Item E-2 Agenda Report — Beverly Hills City Council, June 21, 2022 (part 2 of 4)

identified both interior and exterior character-defining features for the property to help guide ongoing planning efforts.

Whittier Public Library, Whittier CA. Senior Architectural Historian. Alison was the lead author of the Historic Resources Assessment which determined that the library is significant as an individual resource under National Register Criteria A and C. Constructed in 1958, the property is significant for its association with MidCentury Modernism, postwar period institutional properties, and architect William Henry Harrison. Alison assembled the construction history for the library and the Whittier Civic Center. She created a detailed character-defining features analysis identifying significant and contributing features at the property’s interior, exterior, and site. Alison coordinated with the project architect to ensure that the project met the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards (SOI) in order to meet community’s contemporary needs while respecting the building’s historic character. Alison authored and oversaw the production of a HABS report to document the library building prior to selective demolition and project construction.

Benjamin Franklin Elementary School Historic Resource Evaluation and Mitigated Negative Declaration, San Diego, CA. Senior Architectural Historian.

Alison conducted an HRA for the 1930s, 40s, and 50s-designed elementary school campus. The property was found to be a historic district eligible for its association with the post-war development of the Kensington neighborhood, and for its association with two master San Diego architects. The proposed project was reviewed for compliance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, and a CEQA analysis was performed, resulting in the Mitigation Measures and design considerations for future construction within the district. Alison authored and oversaw the production of a HABS report to document the campus and its buildings prior to project construction.
1202 3rd Street Promenade Preservation Consulting, Santa Monica, CA. Senior Architectural Historian. Constructed in 1949 as a JC Penny department store, the commercial building was designed in the Late Moderne style. ESA previously worked to produce a Landmark Assessment Report, and today, the property is recognized as a City of Santa Monica Landmark. Alison conducted a SOI Standards conformance review of a proposed tenant improvement project for a Certificate of Appropriateness.
1221 Hermosa Avenue Preservation Consulting, Hermosa Beach, CA. Senior Architectural Historian. ESA serves as a historic preservation consultant to the City of Hermosa Beach, and has a longstanding relationship with the building at 1221 Hermosa Boulevard, known as the Bijou Building. The building is a former historic theatre and bank designed in the NeoClassical Revival style, constructed in 1923.

Alison evaluated proposed tenant improvement modifications including the removal of non-original features and the retention of original features related to original theatre and bank uses. Alison has conducted design reviews which included an understanding of all modifications to the space over time, characterdefining features analyses, and reviews of proposed plans against CEQA thresholds and the SOI Standards for compliance. Alison is currently participating with overseeing the construction monitoring efforts for the theatre space as part of this ongoing project.

Alison Garcia Kellar, M.S.

Page 3 ends

Universal Hilton Historic Resources Technical Report and Environmental Impacts Report for 555 W Universal Terrace Parkway, Los Angeles, CA. Senior Architectural Historian. The Universal Hilton Hotel was designed by master architect, William L. Pereira in 1983 in the Postmodern style. As one of Pereira’s final commissions, the hotel building was originally part of a master plan and was designed to accommodate visitors to the expanding Universal Theme Parks.

Alison conducted in-depth architect and postmodern style research, and evaluated the property for historic significance as part of the Historic Resources Technical Report.

Los Cerritos Wetlands Restoration Plan Program, Cultural Resource Assessment, Seal Beach, CA. Senior Architectural Historian. The Los Cerritos Wetlands Restoration EIR project will reinstate historic wetlands to a previously developed oil rig/production site that has been in operation since the early 20th century. As part of the larger restoration plan program, ESA was hired to conduct a cultural resources study to observe, document, and prepare preliminary mitigation measures related to identified built environment resources. Alison collaborated with the archeology team during a field visit to identify potential sites for later investigative studies. She reviewed historic aerial photographs, and conducted research to determine the companies and general ages of oil-industry related infrastructure including oil rigs, operations sheds, and decommissioned tank farms. Mitigation recommendations presented for the structures included Historic Resource Assessment reports to be conducted in the future. 3325 Monterey Road CEQA Impacts Analysis and Design Review, San Marino, California. Senior Architectural Historian. A two-story Art Deco style single-family residence, constructed in 1927 in San Marino, California was determined to be a historic resource. Proposed modifications to the residence included a two-story rear addition and building rehabilitation. Alison assisted with preservation design consultation and conducted a plan review for conformance with the SOI Standards for the proposed project. She coordinated with the project architect to better convey preservation components of the proposed work into the drawing set for city review. The review required a character-defining features analysis to determine the level of significance of the remaining features.

Golden Gate Village Historic Resource Evaluation, Marin City, CA. Architectural Historian. The highly-intact Golden Gate Village low-income housing complex was constructed in 1958 to house many of the former Marinship workers and their families. Designed by prominent mid-century designers including Aaron G. Green, John Carl Warnecke, and Lawrence Halprin, the property serves as an example of a well-designed housing complex, significant as a product of post-war urban development and for its prominent mid-century designers. Alison performed the site visit and conducted research through local and private archival repositories, plan analysis, and interviews, to produce the report narrative and historic evaluation for the property. Today, the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.

McDonnell Hall/Our Lady of Guadalupe Chapel Historic Structure Report, San Jose, CA. Architectural Historian. Constructed as a parish church in 1914, the building moved to its current location in 1953. Here, the building served as a Alison Garcia Kellar, M.S.

Page 4 ends

newly formed Catholic Mission, the Center of Our Lady of Guadalupe. The property is associated with civil rights activist and labor rights leader Cesar Chavez, and the mid-20th century Mexican American civil rights movement. Alison assisted with the research, production, and design recommendations, including bringing the building back to its appearance during its period of significance, which required a meticulous analysis of the building’s historic integrity. The property today is listed as a National Historic Landmark.

Historic YMCA Hotel Preservation Consulting in the Embarcadero, San Francisco, CA. Senior Architectural Historian, Project Manager. Built in the early 20th century, the building was formerly a YMCA hotel used by young navy men and is currently a hotel along the waterfront with an adjacent YMCA recreational center. The hotel was proposing modifications which included rehabilitation work and reconfiguring the interior lobby space. Alison researched and documented the interior evolution by reviewing old plans, movies filmed on-location, post cards, and existing fabric. She established the building’s construction chronology with a focus on the building’s public spaces at the interior, overseeing the entire production of the report and created recommendations to update the client’s proposed plans which included acceptable sensitive modifications to historic features and recommendations for potential future demolition.

Palo Alto History Museum Historic Preservation Consulting, Palo Alto, CA.

Architectural Historian. The Spanish Revival style Roth Building was the original location of the Palo Alto Medical Foundation. The former medical building is undergoing a conversion into a local history museum with gallery space, interpretive areas, and archival and study rooms. Alison assisted with secondary research efforts of both the medical foundation and the building, upon modifications to the museum’s scope of work. She conducted a Part 2 Federal historic rehabilitation tax credit application review which included recommendation to best comply with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Historic Preservation.

Half Moon Bay Barn and Jail Museum Historic Resource Evaluation and Preservation Consulting, Half Moon Bay, CA. Senior Architectural Historian. The City of Half Moon Bay was working with a local historical society to implement a history museum at the site of its early 20th century jail and adjacent barn. Alison conducted an in-depth historic resource assessment then reviewed proposed plans for buildings and site modifications to accommodate gallery space, offices, and archival storage. Coordinating with project architects, she assisted with the creation of recommendations for project compliance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation.

Toscano Hotel Preservation Consulting, Sonoma State Historic Park, Sonoma, CA. Senior Architectural Historian. The two-story wood framed Toscano Hotel was constructed in the 1850s and is a contributing resource to the Sonoma Plaza National Historic Landmark District and the Sonoma Plaza National Register Historic District. Alison conducted a Secretary of the Interior’s Standards reviews of proposed changes to the interior of the building. Proposed changes included the conversion of a portion of the building from a hotel saloon museum display area into a retail concession area for the California State Parks. Project recommendations included sensitive design solutions to maintain original features.

Appendix B
Tract Map

Appendix C.1
Building Permits: 1001 North
Roxbury Drive

PERMIT NO : 87002206 PROJECT NO : P8804535 TYPE : BLDG
ADDRESS : 1001 N ROXBURY DR STATUS : FINAL
APPL : 05/11/1987 APPR : 05/11/1987 COMP : 11/23/1988 EXP :

VALUATION : $25,000.00 P/R/E : KH
APPLICANT : SODERSTROM,RON
ADDRESS : 1001 N ROXBURY DR
PHONE : 818-789-8168
OWNER : KOHL,ALLEN
ADDITIONAL INFO : OTHER BUILDING INFO: BLDG.TYPE5NR,
GRP&DIV.R-3,
ZONE R-1,

PLAN ON FILE-YES
C: FLORES L & J CEMENT CONTRACTOR 302174 87004450 BLDG
E: FERGUSON JOHN B S-000690 87002206 BLDG
C: LEVEY MICHAEL H 256350 87002206 BLDG
C: CAREY RICHARD LEE 408232 87006021 ELEC
C: ENLIGHTENING ELECTRIC 467906 87003860 ELEC
C: PAGEANT OUTDOOR LIGHTING EQUIP 480833 87003311 ELEC
C: HONEYWELL PROTECTION SERVICES 052926 87002601 ELEC
C: ENLIGHTENING ELECTRIC 467906 87002354 ELEC
C: LEVEY MICHAEL H 256350 87002208 ELEC
C: K AIR CONDITIONING / BUILDING 292596 87003549 MECH
C: K AIR CONDITIONING / BUILDING 292596 87000624 MECH
C: M & S PLUMBING CO A CALIF CORP 185041 87003772 PLBG
C: LEVEY MICHAEL H 256350 87002207 PLBG
PERMIT TO DO : CHANGE LOCATION O SWIMMING PO OL(KPERMIT #861131) Fees
Fee description Units Fee/Units Ext Fee Data
PERMIT FEE #10 $428.65
Plan Check Fee #20 $214.33
TOT.FEES : $642.98 PAYMENTS : $642.98 CREDITS : $0.00
ADJUST : $0.00 BAL DUE : $0.00
Permits
Type Number Status Issue Date Comp. Date Payments Balance Due BLDG 87000553 FINAL 02/06/1987 08/11/1987 $718.73 $0.00 PERMIT TO DO: TENNIS COURT
MECH 87000624 FINAL 02/11/1987 08/31/1988 $36.60 $0.00
PERMIT TO DO: KITCHEN HOOD EXST AND OVEN VENT
PLBG 87002207 FINAL 05/11/1987 11/22/1988 $167.25 $0.00 PERMIT TO DO: CHANGE LOCATION OF SWIMMING POOL
ELEC 87002208 FINAL 05/11/1987 06/18/1987 $41.45 $0.00
PERMIT TO DO: LOCATION CHANGE OF SWIMMING PO OL
ELEC 87002354 FINAL 05/19/1987 11/15/1988 $793.95 $0.00 PERMIT TO DO: REMODEL
ELEC 87002601 FINAL 06/02/1987 11/10/1988 $189.20 $0.00 PERMIT TO DO: SMOKE AND HEAT DETECTORS
ELEC 87003311 FINAL 07/13/1987 07/27/1987 $33.20 $0.00
PERMIT TO DO: TENNIS COURT LIGHTING
MECH 87003549 FINAL 07/23/1987 09/22/1988 $154.80 $0.00 PERMIT TO DO: HVAC FOR POOL CABANA HVAC FOR POOL CABANA PLBG 87003772 FINAL 08/05/1987 10/11/1988 $51.15 $0.00
PERMIT TO DO: SEWER AND WATER SERVICE FOR POOL HOUSE
Type Number Status Issue Date Comp. Date Payments Balance Due ELEC 87003860 FINAL 08/10/1987 11/10/1988 $152.50 $0.00 PERMIT TO DO: ELECTRICAL IN CABANA
BLDG 87004450 FINAL 09/08/1987 11/23/1988 $449.10 $0.00 PERMIT TO DO: FOOTING AND SLAB FOR VIEW ANDOBSERVATION AREAS CHANGE VALUATION TO ELEC 87006021 FINAL 12/04/1987 11/10/1988 $85.90 $0.00
PERMIT TO DO: ELECTRICAL FOR SWIMMING POOL
Final

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: 87004450
Status: Final
07/29/2021
Building
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Parcel Number: Created By:

Project Number: P8804535 Applied: 09/08/1987
Project Description: Issued: 09/08/1987
Valuation: $1,500,000.00 Completed: 11/23/1988
Expiration: Updated By:

Owner:

Job Description: FOOTING AND SLAB FOR VIEW ANDOBSERVATION AREAS CHANGE

VALUATION TO

PROJECT INFORMATION
Square Feet (New): Dwelling Units (New): Zone: R-1.X
Square Feet (Existing): Dwelling Units (Existing): Primary Use:

Scope Category:

PEOPLE
Type Name Address Phone License

FINANCE
Group Activity Review Paid Balance
PERMIT_FEE_GROUP $449.10 $0.00 $449.10 $0.00
TOTAL $449.10 $0.00 $449.10 $0.00

TRANSACTIONS
ID Date Method Amount
603162 09/08/1987 12:00:00 AM CASH $134.25
603161 09/08/1987 12:00:00 AM CASH $314.85

PERMIT CONDITIONS
Final
NOTES
COVID-19 SAFETY FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE GUIDELINES
Per the Emergency Orders issued by the State of California and the County of Los Angeles in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, construction is currently permitted to continue in the City of Beverly Hills. This may change as circumstances continue to rapidly evolve day-to-day. All construction site in the City of Beverly Hills are required to comply with all applicable and the most current emergency orders established for the COVID19 health orders. Construction sites that create unsafe conditions may be denied inspections and asked to shut down until compliance is achieved.

The latest Construction Guidelines can be found online at www.beverlyhills.org/COVID19ConstructionGuidelines.

PERMIT NO : 87004450 PROJECT NO : P8804535 TYPE : BLDG
ADDRESS : 1001 N ROXBURY DR STATUS : FINAL
APPL : 09/08/1987 APPR : 09/08/1987 COMP : 11/23/1988 EXP :

VALUATION : $15,000.00 P/R/E : MK
APPLICANT : FLORES,JOSEPH
ADDRESS : 1001 N ROXBURY DR
PHONE : 818-365-5106
OWNER : KOHL,ALLEN
ADDITIONAL INFO : OTHER BUILDING INFO: PLAN IS ON FILE
C: FLORES L & J CEMENT CONTRACTOR 302174 87004450 BLDG
E: FERGUSON JOHN B S-000690 87002206 BLDG
C: LEVEY MICHAEL H 256350 87002206 BLDG
C: CAREY RICHARD LEE 408232 87006021 ELEC
C: ENLIGHTENING ELECTRIC 467906 87003860 ELEC
C: PAGEANT OUTDOOR LIGHTING EQUIP 480833 87003311 ELEC
C: HONEYWELL PROTECTION SERVICES 052926 87002601 ELEC
C: ENLIGHTENING ELECTRIC 467906 87002354 ELEC
C: LEVEY MICHAEL H 256350 87002208 ELEC
C: K AIR CONDITIONING / BUILDING 292596 87003549 MECH
C: K AIR CONDITIONING / BUILDING 292596 87000624 MECH
C: M & S PLUMBING CO A CALIF CORP 185041 87003772 PLBG
C: LEVEY MICHAEL H 256350 87002207 PLBG
PERMIT TO DO : FOOTING AND SLAB FOR VIEW ANDOBSERVATION AREAS CHANGE VALUATION TO Fees
Fee description Units Fee/Units Ext Fee Data
PERMIT FEE #10 $299.40
Plan Check Fee #20 $149.70
TOT.FEES : $449.10 PAYMENTS : $449.10 CREDITS : $0.00
ADJUST : $0.00 BAL DUE : $0.00
Permits
Type Number Status Issue Date Comp. Date Payments Balance Due BLDG 87000553 FINAL 02/06/1987 08/11/1987 $718.73 $0.00 PERMIT TO DO: TENNIS COURT
MECH 87000624 FINAL 02/11/1987 08/31/1988 $36.60 $0.00
PERMIT TO DO: KITCHEN HOOD EXST AND OVEN VENT
BLDG 87002206 FINAL 05/11/1987 11/23/1988 $642.98 $0.00 PERMIT TO DO: CHANGE LOCATION O SWIMMING PO OL(KPERMIT #861131) PLBG 87002207 FINAL 05/11/1987 11/22/1988 $167.25 $0.00 PERMIT TO DO: CHANGE LOCATION OF SWIMMING POOL
ELEC 87002208 FINAL 05/11/1987 06/18/1987 $41.45 $0.00
PERMIT TO DO: LOCATION CHANGE OF SWIMMING PO OL
ELEC 87002354 FINAL 05/19/1987 11/15/1988 $793.95 $0.00 PERMIT TO DO: REMODEL
ELEC 87002601 FINAL 06/02/1987 11/10/1988 $189.20 $0.00 PERMIT TO DO: SMOKE AND HEAT DETECTORS
ELEC 87003311 FINAL 07/13/1987 07/27/1987 $33.20 $0.00
PERMIT TO DO: TENNIS COURT LIGHTING
MECH 87003549 FINAL 07/23/1987 09/22/1988 $154.80 $0.00 PERMIT TO DO: HVAC FOR POOL CABANA HVAC FOR POOL CABANA PLBG 87003772 FINAL 08/05/1987 10/11/1988 $51.15 $0.00
PERMIT TO DO: SEWER AND WATER SERVICE FOR POOL HOUSE
Type Number Status Issue Date Comp. Date Payments Balance Due ELEC 87003860 FINAL 08/10/1987 11/10/1988 $152.50 $0.00 PERMIT TO DO: ELECTRICAL IN CABANA
ELEC 87006021 FINAL 12/04/1987 11/10/1988 $85.90 $0.00
PERMIT TO DO: ELECTRICAL FOR SWIMMING POOL
Comments
Date Entered By Comments
05/07/1988 CONVERT 15,000 FROM 10,000 PC APL:090887 PC APR:090887 PC CMP:090887 Final

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: 87000553
Status: Final
07/29/2021
Building
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Parcel Number: Created By:

Project Number: P8804535 Applied: 02/06/1987
Project Description: Issued: 02/06/1987
Valuation: $3,000,000.00 Completed: 08/11/1987
Expiration: Updated By:

Owner:

Job Description: TENNIS COURT

PROJECT INFORMATION
Square Feet (New): Dwelling Units (New): Zone: R-1.X
Square Feet (Existing): Dwelling Units (Existing): Primary Use:

Scope Category:

PEOPLE
Type Name Address Phone License

FINANCE
Group Activity Review Paid Balance
PERMIT_FEE_GROUP $718.73 $0.00 $718.73 $0.00
TOTAL $718.73 $0.00 $718.73 $0.00

TRANSACTIONS
ID Date Method Amount
599228 02/06/1987 12:00:00 AM CASH $355.48
599229 03/11/1987 12:00:00 AM CASH $363.25

The latest Construction Guidelines can be found online at www.beverlyhills.org/COVID19ConstructionGuidelines.

Approved

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: 90004634
Status: Approved
07/29/2021
Building
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Parcel Number: Created By:

Project Number: P9005195 Applied: 10/01/1990
Project Description: Issued: 10/01/1990
Valuation: $2,500,000.00 Completed:

Expiration: Updated By:

Owner:

Job Description: NEW SWIMMING POOL

PROJECT INFORMATION
Square Feet (New): Dwelling Units (New): Zone: R-1.X
Square Feet (Existing): Dwelling Units (Existing): Primary Use:

Scope Category:

PEOPLE
Type Name Address Phone License

FINANCE
Group Activity Review Paid Balance
PERMIT_FEE_GROUP $513.70 $0.00 $513.70 $0.00
TOTAL $513.70 $0.00 $513.70 $0.00

TRANSACTIONS
ID Date Method Amount
632755 10/01/1990 12:00:00 AM CASH $513.70

PERMIT CONDITIONS
Approved
NOTES
COVID-19 SAFETY FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE GUIDELINES
Per the Emergency Orders issued by the State of California and the County of Los Angeles in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, construction is currently permitted to continue in the City of Beverly Hills. This may change as circumstances continue to rapidly evolve day-to-day. All construction site in the City of Beverly Hills are required to comply with all applicable and the most current emergency orders established for the COVID19 health orders. Construction sites that create unsafe conditions may be denied inspections and asked to shut down until compliance is achieved.

The latest Construction Guidelines can be found online at www.beverlyhills.org/COVID19ConstructionGuidelines.

Page 1 of 2 ends

Final

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: 90004513
Status: Final
07/29/2021
Grading
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Parcel Number: Created By:

Project Number: P9005172 Applied: 09/21/1990
Project Description: 90%. Issued: 09/21/1990
Valuation: $0.00 Completed: 09/26/1990
Expiration: Updated By:

Owner:

Job Description: REMOVE EXIST.POOL & COMPACT TO 90%.

PEOPLE
Type Name Address Phone License

FINANCE
Group Activity Review Paid Balance
PERMIT_FEE_GROUP $168.70 $0.00 $168.70 $0.00
TOTAL $168.70 $0.00 $168.70 $0.00

TRANSACTIONS
ID Date Method Amount
632607 09/21/1990 12:00:00 AM CASH $168.70

PERMIT CONDITIONS
NOTES
COVID-19 SAFETY FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE GUIDELINES
Per the Emergency Orders issued by the State of California and the County of Los Angeles in

Page 2 of 2 ends

Final
response to the COVID-19 pandemic, construction is currently permitted to continue in the City of Beverly Hills. This may change as circumstances continue to rapidly evolve day-to-day. All construction site in the City of Beverly Hills are required to comply with all applicable and the most current emergency orders established for the COVID19 health orders. Construction sites that create unsafe conditions may be denied inspections and asked to shut down until compliance is achieved.

The latest Construction Guidelines can be found online at www.beverlyhills.org/COVID19ConstructionGuidelines.

Final

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: 94000189
Status: Final
07/29/2021
Building
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Parcel Number: Created By:

Project Number: P9400121 Applied: 01/24/1994
Project Description: HOUSE. SEE BLDG. REQUIREMENTS. Issued: 01/24/1994 Valuation: $600,000.00 Completed: 04/20/1994
Expiration: 07/23/1994 Updated By:

Owner:

Job Description: REPAIR MASONRY CHIMNEY ON REAR OF HOUSE. SEE BLDG.

REQUIREMENTS.

PROJECT INFORMATION
Square Feet (New): Dwelling Units (New): Zone: R-1.X
Square Feet (Existing): Dwelling Units (Existing): Primary Use:

Scope Category:

PEOPLE
Type Name Address Phone License

FINANCE
Group Activity Review Paid Balance
PERMIT_FEE_GROUP $75.00 $0.00 $75.00 $0.00
TOTAL $75.00 $0.00 $75.00 $0.00

TRANSACTIONS
ID Date Method Amount
673025 01/24/1994 12:00:00 AM CASH $75.00

PERMIT CONDITIONS

SIERRA CONDITIONS
Final
REPLACE BRICK VENEER ON CABLE ENG. ON SOUTH SIDE OF HOUSE. PATCH CHIMNEY AT FRONT OF HOUSE DUE TO EARTHQUAKE. PLAN ON FILE. PER CITY OF B.H. STANDARDS NOTES
COVID-19 SAFETY FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE GUIDELINES
Per the Emergency Orders issued by the State of California and the County of Los Angeles in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, construction is currently permitted to continue in the City of Beverly Hills. This may change as circumstances continue to rapidly evolve day-to-day. All construction site in the City of Beverly Hills are required to comply with all applicable and the most current emergency orders established for the COVID19 health orders. Construction sites that create unsafe conditions may be denied inspections and asked to shut down until compliance is achieved.

The latest Construction Guidelines can be found online at www.beverlyhills.org/COVID19ConstructionGuidelines.

PERMIT NO : 91000778 PROJECT NO : P9100663 TYPE : BLDG
ADDRESS : 1001 N ROXBURY DR STATUS : COMPLETE
APPL : 02/26/1991 APPR : 02/26/1991 COMP : EXP :

VALUATION : $22,000.00 P/R/E : NK
APPLICANT : STATICE LANDSCAPE
ADDRESS : 3558 OVERLAND AVE.

PHONE : 213-3201
OWNER : KOHL,MR. & MRS.

ADDITIONAL INFO : OTHER BUILDING INFO: PLAN IS ON FILE.

ZONE R-1,
USE DESCRIPTION:

ACCESSORY BUILDING.

E: PARKER S-002829 213-478-8372 91000778 BLDG
C: STATICE LANDSCAPE & DESIGN 547476 213-836-3201 91000778 BLDG PERMIT TO DO : GARDEN TRELLIS & COVERED PATIO AT TENNIS COURT Fees
Fee description Units Fee/Units Ext Fee Data
PERMIT FEE #10 $477.40
Plan Maintenance Fee $100.00
TOT.FEES : $577.40 PAYMENTS : $577.40 CREDITS : $0.00
ADJUST : $0.00 BAL DUE : $0.00
Permits
Type Number Status Issue Date Comp. Date Payments Balance Due PCBLDG C9100248 COMPLETE 02/08/1991 02/11/1991 $238.70 $0.00 PERMIT TO DO: GARDEN TRELLIS & COVERED PATIO AT TENNIS COURT Inspections
Item Description Permit Date Action Inspector
0010 Footing excavation/reinforcing 91000778 03/12/1991 RI 00330 0010 Footing excavation/reinforcing 91000778 03/13/1991 AP 00330 0010 Footing excavation/reinforcing 91000778 03/14/1991 RI 00330 0010 Footing excavation/reinforcing 91000778 03/15/1991 AP 00330

OK TO POUR FOOTINGS FOR GAZEBO
0014 Rough framing 91000778 04/05/1991 RI 00330
0014 Rough framing 91000778 04/08/1991 AP 62273
0029 Other 91000778 05/16/1991 RI 00331

TRELLIS PATIO COVER
0029 Other 91000778 05/16/1991 NA 00331
0014 Rough framing 91000778 05/24/1991 RI 00330
0014 Rough framing 91000778 05/24/1991 AP 00901
0024 Roof nailing 91000778 06/03/1991 AP 00330
0030 Final Building 91000778 10/09/1991 RI 00330
0030 Final Building 91000778 10/09/1991 NA 00330

NO PLANS OR CARD ON JOBSITE
PERMIT NO : 94000189 PROJECT NO : P9400121 TYPE : BLDG
ADDRESS : 1001 N ROXBURY DR STATUS : FINAL
APPL : 01/24/1994 APPR : 01/24/1994 COMP : 04/20/1994 EXP : 07/23/1994 VALUATION : $6,000.00 P/R/E :

APPLICANT : LEE STUCKER CONST.

ADDRESS : 18520 BURBANK BL. #211
PHONE : 818-343-2918
OWNER : KOHL,ALLEN
ADDITIONAL INFO :

C: STUCKER LEE PAUL 408676 818-343-2918 94000189 BLDG
PERMIT TO DO : REPAIR MASONRY CHIMNEY ON REAR OF HOUSE. SEE BLDG. REQUIREMENTS.

Fees
Fee description Units Fee/Units Ext Fee Data
OTHER FEE 7500 $75.00
TOT.FEES : $75.00 PAYMENTS : $75.00 CREDITS : $0.00
ADJUST : $0.00 BAL DUE : $0.00
Conditions
1). REPLACE BRICK VENEER ON CABLE ENG. ON SOUTH SIDE OF HOUSE. PATCH CHIMNEY AT FRONT OF HOUSE DUE TO EARTHQUAKE. PLAN ON FILE. PER CITY OF B.H. STANDARDS
Inspections
Item Description Permit Date Action Inspector
0010 Footing excavation/reinforcing 94000189 02/28/1994 RI 46088 0010 Footing excavation/reinforcing 94000189 02/28/1994 CO 84922

NEED PLANS
0030 Final Building 94000189 04/18/1994 RI 84922
0030 Final Building 94000189 04/18/1994 NA 84922

NO ACCESS
0030 Final Building 94000189 04/20/1994 RI 84922
0030 Final Building 94000189 04/20/1994 FI 84922

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: BS0208390
Status: Expired
07/29/2021
Building
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Parcel Number: Created By:

Project Number: 020002907 Applied: 07/26/2002
Project Description: pool Issued: 07/26/2002
Valuation: $3,500.00 Completed:

Expiration: 01/22/2003 Updated By: slewis
Owner: KOHL ALLEN D
Job Description: RE-PLASTER SWIMMING POOL

PROJECT INFORMATION
Square Feet (New): Dwelling Units (New): Zone: R-1.X
Square Feet (Existing): Dwelling Units (Existing): Primary Use:

Scope Category:

PEOPLE
Type Name Address Phone License
Applicant MONITOR POOL COMPANY P.O. BOX 55013 6612531858 Contractor MONITOR POOL COMPANY P.O. BOX 55013 6612531858 Owner KOHL ALLEN D 450 N ROXBURY DRNO 600

FINANCE
Group Activity Review Paid Balance
BUSINESS_TAX_GROUP $4.38 $0.00 $4.38 $0.00
PERMIT_FEE_GROUP $160.10 $0.00 $160.10 $0.00
TOTAL $164.48 $0.00 $164.48 $0.00

TRANSACTIONS
ID Date Method Amount
88991 07/26/2002 12:00:00 AM CHECK $4.38
88989 07/26/2002 12:00:00 AM CHECK $160.10

PERMIT CONDITIONS
To Request an Inspection: A.) Dial 310.285.2534 B.) Enter your permit number.

