Agenda packet — Berkeley City Council, November 21, 2023 (part 3 of 4)

Page 291 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
2 / 52

3.9. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated

3.11. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated

3.13. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated

3.15. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated

3.17. Paving (2027) - Unmitigated

3.19. Architectural Coating (2027) - Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

Page 184 of 277 ends

Page 292 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
3 / 52

4.5.2. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment T ype

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment T ype

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment T ype

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation T ype

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation T ype - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use T ype - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

Page 185 of 277 ends

Page 293 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
4 / 52

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

Page 186 of 277 ends

Page 294 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
5 / 52

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

Page 187 of 277 ends

Page 295 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
6 / 52

5.18.1. Biomass Cover T ype

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data

Page 188 of 277 ends

Page 296 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
7 / 52

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Southside Addendum
Construction Start Date 7/3/2023
Operational Y ear 2031
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Plan/community
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.90
Precipitation (days) 44.2
Location Southside, Berkeley , CA, USA
County Alameda
City Berkeley
Air District Bay Area AQMD
Air Basin San Francisco Bay Area
T AZ 1525
EDFZ 1
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.14

1.2. Land Use T ypes
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description

Page 189 of 277 ends

Page 297 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
8 / 52
Apartments Mid Rise 1,652 Dwelling Unit 43.5 1,585,920 0.00 0.00 4,130 —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 6.48 362 39.8 65.1 0.06 1.81 19.8 21.6 1.66 10.1 11.8 — 17,682 17,682 0.50 1.12 57.5 18,087 Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 6.01 362 39.8 59.3 0.06 1.81 19.8 21.6 1.66 10.1 11.8 — 16,924 16,924 0.55 1.15 1.49 17,282 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 4.13 54.6 16.1 39.4 0.04 0.52 7.69 8.08 0.48 1.92 2.36 — 11,944 11,944 0.37 0.80 16.5 12,208 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.75 9.96 2.94 7.19 0.01 0.10 1.40 1.47 0.09 0.35 0.43 — 1,978 1,978 0.06 0.13 2.74 2,021

2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Y ear TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e

Page 190 of 277 ends

Page 298 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
9 / 52
——————————————————Daily -
Summer
(Max)
2023 4.77 4.01 39.8 36.3 0.05 1.81 19.8 21.6 1.66 10.1 11.8 — 5,453 5,453 0.22 0.05 0.72 5,474 2024 6.48 5.61 20.2 65.1 0.06 0.56 11.1 11.6 0.52 2.65 3.17 — 17,682 17,682 0.50 1.12 57.5 18,087 2025 5.85 5.32 18.8 61.3 0.06 0.50 11.1 11.6 0.46 2.65 3.11 — 17,402 17,402 0.47 1.09 53.5 17,792 2026 5.57 4.78 17.9 58.5 0.06 0.44 11.1 11.5 0.41 2.65 3.06 — 17,126 17,126 0.47 1.09 49.3 17,512 2027 0.89 362 1.27 9.16 < 0.005 0.02 1.97 1.99 0.02 0.46 0.48 — 2,117 2,117 0.04 0.08 6.72 2,148 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 4.77 4.01 39.8 36.2 0.06 1.81 19.8 21.6 1.66 10.1 11.8 — 6,765 6,765 0.27 0.06 0.02 6,790 2024 6.01 5.42 34.4 59.3 0.06 1.45 11.1 11.6 1.33 3.69 5.02 — 16,924 16,924 0.55 1.15 1.49 17,282 2025 5.71 5.16 20.2 56.1 0.06 0.50 11.1 11.6 0.46 2.65 3.11 — 16,660 16,660 0.55 1.12 1.39 17,007 2026 5.45 4.64 19.0 53.3 0.06 0.44 11.1 11.5 0.41 2.65 3.06 — 16,400 16,400 0.52 1.12 1.28 16,747 2027 0.92 362 6.98 10.4 0.01 0.30 1.97 1.99 0.27 0.46 0.48 — 1,974 1,974 0.06 0.08 0.17 2,000 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 1.46 1.23 12.0 10.5 0.02 0.52 2.89 3.41 0.48 1.33 1.81 — 1,834 1,834 0.07 0.02 0.11 1,841 2024 4.13 3.71 16.1 39.4 0.04 0.47 7.61 8.08 0.43 1.92 2.36 — 11,407 11,407 0.36 0.74 15.9 11,653 2025 4.04 3.67 14.1 39.1 0.04 0.36 7.69 8.05 0.33 1.84 2.17 — 11,944 11,944 0.37 0.80 16.5 12,208 2026 3.70 3.14 12.8 35.5 0.04 0.31 7.25 7.57 0.29 1.73 2.02 — 11,148 11,148 0.34 0.73 14.3 11,390 2027 0.23 54.6 0.98 2.37 < 0.005 0.04 0.30 0.34 0.03 0.07 0.10 — 481 481 0.01 0.01 0.46 486 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.27 0.22 2.19 1.92 < 0.005 0.10 0.53 0.62 0.09 0.24 0.33 — 304 304 0.01 < 0.005 0.02 305 2024 0.75 0.68 2.94 7.19 0.01 0.09 1.39 1.47 0.08 0.35 0.43 — 1,889 1,889 0.06 0.12 2.64 1,929 2025 0.74 0.67 2.57 7.14 0.01 0.06 1.40 1.47 0.06 0.34 0.40 — 1,978 1,978 0.06 0.13 2.74 2,021 2026 0.67 0.57 2.33 6.47 0.01 0.06 1.32 1.38 0.05 0.32 0.37 — 1,846 1,846 0.06 0.12 2.37 1,886 2027 0.04 9.96 0.18 0.43 < 0.005 0.01 0.05 0.06 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 79.6 79.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 80.4

Page 191 of 277 ends

Page 299 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
10 / 52

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 14.0 51.1 24.2 190 0.41 1.51 31.0 32.5 1.51 7.85 9.36 709 57,769 58,478 60.7 1.45 76.2 60,505 Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 5.40 43.0 24.4 79.3 0.39 1.48 31.0 32.4 1.47 7.85 9.32 709 55,702 56,411 60.7 1.53 13.0 58,395 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 7.76 46.1 8.53 120 0.29 0.21 31.0 31.2 0.20 7.85 8.05 709 35,803 36,512 60.3 1.46 39.4 38,494 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.42 8.41 1.56 21.9 0.05 0.04 5.65 5.69 0.04 1.43 1.47 117 5,928 6,045 9.98 0.24 6.52 6,373

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 3.54 2.69 6.98 89.1 0.30 0.16 31.0 31.1 0.15 7.85 8.00 — 31,078 31,078 0.61 1.03 64.9 31,464 Area 10.5 48.4 17.2 101 0.11 1.35 — 1.35 1.36 — 1.36 0.00 20,947 20,947 0.40 0.04 — 20,969 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 5,532 5,532 0.89 0.11 — 5,586 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 125 212 338 0.47 0.28 — 432 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 584 0.00 584 58.3 0.00 — 2,042

Page 192 of 277 ends

Page 300 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
11 / 52
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 11.4 11.4
T otal 14.0 51.1 24.2 190 0.41 1.51 31.0 32.5 1.51 7.85 9.36 709 57,769 58,478 60.7 1.45 76.2 60,505 Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 3.49 2.66 8.13 72.3 0.29 0.16 31.0 31.1 0.15 7.85 8.00 — 29,261 29,261 0.59 1.10 1.68 29,605 Area 1.91 40.3 16.3 6.94 0.10 1.32 — 1.32 1.32 — 1.32 0.00 20,697 20,697 0.39 0.04 — 20,718 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 5,532 5,532 0.89 0.11 — 5,586 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 125 212 338 0.47 0.28 — 432 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 584 0.00 584 58.3 0.00 — 2,042 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 11.4 11.4
T otal 5.40 43.0 24.4 79.3 0.39 1.48 31.0 32.4 1.47 7.85 9.32 709 55,702 56,411 60.7 1.53 13.0 58,395 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 3.50 2.66 7.70 73.3 0.29 0.16 31.0 31.1 0.15 7.85 8.00 — 29,425 29,425 0.60 1.07 28.0 29,788 Area 4.27 43.4 0.83 46.6 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 0.00 634 634 0.01 < 0.005 — 635 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 5,532 5,532 0.89 0.11 — 5,586 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 125 212 338 0.47 0.28 — 432 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 584 0.00 584 58.3 0.00 — 2,042 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 11.4 11.4
T otal 7.76 46.1 8.53 120 0.29 0.21 31.0 31.2 0.20 7.85 8.05 709 35,803 36,512 60.3 1.46 39.4 38,494 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.64 0.49 1.41 13.4 0.05 0.03 5.65 5.68 0.03 1.43 1.46 — 4,872 4,872 0.10 0.18 4.64 4,932 Area 0.78 7.92 0.15 8.50 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 105 105 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 105 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 916 916 0.15 0.02 — 925 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 20.8 35.1 55.9 0.08 0.05 — 71.5 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 96.6 0.00 96.6 9.66 0.00 — 338 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.88 1.88
T otal 1.42 8.41 1.56 21.9 0.05 0.04 5.65 5.69 0.04 1.43 1.47 117 5,928 6,045 9.98 0.24 6.52 6,373

Page 193 of 277 ends

Page 301 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
12 / 52

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.39 2.84 27.3 23.5 0.03 1.20 — 1.20 1.10 — 1.10 — 3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03 — 3,437 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.46 0.39 3.75 3.22 < 0.005 0.16 — 0.16 0.15 — 0.15 — 469 469 0.02 < 0.005 — 471 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.07 0.68 0.59 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 77.7 77.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 77.9 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —

Page 194 of 277 ends

Page 302 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
13 / 52

0.000.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Onsite truck
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 135 135 < 0.005 0.01 0.61 137 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 17.3 17.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 17.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.86 2.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 2.90 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.3. Site Preparation (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Page 195 of 277 ends

Page 303 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
14 / 52
5,314—0.040.215,2955,295—1.66—1.661.81—1.810.0535.539.73.954.70Off-Road Equipment
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 19.7 19.7 — 10.1 10.1 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

4.70 3.95 39.7 35.5 0.05 1.81 — 1.81 1.66 — 1.66 — 5,295 5,295 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 19.7 19.7 — 10.1 10.1 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.39 0.32 3.27 2.92 < 0.005 0.15 — 0.15 0.14 — 0.14 — 435 435 0.02 < 0.005 — 437 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.62 1.62 — 0.83 0.83 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.60 0.53 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.02 — 0.02 — 72.1 72.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 72.3 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.29 0.29 — 0.15 0.15 — — — — — — —

Page 196 of 277 ends

Page 304 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
15 / 52
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.05 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 158 158 < 0.005 0.01 0.72 160 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 146 146 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 148 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12.1 12.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 12.3 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.00 2.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.03 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.5. Grading (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Page 197 of 277 ends

Page 305 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
16 / 52
Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

4.43 3.72 37.3 31.4 0.06 1.59 — 1.59 1.47 — 1.47 — 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05 — 6,621 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 9.20 9.20 — 3.65 3.65 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.59 0.50 4.96 4.18 0.01 0.21 — 0.21 0.20 — 0.20 — 878 878 0.04 0.01 — 881 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.22 1.22 — 0.49 0.49 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.11 0.09 0.91 0.76 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 145 145 0.01 < 0.005 — 146 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.22 0.22 — 0.09 0.09 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Page 198 of 277 ends

Page 306 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
17 / 52
——————————————————Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 167 167 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 169 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 22.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.70 3.70 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.76 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

4.19 3.52 34.3 30.2 0.06 1.45 — 1.45 1.33 — 1.33 — 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05 — 6,621

Page 199 of 277 ends

Page 307 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
18 / 52
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 9.20 9.20 — 3.65 3.65 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.31 0.26 2.55 2.24 < 0.005 0.11 — 0.11 0.10 — 0.10 — 491 491 0.02 < 0.005 — 492 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.68 0.68 — 0.27 0.27 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.47 0.41 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 81.2 81.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 81.5 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.12 0.12 — 0.05 0.05 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

Page 200 of 277 ends

Page 308 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
19 / 52
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12.3 12.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 12.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.03 2.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.06 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.44 1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Page 201 of 277 ends

Page 309 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
20 / 52
1,544—0.010.061,5391,539—0.29—0.290.32—0.320.028.427.200.770.92Off-Road Equipment
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.17 0.14 1.31 1.54 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 255 255 0.01 < 0.005 — 256 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 4.67 4.26 2.93 49.4 0.00 0.00 9.83 9.83 0.00 2.30 2.30 — 10,506 10,506 0.21 0.39 44.8 10,671 Vendor 0.38 0.15 6.00 2.63 0.03 0.07 1.24 1.31 0.07 0.34 0.41 — 4,779 4,779 0.19 0.72 12.7 5,010 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 4.21 4.08 3.76 43.5 0.00 0.00 9.83 9.83 0.00 2.30 2.30 — 9,744 9,744 0.26 0.41 1.16 9,874 Vendor 0.37 0.14 6.32 2.71 0.03 0.07 1.24 1.31 0.07 0.34 0.41 — 4,782 4,782 0.19 0.72 0.33 5,001 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.65 2.58 2.36 27.0 0.00 0.00 6.13 6.13 0.00 1.43 1.43 — 6,297 6,297 0.15 0.26 12.4 6,392 Vendor 0.24 0.09 3.98 1.71 0.02 0.04 0.78 0.82 0.04 0.22 0.26 — 3,068 3,068 0.12 0.46 3.51 3,212 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.48 0.47 0.43 4.93 0.00 0.00 1.12 1.12 0.00 0.26 0.26 — 1,042 1,042 0.03 0.04 2.05 1,058 Vendor 0.04 0.02 0.73 0.31 < 0.005 0.01 0.14 0.15 0.01 0.04 0.05 — 508 508 0.02 0.08 0.58 532 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 202 of 277 ends

Page 310 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
21 / 52

3.11. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.35 1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.96 0.80 7.46 9.31 0.02 0.31 — 0.31 0.28 — 0.28 — 1,713 1,713 0.07 0.01 — 1,719 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.18 0.15 1.36 1.70 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 284 284 0.01 < 0.005 — 285 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Page 203 of 277 ends

Page 311 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
22 / 52
——————————————————Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
Worker 4.13 4.05 2.60 45.7 0.00 0.00 9.83 9.83 0.00 2.30 2.30 — 10,300 10,300 0.18 0.39 40.9 10,461 Vendor 0.38 0.15 5.76 2.52 0.03 0.07 1.24 1.31 0.07 0.34 0.41 — 4,704 4,704 0.19 0.69 12.6 4,925 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 4.02 3.89 3.71 40.5 0.00 0.00 9.83 9.83 0.00 2.30 2.30 — 9,555 9,555 0.26 0.41 1.06 9,685 Vendor 0.34 0.14 6.08 2.60 0.03 0.07 1.24 1.31 0.07 0.34 0.41 — 4,707 4,707 0.19 0.69 0.33 4,917 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.84 2.76 2.37 28.0 0.00 0.00 6.82 6.82 0.00 1.60 1.60 — 6,871 6,871 0.17 0.29 12.6 6,975 Vendor 0.24 0.10 4.26 1.83 0.02 0.05 0.87 0.91 0.05 0.24 0.29 — 3,361 3,361 0.14 0.49 3.91 3,514 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.52 0.50 0.43 5.10 0.00 0.00 1.25 1.25 0.00 0.29 0.29 — 1,138 1,138 0.03 0.05 2.09 1,155 Vendor 0.04 0.02 0.78 0.33 < 0.005 0.01 0.16 0.17 0.01 0.04 0.05 — 556 556 0.02 0.08 0.65 582 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.13. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Page 204 of 277 ends

Page 312 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
23 / 52
2,405—0.020.102,3972,397—0.35—0.350.38—0.380.0213.09.851.071.28Off-Road Equipment
Onsite
truck

1.28 1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38 — 0.38 0.35 — 0.35 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.86 0.72 6.63 8.73 0.02 0.25 — 0.25 0.23 — 0.23 — 1,614 1,614 0.07 0.01 — 1,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.16 0.13 1.21 1.59 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.04 — 0.04 — 267 267 0.01 < 0.005 — 268 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 3.94 3.56 2.55 43.1 0.00 0.00 9.83 9.83 0.00 2.30 2.30 — 10,105 10,105 0.18 0.39 37.2 10,261 Vendor 0.34 0.15 5.52 2.45 0.03 0.07 1.24 1.31 0.07 0.34 0.41 — 4,624 4,624 0.19 0.69 12.1 4,845 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 3.84 3.43 3.35 37.8 0.00 0.00 9.83 9.83 0.00 2.30 2.30 — 9,375 9,375 0.24 0.41 0.97 9,504

Page 205 of 277 ends

Page 313 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
24 / 52
Vendor 0.33 0.14 5.83 2.49 0.03 0.07 1.24 1.31 0.07 0.34 0.41 — 4,628 4,628 0.19 0.69 0.31 4,837 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.57 2.29 1.99 24.7 0.00 0.00 6.43 6.43 0.00 1.50 1.50 — 6,354 6,354 0.14 0.26 10.8 6,445 Vendor 0.23 0.10 3.85 1.65 0.02 0.04 0.82 0.86 0.04 0.23 0.27 — 3,114 3,114 0.13 0.46 3.53 3,258 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.47 0.42 0.36 4.50 0.00 0.00 1.17 1.17 0.00 0.27 0.27 — 1,052 1,052 0.02 0.04 1.79 1,067 Vendor 0.04 0.02 0.70 0.30 < 0.005 0.01 0.15 0.16 0.01 0.04 0.05 — 516 516 0.02 0.08 0.58 539 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.15. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.91 0.76 7.12 9.94 0.01 0.32 — 0.32 0.29 — 0.29 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Page 206 of 277 ends

Page 314 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
25 / 52

62.3—< 0.005< 0.00562.162.1—0.01—0.010.01—0.01< 0.0050.410.290.030.04Off-Road Equipment
Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.05 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.3 10.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.3 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 118 118 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 120 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.89 4.89 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.96 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.81 0.81 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.82 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 207 of 277 ends

Page 315 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
26 / 52

3.17. Paving (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.88 0.74 6.94 9.95 0.01 0.30 — 0.30 0.27 — 0.27 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.10 0.08 0.77 1.11 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 169 169 0.01 < 0.005 — 169 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.14 0.20 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 27.9 27.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 28.0 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Page 208 of 277 ends

Page 316 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
27 / 52
Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 116 116 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 118 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.0 13.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.16 2.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.19 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.19. Architectural Coating (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 0.11 0.83 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 361 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 209 of 277 ends

Page 317 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
28 / 52
Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 0.11 0.83 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 361 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.13 0.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 20.1 20.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 20.2 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 54.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.33 3.33 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.34 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 9.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.76 0.68 0.44 8.03 0.00 0.00 1.97 1.97 0.00 0.46 0.46 — 1,984 1,984 0.03 0.08 6.72 2,014 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 210 of 277 ends

Page 318 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
29 / 52
Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.74 0.66 0.60 7.11 0.00 0.00 1.97 1.97 0.00 0.46 0.46 — 1,840 1,840 0.05 0.08 0.17 1,866 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.11 0.10 0.08 1.04 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 — 279 279 0.01 0.01 0.44 283 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 46.2 46.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 46.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Mobile source emissions results are presented in Sections 2.6. No further detailed breakdown of emissions is available.

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e

Page 211 of 277 ends

Page 319 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
30 / 52
——————————————————Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 5,532 5,532 0.89 0.11 — 5,586
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — — 5,532 5,532 0.89 0.11 — 5,586 Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 5,532 5,532 0.89 0.11 — 5,586
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — — 5,532 5,532 0.89 0.11 — 5,586 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 916 916 0.15 0.02 — 925
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — — 916 916 0.15 0.02 — 925

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 T otal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Page 212 of 277 ends

Page 320 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
31 / 52
Apartme
Mid Rise

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 T otal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 T otal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 1.91 0.95 16.3 6.94 0.10 1.32 — 1.32 1.32 — 1.32 0.00 20,697 20,697 0.39 0.04 — 20,718 Consum
er
Products
— 33.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 5.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

8.56 8.10 0.87 94.1 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.04 — 0.04 — 251 251 0.01 < 0.005 — 251 T otal 10.5 48.4 17.2 101 0.11 1.35 — 1.35 1.36 — 1.36 0.00 20,947 20,947 0.40 0.04 — 20,969 Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 1.91 0.95 16.3 6.94 0.10 1.32 — 1.32 1.32 — 1.32 0.00 20,697 20,697 0.39 0.04 — 20,718

Page 213 of 277 ends

Page 321 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
32 / 52
Consum
Products
— 33.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 5.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
T otal 1.91 40.3 16.3 6.94 0.10 1.32 — 1.32 1.32 — 1.32 0.00 20,697 20,697 0.39 0.04 — 20,718 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 84.5 84.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 84.6 Consum
er
Products
— 6.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.77 0.73 0.08 8.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 20.5 20.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 20.5 T otal 0.78 7.92 0.15 8.50 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 105 105 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 105

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 125 212 338 0.47 0.28 — 432
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — 125 212 338 0.47 0.28 — 432

Page 214 of 277 ends

Page 322 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
33 / 52
Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 125 212 338 0.47 0.28 — 432
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — 125 212 338 0.47 0.28 — 432 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 20.8 35.1 55.9 0.08 0.05 — 71.5
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — 20.8 35.1 55.9 0.08 0.05 — 71.5

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 584 0.00 584 58.3 0.00 — 2,042
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — 584 0.00 584 58.3 0.00 — 2,042 Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 584 0.00 584 58.3 0.00 — 2,042
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — 584 0.00 584 58.3 0.00 — 2,042

Page 215 of 277 ends

Page 323 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
34 / 52
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 96.6 0.00 96.6 9.66 0.00 — 338
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — 96.6 0.00 96.6 9.66 0.00 — 338

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 11.4 11.4
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 11.4 11.4
Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 11.4 11.4
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 11.4 11.4
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.88 1.88
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.88 1.88

Page 216 of 277 ends

Page 324 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
35 / 52

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment T ype

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
T ype
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment T ype

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
T ype
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Page 217 of 277 ends

Page 325 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
36 / 52
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment T ype

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
T ype
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation T ype

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation T ype - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Page 218 of 277 ends

Page 326 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
37 / 52
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use T ype - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
T otal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily , ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily , MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily ,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Page 219 of 277 ends

Page 327 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
38 / 52
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily ,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Page 220 of 277 ends

Page 328 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
39 / 52

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase T ype Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Demolition Demolition 7/3/2023 9/11/2023 5.00 50.0 —
Site Preparation Site Preparation 9/12/2023 10/24/2023 5.00 30.0 — Grading Grading 10/25/2023 2/7/2024 5.00 75.0 —
Building Construction Building Construction 2/8/2024 12/10/2026 5.00 740 — Paving Paving 12/11/2026 2/26/2027 5.00 55.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/27/2027 5/15/2027 5.00 55.0 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment T ype Fuel T ype Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Demolition Excavators Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 367 0.40 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Site Preparation T ractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Excavators Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 423 0.48
Grading T ractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37

Page 221 of 277 ends

Page 329 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
40 / 52
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction T ractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 3.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name T rip T ype One-Way T rips per Day Miles per T rip Vehicle Mix Demolition — — — —
Demolition Worker 15.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor — 8.40 HHDT ,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck — — HHDT
Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 17.5 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 8.40 HHDT ,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 20.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 8.40 HHDT ,MHDT

Page 222 of 277 ends

Page 330 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
41 / 52
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 1,189 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 177 8.40 HHDT ,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 15.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 8.40 HHDT ,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 238 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 8.40 HHDT ,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 3,211,488 1,070,496 0.00 0.00 —

Page 223 of 277 ends

Page 331 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
42 / 52

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (cy) Material Exported (cy) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (sq. ft.) Acres Paved (acres) Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 — —
Site Preparation — — 45.0 0.00 —
Grading — — 225 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Apartments Mid Rise — 0%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Y ear and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Y ear kWh per Y ear CO2 CH4 N2O
2023 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2024 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2025 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2026 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
2027 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

Page 224 of 277 ends

Page 332 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
43 / 52

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use T ype T rips/Weekday T rips/Saturday T rips/Sunday T rips/Y ear VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Y ear T otal all Land Uses 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43,819 43,819 43,819 15,994,045

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth T ype Unmitigated (number)
Apartments Mid Rise —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 843
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 809
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft)Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
3211488 1,070,496 0.00 0.00 —

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

Page 225 of 277 ends

Page 333 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
44 / 52
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Apartments Mid Rise 9,898,238 204 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Apartments Mid Rise 58,663,924 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Apartments Mid Rise 1,083 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use T ype Equipment T ype Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced

Page 226 of 277 ends

Page 334 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
45 / 52
Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment T ype Fuel T ype Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment T ype Fuel T ype Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Y ear Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment T ype Fuel T ype Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment T ype Fuel T ype
— —

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

Page 227 of 277 ends

Page 335 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
46 / 52
Vegetation Land Use T ype Vegetation Soil T ype Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover T ype

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover T ype Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
T ree T ype Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
T emperature and Extreme Heat 7.10 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 7.50 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
T emperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft.

Page 228 of 277 ends

Page 336 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
47 / 52
Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density , and large (> 400 ha) fire history . Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score T emperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation 2 0 0 N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score T emperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation 2 1 1 3
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A

Page 229 of 277 ends

Page 337 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
48 / 52
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census T ract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 3.12
AQ-PM 38.1
AQ-DPM 34.5
Drinking Water 4.21
Lead Risk Housing 52.1
Pesticides 0.00
T oxic Releases 56.8
T raffic 0.03
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 22.6
Groundwater 74.8
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 65.9
Impaired Water Bodies 12.5
Solid Waste 0.00

Page 230 of 277 ends

Page 338 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
49 / 52
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 1.55
Cardio-vascular 10.1
Low Birth Weights 75.1
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 5.86
Housing 99.6
Linguistic 7.38
Poverty 96.7
Unemployment 79.0

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census T ract
Economic —
Above Poverty 8.045682022
Employed 1.822148082
Median HI 4.298729629
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 80.88027717
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 43.50057744
T ransportation —
Auto Access 0.795585782
Active commuting 99.7305274
Social —
2-parent households 0.333632747

Page 231 of 277 ends

Page 339 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
50 / 52
Voting 0.461953035
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 97.0101373
Park access 81.35506224
Retail density 79.64840241
Supermarket access 6.659822918
T ree canopy 91.32554857
Housing —
Homeownership 6.018221481
Housing habitability 22.28923393
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 45.7590145 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 9.931990248
Uncrowded housing 49.60862312
Health Outcomes —
Insured adults 86.94982677
Arthritis 99.5
Asthma ER Admissions 94.6
High Blood Pressure 99.7
Cancer (excluding skin) 99.5
Asthma 18.0
Coronary Heart Disease 99.5
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 96.5
Diagnosed Diabetes 99.7
Life Expectancy at Birth 5.6
Cognitively Disabled 43.0
Physically Disabled 99.4
Heart Attack ER Admissions 93.7

Page 232 of 277 ends

Page 340 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
51 / 52
Mental Health Not Good 34.8
Chronic Kidney Disease 99.7
Obesity 97.4
Pedestrian Injuries 60.6
Physical Health Not Good 96.4
Stroke 99.6
Health Risk Behaviors —
Binge Drinking 6.6
Current Smoker 46.7
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 78.5
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 50.2
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 98.8
Elderly 98.2
English Speaking 92.5
Foreign-born 44.9
Outdoor Workers 98.2
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 49.4
T raffic Density 1.9
T raffic Access 87.4
Other Indices —
Hardship 61.5
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 6.7

Page 233 of 277 ends

Page 341 ends

Southside Addendum Detailed Report, 6/29/2023
52 / 52

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census T ract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 26.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 15.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) No Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Y es Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Per Section 5.12, Population and Housing, used persons per household number of 2.5 consistent with 2023 EIR
Construction: Architectural Coatings BAAQMD Regulation 8 Rule 3 Operations: Architectural Coatings BAAQMD Regulation 8 Rule 3 Operations: Energy Use Pursuant to Berkeley's all-electric ordinance, natural gas converted to electricity Operations: Water and Waste Water WTP 100% aerobic

Page 234 of 277 ends

Page 342 ends

Attachment 4
RESOLUTION NO. ##,###-N.S

A RESOLUTION (A) ADOPTING THE ADDENDUM TO THE HOUSING ELEMENT

UPDATE EIR AND RELATED CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT(CEQA) FINDINGS; AND (B) APPROVING AND ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN

AMENDMENTS, INCLUDING AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND USE DIAGRAM TO

RE-DESIGNATE CERTAIN PARCELS WITHIN THE SOUTHSIDE PLAN AREA,

AND AMENDMENTS TO THE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, HIGH DENSITY

RESIDENTIAL, RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE, AND AVENUE COMMERCIAL LAND

USE DESIGNATIONS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH ASSOCIATED ZONING TEXT

AMENDMENTS TO INCREASE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL IN THE SOUTHSIDE PLAN AREA.

