Beverly Hills City Council
July 19, 2022

AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: July 19, 2022
Item Number:

To: Honorable Mayor & City Council
From: Ryan Gohlich, Director of Community Development
Masa Alkire, Project Manager
Subject: CITY COUNCIL CONCURRENCE WITH APPLICANT WAIVER OF

SUBDIVISION MAP ACT PROCESSING TIMELINES RELATED TO
AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S CONDITIONAL
APPROVAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (VTPM) NO.
82872, WHICH IS ONE COMPONENT OF THE CHEVAL BLANC

BEVERLY HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT
Attachments: 1. LVMH letter consenting to extending the time limit to hear an appeal of the subdivision map approval for the Cheval Blanc Project, dated June 30, 2022

2. City letter dated July 7, 2022, to GK Law regarding processing of appeal

3. GK Law Appeal Petition, dated June 23, 2022

4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 1991 conditionally approving VTPM 82872, adopted June 13, 2022

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council concur with the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills project applicant to extend the hearing date to consider the appeal of the Planning Commission’s conditional approval of VTPM No. 82872 beyond the time limits stipulated in Subdivision Map Act (SMA) Section 66452.5 (d)(1). This extension would allow the appeal of the contingent subdivision map approval to be reviewed concurrently with the other entitlements that the City Council will consider for the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Specific Plan Project. It is recommended the Project’s hearing occur in September 2022.

INTRODUCTION
On June 30, 2022, the City of Beverly Hills received an appeal petition (Attachment 3) from GK Law, on behalf of UNITE HERE Local 11, appealing four resolutions adopted by the Planning Commission on June 13, 2022 regarding the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Specific Plan Project. Three of the resolutions were not Project approvals, but recommendations to the City Council regarding proposed entitlements. One resolution (Attachment 4) is the Planning Commission’s contingent approval of the subdivision map E-6
Meeting Date: July 19, 2022

for the Project, subject to conditions of approval. The Planning Commission’s subdivision approval is contingent on the City Council’s future actions regarding the rest of the required Project entitlements. Because the City Council has not yet held a hearing to review the Project, and because the City Council cannot meaningfully review the subdivision map until it has first considered the related environmental impact report, general plan amendment, zoning changes, and Specific Plan, it is recommended that the appeal of the Planning Commission’s subdivision map approval be heard in conjunction with the City Council’s review of the rest of the Project entitlements. The Applicant has submitted a letter that, pursuant to SMA time limit extension provisions, they are in agreement with extending the timeline to hear the appeal of the Project’s subdivision map to September 2022 (Attachment 1). The action under consideration is the City Council’s concurrence with extending the time limit to hear the appeal to September 2022 pursuant to Government Code Section 66451.1(a).

DISCUSSION
The following points are identified for the City Council’s consideration of this topic:
• GK Law’s submitted appeal petition identifies that they intend to appeal the three resolutions making recommendations to the City Council and the Planning Commission’s contingent approval of the Project’s subdivision map. Staff and the City Attorney’s office do not believe the Planning Commission’s actions to forward recommendations to the City Council regarding the environmental impact report and other entitlements are appealable, and each of those matters will be presented to the Council as a matter of course in processing the Project. Thus, only the Planning Commission’s action on the subdivision map is appealable.

Nonetheless, the appeal petition includes many topics unrelated to the subdivision map approval. The appeal petition discusses topics related to required legislative actions and the required CEQA action for the Project. • The City Council has not held a hearing to consider the requested General Plan Amendment, Master Plan of Streets Amendment, Zone Text Amendment, Zone Map Amendment, Specific Plan and encroachment agreements. The City Council has not yet reviewed the Final EIR for the Project.
• In order to provide the City Council an opportunity to consider all the topics included in the GK Law appeal letter it is recommended that the City Council review the appeal of the Planning Commission’s subdivision approval action in conjunction with the City Council’s hearing on the rest of the requested Project entitlements.
• The procedures for an interested party to appeal an agency’s action on a subdivision map are provided in Subdivision Map Act Section 66452.5 (d)(1). GK Law timely submitted their appeal petition and submitted the required appeal fee within 10 days of the Planning Commission’s approval. Section 66452.5 (d)(1) requires the appeal hearing to be held within 45 days after the request filed by the appellant. However, Subdivision Map Act Section 66451.1 allows for the time limits specified in the chapter for reporting and acting on maps may be extended by mutual consent of the subdivider (LVMH) and the legislative body required to act (City Council). The subdivider has submitted a letter agreeing to extending the time limit to September 2022.
• The City has planned to hold the public hearing for the Project in September 2022 in order to provide the public the most opportunity to participate in the public review process for this Project. The intention is to not hold a Project Meeting Date: July 19, 2022

hearing in the summer months of July and August, when residents and other members of the public may not be available to attend a public hearing. • Public noticing, consistent with the requirements of the BHMC, will be provided at least 20 days in advance of a September 2022 hearing for the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Specific Plan Project.

CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Concur with the Applicant’s waiver of the subdivision map act processing timelines for the appeal of the Planning Commission’s conditional approval of Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82872 and hold the appeal hearing in September 2022 in conjunction with the City Council hearing for the other required Project entitlements.

FISCAL IMPACT
The recommendation in this report to extend the appeal hearing date has no budget or fiscal impacts for the City.

Ryan Gohlich, AICP
Community Development Director
Approved By
ATTACHMENT 1
19 EAST 57TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10022
June 30, 2022

VIA EMAIL
Mr. Masa Alkire
Project Manager
City of Beverly Hills
455 N. Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Re: Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills (PL2000138)
Dear Mr. Alkire:
468 N RODEO DRIVE LLC, 456 N RODEO DRIVE LLC, 461 N BEVERLY DRIVE LLC, and 449 N BEVERLY DRIVE LLC are the owners of the properties that are the subjects of the above-referenced Planning file and, with LVMH Hospitality, are the Applicants to the City of Beverly Hills (the “City”) for certification of a Final Environmental Impact Report and approval of a General Plan Amendment, Zone Text and Map Amendments, the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Specific Plan, a Master Plan of Streets Amendment, Encroachment Permits, a Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and a Development Agreement (collectively, the “Cheval Blanc Entitlements”). The applicants are affiliates of LVMH MOET HENNESSY LOUIS VUITTON INC. (“LVMH”).

I write to you regarding the administrative appeal filed by UNITE HERE Local 11 on June 23, 2022, challenging the Planning Commission’s June 13, 2022 conditional approval of the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map (the “Appeal”). LVMH understands that it is the City’s longstanding policy that City Council hearings on major development applications are not held during the months of July or August. Therefore, on behalf of the Applicants, LVMH agrees with the City to extend the time limit for a hearing on the Appeal pursuant to Government Code Section 66451.1(a). In addition, this extension will allow the appeal to be heard by the Council in September 2022, when all of the Cheval Blanc Entitlements are before that body.

Sincerely,
LVMH MOET HENNESSY LOUIS VUITTON INC.

Anish Melwani
Chief Executive Officer
cc: Dennis Ferrazzano, Esq.

Deborah E. Quick, Esq.

DocuSign Envelope ID: B20332DA-862C-473C-B759-8897E8134E47 ATTACHMENT 2
Laurence S. Wiener
City Attorney
II&GII..

IM
Jordan R. Sisson
GK Law
801 South Grand Avenue, 11th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
jordan(gideonlaw.net
Mr. Sisson:

July 7, 2022
Re: Appeal of Planning Commission actions regarding Cheval Blanc Hotel ProjectThe City of Beverly Hills has received the appeal petition filed on June 23, 2022, in whichUNITE HERE Local 11 purports to appeal various actions taken by the City’s Planning Commission on June 13, 2022, relating to the Cheval Blanc Specific Plan/Hotel project.

Specifically, your appeal letter indicates that the following actions are appealed:

1. Resolution recommending certification of the Project’s Environmental Impact Report (i.e., SCH No. 2020110223) (“EIR”)

2. Resolution recommending approval of General Plan Amendment, Master Plan of Streets Amendment, Zone Text Amendment, and Zone Map Amendment to establish the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Specific Plan;

3. Resolution recommending adoption of the Specific Plan and associated encroachment permits; and

4. Resolution conditionally approving Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82872 (“VTPM”), contingent on the City Council’s approval ofthe rest of the requested Project entitlements.

As a preliminary matter, and as acknowledged in the appeal letter, the Planning Commission actions as to the a) certification of the EIR, b) General Plan Amendment, c) Master Plan of Streets Amendment, d) Zone Text Amendment, e) Zone Map Amendment, f) Specific Plan and encroachment permits are recommendations to the City Council. Thus, these recommendationsare not final actions subject to appeal, and each of those matters will be presented to the CityCouncil for consideration at one or more future public hearings.

City ofBeverly Hills 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, California 90210 t(31o) 285-1055 J(31o) 285-1056 BeverlyHills.org Jordan R. Sisson
July 7, 2022

The Planning Commission’s contingent action to conditionally approve Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82872 is, however, appealable to the City Council. As you surely can appreciate, the City Council can not undertake meaningful consideration of the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map appeal without also considering the EIR, Specific Plan, and other related entitlements. Thus, the City intends to present the appeal to the City Council when the overall Cheval Blanc SpecificPlan project is presented to the City Council in September 2022. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66451 .1, the project applicant has agreed, as set forth in the attached letter, to extend the time limits in Section 66452.5(d)(1) for when appeal hearings are to be held in order to allow fora complete project presentation in September. Further, the City Council will consider consenting to the time extension at its July 19, 2022 City Council meeting.

Separate notice of the specific hearing date or dates in September, 2022 will be provided.

Should you have any questions regarding the processing of the appeal, please let us know.

Very truly yours,
WAAAJ
David M. Snow
Assistant City Attorney
Attachment(s)Cc: Ryan Gohlich, AICP, Director of Community Development Masa Alkire, AICP, Project Manager
Laurence Wiener, City Attorney
Deborah Quick, Applicant’s Counsel
B0785-l 673\2688733v2.doc
ATTACHMENT 3

APPEAL PETITIONS MUST BE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE WITHIN 10 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THE DECISION

APPEAL TO COMMISSION OR CITY COUNCIL
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY IN BLACK INK. June 11, 2022 Date
In accordance with the appeals procedure as authorized by the provisions of the Beverly Hills Mimicipal Code, the undersigned hereby appeals jfrom the decision of Planning (OflSfcial, Board e^Commission involved) rendered on June 13 , 2022 : which decision consisted of:

The grounds submitted for this appeal are as follows: (WARNING: State all erounds for appeal Describe how decision is inconsistent with law. Use extra paper if necessary,) Please see attached letter.

The undersigned discussed the decision being appealed widi: / Masa Alkire, Project Manager, Community Development Department June 16, 2022 (Dq)artm^t Head(s) Involved) 55e ~
It is requested that wntten notice of the time and place for the hearing on this appeal before the City Council be sent to:

Danielle Wilson on behalf of UNITE HERE Local 11 4J4 S. Lucas Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90017 Name ~ Addres
ignature of appealing party
464 S. Lucas Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90017
Address Phone: 818-534-799
Email: [email protected])
Telephone Number & Fax Number
Fee Paid (For City Cleric's use) DATE RECEIVED BEM HILLS CITV CLERK LOG NO. fOYZZ. Written Notice mailed to appellant: 2022 JUM 23 PH2:20 Copies to: City Council, City Manager, City Attorney, Vc\J Involved Department _ . , ^ a^i ^
Law
Jordan R. Sisson
801 South Grand Avenue, 11 th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Direct; (951) 542-2735
Fax: (213) 623-7755
E-mail: [email protected]
www.gideonlaw.uet
Land Use, Environmental & Municipal Lawyers
June 23,2022
VIA EMAIL & HAND-DELIVERY:

City Council
c/o City Clerk's Office
City Clerk Huma Ahmed
Masa Alkire, AlCP
City of Beverly Hills
455 N. Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
RE: Appeal of Planning Commission's Adoption of Various Resolutions involving the Cheval Blanc Specific Plan/Hotel Project (456 and 468 N. Rodeo Drive) on June 13,2022 Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers:

In accordance with the appeal procedures authorized by the Beverly Hills Municipal Code ("BHMC" or "Code") § 1-4-101, et seq., our client, UNITE HERE Local 11 ("Local 11"), hereby appeals ("Appeal") the City Planning Commission ("Commission") approvals involving the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Specific Plan ("Specific Plan") that would allow for the redevelopment of the above-referenced 1.28-acre location ("Site"). As proposed by Cheval Blanc (a division of LVMH Hospitality) ("Applicant"), the Specific Plan would allow up to a 220,950 square foot, 115-room luxury hotel with restaurant, penthouse, private club, restaurants, retail, and other uses ("Project").

Specifically, on June 13,2022, the Commission adopted the following resolutions:

1. Draft Resolution recommending certification of the Project's Environmental Impact Report (i.e., SCH No. 2020110223) ("EIR");i. 2

2. Draft Resolution recommending approval of General Plan Amendment, Master Plan of Streets Amendment, Zone Text Amendment, and Zone Map Amendment to establish the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Specific Plan;

3. Draft Resolution recommending adoption of the Specific Plan and associated encroachment permits; and

4. Draft Resolution conditiongllv gpproving Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82872 ("VTPM"), contingent on the City Council's approval of the rest of the requested Project entitlements.^ / / /
^ Please note that pages cited herein are either to the page's stated pagination (referenced herein as "p. ##") or the page's location in the referenced PDF document (referenced herein as "PDF p. ##"). 2 Inclusive of both Draft and Final EIR and associated findings. 2 See Planning Commission Report ("PC Repoit") (6/13/22), PDF p. 2, https://beverIyhills.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=57&clipJd=8608&meta_id=522335.

Appeal RE: Cheval Blanc Specific Plan/Hotel Project
June 23,2022

While only the VTPM was conditionally approved by Commission, this Appeal challenges all of the above-listed resolutions (collectively "Resolutions") on the grounds of non-compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the Code, as set forth below and contained in the attachments enclosed. In short, the EIR inadequately analyzes the Project's impact on traffic, vehicle miles traveled ("VMT"), air quality, greenhouse gas ("GHG"), and land use consistency. In doing so, the EIR masks significant impacts and avoids numerous feasible mitigation measures and project alternatives—particularly a project alternative with a meaningful housing component The City of Beverly Hills ("Cit/') faces a significant increase in its housing obligations with limited developable land available. Yet, this 100 percent commercial Project merely adds more commercial, retail, and hospitality uses in an area that desperately needs housing. As such, this Project puts the City further behind its Regional Housing Needs Assessment ("RHNA") housing obligations and is inconsistent with numerous goals and policies under the City's General Plan. These issues run directly against the Code-required findings necessary for the City to grant the VTPM, which was conditionally approved in error.

Until the issues discussed herein are resolved, the EIR and Project do not comply with applicable CEQA/zoning laws. We respectfully request the City grant the Appeal and withhold all Project approvals until a CEQA-compliant EIR is recirculated with consideration of more mitigation measures and project alternatives. Local 11 also reserves the right to supplement these comments and appeal points in the future.

I. STANDING
Under the Code, the VTPM is processed in the same manner as tentative maps (BHMC § 10- 2-1005), which allows "[a]ny interested person" to appeal a Commission's approval (id., § 10-2- 205; see also Gov. Code, § 66452.5(d)(1)). Here, Local 11 represents more than 25,000 workers employed in hotels, restaurants, airports, sports arenas, and convention centers throughout Southern California and Phoenix—including hundreds of members who live and/or work in the City. The union has a First Amendment right to petition public officials in connection with matters of public concern, including compliance with applicable zoning rules and CEQA, just as developers, other community organizations, and individual residents do. Protecting its members' interest in the environment, including advocating for the environmental sustainability of development projects and ensuring the availability of housing and hotels (in compliance with state and local rules), is part of Local ll's core function. Recognizing unions' interest and union members' interest in these issues, California courts have consistently upheld unions' standing to litigate land use and environmental claims. (See Bakersfield Citizens v. Bakersfield (2004) 124 CalApp.4th 1184,1198.) Furthermore, Local 11 has public interest standing to challenge the Resolutions given the City's public duty to comply with applicable zoning and CEQA laws, which Local 11 seeks to enforce. (See e.g., Rialto Citizens for Responsible Growth v. City o/Rialto (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 899,914-916, n6; La Mirada Avenue Neighborhood Assn. of Hollywood v. City of Los Angeles (2018) 22 Cal.App.5th 1149,1158-1159; Weiss v. City of Los Angeles (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 194,205-206; Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. City ofManhattan Beach (2011) 52 Cal.4th 155,166,169-170.) Thus, Local 11 is an interested person with standing to bring the Appeal.

Ill
Appeal RE: Cheval Blanc Specific Plan/Hotel Project
June 23,2022

II. GROUNDS FOR APPEAL
This Appeal challenges the Resolutions and VTPM conditional approval on the grounds of non-compliance with CEQA and the Code, as set forth and fully discussed in the attached comment . letters: (i) Local ll's Draft EIR comment letter dated November 1,2021 ("Local 11 .Comments"); (ii) traffic expert Norman L. Marshall comment letter dated June 21,2022 ("Expert Traffic Comments"); and (iii) air quality/greenhouse gas ("GHG") experts Matt Hagemari and Paul E.

Rosenfeld (i.e., SWAPE) comment letter dated June 21,2022 ("Expert SWAPE Comments") {attached hereto as Exhibits A through C. respectively). This Appeal incorporates these comment letters in their entirety, as well as the entirety of the record. For the sake of brevity, we summarize here the multiple CEQA and Code issues discussed in the referenced comment letters and which form the basis of this Appeal. Local 11 reserves the right to supplement these appeal grounds in the future.

A. Contrary To CEQA, The EIR Understates The Project's Traffic Impacts Here, the EIR's traffic analysis that underlies the Resolutions and Project approvals is fundamentally flawed. These errors were raised repeatedly by Local 11, including the following:

1. The EIR fails to conduct an adequate vehicle mile traveled ("VMT") analysis by qualitatively screening out the Project, which is a departure from ±e CEQA Guidelines and the State's Office of Policy and Research VMT Guidance, and ignores numerous factors showing the Project will have a significant VMT impact. (See Local 11 Comments, pp. 2-9 [section II.A].)

2. The EIR utilizes a flawed Level of Service ("LOS") analysis, relying on unsupported assumptions related to club patrons, trip rates, use of public transit, and the like. (Id., at pp. 9-10 [section II.B].)

3. Due to the above-mentioned errors, the EIR precluded further consideration of feasible traffic mitigation, such as more aggressive commitments to public transit incentives and local hiring. (Id., at pp. 10-11 [section II.C].) These concerns are further supported by comments submitted by traffic expert Mr.

Marshall in Exhibit B attached hereto, which include the following findings:

4. The EIR improperly screened the Project from a complete VMT analysis under the false assumption that all projects in a Transit Priority Area should be exempted. (See Expert Traffic Comments, pp. 1-2 [section 1].)

5. The EIR makes false claims that the Project design reduces VMT significantiy when the design would reduce VMT by only a meager 2.5 percent per California Air Pollution and Control Officers Association ("CAFCOA") guidance. (Id., at pp. 1,3-4 [section 2].)

6. The EIR fails to disclose that the Project relies on transit network companies ("TNC(s)") (e.g., Uber & Lyft) and, thus, significantly understates the Project's VMT generation. (Id., at pp. 2,4 [section 3].)

7. The Project would exacerbate jobs/housing imbalance for service workers, inducing longer commutes well beyond the EIR's assumptions. (Id., at pp. 2,4-5 [section 4].)

8. The Project would create additional service jobs without a sure path to providing a fair share of workforce housing per the City's approved Regional Housing Needs Assessment ("RHNA") plan. (Id., at pp. 2,5-6 [section 5].) Appeal RE: Cheval Blanc Specific Plan/Hotel Project
June 23,2022

Local 11 also incorporates the comments made by traffic experts at KOA Corporation on behalf of local businesses and commenters, which highlight the inadequacies in the ElR's traffic analysis related to:

9. On-site circulation and access;.::"

10. Trip generation; and

11. Parking demand.^
B. Contrary to CEQA, the EIR's Air Quality Analysis Is Deficient Here, the EIR's air quality analysis is fundamentally flawed. These errors were raised in 2021 by Local 11 (see Local 11 Comments, pp. 11-13 [section 111]), including the following:

1. The EIR's modeling has substantial changes to CalEEMod default values without adequate justification (e.g., reducing CO2 intensity factors, changes to work trips, assumed building efficiencies, etc.), which results in an underestimation of the Project's emissions;

2. The EIR's modeling does not adequately consider and assess overlapping phased construction; and

3. The EIR's modeling improperly gives credit for a variety of mitigation measures inconsistent with CAPCOA guidance.

These concerns are further supported by environmental experts Mr. Hageman and Mr.

Rosenfeld of SWAPE, as set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto, who found:

4. The EIR uses unsubstantiated input parameters to estimate Project emissions, such as: (i) individual construction phase lengths; (ii) off-road construction equipment unit amounts and usage hours; (iii) reductions of hauling trip numbers; (iv) reductions in construction trip lengths; and (v) overestimated reduction to energy use value. (See Expert SWAPE Comments, pp. 1-10.)

5. SWAPE's updated analysis, with proper input parameters, indicates potentially significant NOx emissions that exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District ("SCAQMD") thresholds. (Id., at pp. 10-11.)

6. The EIR fails to properly evaluate risks from diesel particulate matter ("DPM"), which will increase as a result of the Project and which therefore warrants a more thorough Health Risk Assessment ("HRA"). (Id., at pp. 11-13.)

7. SWAPE's screening-level analysis (i.e., AERSCREEN) demonstrates the Project poses a significant exposure to excess cancer risks. (Id., at pp. 13-16.) Ill
^ See PC Report, supra fn. 3, pp. 274-281.

Appeal RE: Cheval Blanc Specific Plan/Hotel Project
June 23,2022

C. Contrary to CEQA, the Project's GHG Impact is Understated Here, the HIP'S GHG analysis is also flawed. These errors were raised by Local 11 in its comments (see Local 11 Comments, pp. 13-23 [section IV]), including the following:

1. . The ElR's qualitative analysis fails to rely on a proper GHG reduction plan with binding, enforceable measures specific to local land-use projects—as required under the CEQA Guidelines. (Id., at pp. 13-14 [subsection A].)

2. The EIR overstates the Project's purported sustainable features by primarily relying on compliance with existing regulations (e.g.. Title 24) and fails to adequately consider the area's housing/job imbalance or the inconsistency with smart growth principles by adding a 100 percent commercial Project in an area oversaturated with commercial, retail, and similar uses. (Id., at pp. 14-15 [subsection B].)

3. The ElR's consistency analysis with the Southern California Association of Government ("SCAG") 2020 RTP/SCS plan is lacking because it: (i) primarily relies on regulatoiy measures that are not specific to local land use projects (e.g., Cap-andTrade, Renewables Portfolio Standard, Low Carbon Fuel Standards, etc.) and ignores numerous project-level mitigation measures proffered by SCAG; (ii) fails to consider relevant performance benchmarks (e.g., VMT per capita, lbs/day of GHG emissions); and (iii) fails to recognize that—according to the California Air Resources Board ("CARE")—compliance with SB 375 and the VMT reductions anticipated by under the RTP/SCS is not enough for the State to meet its longer-term GHG reduction goals. (Id., at pp. 15-20 [subsection C.1- C.3].)

4. The ElR's consistency analysis with CARB's 2017 Scoping Plan is also insufficient because the EIR: (i) relies largely on older Scoping Plans; (ii) fails to consider project-specific mitigation applicable to local land use projects; and (iii) ignores quantitative analysis showing the Project's annual GHG emission would exceed SCAQMD-recommended screening thresholds and efficiency standards. (Id., at pp. 20-22 [subsection D.l - D.3].)
These concerns are further supported by experts Mr. Hageman and Mr. Rosenfeld of SWAPE, as set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto, who found:

5. The ElR's quantitative GHG analysis relies on unsubstantiated data inputted into CalEEMod (discussed supra). (See Expert SWAPE Comments, pp. 17-18 [referring to comments on pp. 1-10].)

6. The EIR should have used more applicable GHG thresholds, such as SCAQMD's 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MTC02e/year, which this Project exceeds at 8.0 MTCOze/year. (Id., at pp. 18-19.)

7. The EIR failed to consider SB 375 performance-based standards, such as: (i) passenger & light-duty VMT per capita benchmarks under CARB's 2017 Scoping Plan; (ii) per capita GHG emission goals under SCAG's RTP/SCS; or (iii) daily VMT per capita targets also under SCAG's RTP/SCS. (Id., at pp. 19-21.)

8. Due to these errors, the EIR precluded consideration of numerous mitigation measures. (Id., at pp. 21-27.)
Ill
Appea! RE: Cheval Blanc Specific Plan/Hotel Project
June 23,2022

D. Contrary to CEQA, the EIR Failed to Consider a Housing-Alternative That Would be Consistency with Housing and Land Use Goals/Policies and Reduce Project Impacts As Local 11 pointed out in 2021, the City is facing a significant increase in its RHNA housing obligation with limited developable land available. (See Local 11 Comments, pp. 22-23 [section V].) Yet, the Project adds more commercial/retail uses in an area already saturated with commercial/retail/hospitality uses. In failing to consider a project alternative with a meaningful housing component (particularly affordable), this Project:

1. Places the City further behind its RHNA goals and forgoes significant VMT/GHG reductions by addressing the area's job/housing imbalance (id.);

2. Is inconsistent with numerous Housing/Land Use goals and policies under the City's General Plan (e.g., LU 1, LU 2.2, LU 9.1, LU 14, LU16.4,0S7, H2.9) (id. at pp. 23-24 [section VI]); and

3. Fails to consider an adequate range of project alternatives that would reduce significant Project impacts—as required under CEQA (id., at pp. 24-25 [section VII]).

E. The Commission Granted the VTPM contrary to the Code-Required Findings To grant the VTPM and approvals that are the subject of the Resolutions, the City must make numerous findings under applicable law. However, the above-mentioned CEQA deficiencies run directly against many of these findings, including the Project being: (i) inconsistent with the applicable General Plan; (ii) likely to cause substantial environmental damage; (iii) cause serious public health problems; and (iv) conflict with public use and access of the Site. (See BHMC §§ 10-2- 205.B, 10-2-1002; see also Gov. Code §§ 66473.5,66474.) Therefore. Local 11 submits this Appeal of the VTPM, approvals, and CEQA findings and determinations.

III. CONCLUSION
As discussed above and in the attached comment letters, there are serious issues regarding the EIR's and Project's compliance with applicable CEQA/zoning laws. We respectfully request the City grant the Appeal and withhold all Project approvals until the issues discussed herein are addressed in a recirculated EIR with more mitigation measures and project alternatives considered and a complete analysis of traffic, air quality, and GHG impacts. The City faces a significant increase in its housing obligations with limited developable land available. Yet, the Project merely adds more commercial uses with no consideration of a project alternative with a meaningful and environmentally sound housing component Thank you for consideration of these comments. We ask that this letter be placed in the administrative record for the Project Sincerely,
Jord^ R. Sisson-^
Attachments:

Exhibit A: Local 11 Comments (11/1/21)
Exhibit B: Expert Traffic Comments (6/21/22)
Exhibit C: Expert SWAPE Comments (6/21/22)

EXHIBIT A
Law
801 South Grand Avenue. 11 th Floor
Los Angeles, Calitbmia 90017
(213) 629-2071 | Fax: (213) 623-7755
www.gideonlaw.net
Jordan R. Sisson
Direct: 213-629-2071 ext. 1102
E-mail: [email protected]
Land Use, Environmental & Municipal Lawyers
November 1, 2021
VIA EMAIL:

Masa Alkire, AICP, Principal Planner
City of Beverly Hills
Planning Division
Community Development Department
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
[email protected]
RE: Draft EIR Comments on Cheval Blanc Specific Plan (SCH No. 2020110223) Dear Mr. Alkire:

On behalf of UNITE HERE Local 11 ["Local 11"), this Office respectfully provides the following comments^ to the City of Beverly Hills ["City") regarding the Draft Environmental Impact Report ["DEIR")2 for a 212,034 square feet ["SF") mixed-use building at the above-referenced

1.277-acre location ["Site") that is proposed to be 109-115 guest room luxuiy hotel, including a penthouse, private club, wellness center, spa, restaurants and retail use ["Project").

The Project contemplates various land use approvals pursuant to the Beverly Hills Municipal Code ["BHMC" or "Code"), including: [i) a Zoning Map and Zone Text Amendment to create the Cheval Blanc Specific Plan, [ii) a General Plan Amendment designating the Project Site as the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Specific Plan, [iii) a Development Agreement to provide for vested development rights and certain community benefits in connection with the Project, [iv) Amendment to the Master Plan of Streets to relocate the existing surface right-of-way for public alley purposes and to dedicate additional surface right-of-way for public sidewalk purposes along South Santa Monica Boulevard and allow public roadway along North Rodeo Drive and South Santa Monica Boulevard to remain in their current locations, [v) A Vesting Tentative Parcel Map to merge the existing contiguous lots and relocate the surface right-of-way of the public alley, [vi) Encroachment Permits, and [vii) all other approvals, as necessary [collectively "Entitiements").

Additionally, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Pub. Res. Code § 21000 et seq., ["CEQA"),3 the Project seeks approval of the EIR and associated environmental findings/approvals.

As discussed below. Local 11 is concerned about the Project's compliance with CEQA. In short, the DEIR fails to adequately assess the Project's traffic impacts—both vehicle miles traveled ["VMT") and level of service ["LOS"), and greenhouse gas ["GHG") impacts. The DEIR mischaracterized the Project to shortcut VMT and other environmental review - this is a 100 ^ Page citations contained herein are to the page's stated pagination [referenced herein as "p. #"), or to the page's location in the referenced PDF document [referenced herein as "PDF p. #"). 2 Inclusive of all appendices ["APP-##") documents retrieved from City's Project website. [See http://www. beverlvhills.org/departments/communitvdevelopment/environmentalreportsanddocuments/. 3 Including "CEQA Guidelines" codified at 14 Cal. Code. Regs. § 15000 et seq.

DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

percent commercial development without a single residential unit and, thus, is not a genuine mixed-use project consistent with smart growth principles. Additionally, the Project's failure to consider any housing at this unique Site puts the City behind the proverbial eight-ball in terms of every meeting its affordable housing obligations (i.e.. Regional Housing Needs Assessment ["RHNA"]). These and other flaws in the DEIR mask the Project's genuine impacts, which infects the DElR's consideration of mitigation measures and project alternative analysis. So too, these issues directly conflict with various goals and objectives under the City's General Plan and, thus, run against Code-required findings necessary for granting the Entitlements.

Until the issues discussed herein are resolved. Local 11 respectfully urges the City to stay any actions on the Entitlements and DEIR (collectively "Project Approvals"). A CEQA-compliant DEIR should be recirculated—with updated emissions modeling under the most current CalEEMod modeling and a study of alternatives including housing—and subject to public review.

I. LOCAL ll'S STANDING
Local 11 represents more than 25,000 workers employed in hotels, restaurants, airports, sports arenas, and convention centers throughout Southern California and Phoenix—including members who live and/or work in the City. The union has a First Amendment right to lobby public officials in connection with matters of public concern, like compliance with applicable zoning rules and CEQA, just as developers, other community organizations, and individual residents do.

Protecting its members' interest in the environment and the availability of housing is part of Local ll's core function. Recognizing unions' interest in these issues, California courts have consistently upheld unions' standing to litigate land use and environmental claims. (See Bakersfield Citizens v.

Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184,1198.) Furthermore, Local 11 has public interest standing given the Project Approvals relates to the City's public duty to comply with applicable zoning and CEQA laws, and where Local 11 seeks to have that duty enforced. (See e.g., Rialto Citizens for Responsible Growth v. City of Rialto (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 899,914-916, n6; La Mirada Avenue Neighborhood Assn. of Hollywood v. City of Los Angeles (2018) 22 Cal.App.5th 1149,1158-1159; Weiss V. City of Los Angeles (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 194,205-206; Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. City of Manhattan Beach (2011) 52 Cal.4th 155,166,169-170.)

11. THE DEIR UNDERSTATES THE PROJECT'S TRAFFIC IMPACTS
A. The DEIR Arbitrarily Screens The Project OUT OF VMT Analysis Here, the Draft EIR fails to provide a VMT analysis for the Project. Instead, citing the City's Local CEQA VMT Thresholds of Significance Guidelines ("City VMT Guidelines"),'^ the DEIR qualitatively screened the Project's VMTs from any further analysis because it was "presumed" that the Project's retail component is local serving (i.e.. Screening Criteria 2) and that the entire project is within a Transit Priority Area ("TPA") (i.e.. Screening Criteria 4). (DEIR, p. 4.9-28 - 4.9-29; APP-H, PDF pp. 35-39.) Yet, this presumption of less than significance is not warranted and inconsistent with the Office of Policy and Research ("OPR") Technical Advisoiy on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA ("Technical Advisory")
* City (10/10/19) City VMT Guidelines (inclusive of documents attached thereto), https://beverlyhills. granicus.com/MetaViewer.php7view id=S7&clip id=6789&meta id=410583. 5 OPR (Dec. 2018) Technical Advisory, http://opr.ca.gov/docs/20190122-743 Technical Advi.sorv.pdf.

DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

1. The DEIR Departs from The CEOA Guidelines and OPR VMT Guidance CEQA Guidelines § 15064.3 and OPR's Technical Advisory have served as the primary documents guiding local governments in evaluating VMT impacts under SB 743. The DEIR suggests its improper application of the screening thresholds is consistent with, based on, and relies on these . . key authorities.^ This is incorrect for several reasons:
a. The Qualitative Analysis Not Appropriate for Hotel Projects Requiring Greater Analysis
First, the DEIR uses a qualitative Screening Criteria 2 (i.e., local serving retail < 50,000 square feet) and Screening Criteria 4 (i.e., any project within % mile of TFA) to find less than significant VMT impacts. However, CEQA Guidelines § 15064.3(c) allows a qualitative analysis when "existing models or methods are not available" (emph. added). Here, the City VMT Guidelines acknowledge that VMT per service population can be reported for "large-scale retail projects or other project types, such as special event venues and hotels." (PDF p. 36 [emphasis added].) The City VMT Guidelines states that a "VMT analysis should be customized to determine the unique trip generation and trip length characteristics" for certain other types of projects, such as a "hotel. conference center, or performing arts center...." (Id. at p. 50 [emphasis added]). Hence, a qualitative screening threshold is inappropriate when a quantitative analysis is not only available but in fact encouraaed for unique hotel projects.

Second, while referencing OPR's Technical Advisory, the DEIR suggests that Screening Criteria 4 is appropriate for any proposed use within Vi mile of a TPA. (DEIR, pp. 4.9-17 - 4.9-18,

4.9-28 - 4.9-29.) However, hotels are not mentioned anywhere in the Technical Advisory, which is limited to residential, retail, and office projects. In fact, OPR made clear that this TPA Screening Criteria and presumption of less than significance was appropriate for "certain projects (including residential, retail, and office projects, as well as projects that are a mix of these uses)...." (OPR Technical Advisory, p. 13.) Rather than less review, the City VMT Guidelines suggests hotel projects need more VMT analysis to address their unique VMT profile. (PDF pp. 36,50-51 [discussed above].) Furthermore, when the City conducted a six-project pilot study to see the effect of the screening thresholds, not a single one included a hotel use. (Id. at 55-56.) Hence, neither OPR's Technical Advisory nor the City's VMT Guidelines contemplated Screening Criteria 4 for hotel projects. b. DEIR Fails to Recognize Screening Presumption Can Be Rebutted with Substantial Evidence, Which Is Not Limited to Only Three Criteria First, the DEIR claims once a project "qualifies" under a screening criterion, the project is "screened out from further consideration." (DEIR, p. 4.9-17, - 4.9-18,4.9-28.) This suggests that a TPA project must be presumed less than significant and exempt from any VMT analysis so long as it satisfies just three criteria (i.e., greater than 0.75 floor-area-ratio, not overparked, consistent with the Southern California Association of Government ("SCAG") RTP/SCS plan). This is clearly incorrect when the DEIR admits the presumption is valid only to the extent there is "absent substantial evidence to the contrary." (Id.) While a TPA projects mav aenerallv have less ±an significant VMT impacts, the City cannot ignore proiect-specific or location-specific information indicated significant levels of VMT generated, or refuse to stay in step with evolvina scientific knowledae on this issue. (See CEQA Guidelines § 15064.3(b)(1) & (4); OPR Technical Advisory, PDF 6 See e.g., DEIR, p. 4.9-16 - 4.9-17,4.9-27,4.9-29,4.9-31; City VMT Guidelines, PDF p. 4-5,13,18.

DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

pp. 9,14-16; Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. San Diego Assn. of Governments (2017) 3 Cal.Sth 497,504.) Hence, any presumption of less than significance can be rebutted when supported by substantial evidence. -
Second, in considering the appropriateness of using Screening Criteria 4, the DEIR considers only three factors (i.e., greater than 0.75 floor-area-ratio, not overparked, consistent with SCAG RTP/SCS). However, neither the CEQA Guidelines nor OPR place a limit on the factors that should be considered. (See CEQA Guidelines § 15064.3(b)(3) ["Such a qualitative analysis would evaluate factors such as the availability of transit, proximity to other destinations, etc." Emphasis added]; OPR Technical Advisory, p. 14 ["This presumption would not apply, however, if project-specific or location-specific information indicates that the project will still generate significant levels of VMT." Listing four non-exclusive examples for consideration].) Hence, the City cannot limit its consideration to only three criteria.

2. VMT Factors Ignored bv the DEIR Show VMT Analysis Is Required Here As discussed below, the facts show that numerous factors demonstrate that this Project will have substantial VMTs and, thus, the Project in the middle of congested Beverly Hills should not be screened from a full VMT analysis.
a. This Is a Massive Hotel Project with Large Trip Generation Both OPR and the City presume small projects generating less than 110 average daily trips ("ADT(s") will have a less than significant VMT impact (OPR Technical Advisory, p. 14 [noting 110- 124 trips per 10,000 square feet office building]; City VMT Guidelines, PDF pp. 18,38.) Conversely, that rationale indicates project generating more than 110 ADTs may have a potential significant VMT impact Here, the 212,034-SF Project is expected to generate 3,503 ADTs—more than 30 times laraer than the 110 ADT criteria. (DEIR, p. ES-7; APP-H, PDF pp. 61,83-84.) h. Project Is in A Non-Low VMT Screening Location
Both OPR and the City presume certain projects in certain low-VMT locations will have a less than significant VMT impact (OPR Technical Advisory, p. 12-13; City VMT Guidelines, PDF pp.

18.) The City only has a residential low-VMT screening area because the City's employee VMT rate is not 15 percent below the regional average. (City VMT Guidelines, PDF pp. 5,18.) Here, the Project is a non-residential project located in area where the City's employee generation is not 15 percent below the regional average. (Id., PDF p. 43 [Fig. 2 Low-VMT Area Screening - Office].) c. Project Exceeds VMT Per Employee Threshold and Will Induce Long Employee Trips
First, OPR recommends a 15 percent below regional average as an appropriate threshold for residential and office projects. (OPR Technical Advisory, p. 15-16.). For the City, this threshold is

15.0 VMT per employee for home-based work trips. (APP-H, PDF p. 39; City VMT Guidelines, PDF pp. 17,51.) Here, the DEIR does not explicitly provide a VMT analysis. However, the DEIR discloses the Project would include 250 employees generating 521 ADTs. (DEIR, p. 4.1-46; APP-H, PDF p. 84.) Buried in the DEIR's appendices includes the air/GHGjnodeling emissions modeling using CalEEMod (APP-B), includes trip summary indicating employee trips are estimated at 16.60 miles DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

so the 15.0 VMT per employee for home-based work trips is exceeded (see figure below [outline in red]). (APP-B, PDF p. 105.') This fact matters for Local ll's members. - r

4.3 Trip Type information
bUes •np* lnphMpose%-
Land Use ||H.WorC-W -|.SorC.C H.Ocir(>»(W H-W«rC- H^orC^, Piimaiy Oivetted —♦Pas9.by Enclosed Padtmg with Elevatoi 1660 U6 680 o.ix) 000 000 0 0 0 HeaKhChjb 1660 840 6.S0 16.90 64.10 19.00 52 39 9
Hotel 16.60 840 690 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
QuaUy Restaimuii 1660 840 690 1200 6900 1900 38 18 44
Ship Mail 1660 840 690 16.60 64.40 19.00 45 40 15
d. This Redevelopment Project Triples Existing VMTs
For redevelopment projects, OPR recommends a presumption of less than significant whennet overall VMTs decreases but further analysis when it increases net overall VMTs. (OPR Technical Advisory, pp. 17-18.) Here, the Project will generate 2.495 million annual (6,836 daily) VMTs compared to the existing uses estimated to generate 0.812 million annual (2,227 daily) VMTs. (Compare APP-B, PDF p. 104 [Tbl. 4.2 for Cheval Blanc] with PDF p. 63 [Tbl. 4.2 for existing uses].) This tripling of existing VMTs is significant.
e. This Hotel Is Inherently Regional, Non-Local Serving First, OPR distinguishes between local serving (i.e., less than 50,000 SF) versus regional serving retail and urges lead agencies to consider project-specific information like market studies, economic impact analysis that bear on customer travel behavior. (OPR Technical Advisory, pp. 16-

17.) This is because while local-serving retail my improve destination proximity (i.e., serving local community by providing underserved use), regional serving can lead to longer trips. (Id.) This issue is not limited to retail use under the City VMT Guidelines, which urges more detailed reporting of unique uses like large-scale retail, special event venues, conference centers, performing art centers, and hotels. (PDF pp. 36,50-51.) Other lead agencies have similar identified unique uses and distinguish them between local-serving versus regional serving.® Ill
7 See CalEEMod (Oct. 2017) User Guide, Appendix A, p. 21 (Modeling identifies commercial trip types including: commercial-customer ("C-C") (i.e., rip made by someone who is visiting the commercial land use to partake in the services offered by the site); commercial-work ("C-W") (i.e., trip made by someone who is employed by the commercial land use sector); and commercial-nonwork ("C-NW") (i.e., trip associated with the commercial land use other than by customers or workers like delivery vehicles).), http://www.caleemod. com/ (select "Archive", "User's Guide for CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2". ® See e.g.. City of Los Angeles fiuly 2020) Department of Transportation (LADOT) Transportation Assessment Guidelines, PDF p. 18-19,21-23 (public services, school and religious uses, event centers and regional-serving entertaihmentvenues), https://ladot.lacitv.org/sites/default/files/2020-07/ta guidelines all-seclions 2020.-

07.04 attachments.pdf: WRCOG (Feb. 2020) Updated Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, PDF pp. 55-56, 70 . (identifying local seiying schools, community centers, parks, daycare centers, non-destination hotels, etc.), https.7/wrcog.us/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/ 02132020-386: LA County Public Works (7/23/20) Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, p. 9; https://dpw.lacountv.gov/traffic/docs/Transportationlmpact-Analvsis-Guidelines-lulv-2020-vl.l.pdf.

DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

Second, unlike projects that are local serving, this Project explicitly targets global clientele and subsequently prioritizes ample private space to accommodate. It is the intended goal of the Project Developer to create a "home away from home for that global luxury travel."^ In the belowgrade parking structure, projections indicate "transient visitor cars make up 75% of cars parked" (APP-H, PDF p. 269.) This further reinforces the majority of Project benefits going to regional and global guests. Additionally, just about ten percent of the^l2,000'square feet of the Project will be open to the general public as retail. The DEIR admits that 4,760 square feet of outdoor restaurant and bar spaces on levels six and seven and the 742-SF outdoor terrace on the seventh level may be publicly accessible by reservation only, unless otherwise reserved for hotel guests or club members and their respective guests. (DEIR, PDF p. 395.) The majority of the services provided at the Project are limited to hotel guests and club members, unavailable or highly restricted to the general public.

With only a fraction of the Project being open to the public, the Project misclassifies a significant amount as local serving.

Third, unlike office projects (where majority of VMTs generated are from workers) or residential projects (where majority of VMTs generated by residents) (OPR Technical Advisory, p. 5,15-16), the majority of VMTs generated by hotel projects and other regional-serving uses are their own patrons. Nowhere in the Technical Advisory does it say that these trips can be ignored or otherwise exempted from being subject to an appropriate threshold. Furthermore, in the letter to the City as a part of the Notice of Preparation ("NOP") process, OPR noted that "due to the amount of car parking being provided, the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Specific Plan is still designed in a way that induces demand for additional vehicle trips."io
f. The Area Is Not Underserved by Hotels and Has Excess Capacity The DEIR highlights that the Business Triangle area is a marquee destination of regional tourist significance. (DEIR, PDF p. 17.) As such, the hotel, private membership club, and retail/restaurant components do function as a regional-serving use that must be considered in the VMT analysis. Moreover, with numerous hotels in the area (at least 13 according to Google Maps [see fig. below]),ii it does not appear that the area is underserved by hotels or locally-serving uses that would normally indicate a reduction in VMTs from the Project. Additionally, it appears hotel occupancies were actually dropping from 82 percent to 76 percent between 2017 - 2019 (preCOVID, which has likely reduced occupancies even more). (APP-H, PDF p. 267.) Not only is this less than the 80 percent typified by the City of Los Angeles,i2 but so too it demonstrates that there is excess hotel capacity to serve whatever local need there may be for hotel uses. ' Los Angeles Times (4/1/20) Rodeo Drive hotel planned by French luxury retailer LVMH (Quote by Amish Melwani, LVMH Inc. Roger Vincent), https://www.latimes.eom/business/story/2020-04-01/rodeo-drivehotel-planned-bv-french-luxurv-retailer-lvmh Letter from Office of Planning and Research re Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Specific Plan - Notice of Preparation: https://files.ceqanetopr.ca.gov/265903-2/attachment/3Kn6dimi2C0iKi0xwLlkAxqn5FHtidBO YHLBh5wcibZ5vnilLIgYzvlJqMBwOomeToMC5EzL9SVPYqbbHO
" See Google Maps, https://www.google.com/maps/search/hotels+near+The+Paley+Center+for+Media.+ North+Beverlv-fDrive.-fBeverlv+Hills.+CA/@34.1548296.-l.lR.4R92785.12z/data=!3ml!4bl ^2 See e.g.. City of Los Angeles (2017) Hotel Market Study, pp. 1, 5, https://d3nRaRpro7vbmx.cloudfrontnet/ cdl4/pages/2723/attachments/original/150R870241/CD14 Hotel Market Studv-2017 Full ReportFinal.pdf?1508870241: City of Los Angeles (2017) 2017 Annual Report p. 5, https://ctd.lacity.org/ sites/default/files/2017%20CTD%20Annual%20Reportpdf: HospitalityNet (Apr. 2021) COVID-19's Impact on the Los Angeles Hotel Market (hotel occupancy declined to 49% in 2020 compared to 80% in 2019). https://vyww.hospitalitvnet.org/opinion/4104106.btml.

DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

Beverly Hills Sign ^ ' ya
.T
Mil KHffS
Burton Way
.-s;. © T 1 = 1
^ " 5
^ The Cheesecake Factory
Spadena House ^ ^ \ Mastfo'sSteakhouse^ Cn'son Wjf
c
1^ RodeoDr^ ^ 01 ^ . \
\
Biifl Neiman Marcus ©
EaW ^ ^
i
y.';' 1, 1
^ m
= = South Beverly Grill ^
^ r ^ w
c
f £
5 2
a
• ~ - CB
s
Chjf!evi"o5vd 8 Ch8d«v.I;« ef#d
g. Without Any Residential Component, This Project Is Not a Genuine MixedUse Project Consistent with Smart Growth Principles Here, the DEIR's faulty qualitative analysis characterize the Project as an infill, mixed-use project near transit as encouraged by SCAG's RTP/SCS and other agencies. (DEIR, PDF pp. 363 - 364.) However, this Project has zero housing, which is a fundamental concept of smart growth/planning principles urged by California Air Pollution Control Officers Association ("CAPCOA"), OPR, SCAG, and even the City.^^ A true mixed-use project is a residential housing project along with commercial purposes. With adequate existing infrastructure the Project Site should be reevaluated for infill, dense housing to address the regional crisis. Overall, the Project is wrongly defined as a mixed-use project when no housing is included and, thus, the DEIR should be reevaluated for its housing potential.

See e.g., OPR Technical Advisory, p. 15 (noting "residential component of a mixed-use development") and p. 17 (example of mixed-use project "(e.g., residential and retail)"); CalEEMod (Nov. 2017) User Guide, p. 29 (example of mixed use project included residential), http:/ /www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/caleemod/Ol user-39-s-guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4: CAPCOA (August 2010) Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, PDF p. 173-176 ("...when residential areas are in the same neighborhood as retail and office buildings, a resident does not need to travel outside of the neighborhood to meet his/her trip needs." Emph. added. Showing examples of mixed use projects that all include residential), httD://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/capcoa-quantifving-greenhouse-gasmitigation-measures.pdf: Chappie, Karen, Loukaitou-Sideris, Anastasia, etal. (April 2017) Developing a New Methodology for Analyzing Potential Displacement, PDF pp. 253 (construction of afibrdable housing units available for homeownership in Mixed Use buildings along transit corridors.") https://ww2.arb.ca.gOv/sites/default/files/classic/research/apr/past/13-310.pdf: SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS Final Program Environmental Impact Report (PIER), p. 681, ("[T]he land use strategies included in the Plan would encourage higher density development in existing urban cores and opportunity areas which would encourage more multi- familv and/or mixed-use projects, via vertical development, instead of the traditional single-family home development..."), https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/rileattachments/fpeir connectsocal complete.pdf?1607981618: City of Beverly Hills General Plan, pp. 499, PDF - p. 41, (...Beverly Hill&.will continup to provide sites for a mix of single-family, multi-family, and mixed use housing, supported by a variety of programs to enhance affordability, to accommodate its RHNA and contribute towards addressing the growing demand for housing in the Southern California region...), httD://vyww.beverlvhills.org/cbhfiles/storage/files/6870944521688Q90786/BHHousingElementwmaps.pdf DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

h. Lack Of Nearby Affordable Housing and The DEIR's Failure to Consider JobHousing Balance/Fit Here, as discussed further below (see Section V), the City is a jobs-rich area that is facing a drastic increase in new affordable housing opportunities. Yet, the-Project will chiefly create lowpaying, service worker jobs. Combine with the acute lack of affordable housing in the region, the Project will force workers into long commutes (likely beyond just 16 miles assumed in the CalEEMod modeling}. This phenomenon, commonly referred as job-housing balance or fit, is well document and discussed further below and is critically important to Unite HERE (see Section V}.

1. The DEIR Improperly Brushed Off Inconsistencies with the RTP/SCS Both OPR and the City state a TPA screening is not appropriate when a project is inconsistent with SCAG's RTP/SCS. (OPR Technical Advisory, p. 18; City VMT Guidelines, p. 45.) The DEIR states the Project Site is designated as "mixed Residential and Commercial in the SCAGE RTP/SCS." (DEIR, p. 4.9-29.) However, as discussed above (Section lI.A.2.h), the Project includes zero residents and is not the type of mixed-use project that typifies smart growth, infill development Instead, it merely oversaturates the areas with more retail and commercial.

Furthermore, by not developing residential in this prime location, the City is placing increased demand for developing housing elsewhere, such as high-VMT areas.

Furthermore, the Project exceeds the daily VMT per service population ("sp") anticipated pursuant to SCAG's 2020 RTP/SCS. Here, the Project will generate 6,836 daily VMTs, divided by the Project's service population (250 employees),!'*^ results in a daily 27.3 VMT/sp. (APP-B, PDF p. 104 [Tbl. 4.2 for Cheval Blanc]; DEIR, p. 4.1-46.) However, under the 2016 and 2020 RTP/SCS, SCAG estimated the daily VMT/sp expected for the entire SCAG region and LA County, as summarized in the below table.is This same type of analysis was used by Eyestone (same environmental preparer of this DEIR) to show consistency with the RTP/SCS.i® If being below said threshold is substantial evidence of consistency, then exceeding threshold is substantial evidence of inconsistency. Here, the 27.3 VMT/sp for the Project exceeds all SCAG VMT metrics:

Service population is limited to only residents and employees. (See e.g., CAPCOA Qan. 2008) CEQA & Climate Change, pp. 62-64,71-72 (service population is defined as "the sum of the number of residents and the number of jobs supported by the project"), http://www.capcoa.org/wpcontent/uploads/2Q12/03/CAPCOA-White-Paper.pdf. 2016 RTP/SCS, p. 155, https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/fileattachments/f2016rtp.sc.s.pdf?1606Q%E2%80%8C05557: 2020 RTP/SCS, pp. 122,129, https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/rile.s/file-attachments/090.3fcQnnectsocal-pIan 0.pdf?1606001176. 1® See e.g., Senior Residential Community at The Bellwood (Jul. 2021) Draft EIR, PDF pp. 59-60, https://planning.lacitv.org/eir/SrRe.sidCommTheBellwood/deir/files/lV.D.%20Greenhou.se%20Gas%20Emissions.pdf: Sunset Cower Studios Enhancement Plan (May 2020) Draft EIR pp. 57-58,
https://planning.lacitv.org/eir/Sunset Gower Studios/DEIR/files/D IVF.pdf; 2143 Violet Street Project (June 2020) Draft EIR, PDF p. 571, https://planning.lacitv.Org/eir/2143VioletStreet/deir/files/D IVE.pdf Modera Argyle (April 2019), PDF p. 65, https://planning.lacitv.0rg/eir/M0deraArgvle/deir/f1les/D IVC.pdf 222 West 2"'' Project (March 2019), PDF p. 67,
https://planning.lacitv.org/eir/222West 2nd/DEIR/files/D IVD.pdf: Promenade 2035 (April 2018), PDF pp. 69-70 https://planning.lacitv.org/eir/Promenade 2035/DEIR/files/D IVD.pdf; Paseo Marina (March 2019), PDF p. 66 https://planning.lacitv.0rg/eir/Pase0Marina/DEIR/files/D IVD.pdf; 713 East Street Project (December 2018), PDF p. 63 https://planning.lacitv.org/eir/713 Ea.st 5th/DEIR/files/D IVC.pdf.

DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

SCAG-Wide
2016 RTP/SCS 2020 RTP/SCS
LA Countv
2016 RTP/SCS 2020 RTP/SCS
2012 22.8 f,;, > 21.5
2016 23.2 22.2
2020 22.4 21.4
2035 21.1 19.7
2040 20.5 18.4
2045 20.7 19.2
B. The DEIR's Los Impact Analysis Is Flawed
Here, the level of service ("LOS") analysis in the DEIR is fundamentally flawed as it relates to estimating the proposed private club, as well as other issues.

First, the assumption of the club servina only 500 members is entirely based on applicant's claim untethered to evidence. The basis of the club serving only 500 members is specious. The 500 members assumption was solely based on what the applicant's say they "expect" in terms of members and peak demand. (APP-H, PDF p. 80-81,259,262). There is absolutely no indicia that any of this was verified or subject to reasonable expectation. Nor is there anything to prevent the applicant to increase that membership beyond 500 (i.e., what is to stop applicant from increasing to 750,1000, etc.). Nor does the study account for guests of members.

Second, the proposed trip rate is widely underestimated as compared to what has been used for nearby projects. According to the DEIR, the 8,168-SF private club will generate 180 ADTS (App-H, PDF p. 28-30,249,255,257)—roughly 22.03 ADTs per thousand square feet ("KSF"). This is woefully below the trip rate for a similar private club project in nearby West Holl)wood where the CEQA document anticipated a trip rate of 55.03 ADTS per KSF.i' Third, the private club is much laraerthaniust an 8.000-SF private lounae and screenina room.

The above trip rates fail to account for the fact that the private club is not limited to just the 8,168- SF private lounge and screening room. These members will "also have access to parts of the Cheval Blanc that are shared with hotel guests, including the Wellness Center and restaurants on the 6''' and 7'h floors." (DEIR, PDF p. 77-78; App-H, PDF p. 259.) Thus, it appears that private club members would have access to nearly 30,000 SF of additional amenities, including: b"* Floor (e.g., 4,760-SF restaurant with immediate access to an approximate 14,250-SF pool and deck with cabanas and seating); 7^ Floor (i.e., 4,760-SF "private club bar" and 742-SF outdoor Terrace); and 8^ floor (The 4,924-SF health/wellness Center offering massage treatments). (DEIR, PDF pp. 15-18,21,38,77-78, 107-108.) Given the size and extent of amenities afforded, it would be unreasonable to assume that the club did not have the capacity to increase well above 500 members.

See City of West Hollywood (5/7/09) DrafLEIR for 9200 Sunset Boulevard Intensification of Use Project, PDF pp. 49,128,168,210 (18,388-SF privatexlub, anticipated to initial have 400 members but could increase up to 1,000 members after first year of operation, would generate 1,012 ADTS—roughly 55.03 ADTs per KSF.), https://www.dropboxxom/s/z39flkgcchuvxpl/Soho%2QHouse%20DEIR.pdf?dl=0. • -
DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

Fourth, other issues and deficiencies with the LOS analysis bevond the private club include:

A LOS analysis and parking study is no replacement for a VMT analysis. They deal with fundamentally different issues. For example, whether an Uber/Lyft (_i.e., defined as "TNC" in the DEIR) needs a parking space has no bearing on whether the Uber/Lyff s VMTs to the site should be ignored. So, while the DEIR assumed 50 percent of restaurant trips and 66 percent of hotel trips were from TNCs, that does not mean those VMTs do not matter. (APPH, PDF p. 84.) The DEIR tries to minimize LOS impacts via citing historic uses and traffic trips (APP-H, PDF p. 85,101 [2,144 existing ADTs]), but does not show the traffic generation calculations. This needs to be clarified to verify calculations were done correctly. • The DEIR uses hair salon (ITE 918) for the project's massage treatment spa use. (APP-H, -PDF p. 249.) This project's spa treatment in connection with a luxury hotel and private hotel does not appear to be anywhere similar to a typical hair salon one would find at a typical strip mall. This may cause underestimation of trips.
• DEIR assumed 50 percent of employees will take transit, which is unrealistic given the great lengths hotel service workers will have to travel to the Site given the lack of affordable housing in the City and area. (App-H, PDF p. 259.) This is key for Local 11. • DEIR fails to provide any data underlying its drive-n rates for luxury restaurants in Beverly Hills and Similar Communities—evidently claiming disclosure of this information is proprietary. (APP-H, PDF p. 272.)
C. Failure to Consider Feasible Traffic Mitigation
Due to the above errors, the Draft EIR incorrectly concludes the Project would have no VMT impact and, thus, requires no mitigation. As a result of this incorrect conclusion, the Project avoids numerous feasible VMT mitigation measures offered by CAPCOAi® and endorsed by the City,^' as well as other measures recommended by agencies like OPR and SCAG.20 At a minimum, the City should consider the following mitigation measures that promote public transit, reduce VMTs, increase the Project's overall efficiency, and which all have the additional benefit of further reducing the Project's mobile emissions affecting air quality and GHG emissions:
• Establish a rideshare program that includes on-site transit/rideshare information, assistance for employees to form carpool/vanpools, and gift gas cards to reward See.CAPCOA (Aug. 2010) Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, pp. 8.3/155,218>269 (listing and describing 15 measures as part of a "Commute Trip Reduction Program"), http://www.caprcoa.org/wpcontent/uploads/2010/ll/CAPC0A-Ouantification-Report-9-14-Final.pdf.

City-VMT Guidelines, PDF pp. 52. .I'x2® SCAG*(Sep. 2020) 2020 RTP/SCS Connect SoCal Addendum, pp. 4.0-21 - 4.0-22 (noting "employer trip reduction measures" and "commute trip reduction marketing"), https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/Fileattachments/fpeir connectsocal addendum 4 mitigationmeasure.s.pdf?1606004420.

DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

participation, and other measures consistent with CAPCOA VMT reduction measures.^i Local 11 strongly favors this.
• Establish a local hire program with a goal of 40 percent of total full/part-time jobs are held by local residents. r ; ^
• Free LA Metro day pass to hotel guests (upon request). • Increase the number of electric vehicle parking spaces with actual chargers in-place. • Require the Project achieve CalGreen Tier 1 or 2 compliance.

III. THE DEIR'S AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS IS DEFICIENT
The DEIR CalEEMod outputs in Appendix B,pf the DEIR do not represent a proper analysis.

There are multiple problems. 22
First, the DEIR relies on an older CalEEMod (version 2016.3.2), which has been updated (version 2020.4.0). This newer version has significant updates that are not reflected in the older version, such as the California Air Resources Board ("CARB")'s EMFAC2017 emissions, ITE trip generations under the 10^ edition, 2019 Tide 24 regulations, utility intensity factors for GHG emissions, to name a few.23 These are important changes and the Project should be subject to an updated CalEEMod modeling run.

Second, the 002 intensity was substantial reduced from the CalEEMod default (older version) of 702.44 Ib/MWh down to 364 Ib/MWhr (APP-B, PDF p. 85), which is well below the 393 Ib/MWhr default value under the newer CalEEMod version that includes 2021 updates to SoCal Edison GHG emissions.24 The DEIR claims that this adjustment was necessary to account for increase in SoCal Edison's renewable energy from 8 percent in 2007 (CalEEMod default) to the expected 50 percent in 2026 (assumed compliance with SB2x and SB 100). (Id.; see also DEIR, p. 4.6-53.) However, the DEIR in die same paragraph notes that the SoCal Edison was already achieving a 48 percent renewable profile in 2019 (id.), which was revised to 51 percent according to SoCal Edison's 2020 Sustainability Report.25 Thus, SoCal Edison could have stopped making any further progress on its renewable profile and maintain the same intensity factor (which is reflected in the current CalEEMod at 393 Ib/MWhr). Additionally, that 2020 report shows that 2020 saw a sharp decrease in SoCal Edison's renewable energy percentage, which would be contrary to straight line interpolation, especially when current data is readily available and verified by CAPCOA (the agency responsible for updates to the CalEEMod) and the operation year of the Project is merely four years out
21 2016 RTP/SCS, p. 155, https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/f2016rtpscs.pdf716060%E2 %90%8C05557; 2020 RTP/SCS, pp. 122,129. https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/0903 fconnectsocal-plan 0.pdf?1606001176.
22 All changes to CalEEMod defaults must be justified. (See CalEEMod User Guide, pp. 2,9, http://www.aq md.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/user-guide-2021/fil user-39-s-guide2020-4-0.pdf?sfvrsn=6. 23 CalEEMod, FAQs, http://www.caleemod.com/. -
24 CalEEMod (May 2021) User Guide, Appendix D, p. D-2 (select "User's Guide"), http://www.caleemod.com/. 25 SoCal Edison (june 2021) Edison International 2020 Sustainability Report PDF p. 40. https://www.edi.son. com/content/dam/eix/documents/su.stainabilitv/eix-2020-sustainabilitv-reportpdf: see also https://news room.edison.eom/releases/edison-international-launches-2020-sustainabilitv-report-publishes-sustainablefinancing-framework-in-alignment-with-clean-energv-strategv.

DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

Third, the CalEEMod shows workday and weekend trips were substantially changed (APP-B, PDF p. 87). (See figure below.) While the DEIR states "see trip generation" (id. at p. 85), it is unclear what trip generations is being relied upon. Moreover, as discussed above, the trip generation relies on a parking study that is entirely unreliable. Furthermore, a parking study does not serve the purpose of a VMT analysis, which is concerned with the number and distances of miles-traveled-^" not the amount of parking needed at the Project Site. The unjustified changing of these trips infects the entire mobile emissions analysis.
tbiVehicteTrtps ST_TR 20.87 6.34
tbiVehideTrlps ST_TR 8.19 8.38
tbIVehideTrtps ST_TR 94.36 87.96
tbiVehideTdps ST_TR 4Z04 35.81
tbiVehideTitps SU_TR 26.73 8.12
tbiveltideltfps SU_TR 5.95 6.09
tbiVettideTrtps SU_TR 72.16 6726
tbiVe{iideTt4>s SU_7R 20.43 17.40
tbiVetUdeTrfps WD_TR 32.93 10.00
tuventdeTrtps WD_TR 8.17 636
tUVebtdeTtips WD_TR 89.95 83.84
Fourth, the CalEEMod inputs continue to be misleading, as the DEIR analysis on building enerav usaae included a "10-percent reduction in the CalEEMod calculated energy use to account for compliance with 2019 Title 24 standards." (DEIR, p. 278.) However, the Project fails to bind itself to any such requirements, stating that the Project "may include use of efficient water heaters, cooking equipment, and other major support appliances [in order to meet the Title 24 energy performance requirement]" (Id.) Moreover, all of this could be avoided by updated the CalEEMod with the 2019 Title 24 regulations already accounted for in the CAPCOA-vetted modeling.

Fifth, the Project involves two phases of construction, with plans to commence in 2022 and Construction of Phase 2 would overlap Phase 1 by approximately 1.5 months. (DEIR, p. 4.6-68; APPA, PDF p. 23; APP-B, PDF p. 89 [Phase 1 Building Construction overlapping with Phase 2 Demolition]; APP-E, p. 7 [showing Phase 2 activity during Phase 1 construction].) However, the CalEEMod modeling does not show any overlapping construction phase where some emissions from Phase 1 and Phase 2 would overlap. This may cause air emissions during this period to be much larger than what is disclosed. This would also impact the potential for toxic air contaminants.

The failure to consider overlapping phases is a fundamental error that requires correction via an updated CalEEMod run. So too, it is unclear if construction noise analysis/modeling accounted for this concurrent construction, which also must be corrected. (DEIR, p. 457 [Tbl. 4.8-12].) Sixth, the above modeling error and questionable assumptions infects the entire emissions modelina. This forms the basis of the DEIR's air quality and GHG impact analysis, which must be reassessed pursuant to an accurate updated modeling under the newer CalEEMod version. So top/ the DEIR's noise analysis must be reassessed to consider overlapping noise construction activities.

Ill
DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

Seventh, in an effort to reflect purported sustainable features of the Project, the modeling improperly took credit for a variety of mitigation measures (APP-B, PDF pp. 104) that correspond to various CAPCOA mitigation measures.^® However, as discussed below (Section IV.B), many of these measures do not apply to the Project For example,.for "Increase Diversity" (LUT-S),^' CAPCOA shows that this measure is most effective when there is a diversity of housing in combination with a diversity in other commercial uses. Here, this Projeetis 100 percent commercial, is already surrounded by numerous restaurants and other hotels, but has zero housing.

IV. GHG IMPACTS ARE UNDERSTATED
Citing CEQA Guidelines § 15064(h)(3), the DEIR's qualitative GHG analysis relies on the Project's consistency with CARB's 2017 Scoping Plan, SCAG's RTP/SCS, and the City's Sustainable City Plan to determine less than significant GHG impacts. (DEIR, p. 342.) This is incorrect for several reasons.

A. DEIR Fails To Recognize That Plans Must Include Specific, Binding, And Enforceable Measures Specific to Local Land-Use Projects
First, the DEIR fails to recognize that local GHG reduction CAP plans must include specific, binding, and en forceable measures specific to local land-use pro jects to be applicable under the CEQA Guidelines § 15064 (DEIR, p. 4.6-41.)28 Under subdivision (h)(3), lead agencies can find projects not cumulatively considerable for GHG when a project complies with an approved plan or mitigation program that "provides specific requirements that will avoided or substantially lessen the cumulative problems within the geographic area in which the project is located ... [and] the lead agency should explain how implementing the particular requirements in the plan, regulation or program ensure that the project's incremental contribution to the cumulative effect is not cumulatively considerable." (Emphasis added). When adopted, the Resources Agency explained that this subsection provides a "rebuttable presumption" for "certain" plans, such as local Climate Action Plans ("CAP(s)").29 As further explained, "consistency with plans that are purely aspirational fi.e.. those that include only unen forceable aoals without mandatory reduction measures), and provide no assurance that emissions within the area governed bv the plan will actually address the cumulative problem, may not achieve the level of protection necessary to give rise to this subdivision's presumption."2o (Emphasis added.) Hence, lead agencies must "draw a link between the project and the speciHc provisions of a binding plan or regulation." before subdivision (h)(3) rebuttable presumption is to take effect^i
Here, none of the plans cited by the DEIR are a proper CAP, which must include projectspecific measures and features that are project-specific, mandatory, tethered to quantifiable data, and directly serves to reduce the local projects' contribution to GHG emissions. As discussed further below, the DEIR cites to actions and proposals that are purely aspirational and non-binding on the 26 CalEEMod (Nov. 2017) User Guide, pp. 55 -65, http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemQd/01 u ser-39-s-guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4.
22 CAPCOA, Quantifying GHG Mitigation Measures, PDF p/174-177, http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/ceqa/handbook/capcoa-quantifving-greenhous^-ga.s-mitigation-measures.pdf. 2® McCann v. City of San Diego (2021) 70 CalApp.5th 51,96. 29 Resources Agency (Dec. 2009) Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action: Amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines, pp. 14-15, http://resources.ca.gov/ceqa/docs/Final Statement of Reasons.pdf. 30 Ibid., pp. 16,65.
31 Ibid., p. 16.

DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

Project—thus, the analysis fails to draw the required link warranting the rebuttable presumption i afforded under Section 15Q64(h)(3).

For example, the City of Beverly Hills Sustainable City Plan ("Sustainable City Plan") wasadopted in 2009;ibut fails to be a CEQA-compliant, qualified CAP.32 It lacks any of the hallmarks of a. qualified CAP that-ensures^jlHG reductions, such as: i) inventorying existing and future GHG emissions within the City; ii) establishing a numeric limit of total GHG emission for the City; iii) identifying specific mitigation measures with performance standards that can be implemented on a project-by-project basis that would achieve the City limit; iv) creating a monitoring program to ensure the CAP's efficacy for the City to reach its limit; and v) subject to CEQA review. (See CEQA Guidelines § 15183.5(b)(1).)
Additionally, the Sustainable City Plan does not mandate any specific actions, but rather provides a list of potential programs and the foundation on which the City can build a unified sustainability strategy. The Sustainable City Plan places no mandatory requirements on the Project, but rather represents the aspirations of the community to become more sustainable. This is not a valid CAP allowing a qualitative-only consistency analysis for GHGs.

B. Purported Sustainable Features Are Overblown and Fail To Demonstrate Additionality
Much of the Project's purported sustainability features are overblown, particularly as it relates to claims of going beyond what is already required for state and regional requirements. The Project Design Features as outlined in the DEIR are not specific or binding, and no actual quantifications are outlined (p. 4.6-50 - 4.6-51), for example:
• The Project touts itself for achieving LEED Silver energy efficiency requirements, which essentially is the minimum of the 2019 California Building Energy Efficiency Standards and the requirements of the CalGreen Building Code. ^3
• The Project has failed to outline the percentage of Energy Star-labeled projects. • The Project has not specified a percentage of electric vehicle ("EV") spaces or EV infrastructure for the subterranean parking structure.
• While the Project promises to make investments in pedestrian infrastructure, the Project will attract patrons from around the state and globe, creating substantial increases in VMT from hotel guests. This will result in the Project being the antithesis of sustainability and inconsistent with fundamental smart growth strategies advocated by relevant agencies (e.g., SCAG, CARB, CAPCOA, and OPR).^^
32 See City of Beverly Hills Sustainable City Plan, https://www.beverlvhills.org/cbhFiles/storage/Files/ 24347783778629768/SustainableCitvPlan.pdf.
33 Compare DEIR,pp. 44.32 with CalGreen Building Code 2019. https://calgreenenergvservices.com/wp/wpcontent/uploads/2019 California green code.pdf. 34 See e.g., SCAG (Apr. 2016) 2016 RTP/SCS, pp. 25, 58,78 (reducing parking requirements), https://scag.ca.. gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/f2016rtpscs.pdf?1606005557: CARB (Nov. 2017) 2017 Scoping Plan-, Appendix B, p. 3 (reduce parking requirements), p. 8 (install fewer on-site parking spaces than required), - https://ww2.arb.ca.gOv/sites/default/files/classic/cc/scopingplan/2030sp_appb_localaction_final.pdf; DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

• While the Project Site may provide a variety of uses (e.g., retail, hotel guest rooms, club member area, restaurant, etc.), these uses are relatively abundant in the surrounding area— especially hotels (seemingly 13 with roughly one mile of the Site).35 This contradicts the DEIR's proposition that the Project would accomplish GAPCOA Measure LUT-S—Increase Diversity of Urban and Suburban Developments (MixedsUses).^® The facts is visitors already • have ample opportunities to shop, dine, or stay at another hotel within walking distance. To the contrary, the City and this area are, however, undei served by affordable housing— which this Project provides none.^? Thus, the Project fails to maximize the Site's mixed-use potential by providing diversity of uses needed in the area. Furthermore, under the DEIR's rationale, a 99 percent office project with one percent of retail should claim complete credit from being technically mixed-use. This is nonsense.

C. SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS Is LACKING IN THE DEIR

1. The DEIR Offers Onlv Perfunctory Consistency Evaluation To Non-Specific. NonBindina Plans As discussed above, the rebuttable presumption allowing qualitative GHG consistency analysis afforded under CEQA Guidelines § 15064^)(3) applies only when actions in the relevant GHG plans are specific, binding, and not merely aspirational. Here, however, SCAG has made it clear that the RTP/SCS is "non-binding" on local govemments.^s Additionally, the cited mandatory regulatory measures are not Project-specific (e.g., Cap-and-Trade, Renewables Portfolio Standard, Low Carbon Fuel Standards, etc.). (DEIR, p. 4.6-53 - 4.6-54 [Tbl. 4.6-5].) These are entirely the responsibility of state and regional agencies to adopt regulations that the Project cannot claim credit for. For example, GARB has stated it would be "misguided" to suggest Cap-and-Trade or other state regulations covers mobile emissions from local land-use projects.^^ Ill
GAPCOA (Aug. 2010) Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, pp. 155, 207-209 (measures PDT-1 Limit Parking Supply whereby "The project will change parking requirements and types of supply within the project site to encourage "smart growth" development and alternative transportation choices by project residents and employees."), http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-soiirce/ceqa/handbook/capcoaquantifying-greenhouse-gas-mitigation-measures.pdf; OPR (Dec. 2018) TECHNICAL ADVISORY—On Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA, p. 14 (presumption of less than significant VMT impact for projects near transit might not be appropriate for projects that "Includes more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than required by the jurisdiction (if the jurisdiction requires the project to supply parking".), p. 27 (measures to reduce VMTs include "limit or eliminate parking supply"), https://opr.ca.gOv/ceqa/docs/20190122-743_Technical_Advisory.pdf.

DEIR, PDF pp. 106-109 (Related Projects, Table 3.0-1,4,18,24, 36,40,41). 36 DEIR, PDF pp. 161-163, pp. 4.1-47-49.
3' The City affordable housing crises is well known. The City has routinely failed to meet objective affordable housing obligations to meet regional demand or as a part of the Regional Housing Need Allocation. (See October 2020 appeal letter, https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/filerattachments/beverlvhills-rhna-appealrequest.pdf?1604954426.) 38 See e.g., SCAG (Apr. 2016) 2016 RTP/SCS, PDF p. 70, http://scagrtpscs.net/Documents/2016/final/ f2016RTPSCS.pdf: SCAG (Apr. 2016) 2016 RTP/SCS Program EIR Response to Comments, PDF p. 85, http://scagrtpscs.net/Documents/2016/peir/final/Final RTC032816.pdf. 39 CARB (12/5/18) RE Centennial Specific Plan Final EIR, p. 3-4,6-7,10-11, https: / /ww3.arb.ca.gov/ toxics/ttdceqalist/centennialfeir.pdf.
40 2020 RTP/SCS (9/3/20) Program EIR, MMRP, pp. 6-11, 25-29,44-50. https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/ file-attachments/exhibit-a connectsocal peir revisedmmrp.pdf?1606004474: SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS (Apr. 2016) PEIR MMRP, pp. 15-19,28-29, 31-33, https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-atAachments/2016f peir exhibitb mmrp.pdf?1623887711.
41 See e.g.. Senior Residential Community at The Bellwood Qul. 2021) Draft EIR, PDF pp. 59-60, https://plann ing.lacitv.org/eir/SrResidComm-TheBellwood/deir/files/IV■D■0^20Greenhouse0^20Gas0^2QEmissions■pdf:

Sunset Gower Studios Enhancement Plan-(May 2020) Draft EIR pp. 57-58, https://planning.lacitv.org/eir/ Sunset Gower Studios/DEIR/files/D IVF.pdf: 2143 Violet Street Project (June 2020) Draft EIR, PDF p. 571, https://planning.lacitv.0rg/eir/2143Violet:Street/deir/files/D IVE.pdf: Modera Argyle (April 2019), PDF p.

65. https://planning.lacitv.Org/eir/ModeraArgvIe/deii7files/D IVC.pdf: 222 West 2'"i Project (March 2019), PDF p. 67, https://planning.lacitv.org/eir/222West 2nd/DElR/files/D IVD.pdf; Promenade 2035 (April 2018), PDF pp. 69-70 https://planning.lacitv.org/eir/Promenade 2035/DEIR/files/D IVD.pdf; Paseo Marina (March 2019), PDF p. 66 https://planning.lacitv.0rg/eir/Pase0Marina/DElR/files/D IVD.pdf: 713 East 5* DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

Similarly, all of the reduction strategies listed (Id., at 4.6-60 [Tbl. 4.6-7]) are purely aspirational. For example, what binding, specific, and mandatory action is required to "focus growth near destinations, emphasize land use patterns, leverage technology innovations, support development," etc.? Moreov^, this Project is not focusing on regional jobs/housing balance or emphasizing land use patterjis that capitalize on near transit investments because it squanders the opportunity to place housing^n this prime location.

Furthermore, curiously missing from the DEIR is any discussion of whether the Project is consistent with the numerous project-level mitigation measures recommended by SCAG,4o such as:
• Incorporate Best Available Control Technology ("BACT") during design, construction and operation of projects to minimize greenhouse gas emissions; • Adopt plan or mitigation program for the reduction of emissions that are required as part of the Lead Agency's decision; ; i -
• Use energy and fuel-efficient vehicles and equipment during construction; • Use the minimum feasible amount of greenhouse gas emitting construction materials that is feasible;
• Incorporate design measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from solid waste management through encouraging solid waste recycling and reuse; • Promote ride sharing programs e.g., by designating a certain percentage of parking spaces for high-occupancy vehicles, providing larger parking spaces to accommodate vans used for ride-sharing, and designating adequate passenger loading and unloading and waiting areas.

2. The DEIR Fails to Compare Relevant GHG Performance Benchmarks First, as discussed above (Section lI.A.2.i), the 2016 RTP/SCS had a VMT/sp goal for both SCAG-wide and LA County, which was updated under the 2020 RTP/SCS. (See figure below). Here, the Project generates 6,836 daily VMTs with a service population of 250 employees—resulting in a daily 27.3 VMT/sp. This is way above SCAG threshold metrics. If these same environmental preparers can argue being below this threshold is substantial evidence for showing consistency,4i so too being well above this threshold is substantial evidence of inconsistency.

DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

SCAG-Wide
2016 RTP/SCS 2020 RTP/SCS
MCounty
2016 RTP/SCS : 2020 RTP/SCS
^012 22.8 21.5
2016 23.2 .•'''22.2
2020 22.4 21.4
2035 21.1 19.7
2040 20.5 18.4
2045 20.7 19.2
Second, while the DEIR notes RTP/SCS's GHG per capita reductions from auto/Iight-truck emissions (i.e., SB 375's goal) (DEIR, pp. PDF pp. 126,261,287,291,364-367), it does not show the Project is coming close to this figure. This goal is reflected in SCAG's 2016 RTP/SCS Program EIR ("PEIR")'^2 that determined the per capita emissions were 23.8 pounds per day ("lbs/day") in 2005, and that SCAG's 2016 RTP/SCS plan would achieve per capita emissions of 21.4 lbs/day in 2020 and 19.5 lbs/day in 2035 (see table excerpted directly below) (See figure below.) TABLE 3.8.4-3
SB 375 ANALYSIS
2005 (Baseline);^ 2020 (Plan)a^ ii^2035 {Plan); ^ a 2040 (Plan) Resident population (per I.OOO) 17,161 19,060 21.475 22.116 COj emissions (per l.OOO tons) 204.0- 203.6-" 206.0'* 203.0'- Per capita emissions (pounds/day) 23.8 21.4 19.5 18.7
96 difference from Plan (2020) to Baseline (2005) -896- 96 difference from Plan (203S) to Baseline (2005) -1896--- 96 difference from Plan (2040) to Baseline (2005) -2296--" NOTE:
* Based on EMPAC20O7
Based on EMFAC2014
**'included off-model adjustments for 203S and 2040
SOURCE:

SCAG modeling. 2015
Southern California Association of Govemnrtents. 5 November 2015. Item No. 1 Staff Report: 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Ptai%/SustainaOie Communities Strategy (2016 RTP/SCS) — Proposed Major Components. Available at:
http:/Awvw.scagxa.gov/committee5/CommitteeOocUbrary/jolntRCPC110SlSfuiiagn.pdf The above performance goals have been updated pursuant to SCAG's adoption of the 2020 RTP/SCS.'*'^ (See figure below.)
Street Project (December 2018) PDF p. 63. https://planning.lacitv.orp/eir/713 East 5th/DElR/files/D IVC.pdf.
'*2 SCAG (Apr. 2016) 2016 RTP/SCS, pp. 8,15,153,166, https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/fileattachments/f2016rtpscs.pdf?1606Q0.5557.

SCAG (11/24/15) 2016 RTP/SCS Draft PEIR, pp. 3.8-37 - 3.8-38, https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/fileattachments/2016dpeir complete.pdf?1624320652.

See e.g., SCAG (9/3/20) 2020 RTP/SCS, pp. 9,48,138, https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/fileattachments/0903fconnectsocal-plan 0.pdP1606001176: SCAG (Nov. 2019) 2020 RTP/SCS Draft PEIR, pp.

3.8-73 - 3.8-74, https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/fpeir connectsocal complete.

Ddf?1607981618.

DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

Table 3.8-10
SB 375 Analysis
; 2005 (Baseline) 2020 (Flan) 2035 (Flan)
Kestdenx popidatien (per 1.<XX))
C02 exnissloans (per 1.000 tons) . 1.