To Request an Inspection: A.) Dial 310.285.2534 B.) Enter your permit number. (Remember, each permit has a different number.) C.) Enter your three digit inspection request from the list below. 104. Building setback verification 105. Clarifier 106. Foundations/UFER ground 107. Block wall grout 108. Concrete wall pour 109.

Shotcrete 110. Slab pour 111. Floor joists 112. Under-floor insulation 113. Floor sheathing (nailing) 114.

Building height verification 115. Roof framing/sheathing (nailing) 116. Exterior wall framing 117. Anchor bolts 118. Hold downs 119. Shear walls 120. Rough accessibility 121. Rough framing 122. Insulation 123. Drywall nailing 124. Interior lath 125. Exterior lath 126. Exterior scratch coat 127. T-bar ceiling 128. Site drainage/landscaping 129. Final building 130. Pool pre-gunite (excavation/reinforcing) 131. Pool enclosure/door alarms (pre-plaster)
Storm water/urban runoff discharges to the public storm drainage system shall be proh Storm water/urban runoff discharges to the public storm drainage system shall be prohibited for all discharges not wholly comprised of storm water, or permitted by a valid National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. "Storm drain system" includes all roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutter, ditches, man-made channels, or storm drains. The contractor shall prevent all non-storm water discharges from the construction site (i.e. mixing and cleaning construction materials, concrete washout, disposal of paints, adhesives, solvents, and landscape products).

NOTES
OWNER DOESN'T WANT PHONE NUMBER REVEALED.

COVID-19 SAFETY FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE GUIDELINES
Per the Emergency Orders issued by the State of California and the County of Los Angeles in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, construction is currently permitted to continue in the City of Beverly Hills. This may change as circumstances continue to rapidly evolve day-to-day. All construction site in the City of Beverly Hills are required to comply with all applicable and the most current emergency orders established for the COVID19 health orders. Construction sites that create unsafe conditions may be denied inspections and asked to shut down until compliance is achieved.

The latest Construction Guidelines can be found online at www.beverlyhills.org/COVID19ConstructionGuidelines.

Final

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: BS0546324
Status: Final
07/29/2021
Building
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Parcel Number: Created By:

Project Number: 050013233 Applied: 09/13/2005
Project Description: MAIN HOUSE-INTERIOR REMODEL Issued: 09/15/2005 Valuation: $45,000.00 Completed: 11/28/2007
Expiration: 03/12/2006 Updated By: sbyrd
Owner:

Job Description: SOFT DEMO FOR MAIN RESIDENCE (NON-STRUCT).

PROJECT INFORMATION
Square Feet (New): Dwelling Units (New): Zone: R-1.X
Square Feet (Existing): Dwelling Units (Existing): Primary Use:

Scope Category:

FINANCE
Group Activity Review Paid Balance
BUSINESS_TAX_GROUP $56.25 $0.00 $56.25 $0.00
PERMIT_FEE_GROUP $1,117.00 $0.00 $1,117.00 $0.00
TOTAL $1,173.25 $0.00 $1,173.25 $0.00

TRANSACTIONS
ID Date Method Amount
163661 09/15/2005 12:00:00 AM CHECK $1,173.25
Final

PERMIT CONDITIONS
Inspection Request Codes
To Request an Inspection: A.) Dial 310.285.2534 B.) Enter your permit number. (Remember, each permit has a different number.) C.) Enter your three digit inspection request from the list below. 104. Building setback verification 105. Clarifier 106. Foundations/UFER ground 107. Block wall grout 108. Concrete wall pour 109.

Shotcrete 110. Slab pour 111. Floor joists 112. Under-floor insulation 113. Floor sheathing (nailing) 114.

REIMBURSEMENT OF PERMIT FEES
Health and Safety Code Section 17951 is amended to provide that a permittee is entitled to reimbursement of permit fees if the local enforcement agency fails to conduct an inspection of the permitted work within 60 days of receiving notice that the work is completed.

Special Inspection/Investigation Fee
SPECIAL INSPECTION/INVESTIGATION FEE: A special inspection fee may be assessed by the building official or his technical officers, inspectors, and other employees as determined necessary to achieve compliance of the permitted work and/or related activity. Such enforcement shall result from those actions and/or a violation(s) of Beverly Hills Municipal code associated with the permitted work and/or related activity caused by property owner, contractor, its employees, and/or persons working under the control and direction of contractor. A two hour minimum special inspection/investigation fee shall apply, with additional time charged at the current hourly rate. Such related building and/or technical permits shall be suspended until the assessed special investigation fee has been paid and the subject actions and/or violations(s) of Beverly Hills Municipal code have been resolved to the satisfaction of the building official.

Fire Life Safety
If Fire Life Safety Fee has been applied to this permit then prior to operation and/or use of any system or equipment, or occupancy of any temporary and/or permanent facilities, the owner/contractor must call the Fire Department to schedule inspection at (310) 281-2703.

Restrictions On Construction Activity
RESTRICTIONS ON CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY: No person shall engage in construction, maintenance or repair work which requires a City permit between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. of any day, or at any time on a Sunday or public holiday unless such person has been issued an after hours construction permit. In addition, no person shall engage in such work within a residential zone, or within five hundred (500) feet of a residential zone, at any time on a Saturday unless such person has been issued an after hours construction permit. For the purpose of this Section, "Public Holiday" shall mean: (1) New Year's Day (2) Memorial Day (3) Independence Day (4) Labor Day (5) Thanksgiving Day (6) Christmas Day. No person employed for the purposes of construction, maintenance, or repair work which requires a city permit shall enter a site on which such work will be done prior to 8:00 a.m. Any violation of this condition shall be deemed to be an infraction.

NOTES
Final
COVID-19 SAFETY FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE GUIDELINES
Per the Emergency Orders issued by the State of California and the County of Los Angeles in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, construction is currently permitted to continue in the City of Beverly Hills. This may change as circumstances continue to rapidly evolve day-to-day. All construction site in the City of Beverly Hills are required to comply with all applicable and the most current emergency orders established for the COVID19 health orders. Construction sites that create unsafe conditions may be denied inspections and asked to shut down until compliance is achieved.

The latest Construction Guidelines can be found online at www.beverlyhills.org/COVID19ConstructionGuidelines.

Final

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: BS0532498
Status: Final
07/29/2021
Building
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Parcel Number: Created By:

Project Number: 050013233 Applied: 08/03/2005
Project Description: MAIN HOUSE-INTERIOR REMODEL Issued: 10/05/2005 Valuation: $800,000.00 Completed: 11/28/2007
Expiration: 03/19/2007 Updated By: ivelasco
Owner: DAVID BOHNETT
Job Description: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE-INTERIOR REMODEL: REDUCTION OF AREA BY 213 SQ.DT., NO CHANGE IN FOOT PRINT & ADDITION OF 117 SQ FT.

PROJECT INFORMATION
Square Feet (New): Dwelling Units (New): Zone: R-1.X
Square Feet (Existing): Dwelling Units (Existing): Primary Use:

Scope Category:

PEOPLE
Type Name Address Phone License
Contractor ANDREW/INSURANCE 8118 HOLLYWOOD BLVD 3236567425 Engineer REISS BROWN EKMEKI 18980 VENTURA BLVD #350 8187571501 Owner DAVID BOHNETT 1001 N. ROXBURY DR 3102761001
Applicant LESLIE BARRETT-RCH STUDIOS 6824 MELROSE AVAENUE 3236349220

FINANCE
Group Activity Review Paid Balance
BUSINESS_TAX_GROUP $1,000.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $0.00
PERMIT_FEE_GROUP $13,172.55 $0.00 $13,172.55 $0.00
PLAN_CHECK_GROUP $4,913.25 $0.00 $4,913.25 $0.00
TOTAL $19,085.80 $0.00 $19,085.80 $0.00

TRANSACTIONS
ID Date Method Amount
Final
158576 08/03/2005 12:00:00 AM CHECK $4,913.25
165647 10/05/2005 12:00:00 AM CHECK $14,172.55

PERMIT CONDITIONS

Inspection Request Codes
To Request an Inspection: A.) Dial 310.285.2534 B.) Enter your permit number. (Remember, each permit has a different number.) C.) Enter your three digit inspection request from the list below. 104. Building setback verification 105. Clarifier 106. Foundations/UFER ground 107. Block wall grout 108. Concrete wall pour 109.

Shotcrete 110. Slab pour 111. Floor joists 112. Under-floor insulation 113. Floor sheathing (nailing) 114.

NOTES
PLANNIG DEPT.: LILY YEGAZY DATE: 9/12/05 REMARKS: * NEW WINDOW IN FRONT SIDE IS Final
THE ONLY VISIBLE * EACH SIDE YD IS > 10' THERE FOR CHANGE EXTERIOR BLDG HT MAY BE 32' * NO FLOOR AREA ADDITION * DECREASED AREA BY 330 & ADDE 117 = END RESULT IS AREA REDUCTION BY 213 SF * GUEST HOUSE (EXISTING) = 1352 BLDG SPRINKLERED:

NO PLAN ON FILE.

The latest Construction Guidelines can be found online at www.beverlyhills.org/COVID19ConstructionGuidelines.

Page 1 of 3 ends

Final

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: BS0551931
Status: Final
07/29/2021
Roofing
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Parcel Number: Created By:

Project Number: 050018094 Applied: 10/03/2005
Project Description: RE-ROOF ACCESSORY STRUCTURE. Issued: 10/03/2005 Valuation: $20,420.00 Completed: 11/28/2007
Expiration: 04/01/2006 Updated By: ivelasco
Owner: KOHL ALLEN D
Job Description:

RE-ROOF ACCESSORY STRUCTURE. - T/O WOOD SHIGLES, INSTALL 5/8" CDX

PLYWOOD, INSTALL LIGHT WEIGHT SLATE TO MANUFACTURE
SPECIFICATIONS.

PEOPLE
Type Name Address Phone License
Owner KOHL ALLEN D 450 N ROXBURY DRNO 600
Contractor FOLGER ROOFING 18435 BRYANT ST. 8187011814

FINANCE
Group Activity Review Paid Balance
BUSINESS_TAX_GROUP $25.53 $0.00 $25.53 $0.00
PERMIT_FEE_GROUP $687.40 $0.00 $687.40 $0.00
TOTAL $712.93 $0.00 $712.93 $0.00

TRANSACTIONS
ID Date Method Amount
165326 10/03/2005 12:00:00 AM CHECK $712.93

PERMIT CONDITIONS

ROOFING REQUIREMENTS
ROOFING REQUIREMENTS: 1. All roof coverings shall be CLASS "A" fire retardant, unless specifically approved by this department. 2. Roofing products NOT PRESCRIBED under UBC SEC.1504, shall be approved by this department. HOWEVER, approval from ICBO or other recognized agencies may be

Page 2 of 3 ends

Final
acceptable. A copy of an evaluation report from these agencies MUST BE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES. 3. A safe, full height ladder MUST BE ON SITE AT THE TIME OF OF INSPECTION. Failure to provide the required ladder could result in a RE-INSPECTION FEE. 4.REQUIRED INSPECTIONS DURING A RE-ROOFING PROJECT ARE AS FOLLOWS: * Call for inspection when the deck is exposed and before any roofing materials are installed. * Call for nailing inspection if new sheathing is being installed. DISCHARGES INTO STORM DRAIN SYSTEM: Storm water/urban runoff discharges to the public storm drainage system shall be prohibited for all discharges not wholly comprised of storm water, or permitted by a valid National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. "Storm drain system" includes all roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutter, ditches, man-made channels, or storm drains. The contractor shall prevent all non-storm water discharges from the construction site (i.e. mixing and cleaning construction materials, concrete washout, disposal of paints, adhesives, solvents, and landscape products).

INSPECTION REQUEST CODES
TO REQUEST AND INSPECTION: A.) Dial 310.285.2534 B.) Enter your permit number. (Remember, each permit has a different number.) C.) Enter your three digit inspection request from the list below. 150. Roof deck (existing) 151. Roof sheathing (nailing) 152. Fire-retardant shakes/shingles-underlayment Class "A" (wood roofs) 153. Final roof

NOTES
RE-ROOF TEAR OFF NEW SHEATHING PROPOSED ROOF TYPE; LIGHT WEIGHT SLATE MANUFACTURE NAME: AMERICAN SLATE APPROVAL No. 1504.2 BUILDING CODE MATERIAL WEIGHT: 5 LBS/SQ FT CLASS A ROOF COVERING TOTAL No. OF SQUARES; 10 COVID-19 SAFETY FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE GUIDELINES
Per the Emergency Orders issued by the State of California and the County of Los Angeles in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, construction is currently permitted to continue in the City of Beverly Hills. This may change as circumstances continue to rapidly evolve day-to-day. All

Page 3 of 3 ends

Final
construction site in the City of Beverly Hills are required to comply with all applicable and the most current emergency orders established for the COVID19 health orders. Construction sites that create unsafe conditions may be denied inspections and asked to shut down until compliance is achieved.

The latest Construction Guidelines can be found online at www.beverlyhills.org/COVID19ConstructionGuidelines.

Page 1 of 3 ends

Final

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: BS0551923
Status: Final
07/29/2021
Roofing
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Parcel Number: Created By:

Project Number: 050018090 Applied: 10/03/2005
Project Description: RE-ROOF MAIN HOUSE. Issued: 10/03/2005 Valuation: $184,000.00 Completed: 11/28/2007
Expiration: 04/01/2006 Updated By: ivelasco
Owner: KOHL ALLEN D
Job Description: RE-ROOF MAIN HOUSE. T/O WOOD SHINGLES, INSTALL 5/8" CDX PLYWOOD, INSTALL LIGHT WEIGHT SLATE.

PEOPLE
Type Name Address Phone License
Owner KOHL ALLEN D 450 N ROXBURY DRNO 600
Contractor FOLGER ROOFING 18435 BRYANT ST. 8187011814

FINANCE
Group Activity Review Paid Balance
BUSINESS_TAX_GROUP $230.00 $0.00 $230.00 $0.00
PERMIT_FEE_GROUP $2,882.90 $0.00 $2,882.90 $0.00
TOTAL $3,112.90 $0.00 $3,112.90 $0.00

TRANSACTIONS
ID Date Method Amount
165324 10/03/2005 12:00:00 AM CHECK $3,112.90

PERMIT CONDITIONS

Page 2 of 3 ends

Final
ALL TIMES. 3. A safe, full height ladder MUST BE ON SITE AT THE TIME OF OF INSPECTION. Failure to provide the required ladder could result in a RE-INSPECTION FEE. 4.REQUIRED INSPECTIONS DURING A RE-ROOFING PROJECT ARE AS FOLLOWS: * Call for inspection when the deck is exposed and before any roofing materials are installed. * Call for nailing inspection if new sheathing is being installed. DISCHARGES INTO STORM DRAIN SYSTEM: Storm water/urban runoff discharges to the public storm drainage system shall be prohibited for all discharges not wholly comprised of storm water, or permitted by a valid National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. "Storm drain system" includes all roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutter, ditches, man-made channels, or storm drains. The contractor shall prevent all non-storm water discharges from the construction site (i.e. mixing and cleaning construction materials, concrete washout, disposal of paints, adhesives, solvents, and landscape products).

NOTES
COVID-19 SAFETY FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE GUIDELINES
Per the Emergency Orders issued by the State of California and the County of Los Angeles in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, construction is currently permitted to continue in the City of Beverly Hills. This may change as circumstances continue to rapidly evolve day-to-day. All construction site in the City of Beverly Hills are required to comply with all applicable and the most current emergency orders established for the COVID19 health orders. Construction sites that create unsafe conditions may be denied inspections and asked to shut down until compliance is achieved.

The latest Construction Guidelines can be found online at

Page 3 of 3 ends

Final
www.beverlyhills.org/COVID19ConstructionGuidelines.

Final

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: BS0603384
Status: Final
07/29/2021
Building
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Parcel Number: Created By:

Project Number: 050013233 Applied: 01/24/2006
Project Description: MAIN HOUSE-INTERIOR REMODEL Issued: 01/24/2006 Valuation: $20,000.00 Completed: 11/14/2007
Expiration: 07/23/2006 Updated By: lmehrabi
Owner: BOHNETT DAVID
Job Description: CONSTRUCT 4 CHIMNEYS

PROJECT INFORMATION
Square Feet (New): Dwelling Units (New): Zone: R-1.X
Square Feet (Existing): Dwelling Units (Existing): Primary Use:

Scope Category:

PEOPLE
Type Name Address Phone License
Contractor ANDREW/INSURANCE 8118 HOLLYWOOD BLVD 3236567425 Architect RIOS CLEMENTI HALE STUDIOS 639 N. LARCHMONT BLVD. SUITE 100 3237851830
Owner BOHNETT DAVID 245 S BEVERLY 3102760005
Applicant LESLIE BARRETT-RCH STUDIOS 6824 MELROSE AVAENUE 3236349220

FINANCE
Group Activity Review Paid Balance
BUSINESS_TAX_GROUP $25.00 $0.00 $25.00 $0.00
PERMIT_FEE_GROUP $819.52 $0.00 $819.52 $0.00
PLAN_CHECK_GROUP $483.08 $0.00 $483.08 $0.00
TOTAL $1,327.60 $0.00 $1,327.60 $0.00

TRANSACTIONS
ID Date Method Amount
Final
172385 01/24/2006 12:00:00 AM CHECK $1,327.60
172443 01/24/2006 12:00:00 AM CORRECTION ($1,327.60)
172446 01/25/2006 12:00:00 AM CHECK $1,327.60

PERMIT CONDITIONS

REMARKS
USE: S.F.R OCC GROUP: R3 CONST. TYPE: VN STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: OF CHIMNEY 33'-9" AC CASE No.

PL0532086 REF. BS0532498 BLDG SPRINKLERED: NO PLAN ON FILE.

Shotcrete 110. Slab pour 111. Floor joists 112. Under-floor insulation 113. Floor sheathing (nailing) 114.

Final
NOTES
COVID-19 SAFETY FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE GUIDELINES
Per the Emergency Orders issued by the State of California and the County of Los Angeles in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, construction is currently permitted to continue in the City of Beverly Hills. This may change as circumstances continue to rapidly evolve day-to-day. All construction site in the City of Beverly Hills are required to comply with all applicable and the most current emergency orders established for the COVID19 health orders. Construction sites that create unsafe conditions may be denied inspections and asked to shut down until compliance is achieved.

The latest Construction Guidelines can be found online at www.beverlyhills.org/COVID19ConstructionGuidelines.

Final

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: BS0602328
Status: Final
07/29/2021
Building
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Parcel Number: Created By:

Project Number: 050013233 Applied: 01/18/2006
Project Description: MAIN HOUSE-INTERIOR REMODEL Issued: 01/18/2006 Valuation: $7,000.00 Completed: 11/28/2007
Expiration: 07/17/2006 Updated By: lmehrabi
Owner: BOHNETT DAVID
Job Description: ADD CALIFORNIA FRAMED ROOF OVER NEW ENTRY PORTICO AND ADD 40 SF. TO 1ST. FLR. BREAKFAST ROOM.

PROJECT INFORMATION
Square Feet (New): Dwelling Units (New): Zone: R-1.X
Square Feet (Existing): Dwelling Units (Existing): Primary Use:

Scope Category:

PEOPLE
Type Name Address Phone License
Contractor ANDREW/INSURANCE 8118 HOLLYWOOD BLVD 3236567425 Architect RIOS CLEMENTI HALE STUDIOS 639 N. LARCHMONT BLVD. SUITE 100 3237851830
Owner BOHNETT DAVID 245 S BEVERLY 3102760005
Engineer RICHARD BROWN 18980 VENTURA BLVD. 8117571501

FINANCE
Group Activity Review Paid Balance
BUSINESS_TAX_GROUP $8.75 $0.00 $8.75 $0.00
PERMIT_FEE_GROUP $577.16 $0.00 $577.16 $0.00
PLAN_CHECK_GROUP $194.09 $0.00 $194.09 $0.00
TOTAL $780.00 $0.00 $780.00 $0.00

TRANSACTIONS
Final
ID Date Method Amount
172045 01/18/2006 12:00:00 AM CHECK $780.00

PERMIT CONDITIONS
REMARKS:

USE: SFR OCC. GROUP: R3 CONST. TYPE: VN STORIES = 2+B FLOOR AREA ADDED = 40 SF.

ADDITIONS ARE EXEMPT FROM DESIGN REVIEW. ON ORIGINAL PERMIT #BS0532498 REDUCES BLDG. AREA BY 213 SF. THEREFOR PROPOSED 40SF. ADDITION IS STILL UNDER ORIGINAL AREA.

PLANNING DEPT. BY LILY YEGAZU ON 1/18/06.

Shotcrete 110. Slab pour 111. Floor joists 112. Under-floor insulation 113. Floor sheathing (nailing) 114.

Restrictions On Construction Activity
RESTRICTIONS ON CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY: No person shall engage in construction, maintenance or repair work which requires a City permit between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. of any day, or at any time on a Sunday or public holiday unless such person has been issued an after hours construction permit. In addition, no person shall engage in such work within a residential zone, or within five hundred (500) feet of a residential zone, at any time on a Saturday unless such person has been issued an after hours construction permit. For the purpose of this Section, "Public Holiday" shall mean: (1) New Year's Day (2) Memorial Day (3) Independence Day (4) Labor Day (5) Thanksgiving Day (6) Christmas Day. No person employed for the purposes of construction, maintenance, or repair work which requires a city permit shall enter a site on which Final
such work will be done prior to 8:00 a.m. Any violation of this condition shall be deemed to be an infraction.

The latest Construction Guidelines can be found online at www.beverlyhills.org/COVID19ConstructionGuidelines.

Final

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: BS0621470
Status: Final
05/26/2021
Building
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Parcel Number: Created By:

Project Number: 050013233 Applied: 05/23/2006
Project Description: MAIN HOUSE-INTERIOR REMODEL Issued: 06/27/2006 Valuation: $45,000.00 Completed: 11/14/2007
Expiration: 11/19/2006 Updated By: ivelasco
Owner: BOHNETT DAVID
Job Description: REINFORCE EXISTING ROOF AND EXTERIOR WALLS (91' ON 2ND FLR AND 138' ON 1ST FLR), ADD 2 WINDOWS AND NEW STRUCTURAL SLAB.

PROJECT INFORMATION
Square Feet (New): Dwelling Units (New): Zone: R-1.X
Square Feet (Existing): Dwelling Units (Existing): Primary Use:

Scope Category:

PEOPLE
Type Name Address Phone License
Contractor ANDREW/INSURANCE 8118 HOLLYWOOD BLVD 3236567425 Architect RIOS CLEMENTI HALE STUDIOS 639 N. LARCHMONT BLVD. SUITE 100 3237851830
Engineer REISS BROWN EKMEKI 18980 VENTURA BLVD #350 8187571501 Owner BOHNETT DAVID 245 S BEVERLY 3102760005
Applicant LESLIE BARRETT-RCH STUDIOS 6824 MELROSE AVAENUE 3236349220

FINANCE
Group Activity Review Paid Balance
BUSINESS_TAX_GROUP $56.25 $0.00 $56.25 $0.00
PERMIT_FEE_GROUP $1,364.77 $0.00 $1,364.77 $0.00
PLAN_CHECK_GROUP $806.46 $0.00 $806.46 $0.00
TOTAL $2,227.48 $0.00 $2,227.48 $0.00

TRANSACTIONS
Final
ID Date Method Amount
179158 05/23/2006 12:00:00 AM REVERSE ($612.43)
179153 05/23/2006 12:00:00 AM CREDIT CARD $612.43
179427 05/30/2006 12:00:00 AM CHECK $612.43
181052 06/27/2006 12:00:00 AM CHECK $1,615.05

PERMIT CONDITIONS
REMARKS:

USE: S.F.R. OCC GROUP: R3 CONST. TYPE: VN STORIES: 2 ROOFING: SLATE (CLASS I) ZONING:

CENTRAL R1 SITE INFORMATION REMAINDS AS IS NO CHANGE. AC CASE No. PL0532086 BLDG SPRINKLERED: YES PLAN ON FILE.

Shotcrete 110. Slab pour 111. Floor joists 112. Under-floor insulation 113. Floor sheathing (nailing) 114.

Special Inspection/Investigation Fee
SPECIAL INSPECTION/INVESTIGATION FEE: A special inspection fee may be assessed by the building official or his technical officers, inspectors, and other employees as determined necessary to achieve compliance of the permitted work and/or related activity. Such enforcement shall result from those actions and/or a violation(s) of Beverly Hills Municipal code associated with the permitted work and/or related activity caused by property owner, contractor, its employees, and/or persons working under the control and direction of contractor. A two hour minimum special inspection/investigation fee shall apply, with additional time charged at Final
the current hourly rate. Such related building and/or technical permits shall be suspended until the assessed special investigation fee has been paid and the subject actions and/or violations(s) of Beverly Hills Municipal code have been resolved to the satisfaction of the building official.

The latest Construction Guidelines can be found online at www.beverlyhills.org/COVID19ConstructionGuidelines.

Page 1 of 2 ends

Final

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: BS0561448
Status: Final
07/29/2021
Fence / Wall
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Parcel Number: Created By:

Project Number: 050018258 Applied: 11/21/2005
Project Description: SITE PROJECT. Issued: 11/21/2005
Valuation: $1,000.00 Completed: 11/28/2007
Expiration: 05/20/2006 Updated By: ivelasco
Owner: DAVID BOHNETT
Job Description: NEW BLOCK WALL +/- 5' HIGH, 25 LINEAR FT TO ENCLOSE PATIO.

PEOPLE
Type Name Address Phone License
Contractor ANDREW/INSURANCE 8118 HOLLYWOOD BLVD 3236567425 Owner DAVID BOHNETT 1001 N. ROXBURY DR 3102761001
Applicant ERIC MANN 1001 N. ROXBURY DR 3102768112

FINANCE
Group Activity Review Paid Balance
BUSINESS_TAX_GROUP $1.25 $0.00 $1.25 $0.00
PERMIT_FEE_GROUP $114.60 $0.00 $114.60 $0.00
PLAN_CHECK_GROUP $60.71 $0.00 $60.71 $0.00
TOTAL $176.56 $0.00 $176.56 $0.00

TRANSACTIONS
ID Date Method Amount
169138 11/21/2005 12:00:00 AM CHECK $176.56

PERMIT CONDITIONS

REMARKS
PLANS FILED WITH BS0532498
Inspection Request Codes
TO REQUEST AN INSPECTION: A.) Dial 310.285.2534 B.) Enter your permit number. (Remember, each

Page 2 of 2 ends

Final
permit has a different number.) C.) Enter your three digit inspection request from the list below. 180. Fence/wall setback verification 181. Foundation(s) 182. Block wall grout 183. Concrete wall pour 184. Sub-surface drainage 185. Fence/wall height verification 186. Final grading 187. Final fence/wall

The latest Construction Guidelines can be found online at www.beverlyhills.org/COVID19ConstructionGuidelines.

Page 1 of 2 ends

Final

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: BS0552664
Status: Final
07/29/2021
Fence / Wall
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Parcel Number: Created By:

Project Number: 050018258 Applied: 10/05/2005
Project Description: SITE PROJECT. Issued: 10/05/2005
Valuation: $3,500.00 Completed: 11/28/2007
Expiration: 04/03/2006 Updated By: ivelasco
Owner: DAVID BOHNETT
Job Description: DEMO OF PRIVACY WALL IN SIDEYARD.

PEOPLE
Type Name Address Phone License
Contractor ANDREW/INSURANCE 8118 HOLLYWOOD BLVD 3236567425 Owner DAVID BOHNETT 1001 N. ROXBURY DR 3102761001

FINANCE
Group Activity Review Paid Balance
BUSINESS_TAX_GROUP $4.38 $0.00 $4.38 $0.00
PERMIT_FEE_GROUP $176.70 $0.00 $176.70 $0.00
TOTAL $181.08 $0.00 $181.08 $0.00

TRANSACTIONS
ID Date Method Amount
165648 10/05/2005 12:00:00 AM CHECK $181.08

PERMIT CONDITIONS
Inspection Request Codes
TO REQUEST AN INSPECTION: A.) Dial 310.285.2534 B.) Enter your permit number. (Remember, each permit has a different number.) C.) Enter your three digit inspection request from the list below. 180. Fence/wall setback verification 181. Foundation(s) 182. Block wall grout 183. Concrete wall pour 184. Sub-surface drainage 185. Fence/wall height verification 186. Final grading 187. Final fence/wall

REIMBURSEMENT OF PERMIT FEES

Page 2 of 2 ends

Final
Health and Safety Code Section 17951 is amended to provide that a permittee is entitled to reimbursement of permit fees if the local enforcement agency fails to conduct an inspection of the permitted work within 60 days of receiving notice that the work is completed.

