Agenda packet — Belmont City Council, January 27, 2026

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

3. ITEMS BEFORE 7:00 PM

4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

5. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION

6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS

7. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT

ON THE AGENDA

8. COUNCILMEMBER ANNOUNCEMENTS

9. CONSENT BUSINESS

10. PUBLIC HEARINGS (none)

11. GENERAL BUSINESS

12. BRIEF VERBAL REPORTS FROM

MEMBERS AND STAFF

13. MATTERS OF

INTEREST/CLARIFICATION

14. ADJOURNMENT
City Council
Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, January 27, 2026 City Council Chambers
City Hall, One Twin Pines Lane, Belmont, California
General order of Business City Council
Julia Mates, Mayor
Robin Pang-Maganaris, Vice Mayor
Gina Latimerlo, Councilmember
Tom McCune, Councilmember
Cathy Jordan, Councilmember
Staff
Afshin Oskoui, City Manager
Scott Rennie, City Attorney
Kathy Kleinbaum, Assistant City Manager
Ken Stenquist, Police Chief
Grace Castaneda, Finance Director
Ann Ritzma, Interim Admin Services Director
Carlos deMelo, Community Development Director
Brigitte Shearer, Parks and Recreation Director
Edric Kwan, Public Works Director
Jozi Plut, City Clerk
MEETING ATTENDANCE:

Council meetings, unless otherwise noted, are broadcast live to Belmont residents on

1. Comcast Cable Channel 27

2. Streamed live via the City's website at www.Belmont.gov

3. ZOOM https://belmont-gov.zoom.us/ Meeting ID: 95745673035

4. Attend the meeting in the Council Chambers, Belmont City Hall 2nd floor PUBLIC COMMENT:

Public in the Council Chamber present the Clerk a request to speak slip found at the table at the rear of the chamber.

If participating virtually use the Raise Hand feature to request to speak.

For dial- in comments, call *67 1-(669) 900-6833 (your phone number will appear on the live broadcast if *67 is not dialed prior to the phone number) enter Meeting ID: 95745673035, and press *9 to request to speak All public comments are subject to a 3-minute time limit unless otherwise determined by the Chair.

Belmont City Council Meeting Agenda January 27, 2026
1 To submit a written public comment:

E-mail [email protected] before the Council discusses the item, noting the agenda topic or number in the subject line. Comments received up to three hours before the meeting will be distributed to the Council and included in the record but not read aloud during the meeting..

The Mayor has the authority to rule any speaker out of order, including speakers during the Public Comment period; If the subject raised is not within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council, during a public hearing or a general business item if the speaker is not presenting testimony or evidence relevant to the matter or if the speaker becomes disruptive to the proceedings and conduct of the meeting.

The Mayor also has the authority to order any person who willfully interrupts the meeting to be removed. All persons are expected to always conduct themselves with civility and courtesy. All persons giving comments shall speak directly to the Council and address issues, not individuals. Personal attacks, cursing and outbursts from the audience in support or opposition to a speaker are not tolerated to foster an environment where everyone feels welcome to speak.

LEVINE ACT:

The Levine Act (California Government Code Section 84308) limits campaign contributions that may be made to elected or appointed City officials (including councilmembers and the mayor) and certain candidates for elective city offices. The Act prohibits an agent of a party from contributing any amount to councilmember while a proceeding for a contract valued at $50,000 or more, permit, license, or other entitlement for use is pending that does not solely involve purely ministerial decisions. The Act also prohibits parties and participants in the above entitlement proceedings from contributing more than $500 during the proceeding and for 12 months after the proceeding and requires disclosure of the prohibited contributions. The Act prohibits certain officials, including local elected officials, from taking part in an entitlement proceeding if the official has received a contribution exceeding $500 from a party or participant in the proceeding within the preceding 12 months. An official is also prohibited from accepting, soliciting, or directing a contribution exceeding $500 from a party or participant in the proceeding for 12 months after a final decision is rendered in such a proceeding. The law is complex, and this brief description is not legal advice. If you or an agent have made any campaign contributions to a councilmember in the 12 months before a proceeding in which you have an interest or you are contemplating making a contribution within the 12 months after such a proceeding, you are urged to review the Levine Act and consider consulting an attorney. The California Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) is responsible for administering the Levine Act. More information about the Act and its implementing regulations can be found on the FPPC’s website here:
https://www.fppc.ca.gov/learn/pay-to-play-limits-and-prohibitions.html

ACCESSIBILITY
If you need assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (650) 595-7413. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

AGENDA POSTING: I declare a copy of this agenda was posted at City Hall, One Twin Pines Lane, and the City's website www.Belmont.gov Date: Time: /s/:

Belmont City Council Meeting Agenda January 27, 2026
2 1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

3. ITEMS BEFORE 7:00 PM

4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

5. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION

6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. HIP Housing Calendar Presentation
B. Introduction of Poet Laureate
C. Mosquito Vector Control Annual Update
City of Belmont
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda
January 27, 2026
City Council Chambers
City Hall, One Twin Pines Lane, Belmont, California

NOTICE REGARDING MEETING SCHEDULE
The City Council may meet prior to 7:00 PM for Study Sessions, Closed Sessions, or other Special Topics. All other business will commence at 7:00 PM as a time-certain agenda item.

Roll Call
A. CLOSED SESSION (6:30 PM)
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), three cases:

I.) Hamamjy v. City of Belmont,
San Mateo Superior Court No. 24-CIV-05819
II.) Friends of Waterdog Open Space, Deniz Bolbol, Joseph P. Cuviello v. City of Belmont et al.

San Mateo SuperiorCourt No. 24-CIV-02320
III.) McGuire and Hester v. Carmel Construction West, LLC, San Mateo Superior Court No. 25-CIV-00267
IV.) Belmont Village Community Association v. City of Belmont, San Mateo Superior Court No. 26-CIV-00463
B. STUDY SESSION
The public will have an opportunity to address the City Council concerning this item.

C. SPECIAL SESSION/OTHER TOPICS (none)
ITEMS STARTING AT 7:00 PM
Belmont City Council Meeting Agenda January 27, 2026
3 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA

8. COUNCILMEMBER ANNOUNCEMENTS

9. CONSENT BUSINESS
A. Approval of Minutes
B. Monthly Financial Reports - October and November 2025 C. Belmont Creek Restoration Project - Accept construction and authorize issuance of Notice of Completion; initiate five-year habitat monitoring and maintenance plan project and authorize budget transfer
D. Belmont Village Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements Project Shared Cost Agreement with Linc Housing Development
E. Follow-Up: City Council Vice Mayor Appointment and Calendar Year 2026 This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Body on any City matter not on the agenda. The period for public comment at this point in the agenda is limited to 15 minutes, with a maximum of 3 minutes per speaker. Speakers who requested but did not receive an opportunity to speak during this comment period will be given an opportunity to address the Body later in the meeting. State law prohibits the Body from acting on non-agenda items.

Consent business items are considered to be routine in nature and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a member or staf request specific items to be removed for separate action.

The City Attorney will read the title of ordinances to be adopted.

Recommendation: Consider modification and approval of minutes Attachments:

December 9, 2025 Minutes
Recommendation: Motion to approve financial reports.

Attachments:

October 2025 COB Monthly Report
November 2025 COB Monthly Report
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution (1) accepting the construction work and authorizing the issuance of a Notice of Completion for the Belmont Creek Restoration Project, City Contract Number 2024-6 35, including release of retention 35 days after recording of the Notice of Completion; and (2) initiate Belmont Creek Habitat Monitoring and Maintenance Plan and authorize budget transfer.

Attachments:

Staff Report
Resolution
Scope and Fees
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute a Shared Cost Agreement with Linc Housing Development Project (Linc Project) for reimbursement of construction costs associated with overlapping improvements between the City of Belmont’s Belmont Village Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements Project and the Linc Project’s frontage improvements, in the amount of $187,004.15 plus a 10% contingency.

Attachments:

Staff Report
Resolution
Linc Development Cost Estimate
Belmont City Council Meeting Agenda January 27, 2026
4 Intergovernmental Assignments
F. Establishment of Director of Special Projects Classification

10. PUBLIC HEARINGS (none)

11. GENERAL BUSINESS
A. State Legislative Advocacy for the City of Belmont - 2026 Update B. Redwood Shores Sea Level Rise Protection Project
C. CalPERS 180-Day Waiting Period Exception – Interim Administrative Services Director Appointment

12. BRIEF VERBAL REPORTS FROM MEMBERS AND STAFF

13. MATTERS OF INTEREST/CLARIFICATION
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council receive this report confirming the 2026 Vice Mayor appointment and Intergovernmental Assignments as discussed and approved at the December 9, 2025 meeting and review the current list of assignments to determine whether any changes are needed.

Attachments:

Staff Report
2026 Assignments
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution establishing the classification of Director of Special Projects, approving the associated job description, and authorizing the City Manager to implement the classification, including placement within the City’s salary schedule.

Attachments:

Staff Report
Resolution
Director of Special Projects Classification
General Business items are considered separately, typically in the order listed. The chair will call for public comment on each item when the body considers the item.

Recommendation: Motion to reaffirm Belmont's and Federal Legislative Platform.

Attachments:

Staff Report
Draft 2026 Legislative Platform
Recommendation: This is an informational item only; no action is required.

Attachments:

Staff Report
Presentation
Recommendation: Adopt a resolution approving an exception to the CalPERS 180-Day Waiting Period and Interim Appointment of Ann Ritzma to Administrative Services Director.

Attachments:

Staff Report
Resolution
Annuitant Appointment
A. Verbal report from Councilmembers on Intergovernmental (IGR) and Subcommittee Assignments
B. Verbal report from City Manager
Belmont City Council Meeting Agenda January 27, 2026
5 14. ADJOURNMENT
Items in this category are for discussion and direction to staf only. However, Council/Board may take final action on an item if there is no need for additional staf analysis.

Belmont City Council Meeting Agenda January 27, 2026
6 City Council Meeting Minutes
December 9, 2025

Page 1 ends

CITY OF BELMONT CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
City Council Chambers, City Hall, One Twin Pines Lane, Belmont, California December 9, 2025

1. CALL TO ORDER 6:30 PM
Roll Call
COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Latimerlo, McCune, Jordan, Pang-Maganaris, Mates COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: None

2. ITEMS BEFORE 7:00 PM
A. CLOSED SESSION (none)
B. STUDY SESSION (none)
C. SPECIAL SESSION/OTHER TOPICS
i. Community Service Award Presentation
Council recognized residential property located at 1010 Notre Dame Ave and commercial properties – Jolly’s Old Fashioned Teas Cream (owners Jason Herrick and Vanessa Green), Salon 1322, Amara restaurant (owners Ajay Walia and Reena Miglani).
ii. Beautiful Belmont Awards Presentation
Council recognized Clarissa Naftzger and Karl Mittlestadt for their service to the Belmont Community.

RECESS: 6:43 PM
RECONVENE: 7:00 PM

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Led by the Belmont Police Honor Guard.

4. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION (none)

5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. State Legislative Update - Assembly Member Diane Papan Assemblymember Diane Papan provided a State Legislation update.

B. Proclamation Recognizing Outgoing Poet Laureate
Monika Korde outlined her tenure as Belmont Poet Laureate.

Mayor Mates on behalf of Council presented a proclamation for Ms. Korde. 7 City Council Meeting Minutes
December 9, 2025

Page 2 ends

C. Proclamation Recognizing Administrative Services Director Ann Ritzma Upon Her Retirement
Mayor Mates on behalf of Council presented a proclamation to Ms. Ritzma .

D. Belmont Police Oath of Office
Taken out of order following Assemblymember Papan presentation.

Police Chief Stenquist introduced Officers Fernanda Ramirez and Xavier Childs.

Family members presented the officers with their badges, and City Clerk Plut administered the Oath of Office.

E. Belmont Centennial Planning Update
Parks and Recreation Director Shearer provided an update on ongoing planning efforts for Belmont’s upcoming centennial.

6. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Giuliano Carlini commented on the multimodal transportation needs in the City.

7. COUNCILMEMBER ANNOUNCEMENTS
Councilmembers announced the upcoming Santa at the Firehouse & Toy Drive event to be held at Belmont Fire Station 14 on December 11, 2025, including a sensory-friendly Santa visit followed by the traditional community toy drive event.

And that the Belmont Police Department Santa Parade scheduled for December 18, 2025. Additionally, the Mayor announced that applications are being accepted for various City Commissions, with a submission deadline of January 9, 2026.

RECESS: 8:27 PM
RECONVENED: 8:35 PM

8. CONSENT BUSINESS
A. Approval of Minutes November 25, 2025
B. Resolution 2025-78 to amend the City’s Master Employee Pay Schedule to maintain ongoing compliance with California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) requirements.

C. Resolution 2025-79 approving a Permanent Encroachment Agreement for the 800 Laurel Avenue townhome development project to allow for the relocation of an existing utility pole from the intersection of Laurel Avenue and Hill Street to the public right-of-way in front of Garden Hills Apartments at 941 Hill Street.

D. Motion to authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a contract with InCharge Energy, Inc. for the design, construction, and maintenance of electric vehicle chargers at three City sites in the amount of $301,367.33 and to authorize a 15 percent construction contingency in the amount of $45,000. 8 City Council Meeting Minutes
December 9, 2025

Page 3 ends

E. Ordinance 2025-1192 amending Belmont Zoning Ordinance Section 2 (Definitions), Section 4 (Residential), Section 5A (Corridor Mixed Use-CMU), Section 8 (Parking), Section 9.54 (Accessory Buildings), Sections 10 (Procedures), Section 13 (Design Review), and Section 31 (Village) with such amendments related to implementation of the certified Housing Element, development standards in the Corridor Mixed Use District, consolidation of parking requirements into one section of the Belmont
F. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute an amendment to the Services Agreement with Good City Company for the completion of the Harbor Industrial Area Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report (EIR).

Brian Tsang commented on item 8E; Guiliano Carlini commented on item 8B.

ACTION: On a motion made by Vice Mayor Pang-Maganaris and seconded by Councilmember Latimerlo, the Consent Calendar was approved by a roll call vote of 5-0, with the exception of Item F, from which Councilmember Latimerlo recused herself due to her residence bring within 500 feet in proximity to the project.

9. PUBLIC HEARINGS (none)

10. GENERAL BUSINESS
City Manager Oskoui introduced the Year in Review
A. Appointment of Vice Mayor and Council Intergovernmental Assignments for Calendar Year 2026
City Manager Oskoui introduced the item. City Clerk Plut presented the staff report regarding appointment of the Vice Mayor for 2026, intergovernmental assignments, and consideration of an Ad Hoc Housing & Long-Range Planning Subcommittee.

ACTION: On a motion made by and seconded by Councilmember Cathy Jordan was appointed Vice Mayor for Calendar Year 2026 by a roll vote (5-0).

Council reviewed the City Council Intergovernmental Assignments for Calendar Year 2026 no appoint were changed. Discussion ensued regarding the formation of a City Council Ad Hoc Housing & Long-Range Planning Subcommittee, including potential impacts on staff workload.

ACTION: On a motion made by Councilmember Latimerlo and seconded by Councilmember Pang-Maganaris, Council approved the formation of the City Council Ad Hoc Housing & Long-Range Planning Subcommittee and appointed Councilmembers Latimerlo and Jordan to serve on the subcommittee by a roll call vote (5-0).

9 City Council Meeting Minutes
December 9, 2025

Page 4 ends

B. Reappointment to Mosquito and Vector Control District City Clerk Plut introduced the item, noting that the City Council should discuss and decide whether to reappoint Chuck Cotten to the San Mateo County Mosquito and Vector Control District and determine whether the appointment should be for a two-year or four-year term.

Council discussion ensued regarding the length of the term.

ACTION: On a motion made by Councilmember Latimerlo and seconded by Councilmember Jordan, Chuck Cotten was reappointed to the San Mateo County Mosquito and Vector Control District for a four-year term by a roll call vote of 5-0.

11. BRIEF VERBAL REPORTS FROM MEMBERS AND STAFF
A. Verbal report from Councilmembers on Intergovernmental (IGR) and Subcommittee Assignments
Councilmembers reported on their assignments.

B. Verbal report from City Manager
City Manager Oskoui extended Holiday wishes to Council, staff and the Belmont Community.

12. MATTERS OF INTEREST/CLARIFICATION - none

13. ADJOURNMENT at 9:15 PM
Submitted by,
Jozi Plut, City Clerk
Meeting was video recorded.
10 FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT - OCTOBER 31, 2025

HIGHLIGHTS

PERFORMANCE

AT A GLANCE
REPORT
• General Fund balance increased
compared to prior YTD

FUND RECAP AT A GLANCE REPORT
Notable Fund Balance Increase compared to prior YTD:
•General Fund
•Development Services
•Belmont Fire Protection District
• Sewer Collection System
• Sewer Treatment
• Fleet and Equipment Management
Notable Fund Balance Decrease compared to prior YTD:
• Affordable Housing Successor

CASH DISBURSEMENTS &

PURCHASE ORDER ACTIVITY
REPORT
•Amounts equal to and above $50,000

BUDGET VARIANCE
REPORT
• Management Discussion & Analysis
• Tax Trends
This report contains financial information which has not been reviewed or audited by an independent auditor, does not reflect the application of generally accepted accounting principles in all instances and is subject to future revision. This report has not been prepared with a view to informing an investment decision in any of the City’s bonds, notes or other obligations. Any projections, plans or other forward-looking statements included in this report are subject to a variety of uncertainties that could cause any actual plans or results to differ materially from any such statement. The information herein is not intended to be used by investors or potential investors in considering the purchase or sale of the City’s bonds, notes or other obligations and investors and potential investors should rely only on information filed by the City on the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board’s Electronic Municipal Market Access System for municipal securities disclosures and website, maintained on the World Wide Web at https://emma.msrb.org/
These financial reports are designed to provide a general overview of the City of Belmont’s interim finances. Questions concerning any information provided in these reports should be addressed to [email protected] or for additional information regarding the City’s financial activities, including past award winning audited financial statements, transparency efforts and best practices please visit the City at www.belmont.gov.
11 City of Belmont
Performance at a Glance
Results for the Period Ended October 31, 2025
(000's)
6/30/2016 2016 $9,177 Audited
6/30/2017 2017 $11,128 Audited
6/30/2018 2018 $11,325 Audited
6/30/2019 2019 $14,846 Audited
6/30/2020 2020 $13,637 Audited
6/30/2021 2021 $13,398 Audited
6/30/2022 2022 $18,013 Audited
6/30/2023 2023 $26,586 Audited
6/30/2024 2024 $31,003 Audited
6/30/2025 2025 $34,416 Audited
10/31/2025 2026 $32,661 Unaudited
* excludes Measure I
\0
Fund Balance - YTD Fund Deficits
As shown on the Fund Recap at a Glance (page 3), the Library Bond Debt Service Fund and Recreation Fund have deficits and are expected to be eliminated in a future period.

The General Fund balance is $32.7 million, a decrease of $1.8 million compared to the amount at the prior fiscal year end. This is primarily due to the timing of semi-annual property tax receipts received in December and April.

General Fund
General Fund Balance Trend*
$0 $20 $40 $60 $80
Budget
Expenditures
Operating
Expenditures
Budget
Revenues
Operating
Revenues
All Funds Revenues & Expenditures
YTD Comparison (in millions)
43%
46%
1%
5%
5%
Capital Improvement Plan
Streets
Sewer
Technology
Recreational Facilities
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
General Fund Balance Trend
(in million)
2 12
Audited Unaudited PY YTD
Fund Fund Balance YTD YTD PY YTD YTD YTD PY YTD Fund Balance Fund Balance Fund Name 06/30/25 Budget Actual (Under) % Actual Budget Actual Under % Actual 10/31/25 10/31/2024 (1) (2) Over (3) (Over) (1)+(2)-(3)

GENERAL FUND
101 General 34,416 7,063 11,000 (3,937) 64% 6,920 11,530 8,818 2,712 76% 7,927 32,661 29,996 102 Measure I 3,599 835 367 (468) 44% 392 2,332 79 2,253 3% 2,639 3,887 2,217

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
205 Recreation 609 1,407 611 (796) 43% 619 1,428 1,515 (87) 106% 1,357 (295) (341) 206 Library Maintenance & Operation 211 216 1 (215) 0% 8 191 203 (12) 106% 128 9 656 207 Athletic Field Maintenance 446 62 47 (15) 76% 83 115 39 76 34% 53 454 421 208 City Tree 230 5 5 0 100% 4 16 13 3 81% 11 222 245
209 Senior Services Donation 105 4 4 0 100% 8 5 0 5 0% 0 109 104 210 Development Services 2,814 1,912 2,518 606 132% 2,069 2,187 1,920 267 88% 2,084 3,412 2,006 212 General Plan Maintenance 854 419 182 (237) 43% 157 599 300 299 50% 309 736 1,341 223 Belmont Fire Protection District 31,502 6,633 911 (5,722) 14% 549 5,070 8,530 (3,460) 168% 7,415 23,883 19,016 225 Police Grants and Donations 35 0 0 0 N/A 1 8 0 8 0% 0 35 36227 Supplemental Law Enforcement 166 64 6 (58) 9% 103 72 69 3 96% 30 103 144 231 Street Maintenance 1,988 969 315 (654) 33% 469 1,017 958 59 94% 836 1,345 998 232 RMRA Street Project 798 252 206 (46) 82% 200 506 573 (67) 113% 152 431 545 233 Measure W 2,618 171 95 (76) 56% 89 983 430 553 44% 0 2,283 2,384 234 Street Improvements 3,210 373 270 (103) 72% 280 1,140 12 1,128 1% 98 3,468 3,117 237 Traffic Impact 511 75 12 (63) 16% 1 0 0 0 N/A 0 523 101 239 Public Art 438 16 115 99 719% 4 87 0 87 0% 0 553 424 275 Affordable Housing Successor 4,034 221 42 (179) 19% 64 654 133 521 20% 162 3,943 5,958 277 Inclusionary Housing 3,541 14 11 (3) 79% 12 0 0 0 N/A 0 3,552 3,266 Total Special Revenue 54,111 12,813 5,351 (7,462) 42% 4,720 14,078 14,695 (617) 104% 12,635 44,767 40,422

CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS
308 General Facilities 581 8 6 (2) 75% 6 201 58 143 29% 2 529 625 310 Infrastructure 2,383 31 25 (6) 81% 22 825 1 824 0% (172) 2,407 2,485 312 Comcast PEG Program 364 21 4 (17) 19% 4 15 0 15 0% 0 368 425 341 Planned Park 482 142 5 (137) 4% 8 232 0 232 0% 1 487 1,091 342 Park Impact 1,083 20 23 3 115% 7 364 0 364 0% 0 1,106 687 343 Open Space 54 1 1 0 100% 1 37 0 37 0% 53 55 52399 Capital Improvement Projects 2,705 17,999 2,968 (15,031) 16% 3,247 19,354 2,943 16,411 15% 4,329 2,730 2,210 704 Special Assessment Districts 341 4 3 (1) 75% 3 0 0 N/A 0 344 331 Total Capital Projects 7,995 18,226 3,035 (15,191) 17% 3,298 21,028 3,002 18,026 14% 4,213 8,028 7,906

DEBT SERVICE & OTHER FUNDS
406 Library Bond Debt Service 346 238 1 (237) 0% 3 326 568 (242) 174% 550 (221) (226) 501-505 Sewer Collection System 48,625 7,743 3,449 (4,294) 45% 6,499 11,610 7,828 3,782 67% 10,042 44,246 36,763 507 Sewer Treatment 30,304 1,162 30 (1,132) 3% 50 1,437 2,763 (1,326) 192% 2,458 27,571 26,426 525 Storm Drainage Enterprise 879 706 177 (529) 25% 214 1,107 685 422 62% 413 371 1,207 530 Solid Waste Management 2,370 259 191 (68) 74% 187 217 170 47 78% 182 2,391 2,115 570 Worker's Compensation 1,940 363 387 24 107% 346 312 788 (476) 253% 754 1,539 1,428571 Liability Insurance 3,233 379 1,075 696 284% 303 480 671 (191) 140% 683 3,637 2,944573 Fleet & Equipment Management 9,239 1,939 1,927 (12) 99% 1,715 2,175 1,550 625 71% 1,767 9,616 8,189 574 Facilities Management 925 1,076 1,110 34 103% 1,021 1,329 1,097 232 83% 989 938 398 575 Benefit Prefunding 1,627 534 511 (23) 96% 453 602 961 (359) 160% 292 1,177 1,474 Total Debt & Other 99,489 14,399 8,858 (5,541) 62% 10,791 19,595 17,081 1,514 87% 18,130 91,266 80,718Total All Funds $199,609 $57,273 $24,674 ($32,599) 43% $26,121 $68,563 $43,675 $23,888 64% $45,544 $180,608 $161,259Fund Types:

Variance
City of Belmont
Fund Recap at a Glance
Results for the Period Ended October 31, 2025
(000's)
General Fund - Used to account for and report all financial resources not accounted for and reported in another fund.Special Revenue Funds - Used to account for and report the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are restricted or committed to expenditure for specific purposes other than debt service or capital projects.

Capital Projects Funds - Used to account for and report financial resources that are restricted, committed, or assigned to expenditure for capital outlays, including the acquisition or construction of capital facilities and other capital assets.Debt Service & Other Funds - Includes funds used to account for and report financial resources that are restricted, committed, or assigned to expenditure for principal and interest; funds used to finance and account for special activities and services performed by a designated department for other departments in the City on a cost reimbursement basis; and funds to account for operations financed and operated in a manner similar to a private business enterprise with the intent that the cost of providing goods and services is primarily financed through user charges; and funds used to account for assets held by the City as an agent.

Variance
Revenues Expenditures
3 13
City of Belmont
Budget Variance Report
General Fund / All Other Funds
Results for the Period Ended October 31, 2025
(000's)
General Fund All Other Funds
Year to Date (YTD) Annual PY YTD Year to Date (YTD) Annual PY YTD Budget Actual Variance % Budget Actual Budget Actual Variance % Budget Actual

REVENUES
Taxes 7,792 4,869 (2,923) 62% a 4,163 23,377 7,873 1,334 (6,539) 17% a 655 23,618 Licenses and permits 409 81 (328) 20% b 352 1,227 797 1,114 317 140% 2,392 1,173 Intergovernmental 140 166 26 119% 420 181 4,082 463 (3,619) 11% f 569 12,245 Charge for services 1,571 1,448 (123) 92% c 1,393 4,714 13,623 6,691 (6,932) 49% g 5,836 40,869 Fines and forfeits 38 29 (9) 76% 113 29 - - - N/A - -
456 645 (189) 71% d 796 1,934 2,149 1,393 (756) 65% d 1,869 6,447 Miscellaneous 107 15 (92) 14% 321 6 188 1,325 1,137 705% 563 94 Transfers in 298 - (298) 0% e - 894 17,561 5,291 (12,270) 30% e 8,998 52,684 Total Revenues 11,000 7,064 (3,936) 64% 33,000 6,920 46,273 17,611 (28,662) 38% 138,818 19,201

EXPENDITURES
General Government 2,786 2,436 (350) 87% 8,359 2,349 3,063 3,956 893 129% h 9,188 3,457 Public Safety 5,808 5,410 (398) 93% 17,425 4,732 5,026 8,226 3,200 164% i 15,078 7,479 Streets and Utilities - - - N/A 0 0 23,861 8,566 (15,295) 36% 71,583 10,037 Culture and Recreation 1,035 972 (63) 94% 3,105 846 3,883 2,971 (912) 77% 11,648 2,636 Urban Redevelopment - - - N/A 0 0 2,716 1,805 (911) 66% 8,147 2,031 Non Departmental - - - N/A 0 0 537 32 (505) 6% 1,610 94 Debt Service - - - N/A 0 0 1,988 4,012 2,024 202% j 2,885 5,965 Transfers out 1,900 - (1,900) 0% 5,700 0 15,959 5,291 (10,668) 33% 47,878 8,998 Total Expenditures 11,529 8,818 (2,711) 76% 34,589 7,927 57,033 34,859 (22,174) 61% 171,097 37,617 ($529) ($1,754) ($1,589) ($1,007) ($10,760) ($17,248) ($32,279) ($18,416) Management Discussion and Analysis
(Items with unfavorable budget variance more than $0.1 million) Revenues
Expenditures

EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER/
(UNDER) EXPENDITURES
a) Taxes - The budget variance is primarily due to the timing of semi-annual property tax receipts received in December and April.

Use of money and property
b) Licenses and Permits - The budget variance is primarily due to the Business License Tax Revenue. All businesses' licensing periods (i.e., the “tax period”) have transitioned to January 1 to December 31 and the majority of the revenue will be received at license renewal in December/January. c) Charges for Services (General Fund) - The budget variance is primarily due to the quarterly fire prevention and protection fee, which will be received in a future reporting period. f) Intergovermental - Grant revenue will be received and reported in a future reporting period.

