is managed by LDD staff. 9 Monitoring, Measurement and Program
Modifications
9.1 Maintenance of Information to Prioritize SSMP Activities Relevant information for prioritization of SSMP activities is collected in an array of information systems, databases, and spreadsheets.
• WinCan and GraniteNet are used to video and log events from CCTV inspection.
WinCan is the legacy repository. LACPW recently implemented GraniteNet and will be using GraniteNet for all future inspections.
• Historically, LACPW documented maintenance activities in the field using paper forms and work orders and later entered into Maximo. LACPW is transitioning from Maximo to Cityworks for management of maintenance activities. The implementation of Cityworks will streamline data collection and improve asset management efficiency.
• FOG inspection activities are recorded on paper and stored in the HMS database. • Spill data is stored in the State Water Resources Control Board’s CIWQS database and SMD internal PowerBI database. Productivity reports documenting and summarizing the work performed per City can be generated by PowerBI. • Previous audits findings are documented in an Audit Progress Tracker updated by SMD staff.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
Table 9-1: Information Systems Relevant to SSMP Implementation and Monitoring System Description of Primary Functions Related SSMP Activities Maximo Maintenance management system
for managing maintenance
activities. Field crew activities are
recorded in various forms and
stored in the MMS. LACPW is
transitioning to Cityworks
• Managing and recording work
orders and maintenance activities
Cityworks Maintenance management system
to schedule and track maintenance,
condition assessment and FOG
activities
• Used to plan, schedule, and track
work orders and activities for
maintenance
• Recording CCTV videos and
condition assessment findings
• Managing FOG source control
inspections
GIS Database Asset database of record, including
asset attribute information such as
material type, diameter. Represents
asset physical location spatially
• Creating and maintaining maps of
sewer features and related
infrastructure
CADD Database Database of as-built plans of the
city’s facilities
• Storing and managing as-built
plans and system data
Productivity Report (Power BI) Maintains record of all spills that occur in the system. Display spill
trends and analysis
• Generating spill analysis reports
and figures
• Analyzing and displaying spill
trends
• Documenting and summarizing the
work performed per City
CCTV Log (database) Videos and log CCTV events,
serving as the repository for
historical CCTV inspection data
• Recording and maintaining CCTV
inspection data
Community Profiles (Power BI) city profiles with detailed information on population, manholes, pipes,
pump stations, and properties
• Records detailed city profiles that
summarizes the infrastructure
within each city
• Generating service area overview
and breakdown
Supervisory Control and Data
Acquisition (SCADA) system
Tracks pumping plants operating,
alarm, and instrumentation data
• Monitoring real-time performance of
pumping plants to trigger
maintenance action
• Collecting and storing pump station
data
HMS Database Maintain records of all sites and
locations under the FOG program.
Tracks permits, inspection,
investigations, and records source
control data
• Documenting past inspections and
investigations
• Records permits, and investigation
and inspection findings
• Creates notices for FSEs and
inspections schedules
Microsoft Office Used to manage various collection
system programs as an electronic
database. Currently stores the
schedule for FOG program
activities, transitioning to Cityworks.
• Managing schedules and data for
FOG program activities
Audit Progress Tracker Spreadsheet listing past audit
findings used to document
corrective actions, task leads,
deadlines, and progress.
• Document audit findings and
corrective actions
• Tracking implementation to address
audit findings
_1
-.
:
IE
_
i _n
u
.
.
-
.
.
.
.
.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
9.2 Monitoring of Implementation and Effectiveness of the SSMP
The City and LACPW monitor the implementation and effectiveness of the SSMP through coordination of SMD staff and collection supervisors. The effectiveness of the program is primarily monitored and tracked by overall sewer overflow performance such as amount of sewer spills, spill response time, and reduction of repeated spills.
Monthly meetings between SMD Superintendents and Supervisors focus on discussing safety procedures, operational and personnel issues, and the status of spills. Additionally, productivity reports on Power BI are reviewed to track progress in meeting inspection and maintenance targets, which are set and monitored by the superintendents.
Collection supervisors meet bi-weekly to go over status and tracking of maintenance activities. These meetings serve as a forum to facilitate communication between SMD Management and SMD Superintendents and Supervisors.
9.3 Program Audits
Every three years, LACPW performs an internal audit of the SSMP and the SSMP program implementation. Every three years, the City will perform their own internal audit of the SSMP and the SSMP program implementation. The various LACPW and City’s divisions and positions responsible for SSMP implementation, as identified in Table 2-2a and 2-2b, are involved in the audit. Each element of the SSMP is reviewed for effectiveness towards reducing the frequency and/or mitigating the impacts of spills and for compliance with the General Order requirements. Corrective actions to address identified deficiencies are prioritized, scheduled and incorporated into division plans.
9.4 Assessment of Preventative Maintenance Program
LACPW assesses the success of its Preventative Maintenance Programs by monitoring spill trends and spill events to identify improvements in their operation. By keeping track of sewer blockages and overflow, LACPW can respond with the appropriate corrective measure and program adjustments.
9.5 Identification and Illustration of Spill trends
Data acquisition, analysis, and management of sewer spills is supported by a dynamic information management system. Spill data is visualized in SMD’s PowerBI database which allows for the identification and tracking of spill trends. PowerBI can generate spill analysis reports and figures, illustrating these trends and providing the metrics needed to identify spill trends and evaluate the overall success of the SSMP program.
This system enables LACPW to review spill performance based on frequency (seasonal variations, year-over-year comparisons), location (known problem areas, system characteristics such as pipe material and installation timeline), and volume (totals reaching surface waters, average volumes, and changes over time, which can indicate the effectiveness of response times).
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
9.6 Approach to Program Modifications and Plan Updates
The City and LACPW update the SSMP every six years. The update consists of:
• Reviewing the existing SSMP language and updating any outdated information.
This includes updates to staff positions, names and organizational lines of authority that have changed, changes to system characteristics such as basin areas, etc. • Incorporation of the adopted and implemented recommendations from previous SSMP program audits.
Upon completion of the six-year SSMP update, the SSMP is provided to the Board of Supervisors by LACPW and to the City Council by City with a request for approval. Upon acceptance by the Board for LACPW SSMP update and City Council for the City’s SSMP update, the SSMP is uploaded to the State Water Board CIWQS database and certified.
SMD also posts the SSMP on the LACPW webpage and City also posts their SSMP on City’s webpage.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
10 SSMP Program Audits
LACPW and City audits the SSMP and program implementation to identify actions for improving how it manages, operates, and maintains the collection system. This process identifies the tasks and actions that are required to meet SSMP goals and defines and prioritizes them. Cities are responsible for either performing their own SSMP development and audits on their collection systems or requesting support from CSMD to complete their audit through a City Service Request.
