Agenda packet, first session — Bellflower City Council, August 10, 2026 (part 2 of 4)

-1-

Staff Report - Building Division User Fee Study
August 10, 2026

Page 2 of 4 ends

PUBLIC NOTICE
A Notice of Public hearing was published twice in the Los Cerritos Community Newspaper on July 31, 2026 and August 7, 2026. On July 27, 2026, a notice was provided in accordance with Government Code § 66016 to Southern California Gas Company, Southern California Edison, and the Building Industry Association pursuant to their written request on file with the City Clerk's Office (i.e., 14 -day notice mailed to anyone who filed a written request for such notice before April 1 of each year). A Notice of Public Hearing was also posted at City Hall, Brakensiek Library, Bellflower Substation, Thompson Park, and Caruthers Park on July 27, 2026.

BACKGROUND
On September 9, 2024, the City Council awarded a contract to Willdan Engineering to provide complete in-house Building Division operations and fire plan check review and inspection services. Willdan Engineering commenced services on September 30, 2024 and was tasked with, among other things, assessing the current operations, identifying areas for improvement, and making the necessary changes to improve services to applicants, including an efficient, effective, and well -functioning Building and Safety Division. As part of that assessment, it was identified that the current permit fee structure presented challenges because plan check, inspection, and MEP fees are collected upfront and rolled collectively into one fee. It was recommended that the plan check, inspection, and MEP fees be separated to not only address accounting challenges, but to also provide clarity to the specific services being paid for.

To correct the challenges with the current fee structure and to ensure appropriate levels of cost recovery for the Building Division operations, the City contracted with Willdan Financial Services to prepare a cost of service and fee analysis commonly referred to as a User Fee Study ("Study").

DISCUSSION
➢ User Fee Study
The principal goal of the Study is to help the City determine the full cost of each service that the Building and Safety Division provides. The total cost of each service included in the study analysis is based on the full cost of providing City services, including direct salaries and benefits of City staff, direct departmental costs, and indirect costs from centralized services and support. The Study determined the full costs recovery fee for the City to provide each service; however, each fee is set at the City Council's discretion, up to 100% of the total cost, as specified in the Study. The Study involved, among other things, the identification of existing and potential new fees, fee schedule restructuring, data collection and analysis, and calculation of individual service costs (fees) or program cost recovery levels. The Study, which includes the proposed fee schedule, is included as Exhibit "A" to Resolution No. 26-32.

The last time the Building and Safety Division user fees were reviewed was in 2023 as part of the comprehensive user fee study. These fees have been adjusted annually by CPI. The proposed fees also reflect a restructuring of the building, plan check and permitting fees structures. If adopted, the new fees will continue to be adjusted annually by CPI.
-2-

Staff Report - Building Division User Fee Study
August 10, 2026

Page 3 of 4 ends

DISCUSSION — Continued
➢ Notable Changes
The most notable changes with the proposed fee schedule include the following:

1. Bifurcating plan check review and permit/inspection fees. Currently, the permit fees include plan check review, inspections, and all associated MEPs into one single fee. This fee is collected upfront at the time of plan check submittal while the associated inspections for the project may not occur until well over a year later. This fee structure presents accounting challenges especially when a refund is requested if the applicant decides not to move forward with the project. Staff is tasked with determining the amount of time spent reviewing individual plans and the costs associated with that review, and then refunding the remainder of the fee.

As proposed, separating the plan check, inspection, and MEP fees helps simplify the fee structure and addresses the accounting challenges allowing for a clear fee structure for applicants and faster processing of administrative requests. In addition, separating the fees clarifies the specific services being paid for.

Additional changes to the MEP fees are described below.

2. Establishing separate MEP fees based on the specific permit request.

Currently, fees for MEPs specifically for residential and commercial projects are included with the permit fee regardless of the number of fixtures, switches, mechanical systems, etc. As proposed, the applicant will need to obtain separate mechanical, electrical, and plumbing permits and the cost of each of those permits will depend on the number and type of equipment being installed. By separating the MEP fees based on the specific permit request, this ensures a more accurate cost recovery because the permit and permit cost is more reflective of the work being done. It also ensures applicants can have a clear understanding of the services associated with each fee.

3. Establishing plan check and permit fees based on the project type. Currently, the fee structure is based on the square footage of the project, regardless of what type of project is proposed. For example, a 2,000 sq. ft. commercial tenant improvement is charged the same permit fee as a new 2,000 sq. ft. residential unit.

As proposed, fees would still be based on the square footage of the project, but are also separated by either residential or commercial project and separated by the project type (e.g., remodel, new construction, conversion, tenant improvement, etc.). As with the MEP fees, establishing permit fees based on the square footage of the project type ensures a more accurate cost recovery because the permit and permit cost is more reflective of the actual work being performed.

4. Clarifying and Adding Appropriate Fire review and inspection fees. Currently, there are only two types of fire related permits in the fee schedule — residential fire sprinklers and commercial fire sprinklers. Due to the increasing demand from applicants choosing to submit fire plans to the City for review (rather than the available alternative of submitting through the Consolidated Fire Protection District), several fire related fees have been added to the fee schedule to appropriately account for these costs.
-3-

Staff Report - Building Division User Fee Study
August 10, 2026

Page 4 of 4 ends

DISCUSSION — Continued
➢ Fee Comparisons
The proposed fee schedule is restructured to better represent the actual services being provided and more accurately account for time spent. While the structures do not allow for direct comparison, the following chart compares the current and proposed fees based on some of the most common project types. The total fees include both plan check review and inspections fees (which would be charged separately under the new structure, but for comparison have been combined in this chart). These fees do not include grading, fire, or MEP fees, which will continue to differ by project.

Project Scope
Current Fees.

Proposed Fees
1 ADU, Ground up <750 sq. ft.
$2,306
$2,783
2 `
ADU, Ground up 1,200 sq. ft.
$4,151
$5,430
3 ;
ADU, Conversion <500 sq. ft.
$1,106
$1,684
4 ADU, Conversion 1,200 sq. ft.
$4,151
$5,127
5 New SFR, ≥1,001 & <2,000 sq. ft.
$4,151
$6,100
6 SFR addition, ≥500 & <1,000 sq. ft.
$2,306
$3,315
7 New multi -family residential, ≥9,000
sq. ft. & ≤10,000 sq. ft.
$12,919
$19,846
8 `;<
Commercial, T.I. 1,500 sq. ft.
$4,151
$5,990
9 Commercial, Ground up 10,000 sq.
ft.
$12,919
$19,791
10``
Commercial, Ground up 20,000 sq.
ft.
$15,542 Deposit,
Fees based on
actual cost
$30,814 Deposit,
Fees based on
actual cost
The current fee schedule is included in Attachment C and the proposed fee schedule is included in Appendix C of the Study. In addition, at the request of the City, Willdan Financial also conducted a fee comparison with five other cities in Los Angeles County, including Downey, Paramount, Lakewood, Cerritos, and Long Beach. The fee comparisons with these cities are included in Attachment D.

CONCLUSION
It is recommended the City Council adopt Resolution No. 26-XX. If adopted, the proposed Building and Safety Division fees will be set at the full costs recovery for the services being requested.

ATTACHMENTS
A. Resolution No. 26-32 5
B. Exhibit A to Resolution No. 26-32 — Building & Safety Division User Fee Study 7 C. Current Fee Schedule 50
D. Fee Comparisons 52
-4-

CITY OF BELLFLOWER
RESOLUTION NO. 26-32

A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN UPDATED BUILDING PERMIT FEE

SCHEDULE TO RECOVER COSTS INCURRED FROM PROVIDING

BUILDING AND SAFETY SERVICES
THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council finds and declares as follows:

A. The City Council may establish fees for services under various provisions of California law including, without limitation, Business & Professions Code § 16000; Government Code §§ 54344, 65104, 65909.5, 65943, 66013, 66014, 66451.2; and Health & Safety Code §§ 17951, 17980.1, and 19852.

B. The Report entitled "Building & Safety Division User Fee Study" dated July 24, 2026, prepared by Willdan Financial Services (the "Fee Study") sets forth a reasonable methodology and analysis for the determination of user fees that may be charged by the City for building services.

C. Pursuant to Government Code § 66016, the City made data available regarding the cost, or estimated cost, of providing building services for the proposed user fees more than ten days before the public hearing held on August 10, 2026; D. On August 10, 2026, the City Council heard public testimony and considered evidence in a public hearing held and noticed in accordance with Government Code §§ 66016 and 66018; and
E. After careful consideration, including review of the documentary and testimonial evidence submitted during the public hearing, the City Council finds that the user fees adopted by this Resolution are in the public interest to recover the costs of building services.

SECTION 2. Based upon the Fee Study, the Fees attached as Exhibit "A," and incorporated into this Resolution as if fully set forth, are approved and adopted.

SECTION 3. Unless otherwise revised, the Fees established by this Resolution will be automatically adjusted by the City Manager on an annual basis on July 1 of each year by up to the percent change of the Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim Area of Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the latest prior 12 -month period ending in March. The first Fee adjustment cannot be made before a minimum of ten months after the effective date of this Resolution. The first Fee adjustment will be made effective August 9, 2027.

Page 1 of 2 ends

-5-

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 26-32

Page 2 of 2 ends

SECTION 4. This Resolution is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Res. Code §§ 21000, et seq.; "CEQA") and CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. §§ 15000, et seq.) because it establishes, modifies, structures, restructures, and approves rates and charges for meeting operating expenses; purchasing supplies, equipment, and materials; meeting financial requirements; and obtaining funds for capital projects needed to maintain service within existing service areas.

SECTION 5. Effective Date. Pursuant to Government Code § 66017, all fees as set forth in Exhibit "A" of this Resolution will become effective 60 days after adoption and will remain effective unless repealed or superseded.

SECTION 6. Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.

SECTION 7. The Mayor, or presiding officer, is authorized to affix its signature to this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City of Bellflower, and the City Clerk, or its duly appointed deputy, is directed to attest.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELLFLOWER THIS 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 2026.

Sonny R. Santa Ines, Mayor
ATTEST:

Mayra Ochiqui, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Karl H. Berger, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT:

Exhibit A — Building & Safety Division User Fee Study
-6-

Building & Safety Division
User Fee Study

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary 1
User Fee Background 2
Policy Considerations 2
Study Objective 3
Scope of the Study 3
Aim of the Report 3
Project Approach and Methodology 4
Conceptual Approach 4
Fully Burdened Hourly Rates 4
Summary Steps of the Study 5
Allowable Costs 5
Methodology 6
Quality Control/Quality Assurance 6
City Staff Contributions 6
Bellflower User Fees 7
Cost Recovery 7
Public Contribution 7
Impact on Demand (Elasticity) 8
Summary 8
Building & Safety 9
Analysis 9
Appendix A — Total Allowable Cost to be Recovered 10
Appendix B —Fully Burdened Hourly Rates 11
Appendix C — Cost Recovery Analysis 13
Appendix D — Full Cost Calculations 30

W I LLDAN
F aeuvices
Building User Fee Study
-8-

Executive Summary
The City of Bellflower (the "City") engaged Willdan Financial Services ("Willdan") to determine the full costs incurred by the City to support the various activities for which the City charges user fees. Due to the complexity and the breadth of performing a comprehensive review of fees, Willdan employed a variety of fee methodologies to identify the full costs of individual fees and program activities. This report and the appendices herein identify 100% full cost recovery for City services and the recommended level of recovery as determined through discussion with departmental staff. The recommended fees identified herein are either at or less than full cost recovery.

W t LLDAN
RAH.. SERVICES
1 Building User Fee Study
-9-

User Fee Background
Policy Considerations
User Fees recover costs associated with the providing specific services benefiting the user, thereby typically reducing the use of General Fund monies for such purposes.

In addition to collecting the direct cost of labor and materials associated with processing and administering user services, it is common for local governments to recover reasonable support costs. Support costs are those costs relating to a local government's central service departments that are allocable to the local government's operating departments. Central services support cost allocations were incorporated using the resulting indirect overhead percentages determined through the City's Cost Allocation Plan. This plan was used in the User Fee study to account for the burden placed upon central services by the operating departments in order to allocate a proportionate share of central service cost through the study.

As labor effort and costs associated with the provision of services fluctuate over time, a significant element in the development of any fee schedule is that it has the flexibility to remain current. Therefore, it is recommended that the City include an inflationary factor in the resolution adopting the fee schedule to allow the City Council, by resolution, to annually increase or decrease the fees.

The City may employ many different inflationary factors. The most commonly used inflator is some form of Consumer Price Index ("CPI") as it is widely well known and accepted. A similar inflator is the Bureau of Labor Statistics employment cost index that has a specific series for state and local government workers.

Since the primary factor for the cost of a City's services is usually the costs of the personnel involved, tying an inflationary factor that connects more directly to the personnel costs is reasonable if there is a clear method, or current practice of obtaining said factor.

Each City should use an inflator that it believes works the best for its specific situation and needs. It is also recommended that the City perform this internal review annually with a comprehensive review of services and fees performed every five years, which would include adding, amending, or removing fees for programs/services.

WILLDAN
.kanc.a. ROWEL.
2 Building User Fee Study
-10-

Study Objective
As the City of Bellflower seeks to efficiently manage limited resources and adequately respond to increased service demands, it needs a variety of tools. A User Fee Study provides assurance that the City has the best information and the best resources available to make sound decisions, fairly and legitimately set fees, maintain compliance with state law and local policies, and meet the needs of the City administration and its constituency. Essentially, a User Fee is a payment for a requested service provided by a local government that primarily benefits an individual or group.

The total cost of each service included in this analysis is based on the full cost of providing City services; including direct salaries and benefits of City staff, direct departmental costs, and indirect costs from central service support. This study determines the full cost recovery fee for the City to provide each service; however, each fee is set at the City's discretion, up to 100% of the total cost, as specified in this report.

The principal goal of the study was to help the City determine the full cost of the services that the City provides. In addition, Willdan established a series of additional objectives including:
• Developing a rational basis for setting fees
• Identifying subsidy amount, if applicable, of each fee in the model • Ensuring compliance with State law
• Developing an updatable and comprehensive list of fees • Maintaining accordance with City policies and goals
The study results will help the City better understand its true costs of providing services and may serve as a basis for making informed policy decisions regarding the most appropriate fees, if any, to collect from individuals and organizations that require individualized services from the City.

Scope of the Study
The scope of this study encompasses a review and calculation of user fees charged by the Building Division.

The study involved the identification of existing and potential new fees, fee schedule restructuring, data collection and analysis, orientation and consultation, quality control, communication and presentations, and calculation of individual service costs (fees) or program cost recovery levels.

Aim of the Report
The User Fee Study focused on the cost of City services, as City staff provide them at existing, or reasonably anticipated service levels and according to staffing needs, and policy and procedure requirements. This report provides a summary of the study results, and a general description of the approach and methods Willdan and City staff used to determine the recommended fee schedule. The report is not intended to document all the numerous discussions throughout the process, nor is it intended to provide an influential dissertation on the qualities of the utilized tools, techniques, or alternative approaches.

W I LLDAN
. •KM1K..xI 301V ICES
3 Building User Fee Study
-11-

Project Approach and Methodology
Conceptual Approach
The basic concept of a User Fee Study is to determine the "reasonable cost" of each service provided by the City for which it charges a User Fee. The full cost of providing a service may not necessarily become the City's fee, but it serves as the objective basis as to the maximum amount that may be collected.

The standard fee limitation established in California law for such fees is the "estimated, reasonable cost" principle. In order to maintain compliance with the letter and spirit of this standard, every component of the fee study process included a related review. The use of budget figures, time estimates, and improvement valuation clearly indicates reliance upon estimates for some data.

Fully Burdened Hourly Rates
The total cost of each service included in this analysis is primarily based on the Fully Burdened Hourly Rates ("FBHRs") that were determined for City personnel directly involved in providing services. The FBHRs include not only personnel salary and benefits, but also any costs that are reasonably ascribable to personnel. The cost elements that may be included in the calculation of fully burdened rates are:
• Salaries & benefits of personnel involved
• Operating costs applicable to fee operations
• Departmental support, supervision, and administration overhead • Indirect City-wide overhead costs calculated through the Cost Allocation Plan An important factor in determining the fully burdened rate is in the calculation of productive hours for personnel. This calculation takes the available workable hours in a year of 2,080 and adjusts this figure to 1,650 productive or billable hours to account for calculated or anticipated hours' employees are involved in non -billable activities such as paid vacation, sick leave, holidays, and other considerations as necessary.

Dividing the full cost, including overhead, of a position by the number of productive hours provides the FBHR.

The FBHRs are then used in conjunction with time estimates, when appropriate for how a service is provided, to calculate a fee's cost based on the personnel and the amount of their time that is involved in providing each service.

W ILLDAN
4 Building User Fee Study
-12-

Summary Steps of the Study
The process of the study is straightforward and simple in concept. The following list provides a summary of the study process steps:

Data Analysis
Department interviews
Time Estimates
Labor Costs
Cost Allocation Plan
Allowable Costs
Building Cost Layers
Direct Services
Indirect Services
Department Overhead
City -Wide Overhead
Set Fees
Define the Full Cost of
Services
Set Cost Recovery Policy
This report identifies three types of costs that, when combined, constitute the fully burdened cost of a service (AppendixA). Costs are defined as
direct labor, including salary and benefits,
departmental overhead costs, and the City's
central services overhead, where
departmental and central service overhead
costs constitute support costs. These cost
types are defined as follows:
• Direct Labor (Personnel Costs): The
costs related to staff salaries for
time spent directly on fee -related
services.
• Departmental Overhead: A
proportional allocation of
departmental overhead costs,
including operation costs such as
Central
Services
Overhead
Departmental
Overhead
Personnel Costs
(Salary & Benefits)
supplies and materials that are necessary for the department to function. • Central Services Overhead: These costs, as provided via the City's Cost Allocation Plan, represent services provided by those Central Services Departments whose primary function is to support other City departments.

WILLDAN
5 Building User Fee Study
-13-

Methodology
The method of analysis for calculating fees used in this report are the:

Case Study Method (Standard Unit Cost Build -Up Approach): This approach estimates the actual labor and material costs associated with providing a unit of service to a single user. This analysis is suitable when City staff time requirements do not vary dramatically for a service, or for special projects where the time and cost requirements are easy to identify at the project's outset. Further, the method is effective in instances when a staff member from one department assists on an application, service or permit for another department on an as -needed basis. Costs are estimated based upon interviews with City staff regarding the time typically spent on tasks, a review of available records, and a time and materials analysis.

Quality Control/Quality Assurance
All study components are interrelated, thus flawed data at any step in the process will cause the ultimate results to be inconsistent and unsound. The elements of our Quality Control process for User Fee calculations include:
• Involvement of knowledgeable City staff
• Clear instructions and guidance to City staff
• Reasonableness tests and validation
• Normalcy/expectation ranges
• Peer and Manager reviews
• Cross-checking
City Staff Contributions
As part of the study process, Willdan received tremendous support and cooperation from City staff, which contributed and reviewed a variety of components to the study, including:
• Budget and other cost data
• Staffing structures
• Fee and service structures, organization, and descriptions • Direct and indirect work hours (billable/non-billable) • Time estimates to complete work tasks
• Review of draft results and other documentation
• Suggested fees for Council consideration
A User Fee Study requires significant involvement of the managers and line staff from the departments on top of their existing workloads and competing priorities. The contributions from City staff were critical to this study. We would like to express our appreciation to the City and its staff for their assistance, professionalism, positive attitudes, helpful suggestions, responsiveness, and overall cooperation.

WWILLDAN
6 Building User Fee Study
-14-

Bellflower User Fees
Cost Recovery
The cost recovery models, by department/division fee type, are presented in detail in Appendix C. Full cost recovery is determined by summing the estimated amount of time each position (in increments of minutes or hours) spends to render a service. Time estimates for each service rendered were obtained through interviews conducted with City staff for each department/division fee included in the study. The resulting cost recovery amount represents the total cost of providing each service. The City's current fee being charged for each service, if applicable, is provided in this section, as well, for reference.

It is important to note that the time data used to determine the amount of time each employee spends assisting in the provision of the services listed on the fee schedule is essential in identifying the total cost of providing each service, and will differ from City to City depending on staffing, positions involved, experience on staff, the use of consultants, and the policies and procedures in place for each City.

Specifically, in providing services, a number of employees are often involved in various aspects of the process, spending anywhere from a few minutes to several hours on the service.

The primary goal of this study was to identify the cost of City services, to provide information to help the City make informed decisions regarding the actual fee levels and charges. The responsibility of determining the final fee levels is a complicated task. City staff must consider many issues in formulating recommendations, and the City Council must consider those same issues and more in making the final decisions.

City staff assumes the responsibility to develop specific fee level recommendations to present to the City Council. Unfortunately, there are no fixed rules to guide the City, since many of the considerations are based on the unique characteristics of the City of Bellflower, and administrative and political discretion. However, in setting the level of full cost recovery for each fee, one should consider whether the service solely benefits one end user or the general community.

Public Contribution
The general concept for a user fee is that individuals (or groups) who receive a private benefit should pay 100% of the full cost of services provided to that individual (or group) that is separate from the general public. Services that are a public benefit should be funded entirely by the general fund's tax dollars.

Unfortunately, for the decision makers, some services fall into the range between these two extremes.

Reduced fees may constitute a public benefit as it encourages certain activities (such as to ensure public safety) or allow some people to be able to afford to receive services they otherwise could not at the full cost.

Despite the intent, it is important for the City and public to understand that reduced fee recovery ordinarily results in the General Fund paying for the difference in cost versus fee amount.

W I LLDAN
7 Building User Fee Study
-15-

Impact on Demand (Elasticity)
Economic principles of elasticity suggest that increased costs for services (or higher fees) will eventually reduce the demand for the services; whereas lower fees may spark an incentive to utilize the services and encourage certain actions. Either of these results may be desirable to the City. However, the level of the fees that would cause demand changes is largely unknown. The cost of service study did not attempt to evaluate the economic or behavioral impacts of higher or lower fees; nevertheless, the City should consider the potential impacts of these issues when deciding on fee levels.

Summary
City staff is recommending setting user fees at 100% of the full cost identified in this study except for specific considerations where it makes sense. City and departmental goals, City Council priorities, policy initiatives, past experience, implementation issues, and other internal and external factors should influence recommendations and City Council decisions. In this case, the proper identification of additional services (new or existing services) and updating to a consistent and comprehensive fee schedule were the primary objectives of this study. City staff has reviewed the full costs and identified the recommended fee levels for consideration by City Council. The attached appendices exhibit these unit fees individually.

The preceding sections provide background for each department or division and the results of this study's analysis of their fees. For the full list of each fee's analysis, refer to Appendix Cof this report.

WW I LLDAN
8 Building User Fee Study
-16-

Building & Safety
The Building & Safety Division of the Planning Department is responsible for the enforcement of City standards governing the construction, alteration, and maintenance of buildings and structures.

This includes building, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, energy, accessibility, and engineering plan check services, administration of abatement programs for substandard and unsafe structures, and providing State and local code administrative interpretations.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with the Building & Safety Division. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of Building & Safety flat fee services relied upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence was determined using staff and consultant time involved in providing services to recover the direct cost of personnel involved and the pro -rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City central services.

City staff reviewed each service and identified the activities necessary to process applications, conduct plan reviews, perform inspections, provide administrative support, and complete other related tasks involved with ensuring compliance with the Building Code. These estimated service times were then multiplied by the respective fully burdened hourly rates of personnel to determine the full cost of providing each service.

Based on the analysis, the City developed a revised Building & Safety fee schedule designed to recover up to 100 percent of the estimated cost of providing services. The proposed fees and associated cost calculations are detailed inAppendixC& D.

WW I LL DAN
,tiAr4L Al SERVICES
9 Building User Fee Study
-17-

Appendix A — Total Allowable Cost to be Recovered
Below are the total allowable costs that may be recovered through User Fees; however, only a percentage of the total allowable cost is realized as staff not only works on services related to User Fees, but also works on an array of other City functions during the operational hours of the City. The Fiscal Year End 2027 budget was used as the cost basis for overhead calculations. The amounts listed below will not reconcile to City budgets as costs that should not be included in overhead for personnel in the application of determining fully burdened hourly rates were excluded. Examples of these costs are capital, debt, monetary transfers, contract costs, and any other costs that are charged directly to the service requestor.

City of Bellflower- User Fee
Overhead Rate Calculations
Department
Total Personnel
Department
Operations & Indirect Direct Indirect
Administration Allocation Overhead % Allocation 4
Nanning 2,306,858
204,711
520,023
3%
21%
Building 1,455,000
155,216
67,262
11%
4%

W I LLDAN
iERVICES
10 Building User Fee Study
-18-

Appendix B —Fully Burdened Hourly Rates
Below are fully burdened hourly rates of staff positions that provide for the services detailed in Appendix C. The FBHRs were used to determine the full cost of each service. They include the salary and benefit costs for each position as well as all applicable overhead amounts for each position. The total salary and benefits are then divided by 1,650 productive or billable hours to reduce the total 2,080 workable hours in a year to remove hours when positions are paid but not on the job such as holidays, paid leave, and sick pay. A further reduction of under 10% is made for administrative, general, or non-specific work hours. For any user fee service request that is outside the scope of the fees detailed in Appendix C, or for services for which there is no fee currently set, the City can charge up to the full cost of the FBHR for personnel involved. An example of a fully burdened hourly rate calculation is below which details how the direct and indirect overheads for each department in Appendix A are applied to the Salary & Benefit (S&B) hourly rates.

The department overhead factors in AppendixA are applied to each City position and contracted position based on where they are located and budgeted so that the operating cost is appropriately applied. Contract employees that work at the City and utilize the City resources to provide services included in this study have the Direct Overhead applied as well as the Indirect Overhead, while contract employees that work externally only have the Indirect Overhead applied which includes the support from the central functions of the City as determined through the Cost Allocation Plan.

Position
5&B Hourly Direct Indirect FuRy Burdened
Rate Department Overhead Overhead % Hourly Rate

DIRECTOR OF PLANNING

BUILDING OFFICIAL

PERMIT TECHNICIAN
A
$269.00
$155.00
$75.00

PLANNING

BUILDING

BUILDING
B
C
9%
21%
11%
4%
11%
4%
A*(1+B)*(1+C)
$353.50
$178.70
$86.47
IfiLV I LLDAN
. rl. ANC, LL.SERVICES
11 Building User Fee Study
-19-

City of Bellflower - User Fee
Fully Burdened Hourly Rate Calculation
Department City Position
Planning Plan - ASSOCIATE PLANNER
Planning Plan - DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
Planning Plan - EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT II
Planning Plan - PLANNING MANAGER
Planning Plan - SENIOR PLANNER
Contract Positions
Building Willdan - Project Manager
Building Willdan - Building Official
Building Willdan - Fire Marshall
Building Willdan - Licensed Engineer/Architect Plans Examiner Building Willdan - Fire Plans Examiner
Building Willdan - CASp Plans Examiner
Building Willdan - Civil Engineer Plans Examiner
Building Willdan - Geotechnical Engineer Plans Examiner Building Willdan -Senior Plans Examiner
Building Willdan - Plans Examiner
Building Willdan -Senior Building Inspector
Building Willdan - Building Inspector
Building Willdan - Fire Inspector
Building Willdan - CASp Inspector
Building Willdan - Civil Engineer Inspector
Building Willdan - Geotechnicial Inspector
Building Willdan - Senior Permit Technician
Building Willdan - Permit Technician
Building Willdan -Administrative Assistant
Building Stormwater Water Permit Compliance Engineer
Building Principal Consultant
A
S&B
Hourly
Rate
B
C A x(1+B)x(1+C)
Fully Burdened
Direct % Indirect % Hourly Rate
$98.55

8.87%

20.71%
$129.52
$269.00

8.87%

20.71%
$353.50
$104.23

8.87%

20.71%
$136.98
$201.66

8.87%

20.71%
$265.02
$121.44

8.87%

20.71%
$159.59
$160.00

0.00%

4.18%
$166.68
$155.00

10.67%

4.18%
$178.70
$155.00

0.00%

4.18%
$161.47
$135.00

10.67%

4.18%
$155.64
$135.00

0.00%

4.18%
$140.64
$135.00

0.00%

4.18%
$140.64
$145.00

0.00%

4.18%
$151.06
$145.00

0.00%

4.18%
$151.06
$135.00

0.00%

4.18%
$140.64
$125.00

10.67%

4.18%
$144.11
$115.00

10.67%

4.18%
$132.58
$95.00

10.67%

4.18%
$109.53
$115.00

0.00%

4.18%
$119.80
$135.00

0.00%

4.18%
$140.64
$145.00

0.00%

4.18%
$151.06
$145.00

0.00%

4.18%
$151.06
$85.00

10.67%

4.18%
$98.00
$75.00

10.67%

4.18%
$86.47
$65.00

0.00%

4.18%
$67.72
$160.00

0.00%

4.18%
$166.68
$160.00

0.00%

4.18%
$166.68

WW I LLDAN
12 Building User Fee Study
-20-

Appendix C — Cost Recovery Analysis
The following tables provide the results of the analysis, resulting full cost recovery amount, and recommended fees.

All services and fees analyzed as part of this study are defined as fees under California law and fall under one or multiple categories of the exemptions defined in Proposition 26 of being either a specific government service or a regulatory or licensing fee. A cost analysis was performed to calculate the estimated reasonable full cost of each service, and suggested fees are recommended at or below those amounts. Estimated reasonable full costs were calculated based on City expenditures and time estimates.

Fees that include consultant or professional services include the cost of those third parties as well as administrative overhead of 4% which is the Building indirect overhead rate determined in the City's most recently completed Cost Allocation Plan from 2021. Any Building consultant or professional services that work onsite at the City include an additional 11% direct overhead (as shown Appendix A) as they utilize the City facilities and incur the departments other operating expenses.

WILLDAN
13 Building User Fee Study
-21-

Building Fees
.:
"A,-.$i`M"S t' :-! ! {, i� ty�z'`1, --Ii t� e c'es}`
-,r� ci;' ?'t k 5 T''s: , t'� .r'. .", €,�k'�lM' .#t*rs' .�''i'`.`��_ „ .. #
Type
Subtype
Subtype II
Subtype III
1 Buildin g Permit
ADU Ground up
10000 sqft
25 t uuciing Pla ii Check
Co mmercial - New Constructio n
e 500 SOFT
26 building Plan Check
Commercial - New Con struction
500 - 1000 sqft
27 Building Plan Check
Co mmercial - New Con stru ctio n
1001- 2000 sqft
28 Building Plan Check
Co mmercial - New Co nstruction
200'1.3000 soft
29 Building Plan Check
Co mmercial - New Construction
See No te 1
3001.4000 sun
30 Building Plan Check
Commercial - New Con structio n
See Note 1
4001-5000 snit
F ull C ost
Suggested Fee
Notes
S ubsidy %
$ 1,547 .78
$
1,547.00
0%
$ 2,300.05
$
2,300 .00
0%
$ 3,095 .55
$
3,095.00
0%
$ 1,187.50
$
1,187.00
0%
$ 1,635.86
5 1,635 .00
0%
$ 2,286 .33
$
2,286 .00
0%
$ 884 .86
$
884 .00
_ 0%
$ 2,122 .79
5 2,122 .00
0%
$ 2,933 .19
$
2,933 .00
0%
$ 751 .83
5 751 .00
0%
$ 1,612.51
$
1,612.00
0%
$ 2,145 .69
$
2,145.00
0%
$ 1,945.53
$
1,945 .00
0%
$ 2,785.71
$
2,785.00
0%
$ 3,493.31
$
3,493.00
0%
$ 4,245.58
$
4,245.00
0%
$ 5,130.43
$
5,130 .00
0%
$ 6,280.46
$
6,280.00
0%
$ 7,563.06
$
7,563.00
0%
$ 8,550 .72
$
8,550.00
0%
$ 9,110.84
$
9,110.00
0%
$ 9,670.96
$
9,670.00
0%
$ 9,995 .70
$
9,995.00
0%
$ 15,748.70
$
15,748.00

DEPOSIT
0%
$ 1,342.73
$
1,342.00
0%
$ 1,811 .72
$
1,811.00
0%
$ 2,406.46
$
2,406.00
0%
$ 3,519. 66
$
3,519.00
0%
$ 4,406.27
$
4,406.00
0%
$ 5,307.78
$
5,307.00
0%
14 Building Fees
#
Type
Subtype
Subtype II
Subtype III
31 i;uildin g Plan Check
Commercial - New Construction
See Note 1
5ti01.6000 soft
32 building Plan Check
Co mmercial - NeW C onstructi on
See Note 1
6001-400 sort
33 Buildin g Plan Check
Co mmercial - New Construction
See Note 1
700'1-B000 Sgft
34 r?undin g Plan Check
Commercial - New Constructi on
See Note 1
8001-9000 soft
35 s,,iIding Plan Che ck
Commercia l - New Construction
See N ote 1
9001-10000 soft
36 !nl, Plan Che ck
Co mmercial - Ne w Construction
See Note 1
>10000 srifi
37 Buildin g Permit
Re siden tial - SFR New Construction
10000 sqft
49 ,:::din g Plan Check
Residential - SFR New Construction
:' 00 St tf l
50 Building Plan Check
Residential - SFR New Construction
500 »1000 soft
51 Building Pla n Check
Residential - SFR New Co nstruction
1001- 2000 sqft
52 Building Plan Check
Residential - SFR New Construction
2001.3000 silft
Full Cost
Suggested Fee
N ot es
S ubsidy %
$ 6,397 .33
$
6,397.00
0%
$ 7,328 .61
$
7,328.00
0%
$ 8,364 .08
$
8,364 .00
0%
$ 9,074.85
$
9,074.00
0%
$ 9 ,747.23
$
9,747.00
0%
$ 15,017 .06
$
15,017 .00

DEPOSIT
0%
$ 2,033.44
$
2,033.00
0%
$ 2,991.31
$
2,991.00
0%
$ 3,551 .43
$
3,551.00
0%
$ 4,907.06
$
4,907.00
0%
$ 5,747 .24
$
5,747.00
0%
$ 6,852.59
$
6,852.00
0%
$ 7,957 .93
$
7,957.00
0%
$ 9,064 .72
$
9,064.00
0%
$ 10,036 .05
$
10,036.00
0%
$ 11 ,513.69
$
11,513 .00
0%
$ 12,693.50
$
12,693.00
O%
$ 14,330.62
$
14,330 .00

DEPOSIT
0%
$ 1,284 .60
$
1,284 .00
0%
$ 1,893.75
$
1,893.00
0%
$ 2,500. 99
$
2,500.00
0%
$ 3,744.43
$
3,744.00
0%
15 Building Fees
k
type
Subtype
Subtype II
Subtype III
53 .nildin�, . _,.,. .