Trends
g) Charges for Services (Other Funds) - The Sewer User Fee (Collection & Treatment) is included as part of the City's Property Tax bill to be received semi-annually, typically in December and April.
h) General Government - The variance is due to annual insurance premiums, pension, and OPEB contributions paid in July. i) Public Safety - The annual BSCFD contribution of $2.1M was made in July, and the second quarter payment of $2.6M to San Mateo Consolidated Fire Department was made in September.
j) Debt Service - Annual debt service on bonds were paid in July. e) Transfers In - Transfer amount was budgeted based on full CIP commitments. Actual expenditures and CIP transfers are recorded as the project progresses, and any remaining budget will be carried forward to the next fiscal year or released back to the funding source upon project completion. d) Use of Money and Property - The budget variance is primarily due quarterly interest revenues which will be posted in December. -$600
-$400
-$200
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Thousands
Sales Taxes & TOT - Monthly Comparison
Sales Taxes FY 25 Sales Taxes FY 26 TOT FY 25 TOT FY 26 $0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 Thousands
Major General Fund Taxes - 10-year Trends
Prop Tax Sales Taxes TOT
4 14
Vendor Description Date No. Amount
EDD PAYROLL TAXES PPE 10/17/25 10/17/25 DAJ000010050 51,953.82 MISSIONSQUARE DEF COMP ACCT#302442 10/6/25 DAJ000010054 59,350.64 MISSIONSQUARE DEF COMP ACCT#302442 10/20/25 DAJ000010057 60,149.22 SM COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 2025 PROPRTY TAXES 10/27/25 DAJ000010058 155,189.14 CALPERS COB CONTRIBUTION PPE 10/03/25 10/6/25 DAJ000010059 141,932.06 CALPERS PERS HEALTH PREMIUM OCTOBER 10/9/25 DAJ000010060 229,300.46 CALPERS COB CONTRIBUTION PPE 10/17/25 10/27/25 DAJ000010061 143,693.22 ADP WAGE PPE 10/25/25 ADP WAGE PPE 10/25/25 10/17/25 DAJ000010075 502,819.92 ADP TAX PPE 10/25/25 ADP TAX PPE 10/25/25 10/31/25 DAJ000010078 120,560.27 ADP WAGE PPE 9/27/25 ADP WAGE PPE 9/27/25 10/3/25 DAJ000010065 480,866.68 ADP TAX PPE 09/27/25 ADP TAX PPE 09/27/25 10/3/25 DAJ000010068 116,194.62 ADP WAGE PPE 10/11/25 ADP WAGE PPE 10/11/25 10/17/25 DAJ000010071 529,852.27 ADP TAX PPE 10/11/25 ADP TAX PPE 10/11/25 10/17/25 DAJ000010074 139,552.74 JUL - SEP 25 LAIF INTEREST JUL - SEP 25 LAIF INTEREST 10/15/25 IAJ000010082 819,160.82 JUL - SEP 25 LAIF INTEREST JUL - SEP 25 LAIF INTEREST 10/15/25 IAJ000010083 818,424.39 PA2025-0054 Correction PA2025-0054 Correction 10/31/25 DAJ000010102 151,442.00 Total Disbursements in Excess of $50,000 4,520,442.27 $ Total Count 16
Vendor Description Date No. Amount
MNS ENGINEERS INC 2026 SANITARY SEWER REHAB 10/1/25 26 00048 228,720.00 EYEP SOLUTIONS R7407 APPLIANCE 4NODE 48 T 10/14/25 26 00053 74,994.00 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 9-BIZHUB C451I-45PM 10/29/25 26 00059 66,612.15 MATRIX CONSULTING GROUP CAP/COMP FEE STUDY 10/29/25 26 00060 57,000.00 Total Purchase Orders Issued in Excess of $50,000 427,326.15 $ Total Count 4
Disbursements Amounts Equal to $50,000 and Above
Purchase Order Amounts Equal to $50,000 and Above
City of Belmont
Disbursements & Purchase Order Activity Report
Results for the Period Ended October 31, 2025
5 15
Beginning Balance Ending Balance
September 30, 2025 Receipts Disbursements October 31, 2025 City of Belmont $ 129,255,774.72 $ 5,001,638.36 $ (5,058,911.71) $ 129,198,501.37 Belmont Fire Protection District 23,386,040.50 699,016.24 (56,107.28) $ 24,028,949.46 Total $ 152,641,815.22 $ 5,700,654.60 $ (5,115,018.99) $ 153,227,450.83 -
Deposit Investments Pool Total
City of Belmont & Belmont Fire Protection District $ 1,504,630.91 $ 151,722,819.92 $ 153,227,450.83 -
Respectfully Submitted,
s/b Grace Castaneda
Grace Castaneda
City Treasurer
I certify that this report accurately reflects all investments of City of Belmont and Belmont Fire Protection District, and is in conformance with the adopted Investment Policy mandated by Government Code 53646. Furthermore, I certify to the best of my knowledge, sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the Agency's budgeted expenditure requirement for the next six months.

CITY OF BELMONT

TREASURER'S REPORT
October 31, 2025
Balance Summary
Agency Receipts and Disbursements Summary
treasurer report 10-2025

Page 1 of 2 ends

16 Investment Type Issuer
Maturity
Date Par Amount Current Market Value Interest Total
Investment
Period Rate
Pricing
Source Manager
Deposit
General Account Wells Fargo $ 1,504,630.91 $ 1,504,630.91 Bank Bank Investments:

L.A.I.F.-POOL State of California Daily 148,016,790.71 148,302,401.10 511,891.40 90 days 4.150% LAIF LAIF L.A.I.F.-BONDS State of California Daily 3,706,029.21 3,713,180.29 12,816.68 90 days 4.150% LAIF LAIF Total $ 153,227,450.83 $ 153,520,212.30 $ 524,708.09
s/b Grace Castaneda
S/B John Violet
Investment Detail

CITY OF BELMONT

TREASURER'S REPORT
October 31, 2025
Oct-24 Nov-24 Dec-24 Jan-25 Feb-25 Mar-25 Apr-25 May-25 Jun-25 Jul-25 Aug-25 Sep-25 Oct-25 LAIF-POOL 131,234,515 132,734,515 145,434,515 145,434,515 148,989,576 148,989,576 148,630,223 148,630,223 148,630,223 149,987,206 149,987,206 148,501,206 148,016,791 LAIF-BOND 5,160,156 5,099,509 5,099,509 5,099,509 4,433,156 4,433,156 4,485,737 4,485,737 3,618,737 3,665,995 3,665,995 3,665,995 3,706,029 INTEREST RATE 4.518% 4.477% 4.434% 4.434% 4.333% 4.313% 4.281% 4.272% 4.269% 4.258% 4.251% 4.212% 4.150%

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00%

6.00%

7.00%
$0
$20,000,000
$40,000,000
$60,000,000
$80,000,000
$100,000,000
$120,000,000
$140,000,000
$160,000,000
City of Belmont Investment Portfolio Trends

Page 2 of 2 ends

17 FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT - NOVEMBER 30, 2025

HIGHLIGHTS

PERFORMANCE

AT A GLANCE
REPORT
• General Fund balance increased
compared to prior YTD

FUND RECAP AT A GLANCE REPORT
Notable Fund Balance Increase compared to prior YTD:
•General Fund
•Measure I
•Development Services
•Belmont Fire Protection District
• Sewer Collection System
•Fleet & Equipment Management
Notable Fund Balance Decrease compared to prior YTD:
• Affordable Housing Successor

CASH DISBURSEMENTS &

PURCHASE ORDER ACTIVITY
REPORT
•Amounts equal to and above $50,000

BUDGET VARIANCE
REPORT
• Management Discussion & Analysis
• Tax Trends
This report contains financial information which has not been reviewed or audited by an independent auditor, does not reflect the application of generally accepted accounting principles in all instances and is subject to future revision. This report has not been prepared with a view to informing an investment decision in any of the City’s bonds, notes or other obligations. Any projections, plans or other forward-looking statements included in this report are subject to a variety of uncertainties that could cause any actual plans or results to differ materially from any such statement. The information herein is not intended to be used by investors or potential investors in considering the purchase or sale of the City’s bonds, notes or other obligations and investors and potential investors should rely only on information filed by the City on the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board’s Electronic Municipal Market Access System for municipal securities disclosures and website, maintained on the World Wide Web at https://emma.msrb.org/
These financial reports are designed to provide a general overview of the City of Belmont’s interim finances. Questions concerning any information provided in these reports should be addressed to [email protected] or for additional information regarding the City’s financial activities, including past award winning audited financial statements, transparency efforts and best practices please visit the City at www.belmont.gov.
18 City of Belmont
Performance at a Glance
Results for the Period Ended November 30, 2025
(000's)
6/30/2016 2016 $9,177 Audited
6/30/2017 2017 $11,128 Audited
6/30/2018 2018 $11,325 Audited
6/30/2019 2019 $14,846 Audited
6/30/2020 2020 $13,637 Audited
6/30/2021 2021 $13,398 Audited
6/30/2022 2022 $18,013 Audited
6/30/2023 2023 $26,586 Audited
6/30/2024 2024 $31,003 Audited
6/30/2025 2025 $34,416 Audited
11/30/2025 2026 $32,512 Unaudited
* excludes Measure I
\0
Fund Balance - YTD Fund Deficits
As shown on the Fund Recap at a Glance (page 3), the Library Bond Debt Service Fund, Library Maintenance & Operation Fund, and Recreation Fund have deficits and are expected to be eliminated in a future period.

The General Fund balance is $32.5 million, a decrease of $1.9 million compared to the amount at the prior fiscal year end. This is primarily due to the timing of semi-annual property tax receipts received in December and April.

General Fund
General Fund Balance Trend*
$0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100
Budget
Expenditures
Operating
Expenditures
Budget
Revenues
Operating
Revenues
All Funds Revenues & Expenditures
YTD Comparison (in millions)
43%
46%
1%
5%
5%
Capital Improvement Plan
Streets
Sewer
Technology
Recreational Facilities
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
General Fund Balance Trend
(in million)
2 19
Audited Unaudited PY YTD
Fund Fund Balance YTD YTD PY YTD YTD YTD PY YTD Fund Balance Fund Balance Fund Name 06/30/25 Budget Actual (Under) % Actual Budget Actual Under % Actual 11/30/25 11/30/2024 (1) (2) Over (3) (Over) (1)+(2)-(3)

GENERAL FUND
101 General 34,416 8,976 13,750 (4,774) 65% 8,947 14,412 10,880 3,532 75% 10,514 32,512 29,436 102 Measure I 3,599 1,043 598 (445) 57% 598 2,915 141 2,774 5% 2,698 4,056 2,363

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
205 Recreation 609 1,759 719 (1,040) 41% 743 1,785 1,806 (21) 101% 1,693 (478) (553) 206 Library Maintenance & Operation 211 269 1 (268) 0% 8 238 241 (3) 101% 153 (29) 631 207 Athletic Field Maintenance 446 78 48 (30) 62% 84 143 44 99 31% 61 450 413 208 City Tree 230 6 5 (1) 83% 5 21 17 4 81% 19 218 238209 Senior Services Donation 105 6 4 (2) 67% 8 7 0 7 0% 0 109 104 210 Development Services 2,814 2,390 2,912 522 122% 2,431 2,734 2,431 303 89% 2,663 3,295 1,788212 General Plan Maintenance 854 524 219 (305) 42% 178 749 349 400 47% 415 724 1,256 223 Belmont Fire Protection District 31,502 8,291 1,867 (6,424) 23% 2,031 6,338 8,569 (2,231) 135% 7,452 24,800 20,462 225 Police Grants and Donations 35 1 0 (1) 0% 1 10 0 10 0% 0 35 36 227 Supplemental Law Enforcement 166 80 6 (74) 8% 119 90 83 7 92% 41 89 150 231 Street Maintenance 1,988 1,211 403 (808) 33% 620 1,271 1,172 99 92% 1,048 1,219 937232 RMRA Street Project 798 315 282 (33) 90% 272 633 595 38 94% 202 485 568 233 Measure W 2,618 214 132 (82) 62% 89 1,229 1,236 (7) 101% 86 1,514 2,298 234 Street Improvements 3,210 466 352 (114) 76% 391 1,425 15 1,410 1% 105 3,547 3,221237 Traffic Impact 511 94 12 (82) 13% 1 0 0 0 N/A 0 523 101 239 Public Art 438 20 115 95 575% 4 108 0 108 0% 0 553 424 275 Affordable Housing Successor 4,034 277 44 (233) 16% 71 817 149 668 18% 183 3,929 5,944277 Inclusionary Housing 3,541 18 11 (7) 61% 12 0 0 0 N/A 0 3,552 3,266 Total Special Revenue 54,111 16,019 7,132 (8,887) 45% 7,068 17,598 16,707 891 95% 14,121 44,536 41,284

CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS
308 General Facilities 581 10 6 (4) 60% 6 252 59 193 23% 2 528 625 310 Infrastructure 2,383 38 25 (13) 66% 22 1,031 218 813 21% (172) 2,190 2,485 312 Comcast PEG Program 364 26 4 (22) 15% 4 19 0 19 0% 0 368 425 341 Planned Park 482 178 5 (173) 3% 8 290 0 290 0% 2 487 1,090 342 Park Impact 1,083 25 23 (2) 92% 7 455 1 454 0% 0 1,105 687 343 Open Space 54 2 1 (1) 50% 1 46 0 46 0% 53 55 52399 Capital Improvement Projects 2,705 22,499 4,630 (17,869) 21% 4,301 24,193 5,007 19,186 21% 5,198 2,328 2,395 704 Special Assessment Districts 341 6 3 (3) 50% 3 0 0 N/A 0 344 331 Total Capital Projects 7,995 22,784 4,697 (18,087) 21% 4,352 26,286 5,285 21,001 20% 5,083 7,407 8,091

DEBT SERVICE & OTHER FUNDS
406 Library Bond Debt Service 346 298 1 (297) 0% 3 408 569 (161) 139% 557 (222) (234) 501-505 Sewer Collection System 48,625 9,679 3,462 (6,217) 36% 6,517 14,512 8,693 5,819 60% 11,025 43,394 35,798 507 Sewer Treatment 30,304 1,452 30 (1,422) 2% 50 1,797 3,283 (1,486) 183% 2,579 27,051 26,305 525 Storm Drainage Enterprise 879 882 236 (646) 27% 345 1,384 840 544 61% 625 275 1,126 530 Solid Waste Management 2,370 323 246 (77) 76% 240 271 214 57 79% 232 2,402 2,119570 Worker's Compensation 1,940 454 455 1 100% 442 389 788 (399) 203% 755 1,607 1,524571 Liability Insurance 3,233 474 1,159 685 245% 370 600 706 (106) 118% 700 3,686 2,994 573 Fleet & Equipment Management 9,239 2,424 2,388 (36) 99% 2,124 2,997 1,936 1,061 65% 2,101 9,691 8,275 574 Facilities Management 925 1,345 1,367 22 102% 1,272 1,661 1,294 367 78% 1,144 998 494575 Benefit Prefunding 1,627 668 621 (47) 93% 618 752 1,047 (295) 139% 404 1,201 1,527 Total Debt & Other 99,489 17,999 9,965 (8,034) 55% 11,981 24,771 19,370 4,151 78% 20,122 90,084 79,928Total All Funds $199,609 $71,595 $31,368 ($40,227) 44% $32,946 $85,982 $52,383 $32,349 61% $52,538 $178,594 $161,103Fund Types:

Variance
City of Belmont
Fund Recap at a Glance
Results for the Period Ended November 30, 2025
(000's)
General Fund - Used to account for and report all financial resources not accounted for and reported in another fund.Special Revenue Funds - Used to account for and report the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are restricted or committed to expenditure for specific purposes other than debt service or capital projects.

Variance
Revenues Expenditures
3 20
City of Belmont
Budget Variance Report
General Fund / All Other Funds
Results for the Period Ended November 30, 2025
(000's)
General Fund All Other Funds
Year to Date (YTD) Annual PY YTD Year to Date (YTD) Annual PY YTD Budget Actual Variance % Budget Actual Budget Actual Variance % Budget Actual

REVENUES
Taxes 9,741 6,342 (3,399) 65% a 5,773 23,377 9,840 2,637 (7,203) 27% a 2,413 23,618 Licenses and permits 511 113 (398) 22% b 425 1,227 997 1,362 365 137% 2,392 1,355 Intergovernmental 175 228 53 130% 420 203 5,102 873 (4,229) 17% g 1,268 12,245 Charge for services 1,964 1,727 (237) 88% c 1,644 4,714 17,029 8,093 (8,936) 48% h 7,341 40,869 Fines and forfeits 47 37 (10) 79% 113 40 - - - N/A - -
514 806 (292) 64% d 853 1,934 2,686 1,416 (1,270) 53% d 1,902 6,447 Miscellaneous 134 15 (119) 11% e 9 321 234 1,327 1,093 567% 563 164 Transfers in 373 - (373) 0% f - 894 21,951 6,683 (15,268) 30% f 9,551 52,684 Total Revenues 13,751 8,975 (4,776) 65% 33,000 8,947 57,840 22,392 (35,448) 39% 138,818 24,000

EXPENDITURES
General Government 3,483 3,005 (478) 86% 8,359 3,122 3,828 4,463 635 117% i 9,188 3,926 Public Safety 7,261 6,679 (582) 92% 17,425 6,274 6,282 8,279 1,997 132% j 15,078 7,527 Streets and Utilities - - - N/A 0 0 29,826 12,281 (17,545) 41% 71,583 12,256 Culture and Recreation 1,294 1,196 (98) 92% 3,105 1,117 4,853 3,536 (1,317) 73% 11,648 3,199 Urban Redevelopment - - - N/A 0 0 3,395 2,217 (1,178) 65% 8,147 2,583 Non Departmental - - - N/A 0 0 949 32 (917) 3% 2,277 96 Debt Service - - - N/A 0 0 2,485 4,012 1,527 161% k 2,885 5,965 Transfers out 2,375 - (2,375) 0% 5,700 0 19,949 6,683 (13,266) 34% 47,878 9,551 Total Expenditures 14,413 10,880 (3,533) 75% 34,589 10,513 71,567 41,503 (30,064) 58% 171,764 42,023 ($662) ($1,905) ($1,589) ($1,566) ($13,727) ($19,111) ($32,946) ($18,023) Management Discussion and Analysis
(Items with unfavorable budget variance more than $0.1 million) Revenues
Expenditures

OVER/ (UNDER)

EXPENDITURES
a) Taxes - The budget variance is primarily due to the timing of semi-annual property tax receipts received in December and April.

Use of money and property
b) Licenses and Permits - The budget variance is primarily due to the Business License Tax Revenue. All businesses' licensing periods (i.e., the “tax period”) have transitioned to January 1 to December 31 and the majority of the revenue will be received at license renewal in December/January. c) Charges for Services (General Fund) - The budget variance is primarily due to the quarterly fire prevention and protection fee, which will be received in a future reporting period. g) Intergovermental - Grant revenue will be received and reported in a future reporting period.

Trends
h) Charges for Services (All Other Funds) - The Sewer User Fee (Collection & Treatment) is included as part of the City's Property Tax bill to be received semi-annually, typically in December and April.
i) General Government - The variance is due to annual insurance premiums, pension, and OPEB contributions paid in July. j) Public Safety - The annual BSCFD contribution of $2.1M was made in July, and the second quarter payment of $2.6M to San Mateo Consolidated Fire Department was made in September.
k) Debt Service - Annual debt service on bonds were paid in July. f) Transfers In - Transfer amount was budgeted based on full CIP commitments. Actual expenditures and CIP transfers are recorded as the project progresses, and any remaining budget will be carried forward to the next fiscal year or released back to the funding source upon project completion. d) Use of Money and Property - The budget variance is primarily due to quarterly interest revenues which will be posted in December. e) Miscellaneous - The budget variance is primarily due to the timing of the annual Crystal Springs Uplands School (CSUS) Public Service Fee, which will be received in a future reporting period.
-$600
-$400
-$200
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Thousands
Sales Taxes & TOT - Monthly Comparison
Sales Taxes FY 25 Sales Taxes FY 26 TOT FY 25 TOT FY 26 $0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 Thousands
Major General Fund Taxes - 10-year Trends
Prop Tax Sales Taxes TOT
4 21
Vendor Description Date No. Amount
MISSIONSQUARE DEF COMP ACCT#302442 11/3/25 DAJ000010124 59,102.52 MISSIONSQUARE DEF COMP ACCT#302442 11/17/25 DAJ000010127 58,642.09 CALPERS COB CONTRIBUTION PPE 11/14/25 11/28/25 DAJ000010132 141,218.57 CALPERS COB CONTRIBUTION PPE 10/31/25 11/5/25 DAJ000010128 143,883.55 CALPERS HEALTH PREMIUM NOVEMBER 11/12/25 DAJ000010129 236,456.62 ADP WAGE PPE 11/08/25 ADP WAGE PPE 11/08/25 11/14/25 DAJ000010146 496,016.91 ADP TAX PPE 11/08/25 ADP TAX PPE 11/08/25 11/14/25 DAJ000010149 118,823.72 ADP WAGE PPE 11/22/25 ADP WAGE PPE 11/22/25 11/28/25 DAJ000010150 496,362.74 ADP TAX PPE 11/22/25 ADP TAX PPE 11/22/25 11/28/25 DAJ000010153 121,829.01 Total Disbursements in Excess of $50,000 1,872,335.73 $ Total Count 9
Vendor Description Date No. Amount
GHIRARDELLI ASSOCIATES TO#3 815 BELMONT AVE REVIE 11/10/25 26 00063 74,934.00 SATELLITE PAINTING INC COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER 11/10/25 26 00064 50,600.00 Total Purchase Orders Issued in Excess of $50,000 125,534.00 $ Total Count 2
Disbursements Amounts Equal to $50,000 and Above
Purchase Order Amounts Equal to $50,000 and Above
City of Belmont
Disbursements & Purchase Order Activity Report
Results for the Period Ended November 30, 2025
5 22
Beginning Balance Ending Balance
October 31, 2025 Receipts Disbursements November 30, 2025 City of Belmont 129,198,501.37 $ 3,206,057.97 $ (5,415,817.57) $ 126,988,741.77 $ Belmont Fire Protection District 24,028,949.46 956,242.41 (183,359.33) 24,801,832.54 $ Total $ 4,162,300.38 153,227,450.83 $ (5,599,176.90) $ 151,790,574.31 $ -
Deposit Investments Pool Total
City of Belmont & Belmont Fire Protection District $ 151,554,819.92 235,754.39 $ 151,790,574.31 $ -
Respectfully Submitted,
s/b Grace Castaneda
Grace Castaneda
City Treasurer
I certify that this report accurately reflects all investments of City of Belmont and Belmont Fire Protection District, and is in conformance with the adopted Investment Policy mandated by Government Code 53646. Furthermore, I certify to the best of my knowledge, sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the Agency's budgeted expenditure requirement for the next six months.

CITY OF BELMONT

TREASURER'S REPORT
November 30, 2025
Balance Summary
Agency Receipts and Disbursements Summary
treasurer report 11-2025

Page 1 of 2 ends

23 Investment Type Issuer
Maturity
Date Par Amount Current Market Value Interest Total
Investment
Period Rate
Pricing
Source Manager
Deposit
General Account Wells Fargo 235,754.39 $ 235,754.39 $ Bank Bank Investments:

L.A.I.F.-POOL State of California Daily 147,848,790.71 148,134,076.93 504,657.21 90 days 4.096% LAIF LAIF L.A.I.F.-BONDS State of California Daily 3,706,029.21 3,713,180.29 12,649.91 90 days 4.096% LAIF LAIF Total 151,790,574.31 $ 152,083,011.61 $ 517,307.12 $
s/b Grace Castaneda
S/B John Violet
Investment Detail

CITY OF BELMONT

TREASURER'S REPORT
November 30, 2025
Nov-24 Dec-24 Jan-25 Feb-25 Mar-25 Apr-25 May-25 Jun-25 Jul-25 Aug-25 Sep-25 Oct-25 Nov-25 LAIF-POOL 132,734,515 145,434,515 145,434,515 148,989,576 148,989,576 148,630,223 148,630,223 148,630,223 149,987,206 149,987,206 148,501,206 148,016,791 147,848,791 LAIF-BOND 5,099,509 5,099,509 5,099,509 4,433,156 4,433,156 4,485,737 4,485,737 3,618,737 3,665,995 3,665,995 3,665,995 3,706,029 3,706,029 INTEREST RATE 4.477% 4.434% 4.434% 4.333% 4.313% 4.281% 4.272% 4.269% 4.258% 4.251% 4.212% 4.150% 4.096%

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00%

6.00%

7.00%
$0
$20,000,000
$40,000,000
$60,000,000
$80,000,000
$100,000,000
$120,000,000
$140,000,000
$160,000,000
City of Belmont Investment Portfolio Trends

Page 2 of 2 ends

Page 1 of 4 ends

Belmont Creek Restoration Project.docx

STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: January 27, 2026
Agency: City of Belmont
Staff Contact: Daniel Matthews, Assistant Civil Engineer, [email protected], (650)-637- 2985
Agenda Title: Belmont Creek Restoration Project - Accept construction and authorize issuance of Notice of Completion; initiate five-year habitat monitoring and maintenance plan project and authorize budget transfer.

Agenda Action: Resolution
Recommendation
Adopt a resolution (1) accepting the construction work and authorizing the issuance of a Notice of Completion for the Belmont Creek Restoration Project, City Contract Number 2024-6 35, including release of retention 35 days after recording of the Notice of Completion; and (2) initiate Belmont Creek Habitat Monitoring and Maintenance Plan and authorize budget transfer.

Strategic Focus Area
Infrastructure and Mobility
Background
Belmont Creek originates in City of Belmont and flows through the Harbor Industrial Area of San Mateo County along the border of San Carlos before reaching Belmont Slough and the San Francisco Bay. Over many years, Belmont Creek within Twin Pines Park degraded due to increased urban runoff, historical channelization, invasive species, and other factors. These conditions resulted in bank erosion, fallen trees, and loss of riparian vegetation and habitat, which impaired water quality and exacerbated downstream flooding.

In 2019, the Belmont Creek Restoration Project
was identified in City planning documents. In
2021, OneShoreline, the San Mateo County Flood
and Sea Level Rise Resiliency District,
successfully secured a $1,000,000 Proposition 68
Urban Streams Restoration Grant from the
California Department of Water Resources on
behalf of the City of Belmont. In June 2021, City
Council authorized the City Manager to accept the
grant funds and execute the grant agreement.

On March 8, 2022, City Council authorized the
City Manager to execute a funding agreement Figure 1 - Typical creek conditions prior to project including failed banks, impaired water quality.
25

Page 2 of 4 ends

Belmont Creek Restoration Project.docx
between Belmont, the City of San Carlos, and the County of San Mateo, for a combined amount of $600,000 from the three agencies, and approved a design contract with Restoration Design Group.

In November 2024, City Council authorized the City Manager to execute construction contracts for both tree removal work and creek restoration work, and to negotiate and execute Amendment No. 1 to the funding agreement between Belmont, City of San Carlos, and the County of San Mateo. The amendment increased the combined agency contribution from $600,000 to $2,265,000.

Tree removal work, which included of the removal of 52 hazardous and non-native trees, began in January and was completed in March. Creek Restoration Work was advertised for bid in February, and the construction contract was awarded to Hanford Applied Restoration and Construction in an amount of $1,764,341.50.

Analysis
Acceptance of Construction
Work began on June 15, 2025. Construction was
completed on schedule and in compliance with
all applicable environmental permits, despite an
approximate six-week work stoppage due to the
inadvertent discovery of archaeological
resources within the project area.

Three Contract Change Orders to Hanford’s
contract were approved during construction:
• Change Order No. 1 expanded the
restoration scope to meet the mitigation
requirements of the Belmont Creek
Detention Basin Project for $198,943.00.
• Change Order No. 2 addressed costs
related to the temporary work stoppage
resulting from the inadvertent discovery
of archaeological resources. Staff
directed the contractor to demobilize equipment where feasible to minimize costs, and extended shifts were required when construction resumed to ensure all work within the creek boundary was completed by the October 15 environmental permit deadline. The total cost of this change order is $65,557.76.
• Change Order No. 3 provided for the purchase and installation of interpretive signage to educate park visitors of the project to fulfill grant requirements in an amount of $5,160.88.

