1 * Time is approximate. Closed Session shall begin upon conclusion of the Study Session.
B0785-0001\3271491v1.doc
CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS
City Hall
City Council Chamber and Room 280B
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Public Comment Participation:
In-person in City Council Chamber
or by calling (310) 288-2288
or by email at [email protected]
CLOSED SESSION AGENDA
July 21, 2026
2:30 p.m.
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
Government Code Section 54956.8
1. Property: 401 South Robertson Boulevard
City Negotiator: Ryan Gohlich, City Manager
Negotiating Party: GRL Partnership
Under negotiation:
Price
Terms of Payment
x Both
The City is considering whether to purchase the property.
2. Property: 419 South Robertson Boulevard
City Negotiator: Ryan Gohlich, City Manager
Negotiating Party: Page Academy
Under negotiation:
Price
Terms of Payment
x Both
The City is considering whether to purchase the property. 2 B0785-0001\3271491v1.doc
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL
The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the local agency in the litigation.
Anticipation of Litigation
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) and (d)(3):
Number of Cases: 2
1. The City has received a claim for damages from an employee. Documentation of the claim is available in the City Clerk’s office.
2. The City has received a claim for vehicle damage resulting from a water main break.
Documentation of the claim is available in the City Clerk’s office.
Existing Litigation
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
Name of Case:
1. Daryl Glover v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV04166
This litigation concerns an allegation of discrimination, harassment and retaliation by a former employee.
2. 8800 Wilshire Associates, LP v. City of Beverly Hills, et al.; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25 STCP01129
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for this property was lost due to a change to the square footage.
3. 8820 Wilshire Associates, LP v. City of Beverly Hills, et al.; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. STCP01131
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for this property was lost due to a change to the square footage. 3 B0785-0001\3271491v1.doc
4. California Housing Defense Fund, et al., v. City of Beverly Hills; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25STCP01665
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for the property at 8800 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills was lost due to a change to the square footage.
5. California Housing Defense Fund, et al., v. City of Beverly Hills; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25STCP00260
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for the property at 8820 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills was lost due to a change to the square footage.
6. Michael Yamada v. City of Beverly Hills, WCAB Case Nos. ADJ19627788, ADJ18723873
This litigation concerns a Workers’ Compensation claim.
7. Sagi Sahar v. City of Beverly Hills; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25SMCV00410
This litigation concerns an automobile accident with a City police vehicle.
8. Flats Management Group, LLC, et al. v. LACMTA, et al.; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC691935
This litigation concerns alleged damages to a property caused by construction of the Metro Purple Line Extension.