Agenda packet — Bishop City Council, August 25, 2025

CITY OF BISHOP

CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
City Council Chambers - 301 West Line Street - Bishop, California MONDAY, AUGUST 25, 2025 - 6:00 PM

1. CALL TO ORDER - 6:00 p.m. Monday, August 25, 2025

2. MOMENT OF SILENCE
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: Please be advised this meeting is accessible to the public in person, on the City of Bishop website, or on the local government cable channel 12. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at 760-873-5863 Extension 124. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. [28 CFR

35.102.35.104 ADA Title II].

The public is encouraged to participate or observe this meeting by:

1. Attending this meeting in person at the City of Bishop City Council Chambers located at 301 West Line Street in Bishop, California.

2. Observing this meeting live from the City of Bishop website at:
https://www.cityofbishop.com/government/city_council/index.php

3. Observe this meeting live from the local government cable channel 12.

Public comments may be made:

1. In person: Members of the public desiring to speak on a matter appearing on the agenda should ask the Mayor for the opportunity to be heard when the item comes up for Council consideration (or complete a speaker card prior to the meeting). Comments for all agenda items are limited to a speaking time of three minutes unless modified by the Mayor.

2. In writing: Go to http://bishop-ca.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=8 to submit an "eComment" for the corresponding meeting. Please note that eComment submissions closes at 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. You may also hand deliver public comments to the City drop/payment box located at the Church Street entrance to City Hall on or before the deadline noted above. All written public comments received prior to the above noted time will be distributed to the Council for their review and consideration prior to the meeting. All written public comments received after that time will be provided to the Council at the earliest possibility. Please note written public comments received will not be read aloud at the meeting.

Any writing that is a public record that relates to an agenda item for open session distributed less than 72 hours prior to the meeting will be available for public inspection at City Hall, 377 West Line Street, Bishop, California during normal business hours.

Government Code 54957.5(b)(1). Copies will also be provided at the appropriate meeting.
1 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Mayor Pro Tem Muchovej will lead the pledge of allegiance.

4. ROLL CALL

5. PUBLIC COMMENT

6. DEPARTMENT REPORTS

7. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. City Council Meeting Minutes
B. Consider Approval of Updated Agreement with Rojas Public Affairs C. Full-Time Salary Schedule - July 1, 2025 - June 30, 2026 D. Personnel Status Change Report - October 28, 2024

8. NEW BUSINESS
A. Planning Commission Appointment Recommendations
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: This time is set aside to receive public comment on matters not calendared on the agenda. When recognized by the Mayor, please state your name and address for the record and please limit your comments to three minutes. Under California law the City Council is prohibited from generally discussing or taking action on items not included in the agenda; however, the City Council will listen to all public comment but will not generally discuss the matter or take action on it.

Updates on department activities will be given by the Department Heads and/or their staff.

A. Fire Department - Fire Chief Bret Russell
B. Police Department - Police Chief Nate Derr
C. Public Works Department - Public Works Director Nora Gamino D. Community Services Department - Community Services Manager Dan McElroy E. Planning Department - Principal Planner Ana Budnyk
F. Administration - City Administrator Deston Dishion
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: All matters under the Consent Calendar are considered routine by the City and will be acted on by one motion.

Recommended Action: Council consideration to approve the City Council Special Meeting Minutes for July 14, 2025 and the City Council Meeting Minutes for July 28, 2025.

Minutes 2025 07 14 - Special Meeting
Minutes 2025 07 28
Recommended Action: Council to consider approval of the updated agreement with Rojas Public Affairs at a monthly fee of $2,500.

UPDATED_BIshop_RPA State Advocacy Proposal 2025_2026
Recommended Action: Council consideration to approve the Salary Schedules for 2025/2026 fiscal year.
2025-2026 Full Time Salary Schedule
Recommended Action: Council to review and approve the attached Personnel Status Change Report dated October 28, 2024.

PERSONNEL STATUS CHANGE REPORT.8.25.25
2 B. LS-1 Option E Streetlight Conversion Agreement with Southern California Edison
C. Introduction to Water and Sewer Rate Study and Capital Improvement Plans

9. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

10. COUNCIL AND COMMITTEE REPORTS

11. ADJOURNMENT
Recommended Action:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Reappoint Patricia Lew to a new four-year term ending August 25, 2029 on the Planning Commission.