WHEREAS, the City of Berkeley, in accordance with the provisions of California Government Code Section 65300 et seq., is required to adopt a General Plan for its long-range development, and further to periodically update that plan to reflect current conditions; and
WHEREAS, on January 18, 2023, the City Council of the City of Berkeley approved and adopted a General Plan Amendment to update the Housing Element for the period of 2023-2031, including extensive community outreach and public input between June 2021 and January 2023, and certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (referred to as EIR or Final EIR) (Resolution No. 70,669-N.S), which evaluated the environmental effects of the proposed amendments prepared in connection with the Housing Element Update (HEU); and
WHEREAS, on February 28, 2023, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) found the adopted Housing Element to be in substantial compliance with State Housing Element Law; and
WHEREAS, in connection with the amendments, an Addendum to the certified Final EIR pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines has been prepared that describes the changes the proposed Project would have to the HEU, and compares the impacts of those changes to the impacts of the HEU identified in the EIR; and WHEREAS, the Addendum to the certified Final EIR determined that potential impacts associated with the proposed Project are consistent with potential impacts disclosed in the EIR. That is, the proposed Project would not result in any new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of significant effects previously identified in the EIR. Therefore, none of the conditions outlined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(1-2) requiring preparation for a subsequent EIR have been met. Further, none of the conditions outlined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3)(A- D) requiring preparation of a subsequent EIR have been met; and WHEREAS, based on the analysis contained in the Addendum, no further evaluation of environmental impacts is required for the proposed Project, no subsequent EIR is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, and the Addendum is the appropriate level of environmental analysis and documentation for the proposed Project

Page 235 of 277 ends

Page 343 ends

pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, and therefore the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program in the Final EIR sufficiently addresses impacts from the proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, the adopted Housing Element includes “Program 27 – Priority Development Areas (PDAs), Commercial and Transit Corridors” to pursue zoning map and development standard amendments in the Southside Plan Area to increase housing supply and production in the Southside Plan Area through changes to the allowable building envelope, ground-floor residential use, and existing zoning district boundaries by December 2024; and
WHEREAS, the adopted Housing Element includes “Program 33—Zoning Code Amendment: Residential” to apply minimum density standards expressed in “units per acre” to higher density residential and mixed-use developments with five or more units, as well as to study and establish residential objective standards to provide clarity and predictability to ensure adequate baseline capacity to meet housing targets; and WHEREAS, since 2016, the City Council has forwarded to the City of Berkeley Planning and Development Department, Land Use Planning Division, five referrals related to increasing the pace of housing production and the overall development potential in the Southside Plan Area; and
WHEREAS, on March 6, 2019, the Planning Commission received a presentation on Affordable Housing and Community Benefits and provided comments concurring with community feedback that consistently emphasized affordable housing above other community benefits for land value capture with increased development potential; and WHEREAS, on September 20, 2022, the City Council of the City of Berkeley received a presentation from Staff and provided feedback on proposed zoning and development standards to increase residential development potential – particularly student-oriented housing – within the Southside Plan Area; and
WHEREAS, on November 2, 2022, the Planning Commission received a presentation from Staff and provided comments and recommendations on proposed zoning and development standards to increase residential development potential – particularly student-oriented housing – within the Southside Plan Area, and requested Staff return for a public hearing with zoning ordinance and associated general plan amendments; and
WHEREAS, on April 19, 2023, the Planning Commission received a presentation from Staff and provided additional comments and recommendations on proposed zoning and development standards, which considered comments received at the November 2, 2022 meeting, and requested Staff return for a public hearing with zoning ordinance and associated general plan amendments; and
WHEREAS, on September 6, 2023, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and took public testimony, which was preceded by the distribution of notices in accordance with State and local noticing requirements; and, after conducting and closing

Page 236 of 277 ends

Page 344 ends

the public hearing, recommended that the City Council (1) Adopt a Resolution, as recommended by the Planning Commission to (a) amend the General Plan Land Use Diagram to re-designate certain parcels within the Southside Plan Area from Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential, and from High Density Residential to Residential Mixed Use, and (b) amend the General Plan Medium Density Residential, High Density Residential, Residential Mixed Use, and Avenue Commercial Land Use Designations to be consistent with associated zoning text amendments that increase residential development potential; and (2) Adopt an Ordinance, as recommended by the Planning Commission, amending the Berkeley Municipal Code (BMC) to increase residential development potential on parcels within the R-3, R-3(H), R-S, R-S(H), R- SMU, and C-T zoning districts and make conforming changes to other BMC sections, as well as adopt Zoning Map changes; and
WHEREAS, on November 14, 2023 the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the General Plan re-designation of certain parcels within the Southside Plan Area as well as an ordinance amending the BMC to increase residential development potential on parcels within the R-3, R-3(H), R-S, R-S(H), R-SMU, and C-T zoning districts, adopt Zoning Map changes, and make conforming changes to other BMC sections; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments are consistent with the adopted Housing Element and serve the public interest by facilitating additional housing capacity and production to better meet student-oriented housing demand in the Southside Plan Area; and
WHEREAS, the amendments would not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare of the City because they would facilitate development that does not substantially deviate from the current pattern of development and mix of land uses within the Southside Plan Area; would be completed in compliance with current building and fire codes and regulations; and would be subject to the City’s standard conditions of approval regarding noise and air quality, waste diversion, toxics and stormwater requirements, as well as applicable mitigation measures included in the Southside Specific Plan EIR and the Housing Element Update EIR ; and WHEREAS, the amendments do not change the designation of any parcel to reduce the intensity of use allowed under the existing General Plan or zoning pursuant to Gov.

Code section 66300(b)(1); and
WHEREAS, all documents constituting the record of this proceeding are and shall be retained by the City of Berkeley Planning and Development Department, Land Use Planning Division, at 1947 Center Street, Berkeley, California.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the amendments are consistent with Program 27 and Program 33 of the adopted HEU; that the environmental effects of the amendments were evaluated in the certified Final EIR of the HEU and the Addendum to the Final EIR; and

Page 237 of 277 ends

Page 345 ends

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council that the General Plan Land Use Diagram is hereby amended, as shown in Exhibit A, and the General Plan Land Use Designations are hereby amended, as shown in Exhibit B; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Addendum is hereby incorporated by reference into the certified Final EIR for the HEU; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to make non-substantive, technical conforming edits (e.g., correction of typographical errors and/or clerical errors) to the Berkeley Municipal Code, including but not limited to page, figure or table numbering, or internal cross-references to amended or new sections of the Berkeley Municipal Code, and to return to the Planning Commission and City Council for major revisions only; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that nothing in this Resolution shall be interpreted or applied so as to create a requirement, power, or duty in conflict with any federal or State law.

Exhibits
A: Maps of existing and proposed General Plan Land Use Diagram.

B: Text of General Plan Land Use Designation amendments.

Page 238 of 277 ends

Page 346 ends

Exhibit A
Map 1. Southside Area – Existing General Plan Land Use Designations Map 2. Southside Area – Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations

Page 239 of 277 ends

Page 347 ends

Exhibit B
Medium Density Residential
These areas of Berkeley are generally characterized by a mix of single-family homes and small to medium sized multi-family structures. The same uses appropriate in Low Density Residential are appropriate in Medium Density Residential areas. Building intensity will range from 20 to 40 dwelling units per net acre, and the population density will generally range from 44 to 88 persons per acre, with the exception of the Southside Plan Area.

Within the Southside Plan Area, except in areas located in the Hillside Overlay zoning district, building intensity will range from a FAR of less than 1.0 to a FAR of 3.0. Residential development is subject to a minimum density of 60 dwelling units per acre and a minimum population density of 150 persons per acre. There is no residential density limit. This allows for greater flexibility in housing types to maximize housing opportunities in the Southside Plan Area.

For information purposes, the compatible zoning districts for this classification are: Restricted Multi-family Residential (R-2A), which allows approximately 17 units per acre, and Multiple-family Residential (R-3), which allows approximately 26 units per acre. Height limits in the R-2A zoning district are typically 28 feet with provisions to allow up to 35 feet, and are 35 feet in the R-3 and R-3H zoning district (or 45 feet in the R-3 zoning district within the Southside Plan Area).

High Density Residential
In Berkeley, these areas are generally characterized by large, multi-family structures conveniently located near transit, the Downtown, the University campus, or BART. Appropriate uses for these areas include: residential, community service, schools, institutional, recreational uses, open space, and in some cases where allowed by zoning, ground-floor commercial and office. Building intensity will range from 40 to 100 dwelling units per net acre, and the population density will generally range from 88 to 220 persons per net acre, with the exception of the Southside Plan Area.

Within the Southside Plan Area, building intensity will generally range from a FAR of less than 1.0 to a FAR of 4.0. Residential development is subject to a minimum density of 100 dwelling units per acre and minimum population density of 250 persons per acre. There is no residential density limit. This allows for greater flexibility in housing types to maximize housing opportunities in the Southside Plan Area.

For information purposes, the compatible zoning districts for this classification are: Multi-Family Residential (R-4), which allows building heights of 35 feet with provisions to allow buildings up to 65 feet, and High Density Residential (R-5), which allows building heights of 40 feet with provisions to allow buildings up to 65 feet, and Residential Southside (R-S) which allows building heights of 35 55 feet with provisions to allow buildings up to 45 feet.

Residential Mixed Use
These areas are generally characterized by a diverse mixture of residential, commercial and institutional structures, located in close proximity to transit and major shopping and employment centers. Appropriate uses for these areas include residential, neighborhood- serving retail, offices, school, institutional, recreational uses, and open space. Building heights will generally range from two stories to eight either four or five stories, depending on type of use and location. Building intensity will range from 40 to 100 dwelling units per net acre, and the population density will generally range from 88 to 220 persons per net acrefrom a Floor Area Ratio (FAR)FAR of less

Page 240 of 277 ends

Page 348 ends

than 1.0 to a FAR of 7.0. Residential development is subject to a minimum density of 150 dwelling units per acre and minimum population density of 375 persons per acre. There is no residential density limit. This allows for greater flexibility in housing types to maximize housing opportunities in the Southside Plan Area.

For information purposes, the compatible zoning district for this classification is Residential Southside Mixed Use (R-SMU), which allows building heights up to 60 feet with provisions to allow buildings up to 65 feet or 75 85 feet depending on their location within the district.

Avenue Commercial
These areas of Berkeley are characterized by pedestrian-oriented commercial development and multi-family residential structures. These areas are typically located on wide, multi-lane avenues served by transit or BART. Appropriate uses for these areas include: local-serving and regional- serving commercial, residential, office, community service, and institutional. Building intensity will generally range from a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of less than 1.0 to an FAR of 8.05.

Population density will generally range from 44 to 88 persons per acre.

Within the Southside Plan Area, residential development in the Telegraph Avenue Commercial (C-T) district is subject to a minimum density of 200 dwelling units per acre and minimum population density of 500 persons per acre. There is no residential density limit. This allows for greater flexibility in housing types to maximize housing opportunities in the Southside Plan Area.

For information purposes, the compatible zoning districts for this classification are shown below with accompanying development standards.

Zoning District Maximum FAR Maximum Height
South Area Commercial (C-SA): 4.0 24-60 ft
General Commercial (C-1)1: 3.0 35-50 ft
Telegraph Avenue Commercial (C-T): 3.0-8.05 50-865 ft
West Berkeley Commercial (C-W)2: 3.0 40-50 ft

Page 241 of 277 ends

Page 349 ends

Attachment 5
To: Berkeley City Council,
From: Planning Commission (Jeff Vincent, Chair)
Date: September 15, 2023
RE: Southside Zoning Changes
We are pleased to forward you our recommendation for zoning changes, general plan amendments, and the Housing Element Update EIR Addendum for the Southside. We are grateful to staff’s thoughtful work to integrate multiple City Council (CC) referrals and incorporate community feedback through extensive outreach, in addition to ensuring alignment with the Housing Element.

Per our September 6, 2023 action, we look forward to CC’s swift action on Southside zoning changes. As you discuss, we wish to raise 3 issues discussed by the PC that were not ultimately included in the recommendation:

Workforce development and prevailing wage in construction. The PC considered the idea of a prevailing wage requirement for larger construction projects in the Southside area, such as those with 50 or more units or having 50,000 square feet or more in floor area. We did not feel the zoning code was the appropriate place to include such provisions, but we encourage Council to consider the feasibility of such provisions in the Southside.

Land value recapture policy. Council’s July 25, 2017 Resolution No. 68,133-N.S. (which “requires that land value recapture is included the preparation and implementation of all area plans and zoning considerations”) was referenced in our discussion. The PC did not feel there was enough guidance to propose any additional “capture” provisions, although we agree that they can be beneficial in concert with upzoning. For example, to support community benefits such as parks/open space and/or funding for affordable housing. In general, we do feel that the proposed zoning changes in the Southside may increase property values and that the city should explore ways to capture some of that increase to fund public goods. We encourage Council to consider the feasibility of this approach with regard to Southside.

Master leasing with UC Berkeley. The issue of property owners leasing their property to UCB and the resulting exemption from property taxes pursuant to California Constitution Article XII, Section 3(e) and California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 203 was discussed. While property tax exemption may be beneficial in some contexts, we raised concern about how this practice of leasing privately owned property to the university results in “lost” local tax revenue.

We were informed by staff that an agreement between UC Berkeley and the City on this topic is pending negotiation, so we declined to integrate any particular recommendation on this topic in the zoning and general plan amendments, however we feel this is an important and relevant issue for CC to address.

We appreciate your consideration of these items and we encourage your swift action to implement the recommended zoning changes in Southside.

Page 242 of 277 ends

Page 350 ends

ATTACHMENT 6. MAPS OF SOUTHSIDE PLAN AREA ZONING
Map 1. Southside Area – Existing Zoning
Map 2. Southside Area – Proposed Zoning

Page 243 of 277 ends

Page 351 ends

Planning and Development Department
Land Use Planning Division

STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 6,
2023
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Ashley James, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Amendments to Title 23, t
he Zoning Map, and the General Plan Relating
to the Southside Zoning Implementation Program of the 2023-2031 Housing Element Update

RECOMMENDATION
Planning Commission is asked to hold a public hearing, receive and provide comment on t
he proposed zoning text and map amendments, as w
ell as associated General Plan
text and map amendments, pertaining to the Southside Zoning Implementation Program of the 2023-2031 Housing Element Update, and make a recommendation for consideration by the City Council.

SUMMARY
City staff have prepared amendments to Title 23 (Zoning Ordinance) and the Zoning M
ap of the Berkeley Municipal Code (BMC) in response to: (a) City Council referrals, ( b)
recent changes in State laws related to housing, and (c) the City’s 2023-2031 Housing Element Update, which includes Program 27 to pursue zoning map and development standard amendments in the Southside Plan Area intended to increase housing capacity and production, and Program 33 to apply minimum densities to higher density residential and mixed-use developments with five or more units. The full text of the zoning ordinance changes can be found in Attachment 1. A summary table that identifies each Zoning Ordinance section and the proposed changes is Attachment 2.

BACKGROUND
Scope of Amendm
ents
“The Southside” refers to the area located on the south side of the UC Berkeley campus, roughly bounded by Bancroft Way, Dwight Way, Fulton Street and Prospect Street
1 (see Attachment 3). The Southside Plan was adopted in 2011. City staff have prepared Zoning Ordinance and zoning map changes to create or modify objective 1 Southside Plan Areas east of Piedmont Avenue are not part of this study, as they are in the Hillside Overlay area and have less development potential.

Attachment 7

Page 244 of 277 ends

Page 352 ends

Southside Plan Area Zoning Map and Text Amendments Planning Commission Staff Report September 6, 2023

Page 2 of 13 ends

standards, including building height, minimum residential density, Floor Area Ratio (FAR), lot coverage, setbacks, ground-floor residential uses, and zoning district boundary adjustments, to increase residential development potential—particularly student-oriented housing—in the following zoning districts within the Southside:
• Multiple-Family Residential (R-3) and Hillside Overlay (R-3(H)) • Residential Southside (R-S) and Hillside Overlay (R-S(H)) • Residential Southside Mixed-Use (R-SMU)
• Telegraph Commercial (C-T)

The Southside also includes seven parcels zoned C-SA, but no changes are proposed for those parcels. In addition, the zoning district boundary adjustments require conforming General Plan Land Use text and map amendments.

City Council Referrals
Since 2016, the City Council has forwarded five referrals related to increasing the pace of housing production and the overall development potential in the Southside by considering and codifying new zoning regulations for streamlined processes and less restrictive objective development standards. These referrals directed staff to reduce the development costs and administrative burden associated with discretionary review processes. (see Attachment 4).

State Laws Related to Housing
State law requires the City to identify objective zoning standards for the purpose of defining housing development projects that qualify for protections under the Housing Accountability Act (HAA) and to define a base project for the purposes of calculating density bonuses. The protections afforded by the HAA and the definition of a base project for density bonus calculations apply to a housing development project up to and including the maximum development allowed with use permits and/or administrative use permits. For example, the minimum rear setback in the R-3 district is 15 feet; however, the Zoning Officer may issue an Administrative Use Permit (AUP) to reduce the setback to zero. The reduced setback (in this case, zero) is the applicable objective standard.

State Density Bonus Law requires the City to grant a density increase over “the otherwise maximum allowable gross residential density,” which is the density allowed including standards modified with a discretionary permit. 2 2023-2031 Housing Element Update
The recently adopted and certified Housing Element Update includes two implementation programs relating to this effort. First, Program 27 states that the City will complete the Southside zoning text and map amendments by December 2024, which are intended to increase housing capacity and production. Second, Program 33 states that the City will study and establish residential objective standards to provide clarity and predictability, as well as establish a minimum density standard expressed in “units

2 Land Use Planning Division Memorandum, August 2, 2021. Housing Accountability Act / Density Bonus Base Projects – Objective Standards. State Density Bonus - Objective Standards-Housing Accountability Memo 08-21.pdf (berkeleyca.gov)

Page 245 of 277 ends

Page 353 ends

Southside Plan Area Zoning Map and Text Amendments Planning Commission Staff Report September 6, 2023

Page 3 of 13 ends

per acre” to ensure adequate baseline capacity to meet housing targets and achieve Housing Element Compliance.

Community Outreach
The proposed amendments are based on input from community engagement through the Housing Element Update and specific outreach related to the proposed changes in the Southside, as well as prior meetings with the City Council, Planning Commission, and the Southside Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Subcommittee.

Between September 2022 and May 2023, staff have presented the proposed Southside zoning changes to the following advisory bodies:

• September 20, 2022 - City Council worksession on Residential Objective Standards, including proposed zoning changes to promote Middle Housing in lower density districts and encourage increased housing capacity in the Southside.
3 • October 14, 2022 - City/University of California (UC)/Students Relations Committee presentation and discussion.
• November 2, 2022- Planning Commission presentation and discussion. • April 19, 2023 - Planning Commission presentation and discussion. • May 18, 2023 - Design Review Committee presentation and discussion. • June 15, 2023 - Design Review Committee presentation and discussion, continued.

Between 2021 and 2023, staff have presented the proposed Southside zoning changes to the following community organizations:

• East Bay for Everyone (EB4E);
• UC Berkeley Campus Planning;
• The Associated Students of the University of California (ASUC) Housing Commission;
• Southside Neighborhood Consortium (SNC);
• Berkeley Design Advocates (BDA); and
• Berkeley Architectural Heritage Association (BAHA).

Staff also conducted in-person events at the Berkeley Harvest Festival (October 15, 2022) and on Sproul Plaza (October 18, 2022) to collect community feedback, as well as an online survey (November 27, 2022 to December 18, 2022) to seek feedback from UC Berkeley students.
4 3 September 20, 2022. Council Worksession Residential Objective Standards on Middle Housing and the Southside. https://berkeleyca.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2022-09- 20%20WS%20Item%2001%20Residential%20Objective%20Standards.pdf 4 December 2022. Final Summary Southside Area UC Student Housing Survey. https://berkeleyca.gov/sites/default/files/documents/FinalSummary_Southside%20Area%20UC%20Stude nt%20Housing%20Survey%20-%2019%20December%202022.pdf

Page 246 of 277 ends

Page 354 ends

Southside Plan Area Zoning Map and Text Amendments Planning Commission Staff Report September 6, 2023

Page 4 of 13 ends

DISCUSSION
Staff are proposing: a) zoning district and General Plan designation boundary adjustments within the Southside; and b) new or modified development standards for zoning districts within the Southside (See Attachments 3 and 4). The zoning map and the proposed development standards can be considered independently, but are being proposed together for a comprehensive approach. With the exception of allowing ground-floor residential use in the C-T district, staff are not proposing any changes to permitted land uses or land use permit requirements in any district. However, the zoning map changes would result in changes to permitted land uses and permit requirements.

For example, the R-S district does not permit certain commercial uses such as food product stores and food service establishments; if re-zoned to R-SMU, those establishments would be permitted. Finally, consistent with the policy direction in the adopted 2023-2031 Housing Element Update and recent state laws, staff proposes to remove discretionary permits that would otherwise be required for residential additions (BMC Section 23.202.030(A)(1)) and adding the fifth or more bedroom to a lot on Southside parcels within the Hillside Overlay (R-3(H) and R-S(H) districts) (AB 916, 2002; BMC Section 23.202.030(B)).

Southside Zoning District and General Plan Designations Boundary Adjustments The proposed zoning district boundary adjustments consist of the following:

• R-SMU Expansion. The R-SMU district would expand into the areas indicated in Figure 1, below. Approximately four blocks west of Telegraph Avenue would change from R-S to R-SMU, and three blocks east of Telegraph Avenue would change from R-3 and R-S to R-SMU (see Figure 1).
• R-S Expansion. The R-S district would expand into the areas currently zoned R-3 indicated in Figure 2, below (see Figure 2).

No zoning boundary adjustments are proposed for the C-T district nor within the Hillside Overlay zone. These adjustments retain the overall north-to-south gradual stepping down of development intensity, along with denser development along the Telegraph Avenue corridor, consistent with the original Southside plan.

Maps of existing and proposed zoning and General Plan designations can be found in Attachment 3 and Attachment 5, respectively. The R-S, R-SMU, and C-T zoning districts are unique to the Southside and each has an underlying General Plan designation. For the R-S district, the underlying General Plan designation is High Density Residential; for the R-SMU district, the underlying General Plan designation is Residential Mixed Use; for the C-T district, the underlying General Plan designation is Avenue Commercial.

To make the proposed adjustments to the zoning district boundaries, the City Council would also need to amend the General Plan Land Use map to match the new zoning boundaries. Staff also proposes to make General Plan text amendments to the Land Use designations so that they reflect the proposed development standards for each zoning district (see Attachment 5).

Page 247 of 277 ends

Page 355 ends

Southside Plan Area Zoning Map and Text Amendments Planning Commission Staff Report September 6, 2023

Page 5 of 13 ends

Figure 1. Expansion of R-SMU District

Figure 2. Expansion of R-S District

Telegraph Commercial (C-T) District – Allowed Ground Floor Uses

The zoning text amendments include allowing ground-floor residential uses in the C-T district when located behind a commercial use that fronts the street (Telegraph Avenue, Bancroft Way, Durant Avenue, Channing Way, Haste Street). A permitted commercial

Page 248 of 277 ends

Page 356 ends

Southside Plan Area Zoning Map and Text Amendments Planning Commission Staff Report September 6, 2023

Page 6 of 13 ends

use would be required to occupy at least the front 30 feet of depth on the ground floor, measured from the front property line, and the entire building frontage, except for required utilities, driveways, pedestrian access and lobbies for residential uses. Ground- floor residential use is already permitted in all other existing and proposed zoning districts in the Southside.

Staff conducted outreach to the local commercial real estate and development community on this topic and heard that 30 feet would be the ideal depth for most retail, personal service, small office, and food and beverage uses that do not require storage space. The proposed standard is a minimum and therefore does not preclude a commercial depth that exceeds 30 feet. The requirement to provide commercial space along the entire building frontage, with some exceptions, is intended to balance to the creation of a pedestrian-friendly environment without overburdening new development.

Development Standards
Table 1 provides the general direction of the recommended changes for each development standard and the policy rationale for each recommendation. Each standard is further discussed below and the specific development standard changes can be found in Attachment 6.

Table 1: Summary of Proposed Southside Development Standards Development Standard and
Recommendation Policy Goal
Floor Area Ratio (FAR) –
Set a maximum FAR
• Allow flexibility in project design
• Provide predictability for the review process and
outcome
• Facilitate calculations for State Density Bonus and
possible local density bonus
Lot Coverage –
Remove maximum requirement
• E
ncourage housing development through
increasing capacity
• Increase predictability of development outcomes
through objective standards
• Increase flexibility through a menu of options for
open space and residential amenities
Setbacks –
Red uce s
etbacks and remove Use Permit
exceptions
Open Space –
• R educe requirement and increase
flexibility in meeting open space
standard
• Set requirement to a per 1,000 square
foot of gross residential floor area
standard, rather than per unit
Building Separation –
Remove minimum requirement
Building Height –
Set a maximum height limit and remove Use
P
ermit exceptions

Page 249 of 277 ends

Page 357 ends

Southside Plan Area Zoning Map and Text Amendments Planning Commission Staff Report September 6, 2023

Page 7 of 13 ends

Density –
• Set a minimum dwelling unit-per-acre
standard
• Remove minimum lot size requirement
• Help meet Housing Element goals to achieve
Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA)
• Set a density measurement (units/acre) that is
aligned with State Law
Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
Existing FAR standards are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2: Existing Maximum Height, Lot Coverage, and Floor Area Ratio Standards R-3/R-3(H)1 R-S/R-S(H)1 R-SMU C-T
(south of
Dwight)
C-T
(north of
Dwight)
Maximum
Height
35 ft 35 ft
(45 with UPPH)
60 ft
(Subarea 2 - 65 ft;
Subarea 1 - 75 ft
with UPPH)
50 ft
(65 with
UPPH)

65 ft
(75 with UPPH)
Maximum
Lot
Coverage
1-2 Stories:
45%
3 Stories: 30%
1-2 Stories:
65%
3 Stories: 60%
4 Stories: 55%
1-2 Stories: 55%
3 Stories: 50%
4 Stories: 45%
5 Stories: 40%
(100% with AUP)
100% 100%
Maximum
FAR
No Maximum 4.0 5.0, 6.0 with
UPPH
1 The allowed height in the Hillside Overlay Zone for new buildings on parcels with an underlying base district of R-3 or R-S is 35 feet (average and maximum) and 3 stories. For residential additions, the allowed average height is as required by the base district or the highest existing portion of the roof, whichever is lower; the maximum is 20 feet (BMC Section 23.210.020(C)).