10.1 Schedule of Program Audits and Updates
LACPW and City perform an internal audit of its SSMP every three years in accordance with General Order requirements. Every six years, LACPW and City update and recertify the SSMP. Table 10-1 shows the anticipated schedule for SSMP audits and updates for the next six years.
While the various unincorporated areas have different audit and update cycles, LACPW completes one SSMP audit report covering all collection systems in unincorporated County areas according to the Group 1 schedule. The audit and SSMP update prepared for Group 1 is utilized for all other collection systems in unincorporated County areas.
LACPW provide operation and maintenance services for the City’s sewer facilities; therefore, some components of the City’s audit and SSMP may be similar to LACPW’s audit and SSMP update prepared in Group 1.
Table 10-1: SSMP Audit and Update Schedule
Collection System Group Audit Due Audit Due Update Due
Unincorporated County Area CSMD South/County
Sanitation District CS
1 11/2/2027 11/2/2030 5/2/2031
Unincorporated County Area CSMD-NW/County
Sanitation District CS
2 2/2/2028 2/2/2031 8/2/2031
Malibu Mesa Zone of the CSMD CS 3 11/2/2028 11/2/2031 5/2/2032 Unincorporated County Area CSMD North/County
Sanitation District CS
3 11/2/2028 11/2/2031 5/2/2032
Unincorporated County Area CSMD/Las Virgenes
Tapia CS
3 11/2/2028 11/2/2031 5/2/2032
Unincorporated County Area Marina/Aneta Zone of
the CSMD/City Hyperion CS
3 11/2/2028 11/2/2031 5/2/2032
Trancas Zone of the CSMD CS 3 11/2/2028 11/2/2031 5/2/2032 Unincorporated County Area Lake Hughes Zone of
the CSMD CS
4 2/2/2029 2/2/2032 8/2/2032
Unincorporated County Area CSMD South/County
Sanitation District CS
4 2/2/2029 2/2/2032 8/2/2032
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
Collection System Group Audit Due Audit Due Update Due
BELLFLOWER, 4SSO10369 2 2/2/2028 2/2/2031 8/2/2031
10.2 SSMP Audit Process
The City’s Director of Public Works and SMD Division Manager assemble division staff and field crew personnel to perform an internal audit in accordance with the General Order requirements for Sewer System Management Plan Audits. Over the course of approximately three months, the audit team, including representatives from the divisions responsible for each SSMP section, conducts a series of in-person meetings to evaluate the effectiveness of each SSMP Part and Sub-part, identify any deficiencies, and make recommendations for improvements and updates. This process involves reviewing the program documentation in the Sewer System Management Plan, assessing current procedures and practices employed by staff, and discussing potential program modifications to enhance program effectiveness.
10.3 SSMP Audit Report
The findings from the SSMP audit are documented in an audit report. The audit report includes the following elements:
• Audit findings and recommended corrective actions;
• A statement that sewer system operators’ input on the audit findings has been considered; and
• A proposed schedule to address identified deficiencies Once the audit report is complete, a quality check review of the audit report is performed, with a focus on consistency and completeness. The final audit report is reviewed by the CSMD and City’s LRO before final acceptance. Audit reports and related materials are maintained in a hard copy and an electronic document tracking and management system.
Copies of the SSMP will be maintained in the SMD’s Alhambra Headquarters Office and all SMD Maintenance Yards and posted on the LACPW’s internet site. A copy of the City’s SSMP will be maintained by the City’s Director of Public Works at 16600 Civic Center Drive in the City of Bellflower and posted on City’s webpage. The document shall also be made readily available to the State Water Resources Control Board or Regional Water Quality Control Board representatives upon request, to all CMSD Cities, and to the operators of any collection system or treatment facility downstream of the LACPW’s system.
10.4 Audit Implementation and Tracking of Results
The SSMP program audit recommended corrective actions are incorporated into the CIP development and budgeting process to provide the necessary resources to implement audit corrective actions and recommendations. Through that process, implementation progress is measured and reported on an ongoing basis to ensure timely completion of corrective actions. Deficiencies in meeting the schedule are identified or anticipated and mitigation measures developed and implemented to manage completion of the corrective actions from the audit. Each subsequent audit update begins with a review of the previous
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
audit to determine if the corrective action remains relevant and, if so, to reiterate the program deficiency and recommended corrective action in the current SSMP audit report.
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
11 Communication Program
LACPW employs a variety of means for communicating with the public and contract agencies on the development, implementation, and update of the SSMP. The following sections describe LACPW’s procedures for:
• Communicating with the public for spills and discharges resulting in closures of public areas, or that enter a source of drinking water. • Communicating with the public on the development, implementation, and update of its SSMP, including opportunities for public input to Plan implementation and updates.
• Owners/operators of systems that connect into the Enrollee’s system, including tributary systems, for system operation, maintenance, and capital improvement- related activities.
11.1 Procedures to Communicate with Public for Spills and Discharges
LACPW’s procedures for communication with the public for spills and discharges are included in the Spill Emergency Response Plan in Appendix F. Chapter 3 of these procedures provides instructions for communicating with the public when spills result in closure of public areas or entering a source of drinking water.
Within 15 minutes of receiving confirmation that a spill with the potential to reach a storm drain or public waterway has occurred, LACPW’s Field Crew must contact Los Angeles County Department of Public Health through LACPW’s Operator. The Department of Public Health will post and remove signage for waterways and beach closures as required and will not remove the signs until the effects of the spill have been mitigated. A public press release will be made of the temporary closure due to a spill.
11.2 Procedures for General Communication with Public on SSMP
LACPW provides operation and maintenance services for the City’s collection system. The City also benefits from the educational and informational materials that LACPW provide to their service areas. The City provides the following information to the public on their webpage: https://bellflower.ca.gov/departments/public_works/sewer_maintenance.php • Current SSMP
• LACPW website
• LACPW Help line for sewer related issues
• Director of Public Works phone number and email address for inquiries LACPW provides the public and residents in its service areas with educational and informational materials related to the sewer collection system and the sewer maintenance services the County provides. LACPW relies heavily on SMD’s webpage on the LACPW’s
Sewer System Management Plan Bellflower /Los Angeles County Public Works
webpage to provide the public with ample information regarding the SSMP and SSMP program implementation: https://dpw.lacounty.gov/smd/smd/index.cfm The following information is publicly accessible on the LACPW’s webpage:
• Current SSMP
• SSMP Audit Report
• Interactive sewer mapping provides the public with a means to find the sewer map and sewer pipeline servicing their property
• Annual performance reports
• Condition assessment reports
• FOG best management practices
• Homeowner responsibilities
• Outreach Brochures (in multiple languages)
• Answers to frequently asked questions (in multiple languages) • LACPW’s webpage provides a “Contact Us” link providing the public with a phone number for inquiries, an 800 number for emergencies and a mailing address for written inquiries.