With the three change orders, the final construction contract totaled $2,034,023.14. This figure does not include design, construction management, or other project related services. Following substantial completion of the project, a ribbon cutting event was held on December 4, 2025 to welcome the public Figure 2 - Post-project conditions upstream of
pedestrian bridge, featuring placed log structures and
constructed riffles.
26

Page 3 of 4 ends

Belmont Creek Restoration Project.docx
back to the restored creek area.

Initiation of Required Five-Year Maintenance Project
While construction has been completed, additional work is required to satisfy environmental permits conditions, grant funding requirements, and long-term performance objectives of the restored creek corridor. The approved Habitat Monitoring and Maintenance Plan requires maintenance of planting and irrigation systems, as well as monitoring of site conditions, for a five-year period following construction.

To meet these requirements, staff determined that a qualified vendor is needed to perform regular maintenance activities. Following a solicitation process, Hanford Applied Restoration and Construction was identified as the most qualified firm to perform the work. The maintenance plan anticipates a higher level of effort during the first three years following construction, with estimated costs of $70,000 per year.

Maintenance during years four and five is anticipated to require a reduced level of effort with an estimated cost of $25,000 per year. In addition, the monitoring of the maintenance and site performance by Restoration Design Group is estimated to cost $58,700 over the five-year period. In total, the maintenance and monitoring project is estimated to be $298,900.

Because ongoing maintenance is a required component of the capital project, staff recommends initiating a new capital project titled “Belmont Creek Habitat Monitoring and Maintenance Plan” and transferring $298,900 in Measure I funds to support the estimated project costs. The requested Measure I funding is available and unencumbered in the 2025 Pavement Rehabilitation Project (Project 3117), which is coming in under budget and nearing substantial completion. Staff is requesting that the $298,900 currently budgeted under the 2025 Pavement Rehabilitation Project (Project 3117) be transferred to the Belmont Creek Habitat Monitoring and Maintenance Plan (Project 3246).

Alternatives

1. Take no action

2. Refer back to staff for additional information
Attachments
A. Resolution
B. Maintenance Proposal from Hanford Applied Restoration and Construction Fiscal Impact
☐ No Fiscal Impact
☒ Funding Source Confirmed:
$2,034,023.14 was budgeted into Twin Pines Park Belmont Creek Restoration Project, Phase One (Project 3218) for the construction phase of the project, including $820,000 in Proposition 68 Urban Streams Restoration Grant Funds,
$416,250 each from San Carlos and County of San Mateo, and $832,500 in Belmont Infrastructure Repair Fund dollars for a total of $1,665,000 from the three parties. Portions of these 27

Page 4 of 4 ends

Belmont Creek Restoration Project.docx
revenue sources went to construction support services such as construction management and monitoring. The requested
$298,900 in Measure I dollars for the Belmont Creek Habitat Monitoring and Maintenance Plan (Project 3246) is available and unencumbered in the 2025 Pavement Rehabilitation Project (Project 3117).

Source: Purpose: Public Outreach:

Staff Statutory/Contractual Requirement Posting of Agenda 28

Page 1 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026 –
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELMONT (1)

ACCEPTING THE CONSTRUCTION WORK AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, AND RELEASE OF RETENTION 35 DAYS AFTER

RECORDATION, FOR THE TWIN PINES PARK BELMONT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, CITY CONTRACT NUMBER 2024-638, AND (2) INITIATING THE

BELMONT CREEK HABITAT MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN AND

APPROVING THE RELATED BUDGET TRANSFER
WHEREAS, on November 26, 2024, the City Council authorized the City Manager to award a construction contract for the construction of the Twin Pines Park Belmont Creek Restoration Project (Phase One) for an amount not to exceed $2,135,000; and WHEREAS, following a competitive bidding process, the project was awarded to Hanford Applied Restoration and Construction in the amount of $1,764,341.50; and WHEREAS, during construction, three Contract Change Orders totaling $269,681.64 to expand the restoration scope to meet mitigation requirements associated with the Belmont Creek Detention Basin Project, address unforeseen delay costs related to the inadvertent discovery of archaeological resources, and provide for the purchase and installation of interpretive signage required by grant conditions; and
WHEREAS, ongoing maintenance and monitoring are required to satisfy environmental permit conditions, grant requirements, and long-term performance objectives for the Belmont Creek Restoration Project, and such maintenance is a required component of the original capital improvement project; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends initiating a new capital improvement project # 3246 titled “Belmont Creek Habitat Monitoring and Maintenance Plan” and transferring $298,900 in available and unencumbered Measure I funds from savings in the 2025 Pavement Rehabilitation Project (Project No. 3117) to fund the required maintenance and monitoring activities.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Belmont resolves as follows:

SECTION 1. Accepts the construction work for the Twin Pines Park Belmont Creek Restoration Project (Phase One) as complete.

SECTION 2. Authorizes the City Clerk to issue a Notice of Completion to Hanford Applied Restoration and Construction.

SECTION 3. Authorizes the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion with the San Mateo County Clerk-Recorder’s office for the Twin Pines Park Belmont Creek Restoration Project (Phase One), City Contract Number 2024-638.

SECTION 4. Authorizes initiation of the Belmont Creek Habitat and Maintenance Plan Project and approves transfer of $298,900 in Measure I funds from savings in the 2025 Pavement Rehabilitation Project (Project No. 3117) to support the new capital improvement project # 3246 29

Page 2 of 2 ends

titled “Belmont Creek Restoration Habitat and Maintenance Plan” for required maintenance and monitoring activities.
* * *
ADOPTED January 27, 2026 by the City of Belmont City Council by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

ATTEST:

City Clerk

Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney
30

Page 1 ends

Proposal Submittal
for

TWIN PINES MAINTENANCE
Prepared for
City of Belmont
Submission Date: December 3, 2025
POC: Teddy Hanford
Phone: (707) 292-0948
Fax: (707) 996-6601
Exhibit B
Exhibit A
31

Page 2 ends

775 Baywood Drive, Suite 207
Petaluma, CA 94954
(707) 996-6633
www.hanfordarc.com
[email protected]
CA LIC. 461167
Twin Pines Park Belmont Creek Restoration Maintenance
To: City of Belmont Hanford Contact: Teddy Hanford
1 Twin Pines Lane
Belmont, CA 94002
Phone:

Email:
707-292-0948
[email protected]
Attention: Sean Rose Date: 12/3/2025
Phone: (650) 226-6901 Revision 2
Email: [email protected] Quote valid for: 30 days Anticipated start: April 2026
Company Overview
Hanford Applied Restoration & Conservation (Hanford) is construction company that specializes in all aspects of ecological restoration project implementation. Hanford has extensive experience working under the various permits issued by CDFW, RWQCB, and USACE. Our crews often work in environments that are home to threatened and endangered species such as the California red legged frogs, steelhead trout, and the San Francisco garter snake which requires special working conditions. Hanford endeavors to cultivate a team with a strong knowledge base of federal, state, and local environmental permits and endangered species protection measures.

Proposal
This proposal was prepared using the SOW document provided by the City of Belmont and details provided in a meeting with Sindhi Mekala and Sean Rose on behalf of the City.

Purpose
This proposal is to perform maintenance activities during and following the plant establishment period of a planting area surrounding the Phase 1 Creek Restoration at Twin Pines Park in Belmont, CA. Maintenance will secure the survivability of the native planting, ensuring stability of the streambank, riparian habitat and natural resources enhancement, stormwater and sediment capture, and water quality improvement in the creek restoration area.

Scope of work
Hanford will make regular visits to the site between April and November each year of the project duration. The crew will facilitate plant establishment through invasive plant control, irrigation system observation and maintenance, trash and debris removal, and dead plant replacement.

Exhibit B
Exhibit A
32 Twin Pines Park Belmont Creek Restoration Maintenance – December 2025

Page 3 ends

Pricing
Item Description Quantity Unit Unit price Ext. Price
1 Year 1 Maintenance 1 LS 67,800.00 67,800.00
Total
(Cost breakdown into monthly charges on Page 5 - All pricing includes travel time) Pricing for Years 2-5 shall be provided in accordance with Section 4(B) of the Agreement.

Years 1-3 Plant Establishment Period
Through Hanford’s extensive experience in maintaining existing planting areas, we believe that it is essential to invest in maintenance early in the project to ensure long-term survival. Plants that receive adequate care in the first year of establishment will reduce the number of replacement plants in future years. There will be a greater flush of invasive plants in the first years following streambank reconstruction. Consequentially, there will be an additional effort for invasive plant control and weed management in planting basins. The crew will make two 8-hour visits each month in April through July and one 8-hour visit each month from August through November in Year 1 and Year 2 for maintenance activities. Subsequent years will require less maintenance effort. Year 3 will be reduced to one 8-hour visit every month from April-November. Pricing for Years 2-3 shall be provided in accordance with Section 4(B) of the Agreement.

Year 4-5 Maintenance Period
Hanford will continue to make regular visits to the Phase 1 restoration area for two years following the plant establishment period to ensure survivability and monitor success of the revegetation. By Years 4 and 5, the irrigation system will be removed, and maintenance activities will be reduced to invasive plant management and trash and debris removal. Continued monitoring of geomorphic stability is necessary, adaptive vegetation management measures may be taken depending on site conditions.

Maintenance activities will include hand weeding, string trimming, and spot herbicide application. One 8-hour visit will be made every 3-4 months between April and November in both years. Pricing for Years 4-5 shall be provided in accordance with Section 4(B) of the Agreement.

As-needed Maintenance
The work area will require reactive maintenance based on changing site conditions. Damage may occur to the irrigation system, erosion control, plants, or seeding areas due to natural or anthropogenic causes. Repairs will be made as needed. Materials needed for on-call work will be cost of materials plus 20 percent markup. Additional administrative costs for ordering materials may apply. Materials will be selected and ordered when the need arises.

Exhibit B
Exhibit A
33 Twin Pines Park Belmont Creek Restoration Maintenance – December 2025

Page 4 ends

Pricing
Laborers
April 2026 –
June 2026
July 2026 –
June 2027
July 2027 –
June 2028
July 2028 –
June 2029
July 2029 –
June 2030
July 2030 –
June 2031
2 3,400.00 3,570.00 TBD TBD TBD TBD
3 4,400.00 4,600.00 TBD TBD TBD TBD
4 5,400.00 5,700.00 TBD TBD TBD TBD
Pricing for Years 2-5 shall be provided in accordance with Section 4(B) of the Agreement.

On-call Irrigation System Repair
The irrigation system in the restoration area is designed to operate automatically. If the observing engineer sees a major break in the system that could jeopardize survivability, a crew will be sent out to repair the system before the next irrigation event.

Dead Plant Replacement or Additional Plantings
Dead woody plantings or cuttings may need to be replaced should plant survival fall below 70 percent. If vegetation cover criteria are not met, additional container plants or live pole cuttings may be required. Materials needed for a plant replacement event include correctly sized replacement container plants, fertilizer packets, irrigation supplies, and mulch to re-establish the planting area. Dead Plant Replacement could be a part of regular monthly maintenance if it is planned ahead by the Client. You are able to furnish plants and planting materials for the crew ahead of replacement planting, which may reduce overall cost because there is a markup for Hanford procurement and delivery.

Replacement Seeding
If native herbaceous vegetation cover criteria are not met, additional seeding may be required. The crew will hand-broadcast seed in the areas that failing the vegetation cover requirements.

Mulching
If deemed necessary, the crew may need to spread additional mulch to plant basins or seeded areas. The crew will perform mulching in addition to the regular maintenance tasks.

Erosion Control
In the event of erosional events, adaptive erosion control or repair to the existing erosion fabric or jute roll may be necessary.

Animal Exclusion Cages
If container shrubs or trees experience damage due to browsing or burrowing animals, existing and replacement plants may need to be caged as a preventative maintenance strategy. The crew will construct cages as-needed during plant replacement activities.

Exhibit B
Exhibit A
34 Twin Pines Maintenance — Monthly Charges
April May June July August September October November
2026 $ 11,300.00 $ 11,300.00 $ 11,300.00 $ 11,300.00 $ 5,650.00 $ 5,650.00 $ 5,650.00 $ 5,650.00 Pricing for Years 2-5 shall be provided in accordance with Section 4(B) of the Agreement.

Differing Site Conditions
(A) Modifications. All City modifications to the work or project schedule, whether an addition, deletion, or revision, shall be made by written change order. Whenever the Consultant work is so changed and an equitable adjustment in the Agreement price and/or the Agreement time is appropriate, Consultant shall submit to City within a reasonable time a detailed estimate with supporting calculations and pricing together with any adjustments to the Agreement price and/or the Agreement time. Pricing of the adjustment shall be in accordance with the pricing structure of this Agreement. (B) In the event Consultant discovers (a) subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing materially from those indicated in the Agreement documents or (b) previously unknown physical or other conditions at the site of an unusual nature, differing materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in this Contract, Consultant shall promptly, before such conditions are further disturbed, stop work and notify City in writing thereof. The discovery of Hazardous Material at the site shall be deemed to be a differing site condition pursuant to this article, provided it was not specifically identified, including its location, type, and quantity, in the City-provided documents or brought onto the site by Consultant or its lower-tier contracts for performance of the Work. City shall promptly investigate the conditions and, if it finds that such conditions do so materially differ and Exhibit B
Exhibit A
35 cause an increase or decrease in the cost of, or the time required for, performance of this Agreement or any Work Authorization(s), City shall make an equitable adjustment in the Agreement price and/or the Agreement time. (C) Consultant shall be responsible for all delays that it or its subcontractors and suppliers cause. However, the Agreement time shall be extended as a result of any act or omission of City or its other contractors cause, including resulting from City’s suspension of all or some of the work, or any other cause which is beyond the control of Consultant, its subcontractors, or suppliers, or which Consultant could not have been reasonably foreseen, including, without limitation, acts of any governmental authority, acts of a public enemy, fire, flood, unusual delay in transportation, abnormal weather conditions, labor disputes, strikes, lack of worksite access, acts of God, natural disasters, pandemics, or acts of third parties.

Insurance
Pricing is based on the insurance standards provided. If the City changes or modifies any of the insurance requirements, the City will reimburse the Consultant for all additional costs resulting from such changes or modifications.

Page 5 ends

Exhibit A
36

Page 6 ends

ARROYO DE LA LAGUNA MITIGATION
Alameda County, CA
Client: Sequoia Ecological Consulting, Inc.
1342 Creekside Drive Walnut
Creek, CA 94596
Contact: Ari Rogers, Senior Biologist | Project Manager (512) 940-4049
[email protected]
Total Contract Amount: $488,220
Contract Period: 2023-2029
Hanford performs implementation of the Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan within 6.81 acres of designated
Mitigation Area along the Arroyo de la Laguna. This is done via several steps: invasive species management across the entirety of the site, with the objective being to reduce non-native plant populations both before and after planting efforts, installation of roughly 4,200 plants, willow poles, compost, wood chip mulch, browse protection caging throughout the riparian mitigation site, and lastly installation of an on-site irrigation system, consisting of PVC pipe, lateral poly drip tube lines, valves, and on-site holding tanks.

Hanford performs ongoing annual maintenance for six years after implementation.

Maintenance includes supplemental watering through plant establishment during the dry season, twice annual mowing, direct removal of invasives, and replanting depending upon monitoring results.

Exhibit B
Exhibit A
37

Page 7 ends

MAINTENANCE & MONITORING OF THE LAS GALLINAS

CREEK WATERSHED RIPARIAN ENHANCEMENT PLANTING
Main County, CA
Client: Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District
5401 Old Redwood Highway, Ste. 200
Petaluma, CA 94954
Contact: Negin Sagaee
(707) 285-8183
[email protected]
Total Contract Amount: $80,774
Contract Period: 2022-2027
Hanford maintains the riparian enhancement site for years 5 through year 9 of the required monitoring period. Hanford works with a subcontractor for monitoring requirements. The purpose of the Project is to provide mitigation for riparian habitat impacts resulting from a Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART) project through enhancement of riparian habitat. The mitigation project consists of at least 0.12 acre and 565 linear feet of riparian habitat, as prescribed in the October 2017 Las Gallinas Creek Watershed Riparian Enhancement Plan.

The scope of work generally consists of confirming planting success, maintaining and enhancing the mitigation plantings, removing invasive species, irrigation if needed due to drought conditions, and monitoring to provide the required annual report for agency submittal.

Exhibit B
Exhibit A
38

Page 8 ends

NAPA RIVER OAKVILLE TO OAK KNOLL GROUP C RESTORATION & REVEGETATION Napa County, CA
Client: Napa County Flood Control & Water
Conservation District 804 1st Street,
Napa, CA 94559
Contact: Michael Gordon, Specialist
(707) 501-8201
[email protected]
Total Contract Amount: $1,244,366
Contract Period: 2018-2021
Hanford planted approximately 87,000 container plants and hundreds of harvested willows at restoration sites along the Napa River. Crews installed an in-house-designed irrigation system.

Crews constructed and managed a shaded on-site nursery with associated infrastructure for 3 months during plant delivery and installation.

Three years of maintenance and monitoring followed the planting: routine visits the site to control non-native invasive plants, perform monitoring/survivorship assessments, maintain planting basins, and perform troubleshooting on the irrigation system. Initial construction and plant installation were completed in early 2019. All restoration goals for success and native cover were met or exceeded. Hanford completed this contract in 2021.

Exhibit B
Exhibit A
39

Page 9 ends

SAN RAFAEL CREEK RIPARIAN ENHANCEMENT
Marin County, CA
Client: Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District
5401 Old Redwood Highway, Ste. 200
Petaluma, CA 94954
Contact: Negin Sagaee
(707) 285-8183
[email protected]
Total Contract Amount: $266,600
Contract Period: 2021-2026
The San Rafael Creek Riparian Enhancement project enhances approximately 5,345 square feet (0.12 acres) of riparian habitat. Specifically, the footprint consists of three separate enhancement sites located on the San Rafael Creek. Hanford was responsible for planting, caging of plants, soil remediations, and installation of an irrigation system at the sites in late 2021 and is responsible for maintaining the sites until late 2026. Maintenance events include removal of weeds, garbage, and other debris that impede plant growth, watering and irrigation system repairs, cage adjustments, and replacement planting as needed. Hanford works with a subcontractor for monitoring requirements.

Exhibit B
Exhibit A
40 755 Baywood Drive, Suite 380
Petaluma, CA 94954
CA Lic. #461167
(707) 996-6633
[email protected]

Page 10 ends

ARI WILSON
SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER – LAND MANAGEMENT
Summary
Ari has over fifteen years of experience in plant ecology, botany, and land management. She has worked in a wide array of fields: habitat restoration, conservation science, revegetation, invasive species management, arboriculture, horticulture, biological research and education, plant identification, environmental education, and laboratory coordination. Ari has worked at Hanford for over seven years, and has worked at every level of the organization, from laborer to management.

As a Senior Project Manager at Hanford, Ari manages projects from proposal to close-out. Additionally, she supports, supervises, and advises other Land Management team members on operations, billing, and project implementation. Active project scopes include weed management, riparian restoration, mitigation, fuel reduction, erosion control, and long-term site maintenance and monitoring.

Ari is also the primary botanist within Hanford’s Land Management division. She implements botanically enriching education for field staff to better hone their skills at plant identification at multiple phenological stages and be competent in field identification.

Education & Certifications
• Master of Science - Ecology, Evolution & Conservation Biology | San Francisco State University | 2019 o Thesis Title: Turning over a new leaf: A centennial analysis of physiological changes in Arctostaphylos (Ericaceae) & Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae)
• Bachelor of Science - Botany | San Francisco State University | 2014 • International Certified Arborist | 2019 - present
• California Certified Naturalist | 2010 - present
Relevant Project Experience
Project Description Client
Fuel Reduction and
Restoration | 2020-
2024
Mechanical and hand removal of non-native weeds,
woody species from grasslands, defensible space,
and fuel-break maintenance.

Marin Municipal Water
District |Corte Madera, CA
Willits Mitigation
Lands Maintenance
and Enhancement |
2023-2028
Shrub and tree planting, herbaceous plant site preparation and installation, mowing, target weed removal, other weed removal, watering, and seed collection on the Willits Bypass Mitigation Lands.

Mendocino County
Resource Conservation
District | Ukiah, CA
Oakville Revegetation
Group C | 2018-2021
Install native plants and perform invasive plant
management to revegetate area along Napa river.

Napa Co. Flood Control &
Water Conservation
District | Napa, CA
Exhibit B
Exhibit A
41 775 Baywood Drive, Suite 207
Petaluma, CA 94954
CA Lic. #461167
(707) 996-6633
[email protected]

Page 11 ends

PATRICK DOWNS
SUPERINTENDENT – LAND MANAGEMENT
Summary
Patrick has more than 15 years of experience in habitat restoration, conservation-related work, and land management; 10 of these years have been with Hanford. Prior to joining Hanford, Patrick worked for the Conservation Corps North Bay where he supervised crews in native planting and invasive species removal, habitat restoration, litter abatement, irrigation installation, fire fuel reduction, creek habitat maintenance and restoration, and trail building. He also worked for the Sonoma County Water Agency as a Natural Resource Crew Supervisor.

As Superintendent at Hanford, Patrick supervises logistics for dozens of revegetation and restoration projects, overseeing 15-20 field personnel and an autonomous operations yard in Petaluma. Patrick’s responsibilities include plan and specification compliance, project field implementation, technical analysis and project documentation, personnel and resource management, job cost and productivity reporting, and inventory/maintenance of equipment.

Education & Certifications
• Naturalist Certification, Pepperwood Preserve Stewardship Program | Santa Rosa, CA | 2014 • Bachelor of Arts, Environmental Studies | UC Santa Cruz | 2014 • Qualified Applicator Certification | 2015 – 2024
• Qualified Applicator License | 2024 – present
Relevant Project Experience
Project Description Client
Denman Reach |
2017 - present
Invasive plant management, irrigation maintenance,
mowing, mulch replenishment, re-planting/re-seeding.

City of Petaluma |
Petaluma, CA
Blankstein Wetland
Mitigation | 2015 -
Present
New cage installation, existing cage relocation,
planting basin maintenance, vegetation control,
irrigation maintenance.

H.T. Harvey &Associates |
Alameda County,
Las Gallinas Creek
Enhancement | 2018 -
present
Planting, browse cages, seeding, irrigation installation, weeding/clearing, biological monitoring and maintenance. native plantings to convert vineyard to riparian habitat.

SMART | Marin County, CA
Exhibit B
Exhibit A
42 Twin Pines Park Belmont Creek Restoration Maintenance – November 2025

Page 12 ends

Exhibit A
General Conditions

1. This proposal is valid for 30 days from the date submitted.

2. This proposal is contingent upon reaching mutually agreeable contract terms, with the understanding that all proposal terms and these General Conditions shall be incorporated into any resulting contract between the parties.

3. Any resulting contract will create an independent contractor relationship between the parties; no fiduciary duty or agency will be created.

4. In the event of any conflicts among the contract documents, Contractor’s Scope of Work and any conditions or exclusions therefrom shall control.

5. Owner will obtain all permissions, permits, licenses, and inspections required for Contractor to perform the Work and shall pay all costs associated therewith, excluding only those licenses required to be held by Contractor to generally perform this type of work.

6. Owner will provide all plans, specifications, and other designs services required for the Work – no design services are included in Contractor’s Scope of Work unless explicitly provided in the proposal.

7. Owner will provide unlimited and unrestricted access to the site area(s) necessary for the Work.

8. Owner will locate and mark or move, as necessary, any permanent or temporary utility, whether active or abandoned, that may be affected by the Work.

9. If vessel access is a component of the Work, the waterway shall be of sufficient depth for the vessel’s required draft at the time(s) Contractor requires access.

10. Contractor will not perform any containment, cleanup, or disposal of hazardous materials that (a) were pre-existing at the Site or (b) if brought to the Site for the Project, were not released by Contractor. If Contractor encounters any hazardous materials at the site that have not been rendered harmless, Contractor shall immediately stop work in the affected area and report the condition to Owner. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Owner shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Contractor, its affiliates, officers, employees, directors, and agents from all claims, damages, losses, and expenses, included but not limited to attorneys’ fees, arising out of or resulting from any pre-existing hazardous materials.

11. If Owner is providing any materials or equipment for Contractor’s Work, they shall be provided at no cost to Contractor and shall meet the requirements of the Work, including applicable plans and specifications, without the need for any alteration or adjustment, and Contractor shall not be responsible for any defects therein, warranty thereto, or damage or loss thereto, except to the extent caused by Contractor or its lower tier contractors.

12. Contractor shall be entitled to rely on the accuracy, adequacy, and completeness of the information provided to it or authored by Owner or Owner’s other contractors, including without limitation the plans and specifications, their compliance with applicable laws, codes, and standards, and any site data, including subsurface data, regardless of any disclaimer and regardless of when the information was provided to Contractor. Such information shall be incorporated into any resulting contract. Contractor shall not be required to independently verify the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of such information, though Contractor shall promptly notify Owner of any deficiencies or discrepancies that it discovers therein. If any deficiency or discrepancy impacts the Work, it shall be addressed via change order.

13. Contractor shall perform the Work in one continuous, uninterrupted operation, 8 hours per day, 5 days a week, unless otherwise specifically provided in the proposal.

Exhibit B
Exhibit A
43 Twin Pines Park Belmont Creek Restoration Maintenance – November 2025

Page 13 ends

14. Contractor shall commence and proceed with the Work according to a mutually agreeable schedule, which shall be incorporated into any resulting contract and which Owner may modify via change order. This change order shall encompass all related price and time impacts to Contractor.

15. If Contractor is unable to maintain a continuous operation due to circumstances beyond its control, including as a result of Owner’s or Owner’s other contractors’ delays or Owner’s suspension of the Work, Owner shall pay Contractor its standby rate unless otherwise specifically provided in the proposal.

16. If any delay/suspension not caused by Contractor exceeds ten consecutive working days, or twenty cumulative working days during the project, Contractor may, at its option, demobilize, to return at a future mutually agreeable date, at the cost of Owner.

17. Contractor will provide payment and performance bonds upon request at an additional cost.

Contractor will not provide a letter of credit, nor will Contractor’s owners or officers provide a personal guarantee.

18. Owner shall pay Contractor at least monthly for approved invoices, which shall include stored materials, within 30 days of submission, assuming Contractor has provided all reasonably requested prerequisites.

19. Owner shall not withhold any retention from its payments to Contractor.

20. Owner shall pay Contractor 100% of its price for mobilization upon completion thereof.

21. Late payments by either party shall bear interest at the same rate, which shall be 18% per annum, unless otherwise agreed.

22. If Owner has the right to deduct or offset any payment, Contractor shall have an equal right to do so.

23. Contractor may suspend Work if Owner fails to pay undisputed amounts when due and fails to cure the nonpayment within five business days from written notice thereof.

24. Statutory lien/bond claim waivers shall be used wherever required or available. If the Work is being performed in a state that does not have statutory lien/bond claim waivers required or available, the lien/bond claim waivers shall mirror California’s statutory waivers.

25. Contractor’s lien rights shall not be subordinated to any other claimant of Owner.

26. Contractor has performed a reasonable investigation of the site satisfying itself as to (1) the known and readily observable nature, location, and character of the site and the project, specifically including the surface conditions of the site and the surrounding area, and all structures and obstructions thereon, both natural and man-made, and any subsurface conditions disclosed in writing by Owner; (2) the nature, location, and character of the general area in which the project is located, including generally prevailing climatic conditions, labor supply, labor cost, equipment supply, and equipment cost; (3) the quality and quantity of all materials, supplies, tools, equipment, labor, and services necessary to complete the Work at the quoted price and according to the mutually agreed schedule; and (4) any requirements imposed by applicable laws and applicable permits, and Contractor shall not be entitled to any increase in the price or extension to the schedule for its failure to perform such a reasonable site investigation. Contractor’s obligation to perform a reasonable site investigation shall not extend beyond the foregoing and Contractor specifically repudiates any obligation to assume the risk of (a) subsurface conditions not disclosed in writing by Owner, (b) differing site conditions, (c) abnormal weather conditions, or (d) delays not caused by Contractor, and Contractor shall be entitled to make a claim for an increase to the price and/or extension to the schedule caused thereby.

27. Contractor warrants that the Work shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner, according to the plans and specifications, free from defects in design, material, and workmanship, and using new materials unless otherwise specified. Contractor specifically disclaims all other Exhibit B
Exhibit A
44 Twin Pines Park Belmont Creek Restoration Maintenance – November 2025

Page 14 ends

warranties implied by law, including the warranty of fitness for a particular purpose and warranty of merchantability, as well as any requirement to perform the Work according to Owner’s intent.

28. The duration of Contractor’s warranty shall not (a) for construction Work, exceed one year from the substantial completion date of its Work or (b) for dredging Work, exceed the date the area is surveyed for payment.

