Beverly Hills City Council
March 4, 2026

AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: March 4, 2026
Item Number:

To: Honorable Mayor & City Council
From: Daren Grilley, Assistant Director of Public Works/City Engineer Tristan Malabanan, Project Manager
Subject: AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY

OF BEVERLY HILLS AND KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS,
INC. FOR THE LA CIENEGA WELL #2 AND #3 DESIGN; AND

APPROVAL OF A CHANGE PURCHASE ORDER IN THE AMOUNT
OF $358,078 FOR A TOTAL NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF
$1,936,117
Attachments: 1. Amendment No. 1

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council approve Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc. (KJ) to provide professional design services for a total not-to-exceed amount of $1,936,117 for the La Cienega Well #2 (LCW-2) and #3 (LCW3) project.

INTRODUCTION
This report is a request for City Council approval of Amendment No. 1 to an agreement between the City of Beverly Hills and KJ to continue engineering design and construction support services related to the equipping design project for the LCW-2 and LCW-3. These wells are now commonly referred to as the Le Doux Well and the Gregory Well.

DISCUSSION
On December 13, 2022, City Council approved a purchase order in the not-to-exceed amount of $1,578,039 to KJ for an agreement to provide design services for the La Brea Subarea water production well sites (LCW-2 and LCW-3) at La Cienega Park.

Subsequent major milestones of the project are as follows:
 On November 23, 2023, City Council approved the development (drilling and testing) of the Le Doux and Gregory Wells at La Cienega Park. In addition, Council found the project to be categorically exempt from further review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Exemption Class 32.

BEVERL
HILLS
.�
Meeting Date: March 4, 2026

 On February 6, 2024, Environmental Construction, Inc. (ECI) was awarded a contract for construction of the two potable water wells.  On July 1, 2025, the drilling project with ECI was completed and accepted by City Council.

During the drilling project, the contractor encountered additional constituents at the Le Doux Well that were not anticipated. Upon reviewing test results and deliberation with design consultant team and Water Division staff, the decision was made to redrill the Le Doux well to perform additional zone tests and increase the battery of water quality tests (regulatory and non-regulatory) for both the Le Doux and Gregory Wells.

Following completion of drilling at the La Cienega Park well sites, City staff and consultants evaluated the feasibility of integrating the new wells into the City’s existing water treatment system. This review confirmed that water from the wells can be effectively treated using current facilities without the need for major upgrades. These proposed two wells are identified as part of the Integrated Water Resources Master Plan (IWRMP) groundwater supply expansion efforts to be more independent from Metropolitan Water District imported water supplies. The two wells will enable the Water Treatment Plant to run more continuously, adding to the 20% average day demand supplied by groundwater.

City staff also coordinated closely with the Division of Drinking Water (DDW) to share technical findings and ensure regulatory alignment early in the process. These discussions helped confirm that the project meets applicable standards and supports a streamlined permitting process. DDW did not identify any concerns and encouraged continued coordination as the project advances.

Based on the technical evaluation and regulatory coordination, staff determined that it was appropriate to proceed with design for well equipping. Construction is currently anticipated to begin in the summer of 2027.

The equipping design phase started in January of this year. Based on the increased design scope needed to accommodate the additional constituents found in the ground water and to coordinate design elements of the Le Doux Well site with the future La Cienega Park master plan, the proposed amendment is needed to complete the work.

The proposed agreement amendment in the amount of $293,078 will enable KJ to complete the design and provide construction support services for the La Cienega Well #2 (LCW-2) and #3 (LCW-3) project through the closeout of the project. In addition, $65,000 is requested to replenish the contingency budget for a proposed change purchase order in the amount of $358,078.

FISCAL IMPACT
The fee for the services described above in Amendment No. 1 is $358,078 (including a contingency in the amount $65,000) for a total contract not-to-exceed amount of $1,936,117. Funds for this amendment are available in CIP 00916, La Brea Basin Well Development.

Shana Epstein,
Director of Public Works
Approved By
Attachment 1
1 1st Amend. to Gen/AP (1805732v6)
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY

OF BEVERLY HILLS AND KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS,
INC. FOR THE LA CIENEGA WELL #2 AND #3 DESIGN
NAME OF CONSULTANT: Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc.

RESPONSIBLE PRINCIPAL Jeff Savard, P.E., Vice President OF CONSULTANT:

CONSULTANT'S ADDRESS: 300 N. Lake Avenue, Suite 1020
Pasadena, CA 91101
Attention: Jeff Savard, P.E., Vice President
CONSULTANT’S E.I.N./TAX I.D. NO.: 94-214-7007
CITY'S ADDRESS: City of Beverly Hills
345 Foothill Road
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Attention: Director of Public Works
COMMENCEMENT DATE: December 6, 2022
TERMINATION DATE: Upon satisfactory completion of all work as required under this Agreement as determined by CITY
CONSIDERATION: Original Agreement:

Not to exceed $1,434,580, contingency for
additional services not to exceed $143,459; Total
not to exceed: $1,578,039 and further described in
Exhibit B
Amendment No. 1:

Additional $293,078.00; contingency for additional
services not to exceed $65,000.00
Total Not to Exceed:
$1,936,117.00, as described in Exhibit B
Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 2 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY

OF BEVERLY HILLS AND KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS,
INC. FOR THE LA CIENEGA WELL #2 AND #3 DESIGN
This Amendment No. 1 is to that certain Agreement between the City of Beverly Hills (hereinafter called "CITY") and Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc. (hereinafter called "CONSULTANT") dated December 13, 2022, and identified as Contract No. 752-22 (“Agreement”).

RECITALS
A. CITY and CONSULTANT entered into an Agreement for design of the La Brea Subarea water production well sites (LCW-2 and LCW-3) at La Cienega Park.

B. CITY and CONSULTANT desire to amend the Agreement to expand the Scope of Work to complete the design, increase the Consideration for the additional support, include a prevailing wage requirement, and revise the Schedule of Payment to compensate CONSULTANT for its continued services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

Section 1. The Consideration shall be amended as set forth above.

Section 2. Section 25, “Prevailing Wage,” shall be incorporated here as follows:
“Section 25. Prevailing Wage. CITY and CONSULTANT acknowledge that this project is a public work to which prevailing wages apply. CONSULTANT shall comply in all respects with all applicable provisions of the California Labor Code, including those set forth in Exhibit D, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.” Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 3 Section 3. Exhibit A, “Scope of Work,” shall be restated and amended as attached hereto and incorporated herein.

Section 4. Exhibit B, “Schedule of Payment and Rates,” shall be amended as attached hereto and incorporated herein.

Section 5. Exhibit D, “Terms for Compliance with California Labor Law Requirements,” shall be attached hereto and incorporated herein.

Section 6. Except as specifically amended by this Amendment No. 1, the remaining provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 4 EXECUTED the _____ day of __________________, 20___, at Beverly Hills, California.

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS
A Municipal Corporation
____________________________
SHARONA R. NAZARIAN, PsyD
Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________(SEAL)

HUMA AHMED
City Clerk
CONSULTANT: Kennedy/Jenks
Consultants, Inc.

JEFF SAVARD
Vice President

GERARD P. CAVALUZZI
Corporate Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
_______________________ ____________________________
LAURENCE S. WIENER NANCY HUNT-COFFEY
City Attorney City Manager
____________________________
SHANA E. EPSTEIN
Director of Public Works
_______________________ _____

DAREN GRILLEY
Assistant Director of Public Works/
City Engineer
____________________________
SHARON L’HEUREUX DRESSEL
Risk Manager
____________________________

ANTHONY RODSTEIN
Purchasing Services Manager

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 5 EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF WORK
Original Agreement:

CONSULTANT shall perform the following design and other consulting services for the new La Cienega Well #2 and Well #3 Project as outlined as follow:
 Project consists of the design, bid assistance, and engineering services during construction (ESDC) for two (2) new wells. The design and bidding of the two supply wells, well buildings, and approximately 2,500 feet of 6-inch diameter pipelines will be packaged as a single contract. A Basis of Design Report (BODR) will evaluate up to six well sites within La Cienega Park, up to five (5) well sites within the main La Cienega Park area east of La Cienega Boulevard, and one well site within Frank Fenton Field west of La Cienega Boulevard.
 The preliminary design will include hydrogeology, site renderings, and a high-level Due Diligence Analysis of environmental-related constraints for up to six sites to support the selection and recommendation for two sites. The final design will include hydrogeology, site renderings, CEQA compliance, survey, potholing, geotechnical investigations, landscaping, and detailed design for the two selected sites. Bid assistance will be provided. ESDC will be provided including a hydrogeologist representative for well drilling and testing. Construction management is not included at this time.  The Scope of Work includes eight tasks:
 Task 1 – Preliminary Engineering Services
 Task 2 – Permitting
 Task 3 – CEQA Compliance
 Task 4 – Site Investigations
 Task 5 – Final Design
 Task 6 – Bid Assistance
 Task 7 – Engineering Services During Construction (ESDC)  Task 8 – Community Outreach Support
 Task 9 – Meetings and Monthly Reporting
 Task 10 – Project Management and Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) General Assumptions
 It is assumed that the technical specifications will follow CSI 16-Division format. It is also assumed that CITY will develop the front-end documents (Divisions 0 and 1 in CSI format) with input from CONSULTANT.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 6  CONSULTANT’s schedule and compensation are based on providing the above services for a period of 33 to 36 months. This schedule provides 6 months for preliminary design, 12 months for design and CEQA, 3 months for bid and award, and 12 to 15 months for construction. The construction is approximately 6 months for well drilling and 6 to 9 months for well equipping, well buildings, and pipelines).
 CONSULTANT will manage work hours between tasks and employee classifications, and/or utilize other employee classifications, provided that the Project total fee is not exceeded without prior approval from CITY.
 CONSULTANT will use our standard CAD standards and technical specifications.  Estimate assumes drawings produced will be 2D and in AutoCAD format. CONSULTANT may use 3D tools to model and deliver the drawings, but no deliverable of 3D models will be provided.
 No Right of Away acquisition is anticipated for the pipeline facilities at this time.  The level of effort assumes that significant design changes are not required in progressing the design from 30% to 60%, 60% to 90% and 90% to 100% design submittals.  Traffic control plans will be specified for the construction contractor to prepare. The contractor will also be responsible for providing parking for their own workforce.  Site investigation subs are able to perform their work Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM. Night work, if required, will incur additional cost.  Permits to perform subsurface exploration within La Cienega Park and Frank Fenton Field for work, such as geotechnical borings or utility potholing, if required, will be provided by CITY at no cost to CONSULTANT’s subconsultants.
 Structures are assumed to be regular rectangular masonry structures with standard roof configurations and no structural irregularities. Structures are assumed not to require deep foundations.
 Assessments and design mitigations for environmental hazards, such as asbestos or lead, are not included.

CONSULTANT will prepare a Basis of Design Report (BODR) for the Project. The BODR will be prepared to succinctly document the assumptions, prior findings, and recommendations to be incorporated into the final design. The preliminary and final design services include Richard C Slade, Associates (RCS), as a subconsultant to CONSULTANT, for well drilling. CONSULTANT will perform preliminary and final design for well equipping, well buildings, and pipelines.

Task 1 – Preliminary Engineering Services
The preliminary design will include hydrogeology, site renderings, and a high-level Due Diligence Analysis of environmental-related constraints for up to six sites to support the selection and recommendation for two sites. The six sites are all located within La Cienega Park, with five well sites within the main La Cienega Park area east of La Cienega Boulevard, and one well site within Frank Fenton Field west of La Cienega Boulevard.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 7 Task 1.1 – Kick-off Meeting
Prepare for and attend an initial kick-off meeting with CITY and others to become acquainted with the individuals who will be associated with the Project and to discuss the scheduling for the Project, identify key milestones, identify Project contacts, etc.

Task 1.2 – Data Collection, Review & Analysis
Richard C Slade, Associates (RCS), as a subconsultant to CONSULTANT, will review in house files for subsurface geologic data and water quality data for historic wells in the region. Those data will be incorporated as part of the BODR. In addition, RCS will review with CITY any existing planning efforts or other well siting constraints for La Cienega Park.

While the IWRMP provided proposed locations for two new wells, those locations were preliminary only, and were not given significant input from CITY, particularly with respect to future development plans for La Cienega Park.

Task 1.3 – Field Reconnaissance
A field reconnaissance of La Cienega Park with CITY and the Project team will be performed.

This will be used to observe current site conditions and identify logistical issues associated with the proposed municipal-supply water well construction. Such site parameters that will be discussed and included in our BODR for the each of the two proposed new well sites will encompass the following:
 Size of site for the placement of drill rig equipment and accessories and for storage of well construction materials.
 Proximity of site to residences and schools (for noise mitigation & safety issues), particularly for the proximal house to the west/southwest of the subject property.  Presence of above ground and below ground utilities.
 Source of water for drilling.
 Location of and distance to storm drains or other possible drainage structures required for the proper discharge of fluids from well development and well testing.  Ingress/egress of construction equipment, particularly with respect to ongoing La Cienega Park use during well construction.

Task 1.4 – Evaluate and Rank up to Six Sites
Preliminary design criteria for each well pump and well building to include the following:
 Operating conditions – pumping water levels range for (1) high aquifer elevation and low production flow, and (2) low aquifer elevation and maximum production flow  Monitoring and Control – automatic start-up (water lube, blow-off, and production), flow metering, remote monitoring, and control
Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 8  Estimated electric loads, Southern California Edison (SCE) service request, transformer size and location. Switchboard, motor control center (MCC), and panel board size and locations. Control strategy, critical alarms, and SCADA communications  Preliminary Well Equipping Plan - Each site will include a preliminary layout of the proposed well building (with pump room and electrical room), equipping plan to include a vertical turbine pump, discharge piping (to existing raw water transmission pipeline), well blow off (pump to waste), valves, meter, electrical, and site fencing, if appropriate.  Special Construction- considerations for well building sound enclosures, well inspection and access, and CITY preferences for layout and site use will be documented under special construction.

CONSULTANT, including RCS for hydrogeology, Rincon for environmental, and The Terrazas Group for renderings, will jointly develop a ranking matrix to evaluate and rank up to six sites in order to recommend the two most favorable site for Well #2 and Well #3. One site visit will be conducted at the beginning of the Project and attended by up to five (5) CONSULTANT, including subconsultants. Both economic and non-economic ranking criteria will be developed along with weighting factors that will be reviewed with CITY. A multi-tiered matrix will take into consideration the merits of the individual sites as well as the distance between sites to minimize well interference when operating together.

