Item E-1 Attachments 8 to 25 — Beverly Hills City Council, September 20, 2022 (part 2 of 3)

Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operalloi^sr South Coast Air Basin. Winter Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM
tbIVehicleTrips ; ST_TR 94.36
•

87.96 tbIVehicleTrips ; ST_TR 42.04 1 35.81tbIVehicleTrips i SU_TR 26.73 1 1 8.12
tbIVehicleTrips ;
•
SU_TR 5.95 1
1 6.09
tbIVehicleTrips ;
•
SU_TR 72.16 1
1 67.26
tbIVehicleTrips ;
m
SU_TR 20.43 1{ 17.40
tbIVehicleTrips ; WD_TR 32.93 1{ 10.00
tbIVehicleTrips ;
•
WD_TR aT7 1 8.36
tbIVehicleTrips ;
m
WD_TR 89.95 T 83.84
tbIVehicleTrips j WD_TR 44.32
•

37.76 2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
eoG NOx CO S02 Fugitive". (
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
El-Jiaust
' PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e,
Year lb/day
■ 'it
(b/(Jay
2022- . ;;>i; 5:805li''
2023 -■ 7.5279
• I
,'106.7926
100.6717

51.460977.4313

0.34210.4160

10.3603

17.3951

1.4287

1.8693

11.789019.2644

2.5615

4.5377
! i(.34S0

1.7717

3.91046.3094

0.0000
' 0.0000 "
36,341.23 ■ 36,341.23
55 ; 55
43,799.90 43,799.90
14 I 14

3.5987

4.4777

0.00000.0000
36,431.20
18 «,9i"tM*
45 2024 » 4.4329
■1■ 1

20.5893 38.4408 0.1072 7.5854 0.7368 8.3222 2.0189 0.7060 2.7249 0.0000 'o.booo'"
10,598.05 " 10,598.05
31 ; 31
1 0.7848 0.0000 10,617.67
25 i6,273'6V
33 2025
■■
■ 22.271011

31.6565 58.6421 0.1638 11.7535 1.1322 12.8858 3.1302 1.0752 4.2053 16,241.25 ' 16,241.25 12 ! 12
1 1.2945 0.0000
Maximum 22.2710 108.7926 77.4313 0.4160 17.3951 1.8693 19.2644 4.5377 1.7717 6.3094 0.0000 43,799.90 14 43,799.90
14 4.4777 0.0000 43,911.84
45 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10<
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust PM2.5
Total
Bi0-CO2 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Year lb/day lb/(lay
2022 5.8051 106.7926 51.4609 0.3421 10.3603 1.4287 11.7890 2.5615 j|.3490 3.9104 0.0000 36,341.23 55 36,341.23
55 3.5987 0.0000 36,431.20
18 2023 7.5279 100.6717 77.4313 0.4160 17.3951 1.8693 19.2644 4.5377 1.7717 6.3094 0.0000 43,799.90 14 43,799.90
14 4.4777 0.0000 43,911.84
45 2024 4.4329 20.5893 38.4408 0.1072 7.5854 0.7368 8.3222 2.0189 0.7060 2.7249 0.0000 10,598.05 31 10,598.05
31 0.7848 0.0000 10,617.67
25 2025 22.2710 31.6565 58.6421 0.1638 11.7535 1.1322 12.8858 3.1302 1.0752 4.2053 0.0000 16,241.25 12 16,241.25
12 1.2945 0.0000 16,273.61
33 Maximum 22.2710 108.7926 77.4313 0.4160 17.3951 1.8693 19.2644 4.5377 1.7717 6.3094 0.0000 43,799.90 14 43,799.90
14 4.4777 0.0000 43,911.84
45 ROG NOx CO 802 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-002 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ,4 . f- S rt^^ i * i
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 44
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM .

2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day Ib/day
Area 4.9702 a.soooe004 0.0387 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0831 0.0831 2.2000e- 004 0.0885 Energy 0.2870 2.6089 2.1915 0.0157 0.1983 0.1983 0.1983 0.1983 3,130.723 8 3,130.723
8 0.0600 0.0574 3,149.328
1 Mobile 4.5737 21.3488 45.8921 0.1812 17.0471 0.1380 17.1851 4.5595 0.1281 4.6876 18,540.54 34 18,540.54
34 0.8857 18,562.68
64 Total 9.8308 23.9581 48.1223 0.1969 17.0471 0.3364 17.3835 4.5595 0.3265 4.8860 21,671.35 03 21,671.35
03 0.9460 0.0574 21,712.10
30 Mitigated Operational
- ■ I '- ' - ; ■i. ' ' . .(
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PMIOl
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Ekhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BIO-C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day Ib/day
Area 4.9702 3.5000e004 0.0387 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0831 0.0831 2.2000e- 004 0.0885 Energy
Mobile

0.28704.2867

2.6089

19.7902

2.1915

38.8324

0.0157

0.1460 13.3757

0.19830.1135

0.1983

13.4891 3.5775

0.1983

0.1053

0.1983

3.6828
1 3,130.723
8 14,949.00
34 3,130.723
8 14,949.00
34 0.0600

0.7505

0.0574 3,149.328
1 i4.967"7V
67 Total
I

9.5439 22.3995 41.0626 0.1617 13.3757 0.3119 13.6876 3.5775 0.3037 3.8812 18,079.81 03 18,079.81
03 0.8108 0.0574 18,117.18
33 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PMid
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhatist!
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BIO-C02 NBIO-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Percent
Reduction

2.92 6.51 14.67 17.88 21.54 7.29 21.26 21.54 6.98 20.56 0.00 16.57 16.57 14.29 0.00 16.56

3.0 Construction Detail
Constructlbri Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Phase 1 - Demolition ; Demolition 11/1/2022 j 11/30/2022 j
5{ 22
J
2 Phase 1 - Grading ^Grading
•
12/1/2022 ; 1/15/2023
1 5
4 5
4 5
J
32 3 Phase 1 - Building Construction "Building Construction •
1/16/2023 | 6/15/2023
1 109
23 82
544
1 4 Phase 2 - Demolition ; Demolition 5/1/2023 15/31/2023 J J
5 Phase 2 - Excavation Grading
Building Construction
6/1/2023 {9/23/2023 | 5
972472023 "{11/3072023 "I "5
1 j
6 Phase 2 - Garage Construction
7 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction ;Building Construction 12/1/2023 {12/31/2025 { 5 J J J
8 Architectural Coating "Architectural Coating 7/1/2025 {12/31/2025 5{ 132 9 Paving ; Paving 10/1/2025 {12/31/2025 ; 5; 66
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0Acres of Paving: 1.6 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Resldentlal Indoor: 331,425; Non-Resldentlal Outdoor: 110,475; Striped Parking Area: 4,272 (Architectural Coating - sqft)
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type | Amount 1 Usage Hours 1 Horse Power 1 Load Factor Phase 1 - Demolition ^ i . . ^ {Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 09 b
.

0.73 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Phase 1 - Demolition ■Excavators ■
■ 1
2 8.00; 158-
1 0.38
Phase 1 - Demolition ;Paving Equipment ' 2 8.00; 132; 0.36Phase 1 - Demolition jRubber Tired Dozers « 0 8.00; 247; 0.40Phase 1 - Demolition "Rubber Tired Dozers ■ ■ 1
1 8.00 ■
1 203; 0.36
Phase 1 - Demolition ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes > 1 8.00« 1 97; 0.37
Phase 1 - Grading ^Bore/Drill Rigs • 2 8.00 >
1 221; 0.50
Phase 1 - Grading ^Cranes • 2 8.00 •
1 231; 0.29
Phase 1 - Grading ■Excavators >
■ 1
2 8.001
1 158; 0.38
Phase 1 - Grading •Graders i
■ 1
0 8.001
1 187; 0.41
Phase 1 - Grading ; Pumps i 2 8.00; 84; 0.74Phase 1 - Grading •Rubber Tired Dozers > • 1
0 8.00; 247; 0.40
Phase 1 - Grading ^Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes. > 2 ■T 8.00' 97; 0.37Phase 1 - Building Construction jAerial Lifts • 2 8.00; 63; 0.31 Phase 1 - Building Construction •Cranes ■
■ 1
1 8.00; 231; 0.29
Phase -j - Buildiyg ^Construction •Forklifts « 0 8.00' 89; 0.20Phase 1 • Building Construction ■Generator Sets , • ■ 1 ■ f
0 8.00'
1 84; 0.74
Phase 1 - Building Construction ; Pumps • 2 8.00; 84; 0.74Phase 1 - Building Construction jRough Terrain Forklifts • ■ 1
1 o'.OO'
1 100; 0.40
Phase 1 - Building Construction ■ T ractors/Loaders/Backhoes • • 1 • ■
2 8.00; 97; 0.37
Phase 1 - Building Construction •Welders • • 1 1 8.00'1 46; 1 0.45
Phase 2 - Demolition ■Concrete/Industrial Saws ■
■ 1• 1
1 8.00; 81; 0.73
Phase 2 - Demolition •Excavators • 2 8.00'
1 158; 0.38
Phase 2 - Demolition ;Paving Equipment • 2 8.00'
1 132; 0.36
Phase 2 - Demolition ■Rubber Tired Dozers • 0 8.00; 247; 0.40 Phase 2 - Demolition ; Rubber Tired Loaders • 1 8".00'
1 203; 0.36
Phase 2 - Demolition ■ T ractors/Loaders/Backhoes • 1 8.00; 97; 0.37Phase 2 - Excavation ;Bore/Drill Rigs 2; 8.00; 221; 0.50 Lit-
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Phase 2 - Excavation •Cranes ■
■
2'
t

8.00' 231-
1 0.29
Phase 2 - Excavation •Excavators « ■ 1
■ 1

8.00' 158; 0.38
Phase ^ - Excavation jGraders •
. g 1 1:... 8.001 187; 0.41
Phase 2 - Excavation ; Pumps 1
• 1
2I
1 8.00; 84; 0.74
Phase 2 - Excavation •Rubber Tired Dozers •
• 1• ■
"I 8.00' 247; 0.40
Phase 2 - Excavation •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ■
• 1 2I1 8.00 • 97; 0.37
Phase 2 - Garage Construction •Aerial Lifts • • 1
■ 1

8.00 • 63; 0.31
Phase 2 - Garage Construction jCranes [ "^1 8.001 231; 0.29 Phase 2 - Garage Construction jForklifts j o1
1 8.00 • 89; 0.20
Phase 2 - Garage Construction •Generator Sets « * 1
■ 1
"1 8.001 84; 0.74
Phase 2 - Garage Construction ; Pumps "
J

8.00; 84; 0.74
Phase 2 - Garage Construction ;Rough Terrain Forklifts ' 1\ 8.00; 100; 0.40 Phase 2 - Garage Construction jTractors/Loaders/Backhoes • 2l J

8.00; 97;
1 0.37
Phase 2 - Garage Construction ■Welders « ■ 1
■ I
1 8.001 46;
1 0.45
Phase 2 - Hotel Construction •Aerial Lifts ■ 2I
J

8.00 > 63; 0.31
Phase 2 - Hotel Construction ;Air Compressors •
■ ■

8.00 i 78; 0.48
Phase 2 - Hotel Construction •Concrete/Industrial Saws ■ • 1 J 8.00- 81; 0.73
Phase 2 - Hotel Construction jCranes | J 8.00 > 231; 0.29Phase 2 - Hotel Construction •Forklifts • • 1■ ■
2I
J 8.00; 89; 0.20
Phase 2 - Hotel Construction ; Generator Sets •
1 8.00; 84; 0.74
Phase 2 - Hotel Construction ■ Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes • ■ 1 l1 , 1 . 8.00; 97; 0.37
Phase 2 - Hotel Construction ; Welders • 8.00'
1 46; 0.45
Architectural Coating •Aerial Lifts •" ■ 1 :] 8.00'1 63; 0.31 ArchitecturaliCoating ;Air Compressors • 6.00' ■
78; 0.48
Paving •Cement and Mortar Mixers •" ■ 1
■ 1

8.00'
•
9; 0.56
Paving ■Pavers • 0] 8.00; 130; 0.42Paving ; Paving Equipment ; 1; 8.00; 132- 0.36 I. w
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Paving •Rollers ■ t 1'I 8.00; 80; 0.38Paving jTrenchers • l; 8.00; 78; 0.50 Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
i Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Phase 1 - DemolitionPhase 1 - Grading
7i 50.00
1 60.00
'i2b."o"o
J
124.00; 14.70 40.00j 20.00jLD_Mix
1 1
HHDT
hhd't
HHDT
10i 136.00 HHDT
1 4,321.00; 14.70 40.001 20.00 |LD_Mix
Phase 1 - Building ; 9j 200.00 100.00 j 0.00 \ 14.70 6.90 j 20.00 iLD.Mix "HHDT 1 j _j HHDT Phase 2 - Demolition ; 7j 50.00 60.001 135.00 J

40.001 20.00 |LD_Mix jHHDT HHDT
Phase 2 - Excavation ; 10; 136.00 120.001 11,295.00; 14.70 J [

40.ooi io.oblLb Mix IhIhot
J 1
HHDT
Phase 2 - GaragePhase 2 - Hotel
; 1 9j 200.00 100.00

50.00 J

0.00; 14.70 1 6.90 J 20.00; LD_Mix ! 1 1 HHDT
HbY_Mix
HHDT
10 j 650.00 0.00; 14.70 HHDT
___l

6.901 20.00 ;LD_Mix
Architectural Coating ; 3| 300.00 20.00 j 0.00; 14.70 6.90 j 20.00 iLD Mix iHDT Mix L : " ! - HHDT
Paving ; 4; 50.00 20.00; 0.00; 14.70; 6.90; 20.00; LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix ;HHDT

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
■ Hi. I
f i I
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2

3.2 Phase 1 - Demolition - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site

Page 13 of 44 ends

Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operatiojis - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/jay Ib/day
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road 1 1.S029 18.0105 20.1544 0.0342

1.2215 0.0000

0.8904

1.2215

0.8904

0.1850 0.0000

0.8312

0.1850

0.8312 3,294.609
2 0.0000
3,294.609
2 0.9062

0.0000
3,3i7".264"
0 Total 1.9029 18.0105 20.1544 0.0342 1.2215 0.8904 2.1119 0.1850 0.8312 1.0161 3,294.609 2 3,294.609
2 0.9082 3,317.264
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
P1VI2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

1. PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBI0-CO2 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category , v , lb/day ■ ivi; .' , Ib/(lay :' . /
Hauling 1 0.0418 1.3681 0.3395 4.l900e003 0.0984 4.0000e- 003 0.1024 0.0270 3.8300e- 003 0.0308 456.0259 456.0259 0.0338 456.8696 Vendor . • 0.7911 23.9522 6.3716 0.0839 2.0946 0.0828 2.1775 0.5738 T6792 0.6531 9,130.730 4 9,130.730
4 0.6108 9,145.999
3 Worker I 0.2169 0.1354 1.5687 5.0200e003 0.5589 4.0200e- 003 0.5629 0.1482 3.7000e- 003 0.1519 500.4894 500.4894 0.0126 500.8047 Total 1.0498 25.4556 8.2798 0.0931 2.7520 0.0908 2.8428 0.7490 0.0868 0.8358 10,087.24 57 10,087.24
57 0.6571 10,103.67
36 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 44 Date: 2/23/202211:35 AM

3.2 Phase 1 - Demolition - 2022
Mitigated Construction Qn-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Extiaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BIo- C02 NBI0-CO2 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category Ib/day 'r IbAlay -<
Fugitive Dust • 1.2215 0.0000 1.2215 0.1850 0.0000 0.1850 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road ;1 1.9029 18.0105 2ai544 0.0342 0.8904 0.8904 0.8312 0.8312 0.0000 3,294.609 2 3,294.609
2 0.9062 3,317.264
0 Total 1.9029 18.0105 20.1544 0.0342 1.2215 0.8904 2.1119 0.1850 0.8312 1.0161 0.0000 3,294.609 2 3,294.609
2 0.9062 3,317.264
0 Mitigated Constructicin Off-Site
■
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BIO-C02 NBI0-CO2 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category Ib/day lb/(Jay
Hauling • 0.0418 1.3681 0.3395 4.1900e003 0.0984 4.0000e- 003 0.1024 0.0270 3.8300e- 003 0.0308 456.0259 456.0259 0.0338 456.8696 Vendor « 0.7911 23.9522 6.3716 0.0839 2.0946 0.0828 2.1775 0.5738 0.0792 0.6531 9,130.730 4 9,130.730
4 0.6108 9,145.999
3 Worker ■
■■

0.2169 0.1354 1.5687 5.0200e003 0.5589 4.0200e- 003 0.5629 0.1482 3.7000e- 003 0.1519 i 500.4894 500.4894 0.0126 500.8047 Total 1.0498 25.4556 8.2798 0.0931 2.7520 0.0908 2.8428 0.7490 0.0868 0.8358 10,087.24 57 10,087.24
57 0.6571 10,103.67
36 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM

3.3 Phase 1 - Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2J5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 1.4809 0.0000 1.4809 0.1652 0.0000 0.1652 0.0000 0.0000 Oft-Road ; 2.6323 25.7443 26.3168 0.0601 1.1564 1.1564 1.0888 1.0888 5,793.359 9 5,793.359
9 1.5343 5,831.716
7 Total 2.6323 25.7443 26.3168 0.0801 1.4809 1.1564 2.6373 0.1652 1.0888 1.2540 5,793.359 9 5,793.359
9 1.5343 5,831.716
7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
r ■ ^ )
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category" r i ' ' lb/day .f-'. lb/{lay • • • ■,
Hauling ; 1.0007 32.7758 8.1339 0.1004 3.1699 0.0958 3.2657 0.8454 0.0917 0.9371 10,925.08 36 10,925.08
36 0.8086 10,945.29
77 Vendor ; 1.5823 47.9043 12.7433 0.1679 4.1893 0.1656 4.3549 1.1477 0.1584 1.3061 18,261.46 07 18,261.46
07 1.2215 18,291.99
87 Worker ; 0.5899 0.3682 4.2668 0.0137 1.5202. 0.0109 1.5311 0.4032 0.0101 0.4132 1,361.331 2 1,361.331
2 0.0343 1,362.188
7 Total 3.1728 81.0483 25.1440 0.2820 8.8794 0.2724 9.1517 2.3963 0.2602 2.6564 30,547.87 56 30,547.87
56 2.0644 30,599.48
SO
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM

3.3 Phase 1 - Grading - 2022
Mitigated Construction Qn-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exfiaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBIO-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Categoiy lb/day . ■ t--" ibAlay
Fugitive Dust 1.4809 0.0000 1.4809 0.1652 0.0000 0.1652 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road ; 2.6323 25.7443 26.3168 0.0601 1.1564 1.1564 1.0888 1.0888 0.0000 5,793.359 9 5,793.359
9 1.5343 5,831.716
7 Total 2.6323 25.7443 26.3168 0.0601 1.4809 1.1564 2.6373 0.1652 1.0888 1.2540 0.0000 5,793.359 9 5,793.359
9 1.5343 5,831.716
7 Mitigated Constructi(>n Off-Site
/
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category ib/(lay ib/clay
Hauling ; 1.0007 32.7758 8.1339 0.1004 3.1699 0.0958 3.2657 0.8454 0.0917 0.9371 10,925.08 36 10,925.08
36 0.8086 10,945.29
77 Vendor I 1.5823 47.9043 12.7433 0.1679 4.1893 0.1656 4.3549 1.1477 0.1584 1.3061 18,261.46 07 18,261.46
07 1.2215 18,291.99
87 Worker ; 0.5899 0.3682 4.2668 0.0137 1.5202 0.0109 1.5311 0.4032 0.0101 0.4132 1,361.331 2 1,361.331
2 0.0343 1,362.188
7 Total 3.1728 81.0483 25.1440 0.2820 8.8794 0.2724 9.1517 2.3963 0.2602 2.6564 30,547.87 56 30,547.87
56 2.0644 30,599.48
50 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM

3.3 Phase 1 - Grading - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter ROG I^JOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Totai
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PIW2.5
Totai
Bio- 002 NBio- 002 Totai 002 0H4 N20 002e
Category lb/jay Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 1.4809 0.0000 1.4809 0.1652 0.0000 0.1652 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road ; 2.4688 23.3845 26.1633 0.0602 1.0237 1.0237 0.9634 0.9634 5,797.878 4 5,797.878
4 1.5292 5,836.107
3 Total 2.4688 23.3845 26.1633 0.0602 1.4809 1.0237 2.5046 0.1652 0.9634 1.1286 5,797.878 4 5,797.878
4 1.5292 5,836.107
3 !
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
, ■ - 7 ■■ ■ ■ ■ - 7
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Totai
Fugitive
PM2.5;
Exhaust .1
, PM2.5,'
, PM2.5
Total
i i
Bio-002 NBIO-C02 Totai 002 0H4 N20 002e /
Category Ib/ijay Ib/day
Hauling ; 0.6576 21.0177 7.3037 0.0961 6.2860 0.0398 6.3259 1.6103 0.0381 1.6484 10,478.26 67 10,478.26
67 0.7472 10,496.94
75 Vendor ; 1.0320 28.5916 11.5655 0.1607 4.1893 0.0676 4.2568 1.1477 0.0646 1.2123 17.522.38 33 17,522.38
33 1.1571 17,551.31
16 Worker 1 0.5564 0.3331 3.9328 0.0131 1.5202 0.0106 1.5308 0.4032 9.8000e003 0.4130 1,310.621 9 1,310.621 9 0.0309 1,311.394 5 Total 2.2459 49.9423 22.8020 0.2699 11.9955 0.1180 12.1135 3.1611 0.1125 3.2736 29,311.27 19 29,311.27
19 1.9353 29,359.65
36 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.3 Phase 1 - Gradihg - 2023
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust'
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BiO-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e .