29. Contractor shall not bear the risk of loss for any loss or damage to the Work (a) caused by Owner, Owner’s other contractors, any force majeure events, (b) covered by Owner’s builder’s risk policy, or, if not caused or covered by any of the foregoing, (c)(i) for construction Work, beyond the date of substantial completion or Owner’s beneficial use (in whole or in part) of the Work, whichever occurs earlier, or (ii) for dredging Work, beyond the date the area is surveyed for payment.

30. The amount of liquidated damages to be assess for Contractor delays shall be negotiated and shall only apply to the extent Contractor and/or its lower tier contractors are responsible for causing the delay.

31. Contractor’s liability and indemnity obligations for any property damage, physical injury, breach of contract, or other claim, loss, damage, or expense shall be proportional, to the extent of its or its lower tier contractors’ acts or omissions. Contractor shall not be liable for Owner’s or any other party’s acts or omissions, whether active or passive, or be required to indemnity Owner or any other party for such. Owner shall have the same liability and indemnity obligations to Contractor.

32. Contractor’s provision of insurance, including its primary response, additional insured endorsements, and waivers of subrogation, shall be limited to the extent of Contractor’s proportional liability and indemnity obligations.

33. Contractor shall not be required to waive any rights available to it under the law unless equally applicable to and waived by Owner.

34. Except provisions for liquidated damages or damages that are a part of third-party claims that either Party has an obligation to indemnify the other Party from, neither party shall be liable to the other for indirect damages of any kind, including incidental, special, and consequential damages and encompassing, without limitation, loss of use, loss of profit, and loss of business opportunity.

35. Contractor may request a change order or pursue a claim against Owner for an increase to the price and/or extension to the schedule when Owner’s or Owner’s other contractors’ acts or omissions, including delays, adversely affect Contractor’s performance of the Work or otherwise cause damage, loss, or expense to Contractor.

36. Change orders, and any claimed accord and satisfaction associated therewith, shall encompass only the scope of the change order, not the entirety of the project performed up to the date of the change order.

37. Change order / claim notice deadlines shall not be less than ten business days from the date Contractor knew of the circumstance giving rise thereto.

38. A change order shall utilize the unit prices provided in the contract, if applicable. If no such unit price is applicable, the parties will negotiate to reach a mutually agreeable price for the work. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement, Contractor shall perform the work on a time and materials basis, plus a fee of twenty-four percent for all overhead and profit associated therewith.

39. Force majeure shall include labor, material, equipment, and lower tier contractor shortages due to any pandemic or epidemic, including COVID-19, and all abnormal climate conditions, which shall be defined as all precipitation days for the period of time in excess of the ten year average reported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reporting station located closest to the Site.

Contractor shall not be responsible for any delay damages and shall be entitled to make a claim for an increase to the price and/or an extension to the schedule if delayed as a result thereof.

Exhibit B
Exhibit A
45 Twin Pines Park Belmont Creek Restoration Maintenance – November 2025

Page 15 ends

40. Contractor shall be given the opportunity to cure any breach of contract or defect in the Work, which it shall commence and diligently continue within a minimum of ten business days from written notice thereof.

41. In the event of termination for default, Owner may take possession of Contractor’s materials as well as equipment and tools specifically leased for the project. All equipment and tools owned or leased for non-project-related reasons by Contractor shall remain in the sole possession of Contractor.

42. In the event of termination for convenience, Contractor shall be paid (a) for mobilization, the Work completed to date, and demobilization, each at the rates provided, (b) reasonable costs of termination, and (c) twenty-four percent of those termination costs for overhead and profit.

Exhibit B
Exhibit A
46

Page 1 of 2 ends

Belmont Village Bike and Pedestrian Project Construction (HAWK Crossing@Hill St) Shared Cost Agreement - Staff Report (2).docx

STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: January 27, 2026
Agency: City of Belmont
Staff Contact: Brian Nguyen, Public Works, (650) 637-2998, [email protected] Agenda Title: Belmont Village Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements Project Shared Cost Agreement with Linc Housing Development
Agenda Action: Resolution
Recommendation
Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute a Shared Cost Agreement with Linc Housing Development Project (Linc Project) for reimbursement of construction costs associated with overlapping improvements between the City of Belmont’s Belmont Village Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements Project and the Linc Project’s frontage improvements, in the amount of $187,004.15 plus a 10% contingency.

Strategic Focus Area
Infrastructure and Mobility
Background
The High-Intensity Activated Crosswalk (HAWK Project) was identified in the City’s 2016 Comprehensive Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan. The project includes installation of a HAWK at the El Camino Real and Hill Street intersection to improve pedestrian and bicycle connectivity and accessibility between surrounding residential neighborhoods, nearby housing developments, and Belmont's Caltrain station.

In April 2023, the HAWK Project was initiated by the City as an independent project. At that time, no construction schedule had been established for the
adjacent Linc Project. In late fall 2024, however, the
Linc Project secured funding and subsequently
obtained building permits in April 2025.

The Linc Project is scheduled to begin their frontage
improvements in June 2026. During coordination
meetings between City staff and Linc Housing in
April 2025, the Linc Project requested that City
delay the HAWK Project and allow the Linc Project
to construct the overlapping portion of work along
their frontage, as shown in the figure to minimize
construction conflicts and associated rework of
public improvements.
47

Page 2 of 2 ends

Belmont Village Bike and Pedestrian Project Construction (HAWK Crossing@Hill St) Shared Cost Agreement - Staff Report (2).docx Analysis
Given the close proximity of the two projects and the overlap in required improvements, City staff has determined that allowing The Linc Project to perform the overlapping construction work is both prudent and cost-effective. This coordinated approach will support more efficient project delivery and optimize the use of public resources by:
 Preventing conflicts between public improvements
 Reducing constructability challenges
 Avoiding duplication of work and costly rework
Exhibit 1 provides a copy of LINC’s bid results for $187,004.15 for the planned work, which came in below the City’s original estimate of $289,550. Based on these estimates, allowing the LINC Project to construct the overlapping improvements would result in an estimated cost savings of $102,545.85 for the City, while ensuring coordinated delivery of adjacent public and private improvements. .

Alternatives

1. Refer back to staff for more information

2. Take No Action
Attachments
A. Resolution
B. Exhibit 1 – Linc Project Bid
Fiscal Impact
☐ No Fiscal Impact
☒ Funding Source Confirmed:
$187,004.15 plus a 10% contingency is budgeted under Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Hill Street HAWK Signal Project# 3232 (Account 399-3-730-3232-9030), funded by the Measure A Street Improvement Fund and contribution from County of San Mateo.

Source: Purpose: Public Outreach:

Council Statutory/Contractual Requirement Posting of Agenda 48

Page 1 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026 –

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELMONT

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A

SHARED COST AGREEMENT WITH LINC HOUSING CORPORATION IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $187,004.15 PLUS A 10% CONTINGENCY.

WHEREAS, the City of Belmont is implementing the Belmont Village Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements Project (HAWK Project), which was identified in the City’s 2016 Comprehensive Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan and initiated as an independent project in April 2023; and
WHEREAS, the adjacent Linc Housing Development Project (Linc Project) obtained building permits in April 2025 and is scheduled to begin frontage improvements in June 2026; and
WHEREAS, during coordination meetings between City staff and Linc Housing Corporation in April 2025, Linc Housing requested that the City delay construction of the HAWK Project and allow Linc Housing to construct the overlapping portion of improvements along its project frontage; and
WHEREAS, due to the close proximity of the two project sites, City staff determined that allowing The Linc Housing Corporation to perform the overlapping construction work is both prudent and cost-effective, and will prevent conflicts in public improvements, minimize constructability challenges, and avoid duplication of work and costly rework; and WHEREAS, cost estimates prepared by the City and by Linc Housing demonstrates that the overlapping improvements can be constructed at a lower cost if performed by Linc Housing Corporation.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Belmont resolves as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Manager is authorized to negotiate and execute a Shared Cost Agreement with the Linc Housing Corporation in an amount not to exceed $187,004.15 plus a 10% contingency.
* * *
49

Page 2 of 2 ends

ADOPTED January 27, 2026 by the City of Belmont City Council by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

ATTEST:

City Clerk Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney
50 R.S.
1 7250Redwood Boulevard,
Novato, CA 94945
+1 415-332-8390
[email protected]

HILL STREET APARTMENTS
Civil Drawings by: BKF
Joint TrenchDrawings by: Millennium Design&Consulting, Inc.

Geotechnical Investigation by: ENGEO
Dated: 01-15-25
Dated: 07-19-23
Dated: 11-26-2024
We propose to furnish all labor, materials,transportation and services as perthe itemized scope of work aslisted below:

A. BASE BID - Itemized Scope of Work: EXTRA SITE CONCRETE WORK AT HILL STREET

1.) OFF-SITE - Place A.C. Pavement Plug at Curb & Gutter- Install Approx. 4'0'' Feet Each - Total of 8'0'' Ln. $ Ft.; Approx. 12 Sq. Ft.
- A.C. 11" Course, in 4 Lifts - Install Approx. 1 Tons
1,246.88

2.) OFF SITE - Place and Compact Recycle Aggregate Base & Concrete Paving at Sidewalk - Concrete Sidewalks - 4" Base Rock Course x 276 Sq. Ft.; Approx. 7 Tons. - Concrete Sidewalks- 4" thick p.c.c.; Approx. 276 Sq. Ft.; Install Approx. 4 Cu. Yds. $ 10,337.25
- A2-6 Curb & Gutter - 6" Base Rock Course x 8 Ln Ft.; Approx. 1 Tons. - A2-6 Concrete Curb & Gutter - 30" wide; Approx. 8 Ln. Ft. - Install Yellow Detectable Warning - Approx. 0 Sq. Ft. ALTERNATE

3.) OFF-SITE - Joint Trench - Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon ( Ref. Dwg. : E-1, E-2, & ED-1 ) A. Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon
- Saw Cut A.C. Paving at Utilities - Approx. 4" thick; Approx. 200 Ln. Ft. - Demo & Remove A.C. Paving at Utilities- Approx. 4" thick; Approx. 2505 Sq. Ft. $ 49,952.35
- Supply & Install Approx. 258 Ln. Ft. of 2" Street Lights (SCH-40) - Asphalt Patch at Utility Trenches, 4" Section - Approx. 178 Sq. Ft.; Approx. 6 Tons - Trench Plates for Trench Protection Qty of 89 Each
- Pothole Existing; Qty of 7 Each -BUDGET
- Install (1) Connection to Existing Enclosure/MH/Tel/Cable Box Located at: 900 El Camino Real, Belmont, CA 94002
51 R.S.
2 $ 170,946.70
B. OFF-SITE - PierDrilling & Installations of Hybrid Beacon $ - Drill a Install (2) Type 2 Post ( Pier Holes) - 1'6" Dia. x 1' 6" Deep - Approx. 3'0'' V.L.F. Deep; Approx. 1 Cu. Yds. Spoils Off-Haul
- Form & Pour Qty of (2) Type 2 Post - Approx. 1/2 Cu. Yds P.C.C. w/ RebarCage 79,880.96
- Drill a Install (2) Type 1-B ( Pier Holes) - 2'6'' Dia. x 6'0'' Deep - Approx. 6'0'' V.L.F. Deep; Approx. 3 Cu.

Yds. Spoils Off-Haul
- Form & Pour Qty of (2) Type 1-B - Approx. 2 Cu. Yds P.C.C. w/ Rebar Cage - Drill a Install (1) Type 19-4-100 Pole ( Pier Holes) - 3'6'' Dia. x 1'0'' Deep - Approx. 1'0'' V.L.F. Deep; Approx. 1 Cu. Yds. SpoilsOff-Haul
- Form & Pour Qty of (1) Type 19-4-100 - Approx. 1/2 Cu. Yds P.C.C. w/ Rebar Cage - Drill a Install (1) Type 26-4-100 Pole ( Pier Holes) - 3'6'' Dia. x 1'0'' Deep - Approx. 1'0'' V.L.F. Deep; Approx. 1 Cu. Yds. SpoilsOff-Haul
- Form & Pour Qty of (1) Type 26-4-100 - Approx. 1/2 Cu. Yds P.C.C. w/ Rebar Cage - Install Approx. 275 Ln. Ft. of 2 - #14 & #10 AWG Wire - Qty of (4) - #5 - Splice Boxes
- Qty of (1) - #6 - Splice Boxes
- Qty of (2) - Mast Arm Pole
- Qty of (2) - Mast -3A Pedistrian Hybrid beacon signal head

ALTERNATE

ALTERNATE
- Install ( 2 ) R10-23A - Name Sign ALTERNATE
- Install ( 2 )W11-15 - Sign 48''
C. OFF-SITE - Pier Drilling & Installations of Type III Service Cabinet $ - Drill a Install (1) Type III - AF Pier Holes - 1'6'' x 1'6'' x 2'0'' Deep - Approx. 2'0'' V.L.F. Deep; Approx. 1 Cu. Yds. Spoils Off-Haul
- Form & Pour Qty of (1) Type III - AF - Approx. 1/2 Cu. Yds P.C.C. w/ Rebar Cage

ALTERNATE
3,556.88
- Install ( 1 )Type III - AF ServiceCabinet
D. OFF-SITE - PierDrilling & Installations of Controller Cabinet with Battery Back up System $ - Drill Cut & Off Haul - 9'9'' x 4'2'' x 4'' Thick- Approx. 1 Cu. Yds. Spoils Off-Haul - Form & Pour Qty of (1) Concrete Pad. Approx. 1/2 Cu. Yds P.C.C.

ALTERNATE
3,675.00
- Install ( 1 ) Model 332 LS Cabinet
- Install ( 1 ) Model LX-BBS Cabinet
- Install ( 1 ) Model 2070 Controller Assembly, Battery Backup system

ALTERNATE

4.) OFF-SITE Joint Trench by RVS for Permit ; 1 LS $ -
SUBTOTAL $
PGCC FEE @ 15%: $
TOTAL
148,649.30
22,297.40
52 Attn: Tony Evans
7250 Redwood Boulevard,
Novato, CA 94945
+1 415-332-8390
[email protected]

HILL STREET APARTMENTS
Located at: 900 El Camino Real, Belmont, CA 94002
Civil Drawings by: BKF Dated: 01-15-25
Joint Trench Drawings by: Millennium Design & Consulting, Inc. Dated: 07-19-23 Geotechnical Investigation by: ENGEO Dated: 11-26-2024
We propose to furnish all labor, materials, transportation and services as per the itemized scope of work as listed below:

A. BASE BID - Itemized Scope of Work: TRAILBLAZER RELOCATION

13.) OFF-SITE - Joint Trench - Trailblazer New Location $ 8,918.00 - Trench & Backfill P2 - 18" W x 49" D - Approx. Approx. 10 Ln. Ft. at Dirt - Supply & Install Approx. 113 Ln. Ft. of Approx. 2" Conduit (SCH-40) - Labor Wiring Installations - 1 LS
- Misc Materials per applicant material list - ground rods, fittings, fault indicator, barrier post, bolts, screws, nuts, washers, bushings, connectors, fuses, cable & wire, etc. -
-
1 OFF-SITE - Pier Drilling & Installations of Trailblazer new location $ 5,045.00 Drill a Install (1) Type 1-B ( Pier Holes ) - 2'6'' Dia. x 6'0'' Deep - Approx. 6'0'' V.L.F. Deep; Approx. 1 Cu.

Yds. Spoils Off-Haul
Form & Pour Qty of (1) Type 1-B - Approx. 1 Cu. Yds P.C.C. w/ Rebar Cage NOTE: Assuming reuse existing equipment, pole, and pull box.

SUBTOTAL $ 13,963.00
PROFIT & OVERHEAD @ 15%: $ 2094.45
TOTAL $ 16,057.45
53

Page 1 of 2 ends

Council Intergovernmental Assignments for Calendar Year 2026 Update - Staff Report - IGR Assignments Jan 2026

STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: January 27, 2026
Agency: City of Belmont
Staff Contact: Jozi Plut, City Clerk, [email protected], 650-595-7414 Agenda Title: Follow-Up: City Council Vice Mayor Appointment and Calendar Year 2026 Intergovernmental Assignments
Agenda Action: Motion
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council receive this report confirming the 2026 Vice Mayor appointment and Intergovernmental Assignments as discussed and approved at the December 9, 2025 meeting and review the current list of assignments to determine whether any changes are needed.

Strategic Focus Area
Fiscal and Organizational Sustainability
Background
At the December 9, 2025 Council meeting, the City Council appointed Councilmember Cathy Jordan as Vice Mayor for Calendar Year 2026 in accordance with the Council Protocols. At the same meeting, the Council reviewed and approved the 2026 Intergovernmental Assignments (IGR), including Council representation on external agencies, regional committees, boards, and City subcommittees.

Additionally, the Council established the Ad Hoc Housing & Long-Range Planning Subcommittee to provide a forum for ongoing review of state housing legislation and its impacts on Belmont’s local policies and long-range planning efforts. This subcommittee consists of Councilmembers Latimerlo and Vice Mayor Jordan.

Analysis
Following Council direction in December, staff has finalized the list of assignments for 2026. All appointments and subcommittee memberships are consistent with the Council’s consensus and individual preferences expressed at the prior meeting. The assignments include:
• Vice Mayor: Cathy Jordan
• Regional Committees / Boards / Agencies: See Attachment A • City Subcommittees / Liaison Roles: See Attachment A
The Council is asked to review the current list of assignments and determine whether any changes are needed. The Council may also consider eliminating subcommittees that are no longer active or adding new subcommittees, as appropriate. This review ensures that assignments reflect current priorities and Councilmember interests while providing clarity on roles and responsibilities for the calendar year. 54

Page 2 of 2 ends

Council Intergovernmental Assignments for Calendar Year 2026 Update - Staff Report Alternatives

1. Defer to a future meeting
Insert Alternatives – include all realistic options including “Take No Action”.

Attachments
A. 2026 IGR Assignment List
Fiscal Impact
☒ No Fiscal Impact
☐ Funding Source Confirmed:

Source: Purpose: Public Outreach:

Staff Council Vision/Priority Posting of Agenda
55 Updated, December 9, 2025 1 | P a g e
Committee Delegate/
Representative
Alternates Schedule Meeting
Location
Contact
2+2 Ad hoc Committee with
Mid-Peninsula Water District
McCune
Jordan
n/a As Needed Public Works Director
2+2+2 BRSSD Committee
Multi agency committee to discuss/share
issues of interest between the Belmont
Redwood Shores School District, Redwood
City, and Belmont"
PangMaganaris
Latimerlo
n/a First Weds:

October
January
May
FY 2025/26:

School District
FY 2026/27:

Redwood City
FY 2027/28:

Belmont
City Manager
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee provides independent
review and oversight of the City's financial
reporting processes, internal controls and
independent auditors and participates in the
budget review process
Vice MayorJordan
Pang -
Maganaris
Latimerlo As Needed Finance Director
Belmont-SC Fire Dept JPA -
Oversight of the legacy Fire Department with
San Carlos
Mates McCune As Needed City Manager/
Finance Director
(C/CAG)
C/CAG operates as a Joint Powers Authority
and has membership that includes each of
Mates PangMaganarisMonthly
2nd
Thursday,
7:00 p.m..
650-599-1406
Public Works Director

Council Committee and Intergovernmental Assignments (IGR) 2026 56 Updated, December 9, 2025 2 | P a g e
the 20 cities and the County in San Mateo
County. It works on issues that affect the
quality of life in general; transportation, air
quality, stormwater runoff, airport/land use
compatibility planning, hazardous waste,
climate planning, energy and water resource
strategies, and solid waste and recycling.

Belmont Community Foundation Ad-Hoc
Committee
Mayor Mates
and
PangMaganaris
Four Corners Ad-hoc Committee
Alameda de Las Pulgas Corridor Improvement
Project is a multi-agency regional
transportation improvement project
involving cities of Belmont, San Carlos, and
two School Districts (Sequoia Union High
School and San Carlos School District) along
the Alameda de Las Pulgas and San Carlos
Ave Corridor.

McCune and
PangMaganaris
n/a As Needed City Manager
Public Works Director
Housing Ad-Hoc Sub-Committee
Provide the Council with developments, receive
staff updates, and discuss emerging issues with
new State housing laws and their direct
implications for Belmont’s local planning and
policy framework
Jordan
Latimerlo
n/a TBD City Manager/ACM
Liaison to Senior Citizen Advisory Committee McCune Latimerlo As Needed Twin Pines Senior &
Community
Center Craft
Room
Parks and Rec
57 Updated, December 9, 2025 3 | P a g e
Liaison to Chamber San Mateo County –
Governmental Relations Committee
Mayor Mates Jordan Every other
Month
Amy Buckmaster/
Mary Parden
Public Safety Committee –
The Public Safety Committee’s duties are to
consider policy matters related to police and
public safety services in Belmont, provide a
forum for presentation and discussion of
specific information related to public safety
policy and practices.

Vice Mayor
Jordan and
Latimerlo
Quarterly/As
Needed
City Manager/
Police Chief
Silicon Valley Clean Water
JPA for Wastewater Treatment
McCune Jordan Monthly,
2nd Monday,
8:00 a.m.

Teresa Herrera, P.E.

Manager
650-832-6220
Youth Advisory Committee -
Belmont Youth (grades 7-12) focused on civic
engagement through planning and hosting
activities and events.

McCune PangMaganarisYAC meetings
2x Month
Thursdays
6:30 pm;
school year
only;
Delegate
attendance
only as
needed
Barrett
Community
Center;
Hideout
Room
Parks and Rec
Joint Powers Authorities/Intergovernmental Agencies
ABAG General Assembly -
Regional planning agency for land use,
housing, environmental quality, and
Mayor Mates Vice
Mayor
Jordan
April,
November
General
Fred Castro
Clerk of the Board
[email protected]
58 Updated, December 9, 2025 4 | P a g e
economic development- Association of Bay
Area Governments, mission is to strengthen
cooperation and collaboration across local
governments to build healthier, stronger
communities.
-ABAG is part regional planning agency and
part local government service provider. We
accomplish our goals by providing planning
services and cost-effective ABAG member
services to local governments struggling
with rising costs and diminishing incomes
Assembly
Meetings
Caltrain Local Policy Maker Group (LPMG)-
LMPG provides policy and stakeholder input
to Caltrain staff on the Caltrain
Modernization Program (CalMod), and
Business Plan.

PangMaganarisJordan Last Thurs of
Month
6-8 pm
Bella Conferti, Government &
Community Affairs Specialist
Cell Phone: 650.647.3498
Email: [email protected]
Grand Boulevard –
The Grand Boulevard is a collaboration of
19 cities, counties, local and regional
agencies united to improve the
performance, safety, and aesthetics of El
Camino Real. The initiative brings together
all the agencies having responsibility for the
condition, use and performance of the
street.

Mates PangMaganaris2-3 times
annually
Community Development
Director, Carlos de Melo
Home For All Initiative -
The mission of Home for All initiative is to
establish a climate in San Mateo County
where a diversity of housing is produced
and preserved so that San Mateo County is
a culturally, generationally, and
Mates Latimerlo As Needed City Manager
59 Updated, December 9, 2025 5 | P a g e
economically diverse community with
housing for all. Home for All SMC is a
collaborative initiative comprised of the
County of San Mateo, local governments,
school districts, community-based
organizations, faith-based organizations,
advocacy groups and businesses.

Housing and Regional Trust (HEART)
Member Agency Committee –
HEART is a 501(c)(3) that was founded in
2003 as a public/private partnership among
the cities in San Mateo County, the County,
and the business, nonprofit, education, and
labor communities to create more
affordable housing in San Mateo County.

HEART’s mission is to create and preserve
affordable housing for low- and moderateincome families by raising and investing money from public and private sources.

Latimerlo PangMaganaris2-3 annually,
3rd Wed, 7:30
a.m.

HEART Exec Director,
(650) 204-5640
Regional Housing Needs Policy Committee Latimerlo Jordan As Needed Carlos de Melo C/CAG - Sean Charpentier
(650)-599-1409
Peninsula Traffic Congestion Relief Alliance
(Commute.org) –
Commute.org’s mission is to reduce the
number of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by
commuters to decrease congestion,
improve the environment, and enhance
quality of life. The Board has five scheduled
meetings each year for the purpose of
adopting a work plan and budget,
Latimerlo Jordan Even months
3rd Thursday,
8 am
Public Works Director
60 Updated, December 9, 2025 6 | P a g e
developing policy, and reviewing
Commute.org performance.

Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE) -
Peninsula Clean Energy is a communitycontrolled, not-for-profit, joint powers agency formed as a Community Choice
Aggregation (CCA) program by San Mateo
County and all 20 of its cities and towns in
2016 and joined by the City of Los Banos in
2020.

McCune Mates 4th Thursdays
6:30 p.m.

City Manager
Peninsula Division, League of CA Cities -
State and local legislative issues
(All Councilmembers invited)- The Peninsula
Division includes 36 cities in San Francisco,
San Mateo, and Santa Clara counties and
provides members with the opportunity to
exchange ideas and information and share
the advantages of cooperative advocacy.

Mayor Vice
Mayor
Quarterly
dinner
meetings
League of CA Cities
San Mateo County Library JPA -
Policy direction, oversee budget, services &
library programs for the JPA related library
system
Mates PangMaganaris Quarterly plus
one
2nd Monday,
8:00 A.M.

Ann-Marie Despaine, Library
Director
San Mateo County Mosquito and Vector
Control District -
Independent Special District, the Board of
Trustees consists of 21 members, one from
each city and one representative for the
County at-large. Trustees are appointed by
their respective City Council to govern the
Mosquito and Vector Control District
Citizen
Representative:

Chuck Cotton
Term expires
12/24
n/a Monthly 2nd
Tuesday, 7:30
pm
650-344-8592
61 Updated, December 9, 2025 7 | P a g e
San Mateo County Pre-Hospital Emergency
Services JPA –
The San Mateo County Pre-Hospital
Emergency Medical Services Group
provides service to the residents and
visitors of San Mateo County to advance life
support first response fire companies to
respond to all 911 emergency medical
requests, to work in tandem with hospital
transport and support partners.

PangMaganarisMcCune Quarterly North County Fire Authority (650) 991-5531
[email protected]
San Mateo County Emergency Service
CouncilDisaster Preparedness
McCune PangMaganarisQuarterly
3rd Thursday,
5:30 p.m.,
Courthouse
[email protected]
650-363-7490
San Mateo County
Council of Cities/City Selection Committee-
(All Councilmembers invited)
Mayor Vice
Mayor
MonthlyDinner
meeting
4th Friday,
6:00 p.m.

Sukhmani Purewal 650) 363-
1802
[email protected]
SBWMA (South Bay Waste Management
Authority – “RethinkWaste”) -
RethinkWaste, also known as the South
Bayside Waste Management Authority
(SBWMA), is a joint powers authority
formed by eleven local government
jurisdictions in San Mateo County.

California. The agency provides oversight,
support and management of service
providers that collect, process, recycle and
dispose of materials on behalf of
RethinkWaste agencies.

McCune Latimerlo 4th Thursdays,
2:00 p.m., San
Carlos
Public Works Director
62 Updated, December 9, 2025 8 | P a g e
SFO Roundtable -
The Airport/Community Roundtable was
established in 1981 to address community
noise impacts from aircraft operations at
San Francisco International Airport (SFO).

Jordan
McCune
1st
Wednesday of
Month
6 x yr., 7:00
p.m.

Diane Estipona, Clerk of the
Roundtable
[email protected]
San Mateo Consolidated Fire Department -
established January 2019 The department
was formed by the establishment of a Joint
Powers Authority (JPA) and represents the
merger of fire departments in San Mateo,
Foster City, and Belmont. The Board of
Directors for the Department is comprised
of a Council member from each partner
city.

Mates McCune Quarterly City Manager
THESE APPOINTMENTS ARE MADE BY THE CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE (Council of Cities):

Association of Bay Area Governments
Regional planning agency for land use, housing,
environmental quality, and economic
development
Local Agency Formation Commission
(LAFCO)
Authority over all reorganizations &
boundary changes within County
Bay Area Air Quality Management
District
Works to reduce air contaminants
within the District
Metropolitan Transportation Commission
(MTC)
Reviews applications for state & federal
transportation funds, maintains regional
transportation plan for Bay Area
California Identification System (Cal-ID)
Determine the placement of RandomAccess Network equipment within the County
Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board
(Caltrain)
Set policy for operation of Peninsula
Commute Service
Community Development Committee Supplemental Law Enforcement Oversight Committee
Review Supplemental Law Enforcement
Service Fund expenditures
Domestic Violence Council
Evaluate efforts to reduce domestic
violence, raise public awareness and
collect statistics
63 Updated, December 9, 2025 9 | P a g e
San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) San Mateo County Transportation Authority (SAMTAC)
HEART (Housing Endowment and
Regional Trust) Board
THESE APPOINTMENTS ARE MADE THROUGH C/CAG:
2020 Peninsula Gateway Corridor Airport Land Use Committee (ALUC) Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC)
Congestion Management Program and
Environmental Quality Committee (CMEQ)
Congestion Management Program
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
Technical Advisory Committee (NPDES) -
Integrated Waste management (SWAC) Utilities Sustainability Task Force (USTF)
64

Page 1 of 2 ends

Establishment of Director of Special Projects Classification - Staff Report

STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: January 27, 2026
Agency: City of Belmont
Staff Contact: Afshin Oskoui, City Manager
Agenda Title: Establishment of Director of Special Projects Classification Agenda Action: Resolution
Recommendation
Adopt a resolution establishing the classification of Director of Special Projects, approving the associated job description, and authorizing the City Manager to implement the classification, including placement within the City’s salary schedule.

