Agenda packet — Berkeley City Council, June 9, 2026 (part 4 of 10)

Page 408 ends

Office of the City Manager
2180 Milvia Street, Berkeley, CA 94704 ● Tel: (510) 981-7000 ● Fax: (510) 981-7099 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: https://berkeleyca.gov/

PUBLIC HEARING
June 9, 2026
(Continued from May 19, 2026)
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Paul Buddenhagen, City Manager
Submitted by: Scott Gilman, Director, Health, Housing & Community Services Department
Subject: Changes to the Environmental Health Fee Schedule

RECOMMENDATION
Conduct a public hearing and, upon conclusion, adopt a Resolution:

1. Approving revisions to the fee schedule for the Environmental Health Division (EHD) effective July 1, 2026, and,

2. Rescinding Resolution No. 71,354-N.S. effective July 1, 2026.

SUMMARY
The fees currently charged by the EHD have remained largely unchanged since 2011 while inflation has increased approximately 40%.

While additional facility categories and fees were added to the EHD fee schedule in 2016, 2021, and 2024 to reflect newly created categories of food facilities as defined in the California Retail Food Code (CRFC), existing fees were not updated or increased at those times. Medical marijuana dispensaries were added in 2016, microenterprise home kitchen operations were added in 2021, and compact mobile food operations were added in 2024. There have been no increases to any of these new fees.

The Health, Housing, and Community Services (HHCS) Department is proposing a new comprehensive fee structure (attached) needed to sustain EHD operations. The proposed fee structure and recommendations are based on a cost-of-service study, facilitated by third-party consultant, Wohlford Consulting.

The goals of this study included:
 Updating the current EHD fee structure to reflect actual work effort, complexity and cost of service; and
 Aligning the City’s current permit and hourly fees with surrounding Bay Area Environmental Health jurisdictions; and

Page 1 of 16 ends

Page 409 ends

Changes to the Environmental Health Fee Schedule PUBLIC HEARING June 9, 2026

Page 2 ends

 Assessing fees based on the different levels of “risk” to the public associated with different facility risk profiles and establishing fees accordingly.

There are 139 proposed fees included in this recommendation. Below are examples and a comparison of other Bay Area jurisdictions for some of the most common fees.

The table shows current and proposed fees for the City. Alameda County has not updated their fees since 2021.

Table 1
Fee Comparison (Annual rates) Between City of Berkeley & Bay Area Counties Facility
Type
Berkeley
Current
Berkeley
Proposed
Alameda
Effective
7/1/21
San
Francisco
Effective
7/1/25-
6/30/26
Contra
Costa
Effective
6/24/25
Santa Clara
Effective
1/15/2026
San Mateo
Effective
1/1/25
Full-Service
Restaurant $704 $1,004 $998 $1,103 $2,132 $2,281 $2,460 Retail Grocery
Store
(15,000 sq ft)
$1,409 $1,780 $589 $1,358 $2,249 $1,001 $1,524
Fast-Food
Franchise
(standardized
practices)
$1,171 $1,325 $1,194 $1,664 $1,823 $1,549 $1,938
High-Risk
Pool/Spa $704 $1,155 $891 $842 $1,581 $1,292 $1,244
Body Art
Facility $366 $810 $435 $1,773 $871 $845 $778

FISCAL IMPACTS OF RECOMMENDATION
The proposed fee structure is designed to move the EHD toward a sustainable cost- recovery model. Currently, the City subsidizes EHD’s operating budget by approximately $980,000 in General Fund resources annually.

As summarized in Table 2 below, adopting the new fee structure will:
 Generate Revenue: Increase annual EHD revenue by approximately $666,663 in FY 27 (with an annual consumer price index adjustment).  Expand Capacity: Provide the resources to hire two (2) additional inspectors (increasing staff from 4 FTE to 6 FTE) to be able to perform required inspections in a timely manner.
 Modernize Operations: Increased staffing will also support a public-facing placard program and the transition to the Accela Civic Platform.

Page 2 of 16 ends

Page 410 ends

Changes to the Environmental Health Fee Schedule PUBLIC HEARING June 9, 2026

Page 3 ends

 Fiscal Relief: Reduce the General Fund subsidy by approximately $229,960 annually once the placard program is fully implemented.

Table 2
New Fee Structure
5-year projection: FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031
Revenue increase $666,663 $686,663 $707,263 $728,481 $750,335 Ongoing Exp Increase 2 FTE $436,703 $447,621 $458,811 $470,281 $482,038 Additional General Fund
Revenue (Rev-Exp):
$229,960 $239,042 $248,452 $258,200 $268,297
With respect to the 2 additional FTE staff, HHCS anticipates hiring them in FY 2027, after submitting the request as part of the AAO#1 process.

CURRENT SITUATION AND ITS EFFECTS
The City Auditor issued a report on July 10, 2024, Berkeley Restaurant Inspections:

Chronically Understaffed Program Did Not Meet Targets1. The staffing shortage referenced in the report has prevented the Environmental Health Division (EHD) from meeting its essential inspection targets, potentially compromising food inspection oversight.

These findings were further substantiated by a comprehensive cost-of-service study and time-study analysis conducted by Wohlford Consulting. The analysis revealed the following:
 Staffing Gap: Based on a baseline of 4,533 total annual inspections and a standard of 697 inspections per Full-Time Equivalent (FTE), the City requires 6 FTEs to meet its targets. EHD currently only has 4 FTEs dedicated to inspections, resulting in a 2 FTE staffing deficit.
 Budgetary Subsidy: Because inspection fees have remained largely flat since 2011, the City’s General Fund currently subsidizes EHD operations by approximately $980,000 annually.
 Technological Needs: EHD is currently burdened by additional costs associated with transitioning from its legacy software (Envision Connect) to the Accela Civic Platform, a necessary move to improve data accuracy and customer service. 1 https://berkeleyca.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Berkeley_Restaurant_Inspections_- _Chronically_Understaffed_Program_Did_Not_Meet_Targets.pdf

Page 3 of 16 ends

Page 411 ends

Changes to the Environmental Health Fee Schedule PUBLIC HEARING June 9, 2026

Page 4 ends

To address the issues outlined above, the proposed fee schedule has been proposed for City Council consideration. If adopted by the City Council, this comprehensive fee update will allow the City to adequately staff the food facility inspection program, improve transparency through placarding, and ultimately reduce the General Fund burden by approximately $229,960 annually.

New fees are proposed to go into effect on July 1, 2026, which does not impact current facility operators for calendar year 2026. Since permit fee invoicing occurs on a calendar year basis (typically in December for the following calendar year), current operators have already been billed for calendar year 2026. The new proposed fees would impact new facilities beginning operations on, or after, July 1, 2026. Facility owners will be notified of the fee changes/increases by US Mail, within two weeks of Council adoption, to allow for ample planning in advance. In addition, environmental health inspectors will notify facility operators in person during regular inspections, after Council adoption of new fees.

BACKGROUND
The EHD administers various public health programs. These programs rely primarily upon fees for their operation and fall into two main categories:

1. State-Mandated Programs (Fee-Supported)
 Retail Food Safety Inspection Program
 Public Pool and Spa Inspection Program
 Tattoo and Body Piercing Registration Program

2. Local Programs (Required by Berkeley Municipal Code) are funded by grants, assessment district proceeds, or City special revenue funds.  Vector Control Program
 Styrofoam Ban
 Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program
 Restaurant Stormwater Protection Inspection Program
 Sewer Emergency Response Program
 Tobacco Licensing Program
 Water Quality Monitoring Program (for the Aquatic Park, as an additional public health inspection service)

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE IMPACTS
Adjusting fees for the EHD programs will not negatively impact sustainability and climate impact goals. Several programs administered by the EHD support the City’s sustainability efforts.

Page 4 of 16 ends

Page 412 ends

Changes to the Environmental Health Fee Schedule PUBLIC HEARING June 9, 2026

Page 5 ends

RATIONALE FOR RECOMMENDATION
When fees are not regularly adjusted to keep pace with costs, service delivery becomes subsidized through other means. Over time, if left uncorrected, this will add to the structural budget deficit or force reductions in service time and quality. The fee changes proposed in this action would properly charge currently permitted businesses and prospective applicants for the expected costs of providing those services, without reducing the timeliness or efficiency of the services provided.

ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS CONSIDERED
Council could consider not approving the fee increases; however, this would increase health and safety risk.

CONTACT PERSON
Scott Gilman, Department Director, HHCS, (510) 981-5100 Ronald Torres, Manager, Environmental Health Division, HHCS, (510) 981-5261 Attachments:
1: Resolution
Exhibit A: Proposed New Environmental Health Fee schedule 2: Public Hearing Notice

Page 5 of 16 ends

Page 413 ends

RESOLUTION NO. ##,###-N.S.

FEE SCHEDULE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH REGULATION AND
INSPECTIONS EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2026
WHEREAS, Environmental Health program fees are intended to cover the actual costs of permit and inspection services; and
WHEREAS, the present fees for retail food facilities, recreational health, body art, and tobacco retail licenses have remained largely unchanged since 2011, while inflation has increased by approximately 40% during the same period; and WHEREAS, a 2024 City Auditor report and a 2025 cost-of-service study confirmed that the Environmental Health Division (EHD) is understaffed by 2.0 Full-Time Equivalent (FTE), preventing the City from meeting mandated inspection targets; and WHEREAS, the City currently subsidizes EHD operations by approximately $980,000 annually from the General Fund due to the gap between current fee revenue and the actual cost of service; and
WHEREAS, Council previously adopted Resolutions 67,495 (2016), 69,891 (2021), and 71,354 (2024) to add new facility categories, but these actions did not increase existing fee rates to keep pace with rising staffing and operational costs; and WHEREAS, the EHD is undergoing a necessary transition to the Accela Civic Platform and intends to implement a public-facing placard program to increase data accuracy and public transparency; and
WHEREAS, the recommended adoption of the new fee structure will result in an estimated $666,663 increase in annual revenue in FY 27, thereby reducing the General Fund subsidy of the EHD by approximately $229,960 annually, and ensure the long-term sustainability of public health oversight.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Berkeley that Resolution 71,354-N.S. is hereby rescinded effective June 30, 2026.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Proposed Annual Fees in the Fee Schedule for Environmental Health services, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A, are hereby adopted to cover the costs of regulations and inspections required by the Berkeley Municipal Code and the California Retail Food Code.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 2026.

EXHIBITS
A: Proposed New Environmental Health Fee schedule

Page 6 of 16 ends

Page 414 ends

Exhibit A
Environmental Health Division Fee Schedule

HEALTH AND SANITATION PERMIT AND FEE SCHEDULE

FOOD PROGRAM FEES
Fee Title Risk
Category Unit Capacity Current
Fees
Proposed
Fees
Onsite Food/Beverage 1-4 Sq ft 0-1000 $704 $1,004
Onsite Food/Beverage 1-2 Sq ft 1001-2500 $870 $1,354
Onsite Food/Beverage 1-2 Sq ft 2501-5000 $1,171 $1,704
Onsite Food/Beverage 1-2 Sq ft 5001-7500 $1,461 $2,054
Onsite Food/Beverage 1-2 Sq ft 7500 & Over $1,738 $2,404 Onsite Food/Beverage 3 & 4 Sq ft 1001-2500 $870 $1,554
Onsite Food/Beverage 3 & 4 Sq ft 2501-5000 $1,171 $1,904 Onsite Food/Beverage 3 & 4 Sq ft 5001-7500 $1,461 $2,254 Onsite Food/Beverage 3 & 4 Sq ft 7500 & Over $1,738 $2,604 Onsite Food/Beverage: Add-on Secondary Operation (Same
owner/location) 1 Sq ft 0-1000 $0 $382
Onsite Food/Beverage: Add-on Secondary Operation for each additional 1000 sq ft. (Same owner/location) 1 Sq ft up to 1000 $0 $382 Onsite Food/Beverage: Add-on Secondary Operation (Same
owner/location) 2 Sq ft 0-1000 $0 $742
Onsite Food/Beverage: Add-on Secondary Operation for each additional 1000 sq ft. (Same owner/location) 2 Sq ft up to 1000 $0 $742 Onsite Food/Beverage: Add-on Secondary Operation (Same
owner/location) 3 & 4 Sq ft 0-1000 $0 $1,179
Onsite Food/Beverage: Add-on Secondary Operation for each additional 1000 sq ft. (Same owner/location) 3 & 4 Sq ft up to 1000 $0 $1,179 No Onsite Food/Beverage Prep - Prepackaged Non-PHF 1 Sq ft 0-1000 $355 $450 No Onsite Food/Beverage Prep - Prepackaged Non-PHF 1 Sq ft 1001-2500 $519 $606 No Onsite Food/Beverage Prep - Prepackaged Non-PHF 1 Sq ft 2501-5000 $813 $762 No Onsite Food/Beverage Prep - Prepackaged Non-PHF 1 Sq ft 5001-7500 $1,109 $918 No Onsite Food/Beverage Prep - Prepackaged Non-PHF 1 Sq ft 7500 & Over $1,409 $1,074 No Onsite Food/Beverage Prep - Prepackaged PHF 2-3 Sq ft 0-1000 $519 $735 No Onsite Food/Beverage Prep - Prepackaged PHF 2-3 Sq ft 1001-2500 $704 $1,020 No Onsite Food/Beverage Prep - Prepackaged PHF 2-3 Sq ft 2501-5000 $980 $1,305

Page 7 of 16 ends

Page 415 ends

Environmental Health Division Fee Schedule
P a g e |2
Fee Title Risk
Category Unit Capacity Current
Fees
Proposed
Fees
No Onsite Food/Beverage Prep - Prepackaged PHF 2-3 Sq ft 5001-7500 $1,280 $1,590 No Onsite Food/Beverage Prep - Prepackaged PHF 2-3 Sq ft 7500 & Over $1,571 $1,875 No Onsite Food/Beverage Prep: Add-on Secondary Operation Prepackaged PHF/non PHF (same owner/location)
1-3 Sq ft 0-1000 $0 $362
No Onsite Food/Beverage Prep: Add-on Secondary Operation Prepackaged PHF/non PHF for each additional 1000 sq ft. (same owner/location)
1-3 Sq ft up to 1000 $0 $362
Minimal Onsite Food/Beverage Prep - single owner grocery store style operation in any risk category. Facilities with multiple onsite food prep add-on stations do NOT qualify.
1-2 Sq ft 0-1000 $355 $519
Minimal Onsite Food/Beverage Prep - single owner grocery store style operation in any risk category. Facilities with multiple onsite food prep add-on stations do NOT qualify.
1-2 Sq ft 1001-2500 $519 $675
Minimal Onsite Food/Beverage Prep - single owner grocery store style operation in any risk category. Facilities with multiple onsite food prep add-on stations do NOT qualify.
1-2 Sq ft 2501-5000 $813 $831
Minimal Onsite Food/Beverage Prep - single owner grocery store style operation in any risk category. Facilities with multiple onsite food prep add-on stations do NOT qualify.
1-2 Sq ft 5001-7500 $1,109 $987
Minimal Onsite Food/Beverage Prep - single owner grocery store style operation in any risk category. Facilities with multiple onsite food prep add-on stations do NOT qualify.
1-2 Sq ft 7500 & Over $1,409 $1,143
Commissary - Prepackaged Only 1-3 Annual 1 $355 $572
Commissary - with Food Prep 1-3 Annual 1 $704 $921
Motorized Mobile - prepackaged non-PHF only 1 Annual 1 $131 $258 Motorized Mobile 1 Annual 1 $406 $534
Motorized Mobile 2 Annual 1 $704 $942
Motorized Mobile 3 Annual 1 $704 $1,388
Non-motorized Mobile - prepackaged non-PHF only 1 Annual 1 $0 $258 Non-motorized Mobile 1 Annual 1 $0 $534
Non-motorized Mobile 2 Annual 1 $0 $942
Non-motorized Mobile 3 Annual 1 $0 $1,388
Compact Mobile Food Operation (CMFO) 1 Sq ft more than 25 $131 $527 Compact Mobile Food Operation (CMFO) 2 Sq ft more than 25 $406 $942 Compact Mobile Food Operation (CMFO) 3 Sq ft more than 25 $704 $1,380