Per capita emissions (po%mds'day> ..
difference from Plan (2020) to Baseline (2003)
difference from Plan (2033) to Baseline (2005)

17.161
204.0 »•
• 23.S

19.194
2043*

21.3 21.110
19S.6-'*o/
1S.S
-S"?.
-19% e
/A'BssedaK£^tFAC2007
iBIBssed or. £.\£F.4C202J sxd SCA.G Tnadelirtg. 2019.
leJ Includes aff.^nod^ adfusttrumts Jbr 2035 and 2045
Source: SOIG modelixg. 2019.
?!it9://zcvzejfC3Sf.c3i.itiTrfcorxrmiteesyCoKTmiiieeDoeZibrarufioiKtRCPdlOS15iullas^.vdf Here, however, the DEIR fails to conduct any analysis to show that the Project would come close to the per capita auto/light-truck GHG emissions levels under the 2016 RTF/SCS (i.e., 21.4 and

19.5 Ibs/day/capita goal for 2020 and 2035 [respectively]) or the 2020 RTP/SCS (i.e., 21.3 and 18.8 Ibs/day/capita goal for 2020 and 2035 [respectively]).45 This analysis must be done to show that the Project is genuinely consistent with SCAG's RTP/SCS and SB 375 by meeting these specific performance goals.

3. SB 375 Is Not Enough to Meet State's Lona-Term GHG Goals SB 375 and VMT reductions anticipated under Sustainable Community Strategies ("SCS") are listed as one of many policies/strategies needed to help the State achieve its 2030 GHG reduction goals.'^® However, GARB has made it perfectly clear that consistency with SB 375 and SCS is not enough, as reflected below:
"An RTP/SCS that meets the applicable SB 375 targets alone will not produce the GHG emissions reductions necessary to meet state climate goals in 2030 nor in 2050. This means that SB 375 taraets are not stand-alone CEOA thresholds for GHG or transportation impact analysis (though SCS compliance may nonetheless entitle projects to certain CEQA exemptions or streamlining procedures pursuant to statute).

In other words, a project that is consistent with an SCS may be eligible for certain exemptions, but compliance does not necessarily more broadly imply consistency with state climate aoals nor with science-based GHG reduction taraets. in CARB staffs nonbinding view. Some land use development projects contemplated in an SCS that will be operational in 2030 and 2050 will be consistent with state climate goals, and SB 375 defines project circumstances under which CEQA streamlining is available to qualified projects consistent with an SCS. Other proiects mav need to consider additional mitiaation measures to further reduce per capita liaht-dutv transportationrelated GHG emissions to levels that would not conflict with state climate aoals ...

Ultimately, project evaluation continues to be in the purview of local planners. This paper's function is to provide a crosswalk amongst potential metrics, as they relate to modeling and scientific analysis offered by the State. As shown below, VMT metrics «Ibid., 2020 RTP/SCS Draft PEIR, Tbl. 3.8^10.
46 CARB (Nov. 2017) 2017 Scoping Plan, pp. 25,98,101-103. https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan /scoping plan 2Q17.pdf.

DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

may serve as an important adjunct or complement to GHG metrics." (Emphasis added.)47 ^
GARB continues to make clear that: Jr;
- "... no single project alone will cause a detectable change in the global climate. • However, when taken together, many land use development proiects. larae or small that deviate from the needed traiectorv to hit California's GHG taraets would result in a substantial conflict with California's GHG emission reduction goals, which would amount to a cumulatively substantial contribution of GHG emissions and the resulting global significant environmental impact of catastrophic climate change." To help local lead agencies to evaluate project's consistency with SB 32 and AB 32, GARB has provided analysis of the additional GHG reductions beyond that planned under the RTP/SGS that are necessary to achieve the State's mid-term 2030 and long-term 2050 GHG reduction goals.

To this end, GARB identified the population, and daily VMTs from total vehicles (i.e., all vehicles) and from light-duty vehicles ("LDV") (a subcomponent of all vehicles) for each year between 2010 to 2050 under two scenarios: (i) a "baseline scenario" that includes VMT projections in existing RTP/SGSs pursuant to SB 375 (including SGAG's 2016 RTP/SGS); and (ii) a "Gleaner Technologies and Fuels" ("CTF") scenario combining cleaner vehicles technologies "combined with slower growth in VMT would be "necessary" to achieve climate goals for 40 percent reduction in GHG emissions from 1990 level by 2030 and 80 percent by 2050.'*® Accordingly, the State would need to reduce total (i.e., all vehicles) daily VMT/capita by 14.3 percent and LDV daily VMT/capita by 16.8 percent beyond the RTP/SGS baseline scenario (as reflected in the GARB figures below).'*®

26.00 25.00
^24.00
^23.00 :44.396 ^ : reduction from
> : Existing needed
= * in 2050
Q V
g 21.00 - —
20 00 ^ -BaselineVMT
ap VMT

19.00 O lN^WOOO lN9 kO OOO (M9 IA OOO (NO (O eOO
ooooooooooooooooooooo
Figure 2: California Total Daily VMT Per Capita
'*7 GARB Qan. 2019) 2017 SCOPING PLAN-IDENTIFIED VMT REDUCTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP TO STATE - CLIMATE GOALS, p. 4, https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019-01/2017 sp vmt reductions |an

19.pdf: see also id. at p. 6 ("While the majority of the mobile-source GHG emissions reductions in the modeling are assumed to come from new vehicle technologies and low carbon fuels, reductions from curbing arov&th in VMT are also necessary to meet climate targets." Emphasis added). '*® Ibid., pp. 5-6. -
'*9 Ibid., pp. 9-10.

DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

Q.
n

27.00 25.00

23.00 0
>.
1 19.00
JZ
to

17.00 15.00

16.8% reduction
from Existing
needed in 2050
' Baseline VMT
•CTF VMT
O (N^U3 00OrN^U3 00OrM^ VO 00O
r-i T-( T-i T-i t-i rM rs rM r<g rM romromm^^
ooooooooooooooooo
U) 00 o
^ S o
r\l fM <M «N fM rM fM fM (N rM (Nrg fM fM (N fM <N <N <N <M fM Figure 3: California Light-Duty VMT Per Capita
When looking at CARB's underlying data,so clear benchmarks can be established at the State and County levels to compare against the Project. Statewide, GARB explicitly provides the daily VMT/capita benchmarks for total vehicles and LDV vehicles under both the Baseline Scenario (i.e., just RTP/SCS reductions) and the CTF Scenario (i.e., RTP/SCS plus cleaner tech and slower VMT growth). The DEIR should have compared the Project to these benchmarks to see if this Project would even come close to these VMT/capita benchmarks.

D. DEIR'S CARE 2017 SCOPING PLAN IS LACKING.

1. The DEIR Relies on The Old Scoping Plan for GHGs
As a threshold matter, the DEIR cites the 2008 CARB Climate Change Scoping Plan, and explains the numerous revisions over the past decade. In narrative, the DEIR explains the 2017 Scoping Plan Update and other measures taken to comply with AB 32 and SB 32 targets. (DEIR, PDF p. 344.) However, the DEIR is inconsistent in referring to 2008 and 2017 Scoping Plans interchangeably, failing to explain which one the DEIR is applying the Project (DEIR, PDF p. 353 [TbI.4.6-5].) This should be clarified. The 2017 Scoping Plan applies to this Project. s" See CARB Qan. 2019) 2017 Scoping Plan-Identified VMT Reductions and Relationship to State Climate Goals Webpage (including provided Excel file provided therein), https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/^doc uments/carb-2017-scoping-plan-identlfied-vmt-reductions-and-relationship-state-climate: see also Excel Sheet "Readme", https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019-01/sp mss vmt calculations ianl9 O.xLsx.

DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

2. Perfunctory Consistency Evaluation to Non-Specific. Non-Bindina. Unrelated Actions
As discussed above, the rebuttable presumption afforded under CEQA Guidelines § 15064(h)(3) applies only when actions are specific, binding, and not merely aspirational. Here;ii54 however, CARB has made clear that the Scoping Plan guidelines and objectives are not binding on local agencies..5i As CARB states in the 2017 Updated Scoping Plan, "[i]mplementation of [GHG reductions] change will rely, in part, on local land use decisions to reduce GHG emissions associated with the transportation sector, both at the project level, and in long-term plans (including general plans, climate action plans, specific plans, and transportation plans) and supporting sustainable community strategies developed under SB 375.52 Because local agencies retain permitting authority, consistency on state and regional land use goals are primarily achieved at the project level.

Additionally, the DEIR claims the Project is consistent with the 2017 Scoping Plan by listing 11 action and strategies—ten of which are admittedly state or regional responsibilities. Most of the actions and strategies are the sole responsibility of regulatory parties in Sacramento to adopt rules and regulations which result in GHG reductions otherwise required by law (i.e., SB 350's renewable energy resources. Low Emission Vehicle Zones, increase SB 375 stringency. Low Carbon Fuel Standard, Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Strategy). (DEIR, pp. 4.6-55 - 4.6-57 [Tbl. 4.6-6].) Many are also entirely irrelevant actions, such as the California Sustainable Freight Action Plan.

Furthermore, the DEIR fails to consider any of the plan-level or project-level mitigation measures proposed by in the 2017 Scoping Plan Appendix B,53 which has an entire section dedicated to Local Actions that lead agencies can take when implementing general or specific plans and projects.54 The actions listed include increasing renewable energy generation, quantifying and preparing for electric charging infrastructure, and restricting idling of all vehicles.ss The Project needs to do more of the here.

3. The DEIR's Quantitative Analysis for GHGs is Inadequate First, as discussed above (Section III), the DEIR relies on a flawed CalEEMod modeling and, thus, emissions are entirely unreliable and need to be remodeled. Second, as discussed in Section Il.A.2.g above, the Project is not a genuine mixed-use project, but instead is a 100 percent commercial project. Thus, the most applicable GHG threshold would be 1,400 MTC02e/yr standard, which the Project exceeds.^^ Third, when the Project's 1,966 MTC02e/yr is divided by its service 51 See e.g., CARB (12/5/18) RE Centennial Specific Plan Final EIR, pp. 3-4,6-7,10-11, http.s://wwS.arb.ca.gov/ toxics/ttdceqalist/centennialfeir.pdf.
52 CARB 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, p. 76. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/defaiilt/files/classic/cc/ scopingplan/scoping plan 2017.pdf.
53 CARB (Nov. 2017) 2017 Scoping Plan, Appendix B Local Action, pp. 8-11, https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/ default/fi]es/classic/cc/scopingplan/2030sp appb localaction final.pdf. 54 Ibid. .. .
55 Ibid.
55 The City of Los Angeles has used this option numerous times. (See e.g., e.g., Venice Blvd. Self-Storage project (DC? Case No. ENV-2017-3855) MND, PDF pp. 49-50 (applying 1,400 MTC02e/3a'threshold for commercfal project), bttDs:/7Dlanning.lacitv.org/staffrpt/mnd/Publ01818/ENV-2017-3855.pdf; 6516 W. Selma Ave. project (DCP Case No. ENV-2016-4313) MND, PDF pp. 102-104 (utilizing Tier 4 analysis and noting DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

population of 250 employees, the Project achieves an efficiency level of 7.8 MTC02e/yr/sp—which exceeds SCAQMD's Tier 4 per capita standards. So too, the Project efficiency threshold exceeds the

2.6 MTC02e/yr/sp threshold advanced by the Association of Environmental Professionals ("AEP") for projects with a horizon between 2021 and 2030."
V. HOUSING ISSUES NEED BETTER CEQA ANALYSIS
The City is facing a steep increase in its Regional Housing Need Allocation ("RHNA"] obligations. SCAG has allocated the City an obligation of 3,104 new affordable units (i.e., moderate income or below) over the next eight-year planning period.^s Although the City is currently appealing this allocation (asking for reduction of 1,486 units),^^ the City is still looking at a steep increase under its Draft 2021-2029 6th Cycle Element.^® (See figure below.) The greater Los Angeles region is facing an extraordinary shortage of affordable housing, and the simple fact remains: all cities within the SCAG region need to produce more housing units—including Beverly Hills, which has twice as many jobs (74,800) as people (34,500)^1 and not enough affordable homes for its lower paid workforce tJiat is compelled to longer, VMT-inducing commutes. This matters a lot to Local 11.

Gly of Beverly Hills Generol Plan
21^29,ti(Ufi|2qABement
• Over-concentration of lower income housetiolds
• Physical constraints such as fire and flood hazards
SCAG's RHNA allocation to Beverly Hills for the 2021-2029 planning period is shown in Table A-3.

Table A-3 Regional Housing Needs Assessment 2021-2029, Beverly Hills Incoma Level Percent of AMP Unhs Percent
Vefy Low" Upto^% 1,008 32%
Low 51-80% 680 22%
Modofste 81-120% 602 19%
Above Moderate 120%+ 814 26%
Total 3.104 100%
Source: htIps:ffscag.ca.sovJhouslng
' AMI - Arra Median Inoxne.
** Includes (he exIrerneliHow incnne category
"SCAQMD's draft thresholds have also been utilized for other projects in the City."), http://clkrep.lacity.org/ onlinedocs/2008/0B-0887-Sl misc7 02-22-2Q17.pdf.T
57 AEP (Oct 2016) Beyond Newhall and 2020: A Field Guide to New CEQA Greenhouse Gas Thresholds and Climate Action Plan Targets for California, p. 40 ("Once the state has a full plan for 2030 (which is expected in 2017), and then a project with a horizon between 2021 and 2030 should be evaluated based on a threshold using the 2030 target A more conservative approach would be to apply a 2030 threshold based on SB 32 for any project with a horizon between 2021 and 2030 regardless of the status of the Scoping Plan Update."), https://califaep.org/docs/AEP-2016 Final White Paper.pdf. 5® SCAG 6th Cycle Final RHNA Allocation Plan, PDF p. 2, https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/fileattachments/6th-cvcle-rhna-proposed-final-allocation-plan.pdf?1614911196. : - 5® City of Beverly Hills Sixth Cycle Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) Appeal, https://scag.ca.gov/ sites/main/files/file-attachments/beverlyhills-rhna-appeal-request.pdf?1604954426. 5® City of Beverly Hills Draft 2021-2029 Housing Element, p. 49: https:/ /wwwiicd.ca.gov/Housing Elements/downloadFileServlet?id=1199.

SCAG (2019) Local Profile-City of Beverly Hills, PDF p. 3, https:/ /scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/fileattachments/beverlvhills localprofile.pdf?! 60.5663947.

DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

In its appeal let^ento the Housing and Community Development Agency ("HCD") and SCAG, -r the City claims to be "built out.... with little to no urban land for development of housing."®^ The r City claims that it cannot possibly meet the housing goals of the region and state for multiple reasons, one being that the City lacks adequate space to put the housing. At the same time, the City ";'■ has built and developedittfmerous^ibtels in the past decade — largely in the direct area around the *^5 Project Site. Regardless of whether the City implements the lower RHNA or original RHNA targets, the City must prioritize prime, transit-rich location—like this Site—for housing if the City is going to reach its RHNA obligations. By refusing to consider housing here at this Site the City is consciously choosing to not even try to satisfy its RHNA target.

Additionally, as noted in its appeal letter, the City expressed significant concern about the demolition required to meet the RHNA allocation. ^3 However, this Project has the potential to deliver housing without the need for demolition or risking displacement. No residents would be displaced by developing this Project Site into residential units, and this would address a sizable percentage of the City's RHNA allocation. There is simply no reason why the City should not consider a Project alternative that would include more housing, which would not only address its RHNA obligation but also reduce the Project's VMT/GHG impacts. Failing to do so violates CEQA's requirement that an EIR address and analyze land use inconsistency.^'* VI. LAND USE IMPACTS & CODE-RECORD FINDINGS
By taking a prime location ripe for mixed-use housing and instead siting a VMT-inducing, 100 percent commercial use, the City disregards numerous Land Use^s and Housing" goals and policies under the General Plan, such as:
• LUl Long-term Stability: here, the Project cuts against the City's ability to offer quality "housing stock which offers a variety of housing" particularly to affordable housing. • LU2.2 Public Streetscapes and Landscape: here, the Project will "replace 15 trees that line the sidewalks adjacent to the onsite buildings," (DEIR, PDF p. 390) running counter to the Beverly Hills Sustainable City Plan goal of preserving trees under the City's Street Tree Plan, even as the Project aims to replace the trees at a 1:1 ratio. • LU9.1 Uses for Diverse Customers: here, the Project will serve only high-income visitors to the City. The Project will fail to bring benefits to local residents, who will be prohibited from using many of the amenities provided to hotel guests and exclusive club members. 62 City (10/26/20) Appeal Letter to HCD and SCAG, p.4, https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/fileattachments/beverlvhills-rhna-appealTrequest.pdf?1604954426. 63 Ibid. p. 5.
64 See e.g., CEQA Guidelines § lS125(d); Pfeifferv. City of Sunnyvale City Council (2011) 200 Cal.App.4th 1552, 1566; Friends of the Eel River v. SonomaXounty Water Agency (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 859,881. 6ShttD://www.beverlvhills.6rg/chhfiles/storage/files/filebank/10278-2 LandUse%2001122010.pdf. 66 City of Beverly Hills Housing Element http://www.beverlyhills.org/cbhfiles/storage /files /6870944521 688090786/BHHousingElementwmaps.pdf.

DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

• LU14 Environmental Sustainability and Carbon Footprint: here, as discussed above, the Project will have a significant environmental impact and will not lead to a reduction in vehicle trips, VMT and air pollution.
• LU16.4 Public Places: here, as discussed above, the vast majority of the Project's square footage and development will be reserved for private access, usage, and ehjo3m[ient. The Project deceptively describes private open space as benefiting the general public. • 0S7 Improved Air Quality: here, as discussed above, the Project will create more traffic and air pollution from hotel guests and club members. The proximity to public transit and bicycle parking is irrelevant for hotel guests who will be traveling long distances to stay at the global destination.
• H2.9 Jobs/Housing Balance: here, the Project fails to promote any program that seeks to : i provide housing opportunities for people who work in the City like Local .11 members as a means of reducing long commutes, easing local traffic, improving air quality, and helping to achieve a balanced regional jobs/housing distribution for the western portion of Los Angeles County. (DEIR, PDF p. 127.)
Due to these issues, the Project is inconsistent with the General Plan and, thus, run against Code-required findings necessary to grant the Entitlements.

VII. THE DEIR FAILS TO PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS Under CEQA, the discussion of mitigation and alternatives is "the core of an EIR," requiring a lead agency to select a reasonable range of alternatives for evaluation guided by a clearly written statement of objectives. {Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553,564- 65; see also CEQA Guidelines § 15124(b).) It is the lead agency's affirmative duty to approve a project only after "meaningful consideration of alternatives and mitigation measures." {Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game Com. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105,134.) This duty cannot be defeated by defining objectives too narrowly or too broadly or artificially limiting the agencies' ability to implement reasonable alternatives by prior contractual commitments. (See e.g.. City ofSantee v.

County of San Diego (1989) 214 Cal.App.3d 1438,1447; Kings County Farm Bureau v. City ofHanford (1990) 221 Cal.App.3d 692,736.) Instead, a "reasonable range of alternatives" should be:
• "capable of being accomplished in a successful manner" (Pub. Res. Code § 21061.1); • "attain most of the basic objectives of the project" {Sierra Club v. County of Napa (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 1490,1509 [citing CEQA Guidelines § 15126.6(a) and (f)]); and • achieve the project's "underlying fundamental purpose" (In re Bay-Delta (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1143,1164-1165 [citing CEQA Guidelines § 15124(b)]).

While alternatives must implement the most basic project objectives, they need not implement all of them. (See California Native Plant Soc'y v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 957,991; see also Mira Mar Mobile Community v. City ofOceanside (2004) 119 Cal.App.4th 477,488- 489.) The discussion must "focus on alternatives capable of eliminating any significant adverse environmental effects or reducing them to a level of insignificance, even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives, or would be costlier." {Friends of the Eel River v. Sonoma County Water Agency (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 859,873; see also CEQA DEIR Comments RE Cheval Blanc Specific Plan
November 1,2021

Guidelines § 15126.6(a); Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. San Diego Assn. of Governments (2017) 17 CaI.App.5th 413,436 [EIR-discussion deficient where no alternative was considered that significantly reduced total vehicle miles traveled and where the alternatives labeled 'transit emphasis' was a "misnomer" given they only advanced certain rapid bus projects, left rail/trolley projects largely unchanged, and provided no increased transit projects/services].) Here, as discussed above, the DEIR fails to adequately assess Project impacts relating to VMTs, GHGs, and housing. As a result, the DElR's project alternative analysis is inadequate because it does not consider mitigation and alternatives that address these issues—such as a genuine mixed-use project with housing (particularly some affordable housing). This project alternative would serve many of the Project's base objectives consistent with CEQA and would be consistent with smart grow± principles called for by SCAG, CARB, and alike.®? So too, it would produce more housing, which is a rare opportunity to put an enormous dent into the City's desperately needed affordable housing requirements. Failing to even consider housing at the Site would be a missed opportunity for the City.

VIII. CONCLUSION
In sum. Local 11 is seriously concerned with the DElR's failure to adequately assess the Project's impact on VMTs, GHGs, the City's housing requirements. These flaws must be cured through a recirculated EIR, with adequate mitigation measures and project alternatives considered.

Until these issues are addressed. Local 11 respectfully urges the City to stay any action on the Project Approvals.

Finally, on behalf of Local 11, this Office requests, to the extent not already on the notice list, all notices of CEQA actions and any approvals, Project CEQA determinations, or public hearings to be held on the Project under state or local law requiring local agencies to mail such notices to any person who has filed a written request for them. (Pub. Res. Code §§, 21092.2,21167(f) and Gov.

Code § 65092) Please send notice by electronic and regular mail to Jordan R. Sisson, Esq., 801S.

Grand Avenue, 11th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90017. [email protected].

Thank you for consideration of these comments. We ask that this letter is placed in the administrative record for the Project
Sincerely,
Jordan R. Sisson )
At^rney for Local-H
®? See e.g., California Native Plant Soc'y v. City ofSanta Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 957,991; Mira Mar Mobile Community v. City ofOceanside (2004) 119 Gal App.^th 477,488-489; Friends of the Eel River v. Sonoma County Water Agency (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 859,873; Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. San Diego Assn. of Governments (2017) 17 Cal.App.5th 413,436; CEQA Guidelines § 15126.6(a). -m.
3t ■
"t -.'Si
"5^F
■&

EXHIBIT B
smart
mobility
794 Sawnee Bean Road
Thetford Center VT 05075
Norman Marshall, President
(802) 356-2969
[email protected]
June 21, 2022
Jordan R. Sisson
Law Office of Gideon Kracov
801S. Grand Ave., 11**' Fl.

Los Angeles, CA 90017
Subject: Comments on the Cheval Blanc Project
Dear Mr. Sisson,
I have reviewed vehicle miles traveled ("VMT") impacts in the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") dated February 2022 and Draft Environmental Impact Report ("DEIR") dated September 2021. 1 make the following findings:
1) The FEIR improperly screened the Project from doing a full VMT analysis because the Project is in a Transit Priority Area. It is inappropriate to exempt every project in a TPA area from a full VMT analysis without considering whether VMT will be reduced significantly due to proximity to transit. In this case, it is likely that only a small percentage of Project trips will use transit. In fact, as documented below this combination of reliance on TNC used by customers and long-distance commutes by service workers will result in high Project VMT - much higher than disclosed. The true Project VMT should be analyzed and disclosed, and mitigation should be proposed to reduce these impacts.
2) The FEIR makes false claims that the Project design reduces VMT significantly - The FEIR claims that "Project Design Features" will reduce Project VMT by 67 "as compared to a project that would not include the same VMT/GHG reducing elements and measures." In fact, the only relevant design feature, density, would reduce VMT by only 2.5% using the most recent guidance by the California Air Pollution and Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). 3) The FEIR fails to disclose that the Project's reliance on TNCs will increase VMT significantly - The FEIR state that 66.6% of hotel customer vehicle trips and 50% of restaurant customer vehicle trips will by TNC (e.g., Uber or Lyft). TNCs add significant VMT because of "deadheading"; i.e., the VMT made by the TNC vehicle when there are no customers in the car - including driving to the next fare, as well as driving done on the beginning and end of TNC shifts. With the high TNC shares assumed in the FEIR, hotel customer VMT is increased by 46%, and restaurant customer is increased by 34% relative to a no-TNC baseline.
4) The Project would exacerbate jobs/housing imbalance for service workers - Only 4% of all workers earning less than $40,000 per year employed in the City of Beverly Hills also live in Beverly Hills. The mean commute distance is 13 miles straight-line and considerably longer along streets and transit routes. The FEIR falsely assumes an average commute distance of 5.5 miles and greatly underestimates VMT and associated greenhouse gas emissions. 5) The City of Beverly Hills should not approve any projects that create many additional service jobs without a sure path to provide a fair share of workforce housing. To date, the City has failed to produce an approved Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) plan. 1) The FEIR Improperly Screened the Project from Doing a Full VMT Analysis Including Mitigation
The FEIR discusses four screening criteria adopted by the City of Beverly Hills that may be used to screen projects from requiring a full VMT analysis. The FEIR claims that two of the four screening criteria are relevant to the project. First, it notes that the Project's 24,976 square feet are less than a threshold of 50,000 square feet and argues that the retail component can be screened out. (FEIR, p. 4.9-28-4.9-29) This is irrelevant because either the entire Project is screened out or it is not. Second, the FEIR states:"... projects located in a Transit Priority Area (TPA) may be screened out from conducting a VMT analysis because they are presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary." (FEIR, p.4.9-29)
It is inappropriate to exempt every project in a TPA area from a full VMT analysis without considering whether VMT will be reduced significantly due to proximity to transit. In this case, it is likely that only a small percentage of Project trips will use transit. As discussed below, the FEIR assumes that large shares of hotel and restaurant customer trips will be by transit network companies ('TNCs") like Uber and Lyft.

It is unlikely that many of the "luxury hotel" or "private club" customers will use transit. While transit service will be important for some of the employees, service workers employed in the City of Beverly Hills have long commutes from all corners of the greater Los Angeles region (documented below).

Transit is not a good option for most of the longer-distance commuters, especially if evening and/or weekend work is involved.

In fact, as documented below this combination of reliance on TNC used by customers and long-distance commutes by service workers will result in high Project VMT - much higher than disclosed. The true Project VMTshould be analyzed and disclosed, and mitigation should be proposed to reduce these impacts.
2) The FEIR Makes False Claims that the Project Design Reduces VMT Significantly The FEIR claims that the Project's "densification, location, and measures incorporated into the Project" would result in a "67-percent reduction in mobile-source GHG emissions as compared to a project that would not include the same VMT/GFIG reducing elements atid measures." (FEIR p. 10.0-64) The 67% number has carried over from the DEIR and is baseji on calculations in CalEEMod 2016.3.2 where boxes were checked for;
• Increase density,
• Increase diversity,
• Improve walkability design,
• Increase transit accessibility,
• Improve pedestrian network, and
• Provide traffic calming measures.

The FEIR calls these "Project Design Features" or "PDFs." In'fact, the measures incorporated into the Project impact only one of the six areas claimed -increased density. The Project does not increase diversity because it does not include housing; therefore, this box should not have been checked. The Project is in a relatively walkable, transit-accessible location, but the Project measures do nothing to improve this. Any other project in this location would have similar VMT reductions from a hypothetical baseline.

The mitigation calculations in CalEEMod 2016.3.2 are outdated. The FEIR states that CalEEMod 2020.40 gives the same VMT reductions. (FEIR p. 10-0-54 and Appendix K) However, I was unable to reproduce this finding. When I checked the mitigation boxes in CalEEMod 2016.3.2 I got significant VMT reductions - but when I opened the input file in CalEEMod 2020.40 and.recalculated, I got no VMT reductions.

Appendix K does not show how the mitigation was input in CalEEMod 2020.40.

In 2021, the California Air Pollution and Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) published comprehensive updated guidance on estimating VMT reductions in its Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity: Designed for Local Governments, Communities and Project Developers} The Handbook makes a clear distinction between measures that operate at a "Project/Site" scale vs. a "Plan/Community" scale. The Handbook states:

The GHG reductions of transportation measures from different scales of application should never be combined. While it may be possible that a user's project involves measures that affect vehicle trips or VMT at both scales, it is likely that combining the percent reduction from measures of different scales would not be valid. {Handbook, p. 63)
In reviewing the Project, only the Project/Site measures are relevant because any alternative project on this site would share the Plan/Community scale features that are already in place and would not be significantly changed by the Project.
^ https://www.caleemod.com/documents/handbook/full_handbook.pdf The only Project/Site measure in the FEIR's list of "mitigation" measures is density. Applying the density equation in the^andbook, the Project's employment density is calculated to reduce VMT by 2.5%.^ This is o.a!y 4% of the reduction falsely claimed in the FEIR. 3) The FEIR Fails tot)isclose that the Project's Reliance on TNCs Will Increase VMT Significantly
The FEIR assumes that a high proportion of hotel and restaurant customer trips will be made by transportation network companies (TNCs) like Uber and Lyft - 66.6% of hotel customer vehicle trips and 50% of restaurant customer vehicle trips. (FEIR, Appendix H, p. 29 of 384) TNC trips reduce parking demand, but they significantly increase VMT because of "deadheading", i.e., the VMT made by the TNC vehicle when there are no customers in the car - including driving to the next fare, as well as driving done on the beginning and end of TNC shifts. Most of the TNC driers will live well outside of Beverly Hills. Research indicates that" "The conservative (lower end) percentage of deadheading miles from ridehailing is 40.8%."^ If 40.8% of TNC VMT is deadheading, 1 VMT for a vehicle parked on site expands to 1.69 TNC VMT. With a 66.66% TNC share, the hotel customer VMT needs to be increased by 46%, and with a 50% TNC share, the restaurant customer TNC needs to be increased by 34%. These numbers are much larger than the 2.5% VMT reduction that is estimated due to increased density. Increased VMT associated with deadheading is an important reason that TNCs have been found to have significantly increased congestion in San Francisco."^ 4) The Project Would Exacerbate Jobs/Housing Imbalance for Service Workers The U.S. Census Bureau publishes Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics ("LEHD") OriginDestination Employment Statistics ("LODES") data that provide detailed geographic data about workers, jobs, and commutes segmented across three earnings groups:
• $12S0/month or less
• $12Sl/month to $3333/month
• greater than $3333/month
These categories are split at annual earnings thresholds of $15,000 and $40,000. The two lower-income groups (up to $40,000) are combined to represent typical service workers.

The LODES data include three parts:
• number of workers at the home location,
• number of jobs at the workplace location, and
• flows of workers from home location to workplace location.

Figure 1 shows the home locations from the LODES data for workers employed in Beverly Hills earning up to $40,000 per year.
^ 250 employees (FEIR p. 4.1-46) on 1.277 acres (FEIR p. ES-3) and applying equation in Handbook p. 74 ' Henao, A., W Marshall and B. Janson. Impacts of Ridesourcing on VMT, Parking Demand, Transportation Equity and Travel Behavior, March 2019. httDs://rosaD.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42496/dot 42496 DSl.odf " San Francisco County Transportation Authority. TNCs and Congestion. October 2018. https://www.sfcta.ore/sites/default/files/2019-02/TNCs Congestion Report 181015 Final.pdf Figure 1: Low-Income Beverly Hills Workers Home Locations (Each Dot Represents 10 Workers)^ Angeles
Notional forcat™''
~.y. .
'Ix r'TT I !• fi=.'
Moun
t-."Y-i' J-'i■'cY-' 'SiY"■ ■:. Yi,'■:;■■
fc£S>iT=dtl 2010 06 trectIO Dot-Density Thema
• ■« 10 ■
D 1.9 0.7 ia
Only 4 percent of the workers earning less than $40,000 per year and employed in Beverly Hills also reside in Beverly Hills. The mean distance workers earning less than $40,000 per year commute to Beverly Hills jobs is 13 miles "as the crow flies" and the median average distance is 9.5 miles. The actual average distances along roads or transit are considerably greater.

The FEIR analyses with CalEEMod {FEIR Appendix K) start with the default work trip length of 16.6 miles which probably is roughly correct given the mean 13-mile average straight-line distance. But then the FEIR reduces it by 2/3 to 5.5 miles. This is ridiculously low as should have been obvious to anyone even slightly familiar with the housing situation in and around Beverly Hills. The FEIR greatly underestimates Project VMT and greenhouse gas emissions.
5) The Projects would create many additional service jobs without providing a fair share of workforce housing, which will exacerbate the City's job/housing-fit imbalance, and induce long, VMT-inducing commutes for workers at the Project Site Living closer to their jobs is not a practical choice for many of these workers. The greater Los Angeles region is facing an extraordinary shortage of affordable housing, with the City of Beverly Hills being particularly problematic. The Southern California Association of Governments {"SCAG") has adopted a LODES data (https://lehd.ces.census.eov/data/) mapped at the Census Tract level. 2021-2029 Regional Housing Needs Assessment ("RHNA")/ which allocates the need for 1,341,827 housing units across all jurisdictions—including 3,404 in the City of Beverly Hills: 1,008 very -low income, 680 low income, 602 moderate income, and 814 above-moderate income.^ The City has no approved plan to supply this housing, and the.California Department of Housing and Community Development - wrote the City a letter on January 14,2022® saying that the housing element submitted in October 2021 r-v is deficient and must revised. The deficiencies include:
• "... the element provides no analysis based on land-use controls, environmental constraints, infrastructure, and site improvements to demonstrate the calculation of residential capacity on identified sites."
• "... the element does not provide sufficient analysis to demonstrate existing uses will discontinue in the planning period, analyze existing leases or contracts that would prevent redevelopment of sites, or provide evidence of the City's past experience with converting existing uses to higher density residential development." Here, the Projects will create many additional service jobs without a sure path toward satisfying the state-mandated requirement to provide a fair share of workforce housing. This will exacerbate the existing imbalance of the City's lower-wage workers and the homes affordable to them (i.e., jobs/housing fit) and often forces lower-income workers to make the hard choice between: (i) paying a disproportionate percentage of their income on housing, (ii) living in substandard and/or overcrowded conditions in reduce housing costs, or (iii) enduring longer VMT/GHG-inducing commutes in search of affordable housing in areas further away from job centers.® The EIR fails to reconcile this issue.

Sincerely,
it
Norman L. Marshall
® SCAG S*** Cycle Final RHNA Allocatioh Plan, p. 1, httbs://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/6th-cvclerhna-proposed-final-allocation-plan.pdf?1614911196. 'https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/6th-cycle-rhna-final-allocation-plan.pdfP1625161899 ® https://www.beverlyhills.org/cbhfiles/storage/fiies/5852900341265S72046/HCDLettertoBH-l-14-2022.pdf ® https://nonprofithousing.org/wp-content/uploads/JH-Fit-Fact-Sheet-FINAL-9.15.pdf:
https://beverlvhiils.granicus.com/MetaViewer.phpPview id=49&clip id=6736&meta id=406717.

Resume

NORMAN L MARSHALL, PRESIDENT
[email protected] •
EDUCATION:'
Master of Science in Engineering Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 1982 Bachelor of Science in Mathematics, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, 1977 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: (34 Years, 20 at Smart Mobility, Inc.) Norm Marshall helped found Smart Mobility, Inc. in 2001. Prior to this, he was at RSG for 14 years where he developed a national practice in travel demand modeling. He specializes in analyzing the relationships between the built environment and travel behavior and doing planning that coordinates multi-modal transportation with land use and community needs.

Regional Land Use/Transportation Scenario Planning
Portland Area Comprehensive Transportation System (PACTS) - the Portland Maine Metropolitan Planning Organization. Updating regional travel demand model with new data (including AirSage), adding a truck model, and multiclass assignment including differentiation between cash toll and transponder payments.

Loudoun County Virginia Dynamic Traffic Assignment - Enhanced subarea travel demand model to include Dynamic Traffic Assignment (Cube). Model being used to better understand impacts of roadway expansion on induced travel.

Vermont Agency of Transportation-Enhanced statewide travel demand model to evaluate travel impacts of closures and delays resulting from severe storm events. Model uses innovate Monte Carlo simulations process to account for combinations of failures.

California Air Resources Board - Led team including the University of California in $250k project that reviewed the ability of the new generation of regional activity-based models and land use models to accurately account for greenhouse gas emissions from alternative scenarios including more compact walkable land use and roadway pricing. This work included hands-on testing of the most complex travel demand models in use in the U.S. today.

Climate Plan (California statewide) - Assisted large coalition of groups in reviewing and participating in the target setting process required by Senate Bill 375 and administered by the California Air Resources Board to reduce future greenhouse gas emissions through land use measures and other regional initiatives.

Chittenden County (2060 Land use and Transportation Vision Burlington Vermont region) - led extensive public visioning project as part of MPO's long-range transportation plan update.

Flagstaff Metropolitan Planning Organization - Implemented walk, transit and bike models within^regional travel demand model. The bike model includes skimming bike networks including on-road and off-road bicycle facilities with a bike level of service established for each segment.

Chicago Metropolis Plan and Chicago Metropolis Freight Plan (6-county region)— developed alternative transportation scenarios, made enhancements in the regional travel demand model, and used the enhanced model to evaluate alternative scenarios including.development of alternative regional transit concepts.

Developed multi-class assignment model and used it to analyze freight alternatives including congestion pricing and other peak shifting strategies.

Municipal Planning
City of Grand Rapids - Michigan Street Corridor -developed peak period subarea model including nonmotorized trips based on urban form. Model is being used to develop traffic volumes for several alternatives that are being additional analyzed using the City's Synchro model City of Omaha - Modified regional travel demand model to properly account for non-motorized trips, transit trips and shorter auto trips that would result from more compact mixed-use development. Scenarios with different roadway, transit, and land use alternatives were modeled.

City of Dublin (Columbus region) - Modified regional travel demand model to properly account for nonmotorized trips and shorter auto trips that would result from riiore compact mixed-use development. The model was applied in analyses for a new downtown to be constructed in the Bridge Street corridor on both sides of an historic village center.

City of Portland, Maine - Implemented model improvements that better account for non-motorized trips and interactions between land use and transportation and applied the enhanced model to two subarea studies.

City of Honolulu - Kaka'ako Transit Oriented Development (TOD) - applied regional travel demand model in estimating impacts of proposed TOD including estimating internal trip capture.

City of Burlington (Vermont) Transportation Plan - Led team that developing Transportation Plan focused on supporting increased population and employment without increases in traffic by focusing investments and policies on transit, walking, biking and Transportation Demand Management.

Transit Planning
Regional Transportation Authority (Chicago) and Chicago Metropolis 2020 - evaluated alternative 2020 and 2030 system-wide transit scenarios including deterioration and enhance/expand under alternative land use and energy pricing assumptions in support of initiatives for increased public funding.

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Austin, TX) Transit Vision - analyzed the regional effects of implementing the transit vision in concert with an aggressive transit-oriented development plan developed by Calthorpe Associates. Transit vision includes commuter rail and BRT.

Bus Rapid Transit for Northern Virginia HOT Lanes (Breakthrough Technologies, Inc and Environmental Defense.) - analyzed alternative Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) strategies for proposed privately-developing High Occupancy Toll lanes on 1-95 and 1-495 (Capital Beltway) including different service alternatives (point-to-point services, trunk lines intersecting connecting routes at in-line stations, and hybrid).

Roadway Corridor Planning
1-30 Little Rock Arkansas - Developed enhanced version of regional travel demand model that integrates TransCAD with open source Dynamic Traffic Assigniiient (DTA) software, and used to model 1-30 alternatives.

Freeway bottlenecks are modeled much more accurately than in the base TransCAD model.

South Evacuation Lifeline (SELL) - In work for the South Carolina Coastal Conservation League, used"Dynamic Travel Assignrnent (DTA) to estimate evaluation times with different transportation alternatives in coastal South Caroline including a new proposed freeway.

Hudson RivecCiossing Sj^dy (Capital District Transportation Committee and NYSDOT) - Analyzing.l6ngterm capacity needs for Hudson River bridges which a special focus on the 1-90 Patroon Island Bridge where a microsimulation VISSIM model was developed and applied.

PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS (partial list)
DTA Love: Co-leader of workshop on Dynamic Traffic Assignment at the June 2019 Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference.

Forecasting the Impossible: The Status Quo of Estimating Traffic Flows with Static Traffic Assignment and the Future of Dynamic Traffic Assignment. Research in Transportation Business and Management 2018.

Assessing Freeway Expansion Projects with Regional Dynamic Traffic Assignment. Presented at the August 2018 Transportation Research Board Tools of the Trade Conference on Transportation Planning for Small and Medium Sized Communities.

Vermont Statewide Resilience Modeling. With Joseph Segale, James Sullivan and Roy Schiff. Presented at the May 2017 Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference.

Assessing Freeway Expansion Projects with Regional Dynamic Traffic Assignment. Presented at the. May 2017 Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference.

Pre-Destination Choice Walk Mode Choice Modeling. Presented at the May 2017 Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference.

A Statistical Model of Regional Traffic Congestion in the United States, presented at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board.