Re sidential - SFR New C onstruction
See Not e 1
;3001.4000 sqft
54 :;r,iiding Plaii Check
Residential - SFR New C onstruction
See N ot e 1
4001-5000 sgft
55 Buildin g Plan Che ck
Residential - SFR New Construction
See N ote 1
5001-6000 soft
56 Building Plan Check
Residential - SFR New Construction
See Not e 1
6001.7000 sgft
57 Building Plan Che ck
Residential - SFR New Co nstruction
See Note 1
7001-8000 sqft
58 Building Plan Check
Residential - SFR New Co nstruction
See Note 1
f3001-9000 sgft
59 Building Plan Check
Residential - SFR New Construction
See Note 1
900110000 sqft
60 Bu ilding Plan Check
Re sidential - SFR New Construction
See Note 1
>10000 stift
61 Building Pe rmit
Residential - Addition
2000 sqft
65 Building Plan Check
Residential - Addition
2000 sqft
73 Plan Check
Residential - Remodel
X600 SCOT'
74 Building Plan Check
Residential - Remodel
500.1000 sqft
75 Buildin g Plan Check
Residential - Remodel
1001- WOO sqft
76 buildin g Plan Check
Residential - Re mo de l
See Note 1
- 2000 SqI
Full C ost
Suggest ed Fee
Not es
Subsidy %
$ 4,472.30
$
4,472.00
0%
$ 6,028 .99
$
6,028 .00
0%
$ 7,051 .77
$
7,051 .00
0%
$ 8,313.54
$
8,313.00
0%
$ 9,738.54
$
9,738 .00
0%
$ 10,871 .84
$
10,871.00
0%
$ 13,304.67
$
13,304.00
0%
$ 15,031.01
$
15,031 .00

DEP OSIT
0%
$ 1,237.93
$
1,237 .00
0%
$ 1,783.16
$
1,783.00
0%
$ 3,006.20
$
3,006 .00
0%
$ 3,846 .38
$
3,846.00

DEPOSIT
0%
$ 1,187.19
$
1,187 .00
0%
$ 1,483.36
$
1,483 .00
0%
$ 2,525.96
$
2,525 .00
0%
$ 3,427 .93
$
3,427.00

DEPOSIT
0%
$ 589.90
$
589 .00
0%
$ 1,252.82
$
1,252 .00
0%
$ 2,475.87
$
2,475.00
0%
$ 3,448.63
$
3,448 .00

DEPOSIT
0%
$ 581.40
$
581 .00
0%
$ 964.52
$
964 .00
0%
$ 1,726. 32
$
1,726.00
O%
$ 2,910.04
$
2,910.00

DEPOSIT
0%
16 Building Fees
#
Type
Subtype
Subtype II
Subtype III
77 Building Permit
Residential - Multi -Family New
Co nstruction/Addition
10000 sqft
89 Buddin g Plan Check
Re aideritiai - Multi-Fanuty Nei,'
Construction/Addition
<SO(i SCif.i.
90 wilding Plan Check
- Multi-Fanrtiy New
Constructiob/Addition
00 -1000 sgtt
500
91 building Plan Check
Residentia l - Matti -Family New
Construction/Additio n

1. 001 =7000 :kilt
92 :inkling Plan Check
Residential - Multi -Family New
C U r t a t r it C t l n n/ Ad d l t k ri
1001. -9000 sr ft.
{
93 -:g Plan Check
I?etJUrttiSl-lViulti=Family iJr..:,,
Construction/Addition
See Note 1
3001.4000 snit
94 building Plan Check
Re sidential - Multi-Fan-illyN 1•
Construction/Addition
See Note 1
4001-5000 sgft
95 ,wilding Plan Checkqft
Residential - Multi-Fantily Nee;
Construction/Addition
See No te 1
5001-6000 s
96 wilding Plan Check
Re sidential - Muiti-farriily NB,.' ;
Constructio n/Addition
See Note 1
6001-7000 soft
q
Full Cost
Suggested Fee
N otes
Subsidy %
$ 2,741.03
$
2,741.00
0%
$ 4,096.66
$
4,096.00
0%
$ 5,482.07
$
5,482.00
0%
$ 6,734.89
$
6,734.00
0%
$ 7,192 .21
$
7,192.00
0%
$ 7,649.53
$
7,649.00
0%
$ 8,239.44
$
8,239 .00
0%
$ 8,756.32
$
8,756 .00
0%
$ 9,339.50
$
9,339.00
0%
$ 9,627.73
$
9,627.00
0%
$ 10,174.40
$
10,174.00
0%
$ 12,076.69
$
12 ,076.00

DEP OSIT
O%
$ 1,980.81
$
1,980.00
0%
$ 2,889 .13
$
2,889.00
0%
$ 3,556 .99
$
3,556.00
0%
$ 4,752.26
$
4,752.00
0%
$ 6,277.42
$
6,277.00
0%
$ 7,047.30
$
7,047.00
0%
$ 7,644.19
$
7,644 .00
0%
$ 8,292.80
$
8,292.00
0%
17 Building Fees
Mr
St
Type
Subtype
Subtype II
Subtype III
97 iidi,i " ., +.
e a it /Ad+iitlen
See Note 1
l001-8000 Soft.
98'gilding
Plan Che ck
iteekla;btlal . Iviulu- Fai ul / Nee!
ro nstructioniArici €tior
S ee N ote 1
I3001-90450 golf.
99 Building Plan Che ck
fte;identiai - Multiiiilulti-Fdie,v ;
L, onstruction jAcit{ition
S ee N ote 1
%60'1=10000 sgr-
100
building Plan Check
€ esidential - Multi -Family Nevi
constrortinn/Additini k
See Note 1
X10006 soft
101
Building Permit
Commercial - Tenant Improvement
10000 sqft
113
building Plan Che ck
Commercial - Tenant Improvement
<500 SQFT
114
:-gilding Plan Check
Commercial - Te nant Impro vement
500 - 1000 sqft
115
buildin g Plan Check
Commercial - Tenant Improvement
L00'1 - 2000 :R ift
116
building Plan Check
Commercial - Tenant Improvement
2001-3000 sqft
Full C ost
Suggested Fee
N otes
Subsidy %
$ 8,817.25
$
8,817 .00
0%
$ 9,220.44
$
9,220.00
0%
$ 9,623 .62
$
9,623.00
0%
$ 13,606.91
$
13,606.00

DEPOSIT
0%
$ 1,620.79
$
1,620.00
0%
$ 2,431 .19
$
2,431.00
0%
$ 3,374 .17
$
3,374 .00
0%
$ 4,066.88
$
4,066 .00
0%
$ 4,774 .47
$
4,774.00
0%
$ 5,437.39
$
5,437.00
0%
$ 6,456.27
$
6,456.00
0%
$ 6,986.61
$
6,986.00
0%
$ 7,606.30
$
7,606.00
0%
$ 8,092.44
$
8,092.00
0%
$ 8,578.58
$
8,578.00
0%
$ 10,025.48
$
10,025.00

DEPOSIT
0%
$ 1,468.47
$
1,468.00
0%
$ 1, 879.34
$
1,879 .00
0%
$ 2,567.65
$
2,567.00
0%
$ 3,096. 01
$
3,096 .00
0%
18 Building Fees
M
Type
Subtyp e
Subtyp e II
Subtype III
117
Buildin g Plan Check
Commercial - Tenant Improvement
S ee N ot e 1
3001-4000 sqft
118
Buildin g Plan Check
Commercial -Tenant Improvement
Se e Not e 1
4001.5000 sqft
119
Building Plan Check
Commercial -Tenant Improvement
Se e Not e 1
5001.6000 sqft
120
Building Plan Check
Comme rcial - Tenant Improveme nt
S ee Note 1
6001.7000 sqft
121
Building Plan Check
Commercial - Tenant Improvement
See Note 1
7001-8000 sqft
122
Building Plan Check
Co mmercial - Tenant Improvement
See Not e 1
8001.9000 sqft
123
Bu ilding Plan Check
Commercial -Tenant Improvement
See Note 1
9001-10000 sqft
124
Building Plan Check
Commercial -Tenant Improvement
See Note 1
'10000 sqft
125
Juilding Pla n Check
Basic Bu ildin g Permits (Windo w
Change Outs, Block Walls,
Stucco /Siding or other similar
activity as dete rmine d by BIdOff or
his/her designee - Plan Check
Hourly Rate . Min . 1/2 hour
126
Building Permit
Basic Building Permits (Blo ck Walls,
Stucco /Siding or other similar
activity as determined by BidOff or
his/her designee )
127
.'iumbing Plan Check
Pl,imbing Plan Check Only
First Hour Full Cost then Ho urly Rate
128
-i+echanical Plan Check
Mechanical Pla n Check Only
First Hour Full Cost then Hourly Rate
129
t_learica i Pia❑ Check
Electrical Plan Check Only
First Hour Full Cost then Hourly Rata
130
Building Permit
Signage
Building Sign
131
Freestanding Sign
132
Sign Circuit
133
Add'nl Circuits (ea)
134
Windows/Doors
Indifferent
1 to 10
135
11 to 25
136
26 to 50
Full Cost
Suggested F ee
Notes
S ubsidy X
$ 3,951 .40
$
3,951.00
0%
$ 4 ,283 .30
$
4,283.00
0%
$ 5,106 .94
$
5,106.00
0%
$ 6,072 .85
$
6,072.00
0%
$ 6,551.73
$
6,551.00
0%
$ 6,960.29
$
6,960 .00
0%
$ 7,492.40
$
7,492 .00
0%
$ 8,422 .49
$
8,422.00

DEPOSIT
0%
$ 109.71
$
109.00
plus
$82/additional
1/2 hr
1%
$ 309.84
$
309 .00
0%
$ 183.87
$
183.00
plus
$162/additional
1 hr
0%
$ 240.41
$
240.00
plus
$162/additional
1 hr
0%
$ 240.41
$
240.00
plus
$162/additional
1 hr
0%
$ 81.18
$

81.00 0%
$ 162.37
$
162 .00
0%
$ 81. 18
$
81 .00
0%
$ 36.99
$

36.00 3%
$ 59.09
$

59.00 0%
$ 81.18
$
81 .00
0%
$ 129. 22
$
129 .00
0%
19 M
Type
S ubtype
Subtype
Subtype III
137
51 to 100
138
101 to 175
139
175 to 250
140
>250 (combination of above)
141
Mechanical Pe rmit

HVAC/FAU
residential
10,000 CFM (combination of above)
153
Con de nser/Compressor
residential
>1HP
154
1HP-3HP
155
4HP-7HP
156
8HP-10HP
157
> 10 HP (combination of above)
158
co mmercial
>1HP
159
DAP -3HP
160
4HP-7HP
161
8HP-10HP
162
>10 HP (combin ation of above)
163
Duct Work
residential
> 20 FT
164
20 -100 FT
165
>100 FT (combinatio n of above)
166
commercial
> 20 FT
167
20 - 100 FT
168
>100 FT (combin ation of above )
169
Ho od
residen tial
250 CFM
171
commercial
< 250 CFM
FuII Cost
Sugg est ed Fee
Not es
Subsidy %
$ 177.26
$
177.00
0%
$ 252 .49
$
252.00
0%
$ 324.74
$
324 .00
0%
$ 59 .09
$
59 .00
0%
$ 81 .18
$
81 .00
0%
$ 129 .22
$
129.00
0%
$ 96 .08
$

96.00 0%
$ 129.22
$
129.00
0%
$ 177.26
$
177.00
0%
$ 59 .09
$

59.00 0%
$ 81 .18
$

81.00 0%
$ 129.22
$
129 .00
0%
$ 48.04
$

48.00 0%
$ 59 .09
$

59.00 0%
$ 96.08
$

96.00 0%
$ 129.22
$
129.00
0%
$ 59 .09
$
59 .00
0%
$ 96.08
S

96.00 0%
$ 129 .22
$
129.00
0%
$ 162.37
$
162.00
0%
$ 48 .04
$

48.00 0%
$ 59.09
$

59.00 0%
$ 59.09
$

59.00 0%
$ 96. 08
$

96.00 0%
$ 48.04
$
48 .00
0%
$ 59. 09
$

59.00 0%
$ 96.08
$
96 .00
0%
20 Building Fees
.7.,J4 .f

k
Type
Subtype
Subtype II
Subtype III
172
250 - 1000 CFM
173
1000 - 2000 CFM
174
>2000 CFM (combination of above)
175
Ventilation Fans
1HP
183
1HP-3HP
184
4HP-7HP
185
8HP-10HP
186
>10 HP (combination of ab ove)
187
commercial
>1HP
188
1HP-3HP
189
4HP-7HP
190
8HP-10HP
191
>10 HP (combination of abo ve)
192
Wall Heater/Furnace
indifferent
193
Electrical Permit
Pane l Upgrade
residential
1600 AMP (combination of above)
198
commercial
1600 AMP (combination of above)
203
New Panel
Indifferent
1600 AMP (combination of above)
208
Subpanel
Indifferent
<200AMP
Full C ost
Suggested Fee
Notes
Subsidy %
$ 129 .22
$
129.00
0%
$ 162.37
$
162.00
0%
$ 81.18
$

81.00 0%
$ 129 .22
$
129.00
0%
$ 32 .57
$

32.00 each additional
2%
$ 81 .18
$
81 .00
0%
$ 129.22
$
129.00
0%
$ 129.22
$
129 .00
0%
$ 162 .37
$
162.00
O%
$ 48 .04
$

48.00 0%
$ 59 .09
$
59 .00
0%
$ 96.08
$
96 .00
0%
$ 129.22
$
129.00
0%
$ 59.09
$
59 .00
0%
$ 96 .08
$

96.00 0%
$ 129.22
$
129 .00
0%
$ 162.37
$
162 .00
0%
$ 36 .99
$
36 .00
3%
$ 96.08
$
96 .00
0%
$ 129 .22
$
129.00
0%
$ 162.37
$
162 .00
0%
$ 243.55
$
243 .00
0%
$ 129.22
$
129 .00
0%
$ 177 .26
$
177 .00
0%
$ 258.44
$
258.00
0%
$ 339 .63
$
339 .00
0%
$ 96.08
$

96.00 0%
$ 129.22
$
129 .00
0%
$ 162.37
$
162 .00
0%
$ 243.55
$
243 .00
0%
$ 96.08
$

96.00 0%
21 Building Fees
k
Type
Subtype
Subtype II
Subtype III
209
225 - 400 AMP
210
450 - 800 AMP
211
1000 - 1600AMP
212
>1600 AMP (combination of ab ove)
213
Receptacles
Indifferent
1 to 5
214
6 to 10
215
11 to 20
216
21 to 40
217
41 to 75
218
76 to 100
219
101 to 150
220
151 to 200
221
201 to 300
222
301 to 400
223
401 to 500
224
501 to 700
225
>700 (combination of ab ov e)
226
Switche s
Indifferent
1 to 5
227
6 to 10
228
11 to 20
229
21 to 40
230
41 to 75
231
76 to 100
232
101 to 150
233
151 to 200
234
201 to 300
235
301 to 400
236
401 to 500
237
501 to 700
238
>700 (combination of above)
239
Lighting
Indifferent
1 to 5
240
6 to 10
241
11 to 20
242
21 to 40
243
41 to 75
244
76 to 100
245
101 to 150
246
151 to 200
247
201 to 300
F ull Cost
Suggested Fee
Notes
Subsidy %
$ 129 .22
$
129.00
0%
$ 162 .37
$
162.00
0%
$ 243.55
$
243.00
0%
$ 48 .04
$
48 .00
0%
$ 81.18
$

81.00 0%
$ 125 .38
$
125 .00
0%
$ 195 .51
$
195 .00
0%
$ 250 .76
$
250.00
0%
$ 294.95
$
294.00
0%
$ 398.23
$
398 .00
0%
$ 495 .56
$
495.00
0%
$ 589.90
$
589.00
0%
$ 737 .38
$
737.00
0%
$ 884 .86
$
884.00
0%
$ 1,032.33
$
1,032.00
0%
$ 48.04
$
48 .00
0%
$ 81.18
$

81.00 0%
$ 125.38
$
125 .00
0%
$ 195.51
$
195 .00
0%
$ 250.76
$
250 .00
0%
$ 294.95
$
294.00
0%
$ 398.23
$
398.00
0%
$ 495 .56
$
495 .00
0%
$ 589 .90
$
589.00
0%
$ 737 .38
$
737.00
0%
$ 884.86
$
884.00
0%
$ 1,032.33
$
1,032.00
0%
$ 48.04
$

48.00 0%
$ 81 .18
$

81.00 0%
$ 125.38
$
125.00
0%
$ 195.51
$
195.00
0%
$ 250.76
$
250.00
0%
$ 294.95
$
294.00
0%
$ 398. 23
$
398.00
0%
$ 495. 56
$
495 .00
0%
$ 589. 90
$
589 .00
0%
22 Building Fees
M
Type
Subtype
Subtype II
Subtype III
248
301 to 400
249
401 to 500
250
501 to 700
251
>700 (combination of above)
252
Motors
r esidential
10 HP (combinati on of above)
257
commercial
100HP (combination of above)
267
Rewire
reside ntial
100 outlets (combination of ab ove)
272
commercial
100 outlets (combination of above)
277
Te mp Po le
1 Pole
278
ea. Add. Pole
279
Plumbing Permit
Repipe
In different
100 fixtures (combination of above )
285
Landscape , Vacuum, breaker
Indifferent
<4
Full C ost
Sugg ested Fe e
N ot es
Subsidy %
$ 737.38
$
737 .00
0%
$ 884.86
$
884.00
0%
$ 1,032 .33
$
1,032 .00
0%
$ 48.04
$
48 .00
O%
$ 81.18
$
81 .00
0%
$ 125 .38
$
]25 .00
0%
$ 195.51
$
195.00
0%
$ 81.18
$

81.00 0%
$ 125.38
$
125 .00
O%
$ 195.51
$
195.00
0%
$ 250 .76
$
250.00
0%
$ 294.95
$
294.00
0%
$ 398 .23
$
398.00
O%
$ 495.56
$
495 .00
0%
$ 589.90
$
589.00
O%
$ 737.38
$
737.00
0%
$ 81 .18
$

81.00 0%
$ 114.33
$
114.00
0%
$ 162.37
$
162.00
0%
$ 228.66
$
228.00
0%
$ 114 .33
$
114.00
O%
$ 147.48
$
147.00
O%
$ 228.66
$
228.00
O%
$ 294 .95
$
294.00
0%
$ 59 .09
$

59.00 0%
$ 48.04
$

48.00 0%
$ 59.09
$

59.00 0%
$ 81.18
$
81 .00
0%
$ 129.22
$
129.00
0%
$ 16237
$
162.00
0%
$ 243.55
$
243 .00
O%
$ 48.04
$

48.00 0%
23 Building Fees
6 Type
S ubtype
Subtype II
Subtype III
286
4 to 8
287
9 or m or e (ea. device)
288
Backflow Device
Indifferent
RPP Valve (ea.)
289
Other
290
Sewer
Indifferent
250 ft (combination of above)
293
Fixtures
Indifferent
100 fixtures (c ombination of above)
299
Gas Piping
Indiff erent
100 gas o utlets (c ombination of above)
305
Water Heater, Replacement
indifferent
306
Water Heater, New
indifferent
307
Water Main Supply
Indifferent
308
Building Permit
Demolition Permits, per structure
309
Building Plan CM, ,
Demolition Permits, per structtlo
310
Buildin g Permit
M iscellaneous Application/Special
Inspe ction/Service not associated
with a permit
311
iiilding Plan Check
Miscellaneous Application/Service
not associated w ith a permit =Plat#
Check
312
Building Permit
Fireworks Stands
313
Building Permit
Carnivals, etc.
314
Buildin g Permit
Single Family Residential Reroof
(Each Structure) >= 200 sq. ft.
315
Buildin g Permit
Multi -Family Reroof (Each Structu re )
316
.n check
Multi -Family Reroof (Each Structural)
Full C ost
Suggested Fee
Not es
Subsidy %
$ 68.02
$
68 .00
0%
$ 19.98
$
19 .00
each additional
5%
$ 88.87
$
88 .00
1%
$ 73 .98
$
73 .00
1%
$ 81.18
$

81.00 0%
$ 162.37
$
162 .00
0%
$ 243.55
$
243.00
0%
$ 81 .18
$
81 .00
0%
$ 114 .33
$
114.00
0%
$ 162 .37
$
162 .00
0%
$ 228 .66
$
228 .00
0%
$ 309 .84
$
309.00
0%
$ 60 .05
$

60.00 0%
$ 84 .55
$
84 .00
1%
$ 120.09
$
120 .00
0%
$ 169 .09
$
169.00
0%
$ 229 .14
$
229 .00
0%
$ 35.55
$
35 .00
2%
$ 51.88
$
51 .00
2%
$ 81.18
$

81.00 0%
$ 207.04
$
207.00
0%
$ 151.50
$
151 .00
0%
$ 236 .83
$
236.00
0%
$ 288.12
$
288 .00
0%
$ 207 .04
$
207 .00
0%
$ 207.04
$
207.00
0%
$ 208.20
$
208.00
0%
$ 360.09
$
360.00
0%
$ 113. 55
$
113.00
0%
24 Building Fees
SS
Type
Subtype
Subtype II
Subtype III
317
Buildin g Permit
Commercial Reroof (Each Structure)
318
:wilding Plan Chec k
Commercial Reroof (Each Structure)
319
Building Permit
Interce ptors/Clarifiers (Pla n Che ck
Required)
320
-r(ng Platt Che ci?
Inte rceptors/Clarifiers - Plan Cheek
321
Building Permit
Spray Boo ths Replacement (Plan
Check Required)
322
heck
apray Booths Replacement- Plan
Che ck
323
Building Permit
Solar PV Systems, Re side ntial
324
xtilsiiir char:.

PV Systems, Residential - Plan
Cheri:
325
Buildin g Permit
Solar PV Systems, Commercial
326
uildinE; Phin Check
Solar PV Systems, Comrnerciai - Plan
Cheek
327
Buildin g Permit
Re sidential Electric Vehicle Charging
Stations
328
.a iiding Plan CheckResidential
Electric Vehicle Charging
Stations
329
Building Permit
Commercial Electric Vehicle
Charging Stations
1 to 3 EVCS
330
Buildin g Plan Check
Co mmercial Electric Vehicle
Charging Stations
1 to 3 EVCS 25kw each space
332
Building Pe rmit
Commercial Electric Vehicle
Charging Stations
4 to 6 EVCS
333
,. (i lea4
Commercial Electric Vehicle
Charging Stations

to 6 EVCS 50kw each space
335
Building Permit
Co mmercial Ele ctric Vehicle
Charging Statio ns
7 to 12 EVCS
336
wildin g Plan Check
Commercial Electric Vehicle
Chargin g Statio ns
7 to 12 EVCS 50kw each space
Full Cost
Suggested Fee
Notes
Subsidy %
$ 360 .09
$
360 .00
0%
$ 113.55
$
113 .00
0%
$ 192 .15
$
192 .00
0%
$ 205.49
$
205.00
0%
$ 192.15
$
192.00
0%
$ 227.11
$
227 .00
0%
$ 192.15
$
192.00
0%
$ 205 .49
$
205.00
0%
$ 379 .98
$
379.00
0%
$ 346 .13
$
346 .00
0%
$ 346 .83
$
346 .00
0%
$ 198 .76
$
198 .00
0%
$ 405 .92
$
405 .00
0%
$ 454 .40
$
454 .00
0%
$ 524 .72
$
524 .00
0%
$ 487.10
$
487 .00
0%
$ 554 .98
$
554 .00
0%
$ 625.30
$
625.00
0%
$ 568.29
$
568.00
0%
$ 725.40
$
725.00
0%
$ 787.18
$
787.00
0%
25 Building Fees
#
Type
Subtype
Subtype II
Subtype III
338
Building Pe rmit
Co mmercial Electric Vehicle
Charging Stations
13 to 18 EVCS
339
L3uildun Pu rr Ow,
Commercial Electric Vehicle
Charging Stations
13 to 18 EVCS 50kw each space
341
Buildin g Permit
Comme rcial Electric Ve hicle
Charging Stations
19 to 26 EVCS
342
Building Plan Check
Commercial Electric Vehicle
Charging Stations
19 to 26 EVCS 50kw each space
344
Building Permit
Commercial Electric Vehicle
Charging Stations
27 to 34 EVCS
345
tzu ild'ine flan Check
Commercial Electric Vehicle
Charging Stations
27 to 34 EVCS 50kw each space
347
Building Permit
Co mmercial Electric Vehicle
Charging Statio ns
)
> 34 EVCS (combi nation of above
348
= !i;din:; Plan Ched,
Co mmercial Electric Vehicle
Charging Stations
> 34 EVCS (combination of above)
349
Building Permit
No n -Habitable Structu re /Space an d
Similar Structures

=500 & =1000 & < 2000 sq. ft.
354
l lin g Plan Che ck
idou -Habitable Structure/Spate
Similar 5tructuret;
s=1000 & <2000 se. ft.
355
Building Permit
Residential Pool/And or Spa
(Includes MEP)
356
ding Flan Check
Residential Poo l/An d or Spa
(Include s MEP) - Plan Check
357
Bu ilding Pe rmit
Commercial Pool/And or Spa
(Includes MEP)
Full C ost
Suggested F ee
Notes
Subsidy %
$ 649.47
$
649.00
0%
$ 810 .62
$
810.00
0%
$ 895.83
$
895.00
0%
$ 767.64
$
767.00
0%
$ 965.77
$
965.00
0%
$ 1,043.87
$
1,043.00
0%
$ 870 .92
$
870.00
0%
$ 1 405 .64
$
1,105 .00
0%
$ 1,182.30
$
1,182.00
0%
$ 413.12
$
450.00
-9 %
$ 275.81
$
275 .00
0%
$ 759.00
$
758.00
0%
$ 1,054.72
$
1,054.00
0%
$ 906.47
$
906.00
0%
$ 1,382 .12
$
1,382 .00
0%
$ 589.90
$
589 .00
0%
$ 538.17
$
538.00
0%
$ 1,017.44
$
1,017.00
0%
26 Building Fees
#
Type
Subtyp e
Subtype II
Subtype III
358
ug Plan Check
Commercial Poo /And or Spa
(Inclu des MEP) - Plan Ch eck
359
Grading Permit
Grading Permits f or Projects
=10,000 & =10,000 & <40,000 sq. ft.
363
Building Plan Che ck
Additional Plan Review per hr. (ove r
3 re vie ws)
1st Hr . Includes Permit Tech time for
processing
364
Building Plan Check
Additional Plan Review per hr. (over
3 reviews)
Hourly Rate after first hour
365
tsiiildin g Plan [heck
Plan Re visions (after permits are
issued)
1st Hr . Includes P ermit Tech time for
processing
366
;:h ci;
Plan Revisio ns (after permits are
issued)
Hourly Rat e after first hour
367
Bu ilding Fees
Additional Inspections per hr./re-
inspection
1st Hr. Includes Permit Tech time for
processing
368
Buildin g Fee s
Permit Issuance Fee
369
Building Fees
Supplemen tal Permit Issua nce Fee
per permit after 1st
Supplemental permits are additi onal
permits issued for the same project and at
the same time the main building permit is
issue d.
370
Building Fees
Inspection Hourly Rate
Hourly Rate after first hour
371
Buildin g Fees
Re -Inspectio n Fee
372
Bu ilding Fees
Admin Fe e
373
Bu ilding Fees
Temp Certificate of Occupancy
374
Fire Plan Check
Residential Fire -Sprinkler
Fire /Building Plan Review
375
Fire Permit
Commercial Fire -Sprinkler
Fire Plan Rev iew
376
Fire Plan Check
Commercial Fire -Sprinkler
Fire Inspection
377
Fire Permit
Commercial Tenant Impro vement
Fire Inspection
378
Fire Plan Check
Residential Multi -Family < 10,000
Sq. ft.

Fire Plan Review
See Note 1
FuII Cost
Suggested Fee
Notes
Subsidy %
$ 742 .70
$
742.00
0%
$ 651.39
$
651.00
0%
$ 1,813 .36
$
1,813.00
0%
$ 1,377.72
$
1,377.00
0%
$ 3,273.16
$
3,273.00
0%
$ 172 .67
$
172.00
0%
$ 151 .06
$
151.00
0%
$ 172 .67
$
172.00
0%
$ 151.06
$
151.00
0%
$ 175.82
$
175.00
0%
$ 49.24
$
49,00
0%
$ 24.50
$
24 .00
2%
$ 132.58
$
132.00
0%
$ 132.58
$
132 .00
0%
$ 198.86
$
198 .00
0%
$ 300.99
$
300.00
0%
$ 865 .38
$
865.00
0%
$ 653.69
$
653.00
0%
$ 567.95
$
567 .00
0%
$ 493.44
$
493.00
0%
$ 1,957.16
$
1,957.00
0%
27 Building Fe es
#
Type
Subtype
Subtype II
Subtype III
379
Fire Permit
Residential Multi -Family 10,000
sq. ft.

Fire Plan Review
See N ot e 1
381
Fire Permit
Residential Multi -Family >1O,000
sq. ft.