Page 8 of 16 ends

Page 416 ends

Environmental Health Division Fee Schedule
P a g e |3
Fee Title Risk
Category Unit Capacity Current
Fees
Proposed
Fees
Mobile Support Unit 1-3 Annual 1 $0 $472
Special Event Application Review Fee - One Day event (4 or less vendors/event NTE 4 hours, fee per vendor, onsite inspection optional)
N/A Event 4 Vendors max,
NTE 4 hours $0 $117
Late Fee - Special Event Application Submission (less than 14 days before event) N/A Event N/A $170 $188
TFF Reinspection Fee - Next Day (1 hr min, 1/4 hr increments thereafter) N/A 1/4 hour 1 hour min $0 $250
Special Event Coordinator Permit (event with 2-4 vendors per location, 2 days max) N/A Event 2 to 4 Vendors $182 $375 Special Event Coordinator Permit (event with 5-10 vendors per location, 2 days max) N/A Event 5 to 10 Vendors $182 $500 Special Event Coordinator Permit - Add-on for up to 5 vendors, 2 days max N/A Vendor Up to 5 $182 $92
Special Event - Add-on Additional Days (up to 3 consecutive days for all Vendors/Coords) 1 Day Up to 3 $0 $158
Special Event - Add-on Additional Days (up to 3 consecutive days for all Vendors/Coords) 2 & 3 Day Up to 3 $0 $170
Special Event Food/Beverage Vendor/Booth - Unopened
prepackaged non-PHF only 1 Event 1 $44 $250
Special Event Food/Beverage Vendor/Booth - Unopened
prepackaged PHF 2 & 3 Event 1 $98 $554
Special Event Food/Beverage Vendor/Booth 1 Event 1 $44 $125 Special Event Food/Beverage Vendor/Booth 2 Event 1 $182 $250 Special Event Food/Beverage Vendor/Booth 3 Event 1 $182 $375 Farmer's/Flea Market - Annual Permit - prepackaged non-PHF - sampling only - Vendor/Booth 1 Annual 1 $44 $44
Farmer's/Flea Market - Annual Permit - Vendor/Booth 1 Annual 1 $406 $500 Farmer's/Flea Market - Annual Permit - Limited preparation only - Vendor/Booth 2 Annual 1 $546 $625
Farmer's/Flea Market - Annual Permit - Full preparation - Vendor/Booth 3 Annual 1 $546 $750
Seasonal Temporary Permit - prepackaged non-PHF only
(Vendors) 1 Day 30-90 $250 $125

Page 9 of 16 ends

Page 417 ends

Environmental Health Division Fee Schedule
P a g e |4
Fee Title Risk
Category Unit Capacity Current
Fees
Proposed
Fees
Seasonal Temporary Permit (Vendors) 1 Day 30-90 $250 $250 Seasonal Temporary Permit (Vendors) 2 Day 30-90 $250 $375 Seasonal Temporary Permit (Vendors) 3 Day 30-90 $250 $500 Guest Vendor/Short Term Food Event - prepackaged non-PHF only 1 Vendor 1 $546 $546
Guest Vendor/Short Term Food Event 1 Vendor 1 $546 $646 Guest Vendor/Short Term Food Event 2 Vendor 1 $546 $812 Guest Vendor/Short Term Food Event 3 Vendor 1 $546 $977 Nonprofit/Charitable TFF 1-3 Event 1 $0 $0
Itinerant Restaurant /TFF 1 Annual 1 $0 $668
Itinerant Restaurant /TFF 2 Annual 1 $0 $719
Itinerant Restaurant /TFF 3 Annual 1 $0 $755
Summer School Food - Annual Permit 1-3 Annual 1 $0 $250 Bed and Breakfast - Annual Permit 1 & 2 Annual 1 $432 $503 Cottage Food - Class A - Annual Permit 1 Annual 1 $170 $300 Cottage Food - Class B - Annual Permit 1 Annual 1 $425 $597 MEHKO - Annual Permit 1-3 Annual 1 $510 $603
MEHKO Application Fee/Plan Check (1 hr min) Hour 1 hr min $182 $250 Foragers/Gleaners 1 & 2 Annual 1 $0 $250
Congregate Living with Contracted Food Service 1 Sq ft 0-500 $432 $534 Congregate Living with Contracted Food Service 2 Sq ft 0-500 $432 $979 Congregate Living with Contracted Food Service 3 Sq ft 0-500 $432 $1,400 Congregate Living with Contracted Food Service - Add-on 1-3 Sq ft 500 $0 $112 Congregate Living with Contracted Food Service 4 Sq ft 0-500 $432 $1,367 Congregate Living with Contracted Food Service - Add-on 4 Sq ft 500 $0 $220 Shared-Use Facility Secondary Permit- Common Area/Equip OR Remote Storage (no Food Prep) 1-3 Facility 1 $0 $572
Shared-Use Facility Secondary Permit - Satellite or Remote Storage (ltd food prep/food removed from packaging) 1 Facility $0 $624 Shared-Use Facility Secondary Permit - Satellite 2 Facility $0 $851 Shared-Use Facility Kitchen Coordinator Permit 3 Facility 1 $0 $453 Limited-Service Charitable Food Operation 1 & 2 Annual 1 $0 $250 Food Bank/Donation Pantries 1 Annual 1 $0 $500

Page 10 of 16 ends

Page 418 ends

Environmental Health Division Fee Schedule
P a g e |5
Fee Title Risk
Category Unit Capacity Current
Fees
Proposed
Fees
Vending Machines 1 Machine up to 5 $52 $383
Vending Machines 2 Machine up to 5 $52 $402
Vending Machines 3 Machine up to 5 $52 $458
Vending Machines - Add-on 1-3 Machine up to 5 $52 $98
Food Safety Class (1 hr min) N/A 1 hour Actual $0 $250

RECREATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAM FEES
Fee Title Risk
Category Unit Capacity Current
Fees
Proposed
Fees
Seasonal Pool/Spa 1 Annual 1 $182-$704 $503
Seasonal Pool/Spa - Add-on 1 Annual 1 $0 $462
Seasonal Pool/Spa 2 Annual 1 $182-$704 $648
Seasonal Pool/Spa - Add-on 2 Annual 1 $0 $616
Seasonal Pool/Spa 3 Annual 1 $182-$704 $1,148
Seasonal Pool/Spa - Add-on 3 Annual 1 $0 $849
Year-Round Pool/Spa 1 Annual 1 $182-$704 $551
Year-Round Pool/Spa - Add-on 1 Annual 1 $0 $550
Year-Round Pool/Spa 2 Annual 1 $182-$704 $649
Year-Round Pool/Spa - Add-on 2 Annual 1 $0 $552
Year-Round Pool/Spa 3 Annual 1 $182-$704 $1,155
Year-Round Pool/Spa - Add-on 3 Annual 1 $0 $753

BODY ART PROGRAM FEES
Fee Title Risk
Category Unit Capacity Current
Fees
Proposed
Fees
Body Art Facility - Annual Permit N/A Annual 1 $366 $810 Body Art Practitioners - Annual Permit N/A Annual 1 $85 $300

CANNABIS FEES
Fee Title Risk
Category Unit Capacity Current
Fees
Proposed
Fees
Cannabis - Cultivation - Annual Permit N/A Sq ft 0-500 $704 $375 Cannabis - Distribution - Annual Permit N/A Sq ft 0-1,000 $355 $250

Page 11 of 16 ends

Page 419 ends

Environmental Health Division Fee Schedule
P a g e |6
Fee Title Risk
Category Unit Capacity Current
Fees
Proposed
Fees
Cannabis - Manufacturer - Edibles - Annual Permit - Annual Permit N/A Sq ft 0-500 $463 $375 Cannabis - Manufacturer - Non-volatile manufacturing - Annual Permit N/A Sq ft 0-500 $704 $375
Cannabis - Manufacturer - Volatile - Annual Permit N/A Sq ft 0-500 $704 $375 Cannabis - Retailer - Lounge - Annual Permit N/A Sq ft 0-500 $704 $250 Cannabis - Retailer - Non-Storefront - Annual Permit N/A Sq ft 0-1,000 $355 $125 Cannabis - Retailer - Storefront - Annual Permit N/A Sq ft 0-1,000 $355 $250 Cultivation, Manufacturing, and Lounge facilities: Add On - Annual N/A Sq ft 500 $46 $125 Cultivation, Manufacturing, and Lounge facilities: Add On - Annual N/A Sq ft 1000 $116 $125 Cannabis - Complaints/follow-up Inspections N/A 1/4 hour Actual $457 $500

NOISE-AMPLIFIED SOUND
Fee Title Risk
Category Unit Capacity Current
Fees
Proposed
Fees
Noise - Amplified Sound Permit (1-2 day event) N/A Event 1 $44 $250 Noise - Amplified Sound Permit - Add-on per day (3+) N/A Day 3 $75 $75 Noise-Amplified Sound Permit Variance N/A Event 1 $182 $500 Sound Survey - Onsite visit (3 hours min, 1/4 hr increments thereafter) N/A 1/4 hour Actual $340 $750
Sound Survey - Onsite visit After Business Hours (3 hours min, 1/4 hr increments thereafter) N/A 1/4 hour Actual $340 $911

PLAN CHECK
Fee Title Risk
Category Unit Capacity Current
Fees
Proposed
Fees
Plan Check-Structural Evaluation Review of Unpermitted Facility (1 hr min, 1/4 hr increments thereafter) N/A 1/4 hour Actual $170 $431 Plan Check Consultation (1/4 hr increments) N/A 1/4 hour Actual $45 $63 Plan Check - New Construction or Major remodel (4 hr min, 1/4 hr increments thereafter) N/A 1/4 hour 4 hr min $680 $1,494 Plan Check - Remodel or Retrofit Currently Permitted or Minor Project (2 hour min, 1/4 hr increments thereafter) N/A 1/4 hour 2 hr min $340 $871 Plan Check - Accelerated Add-on Fee (2 hr min) N/A Each 2 hr min $340 $430

Page 12 of 16 ends

Page 420 ends

Environmental Health Division Fee Schedule
P a g e |7
Fee Title Risk
Category Unit Capacity Current
Fees
Proposed
Fees
Plan Check -Equip/Menu/specs Review (1/2 hour minimum, 1/4 hr increments thereafter, each machine separately) N/A 1/4 hour 1/2 hr min $0 $125 Plan Check- food Automation/Robotics/Mechanized Prep (each machine separately N/A 1/4 hour Actual $0 $540

OTHER PROGRAMS
Fee Title Risk
Category Unit Capacity Current
Fees
Proposed
Fees
Tobacco - Annual Retail License N/A Annual 1 $498 $533
Facility Permit - Reprinting Fee N/A Each 1 $44 $44
Compost - Sanitary Requirements N/A Each ¼ hr $182 $62.50 Demolition Site Permits (1 hour min, 1/4 hr increments thereafter) N/A Each 1 $182 $250 Greywater/Rain Catch Basin (non-food, 4 hour min, 1/4 hr increments thereafter) N/A 1/4 hour Actual $680 $1,014
Water - Water Sampling - Non-City facilities N/A Facility 1 $182 $356 Lead - Contractor Verification (per job; exterior) N/A Each Actual $0 $525 Lead - Onsite XRF inspection (1/4 hr increments) N/A 1/4 hour Actual $0 $139

ENFORCEMENT/COMPLAINT
Fee Title Risk
Category Unit Capacity Current
Fees
Proposed
Fees
Investigation-Non-Food- No Valid Permit (1/4 hr increments) N/A 1/4 hour Actual $0 $484 Investigation - Food - No Valid Permit: up to 3 times annual permit fee N/A Each $0 $450
Admin Hearing (1 hour minimum, 1/4 hr increments thereafter) N/A 1/4 hour Actual $340 $250 Reinspection Fee (Enforcement, 1 hour min, 1/4 hr increments thereafter) N/A 1/4 hour Actual $130 $250
Re-Opening Facility following non-compliance closure (1 hour min, 1/4 hr increments thereafter) N/A 1/4 hour Actual $198 $250 Deposition/Expert Witness Fee N/A Each 1 $175 $175
Service in Excess of Standard (1/4 hr increments) N/A 1/4 hour Actual $119 $63 Enforcement/Follow-up Confirmed Complaint Investigation. For- Cause Reinspection (1/2 hr minimum, 1/4 hr increments thereafter) N/A 1/4 hour Actual $198 $125

Page 13 of 16 ends

Page 421 ends

Environmental Health Division Fee Schedule
P a g e |8

OTHER SERVICES
Fee Title Risk
Category Unit Capacity Current
Fees
Proposed
Fees
Food Facility - FOG Inspection N/A $0 $268
Food Facility - Stormwater Inspection: Chargeable Follow-up (1/4 hour min, 1/4 hr increments thereafter) N/A 1/4 hour Actual $0 $63 Healthy Check-out Program Visit (1/4 hr increments thereafter) N/A 1/4 hour Actual $0 $63

HOURLY RATES
Fee Title Risk
Category Unit Capacity Current
Fees
Proposed
Fees
EH Staff Hourly Rate N/A Hour Actual $170 $250

Page 14 of 16 ends

Page 422 ends

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

BERKELEY CITY COUNCIL

CHANGES TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH FEE SCHEDULE
The public may participate in this hearing by remote video or in-person.

Notice is hereby given by the City Council of the City of Berkeley that a public hearing will be conducted by said city council of the City of Berkeley at which time and place all persons may attend and be heard upon the following:

The Department of Health, Housing, and Community Services is proposing to increase permit and inspection fees for facilities in Berkeley under the jurisdiction of the City of Berkeley’s Environmental Health Division, including food program fees, recreation health program fees, body art program fees, cannabis fees, noise-amplified sound, plan check, enforcement/complaint, hourly rates, and other programs and services.

The hearing will be held on May 19, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. in the School District Board Room, located at 1231 Addison Street, Berkeley CA 94702.

For further information, please contact Scott Gilman, Department Director at 510-981- 5100.

A copy of the agenda material for this hearing will be available on the City’s website at https://berkeleyca.gov/ as of May 7, 2026. Once posted, the agenda for this meeting will include a link for public participation using Zoom video technology, as well as any health and safety requirements for in-person attendance.

Written comments should be mailed or delivered directly to the City Clerk, 2180 Milvia Street, Berkeley, CA 94704, or e-mailed to
[email protected] in order to ensure
delivery to all Councilmembers and inclusion in the agenda packet.

Communications to the Berkeley City Council are public record and will become part of the City’s electronic records, which are accessible through the City’s website. Please note: e-mail addresses, names, addresses, and other contact information are not required, but if included in any communication to the City Council, will become part of the public record. If you do not want your e-mail address or any other contact information to be made public, you may deliver communications via U.S. Postal Service or in person to the City Clerk. If you do not want your contact information included in the public record, please do not include that information in your communication. Please contact the City Clerk at (510) 981-6900 or [email protected] for further information.

If you challenge the above in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Berkeley at, or prior to, the public hearing.

Background information concerning this proposal will be available at the City Clerk Department and posted on the City of Berkeley webpage at least 12 days prior to the public hearing.

Page 15 of 16 ends

Page 423 ends

Published: May 1 and May 8, 2026 – The Berkeley Voice
Published pursuant to Government Code Section 6062a
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I hereby certify that the Notice for this Public Hearing of the Berkeley City Council was posted at the display case located near the walkway in front of the Maudelle Shirek Building, 2134 Martin Luther King Jr. Way, as well as on the City’s website, on May 7, 2026.

Mark Numainville, City Clerk

Page 16 of 16 ends

Page 424 ends

Office of the City Manager
2180 Milvia Street, Berkeley, CA 94704 ● Tel: (510) 981-7000 ● TDD: (510) 981-6903 ● Fax: (510) 981-7099 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: https://berkeleyca.gov/

PUBLIC HEARING
June 9, 2026
(Continued from May 19, 2026)
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Paul Buddenhagen, City Manager
Submitted by: Wahid Amiri, Interim Director, Public Works Subject: Repeal and Reenact Berkeley Municipal Code (BMC) Chapter 14.52 to Adjust the goBerkeley Parking Management Program; Change Parking Permit Fees; Establish a New Schedule for Parking Violations, Fines, and Late Payment Penalties; and Rescind Resolution No. 71,627-N.S.

RECOMMENDATION
Conduct a public hearing and upon conclusion:

1. Adopt first reading of an Ordinance repealing and reenacting Berkeley Municipal Code chapter 14.52, “Parking Meters,” to enable the following changes:
a. Extend parking meter operating hours to 8 p.m. citywide; b. Operate parking meters, pay stations, and parking enforcement on Sundays.
c. Expand meter zones to new high-demand areas (refer to Attachment 1, Exhibit A);
d. Authorize a transition to cashless parking meters and/or pay stations in the future; and

2. Adopt a Resolution to pass through parking meter costs currently paid by the City to a transparent transaction charge paid by the customer; and

3. Adopt a Resolution implementing a new FY 2028 fee schedule for Residential Parking Permit fees; and

4. Adopt a Resolution updating the Schedule of Parking Violations and Fines; and rescinding Resolution No. 71,627-N.S. (Parking Violations and Fines).

SUMMARY
Following the implementation of near-term strategies in March and April 2026, the Public Works Department has identified that further adjustments are necessary to update fees and citation amounts to keep pace with City costs to administer parking programs. Such changes will also serve to manage parking in high-demand commercial districts, and to improve the solvency of the Off-Street and Parking Meter Funds. These changes align with the City’s goals for the goBerkeley Parking Management Program, including:
1) Making it easier to find a parking space near popular destinations;

Page 1 of 518 ends

Page 425 ends

Repeal and Reenact Berkeley Municipal Code (BMC) Chapter 14.52 to Adjust the goBerkeley Parking Management Program; Change Parking Permit Fees; Establish a New Schedule for Parking Violations, Fines, and Late Payment Penalties; and Rescind Resolution No. 71,627-N.S. PUBLIC HEARING June 9, 2026

Page 2 ends

2) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" while looking for parking.
3) Increasing "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants; and
4) Improving safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double-parking.