The latest Construction Guidelines can be found online at www.beverlyhills.org/COVID19ConstructionGuidelines.

Final

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: BS0621470
Status: Final
05/26/2021
Building
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Parcel Number: Created By:

PROJECT INFORMATION
Square Feet (New): Dwelling Units (New): Zone: R-1.X
Square Feet (Existing): Dwelling Units (Existing): Primary Use:

Scope Category:

PEOPLE
Type Name Address Phone License
Contractor ANDREW/INSURANCE 8118 HOLLYWOOD BLVD 3236567425 Architect RIOS CLEMENTI HALE STUDIOS 639 N. LARCHMONT BLVD. SUITE 100 3237851830
Engineer REISS BROWN EKMEKI 18980 VENTURA BLVD #350 8187571501 Owner BOHNETT DAVID 245 S BEVERLY 3102760005
Applicant LESLIE BARRETT-RCH STUDIOS 6824 MELROSE AVAENUE 3236349220

PERMIT CONDITIONS
REMARKS:

USE: S.F.R. OCC GROUP: R3 CONST. TYPE: VN STORIES: 2 ROOFING: SLATE (CLASS I) ZONING:

CENTRAL R1 SITE INFORMATION REMAINDS AS IS NO CHANGE. AC CASE No. PL0532086 BLDG SPRINKLERED: YES PLAN ON FILE.

Shotcrete 110. Slab pour 111. Floor joists 112. Under-floor insulation 113. Floor sheathing (nailing) 114.

Special Inspection/Investigation Fee
SPECIAL INSPECTION/INVESTIGATION FEE: A special inspection fee may be assessed by the building official or his technical officers, inspectors, and other employees as determined necessary to achieve compliance of the permitted work and/or related activity. Such enforcement shall result from those actions and/or a violation(s) of Beverly Hills Municipal code associated with the permitted work and/or related activity caused by property owner, contractor, its employees, and/or persons working under the control and direction of contractor. A two hour minimum special inspection/investigation fee shall apply, with additional time charged at Final
the current hourly rate. Such related building and/or technical permits shall be suspended until the assessed special investigation fee has been paid and the subject actions and/or violations(s) of Beverly Hills Municipal code have been resolved to the satisfaction of the building official.

The latest Construction Guidelines can be found online at www.beverlyhills.org/COVID19ConstructionGuidelines.

Page 1 of 2 ends

Final

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: BS0563217
Status: Final
07/29/2021
Asbestos Abatement
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Parcel Number: Created By:

Project Number: 050013233 Applied: 12/06/2005
Project Description: MAIN HOUSE-INTERIOR REMODEL Issued: 12/06/2005 Valuation: $1,500.00 Completed: 11/28/2007
Expiration: 06/04/2006 Updated By: sbyrd
Owner: BOHNETT GREGOR
Job Description: REMOVAL OF TRANSITE & DUCTS IN PIPE CHASE.

PEOPLE
Type Name Address Phone License
Contractor KEY ENVIRONMENTAL -- Kelly
Simpson 1450 S. BURLINGTON AVE. #A
Owner BOHNETT GREGOR 1001 N ROXBURY DRIVE 3102768112

FINANCE
Group Activity Review Paid Balance
BUSINESS_TAX_GROUP $1.88 $0.00 $1.88 $0.00
PERMIT_FEE_GROUP $127.60 $0.00 $127.60 $0.00
TOTAL $129.48 $0.00 $129.48 $0.00

TRANSACTIONS
ID Date Method Amount
170003 12/06/2005 12:00:00 AM CREDIT CARD $129.48

PERMIT CONDITIONS
Asbestos Abatement Inspection Request Codes
TO REQUEST AN INSPECTION: A.) Dial 310.285.2534 B.) Enter your permit number. (Remember, each permit has a different number.) C.) Enter your three digit inspection request from the list below. 161. Final asbestos abatement
Special Inspection/Investigation Fee

Page 2 of 2 ends

Final
SPECIAL INSPECTION/INVESTIGATION FEE: A special inspection fee may be assessed by the building official or his technical officers, inspectors, and other employees as determined necessary to achieve compliance of the permitted work and/or related activity. Such enforcement shall result from those actions and/or a violation(s) of Beverly Hills Municipal code associated with the permitted work and/or related activity caused by property owner, contractor, its employees, and/or persons working under the control and direction of contractor. A two hour minimum special inspection/investigation fee shall apply, with additional time charged at the current hourly rate. Such related building and/or technical permits shall be suspended until the assessed special investigation fee has been paid and the subject actions and/or violations(s) of Beverly Hills Municipal code have been resolved to the satisfaction of the building official.

The latest Construction Guidelines can be found online at www.beverlyhills.org/COVID19ConstructionGuidelines.

Page 1 of 3 ends

Final

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: BS0551937
Status: Final
07/29/2021
Roofing
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Parcel Number: Created By:

Project Number: 050018096 Applied: 10/03/2005
Project Description: RE-ROOF TENNIS BUILDING. Issued: 10/03/2005 Valuation: $24,620.00 Completed: 11/28/2007
Expiration: 04/01/2006 Updated By: ivelasco
Owner: KOHL ALLEN D
Job Description:

RE-ROOF TENNIS BUILDING. - T/O WOOD SHINGLES, INSTALL 5/8" CDX

PLYWOOD, INSTALL LIGHT WEIGHT SLATE TO MANUFACTURE
SPECIFICATIONS.

PEOPLE
Type Name Address Phone License
Owner KOHL ALLEN D 450 N ROXBURY DRNO 600
Contractor FOLGER ROOFING 18435 BRYANT ST. 8187011814

FINANCE
Group Activity Review Paid Balance
BUSINESS_TAX_GROUP $30.78 $0.00 $30.78 $0.00
PERMIT_FEE_GROUP $759.00 $0.00 $759.00 $0.00
TOTAL $789.78 $0.00 $789.78 $0.00

TRANSACTIONS
ID Date Method Amount
165330 10/03/2005 12:00:00 AM CHECK $789.78

PERMIT CONDITIONS

Page 2 of 3 ends

NOTES
RE-ROOF TEAR OFF NEW SHEATHING PROPOSED ROOF TYPE: LIGHT WEIGHT SLATE APPROVAL No. 1504.2 BUILDING CODE MATERIAL WEIGHT: 5 LBS/SQ FT CLASS A ROOF COVERING TOTAL NO. OF SQUARES; 20
COVID-19 SAFETY FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE GUIDELINES
Per the Emergency Orders issued by the State of California and the County of Los Angeles in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, construction is currently permitted to continue in the City of Beverly Hills. This may change as circumstances continue to rapidly evolve day-to-day. All

Page 3 of 3 ends

The latest Construction Guidelines can be found online at www.beverlyhills.org/COVID19ConstructionGuidelines.

Final

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: BS0644152
Status: Final
07/29/2021
Building
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Parcel Number: Created By:

Project Number: 050013233 Applied: 09/08/2006
Project Description: MAIN HOUSE-INTERIOR REMODEL Issued: 09/21/2006 Valuation: $2,000.00 Completed: 11/14/2007
Expiration: 03/07/2007 Updated By: ivelasco
Owner: BOHNETT DAVID
Job Description: NEW IRON BALCONY ON (E) SECOND FLOOR.

PROJECT INFORMATION
Square Feet (New): Dwelling Units (New): Zone: R-1.X
Square Feet (Existing): Dwelling Units (Existing): Primary Use:

Scope Category:

PEOPLE
Type Name Address Phone License
Contractor ANDREW/INSURANCE 8118 HOLLYWOOD BLVD 3236567425 Architect RIOS CLEMENTI HALE STUDIOS 639 N. LARCHMONT BLVD. SUITE 100 3237851830
Engineer REISS BROWN EKMEKI 18980 VENTURA BLVD #350 8187571501 Owner BOHNETT DAVID 245 S BEVERLY 3102760005
Applicant LESLIE BARRETT-RCH STUDIOS 6824 MELROSE AVAENUE 3236349220

FINANCE
Group Activity Review Paid Balance
BUSINESS_TAX_GROUP $2.50 $0.00 $2.50 $0.00
PERMIT_FEE_GROUP $158.60 $0.00 $158.60 $0.00
PLAN_CHECK_GROUP $86.58 $0.00 $86.58 $0.00
TOTAL $247.68 $0.00 $247.68 $0.00

TRANSACTIONS
Final
ID Date Method Amount
188710 09/14/2006 12:00:00 AM CHECK $132.99
189374 09/21/2006 12:00:00 AM PC CREDIT $46.41
189375 09/21/2006 12:00:00 AM CREDIT CARD $114.69

Shotcrete 110. Slab pour 111. Floor joists 112. Under-floor insulation 113. Floor sheathing (nailing) 114.

The latest Construction Guidelines can be found online at www.beverlyhills.org/COVID19ConstructionGuidelines.

Page 1 of 2 ends

Final

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: BS0647367
Status: Final
07/29/2021
Fence / Wall
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Parcel Number: Created By:

Project Number: 050018258 Applied: 09/21/2006
Project Description: SITE PROJECT. Issued: 09/21/2006
Valuation: $2,000.00 Completed: 11/28/2007
Expiration: 03/20/2007 Updated By: ivelasco
Owner: DAVID BOHNETT
Job Description: NEW PEDESTRIAN GATE IN EXISTING BRICK WALL IN SIDE YARD.

PEOPLE
Type Name Address Phone License
Contractor ANDREW/INSURANCE 8118 HOLLYWOOD BLVD 3236567425 Architect RIOS CLEMENTI HALE STUDIOS 639 N. LARCHMONT BLVD. SUITE 100 3237851830
Engineer REISS BROWN EKMEKI 18980 VENTURA BLVD #350 8187571501 Owner DAVID BOHNETT 1001 N. ROXBURY DR 3102761001
Applicant Rita 6824 MELROSE AVE. 3236349220

TRANSACTIONS
ID Date Method Amount
189377 09/21/2006 12:00:00 AM CREDIT CARD $247.68

PERMIT CONDITIONS
Inspection Request Codes

Page 2 of 2 ends

Final
TO REQUEST AN INSPECTION: A.) Dial 310.285.2534 B.) Enter your permit number. (Remember, each permit has a different number.) C.) Enter your three digit inspection request from the list below. 180. Fence/wall setback verification 181. Foundation(s) 182. Block wall grout 183. Concrete wall pour 184. Sub-surface drainage 185. Fence/wall height verification 186. Final grading 187. Final fence/wall

The latest Construction Guidelines can be found online at www.beverlyhills.org/COVID19ConstructionGuidelines.

Final

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: BS1109011
Status: Final
05/26/2021
Building
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Parcel Number: Created By:

Project Number: 110002101 Applied: 06/10/2011
Project Description: INTERIOR REMODEL Issued: 06/16/2011 Valuation: $100,000.00 Completed: 09/01/2011
Expiration: 12/07/2011 Updated By: sbyrd
Owner: LISA & JOSHUA GREER
Job Description: MINOR INTERIOR REMODEL OF ENTIRE 2 STORY SFR.

PROJECT INFORMATION
Square Feet (New): Dwelling Units (New): Zone: R-1.X
Square Feet (Existing): Dwelling Units (Existing): Primary Use:

Scope Category:

PEOPLE
Type Name Address Phone License
Contractor ANDREW/INSURANCE 8118 HOLLYWOOD BLVD 3236567425 Engineer KENNETH E. NIVER 10845 LINDBROOK DR 3104438677 Contractor John Dunagan 8118 Holly Wood Blvd. 3106297332 Architect MARK RIOS 639 S. LARCHMONT BLVD, SUITE 100 3237851800 Applicant Huay Wee 639 S. LARCHMONT BLVD, SUITE 100 3237851800 Owner LISA & JOSHUA GREER 1001 N,. ROXBURY DR 3102784412

FINANCE
Group Activity Review Paid Balance
BUSINESS_TAX_GROUP $212.50 $0.00 $212.50 $0.00
PERMIT_FEE_GROUP $3,477.03 $0.00 $3,477.03 $0.00
PLAN_CHECK_GROUP $2,229.44 $0.00 $2,229.44 $0.00
TOTAL $5,918.97 $0.00 $5,918.97 $0.00

TRANSACTIONS
ID Date Method Amount
Final
301135 06/10/2011 12:00:00 AM CREDIT CARD $2,229.44
301499 06/16/2011 12:00:00 AM CHECK $3,689.53

PERMIT CONDITIONS

REMARKS
FIRE SPRINKLER: YES
Inspection Request Codes
TO REQUEST A BUILDING & SAFETY INSPECTION: A.) Dial (310) 285-2534 B.) Enter your permit number. (Remember, each permit has a different number.) C.) Enter your three digit inspection request from the list below. 104. Building setback verification 105. Clarifier 106. Foundations/UFER ground 107. Block wall grout 108. Concrete wall pour 109. Shotcrete 110. Slab pour 111. Floor joists 112. Under-floor insulation 113. Floor sheathing (nailing) 114. Building height verification 115. Roof framing/sheathing (nailing) 116. Exterior wall framing 117. Anchor bolts 118. Hold downs 119. Shear walls 120. Rough accessibility 121. Rough framing 122.

Insulation 123. Drywall nailing 124. Interior lath 125. Exterior lath 126. Exterior scratch coat 127. T-bar ceiling 128. Site drainage/landscaping 129. Final building 130. Pool pre-gunite (excavation/reinforcing) 131. Pool enclosure/door alarms (pre-plaster)

DISCHARGES INTO STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
Storm water/urban runoff discharges to the public storm drainage system shall be prohibited for all discharges not wholly comprised of storm water, or permitted by a valid National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. "Storm drain system" includes all roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutter, ditches, man-made channels, or storm drains. The contractor shall prevent all non-storm water discharges from the construction site (i.e. mixing and cleaning construction materials, concrete washout, disposal of paints, adhesives, solvents, and landscape products). Pursuant to NPDES Section G, the City of Beverly Hills possesses the necessary legal authority to prohibit non-storm water discharges to the storm drain system, including, but not limited to, the discharge of chlorinated/brominated swimming pool water and filter backwash to the storm drain conveyance system (MS4 system). As such, before any water discharge occurs, an inspection appointment must be made with City Environmental Program Inspectors to verify acceptable chlorine/bromine concentration. Please call the City of Beverly Hills Environmental Inspectors Duane Washington at (310) 721-9726 or Michael A. Jones at (310) 779- 0574 to arrange an inspection.

Fire Life Safety
When Fire Life Safety Fee have been applied to this permit OR modifications to the Fire Life Safety System have occurred, then prior to operation and/or use of any system or equipment, or occupancy of any temporary and/or permanent facilities, the owner/contractor must call the Fire Department to schedule inspection at (310) 281-2703.

Restrictions On Construction Activity
RESTRICTIONS ON CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY: No person shall engage in construction, maintenance or repair work which requires a City permit between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. of any day, or at any time on a Sunday or public holiday unless such person has been issued an after hours construction permit. In addition, no person shall engage in such work within a residential zone, or within five hundred (500) feet of a Final
residential zone, at any time on a Saturday unless such person has been issued an after hours construction permit. For the purpose of this Section, "Public Holiday" shall mean: (1) New Year's Day (2) Memorial Day (3) Independence Day (4) Labor Day (5) Thanksgiving Day (6) Christmas Day. No person employed for the purposes of construction, maintenance, or repair work which requires a city permit shall enter a site on which such work will be done prior to 8:00 a.m. Any violation of this condition shall be deemed to be an infraction.

Seismic Inspection and Documentation Requirements
Seismic retrofit inspection and verification requirements of residential structures shall be performed by qualified persons specializing in seismic retrofit installations. Contractor shall be responsible to obtain the services of a qualified and certified Deputy Inspector, registered with the City of Beverly Hills, or State licensed Architect or Engineer, who shall verify and certify the seismic retrofit installation, was installed per the approved plan and specifications as required by a listed materials manufacturer. Contractor shall be responsible for having the work inspected and verified by such qualified, certified and/or licensed persons having specific knowledge and experience in seismic retrofit construction activity and provide a written report on appropriate letterhead stating that the work was inspected and verified to have been installed per the approved plans and all material manufacturer installation specifications. Contractor shall be responsible to schedule an inspection for the work performed and shall provide the City Building Inspector with a written report, with no unverified deficient conditions. The City Building Inspector upon his discretion may verify any statement(s) contained in the report, and/or may perform further verification and inspections as deemed necessary.

City Inspector Requirements and Conditions for Inspection City Inspector Requirements and Conditions for Inspection: 1. Provide access to work area, gates and doors to be unlocked, and pets to be out of areas of Inspection. 2. OSHA approved ladder in good condition properly secured in place to allow roof access. 3. Approved plans to be on site and available for use by City Inspector. 4.

OHSA safety practice does not allow City Inspectors on roofs in rainy conditions. Inspections scheduled during poor weather are subject to cancelation . Contractors are responsible for rescheduling the Inspection.

Ord. 90-O-2088, eff. 2-8-1990)

STREETS DESIGNATED FOR HEAVY VEHICLE USAGE
Pursuant to Beverly Hills Municipal Code º 7-2-203, the following streets are designated for use by vehicles exceeding a maximum gross weight, including the vehicle and its load, of three (3) tons: Alden Drive; Bedford Drive from Wilshire Boulevard to Santa Monica Boulevard (north); Beverly Boulevard; Beverly Drive from the south city limits to Santa Monica Boulevard (north); Brighton Way from Canon Drive to Wilshire Boulevard; Burton Way; Camden Drive from Wilshire Boulevard to Santa Monica Boulevard (north); Canon Drive from Wilshire Boulevard to Santa Monica Boulevard (north); Civic Center Drive from Burton Way to Santa Monica Boulevard (south); Crescent Drive between the north and south roadways of Santa Monica Boulevard; Dayton Way from Canon Drive to Wilshire Boulevard; Doheny Drive; Foothill Road from Burton Way to Santa Monica Boulevard (south); La Cienega Boulevard; Linden Drive from Wilshire Boulevard to Santa MonicaBoulevard (south); Maple Drive from Burton Way to Santa Monica Boulevard (south); Olympic Boulevard; Rexford Drive from Santa Monica Boulevard (north) to Burton Way; Robertson Boulevard; Rodeo Drive from Wilshire Boulevard to Santa Monica Boulevard (north); Roxbury Drive from Wilshire Boulevard to Santa Monica Boulevard (north); San Vicente Boulevard; Santa Monica Boulevard (north and south roadways); Third Street; Wilshire Boulevard
BHMC 7-2-205: COMMERCIAL VEHICLES PROHIBITED FROM USING PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS WITHOUT Final

PERMISSION
No person shall operate or drive a commercial vehicle in, on, or across any private driveway approach or sidewalk area without the consent of the owner or occupant of such property if a sign or markings are in place indicating that the use of such driveway is prohibited. For the purposes of this section, a commercial vehicle shall mean a vehicle having a rated capacity in excess of one-half (1/2) ton. (1962 Code º 3-6.803)

OVERSIZE HAULING
Hauling that meets the following criteria may require engineering investigations, routing definition, coordination, police escort, and control of permit movement: (1) Loads in excess of 14 feet wide. (2) Loads in excess of 135 feet in overall length. (3) Loads that are of a weight that require: A) More than a 13-axle, single-vehicle width hauling combination, or B) A 13-axle, single-vehicle width hauling combination with a load deck where the inner axles in the groups bordering the load deck are 40 feet or more apart, or C) Two or more side-by-side vehicles with a combined width of 14 feet or more supporting the load.

The latest Construction Guidelines can be found online at www.beverlyhills.org/COVID19ConstructionGuidelines.

Final

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: BS1502719
Status: Final
07/29/2021
Building
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Parcel Number: Created By:

Project Number: 120003995 Applied: 02/20/2015
Project Description: NEW EMERGENCY GENERATOR Issued: 12/08/2015 Valuation: $15,000.00 Completed: 09/15/2016
Expiration: 09/15/2016 Updated By: ivelasco
Owner:

Job Description: EMERGENCY GENERATOR AND CONCRETE PAD (FRONT YARD PAVING)

PROJECT INFORMATION
Square Feet (New): Dwelling Units (New): Zone: R-1.X
Square Feet (Existing): Dwelling Units (Existing): Primary Use:

Scope Category:

PEOPLE
Type Name Address Phone License
Architect VINCENT GORMALLY 10752 Charnock Road 3105583944 Applicant CREST REAL ESTATE (E-PLAN) 11150 Olympic Blvd Suite 700 Contractor FORT HILL CONSTRUCTION 12711 Ventura Blvd. Ste. #390

FINANCE
Group Activity Review Paid Balance
BUSINESS_TAX_GROUP $31.88 $0.00 $31.88 $0.00
PERMIT_FEE_GROUP $917.31 $0.00 $917.31 $0.00
PLAN_CHECK_GROUP $1,325.75 $0.00 $1,325.75 $0.00
TOTAL $2,274.94 $0.00 $2,274.94 $0.00

TRANSACTIONS
ID Date Method Amount
398361 05/21/2015 12:00:00 AM CREDIT CARD $1,325.75
414751 12/08/2015 12:00:00 AM CHECK $949.19
Final

PERMIT CONDITIONS

GENERATOR STRUCTURE DATA

GENERATOR STRUCTURE DATA LOCATION WITHIN FRONT YARD SETBACK APPROVED THROUGH CENTRAL R-1 PERMIT FOR ESTATE LOT UNDER PL1409649(PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1734). SETBACKS FRONT (WHITTIER DR): 30'-3 5/8" NORTHWESTERLY SIDE: 30'-0"

FRONT YARD PAVING DATA
FRONT YARD PAVING DATA FRONT SETBACK: WHITTIER DRIVE FRONTAGE - 50 FEET FRONT YARD AREA: 12,546.11 SQ.FT. (WHITTIER FRONTAGE) MAX ALLOWABLE PAVING: 4,390.21 SQ.FT. EXISTING PAVING: 4,173.2 SQ.FT. PROPOSED PAVING: 56 SQ.FT. (FOR NEW GENERATOR PAD) TOTAL PAVING:
4,229.2 SQ.FT. (WHITTIER FRONTAGE ONLY)
Conditions
The report from Ryan accepting the generator with factory built enclosure but without site built enclosure is on OBC Factory built enclosure is F232 Steel.

DEBRIS HAULING

THE CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS IS UNDER EXCLUSIVE CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT WITH CROWN DISPOSAL SERVICES FOR THE HAULING OF ALL CONSTRUCTION RELATED MATERIALS. THIS

INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, EXPORTING CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS FROM JOB SITES WITHIN THE CITY BOUNDARIES. FOR INFORMATION AND OR TO REQUEST HAULING SERVICES, PLEASE CALL (310) 288-2806.

Request An Inspection
TO REQUEST A BUILDING & SAFETY INSPECTION: ONLINE Logon to www.beverlyhills.org/obc TELEPHONE A.) Dial (310) 285-2534 B.) Enter your permit number. (Remember, each permit has a different number.) C.) Enter your phone number to receive the inspectors estimated time of arrival.

Fire Life Safety
When Fire Life Safety Fee have been applied to this permit OR modifications to the Fire Life Safety System Final
have occurred, then prior to operation and/or use of any system or equipment, or occupancy of any temporary and/or permanent facilities, the owner/contractor must call the Fire Department to schedule inspection at (310) 281-2703.

BHMC 7-2-201: HEAVY VEHICLES RESTRICTED TO CERTAIN STREETS HEAVY VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - BHMC 7-2-201: HEAVY VEHICLES RESTRICTED TO CERTAIN STREETS: A. No person shall operate any vehicle having a gross weight, including the vehicle and its load, of three (3) tons or more on any street in the city except on those streets designated in section 7-2-203 of the Beverly Hills Municipal Code. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE TO DISTRIBUTE A COPY OF THIS PERMIT TO ALL OPERATORS OF HEAVY VEHICLES PURSUANT TO THIS CODE. B. The provisions of subsection A of this section shall not apply to the following: 1. Any passenger stage vehicle regulated by sections 1031 through 1036 of the state Public Utilities Code and operating under a certificate from the public utilities commission of the state declaring that the public necessity and convenience require the operation of such vehicle; and further provided that the certificate specifically authorizes such vehicle to be operated in the city, and the vehicle is being operated while in the city for the purpose authorized in such certificate; provided further, this exemption shall not apply to vehicles operated as a round trip sightseeing service; 2. Any vehicle owned by a public utility while necessarily in use in the construction, installation, or repair of any public utility; 3. Any vehicle operated by the city, or any employee thereof, in the course of regular or official city business; 4. Any vehicle of the military or naval forces of the United States or the duly authorized militia of the state in the proper performance of their duties. (1962 Code º 3-6.1306; amd. Ord. 90-O-2088, eff. 2-8-1990)
BHMC 7-2-202: EMERGENCY OR NECESSARY USE OF RESTRICTED STREETS HEAVY HAUL ROUTES - BHMC 7-2-202: EMERGENCY OR NECESSARY USE OF RESTRICTED STREETS: The following vehicles may use a street other than designated in section 7-2-203 of this article under the circumstances herein below: A. Any passenger vehicle while operated, engaged, and used for the sole and exclusive purpose of picking up or discharging a passenger or passengers at an origin or destination on any street in which the vehicle is prohibited; B. Any vehicle when necessary, for the purpose of making pick ups and deliveries of goods, wares, or merchandise from or to any premises located on any prohibited street, or Final
for the purpose of delivering materials on a prohibited street to be used in the repair, alteration, remodeling, or construction of any building or structure for which a building permit has previously been obtained; C. Whenever it is necessary for a vehicle to deviate from the streets designated in section 7-2-203 of this article for the purposes specified in subsection A or B of this section, the vehicle shall travel from a street authorized by section 7-2-203 of this article to the destination by a route so that the point of travel is the shortest possible distance over prohibited streets; provided however, if the additional distance of travel to reach the shortest route would exceed two (2) miles, the vehicle may take the most direct route to its destination. (1962 Code ºº 3-

6.1306, 3-6.1306.1)
BHMC º7-2-203: STREETS DESIGNATED FOR HEAVY VEHICLE USAGE BHMC º7-2-203: STREETS DESIGNATED FOR HEAVY VEHICLE USAGE: Pursuant to Beverly Hills Municipal Code º 7-2-203, the following streets are designated for use by vehicles exceeding a maximum gross weight, including the vehicle and its load, of three (3) tons: Alden Drive; Bedford Drive from Wilshire Boulevard to Santa Monica Boulevard (north); Beverly Boulevard; Beverly Drive from the south city limits to Santa Monica Boulevard (north); Brighton Way from Canon Drive to Wilshire Boulevard; Burton Way; Camden Drive from Wilshire Boulevard to Santa Monica Boulevard (north); Canon Drive from Wilshire Boulevard to Santa Monica Boulevard (north); Civic Center Drive from Burton Way to Santa Monica Boulevard (south); Crescent Drive between the north and south roadways of Santa Monica Boulevard; Dayton Way from Canon Drive to Wilshire Boulevard; Doheny Drive; Foothill Road from Burton Way to Santa Monica Boulevard (south); La Cienega Boulevard; Linden Drive from Wilshire Boulevard to Santa MonicaBoulevard (south); Maple Drive from Burton Way to Santa Monica Boulevard (south); Olympic Boulevard; Rexford Drive from Santa Monica Boulevard (north) to Burton Way; Robertson Boulevard; Rodeo Drive from Wilshire Boulevard to Santa Monica Boulevard (north); Roxbury Drive from Wilshire Boulevard to Santa Monica Boulevard (north); San Vicente Boulevard; Santa Monica Boulevard (north and south roadways); Third Street; Wilshire Boulevard ***FOR OPERATORS

USING LOMA VISTA DRIVE AS THE SHORTEST PATH FROM AN APPROVED HEAVY HAUL ROUTE TO

THE CONSTRUCTION SITE, PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE IS A TRUCK RUN OFF RAMP AT LOMA VISTA DRIVE LOCATED NORTH OF DOHENY ROAD.

BHMC 7-2-205: COMMERCIAL VEHICLES PROHIBITED FROM USING PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS WITHOUT

PERMISSION
BHMC 7-2-205: COMMERCIAL VEHICLES PROHIBITED FROM USING PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS WITHOUT PERMISSION: No person shall operate or drive a commercial vehicle in, on, or across any private driveway approach or sidewalk area without the consent of the owner or occupant of such property if a sign or markings are in place indicating that the use of such driveway is prohibited. For the purposes of this section, a commercial vehicle shall mean a vehicle having a rated capacity in excess of one-half (1/2) ton. (1962 Code º 3-6.803)

OVERSIZE HAULING
OVERSIZE HAULING: Hauling that meets the following criteria may require engineering investigations, routing definition, coordination, police escort, and control of permit movement: (1) Loads in excess of 14 feet wide. (2) Loads in excess of 135 feet in overall length. (3) Loads that are of a weight that require: A) More than a 13-axle, single-vehicle width hauling combination, or B) A 13-axle, single-vehicle width hauling combination with a load deck where the inner axles in the groups bordering the load deck are 40 feet or more apart, or C) Two or more side-by-side vehicles with a combined width of 14 feet or more supporting the load.