Strategic Focus Area
Fiscal and Organizational Sustainability
Background
The City continues to experience increasing complexity in policy development, project delivery, and intergovernmental coordination. Many of the City’s most significant initiatives require sustained executive attention, cross-departmental alignment, and coordination with external agencies, private-sector partners, and the community.

Historically, these responsibilities have been absorbed by the City Manager and department heads in addition to their core operational duties. As the scope and scale of City initiatives have expanded, this approach has become increasingly challenging and may impact the City’s ability to advance strategic priorities in a timely and coordinated manner.

The position is intended to provide senior-level leadership, coordination, and implementation capacity for high-priority initiatives that span multiple departments and external stakeholders, including economic development, capital improvement programs, housing initiatives, and policy development and implementation.

The proposed classification provides organizational flexibility to respond to evolving priorities without creating a new department or expanding existing departmental structures. This approach is consistent with best practices and aligns with the City’s strategic and operational needs.

Analysis
The Director of Special Projects will serve as a senior advisor to the City Manager and executive leadership team, with responsibility for leading and coordinating complex initiatives that cut across departmental boundaries. Unlike department head positions, this role is not focused on the ongoing delivery of a single service area, but rather on achieving enterprise-wide outcomes and advancing City 65

Page 2 of 2 ends

Establishment of Director of Special Projects Classification - Staff Report Council priorities.

Key functional areas anticipated for this role include, but are not limited to:
• Economic development and strategic investment initiatives • Capital improvement program coordination and delivery support • Housing policy and implementation initiatives
• Special policy studies, succession planning and organizational initiatives • Interagency and public-private partnership efforts
The flexible structure of the classification allows assignments to evolve based on City needs, emerging priorities, and Council direction. The proposed classification is appropriately positioned at a senior executive level, typically reporting directly to the City Manager and operating with a high degree of independent judgment and discretion.

Similar positions are commonly compensated at a level below Assistant City Manager classifications, reflecting the absence of direct departmental oversight while recognizing the high level of responsibility, political sensitivity, and organizational impact associated with the role.

Fiscal Impact
The establishment of the Director of Special Projects classification does not, itself, create a fiscal impact.

Any future decision to fill the position would be subject to budget authorization through the annual budget process or separate City Council action.

Salary placement will be determined consistent with the City’s compensation philosophy and salary schedule and is anticipated to be positioned below the Assistant City Manager classification.

Alternatives

1. Take no action

2. Refer back to staff for additional information
Attachments
A. Resolution
B. Director of Special Projects – Job Description
Fiscal Impact
☒ No Fiscal Impact
☐ Funding Source Confirmed:

Source: Purpose: Public Outreach:

Staff Discretionary Action Posting of Agenda
66

Page 1 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026 –

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELMONT

ESTABLISHING THE DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL PROJECTS CLASSIFICATION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Belmont is committed to ensuring the effective implementation of City Council priorities and the efficient delivery of complex, cross-departmental initiatives; and,
WHEREAS, the City increasingly undertakes special projects and initiatives that require senior-level coordination across multiple City departments, external agencies, privatesector partners, and the community; and, WHEREAS, the City Manager has identified a need for a flexible, executive-level classification within the City Manager’s Office to lead and coordinate high-priority initiatives related to economic development, capital improvement programs, housing, policy development, and organizational priorities; and,
WHEREAS, staff has reviewed comparable classifications in peer cities and agencies and determined that the creation of a Director of Special Projects classification is consistent with prevailing municipal best practices; and,
WHEREAS, establishing the Director of Special Projects classification will provide organizational capacity and flexibility without creating a new department or expanding existing departmental structures.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Belmont resolves as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby establishes the classification of Director of Special Projects, reporting directly to the City Manager or designee, and approves the associated job description on file with the Human Resources.

SECTION 2. The Director of Special Projects classification shall be designated as an atwill, unrepresented executive position, with salary placement to be established within the City’s salary schedule consistent with the City’s compensation philosophy.

SECTION 3. The City Manager is authorized to implement the Director of Special Projects classification and take all administrative actions necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution.
* * *
67

Page 2 of 2 ends

ADOPTED January 27, 2026 by the City of Belmont City Council by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

ATTEST:

City Clerk Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney
68 Adopted CC: xx
Unrepresented Bargaining Group
FLSA Status: Exempt

DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL PROJECTS

DEFINITION
Under the direction of the City Manager, the Director of Special Projects initiates, oversees, and leads complex, high-priority special projects and Citywide initiatives that span the interests of multiple City departments and external stakeholders. Projects frequently involve coordination with other governmental agencies, the private sector, and the general public.

The position exercises a high degree of independent judgment, discretion, and political acumen in the formulation, coordination, and implementation of City policies, programs, and strategic initiatives.

The Director of Special Projects serves as a senior advisor to the City Manager and executive leadership team and plays a key role in advancing City Council and organizational priorities across a range of policy, operational, capital, economic development, and housing-related initiatives.

Distinguishing Characteristics
This is a senior‑level classification responsible for Citywide coordination and implementation of complex initiatives characterized by significant policy, operational, financial, and organizational impact. The position operates with broad authority to integrate work across departments, resolve competing priorities, and align resources in support of strategic objectives. The Director of Special Projects differs from department head classifications in that it focuses on cross‑cutting initiatives and enterprise‑wide outcomes, rather than direct management of a single service area.

Essential Function Statements
Essential and other important responsibilities and duties may include, but are not limited to, the following:
• As assigned, initiates, leads, and serves as executive project manager for complex, multifaceted City initiatives, including but not limited to economic development, capital improvement programs, housing initiatives, policy development, and organizational priorities.
• Translates City Council and City Manager priorities into actionable work programs, implementation plans, and performance outcomes. 69 • Formulates, recommends, and administers policies, procedures, and implementation frameworks governing assigned special projects and Citywide initiatives.
• Establishes long-range goals, milestones, and performance measures for assigned initiatives and monitors progress toward outcomes. • Positions the City to effectively implement multi-departmental projects characterized by policy, procedural, financial, and political complexity. • Provides strategic advice, analysis, and recommendations to the City Manager, department heads, and City Council on assigned initiatives and emerging issues.
• Coordinates and facilitates collaboration among City departments, external agencies, community organizations, and private-sector partners. • Identifies risks, interdependencies, and implementation challenges and recommends mitigation strategies.
• Prepares and presents reports, staff analyses, and policy recommendations to the City Manager, advisory boards and commissions, and City Council. • Plans, assigns, and evaluates the work of professional, technical, and support staff, including project-based or matrixed supervision as assigned. • Supports organizational change management and cross-departmental alignment related to assigned initiatives.
• Performs related duties and responsibilities as required.

Minimum Qualifications
Sufficient education, training and/or work experience to demonstrate possession of the following knowledge and skills, which would typically be acquired through:
• Possession of a Bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university. A Master's degree in Public Administration, Business Administration, Urban Planning, Engineering or a related field is preferred.
• Ten (10) years of progressively responsible management experience in a municipal government or comparable public-sector environment, with at least two (2) years at a department head, assistant department head, or equivalent executive management level.

An equivalent combination of education and experience that demonstrates the required competencies may be considered.

Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities
• Knowledge of advanced project and program management principles, techniques, and best practices.
• Knowledge of municipal governance, organizational structures, and the delivery of public services.
• Knowledge of planning, land use, housing, economic development, and capital project processes as they relate to complex initiative coordination. • Knowledge of governmental policy development, implementation, and evaluation processes.
• Knowledge of mediation, negotiation, and conflict-resolution techniques. 70 • Knowledge of public-sector finance sufficient to evaluate capital, development, and programmatic initiatives.
• Demonstrated ability to lead complex, cross-departmental initiatives and achieve measurable outcomes.
• Demonstrated ability to exercise sound judgment, discretion, and political sensitivity in a public-sector environment.
• Strong written and verbal communication skills, including the ability to prepare clear, concise reports and make effective presentations to elected officials and diverse audiences.
• Strong interpersonal skills and the ability to build collaborative relationships with staff, elected and appointed officials, community stakeholders, and external partners.
• Ability to manage multiple priorities, adapt to changing organizational needs, and operate effectively in an ambiguous environment.

Working Conditions / Physical Requirements
Work is performed primarily in an office environment, with sustained posture in a seated position for prolonged periods of time. The position may require attendance at meetings outside of regular business hours.

Positions in this class typically require reaching, standing, walking, lifting, fingering, grasping, talking, hearing, seeing, and repetitive motions.

Light Work: Exerting up to 20 pounds of force occasionally, and/or up to 10 pounds of force frequently, and/or a negligible amount of force constantly to move objects. If the use of arm and/or leg controls requires exertion of forces greater than that for Sedentary Work and the worker sits most of the time, the job is rated for Light Work. .
71

Page 1 of 5 ends

Legislative Platform Update 2026 - Staff Report (1)

STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: January 27, 2026
Agency: City of Belmont
Staff Contact: Afshin Oskoui, City Manager, (650) 595-7408, [email protected] Agenda Title: State Legislative Advocacy for the City of Belmont – 2026 Update Agenda Action: Motion
Recommendation
Motion to reaffirm Belmont’s State and Federal Legislative Platform.

Strategic Focus Area
Fiscal and Organizational Sustainability
Background
The City’s Legislative Platform was last modified and adopted by the City Council on March 11, 2025.

The City has retained the California Public Policy Group (CPPG) for several consecutive years to provide state legislative advocacy and consulting services. CPPG provides guidance and advocacy on legislation affecting housing, land use, transportation, infrastructure, environmental sustainability, public safety, emergency management, local government finance, and governmental operations that may impact the City’s authority, operations, or fiscal condition.

In November 2025, CPPG transmitted its End of Year Report summarizing advocacy activities conducted on behalf of the City during the 2025 legislative year. During this period, CPPG worked closely with City staff to advance Belmont’s priorities, mitigate adverse legislative impacts, and identify opportunities for funding and policy engagement. Advocacy efforts included legislative monitoring, bill analysis, direct engagement with state legislators and Administration officials, coalition coordination, budget advocacy, and the preparation of position letters and memoranda for City consideration.

Over the course of the year, CPPG tracked and assessed more than 900 pieces of legislation for potential impacts to the City. The City adopted formal positions on multiple legislative measures, achieving favorable outcomes or securing meaningful amendments in the majority of cases. CPPG also represented the City’s fiscal interests in ongoing Vehicle License Fee (VLF) advocacy, successfully restoring $1.1 million of over $1.8 million in previously expected revenue for the City in the FY 2025-26 state budget. 72

Page 2 of 5 ends

Legislative Platform Update 2026 - Staff Report (1) – Legislative Platform Update

PIECES OF LEGISLATION TRACKED ON

BEHALF OF THE CITY
Legislation tracked and assessed for impacts on the City to its legal, operational, or fiscal authority and decision making.

SUCCESS RATE ON LEGISLATIVE
ENGAGEMENT—MAKING THE CITY’S

VOICE HEARD
CPPG achieved the desired outcome or secured critical
amendments to dramatically reduce adverse impacts to the City. (11 desired outcomes out of 15 total positions.)

COMBINED DELIVERABLES AND

TOUCHPOINTS
Legislative updates, position letters, policy and political analyses, and meetings with the City and/or with the
Administration or the Legislature on behalf of the City. *From November 1, 2024 to October 31, 2025.

Analysis
2026 Legislative Platform Overview
The purpose of the City’s Legislative Platform is to provide a clear policy framework to guide advocacy efforts and enable timely responses to proposed state and federal legislation. The Platform reflects the City Council’s strategic priorities and supports staff and CPPG in engaging in issues affecting local control, public safety, fiscal stability, infrastructure investment, environmental sustainability, and quality of life for Belmont residents.

An active legislative advocacy program ensures that City leadership remains informed of evolving state initiatives and that the City’s perspective is communicated early and effectively in the legislative process.

The Platform also authorizes correspondence and engagement by the Mayor and City Council, City Manager, and CPPG with state and federal officials as needed. 900+
73%
310+
73

Page 3 of 5 ends

Legislative Platform Update 2026 - Staff Report (1) – Legislative Platform Update Review of the Current Legislative Platform:

In advance of the 2026 legislative session, CPPG conducted “deep dive” meetings with City leadership and department heads to review ongoing priorities, major projects, and anticipated policy and funding needs. These discussions informed a review of the City’s existing Legislative Platform to ensure alignment with current conditions and anticipated legislative activity.

Based on this review, CPPG has proposed targeted updates to the Platform in select policy areas, including:
• Fiscal And Administrative Initiatives
• Housing And Land Use
• Transportation
These proposed changes are intended to refine and clarify advocacy priorities rather than substantially alter the City’s policy direction. The Legislative Platform is designed to be a living document and is reviewed annually to remain responsive to changing legislative and fiscal conditions.

Legislative Environment and Timing:

Year two of the 25-26 legislative session formally began on January 5, 2026. This session includes leadership changes in the Senate and several state lawmakers now vying for the newly drawn congressional maps under Proposition 50.

Housing affordability, homelessness, public safety, climate resilience, governmental accountability, and local government authority remain central themes.

Key legislative dates include:
• January 31: Last day for two-year bills to advance out of their house of origin • February 20: Last day for the Legislature to introduce bills • March 25: Spring Recess begins upon adjournment
• April 6: Legislature reconvenes from Spring Recess
• Mid-May: Governor releases the May revision of the state budget • May 29: Last day for the Legislature to pass bills out of their house of origin • June 15: Legislature must pass the primary budget bill State Budget Overview and Implications for Local Government In January 2026, the Governor released his proposed FY 2026-27 state budget, characterized by the Administration as a “workload” budget that largely maintains existing programs while addressing a projected $2.9 billion deficit. While state revenues have benefited from stock market growth, both the Administration and the Legislative Analyst’s Office have cautioned about ongoing structural deficits, revenue volatility, and fiscal uncertainty driven by federal policy changes and economic conditions.

The proposed budget includes continued investment through the Climate Bond (Proposition 4), with funding allocated across categories such as water infrastructure, wildfire prevention, extreme heat mitigation, parks, and community resilience projects. These programs may present funding opportunities 74

Page 4 of 5 ends

Legislative Platform Update 2026 - Staff Report (1) – Legislative Platform Update for local agencies, though competition is expected to be significant.

The proposed budget again does not include full funding for outstanding Vehicle License Fee backfill obligations. CPPG will continue to work with the City, regional partners, and legislative leadership to pursue a permanent, policy-based solution.

Key Policy Themes Affecting the City
Local Government Revenue: Ongoing fiscal pressure at the state level continues to create risk for local revenue sources. Proposals affecting transfer taxes, mitigation fees, and other local funding mechanisms are expected to reemerge. Protecting local fiscal authority remains a core advocacy priority heading into the 2026 legislative session.

Housing and Land Use: The Legislature continues to advance policies aimed at increasing housing production, often through limits on local discretion. While some policymakers have begun acknowledging broader market constraints, the overall trend toward state preemption of local land use authority is expected to continue. CPPG will monitor and engage on legislation affecting zoning authority, development fees, CEQA, and housing approvals.

California Environmental Quality Act: Major CEQA reforms enacted in 2025 addressed several longstanding issues but also created the potential for follow-up “clean-up” legislation in 2026. Additional statutory changes or ballot measure activity could further affect local implementation responsibilities and litigation exposure.

Public Safety and Governmental Operations: Public safety funding, implementation of voter-approved measures, labor-sponsored legislation, and proposals affecting transparency, contracting, and the use of artificial intelligence by public agencies are anticipated areas of legislative activity in 2026.

CPPG Work Plan
Throughout the 2026 legislative session, CPPG will continue to engage with the City’s legislative delegation, state agencies, and legislative leadership to ensure the City of Belmont is informed and wellpositioned. Ongoing services include:
• Monitoring, tracking, and analyzing legislation relevant to the City’s priorities • Advising City staff and Council on legislative and budgetary developments • Drafting position letters and advocacy materials as directed • Engaging with state agencies and legislative committees • Identifying and assisting with grant and funding opportunities • Providing regular legislative updates and briefings
Alternatives

1. Provide direction and postpone for future discussion.

Attachments
A. Redlined Draft revisions and comments to 2025 Legislative Platform 75

Page 5 of 5 ends

Legislative Platform Update 2026 - Staff Report (1) – Legislative Platform Update Fiscal Impact
☒ No Fiscal Impact
☐ Funding Source Confirmed:

Source: Purpose: Public Outreach:

Staff Council Vision/Priority Posting of Agenda

76 Proposed Belmont Legislative Platform 2025
City of Belmont

STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM
2026 LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM UPDATE
Platform Overview
The Legislative Platform contains broad policy statements pertaining to a variety of issues that impact the City of Belmont—reflecting the mission, vision and values of the City to enrich the quality of life for our community with services that provide for a safe, fulfilling and vibrant life.

The Legislative Platform provides a policy framework for the City to respond to state and federal legislative issues important to the City in a timely manner. Outlining policy guidelines will also serve to provide direction to City staff and legislative consultants to engage on state legislation on behalf of the City in real time—including correspondence from the Mayor or City Manager to the Legislature and/or Congress.

The City’s primary legislative focus include: protecting local government control, improving public safety, maintaining local government revenue, obtaining funding for environmental sustainability, transportation, recreational, technology and infrastructure improvements.

Furthermore, our focus remains committed to finding ways to work collaboratively with federal, state and local partners to further our City’s ability to achieve its strategic goals.

Legislative Issues
Local Control
The City values its ability and authority to exercise local control and to protect and enhance the quality of life for Belmont’s residents. Support Legislation that enhances local control of resources and that allows cities to address the needs of local constituents within a framework of regional cooperation. Encourage the use of federal and state incentives for local government action rather than mandates (funded or unfunded).

Oppose preemption of local authority whether by state or federal legislation or ballot propositions. Support efforts to streamline regulations that simplify the job of running a city and oppose efforts that erode the city’s authority to control its own affairs.

Governmental Transparency and Public Access
Support legislation that balances increased public trust, confidence, and access to public meetings while realizing the fiscal and operational constraints of local government. 77 Proposed Belmont Legislative Platform 20265
Support legislation that would increase civic participation and engagement, including the allowance of legislative subcommittees, advisory committees, and commissions to participate virtually without physical location posting requirements under the Ralph M. Brown Act.

Monitor and Evaluate proposed policies related to the use of technology in government operations including the use of artificial intelligence pertaining to ethical considerations, privacy, and emerging technologies, and cybersecurity measures.

Monitor and Evaluate funding opportunities for local governments to bolster economic development with workforce training to evolve with emergent technologies, as well as protect local communications infrastructure and capabilities.

Fiscal and Administrative Initiatives
Support fiscal sustainability and “best in class” administrative initiatives to ensure the delivery of superlative city services. Monitor initiatives which seek changes in fiscal relationships at the local, state and federal level, and support legislation that guarantees ongoing revenue sources for local government.

Support opportunities that allow the City to compete for its fair share of regional, state and federal funding, and that maintain funding streams. Opportunities may include competitive grant and funding programs. Pursue funding opportunities for public facilities and services including capital improvement projects, public works projects, homeland security, library, parks and social service facilities.

Support legislative, administrative and/ or funding mechanisms that enable the City to better provide core services and respond to the needs of its residents. Options may include regional service delivery, flexibility around seasonal workforce, project specific workforce or other innovate tools to adapt to changing fiscal conditions and resident’s needs.

Support long term statutory solutions to adequately reimburse cities from the Vehicle License Fee (VLF) Swap of 2004 as well as short term, temporary adjustments.

Oppose efforts to decrease, restrict, eliminate, seize, divert, supplant, or otherwise restrict local revenues. Oppose any efforts at the state level to eliminate, restrict, or redirect revenues currently dedicated to local government for state purposes.

Oppose unfunded or underfunded mandates that undermine local fiscal solvency.

Support legislation that preserves the integrity of the local collective bargaining processes and maintains a level playing field for negotiations. Oppose measures that mandate specific benefits or terms that undermine the ability of local governments to engage in meaningful dialogue and reach mutually beneficial agreements with our bargaining units.

Commented [CS1]: Proposed addition.
78 Proposed Belmont Legislative Platform 20265
Support legislation authorizing Job Order Contracting (JOC) for general law cities, allowing Belmont to efficiently deliver small- and medium-scale maintenance, repair, and energyefficiency projects.

Support alternative project delivery methods, including design-build for energy efficiency and EV infrastructure projects.

Housing and Land Use
Support legislation that takes a comprehensive approach to housing production, recognizing all factors that contribute to the State’s housing crisis, and worksworking to close the economic gap, ensuring projects are feasible without imposing excessive financial burdens on cities.

Support incentive-based housing legislation to encourage expanding affordable housing supply including development of fiscal tools and incentives to assist local governments in their efforts to encourage housing, finance the infrastructure to support housing, establish an ongoing state commitment to funding affordable housing, and fund and support affordable housing programs, including supportive housing programs and necessary infrastructure.

Support funding programs that promote the development and enhancement of safe, affordable, and accessible housing within the City for all economic segments of the population, including workforce housing.

Support reforms and improvements to housing element law to provide clear processes and flexibility to allow regional cooperation and establish realistic housing goals and performance standards—including modifications in criteria to meet the State’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) goals.

Support reforms to the Density Bonus Law and related statutes to restore local discretion, ensure concessions are demonstrably cost-justified, and prevent automatic waivers that undermine adopted community plans.

Support legislation that provides incentives (tax benefits, grants, loans, credits for affordable units) to local agencies, private developers and non-profit groups in order to rehabilitate residential units and commercial properties.

Monitor and evaluate housing proposals that take a “one-size-fits-all” approach. Specifically, advocate for modifications in proposals to recognize and incentivize communities like Belmont that are good actors in addressing community-housing needs.

Oppose state mandated attempts to usurp local discretion over matters relating to local housing and land use policies. Oppose legislation that overrides locally adopted specific plans, Commented [CS2]: Proposed addition to advocate for
JOC.

Commented [CS3]: Proposed addition based upon
trends.

Commented [DH4]: Proposed addition in response to
11/20 staff planning session.
79 Proposed Belmont Legislative Platform 20265
especially where the City has invested significant public resources in long-range planning efforts.

Oppose inflexible statutory deadlines, including completeness review mandates, that shift liability to local governments without providing additional resources or staffing support.

Advocate for recognition and use of inclusionary housing requirements as a condition of development and other tools in an effort to incorporate affordable housing into market rate development.

Support funding opportunities provided to local jurisdictions through statewide bond efforts.

Support efforts to provide dedicated funding and technical assistance to local governments to adopt and implement plans and process improvements and for the administration and ongoing compliance of state housing programs.

Review and evaluate legislation that would directly tie production mandates to the regional housing needs assessment process.

Transportation
Support state and federal legislation that enhances the safety of the City’s streets for automobile, bicycle and pedestrian traffic, including issues related to speed enforcement, traffic congestion reduction programs and regional transportation improvements.

Support protection of dedicated transportation-related tax revenues and enhance the ability of local agencies to finance local transportation programs and facilities (e.g. Gas Tax, State bond funds).

Support efforts to maximize the State’s purchasing power to lower materials costs for local streets and road repair.

Support federal and state funding and policy goals to enhance multi-modal transportation efforts.

Support and advocate for clear investments to make public transportation an accessible, affordable, and sustainable alternative to driving, especially efforts to enhance local multi modal transportation options.

Support legislation that strengthens safety standards for electric bicycles, including limits on user modification, enhanced rider training and licensing requirements, prohibitions on manufacturers or sellers encouraging or facilitating unlawful speed alterations, and age restrictions for higherspeed classes of e-bikes.

Commented [CS5]: Proposed addition in recognition of
recent trends.

Commented [CS6]: Proposed addition in recognition of
recent trends.

Commented [DH7]: Proposed addition in response to
11/20 staff planning session.
80 Proposed Belmont Legislative Platform 20265
Environmental Sustainability
Support cost-effective, sustainable and responsible environmental policy programs in the areas of energy efficiency, greenhouse gases, climate change, wastewater, solid waste removal and stormwater, among others. Support measures that expand markets for recyclable materials and maintain local authority and flexibility to regulate solid waste and recyclables.

Oppose waste and resource recovery measures imposing state-mandated costs when there is no guarantee of local cost recovery or offsetting benefit.

Community Services
Support funding for ADA facility and park upgrades. Promote legislation that provides for increased services to or funding for youth and at-risk populations such as the frail elderly, homeless, disabled and other challenged populations.

Support funding for vital regional and community services including access to parks, open space, bike lanes, after school programming, youth services, senior services, food programs, facilities that provide critical community services, protect natural resources, promote resource management, and strengthen safety and security. Oppose efforts that erode funding for these vital regional and community services.

Infrastructure Maintenance and Rehabilitation
Support legislation and policies that promote investing in the maintenance and rehabilitation of aging infrastructure (streets, stormwater, wastewater, parks and facilities). Support the lowering of the threshold for voter-approved capital financing and opportunities for innovative public financing.

Support legislation and funding opportunities that would help the City fund improvements for parks, open space, green infrastructure, and fuel mitigation and reduction.

Support legislation and funding opportunities that enhance the capacity of local government to enact climate change adaptation and mitigation, promote disaster risk reduction and community resilience, and/or advance sustainability through capital improvement to City facilities.

Utilities
Support efforts that maintain the ability to retain existing fees on telecommunications services and for public, educational and governmental channels. Oppose efforts to restrict the authority of cities to zone and plan for the deployment of telecommunications infrastructure. Support the ability of cities to maintain and manage the public right-of-way and receive compensation for its use.

Support California PUC efforts to require enhanced, more effective and timely notification for planned and unplanned repairs resulting in power outages to customers. Monitor California PUC 81 Proposed Belmont Legislative Platform 20265
regulatory system for impacts to overall safety, health, and quality of life of the residents of Belmont.

Public Safety
Support legislative efforts to improve local law enforcement, fire suppression and prevention, hazardous materials mitigation, rescue, emergency medical services, and disaster preparedness.

Including legislation and grant funding opportunities for innovate fire mitigation planning suppression technology.

Support legislation that provides affordable home-insurance rates for at-risk residents including policies that stabilize the California FAIR plan.

Support legislation that promotes and strengthens law enforcement and first-responder access to mental health services, including peer support, training, family resources, suicide prevention, and other promising practices for wellness programs.

Support forward thinking legislative, administrative and funding polices that promote civic engagement, community partnerships and public education.

Support legislative efforts to grant state and federal funding to supplement local law enforcement to increase staffing, equipment and capital improvements to maintain public safety.

Evaluate legislation on implementation of best practices regarding law enforcement procedures and policies.
82

Page 1 of 3 ends

Redwood Shores Sea Level Rise Protection Project - Staff Report.docx

STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: January 27, 2026
Agency: City of Belmont
Staff Contact: Elizabeth Wada, Senior Civil Engineer, [email protected] Agenda Title: Redwood Shores Sea Level Rise Protection Project Agenda Action: Discussion & Direction
Recommendation
This is an informational item only; no action is required.

Strategic Focus Area
Infrastructure and Mobility
Background
The Redwood Shores Sea Level Rise Protection Project is a multi-jurisdictional shoreline resilience and flood protection effort led by the City of Redwood City. The project is being developed to address existing and future tidal flooding risks within Redwood City identified by FEMA and regional sea level rise guidance by upgrading and adapting the Redwood Shores levee system between Belmont Creek and Pulgas Creek. Project partners include the Cities of Redwood City, Belmont, and San Carlos, along with San Mateo County, and SamTrans. Schaaf and Wheeler have been selected as project design consultant, with OneShoreline supporting the project in the spirit of multi-jurisdictional collaboration and project delivery as encouraged by the Regional Shoreline Adaptation Plan (RSAP) and Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC).

The majority of the proposed levee
improvements providing flood
protection benefits are located within
the City of Redwood City, with
smaller portions within Belmont and
San Carlos. Some portions of the
regional levee system may also
provide secondary or incidental flood
protection benefits. The currently
proposed scope of study is shown in
Figure 1, with Figure 2 illustrating
the Island Park alignment (in red) that
could be added to the scope.

