Berkeley City Council
October 29, 2024

III. AGENDA
13City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order Section III.B.2 (Primary Author may decline and request Policy Committee assignment).
iv. Refer the item to a Policy Committee.
v. Schedule the item for the agendaAgenda under consideration or one of the next three fullregular Council agendaAgendas.

For referrals under Chapter III.C.1.a.i, ii, or iii, the Primary Author must inform the City Clerk within 24 hours of the adjournment of the Agenda & Rules Committee meeting whether they prefer to:
1) re-submit the item for a future meeting with modifications as suggested by the Agenda & Rules Committee; or
2) withdrawpull the item completely; or
3) re-submit the item with revisions as requested by the Agenda & Rules Committee within 24 hours of the adjournment of the Agenda & Rules Committee meeting for the Council agendaAgenda under consideration; or
4) accept the referral of the Agenda & Rules Committee in sub paragraphs III.C.1.a. i, ii, or iii, or request Policy Committee assignment.

If the Primary Author requests a Policy Committee assignment, the item will appear on the next draft agendaAgenda presented to the Agenda & Rules Committee for assignment.

In the event that the City Clerk does not receive guidance from the Primary Author of the referred item within 24 hours of the Agenda & Rules Committee’s adjournment, the item will appear on the next draft agendaAgenda for consideration by the Agenda & Rules Committee.

Items held being resubmitted for a future meeting to allow for modifications will be placed on the next available Council meeting agendaAgenda at the time that the revised version is submitted to the City Clerk. b) Items Authored by the City ManagerCharter Officers and the Auditor.

The Agenda & Rules Committee shall review agenda descriptions of items authored by the City ManagerCharter Officers and the Auditor. The Committee can recommend that the matter be referred to a commission, to a Policy Committee, or back to the City ManagerCharter Officer or the Auditor for adherence to required form, additional analysis as required in Section III.B.2, or suggest other appropriate action including scheduling the matter for a later meeting to allow for appropriate revisions.

III. AGENDA
14City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order If the City ManagerCharter Officer or the Auditor determines that their item matter should proceed notwithstanding the Agenda & Rules Committee’s recommendationaction, it will be placed on the agendaAgenda as directed by the ManagerCharter Officer or the Auditor. All Charter Officer and Auditor City Manageritems placed on the Council agendaAgenda against the recommendation of the Agenda & Rules Committee will automatically be placed on the Action Calendar.
c) Items Authored by Boards and Commissions.

Agenda ItemsCouncil items submitted by boards and commissions are subject to City Manager review and must follow procedures and timelines for submittal of reports as described in the Commissioners’ Manual. The content of commission items is not subject to review by the Agenda & Rules Committee unless referred for policy review to the Agenda & Rules Committee.
i) For a commission item that does not require a companion report from the City Manager, the Agenda & Rules Committee may act on an agendized commission itemreport in the following manner:

1. Move a commission report from the Consent Calendar to the Action Calendar or from the Action Calendar to the Consent Calendar.

2. Re-schedule the commission report to appear on one of the next three regular Council meeting agendaAgendas that occur after the regular meeting under consideration. Commission reports submitted in response to a Council referral shall receive higher priority for scheduling.

3. Refer the item to a Policy Committee for review.

4. Allow the item to proceed as submitted.
ii) For any commission report that requires a City Manager companion report, the Agenda & Rules Committee may schedule the item on a Council agendaAgenda. The Committee must schedule the
commission item for a meeting occurring not sooner than 60 days and not later than 120 days from the date of the meeting under consideration by the Agenda & Rules Committee. A commission report submitted with a complete companion report may be scheduled pursuant to subparagraph ec.i. above.
d) The Agenda & Rules Committee shall have the authority to re-order the items on the Action Calendar regardless of the default sequence prescribed in Chapter III, Section E.

2. Scheduling Public Hearings Mandated by State, Federal, or Local Statute.

III. AGENDA
15City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order The City Clerk may schedule a public hearing at an available time and date in those cases where State, Federal or local statute mandates the City Council hold a public hearing.

3. Submission of Agenda Items.
a) City ManagerCharter Officer Items. Except for Continued Business and Old Business, as a condition to placing an item on the agendaAgenda, agenda itemAgenda Items from departments, including agenda itemAgenda Items from commissions, shall be furnished to the City Clerk at a time established by the City Manager.
b) Council and Auditor Items. The deadline for reports submitted by the Auditor, Mayor and City Councilmembers is 5:00 p.m. on Monday, 22 days before each regular Council meeting.
c) Time Critical Items. A Time Critical item is defined as a matter that is considered urgent by the Authorsponsor and that has a deadline for action that is prior to the next meeting of the Council and for which a report prepared by the City Managera Charter Officer, the Auditor, Mayor or Councilmember is received by the City Clerk after established deadlines and is not included on the Agenda & Rules Committee’s published agendaAgenda.

The Primary Author of the report shall bring any reports submitted as Time Critical to the meeting of the Agenda & Rules Committee. Time Critical items must be accompanied by complete reports and statements of financial implications. If the Agenda & Rules Committee finds the matter to meet the definition of Time Critical, the Agenda & Rules Committee may place the matter on the Agenda on either the Consent or Action Calendar. d) Timelines. The City Clerk may not accept any agenda itemAgenda Item after the adjournment of the Agenda & Rules Committee meeting, except for items carried over by the City Council from a prior City Council meeting occurring less than 11 days earlier, which may include supplemental or revised reports, and reports concerning actions taken by boards and commissions that are required by law or ordinance to be presented to the Council within a deadline that does not permit compliance with the agenda timelines in BMC Chapter 2.06 or these rules.

4. Submission of Supplemental and Revised Agenda Material.

Berkeley Municipal Code Section 2.06.070 allows for the submission of supplemental and revised agenda material. Supplemental and revised material cannot be substantially new or only tangentially related to an agenda itemAgenda Item. Supplemental material must be specifically related to the item in the Agenda Packet. Revised material should be presented as revised versions of the report or item printed in the Agenda Packet. Supplemental and revised material may be submitted for consideration as follows:

III. AGENDA
16City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order a) Supplemental and revised agenda material shall be submitted to the City Clerk no later than 5:00 p.m. seven calendar days prior to the City Council meeting at which it is to be considered. Supplemental and revised items that are received by the deadline shall be distributed to Council in a supplemental reports packet and posted to the City’s website no later than 5:00 p.m. five calendar days prior to the meeting. Copies of the supplemental packet shall also be made available in the office of the City Clerk and in the main branch of the Berkeley Public Library. Such material may be considered by the Council without the need for a determination that the good of the City clearly outweighs the lack of time for publiccitizen review or City Councilmember evaluation.
b) Supplemental and revised agenda material submitted to the City Clerk after 5:00 p.m. seven days before the meeting and no later than 12:00 p.m. one day prior to the City Council meeting at which it is to be considered shall be distributed to Council in a supplemental reports packet and posted to the City’s website no later than 5:00 p.m. one day prior to the meeting.

Copies of the supplemental packet shall also be made available in the office of the City Clerk and in the main branch of the Berkeley Public Library. Such material may be considered by the Council without the need for a determination that the good of the City clearly outweighs the lack of time for publiccitizen review or City Council evaluation. c) After 12:00 p.m. one calendar day prior to the meeting, supplemental or revised reports may be submitted for consideration by delivering a minimum of 4240 copies of the supplemental/revised material to the City Clerk for distribution at the meeting and submitting the material electronically to the City Clerk. Each copy must be accompanied by a completed supplemental/revised material cover page, using the form provided by the City Clerk. Revised reports must reflect a comparison with the original item using track changes formatting. The material may be considered only if the City Council, by a two-thirds roll call vote, makes a factual determination that the good of the City clearly outweighs the lack of time for publiccitizen review or City Councilmember evaluation of the material. Supplemental and revised material must be distributed and a factual determination made prior to the commencement of public comment on the agenda itemAgenda Item in order for the material to be considered.

5. Submission of Late Urgency Items Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b)
Late Urgency Items are items proposed for submission to the Council Agenda pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b)
All items to be submitted for consideration for addition to an agendaAgenda as Late Urgency Items shall be accompanied by a cover sheet that includes 1) boxes to check for the Author to affirm whether the item is submitted under the Emergency or Immediate Action Rule (and a short explanation of what is required to meet each rule, as well as the vote threshold required for the item to be placed onto the agendaAgenda by the City Commented [NML7]: For web posting so that virtual
attendees have access

III. AGENDA
17City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order Council); 2) a disclaimer in BOLD 14pt. CAPS stating that the item is not yet agendized and may or may not be accepted for the agendaAgenda as a Late Urgency Item, at the City Council’s discretion according to Brown Act rules; 3) a prompt requiring the authorAuthor to list the facts which support consideration of the item for addition to the agendaAgenda as either an Emergency or Immediate Action item; and 4) a copy of the City Attorney memo on Late Urgency Items.

Late Items must be submitted to the City Clerk no later than 12:00 p.m. (noon) the day prior to the meeting.

All complete Late Items submitted by the deadline will be distributed with Supplemental Communication Packet #2 by 5:00 p.m. the day before the Council meeting. A Late Item is not considered “complete” and will not be distributed unless submitted with the required cover sheet, filled out in a complete manner.

Very Late Urgency Items of an extremely urgent nature (e.g., earthquake, severe wildfire, pandemic) may be submitted for addition to the agendaAgenda after the deadline of 12:00 p.m. the day before the meeting to accommodate unforeseeable, extreme and unusual circumstances. A Very Late Urgency Item will be distributed at the Council meeting prior to any vote to add it to the agendaAgenda and the Presiding Officer may provide an appropriate break to allow Councilmembers and the public to review the item before voting on whether to add it to the agendaAgenda and possibly again, at the Presiding Officer’s discretion, before the item is voted on.

The required cover sheet should be included with the Very Late Urgency Item unless extremely exigent circumstances underlie the Very Late Urgency Item submission and a written cover sheet could not be prepared (for example, power is out and printing or emailing is not possible), in which case the individual “walking in” the item should be ready to provide all required information verbally at the meeting before a vote is taken to add or not add the item to the Agenda.

6. Scheduling a Presentation.

Presentations from staff are either submitted as an Agenda Item or are requested by the City Manager. Presentations from outside agencies and the public are coordinated with the Mayor's Office. The Agenda & Rules Committee may adjust the schedule of presentations as needed to best manage the Council Agenda.

The Agenda & Rules Committee may request a presentation by staff in consultation with the City Manager.

D. Packet Preparation and Posting

1. Preparation of the Packet.

Not later than the thirteenth day prior to said meeting, the City Clerk shall prepare the packetPacket, which shall include the agendaAgenda plus all its corresponding agenda itemAgenda Items. No item shall be considered if not included in the packetPacket, except as provided for in Section III.C.4 and Section III.D.4.

2. Distribution and Posting of Agenda.

III. AGENDA
18City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order a) The City Clerk shall post each agendaAgenda of the City Council regular meeting no later than 11 days prior to the meeting and shall post each agendaAgenda of a special meeting at least 24 hours prior toin advance of the meeting inon the official bulletin board. The City Clerk shall maintain an affidavit indicating the location, date and time of posting each agendaAgenda.
b) The City Clerk shall also post agendaAgendas and annotated agendaAgendas of all City Council meetings and notices of public hearings on the City's website.
c) No later than 11 days prior to a regular meeting, copies of the agendaAgenda shall be mailed by the City Clerk to any resident of the City of Berkeley who so requests in writing. Copies shall also be available free of charge in the City Clerk Department.

3. Distribution of the Agenda Packet.

The Agenda Packet shall consist of the Agenda and all supporting documents for agenda itemAgenda Items. No later than 11 days prior to a regular meeting, the City Clerk shall:
a) distribute the Agenda Packet to each member of the City Council; b) post the Agenda Packet to the City’s website;
c) place copies of the Agenda Packet in viewing binders in the office of the City Clerk and in the main branch of the Berkeley Public Library; and d) make the Agenda Packet available to members of the press.

4. Failure to Meet Deadlines.
a) The City Clerk shall not accept any agenda itemAgenda Item or revised agenda itemAgenda Item after the deadlines established. b) Matters not included on the published agendaAgenda may be discussed and acted upon as otherwise authorized by State law or providing the Council finds one of the following conditions is met:
 A majority of the Council determines that the subject meets the criteria of "Emergency" as defined in Section III.B.8.
 Two thirds of the Council determines that there is a need to take immediate action and that the need for action came to the attention of the City subsequent to the posting of the agendaAgenda as required by law.
c) Matters listed on the printed agendaAgenda but for which supporting materials are not received by the City Council on the eleventh day prior to said meeting as part of the agendaAgenda packetPacket, shall not be discussed or acted upon.

III. AGENDA
19City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order E. Agenda Sequence and Order of Business
The Council agendaAgenda for a regular business meeting is to be arranged in the following order:

1. Preliminary Matters: (Ceremonial, Land Acknowledgement Statement, Comments from the City Manager, Comments from the City Auditor [if requested], Non-Agenda Public Comment, Public Comment by Employee Unions) a) The Land Acknowledgement Statement and Public Comment from Employee Unions are regularly agendized only for the first regular meeting of each month.

1.2. Consent Calendar

2.3. Action Calendar
a) Appeals
b) Public Hearings
c) Continued Business
d) Old Business
e) New Business

3.4. Information Reports

4.5. Non-Agenda Public Comment

5.6. Adjournment

6.7. Communications
Action items may be reordered at the discretion of the Chair with the consent of Council.

The Agenda & Rules Committee shall have the authority to re-order the items on the Action Calendar regardless of the default sequence prescribed in this section.

F. Closed Session Documents
This section establishes a policy for the distribution of, and access to, confidential closed session documents by the Mayor and members of the City Council.

1. Confidential closed session materials shall be kept in binders numbered from one to nine and assigned to the Mayor (#9) and each Councilmember (#1 to #8 by district). The binders will contain confidential closed session materials related to Labor Negotiations, Litigation, and Real Estate matters.

2. The binders will be maintained by City staff and retained in the Office of the City Attorney in a secure manner. City staff will bring the binders to each closed session for their use by the Mayor and Councilmembers. At other times, the binders will be available to the Mayor and Councilmembers during regular business hours for review in the City Attorney’s Office. The binders may not be removed from the City Attorney’s Office or the location of any closed session Commented [NML8]: Per discussionn at Agenda & Rules
on 7/8/24 – for clarity.

III. AGENDA
20City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order meeting by the Mayor or Councilmembers. City staff will collect the binders at the end of each closed session meeting and return them to the City Attorney’s Office.

3. Removal of confidential materials from a binder is prohibited.

4. Duplication of the contents of a binder by any means is prohibited.

5. Confidential materials shall be retained in the binders for at least two years.

6. This policy does not prohibit the distribution of materials by staff to the Mayor and Councilmembers in advance of a closed session or otherwise as needed, but such materials shall also be included in the binders unless it is impracticable to do so.

III. AGENDA
21City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order G. Regulations Governing City Council Policy Committees

1. Legislative Item Process
All agenda itemAgenda Items begin with submission to the Agenda & Rules Committee.

Full CouncilExempt Items Track
Items under this category submitted by the Mayor or Councilmembers are exempt from Agenda & Rules Committee discretion to refer them to a Policy Committee.

Items in this category may be submitted for the agendaAgenda of any scheduled regular meeting pursuant to established deadlines (same as existing deadlines).

Types of Full Council TrackExempt Iitems are listed below. a. Items submitted by the City Manager and City Auditor b. Items submitted by Boards and Commissions
c.a. Position Letters and Resolutions on Legislation and Electoral Issues relating to Outside Agencies/Jurisdictions
d. Position Letters and/or Resolutions of Support/Opposition e.b. Relinquishment of FundsDonations from the Mayor and Councilmember District Office Budgets
f.c. Referrals to the Budget Process
g.d. Proclamations
h.e. Sponsorship of Events
i.f. Information Reports
j.g. Presentations from Outside Agencies and Organizations k.h. Ceremonial Items
l.i. Committee and Regional Body Appointments
The Agenda & Rules Committee has discretion to determine if an item submitted by the Mayor or a Councilmember falls under a Full Council is classified as an Exempt Item Track exception or if it will be processed as a Policy Committee or if the item is subject to Policy Committee review Track item.

Policy Committee Track
Items submitted by the Mayor or Councilmembers with moderate to significant administrative, operational, budgetary, resource, or programmatic impacts will go first to the Agenda & Rules Committee on a draft City Council agendaAgenda.

The Agenda & Rules Committee must refer antake action on an item as prescribed in Chapter III.C. to a Policy Committee at the first meeting that the item appears before the Agenda & Rules Committee. The Agenda & Rules Committee may only assign the item to a single Policy Committee.

Commented [NML9]: This is already covered in Chapter
III.D.1.b.

Commented [NML10]: This is now covered in Chapter
III.D.1.c.

Commented [NML11]: No change in process, just
reworded with new terms

III. AGENDA
22City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order For a Policy Committee Track item, the Agenda & Rules Committee, at its discretion, may either route item directly to 1) the Aagenda currently under consideration, 2) one of the next subsequent three full Council Agendas for a Regular Meeting of the City Council (based on completeness of the item, lack of potential controversy, minimal impacts, etc.), or 3) to a Policy Committee.

Time Critical TrackItems
A Time Critical item is defined as a matter that is considered urgent by the sponsor and that has a deadline for action that is prior to the next meeting of the Council and for which a report prepared by the Mayor or Councilmember is received by the City Clerk after established deadlines and is not included on the Agenda & Rules Committee’s published agendaAgenda.

The Agenda & Rules Committee retains final discretion to determine the time critical nature of an item.

Time Critical items submitted on the Full Council Track deadlines, that would otherwise be assigned to a the Policy Committee Track, may bypass Policy Committee review if determined to be time critical. If such an item is deemed not to be time critical, it may be referred to a Policy Committee.

Time Critical items on the Full Council Track or Policy Committee Track that are submitted at a meeting of the Agenda & Rules Committee may go directly on a Ccouncil agendaAgenda if determined to be time critical.

2. Council Referrals to Policy Committees
The full Council may refer any agenda itemAgenda Item to a Policy Committee by majority vote.

3. Participation Rules for Policy Committees Pursuant to the Brown Act a. The quorum of a three-member Policy Committee is always two members. A majority vote of the committee (two ‘yes’ votes) is required to pass a motion. b. Two Policy Committee members may not discuss any item that has been referred to the Policy Committee outside of an open and noticed meeting. c. Notwithstanding paragraph (b) above, two members of a Policy Committee may be listed as Authors or Co-Sponsors on an item provided that one of the Authors or Co-Sponsors will not serve as a committee member for consideration of the item, and shall not participate in the committee’s discussion of, or action on the item. For purposes of the item, the appointed alternate, who also cannot be an Author or Co-Sponsor, will serve as a committee member in place of the non-participating Author or Co-Sponsor.

III. AGENDA
23City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order d. All three members of a Policy Committee may not be Authors or Co-Sponsors of an item that will be heard by the committee.
e. Only one Author or Co-Sponsor who is not a member of the Policy Committee may attend the committee meeting to participate in discussion of the item. f. If two or more non-committee members are present for any item or meeting, then all non-committee members may act only as observers and may not participate in discussion. If an Author who is not a member of the committee is present to participate in the discussion of their item, no other non-committee member Councilmembers, nor the Mayor, may attend as observers. g. An item may be considered by only one Policy Committee before it goes to the full Council.

4. Functions of the Policy Committees
Committees shall have the following qualities/components:
a. All committees are Brown Act bodies with noticed public meetings and public comment. Regular meeting agendaAgendas will be posted at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting.
b. Minutes shall be available online.
c. Committees shall adopt regular meeting schedules, generally meeting once or twice per month; special meetings may be called when necessary, in accordance with the Brown Act.
d. Generally, meetings will be held at 2180 Milvia Street in publicly accessible meeting rooms that can accommodate the committee members, public attendees, and staff.
e. Members are recommended by the Mayor and approved by the full Council no later than January 31 of each year. Members continue to serve until successors are appointed and approved.
f. Chairs are elected by the Committee at the first regular meeting of the Committee after the annual approval of Committee members by the City Council. In the absence of the Chair, the committee member with the longest tenure on the Council will preside.
g. The Chair, or a quorum of the Committee may call a meeting or cancel a meeting of the Policy Committee.
h. Committees will review items for completeness in accordance with Section III.B.2 of the City Council Rules of Procedure and Order and alignment with Strategic Plan goals.

III. AGENDA
24City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order i. Reports leaving a Policy Committee must adequately include budget implications, administrative feasibility, basic legal concerns, and staff resource demands in order to allow for informed consideration by the full Council. j. Per Brown Act regulations, any revised or supplemental materials must be direct revisions or supplements to the item that was published in the agendaAgenda packetPacket.

Items referred to a Policy Committee from the Agenda & Rules Committee or from the City Council must be agendized for a committee meeting within 60 days of the referral date.

Within 120 days of the referral date, either (1) the committee Chair may accept the Primary Author’s request, either in writing, or in person at a meeting of the committee, that the item remain in committee until a date certain (more than one extension may be requested by the Primary Author); or (2) the committee may vote to send the item to the Agenda & Rules Committee to be placed on a Council Agenda with a Committee recommendation consisting of one of the four options listed below. The Committee Chair shall report any extension granted outside of a meeting to the Committee and the City Clerk by email or verbally at the next Committee meeting.

1. Positive Recommendation (recommending Council pass the item as proposed),

2. Qualified Positive Recommendation (recommending Council pass the item with some changes),

3. Qualified Negative Recommendation (recommending Council reject the item unless certain changes are made) or

4. Negative Recommendation (recommending the item not be approved).

The Policy Committee’s recommendation will be included in a separate section of the report template for that purpose.

A Policy Committee may not refer an item under its consideration to a Ccity board or commission.

The Primary Author of an item referred to a Policy Committee is responsible for revisions and resubmission of the item back to the full Council. Items originating from the City Manager are revised and submitted by the appropriate Ccity staff. Items from Commissions are revised and resubmitted by the members of the Policy Committee. Items and recommendations originating from the Policy Committee are submitted to the City Clerk by the members of the committee.

If a Policy Committee does not take final action by the 120-day deadline, the item is returned to the Agenda & Rules Committee and appears on the next available Council

III. AGENDA
25City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order agendaAgenda. The Agenda & Rules Committee may leave the item on the agendaAgenda under consideration or place it on the next Council agendaAgenda. Items appearing on a City Council agendaAgenda due to lack of action by a Policy Committee may not be referred to a Policy Committee and must remain on the full Council agendaAgenda for consideration.

Policy Committees may add discussion topics that are within their purview to their agendaAgenda with the concurrence of a majority of the Committee. These items are not subject to the 120-day deadline for action.

Once the item is voted out of a Policy Committee, the final item will be resubmitted to the agenda process by the Primary Author, and it will return to the Agenda & Rules Committee on the next available agendaAgenda. The Agenda & Rules Committee may leave the item on the agendaAgenda under consideration or place it on the following Council agendaAgenda. The Agenda & Rules Committee may agendize the item on the Consent Calendar or Action Calendar.Only items that receive a Positive Recommendation can be placed on the Consent Calendar.

The Primary Author may request expedited committee review for items referred to a committee. Criteria for expedited review is generally to meet a deadline for action (e.g. grant deadline, specific event date, etc.). If the committee agrees to the request, the deadline for final committee action is 45 days from the date the committee approves expedited review.

5. Number and Make-up of Policy Committees
Six committees are authorized, each comprised of three Councilmembers, with a fourth Councilmember appointed as an alternate. Each Councilmember and the Mayor will serve on two committees. The Mayor shall be a member of the Agenda and Rules Committee.

The committees are as follows:

1. Agenda and Rules Committee

2. Budget and Finance Committee

3. Facilities, Infrastructure, Transportation, Environment, and Sustainability

4. Health, Life Enrichment, Equity, and Community

5. Land Use, Housing, and Economic Development

6. Public Safety
The Agenda & Rules Committee shall establish the Policy Committee topic groupings, and may adjust said groupings periodically thereafter in order to evenly distribute expected workloads of various committees.

Commented [NML12]: Per discussion at Agenda & Rules
on 7/8/24 to allow for more discretion to place items returning from committee on Consent

III. AGENDA
26City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order All standing Policy Committees of the City Council are considered “legislative bodies” under the Brown Act and must conduct all business in accordance with the Brown Act.

6. Role of City Staff at Committee Meetings
Committees will be staffed by appropriate City Departments and personnel. As part of the committee process, staff will undertake a high-level, preliminary analysis of potential legal issues, costs, timelines, and staffing demands associated with the item. Staff analysis at the Policy Committee level is limited to the points above as the recommendation, program, or project has not yet been approved to proceed by the full Council.

IV. CONDUCT OF MEETING
27City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order IV.CONDUCT OF MEETING
A. Comments from the Public
Public comment will be taken in the following order:
 An initial ten-minute period of public comment on non-agenda items, after the commencement of the meeting and immediately after Ceremonial Matters and City Manager Comments.
 At the first regular meeting of the month, a period of public comment reserved for officially designated representatives of City of Berkeley employee unions, with five minutes allocated per union if representatives of three or fewer unions wish to speak and up to three minutes per union if representatives of four or more unions wish to speak.
 Public comment on the Consent and Information Calendars.  Public comment on the Action Calendar at the onset of the Action calendar with the exception of appeals, public hearings, and quasi-judicial matters requiring public comment for due process purposes (if invoked by the Presiding Officer).
 Public comment on Aaction items by those who did not speak in the earlier Action Calendar public comment period, any appeals, public hearings, and/or other quasi-judicial matters requiring extended public comment for due process purposes as they are taken up under procedures set forth in the sections governing each below.
 Public comment on non-agenda items from any speakers who did not speak during the first round of non-agenda public comment at the beginning of the meeting.

Except in the case of public comment by employee unions, speakers are permitted to yield their time to one other speaker, however no one speaker shall have more than four minutes. A speaker wishing to yield their time shall identify themselves, shall be recognized by the chair, and announce publicly their intention to yield their time. Disabled persons shall have priority seating in the front row of the public seating area.

With respect to public comment by employee unions, each union’s allocated time may be shared between more than one representative, and representatives and other members of unions may speak during other public comment periods in the same manner as members of the public.

If ten or fewer persons are interested in speaking on an individual Actionagenda Iitem, each speaker may speak for two minutes. If there are more than ten persons interested in speaking on an item, the Presiding Officer may limit the public comment for all speakers on the item to one minute per speaker. Speakers are permitted to yield their time to one other speaker, however no one speaker shall have more than four minutes.

Commented [NML13]: Moved here as these rules are
intended to cover all types of public comments
Commented [NML14]: Stated above, no need to repeat.

IV. CONDUCT OF MEETING
28City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order This procedure also applies to public hearings except those types of public hearings specifically provided for in this chapter.section, below.

The Presiding Officer has the discretion to reduce speaker time if needed in order to allow the orderly conduct of the meeting, subject to the consent of a majority of the City Council.

In order to inform members of the public of their place in the speaker's queue, the Presiding Officer will call the names of 5 speakers at a time.

A member of the public may only speak once at public comment on any single item, unless called upon by the Mayor or a Councilmember to answer a specific inquiry, or unless the individual is speaking with respect to a public hearing, a quasi-judicial matter, and/or any other item requiring extended public comment as a matter of due process.

1. Public Comment on Non-Agenda Matters.

Immediately following Ceremonial Matters and the City Manager Comments and prior to reserved public comment by employee unions, up to ten persons will be selected by lottery to address matters not on the Council Aagenda. If five or fewer persons submit speaker cards for the lotteryare identified to provide non-agenda comment, each person selected will be allotted two minutes each. If more than five persons submit speaker cards for the lottery, up to ten persons will beare selected to address matters not on the Council agendaAgenda, and each person selected will be allotted one minute each.

In-person attendeesPersons wishing to address the Council on matters not on the Council agendaAgenda during the initial ten-minute period for such comment, must submit a speaker card to the City Clerk in person at the meeting location and prior to the moment that the Presiding Officer calls for public comment on non- agenda items.commencement of that meeting. Remote attendees must raise their hand in the videoconference application when the Presiding Officer calls for non- agenda speakers. The first five raised hands on the videoconference application will be selected to speak and the first five cards drawn at the meeting will be selected to speak. The number of in-person and remote speakers selected may be adjusted by the Presiding Officer if fewer than five speakers from either format are identified.

The remainder of the speakers wishing to address the Council on non-agenda items will be heard at the end of the agendaAgenda. Speaker cards are not required for this second round of public comment on non-agenda matters.

Persons submitting speaker cards are not required to list their actual name, however they must list some identifying information or alternate name in order to be called to speak.

For the second round of public comment on non-agenda matters, the Presiding Officer retains the authority to limit the number of speakers. by subject. The Presiding Officer will generally request that persons wishing to speak, line up at Commented [NML15]: From Appendix C
Commented [NML16]: From Appendix C
Commented [NML17]: This section moved here to mirror
the order of business on the agenda
Commented [NML18]: Revised to account for hybrid
meetings.

Commented [NML19]: Per discussion at Agenda & Rules
on 7/8/24 to facilitate public participation
Commented [NML20]: Per discussion at Agenda & Rules
on 7/8/24 – not current or even recent practice

IV. CONDUCT OF MEETING
29City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order the podium to be recognized or raise their hand on the videoconference application to determine the number of persons interested in speaking at that time.

Each speaker will be entitled to speak for two minutes each unless the Presiding Officer determines that one-minute is appropriate. given the number of speakers.

Pursuant to this document, no Council meeting shall continue past 11:00 p.m. unless a two-thirds majority of the Council votes to extend the meeting to discuss specified items. If any agendized business remains unfinished at 11:00 p.m. If the meeting is automatically adjourned at 11:00 p.m., or the expiration of any extension after 11:00 p.m., it will be referred to the Agenda & Rules Committee for scheduling pursuant to Chapter II, Section F. In that event, the meeting shall be automatically extended for up to fifteen (15) minutes forto hear public comment on non-agenda items.

2. Public Comment on Consent Calendar and Information Items.

The Council will first determine whether to move items on the agendaAgenda for “Action” or “Information” to the “Consent Calendar,” or move “Consent Calendar” items to “Action.” Items that remain on the “Consent Calendar” are voted on in one motion as a group. “Information” items are not discussed or acted upon at the Council meeting unless they are moved to “Action” or “Consent.” The Council will then take public comment on any items that are either on the amended Consent Calendar or the Information Calendar. A speaker may only speak once during the period for public comment on Consent Calendar and Information items. No additional items can be moved onto the Consent Calendar once public comment has commenced.

At any time during, or immediately after, public comment on Information and Consent items, the Mayor or any Councilmember may move any Information or Consent item to “Action.” Following this, the Council will vote on the items remaining on the Consent Calendar in one motion.

