1 * Time is approximate. Closed Session shall begin upon conclusion of the Study Session.
B0785-0001\3297898v1.doc
CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS
City Hall
City Council Chamber and Room 280B
455 North Rexford Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Public Comment Participation:
In-person in City Council Chamber
or by calling (310) 288-2288
or by email at [email protected]
CLOSED SESSION AGENDA
September 22, 2026
2:30 p.m.
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
Government Code Section 54956.8
1. Property: 331 Foothill Road, Suite 400
City Negotiator: Ryan Gohlich, City Manager
Negotiating Party: George LLP
Live Nation Entertainment
United Talent Agency, LLC
Under negotiation:
Price
Terms of Payment
x Both
The City, as Lessor, is considering the terms of proposed leases.
2. Property: 416-418 North Maple Drive
City Negotiator: Ryan Gohlich, City Manager
Negotiating Party: Domus Development, LLC
Maple Apartments 416 LLC
Maple Apartments 418 LLC
2 B0785-0001\3297898v1.doc
Under negotiation:
Price
Terms of Payment
x Both
The City is considering whether to purchase the property.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL
The City Council finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the local agency in the litigation.
Anticipation of Litigation
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) and (d)(3):
Number of Cases: 1
1. The City has received a property damage claim resulting from a City sanitation vehicle accident. Documentation of the claim is available in the City Clerk’s office.
Existing Litigation
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
Name of Case:
1. Guiragos Gagossian v. City of Beverly Hills, et al.; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV33732
This litigation concerns a trip and fall accident involving a tree well on a City sidewalk.
2. 8800 Wilshire Associates, LP v. City of Beverly Hills, et al.; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25 STCP01129
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for this property was lost due to a change to the square footage.
3. 8820 Wilshire Associates, LP v. City of Beverly Hills, et al.; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. STCP01131
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for this property was lost due to a change to the square footage. 3 B0785-0001\3297898v1.doc
4. California Housing Defense Fund, et al., v. City of Beverly Hills; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25STCP01665
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for the property at 8800 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills was lost due to a change to the square footage.
5. California Housing Defense Fund, et al., v. City of Beverly Hills; Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25STCP00260
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s determination that the Builder’s Remedy development application for the property at 8820 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills was lost due to a change to the square footage.
6. Ian Greene, et al. v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., United States District Court Case No. 24-cv-05916-MRA-AS
This litigation concerns an allegation of racial profiling by the Beverly Hills Police Department.
7. Daryl Glover v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV04166
This litigation concerns an allegation of discrimination, harassment and retaliation by a former employee.
8. Visente Lemus v. City of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25SMCV01790
This litigation concerns a trip and fall accident involving a water meter cap on a City street.
9. Beverly Hills Vacation Rental Alliance v. City of Beverly Hills, United States District Court Case No. 2:26-cv-09699-CAS-(AYPx)
This litigation concerns a challenge to the City’s short-term rental ordinance.
10. Matthew Barbani v. City of Beverly Hills, WCAB Case Nos. ADJ19684617; ADJ19794185; ADJ11063063
This litigation concerns a Workers’ Compensation claim.
11. James Keenaghan v. City of Beverly Hills, WCAB Case Nos. ADJ17347950, ADJ17347599
This litigation concerns a Workers’ Compensation claim. 4 B0785-0001\3297898v1.doc
12. Ayala Annette Naor v. City of Beverly Hills, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 25SMCV00642
This litigation concerns an automobile v. pedestrian accident involving a vehicle operated by a City employee.
CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Government Code Section 54957.6
CITY NEGOTIATOR: Peter J. Brown, Special Counsel
Employee Organization: Management and Professional Employees Association The most recent Memorandum of Understanding with the Management and Professional Employees Association was adopted October 7, 2023
CITY NEGOTIATOR: Peter J. Brown, Special Counsel
Employee Organization: Supervisors Association
The most recent Memorandum of Understanding with the Supervisors Association was adopted October 7, 2023
CITY NEGOTIATOR: Peter J. Brown, Special Counsel
Employee Organization: Confidential Employees Association The most recent Memorandum of Understanding with the Confidential Employees Association was adopted October 7, 2023
CITY NEGOTIATOR: Peter J. Brown, Special Counsel
Employee Organization: Safety Support Association
The most recent Memorandum of Understanding with the Safety Support Association was adopted October 7, 2023
CITY NEGOTIATOR: Peter J. Brown, Special Counsel
Employee Organization: Municipal Employees’ Association The most recent Memorandum of Understanding with the Municipal Employees’ Association was adopted October 7, 2023
CITY NEGOTIATOR: Peter J. Brown, Special Counsel
Employee Organization: Municipal Employees’ Association (Part-Time Unit) The most recent Memorandum of Understanding with the Municipal Employees’ Association (Part-Time Unit) was adopted October 7, 2023