5 Year CIP Pavement Plan
Paving Years FY23/24 through FY28/29
February 27, 2024
Sample image only: Change image
to reflect your presentation
subject. REMOVE THIS BOX
February 13, 2024 5 Year CIP Pavement Plan 222
• Background
• Pavement 101
• Pavement Management Principles
• Review Pavement Conditions and Needs
• Review Plan
Presentation Goals:
February 13, 2024 5 Year CIP Pavement Plan 3
• City voters passed ½ cent sales tax
Measure I (Streets & City Services) in
November 2016
• Adds $1M/year towards street
improvements
• Last pavement plan updated in 2021
Background:
PAVEMENT 101
What Determines a Pavement Section?
Pavement Deterioration
7 Block
Cracking
Alligator
Cracking
Transverse or
Longitudinal
Cracking
Weathering or
Raveling
Common Pavement Distresses
8 Evaluating Pavement: the PCI
100 – 91 = Excellent
90 – 71 = Good
70 – 51 = Fair/ At Risk
50 – 31 = Poor
30 – 0 = Failed
Developed by the U. S. Army Corp
of Engineers during World War II
and standardized by ASTM, the
PCI is an objective and rational
basis for determining pavement
condition and establishing
maintenance priorities.
PCI = 100
Excellent 100-91
PCI = 85
Good 90-71
PCI = 68
Fair 70-51
PCI = 60
Fair 70-51
PCI = 51
Fair 70-51
PCI = 38
Poor 50-31
PCI = 28
Failed 30-0
PCI = ?
17 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES
18 Applying the RIGHT TREATMENT
to the RIGHT PAVEMENT
at the RIGHT TIME
using the RIGHT MATERIALS
19 Pavement Preservation Timing
Cape Seal /
TMO / Light
Overlay
Heavy
Overlay
20 Pavement Management Strategies
•Best-First “Top Down” Management
•Worst-First “Bottom Up” Management
•Critical-Point Management
Pavement Management Strategies Critical Point Management 21 Critical-Point-Management
selects streets before they
deteriorate and need the
next more expensive
treatment.
Heavy Overlay
Cape Seal / TMO /
Light Overlay
¢¢
¢
$
$$$
22 CURRENT PAVEMENT CONDITIONS
AND NEEDS
City of Belmont System Data
•System Size
69.97 centerline miles
10,545,246 square feet of pavement
•System-wide average weighted PCI of 68
•Replacement value of ~$657 million
23 Maintained Road System
(As of December 2023)
Functional
Classification
Centerline
Miles Lane Miles Area (SqFt) Percent of
System Average PCI
Arterial 12.38 24.00 2,041,505 19.36% 79
Collector 9.71 20.14 1,538,895 14.59% 70
Residential 47.88 95.14 6,964,846 66.05% 64
TOTAL 69.97 139.28 10,545,246 100% 68
26 83
73 68
68 68
59 55
60 65
70 75
80 85
90 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029
PCI Range
Year
6 Year Projections
(S1) System Needs
$103M/Yr 1,
Avg. $2.1M/Yr 2-6
(S2) Increase PCI by 5
Avg. $9.8M/Yr
(S3) Maintain 68 PCI
Avg. $4.6M/Yr
(S4) 2024-2029
Proposed Pavement Plan
(S5) Zero Budget
February 13, 2024 5 Year CIP Pavement Plan 27
February 13, 2024 5 Year CIP Pavement Plan 28
February 13, 2024 5 Year CIP Pavement Plan 29
1) Evaluation of the City’s PMP Database
2) Field Review Streets
3) Update Unit Prices
4) Develop Five-Year Project Lists
5 Year CIP Pavement Plan Update:
• Updated estimated construction costs (July 2023)
• Included Miscellaneous Costs:
• Curb ramp upgrades
• Curb and gutter repairs (tree roots, drainage, roadside improvements)
• Stormwater (MRP) permit requirements. 20-25% cost
increase for reconstruction projects.
