1 * Time is approximate. Closed Session shall begin upon conclusion of the Study Session.
B0785-0001\3119434v1.doc
CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS
City Hall
City Council Chamber and Room 280B
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Public Comment Participation:
In-person in City Council Chamber
or by calling (310) 288-2288
or by email at [email protected]
CLOSED SESSION AGENDA
June 17, 2025
2:30 p.m.
THREAT TO PUBLIC SERVICES OR FACILITIES
Government Code Section 54957
Consultation with: Mark G. Stainbrook, Chief of Police
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL
The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the local agency in the litigation.
Potential Initiation of Litigation
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)
Number of Cases: 1
Anticipation of Litigation
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) and (d)(3).
Number of Cases: 5
1. The City has received a written threat of litigation concerning a residential development project at 9220 N. Santa Monica Blvd. (also known as Parcels 12 and 13). Documentation of the threat is available in the City Clerk’s office.
2. The City has received a threat of litigation concerning a “builder’s remedy” project at 211-217 South Hamilton Drive. Documentation of the threat is available in the City Clerk’s office.
2 B0785-0001\3119434v1.doc
3. The City has received a written threat of litigation concerning a proposed development project at 145 S. Rodeo Drive. Documentation of the threat is available in the City Clerk’s office.
4. The City has received a written threat of litigation concerning a proposed development project at 9441 West Olympic Blvd. Documentation of the threat is available in the City Clerk’s office.
5. The City has received a written threat of litigation concerning a proposed development project at 9430 West Olympic Blvd. Documentation of the threat is available in the City Clerk’s office.
Existing Litigation
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
Name of Case:
1. DuPont Clinic, PC, et al. v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV24271, and related cases 23STCV19298, 24STCV28644, 25STCV11915 This litigation concerns allegations related to an alleged interference with a lease.
2. Californians For Homeownership, Inc. v. City of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 24STCP02082
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the application for 125-129 S. Linden drive was incomplete.
3. 9300 Wilshire, LLC v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 24STCP02964
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the application for 125-129 S. Linden drive was incomplete.
4. 8800 Wilshire Associates, LP v. City of Beverly Hills, et al.; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25 STCP01129
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for this property was lost due to a change to the square footage.
5. 8820 Wilshire Associates, LP v. City of Beverly Hills, et al.; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. STCP01131
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for this property was lost due to a change to the square footage. 3 B0785-0001\3119434v1.doc
6. California Housing Defense Fund, et al., v. City of Beverly Hills; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25STCP01665
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for the property at 8800 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills was lost due to a change to the square footage.
7. California Housing Defense Fund, et al., v. City of Beverly Hills; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25STCP00260
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for the property at 8820 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills was lost due to a change to the square footage.
8. Californians for Homeownership, Inc., et al. v. City of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25STCP02017
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for the property at 140 S. Camden Drive, Beverly Hills was lost.
9. Wilshire Camden LLC v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25STCP02058
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for the property at 140 S. Camden Drive, Beverly Hills was lost.
CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Government Code Section 54957.6
CITY NEGOTIATOR: Peter J. Brown, Special Counsel
Employee Organization: Police Officers Association (POA) The most recent Memorandum of Understanding with the Police Officers Association was adopted May 24, 2022.
CITY NEGOTIATOR: Peter J. Brown, Special Counsel
Employee Organization: Police Management Association (PMA) The most recent Memorandum of Understanding with the Police Management Association was adopted May 24, 2022.
CITY NEGOTIATOR: Peter J. Brown, Special Counsel
Employee Organization: Fire Association
The most recent Memorandum of Understanding with the Fire Association was adopted October 1, 2019.
4 B0785-0001\3119434v1.doc
CITY NEGOTIATOR: Sharona R. Nazarian, PsyD., Mayor
Unrepresented Employee: City Manager
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
Government Code Section 54957
Title: City Manager