Category lb/day IbAJay
Fugitive Oust 1.4809 0.0000 1.4809 0.1652 0.0000 0.1652 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road ; 2.4688 23.3845 26.1633 0.0602 1.0237 1.0237 0.9634 0.9634 0.0000 5,797.878 4 5,797.878
4 1.5292 5,836.107
3 Total 2.4688 23.3845 26.1633 0.0802 1.4809 1.0237 2.5046 0.1652 0.9634 1.1286 0.0000 5,797.878 4 5,797.878
4 1.5292 5,836.107
3 Mitigated Constructu)n Off-S'te
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
Pfyno
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
Pl^2.5
Exhaust
Pl^2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBIO- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category ib/day Ib/<lay
Hauling • 0.6576
•
1 21.0177 7.3037 0.0961 6.2860 0.0398 6.3259 1.6103 0.0381 1.6484 10,478.26 67 10,478.26
67 0.7472 10,496.94
75 Vendor 1 1.0320 28.5916 11.5655 0.1607 4.1893 0.0676 4.2568 1.1477 0.0646 1.2123 17,522.38 33 17,522.38
33 1.1571 17,551.31
16 Worker • 0.5564
t

0.3331 3.9328 0.0131 1.5202 0.0106 1.5308 0.4032 9.8000e003 0.4130 1,310.621 9 1,310.621 9 0.0309 1,311.394 5 Total 1 2.2459 49.9423 22.8020 0.2699 11.9955 0.1180 12.1135 3.1611 0.1125 3.2736 29,311.27 19 29,311.27
19 1.9353 29,359.65
36 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.4 Phase 1 - Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Slte
ROG IvfOx CO S02 Fugitive
Pl\/110
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- 002 NBio- C02 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day lb/<lay
Off-Road
II
I
• 1.7392
■■
1 16.2790 19.8969 0.0345 0.6992 0.6992 0.6692 0.6692 3,274.562 i 3,274.562 3 I 3

0.6686 • 3,291.277
; 2
•
Total 1.7392 16.2790 19.8969 0.0345 0.6992 0.6992 0.6692 0.6692 3,274.562 3 3,274.562
3 0.6686 3,291.277
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PH/110
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BIO-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/jay Ib/(lay
Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1 0.2427 10.1539 2.6389 0.0301 0.6040 0.0120 0.6159 0.1656 0.0114 0.1771 3,278.305 1 3,278.305
1 0.2842 3,285.411
1 Worker j 0.8182 0.4898 5.7835 0.0193 2.2355 0.0157 2.2512 0.5929 0.0144 0.6073 1,927.385 2 1,927.385
2 0.0455 1,928.521
4 Total 1.0609 10.6437 8.4224 0.0494 2.8395 0.0276 2.8671 0.7585 0.0259 0.7843 5,205.690 2 5,205.690
2 0.3297 5,213.932
5 CalEEMod-Version: CaIEEMod.2016,3.2 Page 20 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.4 Phase 1— Building Construction - 2023
Mitigated Construction On-Slte
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PI^IO
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PIVI2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- 002 NBIo- 002 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day lb/<lay
Off-Road
■■
• 1.7392
t

16.2790 19.8969 0.0345 0.6992 0.6992 0.6692 0.6692 0.0000 3.274.562 3 3,274.562
3 0.6686 ; 3,291.277
2 Total 1.7392 16.2790 19.8989 0.0345 0.6992 0.6992 0.6692 0.6692 0.0000 3,274.562 3 3,274.562
3 0.6686 3,291.277
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
Piyiio
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
Pltfl2.S
Exhaust
PIWI2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-002 NBIo-002 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day ■ ■ ■:■■■■ ■■ ■ Ib/(lay
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor
1*

0.2427 10.1539 2.6389 0.0301 0.6040 0.0120 0.6159 0.1656 0.0114 0.1771 ; 3,278.305 1 3,278.305
1 0.2842 3,285.411
1 Worker ■
■■■

0.8182 0.4898 5.7835 0.0193 2.2355 0.0157 2.2512 0.5929 0.0144 0.6073 1,927.385 2 1,927.385
2 0.0455 1,928.521
4 Total 1.0609 10.6437 8.4224 0.0494 2.8395 0.0276 2.8671 0.7585 0.0259 0.7843 5,205.690 2 5,205.690
2 0.3297 5,213.932
5 CalEEMod Version: CaiEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM

3.5 Phase 2 - Demolition - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Qn-Site
Cheval Bianc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Extiaust
PM10
PM10
Total
• Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5 ,
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category Ib/day Ib/day
■ r,t:i
Fugitive Dust
1 1

1.2662 0.0000 1.2662 0.1917 0.0000 0.1917 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road
1 ,
< 1.4744
1i •• ^1

13.0777 19.0275 0.0341 0.6005 0.6005 0.5627 0.5627 3,288.948 7 3,288.948
7 0.9012 3,311.479
5 Total 1.4744 13.0777 19.0275 0.0341 1.2662 0.6005 1.8667 0.1917 0.5627 0.7544 3,288.948 7 3,288.948
7 0.9012 3,311.479
5 Unmitigated Constructlon Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category Ib/day IbAlay
Hauling ; 0.0286 0.9136 0.3175 4.1800e003 0.1025 1.7300e- 003 0.1043 0.0281 1.6600e- 003 0.0298 455.4714 455.4714 0.0325 456.2834 Vendor 1 0.5160 14.2958 5.7828 0.0803 2.0946 0.0338 2.1284 0.5738 0.0323 0.6062 8,761.191 7 8,761.191
7 0.5786 8,775.655
8 Worker ; 0.2046 0.1225 1.4459 4.i300e003 0.5589 3.9100e- 003 0.5628 0.1482 3.6000e- 003 0.1518 481.8463 481.8463 0.0114 482.1304 Total 0.7491 15.3318 7.5461 0.0894 2.7560 0.0394 2.7955 0.7502 0.0376 0.7877 9,698.509 3 9,698.509
3 0.6224 9,714.069
5 CalEEModl'Version: 'CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.5 Phase 2 - Demolition - 2023
Mitigated Construction On-Slte
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category ib/day ■ lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1
•

1.2662 0.0000 1.2662 0.1917 0.0000 0.1917 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road • 1.4744
aa
a

13.0777 19.0275 0.0341 0.6005 0.6005 0.5627 0.5627 0.0000 3,288.948 7 3,288.948
7 0.9012 3,311.479
5 Total 1.4744 13.0777 19.0275 0.0341 1.2662 0.6005 1.8667 0.1917 0.5627 0.7544 0.0000 3,288.948 7 3,288.948
7 0.9012 3,311.479
5 Mitiaated Constructicm Off-S te
..M t
i
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBI0-CO2 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category
i :i . .
lb/day lb/(lay
Hauling ; 0.0286 0.9136 0.3175 4.i800e003 0.1025 1.7300e- 003 0.1043 0.0281 1.6600e- 003 0.0298 455.4714 455.4714 0.0325 456.2834 Vendor ; 0.5160 14.2958 5.7828 0.0803 2.0946 0.0338 2.1284 0.5738 0.0323 0.6062 8,761.191 7 8,761.191
7 0.5786 8,775.655
8 Worker • 0.2046 0.1225 1.4459 4.8300e003 0.5589 3.91 OOe- 003 0.5628 0.1482 3.6000e- 003 0.1518 481.8463 481.8463 0.0114 482.1304 Total 0.7491 15.3318 7.5461 0.0894 2.7560 0.0394 2.7955 0.7502 0.0376 0.7877 9,698.509 3 9,698.509
3 0.6224 9,714.069
5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM

3.6 Phase 2 - Excavation - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
Pfyiio
Exhaust
PM10
PI^IO
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Piyi2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category
: ■ 'I '
, , L .
lb/day
M ■
Ib/day - 1
Fugitive Dust 0.1246 0.0000 0.1246 0.0189 0.0000 0.0189 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.4688 23.3845 26.1633 0.0602 1.0237 1.0237 0.9634 0.9634 5,797.878 4 5,797.878
4 1.5292 5,836.107
3 Total 2.4688 23.3845 26.1633 0.0602 0.1246 1.0237 1.1483 0.0189 0.9834 0.9822 5,797.878 4 5,797.878
4 1.5292 5,836.107
3 Unmltlaated Construction OfF-Slte
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive,
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BIO-C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category IbAlay lb/day
Hauling • 0.6708 21.4399 7.4505 0.0980 4.2270 0.0406 4.2676 1.1062 0.0389 1.1451 10,688.76 53 10,688.76
53 0.7623 10,707.82
15 Vendor 1 1.0320 28.5916 11.5655 0.1607 7.3624 0.0676 7.4299 1.9265 0.0646 1.9912 17,522.38 33 17,522.38
33 1.1571 17,551.31
16 Worker ; 0.5564 0.3331 3.9328 0.0131 2.8417 0.0106 2.8524 0.7275 9.8000e003 0.7373 1,310.621 9 1,310.621 9 0.0309 1,311.394 5 Total 2.2591 50.3645 22.9487 0.2718 14.4310 0.1188 14.5499 3.7603 0.1133 3.8736 29,521.77 06 29,521.77
06 1.9503 29,570.52
76 •
. I , 1 •• • ' I
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 44
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM

3.6 Phase 2 - Excavation - 2023
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PI^IO
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category Ib/day lb/lay
Fugitive Dust 0.1246 0.0000 0.1246 0.0189 0.0000 0.0189 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road ■ 2.4688 23.3845 26.1633 0.0602 1.0237 1.0237 0.9634 0.9634 0.0000 5,797.878 4 5,797.878
4 1.5292 5,836.107
3 Total 2.4688 23.3845 26.1633 0.0802 0.1246 1.0237 1.1483 0.0189 0.9634 0.9822 0.0000 5,797.878 4 5,797.878
4 1.5292 5,836.107
3 Mitigated Constructit3n Off-SIte
'■ i
ROG NOx CO 802 Fugitive'
PiyiiO
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category ib/(lay lb/<Jay
Hauling ; 0.6708 21.4339 7.4505 0.0980 4.2270 0.0406 4.2676 1.1062 0.0389 1.1451 10,688.76 53 10,688.76
53 0.7623 10,707.82
15 Vendor 1 1.0320 28.5916 11.5655 0.1607 7.3624 0.0676 7.4299 1.9265 0.0646 1.9912 17,522.38 33 17,522.38
33 1.1571 17,551.31
16 Worker 1 0.5564 0.3331 3.9328 0.0131 2.8417 0.0106 2.8524 0.7275 9.8000e003 0.7373 1,310.621 9 1,310.621 9 0.0309 1,311.394 5 Total 2.2591 50.3645 22.9487 0.2718 14.4310 0.1188 14.5499 3.7603 0.1133 3.8736 29,521.77 06 29,521.77
08 1.9503 29,570.52
76 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.7 Phase 2 - Garage Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Slte
,l 1;
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
Plirt2.5
PM2.5
Tola!
Bio- 002 NBio- 002 Total 002 0H4 N20 0O2e
Category Ib/day lb/(fay
Off-Road
■■■
• 1.7392
1 t
•

16.2790 19.8969 0.0345 0.6992 0.6992 0.6692 0.6692 3,274.562 3 3.274.562 ' 0.6686
3 !
1 ■ 3,291.277
: 2
1 Total 1.7392 16.2790 19.8969 0.0345 0.6992 0.6992 0.6692 0.6692 3,274.562 3 3,274.562
3 0.6686 3,291.277
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx 00 S02 Fugitive
Pl\/110
Exhaust
Pf410
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
Pf\42.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- 002 NBIo-002 Total 002 0H4 N20 002e
Category lb/day IbAday
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 VendorWorker

0.2427

0.8182

10.1539

0.4898

2.6389

5.7835

0.0301

0.0193

1.0601

4.1790

0.0120

0.0157

1.0720

4.1947

0.2776

1.0699

0.0114

0.0144

0.2890

1.0843
I
3,278.305
1 1,927.385
2 3,278.305
1 1,927.385
2 0.2842

0.0455
3,285.411
1 i,928'.52V
4 Total 1.0609 10.6437 8.4224 0.0494 5.2391 0.0276 5.2667 1.3475 0.0259 1.3733 5,205.690 2 5,205.690
2 0.3297 5,213.932
5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.7 Phase 2 - Garage Construction - 2023
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category tb/day ib/(lay
Off-Road •■ 1.7392 16.2790 19.8969 0.0345 0.6992 0.6992 0.6692 0.6692 0.0000 3,274.562 3 3,274.562 • 0.6686
3 :
•
• 3,291.277
: 2
1 Total 1.7392 16.2790 19.8969 0.0345 0.6992 0.6992 0.6692 0.6692 0.0000 3,274.562 3 3,274.562
3 0.6686 3,291.277
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BI0-C02 NBIO-C02'TotalC02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day IbAlay
Hauling j 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor ; 0.2427 10.1539 2.6389 0.0301 1.0601 0.0120 1.0720 0.2776 0.0114 0.2890 3,278.305 1 3,278.305
1 0.2842 3,285.411
1 Worker I 0.8182 0.4898 5.7835 0.0193 4.1790 0.0157 4.1947 1.0699 0.0144 1.0843 1,927.385 2 1,927.385
2 0.0455 1,928.521
4 Total 1.0609 10.6437 8.4224 0.0494 5.2391 0.0276 5.2667 1.3475 0.0259 1.3733 5,205.690 2 5,205.690
2 0.3297 5,213.932
5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 44
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM

3.8 Phase 2 - Hotpi :Gonstruction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total ■
Bio-002 NBio-C02 Total 002 CH4 M20 C02e
Category lb/<jay IbAjay
Off-Road
■■
1 • 1.9267
1 11

16.7947 19.9588 0.0347 0.7783 0.7783 0.7485 0.7485 3,280.139 • 3,280.139 1 : 1

0.5809 3,294.661
a
Total 1.9267 16.7947 19.9588 0.0347 0.7783 0.7783 0.7485 0.7485 3,280.139 1 3,280.139
1 0.5809 3,294.661
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- 002 NBio- 002 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
Category ib/jay ib/(jay
Hauling •
■
o.oboo 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 o.oOoo Vendor «
«
■

0.1030 3.4103 1.0856 0.0118 0.3199 4.1300e003 0.3241 0.0921 3.9400e- 003 0.0961 1,265.150 6 1,265.150 6 0.0758 1,267.045 5 Worker f
•
■
•

2.6591 1.5920 18.7963 0.0628 7.2655 0.0509 7.3163 1.9268 0.0468 1.9737 6,264.001 8 6,264.001
8 0.1477 6,267.694
5 Total 2.7621 5.0022 19.8819 0.0746 7.5854 0.0550 7.6404 2.0189 0.0508 2.0697 7,529.152 3 7,529.152
3 0.2235 7,534.740
0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.8 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction - 2023
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exiiaust
PH/110
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- 002 NBI0-CO2 Total 002 0H4 N20 0026
Category It)/day ib/(lay
Off-Road ■
■■
fl
■ 1.9267
•
11 16.7947 19.9588 0.0347 0.7783 0.7783 0.7485 0.7485 0.0000 11 3,280.139
1 3,260.139
1 0.5809 3,294,661
8 Total 1.9267 16.7947 19.9588 0.0347 0.7783 0.7783 0.7485 0.7485 0.0000 3,280.139 1 3,280.139
1 0.5809 3,294.661
8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx 00 S02 Fugitive
PkfllO
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PIM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bi0-0O2 NBio-002 Total 002 0H4 N20 002e
Category lb/jay Ib/(Jay
Hauling 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1 0.1030 3.4103 1.0856 0.0118 0.3199 4.1300e003 0.3241 0.0921 3.9400e- 003 0.0961 1,265.150 6 1,265.150 6 0.0758 1,267.045 5Worker 1 2.6591 1.5920 18.7963 0.0628 7.2655 0.0509 7.3163 1.9268 0.0468 1.9737 6,264.001 8 6,264.001
8 0.1477 6,267.694
5 Total 2.7621 5.0022 19.8819 0.0746 7.5854 0.0550 7.6404 2.0189 0.0508 2.0697 7,529.152 3 7,529.152
3 0.2235 7,534.740
0 , . , i
CalEEMpd. Version: ,CplEEiyiocl.2016.3.2
...,a ..V /.

Page 29 of 44 ends

Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM

3.8 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Slte
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Blo- C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/iay lb/(lay
Of(-Road ■ 1.8081 15.7368 19.8656 0.0347 0.6825 0.6825 0.6559 0.6559 3,280.316 4 3.280.316
4 0.5750 3,294.690
1 Total 1.8081 15.7368 19.8656 0.0347 0.6825 0.6825 0.6559 0.6559 3,280.316 4 3,280.316
4 0.5750 3,294.690
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
- Np^-. CO , S02 Fugitive".

PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
'^haiist
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Blo- C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20. , ep2S-'^
Category lb/day ib/<Jay
Hauling . o.oodo" d.oood 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 6.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 o:oooo" Vendor 0.1007 3.4023 1.0547 0.0118 0.3199 4.0600e003 0.3240 0.0921 3.8800e- 003 0.0960 1,260.760 4 1,260.760 4 0.0746 1,262.625 9Worker 2.5242 1.4503 17.5204 0.0607 7.2655 0.0502 7.3157 1.9268 0.0462 1.9730 6,056.976 3 6,056.976
3 0.1352 6,060.356
5 Total 2.6248 4.8525 18.5751 0.0725 7.5854 0.0542 7.6397 2.0189 0.0501 2.0690 7,317.736 7 7,317.736
7 0.2098 7,322.982
4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.8 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction - 2024
Mitigated Construction On-Site
I^OG . .. NQ)P. CO S02 Fugitive:

PM10
Exfiaust
PM10
PM10
Total
. Fugitive
PM2.5
^aust
PM2.5
PIW2.5
Total
Bio-002 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 lvl20. 0026'
Category
■■
Ib/day
if. " •
Ib/(lay
Off-Road
■■■
• 1.8081
999

15.7368 19.8656 0.0347
■
■

0.6825 0.6825 6.6559 0.6559 0.0000 3,280.316 • 3,280.316 • 0.5750 4A ' 1 4 A ',
1 f
3,294.690
1 Total 1.8081 15.7368 19.8656 0.0347 0.6825 0.6825 0.6559 0.6559 0.0000 3,280.316 4 3,280.316
4 0.5750 3,294.690
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PIM2.5
Exhaust
PH(12.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e '
Category Ib/day ib/(lay
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1007 3.4023 1.0547 0.0118 0.3199 4.0600e003 0.3240 0.0921 3.8800e- 003 0.0960 1,260.760 4 1,260.760 4 0.0746 1,262.625 9Worker 2.5242 1.4503 17.5204 0.0607 7.2655 0.0502 7.3157 1.9268 0.0462 1.9730 6,056.976 3 6,056.976
3 0.1352 6,060.356
5 Total 2.6248 4.8525 18.5751 0.0725 7.5854 0.0542 7.6397 2.0189 0.0501 2.0690 7,317.736 7 7,317.736
7 0.2098 7,322.982
4 V- . V N •
i''' V'-V 1
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMocl.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.8 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/(Jay Ib/(lay
Off-Road
■
1 1.6959
•

14.7150 19.7838 0.0347 0.5920 0.5920 •
111

0.5684 0.5684 • 3,280.625 • 3,280.625 • 0.5687
'
• S O ' 1 5 3 '•• 1 I
3,294.841
7 Total 1.6959 14.7150 19.7838 0.0347 0.5920 0.5920 0.5684 0.5684 3,280.625 5 3,280.625
5 0.5687 3,294.841
7 Unmitigated Construction^Off-Site f.
■ •■'•CO" S02' Fugitive"'
PfVllO
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
:^hatist
■PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N2D« •'C0"^6v
Category ib/Jay Ib/(Jay i
Hauling ■
••

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor ■
•m

0.0981 3.3727 1.0279 0.0117 0.3199 3.9800e003 0.3239 0.0921 3.81 OOe- 003 0.0959 1,253.948 3 1,253.948 3 0.0735 1,255.784 7 Worker ■ 2.4047 1.3260 16.2686 0.0583 7.2655 0.0492 7.3147 1.9268 0.0453 1.9721 5,818.645 3 5,818.645
3 0.1232 5,821.724
8 Total 2.5028 4.6987 17.2965 0.0700 7.5854 0.0532 7.6386 2.0189 0.0491 2.0681 7,072.593 6 7,072.593
6 0.1966 7,077.509
4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.8 Phase 2 - Hotel Construction - 2025
IVIitlaated Construction Qn-Site
hOG . NOxr CO S02 Fugitive •
PM10
Extiaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
^haOst
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-002 NBIo- 002 Total C02 CH4 N20' CG2e'
Category lb/day Ib/(Jay
Off-Road "
a
■
■ 1.6959
111

14.7150 19.7838 0.0347 0.5920 0.5920 0.5684 0.5684 0.0000 11 3,280.625 ■ 3,280.625
5 ! 5

0.5687 3,294.841
7 Total 1.6959 14.7150 19.7838 0.0347 0.5920 0.5920 0.5684 0.5684 0.0000 3,280.625 5 3,280.625
5 0.5687 3,294.841
7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2 5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
BI6- C02 NBIO-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day lb/(Jay
Hauling ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor ; 0.0981 3.3727 1.0279 0.0117 0.3199 3.9800e003 0.3239 0.0921 3.81 OOe- 003 0.0959 1,253.948 3 1,253.948 3 0.0735 1,255.784 7Worker i'i /' i -i
I 2.4047 1.32Q0 16.2686 0.0583 7.2655., 0.0492 7.3147 1.9268 Q.P453 4 1.9721 5,818.645
3 5,818.645
3 0.1232 5,821.724
. 8.»iTotal 2.5028 4.6987 17.2985 0.0700 7.5854 0.0532 7.6386 2.0189 0.0491 2.0681 7,072.593 6 7,072.593
6 0.1986 7,077.509
4 i >,
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM

3.9 Architectural Coating - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust '
PM2.5
' PM2.5;
Tctai'
Bid- 002 NBI0-CO2 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day lb/(jay
Archil. Coating
■
• 15.6667••

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road
•
■
; 0.3758
11 2.8114 4.7093 7.6200e003 0.1119 0.1119 0.1112 0.1112 725.5160 725.5160 0.0833 727.5984 Total 16.0425 2.8114 4.7093 7.62008-
003

0.1119 0.1119 ,0.1112 0.1112 725.5160 725.5160 0.0833 727.5984 Unmitigated'Cbhstriicfibh dff-Site '' ;
• ■ 1
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Tctai
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Tctai
Bio- 002 NBio- 002 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category Ib/day lb/<fay
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0392 1.3491 0.4112 4.6700e003 0.1280 1.5900e- 003 0.1296 0.0368 1.5200e- 003 0.0384 501.5793 501.5793 0.0294 502.3139Worker 1.1099 0.6120 7.5086 0.0269 3.3533 0.0227 3.3760 0.8893 0.0209 0.9102 1 2,685.528
6 2,685.528
6 0.0569 2,686.949
9 Total 1.1491 1.9611 7.9197 0.0316 3.4813 0.0243 3.5056 0.9262 0.0224 0.9486 3,137.107 9 3,187.107
9 0.0862 3,189.263
8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM

3.9 Architectural Coating - 2025
M itiqated' CdhstriicVi 6n' '6n-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
B[0-C02 NBio- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 1 15.6667 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1 0.3758 2.8114 4.7093 7.62000-
003

0.1119 0.1119 0.1112 0.1112 0.0000 725.5159 725.5159 0.0833 727.5984 Total 16.0425 2.8114 4.7093 7.62008-
003

0.1119 0.1119 0.1112 0.1112 0.0000 725.5159 725.5159 0.0833 727.5984 Mitiaated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category ib/day ib/day
Hauling ; 0.0000 1 0.0000
I 1

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 fl.OOOO 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 o.ooqo Vendor • 0.0392 • 1.3491
• 1
1 1
• 1

0.4112 4.6700e003 0.1280 1.5900e- 003 0.1296 0.0368 1.5200e- 003 0.0384 501.5793 501.5793 0.0294 502.3139 Worker « 1.1099 « .0.6120., 7.5086 0.0269 3.3533 0.0227 3.3760 0.8893 0,0209 0.9102 2,685.528 6 2,685.528
6 0.0569 2,686.949
■ 9-
Total 1.1491 1.8611 7.9197 0.0316 3.4813 0.0243 3.5056 0.9262 0.0224 0.9486 3,187.107 9 3,187.107
9 0.0862 3,189.263
8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 44 Date; 2/23/2022 11:35 AM

3.10 Paving - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exlraust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Off-Road
Paving
; 0.6565 6.0192 7.2702 0.0108 0.3455 0.3455 03190 0.3190 1,026.240 8 1,026.240
8 0.3208 1,034.261
1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 o.ooob"
Total
;ll •

0.6565 ,6.0192-
f3

7.2702 0.0108 0.3455 0.3455 0.3190
V0.3190 1,026.240 8 1,026.240 8 0.3208 1,034.261 1
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PI^IO
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBio-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day ib/day
Hauling j 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1 0.0392 1.3491 0.4112 4.6700e003 0.1280 1.5900e- 003 0.1296 0.0368 1.5200e- 003 0.0384 501.5793 501.5793 0.0294 502.3139Worker ; 0.1850 0.1020 1.2514 4.4900e003 0.5589 3.7900e- 003 0.5627 0.1482 3.4800e- 003 0.1517 447.5881 447.5881 9.48006- 003 447.8250 Total 0.2242 1.4511 1.6626 9.1600e003 0.6869 5.3800e- 003 0.6922 0.1851 5.0000e- 003 0.1901 949.1674 949.1674 0.0389 950.1389 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.10 Paving - 2025
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
Pltfl2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBI0-CO2 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category ■ lt>Ajay.'' ■ • , • ■ : lb/day
Off-Road 0.6565 6.0192 7.2702 0.0108 0.3455 0.3455 0.3190 0.3190 0.0000 1,026.240 8 1,026.240
8 0.3208 1,034.261
1 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.6565 6.0192 7.2702 0.0108 0.3455 0.3455 0.3190 0.3190 0.0000 1,026.240 8 1,026.240
8 0.3208 1,034.261
1 Mitiaated Construction Off-Site
ROG
• -r •
NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10 .

Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
^haust
«IVI2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 NBlO- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
■ • :

Category . ■ . ■ • lb/day lb/day
HauHng . ,
' 1
p 0.0000.,, o.oooo;. 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 s:

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 o.opoo
Vendor ■■ 0.0392
ai

1.3491 0.4112 4.6700e003 0.1280 1.5900e- 003 0.1296 0.0368 1.5200e- 003 0.0384 501.5793 501.5793 0.0294 502.3139 Worker •• 0.1850 447".825b'
■1■1

0.1020 1.2514 4.4300e003 0.5589 3.7900e- 003 0.5627 0.1482 3.4800e- 003 0.1517 447.5881 447.5881 g.4800e- 003 Total 0.2242 1.4511 1.6626 9.1600e003 0.6869 5.3800e- 003 0.6922 0.1851 5.000Qe- 003 0.1901 949.1674 949.1674 0.0389 950.1389

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
Increase DensityIncrease Diversity
Improve Walkability Design
Increase Transit Accessibility
Improve Pedestrian Network
Provide Traffic Calming Measures

Page 37 of 44 ends

Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-002 NBIO-C02 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e
Category ib/day lb/<lay
Mitigated •
Unmitigated ■
■■

4.28674.5737

19.7902

21.3488

38.8324

45.8921

0.1460

0.1812

13.3757

17.0471

0.1135 ■ 13.48910.1380 ; 17.1851

3.5775

4.5595

0.1053

0.1281

3.6828

4.6876
1 1
14,949.00
34 34
14,949.00
34 ''i'^&4a5T
34 0.7505
"aiis""
14,967.76
67 "" i8',562'6V
64 4.2 Trip Summary Information
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 44
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated. Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00
_ _ _ 0.00
233.T9
9^63!70
2,206.92
~~894!53

0.00 1•
1 ..............
367.80
...
298.65 724,383
•
568,374
Hotel 961.40
• ••
700.35 2,205,862
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm *
1,730,788
Quality Restaurant 2,103.55 1687.55 2,931,094
• • • • • •
2,299,828
Strip Mall 943.24 434.65 1,643,138 : 1,289,258
Total 4,375.99 4,298.34 3,121.21 7,504,477 5,888,247

4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip% Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-0 or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C 1 H-OorC-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 j 0.00 0 0 0 Health Club 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.90 • 64.10 1 19.00
■ 1
52 39 9
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 1 61.60 [ 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 16.60 ; 8.40 6.90 1 12.00 j 69.00 i 19.00 38 18 44 Strip Mall 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.60 64.40 ; 19.00 45 40 15

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD QBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Enclosed Parkipg with Elevator 0.554129 0.042164 0.205182 0.113554 0.013848 0.005806 , 0.021992 0.033191 0.002140 0.001609 0.004858 0.000715 0.000811 Health Club 0.554129 0.042164 0.205182 0.113554 0.013848 0.005806 0.021992 0.033191 0.002140 0.001609 0.004858 0.000715 0.000811 Hotel 0.554129 0.042164 0.205182 0.113554 0.013848 0.005806 0.021992 0.033191 0.002140 0.001609 0.004858 0.000715 0.000811 Quality Restaurant 0.554129 0.042164 0.205182 0.113554 0.013848 0.005806 0.021992 0.033191 0.002140 0.001609 0.004858 0.000715 0.000811 Strip Mall 0.554129 0.042164 0.205182 0.113554 0.013848 0.005806 0.021992 0.033191 0.002140 0.001609 0.004858 0.000715 0.000811

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Exceed Title 24
Install High Efficiency Lighting
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
ExhaustPM2.5 PM2.5 Total BIO-C02 NBIO-C02 Total 002 CH4 N20 C02e Category lb/day ib/(lay
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.2870 2.6089 2.1915 0.0157 0.1983 0.1983 0.1983 0.1983 3,130.723 1 3,130.723 8 I 8

0.0600 0.0574 3,149.328
1 NaturalGas
Unrritigated

0.2870 2.6089 2.1915 0.0157 0.1983 0.1983 0.1983 0.1983 f
11 3,130.723
8 3,130.723
8 0.0600 0.0574 3,149.328
1 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
sUse
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-002 NBI0-CQ2 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/(lay
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Health Club 1824.03 1 0.0197 0.1788 0.1502 1.0700e003 0.0136 0.0136 0.0136 0.0136 214.5922 214.5922 4.1100e- 003 3.9300e- 003 215.8674 Hotel 8809.99 1 0.0950 0.8637 0.7255 5.1800e003 0.0656 0.0656 0.0656 0.0656 ------- 1,036.469 3 1,036.469 3 0.0199 0.0190 1,042*628' 5 Quality
Restaurant
15864.9 1 0.1711 1.5554 1.3065 9.3300e003 0.1182 0.1182 0.1182 0.1182 ------- 1,866.459 8 1,866.459 8 0.0358 0.0342 "i,877'.55'l" 2 strip Mall 112.221 ■ 1.2100e-
; 003

0.0110 9.2400e003 7.0000e- 005 8.4000e- 004 8.4000e- 004 8.4000e- 004 8.4000e- 004 13.2025 13.2025 2.5000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 13.2809 Total 0.2870 2.6089 2.1915 0.0157 0.1983 0.1983 i 0.1983 0.1983 3,130.723 8 3,130.723
8 0.0600 0.0574 3,149.328
1 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMocl.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated
NaturalGa
sUse
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day ib/(lay
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
Health Club
0 1.82403
; 0.0000
; 0.0197

0.0000

0.1788

0.0000

0.1502

0.0000

1.0700e003

0.0000

0.0136

0.0000

0.0136

0.0000

0.0136

0.0000

0.0136

0.0000
214.5922

0.0000

4.1100e003

0.0000

3.9300e003

0.0000
215.8674
Hotel 8.80999 j 0.0950 0.8637 0.7255 5.1800e003 0.0656 0.0656 0.0656 0.0656 \i t
1,036.469
3 1,036.469
3 0.0199 0.0190 1,042.628
5 Quality
Restaurant

15.8649 I 0.1711 1.5554 1.3065 9.3300e003 0.1182 0.1182 0.1182 0.1182 } 1 1,866.459
8 1,866.459
8 0.0358
"ilioooe^
004

0.0342

2.4000e^
004
1,877.551
2 Strip Mall 0.112221 ■ 1.2100e- "meog *
; 003

0.0110 9.2400e003 7.0000e- 005 8.4000e- 004 8.4000e- 004 8.4000e- 004 8.4000e- 004 13.2025 13.2025 Total 0.2870 2.6089 2.1915 0.0157 0.1983 0.1983 0.1983 0.1983 3,130.723 8 3,130.723
8 O.OSOO 0.0574 3,149.328
1 6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMocl.2016.3.2 Page 42 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter ROG NOX CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5.

Total
BIO-C02 NBIO-C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
Category lb/day lb/(lay
Mitigated • 4.9702
1 3.5000e004 0.0387 0.0000 l.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0831 0.0831 2.2000e- 004 0.0885 Unmitigated ; 4.9702 3.5000e004 0.0387 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1-.40006- 004 1.4000e- 004 1 0.0831 0.0831 2.2000e004 "0.0885"

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PMIO
Exhaust
PMIO
PMIO
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBIo- C02 Total C02 CH4 N20 C02e
SubCategory lb/day lb/(lay
Architectural
Coating
Consumer
Products
Landscaping

0.5666

4.4000

0.0000

0.00000.0000

0.0000

0.0000
• 1 1 1 1 I 1 •• ••1 • 1 ~"o!o83T~

0.0000

0.0000
""oToiiT""~2.2000~'
004

0.0000
"0.006b"

3.5600e- "6.0885 "
003

3.5000e004 0.0387 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 1.40006- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.40006- 004 Total 4.9702 S.SOOOe004 0.0387 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0831 0.0831 2.2000e- 004 0.0885 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 43 of 44
Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
■ Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- C02 NBiO-C02 Total C02 CH4 • N20 C02e
SubCategory ib/day 'IbAjay ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
Architectural
Coating
I 0.5666 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
Landscaping
1 4.4000
• 3.5600e-
; 003

3.5000e004 0.0387 0.0000

0.0000

1.4000e004

0.0000

1.4000e004

0.0000

1.4000e004

0.0000

1.4000e004 0.0831

0.0000

0.0831 2.2000e004

0.00000.0885
Total 4.9702 3.S000e004 0.0387 0.0000 1.40000- 004 1.40009- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0831 0.0831 2.2000e- 004 0.0885

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Apply Water Conservation Strategy

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day DaysA'ear 1 Horse Power 1 Load Factor |Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 44 Date: 2/23/2022 11:35 AM Cheval Blanc - Construction and Operations - South Coast Air Basin, Winter

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day I HoursA'ear Horse Power I Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number

11.0 Vegetation
Attachment B
Con^ctructfon Operation
2022 Total Emission Rate
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0265 Total DPM (lbs) 663.4120548 Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0554 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.14520S479 .Total DPM (g) 300923.7081 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.303561644 Construction Duration (days) 61 Emission Rate (g/s) 0.0030129011 Total DPM (lbs) 110.8 Total DPM(ibs) 8.8S7S34247 Release Height (meters) 3 Emission Rate |g/s) 0.001593699 Total DPM(g) 4017.777534 Total Acreage 1.277 Release HeishI (meters) 3 Start Date 11/1/2022 Max Horizontal (meters) 101.66 Total Acreage 1J77 End Date 1/1/2023 Min Horizontal (meters) 50.83 Max Horbontal (meters) 101.66 Construction Days 61 Initial Vertical Dimension (meters) 1.5 Min Korirontal (meters) 50.83 2023 Setting Urban Initial Vertical Dimension (meters) 1.5 Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.126| Population 32,701 Setting Urban Daily Emissions |tbs/day) a690410359 Start Date 11/1/2022 Population 32,701 Construction Duration (days) 365 End Date 12/31/20251
Total 0PM (lbs) 252 Total Construction Days 1156
Total 0PM (g) 114307.2 Total Years of Construction 3.17 Start Date 1/1/2023 Total Years of Operation 26.83
End Date 1/1/2024
Construction Days 365
2024
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.09651
Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0528767123
Construction Duration (days) 366
ToUIDPM(tbs) 193.5287671
ToUlDPM(g) 87784.64877
Start Date 1/1/2024
End Date 1/1/2025
Construction Days 366
202S
Annual Emissions (tons/year) ai048
Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.574246575
Construction Duration (days) 364
Total 0PM (lbs) 209.0257534
Total 0PM (g) 94814.08175
Start Date 1/1/2025
End Date 12/31/2025
Construction Days 364
Attachment C
Start date and time QH2'i/22 17:33:15
AERSCREEN 21112
Cheval Blanc, Construction
Cheval Blanc, Construction
** AREADATA **
--- DATA ENTRY VALIDATION •

METRIC ENGLISH
Emission Rate: 0.301E-02 g/s
Area Height: 3.00 meters
Area Source Length: 101.66 meters
Area Source Width: 50.83 meters
Vertical Dimension:

Model Mode:

Population:

Dist to Ambient Air

1.50 meters
URBAN
32701

1.0 meters

0.239E-01 Ib/hr

9.84 feet
333.53 feet
166.77 feet

4.92 feet

3. feet
** BUILDING DATA **
No Building Downwash Parameters
** TERRAIN DATA **
No Terrain Elevations
Source Base Elevation; 0.0 meters 0.0 feet
Probe distance: 5000. meters 16404. feet
No flagpole receptors
No discrete receptors used
** FUMIGATION DATA **
No fumigation requested
** METEOROLOGY DATA **
Min/Max Temperature: 250.0 / 310.0 K -9.7 / 98.3 Deg F
Minimum Wind Speed: 0.5 m/s
Anemometer Height: 10.000 meters
Dominant Surface Profile: Urban
Dominant Climate Type: Average Moisture
Surface friction velocity (u*): not adjusted

DEBUG OPTION ON
AERSCREEN output file:
2022.02.23 Aerscreen ChevalBlanc Construction.out
*** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin
No terrain used, AERMAP will not be run
**************************************************

SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET
Obtaining surface characteristics...

Using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Urban with Average Moisture Season Albedo Bo zo
Winter 0.35 1.50 1.000
Spring 0.14 1.00 1.000
Summer 0.16 2.00 1.000
Autumn 0.18 2.00 1.000
Creating met files aerscreen__01_01.sfc & aerscreen_01_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen__02_01.sfc & aerscreen_02_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen__03_01.sfc & aerscreen_03_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc & aerscreen_04_01.pfl Buildings and/or terrain present or rectangular area source, skipping probe FLOWSECTOR started 02/23/22 17:35:54
Running AERMOD
Processing Winter
Processing surface roughness sector 1
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
^*^^4:4(4:4'4e4:4c9|e9|e**9|e9|e*:)c:|c4:9t::|c:|c3|c9|c*:<c3|c3|c*:t:9|c^^^:it4(^9|(4'4:4ii(c%:f!4:3):4:4:4:4:4:

Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 5 *♦♦♦**** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 10 :|c:|c:|c%:i:«:|c:|c WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** none ***
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
:)e:ii:(:%:)i:(c:|c4:4::|c^:ic:|c:|c:ic:)c:|c:|c:)::(::)::jc:(c;|c:|e:ic:|c:|::fc:ic^:<(:|e4c^:ic^^!|c^i|(^!|t********** Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Running AERMOD
Processing Spring
Processing surface roughness sector 1
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 0 WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** none ***
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** none ***
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** none ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4 _
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** none ***
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector -20 ****♦♦♦* WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Running AERMOD
Processing Summer
Processing surface roughness sector 1
**♦****♦**********♦***************+******************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector --"'■0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** none ***
:|c4:********:i::i:4:*************4:************************** Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 10 ******** warning MESSAGES ********
*** none ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Running AERMOD
Processing Autumn
Processing surface roughness sector 1
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
4e***************:|c*:)c:fe:|c^^:|c4c4c9|e:|c4c4c:|c:ic:ic:(c4c4c:tc********3|c******* Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 5 WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** none ***
:4c*:jc:)e*:|(:|c3|c:|c^:fc:)::|c^^^:|(4e4:3|c********************************* Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Processing wind flow "Siector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*************3|«:|c:|c9|c^^4'********************************* Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
FLOWSECTOR ended 02/23/22 17:36:02
REFINE started 02/23/22 17:36:02
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 Winter sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
REFINE ended 02/23/22 17:36:03
AERSCREEN Finished Successfully
With no errors or warnings
Check log file for details
Ending date and time 02/23/22 17:36:04
Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Zo sector ZIMCH M-0 LEN ZO BO WEN ALBEDO REF WS HT REF TA

0.10625E+02 1.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.12805E+02 25.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.14463E+02 50.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
* 0.14545E+02 52.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.91917E+01 75.00 0.00 15.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.62071E+01 100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.45675E+01 125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.35582E+01 150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.28796E+01 175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.23986E+01 200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.20405E+01 225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.17681E+01 250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.15510E+01 275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.13776E+01 300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0,12348E+01 325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.11161E+01 350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.10156E+01 375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.93003E+00 400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.85598E+00 425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.79142E+00 450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.73498E+00 475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.68528E+00 500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.64121E+00 525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter
1,000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.60186E+00 550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.56640E+00 575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.53445E+00 600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
Date HO U* W* DT/DZZICNV
HT
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9,000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6,0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.23_Aerscreen_ChevalBlanc_Construction_max_conc_distance.txt[2/24/2022 3:32:18 PM]

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.50536E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.47890E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.45477E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.43271 E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.41244E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.39377E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.37653E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.36056E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.34575E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.33195E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.31909E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.30709E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.29585E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.28702E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.27696E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.26749E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.25857E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.25015E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.24220E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.23468E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.22755E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.22078E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.21436E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.20826E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.20245E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.19691E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.19163E+00

0.50 10
625.00
0^50 10
650.00

0.50 10
675.00

0.50 10
700.00
0,50 10
725.00

0.50 10
750.00

0.50 10
775.00

0.50 10
800.00

0.50 10
825.00

0.50 10
850.00

0.50 10
875.00

0.50 10
900.00

0.50 10
925.00

0.50 10,
950.00

0.50 10
975.00

0.50 10,
1000.00

0.50 10,
1025.00

0.50 10,
1050.00

0.50 10,
1075.00

0.50 10.
1100.00

0.50 10.
1125.00

0.50 10.
1150.00

0.50 10.
1175.00

0.50 10.
1200.00

0.50 10.
1225.00

0.50 10.
1250.00

0.50 10.
1275.00
.0 310.0

0.00 0.0
.0 310.0

0.00 5.0
.0 310.0

0.00 5.0
,0 310.0

0.00 5.0
.0 310.0

0.00 0.0
.0 310.0

0.00 0.0
,0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0

2.0 2.0

NO NO NO NO NO

CN CN CN CN CN
CJN On ON ON ON
On <3n ON ON ONOn ON
1 as 0\ ON
1 O O o o o

CN CN CN CN CN
p p p p p
d d d d d
o o o o oo o o o o
p p o o o
ON
1 ON C3N
1 On
1 ON
1 CO CO CO CO
"«a"
CO
o o o o p
d d d d d
o o o o o
p p p p p
—M f-^
o o o o oo o o o o
o o o o oo o o o o
~~
o o o o o

NO NO NO NO NO

CO CO CO CO CO
o o o, p o
CN
p
O
p o
o
ooo
^
oo
CO
o
•0 §
O ro
0) (L>
c c
CN
p
O
p o
•—
o
o
CO o
o
o°
(U (U
-<-> -4—>
c c
5 s
oo
O
in
CO
CN
p
o
P o
r-l
o
O
CO o
^
o
o°
o
O 2O CO
CN
p
o
P o
^
o
o
CO o
o
p®
CO
On
ONON
CN
vd
o
I
ON
oo
oo
p
CN
o
I
CO
NO
ooo
oo
CO
oo
CO
(L>
cr
«->
C .=
s ^
p p
CN CN
O
cd
poo
o
— o ^
CO o CO
12 ON
p
ooo
o
CN
o
ONON
ON
CN
NO
p
i
CO
NO
o
o
o
oo
CO
o
o
TJCO
5 c
0)
ONONON
CN
NO
o
I
ON
p
o
o
oo
CN
o
I
CO
NO
oo
oo
o
CO
oo
CO
c
lU
p o o o p

NO NO NO NO NO

CN CN CN CN CN

ON ON ON ON ONON ON ON ON ONON
1 C3N
1 ON
1 ON
1 ON
1 o o o o o

CN CN CN CN CN
o o o p p
d d d d d
o o o o oo o o o o
p p p p p
ON
1 ON
1 o\
1 ON
1 C3N
1 CO CO CO CO CO
o
lit
o o o o
d o o d d
o o o o o
p p p p p
1 1 1 1 1
1 , 1
o o o o oo o o o o —— 1—1 1—c 1-^
1-^ f—— T—1
o o o o oo o o o o
o o o o o

NO NO NO NO NO

CO CO CO CO CO
o o o o o
L. t.
a (U (U <L> (U
c
CN
p
o ® o
o
o § o
O o
<=> O
o
o ^ o
O CO o
® o®
o o
p _ p
m ^ o
CN 1; in
O
p p
CN CN
® o
O 2 o
o o
^ o ^ o
CO O CO o
® ® p p
o o
^ o ^ o
^ ® ® o .• o ^
c2 "O §
o ^ o in
c
CN
p
o
p o
f-«
o
o
CO o
o
p®
oo
o in
?
c
CN
p
o
p cd
^
o
o
CO o
^
<d
p®
o
® o
o m
5 c
CN
p
o
P o
-H
o
O
CO o
o
p°
m
5 c
CN
p
O
p d
o
o
CO o
^
o
o®
o
O NO
ON
oooo
CN
o
On
ONON
CN
NO*
p
I
CO
NO
o
o
ooo
CO
oo
CO
s
c
•4-»
u
CN
p
o
p o
^
d
o
CO o
d
o®
o
O NO
CN
NO
p
CN
NO
p
On OnOn On
ON On
ON
p
oo
O
CN
O
I
CO
NOo
oooo
COo
o
■N!}*
CO
ONpoooCNo
I
CO
NO
oooooCOooCO
ONONONCNNOp
I
ONooodpCNo
I
CO
NO
o
ooooCOooCO
p p p p p p p p p p

NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
1-H

CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN
ON ON On ON ON ON ON ON ON C3NON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ONON •
On ON
1 ON
1 ON
1 ON
1 ON
1 ON
1 as On
o O O o o O o o o O

CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN
p p O o o O o o O pd d d o d d d d d do o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o o o oo o o o p p p p p pON 1 On ON
1 ON
1 ON
1 ON
1 On <d ON
1 ON
1 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
rf
p O o o o o O o o od d d d d d o d d do o o o o o o o o op p p p p p p p p p 1-M 1-^ 1—1 1—1 1—1 1-^o o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o o o o 1-^ 1—4 —— 1-^ 1-^ 1-— 1-HT—4 —— T—1 f—— 1-H
o o o o o O ■ o o o oo o o o o o o o o o
o o o o o o o o o oNO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NOCO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO COo o o o o o o CO CO CO a> aj j3 a) o u 4) O o <u <L> w <u 4—• ■4—4 4—4 4-4 4^ 4—4 4—4 4—4 4—4 4^ 4-4 4—4 .S .S •- .S .S .S .£ .S .S .S .S .£ .S
p pCN CN
p p
o d o d
d d
^ o ^ o
CO O CO o
d d
o o
o o
® o ^ m ^ m ^ rO NO O NO
CNp
o
o o^ d
o
CO o
p ®
^
d
o
•n §
o t-.

CNp
O
o d^ o
o
CO op ®^ d
o
Ss
CNp
O
p d-N o
o
CO o^ dp®
o
® oo r-"
CNp
O
p d^ o
o
CO o
O
p®
o
CNp
O
p d
^
o
o
CO o^
dp®
o
2 § O00
p pCN CN
o
p d pd d4-h o ^CO o COo ® o— o ^
5 •n mO 00 o
p p p pCN CN CN CN
p p p p pdododoiriod
d d d d
ocoocoocoocoo
o^o^o^o^o
p p p od d d d
o p_p_p_p_po'~'o'~'o^on^o
i/-\ in I/-) o I/-J ^ o
OOOooOOnOonOOn«^^t^!2o^cN^in
CQ
CO
m
ooNONOoW
+
o
o
CO
m
o °8
COin
00 i
>n
oo
C--
o 2: . o . o o o
inodCOin
in
oo
CO
m
inodCO
in
COm
in
NO
C?N
CNW
+
oo
COm
m
od
pin
modCOm
r-^
OnOn
O OO ^ OO O O
uj ®
NONO
o
o. O
o o
inodCOin
inooCOin
co
t--£oo
modCOm
modCO
m
CO
OOCNU
+
oo
inodCO
m
CN
ON
rW
+
oo
m
od
CO
m
CNNONO£
+
o
o
in
o
dCO
in
CNoo
inooCO
in
CNrmW
+
oo ®
COm
§
o
On
i

O ZZO O
O
o
COm
i
"n o^
t--CN
o o
o o
oo
modCOm
modpm
oON
U
+
o
o
modpm
ooo
ooo
°s
CO
in. CO
r-4
C>-
O
o 2o . o o

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.10518E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.10338E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.10164E+00

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.99945E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.98299E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.96700E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.95145E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.93633E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.92162E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.9073 lE-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.89338E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.8798 lE-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.86660E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.85373E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.84118E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.82895E-01
1,000 1.50 0.35

0.81703E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.80540E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.79405E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.78298E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.77217E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.76162E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.75131E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.74125E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.73141E-01 ^

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.72180E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.71241E-01

0.50 10
1975.00

0.50 10
2000.00

0.50 10
2025.00

0.50 10
2050.00

0.50 10
2075.00

0.50 10
2100.00

0.50 10
2125.00

0.50 10
2150.00

0.50 10
2175.00

0.50 10
2200.00

0.50 10
2224.99

0.50 10
2250.00

0.50 10
2275.00

0.50 10
2300.00

0.50 10
2325.00

0.50 10
2350.00

0.50 10
2375.00

0.50 10
2400.00

0.50 10
2425.00

0.50 10
2449.99

0.50 10
2475.00

0.50 10
2500.00

0.50 10
2525.00

0.50 10,
2550.00

0.50 10,
2575.00

0.50 10,
2600.00

0.50 10,
2625.00
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
.0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
.0 310.0
0:00 5.0
.0 310.0

0.00 20.0
,0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 30.0
0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 20.0
0 310.0

0.00 15.0
0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 25.0
0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 25.0
0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 15.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0
0:00 0.0
0 310.0

0.T)0 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 20.0

2.0 2.0

2.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.02D-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 2). 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21, 6.0
-1.30 0.043 -9.000.0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020 -999. 21; 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
file:///CAJsers/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.23_Aerscreen_ChevalBlanc_Construction_max_conc_distance.txt[2/24/2022 3:32:18 PM] §
(/)
(/)
5 5
o.
>
«
oo
'n
sr
n
65 o
o
3 Mr ■
p
b
p
b
p
b
p
b
p
b
p
b
p
b
p
b
p
b
p
b
p
b
p
b
p
b
o
b
o
b
o
b
o
b
o
b
o
b
o
b
p
b
o
b
p
b
o
b
o
b
p
b
o
Oi
to
oo
b
to
oo
Ul
U)
oo U)
oo
b
■ti.
oo
Ln-fi.
o
o
L/1L/1
oo
L/1On
oo
L/1On
oo
L/1
-o
oo
L/1
00 oo
L/100
oo
L/1VO
oo
ONo
oo
bio
oo
On
oo
b\
to
o
o
bv
to
oo
b\u>
oo
b\
-li.
oo
b\
L/1
oo
b\On
o
o
bvov
o
o
bv•o
oo
b\oo
o
o
bvVO
oo
o
o On 1-^ •o u> VO L/1 >—« -O U)
o ON U)
o ■o I-— VO ov to
O 00 ov L/1 .(i. U)
00 I—' U> 1—' 00 -f^ to 1—. >—»
o I—. 1—« U> 1—' ON 1—» 1—' •o >—1 -li. to to ►—* U) .—1 Lh ^-1 o K—• L/1 ■—i to 1—. to 1—. 4i. b—> OO 1—1 to i_i to
o«m1
bo
0m1
bo
-Pi.W1
b
o
VOm1
Lh
O
m1
bo
s
bo
00m1
L/1
o
-Om1
L/io
-Om
Ul
o
VO
mt
L/1o
-Ji.m1
L/1o
s1 L»i
o
51 L/1
o
4i^m
L/1o
tom
L/1o
LOm
L/1o
VOcn
L/1o
om
L/1
o
ovm
L/1o
VOm
L/1o
•om
t-/io
U)
m
L/1o
Onrn
L/1o
■om
L/1o
0\m
L-/1
o
L/1m
L/1
o
U)m
o
o
o
o
o
b
o
o
b
o
o
o
o
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
o
o ■—'
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o ■—
o
o
o
o
o
—
o
o
o
o
U)
LTi
U)O
P
o u«b
o
o
U)
Ul
u> u>K) ^ to■o
P
o
b
b
o
o
p
o ®
o
u>
U)
P to
U«
O
bo
U)
u>
p
s
iJt voO
bVO
u> u>Lh u»
u>
p c;O ;o
VO
Po
U)Ul
U) OJ
P ?3ty»O
bo
U,ob
ob
bo
LO
bo U)
b
o
OJ
bo U)
bo u>
bo u>
t—»
bo
L/1
Ob
u>o
pb
I—.
o
pb
p
pb
o
ob
o
pb L/1
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
to to to to to to
b
b
b
b
b
b
3*
3 3 5' 5' 3' 3'
fp fP
•-1
fp
■-t
o fp
■1
r-1-fP■-«
fp■-t
u>
U)
P
o
L/1
O
U)L/1
U)
P
®<-'1b o o
P P
P b Q b ^ b
lO g Ui g U)o ^ o
o
o o o 1:^
o
b
®
to
b
to
b
<=>
o
o
o
oI—»
hoo
b
b
to
b
to
b
U)Ul
u>
p
®
Ui
o
S'fC
u>Ul
U)
p
s
o
^
o
p
o
o
^ L.J
^
o
o
® ►- y" b
o
®
b
tob
o
■-t
3'3"
U) u>Ul u»
U)
P o
P
Lrt
O
o o <=>
o
o
o
b o
^
b^b ObOto to
b
b
5'3"
UJ
U)
L/l
•O P <-ri
^ Ln
^
b
b
o
o
p
o ®
o
® C.J
®
o
o
_
o
P
b
o
o
tob
5' 5'n> fp
u>L/t
to
P toU/J Ul
O
bo
U)U)
to
P
oO
O
bo
U) u>
u»
to
p ^
p Ln ui ui
o b
o
o
w
o
o
<=> p'o
^
o
O
o
bob
b
to tob
b
5'Fd■-t
o
o
o
o
o
o
O
o
. ®
®
b^b® o
o
tob
5' 5'Ct' r-fn> fp
to
b
u>
to
2^p O U>
b <=o
p
p b
p
§
§
P b
P
o
o
to
b
U)
to
Spb
o
o
OJ
to
§POb
o
o
U)Ul
to
^
p Lh L/1
b <=o
oO
Po
O Hb
ob
to
b
5 <p
o
o
'<=> p'<=>
o
o ^
o
b
b
b
to to
b
b
5fp
U)
to
oi
p
ob
o
o
p
o ®
o
^ L.J
®
O
o
O
P Poo
®
b
tob
U)
to
to
P
^ Ulb
o
o
pb
u>
to
o
P
o u»b
o
o
o
p
®
o
p ^
p bpb
U)
to3pU»b
o
o
o
o
o
tob
to
b
S.
3 CP fp
\^9
o
oOJL/1
to
Sip O Ui
b
o
o
o
o <=>
g U> g U)to
p
o <oi
b
to
b
o
btob
g « g «
«
3f—fo
•32
0 1 o
o
o
o
o
0 1 o
0 1 o
0 1 o
o
0 1
o
o
o
0 1
0 1
0 1 o
o
0 1 o
o
o
o
U)
ovo
1 U)ovo
1 U)
g
LOOVo
1 OJov
o
1 OJOvO
U)
ovo
wOvo
OJ
OvO
1 U)ovo
u>ovo
U)
OvO
U)
ovo
U)
ovo
U)OvO
i
UJovo
UJ
Ovo
UJovo
UJOvo
UJ
ovo
UJOv
o
1 UJovo
UJovo
UJovo
UJ
Ovo
1 UJovo
1 UJovo
oo
o
o
o
o
oo
oo
Oo
oo
oo
Oo
oo
oo
Oo
oo
,o
o
Oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
o
p .o
o
§
o
p
po
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
o
o
oo
oo
oo
oo
o
o
oo
oo
o
o
oo
o
o
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
1 1 ,1 V'
i—*
. 1 . !| 1
1 1
H1
1 I
1 1
1 1
1 ' 1 1,
. : 1 1
Loo Lk)
o
ioo
u>o L>j
o
too
LJO to
o
LJ
O UJ
o
Loo
UJo
Lo
o
UJo
UJo
UJo
Loo
Loo
UJo
Loo
Loo
Loo
LJO UJ
o
OJo
UJo
UJo
ob-ti.u>
ob-pi.U)
ob■Pi.U)
ob-li.u>
ob
-pi
U)
ob
-ti.