• Soft cost (design, materials testing, and construction management)
• 10% contingency
February 13, 2024 5 Year CIP Pavement Plan 30
INCREASED UNIT PRICES
Result:
Unit prices increased 100% to 150% for maintenance
projects and 200% for rehabilitation projects
February 13, 2024 5 Year CIP Pavement Plan 31
PLAN YEAR ESTIMATED
COST
CENTERLINE
MILES
RESULTING
PCI
FY 22/23 $ 3,891,888 2.6 68
FY 23/24 $ 929,235 6.0 71
FY 24/25 $ 5,594,090 2.6 71
FY 25/26 $ 3,153,421 1.2 70
FY 26/27 $ 3,545,043 0.5 70
FY 27/28 $ 3,287,717 1.1 70
FY 28/29 $ 964,178 6.4 68
CITY OF BELMONT
PAVEMENT EXPENDITURE PLAN
YEARS FY 22/23 THROUGH FY 28/29
February 13, 2024 5 Year CIP Pavement Plan 32
February 13, 2024 5 Year CIP Pavement Plan 33
February 13, 2024 5 Year CIP Pavement Plan 34
February 13, 2024 5 Year CIP Pavement Plan 35
February 13, 2024 5 Year CIP Pavement Plan 36
February 13, 2024 5 Year CIP Pavement Plan 37
38 QUESTIONS
FISCAL YEAR 2023‐24 BUDGET
MID‐YEAR REVIEW
City Council Meeting
February 27, 2024
2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARYFINANCIAL RESULTS
FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY
FINANCIAL OUTLOOK
RECOMMENDATION
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2/27/2024 FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review 3
General Fund tracking to budget expectationsState actions to take away property tax in‐lieu of VLFNeed to maintain City services and infrastructureResolutions requested from Council
FINANCIAL RESULTS
4 FINANCIAL RESULTS
2/27/2024 FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review 5
GENERAL FUND
12/31 Fund Balance
Up $2.9M over
last fiscal year end
Revenues
Year end estimates are0.9% over budget
Expenditures
Year end estimates are2.2% under budget
Local Economy
Leading indicatorsmixed but overall
tracking to budget
expectations in FY
2023‐24
FINANCIAL RESULTS
2/27/2024 FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review 6
YEAR‐TO‐DATE RESULTS AS OFDEC. 31, 2023 (IN MILLIONS)
Fund Balance
(12/31/23) Revenues Expenditures
General Fund (Excluding Measure I) $15.0 $14.4* $27.1*Belmont Fire Protection District 223 9.9 9.4 20.7 Development Services 210 3.9 2.7 2.6Recreation 205 0.9 1.8 (0.3)Street Maintenance 231 0.6 1.2 (0.6) Storm Drain 525 0.6 1.0 1.7
*Includes 50% of budgeted operating transfers anticipated at year‐end $‐
$2$4$6$8
$10$12$14$16
2014‐15 2015‐16 2016‐17 2017‐18 2018‐19 2019‐20 2020‐21 2021‐22 2022‐23 2023‐24 ActualsBudgetEstimate
FINANCIAL RESULTS
2/27/2024 FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review 7
PROPERTY TAX
(IN MILLIONS)
Final Dissolution of Successor
Agency; one‐time bump from VLF
reimbursement
$‐
$0.5$1.0$1.5$2.0$2.5$3.0$3.5$4.0$4.5$5.0
2014‐15 2015‐16 2016‐17 2017‐18 2018‐19 2019‐20 2020‐21 2021‐22 2022‐23 2023‐24 ActualsBudgetEstimate
FINANCIAL RESULTS
2/27/2024 FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review 8
SALES TAX: 1% BRADLEY BURNS*
(IN MILLIONS)
*Excludes Measure I ½‐Cent Tax
$‐
$0.5$1.0$1.5$2.0$2.5
2016‐17 2017‐18 2018‐19 2019‐20 2020‐21 2021‐22 2022‐23 2023‐24 ActualsBudgetEstimate
FINANCIAL RESULTS
2/27/2024 FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review 9
SALES TAX: MEASURE I
(IN MILLIONS)
Measure I
Started
April 2017
$‐
$0.5$1.0$1.5$2.0$2.5$3.0$3.5$4.0$4.5
2014‐15 2015‐16 2016‐17 2017‐18 2018‐19 2019‐20 2020‐21 2021‐22 2022‐23 2023‐24 ActualsBudgetEstimate
FINANCIAL RESULTS
2/27/2024 FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review 10
HOTEL ROOM TAX
(IN MILLIONS)
Revenue
Trending Toward
Pre‐Pandemic Levels
FINANCIAL RESULTS
2/27/2024 FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review 11
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES(IN MILLIONS)
% of
Total 12/31/23
FY 2023‐24
Adjusted
Budget
Personnel $18.0 $8.7 48%
$3.5 $1.3 37% Services & Supplies$4.2 $2.1 50% Admin & Other Major General Fund‐Supported Transfers• Recreation Fund $1.1M
• Development Services Fund
$1.0M
• Street Maintenance Fund
$2.5M
FINANCIAL RESULTS
2/27/2024 FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review 12
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Completed CIP Projects (FY 2023‐24)
• Ralston Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation
Project
• San Juan Pump Station Slope Repair
Project
Sewer Treatment• Ongoing contributions
to SVCW for RESCU program
58%
33%
1%
5% 3%
Sewer StreetsTechnology FacilitiesParks & Open Space