Task 1.5 – Draft Basis of Design Report (BODR)
CONSULTANT will lead the preparation of the Draft BODR. CONSULTANT will establish the Project design criteria and preliminary design requirements for well equipping, the well buildings, and pipeline. CONSULTANT will review the design criteria, key issues, and site constraints. RCS will provide hydrogeologic analysis of the data and information generated during the above tasks and prepare the BODR sections with regard to anticipated subsurface geologic/hydrogeologic conditions at each of the proposed well sites. The BODR will include a recommendation for two proposed well sites.

RCS will estimate the well drilling construction and testing costs of the proposed new wells.

CONSULTANT will estimate the construction costs for the well equipping, well building, and pipelines. For the BODR, a Class 5 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC) will be provided based on the draft 10% design documents.

A Draft BODR will be provided for review by CITY.

Task 1.6 – Final BODR
After receipt of comments, CONSULTANT will incorporate those comments and prepare the Final BODR for the Project.

Deliverables:
 Ranking Matrix in Excel with access to weighing cells separate from protected cells  Tabulated comment responses from Draft BODR (Electronic PDF)  Draft and Final BODR (Electronic PDF)
Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 9 Task 2 – Permitting
This task is focused on gaining approval from the California Division of Drinking Water (DDW) for proceeding with the drilling of each of the two recommended wells: La Brea Well #2 and Well #3.

The task includes data collection and review, conducting a capture zone analysis, preparation of a Drinking Water Source Assessment and Protection Program (DWSAP), and preparation of a Draft and Final Source Water Assessment Program (SWAP) Reporting for each well.

Task 2.1 – Collect and Review Data
This task will entail conducting additional collection and review of available data with regard to known contaminant sources/plumes in the La Cienega Park Area. These data will be collected from online sources, such as the GeoTracker web site, maintained by the SWRCB, and the EnviroStor websites, maintained by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), for current information on known contaminant sources/plumes in the vicinity of the proposed well sites.

Task 2.2 – Data Analysis/Capture Zone
RCS will conduct a basic capture zone analysis of the future pumping of two proposed wells at La Cienega Park to determine the possible impact of the pumping of each well on groundwater beneath the area. It is expected that, based on DDW interaction, RCS will use an analytical element model to calculate the capture zones. The actual software used by RCS will be determined at the time of the analysis. Aquifer parameters, such as transmissivity and storativity, will be derived from prior testing work at LCW-1 (located south off La Cienega Park), and will be compared to data obtained from available data sources (e.g., GeoTracker) and from prior testing by others of former water wells in the area. Certain other parameters, such as testing of prior CITY wells (now destroyed), and/or the rates and duration of future pumping of the proposed new CITY wells, will be estimated during RCS’s modeling process for the proposed new municipalsupply wells.

Task 2.3 – Preparation of SWAP Report
After conducting our review and analysis of the available data, RCS will assess the vulnerability of the proposed future wells at La Cienega Park to potential sources of contamination to determine the vulnerability ranking based on the DWSAP program. RCS will prepare two SWAP reports; each report will include the following items.
 An inventory of potential contaminating activities (PCAs) in the region of the proposed well sites.
 An analysis of the vulnerability of these drinking water sources to contamination.

This shall also entail obtaining available information on current cleanup efforts of various contaminant plumes in the region and summarizing historic sources of contamination.
 Preparation of a capture zone map for the proposed wells. This capture zone map will be prepared based on two future wells that will be pumping continuously and simultaneously for periods of two, five and ten years.
 Compilation of the results of the assessment and a summary for the groundwater source(s) at the site.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 10 Task 2.4 – Define Limitations of Foothill WTP
CONSULTANT will review and evaluate the recent upgrades to the Foothill WTP and prepare the necessary portions of the SWAP reports that discuss water treatment.

Task 2.5 – Draft SWAP
RCS will prepare and submit an electronic copy of Draft SWAP Reports to CITY for review.

Task 2.6 – Final SWAP for Submittal to DDW
Following receipt of comments, RCS will provide CITY with final reports for submittal to the DDW.

Deliverables:
 DWSAP for La Brea Well #2 and Well #3
 Capture Zone Analysis and Map
 Letter report of Foothill WTP capabilities and limitations  Draft and Final SWAP Reports in Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format (PDF) Task 3 – CEQA Compliance
Rincon Consultants, Inc. (Rincon), as a subconsultant to CONSULTANT, will perform CEQA compliance either using an EIR or an IS-MND. For cost estimating purposes, an EIR has been assumed.

Currently, there are six potential well sites that will be reviewed to determine the appropriate two sites, one for each proposed well. Rincon will conduct a due diligence review to assist CONSULTANT in evaluating and ranking the alternative well sites.

Project Kickoff Meeting/Site Visit
Up to two Rincon staff (e.g., Project Manager, Principal-in-Charge, and/or Assistant Project Manager) will attend an on-site Project kickoff meeting with the Project Design Team and CITY to review existing site conditions and discuss the characteristics of the proposed Project. This scope of work assumes the kickoff meeting/site visit will be limited to no more than six hours, including travel and preparation time. This task does not include preparation of a meeting agenda or minutes.

Due Diligence Analysis
Rincon will conduct a high-level Due Diligence Analysis of the six potential sites for the two proposed groundwater wells that identifies potential environmental-related constraints associated with constructing and/or operating the Project. The analysis will be documented in a letter report, estimated to be approximately 5 to 10 pages in length, plus up to 5 figures. The Due Diligence Analysis will include a high-level desktop “fatal flaw” analysis that will include:

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 11  A high-level desktop evaluation of potential environmental constraints based on the topics considered in the Environmental Checklist in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines; the letter report will include a summary matrix to provide a side-by-side comparison of each site with respect to the environmental resource topics.  A list of required technical studies.
 A list of necessary environmental-related approvals/requirements/entitlements for the Project, including local land use approvals needed based upon the Project type and land use/zoning designations of the Project location.
 Estimated schedule and milestones for the Project’s review/approval process under CEQA.

This scope of work will provide a high-level desktop analysis and does not include field studies or CEQA level analysis. As part of this task, Rincon will review biological resources agencies’ databases (i.e., California Natural Diversity Database, California Native Plant Society Inventory or Rare and Endangered Plants) to determine if there is a potential for special-status species to occur on the six potential sites. Additionally, Rincon will request a cultural resource records search through the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) located at California State University, Fullerton using a 0.5- mile search radius around the Project area. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in-person appointments are not currently available at the SCCIC, and the SCCIC is currently responding to records search requests in 8 to 12 weeks. Rincon assumes SCCIC direct expenses for the records search will not exceed $800. Rincon will also review readily available historical maps, the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, the Built Environment Resources Directory, and the listing of California Historical Landmarks.

The draft Due Diligence Analysis letter report will be provided in electronic format (Microsoft Word and/or Adobe Acrobat) to CONSULTANT and/or CITY. We will revise the draft letter report based on up to two rounds of consolidated comments from CONSULTANT/CITY, to be provided in an electronic, editable format. This scope of work assumes no more than six hours of Rincon professional staff time will be necessary to revise the letter report based on CONSULTANT/CITY comments. The final version of the letter report will be provided in electronic format. This scope of work and cost estimate do not include providing a letter report that are accessible pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) or printed copies. However, accessible documents and/or printed copies can be provided for an additional fee.

Technical Studies
Once the Project area has been reduced to two Project sites, one for each of the proposed groundwater wells, Rincon will prepare Project-specific technical reports for cultural resources, hazardous materials/wastes, and noise, as described in subtasks below. Rincon will provide draft technical reports in electronic format for CONSULTANT/CITY review. Rincon will revise each draft report based on up to two rounds of consolidated comments from CONSULTANT/CITY, to be provided in an electronic, editable format. The final version of the reports will be provided in electronic format. This scope of work and cost estimate do not include providing technical reports that are ADA accessible or printed copies. However, accessible documents and/or printed copies can be provided for an additional fee. We have also included an Optional subtask for Rincon to Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 12 assist CITY with Native American consultation in accordance with Assembly Bill (AB) 52, if requested.

Cultural Resources Assessment
In addition to the SCCIC records search to be conducted under the Due Diligence Analysis Task above, under this subtask Rincon will contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) to request a Sacred Lands File (SLF) search. The SLF search will indicate whether recorded Sacred Lands are present within the vicinity of the two selected Project sites. The NAHC will also provide a list of Native American contacts for the Project, which will be provided to CITY; see Optional subtask for Rincon to provide CITY with assistance in initiating tribal consultation under AB 52. SLF requests may take approximately 8 to 10 weeks to receive. This subtask does not include communication by Rincon with the listed Native American contacts.

The Project sites currently consist of a landscaped La Cienega Park area with no visible native soils. Therefore, Rincon assumes no field survey will be required to complete the cultural resources analysis. Rincon assumes the cultural resources records search will be negative and no resources will be identified that require recordation, updating, or further evaluation. Therefore, a negative finding letter report is assumed to be sufficient for the Project. Rincon will prepare a brief letter report that includes a Project description, summary of background research, potential impacts to cultural resources (if any), management recommendations (if necessary), and figures.

If cultural resources are identified on the Project sites as a result of the records search, a change order will be requested to prepare a full technical report including a field survey.

Hazardous Materials and Wastes Technical Study
Rincon will perform a desktop “Environmental Study” to identify potential impacts from hazardous materials and wastes associated with the two Project sites. The Environmental Study will include identification of the following (as applicable):
 Known on-site and/or adjacent releases, including Cortese sites, through a desktop review of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC) EnviroStor database and the Regional Water Quality Control Board’s (RWQCB) GeoTracker database.  Solid waste landfills within 2,000 feet of the Project sites through a desktop review of the Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) CalRecycle resources.  California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) wells through a desktop review of well data.
 Former on-site uses of the Project sites through a desktop review of readily available historical aerial photographs and topographic maps.
 Buried hazardous material pipelines through a desktop review of the National Pipeline Mapping System database.
 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) investigations through a desktop review of the RWQCB database.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 13 The brief technical study will provide identification of hazardous material/waste conditions that could be encountered during Project construction and/or operation. Specific information regarding Cortese sites, landfills, hazardous material pipelines, PFAS, and CalGEM oil well records will be included in the technical study. If significant impacts are identified, mitigation measures will be developed to avoid or minimize Project impacts to the extent practicable. This subtask does not include any site visits or fieldwork.

Noise and Vibration Technical Report
To address potential noise and vibration impacts associated with the proposed Project, Rincon will prepare a Noise and Vibration Technical Report. The impact analysis will be conducted consistent with applicable CITY noise standards and guidelines. Rincon will conduct a field survey to ascertain existing noise levels at key locations within the two Project sites and the surrounding vicinity. Due to the potential for 24-hour construction activities, Rincon staff will collect up to eight short-term (15-minute) and up to two long-term (24-hour) ambient sound level measurements near the Project sites to determine ambient noise levels at the nearby sensitive receivers. No vibration measurements are proposed. Rincon will also conduct an analysis of similar well drilling activities at another location to empirically determine the proposed Project’s potential noise levels.

The well drilling activities to be measured would include the use of noise attenuation features such as barriers that may be applicable mitigation for the Project.

The potential for construction activities to impact nearby sensitive receivers will be assessed using construction noise levels generated by the Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) and the measured noise levels from similar well drilling activities. These noise levels will be analyzed in context of the Project’s noise increase over ambient noise levels. Construction equipment will be based on equipment types and operations provided by the client. In addition, the potential for construction traffic to result in traffic noise increases will be analyzed. Construction vibration will be analyzed at nearby vibration sensitive receivers. Vibration levels will be calculated based on published vibration levels associated with identified equipment and standardized and vibration propagation calculations. Project operational noise is assumed to be negligible due to well equipment being located within a structure and the operational traffic being limited to infrequent maintenance trips. Operational noise will be discussed qualitatively. If significant impacts are identified, appropriate noise reduction measures will be developed. As appropriate, mitigation measures will include the necessary barrier heights, operational restrictions, or other mitigation options to reduce noise levels to standards set by CITY, as practicable.

AB 52 Consultation Assistance
If requested, Rincon will assist CITY with Native American government-to-government consultation in accordance with AB 52. The purpose of AB 52 consultation is to identify tribal cultural resources within the two Project sites that may be impacted by the Project. Rincon will draft letters and a map of the two Project sites for CITY to send to Native American tribal government contacts, as well as provide CITY with a tracking table and instructions for successful AB 52 consultation. This subtask does not include attendance of meetings or direct contact with tribal organizations as part of the AB 52 consultation process. Rincon can attend AB 52 consultation meetings at the request of CITY for an additional fee.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 14 CEQA Compliance Documentation
As discussed with CONSULTANT and CITY, Rincon has included scopes of work for both a focused Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and an Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-MND). The appropriate CEQA compliance document will be determined based on the findings of the Due Diligence Analysis Task and the Project-specific technical studies. If, during further Project evaluation, Rincon determines potentially significant impacts could occur that cannot be mitigated to less-than significant levels, an EIR will be required, unless the Project can be redesigned to eliminate significant and unavoidable impacts.

Environmental Impact Report
Notice of Preparation/Scoping Meeting
Rincon will prepare a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Draft EIR. Upon CITY approval of the NOP, Rincon will circulate the NOP for the required 30-day review period. Rincon will be responsible for sending the NOP to the State Clearinghouse, County Clerk, and responsible and other concerned agencies. We assume up to eight hours of Rincon staff time to distribute the NOP and direct expenses will not exceed $350. If requested, Rincon can also assist CITY with other desired noticing such as newspaper advertising or radius mailing for an additional fee.

Rincon will prepare for and attend (virtually or in-person) an EIR scoping meeting during the scoping period. Rincon will make a brief presentation on the Project and environmental review process and will document public comments regarding the EIR scope. We will also prepare a summary of comments received at the meeting.

Administrative Draft EIR
The EIR will be prepared in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines, which set the standards for adequacy of an EIR. Specifically, the CEQA Guidelines state:

An EIR should be prepared with a sufficient degree of analysis to provide decision-makers with information which enables them to make a decision which intelligently takes account of environmental consequences. An evaluation of the environmental effects of a proposed Project need not be exhaustive, but the sufficiency of an EIR is to be reviewed in light of what is reasonably feasible.