• To report urgent problems, LACPW’s webpage provides an emergency contact link:
o https://pw.lacounty.gov/Contact/#emergencyInfo
The public can provide feedback on the SSMP and the performance of the Districts using the online survey located on the LACPW’s Webpage:
• https://ladpw.org/general/survey/index.cfm?pid=ISBQICAK
11.3 Procedures to Communicate with Connecting Systems
and Contract Agencies
LACPW is in constant communication with entities that are connected to the system for operations, maintenance, and spill response related activities including the City of Los Angeles, LACSD, and member cities. For all agencies, SMD communicates with the agency when capital improvement-related activities will impact each other's system. Email broadcasts are sent to member cities to provide updates and communicate deadlines such as audit due dates. The City of Los Angeles also exchange emails with LACPW monthly mainly for billing and flow metering. LACPW maintains constant communication with LACSD, ensuring that at least one of the Districts’ staff serves as the main point of contact.
Additionally, SMD staff also will communicate directly with District staff when necessary for coordination.
14-E
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
ATTENTION: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
FROM: Tae Rhee, Director of Finance/City Treasurer
Anna Garan, Finance Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to adopt Resolution No. 25-31 – A Resolution amending the Operating Budget to carryover and adjust various capital projects, activities, programs, and revenues; and authorizing the City Manager to implement this Resolution.
DATE: September 8, 2025
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On June 12, 2023, the City Council adopted the Operating Budget for fiscal years 2023-2025 (Resolution No. 23-22) and on June 9, 2025, the City Council adopted the 2025-2027 Operating Budget (Resolution No. 25-23). Due to uncompleted multi-year capital projects and certain subsequent activities and developments, budget amendments are necessary for fiscal years 2024-2027.
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
1) Adopt Resolution No. 25-31; or
2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
BUDGET IMPACT
Below is a summary of the proposed budget adjustments, with amounts rounded to the nearest $1,000, $10,000, or $100,000. Details are provided in Exhibit A to Resolution No. 25-31. The City’s Operating Budget will remain balanced and fiscally sound following these amendments.
● Carryover budget and other adjustments for multi-year capital projects and programs, based on available grants and other funding sources, to fiscal years 2025–27 – $3.0 million in appropriations and $3.2 million in grants and other revenues. Budget adjustments related to capital projects in fiscal year 2024–25 total $560,000.
- 1 -
“of BELLFLOWG
«3 StafI-eport
Staff Report – Resolution No. 25-31 amending Operating Budget for FYs 2024-2027 September 8, 2025
BUDGET IMPACT – Continued
Budget adjustment for fiscal year 2024–25 to transfer 50% of the estimated General Fund surplus exceeding $2 million to the General Fund Capital Projects Fund pursuant to the City's budget policy – $4.2 million.
Budget adjustments for fiscal year 2024–25 to align the investment earnings budget with actual revenues – $4.2 million.
Budget adjustment for fiscal year 2024–25 to align the rent revenue budget with actual revenues – $302,000.
Budget adjustment for fiscal year 2024–25 for additional billable hours by the City Attorney's Office exceeding the retainer amount for special projects and other general legal services – $150,000.
Budget adjustments for fiscal year 2024–25 to align the budget with actual transfers in for HOME program administration costs exceeding the allowed grant allowance, along with minor adjustments for necessary debt service payments and transfers in related to the Butterfly Garden Note Payable – $65,000.
ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 25-31 (with Exhibit A) ............................................................................. 3 - 2 -
CITY OF BELLFLOWER
RESOLUTION NO. 25-31
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE OPERATING BUDGET
TO CARRYOVER AND ADJUST VARIOUS CAPITAL
PROJECTS, ACTIVITIES, AND REVENUES; AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO IMPLEMENT
THIS RESOLUTION
THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council finds and declares as follows:
A. On June 12, 2023, the City Council adopted the 2023-2025 Operating Budget (Resolution No. 23-22), and on June 9, 2025, the City Council adopted the 2025-2027 Operating Budget (Resolution No. 25-23); and
B. Due to certain subsequent activities and developments, budget amendments are necessary for fiscal years 2024-2027.
SECTION 2. The City Council approves amendments to the 2023-2025, and 2025-2027 Operating Budget attached as Exhibit “A,” and incorporated by reference, and authorizes the City Manager, or designee to implement this resolution.
SECTION 3. PLANNING AGENCY. Pursuant to Bellflower Municipal Code (“BMC”) § 2.32.050(F), the City Council will act as the Bellflower Planning Agency for purposes of this Resolution. In accordance with Government Code § 65401, the Bellflower Public Works Department prepared and submitted a capital improvement plan (“CIP”) to the Planning Agency. Government Code § 65103(c) requires the Planning Agency to annually review the City’s CIP to determine whether the CIP is consistent with the Bellflower General Plan. The City Council finds that the CIP is consistent with the Bellflower General Plan.
SECTION 4. REAPPROPRIATION. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to reappropriate any unused appropriations for capital projects, special projects, grant programs, and contractual obligations at the close of a fiscal year to a subsequent fiscal year for the Budget and CIP and adjust that fiscal year‘s special and grant revenues and transfers accordingly.
SECTION 5. BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS. In addition to reappropriation, the Budget may also be adjusted as follows:
A. By majority vote of the City Council; or
B. By the City Manager, or designee, pursuant to the approved Policies.
- 3 -
City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 25-31
SECTION 6. CONTRACTING AUTHORITY.
A. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to bid and/or award contracts for the equipment, supplies, and services approved in the Budget in accordance with the BMC.
B. In accordance with the BMC, the City Manager, or designee, is authorized to execute all contracts awarded for equipment, supplies, and services approved in the Budget.
C. For all other services, equipment, and supplies, the City Manager, or designee, is authorized to execute contracts in accordance with the BMC.
SECTION 7. GENERAL FUND RESERVES. At June 30, 2025, the Contingency Reserve is $10 million for cash flow needs and unforeseen contingencies such as emergencies, revenue shortfalls, mandates, or unanticipated inflation; and the Property Acquisition Reserve is estimated $9.2 million, consisting of $7,500,000 for properties held for development/resale and developer loans, and $1,700,000 in cash set aside.
SECTION 8. INVESTMENTS. Government Code § 53607 allows the City Council to delegate investment authority to the City Treasurer, who may then designate persons to implement such authority. The City Council delegates the investment authority to the City Treasurer who is authorized to implement the Investment Policy on the City's behalf.