For items moved to the Action Calendar from the Consent Calendar or Information Calendar, persons who spoke on the item during the Consent Calendar public comment period may speak again at the time the matter is taken up during the Action Calendar.

Commented [NML21]: Per discussion at Agenda & Rules
on 7/8/24
Commented [NML22]: Language is simplified and removed
repition from other sections.

IV. CONDUCT OF MEETING
30City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order

3. Public Comment on Action Items.

After the initial ten minutes of public comment on non-agenda items, reserved public comment by employee unions, public comment on Cconsent and iInformation items, and adoption of the Consent Calendar, the public may comment on each remaining item listed on the Agenda for action as the item is taken up.

At the discretion of the Presiding Officer, with the consent of the Council, there may be a public comment period for one or several of the Action Calendar items at the beginning of the Action Calendar. Speaking time during this comment period is subject to the standard rules for public comments in Chapter IV.A. Speakers may speak to multiple items, but may only speak once during this period. This provision is not applicable to the public may comment on each remaining item listed on the agenda for action. Public comment will occur for each Action item— excluding public hearings, appeals, and/or quasi-judicial matters. Attendees that speak on an action item at the scheduled public comment period may not speak again when the action item is taken up by the Council.—in separate but consecutive public comment periods before the Action Calendar is discussed by Council and staff and as the item is taken up. The Presiding Officer will open and close the public comment period for each Action Item, and each period will occur based on the order of the items on the agenda, or based on the discretion of the Presiding Officer.

During the public comment period for each Action Item, the Presiding Officer will request that persons wishing to speak, line up at the podium to be recognized andor raise their hand on the videoconference application to determine the number of persons interested in speaking onat that item.time.

If ten or fewer persons are interested in speaking on an individual Action Item, each speaker may speak for two minutes. If there are more than ten persons interested in speaking on an item, the Presiding Officer may limit the public comment for all speakers on the item to one minute per speaker. Speakers are permitted to yield their time to one other speaker, however no one speaker shall have more than four minutes.

This procedure also applies to public hearings except those types of public hearings specifically provided for in this section, below.

Commented [NML23]: Per discussion at Agenda & Rules
Committee. The Council amended the ROPs in 2023 to create a general Action Calendar public comment period before the Action Calendar is taken up.

This amendment retains the previous change, but makes it discretionary rather than mandatory to allow for better meeting management options.

IV. CONDUCT OF MEETING
31City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order

4. Appeals Appearing on Action Calendar.

With the exception of appeals from decisions of the Zoning Adjustments Board and Landmarks Preservation Commission, appeals from decisions of City commissions appear on the “Action” section of the Council Agenda. Council determines whether to affirm the action of the commission, set a public hearing, or remand the matter to the commission. Appeals of proposed special assessment liens shall also appear on the “Action” section of the Council Agenda.

Appeals from decisions of the Zoning Adjustments Board and Landmarks Preservation Commission are automatically set for public hearing and appear on the “Public Hearings” section of the Council Agenda.

Time shall be provided for public comment for persons representing both sides of the action/appeal and each side will be allocated seven minutes to present their comments on the appeal. Where the appellant is not the applicant, the appellants of a single appeal collectively shall have seven minutes to comment and the applicant shall have seven minutes to comment. If there are multiple appeals filed, each appellant or group of appellants shall have seven minutes to comment.

Where the appellant is the applicant, the applicant/appellant shall have seven minutes to comment and the persons supporting the action of the board or commission on appeal shall have seven minutes to comment. In the case of an appeal of a proposed lien (nuisance abatement/special assessment) lien, the appellant shall have seven minutes to comment.

After the conclusion of the seven-minute comment periods, members of the public may comment on the appeal. Comments from members of the public regarding appeals shall be limited to one minute per speaker. Any person that addressed the Council during one of the seven-minute periods may not speak again during the public comment period on the appeal. Speakers may yield their time to one other speaker, however, no speaker shall have more than two minutes. Each side shall be informed of this public comment procedure at the time the Clerk notifies the parties of the date the appeal will appear on the Council agendaAgenda.

5. Public Comment on Non-Agenda Matters.

Immediately following Ceremonial Matters and the City Manager Comments and prior to reserved public comment by employee unions, persons will be selected by lottery to address matters not on the Council agenda. If five or fewer persons submit speaker cards for the lottery, each person selected will be allotted two minutes each. If more than five persons submit speaker cards for the lottery, up to ten persons will be selected to address matters not on the Council agenda and each person selected will be allotted one minute each. Persons wishing to address the Council on matters not on the Council agenda during the initial ten-minute period for such comment, must submit a speaker card to the City Clerk in person at the meeting location and prior to commencement of that meeting.

The remainder of the speakers wishing to address the Council on non-agenda items will be heard at the end of the agenda. Speaker cards are not required for this second round of public comment on non-agenda matters.

Commented [NML24]: Clarification based on BMC
language
Commented [NML25]: Moved above

IV. CONDUCT OF MEETING
32City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order Persons submitting speaker cards are not required to list their actual name, however they must list some identifying information or alternate name in order to be called to speak.

For the second round of public comment on non-agenda matters, the Presiding Officer retains the authority to limit the number of speakers by subject. The Presiding Officer will generally request that persons wishing to speak, line up at the podium to be recognized to determine the number of persons interested in speaking at that time. Each speaker will be entitled to speak for two minutes each unless the Presiding Officer determines that one-minute is appropriate given the number of speakers.

Pursuant to this document, no Council meeting shall continue past 11:00 p.m. unless a two-thirds majority of the Council votes to extend the meeting to discuss specified items. If any agendized business remains unfinished at 11:00 p.m. or the expiration of any extension after 11:00 p.m., it will be referred to the Agenda & Rules Committee for scheduling pursuant to Chapter II, Section F. In that event, the meeting shall be automatically extended for up to fifteen (15) minutes for public comment on non-agenda items.

6. Ralph M. Brown Act Pertaining to Public Comments.

The Brown Act prohibits the Council from discussing or taking action on an issue raised during Public Comment, unless it is specifically listed on the agendaAgenda.

However, the Council may refer a matter to the City Manager.

B. Consent Calendar
There shall be a Consent Calendar on all regular meeting agendaAgendas on which shall be included those matters which the Mayor, Councilmembers, boards, commissions, City Auditor, and Charter OfficersCity Manager deem to be of such nature that no debate, prolonged discussion, or inquiry will be necessary at the Council meetings. Ordinances for second reading may be included in the Consent Calendar.

It is the policy of the Council that the Mayor or Councilmembers wishing to ask questions concerning Consent Calendar items should ask questions of the contact person identified prior to the Council meeting so that the need for discussion of cConsent cCalendar items can be minimized.

Consent Calendar items may be moved to the Action Calendar by the Council. Action items may be reordered at the discretion of the Chair with the consent of Council.

C. Information Reports Called Up for Discussion
Reports for Information designated for discussion at the request of the Mayor or any Councilmember shall be added to the appropriate section of the Action Calendar and may be acted upon at that meeting or carried over as pending business until discussed or withdrawn. The agendaAgenda will indicate that at the request of the Mayor or any Councilmember a Report for Information may be acted upon by the Council.

Commented [NML26]: Moved to Chapter II.D.

IV. CONDUCT OF MEETING
33City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order D. Written Communications
Written communications from the public will not appear on the Council agendaAgenda as individual matters for discussion but will be distributed as part of the Council agendaAgenda packetPacket with a cover sheet identifying the author and subject matter and will be listed under "Communications." All such communications must have been received by the City Clerk no later than 5:00 p.m. fifteen days prior to the meeting in order to be included on the agendaAgenda.

In instances where an individual forwards more than three pages of email messages not related to actionable items on the Council agendaAgenda to the Council to be reproduced in the "Communications" section of the Council packetPacket, the City Clerk will not reproduce the entire email(s) but instead refer the public to the City's website or a hard copy of the email(s) on file in the City Clerk Department.

All communications shall be simply deemed received without any formal action by the Council. The Mayor or a Councilmember may refer a communication to the City Manager for action, if appropriate, or prepare a cConsent or aAction item for placement on a future agendaAgenda.

Communications related to an item on the agendaAgenda that are received after 5:00 p.m. fifteen days before the meeting are published as provided for in Chapter III.C.4.

E. Public Hearings for Land Use, Zoning, Landmarks, and Public Nuisance Matters
The City Council, in setting the time and place for a public hearing, may limit the amount of time to be devoted to public presentations. Staff shall introduce the public hearing item and present their comments.

Following any staff presentation, and prior to opening the public hearing, each member of the City Council shall verbally disclose all ex parte contacts concerning the subject of the hearing. Members shall also submit a report of such contacts in writing prior to the commencement of the hearing. Such reports shall include a brief statement describing the name, date, place, and content of the contact. Written reports shall be available for public review in the office of the City Clerk prior to the meeting and placed in a file available for public viewing at the meeting.

This is followed by five-minute presentations each by first the appellant and then the applicant. Where the appellant is not the applicant, the appellants of a single appeal collectively shall have five minutes to comment and the applicant shall have five minutes to comment. If there are multiple appeals filed, each appellant or group of appellants shall have five minutes to comment.

Where the appellant is the applicant, the applicant/appellant shall have five minutes to comment and the persons supporting the action of the board or commission on appeal shall have five minutes to comment. In the case of a Commented [NML27]: Codifies long-standing practice

IV. CONDUCT OF MEETING
34City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order public nuisance determination, the representative(s) of the subject property shall have five minutes to present.

The Presiding Officer will request that persons wishing to speak, line up at the podium to be recognized or raise their hand on the videoconference platform,and to determine the number of persons interested in speaking at that time.

If ten or fewer persons are interested in speaking, each speaker may speak for two minutes. If there are more than ten persons interested in speaking, the Presiding Officer may limit the public comment for all speakers to one minute per speaker. Any person that addressed the Council during one of the five-minute periods may not speak again during the public comment period on the appeal. Speakers are permitted to yield their time to one other speaker, however no one speaker shall have more than four minutes. The Presiding Officer may with the consent of persons representing both sides of an issue allocate a block of time to each side to present their issue.

F. Work Sessions
The City Council may schedule a matter for general Council discussion and direction to staff. Official/formal action on a work session item will be scheduled on a subsequent agendaAgenda under the Action portion of the Council agendaAgenda.

In general, public comment at Council work sessions will be heard after the staff presentation, for a limited amount of time to be determined by the Presiding Officer.

The Presiding Officer will request that persons wishing to speak, line up at the podium or raise their hand on the videoconference platform to be recognized and to determine the number of persons interested in speaking at that time. If ten or fewer persons are interested in speaking, each speaker may speak for two minutes. If there are more than ten persons interested in speaking, the Presiding Officer may limit the public comment for all speakers to one minute per speaker. Speakers are permitted to yield their time to one other speaker, however no one speaker shall have more than four minutes.

After Council discussion, if time permits, the Presiding Officer may allow additional public comment. During this time, each speaker will receive one minute. Persons who spoke during the prior public comment time may be permitted to speak again.

G. Protocol
People addressing the Council may first give their name in an audible tone of voice for the record. All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a body and not to any member thereof. No one other than the Council and the person having the floor shall be permitted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through a member of the Council, without the permission of the Presiding Officer. No question shall be asked of a Councilmember except through the Presiding Officer.

V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS
35City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS
A. Persons Authorized to Sit at Tables
No person, except City officials, their representatives and representatives of boards and commissions shall be permitted to sit at the tables in the front of the Council Chambers without the express consent of the Council.

B. Decorum
No person shall disrupt the orderly conduct of the Council meeting. Prohibited disruptive behavior includes but is not limited to shouting, making disruptive noises, such as boos or hisses, creating or participating in a physical disturbance, speaking out of turn or in violation of applicable rules, preventing or attempting to prevent others who have the floor from speaking, preventing others from observing the meeting, entering into or remaining in an area of the meeting room that is not open to the public, or approaching the Council Dais without consent. Any written communications addressed to the Council shall be delivered to the City Clerk for distribution to the Council.

C. Enforcement of Decorum
When the public demonstrates a lack of order and decorum, the presiding officer shall call for order and inform the person(s) that the conduct is violating the Rules of Order and Procedure and provide a warning to the person(s) to cease the disruptive behavior. Should the person(s) fail to cease and desist the disruptive conduct, the Ppresiding Oofficer may call a five (5) minute recess to allow the disruptions to cease.

If the meeting cannot be continued due to continued disruptive conduct, the presiding officer may have any law enforcement officer on duty remove or place any person who violates the order and decorum of the meeting under arrest and cause that person to be prosecuted under the provisions of applicable law.

D. Precedence of Motions
When a question or motion is before the Council, no motion shall be entertained except:

1. To adjourn;

2. To fix the hour of adjournment;

3. To lay on the table;

4. For the previous question;

5. To postpone to a certain day;

6. To refer;

7. To amend;

8. To substitute; and

9. To postpone indefinitely.

V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS
36City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order These motions shall have precedence in order indicated. Any such motion, except a motion to amend or substitute, shall be put to a vote without debate.

E. Robert’s Rules of Order
Robert’s Rules of Order have been adopted by the City Council and apply in all cases except the precedence of motions in Section V.D shall supersede.

F. Rules of Debate

1. Presiding Officer May Debate.

The presiding officer may debate from the chair; subject only to such limitations of debate as are by these rules imposed on all members, and shall not be deprived of any of the rights and privileges as a member of the Council by reason of that person acting as the presiding officer.

2. Getting the Floor - Improper References to be avoided.

Members desiring to speak shall address the Chair, and upon recognition by the presiding officer, shall confine themself to the question under debate.

3. Interruptions.

A member, once recognized, shall not be interrupted when speaking unless it is to call a member to order, or as herein otherwise provided. If a member, while speaking, were called to order, that member shall cease speaking until the question of order is determined, and, if in order, the member shall be permitted to proceed.

4. Privilege of Closing Debate.

The Mayor or Councilmember moving the adoption of an ordinance or resolution shall have the privilege of closing the debate. When a motion to call a question is passed, the Mayor or Councilmember moving adoption of an ordinance, resolution or other action shall have three minutes to conclude the debate.

5. Motion to Reconsider.

A motion to reconsider any action taken by the Council may be made only during the same session such action is taken. It may be made either immediately during the same session, or at a recessed or adjourned session thereof. Such motion must be made by a member on the prevailing side, and may be made at any time and have precedence over all other motions or while a member has the floor; it shall be debatable. Nothing herein shall be construed to prevent any member of the Council from making or remaking the same or other motion at a subsequent meeting of the Council.

6. Repeal or Amendment of Action Requiring a Vote of Two-Thirds of Council, or Greater.

Any ordinance or resolution which is passed and which, as part of its terms, requires a vote of two-thirds of the Council or more in order to pass a motion pursuant to such an ordinance or resolution, shall require the vote of the same percent of the Council to repeal or amend the ordinance or resolution.

V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS
37City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order G. Debate Limited

1. Consideration of each matter coming before the Council shall be limited to 20 minutes from the time the matter is first taken up, at the end of which period consideration of such matter shall terminate and the matter shall be dropped to the foot of the agenda, immediately ahead of Information Reports; provided that either of the following two not debatable motions shall be in order:
a) A motion to extend consideration which, if passed, shall commence a new twenty-minute period for consideration; or
b) If there are one or more motions on the floor, a motion for the previous question, which, if passed by a 2/3 vote, shall require an immediate vote on pending motions.

2. The time limit set forth in subparagraph 1 hereof shall not be applicable to any public hearing, public discussion, Council discussion or other especially set matter for which a period of time has been specified (in which case such specially set time shall be the limit for consideration) or which by applicable law (e.g. hearings of appeals, etc.), the matter must proceed to its conclusion.

3. In the interest of expediting the business of the City, failure by the Chair or any Councilmember to call attention to the expiration of the time allowed for consideration of a matter, by point of order or otherwise, shall constitute unanimous consent to the continuation of consideration of the matter beyond the allowed time; provided, however, that the Chair or any Councilmember may at any time thereafter call attention to the expiration of the time allowed, in which case the Council shall proceed to the next item of business, unless one of the motions referred to in Section D hereof is made and is passed.

H. Motion to Lay on Table
A motion to lay on the table shall preclude all amendments or debate of the subject under consideration. If the motion shall prevail, the consideration of the subject may be resumed only upon a motion of a member voting with the majority and with consent of two-thirds of the members present.

I. Division of Question
If the question contains two or more propositions, which can be divided, the presiding officer may, and upon request of a member shall, divide the same.

J. Addressing the Council
Under the following headings of business, unless the presiding officer rules otherwise, any interested person shall have the right to address the Council in accordance with the following conditions and upon obtaining recognition by the presiding officer:

1. Written Communications.

Interested parties or their authorized representatives may address the Council in the form of written communications in regard to matters of concern to them by

V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS
38City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order submitting their written communications at the meeting, or prior to the meeting pursuant to the deadlines in Chapter III.C.4.

2. Public Hearings.

Interested persons or their authorized representatives may address the Council by reading protests, petitions, or communications relating to matters then under consideration.

3. Public Comment.

Interested persons may address the Council on any issue concerning City business during the period assigned to Public Comment.

K. Addressing the Council After Motion Made
When a motion is pending before the Council, no person other than the Mayor or a Councilmember shall address the Council without first securing the permission of the presiding officer or Council to do so.

L. Use of Cellular Phones and Electronic Devices
The use of cell phones during City Council meetings is discouraged for the Mayor and Councilmembers. While communications regarding Council items should be minimized, personal communications between family members and/or caregivers can be taken outside in the case of emergencies. In order to acknowledge differences in learning styles and support tactile learners, note-taking can continue to be facilitated both with a pen and paper and/or on electronic devices such as laptop computers and tablets.

The use of cell phones during Closed Session Meetings is explicitly prohibited for the Mayor and Councilmembers.

VI. FACILITIES
39City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order VI.FACILITIES
A. Meeting Location Capacity
Attendance at Ccouncil meetings shall be limited to the posted seating capacity of the meeting location. Entrance to the meeting location will be appropriately regulated by the City Manager on occasions when capacity is likely to be exceeded. While the Council is in session, members of the public shall not remain standing in the meeting room except to address the Council, and sitting on the floor shall not be permitted.

B. Alternate Facilities for Council Meetings
The City Council shall approve in advance a proposal that a Council meeting be held at a facility other than the School District Board Room.

If the City Manager has reason to anticipate that the attendance for a meeting will be substantially greater than the capacity of the Board Room and insufficient time exists to secure the approval of the City Council to hold the meeting at an alternate facility, the City Manager shall make arrangements for the use of a suitable alternate facility to which such meeting may be recessed and moved, if the City Council authorizes the action.

If a suitable alternate facility is not available, the City Council may reschedule the matter to a date when a suitable alternate facility will be available.

Alternate facilities are to be selected from those facilities previously approved by the City Council as suitable for meetings away from the Board Room.

C. Amplified Sound, Signs, Objects, and Symbolic Materials Amplified sound devices such as bullhorns, megaphones, portable sound systems, and similar devices are prohibited within the meeting location during Council meetings.

Objects and symbolic materials such as signs and banners are permitted in the meeting location provided that they do not interfere with the cameras that broadcast the meeting, obstruct the view of other attendees, or create a fire or safety hazard.

Any type of stick, pole, or similar object is prohibited in the meeting location during Council meetings.

D. Fire Safety
Exits shall not be obstructed in any manner. Obstructions, including storage, shall not be placed in aisles or other exit ways. Hand carried items must be stored so that such items do not inhibit passage in aisles or other exit ways. Attendees are strictly prohibited from sitting in aisles and/or exit ways. Exit ways shall not be used in any way that will present a hazardous condition.

E. Overcrowding
Admittance of persons beyond the approved capacity of a place of assembly is prohibited. When the meeting location has reached the posted maximum capacity, additional attendees shall be directed to the designated overflow area.

VI. FACILITIES
40City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order F. Format of Meetings
The City Council may conduct regular meetings or special meetings held at the School District Boardroom in the hybrid format with both in-person and virtual participation as provided for in the Brown Act, and as noticed on the meeting Agenda. Council meetings at other locations may be conducted in the hybrid format if technologically feasible.

Commented [NML28]: Per Council direction on 5/7/24

APPENDIX A. POLICY FOR NAMING AND RENAMING PUBLIC FACILITIES 41City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order APPENDIX A. POLICY FOR NAMING AND RENAMING PUBLIC

FACILITIES
Purpose
To establish a uniform policy regarding the naming and renaming of existing and future parks, streets, pathways and other public facilities.

Objective
A. To ensure that naming public facilities (such as parks, streets, recreation facilities, pathways, open spaces, public building, bridges or other structures) will enhance the values and heritage of the City of Berkeley and will be compatible with community interest.

Section 1 – Lead Commission
The City Council designates the following commissions as the ‘Lead Commissions’ in overseeing, evaluating, and ultimately advising the Council in any naming or renaming of a public facility. The lead commission shall receive and coordinate comment and input from other Commissions and the public as appropriate.

Board of Library Trustees
Parks, and Recreation & Waterfront Commission – Parks, recreation centers, camps, plazas, and public open spaces, and public facilities within the area of the City known as the Waterfront, as described in BMC 3.36.060.B.

Transportation and Infrastructure Public Works Commission – Public buildings (other than recreation centers), streets and bridges or other structures in the public thoroughfare.

Waterfront Commission –Public facilities within the area of the City known as the Waterfront, as described in BMC 3.36.060.B.

Section 2 – General Policy
A. Newly acquired or developed public facilities shall be named immediately after acquisition or development to ensure appropriate public identity.

B. No public facility may be named for a living person, but this policy can be overridden with a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

C. Public facilities that are renamed must follow the same criteria for naming new facilities.

In addition, the historical significance and geographical reference of the established name should be considered when weighing and evaluating any name change.

D. The City encourages the recognition of individuals for their service to the community in ways that include the naming of activities such as athletic events, cultural presentations, or annual festivals, which do not involve the naming or renaming of public facilities.

E. Unless restricted by covenant, facilities named after an individual should not necessarily be considered a perpetual name.

Section 3 – Criteria for Naming of Public Facilities
When considering the naming of a new public facility or an unnamed portion or feature within an already named public facility (such as a room within the facility or a feature within an Commented [NML29]: Moved above due to commission
consolidation

APPENDIX A. POLICY FOR NAMING AND RENAMING PUBLIC FACILITIES 42City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order established park), or, the renaming of an existing public facility the following criteria shall be applied:

A. Public Facilities are generally easier to identify by reference to adjacent street names, distinct geographic or environmental features, or primary use activity. Therefore, the preferred practice is to give City-owned property a name of historical or geographical significance and to retain these names.

B. No public facility may be named for a living person, but this policy can be overridden with a 2/3 vote of the City Council.

C. The naming of a public facility or any parts thereof in recognition of an individual posthumously may only be considered if the individual had a positive effect on the community and has been deceased for more than 1 year.

D. When a public facility provides a specific programmatic activity, it is preferred that the activity (e.g. skateboard park, baseball diamond) be included in the name of the park or facility.

E. When public parks are located adjacent to elementary schools, a name that is the same as the adjacent school shall be considered.

F. When considering the renaming of an existing public facility, in addition to applying criteria A-E above, proper weight should be given to the fact that: a name lends a site or property authenticity and heritage; existing names are presumed to have historic significance; and historic names give a community a sense of place and identity, continuing through time, and increases the sense of neighborhood and belonging.

Section 4 –Naming Standards Involving a Major Contribution When a person, group or organization requests the naming or renaming of a public facility, all of the following conditions shall be met:

A. An honoree will have made a major contribution towards the acquisition and/or development costs of a public facility or a major contribution to the City.

B. The honoree has a record of outstanding service to their community C. Conditions of any donation that specifies that name of a public facility, as part of an agreement or deed, must be approved by the City Council, after review by and upon recommendation of the City Manager.

Section 5 –Procedures for Naming or Renaming of Public Facilities A. Any person or organization may make a written application to the City Manager requesting that a public facility or portion thereof, be named or renamed.

1. Recommendations may also come directly of the City Boards or Commissions, the City Council, or City Staff.

B. The City Manager shall refer the application to the appropriate lead commission as defined in Section 1 of the City’s policy on naming of public facilities, for that commission’s review, facilitation, and recommendation of disposition.

1. The application shall contain the name or names of the persons or organization making the application and the reason for the requested naming or renaming.

C. The lead commission shall review and consider the application, using the policies and criteria articulated to the City Policy on Naming and Renaming to make a recommendation to Council.

1. All recommendations or suggestion will be given the same consideration without regard to the source of the nomination

APPENDIX A. POLICY FOR NAMING AND RENAMING PUBLIC FACILITIES 43City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order D. The lead commission shall hold a public hearing and notify the general public of any discussions regarding naming or renaming of a public facility.

1. Commission action will be taking at the meeting following any public hearing on the naming or renaming.

E. The commission’s recommendation shall be forwarded to Council for final consideration.

The City of Berkeley Policy for Naming and Renaming Public Facilities was adopted by the Berkeley City Council at the regular meeting of January 31, 2012.

APPENDIX B. GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING AND WRITING COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS 44City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order APPENDIX B. GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING AND WRITING COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEMS
These guidelines are derived from the requirements for Agenda items listed in the Berkeley City Council Rules of Procedure and Order, Chapter III, Sections B(1) and (2), reproduced below. In addition, Chapter III Section C(1)(a) of the Rules of Procedure and Order allows the Agenda & Rules Committee to request that the Primary Author of an item provide “additional analysis” if the item as submitted evidences a “significant lack of background or supporting information” or “significant grammatical or readability issues.”
These guidelines provide a more detailed and comprehensive overview of elements of a complete Council item. While not all elements would be applicable to every type of Agenda item, they are intended to prompt Authors to consider presenting items with as much relevant information and analysis as possible.

Chapter III, Sections (B)(1) and (2) of Council Rules of Procedure and Order:

2. Agenda items shall contain all relevant documentation, including the following as Applicable:
a. A descriptive title that adequately informs the public of the subject matter and general nature of the item or report and action requested; b. Whether the matter is to be presented on the Consent Calendar or the Action Calendar or as a Report for Information;
c. Recommendation of the City Manager, if applicable (these provisions shall not apply to Mayor and Council items.);
d. Fiscal impacts of the recommendation;
e. A description of the current situation and its effects; f. Background information as needed;
g. Rationale for recommendation;
h. Alternative actions considered;
i. For awards of contracts; the abstract of bids and the Affirmative Action Program of the low bidder in those cases where such is required (these provisions shall not apply to Mayor and Council items.); j. Person or persons to contact for further information, with telephone number.

If the Primary Author of any report believes additional background information, beyond the basic report, is necessary to Council understanding of the subject, a separate compilation of such background information may be developed and copies will be available for Council and for public review in the City Clerk Department, and the City Clerk shall provide limited distribution of such background information depending upon quantity of pages to be duplicated. In such case the agenda item distributed with the packet shall so indicate.

APPENDIX B. GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING AND WRITING COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS 45City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order Guidelines for City Council Items:

1. Title

2. Consent/Action/Information Calendar

3. Recommendation

4. Summary Statement/Current situation and its effects

5. Background

6. Review of Existing Plans, Programs, Policies and Laws

7. Actions/Alternatives Considered

8. Consultation/Outreach Overview and Results

9. Rationale for Recommendation

10.Implementation, Administration and Enforcement

11.Environmental Sustainability

12.Fiscal Impacts

13.Outcomes and Evaluation

14.Contact Information

15.Attachments/Supporting Materials
___________________________________________________

1. Title
A descriptive title that adequately informs the public of the subject matter and general nature of the item or report and action requested.

2. Consent/Action/Information Calendar
Whether the matter is to be presented on the Consent Calendar or the Action Calendar or as a Report for Information.

3. Recommendation
Clear, succinct statement of action(s) to be taken. Recommendations can be further detailed within the item, by specific reference.

Common action options include:
● Adopt first reading of ordinance
● Adopt a resolution
● Referral to the City Manager (City Manager decides if it is a short term referral or is placed on the RRV ranking list)
● Direction to the City Manager (City Manager is directed to execute the recommendation right away, it is not placed on any referral list) ● Referral to a Commission or to a Standing or Ad Hoc Council Committee ● Referral to the budget process
● Send letter of support
● Accept, Approve, Modify or Reject a recommendation from a Commission or Committee
● Designate members of the Council to perform some action

APPENDIX B. GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING AND WRITING COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS 46City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order

4. Summary Statement/ “Current situation and its effects” A short resume of the circumstances that give rise to the need for the recommended action(s).
● Briefly state the opportunity/problem/concern that has been identified, and the proposed solution.
● Example (fictional):

Winter rains are lasting longer than expected. Berkeley’s winter shelters are poised to close in three weeks, but forecasts suggest rain for another two months. If they do not remain open until the end of the rainy season, hundreds of people will be left in the rain 24/7. Therefore, this item seeks authorization to keep Berkeley’s winter shelters open until the end of April, and refers to the Budget Process $40,000 to cover costs of an additional two months of shelter operations.

5. Background
A full discussion of the history, circumstances and concerns to be addressed by the item.
● For the above fictional example, Background would include information and data about the number and needs of homeless individuals in Berkeley, the number and availability of permanent shelter beds that meet their needs, the number of winter shelter beds that would be lost with closure, the impacts of such closure on this population, the weather forecasts, etc.

6. Review of Existing Plans, Programs, Policies and Laws Review, identify and discuss relevant/applicable Plans, Programs, Policies and Laws, and how the proposed actions conform with, compliment, are supported by, differ from or run contrary to them. What gaps were found that need to be filled? What existing policies, programs, plans and laws need to be changed/supplemented/improved/repealed? What is missing altogether that needs to be addressed?
Review of all pertinent/applicable sections of:
● The City Charter
● Berkeley Municipal Code
● Administrative Regulations
● Council Resolutions
● Staff training manuals
Review of all applicable City Plans:
● The General Plan
● Area Plans
● The Climate Action Plan
● Resilience Plan
● Equity Plan

APPENDIX B. GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING AND WRITING COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS 47City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order ● Capital Improvements Plan
● Zero Waste Plan
● Bike Plan
● Pedestrian Plan
● Other relevant precedents and plans
Review of the City’s Strategic Plan
Review of similar legislation previously introduced/passed by Council Review of County, State and Federal laws/policies/programs/plans, if applicable

7. Actions/Alternatives Considered
● What solutions/measures have other jurisdictions adopted that serve as models/cautionary tales?
● What solutions/measures are recommended by advocates, experts, organizations?
● What is the range of actions considered, and what are some of their major pros and cons?
● Why were other solutions not as feasible/advisable?