FISCAL IMPACTS OF RECOMMENDATION
As shown in Table 1 (see following page), the recommendations herein are anticipated to result in additional annual revenue of about $ 7,058,000, or a net increase of approximately $4,939,000 after accounting for new costs and cost savings.

Recommendations 1.a. to 2 would result in a net increase of about $1,453,000 to the Parking Meter Fund, and recommendations 3 and 4 are anticipated to result in an increase in revenue of about $3,486,000 to the General Fund. While all program changes will start implementation early in FY 2027, the exact timing of revenue realization remains subject to some uncertainty. New revenue is expected to begin incrementally in the second half of FY 2027 before ramping up more significantly thereafter.

Page 2 of 518 ends

Page 426 ends

Page 3 ends

Table 1: Fiscal Impacts of Recommendations
Recommendation New Cost New
Revenue
Cost
Savings
Net
Change

1.a. Extend parking meter
operating hours to 8 p.m.
citywide
$1,001,0001 $1,504,000 N/A $503,000

1.b. Operate parking meters,
pay stations, and parking
enforcement on Sundays
$1,297,0002 $1,429,000 N/A $132,000

1.c. Expand meter zones to
new high-demand areas $322,0003 $639,0004 N/A $317,000

1.d. Authorize a transition to
cashless parking meters
and/or pay stations in the
future
N/A N/A $95,0005 $95,000

2. Pass through parking
meter costs currently paid by
the City to a transparent
transaction charge paid by
the customer
N/A N/A $406,0006 $406,000

3. Increase Residential
Parking Permit (RPP) fees for
FY2028
N/A $615,0007 N/A $615,000

4. Update the Schedule of
Parking Violations and Fines N/A $2,871,0008 N/A $2,871,000 TOTAL $2,257,000 $7,058,0009 $501,000 $5,302,000
NOTES
1 Assumes 572 additional enforcement hours per year (2 hours per day, 6 days per week, 52 weeks per year, less 11 parking meter holidays). The projected increase in parking enforcement costs is driven by the recruitment of additional officers, though the specific number of new positions and timing of hiring remains to be determined. 2 Assumes 613 additional enforcement hours per year to operate meters from 9 am to 8 pm on Sundays (11 additional hours per week, 52 weeks per year). Includes a one- time capital cost for six Parking Enforcement Officer Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) units. While additional citation revenue generated by this expanded enforcement capacity will accrue to the General Fund, it is excluded from this table due to the inherent variability in potential enforcement outcomes and operations. 3 Includes one-time capital costs of $296,000 plus ongoing operational service fees representing $25,920 annually.
4Assumes all new blocks would have 65% occupancy.
5 Includes cost savings from eliminating cash handling fees, less maintenance, fewer parts and vehicles. Does not include labor savings, but 5 FTE staff are currently employed as parking meter coin collectors. Staff would be reassigned to cover

Page 3 of 518 ends

Page 427 ends

Page 4 ends

emergent needs in the City. The timing of this is not yet known, and therefore labor savings within these funds are not included in this table. 6 Annual service and transaction fees paid to IPS Group, Inc. are about $456,000.

Despite the shift to transparent transaction charges, the City would still owe a reduced annual service fee that is estimated at $50,000. New transaction charges are listed as “Cost Savings” in this table because new revenue from this change would go to the parking meter vendor, IPS Group, Inc., instead of the City. As shown in Table 2, cost savings and new revenue from these measures still do not completely cover City costs associated with administering parking programs.
7 Calculated by multiplying the number of active 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc. permits by proposed FY 2028 fees. Revenue from other permit types was calculated by multiplying the average revenue for each permit type between FY 2021 to FY 2024 by the new FY 2028 fees.
8 Increased fines are necessary to restore deterrence and recover enforcement costs.

Therefore, fine amounts were adjusted to reflect cumulative inflation since 2010 based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which is between a 3-49% increase for each fine type depending on when the fine was last updated. 9 These revenue figures are intentionally conservative and reflect only 80% of the estimated new revenue. The reduction is meant to account for unforeseen circumstances.

As shown in Figure 1 (following page), the combined parking fund balance is projected to reach a negative deficit by the end of FY 2027 and would continue declining if the recommended adjustments to the goBerkeley program are not implemented.

Page 4 of 518 ends

Page 428 ends

Page 5 ends

Figure 1: Combined Parking Fund Balance with No Action (FY 2025 - FY 2031) As shown in Figure 2 (following page), implementing the recommendations herein increases Parking Meter Fund revenue and decreases costs, changing the trajectory of the combined parking fund balance starting in FY 2028. In the figure, half of the projected net new revenue from recommendations 1.a and 1.b would be realized in FY 2027 with the full amount anticipated to be realized in FY 2028. Half of the net new revenue from recommendation 1.c is projected to occur in FY 2028, with the full amount expected in FY 2029. Cost savings from recommendation 1.d are anticipated to occur in FY 2029, and all of the cost savings from recommendation 2 are anticipated to occur in FY 2027.
-$3,403,
640
-$5,320,276
-$7,130,173
-$9,050,
130
-$11,089,029
-$13,256,294
-$15,561,921
$4,753,
127
$5,768,
429
$4,143,275
$3,320,
330$3,078,710 $3,010,
563 $2,807,
674
$1,349,486 $448,153
-$821,
860
-$2,393,185 -$3,425,
014
-$4,329,
176
-$5,418,
155
-$20,000,000
-$15,000,000
-$10,000,000
-$5,000,
000
$0
$5,000,
000
$10,000,000
FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31
Off-Street Fund (627) Balance Parking
Meter Fund (631) Balance
Combined Fund Balan
ce

Page 5 of 518 ends

Page 429 ends

Page 6 ends

Figure 2: Combined Parking Fund Balance with Implementation of All Recommended Strategies (FY 2025 – FY 2031)

CURRENT SITUATION AND ITS EFFECTS
This report covers three primary changes to the City’s parking program:

1. Adjustments to the goBerkeley program to address parking demand, modernize parking infrastructure, and reduce operational costs;

2. Updates to the Residential Parking Permit fees to cover City costs from administering the program and to reflect the City’s environmental priorities; and

3. Updates to the Schedule of Parking Violations and Fines. goBerkeley Adjustments
When combined, the City’s Parking Meter and Off-Street Parking Funds are currently facing a projected structural deficit, necessitating a transition toward more sustainable and technologically modern management models. Recent data indicates that parking demand in Berkeley’s commercial cores remains high during evenings and on Sundays—periods when meters are currently inactive. This lack of active management results in high occupancy, which discourages vehicle turnover, harms local business access, and increases "cruising" for spaces, a major contributor to localized traffic congestion and greenhouse gas emissions.

Furthermore, the operational maintenance of the City's aging parking infrastructure is increasingly inefficient; mechanical coin operators and receipt printers are the primary -$3,403,
640
-$5,320,276
-$7,130,173
-$9,050,
130
-$11,089,029
-$13,256,294
-$15,561,921
$4,753,
127$5,768,429$6,434,
333$7,903,079
$10,098,584
$12,768,923
$15,407,873
$1,349,486 $448,153 -$695,840-$1,147,
051-$990,
445 -$487,
372 -$154,
048
-$20,000,000
-$15,000,000
-$10,000,000
-$5,000,
000
$0
$5,000,
000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31
Off-Street Fund (627) Balance Parking Meter Fund (631) Balance Combined Fund Balance

Page 6 of 518 ends

Page 430 ends

Page 7 ends

point of failure for pay stations, and the manual collection of physical currency requires significant staff resources and armored transport costs. Currently, the City absorbs credit card processing fees for every transaction through a parking meter, which directly erodes the net revenue of the Parking Meter Fund and is inconsistent with the customer-paid “convenience fee” model used by the City’s mobile parking vendor, ParkMobile. By extending meter hours, expanding zones to unmanaged high-demand areas, and transitioning to a cashless, transparent cost-based model, the City can reduce operational overhead, stabilize the parking funds, and ensure that the cost of curb management is borne by users rather than being subsidized.

The revenue generated from parking meters is no longer sufficient to fully cover the costs of the Police Department’s Parking Enforcement unit, including the maintenance of enforcement vehicles, cost of labor, costs of License Plate Recognition (LPR) technology, Public Works operational costs, or the annual debt service costs (approximately $1.9 million) for the Center Street Garage reconstruction. Increasing revenue for the Parking Meter Fund provides the necessary cost recovery to maintain a robust parking management program.

Regional and National Comparison
San Francisco operates the most robust evening and weekend program in the region, with meters in high-traffic zones like Fisherman's Wharf and the Embarcadero running until 10 p.m. and on Sundays. Walnut Creek also operates meters until 8 p.m., including Sundays; and Oakland began operating parking meters on Sundays in January 2026.

Outside of the Bay Area, other cities such as Sacramento, Los Angeles, Seattle, Washington D.C., and Chicago operate parking meters until 8 p.m. or later.

Equity Considerations
To mitigate potential barriers for unbanked or underbanked individuals who may be inconvenienced by the transition to a cashless parking environment, the new cashless pay stations would integrate Clipper card functionality into all new tap-to-pay parking hardware. Because Clipper cards can be replenished with physical currency at numerous retail locations and Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) stations, they serve as a vital "cash-to-digital" bridge. This approach preserves the operational benefits of a cashless system—such as eliminating mechanical coin- or printer-jams and reducing manual cash processing costs—while ensuring that the public right-of-way remains accessible to all community members, regardless of their access to traditional banking or credit services.

Currently, the City employs five full-time staff members as parking meter collectors who are responsible for the collection and processing of cash from nearly 2,200 meters and pay stations. As the program transitions to cashless technology over a projected three- to-five-year period, these job descriptions will evolve to reflect the diminishing need for manual cash handling. If Public Works observes that these positions are no longer

Page 7 of 518 ends

Page 431 ends

Page 8 ends

necessary, affected staff would be reassigned to other roles within Public Works or the City.

Recommendations and Implementation
The implementation strategies for Staff’s recommended goBerkeley adjustments are in Table 2, below.

Table 2: Recommended goBerkeley Adjustments and Implementation Strategies Recommendation Implementation Strategy

1.a. Extend parking meter operating
hours to 8 p.m. citywide

1.b. Operate parking meters, pay
stations, and parking enforcement on
Sundays citywide (9 a.m. to 8 p.m.)
Move to 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. meter operation and
enforcement citywide. Replace signs in early
FY 2027, starting with the areas with highest
demand. Begin with a 30-day educational
period in the first half of FY 2027 where only
warning citations may be issued.

1.c. Expand meter zones to new high-
demand areas
Install approximately 36 new pay stations in
high-demand commercial areas currently
lacking meters. Refer to Attachment 1, Exhibit
A, for a list of expansion locations and their
parking demand.

1.d. Authorize a transition to cashless
parking meters and/or pay stations in
the future
Replace aging hardware with units that accept
Tap-to-Pay only (continue to offer mobile
payment in all paid parking areas citywide.

Begin with pilot unit on one block and survey
users after one month of testing. If feedback is
positive, replace all pay stations gradually
citywide, one district at a time.

2. Pass through parking meter costs
currently paid by the City to a
transparent transaction charge paid by
the customer
Replace the City-absorbed meter transaction
costs for credit card purchases to a customer-
paid service charge to accurately reflect the
true costs to the City of providing parking
management services. Transition to occur on a
Sunday in early FY 2027. Transaction charge
will be displayed on the screen prior to
payment for transparency providing customers
with the opportunity to cancel a transaction
prior to paying.

The parking meter hour extension and Sunday paid parking would be rolled out via a strategic "soft launch" designed to prioritize public education and community awareness, starting with locations with the highest demand for parking. Following the formal start of operations, a one-month grace period would be established to allow

Page 8 of 518 ends

Page 432 ends

Page 9 ends

residents and visitors to adjust to the updated regulations. During this transitional phase, the City’s parking enforcement team may issue non-punitive warning citations rather than financial penalties, ensuring that drivers are clearly informed of the new hours and days of operation. A consultant will evaluate the Police Department’s parking enforcement staffing resources and capabilities during the initial implementation phase to provide recommendations for the optimal utilization of personnel moving forward.

Residential Parking Permit Fees
The Residential Parking Permit Program (RPP) was established to protect neighborhood quality of life, yet it currently faces a significant funding gap. Total program expenses are driven primarily by the personnel costs of 21 Parking Enforcement Officers and 3 supervisors, as well as administrative staff from Public Works, Finance, and the 311 call center. Total RPP expenses are estimated at approximately $4.12 million annually. Historically, however, RPP revenue, including citation revenue in RPP zones, has averaged only $2.85 million, leaving an estimated $1.3 million deficit that must be subsidized by the Parking Meter Fund and General Fund. Clearly, the fee structure must be modernized to reflect the true costs to the City of administering the Residential Parking Permit Program.

The current "flat-fee" structure also fails to address the environmental and equity impacts of excessive vehicle storage on public streets. Households that utilize the public right-of-way for three or more vehicles currently pay the same per-permit rate as those with only one vehicle, despite occupying a disproportionate amount of limited curb space. By transitioning to a graduated fee scale—where the first permit is more affordable than the 3rd permit for vehicles at a single address—the City can encourage residents to utilize off-street parking where available, reduce the "privatization" of public space for long-term car storage, and move the RPP program closer to its goal of being a self-supporting enterprise.

The recommended fee increases (see Table 3 on following page) would go into effect on May 1, 2027, the first day residents can purchase their FY 2028 RPP permits.

Page 9 of 518 ends

Page 433 ends

Page 10 ends

Table 3: Recommended FY 2028 RPP Permit Fees
Permit type FY 2027
(Current Year) FY 2028
Annual Residential & In-Home Care (3 per
address) $85
$100 first permit
$125 second permit
$150 third permit
Semi-Annual Residential & In-Home Care (3
per address) $42
$50 first permit
$63 second permit
$75 third permit
Surcharge per Additional Annual or Semi-
Annual Residential Permit, if Waiver
Approved
$100
$150 base fee
(equal to third permit
fee) + $125
surcharge
Child Care $83 $100
1-Day Visitor $4 $5
14-Day Visitor $44 $55
Neighborhood Serving Community Facility $90 $105
1-Day Senior Center $4 $5
Merchant $190 $195
Schedule of Parking Violations and Fines
The City’s Schedule of Parking Violations and Fines has not been comprehensively adjusted to keep pace with the rising costs of enforcement and regional inflation. While minor modifications to the schedule have been made recently based on changes to the California Vehicle Code, the fine amounts for some of the most common citations—such as expired meters or street sweeping—have not been increased in over 15 years.

Currently, the City’s fine amounts for many common violations are significantly lower than those of neighboring jurisdictions, which diminishes the deterrent effect of a citation. For example, a citation for an expired meter in Berkeley is currently $43, whereas the same violation is $64 in Oakland and as high as $108 in high-demand areas of San Francisco. Similarly, Berkeley’s street sweeping fine is $49, compared to $72 in Oakland and $97 in San Francisco. As shown in Attachment 4, Exhibit A, the recommendation herein would increase the City’s parking fines commensurate with cumulative inflation that has occurred since the last time each parking fine was increased. For most violation types, the last update was in 2010, and each of these fines are increased by 49%. However, some violation types were added to the Schedule of Parking Violations and Fines more recently, for example in 2012, 2018, 2023, and 2024, and therefore these fine amounts are increased by less. Increasing fine amounts to keep pace with inflation results in increases of between 3% to 49%, or in practical

Page 10 of 518 ends

Page 434 ends

Page 11 ends

terms, an expired meter fine of $64 and a street sweeping fine of $73, which still keeps Berkeley under San Francisco’s fine amounts.

Public Outreach/Survey
In early March 2026, the City released a public survey regarding potential adjustments to the parking management program, which was accompanied by a community message released by the City’s Communications team. The survey received 669 responses, equivalent to 33.5 hours of public comment. The survey results are included as Attachment 5 and summarized below.

A majority of respondents (over 50%) expressed agreement or strong agreement with each of the core objectives of the goBerkeley program, specifically:
 Improving parking availability near popular destinations.  Reducing greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing vehicle "circling."  Increasing vehicle turnover to support local economic vitality and merchant access.
 Enhancing safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing double-parking and distracted driving.

Feedback regarding proposed operational shifts was more closely divided, with sentiment leaning toward opposition for the following:
 Evening Meter Hours: 53% oppose vs. 36% support.
 Sunday Operations: 49% oppose vs. 43% support.
 Geographic Expansion: 44% oppose vs. 38% support.

There is decisive public support for infrastructure updates; 70% of respondents favor the transition to Tap-to-Pay hardware and the integration of Clipper cards as a cash- accessible alternative, while 17% are opposed.