SECTION 9. This Resolution does not affect any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred before, or preclude prosecution and imposition of penalties for any violation occurring before, this Resolution’s effective date. Any such amended part will remain in full force and effect for sustaining action or prosecuting violations occurring before the effective date of this Resolution.
SECTION 10. If any part of this Resolution or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Resolution are severable.
SECTION 11. Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.
SECTION 12. The Mayor, or presiding officer, is authorized to affix their signature to this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City of Bellflower, and the City Clerk, or her duly appointed deputy, is directed to attest.
SECTION 13. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption. - 4 -
City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 25-31
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELLFLOWER THIS 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025.
Ray Dunton, Mayor
ATTEST:
Mayra Ochiqui, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Karl H. Berger, City Attorney
________________________________________
BY: Justin A. Tamayo, Assistant City Attorney
Attachment:
Exhibit A – Budget Amendments for Fiscal Years 2024-2027 - 5 -
Account Number Fund / Account Description Fiscal Year Carryover Adjustments Adopted
Budget
Amended
Budget
020 47312 9000 Public Arts Fund / Gateway Sign 2024-25 -$ 69,867$ -$ 69,867$ 135 47148 9000 Prop C Fund / Traffic Signal Improvement 2024-25 - 76,311 433,959 510,270 135 47279 9000 Prop C Fund / WSA BF Station 2024-25 - 75,000 - 75,000 030 42054 8010 Special Grants Fund / Homeless Shelter Contract Services 2024-25 - 337,998 978,926 1,316,924 011 47137 9000 GF Capital Proj Fund / Tree Master Plan 2025-26 6,300 - 5,000 11,300 030 35251 Grant Projects Fund / USDA Grant 2025-26 - 11,300 - 11,300 030 47137 9000 Grant Projects Fund / Tree Master Plan 2025-26 - 11,300 - 11,300 030 35070 Grant Projects Fund / HUD EDI Grant 2025-26 100,000 - 350,000 450,000 030 47220 9000 Grant Projects Fund / Aquatic Center Improvements 2025-26 100,000 - 200,000 300,000 030 34005 Grant Projects Fund / State Grant 2025-26 2,100,000 600,000 - 2,700,000 030 47604 9000 Grant Projects Fund / Oak (Youth/Senior) Center 2025-26 2,088,588 - 923,274 3,011,862 024 47048 9000 Park Facilities Fund / Park and Trail Lighting Upgrades 2025-26 50,000 - 100,000 150,000 070 35522 Measure A Fund / Measure A TAP Funds 2025-26 50,000 275,000 149,770 474,770 070 47604 9000 Measure A Fund / Oak (Youth/Senior) Center 2025-26 30,999 - 149,770 180,769 070 47133 9000 Measure A Fund / Grant Planning & Concept Design 2025-26 - 275,000 - 275,000 125 35670 Measure R Fund / Highway Program Grant 2025-26 - (163,435) 556,107 392,672 140 42324 9000 Gas Tax Fund / Bridge Maintenanc e 2025-26 50,000 - - 50,000 140 47152 9000 Gas Tax Fund / Traffic Control / Management System 2025-26 75,000 - - 75,000 320 35532 Measure W Fund / Regional Program Capital Grants 2025-26 136,757 - 12,375,650 12,512,407 320 47013 9000 Measure W Fund / Stormwater Capture / Simms Par k 2025-26 136,757 - 12,375,650 12,512,407 011 47016 9000 GF Capital Proj Fund / Fence/Lots/ROWs 2025-26 30,000 - - 30,000 011 53611 9000 GF Capital Proj Fund / Planning Department Office Renovation 2025-26 - 25,000 - 25,000 011 53612 9000 GF Capital Proj Fund / Building and Safety Office Renovation 2025-26 - 20,000 - 20,000 011 53613 9000 GF Capital Proj Fund / Finance Office Renovation 2025-26 - 35,000 - 35,000 011 53702 9000 GF Capital Proj Fund / Mayne Event Center Flooring Replacement 2025-26 - 65,000 - 65,000 011 53702 9000 GF Capital Proj Fund / Mayne Event Center Flooring Replacement 2026-27 - (50,000) 50,000 - - Capital projects budget carryover and adjustments based on available grants, other funding sources, and actual expenditures. 510 35072 Econ Dev Fund / SBA / Congressional Grants 2025-26 27,262 - 78,000 105,262 510 44547 4002 Econ Dev Fund / Business Assistance Programs - Grant 2025-26 27,262 - 78,000 105,262 - Budget carryover based on available SBA/C ongressional grant funding for small business assistance programs. 135 36540 Prop C Fund / Reimbursed Costs 2025-26 - 50,000 - 50,000 135 42054 3600 Prop C Fund / Contract Services for WSA BF Station 2025-26 - 25,000 25,000 50,000 - Budget adjustment based on updated program expenditure estimates and approved MTA funding. 010 49000 9999 General Fund / Transfers Out 2024-25 - 4,200,000 2,099,280 6,299,280 011 39000 GF Capital Proj Fund / Transfers In 2024-25 - 4,200,000 505,534 4,705,534 - Budget adjustment to transfer 50% of the estimated General Fund surplus exceeding $2 million to the General Fund Capital Projects Fund, pursuant to the City's budget policy.
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO. 25-31
Account Number Fund / Account Description Fiscal Year Carryover Adjustments Adopted
Budget
Amended
Budget
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO. 25-31
010 33000 General Fund / Investment Earnings 2024-25 - 1,821,000 1,424,000 3,245,000 011 33000 GF Capital Proj Fund / Investment Earnings 2024-25 - 853,000 72,000 925,000 012 33000 Public Projects Fund / Investment Earnings 2024-25 - 221,000 117,000 338,000 013 33000 DOT Hwy Relinquishment Fund / Investment Earnings 2024-25 - 86,000 84,000 170,000 100 33000 Prop A Fund / Investment Earnings 2024-25 - 59,000 57,000 116,000 115 33000 Measure M Fund / Investment Earnings 2024-25 - 88,000 51,000 139,000 125 33000 Measure R Fund / Investment Earnings 2024-25 - 105,000 30,000 135,000 135 33000 Prop C Fund / Investment Earnings 2024-25 - 120,000 7,000 127,000 140 33000 Gas Tax Fund / Investment Earnings 2024-25 - 254,000 48,000 302,000 145 33000 RMRA Fund / Investment Earnings 2024-25 - 325,000 50,000 375,000 320 33000 Measure W Fund / Investment Earnings 2024-25 - 285,000 12,000 297,000 - Adjustments based on actual investment earnings.
012 33110 Public Projects Fund / Rent on Pr operty 2024-25 - 302,283 - 302,283 - Adjustment based on actual rent revenue.
