1 * Time is approximate. Closed Session shall begin upon conclusion of the Study Session.
B0785-0001\3035968v1.doc
CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS
City Hall
City Council Chamber and Room 280B
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Public Comment Participation:
In-person in City Council Chamber
or by calling (310) 288-2288
or by email at [email protected]
CLOSED SESSION AGENDA
November 19, 2024
2:30 p.m.
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
Government Code Section 54956.8
1. Property: 38 N. La Cienega Boulevard
City Negotiator: Nancy Hunt-Coffey, City Manager
Negotiating Party: 38 N LA CIENEGA BLVD
Under negotiation:
Price
Terms of Payment
x Both
The City is considering whether to purchase the property.
2. Property: Property Identified as Assessor’s Parcel Number 4334-021-900, and Further Identified as the Metro Wilshire-La Cienega Station at the Northeast Corner of Wilshire Blvd. and La Cienega Blvd.
City Negotiator: Nancy Hunt-Coffey, City Manager
Negotiating Party: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Under negotiation:
Price
Terms of Payment
x Both
The City is considering a license agreement for a public safety kiosk on the plaza. 2 B0785-0001\3035968v1.doc
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL
The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the local agency in the litigation.
Existing Litigation
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
Name of Case:
1. Jasmine Williams, et al. v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV31949
This litigation concerns an allegation of racial profiling by the Beverly Hills Police Department.
2. Ian Greene, et al. v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., United States District Court Case No. 24-cv-05916-MRA-AS
This litigation concerns an allegation of racial profiling by the Beverly Hills Police Department.
3. DuPont Clinic, PC, et al. v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV24271
This litigation concerns allegations related to an alleged interference with the lease.
4. Californians For Homeownership, Inc. v. City of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 24STCP02082
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the application for 125-129 S. Linden drive was incomplete.
5. 9300 Wilshire, LLC v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 24STCP02964
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the application for 125-129 S. Linden drive was incomplete.
6. Margaret K. Vodrey, et al. v. The City of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV35215
This litigation concerns a small landslide that occurred in the City of Beverly Hills. 3 B0785-0001\3035968v1.doc
7. Temple of the Arts v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 19STCV20941 This litigation concerns a complaint alleging damages associated with the Metro construction.
8. Terence May v. City of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV29849
This litigation concerns alleged violations of the Fair Employment and Housing Act.
9. Beverly Hills Citizens Coalition v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 24STCP02553
This litigation concerns a challenge to the approval of a development application for a mixed use building on Wilshire Boulevard.