Final
The latest Construction Guidelines can be found online at www.beverlyhills.org/COVID19ConstructionGuidelines.

Appendix C.2
Building Permits: Original
Permits of Other Burgess
Properties

Appendix D
DPR Forms
Peer Review, Jan Ostashay, Ostashay and Associates Consulting (OAC) Attachment 6
P.O. Box 542
Long Beach, CA
562.500.9451
1 Ostashay & Associates

CONSULTING
Memorandum
To: Mark Odell, City of Beverly Hills Date: 01/12/2022
From: Jan Ostashay, Principal OAC
Re: PEER REVIEW ASSESSMENT: Historical Resources Assessment - 1001 North Roxbury Drive Overview
At the request of the City of Beverly Hills Community Development Department, Planning Division, Ostashay & Associates Consulting (OAC) conducted a peer review of a historic resources assessment report prepared for the property referenced above. The assessment report entitled “1001 North Roxbury Drive, Historical Resources Assessment” is dated October 2021 and was prepared as a draft document by Environmental Science Associates (ESA) of Los Angeles, California. The ESA report is intended to provide an historic assessment of the subject property to support a “Certificate of Ineligibility” application submitted by the applicant (property owner/owner representative).

This peer review performed by OAC is conducted on behalf of the City to help consider the processing of the “Certificate of Ineligibility” application for the subject property. It addresses the overall adequacy of the ESA assessment report; the development of appropriate historic contexts for the property; application and interpretation of local City of Beverly Hills Landmark Designation Criteria; and the evaluators’ findings and conclusions for local landmark eligibility. The consideration of a property’s eligibility for potential National Register of Historic Places (National Register) and California Register of Historic Resources (California Register) eligibility are irrelevant in the processing of a “Certificate of Ineligibility” application.

Our processin conducting the peer review included an examination of the ESA report and observation of the project site. We also performed additional archival research and reviewed building permits, Sanborn fire insurance maps, historic aerial photographs, prior survey assessments of the area (as applicable), and other primary and secondary sources were collected and reviewed relevant to the property and associated historic contexts and themes.

As stipulated in the City’s Municipal Code, Title 10, Chapter 3, Article 32, Historic Preservation (BHMC 10-3-3212, herein cited as Ordinance), the designation (significance) criteria for recognizing potential landmark eligibility consists of two parts, Part A and Part B, each with their own subset of significance criteria. A property must satisfy all four criteria requirements under Part A and must satisfy at least one of the six criteria under Part B. The ESA report concludes that the 1001 North Roxbury Drive property is ineligible for City of Beverly Hills Landmark designation due to the fact that it does not satisfy Landmark Designation Criteria A.2, A.3, A.4 and B.1, B.2, B.3. B.4, B.5, and B.6.

PEER REVIEW ASSESSMENT: Historical Resources Assessment – 1001 North Roxbury Drive 2 Introduction
Generally, peer reviews of historic resources assessment reports are conducted to reassure lead agencies requesting the assessments that the identification and evaluation efforts performed are adequate, that the eligibility determinations made are logical and well supported, and that the document will, if necessary, facilitate regulatory compliance under the provisions of CEQA and the local municipal code. Review of historic resources documents for quality control is an essential part of the environmental review process.

As a primer, historic resources fall within the jurisdiction of several levels of government. Federal laws provide the framework for the identification, evaluation, designation, and in certain instances, protection of historic resources. States and local jurisdictions play active roles in the identification, recordation, landmarking, and protection of such resources within their communities primarily through their regulatory codes and policies.

The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, promulgated standardized practices and guidelines for identifying, evaluating, and documenting historic properties (Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines [Preservation Planning, Identification, and Evaluation]). The State Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) and most local governments in California recognize these practices and guidelines and recommend their use in order to maintain objectivity and consistency in the preparation of historic preservation documents and survey assessments.

Methodology
To complete this peer review memo, Ms. Ostashay completed the following tasks:
• Reviewed the “Certificate of Ineligibility” application (November 18, 2021) and also reviewed the “draft” historic resources assessment report prepared for the subject property by ESA dated October 2021.
• Reviewed the City’s Historic Preservation Ordinance (BHMC 10-03-32) and prior citysponsored historic resources surveys, survey updates, and historic context statements. As applicable, OAC also reviewed other related survey material prepared in association with SurveyLA, which was a City of Los Angeles sponsored project. • Conducted additional archival research on the history of the subject property; its original owner and builder; physical alterations; past owners and occupants, and immediate the neighborhood. The extent of the research conducted by OAC was limited to what was necessary to assess the validity of the historic context developed and evaluation findings presented in the ESA assessment report. Background research performed included a review of many on-line resources locally and globally from a multitude of diverse research, archival, library, museum, and academic repositories and collections, including the Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals.
• Reviewed relevant National Park Service (NPS) guidance documents on evaluating the significance of potential historic properties. Also searched the National Register online database, the City’s online sources, and OAC’s in-house library for any properties with similar contexts or evaluated under similar criteria as those discussed in the ESA assessment report PEER REVIEW ASSESSMENT: Historical Resources Assessment – 1001 North Roxbury Drive 3 (i.e. association with single-family residential development patterns, architecture and aesthetics, listing in the City’s List of Local Master Architects, etc.). • Considered and analyzed the assessment findings and research presented in the submitted assessment report for validity, clarity, and conformance with the basic professional principles and best practices for identifying and evaluating the significance of potential historic properties.
• Summarized the results of all of the tasks listed above within this memo.

Peer Review Assessment
This peer review performed by OAC was conducted to ensure that the current identification and evaluation efforts of the subject property for potential local landmark eligibility are adequate and that the findings are sound and well justified. The recommended approaches to the identification and evaluation of historic resources as discussed above have also been considered and utilized in conducting this peer review.

General Content and Format
In addition to reviewing and assessing evaluation findings, an important element of peer reviews is the assessment of the clarity of presentation, the adequacy of the research and context development, the understanding and application of significance criteria, and the consideration of historical integrity for which the report findings are based.

OAC found the report to be rather clear and logically organized despite some narrative inadequacies and contextual misinterpretation of research data, discrepancies with the site-specific assessment of historical integrity, and the non-relevant application of National Register and California Register criteria and consideration of the property as a historical resource under the California Environmental Quality Act (not applicable for consideration of an Ineligibility Certificate Application). Nonetheless, much of the overall format and presentation of the material in the report are professionally sound, technically correct, and well organized.

Analysis of Integrity Findings
It is standard practice to assess a property’s integrity as part of a historic evaluation. Integrity is a property’s ability to convey its historic significance through its physical features. The NPS publication entitled National Register Bulletin 15 defines seven aspects of integrity: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. Integrity is the authenticity of a property’s physical identity which is clearly indicated by the retention of characteristics (character-defining features) that existed during the property’s period of significance. The aspects of integrity that are essential vary depending on the significance of the property. However, in assessing a property’s integrity, the National Register criteria does recognize that properties change over time, therefore, it is not necessary for a property to retain all its historic physical features or characteristics. The property must retain, however, the essential physical features that enable it to convey its historic identity.

PEER REVIEW ASSESSMENT: Historical Resources Assessment – 1001 North Roxbury Drive 4 OAC has assessed the subject property’s historic integrity as follows:

Location: The place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred.

The property remains at its original location and, therefore, retains this aspect of integrity.

Design: The combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of a property.

The single-family residence has experienced minimal exterior alterations along those primarily elevations visible from the public right-of-way (its front facade). The modifications made to the rear of the structure and within the backyard area, which are considered secondary elevations and features, have not compromised the overall Regency Revival design, style, and aesthetics of the dwelling. The ESA report also states that “most of the changes have occurred on the rear of the subject property, which is not visible from the public right-of-way. The home’s primary elevation has undergone minimal changes over time and original materials and character-defining features of the home remain largely intact.”1 Those character-defining features that define its historic character, function, aesthetics, style and design, which are primarily located on the front façade, remain substantially intact. Therefore, OAC finds the property retains sufficient integrity of design.

Setting: The physical environment of a historic property.

As seen from the public right-of-way (along Roxbury Drive), the single-family residence under review maintains the original topographic features and spatial relationships between the residence, garage, driveway, front yard landscape, and open spaces as evident from its period of significance (date of completion, 1942). Despite changes to the backyard and rear of the building, which are not visible from the public right-of-way, the basic physical conditions under which the house was built and the functions it was intended to serve remain sufficiently evident. OAC contends the property retains sufficient integrity of setting.

As considered within in its neighborhood surroundings, the property’s residential setting adjacent large affluent single-family homes has been retained. The property’s historic setting within the neighborhood has been moderately altered over time by the demolition of older housing stock for the construction of new larger homes. Nonetheless, the majority of residences that infill the parcels along this block of Roxbury have construction dates prior to World War II, despite some being altered over the years. The overall neighborhood character of the thoroughfare along this tree lined portion of Roxbury share consistent setbacks, landscaped easements and sidewalks, circulation patterns, and varying architectural styles that were established and consistent with the early years of development.

OAC, therefore, believesthe surrounding neighborhood setting is relatively retained.

Materials: The physical elements that were combined or deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to form a historic property.

As the ESA report notes “the home’s primary elevation has undergone minimal changes over time and original materials and character-defining features of the home remain largely intact.”2 They also
note that the window panes of the house have been replaced with dual pane glass, the roof has been replaced (re-roofed), some additional chimneys have been added to the multi-gable roofing system, 1 1001 North Roxbury Drive, Historical Resources Assessment, ESA, October 2021, p. 94. 2 Ibid, p. 94.

PEER REVIEW ASSESSMENT: Historical Resources Assessment – 1001 North Roxbury Drive 5 and the brick veneer has been painted. The window panes were replaced within the original metal window frames, which maintained the visual profile and depth of read of the original framing and glazing system. For safety and general maintenance needs it is common to have the roof replaced and such work was done in-kind and per code. The addition of chimneys occurred primarily along the back half of the house and do not adversely compromise those important characteristics that define the Regency Revival architectural style of the house. The noted concern regarding the painting of the brick veneer is also questionable as it is unknown at this time whether the brick was originally painted white or not (as was also typical of the period and style). These modifications, many of which are rehabilitation or on-going general maintenance items, appear to have been conducted in-kind as to avoid adversely impacting the overall architectural quality and signature character-defining features of the residence. Those character-defining features including the recessed wood paneled front entrance door with rectilinear transom window, arched shaped window openings and associated wood louvered shutters, broken pediments over the entry and window openings, gable roof with a series of wall and roof dormers, polygonal projecting bay windows with standing seam metal roofs, multi-pane fenestration, balconettes with iron railings, and mixed cladding of brick, horizontal wood siding, and smooth plaster sheathing from its period of significance that identify as a Regency Revival style property are still visually and physically evident from the public right-of-way. Therefore, OAC finds the property retains integrity of materials.

Workmanship: The physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory.

Due to the retention of notable historic fabric and associated character-defining features, the property visually and physical retains sufficient integrity of workmanship. Its period craftsmanship, stylistic expression, and 1940s construction techniques continue to be conveyed through intact architectural features, as noted above.

Feeling: A property’s expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time.

As a readily recognizable example of Regency Revival architecture, the subject property is a direct expression of the moneyed architectural aesthetic of the idiom that defined the residential development of Beverly Hills, particularly in the area north of Sunset Boulevard, prior to World War II.

The dwelling has experienced few inappropriate alterations to its main, front elevation, which is highly visible from the public right-of-way, and continues to express the original aesthetic and historic sense from its period of significance. Thus, OAC finds the property retains this element of integrity.

Association: The direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property.

According to NPS guidance, a property possesses integrity of association if it retains the essential physical features that made up its character or appearance during the period of association with an important event or person. While a number of noted individuals owned and occupied the subject property over the years, it was not directly associated with their productive lives when they achieved prominence or significance. The property has sufficient physical and historical integrity; however, it was not found to be significant for its association with historic events or personages, so integrity of association does not apply.

In conclusion, OAC does not concur with the findings made in the ESA report that the property lacks integrity of workmanship, materials, and setting; and that it does not retain integrity to convey the appearance of its original construction intact. In assessing the subject property’s construction history, PEER REVIEW ASSESSMENT: Historical Resources Assessment – 1001 North Roxbury Drive 6 permit history, and historical integrity, it is OAC’s professional opinion that the residence retains the essential physical features (character-defining) that visually and physically conveys the property’s historic character and well-executed Regency Revival architectural style from its period of significance.

Therefore, it retains integrity of location, design, materials, workmanship, association, feeling, and setting.

Evaluation Findings
The City’s Historic Preservation Ordinance establishes historic significance criteria and the process for evaluating (and designating) properties as local landmarks for listing in the City of Beverly Hills Register of Historic Properties (BHMC 10-3-3212). As stipulated in the Ordinance, the significance designation criteria for recognizing potential landmark eligibility consists of two parts, Part A and Part B, each with their own subset of significance criteria. A property must satisfy all four criteria requirements under Part A and must satisfy at least one of the six criteria under Part B. The local City of Beverly Hills Landmark Designation Criteria requirements consist of the following:

A. A landmark must satisfy all of the following requirements:

1. It is at least 45 years (45) years of age, or is a property of extraordinary significance;

2. It possesses high artistic or aesthetic value, and embodies the distinctive characteristics of an architectural style or architectural type or architectural period;

3. It retains substantial integrity3 from its period of significance; and

4. It has continued historic value to the community such that its designation as a landmark is reasonable and necessary to promote and further the purposes of this article.

B. In addition to the requirements set forth in Paragraph A above, a landmark must satisfy at least one of the following requirements:

1. It is listed on the National Register of Historic Places;

2. It is an exceptional work4 by a master architect;5

3. It is an exceptional work that was owned and occupied by a person of great importance, and was directly connected to a momentous event in the person’s endeavors or the 3 In BHMC 10-3-3202, the Ordinance defines “substantial integrity” as “integrity that is considerable in importance, value, degree, amount, or extent, and that continues to exist, or would have continued to exist, but for work done without appropriate permits after the enactment of this architect.” 4 In BHMC 10-3-3202, the Ordinance defines “exceptional work” as “a remarkably superior example of architectural work that has been recognized as such by members of the architectural community. At a minimum, the work’s exceptional quality shall have been documented by at least one of the following: a) it was the subject of a major architectural award; b) it was substantially discussed (i.e. not just mentioned) and photographically depicted in at least two (2) publications (e.g. a book, treatise, trade magazine article, film, or set of photographs made available to the public by an institutional archive) authored by acknowledged experts in the field of architecture. A monograph or publication made available to the public solely in electronic form and without any reasonable expectation of compensation to the author, or substantially authored by the architect of the work, shall not count toward this minimum.”
5 In BHMC 10-3-3202, the Ordinance defines “master architect” as “an architect of widely recognized greatness in the field of architecture whose individual genius influenced his or her age.” BHMC 10-3-3202, the Ordinance also defines “List of Local Master Architects,” as “a list maintained by the city that includes master architects as defined in this article who have designed properties in the city.” PEER REVIEW ASSESSMENT: Historical Resources Assessment – 1001 North Roxbury Drive 7 history of the nation. For purposes of this paragraph, personal events such as birth, death, marriage, social interaction, and the like shall not be deemed to be momentous;

4. It is an exceptional property that was owned and occupied by a person of great local prominence;

5. It is an iconic property;6 or

6. The landmark designation procedure is initiated, or expressly agreed to, by the owner(s) of the property.

The ESA report evaluated the subject property against City of Beverly Hills Landmark Designation Criteria to establish historical significance or lack thereof sufficient enough in processing a “Certificate of Ineligibility” application. ESA found the property ineligible for designation as a City of Beverly Hills landmark as it failed to satisfy all of the requirements under Landmark Designation Criteria part A and any one of the requirements under part B (BHMC 10-3-3212). OAC’s peer review of the evaluation findings for local landmark eligibility is as follows:

A. A landmark must satisfy all of the following requirements:

Criterion A.1. It is at least 45 years (45) years of age, or is a property of extraordinary significance.

OAC concurs with ESA’s finding that the subject property is over 45 years of age and satisfies Landmark Criteria A.1.

Criterion A.2. It possesses high artistic or aesthetic value, and embodies the distinctive characteristics of an architectural style or architectural type or architectural period.

OAC does not concur with ESA’s finding that the subject property does not satisfy Landmark Criteria A.2. The ESA report states the residence is a large example of the Regency Revival style, but otherwise is a non-distinct, fair example of the idiom. The ESA report also states that the property lacks integrity to convey its original construction appearance because of the alterations made to the rear (south secondary, non-visible elevation) of the building. The report goes on to argue that because the window panes within the existing window frames along the primary (front) elevation have been replaced (with dual pane, in-kind glazing) and the roof has been re-roofed (for maintenance purposes), as well as the brick veneer being painted white (which we do not know if it was originally painted white or not) the property sufficient lacks integrity to satisfy this criterion.

As discussed above under Analysis of Integrity Findings herein this memo, the subject property retains the essential physical features that enable it to convey its historic identity. The 1001 North Roxbury Drive residence is a very good, classic example of Regency Revival architecture. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of the idiom through its retention of associated character-defining features, including the recessed wood paneled front entrance door with transom window, arched shaped window openings and associated wood louvered shutters, broken pediments over the front entry and window openings, gable roof with a series of wall and roof dormers, polygonal projecting bay windows with standing seam metal roofs, multi-pane fenestration, balconettes with iron railings, and 6 In BHMC 10-3-3202, the Ordinance defines “iconic property” as “a property that has been visited and photographed so often by residents and visitors to the city that it has become inextricably associated with Beverly Hills in the popular culture and forms part of the city’s identity to the world at large.” PEER REVIEW ASSESSMENT: Historical Resources Assessment – 1001 North Roxbury Drive 8 mixed cladding of brick, horizontal wood siding, and smooth plaster sheathing from its period of significance (1942). In reviewing the permit history, construction of the property began in October 1941 and was completed in early 1942. Those architectural elements that identify the dwelling as a Regency Revival designed structure from the early 1940s are still clearly visually and physically evident from the public right-of-way. It is OAC’s professional opinion that the property satisfies this criterion.

Criterion A.3. It retains substantial integrity7 from its period of significance.

The ESA report states that the property lacks integrity for inappropriate changes made to the rear of the dwelling and its backyard space as well as because of minor maintenance changes to the front facade. OAC does not concur with ESA’s interpretation and analysis of integrity and their finding that the subject property does not satisfy Landmark Criteria A.3. Over the years, the subject property has experienced modifications to its rear elevation and within the enclosed backyard area of the very large parcel. Nonetheless, those elevations that are visually and physically evident from the public right-of-way retain the classic character-defining features of the original design intent and Regency Revival architectural style as envisioned by its designer Carlton Burgess, who is included in the City’s List of Local Master Architects. As discussed in the above paragraphs for Criterion A.2 and under the Analysis of Integrity Findings section of this memo, as seen from the street the property retains the quintessential form, plan, space, and style of Regency Revival residential architecture dating from the early 1940s. Therefore, OAC concludes that subject property sufficiently satisfies Landmark Criterion A.3, as defined in the Ordinance (BHMC 10-3-3202).

Criterion A.4. It has continued historic value to the community such that its designation as a landmark is reasonable and necessary to promote and further the purposes of this article.

OAC does not concur with ESA’s finding that the subject property does not satisfy Landmark Criterion A.4. Despite changes made to the subject property along its rear (secondary) elevation and within the backyard area, those elevations visually and physically evident from the public right-of-way are still intact and continue to convey the property’s historic character from the pre-World II era, distinctive Regency Revival style, and magnitude of design and form. Because of its notable corner location, large deep parcel (double lot), association with master builder and designer Carlton Burgess, and placement along a broad gracefully curved street within in a highly affluent Beverly Hills neighborhood north of Sunset Boulevard the property reflects the rich varied architectural heritage so closely tied to the history of the community. Therefore, it is OAC’s professional opinion that the 1001 North Roxbury Drive property has continued historic value and meets this requirement.

B. In addition to the requirements set forth in Paragraph A above, a landmark must satisfy at least one of the following requirements:

Criterion B.1. It is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.

OAC concurs with ESA’s finding that the subject does not satisfy Landmark Criterion B.1.

Criterion B.2. It is an exceptional work8 by a master architect. 7 In BHMC 10-3-3202, the Ordinance defines “substantial integrity” as “integrity that is considerable in importance, value, degree, amount, or extent, and that continues to exist, or would have continued to exist, but for work done without appropriate permits after the enactment of this architect.” PEER REVIEW ASSESSMENT: Historical Resources Assessment – 1001 North Roxbury Drive 9 OAC does not concur with ESA’s reasoning that the subject property does not satisfy Landmark Criterion B.2. OAC, however, does conclude that the 1001 North Roxbury Drive property does not satisfy this particular criterion as it is not considered an “exceptional work,” as defined in the Ordinance. While Carlton L. Burgess is currently included in the City’s List of Local Master Architects and is considered a master builder who also designed many of his own projects, research undertaken for this peer review, including a review of the Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals, has not found evidence that the property was ever the subject of a major architectural award or was substantially discussed or photographically depicted in a monograph or any other known publications.

Criterion B.3. It is an exceptional work that was owned and occupied by a person of great importance, and was directly connected to a momentous event in the person’s endeavors or the history of the nation. For purposes of this paragraph, personal events such as birth, death, marriage, social interaction, and the like shall not be deemed to be momentous.

OAC concurs with ESA’s finding that the subject does not satisfy Landmark Criterion B.3. To clarify, the property does not satisfy this criterion because it is not considered an “exceptional work,” as defined in the Ordinance. In addition, the property does not qualify under this criterion as it does not satisfy the definition of “person of great importance,” as defined in the Ordinance. The research conducted as part of this peer review did not identify any individuals associated with the property whose activities had a substantial impact on the history of the nation, whose name and exploits were widely known across America during his/her lifetime, and whose fame continues through to the present day.

Criterion B.4. It is an exceptional property that was owned and occupied by a person of great local prominence.

OAC concurs with ESA’s finding that the subject does not satisfy Landmark Criterion B.4. To clarify, the property does not satisfy this criterion because it does not meet the definition of “person of great local prominence,” as defined in the Ordinance. No documentation was found to indicate that any of the owners and occupants of the 1001 North Roxbury Drive property had a substantial impact on the City, and none of them have public streets or parks named after them.

Criterion B.5. It is an iconic property.

OAC concurs with ESA’s finding that the subject does not satisfy this criterion. 8 In BHMC 10-3-3202, the Ordinance defines “exceptional work” as “a remarkably superior example of architectural work that has been recognized as such by members of the architectural community. At a minimum, the work’s exceptional quality shall have been documented by at least one of the following: a) it was the subject of a major architectural award; b) it was substantially discussed (i.e. not just mentioned) and photographically depicted in at least two (2) publications (e.g. a book, treatise, trade magazine article, film, or set of photographs made available to the public by an institutional archive) authored by acknowledged experts in the field of architecture. A monograph or publication made available to the public solely in electronic form and without any reasonable expectation of compensation to the author, or substantially authored by the architect of the work, shall not count toward this minimum.”
PEER REVIEW ASSESSMENT: Historical Resources Assessment – 1001 North Roxbury Drive 10 Criterion B.6. The landmark designation procedure is initiated, or expressly agreed to, by the owner(s) of the property.

OAC concurs with ESA’s finding that the subject does not satisfy Landmark Criterion B.6.

The ESA assessment report also evaluated the subject property for National Register and California Register eligibility. As the consideration of the property’s National Register and California Register eligibility are irrelevant in the processing of the “Certificate of Ineligibility” application, they were not addressed or assessed as part of this peer review.

Conclusion
OAC has completed a professional peer review of a (draft) historic resources landmark assessment report prepared by ESA for the 1001 North Roxbury Drive property. The peer review was conducted by OAC to ensure that the current identification and evaluation findings of the subject property for City of Beverly Hills Landmark eligibility or ineligibility are adequate and that the findings of the ESA report are sound and well justified.

Despite some narrative discrepancies, limited in-depth contextual research on some subject matters, and the misinterpretation and application of historic integrity and the City’s Landmark Designation Criteria, OAC ultimately concurs with the report’s conclusion that the residence located at 1001 North Roxbury Drive does not satisfy the required mandates of the City of Beverly Hills’ Landmark Designation Criteria (BHMC 10-3-3212).

Based on our review of the ESA report and consideration of the additional research material collected and reviewed on the subject property, designer/builder, past and present owners and occupants, and associated historic contexts and themes, OAC findsthe subject property satisfies all four requirements of Beverly Hills Landmark Designation Criteria part A. However, under part B of the Landmark Designation Criteria it is not considered an “exceptional work” by master builder/designer Carlton Burgess (as defined in BHMC 10-3-3202). While Burgess is included in the City’s List of Local Master Architects, the property itself has not been photographically depicted or featured in at least two scholarly works on architecture (or popular journals) nor has it been recognized or won any type of architectural award. The property is also ineligible under Landmark Designation Criteria B.3 and B.4 as it is does not meet the definition of an “exceptional work” and was not owned and occupied by a person of great national or local importance/prominence. In addition, the subject property under review does not satisfy the definition of an “iconic property” (Landmark Designation Criterion B.5) and the property owner has not initiated or expressly agreed to designate the improvement (Landmark Designation Criterion B.6). Please keep in mind that OAC has not considered or evaluated the property for National Register and California Register eligibility. In addition, OAC has not assessed the property for CEQA compliance. Such evaluation assessments are irrelevant to the processing of a “Certificate of Ineligibility” application.

Publications for Review
Attachment 7

87 AOCbE: cnAJlbHH. XyAO)l(HH naee/1 Kan11e8H'l npOKOMMeHnt· poean sap1-1aHTb1 04>opM11eHHR cnaneH PeAaKTOpbl AD CAe11a11111 noA60pKy Kposarei1 �, np111KpOBaTHblX CTO/lHKOB 3asrpaK B noCTe/1111 rnaJaMIII ro1111111ByACKHX KHHeMarorpa4>111cTOB 1,1 HaBeRH· Hble 3TIIIM"1 KaApaMl-1 sap1-1aHTbl ceps1-1pos1rn CHl/ll-lCTa HaTa/11111 06yxosoi1. <Dororpacp 6op11c AHTOHOB. A raK e Kei.n rr
nene. T1-111bAa Cy1,1HTOH "'Apyrne JBeJAbl y ce6R B cnanbHR' 112 PEMECno. X0Js11-1H 1,na11bRHCKoi1 Me6enbttoi1 ¢a6p1-11<1-1 Oak Pe· Haro no110HbR o6bRCHlll/1, no4eMy OH AOBepReT lllOARM 6011bwe. 4eM KOMnbt0Tepy. 6eceAOBana 81eHa l111b11Ha.
114 PEKBH3"1T. Apx1,neKTop AneKceii r11ttJ6ypr paccKaJa11. KaK 06yCTpo11rb KaMHHHYIO JoHy. a peAaKTOpbl AD co6pam1 B MO· CKOBCKIIIX MaraJHHaX caMble Kpac1-1Bble KaMI-IHHble noprallbl 122 TAnAHT. AapbR KoTe11bH11Koea npeppas11ReT apx1-1TeKTopa 3MaHyJ11y 6eHeAern1 "'ee HOBaTOpCKYIO Ko1111eKL111IO Mera1111114ecK11x caernJlhHW<OB ,\ml '<OMnaHHH Baga. 126 B rocr x. KH::!li<tW 0/lbrc'! AHApeesHa PoMaHOBa noKaJa!la AD ceoe noMeCTt� u anrnHi7fcKoM rpaqicrne KeHT. Tei<cr Aop11c WeepoH. (l)o,orp c!> /J;t'< t!a·raH n11ei1ep.
134 YWnA e 'fHU,. JJ,e1<op210p EKarep1-1Ha KoTOBa 0¢opM�111a ceoio MOCKOBCKYIO ,rnapr�p�· B t-enbntikKOM crnne. TeKCT AHaCTaCHH Por-1awKe8H4. (l)ororpJ'll Y�rnb�M YJ6cTep.
140 TEPPl,1 MHKOnU'ITO. Apx11reKTop Ky11HnaH Tepp111 nocrpo1111 e noHAOHe e111111y 8eHero·. ,c:oropa11 HanoM�1Haer naMsnH11K ap x11TeKfYpb1 TeKcr 6ap6apb1 CroJmH. <DoTOrpacj> PeHe Cro::111rn. 146 OT BOPOi noBOPOT. Apx11reKTop MapK Pt-1oc noMo r xoJ1111· HY AOMa B 6esep1111-X1-111n3 eepHyTbCR B 1960-e roAb'- TeKCT AoMHHHKa 6pJA6ep11. <Doro rpacp PH'lapA nay3pc.
156 KPEnOCTHASl 3AB"1C"1MOCTb. Apx1-1re1<rop CDpaHcya Hap6oH 111 AeKoparop KeHT 3pn orpeCTaep11poean111 crap111HHblH JaMoK so <DpaHLI"'"'· TeKCT A>1<oaHHbl TopHHKpocj>r. CDororpacj> AHApeac cpoH Ai1H3HAe/1b.
164 KPACHASl APMHSl BCEX C"1JlbHEli1. Me6enb l\Bera cosercKoro crRra. <Dororpacj> 6op1-1c 6eHAHKOB. Crn11t-1cr Hara1111R 06yxosa. np0At0cepb1 Hara11b!I 0Hy¢pei14YK 11 KceHHR 01J.1en1<osa. 170 4EM AOKA>KEWb? Apx111reKTop Onbra CDpei1MaH paccKaJana o TOM, KaK Ha nporn>KeHt-111 ABeHaAL1aT11 ner cOJAaeana HHTepbep ceoei1 MOCKOBCKOH KBapn1pb1 TeKCT AttacraCHH PoMaWKeBH4. <Dororpacj> <l>pHL\ q>OH Aep Wy11eH6ypr.
178 KOrAA AEPEBbSl 6blm1 sonbWHMH. AMep1-1KaHel\ CrnseH K1-1paH nocrpo111n ce6e AOM, 1<oropbli1 He Mewaer np1-1p0Ae Te<CT Po6epa KonoHHbl A'l1crp1-1a. <Dororpacj> )KaH-<l>paHcya )Kocco. 186 KOHKYPC. AD nOABOAI-IT t-1ror11 KOHKypca Ha 11y4w1-1� 1-1ttrepbep cpeA"' Yt-1rare11eH >KypHana.
188 AEJ10 BKYCA. reHepa11bHblH A"1peKTOp "HTB-nrnoc· .[].1-11-1rp1,1� CaMOXHH paccKaJan o AOCTOHHcreax Kpecna Ball no A"Ha�HY 3po Aapttt-10. 3am1ca11a TaTb!IHa <l>H1111nnosa.
191 won-TYP . .[].eKoparop ,[].Hatta 6anawoea npownacb no HOBblM Me6enbHblM canoHaM MoCKBbl TeKCT AHacraCl1H PoMawKeBl1'l.