010 42032 1400 General Fund / Legal Services / City Attorney 2024-25 - 150,000 289,000 439,000 - Adjustment to account for additional billable hours by the City Attorney's Office exceeding the retainer amount for special projects and other general legal services . 910 39000 HOME Fund / Transfers In 2024-25 - 62,656 - 62,656 - Adjustment based on actual HOME transfers in required to cover program administration costs that exceed the allowed grant al lowance. 710 39000 BFA Debt Service Fund / Transfers In 2024-25 - 1,076 871 1,947 710 48132 5530 BFA Debt Service Fund / Principal - MTB Note 2024-25 - 981 44,175 45,156 - Minor budget adjustments for the Butterfly Garden Note Payable.
14-F
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
ATTENTION: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
FROM: Mayra Ochiqui, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to approve the Minutes of the August 25, 2025, Regular Meeting of the City Council.
DATE: September 8, 2025
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
None
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
1) Approve the August 25, 2025, Regular Meeting Minutes; or
2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.
FISCAL IMPACT
None
ATTACHMENT
Minutes of the August 25, 2025, Regular Meeting… ................... ………………………… 2
MINUTES
CITY OF BELLFLOWER
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BELLFLOWER CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AUGUST 25, 2025
BELLFLOWER CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5:30 P.M. CLOSED SESSION / 7:00 P.M. OPEN SESSION
5:30 P.M. – CLOSED SESSION
1 CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Dunton called the Regular Meeting to order at 5:31 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Bellflower City Hall, 16600 Civic Center Drive, Bellflower.
2 ROLL CALL
The following members of the City Council responded present to roll call:
Mayor Ray Dunton
Mayor Pro Tem Sonny R. Santa Ines
Council Member Dan Koops
Council Member Wendi Morse
Council Member Victor A. Sanchez
3 RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
For the record, 1) City Manager Smoot announced the titles of the Closed Session items; 2) Council Member Morse announced that she would recuse herself from Item 3- B as she has property interests within 500 feet of the subject property; 3) Council Member Koops announced that he would recuse himself from Item 3-C as he has property interests within 500 feet of the subject propert y; 4) Mayor Dunton announced that he would recuse himself from Item 3-B as he has property interests within 500 feet of the subject property; and 5) there being no one from the public in attendance, without objection, Mayor Dunton recessed the Meeting at 5:33 p.m. to a Closed Session regarding:
A CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6)
Agency Negotiators: City Manager, City Attorney, Deputy City Attorney N. Richard Shreiba
Employee Organization: All represented employee bargaining units.
Bellflower City Council Minutes Item No. 3
August 25, 2025 Page 2 of 13
3 RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION – Continued
B CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
(Pursuant to Government Code § 54956.8)
Property: 17416-17422 Bellflower Boulevard Agency Negotiator: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
Negotiating Party: Michael Silyan
Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment
C CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
(Pursuant to Government Code § 54956.8)
Property: 9526 Oak Street
Agency Negotiator: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
Negotiating Party: Michelle Castillo, Broker on behalf of the Joe K.
Andrews Trust/Andrews Family Trust
Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment
For the record, Closed Session adjourned at 6:40 p.m.
4 RECONVENE FOR OPEN SESSION
Mayor Dunton reconvened the Meeting at 7:05 p.m. with all members present and announced that no reportable action was taken during Closed Session.
7:00 P.M. – OPEN SESSION
5 CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Dunton called the Open Session of the Regular City Council Meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
6 ROLL CALL
The following members of the City Council responded present to roll call:
Mayor Ray Dunton
Mayor Pro Tem Sonny R. Santa Ines
Council Member Dan Koops
Council Member Wendi Morse
Council Member Victor A. Sanchez
Bellflower City Council Minutes Item No. 6
August 25, 2025 Page 3 of 13
6 ROLL CALL – Continued
Staff Participants:
Ryan Smoot, City Manager
Karl H. Berger, City Attorney
Mayra Ochiqui, City Clerk
Len Gorecki, Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works N. Richard Shreiba, Deputy City Attorney
Tae G. Rhee, Director of Finance
Brian McNerney, Director of Public Safety
Wangsu Lee, Assistant to the City Manager
Dana Hang, Human Resources and Risk Manager
Dakota Wallace, Management Analyst I
7 INVOCATION
Council Member Victor A. Sanchez offered the Invocation.
8 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Director of Public Safety Brian McNerney led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance.
9-A CITY COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mayor Dunton provided details relative to the State of City presentation to be held on October 2, 2025, at the Mayne Events Center.
Mayor Pro Tem Santa Ines provided details relative to the Los Angeles County Fire Museum’s 9/11 Remembrance Ceremony to be held on September 11, 2025, at 10:00 a.m.
Council Member Morse provided details relative to an upcoming community survey conducted by the City to gather input for the development of the Urban Forest Master Plan.
Council Member Sanchez provided details relative to Asociacion de Emprendedor@s’ free 8-week program to be held every Wednesday from September 10, 2025, through October 29, 2025, at Bellflower City Hall.
Council Member Koops provided details relative to the Parks and Recreation Department’s Leadership Experience and Development (“LEAD”) Program with applications for the eight-week fall session accepted through September 22, 2025.
9-B PRESENTATION: Kingdom Causes Bellflower
Andrew San Nicolas, Executive Director of Kingdom Causes Bellflower, provided a PowerPoint presentation giving an overview of program updates and responded to Council Members’ questions.
Bellflower City Council Minutes Item No. 9-B
August 25, 2025 Page 4 of 13
9-B PRESENTATION: Kingdom Causes Bellflower – Continued
For the record, Council Member Koops expressed a desire to receive a similar presentation each quarter.
10 PUBLIC COMMENTS
Priscilla Brown, resident, expressed noise concerns in the vicinity of Clark Avenue and Oak Street, explaining that 1) live bands and parties occur in her neighborhood at all hours of the day and night; 2) she called the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department to report the noise disturbances, but her concerns were not addressed or resolved; and 3) she is frustrated with the lack of response from the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department.
In response to comments provided by Priscilla Brown, Mayor Dunton suggested that she speak with Director of Public Safety McNerney to discuss the matter further, noting that the City may be able to cite the property owner in the future if the City is made aware of the issue.
Larry Wehage, Bellflower Noon Lions, provided details relative to the 27th Annual Bellflower Car Show to be held on Saturday, October 4, 2025, noting that the Car Show has sold out and registration for the 2026 Car Show is now open.
Robin Snow, resident and Owner of Snow Funeral Services, 1) stated that Snow Funeral Services will be relocating to 9706 Somerset Boulevard , Suite 5; and 2) provided brief information on clubs and organizations within the City and encouraged residents to join them to make a difference in the community.