Components of the Administrative Draft EIR are described below.

Executive Summary. The EIR will contain a summary of the proposed Project and associated environmental consequences. This information will be presented in tabular format to simplify review by decision-makers and the general public. This section will identify:
 Each potential environmental impact
 The level of significance of each impact
 Mitigation measures required
 Residual impacts after mitigation
Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 15 The summary will also note areas of known controversy and an assessment of the alternatives reviewed and their associated impacts. The summary will identify the environmentally superior alternative and rationale for its selection as such.

Introduction/Project Description/Environmental Setting. The introduction will describe the Project background, the environmental review process, and lead and responsible agencies. It will also provide an overview of the other EIR sections.

The Project description will provide details of the proposed Project, including construction and operation phases. Textual, tabular, and graphic presentation will be included as necessary to facilitate a thorough understanding of proposed physical changes.

The environmental setting will provide a general description of the character of the area. It will also include a list of cumulative projects or summary of cumulative buildout conditions for CITY of Beverly Hills that will form the basis for the cumulative impact analysis.

Environmental Impact Analysis. This section will include analysis of impacts determined during the scoping period to be potentially significant. The EIR analysis will evaluate the proposed Project relative to existing conditions. Each issue area analysis will include four main components:
 Setting (description of current conditions with respect to the issue area, including the existing regulatory environment)
 Impact analysis (discussion of potentially significant effects of the Project)  Mitigation measures (methods by which significant effects can be reduced or eliminated)  Level of significance after mitigation (discussion of whether or not proposed mitigation measures reduce impacts to below the adopted significance threshold) Rincon expects the EIR will focus on the following issues:
 Air Quality. The air quality analysis will analyze construction-related emissions associated with grading and/or excavation and heavy equipment use for pipeline and well installation. Criteria pollutants associated with construction of the Project will be calculated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) and/or Roadway Construction Emissions Model (RCEM) and compared to South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds. Toxic air contaminant emissions from proposed generators at the well sites will be described qualitatively, using conformance with SCAQMD permitting regulations for significance determination; no dispersion modeling is proposed.
 Geology and Soils. The geology analysis will be based on Project-specific geotechnical report(s) to be provided by CONSULTANT and/or CITY. The EIR analysis will focus on potential impacts associated with seismic activities in the region, potential concerns related to geology/soils from proposed construction and drilling activities, as well as operational activities. This section will also discuss potential impacts to paleontological resources.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 16  Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions analysis will analyze construction related emissions associated with grading and/or excavation and heavy equipment use for pipeline and well installation. GHG emissions associated with construction of the Project will be calculated using CalEEMod and/or RCEM. Operational indirect GHG emissions from the energy required to operate the wells and also any reductions in GHG emissions related to reducing the transport of water from outside the area (i.e., imported water) would be quantified. In addition, the Project’s consistency with applicable GHG reduction plans will be analyzed.
 Hydrology and Water Quality. The hydrology and water quality impacts analysis will be based on Project-specific hydrology and water quality reports to be provided by CONSULTANT and/or CITY. The EIR analysis will focus on whether the Project would result in substantial depletion of groundwater in the Project area and regionally, and/or significantly affect the quality of groundwater or surface waters.  Noise. The noise section of the EIR will summarize the findings of the Noise and Vibration Technical Report.
 Utilities and Service Systems. The utilities and service systems section will discuss the increase in demand for water treatment for the groundwater pumped from the proposed wells. The increase will be quantified and compared to existing capacity at CITY’s Foothill Groundwater Treatment Plant.

Other CEQA Discussions. This section will address such topics as growth-inducing impacts and significant irreversible effects. The growth-inducing impacts discussion will address population and job growth, removal of impediments to growth, and whether the Project may be considered precedent setting. The significant irreversible effects discussion will address the use of nonrenewable resources, changes to the environment that cannot be reversed, and any unavoidably significant impacts of the proposed Project.

Alternatives. We have scoped for the analysis of up to three alternatives, including the “no project” alternative. Evaluation of alternatives will be in less detail than for the proposed Project, although the analysis will provide decision-makers and the public adequate information to decide among the alternatives. Specifically, the analysis will determine whether each alternative’s impacts would be greater or less than those of the proposed Project, the magnitude of impacts (i.e., significant or less than significant), and whether mitigation requirements would apply. This section will also identify the “environmentally superior alternative.” If the “no project” alternative is determined to be environmentally superior, the EIR will identify the environmentally superior alternative among the remaining scenarios.

Rincon will provide the Administrative Draft EIR in electronic format for CONSULTANT/CITY review. This scope of work and cost estimate do not include providing an ADA-accessible Administrative Draft EIR or printed copies. However, accessible documents and/or printed copies can be provided for an additional fee.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 17 Public Review Draft EIR
This task involves the production, editorial work, and communication processes anticipated to publish the Draft EIR for public review and comment. Following receipt of CONSULTANT/CITY comments on the Administrative Draft EIR, Rincon will meet with CITY to review internal comments on the Administrative Draft EIR. Following this meeting, we will incorporate the CONSULTANT/CITY’s comments into the Draft EIR and submit a revised Administrative Draft EIR that will undergo another round of review.

California public entities are subject to the ADA and California Government Codes and must make an attempt to make their websites and documents accessible to the maximum extent possible (ADA Section 508 and California Government Code 7405). Accordingly, after incorporation of any additional CITY comments, Rincon will convert the Draft EIR into an ADA-accessible document for posting onto CITY’s and the State Clearinghouse’s websites. Rincon’s Accessibility Compliance Group will analyze and update the Draft EIR and the Rincon-prepared EIR appendices under the Due Diligence Analysis Task, so they pass the Accessibility Checkers, built into Microsoft Word. We will review, assess, and report on text color contrast issues and remediate illogical reading order issues, including applying or remediating the “alt text” associated with figures/images, as necessary. In addition, Rincon will remediate styling issues for identification and navigation, and check and/or apply usable bookmarks. It is noted this scope of work does not guarantee ADA Section 508 and California Government Code 7405 compliance, but does meet the requirement to attempt accessibility to the maximum extent possible given the undue financial and administrative burden accessibility may impose onto a public entity. Rincon can provide a more thorough review of the documents’ accessibility for an additional fee.

Rincon will submit the Screen check EIR to CITY for approval before Draft EIR publication.

Rincon will be responsible for preparation of the Notice of Availability and Notice of Completion, and circulation of the Draft EIR to the State Clearinghouse, County Clerk, and responsible and other concerned agencies. We assume up to eight hours of Rincon staff time to distribute the Public Review Draft EIR and direct expenses will not exceed $350. If requested, Rincon can also assist CITY with other desired noticing such as newspaper advertising or radius mailing for an additional fee. Rincon can also print hardcopies of the Draft EIR for an additional fee, if requested.

Final EIR
The final formal stages of the EIR process involve responding to comments, public hearings, and final publication tasks. Specific components of the Final EIR preparation are described below.

Responses to Comments/Administrative Final EIR. Subsequent to receipt of all public comments on the Draft EIR, Rincon will submit and prepare draft responses to comments, including any minor revisions to the Draft EIR text that may be necessary. We assume up to two rounds of CITY review of the responses to comments.

It is understood this Project is not anticipated to be controversial, and the primary issue of concern will be noise and hydrology. Public comments are therefore assumed to be minimal; as such, for the purposes of cost estimating, this scope of work assumes up to six comment letters will be received, including up to two lengthy (over three pages) and/or substantive letters, which can be adequately responded to in a maximum of 20 professional staff hours. The actual level of effort required to respond will depend on the length, detail, and sophistication of the comments, in Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 18 addition to the number of letters received. We reserve the right to reevaluate the effort level and request a scope amendment upon close of the public comment period.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. This task will include the preparation of a draft mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MMRP) for any identified mitigation measures. The MMRP will be prepared in a format that complies with CITY requirements. It will include a table that lists each mitigation measure, agency responsible for each condition, when monitoring must occur, the frequency of monitoring, and criteria to determine compliance with the conditions.

Publication of the Final EIR. Subsequent to approval of the responses to comments and Administrative Final EIR, Rincon will prepare the Final EIR, which will include the revised responses to comments and any text changes resulting from those responses. Once CITY has approved the text of the Final EIR, Rincon will confirm the document is ADA accessible. Rincon can also print hardcopies of the Draft EIR for an additional fee, if requested.

Rincon will prepare a Notice of Completion and Notice of Determination for review by CITY. Upon certification of the Final EIR, we assume CITY will be responsible for filing the Notice of Determination and payment of necessary filing fees, including the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s filing fee for an EIR (currently $3,539.25; note that the filing fee will likely increase on January 1, 2023), with the County Clerk. Rincon will also work with CITY to ensure the Final EIR, Notice of Completion, and Notice of Determination are submitted to the State Clearinghouse’s website.

Public Meetings
Rincon’s Project Manager or Principal-in-Charge will attend (virtually or in-person) up to four public Planning Commission and/or City Council meetings on the Project. Attendance will include oral presentations to the hearing body and graphic presentations, if desired. These hearings can be scheduled and selected at CITY’s discretion.

Project Management
Project management tasks include in-house management of Rincon staff during the course of this scope of work, responding to telephone calls and emails regarding the Project, monitoring the Project budget and schedule, and other similar tasks.

Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration
Administrative Draft IS-MND
Rincon will prepare an Administrative Draft IS-MND using CITY’s preferred format, based on the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G environmental checklist. Rincon will incorporate information from relevant and available technical studies to assist in addressing environmental checklist issues.

Where appropriate, impacts will be quantified in relation to established thresholds of significance.

A determination of significance will be made for each issue area and mitigation measures will be provided as necessary for identified significant effects. For the air quality and GHG emissions analysis in the ISMND, Rincon will analyze construction-related emissions associated with grading and/or excavation and heavy equipment use for pipeline and well installation. Criteria pollutant and GHG emissions associated with construction of the Project will be calculated using CalEEMod and/or RCEM and compared to SCAQMD thresholds. Toxic air contaminant emissions from proposed generators at the well sites will be described qualitatively, using conformance with Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 19 SCAQMD permitting regulations for significance determination; no dispersion modeling is proposed. Operational indirect GHG emissions from the energy required to operate the wells and to transport water from outside the area would be quantified. The indirect GHG emissions associated with the energy required to would also be quantified.

Rincon will submit the Administrative Draft IS-MND in electronic format for CONSULTANT and CITY review.

Public Review Draft IS-MND
Rincon will respond to up to two rounds of consolidated comments on the Administrative Draft ISMND from CONSULTANT/CITY, to be provided in an electronic, editable format. Upon approval by CITY, Rincon’s Accessibility Compliance Group will analyze and update the Public Review Draft IS-MND and the Rincon-prepared IS-MND appendices under the Due Diligence Analysis Task, so they pass the Accessibility Checkers, built into Microsoft Word. Rincon will review, assess, and report on text color contrast issues and remediate illogical reading order issues, including applying or remediating the “alt text” associated with figures/images, as necessary. In addition, Rincon will remediate styling issues for identification and navigation, and check and/or apply usable bookmarks. It is noted that this scope of work does not guarantee ADA Section 508 and California Government Code 7405 compliance, but does meet the requirement to attempt accessibility to the maximum extent possible given the undue financial and administrative burden accessibility may impose onto a public entity. Rincon can provide a more thorough review of the documents’ accessibility for an additional fee.

Rincon will provide a website-ready PDF version of the Public Review Draft IS-MND. Rincon will be responsible for preparation of the Notice of Intent to adopt an IS-MND and Notice of Completion, and circulation of the Draft IS-MND to the State Clearinghouse, County Clerk, and responsible and other concerned agencies. Rincon assumes up to eight hours of Rincon staff time to distribute the Public Review Draft IS-MND and direct expenses will not exceed $350. If requested, Rincon can also assist CITY with other desired noticing such as newspaper advertising or radius mailing for an additional fee. Rincon can also print hardcopies of the Draft IS-MND for an additional fee, if requested.

Final IS-MND
Upon receipt of public comments on the Draft IS-MND, Rincon will prepare draft responses to comments and the Administrative Final IS-MND. For the purposes of cost estimating, this scope of work assumes that up to five comment letters will be received, including one lengthy (over three pages) and/or substantive letter, that can be adequately responded to in a maximum of 10 professional staff hours. The actual level of effort required to respond will depend on the length, detail, and sophistication of the comments, in addition to the number of letters received. Rincon reserves the right to reevaluate the effort level and request a scope amendment upon close of the public comment period. Rincon will also prepare an MMRP, which will include a list of all mitigation measures as well as required monitoring actions, responsible parties for monitoring, and timing of mitigation and monitoring activities. Once CITY has approved the text of the Final IS-MND, Rincon will confirm the document is ADA accessible. Rincon can also print hardcopies of the Draft EIR for an additional fee, if requested.

Rincon will prepare a Notice of Completion and Notice of Determination for review by CITY. Upon adoption of the Final IS-MND, Rincon assumes CITY will be responsible for filing the Notice of Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 20 Determination and payment of necessary filing fees, including the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s filing fee for an IS-MND (currently $2,548.00; note that the filing fee will likely increase on January 1, 2023), with the County Clerk. Rincon will also work with CITY to ensure the Final IS-MND, Notice of Completion, and Notice of Determination are submitted to the State Clearinghouse’s website.

Public Meetings
Rincon’s Project Manager or Principal-in-Charge will attend (virtually or in-person) up to four public Planning Commission and/or City Council meetings on the Project. Attendance will include oral presentations to the hearing body and graphic presentations, if desired. These hearings can be scheduled and selected at CITY’s discretion.

Project Management
Project management tasks include in-house management of Rincon staff during the course of this scope of work, responding to telephone calls and emails regarding the Project, monitoring the Project budget and schedule, and other similar tasks.

Schedule
Rincon proposes to submit the draft Due Diligence letter within 3 to 4 weeks of the Project kickoff meeting. Rincon proposes to submit the draft technical studies for review within 12 to 16 weeks of receipt of Project site plans, methods of construction and construction equipment, and any background information necessary for the Project description. It is noted the SCCIC is currently responding to records search requests in 8 to 12 weeks.