CDororpacj>bl RKoB T11roe 1-1 AMHTpHH nonoe.
200 HEABH>K"1MOCTb . .[].oMa �1 1<eapn1pbl B Moc ee
202 CBETCKAR XPOHHKA.
204 ENGLISH SUMMARY.
206 A,QPECA.
208 roPSl4ASl AECSITKA. MoAenbep Wopb 4anypHH pacc1<aJb1aae1 o ceo�,x 11t061-1MblX �,ecrax �1 ee�ax
...

06wHTblii AepeeoM
HaMHH - nepeoe, sto nonaAaercn Ha rn KaMHH -
nepeoe, sro nonaAaetcn
Ha rnaJa a3a AblMOXOA
He craeaaeaeaeeanH
.::. ·-•1
',
�- -, .,._ -..., .
. . . .. -.� ' . . .. ·
06wHTblH 11epeeoM
TOOOOOKaMHH - nepeoe,
�To nona11aeTcR Ha rnua ...

J]blMOX0/1 He cranH 06wH�"
TblM 11epeeoM KaMHH -
nepeoe. �To nona11aeTcR
Ha rnaJa JlblMOX0/1 He CT

BhlX pcmCHHA 111,1 OTlca3aJIHCb - J:I0M npoeKT11poean 11" Aa'-!a n0JI}"fHJl2Cb
KB2,lq)aTHblX
CICpOMHOA. IIno�aJU, ecero CT0 B0CCMbACCl!T
MeTpOB, <l>aca.A OOIDHT C0CH0BblMH J:I0CKaMH. "3To
JSC BMCIUCllhlC moAH, OHH DOHHMalO'r, 'IT0 Ha Aa 'IC HH K '-ICM)' ropo.rurn, xopo111,1", - rosopH"r airrop npoeKTa. 11 A06ae,rneT, '11'0 HJCaMH COCTaBJJCHHOC 3aJCl311
TeX33,AaHHC fMCiqaJJOCb Ha Kp0UIC'IH0M nHCTKe -
TIDb DCJ>C'ICHb Heo6XOJUUO,IX nOMClllCHHA. B eonp0Cbl CTHnJI JC/IHCHTbl HC BMClllHIWIHCb. "jl OlfCHb mo6mo <I>p3HKa Jln0AAa PaATa, HO nCCBJ:IOpaATos�a. KOT0pyio ceA'laC see CTp0l!T B TIOAMOCKOBbe, )')KC Ha611na OCKOMHH)', - 3aJJMJICT O11er. - TI03TOMY JI crapanc11 �IH'-lero He KOnHpoeaTb, a CAenaTb '-!TO-TO ceoe - 6onee npOCTOro H Aa'IHOfO BHAa". B HTOre O Pa�Te 3ACCb HanOMHHalOT pa3Be '-lTO 1m1pOKHe orp:l)KJ\eHHll 6:lllK0- 1-!0B, nOA'-!CpKHBalOU\He ropH30HTanb nocrpoA
KH.UBeTOBaJJ raMMa e J\OMe CACp)KaHHaJI, '-1CpHo-6enaJJ. "5lpKHe KpacKH n nt06nt0 TOnbK0 e BHJIC He6onbl1IHX BKnlO'-leHHA, - npH3H3eTCJI Oner. - 11 noTOM MHe XOTenOCb BOCC03A3Tb
aTMOCcpepy CT:lpb!X COBeTCKHX A:l'-1. KoHe'-lHO, He C T04KH 3peHHJI apXHTeKT)'Pbl, Ho 011\)'lJ\eHHe 6eCL\BeTHOCTH TaM TO)Ke Architectural Digest 000
000 Architectural Digest
O6WHTblM AepeaoM
TOOOOOKaMHH - nepeoe,
�TO n �TO nonaAaeTCA
Ha rnna /lblMOXOA He
cranH O6wH onaAaeTtA
Ha rnaJa /lblMOXOA He
TblH A �TO nonaAaeTCA
Ha rnaJa /lblMOXOA He
np11cyrcTBosaJ10".npo'!eM, an1occpepa - 3TO He apx11TeKT}'Pa 11 fla)KC I 1e qscrosoe peweHHe, a 06pa3 )KIIJHH, KOTOpblH /IHK1)'CT IIHTCpbep. B 3TOM CMblCJle yCTpOeH /IOM ACHCTBHTenbHO CTapOMO/IHO. 311ecb, HanpHMep, He npHHRTO npoBOAHTb speM.R 11a K)'XHe no JacTOHHOMY 06ht'la10, nepewe11meMY" s Hosy10 )KHJHb, 3oHa roTOBKH BbIHCCeHa s npOXOAtty!O KOMHaTKY, me npHCeCTb npocro Her11e. A CTOnOB}'IO
apxHTeKTop HapO'!HO YCTPOHJl B ApyroM K0Hqe A0Ma. -�
n106n10, Kor11a nlOAH 06ma10TCJI, CHAR 3a CT0n0M. Ho K)'X0HHblC n0CH,llenKH - 3T0 IlJI0xaJI Tp3/IHJ.VUI", - C'll1T3CT Oner.

CTeHa, Ha qxme KOTOpoA CT0HT 06e11eHHblH CT0n, o6nrn-ra T0HHp0BaHHblMH flY60BblMH naHeJIJIMH. Bpo11e 6bl npocro, OJ\ HaK0 AOCTaT0'!H0 TpyAOCMK0. B A0Me B006ute Macca c11enat1- Hb1X Ha 3aKa3 npe,llMCT0B: KaMHHH
b(H TT0PTaJI, ABCpH, BCTpoeHHble LllKacf>bl. "fyrnall pa6o-ra a P0CCHH CT0HT 11opmtce, 'ICM a Espone. 3aTO Thi 3K0H0MHIDb Ha A0CT3BKe, - rosopHT Kno,l{T. - 11 B pe3ynbTaTe 3a Te )l(e ACHbrH TTOJl)"laemb ID'l)"ltty!O Beuth". Ho 3K0H0MHll 3K0H0MHeA, a K0nee'IHblM 3T0T mrrepbep He Ha30Belilb. ,llaJKe CCJlH BblHeCTH H3 A0Ma BCIO I\H3aAHepCICYIO Me6em,, 0ll1}'II\eHHe YJOT3 H BHHMaHHe IC AeTaJUIM 3AeCb ace paBH0 OCTattyrCll. A 3TO caMO no ce6e 11opororo CT0HT. np11JHaeTc11 Oner. - 11 nOT0M

C11g/,-J/, Summar'/
p. 16 EOITOR"S LETTER
Russian designers who make
interesting furniture can be
counted on the fingers of one
hand. And we have already
written about them. Russian
decorators who can create European grade interiors use -foreign material": both the furniture
and the ideas behind all good
Russian designs are imported.

How, in this case, is one to put
together a -Russian· issue?
In our Russian consciousness,
the touchstone for design quality
is similarity to anything foreign.

In this sense. Peter the Great,
with his kowtowing to the West,
was a trailblazer. On the other
hand, we love to complain that
our designers lack independence.

But let us try again lo remember
that the historical high points of
the Russian interior were not the
work of Russians: our baroque,
our Empire, all our great palaces
are stylizations - western design
idioms adapted for Russian
tastes. The same is true today.

So what is the problem? We are
merely maintaining a national
tradition.

In this issue there is an apartment designed under the influence of the Belgian style. Yet just look at those gray walls, at
the stove, at the light that could
not exist anywhere else - this is
a Moscow apartment. Then tell
me. what difference does it make
where a person finds inspiration,
if the result Is unique? I know
the answer: inspiration has no
nationality. I proudly put decorator
Ekaterina Kotova·s apartment on
the cover of AD. And by the way,
this is the first time in the history
of our magazine that a Russian
issue has a Russian apartment
on the cover.

Eugenia Mlkullna
p. 44 IN BLACK AND WHITE
Interview by Alexey Tarkhanov
Welt-known Russian architect
Nikolay Lyzlov always wears black
and white: he says the limited
color scheme helps srmplrfy
the process of getting dressed
in the morning But he does
not se•k 5'-'c:h 51mple solutions
m hr& 1rc:hitect&rre. The creator
of a number of famous recent
204 Architectural Digest
Moscow buildings and a partIcIpant in the 2008 architectural Bienalle in Venice, Lyzlov never
shows up at a site with readymade, schematic solutions. Every one of his architectural designs
is the result of intense mental
effort and the desire not to follow
any style: he does only what the
location and the task require,
be it minimalism or classicism.
which, 1nc1dentally, he interprets
broadly, from the temple in
Paestum to the Jeep Defender.

For Nikolay, the most important
thing is to avoid anything superfluous: "Beauty should not cost any extra money. Funcl1onal1ty by
itself is aesthetically pleasing·.
p, 87 LAY YOUR BODY DOWN
Editor Daria Kotelnikova
The month"s Dossier is about
bedrooms. Theatrical designer
and textile creator Pavel Kaplevich comments on design solutions for this room. A□·s
editors pick out ideal combinations of beds and bed stands.

Style editors suggest breakfast in
bed inspired by the movies from
"How to steal a million·· to "The
Queen·· . Finally, enjoy a photo
story of celebrities in their bedrooms, including footballer Pele and supermodel Kate Moss.
p. 126 A NEST OF THE GENTRY
Text Doris Chevron
Photos: Jonathan Player
Provender Manor in County
Kent is seven hundred years old.

In 1942 its owner, Nadine Sylvia
Ada McDougall married Andrey
Alexandrovich Romanov, Tsar
Nikolay ll's eldest nephew. The
current owner Is their daughter,
Princess Olga. Nine years ago,
when she inherited the property,
the manor was in a wretched
state. Fixing the leaky roof alone
cost upwards of a m1ll1on pounds
sterling. But the princess had
no doubt that her mission was to
return the manor to its erstwhile
brilliance. "This Is where my
mother and grandmother lived,
therefore 11 is my home, too·.

Together with British telev1s1on
host and architect Ptolemy Dean,
Olga split up the restoration work
into six steps As of today, two
of the steps have been completed the guest wing hast� renovated - where the ow"e·
now lives - and the Russ,a�
wing, where her father s s • ·:
room was located, Is finis ec •
Now Olga Andreyevna and Dea·
will work on restoring the faca:e
and the leaky roof. ·we are to·a
dependant upon financing . 0 ;a
admits. In order to earn mone,
for further renovation she no·
only has rented out finished
sections of the estate, she also
has had to sell some of her taro
··During my childhood this was
a happy home·, she says, • I war·
my grandchildren to remember
it the same way
..
.
p. 134 INTO THE SHADOWS
Text Anastasia Romashkevich
Photos William Webster
"Ifs getting harder and harder
to love Moscow, and I wanted
to crea•e an atmosphere where
I could shut out the city in my
apartment" says decorator Ekaterina Kotova. The interior came together after a trip to Belgium.
which Yekaterina made with
her colleagues from the SUITE
Home Interiors bureau. Primaril,
this concerns color: everything
here Is gray. -in Belgium this
Is color number one·· . Ekaterina
explains. ·1 do not understand
how it could be seen as gloomy
or boring·. A part of the furniture also comes from Belgium Objects in the home, though, are
few and almost all of them are
large. ··1 tried to keep the scale
of things large·· . she says "While
It may seem strange, because
of this the rooms seem larger·
Several obiects repeat from room
to room. There Is a pair of 1denl1
cal consoles; there are three
hanging pendant lights. and the
lounge chairs In the bed room
have the same shape as the armchairs in the sitting room ··rh,s technique relaxes the space·,
Ekaterina explains And indeed.
in the apartment quiet, calm,
and divine grace reign
p. 146 DECORATE AND GO
Text Dominic Bradbury
Photos Richard Powers
American entrepreneur David
Bohnett Is crazy about real
estate He regularly switches
homes and apartments
1nvanably entrusts the1r dea,rarch1tect Mark Rios TheiT latest collaborative pro1ect 1s a mansion
in Beverly Hills. David recer,-ed
the home in good condrt1on,
however, work on renovations
took three years. He wanted
a home in the style of the 1960s
and searched for a long time for
genuine furniture of the penod at
antique auctions. He decided that
every room in the mansion would
have its own character: With this
approach there 1s a nsk of getting
not a home but a smorgasbord.
but we tied the spaces together
with color and ornamentation-.

Rios says, ··1 am glad that the
result was an integral interior.
rather than an assortment or
rooms", The client 1s also satisfied with the results of the work, "I like it that there are no dead
spots in the home - we really
use all the rooms everyday", says
David. However the future of the
mansion is uncertain. Bohnett
has already purchased a new
apartment in New York and, as
usual. assigned the decorating
work to Rios. Therefore, another
move is on the horizon.
p. 170 PROOF OF LIFE
Text Anastasia Romashkevich
Photos Fritz von der
Schulenburg
Olga Freiman, lead architect
for the bureau II Centro Nuovo,
and her husband began decorating their apartment twenty years ago. According to Freiman, the
interior came together spontaneously. At first it was decorated with furniture in the Art Nouveau
style, later objects of the Empire
style began appearing in the
home. And while in theory Empire and Art Nouveau do not go together. here they exist superbly
side by side. Over the last twenty
years the owners never once felt
the temptation to redecorate.
-we now have the opportunity
to fill every room with antiques.
but what for?"
Designers often say that a home
they just finished dec:oraung
looks like people had lived in it
for many years. Traces of the
passage of time are easy to fake,
but the real age of an interior
p.171
Sl"OIIW'S -? � �-
s a;;ar !?le": does
,s so !act
c;, THE TREES WERE BIG
Tot
Photos
Robert Colonna d"lstria
Stephen
Jea.n-Fran�ols Jaussaud
Kieran of the Philadel-
. an:hitectural bureau K1eran
Ti berlake has promoted the
tosophy of ecological architect re for more than twenty years.

The best example of what Kieran
believes in ,s hrs summer house
on Taytors Island in Maryland.

In this idyllic setting Stephen
built a grown-up version of a tree
house. or rather a house among
the trees. He erected a framework
of aluminum beams and supports and then filled in the spaces with wooden panels to make the
floors, ceilings, and walls of the
house. And in order not to wound
the earth by digging a foundation,
the building was put on piles. The
interior accentuates the pre-fabricated, dismountable construction:

Stephen did not cover the joints
and bolts. All colors are natural:
wood looks like wood, metal
like metal. The furniture is also
restrained, be it 'design classics·
from the 1960s or custom-made
pieces. The main thing is that the
colors inside do not clash with
the natural environment outside.

As a result, the aim of building
a home inspired by a child's play
house led lo brilliant results in
the form of smart, subtle, and
absolutely grown-up architecture.
p. 191 DIANA THE HUNTRESS
Text Anastasia Romashkevich
Photos Yakov Titov
and Dmitry Popov
Well-known Russian decorator
Diana Balashova visited four new
furniture stores in Moscow for
AD. At Gala Design she discovered armchairs for her latest project. At Interior Market she
demonstrated respect for a classic of contemporary design. The interiors at the Names boutique
became an excuse for a conversation about what a store ought lo have to make its customers
to feel at home. At Piacere she
was attracted to furniture in the
Art Deco style and massive obiects made of leather and metal.

AD
In Russia
Conde Nast Ru�s,u I 1, btd 7, Botshay,1 Om1trovkoil
Strr.et, Moscow. 125099, Ru�s1oi1
MP.phone (4?51745 5565
In the USA
The ConM Nil',l Publ1ca1ton� Inc
Chairm.1n S I NEWHOUSE. JR
Prcs1d�nt & CEO CHARLES H TOWMSENO
Ed1lorial Director I HOMA!> J WALLACE
In other countries
Conde Nast 1n1crnat1onJt Ltd
Chdirman JONArHAN NEWHOUSE
Vic� Prc,1d�nls

NICHOLAS COLERIDGE, GIAMPAOLO GRMIOI
and JAMES WOOi HOUSE
Oir,,rlor of Pt�nrt", I JAMES WOOLHOUSE
Vic,! f'r �•tlrnt N II M�rkPb C/lROL CORNUAU
Vire f'rcs1d•n1 [:lll.,.,11 Dirr•.lodlPt1�••drk •t,
MIMt HARVEY
l.J,r,., tor r,I l ct!'nr. •r: t ..N, w Ou-:,1('1 ."i � NATf...i('H/• vON LAFFFR r
r �•IOrl.:JI D1 ·,,; lllr tll"N M.ir,"1•,·
• tE.Yr.NnRA HARNOf l
ro-�-dnor 1, 1� :>xiii�- JAMES WOOl.'iOIJSE
•1,,.,
. Prt I' •n rt.11 of ·JI o,'.velopmP.n! . .A'S1d 0 Pa�1f,c tll W'Y PILCH£C;
I r,· , C n lo�l lntr,rMllOna 0,q,:.it
J HI !I 1:�IEL !)
,.,.,, cone: :., rou1· of Maguln.s Includes,
u; l Of)&.:. )11 et.t•,r at 01') ,, ½. 1mo ,r.
9, I , I r,1 r i1r i::u ,et1 GC, 11< ,ty Fa•
Gnu• ,.. 'i :- I ' ) , l, !1� •. AiltJl1!, '/bred,
L,ioy, t,
' /lo! • ,� I. ·•· YotkN. W, O •l,1,l:,,
C·o� ' •,;, :,,:1, (
·
c'f Oi1• . Goll World
UK' 0'1\J•: H , , �. ,-1 d �. Rr,1 · e,. Scn,ng JP
HorrP, T-1tler :: ·r.r•rl,' lnt,•r1or ;, GO. Vanity F.,,.

CN l•Jwil�. O'nrr ,,. Cor,,Ji NJsl Jot,anser ,.
l·d·,i I 1•11n9 GO Slyl1;, Love. Wired
Froncl! Vogu", Voq•te Hommes ln1erna11onal
AO, Olarnour, Vogue Coltrctoons. GO
Italy Vogue, L Uomo Voguc, Vogue Bambino, Glamour,
VoguP Gio1cllo, Vogue Pelle, Vogue Sposa, AO.

Spo:;abctla. CN Traveller, GO, Nozze In.

Vanity Fair, GO Style. Wired
Germany Vogue, GO, AD. Glamour.

GO Style. Myself
Spain Vogue, GO. Vogue Novias, Vogue Ninos,
Sposabella, CN Traveler, Vogue Cotecciones,
Vogue Belleza. Glamour, Vogue Joyas, Vogue
Complementos, Sposabelta Portugal. AO, Vanity Fa,r
Japan Vogue, GO, Vogue Hommes
Taiwan Vogue, GO
Russia Vogue, GO, AO, Glamour,
GO Style, Taller
Mexico and Latin America Vogue Me,oco and L1ton
America, Glamour Mex,co and Laton Amenca
AO Mexico, GO Mexico
India Vogue, GO
Published under License,
Australia (Published by News Magazonesl Vogue.

Vogue Loving, Vogue Enterta1n,n9, Travel. GO
Brazil (Published by Carta Ed1tonat Ltdal
Vogue. Casa Vogue, Homem Vogue. RG Vog J
Bulgaria I Published by llbens Med,a Group SA .

Bulganol Glamour
China (Published under copynght cooperation
by Ch,na P,ctonall Vogue.
tpubhshed by IOGI Modern Brode, lpubtoshed under
copynght cooperauon by Women or Ch,nal Sell
Greece IPubl,shcd by llbons Pubhcatoons SA I
Vogue, Glamour, Lucky. House & Garden, CN Traveller
Hungary (Published by Axel Spnnger Budapest
K1ado1 Kft I Glamour
Korea (Published by Doosan Magazine! Vogue. GO,
Vogue Gort. Allure. W
Pouind IPubloshed by G • J Media Sp. z o o.l GtJmour
Portugal (Published by Ed1rev1stas Soc,edade
Ed1tonat SA I V09ue, GO
Romania I Published by Lobens Publications SA I
Glamour.GO
South Alric.- (Pubhshed by Conde Nast
Independent Magazines (Ptyl Ltd I House & Garden.

GO, Glamour
Sweden IPubt,shed by Bonnier Tidsknlter AB(
Glamour
The Netherlands (Published by G • J Nedertandl
Glamour
Russian-English Translation Provided by Applicant and Staff Attachment 8
1001 North Roxbury Drive
Russian – English Translation for Architectural Digest Russia article Informal Translation provided by Applicant Team (George Mihlsten), 3-18-2022 Note: The sentences highlighted in bold appear to relate to the property in question.

Page 1 ends

146. Turn At the Gate. Architect Mark Rios helped an owner of the Beverly Hills house to return to the 1960s.

Page 2 ends

Decorator Ekaterina Kotova decided that gray is the best color for her central Moscow apartment. English architect Quinlan Terry built a mansion in London, that you cannot tell from authentic buildings of XVIII century. Businessman David Bonett and his architect Mark Rios transformed a house in Beverly Hills into a nature reserve of 1960s style.

French-American family with two kids moved into a restored XI century French castle.

Architect Olga Freiman showed AD interior design of her Moscow apartment, that she’s been working on for 12 years. American architect Steven Kiran decided to get harmonious with nature by building an adult version of a kids treehouse. *There are two longer paragraphs on this page but they do not seem to be relevant to this house.

Page 9 ends

…”Our summer house turned out to be modest. Total 180 sq. meters with siding made of pine planks. “These are reasonable people, they understand that you do not need a mansion’, says project designer. And adds that technical requirements were written on a small piece of paper, only a list of necessary rooms. Clients did not interfere with a style requests.” “I love Frank Lloyd-Wright, but pseudo-Wright that everyone is building – everyone is sick of it, declares Oleg.-That is why I tried not to copy anything, but to create something unique, more of a simple and vacation house style”. At the end, the only thing that reminds us of Wright is the wide fences of balconies, that emphasize horizontal built.

Color palette is muted, black and white. “I love bright colors only in small additions, confesses Oleg. –And then I wanted to re-create an atmosphere of old soviet vacation homes. Certainly, not from an architectural stand point. But a mood of colorlessness was also present”.

Page 10 ends

But mood is not an architecture, and not even a color solution, which is being dictated by designer. In this case the house is really arranged in old-fashioned style. Here, for example, you are not going to spend much time in a kitchen as was the custom during Soviet Period of Stagnation (1970s) custom, which flowed into a new life. Prep kitchen is moved into a pass-through room where you cannot even sit down. Architect built a dining room in an opposite side of the house. “I love that people interact by sitting down at the table. But informal kitchen gathering is a bad tradition”, Oleg thinks. A dining room wall behind the table is finished with toned oak panels. Sounds simple, but it’s a lot of work.

House has a lot of custom built-in subjects: mantelpiece fireplace, doors and built-in closets. “Hand-made work in Russia is more expensive than in Europe, but you are saving on delivery fees”, says Klodt. “And as a result, for the same money you are getting a custom thing”. But savings aside, you would not call this design cheap. Even if you remove all the designer furniture from the house, a feeling of comfort and attention to detail will remain. And that in itself is very precious, reveals Oleg. And then…(cuts off). 1001 North Roxbury Drive
Russian – English Translation for Architectural Digest Russia article Informal Translation provided by Staff, 3-18-2022
Note: The sentences highlighted in bold appear to relate to the property in question.

Description on 146 - Part of Table of Contents Page
Translation:

The architect Mark Rios helped the Beverly Hills homeowner go back to 1960’s. Text by Dominica Bradbarry, Photography by Richard Powers.

AD Page
Translation:
[A majority of the article does not pertain to the subject property and discusses other properties in other
countries]. AD Interiors – Decorator Yekaterina Koto…shina decided that gray is most often suitable for the walls of her apartment in the center of Moscow. The English architect Quinlan Terry built a mansion in London, which cannot be distinguished from the true buildings of the XVIII century. [The following sentence is the only sentence on the page that indirectly references the subject property].

Entrepreneur David Bonett and his architect Mark Rios
turned the Beverly Hills house into a 1960’s style reserve. [The remainder of the page discusses different properties located in different countries]. A Franco-American family with two children settled in a restored castle of the twentyfirst century in France. Architect Olga Freiman showed AD her apartment in Moscow, the interior of which was built up for twelve years. American architect Stephen Kieran
decided to achieve harmony with nature, for which he built an adult version of a children's tree house in Maryland.

Photo Pages:

Translation:

A wood-lined fireplace is the first thing that catches the eye. They did not install/stand-up a chimney.

Interior Page: Avolkosku
Translation:
[Statement/sentence is incomplete and does not seem to pertain to subject property] Usually, builders use plywood for draft work. Archduke Claudt believes that this is a universal finishing material. At first he used it in the city, and now he used it in the Moscow region.

Interior Photo Pages with Identical Captions:

Translation:
[Statement/sentence is incomplete] Tomok sculpture by Peter Claudt and one of the founders of the Erman architectural bureau….

Interior Photo Pages:

Staff Comment:

The captions do not correspond to the photos and seem to be in a language other than Russian.

Articles:
1)
Staff Comment:

The article above is out of context and is fragmented.
2)
Translation:

I designed the house. "The cottage turned out to be modest. The area is only 180 square meters, the facade is sheathed with pine boards. "These are sane people, they understand that there is no need to build mansions in the country," says the author of the project. And he adds that the technical task drawn up by the customers fit on a tiny piece of paper - just a list of necessary requirements. Clients did not interfere with style issues. "I love Frank Lloyd Wright very much, but the pseudo-rightist that everyone is building in the Moscow region has already filled his teeth," Oleg says. "That's why I tried not to copy anything, but to make something of my own - a simpler and more suburban look." As a result, the Wright here is only reminded of the wide railings of the balconies, emphasizing the horizontal of the building. The color scheme in the house is restrained, black and white. "I like bright colors only in the form of small inclusions," Oleg admits. - And then I wanted to recreate the atmosphere of the old Soviet summer houses. Of course, not from the point of view of architecture. But the feeling of colorlessness was also present there." By the way, the atmosphere is not architecture or even a color solution, but a way of life that dictates the interior. In this sense, the house is really old-fashioned. Here, for example, it is not customary to spend time in the kitchen according to a stagnant custom that has passed into a new life.

The cooking area is taken out into a walk-through room, where there is nowhere to sit down. And the architect deliberately arranged the dining room at the other end of the house. "I love it when people talk while sitting at the table. But kitchen gatherings are a bad tradition," Oleg believes. The wall against which the dining table stands is covered with tinted oak panels. It seems to be simple, but it is quite timeconsuming. There are a lot of custom-made items in the house in general: a fireplace portal, doors, builtin wardrobes. "Handmade in Russia is more expensive than in Europe. But you save on delivery," says Klodt. - And as a result, you get a piece thing for the same money." But saving is saving, and you can't call this interior a penny. Even if you take all the designer furniture out of the house, the feeling of comfort and attention to detail will still remain here. And that in itself is worth a lot. Oleg admits. - And then… [Article cuts off].