In response to comments provided by Robin Snow, 1) Mayor Dunton stated that the Elks Lodge is no longer in the City; and 2) Mayor Pro Tem Santa Ines stated that “Wiseman’s Club” is also no longer in the City.
Mathew Brown, resident, stated that a furniture store business on Clark Avenue and Mayne Street leaves their “poop” and garbage on the sidewalk daily, including bulky items, and requested the City look into the issue.
Cheryl Williams, resident, commended and thanked the City for hosting the “Summer Streetfest” events.
11 PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
12 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION
None
Bellflower City Council Minutes Item No. 13-A
August 25, 2025 Page 5 of 13
13 CONSIDERATION ITEMS
A Consideration and possible action to provide direction to the City Manager regarding the future of New Hope Temporary Shelter.
City Manager Smoot introduced the item and announced that Timothy Huynh, Chief Program Officer (“CPO”) of Mercy House, would be assisting with the presentation.
For the record, Council Member Koops 1) announced that he would recuse himself from Item 13-A as he has property interests within 500 feet of the subject property; and 2) left the dais and Council Chambers at 7:51 p.m.
Assistant to the City Manager Lee 1) provided a PowerPoint presentation of the Staff Report; and 2) responded to Council Members’ questions along with City Manager Smoot, City Attorney Berger, and CPO Huynh.
At the request of Mayor Dunton and Council Member Morse, 1) CPO Huynh a) clarified that the average number of residents occupying the Shelter has decreased, noting that approximately 30 to 40 residents occupy the Shelter at one time; and b) confirmed that there are fifteen female beds available at the Shelter; and 2) City Manager Smoot a) explained that the decrease of residents occupying the Shelter may be caused by more “exits”; however, the challenge is not occupying the Shelter, but rather finding permanent placement and additional resources for those entering and exiting the Shelter; and b) stated that staff is working on developing additional outreach services to assist unhoused individuals who are entering and/or exiting the Shelter, further explaining that staff has been working closely with Kingdom Causes Bellflower to develop the services.
In response to questions and comments provided by Council Member Sanchez, CPO Huynh 1) explained that an individual must have an “established tie” to the City in order to be eligible for a bed at the Shelter, further explaining that an “established tie” could include working in the City, attending school in the City, and/or previously residing in the City; 2) clarified that “short term exits” refer to those that enter the Shelter, but leave within one to seven days, further explaining that it is common for unhoused individuals to leave the Shelter quickly because they are unaware of how the Shelter operates and functions, further expressing the opinion that this issue could be alleviated by providing more outreach so those entering the Shelter are fully aware of the expectations and rules; 3) stated that Mercy House provides meals, health care services through L.A. Care, and employment services to residents of the Shelter; and 4) confirmed that Mercy House is looking into becoming “vendorized” by the County of Los Angeles (“County”).
At the request of Mayor Pro Tem Santa Ines, 1) CPO Huynh expressed the opinion that the average length of stay is high because there is not enough affordable housing for residents after leaving the Shelter in addition to a lack of availability of resources for permanently supportive housing; 2) City Manager Smoot a) reiterated that the current challenge is providing additional resources to individuals after they leave the Shelter, noting that there is funding available, but tools are needed to provide the additional resources; and b) explained that the City engages with unhoused individuals primarily through Southwest Patrol and/or the Public Safety Department; however, most that are contacted refuse to enter the Shelter.
Bellflower City Council Minutes Item No. 13-A
August 25, 2025 Page 6 of 13
13 CONSIDERATION ITEMS – Continued
A Consideration and possible action to provide direction to the City Manager regarding the future of New Hope Temporary Shelter – Continued
For the record, at the request of Mayor Pro Tem Santa Ines, City Attorney Berger stated 1) the City’s legal obligations under the 2019 settlement agreement have changed with the City of Grants Pass v. Johson decision, further explaining that the City is no longer legally required to provide beds for unhoused individuals to enforce its anti-nuisance regulations; and 2) if the City Council were to deviate from the obligations outlined in the 2019 settlement agreement, the City Attorney’s Office would inform the Court of the City Council’s action, further clarifying that informing the Court is not a legal requirement, but should be done.
For the record, Mayor Dunton 1) expressed the opinion that the City did not receive what was promised with the consent decree as it was his understanding that an unhoused individual refusing to enter the Shelter would have to leave the City or be jailed; however, this has not been enforced by the County Sheriff’s Department; 2) expressed frustration with the homeless issue within the City, expressing the opinion that what the City is doing to address the issues is not working; and 3) suggested the City look into decreasing the amount of beds provided at the Shelter and utilize the cost savings to increase policing efforts or mental health services for the homeless.
Following brief discussion, Council Member Sanchez 1) expressed the opinion that the current challenge is the lack of mental health and outreach services provided to unhoused individuals, further stating that City staff is not equipped to provide outreach services to assist unhoused individuals with entering and/or exiting the Shelter; 2) suggested a) the City renegotiate with Mercy House to create a “sliding scale” for the amount of beds provided to generate cost savings, further suggesting that the cost savings be used to invest in outreach and mental health experts; and b) the City assist Mercy House with becoming “vendorized” so they can collect funds directly from the County; and 3) expressed the opinion that though the operations of the Shelter are funded largely through the City’s general fund, the Shelter has made a positive impact in the community and it is worth the investment.
Following brief discussion, City Manager Smoot clarified that many external funding sources require the City to maintain at least 30 beds to receive funding.
At the request of Mayor Pro Tem Santa Ines, City Manager Smoot 1) reiterated that staff has been working with Kingdom Causes Bellflower to develop and implement outreach services, noting that a budget amendment may be needed in order to provide these services; and 2) highlighted that the Bellflower Enforcement and Safety Team (“BEAST”) will assist with providing outreach services once created.
Bellflower City Council Minutes Item No. 13-A
August 25, 2025 Page 7 of 13
13 CONSIDERATION ITEMS – Continued
A Consideration and possible action to provide direction to the City Manager regarding the future of New Hope Temporary Shelter – Continued
For the record, Mayor Pro Tem Santa Ines 1) explained that the City has spent approximately $50 million to create and operate the Shelter; however, only $2.9 million in funding was received from the County even though they collected approximately $30 million of the Bellflower’s taxpayers’ dollars through Measure H; 2) stated that County Supervisor Janice Hahn is working diligently to provide additional funding opportunities for cities in the County; 3) expressed the opinion that the City is working to resolve residents’ concerns of homelessness in the City and has made significant progress in addressing those concerns; and 4) suggested that the City continue to provide Shelter services to unhoused individuals even though the operation of the Shetler is funded largely through the City’s general fund, expressing that he feels a moral obligation to continue to help the homeless population.