If an EIR is the appropriate CEQA compliance document, the Administrative Draft EIR can be submitted for CONSULTANT/CITY review within 12 weeks of authorization to proceed on the EIR and receipt of the Project-specific site plans and technical reports from CONSULTANT and/or CITY. If an IS-MND is the appropriate CEQA compliance document, the Administrative Draft ISMND can be submitted within six weeks of authorization to proceed on the Draft IS-MND and receipt of the Project-specific site plans and technical reports from CONSULTANT and/or CITY.

The overall Project schedule is dependent on CITY review times and number and complexity of public comments.

Task 4 – Site Investigations
Task 4.1 – Topo Survey
Hunsaker & Associate (Hunsaker), as a subconsultant to CONSULTANT, will provide design surveying services, as follows:

Office - Preparation of Topographical Map, Plotting of ROW and Boundary lines, GPS Processing (NAD 83 Zone V and NAVD 88), meeting attendance, and coordination.

Research - Research, Centerline Ties and Record maps and Bench Marks to establish control.

Control - Establish horizontal and vertical control network (NAD 83, Bench Marks. NAVD 88).

Topographic Surveys – Topographic Survey for La Brea Well #2 and Well #3 sites along with +/-1,200 feet of well discharge pipeline area, 400 feet for sewer tie-ins, and 600 feet for Storm Drain tie-ins. For both well sites, once decided on by CITY, tie in any trees, curbs on street, catch Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 21 basin, power poles, buildings, fences, drainage structures, or any visible utilities. Shoot 50’ grid across said area for contour mapping. Tie-in sewer manhole and any storm drain manhole up and down the Street to help with tie-ins.

Potholes - Set up to 12 pothole locations for pothole contractor.

Task 4.2 – Potholing
AirX Utility Surveyors, Inc. (AirX), as a subconsultant to CONSULTANT, will provide utility locating, USA markout and pothole layout, potholing, traffic control plans, permits, equipment and all materials in support of this mission. No equipment will be left on site and all materials and work for a given work area will be opened and completed on a daily basis.

Project Management, Report Preparation, Research and Drafting AirX will provide a civil engineer for Project management, record research, pre-marking, and field meetings. AirX will prepare and submit a Pothole Report to CONSULTANT.

Traffic Control
AirX provides an all-inclusive traffic control service. AirX will furnish AutoCAD-rendered Traffic Control and Right of Way Plans (ROW) to facilitate permit approvals from CITY of Beverly Hills, City of Los Angeles, and/or the County of Los Angeles. AirX has highly-skilled and certified technicians and work zone flaggers to manage vehicle traffic. Equipment set-up and tear down are part of this service.

Potholing
AirX will pothole to the top of pipes, and to the top and bottom of encasements, however the bottom depths of pipes will need to be calculated by the CONSULTANT design team. Potholing includes excavation, visual observation, setting witness point, backfill, patching and documentation of depths and location of the utility on a record data sheet. AirX will pre-mark all of the pothole locations and notify Underground Service Alert (USA). AirX will pothole the facilities in accordance with USA Markout. If the requested utilities are not found or if USA Mark-out is incomplete and cannot be verified by AirX, CONSULTANT will be notified.

Assumptions and Materials:

All potholes will be no more than 8’ in depth.

Nine (9) potholes have been assumed as follows:
 3 PH’s will be within La Cienega Park and not required surface repair.  3 PH’s will be within sidewalk and CONSULTANT has requested that AirX cold patch.

Sidewalk Panel Replacement is not included.
 3 PH’s will be within CITY ROW & will require full TC Plans, Permits, Equipment & AC Hot Patching for 3 PH's only. Slurry backfill is not included.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 22 Task 4.3 – Geotechnical Investigation
Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical & Environmental Sciences Consultants (Ninyo & Moore), as a subconsultant to CONSULTANT, will provide geotechnical services to evaluate the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the well sites and to provide geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of the improvements associated with the new groundwater wells.

The subsurface exploration will include one new boring at each of the two well sites.

The geotechnical work will include the following:
 Project planning and coordination.
 Review of background data, including in-house geotechnical data, State of California Earthquake Fault Zone maps, State of California Seismic Hazards Zones Maps, topographic maps, geologic maps and literature, and stereoscopic aerial photographs.  A site reconnaissance to document the surficial geologic conditions. During reconnaissance, Ninyo & Moore will mark boring locations in the field for coordination with Underground Services Alert.
 Acquisition of a County of Los Angeles Environmental Health Department permit for drilling deeper than 10 feet below the ground surface.
 Coordination with CITY for permission to access La Cienega Park and Frank Fenton Field for performing our subsurface exploration.
 Subsurface exploration consisting of the drilling, logging, and sampling of two hollow-stem auger borings, one at each new well site, to a depth of approximately 20 feet, or refusal, whichever is shallower. The borings will be logged by a Ninyo & Moore representative, and bulk and relatively undisturbed soil samples will be collected at selected depth intervals for laboratory testing. The borings will be backfilled with grout in accordance with County of Los Angeles Environmental Health Department standards. Borings drilled in paved areas will be patched with rapid-set concrete or asphalt perma-patch.  Soil cuttings from the borings that cannot be spread on-site will be placed in 55-gallon drums for characterization and disposal. Drums will be disposed at a legal dump facility.  Laboratory testing of representative soil samples.
o Laboratory tests will include evaluation of insitu moisture and density, shear strength, consolidation, sieve analysis, Atterberg limits, and soil corrosivity.  Data compilation and engineering analysis of the information obtained from our background review, subsurface evaluation, and laboratory testing. Our engineering analyses and recommendations will include:
o Suitability of the sites for the proposed construction from a geotechnical perspective.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 23 o Description of the geology and soils anticipated during construction, including variability of soils across the site based on new and previous subsurface data. o Evaluation of potential geologic and seismic hazards, including surface fault rupture and liquefaction.
o Evaluation of site seismicity, seismic site class, and applicable 2022 California Building Code seismic design parameters.
o Geotechnical constructability issues and protection of existing facilities. o Excavation characteristics of the on-site materials, including anticipated difficult excavating, caving potential, and oversize material handling. o Fill material and compaction requirements, including suitability of the on-site soils for use as structural fill, bedding and pipe zone material, and trench backfill. o Evaluation of the depth to groundwater, as encountered in the borings at the time of drilling, and uplift and dewatering considerations.
o Evaluation of settlement potential for the new wellhouse and equipment pads, and appropriate ground preparation, including the presence of collapsible soils. o Evaluation of suitable foundation types including shallow foundations with allowable bearing capacities, friction coefficient, allowable passive pressures, and modulus of subgrade reaction.
o Evaluation of the corrosion potential of on-site soils.  Preparation of a Geotechnical Evaluation Report for the Project. The report will be illustrated with a site plan and boring locations, boring logs, and laboratory test results.

Ninyo & Moore’s report will present our findings, conclusions, and recommendations for the planned improvements.

Assumptions
The site is accessible to truck-mounted drilling equipment and geotechnical field services can be performed during normal working hours (Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.).

Ninyo & Moore will contact Underground Services Alert prior to performing the subsurface evaluation. CITY will provide any additional information regarding the presence of utilities.

Permits to perform the subsurface exploration within CITY La Cienega Park and Frank Fenton Field, if required, will be provide by CITY at no cost to Ninyo & Moore.

Ninyo & Moore’s scope of work does not include sampling, testing, or chemical analysis of soil, groundwater, surface water, or other materials for the purpose of evaluating possible hazards or risks other than those performed to characterize the drum(s) for disposal.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 24 Task 4.4 – Landscaping
NUVIS Landscape Architecture (NUVIS), as a subconsultant to CONSULTANT, will provide landscape architecture design services for two well sites as described below.

Data Gathering and Analysis
Based on the selected well sites, NUVIS will review CITY provided existing documents, plans for the two sites. CONSULTANT will provide a site review with digital imagery, documenting existing site conditions and note any site influences that may affect the landscape design solution. Typical reconnaissance includes, but is not limited to:
 Visually identifying: adjacent land uses, drainage patterns, existing infrastructure, pertinent visual characteristics, environmental conditions, site influences, and view potential/orientation and visual impact; and
 Evaluating: impact of pedestrian and bicycle circulation patterns, physical opportunities and constraints, maintenance needs, and interrelationship with current trails and recreation facilities.

In coordination with the design team, NUVIS will review the civil plans to confirm design recommendations in coordination with landscape design goals.

Investigations
NUVIS will arrange a site visit with CITY Park Operations Staff in order to inventory and survey the existing irrigation system condition.

Project Management during Final Design Phase
NUVIS will attend a Project meeting (kickoff for NUVIS) with the design team and CITY in order to receive information, discuss design direction, and receive milestone deliverable schedule.

NUVIS has allowed for up to ten virtual Project team meetings with CITY.

NUVIS has allowed for up 30 hours of government agency coordination for the Project. This task includes interface and coordination for day-to-day business communication not already delineated above, including, but not limited to: meetings (in-person/virtual), memos, email, and teleconferences/calls needed for a successful Project.

NUVIS has allowed for up to 6 hours of QA/QC services.

Preliminary Design
After completion of the data and site reconnaissance and inventory phase, and in coordination with the information received from the kickoff meeting, NUVIS will prepare preliminary planting plans for two well sites include landscape and irrigation around new pump house and park.

The concept plans will graphically illustrate landscape recommendations from plan view. A total of two full size exhibits will be prepared. A planting plan will be developed including digital imagery of recommended plant materials including botanical and common names. Plant material will be carefully selected to complement existing landscape and conform to CITY and Public Works Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 25 requirements. NUVIS will prepare a preliminary statement of probable construction cost to monitor the effect of the design solution on the budget.

Final Design
Approval of the concept plan will direct NUVIS to begin preparation of final design documents.

Landscape plans inclusive of planting plans and details, irrigation plans and details, construction plans and details, and appropriate notes. Plans will be prepared at 1”=20’ scale on 24”x36” sheets, conforming to all local, state, and federal requirements for outdoor spaces.

Technical specifications conforming to CITY standard construction methods and the Standard Specification for Public Works Construction (Greenbook) will be prepared.

A statement of probable construction cost will be prepared relative to bid item quantities.

NUVIS will submit plans to CONSULTANT for CITY/Agency plan check and review at 30%, 60%, 90%, and 100% completion. Corrections will be made prior to progressing plans to next stage.

Prior to Notice of Bid, NUVIS will provide CONSULTANT with signed and stamped reproducible electronic documents for inclusion in the bid package.

Task 4.5 – Utility Research and Notification
CONSULTANT will conduct utility research to identify utilities within the Project limits. Anticipated utilities such as water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, power, gas, telephone/telecom, and cable television will be contacted to solicit information and mapping for existing underground and overhead lines which may affect piping alignments and other elements of design.

Task 4.6 – Hydraulic Analyses
CONSULTANT will perform a hydraulic analysis to determine design parameters, points of connection, system pressures, hydraulic equipment sizing, and other parameters needed to support the preliminary and final design of the La Brea Well #2 and Well #3 Project. The two wells may have individual or one common connection to the existing raw water transmission pipeline that runs north in La Cienega Boulevard, west across Frank Fenton Field, and continues north on Le Doux Road for raw water supply to Foothill GWTP.

Deliverables:
 Topo Survey with Pothole Locations (Electronic PDF)
 Pothole Traffic Control Plans (Electronic PDF)
 Pothole Report (Electronic PDF)
 Geotechnical Evaluation Report (Electronic PDF)
 Landscape Plans, Specifications, and Cost Estimate (Electronic PDF, Word files)  Utility Research (Electronic PDF)
 Hydraulic Analysis (Electronic PDF)
Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 26 Task 5 – Final Design
Task 5.1 – Well Drilling Technical Specifications
For well drilling, RCS will prepare one set of Technical Specifications for the drilling, development, construction, and testing of the two new wells; both new wells will be included in a single Specifications and Bid package. The design of the wells will be based on the results of the pilot borehole drilling at the selected sites.

The Technical Specifications for the two new wells will provide the technical requirements for the following well construction issues for each proposed well:
 Site preparation activities (clearing, grubbing, grading).  Drilling/construction method for the well and drilling fluids control parameters and methods, along with parameters for plumbness and alignment of the pilot hole and final reamed borehole.
 Types and materials for sound attenuation for noise mitigation.  The pilot hole drilling depth.
 Details for performing isolated aquifer zone testing.  Depth(s) and diameter(s) of borehole ream(s).
 Casing material types, casing diameters and casing depths.  The type and size of casing perforations and lengths of such casing.  The depth(s) of possible deep cement annular sanitary seal(s) or aquifer seals.  The anticipated gravel pack gradation and depth placement.  Mechanical, chemical, and pumping development criteria.  Water quality sampling and analysis for isolated aquifer zone testing and for the final wellblend water quality samples.
 NPDES permit requirements, sampling, analysis, treatment, and compliance measures.  Step drawdown test and constant rate pumping test criteria.  Criteria and equipment for the final dynamic and static spinner surveys and depth discrete sampling.
 Final video survey, alignment survey and completion of each wellhead.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 27 Selection of casing materials, borehole, and casing diameters, required noise mitigation measures, onsite treatment and/or disposal of drilling fluids for the construction of the proposed wells and other aspects of the construction Project will be specifically tailored to the proposed new well sites.

Task 5.2 – Well Drilling Estimate of Probable Construction Costs RCS will prepare a detailed estimate for the probable cost of the drilling, construction, and testing of the two new proposed wells at La Cienega Park, exclusive of the permanent pumps, the wellheads, possible treatment, and aboveground appurtenances. The construction cost estimate will be based on recent Contractor costs (as determined from several of RCS’s other current projects). RCS will be able to provide CITY with a realistic expectation of drilling and construction costs for the proposed new wells, because of RCS’s numerous ongoing well construction projects and field experience with the various drilling contractors that would likely be submitting their bids on CITY’s Project. This RCS cost estimate will be especially useful to CITY in its budgetary considerations for the proposed wells.

Task 5.3 – Final Design for Well Equipping, Buildings, and Pipelines CONSULTANT will prepare 30%, 60%, 90%, and 100% design drawings for CITY’s review and comment. Responses to CITY’s compiled and reconciled comments will be provided after each review. Each progressive submittal will further develop the design details as well as incorporate comments from the previous submittal review. At 100%, the design drawings will be provided based on the 90% design documents.

An anticipated list of drawings is identified in Appendix 1 to this Exhibit A.