Respondents showed moderate support for cost transparency, with 47% in favor and 33% opposed to the proposal for a transparent $0.25–$0.35 service charge.

Overall, managing parking demand and ensuring the solvency of the parking funds is consistent with the City’s Strategic Plan, advancing our goals to provide state-of-the-art, well-maintained infrastructure, amenities, and facilities; and to provide an efficient and financially healthy City government.

BACKGROUND
The City’s parking management program includes three main components

1. goBerkeley: the data-driven, demand-responsive parking management program consisting of parking meters in commercial areas, three City-owned garages, and two surface parking lots: one in the Elmwood district and the other near the intersection of Alcatraz Ave and Adeline Street;

Page 11 of 518 ends

Page 435 ends

Page 12 ends

2. The Residential Parking Permit Program: a neighborhood management system designed to prioritize curb space for residents and/or their caretakers, merchants, and institutional employees while protecting neighborhoods from overwhelming parking demand from visitors or commuters; and

3. Parking Enforcement: a dedicated team of 21 specialized officers, two supervisors, and one manager who utilizes License Plate Recognition technology in parking enforcement vehicles to systematically monitor and enforce parking regulations.
goBerkeley Adjustments
The goBerkeley Parking Program was established to manage the City’s limited curb space through demand-responsive pricing, ensuring that residents, visitors, and customers can find available parking in or near commercial districts. On January 27, 2026, the City Council approved a series of "near-term" strategies—implemented on March 1, 2026, for on-street meters and April 1, 2026, for City garages—to start to address a structural deficit in the Parking Meter Fund (631) and the Off-Street Parking Fund (627). Despite these initial adjustments, both funds remain under pressure due to the high cost of maintaining aging hardware and the evolving driving patterns of a post- pandemic economy.

Currently, the City operates approximately 1,945 single-space meters and 242 multi- space pay stations. These aging units frequently require mechanical repairs due to printer and coin jams; and the manual collection of physical currency requires specialized personnel and secure transport. Transitioning to a cashless system represents the next phase of the goBerkeley roadmap, aimed at reducing "down-time" and unnecessary cost.

Parking meters are a strategy for managing the curb as a finite public resource. The goBerkeley program has been extended to different hours of the day and new commercial areas in the past where parking availability and turnover are critical for customer access and convenience. As shown in Attachment 1, Exhibit A, in the absence of pricing, many blocks without meters exceed 85% occupancy during the day, which effectively blocks access for short-term visitors, delivery drivers, and customers.

Introducing meters encourages vehicle turnover, ensuring that a consistent number of spaces (one to two per block) remain available throughout the day. This improved accessibility is vital for the economic health of a district, as it significantly reduces "cruising," the process where drivers circle blocks searching for parking. Cruising is a major contributor to localized traffic congestion and greenhouse gas emissions. By pricing the curb to match demand, the City can decrease unnecessary vehicle miles traveled while ensuring that the public right-of-way supports the needs of local businesses and the environment.

Page 12 of 518 ends

Page 436 ends

Page 13 ends

Residential Parking Permit Fees
The RPP program was instituted in 1980 to: protect City residential neighborhoods from an influx of non-resident vehicles and related traffic; and to assure continued quality of life for residents. The RPP program limits parking for vehicles without valid permits in most areas to two hours and reserves available daytime parking for residents or other permit-holders, from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday, and on some blocks, Saturday.

On June 24, 2025, City Council approved increasing RPP Program fees for the FY 2027 permit year to make progress in addressing the gap between RPP Program revenue and expenses (Resolution No. 71,839-N.S. Regarding Preferential Parking Program Permit Fees). However, to achieve full cost recovery and align with the City’s environmental goals, a more sophisticated structure is required. The proposed graduated fee scale for FY 2028 recognizes that the public right-of-way is a finite resource; by increasing the cost for households with three or more vehicles, the City seeks to encourage the use of off-street parking and reduce the long-term storage of private vehicles on public streets, thereby supporting Berkeley's Climate Action Plan goals.

Schedule of Parking Violations and Fines
Parking fines and late penalties are a critical tool for ensuring compliance with the City’s parking regulations and recovering the cost of administering the City’s parking programs. Berkeley’s fine schedule has remained largely static for the last 15 years while nearby cities have adjusted theirs to account for inflation and the rising costs of enforcement equipment, including vehicles and License Plate Reader technology.

The current fine for an expired meter in Berkeley ($43) is significantly lower than in Oakland ($64) or San Francisco (up to $108), creating a "compliance gap" where the financial penalty is no longer a sufficient deterrent against overstaying time limits. This leads to reduced compliance with parking regulations and lower parking revenue collection.

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE IMPACTS
In general, parking supports driving by dedicating curb space to car storage rather than alternative modes such as transit, walking, or biking. Free parking encourages overuse, while charging fees for parking and enforcing parking regulations are the most effective ways to manage demand. Lower demand for parking signals fewer vehicle trips overall, resulting in reduced fuel consumption and congestion caused by drivers circling the block searching for parking. Moreover, fewer vehicle trips represents a shift toward sustainable alternatives such as walking, biking, or taking public transit, which improves air quality and lowers greenhouse gas emissions.

This action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines § 15301 because the proposed adjustments to the goBerkeley

Page 13 of 518 ends

Page 437 ends

Page 14 ends

Parking Management Program, including extending meter hours, initiating Sunday operations, expanding meter zones, revising Residential Parking Permit fees, updating the parking violations schedule, and authorizing a transition to cashless parking meters, involve the operation, maintenance, and minor alteration of existing public facilities (including parking meters, pay stations, signage, and curbside regulations) without expanding their physical footprint or capacity. Further, as regulatory measures designed to maintain and protect environmental resources by reducing vehicle circling, lowering greenhouse gas emissions, and improving curbside management, these changes are also exempt under CEQA Guidelines § 15307 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of Natural Resources). Additionally, the program updates constitute regulatory actions intended to ensure proper enforcement of parking regulations, improve compliance, and reduce environmental and traffic impacts, which are categorically exempt under §15308 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment).

RATIONALE FOR RECOMMENDATION
This recommendation would align parking meter and permit fees with the cost of administering the Parking Management Program and the Residential Parking Permit programs, respectively. These strategies would ensure program costs are adequately covered including capital renewal and debt service. Without these measures, the City would not be able to administer these programs effectively because the combined parking fund balance is projected to be in deficit by approximately $1,000,000 at the end of FY 2027. As shown in Figure 1, above, with implementation of these measures, the combined Parking Fund balance is projected to be about $1,610,000 by the end of FY 2027.

ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS CONSIDERED
Staff considered other strategies such as advertising opportunities and reusing garages for other uses besides parking but determined these strategies would require additional personnel or capital investment and will be explored further in the future. Staff continue to evaluate the parking programs and their assets and expect to bring periodic recommendations to Council in the future.

CONTACT PERSON
Mark Helmbrecht, Transportation Manager, Public Works, (510) 981-6403 Scott Artis, Parking Services Manager, Public Works, (510) 981-7786 Elliott Schwimmer, Senior Planner, Public Works, (510) 981-7066 Attachments:
1: Ordinance:

Repeal and reenact Berkeley municipal code chapter 14.52 to extend meter operating hours to 8 p.m. citywide; operate parking meters on Sundays; allow parking meters in new high-demand areas; and authorize a transition to cashless parking meters.

Page 14 of 518 ends

Page 438 ends

Page 15 ends

2. Resolution:

Directing the City Manager to Transition from City-Absorbed Parking Meter Transaction Costs to a Transparent Transaction Charge Paid by the Customer.

3. Resolution:

Adopting a New Fee Structure and Updating Fees for the Residential Parking Permit (RPP) Program to Achieve Cost Recover and Advance City Environmental Goals

4. Resolution:

Adopting and Updated Schedule of Fines and Late Payment Penalties for Parking Violations to Ensure Regional Alignment, Cost Recovery, and Enforcement Efficacy

5. Parking Survey Results

6. Public Hearing Notice

Page 15 of 518 ends

Page 439 ends

Page 16 of 518 ends

Page 440 ends

ORDINANCE NO. -N.S.

REPEAL AND REENACT BERKELEY MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 14.52 TO EXTEND METER OPERATING HOURS TO 8 P.M. CITYWIDE; OPERATE PARKING METERS ON SUNDAYS; ALLOW PARKING METERS IN NEW HIGH-DEMAND AREAS; AND AUTHORIZE A TRANSITION TO CASHLESS PARKING METERS BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Berkeley as follows:

Section 1. That Berkeley Municipal Code Chapter 14.52 is repealed and reenacted to read as follows:

14.52.010 Parking meter zones.

A. goBerkeley Program parking meter zones are those streets or portions of streets in the City located within the goBerkeley Areas hereinafter described as zones within which the parking of motor vehicles shall be controlled, regulated and inspected with the aid of parking meters, pay stations, and/or a City-approved software application that processes pay-by-phone payments from a mobile phone at fees set in 14.52.120:

Acton Street, both sides, from 150 feet north of University Avenue to University Avenue.

Addison Street, both sides, from Oxford Street to Martin Luther King Jr. Way.

Addison Street, north side, from Martin Luther King Jr. Way to 170 feet west of Martin Luther King Jr. Way.

Addison Street, north side, from Second Street to the Union Pacific Rail Right of Way.

Addison Street, south side, from Bonar Street to West Street.

Adeline Street, east side, from Ward Street to Essex Street.

Adeline Street, west side, from Russell Street to Ashby Avenue.

Alcatraz Avenue, south side, from 75 feet east of College Avenue to College Avenue.

Allston Way, both sides, from Oxford Street to Martin Luther King Jr. Way.

Ashby Avenue, both sides, from Domingo Avenue to Claremont Avenue.

Ashby Avenue, north side, from College Avenue to Benvenue Avenue.

Ashby Avenue, south side, from Benvenue Avenue to Elmwood Avenue.

Ashby Place, east side, from Ashby Avenue to a point 80 feet north of Ashby Avenue.

Bancroft Way, both sides, from Piedmont Avenue to Milvia Street.

Benvenue Avenue, west side, from Ashby Avenue to 100 feet south of Ashby Avenue.

Berkeley Square, both sides, from Addison Street to Center Street.

Page 17 of 518 ends

Page 441 ends

Berkeley Way, north side, from Oxford Street to Shattuck Avenue.

Berkeley Way, south side, from Oxford Street to 385 feet west of Shattuck Avenue.

Blake Street, both sides, from Telegraph Avenue to 125 feet west of Telegraph Avenue.

Blake Street, south side, from Shattuck Avenue to 80 feet west of Shattuck Avenue.

Bonar Street, east side, from University Avenue to 150 feet south of University Avenue.

Bonar Street, west side, from University Avenue to Addison Street.

Bonita Avenue, east side, from University Avenue to Berkeley Way.

Bowditch Street, east side, from Bancroft Way to Dwight Way.

California Street, both sides, from 100 feet north of University Avenue to 100 feet south of University Avenue.

California Street, both sides, from Ada Street to Hopkins Street.

Camelia Street, north side, from Tenth Street to Ninth Street.

Camelia Street, north side, from San Pablo Avenue to 100 feet west of San Pablo Avenue.

Center Street, both sides, from Oxford Street to Martin Luther King Jr. Way.

Channing Way, north side, from Shattuck Avenue to 250 feet west of Shattuck Avenue.

Channing Way, north side, from College Avenue to Dana Street.

Claremont Avenue, east side, from Russell Street to Ashby Avenue.

Claremont Avenue, west side, from Russell Street to Claremont Boulevard.

Colby Street, west side, from Webster Street to South Hospital Drive.

College Avenue, east side, from Bancroft Way to 200 feet south of Dwight Way.

College Avenue, west side, from Bancroft Way to Dwight Way.

College Avenue, east side, from 75 feet south of Webster Street to 175 feet north of Russell Street.

College Avenue, west side, from 140 feet north of Russell Street to Webster Street.

College Avenue, east side, from 150 feet north of Alcatraz Avenue to Berkeley-Oakland city limits south of Alcatraz Avenue.

College Avenue, west side, from Alcatraz Avenue to Berkeley-Oakland city limit, south of Alcatraz Avenue.

Colusa Avenue, east side, from Catalina Avenue to 225 feet south of Solano Avenue Colusa Avenue, west side, from Catalina Avenue to 180 feet south of Solano Avenue.

Curtis Street, both sides, from 100 feet north of University Avenue to University Avenue.

Page 18 of 518 ends

Page 442 ends

Dana Street, both sides, from Bancroft Way to Channing Way.

Dana Street, west side, from Haste Street to 150 feet south of Haste Street.

Delaware Street, south side, from 60 feet east of Shattuck Avenue to Shattuck Avenue.

Derby Street, north side, from 150 feet east of Telegraph Avenue to 50 feet west of Telegraph Avenue.

Derby Street, south side, from 150 feet east of Telegraph Avenue to Telegraph Avenue.

Derby Street, south side, from 300 feet east of Milvia Street to Milvia Street.

Domingo Avenue, both sides, from Berkeley-Oakland city limit to Ashby Avenue.

Durant Avenue, both sides, from Fulton Street to Milvia Street.

Durant Avenue, both sides, from College Avenue to Ellsworth Street.

Dwight Way, both sides, from Fulton Street to Milvia Street.

Dwight Way, north side, from 300 feet east of Telegraph Avenue to 300 feet east of Dana Street.

Dwight Way, north side, from College Avenue to Bowditch Street.

Dwight Way, south side, from 125 feet east of Regent Street to 325 feet west of Telegraph Avenue.

Dwight Way, south side, from Benvenue Avenue to Hillegass Avenue.

Dwight Way, north side, from 40 feet east of San Pablo Avenue to San Pablo Avenue.

Eighth Street, west side, from 100 feet north of University Avenue to 200 feet south of University Avenue.

Eighth Street, both sides, from Carleton Street to Pardee Street.

Ensenada Avenue, east side, from 66 feet north of Solano Avenue to 90 feet south of Solano Avenue.

Euclid Avenue, east side, from 135 feet north of Ridge Road to Hearst Avenue.

Euclid Avenue, west side, from 130 feet north of Ridge Road to Hearst Avenue.

Fifth Street, west side, from Virginia Street to Hearst Avenue.

Fifth Street, both sides, from Hearst Avenue to Addison Street.

Fifth Street, west side, from Virginia Street to Delaware Street.

Fifth Street, both sides, from Delaware Street to Hearst Avenue.

Fifth Street, both sides, from Hearst Avenue to University Avenue.

Fourth Street, east side, from Virginia Street to Addison Street.

Fourth Street, west side, from Cedar Street to Addison Street.

Page 19 of 518 ends

Page 443 ends

Francisco Street, both sides, from Shattuck Avenue to 100 feet west of Shattuck Avenue.

Fresno Avenue, east side, from Solano Avenue to 69 feet south of Solano Avenue.

Fulton Street, both sides, from Kittredge Street to Bancroft Way.

Fulton Street, east side, from Bancroft Way to Durant Avenue.

Fulton Street, west side, beginning at Durant Avenue and extending south for 80 feet.

Grant Street, both sides, from 100 feet north of University Avenue to 100 feet south of University Avenue.

Grayson Street, south side, from San Pablo Avenue to 60 feet west of San Pablo Avenue.

Harold Way, both sides, from Allston Way to Kittredge Street.

Haste Street, both sides, from 250 feet east of Shattuck Avenue to Milvia Street.

Haste Street, north side, from College Avenue to Dana Street.

Haste Street, south side, from 300 feet east of Telegraph Avenue to 350 feet west of Telegraph Avenue.

Haste Street, south side, from College Avenue to Bowditch Street.

Hearst Avenue, north side, from LaLoma Avenue to Scenic Avenue.

Hearst Avenue, south side, from Euclid Avenue to Gayley Road.

Hearst Avenue, south side, from Oxford Street to Arch Street.

Hearst Avenue, both sides, from Oxford Street to Shattuck Avenue.

Hearst Avenue, north side, from Fifth Street to Third Street.

Hearst Avenue, south side, from Sixth Street to Third Street.

Heinz Avenue, both sides, from Seventh Street to Ninth Street.

Hopkins Street, both sides, from Monterey Avenue to McGee Avenue.

Hopkins Street, both sides, from Hopkins Court to Monterey Avenue.

Kittredge Street, both sides, from Oxford Street to Milvia Street.

La Loma Avenue, both sides, from Ridge Road to Hearst Avenue.

LeRoy Avenue, both sides, from Ridge Road to Hearst Avenue.

Lincoln Street, south side, from Shattuck Avenue to 150 feet west of Shattuck Avenue.

Martin Luther King Jr. Way, both sides, from Addison Street to Allston Way.

Martin Luther King Jr. Way, both sides, from Alcatraz to 63rd Street.

Milvia Street, both sides, from Berkeley Way to Center Street.

Page 20 of 518 ends

Page 444 ends

Milvia Street, east side, from Center Street to Bancroft Way.