Attachment 9
Applicant Correspondence
Mr. Ryan Gohlich
Director, Community Development Department
City of Beverly Hills
455 N Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 902210
Sent via email to: [email protected]
May 2, 2022
Dear Ryan,
I’m writing to address the potential historic status of 1001 Roxbury Drive, Beverly Hills, which I understand is currently being considered.

I’ve had a long history with the property. I had the unique opportunity to partner with two separate owners, David Bohnett and subsequently Lisa and Josh Greer, for full remodel and revisioning projects.

The piece from LUXE magazine was a publication of my work on this property.

I hope you know from our past work in Beverly Hills, that I am an avid supporter of Architectural Historic Preservation. I can fondly list the historic buildings we’ve helped to preserve and restore within the city, and we continue to work to protect and add to the city’s important architectural resources. I support and applaud everyone in Beverly Hills who passionately works to protect and maintain this irreplaceable historic resource.

Our first project at 1001 Roxbury was for David Bohnett in 2004 when he purchased the house. The house had been subject to multiple remodels, additions, and modifications over the years, and it did not resemble its current form. At that time, my office did our own research in an attempt to find precedent and guidelines to “clean it up,’” but found nothing significant or helpful; we realized it was a typical LA house which had evolved over time, based on its owners, without any original architectural position or pedigree. We worked at that time to edit, modify, change, delete, and clean up the interior and exterior of the house to give it a sense of completeness, balance, and integrity, which never had previously existed. Our work included altering building mass, doors, window, roof changes, removing prior additions and adding new elements to give the house a sense of timeless style. I am humbled that it seems we achieved our intent with these recent changes. We accomplished our goal of giving it dignity where it may not have originally existed.

Significant effort also went into the site during that initial remodel, the result of which also contributes to the misconception of this being a historic property. The prominent, highly visible front and side landscape was highly edited and simplified to create its allusion of stately grandeur and elegance. Years of complicated, fussy planting beds, flowers, hedges, small fences, misaligned trees, etc. were removed, aligned, and reconsidered to create the simplicity which currently gives 1001 Roxbury a strong sense of presence. Again, these landscape designs were a recent design intervention to create a timeless landscape that established a visual story for the house.

The interiors for David Bohnett were quite elaborate and pushed the idea of Hollywood Regency, much beyond the overall classic appearance of the exterior. At that time, David was amassing a large collection of famous regency and modernist furniture, and the setting we curated for this collection was specific and unique, substantially different from the conceptions of the exterior architectural forms. The LUXE piece was a documentation and celebration of this interior/decorative work and David’s unique furniture collection, not a commentary or validation of any part of the architecture. Each room was uniquely designed for his collection, and the photographs in the publication told this story.

The design was very Hollywood; a wonderful, invented, and stylish lifestyle. The piece has nothing to do with any historic perspective of the house.

Our second project at 1001 Roxbury was for Lisa and Josh Greer in 2011. They loved the site, location, and overall layout of the house. The Greers had a young family, which had quite different programmatic needs, as well as a different sense of style and taste. They wanted a wonderful, comfortable home for their family, so we removed all the previously styled rooms and interiors, which were seen in the LUXE publication, to create a calm, warm, welcoming, elegant set of interior rooms.

The Greers entertained and sponsored many non-profit events, so the house was finished and furnished in ways to support these large gatherings, while still making a great family home. Most of the prior remodel of the exterior was retained, however the interior spaces were completely reconceived for this new client and their family.

I’m very fortunate to have had the opportunity to work with two amazing clients to make 1001 Roxbury their unique home. Both were exciting commissions, of which I am very proud. But I reinforce the fluidity of residential design and the importance of each owner making their home their own. This house was never a result of an overall architectural idea and consistent design, but it has become a perfect example of the evolutionary nature of a house, especially in the environment of Beverly Hills/Los Angeles, much like a movie set that sets that tone for a production.

I’d like to make a few more comments to consider in this conversation. I fully support the city’s urban design guidelines for this neighborhood, which I believe are the key factors which give this house, other homes, and the overall neighborhood its sense of value and character. Open front yards, the position of the house on the street, the avoidance of high hedges, the limited heights of fences, the limited amount of hardscape all SIGNIFICANTLY contribute to the character of Beverly Hills. These planning ideas should be celebrated and protected, because I believe it’s what give the neighborhood its “historic significance,” not the individual houses. If a specific house remains, gets remodeled or replaced, it doesn’t matter to be honest. What’s important is the character of the neighborhood which creates the important feel and personality of this part of Beverly Hills. I applaud the Beverly Hills Architectural Review board for all their time and effort to protect and improve your community. Their hard work, and your work from the Planning/Development departments is evident – and it pays off.

In conclusion, I absolutely support the designation and protection of valuable Architectural historical assets within the City of Beverly Hills, but 1001 Roxbury is not one of them.

Its evolution over time is like many houses in the neighborhood – a reflection of its owners, their desires and dreams to make it their unique, curated home. I’m not worried about the potential replacement over time of this or many houses in the neighborhood, which have conventionally evolved as nonspecific architectural homes, as I believe the current neighborhood and urban guidelines will always protect this unique, important, and characteristically “Beverly Hills” neighborhood.

Sincerely,
Mark Rios

FAIA, FASLA
Creative Director
323-785-1812
[email protected]
George J. Mihlsten
Direct Dial: (213) 891-8196
[email protected]
US-DOCS\132655637.3
355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 100
Los Angeles, California 90071-1560
Tel: +1.213.485.1234 Fax: +1.213.891.8763
www.lw.com

FIRM / AFFILIATE OFFICES
Austin Moscow
Beijing Munich
Boston New York
Brussels Orange County
Century City Paris
Chicago Riyadh
Dubai San Diego
Düsseldorf San Francisco
Frankfurt Seoul
Hamburg Shanghai
Hong Kong Silicon Valley
Houston Singapore
London Tel Aviv
Los Angeles Tokyo
Madrid Washington, D.C.

Milan
June 14, 2022

VIA EMAIL
Laurence Wiener, Esq.

City Attorney, City of Beverly Hills
350 S. Grand Avenue, 37th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
Email: [email protected]
Re: 1001 N. Roxbury; June 21, 2022, City Council Hearing re Certificate of Ineligibility
Dear Larry:

We are writing to follow-up on our prior correspondence and discussions with you regarding the City Council’s review of the Certificate of Ineligibility for the home at 1001 N.

Roxbury that was deemed issued under Municipal Code section 10-3-3221.

The City Council has no jurisdiction to review the Certificate of Ineligibility because the house has been deemed ineligible for consideration under the City’s Historic Preservation Ordinance for seven years as a matter of law. Any other interpretation flies in the face of the ordinance’s plain text and improperly turns a legal mandate into a nullity.

The Code’s plain language is very clear. “If the director fails to prepare and serve a preliminary evaluation…within the allotted thirty (30) days, such failure will be deemed a finding of ineligibility.” (BHMC, § 10-3-3221.B.) The Community Development Director failed to issue a preliminary evaluation within 30 days of the application being deemed complete.

Therefore, the property was deemed ineligible as a matter of law.

There is no “decision” for the City Council to review.

A. The Property Was Deemed Ineligible As a Matter of Law.

The Bakers applied for a Certificate of Ineligibility on November 14, 2021. Section 10- 3-3221.B requires that “within thirty (30) days after the filing of the application, the director shall review the application materials and determine whether the application is complete or whether additional information is required. If the application is deemed incomplete, the director shall promptly inform the applicant in writing of the missing information.” The Planning Director did not inform the applicant within 30 days, or ever, that additional information was June 14, 2022

Page 2 ends

required or that the application was incomplete. Therefore, the application was complete on or before December 25, 2021.

A complete timeline of relevant events and supporting documents is attached as Exhibit

1. We understand that the City agrees with this timeline and agrees that a “preliminary evaluation” did not issue within the Code’s 30-day period.

Specifically, the Code requires “within thirty (30) days after the application is deemed complete, the Director shall prepare and serve on the property owner by first class, prepaid mail a written preliminary evaluation stating whether or not the director finds the subject property to be an eligible property.” Here, the Code required that the Director serve a written preliminary evaluation on the property owner by first class, prepaid mail no later than January 24, 2022, “stating whether or not the director finds the subject property to be an eligible property.” This was not done. The Director did not provide a preliminary evaluation in accordance with the Code. We understand that the City agrees the Director did not serve the written evaluation on the property owner by January 24, 2022. In fact, the Director never prepared or served the preliminary evaluation.

The Code is very specific regarding what happens when the required preliminary evaluation is not served within 30 days of the application being deemed complete—the property is deemed exempt from the Ordinance. “If the director fails to prepare and serve a preliminary evaluation regarding the subject property within the allotted thirty (30) days, such failure will be deemed a finding of ineligibility….” As no preliminary evaluation was served, the house at 1001 N. Roxbury Drive is exempt from the Ordinance by operation of law as of January 24, 2022 (at the latest), for a period of seven years.

Under the Code, the Director’s failure to issue the preliminary evaluation within 30 days rendered the certificate’s issuance mandatory. “Statutory provisions relating to time generally will be construed as mandatory where consequences or penalties are attached to the failure to observe the provision within a given time.” (Tran v. County of Los Angeles (2022) 74 Cal.App.5th 154, 166.) The Code has clear consequences for the Director’s failure to meet the 30-day limitation—the property is deemed ineligible as a matter of law. The certificate of ineligibility’s issuance was mandatory. The Director and the City had no discretion after failing to meet the statutory time requirement.

The Director did not make a “decision.” Rather, the finding was made by operation of law. The certificate’s issuance was required as a matter of law. It was mandatory. The City Council cannot undo this mandatory action.

1. The City Understood that a Deemed Ineligible Finding Was Final When the City Adopted Section 10-3-3221.

A colloquy between Mayor Bosse (then Councilwoman Bosse) and Cultural Heritage Commissioner Craig Corman at the June 16, 2015, City Council hearing on the then proposed modifications to the Ordinance confirms that the failure to issue a preliminary evaluation within 30 days automatically deems the property ineligible for a period of seven years.

June 14, 2022

Page 3 ends

Specifically, after reading the relevant portion of Section 3-3-3221, Mayor Bosse asked Commissioner Craig Corman, “does that mean basically that after 30 days if the Director does not give a certificate it’s done?” Commissioner Corman immediately responded, “that’s correct.”
This was repeated. Mayor Bosse: “If the director fails to prepare the evaluation within 30 days, such a failure will be deemed a finding of ineligibility.” Commissioner Corman:
“Yes.”
In concluding her comments on the Certificate of Ineligibility’s procedures, Mayor Bosse further noted that “one of our goals was to have predictability and for people to know in a reasonable time if their house is or is not potential landmark, so that is what that deals with.”1 The Los Angeles Conservancy also identified this 30-day feature of the City’s Ordinance and objected to it. The Conservancy argued that the City should amend the draft Ordinance so “a failure to act on the application should not automatically result in such a finding” of ineligibility.

The City rejected the Conservancy’s proposed amendment and adopted the Ordinance unchanged.2
In fact, the “deemed ineligible” consequence is in sharp contrast to the procedure under 10-3-3215 for designating landmarks. Section 10-3-3215 was drafted with a “get out of jail free card,” per Mayor Bosse, such that if the City did not act within the time periods set forth in that section, the City “shall automatically receive a fourteen (14) day extension of time in which to act.” The Code offers no such provision with respect to certificates of ineligibility.

If the Director does not act within 30 days, the property is deemed ineligible. Period.

There is no “get out of jail free card.” The Council has no authority to review.

B. There Is No “Decision” for City Council to Review.

The City Council only has a very limited right to review lower level “decisions” under Municipal Code Section 1-4-201. Specifically, “the Council may order a review of any decision made by any commission, board, or official of the City, except as otherwise provided in this Code.” Because the Director’s failure to act was “deemed a finding of ineligibility” as a matter of law, there is no “decision” for the Council to “order review of.” The Council’s discussion on March 15, 2022, and its action April 12, 2022, purporting to order review of the Code’s legal exemption mandate is void and of no force and effect.

It is manifest that the Code’s deemed finding is not a “discretionary decision.” Case law is in accord. “A failure to comply with duties allegedly imposed by law is neither an ‘action’ nor 1 This discussion begins at approximately 2:53:45 of the video of City Council’s June 16, 2015, meeting, which is linked above and incorporated in full by this reference. (Excerpt of above discussion attached at Exhibit 2; complete transcript of June 16, 2015, City Council hearing attached at Exhibit 3.)
2 See May 28, 2015 Los Angeles Conservancy Letter, at p. 6 (Exhibit 4).

June 14, 2022

Page 4 ends

a ‘decision’….” (Urban Habitat Program v. City of Pleasonton (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 1561, 1578.) The Director’s failure to act within the required time period resulted in the property being deemed ineligible as a matter of law. That is not a “decision” subject to the Council’s review.

There is no decision for the Council to review.

Section 1-4-202 further supports the fact that the Council has no right of review of a legally mandated Code finding. Addressing noticing for hearings following the adoption of an order to review a “decision,” the Code requires mailed notice to the applicant and persons “who appeared and addressed the board, commission, or official at the previous hearing on the matter.” Of course, here, there was not “previous hearing on the matter.” Here, there was no hearing.

The action the Council is attempting to review is not a decision at all. As the Code makes clear, the failure to issue the preliminary determination is expressly “deemed a finding of ineligibility…” Just as the Council could not review the “deemed complete” determination made as a matter of law, the Council cannot review the deemed ineligibility as a matter of law.

The Council’s review right is not plenary. It is specifically limited to “decisions.” There is no “decision” to review here.

C. The Council’s Time to Review the Ministerial Action Has Long Since Passed.

Moreover, even if the Code’s express language regarding a “deemed finding of ineligibility” were a “decision” subject to review, which it is not, the time period for the City Council to review the exemption had long since passed by time Councilmember Mirisch agendized the item for discussion on March 15.

At the latest, the property was deemed ineligible under the Code on January 24, 2022.

Even if Section 1-4-201 were applicable, Council “review may be ordered by motion of the Council duly adopted within thirty (30) calendar days after the issuance of the decision.” (Section 1-4-201.) Thirty (30) days after January 24, 2022, was February 23, 2022. No consideration of the matter (and certainly no action) by the Council was taken prior to February 23, 2022. The Council did not first entertain a motion to call the ministerial action up until March 15, 2022. Therefore, as a matter of law, Council had lost the opportunity to review the matter as of February 24.

Further, even if the Council could review the Director’s ministerial action issuing the requested certificate under by 10-3-3221.B, which it cannot, such review would be limited to whether the Director did or did not issued the preliminary evaluation within the required 30-day period. Here, there is no dispute that the Director did not issue the preliminary evaluation within 30 days of the application being deemed complete. Therefore, if the Council reviews what the Director did (or did not do) the Council must confirm the Director’s ministerial issuance of the certificate of ineligibility. The Council has no jurisdiction to review whether the certificate of ineligibility meets the standards under the Cultural Heritage Ordinance * * * *
For all of these reasons, the City Council’s purported actions on March 15, 2022 and April 12, 2022, are and were a nullity. The Council had no jurisdiction to review the legal (i.e., June 14, 2022

Page 5 ends

Code) determination that the house is exempt from the provisions of the City’s Historic Preservation Ordinance for a period of seven years from January 24, 2022 (at the latest).

Very truly yours,
George J. Mihlsten
of LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Attachments
cc: Honorable Mayor, Vice Mayor, City Councilmembers
Mr. Ryan Gohlich, Director of Community Development
Mr. Mark Odell, Urban Designer
Exhibit Index
Ex. Document
1 Certificate of Ineligibility Application Timeline
Tab A: ESA Report and Certificate of Ineligibility Application sent to City and downloaded by City (Nov. 19, 2021
Tab B: Email form Mark Odell to Murray and ESA (Nov. 23, 2021) Tab C: Certificate of Ineligibility (Nov. 24, 2021)
Tab D: Email from City to applicant stating that fee is due (Nov. 24, 2021 Tab E: Mark Odell email to Murray Fischer again stating that the application and ESA Report had been forwarded to the City’s consultant for peer review (Dec. 13, 2021
Tab F: Application deemed complete 30 days from payment of fee (Dec. 25, 2021
Tab G: Ostashay & Associates Peer Review Assessment (Jan. 12, 2022) Tab H: 10-3-3221(B) (Jan. 24, 2022)
Tab I: City memo advising Cultural Heritage Commission of Certificate of Ineligibility Application and ESA’s and City’s peer reviewer’s conclusions (Feb. 1, 2022)
2 Excerpt from the City Council’s June 16, 2019 Meeting 3 Complete transcript of June 16, 2015, City Council hearing 4 Los Angeles Conservancy Letter (May 28, 2015)
EXHIBIT 1
1 US-DOCS\131710860
1001 N. Roxbury Drive
Certificate of Ineligibility Application Timeline
Date Action/Event/Deadline Supporting Document(s)
November 19, 2021
ESA Report and Certificate of Ineligibility Application sent to City and downloaded by City Tab A
November 23, 2021
Email form Mark Odell to Murray and ESA confirming “We have received the assessment and application and have forwarded to Jan Ostashay for further evaluation and consideration. Reina will forward to your team a link for payment of the fee. Once the application is uploaded and the fee is paid, then the 30-day review period can commence, although the documents have already been sent for peer review and I have conducted a cursory review of the submittal in advance.”
Tab B
November 24, 2021
City deems Certificate of Ineligibility “Applied” for in City system Tab C November 24, 2021
Email from City to applicant stating that fee is due. Further states “You application is currently under review and as a next step, you will be notified if any comments are needed to be addressed in the report or if the application is complete.” Tab D
2 US-DOCS\131710860
Date Action/Event/Deadline Supporting Document(s)
November 25, 2021
Fee paid
Tab C
December 13, 2021
Mark Odell email to Murray Fischer again stating that the application and ESA Report had been forwarded to the City’s consultant for peer review Tab E
December 25, 2021
Application deemed complete 30 days from payment of fee. No requests from City for additional information prior to December 25.

Tab F
January 12, 2022
Jan Ostashay circulates peer review assessment concurring with the ESA Report’s conclusion that the residence does not satisfy the criteria for local landmark designation Tab G
January 24, 2022
Deadline to issue “preliminary evaluation.” No “preliminary evaluation” issued. Failure to issue a preliminary evaluation “will be deemed a finding of ineligibility, and the director shall issue the requested certificate of ineligibility without further delay.” 10-3-3221(B).

Tab H
3 US-DOCS\131710860
Date Action/Event/Deadline Supporting Document(s)
February 1, 2022
City memo advising Cultural Heritage Commission of Certificate of Ineligibility Application and ESA’s and City’s peer reviewer’s conclusions Tab I
February 23, 2022
30 days after “preliminary evaluation” required to issue and deadline for City Council to call up “decisions” under Code section 10-4-201.

March 2, 2022
Notice of Decision of Certificate of Ineligibility Issued, dated March 2, 2022.

March 15, 2022
City Council holds hearing on whether to review deemed issued Certificate of Ineligibility. 4 US-DOCS\131710860
Date Action/Event/Deadline Supporting Document(s)
April 12, 2022
City Council votes to review deemed issued Certificate of Ineligibility.

TAB A
1 Hanelin, Benjamin (LA)
From: Alison Garcia Kellar <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2021 2:55 PM
To: Mark Odell; Reina Kapadia; Murray Fischer
Cc: 'Suzanne Shepela'; 'Robert Adler'; Margarita Jerabek Subject: FW: 1001 N. Roxbury Drive HRA and Certificate of Ineligibility sent successfully to [email protected] and 2 others
Hello Mark and Reina,
We have shared the 1001 N. Roxbury Drive HRA and Certificate of Ineligibility documents with you via WeTransfer.

Please confirm receipt when you have a chance.

Thank you and have a nice weekend.

Kindly,
Alison
Alison Garcia Kellar
Senior Architectural Historian
ESA | Environmental Science Associates
Celebrating 50 Years of Work that Matters!
550 West C Street, Suite 750
San Diego, CA 92101
954.732.8931 mobile, currently working from home
[email protected] | esassoc.com
Follow us on LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | Vimeo From: WeTransfer <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2021 2:46 PM
To: Alison Garcia Kellar <[email protected]>
Subject: 1001 N. Roxbury Drive HRA and Certificate of Ineligibility sent successfully to [email protected] and 2 others
Thanks for
using
WeTransfer!
Your files
were sent
successfully.
1001 N. Roxbury Drive HRA
and Certificate of Ineligibility
sent to
2 [email protected]
and 2 others
2 items, 24.2 MB in total ・ Expires on 26 November, 2021 Thanks for using WeTransfer. We'll email you a confirmation as soon as your files have been downloaded.

Recipients
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected]
Download link
https://we.tl/t-n3mDSZbyp0
2 items
1001 N. Roxbury Drive HRA_Draft.pdf

22.3 MB
Certificate of Ineligibilty.pdf

1.96 MB
Message
Hello Mark and Reina,
Please find the link to download the 1001 N. Roxbury Drive HRA and Certificate of Ineligibility here. We will follow up with an email to confirm receipt.

Kindly, Alison Garcia Kellar, ESA
3 To make sure our emails arrive, please add [email protected] to your contacts.

Get more out of WeTransfer, get Pro
About WeTransfer ・ Help ・ Legal ・ Report this transfer as spam

1 Hanelin, Benjamin (LA)
From: WeTransfer <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2021 2:46 PM
To: Alison Garcia Kellar
Subject: 1001 N. Roxbury Drive HRA and Certificate of Ineligibility sent successfully to [email protected] and 2 others
1001 N. Roxbury Drive HRA
and Certificate of Ineligibility
sent to
[email protected]
and 2 others
2 items, 24.2 MB in total ・ Expires on 26 November, 2021 Thanks for using WeTransfer. We'll email you a confirmation as soon as your files have been downloaded.

Recipients
[email protected] [email protected]
[email protected]
Download link
https://we.tl/t-n3mDSZbyp0
2 items
1001 N. Roxbury Drive HRA_Draft.pdf
2 22.3 MB
Certificate of Ineligibilty.pdf

1.96 MB
Message
Hello Mark and Reina,
Please find the link to download the 1001 N. Roxbury Drive HRA and Certificate of Ineligibility here. We will follow up with an email to confirm receipt.

Kindly, Alison Garcia Kellar, ESA
To make sure our emails arrive, please add [email protected] to your contacts.

Get more out of WeTransfer, get Pro
About WeTransfer ・ Help ・ Legal ・ Report this transfer as spam 1 Hanelin, Benjamin (LA)
From: WeTransfer <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2021 2:46 PM
To: Alison Garcia Kellar
Subject: [email protected] downloaded 1001 N. Roxbury Drive HRA and Certificate of Ineligibility
[email protected]
downloaded 1001 N. Roxbury Drive
HRA and Certificate of Ineligibility
2 items, 24.2 MB in total ・ Expires on 26 November, 2021 Download link
https://we.tl/t-n3mDSZbyp0
2 items
1001 N. Roxbury Drive HRA_Draft.pdf

22.3 MB
Certificate of Ineligibilty.pdf

1.96 MB
Message
Hello Mark and Reina,
Please find the link to download the 1001 N. Roxbury Drive HRA and Certificate of Ineligibility here. We will follow up with an email to 2 confirm receipt.

Kindly, Alison Garcia Kellar, ESA
To make sure our emails arrive, please add [email protected] to your contacts.

Get more out of WeTransfer, get Pro
About WeTransfer ・ Help ・ Legal
TAB B
1 Hanelin, Benjamin (LA)
From: Mark Odell <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2021 3:23 PM
To: Murray Fischer; Reina Kapadia
Cc: Alison Garcia Kellar; Margarita Jerabek
Subject: Re: 1001 Roxbury Dr.

Mr. Fischer, We have received the assessment and application and have forwarded to Jan Ostashay for further evaluation and consideration. Reina will forward to your team a link for payment of the fee. Once the application is uploaded and the fee is paid, then the 30-day review period can commence, although the documents have already been sent for peer review and I have conducted a cursory review of the submittal in advance.

Thank you and please let me know if you have any further questions.

Mark Odell,
Urban Designer
Community Development
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
(310) 285-1116 (Direct)
[email protected]
From: Murray Fischer <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2021 2:52 PM
To: Reina Kapadia; Mark Odell
Subject: 1001 Roxbury Dr.

CAUTION: External Sender
Use caution when clicking links or opening attachments
Reina and Mark , following up on the application for certificate of ineligibility.

Last week Alison Garcia Keller on my behalf filed an application for a certificate of ineligibility.

I got confirmation from ESA Associates that it was filed. However I haven’t received confirmation from either of you as to your receipt of both the application and the report. So I ask you for same. Also please indicate when the 30 day period is starting. According to the application it seems to start on the day of filing.

Happy thanksgiving.
2 murray

310-276-3600
Law Offices of Murray D. Fischer
433 N. Camden Drive, Suite 970
Beverly Hills, CA 90210

This e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein, and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail, and permanently delete this e-mail, and any copies or printouts.

The City keeps a copy of all E-mails sent and received for a minimum of 2 years. All retained E-mails will be treated as a Public Record per the California Public Records Act, and may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the terms, and subject to the exemptions, of that Act.

TAB C

Page 1 of 2 ends

Approved

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT

PLANNING
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Permit No: PL2100397
Permit Status: Approved
03/03/2022
Certificate of Ineligibility
Job Address: 1001 N ROXBURY DR
Beverly Hills, CA
Project Number: 387837 Applied 11/24/2021
Activity Type: Certificate of Ineligibility Issued: 03/02/2022 Project Name: HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW Completed: 03/02/2022 Parcel Number: To Expire: 03/01/2029
Job Description: Review for in/eligibility of a possible historic resource designed by Master Architect Carleton Burgess.

PEOPLE
Type Name
Address
Phone
License
Applicant Murray D. Fischer Law Offices of Murray D. Fischer 433 N. Camden Drive, Suite 970
(310) 276-3600

Other Margarita Jerabek-Bray
626 Wilshire Blvd #1100
(310) 566-8012

NOTES
Date Note
02/10/2022 PAID $3,978 OSTASHAY & ASSOCIATES INVOICE #001-2202

FINANCE
GROUP Activity Review Paid Balance
PL-Certificate of Ineligibility $556.89 $0.00 $556.89 $0.00 TOTAL $556.89 $0.00 $556.89 $0.00

TRANSACTIONS

Page 2 of 2 ends

Approved
ID Date Method Amount Paid By
821992 11/25/2021
11:38:49 AM
CREDIT
CARD $4,534.89 Murray D. Fischer Law Offices of Murray D.Fischer ([email protected]) 824880 02/10/2022
9:32:51 AM
ADJUST
NON REV ($3,978.00) Murray D. Fischer Law Offices of Murray D.Fischer ([email protected])

PERMIT CONDITIONS
Date Condition
TAB D
1 Hanelin, Benjamin (LA)
From: Reina Kapadia <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 1:57 PM
To: 'Murray Fischer'; Mark Odell
Cc: Alison Garcia Kellar; Margarita Jerabek
Subject: RE: 1001 Roxbury Dr.

Attachments: Roxbury Dr N, 1001 - C of I invoice.pdf
Dear Applicant(s):

Thank you for your submittal of an application for a Certificate of Ineligibility at 1001 Roxbury Drive. Your report has been initially reviewed and since it will require peer review by the City’s historic consultant, the project will be assessed the Tier II Certificate of Ineligibility fee. The invoice in the amount of $4534.89 is attached for your use. The email addresses added to login for the project (from your application) include: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected].

Instructions on how to complete the online payment can be found here: http://www.beverlyhills.org/departments/communitydevelopment/developmentservices/onlinepermitservices/ For assistance with making the payment online, please call (310) 285-1141 during business hours.

You application is currently under review and as a next step, you will be notified if any comments are needed to be addressed in the report or if the application is complete.

Thank you,
Reina Kapadia, AICP
Associate Planner
(310) 285-1129
[email protected]
City of Beverly Hills
Community Development Department
455 N. Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
www.beverlyhills.org/preservation
Master Architect List
COVID-19 UPDATE:

As of May 3, 2021, Beverly Hills City Hall has reopened to the public for select services on an appointment-basis. For your convenience, virtual services are still being offered at beverlyhills.org. To make an in-person appointment for select City services, please visit beverlyhills.org/appointments or call 310-285-1141.

Design Review, Architectural Review, and Historic Preservation Planning services will continue to be offered virtually only at this time. For a virtual appointment with me, please email me a request for a meeting time.

The City of Beverly Hills remains committed to the health and safety of its employees, residents and visitors. Face Covering Requirements in Beverly Hills
From: Murray Fischer <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2021 4:24 PM
To: Mark Odell <[email protected]>; Reina Kapadia <[email protected]> 2 Cc: 'Alison Garcia Kellar' <[email protected]>; 'Margarita Jerabek' <[email protected]> Subject: RE: 1001 Roxbury Dr.

CAUTION: External Sender
Use caution when clicking links or opening attachments
Thank you and have a Happy Thanksgiving.
murray
310-276-3600
Law Offices of Murray D. Fischer
433 N. Camden Drive, Suite 970
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
This e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein, and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail, and permanently delete this e-mail, and any copies or printouts.