MEMBERSHIPS/AFFILIATIONS
Associate Member, Transportation Research Board (TRB)
Member and Co-Leader Project for Transportation Modeling Reform, Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU) "5^

EXHIBITG
SWAPE
Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and
Litigation Support for the Environment
2656 29"' Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
.-•c ^
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
[email protected]
June 22,2022
Jordan Sisson
Law Office of Gideon Kracov
801S. Grand Ave., 11*^ Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Subject: Comments on the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Specific Plan (SCH No. 2020110223) Dear Mr. Sisson,
We have reviewed the September 2021 Draft Environmental Impact Report ("DEIR") for the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Specific Plan ("Project") located in the City of Beverly Hills ("City"). The Project proposes to demolish 56,787-SF of commercial and institutional space and construct a 212,034-SF multiple-use building, including a 166,724-SF hotel with 109 rooms and private club, 24,976-SF of retail space, and 20,334-SF of restaurant space, as well as 178 parking spaces on the 1.277-acre site.

Our review concludes that the DEIR fails to adequately evaluate the Project's air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts. As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project are underestimated and inadequately addressed. An updated EIR should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts that the Project may have on the surrounding environment.

Air Quality
Unsubstantiated Input Parameters Used to Estimate Project Emissions The DEIR's air quality analysis relies on emissions calculated with CalEEMod.2016.3.2 (p. 4.1-29).^ CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site-specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific project information is known, the user can change the default values and input r. project-specific values, but the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") requires that such changes^ ^ "CalEEMod User's Guide." California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
http://www.aamd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide.
be justified by substantial evidence. Once all of the values are inputted into the model, the Project's construction and operational emissions are calculated, and "output files" are generated. These output files disclose to the reader what parameters are utilized in calculating the Project's air pollutant emissions and make known which default values are changed as well as provide justification for the values selected.

When reviewing the Project's CalEEMod output files, provided in the Technical Appendix for Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions ("AQ & GHG Report") as Appendix B to the DEIR, we found that several model inputs were not consistent with information disclosed in the DEIR. As a result, the Project's construction and operational emissions are underestimated. Thus, an updated EIR should be prepared to include an updated air quality analysis that adequately evaluates the impacts that construction and operation of the Project will have on local and regional air quality.

Unsubstantiated Changes to Individual Construction Phase Lengths Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations" and "Cheval Blanc - Construction Onsite" models include several changes to the default individual construction phase lengths (see excerpt below) (Appendix B, pp. 16,39,86).

TatwName
TBRonsSucSonPnas?
Column Name
NumDays
DefaidtVauie New Value
tbiConstnictionPhase NumDays 230.00 109.00
tbiConstntctionPhase NumDays 230.00 49.00
tbiConstnictionPhase NumDays 230.00 544.00
tbiConstnictionPhase NumDays 20.00 22.00
tbiConstnictionPhase NumDays 20.00 23.00
tbiConstnictionPhase NumDays 20.00 32.00
tbiConstnictionPhase NumDays 20.00 82.00
UiiConstnictionPhase NumDays 20.00 66.00
As a result of these changes, the models include the following construction schedule (see excerpt below) (Appendix B, pp. 19,42,89).

Phase
Number
1 Phase Name 1 Phase Type
i,ir
EndDate NumDays
Week
NumDays
1 Phase 1 - UemoliUon uemoiiuon |11/1/2U22 11/3Ur2U22 5 22 2 Phase 1 - Grading Grading 112/1/2022 1/15/2023 5 32
3 Phase 1 • Building Constniction Building Construction |Vh6i^2i3 6/15/2023 5 109 4 Pti^ 2 - Demolition Demolition jwi/i2023 5/31/2023 5 23 5 Phase 2 • Excavation Grading jeTi/izblS" 9/23/2023 5 82 6 Phase 2 - Garage Construction Building Construction j9S472023 11/30/2023 5 49 7 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction Building Construction |l2/1/2d23 - 12/31/2025 ■ 5 544 8 Architectural Coatings Architectural Coating I't/iTaSs 12/31/2025 5 132 9 Paving Paving j 10/1/2025 12/31/2025 5 66
As you can see from the excerpts above, the Phase 1 - Demolition phase was increased by 10%, from the default value of 20 to 22 days; the Phase 1 - Grading phase was increased by 60%, from the default value of 20 to 32 days; the Phase 1 - Building Construction phase was decreased by 53%, from the default value of 230 to 109 daysf the Phase 2 - Demolition phase was increased by 15%, from the default value of 20 to 23 days; the Phase 2 - Excavation phase was increased by 310%, from the default value of 20 to 82 days; the Phase 2 - Garage Construction phase was decreased by 79%, from the default value of 230 to 49 days; the Phase 2 Hotel Construction phase was increased by 137%, from the default value of 230 to 544 days; the Architectural Coating phase was increased by 560% from the default value of 20 to 132 days; and the Paving phase was increased by 230%, from the default value of 20 to 66 days. As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.^ According to the "User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data" table, the justification provided for these changes is: "See construction assumptions" {Appendix B, pp. 15,38,85).

Furthermore, regarding the Project's anticipated construction schedule, the DEIR states:
"Construction of the Project is anticipated to commence in 2022 and would occur in two phases, which would overlap in their duration. Phase 1 would involve demolition of the existing structures at 449-453 and 461-465 North Beverly and construction of the relocated alley with overhead protection and associated subterranean levels. Phase 2 would include the balance of the Project. The overall duration of construction is estimated to be approximately 38 months with Project buildout in 2026. Project construction activities would include demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities.

Construction of Phase 1 would take approximately 7.5 months. Construction of Phase 2 would overlap Phase 1 by approximately 1.5 months and is estimated to last approximately 32 months" (p. 2.0-27).

Furthermore, regarding the construction schedule included in the models, the DEIR states:
"The input values used in this analysis were adjusted to be Project-specific based on equipment types and the construction schedule. These values were then applied to the construction phasing assumptions used in the criteria pollutant analysis to generate criteria pollutant emissions values for each construction activity. Construction tasks were aggregated to reflect overlapping tasks and identify the reasonably expected maximum construction emissions occurring over the course of Project construction. To be conservative, this analysis evaluates the Project's air quality impacts during construction based on reasonably expected maximum construction emissions even though such emissions would not occur throughout the entire construction period" (p. 4.1-37).

However, these justifications remain insufficient for two reasons. ^ "CalEEMod User's Guide." California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aamd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide. p. 1,14.

First, the DEIR and associated documents fall to provide the construction assumptions referenced by the "User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data" table. As such, we cannot verify the revised construction phase lengths are accurate.

Second, while the DEIR Indicates the overall construction duration of Phase 1 and 2, the DEIR falls to mention or justify the Individual construction phase lengths. This Is Incorrect, as according to the CalEEMod User's Guide:
"CalEEMod was also designed to allow the user to change the defaults to reflect site- or projectspecific Information, when available, provided that the Information Is supported by substantial evidence as required by CEQA." ^
Here, as the DEIR only justifies the total construction duration of 38 months, the DEIR falls to provide substantial evidence to support the revised Individual construction phase lengths. As such, we cannot verify the changes.

These unsubstantiated changes present an Issue, as the construction emissions are Improperly spread out over a longer period of time for some phases, but not for others. According to the CalEEMod User's Guide, each construction phase Is associated with different emissions activities (see excerpt below).^ Demolition Involves removing buildings or structures.

Site Preparation involves clearing vegetation (grubbing and tree/stump removal) and removing stones and other unwanted material or debris prior to grading.

Grading Involves the cut and fill of land to ensure that the proper base and slope Is created for the foundation.

Building Construction Involves the construction of the foundation, structures and buildings.

Architectural Coating involves the application of coatings to both the interior and exterior of buildings or structures, the painting of parking lot or parking garage striping, associated signage and curbs, and the painting of the walls or other components such as stair railings Inside parking structures.

Paving Involves the laying of concrete or asphalt such as In parking lots, roads, driveways, or sidewalks.

Thus, by disproportionately altering and extending some of the Individual construction phase lengths without proper justification, the models assume there are a greater number of days to complete the construction activities required by the prolonged phases. As such, there will be less construction activities required per day and, consequently, less pollutants emitted per day. Despite the DEIR's claim that the model evaluates "reasonably expected maximum construction emissions" associated with overlapping phases, the DEIR falls to account for the effects of disproportionately extending the different construction phase lengths (p. 4.1-37). As a result, the models may underestimate the peak ^ "CalEEMod User's Guide." California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, ovo/VoWe at:
httDs://www.aamd.eov/caleemod/user's-guide. p. 13-14. '"f- * "CalEEMod User's Guide." California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, avaiiable at:
httPs://www.aamd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide. p. 32.
daily emissions associated with some phases of constrtrction and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. it l _
Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations" and "Cheval Blanc - Construction'Onsite" models include several changes to the default offroad construction equipment unit amounts and usage hours (see excerpt below) (Appendix B, pp. 16-17, 39-40, 86-87).

T3bleT3i5n?
I
TolumirRam? I
tblOffRoadEquipment
tbldffPtoadEquipment
Q}ld^oadEquipment
tblOffRoadiquipmenl
tt>lbf(Ro3dEquipment
tblOfTRoadEquipment
ttibffRoadEquipment
UXOflRoadEquipment
toKJfflRMdEqtiipmeni
OHRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
OffRoadEqupmentUnitAmount
OffRoadEqupmentUnitAmount
OffRoadEquipmentUnttAtnount
OffRoadEquipmeRtUnitAmount
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAnwunt
OffRoadEquipmentUniiAmount
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
OffRoadEquipfnentUnltAmou^^
tblOffRoadEquipment
tblOftRoadEquii -
tblOffRoadEquipment
tblOffRoadEquipment
UsageHours
(JsageHours
UsageHours
IJsageHours
tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHo

1.00 loo
inoo"
Too"
Too"
liSo
T6F

2.00 "Too"
Too

2.00 2.00"
"ooF
Fdo

3.00 2.00

1.00 0.00

7.00 sM

7.00 8.00

7.00 8.00

7.00 8.00

7.00 8.00
As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.® According to the "User Entered Comments and Non-Default Data" table, the justification provided for these changes is: "see construction assumptions" (Appendix B, pp. 15,38,85).

Furthermore, as previously mentioned, the DEIR states:
"The input values used in this analysis were adjusted to be Project-specific based on equipment types and the construction schedule" (p. 4.1-37).

However, these justifications remain insufficient, as the DEIR and associated documents fail to provide the above-mentioned construction assumptions or Project-specific equipment types. Furthermore, the DEIR and associated documents fail to discuss or justify the exact off-road construction equipment unit amounts or usage hours whatsoever. This is incorrect, as according to the CalEEMod User's Guide:
® "CalEEMod User's Guide." California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
httPs://www.aamd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide. p. 1,14.
-*A"CalEEMod was also designed to allow the user to change the defaults to reflect site- or project^ •specific information, when available, provided that the information is supported by substantial evidence as required by CEQA." ®
As suchf until additional information becomes available that substantiates the revised unit amounts and usage'hours, we are unable to verify the changes included in the models are an accurate reflection of the alleged equipment types.

These unsubstantiated reductions present an issue, as CalEEMod uses the off-road equipment input ' parameters to calculate the emissions associated with off-road construction equipment.' By including unsubstantiated changes to the default off-road construction equipment unit amounts and usage hours, the models may underestimate the Project's construction-related emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Unsubstantiated Reductions of Hauling Trip Numbers
Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations" and "Cheval Blanc - Construction Onsite" models include several reductions to the default hauling trip numbers (see excerpt below) (Appendix B, pp. 17,40,87).

Table Name ,C(Aimn Name | Default Value , NewVaKte
tbiTripsAndVMT HauIingTripNumber 135.00 0.00
tbrrtipsAndVMT HauItngTripNumber 4,321.00 0.00
tbUripsAndVMT HauIingTripNumber 124.00 0.00
- tbITripsAraJVMT HaulingT ripNumber 11,295.00 0.00
As a result of these changes, the models include no hauling trips for any phase of construction (see excerpt below) (Appendix B, pp. 21,44,91).
® "CalEEMod User's Guide." California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021,'available at:^ https://www.aamd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide. p. 13-14.
' "CalEEMod User's-Guide." California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021;.avaHable at:
https://www.aamd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide. p. 33-34.

Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
^Worker Trip"'
Number ^
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Phase 1 - Demolition 7 50.00 60.00 0.00
Phase 1 - Grading 10 136.00 120.00 0.00
Phase 1 - Building
finnetnirtinn
9 200.00 100.00 0.00
Phase 2 - Demolition 7 50.00 60.00 0.00
Phase 2 - Excavation 10 136.00 120.00 0.00
Phase 2 - Garage
Onnstniciinn
9 200.00 100.00 0.00
Phase 2 - Hotel
r^nnctri irtinn
10 650.00 50.00 0.00
Architectural Coatings 3 300.00 20.00 0.00
Paving 4 50.00 20.00 0.00
As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.® According to the "User Entered Comments and Non-Default Data" table, the Justification provided for these changes is: "see assumptions. Demolition and Excavation would have up to 60 hauls per day = 120 trips per day" (Appendix B, pp. 15,38,85). However, this Justification remains insufficient for two reasons.

First, the "User Entered Comments and Non-Default Data" table fails to acknowledge the omission of construction hauling trips from the emissions analysis. Second, the DEIR and associated documents fail to provide the above-mentioned assumptions or mention the revised hauling trip numbers whatsoever.

This is incorrect, as according to the CalEEMod User's Guide:
"CalEEMod was also designed to allow the user to change the defaults to reflect site- or projectspecific information, when available, provided that the information is supported by substantial evidence as required by CEQA." ®
As such, until additional information becomes available that substantiates the revised hauling trip numbers, we are unable to verify the changes included in the models are an accurate reflection of the required number of hauling trips.

These unsubstantiated reductions present an issue, as CalEEMod uses the number of hauling trips to estimate the construction-related emissions associated with on-road vehicles.^" By omitting hauling trips ® "CalEEMod User's Guide." California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
httDs://www.aamd.gov/caleemod/user's-gulde. p. 1,14.
® "CalEEMod User's Guide." California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
httDs://www.aamd.gov/caleemod/user's-gulde. p. 13-14.
"CalEEMod User's Guide." California Air Pollution ControhOfflcers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
httDs://www.aamd.gov/caleemod/user's-gulde. p. 35.
from the emissions.ahalysis,^he models underestimate the Project's construction-related emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Unsubstantiated Reductions of Hauling, Vendor, and Worker Trip Lengths Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Cheval Blanc - Construction Onsite" modet includes several reductions to the default hauling, vendor, and worker trip lengths (see excerpt below)»^ (Appendix B, pp. 40-41).

Table Name
I
Column Name New Value
IbrrripsAndVMT HauIingT ripLength 20.00 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT HautingTripLength 20.00 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT
*iibrfri|SAnid^^
„4_..

HautingTripLength
HauIingTripLen^

20.00 20.00

0.00 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT HautingTripLength 20.00 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT HautingTripLength 20.00 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT HautingTripLength 20.00 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT HaulingTripl^ength 20.00 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT HautingTripLength 20.00 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.S0 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.S0 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.80 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT WorkerTrip Length 14.70 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT WoriterTripLenglh 14.70 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT WorfcerTripLength 14.70 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT WortcerTr^l^nglh 14.70 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 0.00
tbITripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 0.00
As you can see in the excerpt above, the hauling, vendor, and worker trip lengths were set to 0 miles. As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified." According to the "User Entered Comments and Non-Default Data" table, the justification provided for ' "CalEEMod User's.Guide." California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aamd.gov/caleemod/user's-euide. p. 1,14.
8 these changes is: "see assumptions. Demolition and Excavation would have up to 60 hauls per day = 120 trips per day" (Appendix B, pp. 38). However, this justification remains insufficient for two reasons.

First, the "User Entered Comments and Non-Default Data" table only references demolition and excavation hauling trips and fails to justify the changes to trip lengths. Second, the DEIR and associated documents fail to provide the above-mentioned assumptions or mention the-revised trip lengths whatsoever. This is incorrect, as according to the CalEEMod User's Guide:
"CalEEMod was also designed to allow the user to change the defaults to reflect site- or projectspecific information, when available, provided that the information is supported by substantial evidence as required by CEQA."
As such, until additional information becomes available that substantiates the revised hauling, vendor, and worker trip lengths, we are unable to verify the changes included in the models are an accurate reflection of the anticipated trip lengths. Furthermore, while we acknowledge this model is evaluating on-site emissions, the trip length is still greater than 0 miles.

These unsubstantiated reductions present an issue, as CalEEMod uses the hauling, vendor, and worker trips lengths to estimate the construction-related emissions associated with on-road vehicles." Thus, by including trip lengths of 0 miles, the model fails to calculate any emissions associated with required number of construction vehicles. As a result, the model underestimates the Project's constructionrelated emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Overestimated Reduction to Energy Use Value
Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the "Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations" and "Cheval Blanc - Operations (Without PDFs)" models include an unsubstantiated reduction to the default energy use value (see excerpt below) (Appendix B, pp. 16, 76,86).

Table Name 1 : Column Name 1
Default Value 1 New Value 1
tblEneigyUse 3.92 1 1
As demonstrated above, the Title 24 electricity energy intensity ("T24E") was reduced by 90%. As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified." According to the "User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data" table, the justification provided for this change is: "see GHG parameters" (Appendix B, pp. 15,75,85). Furthermore, regarding the changes to the default energy use values, the DEIR states:
" "CalEEMod User's Guide." California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
httDs://www.aamd.gov/caleemod/user's-euide. p. 13-14.
" "CalEEMod User's Guide." California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
httPs://www.aamd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide. p. 35.
" "CalEEMod User's Guide." California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aamd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide. p. 1,14.
"CalEEMod providesjadjustments to account for more stringent requirements under 2016 Title 24 building codes. Asidiscussed above, the Project would be subject to the 2019 Title 24 standards. Residential and nonresidential buildings built in compliance with the 2019 standards will use about 30 to5.3 percent less energy than those under the 2016 standards. This analysis conservatively includ^' a 10-percent reduction in the CalEEMod calculated energy use to account for compliahc^with 20l9 Title 24 standards" (p. 4.6-72).

However, these revised value remains unsupported, as the reduction to the T24E energy use value significantly exceeds the purported 10% reduction referenced in the DEIR. As such, the energy use value is inconsistent with information provided in the DEIR and underestimated in the models.

This unsubstantiated reduction presents an issue, as CalEEMod uses energy use values to calculate the Project's emissions associated with building electricity and non-hearth natural gas usage.^^ By including an unsubstantiated reduction to the default energy use value, the models may underestimate the Project's energy-source operational emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Updated Analysis Indicates a Potentially Significant Air Quality Impact In an effort to more accurately estimate Project's construction and operation-related emissions, we prepared an updated CalEEMod model, using the Project-specific information provided by the DEIR. In our updated model we omitted the unsubstantiated reductions to the energy-use value and hauling trip numbers. Furthermore, despite the fact that the DEIR's construction schedule and equipment list are unsubstantiated, we still included the changes present in the DEIR's model in our updated model due to the lack of a better alternative.^®
Our updated analysis estimates that the Project's construction-related NOx emissions exceed the applicable SCAQMD thresholds of 100 pounds per day {"lbs/day") {see table below)." SWAPE Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions
Construction NOx
DEIR 79.2
SWAPE 106.8
% Increase 35%
SCAQMD Threshold 100
Exceeds? Yes
" "CalEEMod User's Guide." California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aamd.eov/caleemod/user's-euide. p. 43.
" See Attachment B for updated modeling.
" "South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds." SCAQMD, April 2019, available at:
http://www.aamd.gov/docs/default-source/ceaa/handbook/scaQmd-air-aualitv-sienificance-thresholds.pdf. 10 As you can see in the excerpt above, the Project's construction-related NOx emissions, as^estlmated by SWAPE, Increase by approximately 35% and exceed the applicable SCAQMD significance thresholds.

Thus, our model demonstrates that the Project would result In a potentially significant air quality Impact that was not previously Identified or addressed In the DEIR. As a result, an updated EIR should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality Impacts th^at the Prcyect may have on the surrounding environment.

Diesel Particulate Matter Health Risk Emissions Inadequately Evaluated The DEIR concludes that the Project would have a less-than-slgnlflcant health risk Impact without conducting a quantified construction or operational health risk analysis {"HRA") (p. 4.1-60). Regarding the health risk Impacts associated with Project construction, the DEIR states:
"The greatest potential for TAC emissions during construction would be from diesel particulate ; emissions associated with heavy equipment operations. According to SCAQMD methodology, health effects from carcinogenic air toxics are usually described In terms of Individual cancer risk. "Individual Cancer Risk" Is the likelihood that a person continuously exposed to concentrations of TACs over a 70-year lifetime will contract cancer based on the use of standard risk assessment methodology. Given the short-term construction schedule of approximately 38 months, the Project would not result In a long-term (I.e., 70-year) source of TAC emissions.

Additionally, the SCAQMD CEQA guidance does not require a health risk assessment (HRA) for short-term construction emissions. It is, therefore, not necessary to evaluate long-term cancer Impacts from construction activities which occur over a relatively short duration. In addition, there would be no residual emissions or corresponding Individual cancer risk after construction as all construction equipment and trucks would no longer be operating on-slte. As such, Projectrelated TAC Impacts during construction would be less than significant" (p. 4.1-57).

As demonstrated above, the DEIR concludes that the Project would result In a less-than-slgnlflcant construction-related health risk Impact because the Project's short-term construction duration would not result In substantial amounts of toxic air contaminant ('TAC") emissions. Furthermore, regarding the health risk Impacts associated with Project operation, the DEIR states:
'The primary sources of potential air toxics associated with Project operations Include diesel particulate matter from delivery trucks (e.g., truck traffic on local streets and Idling on adjacent streets) and, to a lesser extent, facility operations (e.g., natural gas fired boilers, charbrollers).

However, these activities, and the land uses associated with the Project, are not considered land uses that generate substantial TAC emissions. It should be noted that the SCAQMD recommends that HRAs be conducted for substantial Individual sources of diesel particulate matter (e.g., truck stops and warehouse distribution facilities that generate more than 100 trucks per day or more than 40 trucks with operating transport refrigeration units) and has provided guidance for analyzing mobile source diesel emissions. The Project would not Include these types of land uses and Is not considered to be a substantial source of diesel particulate matter warranting a refined HRA since dally truck trips to the Project Site would not exceed 100 trucks per day or more than 40 trucks with operating transport refrigeration units. In addition, the CARB-mandated ATCM 11 limits diesel-fueled commerciaLvfihicles (delivery trucks) to idle for no more than five minutes at any given time, which would further limit diesel particulate emissions" (p. 4.1-60).

As demonstrated above, the DEIR concludes that the Project would result in a less-than-significant operational health risk impact because proposed land uses are not significant sources of TAC emissions or expected to generate ICQ truck trips. However, the DEIR's evaluation of the Project's potential health risk impacts, as well as the subsequent less-than-significant impact conclusion, is incorrect for three reasons.

First, by failing to prepare a quantified construction and operational HRA, the Project is inconsistent with CEQA's requirement to correlate the increase in emissions that the Project would generate to the adverse impacts on human health caused by those emissions.^® This is incorrect, as construction of the proposed Project would produce diesel particulate matter ("DPM") emissions through the exhaust stacks of construction equipment over a potential construction period of approximately 38 months (p.

2.0-27). Furthermore, the DEIR indicates that the Project would generate approximately 2,360 daily vehicle trips, which would generate additional exhaust emissions and continue to expose nearby sensitive receptors to DPM emissions during Project operation (p. 4.9-28). However, the DEIR fails to evaluate Project-generated TACs or indicate the concentrations at which such pollutants would trigger adverse health effects. Thus, without making a reasonable effort to connect the Project's constructionrelated and operational TAC emissions to the potential health risks posed to nearby receptors, the DEIR is inconsistent with CEQA's requirement to correlate the increase in emissions generated by the Project with the potential adverse impacts on human health.

Second, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment ("OEHHA"), the organization responsible for providing guidance on conducting HRAs in California, released its most recent Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments in February 2015.^® This guidance document describes the types of projects that warrant the preparation of an HRA. The OEHHA document recommends that all short-term projects lasting at least two months be evaluated for cancer risks to nearby sensitive receptors. As the Project's construction duration exceeds the 2-month requirement set forth by OEHHA, it is clear that the Project meets the threshold warranting a quantified HRA under OEHHA guidance. Furthermore, the OEHHA document recommends that exposure from projects lasting more than 6 months be evaluated for the duration of the Project and recommends that an exposure duration of 30 years be used to estimate individual cancer risk for the maximally exposed individual resident ("MEIR"). Even though we were not provided with the expected lifetime of the Project, we can reasonably assume that the Project will operate for at least 30 years, if not more.

Therefore, we recommend that health risk impacts from Project operation also be evaluated, as a 30- year exposure duration vastly exceeds the 6-month requirement set forth by OEHHA. These recommendations reflect the most recent state health risk policies, and as such, we recommend that an "Sierra Club v. County of Fresno." Supreme Court of California, December 2018, available at:
https://ceaaportal.org/decisions/1907/Sierra%20Club%20v.%20Countv%20of%20Fresno.Ddf. " "Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.Eov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. 12 analysis of health risk impacts posed to nearby sensitive receptors from Project-generated DPM emissions be included in an updated EIR for the Project.

Third} by claiming a less than significant impact without conducting a quantified construction or opei^tional HRA for nearby, existing sensitive receptors, the DEIR fails to compare the exjcess health risk impact to the SCAQMD's specific numeric threshold of 10 in one million.^" Thus, in accordance with^he most relevant guidance, an assessment of the health risk posed to nearby, existing receptors from Project construction and operation should have been conducted.

Screening-Level Analysis Demonstrates Significant Impacts In order to conduct our screening-level risk assessment we relied upon AERSCREEN, which is a screening level air quality dispersion model.^^ The model replaced SCREENS, and AERSCREEN is included In the OEHHA^^ and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Associated ("CAPCOA")^^ guidance as the appropriate air dispersion model for Level 2 health risk screening assessments ("HRSAs"). A Level 2 HRSA utilizes a limited amount of site-specific information to generate maximum reasonable downwind concentrations of air contaminants to which nearby sensitive receptors may be exposed. If an unacceptable air quality hazard is determined to be possible using AERSCREEN, a more refined modeling approach is required prior to approval of the Project.

We prepared a preliminary HRA of the Project's construction and operational health risk impact to residential sensitive receptors using the annual PMio exhaust estimates from the SWAPE's CalEEMod output files. Consistent with recommendations set forth by OEHHA, we assumed residential exposure begins during the third trimester stage of life. SWAPE's construction CalEEMod emissions indicate that construction activities will generate approximately 663 pounds of DPM over the 1,156-day construction period.^'^The AERSCREEN model relies on a continuous average emission rate to simulate maximum downward concentrations from point, area, and volume emission sources. To account for the variability in equipment usage and truck trips over Project construction, we calculated an average DPM emission rate by the following equation:
/grams\ 663Albs 453.6 orams Iday Ihour
Emission Rate I -) = ^ . x x —— x t- = 0.00301 0/5
^second^ 1,156 days lbs 24 hours 3,600 seconds
Using this equation, we estimated a construction emission rate of 0.00301 grams per second ("g/s").

Subtracting the 1,156-day construction period from the total residential duration of 30 years, we assumed that after Project construction, the sensitive receptor would be exposed to the Project's "South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds." SCAQMD, April 2019, available at:
http://www.aamd.gov/docs/default-source/ceaa/handbook/scaamd-air-aualitv-significance-thresholds.pdf. " U.S. EPA (April 2011) AERSCREEN Released as the EPA Recommended Screening Model, http://www.epa.gbv/ttn/scram/guidance/clarification/20110411 AERSCREEN Release Memo.pdf " OEHHA (February 2015) Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. ^ CAPCOA (July 2009) Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects, http://www.capcba.org/wpcontEnt/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA HRA LU Guidelines 8-6-09.pdf. ^ See Attachment B for calculations.
13 operational DPM for an additional 26.83 years. SWARE's operational CalEEMod emissions indicate that operational activities will generate approximately 111 pounds of DPM per year throughout operation.

Applying the same equation used to estimate the construction DPM rate, we estimated the following emission rate for Project operation:
„ . „ /grams\ 110.8 lbs 453.6 omms Itiay Ihour
Emission Rate I r) = x 77 x — x —— — = 0.001S9 g/s
^second'^ 365 days lbs -' labours 3,600 seconds
Using this equation, we estimated an operational emission rate of 0.00159 g/s. Construction and operation were simulated as a 1.277-acre rectangular area source in AERSCREEN, with approximate dimensions of 102- by 51-meters. A release height of three meters was selected to represent the height of stacks of operational equipment and other heavy-duty vehicles, and an initial vertical dimension of one and a half meters was used to simulate instantaneous plume dispersion upon release. An urban meteorological setting was selected with model-default inputs for wind speed and direction distribution.

The population of Beverly Hills was obtained from U.S. 2020 Census data.^® The AERSCREEN model generates maximum reasonable estimates of single-hour DPM concentrations from the Project Site. EPA guidance suggests that in screening procedures, the annualized average concentration of an air pollutant to be estimated by multiplying the single-hour concentration by 10%.^^ According to the DEIR the nearest sensitive receptor is a pre-school located approximately 280 feet, or 85 meters, from the Project site (p. 4.1-27). Thus, the single-hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN for Project construction is approximately 9.192 pg/m^ DPM at approximately 75 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%, vi7e get an annualized average concentration of 0.9192 pg/m^ for Project construction at the MEIR. For Project operation, the singlehour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN is 4.861 pg/m' DPM at approximately 75 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of 0.4861 pg/m^ for Project operation at the MEIR.

We calculated the excess cancer risk to the MEIR using applicable HRA methodologies prescribed by OEHHA, as recommended by SCAQMD." Consistent with the 1,156-day construction schedule, the annualized average concentration for construction was used for the entire third trimester of pregnancy (0.25 years), the entire infantile stage of life (0-2 ye^rs), and the first 0.92 years of the child stage of life (2 -16 years). The annualized average concentration for operation was used for the remainder of the 30-year exposure period, which makes up the latter 13.08 years of the child stage of life and the entire adult stage of life (16-30 years).
"Fountain Valley." U.S. Census Bureau, 2020, available at: https://datacommons.org/pl3ce/geold/0606308. 26 "Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources Revised." U.S. EPA, October 1992, available at: http://www.epa.eov/ttn/scram/euidance/guide/EPA-454R-92-019 OCR.pdf. ^ "Supplemental Guidelines for Submission of Rule 1200 Health Risk Assessments (HRAs)." SDAPCD, July 2019, available at: r'
https://www.sandieeocountv.eov/content/dam/sdc/apcd/PDF/Toxics Proeram/APCD 1200 Supplemental GuideL ines.pdf.
14 Consistent wltbCEHHA guidance, as recommended by SCAQMD, we used Age Sensitivity Factors ^ ("ASF(s)") to account for the heightened susceptibility of young children to the carcinogenic toxicity of air pollution.^® According to this guidance, the quantified cancer risk should be multiplied by a factorof ten during the third trimester of pregnancy and during the first two years of life (infant) as well as multiplied by a'flctor of three during the child stage of life (2 -16 years). Furthermore, in accordanciel with guidance slfforth byiDEHHA, we used the 95*'' percentile breathing rates for children from the^'i^ trimester through age 2.^® Finally, consistent with OEHHA guidance, we used a Fraction of Time At Home ("FAN") Value of 1 for the 3*'' trimester, infant, and child receptors, and a value of 0.73 for the adult receptors.®" We used a cancer potency factorof 1.1 (mg/kg-day)'* and an averaging time of 25,550 days.

The results of our calculations are shown in the tables below.

The Maximally Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor Age Group
Emissions
Source
Duration
(years)
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Breathing
Rate (L/kg-day)
Cancer Risk
(without ASFs*)
ASF
Cancer Risk
(with ASFs*)
3rd Trimester Construction 0.25 0.9192 361 1.25 E-06 10 1.25E-G5 Infant
(Age 0-2)
Construction 2 0.9192 1090 3.02E-05 10 3.02E-04
Construction 0.92 0.9192 572 7.27E-06
Operation 13.08 0.4861 572 5.48E-05
Child
(Age 2 -16)
Total 14 6.21E-05 3 1.86E-04
Adult
(Age 16 - 30)
Operation 14 0.4861 261 1.95 E-05 1 1.95E-05
Lifetime 30 1.13E-04 5.20E-04
* We, along with CARB and SCAQMD, recommend using the more updated and health protective 2015 OEHHA guidance, which inciudes ASFs. "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: httDs://oehha.ca.eov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.Ddf. " "AB 2588 and Rule 1402 Supplemental Guidelines (Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessments for the Air Toxics 'Hot Spots' Information and Assessment Act)." SCAQMD, October 2020, http://www.aamd.gov/docs/default-source/Dlannine/risk-assessment/ab2588-risk-assessmentguidelines.pdf?sfarsn=6. p. 19; see also:" Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015 - guidancemanual.pdf.
"Risk Assessment Procedures for Rules 1401,1401.1, and 212." SCAQMD, September 2017, available at:
http://www.aQmd.gOv/docs/default-source/permitting/rule-1401-risk-assessment/riskassessproc-v8- l.pdf?sfvrsn=12. p. 7.
15 As demonstrated in the table above, the excess cancer risks forthe 3'^'' trimester of pregnancy, infants, children, and adults at the MEIR located approximately 75 meters away, over the course of Project construction and operation, utilizing ASFs, are approximately 123,302,186, and 19.5 In one million, respectively. The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years), utilizing ASFs, Is approximately 520 In one million. The 3"' trimester of pregnancy^ Infant, child, adult, and lifetime cancer risks exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 In one million, thus rlisiJItlng In a potentially significant Impact not previously addressed or Identified by the DEIR.

Utilizing ASFs Is the most conservative, health-protective analysis according to the most recent guidance by OEHHA and reflects recommendations from the air district. Results without ASFs are presented In the table above, although we do not recommend utilizing these values for health risk analysis. Regardless, the excess cancer risks for the 3"* trimester of pregnancy. Infants, children, and adults at the MEIR located approximately 75 meters away, over the course of Project construction and operation, without ASFs, are approximately 1.25,30.2, 62.1, and 19.5 In one million, respectively. The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime, without ASFs, Is approximately 113 In one million. The Infant, child, adult, and lifetime cancer risks exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 In one million, thus resulting In a potentially significant Impact not previously addressed or Identified by the DEIR. While we recommend the use of ASFs, the Project's cancer risk without ASFs, as estimated by SWAPE, exceeds the SCAQMD threshold regardless.

An agency must Include an analysis of health risks that connects the Project's air emissions with the health risk posed by those emissions. Our analysis represents a screening-level HRA, which Is known to be conservative and tends to err on the side of health protection. The purpose of the screening-level construction and operational HRA shown above Is to demonstrate the link between the proposed Project's emissions and the potential health risk. Our screening-level HRA demonstrates that construction and operation of the Project could result In a potentially significant health risk Impact, when correct exposure assumptions and up-to-date, applicable guidance are used. Thus, an updated EIR should be prepared. Including a quantified air pollution model as well as an updated, quantified refined health risk assessment which adequately and accurately evaluates health risk Impacts associated with both Project construction and operation.

Greenhouse Gas
Failure to Adequately Evaluate Greenhouse Gas Impacts
The DEIR estimates that the Project would generate net annual greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions of 1,966 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per year ("MT COae/year") (p. 4.6-71, Table 4.6-10). 16 V - Table 4.6-10
Annual GHG Emissions Summary (Project)®
(metric tons of cartion dioxide equivalent [MTCOze])
Scope
Existing
Emissions
Project
Without
Reduction
Features
Project with
Reduction
Features
Net Change
(Project
Without
Reduction
Features -
Baseline)
Net Change
(Project WKh
Reduction
Features -
Baseline)
Area<= <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Energy 68 991 954 922 886
Mobile® 359 2911 1,172 2,552 813
Stationary' <1 1 1 1 1
Solid Wastes 6 65 65 58 58
Water/Wastewater*^ 8 46 46 38 . 38
Construction <1 170 170 170 170
Total Emissions 442 4183 2,408 3,741 1,966
As a result the DEIR concludes:
"As noted above, while there are no local, regional, or statewide significance thresholds to measure GHG impacts for mixed-use project, the SCAQMD has proposed a draft screening criterion of 3,000 MTCOae/yr for mixed-use projects to determine whether a land use project could presumptively have less than significant GHG impacts if it produced less GHGs than the screening criteria. As discussed above, the Project's estimated annual emissions would be 1,966 MTC02e per year. Thus, the Project's GHG annual emissions would not exceed the 2008 SCAQMD draft screening threshold of significance of 3,000 MTCOze per year" (p. 4.6-74 - 4.6- 75).

Furthermore, the DEIR's analysis relies upon the Project's consistency with CARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS Strategies, and the City's General Plan and Sustainable City Plan (p. 4.6-51-4.6-64). However, the DEIR's analysis, as well as the subsequent less-than-significant impact conclusion, is incorrect for five reasons.
(1) The DEIR's quantitative GHG analysis relies upon an incorrect and unsubstantiated air model; (2) The DEIR's quantitative GHG analysis relies upon an outdated threshold; (3) The DEIR fails to identify a potentially significant greenhouse gas impact; (4) The DEIR fails to consider the performance-based standards under CARB's Scoping Plan; and (5) The DEIR fails to consider the performance-based standards under SCAG's RTP/SCS. [1] Incorrect and Unsubstantiated Quantitative Analysis of Emissions As previously stated, DEIR estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 1,996 MT C02e/year (p. 4.6-71, Table 4.6-10). However, the DEIR's quantitative GHG analysis is unsubstantiated. As previously discussed, when we reviewed the Project's CalEEMod output files, provided in the AQ & GHG Report as Appendix B to the DEIR, we found that several of the values 17 inputted Into the model are not consistent with Information disclosed In the DEIR. As a-result, the model underestimates the Project's emissions, and the DEIR's quantitative GHG analysis should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. An EIR should be prepared that adequately assesses the potential GHG Impacts that construction and operation of the proposed Project may have on the surrounding environment.
(2] Incorrect Reliance on an Outdated Quantitative GHG Threshold As previously stated, DEIR estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 1,966 MT COae/year, which would not exceed the SCAQMD bright-line threshold of 3,000 MT COae/year (p.

4.6-71, Table 4.6-10). However, the guidance that provided the 3,000 MT COae/year threshold, the SCAQMD's 2008 Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules, and Plans report, was developed when the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, commonly known as "AB 32", was the governing statute for GHG reductions In California. AB 32 requires California to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020." However, AEP guidance states:
"[F]or evaluating projects with a post 2020 horizon, the threshold will need to be revised based on a new gap analysis that would examine 17 development and reduction potentials out to the next GHG reduction milestone.""
As It Is currently February 2022, thresholds for 2020 are not applicable to the proposed Project and should be revised to reflect the current GHG reduction target. As such, the SCAQMD bright-line threshold of 3,000 MT COze/year Is outdated and inapplicable to the proposed Project, and the DEIR's less-than-slgnlflcant GHG Impact conclusion should not be relied upon. Instead, we recommend that the Project apply the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT COze/year, which was calculated by applying a 40% reduction to the 2020 targets."
(3) Failure to Identify a Potentially Significant GHG Impact When applying the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT COze/SP/year, the Project's Incorrect and unsubstantiated air model Indicates a potentially significant GHG Impact." As previously stated, the DEIR estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 1,996 MT COze/year (p.