Staff proposes to establish a new maximum FAR standard for each district in the S
outhside. The proposed FAR is based upon approximately 95 percent of a parcel’s maximum zoning envelope, including height, lot coverage, and setback requirements.

Table 3 summarizes the proposed FAR standards.

Table 3: Proposed Maximum Height, Lot Coverage, and Floor Area Ratio Standards R-3 R-3(H) R-S R-S(H) R-SMU C-T
Maximum Height 45 ft 35 ft/
3 stories 55 ft 35 ft/
3 stories 85 ft 85 ft
Maximum Lot
Coverage
(included for the
purpose of calculating
FAR only)
70% 70% 75% 75% 85% 100%
Proposed FAR 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 7.0 8.0
Lot Coverage
Some m embers of the Planning Commission expressed an interest in further simplifying the package of proposed Southside development standards. I n response, staff propose
eliminating the maximum lot coverage requirement because it is accounted for in the proposed maximum FAR standard. Removing lot coverage as a separate standard simplifies the package of development standards applicable in the Southside.

Page 250 of 277 ends

Page 358 ends

Southside Plan Area Zoning Map and Text Amendments Planning Commission Staff Report September 6, 2023

Page 8 of 13 ends

Building Height
The proposed changes to maximum height include: 1) increases in the maximum height; and 2) the removal of additional discretionary permits to exceed the maximum height. Height would continue to be measured as an average in the R-3 district and as a maximum in the R-S, R-SMU, and C-T districts. Height limits stated would be the maximum allowed, unless waived through State density bonus law,5 and would be measured only in feet and not also the number of stories. Specifically, the proposed changes are:

• Allow up to 85 feet in the R-SMU district (increase from 60 feet / four stories). • Allow up to 85 feet in the C-T district (currently 65 feet or up to 75 feet with a Use Permit north of Dwight, and 50 feet or up to 65 feet and 5 stories with a Use Permit south of Dwight). In response to Councilmember feedback, the distinction between C-T parcels north and south of Dwight would be removed, resulting in one height standard across the district.
• Allow up to 55 feet in the R-S district (increase from a base of 35 feet / three stories and allowable increases with an AUP). Currently, a maximum of 45 feet and 4 stories is allowed in the R-S with a Use Permit if at least 50 percent of the total building floor area is designated for residential use. • Allow up to 45 feet in the R-3 district (increase from a base of 35 feet / three stories and allowable increases with an AUP).

The current maximum height allowed in the Hillside Overlay (H) zone would continue to apply to parcels in the R-3(H) and R-S(H) districts.
6 Consistent with Council referrals,
the proposed maximum height standard in the R-SMU and C-T districts provide opportunities to reach 12 stories if a project were to utilize State density bonus law.

Parapets would be allowed to exceed the maximum height by up to 5 feet as of right; this change has been included in the general development standards for measuring building height.

Setbacks
The proposed changes to minimum setbacks include: 1) decreases in required setbacks; and 2) the removal of additional discretionary permits to further reduce setbacks. The proposed changes to existing minimum setback requirements are:

• Front Setback. No minimum front setback required for R-S, R-SMU districts.

Currently, a minimum of 10 feet is required, which may be reduced to zero with an AUP.

5 A Southside local density bonus program is under consideration. See Program 35 of the City’s 2023- 2031 Housing Element (https://berkeleyca.gov/construction-development/land-use-development/general- plan-and-area-plans/housing-element-update) and November 2, 2023 Planning Commission (https://berkeleyca.gov/sites/default/files/legislative-body-meeting-agendas/2022-11- 02_PC%20Agenda%20Packet.pdf).
6 BMC Section 23.210.020(C)

Page 251 of 277 ends

Page 359 ends

Southside Plan Area Zoning Map and Text Amendments Planning Commission Staff Report September 6, 2023

Page 9 of 13 ends

• Rear Setback. A minimum setback of 4 feet for R-S and R-SMU districts.

Currently, a minimum of 10 feet is required for the first through third stories of a building, and a minimum of 17 feet is required for the fourth story. These minimums may be reduced to zero with an AUP.
• Street Side Setback. No minimum street side setbacks required for R-SMU and R-S districts. Currently, the minimum requirement varies from between 6 feet and 10 feet, depending on the number of stories. The minimum may be reduced to zero with an AUP.
• Side Setback. No minimum side setback required for the R-SMU district.

Currently, the minimum requirement varies from between 4 feet and 10 feet, depending on the number of stories. The minimum may be reduced to zero with an AUP.
• Lower- and Upper-Story Setback. Reduce the various lower-story and upper- story side setbacks for R-SMU, R-S, and R-3 districts to a single setback of 4 feet (currently varies between 4 feet and 10 feet). Reduce lower-story and upper- story rear setbacks for R-SMU, and R-S districts to a single setback of 4 feet (currently varies between 10 feet and 19 feet; minimum rear setback can be reduced to zero in the R-SMU with an AUP).
• Shade Study. Eliminate the requirement for shade studies in the C-T district. • Front and Rear Setbacks in the R-3 District. Two members of the Planning Commission recommended open space at the rear of the lot to maintain transitions between the various districts within the Southside Plan Area. Based on this feedback, staff propose revising the R-3 front and rear minimum setbacks as follows:
o Fr
ont setback: Reduce from 15 feet to 10 feet.
o Rear setback: Reduce from 15 feet to 10 feet.

This proposal would allow for additional open space in the rear yard, offset by a reduced front yard setback requirement.
7 Open Space
Table 4 summarizes existing and proposed minimum open space requirements.

Table 4: Existing and Proposed Required Open Space
R-3/
R-3(H)
R-S/

R-S(H) R-SMU C-T
Existing
Per Dwelling Unit (sq. ft.) 200 50 40 40
Per GLA Resident (sq. ft.) 90 20 20 No min.

Proposed Per 1,000 sq. ft. gross residential
floor area (sq. ft.) 150 50 40 40

7 Note that for ADU projects, the minimum required rear setback remains 4 feet in accordance with State laws.

Page 252 of 277 ends

Page 360 ends

Southside Plan Area Zoning Map and Text Amendments Planning Commission Staff Report September 6, 2023

Page 10 of 13 ends

• Replace Unit Standard with Floor Area Standard: The proposed minimum requirement is based on a per 1,000 square foot ratio of gross residential floor area to provide greater predictability and flexibility in accommodating open space requirements for the variety of residential use types allowed in the Southside.

The standard is designed to increase floor area dedicated to residential uses while also preserving the requirement to provide residents with common and/or private usable open space and amenities on-site. Furthermore, the proposed standards are consistent with open spaces provided in recently-approved projects in the Southside. Both a new definition and measurement of gross residential floor area have been added to the zoning ordinance.

• Allow Shared Residential and Pedestrian Amenities. Based on responses to the Southside survey, staff propose greater flexibility in meeting the open space requirement by allowing a project to provide a portion of the total amount of required usable open space through the following amenities:

o S
hared Residential Amenities . A project may provide up to 50 percent of the total required usable open space with one or more of the following:

 Multipurpose rooms (e.g., conference s
pace, study/library)
 Fitness centers
 Pet washing room

Some Commissioners noted that shared indoor common spaces should promote opportunities for social connection and recreation among building residents, while still requiring usable open space located outdoors. The allowed amenities would accommodate a range of recreation and assembly activities, including social gatherings, meetings, and studying, and would be required to have a minimum width and length of 10 feet, consistent with current usable open space requirements. The proposed maximum allowance of 50 percent would ensure that both indoor and outdoor open spaces are provided in each project. Definitions of these terms are provided in the Glossary.

o P
edestrian Amenities. Several Commissioners expressed a need to improve the pedestrian experience in the Southside, as the proposed development standards allow additional development that is similar to a downtown environment, and to consider different types of social circles that benefit from open space – personal, building and neighborhood. In response, staff considered a new standard that would encourage pedestrian amenities along the building frontage within private property (between the sidewalk and building). Typically, this type of amenity space is required in downtown areas. For example, San Francisco requires streetscape elements such as planters, lighting, landscaping, and a minimum sidewalk width of 15 feet, and allows sidewalk widening or pedestrian street improvements to meet open space requirements. In Oakland, usable open space may be provided through public plazas that

Page 253 of 277 ends

Page 361 ends

Southside Plan Area Zoning Map and Text Amendments Planning Commission Staff Report September 6, 2023

Page 11 of 13 ends

are landscaped and include pedestrian amenities within the Central Business District.

The proposed change would allow a development project to provide pedestrian amenity space on private property along the building frontage toward meeting the usable open space requirement. Staff presented this concept to the Design Review Commission in May 2023 and June 2023 for discussion. Feedback included the need to incentivize this type of amenity space, to provide flexibility so that a wide range of creative designs may be possible, and to avoid creating standards that would result in monolithic building frontages. In response, the proposed standards include a minimum average depth of six feet from the front property line, not continuous along the building frontage. The following standards would apply:

 Incentive Credit: Each square foot of pedestrian amenity space is weighted as 1.5 square feet of required usable open space.  Location: The space cannot contain an area dedicated to off-street parking, loading or driveways.
 Minimum Dimension: Minimum average depth of six feet measured from the front property line.
 Design Standards: The space must be open to the sky, with exceptions for certain building encroachments (i.e., bay windows, balconies, galleries, awnings/canopies, or covered walkways).

Pedestrian-scale lighting must be provided, and a definition has been included in the Glossary. The definition is based on the proposed Street Light Comprehensive Plan, which will be considered by the Transportation and Infrastructure Commission this fall. Enclosed structures are not permitted.

• Residential Unit Entries: To provide a buffer between private ground floor residential spaces and the public sidewalk, staff proposes a minimum grade separation of 18 inches above finished grade for residential unit entries located on the ground floor within six feet of the front property line. Consistent with the BZO style guide, this requirement has been added to the supplemental use regulations section of the zoning ordinance (23.302.070).

Building Separation
Table 5 summarizes existing building separation standards for zoning districts in the Southside. Staff propose eliminating the building separation requirement in all districts; building and fire code requirements for fire rating and separation would still apply.

Table 5: Existing Building Separation Standards
R-3 R-S R-SMU C-T
1st story 8 ft 8 ft 8 ft
No minimum
2nd story 12 ft 12 ft 12 ft

Page 254 of 277 ends

Page 362 ends

Southside Plan Area Zoning Map and Text Amendments Planning Commission Staff Report September 6, 2023

Page 12 of 13 ends

3rd story 16 ft 16 ft 16 ft
4th story 20 ft 20 ft
5th story 24 ft
Density
Table 6 summarizes existing and proposed density standards. The pr oposed c hanges
include: 1) removing the maximum density standard for GLAs in all Southside zoning districts; 2) establishing minimum dwelling units per acre standards; and 3) removing the minimum lot area requirement. A new section (23.106.100 – Residential Density) is proposed to define residential density and its rules of measurement.

Table 6: Density Standards
R-3/R-3(H) R-S/R-S(H) R-SMU C-T
Existing
Minimum or Maximum D welling
Units per Acre None N
one None None
Minimum lot area (sq. ft.) per GLA
Resident 350
1 350 1 175 2 350 1
Minimum Lot Area 5,000 sq.
ft.
5,000 sq.
ft.
5,000 sq.
ft. None
Proposed
Minimum Dwelling Units per Acre 60 100 150 200
Maximum Dwelling Units per Acre No
Maximum
No
Maximum
No
Maximum
No
Maximum
Minimum Lot Area None None None None
1 124 residents per acre
2 248 residents per acre

Based on input from the Planning Commission and the community during the recent Housing Element Update process, a minimum density standard is proposed. As discussed above, a maximum FAR is proposed in the Southside. Regulating FAR allows more flexibility in unit size when designing a project, while still capping the overall built form and the resultant impacts to shade, etc. Further, a minimum density standard is consistent with Council’s stated intention to increase residential development in the Southside, as well as Density Bonus law, which recognizes density as being measured only in units per acre, and helps ensure adequate baseline capacity to meet housing targets set forth in the recently adopted Housing Element. Removing the minimum lot size requirement is complementary to the proposed minimum density standard, and simplifies the package of zoning standards by providing a single density standard.

Technical Edits
The proposed substantive changes to the Zoning Ordinance created the need for certain technical edits. These edits include table numbering in sections adjacent to those that have been modified. For example, edits to the table numbers in the R-3 district require re-numbering in the remainder of the R-prefixed districts (i.e., R-4, R-5), and Figure numbers. The addition of new definitions requires re-numbering of certain sections of the Glossary.

Page 255 of 277 ends

Page 363 ends

Southside Plan Area Zoning Map and Text Amendments Planning Commission Staff Report September 6, 2023

Page 13 of 13 ends

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Development projections for this project were analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the 2023-2031 Housing Element Update, which was certified by the City Council on January 18, 2023.
8 The Housing Element Update (HEU) EIR assumed that
approximately 1,000 additional dwelling units would be feasible with implementation of this project . S taff found that t he changes to the development standards as currently proposed would allow approximately 2,650 additional dwelling units, an increase in development potential compared to the amount analyzed in the HEU EI R of approximately 1,650 units, which requires supplemental CEQA review. An Addendum to the HEU EIR has been prepared, as some changes or additions to the HEU EIR are necessary. The Addendum concludes that the proposed changes would not introduce new, significant environmental impacts beyond those that have already been identified and characterized in the HEU EIR.9 Further, there are no substantial changes in the project, its circumstances, or substantially important new information that would cause the project to have new significant impacts or substantially increase previously identified significant impacts. None of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that would call for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred or would occur because of the changes currently proposed to the zoning regulations in the Southside. Therefore, Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the Addendum to the certified Final HEU EIR (see Attachment 7).

NEXT STEPS
Upon receiving Planning Commission recommendation and public comment, staff will forward a proposed draft Zoning Ordinance, Zoning Map and General Plan Text and Map Amendments, as well as the Addendum to the certified Final HEU EIR, to City Council for consideration and adoption.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Draft Ordinance – Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments

2. Reference Matrix – Southside Zoning Ordinance Amendments

3. Existing and Proposed Zoning Map

4. Referenced City Council Referrals

5. Draft Resolution - General Plan Map and Text Amendments

6. Existing and Proposed Development Standards Tables

7. Addendum to the 2023-2031 Housing Element Update EIR

8. Public Hearing Notice

8 Housing Element Update 2023-2031 Final EIR.
https://berkeleyca.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ATT%202%20FEIR_RTC.pdf 9 CEQA Guidelines Section 15164.

Page 256 of 277 ends

Page 364 ends

ATTACHMENT 8. EXISTING AND PROPOSED SOUTHSIDE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLES Table 1.

Existing Development Standards - Southside Area
Standards in gray are included in proposed changes.
"-" = not applicable;
P = Permitted
AUP = Administrative Use
P
ermit
UPPH = Use Permit Public
Hearing
NP = Not Permitted
R-3 R-3H R-S R-SH R-SMU C-T (south of
Dwight)
C-T (north of
Dwight)
Multiple-Family
Residential
Multiple-Family
Residential
Hills Overlay
Residential
High Density
Subarea
Residential High
Density Subarea
Hills Overlay
Residential
Southside District
Telegraph Avenue Commercial
Single-Family UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH
Two-Family UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH
Multi-Family UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH
Group Living Accommodation UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH Mixed-Use Residential UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH Live/Work NP NP NP NP NP ZC ZC
Ground-floor residential Allowed Allowed Allowed Allowed Allowed Not allowed Not allowed Commercial Uses Not Permitted Not Permitted Hotel, Retail w/ UPPH
Hotel, Retail w/
UPPH
Personal &
Household Service
w/ ZC;
Hotel, Retail, Food
Service w/UPPH
Personal &
Household
Service, Retail w/
ZC; Food Service
w/ ZC >1,500
sq.ft.; Hotel w/
UPPH
Personal &
Household
Service, Retail w/
ZC; Food Service
w/ ZC >1,500
sq.ft.; Hotel w/
UPPH
Max. Density (sf per GLA
resident) 350 350 350 350 175
(increase w/UPPH)
350
(increase
w/UPPH)
350
(increase
w/UPPH)
Min. Lot Area (sf) 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 No Min. No Min.

Max. FAR No Max. No Max. No Max. No Max. No Max. 4.0 5.0 (6.0 w/UPPH) Min. Open Space (sf per DU) 200; 90/GLA
Resident
200; 90/GLA
Resident
50; 20/GLA
Resident
50; 20/GLA
Resident
40; 20/GLA
Resident
40; No Min. for
GLA
40; No Min. for
GLA
Min. Height (ft) No Min. No Min. No Min. No Min. No Min. 35 35 Max. Height (stories) 3 3 3 (4 with UPPH) 3 (4 with UPPH) 4 (5 with UP) 5 with UP No max Max. Height (ft) 35 35 35 (45 with
UPPH)
35 (45 with
UPPH)
60 (65 in Subarea 2
or 75 in Subarea 1
with UPPH)
50 (65 w/ UPPH) 65 (75 w/ UPPH)
Max. Lot Coverage,
Interior/Thru Lot (%)
1-2 Stories: 45
3 Stories: 30
1-2 Stories: 45
3 Stories: 30
1-2 Stories: 65
3 Stories: 60
4 Stories: 55
1-2 Stories: 65
3 Stories: 60
4 Stories: 55
1-2 Stories: 55
3 Stories: 50
4 Stories: 45
5 Stories: 40
(100 w/AUP)
100 100
Max. Lot Coverage, Corner Lot
(%)
1-2 Stories: 50
3 Stories: 45
1-2 Stories: 50
3 Stories: 45
1-2 Stories: 70
3 Stories: 65
4 Stories: 60
1-2 Stories: 70
3 Stories: 65
4 Stories: 60
1-2 Stories: 60
3 Stories: 55
4 Stories: 50
5 Stories: 45
(100 w/AUP)
100 100
Min. Setback, Front (ft) 15 15 10 (No Min. w/
AUP)
10 (No Min. w/
AUP)
10 (No Min.
w/AUP) No Min. No Min.

Min. Setback, Rear (ft) 15 (No Min. w/
AUP)
15 (No Min. w/
AUP)
1st-3rd Story: 10
4th Story: 17
(No Min. w/
AUP)
1st-3rd Story: 10
4th Story: 17
(No Min. w/
AUP)
1st-3rd Story: 10
4th Story: 17
5th Story: 19
(No Min. w/ AUP)
No Min. No Min.

Min. Setback, Interior (ft) 1st -2nd Story: 4
3rd Story: 6
1st -2nd Story: 4
3rd Story: 6
1st-2nd Story: 4
3rd Story: 6
4th Story: 8
1st-2nd Story: 4
3rd Story: 6
4th Story: 8
1st-2nd Story: 4
3rd Story: 6
4th Story: 8
5th Story: 10
(No Min. with
AUP)
5 if Adjacent to
Res. District,
Otherwise No
Min.
5 if Adjacent to
Res. District,
Otherwise No
Min.

Min. Setback, Street Side (ft)
1st Story: 6
2nd Story: 8
3rd Story: 10
1st Story: 6
2nd Story: 8
3rd Story: 10
1 story: 6
2nd Story: 8
3rd-4th Story: 10
1 story: 6
2nd Story: 8
3rd-4th Story: 10
1st Story: 6
2nd Story: 8
3rd-5th Story: 10
(No Min. with
AUP)
Same as
Adjacent Res.

District,
Otherwise No
Min.

Same as Adjacent
Res. District,
Otherwise No
Min.

Min. Building Separation (ft)
1st Story: 8
2nd Story: 12
3rd Story: 16
(Reduce w/AUP)
1st Story: 8
2nd Story: 12
3rd Story: 16
(Reduce w/AUP)
1st story: 8
2nd Story: 12
3rd Story: 16
4th Story: 20
(Reduce
w/AUP)
1st story: 8
2nd Story: 12
3rd Story: 16
4th Story: 20
(Reduce w/AUP)
1st Story: 8
2nd Story 12
3rd Story: 16
4th Story: 20
5th Story: 24
(Reduce w/AUP)
No min No min
Min. Residential Parking
Spaces No Min.

No Min
(1 space/unit if
road narrower
than 26 ft)
No Min.

No Min
(1 space/unit if
road narrower
than 26 ft)
No Min. No Min. No Min.

Max. Residential Parking
Spaces 0.5 spaces/unit

0.5 spaces/unit
(None if road
narrower than 26
ft)

0.5 spaces/unit

0.5 spaces/unit
(None if road
narrower than
26 ft)

0.5 spaces/unit

Page 257 of 277 ends

Page 365 ends

ATTACHMENT 6. EXISTING AND PROPOSED SOUTHSIDE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLES

Table 2. Proposed Development Standards - Southside Area Standards in gray are changed from existing standards.
"-" = not applicable;
P = Permitted
AUP = Administrative Use Permit
UPPH = Use Permit Public Hearing
NP = Not Permitted
R-3 R-3H R-S R-SH R-SMU C-T
Multiple-Family
Residential
Multiple-Family
Residential
Hillside Overlay
Residential
Southside District
Residential High
Density Subarea
Hillside Overlay
Residential
Southside District
Telegraph Avenue
Commercial
Single-Family UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH
Multi-Unit Residential UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH
Group Living Accommodation UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH Mixed-Use Residential UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH UPPH
Live/Work NP NP NP NP NP ZC
Ground-floor residential Allowed Allowed Allowed Allowed Allowed Allowed.

Commercial use
must occupy front
30 feet of depth
Commercial Uses Not Permitted Not Permitted Hotel, Retail w/ UPPH
Hotel, Retail w/
UPPH
Personal &
Household Service
w/ ZC;
Hotel, Retail, Food
Service w/UPPH
Personal &
Household Service,
Retail w/ ZC; Food
Service w/ ZC
<1,500 sq.ft. or AUP
>1,500 sq.ft.; Hotel
w/ UPPH
Min. Density (DU/acre) - Round to
the nearest whole number 60 60 100 100 150 200
Max. Density (DU/acre) No Max. No Max. No Max. No Max. No Max. No Max.

Min. Lot Area (sf) No Min. No Min. No Min. No Min. No Min. No Min.

Max. FAR 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 7.0 8.0
Min. Usable Open Space (sf per
1,000 sf residential floor area) 150 150 50 50 40 40
Min. Height (ft) No Min. No Min. No Min. No Min. No Min. 35 Max. Height (ft) [1] 45 35 55 35 85 85
Max. Height (stories) No Max. 3 No Max. 3 No Max. No Max.

Min. Setback, Front (ft) 10 10 No Min. No Min. No Min. No Min.

Min. Setback, Rear (ft) 10 10 4 4 4 No Min.

Min. Setback, Interior (ft) 4 4 4 4 No Min.
5 if adjacent to R
District, otherwise
no min
Min. Setback, Street Side (ft) 4 4 No Min. No Min. No Min.

Same as adjacent R
District, otherwise
no min
Min. Building Separation (ft) No Min. No Min. No Min. No Min. No Min. No Min.

Min. Residential Parking Spaces No Min.

No Min
(1 space/unit if road
narrower than 26 ft)
No Min.

No Min
(1 space/unit if road
narrower than 26 ft)
No Min. No Min.

Max. Residential Parking Spaces 0.5 spaces/unit

0.5 spaces/unit
(None if road
narrower than 26 ft)

0.5 spaces/unit

0.5 spaces/unit
(None if road
narrower than 26 ft)

0.5 spaces/unit 0.5 spaces/unit

[1] Except in the R-3 and R-4(H) districts, building height is measured to the top of the roof. Parapets may exceed the height limit by up to 5 feet as of right.

Page 258 of 277 ends

Page 366 ends

Kriss Worthington
Councilmember, City of Berkeley, District 7
2180 Milvia Street, 5th Floor, Berkeley, CA 94704
PHONE 510-981-7170, FAX 510-981-7177, EMAIL
[email protected]

ACTION CALENDAR
July 12, 2016
(Continued from May 24, 2016)
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Councilmember Kriss Worthington
Subject: Allow Increased Development Potential in the Telegraph Commercial (C- T) District Between Dwight Avenue and Bancroft Avenue and Refer to the City Manager to Develop Community Benefit Requirements, with a Focus on Labor Practices and Affordable Housing

RECOMMENDATION
That the Council immediately amend the Berkeley Zoning Ordinance to allow increased development potential in the Telegraph Commercial (C-T) District between Dwight Avenue and Bancroft Avenue and refer to the City Manager to develop community benefit requirements, with a focus on labor practices and affordable housing.

BACKGROUND
The City Council sent a referral to the Planning Commission on June 30, 2015, regarding the conflict between the 5.0 FAR adopted by the Council for the C-T District and the other development regulations in the district.

On April 20, 2016, the Planning Commission considered modifying the development standards and community benefits. The Planning Commission voted to recommend the following to the Berkeley City Council:
a) That the staff proposed Zoning Ordinance development standards for buildings adjacent to Bancroft Way be applied to the entirety of the C-T District north of Dwight Way; and
b) That the Council develop community benefit requirements, with a focus on labor practices and affordable housing, before implementation of the proposed Zoning Ordinance language.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:

Minimal.

Attachment 9

Page 259 of 277 ends

Page 367 ends

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY:

Consistent with Berkeley’s Environmental Sustainability Goals and no negative impact.

CONTACT PERSON:

Councilmember Kriss Worthington 510-981-7170
Attachment:

1. April 20, 2016 Planning Commission Staff Report on “Changes to the Zoning Ordinance to Allow Development Potential Increases in the Telegraph Avenue Commercial (C-T) District”

Page 260 of 277 ends

Page 368 ends

To:

From:

Subject:

Page 1 of 1 ends

Kriss Worthington
Councilmember , City of Berkeley, District 7
2180 Milvia Street, 5th Floor, Berkeley, CA 94704
PHONE 510-981-7170 , FAX 510-981-7177 , EMAIL
[email protected]

CONSENT CALENDAR
April 4 , 2017
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Councilmembers Worthington , Wengraf , and Harrison
Referral to the Planning Commission to Allow Non-commercial Use on Ground Floor
RECOMMENDATION:

Refer to the Planning Commission an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to create a use permit process to allow non-commercial use on the ground floor in appropriate locations, w here commercial might otherwise be required.