8. Consultation/Outreach Overview and Results
● Review/list external and internal stakeholders that were consulted ○ External: constituents, communities, neighborhood organizations, businesses and not for profits, advocates, people with lived experience, faith organizations, industry groups, people/groups that might have concerns about the item, etc.
○ Internal: staff who would implement policies, the City Manager and/or dDeputy CM, Department Heads, City Attorney, City Clerk, etc. ● What reports, articles, books, websites and other materials were consulted? ● What was learned from these sources?
● What changes or approaches did they advocate for that were accepted or rejected?

9. Rationale for Recommendation
A clear and concise statement as to whether the item proposes actions that:
● Conform to, clarify or extend existing Plans, Programs, Policies and Laws ● Change/Amend existing Plans, Programs, Policies and Laws in minor ways ● Change/Amend existing Plans, Programs, Policies and Laws in major ways ● Create an exception to existing Plans, Programs, Policies and Laws ● Reverse/go contrary to or against existing Plans, Programs, Policies and Laws
Argument/summary of argument in support of recommended actions. The argument likely has already been made via the information and analysis already presented,

APPENDIX B. GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPING AND WRITING COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS 48City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order but should be presented/restated/summarized. Plus, further elaboration of terms for recommendations, if any.

10.Implementation, Administration and Enforcement
Discuss how the recommended action(s) would be implemented, administered and enforced. What staffing (internal or via contractors/consultants) and materials/facilities are likely required for implementation?

11.Environmental Sustainability and Climate Impacts
Discuss the impacts of the recommended action(s), if any, on the environment and the recommendation’s positive and/or negative implications with respect to the City’s Climate Action, Resilience, and other sustainability goals.

12.Fiscal Impacts
Review the recommended action’s potential to generate funds or savings for the City in the short and long-term, as well as the potential direct and indirect costs.

13.Outcomes and Evaluation
State the specific outcomes expected, if any (i.e., “it is expected that 100 homeless people will be referred to housing every year”) and what reporting or evaluation is recommended.

14.Contact Information

15.Attachments/Supporting Materials

APPENDIX C
49City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order APPENDIX C. TEMPORARY RULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF CITY

COUNCIL MEETINGS THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE DURING THE
COVID-19 EMERGENCY
Mayor and Councilmember Speaking Time on Agenda Items
For the Consent Calendar, the Mayor and Councilmembers will initially have up to five minutes each to make comments. After all members of the Council have spoken (or passed) and after public comment, members will each have two additional minutes to discuss the Consent Calendar.

For non-Consent items, the Mayor and Councilmembers will have two minutes each to make initial comments on an agenda item, except for the author of an agenda item who will have five minutes to initially present the item. After every Councilmember has spoken or declined and after public comment, Councilmembers will each have another five minutes per person to address an item. Debate may be extended beyond a second round of Council comments by a majority vote (5 votes).

Time will toll during staff answers to questions; Councilmembers are urged to ask their questions of city staff before the meeting or in writing.

Procedure for Pulling Items from Consent or Information Calendar Three (3) members of the City Council must agree to pull an item from the Consent or Information Calendar for it to move to Action. Absent three members concurring, the item will stay on Consent or Information Calendar and, with respect to Consent items, the Mayor or Councilmembers will be allowed to record their aye, nay or abstain votes on individual items or the entire Consent Calendar.

Moving an item from the Action Calendar to the Consent Calendar requires the unanimous consent of the entire City Council.

Public Comment Speaking Time
With the exception of prescribed times in the Rules of Procedure for public hearings and public comment by employee unions, the amount of time for each speaker during public comment is limited to two minutes maximum and that speakers can only address an agenda item once, however the Presiding Officer has the discretion to reduce speaker time if needed in order to allow the orderly conduct of the meeting, subject to the consent of a majority of the City Council. Speakers may yield their time for a maximum of four minutes per individual. If a speaker wishes to yield their time, they must indicate so when called on by the Presiding Officer and state who they are yielding their speaker time to. The Presiding Officer will keep a list with the names and amount of time yielded to individuals.

In order to inform members of the public of their place in the speaker's queue, the Presiding Officer will call the names of 5 speakers at a time.

Public Comment on Non-Agenda Matters will be conducted in the order of hands raised on the Zoom platform, and will be limited to either the first 10 speakers during the initial round of Non-Agenda public comment, as well as all hands raised during the closing round of Non-Agenda public comment at the conclusion to the meeting, until such time that the Commented [NML30]: Relevant portions have been moved
to the body of the document.

Commented [NML31]: Relevant portions have been moved
to the body for the Rules of Procedure.

Commented [NML32]: This paragraph is only applicable to virtual-only meetings, which are currently not permitted under the Brown Act.

APPENDIX C
50City of Berkeley Council Rules of Procedure and Order meeting adjourns. If there are five or fewer speakers with hands raised for Public Comment on Non-Agenda Matters, each speaker will have two minutes to address the City Council. If there are more than five speakers with their hands raised then speaker time will be limited to one minute per person. The procedure for selection of Non-Agenda speakers prescribed in the Rules of Procedure by random draw is suspended for videoconference meetings where there is no physical meeting location.

Office of the City Manager
2180 Milvia Street, Berkeley, CA 94704 ● Tel: (510) 981-7000 ● TDD: (510) 981-6903 ● Fax: (510) 981-7099 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: https://berkeleyca.gov/

CONSENT CALENDAR
October 29, 2024
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Paul Buddenhagen, City Manager
Submitted by: Henry Oyekanmi, Director, Finance
Subject: Formal Bid Solicitations and Request for Proposals Scheduled for Possible Issuance After Council Approval on October 29, 2024

RECOMMENDATION
Approve the request for proposals or invitation for bids (attached to staff report) that will be, or are planned to be, issued upon final approval by the requesting department or division. All contracts over the City Manager’s threshold will be returned to Council for final approval.

FISCAL IMPACTS OF RECOMMENDATION
Total estimated cost of items included in this report is $3,680,284 PROJECT Fund Source Amount
Martin Luther King Jr. Youth
Services Center/Young Adult
Project (YAP) Public Art Project
511
148
T1-CAPITAL
CULT TRST $396,000
Strawberry Creek Culvert Repairs
127
130
134
501
CAP - INFR - ROADWAY/STREETS $3,284,284
Total: $3,680,284

CURRENT SITUATION AND ITS EFFECTS
On May, 6, 2008, Council adopted Ordinance No. 7,035-N.S. effective June 6, 2008, which increased the City Manager’s purchasing authority for services to $50,000. As a result, this required report submitted by the City Manager to Council is now for those purchases in excess of $100,000 for goods; and $200,000 for playgrounds and construction; and $50,000 for services. If Council does not object to these items being sent out for bid or proposal within one week of them appearing on the agenda, and upon final notice to proceed from the requesting department, the IFB (Invitation for Bid) or RFP (Request for Proposal) may be released to the public and notices sent to the potential bidder/respondent list.

03

Formal Bid Solicitations and Request for Proposals
Scheduled for Possible Issuance After Council
Approval on October 29, 2024 CONSENT CALENDAR
October 29, 2024

BACKGROUND
On May 6, 2008, Council adopted Ordinance No. 7,035-N.S., amending the City Manager’s purchasing authority for services

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE IMPACTS
The Finance Department reviews all formal bid and proposal solicitations to ensure that they include provisions for compliance with the City’s environmental policies. For each contract that is subject to City Council authorization, staff will address environmental sustainability considerations in the associated staff report to City Council.

RATIONALE FOR RECOMMENDATION
Need for the goods and/or services.

ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS CONSIDERED
None.

CONTACT PERSON
Clayton Stilwell, General Services Manager, Finance, 510-981-7329 Attachments:

1. Martin Luther King Jr. Youth Services Center/Young Adult Project (YAP) Public Art Project

2. Strawberry Creek Culvert Repairs
Note: Original of this attachment with live signature of authorizing personnel is on file in General Services.

NEXT 30 DAYS
DATE SUBMITTED: OCTOBER 29, 2024
Attachment 1

SPECIFICATION
NO.

DESCRIPTION OF

GOODS /

SERVICES BEING

PURCHASED
APPROX. RELEASE
DATE
APPROX. BID

OPENING DATE

INTENDED USE ESTIMATED COST BUDGET CODE TO BE

CHARGED
DEPT. / DIVISION CONTACT NAME
& PHONE
25-11686-C Martin Luther King Jr.

Youth Services
Center/Young Adult
Project (YAP) Public
Art Project
November-24 January-24 This opportunity is for an artist to create a large-scale mosaic artwork
located at the entryway (exterior
wall) and lobby (interior wall) of the
Center, measuring approximately
884 square feet.
$ 396,000 511-21-208-252-0000-
000-446-612990
and
148-21-208-252-0000-
000-446-612990-
46-612990-
CMO/OED/Civic Arts Mark Salinas, Public
Art Program Lead,
msalinas@berkeley
ca.gov
DEPT. TOTAL $ 396,000
25-11689-C Strawberry Creek
Culvert Repairs
October 24, 2024 November 21, 2024 Concrete Repairs & Concrete lining for the underground
Culvert rehabilitation $2,050,000
$99,004
$115,000
$1,020,280
Total: $3,284,284
127
127-54-623-674-0000-
000-431-665110
130-54-623-673-0000-
000-431-665110
134-54-623-674-0000-
000-431-665110
501-54-623-673-0000-
000-431-665110
•    PWENSD2305
"Public Works/
Engineering"
"Ricardo Salcedo:
6407
Srinivas Muktevi:
6402"
DEPT. TOTAL $ 3,284,284
TOTAL $ 3,680,284
1 of  1

Office of the City Manager
2180 Milvia Street, Berkeley, CA 94704 ● Tel: (510) 981-7000 ● TDD: (510) 981-6903 ● Fax: (510) 981-7099 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: https://berkeleyca.gov/

CONSENT CALENDAR
October 29, 2024
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Paul Buddenhagen, City Manager
Submitted by: David Sprague, Fire Chief
Subject: Purchase Order: ZOLL Medical Corporation for ECG Monitor/Defibrillators

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Purchase Order and any amendments with ZOLL Medical Corporation to purchase a new fleet of 40 Advanced Life Support (ALS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Monitor/Defibrillators, associated equipment and maintenance in an amount not to exceed $2,832,950 for not more than seven (7) years.

FISCAL IMPACTS OF RECOMMENDATION
All funds required to pay for this purchase are in the Department’s baseline operating budget. Funding sources include but are not limited to Measure GG, Measure FF, UC Settlement, and the General Fund.

CURRENT SITUATION AND ITS EFFECTS
The current fleet of Advanced Life Support (ALS) ECG Monitor/Defibrillators has reached the end of its service life and needs to be replaced. The fleet of apparatus that require monitors has expanded; the Department is running multiple entry level academies for the new City classification of Paramedic, each of which require the dedication of four monitors; and the Department is now outfitting all reserve apparatus with the equipment they need to be placed in-service. Each responding paramedic staffed apparatus (fire engine, fire truck and ambulance) is required by the Alameda County Local EMS Authority (LEMSA) to carry an ALS ECG Monitor / Defibrillator. The Department currently carries ZOLL ECG’s on every piece of suppression and transport apparatus to meet this requirement. The Department has used the Zoll ALS ECG Monitor/Defibrillators since 2017.

The cooperative purchasing entity Sourcewell, a State of Minnesota local government unit and service cooperative, opened (RFP #041823) on April 18th, 2023 to procure “Critical Care and EMS Equipment” for use by its participating entities. The published Request for Proposal (RFP) allows for participating entities, such as the City of Berkeley, to utilized Sourcewell’s RFP to “piggy-back” off the resulting agreement. A

04

Purchase Order: ZOLL Medical Corporation for ECG Monitor/Defibrillators CONSENT CALENDAR October 29, 2024

contract was awarded to ZOLL on October 10th, 2023. The City will piggyback on the Sourcewell contract with ZOLL Medical for ECG Monitor/Defibrillators.

BACKGROUND
In 2017 the Fire Department (Department) conducted a comprehensive Request for Proposal (RFP) process and selected ZOLL Medical Corporation. On May 2, 2017 the City Council approved resolution #69-933-N.S. to execute a Purchase Order and any amendments with ZOLL Medical Corporation for the purchase and maintenance of twenty-six Advanced Life Support (ALS) ECG Monitor/Defibrillators for emergency response vehicles in an amount not to exceed $780,491.

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE IMPACTS
There are no identifiable environmental effects or opportunities associated with the action requested in this report.

RATIONALE FOR RECOMMENDATION
A competitive process was conducted by Sourcewell. The Zoll monitors have performed well and there is no reason to conduct a separate solicitation.

ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS CONSIDERED
None.

CONTACT PERSON
David Sprague, Fire Chief, (510) 981-3473
Attachments:
1: Resolution

RESOLUTION NO. ##,###-N.S.

PURCHASE ORDER: ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION FOR ECG

MONITOR/DEFIBRILLATORS
WHEREAS, in 2017 the Fire Department (Department) conducted a comprehensive Request for Proposal (RFP) process and selected ZOLL Medical Corporation, and WHEREAS, on May 2, 2017 the City Council approved resolution #69-933-N.S. to execute a Purchase Order and any amendments with ZOLL Medical Corporation for the purchase and maintenance of twenty-six Advanced Life Support (ALS) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Monitor/Defibrillators for emergency response vehicles, and WHEREAS, the Fire Department’s current fleet of ALS ECG Monitor/ Defibrillators have reached the end of their service life, thus necessitating replacement, and WHEREAS, each responding paramedic apparatus is required by the Alameda County Local EMS Authority (LEMSA) to carry an ECG Monitor / Defibrillator, and WHEREAS, Sourcewell opened RFP #041823 on April 18, 2023 to procure Critical Care and EMS Equipment, and
WHEREAS, the Sourcewell Request for Proposal (RFP) contained provisions that permitted all members of Sourcwell to “piggy-back” off the resulting agreement, and WHEREAS, a contract was awarded to ZOLL on October 10th, 2023.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Berkeley that the City Manager is authorized to execute a Purchase Order and any amendments with ZOLL Medical Corporation to purchase a new fleet of 40 Advanced Life Support (ALS) ECG Monitor/Defibrillators, associated equipment and maintenance in an amount not to exceed $2,832,950 for not more than seven (7) years.

Office of the City Manager
2180 Milvia Street, Berkeley, CA 94704 ● Tel: (510) 981-7000 ● TDD: (510) 981-6903 ● Fax: (510) 981-7099 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: https://berkeleyca.gov/

CONSENT CALENDAR
October 29, 2024
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Paul Buddenhagen, City Manager
Submitted by: Scott Gilman, Director, Health, Housing, and Community Services Subject: Contract: Berkeley Food Network for Berkeley-Based Food Assistance

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a contract and any amendments or extensions with Berkeley Food Network to provide food assistance to low-income households in Berkeley in an amount not to exceed $400,000 for the period December 2, 2024 through June 30, 2026.

FISCAL IMPACTS OF RECOMMENDATION
Through a competitive Request for Proposal (RFP) process, staff have selected Berkeley Food Network to provide food assistance to low income Berkeley residents.

This RFP process was initiated by a referral from Council on June 25, 2024 to identify a Berkeley-based vendor to provide food assistance to food insecure households. The City conducted an RFP process and received three proposals. Berkeley Food Network was selected as the highest scoring bidder, and submitted a revised quote with final pricing. The contract will have a total not to exceed amount of $400,000. Funding is available in the FY 2024 budget in the Aging Services General Fund (Fund 011).

CURRENT SITUATION AND ITS EFFECTS
On June 25, 2024, Council voted to refer to the City Manager to develop and fund a Request for Proposal process to support Berkeley-based food non-profit food assistance providers serving food insecure households.

The Oakland-based Alameda County Community Food Bank (ACCFB), which partners with more than 400 institutions to provide food assistance to Alameda County families and individuals, reports an increase in demand throughout the county. The ACCFB went from distributing 38 million pounds of food pre-COVID pandemic, to 58 million pounds of food most recently.1 As of October 30, 2023, approximately 8.9 percent of Alameda County adults, lived in households experiencing food insufficiency.2 1 Alameda County Community Food Back: https://www.accfb.org/about-us/what-we-do/ 2 California Pulse Website for Alameda County: https://stanford-datalab.github.io/covid-19- ca/alameda/#foodinsufficiency

05

Contract: Berkeley Food Network for Berkeley Based Food Assistance CONSENT CALENDAR October 29, 2024

BACKGROUND
The City released an RFP under Specification No. 25-11675-C and convened a panel of stakeholders to select Berkeley Food Network as the most responsive and responsible bidder for this contract.

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE IMPACTS
There are no identifiable environmental effect
s, climate impacts, or sustainability
opportunities associated with the subject of this report.

RATIONALE FOR RECOMMENDATION
Berkeley Food Network is a well-respected Berkeley-based non-profit food provider with demonstrated expertise on food distribution to low-income residents and households.

Their proposal in response to RFP Specification No. 25-11675-C includes high quality services that aligns with the intended goals of maximizing program objectives.

ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS CONSIDERED
Staff did not identify an alternative action consistent with the City’s goals of advancing equity in the community. Failure to proceed with the recommendation would result in a local provider’s inability to sustain, and effectively grow, their food distribution operations in order to meet the community’s need for healthy and accessible food.

CONTACT PERSON
Tanya Bustamante, Interim Deputy Director, HHCS, 510-981-5178 Attachments:
1: Resolution

RESOLUTION NO. ##,###-N.S.

CONTRACT: BERKELEY FOOD NETWORK FOR BERKELEY-BASED FOOD

ASSISTANCE
WHEREAS, on June 25, 2024, City Council voted to refer to the City Manager to develop and fund a Request for Proposal process to support Berkeley-based food non-profit food assistance providers serving food insecure households; and WHEREAS, the City released an RFP under Specification No. 25-11675-C and convened a panel of stakeholders to review proposals and pricing from Berkeley-based organizations; and
WHEREAS, Berkeley Food Network was selected by the City’s RFP selection process; and
WHEREAS, funding is subject to appropriation in the FY 2025 and FY 2026 budgets in the Aging Services General Fund (Fund 011).

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Berkeley that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute a contract and any amendments, with Berkeley Food Network to provide food assistance to low-income residents and households in Berkeley, in an amount not to exceed $400,000 for the period December 2, 2024 thru June 30, 2026. A record signature copy of said contract and any amendments to be on file in the City Clerk Department.

Office of the City Manager
2180 Milvia Street, Berkeley, CA 94704 ● Tel: (510) 981-7000 ● TDD: (510) 981-6903 ● Fax: (510) 981-7099 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: https://berkeleyca.gov/

CONSENT CALENDAR
October 29, 2024
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Paul Buddenhagen, City Manager
Submitted by: Scott Gilman, Director, Health, Housing, and Community Services Subject: Contract No. 32400176 Amendment: Health Officer Coverage – Dr. Gail Newel

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to amend Contract No. 32400176 with Dr. Gail Newel to increase by $50,000 for a total not to exceed amount (NTE) of $100,000.

FISCAL IMPACTS OF RECOMMENDATION
The City will have a gap in Health Officer coverage when the Health Officer is out of the office and unavailable. Costs for Health Officer coverage will be paid for by General Funds (Fund 011) salary savings in the FY25 Adopted Budget. The grant (fund 302) that supported this contract last year was reduced for all jurisdictions statewide due to budget cuts. Payment will be $50 per hour/$1,200 per day. Total costs are not to exceed $100,000.

CURRENT SITUATION AND ITS EFFECTS
The City of Berkeley receives funding from the California Department of Public Health through the Future of Public Health grant. The funding requires each local health jurisdiction to have Health Officer on-call coverage at all times. This contract enables coverage when the City Health Officer is out of the office.

BACKGROUND
Most public health jurisdictions have on-call Health Officer coverage to address urgent communicable diseases and other public health issues. Additionally, this coverage is required by the Future of Public Health grant. Dr. Newel is an experienced Health Officer who served in Santa Cruz and San Benito counties. The City Council is asked to approve continued Health Officer coverage, as Council also approves the appointment of the permanent Health Officer.

06

Contract Amendment - Contract No. 32400176 for CONSENT CALENDAR Health Officer Coverage Dr. Gail Newel October 29, 2024

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE IMPACTS
There are no environmental sustainability and climate impacts associated directly with the content of this summary report.

RATIONALE FOR RECOMMENDATION
Health Officer coverage is required by the Future of Public Health grant, and may be needed if urgent public health issues arise.

ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS CONSIDERED
The City could continue to have periodic gaps in Health Officer coverage when the Health Officer is unavailable.

CONTACT PERSON
Alexandra Deitch, Sr. HSPS, HHCS, 510-981-5379
Attachments:
1: Resolution

RESOLUTION NO. ##,###-N.S.

CONTRACT No. 32400176 AMENDMENT: DR. GAIL NEWEL FOR HEALTH OFFICER

SERVICES DURING PERIODS WHEN THE CITY HEALTH OFFICER IS OUT OF OFFICE
WHEREAS, most public health jurisdictions have on-call Health Officer coverage to address urgent communicable disease and other public health issues; and WHEREAS, the City of Berkeley receives funding from the California Department of Public Health through the Future of Public Health grant, which requires each local health jurisdiction to have Health Officer coverage at all times; and WHEREAS, Dr. Gail Newel is an experienced Health Officer who has served in Santa Cruz and San Benito counties, and is willing to provide coverage for the City of Berkeley; and
WHEREAS, on May 1, 2024, the City of Berkeley entered into contract with Dr. Newel (Contract 32400176) to provide Health Officer coverage when the Health Officer is out of the office to ensure 24/7 Health Officer coverage; and
WHEREAS, an additional $50,000 to increase the existing contract amount will extend Health Officer coverage for the City of Berkeley when the Health Officer is out of the office and unavailable.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Berkeley that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to amend Contract No. 32400176 and any amendments with Dr. Gail Newel from May 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025 in an amount not to exceed $100,000 utilizing General Funds.

Office of the City Manager
2180 Milvia Street, Berkeley, CA 94704 ● Tel: (510) 981-7000 ● TDD: (510) 981-6903 ● Fax: (510) 981-7099 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: https://berkeleyca.gov/

CONSENT CALENDAR
October 29, 2024
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Paul Buddenhagen, City Manager
Submitted by: Scott Gilman, Director, Health, Housing, and Community Services Subject: Contract No. 32400177 Amendment: Health Officer Coverage – Dr. Lisa B.

Hernandez

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to amending Contract No. 32400177 with Dr. Lisa B. Hernandez to increase by $50,000 for a total not to exceed amount (NTE) of $100,000.

FISCAL IMPACTS OF RECOMMENDATION
The City will have a gap in Health Officer coverage when the Health Officer is out of the office and unavailable. Costs for Health Officer coverage will be paid for by General Funds (Fund 011) salary savings in the FY25 Adopted Budget. The grant (fund 302) that supported this contract last year was reduced for all jurisdictions statewide due to budget cuts. Payment will be $50 per hour/$1,200 per day. Total costs are not to exceed $100,000.

CURRENT SITUATION AND ITS EFFECTS
The City of Berkeley receives funding from the California Department of Public Health through the Future of Public Health grant. The funding requires each local health jurisdiction to have Health Officer on-call coverage at all times. This contract enables coverage when the City Health Officer is out of the office.

BACKGROUND
Most public health jurisdictions have on-call Health Officer coverage to address urgent communicable diseases and other public health issues. Additionally, this coverage is required by the Future of Public Health grant. Dr. Hernandez served as Health Officer for the City of Berkeley for five years, until July 2023. The City Council is asked to approve continued Health Officer coverage, as Council also approves the appointment of the permanent Health Officer.

07

Contract Amendment – Contract No. 34200177 for CONSENT CALENDAR Health Officer Coverage Dr. Lisa Hernandez October 29, 2024

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE IMPACTS
There are no environmental sustainability and climate impacts associated directly with the content of this summary report.

RATIONALE FOR RECOMMENDATION
Health Officer coverage is required by the Future of Public Health grant, and may be needed if urgent public health issues arise.

ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS CONSIDERED
The City could continue to have periodic gaps in Health Officer coverage when the Health Officer is unavailable.

CONTACT PERSON
Alexandra Deitch, Sr. HSPS, HHCS, 510-981-5379
Attachments:
1: Resolution

RESOLUTION NO. ##,###-N.S.

CONTRACT No. 32400177 AMENDMENT: DR. LISA HERNANDEZ FOR HEALTH

OFFICER SERVICES DURING PERIODS WHEN THE CITY HEALTH OFFICER IS

OUT OF OFFICE
WHEREAS, most public health jurisdictions have on-call Health Officer coverage to address urgent communicable disease and other public health issues; and WHEREAS, the City of Berkeley receives funding from the California Department of Public Health through the Future of Public Health grant, which requires each local health jurisdiction to have Health Officer coverage at all times; and WHEREAS, Dr. Lisa Hernandez served as the Health Officer for the City of Berkeley for five years, and is willing to provide coverage for the City of Berkeley again; and WHEREAS, on April 1, 2024 the City of Berkeley entered into contract with Dr. Hernandez (Contract 324001777) to provide Health Officer coverage when the Health Officer is out of the office to ensure 24/7 Health Officer coverage; and WHEREAS, an additional $50,000 to increase the existing contract amount will extend Health Officer coverage for the City of Berkeley when the Health Officer is out of the office and unavailable.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Berkeley that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to amend Contract No. 32400177 and any amendments with Dr. Lisa Hernandez from April 1, 2024 to June 30, 2026 in an amount not to exceed $100,000 utilizing General Funds.

Office of the City Manager
2180 Milvia Street, Berkeley, CA 94704 ● Tel: (510) 981-7000 ● TDD: (510) 981-6903 ● Fax: (510) 981-7099 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: https://berkeleyca.gov/

CONSENT CALENDAR
October 29, 2024
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Paul Buddenhagen, City Manager
Submitted by: Scott Gilman, Director, Health, Housing, and Community Services Subject: Housing Trust Fund Recommendations for the Berkeley Unified School District Workforce Housing Project and the St. Paul Terrace Project

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution to:

1. Reserve an additional $2,000,000 for Satellite Affordable Housing Associates (SAHA) and Abode Communities’ Berkeley Unified School District (BUSD) Workforce Housing project; and

2. Reserve an additional $3,504,319 for Community Housing Development Corporation of North Richmond (CHDC)’s St. Paul Terrace project with the following conditions:
a. Funds shall be reserved for a period of no more than 18 months from the date of Council approval, contingent on the development team obtaining all required land use approvals of the property and securing commitments for project funding that the City Manager or their designee deems sufficient within the reservation period.
b. CHDC shall apply to alternative funding sources with the intent of reducing the need for these additional City funds. CHDC shall provide updates to the City on the applications submitted and the outcomes.

3. Authorize the City Manager or their designee to execute all original or amended documents or agreements to effectuate these actions.

SUMMARY
The City of Berkeley recently received funding requests for two affordable housing projects with existing development funding reservations from the City. SAHA and Abode Communities submitted a request for $2M for the BUSD Workforce Housing project at 1701 San Pablo Avenue, and CHDC submitted a request of $3,504,319 for St. Paul Terrace at 2024 Ashby Avenue. The funding recommendations are based on the available funds in the Housing Trust Fund and the City’s goal of supporting pipeline projects and increasing the number of affordable housing units in Berkeley.

08

HTF Recommendations for the Berkeley Unified School District CONSENT CALENDAR Workforce Housing Project and the St. Paul Terrace Project October 29, 2024

FISCAL IMPACTS OF RECOMMENDATION
The attached resolution would reserve an additional $2 million for the BUSD Workforce Housing project and an additional $3,504,319 for the St. Paul Terrace project. Currently, there are sufficient funds in the Housing Trust Fund (HTF) program to fund the requests. Staff will determine the exact mix of funds from the HTF closer to the loan closing. This mix could include the following funds: Measure O bond funds (Fund #512), Affordable Housing Mitigation Fee (Fund #120), Inclusionary Housing Fee (Fund #122), Condo Conversion Fee (Fund #123), and Commercial Housing Mitigation Fee (Fund #331). Funding is subject to appropriations in Annual Appropriations Ordinance 1.

CURRENT SITUATION AND ITS EFFECTS
On September 5, 2024 the Housing Advisory Commission voted as follows to approve the staff recommendations as written above.

M/S/C: Mendonca/ Ortiz-Cedeño. Ayes: Bell, Braslaw, Mendonca, Ortiz-Cedeño, and Potter. Noes: None. Abstain: None. Absent: Calavita (unexcused), Haycox (excused), Shere (excused), and Simon-Weisberg (excused).

The funding recommendations are based on the City’s goal of supporting pipeline projects and increasing the number of affordable housing units in Berkeley.

The City of Berkeley recently received funding requests for two affordable housing projects with existing development funding reservations from the City. SAHA and Abode Communities submitted a request for $2M for the BUSD Workforce Housing project at 1701 San Pablo Avenue, and CHDC submitted a request of $3,504,319 for St. Paul Terrace at 2024 Ashby Avenue.

The HTF Guidelines allow developers to apply for City funding outside of a competitive process if their projects meet the definition of being at risk. Projects can qualify if they have documented state or federal funding commitments that they are at risk of losing, and if the developers can demonstrate the following:
 The urgency of the need;
 The steps they have taken to avoid the need for additional City funds; and  That no other funds are available to meet the need.

BACKGROUND
BUSD Workforce Housing Project
Located at 1701 San Pablo Avenue, BUSD Workforce Housing is a mixed-income housing project being developed by SAHA and Abode Communities (Abode). SAHA and Abode will develop a 110-unit project with a leasing preference for BUSD employees and their households. City Council previously approved $24.5M funding reservation for SAHA and Abode to develop the project.

HTF Recommendations for the Berkeley Unified School District CONSENT CALENDAR Workforce Housing Project and the St. Paul Terrace Project October 29, 2024

SAHA and Abode applied for and received an award from the California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) which required them to receive a tax credit and bond allocation in 2024. They were successful in meeting that requirement and received a tax credit/bond allocation on August 6, 2024. With the CalHFA and bond awards, the project must close the construction financing by February 2, 2025 or it will lose the funding and have to restart the process of securing financing (which may take several years). SAHA applied for but did not receive California Infill Infrastructure Grant funds that would have fully funded the project. The development team reduced the scope of work by $3M, yet a $2M funding gap remains.

The project qualifies as at-risk and is eligible to apply for City funding outside of a competitive process. The CalHFA funding will be revoked if the project does not close its construction financing in the next six months, which represents an urgent need.

SAHA and Abode were unsuccessful in filling the financing gap with the Infill Infrastructure Grant, and no other funding sources are feasible within the CalHFA timeline. If awarded the additional funds, the total City subsidy in the project would be $26.5 million, equal to 34.6% of the total development cost.