U)
ob
-Ji.
u>
ob-pi.U)
O
b
-pi.

U)
ob
-u
U)
ob-pi.u>
ob
-pi.U)
o
b-ti.U)
ob
-pi
U)
ob-pi.UJ
ob-piu>
o'o
-ti.

UJ
obj^i.UJ
o
b
-pi.

UJ
ob-PU)
ob-pi.U)
ob
-p.

U)
o
b4S>.U)
obU)
ob
-Pi.

UJ
ob-pi.u>
ob-p.UJ
VOboo
1 VOboo
1 VOboo
vbboo
vbboo
vbboo
vbboo
1 VOboo
vb
boo
vbboo
vbboo
vbboo
vb
b
oo
vbboo
vbboo
1 VOboo
vbboo
vb
boo
vbboo
vbboo
1 pb
oo
1 VOboo
vbboo
pboo
vbboo
vbboo
1 pb
oo
obtoo
ob
to
o
obtoo
obtoo
ob
to
o
o
b
to
o
ob
to
o
obtoo
ob
too
ob
to
o
obtoo
ob
to
o
o
btoo
p
b
to
o
obtoo
obtoo
ob
to
o
obtoo
o'o
too
obtoo
ob
to
o
pbtoo
ob
to
o
ob
to
o
pbtoo
obtoo
pbto
o
vbVOp
vbVOp
1 VOVOp
vbVOp
vbVOVO
vbVOp
vbVOp
1 VOVOp
vbVOp
vbVOp
vbVOp
vbVOp
vb
VO
p
vbVOp
vbVOp
vbVOp
vbVOp
vbVOp
vbVOp
vbVOp
1 VOVOp
vbVO
p
vbVOp
1 VOVO
p
vbVOp
1 VOVO
p
1 VOVOp
to to to to
to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to 0*9
0*9
0*9

6.0 0*9
0*9

0.6 6.0

6.0 6.0

6.0 0*9

6.0 6.0

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.51550E-01 3325.00 0.00 15.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.51024E-01 3350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.50508E-01 3375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.50000E-01 3400.00 O.-OO 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.49501E-01 3425.00 0.00 0.0 ' Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.4901 lE-01 3450.00 O.OO 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.48529E-01 3475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.48056E-01 3500.00 0.00 20.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.47590E-01 3525.00 0.00 25.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.47132E-01 3550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.46682E-01 3575.00 0.00 15.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.46239E-01 3600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.45803E-01 3625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.45375E-01 3650.00 0.00 0.0 -Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.44953E-01 3675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.44538E-01 3700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.44129E-01 3724.99 0.00 20.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.43727E-01 3750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.43332E-01 3775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.42942E-01 3800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.42559E-01 3825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.42181E-01 3849.99 0.00 15.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.41809E-01 3875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.41443E-01 3900.00 0:00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.41082E-01 3925.00- 0.00 5.0 ■ Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.40727E-01 3950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.40377E-01 3975.00 0.00 5.0 -Winter
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21: 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 23, 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. ZlT 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999, 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-99.9. 21-. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21'. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.23_Aerscreen_ChevalBlanc_Construction_max_conc_distance.txt[2/24/2022 3:32:18 PM] j'T^
.000 1.50 0

0.40032E-01
,000 1.50 0

0.39692E-01
,000 1.50 0,

0.39358E-01
,000 1.50 0,

0.39028E-01
,000 1.50 0,

0.38703E-01
,000 1.50 0,

0.38382E-01
000 1.50 0.

0.38066E-01
000 1.50 0.

0.37755E-01
000 1.50 0.

0.37448E-01
000 1.50 0.

0.37145E-01
000 1.50 0.

0.36846E-01
000 1.50 0.

0.36552E-01
000 1.50 0.

0.36262E-01
000 1.50 0.

0.35975E-01
000 1.50 0.

0.35693E-01
000 1.50 0.

0.35414E-01
000 1.50 0.

0.35139E-01
000 1.50 0.

0.34868E-01
000 1.50 0.

0.34600E-01
000 1.50 0.

0.34336E-01
000 1.50 0.

0.34076E-01
000 1.50 0.

0.33818E-01
000 1.50 0.

0.33564E-01
000 1.50 0.

0.33314E-01
000 1.50 0.

0.33066E-01
000 1.50 0.

0.32822E-01
000 1.50 0.

0.32581E-01
,35 0.50 10,
4000.00
35 0.50 10,
4025.00
35 0.50 10.
4050.00
35 0.50 10.
4075.00
35 0.50 10.
4100.00
35 0.50 10.
4125.00
35 0.50 10.
4150.00
35 0.50 10.
4175.00
35 0.50 10.
4200.00
35 0.50 10.
4225.00
35 0.50 10.
4250.00
35 0.50 10.
4275.00
35 0.50 10.
4300.00
35 0.50 10.
4325.00
35 0.50 10.
4350.00
35 0.50 10.
4375.00
35 0.50 10.
4400.00
35 0.50 10.
4425.00
35 0.50 10.
4450.00
35 0.50 10.
4475.00
35 0.50 10.
4500.00
35 0.50 10.
4525.00
35 0.50 10.
4550.00
35 0.50 10.
4575.00
35 0.50 10.
4600.00
35 0.50 10.
4625,00
35 0.50 10.
4650.00
0 310.0

0.00 15.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 10.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 10.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 10.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 10.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 10.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 20,0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0

2.0 2.0

4.30 0.043 t9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0

4.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0

4.30 0.043L-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0

4.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
file;///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.23_Aerscreen_ChevalBlanc_Construction_max_conc_distance.txt[2/24/2022 3:32:18 PM]

1.000 1.50 0

0.32343E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.32108E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.31876E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.31647E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.31420E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.31197E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.30976E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.30758E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.30542E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.30329E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.30119E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.2991 lE-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.29706E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.29503E-01

1.000 1.50 0.
,35 0.50 10
4675.00
,35 0.50 10
4700.00
35 0.50 10
4725.00
35 0.50 10,
4750.00
35 0.50 10,
4775.00
35 0.50 10,
4800.00
35 0.50 10,
4825.00
35 0.50 10.
4850.00
35 0.50 10.
4875.00
35 0.50 10.
4900.00
35 0.50 10.
4925.00
35 0.50 10.
4950.00
35 0.50 10.
4975.00
35 0.50 10,
5000.00
35 0.50 10.
,0 310.0

0.00 0.0
,0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 25.0
0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

2.0 Winter

2.0 i Winter

2.0 .'ir. Winter

2.0 '"Winter

2.0 Winter

2.0 - Winter

2.0 0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.23_Aerscreen_ChevalBlanc_Construction_max_conc_distance.txt[2/24/2022 3:32:18 PM] start date and time 02/21/22 16:34:38
AERSCREEN 21112
Cheval Blnac, Operation
Cheval Blnac, Operation
--- DATA ENTRY VALIDATION •

METRIC ENGLISH
** AREADATA **
Emission Rate: 0.159E-02 g/s 0.126E-01 Ib/hr
Area Height: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet
Area Source Length: 101.66 meters 333.53 feet
Area Source Width: 50.83 meters 166.77 feet
Vertical Dimension: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet
Model Mode: URBAN
Population: 32701
Dist to Ambient Air: 1.0 meters 3. feet
** BUILDING DATA **
No Building Downwash Parameters
** TERRAIN DATA **
No Terrain Elevations
Source Base Elevation: 0.0 meters 0.0 feet
Probe distance: 5000. meters 16404. feet
No flagpole receptors
No discrete receptors used
*» FUMIGATION DATA **
No fumigation requested
** METEOROLOGY DATA »*
Min/Max Temperature: 250.0 / 310.0 K -9.7 / 98.3 Deg F
Minimum Wind Speed: 0.5 m/s
Anemometer Height: 10.000 meters
Dominant Surface Profile: Urban
Dominant Climate Type: Average Moisture
Surface friction velocity (u*): not adjusted

DEBUG OPTION ON
AERSCREEN output file:
2022.02.21_Aerscreen_ChevalBlanc_0peration.out
♦** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin
No terrain used, AERMAP will not be run

SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET
Obtaining surface characteristics...

Using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics; for Urban with Average Moisture Season Albedo Bo zo
Winter 0.35 1.50 1.000
Spring 0.14 1.00 1.000
Summer 0.16 2.00 1.000
Autumn 0.18 2.00 1.000
Creating met files aerscreen_01_01.sfc & aerscreen_01_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_02_01.sfc & aerscreen_02_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_03_01.sfc & aerscreen_03_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc & aerscreen_04_01.pfl Buildings and/or terrain present or rectangular area source, skipping probe FLOWSECTOR Started 02/21/22 16:36:57
Running AERMOD
Processing Winter
Processing surface roughness sector 1 .

Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 0 ««:KiK:ic:i(iie* WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** none ***
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** none ***
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** none ***
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERROD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 15 ******** WARNING RESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERROD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 20 ******** WARNING RESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
% 4i :1c 3|e 9|c 4::)(:4e 9|e 9|c:tc :ic :ic :)c :)c :)e :|e :|c :fc :|c :|c :)c :|c :|c :|c :|c ************************ * Processing wind flow sector 6
AERROD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 25 4:**4c**** WARNING RESSAGES ********
*** none ***
:|c****************************:(c:{c:(c:|c:|c:|c:|c:|c4::lc:jc:ic:|c:lc:jc4::|c4c%:|c**** Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Running AERMOD
Processing Spring
Processing surface roughness sector 1
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 10 4::):****** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 15 :(c:ie****** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 25 WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Running AERMOD
Processing Summer
Processing surface roughness sector 1
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
**************************************:•:************** Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
**************%^4c**************4c:|c^^3|c:|i:i::t:4:***N'********* Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** none ***
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 25 ««****** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
******^:(c4:9t:3|s:|e*:|c4:9|c3t:****4!******4c*************** Running AERMOD
Processing Autumn
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****:t:***************4:************ + 4:***************** Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
******************* ^*3H** ************ *:fc:ic****4(*******.** Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** none ***
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** none ***
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES *♦****♦♦
*** NONE ***
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ♦****♦♦*
*** NONE ***
FLOWSECTOR ended 02/21/22 16:37:05
REFINE started 02/21/22 16:37:05
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 Winter sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
REFINE ended Q2I21122 16:37:07
AERSCREEN Finished Successfully
With no errors or warnings
Check log file for details
Ending date and time 02/21/22 16:37:08
Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Zo sector

ZIMCH M-OLEN ZO BO WEN ALBEDO REF WS HT REP TA

0.56197E+01 1.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

2.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

52.00 0.00 0.0

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0

0.67728E+01 25.00 0.00 0.0

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0

0.76494E+01 50.00 0.00 0.0
* 0.76927E+01 Winte

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.48615E+01 75.00 0.00 15.0 Winte

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.32829E+01 100.00 0.00 0.0 Winte

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.24158E+01 125.00 0.00 0.0 Winte

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.18819E+01 150.00 0.00 0.0 Winte

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.15230E+01 175.00 0.00 0.0 Winte

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.12686E+01 200.00 0.00 0.0 Winte

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.10792E+01 225.00 0.00 0.0 Winte

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.93512E+00 250.00 0.00 0.0 Winte

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.82029E+00 275.00 0.00 0.0 Winte

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.72859E+00 300.00 0.00 0.0 Winte

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.65309E+00 325.00 0.00 0.0 Winte

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.5903lE+00 350.00 0.00 0.0 Winte

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.53714E+00 375.00 0.00 0.0 Winte

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.49189E+00 400.00 0.00 0.0 Winte

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.45272E+00 425.00 0.00 0.0 Winte

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.41858E+00 450.00 0.00 0.0 Winte

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.38873E+00 475.00 0.00 0.0 Winte

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.36244E+00 500.00 0.00 0.0 Winte

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.33913E+00 525.00 0.00 0.0 Winte

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.31832E+00 550.00 0.00 0.0 Winte

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.29957E+00 575.00 0.00 0.0 Winte

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.28267E+00 600.00 0.00 0.0 Winte
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
Date HO U* W* DT/DZZICNV
HT
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.21_Aerscreen_ChevalBlanc_Operation_max_conc_distance.txt[2/24/2022 3:32:48 PM]

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.26728E+00 625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.25329E+00 650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.24053E+00 675.00 0.00 5.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.22886E+00 700.00 0.00 5.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.3,5 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.21814E+00 ' 725.00 0.00 5.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.20826E+00 750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.19915E+00 775.00 0.00 5.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.19070E+00 800.00 0.00 5.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.18287E+00 825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.17557E+00 850.00 0.00 5.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.16876E+00 875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.16242E+00 900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.15647E+00 925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.15180E+00 950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50- 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.14648E+00 975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.14148E+00 1000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.13676E+00 1025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.13231E+00 1050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.12810E+00 1075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.12412E+00 1100.00 0.00 5.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.12035E+00 1125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.11677E+00 1150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.11338E+00 1175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.11015E+00 1200.00 0.00 5.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.5a 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.10707E+0() 1225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.10415E+00 1250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter

1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.10135E+00 1275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000" 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020 r999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.060 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
file:///C/Users/swinn/DownIoads/2022.02.21_Aerscreen_ChevalBlanc_Operation_niax_conc_distance.txt[2/24/2022 3:32:48 PM]

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.98690E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.96145E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.93711E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.91382E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.89151E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.87013E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.84963E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.82994E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.81104E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.79286E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.77538E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.75856E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.74236E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.72675E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.71170E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.69718E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.68317E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.66964E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.65656E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.64392E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.63170E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.61987E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.60842E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.59734E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.58660E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.57618E-01

1.000 1.50 0.35

0.56609E-01

0.50 10.0
1300.00 0

0.50 10.0
1325.00 0

0.50 10.0
1350.00 0

0.50 10.0
1375.00 0,

0.50 10.0
1400.00 0,

0.50 10.0
1425.00 0,

0.50 10.0
1450.00 0,

0.50 10.0
1475.00 0,

0.50 10.0
1500.00 0,

0.50 10.0
1525.00 0.

0.50 10.0
1550.00 0.

0.50 10.0
1574.99 0,

0.50 10.0
1600.00 0.

0.50 10.0
1625.00 0.

0.50 10.0
1650.00 0.

0.50 10.0
1675.00 0.

0.50 10.0
1700.00 0.

0.50 10.0
1725.00 0.

0.50 10.0
1750.00 0.

0.50 10.0
1775.00 0.

0.50 10.0
1800.00 0.

0.50 10.0
1825.00 0.

0.50 10.0
1850.00 0.

0.50 10.0
1875.00 0.

0.50 10.0
1899.99 0.

0.50 10.0
1924.99 0.

0.50 10.0
1950.00 0.
310.0
00 5.0
310.0
00 0.0
310.0
00 5.0
310.0
00 0.0
310.0
00 5.0
310.0
00 15.0
310.0
00 5.0
310.0
00 0.0
310.0
00 5.0
310.0
00 10.0
310.0
00 5.0
310.0
00 25.0
310.0
00 5.0
310.0
00 10.0
310.0
00 20.0
310.0
00 10.0
310.0
00 10.0
310.0
00 10.0
310.0
00 10.0
310.0
00 10.0
310.0
00 10.0
310.0
00 10.0
310.0
00 10.0
310.0
00 10.0
310.0
00 25.0
310.0
00 5.0
310.0
00 0.0

2.0 2.0

2.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0t360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-3'60 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter . 0^360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.21_Aerscreen_ChevalBlanc_Operation_max_conc_distance.txt[2/24/2022 3:32:48 PM]

1.000 1.50 0

0.55629E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.54679E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.53757E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.52860E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.51990E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.51144E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.50322E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.49522E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.48744E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.47987E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.4725 lE-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.46533E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.45834E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.45153E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.44490E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.43843E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.43212E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.42597E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.41997E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.41412E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.40840E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.40282E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.39737E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.39204E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.38684E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.38176E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.37679E-01
.35 0.50 10
1975.00
.35 0.50 10
2000.00
.35 0.50 10
2025.00
.35 0.50 10
2O5O.O'0
,35 0.50 10
2075.00"
,35 0.50 10
2100.00
,35 0.50 10
2125.00
,35 0.50 10
2150.00
,35 0.50 10
2175.00
,35 0.50 10
2200.00
35 0.50 10
2225.00
,35 0.50 10
2250.00
35 0.50 10
2275.00
35 0.50 10
2300.00
35 0.50 10
2325.00
35 0.50 10
2350.00
35 0.50 10
2375.00
35 0.50 10,
2400.00
35 0.50 10,
2425.00
35 0.50 10,
2449.99
35 0.50 10,
2475.00
35 0.50 10,
2500.00
35 0.50 10,
2525.00
35 0.50 10,
2550.00
35 0.50 10,
2575.00
35 0.50 10,
2600.00
35 0.50 10.
2625.00
.0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 5.0
.0 310.0

0.00 0.0
.0 310.0

0.00' 5.0
,0 310.0

0.00 15.0
,0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 20.0
0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 15.0
0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 -0.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 25.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 20.0

2.0 2.0

1.000 1.50 0

0.37193E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.36718E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.36254E-01

1.000 1.50 0
- 0.35799E-01

1.000 1.50 0
• 0.35355E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.34919E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.34493E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.34076E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.33668E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.33268E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.32876E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.32492E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.32116E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.31747E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.31385E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.31031E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.30683E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.30342E-01
1,000 1.50 0.

0.30008E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.29680E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.29358E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.29042E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.28732E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.28428E-01
LOOO 1.50 0.

0.28129E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.27836E-01

1.000 1.50 0,
0;27547E-01
.35 0.50 10
2650.00
.35 0.50 10
2675.00
.35 0.50 10
2700.00
.35 0.50 10
2725.00
.35 0.50 10
2750.00
,35 0.50 10
2775.00
,35 0.50 10
2800.00
,35 0.50 10
2825.00
,35 0.50 10
2850.00
35 0.50 10,
2875.00
35 0.50 10,
2900.00
35 0.50 10,
2925.00
35 0.50 10,
2950.00
35 0.50 10,
2975.00
35 0.50 10,
3000.00
35 0.50 10.
3025.00
35 0.50 10.
3050.00
35 0.50 10.
3075.00
35 0.50 10.
3100.00
35 0.50 10.
3125.00
35 0.50 10.
3150.00
35 0.50 10.
3174.99
35 0.50 10.
3200.00
35 0.50 10.
3225.00
35 0.50 10.
3250.00
35 0.50 10,
3275.00
35 0.50 10.
3300.00
.0 310.0

0.00 0.0
.0 310.0

0.00 10.0
.0 310.0

0.00 15.0
.0 310.0

0.00 0.0
.0 310.0

0.00 5.0
.0 310.0

0.00 0.0
.0 310.0

0.00 5.0
,0 310.0

0.00 10.0
,0 310.0

0.00 5.0
,0 310.0

0.00 0.0
,0 310.0

0.00 5.0
,0 310.0

0.00 0.0
,0 310.0

0.00 10.0
,0 310.0

0.00 0.0
,0 310.0

0.00 10.0
0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0

2.0 2.0

2.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 lOOlTOl
Winter 0-360 1001E901
Winter 0-360 10014:001
Winter 0-360 10014001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011:001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. '21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 :0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
fi!e:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.21_Aerscreen_ChevalBlanc_Operation_inax_conc_distance.txt[2/24/2022 3:32:48 PM]

1.000 1.50 0

0.27265E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.26987E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.26713E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.26445E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.26181E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.25922E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.25667E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.25417E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.25170E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.24928E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.24690E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.24456E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.24225E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.23998E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.23775E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.23556E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.23340E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.23127E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.22918E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.22712E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.22509E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.22309E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.22113E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.21919E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.21728E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.21540E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.21355E-01
.35 0.50 10
3325.00
.35 0.50 10
3350.00
35 0.50 10
3375.00
35 0.50 10
3400.00
.35 0.50 10
3425.00
.35 0.50 10
3450.00
.35 0.50 10
3475.00
.35 0.50 10
3500.00
.35 0.50 10
3525.00
,35 0.50 10
3550.00
.35 0.50 10
3575.00
,35 0.50 10
3600.00
,35 0.50 10
3625.00
,35 0.50 10
3650.00
35 0.50 10,
3675.00
35 0.50 10,
3700.00
35 0.50 10,
3725.00
35 0.50 10,
3750.00
35 0.50 10,
3775.00
35 0.50 10,
3800.00
35 0.50 10.
3825.00
35 0.50 10.
3850.00
35 0.50 10.
3875.00
35 0.50 10.
3900.00
35 0.50 10.
3925.00
35 0.50 10.
3950.00
35 0.50 10.
3975.00
.0 310.0

0.00 =0.0
.0 310.0

0.00-5.0
.0 310.0

0.00-0.0
.0 310.0

0.00 ?0.0
.0 310.0

0.00"25.0
.0 310.0

0.00 0.0
,0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 -0.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 5.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00- 0.0
0 310.0
JO.OO. 0.0
0 310.0

0.00-0.0
0 310.0

0.00 -0.0

2.0 Winter

2.0 Winter
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. - 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. ^ 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. -. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21.' --6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. - 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. / 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. =6.0
file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.21_Aerscreen_ChevalBlanc_Operation_niax_conc_distance.txt[2/24/2022 3:32:48 PM]

1.000 1.50 0

0.21173E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.20993E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.20816E-01
LOOO 1.50 0

0.2O642E^O1

1.000 1.50 0
•-0;20470E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.20300E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.20133E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.19968E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.19806E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.19646E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.19488E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.19332E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.19179E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.19027E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.18878E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.18730E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.18585E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.18442E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.18300E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.18160E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.18022E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.17886E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.17752E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.17620E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.17489E=01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.17360E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.17232E-01
35 0.50 10
4000.00
35 0.50 10
4025.00
.35 0.50 10
4050.00
.35 0.50 10
4075.00
,35 0.50 10
4100.00
,35 0.50 10
4125.00
,35 0.50 10
4149.99
,35 0.50 10
4175.00
,35 0.50 10
4200.00
35 0.50 10
4225.00
35 0.50 10
4250.00
35 0.50 10
4275.00
35 0.50 10
4300.00
35 0.50 10,
4325.00
35 0.50 10,
4350.00
35 0.50 10,
4375.00
35 0.50 10,
4400.00
35 0.50 10,
4425.00
35 0.50 10.
4450.00
35 0.50 10.
4475.00
35 0.50 10.
4500.00
35 0.50 10.
4525.00
35 0.50 10.
4550.00
35 0.50 10.
4575.00
35 0.50 10.
4600.00
35 0.50 10.
4625.00
35 0.50 10.
4650.00
.0 310.0

0.00 0.0
.0 310.0

0.00 20.0
,0 310.0

0.00 0.0
.0 310.0

0.00 0.0
,0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0

2.0 2.0

1.000 1.50 0

0.17106E-01

1.000 1.50 0

0.16982E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.16859E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.16738E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.16618E-01

1.000 1.50 0,

0.16500E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.16383E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.16268E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.16154E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.16041E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.15930E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.15820E-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.1571 lE-01

1.000 1.50 0.