Figure 1
83

Page 2 of 3 ends

Redwood Shores Sea Level Rise Protection Project - Staff Report.docx Figure 1
Analysis
Project Ownership and Belmont’s Role
Belmont’s potential collaboration in the Redwood Shores Sea Level Rise Protection Project will be to evaluate the need and effectiveness of a potential Belmont Creek Levee as shown in Figure 1.

Additionally, Redwood City has invited Belmont to evaluate whether levee protection measures in the Island Park neighborhood should be considered as a potential component of the broader regional project.

The potential inclusion of the Island Park neighborhood is at an early, exploratory stage. Unlike other portions of the regional levee system, levee improvements in the Island Park area would primarily benefit the City of Belmont. As a result, inclusion of this area would likely require Belmont to consider future funding and long-term maintenance responsibilities associated with any improvements specific to the Island Park neighborhood. No commitment has been made regarding project design, construction funding, or long-term maintenance responsibilities related to the Island Park neighborhood, and consideration of this area does not obligate the City to proceed with future project phases.

Flood Risk and Regional Context
Looking ahead, as sea level rise, higher tides, and storm surge intensify over time, the Island Park neighborhood is expected to become increasingly vulnerable to tidal flooding associated with San Francisco Bay and Belmont Slough. While these conditions are not currently being experienced, they represent foreseeable long-term risks. Existing flood protection in the neighborhood is primarily provided by privately owned seawalls along the island’s perimeter, which may offer limited effectiveness as future conditions evolve. Addressing flood risk in Island Park as a standalone City project would likely be infeasible due to the high costs, extensive permitting requirements, and the need for coordinated planning and implementation with adjacent shoreline jurisdictions.

Shoreline protection projects of this type typically require permits and approvals from multiple regulatory 84

Page 3 of 3 ends

Redwood Shores Sea Level Rise Protection Project - Staff Report.docx agencies, including the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Evaluating the Island Park area within the context of a larger regional project provides an opportunity to leverage coordinated environmental review and technical analysis.

Coordination Benefits and Evaluation Objectives
Participation in the Redwood Shores Sea Level Rise Protection Project provides the City of Belmont with an opportunity to coordinate with a larger, grant funded regional effort led by the City of Redwood City that is already advancing flood protection planning, environmental review, and long-term sea level rise adaptation across jurisdictional boundaries. This approach allows Belmont to leverage shared technical studies, coordinated shoreline planning, and economies of scale that would not be achievable through a Belmont-only project. For Belmont, consideration of participation related to the Island Park neighborhood is intended to:
• Evaluate opportunities to reduce future tidal flooding risk in the Island Park neighborhood, • Assess whether a continuous connection between the regional levee system and Belmont’s existing high ground,
• Avoid potential gaps in shoreline protection between adjacent jurisdictions, • Explore opportunities for shoreline access and community benefits where feasible, and, • Allow future consideration of long-term cost, maintenance responsibilities, and potential funding strategies.

The project is currently in the planning and alternatives analysis phase. The City of Redwood City is scheduled to present to its City Council on February 9, 2026. Following Council feedback, staff anticipates returning at a future date with a request to authorize funding for a feasibility study as part of the regional collaborative with Redwood City and other regional partners.

Alternatives

1. None.

Attachments
A. Redwood Shores Sea Level Rise Protection Project PowerPoint Fiscal Impact
☒ No Fiscal Impact
Receiving this project presentation has no direct fiscal impact.

If the project moves forward, funding will be contingent on Council approval and budget appropriation.
☐ Funding Source Confirmed:

Source: Purpose: Public Outreach:

Staff Council Vision/Priority Posting of Agenda*
*Notifications for this meeting were sent to the property owners of the Island Park neighborhood. 85 Redwood Shores Sea Level Rise Protection Project
Presentation to Belmont City Council

01.27.2026
86 Presentation materials prepared in collaboration with:

Redwood City
Department of Engineering and Transportation
Schaaf & Wheeler Consulting Civil Engineers
CMG Landscape Architecture
Civic Edge Consulting, Community Engagement
ESA - Environmental Science Associates
ENGEO, Geotechnical Engineering
87 Flooded Bay Trail along Belmont Slough (2024)
California King Tides Project
Why has Redwood City started this project?
88 Land Use + Critical Infrastructure
What’s at risk
San Carlos Airport
SamTrans Bus
Depot
Sandpiper Community
Center & School
Wastewater
Treatment Plant
Redwood Shores
Elementary School
and Daycare Center
Redwood LIFE Campus
Oracle
campus
Design Tech
High School
Commercial Hub
Redwood Shores
Branch Library
Redwood City Fire
Station
The Redwood Shores Levee Project will protect
private homes and assets as well as critical
infrastructure, public amenities, and economy
drivers.

This project is not just for Redwood Shores
residents – it has importance for the city and
region more broadly.

Preschool
Daycare Center
Daycare Center
Preschool
89 Redwood City’s Project Objectives
Multi-benefit approach to flood protection
The Redwood Shores Sea Level Rise Protection Project
will protect homes, schools, businesses, and critical
infrastructure by addressing flood risk identified by
FEMA and projected future sea level rise.

The project will also integrate opportunities for naturebased solutions where feasible along a raised and strengthened Redwood Shores levee, while enhancing
recreational amenities for the community.
90 Project Setting
91 Project Need
FEMA Requirements
The Redwood Shores levee
system does not meet current
requirements for FEMA
certification.

Without adaptation.
homeowners will be required
to purchase flood insurance in
the near future.
92 Project Need
Sea Level Rise and Future Coastal Flood Risk
By 2050, the many areas of the existing
levee will be overtopped during extreme
tide events. By 2100, overtopping may
happen daily.
93 Redwood City Council will Decide
How and when should we adapt?
TODAY 2100
PHASED APPROACH:

NEAR-TERM
Build to Elevation 13.5 now;
provides protection beyond
1ft of sea level rise.

PHASED APPROACH:

LONG-TERM
Raise levees and add walls to reach
elevation 16; provides protection
beyond 3ft of sea level rise. Timing
dependent on rate of sea level rise.

PROTECT FOR THE LONGTERM
Build to Elevation 16 now;
provides protection beyond
3ft of sea level rise.

Both approaches will require periodic monitoring to assess rate of sea level rise and potential subsidence. *Approximate project construction timeline.

Existing
Conditions
Levee elevations
between 10-12
2030-2035*
94 Future phase - raise levee to
Elevation 16.

Future phase adds flood wall – provides
protection to elevation 16.

Wall not to exceed 3.5ft in height.

Phased Approach
Build to elevation 13.5 now; future adaptation to elevation 16 Build near-term levee
to elevation 13.5
Build near-term levee
to elevation 13.5
Earthen Levee – where space and geotechnical considerations allow Hybrid Approach – includes walls in some areas as required by spatial and geotechnical constraints 95 Earthen Levee – where space and geotechnical considerations allow Build Long-term Protection Now
Build to Elevation 16 in one phase
Build earthen levee to Elevation 16 now.

Provides long-term protection.

Build hybrid protection to Elevation 16 now.

Provides long-term protection.

Walls not to exceed 3.5ft in height.

Hybrid Approach – includes walls in some areas as required by spatial and geotechnical constraints 96 Ecology
Design Goals and Considerations – Reflects Community
Feedback to Date
• Protect habitat and minimize construction
impacts.
• Improve habitat function via native planting on all
levee slopes.
• Identify opportunities to enhance native
ecologies within the marsh transition zone.
• Expand marsh habitat where feasible – explore
levee setback to create transition zones.
• Explore opportunities to improve inland habitat –
transition horticultural landscapes to native
planting.
97 Tidal marsh restoration
– coordinate with
Redwood Life Project
Gravel Beach and
wetland at SVCW
northeast corner
Seasonal pond - partial
tidal marsh restoration
opportunity
Potential Ecological Measures
Opportunity areas for large scale
restoration or habitat expansion
The areas shown offer larger opportunities for
ecological enhancements, including tidal
marsh restoration and expansion.

The ecological suitability and technical
feasibility of these options will be assessed as
the project moves forward.

Radio Tower – partial
tidal marsh restoration
opportunity
98 Potential Ecological Measures
Shoreline areas with space for levee
setback
Creekside habitat
enhancements
Opportunties smaller
scale levee setback to
create pocket beaches
and/or transition zone
The areas shown offer more modest (but
still valuable) opportunities for ecological
enhancements.

Levee setback provides space for habitats to
transition over time as sea levels rise. Habitat
expansion can also improve ecosystem
connectivity, supporting sensitive tidal
wetland species.
99 • Provide improved trail amenities, including seating, shade, and opportunities to connect to the Bay (getdowns and overlooks). • Maintain the natural character of the shoreline and
the visual connection between public shoreline and
the Bay.
• Identify opportunities to create new open space
destinations with a wider range of amenities at key
shoreline connection points.

Placemaking, Public Access, and Trail Amenities
Project Goals
100
Proposed Bay Trail Adaptation
Improvement and Extension
Proposed Bay Trail
extension
Proposed Bay Trail
extension
Bay Trail shifts inland at
Redwood Life Campus.

Existing trail to remain.

The project includes adaptation and
improvement of the existing trail and access
points as well as two new stretches of Bay
Trail.

The adapted Bay Trail will be located on the new
levee and will meet current Bay Trail design
standards for width, materiality, and
accessibility.
101
Mariner Park improvement
opportunity
Sandpiper shoreline –
larger park improvement
opportunity
Shore Dogs Park
improvement opportunity
Trail intersection –
gateway opportunity
Preserve Park – already
operates as a
neighborhood connector
Regional connection
opportunity
Adapt existing overlooks
Shoreline
access
opportunity
Library area: Educational or
interpretive opportunity
Opportunities for Open Space
Enhancement
Building on Existing Community Assets
102
AFO
Ongoing Design
Placemaking and Trail Amenities
Conceptual programing including spaced
amenity clusters for diverse local and regional
user groups.

Update
graphic
to
current
version
103
Belmont Slough Overtops Island Park Levee (2026)
25-year Tide
How does Belmont fit in?
104
Multi-Jurisdictional Cooperation
Redwood City needs Belmont
Belmont Creek levee to
prevent “end around”
105
Multi-Jurisdictional Cooperation
Redwood City can help Belmont
Belmont Creek levee to
prevent “end around”
Opportunity to add a relatively small reach of
protection for economies of scale. The Island
Park reach represents a small incremental lift for
Redwood City but would be a more difficult
project to complete on its own.

Would need to resolve cost sharing and longterm maintenance responsibilities.

Island Park protection could be
included with the larger project
106
Multi-Jurisdictional Cooperation
Redwood City can help Belmont
Opportunity to add a relatively small reach of
protection for economies of scale. The Island
Park reach represents a small incremental lift for
Redwood City but would be a more difficult
project to complete on its own.

Would need to resolve cost sharing and longterm maintenance responsibilities. 107
Multi-Jurisdictional Cooperation
Redwood City can help Belmont
Opportunity to add a relatively small reach of
protection for economies of scale. The Island
Park reach represents a small incremental lift for
Redwood City but would be a more difficult
project to complete on its own.

Would need to resolve cost sharing and longterm maintenance responsibilities.

Project improvements in Belmont would be
designed with input from Belmont residents.
108
Taking Advantage of an Opportunity
2025-2026
60% Design
2026-2027
Environmental
Review and
Permitting
2028-2030
Final Design
2030-2034
Construction
Community Engagement
Throughout
109
Taking Advantage of an Opportunity
2025-2026
60% Design
2026-2027
Environmental
Review and
Permitting
2028-2030
Final Design
2030-2034
Construction
Community Engagement
Throughout
Belmont “Catchup”
110
Thank you!
111

Page 1 of 2 ends

Exception to CalPERS 180-Day Waiting Period - Interim Appointment Ann Ritzma - Staff Report – Retired Annuitant Appointment

STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: January 27, 2026
Agency: City of Belmont
Staff Contact: Afshin Oskoui, City Manager, [email protected], 650-595-7408 Agenda Title: CalPERS 180-Day Waiting Period Exception – Interim Administrative Services Director Appointment
Agenda Action: Resolution
Recommendation
Adopt a resolution approving an exception to the CalPERS 180-Day Waiting Period and Interim Appointment of Ann Ritzma to Administrative Services Director.

Strategic Focus Area
Fiscal and Organizational Sustainability
Background
The Administrative Services Director is an executive management position responsible for overseeing the day-to-day operations and long-term strategic functions of the Human Resources and Information Technology divisions.

The City initiated recruitment for the Administrative Services Director position in advance of a planned retirement in October 2025. Despite extensive outreach and recruitment efforts, the position has not yet been filled.

To maintain continuity of leadership and ensure uninterrupted operations, staff recommends appointing an interim Administrative Services Director for the duration of the recruitment. Ann Ritzma has agreed to continue serving in the role on an interim basis following her retirement date, until a permanent replacement is hired. This interim appointment is expected to remain in place until the vacancy is filled and will not exceed the CalPERS limit of 960 hours in a fiscal year.

Analysis
Under the California Government Code, a CalPERS retiree may return to work for a CalPERS employer in a retired annuitant position. The individual intended for the interim appointment is a CalPERS retiree; therefore, these requirements apply, including a mandatory 180 day waiting period following retirement before returning to work for any CalPERS employer.

There are limited exceptions to this waiting period. One such exception is the “interim vacant position” rule under Government Code section 7522.56, which allows a retiree to be appointed sooner if the position is deemed critically needed and the appointment is approved by the employer’s governing body at a public meeting. The City is requesting approval to use this exception for an interim vacant position. This would 112

Page 2 of 2 ends

Exception to CalPERS 180-Day Waiting Period - Interim Appointment Ann Ritzma - Staff Report – Retired Annuitant Appointment allow the temporary appointment of a retiree on a limited basis while an active recruitment for a permanent replacement is underway. Under the law, this type of interim appointment may be approved only once for a vacant position. The City has already authorized and initiated the recruitment for the permanent position, consistent with Government Code sections 7522.56 and 21221(h).

In accordance with CalPERS regulations, compensation received by Ms. Ritzma will be no less than the minimum and does not exceed the maximum monthly base salary paid to other employees performing comparable duties. The retiree will not be eligible for any additional benefits, incentives, compensation in lieu of benefits, or any other form of compensation beyond this monthly pay rate.

Alternatives

1. Provide Alternative Direction

2. Take No Action
Attachments
A. Resolution
Fiscal Impact
☐ No Fiscal Impact
☒ Funding Source Confirmed:

The Administrative Services Director position is included in the current personnel budget for the Administrative Services Department. No additional appropriation is needed.

Source: Purpose: Public Outreach:

Staff Statutory/Contractual Requirement Posting of Agenda 113

Page 1 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026 –

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELMONT REQUESTING A CALPERS 180-DAY WAIT PERIOD EXCEPTION FOR AN

INTERIM ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR APPOINTMENT
WHEREAS, in compliance with Government (Gov.) Code section 7522.56, the City Council must provide CalPERS this certification resolution when hiring a retiree before 180 days has passed since their retirement date; and,
WHEREAS, Ann Ritzma, CalPERS ID 3272964754, retired from the City of Belmont in the position of Interim Administrative Services Director, effective December 27, 2025; and, WHEREAS, Gov. Code section 7522.56 requires post-retirement employment commence no earlier than 180 days after the retirement date, which is June 26, 2026 without this certification resolution; and,
WHEREAS, Gov. Code section 7522.56 provides that this exception to the 180-day wait period shall not apply if the retiree accepts any retirement-related incentive; and, WHEREAS, the City Council, the City of Belmont and Ann Ritzma certify Ann Ritzma has not received a Golden Handshake or any other retirement-related incentive; and, WHEREAS, an appointment under Gov. Code section 21221(h) requires the retiree is appointed into the interim appointment during recruitment for a permanent appointment; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized the search for a permanent on October 31, 2025; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby appoints Ann Ritzma as an interim appointment retired annuitant to the vacant position of Administrative Services Director for the City of Belmont under Gov. Code section 21221(h) effective February 1, 2026; and, WHEREAS, this Gov. Code section 21221(h) appointment shall only be made once and there will end no later than February 1, 2027; and,
WHEREAS, the entire appointment document between Ann Ritzma and the City of Belmont has been reviewed by this body and is attached herein; and, WHEREAS, no matters, issues, terms or conditions related to this employment or appointment have been or will be placed on a consent calendar; and, WHEREAS, the employment shall be limited to 960 hours per fiscal year for all CalPERS employers; and,
WHERAS, the compensation paid to retirees cannot be less then the minimum or exceed the maximum monthly base salary paid to other employees performing comparable duties, divide by 173.333 to equal the hourly rate; and, 114

Page 2 of 2 ends

WHEREAS, the maximum base salary for this position is $22,617.41 and the hourly equivalent $130.49, and the minimum base salary for this position is $16,242.30 and the hourly equivalent is $93.71; and,
WHEREAS, the hourly rate paid to Ann Ritzma will be $130.49; and, WHEREAS, Ann Ritzma has not and will not receive any other benefit, incentive, compensation in lieu of benefit or other form of compensation in addition to this hourly pay rate; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Belmont hereby certifies the nature of the appointment of Ann Ritzma as described herein and detailed in the attached appointment document that this appointment is necessary to fill the critically needed position of Administrative Services Director for the City of Belmont by February 1, 2026 to ensure continuity of leadership and ensure uninterrupted operations * * *
ADOPTED January 27, 2026 by the City of Belmont City Council by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

ATTEST:

City Clerk Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney
115

"#$%#&'()*+,+)

-$$./012#

34#&567./012#8

9#2:;4#64<0==>>4&'=%0?/6/$04&/2#::=/$024$0#6#&40/&4<#$$%/0#$00=@#A#$0:=6/0/=$=> -<2/$/60&#0/@4B4&@/A463/&4A0=&*4>>4A0/@4C4D&%#&'(*+,+)7E;4#64$=04'=%&42:;='24$0/6 F=@4&$4<D'G#;EH.B&4F%;#0/=$6#$<60#0%0467-00#A?4<>=&'=%&&4>4&4$A4/6#A=:'=>0?4 IJKLMNOPQRKSTJUSVWXYZQS[\UVIJKLMNOM]PKV^]\WUY_U\`N\US`\]\WUabSUcd\W\`JK /$>=&2#0/=$=$e=&f/$F#>04&&40/&424$07

g?/6;4004&=%0;/$460c\U\`]hV_Uc\ISU^ihV__\`V_JSWU\`S]JPPVSWU]\WUJhJ`\US`\[JWWQSUJWU 0=0?4:=6/0/=$=>E%D;/Aj=&f63/&4A0=&7

(7-&40/&4<#$$%/0#$0/6A;#66/>/4<#6#$?=%&;'*042:=&#&'*#0ke/;;42:;='44#$</6$=0 `\P`\h\WU\[R^JWV_Uc\ISU^ihRJ`dJSWSWdd`VQP67

+7l=%&?=%&;':#'&#04<%&/$F'=%&042:=&#&'#::=/$024$0#6-<2/$/60&#0/@4B4&@/A46 3/&4A0=&e/;;D4mnog?/6?=%&;'&#04/6$=0;4660?#$0?42/$/2%2&#04=>pqr7s(=& 2=&40?#$0?42#t/2%2&#04=>(r,7uq>=&0?4@#A#$0-<2/$/60&#0/@4B4&@/A46 3/&4A0=&PVhSUSVWJhKShU\[SWUc\ISU^ihPQRKSTK^JvJSKJRK\PJ^hTc\[QK\w

r7l=%#&4$=04;/F/D;40=&4A4/@4#$'D4$4>/0*/$A4$0/@4*A=2:4$6#0/=$/$;/4%=&D4$4>/06*=& #$'=0?4&>=&2=>A=2:4$6#0/=$/$#<</0/=$0=0?4?=%&;':#'&#047g?4G/0'e/;;$=0 A=;;4A0=&:#'#$'&40/&424$0A=$0&/D%0/=$6>=&'=%&&40/&4<#$$%/0#$0e=&f7

u79$#AA=&<#$A4e/0?G#;EH.B&4F%;#0/=$6*0?4G/0'e/;;&4:=&0'=%&:#'&#04#$<#;;?=%&6 e=&f4<#6#&40/&4<#$$%/0#$00=G#;EH.B7

xy B?=%;<'=%#AA4:0#::=/$024$00=0?/6#0ke/;;*4t42:0*042:=&#&':=6/0/=$*'=%e/;; 64&@4#00?4</6A&40/=$=>0?4G/0'5#$#F4&#$<0?4G/0'2#'04&2/$#04'=%& #::=/$024$0#0#$'0/247

z{-6#G#;EH.B&40/&4<#$$%/0#$0*'=%e/;;D46%D|4A00=}=@4&$24$0G=<4B4A0/=$+(++u #$<A#$e=&f$=2=&40?#$q),?=%&6/$#>/6A#;'4#&~"%;'("%$4r,*>=& 42:;='24$0e/0?#;;G#;EH.B42:;='4&6A=2D/$4<7

£¤¥¢¤¥¦ §¨©¤¨¥¥ª£««¤¥¬ª
¡¢£
116

!
"#$%&'())*%+,'-*.%/&0.*'+10&2.23+)*4+,50,'64,+,'-+&+7*8,+0+7(+0&29,9'&+ 4*)*,:*('02'*.%/&0.*'+,'324(')*%(0.*'+36,+7,'+7*+6*/:*;<=>.&'+73%4,&4+& +7,3(%%&,'+.*'+5&4%4*:,&234*+,4*9(''2,+('+6&4?6,+7('08(/@ABC*.%/&0*4D

E?'&60&26,//F*(-4*(+(33*++&+7*8,+0,'+7,3%&3,+,&'('9E/&&?5&46(49+&)&'+,'2,'-+& 6&4?6,+70&2D@/*(3*/*+.*?'&6,50&27(:*('0G2*3+,&'34*-(49,'-+7,3/*++*4&4('0 (3%*)+3&5+7,3&55*4&5*.%/&0.*'+D

C,')*4*/01

H537,'I3?&2,1@DAD1@JKL
8,+0M('(-*4

A')/&324*

NONPPPNQ

RSTUVWXUWYZS[U\U]Y^SW_`aab`cdVST^[UeYfgYgVUY^VUU]gWWSYhUgddS^WYU[YSdSeYi VUY^VUXUWYUXdjSkXUWY^lYfUVUY^VUUVU]U^TU[mWUXdjSkXUWY^WemVgW]U]SXdUWegY^SW lSVgWkdV^SVVUY^VU[gWWm^YgWYnSVolSVgWkdmhj^]UXdjSkUV[mV^WpYfUYnUjTUqras XSWYfedV^SVYSYfUgddS^WYXUWY[gYUbtmW[UVeYgW[gW[]UVY^lkYfgYtgX^W]SXdj^gW]U n^YfYf^eVUum^VUXUWYb

vwxyyz{|}~w|||{
yy{|y|{y|~y|||{|{yvy|{~ x
~{y{||{{{|{||y
{|{y||
|{w

\^pWgYmVUgYU

¡¹º»¸º»¢µ®¼¶§½¾¿º¾»»À§¹§ÁÁº»ÂÀ® ¡¢£¤¥£¦¤£§§¤§§¨©¨ª«¬¡®¯ °¦±¥²³´¤µ¶·² ´¸¹ 117

+)&CDE$'B#DE,?8F(@('1G-#<H?IJ?DK<):DE$'G1L'E"GIE'("EDE$'MKNL !"#$%#&'()$*+,-./-0.-11.11232'4567+8)9*:0;/<#=>.?%@A<*>B)C 118

! "#$

%
#
&'()*

$! +,
-! "
#

%
#.

/#- ,#0

1!21,$"3

! "
#0
#

.#!%! ". /% #,
-1 11

#,!#0#
4
1#! "

$! 5
6$0/ /

$# /#0

$$

/! "
%
%
#
#

%
# /#0
1 $
7
1 $ ,
%
%
#5
80!$
+!1#! !$/
$!"
/#0

3!"#
#0$

$ /
0 9:;<=>?@A@B;>@C><9DB<>E9DDAF
G8

%! #!
% #0&'()*

%
#, 1

G)
! $##
%
#
%

%
#
G)

%
#

%
#+

2#$

1 !3
/
G'%
#

#
1#!3

%
#1 #
!+#! $ /! #

$#
GH$$1$#II!3! "! 1

$
$
GH$$"/
0 /$0-
+

2#$
80!$
+!1#! $

3!/
$!
%#! +#,
-! "

&'()*
%

$ ! /

/
#1 #
1#
.1 #
1#

.
#0
"0#0!
/I

#
%

.$10$#
%

"
15J//!#! &'()*
+!1#! $

1 /,!#0!
1 +
+#!
/
,
+$!#
#KKKLM9DB@NALM9LO;:

+1! "$#PPPQ9DRSTUV
PPPIWWXIYZYY[5
fda~_b}^gzsc{cblh^wz
zwdu_blb]bc]_b \]^_`^abcd_efghijhkihllillmnmbopqrfsdteukvjw^xyiz`{|wey}d~ 119

!

"

#
$
%

&

#(
)
*
"

+#,
- .

"

0

12#3

4

/
5
@>;XYZ9<W8YZATM[=U=<F\B8Q]T^_TY`Q>OYZ9<\Fa<Z7\^Z<=7ZYZ9<b`ca 6789:8;<=>9?@ABCDBECBFFCFFGHG<IJKL@M>N?OEPDQ8RSCT:UVQ?SW>X 120

!"#$%

&#&'(#)*&$!++,! #
!&-&+ !# &.-%
/$#
!0

1 !&#$#*!#1#-)! !"
)
*)# )*!#&#$#-&#
$/# 2*.

(*!# #$3$
4516
*.

()07
-))# )*!#$

$!/ &#)* !$#+-!#
(
-)8)# ) !#

-#-)07
-$!+(
-)*.

()$
&
)&-**$' !")# )*!#/
!#) %-#
!&9
$!+(
-$)!&)2 //)+ #0
3$
45161# ):!*.

(

$3$
4516*.

()
#)* !$#&$/# 2*.

(*!#
$!+)/ 2&$*
!#
(3$
4516)# )*!#$

$!/0
1# )+:!!- #$!#:3$
4516)# )
)' !"$&$!$#8

(

)$3$
4516*.

()
#
-#) !&#$# !"
)
*)# )*!#0
)* !$#
!

1# )*!#/$!/

$#
!

(
-)*
!#
()# )*!#$

$!/0
;!
$
-
5*.

(*!#1# )*.

(*!#

-!+#
% !2

$#
!

#)# )*!#
$
$!+)"-
$#
!&0
<
=>

?@
A

:!$
#)!$# 2#
&)2 /)# )*!#$!+
)' !"
$&$)# )+$!!- #$!# &.$)# $
&)2 /)# )*!#0
&%!,# &$2$
$%
#

-

8# *&#$#
* &/

$!
-&9
-

8# *&#$# !+-&#) $
9$!+

8# *.-%
/$"!/(*.

(&
&*.

()
/
!#)$/#&

)# &%!,#04$)# $
&)2 /)# )&$)
!
#&-%B/##
#
)' !"$
#))# )*!#)-
&0
%!,#
)'&# &$(CD #*.

()
$..)
2$
9$!*.

(
*#&#
" %
#(
)E- )*!#&/$!)+-/ &
))
)'# *%(
$#
$&#FG%-#!
#*
)#$!HFG$!+)/ 2
$)# )*!#$

$!/

)#%$
$!/0
I
)*
) !

)*$#
!$%
-#.$)# $
&)2 /
)# )*!#9/
!#$/#(
-)*.

()$!+$&'
#(
/
!#)$/#

)# &%!,#$!+)
)#
JKLMNOPQ
RQLSTUVWXYZWUSPMUVZOS[M\OYOPMSO]O^P_4;`abc0
d=e

fg
h=<iA>ij=k

7 -*$(&)2$&$2

-!#)

)$3$
4516
*.

()$
#)(
-))# )*!#06)2 /$&$%
!$
,+2

-!#) &!
#&-%B/##
)# )+$!!- #$!#
)&#) /#
!&0m
2)9(
-*$(!
#2

-!#)
!$.
& #
!#$# &!
)*$

(/
*.!&$#+9
$!+(
-*$(!
#2

-!#) !
)+)#
$2
+
)# )+$!!- #$!#)&#) /#
!&06)2 /#$# &
!
# !$%
!$,+2

-!#).
& #
!