St. Paul Terrace Project
Located at 2024 Ashby Avenue, St. Paul Terrace is a 50-unit affordable housing project being developed by CHDC. To date, Council has approved a total of $12,250,000 in City predevelopment and development funding for the project.

CHDC requested an additional $3,504,319 to support the development of St. Paul Terrace to cover increased insurance, construction, and interest costs. Since CHDC submitted their first application to the City in 2021, the cost of construction increased significantly due to the number of stories needed to get up to 50 units at this site, i.e., five stories of wood framing above three stories of concrete. The increase in construction costs has made the project ineligible for the less competitive 4% tax credit/bonds, therefore CHDC is pursuing 9% tax credits. In addition to being more competitive, 9% tax credits are capped, which caused the project to have a gap and need additional soft funding.

The project qualifies as at-risk and is eligible to apply for City funding outside of a competitive process. The project was awarded $16.6M of the State’s Multifamily Housing Program funds, for which construction will need to begin in 2026. It is unlikely that the project would be awarded 9% tax credits in the current round. However, if the project is successful CHDC would need to close construction financing within 180 days of the tax credit award or risk losing the award and delay the project due to the funding gap. If CHDC needs to re-apply for tax credits in subsequent rounds, City requests that CHDC seek other sources that could potentially reduce the need for the additional City funding. The 18-month reservation period would allow CHDC to participate in two more tax credit application rounds. If awarded the additional funds, the total City subsidy for St. Paul Terrace would be $15.7 million, equal to 22.7% of the total development cost.

HTF Recommendations for the Berkeley Unified School District CONSENT CALENDAR Workforce Housing Project and the St. Paul Terrace Project October 29, 2024

Housing Trust Fund
The Housing Trust Fund has a current unallocated balance of approximately $6.2M. A third issuance of Measure O is anticipated in 2025. While most of those funds are already allocated to projects (including the North Berkeley and Ashby BART sites), the unallocated funds from the third Measure O issuance would increase the available HTF balance by approximately $7.4M. If approved, some or all of the additional funding for the BUSD Workforce Housing and St. Paul Terrace projects is likely to come from the next issuance of the Measure O bond. The source of the additional funding for each project would be established shortly before the project’s loan closing, based on then- current fund balances, and any restrictions the funds may carry. Depending on the project schedules and timing of the bond issuance, the funds may not be available at construction start. The HTF Guidelines allow a City subsidy of up to 40% of a project’s total development cost.

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE IMPACTS
There are no identifiable sustainability and climate impacts directly associated with the recommendations of this report. The BUSD project meets the City’s goals of sustainability. The sustainability features include all-electric building consistent with the City's recently adopted standards, maximize the potential for on-site renewable energy, providing capacity for electric vehicle charging, creating bicycle storage, and achieving either LEED Gold or GreenPoint Gold certification. The St. Paul Terrace project will have climate-sensitive design and CHDC will incorporate the City's Climate Action Plan using the Green Point Rating system to as required by the City to address sustainability.

RATIONALE FOR RECOMMENDATION
Both projects are considered at-risk under the HTF Guidelines (V.D.1), and approving additional funds would support the City’s goal of creating affordable housing. Without this City funding, SAHA and CHDC risk losing state funding awards and delaying construction start.

ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS CONSIDERED
If Council does not approve the additional funding requests, the projects would be at risk of losing their state funding awards, and would be delayed. SAHA and CHDC would need to pursue alternative funding sources, and project costs would likely increase.

CONTACT PERSON
Asavari Devadiga, Community Development Project Coordinator, HHCS, 510-981-5426 Attachment:
1: Resolution

RESOLUTION NO. ##,###-N.S.

APPROVAL OF THE FUNDING RESERVATION FOR
WHEREAS, City Council established a Housing Trust Fund (HTF) program to assist in the development and expansion of housing affordable to low- and moderate-income persons who either work or reside within the City of Berkeley, and authorized the City Manager to implement the HTF program; and
WHEREAS, there is a great need for affordable and special needs housing in the City of Berkeley as stated in the General Plan Housing Element and the City of Berkeley’s Consolidated Plan; and
WHEREAS, City Council adopted guidelines (HTF Guidelines) as revised on January 19, 2021, and authorized the City Manager to implement the HTF program in accordance with the Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the City’s HTF Guidelines allow funding requests to be submitted at any time for projects at imminent risk, including projects the City previously funded that are at risk of losing state or federal funding awards; and
WHEREAS, on December 14, 2021, by Resolution 70,134-N.S., the City Council approved $24.5 million funding reservation for Satellite Affordable Housing Associates (SAHA) and Abode Communities’ (Abode) Berkeley Unified School District (BUSD) Workforce Housing project; and
WHEREAS, on April 20, 2021, by Resolution 69,795-N.S., the City Council approved $1,198,960 for Community Housing Development Corporation’s (CHDC) St. Paul Terrace project;
WHEREAS, on December 14, 2021, by Resolution 70,135-N.S., the City Council approved additional $2,500,000 for CHDC’s St. Paul Terrace project; WHEREAS, on June 14, 2022, by Resolution 70,407-N.S., the City Council approved additional $8,551,040 for CHDC’s St. Paul Terrace project; WHEREAS, the BUSD Workforce Housing project and St. Paul Terrace project meet the definition of at-risk, as both secured state funding awards that may be rescinded if the projects don’t secure their remaining financing and start construction within the state- designated timeframe; and
WHEREAS, SAHA and Abode submitted a request for additional funding of $2,000,000 for the BUSD Workforce Housing project, and CHDC submitted a request for additional funding for $3,504,319 for St. Paul Terrace project; and

WHEREAS, on September 5, 2024, the Housing Advisory Commission (HAC) approved a motion recommending that Council approve SAHA and Abodes additional funding request of $2,000,000 for BUSD Workforce Housing Project and CHDC’s additional funding request of $3,504,319 for St. Paul Terrace Project; and WHEREAS, HAC’s motion included a recommendation that the funds for CHDC’s St. Paul Terrace project be reserved for a period of no more than 18 months from the date of Council approval, contingent on the development team obtaining all required land use approvals of the property and securing commitments for project funding that the City Manager or designee deems sufficient within the reservation period; and that CHDC shall apply to alternative funding sources with the intent of reducing the need for these additional City funds. CHDC shall provide updates to the City on the applications submitted and the outcomes; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Berkeley that the Council approves the following funding reservations:
 $2,000,000 for Satellite Affordable Housing Associates and Abode Communities’ BUSD Workforce Housing project (1701 San Pablo Avenue); for a total City reservation of $26,500,000; and
 $3,504,319 for Community Housing Development Corporation’s St. Paul Terrace project (2024 Ashby Avenue), for a total City reservation of $15,754,319.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the funds for the BUSD Workforce Housing project shall be reserved for a period of no more than 24 months from the date of this Resolution, contingent on SAHA and Abode obtaining all required City approvals and securing commitments for full project funding that the City Manager or designee deems sufficient within the reservation period.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the funds for the St. Paul Terrace project shall be reserved for a period of no more than 18 months from the date of this Resolution, contingent on CHDC obtaining all required City approvals and securing commitments for full project funding that the City Manager or designee deems sufficient within the reservation period.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that CDHC shall apply to alternative funding sources with the intent of reducing the need for these additional City funds, and shall provide updates to the City on the applications submitted and the outcomes.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the funding reservation is conditioned upon the completion of the environmental review process, as applicable, except as authorized by 24 CFR, Part 58, and that should HOME and/or CDBG funds constitute a portion of the funding for any project, a final commitment of HOME and/or CDBG funds shall occur only upon the satisfactory completion of the appropriate level of environmental review and also upon the receipt of approval of the request for release of funds and related certification from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, when applicable. The funding reservation for any of the HOME- and/or CDBG-funded projects is conditioned

upon the City of Berkeley's determination to proceed with, modify, or cancel the project based on the results of subsequent environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the making of each loan shall be contingent on and subject to such other appropriate terms and conditions as the City Manager or their designee may establish.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the City Manager, or their designee, is hereby authorized to execute all original or amended documents or agreements to effectuate this action; a signed copy of said documents, agreements and any amendments will be kept on file in the Office of City Clerk.

Office of the City Manager
2180 Milvia Street, Berkeley, CA 94704 ● Tel: (510) 981-7000 ● TDD: (510) 981-6903 ● Fax: (510) 981-7099 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: https://berkeleyca.gov/

CONSENT CALENDAR
October 29, 2024
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Paul Buddenhagen, City Manager
Submitted by: Scott Gilman, Director, Health, Housing, and Community Services Subject: Fiscal Year 2025 Meals on Wheels of Alameda County Donations for the Berkeley Meals on Wheels Program

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution accepting donations for the Berkeley Meals on Wheels Program from the Meals on Wheels of Alameda County (MOWAC) agency, for Fiscal Year 2025 (FY2025).

FISCAL IMPACTS OF RECOMMENDATION
The donations will be received and deposited on a quarterly basis into the Fund-Raising Activities Fund (ERMA GL Code 111-51-505-549-2044-000-444-612990-) and will be appropriated as part of the First Amendment to the FY 2025 Annual Appropriations Ordinance for supporting the operations of the Meals on Wheels. These donations will support the cost of hourly personnel and operating expenses needed to provide meals to home-bound seniors by the City of Berkeley Meals on Wheels program.

CURRENT SITUATION AND ITS EFFECTS
The Berkeley Meals on Wheels program contributes to the City’s Strategic Plan goal to be a customer-focused organization that provides excellent, timely, easily-accessible service to the community; particularly the older adult, homebound community. The Berkeley Meals on Wheels program provides over 60,000 nutritious meals to over 250 seniors each year.

MOWAC is a private, non-profit agency that raises funds for the six Meals on Wheels programs in Alameda County. MOWAC provides special grant funding and donations to programs to support the delivery of meals to home-bound seniors.

BACKGROUND
The City of Berkeley Meals on Wheels program is funded by an annual grant contract with the Alameda County Area Agency on Aging, as well as by client and community donations and the City’s General Fund. While each Meals on Wheels program in the County is expected to support unfunded costs of the program to meet community

09

Fiscal Year 2025 Meals on Wheels of Alameda County Donations CONSENT CALENDAR for the Berkeley Meals on Wheels Program October 29, 2024

needs, MOWAC helps programs meet additional needs by conducting its own fundraising efforts for the benefit of all programs countywide.

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE IMPACTS
The Berkeley Meals on Wheels program packages its meals in compostable containers to reduce landfill waste. The program also offers volunteer bicycle delivery routes.

RATIONALE FOR RECOMMENDATION
Donations received from MOWAC will provide the Berkeley Meals on Wheels program with significant financial support that can be directly applied to both personnel and operating expenses for the program.

ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS CONSIDERED
Refusing donations from MOWAC would not be consistent with the City’s Strategic Plan goals or its efforts to sustain an Age-Friendly Berkeley, and is not recommended.

CONTACT PERSON
Ngoc Oanh Guise, Interim Aging Services Manager, HHCS, (510) 981-5113 Attachments:
1: Resolution

RESOLUTION NO. ##,###-N.S.

FISCAL YEAR 2025 MEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY DONATIONS FOR

THE BERKELEY MEALS ON WHEELS PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Meals on Wheels of Alameda County (MOWAC) Agency’s mission is to raise funds for the six Meals on Wheels programs in Alameda County, including Berkeley Meals on Wheels; and
WHEREAS, Alameda County distributes these funds on a quarterly and proportional basis to Meals on Wheels programs and special grant requests throughout Alameda County; and
WHEREAS, Berkeley Meals on Wheels provides over 60,000 nutritious meals to over 250 seniors each year; and
WHEREAS, MOWAC donations will assist in covering personnel costs or providing meals to homebound seniors; and
WHEREAS, the donations will be deposited into the Fund-Raising Activities Fund (ERMA Budget Code 111-51-505-549-2044-000-444-612990-) and will be appropriated as part of the First Amendment to the FY 2025 Annual Appropriations Ordinance.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Berkeley that donations to the Berkeley Meals on Wheels program from the Meals on Wheels of Alameda County Agency are accepted to support personnel and operational costs of meal provision to home-bound seniors by the City of Berkeley Meals on Wheels program.

Office of the City Manager

CONSENT CALENDAR
October 29, 2024
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Paul Buddenhagen, City Manager
Submitted by: Kevin C. Fong, Director of Information Technology Subject: Contract No. 32400104 Amendment: SmartWave for City Facility Managed Wi-Fi

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to amend Contract No. 32400104 with SmartWave Technologies LLC, for managed Wi-Fi and related services increasing the amount by $250,000 for a total not-to-exceed amount of $620,000 from July 25, 2023 to June 30, 2026.

FISCAL IMPACTS OF RECOMMENDATION
Funding for the additional services in the amount of $250,000 will be available in the Department of Information Technology’s (IT) Cost Allocation fund, #680. Planned spending in the future fiscal years (FY) are subject to Council approval of the proposed city-wide budget and Annual Appropriation Ordinances.

CURRENT SITUATION AND ITS EFFECTS
The City continues to adopt a more mobile workforce, and the platforms we provide and support are increasingly reliant on wireless technology. IT contracts SmartWave Technologies LLC as the City’s service provider and implementer. To meet increasing demand, we have identified the need for additional wireless access points (APs) to improve coverage in existing buildings and new sites due to various city department expansions. Exercising the contract extension options for another year ensures our ability to meet the expansion needs as well as maintain existing performance and modernization goals.

SmartWave has proven itself in deploying and managing over 200 access points (APs) in City of Berkeley buildings resulting in improved coverage and IT is very satisfied with the deployment, service and support SmartWave provides, and desires to continue using them.

An enterprise-quality Wi-Fi infrastructure aligns with the City’s Strategic Plan Priority to provide state-of-the-art, well-maintained infrastructure, amenities, and facilities.

10

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE IMPACTS
Overall cost-effectiveness of Wi-Fi is greater than hard-wired ethernet, as there is no need to fully wire a facility with ethernet cable (comprised of copper and other materials), so the deployment cost of Wi-Fi is significantly less than a hardwired office and inherently faster to deploy.

Because Wi-Fi is “radio” based, it has a broader reach within a facility than a hardwired option. Reconfiguration of office space will require less material and labor with Wi-Fi than a hardwired solution, thus reducing the carbon footprint and cost of ownership over a lifespan.

Finally, as the City deploys more advanced technologies, and with the increasing demand from the community, this project will assist in providing community access to Wi-Fi at all City locations. By providing remote access to data, operational efficiencies are increased for staff, and energy and global warming emissions are reduced by both staff and the community.

RATIONALE FOR RECOMMENDATION
Deploying and managing a city-wide Wi-Fi solution requires dedicated staff time, both for monitoring the “uptime” of the system as well as replacing failed hardware. With already over 200+ access points, IT does not have adequate staff to provide for a 99% uptime, let alone, an ability to deploy Wi-Fi throughout all city-wide facilities.

Engaging a vendor to provide a managed service is the logical solution. A vendor will be responsible for the initial deployment of hardware with IT supervision and leadership, management and upkeep of the network, and “truck runs” (service calls) for repair. This will make Wi-Fi throughout City facilities as ubiquitous as a telephone and will be an expected service that is available and “just works”.

The City of Berkeley has been, and continues to use a competitively bid, cooperative contract from the City of Tucson, AZ. The City of Tucson, AZ conducted a competitive Request for Proposal (RFP) process that solicited bids for a vendor to provide “Region- Wide Point to Point Wireless System for the Regional Transportation Data Network” and selected SmartWave Technologies LLC (Attachment 1, Contract 240021-01), which was awarded and accepted on May 10, 2024 with one-year options to extend on an annual basis.

SmartWave Technologies LLC has extensive experience providing Wi-Fi installation and maintenance services and has a demonstrated, proven track record of completing projects on time and on budget, in addition to having responsive customer service. They are currently contracted by many local municipalities, including Oakland, San Jose, Dublin and Pleasanton. Furthermore, the County of San Mateo, Daly City, San Leandro, Hayward, South San Francisco and Livermore are currently using this competitive bid contract from the City of Tucson, AZ.

ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS CONSIDERED
Staff considered completing these installation services internally, but due to the high volume of existing work, staff do not currently have the capacity or the expertise to perform such a high volume of Wi-Fi installations and ongoing maintenance at all City locations.

CONTACT PERSON
Kevin C. Fong, Director of Information Technology, (510) 981-6541 Attachments:
1: Resolution
2: Tucson Contract Signed 05/10/2024

Internal
RESOLUTION NO. ##,###-N.S.

COMPETITIVE BID CONTRACT – SMARTWAVE FOR CITY FACILITY MANAGED WI-FI WHEREAS, the City continues to adopt a more mobile workforce, and the platforms the City Information Technology Department (IT) provides and supports are increasingly reliant on wireless technology, and
WHEREAS, IT contracts SmartWave Technologies LLC as the City’s Wi-Fi service provider and implementer, and
WHEREAS, to meet increasing demand, IT has identified the need for additional wireless access points (APs) to improve coverage in existing buildings and new sites due to various city department expansions, and
WHEREAS, exercising the contract extension options for another year ensures our ability to meet the expansion needs as well as maintain existing performance and modernization goals, and
WHEREAS, having an enterprise quality Wi-Fi infrastructure is consistent with the City’s Strategic Plan Priority to provide state-of-the-art, well-maintained infrastructure, amenities, and facilities, and
WHEREAS, The City of Tucson conducted a competitive Request for Proposal (RFP) process that solicited bids for a vendor to provide “Region-Wide Point to Point Wireless System for the Regional Transportation Data Network” and selected SmartWave Technologies LLC, which was awarded and accepted on May 10, 2024 with one-year options to extend on an annual basis, and
WHEREAS, IT has been, and continues to use a competitively bid, cooperative contract from the City of Tucson, AZ for the same services, and
WHEREAS, the projected cost for Fiscal Years 2025-2026 is an additional $250,000 in total, which will be available in the Department of Technology’s Cost Allocation fund (Fund #680) and planned spending in future years (FY) are subject to Council approval of the proposed city-wide budget and Annual Appropriation Ordinances, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Berkeley that the City Manager is authorized to amend contract #32400104 with Smartwave Technologies LLC, for managed Wi-Fi, including cabling, increasing the amount by $250,000 for a total not-to-exceed amount of $620,000 from July 25, 2023 to June 30, 2026.

Internal

Restricted
Contract No. 240021-01
JOC for Design, Installation and Maintenance of Point-to- Point/ Point-to-Mult ipoint Wireless Backhaul
Table of Contents

1. Offer and Acceptance

2. SmartW AVE’s Signed Letter of Concurrence

3. SmartW AVE’s response to Intent to Negotiate

4. City’s request for Intent to Negotiate

5. SmartW AVE’s response to RFQ

6. Pricing

7. Insurance

8. RFQ# 240021

Restricted

1. Offer and Acceptance

Restricted

OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE
OFFER
TO THE CITY OF TUCSON:

The Undersigned hereby offers and shall furnish the material or service in compliance with all terms, scope of work, conditions, specifications, and addendums in the Request for Qualifications which is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.

For clarification of this offer, contact:

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Al Brown
Name:

Company Name
2662 Holcomb Bridge Rd, Suite 340 CEO
Title:
404-731-9580
Phone:

Fax:

Signature of Person Authorized to Sign
E-mail: [email protected]
Printed Name: Al Brown
CEO
Title

ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER
The Offer is hereby accepted. The Contractor is now bound to sell the materials or services specified in the Contract. This Contract shall be referred to as Contract No. .

CITY OF TUCSON, a municipal corporation
Approved as to form: Awarded:

This 13th day of May 20 24 This 10th day of May 20 24 for
As Director of Business Services and not
personally
for
As Tucson City Attorney and not personally
Address
R
oswell G
A 3
0022
City State Zip

Restricted

2. Smart W AVE’s Signed Let ter of
Concurrence

Restricted
Casey Adams
Principal Contract Officer
(520) 837-4128
[email protected]
April 2, 2023, sent via email this day to: [email protected] Al Brown
CEO
SmartWAVE Technologies, LLC.
2662 Holcomb Bridge Rd. Suite 340
Roswell, GA 30022
Subject: RFQ No. 240021 - JOC for Design, Installation and Maintenance of Point-to-Point/Point-to- Multipoint Wireless Backhaul
Dear Al,
This letter serves as a request for concurrence that the attached documentation is agreed upon for the subject solicitation. Specifically, you are asked to provide written confirmation by signing the concurrence line below. Points of agreement not identified below are not included in the offer. In the event there is any disagreement with this document or if there is other information that must be included in this document, Smartwave must specify such in a written response to this request.

The following agreement has been made between the City of Tucson and SmartWAVE regarding Request for Qualifications No. 240021 and is reflected in the following documents:

1. City of Tucson’s Intent to Negotiate Letter dated February 14, 2024 (1 page).

2. The Contract consists of the following documents which are listed in order of precedence:
a. Exhibit A - Pricing for 240021 (4 pages)
b. Original response to RFQ 240021 submitted by SmartWAVE Technologies, LLC.

Please submit a written response providing your firm’s concurrence at your earliest convenience via email to me at [email protected]. If you should have any questions, please call me at (520) 837-4128.

CITY OF TUCSON: SmartWAVE Technologies, LLC:

Authorized Signature Date Authorized Signature Date
Al Brown - CEO
Printed Name Printed Name
c File 240021
4/02/2024

Restricted
255 W. Alameda, 6th Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701 | Business Services Department – Procurement www.tucsonprocurement.com

Restricted

3. Smart W AVE’s response to Intent
to Negotiate

Restricted

4. City’s request for Intent to
Negot iate

Restricted
Casey Adams
Senior Contract Officer
(520) 837-4128
[email protected]
February 14, 2024 Sent this day via email: [email protected] Al Brown
CEO
SmartWAVE Technologies, LLC
2662 Holcomb Bridge Rd., Suite 340
Roswell, GA 30022
RE: Intent to Negotiate RFQ #240021
JOC for Design, Installation and Maintenance of Point-to-Point/Point-to-Multipoint Wireless Backhaul
Congratulations! The City of Tucson has completed the scoring for the above referenced solicitation and is pleased to invite your firm to enter into contract negotiations. All terms and conditions in the solicitation will become the terms and conditions of the contract.

Please provide your pricing pertaining to this RFQ. This pricing will be used under this contract.

In addition to a complete pricing breakdown, the City is requesting:
 One price for both licensed and unlicensed link support. o The City has our own frequency protection service that handles PCN responses for our FCC licenses.
 Pricing for 24/7 support for critical links.
 Fixed equipment and labor prices.

The Notice of Intent to Negotiate is not an intent to award a contract and does not establish a contractual relationship with the City. In the event that the City is not able to negotiate a satisfactory contract with your firm, the City will terminate negotiations.

Please submit pricing via email to [email protected] by February 21, 2023.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Sincerely,
Casey Adams
Senior Contract Officer

Restricted
255 W. Alameda, 6th Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701 | Business Services Department – Procurement www.tucsonprocurement.com

Restricted

5. Smart W AVE’s response to RFQ

Restricted

JOC FOR DESIGN, INSTALLATION AND

MAINTENANCE OF POINT-TO-POINT/POINT-TO-

MULTIPOINT WIRELESS BACKHAUL
Bid Number: 240021

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
SmartWAVE Technologies LLC
2662 Holcomb Bridge Rd, Suite 340
Alpharetta, GA 30022
November 14, 2023

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 2
Restricted
Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data (None)
By accepting this document, Client agrees to use such materials and information solely for the purpose of evaluation. No information within this response is marked confidential or proprietary per the Bid document, but we do request notification in the event our response is requested by personnel or companies that are not employed by the City or part of the evaluation process.

Contact Information:

Al Brown - CEO
SmartWave Technologies LLC
2662 Holcomb Bridge Rd, Suite 340
Alpharetta, GA 30022
404-731-9580
[email protected]
Catch the WAVE!
SmartWave Technologies
recognized by magazine as

SMART CITY
SOLUTION PROVIDERS - 2018
An annual listing of 20 companies that are at the forefront of providing Smart City solutions and impacting the marketplace

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 3
Restricted
Table of Contents
A – QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE OF THE FIRM...................................................................................................4 A.1 - PRIOR EXPERIENCE.........................................................................................................................................................................................4 A.2 - REFERENCES FOR SIMILAR PROJECTS............................................................................................................................................................5 B – EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS OF THE TEAM..................................................................................................7 B.1 - RESOURCE OVERVIEW...................................................................................................................................................................................7 B.2 - PROJECT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART............................................................................................................................................................10 B.3 – CERTIFICATIONS..........................................................................................................................................................................................10 C – METHOD OF APPROACH AND AVAILABLE RESOURCES TO COMPLETE WORK......................................................13 C.1 - SMARTWAVE METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................................................................................13 C.2 - EXPEDITED PROCESS....................................................................................................................................................................................16 C.3 - STATEMENT OF WORK................................................................................................................................................................................16 C.4 – QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL ...............................................................................................................................................18 C.5 – BONDING....................................................................................................................................................................................................19 C.6 – TRAINING AND SAFETY...............................................................................................................................................................................19 C.7 – TOOLS (HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE) ........................................................................................................................20 D – SUBCONTRACTOR SELECTION PLAN.......................................................................................................................21 E – PRODUCTS PROPOSED............................................................................................................................................23 F – PRICING....................................................................................................................................................................24 F.1 – MENU OF PRICING......................................................................................................................................................................................24 F.2 – COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT........................................................................................................................................................................25

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 4
Restricted
A – QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE OF THE FIRM
A.1 - Prior Experience
SmartWAVE has been providing similar services to Municipal Governments since our founding in 2007. A sample of Smart Cities where we have provided similar wireless network design, installation and managed services:
 Tucson AZ
 Pima County AZ
 Golder Ranch Fire Dept AZ
 Northwest Fire Dept AZ
 Avra Valley Fire Dept AZ
 Three Points Fire Dept AZ
 Marana AZ
 Oro Valley AZ
 Mesa AZ
 Casa Grande AZ
 Phoenix AZ
 Santa Monica CA
 San Jose CA
 San Leandro CA
 San Mateo County CA
 Mountain View CA
 Los Angeles CA
 Omaha NE
 Lincoln NE
 Council Bluffs IA
 Atlanta GA
 McDonough GA
 Roswell GA

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 5
Restricted
A.2 - References for Similar Projects
The following references include Community WiFi Networks using Ruckus Mesh WiFi products for public WiFi access similar to those requested for this initiative.

Reference #1: Wireless Network Services
Owner: City of Tucson
Contact Name: Francisco Leyva, Traffic Engineering, City of Tucson Contact Phone #: 520-837-6672 E-mail: [email protected] Project Overview: Planning, design, installation and post installation support for the City’s wireless infrastructure supporting the Intelligent Traffic Control Network. These services have been provided since 2007 and include a variety of wireless technologies to include Mesh WiFi, WiMAX, Licensed and Unlicensed Microwave PTP Links and Wireless PTMP Technologies. These technologies have also been deployed to support other city services to include Police, Fire and Information Technology departments. All projects have been completed on time and within budget.

Reference #2: Wireless Network Services
Owner: City of San Jose
Contact Name: Ed Kim, Deputy CIO, City of San Jose
Contact Phone #:
408-793-6873 E-mail: [email protected]
Project Overview: Planning, design, installation and post installation support for all of the City’s wireless infrastructure, including Community Wireless Broadband Networks, the San Jose Airport and the Convention Center. Wireless infrastructure includes all City owned facilities to include 60 Community Centers, City Hall, Public Works, Waste Water Treatment Plant, Police facilities, Fire facilities and all other city buildings. Wireless
technologies include Siklu mmWave, Cambium mmWave,
Ruckus WiFi, Mimosa Point to Multipoint, and Mimosa and SIAE Licensed and Unlicensed Microwave. The networks serve

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 6
Restricted
over 500,000+ unique clients per month. All projects have been completed on time and within budget.

Reference #3: Wireless Network Services
Owner: County of San Mateo
Contact Phone #: 510-813-8303 E-mail: [email protected] Contact Name: Benny Lee, Project Manager, County of San Mateo Project Overview: Planning, design, installation and post installation support for the County’s Community WiFi Initiative. SmartWAVE has
provided these services since 2014, implementing a number of rural communities in the County, Community Centers, Parks and other public locations. Wireless projects have included indoor and outdoor WiFi solutions, Point to Point solutions and Point to Multipoint solutions. All projects have been
completed on time and within budget. SmartWAVE uses
subcontractors Layer 1 Networks for low voltage cabling work and Rosendin Electric for electrical remediation work as needed to support the projects.

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 7
Restricted
B – EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS OF THE TEAM
B.1 - Resource Overview
SmartWAVE is assigning personnel offering unmatched experience and skills for designing, deploying and supporting wireless networks at key positions in Executive Management, Project Management, RF Engineering and Network Engineering. The resources assigned are a proven team in deploying award winning networks to include a number of municipal deployments similar to this one. No other firm responding can claim the success that SmartWAVE has demonstrated.

Project Team Resume
Project Executive - Al Brown
Al is President and CEO of SmartWAVE. In this role, he leads the company's growth, business strategy and position as an emerging market leader in providing innovative wireless networks and solutions. His responsibilities include P&L reviews, development of cost models, business plans and term sheets, identification of skill sets, and recruitment and management of team members. He is also responsible for leading negotiations for credit lines and facilities with distributors, manufacturers and financial institutions to support growth of SmartWAVE and their markets.

Al has been published in trade magazines regarding the deployment of wireless networking architectures. Mr. Brown has also given a number of presentations on wireless technologies and deployments and is often asked to participate in wireless workshops with local government entities.

Al’s experience in providing Community Network Access solutions include the Council Bluffs BLINK Community Network, the Eastside Union High School District Community Network with the City of San Jose, the Wickedly Fast WiFi in San Jose, along with hundreds of other public access network deployment for cities in the Bay Area and across the United States to include for the City of Mountain View, San Mateo County, City of Los Angeles, City of Tucson, Santa Monica and a host of other cities.

Al has been with SmartWAVE since March of 2007 and engaged in the wireless industry since 1997. Previous corporate experience includes SmartWAVE, EDS and IBM Global Services. He received a Bachelor of Science in Mathematical Sciences from Clemson University. Mr. Brown was also a graduate of the EDS Systems Engineering Development program and the Executive Consulting Institute at IBM Global Services.

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 8
Restricted
Project Manager – Josh Kehl
Josh is the Arizona Operations Manager for SmartWAVE Technologies where he provides the coordination, tasks management, and communications in the design and deployment of modern wireless networks and applications. Josh is a “working” Manager where he participates in deployment tasks to include Tower climbs, in addition to field engineering and project management services. Josh has been serving the Tucson and Arizona markets for over 20 years in various capacities and with various organizations. Josh is well-versed on a variety of Project Techniques and tools. His methodical approach to project deployments provides for project controls meeting or exceeding customer expectations, with a focus on financial and quality controls. His communication skills are spectacular and provide for granular communication for tasks planned, tasks completed, items for management attention, and items for management action. His commitment to success of the team will ensure this project is destined for success.