At the request of Mayor Pro Tem Santa Ines and Council Member Morse, CPO Huynh 1) explained that residents of the Shelte r receive a) three meals per day; b) meet with a Case Manager once per week for assistance with navigating thorough the Coordinate Entry System (“CES”); c) medical assistance as needed; and d) transportation services, further explaining that residents of the Shelter cannot “walk-up” to the doors, but must be brought to the Shelter through the transportation services provided; and 2) confirmed that residents of the Shelter can leave during the day as they please and are not drug tested when returning ; however, the possession of illegal substances is strictly prohibited.
Larry Wehage, resident, stated that it is his understanding that if Mercy House was to become “vendorized” by the County, the Shelter would have to accept unhoused individuals that do not have a n “established tie” to the City.
In response to comments provided by Larry Wehage, Council Member Sanchez reiterated the opinion that if Mercy House were to become “vendorized”, it would allow for greater funding opportunities and additional flexibility.
Jason Barnette, Director of Housing Programs, Kingdom Causes Bellflower, expressed the opinion that a change has occurred within the County and the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (“LAHSA”) regarding funding and resources, further stating that the City’s efforts and determination to find additional funding and solutions has made a positive difference.
At the request of Mayor Dunton and for the benefit of the public, City Manager Smoot clarified that the BEAST Team will be composed of community service officers and maintenance workers to coordinate proactive and daily inspections of encampment areas, which include offering resources to unhoused individuals, performing cleanups, and issuing criminal citations as needed.
Mathew Brown, resident, expressed frustration and the opinion that 1) the Shelter should become “privatized” and not the responsibility of the residents of the City; 2) the Shelter should be “cancelled”, as it was only supposed to be a “five year plan”; and 3) the County Sheriff’s Department has yet to enforce the law when a homeless individual refuses services.
Bellflower City Council Minutes Item No. 13-A
August 25, 2025 Page 8 of 13
13 CONSIDERATION ITEMS – Continued
A Consideration and possible action to provide direction to the City Manager regarding the future of New Hope Temporary Shelter – Continued
Ivan Sulic, Field Deputy, County Supervisor Hahn, 1) thanked the City Council for continuing the Shelter operations and being a leader within the County; 2) stated that the County is in a “transition period”, highlighting that Supervisor Hahn has voted to create the Department of Homeless Services and Housing within the County to create additional funding sources and services; and 3) suggested the City Council continue the Shelter operations and reevaluate the operations at a future date once the County’s Department of Homeless Services and Housing is established and the roles are clearly defined.
In response to questions and comments provided by Mayor Pro Tem Santa Ines relative to how the County is addressing “chronic homelessness”, Field Deputy Sulic explained that the County is working to expand 1) the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (“CARE”) Court, which provides mental health resources; and 2) the Department of Mental Health, highlighting that additional funding was received to expand Metropolitan State Hospital to create a “mental health village”.
At the request of Mayor Pro Tem Santa Ines, Field Deputy Sulic confirmed that he would look into how to make a referral to CARE Court if an unhoused individual has no name.
For the record, Mayor Dunton expressed frustration with the CARE Court program, expressing the opinion that he has not witnessed enforcement or the success of the program, but hopes positive changes occur with the County’s expansion.
Following brief discussion, City Manager expressed the opinion that with strong connections with the County, Kingdom Causes Bellflower, and other outreach providers, more services and solutions will be provided to the City.
At the request of Mayor Pro Tem Santa Ines, 1) City Manager Smoot a) explained that the City is actively working with the County to receive $960,000 in funding for the operation of the Shelter; however, the County has indicated that the City is not able to supplant or replace funding that is currently utilized to operate the Shelter, noting that the City’s argument has been that the City should receive funding for providing these services instead of being penalized for doing so; and b) confirmed the City has requested the County assist with funding the City’s acquisition of the property; and 2) Assistant to the City Manager Lee stated that approximately $1.36 million in funding will be provided by the County in fiscal year 2025-2026, and, as Measure H is sunsetting, an additional $400,000 in Measure A Local Solutions funds will be provided by the County as well.
Bellflower City Council Minutes Item No. 13-A
August 25, 2025 Page 9 of 13
13 CONSIDERATION ITEMS – Continued
A Consideration and possible action to provide direction to the City Manager regarding the future of New Hope Temporary Shelter – Continued
At the request of Mayor Pro Tem Santa Ines, Field Deputy Sulic confirmed that he would look into why the City is being penalized with less funding because it is operating the homeless shelter.
Priscilla Brown, resident, 1) expressed frustration with the homeless issue in the City, expressing the opinion that the City does not “look any better” than other cities that do not have a Shelter; and 2) inquired whether the County Sheriff’s Department can arrest a homeless individual if the individual refuses service, stating that it was her understanding that individuals would be arrested and removed from the City if they refused service.
In response to comments provided by Priscilla Brown, 1) Mayor Dunton a) reiterated that the homeless issue is a concern for the City, expressing the opinion that the quality of life of residents has decreased due to the public nuisances; and b) stated that the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department can legally remove an unhoused individual who refuses service; however, it is not being enforced; and 2) City Manager Smoot clarified that the City has the legal ability to enforce anti-nuisance regulations; however, the “practical” ability is the challenge, highlighting that the City is actively working on developing enforcement tactics to address these issues.
Dan Holguin, Captain, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, relative to public comments provided by Priscilla Brown regarding noise disturbances, stated that 1) he would speak with her to discuss her concerns and apologized for the lack of response; 2) the County Sheriff’s Department can offer conflict resolution services to those that are having issues with their neighbors; and 3) “party” calls are on the lower priority list; however, the issues will be addressed accordingly.
At the request of Mayor Dunton, Captain Holguin confirmed that he would speak to all the residents who recently attended the City Council Meetings to voice concerns related to noise disturbances in their neighborhoods and the lack of response from the County Sheriff’s Department.
In response to questions and comments provided by Mayor Dunton, 1) Captain Holguin a) confirmed that the County Sheriff’s Department makes arrests for trespassing on private property and shoplifting violations; however, arrests are not made for anti-camping violations; and b) clarified that trespassing can be enforced on private property; however, if an individual continues to trespass, they will not be arrested; and 2) City Manager Smoot stated that when an individual is arrested, they are typically not prosecuted, further highlighting that the City and recently formed Station Cities Joint Powers Authority is working with the District Attorney’s Office to increase prosecution efforts.
Bellflower City Council Minutes Item No. 13-A
August 25, 2025 Page 10 of 13
13 CONSIDERATION ITEMS – Continued
A Consideration and possible action to provide direction to the City Manager regarding the future of New Hope Temporary Shelter – Continued
Mitch Haack, resident, expressed the opinion that the operations of the Shelter have made a positive difference in the community.