2. Appoint Casey Stroud to a four-year term ending August 25, 2029 on the Planning Commission.

Recommended Action: Council consideration to authorize the City Administrator to execute the Schedule LS-1 Option E Energy Efficiency LED Fixture Replacement Rate Agreement with Southern California Edison (SCE) to convert SCE-owned highpressure sodium vapor (HPSV) streetlights in the City of Bishop to LED fixtures, and to select [2700K or 3000K] as the City’s preferred light color temperature. 1 AB719 LS-1 Option E Agreement_Redacted
LS-1 Lights Map
LS-1 Option E Closure Deck
Recommended Action: City Council consideration of the draft Water and Sewer Capital Improvement Plans (CIP) and related financial planning information. Staff is seeking direction regarding the preferred approach to funding and rate setting.

Introduction to Water and Sewer Rate Study and Capital Improvement Plans Presentation
Monday, September 8, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. Regular Meeting in the City Council Chambers 3 CITY OF BISHOP

CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
JULY 14, 2025
1) CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Kong called the special meeting of the Bishop City Council to order at 8:31 a.m. in the City Council Chambers, 301 West Line Street, Bishop, California. 2) ROLL CALL
PRESENT:

Councilmember Freundt
Councilmember Garcia
Councilmember Schwartz
Mayor Pro Tem Muchovej
Mayor Kong
ABSENT:

None.

OTHERS PRESENT: Deston Dishion, City Administrator; Robin Picken, City Clerk; Dean J. Pucci, City Attorney; Ethan Aukee, Finance Director; Bret Russell, Fire Chief; Nate Derr, Police Chief; and Nora Gamino, Public Works Director 3) PUBLIC COMMENT FOR SPECIAL MEETINGS
No public comments were made.
4) CLOSED SESSION

4.A) PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT pursuant to Government Code § 54957 - Title: City Administrator
Closed Session began at 8:33 a.m. Closed Session ended at 1:22 p.m. 5) OPEN SESSION
Mayor Kong called the open session of the Bishop City Council to order at 1:23 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 301 West Line Street, Bishop, California. 6) REPORT ON ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION AS REQUIRED BY LAW
To report on actions taken in Closed Session as required by law, City Attorney Pucci announced that no reportable action was taken.
7) ADJOURNMENT
July 14, 2025 - Special Meeting Page 1
4 The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 1:23 p.m. to the City Council Meeting scheduled for Monday, July 28, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. ______________________________________
Karen Kong, Mayor
Attest: ______________________________
Robin Picken, City Clerk
July 14, 2025 - Special Meeting Page 2
5 CITY OF BISHOP

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JULY 28, 2025
1) CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Kong called the meeting of the Bishop City Council to order at 5:02 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 301 West Line Street, Bishop, California. 2) ROLL CALL
PRESENT:

Councilmember Freundt
Councilmember Garcia
Councilmember Schwartz
Mayor Pro Tem Muchovej
Mayor Kong
ABSENT:

None.

OTHERS PRESENT: Deston Dishion, City Administrator; Robin Picken, City Clerk; Dean J. Pucci, City Attorney; Bret Russell, Fire Chief; and Nate Derr, Police Chief 3) PUBLIC COMMENT PRIOR TO CLOSED SESSION
No public comments were made.
4) CLOSED SESSION
Closed Session began at 5:04 p.m. Closed Session ended at 6:15 p.m.

4.A) PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION pursuant to Government Code § 54957 – Title: Fire Chief

4.B) PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION pursuant to Government Code § 54957 – Title: Police Chief
5) OPEN SESSION
Mayor Kong called the open session of the Bishop City Council to order at 6:17 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 301 West Line Street, Bishop, California. 6) MOMENT OF SILENCE
Mayor Kong announced a moment of silence.
7) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Garcia.

July 28, 2025 Page 1
6 8) ROLL CALL
PRESENT:

Councilmember Freundt
Councilmember Garcia
Councilmember Schwartz
Mayor Pro Tem Muchovej
Mayor Kong
ABSENT:

None.