Technical Specifications
A list of proposed technical specifications will be provided with the 30% submittal. For the 60%, CITY’s boilerplate front-end documents (Divisions 0 and 1) will be reviewed, and proposed revisions will be provided by CONSULTANT. At 90%, the complete technical specifications will be provided to CITY, including revisions to Divisions 0 and 1.

Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC)
At 30%, a Class 4 OPCC will be provided based on the draft 30% design documents. At 60%, a Class 3 OPCC will be provided based on the draft 60% design documents. At 90%, a Class 2 OPCC will be provided based on the draft 90% design documents.

Deliverables:
 30% Design Drawings, List of Specifications, and Cost Estimate (PDT, MS Word files)  60% Design Drawings, Specifications, and Cost Estimate (PDF, MS Word files)  90% Design Drawings, Specifications, Cost Estimate (PDF, MS Word files)  100% Design Drawings and Specifications (PDF, MS Word files)  100% Bid Set Stamped and Sealed, Cost Estimate (PDF, MS Word files, 5 hard copies) plus AutoCAD files will be provided.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 28 Task 6 – Bid Assistance
CONSULTANT in coordination with RCS will provide bid assistance for a single construction contract.

Task 6.1 – Attend Pre-Bid Meeting and Field Site Walk
CONSULTANT, in coordination with RCS, will attend the pre-bid meeting and provide technical support to CITY staff relative to immediate contractor questions.

Task 6.2 – Response to Technical Questions from Potential Bidders CONSULTANT will prepare responses to questions and requests for clarifications as required and/or directed by CITY.

Task 6.3 - Preparation of up to Three (3) Addenda
CONSULTANT will prepare addenda to include the distribution of minutes and responses to questions received during the pre-bid meeting and to clarify items omitted or changed in the bid documents. Additional addenda will be issued, if required, to further clarify technical questions asked by bidders and as instructed by CITY during the bidding period. All addenda will be submitted to CITY for its review and approval. CONSULTANT assumes that up to three (3) addenda per bid package will be issued during bidding. It is assumed that CITY will distribute the addendum to all plan holders.

Deliverables:
 Conduct Pre-Bid Meeting and attend bid opening
 Respond to contractor questions and requests for clarifications. Provide electronic files, MS Word, and Adobe Acrobat PDF.
 Addenda (3). Provide Stamped and signed electronic files: MS Word and Adobe Acrobat PDF file.

CITY Responsibility:
 Coordinate and host Pre-Bid Meeting and Bid Opening
 Evaluation recommendation and Award contract
Task 7 - Engineering Services During Construction (ESDC) Task 7.1 – Attend Pre-Construction Meeting
CONSULTANT Team will prepare for and attend a pre-construction meeting with the selected General Contractor, major subcontractors, and CITY staff. The meeting may begin in the Public Works office and then move to the construction sites. The agenda will address key issues in the Technical Specifications and review the General Contractor’s proposed mobilization and scheduling of personnel and equipment to the site(s). CONSULTANT will assist in the discussions of the particular issues that the General Contractor should pay closer attention to and answer General Contractor questions.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 29 The field visit will better acquaint the drilling firm with the well construction sites and help define the logistical issues as the well sites, such as: nearest available water and electrical supply; placement of equipment with respect to buried utilities; and disposal of drilling fluids.

Importantly, it will be the driller's responsibility during this meeting to inform CITY what will need to be done to prepare the site for the required work, and when work will commence, including a detailed schedule for completing each task of well construction.

CONSULTANT will prepare written meeting minutes within five working days after the meeting.

Task 7.2 – Well Drilling and Construction Management Services Task 7.2.1 – Conductor Casing and Rig Mobilization
Provide a field geologist to observe the installation of the conductor casing into its borehole; log the drill cuttings collected by the driller; and perform telephone coordination during drill rig mobilization, drilling of the conductor casing, and installation of sound barrier walls. This Subtask is to help keep CITY informed on the progress of the initial General Contractor activities during mobilization and conductor casing installation. Installation of the cement seal will be observed by a Los Angeles County Department of Environmental Health Services (LACDEHS) inspector, who will be notified by the drilling company prior to pumping the cement into place.

Task 7.2.2 – Geologic Logging of Pilot Hole
Based on CONSULTANT’s review of subsurface data collected as part of our prior work in the La Brea Subarea for CITY, including work for the Integrated Regional Water Master Plan, it is anticipated that the drilling depth for the pilot hole for the subject La Cienega Park wells will be approximately 400 to 500 ft bgs. Thus, RCS anticipates that the average drilling rate by the reverse circulation drilling method could be on the order of 10 feet per hour at each well site; thus, the General Contractor will require approximately 50 hours of drilling time. Drilling is anticipated to be performed only during daylight hours so it is possible that such drilling could take between 7 and 12 days to complete per well. During drilling, the RCS geologist will be present on a parttime basis to geologically log the cuttings (formation samples) collected by the driller, because, in our opinion, there is sufficient control of the subsurface geologic data from existing nearby City wells and other historic nearby wells to warrant this part-time work at the site.

During pilot hole drilling, samples of representative formation materials will be collected by the Contractor during drilling to provide grain size distribution curves of these materials. Grain size testing is needed to select the final slot size for the casing perforations and the gradation of the final gravel pack. Grain size distribution tests will be performed on selected representative formation samples by the casing manufacturer. While onsite, the RCS geologist can be available to discuss drilling conditions and the results of in-progress geologic logging with CONSULTANT and/or CITY personnel; frequent emails will also be provided.

Task 7.2.3 – Downhole Geophysical Survey Log Analysis
RCS geologists will observe and review the downhole geophysical surveys (i.e., electric logs) of the pilot borehole at the well site. Review and compare data from geophysical logs (and the temperature log), along with the geologic log, to help select specific depth zones for the casing perforations.

Geophysical logging is conducted to accurately determine the depth(s) to, and the thickness and lateral continuity of possible water-bearing formations (aquifers) in the subsurface, based on their Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 30 electronic signatures. Geologic logging is used as physical evidence to help support any interpretations made on the depth and nature of subsurface materials penetrated. These data are needed to provide a recommendation for the specific water-bearing zones to target as part of the isolated aquifer zone testing, and to help select the final depths for placement of the required blank and perforated casing. The new E-log will be correlated to the E-logs previously performed in other La Brea Subarea boreholes recently drilled by CITY.

Task 7.2.4 – Isolated Aquifer Zone Testing
RCS geologists will observe downhole isolated aquifer zone testing of groundwater in selected aquifers in the pilot hole at the drill site. RCS will select specific depth zones on the basis of review and analysis of drill cuttings, the new E-log, other E-logs for wells and test holes drilled in the La Brea Subarea, and other subsurface data compiled for the La Brea Subarea. At this time, a maximum of three (3) zones are anticipated to be selected for isolated aquifer zone testing in the open pilot borehole. Such down-hole testing in the open borehole is important to help identify the possible presence of certain groundwater analytes and/or contaminants that may currently be present near the borehole.

RCS geologists will be present during the latter stages of zone development during temporary pumping with a submersible pump to collect samples for water quality testing. During pumping, our field geologist will observe/monitor the following field parameters in each test zone:
o Temperature
o pH
o Electrical conductivity (EC)
o Turbidity
o Possible hydrogen sulfide odors
o Static water levels
o Pumping water levels
o Pumping rates
o Calculations of possible specific capacity values
Monitoring of the above-listed parameters is necessary to help determine whether or not formation water is being produced and to help identify the rates of possible groundwater production from each tested zone. Further, the collected samples will need to be of sufficient clarity to obtain representative groundwater samples for water quality analysis. Monitoring of pumping water levels, static water levels and specific capacities of each zone will also provide preliminary data on the relative production capabilities of each zone. Costs for transport and analysis of the collected samples will be borne by the General Contractor, as will be required by the Technical Specifications.

Task 7.2.5 – Final Well Design Memorandum, Monitor Borehole Ream(s) and Caliper Survey
Communicate in-progress findings to CITY and CONSULTANT and prepare a Draft of the Final Construction Design Memorandum for the new well. A Draft of this Final Well Design Memorandum will be submitted to CITY and CONSULTANT for its review. Following receipt of any CITY or CONSULTANT comments, RCS will prepare the Final Design Memorandum and Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 31 submit it to CITY, CONSULTANT and the driller. This Final Well Design Memorandum will provide the Final recommendations for the following elements:
o Casing lengths and diameters.
o Type and depths of the perforations.
o Perforation sizes (slot sizes).
o The type and gradation of the gravel pack, based on testing of actual samples of selected drill cuttings.
o Depth of the cement seal(s) and bottom-hole seal (if needed). o Recommended depth of the test pump intake for development and testing.

Also, during this task, RCS will provide telephone communication with the driller during the final reaming of the borehole at the well site and will make one site visit to check on reaming operations.

When reaming operations have been completed, the RCS field geologist will review the results of the caliper survey of the final reamed borehole at the well site to help verify the appropriate depths and diameters for the ream have been attained.

Task 7.2.6 – Casing, Gravel Pack and Cement Seal Installation The installation of the casing, gravel pack and the cement seal is considered to be a vital task in the construction of the new well, because deviation from the recommended design could impact the production capacity of the well. RCS geologists will be present on a full-time basis to monitor, record and check for Contractor compliance with the Final well design during the installation of the recommended well blank and perforated casing, gravel pack, and cement seal for the initial well. Thus, such monitoring will be conducted to help permit conformance with the appropriate methods and materials in the specifications and/or recommendations based on downhole conditions.

During casing installation, RCS geologists will spot check the slot width of the casing perforations, observe and record the lengths of the blank and perforated casing being installed, and observe and record the type and amount of gravel pack and cement being emplaced downhole.

Task 7.2.7 – Well Development (Mechanical and Chemical Methods) Provide an RCS geologist on a part-time basis to monitor well development by mechanical and chemical methods for the new well. Monitoring development operations and checking for conformance with the Technical Specifications is useful because proper mechanical and chemical development of the new well is another vital activity during well construction. When onsite, the RCS geologist will spot check Contractor compliance with NPDES discharge requirements.

Task 7.2.8 – Well Development (Pumping Methods)
A RCS geologist will be present on a part-time basis to monitor well development by pumping methods. The geologist will also be present during start-up of pumping development and at other occasional time intervals to spot-check the progress of this pumping development. Contractor compliance with NPDES discharge requirements will also be spot checked.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 32 Task 7.2.9 – Step Drawdown Testing
RCS will provide a geologist to install a pressure transducer, and to also monitor step drawdown testing at the new well site, on a part-time basis. It is anticipated that three to four pumping rates will be recommended for this test. During testing, water levels in the new well will be recorded automatically with the use of an RCS pressure transducer, which will also be used to monitor and record water levels during the subsequent constant rate pumping test.

Task 7.2.10 – Constant Rate Pumping Test
Provide an RCS geologist, on a part-time basis, in order to monitor water level drawdown and recovery after the final constant rate pumping test (aquifer test). Critical times will be those during the first few hours of drawdown and recovery measurements. The Contractor's pump crew will also be used to conduct occasional water level measurements (using their electric tape sounder) to maintain the monitoring schedule recommended by RCS geologists. It is anticipated, at this time, that the constant rate discharge test will be 24 to 48 hours in duration. The RCS pressure transducer used during the step test will also be used during the constant rate pumping test to automatically record changes in water levels.

Field water quality values of pH, EC, T and turbidity of the well discharge will be obtained by the RCS field geologist during both of the pumping tests. Water samples of the final wellblend from the new well will be collected near the end of the constant rate test and delivered to a Cityapproved laboratory for water quality analyses.

At the end of aquifer testing, the Contractor will be required in the RCS-updated Technical Specifications to perform a flow meter (spinner) survey of the well to help identify the current flow regime of the various perforated zones in the new well. The Technical Specifications will provide for appropriately-sized camera ports/sounding tubes to permit this survey. In addition, RCS geologists will be present to collect depth-specific samples and a complete suite of Title 22 analytes, and the drilling Contractor will transport and have the samples analyzed at a StateCertified testing laboratory (which will be required by our Technical Specifications).

The accurate collection of reliable aquifer test data is important to provide an adequate analysis of aquifer transmissivities and production capabilities for the new well. Further, these data are used in conjunction with water quality data to establish the final wellblend water quality in the new well. Field monitoring of water levels in the new well during aquifer testing is vital in helping to determine the final operational pumping rate for the new well.

Task 7.2.11 – Casing Alignment Testing, Video Survey, Static Spinner Survey, and Well Disinfection
An RCS geologist will be present to observe a gyroscopic survey for the alignment/plumbness testing of the well casing, a video survey, and a static spinner survey. Further, for the video survey, it is important to check that the survey log is of sufficient quality to reliably document asbuilt well conditions. Finally, a static spinner survey can be performed to document the downwell flow regime under non-pumping conditions. Following these surveys, the Contractor will need to chlorinate the new well for final well disinfection.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 33 Task 7.2.12 – Recommended Pumping Rate and Pump Depth Setting Memorandum
Based on the step drawdown and constant rate pumping test data, RCS shall provide a Memorandum to discuss static and pumping water levels, and the current specific capacity for the new well. This Memorandum will also provide our recommendations to CITY for the final operational pumping rate and pump depth setting for the permanent pump; these parameters will include factors for anticipated declines in specific capacity over time and anticipated seasonal variations in water levels.

Thereafter, CONSULTANT engineers can provide all final design parameters for the permanent pump, wellhead, tie-in to the existing pipeline system, and other above ground structures/equipment.

Because of CONSULTANT’s working knowledge of the changes in pumping rates, specific capacity, well efficiency and annual volumes of groundwater produced by former/existing CITY wells, RCS recognizes that the original post-construction pumping rates from each new well during the final pumping tests will be greater than those that will eventually be available from each new well, over the long term. RCS will endeavor to account for the anticipated changes in pumping rates and volumes in each well over time by being conservative in its selection of a recommended pumping rate for the new permanent pump in each well. It is very likely that VFD pumps will be needed to help account for such changes in pumping rates and pumping levels over time.

