1 * Time is approximate. Closed Session shall begin upon conclusion of the Study Session.
B0785-0001\3158220v1.doc
CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS
City Hall
City Council Chamber and Room 280B
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Public Comment Participation:
In-person in City Council Chamber
or by calling (310) 288-2288
or by email at [email protected]
CLOSED SESSION AGENDA
September 30, 2025
2:30 p.m.
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
Government Code Section 54956.8
1. Property: 401 South Roxbury Drive
City Negotiator: Nancy Hunt-Coffey, City Manager
Negotiating Party: COAST ENERGY DEVCO, LLC
Under negotiation:
Price
Terms of Payment
x Both
The City is considering the terms of a proposed lease to install solar equipment on the rooftop of the Roxbury Park Community Center as part of the Clean Power Alliance’s Power Ready Program.
2. Property: 211-217 South Hamilton Drive
City Negotiator: Nancy Hunt-Coffey, City Manager
Negotiating Party: Flamingo Investments
18 Hamilton LLC
Under negotiation:
Price
Terms of Payment
x Both
The City is considering whether to purchase the property. 2 B0785-0001\3158220v1.doc
3. Property: 495 Trousdale Place
City Negotiator: Nancy Hunt-Coffey, City Manager
Negotiating Party: Southern California Edison
Under negotiation:
Price
Terms of Payment
x Both
The City is considering the terms of a proposed easement to install utility infrastructure on a City-owned property.
4. Property: Beverly Vista School
200 South Elm Drive
El Rodeo Elementary School
605 Whittier Drive
Hawthorne School
624 North Rexford Drive
Horace Mann School
8701 Charleville Boulevard
Beverly Hills High School
241 Moreno Drive
City Negotiator: Nancy Hunt-Coffey, City Manager
Negotiating Party: Beverly Hills Unified School District Under negotiation:
Price
Terms of Payment
x Both
The City is considering an amendment to this lease.
THREAT TO PUBLIC SERVICES OR FACILITIES
Government Code Section 54957
Consultation with: Mark G. Stainbrook, Chief of Police
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL
The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the local agency in the litigation.
Anticipation of Litigation
3 B0785-0001\3158220v1.doc
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) and (d)(3).
Number of Cases: 2
1. The City has received a written threat of litigation concerning a proposed development project at 145 S. Rodeo Drive. Documentation of the threat is available in the City Clerk’s office.
2. The City has received an oral threat of litigation concerning the proposed development project at 8300 Wilshire Blvd. Documentation of this threat is available in the City Clerk’s office.
Existing Litigation
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
Name of Case:
1. DuPont Clinic, PC, et al. v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV24271, and related cases including DuPont Clinic, PC v. DE BHMC, LLC 23STCV19298, 24STCV28644, 25STCV11915
This litigation concerns allegations related to an alleged interference with a lease.
2. Ian Greene, et al. v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., United States District Court Case No. 24-cv-05916-MRA-AS
This litigation concerns an allegation of racial profiling by the Beverly Hills Police Department.
3. Californians For Homeownership, Inc. v. City of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 24STCP02082
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the application for 125-129 S. Linden drive was incomplete.
4. 9300 Wilshire, LLC v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 24STCP02964
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the application for 125-129 S. Linden drive was incomplete.
5. Californians for Homeownership, Inc., et al. v. City of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25STCP02017
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for the property at 140 S. Camden Drive, Beverly Hills was lost. 4 B0785-0001\3158220v1.doc
6. Wilshire Camden LLC v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25STCP02058
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for the property at 140 S. Camden Drive, Beverly Hills was lost.
7. 8800 Wilshire Associates, LP v. City of Beverly Hills, et al.; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25 STCP01129
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for this property was lost due to a change to the square footage.
8. 8820 Wilshire Associates, LP v. City of Beverly Hills, et al.; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. STCP01131
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for this property was lost due to a change to the square footage.
9. California Housing Defense Fund, et al., v. City of Beverly Hills; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25STCP01665
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for the property at 8800 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills was lost due to a change to the square footage.
10. California Housing Defense Fund, et al., v. City of Beverly Hills; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25STCP00260
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for the property at 8820 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills was lost due to a change to the square footage.
11. Anthony Freeman v. City of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 24STCV25489
This litigation concerns an allegation of wrongful termination and disability discrimination.
12. Rabbi Ruben Milikan v. City of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25STCP03594
This litigation concerns a challenge to the California Environmental Quality Act decision concerning 412 North Oakhurst.
13. Alejandra Garcia, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court 5 B0785-0001\3158220v1.doc
Case No. 21STCV07940
This litigation concerns alleged civil rights violations arising from curfews associated with the violence after the George Floyd killing.
CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Government Code Section 54957.6
CITY NEGOTIATOR: Peter J. Brown, Special Counsel
Employee Organization: Police Officers Association (POA) The most recent Memorandum of Understanding with the Police Officers Association was adopted May 24, 2022.
CITY NEGOTIATOR: Peter J. Brown, Special Counsel
Employee Organization: Fire Association
The most recent Memorandum of Understanding with the Fire Association was adopted October 1, 2019.
CITY NEGOTIATOR: Peter J. Brown, Special Counsel
Employee Organization: Management and Professional Association.
The most current Memorandum of Understanding with the Management and Professional Association has a term of October 7, 2023 – October 2, 2026.
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Government Code Section 54957
Title: City Manager
City Clerk
City Attorney
This is the evaluation of these positions that report to the City Council.