FISCAL
SUSTAINABILITY
13 Future
impact to General Fund
$4‐$6 million
annually
FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY
2/27/2024 FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review 14
PROPERY TAX IN‐LIEU OF VLF
• VLF continues to be underfunded
• State refuses to meet its VLF payment
obligation
• $1.1M shortfall in FY 2022‐23
Entire Business License Tax Revenue
• ~$1.7M shortfall in FY 2023‐24
• City Manager’s group continues to work
in conjunction with the County
FINANCIAL OUTLOOK
15 FINANCIAL OUTLOOK
FUND BALANCE IMPACT WITH VLF FUNDING(IN MILLIONS)
2/27/2024 FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review 16
$(7.0)$(2.0)
$3.0$8.0
$13.0$18.0$23.0$28.0
Actuals/Estimates33% Target
FINANCIAL OUTLOOK
FUND BALANCE IMPACT WITHOUT VLF(IN MILLIONS)
2/27/2024 FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review 17
$(8)$(4)
$‐
$4$8
$12$16$20$24$28
2022‐23 2023‐24 2024‐25 2025‐26 2026‐27 2027‐28 2028‐29 2029‐30 2030‐31 Actuals/Estimates33% Target
2031‐32 2032‐33
FINANCIAL OUTLOOK
REVENUE & EXPENDITURE ESTIMATES
(IN MILLIONS)
2/27/2024 FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review 18
$29$31$33$35$37$39
2023‐24 2024‐25 2025‐26 2026‐27 2027‐28 2028‐29 2029‐30 2030‐31 2031‐32 2032‐33 RevenuesExpenditures
GENERAL FUND
2/27/2024 FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review 19
COMPARISON OF GENERAL FUND
BALANCE AS OF JUNE 30, 2023
(IN MILLIONS)
$27
$55
$111
$63
$95
$54
$35
$-
$20 $40 $60 $80
$100 $120
Burlingame San Mateo* Foster City Belmont Redwood
City*
San Carlos Menlo Park
Measure I General Fund
*General Fund balance as of June 30, 2023 not currently available; amounts shown are as of June 30, 2022.
Belmont’s General Fund balance as of June 30, 2023 was $27 million; Measure I Fund balance was $4 million.
AVAILABLE REVENUES
2/27/2024 FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review 20
COMPARISON OF GENERAL FUND
REVENUES PER HOUSEHOLD
$6,567
$3,767
$4,578
$2,943
$5,573
$4,872
$6,080
$-
$1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000
Burlingame San Mateo Foster City Belmont Redwood
City
San Carlos Menlo Park
Local Transaction Tax / Measure Ifor Belmont Miscellaneous Service Charges Transient Occupancy Tax Sales & Use Taxes Property Tax Denotes the 7‐city average revenue of $4,881 per household “Miscellaneous" includes Licensing Fees, Real Estate Transfer Tax, Licenses and Permits, Intergovernmental Sources, Fines and Forfeitures, Interest and Rent Income, and other.
RECOMMENDATION
21 RECOMMENDATION
NEXT STEPS
2/27/2024 FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review 22
Continue communityengagement to identify
community service priorities;
explore targeted, locally
‐
controlled revenue sources
FY 2024
‐25 Budget directive will
reflect ongoing efforts to
address financial sustainability
&
Council’s Strategic Focus Areas
RECOMMENDATIONS
FY 2023
‐24 MID
‐YEAR
BUDGET RESOLUTIONS
2/27/2024 FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review 23
• Revisions to capital improvement project budgets
• Based on updated project estimates and timelines
• Transfer revenues to CIP Project expenditure funds
• Address actions previously approved by Council,
variances based on YTD estimates
• Adopt resolutions amending FY 2023
‐24 Budgets for:
• The City of Belmont
• Belmont Fire Protection District
Monte Cresta Drive
Single Family Home & Road Extension Project
February 13, 2024
Entitlements
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 2
Road Improvement Plan
Single-Family Design Review
Floor Area Transfer
Conditional Use Permit
Exceptions to Roadway Standards
Grading Permit
Tree Removal Permit
Planning Commission Recommendation
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 3
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on November 21, 2023. The Planning Commission voted in favor to adopt a resolution recommending the City Council approve the project entitlements and exceptions. The Commission’s recommendation also required that the project geotechnical engineer provide an updated letter to the project Geotechnical Investigation report addressing the 2018 Seismic Hazards Map Act (SHMA) requirements. The geotechnical information addressing the 2018 SHMA was submitted for the project and was peer reviewed by the City’s geotechnical consultant in a letter dated January 26, 2024.