Josh has been a part of the SmartWAVE team since 2021 where he has been supporting the City of Tucson on all SmartWAVE contractual obligations. Josh is familiar with and certified on a variety of wireless network products to include Ruckus, Tarana, Siklu, Cisco, Ceragon, SIAE, Mimosa and others. Since his employment with SmartWAVE, he has lead the efforts to deploy numerous PTP and PTMP networks for the City and surrounding agencies to include Oro Valley, Pima County, Golder Ranch Fire Department, Casa Grande, Sedona and Mesa.

Project Engineer - Walter Orell
Walter is a Senior Network Engineer involved in many of the higher profile wireless opportunities that SmartWAVE is involved in. Walter has been working with the City of Tucson since 2005 on various wireless initiatives and is extremely familiar with the City’s network infrastructure and resources. Recent projects experiences (over the past 12 months) include network engineering and design work for the Council Bluffs BLINK Community Network, the ESUHSD James Lick and ESUHSD Overfelt Community Networks with the City of San Jose, County of San Mateo public WiFi initiatives, and the Austin Police Department Wireless Video offload project, along with network engineering and design work for the City of Mountain View, City of San Leandro, City of Richmond (CA), City of Los Angeles, City of Tucson, City of Santa Monica and a host of other cities. Past experience includes being the Project Engineer for the BLINK Community Network in Council Bluffs and ESUHSD Community Network in San Jose, Lead Network Engineer for the Pima County Video Network, Lead Network Engineer

for the Google Mesh Network in Mountain View, and support for a variety of other

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 9
Restricted
Mesh, Point to Multipoint, and Point to Point wireless networks that SmartWAVE has deployed. He has worked with and supported a variety of municipal applications within these projects to include Transportation, Police, Fire and Information Services.

Walter is Ruckus WISE Certified, and also certified on a variety of wireless technologies including Tarana, Siklu, Ruckus, Mimosa, Ubiquiti, Cambium, Tropos, Cisco and Meraki.

Walter holds a Cisco CCNA certification and has experience configuring, auditing Cisco WiSM and WCS Controllers, along with Routers, switches and other peripheral devices. He is also trained on a variety of Video Surveillance platforms.

Senior RF Engineer – Nikolay Yumatov
Nikolay is a Senior RF Engineer involved in many of the higher profile wireless opportunities that SmartWAVE is involved in. Recent projects experiences (over the past 12 months) include propagation modeling and design work for ESUHSD James Lick and ESUHSD Overfelt Community WiFi networks in San Jose, the Council Bluffs BLINK Community Network, the Atlanta Police Department wireless video network in downtown Atlanta, along with modeling and design work for the City of Mountain View, San Mateo County, City of Los Angeles, City of Tucson, City of Hayward, City of Bristol VA, and City of Austin. Past experience includes being Lead RF Engineer for the Council Bluffs BLINK Community Network, the Eastside Union High School District Community Networks with the City of San Jose, and Wickedly Fast WiFi network in San Jose, performing an RF Feasibility study for a wireless mesh network for Microsoft, Lead RF Engineer for the Google Mesh Network in Mountain View, and various

network modeling and RF design work for other municipal entities. Nikolay is experienced with Mesh, Point to Multipoint, and Point to Point technologies. He is well versed on a number of engineering tools and propagation software tools and is often the “preferred” request by our clients requiring complex wireless network design, such as Cisco Professional Services. He has worked with and supported a variety of municipal applications within these projects to include Transportation, Police, Fire and Information Services.

Nikolay is experienced with a variety of RF Tools including Sunset T10, Sunset E20, AM8e, FIREBERD 6000, Oscilloscopes, Agilent HP 8563e Spectrum Analyzer, Anritsu MS2721a Spectrum Analyzer, AirMagnet Mobile Suite, VSWR meter, RF power meter, TV vector scope, PAL\SECAM signal generator. He is also proficient in the following software required for Network Architecture services: EDX SignalPro 6.2, PathLoss 4, Motorola LAN planer, Motorola MESH planer, MapInfo Professional 8.5, ArcGIS 9.1 , Adobe Photoshop CS2, AutoCAD2007, Globalmapper 9, SATmaster PRO MK 6.5, Intelsat LST 5, MathCAD 14, MS Visio, LabView, , MS Word, MS Excel, MS Access, MS

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 10
Restricted
Project Finance
Kevin Brangers
Project Engineer
Walter Orell
Installation Lead
Keith Follen
Project Manager
Josh Kehl
Project Executive
Al Brown
Field Survey Teams
Lead RF Engineer
Nikolay Yumatov
Outlook. Google SketchUp , Google Earth Pro. Mr. Yumatov graduated with Honors with a MSEE from Penza State University in Penza, Russia.

B.2 - Project Organizational Chart
The staffing approach recognizes the need for coordination and continuity, combined with the need for unique project planning and technical design skills. We believe the proposed resources will provide the project guidance necessary and create a smooth transition through various project milestones and tasks as required.

B.3
– Certifications
Comtrain – Tower Safety
Structural Engineer Support Technicians Support Engineer(s) Installation Teams Network Engineer(s) Distribution Team

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 11
Restricted
OSHA - Work Safety
Lift and Bucket Truck – Aerial Operations
CWNA – Wireless Expertise
h e r e b y c o n f e r s u p o n
Walter Orell
t h e d e s i g n a t i o n
C e r t i f i e d W i r e l e s sN e t w o r k A d m i n i s t r a t o r
i n r e c o g n i t i o n o f h a v i n g s u c c e s s f u l l y c o m p l e t e d t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r t h a t d e s i g n a t i o n.

T h i s c e r t i f i c a t e i s v a l i d u n t i l
21 Sep 2025
T o m C a r p e n t e
r
CTO
M e m b e r I D
# :
248586
N
N
s
A
seleri
W
dei fitreC rotartsini
mdAkro
C
w
W
te

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 12
Restricted
Tucson Business License – T3002925

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 13
Restricted
C – METHOD OF APPROACH AND AVAILABLE RESOURCES TO COMPLETE WORK C.1 - SmartWAVE Methodology
SmartWAVE takes a methodical approach in designing wireless network infrastructures.

This section provides an overview of the Statement of Work necessary to successfully complete this project.

Figure 1. SmartWAVE Methodology
Network Planning Phase
The purpose of this phase is to better understand the area, requirements, and determine the components and architecture of the network. Based on boundaries, general coverage and capacity requirements, redundancy requirements, device type, fiber location information, and any other asset agreements provided by customer, SmartWAVE will perform the following work:
o Gather Building, GIS and land use data and generate estimated number of nodes based on provided information and general area types
o Cut Clutter to depict RF Environment obstacles for outdoor radio locations o Utilize tools-based software analysis to identify:
■ Potential issues with Backhaul/Capacity Injection
■ Topology, trees, and building/housing coverage issues ■ Potential mounting assets required to meet general coverage area requirements

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 14
Restricted
■ Potential access coverage/exclusion area issues
o Create a preliminary high level design document containing:
■ Network requirements
■ AP estimates from Land use and general drive area
■ Preliminary BOM for materials required
■ Radio and antenna mounting recommendations
o Provide predictive model for coverage, identifying ingress/egress points, and exclusion areas
Network Design Phase
NOTE: The above is the propagation model for the ESUSHD Overfelt Community WiFi network consisting of 200 Mesh WiFi Access Points.

The purpose of this phase is to validate the network architecture developed during the Planning Phase and collect data regarding mounting assets and locations. During this stage, SmartWAVE will perform the following work:
o Perform requested site surveys to validate selection of mounting assets, and issues with assets (e.g. power), no assets available, and interference problems.

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 15
Restricted
o Conduct basic analysis of access coverage, backhaul/capacity links, redundancy, and hop counts
o Identify and document mounting solutions at each surveyed location o Conduct an RF sweep at each AP location
o Conduct an RF drive sweep of the coverage area
Design Phase Deliverables
Upon completion of the Wireless Network Planning and Design Phases, SmartWAVE will provide the necessary documentation required to begin the configuration, commissioning and deployment of the network. Deliverables will include the following:
o Create Survey and Design Document
o Create updated BOM and Cost Estimate for Implementation o Identify Customer Network Requirements
o Define basic network configurations for nodes plus identify any site/node specific parameters
o Create configuration spreadsheet with design information o Conduct as-needed design review meetings and provide document updates as needed
Installation Phase
Upon completion of review of the design phase, SmartWAVE will work with the Client to deploy the wireless network. During this phase,
SmartWAVE will provide the following services:
o Configure and test Management Platform
o Configure and test all wired and wireless radio
equipment included in the bill of materials
o Install all mounting hardware for radio equipment
o Install and align all directional antennas
o Install grounding wire, surge protection and weatherproof all connectors on outdoor radio equipment with external antennas
o Move wireless equipment to production

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 16
Restricted
o Perform post installation point coverage test using AirMagnet or similar software for radio service areas
o Document the final implementation
Installation Phase Deliverables
o As-built documentation of installed network to include all outdoor wireless radio equipment
o As-built design document to include heat map of final installation o Provide an AP Inventory to include Serial Numbers and MAC Addresses o Develop operational turnover documentation to transition the installed network to Maintenance and Support
C.2 - Expedited Process
SmartWAVE can easily accelerate the project through additional of installation resources. Because our methodology establishes “toll gates” through the process, we can “stair step” the implementation process to perform multiple projects in an expedited fashion. An example of the “stair step” approach is as follows:

Project 1 Propagation Modeling Field Surveys Installation Testing Project 2 Propagation Modeling Field Surveys Installation Testing Project 3 Propagation Modeling Field Surveys Installation Testing C.3 - Statement of Work
SmartWAVE has reviewed and will provide the services as listed in RFP pages 5-6.

Sample work products are uploaded to the procurement site as separate files.

Required Services
SmartWAVE will provide complete end-to-end point-to-point or point-to-multipoint wireless solutions which may require the following:
• Site surveys and field investigation to verify installation requirements and path obstructions/line-of-site.
• Survey reports which may include path maps, terrain profiles, link budgets, antenna heights, path reliability calculations, etc.

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 17
Restricted
• Design drawings which may include installation diagrams, tower elevations, equipment specifications, etc.
• Record drawings ("as-builts") following a final inspection and resolution of any punch list items.
• Installation, including masts, mounts, ballast blocks, grounding and lightning protection, conduit and roof support blocks for conduit, hardware, network and fiber cable, etc.
• Installation of monopoles or free-standing towers, including foundations and any required permits.
• Tower climbing and the use of aerial lifts.
• Remote monitoring. City of Tucson will support remote connectivity to individual IP addresses by VPN.
• Filing for FCC licensing, under City of Tucson's FRN, if applicable.

Equipment Requirements
• SmartWAVE is proposing a variety of wireless equipment options to provide appropriate and cost-effective solutions for differing requirements (path distance, licensed or unlicensed, bandwidths of 100 Mbps to >1 Gbps, reliability).
• All Equipment proposed will support out of band network management.

Maintenance and Support
• SmartWAVE will include a minimum of a one-year full warranty for any newly installed link.
• All warranty items, issues, and concerns shall be resolved at no charge to the City of Tucson.
• This shall include, but not limited to, parts, freight, travel, labor, etc. • SmartWAVE is including an option to renew maintenance services for all active links on an annual basis in the pricing section of this response. • Maintenance fees are not expected to include equipment spares/replacement costs.
• Warranty all parts and services provided by any subcontractor as if supplied by the bidder.

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 18
Restricted
• All equipment furnished under the scope of this contract shall be new, current technology, and not approaching end-of-life. Equipment shall be a standard product of the manufacturer of the component to be furnished. • Provide standard maintenance services from 8 AM to 4 PM Mountain Standard Time, Monday through Friday (excluding City of Tucson holidays), with a response time of 4 business hours and a restoration time of 24 hours. • Provide an option for 24/7/365 maintenance services on select critical links, with a response time of 2 hours and a restoration time of 6 hours. • Maintain a local supply of critical equipment spares. • SmartWAVE is providing a pricing page as a separate attachment with this response, that will cover the products and services related to this proposal.

C.4 – Quality Assurance/Quality Control
The SmartWAVE Methodology leads to enhancements in our quality control process.

We use a “toll-gate” approach where we do not move from one phase to the next until all tasks are completed as required. We provide this methodology in Section C.1, but the following diagram shows all phases as a single page, along with those tasks in each phase that represent the greatest risk to project budgets and timelines, noted in “red”:

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 19
Restricted
C.5 – Bonding
SmartWAVE is fully capable of bonding any project for Tucson requiring performance and payment bonds. If required for a project, SmartWAVE will list the cost of the Bond as a separate line item so the City can determine whether the additional expense is required based on the risks associated with the project.

SmartWAVE has previously bonded projects in excess of $3M in Tucson, and in excess of $10M in other markets. The costs of the bond will vary slightly based on contract terms, but is typically 1-2% above the Libor rate.

C.6 – Training and Safety
SmartWAVE believes in a “safety first” approach in all field exercises to include such activities as electrical work, installation in the right of way, and tower climbing.

The SmartWAVE Work Safety Policy is comprised 7 categories of focus:

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 20
Restricted
SmartWAVE requires all Tower climbers to receive certification from Comtrain for Tower Safety Climbing.

SmartWAVE drivers attend the Altec Aerial Device Operator Safety Training.

SmartWAVE Lift operators attend classes provided by Liftoff.

C.7 – Tools (Hardware and Software)
SmartWAVE uses a variety of tools in providing design, installation and support services for outdoor wireless networks. The list of tools include, but are not limited to, the following items:
 Bucket Truck (with Insulated Bucket)

Outdoor modeling tools to include EDX Pro, Global Mapper, and Google Network Planner
 Testing tools to include Fluke, Airmagnet and Anritsu  Sunsight Antenna Alignment Tool
 Safety Climb Gear to include harnesses and pulleys

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 21
Restricted
D – SUBCONTRACTOR SELECTION PLAN
SmartWAVE plans to self-fulfill the majority of tasks required to provide the services requested. Resource Availability is not an issue at this time.

Although Resource Availability is not an issue at this time, if that changes and we do need to subcontract services for specific trade disciplines required, we will select subcontractors based on the following criteria:

1. Safety Procedures
Safety is always a top priority when it comes to subcontractor selection, especially when it involves tower construction or electrical work. This being so, SmartWAVE requires subcontractors to provide their safety policies and procedures for review. We review the plan to insure it provides a clear understanding of the company’s processes for identifying workplace hazards, correcting unsafe conditions, establishing safety training programs, and establishing environments where safety issues can be expressed without concern.

As we continue the qualification of subcontractors, we assess their Experience Modification Rates, OSHA recordable incidents, and time loss due to accidents.

2. Project and Financial References
SmartWAVE requests a minimum of three references for similar work in the trades required. We also request credit references to insure the company if financially solvent.

3. Adequate Staffing and Manpower
SmartWAVE requests a manpower loading schedule for jobs that extend over longer periods of time.

4. Adequate Equipment
SmartWAVE requests all subcontractors to provide detailed confirmation of their ability to provide the necessary hardware, software, testing and/or commercial construction equipment required for the tasks to be assigned. The items provided by the subcontractor must meet all of our standards and are readily available for the project assignment. If heavy equipment is required, it should be maintained in working order for safety purposes, and any costs associated with equipment, should include fuel,

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 22
Restricted
shipping and or other items as required so there are no surprises with respect to project costs and availability.

5. Price
Price is obviously always going to be an important factor when choosing a subcontractor. We know to be competitive, general contractors need subcontractors that can deliver results at a competitive price. However, choosing a subcontractor solely based on price can really expose us to a lot of risk. If a subcontractor has a poor safety record, limited experience, or a track record of delivering second rate work, it can not only lead to expensive problems down the line, but it can also damage our reputation. While price is important, paying fair market value is essential for hiring a subcontractor that can get the job done right.

6. Communication
Working with a subcontractor that is transparent and accessible is absolutely key to commercial construction project success. A good subcontractor will set expectations upfront around communication and will be easy to track down. Our subcontractors are an extension of our team, so our communication lead is there when needed. We also ensure our subcontractor isn’t juggling too many commercial construction projects at once, and that they have the bandwidth to give our project the attention needed.

7. Double Check Licenses And Insurance
Prior to making a final decision, we double check the prospective subcontractor’s applicable licenses are up to date and that they possess the right credentials, training, and certifications necessary for your commercial construction project. Even though our insurance policies cover subcontractors, we request they have general liability and workers compensation policies.

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 23
Restricted
E – PRODUCTS PROPOSED
SmartWAVE is proposing a variety of products to support the varying needs by the City of Tucson. All of the products listed are included in the Menu of Pricing provided in Section F of this response:

Tarana Wireless – High Bandwidth PTMP Product offering using Massive MIMO Antennas and Noise Cancelling technologies to provide up to 800Mbps to each subscriber and extended range of up to 10 miles, operating in the 5GHz or 3.5GHz spectrum.

Siklu – High Bandwidth PTP and PTMP product lines using Millimeter Wave and Terragraph Technologies to offer multi-gigabit fixed wireless connectivity using the 60GHz and 80GHz spectrum.

SIAE – Multi-gigabit Licensed PTP Microwave product portfolio offering solutions in the 6GHz, 11GHz, 18GHz and other licensed spectrums. Products include single radio architectures or split systems.

Ruckus – WiFi Mesh technology with extensive portfolio for indoor and outdoor applications, and a variety of control features that could operate as an appliance or in the Cloud. Proprietary Beamflex technology in concert with an antenna array provide for high capacity and low noise at the client receive end, providing for a great WiFi experience.

Mimosa – WiFi based cost effective PTP and PTMP solution offering speeds up to 1Gbps with products in the 24GHz and 5GHz spectrum.

Inscape Data – Ruggedized and outdoor switching and POE solutions offering speeds up to 10Gbps and POE capabilities up to 90W.

Product Data Sheets are attached separately.

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 24
Restricted
F – PRICING
F.1 – Menu of Pricing
No Product Description Material Labor Total Unit Price Pricing Notes PTMP Unit Pricing
1 Terragraph 60GHz Distribution Node Installed $ 2,900.00 $ 2,575.00 $ 5,475.00 Includes Terragraph Distribution Node, Mounting Bracket, Outdoor Rated POE Switch, Photocell Power Cable,
Installation (Does not include conduit, NEMA Enclosure, Electrical Work, or Tower Work). Assumes location is roof top or bucket truck accessible.
2 Terragraph 60GHz Client Node (1Gbps) -
Installed on a Street Light or Building $ 900.00 $ 1,250.00 $ 2,150.00 Includes Radio/Subsriber Unit/CPE, Mounting Bracket,
Outdoor Rated POE Injector, Photocell Power Cable, Surge Protection, Installation (Does not include conduit, NEMA Enclosure, or Electrical Work). Assumes location is a street light or utility pole and is bucket truck accessible.
3 5GHz Unlicensed BSU (1Gbps) - Installed $ 2,675.00 $ 2,575.00 $ 5,250.00 Includes Radio/Base Station Unit, Mounting Bracket, Outdoor Rated POE Switch, Photocell Power Cable, Installation (Does not include conduit, NEMA Enclosure, Electrical Work, or Tower Work). Assumes location is roof top or bucket truck accessible.
4 5GHz Unlicensed SU (500Mbps) - Installed on a
Street Light or Traffic Signal $ 650.00 $ 1,250.00 $ 1,900.00 Includes Radio/Subsriber Unit/CPE, Mounting Bracket,
Outdoor Rated POE Injector, Photocell Power Cable, Surge Protection, Installation (Does not include conduit, NEMA Enclosure, or Electrical Work). Assumes location is a street light or utility pole and is bucket truck accessible.
5 Massive MIMO 5GHz Unlicensed BSU (2.4Gbps)
- Tower Installed $ 20,500.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 24,500.00
Includes Radio/Base Node, Tower Mounting Bracket, Fiber Cabling, DC Power Cabling, Installation (Does not include conduit, Sled, NEMA Enclosure, or Electrical Work). Assumes location is Tower Mounted.
6 Massive MIMO 5GHz Unlicensed SU (800Mbps) -
Installed on a Street Light or Traffic Signal $ 1,500.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 3,500.00 Includes Radio/Subsriber Unit/CPE, Mounting Bracket,
Outdoor Rated POE Injector, Photocell Power Cable, Surge Protection, Installation, 1YR Subscription (Does not include conduit, NEMA Enclosure, or Electrical Work). Assumes
location is a street light or utility pole and is bucket truck accessible.

PTP - Licensed and Unlicensed Unit Pricing
7 Licensed 11/18GHz PTP Link (Up to 1Gbps) -
Installed $ 23,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 30,000.00
Includes 2 Radios, Antennas, Power supplies, Surge
Protection, 250FT Cat6 Cable, Tower Mounts, License
Registration, Path Analysis and Installation (Does not include conduit, electrical work, switches, or NEMA Enclosures) 8 Unlicensed 24GHz or 60GHz PTP Link (Up to
1Gbps) - Installed $ 6,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 10,000.00
Includes 2 Radios, Antennas, Power supplies, Surge
Protection, 250FT Cat6 Cable, Tower Mounts, Path Analysis and Installation (Does not include conduit, electrical work, switches, or NEMA Enclosures)
9 Unlicensed 5GHz 1Gbps PTP Link $ 2,500.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 6,500.00 Includes 2 Radios, Antennas, Power supplies, Surge
Protection, 250FT Cat6 Cable, Tower Mounts, Path Analysis and Installation (Does not include conduit, electrical work, switches, or NEMA Enclosures)
Mesh Access Point Unit Pricing
10 Pole Mounted Root AP Location (High Capacity
4x4+ AP) - Installed $ 3,400.00 $ 1,750.00 $ 5,150.00
Includes Root Mesh AP, Outdoor POE Switch, Surge
Protection, Photocell Power Cable, Mounting Brackets, AP License, Installation
11 Pole Mounted Mesh AP Location (High Capacity
4x4+ AP) - Installed $ 2,400.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 3,900.00
Includes Mesh AP, Outdoor POE Injector, Surge Protection, Photocell Power Cable, Mounting Brackets, AP License,
Installation
12 Pole Mounted Root AP Location (2x2 MIMO or
comparable) - Installed $ 2,000.00 $ 1,750.00 $ 3,750.00 Includes Root Mesh AP, Outdoor POE Switch, Surge
Protection, Photocell Power Cable, Mounting Brackets, AP License, Installation
13 Pole Mounted Mesh AP Location (2x2 MIMO or
comparable) - Installed $ 1,250.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 2,750.00 Includes Mesh AP, Outdoor POE Injector, Surge Protection, Photocell Power Cable, Mounting Brackets, AP License,
Installation

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 25
Restricted
No Product Description Material Labor Total Unit Price Pricing Notes Other Unit Pricing Items
14 Mesh AP Cloud Control and Support - 1 Year $ 225.00 $ 225.00 Per Device - Network monitoring, optimization and Truck Roll services required for maintenance related services. Does not include move, add, change work, or manufacturer extended warranties.
15 Unlicensed PTP/PTMP Support - 1 Year $ 450.00 $ 450.00 Per Device - Network monitoring, optimization and Truck Roll services required for maintenance related services. Does not include move, add, change work, or manufacturer extended warranties.
16 Licensed Microwave PTP Link Support to
include PCN Responses - 1 Year $ 750.00 $ 750.00
Per Device - Network monitoring, optimization and Truck Roll services required for maintenance related services. Does not include move, add, change work, or manufacturer extended warranties.
17 Nokia Hardware - Percent Off List Price 30% 30% Percent off list price for all Nokia Hardware 18 Nokia Support - Percent Off List Price 0% 0% Percent off list price for all Nokia Support 19 Siklu Hardware - Percent Off List Price 15% 15% Percent off list price for all Siklu Hardware 20 Siklu Support - Percent Off List Price 0% 0% Percent off list price for all Siklu Support 21 Cambium Hardware - Percent Off List Price 10% 10% Percent off list price for all Cambium Hardware 22 Cambium Support - Percent Off List Price 0% 0% Percent off list price for all Cambium Support 23 Tarana Hardware - Percent Off List 5% 5% Percent off list price for all Tarana Hardware 24 Tarana Subscription/Support - Percent Off List 0% 0% Percent off list price for all Tarana Subscriptions/support 25 Ruckus Hardware - Percent Off List Price 35% 35% Percent off list price for all Ruckus Hardware 26 Ruckus Support - Percent Off List Price 0% 0% Percent off list price for all Ruckus Support 27 Wireless Appurtenant Equipment or
Subcontractor - Cost plus 20% 20% 20% Cost plus 20%
28 Senior RF/Network Engineer Hourly Rate $ 200.00 $ 200.00 Does not include Travel or Expenses. Rates may be reduced based on quantity of hours.
29 Project Manager Hourly Rate $ 165.00 $ 165.00 Does not include Travel or Expenses. Rates may be reduced based on quantity of hours.
30 RF/Installation Technician Hourly Rate $ 105.00 $ 105.00 Does not include Travel or Expenses. Rates may be reduced based on quantity of hours.
31 Tower Work Upcharge (if required) $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 Two Man Crew Per Day The following pricing notes apply:
1 Site Acquisition Services are not included in install estimates. If required, hourly rates of $250/hr for Site Acquisition services will apply. 2 PE Stamped drawings are not included.
3 Zoning, permitting or environmental services are not included. 4 RF/Network Design, Survey, Modeling, etc are NOT included in Unit Install Pricing. 5 Equipment Configuration and Testing is included in Unit Install Pricing. 6 Pricing listed is subject to a mutually agreeable contract between SmartWave and Client. 7 If not mentioned in the line item, all wireless solutions assume the customer provided switch/router is the demarcation point 8 Sales Tax is not included in Unit Pricing.
9 Costs associated with Bonds and Permits are not included in the price.

NOTE: All projects requiring labor hours of more than 40 hours per trade will be extended a discount of up to 10% on the price listed.

F.2 – Cooperative Agreement
SmartWAVE will offer a 0.5% incentive to the City of Tucson for use of the Cooperative Agreement. The incentive will apply to each purchase order received over $250,000.

The incentive will be paid upon full receipt of the PO amount from the customer using the Cooperative Agreement.

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 1
Restricted
Introduction
SmartWAVE Technologies (SmartWAVE) appreciates this opportunity to provide this proposal in response to the JOC for Design, Installation and Maintenance of Point-to-Point/Point-to- Multipoint wireless Backhaul. SmartWAVE is a national leading “wireless” centric systems integrator that provides the planning, design, integration and managed services for wireless networks, along with the unique applications that these networks support. We’ve been providing these services to the Smart City market since 2007. We have also been providing design, installation and maintenance services for point-to-point (PTP) and point-to-multipoint (PTMP) wireless networks to the City of Tucson since our founding in 2007.

Throughout the years in serving the City of Tucson, we’ve had the opportunity to deploy a wide variety of wireless technologies to support a variety of applications. As these technologies have changed over time, as well as team members for the City and for SmartWAVE, we have continued to meet our service levels and contractual obligations. We are grateful to the City of Tucson for all of the opportunities provided to us over this time, and we hope to expand on these experiences with this opportunity.

We realize that deployment of large scale, outdoor wireless networks can be extremely complex. Our experience and methodology for deploying these types of networks has led to our success. We would argue there is no other company in Arizona, much less throughout the United States, that has the experience comparable to SmartWAVE for municipal owned wireless network deployments.

RFP Certification
In our response to this opportunity, we would also like to certify the following in adherence to the RFP requirements:

A. SmartWAVE’s submission of the offer did not involve collusion or other anti-competitive practices.

B. SmartWAVE will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment in violation of Federal or State law.

C. SmartWAVE has not given, offered to give, nor intends to give at any time hereafter, any economic opportunity, future employment, gift, loan, gratuity, special discount, trip, favor, meal or service to a public servant in connection with the submitted offer.

D. SmartWAVE hereby certifies that the individual signing the submittal is an authorized agent for the Offeror and has the authority to bind the Offeror to the Contract.

Why SmartWAVE
Understanding the needs for this project, we’re confident you will find our qualifications and experience are in perfect alignment with this opportunity in that:
1) SmartWAVE is a Tucson Licensed Business with operation facilities in Tucson, so we can quickly respond to urgent and scheduled requests.

A – COVER LETTER

SmartWAVE Technologies LLC Page 2
Restricted
2) SmartWAVE currently has a large portion of network components (to include City Traffic Controllers) integrated into our PRTG Monitoring system. Any other Respondent would have to invest in and discover all network equipment and build tables in order to get a “global” view of the network and associated problems.
3) SmartWAVE is currently under contract to maintain other PTP and PTMP wireless networks for government entities in the area to include Golder Ranch Fire Department, Drexel Heights Fire Department, SunTran, Northwest Fire, Pima County, and others. 4) SmartWAVE’s Trouble Ticket System, that the City is using today, can be used as an online tool to open and track tickets to closure showing full ticket history to include resources assigned, problem identified and steps to resolution. 5) SmartWAVE has Bucket Trucks in Tucson, which are required to access radios on street lights, roof tops and certain “non-climbable” towers.
6) SmartWAVE has Tower Safety Trained personnel in market for those locations where Tower Climbing is required. We can easily meet the SLA response requirements through self-fulfillment of resources, where others responding from outside of Tucson will have to subcontract these services.
7) SmartWAVE has built the 5 largest municipal owned Community Wireless Broadband Networks in the United States. These experiences bring tremendous value to every client that we work with on large outdoor wireless network deployments. 8) SmartWAVE has a warehouse in Tucson with inventory of wireless equipment, and we can offer dispatch capabilities that simply can’t be matched by our competitors.

Products Proposed and Pricing
SmartWAVE is recommending a number of innovative wireless products in this response. We are also providing pricing for products and for services. The Product information is provided in the Statement of Qualifications document in Section E, and the Pricing information is provide in the Statement of Qualifications document in Section F.

Contact Information
If you have any questions regarding this document, or the content herein, please don’t hesitate to contact Al Brown at 404-731-9580 or [email protected].

Thank you for your consideration!
Al Brown
President/CEO
2662 Holcomb Bridge Rd #340
Alpharetta, GA 30022
404-731-9580
[email protected]

SMART CITY
SOLUTION PROVIDERS - 2018

Restricted

DATA SHEET
RUCKUS® T350
Outdoor 802.11ax 2x2:2 Wi-Fi Access Point
Benefits

SIMPLICITY
RUCKUS' Outdoor APs make Wi-Fi deployments
extremely simple to deploy with one-touch technologies
like SmartMesh™.