Fire Inspection
S ee N ote 1
382
Fire Plan Check
Co mmercial 1D,o0o sq. ft
Fire Plan Review
See Note 1
385
Fire Permit
Comme rcia l >10,000 sq. ft
Fire Inspection
See Note 1
386
State mandated Fire Inspectio n
Multi -Family Residential 3-10 Units
387
State mandated Fire Inspectio n
Multi -Family Residential 11-20
Units
388
State mandated Fire Inspection
Multi -Family Re sidential 21-30
Units
389
State mandated Fire Inspection
Multi -Family Re sidential 31-45
Units
390
State mandated Fire Inspection
Multi -Family Residential >45 Units
>45 Units (Co mbinatio n of Above)
391
State mandated Fire Inspectio n
Assisted Living 1-25 Residents
392
State mandated Fire Inspection
Assisted Living 26-50 Residents
393
State mandate d Fire Inspection
Assisted Living >50 Residen ts
> 50 Residents (Co mbination of Above )
394
State mandate d Fire Inspectio n
Hotel/Motel 1-25 Units
395
State mandated Fire Inspectio n
Hotel/M otel 26 -SO Units
396
Sta te mandated Fire Inspectio n
Multi -Family Residential >45 Units
>5O Units (Combination of Abo ve)
Full Cost
Suggested Fe e
N otes
Subsidy %
$ 733.04
$
733.00
0%
$ 2,808 .68
$
2,808 .00
0%
$ 1,376.74
$
1,376 .00
0%
$ 1,957.16
$
1,957.00
0%
$ 733.04
$
733 .00
0%
$ 2,808.68
$
2,808.00
0%
$ 1,376.74
$
1,376.00
O%
$ 269.39
$
269 .00
0%
$ 404 .09
$
404.00
0%
$ 458.91
$
458.00
0%
$ 553.67
$
553.00
O%
$ 284.28
$
284.00
0%
$ 418.98
$
418.00
0%
$ 359.08
$
359.00
0%
$ 473.80
$
473.00
0%
28 Building Fees
St
Type
Subtype
Subtype II
Subtype III
397
State mandate d Fire Inspection
Rehab/Halfway/State Licens ed
Facility
(Additional fees apply for over 6 hours)
398
State man date d Fire Inspection
Hospital/Clin ic
(Additional fees apply f or over 6 hours)
399
State manda ted Fire Inspe ction
Scho ol
(Additional fees apply for over 6 hours)
400
State man dated Fire Inspection
Hourly Rate
Note s:

Multi -family, mixed -use projects, multi -story (above two floo rs), restaurants, other assembly uses, types of c onstruction 1 other than type V -B, and grading pro jects could increase plan review and inspecti on fees at the applicable hourly rate. 2 Indifferent = Res or Co mm
Full Cost
Sugg ested Fe e
N ot es
Subsidy %
$ 808.17
$
808 .00
0%
$ 808 .17
$
808.00
0%
$ 808.17
$
808.00
0%
$ 119 .80
$
119.00
1%

Appendix D — Full Cost Calculations
The tables below contain the time data used in hours (figures in the green cells, the without $ symbol) to calculate the full cost for each service as listed in Appendix C. The fully burdened hourly rate (figures with the $ symbol) for each position is listed below the position title at the top of each page, and when multiplied by the time data in each row it calculates the full cost. An example of how the calculation is made is below (refer to appendix B for the calculation of bully burdened hourly rates).

Building Fees
Position
Plan - DIRECTOR

OF PLANNING
Willdan-
Building
Official
Senior
Building
Inspector
Willdan -
Permit
Technician
$35350
$178.70
$132.58
$86.47

15.00 35.00

36.00 20.00
Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate Minutes

DIRECTOR OF PLANNING

BUILDING OFFICIAL

SENIOR BUILDING INSPECTOR

PERMIT TECHNICIAN
$353.50
$178.70
$132.58
$86.47

15.00 35.00

36.00 20.00
Full Cost for Service
Cost per
Position
$8838
$104.24
$79.55
$28.82
$300.99
Full Cost
$ 300.99
WW1 LDAN
..M1FX^_.F4 SERVICES
30 Building User Fee Study
-38-

Building Fees
• I regale, I Subtype I Su btype M
1 Buildin g Pe rmit
AD U G roun d up
10000 sqft
25 c,m,r,erctul- N OW CnnallUullin ,
.5003411
26 . ,::,:k
lonurlefliai- Ne w CDmtrucliun
500. 21071)soft
27 - . ,,,oc,N
ion lmcrcial- New Consr nullon
1T,03 200041
28 an 49reak
C.u mlMrcial- NOW CO nslructio i,
1i,0115gf1
29 ,_1,.ii,4 P lan Cne0k
(:onrnercial- New ConsttultlOn
See Note 1
3,151.411000641
30 771171:0 rlancneck
Cmnnrorcial- .New Cvnttruttlo n
See N ote 1
4001-5000 sq0
31 00,120% 114„ Check
Contin vrcial- Now Cannlroctlun
Se e Note1
5001 &0 03 Nrri
32 3,4 Iuiu Han 411226
Commercial- r4eW fm131ri1<tinr,
See No te 1
2005160 0*yh
33 I:we e, Plan CbeuN
Commercial- New COn strccllrn
Se e No te U
7000- oll0At9Oh
34 3ulidin g vii Clock
Co mmercial- New Constru ction
See No te 1
40010- 9008tgli
35 7,410046 Plen (h 6C0
C ommercia l -Ne w Cantiruc tlo r,
See No te 1
91101,10000 sift
36 . ,.,., ,n, cI._,.
tun,mNci„i- New tnn :i nn I i,,,
Se e Note U
019000 suit
37 Buildin g Pe rmit
Residentia l- SFR Ne w Constru ctio n
< 500 SOFT
38 Buildin g Permit
Re sidential- SFR New Construction
500- 1000 Soft
39 Building Pe rmit
Residen tial- SFR New Constru ction
1001-2000 soft
40 Buildin g Permit
Residential- SFR New Construction
2001-3000 sqk
41 Building Permit
Reside ntia l- SFR N ew Con struc tion
See Note
3001-4000 sqh
42 Buildin g Permit
Re siden tia l - 510 N ew Con struction
See No te 1
4001-5000 s qft
43 Building Pe rmit
Re siden tial-5FR New Construction
See No te 0
5001-6000 sqft
44 Building Pe rmit
Residen tia l- SFR New Con structio n
See Note 0
6001-7000 sqft
45 Building Pe rmit
Residential- SFR New Con struction
See Note 1
7001-8000046
Wllldan -
Fire Pla ns
Examiner
Wilkien - Elie
inspector
Ran - DIRECTOR

OF PIANNING
',Widen -
B uilding
Official
Willd an - Civil
E ngineer Plans
Examiner
Wnldan -
Se nior Building
I nspector
Wllidan -
Senior Plans
Examiner
Senior
Permit
Technician
Witldan -
Permit
Technician
Storntweter Water
Permit C omplia nc e
Engine er
Pri ncipal
C onsultant
$14064
$111 . PO
$353 .5 01
Si 79 .7o
$151 06
$112.58
$140.64
$94.e o1
$0647
$116 .68
$166.68
0104
56000
PO 00
lie u W
60001
1,32000
151.
.. .
4 ,1 f?
3, PO
. silk
510.
4500
1000
7-x00
t 1300

30.001
360 .00
4600
0 00 .0 0

10.00 1,260 .00
20 0,1
24000
ft 00
30,00

45.00 540.00
100 00

45.00 00 01
720.00
100 no
30 540
45 1200
60 1500
90 1000
120
2160
100
2640
100
3100
200i
30(81
210
0640
220
4000
240
4200
480
6480
15 480
170
15 660
90 30
40 900
11 0
10 55
1100
GO
llfl
10 70
1000
90 110
10 90
10119
170
130
10 170
1160
1'A
1411
15 150
2460
18U
150
IS
182
2010
190
160
15 1
200
4060
100
170
20 100
3961
180
150
15 010
5160
400
200
30 15
900
25 1320
15 1560
45 2160
60 2520
75 3000
90 3480
150
3900
120
4300
Full Cost
Suggested fee
N otes
S ubsidy %
5 1,54718
$ 1,547 .00
0%
$ 2,300 us
5 2,3uo.On
O%
$ 3.095 sS
5 3,095.00
0%
$ 1 ,18750
5 1,187 .00
0%
0 1 ,63546
$ 1 .635 .00
0%
$ 2,286.33
$ 2,286 00
0%
$ 884.86
$ 884.00
0%
$ 2,122.79
5 2,122.00
0%
$ 2,933.19
5 2,933.00
0%
$ 751.83
$ 75100
0%
$ 1,612.51
$ 1,612.00
0%
$ 2,145.69
5 2,14500
0%
$ 1,945.53
$ 1,94500
0%
$ 2,785.71
5 2,785.00
0%
$ 3,493.31
$ 3,4 93.00
0%
$ 4,245.58
$ 4 ,145.00
0%
$ 5,130 .43
$ 5,130.00
0%
$ 6,280 .46
5 6,280 .00
0%
$ 7,563.06
$ 7,56 100
0%
5 8,550 .72
5 8 .550.00
0%
$ 9,110 .84
$ 9,11000
0%
$ 9,670 .96
$ 9.67 000
0%
$ 9,995 .70
$ 9 ,99 500
0%
$ 15,748 .70
$ 15 ,748.00

DEPOSIT
0%
$ 1,342 .73
5 1 ,342,00
0%
$ 1,811 ,72
5 1,51100
0%
$ 2,406 .46
$ 2,406.00
0%
$ 3,519 .66
$ 3 ,519 .00
0%
$ 4,406.27
$ 4,406 .00
0%
$ 5,307.78
$ 5,307.00
0%
$ 6,397 .33
$ 6 ,397.00
0%
$ 7,328 .61
$ 7,32 600
0%
$ 8,364.08
5 8,36400
0%
$ 9,074.85
5 9 ,074 870
0%
$ 9,747.23
5 9,747 .00
0%
$ 15,017 .06
$ 15,017.00

DEPOSIT
0%
0 2,033.44
$ 2 ,03100
0%
$ 2,991 .31
5 7,991.00
0%
$ 3,551.43
$ 3 ,551.00
0%
$ 4,907.06
$ 4,907.00
0%
$ 5,747 .24
$ 5,747.00
0%
$ 6,852.59
5 6,852.00
0%
$ 7,957 .93
5 7,957 .00
0%
$ 9,064.72
5 9,064.00
0%
$ 10,036.05
5 10,036 .00
0%
31 Building Fees
T"P.
k aolin
Subtype MI
46 Bu ilding Pe rmit
Resldentlal- SFR N ew Construction
See Nat al
6001-9000 sgft
47 Building Pe rmit
Residential- SFR Ne w Construction
See Note
9001-10000 sift
48 Building Pe rmit
Resldentlal- SFR New Construction
See No te
>10000 sgft
49 ,-,. cn.-l.

Residential- SFR New Construction
>5005(111
SO
,..,,,, ,n Ci,- . _,:

Re sidentia l- SFR New Construction
500. 1000 sok
51 o.. .,..,a ri-,n ii.,,-.

Re siden tial- SFR Ne w Construction
1001- 2(010 s oft
52 ,uil31oo ,cln rl ti,u.1:

Re siden tial- SFR New Construction
2001. 3000 soft
53 .i,.ildioio Pia n Che,h
Re siden tial - SFR Ne w Construction
See No te l
3001-4000 sgh
54 0, “1,,Flali%hair.

Re siden tia l- SFR Ne w Construction
Se e No te
4001.500 sift
55 .'. '.. :., ':,-.-..

Residen tial - SFR New Construction
Se e No te l
5001. 60141 tilt
56 ." ... :. . lla,I Choi.

Re siden tial -SFR Ne w Construction
See Notes
003-7000 sgft
57 , ,. i. a .n cn>i.

Residen tial - SFR New Co nstruction
See Na te
1001-8000 soh
58 . i. :Art.,:;; 1- Io„,i._c::

Residential-SFR New Construction
See No te
800' 1-9000sgtt
59 ...: ,.. ,.I:-, ,.. :. .,
Residential - SFR New Construction
See Note
9001.10000 sgh
60 -. .. . 'in,, COo's
Residential- SFR New Co nstruction
See Note
:1000 son
61 Bu ildin g Permit
Residential -A ddition
2000 sgft
65 .. ,I. ,ncn,., ,.

Residential -Addition
)
Residential - Addition
101.2000 xis
68 ,, ,,i3h,g PL,, ,.h,:,l:

Residential - Additio n
Se e No te1
> 2W0soft
69 Building Permit
Residential - Remodel
200 sqft
73 . :.. :. .. .: ... 100 soh
77 Buildin g Permit
Residen tial -Mu lti -Family Ne w
Construction /Addition
<500 SOFT
78 Buddin g PermitResldentlal
-Muitl-Fa mily N ew
Co nstru ction /Addition
50-1000 sgft
79 Buildin g Permit
Residential • Mu lti -Fa mily N ew
Construc tion/Addition -
1001- 2000 sqH
80 Building Pe rmitRe slde ntla l
- Multi -Family New
Constru ction/Addition
2001-300 sqH
81 ealldInL Pe rmit
Re sldentlal-Mu Hl-Family Ne w
Co ns truc tion/Addition
See Note 1
3001-400 sgft
82 Buildin g Permit
Residential- Multi -Fa mily New
Construc tion /Addition
See Note 1
41301-5000 sqH
Willdan•
Pim Plans
E xamin er
Wllden - Fine
I nsp ect or
Pla n - DIRECTOR

OF PLANNING
Willdan•
B uilding
Official
Walden -ChM
E ngi neer Plant
Examin er
Wlllde •
$ enlor Building
I nspect or
Walden-
Senior Plant
Examin er
Seni or
Permit
T echnician
WIRda n•
►e nn%
Technici an
Stere,water Water
Permit Compliance
Engineer
Pdndpal
Co ns ultant
$140.14
$119.40
5357 .80
5178.70
$181.06
$132 .5a
$140.14
SM.0O
$44.47
$184 .11
SUM AS
260
4860
30 5340
360
6000
10 480
90 15
770
90 10
30 960
90 10
40 1320
60 90
10 50
1560
90 10
15 60
2160
90 110
15 70
2520
170
120
15 80
300
120
130
20 100
3450
180
140
20 170
3900
180
150
20 1S0
490
200
160
30 180
5400
240
160
30 15 00
540
2000
780
300
1320
45 0
1680
10 .0
470
1200
15 .0
540
120.0

20.0 560
150.0

25.0 1320
10000
200
240
200
540
300
1080

45.0 150

10. 00
180
000

20. 00
300
14000

30. 0
60 160.00

40.0 1000
1600
34 1200
40 150
60 240
80 2940
100
3120
120
3300
Full Cat
Suggested Fee
N otes
S ubsidy%
$ 11,513.69
5 11 ,51100
0%
$ 12,693.50
5 12 ,693 .00
0%
$ 14,330.62
$ 14 .330.00

DEPOSIT
0%
$ 1,204.60
$ 1 .284 .00
0%
$ 1,893.75
$ 1 ,893.00
0%
$ 2,500.99
$ 2,50000
0%
$ 3,744 .43
$ 3,74400
0%
$ 4,472 .30
$ 4,47700
0%
$ 6,028.99
0 6,02800
0%
$ 7,051,77
$ 7 ,05100
0%
$ 8,313.54
$ 8,313.00
0%
$ 9,738.54
$ 9,736 .00
0%
$ 10,871.84
5 10 ,871.00
0%
$ 13,304.67
5 13,304 .00
0%
$ 15 ,031.01
$ 15 ,031.00

DEPOSIT
0%
$ 1 ,237.93
$ 1,737.00
0%
$ 1,783,16
$ 1.783.00
0%
$ 3,006.20
$ 3.006.0
0%
$ 3,046.30
$ 3,8460

DEPOSIT
0%
$ 1,187 .19
$ 1,187 .0
0%
$ 1,483.36
$ 1,483.0
0%
$ 2,525 .96
$ 7 ,515.0
0%
$ 3,427 .93
$ 3,427.0
DEP 05IT
0%
$ 589.90
$ 589.0
0%
$ 1,252 .82
$ 1,252.0
0%
$ 2,475 .87
$ 2,47 50
0%
$ 3,448 .63
$ 3,448.0

DEP OSIT
0%
$ 581.40
$ 581.0
0%
$ 964.52
$ 964.0
0%
$ 1,726.32
$ 1,726.0
0%
$ 2,910,04
$ 1.910.0

DEPOSIT
0%
$ 2,741.03
$ 2,741.0
0%
$ 4,096.66
$ 4,09600
0%
$ 5,482.07
$ 5,481.0
0%
$ 6,734 .89
5 6,734.00
0%
$ 7,192.21
$ 7,19200
0%
$ 7,649.53
5 7.649.0
0%
32 Buildin g Fees
0 Ty{te
L dr4Tpe
SuM3r @ It
.. .r. . .
83 Bu ilding Permit
Reiidential-Mu ki-Family New
Construction /Addition
S ee No41
5001-60 00 soft
84 Bu ildin g Permit
Re siden tial -Multi -Family New
Construction/Addition
See N ot e1
6001 .7000 soft
85 Bu ildin g Permit
Resldentlal - Mu lti -Family Ne w
Construc tion/Addition
See Note 1
7001-8000 soft
86 Buildin g Permit
Residential •MultI-Family New
Co nstruction/Additio n
See Nate1
8001-9000 soft
87 Bu ilding Permit
Reside ntial - Multi -Family New
Construc tion/A ddition
See N otes
9001-10000 soft
88 Bu ilding Permit
Re slda nWl- Muhl -family New
Con struction /A ddition
See Note 1
$10000 soft
89 lolidilk Pi, chat,.
-'r :iu,fL:M1at nav
• ..,•• n .wl/A delmm
,564150"r3"
90 ,.oilni,ik Ain Ci,eni:
- r,rzimi NlObifaln W r1;•00
_I2. 04020 0
91 Tulldtn6 elan Chock,. ,.
_ ,u.,i-MWtl family Nor.

OrmiroidlOrm

1. 001- X000.30
92 1.2 Plan ChecK
" " 'ul- Muhl Ean ufv N.%
2001-300 140
93 -. I'len 11,000
• '.fetal. Mati1i anal IV,
Sea NoneS
4001.400 0 P11F
94 Ghee[,:,,,,
an Ghee[
/Mu 14F ty II,''''
Io nlAddAo
See Note 1
.11101- `;11106 A
95 . ,,n Plan cr.ecg
u1�ig
-„lul- n t.ihi te nk'ry' N:'w
.. ,..,, ,KN I/fiM1n10„
See No te1
.00061410 i4i
96 ulidi„g Vlun11001,0 11E10,„ ,„ ,•,,,,,(0013.00:141.1IoBe,1 . ,nul • 0,20 in/ N;:;•
See Note
11001,0 11E10, co II
97 .;,11,10 M on (Ilea
.-,ua ,• M,.100m,ddyrve%
,. .''. `",,, ,,./.03,00 0
See Note 1
703i- 900ji Sou
98 .• :r N an CJlec6
�..n lFml. Mold Ym mPy11.1.+
-,,.. u n/411mn on
Sae N ote
8909.51100 Silk
99 Buliding Plan Clr.. k
• -. mil. PA 017.1.711.0411,1
SoN a.

I-!0EM1 iql.
100
„o 16 Plaii Ca,oc6

See Nowt
?yII
101
Buildin g Pe rmit
Co mmercial -Tenant Improvement
10000 soft
113
-...

Co mmercial- Tenant Impro vemen t
-. 5110 SOFI
114
, ,,,.c8
Commercial- Tenant Improvement
500-1000 500.
115
rian tl,..c1,
Co mmerc ial- T enan t Improve men t
1001-2000 835
Willdan-
flee Pla ns
Examiner
Willdan - flee
Inspector
Plan -DIRECTOR
Of PLANNING
WO Man-
B uilding
Official
Willdan - Civil
Engi neer Plans
Examiner
Willda n-
Sen or Suedlog
Inspector
Willdan-
Senior Plans
Examiner
Seni or
Permit
Technician
Willdan-
Permit
Technician
St ormwater Water
Permit Compliance
Engineer
Principal
Consultant
$140 .64
5110 .110
5355501
$17070
5151.06
$132 .50
4140.64
$5100
564 .47
$166.61
$166.16
110
3540
160
300
no
3930
250
4000
300
4200
360
49110
15 .10
020
120
20 GO
1080
,0
30 90
137O
00 40
1/40
45 9O
50 7470
60 90
60 750
25 911
641
1111'1
90 170
101
31$,(1
105
170
120
3150
100
120
150
01W
115
120
18u
3410
110
tail
240
4800
240
150
10 720
15 101 0
201
1500
30 1100
45 2100
45 7400
120
2760
170
3000
150
3240
150
3460
150
3610
250
4100
'40
FWI C ost
Suggested fee
N otes
S ubsidy%
$ 8,239.44
5 5,219 .00
0%
$ 8,756.32
$ 5,706 .00
0%
$ 9 ,339,50
5 9,12900
0%
$ 9,627.73
5 9,627 .00
0%
$ 10,174.40
$ 10,174.00
0%
$ 12,076.69
$ 12,07600

DEP OSIT
0%
$ 1,980.81
5 1,960.00
0%
$ 2,889 .13
$ 1,589.00
0%
$ 3,556.99
5 3,556 .00
0%
$ 4,752.26
$ 4,752.00
0%
$ 6,277.42
$ 6,277.00
0%
$ 7,047.30
5 7,04700
0%
$ 7,644.19
5 7,64400
0%
$ 0,292.80
5 8,192.110
0%
$ 8,817 .25
$ 5,517.00
0%
$ 9,220.44
$ 9,270.00
0%
$ 9,623.62
0 9,621.00
0%
$ 13,606 .91
$ 13,606.00

DEPOSIT
0%
$ 1,620.79
$ 1,62000
0%
$ 2,431 .19
5 l 431.
0%
$ 3,374.17
5 3.324.00
0%
$ 4 ,066 .88
$ 4,066 00
0%
$ 4,774.47
5 4,774.00
0%
$ 5,437 .39
$ 5,437.00
0%
$ 6,456.27
5 6,456 .00
0%
$ 6,986.61
5 6,986.00
0%
$ 7,606.30
$ 7,606.00
0%
$ 8,092.44
5 8,092 .00
0%
$ 8,578 .58
5 8,578.00
0%
$ 10,025 .48
$ 10,07500

DEPOSIT
0%
$ 1 ,468.47
5 5,460.00
0%
$ 1,879 .34
$ 1,579.00
0%
$ 2,567.65
5 7,567.00
0%
33 Building Fees
016
0000 ,. . _.. :...,-.

Commerc ial -Tenan t improve me nt
10(11-3004>oft
117
00,0. ., �.. .:.

Co mme rcial- Tenant impro ve men t
See Nate
3001-4000 301,
118
_. .. .. 000. _ .

Co mm ercial- Te nant impro vemen t
Se e No te 1
4001.5000 sari
119
o,.I.. :,,,a ',Ian Cn..:

Co mme rcial- Tenant impro vemen t
See No te 1
6001,6000c4ft
120
_ li dInn 7l4n (h.:,.

Comme rcial- Tenant Improveme nt
Se e Note 1
6001.7000 toff
121
u ,u ld:n4 Mon Cha.a
Commercial - Tenant improveme nt
See No te l
/001.80041
122
,. unuln s pla :, cn-a.

Comme rcial- Ten an t improvemen t
See Note l
8001.9000 iiti
Co mme rcial- Te nant impro vemen t
See Note 1
7801' 100011 soul
124
�.. .. .. :: :.:... . c.

Co mme rcial- Te nant impro vement
See Note 1
6100(X7 soft
125
.,.A, s, ..:,cl,O:s
Basic Building Permits (Windo w
Chan ge Outs, Bloc k W alla,
stuc co/Siding or oilier sindlar
activity as determine d 00 BidOff 0r
his/her d.iir,,00)- Han Check
Hll6 dy Bata. MIA. 1/2 now
126
tallding Permit
Basic Bu ilding Permits (Blo ck Walls,
Stucco /Siding or o the r simila r
activity as determined by BIdOff or
his/he r design ee )
127
.,.,,n -.,:,._.,.

Fbu mGing Plan (h ock O nly
Hat hot, ',Oil tai' Olen bunt Nine
120
,.,-., ,c.lcll Ma c' ,,,. -
Mc.tdnlcel Ilan Check Only
Pilot Had, Full CAM 4hc u Ho urfy Hale
129
,,. =1 r ,en ,neck
ele ctrical Plan [back On ly
(brat Hour full Coat (hen Hnth iy Fain
130
Building Permit
Signage
Building Sign
131
Free standing Sign
132
Sign Circuit
133
Add'nl Circuits (ea)
134
Windows/Doors
Indifferent
Ito 10
135
11 to 25
136
26 to 50
137
51 to 100
138
10100 175
139
175 to 250
140
>250 (combina tion of above )
141
Mechanical Pe rmit

HVAC/FAU
re side ntial
10,000 CFM (combination of abo ve)
153
Condenser/Compresso r
re siden tial
>1HP
154
1HP-3HP
155
4HP-7HP
Wlllda n-
Fire Plans
Exami ner
Wllldan • Fin
I nspector
Plan- O4RECT011

OF PLANNING
Willdan-
Building
Official
Wllldan •Civil
Engineer Plans
Examiner
Wllldan•
Se nior Building
Inspector
Willdan•
S enior Flans
Exami ner
Senior
Permit
Technician
Wllldan•
Permit
Technicia n
Stormwater Wat er
Permit Compliance
Engine er
Principal
C ons ultant
4140 .44
$119.10
6363.550
4170.70
$101.04
$133.66
5140.05
$91 .00
966.47
$166.00
5168.61
.fg,
I,II 14
2411
1„n
1f
I'
,1 %
5 30
10 60
30 5
10 5
20 5
00 10
as
15 6u
18 90
20 120
10 5
30 lU
45 10
30 10
45 15
60 5
10 5
30 10
45 5
15 5
20 10
30 Foil C ost
Suggested Fee
Notes
Subsidy %
$ 3 ,096 .01
$ 3 ,096.00
0%
$ 3,951 .40
$ 3,951.00
0%
$ 4,283.30
5 4,783 .00
0%
$ 5,106.94
$ 5,106 .00
0%
$ 6 ,072.85
$ 6,072 .00
0%
$ 6 ,551.73
5 6 ,551.00
0%
$ 6,960 .29
$ 6,960 .00
0%
$ 7,492.40
$ 7 ,492.00
0%
$ 8 ,422 .49
5 8 .412 .00

DEPOSIT
0%
plus
$ 109 .71
5 109 .00
$82/additional
1%
1/2 hr
$ 309 .84
$ 3 09 .00
0%
Pius
$ 183.87
$ 183.00
5162/ additi onal
0%
1 hr
plus
$ 240 .41
5 240 .00
$162/additio nal
1 hr
0%
plus
$ 240.41
5 240 .00
51 62/additi onal
0%
1 hr
$ 81.18
5 8100
0%
$ 162 .37
$ 162 .00
0%
$ 81 .18
$ 81.00
0%
$ 36.99
$ 36.00
3%
$ 59.09
f 59. 00
0%
$ 81.18
5 81 .00
0%
$ 129.22
$ 129.00
0%
$ 177.26
$ 17700
0%
$ 252.49
$ 252 .00
0%
$ 324 ,74
$ 324.00
0%
$ 59 .09
5 59 .00
0%
$ 81.18
0 81.00
0%
$ 129 .22
$ 129 00
0%
$ 96.08
$ 96 00
0%
$ 129.22
$ 129.0 0
0%
$ 177.26
5 170,00
0%
$ 59.09
$ 59 .00
0%
$ 81,18
$ 81.00
0%
$ 129,22
5 129.00
0%
$ 48.04
5 4800
0%
$ 59.09
5 59.00
0%
$ 96.08
$ 96.00
0%
34 Building Fees
Si*type SI
PallEIII;E:acimi
'
15]
-
>10 HP (c ombination of ab ove)
ECM
I=11IIIil
EMI
OCIEEMMMIMIll
1616®-_
-
>10 HP (combinati on of abov e)
MI
CEII=Ill=IMIIIIEIEIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
MIN-
20, 100 FT
165
-
>100 FT (combination of above)
MI
II=IIIIIEEMIIIII
-
20-100 FT
168
> 100 FT (combinati on of abo ve)
OM
Hoo d
gMMMEGIIIMIIIMIll
MI

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
®
250,-1000 CFM
-
1000 - 2000 CFM
17®> 2000
CFM (combinatio n of above)
ISM
0ZEIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
1]]
11 or mo re (ea)
OM
GM
. INIMIll
IMMIECIIIELI0
MN
MN
0=0110741=MNIIIMMILIMINIIIIIII

IMMIEDI

OISMIIIIIIIIIIIMI
OM
QM
M

---> 10
t=inmemmui
186
HP (combin ation of above)
an
1BM
CI0E CIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIM
LIII=MIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
MILIOCiIMIIII
Ins
II=
I=MEIZEICINIIIIIIMI
1®----®> 10
HP (combin ation of above )
MI
®
450! 800 AMP
EZIII
1000-1600AM P
197
-
>1600 A MP (combination of abo ve)
0 200 AM P
F-450-
800 AM P
MEM1000-1600AMP
202

MEMIIIIIIIMIMMEMINIST=IIIIIIIIIIIIME
> 1600 A MP (co mbination of abo ve)
BM
CM
CM

EEIMMCMINIIIIIMIIIIIMII
450,800 AMP
O
1000-1600AMP
207
-----
> 1600 AMP (co mbinatio n of abov e)
QM
0200 AMP
M

MIMIIIIMIIMMI
B
®
450-800 AMP
-
1000-1600AM P
212
> 1600 AM P (combination of above)
EIM

IIMMIIIIMMIIIIM
. . r
-
®
Wi' Wa n -
Fire Pl ans
Fu ndner
Willdan- fke
I nspect or
Plan - DIRECTOR
Of PLANNING
Willda n -
euilding
Official
Willdan-Ci vil
E ngineer Pla ns
Exami ner
Willda n -
S eni or Buildi ng
I nspect or
Willda n-
S eni or Nans
Evam' ner
Senior
Permit
Techn kan
Willdan-
Permit
Technician
Stormwatec Water
Permit Complia nce
Engin eer
Principal
C ons ultant

IIMINIIIMEIIIIIIME
NNEES2
Sill.f2
IIIIIM
®
MI=
$164 fig
IIIIME
EMI
__-_---_
----_--
IM2
MIME=
--
II:

IIIIIIIIIIIICE
---
MEI
MEMO
�MEM

MIMEMECI
EMMI:
113
---MIMI
-----
-_-_-N_-_®__--_-_-_
MI NIM

IIIIIIIIIIM
--------
-___-_
5_
a___--__
---
---
IMMO
-MN=
MI=
-----

IIIIIIIIIIIM

INIIIIIIIIIIIIII
MINIM
=ME
MEMO
I
IIiIII
® IMMO
-----
1 ---IMMO,
--------
IMMUNE
N INE
_-
MIME
60 MN=
_
90--
-_
MN=--MEM____-_-_-_
=IMO
-----
_---
--
---®_
---
I
170 MIMI
-_�MEMO
I---
_-
ME OW
1'
I9-©---
30 -©---�-
45 --
--------
MINIM
IA
D
ME M
MEM
--©
-MEM_IMMIE
®
-©-©-----
35 Full C ost
Sugg est ed Fee
Notes
S ubsidy %
_-
---Mil
IONIMIZIII MINICEI-0
MINIM=
__
$ 96 .08
EiMI3IIIIIIIIMMI
-
$ 129.22
MIMED=-
0%
��-
0%
IIII=MIC==IIIM
MINIM
-
IIIMIM
--_-
$ 96.08® '."-IMMEM
___
®'
0%
MIMI
5 9600
-
0%
IHNEECEOWIni
'ME=
MEM
ItEECI-IIIIIIMI
EMEE®"
-0
$ 32.57
$ 37.00
ex 6 addm onal
IWIE NNIMM313
MIEN
FINNISZE_�_-�_
IIMEOESIMIIIIIIIIII=-MONS

BIIIIICEMINIIIINNICI
ME=
IMIIIIIFINIMIllIE0ZI-
E110:1IOIMI:123
MIME
$ 129 .22
IIIIIIIIIIIICEI-M0EN_
®IIIIIIIINIIMEIIMEM
-

CINIIIICMIIIIIIIIIMIOI-NUMMI
0%
IMM®"
0%
�
E
-__
IIIIIIIIIIII=1--UM=_
ONE=
®-MEM
BEM

IIM EZI
KUM MER:IIIIIIEMI
-
MEM=-
E=MEED

MINIMUM'-
0%
FIIIIMIIIIIIIM_IMO=
E=IIIIEUNIIIIIIIIIEIZI-
0%

IIIIIILEICIIIIIII
0%
MEM
_--_
FINIIIIIIIII=_MEM
$ 96.08
$ 129.22
f0
B _.6-a '.. ,
MGM
$ 162.37
®
�
EMIIMMICIIIIIIKOCI-__
----
$ 48.04

IMMINIMMIMILEM
-
$ 01.18

FRIMMIIIMI

FIIINEMEIIMIIIIIIIEICEI-
.A
w

Building Fees
Type
Su btype
S ubtype N
Mil

INIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIOEEJIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIII EOM
EEIZE
Ma l-
76t o1OO
Oral-
1O1 to 15O
EM Ill-
151 to 2OO
®
I®
2O1 to 3OO
-
301 to 4OO
®
-
4010 0 5OO
O
-
5O1 to 7OO
225
>7OO (combination of ab ove)
ECM
®

CIIIIIIIINIECM
lerilaIll
QM

EBECOIIIIIII
FM

EZEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIN
®
-
76 to 1OO
®
1O1 to 15O
®
151 to 2OO
®
I®
-
2O1 to 3OO
-
3O1 to 4OO
Ma
4O1 to 5OO
®
5O1 to 7OO
238
IMMIIIIIIIIIE1712132211111=111111111
>7OO (co mbination of above)
EN

EIZEINIIIII
EIIM
CM

MEM-BIEMIMINIIIIII

EIZEINIIIIIIIIIMI
EZEI
Di
CM
-
76 to 1OO
1O1 to 15O
151 to 2OO
Mil
-
2O1 to 3OO
3O1 to 4OO
Mill
4O1 to 5OO
MIIM
5O1 to 7OO
251

IMIMMIIIIIIIMME INIMME MIIIIIIMINIIIIIIIII
-
>7OO (co mbination of abo ve)
!MI

ERIN-M IZEIIIIIIIMM
256
-
>10 HP (combinatio n of above)
-2131111
r IIIIIIIIME
EMI
MEM
�_
-_
-
r '.