Task 7.2.13 – Preparation of Summary of Well Construction Operations Report A Summary of Well Construction Operations Report will then be prepared to help document the drilling, construction, testing activities, and materials used during the construction. This report will include the following items:
 A basic chronology of well construction and testing.
 Description of earth materials encountered, including a copy of our geologic log.  Copies of all geophysical logs, including caliper and spinner surveys.  Results of sieve analysis, including plots of grain size curves.  Table of well construction materials and depths.
 As-built well design drawings.
 Field water quality results, water levels and discharge rates during zone testing and constant rate discharge tests.
 Analytical reports showing water quality results for isolated aquifer zone testing and the final wellblend sample.
 Well development logs from the drilling Contractor.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 34  Pumping test data for the step drawdown test, constant rate test and water level recovery measurements.
 Analysis of pumping test data, including well performance and plots of drawdown relationships as a function of flow rate and time.
 Assessment of potential drawdown interference between the new well and future CITY wells to be constructed in the La Brea Subarea.
 Evaluation of the spinner log data and depth specific water quality sampling under pumping conditions.
 Plumbness and alignment data.
 Other pertinent data relating to materials used.
 Conclusions and recommendations for basic operational use.

RCS will provide CITY and CONSULTANT with a Draft for review (without all supporting appendices) and then a Final Summary of Well Construction Operations report. The report, including all drawings, tables, and appendices, will be provided to CITY and CONSULTANT in Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF).

Two separate, independent reports will be prepared, one for each of the two new La Cienega Park Wells.

Task 7.3 – Construction Support for Well Equipping, Buildings, and Pipelines CONSULTANT will provide construction support, including office engineering, specialty inspection for electrical/controls, and field observation.

CONSULTANT will perform management tasks during construction that will consist of the following:
 Evaluate the acceptability of substitute materials and equipment  Identify, document, and mitigate field conflicts
 Participate in start-up and testing of the well pump
 Prepare final punch list items to be completed and corrected by the Contractor It is assumed that CONSULTANT will not need to provide full time engineer on-site to monitor and observe the Well Equipping or Pipeline construction progress.

Requests for Information (RFIs)
All RFIs received from the Contractor will be responded to in writing by CONSULTANT. RFIs will be directed to specific design team members who can most effectively develop timely responses Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 35 to the contractor. CONSULTANT will maintain a tracking log for RFIs so that topic, assigned responder and schedule are maintained. For purposes of this proposal, CONSULTANT has assumed that 50 RFIs will require review, with approximately 10 for Well Drilling and 40 for Well Equipping, Well Building, and Pipelines.

Shop Drawings
This task includes reviewing shop drawings, catalog data and other materials that the contractor is required to submit. CONSULTANT will review all submittals for compliance with the Contract plans and specifications. CONSULTANT has assumed a total of 80 shop drawings, with approximately 20 for Well Drilling and 60 for Well Equipping, Well Building, and Pipelines.

Construction Progress Meetings
CONSULTANT will conduct construction progress meetings and site visits on a monthly basis and as requested by CITY. At every visit, CONSULTANT will walk the Project sites with the Contractor to identify and discuss important areas and review identified problem areas. Up to 20 meetings (12 virtual and 8 in-person) are assumed. CONSULTANT will prepare an agenda for CITY’s review prior to the meeting and meeting minutes within five working days after the meeting.

This task includes the assignment and coordination of our technical resources, scheduling, and tracking construction progress. CONSULTANT will provide periodic progress updates to CITY by phone, e-mail, or in person. All deliverables will be reviewed in our in-house Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) process prior to submittal.

Electrical Inspection
CONSULTANT will perform specialty inspection during installation of electrical equipment and appurtenances. For the purposes of this proposal, a total of 16 hours is assumed for this task.

Clarification and Change Orders
CONSULTANT will assist CITY staff with review of requests for contract change orders received from the contractor to determine if said requests are warranted. If a change order request is not warranted, CONSULTANT will assist CITY staff in preparing a rejection letter to the contractor. If a change order request appears justified, CONSULTANT will evaluate proposed costs and review the change with CITY staff and assist with preparing a contract change order for processing by CITY. The scope of this task includes review and responding to four (4) contract change orders.

Task 7.4 – Record Drawings
Based on red-lined markups and construction records that have been maintained on site by the Contractor and construction manager during the Project and on additional information provided by CITY, CONSULTANT will prepare record drawings upon completion of construction. When complete and reviewed by CITY, CONSULTANT will submit a compact disk with electronic versions of the record drawings (CAD and pdf).

Task 8 - Public Outreach Support
CONSULTANT Key Staff (Principal-in-Charge and Project Manager) will prepare for and participate in outreach meetings and public meetings, as needed, to support CITY.

CONSULTANT will prepare support materials including maps, exhibits, brochures, notices, Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 36 mailers, and presentations. This task is budgeted at approximately 108 hours of public outreach support services.

Deliverables:
 Contribute to and/or review outreach content
 Participation in a total of four (4) 2-hour meetings
Task 9 – Meetings and Monthly Reports
Task 9.1 – Biweekly (Virtual) Coordination Meetings
CONSULTANT Team will participate in a 30-minute Biweekly Call via Microsoft Teams with a standard agenda to:
 Review work completed during the latest report period.  Present work anticipated to be completed during the next reporting period; and,  Identified problems/issues that could affect Project budget or schedule, outstanding issues to be resolved, and action items.

The calls will regularly be attended BY CONSULTANT’s Principal in Charge and Project Manager, with subs involved such as RCS for well drilling design and Rincon for environmental issues.

Task 9.2 – Design Progress Meetings
CONSULTANT will make four sets of presentations to CITY, Public Works Commission, and City Council at the completion of key engineering and/or environmental milestones. CONSULTANT will provide a draft of the presentations to CITY staff for review and comment prior to the meetings.

In addition, CONSULTANT will conduct four (4) Design Review meetings (two virtual and two inperson). The anticipated meetings consist of:
 Basis of Design Review Meeting
 30% Design Review Meeting
 60% Design Review Meeting
 90% Design Review Meeting
Meetings will be attended by CONSULTANT’s Project Manager and Design Manager; other staff will attend meetings, as needed. For Project meetings, CONSULTANT will prepare and distribute draft agenda prior to each meeting. Minutes will be prepared after each meeting.

Task 9.3 – Monthly Reports
CONSULTANT will prepare and submit a concise monthly status report with the monthly invoice statement that includes:

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 37  A summary of work progress/items complete for all work tasks;  A summary of expenditures by task showing total budget, billing-to-date, current billing, remaining amount, and percent complete; and,
 A summary of work to be performed in the upcoming month and any outstanding issues that need resolution.

Deliverables:
 Design Review Meeting Agenda and Minutes
 Monthly Invoices with Monthly Reports
Task 10 – Project Management and QA/QC
This task consists of Project management and coordination activities as well as quality control/assurance, and internal meetings with the Project team.

Task 10.1 – Project Management
Project coordination and administration will be provided, consisting of invoicing, schedule and budget monitoring, team coordination, and contract administration. It is assumed that the Project duration is 33 to 36 months.

Task 10.2 – Project Schedule
CONSULTANT will prepare and maintain a CPM Project schedule which will be updated after each design milestone as part of the monthly progress reports.

Task 10.3 – Quality Control (QA/QC)
Project deliverables will undergo quality reviews prior to submittal to CITY in accordance with CONSULTANT’s Quality Control Program. A concept & criteria review meeting will be conducted to review Project approach and methodology early in the process. As the Project is executed, other QC reviews are performed at appropriate milestones, which are generally associated with submittals to CITY.

Deliverables:
 Design Review Meeting Agenda and Minutes
 Monthly Invoices with Monthly Reports
Amendment No. 1
The following Scope of Work shall be considered a revised work plan to the original Agreement that incorporates air‑quality protection measures and CITY’s new Le Doux Well building concept.

The plan also includes the removal of scope items related to landscape design, permitting support, CEQA support, and community outreach. Tasks 2, 3, 6, 7 and 8 remain the same as described in Exhibit A of the Original Agreement.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 38 CONSULTANT shall perform the following updated design and other consulting services in connection to the following Tasks:

Task 1 - Preliminary Engineering Services
Task 1.5 – Update Draft Basis of Design Report (BODR)
CONSULTANT will provide an updated draft BODR to incorporate the revised Le Doux Well site and building design, provided as Appendix 2 to Exhibit A. The heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) design for the well buildings will include mitigation measures for potential hydrogen sulfide and methane exposure consisting of continuous ventilation, ventilation monitoring and alarming, and combustible gas detection. An updated Class 4 Opinion of Probably Construction Cost (OPCC) will be provided.

Deliverables:

Updated Draft BODR (Electronic PDF)
Task 4 – Site Investigations
Task 4.1 – Topo Survey
Hunsaker & Associate (Hunsaker), as a subconsultant to CONSULTANT, will provide design surveying services. A topographic survey, boundary survey, and aerial mapping will be provided for the site limits defined by the yellow boundary shown in Figure 1.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 38 CONSULTANT shall perform the following updated design and other consulting services in connection to the following Tasks:

Task 1 - Preliminary Engineering Services
Task 1.5 – Update Draft Basis of Design Report (BODR)
CONSULTANT will provide an updated draft BODR to incorporate the revised Le Doux Well site and building design, provided as Appendix 2 to Exhibit A. The heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) design for the well buildings will include mitigation measures for potential hydrogen sulfide and methane exposure consisting of continuous ventilation, ventilation monitoring and alarming, and combustible gas detection. An updated Class 4 Opinion of Probably Construction Cost (OPCC) will be provided.

Deliverables:

Updated Draft BODR (Electronic PDF)
Task 4 – Site Investigations
Task 4.1 – Topo Survey
Hunsaker & Associate (Hunsaker), as a subconsultant to CONSULTANT, will provide design surveying services. A topographic survey, boundary survey, and aerial mapping will be provided for the site limits defined by the yellow boundary shown in Figure 1.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 39 Figure 1: Survey Extent
Task 4.2 – Potholing
AirX Utility Surveyors, Inc. (AirX), as a subconsultant to CONSULTANT, will provide utility locating, USA markout and pothole layout, potholing, traffic control plans, permits, equipment and all materials in support of this mission. No equipment will be left on site and all materials and work for a given work area will be opened and completed on a daily basis. An additional three (3) potholes will be provided. Given that most of the potholes are assumed to be in the public street right-of-way, an additional eight (8) traffic control plans will be developed.

Task 4.3 – Geotechnical Investigation
Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical & Environmental Sciences Consultants (Ninyo & Moore), as a subconsultant to CONSULTANT, will provide geotechnical services to evaluate the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the well sites and to provide geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of the improvements associated with the new groundwater wells.

The final geotechnical report was submitted in July 2025, which provided geotechnical recommendations in accordance with the 2022 California Building Code (CBC). The report will be updated to provide geotechnical recommendations in accordance with the 2025 CBC and the American Society of Civil Engineer Publication 7-22, as appropriate. In addition, the new concept Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 40 design for the Le Doux Well Site (Well #2) will be partially buried. Based on Appendix 2 to Exhibit A, the building retaining wall is discontinuous, curved, and will be more than 10 feet tall. The updated report will include performing additional engineering analysis and providing geotechnical design recommendations for new retaining walls and other associated site improvements.

Task 4.4 – Landscaping
The landscaping design will be deleted in its entirety.

Task 4 Deliverables:

Topo Survey with Pothole Locations
Pothole Traffic Control Plans
Pothole Report
Geotechnical Evaluation Report
Task 5 – Final Design
Task 5.3 – Final Design for Well Equipping, Buildings, and Pipelines The design documents will incorporate the following assumptions:
 The final well equipping design will reflect the revised design concept for the Le Doux Well, as shown in Appendix 2 to Exhibit A.
 The Gregory Well building will continue to be a simple CMU block building.  The site improvements, fencing, and gate shown in Appendix 2 to Exhibit A will be provided by CITY under separate contract.
 The mechanical equipment layout of the well sites is assumed to be identical.  The heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) design for the well buildings will include mitigation measures for potential hydrogen sulfide and methane exposure consisting of continuous ventilation, ventilation monitoring and alarming, and combustible gas detection.
 Hydraulic modeling and hydraulic profiles are not included. It is assumed CITY will provide the required hydraulic grade for the discharge pressure of the two wells.  Designs for pipe supports, pipe anchorage, and equipment anchorage will be deferred to the construction contractor.
 Surge transient analysis is not included. Pipelines will be sized to maintain velocities that minimize surge risk.

Deliverables:
 30% Design Drawings, List of Specifications, and Cost Estimate (PDF, Microsoft Word files)
 60% Design Drawings, Specifications, and Cost Estimate (PDF, Microsoft Word files)  90% Design Drawings, Specifications, Cost Estimate (PDF, Microsoft Word files)  100% Design Drawings and Specifications (PDF, Microsoft Word files)  100% Bid Set Stamped and Sealed, Cost Estimate (PDF, Microsoft Word files, five (5) hard copies) plus AutoCAD files will be provided.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 41 Task 9 – Meetings and Monthly Reports
Task 9.1 – Biweekly (Virtual) Coordination Meetings
CONSULTANT team will participate in a 30-minute Biweekly Call via Microsoft Teams with a standard agenda to:
 Review work completed during the latest report period;  Present work anticipated to be completed during the next reporting period; and  Identified problems/issues that could affect project budget or schedule, outstanding issues to be resolved, and action items.

The calls will regularly be attended CONSULTANT’s PM and PE, and is assumed to go through the completion of the bidding process, which is assumed to end in March 2027.

Task 9.3 – Monthly Reports
CONSULTANT will prepare and submit a concise monthly status report with the monthly invoice statement that includes:
 A summary of work progress/items complete for all work tasks;  A summary of expenditures by task showing total budget, billing-to-date, current billing, remaining amount, and percent complete; and
 A summary of work to be performed in the upcoming month and any outstanding issues that need resolution.

It is assumed that the project will be completed in August 2028.

Deliverables:

Design Review Meeting Agenda and Minutes
Monthly Invoices with Monthly Reports
Task 10 - Project Management and QA/QC
This task consists of project management and coordination activities as well as quality control/assurance, and internal meetings with the project team.

Task 10.1 - Project Management
Project coordination and administration will be provided, consisting of invoicing, schedule and budget monitoring, team coordination, and contract administration. It is assumed that the project will be completed in August 2028.

Task 10.2 – Project Schedule
CONSULTANT will prepare and maintain a CPM project schedule which will be updated after each design milestone as part of the monthly progress reports.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 42 Task 10.3 - Quality Control (QA/QC)
Project deliverables will undergo quality reviews prior to submittal to CITY in accordance with CONSULTANT s’ Quality Control Program. A concept & criteria review meeting will be conducted to review project approach and methodology early in the process. As the project is executed, other QC reviews are performed at appropriate milestones, which are generally associated with submittals to CITY.