STUNNING WI-FI PERFORMANCE
Extends coverage with patented BeamFlex®+ adaptive
antenna technology while mitigating interference by
utilizing up to 64 directional antenna patterns.

GREAT OUTDOOR WI-FI
Experience high performance outdoor Wi-Fi 6 with IP-67
weather proofing.

MULTIPLE MANAGEMENT OPTIONS
Manage the T350 Series with physical or virtual
controller appliances.

SERVE MORE DEVICES
Connect more devices simultaneously with two MU-
MIMO spatial streams and concurrent dual-band

2.4/5GHz radios while also enhancing non-11ax device
performance.

AUTOMATE OPTIMAL THROUGHPUT
ChannelFly® dynamic channel technology uses machine
learning to automatically find the least congested
channels. You always get the highest throughput the
band can support.

MORE THAN WI-FI
Support services beyond Wi-Fi with
RUCKUS IoT Suite,
Cloudpath security and onboarding software, SPoT Wi-Fi
locationing engine, and SCI network analytics.

Modern Wi-Fi device users expect reliable connectivity—anywhere, anytime.

But in crowded outdoor venues with thousands of users and constant RF noise, they are often frustrated by poor coverage, dropped connections, and reduced data rates. These aggravating Wi-Fi experiences can easily translate to negative perceptions of the venue and the service provider, resulting in loss of business.

The quality of the network experience becomes the "litmus test" for acceptance or rejection.

As the market leader in outdoor Wi-Fi deployments, RUCKUS knows that one AP solution cannot meet every possible challenge of varied and complex outdoor requirements. This is why the RUCKUS T350 Wi-Fi 6 series is designed with more variety than any other outdoor AP in the market today. Available with either internal omni-directional antennas or internal high-gain directional antenna models, the T350 Series uses patented RUCKUS antenna optimization and interference mitigation technologies to improve throughput, connection reliability, and deliver industry-leading Wi-Fi 6 performance to every connected client. At the same time, the T350 Series is designed for fast, simple installation with an ultra-lightweight, low profile, IP-67 rated enclosure that can stand up to the most challenging outdoor environments.

At RUCKUS, we know that outdoor AP deployments are especially challenging for installation and maintenance, which is why RUCKUS outdoor APs use a variety of technologies, like SmartMesh that help simplify outdoor AP deployment.

The RUCKUS T350 Series is perfect for high-density outdoor public venues such as airports, convention centers, plazas, malls, smart cities, and other dense urban environments. By providing a superior Wi-Fi experience to every user in high-density outdoor locations, venue operators can improve guest satisfaction and loyalty, deliver new kinds of wireless application services, and increase revenues.

The RUCKUS T350 Series incorporates patented technologies found only in the RUCKUS Wi-Fi portfolio.
 Extended coverage with patented BeamFlex+ utilizing multi-directional antenna patterns.  Improve throughput with ChannelFly, which dynamically finds less congested Wi-Fi channels to use.

Whether you're deploying ten or ten thousand APs, the T350 Series is easy to manage through RUCKUS' appliance and virtual management options.

© 2021 Commscope, Inc. All rights reserved. 2
Restricted
RUCKUS T350
Outdoor 802.11ax 2x2:2 Wi-Fi Access Point
Access Point Antenna Pattern
RUCKUS' BeamFlex+ adaptive antennas allow the T350 AP to dynamically choose among a host of antenna patterns in real-time to establish the best possible connection with every device. This leads to:
 Better Wi-Fi coverage
 Reduced RF interference
Traditional omni-directional antennas, found in generic access points, oversaturate the environment by needlessly radiating RF signals in all directions. In contrast, the RUCKUS BeamFlex+ adaptive antenna directs the radio signals per-device on a packet by-packet basis to optimize Wi-Fi coverage and capacity in real-time to support high device density environments. BeamFlex+ operates without the need for device feedback and hence can benefit even devices using legacy standards.

Figure 1. Example of Beamflex+ pattern
Figure 2. T350c/d 2.4GHz Azimuth
Antenna Patterns
Figure 3. T350c/d 5GHz Azimuth
Antenna Patterns
Figure 4. T350c/d 2.4GHz Elevation
Antenna Patterns
Figure 5. T350c/d 5GHz Elevation
Antenna Patterns
Note: The outer trace represents the composite RF footprint of all possible BeamFlex+ antenna patterns, while the inner trace represents one BeamFlex+ antenna pattern within the composite outer trace.

© 2021 Commscope, Inc. All rights reserved. 3
Restricted
RUCKUS T350
Outdoor 802.11ax 2x2:2 Wi-Fi Access Point
WI-FI
Wi-Fi Standards  IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax
Supported Rates
 802.11ax: 4 to 1774 Mbps
 802.11ac: 6.5 to 867 Mbps
 802.11n: 6.5 to 300Mbps
 802.11a/g: 6 to 54 Mbps
 802.11b: 1 to 11 Mbps
Supported Channels
 2.4GHz: 1-13
 5GHz: 36-64, 100-144, 149-165
MIMO
 2x2 SU-MIMO
 2x2 MU-MIMO
Spatial Streams
 2 streams SU/MU MIMO 5GHz
 2 streams SU/MU MIMO 2.4GHz
Radio Chains and Streams
 2x2:2 (5GHz)
 2x2:2 (2.4GHz)
C
hannelization  20,
40, 80MHz
S
ecurity
 WP
A-PSK, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-Personal, WPA2-Enterprise,
WPA3-Personal, WPA3-Enterprise, AES, 802.11i, Dynamic

PSK, OWE
 WIPS/WIDS
Other
Wi-Fi Features
 WMM,
Power Save, Tx Beamforming, LDPC, STBC,
802.11r/k/v
 Hotspot, Hotspot 2.0
 Captive Portal
 WISPr
5GHZ RECEIVE SENSITIVITY
VHT20 VHT40 VHT80
MCS0 MCS7 MCS8 MCS9 MCS0 MCS7 M
CS8 M
CS9 MCS0 MCS7 M
CS8 MCS9
-95 -76 -72 -70 -92 -73 -6
9 -6
7 -89 -70 -6
6 -64
HE20 HE40 HE80
MCS0 MCS7 MCS9 MCS11 MCS0 MCS7 M
CS9 M
CS11 MCS0 MCS7 M
CS9 MCS11
-95 -76 -70 -65 -92 -73 -6
7 -6
2 -89 -70 -6
4 -59

2.4GHZ TX POWER TARGET
Rate Pout (dBm)
MCS0 HT20 23
MCS7 HT20 18
MCS8 VHT20 17
MCS9 V
HT40 1

6.5 MCS11 H
E40 1
5 5GHZ TX POWER TARGET
Rate Pout (dBm)
MCS0 VHT20 22
MCS7 VHT40, VHT80 20
MCS9 VHT40, VHT80 19
MCS11 HE20, HE40, HE80 15
RF
T
350c T350d T350se
Ant
enna Type
I
nternal omnidir-
ectional
I
nternal omnidir-
ectional
Inter
nal 120 deg
sectorized + N-
type female
external
connectors
BeamFlex
+ adaptive antennas with polarization
diversity
Antenna Gain (max) Up
to 3dBi TBD
Peak Transmit Power (Tx port/chain
+ 3dB Combining gain)

2.4GHz: 26
dBm
5GHz: 25 dBm

2.4GHz: TBD
5GHz: TBD
Fre
quency Bands
 ISM
(2.4-2.484GHz)
 U-NII-1 (5.15-5.25GHz)
 U-NII-2A (5.25-5.35GHz)
 U-NII-2C (5.47-5.725GHz)
 U-NII-3 (5.725-5.85GHz)

PERFORMANCE AND CAPACITY
Peak PHY Rates
 2.4GHz: 574 Mbps
5GHz: 1200 Mbps
Client Capacity  Up to 512 clients per AP
SSID  Up to 31 per AP

RUCKUS RADIO MANAGEMENT
Antenna Optimization
 BeamFlex+
 Polarization Diversity with Maximal Ratio Combining (PD- MRC)
Wi-Fi Channel Management
 ChannelFly
 Background Scan Based
Client Density Management
 Adaptive Band Balancing
 Client Load Balancing
 Airtime Fairness
 Airtime-based WLAN Prioritization
SmartCast Quality of Service
 QoS-based scheduling
 Directed Multicast
 L2/L3/L4 ACLs
Mobility  SmartRoam
Diagnostic Tools
 Spectrum Analysis
 SpeedFlex

2.4GHZ RECEIVE SENSITIVITY
HT20 HT40 VHT20 VHT40
MCS0 MCS7 MCS0 MCS7 MCS0 MCS7 MCS0 M
CS7
-94 -75 -91 -72 -94 -75 -91 -7
2 HE20 HE40
MCS0 MCS7 MCS9 MCS11 MCS0 MCS7 MCS9 M
CS11
-94 -75 -71 -65 -91 -72 -68 -6
2

© 2021 Commscope, Inc. All rights reserved. 4
Restricted
RUCKUS T350
Outdoor 802.11ax 2x2:2 Wi-Fi Access Point
2 Max power varies by country setting, band, and MCS rate. 3 For complete list of WFA certifications, please see Wi-Fi Alliance website. 4 For current certification status, please see price list.

NETWORKING
Controller Platform Support
 SmartZone
 ZoneDirector
 Unleashed
 Cloud
 Standalone
Mesh
 SmartMesh™ wireless meshing technology. Self-healing
Mesh
IP  IPv4, IPv6
VLAN
 802.1Q (1 per BSSID or dynamic per use based on RADIUS)  VLAN Pooling
 Port-based
802.1x  Authenticator & Supplicant
Tunnel  L2TP, GRE, soft-GRE
Policy Management Tools
 Application Recognition and Control
 Access Control Lists
 Device Fingerprinting
 Rate Limiting
IoT  T350d: Integrated BLE and Zigbee (1 radio, switchable) POWER2
T
350c T
350d T350se
Power Mode System Configuration Max
Power Consumption (includes
USB power)
802.3at (PoE) - Class 4 Full Functionality 1

3.24W 1

7.57W TBD
802.3af (PoE) - Class 3
USB Disabled
IoT Disabled
1 1.42W 1

2.94W TBD
Idle (PoE) 7
.68W 7
.78W TBD
DC - max power Full Functionality — 1

6.32W TBD
DC - idle — 6
.78W TBD

CERTIFICATIONS AND COMPLIANCE
Wi-Fi Alliance3
 Wi-Fi CERTIFIED™ a, b, g, n, ac
 Wi-Fi CERTIFIED™ 6
 WPA3™ - Enterprise, Personal
 Wi-Fi Enhanced Open™
 Wi-Fi Agile Multiband™
 Wi-Fi Optimized Connectivity™
 Wi-Fi Vantage™
 WMM®
 Passpoint®
Standards Compliance4
 EN 60950-1 Safety
 EN 60601-1-2 Medical
 EN 61000-4-2/3/5 Immunity
 EN 50121-1 Railway EMC
 EN 50121-4 Railway Immunity
 IEC 61373 Railway Shock & Vibration
 UL 2043 Plenum
 EN 62311 Human Safety/RF Exposure
 WEEE & RoHS
 ISTA 2A Transportation

PHYSICAL INTERFACES
T
350c T350d T350se
Ethernet 1
x 1GbE port, RJ-45 PoE In - 802.3at Class 4
USB — 1 USB 2.0 port, Type A
DC Power — 12V DC Terminal Block (7V - 20V)

PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
T
350c T350d T350se
Physical Size
 162.3 m
m
(W) x 194.9
mm (L) x 80.9
mm (H)
 6.38 in (W) x

7.67 in (L) x

3.19 in (H)
 162.3 mm
(W) x 213.7
mm (L) x 80.9
mm (H)
 6.38 in (W) x

8.41 in (L) x

3.19 in (H)
 209.1 mm
(W) x 261.7
mm (L) x
102.5 mm (H)
 8.23 in (W) x

10.30 in (L) x

4.04 in (H)
Weight (w/ included bracket) 1.01kg
(2.23lbs) 1.07kg (2.36lbs) TBD
Ingress Protection I
P-67
Mounting
 Pole
Mount
 Wall Mount
 Flat Surface
 Bracket included in the box
Operating Temperature -20ºC
-(4ºF) to
65ºC (149ºF) -40ºC -(-40ºF) to 65ºC (149ºF)
Operating Humidity Up
to 95%, non-condensing
Wind Survivability Up
to 266km/h (165 mph)
Altitude Up
to 3,048m (10,000 ft), functional operation

SOFTWARE AND SERVICES
Location Based Services  SPoT
Network Analytics
 SmartCell Insight (SCI)
 RUCKUS Analytics
Security and Policy  Cloudpath

MODEL FEATURE DIFFERENCES
M
odel A
ntenna Lo
w Temp U
SB DC
Power
T350c Internal omni -20ºC N N
T350d Internal omni -40ºC Y Y
T350se
Internal sector
(120º) + External
antenna capable
-40ºC Y Y

Restricted
RUCKUS T350
Outdoor 802.11ax 2x2:2 Wi-Fi Access Point

OPTIONAL ACCESSORIES
902-0162-XXYY  PoE injector (24W) (Sold in quantities of 1, 10 or 100) 902-0125-0000  Secure articulating mounting bracket
902-0127-0000  Extended cap to accommodate up to 6 cm long USB dongle 902-1121-0000
 Spare weatherizing cable gland with option of one hole or 2 hole connection
902-0183-000
 Spare cable gland for weatherizing the RJ-45 ports on outdoor APs.

See RUCKUS price list for country-specific ordering information. PLEASE NOTE: When ordering outdoor APs, you must specify the destination region by indicating -US, -WW, or -Z2 instead of XX.

For access points, -Z2 applies to the following countries: Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Morocco, Tunisia, and Vietnam.

Warranty: Sold with a limited one year warranty.

For details see: http://support.ruckuswireless.com/warranty PLEASE NOTE: When ordering PoE injectors or power supplies, you must specify the destination region by indicating -US, -EU, -AU, -BR, -CN, -IN, -JP, -KR, -SA, -UK, or -UN instead of -XX.

CommScope pushes the boundaries of communications technology with game-changing ideas and ground-breaking discoveries that spark profound human achievement. We collaborate with our customers and partners to design, create and build the world’s most advanced networks. It is our passion and commitment to identify the next opportunity and realize a better tomorrow. Discover more at commscope.com commscope.com
Visit our website or contact your local CommScope representative for more information. © 2021 CommScope, Inc. All rights reserved.

Unless otherwise noted, all trademarks identified by ® or ™ are registered trademarks, respectively, of CommScope, Inc. This document is for planning purposes only and is not intended to modify or supplement any specifications or warranties relating to CommScope products or services. CommScope is committed to the highest standards of business integrity and environmental sustainability with a number of CommScope's facilities across the globe certified in accordance with international standards, including ISO 9001, TL 9000, and ISO 14001.

Further information regarding CommScope's commitment can be found at www.commscope.com/About-Us/Corporate-Responsibility-and-Sustainability .

ORDERING INFORMATION
T350 OUTDOOR APs
901-T350-XX20
T350c, omni, outdoor access point, 802.11ax 2x2:2 internal BeamFlex+, dual band concurrent. One Ethernet port, PoE input. -20ºC to 65ºC Operating Temperature. Includes mounting
bracket and one year warranty. Does not include PoE injector. 901-T350-XX40
T350d, omni, outdoor access point, 802.11ax 2x2:2 internal BeamFlex+, dual band concurrent. One Ethernet port, PoE input, DC input and USB port. -40ºC to 65ºC Operating Temperature.

Includes mounting bracket and one year warranty. Does not include PoE injector.
901-T350-XX51
T350se, sector+external, outdoor access point, 802.11ax 2x2:2, internal 120 degree sector + external antenna capable, dual band concurrent access point. One Ethernet port, PoE input, DC input and USB port. -40ºC to 65ºC Operating Temperature.

Includes adjustable mounting bracket and one year warranty.

Does not include PoE injector. (Available Q4'21)

Restricted
PA-115633-EN (04/21)

Restricted
T750
Outdoor 802.11ax 4x4:4 Wi-Fi AP with 2.5Gbps Backhaul

DATA SHEET

BENEFITS

GREAT OUTDOOR WI-FI
Experience high performance outdoor
Wi-Fi 6 with IP-67 weather proofing and
dual backhaul options with SFP and multi-
gigabit 2.5 GbE ethernet port.

CONNECT MORE DEVICES

SIMULTANEOUSLY
Improve device performance, by enabling
more simultaneous device connections
with built-in 8 spatial streams (dual-
concurrent, 4x4:4 in 5GHz, 4x4:4 in 2.4GHz),
MU-MIMO and OFDMA technology while
enhancing non-Wi-Fi 6 client performance.

Support for up to 1,024 clients.

HIGH DENSITY PERFORMANCE
Provide exceptional end-user experience
within high density public venues such as
airports, amusement parks, stadiums,
outdoor arenas, and other dense outdoor
urban environments with the Ruckus Ultra-
High-Density Technology Suite.

CONVERGED ACCESS POINT
Allow customers to eliminate siloed
networks and unify Wi-Fi and IoT wireless
technologies into one single network by
using built-in BLE and Zigbee, and also
expand to any future wireless technologies
through the pluggable IoT module.

POWER OTHER DEVICES
Daisy chain and power other devices like an
IP camera, or another AP directly from the
1 GbE PoE output port.

MULTIPLE MANAGEMENT OPTIONS
Manage the T750 with on premise physical/
virtual appliances and control auto-
provisioning for faster deployment and
seamless firmware upgrades.

ENHANCED SECURITY
Reinforce security with WPA3, the latest Wi-
Fi security standard and receive enhanced
protection from man-in-the-middle
attacks.

Outdoor locations such as stadiums, arenas can have the most demanding wireless requirements due to high client density. The T750 access point (AP), based on the latest Wi-Fi 6 standard, brings in multi-gigabit Wi-Fi to support the ever raising expectation for highest quality of service from the users. T750 is IP-67 rated to withstand the rigors of outdoor deployments.

The Ruckus T750 is our high-end dual-band, dual-concurrent Wi-Fi 6 AP that supports eight spatial streams (4x4:4 in 5GHz, 4x4:4 in 2.4GHz). The T750, with OFDMA and MU-MIMO capabilities, efficiently manages up to 1,024 client connections with increased capacity, improved coverage and performance in ultra- high dense environments. Furthermore, the 2.5 GbE ethernet ensures that the backhaul will not be a bottleneck for full use of available Wi-Fi capacity.

The T750 addresses the increasing client demands in public venues such as airports, convention centers, plazas, malls, and other dense urban environments.

It is the perfect choice for data-intensive streaming multimedia applications like 4K video transmissions, while supporting latency sensitive voice and data applications with stringent quality-of-service requirements.

The T750 is also easy to manage through physical, virtual and cloud management options.

The T750 is also designed with a small form factor pluggable (SFP) fiber interface that enable seamless connectivity to a fiber backhaul. The T750 boasts a built-in GPS. Furthermore, 1GbE PoE output port can power a variety of devices like an IP- based camera or even another AP.

In addition, organizations are increasingly leveraging IoT-based sensors to serve their customers better. These sensors run on non-Wi-Fi wireless technologies such as Wi-Fi , BLE or Zigbee. Organizations need a unified platform to eliminate network silos. The Ruckus AP portfolio is equipped to solve these challenges.

The T750 has built-in IoT radios with onboard BLE and Zigbee capabilities. In addition, the T750 is a converged access point that allows customers to seamlessly integrate any new wireless technologies with pluggable IoT module.

The T750 when paired with the Ruckus Ultra-High-Density Technology Suite found only in the Ruckus Wi-Fi portfolio, dramatically improves network performance through a combination of patented wireless innovations and learning algorithms that includes:
• Airtime Decongestion: Increases average network throughput in heavily congested environments
• Transient Client management: Reduces interference traffic from unconnected Wi-Fi devices
• BeamFlex+ Antennas: Extended coverage and optimized throughput with patented multi-directional antennas and radio patterns
Whether you are deploying ten or ten thousand APs, the T750 is also easy to manage through Ruckus’ physical and virtual management options. © 2020 CommScope, Inc. All rights reserved.

© 2020 CommScope, Inc. All rights reserved. 2
Restricted

ACCESS POINT ANTENNA PATTERN
Ruckus’ BeamFlex+ adaptive antennas allow the T750 AP to dynamically choose among a host of antenna patterns (over 4,000 possible combinations) in real-time to establish the best possible connection with every device. This leads to:
• Better Wi-Fi coverage
• Reduced RF interference
Traditional omni-directional antennas, found in generic access points, oversaturate the environment by needlessly radiating RF signals in all directions.

In contrast, the Ruckus BeamFlex+ adaptive antenna directs the radio signals per- device on a packet by-packet basis to optimize Wi-Fi coverage and capacity in real- time to support high device density environments. BeamFlex+ operates without the need for device feedback and hence can benefit even devices using legacy standards.

Figure 1. Example of BeamFlex+ pattern
Figure 2. T750 2.4GHz Azimuth
Antenna Patterns
Figure 3. T750 5GHz Azimuth
Antenna Patterns
Figure 4. T750 2.4GHz Elevation
Antenna Patterns
Figure 5. T750 5GHz Elevation
Antenna Patterns
Note: The outer trace represents the composite RF footprint of all possible BeamFlex+ antenna patterns, while the inner trace represents one BeamFlex+ antenna pattern within the composite outer trace.

T750
Outdoor 802.11ax 4x4:4 Wi-Fi AP with 2.5Gbps Backhaul DATA SHEET

T750
Outdoor 802.11ax 4x4:4 Wi-Fi AP with 2.5Gbps Backhaul DATA SHEET © 2020 CommScope, Inc. All rights reserved. 3
Restricted
5GHZ RECEIVE SENSITIVITY (dBm)
VHT20 VHT40 VHT80
MCS0 MCS7 MCS8 MCS9 MCS0 MCS7 MCS8 MCS9 MCS0 MCS7 MCS8 MCS9 -98 -80 -77 - -95 -77 - -72 -92 -74 - -69
HE20 HE40 HE80
MCS0 MCS7 MCS9 MCS11MCS0 MCS7 MCS9 MCS11MCS0 MCS7 MCS9 MCS11 -98 -80 -75 -70 -95 -77 -72 -67 -92 -74 -69 -64
WI-FI
Wi-Fi Standards • IEEE 802/11a/b/g/n/ac/ax
Supported Rates
• 802.11ax: 4 to 2400 Mbps
• 802.11ac: 6.5 to 1732 Mbps
• 802.11n: 6.5 to 600 Mbps
• 802.11a/g: 6 to 54 Mbps
• 802.11b: 1 to 11 Mbps
Supported Channels • 2.4GHz: 1-13
• 5GHz: 36-64, 100-144, 149-165
M
IMO • 4x4 SU-MIMO
• 4x4 MU-MIMO
Spatial Streams • 4 for both SU-MIMO & MU-MIMO
Radio Chains and
Streams • 4x4:4
C
hannelization • 20, 40, 80, 160MHz
S
ecurity
• WPA-PSK, WPA-TKIP, WPA2 AES, WPA3, 802.11i,
Dynamic PSK, OWE
• WIPS/WIDS
Other Wi-Fi Features
• WMM, Power Save, Tx Beamforming, LDPC, STBC,
802.11r/k/v
• Hotspot
• Hotspot 2.0
• Captive Portal
• WISPr

2.4GHZ TX POWER TARGET (PER CHAIN)
Rate Pout (dBm)
MCS0, HT20 20
MCS7, HT20 19.5
MCS8, VHT20 19
MCS9, VHT40 18.5
MCS11, HE40 17
5GHZ TX POWER TARGET (PER CHAIN)
Rate Pout (dBm)
MCS0, VHT20 22
MCS7, VHT40, VHT80 20
MCS9, VHT40, VHT80 18.5
MCS11, HE20, HE40,
HE80 17

PERFORMANCE AND CAPACITY
Peak PHY Rates • 2.4 GHz: 1148 Mbps
• 5 GHz: 2400 Mbps
Client Capacity • Up to 1024 clients per AP

RUCKUS RADIO MANAGEMENT
Antenna Optimization
• BeamFlex+
• Polarization Diversity with Maximal Ratio
Combining (PD-MRC)
Wi-Fi Channel
Management
• ChannelFly
• Background Scan Based
Client Density
Management
• Adaptive Band Balancing
• Client Load Balancing
• Airtime Fairness
• Airtime-based WLAN Prioritization
SmartCast Quality of
Service
• QoS-based scheduling
• Directed Multicast
• L2/L3/L4 ACLs
Mobility • SmartRoam
Diagnostic tools • Spectrum Analysis
• SpeedFlex
RF
Antenna Type
• BeamFlex+ adaptive antennas with polarization
diversity
• Adaptive antenna that provides 4,000+ unique
antenna patterns per band
Antenna Gain (max) • Up to 3dBi
Peak Transmit Power
(Tx port/chain +
Combining gain)
• 2.4GHz: 26dBm
• 5GHz: 28dBm
Frequency Bands
• ISM (2.4-2.484GHz)
• U-NII-1 (5.15-5.25GHz)
• U-NII-2A (5.25-5.35GHz)
• U-NII-2C (5.47-5.725GHz)
• U-NII-3 (5.725-5.85GHz)

2.4GHZ RECEIVE SENSITIVITY (dBm)
HT20 HT40 VHT20 VHT40
MCS0 MCS7 MCS0 MCS7 MCS0 MCS7 MCS0 MCS7
-9
8 -7
9 -95 -76 -98 -79 -95 -76
HE20 HE40
MCS0 MCS7 MCS9 MCS11 MCS0 MCS7 MCS9 MCS11
-9
8 -7
9 -76 -70 -95 -76 -73 -67

© 2020 CommScope, Inc. All rights reserved. 4
T750
Outdoor 802.11ax 4x4:4 Wi-Fi AP with 2.5Gbps Backhaul DATA SHEET Restricted

NETWORKING
Controller Platform
Support
• SmartZone
• ZoneDirector
• Unleashed*
• Standalone
Mesh • SmartMesh™ wireless meshing technology.

Selfhealing Mesh
IP • IPv4, IPv6, dual-stack
VLAN
• 802.1Q (1 per BSSID or dynamic per user based on

RADIUS)
• VLAN Pooling
• Port-based
802.1x • Authenticator & Supplicant
Tunnel • L2TP, GRE, Soft-GRE
Policy Management
Tools
• Application Recognition and Control
• Access Control Lists
• Device Fingerprinting
• Rate Limiting
IoT Capable • Yes
*Refer to Unleashed datasheets for SKU ordering information.

OTHER RADIO TECHNOLOGIES
GPS • Types GLONAS...etc

PHYSICAL INTERFACES
Ethernet • 1x 2.g Gbps, 1 x 10/100/1000 Mbps ports, RJ-45 • LACP
Fiber • SFP, 1Gbps, SFP+ 10 Gbps
USB • 1 USB 2.0 port, Type A (On Omni SKU only)
Certifications and Compliance
Wi-Fi Alliance* • Wi-Fi CERTIFIED™ a, b, g, n, ac, ax (Wi-Fi 6) • Passpoint®, Vantage
• EN 60950-1 Safety
• EN 60601-1-2 Medical
• EN 61000-4-2/3/5 Immunity
Standards
Compliance**
• EN 50121-1 Railway EMC
• EN 50121-4 Railway Immunity
• IEC 61373 Railway Shock & Vibration
• EN 62311 Human Safety/RF Exposure
• WEEE & RoHS
• ISTA 2A Transportation
*For complete list of WFA certifications, please see the Wi-Fi Alliance website. **For current certification status, please see the price list.

Software and Services
Location based services • SPoT
Network Analytics • SmartCell Insight (SCI)
Security and Policy • Cloudpath
POWER
Mode Power
Consumption System Configuration
AC Power

64.6W (SFP+
Backhaul)

63.7W (Ethernet
Backhaul)
• Full Functionality
• 2nd Ethernet Port enabled
• PSE Out (26W) Available
• Onboard IoT enabled
• USB Enabled (3W)
802.3bt Class 7
(Maximum
Functionality With PSE
Out)
57W
• Full Functionality
• 2nd Ethernet Port enabled
• PSE Out (26W) Available
• Onboard IoT enabled
• USB Enabled (3W)
802.3bt Class
75(Maximum
Functionality With PSE
Out)
31W
• Full Functionality
• 2nd Ethernet Port enabled
• PSE Out Disabled
• Onboard IoT enabled
802.3at (Reduced
Functionality Without
USB)

24.2W
• Full Functionality
• 2nd Ethernet Port enabled
• PSE Out Disabled
• Onboard IoT enabled
• USB Disabled
I
dle 1

0.75W
• 2nd Ethernet Port enabled
• PSE Out Disabled
• Onboard IoT disabled
• •USB Disabled

PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
Physical Size • 34.64cm (L), 24.06cm (W), 10.17cm (H)
• 13.64in (L) x 9.47in (W) x 4.0in (H)
W
eight • 2.84kg
• 6.27lbs
M
ounting • Pole Mount
Operating Temperature • -40°C (-40°F) to 65°C (145°F)
Operating Humidity • Up to 95%, non-condensing
W
ind Survivabiity • Up to 266km/h (165mph)

© 2020 CommScope, Inc. All rights reserved. 5
T750
Outdoor 802.11ax 4x4:4 Wi-Fi AP with 2.5Gbps Backhaul DATA SHEET Restricted

ORDERING INFORMATION
901-T750-XX01
• Ruckus T750 802.11ax Outdoor Wireless Access
Point, 4x4:4 Stream, Omnidirectional Beamflex+
coverage, 2.4GHz and 5GHz concurrent dual band,
(1x) 2.5G Ethernet port, (1x) 10/100/1000 Ethernet
port, 100-240 Vac, POE in and PSE out, Fiber SFP/SFP
+, GPS, IP-67 Outdoor enclosure, -40 to 65C
Operating Temperature.
• For box contents, see Shipping Container Contents.
901-T750-XX51
• Ruckus T750S 802.11ax Outdoor Wireless Access
Point, 4x4:4 Stream, 120-Degree Sector antenna
included and option to attach external antennae,

2.4GHz and 5GHz concurrent dual band, (1x) 2.5G
Ethernet port, (1x) 10/100/1000 Ethernet ports,
100-240 Vac, POE in and PSE out, Fiber SFP/SFP+,
GPS, IP-67 Outdoor enclosure, -40 to 65C Operating
Temperature.
• For box contents, see Shipping Container Contents.

See Ruckus price list for country-specific ordering information.

Warranty: Sold with a limited 1-year warranty.

For details see: http://support.ruckuswireless.com/warranty.