BACKGROUND:

On January 20 , 2015 the City Council passed a similar item. This item seeks to indicate that this is a time sensitive issue that needs to be addressed this year.

The purpose and intent of the current ground-floor commercial requirement is to preserve, enhance , and ensure establishment of retail commercial use and to support active pedestrian-oriented uses for the street level of buildings that abut a public street.

In certain locations, especially on less commercially important side streets, that are midblock and aw ay from commercial nodes , this requirement may result in vacant space that detracts from the original intent of the requirement. An amendment to the Zoning Ordinance that allow s for broader definitions and flexibility of use on the ground floor, as a condition of approval of a Use Permit, would result in better projects and less empty commercial space.

If the City Staff determine that a full adoption w ould take a substantial amount of time w e suggest a pilot program for the C-T Telegraph commercial district not including telegraph itself.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:

Minimal.

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY:

Consistent w ith Berkeley's Environmental Sustainability Goals and no negative impact.

CONTACT PERSON:

Councilmember Kriss Worthington 510-981-7170

Page 261 of 277 ends

Page 369 ends

Attachment 8
To:

From:

Subject:

Page 1 of 2 ends

Kriss Worthington
Councilmember, City of Berkeley, District 7
2180 Milvia Street, 5th Floor, Berkeley, CA 94704
PHONE 510-981-7170, FAX 510-981-7177 ,
EMAIL [email protected]

ACTION CALENDAR
October 31 , 2017
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Councilmembers Kriss Worthington and Kate Harrison
City Manager and Planning Commission Referral:Facilitate Primarily Student Housing by a Twenty Feet Height Increase and Adjust Floor Area Ratio in the R-SMU, R-S and R-3 Areas Only from Dwight to Bancroft and from College to Fulton

RECOMMENDATION
Refer to the City Manager and Planning Commission to facilitate primarily Student Housing by amending the Zoning Ordinance to add a twenty feet height increase and adjust Floor Area Ratio in the R-SMU , R-S and R-3 areas only from Dwight to Bancroft and from College to Fulton.

BACKGROUND:

In the last few years students have become increasingly active at proposing ways to increase student housing. Housing is urgently needed in close proximity to the UC Berkeley campus as rents increase and the University population steadily rises.

Students, recent graduates , employees of the University, and local businesses contribute to the local economy, create jobs for the local community, and greatly enrich the community through their presence. Implementing this action would provide a place to live for many individuals who would otherwise have to reside far from campus.

Oftentimes, the quest to find living spaces is emotionally taxing on students and can decrease academic performance or leave students without affordable and safe places to live.

Increasing density in the area surrounding campus proves better for the environment, better for campus area businesses, and better for students. By reducing commute times, students will opt to walk or bike to class, reducing congestion on the road. A shorter commute will also increase student safety and allow students to participate in extracurricular activities that may run through the evening because students have to worry less about how they will get home. An enhanced sense of safety in the surrounding region is beneficial for all in the community. Finally, higher density benefits campus area businesses because it brings them more customers which supports the local economy.

Page 262 of 277 ends

Page 370 ends

Page 2 of 2 ends

Previous efforts to increase southside campus housing improved project viability just for the very small area of the C-T zoned blocks. Unfortunately even blocks on Bancroft directly across from the University still have excessive restrictions.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:

Minimal.

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
Consistent with Berkeley's Environmental Sustainability Goals and no negative impact.

CONTACT PERSON:

Councilmember Kriss Worthington 510-981-7170

Page 263 of 277 ends

Page 371 ends

Attachment 9
To:

From:

Subject:

Page 1 of 2 ends

Kriss Worthington
Councilmember , City of Berkeley, District 7
2180 Milvia Street, 5th Floor, Berke ley, CA 94704
PHONE 510-981-7170 , FAX 510-981-7177 ,
EMAIL kw orthington@cityofberkeley. info

ACT ION CALENDAR
May 1, 2018
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Councilmember Kriss Worthington
Referral to the Planning Commission to allow 4 temporary zoning amendments to increase student housing in the Southside Area.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Council refers the Planning Commission to allow 4 zoning amendments to increase student housing in the Southside Area though a Temporary Emergency Pilot Project.

BACKGROUND:

In current Planning Commission w ork plan indicates student housing zoning changes may take several years. The Planning Commission should explore the creation of a Temporary Emergency Pilot Project that allow s 4 zoning amendments to increase student housing in the Southside area between College to Fulton and Bancroft to D w ight.

A Temporary Emergency Pilot Project is the best solution especially with a surge in the undergraduate population. Because this Temporary Emergency Pilot Project w ill be in place of immediate policy change , this w ill deliver quick relief to those that need it most--the students.

The proposed Temporary Emergency Pilot Project w ill take place over a set time period of 3 years w ith a limited and clearly outlined number of projects. During this time period, notwithstanding what is outlined in the current Zoning Ordinance , projects will be permitted:
1) Allow 4 projects that convert commercial space to residential space ; 2) Allow 4 new projects to allow ground floors on any street to be converted into residential use expect on Telegraph Avenue;
3) Allow up to 2 tall buildings up to 12 stories
4) Allow 6 projects to include a 20-foot height increase in order to increase the availability of student housing
The Temporary Emergency Pilot Project will help to ameliorate those suffering from the shortage in student housing. It w ill also make a greener Berkeley by cutting the commute times for students at UCB , BCC , or other schools in the vicinity.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:

Minimal as this is only a referral.

Page 264 of 277 ends

Page 372 ends

Page 2 of 2 ends

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY:

Denser Housing close to campus will dramatically reduce greenhouses gases compare to students commuting by cars.

CONTACT PERSON:

Councilmember Kriss Worthington
Amir Wright
Toby Simmons
510-981-7170
[email protected]
[email protected]

Page 265 of 277 ends

Page 373 ends

Attachment 10
Kriss Worthington
Councilmember , City of Berkeley, District 7
2180 Milvia Street, sth Floor, Berkeley, CA 94704
PHONE 510-981-7170 , FAX 510-981-7177 , EMAIL
kworthi ngton@cityofberkel ey. info

CONSENT CALENDAR
To:
11/27/2018
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From:

Subject:

Councilmember Kriss Worthington
Short Term Referral to Expedite Components of the More Student Housing Now Resolution
RECOMMENDATION:

Short term referral to the City Manager and the Planning Department to promptly move forward with components of the More Student Housing Now Resolution and any efforts to increase student housing that do not require additional CEQA review, amend existing City ordinances and policies that prevent the implementation of SB 1227 , and provide a budget referral that would allocate the necessary resources as determined by the Planning Staff.

BACKGROUND:

This referral is intended to expedite the implementation of particular components of the More Student Housing Now Resolution. The Planning Staff have identified the conversion of second floor commercial spaces to residential units, the expansion of car-free housing, and the creation of ground floor residential units as not requiring additional CEQA review.

Therefore, the Planning Commission should be given the opportunity to vote on these policies at the earliest possible date. This Referral would also allow the City Council to approve a budget based on Planning Staff determination of needed resources for consultants and/or CEQA compliance.

Senator Nancy Skinner introduced and secured the passage of SB 1227 , which "requires a density bonus to be provided to a developer that agrees to construct a housing development in which all units in the development will be used for students enrolled full-time at an institution of higher education." This bill was created with both the City of Berkeley and UC Berkeley in mind, but existing City law may restrict the implementation of SB 1227. Therefore, the Council should recommended that the City of Berkeley make any administrative or ordinance changes necessary in order to take advantage of SB 1227. Doing so would not require additional CEQA review and would help actualize elements of the More Student Housing Resolution.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:

Budget referral to be determined by Planning Staff recommendation.

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY: No negative impact and consistent with city standards.

CONTACT PERSON: Councilmember
Kriss Worthington 510-981-7170
Holden Valentine 516-282-5400

Page 266 of 277 ends

Page 374 ends

Attachment 6
To:

From:

Subject:

Page 1 of 2 ends

Kriss Worthington
Councilmember , City of Berkeley, District 7
2180 Milvia Street, 5th Floor, Berkeley, CA 94704
PHONE 510-981-7170 , FAX 510-981-7177 , EMAIL
[email protected]

CONSENT CALENDAR
May 30 , 2017
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Councilmembers Kriss Worthington and Ben Bartlett, and Mayor Arreguin Planning Commission Referral for a Pilot Density Bonus Program for the Telegraph Avenue Commercial District to Generate Revenue to House the Homeless and Extremely Low-Income Individuals

RECOMMENDATION
That the Berkeley City Council refer a City Density Bonus policy for the Telegraph Avenue Commercial District to the Planning Commission to generate in-lieu fees that could be used to build housing for homeless and extremely low-income residents.

BACKGROUND
Under current state law, new development projects that get a density bonus , allowing up to 35 percent more density, are required to build inclusionary housing. lnclusionary housing is typically defined as below-market rate housing for people who earn 50 percent or 80 percent of the Area Median Income (AMI).

While it's great that developers are including some affordable housing in their market rate projects, affordable housing for the homeless and extremely low-income who don 't qualify for inclusionary units can be provided if developers instead paid fees into the Housing Trust Fund. This can be achieved through the use of a City Density Bonus for the Telegraph Avenue Commercial District, an area where many residents have expressed support for housing the homeless and the extremely low-income.

The City bonus fee would be equal to the in-lieu affordable housing mitigation fee, currently set at $34 ,000 per unit. Fees paid into the fund could be leveraged with other Federal, State and Regional affordable housing sources , resulting in significantly more affordable housing built through the Housing Trust Fund than currently available. The City has important policy proposals to assist the homeless and extremely low-income residents that urgently need funding.

The pilot program of a City Density Bonus in the Telegraph Avenue Commercial District could go a long way toward easing Berkeley's critical housing shortage by increasing incentives for developers to add more housing and give the city greater ability to deliver affordable housing.

Page 267 of 277 ends

Page 375 ends

Page 2 of 2 ends

FISCAL IMPACTS
This proposal will generate millions in new revenue to the Housing Trust Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
The proposed change is consistent with City Climate Action Plan goals supporting increased residential density. Additionally, new residential construction is subject to more stringent green building and energy efficiency standards and will help reduce per capita greenhouse gas emissions.

CONTACT PERSON
Councilmember Kriss Worthington 510-981-7170

Page 268 of 277 ends

Page 376 ends

CONSENT CALENDAR
February 14, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Councilmember Rigel Robinson (author), Vice Mayor Ben Bartlett (co- sponsor), Councilmember Kate Harrison (co-sponsor), Councilmember Mark Humbert (co-sponsor)
Subject: Referral: Southside Impact Fee Nexus Study

RECOMMENDATION

1. Refer to the City Manager to establish a development impact fee for projects within the Southside Plan boundary for the purpose of funding Southside public realm improvements. Staff should complete all necessary actions, including preparation of a Nexus Study pursuant to the Mitigation Fee Act.

2. Refer $250,000 to the FY 2023 budget process for a consultant to be engaged over a two-year process, starting in 2024, to assist with the vision, capital list, nexus study, fee schedule, and other requirements.

BACKGROUND
Under the Mitigation Fee Act, local governments are authorized to impose fees on development projects to fund new public facilities. Prior to approval of an impact fee, a Nexus Study is required to establish the purpose of the impact fee, the uses the fee will fund, the reasonable relationship of the fee, and the types of development that will be subject to the fee.

The Downtown Streets and Open Space Improvement Plan (SOSIP), adopted in 2013, is funded by development impact fees and in-lieu fees alongside grants and other sources.1 The SOSIP implements the Downtown Area Plan and provides guidance for actions to make Downtown Berkeley more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly, support community vitality, and promote economic development. Examples of major projects identified in the SOSIP include the Downtown Berkeley BART plaza, Shattuck reconfiguration, and Milvia bike lanes.

Much like Downtown, Southside is an economically vibrant, dense, mixed-use neighborhood with high levels of pedestrian activity. Southside also serves as the gateway between the UC Berkeley campus and the City of Berkeley. Establishing a 1https://berkeleyca.gov/your-government/our-work/adopted-plans/streets-and-open-space-improvement- plan-sosip

Page 1 of 41 ends

Page 377 ends

Southside Impact Fee and Open Space In-Lieu Fee CONSENT CALENDAR FEBRUARY 14, 2023 Southside SOSIP to fund public realm projects would enable the City to close funding gaps and meet the neighborhood’s infrastructure needs.

While the list of projects that can be funded by the impact fee are subject to the findings of the Nexus Study, potential projects include those outlined in the Telegraph Public Realm Plan (TPRP). The TPRP is a vision plan established in 2016 that seeks to “enhance Telegraph Avenue as a pedestrian-friendly place and distinctive destination” through scramble intersections, sidewalk improvements, public art, and more. The Southside SOSIP impact fee could also generate funding for Car-Free Telegraph, which was established as a Council priority through a February 2022 referral. Funding allocations for Southside SOSIP projects shall be determined in consultation with the appropriate City Councilmembers and shall be approved by the City Council.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
The Council could also consider an open space in-lieu fee. City staff is considering amendments to the 2011 Southside Plan to encourage the production of housing at all income levels.2 The draft objective standards presented in September 2022 propose a reduction in the minimum open space requirement — referring to areas such as balconies, courtyards, and rooftops — in order to increase floor area dedicated to residential development.3 Establishing an open space in-lieu fee would allow developers to pay the fee and opt out of building on-site open space, allowing more flexibility in project design.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Staff time and $250,000 from the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
None.

CONTACT PERSON
Councilmember Rigel Robinson, (510) 981-7170
Angie Chen, Legislative Assistant
Chloe Park, Intern
Attachments:
1: Berkeley Municipal Code 23.204.130: Open Space Requirements for C-DMU 2: Staff Report and Resolution Adopting C-DMU Open Space In-Lieu Fee 3: Downtown Area Plan SOSIP Fee Nexus Study
2 https://berkeleyca.gov/your-government/our-work/adopted-plans/southside-plan 3 https://berkeleyca.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2022-09- 20%20WS%20Item%2001%20Residential%20Objective%20Standards.pdf

Page 2 of 41 ends

Page 378 ends

DAVID SPRAGUE / FIRE CHIEF
2100 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR WAY 510.981.3473
[email protected]
October 30, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Dee Williams-Ridley, City Manager
Submitted by: David Sprague, Fire Chief
Re: Possible Impacts to Fire & Emergency Services from Southside Zoning Changes
Introduction
In 2023 the City completed a Standards of Coverage and Community Risk Assessment (SOC) to define appropriate levels of service based on a comprehensive analysis which included the impacts of increasing density and vertical growth. The SOC determined that fire and emergency resources need to be enhanced to meet current and future demand.

The ongoing intensification of land uses, building heights, and population will increase demand for fire and emergency services. The cumulative effect of zoning amendments and development projects necessitates an evolution of the City’s fire and emergency response programs to those suitable for a major urban fire department in staffing, unit types, and facility locations. Determining when, where and what type of resources to add requires monitoring of response times and Unit Hour Utilization (UHU) - the percentage of time that a response resource is committed to active incidents during a given hour of the day.

Current Situation
Fire service deployment, simply summarized, is about the speed and weight of response. Speed refers to initial (first-due) response of all-risk intervention resources (e.g., engines, ladder trucks, and ambulances) strategically deployed across a jurisdiction for response to emergencies within a travel time interval sufficient to control routine-to-moderate emergencies without the incident escalating to greater size or

Page 271 of 277 ends

Page 379 ends

DAVID SPRAGUE / FIRE CHIEF
2100 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR WAY 510.981.3473
[email protected]
severity. Weight refers to multiple-unit (Effective Response Force, or ERF) responses for more serious emergencies such as building fires, multiple-patient medical emergencies, vehicle collisions with extrication required, hazardous materials releases, or technical rescue incidents. In these situations, enough firefighters must be assembled within a time interval to safely control the emergency and prevent it from escalating into an even more serious event.

The following table summarizes the Department’s operational response performance for calendar year 2020. These best practices were used as the City has not yet adopted performance measures.

Best Practice
Response
Component
Time Reference
90th
Percentile
Performance
Performance
Versus Best
Practice and
Current Goal
Call Processing / Dispatch 1:30 NFPA 2:29 + 0:59
Crew Turnout 2:00 Citygate 2:05 + 0:05
First-Unit Travel 5:00 CityGate 5:53 + 0:53
First-Unit Call to Arrival 8:30 Citygate 9:32 + 1:02
ERF Call to Arrival 11:30 Citygate 18:50 + 7:20
As density and population increase, so will the volume of 911 calls. Each call has an impact on the system, including the availability of resources. Determining when to add additional resources requires monitoring of response times and UHU. The UHU percentage is calculated using the number of responses and duration of the responses to show the percentage of time that a response resource is committed to an active incident during a given hour of the day. A unit-hour utilization of 30 percent or higher over multiple consecutive hours becomes the point at which other responsibilities, such as training and meals, do not get completed. The following table shows a UHU summary for the City’s fire engine companies. The columns with blue header rows are the engines that are first due to the Southside area. The busiest engines are listed first. Engine 5 has two hours over 50 percent utilization and 11 consecutive hours over 30 percent utilization. The black outline represents all hours and fire engines that are over 30% UHU.

Page 272 of 277 ends

Page 380 ends

DAVID SPRAGUE / FIRE CHIEF
2100 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR WAY 510.981.3473
[email protected]
Hour Engine 5 Engine 1 Engine 2 Engine 6 Engine 4 Engine 3 Engine 7 00:00 23.23% 15.11% 17.16% 9.62% 10.14% 11.33% 0.58%
01:00 25.88% 10.21% 15.51% 11.19% 6.41% 9.09% 3.37%
02:00 18.81% 12.81% 10.79% 11.12% 9.66% 7.74% 3.56%
03:00 13.47% 6.63% 12.40% 6.71% 7.76% 4.40% 2.06%
04:00 11.55% 13.59% 10.26% 10.62% 7.61% 7.62% 1.69%
05:00 15.01% 6.44% 7.62% 3.69% 9.87% 4.93% 2.59%
06:00 11.08% 19.01% 10.05% 9.78% 13.02% 5.63% 3.00%
07:00 25.01% 21.97% 20.84% 18.37% 13.97% 8.97% 6.10%
08:00 30.47% 31.19% 22.80% 20.58% 20.92% 13.10% 5.44%
09:00 38.00% 31.75% 22.75% 28.75% 21.67% 14.57% 5.65%
10:00 41.58% 42.32% 28.32% 23.47% 25.77% 19.88% 11.49%
11:00 52.86% 31.20% 35.07% 41.62% 28.02% 23.70% 7.28%
12:00 49.05% 28.41% 31.70% 34.37% 20.78% 18.56% 9.29%
13:00 53.48% 43.37% 30.66% 31.32% 31.70% 29.91% 7.95%
14:00 45.24% 43.90% 39.12% 34.42% 36.53% 25.40% 15.68%
15:00 38.09% 38.93% 32.49% 31.93% 20.30% 18.31% 7.38%
16:00 47.27% 34.35% 34.50% 28.96% 22.18% 20.99% 12.14%
17:00 44.46% 33.94% 34.26% 22.25% 22.90% 20.69% 8.62%
18:00 32.84% 31.45% 30.75% 22.85% 23.40% 20.74% 11.46%
19:00 29.80% 30.92% 25.06% 29.59% 21.39% 18.51% 10.09%
20:00 25.59% 32.76% 23.66% 24.96% 20.72% 15.76% 9.20%
21:00 29.23% 20.37% 20.49% 18.23% 12.64% 12.76% 6.77%
22:00 26.99% 21.79% 16.67% 12.63% 9.51% 12.90% 4.69%
23:00 19.81% 24.27% 15.45% 21.47% 16.11% 8.64% 3.85%

Page 273 of 277 ends

Page 381 ends

DAVID SPRAGUE / FIRE CHIEF
2100 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR WAY 510.981.3473
[email protected]
The next table illustrates UHU for the City’s emergency medical service transport ambulances. The City’s ambulances have a high enough UHU that all four ambulances routinely respond to emergencies in the Southside area. Medic 5 (M5), M2, and M1 each have several hours of 50 percent utilization and Medic 5 and Medic 2 each have one hour over 60 percent utilization and at least 13 consecutive hours at or above 30 percent utilization. When ambulances are consistently this busy, assigned personnel often miss training, meals, and breaks, and are at higher risk to develop physical and mental health impacts.

Hour M5 M2 M1 M3
00:00 22.87% 17.48% 12.56% 9.32%
01:00 22.85% 15.75% 19.46% 9.27%
02:00 17.34% 16.40% 17.53% 7.35%
03:00 13.61% 16.98% 10.92% 4.04%
04:00 8.71% 14.86% 18.86% 6.86%
05:00 13.06% 14.24% 8.26% 3.46%
06:00 8.95% 13.17% 16.14% 2.94%
07:00 25.50% 34.83% 33.70% 12.56%
08:00 48.33% 29.77% 33.16% 15.43%
09:00 44.71% 39.61% 38.97% 27.70%
10:00 48.82% 45.75% 42.94% 33.54%
11:00 51.40% 60.08% 41.92% 34.01%
12:00 49.60% 55.48% 42.34% 27.61%
13:00 51.46% 44.70% 54.43% 42.82%
14:00 65.37% 47.39% 56.38% 36.85%
15:00 45.36% 37.26% 52.01% 28.99%
16:00 52.28% 54.10% 44.79% 36.74%
17:00 41.93% 46.57% 42.89% 27.86%
18:00 48.24% 46.87% 35.45% 25.95%
19:00 31.61% 34.82% 42.09% 19.44%
20:00 30.19% 34.40% 38.01% 15.91%
21:00 22.49% 30.65% 26.78% 17.02%
22:00 26.16% 22.41% 23.65% 11.37%
23:00 21.09% 26.63% 25.70% 6.88%

Page 274 of 277 ends

Page 382 ends

DAVID SPRAGUE / FIRE CHIEF
2100 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR WAY 510.981.3473
[email protected]
Background
According to US Census data, of the top 51 largest cities in California, Berkeley is already the second most densely populated city per square mile—second only to San Francisco—without factoring in the daily influx of Citywide employment, tourism, and cars on the freeways.

The City is evolving to improve its housing shortages by approving mid- and high-rise residential buildings. UC Berkeley is completing its new master plan to add students, faculty, on-campus buildings and housing off-campus. The ongoing intensification of land uses, building heights, and population density will make several sections of the City very urban—typical of the largest metropolitan cities for building fire and rescue/EMS challenges. The cumulative effect of these projects around the City necessitates a shift in staffing and response models as well as an increase in the flexibility of emergency medical resources. The City’s fire and ambulance programs must evolve to those suitable for a major urban fire department in staffing, unit types, and facility locations.

Conclusion
The Department’s objective is to elevate that there is likely to be an impact from this work that may result in changes to the risk profile the Department is obligated to prepare for, additional 911 calls, and additional density on the roadways. All of these would likely lead to an increased response time and unit-hour-utilization of Fire Department resources. The Department will monitor performance and make regular reports to the City Council along with budget requests aimed at maintaining or improving service levels.

Page 275 of 277 ends

Page 383 ends

Attachment 11

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

BERKELEY CITY COUNCIL
Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendments to Title 23 of the Berkeley Municipal Code, Zoning Map Amendments, General Plan Amendments and General Plan Map Amendments for
the Southside Zoning Modification Project
The public may participate in this hearing by remote video or in-person.

The Department of Planning and Development is proposing amendments to the City’s Zoning Ordinance (Title 23) in response to City Council referrals, recent changes in housing-related State laws, and the requirements of the City’s 2023-2031 Housing Element, to increase residential development potential—particularly for student-oriented housing—within the Southside Plan Area, by December 2024. The proposed amendments also include non-substantive technical corrections to ensure consistency throughout the Zoning Ordinance.

Proposed amendments affect the following Sections of Title 23: 23.202.020 (Allowed Land Uses), 23.202.030 (Additional Permit Requirements), 23.202.100 (R-3 Multiple Family Residential District), 202.130 (R-S Residential Southside District), 23.202.140 (R- SMU Residential Southside Mixed Use District), 23.204.020 (Allowed Land Uses),

23.204.110 (C-T Telegraph Avenue Commercial District), 23.302.070 (Use-Specific Regulations), 23.304.030 (Setbacks), 23.304.040 (Building Separation in Residential Districts), 23.304.050 (Building Height), 23.304.090 (Usable Open Space), and

23.502.020 (Defined Terms). New BMC Sections 23.106.035 (Gross Residential Floor Area), and 23.106.100 (Residential Density) are proposed.

The hearing will be held on, November 14, 2023 at 6:00pm in the School District Board Room, located at 1231 Addison Street, Berkeley CA 94702.

A copy of the agenda material for this hearing will be available on the City’s website at https://berkeleyca.gov/ as of November 2, 2023. Once posted, the agenda for this meeting will include a link for public participation using Zoom video technology, as well as any health and safety requirements for in-person attendance.

For further information, please contact Justin Horner, Associate Planner, at 510-981- 7476. Written comments should be mailed or delivered directly to the City Clerk, 2180 Milvia Street, Berkeley, CA 94704, or e-mailed to [email protected] in order to ensure delivery to all Councilmembers and inclusion in the agenda packet.

Communications to the Berkeley City Council are public record and will become part of the City’s electronic records, which are accessible through the City’s website. Please note: e-mail addresses, names, addresses, and other contact information are not required, but if included in any communication to the City Council, will become

Page 276 of 277 ends

Page 384 ends

Attachment 11
part of the public record. If you do not want your e-mail address or any other contact information to be made public, you may deliver communications via U.S. Postal Service or in person to the City Clerk. If you do not want your contact information included in the public record, please do not include that information in your communication. Please contact the City Clerk at (510) 981-6900 or [email protected] for further information.

Published: November 3, 2023 – the Berkeley Voice
Public Hearing required per Berkeley Municipal code 23.412.040(A) and 22.04.020(A) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I hereby certify that the Notice for this Public Hearing of the Berkeley City Council was posted at the display case located near the walkway in front of the Maudelle Shirek Building, 2134 Martin Luther King Jr. Way, as well as on the City’s website, on November 2, 2023.
__________________________________
Mark Numainville, City Clerk

Page 277 of 277 ends

Page 385 ends

Page 386 ends

Office of the City Manager
2180 Milvia Street, Berkeley, CA 94704 ● Tel: (510) 981-7000 ● TDD: (510) 981-6903 ● Fax: (510) 981-7099 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.CityofBerkeley.info/Manager

INFORMATION CALENDAR
November 21, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Dee Williams-Ridley, City Manager
Submitted by: Lisa Warhuus, Director, Health, Housing, and Community Services Subject: Measure O Bond Impacts on Affordable Housing Development in Berkeley

SUMMARY
In 2018 Berkeley voters approved Measure O, a general obligation bond that will generate up to $135 million for affordable housing developments. As this report demonstrates, the funds have had a significant impact on the production of new affordable housing units; expanding the City’s Housing Trust Fund (HTF) portfolio and creating a robust pipeline of new housing developments.