EMIIIIIIIIIIMI
earx
MEM
EMI
EIN-
510P-100HP
266
-
>1OOHP (co mbination of above)
ECM

MEENIIIIIIIIMEMICII
r.
®
r321.11111
n=allillillIM
FM
Ell
51-1OO Outlets
271
-.-.®
> 1OO outlets )co mbinatio n of above )
EOM

EEIIMMIINIII
1=1211.1111
EMI
®
51-1OO Outlets
276
>1OO outlets (combination of abo ve)
EMI
EMI
Temp Pole
e a. Add. Po le
Willda n-
Fire Plans
Examiner
Willdan - Flee
Inspect or
Plan DIRECTOR
Of PL ANNI NG
W,Ildan-
b ulldin$
Official
W,Ilda n - Civli
Fnelneer Flans
Fe min e,'
Wdida n-
S enl 0r Rulldi nS
Ins• for
Willdan
Seni or Plans
Fe a
S en or
Permit
T echnician
Willdan-
Permit
Technlola n
St ormw4ter Water
Permit C ompliance
In Int er
Principal
Con su liar t
$14014

INEMIIIIIMMIIIIBM
$111 .00
5172.14
$140.14
IME M
gg .47
$166.14
5114.14
---®MOM
-®--_--
III21
---MINIM
'MEMO�®-----
MINIM
MIMED
_--MINIU M-©--
--_
MINCI
NM=
---©-
15 -----
---©-®-----
MINIM
-_-_IIIIIIIIIIILL_-_MINIM
-_-_-_-_-_
IMMO
---IIIIIIIIIIIIIED-I
---®-®MIME
MES
-----
---®-©__---
-
©
®C MIIIIMICELIMI=
©
MIME
nt]
111113
©��
50-----
��
-----
-----
-
_------�_-_
-_
5-
---
MOM
MUM
--IIIMI NME-®---_-
-_=ME
10 -
-®MIME
75 =I=33
MIN
---©-MUM
--IIIIIIII2-MIME
lit
II=MIEEI
---__--
-©-----
INIMM321
=ME=

IIIIIIII

IIIIIMINIM

MIIIIIIIIIIM
MINIM
___-
5 EMI
--_ill
MINIM
©C©��

IIIIIECI

IIIIMIIIIC
-----
NMI
-
---
MIMEO
IIII

1.11321
_--=MC
_--
_----_-_--_
---
IIIIIIIM63
Mill
-----
_----
24O
-MUM
3(1O
-
MIME
MIIIM:1
©
-----
5 —
to'
- Itt
-
1O-
12O
F all C ost
Suggested Fee
Notes
Subsidy %
$ 195.51
$ 250.76
$ 294.95
$ 398.23
$ 495.56
$ 589.90
$ 737.38
$ 884 .86
$ 1,032 .33
19500
O%
o%
O%
O%
O%
0%
O%
0%
O%
5 250.00
194.00
398 OO
$ 495,00
589.00
$ 738.00
884 CO
$ 1,031.00
$ 48.04
48OO

81.00 125.00
195.00
15 0010
294.00
O%
O%
O%
0%
0%
O%
O%
O%
O%
O%
O%
O%
81 .18
$ 125.38
$ 195 .51
$ 250.76
$ 294 .95
$ 398.23
5 495.56
$ 589.90
$ 737.38
5 884.86
$ 1 ,032.33
$ 398OO
495OO
5890 0
737.00
884.14
1,03200
4804

81.18 48OO
O%
O%
O%
O%
O%
O%
O%
O%
O%
O%
O%
0%
5 81 W
$ 125OO
$ 125.38
$ 195.51
$ 250.76
$ 294.95
$ 398.23
$ 495.56
$ 589.90
$ 737 .38
$ 884 .86
$ 1,032 .33
195OO
75OOO
294 .14
398.00
495.0 0
$
$ 589 CO
131 .00
884 OO

1.03214

48.04 81.18
4000
81 .14
11500
195 00
O%
O%
O%
O%
5 125 .38
$ 195.51
5 11.00
$
O%
0%
O%
O%
O%
O%
O%
O%
O%
5 125 .38
$ 195 .51
$ 250 .76
$ 294.95
$ 398.23
$ 495 .56
$ 589.90
$ 737.38
115OO
195.00
15000
194.00
398OO
495.00
58914
$
$ 137.00
$
$ 114 .33
$ 162 .37
$ 228.66

81.18 $
81 .00
114OO
O%
O%
O%
0%
5 162OO
5 218OO
$ 114.33
$ 147 .48
$ 228.66
$ 294 .95
$ 11400
O%
O%
O%
O%
14/OO
228.00
194 .00
$ 59.09

48.04 59.00
4800
O%
O%

Building Fees
N
Type
swine.
s wims.. N
gtaNVp NI
279
Plumbing Pe rmit
Repipe
Indifferent
250 ft (c ombinatio n of abov e)
293
Fixtures
Indifferent
100 gas outlets (co mbinatio n of above)
305
Wa ter Hea te r, Replace ment
indiffe ren t
306
Water Hea te r, New
Indiffe re nt
307
Water Main Su pply
Indifferent
308
Building Permit
Demolition Permits, per structure
309
«.. uwn d Pee) w,c ck
u ution Pe nults, pa r.:. i,tl, ,.
310
Building Pe rmit
Miscellaneous Application/Spe cial
n spection/Se rvice not assoc iated
with a permit
311
ac llding Ilan (F. ,- ,
Miscellanrous Applicatiun/Sc,vn-
BOI 4444.4 ill44 with a permit - P1 ..
312
Budding Permit
Fire works Stands
313
Building Permit
Ca rniv als, etc.
314
Building Permit
Single Family Re siden tia l Reroof
(Ea ch Structure) 0= 200 sq. ft.
315
Bu ilding Permit
M ulti -Family Reroof (Each
StruClure)
316
,214144 Plan 40 010
,1c.o. nllOa (loc i, ey rse r
317
Budding Pernik
Commercial Recent (Each Structure)
318
319
Budding PermitInterce ptors/Clarifiers
(Plan Check
Required)
320
p pitaplg Pon c.ba:l,
In terceptors/C.1.'1le rs- Plan Ch eck
321
Bu ildin g PermitSpray
Booths Re placement (Plan
Check Require d)
322
_, R
>Y rCourt 11, 1,11=olr,,.nr I. - 1.p ,
(he:k
323
Building Permit
So lar PV 5y5tems, Residential
So lar ESstron .
325
Building Permit
So lar PV Systems, Commercial
376
..,
solar PO Sya1.1n1. C,.,nin,r.i,. li.,.

Check
Willda n -
Fir e Pla ns
Examin er
Willdan - Fire
I nspect or
Plan - Di RECT OR
or PIAN NING
Willdan -
Buildi ng
Official
Willda n - Civil
E ngi neer Plans
E xaminer
Willda n-
Senior Building
Inspect or
Willdan -
Seni or Plans
Exami ner
Se nior
Permit
Tech ni ci an
Willdan-
Permll
Technician
St urrnwater Water
Permit Complia nce
E ngi ne er
Principal
Cons ultant
514041
5551 .10
5353 SO,
5178.70
$161.06
$112.58
$110.64
III CO
188.47
$166.sg
5166.61
S
20 5
30 10
45 10
60 15
90 5
IS
8 2U
l
5 15
20 10
20 S
10 10
W
15 90
5 30
5 45
10 60
10 90
15 120
5 30
5 45
10 by
10 90
IS
110
5 IS
5 25
S
30 25.01
NOW

20.00 39,011
15 0)
66 .00
6000

35.60 e0.0
'n IW

26.00 60 W

26.00 6000
1s 00
74 00
2000
1360 0

30.00 3000
moo
138.0
3900
3000

20.00 moo

60.0 .1
45 .00
moo

60.00 6000
60 00
20 0
6000
coo,'
4500

10.00r
145. 00
120 00

45.0 Full Cost
S ugg est ed f en
Not es
Subsidy %
$ 5`310
$ 5000
0%
$ 81 .18
$ 61 .00
0%
$ 129 .22
$ 129.00
0%
$ 162.37
5 162.00
0%
$ 243.55
5 243.00
0%
$ 48.04
$ 48 .00
0%
$ 68.02
$ 68.00
0%
$ 19 .98
8 1900
each additional
5%
$ 88.87
$ 86 00
1%
$ 73.98
5 /3.00
1%
$ 81.18
5 81.00
0%
$ 162.37
5 162.00
0%
$ 243.55
5 243.00
0%
$ 80.18
8 6100
0%
$ 114 .33
5 11400
0%
$ 162.37
$ 162 .00
0%
$ 228 .66
5 22600
0%
$ 309.84
$ 309.00
0%
$ 60.05
5 60 CO
0%
$ 84.05
$ 8400
1%
$ 120 .09
5 120 .00
0%
$ 169 .09
5 169.0
0%
$ 229.14
5 229.0
0%
$ 35.55
5 35 .00
2%
5 51 .00
$ s1.W
2%
$ 01.10
0 11.00
0%
$ 207.04
5 207.0
0%
$ 151.50
$ 151 .0
0%
$ 236 .83
5 236 .00
0%
$ 268.12
5 266 W
0%
$ 207 .04
5 207 .0
0%
$ 207.04
$ 207 .00
0%
$ 208.20
5 205 .00
0%
$ 360.09
$ 350 .00
0%
$ 113 .55
5 113.00
0%
$ 360.09
$ 360.00
0%
$ 113.55
$ 113.00
0%
$ 192.15
$ 190.0
0%
$ 205.49
5 205 .00
0%
$ 192.15
5 192.0
0%
$ 227 .11
$ 217.0
0%
$ 192.15
5 19200
0%
$ 205.49
5 205.0
0%
$ 379.98
$ 379 00
0%
$ 346.13
5 346 .00
0%
37 Building Fees
Type
Su btype
NI
327
Building Permit
Residential Electric Vehicle Charging
Statio ns
328
,.u„ s ors Cn ,_. .,.
,"•i;icie cll,,:'vel,iciethardi.0
329
Buildin g Permit
Commercial Electric Vehicle
Charging Stations
1 to 3 EVCS
330
.1_,i a,h 4 p�a,a E'0 �; s.

Co mmercial Electric Vehicle
Charging Stations
1 to 3 EVES 25kw each space
332
Buildin g Permit
Co mmercial Elec tric Vehicle
Charging Stations
4to6 EVES
333
',A., Yiaa,t theta
Co mmercia l Electric Vehicle
Chargin g Sta tions
4 t 6 EVES 50kw each space
335
Buildin g Per mit
Co mmercia l Electric Vehicle
Charging Stations
7 to 12 EVCS
336
.fw1:N0 e e,,,r, ch,:+_
Commercia l Electric Vehicle
Charging Stations
7 to 12 EVCS 50kw each spate
341
Buildin g Pe rmit
Co mmercial Electric Vehicle
Charging Station s
19 to 26 EVCS
342
a:,liU.n gii.,1.0 , :,..
commercial Electric Vehicle
Charging Station s
19 to 26 EVCS 50kw each space
344
Buildin g Permit
Comme rcial Electric Vehicle
Charging Station s
27 to 34 EVCS
345
001000, Plan Ch, .:

Co mmercial Electric Vehicle
Charging Stations
27 to 34 EVES 50kw eachspare
347
Building Pe rmit
Commercial Electric Vehicle
Charging Station s
>34 EVCS (combination of above)
348
a.n ,0lnd e la nChecktommerclal
Electric Vehicle
Charging Statio ns
> 34 EVCS (combination of abo ve)
349
Buadbmg Permit
Struc tu re/Spac e an d
Similar Structures
=500& ,..;;00 &,10100 sti. rt.
353
Building Permit
Non -Habitable Structure/Space and
Similar Structures
>=1000&
r .11U06,1000., It.
355
BuildIn g Pe rmitRes idential
Poo l/An d or Spa
(Includes MEP)
356
n,ilding Pla n [Tick
ie siihflliai Po ol/And 0r Spa
Orland., MEP) - Plan Chalk
357
Building Pe rmitComme rc ial
PooVAnd or Spa
(Includes MEP)
358
- I_,. ,.,. _,.,.
ci0I Po ol/And 0, 50. 6
Cocririio. ... ..r
(in,0(01:5 MEP)- Han (i,,k
359
Grading Permit
Permits fo r Pro jects
010,000 s q. ft.

See No te 1
See
Wlllden•
Fite Mans
Exa miner
Walden - Fire
I nspector
Plan • DIRECTOR

OF PAINING
Walden•
Building
Official
WlNdan-ChM
Engineer Mans
E xaminer
Walden•
Senior R eadi ng
impactor
W0ldan •
Seni or Plans
Examiner
Senior
Per1N
Technician
Wll ldan•
Permit
Technician
Stormwater Wat er
Permit Compliance
E ngineer
Pri ndp al
C ons ultant
$14014
$111 .x0
$353.00
$178.70
8151 0E
8133.56
$140 .64
$64 .08
$86.47
- $166 .80
8164.80

20.00 13000
boo
50 00
.(' 50
25 .00
150.00
2000
150 001
3300
20 .00
tot 00
301,]
30 .00
180 .00
1 000
100 .00
45 00
2000
21300
45151

35.00 210.00
3 0161
240 0(1
4S 111

95.00 260.101
45110

40.00 240.00
3500
2)000
4500

40.00 30000
45 o
500 0
7x000

45.00 320.(0,
50,00
50 (Vt
340.00

60.00 55.00
32 000

55.00 3 (5.0 0
6000

65.00 38000
60 00
2 00
160 .00
001.01
0 .500
10 00
33000
S.O,i
3010.00
12 .00
11511
.11!100
Vita)
4,000
I NI . W
2000
240.00
ton,,
16000
00 0,
3000
42000

1.5 101
240.00
.+01 5.
111.00
100. 00
16000
F ull Cost
Scanted Fa
Nora
S ubsidy %
$ 346.83
$ 346 .00
0%
$ 198.76
0 198 .00
0%
$ 405.92
$ 405 .00
0%
$ 454.40
$ 45400
0%
$ 524.72
$ 52400
0%
$ 487.10
$ 487 00
0%
$ 554.98
5 554 .00
0%
$ 625.30
$ 625.00
0%
$ 568.29
5 568 CO
0%
$ 725.40
$ 725.00
0%
$ 787.18
$ 787.00
0%
$ 649.47
0 649 .00
0%
$ 810.62
$ 810.00
0%
0 895.83
$ 895 .00
0%
0 767.64
$ 767.00
0%
$ 965.77
$ 965 .00
0%
$ 1,043.87,
5 1,043 00
0%
$ 870.92
$ 670 00
0%
$ 1,105.64
$ 1,10500
0%
$ 1,182.30
$ 1,182 .00
0%
$ 413.12
$ 450.00
-9%
$ 275 .81
S 275.00
0%
$ 759.00
5 75800
0%
$ 1,054.72
$ 1 ,054.00
0%
$ 906 .47
$ 906 .00
0%
$ 1 ,382.12
$ 1,381 00
0%
$ 589,90
$ 589 .00
0%
0 538 .17
$ 538.00
0%
$ 1,017.44
$ 1,017.00
0%
$ 742 .70
0 742 00
0%
$ 651.39
$ 651.00
0%
38 Buildin g Fees
I I Type I $u 61ypa I lr bgyp e ■ I Su btyp e II
360
,;raJ�r,e Pion Check
Gradng Perniiis tu n PrUjccts
See Note1
,0,000 59, lr
361
Gradin g PrmB
G rading Pe rmits fo r Projects
1410,000 k 10,000
sq. h.

Fire Plan Review
Se e N ote 1
381
Fire Permit
Reside ntial Mufti -Family 010,000
sq. ft.

Fire Inspectio n
See No te 1
382
Fire Plan Check
Commercial a10,005q, h.

Fire Plan Review
Se e N ote 1
383
Fire Permit
Commercial 10,W0sq. h
Fire Pran Review
Se e Note 1
385
Fire Permit
Commercial 010,000 59. 0
Fire Inspec tion
See No te 1
386
State man date d fire inspec tion
Me hl-Famliy Residential 3-10 Un its
387
State man date d Fire Inspectio n
Multi -Fa mily Residen tial 11.20
unit,
388
State mandated Fire Inspection
Mu lti -Family Residential 2l-30
Units
389
State man date d Fire Inspectio n
Mu hF Family Residential 31-45
Un its
390
State mandate d Fire Inspection
Mu lti.Family Re sidential >45 Un its
>45 Un its (Combin ation of Above)
391
State manda te d Fire In spection
A ssisted Owing 1-25 Residen ts
392
State manda ted Fire Inspection
Assisted living 2650 Residents
Walde n-
Fire Plans
Examiner
Wilidan - Fire
Inspector
Plan - DIRECT OR

OF PAINING
Wilidan -
B uilding
Official
Walden• C NN
Engi neer Plans
Examiner
Wlliden-
S eni or Buildi ng
inspector
Wiliden -
Senior Pl ans
Exami ner
S enior
Permit
Technkian
Wllidan -
Permit
Technician
St ormweter Water
Permit Compliance
Engi ne er
Pri ncipal
C ons ulta nt
$16044
$110.00
0313.501
$171.70
$151.06
$132 .54
$140.61
$11.00
616 17
$119.61
$166.64
n5'',
1:00,
240.00
300 .00

35.Ut

15.00 15,00
0000

30.00 30 .t5
15 .00
60 00
60 .W
1 10

25.00 25.00
1 100

15.00 34.00

20.0 IRO. W
70 W
00 .00
110 .00
14 .00
1400
170.00
IOo.O

70.00 60.00
190.01
4400
720.00

30.0 115.00
306.00
4160
1, 000 00
35 .00
110.00
6002
0000
720.00
1000
'31.00
3001
4100
1,080,0

15.0u
120.00
600.0)

60.00 12000
1900
100.0
1600
000 OD
1111
740.00
7100
'. 'nre7
1$.00
IOpbr

30.00 Full C ost
Suggest ed Fee
Not es
S ubsidy %
$ 1,813 .36
$ 1,013.0
0%
$ 1 ,377.72
$ 1,377.00
0%
$ 3,273.16
$ 3,273 .00
0%
$ 172.67
$ 172.00
0%
$ 151 .06
5 151 .00
0%
$ 172.67
$ 172.00
0%
$ 151.06
5 151.00
0%
$ 175,82
$ 175.00
0%
$ 49.24
$ 49 .00
0%
$ 24.50
$ 74 .00
2%
$ 132.58
$ 13200
0%
$ 132.58
$ 13 100
0%
$ 198.86
5 198.0
0%
$ 300.99
$ 30 .0
0%
$ 865 .38
$ 565.00
0%
$ 653.69
5 653 00
0%
$ 567.95
5 5670
0%
$ 493.44
$ 493 CO
0%
$ 1,957.16
$ 1,957 .00
0%
$ 733.04
$ 733 .0
0%
$ 2,808 .68
$ 7,8040
0%
$ 1,376.74
$ 1,3760
0%
$ 1,957.16
$ 1 .957.0
0%
$ 733.04
5 733.0
0%
$ 2,808 .68
$ 1804.0
0%
$ 1,376.74
5 1,37600
0%
$ 269.39
$ 269.0
0%
$ 404.09
5 404 .0
0%
$ 458 .91
$ 45a 00
0%
$ 553.67
S 553.0
0%
$ 284.28
$ 200 0
0%
$ 418.98
$ 410.0
0%
39 Building Fees
:. . ..

I
Type
Su bsype
Subtype M
S uMy pe MI:. .._..
393
State mandated Fire In spectio n
Assisted Livin g >50 Residents
>50 Resid ents (Combination of Abov e)
394
State mandated Fire Inspectio n
Hotel/Motel 1-26 Units
395
State mandated Fire in spection
Hotel/M otel 2450 Units
396
State mandated Fire in spection
Multi -Family Residen tial >45 un its
050 Units (Combi nati on of Ab ove)
397
State mandated Fire in spection
Rehab/Halfway/State Licensed
Facility
(Additional fees apply f or over 6 h ours)
398
Sta te mandated Fire Inspection
Hospita l/Clinic
(Additional t ees apply for over 6 h ours)
399
State mandated Fire in spec tion
School
(Additional t est apply f or over 6 hours)
400
State mandated Fire Inspection
Hourly Rate
Notes:

Multi -family, mixe d -use pro jects, muitl-sto ry (above two flo ors), re stau rants, other asse mbly uses, types of constructi on 1 other than type V -B, an d grading projects could Incre ase plan revie w and Inspection fees at the applicable hourly rate.

Indiffere nt = Res or Co mm
Willdan -
Flee Plans
Exam iner
Wilkien - Fire
Inspector
Plan- OIRFCTOR

OF PLANNING
Willda n -
Building
Official
Willda n - Ci vil
Engineer Plans
Examin er
Willdan -
Senior Buildi ng
inspector
Willdan-
S eni or Pla ns
Examiner
Senior
Permit
Technician
Willdan -
P ermit
Technician
St ormwater Water
Permit C omplia nce
Engineer
Pri ncipal
Consultant
010 0.14
$ttS. .O
0300.50
f171 276
$151 .0 6
013].6.
$10 0.14
SS,.p n
$00 .07
5566.00
5166.00
1 50(5)
2 .00
200 00

25.00 360 .011

30.00 31(0. 01

30.00 3001X)

30.00 80.Cx)
40 Full C ost
S uggested F ee
N otes
Subsidy %
$ 359.08
S 359.00
0%
$ 473.80
$ 473.00
0%
$ 808.17
$ 80800
0%
$ 808 .17
$ 806 .00
0%
$ 808.17
$ 808 00
0%
$ 119.80
$ 119.00
1%

rwi LLDAN
27368 Via Industria, Suite 200
Temecula, California 92590-4856
800.755.6864 I Fax: 888.326.6864
951.587.3500 I Fax: 951.587.3510
www.willdan.com
-49-

Docusign Envelope ID: 779D3702-1B92-873A-8042-08B7BCD1A833 Building Fees
#
Category
Fee Description
1 Building Permit
Fees
Plumbing Permits not associated with Building
Permits, no plan check required
2 Building Permit
Fees
Mechanical Permits not associated with Building
Permits, no plan check recuired
3 Building Permit
Fees
Electrical Permits not associated with Building
Permits, no plan check recuired
4 Building Permit
Fees
Basic Building Permits (Window Change Outs,
Block Walls, Stucco/Siding or other similar activity
as determined by BldOff or his/her designee)
5 Building Permit
Fees
Demolition Permits, per structure
6 Building Permit
Fees
Miscellaneous Application/Service not associated
with a permit
7 Building Permit
Fees
Fireworks Stands
a
Building Permit
Fees
Carnivals, etc.
9 Building Permit
Fees
Single Family Residential Reroof (Each Structure)
>= 200 sc. ft.
1'0
Building Permit
Fees
Single Family Residential Reroof (Each Structure)
=500 & =500 & =1000 & <2000 sq. ft'
Effective July 1st
2025
Effective July 1st
2026
Notes
$ 118.00
$ 118.00
$ 118.00
$ 118.00
$ 118.00
$ 118.00
$ 118.00
$ 118.00
$ 257.00
$ 257.00
$ 257.00
$ 257.00
$ 184.00
$ 184.00
$ 257.00
$ 257.00
$ 257.00
$ 257.00
No Permit Required
No Permit Required
$ 360.00
$ 360.00
$ 360.00
$ 360.00
$ 360.00
$ 360.00
$ 360.00
$ 360.00
$ 515.00
$ 515.00
$ 515.00
$ 515.00
$ 515.00,
$ 545.00'
$ 450.00
$ 450.00,
Maximum: fee per state law is $450
pigs $15 per kilowatt for each kilowatt
above 15kW. The General Plan &
Zoning Ordinance and GIS Update
Fees may be reduced to adhere to
solar permit fee caps set by the state.
$ 553.00
$ 553.00
Maximum fee per state law is. $1,000.
$ 515.00
$ 515.00
$ 515.00
$ 515.00
$ 515.00
$ 515.00
$ 645.00
$ 645.00
$ 1,106.00
$ 1,106.00
$ 1,106.00
$ 1,106.00
$ 922.00
$ 922.00
$ 2,306.00
$ 2,306.00
$ 1,106.00
$ 1,106.00
$ 4,151.00
$ 4,151.00
-50-

Docusign Envelope ID: 779D3702-1892-873A-8042-08B7BCD1A833 Building Fees
#
Category
Fee Description
30 Building Permit
Fees
Grading Permits for Projects =10,000 & =2000 & =3000 & 5000 & 7000 & <=10000 sq. ft.' 36 Building Permit
Fees
Projects over 10,000 square feet, and/or not shown
in the Building Fee Section'
37 Building Permit
Fees
Water Efficient Landscape Permit
38 Fire Fees
Fire Sprinklers, Residential (plan check included)
39 Fire Fees
Fire Sprinklers, Commercial (plan check included)
40 Building Permit
Fees
Additional Plan Reviews (over 3 reviews)
41 Building Permit
Fees
Plan Revisions (after permits are issued)
Effective July 1st
2025
Effective July 1st
2026
Notes
$ 2,153.00
+ Actual Cost of
Stormwater Water
Permit Compliance
Engineer and
Principal Engineer's
time in excess of the
average time built into
the fee.
$ 2,153.00
+ Actual Cost of
Stormwater Water
Permit Compliance
Engineer and
Principal Engineer's
time in excess of the
average time built into
the fee.

Stormwater Water Permit Compliance
Engineer and Principal Engineer's time
were previously billed separately and
not part of the fee.
$ 4,120.00
+ Actual Cost of
Stormwater Water
Permit Compliance
Engineer and
Principal Engineer's
time in excess of the
average time built into
the fee.
$ 4,120.00
+ Actual Cost of
Stormwater Water
Permit Compliance
Engineer and
Principal Engineer's
time in excess of the
average time built into
the fee.

Stormwater Water Permit Compliance
Engineer and Principal Engineer's time
were previously billed separately and
not part of the fee.
$ 6,459.00
$ 6,459.00
$ 9,220.00
$ 9,220.00
$ 11,073.00
$ 11,073.00
$ 12,919.00
$ 12,919.00
Based on time &
materials with a
minimum deposit of
$ 15,452.00
Based on time &
materials with a
minimum deposit of
$ 15,452.00
$ 92.00
$ 92.00
$ 1,545.00
$ 1,545.00
$ 2,961.00
$ 2,961.00
$ 276.00
$ 276.00
$ 460.00
$ 460.00
Notes:
1 Projects/structures typically include carports, garages, patio covers, remodels, room additions, new dwelling units, ADUs, tenant improvements, new commercial, new industrial, modifications to commercial and industrial, and storage.

It does not include grading or fire review.
-51-

Project Scope
Bellflower
Downey
Paramount
Lakewood
Cerritos
Long Beach
Proposed Fees
ADU, Ground up <750 sq. ft. - Plan Check Fee
$ 1,187 .00
$ 2,082 .58
$ 2,686.36
$ 2,182 .99
$ 1,849 .99
$ 1,090.95
ADU, Ground up <750 sq. ft. - Permit Fee
$ 1,547.00
$ 2,450.10
$ 3,160 .42
$ 2,585.38
$ 2,193.62
$ 1,454 .60
Permit Issuance Fee
$ 49.00
$ 58 .04
$ 57 .00
$ 47 .19
$ 39.99
$ 96 .00
ADU, Ground up <750 sq. ft. -Total Building fees
$ 2,783.00
$ 4,590.72
$ 5,903.78
$ 4,815.56
$ 4,083.60
$ 2,641 .55
ADU, Ground up 1,200 sq. ft. - 1200 SF - Plan Check Fee $ 2,286 .00
$ 2,772 .46
$ 3,701.05
$ 2,958 .45
$ 2,507 .16
$ 1,447.99
ADU, Ground up 1,200 sq. ft. - 1200 SF - Permit Fee
$ 3,095 .00
$ 3,261 .71
$ 4,369.65
$ 3,508.09
$ 2,977.16
$ 1,930.65
Permit Issuance Fee
$ 49.00
$ 58 .04
$ 57 .00
$ 47 .19
$ 39.99
$ 96.00
ADU, Ground up 1,200 sq. ft. -Total Building fee s
$ 5,430 .00
$ 6,092.21
$ 8,127.70
$ 6,513 .73
$ 5,524.31
$ 3,474.64
ADU, Conversion <500 sq. ft. - Plan Check Fee
$ 751.00
$ 1,445 .07
ADU, Conversion <500 sq. ft. - Permit Fee
$ 884.00
$ 1,700 .09
Permit Issuance Fee
$ 49 .00
$ 58 .04
ADU, Conversion <500 sq. ft. -Total Building fees
$ 1,684 .00
$ 3,203.20
ADU, Conversion 1,200 sq. ft. - Plan Check Fee
$ 2,145.00
$ 2,405.38
ADU, Conversion 1,200 sq. ft. - Permit Fee
$ 2,933.00
$ 2,829.86
Permit Issuance Fee
$ 49.00
$ 58.04
ADU, Conversion 1,200 sq. ft. - Total Building fees
$ 5,127.00
$ 5,293.28
New SFR, ≥1,001 & <2,000 sq. ft. - Plan Check Fee
$ 2,500. 00
$ 3,805.65
$ 5,508 .14
$ 4,315.51
$ 3,657.21
$ 2,081 .32
New SFR, ≥1,001 & <2,000 sq. ft. - Permit Fee
$ 3,551.00
$ 4,477.24
$ 6,598.96
$ 5,122.83
$ 4,348 .37
$ 2,775.09
Permit Issuance Fee
$ 49.00
$ 58. 04
$ 57.00
$ 47 .19
$ 39 .99
$ 96 .00
New SFR, 21,001 & <2,000 sq. ft. -Total Building fees
$ 6,100.00
$ 8,340.93
$ 12,164.10
$ 9,485.53
$ 8,045.57
$ 4,952 .40
SFR addition, ≥500 & <1,000 sq. ft. - Plan Check Fee
$ 1,483.00
$ 2,772.34
SFR addition, ≥500 & <1,000 sq. ft. - Permit Fee
$ 1,783. 00
$ 3,261. 57
Permit Issuance Fee
$ 49. 00
$ 58. 04
SFR addition, 2500 & <1,000 sq. ft. -Total Building fees $ 3,315.00
$ 6,091.95

Project Scope
Bellflower
Downey
Paramount
Lakewood
Cerritos
Long Beach
New multi -family residential, ≥9,000 sq . ft. & 510,000 sq. ft . - Plan Check Fee
$ 9,623 .00
$ 14,227 .87
$ 21,300 .38
$ 16,315 .81
$ 13,826 .96
$ 7,497.48
New multi -family residential, ≥9,000 sq. ft. & 510,000 sq . ft . - Permit Fee
$ 10,174.00
$ 16,738 .67
$ 26,080 .97
$ 19,401 .77
$ 16,473 .71
$ 9,996.64
Permit Issuance Fee
$ 49.00
$ 58 .04
$ 57 .00
$ 47.19
$ 39 .99
$ 96 .00
New multi -family residential, ≥9,000 sq. tt. & 510,000 sq. ft. - Total Building fees
$ 19,846 .00
$ 31,024 .57
$ 47,438.35
$ 35,764.77
$ 30,340 .66
$ 17,590.12
Commercial T.I. , 1,500 sq. ft. - Plan Check Fee
$ 2,567 .00
$ 1,904.06
CommercialT.l., 1,500 sq. ft. - Permit Fee
$ 3,374.00
$ 2,240 .07
Permit Issuance Fee
$ 49 .00
$ 58.04
Commercial T.I., 1,500 sq. ft. - Total Building fees
$ 5,990 .00
$ 4,202.17
Commercial, Ground up 10,000 sq. ft.- Plan Check Fee
$ 9,747 .00
$ 18,439 .19
$ 14,086 .35
$ 11,937.59
$ 6,494.73
Commercial, Ground up 10,000 sq. ft. - Permit Fee
$ 9,995 .00
$ 22,551.29
$ 16,952 .98
$ 14,425.02
$ 8,659.64
Permit Issuance Fee
$ 49.00
$ 57 .00
$ 47 .19
$ 39.99
$ 96 .00
Commercial, Ground up 10,000 sq. ft. - To tal Building fees $ 19,791.00
$ 41,047.48
$ 31,086.52
$ 26,402 .60
$ 15,250 .36
Commercial, Ground up 20,000 sq. ft. - Plan Check Fee
$ 15,017. 00
$ 35,887.98
$ 27,269.23
$ 23,109.52
$ 12,609.96
Commercial, Ground up 20,000 sq. ft. - Permit Fee
$ 15,748. 00
$ 44,076.89
$ 32,843 .05
$ 27,949.27
$ 16,813 .27
Permit Issuance Fee
$ 49. 00
$ 57.00
$ 47.19
$ 39 .99
$ 96.00
Commercial, Ground up 20,000 sq. ft. -Total Building fees $30,814 Deposit
$ 80,021.87
$ 60,159.47
$ 51,098.78
$ 29,519 .23
* Total fees do not include grading, fire, or M EPs.
**Downey, Paramount, Lakewood, Cerritos, and Long Beach fees are based on total valuation of the project. Bellflower fees are based on actual labor and material costs.