Milvia Street, both sides from Derby Street to Ward Street.

Modoc Street, east side, from Solano Avenue to 90 feet south of Solano Avenue.

Modoc Street, west side, from Solano Avenue to 66 feet south of Solano Avenue.

Ninth Street, east side, from 300 feet north of Gilman Street to Gilman Street.

Ninth Street, west side, from 75 feet north of University Avenue to 150 feet south of University Avenue.

Ninth Street, both sides, from Heinz Avenue to Anthony Street.

Ninth Street, east side, from Anthony Street to Potter Street.

Oregon Street, north side, from 75 feet east of Telegraph Avenue to 50 feet west of Telegraph Avenue.

Oregon Street, south side, from 175 feet east of Telegraph Avenue to Telegraph Avenue.

Oregon Street, both sides, from Shattuck Avenue to Adeline Street.

Oxford Street, both sides, from Hearst Avenue to Kittredge Street.

Page Street, north side, from San Pablo Avenue to Tenth Street.

Pardee Street, south side, from San Pablo Avenue extending 60 feet west of San Pablo Avenue.

Parker Street, both sides, from 200 feet west of Regent Street to 100 feet west of Telegraph Avenue.

Parker Street, both sides, from Shattuck Avenue to 100 feet west of Shattuck Avenue.

Parker Street, north side, from 100 feet east of Shattuck Avenue to Shattuck Avenue.

Potter Street, both sides, from Seventh Street to Ninth Street.

Regent Street, east side, from Ashby Avenue to 125 feet south of Webster Street.

Regent Street, west side, from Ashby Avenue to South Hospital Drive.

Ridge Road, north side, from 100 feet east of Euclid Avenue to 250 feet west of Euclid Avenue.

Ridge Road, south side, from LeRoy Avenue to 250 feet west of Euclid Avenue.

Rose Street, north side, from 100 feet east of Shattuck Avenue to 100 feet west of Henry Street.

Rose Street, south side, from Walnut Street to Shattuck Place.

Russell Street, north side, from 85 feet east of College Avenue to 175 feet west of College Avenue.

Page 21 of 518 ends

Page 445 ends

Russell Street, south side, from 120 feet east of College Avenue to 200 feet west of College Avenue.

Russell Street, south side, from 75 feet east of Telegraph Avenue to 100 feet west of Telegraph Avenue.

San Pablo Avenue, both sides, from Harrison Street to Carrison Street.

Scenic Avenue, east side, from Hearst Avenue to Ridge Road.

Seventh Street, east side, from University Avenue to 150 feet south of University Avenue.

Shattuck Avenue, both sides, from 100 feet north of Rose Street to University Avenue.

Shattuck Avenue, both sides, of the east roadway, from University Avenue to Addison Street (Shattuck Square).

Shattuck Avenue, both sides, of the west roadway, from University Avenue to Addison Street (Shattuck Square).

Shattuck Avenue, both sides, of the east roadway, from Addison Street to Center Street (Berkeley Square).

Shattuck Avenue, both sides, of the west roadway, from Addison Street to Center Street (Berkeley Square).

Shattuck Avenue, both sides, from Center Street to Ashby Avenue.

Shattuck Place, both sides, from Rose Street to Shattuck Avenue.

Sixth Street, east side, University Avenue to Addison Street.

Solano Avenue, both sides, from Tulare Avenue to The Alameda.

Solano Avenue, north side, from 140 feet to 184 feet east of The Alameda.

South Hospital Drive, south side, from Colby Street to 75 feet west of Colby Street.

Stuart Street, north side, from 70 feet east of Shattuck Avenue to Adeline Street.

Stuart Street, south side, from 50 feet east of Telegraph Avenue to Telegraph Avenue.

Tacoma Avenue, both sides, from 66 feet north of Solano Avenue to Solano Avenue.

Telegraph Avenue, both sides, from Bancroft Way to Dwight Way.

Telegraph Avenue, both sides, from Dwight Way to Woolsey Street.

Tenth Street, west side, from 300 feet north of Gilman Street to Gilman Street.

Tenth Street, both sides, from Gilman Street to Camelia Street.

Tenth Street, east side, from 100 feet north of University Avenue to 100 feet south of University Avenue.

Tenth Street, both sides, from Parker Street to Carleton Street.

Page 22 of 518 ends

Page 446 ends

The Alameda, east side, from Solano Avenue to Los Angeles Avenue.

The Alameda, west side, from 90 feet north of Solano Avenue to 220 feet north of Los Angeles Avenue.

Tulare Avenue, east side, from Solano Avenue to 90 feet south of Solano Avenue.

University Avenue, both sides, from Oxford Street to Third Street.

Vine Street, north side, from 75 feet east of Walnut Street to 100 feet east of Henry Street.

Vine Street, south side, from 150 feet east of Walnut Street to 100 feet east of Henry Street.

Virginia Street, north side, from 150 feet east of Shattuck Avenue to 150 feet west of Shattuck Avenue.

Virginia Street, south side, from Shattuck Avenue to 125 feet west of Shattuck Avenue.

Walnut Street, east side, from 75 feet north of Vine Street to 125 feet south of Vine Street.

Walnut Street, west side, from Rose Street to 200 feet south of Vine Street.

Walnut Street, both sides, from Berkeley Way to University Avenue.

Ward Street, north side, from 300 feet east of Milvia Street to Milvia Street.

Webster Street, both sides, from 125 feet east of College Avenue to 100 feet west of College Avenue.

Webster Street, north side, from Colby Street to 150 feet west of Telegraph Avenue.

Webster Street, south side, from Colby Street to 100 feet west of Telegraph Avenue.

B. goBerkeley SmartSpace Program parking meter zones are those streets or portions of streets currently included in Residential Preferential Program (RPP) Area I in the City hereinafter described as zones within which the parking of motor vehicles shall be controlled, regulated and inspected with the aid of parking meters, pay stations, and/or a City-approved software application that processes pay-by-phone payments from a mobile phone at fees set in 14.52.120:

Channing Way, north side, from Piedmont Avenue to College Avenue.

Durant Avenue, both sides, from Piedmont Avenue to College Avenue.

Haste Street, both sides, from Piedmont Avenue to College Avenue.

Piedmont Avenue, both sides, from Bancroft Way to Dwight Way.

Page 23 of 518 ends

Page 447 ends

C. The City Traffic Engineer shall cause parking meters and pay stations to be installed and maintained in all parking meter zones.

14.52.020 Manner of installation.

A. Single space meters.

1. Parking meters shall be installed upon the curb or sidewalk area immediately adjacent to each parking space. Each meter shall be placed in such manner as to show or display by a sign or signal that the parking space adjacent thereto is or is not legally in use. Each parking meter shall indicate the limit of parking time in the parking space adjacent to the parking meter.

2. Each parking meter shall be set to display, after the operational procedure has been completed, a sign or signal indicating legal parking for that period of time conforming to the limit of parking time as indicated on the meter, and shall continue to operate from the time of the completion of the operational procedure until the expiration of the time fixed as the parking limit or a portion thereof for the part of the street upon which said meter is placed. Each said meter shall also be so arranged that upon the expiration of said legal parking time it will indicate by a mechanical operation and by proper signal that the lawful parking period has expired.

B. Pay stations.

1. Pay stations are used to accept payment for multiple paid parking spaces on a block face or off-street parking lot and shall include pay-and-display stations and pay-by-plate stations.

2. Pay stations shall be installed upon the curb or sidewalk area within any designated meter zone. Each pay station shall indicate the limit of parking time in that particular designated meter zone.

3. Each pay-and-display station shall be set to dispense, after the operational procedure has been completed, a two-part windshield dispensing machine ticket indicating legal parking for that period of time conforming to the limit of parking time as indicated on the pay-and-display station or indicated by signage or curb markings.

4. Each pay-by-plate station shall be set for the vehicle operator to register their vehicle license plate as the parking permit indicating legal parking for that period of time conforming to the limit of parking time as indicated on the pay-by-plate station or indicated by signage or curb markings.

14.52.030 Time of operation of parking meters and pay stations.

Page 24 of 518 ends

Page 448 ends

A. The provision of this chapter relating to the operation of parking meters and pay stations shall be effective between the hours of nine a.m. and eight p.m. every day, and as may be otherwise provided for specific locations in the sections of establishing parking meter zones.

B. goBerkeley SmartSpace Program

1. The provision of this chapter relating to the operation of parking meters and pay stations in the goBerkeley SmartSpace program areas listed in 14.52.010 (B) shall be effective between the hours of eight a.m. and eight p.m. every day.

2. A motor vehicle which has a valid RPP “Area I” annual or visitor residential parking permit is exempt from hourly paid parking in the goBerkeley SmartSpace program areas listed in 14.52.010 (B).

14.52.040 Operational procedure to be followed.

A. Single space meters. Immediately after occupancy of a parking meter space, the operator of a vehicle shall, if necessary, deposit a coin of the United States, or use a credit or debit card acceptable to the City, or use a tap-to-pay enabled device, or use a City-approved software application that processes pay-by-phone payments from a mobile phone, at said parking meter in accordance with the instructions posted on the face of the parking meter or the pay-by-phone software application that processes payments from a mobile device.

B. Pay-and-display stations.

1. Immediately after occupancy of a pay-and-display station space, the operator of a vehicle shall, if necessary, locate the nearest pay-and-display station on the block and deposit a coin of the United States, or use a credit or debit card acceptable to the City, or use a tap-to-pay enabled device, or use a City-approved software application that processes pay-by-phone payments from a mobile phone at said pay-and-display station and make selections in accordance with the instructions posted on the face of the pay- and-display station, or the pay-by-phone software application that processes payments from a mobile phone.

2. Upon obtaining the printed dispensing machine ticket from the pay-and-display station, the operator of the vehicle shall return immediately to their vehicle and place the dispensing machine ticket face up on the street-side of the vehicle’s dashboard in such a manner that the expiration time and date are readily visible from the exterior.

C. Pay-by-plate stations.

Page 25 of 518 ends

Page 449 ends

Immediately after occupancy of a pay-by-plate station space, the operator of a vehicle shall, if necessary, locate the nearest pay-by-plate station on the block, enter their vehicle license plate number to register their payment, deposit a coin of the United States, or use a credit or debit card acceptable to the City, or use a tap-to-pay enabled device, or use a City-approved software application that processes pay-by-phone payments from a mobile phone at said pay-by-plate station, and make selections in accordance with the instructions posted on the face of the pay-by-plate station, or the pay-by-phone software application that processes payments from a mobile phone.

14.52.050 Unlawful to park after meter and/or pay station time has expired.

A. Single space meter. It is unlawful for the operator of any vehicle to permit said vehicle to remain parked in any parking space during any time that an operable meter is showing a signal indicating that such space is illegally in use, such as where the time has expired, unless the operator of the vehicle has otherwise paid for the parking space via the use of a City-approved software application that processes pay-by-phone payments from a mobile phone, other than such time immediately after the original occupancy as is necessary to operate the meter to show legal parking.

B. Pay-and-display stations. It is unlawful for the operator of any vehicle to permit said vehicle to remain parked in any parking space during any time that pay-and-display station dispensing machine ticket is indicating that such space is illegally in use, such as where the time has expired, unless the operator of the vehicle has otherwise paid for the parking space via the use of a City-approved software application that processes pay-by-phone payments from a mobile phone, other than such time immediately after the original occupancy as is necessary to obtain a receipt from the pay-and-display station and to place said dispensing machine ticket face up on the street-side of the vehicle’s dashboard to show legal parking.

C. Pay-by plate stations. It is unlawful for the operator of any vehicle to permit said vehicle to remain parked in any parking space during any time that the operator has not registered their vehicle by entering their vehicle license plate number and submitted payment at the nearest pay-by-plate station, unless the operator of the vehicle has otherwise paid for the parking space via the use of a City-approved software application that processes pay-by-phone payments from a mobile phone, other than such time immediately after the original occupancy as is necessary to register their vehicle license plate number at the pay-by-plate station.

14.52.060 Unlawful to extend time beyond limit.

A. Single space meter. It is unlawful and a violation of the provisions of this chapter for any person to follow the operational procedure or any part of the operational procedure for the purpose of increasing or extending the parking time of any vehicle beyond the

Page 26 of 518 ends

Page 450 ends

legal parking time which has been established for the parking space adjacent to which said parking meter is placed.

B. Pay-and-display stations. It is unlawful and a violation of the provisions of this chapter for any person to follow the operational procedure or any part of the operational procedure for the purpose of increasing or extending the parking time of any vehicle beyond the legal parking time which has been established for the parking space which is indicated on the pay-and-display station dispensing machine ticket.

C. Pay-by-plate stations. It is unlawful and a violation of the provisions of this chapter for any person to follow the operational procedure or any part of the operational procedure for the purpose of increasing or extending the parking time of any vehicle beyond the legal parking time which has been established for the parking space controlled by the nearest pay-by-plate station.

14.52.063 No pay-and-display dispensing machine ticket displayed.

A motor vehicle on which is properly displayed a valid pay-and-display dispensing machine ticket as provided for herein shall be permitted to stand or be parked in a pay- and-display zone for which the dispensing machine ticket has been issued for the period of time indicated on the dispensing machine ticket without being subject to parking penalties in effect for such area. However, any motor vehicle on which there is not displayed a valid dispensing machine ticket as provided herein shall be subject to parking regulations and consequent penalties in effect for such area. (Ord. 7305-NS (part), 2013)

14.52.066 Improperly displayed pay-and-display dispensing machine ticket.

A motor vehicle on which the pay-and-display dispensing machine ticket is not properly displayed as provided herein shall be subject to parking regulations and consequent penalties in effect for such area. (Ord. 7305-NS (part), 2013)

14.52.070 Improper use of meter and pay station.

It is unlawful to deposit or cause to be deposited in any parking meter any defaced or bent coin, or any slug, device or metallic substitute for a coin of the United States, or to otherwise use any card or other device in a parking meter or pay station having alternative payment capability in lieu of a card or device lawful and appropriate to an alternative payment process at such parking meter or pay station, or for any person to deface, injure, tamper with, open or willfully break, destroy or impair the usefulness of any parking meter or pay station. (Ord. 7305-NS (part), 2013)

14.52.080 Deposit of coins in meter or coins, credit card, debit card, or epark card in meter or pay station by unauthorized person.

A. Single space meter. It is unlawful for any person, other than the owner or operator of a vehicle, to deposit any coin, debit card or credit card in any parking meter without the

Page 27 of 518 ends

Page 451 ends

knowledge or consent of said owner or operator of the vehicle using the parking space immediately adjacent to said meter.

B. Pay stations. It is unlawful for any person, other than the owner or operator of a vehicle, to deposit any coin, credit card, debit card, or epark card in any pay station without the knowledge or consent of said owner or operator of the vehicle using the parking space. (Ord. 7305-NS (part), 2013)

14.52.090 Parking meters, pay stations and parking meter/pay station standards not to be used for certain purposes.

A. Single space meters. It is unlawful for any person to attach anything to or allow a bicycle, newsrack or any other article or thing to lean against a parking meter or a parking meter standard.

B. Pay stations. It is unlawful for any person to attach anything to or allow a bicycle, newsrack or any other article or thing to lean against a pay station unit or a pay station standard. (Ord. 7305-NS (part), 2013)

14.52.100 Rule of evidence.

A. Single space meters. The parking or standing of any motor vehicle in a parking space, at which space the parking meter displays the sign or signal indicating illegal parking, shall constitute a prima facie presumption that the vehicle has been parked or allowed to stand in such space for a period longer than permitted by this chapter.

B. Pay-and-display stations. The parking or standing of any motor vehicle in a parking space, at which space the pay-and-display station dispensing machine ticket indicates illegal parking, shall constitute a prima facie presumption that the vehicle has been parked or allowed to stand in such space for a period longer than permitted by this chapter.

C. Pay-by-plate stations. The parking or standing of any motor vehicle in a parking space, at which space the vehicle license plate has not been registered at the nearest pay-by-plate station, shall constitute a prima facie presumption that the vehicle has been parked or allowed to stand in such a space for a period longer than permitted by this chapter.

14.52.110 Use of money deposited in parking meters and pay stations.

Except as permitted under subdivision G below, all moneys collected from parking meters and pay stations in the City shall be placed in a special fund, which fund shall be used for the following purposes:

Page 28 of 518 ends

Page 452 ends

A. For the purchasing, leasing, installing, repairing, maintaining, operating, removing, regulating and policing of parking meters and pay stations in the City and for the payment of any and all expenses relating or incidental thereto.

B. For the purchasing, leasing, acquiring, improving, operating and maintaining of off- street parking facilities in the City.

C. For the installation and maintenance of traffic control devices and signals.

D. For the painting and marking of streets and curbs required for the direction of traffic and the parking of motor vehicles.

E. For the proper regulation, control and inspection of parking and traffic upon the public streets.

F. To be pledged as security for the payment of principal of and interest on off-street parking revenue bonds issued by the City.