CURRENT SITUATION AND ITS EFFECTS
As of September 2023, $109,520,339 in Measure O funds have either been committed (via an executed loan agreement) or reserved (by Council action) for specific affordable housing development projects. This is actually a $1.9M decrease from 2022, as a portion of the Measure O funds for The Grinnell (formerly known as Blake Apartments) was replaced with the City’s HOME funds, which have an expenditure deadline. The projects with either committed or reserved Measure O funds are listed below:

Project Name Address Units Measure O Funds Status
Jordan Court 1601 Oxford 35 $3,501,884 Completed
Berkeley Way –
BRIDGE Affordable
2012 Berkeley
Way
89 $179,494 Completed
Berkeley Way Hope
Center - Permanent
Supportive Housing
53 $6,731,092 Completed
Berkeley Way Hope
Center Shelter
2012 Berkeley
Way
44* $6,909,837 Completed
Maudelle Miller
Shirek Community
2001 Ashby 87 $12,932,000 Under
construction
The Grinnell
(formerly Blake
Apartments)
2527 San
Pablo
63 $7,266,032 Under
construction

Page 1 of 8 ends

Page 387 ends

Measure O Bond Impacts on INFORMATION CALENDAR
Affordable Housing Development in Berkeley November 21, 2023

Page 2 ends

Project Name Address Units Measure O Funds Status
1740 San Pablo 1740 San
Pablo
54 $7,500,000 Predevelopment
BUSD Workforce
Housing
1701 San
Pablo
110 $24,500,000 Predevelopment
BART sites North Berkeley
& Ashby BART
TBD $40,000,000 Planning
Measure O impact: >535
units $109,520,339
* Shelter beds
The Council also reserved $17 million from the third issuance of Measure O (anticipated in 2025) for one or more of the pipeline projects listed in the table below. The final mix of funds for each project will be determined prior to the execution of the City’s loan documents.

Project Name Address Units City Funding Status
Supportive Housing
in People’s Park
2556 Haste 119 $14,359,593 Planning
St. Paul Terrace 2024 Ashby 50 $12,250,000 Predevelopment Ephesian Legacy
Court
1708 Harmon 80 $18,087,701 Predevelopment
Total City Reservations $44,697,294
Together, the awarded, committed, and reserved funds account for $126,520,339 in Measure O funds. More details about these projects can be found in the attached Measure O Projects spreadsheet.

Measure O’s Impact on the City’s Affordable Housing Portfolio Measure O supplements the City’s HTF program, which pools Affordable Housing Mitigation Fees, Inclusionary Fees, Commercial Linkage Fees, Condo Conversion Fees, and entitlement funds from the federal HOME program.

Prior to Berkeley voters’ approval of Measure O, the City was able to fund no more than one new construction project every few years. The 15-unit Harmon Gardens project was completed in 2011, and the next affordable new construction project was the 42-unit Harper Crossing, which was completed in 2018. The City issued an HTF Request for Proposals (RFP) in 2019 through which Council approved funding reservations for five new construction projects, all supported with Measure O, including four (Jordan Court and the three Berkeley Way projects) that were completed in 2022.

Page 2 of 8 ends

Page 388 ends

Measure O Bond Impacts on INFORMATION CALENDAR
Affordable Housing Development in Berkeley November 21, 2023

Page 3 ends

The City issued another HTF RFP in 2021 as well as a Notice of Funding Availability for an educator housing project on Berkeley Unified School District (BUSD)-owned land, and through those processes added three new construction projects to the pipeline (all currently in predevelopment). In 2010, the City had approximately 1,134 apartments in its portfolio of restricted affordable housing units. With completed projects, active projects, and pipeline projects, the City is on track to nearly double its portfolio in the coming years to more than 2,000 apartments.

The following chart shows the growth in the City’s affordable housing portfolio since 2010, and the impact Measure O has had on increasing the City’s inventory of apartments affordable to extremely low-, very low-, and low-income households.

Leveraging of City Funds
The City’s affordable housing development funds are most often reserved early in the predevelopment process. This allows project sponsors to compete for state and federal funds. Typically, the City executes a loan agreement once all permits are ready to issue and full financing has been secured, a process which usually takes years. At times City funds are loaned at site acquisition. As a result, funds may be reserved or committed for years before they are expended.

Most affordable housing developments leverage the City’s investment with at least 5-7 other funding sources. Measure O-funded projects that are completed or under construction have secured an average of $4.6 of other funding for every $1.00 of City 500
700
900
1,100
1,300
1,500
1,700
1,900
2,100
2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 Pipeline
Berkeley Affordable Housing Portfolio
Affordable Units
Year
of Development Funding Reservation
Measure O

Page 3 of 8 ends

Page 389 ends

Measure O Bond Impacts on INFORMATION CALENDAR
Affordable Housing Development in Berkeley November 21, 2023

Page 4 ends

funds. Leveraging data for funded developments can be found in the attachment to this report.

Measure O Disbursements
Once Measure O funds are committed to a project, they are typically disbursed on a monthly (or less frequent) schedule when the project sponsor has incurred eligible project expenses as well as satisfied various conditions of the loan agreement. The project sponsor submits an invoice along with documentation of each expense, which is reviewed and approved by multiple City staff before funds are released.

As of September 15, 2023, the City had disbursed $41,570,998 in Measure O funds through seven development loans. Four housing developments are complete (Berkeley Hope Center, Berkeley Hope Center Permanent Supportive Housing, BRIDGE Berkeley Way, and Jordan Court) and two are under construction (Maudelle Miller Shirek Community and The Grinnell). These represent a total of 221 units (including 44 shelter beds) completed with Measure O support to date, and another 150 currently under construction. The City supported 1740 San Pablo with acquisition funding, and the project is currently in predevelopment.

The City is working closely with the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) on the development of the Ashby and North Berkeley BART sites with a goal of restricting at least 35% of the new units for affordable housing. City Council reserved $53M in funding for the developments in 2021 through Resolution 69,833-N.S. Of the total reservation, $13M will come from Affordable Housing Mitigation Fees and $40M will come from the third and fourth issuances of Measure O.

In late 2022, BART and the City selected a development team for North Berkeley BART site that includes three nonprofit developers – BRIDGE Housing, Insight Housing (formerly Berkeley Food and Housing Project) and East Bay Asian Local Development Corporation. The team is still in the early stages of planning, but anticipate developing four 100% affordable projects at the site. The exact number of units and affordability levels will be determined later in the process. Council will have an opportunity to review the proposed projects when the nonprofit developers request development funds from the pool of reserved funds.

Developing affordable housing with Measure O funds supports the Strategic Plan goal to create affordable housing and housing support services for our most vulnerable community members.

BACKGROUND
In November 2018, Berkeley voters adopted Measure O which allowed the City to issue up to $135 million in bonds to fund housing for "low-, very low-, low-, median-, and middle-income individuals and working families, including teachers, seniors, veterans, the homeless, students, people with disabilities, and other vulnerable populations.”

Page 4 of 8 ends

Page 390 ends

Measure O Bond Impacts on INFORMATION CALENDAR
Affordable Housing Development in Berkeley November 21, 2023

Page 5 ends

As a bond measure dedicated to a specific purpose, Measure O required a two-thirds supermajority vote to pass. The measure passed with 77% of Berkeley voters voting in favor.

The City has issued Measure O bonds twice so far:
 In FY2020, the City issued $38,000,000 in Measure O bonds. The cost of issuing these bonds, including bond counsel, was $785,000. Net funds received were $37,215,000.
 In May 2022, the City issued $40,000,000 in Measure O bonds. The cost of issuing these bonds, including bond counsel, was $432,800. Net funds received were $39,567,200.

Measure O included provisions to establish an oversight committee as well as to conduct annual audits. The Measure O Bond Oversight Commission was first convened in April 2019. The Commission met seven times in 2019, one in 2020 prior to the pandemic, and again in February and March of 2021.

Subsequently, Council approved the assignment of Measure O oversight to the Housing Advisory Commission and dissolved the Measure O Bond Oversight Commission. The Commissions have reviewed requests for funding, made funding recommendations to Council, and received information about the status of funding reservations and commitments. Neither commission has produced its own report assessing the status of Measure O.

Finance contracted with an outside auditor to audit Measure O expenditures as required by the ballot measure. The first fiscal year including Measure O expenditures ended on June 30, 2021 and was the first year to be audited. The draft audit was completed on September 20th and had no findings.

Members of the public who are interested in learning more about Measure O funds as they are allocated and expended can consult the Housing Advisory Commission meeting agendas and materials online, and/or attend the Commission meetings.

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE IMPACTS
The City’s HTF Guidelines identify sustainable development as a City priority, and encourage developers to incorporate as many green building strategies and materials as is feasible. New construction affordable housing developments are typically built to third-party, green building standards such as LEED or GreenPoint Rated.

POSSIBLE FUTURE ACTION
Council will review and take action on funding reservations related to the development of affordable housing at the BART sites, which will be partially funded with Measure O funds.

Page 5 of 8 ends

Page 391 ends

Measure O Bond Impacts on INFORMATION CALENDAR
Affordable Housing Development in Berkeley November 21, 2023

Page 6 ends

FISCAL IMPACTS OF POSSIBLE FUTURE ACTION
The specific impacts of future Measure O reservations by the City Council will depend on the actions taken. Since the bond measure authorizing Measure O limited its uses to the housing activities described previously, any funds reserved will be for housing activities.

CONTACT PERSON
Jenny Wyant, Senior Community Development Project Coordinator, HHCS, 510-981-5228
Attachment:
1: Affordable Housing Projects Supported by Measure O

Page 6 of 8 ends

Page 392 ends

Project Name Project Address Development Partner Description Units1 Affordability Total Measure O
Funds Committed
or Reserved2
Measure O
Disbursements
Through
September 2023
Total City
Funds
Reserved
Projected Sources of
Funds3 Project Status
BRIDGE Berkeley Way 2012 Berkeley Way BRIDGE Housing
89 affordable homes and services
for low- and very low- income
families.
89 50-60% AMI $179,494 $161,544 $2,774,925 Measure O, HTF Completed Berkeley Hope Center 2012 Berkeley Way Insight Housing / BRIDGE Housing
32-bed homeless shelter, 12
transitional beds for homeless
veterans, a community kitchen and
wrap-around services for mental
health, substance abuse, job
training and social activities.
44 0-30% AMI $6,909,837 $6,652,191 $16,964,507
Berkeley's Housing Trust Fund
(HTF), Measure U14 (U1),
Measure O
Completed
Berkeley Hope Center Permanent
Supportive Housing 2012 Berkeley Way Insight Housing / BRIDGE Housing
53 permanent supportive housing
apartments. 53 0-30% AMI $6,731,092 $6,721,092 $7,727,630 Measure O, HTF Completed Jordan Court 1601 Oxford Street Satellite Affordable Housing Associates (SAHA)
34 affordable studio units for
seniors. 12 units will also be set
aside for formerly homeless
households.
35 20-60% AMI $3,501,884 $3,501,884 $6,026,927 HTF, Measure O Completed Maudelle Miller Shirek Community 2001 Ashby Avenue Resources for Community Development (RCD)
86 apartments
for families and individuals. 12
units will also be set aside for
formerly homeless households.
87 20-80% AMI $12,932,000 $11,225,017 $17,000,000 Measure O, U1, LHTF Under Construction The Grinnell
(formerly Blake Apartments)
2527 San Pablo
Avenue SAHA
21 studio units, eight one-bedroom
units, 33 two-bedroom units and
one three-bedroom manager’s
unit. 12 units are prioritized for
people with an intellectual or
developmental disability.
63 30-60% AMI $7,266,032 $7,266,032 $12,000,000 Measure O, U1, State Local Housing Trust Fund (LHTF) Under Construction
1740 San Pablo Avenue 1740 San Pablo
Avenue BRIDGE Housing 53 new affordable homes for
families 54 30-60% AMI $7,500,000 $6,043,238 $7,500,000 Measure O Predevelopment Berkeley Unified School District
(BUSD) Workforce Housing
Development
1701 San Pablo
Avenue BUSD/SAHA/Abode
Approximately 109 homes in a five
to six story building. Employees of
BUSD and their households will
have a leasing preference.
110 30-120% AMI $24,500,000 - $24,500,000 Measure O Predevelopment BART Sites Ashby and North
Berkeley TBD TBD TBD TBD $40,000,000 - $53,000,000 Measure O, HTF Planning >535 New Units $109,520,339 $41,570,998 $147,493,989
Supportive Housing at People's Park 2556 Haste Street TBD 118 affordable units with 62 units
set aside for formerly homeless
households.
119 10-50% AMI FR5 - $14,359,593 TBD Planning
St. Paul Terrace 2024 Ashby Avenue
Community Housing
Development Corporation
(CHDC)
49 affordable units, including 11
studios, 6 one-bedrooms and 17
two-bedrooms, and 15 three-
bedrooms.
50 30-60% AMI FR - $12,250,000 TBD Predevelopment
Ephesians Legacy Court 1708 Harmon Avenue CHDC 79 one-bedroom units. 80 30-60% AMI FP6 - $18,087,701 TBD Predevelopment 249 $44,697,294
4 General Funds generated pursuant to Measure U1
5 Funding Reservation that the City Council has approved from currently available affordable housing funds and from forward reservations of up to $17 million from the third issuance of Measure O bonds and $2.5 million in FY2023 general funds generated pursuant to Measure U1
6 Funding Prioritization by City Council prioritizing future housing funds (including but not limited to HTF and Measure O funds) City of Berkeley
Affordable Housing Projects Supported by Measure O
Total Authorized Bonds = $135M
Projects with Measure O Commitments and Reservations
1 total units, including managers' units
2 committed = in contract, and reserved = set aside for a particular project 3 the final mix of funds is determined at loan closing
Projects with City Funding Reservations
Measure O Impact

Page 7 of 8 ends

Page 393 ends

Project Name Project Budget
City Funds
(including
Measure O)
Non-City Funds Leveraging
Ratio Non-City Sources Notes
BRIDGE Berkeley Way $ 62,563,741 $ 2,774,925 $ 59,788,816 22.5 A1, AHP, AHSC, Tax Credits, TE Bond
Insight Housing Hope Center $ 19,917,041 $ 16,964,507 $ 2,952,534 1.2 A1, BFHP Insight Housing Hope Center
Permanent Supportive Housing $ 39,589,497 $ 7,727,630 $ 31,861,867 5.1 A1, Boomerang, AHSC, NPLH, SHMHP, Tax Credits, TE Bond
Jordan Court $ 24,961,105 $ 6,026,927 $ 18,934,178 4.1 A1, AHP, NPLH, Tax Credits, TE Bond Maudelle Miller Shirek Community $ 86,930,256 $ 17,000,000 $ 69,930,256 5.1 AHSC, IIG, NPLH, Tax Credits, TE Bond
The Grinnell $ 52,284,217 $ 12,000,000 $ 40,284,217 4.4 AHSC, DDS, HCD Accelerator, IIG -
Average leveraging ratio for Berkeley Way as
a whole = 4.4
BRIDGE and BFHP spread the City subsidy
amongst the three projects, but prioritized the
shelter portion for City funding due to limited
sources for that type of housing.

Leveraging of Measure O/City Subsidy

Page 8 of 8 ends

Page 394 ends

INFORMATION CALENDAR
November 21, 2023
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Dee Williams-Ridley, City Manager
Submitted by: Jordan Klein, Director, Planning and Development Department Subject: LPO NOD: 60 Panoramic Way, #LMIN2023-0001

INTRODUCTION
The attached Notice of Decision (NOD) for the Landmarks Designation is presented to the Mayor and City Council pursuant to Berkeley Municipal Code/Landmarks Preservation Ordinance (BMC/LPO) Section 3.24.160, which requires that “a copy of the Notice of Decision shall be filed with the City Clerk and the City Clerk shall present said copy to the City Council at its next regular meeting.”

CURRENT SITUATION AND ITS EFFECTS
The Landmark Preservation Commission (LPO/Commission) has designated the subject property as a City Landmark. This action is subject to a 15-day appeal period that began on October 31, 2023, after being postponed from August 29, 2023.

BACKGROUND
BMC/LPO Section 3.24.190 allows the Council to review any action of the Commission in granting or denying Landmark, Structure of Merit or Historic District status. In order for Council to review the decision on its merits, Council must appeal the NOD. To do so, a Councilmember must move this Information Item to Action and then move to “certify” the decision. Such action must be taken within 15 days from the mailing of the NOD or by November 14, 2023. Such certification to Council shall stay all proceedings in the same manner as the filing of an appeal.

If the Council chooses to appeal the action of the Commission, then a public hearing will be set within 25 days pursuant to BMC/LPO Section 3.24.300. The Council must then rule on the designation within 30 days from the date that the public hearing is opened or the decision of the Commission is automatically deemed affirmed.

Unless the Council wishes to review the determination of the Commission and make its own decision, the attached NOD is deemed received and filed.

At their meeting on September 12, 2023, City Council received an Information Report citing this LPC decision and announcing the conclusion of the 15-day appeal period.

Page 1 of 33 ends

Page 395 ends

LPO NOD: 60 Panoramic Way/#LMIN2023-0001 INFORMATION CALENDAR November 21, 2023

Page 2 ends

However, staff postponed the appeal period to commence on October 31, 2023 in order to correct a clerical oversight in the distribution of the public notices.

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY & CLIMATE IMPACTS
Landmark designation provides opportunities for the adaptive re-use and rehabilitation of historic resources within the City. The rehabilitation of these resources, rather than their removal, achieves construction and demolition waste diversion, and promotes investment in existing urban centers.

POSSIBLE FUTURE ACTION
The Council may choose to certify or appeal the decision to grant designation status, setting the matter for public hearing at a future date.

FISCAL IMPACTS OF POSSIBLE FUTURE ACTION
There are no known fiscal impacts associated with this designation action.

CONTACT PERSON
Reina Kapadia, AICP, Senior Planner, Planning and Development Department, 510- 981-7410
Attachments:
1: Notice of Decision – 60 Panoramic Way, #LMIN2023-0001

Page 2 of 33 ends

Page 396 ends

Attachment 1, Part 1

L A N D M A R K S

P R E S E R V A T I O N

C O M M I S S I O N
N o t i c e o f D e c i s i o n
DATE OF BOARD DECISION: June 1, 2023
DATE NOTICE MAILED: August 28, 2023October 30, 2023
APPEAL PERIOD EXPIRATION: September 12, 2023November 14, 2023 EFFECTIVE DATE OF PERMIT (Barring Appeal or Certification): September 13, 2023November 15, 20231
60 Panoramic Way – William J. Moore
House
Landmark application #LMIN2023-0001 for the consideration of City Landmark or Structure of Merit designation status for a residential building constructed in 1913 that is a Contributing Property to the Panoramic Hill National Register Historic District – APN 55-1853-15
The Landmarks Preservation Commission of the City of Berkeley, after conducting a public hearing, APPROVED the following request:
 Structure of Merit designation
APPLICANT: Jordan Kanarek and Gabrielle Goldstein
60 Panoramic Way
Berkeley, CA 94704
ZONING DISTRICT: Environmental Safety-Residential (ES-R) 1 Pursuant to BMC Chapter 3.24, the City Council may “certify” any decision of the LPC for review, which has the same effect as an appeal. In most cases, the Council must certify the LPC decision during the 14-day appeal period. However, pursuant to BMC Section 1.04.070, if any portion of the appeal period falls within a Council recess, the deadline for Council certification is suspended until the first Council meeting after the recess, plus the number of days of the appeal period that occurred during the recess, minus one day. If there is no appeal or certification, the Use Permit becomes effective the day after the certification deadline has passed.

Page 3 of 33 ends

Page 397 ends

LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION

NOTICE OF DECISION
#LMIN2023-0001
60 Panoramic Way
October 30, 2023

Page 2 of 5 ends

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS: Categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Section 15061(b)(3).

Page 4 of 33 ends

Page 398 ends

LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION

NOTICE OF DECISION
#LMIN2023-0001
60 Panoramic Way
October 30, 2023

Page 3 of 5 ends

The application materials for this project is available online at:
https://berkeleyca.gov/construction-development/land-use-development/zoning-projects or https://permits.cityofberkeley.info/CitizenAccess/Default.aspx

FINDINGS FOR FINAL ACTION AND APPLICATION ARE ATTACHED TO THIS NOTICE COMMISSION VOTE: 8-0-0-1
YES: ADAMS, CRANDALL, ENCHILL, FINACOM, LEUSCHNER, MONTGOMERY,

SCHWARTZ, TWU
NO: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: LINVILL
TO APPEAL THIS DECISION (see Section 3.24.300 of the Berkeley Municipal Code):

To appeal a decision of the Landmarks Preservation Commission to the City Council you must:

1. Submit a letter clearly and concisely setting forth the grounds for the appeal to the City Clerk, located at 2180 Milvia Street, 1st Floor, Berkeley. The City Clerk’s telephone number is (510) 981-6900.
a. Pursuant to BMC Section 3.24.300.A, an appeal may be taken to the City Council by the application of the owners of the property or their authorized agents, or by the application of at least fifty residents of the City aggrieved or affected by any determination of the commission made under the provisions of Chapter 3.24.

2. Submit the required fee (checks and money orders must be payable to ‘City of Berkeley’):
a. The basic fee for persons other than the applicant is $500. This fee may be reduced to $100 if the appeal is signed by persons who lease or own at least 50 percent of the parcels or dwelling units within 300 feet of the project site, or at least 25 such persons (not including dependent children), whichever is less. Signatures collected per the filing requirement in BMC Section 3.24.300.A may be counted towards qualifying for the reduced fee, so long as the signers are qualified. The individual filing the appeal must clearly denote which signatures are to be counted towards qualifying for the reduced fee.

Page 5 of 33 ends

Page 399 ends

LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION

NOTICE OF DECISION
#LMIN2023-0001
60 Panoramic Way
October 30, 2023

Page 4 of 5 ends

b. The fee for appeals of affordable housing projects (defined as projects which provide 50 percent or more affordable units for households earning 80% or less of Area Median Income) is $500, which may not be reduced.
c. The fee for all appeals by Applicants is $2500.

3. The appeal must be received prior to 5:00 p.m. on the "APPEAL PERIOD EXPIRATION" date shown above (if the close of the appeal period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the appeal period expires the following business day).

If no appeal is received, the Structure of Merit designation will be final on the first business day following expiration of the appeal period.

NOTICE CONCERNING YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS:

If you object to this decision, the following requirements and restrictions apply:

1. If you challenge this decision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Landmarks Preservation Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing.

2. You must appeal to the City Council within fifteen (15) days after the Notice of Decision of the action of the Landmarks Preservation Commission is mailed. It is your obligation to notify the Land Use Planning Division in writing of your desire to receive a Notice of Decision when it is completed.

3. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6(b) and Government Code Section 65009(c)(1), no lawsuit challenging a City Council decision, as defined by Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6(e), regarding a use permit, variance or other permit may be filed more than ninety (90) days after the date the decision becomes final, as defined in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6(b). Any lawsuit not filed within that ninety (90) day period will be barred.

4. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), notice is hereby given to the applicant that the 90-day protest period for any fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions included in any permit approval begins upon final action by the City, and that any challenge must be filed within this 90-day period.

5. If you believe that this decision or any condition attached to it denies you any reasonable economic use of the subject property, was not sufficiently related to a legitimate public purpose, was not sufficiently proportional to any impact of the project, or for any other reason constitutes a “taking” of property for public use without just compensation under the California or United States Constitutions, your appeal of this decision must include the following information:

A. That this belief is a basis of your appeal.

B. Why you believe that the decision or condition constitutes a "taking" of property as set forth above.

Page 6 of 33 ends

Page 400 ends

LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION

NOTICE OF DECISION
#LMIN2023-0001
60 Panoramic Way
October 30, 2023

Page 5 of 5 ends

C. All evidence and argument in support of your belief that the decision or condition constitutes a “taking” as set forth above.

If you do not do so, you will waive any legal right to claim that your property has been taken, both before the City Council and in court.

PUBLIC COMMENT:

Communications to Berkeley boards, commissions or committees are public record and will become part of the City’s electronic records, which are accessible through the City’s website.

Please note: e-mail addresses, names, addresses, and other contact information are not required, but if included in any communication to a City board, commission or committee, will become part of the public record. If you do not want your e-mail address or any other contact information to be made public, you may deliver communications via U.S. Postal Service or in person to the secretary of the relevant board, commission or committee. If you do not want your contact information included in the public record, please do not include that information in your communication. Please contact the secretary to the relevant board, commission or committee for further information.

FURTHER INFORMATION:

Questions about the project should be directed to the project planner, Reina Kapadia, at (510) 981-7410 or [email protected]. All project application materials may be viewed at the Permit Service Center (Zoning counter), 1947 Center Street, 3 rd Fl., during regular business hours.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Findings for Final Action

2. Landmark Application for 60 Panoramic Way, prepared by Jordan Kanarek (property owner); received March 9, 2023
ATTEST:

Fatema Crane, Secretary
Landmarks Preservation Commission
cc: City Clerk
Applicant and Property Owner: Jordan Kanarek and Gabrielle Goldstein, 60 Panoramic Way, Berkeley, CA 94704

Page 7 of 33 ends

Page 401 ends

A t t a c h m e n t 1 , p a r t 2
F i n d i n g s
JULY 6, 2023

60 Panoramic Way – William J. Moore House
Landmark application #LMIN2023-0001 for the consideration of City Landmark or Structure of Merit designation status for a residential building constructed in 1913 that is a Contributing Property to the Panoramic Hill National Register Historic District – APN 55-1853-15

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Structure of Merit designation of the property at 60 Panoramic Way, William J. Moore House.

CEQA FINDINGS

1. The project is found to be exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code §21000, et seq.) pursuant to Section 15061.b.3 of the CEQA Guidelines (activities that can be seen with certainty to have no significant effect on the environment).

LANDMARK PRESERVATION ORIDNANCE FINDINGS

2. Pursuant to Berkeley Municipal Code (BMC) Section 3.24.110.B.2(d) of the Landmarks Preservation Ordinance, the Commission finds that the subject property meets the designation criteria for Structure of Merit (SOM) status because the structure has historical significance to the City and/or to the structure’s neighborhood, block, street frontage, or group of buildings as a good example of the First Bay Tradition style of architecture, and as a contributor to the Panoramic Hill National Register Historic District.

The building retains integrity of location, materials, feeling, association, setting, workmanship, and design throughout its street-facing (primary) elevation, despite some exterior alterations on the side and rear elevations. Through these qualities, it conveys its associations with its period of construction (1913) and has historic significance to the City, neighborhood (Panoramic Hill), block, and group of buildings in the historic district in which it is located.