12-D
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

ATTENTION: Ryan Smoot, City Manager

FROM: Jim Dellalonga, Director of Economic Development

SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to conduct a public hearing to consider adopting Resolution No. 26-33 – A Resolution authorizing the City of Bellflower to join the Statewide Community Infrastructure Program (“SCIP”); authorizing the California Statewide Communities Development Authority to accept applications from property owners, conduct special assessment and Mello-Roos proceedings, levy assessments and special taxes, form assessment districts and community facilities districts, and issue bonds within the territory of the City of Bellflower; approving form of acquisition agreement for use when applicable; and authorizing related actions.

DATE: August 10, 2026

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

On April 13, 2026, the City Council authorized a development agreement with Bellflower 5 Inv, LLC (“Owner”) for the Flower Street Downtown Housing Project (“Project”). Owner requested the City participate in the Statewide Community Infrastructure Program (“SCIP”), sponsored by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (“CSCDA”). The SCIP allows property owners to finance development-related fees by issuing bonds from CSCDA. All such public capital improvements, including those eligible for payment from development related fees, are authorized under the “Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982” at Government Code §§ 53311–53368.9.

RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL

1) Open the public hearing; take documentary and testimonial evidence; and after considering the evidence, adopt Resolution No. 26-33; and

2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

FISCAL IMPACT

Adopting the Resolution would authorize CSCDA to issue bonds to finance development related fees. The estimated fees for the Project amounts to $700,000.

Page 1 of 2 ends

Page 1 of 47 ends

Staff Report – Resolution No. 26-33
August 10, 2026

Page 2 of 2 ends

DISCUSSION

CSCDA is a joint powers authority sponsored by the League of California Cities and the California State Association of Counties. Over 500 cities, counties, and special districts throughout California are members of CSCDA. The SCIP was instituted by CSCDA in 2002 to allow owners of property in participating cities and counties to finance the development related fees. If the Owner applies to participate in the SCIP, and the City approves the application, development related fees in the amount of $700,000, may be financed by CSCDA bonds. The Owner, in consultation with the City and the SCIP team, may request that CSCDA form a financing district. Upon such request, CSCDA will establish and administer the district and levy an assessment or special tax, as applicable, on the Owner’s Property to repay the portion of the SCIP bonds allocable to the Project.

The benefits of the SCIP to the City include:

• Not liable for repayment of the bonds issued by CSCDA or for the assessments or special taxes, as applicable, imposed on the participating properties. • CSCDA handles all district formation, district administration, bond issuance and bond administration functions. A participating city, county or special district can provide tax-exempt financing to property owners through SCIP while committing virtually no staff time to administer the program.

For home buyers purchasing homes in the Project, paying the costs of public infrastructure through an assessment or special tax can be a better alternative than having these costs added to the mortgage balance. The tax bill will be higher, but the amount of mortgage is smaller, making it easier to qualify for a home purchase.

The draft Resolution authorizes the City’s participation in the SCIP. It also authorizes CSCDA to form assessment districts and community facilities districts within the City’s boundaries, conduct assessment and special tax proceedings and levy assessments and special taxes against the property of the Owner.

The Resolution further authorizes execution of a joint community facilities agreement to be executed into between CSCDA and the City.

ATTACHMENTS

Resolution No. 26-33…………………………………………..…………………...……….….3 Memorandum regarding the Resolution and Related Materials for joining the SCIP…....11

Page 2 of 47 ends

Page 1 of 8 ends

CITY OF BELLFLOWER

RESOLUTION NO. 26-33

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF BELLFLOWER TO JOIN

THE STATEWIDE COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM
("SCIP"); AUTHORIZING THE CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE

COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT

APPLICATIONS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS, CONDUCT SPECIAL

ASSESSMENT AND MELLO-ROOS PROCEEDINGS, LEVY

ASSESSMENTS AND SPECIAL TAXES, FORM ASSESSMENT

DISTRICTS AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS, AND ISSUE BONDS WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF THE CITY OF BELLFLOWER;

APPROVING THE FORM OF ACQUISITION AGREEMENT FOR USE
WHEN APPLICABLE; AND AUTHORIZING RELATED ACTIONS

THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: Purpose. This Resolution authorizes the City of Bellflower (the "City") to participate in the Statewide Community Infrastructure Program ("SCIP") established by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (the "Authority") under its joint exercise of powers agreement dated June 1, 1988. Through SCIP, the Authority finances public capital improvements, development impact and related fees, and public services within the jurisdiction of its members. By this Resolution, the City joins SCIP and establishes the terms on which the Authority may accept applications from property owners, conduct special assessment and Mello-Roos proceedings, form assessment districts and community facilities districts, levy assessments and special taxes, and issue bonds within the City's territory to finance Improvements, Fees, and Services (as defined below).

SECTION 2: Authorized SCIP Financings. The City Council authorizes the City's participation in SCIP and authorizes the Authority to undertake the following financings within the City's territory, in each case in accordance with this Resolution and only if the affected Participating Developers voluntarily consent as required by law:

A. Special assessments levied under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Streets and Highways Code § 10000 et seq.) (the "1913 Act");

B. Improvement bonds issued under the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 (Streets and Highways Code § 8500 et seq.) (the "1915 Act"), secured by the unpaid special assessments;

C. Special taxes and special tax bonds levied and issued under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Government Code § 53311 et seq.) (the "Mello-Roos Act"), secured by the special taxes;

D. The financing of public services under the Mello -Roos Act through the levy of special taxes; and

Page 3 of 47 ends

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 26-33

Page 2 of 8 ends

E. Revenue bonds issued under the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985 (Government Code § 6584, et seq.) (the "Marks-Roos Act") to purchase Local Obligations in a SCIP pooled issuance.

SECTION 3: Definitions. Unless the contrary is stated or clearly appears from the context, the following definitions govern the construction of the words and phrases used in this Resolution:

"Acquisition Agreement" means the form of acquisition agreement approved under Section 13, for use with any Improvements that a Participating Developer constructs and installs and for which the Participating Developer requests acquisition financing as part of its SCIP application.

"Acquisition and Construction Fund" has the meaning set forth in Section 9.

"Agency Fees" means the Fees paid or to be paid to the City.

"Agency Improvements" means the Improvements to be owned by the City.

"Agency Services" means the Services to be provided by the City.

"Assessment Districts" means assessment districts formed by the Authority under the 1913 Act.

"Authority" means the California Statewide Communities Development Authority ("CSCDA"), a joint-powers authority formed and operating under a joint exercise of powers agreement dated June 1, 1988 (the "Joint Powers Agreement"), entered into under the Joint Exercise of Powers Act (Government Code § 6500, et seq.) (the "JPA Law").

"Authorized Signatory" means the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, or City Manager.

"CFDs" means community facilities districts formed by the Authority under the Mello-Roos Act.

"Fee Act" means, collectively, the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code § 66000, et seq.) and other law authorizing the levy of fees and charges on new development to pay for public capital improvements.

"Fees" means development impact fees, capacity fees, and other development - related charges eligible for funding under the Fee Act.

"Improvements" means certain public capital improvements constructed by or on behalf of property owners for acquisition by the City or another public agency, and improvements eligible for funding from the Fees.

"Indemnified Parties" has the meaning set forth in Section 11.

Page 4 of 47 ends

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 26-33

Page 3 of 8 ends

"Joint Agreement" has the meaning set forth in Section 8.

"Local Obligations" means, collectively, the Improvement Bonds and the Special Tax Bonds. "Improvement Bonds" means improvement bonds issued under the 1915 Act, secured by the unpaid special assessments. "Special Tax Bonds" means special tax bonds issued under the Mello-Roos Act, secured by the special taxes.

"Manual" means the "SCIP Manual of Procedures" prepared and updated from time to time by the Authority.

"Participating Developers" means owners of property being developed within the City's jurisdiction who voluntarily elect to participate in SCIP and consent to the levy of the assessments or special taxes, as applicable.

"Program Participants" means the members of the Authority.

"Proposed Boundaries" means the City's official boundaries of record at the time of the applicable proceedings, or any portion of those boundaries.

"ROI" means a Resolution of Intention adopted by the Authority in connection with assessment or CFD proceedings, substantially in the form presented to the City Council and attached as Exhibit A.

"SCIP" means the Statewide Community Infrastructure Program established by the Authority.

"Services" means public services that may be financed under the Mello -Roos Act to meet increased demands placed on local agencies as a result of development.

"Third Party Local Agency" means a local agency, other than the City, that will own, use, or provide Improvements, Fees, or Services.

SECTION 4: Local Approval. This Resolution constitutes full "local approval," under Section 9 of the Joint Powers Agreement, for the Authority to issue bonds from time to time in accordance with this Resolution and to issue any refunding bonds for those bonds.

SECTION 5: Consent to Special Assessment Proceedings. The City consents to the Authority's conduct of special assessment proceedings for SCIP under the 1913 Act, and to the issuance of Local Obligations under the 1915 Act, on any property within the Proposed Boundaries, but only if:

A. The proceedings are conducted under one or more Resolutions of Intention substantially in the form of the ROI; and

B. The Participating Developers, who will own the property when the Assessment District is formed, sign a written consent to the levy of assessments for SCIP by the Authority and sign an assessment ballot in

Page 5 of 47 ends

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 26-33

Page 4 of 8 ends

favor of the assessment, as required by Article XIIID, § 4 of the California Constitution.

SECTION 6: Consent to Mello-Roos Proceedings. The City consents to the Authority's conduct of proceedings under the Mello -Roos Act to form CFDs with boundaries coterminous with the Proposed Boundaries, to authorize a special tax, and to issue bonds for those CFDs, but only if the Participating Developers, who will own the property when the CFD is formed, sign a written consent to the levy of the special tax for SCIP by the Authority and sign a ballot in favor of forming the CFD under the Mello-Roos Act. The City approves the use of the local goals and policies the Authority adopted under Government Code § 53312.7 in forming CFDs.

SECTION 7: Facilities, Fees, and Services. CFDs the Authority forms may finance any or all of the facilities, fees, and services authorized under the Mello-Roos Act.

The City's appropriate officials and staff must cooperate with the Authority and its special tax consultant and other consultants to determine the facilities, fees, and services to be financed within each CFD and to calculate the appropriate special tax to fund the Services for each CFD, both at initial formation and at the annual levy. If Improvements, Fees, or Services are to be owned, used, or provided by a Third Party Local Agency, the Authority will separately identify them in its proceedings and will enter into a joint community facilities agreement with that Third Party Local Agency as required by the Mello-Roos Act.

Improvements and Fees will be funded through a CFD only if they are necessary to meet increased demands placed on the City by development occurring or expected within the proposed CFD, and Services will be funded through a CFD only if they are in addition to those provided in the CFD's territory before the CFD was created and do not supplant existing services. When each CFD is formed, the City must, if the Authority's procedures require, certify that these requirements are satisfied, in form and substance satisfactory to the Authority.

SECTION 8: Joint Community Facilities Agreement. This Resolution sets the terms of a "joint community facilities agreement" (as defined in Government Code § 53316.2) between the City and the Authority. The Authority's adoption of each ROI to form a CFD under the Mello-Roos Act to finance Agency Improvements, Agency Fees, or Agency Services constitutes the Authority's acceptance of these terms for that CFD. This Resolution and the Authority's ROI for each CFD together form a separate, independent joint community facilities agreement for each CFD the Authority forms (each, a "Joint Agreement"). The City Council finds and determines that this Resolution and each Joint Agreement benefit the City's residents and customers and are in the best interests of the City's residents and of the future residents of the area within the proposed CFDs.

SECTION 9: Acquisition and Construction Fund. Proceeds from the sale of Local Obligations, and CFD special tax proceeds available to finance the Improvements, must be deposited in one or more special funds for each development project (the "Acquisition and Construction Fund"), which the Authority must establish and maintain for as long as the proceeds remain. The Acquisition and Construction Fund will be available for Agency Improvements and Agency Fees and for the Improvements and Fees of each Third Party Local Agency. Subaccounts will be created as needed. The Authority must promptly give written notice (which may be delivered electronically) to the City of the

Page 6 of 47 ends

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 26-33

Page 5 of 8 ends

amount of Local Obligation proceeds or special taxes made available to finance Improvements and Fees. After all related Local Obligations for a CFD are retired, the Authority must remit any remaining special tax revenues from that CFD to the City and the other local agencies in the proportions specified in the Authority's proceedings. The City must apply any special tax revenues it receives only for authorized Agency Improvements, Agency Fees, or Agency Services, as applicable, and for its own administrative costs, and only as permitted by the CFD proceedings and the Mello-Roos Act.

SECTION 10: City Responsibility for Agency Improvements. As to the Authority and each Third Party Local Agency, the City must fully administer, and take full governmental responsibility for, the construction or acquisition of the Agency Improvements and the administration and expenditure of the Agency Fees . This responsibility includes environmental review; approval of plans and specifications; bid requirements; performance and payment bond requirements; insurance requirements; contract and construction administration; staking; inspection; acquisition of necessary interests in real or personal property; the holding back and administration of retention payments; and punch-list administration. The Authority and each Third Party Local Agency will have no responsibility for these matters. The City reserves the right, as to each Participating Developer, to require the Participating Developer to contract with the City to assume any or all of this responsibility.

SECTION 11: Indemnification — Construction. The City must indemnify and hold harmless the Authority, its other members, and those members' officers, agents, and employees, and each Third Party Local Agency and its officers, agents, and employees (collectively, the "Indemnified Parties") from all claims, suits, and damages (including costs and reasonable attorney fees) arising out of the design, engineering, construction, and installation of the Agency Improvements and the improvements to be financed or acquired with the Agency Fees. The City may require each Participating Developer, to assume, by contract with the City, any or all of this responsibility.

SECTION 12: Ownership, Maintenance, and Indemnification. As to the Authority and each Third Party Local Agency, once the Agency Improvements are constructed according to the approved plans and specifications and the City and the Participating Developer have put in place their agreed arrangements for funding maintenance of the Agency Improvements, the City must accept ownership of the Agency Improvements, take maintenance responsibility for them, and indemnify and hold the Indemnified Parties harmless — to the extent provided in Section 11 — from all claims, suits, and damages of the kind described in Section 11 arising out of the use and maintenance of the Agency Improvements. The City reserves the right, as to the Participating Developer, to require the Participating Developer to assume, by contract with the City, any or all of this responsibility.

SECTION 13: Acquisition Agreement. The City Council authorizes any Authorized Signatory to execute an Acquisition Agreement substantially in the form presented to the City Council, and as approved by the City Attorney. Any Authorized Signatory may individually execute the Acquisition Agreement and deliver it to the Participating Developer on the City's behalf, substantially in that form, with any changes

Page 7 of 47 ends

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 26-33

Page 6 of 8 ends

the Authorized Signatory approves after consulting the City Attorney and the Authority's bond counsel. Execution and delivery conclusively evidence that approval.

SECTION 14: SCIP Applications. The City's appropriate officials and staff must make SCIP applications available to all property owners who are subject to Fees for new development within the City, who are conditioned to install Improvements, or whose plans for new development within the City require new or increased Services, and must inform those owners of their option to participate in SCIP . The Authority is responsible for providing the applications and related materials at its own expense. The City must designate appropriate staff to coordinate with the Authority and must provide the appropriate contact information to the Authority from time to time.

SECTION 15: Administration; Authorized Actions. The Authority will administer the Assessment Districts and CFDs, including employing and paying all consultants, annually levying the assessments and special tax, and handling all aspects of paying and administering the Local Obligations, and will comply with all state and federal requirements that apply to the proceedings, including the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code. The City must cooperate with the Authority regarding the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code and, to the extent the City's information is needed, to enable the Authority to meet its disclosure and continuing-disclosure obligations for the Local Obligations and any revenue bonds. The City will not participate, and will not be considered a participant, in the proceedings for the CFDs (except as a party to each Joint Agreement), and the City is not, and will not be considered, an issuer of the Local Obligations or any revenue bonds. The City's appropriate officials and staff must execute and deliver the certificates, requisitions, agreements, and related documents — including any documents bond counsel requires — reasonably required by the Authority under the Manual to implement SCIP and to evidence compliance with federal and state law for the Authority's issuance of the Local Obligations and any other SCIP bonds. Any Authorized Signatory or other appropriate City official may give or take all amendments, consents, approvals, notices, orders, requests, and other actions permitted or required by this Resolution, any Joint Agreement, or any related document that may be necessary or desirable in connection with forming any Assessment District or CFD, issuing Local Obligations, or administering proceeds of Local Obligations or special taxes, without further authorization from this City Council.

SECTION 16: SCIP Manual of Procedures. The Authority has prepared, and will update from time to time, the "SCIP Manual of Procedures" (the "Manual"). The City must handle bond proceeds and special tax collections for properties participating in SCIP in accordance with the Manual.

SECTION 17: Public Benefits. Under Government Code § 6586.5, notice was published at least five days before the adoption of this Resolution, and the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the significant public benefits of SCIP and the financing of the Improvements and the public capital improvements to be paid for with the proceeds of the Fees. The City Council finds and declares that the Authority's issuance of revenue bonds to purchase Local Obligations, and the issuance of bonds to refund those revenue bonds, in connection with SCIP will provide significant public benefits, including, without limitation, savings in effective interest rate and in bond

Page 8 of 47 ends

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 26-33

Page 7 of 8 ends

preparation, underwriting, and issuance costs, and the more efficient delivery of local agency services to residential and commercial development within the City.

SECTION 18: Amendments. The City and the Authority may amend the terms of this Resolution and each Joint Agreement embodied by it by a writing duly authorized, executed, and delivered by both. After the Authority issues the Local Obligations, no amendment that would be detrimental to the interests of the bondholders may be made without complying with all bondholder-consent provisions governing the amendment of the bond resolutions, bond indentures, or similar instruments for all outstanding Local Obligations.

SECTION 19: No Third-Party Beneficiaries. Except for the indemnifications extended to each Third Party Local Agency in each Joint Agreement, and the City's agreement to take responsibility for and ownership of the Agency Improvements, no person or entity — including a Participating Developer — is a third-party beneficiary of this Resolution. Nothing in this Resolution, express or implied, is intended to confer on any person or entity, other than the Authority and the City (and their respective successors and assigns), any rights, remedies, obligations, or liabilities under or because of this Resolution.

SECTION 20: Specific Authorizations. The City Council specifically authorizes the following:

A. The City's participation in SCIP.

B. Property owners to apply to participate in SCIP, and the City Manager, or designee, to approve an application after review, but only if the City Manager, or designee, determines that approval is appropriate.

C. The Authority to accept applications from property owners, conduct special assessment proceedings, levy assessments and special taxes, and form Assessment Districts and CFDs within the City's territory.

D. The Authority to issue bonds to finance the selected Parks and Recreation Development Impact Fees for the Flower Street Downtown Housing Project.

E. The City Manager, or a designee, to execute any documents in a form approved by the City Attorney required to join SCIP.

SECTION 21: Duration of Consents. The City Clerk must transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the Secretary of the Authority. The consents and authorizations in this Resolution remain in force for any Assessment District and CFD formed until all Local Obligations have been retired and the authority to levy the special tax conferred by any CFD proceedings, and to levy the assessment conferred by any assessment proceedings, has ended or otherwise terminated.

Page 9 of 47 ends

City of Bellflower
Resolution No. 26-33

Page 8 of 8 ends

SECTION 22: Severability. If any part of this Resolution or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that the invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable.

SECTION 23: Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code § 16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.

SECTION 24: The Mayor, or presiding officer, is authorized to sign this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City of Bellflower, and the City Clerk, or her duly appointed deputy, may attest thereto.

SECTION 25: This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption and will remain effective unless repealed or superseded.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELLFLOWER ON THIS 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 2026.

________________________________
Sonny R. Santa Ines, Mayor
ATTEST:

_______________________________
Mayra Ochiqui, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________________
Karl H. Berger, City Attorney

Page 10 of 47 ends

MEMORANDUM
To: City of Bellflower
From: James Hamill, Managing Director, CSCDA
Date: June 2026
Re: Resolution and Related Materials for Joining the Statewide Community Infrastructure Program (“SCIP”)
It is our pleasure to enclose the following:
a. form of resolution by which the City of Bellflower (the “Agency”) becomes a participant in SCIP (the “Resolution”);
b. suggested language for a staff report to your City Council to accompany the Resolution; and
c. form of notice of public hearing for publication.

Please note the following respecting the above enclosures:

1. Suggested Staff Report. As indicated at the top of page one of this enclosure, it is provided only for your convenience and as an aid in preparing a staff report, assuming you follow such a practice. Feedback from other local agencies who have joined SCIP confirms that it is well-received as a useful tool, and it is provided to you in that spirit.

Please note that, as pointed out in this enclosure, consideration of the Resolution must take place at a noticed public hearing and cannot be included in a consent calendar.

2. Resolution. The Resolution authorizes CSCDA to form assessment districts and community facilities districts upon receipt of an application of a participating developer.

Exhibit A to the Resolution is itself a form of resolution of intention (ROI) to be adopted by the joint powers authority (CSCDA) in connection with any assessment districts formed within the jurisdiction of the Agency. It is attached for purely legal and informational purposes, and must be included as an exhibit to your resolution, but it is NOT for adoption by your City Council.

Following adoption of the Resolution, please have the attached Certification of Resolution completed by the City Clerk and a certified copy of the Resolution sent to SCIP, c/o Tricia Aguirre at Orrick 400 Capital Mall, Suite 3000, Sacramento, California 95814.

Page 11 of 47 ends

3. Notice of Public Hearing. Please note the directions in italics at the top of the enclosed form of notice of hearing, which confirm that the notice must be completed by filling in the blanks and bracketed inserts and further confirms that the notice is to be published one time at least five calendar days prior to the hearing. The Resolution cannot be adopted until the notice is duly published and a public hearing held.

Please retain and provide affidavit of publication together with the adopted Resolution to SCIP, c/o Tricia Aguirre at the above address.

4. Form of Acquisition Agreement. A form of Acquisition Agreement is provided for your convenience and should be made available to your City Council. If the Agency has a different preferred form, please feel free to provide to the SCIP team for review prior to adoption of the Resolution. The Resolution approves the Acquisition Agreement in said form. The Acquisition Agreement will be used in substantially said form when public capital facilities will be constructed by the participating developer and transferred to your Agency. The Resolution authorizes execution of the Acquisition Agreement by any Authorized Signatory. As above, please review the signing authority and confirm or provide the title or titles of the persons authorized to execute.

In conclusion, we appreciate the Agency’s interest in SCIP, and we look forward to working with you and other Agency staff to finance public capital improvements, development impact fees, capacity fees, other development related charges and public services for development projects in your Agency through SCIP. In the event you have any questions about the enclosures or the process, don’t hesitate to contact any of the program facilitators listed below.

Name Telephone E-Mail Address
James Hamill (925) 476-5644 [email protected]
Steffi Chan (415) 773-5466 [email protected]
Haley Ritter (949) 852-7797 [email protected]
Bob Williams (415) 445-8674 [email protected]
Luke Brewer (415) 770-3854 [email protected]

encl: Resolution
Form of Acquisition Agreement
Suggested Staff Report
Form of Notice of Public Hearing

Page 12 of 47 ends

Sample Staff Report
Resolution to Join SCIP
Note to Staff: The following is suggested language for use in a staff report to accompany the SCIP Resolution. Of course this is only a suggestion and you should feel free to edit as you see fit. This action requires a public hearing with notice published once in your regular official notice newspaper at least 5 days prior to the hearing. If you need assistance with this Notice, or if you would like CSCDA to review your staff report, final Resolution or agenda item, feel free to contact us and we will be happy to help.

Description: This item includes a brief staff presentation regarding the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (“CSCDA”) and participation in the Statewide Community Infrastructure Program (“SCIP”), which is sponsored by CSCDA, followed by City Council discussion, a public hearing to take public testimony on SCIP and bonds to be issued by CSCDA, and consideration of a resolution (the “Resolution”) making certain findings and authorizing certain matters necessary for the City of Bellflower (the “Agency”) to participate in SCIP.

Background: CSCDA is a joint powers authority sponsored by the League of California Cities and the California State Association of Counties. Over 500 cities, counties and special districts throughout California are members of CSCDA, including the Agency. SCIP was instituted by CSCDA in 2002 to allow owners of property in participating cities and counties to finance the development related fees that would be payable by property owners upon receiving development entitlements or building permits through a pooled special assessment districts program and later expanded to include financing of public capital improvements constructed by developers and public services necessary to support development in the Agency, as provided for in the proposed SCIP Resolution. Since its inception SCIP has issued over $1 billion in land secured special assessment and CFD bonds for development projects in California.

If a property owner applies to participate in SCIP, and the Agency approves the application, the selected public capital improvements, facilities and/or development related fees owed to the Agency will be financed by the issuance of bonds by CSCDA. Property owners, in consultation with the Agency and the SCIP team, can opt to have CSCDA form either an assessment district or a community facilities district. CSCDA determines whether the project will be included in the SCIP pool program (where no one developer within the SCIP pool is responsible for the payment related to any other project) or, depending on the projected bond sizing and other factors, implemented as a stand-alone financing. In either case, CSCDA will form the appropriate district and impose an assessment or special tax, as applicable, on the owner’s property to repay the portion of the bonds issued to finance public capital improvements, facilities and/or development related fees.

With respect to the financing of development related fees, the property owner will either pay the development fees at the time of permit issuance and will be reimbursed from the SCIP bond proceeds when the SCIP bonds are issued, or the fees will be funded directly from the proceeds of the SCIP bonds. In both cases, the fees are subject to requisition by the Agency at any time to make authorized fee expenditures, and the Agency is never at risk for payment of its fees. If the property owner is required to construct improvements to be dedicated to the Agency, the proposed SCIP Resolution includes a form of acquisition agreement to be used when such improvements are funded with SCIP bond proceeds, which outlines how a developer will be reimbursed for improvements as they are certified complete by the Agency.

The benefits of SCIP to the property owner include:
• Only property owners who choose to participate in the program will have assessments or special taxes imposed on their property.

Page 13 of 47 ends

• Instead of paying cash for public capital improvements and/or development related fees, the property owner receives low-cost, long-term tax-exempt financing of those fees, freeing up capital for other purposes.
• The property owner can choose to pay off the assessments or special taxes at any time. • For home buyers, paying for the costs of public infrastructure through an assessment or special tax is superior to having those costs "rolled" into the cost of the home. Although the tax bill is higher, the amount of the mortgage is smaller, making it easier to qualify. Moreover, because the assessment/special tax financing is at tax-exempt rates, it typically comes at lower cost than mortgage rates.
• Owners of smaller projects, both residential and commercial, can have access to tax-exempt financing of infrastructure. Before the inception of SCIP, only projects large enough to justify the formation of an assessment or community facilities district had access to tax-exempt financing. SCIP can finance projects as low as $500,000, which would not be economical on a stand-alone basis.

The benefits of SCIP to the Agency include:
• As in conventional assessment district and CFD financing, the Agency is not liable to repay the bonds issued by CSCDA or the assessments or special taxes, as applicable, imposed on the participating properties.
• CSCDA handles all district formation, district administration, bond issuance and bond administration functions. A participating city, county or special district can provide tax-exempt financing to property owners through SCIP while committing virtually no staff time to administer the program. • Providing tax-exempt financing helps participating cities and counties cushion the impact of rising public capital improvements costs and development related fees on new development. Many developers rely on assessment district or CFD financing through SCIP in making the decision to purchase land, thereby improving the Agency’s competitive advantage in attracting new development. • The availability of financing will encourage developers to pull permits and pay fees in larger blocks, giving the participating city, county or special district immediate access to revenues for public infrastructure, rather than receiving a trickle of revenues stretched out over time. As part of the entitlement negotiation process, the possibility of tax-exempt financing of fees can be used to encourage a developer to pay fees up front.
• In some cases, the assessments or special taxes on successful projects can be refinanced through refunding bonds. Savings achieved through a refinancing may be directed to lower property taxes subject to applicable federal tax limitations.

The proposed SCIP Resolution authorizes CSCDA to accept applications from owners of property within the planning jurisdiction to apply for tax-exempt financing of public capital improvements and development related fees through SCIP. It also authorizes CSCDA to form assessment districts and community facilities districts within the Agency’s boundaries, conduct assessment and special tax proceedings and levy assessments and special taxes against the property of participating owners.

In addition to the funding of public capital improvements and development related fees, the proposed SCIP Resolution authorizes CSCDA to form community facilities districts within the Agency’s boundaries to levy special taxes to fund public services necessitated by new development projects, if approved by the

Page 14 of 47 ends

participating property owner. Similar to the funding of public capital improvements and development related fees, once an application is received by the participating property owner and approved by the Agency, CSCDA handles all district formation and district administration. CSCDA will coordinate with the Agency annually to prepare the budget for the levy, and will levy and collect the special taxes for disbursement to the Agency when collected.

The Resolution further embodies the terms of a joint community facilities agreement to be entered into between CSCDA and the Agency for each community facilities district, setting provisions for collection and application of the special tax for use when a community facilities district is formed and approves the form of an acquisition agreement to be entered into between the Agency and the participating property owner/developer to provide the procedure for disbursement of bond proceeds to pay for facilities constructed by the property owner/developer. It also authorizes miscellaneous related actions and makes certain findings and determinations required by law.

Recommended Action: After City Council discussion and questions, open the public hearing to order and invite any interested members of the public to provide testimony regarding SCIP and the proposed action.

Upon the close of the hearing, if the City Council wishes to join SCIP and become a participating member agency in this program, it should adopt the proposed Resolution. The Resolution requires only a simple majority vote. If the Resolution is approved, the City Clerk should forward a certified copy to SCIP, c/o Tricia Aguirre, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 3000, Sacramento, CA 95814.

Page 15 of 47 ends

FORM OF NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PUBLISH AT LEAST 5 DAYS PRIOR TO HEARING
[Instructions to Staff: a completed notice in this format (but with all blanks filled in and bracketed language deleted) must be published once in a newspaper of general circulation, at least 5 calendar days prior to the meeting date. CSCDA will require the newspaper’s affidavit confirming the date of its publication. If you need help completing the notice, please contact CSCDA.]