4.6-71, Table 4.6-10). According to CAPCOA's CEQA & Climate Change report, a service population Is defined as "the sum of the number of residents and the number of jobs supported by the project."" The " HEALTH & SAFETY CODE 38550, available at:
https://leginfo.leglslature.ca.gov/faces/codes d}splavSection.xhtml?lawCode=HSC&sectlonNum=38550. " "Beyond Newhall and 2020: A Field Guide to New CEQA Greenhouse Gas Thresholds and Climate Action Plan Targets for California." Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP), October 2016, available at:
https://califaep.org/docs/AEP-2016 Final White Paoer.pdf. p. 39. " "Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #15." SCAQMD, September 2010, available at: http://www.aamd.gov/docs/default-source/ceQa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceaasigriificance-thresholds/vear-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-15/ghg-meeting-15-minutes.pdf. p. 2. ^ "Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #15." SCAQMD, September 2010, available at: http://www.aamd.gov/docs/default-source/ceaa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghgl-ceaasignificance-thresholds/vear-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-15/ghg-meeting-15-minutes.pdf. p. 2. " CAPCOA /Jan. 2008) CEQA & Climate Change, p. 71-72, http://www.capcoa.org/wpcontent/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA-White-Paper.pdf. 18 DEIR indicates that the Project would;gerierate approximately 250 employees {p. 4.1-46). Thus, as the Project does not propose any residential land uses, we estimate a service population of 250 people.^® When dividing the Project's net annuaLGHG emissions, as estimated by the DEIR, by a service population of 250 people, we find that the Project>would emit approximately 8.0 MI COae/SP/year (see table below)."
DEIR Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Annual Emissions (MT COae/year) 1,996
Service Population 250
Service Population Efficiency (MT C02e/SP/year) 8.0
SCAQMD Population Efficiency 2035 Target 3.0
Exceeds? Yes
As demonstrated above, the Project's service population efficiency value exceeds the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT COae/SP/year, indicating a potentially significant impact not previously identified or addressed by the DEIR. As a result, the DEIR's less-than-significant GHG impact conclusion should not be relied upon. An updated EIR should be prepared, including an updated GHG analysis and incorporating additional mitigation measures to reduce the Project's GHG emissions to less-thansignificant levels. [4] Failure to Consider Performance-based Standards Under CARB's 2017 Scoping Plan As previously discussed, the DEIR relies upon the Project's consistency with CARB's 2017 Scoping Plan to determine Project GHG significance (p. 4.6-51 - 4.6-64). However, this is incorrect, as the DEIR fails to consider performance-based measures proposed by GARB.
/. Passenger & Light Duty VMT Per Capita Benchmarks per SB 375 In reaching the State's long-term GHG emission reduction goals, CARB's 2017 Scoping Plan explicitly cites to SB 375 and the VMT reductions anticipated under the implementation of Sustainable Community Strategies.^® CARB has identified the population and daily VMT from passenger autos and light-duty vehicles at the state and county level for each year between 2010 to 2050 under a "baseline scenario" that includes "current projections of VMT included in the existing Regional Transportation Plans/Sustainable Communities Strategies (RTP/SCSs) adopted by the State's 18 Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) pursuant to SB 375 as of 2015."®® By dividing the projected daily VMT by the Calculated: 0 residents + 250 employees = 250 service population. " Calculated: (1,996 MT C02e/year) / (250 service population) = (8.0 MT C02e/SP/year). ^ "California's 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan." CARB, November 2017, available at:
httos://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping plan "2017.Ddf. p. 25,98,101-103. "Supporting Calculations for 2017 Scoping Plan-ldeiitified VMT Reductions," Excel Sheet "Readme." CARB, January 2019. available at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sltes/default/files/2019- ^ 01/sp mss vmt calculations ianl9 O.xisx.
19 population, we calculated the daily VMT per capita for each year at the state and county level for-2010 (baseline year), 2026 (Project operational year), and 2030 (target years under SB 32) (see table below). r-. 2017 Scoping Plan Daily VMT Per Capita
• Los Angeles County Stajt^
Year Population LDVVMT Baseline VMT Per Capita Population LDVVMT Baseline VMT Per Capita 2010 9,838,771 216,979,222.64 22.05 37,335,085 836,463,980.46 22.40 2026 10,714,109 217,309,805.92 20.28 42,655,695 935,625,476.00 21.93 2030 10,868,614 215,539,586.12 19.83 43,939,250 957,178,153.19 21.78 As the DEIR fails to evaluate the Project's consistency with the CARE 2017 Scoping Plan performancebased daily VMT per capita projections, the DEIR's claim that the proposed Project would not conflict with the GARB 2017 Scoping Plan is unsupported. An updated EIR should be prepared for the proposed Project to provide additional information and analysis to conclude less-than-significant GHG impacts. (5) Failure to Consider Performance-based Standards Under SCAG'S RTP/SCS As previously discussed, the DEIR concludes that the Project would be consistent with SCAG's RTP/SCS (p. 4.6-51-4.6-64). However, the DEIR fails to consider whether or not the Project meets any of the specific performance-based goals underlying SCAG's RTP/SCS and SB 375, such as: i) per capita GHG emission targets, or ii) daily vehicles miles traveled ("VMT") per capita benchmarks. /. SB 375 Per Capita GHG Emission Goals
SB 375 was signed into law in September 2008 to enhance the State's ability to reach AB 32 goals by directing GARB to develop regional 2020 and 2035 GHG emission reduction targets for passenger vehicles (autos and light-duty trucks). In March 2018, GARB adopted updated regional targets requiring a 19 percent decrease in VMT for the SGAG region by 2035. This goal is reflected in SCAG's 2020 RTP/SCS Program Environmental Impact Report ("PEIR"), in which the 2020 RTP/SCS PEIR updates the per capita emissions to 18.8 lbs/day in 2035 (see excerpt below).''" "Connect SoCal Certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report." SCAG, May 2020, available at: i https://scag.ca.eov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/fDeir connectsocal complete.pdf?1607981618. p. 3.8-74. 20 Tifiie 3.8-10
SB 3Z§ Analysis.
2085 (Baseline) 2020 (Flan) 2035 (Plan)
Resident p(>pubtion (per l.UtIO)
C02 emUsions (per l.UOO tons)
Cer capita emi&sions (pounds/day)
% difference from Plan (2U2t}) to Baseline (2(X)5)
% differeitce from Plan (2035) to Baseline (2UU5)
17,161
2O4J0-

23.8 ly.iw
21H3»>

21.3 21.1111
198.6/b/

18.8 -8%
Sou-:
lal Boifd All LWACIOO?
fb/Baxd en LMFAC2014 anJ SC/IG nwJding, 2019.

Id Includm eff-im»dW adjustmenti: for 2035 and 2045
Stmrce: SC/AC modeling, 2019.
hltp://nntv.!<ao.ca.nn^l(vmmitteest/CommUieeDocUbrarv/wintRCPCll(G15fuUaon.t>df As the DEIR fails to evaluate the Project's consistency with the SCAG's per capita emissions, the DEIR's claim that the proposetd Project would not conflict with SCAG's RTP/SCS is unsupported. An updated EIR should be prepared for the proposed Project to provide additional information and analysis to conclude less-than-significant GHG impacts.
//. SB 375 RTP/SCS Daily VMT Per Capita Target
Under the SCAG's 2020 RTP/SCS, daily VMT per capita in the SCAG region should decrease from 23.2 VMT in 2016 to 20.7 VMT by 2045.^^ Daily VMT per capita in Los Angeles County should decrease from

22.2 to 19.2 VMT during that same period."^ Here, however, the DEIR fails to consider any of the abovementioned performance-based VMT targets. As the DEIR fails to evaluate the Project's consistency with the SCAG's performance-based daily VMT per capita projections, the DEIR's claim that the proposed Project would not conflict with SCAG's RTP/SCS is unsupported. An updated EIR should be prepared for the proposed Project to provide additional information and analysis to conclude less-than-significant GHG impacts.

Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions Our analysis demonstrates that the Project would result in potentially significant air quality, health risk, and GHG impacts that should be mitigated further. As such, in an effort to reduce the Project's emissions, we identified several mitigation measures that are applicable to the proposed Project.

Therefore, to reduce the Project's emissions, we recommend consideration of SCAG's 2020 RTP/SCS PEIR's Air Quality Project Level Mitigation Measures ("PMM-AQ-1") and Greenhouse Gas Project Level Mitigation Measures ("PMM-GHG-1"), as described below:
"Connect SoCal." SCAG, September 2020, available at: https://scag.ca.gov/sltes/main/files/fileattachments/0903fconnectsocal-plan 0.pdf?1606001176. pp. 138. "Connect SoCal." SCAG, September 2020, available at: https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/fileattachments/0903fconnectsocal-plan 0.pdf?1606001176. pp. 138;'== "4.0 Mitigation Measures." Connect SoCal Program Environmental Impact Report Addendum #1, September 2020, available at: https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file21 SCAG RTP/SGS 2020-2045 'I"
Air Quality Project Level Mitigation Measures - PMM-AQ-1:

In accordance with provisions of sections 15091(a)(2) and 15126.4(a)(1)(B) of the State CEQAi Guidelines, a Lead Agency for a project can and should consider mitigation measures to reduce^ substantial-adverse effects related to violating air quality standards. Such measures may include the following or other comparable measures identified by the Lead Agency:
a) Minimize land disturbance.
b) Suspend grading and earth moving when wind gusts exceed 25 miles per hour unless the soil is wet enough to prevent dust plumes.
c) Cover trucks when hauling dirt.
d) Stabilize the surface of dirt piles if not removed immediately. e) Limit vehicular paths on linpaved surfaces and stabilize any temporary roads. f) Minimize unnecessary vehicular and machinery activities. g) Sweep paved streets at least once per day where there is evidence of dirt that has been carried on to the roadway.
h) Revegetate disturbed land, including vehicular paths created during construction to avoid future off-road vehicular activities.
i) On Caltrans projects, Caltrans Standard Specifications 10-Dust Control, 17-Watering, and 18-Dust Palliative shall be incorporated into project specifications.
j) Require contractors to assemble a comprehensive inventory list (i.e., make, model, engine year, horsepower, emission rates) of all heavy-duty off-road (portable and mobile) equipment (50 horsepower and greater) that could be used an aggregate of 40 or more hours for the construction project. Prepare a plan for approval by the applicable air district demonstrating achievement of the applicable percent reduction for a CARB-approved fleet.
k) Ensure that all construction equipment is properly tuned and maintained.

I) Minimize idling time to 5 minutes—saves fuel and reduces emissions. m) Provide an operational water truck on-site at all times. Use watering trucks to minimize dust; watering should be sufficient to confine dust plumes to the project work areas. Sweep paved streets at least once per day where there is evidence of dirt that has been carried on to the roadway. n) Utilize existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean fuel generators rather than temporary power generators.
o) Develop a traffic plan to minimize traffic flow interference from construction activities. The plan may include advance public notice of routing, use of public transportation, and satellite parking areas with a shuttle service.

Schedule operations affecting traffic for off-peak hours. Minimize obstruction of through-traffic lanes. Provide a flag person to guide traffic properly and ensure safety at construction sites. p) As appropriate require that portable engines and portable engine-driven equipment units used at the project work site, with the exception of on-road and off-road motor vehicles, obtain CARB Portable Equipment Registration with the state or a local district permit. Arrange appropriate consultations with the CARB or the District to determine registration and permitting requirements prior to equipment operation at the site. attachments/foeir connectsocal addendum 4 mitigationmeasures.Ddf?1606004420. p. 4.0-2 - 4.0-10; 4.0<19 -

4.0-23; See also: "Certified final Connect SoCal Program Environmental Impact Report." Southern CaliforniaAssociation of Governments (SCAG), May 2020, available at: httDs://scag.ca.gov/peir. 22 q) Require projects within 500 feet of residences, hospitals, or schools to use Tier 4 equipment for all engines above 50 horsepower (hp) unless the individual project can demonstrate that Tier 4 engines would not be required to mitigate emissions below significance thresholds. ~ r) Projects located within the South Coast Air Basin should consider applying for South Coast AQMD "SOON" funds which provides funds to applicable fleets for the purchase of commercially available low-emission heavyduty engines to achieve near-term reduction of NOx emissions from in-use off-road diesel vehicles. s) Projects located within AB 617communities should reviewtheapplicableCommunity Emissions Reduction Plan (CERP) for additional mitigation that can be applied to individoal projects. t) Where applicable, projects should provide information about air quality related programs to schools, including the Environmental Justice Community Partnerships (EJCP), Clean Air Ranger Education (CARE), and Why Air Quality Matters programs.
u) Projects should work with local cities and counties to install adequate signage that prohibits truck idling in certain locations (e.g., near schools and sensitive receptors). v) As applicable for airport projects, the following measures should be considered... w) As applicable for port projects, the following measures should be considered:

Develop specific timelines for transitioning to zero emission cargo handling equipment (CHE) Develop interim performance standards with a minimum amount of CHE replacement each year to ensure adequate progress.

Use short side electric power for ships, which may include tugboats and other ocean-going vessels or develop incentives to gradually ramp up the usage of shore power.

Install the appropriate infrastructure to provide shore power to operate the ships. Electrical hookups should be appropriately sized.

Maximize participation in the Port of Los Angeles' Vessel Speed Reduction Program or the Port of Long Beach's Green Flag Initiation Program in order to reduce the speed of vessel transiting within 40 nautical miles of Point Fermin.

Encourage the participation in the Green Ship Incentives.

Offer incentives to encourage the use of on-dock rail.
x) As applicable for rail projects, the following measures should be considered... y) Projects that will introduce sensitive receptors within 500 feet of freeways and other sources should consider installing high efficiency of enhanced filtration units, such as Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV) 13 or better. Installation of enhanced filtration units can be verified during occupancy inspection prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit.
z) Develop an ongoing monitoring, inspection, and maintenance program for the MERV filters. aa) Consult the SCAG Environmental Justice Toolbox for potential measures to address impacts to low-income and/or minority communities.
bb) The following criteria related to diesel emissions shall be implemented on by individual project sponsors as appropriate and feasible:

Diesel nonroad vehicles on site for more than 10 total days shall have either (1) engines that meet EPA on road emissions standards or (2) emission control technology verified by EPA or GARB to reduce PM emissions by a minimum of 85%
Diesel generators on site for more than 10 total days shall be equipped with emission control technology verified by EPA or GARB to reduce PM emissions by a minimum of 85%.

Nonroad diesei engines on site shall be Tier 2 or higher.

Diesel nonroad construction equipment on site for more than 10 total days shall have either (1) engines meeting EPA Tier 4 nonroad emissions standards or (2) emission control technology verified by EPA or GARB for use with nonroad engines to reduce PM emissions by a minimum of 85% for engines for 50 hp and greater and by a minimum of 20% for engines less than 50 hp.

Emission control technology shall be operated, maintained, and serviced as recommended by the emission control technology manufacturer.
23 Diesel vehlcles,:eonstruction equipment, and generators on site shall be fueled with ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel (ULSD) or a biodiesel blend approved by the original engine manufacturer with sulfur content of 15 ppm or less.

The constructiorixontractor shall maintain a list of all diesel vehicles, construction equipment, and generators to be used on site. The list shall include the following:
i. Contractor and subcontractor name and address, plus contact person responsible for the vehicles:©? equipment.
ii. Equipment type, equipment manufacturer, equipment serial number, engine manufacturer, engine model year, engine certification (Tier rating), horsepower, engine serial number, and expected fuel usage and hours of operation.
iii. For the emission control technology installed: technology type, serial number, make, model, manufacturer, EPA/CARB verification number/level, and installation date and hour-meter reading on installation date.

The contractor shall establish generator sites and truck-staging zones for vehicles waiting to load or unload material on site. Such zones shall be located where diesel emissions have the least impact on abutters, the general public, and especially sensitive receptors such as hospitals, schools, daycare facilities, elderly housing, and Convalescent facilities.

The contractor shall maintain a monthly report that, for each on road diesel vehicle, nonroad construction equipment, or generator onsite, includes:
i. Hour-meter readings on arrival on-site, the first and last day of every month, and on off-site date.
ii. Any problems with the equipment or emission controls. iii. Certified copies of fuel deliveries for the time period that identify:

1. Source of supply

2. Quantity of fuel

3. Quantity of fuel, including sulfur content (percent by weight) cc) Project should exceed Title-24 Building Envelope Energy Efficiency Standards (California Building Standards Code). The following measures can be used to increase energy efficiency:

Provide pedestrian network improvements, such as interconnected street network, narrower roadways and shorter block lengths, sidewalks, accessibility to transit and transit shelters, traffic calming measures, parks and public spaces, minimize pedestrian barriers.

Provide traffic calming measures, such as:
i. Marked crosswalks
ii. Count-down signal timers
iii. Curb extensions iv. Speed tables
iv. Raised crosswalks
V. Raised intersections
vi. Median islands
vii. Tight corner radii
viii. Roundabouts or mini-circles
ix. On-street parking
X. Chicanes/chokers
Create urban non-motorized zones
Provide bike parking in non-residential and multi-unit residential projects Dedicate land for bike trails
Limit parking supply through:
i. Elimination (or reduction) of minimum parking requirements ii. Creation of maximum'parking requirements
iii. Provision of shared parking
Require residential area parking permit.

Provide ride-sharing programs
L Designate a certain percentage of parking spacing for ride sharing vehicles 24 II.

III.
iv.

Designating adequate passenger loading and unloading and waiting areas for ride-sharing vehicles
Providing a web site or messaging board for coordinating rides Permanent transportation management association membership and finding requirement.

Greenhouse Gas Project Level Mitigation Measures t PMM-GHG-I In accordance with provisions of sections 15091(a)(2) and 15126.4(^)(1)(B) of the State CEQA Guidelines, a Lead Agency for a project can and should consider mitigation measures to reduce substantial adverse effects related to violating air quality standards. Such measures may include the following or other comparable measures identified by the Lead Agency:
b) Reduce emissions resulting from projects through implementation of project features, project design, or other measures, such as those described in Appendix F of the State CEQA Guidelines. c) Include off-site measures to mitigate a project's emissions. d) Measures that consider incorporation of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) during design, construction and operation of projects to minimize GHG emissions, including but not limited to:
i. Use energy and fuel-efficient vehicles and equipment; ii. Deployment of zero- and/or near zero emission technologies; iii. Use lighting systems that are energy efficient, such as LED technology; iv. Use the minimum feasible amount of GHG-emitting construction materials; V. Use cement blended with the maximum feasible amount of flash or other materials that reduce GHG emissions from cement production;
vi. Incorporate design measures to reduce GHG emissions from solid waste management through encouraging solid waste recycling and reuse;
vii. Incorporate design measures to reduce energy consumption and increase use of renewable energy;
viii. Incorporate design measures to reduce water consumption; ix. Use lighter-colored pavement where feasible;
X. Recycle construction debris to maximum extent feasible; xi. Plant shade trees in or near construction projects where feasible; and xii. Solicit bids that include concepts listed above.
e) Measures that encourage transit use, carpooling, bike-share and car-share programs, active transportation, and parking strategies, including, but not limited to the following:
i. Promote transit-active transportation coordinated strategies; ii. Increase bicycle carrying capacity on transit and rail vehicles; iii. Improve or increase access to transit;
iv. Increase access to common goods and services, such as groceries, schools, and day care; V. Incorporate affordable housing into the project;
vi. Incorporate the neighborhood electric vehicle network; vii. Orient the project toward transit, bicycle and pedestrian facilities; viii. Improve pedestrian or bicycle networks, or transit service; ix. Provide traffic calming measures;
X. Provide bicycle parking;
xi. Limit or eliminate park supply;
xii. Unbundle parking costs; -
xiii. Provide parking cash-out programs;
25 XIV. Implement or provide access to commute reduction program; f) Incorporate bicycle and pedestrian facilities into project designs, maintaining these facilities, and providing amenities incentivizing their use; and planning for and building local bicycle projects that connect with the regional network;
g) Improving transit access to rail and bus routes by incentives for construction and transit facilities within developments, and/or providing dedicated shuttle service to transit stations; and h) Adopting employer trip reduction measures to reduce employee trips such as vanpool and carpool programs, providing end-of-trip facilities, and telecommuting programs including but not limited to measures that:

Provide car-sharing, bike sharing, and ride-sharing programs; Provide transit passes;
Shift single occupancy vehicle trips to carpooling or vanpooling, for example providing ridematching services; Provide incentives or subsidies that increase that use of modes other than single-occupancy vehicle;
Provide on-site amenities at places of work, such as priority parking for carpools and vanpools, secure bike parking, and showers and locker rooms;
vi. Provide employee transportation coordinators at employment sites; vii. Provide a guaranteed ride home service to users of non-auto modes.

I.
ii.
in.

V.
i) Designate a percentage of parking spaces for ride-sharing vehicles or high-occupancy vehicles, and provide adequate passenger loading and unloading for those vehicles; j) Land use siting and design measures that reduce GHG emissions, including:
i. Developing on infill and brownfields sites;
Building compact and mixed-use developments near transit; Retaining on-site mature trees and vegetation, and planting new canopy trees; Measures that increase vehicle efficiency, encourage use of zero and low emissions vehicles, or reduce the carbon content of fuels, including constructing or encouraging construction of electric vehicle charging stations or neighborhood electric vehicle networks, or charging for electric bicycles; and
Measures to reduce GHG emissions from solid waste management through encouraging solid waste recycling and reuse.

II.

Hi.
iv.

V.
k) Consult the SCAG Environmental Justice Toolbox for potential measures to address impacts to low-income and/or minority communities. The measures provided above are also intended to be applied in low income and minority communities as applicable and feasible.

I) Require at least five percent of all vehicle parking spaces include electric vehicle charging stations, or at a minimum, require the appropriate infrastructure to facilitate sufficient electric charging for passenger vehicles and trucks to plug-in.
m) Encourage telecommuting and alternative work schedules, such as:
i. Staggered starting times
ii. Flexible schedules
iii. Compressed work weeks
n) Implement commute trip reduction marketing, such as:
i. New employee orientation of trip reduction and alternative mode options ii. Event promotions
iii. Publications
o) Implement preferential parking permit program
p) Implement school pool and bus programs
q) Price workplace parking, such as:
26 i. Explicitly charging for parking for its employees; ii. Implementing above market rate pricing;
iii. Validating parking only for invited guests;
iv. Not providing employee parking and transportation allowances; and V. Educating employees about available alternatives.

These measures offer a cost-effective, feasible way to incorporate lower-emitting design features into the proposed Project, which subsequently, reduce emissions released during Project construction and operation. An updated EIR should be prepared to include all feasible mitigation measures, as well as include updated air quality, health risk, and GHG analyses to ensure that the necessary mitigation measures are implemented to reduce emissions to below thresholds. The updated EIR should also demonstrate a commitment to the implementation of these measures prior to Project approval, to ensure that the Project's significant emissions are reduced to the maximum extent possible.

Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this Project. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties.

Sincerely,
i/ti —
Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Attachment A: CalEEMod Output Files
Attachment B: Health Risk Calculations
Attachment C: AERSCREEN Output Files
Attachment D: Matt Hagemann CV
Attachment E: Paul E. Rosenfeld CV
27 Attachment A
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMocl.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 51
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations
South Coast Air Basin, Annual
Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric 1 Lot Acreage 1 Roor Surface Area |Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 178.00 Space 11 1.60 71,200.00 1 0 Health Club 36.78 lOOOsqft 1
1 0.84 36,783.00 1
1 0
Hotel 115.00 Room 1
1 3.83 134,097.00 1
1 0
Quality Restaurant 25.09 lOOOsqft 1
1 0.58 25,094.00 1 0
Strip Mall ' 24.98 10OOsqft 1
•

0.57 24,976.00 ; 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
11 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31
Operational Year 2026
Utility Company Southern California Edison
C02 Intensity 364
(Ib/MWhr)
CH4 Intensity
(Ib/MWhr)

0.029 N20 Intensity
(Ib/MWhr)

0.006

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Land Use - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Construction Phase - Construction phases consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to IndividualConstruction Phase Lengths." Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual ^ Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Off-road EquipiTient - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Trips and VMT - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Reductions of Hauling Trip Numbers." Demolition - See SWAPE comment on "Failure to Model Required Amount of Demolition." Grading - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Vehicle Trips - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Energy Use - See SWAPE comment on "Overestimated Reduction to Energy Use Value." Construction Off-rbad Equiprtient Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model. ' Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Energy Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Water Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Waste Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Table Name 1 Column Name 1 Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00

20.00 _____ 20.00
___„ _____ _____ ___„

22.00 tbIConstructionPhase NumDays 32.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 109.00tbIConstructionPhase NumDays 23.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 82.00 tbIConstructionPhase NumDays 49.00
tbIConstructionPhase NumDays 544.00tbIConstructionPhase NumDays _ 132.00 tbIConstructionPhase NumDays 66.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 OQO I 1 . jd d
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 .L L. 1

41.00 "tblGrading MaterialExported 34,564.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 90,356.00
tbILandUse LandUseSquareFeet 36,780.00
"i66r98o7o~o"
Sisaoo
36,783.00
tbILandUse LandUseSquareFeet 134,097.00tbILandUse LandUseSquareFeet 25,094.00tbILandUse LandUseSquareFeet 24,976.00 tbIOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 203.00
tbIOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.40
^___
^___
aoo ___ ___ ^___ ___ ^3.00 ;

0.36 tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoad EquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 tbIOffRoadEquipment OffR oad EquipmentUnitAmount 2.00
tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00
tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM j-r V Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operatiotis - South Coast Air Basin, Annual tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 ; 0.00 tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
1 11 1III ■ 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 1o O1 oto 1O1 1 1 1 jcv] tI1-^-' 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 L L1 1

0.00 tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1 1.00 tbIOff Road Equipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00 tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
1 11 11 11 11 1 1 11 11 11 11 1 io OlOoO Ol1 11 1i1 1 1 11 11 11 i 1}t^ {cm" jcd Je del cvimtI I-: " 1 11 11 11 11 1 1 11 11 1

0.00 tbiOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 tbIOffRoadEquipment
f
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00
tbIOffRoadEq uipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00
tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00
tbiOffRoadEquipment OffR oad EquipmentUnitAmount 2.00
tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 tbiOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00tbIOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00 tbiOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00tbiOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00tbiOffRoddEquipment ■ UsageHours 8.00 tbiOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tbIOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tbiProjectCfiaracteristics C02lntensityFactor 702.44 364 tbITripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 40.00tbITripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 40.00tbITripsAndVMT VendorTripLengtfi 6.90 40.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual tbITripsAndVMT ■■ VendorTripLength 6.S0 40.00tbITripsAndVMT ■■ ■
VendorT ripNumber 0.00 r1
1 60.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
VendorTripNumber 0.00 1
1 120.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
•
VendorT ripNumber 48.00 1
1 100.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
VendorTripNumber 0.00 1
1 60.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■
■
VendorTripNumber o.bo 1
1 120.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
VendorTripNumber 48.00 1
1 100.00
tbITripsAndVMT •■ VendorT ripNumber 48,00 11 50.00
tblTrlpsAndVMt •
■
VendorTripNuttiber 0.00 1
1 20.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
VendorTripNumber 0.00 1
1 20.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
VendorVehicleClass HDT_Mix 1
1 HHDT
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
VendorVehicleCiass HDT_Mix 11 HHDT
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
«
VendorVehicieClass HDT.Mix 1
1 HHDT
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
VendorVe hicieC iass HDT_Mix 1
1 HHDT
tbITripsAndVMT m■
■
VendorVehicieCiass HDT_Mix 11 HHDT
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
VendorVehicleCiass HDT_Mix 1
1 HHDT
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
WorkerTripNumber 18.00 1
1 50.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
WorkerT ripNumber 25.00 1
1 136.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■
m
■
WorkerT ripNumber 120.00 1
1 200.00
tbiTripsAndVMT ■■
■
WorkerTripNumber 18.00 1
1 50.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
WorkerTripNumber 25.00 1
1 136.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
WorkerTripNumber 120.00 1
1 200.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
WorkerTripNumber 120.00 1
1 650.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
WorkerTripNumber 24.00 1
1 300.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
WorkerT ripNumber 10.00 1
1 50.00
tbIVehicleTrips ■■
■
ST_TR 20.87 1
1 6.34
IblVehicIeTrips . m ST_TR . ; 8.19 1 8.38
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual tbIVehicleTrips ;; ST_TR ; 94.36 ; 87.96tblVehicleTrips ; ST_TR ; 42.04 1 35.81tbIVehicleTrips ; •
SU_TR y 26.^ 1 8.12
tbIVehicleTrips j SU_TR T 5.95 } 6.09tbIVehicleTrips ; SU_TR y 72.16 1 67.26tbIVehicleTrips ; SU_TR y 20.43 1 17.40tbIVehicleTrips ; ■
WD_TR y 32.M j 10.00
tbIVehicleTrips ; WD_TR 8.36tbIVehicleTrips ;
■
WD_TR ; 89.95 T 83.84
tbIVehicleTrips ; WD_TR ; 44.32 ; 37.76

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
' • R0fit:;;l^r I^Ox' v
" 1 ■
• CO Sp2 Fugitive..

PM10-
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
.^haust
■ PlyA2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBI(PC02 Total C02 CH4' N20 C02e
Year tdns/yr Ml■/yr
20222023

0.09510.4996

1.6744

6.1337

0.8736

5.2157

5.1900e003

0.0247

0.1629

1.0701

0.02650.1260

0.1894

1.1961

0.03880.2750

0.02490.1196

0.06370.3947

0.00000.0000
499.1273
2,338.067
7 499.1273
2,338.067
7 0.05110.2386

0.0000O.COOO
500.4058
2,344.032
6 2024 0.5462 2.7095 5.0943 0.0142 0.9755 0.0965 1.0720 0.2600 0.0925 0.3525 0.0000 1,273.225 6 1,273.225
6 0.0933 0.0000 1,275.557
0 2025 1.6700 3.1100 6.0350 0.0171 1.2196 0.1048 1.3243 0.3251 0.1001 0.4252 0.0000 1,535.762 5 1,535.762
5 0.1115 0.0000 1,538.549
4 Maximum 1.6700 6.1337 6.0350 0.0247 1.2196 0.1260 1.3243 0.3251 0.1198 0.4252 0.0000 2,338.067 7 2,338.067
7 0.2386 0.0000 2,344.032
6 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM

2.1 Overall Construction
Mitigated Construction
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual BOG CO S02 Fugitive
PM10 ,
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
■PM2.5'
PM2.5
Total
Bio-002 NBiO-C02 Total 002 CH4 N29 C02e
Year fons/yr MT/yr
2022 ■ 0.0951 • 1.6744
1■1

0.8736 5.1900e003 0.1629 0.0265 0.1894 0.0388 0.0249 0.0637 0.0000 499.1272 499.1272 0.0511 0.0000 500.4057 2023 1 0.4996 • 6.1337
1 5.2157 0.0247 1.0701 0.1260 1.1961 0.2750 0.1196 0.3947 0.0000 2,338.067 1 2,338.067
1 0.2386 0.0000 2,344.031
9 2024 I 0.5462 • 2.7095
11 1

5.0943 0.0142 0.9755 0.0965 1.0720 0.2600 0.0925 0.3525 0.0000 1,273.225 2 1,273.225
2 0.0933 0.0000 1,275.556
6 2025 1 1.6700 I 3.1100
1 6.0350 0.0171 1.2196 0.1048 1.3243 0.3251 0.1001 0.4252 0.0000 1,535.762 0 1,535.762
0 0.1115 0.0000 1,538.548
9 Maximum 1.6700 6.1337 6.0350 0.0247 1.2196 0.1260 1.3243 0.3251 0.11S8 0.4252 0.0000 2.338.067 1 2,338.087
1 0.2386 0.0000 2,344.031
9 ROG NOx CO 802 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BIO-C02 NBio-C02 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitlgat^ ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 11-1-2022 1-31-2023 2.3319 2.3319
2 2-1-2023 4-30-2023 0.9446 0.94463 5-1-2023 7-31-2023 2.5175 2.5175 4 8-1-2023 10-31-2023 1.9026 1.9026
5 ' 11-1-2023- , 1-31-2024 0.8887 ' 0.8887
6 2-1-2024 4-30-2024 0.8003 0.8003
7 5-1-2024 7-31-2024 0.8100 0.8100
8 1 8-^-2024 • 10-31-2024 0.8141 0.8141
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 9 11-1-2024 1-31-2025 0.8065 0.8065
10 2-1-2025 4-30-2025 0.7468 0.7468
11 5-1-2025 7-31-2025 1.0056 1.0056
12 8-1-2025 9-30-2025 0.9817 0.9817
Highest 2.5175 2.5175

2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Totai
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5^
PM2.5
Totai
Bio- C02 NBio-C02 Totai C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category si 1;. tbns/yr MT/yr
Area ■
■
■
• 0.9069 • 4.0000e-
; ; 005
1 1 . - 4.8400e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 9.4300e- 003 9.4300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 • 0.0100 ■11 Energy j! • .0";6'524,* "fr 0:4761
• ' ' '
■ 1■ 1
; 0 4000 2.8600e003 0.0362 0.0362 0.0362 0.0362 0.0000 1,061.002 8 1,061.002 8 0.0532 0.0185 Ti,067*829 ! 5 1 Mobile ' 0.7521 • 3.6863
■ 1■ 1

7.8766 0.0313 2.8495 0.0234 2.8729 0.7633 0.0217 0.7850 0.0000 2,307.239 8 2,907.239
8 0.1350 0.0000 • 2,910.615
; 2
t
Waste ■ 1
1 1
I 1

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 65.3083 0.0000 65.3083 3.8596 0.0000 ' 161.7985 1 11
Water
■ 1

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.6187 37.3109 41.9296 0.4774 0.0118 ■ 57.3849 1 ■
t
Total 1.7113 4.1624 8.2814 0.0342 2.8495 0.0596 2.9091 0.7633 0.0579 0.8212 69.9270 4,005.562 9 4,075.489
9 4.5252 0.0303 4,197.638
2 CalEEMod Version; CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM

2.2 Overall Operational
Mitigated Operational
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exttaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area • 0.9069 4.0000e005 4.8400e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.00008- 005 2.00008- 005 0.0000 9.43008- 003 9.43008- 003 2.00008- 005 0.0000 0.0100 Energy ■ 0.0524 0.4761 0.4000 2.8600e003 0.0362 0.0362 0.0362 0.0362 0.0000 1,061.002 8 1,061.002 8 0.0532 0.0185 1,067.829 5 Mobile 1 0.7029 3.4152 6.6427 0.0253 2.2358 0.0192 2.2550 0.5989 0.0178 0.6167 " 0.0000* "Tweloii'" 0 "TMOSOg"
0 "6Ti4o""o'oooo" 2,349*66*0*
0 Waste ————— 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 " 0.0000* *'*00000*""oTooot"Toboo""oToobo" *0.000*0** Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.6187 37.3109 41.9296 0.4774 0.0118 57.3849 Total 1.6621 3.8914 7.0475 0.0281 2.2358 0.0554 2.2912 0.5989 0.0540 0.6529 4.6187 3,445.132 1 3,449.750
8 0.6446 0.0303 3,474.884
4 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Percent
Reduction

2.87 6.51 14.90 17.73 21.54 7.00 21.24 21.54 6.68 20.49 93.39 13.99 15.35 85.76 0.00 17.22

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date NumDays
Week :

Num Days Phase Description
1 Phase 1 - Demolition jDemoiition j 11/1/2022 111/30/2022 • j 1 5
5 J
22 L..................
2 Phase 1 - Grading ^Grading 112/1/2022 11 /15/2023
! 1 J J
32 3 Phase 1 • Building Construction ; Building Construction >1/16/2023 j 6/15/2023 j 5 • 1 J J J
109
4 Phase 2 - Demolition jDemolition >5/1/2023 j5/31/2023 23 j__ j 1 5J L.......... - 5 Phase 2 - Excavation ^Grading j 6/1/2023 { 9/23/2023 1 1 1
5{ 82
5^ 495^ 544 --j ~g~2
L
L...........
6 Phase 2 • Garage Construction iBuilding Construction > 9/24/2023 {11 /30/2023 ........................ ■ j 1
7 PhasG 2 - Hotel Construction ; Building Construction > 12/1/2023 j 12/31/2025 • j 1
8 Architectural Coating ; Architectural Coating >7/1/2025 {12/31/2025 • J9 Paving ; Paving ; 10/1/2025 ; 12/31/2025 ; 5; 66
Acres of Grading (SIfe Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0Acres of Paving: 1.6 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 331,425; Non-Residential Outdoor: 110,475; Striped Parking Area: 4,272 (Architectural Coating - sqft)
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type | Amount Usage Hours 1 Horse Power 1 Load Factor Phase 1 - Demolition
1 ... .
•
Concrete/lndustriai Saws j 1 8.00; 81; 0.73
Phase 1 • Demolition "Excavators
■
2 8.00; 158;
1 0.38
Phase 1 - Demolition ; Paving Equipment 2 8.00; 132; 0.36Phase 1 - Demoiition jRubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 > 1 247;
1 0.40
Phase 1 - Demolition jRubber Tired Dozers
■
1 8.00 >
1 203;
1 0.36
Phase 1 - Demolition "Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 > 97; 0.37 1 Phase 1 - Grading ;Bore/Drili Rigs ; 2 8.00; 221; 0.50 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Phase 1 Grading "Cranes ■ ■ • 2 8.00't 231-1 0.29Phase 1 Grading ■Excavators • ■ 1
2 8.00; 158; 0.38
Phase 1 Grading jGraders • 0 8.00 ■1 187; 0.41Phase 1 Grading *
; Pumps 1 2 8.00; 84; 0.74
Phase 1 Grading ■Rubber Tired Dozers ■
■ 1
0 8.001
1 247; 0.40
Phase 1 Grading 1Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes > 2 8.00*1 97; 1 0.37
Phase 1 Building Construction ^Aerial Lifts ■ 2 aooit 63; 0.31Phase 1 Building Construction ; Cranes [ 1 8.00; 231; 1 0.29
Phase 1 Building Construction ■Forklifts "
■ 1
0 8.00; 89; 0.20
Phase 1 Building Construction ^Generator Sets • 0 8.00; 84; 1 0.74
Phase 1 Building Construction ; Pumps « 2 8.0011 84; 0.74 Phase 1 Building Construction ;Rough Terrain Forklifts " 1 8.0011 100; 0.40Phase 1 Building Construction •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ■ • 1
2 8.00; 97;
1 0.37
Phase 1 Building Construction ■Welders i
■ 1
1 8.00; 46;
1 0.45
Phase 2 Demolition ■Concrete/Industrial Saws ■
■ 1
1 o'.ooJ
1 81;
1 0.73
Phase 2 Demolition ■Excavators «
• 1
2 8.00 •
1 158;
1 0.38
Phase 2 Demolition
' i"; Paving Equipment • 2 8.00 •1 132;
1 0.36
Phase 2 Demolition ; Rubber Tired Dozers ' 0 8.00"
1 247;
1 0.40
Phase 2 Demolition ' ■Rubber Tired Loaders •
■ 1
1 8.00; 203; 0.36
Phase 2 Demolition ■ T ractors/Loaders/Backhoes <
■ 1
1 8.00"
1 97; 0.37
Phase 2 Excavation , „ > jBore/Drill Rigs « 2 8.00; 221; 0.50Phase 2 Excavation ■Cranes « • 1
2 8.00"
1 231; 0.29
Phase 2 Excavation ■Excavators •
■ 1
2 8.00; 158;
1 0.38
Phase 2 Excavation •Graders >
■ 1
0 8.00; 187; 0.41
Phase 2 Excavation ; Pumps • 2 8.00; 84;
1 0.74
Phase 2 Excavation ■Rubber Tired Dozers «
■ I
0 8.60!
1 247; 0.40
Phase 2 Excavation ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 2. 8.00; 97-t •

0.37 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Trips and VMT
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Phase 2 - Garage Construction ; Aerial Lifts ; 2 8.00' 63- ■ ■

0.31 Phase 2 • Garage Construction ■Cranes • 1 8.001 231; 0.29 Phase 2 - Garage Construction ■Forklifts • ■ 1 0 8.00; 89; 0.20Phase 2 - Garage Construction ■Generator Sets * ■ 1 ■ t
0 8.00; 84; 0.74
Phase 2 - Garage Construction ; Pumps • 2 8.00; 84; 0.74 Phase 2 - Garage Construction jRougii Terrain Forkiifts •" 1 8.00; 100; 0.40 Phase 2 - Garage Construction ■Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes •" ■ 1 ■ •
2 8.00; 97; 0.37
Phase 2 - Garage Construction ■Weiders • ■ 1
■ ■
1 8.00; 46; 0.45
Phase 2 - Hotel Coristruction^ ; Aerial Lifts •
j i
2 8.00; 63; 0.31
Phase 2 - Hotel Construction jAir Compressors '
■ •
1 8.00; 78; 0.48
Phase 2 - Hotel Construction ^Concrete/Industrial Saws • • •
1 8.00; 81;
1 1

0.73 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction jCranes • 1 8.00; 231; 0.29Phase 2 - Hotel Construction ; Forklifts • ■ 1
2 8.00; 89; 0.20
Phase 2 - Hotel Construction ^Generator Sets ■ 1 8.00; 84; 0.74 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction ■T ractors/Loaders/Backhoes > 1 8.00; 97; 0.37 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction •Welders • 1 8.00; 46; 0.45 Architectural Coating ■Aerial Lifts • ■ 1
• •
1 8.00; 63; 0.31
Architectural Coating ;Air Compressors •
■ 1
2 6.00; 78; 0.48
Paving ■Cement and l^ortar Mixers ■ ■ 1
■ 1
1 8.00; 9; 0.56
Paving ■Pavers « « 1 0 8.00; 130; 0.42Paving ;Paving Equipment • 1 8.00; 132; 0.36 Paving ; Rollers » 1 8.00; 80; 0.38Paving ^Trenchers ; 1 8.00; 78; 0.50 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Phase Name Off road Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip,
Lerigth ;
• Vendor rrrip
Length '
Hauling Trip
Length
VVorker.Vehicie
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
' Hauling
Vehicle Class
Phase 1 - Demolition 7i
1 50.00 60.00 { 124.00 14.70j 40.00 20.00jLD_iyiix
!

