1 * Time is approximate. Closed Session shall begin upon conclusion of the Study Session.
B0785-0001\2996699v1.doc
CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS
City Hall
City Council Chamber and Room 280B
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Public Comment Participation:
In-person in City Council Chamber
or by calling (310) 288-2288
or by email at [email protected]
CLOSED SESSION AGENDA
August 20, 2024
2:30 p.m.
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
Government Code Section 54956.8
1. Property: 38 N. La Cienega Boulevard
City Negotiator: Nancy Hunt-Coffey, City Manager
Negotiating Party: 38 N. LA CIENEGA BLVD
Under negotiation:
Price
Terms of Payment
x Both
The City is considering whether to purchase the property.
2. Property: 9212-9220 Olympic Boulevard
City Negotiator: Nancy Hunt-Coffey, City Manager
Negotiating Party: EHI BH, LLC
Bocks Canyon Holdings, LLC
Under negotiation:
Price
Terms of Payment
x Both
The City is considering whether to purchase the property. 2 B0785-0001\2996699v1.doc
THREAT TO PUBLIC SERVICES OR FACILITIES
Consultation with: Mark G. Stainbrook, Chief of Police
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL
The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the local agency in the litigation.
Anticipation of Litigation
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) Number of Cases: 1
1. DuPont Clinic had its lease revoked by its Landlord, Douglas Emmett, and it is alleged that the City was somehow involved in the revocation or interference with the lease.
Existing Litigation
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
Name of Case:
1. Jasmine Williams, et al. v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV31949
This litigation concerns an allegation of racial profiling by the Beverly Hills Police Department.
2. Dupont Clinic, PC, et al. v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV24271
This litigation concerns allegations related to an alleged interference with the lease.
3. Duncan, et al. v. CalPERS, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCP02217.
This litigation concerns an alleged breach of contract.
4. Ian Greene, et al. v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., United States District Court Case No. 24-cv-05916-MRA-AS
This litigation concerns an allegation of racial profiling by the Beverly Hills Police Department.
5. Public Land for Public Use v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCP01063
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s declaration of Surplus Land.
6. Margaret K. Vodrey, et al. v. The City of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV35215
This litigation concerns a small landslide that occurred in the City of Beverly Hills. 3 B0785-0001\2996699v1.doc
7. Californians For Homeownership, Inc. v. City of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 24STCP02082
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the application for 125-129 S. Linden drive was incomplete.
8. Robertson Blvd Special Task Force, et al. v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCP00989
This litigation concerns trees on Robertson Boulevard.
9. Yitzchok Frankel, et al. v. Regents of the University of California, et al., United States District Court Case No. 2:24-CV-4702
This litigation concerns allegations of Civil Rights Act violations by the University of California at Los Angeles.
10. Beverly Hills Citizens Coalition v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 24STCP02553
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s CEQA determination concerning the development proposed at 9229 Wilshire Boulevard.