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on _______, 20__, [Insert date of City Council meeting] a public hearing will be held so that the City of Bellflower (the “Agency”) may consider participating in the Statewide Community Infrastructure Program of the California Statewide Communities Development Authority. Participation in said program will enable property owners to finance public capital improvements and/or development related fees for public capital improvements imposed on new development. Said public capital improvements, if financed, will be among the public capital improvements required in connection with a given development project. Said development related fees, if financed, will be used by the Agency to pay for public capital improvements which will serve the Agency. All such public capital improvements, including those eligible for payment from development related fees, will be of a type and nature authorized under the “Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982,” being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 (beginning with Section 53311) of the Government Code of the State of California and/or of the type and nature authorized under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Streets and Highways Code Sections 10000 and following). Participation in said program does not itself authorize the Agency to impose additional public capital improvements or new or additional development related fees on any property owner.

The hearing will commence at ______ [insert time of hearing], or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, and will be held at __________ [insert street address and room number or name], Bellflower, California.

Interested persons wishing to express their views on the Agency’s participation in the SCIP program and the financing of public capital improvements and/or development related fees as described above will be given an opportunity to do so at the public hearing or may, prior to the time of the hearing, submit written comments to ______ [insert mailing address], Attention: _______ [insert title of person designated to receive written comments].

Dated: ________ [insert date of publication.]

CITY OF BELLFLOWER

[Name]
City Clerk

Page 16 of 47 ends

RESOLUTION NO. ________

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELLFLOWER AUTHORIZING

THE CITY OF BELLFLOWER TO JOIN THE STATEWIDE COMMUNITY
INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM; AUTHORIZING THE CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE

COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT APPLICATIONS FROM

PROPERTY OWNERS, CONDUCT SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS AND LEVY

ASSESSMENTS AND SPECIAL TAXES AND TO FORM ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS AND

COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF THE CITY OF BELLFLOWER; EMBODYING THE TERMS OF A JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES

AGREEMENT SETTING FORTH THE PROVISIONS FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCINGS; APPROVING FORM OF ACQUISITION AGREEMENT FOR USE WHEN APPLICABLE; AND AUTHORIZING RELATED ACTIONS
WHEREAS, the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (the “Authority”) is a joint exercise of powers authority, lawfully formed and operating within the State pursuant to an agreement (the “Joint Powers Agreement”) entered into as of June 1, 1988 under the authority of Title 1, Division 7, Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 6500) of the California Government Code (the “JPA Law”), the members of which include numerous cities, counties and local agencies in the State of California, including the City of Bellflower (the “Agency”); and
WHEREAS, the Joint Powers Agreement authorizes the Authority to undertake financing programs under any applicable provisions of State law to promote economic development, the stimulation of economic activity, and the increase of the tax base within the jurisdictional boundaries of its members (such members, the “Program Participants”); and WHEREAS, as one of the Programs under the Joint Powers Agreement, the Authority has established the Statewide Community Infrastructure Program (“SCIP”) to allow the financing of certain public capital improvements to be constructed by or on behalf of property owners for acquisition by the Agency or another public agency (the “Improvements”) and improvements eligible for funding from certain development impact fees, capacity fees and/or other development related charges (the “Fees”) levied in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act (California Government Code Sections 66000 and following) and other authority providing for the levy of fees and charges on new development to pay for public capital improvements (collectively, the “Fee Act”) through the levy of special assessments pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Streets and Highways Code Sections 10000 and following) (the “1913 Act”) and the issuance of improvement bonds (the “Improvement Bonds”) under the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 (Streets and Highways Code Sections 8500 and following) (the “1915 Act”) upon the security of the unpaid special assessments; and
WHEREAS, the “Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982,” being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 (beginning with Section 53311) of the Government Code of the State (the “Mello-Roos Act”) is an applicable provision of State law available to, among other things, finance public improvements and public services (“Services”) necessary to meet increased demands placed upon local agencies as a result of development; and

Page 17 of 47 ends

WHEREAS, the Authority also uses SCIP to allow the financing of Fees and Improvements through the levy of special taxes and the issuance of special tax bonds (the “Special Tax Bonds” and, together with the Improvement Bonds, the “Local Obligations”) under the Mello-Roos Act upon the security of the special taxes and to allow the financing of Services through the levy of special taxes under the Mello Roos Act; and
WHEREAS, the Agency desires to allow the owners of property being developed within its jurisdiction (“Participating Developers”) to participate in SCIP and to allow the Authority to conduct proceedings and to form community facilities districts (“CFDs”) and to issue Local Obligations under the Mello-Roos Act, as well as to conduct assessment proceedings to form assessment districts (“Assessment Districts”) under the 1913 Act and to issue Local Obligations under the 1915 Act, to finance Fees levied on such properties and Improvements, provided that such Participating Developers voluntarily agree to participate and consent to the levy of the assessments or special taxes, as applicable; and
WHEREAS, the Agency desires to allow the Participating Developers to participate in SCIP and to allow the Authority to conduct proceedings and to form CFDs to levy special taxes to finance Services, provided that such Participating Developers voluntarily agree to participate and consent to the levy of such special taxes; and
WHEREAS, from time to time when eligible property owners within the jurisdiction of the Agency elect to be Participating Developers, the Authority will conduct proceedings under the 1913 Act and the Mello-Roos Act and issue Local Obligations under the 1915 Act and the Mello- Roos Act to finance Fees and Improvements and, at the conclusion of such proceedings, will levy assessments or special taxes, as applicable on such property within the territory of the Agency; and
WHEREAS, both the Authority and the Agency are “local agencies” under the Mello-Roos Act; and
WHEREAS, the Mello-Roos Act permits two or more local agencies to enter into a joint community facilities agreement to exercise any power authorized by the Mello-Roos Act; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to enter into such joint community facilities agreements with the Authority from time to time to authorize the Authority to form CFDs from time to time within the territorial limits of the Agency to finance Fees, Improvements and Services necessitated by new development; and
WHEREAS, there has been presented to this meeting a proposed form of Resolution of Intention to be adopted by the Authority in connection with assessment proceedings (the “ROI”), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and the territory within which assessments may be levied for SCIP (provided that each Participating Developer consents to such assessment) shall be coterminous with the Agency’s official boundaries of record at the time of adoption of such ROI, and reference is hereby made to such boundaries for the plat or map required to be included in this resolution (this “Resolution”) pursuant to Section 10104 of the Streets and Highways Code; and

Page 18 of 47 ends

WHEREAS, there has also been presented to this meeting a proposed form of Acquisition Agreement (the “Acquisition Agreement”), a copy of which has been made available to the City Council and is on file with the City Clerk, to be approved as to form for use with respect to any Improvements to be constructed and installed by a Participating Developer and for which the Participating Developer requests acquisition financing as part of its SCIP application; and WHEREAS, the Agency will not be responsible for the conduct of any proceedings; the levy or collection of assessments or special taxes or any required remedial action in the case of delinquencies in such assessment or special tax payments; or the issuance, sale or administration of the Local Obligations or any other bonds issued in connection with SCIP; and WHEREAS, the Authority periodically issues Local Obligations on behalf of the local agency participants in SCIP to provide financing for the Fees and Improvements; and WHEREAS, where the Authority determines a project is eligible for a SCIP pooled issuance, the Authority issues revenue bonds pursuant to the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985, consisting of Article 4 (commencing with Section 6584) of Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the California Government Code (the “Marks-Roos Act”) concurrently with the issuance of Local Obligations, the proceeds of which are used to purchase the Local Obligations; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 6586.5, notice was published at least five days prior to the adoption of this Resolution at a public hearing, which was duly conducted by this City Council concerning the significant public benefits of SCIP and the financing of the Improvements and the public capital improvements to be paid for with the proceeds of the Fees; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Bellflower as follows:

Section 1. This Resolution shall constitute full “local approval,” under Section 9 of the Joint Powers Agreement, for the issuance of bonds by the Authority from time to time in accordance herewith and the issuance of any refunding bonds therefor.

Section 2. The Agency hereby consents to the conduct of special assessment proceedings by the Authority in connection with SCIP pursuant to the 1913 Act and the issuance of Local Obligations under the 1915 Act on any property within the Proposed Boundaries; provided, that:
(1) Such proceedings are conducted pursuant to one or more Resolutions of Intention in substantially the form of the ROI; and
(2) The Participating Developers, who shall be the legal owners of such property at the time of the formation of the Assessment District, execute a written consent to the levy of assessments in connection with SCIP by the Authority and execute an assessment ballot in favor of such assessment in compliance with the requirements of Section 4 of Article XIIID of the State Constitution.

Section 3. The Agency hereby consents to the conduct of proceedings by the Authority under the Mello Roos Act to form CFDs with boundaries that shall be coterminous with the

Page 19 of 47 ends

Agency’s official boundaries of record at the time of such proceedings or any portion thereof (the “Proposed Boundaries”), and to authorize a special tax and to issue bonds with respect thereto; provided that the Participating Developers, who shall be the legal owners of such property at the time of formation of the CFD, execute a written consent to the levy of special tax in connection with SCIP by the Authority and execute a ballot in favor of the formation of such CFD and the Mello-Roos Act. The Agency approves the use of the local goals and policies adopted by the Authority under Section 53312.7 of the Mello-Roos Act in connection with the formation of CFDs.

Section 4. CFDs formed by the Authority may finance any or all of the facilities, fees and services authorized under the Mello-Roos Act. The appropriate officials and staff of the Agency are hereby authorized and directed to cooperate with the Authority and the Authority’s special tax consultant and other consultants to determine facilities, fees and services to be financed within each CFD and to calculate the appropriate level of the special tax to fund the Services for each CFD in connection with initial formation and in connection with the annual levy. The facilities are referred to herein as the “Improvements,” and the Improvements to be owned by the Agency are referred to as the “Agency Improvements.” The Fees paid or to be paid to the Agency are referred to as the “Agency Fees”. The Services funded are referred to as “Services”, and Services to be provided by the Agency are referred to as the “Agency Services”. Improvements, Fees or Services to be owned, used or provided by another local agency (a “Third Party Local Agency”), the Authority will separately identify them in its proceedings and will enter into a joint community facilities agreement with such Third Party Local Agency as required by the Mello- Roos Act. The Agency acknowledges that Improvements and Fees will be funded through a CFD only if they are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the Agency as a result of development occurring or expected to occur within the proposed CFD and Services will be funded through a CFD only if they are in addition to those provided in the territory of the CFD before the CFD was created and will not supplant existing services. In connection with the formation of each CFD, as may be required by the Authority’s procedures, the Agency shall certify that such requirements are satisfied in form and substance satisfactory to the Authority.

Section 5. This Resolution sets the terms of a “joint community facilities agreement” (as defined in Section 53316.2 of the Mello Roos Act) between the Agency and the Authority.

Adoption of each Resolution of Intention to form a CFD under the Mello-Roos Act to finance Agency Improvements, Agency Fees or Agency Services shall constitute acceptance of the terms hereof by the Authority with respect to such CFD. This Resolution and the Authority’s Resolution of Intention for the respective CFDs shall together embody a separate and independent joint community facilities agreement for each CFD formed by the Authority (the “Joint Agreement”).

The City Council hereby finds and determines that this resolution and each Joint Agreement are beneficial to the residents/customers of the Agency and are in the best interests of the residents of the Agency, and of the future residents of the area within the proposed CFDs.

Section 6. Proceeds from the sale of Local Obligations and CFD special tax proceeds available to finance the Improvements shall be deposited in one or more special funds for each development project (the “Acquisition and Construction Fund”), which the Authority shall establish and maintain for so long as such proceeds remain. The Acquisition and Construction Fund will be available both for Agency Improvements and Agency Fees and for the Improvements and Fees pertaining to each Third Party Local Agency. Subaccounts shall be created as necessary.

The Authority shall promptly provide notice in writing (which may be delivered by electronic

Page 20 of 47 ends

means) to the Agency as to the amount of Local Obligation proceeds or special taxes made available to finance Improvements and Fees. The Authority will remit any special tax revenues from any particular CFD remaining after the final retirement of all related Local Obligations to the Agency and to the other local agencies in the proportions specified in the Authority’s proceedings.

The Agency will apply any such special tax revenues it receives for authorized Agency Improvements, Agency Fees and/or Agency Services, as applicable, and its own administrative costs only as permitted by respective CFD proceedings and by the Mello-Roos Act.

Section 7. As respects the Authority and each Third Party Local Agency, the Agency agrees to fully administer, and to take full governmental responsibility for, the construction or acquisition of the Agency Improvements and for the administration and expenditure of the Agency Fees, as applicable, including but not limited to environmental review, approval of plans and specifications, bid requirements, performance and payment bond requirements, insurance requirements, contract and construction administration, staking, inspection, acquisition of necessary property interests in real or personal property, the holding back and administration of retention payments, punch list administration, and the Authority and each Third Party Local Agency shall have no responsibility in that regard. The Agency reserves the right, as respects each Participating Developer, to require the Participating Developer to contract with the Agency to assume any portion or all of this responsibility.

Section 8. The Agency agrees to indemnify and to hold the Authority, its other members, and its other members’ officers, agents and employees, and each Third Party Local Agency and their officers, agents and employees (collectively, the “Indemnified Parties”) harmless from any and all claims, suits and damages (including costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees) arising out of the design, engineering, construction and installation of the Agency Improvements and the improvements to be financed or acquired with the Agency Fees. The Agency reserves the right, as respects each Participating Developer, to require the Participating Developer to assume by contract with the Agency any portion or all of this responsibility.

Section 9. As respects the Authority and each Third Party Local Agency, the Agency agrees – once the Agency Improvements are constructed according to the approved plans and specifications, and the Agency and the Participating Developer have put in place their agreed arrangements for the funding of maintenance of the Agency Improvements – to accept ownership of the Agency Improvements, to take maintenance responsibility for the Agency Improvements, and to indemnify and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties to the extent provided in the preceding paragraph from any and all claims, etc., arising out of the use and maintenance of the Agency Improvements. The Agency reserves the right, as respects the Participating Developer, to require the Participating Developer by contract with the Agency to assume any portion or all of this responsibility.

Section 10. The form of the Acquisition Agreement presented to the City Council is hereby approved, and the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, Director of Finance, and City Manager, or any such officer’s designee (each, an “Authorized Signatory”) are each individually authorized to execute, and deliver to the Participating Developer, the Acquisition Agreement on behalf of the Agency in substantially that form, with such changes as shall be approved by the Authorized Signatory after consultation with the City Attorney and the Authority’s bond counsel, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof.

Page 21 of 47 ends

Section 11. The terms of this Resolution and each Joint Agreement embodied by this Resolution may be amended by a writing duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Agency and the Authority, except that no amendment may be made after the issuance of the Local Obligations by the Authority that would be detrimental to the interests of the bondholders without complying with all of the bondholder consent provisions for the amendment of the bond resolutions, bond indentures or like instruments governing the issuance, delivery and administration of all outstanding Local Obligations.

Section 12. Except to the extent of the indemnifications extended to each Third Party Local Agency in each Joint Agreement embodied by this Resolution, and the Agency’s agreement to take responsibility for and ownership of the Agency Improvements, no person or entity, including the Participating Developer, shall be deemed to be a third party beneficiary of this Resolution, and nothing in this Resolution (either express or implied) is intended to confer upon any person or entity other than the Authority and the Agency (and their respective successors and assigns) any rights, remedies, obligations or liabilities under or by reason of this Resolution.

Section 13. The Agency hereby finds and declares that the issuance of revenue bonds by the Authority to purchase Local Obligations, and the issuance of bonds to refund such revenue bonds, in connection with SCIP will provide significant public benefits, including without limitation, savings in effective interest rate, bond preparation, bond underwriting and bond issuance costs, and the more efficient delivery of local agency services to residential and commercial development within the Agency.

Section 14. The Authority has prepared and will update from time to time the “SCIP Manual of Procedures” (the “Manual”), and the Agency will handle bond proceeds and special tax collections for properties participating in SCIP in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Manual.

Section 15. The appropriate officials and staff of the Agency are hereby authorized and directed to make SCIP applications available to all property owners who are subject to Fees for new development within the Agency and/or who are conditioned to install Improvements and/or whose plans for new development within the Agency necessitate new or increased levels of Services and to inform such owners of their option to participate in SCIP; provided, that the Authority shall be responsible for providing such applications and related materials at its own expense. The Agency shall designate appropriate staff who shall be responsible for coordination with the Authority, and shall provide the appropriate contact information to the Authority from time to time.

Section 16. The Authority will administer the Assessment Districts and CFDs, including employing and paying all consultants, annually levying the assessments and special tax and all aspects of paying and administering the Local Obligations, and complying with all State and Federal requirements appertaining to the proceedings, including the requirements of the United States Internal Revenue Code. The Agency will cooperate fully with the Authority in respect of the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code and to the extent information is required of the Agency to enable the Authority to perform its disclosure and continuing disclosure obligations with respect to the Local Obligations and any revenue bonds, although the Agency will not participate in nor be considered to be a participant in the proceedings respecting the CFDs (other

Page 22 of 47 ends

than as a party to each Joint Agreement) nor will the Agency be or be considered to be an issuer of the Local Obligations nor any revenue bonds. The appropriate officials and staff of the Agency are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver such certificates, requisitions, agreements and related documents, including but not limited to such documents as may be required by bond counsel in connection with the participation in SCIP of any districts, authorities or other third-party entities entitled to own Improvements and/or to levy and collect Fees on new development to pay for public capital improvements within the jurisdiction of the Agency, as are reasonably required by the Authority in accordance with the Manual to implement SCIP and to evidence compliance with the requirements of federal and state law in connection with the issuance by the Authority of the Local Obligations and any other bonds for SCIP. Further, all amendments, consents, approvals, notices, orders, requests and other actions permitted or required by this Resolution, any Joint Agreement, or any document executed in connection with Local Obligations and revenue bonds issued by the Authority, which may be necessary or desirable in connection with the formation of any Assessment District or CFD, issuance of Local Obligations, or administration of proceeds of Local Obligations or special taxes may be given or taken by any Authorized Signatory or other appropriate official of the Agency without further authorization by this City Council.

Section 17. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. The City Clerk of the City of Bellflower is hereby authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the Secretary of the Authority. This Resolution shall remain in force with respect to any Assessment District and CFD formed until all Local Obligations have been retired and the authority to levy the special tax conferred by any CFD proceedings and to levy the assessment conferred by any assessment proceedings has ended or is otherwise terminated. * * *
PASSED AND ADOPTED this ____ day of ____________, 20__ by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: City Council Members

NOES: City Council Members

ABSENT: City Council Members

ABSTAIN: City Council Members

Page 23 of 47 ends

A-1
4155-8093-8767.14

EXHIBIT A TO THE RESOLUTION

FORM OF RESOLUTION OF INTENTION

TO BE ADOPTED BY CSCDA
For Assessment Districts Only
RESOLUTION NO. __SCIP-

RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE

COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO FINANCE CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR THE PAYMENT OF DEVELOPMENT RELATED

FEES FOR PUBLIC CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PROPOSED

STATEWIDE COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. ___ ([NAME OF PROJECT]) CITY OF BELLFLOWER, COUNTY OF [___], APPROVING A PROPOSED BOUNDARY MAP, MAKING

CERTAIN DECLARATIONS, FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS

CONCERNING RELATED MATTERS, AND AUTHORIZING RELATED

ACTIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
WHEREAS, under the authority of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (the “1913 Act”), being Division 12 (commencing with Sections 10000 and following) of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “Code”), the Commission (the “Commission”) of the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (the “Authority”) intends to finance, through its Statewide Community Infrastructure Program, the payment of certain development impact fees, capacity fees and/or other development related charges for public improvements (the “Improvement Fees”) and/or to finance certain public capital improvements to be constructed by or on behalf of the property owner(s) and to be acquired by the [City/County of __] or another local agency (the “Improvements”) as described in Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein, all of which are of benefit to the property within the proposed Statewide Community Infrastructure Program Assessment District No. ___ ([name of project]) City of [__], County of [__] (the “Assessment District”); WHEREAS, the Commission finds that the land specially benefited by the Improvements and/or the Improvement Fees is shown within the boundaries of the map entitled “Proposed Boundaries of California Statewide Communities Development Authority Statewide Community Infrastructure Program Assessment District No. ___ ([name of project]) City of [__], County of [__],” a copy of which map is on file with the Secretary and presented to this Commission meeting, and determines that the land within the exterior boundaries shown on the map shall be designated “Statewide Community Infrastructure Program Assessment District No. ___ ([name of project]) City of [__], County of [__]”; WHEREAS, the City of Bellflower is a member of the Authority and has approved the adoption on its behalf of this Resolution of Intention and has consented to the levy of the assessments in the Assessment District;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Commission of the California Statewide Communities Development Authority hereby finds, determines and resolves as follows:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct.

Section 2. Pursuant to Section 2961 of the Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 (the “1931 Act”), being Division 4 (commencing with Section 2800) of the

Page 24 of 47 ends

A-2
4155-8093-8767.14

Code, the Commission hereby declares its intent to comply with the requirements of the 1931 Act by complying with Part 7.5 thereof.

Section 3. The Commission has designated a registered, professional engineer as Engineer of Work for this project, and hereby directs said firm to prepare the report containing the matters required by Sections 2961(b) and 10204 of the Code, as supplemented by Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution.

Section 4. The proposed boundary map of the Assessment District is hereby approved and adopted. Pursuant to Section 3111 of the Code, the Secretary of the Authority is directed to file a copy of the map in the office of the County Recorder of the [County of __________] within fifteen (15) days of the adoption of this resolution.

Section 5. The Commission determines that the cost of financing the Improvements and/or the payment of the Improvement Fees shall be specially assessed against the lots, pieces or parcels of land within the Assessment District benefiting from the financing of the Imp rovements and/or the payment of the Improvement Fees. The Commission intends to levy a special assessment upon such lots, pieces or parcels in accordance with the special benefit to be received by each such lot, piece or parcel of land, respectively, from the financing of the Improvements and/or the payment of the Improvement Fees.

Section 6. The Commission intends, pursuant to subparagraph (f) of Section 10204 of the Code, to provide for an annual assessment upon each of the parcels of land in the proposed Assessment District to pay various costs and expenses incurred from time to time by the Authority and not otherwise reimbursed to the Authority which result from the administration and collection of assessment installments or from the administration or registration of the improvement bonds and the various funds and accounts pertaining thereto.

Section 7. Bonds representing unpaid assessments, and bearing interest at a rate not to exceed twelve percent (12%) per annum, will be issued in the manner provided by the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 (Division 10 of the Code), and the last installment of the bonds s hall mature not to exceed twenty- nine (29) years from the second day of September next succeeding twelve (12) months from their date.

Section 8. The procedure for the collection of assessments and advance retirement of bonds under the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 shall be as provided in Part 11.1 thereof.

Section 9. Neither the Authority nor any member agency thereof will obligate itself to advance available funds from its or their own funds or otherwise to cure any deficiency which may occur in the bond redemption fund. A determination not to obligate itself shall not prevent the Authority or any such member agency from, in its sole discretion, so advancing funds.

Section 10. The amount of any surplus remaining in the improvement fund after acquisition of the Improvements and/or payment of Improvement Fees and all other claims shall be distributed in accordance with the provisions of Section 10427.1 of the Code.

Section 11. To the extent any Improvement Fees are paid to the Authority in cash with respect to property within the proposed Assessment District prior to the date of issuance of the bonds, the amounts so paid shall be reimbursed from the proceeds of the bonds to the property owner or developer that made the payment.

Page 25 of 47 ends

A-3
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority this ___ day of ______, 20__.

I, the undersigned, an Authorized Signatory of the California Statewide Communities Development Authority, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Commission of the Authority at a duly called meeting of the Commission of the Authority held in accordance with law on _____ __ , 20__.

By
Authorized Signatory
California Statewide Communities
Development Authority

Page 26 of 47 ends

4155-8093-8767.14

EXHIBIT A TO THE RESOLUTION OF INTENTION

DESCRIPTION OF WORK
The payment of development impact fees, capacity fees and/or other development related charges levied within the Assessment District and/or public capital improvements to be acquired and owned by the City of Bellflower or another local agency upon or for the benefit of parcels within the Assessment District, for the project known as [Project Name], which are authorized to be financed pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 and as to which the owners of the applicable parcels within the Assessment District have applied for participation in SCIP, as more particularly described below.

PAYMENT OF IMPACT FEES, CAPACITY FEES AND/OR OTHER DEVELOPMENT

RELATED CHARGES

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS*

*Capital improvements includes funding for incidental costs associated with the capital improvements, including but not limited to, contingency, design, engineering, and construction management [End of Form of Resolution of Intention]

Page 27 of 47 ends

4155-8093-8767.14

CERTIFICATION OF RESOLUTION
I, the undersigned, the duly appointed and qualified City Clerk of the City of Bellflower, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ___________ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Bellflower duly and regularly held at the regular meeting place thereof on the _______ day of __________, 20__, of which meeting all of the members of said City Council had due notice and at which a majority thereof were present.

An agenda of said meeting was posted at least 72 hours before said meeting at _____________________, a location freely accessible to members of the public, and a brief description of said resolution appeared on said agenda.

Notice of public hearing was published in [name of newspaper] at least 5 days prior to the hearing.

I have carefully compared the foregoing with the original minutes of said meeting on file and of record in my office, and the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the original resolution adopted at said meeting and entered in said minutes.

Said resolution has not been amended, modified or rescinded since the date of its adoption and the same is now in full force and effect.

Dated: _______________, 20__
_________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Bellflower

By: ______________________________

Seal

Page 28 of 47 ends

1 4155-8093-8767.14

FORM OF ACQUISITION AGREEMENT
_____________________

CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

STATEWIDE COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM

ACQUISITION AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN

CITY OF BELLFLOWER
AND
[DEVELOPER]

Dated as of _______, 20__

Page 29 of 47 ends

B-2 4155-8093-8767.14

ACQUISITION AGREEMENT
Recitals
A. The parties to this Acquisition Agreement (the “Agreement”) are the CITY OF BELLFLOWER, (the “Local Agency”), and [DEVELOPER], a [indicate type of legal entity] (the “Developer”).

B. The effective date of this Agreement is ________, 20__.

C. The Developer has applied for the financing of, among other things, certain public capital improvements to be owned by the Local Agency (collectively, the “Acquisition Improvements”) through the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (the “Authority”) and its Statewide Community Infrastructure Program (“SCIP”). [For CFDS:][The Acquisition Improvements are to be owned and operated by the Local Agency, and the financing is to be accomplished through a community facilities district which will be administered by the Authority under and pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 – California Government Code Sections 53311 and following (the “Act”).

On [__________], 20[_], the Local Agency entered into a Joint Community Facilities Agreement authorizing the Authority to form a community facilities district (the “District”) within the territorial limits of the Local Agency to finance, among other things, the Acquisition Improvements. On [__________], 20[_], the Authority formed the District and, on the same date, a landowner election was conducted in which all of the votes were cast unanimously in favor of conferring the District authority on the Authority Commission.] [For Assessment Districts:][The Acquisition Improvements are to be owned and operated by the Local Agency, and the financing is to be accomplished through an assessment district (the “District”) which will be administered by the Authority under and pursuant to Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Streets and Highways Code Sections 10000 and following) (the “1913 Act”) and the issuance of improvement bonds (the “Local Obligations”) under the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 (Streets and Highways Code Sections 8500 and following) (the “1915 Act” and, together with the “1913 Act” the “Act”).] D. The administration, payment and reimbursement of the capital facilities fees is agreed to be governed by the provisions of the SCIP Manual of Procedures as it may be amended from time to time. The administration, payment and reimbursement of the Acquisition Improvements shall be as provided herein.

E. Under SCIP, the Authority intends to levy [assessments] [special taxes] and issue bonds, in one or more series, to fund, among other things, all or a portion of the costs of the Acquisition Improvements. The portion of the proceeds of the [special taxes and] bonds allocable to the cost of the Acquisition Improvements, together with interest earned thereon, is referred to herein as the “Available Amount”.

F. The Authority will provide financing for the acquisition by the Local Agency of the Acquisition Improvements and the payment of the Acquisition Price (as defined herein) of the Acquisition Improvements from the Available Amount. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a description of the Acquisition Improvements, which includes authorized discrete and usable portions, if any, of the public capital improvements, [pursuant to Section 53313.51 of the Act,] to

Page 30 of 47 ends

B-3 4155-8093-8767.14

be acquired from the Developer.

G. The parties anticipate that, upon completion of the Acquisition Improvements and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Local Agency will acquire such completed Acquisition Improvements with the Available Amount.

H. Any and all monetary obligations of the Local Agency arising out of this Agreement are the special and limited obligations of the Local Agency payable only from the Available Amount, and no other funds whatsoever of the Local Agency shall be obligated therefor.

I. Attached to this Agreement are Exhibit A (Acquisition Improvements and the Eligible Portions thereof) and Exhibit B (Form of Requisition), which are incorporated into this Agreement for all purposes.

In consideration of Recitals A through I, inclusive, and the mutual covenants, undertakings and obligations set forth below, the Local Agency and the Developer agree as stated below.

Agreement

ARTICLE I

DEFINITIONS; DISTRICT FORMATION AND

FINANCING PLAN
Section 1.01. Definitions. As used herein, the following capitalized terms shall have the meanings ascribed to them below:
“Acceptable Title” means free and clear of all monetary liens, encumbrances, assessments, whether any such item is recorded or unrecorded, and taxes, except those items which are reasonably determined by the Local Agency Engineer not to interfere with the intended use and therefore are not required to be cleared from the title. “Acquisition and Construction Fund” means the “City of Bellflower Acquisition and Construction Fund” established by the Authority pursuant to Section 1.03 hereof for the purpose of paying the Acquisition Price of the Acquisition Improvements and which fund may be held as a subaccount within a fund established under the Authority Trust Agreement and may be commingled with acquisition and construction fund monies available for other public capital improvements.
“Acquisition Improvement” shall have the meaning assigned to such term in the recitals and are further described in Exhibit A.
“Acquisition Price” means the total amount eligible to be paid to the Developer upon acquisition of an Acquisition Improvement as provided in Section 2.03 not to exceed the Actual Cost of the Acquisition Improvement.
“Act” has the meaning ascribed thereto in Recital C.