Deliverables:

Design Review Meeting agenda and minutes
Monthly invoices with monthly reports
Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 43 APPENDIX 1 TO EXHIBIT A

ANTICIPATED LIST OF DRAWINGS
TABLE 1: LIST OF DRAWINGS
G-1: TITLE SHEET
G-2: DRAWING LIST AND CIVIL/MECH SYMBOL
G-3: GENERAL GRADING AND CONTROL NOTES
G-4: LEGEND & ABBREVIATION
C-1: EXISTING SITE & DEMO PLAN
C-2: SITE PLAN
C-3: HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN
C-4: TEMP GRADING PLAN
C-5: FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
C-6: SITE GRADING SECTIONS
C-7: YARD PIPING PLAN
C-8: SEWER PIPING PLAN AND PROFILE
C-9: DRAINAGE PLAN AND PROFILE
C-10: STORM DRAIN LATERAL PROFILE
CD-1: CIVIL DETAILS - 1
CD-2: CIVIL DETAILS - 2
S-1: STRUCTURAL NOTES - 1
S-2: STRUCTURAL NOTES - 2
S-3: STRUCTURAL NOTES - 3
S-4: STRUC OBSERVATION & SPECIAL INSPECTION NOTES
S-5: WELL BUILDING FOUNDATION PLAN
S-6: WELL BUILDING ROOF PLAN
S-7: BUILDING SECTIONS
S-8: WALL SECTIONS AND ELEVATION
S-9: ROOF ADDITIONAL REINFORCING AT HATCH DETAILS
S-10: ROOF REINFORCING DETAILS
S-11: WELL BUILDING STRUCTURAL DETAILS - 1
S-12: WELL BUILDING STRUCTURAL DETAILS - 2
S-13: BUILDING CMU TYPICAL DETAILS
S-14: BUILDING TYPICAL DETAILS
SD-1: PIPE AND VENT DETAILS
SD-2: STANDARD DETAILS
A-1: ARCH GENERAL NOTES, SYMBOLS & CODES
A-2: ARCH FLOOR PLAN AND REFLECTED CEILING PLAN
A-3: ARCH ROOF PLAN AND DETAILS
Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 44 A-4: ARCH EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND BLDG SECTION
A-5: DOOR SCHEDULE & DETAILS
AD-1: ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS
H-1: HVAC ABBREVIATIONS, NOTES, AND LEGEND
H-2: HVAC SCHEDULES AND DETAILS
H-3: HVAC WELL #2 BUILDING PLAN AND SECTIONS
H-4: HVAC WELL #3 BUILDING PLAN AND SECTIONS
M-1: MECHANICAL ABBREVIATIONS AND NOTES
M-2: MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES
M-3: WELL #2 PUMP AND BUILDING PLAN AND SECTIONS
M-4: WELL #3 PUMP AND BUILDING PLAN AND SECTIONS
M-5: WELL EQUIPMENT SCHEMATIC - 1
M-6: WELL EQUIPMENT SCHEMATIC - 2
MD-1: MECHANICAL DETAILS
E-1: ELECTRICAL ABBREVIATIONS AND NOTES
E-2: ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS - 1
E-3: ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS - 2
E-4: ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN
E-5: SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM AND MCC ELEVATION
E-6: PANELBOARD AND LUMINAIRE SCHEDULES
E-7: CONTROL SCHEMATICS
E-8: CONDUIT BLOCK DIAGRAM
E-9: CONDUIT AND CABLE SCHEDULES
E-10: WELL PUMP ROOM ELECTRICAL PLAN
E-11: WELL PUMP ROOM LIGHTING, RECEPTACLE AND GROUNDING PLAN E-12: ELECTRICAL ROOM ELECTRICAL PLAN
E-13: ELECTRICAL ROOM LIGHTING, RECEPTACLE AND GROUNDING PLAN ED-1: ELECTRICAL DETAILS - 1
ED-2: ELECTRICAL DETAILS - 2
I-1: INSTRUMENTATION SYMBOLS AND NOTES
I-2: NETWORK BLOCK DIAGRAM
I-3: CONTROL PANEL WIRING DIAGRAM
I-4: CONTROL PANEL EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONS AND BOM
I-5: WELL #2 PROCESS & INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAM
I-6: WELL #3 PROCESS & INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAM
ID-1: INSTRUMENTATION DETAILS
L-1: LANDSCAPING PLANS
L-2: LANDSCAPING PLANS
L-3: IRRIGATION PLANS
L-4: IRRIGATION PLANS
Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 45 APPENDIX 2 TO EXHIBIT A

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E SEPTEMBER 2025
I

LA CIENEGA PARK - LE DOUX WELL PUMP
75% SCHEMATIC DESIGN

LA CIENEGA PARK - LE DOUX WELL PUMP- CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS 46 Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E

SITE APPROACH
o EXIS TINO CONDITION
£XS TIN FACILITIES

AND SITE CONTEXT
@ r WELL PUMP "\

STRUCTURE

SENSITIVE TO ADJACENT

RESIDENTIAL NEIBORHOOD
o ACTIVE RECREATION

SUPPORT SPORTS

PROGRAMMING ON SITE
@ PARK SIDE

COMPLETE THE BOUNDRY

FROM THE PARK SIDE
0 PUBLIC SIDE l: CONCfAI. THE EQUIPMENT M PUBLIC RIOHT OF WAY I
N
C) 0LPc BLVD
SEPTEMBER 2025 LA CIENEGA PARK - LE DOUX WELL PUMP- CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS 47 Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E

EXTERIOR ACTIVATION - STREET VIEW I

STREET CORNER
SEPTEMBER 2025 LA CIENEGA PARK -LE DOUX WELL PUMP - CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS 48 Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E

EXTERIOR ACTIVATION - STRATEGIES I
Low maintenance,
native planting
on park side,
decomposed granite
or porous pavers on
sidewalk side
Provide seating or
public art along
sidewalk, slope
ground to avoid
encampment
opportunities

SIDEWALK PROGRAM

GROUND COVER

STREET CORNER AERIAL
GATE
l' tall vertical post
fence achnored into
sub-grade concrete

FENCE &FALL

PROTECTION

TREE CANOPY
a· tall gate for access
to well pump and
exterior equipment
Add 3-4 trees to
reconnect canopy
perimeter
75 SEPTEMBER 2025 LA CIENEGA PARK -LE DOUX WELL PUMP- CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS 49 Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E

EXTERIOR ACTIVATION - STRATEGIES I

GROUND COVER

SIDEWALK PROGRAM
Low maintenance,
native planting
on park side,
decomposed granite
or porous pavers on
sidewalk side
Provide seating or
public art along
sidewalk, slope
ground to avoid
encampment
opportunities

STREET CORNER AERIAL
GATE
l' tall vertical post
fence achnored into
sub-grade concrete

FENCE&FALL E

PROTECTION

TREE CANOPY
Add 3-4 trees to
reconnect canopy
perimeter
8 tall gate for access
to well pump and
exterior equipment
i5
SEPTEMBER 2025 LA CIENEGA PARK- LE DDUX WELL PUMP - CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS 50 Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E

EXTERIOR ACTIVATION - WELL PUMP ACCESS

ACCESS HATCH
1 o· x 1 o· roof hatch.
centered above well
pump access point

SLOPED ROOF
Roof sloped to avoid
debris collection and
reduce incentive for
climbing into the
secure zone
ACCESS DOORS =
Exterior access to
electrical room, well
pump, and well pump
housing room - all
panic hardware to
swing outwards

LE DOUX ELEVATION
SEPTEMBER 2025
I
GATE
8' tall gate for access
to well pump and
exterior equipment

GROUND COVER
Concrete drive aisle
to pump access door.
decomposed granite
or porous pavers
surround

LA CIENEGA PARK- LE DOUX WELL PUMP - CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS 51 Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E

CONSTRUCTION TYPE

IN PROCESS

ASSUME CONCRETE RETAINING WALLS

ASSUME CONCRETE SLAB

ASSUME SLOPED STEEL FRAME ROOF
SEPTEMBER 2025
I

LA CIENEGA PARK - LE DOUX WELL PUMP - CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS 52 Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E

DETAILS
... ···--·········--··'· -- I

IN PROCESS
WELL PUMP ACCESS??
i
i ·
] i, I
l
,...,,,.,,.,.,.....,.,..· · ..... l .. ·-- ... -�,,.,..,. ..... i
I
I
I
!
SEPTEMBER 2025 LA CIENEGA PARK-LE DDUX WELL PUMP - CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS 53 Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E

ROOF ACCESS I
Debi it ob boo.ti.r cut0es.f 0.Gd«.a«rt Cort.eOtte6a.o rt Thro.al bron no4ate« not .die do.bi.if eag-
.2±2AA:
044.

Mt f
. d±: o a. 0eo "
dt.Ad
. AT=±
IE#±"
4 t
uni
r Lr40
«
et
.
:z:Zee
4re.tot

6.«ed
ot tee

4.4 ire nn
Lao.teer
·m
l
.

I
1; l+ ?
al
I
ir sorter t te aes nwr.8it.Ctn tutor aerct sots wt your toneetyour oes ae rtirerent orttBu er yr ii erereenttv
Standard Sizes and Shipping Weights
Roof Access Hatches
[Bisi]

SUE TEEL TEEL CURB A A UNUM TAINLEA STEEL
APPLCATON ALUMNuM COVER tta4rd realty90.
tilt) It u'rt odd = in.h � Mod • ewe_u'rt, - b
L.Ace.
o 4 » a $ ]no] e a t¢ w wco m r a « «
¢
• t ... ,. 4494 ta ] a .. t- ] voe] s t-Ar t2 .. t4oT .. .. tar r ..

Lee
eC.. 8xo 4 l. or.f6er .... 1 ,. 0-Ac «4t M el.
dyed
.le 044 IIIOXl:o? - .. o -] a]a - , .. .. -c tr ,. .... .. .

At 0Aw x2 -at 2 O Corf6en o-o. "" ., el. Cerny
.«0 0Ai Ma La 44 gt -]=] L- "" ts ..... o4 1 4o 4 r
KO 4x vw ... - Corf6en -w .. .. -vMs , .. . -av ...
e
b t ea 0Kw Kt2 w . .. Corn.for -rw +arc arw ar - « ., Car.fry ooh
0 a 6»aw 1r « er.fr L-ov tr .. er.leery av r «
t.le. «« t2x12% Larr r- ]m] rat 2 . ate 27% t.2 Car.er
o 4 -pc e tr er.for -or c .. l Car.dory
-- ..... 44914 t-axe ]«r ... or.fer t-or tr a el Career 044 K -.OE 4 2 6or.fen -oc 2¢ ., el. Car.«er
m
ESTIMATED HATCH SIZE - 10' X 10'
SEPTEMBER 2025 LA CIENEGA PARK -LE DDUX WELL PUMP - CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS 54 EXHIBIT B

SCHEDULE OF PAYMENT AND RATES
CITY shall compensate CONSULTANT for the satisfactory performance of the work described in this Agreement in a total amount not to exceed One Million Seven Hundred Twenty-Seven Thousand Six Hundred Fifty-Eight Dollars ($1,727,658.00), at the rates set forth in this Exhibit B and Attachment 1 to Exhibit B, including all labor taxes, and expenses.

In the event CITY requests Additional Services for services outside the scope set forth in Exhibit A, the fee shall be negotiated in advance and set forth in writing but shall not exceed Two Hundred Eight Thousand Four Hundred Fifty-Nine Dollars ($208,459.00).

In no event shall this Agreement total exceed One Million Nine Hundred Thirty-Six Thousand One Hundred Seventeen Dollars ($1,936,117.00).

CONSULTANT shall submit an itemized statement to CITY for its services performed, which shall include documentation setting forth in detail a description of the services rendered. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT the undisputed amount of such undisputed billing within thirty (30) days of receipt of same.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 55 ATTACHMENT 1 TO EXHIBIT B
Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E ree Lue to
Fee Increase Scope
Due to Rates Additions/
Task Adjustment Deletions Total Fee Notes
Task 1 - Preliminary Enaineerina Services
Task completed. Remaining budget is subtracted from

1.1-Kick-off Meeting $0 ($1,939) ($1,939) amendment
Task completed. Remaining budget is subtracted from

1.2-Data Colection, Review & Analysis $0 ($1,397 ($1,397) amendment Task completed. Remaining budget is subtracted from

1.3-Field Reconnaissance $0 ($2,171) ($2,171 amendment
Task completed. Remaining budget is subtracted from

1.4-Evaluate and Rank up to Six Sites $0 ($4,414) ($4,414) amendment Incorporate Le Doux Well concept and air qualty protection

1.5-Update Draft Basis of Desian Report $1.220 $8,970 $10,190 measures

1.6-Final Basis of Design Report $710 $0 $710 Updated rates Task 1 - Subtotal $0 $0 $980
Task 2- Permitting $0 ($33,093) ($33,093) Deleted
Task completed. Remaining budget is subtracted from
Task 3 - CEQA Compliance $0 ($28,025) ($28,025) amendment Task 4 - Site Investigations

4.1-T0po Survey $2,895 $8,085 $10,980 Updated rates and revised survey extent

4.2-Potholing with Traffic Control $270 $2.248 $2,518 Updated rates and revised pothole scope Atonal analyses tor Le Doux Well concept and update tor

14.3 - Geotechrical lnvestioation $180 $5.458 $5,638 2025 CBC

4.4-Landscapinq $0 ($50,078) ($50.078) Deleted

4.5-Utiity Research $990 $0 $990 Updated rates

4.6-Hydraulic Analysis $640 $0 $640 Updated rates
Task 4- Subtotal $2,350 ($31,662) ($29,312)
Task 5 - Final Design

5.1-General $1,600 $0 $1,600 Updated rates. Hydraulic profiles not provided.

One additional yard piping plan and two additional discharge pipe

5.2-Civil $12,320 $23.040 $35,360 plans/profiles
Add Le Doux Well building concept The new well bulding will include adjacent retaining walls, as well as walls and a roof that retain soil. The wall located on top of the roof wil be a curved retaining wal.

We will develop structural calculations and details to address the unique geometry and large openings in the roof and front wall A 30 analytical model will be used in the design of the building.