From: Mark Odell [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2021 3:23 PM
To: Murray Fischer; Reina Kapadia
Cc: Alison Garcia Kellar; Margarita Jerabek
Subject: Re: 1001 Roxbury Dr.

Thank you and please let me know if you have any further questions.

Mark Odell,
Urban Designer
Community Development
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
(310) 285-1116 (Direct)
[email protected]
3 From: Murray Fischer <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2021 2:52 PM
To: Reina Kapadia; Mark Odell
Subject: 1001 Roxbury Dr.

CAUTION: External Sender
Use caution when clicking links or opening attachments
Reina and Mark , following up on the application for certificate of ineligibility.

Last week Alison Garcia Keller on my behalf filed an application for a certificate of ineligibility.

Happy thanksgiving.
murray

310-276-3600
Law Offices of Murray D. Fischer
433 N. Camden Drive, Suite 970
Beverly Hills, CA 90210

TAB E
1 Hanelin, Benjamin (LA)
Subject: FW: certificates of Ineligibility
From: Mark Odell [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 4:42 PM
To: Murray Fischer; Reina Kapadia
Cc: 'William Wright'; 'Suzanne Shepela'
Subject: Re: certificates of Ineligibility

Mr. Fischer, On December 4th I had responded to your regarding the property on Foothill and after the fees were paid on this property -- the application was circulated to the Cultural Heritage Commission. This will take approximately 30 days and then the director can sign the certificate. It will also be circulated to Council at that time.

For the property on Roxbury, The application and report have been forwarded to the City's Historical Consultant for her evaluation and peer review of the assessment. We have not received her report back at this time. We will let you know of any issues she raises after review and then the application can be circulated to the Commission and then the Council, along with the consultants review.

Thank you and please reach out to me with any further questions you may have. As we have discussed in the past, the total review period for these types of projects is approximately 90-days, or sooner. We also try to move them forward as quickly as possible.

Best,
Mark Odell, Urban Designer
Community Development
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
(310) 285-1116 (Direct)
[email protected]
From: Murray Fischer <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 2:33 PM
To: Reina Kapadia; Mark Odell
Cc: 'William Wright'; 'Suzanne Shepela'
Subject: certificates of Ineligibility
CAUTION: External Sender
Use caution when clicking links or opening attachments
Reina r u working, I have sent you recently emails inquiring about 2 addresses in particular

1. 814n. Foothill and 22. 1001 N. Roxbury.
2 Could u please give me the status on each and when the initial 30 days started.

Thank u the owners are inquiring and I am obligated to communicate and get back to them pursuant to the professional rules of conduct under the State Bar of California
Have a great day.
murray
310-276-3600
Law Offices of Murray D. Fischer
433 N. Camden Drive, Suite 970
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
This e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein, and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail, and permanently delete this e-mail, and any copies or printouts.

TAB F

! "#"!
!$"# %&

! "#"!
!$"# %&
'()*+,-./01*2)3(*+4(-2-(5')*36 789.9./87:)*),-:
;

#<&%&

=>?@AB>CDBE?EBFG@>AHABI>HGHCEAJ@=EC>@KAJLEFEBMK =>MM?NOP P"$$Q R
789.9./8/:S-T*6*)*362:

$%&% &

V

&&
VW#

XXY;YPZ
&W&&&&$

$#
&

[;\]
;YPZ
&W
W $
&
&
#
&

W
V&
$$
&

$&&$

$
W

&
&
&

&$
&
&
W&%#
&&

&
&
&W&
&&&

]_`Y;\_;
&%
& &

&&W
&
^

&%

V
$
&&&

$&

&&

% &

$&<&

&& &&&$#
&;

a

a
&
&W
&

$&
$

&
bcY[XYZd

&W

&W$$

&
V
W

#&

&

&&
&W

&
ab
&aW#

$

W& $
&
&W

&

& ^

& #&
_
[YUP]ZY
\ZeY]PZ
\Z;
[fc
[Y;g
_;O_\f
R_
VWh
#]
_
&QQQ

&

i

$_$&_\f

&_$&_ $]

& QQQ

& $

_\];YUY_
;\PU
hh]Ph]Y
;\Z\ii

$

V

&

&&

&
V
&&%
&

&$ &
& <
W%

&

_\];YUY_
;\PU\_PZP
Y_`
]Xi`Yh

$

j&%< # &&&W&

$
$
&#
$$& &$&

&

_\];YUY_
;\PUYZ\[YdYbY[Y;g

$

#
&

W&
&#
W&

$
$

V&$

_`
]
_;\]X\UYZYZdU\
;c]\
&&

&
V

W

$

W

&
#

&$&
W

W

&

&$&i

$

W
&
#

&

#
&
&^
&O
#&& #W
%& %R&&O %& %&
R
&

&
$

$
&
&

& && &
&

_Y;gPUb\e\][g`Y[[i]\dYi;\]PU`Yi;P]Y_h]Ph\];Y\i
&
&&

&
$W &
#W

W
&& <

&

;

&
&
#

&
%

&

;

&
V&$

#
#
&

Wk$$%#
& W$

#V#$V%&

W<k$$
_P

YiiYPZ;

& $& &
&Q!!Q
$

_PZ;]Ybc;YZdh]Ph\];g

W&
&#
&

#^
&

$&&
$

&
#

&$&$

&
$$

&
$ &
&
&

X\
P[Y;YPZP]X\
P[Yi`
&W

W
W&
&%

&

$&&$

W
WV & &&
#

! "#"!
!$"# %&

! "#"!
!$"# %&
'

(
&((
(
&
#

$
&
%&
)&*&+&
)&&%,

&
&
$
&

-./01'2/'

)3
$
&
) *&

01242
.15
/-65.7'
&#
)$
)%&
,$#&$
$

) *
$&

)&

&
$
$

08.9.:807/270/';

)$%

$* &

$& &

&
$ &
&& ,
&

&#

0<107'.24
8=2/>
,#)
$

#&&+

#)#$

&
)

%,3
&

)

*#&

&
#)

&$

$%&?
%

#@
$@

% A#?
%

#
&
*)
B&
@

&
& ?&

)
&&
&

3A?
%
#
&
*)

)
&

%B?

#
&B#,

+&
$
$

*#

##)&&

&
*?

#),&%
&

$ $

#
& *#

#)&
&$& %

&)&#

&$
&
&

#
&
)

%,
&

&

%

&
5.6'2/.1
66066
04'/072/'

&*
#)

$

*
&
&

&

&
$
)

)#
$
$

&
$ &
&& ,

'

&
&
&)

$& &#

,&%&$
&

&

#)$

$& &

5.6'2/.1-.6'/.1'2/-.6'/.1'

*&&$&
&&

&&,
&
&

)$
#
&

#@

$&&$

&

)

)
#)&
) *&

#& &

&

&
&

5.6'2/.17/270/';

)

#& &
& ,&
#

&
)

&

&
&

.124.17/270/';

)

#&*
&

$
&#) &
& *

)

#&
#)
%

:*)5&

& $
$

)3 &

)

%

.4'09/.';'
#
)$
)
&*)

&$&

& &

&

%,&
$&*&

&&

$&&$

.4C04'2/;2D08.9.:807/270/'.06

&
& #)

)

&
&

*) $

&$&&
& #)

&
##
.&
&
& &
&&

&*&
)
*)$& *

$*
)#&

&
&)&$
&#
&

#)
# & &%

$&
& '

&

*&$

&*&
)
#
#
&

)3$$%#
& )$

#*#$
*%&

),3$$
8 4-

/>
&)
)&
&&)#
&

#@
& &&

#& &
& ,

&

&
&

.&
&&)&
$& ,

%
)&#

&

#
%

#%
)&*
&
&#

&

##)

&

& #&,)#&
&

)3& , &
&

8.6'2D821
8

6'0/
/15.'01'6

&
& #)

)

&

$& &

%

* &
&

)'

&
*&$

#

#
&

)3$$%#
& )$

#*#$*%&

),3$$
821
8.4C04'2/;'
&*&
)$#

! "#"!
!$"# %&

! "#"!
!$"# %& !
'()
'*+,-./+*(01-./(*-)2*(2+*/-+.(*'()
'*+,-./+*/

3$4531
$

-6/+6
6)+
67*+2
-*. $&
&$( &3
&
&&
& *

8(*
*)1-/+)/9*
'
:
*7
&% 5&&&
3#3&

5# 3&

$ $

& 5

3 &3$
&

$&&

&$
#
&$$
$

./+*
*)1-/+)/
&

$% 3&<
&&

$ $

%
& 5

&
&$
&

-''.
)//
)$&,5&&
)
& ==

& $

6 /-(6
'*+,-./+*(01-./(*-)2'
)+./
$$
$

#
&

&
#;
&$&
&
&

3

%

&
& #3

&

&

$! &

&
&

5
&
$""& >"9.)
=

!")0*
&"="!?
6 /9*
'0+
/9*+
&3&

3
&
&
&

&
3

$

6(
-6
/+72*(2+*/@

3

#&&&
#3

&$
&&

& A&
#

&
3
6(6)(6/*-49/-6,2*(2+*/@

3%

& &

&
&
#

&

3
(48+)//

B#;
B

&

$#
&&

3

&&

53&& $&

&

3##3
&

&5#&#;

%

&&5&&
0
&
&&

$#;

(*7-6
*@

-6/+6
6)+
67*+2
-*
&3%A

#
&
#
&=!
!4$

(:6+*
&3&>?
&
&
$
&
#&

3 &
$

&&3
30
$

%&
$
&&
&

5
$&
&
&
$
&
#&

3%

%&
#&
&
3
5 &

%&
%&&

&
$

&
3$'
&
#

#

%&
2+*-(7(0.-,6-0-)
6)+/
&$

$&&$

$3
$ &
&& A

2+*.(6(0,*+
/-
2(*/
6)+
&%

5

#
&

&

&
&%

&# &

3
& ;
&

&
&$

&&%
&&
%% 3A&%&

&

$
& %
% $&
&

&
3
&
&
#&

#$

&#35

$

&

&

&
3&
2+*.(6(0,*+
/'()
'2*(
-6+6)+
&%

5

#
&

&

3$4531

#

#A&

3%& $

2*+'-
-6
*@+C
'9
/-(6
&5

&#3

&

3

&
&

&5&
3&#
3
2*+.+*C
/-(6/

$3&
&3

&

&$&

3
&
$
3
2*(2+*/@/
&

3$
&
&

#
&

& &#;
&

3

$

&
2*(2+*/@(0+D/*
(*7-6
*@.-,6-0-)
6)+

3
5&

3
&3&$&&

$ $

& #5

&
& &

$& &B)
)&
&,

! "#"!
!$"# %&

! "#"!
!$"# %&
'
(

)*

* +&$&,

&(
-
.$
/01&

12
&3
4

&)%
(
/(
2
&3
5
.6*

&1
'37'63(0,8()82
)8+(738598+(385(3$
#

&
#

&
& &&&
#

&

&

:;
-8.869)8+(7385'36+63<
(872572+;-(
2(
&

&

&
=
$&

$
&
& $& &!"5.3"

36572+(3;5(872(

$
&#/&%&

&

$&
$
#
&

#>
& &

$

$ $

&
&
36)
48-8(
(872
&/
$?&
#
$
/

&
&
&%
*&

&

$&&$

%

&*/

*

36-75
(872(

$*&
$
/$&

&

$$&

&&

36+(73
(872(

$

/$
#
&

$&
$
/&

&

$
#/&$

*$
%?#/

&
$
&%?
+6536(
307.()682(63873=++(
29 39+(
1+
/7$(
8&
=+
& .(

(
&
7$)
'
,

@
&.'*&3
#

&3
&
& 3&

&
)
4
&1$
&
!"5.3"!& $

+(
48-8A
(872(

$/&
&

#
%

#
/$&
&$

/%
&
&&

&
$

&

+(
(6)8+(7385
-4;8-982@5796'

$

5$&)

& +$
/5 &&%

& B&

& & $

+(3;5(;36(

1

1&
#

#
&&

$
&
&&

& $

&

&

&
*
/

*&
&&%
+;4+(
2(8
-82(6@38(08&

/

& #&
&*

&

&
&

&
&

%

*&
&

#

$%? &%

&
&
$

+;3<60
/

&
& C $ &
$/&&

&
&

/=
&

%

&#

&%

&/$
/&#
/

/#
&

&*&
/

=&/*

&$
//

$/

*/$

+
*//#&

#/&#
$$

/#/

*
&&

&
$
/%&D#

* *

*/

$

E7 7"
$$B D 7 "7
BB$$B"F
GHIJIJKHJLMNOPNOQRSTRUVPWNXWSOYUTMZWOMUNL
(
&
&
&
$

#
/
?&%
&& &

&
&
&
&&& *
&$

&&
&

&

*&
&
#

&
&
& &&

&$

/=

/(

& &

&
&

&
&
#$#

?&&

&
$&&$#
/&

$
/%&

=*&.

&
&
&
$

$
/& &%$#/

'

&

/&
&
%&&
&
& &$

*
&& &
&&$

/=

D
4.
&* & &$ &

/

&
&$

&

&
$

/&
&
D
56

&

4*/)=

! "#"!
!$"# %&

! "#"!
!$"# %&
'(
&

)*&)#)

&& &
&&

&
&

+
&

#)+&

&

#
&& &

),
--&
&&
)+
& .&

)*

#$$&&#&$
&
&&
+,
/
.&% &

+ #)%&$

)*

&$

+
&

&

)*&&,
0-&
&+
&&
+
$

#)%&
&

&%$
&
&& &

1$21

&
,
34 &
$)&$&&&

&&
+

&
&
&
%&
&
&
&

#

& +

56 6"$$7 8
9:;<;<=:>?@ABCDCEFG@FCHIJKCAILCDIE?
M

2
+& .
#)+#
&$

&&
& &
&
& +
&$

&

&
&

&)
#
&

56 6"$$7 8
9:;<;<=:N?OIGBCFGIPKCGIA?
Q

#
$&)
+
)

#)

&&
&

+
)

#&&
$&+&
&+

&

+&$

#
&&$
)%

+&
&+56 6"$$7 8
9:;<;<=:R?BCDCBKBB@CDFID@DSIGIPKCGIBIDFE?
-+)%&& +)&&&&
$

)

#&
&& .

)&

$&&$

& $& &

&
!&
$

#&
&

#T

+&

))
&)

+&
$

+&
#
&
&

&

&!7&
"$

56 6"$$7 8
9:;<;<=:U?SKLFKG@LVIGCF@JISWBBCEECWD?

-
#
&
6$X&M

#)
#

&M

&

+&

%& $

+
&
Y
&
&

& Z
$
&M
&
# $$+5 8#&
#)

)
&$%

# &
$

)
#$

&

+

&
$
&
&
$

M
&

+ &

&

&
&&.&% $

+
&M

&
$#& )#

%58$

&

#
$&%

$
&$
&$& &&
&

& #)

[(
)$

&
$$

&!"X/\
"M
$& &
&

)

)&&&

&

)$.

)

&&+
&& &

&

#&&&&

&+2
&

)

$&
+#&

&
)6$

$+5 8#

&

#

&
&

X$&

&
X\

& 6 M

)
&
&

$

& +
$

&
M
$

&

$$&
#

%&
&

&%

#
&
&
%

&#)%&

&*#)%

#.
&$&

$$$

).M
&
. $

& &
&
&
&&

).
#

)$

'(
)6$M
X&M

&&)$

&
) +&

&& &

)
%

#&
&

)# $

)
M

)

& &
&& . $

&&
&
&$

&$)&

& &

&&

)& &

! "#"!
!$"# %&

! "#"!
!$"# %& "

&'

(
&

&
#

&& &

%

&

#
&
#

)*

&'
&

$
+,
(-&

&&

&

/

&/
&

&&&(.&

'
&

#

& $

&
#

)

&
#&
&
& &%

0

1%&
'
&

&

.

(
& &

&&&&$ &

0

1%&

23

&

&4$'
5&
6
($

&

#&

&(
&
&

'
%&$
&

&
# #(

&
&&
#(6
(.
$

#&
& &

(& &'

&
#

&
75&

(-&8.&
0.%9
&

.%$6

&
&$ .&
&

&

&

&

#

:
.% .&
&

&

&$

6
&
&

(
&&(

$

.&
&

&
%

&&&&&%

&&&&
#

:
.% .&
&

&

&$

6
&
&

(&
&
&$

+4 4"$$; ,
<=>?>?@=ABCDEFGHIJKKLMNFHDOMPFQDRRNHHNDJB
S&

%$
&

&
#$%

)

(
$

%. &

T
1-&
&.

& & $ &
&#(

(
&& U&

& U&(&(
&

&
&&
&&
&

T
55

# & &
&

&& #& &

(T
85

# & &
&

$

T
)0.%&(
.(&

# & &
&

&.&
(T
25&

& .

&$
&U&

&
&$

U
&
&& &
&
$&
&$

&
& U&(&(
&

&
&&
&&
&

T
78. &$

#&

(#
.
&&
& &

(&
&

(
#& &

T
V0.%&

&
&$
$
$
&& &

& &
&&
&

(
&&

&$&$

$& #(5)3
&
&

(
&

&&&%

(W
5)3

&T
-0&

& & $

&

&
(
&(
&

T
X0.%& U&
&

(
&&

&

T
YZ. &
&

(
& &

:
&&
&$&&
.&
&
$$ &

&.

& & .
& &#

(
&

.
&$

&

(T
[Z

&
& &

#&$
&

&& &

.
&&

& .
#

&&
$

(W

.
&T
5 &
%

&
(

& $ .&&
&

(W

.
&T
\S&

(
&

&&&&.%& U&
&

&&&&&:&&& &&& &

.&

T

! "#"!
!$"# %&

! "#"!
!$"# %&

'()
#

& #
& &*

& &&
&&

#

&& )
&$

+
,-

&

&&$
&

&
&&
%.
&$&/+&
0,$&/

$
&
&

/# &
#/

&
&$

/
&1'
'"$$2 3
456767859:;<=>=<?@ABCDBDE=DAB?=>:

F

/
&/#/

&
#
)
&&&
)
&
%&
&

&
&)
#

& )

1' '"$$2 3
456767845:=>A@GHB>IJ=DACKAI=BD?=DAC<LCK=HBMBGH=;<C;=<AB=>:

F
&)&
/$#

#/
F
&
&
&

&)&
/&

&%

#

/#
&
&
/)%&
&

&)&
/
,

&

&)&
//#&&
$
&
&&

/N
$

$

1' '"$$
2 3
456767844:=>A@GHB>IJ=DACKAI=EBALCKG=?=<HLIBHH><=MB>A=<CKIB>AC<BE ;<C;=<AB=>:

F

/$O)/P
$

#/
,

&

/# &
$ &
%

&
.

/&
&&
&$
&#

$
&

#.
#/

/&
#)

&
&$
&&
$

$$$

)
&&

1' '"
$$2 3
456767848:H@DQJ@<RQ=>BMD@ABCDE<BA=<B@:

&#
//#&&
& &
& .$

$

&

$

#%

& .

$/$

$%&

&

S

$
/$)1 3/$
/$
&/&$&+
S

)
& #

&
)

$&

+
!S

&
#
&
&

/$
$&$&+&
S

&
&

)

&
/

&
&& .&#
& &/

& $

OS&
&

&

$

&
#
&
$

&& .

$/

$%&

&

S

&

&
&
$

+
S
&
&%.#/

+
!S
&
&%.

%%& &
#/&$

&& %

/&&

&

)&
&

&N& )

&
&T
$

#
&O!&)&

#

&

&&

.
&
#

#&

+
S
&
&
/

%%& &
#/&$
&&+
S
&&
/+
"F
& . &
&
&

/
#/

%&13$

/
1' '"$$2 3
456767847:IB>AC<BEQB>A<BEAQ=>BMD@ABCDE<BA=<B@:

! "#"!
!$"# %&

'#&&
& &

$

$%&

&

(

$&
#

&

&
'&

& $&#&
&$ #'

&
' )&
*
+(

$
&$&
)&

&&
&

$$&
$

#&%

&

&
&
)$
&
'&&&*
,-
$

& &
'&

&&$

'.& $&$'
)&
&
&#

&

&'.& /*
0

)&
'&
1
234$

&
#

&
*
5
$

&
#

&
&&
'# '

&
)&
$&

*
65
&
#

&
'
&
#
&
&

'$

7 $&$&*&
8(

%

&
&

)

&
'

&
&

&#& &'

& $

19 9"$$
2 4
:;<=<=>:?@ABCDDBEFGCHIDFDJBAEJKEABHCELMEABCELBA@
N
&)

)&
#'

'
&

$
& &

& & &

7

&

19 9"$$2 4
:;<=<=>:O@PQJMFQCRHCKEABHCELMEABCELBMDAESJQBEHJGCHLDDMEJSA@

'
'# &
& T

)'&

'7
$
&&

#'
'%&

'

&&
$ &
&#'

'

&
& T

#'

'
&

&

&
$

&

U&

&9$V &V &$ &
&$& T

'#&

#'

'%&1&

$ & T4

%&$&
#

&
1&

$

4#'

&#'

'
&
U&

&+'V
'9%&14

'%&1&

$ & T4

%&$

1&

$

4'&

&
& &#'$&%

&

&%

&
$
&
' )&
(

&
#
&$
) #'

&
&
&

&$
&& '&
$#$N
&

&#'%&$
$ &
&$

&
&

&&

$

&& #'

&$$
'&
1 234$

'%&$

%

&
&

&

$&& & $

'%&&

'1!24 '$

&
&
&%

&
%

&&$
&

&
&
#
&

'&$

&
&%
&$

&&$
&N

'
1!24 '$

&&$
&

&)%

&

&
&$

&
(
&
&&

$

&

&&

&
#
& '$

&

U&

$ & T$

'&

&

&)&
'

&
&

$$&
&$
&

#

'&#
'U&

$

$

&)&
'&
1
234$

&)&
'

&
&
&
$$&
&$
&

#

&
$

&#

#

&&'$

'.& $&$' )&

T)#$$
&%
#'%&$

&

&
'W&
''

)

& $ &
&& )
& T

! "#"!
!$"# %&

! "#"!
!$"# %&
'&

&()*&+*
)*
&,
&

)
&

)#)
&

&
& &&&& & -#)

# &

&
&

&
,
&)&

&
& &&)%

&
$

)/%&01%
&

#.

)

1
&

&2&
)31% & #)
& &
$ &

$

3!1%%& &
#)&$

&31%%& &
#)&$
&&
!4&)52

&6

&$

&01 )$
&
&$ &
&

$

)
&

)#&

&
& &

&&)2

&&&%

&

$$&
2 &

$& &

&
$ &
&& -

)#&#
&

$
-&%&

&

$ &&,

)$% $

&)2

&

)
&

$$

)%&01
7
+$4&)8&9&
&$

&)2

&

&)
&#$

&0&

$ &
& &&

#)

)%&

&1#$

)
&0&

$ &
& &&

#)

)
&1

2%&# )/&

)

&

&%

& -

)#
$&
&$&&
&#)

&32
%2

&

)

&

&
&0:1
)

)0!:1 )$

&$

&)2

&

&)
&

%

)0!:1 )$

&$

&)2

&
&

2%&# ),

2%

&&
$

&
$

&
$$

)%&0

%&01$ & -

%&$

&

)#1&

&
&
01#)$
&

&
&0:1 )

&
&)$$

)%&

&
)
2 )$

&)2

&

#2&)%

&
$
&
4&)8&

&)
&&

#)
&$
)%&

&

&
%

$$&
2 &

&

#.

)

$
# &
&
& $%

)
$&
&$
&&
&'$# &

/&)2

&& &)

2 &2

&
&

$$&
2 &
&

)
$&
&

#
&#$

&
2&
)$20
1 )$

&
& &&
&$
)%

&
%&
)
0:1 )$

&
& &&
&$&'$

&
&

$$&

2 & &

) &

$&
&

#$&

&$

&%

#

&

$

2%#
#)

)
&

&

$

&)
&
&
%

#.

)

$&
&$&&
&
#&%
&
#
$ #)

&
)%

&
#2

%&01$

#.
$

&)
&&

#)

)
&

2%&# )

&%

$$&
2 &

&

#.

)&
#
)& $%

)
$&
&$&&
&'$# &

/&)2

&& &)

2 &2

)
&

)#
&

$$&
2 &

&

)
$&
&

#
&#$

&
%

&2&
)$20
1 )$

&
& &&
&'$

)
&

)#
&

$$&
2 & &

) &

$&
&

#$&
&$

2%&# )3$

&#)

&

#

&

$

2%##)

)
&

&

&)
&
&
%

#.

)

$&
&$&&
&
#&%
&
#$ #)

&
)

)
-%

&
#2

)%&01
(8

&
;
9&
&
&

#.

)0&

$
& -1
0&

$

1
$

# &
&

! "#"!
!$"# %&

! "#"!
!$"# %& '

&
$&
&$&&
&#(

#
%

&

&

&&&

(

#

$

&
& &)

#
&

&$
($*+ , ($

&
&

$&&
&&
&
$&& *

(& &

&
&&
(+', ($

&
&

$&&
&&
&
$

& $

#
(*

%&+,$

& -$

&

(##($
.$

#
(*

&
&
$

(%&+,#($

&

(
&&

&%

&&(*&

&

&$$
&+ , (

&
%

&
$(& &&
&/

* $

(%&+,%

#
&

&

$
(%&

&
&
&$

&&
&
&$ $
&

&
#$ ($

(0*
%*

&
*

(
%&+,%

&
(+"', ($

&1
&
&
$(& &&
&$
& -%

& $*+' , ($

&1
&
&
$(
& &&
&$

&

$
%#
#$& &#(

&&

&&

#2

(

3$

#2

(+&

$ & -,
(
&

$

,&
(*#$

$%(

%&+,$

(
&

$

*
&&

&

#
&
&

($
$&

&

4

#
&
%

&$$
&+ , ($

(
&
&

& -

$&
&$&&
&0$&
&

&

$$
&+ , (

#
&
#
& $& & $

$$
&+ , (
.5
6$5&
&7&8

&&
$

&
$
#
&$

&
$(& &&
&
(
$ &
&& -

(#
#*&#($
&

&$$
&+ , (

&

&
$&(&
%&+,$

$$

&

*
&
&
+,)
&(

&
#*

95&
&7&

&
&$
#
&&(&
&

&

&$
($*+ , ($

$

$

&
&&
&%

&
&
&&

#2

(
$ &
&& -

(#)
&$

&
#&%
&&

$& &$$
& &
&

&&

&
#$ %

&$

-
&&

$
($*+ , (

&
&
#
&&

&&
&

#

&:&

&1& &$ & &&& &$
(

&&
$
&

%&+,$

#2

(%&$
&

;/& &<()
.&)
&
#
&&

(1

&

* &&

&&
&
&&

&
$
&
&
$

3$&&
&
($ &
&& -

&

$(

&$&
&

$&&$

(3$&&
&

&
&
$(&
#

&
&

#
&

#2
&

$&&$

&
&
&
$(

1
#
& (&
&$(&

&
( *&
&

&
#

&
1&

(

=
#
&

& #2

&
#
%

&

#

&
&
$ &
#

&

#
&&&
#

&

/

()
6&(&%&$
(
#2

&
& &

*

(
&#(

&

&

*&$

$

)

(
&

*

(

&$*%

&

*&$

&1 &&

&&
&

(

&
$*%%

(

&
#
$& &&

&

! "#"!
!$"# %&

! "#"!
!$"# %&
'(&
& )&*+,
-
+-
&,

+
&
&

&

#$
.&

&/&&
&$
+$ &
&$
.&

+$&/ &&

&&
$

+.
&

&,

+
&#+%

&+.0
. $ .

&/
&#

&
.&&
&. &&

&&

#

#+$
12
#$

&$&+%&$

& 3$
+&

&
&4.
%.

$&$
$&

&

$&+

1!2#$

&+#

#+

1!2#$

&5$

+
&.&&
&0
& &&

&&

+12
# &
& 3

+#&

+3

&
$+

%&12$

& 3

%&$

+
&/

&5$

+
&$

3$&
&&

&&&
+162 +$
$

&
0
&.

&

&

+
%&12+

+

&
&
# $& &&

&

((
7
+8

& &
&& 3

&

,

&$

& 3

#
& $

+#4
9

&$

/#
& +&
&$+&

&
+
.&
&
$

&
#

&
&

4
!

&$

$&$&$

& 3

4

&$

0

$+

&
&&
$

$&&
$

#. 4
,
&$ &
&4&
"

$&
&

#

& $$

&
58
&:$8

&

$ +$

&
# &

$$$

&
+
$

&
+$;
&#+

+3
+$%&
$$
.
,

+3

& +$

$
#%3&
&

&

#
&$$&

%&12&
&
12$

#0

+
,

&

#

&
&

&$

+
4
,

&
#
&$

&
&4
!