Page 8 of 33 ends

Page 402 ends

FINDINGS 60 Panoramic Way – William J. Moore House

Page 2 of 3 ends

FEATURES TO BE PRESERVED

1. This Structure of Merit designation shall apply to the subject property and the following distinguishing features of the main building and site shall be preserved:

Setting
 Its location in the Panoramic Hill residential neighborhood amongst the grouping of single-family residences built between 1901 – 1950 in various examples of the First Bay Tradition of architecture (National Register Historic District)
Overall Visual Aspects
 Two-and-a-half story over basement height of structure  Natural, unpainted, wood-shingled exterior wall cladding throughout  Those aspects of its design and materials associated with its First Bay Tradition style of architecture
West Elevation (Primary/Front)
Floor 1
 Inset entry porch
 Wooden entry door with inset panel and two flanking sidelights  Wooden French doors with divided light panels
 A square bay covered with wood shingle cladding and:
o Two double-hung wooden sash windows (8/1)
o One center double-hung wooden sash window (10/1)
Floor 2
 Two secondary hip roof overhangs between each floor with exposed rafter tails  Two three-part projecting bay windows with three double-hung wood sash windows in each:
o Two 1/1 windows in the central bays
o Four 6/1 windows on side bays
 Two casement windows with valance grid mullions (4/1) Floor 3 (Attic)
 Single double-hung wood sash window (1/0)
Basement
East Elevation (Rear)
 Wooden double undivided casement window
 Wooden French doors with divided light panels

Page 9 of 33 ends

Page 403 ends

FINDINGS 60 Panoramic Way – William J. Moore House

Page 3 of 3 ends

North Elevation (Side)
Floor 1
 One double-hung wood sash window (10/1)
 Three double-hung wood sash bay windows (1/1) underneath a hip roof overhang
 Two double-hung wood sash windows (towards the rear)
Floor 2
 Two double-hung wood sash windows (10/1)
South Elevation (Side)
Floor 2
 Four divided (3/1) picture windows
 Two divided (5/1) picture windows
Roof
 Front-facing gable roofline with exposed wooden roof beams with pyramidal rafter tail end
 Clinker brick chimney
 Beadboard soffits
Site Features
 Rhyolite (local volcanic) stone retaining walls and pilasters along the front property line and the south side property line as it returns into the sloped front yard
 Rhyolite (local volcanic) stone staircase (single flight) at the front property line leading up to the residence
 Rhyolite (local volcanic) stone planter beds in the sloped front yard

Page 10 of 33 ends

Page 404 ends

Planning and Development Department
Land Use Planning Division
City of Berkeley
Ordinance #4694 N.S.

LANDMARK APPLICATION
________________________________________________________________

1. Street Address
City Berkeley
County Alameda
Zip

2. Assessor's Parcel Number:

Block and Lot:

Tract:

Dimensions:

Cross Streets:

3. Is property on the State Historic Resource Inventory? Form #
Is property on the Berkeley Urban Conservation Survey?
Form #

4. Application for Landmark includes:
a. Building: Garden: Other features:
b. Landscape or Open Space: Natural Designed Oth er
c. Historic Site:
d. District:
e. Other:

5. Historic Name:

Commonly Known Name:

6. Date of Construction:
a. Factual: b. Approximate:

Source of Information:

7. Architect:

8. Builder:

9. Style:

Attachment 1, part 3

Page 11 of 33 ends

Page 405 ends

10. Original Owners:

Original Use:

11. Present Owners:

12. Present Use:

Residential: Single Family Duplex
Multiple
Commercial: Office Store Industrial Hotel
Institutional: School Hospital Other

Current Zoning:

Adjacent Property Zoning:

13. Present Condition of Property:

Exterior: Excellent Good Fair Poor
Interior: Excellent Good Fair Poor
Grounds: Excellent Good Fair Poor

Has the property's exterior been altered?

14. Description:

15. History:

Page 12 of 33 ends

Page 406 ends

16. Significance:

Historic Value:

National State County City Neighborho od

Architectural Value:

National State County City Neighborhood

17. Is the property endangered?

18. Photographs: Date: Repository:

Photographer:

19. Bibliography:

20. Recorder: Date:

Organization:

Page 13 of 33 ends

Page 407 ends

60 Panoramic Way Description + Building/Site Features
Description
In 2005 this home, and several other neighboring homes, was placed on the National Register of Historic Places (National Register Designation #05000424). The house at 60 Panoramic Way was designed and built by Henry Rowe, who purchased several contiguous lots on the hill and built ﬁve houses, including this one. The ﬁve houses, all Craftsman-styled, are distinct from each other, and this particular house was built in 1913.

The two and a half story single-family dwelling is situated on the uphill side of Panoramic Way, close to the ﬁrst hairpin turn. The exterior of the house is covered in natural wood shingles, with a front gabled roof that has overhanging eaves supported by exposed roof beams. The chimney is constructed of clinker brick. The ﬁrst story of the western facade includes a square bay with three double-hung windows and an inset entry porch. The front door has a vertical inset panel ﬂanked by side lites of non-original diamond-paned leaded glass. The second story features a pair of three-sided bay windows under a secondary hip-roof overhang. A stone retaining wall, made of local volcanic rhyolite and about four feet in height, wraps around the property line at the street, adjoining the retaining wall at 62 Panoramic Way. A ﬂight of steep stone steps leads to the wooden entry porch.

Over the years, this house has undergone several renovations and additions. In 1962, a basement apartment and bathroom were added, and it appears that this is when structural support piers and casement windows were installed at the front of the home. In 1980, a kitchen addition extended the rear ﬁrst ﬂoor into a roughly 5’x5’ portion of the rear patio to make room for a breakfast nook. In 1984, a multilevel garden designed by Jonathan Plant was constructed, and a redwood bridge was installed to create access to the garden from the second ﬂoor of the house. This design further enhances the house's connection to nature. Jonathan's work demonstrat es the power of thoughtful landscape design
in creating a harmonious living environment with this historic home.

In 2004, an attic conversion was completed, and skylights were added to the home, further enhancing its charm and livability.

Overall, this house is an excellent example of the Craftsman style and has undergone several renovations and additions that have enhanced its livability without compromising its historic character.

Page 14 of 33 ends

Page 408 ends

Site features
* = historic feature to be preserved
● Rhyolite stone retaining walls and staircase*
● Rhyolite stone planter beds*
● Decorative hand railing on stairs
● Timber retaining wall street-level at 58 Panoramic Way ● Fence and retaining wall at the south side of the property ● Terraced garden and patio at the rear of property
General building features
● Two Clinker brick chimneys*
● Blue painted window trim
● Wood shingles*
Western facade / Front features
Floor 1:
● A square bay consisting of
○ Two double-hung divided windows (8/0)*
○ One double-hung divided window (10/0) *
● Inset entry porch*
● Handrails
● Stained glass sidelight panels at both sides of door at entry porch ● French doors with divided panels*
● Two medium sized divided (4/1) picture windows*
Floor 2:
● Two double hung windows*
● Four divided (6/0) double hung windows*
● Secondary hip-roof overhang *
Floor 3/Attic:
● Double hung window*
Basement:
● Two sets of casement windows
● Structural support piers

Page 15 of 33 ends

Page 409 ends

Eastern facade/ Rear features
Floor 1:
● Exterior utility/storage closet with double doors.*
● Glass door
● Double hung window
● French doors with divided panels*
● One casement window*
Floor 2:
● Bridge connecting bedroom to second level of backyard ● Double hung window
● Door with divided windows
● Two divided sidelights (5) on either side of the patio door Floor 3/Attic:
● Double hung window
Northern facade features
Floor 1:
● One large double hung divided window (10/0)*
● Three double-hung window bay underneath a hip-roof overhang* ● Two double hung windows at rear*
Floor 2:
● Two large, double hung windows *
● One small, frosted, double hung divided (4/0) window
● One small, frosted, double hung window
Southern Facade features
Floor 1:

Page 16 of 33 ends

Page 410 ends

● Three double casement windows in a bay with divided panels under hip-roof overhang ● Two single casement windows with divided panels
Floor 2:
● Four divided (3/0) picture windows*
● Two divided (5/0) picture windows*

Page 17 of 33 ends

Page 411 ends

Stone retaining wall at the front of 60 Panoramic Way.

Page 18 of 33 ends

Page 412 ends

Front of 60 Panoramic Way.

Page 19 of 33 ends

Page 413 ends

North side of 60 Panoramic Way.

Page 20 of 33 ends

Page 414 ends

South side of 60 Panoramic Way.

Page 21 of 33 ends

Page 415 ends

South west corner, including bridge to patio.

Page 22 of 33 ends

Page 416 ends

North west corner, including bridge to patio.

Page 23 of 33 ends

Page 417 ends

NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018
(Oct. 1990) (7^C/
United States Department of the Interior
National Park Service
T National Register of Historic Places '
Registration Form
This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items.

1. Name of Property_____________________________________________________ historic name Panoramic Hill___________________________________________________ other names/site number University Terrace, University Hill________________________________

2. Location___________________________________________________________ street & number Panoramic Wy.Canvon Rd.Mosswood, Orchard Ln. Arden Rd. Q not for publication city or town Berkeley__________________________________CD vicinity state California code CA county Alameda code GO ( zip code 94704

3. State/Federal Agency Certification
As the designated au
D request for deterr
Historic Placeaand i
03 meets [H does n<
D statewide E3 pea
______ Sr-. A__,| ^^
Signature of certifyini
California Office of H
ihority under the National 1
nation of eligibility meets
eets the procedural ana p
meet the National Reast
y. ( D See continuation £
\JjT?-v\tw< £V/u-'-"
/official/Title
storic Preservation
Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this _3 nomination he documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of rofessional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property 3r Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant CU nationally heet for additional comments.)
Date
State or Federal agency and bureau
In my opinion, the property D meets D does not meet the National Register criteria. ( D See continuation sheet for additional comments.)
Signature of commenting or other official Date
State or Federal agency and bureau

4. National Park Service Certification
I hereby certify that this property is:

S-Q_aotered in the National Register
LS D See continuation sheet,
n determined eligible for the
National Register
D See continuation sheet.

D determined not eligible for the
National Register
n removed from the National
Register
D other (explain): ________
Date of Action

Page 24 of 33 ends

Page 418 ends

Panoramic Hill
Name or Property
Alameda, California
County and State

5. Classification
Ownership of Property
(Check as many boxes as apply)
£<] private
13 public-local
n public-State
n public-Federal
Category of Property
(Check only one&Wp | 1
D building(s)
13 district
Qsite
H] structure
n object
Number of Resources within Property
2QQ5(Do not include previously listed resources in the count.) Contributing Noncontributing
61 18 buildinas
sites
14 (roads, oaths,walls) 1 (wall) structures
1 (fountain) objects
76 19 Total
Name of related multiple property listing
(Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) N/A
Number of contributing resources previously listed in
the National Register

6. Function or Use
Historic Functions
(Enter categories from instructions)
Domestic - sinqle and multiple dwellings
Current Functions
(Enter categories from instructions)
Domestic - sinqle and multiple dwellings

7. Description
Architectural Classification
(Enter categories from instructions)
Shingle; Bungalow/Craftsman: Mission/Spanish
Colonial Revival: Beaux-Arts__________
Materials
(Enter categories from instructions)
foundation Earth, concrete
roof Shingle: Terra Gotta; Concrete
walls Shingle: Brick: Granite: Stucco: Concrete: Fabricrete other Brick: Iron: Copper: Ceramic Tile: Glass: Concrete:

Fabricrete
Narrative Description
(Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) See Continuation Sheets

Page 25 of 33 ends

Page 419 ends

Panoramic Hill Alameda. California
Name ot Property County and State

8. Statement of Significance
Applicable National Register Criteria
(Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property for National Register listing)
O A Property is associated with events that have made
a significant contribution to the broad patterns of
our history.

D B Property is associated with the lives of persons
significant in our past.
[X]C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or
represents the work of a master, or possesses high
artistic values, or represents a significant and
distinguishable entity whose components lack
individual distinction.

D D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield information important in prehistory or history.

Criteria Considerations
(Mark "X" in all the boxes that apply.)
Property is:

D A owned by a religious institution or used for
religious purposes.

D B removed from its original location.
n C a birthplace or a grave.

D D a cemetery.

D E a reconstructed building, object, or structure.
n F a commemorative property.

D G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance
within the past 50 years.

Areas of Significance
(Enter categories from instructions)
Arch itecture___________
Period of Significance
1901 -1950________
Significant Dates
Significant Person
(Complete if Criterion B is marked above)
Cultural Affiliation
Architect/Builder
Bernard. Mavbeck: Coxhead. Ernest: Morgan. Julia:_____
Steilberq. Walter. Ratcliff. Walter H.. Jr.; Thomas. John Hudson; Wright. Frank Lloyd: Atkins. Henry: Paine. Robert:

Ratcliff. Robert: Wurster. William.

Narrative Statement of Significance
(Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets.)

9. Major Bibliographical References
(Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) Previous documentation on file (NPS):

D preliminary determination of individual listing (36
CFR 67) has been requested.

D previously listed in the National Register
n previously determined eligible by the National
Register
D designated a National Historic Landmark
D recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey
#______________
n recorded by Historic American Engineering
Record # ______________
Primary Location of Additional Data
D State Historic Preservation Office
D Other State agency
n Federal agency
I3 Local government
£3 University
G3 Other
Name of repository:

See Continuation Sheet________

Page 26 of 33 ends

Page 420 ends

Panoramic Hill
Name or Property
Alameda. California
County and State

10. Geographical Data
Acreage of Property: 12.3 acres
UTM References
(Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet) Zone Easting Northing
1 10. 666060 4191480
2 10 660250 4191600
Zone
10 10
10 Easting Northing
666360 4191360
666170 4191210
666100 4191300
Verbal Boundary Description
(Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) Boundary Justification
(Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet.)

11. Form Prepared By
name/title Janice Thomas & Fredrica Drotos
organization __
street & number_
city or town__
Berkeley Architectural Heritage Association date November 8. 2004 37 Mosswood Road telephone. (510)549-1171
Berkeley state CA zip code 94704
Additional Documentation
Submit the following items with the completed form:

Continuation Sheets
Maps
A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location.

A Sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources.

Photographs
Representative black and white photographs of the property.

Additional items
(Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items)
Property Owner______________________________________________ (Complete this item at the request of the SHPO or FPO.) name ________________________________________________
street & number_
city or town__
telephone
state zip code
Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 etseq.).

Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Project (1024-0018), Washington, DC. 20503.

Page 27 of 33 ends

Page 421 ends

NPS Form 10-900-a QMS Approval No. 1024-0018
(8-86)
United States Department of the Interior
National Park Service
National Register of Historic Places
Continuation Sheet
Panoramic Hill, Alameda County, CA
Section number 7 Page 9
A two story, single family, wood shingle clad structure with a low-raking gable roof, broad eaves and projecting end beams atop a concrete foundation, follows an L-shaped plan. The home was built into a triangular lot inside the first hair-pin turn on Panoramic Way, with a very shallow setback on the uphill side and nestled in among redwood trees. Steilberg composed the home to conform to the setting so that the southern wall is angled away from what is now a tree stump but would have been a mature tree when the house was designed. On the western facade a second redwood was used in place of a decorative pillar holding up a trellis over the half round portico containing a rooftop terrace.

A stone retaining wall combines with a concrete retaining wall covered with wooden lattice curved to follow the contour of the hillside. Above the retaining wall is a terrace. A pergola gateway with wooden columns, tapering from bottom to top with hand carved cross braces, marks the entrance from the eastern side. The second story was designed in 1954 by architect Howard Moise although visual inspection does not reveal where the addition begins and ends. The house was later subdivided into two apartments with the entryway to one apartment on the eastern (uphill) side of the lot. The entryway is inset with a substantial wooden lintel where the original street number (#71) is carved. To the left of the entry is a window screened by six green glazed perforated Oriental tiles.

Additional fenestration includes two-lite casement windows placed asymmetrically. A north-east corner window configuration groups three windows per side separated by natural redwood vertical supports and two incised horizontal bands at the top. A large, mullioned bay window dominates the south-facing elevation. A red brick chimney is prominent on the northwest elevation. A single-car wood frame garage is wedged into the narrowest part of the lot at Panoramic Way's first hairpin turn.

Lattice work overlapping in squares atop wood siding gives the garage the appearance of an over- sized Japanese jewel box; the effect is enhanced by ochre glazed perforated Oriental tiles on the eastern side and similar tiles glazed "Steilberg-green" on the western side.

12. 60 Panoramic Way - TWO CONTRIBUTING: house
retaining wall (a)
Year built: 1913
Contractor: Rowe, Henry
Original owner: Moore, William J.

This two and one half story single-family dwelling is built on the uphill side of Panoramic Way near the first hairpin turn. The exterior is clad in natural wood shingle and topped by a front gabled roof with overhanging eaves which are supported by exposed roof beams. The chimney is clinker brick. On the first story of the western facade is a square bay with three double-hung windows consisting of multiple lites and an inset entry porch. The front door has a vertical inset panel flanked by side lites of diamond-paned leaded glass. The second story contains a pair of three-sided bay windows under a secondary hip-roof overhang. A stone retaining wall of local volcanic rhyolite about 4 feet in height wraps around the property line at the street, adjoining the retaining wall at 62 Panoramic Way. A flight of steep stone steps leads to the wooden entry porch.

Page 28 of 33 ends

Page 422 ends

Page 29 of 33 ends

Page 423 ends

Goldstein / Kanarek
Tel/Fax (510) 528-6368
Cell (510) 912-6931
[email protected]
1912 Vine Steet
Berkeley, CA 94709
guylubrotharchitect.com
Guy Lubroth, Architect60 Panoramic Way
Berlkeley, CA 94704

BASEMENT
PLAN
4/27/22
3/16"=1'-0"

(EXISTING)

REMODEL
Scale:

Date:

Title:

Project:

Revisions:
1 PROGRESS PRINT
Sk
Architect:
0' 5' 10' 20'

BASEMENT PLAN - (EXISTING)
1/4" = 1'-0"1
UP

Page 30 of 33 ends

Page 424 ends

Goldstein / Kanarek
Tel/Fax (510) 528-6368
Cell (510) 912-6931
[email protected]
1912 Vine Steet
Berkeley, CA 94709
guylubrotharchitect.com
Guy Lubroth, Architect60 Panoramic Way
Berlkeley, CA 94704
1ST FLOOR
PLAN
4/27/22
1/4"=1'-0"

(EXISTING)

REMODEL
Scale:

Date:

Title:

Project:

Revisions:
2 PROGRESS PRINT
Sk
Architect:
0' 5' 10' 20'
1ST FLOOR PLAN - (EXISTING)
1/4" = 1'-0"1
UP DN
DN

Page 31 of 33 ends

Page 425 ends

(EXISTING)

REMODEL
Scale:

Date:

Title:

Project:

Revisions:
3 PROGRESS PRINT
Sk
Architect:
0' 5' 10' 20'
2ND FLOOR PLAN - (EXISTING)
1/4" = 1'-0"1
UP
DN

Page 32 of 33 ends

Page 426 ends

Goldstein / Kanarek
Tel/Fax (510) 528-6368
Cell (510) 912-6931
[email protected]
1912 Vine Steet
Berkeley, CA 94709
guylubrotharchitect.com
Guy Lubroth, Architect60 Panoramic Way
Berlkeley, CA 94704

ATTIC FLOOR
PLAN
4/27/22
3/16"=1'-0"

(EXISTING)

REMODEL
Scale:

Date:

Title:

Project:

Revisions:
4 PROGRESS PRINT
Sk
Architect:
0' 5' 10' 20'

ATTIC FLOOR PLAN - (EXISTING)
1/4" = 1'-0"1

Page 33 of 33 ends

Page 427 ends

Page 428 ends

INTRODUCTION
The attached Landmarks Preservation Commission Notice of Decision (NOD) is presented to the Mayor and City Council pursuant to Berkeley Municipal Code/Landmarks Preservation Ordinance (BMC/LPO) Section 3.24.240.A, which requires that “a copy of the Notice of Decision shall be filed with the City Clerk and the City Clerk shall present said copy to the City Council at its next regular meeting.”

CURRENT SITUATION AND ITS EFFECTS
The Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC/Commission) has approved a Structural Alteration Permit (SAP) for the subject City Landmark property. This action is subject to a 15-day appeal period that began on October 31, 2023, after being postponed from August 29, 2023.

BACKGROUND
BMC/LPO Section 3.24.300 allows City Council to review any action of the Landmarks Preservation Commission in granting or denying a Structural Alteration Permit. For Council to review the decision on its merits, Council must appeal the Notice of Decision.

To do so, a Council member must move this Information Item to Action and then move to set the matter for hearing on its own. Such action must be taken within 15 days of the mailing of the Notice of Decision, or by November 14, 2023. Such certification to Council shall stay all proceedings in the same manner as the filing of an appeal.

If the Council chooses to appeal the action of the Commission, then a public hearing will be set. The Council must then rule on the designation within 30 days of closing the hearing, otherwise the decision of the Commission is automatically deemed affirmed.

Unless the Council wishes to review the determination of the Commission and make its own decision, the attached NOD is deemed received and filed.

At their meeting on September 12, 2023, City Council received an Information Report citing this LPC decision and announcing the conclusion of the 15-day appeal period.

Page 1 of 32 ends

Page 429 ends

LPO NOD: 803 Delaware Street/#LMSAP2023-0002 INFORMATION CALENDAR November 21, 2023

Page 2 ends

However, staff postponed the appeal period to commence on October 31, 2023 in order to correct a clerical oversight in the distribution of the public notices.

POSSIBLE FUTURE ACTION
The Council may choose to appeal the decision, in which case it would conduct a public hearing at a future date.

FISCAL IMPACTS OF POSSIBLE FUTURE ACTION
There are no known fiscal impacts associated with this action.

CONTACT PERSON
Fatema Crane, Principal Planner, Planning and Development Department, 510-981- 7410
Attachments:
1: Notice of Decision – 803 Delaware Street, #LMSAP2023-0002

Page 2 of 32 ends

Page 430 ends

Attachment 1, part 1

L A N D M A R K S

P R E S E R V A T I O N

C O M M I S S I O N
N o t i c e o f D e c i s i o n
DATE OF BOARD DECISION: July 6, 2023
DATE NOTICE MAILED: August 28, 2023October 30, 2023
APPEAL PERIOD EXPIRATION: September 12, 2023November 14, 2023 EFFECTIVE DATE OF PERMIT (Barring Appeal or Certification): September 13, 2023November 15, 20231
803 Delaware Street – Delaware Historic
District
Structural Alteration Permit #LMSAP2023-0002 to legalize one projecting sign and two site lights on the exterior of a designated City Landmark within a designated historic district.

The Landmarks Preservation Commission of the City of Berkeley, after conducting a public hearing, APPROVED the following request:
 Structural Alteration Permit
APPLICANT: Amber Baker, Project Architect
Gunkel Architecture
1295 59 th Street
Emeryville, CA 94608
ZONING DISTRICT: Mixed Use Residential (M-UR)
1 Pursuant to BMC Chapter 3.24, the City Council may “certify” any decision of the LPC for review, which has the same effect as an appeal. In most cases, the Council must certify the LPC decision during the 14-day appeal period. However, pursuant to BMC Section 1.04.070, if any portion of the appeal period falls within a Council recess, the deadline for Council certification is suspended until the first Council meeting after the recess, plus the number of days of the appeal period that occurred during the recess, minus one day. If there is no appeal or certification, the Use Permit becomes effective the day after the certification deadline has passed.

Page 3 of 32 ends

Page 431 ends

LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION

NOTICE OF DECISION
#LMSAP2023-0002
803 Delaware Street
October 30, 2023

Page 2 of 5 ends

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS: Categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Section 15331 of the CEQA Guidelines for Historical Resource Rehabilitation.
.

FINDINGS FOR FINAL ACTION AND APPROVED PLANS ARE ATTACHED TO THIS NOTICE
COMMISSION VOTE: 8-0-0-1
YES: ADAMS, CRANDALL, ENCHILL, FINACOM, LEUSCHNER, MONTGOMERY,

SCHWARTZ, TWU
NO: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: LINVILL
TO APPEAL THIS DECISION (see Section 3.24.300 of the Berkeley Municipal Code):

To appeal a decision of the Landmarks Preservation Commission to the City Council you must:

Page 4 of 32 ends

Page 432 ends

LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION

NOTICE OF DECISION
#LMSAP2023-0002
803 Delaware Street
October 30, 2023

Page 3 of 5 ends

qualifying for the reduced fee, so long as the signers are qualified. The individual filing the appeal must clearly denote which signatures are to be counted towards qualifying for the reduced fee.
b. The fee for appeals of affordable housing projects (defined as projects which provide 50 percent or more affordable units for households earning 80% or less of Area Median Income) is $500, which may not be reduced.
c. The fee for all appeals by Applicants is $2500.

If no appeal is received, the landmark permit will be final on the first business day following expiration of the appeal period.

NOTICE CONCERNING YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS:

If you object to this decision, the following requirements and restrictions apply:

A. That this belief is a basis of your appeal.

Page 5 of 32 ends

Page 433 ends

LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION

NOTICE OF DECISION
#LMSAP2023-0002
803 Delaware Street
October 30, 2023

Page 4 of 5 ends

B. Why you believe that the decision or condition constitutes a "taking" of property as set forth above.

C. All evidence and argument in support of your belief that the decision or condition constitutes a “taking” as set forth above.

If you do not do so, you will waive any legal right to claim that your property has been taken, both before the City Council and in court.

PUBLIC COMMENT:

Communications to Berkeley boards, commissions or committees are public record and will become part of the City’s electronic records, which are accessible through the City’s website.

FURTHER INFORMATION:

Questions about the project should be directed to the project planner, Desiree Dougherty, at (510) 981-7431 or [email protected]. All project application materials, including full- size plans, may be viewed at the Permit Service Center (Zoning counter), 1947 Center Street, 3rd Fl., during regular business hours.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Findings for Final Action

2. Project Plans, received FEBRUARY 28, 2023
ATTEST:

Fatema Crane, Secretary
Landmarks Preservation Commission
cc: City Clerk
Applicant: Amber Baker, Architect,
Gunkel Architecture, 1295 59 th Street, Emeryville, CA 94608 Property Owner: Sharon Block and Selim Aykiran, 803 Delaware Street, Berkeley,

Page 6 of 32 ends

Page 434 ends

LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION

NOTICE OF DECISION
#LMSAP2023-0002
803 Delaware Street
October 30, 2023

Page 5 of 5 ends

CA 94710

Page 7 of 32 ends

Page 435 ends

A t t a c h m e n t 1, Part 2
Findings and Condition s
July 6, 2023
1947 Center Street, Berkeley, CA 94704 Tel: 510.981.7410 TDD: 510.981.7474 Fax: 510.981.7420

FINDINGS REQUIRED UNDER CEQA

1. The project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code §21000, et seq. and California Code of Regulations, §15000, et seq.) pursuant to Section 15331 of the CEQA Guidelines (“Historic Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation”). Furthermore, none of the exceptions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply, as follows: (a) the site is not located in an environmentally sensitive area, (b) there are no cumulative impacts, (c) there are no significant effects, (d) the project is not located near a scenic highway, and (e) the project site is not located on a hazardous waste site pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5.

FINDINGS RELATED TO THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR’S STANDARDS Regarding the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards (SOI) for Rehabilitation, the Landmarks Preservation Commission of the City of Berkeley makes the following findings:

1. The proposed project does not require a change of use. The property will retain its historic commercial use.

2. The project will retain the historic character of the property and will avoid removal of distinctive materials and the alteration of features that characterize the property.

3. The new signage, site lighting, and rear egress door upgrades will not resemble or replicate designs from the property’s historic period. These new features are contemporary and will not result in a false sense of historical development.

4. Changes to the property that may have acquired significance in their own right are not affected by this project.

5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques, or examples of craftsmanship that characterize this proper
ty, such as display windows, transom, trim
detailing and recessed entry will be substantially retained and preserved with this project.