G. Additional Revenue deemed to be generated by the goBerkeley Program will be used to fund goBerkeley efforts, pursuant to Section 1012(b) of Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, as amended, as agreed in the 2012 Cooperative Agreement between the City of Berkeley, the California Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration.

H. Surplus money not utilized under subdivision A through F above may be transferred to the general fund. The City Manager or their designee may make an annual determination as to what is surplus based on the needs and obligations of the special fund and transfer such surplus to the general fund. (Ord. 7498-NS § 2, 2016: Ord. 7305- NS (part), 2013).

14.52.120 Parking meter and pay station fees.

Single-space meter and pay station fees for the goBerkeley Program parking meter zones hereinabove set forth in 14.52.010 shall be as follows:

A. For goBerkeley Program parking meter zones set forth in 14.52.010:

1. Pay stations and credit card enabled single-space meters may accept nickels, dimes, quarters, one dollar coins, credit/debit cards, and tap-to-pay mobile devices. The City Manager may authorize the removal of coin-acceptance hardware to transition to a cashless parking environment.

2. The minimum transaction amount for cash payment shall be five cents ($0.05) and shall purchase a segment of time proportional to the prevailing hourly rate, rounded up

Page 29 of 518 ends

Page 453 ends

to the nearest whole minute. The prevailing hourly rate for meter zones specified in 14.52.010 shall be set by section 14.52.120(B).

3. The minute minimum transaction amount for credit/debit card payment shall be set by the City Manager to ensure cost recovery for transaction processing fees. The prevailing hourly rate for meter zones specified in 14.52.010 shall be set by section 14.52.120(B).

B. At single-space meters and pay stations within the goBerkeley Program parking meter zones:

1. The hourly rate may vary between $0.50 and $5.00 per hour effective FY 2017, between $0.50 and $6.00 per hour effective FY 2018, between $0.50 and $7.00 effective FY 2019, and between $0.50 and $8.00 effective FY 2020, as set by the City Manager.

2. The parking fee may be either flat rates (same rate for a specified time period e.g. 1 hour, 4 hours, all day), or may be variable rates based on time of day, length of stay, or a combination of those pricing structures, as set by the City Manager.

3. The City Manager may adjust the parking fee by increments no larger than 50 cents ($0.50) per hour.

4. The City Manager may implement special event pricing at designated times and at designated pay stations and parking meters,

5. Adjustments to the parking fee must be supported by published data on parking usage statistics with the goal of achieving 65-85% parking occupancy of spaces as calculated in the goBerkeley Program Guidelines.

6. Adjustments to the parking fee at pay stations and parking meters must be posted to the City’s website no later than 30 calendar days prior to the adjustment.

7. Parking rates may be adjusted no more frequently than once per 60 calendar days. (Ord. 7752-NS § 2, 2021: Ord. 7498-NS § 3, 2016: Ord. 7308-NS § 1, 2013: Ord. 7305-NS (part), 2013)

14.52.130 Time limits enforced at inoperable parking meters and pay stations.

A. Single space meters. Where parking meters are installed in the City, if the parking meter is inoperable, the time limits posted on the parking meter shall be enforced during the hours of operation of parking meters.

B. Pay stations. Where pay stations are installed in the City, if the pay station is inoperable, the time limits posted on the pay station within the block that the vehicle is

Page 30 of 518 ends

Page 454 ends

parked or indicated by signage or curb markings shall be enforced during the hours of operation of the pay station.

Section 2. Copies of this Ordinance shall be posted for two days prior to adoption in the display case located near the walkway in front of the Maudelle Shirek Building, 2134 Martin Luther King Jr. Way. Within 15 days of adoption, copies of this Ordinance shall be filed at each branch of the Berkeley Public Library and the title shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation.

Exhibits
A: goBerkeley Operating Area Map

Page 31 of 518 ends

Page 455 ends

Exhibit A: goBerkeley Expansion Map

Page 32 of 518 ends

Page 456 ends

Page 33 of 518 ends

Page 457 ends

RESOLUTION NO. ##,###-N.S.

DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO TRANSITION FROM CITY-ABSORBED

PARKING METER TRANSACTION COSTS TO A TRANSPARENT TRANSACTION

CHARGE PAID BY THE CUSTOMER
WHEREAS, the City of Berkeley’s goBerkeley Parking Management Program is designed to manage curb space through demand-responsive pricing; and WHEREAS, the Parking Meter Fund (631) and Off-Street Parking Fund (627) are currently facing projected structural deficits due to rising operational, maintenance, and personnel costs; and
WHEREAS, the City currently utilizes a “hidden fee” model for on-street parking and garage transactions, wherein the City absorbs all credit card processing fees and merchant service charges, effectively reducing the net revenue available for infrastructure maintenance and operational improvements; and WHEREAS, the absorption of these fees results in a multi-hundred-thousand-dollar annual impact on the Parking Meter Fund; and
WHEREAS, Berkeley’s existing mobile payment platform (ParkMobile) already utilizes a transparent service fee model, wherein the customer pays a small “convenience” fee for the convenience of mobile payment, a model that is widely accepted and understood by the public; and
WHEREAS, transitioning to a transparent transaction charge for all credit card and digital transactions at physical meters and pay stations will align Berkeley’s hardware payment model with its mobile payment model, creating a consistent user experience across all payment platforms; and
WHEREAS, this shift ensures that the costs of digital payment processing are borne by the user of the service rather than being subsidized by the City’s parking funds, thereby preserving revenue for critical public services and transit-related goals; and WHEREAS, providing transparency in cost structures allows the City to more accurately set hourly parking rates based on occupancy data without those rates being artificially inflated or eroded by merchant service costs; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds this action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301, 15307 and 15308.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Berkeley that the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to transition the City’s parking payment

Page 34 of 518 ends

Page 458 ends

systems from a City-absorbed cost model to a transparent transaction charge model, wherein a per-transaction service charge is paid by the customer.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to set and adjust such costs as necessary to cover the prevailing costs of credit card processing and vendor transaction charges, ensuring the model remains consistent with the City’s mobile payment integrations.

Page 35 of 518 ends

Page 459 ends

RESOLUTION NO. ##,###-N.S.

ADOPTING A NEW FEE STRUCTURE AND UPDATING FEES FOR THE

RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT (RPP) PROGRAM TO ACHIEVE COST

RECOVERY AND ADVANCE CITY ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS
WHEREAS, the Residential Parking Permit (RPP) Program was established in 1980 to protect Berkeley neighborhoods from commuter parking overflow and to preserve the quality of life for residents; and
WHEREAS, the annual cost to administer, maintain, and enforce the RPP program— including personnel costs for Public Works administrative staff, 21 Police Department Parking Enforcement Officers, and 3 supervisors—is approximately $4.12 million; and WHEREAS, the RPP program has historically operated at a significant structural deficit, with average annual permit revenues of only $2.85 million, requiring a $1.3 million annual subsidy from the City’s General Fund and Parking Meter Fund; and WHEREAS, the City’s Strategic Plan and Climate Action Plan prioritize the efficient management of the public right-of-way and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions through sustainable transportation policies; and
WHEREAS, the current "flat-fee" permit structure does not account for the disproportionate impact of households that store three or more private vehicles on public streets, which limits available curb space for other residents and service providers; and
WHEREAS, a graduated fee structure—wherein the cost of each subsequent permit at a single address increases—is a proven management tool to encourage the use of off- street parking, reduce the "privatization" of public space for long-term vehicle storage, and promote alternative modes of transportation; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary to adjust RPP fees to move the program toward a self-sustaining "enterprise" model, ensuring that the beneficiaries of the program cover the costs of its operation and enforcement.

WHEREAS, the City Council finds this action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Berkeley that the City Manager is hereby authorized to update the Residential Parking Permit fee schedule to reflect a graduated pricing model.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the new fee structure shall be implemented effective July 1, 2027 (FY 2028), as follows:

Page 36 of 518 ends

Page 460 ends

Permit type FY27 (Current Year) FY28
Annual Residential & In-Home Care (3
per address) $85
$100 first permit
$125 second permit
$150 third permit
Semi-Annual Residential & In-Home Care
(3 per address) $42
$50 first permit
$63 second permit
$75 third permit
Surcharge per Additional Annual or Semi-
Annual Residential Permit, if Waiver
Approved
$100 $125
Child Care (one permit per household) $83 $100
1-Day Visitor $4 $5
14-Day Visitor $44 $55
Neighborhood Serving Community Facility $90 $105
1-Day Senior Center $4 $5
Merchant $190 $195

Page 37 of 518 ends

Page 461 ends

RESOLUTION NO. ##,###-N.S.

ADOPTING AN UPDATED SCHEDULE OF FINES AND LATE PAYMENT PENALTIES

FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS TO ENSURE REGIONAL ALIGNMENT, COST RECOVERY, AND ENFORCEMENT EFFICACY; AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 71,627-N.S.

WHEREAS, the current fine amounts for most parking violations have not been adjusted in over 15 years, failing to keep pace with the rising costs of personnel, equipment, and the specialized technology required for modern parking enforcement; and WHEREAS, while the majority of Berkeley’s parking fine amounts were last updated in 2010, the schedule of fines was expanded to include new violation types in 2012, 2018, 2023, and 2024; and
WHEREAS, an analysis of neighboring jurisdictions reveals that Berkeley’s current fines are significantly lower than those of Oakland and San Francisco—for example, Berkeley’s $43 expired meter fine is approximately 33% lower than Oakland’s $64 fine and over 100% lower than San Francisco’s $108 fine—thereby diminishing the deterrent effect of citations; and
WHEREAS, when parking fines are low relative to the cost of off-street parking or the value of convenience, drivers are more likely to risk illegal parking, which increases double-parking, blocks bike lanes, and prevents the target occupancy of 65-85% necessary for a healthy parking management program; and WHEREAS, a 3-49% increase in the amount of each parking fine, based on cumulative inflation occurring since the year a particular fine was last updated, based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI), will bring Berkeley into closer alignment with regional standards while ensuring that the cost of managing the public right-of-way is supported by those who violate established regulations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that increasing these penalties is necessary to reinforce the deterrent effect of citations, encourage compliance with the goBerkeley program guidelines, and keep pace with the rising costs to the City of implementing the program; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds this action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301, 15307 and 15308.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Berkeley that the Schedule of Parking Violations and Fines and the Schedule of Late Payment Penalties are hereby amended to increase all existing fine and penalty amounts by 3-49%, rounded to the nearest whole dollar.

Page 38 of 518 ends

Page 462 ends

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this updated schedule shall take effect on May 1, 2026, and the City Manager is authorized to take all necessary administrative actions to update enforcement software and public notification materials accordingly.

Exhibits
Exhibit A: Schedule of Fines and Late Payment Penalties for Parking Violations

Page 39 of 518 ends

Page 463 ends

Exhibit A: Schedule of Fines and Late Payment Penalties for Parking Violations Code Section Violation Description
(For citations issued to a vehicle)
FD = Football Game Days 9 a.m. to
11 p.m.

FD fines = 50% higher on most
violations &
at least 100% higher for violations in
RPP Zone A
Fine
Amount
On
Day
28 +$30
On
Day
47 +$50
BMC 6.24.020 Off-St Rsrv Pkg No Permit Displayed $72 $102 $152 BMC 6.24.020 FD Off-St Rsrv Pkg No Permit
Displayed
$107 $137 $187
BMC 6.24.020 Non-Electric Vehicle Parked in
Electric Vehicle Space
$52 $82 $132
BMC 6.24.060 Electric Vehicle Exceeding EV
Parking Space Time Limit
$45 $75 $125
BMC 6.24.020 Electric Vehicle Not Actively
Charging in EV Parking Space
$52 $82 $132
BMC 6.24.093 P&D Dispensing Mach Tkt Not
Displayed
$64 $94 $144
BMC 6.24.093 FD P&D Dispensing Mach Tkt Not
Displayed
$97 $127 $177
BMC 6.24.096 Improper Display of P&D Disp Mach
Tkt
$64 $94 $144
BMC 6.24.096 FD Improper Display of P&D Disp
Mach Tkt
$97 $127 $177
BMC 6.24.100 B P&D Station Expired Time $64 $94 $144
BMC 6.24.100 B FD P&D Station Expired Time $97 $127 $177 BMC 6.24.103 B Time Limits Enforced at Inoperable
P&D Sta
$64 $94 $144
BMC 6.24.103 B FD Time Limits Enforced at
Inoperable P&D Sta
$97 $127 $177

Page 40 of 518 ends

Page 464 ends

Code Section Violation Description
(For citations issued to a vehicle)
FD = Football Game Days 9 a.m. to
11 p.m.

FD fines = 50% higher on most
violations &
at least 100% higher for violations in
RPP Zone A
Fine
Amount
On
Day
28 +$30
On
Day
47 +$50
BMC 6.24.130 Off-St Facility: Motorcycle Zone
Only
$72 $102 $152
BMC 6.24.130 Off-St Facility: Pkg Outside
Markings
$72 $102 $152
BMC 6.24.130 FD Off-St Facility: Pkg Outside
Markings
$107 $137 $187
BMC 6.24.130 Off-St Facility: Disabled Zone $429 $459 $509 BMC 6.24.130 Off-St Facility: Restricted Load Zone $72 $102 $152 BMC 6.24.130 FD Off-St Facility: Restricted Load
Zone
$107 $137 $187
BMC 6.24.130 Off-St Facility: Unmarked Space $72 $102 $152 BMC 6.24.130 FD Off-St Facility: Unmarked Space $107 $137 $187 BMC 6.24.140 Off-St Facility: Backed-In $72 $102 $152
BMC 9.52.140 Unattended Taxi Over 5 Min $136 $166 $216
BMC 13.52.040 Unauth Pkg on Private Property $61 $91 $141 BMC 14.24.070 Unauth Vehicle on Private Prop $95 $125 $175 BMC 14.24.230 No Parking in Transit-Only Lane $281 $311 $361 BMC 14.36.030
A
No Parking on Divisnl Islands $82 $112 $162
BMC 14.36.030
A
FD No Parking on Divisnl Islands $124 $154 $204
BMC 14.36.030
C
No Parking Zone (Sign Posted) $95 $125 $175

Page 41 of 518 ends

Page 465 ends

Code Section Violation Description
(For citations issued to a vehicle)
FD = Football Game Days 9 a.m. to
11 p.m.

FD fines = 50% higher on most
violations &
at least 100% higher for violations in
RPP Zone A
Fine
Amount
On
Day
28 +$30
On
Day
47 +$50
BMC 14.36.030
C
FD No Parking Zone (Sign Posted) $143 $173 $223
BMC 14.36.030
C
No Parking Zone (Red Curb) $95 $125 $175
BMC 14.36.030
C
FD No Parking Zone (Red Curb) $143 $173 $223
BMC 14.36.030
D
No Parking Street Sweeping (sign) $73 $103 $153
BMC 14.36.030
E
No Parking on Railroad Tracks $95 $125 $175
BMC 14.36.030
F
Hazard Obstructing Traffic $95 $125 $175
BMC 14.36.030
F
FD Hazard Obstructing Traffic $143 $173 $223
BMC 14.36.030
G
Construct: No Permit on Dashboard $95 $125 $175
BMC 14.36.030
G
FD Construct: No Permit on
Dashboard
$143 $173 $223
BMC 14.36.050 On Street 72 or More Consec hrs $89 $119 $169 BMC 14.36.060 Repair Vehicle on Street $77 $107 $157
BMC 14.36.080 Vehicle Parked in School Zone $76 $106 $156 BMC 14.36.090 Pkg on Grade Brake/Block Wheels $82 $112 $162 BMC 14.36.110 Emerg Prkg w/o Permit (Tow CVC
22651)
$77 $107 $157

Page 42 of 518 ends

Page 466 ends

Code Section Violation Description
(For citations issued to a vehicle)
FD = Football Game Days 9 a.m. to
11 p.m.

FD fines = 50% higher on most
violations &
at least 100% higher for violations in
RPP Zone A
Fine
Amount
On
Day
28 +$30
On
Day
47 +$50
BMC 14.40.010 3 min Limit Zone Overtime $64 $94 $144
BMC 14.40.010 FD 3 min Limit Zone Overtime $97 $127 $177 BMC 14.40.010 5 min Limit Zone Overtime $64 $94 $144
BMC 14.40.010 FD 5 min Limit Zone Overtime $97 $127 $177 BMC 14.40.010 10 min Limit Zone Overtime $64 $94 $144
BMC 14.40.010 FD 10 min Limit Zone Overtime $97 $127 $177 BMC 14.40.010 12 min Limit Zone Overtime $64 $94 $144
BMC 14.40.010 FD 12 min Limit Zone Overtime $97 $127 $177 BMC 14.40.010 15 min Limit Zone Overtime $64 $94 $144
BMC 14.40.010 FD 15 min Limit Zone Overtime $97 $127 $177 BMC 14.40.010 24 min Limit Zone Overtime $64 $94 $144
BMC 14.40.010 FD 24 min Limit Zone Overtime $97 $127 $177 BMC 14.40.020 30 min Limit Zone Overtime $64 $94 $144
BMC 14.40.020 FD 30 min Limit Zone Overtime $97 $127 $177 BMC 14.40.030 1 hr Limit Zone Overtime $64 $94 $144
BMC 14.40.030 FD 1 hr Limit Zone Overtime $97 $127 $177 BMC 14.40.030 Faulty Meter Over 1 hr Limit $64 $94 $144 BMC 14.40.040 2 hr Limit Zone Overtime $64 $94 $144
BMC 14.40.040 FD 2 hr Limit Zone Overtime $97 $127 $177 BMC 14.40.040 Faulty Meter Over 2 hr Limit $64 $94 $144 BMC 14.40.050
A
Parallel Pkg Veh Outside Markers $72 $102 $152

Page 43 of 518 ends

Page 467 ends

Code Section Violation Description
(For citations issued to a vehicle)
FD = Football Game Days 9 a.m. to
11 p.m.