HHDT HHDT
Phase 1 - Grading To^
1 136.00 120.001 4,321.00
J

14.70 40.00} 20.00
J
LD_Mix HHDT HHDT
Phase 1 - Buiiding gj" 200.00 100.00 0.00 14.701 6.go 1 1 J

20.00 LD_Mix HHDT HHDT
Phase 2 - Demolition fi"
1 50.00 60.00} 135.00
J

14.70 40.00
J

20.00 LD_Mix HHDT }HHDT
_l
Phase 2 - Excavation Toi"
1 136.00 120.00 11,205.00 14.701 40.00} 20.00 LD_Mix HHDT HHDT Phase 2 - Garage gi"1 200.00 100.00} 0.00
J

14.70 6.go 20.00 LD_Mix HHDT HHDT
Phase 2 - Hotei Toi"
1 650.00 50.00
J

0.00 14.701 6.go
1 J

20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 300.00 20.00} 0.00- 14.701 6.g0
■ '

20.00 }LD_Mix }HDT_IWix HHDT
Paving 4 50.00 20.00; 0.00 14.70; 6.g0; 20.00 LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix HHDT

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area

3.2 Phase 1 - Demolition - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Totai
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons/yr Ml/yr
Fugitive Dust
OH-Road
1 ' 0.0209
1 1

0.1981 0.2217 3.8000e004

0.0134 0.0000

9.7900e003

0.0134

9.7900e003

2.0300e003 0.0000

9.1400e003

2.0300e003

9.1400e003

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

32.8770

0.0000

32.8770

0.0000

9.0400e003

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

33.1031
Total 0.0209 0.1981 0.2217 3.8000e004 0.0134 9.7900e- 003 0.0232 2.0300e- 003 9.1400e- 003 0.0112 0.0000 32.8770 32.8770 9.0400e- 003 0.0000 33.1031 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMocl.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 51 Date: 212312022 11:32 AM

3.2 Phase 1 - Demolition - 2022
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust ;
PM10 ■
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhau^ .

PM2.5;'
PM2.5
, Total
BI0-CG2 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category Ml•/yr
Hauling
Vendor

4.5000e004

8.6300e003

0.0153

0.2682

3.61 OOe003

0.0688
S.OOOOe005

9.3000e004

1.0700e003

0.0227

4.0000e005

9.10006-
004
I.IIOOe003

0.0236

2.9000e004

6.2200e003

4.0000e005

8.7000e004

3.3000e004

7.0900e003

0.0000
' ; O.OOOO" '

4.5972

91.6110

4.5972

91.6110

3.3000e004

6.0200e003

0.00000.0000

4.6055
Vl7616 "
Worker 2.1500e003 l.5300e- 003 0.0177 6.0000e- 005 6.0300e- 003 4.0000e- 005 6.0800e- 003 l.eoooe- 003 4.0000e- 005 1.6400e- 003 ; 0.0000 5.0731 5.0731 1.30006- 004 0.0000 5.0763 Total 0.0112 0.2851 0.0901 1.0400e003 0.0298 9.9000e- 004 0.0308 O.IIOOe- 003 g.SOOOe- 004 9.06008- 003 0.0000 101.2813 101.2813 6.48008- 003 0.0000 101.4434 Mitigated Constructic5n On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons/yr Ml/yr
Fugitive Dust
••
•1

0.0134 0.0000 0.0134 2.0300e003 0.0000 2.0300e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 "Toooo"'

0.0000
Olf-Road ■1 0.0209 0.1981 0.2217 3.8000e- VoVoii"
004

9.7900e003 9.7900e- 003 9.l400e- 003 9.14008- 003 0.0000 32.8770 32.8770 9.04006- 003 Total 0.0209 0.1981
T ' •,

0.2217 3.8C00e004 0.0134 9.79008- 003 0.0232 2.0300e- 003 9.14000- 003 0.0112 0.0000 32.8770 32.8770 9.0400e- 003 0.0000 33.1031 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 51 Date: 2/23/202211:32 AM

3.2 Phase 1 - Demolition - 2022
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Totai
Bio- 002 NBio- 002 Total 002 0H4 N20 0020
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling j• 4.5000e-
: 004

0.0153 3.61 OOe003 S.OOOOe- 005 1.07C0e- 003 4.0000e- 005 l.nooe- 003 2.8000e- 004 4.00000- 005 3.30000- 004 0.0000 4.5972 4.5972 3.3000e- 004 O.OCOO 4.6055 Vendor
■■■
■ 8.6300e1 003 0.2682 0.0688 9.3000e- 004 0.0227 9.1000e- 004 0.0236 6.2200e- 003 8.70000- 004 7.09000- 003 0.0000 91.6110 91.6110 6.02000- 003 0.0000 91.7616 Worker
■
a
■ 2.1500e-
; 003

1.5300e003 0.0177 O.OOOOe- 005 6.0300e- 003 4.0000e- 005 6.0800e- 003 i.eoooe- 003 4.0000e- 005 1.64000- 003 0.0000 5.0731 5.0731 1.30000- 004 0.0000 5.0763 Total 0.0112 0.2851 0.0801 1.0400e003 0.0298 9.90000- 004 0.0308 8.11000- 003 9.50000- 004 9.06000- 003 0.0000 101.2813 101.2813 6.48000- 003 0.0000 101.4434

3.3 Phase 1
Unmitiaatedl
- Gradi
Cohstru
ng - 202
eftion Or
!2
-Site - - ■
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- 002 NBio-002 Total 002 0H4 N20 002e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust j
aa

0.0237 0.0000 0.0237 2.64000-
003

0.0000 2.64000-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Olf-Road j 0.0290 0.2832 0.2895 6.6000e004 0.0127 0.0127 0.0120 0.0120 0.0000 57.8121 57.8121 0.0153 0.0000 58.1949 Total 0.0290 0.2832 0.2895 6.6000e004 0.0237 0.0127 0.0364 2.64000- 003 0.0120 0.0146 0.0000 57.8121 57.8121 0.0153 0.0000 58.1949 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.3 Phase 1 - Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
.. . ,:j| ,
• *
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tonsyyr MT/yr
Hauling 1 0.0109 0.3673 0.0865 1.1200e003 0.0343 1.0400e- 003 0.0353 9.1500e- 003 I.OOOOe- 003 0.0102 0.0000 110.1360 110.1360 7.91 OOe- 003 0.0000 110.3338 Vendor 1 0.0173 0.5365 0.1376 1.8600e003 0.0453 1.8100e- 003 0.0472 0.0124 1.7300e- 003 0.0142 0.0000 183.2219 183.2219 0.0121 0.0000 183.5231Worker ■ 5.8400e- ; 003

4.1700e003 0.0482 1.5000e- 004 0.0164 l.2000e- 004 0.0165 4.3600e- 003 I.IOOOe- 004 4.4700e- 003 0.0000 13.7989 13.7989 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 "isVofe' Total 0.0340 0.9080 0.2723 3.13000-
003

0.0980 2.9700e003 0.0990 0.0260 2.8400e- 003 0.0288 0.0000 307.1569 307.1569 0.0203 0.0000 307.6645 Mitiqated Constructi(an On-Sito
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2:5
PM2.5
Total
BIO-C02 NBiO-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons^r MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0237 0.0000 0.0237 2.6400e003 0.0000 2.6400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-RoVd' 1 0.0290 0.2832 0.2895 6.6000e004 0.0127 0.0127 0.0120 0.0120 "o.oooo"" 57.8121 57.8121 0.0153 O.OOOO Vb j 948 " Total 0.0290 0.2895 6.6000e004 0.0237 0.0127 0.0364 2.6400e- 003 0.0120 0.0146 0.0000 57.8121 57.8121 0.0153 0.0000 58.1948 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM

3.3 Phase 1 - Grading - 2022
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PfifllO
Pf^lO
Total
Fugitive:

PM2.5
Extiaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
TotahBlo- 002 NBIo- C02 Total 002 0H4 N20 0026
Category tons/yr Mlr/yr
Hauling ■
■■
> 0.0109 0.3673 0.0865 1.12C0e003 0.0343 1.04006- 003 0.0353 9.15006- 003 1 .OOCOe- 003 0.0102 0.0000 110.1360 110.1360 7.91006- 003 0.0000 110.3338 Vendor
■■
I 0.0173 0.5365 0.1376 1.8600e003 0.0453 1.81006- 003 0.0472 0.0124 l.-'SOOe- 003 0.0142 0.0000 183.2219 183.2219 0.0121 0.0000 183.5231 Worker
■
■■
■ 5.8400e-
; 003

4.1700e003 0.0482 1.5000e- 004 0.0164 1.20006- 004 0.0165 4.3600e- 003 I.IOOOe- 004 4.47006- 003 0.0000 13.7989 13.7989 3.50006- 004 0.0000 13.8076 Total 0.0340
; ' '!
.0.9080 0.2723 3.1300e003 0.0960 2.9700e- 003 0.O9S0 0.0260 2.84006- 003 0.0288 0.0000 307.1569 307.1569 0.0203 0.0000 307.6645

3.3 Phase 1
Unmitiaated
- Gradi
Constru
ng - 202
otion Or
►3
-Site
(
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PIVI10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Blo- 002 NBio- 002 Total 002 0H4 N20 0026
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0237 0.0000 0.0237 2.6400e003 0.0000 2.6400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0123 0.1169 0.1308 3.0000e004 5.1200e- 003 5.12006- 003 4.82006- 003 4.82006- < 003 ; 0.0000 26.2987 26.2987 6.94006- 003 0.0000 26.4721 Total 0.0123 0.1169 0.1308 3.0000e004 0.0237 5.1200e- 003 0.0288 2.64009- 003 4.8200e- 003 7.4600e- 003 0.0000 26.2987 26.2987 6.94006- 003 0.0000 26.4721 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMbd.aol 6.3.2 Page 18 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:^2 AM jl ■ ■ i 3.3 Phase i - Grading - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Totai
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Totai
Bio- C02 NBiO- C02 Totai C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tenser Ml•/yr
Hauling ■ 3.2400e-
; 003

0.1070 0.0356 4.9000e004 0.0308 2.0000e- 004 0.0310 7.9000e- 003 1.9000e- 004 8.0900e- 003 0.0000 1 48.0111 48.0111 3.3300e- 003 0.0000 48.0944 Vendor ■ 5.1200e-
; 003

0.1455 0.0571 B.IOOOe004 0.0206 3.3000e- 004 0.0209 5.6600e- 003 3.2000e- 004 5.9800e- 003 0.0000 79.9090 79.9090 5.2000e- 003 0.0000 80.0390 Worker • 2.5000e-
: 003

1.7100e003 0.0202 7.0000e- 005 7.4600e- 003 S.OOOOe- 005 7.51 OOe- 003 1.9800e- 003 5.0000e- 005 2.0300e- 003 0.0000 6.0385 6.0385 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 6.0421 Total 0.0109 0.2541 0.1129 1.3700e003 0.0589 5.80000- 004 0.0595 0.0155 5.6000e- 004 0.0161 0.0000 133.9586 133.9586 8.670De- 003 0.0000 134.1755 Mitiaated Constructi(3n On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Er^haust
.5M2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBiO- C02 Total C02 CH4 N2p C02e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
!
1 - ' r1

0.0237 0.0000 0.0237 2.6400e003 o.qqoo 2.6400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1 0.0123 0.1169 0.1308 3.0000e004 5.1200e- 003 5.1200e- 003 4.8200e- 003 4.8200e- 003 0.0000 26.2987 26.2987 6.9400e- 003 0.0000 26.4721 Total 0.0123 0.1169 0.1308 3.0000e004 0.0237 5.1200e- 003 0.0288 2.6400e- 003 4.8200e- 003 7.4600e- 003 0.0000 26.2987 26.2987 6.9400e- 003 0.0000 26.4721 CalEEMod Version: CaiEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM

3.3 Phase 1 - Grading - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual ROG IMOx CO S02 Fugitive
P1VI10
Exhaust
PIVI10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-002 NBio- 002 Total 002 CH4 N20 0O2e
Category
, , .
tons/yr Ml•/yr
.
• ; .i
Hauling
■■
' 3.2400e- • 0.1070
; 003 ;

0.0356 4.9000e004 0.0308 2.0000e- 004 0.0310 7.90COe- 003 1.9000e- 004 8.0900e- 003 0.0000 48.0111 48.0111 3.3300e- 003 0.0000 48.0944 Vendor
'G
J
■
• 5.1200e- ;. 0.1455.
1 003 :
1 1 ~

0.0571 8.1000e004 0.0206 3.3000e- 004 0.0209 5.6600e- 003 3.2000e- 004 5.9800e- 003 0.0000 79.9090 79.9090 5.2000e- 003 0.0000 80.0390 Worker
■■■
• 2.5000e-
; 003
I.ZIOOe003 0.0202 7.0000e- 005 7.4600e- 003 S.OOOOe- 005 7.51 OOe- 003 1.98000- 003 S.OOOOe- 005 2.0300e- 003 0.0000 6.0385 6.0385 1.40000- 004 0.0000 6.0421 Total 0.0109 0.2541 0.1129 1.3700e003 0.0589 5.80000- 004 0.0595 0.0155 5.6000e- 004 0.0161 0.0000 133.9586 133.9586 8.6700e- 003 0.0000 134.1755

3.4 Phase 1
Unmitigated
- Bulidi
Constru
ng Con
otion On
structlc
-Site
m - 2023
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PIW10
Total
Fugitive
pn/12.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-002 NBio-002 Total 002 0H4 N20 002e
Category tons/yr ftrn¥
Off-Road
■■
m
> 0.0948
1 II

0.8872 1.0844 1.8800e003 0.0381 0.0381 •11
1 0.0365 0.0365 0.0000 i 161.8995 ' 161.8995 > 0.0331
I I II 1
• 1

0.0000 ' 162.7259
i1
Total 0.0948 0.8872 1.0844 1.88000-
003

0.0381 0.0381 0.0365 0.0365 0.0000 161.8995 161.8995 0.0331 0.0000 162.7259 (»
CalEEModWersion: 'CalEEMbd.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.4 Phase 1 - Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2,5
Total
BI6-C02 NBIokCOB Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category , tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
; 0.0000
; 0.0128

0.00000.5635

0.00000.1365

0.0000

1.6800e003

0.0000

0.0324

0.0000

6.3000e004

0.0000

0.0330

0.0000

8.9000e003

0.0000
e.ooooe004

0.0000

9.5000e003

0.0000
J'o.oooo""

0.0000
165.9794

0.0000
165.9794

0.0000

0.0136

0.0000
O.OOCO

0.0000
i66".3193'
Worker 1 0.0401 0.0275 0.3239 1.0700e003 0.1196 8.5000e- 004 0.1204 0.0318 7.9000e- 004 0.0326 ; 0.0000 !

96.7939 96.7939 2.2600e003 0.0000 96.8510
Total 0.0529 0.5910 0.4604 2.7500e003 0.1520 1.4800e- 003 0.1535 0.0407 1.3900e- 003 0.0421 0.0000 262.7733 262.7733 0.0159 0.0000 263.1703 Mitigated Constructi(>n On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
Pl\410
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N29 C02e
Category tbns/yr l\4T/yr
Off-Road
I
< 0.0948
1 0.8872 1.0844 1.8800e003 0.0381 ■ 0.0381 ' 1 1 1 1
1 1

0.0365 0.0365 0.0000 161.8993 • 161.8993 • 0.0331 • 0.0000 ' 162.7257 I 1 1 1I 1 1 1
• I I I
Total 0.0948 0.8872 1.0844 1.8800e003 0.0381 0.0381 0.0365 0.0365 0.0000 161.8993 161.8993 0.0331 0.0000 162.7257 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.4 Phase 1 - Building Construction - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- 002 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category
^ ■ 1
, ; ■ ton
,
s/yr Ml•/yr
Hauling
VendorWorker
'0.0000 • 0.0000
• 1• 1• 1
r 0.0128 T 0.5635
1 11 11 1

0.0000
""oTaes""

0.0000
"".esobe"^
003

0.0000
"~a6324~

0.0000 ————— 6.3000e004 0.0000 '"aoMo'" 0.0000 "8.906b~' 003 0.0000 "e.bobb^'' 004 0.0000 'Tsboo^"' 003 0.0000 "b.bbbo" "o.bood"

0.0000
TesTgriT'

0.0000
""65I794

0.0000
""aolie"'

0.0000
'Tobob'"'

0.0000
166.3193'
; 0.0401 0.0275 0.3239 1.07008- "3'6!8"5i6 "
003

0.1196 8.5000e004 0.1204 0.0318 7.9000e- 004 0.0326 96.7939 96.7939 2.2800e- 003 0.0000 Total 0.0529 0.5910 0.4604 2.7500e003 0.1520 1.4800e- 003 0.1535 0.0407 1.3900e- 003 0.0421 0.0000 262.7733 262.7733 0.0159 0.0000 263.1703

3.5 Phase 2
Unmitiaated
- Demo
Constru
lition - ctlon On2023 -Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0146 0.0000 0.0146 2.2000e003 0.0000 2.2000e- 003 o.cooo 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Olf-Road 1 0.0170 0.1504 0.2188 3.9000e004 6.91 OOe- 003 6.91 OOe- 003 6.4700e- 003 6.4700e- 003 0.0000 34.3124 34.3124 9.4000e- 003 0.0000 34.5474 Total 0.0170 0.1504 0.2188 3.9000e004 0.0146 6.91 OOe- 003 0.0215 2.2000e- 003 6.4700e- 003 8.6700e- 003 0.0000 34.3124 34.3124 9.4000e- 003 0.0000 34.5474 CalEEMod Version: CaiEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 51
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM

3.5 Phase 2 - Denfiolition - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
pMio
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BIO-C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons/yr Ml■/yr
Hauling
Vendor
• 3.2000e-; 004
• 5.8800e-! 003

0.0107

0.1673

3.5600e003

0.0656

5.0000e0059.3000e004
l.1600e003

0.0237

2.0000e005

3.9000e004

1.1800e003

0.0241

3.2000e004

6.5000e003

2.0000e005

3.7000e004

3.4000e004

6.8700e003

0.00000.0000

4.8000

91.8953

4.8000

91.8953

3.3000e004

5.98008-
003

0.00000.0000

4.8083

92.0448
Worker ■ 2.1100e-
! 003

1.4500e003 0.0171 6.0000e- 005 6.31 OOe- 003 5.0000e- 005 6.3500e- 003 1.6800e- 003 4.0000e- 005 1.7200e- 003 0.0000 5.1061 5.1061 1.20008- 004 0.0000 5.1091 Total 8.31 OOe003 0.1794 0.0863 1.0400e- 003 0.0312 4.6000e- 004 0.0316 8.5000e- 003 4.3000e- 004 8.9300e- 003 0.0000 101.8014 101.8014 6.43008- 003 0.0000 101.9622 Mitigated Co
1 nstructic5n On-Site
i
(
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
ExhaustPM2;5 PM2:5-: Total BIO-C02 NBIO: C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e Category tons/yr Ml/yr
Fugitive Dust
b'ff-RoVd' ; 0.0170 0.1504 0.2188 3.9000e004

0.0146 0.0000

6.91 OOe003

0.0146

6.91 OOe003

2.2000e003 0.0000

6.4700e003

2.2000e0036.4700e003

0.0000
" 0.0000 "

0.0000
~34.3i23~

0.0000
~34.3"^"'

0.0000
9!4000e~'
003

0.0000
""ooooo""

0.0000
34!5474 "
Total 0.0170 0.1504 0.2188 3.9000e004 0.0146 6.91 OOe- 003 0.0215 2.2000e- 003 6.4700e- 003 8.67008- 003 o.cooo 34.3123 34.3123 g.4000e- 003 0.0000 34.5474 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMocl.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.5 Phase ^ - PjemqlitiQh r 2023
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
... i
ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive'
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bip-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C028
Category tons/yr Ml•/yr
Hauling « 3.2000e-
; 004

0.0107 3.56008-
003

5.0000e005 I.l600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.18008- 003 3.20008- 004 2.00008- 005 3.40008- 004 0.0000 4.8000 4.8000 3.30008- 004 0.0000 4.8083 Vendor • 5.8800e-
; 003

0.1673 0.0656 9.3000e004 0.0237 3.90008- 004 0.0241 6.50008- 003 3.70008- 004 6.87008- 003 0.0000 91.8953 91.8953 5.9800e- 003 0.0000 92.0448 Worker • 2.1100e-
; 003

1.4500e003 0.0171 e.ooooe- 005 6.31 OOe- 003 5.00008- 005 6.35008- 003 1.68008- 003 4.00008- 005 1.72008- 003 0.0000 5.1061 5.1061 1.20008- 004 0.0000 5.1091 Total 8.31 OOe003 0.1794 0.0863 1.0400e- 003 0.0312 4.6000e- 004 0.0316 8.50008- 003 4.30000- 004 8.93000- 003 0.0000 101.8014 101.8014 6.43000- 003 0.0000 101.9622

3.6 Phase 2 - Excavation - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Qn-Slte
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBiO- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons/yr Ml■/yr
Fugitive Oust 5.11008-
003

0.0000 5.11000-
003

7.70008-
004

0.0000 7.70000-
004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road o.-fOli o.^it 1.0727 2.47008-
003

0.0420 0.0420 0.0395 0.0395 0.0000 215.6496 215.6496 0.0569 0.0000 217".'0715 Total 0.1012 0.9588 1.0727 2.47000-
003

5.11000-
003

0.0420 0.0471 7.70000-
004

0.0395 0.0403 0.0000 215.6496 215.6498 0.0569 0.0000 217.0715 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM

3.6 Phase 2 - Excavation - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PIWI10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons/yr Ml•/yr
Hauling
VendorWorker
1 0.0271 0.8947 0.2981 4.0600e003 0.1701 1.6400e- 003 0.1718 0.0446 1.5700e- 003 0.0462 0.0000 " o.oooo""

0.0000
401.6000 401.6000 0.0279 0.0000 402.2970
656.319V
V9?l^»5i"
1 0.0420
» !-t—:
1 0.0205

1.1928

0.0141

0.4680

0.1657

6.6200e003

5.5000e004

0.2963

0.1142

2.7500e003

4.4000e004

0.2991

0.1147

0.0776

0.0293

2.6300e003

4.0000e004

0.0803

0.0297
655.2537

49.5159
655.2537

49.5159

0.0426

1.1700e003

0.0000

0.0000
Total 0.0895 2.1015 0.9317 0.0112 0.5807 4.8300e003 0.5855 0.1515 4.6000e- 003 0.1561 0.0000 1,108.369 6 1,106.369 6 0.0717 0.0000 1,108.161 5 Mitiaated Constructlcm On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PfVIlO
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BIO-C02 NBI0-CO2 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons>yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 5.ii00e003 0.0000 5.1100e- 003 7.7000e- 004 0.0000 7.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1 0.1012 0.9588 1.0727 2.4700e003 0.0420 0.0420 0.0395 0.0395 0.0000 215.6494 215.6494 0.0569 0.0000 217.0713 Total 0.1012 0.9588 1.0727 2.47C0e003 S.IIOOe- 003 0.0420 0.0471 7.7000e- 004 0.0395 0.0403 0.0000 215.6494 215.6494 0.0569 0.0000 217.0713 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of $1 Date: 2/23/2022 1.1:32 AM .

3.6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Extiaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PH42.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBi0-CO2 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons/yr Ml■/yr
Hauling
Vendor
; 0.02711 0.0420

0.8947

1.1928

0.29810.4680

4.0600e003

6.6200e003

0.17010.2963

1.6400e003

2.7500e003

0.17180.2991

0.04460.0776

1.5700e003

2.6300e003

0.04620.0803

0.00000.0000
401.6000
655.2537
401.6000655.2537

0.02790.0426

0.0000

0.0000
402.2970656.3194
Worker 1 0.0205 0.0141 0.1657 5.5000e004 0.1142 4.4000e- 004 0.1147 0.0293 4.0000e- 004 0.0297 ; 0.0000 49.5159 49.5159 1.1700e- 003 0.0000 49.5451 Total 0.0895 2.1015 0.9317 0.0112 0.5807 4.8300e003 0.5855 0.1515 4.6000e- 003 0.1561 o.cooo 1,108.369 6 1,106.369 6 0.0717 0.0000 1,108.161 5

3.7 Phase 2
Unmitigated
- Garac
Constru
ie Consction On
tructior
-Site
- 2023
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BIO-C02 NBIO-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category' ' , 1 . tons/yr MT¥ 'Off-Road ■
■m
• 0.04261
1 i

0.3988 0.4875 B.SOOOe- •
004 1

0.0171 0.0171 ■ • 0.0164 ' 0.0164
I ■ 11 I I
1 1

0.0000 • 72.7805 " 72.7805 ' 0.0149 • 0.0000 ' 73.1520
• 1 I 1 11 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 .

Total b.0426 0.3986' 0.4875 8.5000e004 0.0171 0.0171 0.0164 0.0164 0.0000 72.7805 72,7805 0.0149 0.0000 73.1520' CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.7 Phase 2 - Garage Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.S
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bl0rC02 NB!chC02 Total 002 0H4 N20 002e
Categoiy tonsyyr
■ • 'i ■ •
Ml■/yr
' ^
, . 'T:n ' "
Hauling ■
■
Vendor
■ . . j i. - .V i .;|
Worker
■■■
> 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 "o.oooo""o.booo""

0.0000

74.6746"
~^.5729~

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
""ooobb""Toboti"*"

0.0000
74*7674 '
"^5385 "
• 5.7700e-; 003
i 0.0180
1•

0.2533
Jilb.i.'li-.

0.0124

0.0614
,

0.1456

7.5000e004
"4.io6oe~^
004

0.0255
"~o"ioo4"'

2.80000-
004
"ilioob"'
004

0.0258
"~o"iooi""

6.6800e003
"~0"0257""

2.7000e004 —— r—

3.50000-
004

6.9500e003
"oloiei""

74.6146
~43.5729"'

6.11000-
003
T.bsobe'"'
003
Total 0.0238 0.2657 0.2070 1.23000-
003

0.1259 6.60000-
004

0.1265 0.0324 6.20000-
004

0.0330 0.0000 118.1275 118.1275 7.14000-
003

0.0000 118.3059
Mitigated Constructicin On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PIVI2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-002 NBiO- 002 Total 002 0H4 N20 002e
Category tons/yr Ml/yrOff-Road •
■••

0.0426 0.3988 0.4875 8.5000e004 0.0171 ' 0.0171 0.0164 0.0164 0.0000 i 72.7804 >' 72.7804 • 1 • 11 1

0.0149 0.0000 73.1519
Total 0.0426 0.3988 0.4875 8.50000-
004

0.0171 0.0171 0.0164 0.0164 0.0000 72.7804 72.7804 0.0149 0.0000 73.1519

Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Date: 2/23/2022 ..l l :32^l^,. ^

3.7 Phase 2 - Garage Construction - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBI0-CO2 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons/yr Ml/yr
Hauling 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor • 5.7700e-
; 003

0.2533 0.0614 7.5000e004 0.0255 2.8000e- 004 0.0258 6.6800e- 003 2.7000e- 004 6.9500e- 003 0.0000 74.6146 74.6146 6.1100e- 003 0.0000 74.7674 Worker 1 0.0180 0.0124 0.1456 4.8000e004 0.1004 3.8000e- 004 0.1008 0.0257 3.5000e- 004 0.0261 0.0000 43.5129 43.5129 1.0300e- 003 0.0000 43.5385 Total 0.0238 0.2657 0.2070 1.2300e003 0.1259 G.SOOOe- 004 0.1265 0.0324 6.2000e- 004 0.0330 0.0000 118.1275 118.1275 7.1400e- 003 0.0000 118.3059

3.8 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction - 2023
Unmitioated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PMZ5
Total
Bio- C02 NBIO-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
' Categbiy tons^r 1 , Mlvyr
Off-Road ;
■
; 0.0202 0.1763 0.2096 3.6000e004 8.l700e- 003 8.1700e- 003 • 7.8600e- • 7.8600e- ! 003 ; 003 1 1

0.0000 ' 31.2448 • 31.2448 • 5.5300e- « 0.0000
; ; ; 003 1
■ I I I

31.3831
Total 0.0202 0.1763 0.2096 3.6000e004 8.1700e- 003 8.1700e- 003 7.86009- 003 7.8600e- 003 0.0000 31.2448 31.2448 5.5300e- 003 0.0000 31.3831 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.8 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROQ- NOx- CO S02 Fugitive ■
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
^haust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20' Cd2e
Category
■ V -.. '''I
* f ,
tenser Mlvyr
■ i A".

Hauling
11 • 0.0000
t
1 t

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor l.0500e003 0.0364 0.0110 1.3000e- 004 3.31 OOe- 003 4.0000e- 005 3.3500e- 003 9.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 9.9000e- 004 0.0000 12.2447 12.2447 7.0000e- 004 0.0000 12.2621Worker 1 I
• 0.0251
1 •

0.0172 0.2028 6.7000e004 0.0749 5.3000e- 004 0.0754 0.0199 4.9000e- 004 0.0204 0.0000 60.6072 60.6072 1.4300e- 003 0.0000 60.6430 Total 0.0261 0.0536 0.2138 a.0000e004 0.0782 S.TOOOe- 004 0.0788 0.0208 5.3000e- 004 0.0214 0.0000 72.8519 72.8519 2.1300e- 003 0.0000 72.3051 Mitigated Constructicm On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category ton.s/yr Ml/yr
Olf-Road
■■■
• 0.0202
a
t
1 0.1763 0.2036 3.6000e004 8.l700e- 003 8.1700e- 003 1 7.8600e- 003 7.8600e- 003 ; 0.0000 31.2447 31.2447 5.5300e- 003 0.0000 31.3831 Total 0.0202 0.1763 0.2096 3.6000e004 8.1700e- 003 8.1700e- 003 7.8600e- 003 7.8600e- 003 0.0000 31.2447 31.2447 5.5300e- 003 0.0000 31.3831 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMoci.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.8 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exfiaust
PM10
PM10
, Total
Fugitive,
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 .

Total
BIO-C02 NBId- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons^r MT/yr
Hauling • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor
Worker
« I.OSOOe-
; 003
1 0.0251

0.0364

0.0172

0.0110

0.2028

1.3000e004

6.7000e004

3.31 OOe003

0.0749

4.0000e005

5.3000e004

3.3500e003

0.0754

9.5000e004

0.0199

4.0000e0054.9000e004

9.8000e004

0.0204

0.0000
* o.booo""

12.2447
"6b.6072~'

12.2447
~6b.6072"'

7.0000e004
~.^6oe^'
003

0.0000
""aoobb"'

12.2621
Vo'mso '
Total 0.0261 0.0536 0.2138 S.OOOOe004 0.0782 5.70D0e- 004 0.0788 0.0208 5.3000e- 004 0.0214 0.0000 72.8519 72.8519 2.1300e- 003 0.0000 72.9051

3.8 Phase 2
Unmitigated
.. . i
- Hotel
Constru
.1
Cohstri
ction On
jctlon - -Site 2024
''
..f
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBI0-CO2 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road ■
■■■
; 0.2369 2.0615 2.6024 4.5400e003 0.0894 0.0894 • 0.0859 • 0.0859 1 1 1 1 1 1

0.0000 i 389.8368 389.8368 0.0683 ■ 0.0000 • 391.5449
1 •
I 1
Total 0.2369 2.0815 2.6024 4.54008-
003

0.0894 0.0894 0.0859 0.0859 0.0000 389.8368 389.8368 0.0883 0.0000 391.5449 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.8 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction - 2024
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
' ROG ■ NOx" CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Totai
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaljst
PM2.5
PM2.5
Totai
Bio- C02 NBIO- C02 Total C02 CH4 N2id' C02e "'
Category tons^r Mlvyr
Hauling j 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1 0.0128 0.4524 0.1327 1.5600e003 0.0413 5.2000e- 004 0.0418 0.0119 5.0000e- 004 0.0124 0.0000 152.2190 152.2190 8.5900e- 003 0.0000 152.4338Worker 1 0.2965 0.1956 2.3592 8.0800e003 0.9342 6.5700e- 003 0.9408 0.2481 6.0500e- 003 0.2542 0.0000 731.1699 731.1699 0.0163 0.0000 731.5783 Total 0.3093 0.6480 2.4919 9.6400e003 0.97S5 7.0900e- 003 0.9826 0.2600 6.5500e- 003 0.2666 0.0000 883.3889 883.3889 0.0249 0.0000 884.0121 Mitioated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons/yr •/yr
Off-Road
■■
1 0.2369 2.0615 2.6024 4.5400e003 0.0894 0.0894 0.0859 0.0859 0.0000 389.8363 389.8363 0.0683 0.0000 391.5445 Total 0.2369 2.0615 2.6024 4.5400e003 0.0894 0.0894 0.0859 0.0859 0.0000 389.8363 389.8363 0.0683 0.0000 391.5445 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.8 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction - 2024
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG fslOx CO 302 Fugitive
PfyllO
Exfraust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BIO-C02 NBio- 002 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons/yr Ml■/yr
Hauling
Vendor
■ 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 "o.oooo""

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
1 0.0128 0.4524 0.1327 1.5600e003 0.0413 5.2000e- 004 0.0418 0.0119 5.0000e- 004 0.0124 152.2190 152.2190 8.5800e- 003 0.0000 152.4338 Worker 1 0,2965 0.1956 2.3592 8.0800e003 0.9342 6.5700e- 003 0.9408 0.2481 6,0500e- 003 0.2542 0.0000 731.1699 731.1699 0.0163 0.0000 731.5783 Total 0.3093 0.6480 2.4919 9.6400e003 0.9755 7.0900e- 003 0.9826 0.2600 6.5500e- 003 0.2666 0.0000 883.3889 883.3889 0.0249 0.0000 884.0121 1 3.8 Phase 2
Unmitigated
- Hotel
Constru
r
Constri
ction Or
jction - -Site 2025
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PI^IO
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2,5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.S
Total
Bio-002 NBIO-C02 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
Category toos/yr MT/yrOff-Road j' 0.2213 1
1 1.9203 2.5818 4.5200e003 0.0773 0.0773 0.0742 0.0742 0.0000 • 388.3854 • 388.3854 • 0.0673 • 0.0000 • 390.0684 • I I I ! I 1 I 1 1 1 1 t
Total 0.2213 1.9203 2.5818 4.5200e003 0.0773 0.0773 0.0742 0.0742 0.0000 388.3854 388.3854 0.0873 0.0000 390.0684 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMocl.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022,11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.8 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction - 2025
Unmitiaated<iC6nstrUction Off-Site
ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive';,
PM2:5;-
Exhaust'
PM2.5
PM2;5/-'
Total ,
Bio- C02 NBiO- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons/yr Ml•yyr
Hauling 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor ; 0.0125 0.4467 0.1288 I.SSOOe003 0.0411 S.IOOOe- 004 0.0416 0.0119 4.9000e- 004 0.0124 0.0000 150.8053 150.8053 8.4300e- 003 0.0000 151.0160Worker • 0.2809 0.1782 2.1827 7.7300e003 0.9306 6.4200e- 003 0.9371 0.2472 5.91 OOe- 003 0.2531 0.0000 699.7098 699.7098 0.0148 0.0000 700.0805 Total 0.2934 0.6249 2.3115 9.2800e003 0.9718 6.9300e- 003 0.9787 0.2590 6.4000e- 003 0.2654 0.0000 850.5151 850.5151 0.0233 0.0000 851.0965 iVlitiaated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBiO- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category
1 , tons/yr ij; Ml/yr
Off-Road
■
• 0.2213
•
•
•

1.9203 2.5818 4.5200e003 0.0773 0.0773 0.0742 0.0742 0.0000 388.3849 388.3849 0.0673 0.0000 390.0660 Total
. I' ' ■

0.221 ?(.

Vi' I
Pi1.9203, . 2.5818 4.5200e003 0.0773 0.0773 0.0742 0.0742 0.0000 388.3849 388.3849 0.0673 0.0000 390.p880 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.8 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction - 2025
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exfiaust
PM10
PIVIIO
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Pl^2.5
Totai
Bio- C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons/yr Ml•/yr
Hauling ;;; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000
1 1
•1 1 1

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 (J.OOOO 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor - 0.0125 > 0.4467 • 0.1288
•I 1 1
■t i l■t 1 1

1.5500e003 0.0411 5.1000e- 004 0.0416 0.0119 4.9000e- 004 0.0124 0.0000 150.8053 150.8053 8.4300e- 003 0.0000 151.0160 Worker ,■ { i 1
•
.
'

0.28q9 ,.0.1782 2.1827 7.7300e003 0.9306 6.4200e- 003 0.9371 0.2472 5.91 OOe- 003 0.2531 0.0000 699.7098 699.7098 0.0148 0.0000 700,0805 Total 0.2934 0.6249 2.3115 9.2800e003 0.9718 6.9300e- 003 0.9787 0.2590 6.4000e- 003 0.2654 O.COOO 850.5151 850.5151 0.0233 0.0000 851.0965

3.9 Architec
Unmitigated
;tural Of
Constru
mating - ction On 2025 -Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BI0-CO2 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons/yr Ml/yr
Arcttit. Coating 1.0340
■t

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road
■■■
1 0.0248 0.1856 0.3108 5.0000e004 7.3900e- 003 7.3900e- 003 7.3400e- 003 7.3400e- 003 0.0000 43.4397 43.4397 4.9800e- 003 0.0000 43.5644 Total 1.0588 0.1856 0.3108 5.0000e004 7.3SOOe- 003 7.3900e- 003 7.34C0e- 003 7.3400e- 003 0.0000 43.4397 43.4397 4.gSOOe- 003 0.0000 43.5644 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMocl.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM

3.9 Architectural Coating - 2025
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PIVI10
Exhaust
Pf^lO
PH^IO
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Pl^2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Categoiy tons/yr Ml•/yr
Hauling
Vendor
1 0.0000
' 2.5200e-
; 003

0.0000

0.0304

0.0000

0.0261

0.0000

3.1000e004

0.0000

8.3200e003

0.0000
I.OOOOe004

0.0000

8.4200e003

0.0000

2.4000e003

0.0000
l.OOOOe004

0.0000

2.5000e003

0.0000
"o.booo"

0.0000

30.5077

0.0000

30.5077

0.0000

1.71006-
003

0.00000.0000

0.0000
"3"o!5"5b4 '
Worker 1 0.0656 0.0416 0.5095 1.81006- i63".4l"4b"
003

0.2172 1.5000e003 0.2187 0.0577 1.3800e- 003 0.0591 0.0000 163.3275 163.3275 3.4600e- 003 0.0000 Total 0.0681 0.1320 0.5355 2.1200e003 0.2256 1.60008- 003 0.2272 0.0601 1.4800e- 003 0.0616 0.0000 193.8352 193.8352 5.17006- 003 0.0000 193.9644 Mitiaated Constructicin On-Site
1 - -n . (
r
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PIVI10
PM10
Total
Fugitive ;
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
: PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBid-C02 Total C02 CH4 . N20 C02e
Category
•! • ' > ' . t
tons^r .(**
f'HMlyyr sV>, ■'
Archit. Coating
Off-Road"
; 1.03401
riToSi"""
1 ""aiiie"' ~~a3io8~" S^OOobe"'
004

0.0000
"iibbe^"
003

0.0000
~7.390b~'
003

0.0000
""7.34006^"
003

0.0000
"T34Clb^"'
003

0.0000
"o.booo"

0.0000

43.4336

0.0000

43.4396

0.0000

4.9900e003

0.00000.0000

0.0000
"43V643"
Total 1.0588 0.1856 0.3108 5.0000e004 7.3900e- 003 7.3900e- 003 7.3400e- 003 7.3400e- 003 0.0000 43.4396 43.4398 4.9900e- 003 0.0000 43.5643 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM

3.9 Architectural Coating - 2025
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
Pitflio:,.

Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.S
Total
Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N2p C92e
Category tons/yr Ml•/yr
Hauiing >
!
■
1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Q.OOOO 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor
■■■
• 2.5200e-
; 003

0.0904 0.0261 3.1000e004 8.3200e- 003 I.OOOOe- 004 8.4200e- 003 2.4000e- 003 I.OOOOe- 004 2.5000e- 003 0.0000 30.5077 30.5077 1.7100e- 003 0.0000 30.5504 Worker
■■
• 0.0656 0.0416 0.5095 l.eiooe003 0.2172 I.SOOOe- 003 0.2187 0.0577 1.3800e- 003 0.0591 0.0000 163.3275 163.3275 3.4600e- 003 0.0000 163.4140 Total 0.0881 0.1320 0.5355 2.1200e003 0.2256 1.6000e- 003 0.2272 0.0601 1.4800e- 003 0.0616 0.0000 193.8352 193.8352 S.1700e- 003 0.0000 193.9644

3.10 Paving
Unmitigated
-2025
Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road •
■

0.0217 0.1986 0.2399 3.6000e004 0.0114 0.0114 0.0105 0.0105 0.0000 30.7227 30.7227 9.6000e- 003 0.0000 30.9628 Paving j
■
■

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0217 0.1986 0.2399 3.6000e004 0.0114 0.0114 0.0105 0.0105 0.0000 30.7227 30.7227 9.6000e- 003 0.0000 30.9628 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM

3.10 Paving - 2025
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons^r Ml■/yr
Hauling 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor • 1.2600e-
! 003

0.0452 0.0130 i.eoooe004 4.1600e- 003 S.OOOOe- 005 4.2100e- 003 1.2000e- 003 S.OOOOe- 005 1.2500e- 003 0.0000 15.2539 15.2539 8.50008- 004 0.0000 15.2752 Worker • 5.4600e-
; 003

3.4700e003 0.0425 1.5000e- 004 0.0181 1.2000e- 004 0.0182 4.81 OOe- 003 I.IOOOe- 004 4.9200e- 003 0.0000 13.6106 13.6106 2.90008- 004 0.0000 13.6178 Total 6.7200e003 0.0487 0.0555 3.1000e- 004 0.0223 1.7000e- 004 0.0224 e.oiooe- 003 1.60000- 004 6.1700e- 003 0.0000 28.8645 28.8645 I.l400e- 003 0.0000 28.8930 Mitigated Constructic
, ■ t ■
}n On-Si
■'
te
;[■ (t
1 f
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons/yr M7 /yrOff-Road 1 0.0217 0.1986 0.2399 3.60008- 004

0.0114 0.0114 0.0105 0.0105 0.0000 30.7226 30.7226 9.60008- 003

0.0000 30.9627
Paving ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0217 0.1986 0.2399 3.6000e004 0.0114 0.0114 0.0105 0.0105 0.0000 30.7226 30.7226 9.6000e- 003 0.0000 30.9627 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM

3.10 Paving -2025
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual ROG NOx- CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
^M2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- 002 NBio-C02 Total 002 CH4 N2p C02e
Category tons/yr Mlhp
Hauling 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor ■ 1.2600e1 003 0.0452 0.0130 I.OOOOe- 004 4.1600e- 003 5.0000e- 005 4.21 OOe- 003 1.2000e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.2500e- 003 0.0000 15.2539 15.2539 8.5000e- 004 0.0000 15.2752 Worker • 5.4600e-
; 003

3.4700e003 0.0425 1.5000e- 004 0.0181 1.2000e- 004 0.0182 4.81 OOe- 003 I.IOOOe- 004 4.9200e- 003 0.0000 13.6106 13.6106 2.9000e- 004 0.0000 13.6178 Total 6.7200e003 0.0487 0.0555 3.1000e- 004 0.0223 1.70000- 004 0.0224 6.01 OOe- 003 I.SOOOe- 004 6.1700e- 003 0.0000 28.8645 28.8645 1.1400e- 003 0.0000 28.8930

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
Increase Density
Increase Diversity
Improve Walkablllty Design
Increase Transit Accessibility
Improve Pedestrian Network
Provide Traffic Calming Measures
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5.