Planning Commission Recommendation
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 4
The geotechnical and peer review letters addressing the SHMA are included in Attachment F in the Staff Report.
Public Comments
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 5
Fire safety and wildfire planning
Incremental extension of unimproved roads
Compliance with the San Juan Hill Area Plan, City Code and Zoning Ordinance Compliance with the Belmont General Plan and the San Juan Hills Area Plan policies Compliance CEQA
Compliance with the 2018 Seismic Hazards Map Act
Public comments received and responses are included in Attachment D in the Staff Report.
Project Location
June 26, 2023 Monte Cresta Drive 6
Project Summary
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 7
Overview
Construction of 3,299 square-foot two-story residence with an attached garage with a driveway extending from the terminus of Monte Cresta Drive. Construction of a road segment extending Monte Cresta Drive with a fire truck turnaround/cul-de-sac at the western terminus of Monte Cresta Drive.
Roadway Improvement Plan
Vacant Lands and Unimproved Roads
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 9
Vacant Lands and Unimproved Roads
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 10
San Juan Hills Plan Infrastructure Road Policy 10 and Belmont City Code Sec. 7-13(e) An application for a home within the San Juan Hills that is not located on an improved road must be accompanied by a road improvement plan for either the entire unimproved road, or for an unimproved road segment.
Vacant Lands and Unimproved Roads
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 11
Geological Hazards Map
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 12
San Juan
Canyon
Ground
Movement
Potential Map
The roadway alignment west of the project site is mapped as "PDf" indicating potential debris flow movement which is the category of hazard affecting the proposed road segment.
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 13
Feasibility of a Through Road
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 14
Belmont City Code Sec. 7-13(e)(9)b.1 - A report signed by a licensed geotechnical engineer concluding that the physical constraints are such that a stable road cannot be reasonably constructed through to a paved road.
Geotechnical Review
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 15
Geotechnical Feasibility Study (June 2008)
Feasibility Evaluation (December 2015)
Geotechnical Investigation (January 2016),
Geotechnical Responses and Peer Reviews (2015 – 2023) 2018 Seismic Hazards Map Act Response & Peer Review (January 2024) Copies of the geotechnical studies and peer review letters are included in Attachment I of the Staff Report.
Geotechnical Review
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 16
A through road is not feasible due to severe geologic constraints (Feasibility report prepared by Romig Engineers dated June 2008 and Updated letter 2017). The City's geotechnical consultants concurred that the through road is impractical and economically very costly because of very significant landslide constraints (Cotton, Shires and Associates Peer Review Letter, October 26, 2017) The proposed roadway extension and construction of the single-family home is geotechnically feasible with utilization of appropriate geotechnical design criteria.
Proposed Road Segment Plan
Existing Cul-de-Sac
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 18
Existing Cul-de-Sac
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 19
Street View - Existing Cul-de-Sac
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 20
Site Plan
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 21
Proposed Cul-de-Sac
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 22
Exceptions to Road Standards
Exception to Parking Lanes
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 24
Belmont City Codes section 7-13 (e)(7) - An exception may be granted upon recommendation of the City engineer based on consultation with the fire chief based on appropriate engineering evaluations.
Fire Department Requirement - Parking within the turnaround should be designated as “No Parking” and “rolled red curb” to provide for adequate emergency access Recommendation - The city engineer and fire department reviewed the exception request to parking lanes and can recommend approval of the exception.
The City Engineer and Fire Department recommendation is included in attachment M in the Staff Report.
General Standards for Cul-de-sacs
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 25
Belmont City Code Section 7-13(4)(i) - Cul-de-sacs shall be no longer than eight hundred (800) feet with a turnaround radius of thirty-two (32) feet. Longer cul-de-sacs and smaller turnarounds may be permitted upon the recommendation of the city engineer based on consultation with the fire chief.