Page 31 of 47 ends

B-4 4155-8093-8767.14

“Actual Cost” means the total cost of an Acquisition Improvement, as documented by the Developer to the satisfaction of the Local Agency and as certified by the Local Agency Engineer in an Actual Cost Certificate including, without limitation, (a) the Developer’s cost of constructing such Acquisition Improvement including grading, labor, material and equipment costs, (b) the Developer’s cost of designing and engineering the Acquisition Improvement, preparing the plans and specifications and bid documents for such Acquisition Improvement, and the costs of inspection, materials testing and construction staking for such Acquisition Improvement, (c) the Developer’s cost of any performance, payment and maintenance bonds and insurance, including title insurance, required hereby for such Acquisition Improvement, (d) the Developer’s cost of any real property or interest therein that is either necessary for the construction of such Acquisition Improvement (e.g., temporary construction easements, haul roads, etc.), or is required to be conveyed with such Acquisition Improvement in order to convey Acceptable Title thereto to the Local Agency or its designee, (e) the Developer’s cost of environmental evaluation or mitigation required for such Acquisition Improvement, (f) the amount of any fees actually paid by the Developer to governmental agencies in order to obtain permits, licenses or other necessary governmental approvals and reviews for such Acquisition Improvement, (g) the Developer’s cost for construction and project management, administration and supervision services for such Acquisition Improvement, (h) the Developer’s cost for professional services related to such Acquisition Improvement, including engineering, accounting, legal, financial, appraisal and similar professional services, and (i) the costs of construction financing incurred by the Developer with respect to such Acquisition Improvement.
“Actual Cost Certificate” means a certificate prepared by the Developer detailing the Actual Cost of an Acquisition Improvement, or an Eligible Portion thereof, to be acquired hereunder, as may be revised by the Local Agency Engineer pursuant to Section 2.03. “Agreement” means this Acquisition Agreement, dated as of [_______________], 20[_]. “Authority” means the California Statewide Communities Development Authority. “Authority Trust Agreement” means a Trust Agreement entered into by the Authority and an Authority Trustee in connection with the issuance of bonds. “Authority Trustee” means the financial institution identified as trustee in an Authority Trust Agreement.
“Available Amount” shall have the meaning assigned to the term in Recital E. “Bonds” means bonds or other indebtedness issued by the Authority as tax-exempt or taxable bonds or other indebtedness, in one or more series, that is to be repaid by the District. “Code” means the Streets and Highways Code or the Government Code of the State of California, as applicable.
“Developer” means [Developer], its successors and assigns. “Disbursement Request Form” means a requisition for payment of funds from the Acquisition and Construction Fund for an Acquisition Improvement, or an Eligible Portion thereof

Page 32 of 47 ends

B-5 4155-8093-8767.14

in substantially the form contained in Exhibit B hereto. “District” shall have the meaning assigned to the term in Recital C. “Eligible Portion” shall have the meaning ascribed to it in Section 2.03 below. “Installment Payment” means an amount equal to ninety percent (90%) of the Actual Cost of an Eligible Portion.
“Local Agency” means the City of Bellflower.
“Local Agency Engineer” means the Engineer of the Local Agency or his/her designee who will be responsible for administering the acquisition of the Acquisition Improvements hereunder.
“Project” means the Developer’s development of the property in the District, including the design and construction of the Acquisition Improvements and the other public and private improvements to be constructed by the Developer within the District. [“Special Taxes” means annual special taxes, and prepayments thereof, authorized by the District to be levied by the Commission of the Authority.] “Title Documents” means, for each Acquisition Improvement acquired hereunder, a grant deed or similar instrument necessary to transfer title to any real property or interests therein (including easements), or an irrevocable offer of dedication of such real property with interests therein necessary to the operation, maintenance, rehabilitation and improvement by the Local Agency of the Acquisition Improvement (including, if necessary, easements for ingress and egress) and a bill of sale or similar instrument evidencing transfer of title to the Acquisition Improvement (other than said real property interests) to the Local Agency, where applicable.

Section 1.02. Participation in SCIP. The Local Agency has adopted a resolution authorizing the Authority to accept applications from time to time of developers within the Local Agency’s jurisdictional boundaries. Developer has applied for financing through SCIP of the Acquisition Improvements, and such application has been approved by the Local Agency. [For CFDs:][The terms of a joint community facilities agreement identifying the Acquisition Improvements and the terms and conditions for the District were embodied within the Local Agency Resolution and were accepted by the Authority with respect to the District.] Developer and Local Agency agree that until and unless such financing is completed by the Authority and the Available Amount is deposited in the Acquisition and Construction Fund (as defined in Section

1.03 below), neither the Developer nor the Local Agency shall have any obligations under this Agreement. Developer agrees to cooperate with the Local Agency and the Authority in the completion of SCIP financing for the Acquisition Improvements.

Section 1.03. Deposit and Use of Available Amount.
(a) Upon completion of the SCIP financing, the Available Amount will be deposited by the Authority in the Acquisition and Construction Fund.

Page 33 of 47 ends

B-6 4155-8093-8767.14

(b) The Authority will cause the Authority Trustee to establish and maintain an account (the “Acquisition and Construction Fund”) for the purpose of holding all funds for the Acquisition Improvements. All earnings on amounts in the Acquisition and Construction Fund shall remain in the Acquisition and Construction Fund for use as provided herein and pursuant to the Authority Trust Agreement. Money in the Acquisition and Construction Fund shall be available to respond to delivery of a Disbursement Request Form and to be paid to the Developer or its designee to pay the Acquisition Price of the Acquisition Improvements, as specified in Article II hereof. Upon completion of all of the Acquisition Improvements and the payment of all costs thereof, any remaining funds in the Acquisition and Construction Fund (less any amount determined by the Local Agency as necessary to reserve for claims against the account) (i) shall be applied to pay the costs of any additional Acquisition Improvements eligible for acquisition with respect to the Project as approved by the Authority and, to the extent not so used, (ii) shall be applied by the Authority [to call Bonds or to reduce Special Taxes as the Authority shall determine][as provided in Section 10427.1 of the Code to pay a portion of the assessments levied on the Project property in the District].

Section 1.04. No Local Agency Liability; Local Agency Discretion; No Effect on Other Agreements. In no event shall any actual or alleged act by the Local Agency or any actual or alleged omission or failure to act by the Local Agency with respect to SCIP subject the Local Agency to monetary liability therefor. Further, nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as affecting the Developer’s or the Local Agency’s duty to perform their respective obligations under any other agreements, public improvement standards, land use regulations or subdivision requirements related to the Project, which obligations are and shall remain independent of the Developer’s and the Local Agency’s rights and obligations under this Agreement.

ARTICLE II

DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND ACQUISITION OF ACQUISITION IMPROVEMENTS Section 2.01. Letting and Administering Design Contracts. The parties presently anticipate that the Developer has awarded and administered or will award and administer engineering design contracts for the Acquisition Improvements to be acquired from Developer.

All eligible expenditures of the Developer for design engineering and related costs in connection with the Acquisition Improvements (whether as an advance to the Local Agency or directly to the design consultant) shall be reimbursed at the time of acquisition of such Acquisition Improvements. The Developer shall be entitled to reimbursement for any design costs of the Acquisition Improvements only out of the Acquisition Price as provided in Section 2.03 and shall not be entitled to any payment for design costs independent of or prior to the acquisition o f Acquisition Improvements.

Section 2.02. Letting and Administration of Construction Contracts; Indemnification. State law requires that all Acquisition Improvements not completed prior to the formation of the District shall be constructed as if they were constructed under the direction and supervision, or under the authority, of the Local Agency. In order to assure compliance with those provisions, except for any contracts entered into prior to the date hereof, Developer agrees to comply with any applicable requirements of the Local Agency with respect to the bidding and contracting for the construction of the Acquisition Improvements. The Developer agrees that all

Page 34 of 47 ends

B-7 4155-8093-8767.14

the contracts shall call for payment of prevailing wages as required by the Labor Code of the State of California. The Developer’s indemnification obligation set forth in Section 3.01 of this Agreement shall also apply to any alleged failure to comply with the requirements of this Section, and/or applicable State laws regarding public contracting and prevailing wages.

Section 2.03. Sale of Acquisition Improvements. The Developer agrees to sell to the Local Agency each Acquisition Improvement to be constructed by Developer (including any rights-of-way or other easements necessary for the Acquisition Improvements, to the extent not already publicly owned), when the Acquisition Improvement has been constructed and is complete to the satisfaction of the Local Agency for an amount not to exceed the lesser of (i) the Available Amount or (ii) the Actual Cost of the Acquisition Improvement. Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein, contains a list of the Acquisition Improvements. Portions of an Acquisition Improvement eligible for Installment Payments prior to completion of the entire Acquisition Improvement are described as eligible, discrete and usable portions in Exhibit A (each, an “Eligible Portion”). At the time of completion of each Acquisition Improvement, or Eligible Portion thereof, the Developer shall deliver to the Local Agency Engineer a written request for acquisition, accompanied by an Actual Cost Certificate, and by executed Title Documents for the transfer of the Acquisition Improvement where necessary. In the event that the Local Agency Engineer finds that the supporting paperwork submitted by the Developer fails to demonstrate the required relationship between the subject Actual Cost and eligible work, the Local Agency Engineer shall advise the Developer that the determination of the Actual Cost (or the ineligible portion thereof) has been disallowed and shall request further documentation from the Developer. If the further documentation is still not adequate, the Local Agency Engineer may revise the Actual Cost Certificate to delete any disallowed items and the determination shall be final and conclusive.

Certain soft costs for the Acquisition Improvements, such as civil engineering, may have been incurred pursuant to single contracts that include work relating also to the private portions of the Project. In those instances, the total costs under such cont racts will be allocated to each Acquisition Improvement as approved by the Local Agency Engineer. Where a specific contract has been awarded for design or engineering work relating solely to an Acquisition Improvement, one hundred percent (100%) of the costs under the contract will be allocated to that Acquisition Improvement. Amounts allocated to an Acquisition Improvement will be further allocated among the Eligible Portions of that Acquisition Improvement, if any, in the same proportion as the amount to be reimbursed for hard costs for each Eligible Portion bears to the amount to be reimbursed for hard costs for the entire Acquisition Improvement. Costs will be allocated to each Acquisition Improvement as approved by the Local Agency Engineer. The costs of certain environmental mitigation required to mitigate impacts of the public and private portions of the Project will be allocated to each Acquisition Improvement as approved by the Local Agency Engineer.

In the event that the Actual Cost is in excess of the Available Amount, the Local Agency shall withdraw the Available Amount from the Acquisition and Construction Fund and transfer said amount to the Developer. In the event that the Actual Cost is less than the Available Amount, the Local Agency shall withdraw an amount from the Acquisition and Construction Fund equal to the Actual Cost, and shall transfer said amount to the Developer. Any amounts then remaining in the Acquisition and Construction Fund shall be applied as provided in Section 1.03.

In no event shall the Local Agency be required to pay the Developer more than the amount

Page 35 of 47 ends

B-8 4155-8093-8767.14

on deposit in the Acquisition and Construction Fund at the time such payment is requested.

Section 2.04. Conditions Precedent to Payment of Acquisition Price. Payment to the Developer or its designee of the Acquisition Price for an Acquisition Improvement from the Acquisition and Construction Fund shall in every case be conditioned first upon the determination of the Local Agency Engineer, pursuant to Section 2.03, that the Acquisition Improvement satisfies all Local Agency regulations and ordinances and is otherwise complete and ready for acceptance by the Local Agency, and shall be further conditioned upon satisfaction of the following additional conditions precedent:
(a) The Developer shall have provided the Local Agency with lien releases or other similar documentation satisfactory to the Local Agency Engineer as evidence that none of the property (including any rights-of-way or other easements necessary for the operation and maintenance of the Acquisition Improvement, to the extent not already publicly owned) comprising the Acquisition Improvement, and the property which is subject to the [assessments/Special Taxes] of the District, is not subject to any prospective mechanics lien claim respecting the Acquisition Improvements.
(b) All due and payable property taxes, and installments of [assessments/Special Taxes] shall be current on property owned by the Developer or under option to the Developer that is subject to the lien of the District. (c) The Developer shall certify that it is not in default with respect to any loan secured by any interest in the Project.
(d) The Developer shall have provided the Local Agency with Title Documents needed to provide the Local Agency with title to the site, right-of-way, or easement upon which the subject Acquisition Improvements are situated. All such Title Documents shall be in a form acceptable to the Local Agency (or applicable governmental agency) and shall convey Acceptable Title. The Developer shall provide a policy of title insurance as of the date of transfer in a form acceptable to the Local Agency Engineer insuring the Local Agency as to the interests acquired in connection with the acquisition of any interest for which such a policy of title insurance is not required by another agreement between the Local Agency and the Developer. Each title insurance policy required hereunder shall be in the amount equal to or greater than the Acquisition Price.

Section 2.05. SCIP Requisition. Upon a determination by the Local Agency Engineer to pay the Acquisition Price of the Acquisition Improvements pursuant to Section 2.04, the Local Agency Engineer shall cause a SCIP Requisition to be submitted to the Program Administrator. The Program Administrator will review the SCIP Requisition and forward it with instructions to the Authority Trustee and the Authority Trustee shall make payment directly to the Developer of such amount pursuant to the Authority Trust Agreement. The Local Agency and the Developer acknowledge and agree that the Authority Trustee shall make payment strictly in accordance with the SCIP Requisition and shall not be required to determine whether or not the Acquisition Improvements have been completed or what the Actual Costs may be with respect to such Acquisition Improvements. The Authority Trustee shall be entitled to rely on the SCIP Requisition on its face without any further duty of investigation.

Page 36 of 47 ends

B-9 4155-8093-8767.14

ARTICLE III

MISCELLANEOUS
Section 3.01. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. The Developer hereby assumes the defense of, and indemnifies and saves harmless the Local Agency, the Authority, and each of its respective officers, directors, employees and agents, from and against all actions, damages, claims, losses or expenses of every type and description to which they may be subjected or put, by reason of, or resulting from or alleged to have resulted from the acts or omissions of the Developer or its agents and employees in the performance of this Agreement, or arising out of any contract for the design, engineering and construction of the Acquisition Improvements or arising out of any alleged misstatements of fact or alleged omission of a material fact made by the Developer, its officers, directors, employees or agents to the Authority's underwriter, financial advisor, appraiser, district engineer or bond counsel or regarding the Developer, its proposed developments, its property ownership and its contractual arrangements contained in the official statement relating to the SCIP financing (provided that the Developer shall have been furnished a copy of such official statement and shall not have objected thereto); and provided, further, that nothing in this Section 3.01 shall limit in any manner the Local Agency’s rights against any of the Developer’s architects, engineers, contractors or other consultants. Except as set forth in this Section 3.01, no provision of this Agreement shall in any way limit the extent of the responsibility of the Developer for payment of damages resulting from the operations of the Developer, its agents and employees. Nothing in this Section 3.01 shall be understood or construed to mean that the Developer agrees to indemnify the Local Agency, the Authority or any of its respective officers, directors, employees or agents, for any negligent or wrongful acts or omissions to act of the Local Agency, Authority, its officers, employees, agents or any consultants or contractors.

Section 3.02. Audit. The Local Agency shall have the right, during normal business hours and upon the giving of ten days’ written notice to the Developer, to review all books and records of the Developer pertaining to costs and expenses incurred by the Developer (for which the Developer seeks reimbursement) in constructing the Acquisition Improvements.

Section 3.03. Cooperation. The Local Agency and the Developer agree to cooperate with respect to the completion of the SCIP financing for the Acquisition Improvements.

The Local Agency and the Developer agree to meet in good faith to resolve any differences on future matters which are not specifically covered by this Agreement.

Section 3.04. General Standard of Reasonableness. Any provision of this Agreement which requires the consent, approval or acceptance of either party hereto or any of their respective employees, officers or agents shall be deemed to require that such consent, approval or acceptance not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, unless such provision expressly incorporates a different standard. The foregoing provision shall not apply to provisions in the Agreement which provide for decisions to be in the sole discretion of the party making the decision.

Section 3.05. Third Party Beneficiaries. The Authority and its officers, employees, agents or any consultants or contractors are expressly deemed third party beneficiaries of this Agreement with respect to the provisions of Section 3.01. It is expressly agreed that, except for the Authority with respect to the provisions of Section 3.01, there are no third party

Page 37 of 47 ends

B-10 4155-8093-8767.14

beneficiaries of this Agreement, including without limitation any owners of bonds, any of the Local Agency’s or the Developer’s contractors for the Acquisition Improvements and any of the Local Agency’s, the Authority's or the Developer’s agents and employees.

Section 3.06. Conflict with Other Agreements. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as releasing the Developer or the Local Agency from any condition of development or requirement imposed by any other agreement between the Local Agency and the Developer, and, in the event of a conflicting provision, such other agreement shall prevail unless such conflicting provision is specifically waived or modified in writing by the Local Agency and the Developer.

Section 3.07. Notices. All invoices for payment, reports, other communication and notices relating to this Agreement shall be delivered (via mail or electronic mail) to:

If to the Local Agency:

City of Bellflower
[Address to come]
[Email to come]
If to the Developer:
[Developer]
[Address to come]
[Email to come]
Either party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party.

Section 3.08. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is held to be illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall be given effect to the fullest extent reasonably possible.

Section 3.09. Governing Law. This Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

Section 3.10. Waiver. Failure by a party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other party, or the failure by a party to exercise its rights upon the default of the other party, shall not constitute a waiver of such party’s right to insist and demand strict compliance by the other party with the terms of this Agreement.

Section 3.11. Singular and Plural; Gender. As used herein, the singular of any word includes the plural, and terms in the masculine gender shall include the feminine.

Section 3.12. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original.

Page 38 of 47 ends

B-11 4155-8093-8767.14

Section 3.13. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement is binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors-in-interest of the parties hereto. The Developer may not assign its rights or obligations hereunder, except to successors-in-interest to the property within the District, without the prior written consent of the Local Agency.

Section 3.14. Remedies in General. It is acknowledged by the parties that the Local Agency would not have entered into this Agreement if it were to be liable in damages under or with respect to this Agreement or the application thereof, other than for the payment to the Developer of any (i) moneys owing to the Developer hereunder, or (ii) moneys paid by the Developer pursuant to the provisions hereof which are misappropriated or improperly obtained, withheld or applied by the Local Agency.

In general, each of the parties hereto may pursue any remedy at law or equity available for the Breach of any provision of this Agreement, except that the Local Agency shall not be liable in damages to the Developer, or to any assignee or transferee of the Developer other than for the payments to the Developer specified in the preceding paragraph. Subject to the foregoing, the Developer covenants not to sue for or claim any damages for any alleged Breach of, or dispute which arises out of, this Agreement.

[The remainder of this page intentionally left blank]

Page 39 of 47 ends

B-12 4155-8093-8767.14

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year written above.

CITY OF BELLFLOWER
By:

Authorized Signatory

[DEVELOPER],
a [here indicate type of legal entity]
By:

Signature

Print Name

Page 40 of 47 ends

4155-8093-8767.14

Exhibit A to the Acquisition Agreement

ACQUISITION IMPROVEMENTS AND THE ELIGIBLE PORTIONS THEREOF

[To be completed based on Final Engineer’s Report/developer’s budget and cash flows]

Funding includes amounts for incidental costs associated with the capital improvements, including, but not limited to, contingency, design, engineering, and construction management.

ACQUISITION IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL AMOUNT*
[_] ............................................................................................................. $[_] [_] ............................................................................................................. $[_]

* Estimated. Acquisition Price will be determined based on Actual Cost as further described in this Acquisition Agreement.

Page 41 of 47 ends

4155-8093-8767.14

Exhibit B to the Acquisition Agreement

FORM OF REQUISITION
To: BLX Group LLC
SCIP Program Administrator
355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2700
Los Angeles, California 90071
Attention: Vo Nguyen
Fax: 213-612-2499
Re: Statewide Community Infrastructure Program
The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of the CITY OF BELLFLOWER hereby requests a withdrawal from the [DEVELOPER] ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION FUND, as follows:

Request Date: [Insert Date of Request]
Name of Developer: [Developer]
Withdrawal Amount: [Insert Acquisition Price]
Acquisition Improvements: [Insert Description of Acquisition Improvement(s) from Ex. A] Payment Instructions: [Insert Wire Instructions or Payment Address for Developer] The undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

1. The Withdrawal is being made in accordance with a permitted use of such monies pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement, and the Withdrawal is not being made for the purpose of reinvestment.

2. None of the items for which payment is requested have been reimbursed previously from other sources of funds.

3. If the Withdrawal Amount is greater than the funds held in the Acquisition and Construction Fund, the SCIP Program Administrator is authorized to amend the amount requested to be equal to the amount of such funds.

CITY OF BELLFLOWER
By:

Title:

Page 42 of 47 ends

4155-8093-8767.14

CERTIFICATION OF RESOLUTION
I, the undersigned, the duly appointed and qualified City Clerk of the City of Bellflower, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ___________ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Bellflower duly and regularly held at the regular meeting place thereof on the 10th day of August, 2026, of which meeting all of the members of said City Council had due notice and at which a majority thereof were present.

An agenda of said meeting was posted at least 72 hours before said meeting at Bellflower City Hall, 16600 Civic Center Drive, Bellflower, CA 90706, a location freely accessible to members of the public, and a brief description of said resolution appeared on said agenda.

Notice of public hearing was published in Los Cerritos Community Newspaper at least 5 days prior to the hearing.

Said resolution has not been amended, modified or rescinded since the date of its adoption and the same is now in full force and effect.

Dated: _______________, 20__
_________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Bellflower

By: ______________________________

Seal

Page 43 of 47 ends

A-1
4155-8093-8767.14

EXHIBIT A TO THE RESOLUTION

FORM OF RESOLUTION OF INTENTION

TO BE ADOPTED BY CSCDA
For Assessment Districts Only
RESOLUTION NO. __SCIP-

RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE

COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO FINANCE CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR THE PAYMENT OF DEVELOPMENT RELATED

FEES FOR PUBLIC CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PROPOSED

STATEWIDE COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. ___ ([NAME OF PROJECT]) CITY OF BELLFLOWER, COUNTY OF [___], APPROVING A PROPOSED BOUNDARY MAP, MAKING

CERTAIN DECLARATIONS, FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS

CONCERNING RELATED MATTERS, AND AUTHORIZING RELATED

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct.

Section 2. Pursuant to Section 2961 of the Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 (the “1931 Act”), being Division 4 (commencing with Section 2800) of the

Page 44 of 47 ends

A-2
4155-8093-8767.14

Code, the Commission hereby declares its intent to comply with the requirements of the 1931 Act by complying with Part 7.5 thereof.

Section 8. The procedure for the collection of assessments and advance retirement of bonds under the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 shall be as provided in Part 11.1 thereof.

Page 45 of 47 ends

A-3
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority this ___ day of ______, 20__.

By
Authorized Signatory
California Statewide Communities
Development Authority

Page 46 of 47 ends

4155-8093-8767.14

EXHIBIT A TO THE RESOLUTION OF INTENTION

PAYMENT OF IMPACT FEES, CAPACITY FEES AND/OR OTHER DEVELOPMENT

RELATED CHARGES

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS*

Page 47 of 47 ends

GS�Y OF BELLFLOWER
cR
°WING TOGS
staff
eport
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
ATTENTION: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
FROM: Elizabeth C. Oba, Director of Planning and Building Services Alexander Salgado, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to receive, file and provide direction on the conceptual Arts District Overlay Zone (ADOZ).

DATE: August 10, 2026

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City Council continues to look for options to bring life to the vacant and underused properties along Clark Avenue between Alondra Boulevard and Flower Street (the "corridor"). Per the Council's previous direction, Planning staff worked with De Novo Planning Group ("De Novo") to develop a conceptual Arts District Overlay Zone ("ADOZ") that would give this stretch of Clark Avenue a new set of zoning rules built around arts, culture, and small-scale local business. Based upon the City Council's actions tonight, a draft ordinance would be prepared to implement the ADOZ. Among other things, such regulations would identify which businesses are allowed, how new and rehabilitated buildings should look from the sidewalk, and how residents could live and work in the same space. This approach would advance the City's larger goals of drawing private investment back to the corridor, adding housing choices, and making arts and culture a visible part of everyday life in Bellflower.

The Overlay would be entirely voluntary; a property owner may choose to develop under the new arts -district rules, but no owner has to. Owners who do not opt in would keep their current zoning unchanged. This report explains the trade-off the overlay offers property owners which includes more flexibility and faster, cheaper approvals in exchange for design and use standards that build a coherent arts district. It also highlights the policy choices the Council should weigh before the overlay moves forward.

RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
1) Receive, file, and provide direction regarding the conceptual ADOZ; or 2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

Page 1 of 7 ends

-1-

Staff Report — Study Session — Arts District
August 10, 2026

Page 2 of 7 ends

FISCAL IMPACT
Receiving and filing this report has no fiscal impact. If the Council later directs staff to carry out specific programs, those programs may carry their own costs, which staff will evaluate as part of those discussions.

BACKGROUND
On both sides of Clark Avenue between Alondra Boulevard and Flower Street, many commercial and office spaces sit vacant or underused; a number of them are legal non -conforming buildings that no longer match current zoning. As part of its work to revitalize commercial corridors and create distinctive housing options, the City Council explored building an Arts District here to spur redevelopment and bring art -focused events, spaces, and programs into the community.

Between November 2022 and July 2023, the City prepared an Arts District Study (the "Study") to weigh options for creating an Arts District and expanding arts programming.

The Study looked at two areas along Clark Avenue: Area 1, from Alondra Boulevard south to Oak Street, and Area 2, from Flower Street south to Rose Street. It found Area 1 to be the most walkable part of the corridor, with a cluster of small, legal non -conforming commercial and office buildings marked by ongoing vacancies and deferred maintenance.

Because these buildings sit on shallow lots, the Study recommended rehabilitating, re -tenanting, and repurposing them for mixed use rather than tearing them down. Area 2, holds larger, mostly occupied commercial and industrial parcels that respond more to market forces than to City policy. The Study therefore recommended concentrating early efforts on Area 1. Following City Council direction during the July 10, 2023 study session, staff began the initial steps into preparing an Arts District Overlay Zone on Clark Avenue between Alondra Boulevard and Flower Street.

Consistent with that direction, in 2024 the City's consultant at the time conducted community outreach, including outreach at the Summer Street Fests and Farmers Market events and through an online survey shared on the City's website and social media. The eight -question survey asked about the community's interest in arts uses along Clark Avenue and in citywide public art. 281 people responded, and a large majority supported both creating an Arts District and expanding public art across the city.

The Study was a policy and feasibility assessment, not a set of enforceable rules. To turn its concepts into an ordinance the City can adopt, and to independently test its conclusions, the City sought a firm with expertise in land use planning, zoning code drafting, and California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") review. On August 11, 2025, the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute Agreement File No. 805.2 with De Novo to help draft conceptual regulations including a General Plan Amendment and CEQA review.
-2-

Staff Report — Study Session — Arts District
August 10, 2026

Page 3 ends

De Novo completed the foundational work under the Agreement, including a June 2026 Case Study Memorandum reviewing three comparable arts districts (Attachment C) and drafted potential zoning regulations (that are still being reviewed) for properties along Clark Avenue between Alondra Boulevard and Oak Street (Attachment A). Staff recommends moving the overlay's southern boundary from Oak Street to Flower Street so that Simms Park can anchor future arts programming and community events. De Novo also studied Clark Avenue from Flower Street to the southern city border and concluded that this segment does not suit the ADOZ, for three reasons.

First, part of the south corridor already falls under the Housing Opportunity Overlay Zone, so a second overlay would duplicate rules already in place. Second, the area's largely commercial and industrial character lacks the smaller, walkable, convertible storefronts an arts district depends on, leaving little room for the infill, adaptive reuse, and cohesive design the district needs. Third, Simms Park gives the district a natural southern edge and gateway, supporting a unified approach to identity, signage, and streetscape. Staff therefore recommends setting the district's southern boundary at Flower Street and leaving out the segment between Flower Street and Rose Street. Because the overlay would allow residential and live/work uses in places where they are not permitted today, adopting it will also require an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element, which staff would prepare if directed by the City Council.

DISCUSSION

1. How the Overlay Works
The ADOZ concept is a voluntary set of zoning rules layered on top of the corridor's existing base zoning. A property owner may elect to develop under the overlay in place of the base zoning, but the choice is the owner's alone. Without opting in, property owners are subject to the existing zoning. For an owner who does opt in, the overlay's rules control wherever they differ from the base zoning, even where the overlay is more permissive, so a single, predictable framework governs the project. Where the overlay says nothing about a particular subject, the City's standard code and the underlying zoning still apply. This design is the central policy feature of the overlay: it lets the City set a clear vision for the corridor while leaving each owner free to decide whether the arts -district path fits their property. The City Council previously implemented the CENTZ (in 2019) and the DAZL (in 2020). Much like the ADOZ, these overlay zones must be activated by an applicant, i.e., an owner must opt in for the zoning overlay. Absent such application, the underlying zoning remains.

The ADOZ is designed to make the arts -district path the easier and faster one. Small projects, including urban infill, the reuse of existing buildings, and new construction under 10,000 square feet would be prioritized for streamlined environmental review under CEQA, which should shorten timelines and reduce cost for the modest, incremental projects the corridor needs.
-3-

Staff Report — Study Session — Arts District
August 10, 2026

Page 4 of 7 ends

2. Permitted Uses
The overlay includes an expanded, arts -focused list of businesses that may operate along the corridor. Alongside anything already allowed in the base zone, the overlay welcomes creative and neighborhood -serving uses such as art galleries, studios, art schools, photography and recording studios, small indoor makers, craft and supply stores, bookstores, florists, cafes, bakeries, and ice cream parlors. Most of these uses would be allowed by -right, meaning an owner may open them without a discretionary permit. A smaller group of higher -intensity uses, such as makerspaces, breweries, larger museums and theaters, and performance venues, would require an administrative or conditional use permit so the City can review parking, noise, hours, and similar neighborhood effects before they open.

This use list is meant supports a "maker economy," where goods are produced and sold in the same place, and it closely tracks the businesses residents said they wanted through the community survey — galleries, coffee shops, music and fabric stores, craft stores, restaurants, dance studios, and bookstores. A few practical safeguards keep these uses compatible with their neighbors: small-scale manufacturing must stay under 5,000 square feet and occur entirely indoors, and recording studios must meet an interior noise limit to protect any attached homes. Uses that are not on the list are not allowed unless the Planning Director determines a proposed use is substantially similar to a listed one and fits the district's purpose, which gives the City room to adapt as new creative business types emerge without reopening the ordinance.

3. Live/Work Units
The overlay allows live/work units, a single space where a resident both lives and runs a creative business. This is one of the overlay's most significant policy moves, because it introduces housing into a portion of the corridor where residential use is not permitted today, and it does so in a form tailored to artists and makers. Live/work units would not be capped by the base zone's residential density limits, which gives owners flexibility to add homes as part of a creative enterprise rather than as stand-alone apartments.

The rules keep these units functioning as true live/work space, rather than housing in disguise. Each unit must be at least 750 square feet, with a defined share of the space set aside for the business and the rest for living. The person living in the unit must be the one operating the business, and the living and working portions may not be leased or sold separately. An operator may employ up to two people who live elsewhere, and hiring more would require additional review of traffic and parking. Before opening, an operator must submit a short Creative Operations Plan confirming the business fits the district's creative and artisan focus. Certain uses and activities that do not mix safely with homes, such as adult businesses, vehicle repair, and open -flame or hazardous work are off-limits in a live/work unit, with narrow exceptions available only after fire and Building Official's sign off. The result is a housing option that keeps the corridor active and creative while protecting the people who live there.
-4-

Staff Report — Study Session — Arts District
August 10, 2026

Page 5 of 7 ends

4. A Walkable, Active Street: Frontage and Design
Much of the overlay is aimed at what pedestrians experience at street level, because a successful arts district depends on an inviting, active sidewalk. New development would generally reserve the ground floor facing Clark Avenue for active, public -facing uses such as shops, studios, and galleries, keeping homes on upper floors or toward the rear. For live/work units, the workspace must sit at the front along Clark Avenue, with the living space behind or above it.

Design standards reinforce this street -facing character. Storefronts would sit close to the sidewalk, with a shallow front setback that pulls buildings up to the street edge and puts activity on display. At least 60 percent of the ground -floor street frontage must be clear glass so passersby can see the activity inside, and primary entrances must open directly onto the sidewalk. To keep the street feeling open and safe rather than fortified, the overlay prohibits visible exterior security bars and roll -down metal grates, while still allowing less intrusive security measures. These design standards are the ones most directly tied to the community's vision.

5. Building Size and Setbacks
The overlay adjusts basic building rules to fit the corridor's small, shallow lots and to encourage reinvestment. Buildings could rise up to three stories or 40 feet, there would be no minimum lot size, and a building could cover its entire lot. Front setbacks would be shallow to bring storefronts to the sidewalk, and side and rear setbacks would not be required, which helps owners make full use of tight parcels. These allowances matter in practice because many of the corridor buildings could not be rehabilitated or expanded under conventional setback and lot coverage regulations.

The overlay also invites the district to spill out into the public realm in ways that add life to the street. With an encroachment permit, features such as awnings, canopies, plant containers, parklets, sidewalk dining, and even chalk or mural surfaces could extend into the right-of-way. Outdoor sculpture and murals meant to be seen from the street would need no permit and would not have to meet setback rules, as long as the art is not an advertisement and does not block pedestrian, bicycle, or vehicle traffic. Together, these provisions treat the sidewalk as part of the district's canvas and lower the barriers to the small touches that give an arts district its identity.