PM2.5
Total
Bio-002 NBiCh 002 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated • 0.7029
1 3.4152 6.6427 0.0253 2.2358 0.0192 2.2550 0.5989 0.0178 0.6167 0.0000 2,346.809 0 2,346.809
0 0.1140 0.0000 2,349.660
0 Unmitigated ■ 0.7521
1 3.6863 7.8766 0.0313 2.8495 0.0234 2.8729 0.7633 0.0217 0.7850 0.0000 2,907.239 8 2,907.239
8 0.1350 0.0000 2,910.615
2 4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
|| Land ijsa ' , ] Weekday Saturday Sunday ' (?: i:;, Annual VMT Annual VMT Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00
23^79
963!70
27206~92
894!i3
O.OO 1 1
1 Heaith Club 367.80
...
298.65 ■
m
724,383 568,374
Hotel 961.40 700.35 ■ 2,205,862 1,730,788
Quality Restaurant 2,103.55 1687.55 ■ 2,931,094 2,299,828 Strip Mali 943.24 434.65 • 1,643,138 : 1,289,258
Total 4,375.99 4,298.34 3,121.21 7,504,477 5,888,247

4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-WorC-W H-S or C-C H-O orC-NW H-WorC-W H-S or C-C 1 H-OorC-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0 0 0 Heaith Club 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.90 ; 64.10 1 19.00 52 39 9 Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19740 T 61.60 f 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 16.60 ; 8.40 6.90 lijbo "[ 69.00 f 19.00 38 18 44 Strip Mail 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.60 64.40 ; 19.00 45 40 15 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land. Use , . , - IDA | LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 , MHD 1 HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Enclosed Parking with EleVator 0.5541291 0.042164 0.205182 0.113554 0.013848 0.005806 0.0219921 0.033191 0.002140 0.001609 0.004858 0.000715 0.000811 Health Club 0.554129 ; 0.042164
•

0.205182 0.113554 0.013848 0.005806 0.0219921 0.033191 0.002140 0.001609 0.004858 0.000715 0.000811 Hotel 0.554129; 0.042164 0.205182 0.1135541 0.013848 0.005806 0.0219921 0.033191 0.002140 0.001609 0.004858 0.000715 0.000811 Quality Restaurant 0.554129; 0.042164 0.205182 0.113554 j 0.013848 0.005806 0.0219921 0.033191 1 0.002140 0.001609 0.004858 0.000715 0.000811
Strip Mall 0.554129; 0.042164 0.205182 0.113554 ; 0.013848; 0.005806 0.021992; 0.033191 0.002140 0.001609 0.004858 0.000715 0.000811

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
Install High Efficiency Lighting
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 542.6764 542.6764 0.0432 8.9500e003 546.4229 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 542.6764 542.6764 0.0432 8.9500e003 546.4229 NaturaiGas
Mitigated
NaturaiGas
Unmitigated ■

0.0524

0.0524-'

0.4761
*'0.4761;

0.4000
• 0.4000

2.8600e0032.8600e003

0.0362

0.0362

0.0362

0.0362

0.0362
().0362

0.03620.0362
111

0.0000

0.0000
518.3264
518.3264
518.3264518.3264

9.9300e003

9.9300e003

9.5000e003

9.5000e003
521.4066521.4066
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
sUse
ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
. Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total :

Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr Ml•/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 > 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Health Club 665772 • 3.5900e-
; 003

0.0326 0.0274 2.0000e004 2.4800e- 003 2.4800e- 003 2.4800e- 003 2.4800e- 003 0.0000 35.5282 35.5282 • 6.8000e- • 6.5000e- • 35.7393 ; 004 ; 004 ; 1 1 •
Hotel 3.21565e
+006
1 0.0173 0.1576 0.1324 9.5000e004 0.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0000 171.5991 171.5991 • 3.2900e- I 003 3.1500e- 003 172.6189 Quality
Restaurant

5.79069e
+006
1 0.0312 0.2839 0.2384 1.7000e003 0.0216 0.0216 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 309.0134 309.0134 5.9200e- 003 5.6700e- 003 310.8497 Strip Mall 40960.6 > 2.2000e-
; 004

2.01 OOe003 1.6900e- 003 I.OOOOe- 005 • 1.5000e- ; 004 1.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 2.1858 2.1858 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 2.1988 Total 0.0524 0.4761 0.4000 2.8600e003 0.0362 0.0362 0.0362 0.0362 0.0000 518.3264 518.3264 9.9300e- 003 9.5100e- 003 521.4066 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 42 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated
NaturalGa
sUse
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C028
Land Use kBTUyyr tons/yr Ml•/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000
11 1

0.0000 - • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Health Club 665772 3.5900e003 0.0326 0.0274 2.0000e- 004 ■ 2.4800e- ; 003 1 2.4800e003 2.46008- 003 2.4800e- 003 0.0000 35.5282 35.5282 6.8000e- 004 6.50008- 004 35.7393 Hotel 3.21565e
•H)06

0.0173 0.1576 0.1324 9.5000e004 i 0.0120 11
1 0.0120 0.0120 0.0120 0.0000 171.5991 171.5991 3.2900e003 3.15008- • 172.6189 003 ; 1 Quality
Restaurant

5.79069e
+006

0.0312 0.2839 0.2384 1.7000e003 • 0.0216 11
1 0.0216 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 309.0134 309.0134 5.9200e003 5.67008- • 310.8497 003 ; 1 Strip Mall 40960.6 2.2000e004 2.01 OOe- 003 1.6900e- 003 I.OOOOe- 005 1.50008- 004 1.50008- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.50008- 004 0.0000 2.1858 2.1858 4.00008- 005 4.00008- 005 2.1988 Total 0.0524 0.4761 0.4000 2.86008-
003

0.0362 0.0362 0.0362 0.0362 o.cooo 518.3264 518.3264 9.9300e003 9.51008- 003 521.4066 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 43 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
417232 ; 68.8882 5.4300e003 1.1400e- 003 69.3638
Health Club 408291 ; 67.4120 5.3700e003 I.IIOOe- 003 67.8774 Hotel 1.01646eJ' 167.8245
■fOOB il

0.0134 2.7700e003 168.9832
Quality
Restaurant

1.10765e
+006
; 182.8813 0.0146 3.01 OOe003 184.1439
Strip Mail 337176 1 55.6703 4.4400e003 9.2000e- 004 56.0547 Total 542.6764 0.0432 8.95006-
003
546.4229
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Mitigated
Electricity
Use
Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
417232 68.8882 5.4900e003 1.1400e- 003 69.3638
Health Club 408291 67.4120 5.3700e003 I.IIOOe- 003 67.8774 Hotel 1.01646e
+006
167.8245 0.0134 • 2.7700e- • 168.9832
; 003 ;
Quality
Restaurant

1.10765e
+006
182.8813 0.0146 3.01 OOe003 184.1439
Strip Mall 337176 55.6703 4.4400e003 9.2000e- 004 56.0547 Total 542.6764 0.0432 8.95000-
003
546.4229

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 45 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
FugltiV0
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
B!o-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tonsyyr Ml•/yr
Mitigated ■
■■
Unmitigated ■
BB

0.9069

0.9069

4.00000-
005

4.0000e005

4.84000-
003

4.84000-
003

0.0000

0.0000

2.0000e0052.0000e005

2.00000-
005

2.00000-
005

2.00000-
005

2.00000-
005

2.00000-
005

2.00000-
005

0.00000.0000

9.4300e0039.4300e003

9.4300e003

9.4300e003

2.00000-
005

2.00000-
005

0.0000

0.0000

0.0100

0.0100

6.2 Area by SubCategoiy
Unmitigated
i
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bi0-CO2 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 CO20
SubCategory tons/yr Ml-/yr
Architactural •
Coating I
B

0.1034 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumar •
Products I
B

0.8030 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping ■
B
B

4.50000-
004

4.00000-
005

4.84000-
003

0.0000 2.00000-
005

2.00000-
005

2.00000-
005

2.00000-
005

0.0000 9.43000-
003

9.43000-
003

2.00000-
005

0.0000 0.0100
Total 0.9069 4.0000e005 4.84000- 003 0.0000 2.00000- 005 2.00000- 005 2.00000- 005 2.00000- 005 0.0000 9.43000- 003 9.43000- 003 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0100 CalEEMod Version: CalEEI\/!od.2016.3.2 Page 46 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
SubCategory tons/yr Mlvyr
Architectural
Coating
Consumer
Products
1 0.10341 0.8030

0.00000.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.00000.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.00000.0000

0.00000.0000

0.00000.0000

0.00000.0000
Landscaping • 4.5000e-
; 004

4.0000e005 4.8400e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 9.4300e- 003 9.4300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0100 Total 0.9069 4.0000e005 4.8400e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 9.4300e- 003 9.4300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0100

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Apply Water Conservation Strategy
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 47 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated •
••

41.9236 0.4774 0.0118 57.3849
Unmitigated |
■
' «

41.9296 0.4774 0.0118 57.3849

7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
1 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Land Use Mgai MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0/0 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Heaitn Club 2.17528/

1.33324
1 7.8123 0.0715 1.7300e003 10.1323
Hotel 2.91718/

0.324131
• 7.7916 ' 0.0956• 1
1 1

2.3600e003 10.8843
Quality
Restaurant

7.61566/

0.486106
; 19.6804 0.2495 6.1400e003 27.7497
strip Mall 1.85033/

1.13407
; 6.6453 0.0608 1.5200e003 8.6187
Total 41.9236 0.4774 0.0118 57.3849
CalEEMod Version: CarEEMod.2016,3.2 Page 48 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual

7.2 Water by Land Use
Mitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Land Use Mgal 1 MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0/0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Health Club 2.17528/

1.33324

7.8123 0.0715 1.7900e003 10.1323
Hotel 2.91718/

0.324131

7.7916 0.0956 2.36000-
003

10.8843
Quality
Restaurant

7.61566/

0.486106

19.6804 0.2495 6.1400e003 27.7497
strip Mall 1.85033/

1.13407

6.6453 0.0608 1.5200e003 8.6187
Total 41.9298 0.4774 0.0118 57.3849

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
'I , ' i" : • If.')"
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 49 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Category/Year
Totai C02 CH4 N20 C02e
MT/yr
Mitigated ■ 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated • 65.3083 3.8586 0.0000 161.7985

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Land Use tons 1 MT/yr
Enciosed Parking
witti Elevator
0 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Health Club 209.65 1 42.5571 2.5151 0.0000 105.4333
Hotel 62.96 1 12.7803 0.7553 0.0000 31.6627
Quality
Restaurant

22.89 ; 4.6465 0.2746 0.0000 11.5114
Strip Mali 26.23 • 5.3245 0.3147 0.0000 13.1911
Total 65.3083 3.8598 0.0000 161.7985
CalEEMod''Version:'CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 50 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Mitigated
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Waste
Disposed
Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Land Use tons 1 MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
*■ 0.0000
illlII

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Health Club J' 0.0000
ifIt

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel
llJ» 0.0000llll
ll

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Quality
Restaurant
i' 0.0000llllll

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Strip Mall }• 0.0000 il
ll
ll

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

9.0 Operational Offroad
Eqi|ipment Type . ^ j Number Hours/Day | DaysA'ear | Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emerqency Generators
Equipment Type Number 1 Hours/Day HoursA'ear | Horse Power 1 Load Factor 1 Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number 1 Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year j Boiler Rating 1 Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 51 of 51 Date: 2/23/2022 11:32 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Annual User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number

11.0 Vegetation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM

1.0 Project Characteristics
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Cheval Bianc - Construction and Operations
South Coast Air Basin, Summer

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size 1 Metric 1 Lot Acreage 1 Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 178.00 Space 1
1 1.60 71,200.00 0
Health Club 36.78 lOOOsqft 11 0.84 36,783.00 0
Hotel 115.00 Room 1
1 3.83 134,097.00 0
Quality Restaurant 25.09 lOOOsqft 1
1 0.58 25,094.00 0
Strip Mall 24.98 lOOOsqft 11 0.57 24,976.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Ciimate Zone
Urban
11 .

Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31
Operational Year 2026
Utility Company Southern California Edison
C02 intensity 364
(Ib/MWhr)
CH4 Intensity
(Ib/MWhr)

0.029 N20 Intensity
(Ib/MWhr)

0.006

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Defauit Data
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Land Use - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Construction Phase - Construction phases consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to IndividualConstruction Phase Lengths." Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Trips and VMT - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Reductions of Hauling Trip Numbers." Demolition - See SWAPE comment on "Failure to Model Required Amount of Demolition." Grading - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Vehicle Trips - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Energy Use - See SWAPE comment on "Overestimated Reduction to Energy Use Value." Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Energy Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Water Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Waste Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Table Name 1 Column Name 1 Default Value 1 New Value
tbIConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 1 22.00tbIConstructionPhase NumDays ^ 20.00 t 32.00 tbIConstructionPhase NumDays 230.00 t t'o'g.ootbIConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 1 23.00 tbIConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 1 82.00tbIConstructionPhase NumDays 230LOO 1 49.00 tbIConstructionPhase NumDays iiaoo t 5'44.dbtbIConstructionPhase NumDays ^ 20.00 t 132.00
tbIConstructionPhase NumDays 20,.6b 1 66.00
tbIGrading AcresOfGrading aob t 41.00tbIGrading MaterialExported 0.00 I 34,564.00 tbIGrading > MaterialExported 0.00 1 90,356.00
t&LandUse LandUseSquareFeet 36,780.00 1 36,783.00
tbILandUse LandUseSquarePeet 166,980.00 j 134,097.00tbILandUse LandUseSquareFeet isiooabb | "25.0V4.60'tbILandUse LandUseSquareFeet 24,980.bo t "24,9'7"6.6o' tbIOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247!bb 1 203.6btbIOffRoadEquipment Load Factor OC
OC
ci
§
d
L
tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 1 2.00 tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
0 0
ic\
0 0
CO
tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1L
1 1
CO
b
0 u
ro
b
0 tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 1 2.00 tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 1 "2.60"tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1 0.00tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.bo t 0.00 tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 ; 2.00 CalEEMof;!, Version; CalEEMod.2016.3.2 ^ Page 4 of - Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer tblOtfRoadEquipment OttRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOflRoadEquipmeht OttRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOtfRoadEquipment OttRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tbIOffR oadEq uipment OttRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
1 11 11 11 1i1 11 11 1 lOo QI Ol O1 11 11 11 11 11 1 1 11 11 11 1|co\i {CO }co jcjd 1j|dc dc cvi t-: 1=|0 |lO O 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 1 1 1

0.00 tblOtfRoadEquipment OttRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 tblOtfRoadEquipment OttRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00
tblOtfRoadEquipment OttRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00
tblOtfRoadEquipment OttRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00
tblOtfRoadEquipment OttRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00
tblOtfRoadEquipment OttRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00tblOtfRoadEquipment OttRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 tblOtfRoadEquipment OttRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00
tblOtfRoadEquipment OttRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00tblOtfRoadEquipment OttRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 tblOtfRoadEquipment OttRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00
tblOtfRoadEquipment OttRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00
tblOtfRoadEquipment OttRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
• • m

3.00 2.00
tblOtfRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00
tblOtfRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00tblOtfRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00tblOtfRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 'f.oo"
7o£^

8.00 tblOtfRoadEquipment , UsageHours 8.00
tblOttl^oadEq uipment UsageHours 8.00
tbIProJectCtiaracteristics C02lntensityFaGtor 364
tbITripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 40.00tbITripsAndVMT VendorTripLengtti 40.00tbITripsAndVMT VendorTripLengtti 6.90 40.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer tbITripsAndVMT H VendorTripLength ■■ 6.90 f 40.00
tbITripsAndVMT 1 VendorTripNumber ■■ 0.00 11 60.00tbITripsAndVMT ; VendorTripNumber ■■ 0.00 11 120.00tbITripsAndVMT ; VendorTripNumber ■■ ■

48.00 1
1 100.00
tbITripsAndVMT 1 VendorTripNumber ■■ 0.00 11 60.00tbITripsAndVMT 1 VendorTripNumber a aa

0.00 1
1 120.00
tbiTripsAndVMT ; VendorTripNumber a
a

48.00 48fo"b
11 100.00
tbITripsAndVMT ; VendorTripNumber aa 11 50.00tbITripsAndVMT ; VendorTripNumber a a

0.00 1

20.00 tbITripsAndVMT , ; VendorTripNumber •
a
0,00
A
11 20.00
: 'tbITripsAndVMT ; VendorVehicleClass a
a HDT_Mix 11 HHDT
tbITripsAndVMT ; VendorVehicleClass ■
a HDT_Mix 11 HHDT
tbITripsAndVMT ; VendorVehicleClass a
a HDT_Mix 11 HHDT
tbITripsAndVMT ; VendorVehicleClass a
a HDT_Mix 11 HHDT
tbITripsAndVMT ; VendorVehicleClass a■
a
HDT_Mix 11 HHDT
tbITripsAndVMT ; VendorVehicleClass a
a
HDT.Mix 1
1 HHDT
tbITripsAndVMT ; WorkerTripNumber a
aa

18.00 1
1 50.00
tbITripsAndVMT ; WorkerTripNumber a
a

25.00 1
1 136.00
tbiTripsAndVMT ; WorkerTripNumber a
a
120.00 1
1 200.00
tbITripsAndVMT ; WorkerTripNumber a
a

18.00 1
1 50.00
tbITripsAndVMT ; WorkerTripNumber a
a

25.00 1
1 136.00
tbITripsAndVMT ; WorkerTripNumber a
a
120.00 1
1 200.00
tbITripsAndVMT ; WorkerTripNumber a
a
120.00 1
1 650.00
tbITripsAndVMT ; WorkerTripNumber a
a

24.00 1
1 300.00
tbITripsAndVMT 1 WorkerTripNumber a
a

10.00 1
1 50.00
tbIVehicleTrips ; ST_TR aa 20.87 11 6.34tbIVehicleTrips ; ST_TR aa 8.19 • 8.38 CalEEMod|yersiqn;jGalEElVlod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of ^4 .

Cheval Blane - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM
tbIVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 87.96tbIVehicleTrips ST_TR ; 42.04 1 35.81tbIVehicleTrips SU_TR "1" 26.73 1 8.12 tbIVehicleTrips SU_TR y 5.95 1 6.09tbIVehicleTrips SU_TR y 72.16 1 67.26tbIVehicleTrips SU_TR y 20.43 t 17.40tbIVehicleTrips WD_TR ; 32.93 } 10.00tbIVehicleTrips WD_TR : 8.17 1 8.36tbIVehicleTrips WD_TR ; 89.95 1 83.84 tbIVehicleTrips WD_TR ; 44.32 ; 37.76

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overaii Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive
PM1D
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PMZ5
PM2.5
Total
BIP-C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Year .
. , '■ C"' . v.* ' ' • ? / < -*' ■ i J lb/day ib/day ^
2022 • 5.7017
1 105.3388 51.0397 0.3463 10.3603 1.4260 11.7863 2.5615 1.3463 3.9078 0.0000 36,794.99 21 36,794.99
21 3.5478 0.0000 36,883.68
64 2023
■
; 7.3486 100.0955 77.6497 0.4226 17.3951 1.8665 19.2616 4.5377 1.7690 6.3067 0.0000 44,500.21 97 44,500.21
97 4.4246 0.0000 44,610.83
42 2024 1 4.1750 20.4783 40.2913 0.1115 7.5854 0.7366 8.3220 2.0189 0.7058 2.7248 0.0000 11,034.48 99 11,034.48
99 0.7903 0.0000 11,054.24
74 2025 > 21.8819
t

31.5072 61.2850 0.1704 11.7535 1.1320 12.8855 3.1302 1.0749 4.2050 0.0000 16,896.75 48 16,896.75
48 1.3009 0.0000 16,929.27
84 Maximum 21.8819 105.3388 77.6497 0.4226 17.3951 1.8665 19.2616 4.5377 1.7690 6.3067 O.OGOO 44,500.21 97 44,500.21
97 4.4246 0.0000 44,610.83
42 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx' CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Year lb/day
A • .
lb/(jay
; ! ■
2022 • 5.7017 105.3388 51.0397 0.3463 10.3603 1.4260 11.7863 2.5615 1.3463 3.9078 0.0000 36.794.99 21 36,794.99
21 3.5478 0.0000 36,883.68
64 2023
2024
1 7.3486
; 4.1750
100.0955

20.4783

77.6497

40.2913

0.4226

0.1115

17.3951

7.5854

1.8665

0.7366

19.2616

8.3220

4.5377

2.0169

1.7690

0.7058

6.3067

2.7248
; 0.0000

0.0000
44,500.21
97 11,034.48
99 44,500.21
97 11,034.48
99 4.4246

0.7903

0.0000

0.0000
44,610.83
42 11,054.24
74 2025 ; 21.8819 31.5072 61.2850 0.1704 11.7535 1.1320 12.8855 3.1302 1.0749 4.2050 0.0000 16,896.75 48 16,896.75
48 1.3009 0.0000 16,929.27
64 Maximum 21.8819 105.3388 77.6497 0.4226 17.3951 1.8665 19.2616 4.5377 1.7690 6.3067 0.0000 44,500.21 97 44,500.21
97 4.4246 0.0000 44,610.83
42 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BIO-C02 NBIO-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 r"?,
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM

2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
Chevai Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Bchaust
PM10
PM10
Totai
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 4.9702 3.5000e004 0.0387 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0831 0.0831 2.2000e- 004 0.0885 Energy 0.2870 2.6089 2.1915 0.0157 0.1983 0.1983 0.1983 0.1983 3,130.723 8 3,130.723
8 0.0600 0.0574 3,149.328
1 Mobile 4.8057 21.2175 47.5839 0.1912 17.0471 0.1372 17.1842 4.5595 0.1273 4.6867 19,556.97 64 19,556.97
64 0.8718 19,578.77
24 Total 10.0828 23.8266 49.8141 0.2069 17.0471 0.3356 17.3826 4.5595 0.3257 4.8852 22,687.78 32 22,687.78
32 0.9321 0.0574 22,728.18
91 Mitiaated Op
. 1
erationa1
. •.«#
1 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Totai
Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e'
Category Ib/day ib/day
Area 4.9702 3.5000e004 0.0387 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0831 0.0831 2.2000e- 004 0.0885 Energy 0.2870 2.6089 2.1915 0.0157 0.1983 0.1983 0.1983 0.1983 3,130.723 8 3,130.723
8 0.0600 0.0574 3,149.328
1 Mobile 4.5119 19.7457 39.7082 0.1543 13.3757 0.1126 13.4883 3.5775 0.1045 3.6820 15,789.70 67 15,789.70
67 0.7333 15,808.03
92 Total 9.7690 22.3650 41.9383 0.1699 13.3757 0.3111 13.6867 3.5775 0.3029 3.8804 18,920.51 36 18,920.51
36 0.7935 0.0574 18,957.45
58 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMocl.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer ROG NOx CO 802 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
,
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.S
Total
Bio- 002 NBio-C02 Total 002 CH4 N20
• ' '
C02e
Percent '
Reduction
• 2.S2 '6.18 15.81 17.87 21.54 7.31 21.26 21.54 7.00 20.57 0.00 16.60 16.60 14.86 0.00 16.59

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase 1 - DemolitionPhase 1 - Grading
Phase Description
■Demolition■^Grading
111/1/2022
Phase 1 - Building Construction ^Building Construction
112/1/2022
-1-
11/16/2023
Phase 2 - Demolition
Phase 2 - Excavation
■Demolition •5/1/2023
; Grading •6/1/2023
Phase 2 - Garage Construction 'Building ConstructionPhase 2 - Hotel Construction Architectural Coating
Paving
; Building Construction
; 9/24/2023lii/lJioiaT
^Architectural Coating lyZiTiobT; Paving '10/1/2025
11/30/2022
i7l57202T"
67i57202Y"5^"i^023""
9^37202^"
i7/3072023"12^1^025'12/3172025"
5j
-4-
22|
4 5' 32'
-4 4
5! 109|
4 23;
4 82;
4* '
49!
-4-
5|
-4-
5;
-4-
5|
12/31/2025
_4_
5!
_4_
5;
544;
-——4' •
132;
4 66;
—i.

Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0
Acres of Paving: 1.6
Residential lndoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 331,425; Non-Residential Outdoor: 110,475; Striped Parking Area: 4,272 (Architectural Coating - sqft)
OffRoad Equipment
Phl^se Name . Offroad Equipment Type | Amount 1 Usage Hours | Horse Power | . Load Factor Phase 1 - Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1; 8.00; 81; 0.73 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Phase 1 Demolition ■Excavators •
■ •
2 8.00*
• 1
158* 0.38
Phase 1 Demolition ; Paving Equipment "5" 2 8.00 •1 132; 0.36Phase 1 Demolition •Rubber Tired Dozers • ■ 1
0 8.00>
1 247; 0.40
Phase 1 Demolition ; Rubber Tired Dozers < 1 8.00; 203; 0.36Phase 1 Demolition "T ractors/Loaders/Backhoes ■ ■ 1
1 8.00 •
1 97; 0.37
Phase 1 Grading ; Bore/Drill Rigs • 2 8.00'
1 221; 0.50
Phase 1 Grading ■Cranes i
• 1
2 8.00; 231; 0.29
Phase 1 Grading ; Excavators « 2 8.00; 158; 0.38Phase 1 Grading jGraders i 0 8.00; 187; 0.41Phase 1 Grading ; Pumps ■ 2 o'.ooi 1 84; 0.74
Phase 1 Grading ■Rubber Tired Dozers •
• 1
0 :• 8.00; 247; 0.40
Phase 1 Grading ■Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes •
• 1
2 8.00; 97; 0.37
Phase 1 Building Construction ■Aerial Lifts ■
■ 1
2 8.00'
1 63; 0.31
Phase' 1, BUildmg cinstruciidrf ?: ' ■Cranes i • 1 1 8.00; 231; 0.29Phase 1 Building Construction ■Forklifts 1 • 1
0 8.00*
1 89; 0.20
Phase 1 Building Construction ■Generator Sets >
■ 1
0 8.00!
1 84; 0.74
Phase 1 Building Construction ; Pumps I 2 8.001
1 84; 0.74
Phase 1 Building Construction jRough Terrain Forklifts « 1 8.00 S 1 100; 0.40
Phase 1 Building Construction ■Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ■ ■ 1
2 8.00; 97; 0.37
Phase 1 Building Construction jWelders • 1 8.00; 46; 0.45Phase 2 Demolition ■Concrete/lndustria Saws > ■ 1
1 8.00; 81; 0.73
Phase 2 Demolition ■Excavators •
• 1
2 8.00!
1 158; 0.38
Phase 2 Demolition ; Paving Equipment • 2 8.00; 132; 0.36Phase 2 Demolition •Rubber Tired Dozers ■ ■ 1
0 8.00'
1 247; 0.40
Phase 2 Demolition ■ Rubber Tired Loaders >
■ 1
1 8.00; 203; 0.36
Phase 2 Demolition jTractors/Loaders/Backhoes • 1 8".o6«1 97; 0.37Phase 2 Excavation •Bore/Drill Rigs ; 2; 8.00; 221; 0.50 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMocl.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Phase 2 - Excavation ■Cranes •
■ 1
2 8.00'
■ 1
2311
•

0.29 Phase 2'-Excavation) r'- : 5 Excavators 2 8.00; 158; 0.38 Phase 2 - Excavation ■Graders "
■ 1
0 8.00 •
1 187; 0.41
Phase 2 - Excavation ; Pumps 1 2 8.00; 84; 0.74Phase 2 - Excavation ^Rubber Tired Dozers « 0 8.001 1 247; 0.40
Phase 2 - Excavation ■Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ■
• 1
2 8.00; 97; 0.37
Phase 2 - Garage Construction "Aerial Lifts i
■ 1
2 8.00*
1 63; 0.31
Phase 2 • Garage Construction •Cranes ■
■ 1
1 8.00; 231; 0.29
Phase 2 • Garage Construction ■Forklifts ■
■ 1
0 8.00; 89; 0.20
Phase 2 - Garage Construction ^Generator Sets • 0 8.00; 00 0.74
Phase 2 - Garage Construction ; Pumps • 2 8.00!
1 84; 0.74
Phase 2 - Garage Construction ; Rough Terrain Forklifts ■ 1 8.001 1 100; 0.40
Phase 2 - Garage Construction •T ractors/Loaders/Backhoes • ■ 1
2 8.00; 97; 0.37
Phase 2 - Garage Construction ■Welders ■
■ 1
1 8.001
t 46; 0.45
Phase 2 ■ Hotel Construction "Aerial Lifts ■
■ 1
2 8.001
f 63; 0.31
Phase 2 - Hotel Construction ;Air Compressors > 1 8.001 1 78; 0.48
Phase 2 - Hotel Construction " Concrete/I nd ustrial Saws < ■ 1
1 o'.oo^
1 81;
1 0.73
Phase 2 - Hotel Construction •Cranes •
" 1
1 8.00!
1 231; 0.29
Phase 2 - Hotel Construction "Forklifts ■
• 1
2 8.00; 89; 0.20
Phase 2 - Hotel Construction "Generator Sets •
■ 1
1 8.001
f 1 84; 0.74
Phase 2 - Hotel Construction ; Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes • 1 8.00; 97; 0.37Phase 2 - Hotel Construction "Welders " • 1
1 8.001
1 46; 0.45
ArchitecturaliGpating'-i if,«';:>v^i'i ' I ■Aerial Lifts • ^ ® 1 1 8.00; 63; 0.31Architectural Coating ;Air Compressors " ■ 1
2 6.00!
1 78; 0.48
Paving jCement and Mortar Mixers • 1 8.00; 9; 0.56
Paving ; Pavers •
" Xm
0 8.00; 130; 0.42
Paving ; Paving Equipment ; i; 8.00; 132- 0.36
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Paving ■Rollers
■
1; 8.00; 80; 0.38
Paving ; Trenchers 1 1; 8.00; 78; 0.50
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Phase 1 ■ Demolition 7j 50.00 60.00 124.00' 14.70i 40.00 j 20.00 LD_Mix iHHDT }HHDT j 4.Phase 1 - Grading lOj 136.00 120.00" 4,321.00' 14.70c 40.00' 20.00 4 1 i' 1 LD Mix iHHDT jHHDT j j...Phase 1 - Building Phase 2 - Demolition
9} 200.00 100.00| 0.00; 14.701 6.90 | 20.00 LD_Mix iHHDT }HHDT7i 50.00 1 60.00} 135.00; 14.701 40.00} 20.00 LD_Mix iHHDT }HHDT Phase 2 - Excavatibn . 1 . " 10| 136.00 120.00} 11,295.00' 14.70? 40.00 } 20.00 4 1 j LD_Mix iHHDT }HHDTPhase 2 - Garage 9; 200.00 100.00 j 0.00 J 14.70l 6.90] 20.00 LD_Mix iHHDT }HHDTPhase 2 - Hotel 101 650.00 50.00} 0.00; 14.70} 6.90} 20.00 LD_Mix }HDT_Mix }HHDT I 4.

Architectural Coating 3j 300.00 20.00 } 0.00; 14!7o! 6.90} 20.00 LD.Mix }HDT_Mix }HHDT Paving 4; 50.00 20.00; 0.00; 14.70; 6.90; 20.00 ;LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix ;HHDT

3.1 Mitigation Measures ConstructionWater Exposed Area
• ■r t
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
•
, . . . Page 13 of 44 VTv.

Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM

3.2 Phase 1 - Demolition - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PIUI2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1
t

1.2215 0.0000 1.2215 0.1850 0.0000 0.1850 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road • 1.9029
11 18.0105 20.1544 0.0342 0.8904 0.8904 0.8312 0.8312 3,294.609 2 3,294.609
2 0.9062 3,317.264
0 Total 1.9029 18.0105 20.1544 0.0342 1.2215 0.8904 2.1119 0.1850 0.8312 1.0161 3,294.609 2 3,294.609
2 0.9062 3,317.264
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
i^OG NOx CO S02 Fugitive! --.

PIW110.

Exhaust
PltAlO
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PIVI2.5
[»haust
^i|VI2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBI0-CO2 Total C02 CH4 N20;
Category IbAiay
t.

Ib/day
' Hauling ' ■j i o:o4b7 1 1.3527 '03194 4.2700e003 0.0984^ 3.94006- 003 0.1024 0.0270 3l7700e- '003 0.0307 464.0619 464.0619 0.0326 464.8t61 Vendor ; 0.7800 23.4258 6.1745 0.0847 2.0946 0.0822 2.1768 0.5738 0.0786 0.6524 9,216.275 2 9,216.275
2 0.5983 9,231.232
1 Worker 1 0.1963 0.1233 1.7361 5.3500e003 0.5589 4.0200e- 003 0.5629 0.1482 3.7000e- 003 0.1519 533.6316 533.6316 0.0135 533.9687 Total 1.0171 24.9019 8.2300 0.0943 2.7520 0.0901 2.8421 0.7490 0.0861 0.8351 10,213.96 86 10,213.96
86 0.6443 10,230.07
69 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM

3.2 Phase 1 - Demolition - 2022
Mitigated Construction On-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer BOG NOX CO S02 Fugitive''
PM10-
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Er^haust
'PM2.5
PM2.5
Totai
B!o-C02 NBI0-CO2 Totai C02 CH4 N20 CO^e
Category lb/Jay lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.2215 0.0000 1.2215 0.1850 d.ooqo 0.1850 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road ; 1.9029 18.0105 20.1544 0.0342 0.8904 0.8904 0.8312 0.8312 0.0000 3,294.609 2 3,294.609
2 0.9062 3,317.264
0 Total 1.9029 18.0105 20.1544 0.0342 1.2215 0.8904 2.1119 0.1850 0.8312 1.0161 0.0000 3,294.609 2 3,294.609
2 0.9062 3,317.264
0 Mitiaated Constructi()n Off-SIte
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Totai
BIO-C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day tb/day
Hauling ; 0.0407 1.3527 0.3194 4.2700e003 0.0984 3.9400e- 003 0.1024 0.0270 3.7700e- 003 0.0307 464.0619 464.0619 0.0326 464.8761 VendorWorker
1 0.7800
1 0.1963

23.4258

0.1233

6.1745

1.7361

0.0847

5.3500e003

2.0946

0.5589

0.0822

4.0200e003

2.1768

0.5629

0.5738

0.1482

0.0786

3.7000e003

0.6524

0.1519
1 9,216.275
2 9,216.275
2 "sssliTr

0.5983
""b~6i35~"
9,231.232
1 533'.968V
Total 1.0171 24.9019 8.2300 0.0943 2.7520 0.0901 2.8421 0.7490 0.0861 0.8351 10,213.96 86 10,213.98
86 0.6443 10,230.07
69 i
.-t ■
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 44
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM

3.3 Phase 1 - Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PIW10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PIWI2.5
Exhaust
PIVi2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day ib/(Jay
Fugitive Dust ■
a
■

1.4809 0.0000 1.4809 0.1652 0.0000 0.1652 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road •
■
■
1 2.6323 25.7443 26.3168 0.0601 1.1564 1.1564 1.0888 1.0888 5.793.359 9 5,793.359
9 1.5343 5,831.716
7 Total 2.6323 25.7443 26.3168 0.0601 1.4809 1.1564 2.6373 0.1652 1.0888 1.2540 5,793.359 9 5,793.359
9 1.5343 5,831.716
7 Unmitigated Constructlon Off-Site ■1
1 r
.. . . • ' V- f '
r Flop 'Nor CO S02 Fugitive
Pk4lO
Exhaust
PI^IO
PM10
Total
Fugitive ■
Pl\^2.5
^haust
?M2i5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20
Category Ib/(Jay Ib/(lay i
Hauiing •
■•

0.9754 32.4074 7.6518 0.1022 3.1699 0.0944 3.2643 0.8454 0.0903 0.9357 11,117.60 40 11,117.60
40 0.7803 11,137.11
06 Vendor «
■a

1.5601 46.8517 12.3490 0.1694 4.1893 0.1643 4.3536 1.1477 0.1572 1.3049 18,432.55 03 18,432.55
03 1.1966 18.462.46
42 Worker •
aa

0.5340 0.3354 4.7222 0.0146 1.5202 0.0109 1.5311 0.4032 0.0101 0.4132 1,451.477 9 1,451.477
9 0.0367 1,452.394
9 Total 3.0694 79.5945 24.7229 0.2862 8.8794 0.2698 9.1490 2.3983 0.2575 2.6538 31,001.63 22 31,001.63
22 2.0135 31,051.96
97 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 44 Date: 2/23/202211:34 AM

3.3 Phase 1 - Grading - 2022
Mitigated Construction Orr^ite
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer ROG NOx ' CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
exhaust
hM2:5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total 002 CH4 N2Q C02e
Category lb/day ib/day
Fugitive Dust 1.4809 0.0000 1.4809 0.1652 0.0000 0.1652 0.0000 0.0000 Otf-Road ; 2.6323 25.7443 26.3168 0.0601 1.1564 1.1564 1.0888 1.0888 0.0000 5,793.359 9 5,793.359
9 1.5343 5,831.716
7 Total 2.6323 25.7443 26.3168 0.0601 1.4809 1.1564 2.6373 0.1652 1.0888 1.2540 0.0000 5,793.359 9 5,793.359
9 1.5343 5,831.716
7 Mitigated Constructic)n Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- 002 NBio- 002 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
Category Ib/day ib/day
Hauling ; 0.9754 32.4074 7.6518 0.1022 3.1699 0.0944 3.2643 0.8454 0.0903 0.9357 11,117.60 40 11,117.60
40 0.7803 11,137.11
06 Vendor 1 1.5601 46.8517 12.3490 0.1694 4.1893 0.1643 4.3536 1.1477 0.1572 1.3049 18,432.55 03 18,432.55
03 1.1966 18,462.46
42 Worker 1 0.5340 0.3354 4.7222 0.0146 1.5202 0.0109 1.5311 0.4032 0.0101 . r

0.4132 1,451.477
9 1,451.477
9 0.0367 1,452.394
9 Total 3.0634 79.5345 24.7229 0.2862 8.8794 0.2696 9.1490 2.3963 0.2575 2.6538 31,001.63 22 31,001.63
22 2.0135 31,051.96
97 CalEEMod Version: CaiEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM

3.3 Phase 1 - Grading - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total .

BIO-C02 NBI0-CO2 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust
■■
1 11
1 1.4809 0.0000 1.4809 0.1652 0.0000 0.1652 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road
I
1 2.46881

23.3845 26.1633 0.0602 1.0237 1.0237 0.9634 0.9634 5,797.878 4 5,797.878
4 1.5292 5,836.107
3 Total
1 '

2.4688 23.3845 26.1633 0.0602 1.4809 1.0237 2.5046 0.1652 0.9634 . f

1.1286 5,797.878
4 5,797.878
4 1.5292 5,836.107
3 Unmitiaate'd|Construptlon Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBiO- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category Ib/day lb/(fay
Hauling 0.8405 20.8941 6.9813 0.0978 6.2860 0.0388 6.3248 1.6103 0.0371 1.6474 10,661.66 77 10,661.66
77 0.7251 10,679.79
55 Vendor 1.0170 28.0946 11.3127 0.1622 4.1893 0.0666 4.2559 1.1477 0.0637 1.2114 17,685.36 87 17,685.36
87 1.1376 17,713.80
97 Worker 0.5021 0.3035 4.3607 0.0140 1.5202 0.0106 1.5308 0.4032 9.8000e003 0.4130 1,397.413 5 1,397.413 5 0.0331 1,398.240 7 Total 2.1595 49.2923 22.6547 0.2740 11.9955 0.1160 12.1115 3.1611 0.1108 3.2717 29,744.45 00 29,744.45
00 1.8958 29,791.84
59 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM

3.3 Phase 1 - Grading - 2023
MItiaated Cqnstruction Qh-Site
T -i
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM25
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category Ib/day IbAlay
Fugitive Dust 1.4809 0.0000 1.4809 0.1652 0.0000 0.1652 0.0000 0.0000 Otf-Road ; 2.4688 23.3845 26.1633 0.0602 1.0237 1.0237 0.9634 0.9634 0.0000 5,797.878 4 5,797.878
4 1.5292 5,836.107
3 Total 2.4688 23.3845 26.1633 0.0602 1.4809 1.0237 2.5046 0.1652 0.9634 1.1286 0.0000 5,797.878 4 5,797.878
4 1.5292 5,836.107
3 Mitlaated Constructk)n Off-S'te
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBIO-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category IbAlay ibAlay
Hauling 1 0.6405
t

20.8941
'• - 6.9813 0.0978 6.2860 0.0388 6.3248 1.6103 0.0371 1.6474 11 10,661.66 77 10,661.66 77 0.7251 10,679.79 55 Vendor « 1.0170
I
■■

28.0946 11.3127 0.1622 4.1893 0.0666 4.2559 1.1477 0.0637 1.2114 7 1 11
17,685.36
87 17,685.36
87 1.1376 17,713.80
97 Worker
t 1
■ 0.5021
I
j' •. '

0.3035 4.3607 0.0140 1.5202 0.0106 1.5308 0.4032 9.8000e- ■003

0.4130 J
1 1
1,397.413
5 1,397.413
5 0.0331 1,398.240
7,
Total 2.1595 49.2923 22.6547 0.2740 11.9955 0.1160 12.1115 3.1611 0.1106 3.2717 29,744.45 00 29,744.45
00 1.8958 29,791.84
59 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer

3.4 Phase 1 - Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Slte
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BIO-C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category Ib/day Ib/(Jay
Off-Road
■
C
■ 1.7392
11 16.2790
.

