1 * Time is approximate. Closed Session shall begin upon conclusion of the Study Session.
B0785-0001\2990949v1.doc
CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS
City Hall
City Council Chamber and Room 280B
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Public Comment Participation:
In-person in City Council Chamber
or by calling (310) 288-2288
or by email at [email protected]
CLOSED SESSION AGENDA
August 6, 2024
2:30 p.m.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL
The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the local agency in the litigation.
Anticipation of Litigation
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) Number of Cases: 1
1. DuPont Clinic had its lease revoked by its Landlord, Douglas Emmett, and it is alleged that the City was somehow involved in the revocation or interference with the lease.
Existing Litigation
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
Name of Case:
1. Jasmine Williams, et al. v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV31949
This litigation concerns an allegation of racial profiling by the Beverly Hills Police Department.
2. Dupont Clinic, PC, et al. v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV24271
This litigation concerns allegations related to an alleged interference with the lease. 2 B0785-0001\2990949v1.doc
3. Ryan Lawrence, et al. v. City of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCP02217.
This litigation concerns an alleged breach of contract.
4. In re National Prescription Opioid Litigation, MDL No. 2804 (Federal District Court N.D. Ohio)
This multidistrict litigation concerns allegations that drug companies contributed to the opioid crisis by promoting prescription painkillers and downplaying addiction risks.
5. Ian Greene, et al. v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., United States District Court Case No. 24-cv-05916-MRA-AS
This litigation concerns an allegation of racial profiling by the Beverly Hills Police Department.
6. Public Land for Public Use v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCP01063
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s declaration of Surplus Land.