Design lads will include roof and wall dead bads, soil pressures (including seismic soil lads), surcharge and live lads, snow loads (noting that the updated code now results in minor snow loads even in California), as well as wind and seismic loads.

Our calculations will evaluate both in-plane and out-of-plane loading on the walls. We anticipate that a more sophisticated analytical model may be required to adequately design the foundations and walls to meet global stability requirements, including sliding, beaning, and overturning
We will coordinate the design of railings around the retaining walls. Equipment anchorage and gate/fence design and

5.3- Structural $26, 160 $114,715 $140,875 foundations are excluded from this scope. However, we will

5.4-Architectural $9, 260 $38,790 $48,050 Add Le Doux Wet building concept it4lGllf
"!!t!th!hf!Mclin+Mitt44" f.Mt4if
the well buildings will include mitigation measures for potential hydrogen sulfide and methane exposure consisting of continuous ventilation, ventilation monitoring and alarming, and combustible

5.5-Buliina Mechnical (HVACI $5.800 $20.290 $26.090 laas detection

5.6-Process Mechanical $6.440 $0 $6.440 Updated rates

5.7 • Electrical $8,605 $0 $8,605 Updated rates

5.8-Instrumentation $7,795 $7.600 $15,395 Additional monitoring and alarms for air quality ventilation

5.9-Specifications $8,230 $0 $8,230 Updated rates

5.10-Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OI $1,620 $5,880 $7,500 Additional effort for Le Doux well building Task 5 - Subtotal $87,830 $210,315 $298,145
Task 6- Bid Assistance

6.1-Pre Bid Meeting and Field Site Walk $340 $0 $340 Updated rates .2-Responces to technical questions from pros $1,090 $0 $1.090 Updated rates

16.3 - Preparation or up to three (3) Addenda $1,640 $0 $1,640 Updated rates 56 Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E ree Due to
Fee Increase Scope
Due to Rates Additions/
Task Adjustment Deletions Total Fee Notes
Task 6 - Subtotal $3,070 $0 $3,070
Task 7 - Engineering Services During Construction (ESDC)

7.1-Attend Pre-Construction Meetinq $400 $0 $400 Updated rates

7.3-Construction Suppot for Well Equipping, Buildings, & Pipelines [7.3.1- Site Visits (up to 16 biweekly visits) $2,720 $0 $2,720 Updated rates

17.3.2 - Periodic Meetinos with the Contractor (12 $1, 160 $0 $1, 160 Updated rates

7.3.3-Review Shop Drawins (KJ 60 @ 4 hrs + $6,340 $0 $6,340 Updated rates

7.3.4- Review Requests for Information (KJ 40 ( $6.630 $0 $6,630 Updated rates

7.3.5-Change Order Review(4 @10 hrs) $1,110 $0 $1,110 Updated rates [7.4-Record Drawings $2,380 $0 $2,380 Updated rates
Task 7- Subtotal $20,740 $0 $20,740
Task 8 - Community Outreach Support
I8.1-Public Outreach Support $0 ($24,138) ($24,138) Deleted Task 8 - Subtotal $0 ($24,138) ($24,138
Task 9 - Meetings and Monthly Reports

9.1-Biweekly (Virtual) Coordination Meetings $960 $8,240 $9,200 Provide for bi-weekly calls through March 2027.

9.3-Monthly Reports $1,410 $12,795 $14,205 Provide for monthly reports through August 2028 Task 9- Subtotal $2,370 $21,035 $23,405
Task 10 -Project Management and QA/QC

10.1 -Project Management $3,600 $32,530 $36,130 PM effort throuah August 2028.

10.2-Proiect Schedule $510 $4,695 $5,205 Schedule updates after each desian milestone.

10.3 -Quality Control (QA/QC) $1,800 $21,600 $23,400 Additional QC efforts for Le Doux well design.

Task 10 - Subtotal $5,910 $58,825 $64,735
EW5-NEPA Support $0 ($3,429) ($3,429
WORKPLAN SUBTOTAL $124, 200 $168,878 $293,078
Contingency $65,000
AMENDMENT TOTAL $0 $65,000 $358,078
57 Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E K/Kennedy Jenks
Client/Address: City of Beverly Hills
345 Foothill Road
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Contract/Proposal Date: January 26th, 2026
Custom Schedule of Charges

PERSONNEL COMPENSATION
Classification Hourly Rate
Engineer-Scientist-Specialist 1 $160
Engineer-Scientist-Specialist 2 $190
Engineer-Scientist-Specialist 3 $210
Engineer-Scientist-Specialist 4 $230
Engineer-Scientist-Specialist 5 $250
Engineer-Scientist-Specialist 6 $275
Engineer-Scientist-Specialist 7 $300
Engineer-Scientist-Specialist 8 $320
Engineer-Scientist-Specialist 9 $335
Senior CAD-Designer $195
CAD-Designer $180
Senior CAD-Technician $165
CAD-Technician $165
Project Assistant $145
Administrative Assistant $130
Direct Expenses
Reimbursement for direct expenses, as listed below, incurred in connection with the work, will be at cost plus five percent for items such as:
a. Maps, photographs, 3rd party reproductions, 3rd party printing, equipment rental, and special supplies related to the work.
b. Consultants, soils engineers, surveyors, contractors, and other outside services. c. Rented vehicles, local public transportation and taxis, travel and subsistence. d. Project specific telecommunications and delivery charges. e. Special fees, insurance, permits, and licenses applicable to the work. f. Outside computer processing, computation, and proprietary programs purchased for the work.

Reimbursement for vehicles used in connection with the work will be at the federally approved mileage rates or at a negotiated monthly rate.

If prevailing wage rates apply, the above billing rates will be adjusted as appropriate.

Overtime for non-exempt employees will be billed at one and a half times the Hourly Rates specified above.

Rates for professional staff for legal proceedings or as expert witnesses will be at rates one and one-half times the Hourly Rates specified above.

Excise and gross receipts taxes, if any, will be added as a direct expense.

The foregoing Schedule of Charges is incorporated into the agreement for the services provided, effective September 2025 through August 31, 2028. After this date, the Schedule of Charges is subject to change based on mutual agreement.
58 EXHIBIT D
Terms for Compliance with California Labor Law Requirements Section 1. CONSULTANT acknowledges that the project as defined in this Agreement between CONSULTANT and CITY, to which this Agreement to Comply with California Labor Law Requirements is attached and incorporated by reference, is a “public work” as defined in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code (“Chapter 1”), and that this Agreement is subject to (a) Chapter 1, including without limitation Labor Code Section 1771 and (b) the rules and regulations established by the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) implementing such statutes. CONSULTANT shall perform all work on the project as a public work. CONSULTANT shall comply with and be bound by all the terms, rules and regulations described in 1(a) and 1(b) as though set forth in full herein.

Section 2. California law requires the inclusion of specific Labor Code provisions in certain contracts. The inclusion of such specific provisions below, whether or not required by California law, does not alter the meaning or scope of Section 1 above.

Section 3. CONSULTANT shall be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations in accordance with California Labor Code Section 1725.5, and has provided proof of registration to CITY prior to the effective date of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall not perform work with any subconsultant that is not registered with DIR pursuant to Section 1725.5. CONSULTANT and subconsultants shall maintain their registration with the DIR in effect throughout the duration of this Agreement. If CONSULTANT or any subconsultant cease to be registered with DIR at any time during the duration of the project, CONSULTANT shall immediately notify CITY.

Section 4. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4, CONSULTANT’s services are subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by DIR. CONSULTANT shall post job site notices, as prescribed by DIR regulations.

Section 5. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to perform the Agreement are on file at City Hall and will be made available to any interested party on request. CONSULTANT acknowledges receipt of a copy of the DIR determination of such prevailing rate of per diem wages, and CONSULTANT shall post such rates at each job site covered by this Agreement.

Section 6. CONSULTANT shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1774 and 1775 concerning the payment of prevailing rates of wages to workers and the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages. CONSULTANT shall, as a penalty to the CITY, forfeit two hundred dollars ($200) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates as determined by the DIR for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done pursuant to this Agreement by CONSULTANT or by any subconsultant.

Section 7. CONSULTANT shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1776, which requires CONSULTANT and each subconsultant to (1) keep accurate payroll records and verify such records in writing under penalty of perjury, as specified in Section 1776, (2) certify and make such payroll records available for inspection as provided by Section 1776, and (3) inform the CITY of the location of the records.

Section 8. CONSULTANT shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 and California Administrative Code title 8, section 200 et Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E 59 seq. concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for compliance with these aforementioned Sections for all apprenticeable occupations. Prior to commencing work under this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide CITY with a copy of the information submitted to any applicable apprenticeship program. Within 60 days after concluding work pursuant to this Agreement, CONSULTANT and each of its subconsultants shall submit to the CITY a verified statement of the journeyman and apprentice hours performed under this Agreement.

Section 9. CONSULTANT acknowledges that eight hours labor constitutes a legal day’s work. CONSULTANT shall comply with and be bound by Labor Code Section 1810.

CONSULTANT shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess hours. CONSULTANT shall, as a penalty to the CITY, forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the performance of this Agreement by CONSULTANT or by any subconsultant for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than eight hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to Labor Code section 1815, work performed by employees of CONSULTANT in excess of eight hours per day, and 40 hours during any one week shall be permitted upon public work upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of eight hours per day at not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay.

Section 10. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700 provide that every employer will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1861, CONSULTANT hereby certifies as follows:
“I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.”
Section 11. For every subconsultant who will perform work on the project, CONSULTANT shall be responsible for such subconsultant’s compliance with Chapter 1 and Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700, and CONSULTANT shall include in the written contract between it and each subconsultant a copy of those statutory provisions and a requirement that each subconsultant shall comply with those statutory provisions. CONSULTANT shall be required to take all actions necessary to enforce such contractual provisions and ensure subconsultant’s compliance, including without limitation, conducting a periodic review of the certified payroll records of the subconsultant and upon becoming aware of the failure of the subconsultant to pay his or her workers the specified prevailing rate of wages. CONSULTANT shall diligently take corrective action to halt or rectify any failure.

Section 12. To the maximum extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend (at CONSULTANT’s expense with counsel reasonably acceptable to the CITY) the CITY, its officials, officers, employees, agents and independent contractors serving in the role of CITY officials, and volunteers from and against any demand or claim for damages, compensation, fines, penalties or other amounts arising out of or incidental to any acts or omissions listed above by any person or entity (including CONSULTANT, its subconsultants, and each of their officials, officers, employees and agents) in connection with any work undertaken or in connection with the Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages, attorneys’ fees, and other related costs and expenses. All duties of CONSULTANT under this Section shall survive termination of the Agreement.

Docusign Envelope ID: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E Certificate Of Completion
Envelope Id: 9D556816-099A-4A15-9ED7-8728FB57667E Status: Sent Subject: Complete with Docusign: Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc. (752-22) Amendment No. 1 Source Envelope:

Document Pages: 59 Signatures: 7 Envelope Originator:

Certificate Pages: 3 Initials: 0 Erin Justus
AutoNav: Enabled
EnvelopeId Stamping: Enabled
Time Zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)
455 N. Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
[email protected]
IP Address: 198.245.189.177
Record Tracking
Status: Original
2/12/2026 5:03:28 PM
Holder: Erin Justus
[email protected]
Location: DocuSign
Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Gerard P. Cavaluzzi
[email protected]
Vice President & Corporate Secretary
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None) Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 2a04:4e41:6401:2fcb::db61:afcb
Signed using mobile
Sent: 2/12/2026 5:21:20 PM
Viewed: 2/12/2026 7:52:17 PM
Signed: 2/12/2026 7:53:12 PM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:

Not Offered via Docusign
Jeff Savard
[email protected]
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 172.89.24.187
Sent: 2/12/2026 5:21:20 PM
Viewed: 2/12/2026 6:40:32 PM
Signed: 2/13/2026 7:40:38 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:

Not Offered via Docusign
Deborah R. Hakman for
[email protected]
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 2a04:4e41:2801:dc24::2e2f:cc24
Signed using mobile
Sent: 2/13/2026 7:40:41 AM
Viewed: 2/13/2026 9:52:44 AM
Signed: 2/13/2026 9:54:03 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:

Not Offered via Docusign
Anthony Rodstein
[email protected]
Purchasing Services Manager
City of Beverly Hills (Finance Department)
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 198.245.189.181
Sent: 2/13/2026 9:54:06 AM
Resent: 2/17/2026 7:35:29 AM
Resent: 2/18/2026 7:31:05 AM
Viewed: 2/18/2026 9:53:31 AM
Signed: 2/18/2026 9:53:49 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:

Not Offered via Docusign
? docusign
Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Sharon L'Heureux Dressel
[email protected]
Risk Manager
Sharon Dressel
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 198.245.189.166
Sent: 2/18/2026 9:53:52 AM
Viewed: 2/18/2026 10:16:19 AM
Signed: 2/18/2026 10:16:26 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:

Not Offered via Docusign
Daren Grilley
[email protected]
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 198.245.189.177
Sent: 2/18/2026 10:16:31 AM
Viewed: 2/18/2026 11:06:22 AM
Signed: 2/18/2026 11:06:29 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:

Not Offered via Docusign
Shana E. Epstein
[email protected]
Director of Public Works
City of Beverly Hills
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 198.245.189.177
Sent: 2/18/2026 11:06:31 AM
Viewed: 2/18/2026 11:50:01 AM
Signed: 2/18/2026 11:50:49 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:

Not Offered via Docusign
Anthony Rodstein
[email protected]
Purchasing Services Manager
City of Beverly Hills (Finance Department)
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Sent: 2/18/2026 11:50:55 AM
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:

Not Offered via Docusign
Nancy Hunt-Coffey
[email protected]
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:

Not Offered via Docusign
Sharona R. Nazarian
[email protected]
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:

Not Offered via Docusign
Huma Ahmed
[email protected]
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:

Not Offered via Docusign
In Person Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Editor Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Agent Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Intermediary Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Certified Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Carbon Copy Events Status Timestamp
Denise Garcia
[email protected]
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:

Not Offered via Docusign
Keith Sterling
[email protected]
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:

Not Offered via Docusign
Jackie Galeas
[email protected]
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:

Not Offered via Docusign
Witness Events Signature Timestamp
Notary Events Signature Timestamp
Envelope Summary Events Status Timestamps
Envelope Sent Hashed/Encrypted 2/12/2026 5:21:20 PM
Payment Events Status Timestamps