0.15604E-01

1.000 1.50 0.
,35 0.50 10
4675.00
35 0.50 10
4700.00
35 0.50 10
4725.00
35 0.50 10,
4750.00
35 0.50 10,
4775.00
35 0.50 10,
4800.00
35 0.50 10,
4825.00
35 0.50 10,
4850.00
35 0.50 10.
4875.00
35 0.50 10.
4900.00
35 0.50 10.
4924.99
35 0.50 10.
4950.00
35 0.50 10.
4975.00
35 0.50 10.
5000.00
35 0.50 10.
,0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

0.00 15.0
0 310.0

0.00 0.0
0 310.0

2.0 2.0

2.0 2.0
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
mntQr 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0-360 10011001
Winter 0=360 10011001
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0
-1.30 0.043-9.000 0.020-999. 21. 6.0

2.0 file:///CAJsers/swinn/Do\vnloads/2022.02.21_Aerscreen_ChevalBlanc_Operation_max_conc_distance.txt[2/24/2022 3:32:48 PM] Attachment D
SWAPE
Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and
Litigation Support for the Environment
2656; 29*'' Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Investigation and Remediation Strategies
Litigation Support and Testifying Expert
Industrial Stormwater Compliance
CEQA Review
Education:

M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.

B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982. : Prof essionaLCertifications:

California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
Professional Experience:

Matt has 30 years of experience in environmental policy, contaminant assessment and remediation, stormwater compliance, and CEQA review. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA's Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Westem Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groimdwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and directed efforts to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. For the past 15 years, as a founding partner with SWAPE, Matt has developed extensive client relationships and has managed complex projects that include consultation as an expert witness and a regulatory specialist, and a manager of projects ranging from industrial stormwater compliance to CEQA review of impacts from hazardous waste, air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.

Positions Matt has held include:
• Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 - present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 - 2104,2017; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H20 Science, Inc. (2000 - 2003); Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 - 2004);
Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989- 1998);
Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, V^ater Resources Division (1998 - 2000); Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 - 1998);
Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 -1995); Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 -1998); and
Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 -1986).

Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:

With SWAPE, Matt's responsibilities have included:
• Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 300 environmental impact reports and negative declarations since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
• Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at more than 100 industrial facilities.
• Expert witness on numerous cases including, for example, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) contamination of groundwater, MTBE litigation, air toxins at hazards at a school, CERCLA compliance in assessment and remediation, and industrial stormwater contamination. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells.
• Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California.

With Komex H20 Science Inc., Matt's duties included the following:
• Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York.
• Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production-related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi-volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with^ clients and regulators.

Executive Director:

As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses. Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.

Hydrogeology:

As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
• Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
• Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases.
• Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.

At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine tiie vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a CIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.

As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
• Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water.
• Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned abou t the impact of designation. ^
• Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.

Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wrote "part B" permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.

EPA legal counsel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor's investigations of waste sites.

With the National Park Service, Matt directed service-wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed-scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
• Identified high-levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlc.rate Steering Corrunittee, a national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
• Co-authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi-Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.

Policy:

Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9.

Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
• Shaped EPA's national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication. Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
• Improved the technical training of EPA's scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region's 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific principles intathe policy-making process.
• Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents.

Geology:

With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
• Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability.
• Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
• Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon.

As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
• Supervised year-long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests.
• Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.

Teaching:

From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
• At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.
• Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.

Matt is currently a part time geology instructor at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California where he taught from 2010 to 2014 and in 2017.

Invited Testimony. Reports. Papers and Presentations:

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon,
Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.

EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.

Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorat'e Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NY (served on conference organizing committee).

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.

Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.

Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter-Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.

Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.

Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential Water Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concems Related to Personal Watercr^t Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.

Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.

Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.

Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP-61.

Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup at Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, Califomia Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.

Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPLcontaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.

Other Experience:

Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examinations, 2009-2011.

Attachment E
SWAPE
Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and
Litigation Support for the Environment

SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310)452-5555
Fax: (310)452-5550
Email: [email protected]
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Principal Environmental Chemist
Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling
Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist
Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.

M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.

B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment.

Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years' experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.

Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, industrial, military and agricultural sources, unconventional oil drilling operations, and locomotive and construction engines. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities. Dr. Rosenfeld has also successfully modeled exposure to contaminants distributed by water systems and via vapor intrusion.

Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and fiirans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, creosote, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at sites and has testified as an expert witness on numerous cases involving exposure to soil, water and air contaminants from industrial, railroad, agricultural, and military sources.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 10 October 2021
Professional History:

Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 - 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 - 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USES, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist Publications:

Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48 Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342
Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632.

Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.

Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113-125.

Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Po//«r/o«. 123 (17), 319-327.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 10 October 2021
Tarn L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70,002252-002255.

Tarn L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust; A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530.

Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.

Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.

Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.

Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet l.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.

Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, l.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation's Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, l.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet l.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofllter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS-6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal ofEnvironmental Quality. 29,1662-1668.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73,388-393.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.

Water Environment Research. 131(1 -4), 247-262.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 10 October 2021
Chollack,.T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users.

Net^vork,li\).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.

Presentations;
Rosenfeld, P.E., "The science for Perfluorinated Chemicals (PFAS): What makes remediation so hard?" Law Seminars International, (May 9-10,2018) 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 101 Seattle, WA.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.

Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld,' P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water.

Urban Environmental'f^ollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meetings Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States" Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds.. Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.

Rosenfeld,. P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From .A Releasing' Facility. The 2S"' Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A"' Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23"^ Annual International Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 10 October 2021
Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23'^ Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for .Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 - 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants - DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

Mealey's C8/PF0A. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey's Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference.

Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maiyland.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantifled Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting, of the American Groundwater Trust.

Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 10 — October 2021
Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. i Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.>.

Drycleaner Symposium: California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh:

International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (Februaiy 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUBA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.

Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and .Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration;-;...-.- Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington.. ■ ; Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14,2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation I2th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil' Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah. v r Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from • Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington, - f Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 10 October 2021
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification,, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Teaching Experience:

UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.

National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.

National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superflind and RCRA sites.

California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.

UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. "Seminar oir'Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.

University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.

U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.

Academic Grants Awarded;
California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.

Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.

Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.

Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.

King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington. State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.

James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 10 October 2021
United State Forest Service, Tahoe >iational Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.

Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993
Deposition and/or Trial Testimony;
In the Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al.. Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition, 5-14-2021
Trial, October 8-4-2021
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Rafferty, Plaintiff vs. Consolidated Rail Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation d'b/a AMTRAK,
Case No.: No. 18-L-6845
Rosenfeld Deposition, 6-28-2021
In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Illinois Theresa Romcoe, Plaintiff vs. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation d/b/a METRA Rail, Defendants
Case No.: No. 17-cv-85I7
Rosenfeld Deposition, 5-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of Arizona In and For the Cunty of Maricopa Mary Tryon et al., Plaintiff vs. The City of Pheonix v. Cox Cactus Farm, L.L.C., Utah Shelter Systems, Inc.

Case Number CV20127-094749
Rosenfeld Deposition: 5-7-2021
In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Beaumont Division Robinson, Jeremy et al Plaintiffs, vs. CNA Insurance Company et al.

Case Number l:17-cv-000508
Rosenfeld Deposition: 3-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Gary Gamer, Personal Representative for the Estate of Melvin Gamer vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. 1720288
Rosenfeld Deposition 2-23-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of Califomia, County of Los Angeles, Spring Street Courthouse Benny M Rodriguez vs. Union Pacific Railroad, A Corporation, et al.

Case No. 18STCV0II62
Rosenfeld Deposition 12-23-2020
In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri
Karen Comwell, Plaintiff, vs. Marathon Petroleum, LP, Defendant.

CaseNo.: I7I6-CV10006
Rosenfeld Deposition. 8-30-2019
In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al. Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.

Case No.: 2:17-cv-Ol 624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition. 6-7-2019
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 10 October 2021
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk, Plaintiffs, vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS "Conti Perdido' Defendant.

Case No.: 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237 Rosenfeld Deposition. 5-9-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles - Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants CaseNo.:No.BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition, I-26-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles - Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al.. Defendants Case No.: No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition, 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19
In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiff vs. The 3M Company et al.. Defendants Case No.: l:I6-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition, 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018
In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, I n**" Judicial District Phillip Bales et al.. Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al.. Defendants Cause No.: 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-17-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa ;:Simons et al.. Plaintiffs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No CI2-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-20-2017
In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al.. Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-23-2017
In United States District Court For The Southern District of Mississippi Guy Manuel vs. The BP Exploration et al.. Defendants
Case: No l:19-cv-00315-RHW
Rosenfeld Deposition, 4-22-2020
In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warm Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No.: LC102019(c/wBC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018
In the Northem District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al.. Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al.. Defendants Case Number: 4:16-CV-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2017
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 10 October 2021
In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al.. Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial, March 2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al.. Defendants Case No.:RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition, September 2015
In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winbum, et al.. Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al.. Defendants Case No.:LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.

Civil Action NO. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition, June 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition: May 2015
In the Circuit Court of the 17"' Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.

Case Number CACE07030358 (26) -
Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2014
In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al. Defendant.

Case Number cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al.. Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al.. Defendants Case Number: 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons, w/ 2009 CV 10 0987) Rosenfeld Deposition: October 2012
In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northem Division James K. Benefield, et al.. Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, Defendant.

Civil Action Number 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2010, June 2011
In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama
Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076
Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2010
In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al.. Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al.. Defendants.

Case Number 2:07CV1052
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2009
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 10 October 2021
Attachment 9
CAO Letter to GK Law
Dated 7.7.22
Laurence S. Wiener
City Attorney
II&GII..

IM
Jordan R. Sisson
GK Law
801 South Grand Avenue, 11th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
jordan(gideonlaw.net
Mr. Sisson:

July 7, 2022
Re: Appeal of Planning Commission actions regarding Cheval Blanc Hotel ProjectThe City of Beverly Hills has received the appeal petition filed on June 23, 2022, in whichUNITE HERE Local 11 purports to appeal various actions taken by the City’s Planning Commission on June 13, 2022, relating to the Cheval Blanc Specific Plan/Hotel project.

Specifically, your appeal letter indicates that the following actions are appealed:

1. Resolution recommending certification of the Project’s Environmental Impact Report (i.e., SCH No. 2020110223) (“EIR”)

2. Resolution recommending approval of General Plan Amendment, Master Plan of Streets Amendment, Zone Text Amendment, and Zone Map Amendment to establish the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Specific Plan;

3. Resolution recommending adoption of the Specific Plan and associated encroachment permits; and

4. Resolution conditionally approving Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82872 (“VTPM”), contingent on the City Council’s approval ofthe rest of the requested Project entitlements.

As a preliminary matter, and as acknowledged in the appeal letter, the Planning Commission actions as to the a) certification of the EIR, b) General Plan Amendment, c) Master Plan of Streets Amendment, d) Zone Text Amendment, e) Zone Map Amendment, f) Specific Plan and encroachment permits are recommendations to the City Council. Thus, these recommendationsare not final actions subject to appeal, and each of those matters will be presented to the CityCouncil for consideration at one or more future public hearings.

City ofBeverly Hills 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, California 90210 t(31o) 285-1055 J(31o) 285-1056 BeverlyHills.org Jordan R. Sisson
July 7, 2022

Page 2 ends

The Planning Commission’s contingent action to conditionally approve Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 82872 is, however, appealable to the City Council. As you surely can appreciate, the City Council can not undertake meaningful consideration of the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map appeal without also considering the EIR, Specific Plan, and other related entitlements. Thus, the City intends to present the appeal to the City Council when the overall Cheval Blanc SpecificPlan project is presented to the City Council in September 2022. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66451 .1, the project applicant has agreed, as set forth in the attached letter, to extend the time limits in Section 66452.5(d)(1) for when appeal hearings are to be held in order to allow fora complete project presentation in September. Further, the City Council will consider consenting to the time extension at its July 19, 2022 City Council meeting.

Separate notice of the specific hearing date or dates in September, 2022 will be provided.

Should you have any questions regarding the processing of the appeal, please let us know.

Very truly yours,
WAAAJ
David M. Snow
Assistant City Attorney
Attachment(s)Cc: Ryan Gohlich, AICP, Director of Community Development Masa Alkire, AICP, Project Manager
Laurence Wiener, City Attorney
Deborah Quick, Applicant’s Counsel
B0785-l 673\2688733v2.doc
DocuSign Envelope ID: B20332DA-862C-473C-B759-8897E81 34E47 LVMH
MOET HENNESSY. LOUIS VUI1TON
June 30, 2022VIA EMAILMr. Masa AlkireProject ManagerCity of Beverly Hills 455 N. Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210Re: Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills (PL2000138) Dear Mr. Alkire:
468 N RODEO DRIVE LLC, 456 N RODEO DRIVE LLC, 461 N BEVERLY DRIVE LLC, and 449 N BEVERLY DRIVE LLC are the owners of the properties that are the subjects of the above-referenced Planning file and, with LVMH Hospitality, are the Applicants to the City of Beverly Hills (the “City”) for certification of a Final Environmental Impact Report and approval of a General Plan Amendment, Zone Textand Map Amendments, the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Specific Plan, a Master Plan of Streets Amendment, Encroachment Permits, a Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and a Development Agreement (collectively, the “Cheval Blanc Entitlements”). The applicantsare affiliates of LVMH MOET HENNESSY LOUIS VUITTON INC. (“LVMH”).

I write to you regarding the administrative appeal filed by UNITE HERE Local 11 on June 23, 2022, challenging the Planning Commission’s June 13, 2022 conditional approval of the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map (the “Appeal”). LVMH understands that itis the City’s longstanding policy that City Council hearings on major development applications are not held during the months of July or August. Therefore, on behalf of the Applicants, LVMH agrees with the City to extend the time limit for a hearing on the Appeal pursuant to Government Code Section 66451 .1(a). In addition, this extension will allow the appeal to be heard by the Council in September 2022, when all of the Cheval Blanc Entitlements are before that body.

Sincerely,LVMH MOET HENNESSY LOUIS VUITTON INC.
ç—DocuSigned by:

BF7OBe5429A34EB..

Anish Melwani
Chief Executive Officer
cc: Dennis Ferrazzano, Esq.

Deborah E. Quick, Esq.
19 EAST 57TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10022
Attachment 10
Public Correspondence
Received since March 2022
(earlier correspondence in FEIR)
September 12, 2002
Masa Alkire
AICP, Principal Planner
City of Beverly Hills Community Development Department
455 N. Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Dear Mr. Alkire,
Beverly Hills is incredibly lucky to be the chosen site of the first Cheval Blanc hotel in North America. This past year, Barry and I had the pleasure to visit and dine at the beautiful and delicious Le Tout Paris restaurant at the Cheval Blanc Paris. Some months later I had the good fortune to stay at Cheval Blanc Paris and was able to fully appreciate the timeless design, impeccable service, and beautiful artwork that Cheval Blanc delivers.

Barry and I are both very active in the Beverly Hills community, with current and past positions on the Fine Art Commission, Design Review Commission, the Public Works Commission and as Director of the MWD for the City of Beverly Hills. Beverly Hills is our home and we love it! The Cheval Blanc hotel will add to the wonderful features that Beverly Hills has to offer including original artwork, gourmet restaurants and flagship retail. We welcome this hotel with open arms.

We appreciate the thorough process and due diligence performed by the Planning Commission on the project. This project is now ready for approval by the City Council.

Sincerely,
Sandy and Dr Barry D. Pressman
From: Jean Marks
To: Masa Alkire
Subject: Jeanne Marks, in favor of Cheval Blanc
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2022 4:20:03 PM
CAUTION: External Sender
Use caution when clicking links or opening attachments
Masa Alkire, AICP, Principal Planner
City of Beverly Hills Community Development Departmentmas 455 N Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Dear Mr. Alkire:

I am an active Beverly Hills resident who is very invested in the well-being of our community, which I love. I believe the Cheval Blanc project will be a wonderful investment in the city that will strengthen Rodeo Drive and generate significant investment, great new businesses, and worldclass design. This project will be a huge benefit to the city, and I sincerely hope that it is approved.

I appreciate that the hotel has only 109 rooms and does not include any large event spaces. This is excellent for the residents, especially us North- enders .

While small in size, I imagine it will still create substantial tax revenue for the city as well as quality jobs. My late husband Don Reynolds and I always supported hotel growth as it provides great tax revenue for the city; we openly supported the Peninsula Hotel and then The Montage. It just makes financial sense and lends an international feel to our City.

Plus, the location at the north end of Rodeo Drive will encourage walking and improve the liveliness of the area. It will provide an environmentally friendly full circle experience for those staying there,( a bonus is little need for cars in our business triangle); a beautiful place to stay, walking distance to shopping and eating in our city.

I heartily endorse this opportunity. Please say yes to the Cheval Blanc! Sincerely,
Jeanne S. Marks
1 300 Corporate Pointe, Suite 470, Culver City, CA 90230 T: (310) 473-6508 | www.koacorp.com

MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO LA QUINTA CULVER CITY

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Date: June 13, 2022
To: Masa Alkire, Principal Planner – City of Beverly Hills Community Development Department From: Diana Skidmore, Senior Project Director – KOA Corporation Subject: Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Specific Plan Project – Conditions of Approval Review Comments KOA Corporation has reviewed the Conditions of Approval included as Exhibit D of Attachment C of the June 13, 2022 Planning Commission Report for the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Specific Plan project. On behalf of our Client, Hermès of Paris, we are providing for the Planning Commission’s consideration comments in the form a redline mark-up of select transportation- and parking-related conditions (please see Attachment A).

ATTACHMENT A

KOA CORPORATION COMMENTS ON CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
5 Applicant shall enter into an encroachment agreement with the City to allow the landscaping and special paving to be located within the City’s rights-of-way surrounding the Project Site.

18. Right-of-Way Maintenance. The Applicant shall be responsible for the maintenance of the sidewalks, parkways, street trees and other landscaping, including irrigation, within and along the public rights-of-way adjacent to the Project Site along Rodeo Drive, South Santa Monica Boulevard, and Beverly Drive, including the area adjacent to the relocated alley.

19. Public Easement for Relocated Alley. The Final Vesting Parcel Map shall dedicate to the City an easement for the relocated alley, which easement shall grant public use of the relocated alley area for public street and/or alley and public utility purposes (the “Relocated Alley Easement”). The legal description of the three dimensional space of the Relocated Alley Easement shall include the space extending between the bottom of the building area constructed above the easement area at the top, and the top of the structure below the surface of the alley that is constructed for the subterranean portion of the hotel building. A vault for public utility use between the alley surface and the top of the structure below the surface alley that is constructed for the subterranean portion of the hotel building, with dimensions authorized by the Public Works Director, shall be included in the easement area. The easement shall also provide that the Relocated Alley Easement area cannot be closed, blocked, or otherwise rendered unusable, on either a temporary or permanent basis, by any person or entity other than the City of Beverly Hills without the express prior approval of the Public Works Director.

20. Public Alley Signage. The North Beverly Drive entrance to the alley shall be appropriately marked by “blade” style signage that indicates the entrance to the public alley 225
irrevocable per CaMUTCD standards
6 and the direction of travel on the public alley. The size and location of signage requires review and approval by the Public Works Director and Community Development Director, and shall include the City logo to indicate that it is a public alley.

21. Public Alley ‘Stopping Prohibited’ Lane Marking and Signage. Prior to the opening of the relocated alley for public use, the pavement of the alley shall be painted to state ‘Stopping Prohibited’. In addition, ‘Stopping Prohibited’ signage shall be installed on the wall of the Project’s vehicle ramp to the subterranean parking located adjacent to the relocated alley.

The location and size of the lane markings and signage shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director and Public Works Director.

22. Existing In-Alley Loading Zone Modification. Prior to the opening of the relocated alley for public use, the Applicant shall provide the Public Works Director a report prepared by a traffic engineer evaluating whether the location of the existing loading zone painted in the alley right-of-way adjacent to 437-447 North Beverly Drive conflicts with left turn vehicle movements from the relocated alley segment onto the existing north-south alley. Upon review of this information, the Public Works Director may require modification of the loading zone.

The Applicant shall pay for any modifications to this loading zone required by the Public Works Director.

23. Install Cameras to Monitor Alley. Security cameras shall be installed to monitor vehicle operations in the relocated portion of the alley located under the Project building and the access point to the Project’s at-grade loading facility. The locations of cameras shall be subject to Community Development Director review and approval. The camera feed shall be provided to a hotel security room and monitored by building security staff to the extent feasible.

If a vehicle violates the prohibition on stopping in the relocated portion of the alley located 226
per CaMUTCD standards
Any modification to the loading zone shall not negatively impact or impair the loading operations and capabilities of adjacent merchants. per CaMUTCD standards
The markings and signage shall be
refreshed and maintained.
7 under the Project building and the access point to the Project’s at-grade loading facility, building security shall inform the vehicle driver of the prohibition and/or contact the Beverly Hills Police Department to enforce this traffic regulation.

24. South Facing Ground Floor Pedestrian Entrance Restrictions. Pedestrian entrances on the ground floor of the building that face south and are adjacent to the relocated alley shall be limited to employee entrances only and shall remain locked with access allowed only to employees. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, signage indicating that these doors are employee entrances only and no deliveries are allowed shall be installed. This restriction does not apply to openings associated with the building’s at-grade loading facility.

25. Future modification of Alley Direction of Travel. If a request to change the direction of travel on the alley adjacent to the project is authorized by the City (subject to Public Works Department – Transportation Division and Traffic and Parking Commission review and City Council approval) in the future, Project Condition 20 shall no longer be applicable. A future approval to reverse alley traffic flow should include: clear physical partition between eastbound vehicles using the alley and westbound vehicles entering the parking structure; appropriate wayfinding signage for the alley and for the Project’s parking structure; signage per CaMUTCD clearly indicating “DO NOT ENTER/WRONG WAY” so that westbound vehicles do not enter the eastbound alley; and striping to avoid wrong way vehicle traffic entering the alley from North Beverly Drive. The requestor of the alley directional change shall be responsible for submittal of a traffic analysis that fully evaluates whether a left turn from a North Beverly Drive exit should be prohibited.

26. Loading Scheduling System and Loading Review. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the Applicant shall provide to the Community Development Director 227
Video footage of camera recordings shall be retained for a minimum of 60 days, and be available upon request by
either the City or land owners/tenants along both sides of the alley. The camera feed shall also be provided to the City for review at its Traffic Management Center (TMC). 8 information regarding the delivery scheduling system that will be used for the Project’s two ground level loading bays. If the City receives complaints regarding the alley operation after the Project begins operation, the Director may require the Applicant to provide an upcoming delivery schedule and City Staff may monitor the site for compliance with the schedule, with all costs of the monitoring paid for by the Applicant. If deliveries deviate from the schedule or unauthorized locations are used by delivery vehicles, including but not limited to the relocated alley segment, the Community Development Director may choose to schedule a public hearing so that the Planning Commission may consider additional delivery restrictions for the Project.

27. Retail In Lieu Parking. Customers accessing the Project’s Rodeo Drive retail stores are prohibited from using valet services located in the Project’s motor court or using the Project’s motor court for pick-up or drop-off by ride-share, taxi, private vehicle or other mode without using valet service. Retail customer parking will be provided through participation in the in lieu parking program, except as provided for in Project Condition 28. The Project is subject to the Rodeo Drive retail rate for the required in lieu parking spaces (the per space rate at time of payment is applicable, currently the fee is $51,674.00 per space). The project requires 33 in lieu parking spaces. Payment of the Rodeo Drive rate for 28 in lieu spaces is required as 5 in lieu retail parking spaces for retail uses have been previously purchased for the Project site. Upon the request of the Community Development Director, valet parking information shall be provided to the City to verify compliance with this condition.

28. Retail Very Important Person/Client (VIP-VIC) Parking. At any one time, up to 15 VIP-VIC retail customer vehicles may directly access the subterranean parking structure on a shopping by appointment basis. These VIP-VIC retail customer vehicles are prohibited from using the Project’s motor court valet service or using the Project’s motor court for pick-up or 228
and physical mitigations to the alley
If the Community Development Director determines that insufficient in-lieu parking has been allocated for the Project, the City may require additional in-lieu parking spaces to accommodate the Project demand for the the retail use. 9 drop-off by ride-share, taxi, private vehicle or other mode without using valet service. In addition, VIP-VIC retail customer vehicles may not enter the hotel motor court for retail customer drop-off or pick-up. The entry of VIP-VIC retail customer vehicles into the secured underground parking shall be facilitated during retail business hours by security personnel stationed on the ground floor security room located on the southern end of the building.

