Cities Index.
Agenda, closed session

Beverly Hills City Council
June 9, 2026

Document
Agenda, closed session
Meeting
June 9, 2026
Body
Beverly Hills City Council
Original file
154 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on beverlyhills.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

1 * Time is approximate. Closed Session shall begin upon conclusion of the Study Session.

B0785-0001\3256415v1.doc

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS
City Hall
City Council Chamber and Room 280B
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Public Comment Participation:

In-person in City Council Chamber
or by calling (310) 288-2288
or by email at [email protected]

CLOSED SESSION AGENDA
June 9, 2026
2:30 p.m.

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
Government Code Section 54956.8

1. Property: 331 Foothill Road
City Negotiator: Nancy Hunt-Coffey, City Manager
Negotiating Party: United Talent Agency
Under negotiation:

Price
Terms of Payment
x Both
The City, as Lessor, is considering the terms of a proposed lease amendment.

2. Property: 401 South Robertson Boulevard
City Negotiator: Nancy Hunt-Coffey, City Manager
Negotiating Party: GRL Partnership
Under negotiation:

Price
Terms of Payment
x Both
The City is considering whether to purchase the property. 2 B0785-0001\3256415v1.doc

3. Property: 419 South Robertson Boulevard
City Negotiator: Nancy Hunt-Coffey, City Manager
Negotiating Party: Page Academy
Under negotiation:

Price
Terms of Payment
x Both
The City is considering whether to purchase the property.

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL
The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the local agency in the litigation.

Potential Initiation of Litigation
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)
Number of Cases: 1
Anticipation of Litigation
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(e)(1), which states:
(1) Facts and circumstances that might result in litigation against the local agency but which the local agency believes are not yet known to a potential plaintiff or plaintiffs, which facts and circumstances need not be disclosed.

Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) and (d)(3):

Number of Cases: 1

1. The City has received a claim for damages from an employee. Documentation of the claim is available in the City Clerk’s office.

Existing Litigation
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
Name of Case:

1. Elham Eliahou Sefaradi v. City of Beverly Hills, et al.; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 24SMCV02347
This litigation concerns a trip and fall accident on a City sidewalk. 3 B0785-0001\3256415v1.doc

2. Ian Greene, et al. v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., United States District Court Case No. 24-cv-05916-MRA-AS
This litigation concerns an allegation of racial profiling by the Beverly Hills Police Department.

3. Jasmine Williams, et al. v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., United States District Court Case No. 2:21-cv-08698-FMO-RAO
This litigation concerns an allegation of racial profiling by the Beverly Hills Police Department.

4. City of Beverly Hills v. 93 Eighty LP, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23SMCV04546
This litigation concerns prosecution of unlawful short term rentals.

5. 8800 Wilshire Associates, LP v. City of Beverly Hills, et al.; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25 STCP01129
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for this property was lost due to a change to the square footage.

6. 8820 Wilshire Associates, LP v. City of Beverly Hills, et al.; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. STCP01131
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for this property was lost due to a change to the square footage.

7. California Housing Defense Fund, et al., v. City of Beverly Hills; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25STCP01665
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for the property at 8800 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills was lost due to a change to the square footage.

8. California Housing Defense Fund, et al., v. City of Beverly Hills; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25STCP00260
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for the property at 8820 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills was lost due to a change to the square footage.

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Government Code Section 54957.6
CITY NEGOTIATOR: Craig A. Corman, Mayor
Unrepresented Employee: City Manager
4 B0785-0001\3256415v1.doc
CITY NEGOTIATOR: Craig A. Corman, Mayor
Unrepresented Employee: City Clerk
CITY NEGOTIATOR: Craig A. Corman, Mayor
Unrepresented Employee: City Attorney

PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Government Code Section 54957
Title: City Manager
City Clerk
City Attorney

← All documents from this meeting