FD fines = 50% higher on most
violations &
at least 100% higher for violations in
RPP Zone A
Fine
Amount
On
Day
28 +$30
On
Day
47 +$50
BMC 14.40.050
A
FD Parallel Pkg Veh Outside
Markers
$107 $137 $187
BMC 14.40.050
B
Veh Facing Wrong Way 1-way St $72 $102 $152
BMC 14.40.050
B
FD Veh Facing Wrong Way 1-way St $107 $137 $187
BMC 14.40.050
B
Pkg Over 18" from Curb 1-way St $76 $106 $156
BMC 14.40.050
B
FD Pkg Over 18" fr Curb 1-way St $115 $145 $195
BMC 14.40.060
A
Diagonal Pkg Veh Outside Markers $76 $106 $156
BMC 14.40.060
A
FD Diagonal Pkg Veh Outside
Markers
$115 $145 $195
BMC 14.40.060
B
Diagonal Pkg FW Over 6" from Curb $76 $106 $156
BMC 14.40.070
A
No Stopping 4-6pm (Tow CVC
22651)
$95 $125 $175
BMC 14.40.070
A
FD No Stopping 4-6pm (Tow CVC
22651)
$143 $173 $223
BMC 14.40.070
A
No Stopping 7-9am (Tow CVC
22651)
$95 $125 $175
BMC 14.40.070
A
No Stopping 9pm-6am (Tow CVC
22651)
$95 $125 $175
BMC 14.40.070
A
Posted No Stopping Tow Away $95 $125 $175
BMC 14.40.090 RPP Zone No RPP Permit Displayed $73 $103 $153

Page 44 of 518 ends

Page 468 ends

Code Section Violation Description
(For citations issued to a vehicle)
FD = Football Game Days 9 a.m. to
11 p.m.

FD fines = 50% higher on most
violations &
at least 100% higher for violations in
RPP Zone A
Fine
Amount
On
Day
28 +$30
On
Day
47 +$50
BMC 14.40.090 FD RPP Zone A No Permit Dsply $146 $176 $226 BMC 14.40.090 RPP Zone K No Permit Displayed $85 $115 $165 BMC 14.40.090 RPP Zone RPP Permit Expired $73 $103 $153 BMC 14.40.090 RPP Zone Permit Improper Display $73 $103 $153 BMC 14.40.090 FD RPP A Permit lmprop Dsply $146 $176 $226 BMC 14.40.090 No RPP Permit Displayed in
Enhanced Fine Area (Football
Game Days)
$335 $365 $415
BMC 14.40.130 Pkg/Standing in City Lots/Spaces $82 $112 $162 BMC 14.40.130
A
City Lot No Permit Displayed $85 $115 $165
BMC 14.40.130
C
Reserved Pkg No Permit Displayed $73 $103 $153
BMC 14.40.130
E
Reserved City Hall Pkg Towable $95 $125 $175
BMC 14.40.150
A
Car Parking in Motorcycle Area $76 $106 $156
BMC 14.40.150
B
Motorcycle Zone Overtime $76 $106 $156
BMC 14.40.160 Dbl-Pkd Commer Vehicle Center St $89 $119 $169

Page 45 of 518 ends

Page 469 ends

Code Section Violation Description
(For citations issued to a vehicle)
FD = Football Game Days 9 a.m. to
11 p.m.

FD fines = 50% higher on most
violations &
at least 100% higher for violations in
RPP Zone A
Fine
Amount
On
Day
28 +$30
On
Day
47 +$50
BMC 14.44.020
B
Commer Zone No Permit (yellow) $85 $115 $165
BMC 14.44.020
B
FD Commer Zone No Permit
(yellow)
$128 $158 $208
BMC 14.44.020
A
Commercial Zone Overtime $85 $115 $165
BMC 14.44.020
A
FD Commercial Zone Overtime $128 $158 $208
BMC 14.44.030 Passenger Load Zone (white curb) $85 $115 $165 BMC 14.44.030 FD Passgr Load Zone (white curb} $128 $158 $208 BMC 14.44.040 No Stopping Bicycle Zone $82 $112 $162
BMC 14.44.040 FD No Stopping Bicycle Zone $124 $154 $204 BMC 14.44.050 Special Passenger Load Zone only $85 $115 $165 BMC 14.44.060 Parking in Coach (bus) Zone $95 $125 $175 BMC 14.44.060 FD Parking in Coach (bus} Zone $143 $173 $223 BMC 14.44.070 Unauthorized Use of Funeral Zone $76 $106 $156 BMC 14.44.080 Unauthorized Taxicab Stand Pkg $76 $106 $156 BMC 14.46.040
B
Non-Electric Vehicle Parked in EV
Space
$64 $94 $144
BMC 14.46.050
B
Electric Vehicle Exceeding EV
Space Time Limit
$56 $86 $136

Page 46 of 518 ends

Page 470 ends

Code Section Violation Description
(For citations issued to a vehicle)
FD = Football Game Days 9 a.m. to
11 p.m.

FD fines = 50% higher on most
violations &
at least 100% higher for violations in
RPP Zone A
Fine
Amount
On
Day
28 +$30
On
Day
47 +$50
BMC 14.46.050
C
Electric Vehicle Not Actively
Charging in EV Space
$56 $86 $136
BMC 14.52.050
A
Meter Street: Expired Meter $64 $94 $144
BMC 14.52.050
A
FD Meter Street: Expired Meter $97 $127 $177
BMC 14.52.050
B
Pay & Display Station Expired Time $64 $94 $144
BMC 14.52.050
B
FD Pay & Display Sta Expired Time $97 $127 $177
BMC 14.52.050
C
Pay by Plate Station Expired Time $64 $94 $144
BMC 14.52.050
C
FD Pay by Plate Station Expired
Time
$97 $127 $177
BMC 14.52.060
A
Meter St: Extending Meter Time $64 $94 $144
BMC 14.52.060
A
FD Meter St: Extending Meter Time $97 $127 $177
BMC 14.52.060
B
Pay & Display Station Extend Time $64 $94 $144
BMC 14.52.060
B
FD Pay & Display Sta Extend Time $97 $127 $177
BMC 14.52.060
C
Pay by Plate Station Extend Time $64 $94 $144
BMC 14.52.060
C
FD Pay by Plate Sta Extend Time $97 $127 $177
BMC 14.52.063 P&D Dispensing Mach Tkt Not
Displayed
$64 $94 $144

Page 47 of 518 ends

Page 471 ends

Code Section Violation Description
(For citations issued to a vehicle)
FD = Football Game Days 9 a.m. to
11 p.m.

FD fines = 50% higher on most
violations &
at least 100% higher for violations in
RPP Zone A
Fine
Amount
On
Day
28 +$30
On
Day
47 +$50
BMC 14.52.063 FD P&D Dispens Mach Tkt Not
Displayed
$97 $127 $177
BMC 14.52.066 Improper Display of P&D Disp Mach
Tkt
$64 $94 $144
BMC 14.52.066 FD Improper Display of P&D Disp
Mach Tkt
$97 $127 $177
CVC 4000 Expired Registration $75 $105 $155
CVC 4461 B Improper Lending of DP Placard or
Plate
$820 $850 $900
CVC 4461 C Improper Display of DP Placard or
Plate
$820 $850 $900
CVC 4461 D Improper Use of DP Placard or Plate $820 $850 $900 CVC 4463 C Use of Forged, Counterfeit, or False
DP Placard or Plate
$820 $850 $900
CVC 5200 Missing License Plates $37 $67 $117
CVC 5201 Lic Plates Improperly Positioned $37 $67 $117
CVC 5201 B Temp license plate displayed/perm
plate assigned (read back)
$37 $67 $117
CVC 5202 Hanging/Detached License Plate $80 $110 $160
CVC 21113 A Parking on Public Grounds $80 $110 $160
CVC 21211 B Vehicle Blocking Bicycle Lane $80 $110 $160

Page 48 of 518 ends

Page 472 ends

Code Section Violation Description
(For citations issued to a vehicle)
FD = Football Game Days 9 a.m. to
11 p.m.

FD fines = 50% higher on most
violations &
at least 100% higher for violations in
RPP Zone A
Fine
Amount
On
Day
28 +$30
On
Day
47 +$50
CVC 21718 Parking on Freeway $89 $119 $169
CVC 22500 A Parking in an Intersection $89 $119 $169
CVC 22500 A FD Parking in an Intersection $128 $158 $208 CVC 22500 B Parking in Crosswalk $89 $119 $169
CVC 22500 B FD Parking in Crosswalk $134 $164 $214
CVC 22500 C Parking in Safety Zone $89 $119 $169
CVC 22500 C FD Parking in Safety Zone $134 $164 $214
CVC 22500 D Parking within 15' of Fire Station $89 $119 $169 CVC 22500 D FD Parking within 15' of Fire Station $134 $164 $214 CVC 22500 E Parking in Driveway $89 $119 $169
CVC 22500 E FD Parking in Driveway $134 $164 $214
CVC 22500 F Parking On/Across Sidewalk $89 $119 $169
CVC 22500 F FD Parking On/Across Sidewalk $134 $164 $214 CVC 22500 G Parking Construction No Permit $89 $119 $169 CVC 22500 G FD Parking Construction No Permit $134 $164 $214 CVC 22500 H Double-Parked $89 $119 $169
CVC 22500 H FD Double-Parked $134 $164 $214
CVC 22500 I Parking/Stopping in Coach Zone $392 $422 $472 CVC 22500 J Parking in Tunnel $80 $110 $160
CVC 22500 K Parking on Bridge $80 $110 $160
CVC 22500 L Blocking Disabled Ramp $429 $459 $509

Page 49 of 518 ends

Page 473 ends

Code Section Violation Description
(For citations issued to a vehicle)
FD = Football Game Days 9 a.m. to
11 p.m.

FD fines = 50% higher on most
violations &
at least 100% higher for violations in
RPP Zone A
Fine
Amount
On
Day
28 +$30
On
Day
47 +$50
CVC 22502 A Parking Over 18" from Curb 2-Way
St
$103 $133 $183
CVC 22502 A FD Parking Over 18" from Curb 2-
Way St
$155 $185 $235
CVC 22503 E Parking Over 10" from Curb 1-Way
St
$86 $116 $166
CVC 22507.8 A Parking in Disabled Zone $452 $482 $532
CVC 22507.8 B Obstructing Access Disabled Zone $452 $482 $532 CVC 22514 a Parking within 15' of Fire Hydrant $116 $146 $196 CVC 22514 a FD Parking within 15' of Fire Hydrant $174 $204 $254 CVC 22521 Parking within 7.5' of Railroad
Tracks
$80 $110 $160
CVC 22522 Parking within 3' of Wheelchair
Ramp
$452 $482 $532
CVC 22523 a Abandon Vehicle on Highway $250 $280 $330
CVC 22523 b Abandon Vehicle on Pub/Prvt Prop $250 $280 $330 CVC 22500 n No Parking Within 20’ of Crosswalk $66 $96 $146 CVC 22500 n FD No Parking Within 20’ of
Crosswalk
$99 $129 $179
CVC 22500 n No Parking Within 15’ of Crosswalk
with Curb Extension
$66 $96 $146
CVC 22500 n FD No Parking Within 15’ of
Crosswalk with Curb Extension
$99 $129 $179

Page 50 of 518 ends

Page 474 ends

Note: In addition to citation placed on vehicle, “Notice of Violation” is mailed to registered owner seven (7) days after citation and indicated when the fine penalty increases will occur: On Day 28 after citation issuance, the fine increases by $30. If payment is not received within 45 days after issuance, on Day 47, the fine increases by an additional $50.

Page 51 of 518 ends

Page 475 ends

Page 52 of 518 ends

Page 476 ends

1 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential
Adjustments
March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM
Contents
i. Summary of responses 2
ii. Survey questions 10
iii. Individual responses 12

Page 53 of 518 ends

Page 477 ends

Summary Of Responses
As of March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM, this forum had: Topic Start Topic End Attendees: 797 March 4, 2026, 2:56 PM March 18, 2026, 5:00 PM Responses: 669
Hours of Public Comment: 33.5
QUESTION 1

1. Our parking management strategy aims to balance the needs of residents, visitors, and businesses. Select how strongly you agree or disagree with each program goal:

AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination. % Count
Strongly disagree

6.9% 46
Disagree

8.4% 56
Neutral

19.7% 132
Agree

32.4% 217
Strongly agree

32.6% 218
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking. % Count
Strongly disagree

6.4% 43
Disagree

8.2% 55
Neutral

20.6% 138
Agree

32.4% 217
2 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 54 of 518 ends

Page 478 ends

% Count
Strongly agree

32.3% 216
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.
% Count
Strongly disagree

6.9% 46
Disagree

16.0% 107
Neutral

26.0% 174
Agree

31.5% 211
Strongly agree

19.6% 131
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double-parking.
% Count
Strongly disagree

7.3% 49
Disagree

6.9% 46
Neutral

12.0% 80
Agree

28.6% 191
Strongly agree

45.3% 303
QUESTION 2
What are your thoughts on the Evening Meter Hours proposal? % Count
I support this proposal

35.6% 238
3 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 55 of 518 ends

Page 479 ends

% Count
I oppose this proposal

53.1% 355
I am unsure of this proposal/I need more
information

11.2% 75
QUESTION 3
What are your thoughts on the Sunday Paid Parking proposal? % Count
I support this proposal

43.0% 287
I oppose this proposal

48.7% 325
I am unsure of this proposal/I need more
information

8.4% 56
QUESTION 4
What are your thoughts on the Geographic Expansion proposal? % Count
I support this proposal

37.6% 251
I oppose this proposal

43.8% 292
I am unsure of this proposal/I need more
information

18.6% 124
QUESTION 5
What are your thoughts on the Modernizing Payment Hardware (Cashless Transition) proposal? % Count
I support this proposal

70.2% 469
4 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 56 of 518 ends

Page 480 ends

% Count
I oppose this proposal

16.9% 113
I am unsure of this proposal/I need more
information

12.9% 86
QUESTION 6
What are your thoughts on the Transparent Service Fees proposal? % Count
I support this proposal

46.8% 313
I oppose this proposal

33.3% 223
I am unsure of this proposal/I need more
information

19.9% 133
QUESTION 7
Would you support the creation of this Prepaid "Frequent Parker" permit? % Count
I would support this

40.7% 272
I would not support this

33.2% 222
I am unsure of this/I need more information

26.2% 175
QUESTION 8
If you were to purchase an annual permit that allowed unlimited parking at City meters, would you be willing to pay between $4,000-$6,000 for this convenience?
% Count
Yes, I would be willing to pay this amount

8.2% 55
5 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 57 of 518 ends

Page 481 ends

% Count
No, I would not be willing to pay this amount

91.8% 614
QUESTION 9
Which of the following would make you more likely to use the Center Street Garage instead of searching for street parking?
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes
% Count
Very unlikely

6.4% 43
Unlikely

9.4% 63
Neutral

18.6% 124
Likely

31.0% 207
Very likely

34.6% 231
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence
% Count
Very unlikely

4.5% 30
Unlikely

7.8% 52
Neutral

31.7% 212
Likely

33.1% 221
Very likely

22.9% 153
Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain 6 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 58 of 518 ends

Page 482 ends

% Count
Very unlikely

2.7% 18
Unlikely

3.9% 26
Neutral

13.5% 90
Likely

43.3% 289
Very likely

36.7% 245
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians % Count
Very unlikely

3.7% 25
Unlikely

7.5% 50
Neutral

28.3% 189
Likely

35.5% 237
Very likely

25.0% 167
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters % Count
Very unlikely

2.4% 16
Unlikely

2.2% 15
Neutral

9.6% 64
Likely

26.5% 177
Very likely

59.3% 396
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services 7 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 59 of 518 ends

Page 483 ends

% Count
Very unlikely

17.4% 116
Unlikely

12.4% 83
Neutral

43.3% 289
Likely

14.8% 99
Very likely

12.1% 81
QUESTION 10

9. What is your relationship to Berkeley?
% Count
Resident

86.8% 581
Employee

8.5% 57
Student

1.6% 11
Business Owner

4.6% 31
Visitor

5.2% 35
Other

3.3% 22
QUESTION 11

10. How do you usually travel to Berkeley's commercial districts, such as Downtown Berkeley, Elmwood, Southside, Gilman, Solano, and others?
% Count
Drive alone

59.5% 396
8 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 60 of 518 ends

Page 484 ends

% Count
Rideshare

9.9% 66
Take public transit

13.8% 92
Walk

26.8% 178
Ride bicycle

19.1% 127
Other

10.7% 71
QUESTION 12

11. What is your Zip Code?
Answered 660
Skipped 9
94530 94550 94564 94608 94609 94611 94618 94702 94703 94704 94705 94706 94707 94708 94709 94710 9 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 61 of 518 ends

Page 485 ends

Survey Questions
QUESTION 1

1. Our parking management strategy aims to balance the needs of residents, visitors, and businesses. Select how strongly you agree or disagree with each program goal:

Row choices
• AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.
• SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.
• ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high- demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.
• SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.