Proposed Cul-de-sacs
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 26
Standard - 32’ Radius
Proposed - 29.5’ Radius
Standard - 800’ In Length
Existing - 820 in Length
Proposed - 870’ in Length
Floor Area Transfer &
Development Potential
Floor Area Ratio Table
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 28
AVERAGE SLOPE FAR SLIDING SCALE MINIMUM FLOOR AREA
(LOTS 36% - 45% SLOPE AND UP)
36% 0.053 1,080
37% 0.048 1,060
38% 0.044 1,040
39% 0.041 1,020
40% 0.038 1,000
41% 0.035 980
42% 0.032 960
43% 0.030 940
44% 0.028 920
45% & UP 0.026 900
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 29
Floor Area Transfer
Development Potential
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 30
49% slope is allowed 900 sq. ft. of floor area. 900 sq. ft.
Permanent Transfer of 2,400 square of floor area. 2,400 sq. ft.
Total Floor Area 3,300 sq. ft.
Single-Family Design Review
Site Plan
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 32
Elevations - Materials and Color
November 21, 2023 Monte Cresta Drive 33
Landscape Plan
November 21, 2023 Monte Cresta Drive 34
Conditional Use Permit
Certificate of Compliance
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 36
A Certificate of Compliance is a legal document which certifies that a parcel of land complies with the Subdivision Map Act or if a lot was created legally. Properties that do not comply with the Subdivision Map Act or not created legally are instead issued a Conditional Certificate of Compliance. A Conditional Certificate of Compliance is used to establish a legal record when a parcel was not legally created. It contains conditions of approval that must be satisfied before any other permits can be approved or issued.
Certificate of Compliance
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 37
The lot for development and lots considered for floor area transfers were not legally created and were issued a Conditional Certificate of Compliance (CCOC). The conditions in the CCOC applies to lots that with development potential. The CCOC conditions for the two sending transfer lots do not apply. The lots would result in the establishment of a conservation which would eliminate the development potential of the two lots.
Development Criteria
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 38
DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA MINIMUM
REQUIRED PROPOSED
Frontage 40 ft. Approx. 64 ft.**
Avg. Lot Width 60 ft. Approx. 77 ft.**
Lot Size (sq. ft.) 403,333 sq. ft.* 9,137 sq. ft**
*Based on the BZO Sec. 4.7.9 Table 1 (HRO Density and Minimum Lot Size Standards), the subject site at 49% slope is required a minimum lot size of 403,333 sq. ft. ** Adjusted lot size and lot dimension after right-of-way dedication.
HRO2 Density & Minimum Lot Size Standards
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 39
AVERAGE LOT SLOPE DWELLINGS PER NEW
ACRE
MINIMUM LOT SIZE
1 – 10% 1.452 30292
11% 1.357 32100
12% 1.274 34192
13% 1.200 36300
14% 1.134 38413
15% 1.076 40483
16% 1.023 42581
17% 0.908 47974
18% 0.816 53382
19% 0.741 58785
20% 0.679 64153
21% 0.626 69585
22% 0.581 74974
23% 0.542 80369
24% 0.508 85748
25% 0.478 91130
26% 0.448 97232
27% 0.422 103223
28% 0.399 109173
HRO2 Density & Minimum Lot Size Standards
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 40
AVERAGE LOT SLOPE DWELLINGS PER NEW
ACRE
MINIMUM LOT SIZE
27% 0.422 103223
28% 0.399 109173
29% 0.378 115238
30% 0.359 121337
31% 0.342 127368
32% 0.315 138286
33% 0.292 149178
34% 0.271 160738
35% 0.243 179259
36% 0.220 198000
37% 0.201 216716
38% 0.184 236739
39% 0.171 254737
40% 0.159 273962
41% 0.145 300414
42% 0.133 327519
43% 0.123 354146
44% 0.115 378783
45% 0.108 403333
Conditional Use Permit
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 41
Belmont Zoning Ordinance - Section 4.7.9 “a Conditional Use Permit authorizing a smaller lot size”
SJHAP Policy 9.c, states, “Regulations shall be developed to provide incentive to landowners who purchase the development potential. These incentives may include reduced minimum lot sizes, increases in the sizes of houses, or density bonuses.”