29. Valet Parking for Club Use. Valet parking services for club members and guests of club members shall be located at a curbside location on North Beverly Drive near the ground floor entrance into the members’ club lobby. The configuration and location of the curbside valet location is subject to Community Development Director and Public Works Director review and approval prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the building. Club members and their guests are prohibited from using the valet parking service located in the Project’s motor court or using the Project’s motor court for pick-up or drop-off by ride-share, taxi, private vehicle or other mode without using valet service.

30. Club Member Self-Parking. All club members shall be offered a self-parking option to access the Project’s subterranean parking structure. The provided self-parking access shall be key card controlled.

31. Valet Access Only Signage. Signs shall be installed indicating that the on-site valet vehicle return lane with access into the hotel motor court shall be used by valet staff only. VIPVIC retail customers and self-parking club members shall use the public alley to exit the site.

32. Final Valet Parking Plan. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the Developer shall submit a final version of the valet parking plan for Community Development Director and Public Works Director review and approval. The final valet parking plan shall include information on the number of valet attendants that will be on duty at any given time, 229
Valets serving club members shall not use the public alley for vehicle circulation during pick-ups.
10 the standard operating procedures for staging of limousines, ride share vehicles, car service vehicles, and taxis, and any other information deemed necessary by the Directors. The valet parking plan shall provide operational information for both the valet service within the Project’s motor court and the valet operations located on North Beverly Drive for the club use.

33. Left Turns into Motor Court Entrance Prohibited. Left turns from westbound South Santa Monica Boulevard to the Project motor court entrance are prohibited. The Applicant shall have a traffic engineer design measures that could include, but are not limited to, signage, lane markings, and/or physical barriers to restrict the prohibited left turn movement. The design measures shall be subject to Public Works Director review and approval. The Applicant is responsible for the full cost of installing these measures. The measures shall be installed prior to certificate of occupancy.

34. Motor Court Exit Signage and Lane Markings. “Right Turn Only” signage and “Keep Clear” lane markings must be installed in the eastbound lanes of South Santa Monica Boulevard at the motor court exit prior to certificate of occupancy. The design and location of the “Right Turn Only” signage and “Keep Clear” lane markings are subject to review and approval of the Public Works Director prior to installation. The Applicant is responsible for the costs of signage and lane markings.

35. On-Street Loading and Delivery. On-street loading and delivery for any use on the Project Site is prohibited on North Rodeo Drive, South Santa Monica Boulevard or in the alley adjacent to the Project. Subject to Public Works Director and Community Development Director review and approval, short-term deliveries may occur in the North Beverly Drive curbside area adjacent to the ground floor private club entrance during limited times approved in the Project’s valet parking management plan. If approved by the Directors, the allowed time 230
per CaMUTCD standards that may
11 period and allowed parking duration for short-term deliveries shall be indicated on signage located on North Beverly Drive.

36. Unanticipated Traffic, Loading, or Parking Impacts. In the event that the Community Development Director determines that operation of the Project is having unanticipated traffic, loading, and/or parking impacts, the Director shall require the Applicant to provide an analysis of the traffic, loading, and/or parking impacts. After review of the additional analysis, the Director may recommend the implementation of additional conditions to mitigate the impacts or schedule a hearing before the Planning Commission concerning the unanticipated traffic, loading, or parking impacts being caused by the Project. At least twenty days prior to such hearing, notice shall be posted on the site; mailed to all property owners and residential occupants within 1,000 feet of the project site, plus blockface; and shall be published in two newspapers of local circulation. Additionally, the Applicant shall receive at least twenty days’ notice of such hearing. Upon conclusion of the hearing, the Planning Commission may impose additional conditions upon the Project as necessary to mitigate any unanticipated traffic, loading, and/or parking impacts caused by the Project, and the Applicant shall forthwith comply with any such additional conditions at their sole expense. However, the owner(s), Applicant, or hotel operator(s), may appeal the decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council pursuant to the provisions of the Beverly Hills Municipal Code and any decision of the Planning Commission shall be stayed pending a decision by the City Council on appeal.

37. Green Building Design. The building shall be constructed to meet or exceed LEED® Gold certification or equivalent. A green building plan shall be submitted as part of the application for a building permit. The green building plan shall indicate which LEED® 231
12 checklist items the project will utilize, and indicate where compliance with each selected point is shown on the plans. The Developer shall be required to implement all points shown in the final green building plan. The Building Official or their designee shall verify compliance with each selected point prior to issuance of a final certificate of occupancy. The Building Official may conduct other inspections as needed to ensure compliance with this condition. The Developer may request amendment of the green building plan and such amendment may be approved by the Building Official, provided that the LEED® Gold certification or equivalent is maintained.

Other City Departments’ Requirements

38. The Developer shall comply with all applicable conditions and permits required from the Public Works Department and Community Services-Recreation and Parks Department attached as Exhibit A. The Developer shall secure all necessary permits from the Engineering Division of Public Works prior to commencement of any demolition or Project related work.

39. The Project shall comply with all applicable conditions from the Fire Department as may be identified through the plan check process.

Construction Management

40. Prior to issuance of a demolition or grading permit, the Developer shall submit a Construction Management Plan satisfactory to the Community Development Director and the Building Official. The Construction Management Plan shall incorporate the Construction Traffic Management Plan (TRA-MM-1) and the Construction Workers Parking Plan (TRAMM-2) as described in the attached Mitigation Measures for the Project. The Construction Management Plan shall also include, at a minimum, the following requirements:
232
13 a. A map identifying routes and the locations of off-site construction worker parking lots to be utilized shall be provided to the City and include written certification from the owner(s) of the parking lots proposed to be used that such parking will be available to the Developer for the duration of the construction period during which off-site parking is necessary.
b. All final construction mitigation measures in the Final Environmental Impact Report. c. A construction phasing and timing plan for the Project, and implementation plan for each phase of construction (demolition, excavation, concrete, superstructure, etc). d. Specification that hauling of debris and/or soil from the site shall be allowed to take place at night and/or weekends as approved by the Director of Community Development in accordance with an after-hours work permit (BHMC Section 5- 1206).
e. Requirements for measures such as a sign-in/sign-out requirement for all persons accessing and leaving the site, defined separations between public and construction areas, fencing and/or landscape barriers, active surveillance, privacy screening, and other similar measures to prevent unauthorized access between such areas. f. Information clearly identifying the usage of cranes and other heavy equipment. g. A provision prohibiting construction trucks from queuing on South Santa Monica Boulevard or North Rodeo Drive during all aspects of construction, with the exception that trucks may queue on these streets in locations and during timeframes as may be authorized by the Building Official as part of a night-time construction permit.
233
h. A 24-hour hot line shall be established so that members of the public can contact the City directly regarding construction complaints or emergency situations. 14 41. Temporary Placement of Construction Equipment. City Traffic Engineer review and approval is required for all temporary placements of construction equipment in the alley.

42. Alley Closure Limitations during Project Construction. During construction, when the relocated alley becomes operational to public traffic, alley closures shall not occur earlier than 10 PM or later than 8 AM, except in the case of emergency closure. Any alley closure requires approval of the Public Works Director.

43. Alley Closure Notifications. The Applicant shall notify tenants and property owners on the west side of the 400 block of North Beverly Drive and east side of the 400 block of North Rodeo Drive of any construction related full or partial alley closure at least seven (7) days prior to the alley closure. Proof of this notification shall be provided to the Community Development Director.

44. Construction Schedule Website. The Applicant shall maintain a publicly accessible website with a current construction schedule. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the website address must be provided to tenants and property owners on the west side of the 400 block of North Beverly Drive and east side of the 400 block of North Rodeo Drive and posted at a publicly visible location on the Project Site.

45. A cash deposit of $25,000 shall be deposited with the City to ensure compliance with the conditions of this Resolution regarding construction activities. The $25,000 deposit shall be replenished as deemed necessary by the City’s Building Official. Such deposit shall be returned to Developer upon completion of all construction activities and in the event that no more than two violations of such conditions or the Beverly Hills Municipal Code occur. In the event that three or more such violations occur, the City may: (a) retain the deposit to cover costs of enforcement; (b) notify the Developer that the Developer may request a hearing before 234
7 prior by locations on all four sides of
Memorandum
To: The City of Beverly Hills
From: The Wallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts Re: Cheval Blanc
The Wallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts, a public-private partnership with The City of Beverly Hills, dynamic cultural hub, and longstanding community resource lends its support to the proposed Cheval Blanc project.

As The Wallis rebounds from the COVID-19 pandemic and looks toward rebuilding and expanding its vibrant national and international audience, which seeks world-class arts and culture programming, we know we will see enormous benefit from the presence of Cheval Blanc in our immediate vicinity. We share key institutional values with LVMH, including creativity and innovation, which are foundational to the work we do at The Wallis.

We fervently believe that welcoming Cheval Blanc to our community will inspire growth, cultural exchange, and social vibrancy; and will have a positive impact on both The Wallis, and the community writ large.

We would be so grateful to have our comments on this proposition read during this evening’s meeting.

Thank you,
Rachel Fine
Executive Director & CEO; The Wallis
From: Cindy Gordon
To: Masa Alkire
Subject: FW: Hotel on South Santa Monica Between Rodeo and Beverly Drives Date: Thursday, May 26, 2022 12:34:30 PM
From: Steve Stabler <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2022 12:34 PM
To: CommentPC <[email protected]>
Subject: Hotel on South Santa Monica Between Rodeo and Beverly Drives CAUTION: External Sender
Use caution when clicking links or opening attachments
I live on North Beverly Drive and would like to voice my strenuous objection to the proposed height of this hotel along Beverly Drive. The concept of a three or four story village is what I believe the great majority of Beverly Hills residents are in favor of for Beverly and Rodeo Drives. A nine story building just across the street from a much earlier approved nine story building creates a wind tunnel effect, blocks light and is not in keeping with the best interests of our city's residents. Please do not do this in an effort to drive more income to our city.

Steve Stabler
Commotion Pictures, Inc.

Direct: +1-310-273-1600
Cheval Blanc Planning Commission Special Meeting– May 26, 2022 - Good evening. My name is Samantha Petersen. I’m the Managing Director for the Hermès of Paris Rodeo Drive boutique.
- We want to thank the commissioners and city staff and recognize the many hours they have devoted to our expressed concerns about alley reconfiguration. We are grateful for the support shown by the Commissioners. They have listened thoughtfully to our concerns regarding Applicant’s proposed reconfiguration of the public alley which is – and has been for years - crucial to the operations of our store and other retailers on Rodeo Drive. - To repeat -- in concept we do not oppose the Hotel and even welcome it as it may boost our business. We only ask that concerns about the reconfiguration and operations of public alley be addressed to everyone’s satisfaction not just Applicant. - After the February hearing we reached out to Applicant as directed by the commissioners to engage in good faith negotiations to resolve outstanding alley operational issues. Once again, Applicant refused to engage with us. When we asked them to provide a preview of the redesigned plans so we could anticipate if their changes would address our concerns, Applicant said no.
- We also want to make clear that Hermes fully intends to move forward with a proposal to reverse the direction of the alley. We plan to provide an analysis of operations and traffic and engage in review process as recommended by staff.
- We paused our outreach to other alley users when Applicant said it was revising its plans. We wanted to be sure there were no changes that would impact the reversal and waste time of our neighbors and the commission.
- Over these many months Applicant has shown time and again that it will not partner with us to address our alley concerns. This is why we must continue to advocate for our positions in front of the commission. We stand ready to work together with Applicant but if history is any indication, Applicant will not work with us.
- While we thank the staff for incorporating some of our requests into the Draft Conditions of Approval, there are a few key conditions that have not been addressed that we feel strongly should be included:
- We request the following:
o That reversing direction of alley be studied early in the project approval process and make it a condition to approval of the project. Studying both at same time is the most efficient way to address all issues in a coherent and comprehensive manner. o that Applicant support the alley reversal as they have stated they would in the past.

Applicant does not want to make alley reversal part of their project and puts the burden on Hermes and other retailers to manage the process so we are requesting Applicant’s support here.
o that the east/west alley segment be widened for the entire width and the corner be increased at the southeast corner of the 90-degree bend in the alley. These requests stand whether alley is reversed or not and are further explained by our traffic consultant.
o that no changes be made to existing alley loading zones that serve retailers. We believe the conditions proposed by Applicant are inadequate and will cause detrimental effects to our business operations. Should the hotel impact existing loading zones it will interfere with our ability to load merchandise into the store and ship merchandise to our clients.
- We also want to thank the staff for incorporating conditions specific to construction of the project. However, a few key conditions we feel strongly should be included during what is sure to be a 3 year plus construction period. We request the following:
o that the construction relations officer be on site during construction. It’s very important to have a person who is readily accessible with authority to address retailers concerns immediately without retailers having to track them down by phone or email. o that retailers be made aware promptly of any complaints and construction issues raised during construction that potentially impact other retail operations on 400 block of Rodeo Drive.
o That retailers receive notice of any construction meetings and given the opportunity to voice concerns.
o That Applicant maintain a master schedule of special events provided by Rodeo Drive retailers and stop construction during those events. We have approximately 10 events per year at the boutique ranging in size from 50 to 200 people. Events occur during the daytime and nighttime hours and may go after 10 pm. These events are very important to our business and attended by some of our most important clients. - We have nothing against the hotel. We are simply trying to protect safety and security of our staff, clients and preserve access to the public alley which has served as the lifeline for our longstanding business operations for decades.

Respectfully, we request that the Commission adopt our positions as solutions to the issues raised above and by our consultants submitted on behalf of Hermes.

As always, we thank you for your time and attention.
1 300 Corporate Pointe, Suite 470, Culver City, CA 90230 T: (310) 473-6508 | www.koacorp.com

MONTEREY PARK ORANGE ONTARIO SAN DIEGO LA QUINTA CULVER CITY

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Date: May 25, 2022
To: Masa Alkire, Principal Planner – City of Beverly Hills Community Development Department From: Ryan Kelly, Senior Engineer – KOA Corporation
Subject: Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Specific Plan Project – Transportation and Parking Review Comments for May 2022 Resubmittal Materials
KOA Corporation (KOA) has reviewed the transportation and parking analyses included as part of the recent resubmittal materials provided for the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Specific Plan project (the “Project”). Our review focused on the adequacy and completeness of the following updated and new transportation and parking analyses conducted for the Project:
 Revised Conceptual Plans (April 20, 2022) [Attachment U of Planning Commission Report]  Updated Local Transportation Assessment (Fehr & Peers, May 2022) [Revised Appendix H.2 of EIR]  Microsimulation Traffic Study (Iteris, May 9, 2022) [Attachment L of Planning Commission Report] and Microsimulation Traffic Study – Future + Project Scenario (Iteris, May 18, 2022) [Attachment M of Planning Commission Report]
 Parking Demand Analysis Study (Kimley-Horn, May 6, 2022) [Attachment H of Planning Commission Report] and In-Lieu Parking Analysis Supplemental Memo (Kimley-Horn, May 18, 2022) [Attachment I of Planning Commission Report]
Given the limited time with which to review these materials, our review was not exhaustive. We completed our review as quickly as possible in order to provide feedback to City staff prior to the Project’s Planning Commission hearing on May 26, 2022. This technical memorandum provides a brief summary of the topics of concern related to the Project’s potential effects on local transportation operations and safety.

REVISED CONCEPTUAL PLANS
 The plans depict the east-west portion of the realigned alley with a 20-foot minimum width. The Project should widen the realigned east-west alley segment to provide at least 25 feet of width across its full length. The increased alley width is intended to (1) ease westbound-to-southbound turning movements for large commercial vehicles and emergency vehicles traversing the alley, and (2) provide sufficient width to allow large vehicles to bypass other commercial vehicles that are temporarily stopped along east-west portion of the alley. (See KOA Comment Letter dated February 10, 2022)
2  The corner clearance at the southeast corner of the 90-degree bend in the alley should be increased by 5 feet to allow large commercial and emergency vehicles to better navigate the westbound-tosouthbound turn in the alley. (See KOA Comment Letter dated February 10, 2022)  Potential reversal of the flow of traffic in the alley (from westbound-to-southbound to northboundto-eastbound) is presently being explored. The above two measures are recommended for either direction of flow along the alley to provide increased turning area at the 90-degree bend in the alley introduced by the Project.
 The plans do not address how trash pick-up will occur at the site given the trash bins are located in basement level 1. Plans presenting trash collection procedures should be prepared to ensure that 3 trash collection activities do not interfere with the operations of other businesses along the alley or impede the flow of traffic.

UPDATED LOCAL TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT
Some of the methodologies and assumptions underpinning the proposed Project transportation characteristics developed in the Updated Local Transportation Assessment (LTA) require clarification and/or revision. They include the following:

PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
 The internal capture rate for the Project’s publicly accessible restaurants during the weekday AM peak hour is extraordinarily high at 80 percent. This figure differs greatly from the 20 percent internal capture rate recommended by the Applicant in the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills – Private Membership Club and Restaurant Operations & Usage memorandum (LVMH Hotel Management, April 21, 2022) [Attachment J of Planning Commission Report]. While the justification for the high percentage is that many of the restaurant patrons will be hotel guests, the number of internally captured restaurant vehicle trips in the AM peak hour (98) greatly exceeds the number of hotel vehicle trips (53), which defies logic. The Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills – Private Membership Club and Restaurant Operations & Usage memorandum provides restaurant patron data for Cheval Blanc Paris. While this memorandum shows that 92 percent of breakfast patrons at one of the on-site restaurants are hotel guests, only 62 percent of breakfast patrons are hotel guests at the other onsite restaurant open for breakfast service. Thus, based on the data provided, the internal capture percentage for the AM peak hour does not represent a conservative condition. This elevated percentage is even more questionable when one considers that the 10,212 square feet of Project restaurant space on the 2nd and 7th floors of the Project will be reserved exclusively for hotel patrons and club members.
 The vehicle trip generation estimates for the Paley Center for Media were developed based on Land Use Code 760 - Research and Development Center, an office use contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition, 2021). However, the Paley Center operated as an institutional museum and is described as an institutional use in the Project documents. The Paley Center for Media operated from noon to 5:00 PM, Wednesday through Sunday, typical hours for a museum use. Its mischaracterization as an office use results in inflated existing use trip credits for the Project. The use of trip generation rates for ITE Land Use Code 580 – Museum would be more appropriate.
 The Project’s retail component trip generation estimates are based on Land Use Code 820 – Shopping Center (>150k) of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, which establishes trip rates based on study sites of commercial establishments planned, developed, owned, and managed as a unit with at least 150,000 square feet of gross leasable area. Given that the Project includes only 24,976 square feet of retail space, the rates for ITE Land Use Code – Strip Retail Plaza (<40k) should have been utilized, as they were developed based on study sites of commercial establishments planned, developed, owned, and managed as a unit with less than 40,000 square feet of gross leasable area.

This error results in lower estimated vehicle trips for the proposed Project.  The Project’s transit network company (TNC) trip calculations do not provide a conservative estimate of trips to and from site, as they assume that all Project patrons leaving the site via a TNC vehicle like Uber or Lyft will utilize a vehicle that just dropped someone off, and that no TNC vehicles will arrive passenger-less for pick-ups.
4 SITE ACCESS OPERATIONS
 The summary of the results of the microsimulation analysis do not agree with the findings of the Microsimulation Traffic Study and Microsimulation Traffic Study – Future + Project Scenario.

MICROSIMULATION TRAFFIC STUDY AND MICROSIMULATION TRAFFIC STUDY – FUTURE + PROJECT SCENARIO
 Although the study indicates the motor court at the Project site “generally operates well,” the Future plus Project results show that there will be an average vehicle queue spillback from the motor court entrance driveway onto eastbound South Santa Monica Boulevard of 21 feet (approximately 1 vehicle) during the PM peak hour. The maximum vehicle queue spillback onto eastbound South Santa Monica Boulevard would be 210 feet (approximately 8 to 9 vehicles). Therefore, motor court operations will regularly cause queue spillback onto South Santa Monica Boulevard, reducing the roadway’s eastbound capacity from two lanes to one lane and occasionally extending through the intersection at Rodeo Drive.
 Delay and queuing conditions under Existing and Future without Project conditions are not provided for comparison, yet there is discussion of the Project’s added queue lengths.  The microsimulation analysis does not report “worst-case” conditions, as stated, but rather evaluates the PM peak hour of adjacent street traffic on a typical weekday (Tuesday through Thursday). Vehicle trip generation estimates for the Project’s uses may be much higher during the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours of the generator (the Project land uses). Additional scenarios could have been provided for a more complete analysis.
 Valet staffing assumptions on Tuesdays and Wednesdays differ from information provided in the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Valet Parking Management Plan (LAZ Parking, revised May 6, 2022). The microsimulation analysis assumes 8 valet staff are available for retrieving and parking vehicles, while the staffing schedule from LAZ Parking shows only 7 valet staff members on-site during the PM peak hour on Tuesdays and Wednesdays.
 The study references “the 53.5 seconds of calculated delay to exit the motor court,” which does not align with the 40.0 seconds presented in Exhibit 3 for Existing plus Project conditions.  The May 9, 2022 study does not discuss or provide data that could be used to verify that the operational conditions of the microsimulation accurately represent in-field queues and delay.  Exhibit 3 in the study shows that not all vehicles are able to be served at the motor court entrance or exit during the PM peak hour. The study does not address how these unserved vehicles would affect queue lengths at the motor court entrance and exit driveways.  Vehicle queue lengths for vehicles exiting the motor court driveway (queues through the motor court and along the internal drive to the Project’s subterranean parking) are not presented in the study.
 The microsimulation analysis extents are limited and should be expanded to get a better picture of delays and queuing associated with the Project. The nearby intersections of Rodeo Drive & North Santa Monica Boulevard and Beverly Drive & North Santa Monica Boulevard are projected to operate at Level of Service (LOS) F during the PM peak hour under Future plus Project conditions, with average vehicle delays exceeding 100 seconds. The anticipated failing operations at these intersections will surely impact traffic flow along South Santa Monica Boulevard.  Have VIP/VIC operations and their potential to add to travel/service times been considered in the microsimulation analysis?
 Clarification is not provided for the travel/service times of non-hotel visitors, so it is not clear how the TNC unloading/loading service times were applied in the analysis. 5  The analysis shows that motorists exiting the motor court will experience average delays of 40.0 and 49.4 seconds turning onto eastbound South Santa Monica Boulevard in the PM peak hour under Existing plus Project and Future plus Project conditions, respectively. How are the same number of outbound vehicles (142 of 148) able to be processed under both of these conditions, given that the Future plus Project condition exiting delays are 23.5 percent higher than those in the Existing plus Project condition?
 Are the outputs/simulations available for review?

PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS STUDY

PARKING REQURIED BY CITY CODE
 A 15 percent transit credit was applied to the member’s club land use component, even though Project analyses including the Updated LTA indicate that all club members are assumed to drive alone to the Project site.
 While the Project plans to provide 24 spaces for retail employees, the parking calculations with credits indicate the maximum retail customer parking demand will be only 9.5 spaces. This retail customer/employee parking demand split is not reasonable.  Time-of-day parking factors were adjusted for the ground-floor restaurant between 6:00 AM and 10:00 AM to account for breakfast service, but no such adjustments were applied to the 6th floor restaurant factors. If the 6th floor restaurant will serve breakfast, as indicated in other Project analyses, then adjustments should be applied to this use, as well.  The reserved parking supplies for hotel employees (39 spaces), retail employees (24 spaces), and VIP-VIC customers (15 spaces) are ignored in the calculations.

PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
 Although the ground-floor and 6th floor restaurants will both be open to the general public, the base parking demand rates for the 6th floor restaurant were assumed to be approximately half of the ground-floor restaurant (using Hotel-leisure restaurant/lounge rates versus Fine/casual dining rates). The more conservative base parking demand rates should be applied to both restaurant spaces that are open to the public and require reservations, as noted in the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills – Private Membership Club and Restaurant Operations & Usage memorandum (LVMH Hotel Management, April 21, 2022).
 More supporting information should be provided and more conservative assumptions should be used in developing the Drive Ratio adjustments for the proposed Project uses, given how dramatically they reduce Project’s anticipated parking demands.  Captive Ratio adjustments for parking demands are not the same as internal capture adjustments for vehicle trips and, therefore, the Project’s internal capture worksheets provide no justification for the 20 percent captive rate.
 The ITE Internal Capture worksheets included in Appendix E contain errors. The calculations therein generate internal captured trips between the hotel use and all of the on-site restaurant space, including the 10,212 square feet of private hotel/club restaurant space on the 2nd and 7th floors.

However, based on the revised Project analysis, the vehicle trips for these private restaurants are subsumed in the hotel trip generation estimates. The internal capture assumptions in the Updated LTA are also justified based on these erroneous calculations.  The reserved parking supplies for hotel employees (39 spaces), retail employees (24 spaces), and VIP-VIC customers (15 spaces) are ignored in the calculations. 6 PARKING DEMAND FOR EVENTS
 Rental of the screening room by the public is not accounted for in event parking demand calculations.
 The reserved parking supplies for hotel employees (39 spaces), retail employees (24 spaces), and VIP-VIC customers (15 spaces) are ignored in the calculations.