$2
#
/
*.
( #)# )+$!!- #$!#)&#) /#
!&0
xvsqtpy
uut~zpvqt~totuoqt nopqrpstuvqwxyz{|z}{z~~{~~tx vw}|p{rwv
121

!"#
!$$
%!&$"
%!" '"!(!"' )
)

$"*&!+$+''+,$

$"

% (
!"!-
%./0!(!$
%1

$"

!(''23!+$+''!
4!
5 "6 "
%%-
%./07
(!8
)$
%!&$"9 "(%+) "6
%%#+%%7 $
")

7 $
!' !"'
")
"&%()!

! ")
!:('#!
41 (1&!+1
8-
%./0$$,
'1
2
-!"' )
$
%!&$"1
&!+$
&,4!
5 "6
"
'"!"(!"
,+!
&2;#&!+(
'4!
5 "6 "

#+%%7 $
!' !"9"!"(!"
,+!
&

7 $

!' !"'4 %%,(!$(!"
,+!
& #&!+)!"!
'

#
!$1$

!
!

$"2
; '&!+

'
!"' , % &! "#!
$8
&-
%./0
$
%!&
!#&!+

%
"")

$")
'!1

(1$
%!&
(
"'+,$

$
""'

!"
"#!
$
!"!"&!+
,1
%#23!+

$")

(
","!

%
1
"1)
&
#
&!+
%
')
&
!"

&
!%%4 1
"&-
%./0$
%!&
2 <

=>

?@
3!+4 %%4
"!5"!41!44)A"B"!
$
%

$"
6C #&!+ "")!"4!
5 "6#!

-
%./0$
%!&

#

$"D1 '
6
)
$ "' #&!+4 %%,'+,E(!1,!"
A)
'

!"
F+
$"2G)

%
H%
4
")
-
% #!
"

$"%
4
F+

"6$$,

41! '&!+"6
1
""!
$
%

$"
6!"1 '
!
1

$")
!$
,!"
A)'

!"
"'
8 (,#!
4!
5 "6
#

$"#!

-
%./0$
%!&
2 I!
$
%

$"
6#!
-
%./0
+

!'' '
1
6% ') "&!+

$","A#!
$+%
9
#!
H
$
%9
6JJ#!
1KL
JJ#!
$+%
!

6MK#!
1KL
MK#!
$+%
2N!48
9$
H $+$ "!
$
%'
8 (

$"
6 '"8
6

1
"
MK98"#!
1O2KJL
MJ#!
$+%
2
;#&!+

$"
%%!4
"( ',
')!"$!
1
"
!"#!
$+%
9
6

)%''!#41"1
#!
$+%
4
'

")91!%)',"A#!
$+%

6)
$ "'
&!+
"!
$
%

$"
62;#&!+

&!+"6
1
"
1
6 "1
#!
$+%
!"&!+

$")
9
#

!1BP!"
G )

!" "
8 (0F+
$"C
'( !"!"

6Q2
R!)
$ "&!+
"!
$
%

$"
69
((''
&!+
$&-
%./0
((!+"1
!+61!+
4,' 2
3!+
"!
$
%

$"
6 '% ')!"11!$

623!+(
"
%'!
#
!&!+
-
%./0S""+
%
T$,

$"!
(!"
(-
%./02
R!
8 4&!+
$!'
("S""+
%T$,

$"9%!6 "!&!+
$&-
%./0

((!+"
U?V2

UWU
X

")#)

%%
4'

!8 )'
( A($
%!&$"

'
( !"'#!

'41!
+
"!4!
54 1
"
$
%!&
"1'
$
+,% (

$"'&'$#
!$ 41 (11&
( 8
,"A2
R1'
'
( !"'

""))!

8"1
B)!+,%7)

"6C!#

( 8 "6
$!"1%&
-
%./0

$","A41 %
%'!
( 8 "6

'
%

&#
!$

$
""!

6+%

'
Z$
%!&$"
4 1
-
%./0$
%!&
20
'$
&4!
5 "

)
""+
"
!' !"'!"%&20#
!B0
)
S""+
"0+%'C,6 "" "6!"

6[2\ '
, % &

'+,E(!
)) !"
%
F+
$"'

")
'
( !"'2S%'!
#
!B\ '
, % &0
']
S)) !"
%0F+
$"'
")0'
( !"'C
,6 "" "6!"

6O^2
_`abcdefagc`hfc`ag`eidj
uspnqmvrrq{wmsnq{qlqrlnq klmnompqrsntuvwxywzxw{{x{{|}|q~ustz ymxots
122

!"
#

$
%

!

%

'

'
'

"

'

"
(

)

*% "
+

(

-."
/'

'
''

"0

'

'!

'%
'

'

"
123456785969:;285324268
<;256=87824268>394;285324268?
@A289B6C7D:ACE4FC9G4268

'

%

'

"#

'
'

!

'
'%

"H
'

%
'

"
#

'

$

&
'

I
'

%''

'

"#''

'
%

'"H

'

'

'
%

'"

*

'!

'

%

"

'
%
'
'%
J!

''

)!

'

"
K

%

%
%
LMNOPQ
RSTUVWXYZYQO[\RURQ]Q[R^_S]YQRO_Q]Q[R$
`abc&"
defghijkflhemkheflejnio
zxusvr{wwv|rxsvvqvwqsv pqrstruvwxsyz{|}~|}|}v zxy~r}tyx
123

!"
# $
%&
'()
*+,
*
-,+./0,
+,1/+,,2
'()
0*3
4(+5
&(+
*

6+/.*1,
/37)-1+'
,869(',+
3(1
*--(0/*1,7
4/1:
*3'

;*9<=>?
,869(',+
4/1:()1
+,-1+/01/(3-
*37
0(31/3),

1(
+,0,/.,
'()+
;*9<=>?
+,1/+,8,31
*99(4*30,@
%&
'()
*+,
*
7/-*A/9/1'
+,1/+,,2
1:,+,
*+,
9/8/1*1/(3-

(3
6+/.*1,
-,01(+
,869('8,31@
%&
'()
*+,
*
7/-*A/9/1'

(+
/37)-1+/*9
7/-*A/9/1'
+,1/+,,2
A,
-)+,
1(
+,./,4

1:,
BC/-*A/9/1'
>,1/+,,-
D
E77/1/(3*9
>,F)/+,8,31-

*37
>,-1+/01/(3-G
-,01/(3
A,H/33/3H
(3
6*H,
IJ@
%&
'()
*+,
,/1:,+
*
-,+./0,
+,1/+,,
(+
*
7/-*A/9/1'

+,1/+,,2
*37
'()
4*31
1(
4(+5
&(+
*
6+/.*1,
/37)-1+'

,869(',+
4:(
6+(./7,-
*
-,+./0,
1(
*
;*9<=>?

,869(',+2
+,&,+
1(
1:,
-,01/(3
(3
B%37,6,37,31

;(31+*01(+
=869('8,31G
A,H/33/3H
(3
6*H,
IK@
!"
# $
$
LM
NO"

P $

#Q Q

%&
'()
*+,
*
-,+./0,
+,1/+,,2
'()
0*3
4(+5
4/1:()1

+,-1+/01/(3-
/3
*
6(-/1/(3
1:*1
F)*9/R,-
&(+

8,8A,+-:/6
/3
*3'
(1:,+
7,R3,7
A,3,R1
69*3

6)A9/0
+,1/+,8,31
-'-1,8
4/1:()1
1,+8/3*1/3H

'()+
;*9<=>?
+,1/+,8,31
*37
0(31/3),
1(
+,0,/.,

'()+
;*9<=>?
*99(4*30,@
S:/-
/309)7,-
0,+1/R0*1,7

T1,*0:/3HU
6(-/1/(3-
0(.,+,7
A'
1:,
;*9/&(+3/*

?1*1,
S,*0:,+-V
>,1/+,8,31
?'-1,8
T;*9?S>?U@
%&
'()
*+,
*
7/-*A/9/1'
+,1/+,,2
1:,+,
*+,
+,-1+/01/(3-

(3
4(+5/3H
&(+
*3
,869(',+
/3
*
7/W,+,31
6)A9/0

+,1/+,8,31
-'-1,8@
>,&,+
1(
1:,
-,01/(3
(3

BC/-*A/9/1'
>,1/+,,-
D
E77/1/(3*9
>,F)/+,8,31-

*37
>,-1+/01/(3-G
A,H/33/3H
(3
6*H,
IJ@
X"P
YX"
ZP

"

$
S:,
+,1/+,8,31
-'-1,8
,9,01/(3
1(
,9,01
0(.,+*H,

)37,+
;*9?S>?
&(+
*
;*9<=>?[0(.,+,7
6(-/1/(3
(+

;*9<=>?
&(+
*
;*9?S>?[0(.,+,7
6(-/1/(3
)37,+

\(.,+38,31
;(7,
-,01/(3
K]^]_
(39'
*669/,-

1(
*01/.,
8,8A,+-@
>,1/+,,-
*+,
/3,9/H/A9,
&(+

1:/-
,9,01/(3@
!"
# $
$
`P

b(+
/3&(+8*1/(3
*A()1
,869('8,31
/3
6(-/1/(3-
1:*1

F)*9/&'
&(+
8,8A,+-:/6
/3
1:,
c)7H,-V
>,1/+,8,31

?'-1,8
%%2
0*99
T_IdU
e_[^dff@
g
h$i
j

X"P

!"
#

%&
'()+
6(-1[+,1/+,8,31
69*3-
/309)7,
4(+5/3H

&(+
*
;*9<=>?
,869(',+2
'()
:*.,
1:,-,
(61/(3-k

+,/3-1*1/3H
&+(8
+,1/+,8,312
)37,+
0(31+*01
*-

*3
/37,6,37,31
0(31+*01(+2
(+
+,1/+,7
*33)/1*31

,869('8,31@
C/-*A/9/1'
+,1/+,,-
:*.,
*3(1:,+

(61/(32
4:/0:
/-
1(
4(+5
/3
*
6,+8*3,31
6(-/1/(3

)37,+
\(.,+38,31
;(7,
-,01/(3
KIK^K@
%&
'()
*+,

*
7/-*A/9/1'
(+
/37)-1+/*9
7/-*A/9/1'
+,1/+,,2
1:,+,
*+,

*77/1/(3*9
+,-1+/01/(3-
(3
1:,
4(+5
'()
0*3
7(
4:/9,

+,1/+,7@
>,./,4
1:,
BC/-*A/9/1'
>,1/+,,-
D
E77/1/(3*9

>,F)/+,8,31-
*37
>,-1+/01/(3-G
-,01/(3
A,H/33/3H

(3
6*H,
IJ
&(+
/3&(+8*1/(3
(3
1:*1
(61/(3@
l
"N$#
P$Q $
m

P $
n()
-:()97
(39'
*669'
&(+
*37
*00,61
*
+,H)9*+

-1*W
6(-/1/(3
4/1:
*
;*9<=>?
,869(',+
/&
'()
*+,

.(9)31*+/9'
+,/3-1*1/3H
&+(8
+,1/+,8,312
*37
'()
*37

1:,
,869(',+
:*.,
0(869,1,7
1:,
opqrstutpvprt

wxyv
zpx{q|p
optqxpvprt
}~~q|utqyr
&(+8
(+
1:,

opqrstutpvprt
wxyv
qsuqqtr
stxqu
qsuqqt

optqxpvprt
}~~q|utqyr
&(+8@
b(+
8(+,
/3&(+8*1/(3

*A()1
.(9)31*+'
+,/3-1*1,8,31
&+(8
+,1/+,8,31

/31(
*01/.,
,869('8,312
+,./,4
}
q
p
ty
uoz

opqrstutpvprt
wxyv
optqxpvprt
T<
^eU@
¯°±
®°±
«¤²¬

³
¨´«µ¶
«°·¨¦°±³¸±³µ±±°±¹·º¸

¡¢£¤¥¦§¨©ª«¬¨ª®¯
124

! "#$%&'
()
*+!
)
,
*+()

"!
-)
()
.,
!
!/
*!** !
.!
"!*
((()
-()
!*"!)

"#$%&'()
0&

"* !+1
)
#
%()
( ,/!!/)/230
45
675

8 !
! !*#$%&' !"9*
* -!()

#$%&'()

! " !* ! !* :!
;)
!<!/
"! !( =)*!)
( *>0
& !
8! )*! !*(* ()

!
)( ./!/.
*
*))( #$%&' !*?
)*!. !*
@ ()
:!

*!**

#$%&'()
0
8* !
! .

*:!

! "!*A!

! ! !(
@ *
( "()
( 01

!

(! !

9
#$%&'()
.

*"

))

) !

! )*! !08))! (
)(
/* B)*! !=)
!(.
! (! ."
.**..C()

(!:!*:!.C()
(((*"!). 0>
A!*!* (
( !( 0D"!*
))!* #$%&'((**!@ !*
=(!**.*

.)!.@. 0>0
EFGHIJKHLMKNKOHPNQRFSNKOHTUKOVMLFGWUFOHLOXKYZ
ec`}~^a|]~fyrbzbakg]vyy~
vct~^aka\ab\~^a
[\]^_]`abc^defghigjhgkkhkklmlanopqercsdtjuiv]wxhy_z{vdx|c} 125

!"# $

%&
'(
")&

$
*
+,-./01234567-7586

&

#

9
:;)

<
&
=>>*=?@>A>>B@>A>>@

>A>>C*D
< EFGHI&)
:

J
#
*K)@

'&
!
LM7N7-1OPQR./-758S5.T
U
)V

V

'

'
&%
&W
@X
V@&*(
)
'
: &:

*Y
V

J& @

V

&
*F#

V
V
:&V '@V
&
Z&@

V
#&'

[&

*U
&

:

'
[

&"
@$
"

@$"#&)
)&@$"#:@$"D\@$

"$

*
L]5N3186/-758

&)&

:

#&
#

'&:

^
: & ) :
&

*D @
&

&)
:
J@

&
)@&

:
J@
&

*_# @
')&

@&V
)@)&
:
J&

*`a1582b1,c13-758

:
:
':

Z:I
#
*d
&

'
&

'
Z:I
#
*
LefgP05R.M7N7-

V&

#&
C?h

J& %i
A
'i

jh(

< EFGH &:

*`a1.1/.1
851,c13-7586-5-a7627N7-kU

&i
A@

&
V
C?h

J& *U

< EFGH@;)

<
&
>A>>h*U
I

&
:

< EFGH&&

*
<
H\
)%<H\(&
&
[&
V

&
&[<H\

9
:;)

<
&

=>>*=?

>A>>*K)@

V
<H\ &

#&

C?h

J& =hl

' J&

@&) *
Lm81N325bN18-n86R./8c14/bN18-6
U
&

V

< EFGH
A>

*\
&&
'

@

&

'

& X

*
G)

&

"\

d

&E
$
'C*
ywtruqzvvu{qwruupuvpru opqrsqtuvwrxyz{|}{~|{|u ywx~}q|sxw
126

!"!

!
"
#
!$ %
!
&"
!'#
$(
!)%"

##*+,,-+.,/,,/0$1-2$"
!"
"
#"$3
"##
*&
4$

##$&5
3
"#
5-4"
#&$#
##

!" '
$&'6$&'
%

"$''
7'-
89
:;<;=>
?;
@&!
$'$"
!"
#$%

%
"&
"

"&$%
#-
8A
?
;BCD>=
E =F
G

$!#"

"
$
&
"H
!
5I
"
!&
6
&"-
8J
KL;9MM
?;
G

!$%

#-N&!
"#

"$#
&
'!
"
#
%$
#-N&!

&!

"4
#'$###
#

"5#

5&

"
!"-
8O ?M;

G
$
!
!
##$$
""
"4$"4"
"&$
%
###$"
!P#

!%

!#$
-G

%!
6'%'"
#

&
6#'$&"&"
#
$$
!
!-
QL
K
R
L
S<;T>
=;?;
U =
<;
=;B9>

N$3
"#$
%
#

#'#"
#"
$&$&5
53
"#

5I&

"
!V
WXY Z
B;J;M=

J;=:
;<;T>
=;?;
G

"
!#
&
!
!
$$["" \
!
"'
##
$&$&5
#"V
82$
%
5 "

5I#

5!

!
"
!
&!
-
82$#"&"
!"0#

#%1&.]!#
5!
"
$!
"

"
!"#
5
-
^ =?L=;
=;?;K;#$#
#!
"
6&"
0#1

5
%
#
"
!"-
26$# ' !
"!

?SXLM;=
XXK :-

#5$
""
""
#"$
6#

#%3
"%&4
$
/]!5

#-2$#53
"#
"!
#%
!-2$!4

$.]!5
##&"
!"

$#
6" !##6
)%"
#++-

"
"%4#&!

!

"" -2$#
6#

3
"#
&"5

#"
!5$N%

4
#-
_`abc`deffgbahfa_gi`jklmfabfg`dn
ywtruqzvvu{qwruupuvpru opqrsqtuvwrxyz{|}{~|{|u ywx~}q|sxw
127

!!"#$%!&
'
(!)(!&

)

*(

#!()&*+,-&
%'
*!(%((!)(!"!
&
!
$!''
%.
$)*%*(
!*/!*$$0)
1!2
!#)
'34/!
+,-5&
%0
)#!()& !1)
'
%((!)(!"!
&
!3
6789
:
;<!*(!% !1)
0(=>%(!"#$%!("'

!()*%/!

(!*/!!"#$%"!

&/

/!
##)
"!
)'
!
!''
(%?$$

())

$$%

!!&!&#'))
'
!(/

+,-&
%'34/!

##)
"!
"' !
##(@!& %/!!"#$%!(A'
1@!(
)
1 &%>)

# $)
"!!)
1>

&"'
!
##(@!&
'

)
)!">(
/!(/

$!
&
(3
;0)$$#
()
)#
!)
/!BCDE

$%F
($%
G!)(!"!
H(1(
"IEFGHJ#('

$$!
)@!
(1
)
)
1
1(!!"!
0)/BCD/

!2)'!&#()(K

(%+>L-+M>(/
' !!

)

$&!&)
' '!.!

1(!!"!
'3
;
(!
(!)(!&?(!?1/!(((!)(!&# $)

'
*!%N
!(
'&!?
!&)
O@!(
"!
B&!
'!
)
MM-+I#!

!N
!(J0/0)$$#!(*(" ?(!?1/!((#!

!N
!((!)(!&

)

0(=3
;
(!
B
$C4GC(!)(!!0/)'' P!

'!
)
'LQL+L>LQL+Q3R>(LS,+L*/!
F&

)
B&!3B
$$B
$C4GC
I,--JLL,5RQRM
*("(!)
*("
)
3 T*%(!
!)@!
1$&!
/

&'/
=!(

%/!(
(!)(!"!
('!#
(
)
)

!
)@!>%"'0
)
+,-&
%' !*(!(!(
)
10(=

&%
(!

!$)1) $!*(

%*/!+,-5&
%0
)#!()&!2
!#)
'3
U
69V
W
X
VUX
8
6V
Y
Z
V

G!)(!&

)

!"#$%"!
0)/
'
!

%)'$)")!&(!)(!!'0//
@!
)@)$
'!(@)
!!$)1) )$)%*("#(!@)''
!
1!

%
!"#$%"!
(0/.
$)*%*(
##)
"!

&!(

##$)

$!
)@)$'!(@)
!!"#$%"!
$)'3[)')
/!B
$)*(
)
\!#
("!
*]"

G!'(
!'
IB
$]GJ0! ')!
^^^8
V_8
YX*("(!
)
*("
)
3G!)(!&C
!*B
$)*(
)
!"#$%!!'

##$%*((!)(!&

)

#'))
'@)
/!
<"!(

10! ')!
Z
Y8
YX3
`9V
a:
8

B
$)*(
)
$
0#(/) )'
##)
"!
*
(!)(!&

)

%
B
$HFGC!"#$%!()*>&()
1/!
+L5"
/#!()& !*(!

##)
"!
>%
(!
!)@!&
!"#$%"!
)
'(

!
"#!
'
)

*(#()((!)(!&

)

!"#$%"!
0)/

%
B
$HFGC!"#$%!(3D#

!#)
1!"#$%"!
>
%"'
!()*%)
0())
1/!!"#$%!(
/
%
"#$%0)//)'(!.)(!"!
3 T*%
(!0(=)
1
'
(!)(!&

)

&))'
&)'
@!(!&/
&()
1/!#(!@)'+L"
/'%
0!(!#
)&
!"#$%"!
)
'(

!
"#!
'
)

'!&
#()((!)(!&

)

!"#$%"!
0)/

%B
$HFGC!"#$%!(>%(!"#$%"!
"'
!!(")

!&
/!$
'&
%*/!
((!
#
%
#!()&30)$$
!!$)1) $!*(
##)
"!

'

(!)(!&

)

0)/

%B
$HFGC!"#$%!(*(
+L"
/'*$$0)
1/!!(")

)
&
!*/!

((!
!"#$%"!
3[)$
)
*/)'
!"#$%"!

)
'(

!
"#!
'
)
(!'()
)
&!'
(!'$
)
"

&
(%(!)
'
!"!
*("(!)(!"!
3 bcdefcghiijedkidbjlcmnopideijcgq
|zwuxt}yyx~tzuxxsxysux rstuvtwxyzu{|}~~~x |z{tv{z
128

!"#$
%&
'(# )*#)

+$#
#,
!)
--.

/0 #(!
1&
'(# )*#)

+$#
#,
!)
---/$2

)$
----23

+14567
#
! ##
*&
# (#
!)
)

#1#,
#$

00!)
#$
8,#
9 !1#
#
! #$:
;9#(# 3

!<
11

<
&

#
! #*#)

119),#
!
%#$

)
# (!,#
, #$!

8,#3

#
0 !)
<

#
! #*#)

119),#
%#$
)

# (!,#
, #$!

!

0#)$#$
$
!)=
&

!*#
!)
8,#:
>
#
456?

#@
! #
&

#*01&#

!**#$!
#1&
!)< *
+14567
<

#
00!)
*#)

<
)&
+14567

#
! ##
!)

)
#1#,
!(#

00!)
#$
8,#:
>

)
!<&
+14567

#
#*01&#
*

,*01#
#

ABCDEFGC
HIDCJ

KCEFJCC

LCJEFMDNEFOP
QOJR
)$
#)$

S
T
UVWV
X
YYU
Z

!**#$!
#1&

0)
&

[!)=
8,#:
\
#)
&

1#(#

8,#3
&

119),#
!

)
0#)$#$
0 0#,
!(#1&:

]<
&

#1#,

*#*%#
!0

# )
$$!
!)1

+14567
# (!,#
, #$!

<
&

!*#
!)

#
#1#,
#$

00!)
#$
8,#
)$

8,#
!

%^#,

+14567

*#*%#
!03
&

#!)

#
< *
#
! #*#)
:
)
#1#,
#$

00!)
#$
8,# 3
9
#1#,
#$

*#*%#
!0
<

#!
,
#)

# *3
*&
)

#
! #

*!$_
# *
)$
,)
!)
#

# (#
!)

#
#1#,
#$

00!)
#$
0!
!):
`

#0
#
< *

# (!,#
0 !

#
! !)=:
)
#1#,
#$

00!)
#$

8,#
*&
#0
#
0 !

%#!)=
#_#1#,
#$

#)
%#=!)

#!
)#a

# *
<
#
#
! #*#)
:

;9#(# 3
&

)##$

b)
c!$#
7#0
!)
< *
# (!,#:
c
* #
!)< *
!)
)
b)
c!$#

7#0
!)3
#(!#9

#
#,
!)

!
1#$
db)
c!$#

7#0
!)
!)
7# (!,#
6#@
! #*#)
e
)
0=#
f:
g
g

hijklmnop
qporpj
st
ukikp
vsijw
sj
xsoonyynsz
{

xi|h}~u
~pknjppy
izw
szlxi|h}~u
~pknjppy
`

,)
# (#
9!

#!)

#*#)

< *
#
! #*#)

1 !#$
0
_
!*#
*#*%#
<

#
% $

,**!!)3
9 # #
0

!*#
!
$#)#$

)
00!)
*#)

1 &
<
)
* #

)

3
))
11&3
9 !,

9!11
%#
!), ##$
!)

)&
,1
&#
!)
9 !,

=#)# 1
1 &
!), ##

!
0 (!$#$
<

#
#*01&##:
>
#
*
)

#
!), ##
,))

#a,##$

#
0# ,#)
=#

#
=#)# 1
1 &
!), ##
0 (!$#$
<

#

#*01&##
$
!)=

,1
&# :
`

,@
! #

)
%#)#
3
# (!,#
, #$!
3 #
! #*#)

< *

!
#*01&*#)
:
||lmnop
qporpj
st
ukikp
vsijw
sj
xsoonyynsz
{

xi|h}~u
~pknjppy
`

,)
# (#
9!

#!)

#*#)

< *
#
! #*#)

))_1 !#$
<
11_
!*#
*#*%#

<

#
% $

,**!!):
`

*&
#,#!(#

)1&
0#
$!#*

!"#$

11
*#*%#
<

#
% $

,**!!):
`

$
)

# )
)&

# (!,#
, #$!

%#)#

!)
+14567

*[#

)&
+14567
,)
!%

!):
]<
&

,,#0

1 &3
&

#!)

#
< *
#
! #*#)
:
||lmnop
qporpj
st
ukikp
vsijw
sj
xsoonyynsz
{

szlxi|h}~u
~pknjppy
]<
&

#,#!(#
#
! #*#)

< *

0 %1!,
#
! #*#)

&
#*

)
+145673
&

,)
# (#

))_1 !#$
<
11_
!*#
*#*%#
<

#
% $

,**!!)
)$
,)
!)
#

#,#!(#
&

#
! #*#)

119),#
!)
$$!
!)

)&
0#

$!#*

!"#$

11
*#*%#
<

#
% $

,**!!):
]<
&

,,#0

#
1 &3
&

0#)$
&

#
! #*#)

%#)#

< *

&
#*
)$
#) 11

)#9
*#*%#
<
+14567:

0)
#
! #*#)

#
0#)!)%1#
,*0#)
!)

# )#$
< *

#
# (!,#
)

!
% $

,**!!)

9!11
)

%#
#1!=!%1#
<
#,!0 ,!
&
9!

#
! #*#)

&
#*

01)3
)$
/-2
&

9!11
%#

#)
!
1#$

#
#!)

#*#)

<
)&

0#)$#$

%#)#
3
!),1
$!)=
#*01&# _0 (!$#$
#
! ##

%#)#
3
<
9 !,

9# #
#)
!
1#$

!*#

<
00!)
*#)

#
% $

,**!!):

¸¹º
·¹º¡
´»µ
¦
¼
¢±½´¾¿
´¹À±¯¹º¼¦Áº¼¾ºº¹ºÂÀÃÁ
¡
¢£¤¢¥£¢¦¦£¦¦§¨§©ª«¬ ®¯¥°¤±²³£´µ¶±³·¸
129

!
"#$
%&'
%((#)*+',
%-
%
!$../+)0'
1#00)--)#*'&

#!
+2'
3%.)!#&*)%
4#%&,
#!
5%&#.'
6'%&)*7-
#&
+2'

3%.)!#&*)%
4#%&,
#!
8$9'*).'
6'%&)*7-:
"#$
0%"

-'&9'
;)+2#$+
&')*-+%+'0'*+
!&#0
&'+)&'0'*+:

%*,
;)+2#$+
.#--
#&
)*+'&&$(+)#*
#!
<'*'=+-

(&#9),',
<"
+2'
&'+)&'0'*+
-"-+'0>
?2'-'

%((#)*+0'*+-
%&'
0%,'
<"
+2'
@#9'&*#&
%*,

&'A$)&'
1#*=&0%+)#*
<"
+2'
3%.)!#&*)%
B'*%+'>

CDEFGDH

IJJKFELJE
CKMDN

OPQJEFJKDHR
][XuvwVY
tUvw^
qjxZrZY
c
y
_Unzq{|
qv}n[lvwVYyc~YwTy{wYZTwvwVY}~ STUVWUXYZ[V
\]^
_`a_b`_cc`ccdedYfghi]j[k\lbmanUop`qWrsn\pt[u
130

!
"#$%&

' ( )*! !+ +'+', ' (
)

+-*'!. '+

'/, *!*0

'
(*(( +*+
/
*+-+ '(+'*+*( *
+-'
*(

'.
'+*(-*
+

! +- "#$%&
'1
2

'.
'+*(-*
3*(+(/ +-
+ *( (4+ + +- '+*'!
*++ '(+'*+*( 5 *
+-
+
0'+ *( +
' *! !+
+'+'1 2
+-
'6

* '
' *( +-
( ' (**' +
'6
'
'! (
+*5
' *(
'6 '
'!
+*5

+-+
'/
'.