6. As conditioned herein, if deteri
orated historic features will be affected by this request, then they would be repaired or replaced to match the materials, design, and finishes of the original items

7. The applicant does not propose chemical or physical treatments. However, standard conditions of Structural Alteration Permit approval would require any chemical or physical treatments to be undertaken using the gentlest means possible.

Page 8 of 32 ends

Page 436 ends

803 DELAWARE STREET Findings and Conditions

Page 2 of 7 ends

8. The project does not have the potential to affect any archaeological resources because the applicant proposes no excavation.

9. The proposed upgrades are designed with complimentary, high-quality materials in simplified, contemporary style employing colors and finishes that harmonize with the historic design elements of the building. Owing to these aspects, new work will be sufficiently differentiated from the historic design.

10. If the proposed improvements were removed in the future, they would not permanently impair the integrity or essential form of the subject building.

FINDINGS REQUI

RED UNDER LANDMARKS PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

1. As required by Section 3.24.260 of the Landmarks Preservation Ordinance, the Commission finds that the proposed work is appropriate for and consistent with the purposes of the Ordinance, and will preserve the characteristics and features specified in the designation for this property. Specifically:

A. The proposed project will not adversely affect the architectural design of the City Landm
ark in the Delaware Historic District, located in the 800 block of Delawar e Street. It proposes the legalization of one projecting sign and two site lights installed on the South (Delaware Street) façade, and accessible upgrades to the egress door at the rear (north) of the building.

B. The special character of the subject property may lie in its large display windows with classic detailing and simple trim design. This project would not adversely affect these qualities because the sign and light fixtures are mounted in such a way that fits with the architectural features of the building. The rear egress door would not alter any character defining features.

Page 9 of 32 ends

Page 437 ends

803 DELAWARE STREET Findings and Conditions

Page 3 of 7 ends

STANDARD CONDITIONS

The following conditions, as well as all other applicable provisions of the Landmarks Preservation Ordinance, apply to this Permit:

1. Conditions Shall be Printed on Plans
The conditions of this Permit shall be printed on the second sheet of each plan set submitted for a building permit pursuant to this Permit, under the title ‘Structural Alteration Permit Conditions’. Additional sheets may also be used if the second sheet is not of sufficient size to list all of the conditions. The sheet(s) containing the conditions shall be of the same size as those sheets containing the construction drawings; 8- 1/2” by 11” sheets are not acceptable.

2. Plans and Representations Become Conditions
Except as specified herein, the site plan, floor plans, building elevations and/or any additional information or representations, whether oral or written, indicating the proposed structure or manner of operation submitted with an application or during the approval process are deemed conditions of approval.

3. Subject to All Applicable Laws and Regulations
The approved use and/or construction is subject to, and shall comply with, all applicable City Ordinances and laws and regulations of other governmental agencies. Prior to construction, the applicant shall identify and secure all applicable permits from the Zoning Adjustments Board or Zoning Officer, Building and Safety Division, Public Works Department and other affected City divisions and departments.

4. Exercise and Lapse of Permits
A. A permit for the construction of a building or structure is deemed exercised when a valid City building permit, if required, is issued, and construction has lawfully commenced.

B. A permit may be declared lapsed and of no further force and effect if it is not exercised within one year of its issuance, except that permits for construction or alteration of structures or buildings may not be declared lapsed if the permittee has: (1) applied for a building permit; or, (2) made substantial good faith efforts to obtain a building permit and begin construction, even if a building permit has not been issued and/or construction has not begun.

5. Indemnification Agreement
The applicant shall hold harmless, defend, and indemnify the City of Berkeley and its officers, agents, and employees against any and all liability, damages, claims, demands, judgments or other losses (including without limitation, attorney’s fees, expert witness and consultant fees and other litigation expenses), referendum or initiative relating to, resulting from or caused by, or alleged to have resulted from, or caused by, any action or approval associated with the project. The indemnity includes without limitation, any legal or administrative challenge, referendum or initiative filed or prosecuted to overturn,

Page 10 of 32 ends

Page 438 ends

803 DELAWARE STREET Findings and Conditions

Page 4 of 7 ends

set aside, stay or otherwise rescind any or all approvals granted in connection with the Project, any environmental determination made for the project and granting any permit issued in accordance with the project. This indemnity includes, without limitation, payment of all direct and indirect costs associated with any action specified herein. Direct and indirect costs shall include, without limitation, any attorney’ s fees, expert witness and consultant fees, court costs, and other litigation fees. City shall have the right to select counsel to represent the City at Applicant’s expense in the defense of any action specified in this condition of approval. City shall take reasonable steps to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, demand, or legal actions that may create a claim for indemnification under these conditions of approval.

6. Halt Work/Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultural Resources In the event that cultural resources of Native American origin are identified during construction, all work within 50 feet of the discovery shall be redirected. The project applicant and project construction contractor shall notify the City Planning Department within 24 hours. The City will again contact any tribes who have requested consultation under AB 52, as well as contact a qualified archaeologist, to evaluate the resources and situation and provide recommendations. If it is determined that the resource is a tribal cultural resource and thus significant under CEQA, a mitigation plan shall be prepared and implemented in accordance with State guidelines and in consultation with Native American groups. If the resource cannot be avoided, additional measures to avoid or reduce impacts to the resource and to address tribal concerns may be required.

7. Archaeological Resources
(Ongoing throughout demolition, grading, and/or construction)

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f), “provisions for historical or unique archaeological resources accidentally discovered during construction” should be instituted.

Therefore:

A. In the event that any prehistoric or historic subsurface cultural resources are discovered during ground disturbing activities, all work within 50 feet of the resources shall be halted and the project applicant and/or lead agency shall consult with a qualified archaeologist, historian or paleontologist to assess the significance of the find.

B. If any find is determined to be significant, representatives of t he project proponent and/or lead agency and the qualified professional would meet to determine the appropriate avoidance measures or other appropriate measure, with the ultimate determination to be made by the City of Berkeley. All significant cultural mat erials recovered shall be subject to scientific analysis, professional museum curation, and/or a report prepared by the qualified professional according to current professional standards.

C. In considering any suggested measure proposed by the qualified professional, the project applicant shall determine whether avoidance is necessary or feasible in light of factors such as the uniqueness of the find, project design, costs, and other considerations.

D. If avoidance is unnecessary or infeasible, other appropriate measures (e.g., data recovery) shall be instituted. Work may proceed on other parts of the project site while mitigation measures for cultural resources is carried out.

Page 11 of 32 ends

Page 439 ends

803 DELAWARE STREET Findings and Conditions

Page 5 of 7 ends

E. If significant materials are recovered, the qualified professional shall prepare a report on the findings for submittal to the Northwest Information Center.

8. Human Remains (Ongoing throughout demolition, grading, and/or construction)

In the event that human skeletal remains are uncovered at the project site during ground- disturbing activities, all work shall immediately halt and the Alameda County Coroner shall be contacted to evaluate the remains, and following the procedures and protocols pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 (e)(1) . If the County Coroner determines that the remains are Native American, the City shall contact the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(c), and all excavation and site preparation activities shall cease within a 50- foot radius of the find until appropriate arrangements are made. If the agencies determine that avoidance is not feasible, then an alternative plan shall be prepared with specific steps and timeframe required to resume construction activities. Monitoring, data recovery, determin ation of significance and avoidance measures (if applicable) shall be completed expeditiously.

9. Paleontological Resources (Ongoing throughout demolition, grading, and/or construction)

In the event of an unanticipated discovery of a paleontological resource during construction, excavations within 50 feet of the find shall be temporarily halted or diverted until the discovery is examined by a qualified paleontologist (per Society of Verte brate Paleontology standards [SVP 1995,1996]). The qualified paleontologist shall document the discovery as needed, evaluate the potential resource, and assess the significance of the find. The paleontologist shall notify the appropriate agencies to determine procedures that would be followed before construction is allowed to resume at the location of the find. If the City determines that avoidance is not feasible, the paleontologist shall prepare an excavation plan for mitigating the effect of the project on the qualities that make the resource important, and such plan shall be implemented. The plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval.

ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
The following additional conditions are attached to this Permit:

10. No changes can be made to these approved plans without pri or approval.

11. CITY PERMITS. This Structural Alteration Permit (SAP) approval is contingent upon approval of the requisite Use Permit and Public Work Permit for the project scope.

12. PLA
NS COMPLIANCE. Construction and building permit plans shall substantially conform to the Structural Alteration Permit (SAP) project plans dated/received February 28, 2023.

13. REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF CHARACTER-DEFINI
NG FEATURES.

Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old or historic feature in design, color, texture, and, where possible,

Page 12 of 32 ends

Page 440 ends

803 DELAWARE STREET Findings and Conditions

Page 6 of 7 ends

materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence.

14. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials shall not be used.

15. COLORS. Prior to Landmarks plan checker sign-off of the Building Permit set of drawings, the applicant shall submit color and materials information for review and approval by Landmarks staff, in coordination with the LPC Chair as needed.

16. CLEAR GLASS. All glass is assumed to be clear glass. Any proposed glass that is not clear glass, or includes signage, shall be indicated on all drawings, and shall be reviewed for approval by Landmarks staff.

17. DETAILS. Prior to Landmarks plan checker sign-off of the Building Permit set of drawings, the applicant shall submit sign, light fixture, double door, and transom details for review and approval by the Landmarks plan checker.

18. SIGNAGE. Prior to Landmarks plan checker sign-off of the building permit set of drawings, the applicant shall submit complete signage details, including colors, materials, letter heights, dimensions, placement on building, and installation details. All materials will be matte unless otherwise noted. All non-temporary signage and awnings not previously approved and not listed in this application are prohibited.

19. LIGHTING. Prior to Landmarks plan checker sign-off of the building permit set of drawings, the applicant shall submit lighting details showing all existing and proposed site and building lighting. Exterior lighting, including for signage, shall be downcast and not cause glare on the public right-of-way and adjacent parcels.

Existing light fixtures shall either be replaced or refinished with a matte or flat finish.

20. The applicant shall be responsible for identifying and securing all applicable permits from the Building and Safety Division and all other affected City divisions/departments prior to the start of work.

21. The applicant is responsible for complying with all the above conditions. Failure to comply with any condition could result in construction work being stopped, issuance of citations, as well as further review by the Landmarks staff, which may modify or impose additional conditions, or revoke approval.

22. All building permit drawings and subsequent construction shall substantially conform to the approved plans as outlined in Condition #1. Any modifications must be reviewed by the Landmarks plan checker to determine whether the modification requires approval.

23. The applicant shall hold harmless, defend, and indemnify the City of Berkeley and its officers, agents, and employees against any and all liability, damages, claims, demands, judgments or other losses (including without limitation, attorney’s fees, expert witness and consultant fees and other litigation expenses), referendum or initiative relating to, resulting from or caused by, or alleged to have resulted from, or caused by, any action or approval associated with the project. The indemnity includes without limitation, any

Page 13 of 32 ends

Page 441 ends

803 DELAWARE STREET Findings and Conditions

Page 7 of 7 ends

legal or administrative challenge, referendum or initiative filed or prosecuted to overturn, set aside, stay or otherwise rescind any or all approvals granted in connection with the Project, any environmental determination made for the project and granting any permit issued in accordance with the project. This indemnity includes, without limitation, payment of all direct and indirect costs associated with any action specified herein. Direct and indirect costs shall include, without limitation, any attorney’s fees, expert witness and consultant fees, court costs, and other litigation fees. City shall have the right to select counsel to represent the City at Applicant’s expense in the defense of any action specified in this condition of approval. City shall take reasonable steps to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, demand, or legal actions that may create a claim for indemnification under these conditions of approval.

Page 14 of 32 ends

Page 442 ends

A0.0

TITLE SHEET

PROJECT TEAM

SHEET INDEX

GUNKEL ARCHITECTURE
2295 SAN PABLO AVENUE
BERKELEY, CA, 94702
(510) 984-1112
PROJECT MANAGER: AMBER BAKER
[email protected]

SHARON BLOCK & SALIM AYKIRAN

TURKISH TOWEL COMPANY
803 DELAWARE STREET
BERKELEY, CA 94710
[email protected]

RETAIL TENANT

IMPROVEMENT

SYMBOLS

CODE COMPLIANCE
HEIGHT

DESCRIPTION OF WORK
2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (INCORPORATES BY ADOPTION AND REPRINTS THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE WITH CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS. PUBLISHED BY

THE INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL, ICC)
2019 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE - APPLIES TO ONE AND TWO FAMILY HOUSES AND TOWNHOMES LESS THAN 3 STORIES IN HEIGHT. (INCORPORATES BY ADOPTION AND REPRINTS THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE.)
2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE - CHECK THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION'S WEBSITE AT HTTP://WWW.ENERGY.CA.GOV FOR A DOWNLOADABLE VERSION. (PUBLISHED BY ICC).
2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (INCORPORATES BY ADOPTION AND REPRINTS THE 2017 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE WITH CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS. PUBLISHED BY THE

NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION AGENCY, NFPA)
2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (INCORPORATES BY ADOPTION AND REPRINTS THE 2018 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE WITH CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS. PUBLISHED BY THE

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS, IAPMO) 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (INCORPORATES BY ADOPTION AND REPRINTS THE 2018 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE WITH CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS. PUBLISHED BY

THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS, IAPMO) 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE (INCORPORATES BY ADOPTION AND REPRINTS THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE WITH CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS. PUBLISHED BY ICC) 2019 CALGREEN CODE - APPLIES TO CERTAIN NEW BUILDINGS ONLY - ALL NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS 3 STORIES OR LESS AND ALL NEW NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS.

HERS VERIFICATION REQUIRED BY T-24 ENERGY REPORT.

ASSESSOR'S MAP
TENANT IMPROVEMENT WITH MINOR STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT TO RETAIL SPACE.

A
A
1 AX.XX
1 +0'-0"
A.F.F.
1 1
AX.XX
1 AX.XX

SECTION

EXTERIOR ELEVATION
803 DELAWARE ST., BERKELEY, CA 94710
OWNER

PROJECT INFORMATION

VICINITY MAP

ARCHITECT
DETAIL

GRIDLINE

DEMOLITION NOTE

IMPROVEMENT NOTE

WALL TAG

ARCHITECTURAL
SHEET

NUMBERSHEET NAME

BUILDING
A0.0 TITLE SHEET●
A0.1 GENERAL NOTES & ABBREVIATIONS●
A0.2TITLE-24●
A0.3 TITLE-24●
A0.4 TITLE-24●
A0.5TITLE-24●
A0.6 TITLE-24●
A0.7 TITLE-24●
A1.0 EXISTING SITE PLAN●
A2.0 EXISTING FIRST FLOOR & DEMO PLAN●
A2.1 IMPROVEMENT FLOOR PLAN●
A2.1 IMPROVEMENT BUILDING PLAN - FIRST FLOOR●
A2.2 IMPROVEMENT RCP●
A3.0 EXISTING AND IMPROVEMENT ELEVATIONS●
A4.0 DETAILS●
A4.1 ACCESSIBILITY DETAILS●
S1 STRUCTURAL NOTES●
S2 FOUNDATION SHEAR WALLS & FOUNDATION DETAILS●
S3 STEEL MOMENT FRAMING DETAILS●
PARCEL:57-2098-46
ZONING:MUR
LOT SIZE:RETAIL CONDO UNIT WITHIN LOT
SPRINKLERS:NONE - NO CHANGE
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VB (NO CHANGE)
OCCUPANCY:M = RETAIL CONDO (NO CHANGE)
(E) HEIGHT:+27'-0"
PROPOSED HEIGHT:
(E) STORIES:2 STORIES
PROPOSED STORIES:2 STORIES (NO CHANGE)
(E) PARKING:SHARED LOT IN CONDO
(N) PARKING PROVIDED:NONE - NO CHANGE

NO CHANGE

BUILDING PERMIT
DATE 10/06/22 5(7A,/
5(129A7,21
803 DELAWARE STREET
BERKELEY, CA 94710

JEDCO COUNSULTING ENGINEERS
1000 CONTRA COSTA DRIVE
EL CERRITO, CA 94530
(510) 703-0095
ENGINEER: FIRAS A. JANDALI
[email protected]

STRUCTURAL

BRIGHT GREEN STRATEGIES
820 DELAWARE STREET
BERKELEY, CA 94710

SHARON BLOCK
(510) 863-1109
[email protected]

ENERGY CALCULATIONS DRAWING NOTES
TYPICAL OWNER/DEVELOPER BUILDING PERMIT SET OF DRAWINGS:

THESE DRAWINGS ARE INTENDED FOR BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL AND

ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE A COMPREHENSIVE SET OF DRAWINGS

INDICATING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS, WATER PROOFING, SPECIFIC

FINISHES, SPECIFIC CABINETRY, SPECIFIC PLUMBING FIXTURES, LIGHTING FIXTURES, SPECIFIC DOORS, WINDOWS, & HARDWARE, OR M.E.P. & UTILITY ROUTING. OWNER/DEVELOPER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SELECTION OF

THESE ITEMS AND CLARIFICATION AND COORDINATION OF THESE WITH

THE CONTRACTOR AS PART OF THE BUILDING CONTRACT AND
CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFIRMING

CODE COMPLIANCE OF ALL WORK NOT FULLY REFLECTED IN THESE

DOCUMENTS AS WELL AS ANY REVISIONS TO THIS SCOPE WITH THE ENTITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR

PROVIDING A COMPLETE, STRUCTURALLY SOUND, FULLY OPERATIONAL,

CODE COMPLIANT, FINISHED WORK WITH COMPLETE PROTECTION
AGAINST ELEMENTS.

1. DURING CONSTRUCTION SITE OR AREA MUST BE CLEANED UP AT THE END OF THE DAY IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FIREFIGHTER ACCESS IN THE BUILDING IN AN EVENT OF A FIRE.

2. 2. COMBUSTIBLE DEBRIS SHALL NOT BE ACCUMULATED WITHIN THE BUILDING. COMBUSTIBLE DEBRIS,

RUBBISH AND WASTE MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM BUILDINGS AT THE END OF EACH WORK SHIFT [CFC §330.4.2.4]

3. MATERIALS SUSCEPTIBLE TO SPONTANEOUS IGNITION, SUCH AS OILY RAGS, SHALL BE STORED IN A LISTED DISPOSAL CONTAINER [CFC §330.4.2.4]

4. OPERATIONS INVOLVING THE USE OF CUTTING AND WELDING SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CFC §3304.6.

FIRE SAFETY DURING CONSTRUCTION
TOTAL AREA OF BUILDING1,754 SF
AREA OF WORK780 SF (INTERIOR TENANT IMPROVEMENT)
BUILDING FOOTPRINT869 SF
ITEM 9 - ATTACHMENT 2
LPC 07-06-2023

Page 1 of 18 ends

Attachment 1, part 3

Page 15 of 32 ends

Page 443 ends

A0.1

GENERAL

NOTES &

ABBREVIATIONS

ANCHOR BOLT
ABOVE

ASPHALTIC CONCRETE

ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE

AIR CONDITIONING

ACOUSTICAL

AREA DRAIN

ADMINISTRATION

ADJUSTABLE

ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR

AGGREGRATE

ALUMINUM

ALTERNATE

ACCESS PANEL

APPLICATION

APPROXIMATE

ARCHITECTURAL

ASPHALT

ATTENUATING
BOARD

BETWEEN

BRACED FRAME

BUILDING

BLOCKING
BEAM
BOTTOM

CABINET

CENTER TO CENTER
CEMENT

CERAMIC

CUBIC FEET

CHANNEL

CAST IRON

CONTROL JOINT

CENTERLINE

CEILING

CAULKING
CLOSET
CLEAR

CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT
COLUMN

COMPUTER

CONCRETE

CONFERENCE

CONTINUOUS

CONTRACTOR

CONSTRUCTION

CORRIDOR
CARPET

COLD-ROLLED

CASEMENT

CERAMIC TILE
CENTER

COUNTERSUNK

CUBIC YARDS
DRYER
DOUBLE

DECKING
DEGREE

DEMOLITION

DEPARTMENT
DETAIL

DRINKING FOUNTAIN

DIAMETER

DIMENSION

DIRECTION

DISPOSAL

DISTRIBUTION

DIVISION
DOWN
DOOR

DOWNSPOUT

DIVISION OF STATE

ARCHITECT

DRY STAND PIPE

DRAWING
EAST

EXISTING
EACH

EXPANSION JOINT

ELEVATION

ELASTOMERIC

ELECTRICAL

ELEVATOR

EMERGENCY

ENCLOSURE

ENGINEER
EQUAL

EQUIPMENT

EACH SIDE

EXPANSION

EXHAUST

EXISTING

EXTERIOR

EACH WAY

FREEZER

FIRE ALARM

FORCED AIR FURNACE

FLOOR DRAIN

FOUNDATION

FIRE EXTINGUISHER

FIRE EXTINGUISHER &

CABINET

FEDERAL

FIELD VERIFY

FINISH FLOOR

FIRE HOSE CABINET
FINISH

FIXTURE

FLOW LINE
FLOOR

FLUORESCENT

FACE OF

FACE OF CONCRETE

FACE OF FINISH

FACE OF MASONRY

FACE OF STUD

FACE OF WALL

FIREPROOF(ING)

FRAMING

FIRE RETARDANT TREATED

FIBERGLASS REINFORCED

POLYESTER

FLOOR SINK

FOOD SERVICE EQUIPMENT

FOOT OR FEET

FOOTING

FURRING
FUTURE
GAUGE

GALVANIZED

GLUE- LAMINATED (WOOD)
BEAM
GLASS
GROUND

GLASS REINFORCED
GYPSUM

GALVANIZED SHEET METAL
GYPSUM

GYPSUM WALL BOARD

HOSE BIBB

HOLLOW CORE

HARDWARE

HARDWOOD
HEIGHT

HOLLOW METAL

HORIZONTAL

HIGH POINT

HEATING, VENTILATING,

AIR CONDITIONING

INSIDE DIAMETER
INCH

INCANDESCENT

INCREMENT

INFORMATION

INSULATION

INTERIOR

JANITOR
JOIST
JOINT

KITCHEN

KICK PL

LABORATORY

LAMINATE

LAVATORY
POUND

LINEAR FEET

LEFT HAND
LINEAR
LOCKER

LONG LEG HORIZONTAL

LOW POINT
LIGHT
LOUVER

MACHINE

MAINTENANCE

MATERIAL

MASONRY

MAXIMUM
MARKER BOARD or

MACHINE BOLT

MEDICINE CABINET

MECHANICAL

MEMBRANE

MECHANICAL/ ELECTRICAL
& PLUMBING
METAL

MANUFACTURER

MICROWAVE/ TOASTER
OVEN

MINIMUM
MIRROR

MISCELLANEOUS
MARK

MASONRY OPENING

MOUNTED
METAL

MULLION
NORTH
NEW

NOT APPLICABLE

NORTHEAST

NOT IN CONTRACT
NUMBER

NOMINAL

NOT TO SCALE

NORTHWEST

OBSCURE

ON CENTER
OUTSIDE DIAMETER or

DIMENSION

OWNER FURNISHED,

CONTRACTOR INSTALLED

OVERFLOW DRAIN

OVERFLOW SCUPPER

OVER HEAD

OPENING

OPPOSITE HAND
OUNCE

PLANTING AREA

PANIC BAR

PRECAST CONCRETE PANEL

PERIMETER
PLATE

PLATE GLASS

PLASTIC LAMINATE

PLASTER

PLUMBING

PLYWOOD
PANEL
PAIR

PREPARATION

POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT

POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH

PRESSURE TREATED
POINT

PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER

PARTITION

POLYVINYL CHLORIDE

PAVEMENT

RISER OR REFRIGERATOR
REMOVE

RETURN AIR
RADIUS

RUBBER BASE

REFLECTED CEILING PLAN

ROOF DRAIN
REF./REFERENCE

REFRIGERATOR

REFRIGERATION

REINFORCED

REQUIRED

REVISION OR REVISED

RESILIENT

RIGHT HAND
ROOM

ROUGH OPENING

REDWOOD

RAINWATER LEADER
SOUTH

SUPPLY AIR

SCOREBOARD

SOLID CORE

SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS

SCHEDULE

STORM DRAIN

SEE DOOR SCHEDULE

SOUTHEAST

SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS

SECTION

SQUARE FOOT (FEET)

SEE (ROOM) FINISH

SCHEDULE

SEE GLAZING SCHEDULE
SHEET

SHEATHING

SIMILAR

SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS

SHEET METAL
SLOPE

SHEET METAL AND AIR

CONDITIONING

CONTRACTORS NATIONAL

ASSOCIATION

SEE MECHANICAL

DRAWINGS

SHEET METAL SCREW

SANITARY NAPKIN

DISPENSER

SANITARY NAPKIN

RECEPTACLE

SLAB ON GRADE

SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS

SPECIFICATION

SPRINKLERED

SEE PARTITION SCHEDULE
SQUARE

SEE STRUCTURAL

DRAWINGS

STANDARD
STEEL

STRUCTURAL

SURFACE FOUR SIDES

SURFACE TWO SIDES

STAINLESS STEEL

SERVICE

STORAGE

SUSPENDED

SOUTHWEST

SEE WINDOW SCHEDULE

SYMMETRICAL
TREAD

TACKBOARD

TECHNOLOGY

TELEPHONE
TEMPERED or TEMPERATURE

TERRAZZO

TONGUE & GROOVE
THICK

THRESHOLD
TOP OF
TOP OF CURB or CONCRETE

TOP OF DECKING

TOP OF MASONRY
TOP OF PAVEMENT or

PARAPET

TOP OF STEEL

TOP OF WALL

TUBULAR STEEL

TOILET SEAT COVER

DISPENSER

TOILET TISSUE DISPENSER

TELEVISION

TYPICAL

UNIFORM BUILDING CODE

UNDERGROUND

UNDERWRITERS

LABORATORY

UNFINISHED

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
URINAL

VINYL COMPOSITION TILE

VERTICAL

VESTIBULE

VERTICAL GRAIN DOUGLAS
FIR

VERIFY IN FIELD
VOLUME
VENT THRU ROOF (S..P.D.

VINYL WALL COVERING

WEST OR WASHER
WITH

WATER CLOSET

WASHER/DRYER
WOOD
WINDOW

WIDE FLANGE

WIRE GLASS

WATER HEATER

WOODWORK INSTITUTE

OF CALIFORNIA

WHERE OCCURS

WITHOUT

WORKING POINT

WAINSCOT

WET STANDPIPE
WEIGHT

WELDED WIRE FABRIC
AND
AT

CHANNEL
PENNY

POUND OR NUMBER

GENERAL NOTES
A.B.

ABV.

A.C.

A.C.T.

A/C
ACOUS.

A.D.

ADMIN.

ADJ.

A.F.F.

AGGR.

AL.

ALT.

A.P.

APP
APPROX.

ARCH.

ASPH.

ATTEN.

BD.

BET.

B.F.

BLDG.

BLK.

BM.

BOT.

CAB.

C/C
CEM.

CER.

C.F.

CH.

C.I.

C.J.

C.L.

CLG.

CLKG.

CLO.

CLR.

C.M.U.

COL.

COMP.

CONC.

CONF.

CONT.

CONTR.

CONST.