Grading & Tree Removal Permit
Grading
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 43
GRADING CUT: 150 CUBIC
YARDS (CY)
FILL: 650 CUBIC
YARDS (CY)
500 CY
(FILL-IMPORT)
Tree Removal
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 44
California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA)
Environmental Clearance (CEQA)
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 46
The project is eligible for a categorical exemption under CEQA Guidelines:
• Section 15303 (a) and (d), New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. (a) One single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences may be constructed or converted under this exemption.
(d) Water main, sewage, electrical, gas, and other utility extensions, including street improvements, of reasonable length to serve such construction.
• Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects.
Conclusion
Actions Requested by the City Council
February 13, 2024 Monte Cresta Drive 48
CONCLUSION / ACTIONS
Consider the Planning Commission recommendation and the adopt a Resolution approving the entitlements or take the following actions:
ACTIONS / ALTERNATIVES
• Direct staff to prepare resolutions based on findings provided by the City Council to deny the entitlement applications.
• Continue the matter and direct staff to prepare an alternative course of action. • Refer back to staff for additional information.
April 25, 2023 Belmont 2025 and Beyond 49
THANK YOU
WWW.BELMONT.GOV
MUNICIPAL ANNUAL REPORT
INFORMATIONAL UPDATE
February 27, 2024
February 27, 2024 MRP Informational Update 2
BACKGROUND | Municipal Regional Permit 3.0
Objective
• Framework aimed at stormwater
management to prevent pollution &
mitigate impacts of urban runoff
Tasks Include
• Monitoring and Implementation of best
management practices (BMPs)
• Public Education
• Coordination with the San Mateo
Countywide Water Pollution Prevention
Program
• Submittal of Annual Report
• A 100-page document that includes the following:
• C.1 – Permittee Information
• C.2 – Municipal Operations
• C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment
• C.4 – Industrial and Commercial Site Controls
• C.5 – Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
• C.6 – Construction Site Controls
• C.7 – Public Information and Outreach
• C.9 – Pesticides Toxicity Controls
• C.10 – Trash Load Reduction
• C.11 – Mercury Controls
• C.12 – PCBs Controls
• C.13 – Copper Controls
• C.15 – Exempted and Conditionally Exempted Discharges • C.17 – Discharges Associated with Unsheltered Homeless Populations • SMCWPPP submits an overall report as well, that includes:
• C.8 – Water Quality Monitoring
• C.20 – Cost Reporting
February 27, 2024 MRP Informational Update 3
REPORTING | ANNUAL REPORT
• 2023: reissued as MRP 3.0
• Lowered threshold for project regulation requirement for both new developments and Capital Improvement projects
• Created Provision C.17 – Discharges Associated with Unsheltered Homeless Populations
• Created Provision C.20 – Cost Reporting, which will help track the increased cost and effort by staff with the increased requirements from MRP 3.0, and will be implemented for reporting in FY24/25
February 27, 2024 MRP Informational Update 4
BACKGROUND | MRP 3.0
• Increased Mandates
Tracking encampments and addressing illegal dumping, illicit discharges, and other stormwater concerns stemming from unsheltered populations.
Developing and implementing the use of new expansive asset management programs.
Constructing rain gardens and other green infrastructure at higher levels.
Requiring more ambitious and challenging trash load reduction targets. Regulating more development projects that require stormwater control plans and ongoing inspections.
Implementing new best management practices, standard operating procedures, and reporting for discharges of water and foam used in emergency firefighting applications.
Increasing water quality monitoring region-wide with an average annual increase of approximately $500,000/year, which is about 40% higher than the typical annual expenditure for this service area. Increasing reporting requirements in a variety of areas.
February 27, 2024 MRP Informational Update 5
BACKGROUND | MRP 3.0
February 27, 2024 MRP Informational Update 6
CHALLENGES
• Trash and PCBs reduction
• Provision C.3 requirements for single-family
homes and large developments
• Implementation of GI for pavement projects
OPPORTUNITIES
• Partnered with San Mateo Countywide Water
Pollution Prevention Program
• Collaboration with Silicon Valley Clean Water
CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
February 27, 2024 MRP Informational Update 7
FUTURE ACTION ITEMS
FOR CONTINUED COMPLIANCE
Continued implementation and refinement of BMPs.
Ongoing public education and outreach initiatives.
Collaboration with stakeholders to address challenges and explore funding opportunities.
Regular monitoring and reporting in accordance with permit requirements.
Thank you