19.8969 0.0345
'

0.6992 0.6992 0.6692
.
^
■

0.6692 3,274.562
3 3,274.562 • 0.6686
3 :
• 3,291.277
: 2
•
Total 1.7392 16.2790 19.8969 0.0345 0.6992 0.6992 0.6692 0.6692 3,274.562 3 3,274.562
3 0.6686 3,291.277
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BI0-CO2 NBIO-C02 Total C02 CH4 ' N20 C02e
Category lb/jay ■ ■ Ib/(Jay
Hauling 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 O.OOCO 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor ; 0.2299 10.2737 2.3818 0.0313 0.6040 0.0112 0.6151 0.1656 0.0107 0.1763 3,414.126 2 3,414.126
2 0.2678 3,420.620
4 Worker 1 0.7384 0.4463 6.4128 0.0206 2.2355 0.0157 2.2512 0.5929 0.0144 0.6073 2,055.019 9 2,055.019
9 0.0487 2,056.236
3 Total 0.9682 10.7200 8.7946 0.0519 2.8395 0.0268 2.8663 0.7585 0.0251 0.7836 5,469.146 1 5,469.146
1 0.3164 5,477.056
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer

3.4 Phase 1 - Building Construction - 2023
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugfthre
PIWI10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Blo- 002 NBI0-CO2 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day Ib/day
Off-Road
■■■
• 1.7392
1 t

16.2790 19.8969 0.0345 • 0.6992 0.6992 0.6692 0.6692
11 0.0000 3,274.562 • 3,274.562
3 ; 3

0.6686 • 3,291.277
: 2
1 Total 1.7392 16.2790 19.8969 0.0345 0.6992 0.6992 0.6692 0.6692 0.0000 3,274.562 3 3,274.562
3 0.6686 3,291.277
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10.

Exhaust
PM10
PI^IO
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
^M2.5
PM2.5
Totai
Blo- C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e 1
Category Ib/day lb/(Jay
Hauling 1 0.0000
1 • i ' ■
o.oopo 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1 0.2299 10.2737 2.3818 0.0313 0.6040 0.0112 0.6151 0.1656 0.0107 0.1763 3,414.126 2 3,414.126
2 0.2678 3,420.820
4 Worker 1 0.7384 0.4463 6.4128 0.0206 2.2355 0.0157 2.2512 0.5929 0.0144 0.6073 2,055.019 9 2,055.019
9 0.0487 2,056.236
3 Total 0.9682 10.7200 8.7946 0.0519 2.8395 0.0268 2.8663 0.7585 0.0251 0.7836 5,469.146 1 5,469.146
1 0.3164 5,477.056
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM

3.5 Phase 2 - Demolition - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10 - Exhaust Piyiio PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust .PM2.5 PM2.5 Total BiO-C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e Category , lb/day" . lb/day
Fugitive Dust
i
. s
111i

1.2662 0.0000 1.2662 0.1917 Q.OOOO 0.1917 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road
1 ■
• 1.4744
1 •
t

13.0777 19.0275 0.0341 0.6005 0.6005 0.5627 0.5627 3,288.948 7 3,288.948
7 0.9012 3,311.479
5 Total 1.4744 13.0777 19.0275 0.0341 1.2662 0.6005 1.8667 0.1917 0.5627 0.7544 3,288.948 7 3,288.948
7 0.9012 3,311.479
5 Unmitiaated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBI0-CO2 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling ■ 0.0278
1 0.9082 0.3035 4.2500e003 0.1025 1.6900e- 003 0.1042 0.0281 1.6100e- 003 0.0297 463.4435 463.4435 0.0315 464.2315 Vendor [ 0.5085 14.0473 5.6563 0.0811 2.0946 0.0333 2.1279 0.5738 0.0319 0.6057 8,842.684 4 8,842.684
4 0.5688 8,856.904
9 Worker 1 0.1846 0.1116 1.6032 5.15006-
003

0.5589 3.91 OOe003 0.5628 0.1482 3.6000e- 003 0.1518 513.7550 513.7550 0.0122 514.0591 Total 0.7209 15.0671 7.5630 0.0805 2.7560 0.0389 2.7949 0.7502 0.0371 0.7872 9,819.882 8 9,819.882
8 0.6125 9,835.195
4 - .

CalEEMod Version: CalEEI\/lod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 44
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Date; 2/23/2022 11:34 AM

3.5 Phase 2 - Demolition - 2023
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exiiaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day ib/(Jay
Fugitive Dust 1.2662 0.0000 1.2662 0.1917 0.0000 0.1917 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4744 13.0777 19.0275 0.0341 0.6005 0.6005 0.5627 0.5627 0.0000 3,288.948 7 3,288.948
7 0.9012 3,311.479
5 Total 1.4744 13.0777 19.0275 0.0341 1.2662 0.6005 1.8667 0.1917 0.5627 0.7544 0.0000 3,288.948 7 3,288.948
7 0.9012 3,311.479
5 Mitigated Constructii)n Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5 .

Exhaust
,PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBiO-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day lb/(Jay
Hauling
Vendor

0.0278

0.5085

0.8082

14.0473

0.3035

5.6563

4.2500e003

0.0811

0.1025

2.0946

1.6900e003

0.0333

0.1042

2.1279

0.0281

0.5738

1.6100e003

0.0319

0.02970.6057
463.4435
"87842^84"
4 463.4435
T842!684'
4 0.0315
—.

0.5688
464.2315
''8,856".9d4"
9 Worker 0.1846 0.1116 1.6032 5.1500e003 0.5589 3.91 OOe- 003 0.5628 0.1482 3.6000e- 003 0.1518 513.7550 513.7550 0.0122 514.0591 Total 0.7209 15.0671 7.5630 0.0905 2.7560 0.0389 2.7949 0.7502 0.0371 0.7872 9,819.882 8 9,819.882
8 0.6125 9,835.195
4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM

3.6 Phase 2 - Excavation - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer ROG
.('w- „ ■- r.V;
NOx
■■ i
CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
TotalFugitive ■ PM2.5 . Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-C02 NBiO-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e Category lb/day •
, . tb/(lay
Fugitive Dust
■■

0.1246 0.0000 0.1246 0.0189 0.0000 0.0189 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road
■■
• 2.4688 23.3845 26.1633 0.0602 1.0237 1.0237 0.9634 0.9634 5,797.878 4 5,797.878
4 1.5292 5,836.107
3 Total 2.4688 23.3845 26.1633 0.0602 0.1246 1.0237 1.1483 0.0189 0.9634 0.9822 5,797.878 4 5,797.878
4 1.5292 5,836.107
3 Unmltiaated Constructlon Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category Ib/(lay lb/(lay
Hauling •
■■

0.6533 21.3139 7.1216 0.0997 4.2270 0.0396 4.2665 1.1062 0.0378 1.1441 10,875.85 07 10,875.85
07 0.7397 10,894.34
27 Vendor • 1.0170 26.0946 11.3127 0.1622 7.3624 0.0666 7.4290 1.9265 0.0637 1.9902 17,685.36 87 17,685.36
87 1.1376 17,713.80
97 Worker ■
■■
■

0.5021 0.3035 4.3607 0.0140 2.8417 0.0106 2.8524 0.7275 9.8000e003 0.7373 1,397.413 5 1,397.413 5 0.0331 1,398.240 7 Total 2.1724 49.7120 22.7949 0.2759 14.4310 0.1168 14.5478 3.7603 0.1114 3.8717 29,958.63 30 29,958.63
30 1.9104 30,0qQ.39
31 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM

3.6 Phase 2 - Excavation - 2023
Mitigated Construction Qn-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category ib/day (b/day
Fugitive Dust ■
•

0.1246 0.0000 0.1246 0.0189 0.0000 0.0189 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road ■
■■■
; 2.4688 23.3845 26.1633 0.0602 1.0237 1.0237 0.9634 0.9634 0.0000 5,797.878 4 5,797.878
4 1.5292 5,836.107
3 Total 2.4688 23.3845 26.1633 0.0602 0.1246 1.0237 1.1483 0.0189 0.S634 0.9822 0.0000 5,797.878 4 5,797.878
4 1.5292 5,836.107
3 Mitigated Co
i
" "f
nstructic
l .„
3n Off-Site
. 1
■ .1'
1 V
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BiO-C02 NBIO- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day ib/day
Hauling ■
■■

0.6533 21.3139 7.1216 0.0997 4.2270 0.0396 4.2665 1.1062 0.0378 1.1441 10,875.85 07 10,875.85
07 0.7397 10,894.34
27 Vendor ■
m
■
a

1.0170 28.0946 11.3127 0.1622 7.3624 0.0666 7.4290 1.9265 0.0637 1.9902 17,685.36 87 17,685.36
87 1.1376 17.713.80
97 Worker •
aa

0.5021 0.3035 4.3607 0.0140 2.8417 0.0106 2.8524 0.7275 9.8000e003 0.7373 ; 1,397.413 5 1,397.413 5 0.0331 1,398.240 7 Total 2.1724 49.7120 22.7949 0.2759 14.4310 0.1168 14.5478 3.7603 0.1114 3.8717 29,958.63 30 29,958.63
30 1.9104 30,008.39
31 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMGd.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer

3.7 Phase 2 - Garage Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
■ 'ii !
If . , , I
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Extiaust
PM10
PH410
Total
Fugitive
PIV12.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBio- C02 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day Ib/(lay
Off-Road
■■■
• 1.7392
•
1 1

16.2790 19.8969 0.0345 0.6992 0.6992 0.6692 0.6692 3,274.562 3 3,274.562
3 0.6686 • 3,291.277
: 2
t
Total 1.7392 16.2790 19.8889 0.0345 0.6992 0.6992 0.6692 0.6692 3,274.562 3 3,274.562
3 0.6686 3,291.277
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PH410
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive .

Pli/12.5
Exhaust'
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- 002 NBI0-CO2 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/Say lb/<lay
Hauling 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 VendorWorker
; 0.2299
1 0.7384

10.2737

0.4463

2.3818

6.4128

0.0313

0.0206

1.0601

4.1790

0.0112

0.0157

1.0713

4.1947

0.2776

1.0699
"""(i.oio?"^

0.0144

0.2883

1.0843
3,414.126
2 2,055.019
9 3,414.126
2 2,055.019
9 0.2678

0.0487

3.420.i2V
4 2,056.236
3 Total 0.9682 10.7200 8.7946 0.0519 5.2391 0.0268 5.2660 1.3475 ^.0251 1.3726 5,469.146 1 5,469.146
1 0.3164 5,477.056
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer

3.7 Phase 2 - Garage Construction - 2023
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugftive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
, PM10
Total
Fugitive
.PM2.5
Exhaust
,PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- 002 NBI0-CO2 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day lb/(lay
Otf-Road
■
; 1.7392
11 16.2790 19.8969 0.0345 0.6992 0.6992 0.6692
.

0.6692
1 :

0.0000 3,274.562
3 3,274.562
3 0.6686 3,291.277
2 Total 1.7392 16.2790 19.8969 0.0345 0.6992 0.6992 0.6692 0.6692 0.0000 3,274.562 3 3,274.562
3 0.6686 3,291.277
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive'
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-002 NBio-C02 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/lay'. IbAlay
Hauling j
■■

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor ■
BB

0.2299 10.2737 2.3818 0.0313 1.0601 0.0112 1.0713 0.2776 0.0107 0.2883 3,414.126 2 3,414.126
2 0.2678 3,420.820
4 Worker ■
■
B

0.7384 0.4463 6.4128 0.0206 4.1790 0.0157 4.1947 1.0699 0.0144 1.0843 2,055.019 9 2,055.019
9 0.0487 2,056.236
3 Total 0.9682 10.7200 8.7946 0.0519 5.2391 0.0268 5.2660 1.3475 0.0251 1.3726 5,469.146 1 5,469.146
1 0.3164 5,477.056
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 44
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer

3.8 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive'
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BIO- 002 NBio- 002 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day lb/(lay
Off-Road ■
■■■

1.9267 16.7947 19.9588 0.0347 0.7783 0.7783 0.7485 0.7485 3,280.139 • 3,280.139 • 0.5809 11 ' 1 1 1 '1
I •
3,294.661
8 Total 1.9267 16.7947 19.9588 0.0347 0.7783 0.7783 0.7485 0.7485 3,280.139 1 3,280.139
1 0.5809 3,294.661
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PIWI10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category Tb/day Ib/(lay
Hauling j 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ■
Vendor
a

0.0979 3.4287 0 9937 0.0121 0.3199 3.9300e003 0.3239 0.0921 ""ii^iooe-'' 003 0.0959 T3()o7i82' 3 Tsoo^si' 3 "Torts"' i,30l".96"8' 8 Worker •
aa
m

2.3997 1.4505 20.8417 0.0670 7.2655 0.0509 7.3163 1.9268 0.0468 1.9737 6,678.814 5 6,678.814
5 0.1581 6,682.768
0 Total 2.4976 4.8792 21.8354 0,0791 7.5854 0.0548 7.6402 2.0189 0.0508 2.0695 7,978.996 9 7,978.996
9 0.2296 7,984.736
8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEI\/Iod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer

3.8 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction - 2023
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exfiaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- 002 NBIo- 002 Total 002 CH4 N20 0026
Category Ib/day [s , ib/day i.. ; ■ •
Off-Road
■■■
■ 1.9267
1 1
■

16.7947
.

19.9588 0.0347 0.7783 0.7783 0.7485 0.7485 0.0000 3.280.139 1 3,280.139
1 0.5809 3,294.661
8 Total 1.9267 16.7947 19.9588 0.0347 0.7783 0.7783 0.7485 0.7485 0.0000 3,260.139 1 3,260.139
1 0.5809 3,294.661
8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PIV12.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category ib/day lb/<Jay
Hauling
Vendor
; 0.0000

0.0979

0.0000

3.4287

0.0000

0.9937

0.0000

0.0121

0.0000

0.3199

0.0000

3.9300e003

0.0000

0.3239

0.0000

0.0921

0.0000

3.7500e003

0.0000

0.0959

0.0000
1,300.182
3 0.0000
1,300.182
3 0.00000.0715

0.0000
1,301.968
8 Worker 2.3997 1.4505 20.8417 0.0670 7.2655 0.0509 7.3163 1.9268 0.0468 1.9737 6,678.814 5 6,678.814
5 0.1581 6,682.768
0 Total 2.4976 4.8792 21.8354 0.0791 7.5854 0.0548 7.6402 2.0189 0.0506 2.0695 7,978.996 9 7,978.996
9 0.2296 7,984,736
8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer

3.8 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust '
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust,'
' PM2.5
, PM2.5
Total ,
Bio-C02 NBIO-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day . ' ' Ib/(lay '
Off-Road
■■■
• 1.8081•
t
1 15.7368 19.8656 0.0347 0.6825 0.6825 0.6559 0.6559 3,280.316 • 3,280.316 4 I 4

0.5750 3,294.690
1 Total 1.8081 15.7368 19.8656 0.0347 0.6825 0.6825 0.6559 0.6559 3,280.316 4 3,280.316
4 0.5750 3,294.680
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category '' lb/jay lb/<Jay
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' Vendor 0.0958 3.4197 0.9655 0.0121 0.3199 3.6800e003 0.3238 0.0921 3.71 OOe- 003 0.0958 1,295.415 3 1,295.415 3 0.0704 1,297.175 7Worker 2.2712 1.3218 19.4602 0.0648 7.2655 0.0502 7.3157 1.9268 0.0462 1.9730 6,458.758 2 6,458.758
2 0.1449 6,462.381
6 Total 2.3670 4.7415 20.4256 0.0769 7.5854 0.0541 7.6395 2.0189 0.0499 2.0888 7,754.173 5 7,754.173
5 0.2154 7,759.557
3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer

3.8 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction - 2024
Mitigated Construction On-Slte
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- 002 NBiO- 002 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
Category Ib/day i " V ib/day
Ofl-Road
■
■
■ 1.8081
11 15.7368 19.8656 0.0347 0.6825 0.6825 0.6559 0.6559
11 0.0000 3,280.316 • 3,280.316
A ' A 4 1 4
•

0.5750 3,294.690
1 Total 1.8031 15.7368 19.8656 0.0347 0.6825 0.6825 0.6559 0.6559 0.0000 3,280.316 4 3,280.316
4 0.5750 3,294.690
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BI0-CO2 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category ib/day Ib/<lay
Hauling ■
•
■

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor ■
•
■■

0.0958 3.4197 0.9655 0.0121 0.3199 3.6800e003 0.3238 0.0921 3.71 OOe- 003 0.0958 1,295.415 3 1,295.415 3 0.0704 1,297.175 7 Worker ■ 2.2712 1.3218 19.4602 0.0648 7.2655 0.0502 7.3157 1.9268 0.0462 1.9730 6,458.758 2 6,458.758
2 0.1449 6,462.381
6 Total 2.3670 4.7415 20.4256 0.0769 7.5854 0.0541 7.6395 2.0189 0.0499 2.0688 7,754.173 5 7,754.173
5 0.2154 7,759.557
3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer

3.8 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Slte
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exiiaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- 002 NB!o-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day ib/day
Off-Road
■■■
• 1.6959••
t

14.7150 19.7838 0.0347 0.5920 0.5920 0.5684 0.5684 1
11 3,280.625
5 3,280.625 1 0.5687
c •
O i
1 3,294.841
7 Total 1.6959 14.7150 19.7838 0.0347 0.5920 0.5920 0.5684 0.5684 3,280.625 5 3,280.625
5 0.5687 3,294.841
7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive'
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BicFC02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e /
Category lb/lay Ib/(jay
Hauling I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1 0.0934 3.3899 0.9409 0.0120 0.3199 3.8200e003 0.3238 0.0921 3.6600e- 003 0.0958 1,288.220 8 1,288.220 8 0.0694 '^1.2i9'.95V 5 Worker 1 2.1573 1.2089 18.0882 0.0622 7.2655 0.0492 7.3147 1.9268 0.0453 1.9721 6,204.623 8 6,204.623
8 0.1321 6,207*927'
3 Total 2.2507 4.5986 19.0291 0.0742 7.5854 0.0530 7.6385 2.0189 0.0480 2.0679 7,492.844 7 7,492.844
7 0.2015 7,497.862
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer

3.8 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction - 2025
Mitigated Construction On-Site
li ! • . 1
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive'
PM10
Exfiaust
P1VI10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PIV12.5
Exhaust
P1^2.5
PM2.5
Total
BIO- 002 NBIO-C02 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
Category !b/(lay lb/day
Off-Road
■■
1 1.6959 14.7150 19.7838 0.0347 0.5920 0.5920 0.5684 0.5684 0.0000 3,280.625 5 3,280.625
5 0.5687 3,294.841
7 Total 1.6959 14.7150 19.7838 0.0347 0.5920 0.5920 0.5684 0.5684 0.0000 3,280.625 5 3,280.625
5 0.5687 3,294.841
7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PIVI10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category Ib/day lb/{lay
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0934 3.3899 0.9409 0.0120 0.3199 3.8200e003 0.3238 0.0921 3.6600e- • 003 0.0958 1,288.220 8 1,288.220 8 0.0694 1,289.955 5Worker 2.1573 1.2089 18.0882 0.0622 7.2655 0.0492 7.3147 1.9268 0.0453 1.9721 6,204.623 8 6,204.623
8 0.1321 6,207.927
3 Total 2.2507 4.5988 19.0291 0.0742 7.5854 0.0530 7.6385 2.0189 0.0490 2.0679 7,492.844 7 7,492.844
7 0.2015 7,497.882
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM

3.9 Architectural Coating - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PIW10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day ib/day
Archit. Coating ■ 15.6667 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1 0.3758 2.8114 4.7093 7.6200e003 0.1119 0.1119 0.1112 0.1112 725.5160 725.5160 0.0833 727.5984 Total 16.0425 2.8114 4.7093 7.6200e003 0.1119 0.1119 0.1112 0.1112 725.5160 725.5160 0.0833 727.5984 ! ■ i
Unmitiaated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10 .

Exhaust
PIVHO
PM10
Total
Fugitive
Piyi2.s
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day Ib/day
Hauling 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1 0.0374 1.3560 0.3764 4.8000e003 0.1280 1.5300e- 003 0.1295 0.0368 1.4600e- 003 0.0383 515.2883 515.2883 0.0278 515.9822Worker 1 0.9957 0.5580 8.3484 0.0287 3.3533 0.0227 3.3760 0.8893 0.0209 0.9102 2,863.672 5 2,863.672
5 0.0610 2,865.197
2 Total 1.0330 1.9139 8.7248 0.0335 3.4813 0.0243 3.5055 0.9262 0.0224 0.9485 3,378.960 9 3,378.960
9 0.0887 3,381.179
4 CalEEModtVersion: .CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer

3.9 Architectural cCatin^ -'2025
Mitigated Construction On-Slte
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2:5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day Ib/day
Archit. Coating
Off-Road
1 15.6667
; 0.3758 2.8114 4.7093 7.6200e003

0.0000

0.1119

0.0000

0.1119

0.0000

0.1112

0.0000

0.1112 ; 0.0000 725.5159

0.0000
725.5159 0.0833

0.0000
727.5984
Total 16.0425 2.8114 4.7093 7.6200e003 0.1119 0.1119 0.1112 0.1112 0.0000 725.5159 725.5159 0.0833 727.5984 Mitigated Constructi(jn Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bi0-CO2 NBiO-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category Ib/day IbAlay
. , „
Hauling
Vendor
• 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Tisleii"

0.0000
"515!2883

0.0000
~"a0278~'

0.0000
1 0.0374 1.3560 0.3764 4.8000e- 5i5.98'22"
003

0.1280 1.5300e003 0.1295 0.0368 1.4600e- 003 0.0383
Worker ; 0.9957 0.5580 8.3484 0.0287 3.3533 0.0227 3.3760 0.8893 0.0209 0.9102 2,863.672 5 2,863.672
5 0.0610 2,865.197
2 Total 1.0330 1.9139 8.7248 0.0335 3.4813 0.0243 3.5055 0.9262 0.0224 0.9485 3,378.980 9 3,378.960
9 0.0887 3,381.179
4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM

3.10 Paving -2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive'
PM2.5 .

Exhaust
PM2.5 .

PM2.5
Totai
BiO-C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category
^ t,
' ' '
lb/day ib/(jay
Off-Road ■
I
1 ; 0.6565
1 t

6.0192 7.2702 0.0108 0.3455 0.3455 0.3190 0.3190 1,026.240 8 1,026.240
8 0.3208 1,034.261
1 Paving
i
• 1
• 0.0000
1i ^ • • . !
, .

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.6565 6.0192 7.2702 0.0108 0.3455 0.3455 0.3190 0.3190 1,026.240 8 1,026.240
8 0.3208 1,034.261
1 Unmitiaated Constructlon Ofif-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day lb/(lay
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0374 1.3560 0.3764 4.8000e003 0.1280 1.5300e- 003 0.1295 0.0368 1.4600e- 003 0.0383 515.2883 515.2883 0.0278 515.9822Worker 0.1659 0.0930 1.3914 4.7900e003 0.5589 3.7900e- 003 0.5627 0.1482 3.4800e- 003 0.1517 477.2788 477.2788 0.0102 477.5329 Total 0.2033 1.4489 1.7678 9.5800e003 0.6869 5.3200e- 003 0.6922 0.1851 4.94C0e- 003 0.1900 992.5671 992.5671 0.0379 993.5151 t v«, . >V^»
CalEEModjyersjon: pal EEMpcl.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 44
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM j

3.10 Paving - 2025
Mitigated Construction On-Slte
ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBI0-CO2 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1 0.6565 6.0192 7.2702 0.0108 0.3455 0.3455 0.3190 0.3190 0.0000 1,026.240 8 1,026.240
8 0.3208 1,034.261
1 Paving 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.6565 6.0192 7.2702 0.0108 0.3455 0.3455 0.3190 0.3190 0.0000 1,026.240 8 1,026.240
8 0.3208 1,034.261
1 Mitigated Constructi(in Off-Site
, : !
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PNfllO
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PIW2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category
K'l 1 . ■ .'. '-J .
ib/jay ib/day
Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor j 0.0374 1.3560 0.3764 4.8000e003 0.1280 1.5300e- 003 0.1295 0.0368 1.4600e- 003 0.0383 515.2883 515.2883 0.0278 515.9822Worker j 0.1659 0.0930 1.3914 4.7900e003 0.5589 3.7900e- 003 0.5627 0.1482 3.4800e- 003 0.1517 477.2788 477.2788 0.0102 477.5329 Total 0.2033 1.4489 1.7678 9.5900e003 0.6869 5.320Qe- 003 0.6922 0.1851 4.9400e- 003 0.1900 992.5671 992.5671 0.0379 993.5151

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
Increase DensityIncrease Diversity
Improve Walkability Design
Increase Transit Accessibility
Improve Pedestrian Network
Provide Traffic Calming Measures
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- 002 NBIO-C02 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day IbAJay
Mitigated
Unmitigated
; 4.5119 1 19.7457
I 1
1 ______
' _______ 1" "4.805" T "2172175"

39.7082
" 47!5839 "

0.1543
""0.1912""

13.3757
""l7!047i"

0.1126
""0.T37V"

13.4883
'"i77i842 "

3.5775
""4.5595""

0.1045
"0.1273""

3.6820
"leief "
15,789.70 • 15,789.70
67 ; 67
l"9.556.97T1*9,556.97^
64 ; 64

0.7333
"o.ifiV"
■ — — — — — - 15,808.03 92
i9*,57"877"7*
24 4.2 Trip Summary Information
If; ,'; ■ '
*1 ■ '
CalEEMod Version; CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 44
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated '
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 • 111
Health Club 367.80 233.19
963.70
iribeTgi"
89^53
298.65 : 724,383 568,374
Hotel 961.40 700.35 • 2,205,862 1,730,788
Quality Restaurant 2,103.55 1687.55 ; 2,931,094 ; 2,299,828 Strip Mall 943.24 434.65 ; 1,643,138 ; 1,289,258
Total 4,375.99 4,298.34 3,121.21 1 7,504,477 5,888,247

4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-OorC-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C 1 H-Oor C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 } 0.00 0 0 0 Health Club ; 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.90 • 64.10 1
• 1

19.00 52 39 9
Hotel ; 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 } 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant J 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 ; 69.00 i 19.00 38 18 44 Strip'Mall ; 1*6.60 8.40 6.90 16.60 64.40 ; 19.00 45 40 15

4.4 Fleet Mix
■ ^liariillse.'^ i '' L^ | LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 1 LHD2 : MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS • • MH Enclosed Parking with Elevator ; 0.554129
•

0.042164 0.205182 0.113554 0.0138481 0.005806 0.021992 0.033191 0.002140 0.001609 0.004858 0.000715 0.000811 Health Club ; 0.554129 0.042164 0.205182 0.113554 0.0138481 0.005806 1 0.021992 0.033191 0.002140 0.001609 0.004858 0.000715 0.000811 Hotel ; 0.554129
m

0.042164 0.205182 0.113554 0.0138481 0.005806 0.021992 0.033191 0.002140 0.001609 0.004858 0.000715 0.000811 Quality Restaurant ; 0.554129
•

0.042164 0.205182 0.113554 o.oi3848j' aoossbe 0.021992 0.033191 0.002140 0.001609 0.004858 0.000715 0.000811 Strip Mall ; 0.554129 0.042164 ; 0.205182 0.113554, 0.013848; 0.005806 0.021992; 0.033191 0.002140 0.001609; 0.004858 0.000715, 0.000811

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Exceed Title 24
Install High Efficiency Lighting
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2:5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BIO-C02 NBIo- 002 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
Category Ib/day lt)/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
; 0.2870 2.6089 2.1915 0.0157 0.1983 0.1983 0.1983 0.1983 3,130.723 • 3,130.723 8 ! 8

0.0600 0.0574 3,149.328
1 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
; 0.2870 2.6089 2.1915 0.0157 0.1983 0.1983 0.1983 0.1983 11 3,130.723 ■ 3,130.723
8 : 8

0.0600 0.0574 3,149.328
1 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
sUse
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BIO-C02 NBlo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/jay ib/cjay
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 ■ 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Health Club 1824.03 ; 0.0197 0.1788 0.1502 1.0700e003 0.0136 0.0136 0.0136 0.0136 214.5922 214.5922 4.ll00e- 003 3.9300e- 003 215.8674 Hotel 8809.99 . 0.0950 0.8637 0.7255 5.1800e003 0.0656 0.0656 0.0656 0.0656 1,036.469 3 1,036.469 3 0.0199 0.0190 1,042.628 5 Quality
Restaurant
15864.9 ; 0.1711 1.5554 1.3065 9.3300e003 0.1182 0.1182 0.1182 0.1182 1,866.459 8 1,866.459 8 0.0358 0.0342 1,877.551 2 Strip Mall 11?.221 ■ 1.2100e-
; 003 ■

0.0110 9.2400e003 7.0000e- 005 8.4000e- 004 8.4000e- 004 ! 8.4000e- 004 8.4000e- 004 13.2025 13.2025 2.5000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 13.2809 Total 0.2870 2.6089 2.1915 0.0157 0.1983 0.1983 0.1983 0.1983 3,130.723 8 3,130.723
8 0.0600 0.0574 3,149.328
1 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer

5.2 Energy by Lan<d Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NO* CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust':

PM10
, RM10,/
'Total
FugitivePM2.5 •' Exhaust ' PM2.5 PM2.5 ' Total ;Bio-C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e Land Use kBTU/yr ib/day
■ 1 ' ■ ■
Ib/(lay
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Health Club 1.82403 ; 0.0197 0.1788 0.1502 1.0700e003 0.0136 0.0136 0.0136 0.0136 214.5922 214.5922 4.1100e- 003 3.9300e- 003 215.8674 Hotel 8.80999 ; 0.0950 0.8637 0.7255 5.1800e003 0.0656 0.0656 0.0656 0.0656 1,036.469 3 1,036.469 3 0.0199 0.0190 1,042.628 5 Quality
Restaurant

15.8649 • 0.1711 1.5554 1.3065 9.3300e003 0.1182 0.1182 0.1182 0.1182 1,866.459 8 1,866.459 8 0.0358 0.0342 1,877.551 2 Strip Mall 0.112221 ■ 1.2100e-
; 003

0.0110 9.2400e003 7.0000e- 005 8.4000e- 004 8.4000e- 004 8.4000e- 004 8.4000e- ' 004 13.2025 13.2025 2.5000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 13.2809 Total 0.2870 2.6089 2.1915 0.0157 0.1983 0.1983 0.1983 0.1983 3,130.723 8 3,130.723
8 0.0800 0.0574 3,149.328
1 6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMocl.2016.3.2 Page 42 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-002 NBIO-C02 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day lb/<jay
Mitigated
Unmitigated
1 4.9702
; 4.9702

3.5000e0043.5000e004

0.03870.0387

0.0000

0.0000

1.4000e004

1.4000e004

1.4000e004

1.4000e004

1.4000e004

1.4000e004

1.4000e004

1.4000e004

0.08310.0831

0.0831

0.0831

2.2000e0042.2000e004

0.0885

0.0885

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive •
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-002 NBIo- 002 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
SutrCategory lb/day Ib/(jay
Architectural
Coating
1 0.5666 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
; 4.4000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping • 3.5600e-
; 003

3.5000e004 0.0387 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0831 0.0831 2.2000e- 004 0.0885 Total 4.9702 3.5000e004 0.0387 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0831 0.0831 2.2000e- 004 0.0885 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 43 of 44
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Date: 2/23/202211:34 AM

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-002 NBio- 002 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
SubCategory lb/Jay ib/(Jay
Architectural •
Coating I
•

0.5666 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer «
Products !

4.4000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping ■
a

3.5600e003 3.5000e- 004 0.0387 0.0000 1.40008- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.40008- 004 0.0831 0.0831 2.2000e- 004 0.0885 Total 4.9702 3.5000e004 0.0387 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0831 0.0831 2.2000e- 004 0.0885

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Apply Water Conservation Strategy

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type 1 Number Hours/Day Days/Year 1 Horse Power Load Factor |FuelType | CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:34 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Summer

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
EquipmsntType | Number | Hours/Day | Hoursrrear | Horse Power | Load Factor | Fuel Type | Boilers
EquipmentType | Number | Heat Input/Day | Heat Input/Year | Boiler Rating | FuelType User Defined Equipment

11.0 Vegetation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM

1.0 Project Characteristics
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations
South Coast Air Basin, Winter

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric 1 Lot Acreage 1 Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 178.00 Space 1
1 1.60 71,200.00 0
Health Club 36.78 lOOOsqft 1
1 0.84 36,783.00 0
Hotel 115.00 Room 1
1 3.83 134,097.00 0
Quality Restaurant 25.09 lOOOsqft 1
1 0.58 25,094.00 0
Strip Mali 24.98 lOOOsqft 1t 0.57 24,976.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
11 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31
Operational Year 2026
Utility Company Southern California Edison
C02 Intensity
(Ib/MWhr)
364 CH4 Intensity
(Ib/MWhr)

0.029 N20 Intensity
(Ib/MWhr)

0.006

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Land Use - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Construction Phase - Construction phases consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to individualConstruction Phase Lengths." Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Off-road Equipment t Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Off-road Equipment - Consistent with the DEIR's model, however, see SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Off-Road Construction Equipment Unit Amounts and Usage Hours."
Trips and VMT - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Reductions of Hauling Trip Numbers." Demolition - See SWAPE comment on "Failure to Model Required Amount of Demolition." Grading - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Vehicle Trips - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Energy Use - See SWAPE comment on "Overestimated Reduction to Energy Use Value." Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Energy Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Water Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Waste Mitigation - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Table Name 1 Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 22.00
tbIConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 32.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 230.00 109.00
tbIConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 23.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1—■—1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1 ISO jgj w 1oS
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1 L1

82.00 tbIConstructionPhase NumDays 49.00tbIConstructionPhase NumDays 230.00 544.00tbIConstructionPhase NumDays 1 11 11 11 11 11 1 111 11 11 11 11 1 iplgs 1 oO X■ a8| jooj1 11 11 11 11 11 1till1 t11 1I 111 11 t1 1■ 1f 132.00
tbIConstructionPhase NumDays 66.00
tbIGrading AcresOfGrading 41.00
'tbIGrading ■ ' MaterialExported 34,564.00
tbIGrading MaterialExported 90,356.00
/tbILandUse
1 • ■ ... , • • 1 i:-, . 'l;,
LandUseSquareFeet 36,780.00
^2^980.00
24f00

1.00 36,783.00
tbILandUse LandUseSquareFeet 134,097.00tbILandUse LandUseSquareFeet 25,094.00tbILandUse LandUseSquareFeet 24,976.00 tbIOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 203.00tbIOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.36tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00 tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00
tbIOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00
•

2.00 1 |!
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 44
Cheval Bland - Construction and Operatldis - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM
tbIOff Road Equipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount •
•

1.00 ; 0.00
tbIOffRoadEquipment 1 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount •■ 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment ; OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount ■■
■
l.'OO 0.00
tbIOffRoadEquipment ; OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount •• 1.00 0.00 tbIOffRoadEquipment 1 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount ■■ 2.00 0.00 tbIOffRoadEquipment 1 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount •a 2.00 1.00tbIOffRoadEquipment ; OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount aa a

2.00 1.00
tbIOff Road Equipment 1 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount aa
a

2.00 0.00
tbIOffRoadEquipment ; OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount aa 2.00 1.00 tbIOffRoadEquipment ; OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount a
a

2.00 0.00
tbIOffRoadEquipment ;; OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount aa 1.00 0.00 tbIOffRoadEquipment 1 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount aa 1.00 0.00 tbIOffRoadEquipment 1 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount aa
a

3.00 2.00
tbIOffRoadEquipment ; OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount a
aa

3.00 2.00
tbIOffRoadEq uipment ; OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount a
aa

3.00 1.00
tbIOffRoadEq uipment 1 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount a
a
a

3.00 2.00
tbIOffRoadEq uipment 1 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount a
a

3.00 2.00'
tbIOffRoadEquipment ; UsageHours aa
a

7.00 8.00
tbIOffRoadEquipment ; UsageHours a
a

7.00 8.00
tbIOffRoadEquipment ; UsageHours a
aa

7.00 8.00
tbIOffRoadEquipment 1 UsageHours a
a 7.1)0 8.00
tbIOffR oad Equipment ■ UsageHours a
a

7.00 8.00
tbIOffRoadEquipment ; UsageHours a
a
a

7.00 8.00
tbIProjectCharacteristics ; C02lntensityFactor a
a
702.44 364
tbITripsAndVMT ; VendorTripLength a
a

6.90 40.00
tbITripsAndVMT 1 VendorTripLengtfi a
aa

6.90 40.00
tbITripsAndVMT ; VendorTripLength a
a
■

6.90 ; 40.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter tbITripsAndVMT •■ VendorTripLength •■ 6.90 •I 40.00tbITripsAndVMT ■■ ■
VendorTripNumber ■
•
■

0.00 1
1 60.00
tblTripsAndVMT ■■
■
VendorT ripNumber ■■
•

0.00 1
1 120.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
VendorTripNumber •■
■

48.00 1
1 100.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■
•
■
VendorTripNumber ■■ 0.00 11 60.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
VendorTripNumber ■■
■

0.00 1
1 120.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
VendorT ripNumber ■■
•

48.00 1
1 100.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■ VendorTripNumber •■
■

48.00 1
1 50.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
•
VendorTripNurnber •■
•
c;oo 1
1 20.00
tbITripsAndVMT •
•
■
VendorT ripNumber ■■
■

0.00 1
1 20.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■ VendorVehicleClass ■■ HOT Mix 11 HHDT '' tbifripsAndVMT•, ■
•
VendorVehicIeClass ■
s
•
HDTiVMix 1
1 HHDT
tbITripsAndVMT •■
•
VendorVehicleClass ■
■
•
HDT_Mix 1
1 HHDT
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
VendorVehicleClass •
•
■
HDT_Mix 11 HHDT
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
VendorVehicleClass ■
■■
HDT_Mix 1
1 HHDT
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
VendorVehicleClass •
•
■
HDT_Mix 1
1 HHDT
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
•
WorkerTripNumber ■
••

18.00 1
1 50.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
WorkerT ripNumber •
•

25.00 1
1 136.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
WorkerTripNumber ■■
■
120.00 1
1 200.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
WorkerTripNumber ■■
•

18.00 1
1 50.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
■
WorkerT ripNumber •■
•

25.00 1
1 136.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■ WorkerT ripNumber ■• 120.00 11 200.00tbITripsAndVMT ■■ ■
WorkerT ripNumber ■■ 120.00 11 650.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■■
•
WorkerT ripNumber ■
•
• • • *

24.00 1
1 300.00
tbITripsAndVMT ■
•
■
WorkerTripNumber •■
•

10.00 1
1 50.00
tbIVehicleTrips •■
■
ST_TR ■■ 20.87 11 6.34
tbIVehicleTrips ■•
■
ST_TR m■
■

8.19 8.38
■ i:-:

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
I '.' It-., ■■■