CORR.

CPT.

C.R.

CSMT.

C.T.

CTR.

CTSK.

C.Y.

DBL.

DECK.

DEG.

DEMO.

DEPT.

DET.

D.F.

DIA.

DIM.

DIR.

DISP.

DIST.

DIV.

DN.

DR.

D.S.

D.S.A.

D.S.P.

DWG.

E.
(E)
EA.

E.J.

EL.

ELAS.

ELEC.

ELEV.

EMER.

ENCL.

ENGR.

EQ.

EQUIP.

E.S.

EXP.

EXH.

EXIST.

EXT.

E.W.

F.A.

F.A.F.

F.D.

FND.

F.E.

F.E.C.

FED.

F.V.

F.F.

F.H.C.

FIN.

FIX.

F.L.

FLR.

FLUOR.

F.O.

F.O.C.

F.O.F.

F.O.M.

F.O.S.

F.O.W.

FPRF.

FRM'G
F.R.T.

F.R.P.

F.S.

F.S.E.

FT.

FTG.

FURR.

FUT.

GA.

GALV.

G.L.B.

GL
GND.

G.R.G.

G.S.M.

GYP.

G.W.B.

H.B.

H.C.

HDWR.

HDWD.

HT.

H.M.

HORIZ.

H.P.

HVAC
I.D.

IN.

INCAND.

INCR.

INFO.

INSUL.

INT.

JAN.

JST.

JT.

KIT.

K.P.

LAB.

LAM.

LAV.

LB.

L.F.

L.H.

LIN.

LKR.

L.L.H.

L.P.

LT.

LVR.

MACH.

MAINT.

MATL.

MAS.

MAX.

M.B.

M.C.

MECH.

MEMB.

MEP
MET.

MFR.

MIC/TC
MIN.

MIR.

MISC.

MK.

M.O.

MTD.

MTL.

MUL.

N.
(N)
N/A
N.E.

N.I.C.

NO.

NOM.

N.T.S.

N.W.

OBS.

O.C.

O.D.

O.F.C.I.

O.F.D.

O.F.S.

O.H.

OPNG.

OPP. HD.

OZ.

P.A.

P.B.

P.C.P.

PERIM.

PL.

PL .G.

P.LAM.

PLAS.

PLBG.

PLYWD.

PNL.

PR.

PREP.

P.S.F.

P.S.I.

P.T.

PT.

P.T.D.

PTN.

PVC
PVMT.

R.
(R)
R.A.

RAD.

R.B.

R.C.P.

R.D.

REF.

REF
REFR.

REINF.

REQD.

REV.

RESIL.

R.H.

RM.

R.O.

RWD.

R.W.L.

S.A.

S.B.

S.C.

S.C.D.

SCHED.

S.D.

S.D.S.

S.E.

S.E.D.

SECT.

S.F.

S.F.S.

S.G.S.

SHT.

SHTG.

SIM.

S.L.D.

S.M.

SL
SMACNA
S.M.D.

S.M.S.

S.N.D.

S.N.R.

S.O.G.

S.P.D.

SPEC.

SPR
S.P.S.

SQ.

S.S.D.

STD.

STL.

STRL.

S4S
S2S
S.S.

SVC
STOR
SUSP.

S.W.

S.W.S.

SYM.

T.B.

TECH.

TELE.

TEMP.

TER.

T & G
THK.

THRES.

T.O.

T.O.C.

T.O.D.

T.O.M.

T.O.P.

T.O.S.

T.O.W.

T.S.

T.S.C.D.

T.T.D.

TV
TYP.

U.B.C.

U.G.

U.L.

UNF.

U.O.N.

UR.

V.C.T.

VERT.

VEST.

V.G.D.F.

V.I.F.

VOL.

V.T.R.

V.W.C.

W/
W.C.

W/D
WD.

WDW.

W.F.

WGL
W.H.

W.I.C.

W.O.

W/O
W.P.

WSCT.

W.S.P.

WT.

W.W.F.
&
@
d
#

19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT ALL PERTINENT SHOP DRAWINGS AND COLOR SAMPLES (INCLUDING CASEWORK) FOR THE ARCHITECT'S REVIEW. ALLOWING ADEQUATE TIME FOR REVIEW AND CORRECTIVE ACTION, SHOULD IT BE REQUIRED. BY

SUBMITTING SHOP DRAWINGS, THE CONTRACTOR THEREBY REPRESENTS THAT HE HAS

VERIFIED ALL FIELD MEASUREMENTS, METHODS OF ACCESS TO THE POINT OF

INSTALLATION AND SIMILAR FIELD CRITERIA FOR CABINETRY/MILLWORK AND ALL PREFABRICATED ASSEMBLIES OTHER THEN BUILDING STANDARD WORK.

20. THE CONTRACTOR, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE, SHALL KEEP THE PROJECT AREA AND SURROUNDING AREA FREE FROM DUST NUISANCE. THE WORK SHALL BE IN

CONFORMANCE WITH THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND AGENCIES.

21. NO EXTRA WORK OR CHARGE SHALL BE MADE UNLESS WRITTEN AND

COUNTERSIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT AND OWNER OR WRITTEN ORDER FROM THE ARCHITECT IS OBTAINED. THIS ORDER SHALL STATE THAT THE OWNER HAS

AUTHORIZED THE EXTRA WORK OR CHARGE AND NO CLAIM FOR AN ADDITIONAL SUM SHALL BE VALID UNLESS SO PRESENTED AS DESCRIBED ABOVE.

22. CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND WASTES SHALL BE DEPOSITED AT AN APPROPRIATE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT ALL TIMES, KEEP PREMISES FREE FROM ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS CAUSED BY ITS OPERATIONS. AT THE COMPLETION OF THE WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN THE BUILDING AND LEAVE THE WORK "READY FOR MOPPING AND WAXING."

23. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REVIEWING AND FIELD VERIFYING DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS IN RELATION TO CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. THE

ARCHITECT IS TO BE NOTIFIED OF ANY AND ALL CONFLICTS, DISCREPANCIES OR PROBLEMS.

24. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR AND PATCH ALL AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO THIS PROJECT'S SCOPE OF WORK.

25. THE HEIGHT OF ANY NEW ACCESSIBLE WATER CLOSETS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 17" AND A MAXIMUM OF 19" AS MEASURED TO THE TOP OF THE TOILET SEAT. CONTROLS

SHALL BE OPERABLE WITH ONE HAND AND SHALL NOT REQUIRE TIGHT GRASPING, PINCHING OR TWISTING OF THE WRIST. CONTROLS FOR FLUSH VALVES SHALL BE MOUNTED ON THE WIDE SIDE OF TOILET AREAS NO MORE THEN 44" ABOVE THE FLOOR.

THE FORCE TO ACTIVATE THE CONTROLS SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN 5 POUNDS.

26. ANY NEW ACCESSIBLE URINALS SHALL HAVE A RIM PROJECTING A MINIMUM OF 14" FROM THE WALL AND AT A MAXIMUM OF 17" ABOVE THE FLOOR. FLUSH CONTROLS SHALL BE HAND OPERATED AND SHALL BE MOUNTED NO MORE THAN 44" ABOVE THE FLOOR.

27. WATER AND DRAIN PIPES UNDER LAVATORIES SHALL BE INSULATED OR OTHERWISE COVERED. THERE SHALL BE NO SHARP OR ABRASIVE SURFACES UNDER LAVATORIES.

28. ANY NEW FAUCET CONTROLS AND OPERATING MECHANISMS SHALL BE OPERABLE

WITH ONE HAND AND SHALL NOT REQUIRE TIGHT GRASPING, PINCHING OR TWISTING OF THE WRIST. THE FORCE REQUIRED TO ACTIVATE CONTROLS SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 5 POUNDS. LEVER-OPERATED, PUSH-TYPE AND ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED MECHANISMS ARE EXAMPLES OF ACCEPTABLE DESIGNS. SELF-CLOSING VALVES ARE ALLOWED IF THE FAUCET REMAINS OPEN FOR AT LEAST 10 SECONDS.

29. TOILET ROOM ACCESSIBLE DOOR IDENTIFICATION SYMBOLS ARE TO BE PROVIDED PER CCR, TITLE 24 AT ACCESSIBLE TOILET FACILITIES.

30. ANY NEW DRINKING FOUNTAIN SHALL BE ACTIVATED BY A CONTROL WHICH IS

EASILY OPERATED BY A PERSON W/ DISABILITIES SUCH AS A HAND-OPERATED LEVER TYPE CONTROL LOCATED WITHIN 6" OF THE FRONT OF THE DRINKING FOUNTAIN, ETC. THE

BUBBLER SHALL BE SUBSTANTIALLY PARALLEL TO THE FRONT EDGE OF THE DRINKING FOUNTAIN.

31. ALL NEW GYPSUM BOARD TO BE INSTALLED CONSISTENT WITH 2019 CBC SECTION 2508.

32. ALL NEW GLAZING IS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH 2019 CBC CHAPTER 24

33. ALL NEW EXIT DOORS SHALL BE OPERABLE FROM THE INSIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR ANY SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT. NO DEADBOLTS, NO SLIDING BOLTS, ETC. (CBC SECTION 1010.1.9)

34. ALL NEW HAND-ACTIVATED DOOR OPENING HARDWARE SHALL BE CENTERED BETWEEN 34" AND 44" ABOVE THE FLOOR. LATCHING AND LOCKING DOORS THAT ARE

HAND ACTIVATED AND WHICH ARE IN A PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL BE OPERABLE WITH A SINGLE EFFORT BY LEVER TYPE HARDWARE. LOCKED DOORS SHALL OPERATE AS ABOVE IN THE EGRESS DIRECTION.

35. MAXIMUM EFFORT TO OPERATE ANY NEW DOORS SHALL NOT EXCEED 5 POUNDS FOR EXTERIOR DOORS AND 5 POUNDS FOR INTERIOR DOORS, SUCH PULL OR PUSH

EFFORT BEING APPLIED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO HINGED DOORS AND AT THE CENTER PLANE OF SLIDING OR FOLDING DOORS. COMPENSATING DEVICES OR AUTOMATIC DOOR OPERATORS MAY BE UTILIZED TO MEET THE ABOVE STANDARDS. WHEN FIRE

RATED DOORS ARE REQUIRED, THE MAXIMUM EFFORT TO OPERATE THE DOOR MAY BE INCREASED BUT NOT TO EXCEED 15 POUNDS, WHEN APPROVED BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES.

36. THE BOTTOM 10" OF ALL NEW DOORS EXCEPT AUTOMATIC AND SLIDING DOORS

SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNINTERRUPTED SURFACE TO ALLOW THE DOOR TO BE

OPENED BY A WHEELCHAIR FOOTREST WITHOUT CREATING A TRAP OR HAZARDOUS CONDITION. WHERE NARROW FRAME DOORS ARE USED, A 10" HIGH SMOOTH PANEL

SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE PUSH SIDE OF THE DOOR, WHICH WILL ALLOW THE DOOR

TO BE OPENED BY A WHEELCHAIR FOOTREST WITHOUT CREATING A TRAP OR HAZARDOUS CONDITION.

37. ANY NEW DOORS AND FRAMES WITH 20 MINUTES TO AND INCLUDING 90 MINUTES

RATINGS SHALL HAVE SMOKE SEAL GASKETS AND SELF CLOSERS OR AUTOMATIC CLOSERS CONNECTED TO FIRE ALARM.

38. WORK NOTED AS "OFCI" (OWNER-FURNISH, CONTRACTOR-INSTALL) SHALL MEET

ALL APPLICABLE CODES & REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS, AND SHALL BE INSTALLED &

FULLY OPERATIONAL PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL & OCCUPANCY OF THIS PROJECT

39. PLUMBING FIXTURES AND FITTINGS SHALL MEET THE APPLICABLE STANDARDS REFERENCED IN TABLE 1701.1 OF THE 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE AND IN CHAPTER 6 OF CGC (CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE). WATER EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS: PLUMBING FIXTURES (WATER CLOSETS AND URINALS) AND

FITTINGS (FAUCETS, FOUNDATIONS, AND SHOWER-HEADS) SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PRESCRIPTIVE REDUCED FLOW RATES SPECIFIED IN CGC 5.303.2.3.1 THROUGH

5.303.45.303.3.1 THROUGH 5.303.3.4. TOILETS: MAX. 1.28 GALLONS PER FLUSH. URINALS:

MAX. 0.125 GALLONS PER FLUSH. SHOWER-HEADS: MAX. FLOW RATE OF NOT MORE THAN 1.8 GALLONS PER MINUTE AT 80 PSI. LAVATORY FAUCETS: MAX. FLOW RATE OF NOT MORE THAN 0.5 GALLONS PER MINUTE AT 60 PSI.KITCHEN FAUCETS: MAX. FLOW RATE OF NOT MORE THAN 1.8 GALLONS PER MINUTE AT 60 PSI. KITCHEN FAUCETS MAY TEMPORARILY INCREASE THE FLOW ABOVE THE MAX RATE, BUT NOT TO EXCEED 2.2 GALLONS PER MINUTE AT 60 PSI, AND MUST DEFAULT TO A MAXIMUM FLOW RATE OF 1.8 GALLONS PER MINUTE AT 60 PSI. FOOD WASTE DISPOSERS: DISPOSERS SHALL EITHER MODULATE THE USE OF WATER TO NO MORE THAN 1 GPM WHEN THE DISPOSER IS NOT

IN USE (NOT ACTIVELY GRINDING FOOD WASTE/NO-LOAD) OR SHALL AUTOMATICALLY SHUT OFF AFTER NO MORE THAN 10 MINUTES OF INACTIVITY. DISPOSERS SHALL USE NO MORE THAN 8 GPM OF WATER.

1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF BIDS TO REVIEW EXISTING CONDITIONS OF AREAS THAT ARE TO BE BID.

2. ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS:
2A. THE INTENT OF THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS IS THAT THE WORK OF THE ALTERATION AND ADDITIONS IS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 24, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS. SHOULD ANY EXISTING CONDITIONS SUCH AS

DETERIORATION OR NON-COMPLYING CONSTRUCTION BE DISCOVERED WHICH IS NOT

COVERED BY THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS WHEREIN THE FINISHED WORK WILL NOT COMPLY WITH TITLE 24, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, A CHANGE ORDER, OR A

SEPARATE SET OF DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, DETAILING AND SPECIFYING THE

REQUIRED WORK SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY AREA HAVING JURISDICTION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

3. USE OF ANY MATERIAL CONTAINING ASBESTOS IS PROHIBITED.

4. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. DRAWINGS SHOULD BE USED AS A SUPPLEMENTAL TOOL

FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S USE IN REVIEWING ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING.

5. DIMENSIONS FROM EXISTING SURFACE OR ASSEMBLIES ARE APPROXIMATE DUE TO THE AS-BUILT CONDITIONS VARYING FROM ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. DIMENSIONS ARE FROM/TO CENTERLINE OR FACE OF STUDS/SHEATHING U.O.N. PER PLANS.

6. MATCH LINES ARE INDICATORS OF WHERE ADJOINING FLOOR PLANS MEET. SEE PLANS ON BOTH SIDES OF MATCH LINE FOR INFORMATION OVERLAPPING THE LINE.

7. THE INTENT OF THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS IS TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR,

MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES NECESSARY FOR ALL WORK SHOWN, PRESCRIBED,

OR REASONABLY IMPLIED, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THAT EXPLICITLY INDICATED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. WHERE WORK OR EQUIPMENT IS INDICATED N.I.C. (NOT IN CONTRACT), SUCH WORK AND/OR EQUIPMENT SHALL BY PROVIDED BY OTHERS.

CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND COOPERATE TO EFFECT SUCH INSTALLATION.

ALL REQUESTS FOR CLARIFICATIONS OF THESE DRAWINGS SHALL BE DIRECTED TO THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD. ALL REQUIRED WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE

CONTRACTOR INCLUDING THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND HIS SUBCONTRACTORS, THEY SHALL BE ONE AND THE SAME. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH ALL OTHER TRADES ON THE PROJECTS. ANY CHANGES OR DELAYS ARISING FROM

CONFLICTS BETWEEN TRADES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSURING THAT ALL TRADES COORDINATE INTERFACE BETWEEN THEMSELVES, IE.

PLUMBING, ROUGH-IN CABINETRY, ETC.

8. EXISTING UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS DAMAGED DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK SHALL BE PROMPTLY REPAIRED. EXISTING UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS

DAMAGED FOR WHICH LOCATIONS WERE UNKNOWN, SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT

TO THE OWNER'S AND ARCHITECT'S ATTENTION AND PROMPTLY REPAIRED AT HIS/HER DIRECTION. THE WORK REQUIRED TO REPAIR DAMAGED EXISTING UTILITIES AND

IMPROVEMENTS FOR WHICH LOCATIONS WERE UNKNOWN WILL BE REVIEWED AND TAKEN UNDER CONSIDERATION AS EXTRA WORK.

9. ALL ITEMS NOTED TO BE SALVAGED SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE OWNER.

10. THE TERM "TYPICAL" (TYP.) SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO MEAN APPLYING TO ALL LIKE OR SIMILAR CONDITIONS IN THE AREAS DESIGNATED FOR WORK SCOPE (IE. WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THIS PROJECT.).

11. PENETRATIONS IN FIRE RATED ASSEMBLIES AND BEARING WALLS SHALL BE PROTECTED AS REQUIRED BY 2019 CBC CHAPTER 7.

12. THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING THE SPECIFICATIONS, PLANS AND

DRAWINGS, ARE COMPLEMENTARY AND WHAT IS CALLED FOR BY ANY ONE SHALL BE AS BINDING AS IF CALLED FOR BY ALL. IN CASE OF CONFLICT, LARGE SCALE (DETAIL) DRAWINGS SHALL GOVERN OVER SMALL-SCALE DRAWINGS. THE SPECIFICATIONS SHALL

GOVERN OVER BOTH THE CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES MANUAL AND THE CONTRACT

DRAWINGS EXCEPT AS NOTED HEREIN BELOW, SPECIAL PROVISIONS SHALL GOVERN

OVER BOTH THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND THE GENERAL CONDITIONS, AND SUBSEQUENT ADDENDA. INTERPRETATIONS, OR CHANGE ORDERS SHALL GOVERN OVER

THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS, UNLESS A DIFFERENT ORDER OF PROCEDURE IS NOTED ELSEWHERE IN CONJUNCTION WITH A SPECIFIC PORTION OF THE DOCUMENTS.

IN CASE OF CONFLICT BETWEEN THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, THE

DOCUMENT CONTAINING ADDITIONAL QUANTITIES SHALL GOVERN IN MATTERS OF QUANTITY; THE DOCUMENT REQUIRING A HIGHER DEGREE OF QUALITY SHALL GOVERN IN MATTERS OF QUALITY. IN CASE OF CONFLICT WITHIN THE DRAWINGS INVOLVING

QUANTITIES OR WITHIN THE SPECIFICATIONS INVOLVING QUALITY, THE GREATER QUANTITY AND THE HIGHER QUALITY SHALL BE FURNISHED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL

NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF ALL SUCH QUANTITY AND QUALITY CONFLICTS AND SHALL AGREE UPON RESOLUTION, IN WRITING, PRIOR TO PROCEEDING.

WHERE ON ANY DRAWING A PORTION OF THE WORK IS DRAWN OUT AND THE

REMAINDER IS INDICATED IN OUTLINE, THE DRAWN-OUT PARTS SHALL APPLY TO ALL OTHER LIKE PORTIONS OF THE WORK. WHERE ORNAMENT OR OTHER DETAILS IS

INDICATED AS STARTING, SUCH DETAIL SHALL BE CONTINUED THROUGHOUT THE

COURSES OR PARTS IN WHICH IT OCCURS AND SHALL ALSO APPLY TO OTHER SIMILAR PARTS IN THE WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.

13. ITEMS INDICATED TO BE VERIFIED OR FIELD VERIFIED ARE REQUIRED TO BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. ITEMS ARE ALWAYS

TO BE VERIFIED FOR DESIGN INTENT AND COMPATIBILITY

14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY, SIDEWALKS, CORRIDORS, ETC., AFFECTED BY THE CONSTRUCTION, AND KEEP THESE AREAS FREE OF ALL SOIL, DEBRIS, TRASH, ETC., ON A DAILY BASIS. CLEAN EGRESS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES FOR ALL ADJACENT BUILDING TENANTS, THEIR EMPLOYEES AND GUESTS.

15. THE ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL OF SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL NOT RELIEVE THE

GENERAL CONTRACTOR FROM RESPONSIBILITY FOR DEVIATIONS FROM DRAWINGS OR

SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS HE HAS (IN WRITING) CALLED THE ARCHITECT'S ATTENTION TO

SUCH DEVIATIONS AT THE TIME OF SUBMISSION NOR SHALL IT RELIEVE HIM OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR ERRORS OF ANY SORT IN THE SHOP DRAWINGS.

16. GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR ITS SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR

VERIFICATION AND APPROVALS OF SUBSTITUTED MATERIALS AS REQUIRED BY GOVERNING CODES AND AGENCIES.

17. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTORS TO SUPPLY AND

DISTRIBUTE ADEQUATE COPIES OF ALL DRAWINGS TO ALL TRADES FALLING UNDER THEIR RESPONSIBILITY AT ALL TIMES DURING THE PROGRESS OF THE JOB (IE. REVISIONS).

18. UPON COMPLETION OF THE JOB, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT

CERTIFICATES OF INSPECTION OF SATISFACTORY COMPLETION, AND OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS OF ALL EQUIPMENT TO THE OWNER AND TENANT.

CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ALL WORK AND MATERIALS IN

CONFORMANCE WITH ANY CODE OR CODES OF FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY OR MUNICIPALITY HAVING JURISDICTION OVER SUCH WORK. ALL APPLICABLE

REQUIREMENTS IN THESE REGULATIONS ALL BE FOLLOWED THE SAME AS IF NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. CONFLICTS BETWEEN WORK SET FORT ON THE DRAWINGS AND

BUILDING CODES, LAWS OR REGULATIONS NOTED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR

SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ARCHITECT FOR RESOLUTION PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

40. CGC MECHANICAL REQUIREMENTS:

THE PERMANENT HVAC SYSTEM SHALL ONLY BE USED DURING CONSTRUCTION IF

NECESSARY TO CONDITION THE BUILDING OR AREAS OF ADDITION OR ALTERATION

WITHIN THE REQUIRED TEMPERATURE RANGE FOR MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION. IF THE HVAC SYSTEM IS USED DURING CONSTRUCTION, USE RETURN AIR FILTERS WITH A MINIMUM EFFICIENCY REPORTING VALUE (MERV) OF 8, BASED ON ASHRAE 52.2-1999, OR AN AVERAGE EFFICIENCY OF 30 PERCENT BASED ON ASHRAE

52.1-1992. REPLACE ALL FILTERS IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, OR, IF THE

BUILDING IS OCCUPIED DURING ALTERATION, AT THE CONCLUSION OF CONSTRUCTION. PER CGC 5.504.1

AT THE TIME OF ROUGH INSTALLATION OR DURING STORAGE ON THE CONSTRUCTION

SITE AND UNTIL FINAL STARTUP OF THE HEATING, COOLING AND VENTILATING

EQUIPMENT, ALL DUCT AND OTHER RELATED AIR DISTRIBUTION COMPONENT

OPENINGS SHALL BE COVERED WITH TAPE, PLASTIC, SHEET METAL OR OTHER METHODS

ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENFORCING AGENCY TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF DUST OR DEBRIS WHICH MAY COLLECT IN THE SYSTEM. PER CGC 5.504.3.

IN MECHANICALLY VENTILATED BUILDINGS, PROVIDE REGULARLY OCCUPIED AREAS OF

THE BUILDING WITH AIR FILTRATION MEDIA FOR OUTSIDE AND RETURN AIR PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY THAT PROVIDES AT LEAST A MERV VALUE OF 13. MERV 13 FILTERS SHALL BE

INSTALLED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY, AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MAINTENANCE

WITH FILTERS OF THE SAME VALUE SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL. PER CGC 5.504.5.3.

INDOOR MOISTURE CONTROL. BUILDINGS SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE CBC TITLE 24, PART 2, SECTIONS 1203 (VENTILATION) AND CHAPTER 14 (EXTERIOR WALLS).

INDOOR AIR QUALITY (5.506)
OUTDOOR AIR DELIVERY. FOR ALL VENTILATED SPACES, MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 120.1 (REQUIREMENTS FOR VENTILATION) OF THE 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, OR LOCAL CODE, WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT.

CARBON DIOXIDE (CO2) MONITORING. BUILDINGS EQUIPPED WITH DEMAND CONTROL VENTILATION, CO2 SENSORS AND VENTILATION CONTROLS SHALL BE SPECIFIED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE SECTION 120(C)(4).

41. CGC MATERIALS REQUIREMENTS:

FINISH MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTIONS CGC 5.504.4.1. THROUGH 5.504.4.6.

ADHESIVES, SEALANTS AND CAULKS USED ON THE PROJECT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS LISTED IN CGC 5.504.4.1.

ARCHITECTURAL PAINTS AND COATINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH TABLE CGC 5.504.4.3 UNLESS MORE STRINGENT LOCAL LIMITS APPLY.

VERIFICATION. VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE REQUEST OF THE ENFORCING AGENCY.

COMPOSITE WOOD PRODUCTS: HARDWOOD, PLYWOOD, PARTICLEBOARD AND

MEDIUM DENSITY FIBERBOARD COMPOSITE WOOD PRODUCTS USED ON THE INTERIOR

OR EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR FORMALDEHYDE AS SPECIFIED IN TABLE 5.504.4.5.

DOCUMENTATION. VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE REQUEST OF THE ENFORCING AGENCY. CGC 5.504.4.5.3.

RESILIENT FLOORING SYSTEMS: 80% OF FLOORING MUST COMPLY WITH THE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: THE VOC-EMISSION LIMITS DEFINED IN THE 2014 CHPS CRITERIA AND LISTED ON ITS HIGH PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS DATABASE; PRODUCTS CERTIFIED UNDER UL GREENGUARD GOLD PROGRAM; CERTIFIED UNDER THE RESILIENT FLOOR COVERING INSTITUTE FLOOR SCORE PROGRAM; OR MEET CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH 2010 SPECIFICATIONS.

VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE. DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR VERIFYING THAT RESILIENT FLOORING MATERIALS MEET THE POLLUTANT EMISSION LIMITS.

42. PROHIBIT SMOKING WITHIN 25 FEET OF BUILDING ENTRIES, OUTDOOR INTAKES AND OPERABLE WINDOWS. POST SIGNAGE WHEN LOCAL ORDINANCES OR POLICIES ARE NOT IN PLACE PER CGC 5.504.7.

43. OUTDOOR LIGHTING SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED TO COMPLY

WITH REQUIREMENTS IN THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH CGC 5.106.8.

BUILDING PERMIT
DATE 10/06/22 5(7A,/
5(129A7,21
803 DELAWARE STREET
BERKELEY, CA 94710
ITEM 9 - ATTACHMENT 2
LPC 07-06-2023

Page 2 of 18 ends

Berkeley City CouncilNovember 21, 2023

Berkeley City Council
November 21, 2023