&
&&

&

&
&
#

&
#<
&
&

&$

+

4&

$&

&
=>$$
:$)&
&?& &
&&

.&$

&

+

&
%

,
%&12$
+12

&
&& .

+12

#+
&6!!6"$

@>$$
:$A& &
&B
& &
& &&

#+
&$
+%&

&&& &
&1 &#+

&&

$+& &&
&&

&&
&#+

&&

&
2$ & 3

&&

&&&&

+1&

$ & 32
#
&
+

$

2
#& #+

+$ $$.
1 2+$

$$
.
$

$&
&&

&B
& &
& &
&

#+

+
&

&&& &
&$ & 3

+

$
$&#
+ &

#0

+
$

&
#
&6!!-$

%:$

&
&
&$ &
&$& 3

+#
%

%&
&+

&
&#+

+
&
%

%
# &%
&#+

&&
12&

$ & 3#+

%&$0
+$

#0

&

$

%

%&
&
# . #&
$
$

! "#"!
!$"# %&

&'$

%
&
#
#

($$
)$*&)$+

,+& -
*&
&.
&&%&$
' &

& /&
#

&
'$&
&

0

&
&&
&
&1
!!"$

& %
&

& #'

'&&%
&

'23$

'#$
#

$ $
%23'$

$$
0

$

&
4(
&&)$,5
&' $

$ &

&'#
& #'

'

&

%&$

& /&

$

$6
'$

'%&

&$ %

&
$ &
&7

# &%
&&

&

&8&

#&$

'
&#

%

& $
$ &

'0$

&23 '
&&$
&%

90
%0

''
&'0&

&&
&

&$ &

&& $

&&

&

&
&%

&%&$
#6

''

%&
#&
& &

&&$

&

2) ) "$$1 3
:;<=<=>:?@ABCDEBCDFGHHCIJKIIKGDGLMADEBAHNGHOKIFGHKJEKIFHKJF ECIKPDAFKGD@
)&& /

&
&

&
# #'

'
&
&

&
&'

(0 &

#

&
&%&
&%' 0 0 &
#

&
&%&

&

/

&
&

0 &

%
&

&
& &9
Q,
& /

&&

$ &
&
&
&1!!
1!!!$

0'

#'&

/
3
&

&
$

%&
R
&$
$$&$&&$
#

&

'
& $
'%&&
$&&&
&
&
#
$$&
&
&
&,
$& /

'#&

#'

'
&&%&$

#6

',

'

&
& &
&$$0
' &
& /

&$ &
&
$

&
&1!! $

8$& /

&
&

'T
$

#

&'2) ) "$$1 3
:;<=<=>:U@ECBGMKFKGDVAMFCHAFKGDVGHHCMGJAFKGDGLWHGWCHFXYOKMC ECIKPDAFKGDWHGJCCEKDPIAHCWCDEKDPZFCBWGHAHXWHGFCJFKGDI@ [&

&

&$ &
& &&'

&

&&

&
&

#

&
#S
&
&&%
&
$ & /
'
&

#
& &

#
#'&'
'
&
#
&&
&#

&

&
&

&

0

&

0

0&
0%
&' &

00 &0%0

0%04#
&

S&&'

&

&&

&
&

#

&
#S
&
&
#&
%

'

#&&
$&&
&#'

& &
&#'

'
&&'

& &
5& &

&'# #

&$&
&
#
/&
&
$

&
&$
&
& &&

&$ $
'
&0%

$
4
%

& &

'%0

&#
&
$

%/%
&

&'$

$&&$

$
#6

'

%/
%
'%

&
T
& ,

'

&
&&&

$
'& %$
8$&$& &

& &

&&

'
$ &
&
& /

'
& &

&
&&

'
& /

&$
$

'
&0%
0

'
#
&&

! "#"!
!$"# %&

! "#"!
!$"# %& !

&

#

#'

& (

&
&
&

&$

&

&
&

&
&
#

&
#'
&
&) *+ +"$$
, -
./01012.3456789:;<68=6;9:;><?@?6A7?:;B:;?A<CDE<78<CF@G@?;EB?E;:@GAC8 6DH:B?@=6;?I=<J:I:A;@6=AF:AC8678:;4

&)%(&KK&
&& &
& &
)

&K&
)

$
)$K* -) & % & #)& & $ &

)L
$

#

%
&
#&#
)#)

&*,- )&

&
&,
$

&,"
#

#M

)*!,- )
&

&$&)
N

&)#

%K&$&
&
#
(&
&
$

)*!,- )
& &

)*!,- )$

& $

)*!,- )
& O

)%K

)*!,- )
& $

#M

)&
&
#
)

%(%
&

&)

$&&$

%
)%

&
L
& P( &

&
%

&

)

$
$
&

&

&,!!$

*+ + "$$, -
./01012.Q4B:;?<=<BA?:6=A99;69;<A?:C:@@4
R&%&

&

)

&

#

#'

&

&$ &
& (&
#

&
)%

$

K&
$& #&&

$
$
&
$
$&

&

$S &)&
&&& S $& &

$
$

&
$
$&

)#

$

&
&&%
&

&&

&&&$&&&
#

&
& &

K #%

&
&%&$

)&&&
#

&
)&

)

$
$
&#)$&%

&
&%

&
$
&
) K&

O

&
#
&$K #)

&
&
&

&$
&& )&
$#$
U+ &)
&
&&
& V

$
$
&
&
#

$ &)
&
&&& $ &
& (
)%

&

+ &)&
&&
&
&%(&& (
)
)%

$%&&
&
W&
#)%

&$
X
Y&KK

)

$&
&#
&

#M

$

$K&
)& &
&&
&$& &
)&
&X&
!W&
&KK
&$ &
&$

)
Z[
& TVK%+$R&&
#

&N
Y&
\
W

&)&

&%(
&&&&
#

&
)
#K%

&
&
&$

%(
#%

%
$

$
$
&
#

&$

$

$%&
K
&KK&&&&
#

&

R%&

&&
&&%#
&

& #M
& &%&)$

$&
& %X&
V &&
&K#$

$%)

&
&$
$
$
&$%( &&&&
#

&
)
#
K% &

&&
$
$
&$%( && (
&
#

&
)
W
&

KVK%

$
$
&)#
#)

$%(

$%&&
&

! "#"!
!$"# %&

! "#"!
!$"# %&
'

&
(&
&))
&$ &
&)#
*$

$&&
$

$ &
& +
*%

%+&& +&
#

&
*
*%

&
,

&
%+&&&&
#

&
*
*%

&
$

&

#
&-$

&
.$

%+%
&

&&$&

&$ &

&)#
*$

$&&$

& /%

& +& &
#

&

%
*%

&
,
& 0#/%

&&&
#

&

%
*%

&
$

&
#
&-$

$
$
&
.$

&&$&

&$ &

&)#
*$

$&&$

& +&
#

&
*%

&
,
& 0#/%

&&&
#

&
*%

& &
#
&-$

&$
$
$
&

&$)%
.$

%+%

&&$&

&$ &

&)#
*$

$&&$

& +&
#

&

%
&
*%

&
,
& 0#/%

&&&
#

&

%
&
*%

&
$

&
#
&-$

*
&*

&$
$
$
&$

&$)%
!
&
&$
$
$
&
#

&#*

&
%&
*&
1/ *$
$

&
2+

*#)

&

&

))%&
#

$%&
.&+& &
$

*$

#
&&

#*& %)
*) &
&%& %
&

&#

&
0
#.&+& &
$

*$

$
#

)

& $

#*& %)
*) &
&
$&%

3#%+%*& &
&# 0
'&
$$)&

& %&

&
&&
&0
4
&
&%+& &
&$#+&

&
&&&0

&$&%$&& %0
$

&&
$%&&& #
&
&
&0
5&

&)&

&$
& &

&
$* &

$&&$

*

0
6%)&$ )%*%+%*&
0
'&
&$

$

%&*&
&
#&
6
$

&
&
#&

#&
&
&
&&
#+&

&
$0
7.&

&$&%

&0
+')$
&

&&$#
&

#7
0 8

#&

*%+&

$
&&

#
&*

&
&$

&&&
)#$

$%*%

&&
&&
&

! "#"!
!$"# %&

! "#"!
!$"# %&
'&
( &

&
&

&$$
&&

) *+$

&& &&
-
&-#
(

#

$%(.&
&'

&
#

&%/
& #(

01&2-%3
&
$
$
&
&$

&$
-%

&
#&

&

$

$

-
&
&

&

&

4
5&%

&
&
-
&$

&
5

& &

$& /&
#

&

#
&1$

$
&&&
#

&

3 &
$
$
&

$
&
&$& /&
#

&

(
&

&
& 4

$
&(#

$ &

(5
&

-
&
6&
$

&

&

&

$
$

&%

&
()"7+ (8

&

&
#
& #(

%
&
&(
(%

-&$109
%

&&&
$

%&
%
(
$$&

& $
&
&

()!7+ (&%

&(,&$
&
#

(

& $

()"7+ ( &%

&

&

#
&
#

& &
-

& 109
%
#8

&
$

#
&&

$
$
&
#-&#(%

&&
&
-
$

%&%&5 &
&

-

$$
&) + (

&
8 &
$
$
$
&(
#

- &

&
&

& &(

&$
&%

&#&&-&&
&

&$#
($

%/
&
&&%

$
$
&
8 &

$
$
&$
$&

%/
1%

&
5
& .
:&
&

&%

&
5
& #

& -

$&&$

$& /
&
#

&
(.
!;
$

&
$
#
&1$

&&&
#

&
(.

#
$

&

&&

&
&
#

&

#,
&
&$& /&
#

&
(&

(5 &

-
&
<0
&&'$8=
&( $

$ &
#
&:0$

&(#

& #(

%&$

#4

(;

# &%
&&

&

&
>8

$
$
&
& #-
%&
($
)+&

$
&
&#
&
)$

+
#&
&

&
#(

$

-#& & #&

&<
$

#
&

? ?&
#
&
&

& $

&
&

$
8
#
&$
$&
%&
#
&
&

& $

&
&

$

#

$

@0
&&'$1
$
;&

- &
-&
#& $
$
$

&(#
& $ $

&
&
%-)+&

%&&
#

$&

&& (&
$#$8

(-
&
&(- &(&(

$

&&($

&
%

(-&
&(- &(&(

$

&&#
&

#
&

(5 &

-
&
A
$
&
&
&
$(&

$
$
&&
&$-

&
#
& & &

&&& #(

# (

! "#"!
!$"# %&

! "#"!
!$"# %& "
'%
&
&

%
& #(

)(&
$#$

&

#

&&
&$ $
&*+ +"$$, -
./010122/345678984:75;954;<;=84>:6?@>8A3
B
&(

$
$&

%
&

&
&$
&
& C&
#

&
(%
&
$&

&$&&#&
$
$

&%

&
&

$

(D%&*-
&(& C
&
#

&
(

%
#E

$&
&
##$
$
$&

&

&
&%&$

((

$
$&

#($&
%

&
&%

&
$
&
( '&
B

&
#
&
$' #(

&
&
&

&$
&& (&
$#$

&& $
& '%#(&
&

&

#(

&$
&
#

&
B

&
&

$%&&$
&
B

C
'
$

(&

&
&
&
B

C
'
$

($

&$

&

&

&
!B

$

&

&
&

$& &&

%

&
#

&

& &$&(

#
($
#

&
F$

(%&&
&

&

&$&
&&

(

$&
&

&
&
$(&

&
&

& $#
#

&

&

#G
&& &

&

&
&
"B

$$#
#

&

&
#G
&& &

&

&

&

$&
&$&
&&

(

B

C
'
$

%&
&
C$#
#

&

&

#G
&& &

&

&

&

$&
&$&
&&

(
H&
&

(G& $&$( '&

&$
& &&&
&
&& &
&&&

&$

&&&

$%$
#
'
&

('

(
'

&&

&

$

&
&#&$

(%&$ '&
&&
'&
#&$
('#

%&
&

,
&(

&$
&

(&#(

&

&

&
C

'
$

(&
&#

&

#
& %

'

%*-(#(

%&&
&&&
&%

$&&&%&
$

(I
#B

&
$

($

%

(*!"-&

$

&

($%

&
&
&$

&
$&(#
%&

%&&
&

&$%

(%

& &(
$$&&&#
%&

& #
(I&

&(
&$

($&
& C & $$' $&(%

'

%*-(
J)
#K&+&

&
&$
$
$&

& &(#'%*-

#
&#$

&&&&

&

%

&
(*",- (
%

&('
&
&(' &(

&L

&(#
&
&
(%

&(

&$
$
$
&B

&
$

#
&
#'&

! "#"!
!$"# %&

! "#"!
!$"# %&

#'%

&&
&
(
$

%&%&) &

&

(

$$
&* + '

&
,-& &.
&
&
(&
&$
$
$&

&

$%&$& &
.

&
/
(
$

#0

'
&&&#'

0
&
(
$

'$

&

&
&# &

/
(
$

'$

&

&
&&

$
&

&
&1&
.
0
&
(
$

#0

'$

#

&

&
#2
&
& &

&

&
/&# &

/
(
$

'$

#

&

&
#2
&& &

&

$
#

&

&

#2
&& &

&&

&#&$
$ (&
&&
(&
#&$
'(#
&

&&&#'

0
&
(
$

'
$

&

&
&# &

/
(
$

'$

&

&
&&

$
&

&
&
3,&
&4$
(5$

&(&
&$
$
$&

'&
&
(

6

&
&$('$'&
#

&

(
&$&'(
'&

&&
(
&&&

#0

'
7,4$,
$
8&($

$
$&

#$%

#
&$$

& &'

&
&'
&

-7$$
(&4$,
$
9
$
$&

#$$
(
&

(

:7
&&4$.;
&' $

$ &

&'#
& #'

%&$

#0

'6

#
&%
&&

&

&*4 4"$$< +
=>?@?@AA=BCDEFGHGCIFDJHGKDLGMGNGLGFOB

&'%&$
'&

&

'
&'
$&
&%

&
&
&

#0

'&
&#
'&

$
$

(&$

$
$
$&#
'
# #'$&%

&
&%

&
$
&
' (&
.

&
#
&$( #'

&
&
&

&$
&& '&
$#$,$

&

#(
'
#$

&#'

&#&
(
&$
&

&&&

#0

'%

P
&

(;
Q

'*!<+ '$

$&$

&
&
&%

&
%

&&$
&

&
&
#&

'&$

&
&
%
&$

&&$
&Q

'*!<+ '$

&&$
&

&(%

&
&
&$

&
.

&
&&

$

&
&&

&
#
& '$

&

Q

'*!<+ '$

& (&

'%&#'$
%

&&'(

&

&%

#0

'&#
'5$

&
$&

'&#

'

$
$&#
'1#

'&#
'

$
5$

$
&
(&'(

& &

#0

'%

'*!<+ '

$
%
# $& &$&#
'&

$
$&#
'%

'
,R&
$
;&'7(

&5$

$
$&#
'

&
&

&(

&

'

&1(
%(

&

'

&

&
&*<+ '

'*!<+ '$

&$

&'(

&

&

%

'*!<+

! "#"!
!$"# %&

! "#"!
!$"# %&
'$

&$

&
%

(

)
%

&&
$

&
$

&
&
& &' &

&
*+#'$
&

&
&*,+ '

&-$# &

.
&')

&& &'

) &)

&
&

#/

'&
&#
'

$
0#

&$&

#/

'&#
'

&

$

12$$
3$4
$
3$-&#
'

$
$&#
'#

'
&$
&

&& 5 &
& &&&&

#/

'&%
&
$ $
)&*
+'$

$
&6

$
$&#
'&$$

#/

'

&
#
&

&)&
'&
&
#
#/

)&$
&,!!
& ,!
!$

22$$
3$7&
&3$4
$

$&
&
&&

$
$&#
'#

%&$

#/

'& &'
&&

$$&&

&$
$
$
&#
'&&&

'$ $$)* +'
&'

$&
&
&'
)#$

#/

'&

&)&
'$
&
'

82
&&3$(9
&' $

$ &

&'#
& #'

%&$

#/

':

# &
%
&&

&

&*3 3"$$, +
;<=>=>???@ABBCADEFGHIADHJKLGMCNHEHLIEOCPAOMHIPNCOJHGHNAJCELG ABBOLBOHAJCICEEQNCOJHGHNAJCELGCNLILRHNSAOMESHBQAIMNCOJHGHNAJCELG HICDHPHTHDHJK@

'(
1&3&'

&
$
$
$
&
$
$
&

$
$&#
'&%&$&

&

&%

#/
$

&

#&

$&$ &
&

$

&

$

(

'
&

)

'

&$)%

&

)&$

$

U8&
'3$1
34&1&
&' &$

& &

$
$
&
$
$&

$
$&#
'
&

#$&$&
#

# &

&&

$
)%#'

'
&

&

)&$

$

4
3$1

&
&#'

&

&,!!$

'
#

&$$
&* + '$

&

&

&

$

1
3$4&

&
&#'

&

&

&,!!,!!,
,!!$

'
&%

&$$
&* + '$

&

&

&

$

&#'

&

&

&'
&$

'#
$
'
&)%

&

)&$

$

(

'
&

%

&
'*",+ '$
&
$

$)%

'#%

&&'
&

'%&%&8

%

# &$

& )$

&. &*3 3"$$, + ;<=>=>??>@SHEJLOHNBOLBCOJKMHENDLEVOC@

8
$

$%&

)

&&
$

#%
UWX2Y

&$&
'
&
&&
&&%

&$$

'$

&&
%
5

)$&&
%

#/
$&
&
&

'
&
&ZU
'Z&
)&
[-:(-7\
\27(
&&
%

#
&
&$
'$

5& $%

] #'%

&&
$&
&
3882Y(39WY4^
:2
%

#'#
'
&

&&
%

&

$

'
&
&#'

! "#"!
!$"# %&

! "#"!
!$"# %&
'()*+
&,&
&

&
&$
,
-&

#

&,

&

&
,
+*
./+'/*+010+
)2
304')

&
&$

$
,&%

&&
,
#,&$

&

&

&
&5&

&&$$

2
.*

&
&$

&$$
,$

#
,& &

&$

,#
%&

& #
,
&
&$

&$
,&

%

&&$3$&3-3
& &
&
&$

&$
&
&,6

&
2*..4)7
7*)0

&&
%

&&&
%

&
&%

&&

& %
#
&#
,$

,&&
%

,$#
,%
$&
#
,$
,$%

&
&
& &
&$$

84$
,
#& &
#,

,$8-,9& :
,%

&
&

&

&-&
,% & #,& &
$ &

&&
$

,
&&,
,
&
&-

#
,$

&
&$&

#
,$

,6

&
,

4$
&,

&

,%&%& &
#,&$

&&$
&&

%&&&

-

#
,%

&

&$&

#
,$

$
%0
%&

&&

-

&
;<

#
,
#$
&$&,&
&&
&&, &

#&$

&
&&,

&;=<
& ,#$

$

$

&$$

0

%

&$$%&& &&

&$$

&

&
3
&,&%
-

-&$

&
#
#>

&
&
$ &

!$

4&
&#
,%
&
-

#,

#
&8$

&,#&-
&$ & &,

-#
%&

,
?0

&
$

&
&
,

&
&
#>

3-
3
&=&,
&
&
*0

&
$

&&
&
&,
#
&
,%&
&
,
-
& 3$&%;' '"$$= <
@ABCBCDDEFGHIHJKLMNNGHOMPHGHJQJRSKTRUMJHRTVRWNSRNKSJHKVSKXYHSKLJR ORINGQZHJ[VKOSKJMSQRWHTJKSHRSVJMTLMSLVF
)
%

& &&,

&
$

&, &
& :

&-
&$%

#,
&&
#,

,$8-,9

,$&
6
& $
#

&

&

!"3\+"!;#<&

&$

#

&

#
&
#
$

-&&
&=!!"=!!
=!
!=!!=!!==!!& =!!$

5-
%-

,
#
#>

-&$

$
&& $$$

&$&$&

&$&
& &
+ $

&
&
$&,

&

&
#
&=!! 9$

-&$

-&
&
&&,
,

&
&
%

#- &
& $$

&;' '"$$
= <
@ABCBCDD]FKTWRSOKIKTJMTLNKTMGJHKVF

&,&%
-

&
$

$
#,&
#,

&
&
$
,%

&
&$-$&,
$

&

#
#>

&$&

&
$

&

!$

84&
&

,&,

&
&
&$& :
&
#

&
,&-
&$

,
#&
&& ,##

#,

! "#"!
!$"# %&

! "#"!
!$"# %& '
()&
&

*

+

*

*

&

+&
$
*$ &

*,"'-&

*#
%$&*

&
&
&&+
&$

%&#
&

&

*

&&
&

+
&&

%.&
&
%

&
/
& 0

$

&
*

*&
&

&
$

&
&
&$

*&
&

&
&
&*$

+&
&& +$

#1

*

&
%

*#
&
#
#*

*
&
# &
&$&*
#

&

$ +&
$

#1

*
20

*

&**&
&&
&$&1
&
+$

&+
&
%

#

&&

&&
$&*
$

*

*

*

*
&+
&$

3
&*&%

#

#4&

&

& .
*& &

%

+&
&$
$

#

&

*

&

+
&

&

&
**#
&

0
+
*
#&
&
& &
&
$&*&&
+#
5)&
&
&*

+
&&*+
&$

*#&$ #*+

&#

*6
&

&
&
& &

&*&

&
%

+&0
+
&

+& &

+)&&*

&

**.
&#

$%&

*&&
&1
&
&#

7
&
$

+
$

$&*&+

&&
&&
&
+*

#
&
$

+
&& $

&#
$&& #&&
&
&

#
&,8 8"$$' -
9:;<;<==>?@ABBCDEFDGHBGFDFIBJBGFEKGLMNDILDGH@BAJDFE? 0
&
*
&

&

&+&
&$
*#
&

#1

&

+ &

&
&
#*

$$
+

$

&
+ #
&

$$
+

$

&

&

*#
&

&

+&$

&

%8&

4 #*&*

&

&

#
&

#&

+&$

*,8 8"$$' -
9:;<;<==O?PBBE?
0
*
&*#*

&
#

$,-$&
&
&

&&
& &
&

&&
#&

&

,8 8"$$' -
9:;<;<==Q?RKDSBATPDGIDBNPBBE?
U

&

&

&&

$

*
&

&&&&*%

%&$ &

*

&
.&
+

&$
&

& ,"'''-

$
$& *%+&%
&

#*
&'!!!'$

V0

*
&&&&&*&*
.
&

&

#
&
$

#1
$&
+

W5& &6

0

*
&&&&&
&

.
&

&

*
&&&&&$&

%&

&&#*

.&
&

&
.&

(6+%&W *0

*
&
+%&
&$

&

#
&
&

&&&
&

+%#*

&&&&)$

&$

&

#
&&&
&

+%#*

&&&&

&&&&
#

+%&# *$

&$

&

! "#"!
!$"# %&

! "#"!
!$"# %&
'(

&
&$

&

&
#
#

&%
&

)&

$

&
& &

&
#

#$

*
&

&&&&+ &
#
&,$

&-
$

&
#

&

&./0 *

&.1 1"$$/ 0
23454566789:;<=>?@ABC=B@C;:@DED9F==GA:D;C:9;BC=B@C;:@D8
H
+&$

&
*

*%&
I
%+

*
&*&

&
*%&
*

&/!!/!!!$

$%&&*

JH
+&$

&
*

%& #*
#

&

$&
&

&& K

&
&$

*&

*
&

$
*$
& K

.1 1"$$/ 0
2345456538AL?M@C=NDL?A:OO@A:L;@G<AL?M@C=NDBC=B@C;:@D8 -

&

&

&

&
#P
&
#

&

&$
* $ &
&#
*$ &
&$

#
&$$

&

*
&
&$ &
&
&

&
&&&

%$$

#& Q&

*& $

&
&*

&$ &
&
&R&

#
&$$

*
&
$*

&%
&$

&&
K&#$$

&

%

$#
&
+

*

&

&*
&
K&

&

#
&
&

$
$

&&

&#
*.1 1"$$/ 0
TAB G
P.O. Box 542
Long Beach, CA
562.500.9451
1 Ostashay & Associates

DocuSign Envelope ID: 25C9B05E-9F0C-4D2E-AFF5-87EC757574B1 PEER REVIEW ASSESSMENT: Historical Resources Assessment – 1001 North Roxbury Drive 2 Introduction
Generally, peer reviews of historic resources assessment reports are conducted to reassure lead agencies requesting the assessments that the identification and evaluation efforts performed are adequate, that the eligibility determinations made are logical and well supported, and that the document will, if necessary, facilitate regulatory compliance under the provisions of CEQA and the local municipal code. Review of historic resources documents for quality control is an essential part of the environmental review process.

Methodology
To complete this peer review memo, Ms. Ostashay completed the following tasks:
• Reviewed the “Certificate of Ineligibility” application (November 18, 2021) and also reviewed the “draft” historic resources assessment report prepared for the subject property by ESA dated October 2021.
• Reviewed the City’s Historic Preservation Ordinance (BHMC 10-03-32) and prior citysponsored historic resources surveys, survey updates, and historic context statements. As applicable, OAC also reviewed other related survey material prepared in association with SurveyLA, which was a City of Los Angeles sponsored project. • Conducted additional archival research on the history of the subject property; its original owner and builder; physical alterations; past owners and occupants, and immediate the neighborhood. The extent of the research conducted by OAC was limited to what was necessary to assess the validity of the historic context developed and evaluation findings presented in the ESA assessment report. Background research performed included a review of many on-line resources locally and globally from a multitude of diverse research, archival, library, museum, and academic repositories and collections, including the Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals.
• Reviewed relevant National Park Service (NPS) guidance documents on evaluating the significance of potential historic properties. Also searched the National Register online database, the City’s online sources, and OAC’s in-house library for any properties with similar contexts or evaluated under similar criteria as those discussed in the ESA assessment report DocuSign Envelope ID: 25C9B05E-9F0C-4D2E-AFF5-87EC757574B1 PEER REVIEW ASSESSMENT: Historical Resources Assessment – 1001 North Roxbury Drive 3 (i.e. association with single-family residential development patterns, architecture and aesthetics, listing in the City’s List of Local Master Architects, etc.). • Considered and analyzed the assessment findings and research presented in the submitted assessment report for validity, clarity, and conformance with the basic professional principles and best practices for identifying and evaluating the significance of potential historic properties.
• Summarized the results of all of the tasks listed above within this memo.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 25C9B05E-9F0C-4D2E-AFF5-87EC757574B1 PEER REVIEW ASSESSMENT: Historical Resources Assessment – 1001 North Roxbury Drive 4 OAC has assessed the subject property’s historic integrity as follows:

Location: The place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred.

The property remains at its original location and, therefore, retains this aspect of integrity.

Design: The combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of a property.

Setting: The physical environment of a historic property.

OAC, therefore, believesthe surrounding neighborhood setting is relatively retained.

Materials: The physical elements that were combined or deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to form a historic property.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 25C9B05E-9F0C-4D2E-AFF5-87EC757574B1 PEER REVIEW ASSESSMENT: Historical Resources Assessment – 1001 North Roxbury Drive 5 and the brick veneer has been painted. The window panes were replaced within the original metal window frames, which maintained the visual profile and depth of read of the original framing and glazing system. For safety and general maintenance needs it is common to have the roof replaced and such work was done in-kind and per code. The addition of chimneys occurred primarily along the back half of the house and do not adversely compromise those important characteristics that define the Regency Revival architectural style of the house. The noted concern regarding the painting of the brick veneer is also questionable as it is unknown at this time whether the brick was originally painted white or not (as was also typical of the period and style). These modifications, many of which are rehabilitation or on-going general maintenance items, appear to have been conducted in-kind as to avoid adversely impacting the overall architectural quality and signature character-defining features of the residence. Those character-defining features including the recessed wood paneled front entrance door with rectilinear transom window, arched shaped window openings and associated wood louvered shutters, broken pediments over the entry and window openings, gable roof with a series of wall and roof dormers, polygonal projecting bay windows with standing seam metal roofs, multi-pane fenestration, balconettes with iron railings, and mixed cladding of brick, horizontal wood siding, and smooth plaster sheathing from its period of significance that identify as a Regency Revival style property are still visually and physically evident from the public right-of-way. Therefore, OAC finds the property retains integrity of materials.

Workmanship: The physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory.

Feeling: A property’s expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time.

Association: The direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property.

In conclusion, OAC does not concur with the findings made in the ESA report that the property lacks integrity of workmanship, materials, and setting; and that it does not retain integrity to convey the appearance of its original construction intact. In assessing the subject property’s construction history, DocuSign Envelope ID: 25C9B05E-9F0C-4D2E-AFF5-87EC757574B1 PEER REVIEW ASSESSMENT: Historical Resources Assessment – 1001 North Roxbury Drive 6 permit history, and historical integrity, it is OAC’s professional opinion that the residence retains the essential physical features (character-defining) that visually and physically conveys the property’s historic character and well-executed Regency Revival architectural style from its period of significance.