ALAN
KAYE

INSURANCE
AGENCY
301 N. CANON DRIVE, SUITE 324
BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA 90210
May 20, 2022
Mr. Masa Alkire, Principal Planner
Beverly Hills Community Development Department
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Dear Mr. Alkire,
We are writing in support of the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills because we believe it will be a one -of -a -kind development that brings the best in luxury, elegance and class to our city. The proposed hotel will further elevate Beverly Hills with its spectacular design at the north end of our world renown Rodeo Drive.

The project team has done meaningful and well received outreach to members of the community, offering dozens of in -person and virtual presentations. It is clear to us that their intention was to incorporate those viewpoints and priorities into their design. On that note, when LVMH heard feedback at the Planning Commission meeting regarding traffic and other concerns, they went back to the drawing board and reworked the project to attempt to meet those needs.

The building is carefully designed to improve the pedestrian experience with ground floor retail and an upscale restaurant with indoor/ outdoor dining. The building is stepped back in a way that keeps the tallest part away from the street. This allows for better integration with the surrounding buildings in the neighborhood. In addition, it does not have any banquet or large- scale special event facilities which will help manage traffic and beyond the changes they already made at the request of the Planning Commission.

As former commissioners who also work in the City, we are excited to see this project move forward for approval.

Sine
Ian & Michelle Kaye
310. 277. 9400 800. 662. 5433 Fax 310. 282. 0775
akaye@alankayeins. com www. alankayeins. com CA Insurance License # 0465531

From: David Lewis
To: Masa Alkire
Cc: Lilly Lewis
Subject: LVHM Project - Comment
Date: Thursday, May 19, 2022 10:05:14 AM
CAUTION: External Sender
Use caution when clicking links or opening attachments
________________________________
Dear Mr. Alkire:

I'm writing on behalf of myself and my wife to give our wholehearted support for the LVMH Cheval Blanc hotel proposal. We’re also concerned that the Planning Commission has not yet approved this project. Having listened to the various lengthy hearings, we are increasingly frustrated by how slowly this process is progressing.

This project will be an enormous boon for our city; to miss this opportunity would be worse than regrettable. Of course, some concerns are to be expected, but by any measure the benefits will far outweigh any negatives. We are confident that the Planning Commission understands that, and that it will not permit minor or self-serving concerns to further delay, let alone undermine, the public progress of the project.

Given the Planning Commission’s patient and comprehensive response to the public feedback, on our own behalf and that of all Beverly Hills residents, we urge you now to approve the project without further delay.

Sincerely,
David Lewis
--
Law Office of David Lewis
1801 Century Park East, Suite 2500
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Tel: (310) 312-8077
https://smex-ctp.trendmicro.com:443/wis/clicktime/v1/query?url=www.davidlewislaw.com&umid=a04286d8-f648- 4377-8d80-af608a9235e0&auth=3bc847c8cf076bd2068ac6b1b2493cf0dc2ee171- f7edc158dae8c9cf4f270b6f986a162741629692

From: Nooshin Meshkaty
To: Masa Alkire
Cc: [email protected]; Andy Licht
Subject: Please read into the record at the Planning Commission Meeting May 26th Date: Monday, May 23, 2022 7:03:20 AM
CAUTION: External Sender
Use caution when clicking links or opening attachments
Resent with the correct email address
Mr. Masa Alkire, Principal Planner
Beverly Hills Community Development Department
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Please read into the record at the Planning Commission Meeting on May 26th Dear Chair Licht and Planning Commissioners
We believe the LVMH proposed Cheval Blanc Hotel is a one-of-a-kind opportunity for the community and we support it moving forward in the approval process.

As longtime residents and commissioners who also work in the City, we have seen firsthand how LVMH has been an outstanding, respectful, and collaborative partner for our City. They have shown that they deliver when it comes to high-end luxury properties representing brands that elevate Beverly Hills with international status.

These properties also generate significant tax revenue that helps to fund our vital city services. Cheval Blanc will be another strong investment in our community. Along with first-rate dining, retail, and public art, the world-class design of Peter Marino will bring life to a relatively underutilized area of the Golden Triangle. This project as we emerge from the pandemic couldn’t come at a better time and we enthusiastically support its approval.

Nooshin and Yar Meshkaty
From: Cindy Gordon
To: Masa Alkire
Subject: Fw: Cheval Blanc BH
Date: Monday, May 9, 2022 8:05:54 AM
From: Duke Hagenburger <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 6, 2022 8:50:59 PM
To: CommentPC
Subject: Cheval Blanc BH
CAUTION: External Sender
Use caution when clicking links or opening attachments
Hello MasaThank you for the continued contact keeping progress of the Cheval Blanc. As a neighboring business off Rodeo Dr in the ‘Golden Triangle’, we are fully supportive of this project and look forward to its approval, construction, and eventual opening. This project will be a wonderful asset to the BH luxury retail & hospitality community.

Thank you -
Duke
--
Duke Hagenburger
General Manager
ISAIA Beverly Hills
9527 Brighton Way
424.204.1169 boutique
310.709.2221 mobile
[email protected]
www.isaia.it

Masa Alkire
Senior Project Manager City of Beverly Hills -
On behalf of my clients Hermes, Chanel, and Giorgio Armani, I have been asked to communicate with you as to our desire to go forward with the alley reversal and where we stand today.

After our last hearing, and in coordination with our traffic consultant KOA, our clients had a meeting to discuss our proposal of making the alley run in a north easterly direction from Brighton Way entrance exiting easterly onto Beverly drive.

After that meeting, and discussion with the City staff, we started communicating with the other users of the alley. After that happened LVMH indicated they were redesigning their project. We felt that based upon the fact that they were redesigning their project, that we should hold off on discussing our proposal with the other users of the alley until we were able to digest and evaluate LVMH's new proposal.

We thought that this was prudent so that we could discuss both proposals at the same time with the users to get a true understanding of how the alley would function both ways.

So please understand that we are still interested in pursuing the alley reversal if it impacts our use, however, need to understand the new LVMH proposal design first.

It is for this reason that I need to know when the new LVMH plans have been submitted so that our parties and consultants can address them so that we can then reach out to the other alley users.

Hopefully, I will hear from you with adequate time to complete this study.

Further, it should be known that we have reached out to LVMH as directed and they have declined to meet and to share their design with us. We then offered to meet with them to discuss how we could address our issues as they are doing their redesign, but they have declined, as well. Their only comment to us was in a correspondence asking us if the issues we brought up were the only issues we sponse..was that we need to see the redesign before we can comment. cc: Gail Wheeler, Vice President/General Counsel, Hermes of Paris, Inc. (via email) Maryann Lawrence, Managing Counsel Legal Department USA, Chanel, Inc. (via email) Hank Rouda, Senior VP Legal Affairs/General Counsel, Giorgio Armani Corporation (via email) Law Offices of 433 N. Camden Drive, Ste. 970
Murray D. Fischer Beverly Hills, CA 90210
A Professional Corporation Telephone: (310) 276-3600
Fax: (310) 276-4345
Email: [email protected]
March 9, 2022

VIA EMAIL
Andy Licht ([email protected])
Thomas Hudnut ([email protected])
Peter Ostroff ([email protected])
Myra Demeter, Ph.D. ([email protected])
Gary Ross ([email protected])
Dear Honorable Chair, Vice Chair and Members of the Commission:

As you are aware, at the previous Planning Commission hearing on February 24, 2022 the Planning Commission requested that LVMH and the 400 block retailers, Hermes, Armani and Chanel meet in an effort to resolve open issues regarding the hotel project, specifically the traffic issues, the alley issue and the concern regarding the construction of the hotel itself, once underway. You have asked the parties to submit a formal reply by no later than March 10, 2022.

It is our understanding, and the City has confirmed, that LVMH has asked for a continuance of the matter to a date uncertain, beyond the previously scheduled March 24 Planning Commission hearing, so that LVMH can take into consideration the collective comments of the Planning Commission, the general public and the neighboring retailers expressed at the February meeting and revise their design accordingly.

Since it is unclear what that potential redesign will entail and when it will be submitted, we respectfully advise the Commission that we will withhold further public comment and temporarily suspend pursuing the potential reversal of the alley until such time as the new LVMH hotel plan is re-submitted. We reserve the right to pursue the alley reversal matter, and public comment once such re-design is received and reviewed. We further reserve our rights to pursue comments previously submitted to the commission.

Honorable Chair, Vice Chair and Members of the Commission March 9, 2022

Page 2 ends

If you wish to have further information submitted by the retailers in the interim, or a meeting either in person or by Zoom, please respond accordingly to the undersigned.

Very truly yours,
MURRAY D. FISCHER
Murray D. Fischer,
On Behalf of Chanel Inc., Hermes Paris, Giorgio Armani Corporation cc: Masa Alakire ([email protected])
Ryan Gohlich ([email protected])
David Snow ([email protected])
Gail Wheeler, Hermes ([email protected])
Hank Rouda, ([email protected])
Maryann Lawrence ([email protected])
Ryan Kelly ([email protected])
Robert Dimartini ([email protected])
Diana Skidmore ([email protected])
Deborah Quick ([email protected])
Attachment 11
CB Motor Court Study
Dated 10.19.20
AP Exhibit 3
Cheval Blanc
Motor Court/Porte Cochere Study
(October 19, 2020)

TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. INTRODUCTION………………..…………..…………………..………………………………….1
B. MOTOR COURT / PORTE COCHERE………………………………..…………………………1

1. City of Beverly Hills Municipal Code (BHMC) Requirements………………………………1

2. Empirical Data from Other Hotels and Cheval Blanc Comparison………………………...2

3. Motor Court Valet Usage……………………………………………………………………….3 Montage Hotel Observation Study
Porte Cochere Comparative Study

A. INTRODUCTION
Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills, located in the northern portion of the Business Triangle, will be a single multiple-use building including a 115-room luxury hotel with a private club, restaurant, lounge, bar, and other appurtenant uses plus ground level and second level retail. A valet motor court with its porte cochere will be used for drop-off and pick-up for hotel/club guests, restaurants and retail patrons. Valet parking and self-park employee parking will be below grade on three levels. This motor court/porte cohere study was undertaken to define the size of the motor court to support this unique luxury driven hotel project.

A separate Technical Memorandum – Parking Demand Analysis Study, dated October 19, 2020 was prepared by Kimley Horn Associates. This study projects parking demand for the Project by using two methodologies; 1) City code parking requirements and 2) Urban Land Institute Shared Parking Demand. This study provides background information with regards to drive rates to the site and helps to validate the motor court/porte cochere size.

Additionally, research of existing Beverly Hills luxury hotels was undertaken by Gruen Associates to determine the appropriate size of the motor court in relationship to room count and size of other amenities. The “Porte Cochere Comparative Use Study,” found at the end of this document, compiles information from available digital sources for other luxury Beverly Hills hotels. These exhibits provide a description of each hotel regarding site size, total area, FAR, height, land uses, and motor court capacity on the diagrams. Data in this study was drawn from publicly sourced documents available. It is possible that current conditions may vary from this data. It should be noted that both the Peninsula Hotel and the Waldorf Astoria only allow valet parking in their belowgrade parking garage which was a part of their entitlement1 . Valet only parking garages has come
to be the standard for luxury hotels in the region.

B. MOTOR COURT / PORTE COCHERE

1. City of Beverly Hills Municipal Code Requirements
a. Hotel Regulations for Amount of Parking in the Motor Court based on code.

Hotel Regulations: 10-3-2867 Hotel Access areas requires a hotel access area provided in the vicinity of the hotel and accommodating the following:
1) Four and one-half percent (4½%) of the parking required for hotel guest rooms. (For the project, 115 hotel guest room parking spaces x 4.5% = 5 spaces) 2) Four and one-half percent (4½%) of the parking required for restaurant/bar facilities including outdoor dining. (For the project, using ordinance No. 19-O2296, 59 spaces x 4.5% = 3 spaces) 3) Sixteen (16%) of the parking required for the public assembly areas. (No public assembly areas are included in the project).
4) One taxi parking space for each forty (40) hotel guestrooms. (For the project, 115 hotel guest rooms / 40 = 3 spaces).

The total spaces noted as required by code above is 12 spaces including taxis.

The regulation further allows the Planning Commission, with a conditional use 1 Waldorf Astoria Beverly Hills Parking Management Plan May 25, 2017; Resolution No. 1773, May 12, 2016
1 permit, to reduce such a requirement up to a maximum of 30%. This would result in 8 spaces total. (The Project and Specific Plan shows 9 spaces).

It should be noted that the code does not mention private club, but for the purposes of motor court parking calculations, we have assumed Four and one-half percent (4½%) of the parking required for the private club
Table 1 – Motor Court Parking Requirements
Use
Parking
Demand Motor Court Requirement
Hotel Parking 115 5.2 4.5% for motor court
Restaurant/Bar Parking
(including outdoor
dining) 72 3.2 4.5% for motor court
Private Club 20 0.9 4.5% for motor court
Taxi -- 2.9 1 space per 40 rooms
Total 12.2 Total Spaces Required
30% reduction 8.5 PC Approval Needed for Reduction
Spaces Proposed 9 Spaces Proposed
b. Size of Porte Cochere
BHMC, Article 1. Definitions: Porte Cochere defines a porte-cochere as “a roofed structure covering a driveway which is located between the public street and at least one required parking space.” A porte cochere shall be no more than 20’ in length, no more than (14’) in height, shall be attached to a residence or dwelling… (The Project porte cochere is larger than the size specified as it is an integral part of the building façade and structure. Its size is shown in the architectural plans).

2. Empirical Data from Other Hotels and Cheval Blanc Comparison The design team’s research, including the motor courts at other luxury hotels, is shown in the attached four exhibits. The motor court for each hotel is superimposed on top of the project ground floor to show a comparison and motor court capacity is indicated on the diagrams.

Table 2 compares the number of rooms in each hotel and the capacity of each motor court.

Table 2 - Comparison of Cheval Blanc and other nearby Hotels Hotel Rooms Number of spaces in motor court
Montage 201 8-11
Waldorf Astoria 170 9-12
The Peninsula 194 16-19
Four Seasons 285 11-18
Cheval Blanc 115 9
2 Both the code-based calculation and data from Table 2 suggest that the motor court at Cheval Blanc seems to be right sized at 9 spaces. The Montage Hotel, which has twice the number of rooms as Cheval Blanc has a similar number of spaces in its motor court as proposed for Cheval Blanc.

As further support for this approach to validating vehicle demand at the motor court. A rough traffic count study was produced by Hirsch Green Transportation Consultants at the Montage Hotel motor court. Counts by Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc. of weekday and weekend traffic confirms that traffic generated by the Montage is 60% lower than the traffic that would be generated by ITE for the project.

3. Motor Court Valet Usage
A separate Valet Parking Management Study, dated July 16, 2020 has been performed by LAZ Parking to show how a valet service provider may operate the parking facilities and the motor court. Within the study, an example is provided for how the motor court can operate to meet the non-reduced code required capacity under a valet usage scenario.
3 Location: Montage Hotel (225 N. Canon Drive) Date: 10/23/2019 City: Beverly Hills Day: Wednesday
Time
Beginning
Valet/Passenger
Vehicle Vanity Fair
Rideshare/Towncar/
Taxi/Shuttle Delivery Entering Total
Valet/Passenger
Vehicle Vanity Fair
Rideshare/Towncar/
Taxi/Shuttle Delivery Exiting Total Site Total
6:00 AM 00 0 00 00 0 00 0
6:15 AM 00 1 01 00 1 01 2
6:30 AM 10 3 04 00 3 03 7
6:45 AM 3 0 2 0 5 6 0 2 0 8 13
7:00 AM 5 0 5 0 10 4 0 5 0 9 19
7:15 AM 1 0 5 2 8 0 0 5 2 7 15
7:30 AM 00 0 00 50 1 28 8
7:45 AM 3 0 0 0 3 5 0 3 0 8 11
8:00 AM 40 2 06 00 2 02 8
8:15 AM 6 0 2 0 8 0 0 2 0 2 10
8:30 AM 2 0 3 0 5 4 0 5 2 11 16
8:45 AM 3 0 6 1 10 3 0 6 0 9 19
9:00 AM 6 0 6 0 12 2 0 2 0 4 16
9:15 AM 5 0 1 0 6 5 0 2 0 7 13
9:30 AM 3 0 3 0 6 3 0 5 0 8 14
9:45 AM 8 0 3 0 11 6 0 4 0 10 21
Period Totals 50 0 42 3 95 43 0 48 6 97 192
Peak Hour Totals
(8:30 ‐ 9:30 AM) 16 016 1 33 14 0 15 2 31 64
(9:00 ‐ 10:00 AM) 22 0 13 0 35 16 0 13 0 29 64
Time
Beginning
Valet/Passenger
Vehicle Vanity Fair
Rideshare/Towncar/
Taxi/Shuttle Delivery Entering Total
Valet/Passenger
Vehicle Vanity Fair
Rideshare/Towncar/
Taxi/Shuttle Delivery Exiting Total Site Total
11:00 AM 27 0 4 0 31 2 0 0 0 2 33
11:15 AM 19 0 1 0 20 7 0 1 0 8 28
11:30 AM 18 0 1 0 19 6 0 1 0 7 26
11:45 AM 16 0 2 0 18 3 0 4 0 7 25
12:00 PM 12 0 3 0 15 7 0 4 0 11 26
12:15 PM 7 0 4 0 11 3 0 3 0 6 17
12:30 PM 3 0 2 1 6 4 0 3 0 7 13
12:45 PM 2 0 3 1 6 5 0 3 0 8 14
Period Totals 104 0 20 2 126 37 0 19 0 56 182
Peak Hour Totals
(11:00 AM ‐ 12:00 N) 80 0 8 088 18 0 6 0 24 112
Time
Beginning
Valet/Passenger
Vehicle Vanity Fair
Rideshare/Towncar/
Taxi/Shuttle Delivery Entering Total
Valet/Passenger
Vehicle Vanity Fair
Rideshare/Towncar/
Taxi/Shuttle Delivery Exiting Total Site Total
3:00 PM 4 1 3 1 9 10 1 0 0 11 20
3:15 PM 4 0 1 0 5 9 0 1 0 10 15
3:30 PM 4 0 4 0 8 7 0 4 0 11 19
3:45 PM 7 0 3 0 10 9 0 2 0 11 21
4:00 PM 6 0 3 1 10 7 0 4 0 11 21
4:15 PM 3 0 2 0 5 4 0 1 1 6 11
4:30 PM 3 0 6 0 9 9 0 4 0 13 22
4:45 PM 1 0 4 0 5 3 0 5 0 8 13
5:00 PM 2 0 5 0 7 5 0 7 0 12 19
5:15 PM 6 0 3 0 9 4 0 3 0 7 16
5:30 PM 6 0 1 0 7 7 0 5 0 12 19
5:45 PM 5 0 5 0 10 5 0 7 0 12 22
6:00 PM 4 0 4 1 9 4 0 3 1 8 17
6:15 PM 9 0 6 0 15 6 0 4 0 10 25
6:30 PM 7 0 6 0 13 2 0 5 0 7 20
6:45 PM 2 0 10 1 13 1 0 10 1 12 25
Period Totals 73 1 66 4 144 92 1 65 3 161 270
Peak Hour Totals
(6:00 ‐ 7:00 PM) 22 0 26 250 13 0 22 2 37 87
Entering Exiting
Entering Exiting
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
Observation Study
Midday Period ‐ 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM
Morning Period ‐ 6:00 to 10:00 AM
Afternoon/Evening Period ‐ 3:00 to 7:00 PM
Entering Exiting
Location: Montage Hotel (225 N. Canon Drive) Date: 10/25/2019 City: Beverly Hills Day: Friday
Time
Beginning
Valet/Passenger
Vehicle Vanity Fair
Rideshare/Towncar/
Taxi/Shuttle Delivery Entering Total
Valet/Passenger
Vehicle Vanity Fair
Rideshare/Towncar/
Taxi/Shuttle Delivery Exiting Total Site Total
6:00 AM 00 1 01 00 1 01 2
6:15 AM 00 3 03 00 1 01 4
6:30 AM 00 0 00 10 2 03 3
6:45 AM 10 4 05 00 3 03 8
7:00 AM 00 2 02 00 3 03 5
7:15 AM 00 2 02 00 1 01 3
7:30 AM 10 4 05 00 4 04 9
7:45 AM 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 6 0 6 13
8:00 AM 30 1 04 00 2 02 6
8:15 AM 00 3 03 10 4 05 8
8:30 AM 0 0 4 0 4 3 0 5 0 8 12
8:45 AM 4 0 7 0 11 3 0 5 0 8 19
9:00 AM 00 3 03 00 4 04 7
9:15 AM 4 0 2 0 6 2 0 2 0 4 10
9:30 AM 50 1 06 10 1 02 8
9:45 AM 3 0 6 0 9 4 0 6 0 10 19
Period Totals 21 0 50 0 71 15 0 50 0 65 136
Peak Hour Totals
(8:30 ‐ 9:30 AM) 80 16 0 24 8 0 16 0 24 48
Time
Beginning
Valet/Passenger
Vehicle Vanity Fair
Rideshare/Towncar/
Taxi/Shuttle Delivery Entering Total
Valet/Passenger
Vehicle Vanity Fair
Rideshare/Towncar/
Taxi/Shuttle Delivery Exiting Total Site Total
11:00 AM 8 0 5 0 13 1 0 4 0 5 18
11:15 AM 5 0 5 1 11 2 0 2 0 4 15
11:30 AM 5 0 4 0 9 3 0 3 1 7 16
11:45 AM 6 0 4 1 11 4 0 6 1 11 22
12:00 PM 7 0 5 0 12 5 0 6 1 12 24
12:15 PM 8 0 6 0 14 2 0 7 0 9 23
12:30 PM 5 0 4 0 9 2 0 4 0 6 15
12:45 PM 8 0 3 0 11 3 0 2 0 5 16
Period Totals 52 0 36 2 90 22 0 34 3 59 149
Peak Hour Totals
(11:30 AM ‐ 12:30 PM) 26 019 146 14 0 22 3 39 85
Time
Beginning
Valet/Passenger
Vehicle Vanity Fair
Rideshare/Towncar/
Taxi/Shuttle Delivery Entering Total
Valet/Passenger
Vehicle Vanity Fair
Rideshare/Towncar/
Taxi/Shuttle Delivery Exiting Total Site Total
3:00 PM 4 0 4 0 8 2 0 3 0 5 13
3:15 PM 4 0 1 1 6 6 0 2 1 9 15
3:30 PM 8 0 4 0 12 3 0 2 0 5 17
3:45 PM 7 0 4 0 11 3 0 3 0 6 17
4:00 PM 6 0 4 0 10 3 0 3 0 6 16
4:15 PM 5 0 3 0 8 5 0 3 0 8 16
4:30 PM 12 0 0 0 12 1 0 1 0 2 14
4:45 PM 7 0 6 0 13 6 0 0 0 6 19
5:00 PM 4 0 6 1 11 7 0 6 1 14 25
5:15 PM 1 2 11 0 14 1 2 7 0 10 24
5:30 PM 3 0 4 0 7 4 0 6 0 10 17
5:45 PM 1 2 4 0 7 6 0 6 0 12 19
6:00 PM 7 0 7 0 14 7 0 4 0 11 25
6:15 PM 3 0 3 0 6 2 2 8 0 12 18
6:30 PM 40 1 05 20 1 03 8
6:45 PM 8 0 8 0 16 5 0 7 0 12 28
Period Totals 84 4 70 2 160 63 4 62 2 131 263
Peak Hour Totals
(4:45 ‐ 5:45 PM) 15 227 145 18 219 140 85
(5:00 ‐ 6:00 PM) 9 4 25 1 39 18 2 25 1 46 85
(5:15 ‐ 6:15 PM) 12 4 26 0 42 18 2 23 0 43 85
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
Observation Study
Morning Period ‐ 6:00 to 10:00 AM
Entering Exiting
Note: Vanity Fair replaced By British Academy Film Awards Range Rover Midday Period ‐ 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM
Entering Exiting
Afternoon/Evening Period ‐ 3:00 to 7:00 PM
Entering Exiting
Location: Montage Hotel (225 N. Canon Drive) Date: 10/26/2019 City: Beverly Hills Day: Saturday
Time
Beginning
Valet/Passenger
Vehicle Vanity Fair
Rideshare/Towncar/
Taxi/Shuttle Delivery Entering Total
Valet/Passenger
Vehicle Vanity Fair
Rideshare/Towncar/
Taxi/Shuttle Delivery Exiting Total Site Total
10:00 AM 2 0 6 0 8 1 0 6 0 7 15
10:15 AM 20 1 14 30 0 14 8
10:30 AM 30 1 04 20 1 03 7
10:45 AM 5 0 2 1 8 0 0 5 0 5 13
11:00 AM 3 0 5 0 8 3 0 2 1 6 14
11:15 AM 6 0 2 0 8 3 0 5 0 8 16
11:30 AM 4 0 3 1 8 4 0 6 0 10 18
11:45 AM 7 0 5 0 12 2 0 3 0 5 17
12:00 PM 20 2 04 30 2 05 9
12:15 PM 1 0 3 1 5 3 0 3 1 7 12
12:30 PM 2 0 4 0 6 5 0 3 0 8 14
12:45 PM 2 0 1 0 3 4 0 3 0 7 10
1:00 PM 7 0 2 0 9 0 0 2 0 2 11
1:15 PM 30 0 03 10 3 04 7
1:30 PM 7 0 3 0 10 0 0 3 0 3 13
1:45 PM 8 0 5 0 13 5 0 3 0 8 21
Period Totals 64 0 45 4 113 39 0 50 3 92 205
Peak Hour Totals
(11:00 AM ‐ 12:00 N) 20 015 136 12 0 16 129 65
Time
Beginning
Valet/Passenger
Vehicle Vanity Fair
Rideshare/Towncar/
Taxi/Shuttle Delivery Entering Total
Valet/Passenger
Vehicle Vanity Fair
Rideshare/Towncar/
Taxi/Shuttle Delivery Exiting Total Site Total
4:00 PM 9 0 1 0 10 7 0 3 0 10 20
4:15 PM 8 0 3 0 11 2 0 4 0 6 17
4:30 PM 5 0 8 0 13 3 0 8 0 11 24
4:45 PM 19 0 8 0 27 4 0 8 0 12 39
5:00 PM 15 0 10 0 25 7 0 9 0 16 41
5:15 PM 3 0 4 2 9 3 0 4 2 9 18
5:30 PM 1 0 4 0 5 5 0 4 0 9 14
5:45 PM 9 0 3 0 12 4 0 4 0 8 20
6:00 PM 1 0 5 0 6 2 0 5 0 7 13
6:15 PM 6 0 3 0 9 5 0 6 0 11 20
6:30 PM 3 0 4 0 7 4 0 5 0 9 16
6:45 PM 7 0 4 0 11 2 0 6 0 8 19
Period Totals 86 0 57 2 145 48 0 66 2 116 224
Peak Hour Totals
(4:30 ‐ 5:30 PM) 42 0 30 2 74 17 029 248 122
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
Observation Study
Entering Exiting
Morning/Midday Period ‐ 10:00 AM to 2:00 PM
Afternoon/Evening Period ‐ 4:00 to 7:00 PM
Entering Exiting
Description4 Year
Approved
Site (acres) Hotel SF FAR Stories Other Program Rooms Parking Spaces Structure Valet Porte Cochere Capacity (cars)
Loading
Spaces
Retail1 Rest./Bar Public Assem.