'+*(-* 3*(+( ! +-
+ *( (4+
+ +- '+*'! *++ '(+'*+*(1
2
'6 ( *! !+ +'+' !
' +' !+'*! +
! +-+

+ 5*+(

+- '+*'! *++
'(+'*+*(/
' '+*'+
* (4+ +
'*(+++1 %
' + )7'*+*
%+*'+
8%*(+++ 9' %+*'+: ; + <

$
+, 0 =
' !+*(1
2 ' *0 +
'6 ( *! !+
+'+' ! +- ('5* *( !+'*! +

+
*+- "#$%&
'/
'
('5*
* ! + !-' + (+.'+*'+

+ '>*'+(
'
0*
+-+ ('5*1
?@ABCB@AB@D EF@DGHIDFG FG
JKLGAMNHGDO PQCRFOBB
2! !+ +'+'( ' + )
(,
! ' 3!!
' '(-* * "#$%&

S5'+ "! (+* TUTT8:1 V +'
*! !+ +'+' *( (
- +'+(
+ '5*! ('5* ' + +(6 ! *( +
(4+ + +- "#$%&.5'! +*+
W( +'
( + +- ' ! (

-*- +-
'6 *(
'
'!/
+ +
+- ! '!+1
X
+/ + +

(/ +-*'!. '+

( '
(*!'!
(
+- "#$%&.5'!
+*+
/ *0 '+*'( ' (+* (4+ + +-
(+.'+*'+
+ '(+'*+*( *!+*Y!
* +-*( *+*1
Z ( +- )
+' +(+, ( 0*! +
!+'**0 *! !+ +'+' (++(1 [

+'( ' (*!'!/ *!*0 +- ' !
(

-*- +-
'6 *( *(-!1 Z

* '>(+ ! ( '5+ *
'+* +-+
'5*!( 5*!
+- !0'
+'
+-

'6 *0 '
'! + 6 !+'*+*1
7-
+' +(+ *( 0*!
+ !+'*
-+-'
'6' (-!
((*Y! (
'
*! !+ +'+'1
+ -*'! ( *! !+ +'+'
' (

+-*'!. '+

'
'
(*+* (+*(-!
(+++/ *+
-'+'/
' ** !1 $3 (
+-( (*+*(
' *+
0'/ * -*
/ Y' -*
/ +1
fda~_b }^g zsc{cb l h^wz
zwdu_blb]bc]_b \]^_`^abcd_ efg hijhkihllillmnmbopqrfsdteukvjw^xyiz`{|wey}d~ 131

!! ! ! "" !!#
$ "

%! !
""
!! &
'
()*+
%&
% !
",

-
.&
$

!/ 0!$

! "" 0!"
#
, "

%

!
#
!
# &1
!!" %
$- 2 $!

0!$ , "" $!,!
34
-
5 67
)

8"" 9
:!0!!
(-;- <1 =>?@4=
+"
# '8 =>??=A?@4=
B
67 $/! C&C!
D"
-"- 0
E
F7 G=3H @=IA>33
JKLMNMKLMKO PQKORSTOQR UVNWQXVMKO YTQKOZK[ML\
geb`c ~_h {td|dc m i_x{
{xev`cmc^
cd^`c ]^_`a_bcde` fgh ijkiljimmjmmnoncpqrsgteufvlwkx_yzj{a|}xfz~e 132

!
"#$ %

'
(#& "

( "
(
%

"
)

'
*( +

#"
*! ",

"
&

#"
(
&

"
&

-
(

( "
(

"#$ %

'
.
&&
/
!

&
&
!

( 0#
( )
"

( "
(
%

"1
23 456
789
7
"
&

-
(

( :
;
<56
=74
>58?
358
7 @7ABCDEFG5H989I
9=JA5498
KL

7 89MK89I
7LL6KM7LM
G5=JAK7LM
J5NKMK5L
7LI
G5LMKL69

M5
89G9KH9
4568
@7ABCDE
89MK89=9LM
7AA5>7LG9
K3
MO9

J5NKMK5L
KN
L5M
MO9
N7=9
J5NKMK5L
385=
>OKGO
456

89MK89I
L58
KLGA6I9N
I6MK9N
58 7GMKHKMK9N
456
>989

89NM8KGM9I
385=
J98358=KLP
7M
MO9
MK=9
53 4568

IKN7QKAKM4
89MK89=9LM
J98
R5H98L=9LM
@5I9
N9GMK5L

SSTTU
<56
>KAA
Q9
N6QV9GM
M5
MO9
WXYFO568
AK=KMU
;
<56
=74
>58?
358
7 @7ABCDEFG5H989I
9=JA5498
KL

7 J98=7L9LM
J5NKMK5L
>KMO
@7ABCDEZ
>8KMM9L

J89F7JJ85H7A
7LI
G5LMKL69
M5
89G9KH9
4568
@7ABCDE

89MK89=9LM
7AA5>7LG9
J98
R5H98L=9LM
@5I9

N9GMK5L
SSTSU
<56
>KAA
Q9
N6QV9GM
M5
7L
978LKLPN

AK=KM
K3
7JJ85H9IU
D9398
M5
[\58?KLP
358
7 @7ABCDE

C=JA5498
KL
7 B98=7L9LM
@7J7GKM4
]3M98
^KN7QKAKM4

D9MK89=9LM_
5L
J7P9
`
358
89a6K89=9LMNU
;
<56
=74
>58?
358
7 L5LF@7ABCDE
G5H989I
9=JA5498

7LI
G5LMKL69
M5
89G9KH9
4568
@7ABCDE
89MK89=9LM

7AA5>7LG9
N6QV9GM
M5
7JJAKG7QA9
AK=KM7MK5LNU

;
23 456
789
6LI98
MO9
=KLK=6=
N98HKG9
89MK89=9LM

7P9
b`Yc
`Sc
58 ``d
7LI
>58?
358
7 L5LF@7ABCDEF
G5H989I
9=JA5498c
4568
89MK89=9LM
Q9L9eM
>KAA

Q9
N6QV9GM
M5
7L
978LKLPN
AK=KM
6LI98
R5H98L=9LM

@5I9
N9GMK5L
STSU
f<
56 789
89a6K89I
M5
89J58M
4568
P85NN

978LKLPN
M5
@7ABCDE
7LL67AA4U
fg
O9
M5M7A
9=JA5498FJ7KI
J58MK5L
53 4568

=5LMOA4
89MK89=9LM
7AA5>7LG9
7LI
4568
L9>

P85NN
978LKLPN
G7LL5M
Q9
P897M98
MO7L
MO9

G6889LM
G5=J9LN7MK5L
53 MO9
J5NKMK5L
385=
>OKGO
456
89MK89IU
23 MO9
M5M7A
KN
P897M98c
4568

89MK89=9LM
7AA5>7LG9
>KAA
Q9
89I6G9IU
fhL
G9
456
897GO
4568
=KLK=6=
N98HKG9

89MK89=9LM
7P9c
4568
9=JA54=9LM
KN
L5
A5LP98

N6QV9GM
M5
7L
978LKLPN
AK=KM
bR5H98L=9LM
@5I9

N9GMK5L
STSdU
@7AA
6N
M5AA
3899
7M
iii
j&klmn

b58
iiiFSS`FoTood
M5
89a69NM
7 pqrstquqvw

xyvqzyy{r
xy|}zv
}~
szqr
358=U ;
23 456
789
6LI98
MO9
=KLK=6=
N98HKG9
89MK89=9LM

7P9
7LI
789
J98358=KLP
I6MK9N
NK=KA78
M5
MO5N9

385=
>OKGO
456
>989
J89HK56NA4
356LI
IKN7QA9Ic

@7ABCDE
G7L
899H7A67M9
4568
=9IKG7A
G5LIKMK5L

M5
I9M98=KL9
>O9MO98
456
NO56AI
Q9
89KLNM7M9I

385=
89MK89=9LMU
D9398
M5
[g98=KL7MK5L
53 D9MK89=9LM
bD9KLNM7M9=9LM
85=
D9MK89=9LMd

^69
M5
LA7>36A
C=JA54=9LM_
5L
J7P9

358
I9M7KANU
;
<568
IKN7QKAKM4
89MK89=9LM
89a6K89N
456
M5
KL358=
@7ABCDE
K==9IK7M9A4
K3
456
789
L5
A5LP98

KLG7J7GKM7M9Ic
58 K3
4568
G6889LM
9=JA54=9LM

KN
KL
7 J5NKMK5L
NK=KA78
M5
MO9
5L9
385=
>OKGO

!"#$%&'

(

)

(

*+
+&
) *
+),*+*

(&
+*

+

&
*'

!"#$

&
*+-

),*+*
*,
++-
,

),*+*

-*&-

(

*
& (
,(+*
,
&+*'*+*
,

,+
*&+
(

)

*
. ++-
+*

(*, /* *+

+(
,
&+*

11223
* /
,/4
&+++-
567%-
*
*+3

!"#$%&'

(

)

*
)

+),*+*

*+- !"#$8

*++

)

% ))
'
(&
+*

+

&
*'

!"#$

&
)

+(

,
&+*
11213
* /
,/4
&++

*
.,
*
*+* ))
'
(3#

+9:

*
.
!"#$
"
)

*
!

+ ) &*+;+

<*, /* *+
#
+*

+,3

% !"#$&'

(

)

(&
+*

+

&
*'

!"#$

&
,/4
&++ )) *& /
*
*+ +*
,3

?+*,
+,/4
&++

*
., *
*+*

% !"#$%
&'

(

)

+(
,
&+*

1@21A
'

(

+-

*
*

,

'*&

+ .
3

(

+-

*
*

,

'*&

+
.

(

)

*
.(+*
,,*
*
++-,

-*&-

)

'*,
((*, /
(A
!"#$&

' +

(*& &
(*+*
+
(
+

-
+-

,- (/

*
,+ +
(

+3#

+9B

*
+*
#
+*

+
C#
*
,+ +

+D

#
+*

+E<
+F

"
)

+=
) .
@
(
+ * ,3

(*, /* *+

,+*

!"#$*

(* +
*

*
& ) &*+ +
(A
*
&

)

+*,*

),*+*
,*
*
++-

-*&-

(3
GHI
JKHLMNOPNQRH

MQLRS
TK
U

O
Q
F
(

+(
,
&+*
1121A(*, /* *+

*
(,+
* (*, /* *+

,
,

)

+
-*

&
*'*
.

?+,

*+- !"#$8

*++

)

% ))
' 3V

A
&

+ *

,+
*&+*
, )) 3

4/(+*
,
,+(*W

,*.
*?&
+

+-,

(*
+-
),*+*

-*&-

(3B-

),*+*
,- (
+/
+-
,

),*+*

-*&-

(
*
+-
,

& ,,*?& +*
A
(
+-
),*+*
,- (
+*
& (
(+*
,
&+*'*+*
,

,+
*&+
(

)

*
. ++-
+*

))
'
(+

A
*
/

)
+

*
.,+ !"#$
(

&

* /
,/4
&++

*
., *
*+3
B/

*.*/

)

+A
,+?
,+

+
+-

*
.

+,C

+,)
&*?&,
&+*
,
*
+-*,)/ *& +*
EX
B-
/
?(
,
)
+*

+A
* )) *& /
3 B-
Y7%(
*+)

+

/

Z&
)+*
3 [

&
*)+

)

+*
,

&
)

+,

)

'*,

(

*+
+

)

+

1

+-,/

+-
))*
+

+3
$+ +
"
)

*'* $

'*&
" *.*/* *+

)

+
*+- ,+ +
.

)

3 \]^_`]a]bcdeb]fee^ghii]b]jk_adelm]fenekb^_kide^bf]ob]jk^pojkb]kmeiq |zwuxt}yyx~tzuxxsxysux rstuvtwxyzu{|}~~~x |z{tv{z
134

!
"#$%
&#'()*+,
-./!!%0
#11.
$#'
2%3
.%

2%4/00/04
%1'
5%0!6
7 .%8
% !
#11.
$#'
!

-
.9

3 .
#
&#'()*+
%1'
5%.
/0
#05
.%4
'#.
!#:
1 /!/
0 /0;'
</04
1%.#0%0!
1#.!=!/%>
3 ''=!/%>
%#
0#'

!#!%
'//!%<=!%.
1 /!/
0 >
-"/'%
.%;%/$/04
</ #2/'/!5

.
/0<
!./#'
</ #2/'/!5
2%0%?! >
5 !

2/!

!"%
3 ''
-/04
.%8
/.%<
<
;
%0!
!

&#'()*+@
A

BCDECFG
GH
IHJK
ILMNC

BCOCMPMQR

SMFTUMNMGVW

XQYEFGJMTN

SMFTUMNMGV

BCGMJCZCQG
[CQC\GF
3 .
]

;
1'%!%
#0<
/40
+%;!/
0 6
]

1. 1%;!/$%
%1'
5%.

;
1'%!%
#0<
/40
+%;!/
0 ^6
A
_LVFMOTN

BCDEMJCZCQGF
H`
_HFMGMHQW
aOOEbTGMHQTN
cMGNC
3 .
]

#0<
5 .

1. 1%;!/$%
%1'
5%.

;
1'%!%
#''
%;!/
0 #0<
/40
d
/0!'56
A
e
f

g

f
h

]7
"%
1 /!/
0 <
!5
!#!%%0!

1. $/<%<

25 5

1. 1%;!/$%
%1'
5%.

<% ;./2%
!"%
1%.#0%0!
1 /!/
0 /0
-"/;"
5 -/ "
!

-
.96
A
g

h

ifj
]

!
;"%<
'%
#0
#11
/0!%0!
-/!"

#
1%;/#'/ !
3 .
!"%
</ #2'/04
;
0</!/
0k l

!"#!

1.%;'
<%<
5 3.

-
.9/04>
#0<

5 !

1. $/<%
!"%
1%;/#'/ !
-/!"
#

;
15 3
!"%
1 /!/
0 <
!5
!#!%%0!
#0<

!"%
;
1'%!%<
_LVFMOTN

BCDEMJCZCQGF

H`
_HFMGMHQWaOOEbTGMHQTN
cMGNC
3 .6
mnopqnrnst
uvsnwvvo
x
yzznsn{|pr
uv}~nwvv|so
p|z
uvoswnsn{|o
{|sn|~vz
](
.
$/<%
!

&#'()*+
#
;
..%0!
%</;#'
.%1
.!

3. !"#!
1%;/#'/ !6
3
5 "#<

.%
!"#0

</ #2'/04
;
0</!/
0 #!
!"%
!/%

3 .%!/.%%0!>

5 !

1. $/<%
#
%</;#'
.%1
.!

0 #11.

1./#!%
'%!!%."%#<

3. %#;"
%</;#'

1%;/#'/ !6
7"%
1%;/#'/ !k l

!
/0;'
<%
!"%

3 ''
-/04
1%.!/0%0!
/03
.#!/
0 /0
!"%/.

%</;#'
.%1
.!@
A

.
0#%
#0<
!"%
<#!%

3 !"%

.%;%0!
%#/0#!/
06 A

.
;
..%0!
%</;#'
</#40
/ 6
A
&
0?.#!/
0 !"#!
!"%
1%;/#'/ !
.%$/%-%<

#0<
</ ;
%<
-/!"
5 !"%
1 /!/
0 <
!5

!#!%%0!
k25
!/!'%l
#0<
!"%
_LVFMOTN

BCDEMJCZCQGF
H`
_HFMGMHQWaOOEbTGMHQTN

cMGNC
3 .6 A

!#!%%0!
#
!

-"%!"%.
5 #.%

1.% %0!'5

;#1#2'%

3 1%.3
./04
#''
!# 9
/0$
'$%<
/0

5 .
0%-
1 /!/
0 -/!"

.
-/!"

!
.% !./;!/
0 .
'//!#!/
0 6
A
3
!"%.%
#.%
.% !./;!/
0 .
'//!#!/
0 >
/0;'
<%

1%;/?;
<%!#/'
#2

!
!"%
.% !./;!/
0 3
.
!"%

0%-
1 /!/
06 A
+1%;/#'/ !,
/40#!
.%>

1./0!%<
0#%>

%</;#'
1%;/#'!5>
#0<
;
0!#;!
/03
.#!/
06 A

h
g

g
f

h
fh

f
]
3 5

#.%
#
'
;#'
#3%!5
</ #2/'/!5

.
'
;#'

#3%!5
/0<
!./#'
</ #2/'/!5
.%!/.%%>
5 !

2/!
!"%
%</;#'
<
;
%0!#!/
0 %<
#!
!"%
!/%

3 5

.
.%!/.%%0!
/<%0!/35/04

!"%
.% !./;!/
0 1'#;%<

1 0
5 6

2/!
#
1 /!/
0 <
!5
!#!%%0!

<% ;./2/04
!"%
1 /!/
0 5

"%'<
-"%0

5 2%;#%
</ #2'%<6
A
_LVFMOMTQF
BCbHJG
HQ

SMFTUMNMGV
3 .
/
0 !
.%8
/.%<6

''
!"%
3 .
#.%
#$#/'#2'%

0 .
-%2 /!%

!"#
$
%&'()
$*&
+&$&
,()
$()
-
.&//0

1*(.*
.
)
$
2&

--
3(,
$&4
$*
&&
,)$*/
$

.,-&$&0
45
,5/$
/5%,($

&65(
&+
+.5,&)$/

1($*
45

&65&/$
7
,8
9*&
&

&
$(,&/
1*&)

1&
,
4 &65(
&

++($()

()7
,
$()

)

()+&-&)+&)$
,&+(.

&3
,()
$()
$
/5--&,&)$

,&+(.

/-&.(
(/$:/

&-
$8
;7
/0
1&
1(

/&&.$
$*&
,&+(.

/-&.(
(/$0
/.*&+5&
$*&

--()$,&)$0

)+
-
4 7

$*&
&3
,()
$()8
<
-&
,
)&)$
&,-4,&)$
5)+&

=>&
),&)$

+&
/&.$()
??@?

&65(
&/

!"#:
1 ($$&)

--
>

-
(

$
&,-4,&)$A
$*&
&

&
)
&3.&-$()/8

;7
45
>(
$&
$*(/

10 45

)+
45

&,-4&

1(
%&

&/-)/(%&
7

$*&
5)
175

&,-4,&)$8
9*(/
.5+

&/5$
()
45

,
)+
$
4 &()/$
$&,&)$
7 ,

&$(
&,&)$

()$
$*&
.5

&)$
-/($()0
1*&$*&

$*&
-&
,
)&)$
-/($()
(/
-

$
$(,&

75 $(,&8
"&7&

$
B9&
,()
$()
7
"&$(
&,&)$

C"&()/$
$&,&)$

,
"&$(
&,&)$D
E5&
$

F)
175
!,-4,&)$G
)
-
'&
H
7

+&$
(/8
IJKL

MNNOPQLR
SJRLO

TPQLOJULJV

WPRL

XLKVYPJ
Z[Z\Z
"&$(
&&/

--
>&+
$
1
2 5)+&

=>&
),&)$

+&
/&.$()
??@?
+
)$

..
5&
/&
>(.&
.
&+($

$*&
1(/&

.65(
&

&$(
&,&)$

('*$/
7

&,-4,&)$

&$(
&&8
]5
1(
%&
()7
,&+
7
$*&

,5)$
7
45

)()'/

(,($

)+
*1
$

&-
$
45

)()'/8
9*&
$$

&,-4&
^-
(+
-
$()
7
45

,)$*4

&$(
&,&)$

%&)&_$

)+
45

)&1
&

)()'/
.
))$
%&
'
&
$&

$*
)
$*&
.5

&)$
.,-&)/
$()
7
$*&
-/($()
7 ,
1*(.*
45

&$(
&+8
;7
($
(/
'
&
$&
0 45

&$(
&,&)$

%&)&_$
1(
%&

&+5.&+8
9*&
&

)()'/
(,($
$()

.)$()5&/

/
)'

/
45

&
&,-4&+
()
$*&

--
>&+
-/($()A
($
+&/
)$
&)+
1*&)
45

&
.*
45

/&
>(.&

&$(
&,&)$

'&8
;7
45
1(/*
$
.*
)'&
$

+(`&
&)$
&,-4&
0 .*
)'&
a%
.
$()0
.*
)'&
$

+(`&
&)$
a%

C+&,$()0

&.
//(_.
$()0

)/7&
0 -
,$()0
&$.8D0

&/$

$
&,-4,&)$
()

-
&>(5/4

--
>&+
-/($()0
45
,5/$

&
--4
$

!"#

1 ($
5

1 ($$&)

--
>

%&7
&
%&'())()'
&,-4,&)$8

;7
45
+
)$

&.&(>&
-
(

1 ($$&)

--
>
0 45
1(
%&
.)/(+&
&+
5)
1754
&,-4&+

)+
/5%a&.$
$

&()/$
$&,&)$
C(8&80

$&
,()
$()
7

&$(
&,&)$D8
9*&
&

&
)

&3.&-$()/
$
$*(/

&65(
&,&)$8
]5
.
))$
%&
.).5

&)$4
&,-4&+
()

)4
$*&

-/($()/
C
&$(
&+

))5($
)$0
$*&

$&,-

4 -/($()0

)$*&

-&
,
)&)$
-/($()D
1($*
$*&

&,-4&

--
>&+
$
1
2 7

)4
$*&

!"#^.>&
&+
&,-4&
C/D8
;7
45

&
75)+
()

>(
$()
7
$*(/

&65(
&,&)$
45
1(
%&
/5%a&.$

$
,
)+
$
4 &()/$
$&,&)$
7 ,

&$(
&,&)$
()$

$*&

--
>&+
-/($()8
"&7&

$
B9&
,()
$()
7

"&$(
&,&)$
C"&()/$
$&,&)$

,
"&$(
&,&)$D

E5&
$
F)
175
!,-4,&)$G
)
-
'&
H
7

+&$
(/8
ljg
eh
d
m
yiih
r

nd}

}j{
ehrhchic
eh bcdefdghije
klm
nopnqonrrorrstshuvwxlyjzk{q|p}d~of}kj
136

!"#$"%&'()&'#%!$!*(+"$,
+'%+-#.%!(&!/".0"0!#(+12&'300"0+&
*$,"00&'#4'%0.-"(.&$+"$,5&#/+1
67

&8.$(&"--!++)&'#"--&'$(
.$5&#/"(.&$&#+!$,'+"
+!-'#!/!++"8!1

9(")'4(&,"(!&$:"0;<=9$!>+
(?"(/"((!#+(&)&'1
@
A'#&B-!+"#!&4!$C&$,")(?#&'8?D#.,")E
FGG"1/1(&HFGG41/1I!3#!-0&+!,&$+("(!?&0.,")+1
J&005#!!FKKK@LMNOP&#KKKQRRHQSTSSU
JJ2FPSSURVWQSVVR
D"XFPGGUWHWQYHVH
Z$(!#$"(.&$"0:"00+F[WYQSWHQTGGG
\]^M_
`
;"#"+!#a.-.&!$!+4"b&0/"#c'!F
KKK@LMNOP&KKKQRRHQSTSSU
Md
@LMNO
ef

g
fO
h
:&$$!-(>.(?'+(&8!((?!0"(!+(
:"0;<=9$!>+1
i
jj

@k

Lg^M6
7lNj
6jO7j6
</40&)!#m--&'$(C"$"8!/!$(n.a.+.&$
;1A1o&XWVRSGW
9"-#"/!$(&E:mWVRRWQRSGW
zxusvr{wwv|rxsvvqvwqsv pqrstruvwxsyz{|}~|}|}v zxy~r}tyx
137

!
" "#

$ %

&

!

'

(

)

+
*
!* (#

,

"
*

#

'

-
*

+

# -

/0102 3456 7896812 :9;<=>? >8@04A9; BCD8

EF GF HHHIJKLMNOPIJKIQRSTONQURVKLRWJNP
GF XYZ[\ ]F^ GF _Z`Y Z\ ZaaFb\G_Y\G Z\c
a[YaZ[Y dF[ eFf[ gbhbGi
jklmknopqr soturpkv wxxulo
yb\zFX\ {XZ|Z }ZhG
~ G[YYG
yb\zFX\ {XZ|Z }ZhG fbGY
Zz[Z_Y\GF

jkp ompkmupr soturpkv wxxulo
}ZhG FhabGZXbGe yZ\Y fbGY
Z\ Y[\Z[cb\F
~
kvpq moo soturpkv wxxulo
{Zzbz {XZ|Z
~ [YZG Xgci fbGY
ZX\fG
[YY`
~
jkp ro soturpkv wxxulo
YG[F [bgY fbGY
Z\ FhY

mopr soturpkv wxxulo
bgY[ {Z[` {XZzY }ZhG fbGY
[Yh\F

vopkvo soturpkv wxxulo
EXY\cZXY {XZ|Z
F[G]
Y\G[ZX gYi fbGY ~
EXY\cZXY

wmkpto soturpkv wxxulo F[G] GZGY
FXXY Y Xgci fbGY
¡[Z\ Y

jkp ¢uotr soturpkv wxxulo
Z|Z[c
Y\GY[ [bgY fbGY
Z\ bY F

«¨ÅÆÇ¦© Ä¥ÆÇ® ÁºÈªÂª© ³ É ¯¥¾ÊÁËÌ ÁÆÍ¾«¼ÆÇ¦©É³Î©Ç¤ÉËÇ©ª¤ÇÆÇ¦©ÏÍÐÎ £¤¥¦§¥¨©ª«¦ ¬® ¯°±¯²°¯³³°³³´µ´©¶·¸¹º«»¬¼²½±¾¥¿À°Á§ÂÃ¾¬ÀÄ«Å 138

!
"#$%&

'
(

))

'

*

"
+

,-..

)

/)

"
+

,-.0&
12345678942
:;5<4=>

? )

)

!)
A

BCCCC

?&D

)
'

)

)
!
"#$%
F)

+)

)

)

" E

#

G
$

H'I

%

%
+I

)J

" E

#

G
K)

)

!
+I

E&
% E

? )

)&
/

E

? )

!
"#$%
E
(

()
(

&

"

)

)

? )&
M4N97O
M>N;598P
Q;6R>5=
%

)

E&
*

!
"#$%G

?

)

%

)

)&
*

%

E

)
E

))I
)

&
S

%

E

(

)

I
'

E

(E

E

'

E

)

'
(
T
,&
#

)

B&
"

))
J

E

U&
F

(

(
(

J

0&
$

!
"#$%

)

(

V&
!)

E

(

W&
$

(

E

I

I

(

'

12345678942
X9=NO4=;5>
"

E

)

(

A

DI

I

)

I
E

)

'

()
(

)

&
Y4;5
Z9[\8=
]

(

'

)
E
!
"#$%&
/
?

E

"
"
I

(I

'
T
!
"#$%
!
"#$%
"
^
0CC
_
%
%

I
!+
-V`,,
]

aaa
b7O:cZM
A
aaadBBVd.U..D&
!
"#$%

(
)
E

" E

#

G
$

H'

)

+

$

!)I
(
)

$

H'&

(

&

$

H'

e

)
Ef

(&
*

E'

'

)

E

I

)

'

E
E)

'

)

E

&
*

')
E

(

)
I

g

'

?

)
()
(

)

!
"#$%
"
^

0CC
_
%I
%

I
!+
-V`,,&
rpmkn
js
oon
x

tj
pknxninoikn hijkljmnopk
qrs
tuvtwutxxuxxyzyn{|}~rpqwvj
ulq
p
139

456356
0)71"8
-90:;05<-+568"=68:6656><?=

!
""""#$#%&'(
)*+!, -./012-/34
140

! "#$ %&'(
)*
)+
,
#- .)/01#
,0) %&&%2&'(
333
4#
3332&&52'6''7
8889
9
9:;
<=> ??
@#A
+B

CDCEFGGFG
RPMjklKN iJklS f_mOgON X n TJcofpq fkrcPaklKNnXsNlInplNOIlklKNtrus HIJKLJMNOPK QRS TUVTWUTXXUXXYZYN[\]^R_P`QaWbVcJdeUfLghcQeiPj 141

!

"#$%
&
'&#

(
')
*+,-

#$# ./+01*-2,345'
6*47

8-'
+)

)

!

"#$%
96
:;:(*<

''/""9"/
+)

='>
?'
'
!

"#$%= '#

9@
:;:(
='>
?'
'
!

"#$%>'#
> '=
'

'
'')
)2>
=

/
:;:(*<

''"@"A9"A/
+)

'#

='>
?'
'
!

"#$%
&#

+/
:;:((&
)' $ *<

''"@"A9"A/
+)

" !#")%= '#

//
:;:( 5$2

" !#")% @99@
:;:(*<

''A/"9"6"/

" !#")%>'#
> '=
'

'
'')
)2>
=

@996
:;:(*<

''A/"9"6"/
+)

'#

" !#")% &#

+@996
:;:((&
)' $ *<

''A/"9"6"/

#
)
"
@996
:;:(
142

Belmont City CouncilJanuary 27, 2026

Belmont City Council
January 27, 2026