Darlene Palacios, resident, 1) suggested residents research the “12 myths of homelessness”; and 2) provided an anecdote of an unhoused individual she recently assisted, further expressing the opinion that outreach services can alleviate the issues faced.
Recess: For the record and without objection, Mayor Dunton recessed the meeting at 9:45 p.m. for a brief break.
Reconvene: For the record, Mayor Dunton reconvened the meeting at 9:57 p.m., with all Council Members present, except Council Member Koops, as he was recused on the matter.
For the record, 1) Mayor Pro Tem Santa Ines a) expressed the opinion that the City should continue the operations of the Shelter based on the County providing funding for the operations and acquisition of the property, further stating that he does not want to abandon the Shelter as it is needed in the City; and b) suggested that the City negotiate with Mercy House to operate the Shelter for an additional year with the condition that a) the amount of beds be decreased between 30 to 50 to create costs savings; and b) the County provide the needed funding; 2) Mayor Dunton suggested that any costs savings from the renegotiating of the agreement with Mercy House be applied to additional policing efforts and/or mental health services for the homeless; and 3) Council Member Sanchez a) stated the opinion that creating a “sliding scale” for the amount of beds provided by Mercy House will create more success; and b) suggested that Mayor Pro Tem Santa Ines and himself continue to work with staff to seek ongoing funding for operational costs.
At the request of Council Member Sanchez, City Manager Smoot confirmed that the agreement with Mercy House would be brought back to the City Council at a future date for consideration.
Following discussion and for the record, based on the County contributing funding towards the purchase of the facility, it was the consensus of the City Council to direct staff to 1) negotiate with Mercy House to operate the New Hope Temporary Shelter for an additional year with the flexibility of providing between thirty to fifty beds; 2) continue to work with Mayor Pro Tem Santa Ines and Council Member Sanchez to seek ongoing funding for operational costs; 3) any cost savings from renegotiating the contract with Mercy House be applied to additional policing efforts or mental health services for the homeless; and 4) bring the agreement with Mercy House back to the City Council at a future date for consideration.
For the record, Council Member Koops returned to the Council Chambers and dais at 10:07 p.m.
Bellflower City Council Minutes Item No. 14
August 25, 2025 Page 11 of 13
14 CONSENT CALENDAR
For the record, 1) Council Member Koops announced that he would recuse himself on Item 14-F (Resurfacing of Alondra Boulevard from Bellflower Boulevard to Hayter Avenue) as he owns property within 500 feet of the subject area; 2) Mayor Pro Tem Santa Ines requested that Item 14-F (Resurfacing of Alondra Boulevard from Bellflower Boulevard to Hayter Avenue) be pulled for questions only; and 3) Council Member Koops left the dais and Council Chambers at 10:08 p.m.
With regard to Item 14-F (Resurfacing of Alondra Boulevard from Bellflower Boulevard to Hayter Avenue) and at the request of Mayor Pro Tem Santa Ines and Mayor Dunton, Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works Gorecki 1) stated that the project will be completed within 90 - 120 working days; and 2) confirmed that “duratherm” crosswalks will be installed at the intersection of Bellflower Boulevard and Alondra Boulevard.
For the record, Council Member Koops returned to the Council Chambers and dais at 10:10 p.m.
Following discussion, it was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Santa Ines, seconded by Council Member Koops, and carried without objection, to approve the actions stipulated on the Consent Calendar.
A Consideration and possible action to receive and file Warrant Register No. 26-022, dated August 25, 2025.
Action: Received and filed Warrant Register No. 26-022.
B Consideration and possible action to receive and file the Treasurer’s Report for the Month of July 2025.
Action: Received and filed Treasurer’s Report.
C Consideration and possible action to approve the Minutes of the August 11, 2025, Regular Meeting of the City Council.
Action: Approved the August 11, 2025, Regular Meeting Minutes.
D Consideration and possible action to approve the Minutes of the August 20, 2025, Special Meeting of the City Council.
Action: Approved the August 20, 2025, Special Meeting Minutes.
E Consideration and possible action to authorize the City Manager to execute Agreement File No. 650.2, in a form approved by the City Attorney, with John L. Hunter & Associates, to provide Stormwater Compliance Services.
Action: Authorized the City Manager to execute Agreement File No. 650.2, in a form approved by the City Attorney.
Bellflower City Council Minutes Item No. 14
August 25, 2025 Page 12 of 13
14 CONSENT CALENDAR – Continued
F Consideration and possible action to award a contract to Onyx Paving, Inc., for the Resurfacing of Alondra Boulevard from Bellflower Boulevard to Hayter Avenue, Specifications No. 22/23-05; and authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with Onyx Paving, Inc., in a form approved by the City Attorney.
CEQA: The City reviewed the environmental impacts of the proposed activity pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq. “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal.
Code of Regs. §§ 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”). The activity contemplates awarding a contract to repair and maintain existing improvements.
Accordingly, no further environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15301 (Existing Facilities).
Action: Awarded a contract to Onyx Paving, Inc., for the Project and authorized the City Manager to execute a contract in a form approved by the City Attorney.
G Consideration and possible action to authorize the City Manager to execute Agreement File No. 464.6, in a form approved by the City Attorney, between the City of Bellflower, acting as the Successor Housing Agency to the Dissolved Bellflower Redevelopment Agency and Kingdom Causes Bellflower to renew the Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Services for Fiscal Year 2025-2026.
Action: Authorized the City Manager to execute Agreement File No. 464.6, in a form approved by the City Attorney.
H Consideration and possible action to award a contract to Villa Ford of Orange for the purchase of one new 2025 Ford F-350 regular cab single rear wheel truck with stake bed body for the Public Works Department; and authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with DWWVF, Inc., dba Villa Ford of Orange, in a form approved by the City Attorney.
Action: Awarded a contract to Villa Ford of Orange for the purchase of one new 2025 Ford F-350 regular cab single rear wheel truck with stake bed body; and authorized the City Manager to execute said contract with Villa Ford of Orange, in a form approved by the City Attorney.
15 COUNCIL REPORTS
Mayor Pro Tem Santa Ines made various comments and reports.
Bellflower City Council Minutes Item No. 16
August 25, 2025 Page 13 of 13
16 ADJOURNMENT
Without objection, Mayor Dunton adjourned the meeting at 10:12 p.m. to the next Regular Meeting of the Bellflower City Council at 5:30 p.m. on Monday, September 8, 2025.
Ray Dunton, Mayor
City of Bellflower
ATTEST:
Mayra Ochiqui, City Clerk
Approved: September 8, 2025