Four-story
hotel with 194
guest rooms
and rooftop
pool and café
1986 2.19 186,000 1.9:1 4 690 SF 194 296 (264 spaces
for hotel, 32
spaces for City
of BH)
2 below grade
16-19 2
Cheval Blanc NA
NOTES:
³7KHKRWHOSURYLGHVVXႈFLHQWSDUNLQJWKDWLVDEOHWRDFFRPPRGDWHDOOXVHVZLWKLQWKHVXEMHFWSURSHUW\ZLWKRXWFDXVLQJRYHUÀRZWRWKHDGMDFHQWVWUHHWV´

None Valet 9
2 Restaurants
1 Bar
1 Cafe
Restaurants
BarV
Valet
6 Total: 2,630 sqft
Total: 347 seats
6 THE PENINSULA, BEVERLY HILLS - PORTE COCHERE COMPARATIVE STUDY SOURCE:

1. City of Beverly Hills – resolution no. 1545, 1/15/2009 &LW\RI%HYHUO\+LOOVSODQQLQJFRPPLVVLRQVWDႇUHSRUW

3. City of Beverly Hills Planning Commission Report, 11/13/2014

4. City of Beverly Hills resolution no. 1773, 5/12/2016

5. Capacity (linear feet/25’ per car). 385.5 Linear feet/25’ per car = 16 cars. Actual capacity is more like 19 cars per Google streetview.

6. Official Website: https://www.peninsula.com/en/beverly-hills/5-star-luxury-hotel-beverly-hills S. SANTA MONICA BLVD.

CHEVAL BLANC

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1"=50'
UP
DN

IHHW

3 4
NA 4.2:1 172 3 levels below
grade
levels 5 3
2 3
2 Trucks
2 Vans
4 BOH
6 6
6 6
6 1 4 4 1
Description1 Year
Approved
Site
(acres)
Hotel SF FAR Stories Other Program Rooms Parking Spaces Structure Valet Porte Cochere Capacity (cars)
Loading
Spaces
Retail Rest./Bar Public Assem.
285 Room, 16-Story
tower with pools,
¿WQHVVIDFLOLWLHV
tennis courts, spa,
meeting rooms,
and multiple
Restaurants/
Lounges
1986 2.00 ~262,000 3.0:1 16 (148 feet) 285 532 Below grade 11-18 Cheval Blanc NA
SOURCE:

2. Central Area Planning Commission Determination Letter, 5/12/2007 None 1 Valet 9
2 Restaurants
3 Bars
Restaurants
BarV
Total:38,351 sqft
Total:2,514 seats

1. Official Website: https://www.fourseasons.com/beverlywilshire/

FOUR SEASONS, BEVERLY HILLS - PORTE COCHERE COMPARATIVE STUDY

3. www.zimas.lacity.org

4. Capacity (linear feet/25’ per car). 269 Linear feet/25’ per car = 11 cars. Actual capacity is more like 18 cars per Google streetview.

S. SANTA MONICA BLVD.

CHEVAL BLANC

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1"=50'
UP
DN

IHHW

2 3 11
1 BOH
1 1
1 22 ) 3 4
NA 4.2:1 170 3 levels below
grade
2 Trucks
2 Van

1.2 Description1 Year Site
(acres)
Hotel SF FAR Stories Other Program Rooms Parking
Spaces
Structure Valet Porte Cochere
Capacity (cars)
Loading
Spaces
Retail Rest./Bar Public Assem
201-room hotel including 55 suites (and 20 wholly owned Montage Residences) ancillary retail, dining, banquet,
and spa facilities; 33,000 square-foot public gardens
space, and subterranean parking.
2004 2.57 373,504 3.3 7 (73
feet)
6,520 201 4 levels
below
grade
Valet
and self
parking
8-116 vans
Cheval Blanc NA
NOTES:

The hotel access is located on Canon Drive with a rectangular motor court design with a ramp directly to and from Level P1 in the parking facility. 1 2 Restaurants None Valet

1 Bar
Total:28,106 sqft
Total:2,675 seats
SOURCE:

1. City of Beverly Hills Architectural Commission, 9/10/2008

2. 3.

4. https://la.curbed.com/2008/11/24/10552946/montage
City of Beverly Hills Planning Commission 12/11/2003 yy Official Website: https://www.montagehotels.com/beverlyhills/

5. http://www.smartvoter.org/2005/03/08/ca/la/meas/BeverlyHills---A/

6. Capacity (linear feet/25’ per car). 203.5 Linear feet/25’ per car = 8 cars. Actual capacity is more like 11 cars per Google streetview.

7. City of Beverly Hills Resolution No. 04-R-11772 11/30/2004

8. https://www.forbes.com/sites/petertaylor/2016/11/17/montage-beverly-hills-is-ranked-the-top-luxury-hotel-in-los-angeles-2-years-in-a-row-heres-why/#5eef8b511938 yy g

MONTAGE, BEVERLY HILLS - PORTE COCHERE COMPARATIVE STUDY S. SANTA MONICA BLVD.

CHEVAL BLANC

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1"=50'
UP DN
3 levels
below grade
2 Trucks
2 Van
82 2
1 23 3 Restaurants
2 Bars3
3 3
N/A 1.2 4.2:1 9(115 feet) 115
BOH
2 4 2
172
1217 (555
Hotel/Condo:
663 City of BH)9

9. Beverly hills Condos/garage/Montage Hotel Community Informational Meeting 02/05/2005 DN
UP
57'-0"
57'-0"
57'-0"
DN
SOURCE:

1. City of Beverly Hills Planning Commission, 11/8/2018 $UFKLWHFWXUDO3ODQV%HYHUO\+LOWRQ5HYLWDOL]DWLRQ3ODQ3ODQQLQJ0RGL¿FDWLRQ

3. City of Beverly Hills Architectural Commission, 6/18/2014 Description Year
Approved
Site (acres) Hotel SF FAR Stories Other Program Rooms Parking Spaces Structure Valet Porte Cochere Capacity (cars)
Loading
Spaces
Retail Rest./Bar Public Assem BOH
$VWRU\¿YHVWDU
hotel with 170 guest
rooms, restaurants,
and guest serving
spaces including
multiple pools.
2008 1.29 (56,014 SF) 207,206 3.69:1 12 (154 feet) 5,761 53,347 170 314 2 levels below grade
Valet 9-12
Cheval Blanc NA Restaurants None
BarV
2 Restaurants
1 Bar
Valet 9
Total: 7,314 sqft
Total: 750 seats

WALDORF ASTORIA, BEVERLY HILLS - PORTE COCHERE COMPARATIVE STUDY yy

4. Capacity (linear feet/25’ per car). 209 Linear feet/25’ per car = 9 cars. Actual capacity is more like 12 cars per Google streetview.

5. Tract No. 66866, June 2014

6. Official Website: https://www.waldorfastoriabeverlyhills.com/ S. SANTA MONICA BLVD.

CHEVAL BLANC

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1"=50'
DN
UP
DN

IHHW
OHYHOVEHORZ
JUDGH

NA
2 Trucks
2 Van
N/A
35 1 1 2 6 6
6 6
1 2
2 4

4.2:1
Attachment 12
LAZ Valet Parking Management Plan
Dated 9.7.22
10635 Santa Monica Blvd.

Suite #145
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Ph 888.937.2758
Fax 310.441.1792
www.lazparking.com

REGIONAL OFFICES
Atlanta
Boston
Chicago
Dallas
Hartford
Houston
Los Angeles
Miami
New York
Philadelphia
San Diego
San Francisco
Washington, DC
Partners In ParkingTM
March 3, 2020
revised September 7, 2022
Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills
Valet Parking Management Plan

PROJECT OVERVIEW
Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills is a much-anticipated project, whose brand currently has properties in France, the Maldives, and St. Barts. The project will consist of 115 luxury units, a private club, a luxurious spa, several food and beverage outlets, and retail space that will occupy the block bound by South Santa Monica Boulevard to the north and North Beverly Drive and Rodeo Drive to the east and west.

The project will be served by a subterranean garage with 139 spaces distributed over three levels, with guest parking accommodated through a valet parking operation. Taxi/Ride share pick-up and drop-off will also be accommodated in the project’s porte-cochere/motor court, as utilization of such services continue to increase and have become an important operational component to design for and around. With thoughtful design consideration, both operations will co-exist without any circulation conflicts between the two.

LAZ Parking was commissioned to prepare the following Valet Parking Management Plan, which describes the overall design of the parking supply and outlines the manner in which the valet parking operation will be managed in order to make the most efficient use of the site, optimizing operational best practices to ensure seamless parking experiences for the project’s guests and visitors.

AP EXHIBIT 2
CHEVAL BLANC PROJECT | Parking Management Plan 2
Partners In ParkingTM

PORTE-COCHERE LAYOUT
The project’s porte-cochere/motor court is located off of South Santa Monica Boulevard, with the entry driveway located west of the exit driveway, resulting in a counter-clockwise traffic pattern that prevents any cross-traffic movements. With approximately 42’-0” between the curb in front of the project’s front doors and the pair of structural columns across the driveway, a total of three vehicular lanes can be accommodated with comfortable door opening space. Upon entry into the porte-cochere/motor court, hotel guests/visitors will be directed into one of these three lanes for dropping off their vehicles, depending on the time of day and volume of arriving/departing vehicles being handled at the time:

Signage will exist at the driveway entrance that directs appropriate drivers to the designated Taxi/Ride share lane, closest to South Santa Monica Boulevard. By dedicating a lane for such uses, the time attendants have to spend approaching these vehicles is minimized, allowing them to focus their attention to vehicles specifically arriving for valet parking.

Taxi/Ride Share Lane
#1
#2
#3
South Santa Monica Boulevard
North Beverly Boulevard
Rodeo Drive
CHEVAL BLANC PROJECT | Parking Management Plan 3
Partners In ParkingTM

NORTH BEVERLY DRIVE VALET STATION
Consistent with the request and approval of the Beverly Hills Planning Commission, a valet station will be permanently located along North Beverly Drive to serve Club Members & their guests. The Beverly Drive valet station will be located curbside, in the public right of way, opposite the Club Lobby. It will be used by club members and their guests during normal club hours for valet operations, as well as club member pick-up or drop-off by ride-share, taxi, private vehicle, or other mode. Design of the valet station will be subject to approval of the City of Beverly Hills Public Works Department.

VALET DROP-OFF / PICK-UP PROCEDURES
As guests/visitors enter the porte-cochere/motor court, they will be greeted by a Lead Valet, who will be equipped with pre-printed, barcoded tickets. The Lead Valet will issue one portion of the perforated ticket to the patron, while the remaining portions of the barcoded ticket remain with the valet attendant that will park the vehicle. Different colored tickets will be utilized for the various user groups (hotel guest, restaurant patron, etc.) in order to easily identify them upon departure. During this ticketing process, the Lead Valet, along with the valet attendant, are visually inspecting the vehicle for pre-existing damage, so that it can be noted on the ticket.

Once the vehicle has been processed, the valet attendant will drive out of the porte-cochere/motor court and make a right turn onto South Santa Monica Boulevard, an immediate right turn onto North Beverly Drive, and a right turn into the service alley to approach the downbound ramp into the garage. The
valet attendant will then proceed to Levels B1, B2, or B3, with Level B2 primarily utilized for short-term vehicles.

Once parked, the valet attendant will input the make, color, license plate and vehicle location onto the valet ticket.

This ticket will then be affixed to the vehicle keys and brought back to the cashier at the valet station, located on the east side of the porte-cochere/motor court. The
exception would be those keys for vehicles parked in front tandem spaces, which will remain with the spaces
themselves in nearby column-mounted lockboxes. The
cashier is then responsible for scanning the valet ticket and inputting the vehicle information into the valet
database.

When the patron is ready to retrieve their vehicle, they simply report to the valet station to present their ticket. As the cashier scans the ticket and collects the valet fee, the ticket/keys are handed to a valet attendant for retrieval and delivery back to the porte-cochere/motor court.

During this retrieval process, valet patrons will be directed to the waiting area where they have clear line-of-sight regarding vehicles being delivered by the valet attendants. Sample Pre-Printed, Barcode Valet Tickets CHEVAL BLANC PROJECT | Parking Management Plan 4
Partners In ParkingTM

VALET PARKING STORAGE
The valet vehicles will be stored on one of the three subterranean levels, with the 139 total spaces distributed as indicated in the table below.

As hotel guest, club member, spa and restaurant patron and other visitor parking in the garage will be entirely managed through the valet parking operation, the general methodology regarding use of the regular versus tandem spaces would be to reserve those single stalls for higherturnover use, such as for hotel guest visitor or restaurant patron vehicles and employee vehicles that will not be parked by the valet. The tandem spaces, on the other hand, would be utilized for hotel guest vehicles that would tend to possess longer durations and thus, require less movement into and out of the stalls.

CHEVAL BLANC PROJECT | Parking Management Plan 5
Partners In ParkingTM
Valet Attendant Garage Access
To prevent unauthorized vehicles from entering the subterranean garage, keycard readers and gate arms shall be installed at the tops of the downbound and upbound ramps leading to and from the first lower level.

Stack Parking
In the event additional parking capacity becomes necessary, the valet attendants have the ability to stack park vehicles within the drive aisles, being mindful to avoid stack parking in turning bays or other areas of the garage that may adversely impact circulation. The diagrams on the following page depict a conceptual stack parking layout that yields a potential additional capacity of 79 spaces, for a total of 218 available event parking spaces.

Entry/Exit Access Control Equipment
CHEVAL BLANC PROJECT | Parking Management Plan 6
Partners In ParkingTM
Level B2
Level B3
Level B1
CHEVAL BLANC PROJECT | Parking Management Plan 7
Partners In ParkingTM

VALET OPERATIONS STAFFING
Based on LAZ Parking’s experience on other projects possessing similar dynamics and microsimulation analysis provided by Iteris, the following schedule provides an estimation of staffing coverage needed to meet the operational requirements for the Cheval Blanc project. One Shift Lead and three valet attendants would be scheduled during the morning hours, one Shift Lead and three valet attendants scheduled to cover the evening hours, a swing shift of three valet attendants would supplement shifts to cover peak traffic hours in the afternoon to evening, and the Manager on site would provide breaks and assist with the lunch and dinner rushes.

For any questions regarding this Valet Parking Management Plan, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely,
Rio Lupisan
Special Projects / Development Manager
Cc: Dane Nielsen
Attachment 13
LVMH Memorandum
Club and Restaurant Operations and Usage
Dated 4.21.22
PD EXHIBIT 1A

Attachment 14
LVMH Memorandum
Retail Parking
Dated 5.6.22

19 EAST 57TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10022

MEMORANDUM
To: Sri Chakravarthy, P.E., and Matt Stewart, P.E.

Kimley Horn
From: LVMH, Inc.

Date: 2022/05/06
Re: Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills – Retail VIP-VIC Customer Parking This memorandum provides information regarding management of: 1) general retail customer parking at Cheval Blanc Paris, which is adjacent to La Samaritaine Paris PontNeuf, LVMH’s 215,280 square foot luxury retail destination; and 2) VIP and VIC retail customer parking at LVMH, Inc.’s existing Louis Vuitton, Dior and Celine stores on Rodeo Drive in Beverly Hills, California, and the capacity for on-site VIP and VIC retail customer parking that will be needed for the 150’ of retail frontage (24,976 square feet) on Rodeo Drive that is proposed as part of Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills.

Cheval Blanc Paris & La Samaritaine Paris Pont-Neuf
Cheval Blanc Paris and La Samaritaine Paris Pont-Neuf are both housed in the former La Samaritaine historic department store buildings immediately adjacent to each other.

In order to prevent the hotel parking from being overburdened by those shopping at the adjacent retail, a bright-line rule prohibits retail parking in the hotel garage.

Rodeo Drive VIP-VIC Parking
Our Rodeo Drive VIP and VIC clients largely shop by appointment. They have an ongoing relationship with each store. They require privacy and therefore do not often enter our stores by the front, sidewalk-accessible entrance.

Our existing Louis Vuitton, Dior and Celine stores on Rodeo Drive currently serve a maximum of 5 VIP and/or VIC customers at a time and often less than that. While our standard retail frontage on Rodeo Drive is 50’, it should be noted that a store occupying 100’ of Rodeo Drive frontage will not necessarily serve twice the number of VIP and/or VIC clients. We believe that fifteen on-site spaces for VIP-VIC retail customers would be more than adequate to serve the proposed 150’ of retail frontage under the hotel.

When VIP and VIC customers at the retail stores that will be part of Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills make an appointment, they will be instructed to self-park by entering the relocated alley off of North Beverly and driving into the underground parking via the down ramp. Retail store employees will provide appointment details to the security guard stationed adjacent to the down ramp to the underground parking, in order that the security guard can operate the swing arm at the top of the down ramp. The location of the security guard station is shown below.

PD EXHIBIT 1B

19 EAST 57TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10022
VIP and VIC customers will park in the spaces located on the B2 basement floor on the west (North Rodeo) side of the parking area near the retail elevators.1 These parking spaces and the three retail elevators providing access to the retail spaces are shown below. When VIP and VIC customers park, they will be met by a Retail employee in the garage and taken up to the applicable store by elevator. At the end of their visits, VIP and VIC customers will exit via the up ramp and by driving south down the alley to Brighton Avenue. There will be no retail customer valet service, for VIPs, VICs or any other retail customers, at the hotel’s motor court on South Santa Monica. 1 ADA-compliant stalls are also available on the B1 basement floor, in proximity to the retail elevators.

19 EAST 57TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10022
Attachment 15
Fehr and Peers Memorandum
Alternative Club Access
Dated 5.16.22
600 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1050, Los Angeles, CA 90017 (213) 261-3050 www.fehrandpeers.com

MEMORANDUM
Date: May 16, 2022
To: Masa Alkire, City of Beverly Hills
From: Sarah Brandenberg
Subject: Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Specific Plan – Potential Site Access Alternative Ref: 3243
This memorandum presents the evaluation of a potential site access alternative for the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Specific Plan (Project). Under the potential site access alternative, the member’s club would not utilize the hotel motor court. Instead, the club members and their guests would self-park in the subterranean parking garage or utilize a separate valet stand on the west side of North Beverly Drive adjacent to the Project site. This potential site access alternative would reduce the number of vehicles utilizing the motor court and reduce the average delay for vehicles exiting the motor court. The findings of the potential site access alternative are summarized below.

POTENTIAL SITE ACCESS ALTERNATIVE
The 500-member private membership club provides access to a screening room, restaurants/food serving uses, bar, lounge and social spaces, and the hotel’s wellness center. The club also has the ability to hold a limited number of events for club members per year based on the size of the event. Based on the membership levels and site amenities, the membership club was estimated to generate 180 daily vehicle-trips including 20 vehicle-trips during the AM peak hour and 40 vehicle-trips in the PM peak hour. The trip generation of the Project is provided in the Local Transportation Assessment, Fehr & Peers, May 2022.

In the proposed Project, hotel, public restaurant, day spa, and club visitors to the Project are assumed to access the Project using the motor court located on South Santa Monica Boulevard.

Club members traveling by private vehicle will use the valet service in the motor court, and valet employees will then drive arriving guests’ vehicles eastbound on South Santa Monica Boulevard and southbound on North Beverly Drive to enter the reconfigured alley and access the Project’s subterranean parking. For departing guests, valet employees will use the direct outbound access from the subterranean parking to the motor court.

Under the potential site access alternative, club members would be able to self-park in the subterranean parking or utilize a separate valet stand on the west side of North Beverly Drive adjacent to the Project site which would be in operation from approximately 11:00 AM to 11:00 PM. When using the separate valet stand, club members would be able to drop-off and pick-up their vehicles at the North Beverly Drive loading zone and then enter/exit the Project site from the Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills
May 16, 2022

Page 2 ends

club member’s entrance on North Beverly Drive. Valet drivers would then take vehicles directly to the subterranean parking that is accessible from the reconfigured alley. When returning vehicles to club members, valet drivers would use the direct outbound access from the subterranean parking to the motor court, and then exit the motor court onto South Santa Monica Boulevard to return the vehicle to the valet stand on North Beverly Drive.

When self-parking during the hours when valet service is unavailable, club members would access the Project site via the relocated alley entrance on North Beverly Drive and then enter the subterranean parking. Club members that self-park would then exit the Project using the southbound alley onto Brighton Way.

MOTOR COURT OPERATIONS
Motor court operations were analyzed with the potential site access alternative during the PM peak hour to reflect the highest travel demand for the Project site. The first step in analyzing motor court operations was to determine the number of vehicles that would enter and exit the motor court with the separate valet stand on North Beverly Drive for the member’s club. Figure 1 illustrates the number of vehicles utilizing the motor court during the PM peak hour with the potential site access alternative in comparison to the proposed Project. As shown, the number of vehicles entering the motor court would be reduced from 117 to 85 and the number of vehicles exiting the motor court would be reduced from 148 to 116 during the PM peak hour.

The motor court traffic volumes with the potential site access alternative were then used to analyze operations for vehicles exiting the motor court onto South Santa Monica Boulevard. At the Motor Court Driveway/South Santa Monica Boulevard intersection, operations for vehicles exiting the motor court are projected to operate at LOS D in the PM peak hour with an average vehicle delay of 29.8 seconds under existing plus Project conditions with the potential site access alternative. Under future plus Project conditions with the site access alternative, operations for vehicles exiting the motor court are also projected to operate at LOS D in the PM peak hour with an average vehicle delay of 33.8 seconds.

Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills Specific Plan
Cheval Blanc PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes With Beverly Drive Loading Zone Figure 1
S Santa Monica Blvd
N Beverly Dr
31 (63)
54 (54)
85 (117)
23 (31)
54 (54)
39 (63)
31 (31)
Legend
Visitor Trips
TNC Trips
Valet Trips
Total Trips
40 Beverly Loading Zone 116 (148)
Beverly
Loading Zone
PM Peak Hour Vehicle Counts
New Beverly Loading (Motor Court Only)
## (##)
Motor Court Activity – Vehicle Trips by
Project Use
Project Use
Daily
Trips (%
of total)
Highest
Peak Hour
Trips
(% of total)
Hotel 800 60
42% 35%
Club** 90 8
5% 5%
Restaurant
935 95
49% 56%
Retail* N/A N/A

N/A N/A
Spa
70 7
4% 4%
TOTAL 1,895 170
100% 100%
*Retail visitors will park off-site in City-owned parking garages; VIP customers shopping by appointment will park in the Project's parking garage and will not use motor court. **Club trips reflect outbound valet vehicles that utilize the motor court to access North Beverly loading zone.

Cheval Blanc Beverly Hills
May 16, 2022

Page 4 ends

Beverly Hills City CouncilSeptember 20, 2022

Beverly Hills City Council
September 20, 2022