6. Parking
Parking is often the single biggest obstacle to reusing older commercial buildings, and the overlay addresses it directly. A live/work unit would need just two off-street spaces total, covering both the home and the business. When an existing building changes to a permitted creative use, it would not have to add parking it never had. This is an important allowance for the corridor's small legacy storefronts. Mixed -use projects would receive an automatic parking reduction that reflects the way homes and shops use spaces at different times of day, and required parking could be located off -site nearby when it will not fit on the lot. Conventional parking requirements would otherwise block much of the reinvestment the City is trying to encourage.
-5-

Staff Report — Study Session — Arts District
August 10, 2026

Page 6 of 7 ends

7. Development Incentives and Concessions
To make opting in worthwhile, the overlay offers a set of specific incentives. Projects under 5,000 square feet that do not need a variance or conditional use permit would be approved administratively by the Planning Director, without the time and expense of Planning Commission and City Council hearings; larger projects would still go through the standard public hearing process. Owners who convert older buildings, generally those built before 2026, would receive relief from several modern standards, such as lot coverage limits and landscape buffer requirements, provided the building still meets all life -safety and building -code requirements. The overlay also extends the sidewalk allowances by letting eligible storefronts use up to three feet of the sidewalk for art displays, signage, or seating, as long as a clear four -foot walking path remains. Each of these incentives lowers a cost or delay that would otherwise discourage the small, incremental investment the corridor needs.

8. Related General Plan Amendment
Because the overlay would allow housing where they are not permitted today, adopting it requires a matching change to the General Plan. If directed by the City Council, staff will prepare an amendment to redesignate the affected portions of the corridor to Mixed -Use so the General Plan and the overlay align. Staff would bring the amendment forward together with the final overlay.
➢ Direction Requested
Staff requests the City Council's direction on the concepts discussed in this staff report so that proposed regulations may be prepared for public hearing. The ADOZ ordinance, in addition to the General Plan Amendment and the appropriate environmental document, will be first presented to the Planning Commission in a public hearing and the Planning Commission will make a recommendation to the City Council. The ADOZ will then be scheduled for a public hearing before the City Council for adoption.

ATTACHMENTS
A. ADOZ Summary 7
B. Arts District Overlay Map 10
C. De Novo Case Study Memo 11
-6-

Arts District Overlay (ADOZ)
Summary

1. Land Uses
What is allowed by right. Any use already permitted in the base zone may operate here.

Live/work units may operate, and a list of arts -oriented businesses may operate by right — galleries, studios, art and craft stores, cafes, restaurants, bakeries, photographic studios, and tattoo parlors, among others. Artisanal or micro -manufacturing may operate by right, but each business must stay under 5,000 square feet and must keep all production indoors.

What needs a discretionary permit. Some uses may operate only with Director - or Commission -level approval:
• Administrative Use Permit (staff review): micro -brewery, makerspace, restaurant serving alcohol, and small ( 5,000 sq ft) community centers, museums, and theaters.

What is prohibited. A use not on the list is prohibited unless the Nanning Director finds it similar in character, intensity, and impact to a listed use. Live/work units must not be combined with adult businesses or auto repair/detailing.

Live/work rules. A live/work unit must be at least 750 square feet, must devote 33-50% of its floor area to workspace, and must be occupied by the business operator. Up to two non-resident employees may work in the unit; three or more require a Conditional Use Permit.

Policy decision points. The use list is arts -focused and largely by -right, which speeds approvals but narrows flexibility. Council may want to decide (a) whether the <5,000 sq ft manufacturing cap and indoor -only rule fit the businesses it wants to attract, and (b) how much discretion to leave the Planning Director over unlisted uses.

2. Building Height
• Buildings must not exceed 3 stories or 40 feet, whichever is lower. • There is no minimum lot size.
• Lot coverage may reach 100%.

Policy decision points. Forty feet over three stories, combined with full lot coverage and no minimum lot size, allows dense, small -lot infill. Council may want to confirm this scale fits the low -intensity character the overlay's purpose describes, and whether upper -floor step -backs or transitions to adjacent homes are needed. 1 -T

3. Parking
How much parking a project must provide:
• Commercial: one space per 500 square feet of building area. • Live/work: a flat two spaces per unit, covering both the home and the business.

Flexibility the overlay grants:
• Required parking may sit off -site within 500 feet under a recorded agreement or lease.
• A change from an existing use to a permitted creative use is entitled to an exemption from providing any additional parking.
• A mixed -use project is entitled to an automatic 20% reduction in required spaces.

Driveways. Each parcel must provide either a 20 -foot -wide driveway or two 10 -foot driveways.

Policy decision points. The parking rules are deliberately lenient — reductions, exemptions, and off -site options all lower the barrier to reuse. Council may want to weigh this against on -street parking demand along Clark Avenue and decide whether the 20% mixed -use reduction and the change -of -use exemption should stack.

4. Desig
Ground -floor / streetscape:
• On Clark Avenue, the street -facing ground floor must be an active, non-residential use; residential units must sit upstairs or to the rear (except on Housing Element sites).
• At least 60% of the ground -floor facade between 2 and 7 feet above grade must be clear glass, and primary entrances must open onto the sidewalk.

Building placement:
• Buildings must sit at a 0- to 5 -foot front setback (a build -to line at the sidewalk); no side or rear setback is required.

Awnings and canopies may project up to 6 feet, eaves up to 1 foot, and light fixtures up to 2 feet into the right-of-way.

Security features:

Laminated security glass is encouraged; exterior scissor grilles, roll -up metal doors, and permanent exterior security bars are prohibited.

Public art and sidewalk life:
• Outdoor murals and sculpture need no permit and are exempt from setbacks, provided the art is not for sale, is not an advertisement, and does not block traffic. • Eligible businesses may use up to 3 feet of the sidewalk for display or seating, but must keep a 4 -foot clear pedestrian path.

Live/work design: ground -floor units must have a 12 -foot ceiling in the workspace, must provide at least 40 square feet of open space, and must place the primary entrance facing Clark Avenue.
2 -8

Adaptive reuse: converting a pre -2026 building to a creative or live/work use is exempt from current lot -coverage limits, and existing nonconforming setbacks are treated as conforming.

Policy decision points. The design rules push a continuous, transparent, pedestrian storefront wall at the sidewalk. Council may want to confirm that the mandatory active - ground -floor rule is workable on every block, and that the security -device prohibitions match business owners' safety concerns.
3 -9-

CJk-Wove ToC Votv0.

Paramoun t
Lon g Be ach
RA MGN �A PAR K

PROGRESS PA RK
"Down
Ir-r�1fltyRnrt'AC INenrer`Y. �t 1 af4r.-
'r(I
'0Il(/
r�• 4
/ r ,/44 4)711/1/1 IIIIN�
I 111',1
Alb K r �'Kte r ,, rotary Sthool •
D i ll 4
I�uJ
�lilNfl'1'I
)1l'l ''',i•1�I� ,
-LrWOOD�TS tI N I II fhlnetOrr ll•nr•nf ary?cfra• 4 't
•nk f Woadr
ll.11ll i .� • I+
a' 1NdHNIINHINI,"'
4dW1�41
IJu1(IN-. I IINIIn
f(I1t11I1
i v nra ry cn wt1Itl,N{IIII
�irl['11�'Yrflr7�� I
1111. It, tin
— -
III.'
11 Older LIDR RT MMN7
I 11141141111+ IlliiIIIIIIIf {'� eDffli riffs I OrrAT !r frnnl it 1' I l° 4IIHI'I'. III I1H INNINi 1 &III N'N IffHPfIfil -IiH l' I I ftH i IHi' 1111 ;N{ `I'fiMI tL_-==�ntntnt,luu1, l . I I� F I ill I I Il.1111111i,}f.l H111I.�iI-L . }Nl}}�µ'll l� �1 f I. I �1 ' 1(IIIIIIIIIII I �� - .u{IIINIHHIIi}il.k f I ! I!I'it I `�i II fti' �'rn r'-�IIHfI4NN�t414Ir {
nn ,n- II
Ili I lglyft!II I III' '1I . `1 li�l t�Iult:I uiL Ii 1i- 'k'fitihi! iliP 1'IIINiillHI'" NNN9d}j'I`illfl�fl i.

PALMS PARK I�+ r J r- Iriifl'llt a•I ry', t:',I.VrJt lNlifi i3, ,111 Jflllil V eT PA RK
n �Iu1t1t11WIL;
- I- "] �i�. Y I� 1 °mill„'f �'II;,�'!i� ``' k1 1411ll1 ,i lr �+1 7 Itl�rl_ ` t0 1,1 ri 4 Elam
IIII II'I,1111 ball!

II, III
III111'i11111 IIII;, III I!!I/
II1111111III ; II III /
j �
litl lil 11}il! II!;; IiI1+l011 - T II ((>u.

I. na nrtl ,IIII ,-� I II I�Illl! Sf +III1iI
T MAP It IItIt!Illti'
111
,Ilrnmrmrmr III
IW IULIIn11im. 4 I
Z LL111111. IIi 111111111111 _
rllll.!'. .11 Il 1111 '11/111
ti At_ _ ,/-1 -IIIlf�ffff,♦tf
ll-- III1.-I444ffflf'
IIIHIIffHHb
1NIMMliHI
erMlddie/Hkth I .>I,H1
-111I419414,t
11HHH+t11+t
I
AIJLft Slim
t I
�UII III III( 1, 11111 I 1 '�ll' l ' (II ��:�L�gI�i
t 1I.Innntlgt Ill(1 1' tllfi IIII Pilo,lrIn1J11
_� If'IlI IUII H i 111NI11 �I{IH+{�
i�tiHitfiUtinirr #11,,., • i,1..! flCiawrlk"
P111q 1HIN HUM! I fIIi f Lf' III¢11111Ht4 1fl? +i h{II+1�" In r'�I4i' r' tulnpl II• I111'J1111111y1
!e4""
Pwuier I
�1. ��...,. �_ 111Rn mT McDlltt I` fit
'TO dll, r. • ��[� 9�1111TIIf1l
Continuation N tic J 1N Ill r Ai r.

FrFmrt
t
l i l f Tr ',�w ire +{ I
I 111 :n ITI !lrld tf f -fit I , 11 1 11

1. I 11ff - PA K I
I
I
.,1Ill�jjjjjj`` I I I IIII I'f1J f l I' i in Ely`3rr st7eall'l111+• ' 'Illiil� `full � I I -I f 1I i 11I�IlI.�� I ! f �1j��f41,{I * f I ddi r I a I I� t y Illll ;l�yil l ,IIII II'I I -_ ` f�. � l t q ill I'I It ti• .ii l lilt≥ IIIIII Di'd 1 I! i 1t Lll_I4 t. 1111 I i IitJ I
3 P ARK
Norwalk
Cerritos
t3ELLPLoti,��
Arts District Overlay Map
I t I I 1
Scale: 1 in = 2035 ft
Print ed 8/6/2026

De Novo Planning Group
A Land Use Planning Design, and Environmental Firm
Draft Memorandum
Date:

To:

From:

Subject:

June 5, 2026
Elizabeth Oba, City of Bellflower
De Novo Planning Group
Bellflower Arts District Overlay, Case Studies
Ail • ■
Introduction
This memorandum supports the process to establish an Arts District within the City of Bellflower, generally along Clark Avenue between Oak Street and Alondra Boulevard. To provide a comprehensive regulatory framework for this initiative, this document analyzes three case studies:

1. Haynie's Corner (Evansville, Indiana)

2. South A Street/SOFA Art District (Santa Rosa, California)

3. Hapeville Arts District (Hapeville, Georgia)
By utilizing best practices from these municipalities, this memorandum outlines strategic applications tailored specifically for Bellflower.

Haynie's Corner
SOFA District
Hapeville Arts District
Corporate Office
1020 Suncast Lane, Suite 106
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
916.949.3231
Southern California
180 E Main Street, Suite 108
Tustin, CA 92780
714.453.7711
www.denovoDlanninc.com
infola�denovoolanninc.com
-11-

CASE STUDIES

1. Haynie's Corner, Evansville, Indiana
Adjacent to the Ohio River in downtown Evansville, Indiana, Haynie's Corner Arts District (District) is a creative community of four neighborhoods: Riverside, Culver, Goosetown, and Blackford's Grove.' The area's transformation was initially kickstarted in October 2006 when the City Council officially designated the area as the Haynie's Corner Arts District. This formal branding was specifically designed to attract artists to live and work in the area, fueling early private investment, gallery openings, and the restoration of historic properties to transition the district from a historically blighted area into a vibrant mixed -use neighborhood.

Evansville Arts Redevelopment Area Plan
In February 2010, the Evansville Redevelopment Commission published the Evansville Arts Redevelopment Area Plan, which focused on revitalizing an approximately 40-50 block area.2 Haynie Corner faced falling property values due to the disproportionate number of neglected rental properties, unmaintained infrastructure (utilities, sidewalks, and streets), and a lack of capital reinvestment. Since there was not a large, established arts community already present, the City recognized that to successfully execute the Haynie's Corner arts branding and convince artists to relocate there, they first needed to address the neighborhood's built environment. While attracting artists was an overarching economic goal, the primary objectives of the 2010 Plan focused strictly on comprehensive neighborhood revitalization through infrastructure and housing upgrades.

The Plan aimed to eliminate blighted,
substandard buildings and
environmental hazards while using
strict code enforcement to target
neglected rental, vacant, and
abandoned properties. It sought to
stabilize the community by
rehabilitating structures, infilling
vacant lots with new market -rate and
mixed -use developments, and
transitioning qualified renters into
homeowners.

To achieve these objectives, the Plan
directed the City to implement a
revitalization strategy categorized into
four core areas:
• Zoning and Design Controls: Explore form -based or overlay zoning options, establish strict design guidelines, and appoint a Design Review Committee to guide neighborhood aesthetics. • Financial and Property Incentives: Establish a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) district to fund public ' Haynie's Corner Arts District Association, Haynie's Corner Arts District, 2026. Available at: https: ha,niescorner.com Accessed May 27, 2026.
2 Evansville Redevelopment Commission, Evansville Arts Redevelopment Area, February 2010. Available at:
https://www.evansvilleaov.org/egov/documents/1500994268 48528.Ddf. Accessed June 1, 2026.

Wage
-12-

infrastructure. To attract and retain owner occupants, the City will offer targeted grants to Low to Moderate Income (LMI) residents, gap financing, interest rate buydowns, and free or discounted properties, while continuing to land bank unused parcels. • Community and Professional Partnerships: Mobilize a local volunteer corps, partner directly with building and design professionals, and secure corporate and university sponsorships to coordinate labor and material donations.
• Sustainable Rehabilitation: Launch a building material salvage program to reclaim, recycle, and reuse architectural elements from demolished structures.

Evansville Municipal Code Chapter 18.115, Arts Overlay Zone Soon after the Redevelopment Plan was published, Evansville passed the Arts Overlay Zone Ordinance in 2011.

The purpose of the Arts Overlay Zone (AOZ) is to:
"[...] facilitate investment involving improvements to land and structures within the district, while encouraging artistic and creative uses. The ADZ overlays properties already classified into existing zoning districts. The objective is to offer more flexibility in uses allowed
and development standards in the AOZ as
incentives for new development. The intended
result of the overlay is to help establish a mixed use
area with art -related businesses, other low
intensity, neighborhood -supporting businesses,
live/work units and traditional residences
integrated together in a manner that maintains the
residential character of the area. The AOZ uses an
innovative approach allowing artists and owners
and operators of support businesses to occupy
joint living and commercial space within the same
structure that would otherwise not be allowed in
many of the underlying zoning districts. The
creation of the A0Z promotes investment through
mixed use development that expands the presence
of and/or otherwise enhances the arts within the
zone."3
Geographically, the AOZ does not cover the entirety of Haynie's Corner. Instead, it functions as a targeted regulatory core positioned directly in the center of the district. While the broader Haynie's Corner area encompasses four historic residential neighborhoods, the strict legal boundaries of the AOZ are tightly drawn around the central commercial and mixed -use blocks immediately surrounding the intersection of Putnam, Adams, Jefferson, and Washington avenues.
3 City of Evansville, Evansville Municipal Code Chapter 18.115, Arts Overlay Zone, 2026. Available at:
https://www.codeoublishing.comilN/Evansville/html/Evansville18/Evansvi Ie18115.html#18.115.020. Accessed May 28, 2026.
3IPage
-13-

The AOZ is divided into three distinct areas:
• Residential live/work area. Encompassing the eastern portion of the zone, this area features the lowest intensity of commercial activity to preserve its traditional neighborhood character. Non-residential activities are strictly limited, and any commercial use on residentially -zoned properties must remain strictly secondary and accessory to the primary home, requiring the business owner to live on -site. To protect the surrounding residents while fostering a creative community, the code permits a highly specific, limited list of low -impact uses. These include art studios, art galleries, photographic studios, in - home catering, art or culinary schools/classes, and approved home occupations. All such operations must be conducted entirely within enclosed structures, maintain strict quiet hours, and produce no external noise, glare, or odors that disrupt the neighborhood. • Residential transition area. Situated in the middle portion of the zone, this area serves as a physical and regulatory buffer between the commercial core and the quieter residential blocks. To bridge these two environments, the municipal code opens up a hybrid list of allowances. It permits low -intensity commercial activities like art supply/craft stores, picture frame shops, pottery/ceramic studios, jewelry shops, gift shops, and low -impact neighborhood retail alongside standard residences. • Commercial core area. Occupying the western end of the zone, this area acts as the primary commercial and economic anchor for the district. It permits higher -intensity, destination -style businesses that cater to both locals and tourists, such as specialty retail stores, convenience markets, standard restaurants with outdoor seating, and brew pubs. It grants property owners maximum commercial flexibility to stimulate foot traffic.

Wage
-14

Haynie's Corner Arts District Association
While the Evansville Arts Redevelopment Area Plan and the 2011 Arts Overlay Zone laid the legal and physical foundation for the district, the Haynie's Corner Arts District Association (HCADA) served as vital community leaders that brought the district's brand to life. A group of volunteers came together in 2011 to form a board and organize around shared values hoping to promote art and enhance the neighborhood. Creating a mission, developing bylaws, and establishing an executive committee along with formal board members allowed the group to establish itself as a 501c3 in 2015.

The Association coordinates major recurring events that activate the streetscape, such as the monthly "First Fridays" (featuring free live music, food trucks, and family -friendly activities), "Front Porch Fest," and the "Funk in the City" art festival. By maintaining a dedicated board comprised of local business owners, working artists, and residents, the HCADA ensures that the neighborhood's ongoing economic development remains dedicated to supporting the arts, advocating for local creators, and sustaining a genuine sense of community.

2. South A Street (SOFA) Art District, Santa Rosa, California Officially called the South A Street Art District, but more familiarly known as the SOFA District in Santa Rosa, California, this two -block corridor (approximately 0.13 miles) adjacent to Highway 101 is home to nearly 30 to 40 working artists' studios, as well as several galleries and businesses.

Before it was an arts district, South A Street was a commercial and automotive service corridor with auto transmission repair garages, plumbing warehouses, and light industrial workshops. The district's formal identity took shape in the mid -2000s. An organic coalition of independent artists, businesses, and galleries began moving into the area around 2005. Artists targeted vacant automotive repair facilities because their structural features such as high ceilings, open floor plans, and roll -up garage bay doors were ideal for artistic production.

Downtown Station Area Specific Plan —
Neihborhood Mixed Use Desi;nation
In October 2020, the Santa Rosa City
Council adopted an updated Downtown
Station Area Specific Plan (DSASP),
which includes the SOFA District.'
Within the DSASP, the SOFA District is
currently zoned as Neighborhood
Mixed Use (NMU). The NMU
designation allows for new multi -family
development in all -residential or
mixed -use buildings, combined with a
broad mix of uses including
professional office, retail,
entertainment, and other
neighborhood -scale supporting uses.

GA O.ti14
' 1i��
tS F RY
art '`
art
art.'
art-
arg,ict 1srict
grct
tstrict
(strict
'strict
4 City of Santa Rosa, Downtown Station Area Specific Plan, 2020. Available at: https://www.srcity.org/2911/Downtown- Station-Area-Specific-Plan. Accessed June 1, 2026.

Wage
-15-

Downtown Station Area Specific Plan — Active Ground Floor Overlay Along with the base NMU designation, within the DSASP, the SOFA District is also within an Active Ground Floor Overlay. The Overlay requires that new development activate the ground floor of buildings with uses and/or design techniques that engage the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. To comply, developments must provide at least two of the following features for frontages up to 90 linear feet, and at least three for frontages exceeding 90 feet:

1. Awnings or overhangs over all ground floor entrances;

2. One piece of street furniture per 15 linear feet of street frontage. Street furniture may include seating, ornamental planting boxes, informational kiosks, bicycle racks, or trash/recycling receptacles integrated into front setbacks where sidewalk width is not sufficient to accommodate street furniture;

3. Integrated public art in the form of a
mural, sculpture, light display, or other
original work of a permanent nature as
defined in the City Code;

4. At least 600 square feet of publicly
accessible active or passive recreational
space on -site, or in the form of a
curbside parklet;

5. A green/living wall of a size equivalent to
at least 15 percent of the building facade
as measured between two and 12 feet
above sidewalk level;

6. Innovative alternative strategies to
optimize the pedestrian experience
along Active Ground Floor Overlay
streets. Staff will evaluate proposals on a
case by case basis for compliance with
applicable DSASP Urban Design
Principles and development standards.

Surface parking is strictly prohibited
between the sidewalk and the front building
facade. Loading and service areas are not
allowed to be visible from streets in the
Active Ground Floor Overlay.

Santa Rosa Municipal Code Section 20-42.080, Live/Work and Work/live Units The NMU designation permits live/work spaces and maker -oriented uses, subject to performance standards. The purpose of the Live/work and work/live units ordinance is to:
" j...] provide standards for the development of new live/work and work/live units, and for the reuse of existing commercial and industrial structures to accommodate these units. Live/work and work/live units are intended to be occupied by business operators who live in the same structure where the commercial activity or industry occurs. A live/work unit is intended to function predominantly as living space with incidental accommodations 6IPage
-16

for work -related activities that are beyond the scope of a home occupation. A work/live unit is intended to function predominantly as work space with incidental residential accommodations that meet basic habitability requirements."'
The nonresidential component of a live/work or work/live project may include uses allowed within the applicable zoning district, subject to certain limitations. Vehicle maintenance and adult businesses are prohibited. Additionally, the Zoning Administrator may deem certain activities incompatible with residential uses or determine that they jeopardize the health or safety of residents.

To maintain the integrity of mixed -use
developments, the municipal code establishes
strict dimensional
regulations for both unit types, operating under
a baseline requirement of a 1,000 square foot
minimum net total floor area. The regulatory
distinction between the two formats depends
entirely on which use serves as the primary
function of the space:
• Live/Work Units (Residential -Primary): In a
live/work configuration, the residential
component is the dominant use. The code
restricts the secondary workspace (such as
an artist studio or office) to a maximum of
30 percent of the total floor area or 400
square feet, whichever is greater.
• Work/Live Units (Commercial -Primary): In
a work/live configuration, the utility is
flipped, making the commercial or
industrial workspace the dominant use. The
residential living quarters are capped at a
maximum of 30 percent of the total floor
area or 400 square feet, whichever is
greater.

The code also includes operating requirements that pertain to occupancy, nonresident employees, and client/customer visits. No portion of a live/work or work/live unit may be separately rented or sold as a commercial space for any person not living in the unit or as a residential space for any person not working in the same unit. Employment of three or more persons who do not reside in the unit may be permitted subject to Conditional Use Permit approval.
5 City of Santa Rosa, Santa Rosa Municipal Code, 2026. Available at: httos://ecode360.com/42982309. Accessed June 1, 2026.
71 Page
-17-

3. Hapeville Arts District, Hapeville, Georgia
The Hapeville Arts District Overlay is located within the City of Hapeville, Georgia, a small municipality immediately south of Atlanta. Generally, the Hapeville Arts District Overlay encompasses downtown Hapeville running along North Central and South Central Avenues (approximately 1 -mile stretch from Interstate 85 to Elm Street), Dogwood Drive (approximately 0.6 -mile stretch from South Central Avenue to Oak Drive), the two-lane segment of Virginia Avenue (approximately 0.25 -mile stretch from South Central Avenue to Doug Davis Drive) and North and South Fulton Avenues (approximately 0.21 -mile stretch from College Street to King Arnold Street). The Arts District Overlay was formally established through Ordinance No. 2015-13, adopted by the City Council on July 7, 2015.

The District contains a mix of artist studios, galleries, creative enterprises, public art installations, and adaptive reuse projects. Unlike many arts districts that emerged organically, Hapeville's Arts District Overlay was established through a formal zoning framework intended to attract arts -related businesses and support live - work opportunities while maintaining an active commercial environment.

Hapeville Municipal Code, Article 28 -A-D Zone (Arts District Overlay) The purpose of the arts district overlay is to:
"[...] facilitate creation of an arts destination, sustain established arts and cultural uses and promote new arts and cultural uses. The arts district overlay seeks integration of the arts into the fabric of the community and is conceived as the location of art galleries and art studios forming the core of an arts district. A complementary mix of shops, restaurants and entertainment venues will support these uses. These elements are expected to generate interest in downtown Hapeville and attract arts and cultural events.i6 6 City of Hapeville, Hapeville Municipal Code, 2026. Available at:
httpsl/library.municode.com/GA/Hapeville/coc,es/Code of Ordinances?nodeld=PTIICOOR CH93ZO ART28ZOARDIOV.

Accessed June 1, 2026.
8IPage
-18-

The ordinance defines a live -work unit as a space containing both residential and non-residential components, where the business or creative activity serves as the primary use and the residential component is secondary.

Each unit must contain sleeping quarters, cooking facilities, and complete sanitary facilities, while the residential and work areas must be shown separately on floor plans and maintain separate entrances. To maintain the employment and production focus of the district, the ordinance establishes several operational standards:
• A minimum unit size of 500 square feet is required;
• At least 50 percent of the unit must be dedicated to non-residential workspace; • A minimum of 250 square feet must be dedicated to residential living area; • The workspace may employ no more than two employees per shift, including the resident operator; • The residential and commercial portions may not be separately rented or sold; and • One off-street parking space is required per live -work unit, in addition to any parking required for the non-residential component.

The overlay permits multifamily residential development and live -work housing while encouraging active commercial uses at street level. Ground -floor spaces facing public streets, sidewalks, and alleys are intended to remain occupied by commercial, arts -related, or other non-residential uses that contribute to a vibrant pedestrian environment. Urban design standards require parking to be located behind buildings or screened from view, while building entrances must face public streets. To support the district's creative identity, certain outdoor sculptures and artistic installations are exempt from permit requirements when they do not obstruct circulation or function as advertising.
9iPage
-19-

STRATEGIC APPLICATIONS FOR BELLFLOWER
By extracting key lessons from Evansville, Santa Rosa, and Hapeville, the City can implement strategies that balance establishing a cultural destination with neighborhood preservation. The following recommendations establish a framework for the proposed Arts District, focusing on five core areas to support sustainable development and community enrichment.

1. Arts Overlay to Preserve Existing Uses and Allow for New Development Given Clark Avenue's mix of Commercial -General, R-1, and R-2 parcels, implementing an arts overlay zone (like Evansville's AOZ) creates a unifying regulatory layer across the proposed Arts District. It ensures existing businesses and homeowners can be preserved with their base zoning, while expanding opportunities for property owners who wish to convert spaces into alternative uses consistent with the City's Arts District vision.

2. Development Standards
Clear development standards drawn from other agencies, including Santa Rosa and Hapeville, could be explored to outline minimum and maximum square footage allowances based on the primary use of the structure (e.g., capping the residential footprint in commercial -primary units, and capping the workspace footprint in residential -primary units).

3. Permitted Uses
Beyond traditional artist workspaces, Bellflower can tailor the permitted use list to welcome community gathering spaces such as coffee shops, flower shops, and "paint and sip" venues. These businesses bridge the gap between creative production and neighborhood retail, driving consistent foot traffic while remaining compatible with nearby residential parcels.

4. Quality of Life
Protecting the residential quality of life is an important consideration when introducing a maker economy into a corridor with existing R-1 and R-2 properties. Bellflower may want to explore strategies such as ensuring medium -to -heavy maker activities are conducted entirely within enclosed structures, setting parameters for the number of non-resident employees allowed per shift, and establishing noise limits and quiet hours.

5. Public Realm
To create an inviting public realm, the overlay should establish clear design standards for how buildings engage with the street. Bellflower can adopt physical form requirements similar to Santa Rosa and Hapeville, such as mandating transparent glass or active uses on ground floor facades, and explicitly prohibiting surface parking lots or loading zones from being located between the building and the street. 10I Page
-20

ADDITIONAL IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS
Beyond updating zoning regulations, establishing a successful arts district requires active community engagement, strategic programming, and dedicated financial tools. The following implementation programs detail how Bellflower can foster a vibrant cultural identity and incentivize long-term investment along the Clark Avenue corridor.

1. Community Partnerships and Volunteer Design Committees Drawing directly from the case studies, such as Evansville's establishment of a Design Review Committee and/or an arts district association, Bellflower could form volunteer -led steering committees to help design the overlay and set aesthetic guidelines. Empowering local artists, residents, and business owners to actively shape the district ensures the resulting regulations reflect the community's identity.

2. Financial Incentives
Bellflower can explore financing strategies modeled after Evansville's revitalization. The City could establish a Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD), which captures future property tax growth to fund economic development and maintenance without increasing property taxes.' To implement this, the City would form a Public Financing Authority (PFA), comprised of three elected officials and two local community members, to oversee the Arts District's Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP). Utilizing tools like Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, the City can offer targeted grants to Low -to -Moderate Income (LMI) residents, fund property rehabilitation, and provide housing gap financing to attract and retain owner -occupant artists and business owners.

3. Streamlined Public Art Permitting
To encourage organic neighborhood branding, Bellflower can follow Hapeville's model by exempting specific public murals and outdoor sculptures from standard, lengthy permitting processes, provided they do not obstruct pedestrian circulation or function as commercial advertising.

4. First Friday Art Walks and Programming
Organizing and promoting monthly "First Friday" art walks along the Clark Avenue corridor is an effective way to organically build a district identity and generate consistent foot traffic. These recurring events activate the streetscape by allowing local artists, makers, and musicians to set up temporary pop-up booths alongside established businesses. This strategy serves as a low-cost marketing tool, introducing the broader Bellflower community to the arts district.

5. Creative Occupancy Verification
The City can protect the maker -focused identity of the corridor and ensure spaces are utilized by active makers by implementing administrative checks. This includes tying live/work occupancy to an active Bellflower Business License or requiring a basic portfolio review for prospective tenants.

SCAG, Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD), n.d. Available at: ,ttps://scag.ca.gov/Post/enhanced- infrastructure-financin::-district-eifd. Accessed June 4, 2026. 11IPage
-21-

REFERENCES
City of Evansville, Evansville Municipal Code Chapter 18.115, Arts Overlay Zone, 2026. Available at:
https://www.codejublishin2.com/IN . Evansville 'html 'Evansville18%'Evansville18115.html#18.115.020.

Accessed May 28, 2026.

City of Hapeville, Hapeville Municipal Code, 2026. Available at:
https://librarv.municode.com/GA/Haoeville/codes/Code of Ordinances?nodeld=PTIICOOR CH93ZO A RT28ZOARDIOV. Accessed June 1, 2026.

City of Santa Rosa, Downtown Station Area Specific Plan, 2020. Available at:
https://www.srcitv.org/2911/Downtown-Station-Area-Specific-Plan . Accessed June 1, 2026.

City of Santa Rosa, Santa Rosa Municipal Code, 2026. Available at: https://ecode360.com/42982309 . Accessed June 1, 2026.

Evansville Redevelopment Commission, Evansville Arts Redevelopment Area, February 2010. Available at:
https://www.evansvillegov.ou'ec:ov/documents/1500994268 48528.ndf. Accessed June 1, 2026.

Haynie's Corner Arts District Association, Haynie's Corner Arts District, 2026. Available at:
https://havniescorner.com/ . Accessed May 27, 2026.

SCAG, Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD), n.d. Available at: htt:s:l;'scazca.,ov% st/enhanced- infrastructure-financing-district-eifd. Accessed June 4, 2026. 12 IPage
-22-

GSS� OF BELLFLO1,�k
CROWING TOG£ ¢
stafteport 14-A
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
ATTENTION: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
FROM: Elizabeth C. Oba, Director of Planning and Building Services Alexander Salgado, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Consideration and possible action to receive, file and provide direction on the conceptual Arts District Overlay Zone (ADOZ).

DATE: August 10, 2026

RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
1) Receive, file, and provide direction regarding the conceptual ADOZ; or 2) Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

Page 1 of 7 ends

Bellflower City CouncilAugust 10, 2026

Bellflower City Council
August 10, 2026