T750
Outdoor 802.11ax 4x4:4 Wi-Fi AP with 2.5Gbps Backhaul DATA SHEET Restricted

OPTIONAL ACCESSORIES
10G-SFPP-USR-SA • 10GE USR SFP+ OPTIC (LC),RANGE 100M
MMF,Standard Temperature, TAA Compliant,1-Pack
10G-SFPP-USR-SA8 • 10GE USR SFP+ OPTIC (LC),RANGE 100M
MMF,Standard Temperature, TAA Compliant,8-Pack
PLEASE NOTE: When ordering Indoor APs, you must specify the destination region by indicating -US, -WW, or -Z2 instead of XX. When ordering PoE injectors or power supplies, you must specify the destination region by indicating -US, -EU, -AU, -BR, -CN, -IN, -JP, -KR, -SA, -UK, or -UN instead of -XX.

For access points, -Z2 applies to the following countries: Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Morocco, Tunisia, and Vietnam.
© 2020 CommScope, Inc. All rights reserved.

ARRIS, the ARRIS logo and CommScope are trademarks of CommScope, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. PA-113866.2-EN (20-01-B) www.ruckusnetworks.com | 350 West Java Dr., Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA

OPTIONAL ACCESSORIES
902-0180-XX00 • PoE Injector (60W)
902-1170-XX00 • Power Supply (48V, 0.75A, 36W)
902-0120-0000 • Spare, Accessory Mounting Bracket
902-0195-0000 • Spare, T-bar ceiling mount kit for mounting to flush frame ceiling
E1MG-BXD
• 1000BASE-BXD SFP optic SMF, transmits at 1490nm
and receives at 1310nm, LC connector, single strand
SMF fiber. This optic should only be connected to
an E1MG-BXU at the far end.

E1MG-BXU
• 1000BASE-BXU SFP optic SMF, transmits at 1310nm
and receives at 1490nm, LC connector, single strand
SMF fiber. This optic should only be connected to
an E1MG-BXD at the far end
E1MG-LHA-OM • 1000BASE-LHA SFP optic, SMF, LC connector, optical monitoring capable
E1MG-LHA-OM-T
• 1000BASE-LHA SFP optic, SMF, LC connector, optical
monitoring capable, industrial temperature (-40°C
to 85°C)
E1MG-LX-OM • 1000Base-LX SFP optic, SMF, LC connector, Optical Monitoring Capable
E1MG-LX-OM-8 • 1000BASE-LX SFP optic, SMF, LC connector, optical monitoring capable, 8-pack
E1MG-LX-OM-T • 1000Base-LX SFP optic, SMF, LC connector, Optical Monitoring Capable, Industrial Temperature
E1MG-SX-OM • 1000Base-SX SFP optic, MMF, LC connector, Optical Monitoring Capable
E1MG-SX-OM-8 • 1000BASE-SX SFP optic MMF, LC connector, optical monitoring capable, 8-pack
E1MG-SX-OM-T • 1000Base-SX SFP optic, MMF, LC connector, Optical Monitoring Capable, Industrial Temperature
E1MG-LX-A • 1000BASE-LX SFP Optic, SMF, LC connector, Optical Monitoring Capable, TAA compliant
E1MG-LX-A8 • 1000BASE-LX SFP Optic, SMF, LC connector, Optical Monitoring Capable, TAA compliant, 8-pack
E1MG-SX-A • 1000BASE-SX SFP Optic, MMF, (LC), Optical
Monitoring Capable, TAA compliant
E1MG-SX-A8 • 1000BASE-SX SFP Optic, MMF, (LC), Optical
Monitoring Capable, TAA compliant, 8-pack
10G-SFPP-SR-SA
• 10GBASE-SR, SFP+ optic (LC), target range 300m
over MMF, standard temperature (0°C to 70°C),TAA
compliant
10G-SFPP-SR-SA8
• 10GBASE-SR, SFP+ optic (LC), target range 300m
over MMF, standard temperature (0°C to 70°C),TAA
compliant, 8 pack
10G-SFPP-SR-S • 10GBASE-SR,SFPP MMF LC CONNECTOR (No TAA) 10G-SFPP-SR-S8 • 10GBASE-SR,SFPP MMF LC CONNECTOR 8-PACK (No TAA)
10G-SFPP-LR-SA
• 10GBASE-LR, SFP+ optic (LC), for up to 10km over
SMF, standard temperature (0°C to 70°C), TAA
compliant
10G-SFPP-LR-SA8
• 10GBASE-LR, SFP+ optic (LC), for up to 10km over
SMF, -standard temperature (0°C to 70°C), TAA
compliant, - 8 pack
10G-SFPP-LR-S • 10GBASE-LR,SFPP SMF LC CONNECTOR (No TAA) 10G-SFPP-LR-S8 • 10GBASE-LR,SFPP SMF LC CONNECTOR 8-PACK (No TAA)

EtherHaul™-8010FX
Datasheet
Restricted
10Gbps 70/80GHz Radio – Wireless Fiber Connectivity
The EH-8010FX delivers 10Gbps Full Duplex throughput for high capacity networks in Metro, Aggregation and Trunking applications.
10Gbps Over Long Distance
The EH-8010FX radio delivers 10Gbps full duplex point-to-point wireless Ethernet connectivity with the longest mmWave reach by means of the highest system gain in the market. Incorporating dozens of Siklu innovations, the EH-8010FX is based on the same platform that has been deployed in tens of thousands of links from the EtherHaul family
Carrier Grade Features
High throughput and low latency combine to deliver fiber compatible performance. The EH-8010FX incorporates QoS- aware adaptive bandwidth coding and modulation for high availability and easy integration with Ethernet switches or MPLS routers in highly resilient topologies.

The EH-8010FX is designed to connect into existing networks with its support for both copper and fiber 10G interfaces allowing service providers and enterprises to extend their copper or fiber networks.

Small Size, Easy to Deploy & Manage
The all-outdoor radio has a small footprint and is light weight which makes site acquisition a breeze. The product comes pre- configured out of the box with no license to download greatly simplifying the time and cost for installation. The intuitive web GUI manages local and remote units to enable fast
commissioning and configuration.

Exceptional Value
With its IP67 construction, the EH-8010FX is extremely rugged and designed to last for years in the harshest conditions at a price that yields quick Return-On-Investment (ROI) and minimizes Total Cost of Ownership (TCO). The advanced
10Gbps system delivers an unbeatable price per Gb. Its small and light form factor lowers installation costs, increases reliability and reduces site visits.

Massive Spectrum Availability, and High Reuse
The EH-8010FX operates over the interference-free 71-76/81- 86GHz E-band spectrum, with a total of 10GHz of bandwidth for use worldwide. By using a high-gain pencil-beam antenna, this helps guarantee spectrum will be available everywhere and maximizes spectrum re-use. Additionally, E-band systems are governed by low licensing fees and a quick licensing processes.

Applications for a Wide Range of
Vertical Markets
Fiber Network Extension/ Backup
Enterprise Multi Gigabit-Connectivity
Metro and Aggregation Networks
Multi-Dwelling Unit Gigabit Broadband
Mobile Backhaul
Twitter Linkdin
© Copyright 2018 Siklu Communication Ltd. All Rights Reserved. [email protected] | www.siklu.com

EtherHaul™-8010FX
Specifications
Restricted
Frequency / Duplexing 71-76GHz / 81-86GHz, FDD
Channel Bandwidth,
Modulation & Adaptive Rate
500/1,250/2,000MHz
Adaptive bandwidth, coding and modulation - boost gain over 20dB Throughput 10,000Mbps full duplex
Tx Power BPSK: +18dBm
QAM128: +14dBm
Receive Signal Level (RSL) RSL @ BPSK = -75dBm
RSL @ QAM128 = -50dBm
Reach 1.7/2.3 mile @ 99.95% availability (rain zone K/E, 2ft ANT.) Interfaces 1 combo 10GE port: 802.3bz (RJ-45, copper) or SFP+ (MMF or SMF) 1GE port: 802.3ab (RJ-45, copper)
Power Supply PoE+ or 36÷57VDC; 50W
Management & Provisioning
In / Out-of-band management
Web GUI or CLI
SNMPv2/3, TACACS+, RADIUS
Zero-touch turn-up
L2, Traffic Management Transparent Bridge, VLAN encapsulation QOS Aware Traffic Management
Security AES (factory option)
Timing Synchronous Ethernet and 1588v2 TC (factory option) Conformance
Radio: USA FCC Part 15.101 & ETSI EN 302 217; EMC: USA FCC 47CFR.part 15 & ETSI EN 301 489; Safety UL/EN 60950
Environmental Operating Temperature: -45° to +55°C (-49° to +131°F) Ingress Protection Rating: IP67
Dimensions
ODU + 0.5ft antenna: 9.17” x 8.11” x 5.55” (23.3cm x 20.6cm x 14.1cm) ODU + 1ft antenna (Dia. x Depth): 12.6” x 4.3” (32cm x 13cm) ODU + 2ft antenna (Dia. x Depth): 25.6” x 15.35” (65cm x 37cm) Weight
ODU + 0.5ft antenna: 9.2lbs. (4.1kg)
ODU + 1ft. antenna: 9.9lbs. (4.4kg)
ODU + 2ft. antenna: 24.3lbs (10.9kg)
© Copyright 2018 Siklu Communication Ltd. All Rights Reserved. [email protected] | www.siklu.com Twitter Linkdin Rev.A1

Restricted
MULTIHAUL™ TG NODE N367
Enhanced 360-degree coverage in one unit for Terragraph deployments The MultiHaul™ TG system marks the release of Siklu’s 3rd generation point to multipoint 60GHz products, with Terragraph certification. The solution consists of Nodes operating over millimetre waves in a redundant mesh topology which connect a suite of Terminal Units (TU). The MultiHaul TG family of products brings the advantages of mmWave spectrum – multi-gigabit capacity, immunity to interference and massive amounts of available spectrum - to an easy to deploy solution with the addition of L2 SDN mesh, enabled by Siklu’s SmartHaul™ NMS with the Runner subsystem, for stress-free coverage extension and multi-path reliability. MultiHaul TG Node, N367, is the ideal solution for scalable deployments across neighbourhoods and business environments.

Enhanced RF2 antennas, High Capacity and Flexibility
for Dense Deployments
The MultiHaul TG Nodes operate with 4 independent
sectors over the millimetre wave spectrum using narrow
beams. This confers several advantages including multi- gigabit capacity in dense deployments. With 4 independent high-gain beam-forming RF2 antennas, a multitude of
network topologies can be realized to optimize coverage, capacity, and performance. The industry unique RF2
antennas deliver a superior link budget, enhancing the
service capacity and availability across a 60% to 80% larger service area, compared to non RF2 antennas.

A Wide Range of Applications
 Fixed 5G Wireless Access, Gigabit to the Home, the
MDU and the Enterprise
 Wi-Fi Hotspot Backhaul
 Security / Safe City Networks
 Smart City Business Services, Municipal networks
 Small Cell Backhaul
Always-On Mission Critical Networks
When you can’t afford to lose a video stream, critical safe city sensor data or any other mission critical data, you need a wireless network that’s as reliable and secure as fiber.

With maximal immunity to interference and hacker-proof
links with embedded AES encryption, MultiHaul™ TG
delivers a network you can count on. An additional layer of reliability is available through the L2 self-organizing (SON) capabilities enabled by SmartHaul NMS with Runner,
enabling automatic reorganization and rerouting around
site failures.

Simple Integrated Future-safe Multi-Functional Node
Wireless infrastructure should be simple, and future proof.

Organizations want to quickly deploy a single box across the target neighbourhood, knowing that this infrastructure will address the needs of self-backhaul, distribution, local services, redundancy, SLA enforcement, with enough
horsepower to scale the bandwidth and accommodate new
features over the foreseeable future, achieving a long and useful lifetime.

Fiber Quality with Wireless Flexibility
Siklu’s millimetre wave radios successfully combine the capacity of fiber with the flexibility, speed of deployment and low TCO of wireless networks. That is what makes
them the world’s best-selling millimetre wave radios every year since 2011. They provide rock solid performance, even in very dense networks or under severe weather
conditions, in thousands of networks around the globe.

Highly Secure and Physically Immune Beams
The narrow beamwidth confers several advantages
including immunity to interference and network jamming.

In contrast to wide-beam wireless systems that need to use multiple strategies to perform in dense areas. Multiple subscribers and services can be connected with complete isolation based on physical port, VLAN ID and/or a Terminal Unit.

Ready Set Go
The plug and play integrated node is designed for an easy single person installation. The patent-pending scanning antennas automatically aligns with other Nodes or with
TUs. For buildings with difficult roof-top access, a single Node is installed on its roof to serve multiple locations.

Restricted
MULTIHAUL™ TG NODE - N367
60GHz 4x RF2-sectors wireless L2 SDN mesh Node Specifications The main specifications of the MultiHaul™ TG N367 are outlined in the following table.

Topologies Point to Point, Point to Multi-point, Self-Backhaul L2 SDN Mesh.

Frequency & Duplexing 57-66GHz, TDD/TDMA. 4 channels.

Channel Bandwidth,
Modulation & Adaptive
Coding, TPC
2160MHz, BPSK to QAM16, up to 10 levels of hitless adaptive bandwidth, coding and modulation – boost gain by over 29dB.

Automatic Transmit Power Control (ATPC), per link.

Radio OTA Rate (over the
air) / Throughput
OTA up to 4,600 Mbps per sector,
Throughput > 3,800 Mbps per sector (> 16Gbps per node)
System Gain (link budget) RF2 enabled, up to 128.5dB (Node to TU, including RF2 antenna gain). Please refer to Siklu SmartHaul™ Link Budget Calculator (lbc.siklu.com) for radio link performance models.

Sector(s) 4x 90° sector, for 360° coverage, any sector on any channel.

Horizontal scanning: 90° per sector,
Vertical scanning: 25°.

Network synchronization On-board GPS
Interfaces 3 ports: 1x RJ-45 10/5/2.5/1GbE with PoE-In, 1x RJ-45 1GbE with PoE-Out (65W), 1x SFP+ 10GbE.

Ethernet Features IEEE 802.1d transparent bridging, IEEE 802.1q Virtual LAN, IEEE 802.1ad Provider bridge VLAN stacking.

Security AES 128-bits OTA, GUI over HTTPS, CLI over SSH.

Management &
Provisioning
In-band, Out-of-band management,
Web GUI (one-pane configuration of local and remote units) & Embedded CLI, NETCONF, SNMP.

PoE-Out 1 port, 45W POE-Out (IEEE 802.3bt; * cable loss may affect power delivered to the PD).

Power Supply PoE-In (IEEE 802.3bt or passive), or 48V DC (via RJ-45 adaptor) 45W no POE-Out, 90W with 45W POE-Out.

Conformance Radio: US FCC 47 CFR Part 15.255; EN 303 722; UK IR 2030 EMC: US FCC 47 CFR Part 15; EN 301 489,
Safety: UL/IEC 62368-1; UL/IEC 60950-22.

Terragraph Terragraph certified.

Environmental Operating Temperature: -49° ÷ +131°F (-45° ÷ +55°C); Ingress Protection Rating: IP67.

Dimensions 7.7 x 9.5 x 7.2 in. / 195 x 242 x 184 mm (width x height x depth) Weight 7.9 lbs. / 3.6 Kg.

In the Box N367, mounting kit and metallic bands, All Weather Shells, grounding cable, quick start guide (QSG).

Rev A5

Restricted
MULTIHAUL™ TG TERMINAL UNIT T265
Service Options in Terragraph deployments
The MultiHaul™ TG system marks the release of Siklu’s 3rd generation point to multipoint 60GHz products, this one with Terragraph certification. The TG network solution consists of Nodes operating over millimeter waves in a redundant mesh topology which also connect to Terminal Units (TU). The T265 communicates to the N366 TG Distribution node using the TG protocol, acting as an end point in a fully meshed MH TG topology. The T265 is Siklu’s first TG TU and incorporates several features from our standard MH TU. The T265 offers up to 3 ports with both copper and fiber interfaces as well as a PoE out port to power third party devices such as video cameras. The MH-T260 is available for single port applications.

A Wide Range of Applications
 Fixed 5G Wireless Access, Gigabit to the Home, the
MDU and the Enterprise
 Wi-Fi Hotspot Backhaul
 Security / Safe City Networks
 Smart City Business Services, Municipal networks
 Small Cell Backhaul
 Fiber hand-off
Capacity and Flexibility for Demanding Applications
The MultiHaul™ TG Terminal Units operate over the
millimeter wave spectrum using self-aligned, dynamic beam steering RF. This confers several advantages including
multi-gigabit capacity in dense deployments. With 3 ports, RJ-45 up to 2.5GE or fiber up to 10Gbps, a multitude of service deliveries and interfaces can be realized to meet the need of any demanding application.

Always-On Mission Critical Networks
When you can’t afford to lose a video stream, critical safe city sensor data or any other mission critical data, you need a wireless network that’s as reliable and secure as fiber.

With maximal immunity to interference and hacker-proof
links with embedded AES encryption, MultiHaul™ TG
delivers a network you can count on. With the mesh
topology there are built in redundant paths for traffic if an outage occurs in a given link.

Simple Integrated Future-safe Terminal Unit
Wireless infrastructure should be simple, and future proof.

Organizations want to quickly deploy a single box across the target neighborhood, knowing that they have options to
meet the interface requirements of any application. With a built-in software configured ethernet switch, PoE out up to 63W for collocated CPEs, cameras or other devices, plus fiber termination, the T265 Unit can address all your
applications.

Fiber Quality with Wireless Flexibility
Siklu’s millimeter wave radios successfully combine the capacity of fiber with the flexibility, speed of deployment and low TCO of wireless networks. That is what makes
them the world’s best-selling millimeter wave radios every year since 2011. They provide rock solid performance, even in very dense networks or under severe weather
conditions, in thousands of networks around the globe.

Highly Secure and Physically Immune Beams
The narrow beamwidth confers several advantages
including immunity to interference and network jamming.

In contrast to wide-beam wireless systems that need to use multiple strategies to perform in dense areas. Multiple subscribers and services can be connected with complete isolation based on physical port, VLAN ID and/or a Terminal Unit.

Ready Set Go
The plug and play TU is designed for an easy single person installation. The patent-pending scanning antennas
automatically aligns with serving Node(s).

Restricted
MULTIHAUL™ TG TERMINAL UNIT T265
60GHz Terminal Unit Radio – specifications
The main specifications of the MultiHaul™ TG T265 model are outlined in the following table.

Topologies Point to Multi-point.

Frequency & Duplexing 57-66GHz, TDD/TDMA. 4 channels.

Channel Bandwidth,
Modulation & Coding, TPC
2160MHz, BPSK to QAM16, up to 10 levels of hitless adaptive coding and modulation – boost gain by over 29dB.

Automatic Transmit Power Control (ATPC), per link.

Radio OTA Rate (over the
air) / Throughput
OTA up to 4,600Mbps (future release 9,200Mbps with channel bonding) / Throughput up to 3800 Mbps aggregate (future release up to 5,500 Mbps aggregate).

System Gain (link budget) 110dB (Node to TU, including antenna gain). Please refer to Siklu SmartHaul™ Link Budget Calculator (lbc.siklu.com) for radio link performance models.

Self-alignment scanning Horizontal scanning: 90°,
Vertical scanning: 50°.

Network synchronization To N366
Interfaces
1x RJ-45 2.5/1GbE with PoE-In
1x RJ-45 1GbE with PoE-Out (81W)
1x SFP+ 10GbE.

Ethernet Features IEEE 802.1d transparent bridging,
Provider bridge - VLAN & VLAN stacking.

Security AES 128-bits OTA, GUI over HTTPS, CLI over SSH, file transfer over SSH. IP-less operations.

Management & Provisioning
In-band, Out-of-band management,
Web GUI (one-pane configuration of local and remote units) & Embedded CLI, NETCONF, SNMP.

PoE-Out 1 port, 81W POE-Out (IEEE 802.3bt; * cable loss may affect power delivered to the PD).

Conformance
Radio: US FCC 47 CFR Part 15.255; EN 303 722,
EMC: US FCC 47 CFR Part 15; EN 301 489,
Safety: UL/IEC 62368-1; UL/IEC 60950-22.

Terragraph Terragraph certified.

Power Supply PoE-In (IEEE 802.3bt or passive), or 48V DC (via RJ-45 adaptor), 19W no POE-Out, up to 90W with up to 81W POE-Out.

Environmental Operating Temperature: -49° ÷ +131°F (-45° ÷ +55°C); Ingress Protection Rating: IP67.

Dimensions 6.9 x 8.6 x 4.9 in. / 175 x 220 x 125 mm. (W x H x D).

Weight 4.84 lbs. / 2.2 Kg.

In the Box Terminal unit with attached mounting kit, metallic bands, all weather shell, indoor 60W PoE power supply with AC cable, quick start guide.

Rev H2

Restricted
MULTIHAUL™ TG LR TERMINAL UNIT T280
Long Range Options in Terragraph deployments
The MultiHaul™ TG system marks the release of Siklu’s 3rd generation point to multipoint 60GHz products, this one with Terragraph certification. The TG network solution consists of Nodes operating over millimeter waves in a redundant mesh topology which also connect to Terminal Units (TU). The T280 is Siklu’s long range TG TU, compatible with the N366 in PtMP mode for additional distances to served locations. The T280 can also operate in PtP mode, 2 identical units on each site, for even longer distances. The T280 offers up to 3 ports with both copper and fiber interfaces as well as a PoE out to power a collocated N366 or any other 3rd party device.

A Wide Range of Applications
 Fixed 5G Wireless Access, Gigabit to the Home, the
MDU and the Enterprise
 Wi-Fi Hotspot Backhaul
 Security / Safe City Networks
 Smart City Business Services, Municipal networks
 Small Cell Backhaul
 Fiber hand-off
Long Distance and High Capacity
The Long Range T280 provides deployment options like no other 60GHz radios, with the inherent capacity of the
Terragraph links. A choice of 0.5ft, 1ft or 2ft antenna allows choosing the perfect solution for the most challenging long- distance links, while allowing installation on roof tops, or on street furniture with its compact streamlined reflector antenna.

Flexibility for Demanding Applications
The MultiHaul™ TG LR Terminal Units operate over the
millimeter wave spectrum, with a range of reflector
antennas. This confers several advantages including multi- gigabit capacity in dense deployments. With 3 ports, RJ-45 up to 5GE or fiber up to 10Gbps, a multitude of service deliveries and interfaces can be realized to meet the need of any demanding application.

Always-On Mission Critical Networks
When you can’t afford to lose a video stream, critical safe city sensor data or any other mission critical data, you need a wireless network that’s as reliable and secure as fiber.

With maximal immunity to interference and hacker-proof
links with embedded AES encryption, MultiHaul™ TG
delivers a network you can count on. With the mesh
topology there are built in redundant paths for traffic if an outage occurs in a given link.

Simple Integrated Future-safe Terminal Unit
Wireless infrastructure should be simple, and future proof.

Organizations want to quickly deploy a single box across the target neighborhood, knowing that they have options to
meet the interface requirements of any application. With a built-in software configured ethernet switch, PoE out up to 63W for collocated CPEs, cameras or other devices, plus fiber termination, the T280 Unit can address all your
applications.

Fiber Quality with Wireless Flexibility
Siklu’s millimeter wave radios successfully combine the capacity of fiber with the flexibility, speed of deployment and low TCO of wireless networks. That is what makes
them the world’s best-selling millimeter wave radios every year since 2011. They provide rock solid performance, even in very dense networks or under severe weather
conditions, in thousands of networks around the globe.

Highly Secure and Physically Immune Beams
The narrow beamwidth confers several advantages
including immunity to interference and network jamming.

In contrast to wide-beam wireless systems that need to use multiple strategies to perform in dense areas. Multiple subscribers and services can be connected with complete isolation based on physical port, VLAN ID and/or a Terminal Unit (in PtMP mode).

Ready Set Go
With auto-connect no laptop or mobile device needed, the T280 allows plug and play deployment in a very short time.

It fits right into the PtMP management model of the serving N366 in PtMP mode, or operates with a single pane of glass in PtP mode, both units on the same screen.

Restricted
MULTIHAUL™ TG LONG REACH TERMINAL UNIT T280
60GHz Long Range Terminal Unit Radio - specifications
The main specifications of the MultiHaul™ TG Long Range Units are outlined in the following table.

Topologies Point to Point, Point to Multi-point, Daisy-chain, L2 SDN Mesh Frequency & Duplexing 57-66GHz, TDD/TDMA, 4 channels.

Channel Bandwidth,
Modulation & Adaptive
Coding, TPC
2160MHz, BPSK to QAM16, up to 10 levels of hitless adaptive bandwidth, coding and modulation – boost gain by over 29dB.

Automatic Transmit Power Control (ATPC), per link.

Radio OTA Rate (over the
air) / Throughput
OTA up to 4,600Mbps (future SW release 9,200Mbps with channel bonding) / Throughput up to 3800 Mbps aggregate (future SW release up to 5,500 Mbps aggregate).

Antenna Options 0.5ft – 36dBi or 1ft – 42dBi, field installable / replaceable (FRU). Effective distances, capacity and availability can be calculated with Siklu Link Budget Calculator lbc.siklu.com Transmit power Up to +13dBm at the antenna port (note: transmit power is backed off above MCS9) Interfaces (3 ports)
1x RJ-45 5G/2.5/1GbE with PoE-In,
1x RJ-45 1GbE with PoE-Out (up to 81W),
1x SFP+ 10GbE.

Ethernet Features IEEE 802.1d transparent bridging, VLAN tagging and isolation, Provider bridge - VLAN stacking.

Security AES 128-bits OTA, GUI over HTTPS, CLI over SSH, file transfer over SSH. IP-less operations.

Out of the Box Factory configuration PtMP mode (N36x <> T280), Field configuration to PtP mode (T280 <> T280).

Management & Provisioning
In-band, Out-of-band management,
Web GUI (one-pane configuration of local and remote units) & Embedded CLI, NETCONF, SNMP.

PoE-Out 1 port, 81W POE-Out (IEEE 802.3bt; * cable loss may affect power delivered to the PD).

Conformance
Radio: US FCC 47 CFR Part 15.255; EN 303 722,
EMC: US FCC 47 CFR Part 15; EN 301 489,
Safety: UL/IEC 62368-1; UL/IEC 60950-22.

Terragraph Terragraph certified.

Power Supply PoE-In (IEEE 802.3bt or passive), or 48V DC (via RJ-45 adaptor), 19W no POE-Out, up to 90W with up to 81W POE-Out.

Environmental Operating Temperature: -49° ÷ +131°F (-45° ÷ +55°C); Ingress Protection Rating: IP67.

Dimensions 6.9 x 9 x 2.5 in. / 175 x 230 x 65 mm. (W x H x D), antenna not included.

Weight 4.4 lbs. / 2 Kg, antenna not included.

In the box Terminal unit, all weather shell, grounding cable, quick start guide.

Accessories External Antenna, Mounting Kit, Power Supply – not included.

Optional accessories, not included: surge protector, SFP/SFP+.

Rev.F3

Restricted
Gigabit &
Fiber Ports
All-In-One-Box Outdoor PoE Switch Solutions for
Wired/Wireless, IP Video, & Smart City Applications
LinkPower™ LPS3400ATMP-300-T1
Outdoor Layer 2+ Managed Gigabit PoE
Network Switch with Gigabit Fiber Uplink

APPLICATIONS
• Smart City
• Video Security Surveillances
• Campus Networks
• Wireless Service Networks
• Border Security Surveillance
• Municipal Networks
Ethernet
Surge
Protection
IP68
All Weather
-30ºC to 70ºC
• Hospitality Networks
• Hotel Resort Networks
• Hotspot Integrations
• VOIP Services
• Traffic Monitoring
The LinkPower™ LPS3400ATMP-300-T1 Layer 2+ 6-Port Managed Outdoor PoE (Power over Ethernet) IEEE802.3bt Switch offers 4-Port Gigabit PoE with 2 SFP Uplink Port
Network Switch with dual power input redundancy with 120V~240AC and/ or 48V DC. This is the industry first outdoor weatherproof industrial igabit Ethernet switch that delivers data and high power DC, i.e., up to 95W Type 4 per PoE port, over one single network cable protected with an IP68 compliant weatherproof enclosure, and the total system power is 300W. The outdoor weatherproof rating of the systems is strictly based on how the top cover is closed. For the hinged cover without the four top cover screws, the outdoor weatherproof rating is IP66 and, otherwise, the outdoor rating is IP68 with the four top cover screws securely closed with the enclosure.

The LPS3400ATMP-300-T1 Outdoor Layer 2+ Managed Gigabit PoE Swtich is designed for industrial and commercial applications, e.g., high performance video surveillance, high bandwidth wireless mesh, carrier wifi installations, and etc.

The terminal equipment, i.e., powered devices, such as weather-proof high power IP camera, high performance wireless AP and industrial IP telephony. With the two port Gigabit fiber ports, it can transfer data up to a distance of 120Km from SFP fiber port to a remote control center and the systems is also offer with powerful anti-electromagnetic interference feature.