Column choices
• Strongly disagree
• Disagree
• Neutral
• Agree
• Strongly agree
QUESTION 2
What are your thoughts on the Evening Meter Hours proposal? • I support this proposal
• I oppose this proposal
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
QUESTION 3
What are your thoughts on the Sunday Paid Parking proposal? • I support this proposal
• I oppose this proposal
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
QUESTION 4
What are your thoughts on the Geographic Expansion proposal? • I support this proposal
• I oppose this proposal
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
QUESTION 5
What are your thoughts on the Modernizing Payment Hardware (Cashless Transition) proposal?
• I support this proposal
• I oppose this proposal
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
QUESTION 6
What are your thoughts on the Transparent Service Fees proposal? • I support this proposal
• I oppose this proposal
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
QUESTION 7
Would you support the creation of this Prepaid "Frequent Parker" permit?
• I would support this
• I would not support this
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
QUESTION 8
If you were to purchase an annual permit that allowed unlimited parking at City meters, would you be willing to pay between $4,000- $6,000 for this convenience?
• Yes, I would be willing to pay this amount
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
QUESTION 9
Which of the following would make you more likely to use the Center Street Garage instead of searching for street parking?
Row choices
• Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes
• Brighter lighting and more visible security presence
10 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 62 of 518 ends

Page 486 ends

• Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain
• Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians
• Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters
• More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services Column choices
• Very unlikely
• Unlikely
• Neutral
• Likely
• Very likely
QUESTION 10

9. What is your relationship to Berkeley?
• Resident
• Employee
• Student
• Business Owner
• Visitor
• Other
QUESTION 11

10. How do you usually travel to Berkeley's commercial districts, such as Downtown Berkeley, Elmwood, Southside, Gilman, Solano, and others?
• Drive alone
• Rideshare
• Take public transit
• Walk
• Ride bicycle
• Other
QUESTION 12

11. What is your Zip Code?
11 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 63 of 518 ends

Page 487 ends

Individual Responses
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:05 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Disagree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Strongly agree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Neutral
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Neutral
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Walk
Question 12
94707
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:06 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Agree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Page 64 of 518 ends

Page 488 ends

Question 5
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Neutral
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94705
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:06 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Neutral
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 7
• I would not support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
13 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 65 of 518 ends

Page 489 ends

• Walk
Question 12
No response
Name not shown
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:06 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Disagree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Disagree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Neutral
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94710
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:10 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
14 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 66 of 518 ends

Page 490 ends

• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 5
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Likely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Ride bicycle
Question 12
94703
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:10 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Agree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Neutral
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I oppose this proposal
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
15 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 67 of 518 ends

Page 491 ends

• Employee
Question 11
• Drive alone
• Rideshare
• Walk
Question 12
94705
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:10 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Disagree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Very likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Very likely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Other - Usually with one other person
Question 12
94707
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:11 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Agree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Strongly disagree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
16 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 68 of 518 ends

Page 492 ends

Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I oppose this proposal
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Very likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94709
Name not shown
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:11 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Strongly agree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• Yes, I would be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street 17 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 69 of 518 ends

Page 493 ends

meters: Likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Very likely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Take public transit
• Ride bicycle
Question 12
94702
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:11 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Agree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Disagree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I oppose this proposal
Question 6
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Unlikely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Unlikely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94705
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:12 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
18 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 70 of 518 ends

Page 494 ends

Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 4
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Ride bicycle
Question 12
94703
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:12 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Agree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Disagree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
19 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 71 of 518 ends

Page 495 ends

Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Employee
Question 11
• Rideshare
Question 12
94602
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:12 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Agree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Disagree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94703
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:13 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
20 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 72 of 518 ends

Page 496 ends

Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Other - Walk to the areas close to me and drive to the others Question 12
94704
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:13 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Strongly disagree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Neutral
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I oppose this proposal
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Very likely
21 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 73 of 518 ends

Page 497 ends

Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Very likely
Question 10
• Resident
• Business Owner
Question 11
• Drive alone
• Take public transit
• Walk
Question 12
94707
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:14 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Neutral
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Walk
Question 12
94705
Name not shown
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:15 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree 22 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 74 of 518 ends

Page 498 ends

SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 7
• I would not support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Likely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Rideshare
Question 12
94708
Name not shown
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:15 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Disagree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Neutral
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
23 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 75 of 518 ends

Page 499 ends

Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Other - I walk, drive, or take bicycle
Question 12
94708
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:15 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Agree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 3
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 4
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Rideshare
Question 12
94707
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:16 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing 24 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 76 of 518 ends

Page 500 ends

distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Visitor
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94706
Name not shown
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:16 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Agree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Strongly disagree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I would not support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
25 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 77 of 518 ends

Page 501 ends

Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Very likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Unlikely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94708
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:18 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Disagree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I would not support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Ride bicycle
Question 12
94703
Name not available
outside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:18 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Disagree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
26 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 78 of 518 ends

Page 502 ends

ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would not support this
Question 8
• Yes, I would be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Employee
• Visitor
• Other - Former student
Question 11
• Rideshare
• Take public transit
• Walk
• Ride bicycle
Question 12
94609
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:18 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
27 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 79 of 518 ends

Page 503 ends

• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Very unlikely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94707
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:18 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 6
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 7
• I would not support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Very likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Visitor
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94530
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:19 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the 28 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 80 of 518 ends

Page 504 ends

time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Strongly agree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• Yes, I would be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Employee
Question 11
• Other - Drive with family
Question 12
94530
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:19 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Disagree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Disagree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
29 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 81 of 518 ends

Page 505 ends

Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
• Take public transit
• Walk
• Ride bicycle
Question 12
94710
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:19 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Agree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Other - Live and work in Berkeley
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94703
Name not shown
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:19 PM
Question 1
30 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 82 of 518 ends

Page 506 ends

AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Strongly disagree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Disagree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I oppose this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would not support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94703
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:21 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly disagree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
31 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 83 of 518 ends

Page 507 ends

Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Very likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94709
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:21 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly disagree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Strongly agree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would not support this
Question 8
• Yes, I would be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very unlikely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Unlikely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Ride bicycle
Question 12
94702
Name not shown
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:22 PM
32 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 84 of 518 ends

Page 508 ends

Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Agree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would not support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94709
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:24 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
33 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 85 of 518 ends

Page 509 ends

Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Neutral
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94708
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:24 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Agree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Unlikely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Unlikely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Unlikely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Likely
Question 10
• Resident
• Employee
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94708
Name not shown
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:27 PM
Question 1
34 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 86 of 518 ends

Page 510 ends

AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would not support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Neutral
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Ride bicycle
Question 12
94703
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:27 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Disagree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Disagree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I would not support this
35 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 87 of 518 ends

Page 511 ends

Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Other - I am in three categories and your form doesn't let me show that.

Question 11
• Other - I use all means depending on what I am needing to do.

Question 12
94707
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:27 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly disagree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very unlikely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Neutral
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very unlikely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
• Employee
• Student
Question 11
• Walk
Question 12
94709
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
36 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 88 of 518 ends

Page 512 ends

March 4, 2026, 5:28 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Other - Drive to most; Walk to one
Question 12
94702
Name not shown
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:29 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Disagree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Page 89 of 518 ends

Page 513 ends

Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Unlikely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
• Take public transit
• Walk
Question 12
94703
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:29 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Strongly agree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Unlikely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Very likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Unlikely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Very unlikely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
• Take public transit
Question 12
94707
38 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 90 of 518 ends

Page 514 ends

Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:29 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly disagree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Strongly disagree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly disagree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Very likely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94703
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:30 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Agree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Disagree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
39 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 91 of 518 ends

Page 515 ends

Question 6
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
• Take public transit
• Walk
Question 12
No response
Name not shown
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:31 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Strongly agree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I oppose this proposal
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
40 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 92 of 518 ends

Page 516 ends

• Drive alone
Question 12
94710
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:31 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Disagree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Disagree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly disagree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I oppose this proposal
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
No response
Name not shown
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:31 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Agree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
41 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 93 of 518 ends

Page 517 ends

• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 7
• I would not support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Unlikely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Unlikely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Very unlikely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94702
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:32 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Disagree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Neutral
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 7
• I would not support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Neutral
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
42 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 94 of 518 ends

Page 518 ends

Question 11
• Take public transit
• Walk
Question 12
94702
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:32 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Agree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Disagree
Question 2
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I would not support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Unlikely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94708
Name not shown
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:33 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Neutral
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
43 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 95 of 518 ends

Page 519 ends

• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Very likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Very likely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
• Rideshare
Question 12
94702
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:37 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Disagree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would not support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Very likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
44 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 96 of 518 ends

Page 520 ends

• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94708
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:39 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Unlikely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Unlikely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Unlikely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
• Employee
Question 11
• Drive alone
• Ride bicycle
Question 12
94703
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:39 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Disagree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 3
45 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 97 of 518 ends

Page 521 ends

• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very unlikely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Likely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Rideshare
Question 12
94707
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:43 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Agree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Very likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Neutral
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Very likely
46 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 98 of 518 ends

Page 522 ends

Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94710
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:43 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Strongly disagree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Neutral
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very unlikely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very unlikely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Unlikely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Unlikely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Unlikely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Very unlikely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94707
Name not shown
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:45 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Agree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
47 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 99 of 518 ends

Page 523 ends

• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Neutral
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94702
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:46 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Agree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Neutral
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Unlikely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Unlikely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Unlikely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Neutral
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Unlikely
48 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 100 of 518 ends

Page 524 ends

Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
• Walk
Question 12
94702
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:46 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Strongly agree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Very likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
• Take public transit
• Walk
Question 12
94707
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:47 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Disagree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Disagree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
49 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 101 of 518 ends

Page 525 ends

Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Unlikely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Neutral
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Ride bicycle
Question 12
94703
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:50 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Strongly agree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would not support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Unlikely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Unlikely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Unlikely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:
50 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 102 of 518 ends

Page 526 ends

Unlikely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Unlikely
Question 10
• Resident
• Employee
Question 11
• Drive alone
• Take public transit
Question 12
94705
Name not shown
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:50 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Very likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Likely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Rideshare
Question 12
94709
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:52 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:
51 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 103 of 518 ends

Page 527 ends

Strongly agree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would not support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very unlikely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Likely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Other - bike during the day, drive at night
Question 12
94705
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:53 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Agree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Disagree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Neutral
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I oppose this proposal
Question 6
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
52 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 104 of 518 ends

Page 528 ends

Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Unlikely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Unlikely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Other - Combo of driving with or without spouse, bike riding, and walking
Question 12
94707
Name not shown
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:54 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Strongly agree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Neutral
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Unlikely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94702
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:55 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
53 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 105 of 518 ends

Page 529 ends

SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I oppose this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Very likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94709
Name not shown
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:56 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Disagree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I oppose this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
54 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 106 of 518 ends

Page 530 ends

Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Neutral
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Walk
• Ride bicycle
Question 12
94703
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:57 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• Yes, I would be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Likely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Take public transit
Question 12
94703
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 5:57 PM
55 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 107 of 518 ends

Page 531 ends

Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• Yes, I would be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Very unlikely
Question 10
• Resident
• Employee
Question 11
• Drive alone
• Ride bicycle
Question 12
94702
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 5:58 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Disagree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Strongly disagree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Disagree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
56 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 108 of 518 ends

Page 532 ends

Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Very likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Unlikely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
• Walk
Question 12
94709
Name not shown
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 6:02 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Take public transit
• Walk
Question 12
94703
57 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 109 of 518 ends

Page 533 ends

Name not available
March 4, 2026, 6:02 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Neutral
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94708
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 6:04 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Page 110 of 518 ends

Page 534 ends

• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very unlikely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Very likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94702
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 6:04 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Disagree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly disagree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 6
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 7
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 8
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 9
• Resident
Question 10
• Drive alone
Question 11
94710
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
59 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 111 of 518 ends

Page 535 ends

March 4, 2026, 6:04 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Agree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Very likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94705
Name not shown
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 6:11 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Strongly agree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
60 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 112 of 518 ends

Page 536 ends

• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Unlikely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94705
Name not available
outside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 6:14 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Neutral
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I would not support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Very likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Other - Resident of Rockridge
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94618
61 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 113 of 518 ends

Page 537 ends

Name not available
March 4, 2026, 6:17 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Agree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Disagree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Unlikely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Unlikely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Unlikely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
• Walk
Question 12
94703
Name not available
March 4, 2026, 6:17 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Agree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Page 114 of 518 ends

Page 538 ends

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Very unlikely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Rideshare
Question 12
94703
Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 6:18 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Very likely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94703
63 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 115 of 518 ends

Page 539 ends

Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 6:19 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 3
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 4
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• Yes, I would be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Very likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Likely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94708
Name not available
outside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 6:20 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Strongly agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
64 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 116 of 518 ends

Page 540 ends

• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 7
• I would not support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Unlikely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Neutral
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Visitor
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94080
Name not available
outside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 6:20 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 6
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 7
• I am unsure of this/I need more information
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Unlikely
Question 10
• Visitor
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94707
65 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 117 of 518 ends

Page 541 ends

Name not available
March 4, 2026, 6:22 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Strongly disagree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I would not support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Unlikely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94708
Name not shown
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 6:24 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Strongly agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Disagree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Neutral
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I oppose this proposal
Question 6
66 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 118 of 518 ends

Page 542 ends

• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I would not support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very likely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Very likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Very unlikely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Rideshare
Question 12
94702
Name not shown
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 6:25 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Neutral
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Neutral
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Neutral
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I oppose this proposal
Question 6
• I oppose this proposal
Question 7
• I would not support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Very unlikely Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Very unlikely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Very unlikely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Very unlikely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very unlikely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Very unlikely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94708
67 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 119 of 518 ends

Page 543 ends

Name not available
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 6:26 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Agree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.:

Disagree
SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I oppose this proposal
Question 3
• I oppose this proposal
Question 4
• I oppose this proposal
Question 5
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 6
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 7
• I would not support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Likely
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Likely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Very likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Drive alone
Question 12
94702
Name not shown
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 6:27 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Neutral
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Strongly agree ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
68 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 120 of 518 ends

Page 544 ends

• I am unsure of this proposal/I need more information
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• No, I would not be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Neutral Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Neutral
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Neutral
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Neutral
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Neutral
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Other - I live near downtown so I usually walk. All other locatons I drive, frequently alone
Question 12
94709
Name not shown
inside City Council Districts
March 4, 2026, 6:27 PM
Question 1
AVAILABILITY: Make it easier to find a parking space near your destination.: Agree
SUSTAINABILITY: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the time drivers spend "circling" for parking.: Disagree
ECONOMIC VITALITY: Increase "turnover" of parked cars in high-demand areas so more customers can access local shops and restaurants.: Agree SAFETY: Improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists by reducing distracted driving (drivers looking for parking spaces) and double- parking.: Agree
Question 2
• I support this proposal
Question 3
• I support this proposal
Question 4
• I support this proposal
Question 5
• I support this proposal
Question 6
• I support this proposal
Question 7
• I would support this
Question 8
• Yes, I would be willing to pay this amount
Question 9
Free garage parking for the first 20 minutes: Neutral
Brighter lighting and more visible security presence: Unlikely Real-time signs on Shattuck Avenue showing exactly how many spaces remain: Likely
Improved signage at nearby streets and clearer exit paths for pedestrians:

Likely
Lower hourly rates for the first 2 hours compared to nearby street meters: Likely
More Electric Vehicle charging stations or expanded bike valet services:

Unlikely
Question 10
• Resident
Question 11
• Ride bicycle
Question 12
94705
69 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14889 Created with OpenGov | March 18, 2026, 5:06 PM Parking Management Program Potential Adjustments
Weigh in on proposals to improve availability and efficiency of on-street parking in high-demand areas.

Page 121 of 518 ends

Berkeley City CouncilJune 9, 2026

Berkeley City Council
June 9, 2026