Additionally, the LPS3400ATMP-300-T1 Layer 2+ Managed Gigabit PoE Series is designed for harsh outdoor environments with features such as a wide working temperature range from -30ºC to +70ºC and 3KV Ethernet port surge protection that can ensure the reliability of the uninterrupted PoE network operations. The LPS3400ATMP-300-T1 Outdoor Gigabit PoE Switch is a Managed network switch with Link Aggregation, VLAN, Trunking, SNMP, and QoS technology to meet the accelerating demand for powering the most demanding outdoor PoE devices. The LPS3400ATMP-300-T1 Gigabit PoE Switch provide LED displays internally that show device status for easy power management and troubleshooting. The PoE technology conveniently eliminates the need to install networked devices with multiple wires, such as Inscape Data's IP cameras and SB300/BR300, and B3000/BR3000 wireless products, thereby reducing equipment and installation costs. The LPS3400ATMP-T1 Gigabit PoE Switch offers the following key features:
• Dual Power Input Redundancy with 120V~240AC and/or 48V DC • Compliant to IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3z, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3x,IEEE 802.1D, IEEE 802.3af, IEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.1p, IEEE802.1x, IEEE 802.1W, SNMP, IGMP standards
• Four 10/100/1000M self-sensing RJ45 port, support IEEE802.3bt Type 3 & Type 4 PoE power supply function
• Four gigabit SFP fiber ports are capable of high bandwidth and long distance transmission
• All ports support auto-flip (Auto MDI/MDIX)
• Each PoE port can provide power 60W and up to 95W
• Supply 95W PoE++ DC power for powered devices compatible with IEEE802.3af/at
• Port security, allows setting different security level on each port with password, 802.1x, IP&MAC address Guard, RADIUS, & TACACS+ ** LinkPower LPS Outdoor PoE Series Products are protected under several of Inscape Data's U.S. Patents.
• Support IEEE802.3x full duplex flow control and duplex back pressure flow control
• Two SFP fiber optic ports, support 2.5Gbps uplink network speed • 8K MAC address table, 12Gbps backplane bandwidth
• Its 4.5KV network port surge protection can adapt to harsh outdoor environment
• Working temperature from -30˚C ~ +70˚C at full load
• Compatible with Port-based VLAN, IEEE 802.1Q VLAN and GVRP protocols, & Dynamic VLAN MAC Address Authentication
• Support authentication features including TACACS+, IEEE 802.1x, HTTPS and SSH, and MAC address port locking
• Support SNMP V1/V2c/V3 for different levels network management • Adopt RMON to effectively improve network surveillance and forecasting capabilities Auto accident report through E-mail and the output of electric relay
All above images were taken for the purpose of these explanations; actual images may differ. (10-16) IEEE 802.3at
PoE Plus 30W

Restricted
Model Description Outdoor 6-Port Layer 2+ Gigabit Managed PoE Switch Model Name LPS3400ATMP-300-T1
Port Interface 4 * 10/100/1000 RJ45 Ports, 2 * Gigabit LC Optical Ports Optical Transmission
Distance 20KM, 1310nm
Forwarding Mode
Save and forwarding, link-speed forwarding ( Frame Size Range: 64~1536) Network Media
10BASE-T: UTP Cat 3, 4, 5（≤100 Meters）
100BASE-TX: UTP Cat 5/5e/6（≤100 Meters）
Performance
Specification
Bandwidth: 12Gbps (non-blocking）
Network Latency (100 to 100M bps): maximum delay less than 50 microseconds Packet forwarding rate: 8.93Mbps@64byts
MAC address table: 8K
MTBF: 539608 hours
Support protection for over-current, over-voltage and reverse connection Network Protocols and
PoE Standards
IEEE 802.3i 10BASET IEEE 802.3u 100BASETX IEEE 802.3x Flow Control IEEE 802.3abt Type 3 60W & Type 4 95W
LED Indicator Running Light: SYS, Interface Light: LINK, PoE Power Supply
AC Input voltage: 120V ~ 240V AC
DC Input voltage: 48V~57V
Power Connector: 3-Pin AC & 4-Pin DC industrial terminal Block System Power : 300W
Surge Protection: 6kv TP Port Surge Protection: 4.5Kv
Enclosure Dimension LxWxH: (12 x 10 x 4 inch, 304.8 x 250.4 x 101.6 mm) Working Environment
Working Temperature: -30～70℃
Storage Temperature: -40～85℃
Relative Humidity: 5%～95%, non-condensing Storage Humidity: 10%～95%, non-condensing Working Height: 3000M above sea level（10,000ft） Storage Height: 3000M above sea level（10,000ft）
Radiation
CE mark, commercial
FCC Part 15 Class B
Certification
CE Mark ,Commercial CE/LVD FCC,
RoHS、C-TICK, UL
Warranty 3 Years

PACKAGE CONTENTS
 LinkPower LPS3400ATMP-300-T1 Gigabit PoE
Switch
 User’s Manual
 Quick Install Guide
 3-Year Warranty Information
 APCK0001 AC Power Cable Kit

THE LEADING

OUTDOOR NETWORK

APPLIANCE COMPANY
Total Turnkey Solutions for Outdoor PoE, Wired/Wireless, and IP Video Applications  PFCK0001-3 Power & Fiber Connector Kit
 ECK0001-4 Ethernet Connector Kit
 WMK0001 Wall Mount Kit with 4 Flanges (Standard)
 MMK0001-L Pole Mount Kit (Optional)
Product Information Online: http://www.inscapedata.com/lps3000-t1-mgt.htm Corporate Headquarters
1620 Oakland Road, Suite D101, San Jose, CA 95131, U.S.A.

PHONE +1.408.392.9800 FAX +1.408.392.9812
EMAIL [email protected]
© Copyright 2018, Inscape Data Corporation, All Rights Reserved. LinkPower, AirEther, AirGoogle and Inscape Data are trademarks of Inscape Data Corporation TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS PAGE 2

Restricted
Disclaimer: While every effort is made to ensure the information given is accurate, Inscape Data Corporation does not accept liability for any errors or mistakes which may arise. All specifications are subject to change without notice.

SOFTWARE SPECIFICATIONS PAGE 3
Restricted
Layer 2+ Switching
Spanning Tree
Protocol (STP)
Standard Spanning Tree 802.1d
Rapid Spanning Tree (RSTP) 802.1w
G.8032 ERPS <50ms ring protection for industrial high reliable application Aggregation
Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP) IEEE 802.3ad; Up to 7 groups ; Up to 14 ports per group
VLAN
Support up to 4K VLANs simultaneously (out of 4096 VLAN IDs) ; Port-based VLAN; 802.1Q tag-based VLAN, GVRP, Dynamic VLAN MAC Address Authentication IGMP v1/v2
snooping
IGMP limits bandwidth-intensive multicast traffic to only the requesters; supports 1024 multicast groups (source-specific multicasting is not supported) Security
Secure Shell
(SSH) Protocol
SSH secures Telnet traffic in and out the switch, SSH v1 and v2 are supported Secure Sockets
Layer (SSL),
HTTPS
SSL encrypts the http traffic, allowing advance secure access to the browser-based management GUI in the switch
Port Security Locks MAC Addresses to ports, and limits the number of learned MAC addresses DHCP Snooping prevent unauthorized configuration and use of IP addresses, while providing support for IP Source Guard and ARP detection
IP Source Guard Prevents datagram with spoofed addresses from being in the network ARP Inspection Prevent ARP spoofing attacks and ARP
Storm control
Prevents traffic on a LAN from being disrupted by a broadcast, multicast, or unicast storm on a port
ACLs
Support for up to 256 entries; Drop or rate limitation based on source and destination MAC, VLAN ID or IP address, protocol, port, differentiated services code point (DSCP) / IP precedence, TCP/ UDP source and destination ports, 802.1p priority, Ethernet type, Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) packets, IGMP packets, TCP flag Quality of Service
Hardware Support 8 hardware queues
Scheduling 8 COS (Class of Service) queues per port support strict priority and weighted round-robin (WRR) Classification Port based; 802.1p (PCP) VLAN priority based; Rate Limiting Ingress policer; egress shaping and rate control; per VLAN,per port and flow based Management (Web/ SSL, Telnet/ SSH, ping, Trivial File Transfer Protocol (TFTP), SNMP, Syslog) Web GUI
interface
Built-in switch configuration utility for browser-based device configuration (HTTP/HTTPs).

Supports configuration, system dashboard, maintenance, and monitoring Dual Image Dual image provides independent primary and secondary OS files for backup while upgrading
Firmware
upgrade
Web browser upgrade (HTTP/ HTTPs) and TFTP; Upgrade through console port as well Port
mirroring
Traffic on a port can be mirrored to another port for analysis with a network analyzer or RMON probe. Up to N-1 (N is Switch’s Ports) ports can be mirrored to single destination port.

A single session is supported.

Other
management
Single IP management; HTTP/HTTPs; SSH; RADIUS; TACACS+, DHCP Client; SNTP; cable diagnostics; ping; syslog; Telnet client (SSH secure support)

LinkPower LPS3400ATMP-300 -T1 Datasheet PAGE 4
Restricted
4 HIGH POWER POE

IR FIXED
CAMERA
POE

WIRELESS
BRIDGE
SFP
Backhaul Gateway
Network Switch

HIGH POWER POE
ACCESS
POINT

HIGH POWER

POE PTZ
CAMERA 100 ~ 240V AC
INPUT
SFP

SYSTEM CONFIGURATION
LinkPower™ LPS3400ATMP-300-T1
Managed Gigabit PoE Switch

STANDARD ACCESSORIES OPTIONAL ACCESSORIES
ECK0001-2
Ethernet Connector Kit
WMK0001
Wall Mounting Kit
APCK0001
AC Power Cord Kit
MMK0001-L Mast
Mounting Kit
(For Pole Diameter
from 2" to 4.5”)
WPCK0001-3-4
DC Power Cord Kit

ENCLOSURE DRAWINS & INTERFACES ELECTRICAL PIN OUT DIAGRAM 10"x5"x4" (WxLxH) Internal
10/100/1000Mbps

POWER PIN OUT
PD and PSE Eight-Pin RJ45 Modular Jack
1+Power
2+Power
3–Power
4 5
6–Power
7 8
(Hotel) Space for Wiring Storage
Pole Mount View
LPS3400ATMP-T1 Connector Interfaces
To Use Conduit Connectors, the Diameter of
Hole Size is 1.0 Inch

1. Weatherproof PoE Connector (1~4)

2. Weatherproof SFP Cable Connector
(1~2)

3. Weatherproof AC / DC Power Cable
Connector

4. Vent Plug

THE LEADING

OUTDOOR NETWORK

APPLIANCE COMPANY
Total Turnkey Solutions for Outdoor PoE, Wired/Wireless, and IP Video Applications Product Information Online: http://www.inscapedata.com/lps3000-t1-mgt.htm Corporate Headquarters
1620 Oakland Road, Suite D101, San Jose, CA 95131, U.S.A.

PHONE +1.408.392.9800 FAX +1.408.392.9812
EMAIL [email protected]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

LinkPower LPS3400ATMP-300 -T1 Datasheet PAGE 5
Restricted
© Copyright 2018, Inscape Data Corporation, All Rights Reserved. LinkPower, AirEther, AirGoogle and Inscape Data are trademarks of Inscape Data Corporation,Revision 1.8 Disclaimer: While every effort is made to ensure the information given is accurate, Inscape Data Corporation does not accept liability for any errors or mistakes which may arise. All specifications are subject to change without notice.

Restricted
Total PoE Solutions for Wired/Wireless,
IP Video, & Smart City Applications
Key Features & Benefits
,
120~ 240V AC
Ethernet Switch
(POE)
ACCESS
POINT
(POE)

WIRELESS
BRIDGE
(POE)
RFID
READER
(POE)
FIXED
CAMERA
(POE)
PTZ
CAMERA
1Voltage Status can be 12V DC, 24V DC, 48V DC, or 802.3af depending on the models.

All above images were taken for the purpose of these explanations; actual images may differ. (03/2010-T) AC
RJ45
LinkPower™
PIS2095
PoE
AC Port
 Supply power to 5 classes network
surveillance cameras
 2x 10/100/1000 Mbps RJ45 ports
 Support network port, lightning-proof
power input port (the secondary
lightning protection)
 PoE power supply type is four line pairs
of twisted pair, the positive power
supply side is 1/2 or 4/5 line pair, and
the negative power supply side is 3/6 o
7/8 line pair
 Support LT PoE++ high power standard
compatible with IEEE802.3af/
IEEE802.3at standard
 Single port PoE output power is 95W,
output voltage is 47.04~50.4V , and the
total power is 100.8W
 No fans, natural cooling, small and
exquisite, no noise design, suitable for
outdoor installation
 IP67* Compliant Rating And Water Tigh
Connectors Based On Patent Pending
Technology
 External LEDs - Highly Visible LED
Indicator for Ethernet Link, PoE Power,
System Power, & AC Output Port.
* When used with the included watertight
connector kit
OUTD

OOR HIGH POWER DC GIGABIT INJECTOR
L
inkPower™ PIS2095 95W 10/100/1000Mbps 2-Port
G
igabit PoE Injector
Inscap
e Data’s LinkPower™ PIS2095 two port 10/100/1000M PoE (Power over Ethernet) Inj
ector is a Gigabit high power 95W DC PoE injector, and it is designed with Texas Instruments's
latest TPS23881 chipset and supports IEEE802.3bt high power standard and is backwar
d compatible with IEEE 802.3af/IEEE802.3at standards. The maximum output power is 100W
, and the total system power is 100.8W. There are two RJ45 network ports, and one of
which is used as an uplink port to a switch or to another network device. Another network
port is the PoE port that integrated PoE power output and network data. The high po
wer DC output simplifies the overall installation by eliminating the need for a power cord, su
ch as, high power network dome cameras or other high power IP devices.

A
pplications
•
Smart City
• IP Video Surveillance
• Campus Network
• Wireless Mesh Network
• Border Security Surveillance
• Municipal Network
•
Energy & Refineries
• Hospitality Network
• Hotel Resort Network
• Hotspot Integration
• VOIP Service
• Traffic Monitoring
S
ystem Configurations

Restricted
Product Name 10/100/1000M 95W Two Port PoE Injector
Product Model PIS2095
Connector Type 2x 10/100/1000M copper cable RJ45 ports, 1x Data input port, 1x PoE output port PoE Power Supply
Type
PoE power supply is four line pairs of twisted pair, the positive power supply side is 1/2 or 4/5 line pair, the negative power supply side is 3/6 or 7/8 line pair 10BASE-T: 5 class UTP(≤100m）
100BASE-TX: 5 class or more UTP(≤100m）Network Medium
1000BASE-TX: 5 class or more UTP (≤100m）
PoE output voltage: 48.0~50.4V
Working Speed:10/100/1000Mbps
Network Port Protection: meet the IEC61000-4-2(ESD)
Performance
Specifications
MTBF: 100,000 hours
IEEE 802.3i 10BASET
IEEE 802.3u 100BASETX
IEEE 802.3x Flow Control
IEEE 802.1ab 1000BASET
IEEE 802.3af DTE Power via MDI
Network Protocols
and Standards
Support LT PoE++ high power PoE standard, compatible with IEEE 802.3af/ IEEE 802.3at standard
LEDs Indicator PoE working status
Total system power: 100.8W
PoE output power: 95WPower
Input Voltage: 120V ~240V AC, Output Voltage: 48.0 - 50.4V DC Dimension/Weight LxWxH: 193.80mm x 117.60mm x 78.49mm (7.63x4.63x3.09 inch) / 4LB / 1.8kg Working Temperature: -30°～70°C, Storage Temperature: -20°～ 75°C Working
Environment
Working Humidity: 10% ～ 90%, non-condensing, Storage humidity:10% ～95%, non-condensing, Weatherproof to IP67 Compliance
Safety & EMC CE mark, commercial, FCC Part 15 Class B, RoHS UL60950-1, TUV EN60950-1 Approved
Warranty 3-year warranty
PD and PSE Eight-Pin RJ45 Modular Jack

PACKAGE CONTENTS
 PIS2095 (1)
 WECK0001 Waterproof Ethernet Connector Kit (1)
 WPCK0001 Waterproof Power Cord Kit (1)
 User Manual (1)
 3-Year Warranty Sheet (1)
 MMK0001-XS Pole Mount Kit (1) (Optional)
United States Headquarters 1620 Oakland Road, Suite D101, CA 95131, U.S.A.

PHONE +1.408.392.9800 TOLL FREE +1.888.267.4507 FAX +1.408.392.9812 EMAIL [email protected] Revision 1.0
Total PoE Solutions for Wired/Wireless, IP Video, & Smart City Applications Technical Specifications
© Copyright 2010, Inscape Data Corporation, All Rights Reserved. LinkPower, AirEther, AirGoogle and Inscape Data are trademarks of Inscape Data Corporation Disclaimer: While every effort is made to ensure the information given is accurate, Inscape Data Corporation does not accept liability for any errors or mistakes which may arise. All specifications are subject to change without notice.

PSE Pinout PD Pinout
R
J45 Conductor
Pin#
8 02.3af
Mode A
802.3af Mode B/
Passive PoE*
802.3af
Mode A
802.3af Mode B/
Passive PoE*
1 Rx,
V+ Rx TX+, V+ TX+
2 Rx,
V+ Rx TX-, V+ TX-
3 Tx,
V- Tx RX+, V- RX+
4 S
pare V+ V+
5 S
pare V+ V+
6 Tx,
V- T
x RX-,
V- R
X-
7 S
pare V- V-
8 S
pare V- V-

Restricted
ALFAL
0 Key Differentiators
o Complete portfolio of microwave and
millimeter wave backhaul solutions from 6 to
80 GHz including NMS
o 100 Mbps to 20 Gbps data rates
o Excellent Quality Products, ISO9001:2008
o High MTBF – up to 147 years
o USA based pre- and post- sales support
o Rapid delivery – established distributors
o Centralized SIAE warehouse with stock
o Excellent channel partner program
o Design & Turnkey services
Vertical Markets
o Mobile / Cellular Operators
o Public Telephone Operators (PTO/PTT)
o Service Providers (Tier II and Tier III)
o Local Exchange Carriers (CLEC, ILEC)
o Wireless Service Providers (WISPs)
o Industrial (utilities, oil & gas)
o Transportation (railroads, highways)
o Government (local, state, municipal)
o Schools (Universities, K-12)
o Private Network Expansion (WLAN)
o Fiber Replacement for fast ROI
FOPlus2 ALFOPlus1 ALFOPlus AGS20 ALFOPlus80HDX OPlus80HD NMS5
Frequency Type Max Capacity Modulation # of Carriers # of Ports Power Encryption ALFOPlus2 6L, 6U, 11, 18, 23 All-Outdoor 2 Gbps 4096QAM Two 4x GbE -48V or PoE 128/256 AES PHC – yes ALFOPlus1 6L, 6U All-Outdoor 500 Mbps 4096QAM One 4x GbE -48V or PoE 128/256 AES PHC – yes ALFOPlus 11, 18, 23 All-Outdoor 500 Mbps 1024QAM One 2x GbE -48V or PoE No PHC – yes AGS20 6L, 11, 18, 23 Split-mount 500 Mbps x4 2048QAM Up to Four 10x GbE -48V 128/256 AES PHC – yes ALFOPlus80HDX 70/80 All-Outdoor 10 Gbps 256QAM One 2x10GbE, 2xGbE -48V or PoE 128/256 AES No Who We Are
o
o
o
o USA headquarters in Dallas, TX
o 1500+ employees
o 280,000+ radios shipped last 3 years
o
o
o
o

Restricted
ALFOPlus80HD 70/80 All-Outdoor 2 Gbps 64QAM One 2x GbE -48V or PoE 128/256 AES No

Restricted
Large portions of both developed and especially developing economies remain underserved in an ongoing pandemic
that makes real broadband more essential than ever.

Copper-based fixed access networks are increasingly
exhausted. Efforts to improve supply with fiber have
been throttled by prohibitively high costs and installation complications. Wireless alternatives continue to fail in the face of the significant technical challenges in gigabit-class fixed access, including pervasive obstructions, spectrum scarcity, interference, changing conditions, and unworkable deployment models.

Tarana innovation has solved all these problems. Our
software-defined Gigabit 1 system (G1) is powered by the results of more than ten years of focused R&D, and crafted from its custom silicon up to its cloud-based service
automation with a completely fresh approach to fixed
wireless. Extensively validated by tier-1 operators and in mass-scale deployment now, our fundamental advances
in multi-radio performance completely transform the
economics of delivering gigabit-class access.

Fast broadband
is more essential than ever.

Getting it to the home is hard.

We’ve made it easy.
c Fiber quality
c in free, unlicensed spectrum
c at massive scale
A whole new approach to broadband
Introducing . . . GIGABIT 1

Restricted
Residential Coverage
Sacramento, California Metro Area Example
G1 Range in 61,100
3 GHz Households
Passed
21,700
10,100
G1 in
5 GHz
22,800
8,100
3,700
68 For reference:
5G mm-wave (28 GHz)
Cell-Edge Mbps 25m tower, 1,000 HH/km2
800 Erceg B propagation
Sacramento, CA example
500
200 1 km
Network Economics
Cost per GPON
Household 28 GHz (mm wave)
Passed Tarana G1
Cost per GPON
Household 28 GHz (mm wave)
Served Tarana G1
Unprecedented residential non-line-of-sight
coverage and massive capacity per site fuel dramatic
improvements in network economics
c Up to 800 Mbps aggregate throughput per link
c Up to 9.6 Gbps capacity / site / 80 MHz channel
(using free, unlicensed spectrum)
c 1024 users / site (256 / sector)
c Industry-first complete cancellation of
unlicensed-band interference
c 3 or 5 GHz
c Cellular deployment model
c Suburban full-NLoS range to 1.5 km, rural nLoS to 3 km, LoS to 30+ km
c Compact, integrated base node and low-cost
residential node
c Enhanced TR101 Broadband Forum network
architecture
c Comprehensive cloud suite for planning, zero-touch
config, monitoring, SDN management, and support
automation
c Software-defined radios, enabling automated, cloud-
managed performance upgrades
G1 Highlights

Restricted
A simple IP-based network architecture, supported by the Tarana Cloud Suite, enables multiple subscriber access models for highly cost-efficient residential, SMB, and enterprise service RNs
Enterprise / MDU
Low-Cost
Wireless
Fanout
Home
with Wi-Fi
BNs
Tarana Cloud Suite
Portals
Admin
Analytics
RF Planning

CBRS SAS
Knowledge DB
AAA (for Infra.)
Services
Control
API
Operator Cloud
Portals
Subscriber
Installer
B/OSS
Subscribers
DHCP
AAA
Data

Subscribers Tarana Aggregation Management Internet
Network Domains
The Tarana Cloud Suite powers efficient network planning, zero-touch provisioning, SDN management, and support automation — featuring…
Subscriber Service
Activation
API support for zero-touch deployment configuration, with minimal to no changes on directly connected infrastructure Infrastructure authentication
QoS management
Speed test tools
Management and
Maintenance
24x7x365 KPI monitoring and management, including long-term historic data Fault logging, correction, and reporting
Firmware and configuration management automation with pre-provisioning support Operator and installer portals
Radio and
Network Planning
Integration
(US only, requires
HH data)
Spectrum management — CBRS SAS domain proxy
Coverage footprint prediction (heatmap in Google Earth) and capacity of each cell or sector Cell densification analysis
Household-level service-level estimation to help sales and business teams identify and target customers Fault
Management and
Network Analytics
Alarms and historic events with e-mail alerts
User-defined threshold-based alerts
Alarm Correlation, Capacity Expansion, Anomaly Detection REST API for
Carrier System
Integration
Performance management KPIs, device inventory, and network topology Subscriber provisioning and billing integration
Geo-mapping
information
End-user login and management with role-based access

Restricted
s
Specifications subject to change without notice.
© 2021 Tarana Wireless, Inc. All rights reserved.

Tarana G1 System Specifications
Radio Network Elements BN: Base Node
RN: Residential Node
Topology Scheduled, concentrated multi-point
Maximum # of Users Per BN 256
Per Site (4 BNs) 1024
Ch
annel Bandwidth BN 80
MHz (2 x 40MHz)
RN 80 MHz (2 x 40MHz)
Aggregate Throughput (UL + DL) Per Link 800 Mbps
Pe
r BN 2.4 Gbps
Per Site (4 BNs) 9.6 Gbps
D
uplexing T
DD
Downlink/ Uplink Ratio 1.44:1 or 4.5:1 (network-wide)
Modulation OFDM, adaptive MCS: QPSK to 256 QAM 7.35/8
MIMO Streams Per Link 1x1, 2x2
MU-MIMO Streams at Aggregation Point 6 MU-MIMO streams per BN 24 MU-MIMO streams per site
Spectral Efficiency 30 bps/Hz per BN
75-90 bps/Hz per site, configuration dependent
Range (full rate, frequency dependent) NLoS 500-1500 m
nLoS 1000-3000 m
L
oS 3
0km+
Recommended Frequency Reuse Factor Universal frequency reuse (k = 1) Enabled by advanced self-interference cancellation
Form Factor BN Outdoor micro enclosure (fully-integrated antenna, RF, and baseband) 3 or 4 BNs for 360° coverage
RN Outdoor, single enclosure (fully-integrated antenna, RF, and baseband) Beamforming Auto-convergent, retro-directive
I
nterference Management S
elf-interference cancellation,
Advanced Burst Interference Cancellation (ABIC)
Scheduler Advanced 3D frame-based scheduling
Frequency Support 3.550-3.700 GHz (US CBRS)

5.150-5.250 GHz (FCC)
5 .725-5.850 GHz (FCC)
Latency (1-way avg) < 5 msec
ACM Hitless automatic modulation rate control
Management / Control Plane Security Certificate, HTTPS
Data Plane Security RF Link Encryption AES-128
C
ompliance F
CC C.F.R 47, Part 15, Part 96
Safety IEC 6236801, IEC 60529
Tarana Cloud Suite Scalable microservices-based multi-tenant network management Zer
o-touch provisioning and control of radios with streaming telemetry Firmware and configuration management
24x7x365 KPI monitoring and management
Fault management and historical events
Network Analytics
S
AS-Domain Proxy
Northbound Rest-API for Customer and operator portal (B/OSS) I
nterfaces BN Dual
10 Gbps SFP+ data interfaces.

Additional 1 Gbps mgmt Ethernet interface.
48V DC Power
RN 1
Gbps Ethernet interface, with PoE support
HxWxD
(inches) BN 1

6.6x21.2x4.7
RN 11x12.5x3
Weig
ht (lb.) BN 38
RN 7
Power Consumption (Typical) BN 275W
RN 3
5W
Mounting BN S
addle clamp for pole mount (2-3/8" - 5" OD)
RN B
and clamp for pole mount (1.5"-2.5" OD)

Restricted

6. Pricing

SmartWave Technologies LLC
Confidential and Proprietary Page 1
Restricted
No Product Description Material Labor Total Unit
Price Pricing Notes
PTMP Unit Pricing
Includes Terragraph Distribution Node, Mounting Bracket, Outdoor Rated POE Switch, Photocell Power Cable,
1 Terragraph 60GHz Distribution Node Installed $ 2,900.00 $ 2,575.00 $ 5,475.00 Installation (Does not include conduit, NEMA Enclosure, Electrical Work, or Tower Work). Assumes location is roof top or bucket truck accessible.

Includes Radio/Subsriber Unit/CPE, Mounting Bracket,
Terragraph 60GHz Client Node (1Gbps) - Outdoor Rated POE Injector, Photocell Power Cable, Surge 2 Installed on a Street Light or Building $ 900.00 $ 1,250.00 $ 2,150.00 Protection, Installation (Does not include conduit, NEMA Enclosure, or Electrical Work). Assumes location is a street light or utility pole and is bucket truck accessible.

Includes Radio/Base Station Unit, Mounting Bracket,
Outdoor Rated POE Switch, Photocell Power Cable,
3 5GHz Unlicensed BSU (1Gbps) - Installed $ 2,675.00 $ 2,575.00 $ 5,250.00 Installation (Does not include conduit, NEMA Enclosure, Electrical Work, or Tower Work). Assumes location is roof top or bucket truck accessible.

Includes Radio/Subsriber Unit/CPE, Mounting Bracket,
5GHz Unlicensed SU (500Mbps) - Installed on Outdoor Rated POE Injector, Photocell Power Cable, Surge 4 a Street Light or Traffic Signal $ 650.00 $ 1,250.00 $ 1,900.00 Protection, Installation (Does not include conduit, NEMA Enclosure, or Electrical Work). Assumes location is a street light or utility pole and is bucket truck accessible.

Includes Radio/Base Node, Tower Mounting Bracket, Fiber 5 Massive MIMO 5GHz Unlicensed BSU $ 20,500.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 24,500.00 Cabling, DC Power Cabling, Installation (Does not include (2.4Gbps) - Tower Installed conduit, Sled, NEMA Enclosure, or Electrical Work).

Assumes location is Tower Mounted.

Includes Radio/Subsriber Unit/CPE, Mounting Bracket,
Massive MIMO 5GHz Unlicensed SU Outdoor Rated POE Injector, Photocell Power Cable, Surge 6 (800Mbps) - Installed on a Street Light or $ 1,500.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 3,500.00 Protection, Installation, 1YR Subscription (Does not include Traffic Signal conduit, NEMA Enclosure, or Electrical Work). Assumes location is a street light or utility pole and is bucket truck accessible.

PTP - Licensed and Unlicensed Unit Pricing

SmartWave Technologies LLC
Confidential and Proprietary Page 2
Restricted
7 Licensed 11/18GHz PTP Link (Up to 1Gbps) -
Installed
8 Unlicensed 24GHz or 60GHz PTP Link (Up to
1Gbps) - Installed
9 Mesh Access Point Unit Pricing
10 Pole Mounted Root AP Location (High
Capacity 4x4+ AP) - Installed
11 Pole Mounted Mesh AP Location (High
Capacity 4x4+ AP) - Installed
12 Pole Mounted Root AP Location (2x2 MIMO or
comparable) - Installed
13 Pole Mounted Mesh AP Location (2x2 MIMO
or comparable) - Installed
Other Unit Pricing Items
14 Mesh AP Cloud Control and Support - 1 Year
8x5xNBD Licensed or Unlicensed PTP/PTMP
Includes 2 Radios, Antennas, Power supplies, Surge
Protection, 250FT Cat6 Cable, Tower Mounts, License
Registration, Path Analysis and Installation (Does not
include conduit, electrical work, switches, or NEMA
Enclosures)
Includes 2 Radios, Antennas, Power supplies, Surge
Protection, 250FT Cat6 Cable, Tower Mounts, Path
Analysis and Installation (Does not include conduit,
electrical work, switches, or NEMA Enclosures)
Includes 2 Radios, Antennas, Power supplies, Surge
Protection, 250FT Cat6 Cable, Tower Mounts, Path
Analysis and Installation (Does not include conduit,
electrical work, switches, or NEMA Enclosures)
Includes Root Mesh AP, Outdoor POE Switch, Surge
Protection, Photocell Power Cable, Mounting Brackets, AP License, Installation
Includes Mesh AP, Outdoor POE Injector, Surge Protection, Photocell Power Cable, Mounting Brackets, AP License,
Installation
Includes Root Mesh AP, Outdoor POE Switch, Surge
Protection, Photocell Power Cable, Mounting Brackets, AP License, Installation
Includes Mesh AP, Outdoor POE Injector, Surge Protection, Photocell Power Cable, Mounting Brackets, AP License,
Installation
Per Device - Network monitoring, optimization and Truck Roll services required for maintenance related services.

Does not include move, add, change work, or manufacturer extended warranties.

Per Device - Network monitoring, optimization and Truck Roll services required for maintenance related services. 15a Support - 1 YR (Does not include responses
to PCN requests) - 1 to 10 Radios Supported
Does not include move, add, change work, or manufacturer extended warranties. Does not include responses to PCN
requests.
$ 23,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 30,000.00
$ 6,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 10,000.00
Unli
censed 5GHz 1Gbps PTP Link $ 2,500.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 6,500.00 $ 3,400.00 $ 1,750.00 $ 5,150.00
$ 2,400.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 3,900.00
$ 2,000.00 $
1,750.00 $ 3,750.00
$ 1,250.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 2,750.00
$
225.00 $ 225.00
$ 450.00 $ 450.00