OTHERS PRESENT: Deston Dishion, City Administrator; Robin Picken, City Clerk; Dean J. Pucci, City Attorney; Bret Russell, Fire Chief; Nate Derr, Police Chief; Nora Gamino, Public Works Director; and Dan McElroy, Community Services Manager 9) PUBLIC COMMENT
Public comments were made by:

Pastor Tim Homan of the Eastern Sierra Pastoral Association recited a prayer.

Sheryl Kane, a local resident, spoke as an advocate for the grey and red wolf population.

Tyler Beadle, a Bishop resident, expressed his concerns about the Council's secret decisions without public input as it relates to the A-Frame eviction, the exclusion of two Planning Commissioners who reside outside the City limits, and welcomed the newly appointed City Administrator.

Jessica Tex, spoke in support of the Visitor Center, and asked the Council to maintain the Visitor Center A-frame.

Carl Hoelscher, a local resident, spoke in support of keeping the Chamber A-frame.

Doug Talmage, a local resident, spoke in support of keeping the Chamber A-frame.

Noel Gabriel-Guacheno, a local resident, spoke in support of keeping the Chamber Aframe.

Jennifer Beaudean, requested that the Council place the topic of the Chamber of Commerce and the A-frame building on a future meeting agenda so it can be discussed. Jennifer Beaudean also requested that Council address the large cracks on Wye Road and the removal of barricades along Highway 6 on a future Council meeting agenda.

Gayla Wolf, a local resident, spoke in support of saving the Chamber A-frame building and asked that this topic be placed on a future Council meeting agenda to discuss.

Warren Allsup, a local resident, spoke in support of keeping the Chamber A-frame.

Jerry Core, a local resident, spoke in support of saving the Chamber A-frame.

July 28, 2025 Page 2
7 Cari Arnal, a local resident, spoke in support of keeping the Chamber A-frame.

Leslie Sasuga, a local resident, spoke on behalf of Teri Allsup and herself in support of the Bishop Chamber of Commerce and the preservation of the A-frame building.

Joann Lijek, a local resident, spoke in support of keeping the A-frame building and the Chamber of Commerce and Visitor Center at their current location, and spoke against the barricades placed along Highway 6.

Aaron Schat, a local resident and business owner, thanked the Chamber of Commerce for their hard work, spoke in support of keeping the Chamber A-frame building where it is, and offered to donate funds to help make repairs. Aaron Schat also asked that Council place the A-frame building on a future City Council agenda for discussion.

Lynette McIntosh, a local resident, spoke in support of saving the Chamber A-frame building, and asked Council to find a better way of informing the public.

John F. Harris, a Bishop resident, spoke in favor of keeping the Chamber of Commerce in the A-frame building where they currently are.

Frank Carr Jr., a Bishop resident, spoke in favor of keeping the two memorials currently located in front of the Chamber of Commerce and Visitor Center where they are, front and center, not in the back of the lot.

No further public comments were made. Mayor Pro Tem Muchovej spoke briefly regarding the Council's on-going support for the Chamber and hopes that Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Tawni Thomson will acknowledge the same. Mayor Pro Tem Muchovej commented further on the A-frame building's condition and inspection. Mayor Kong thanked everyone for attending and acknowledged that they have been heard.
10) REPORT ON ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION AS REQUIRED BY LAW
To report on actions taken in Closed Session as required by law, Mayor Kong announced that there is no reportable action.
11) PRESENTATIONS

11.A) PRESENTATION - Bishop Mule Days Report - Prepared and presented by Bishop Mule Days Celebration Executive Director Donna Bird. 2025 Bishop Mule Days Post Event Report - July 28, 2025 Bishop Mule Days Celebration Executive Director Donna Bird reviewed the 2025 Bishop Mule Days Post Event Report with Council.

After answering all of Council's questions, Council thanked Donna Bird for her report and for all of her work in continuing to bring Mule Days to Bishop. 12) DEPARTMENT REPORTS
July 28, 2025 Page 3
8 Written reports from the Fire, Police, Public Works, Community Services, Planning, and Administration Departments were submitted on each department's activities including upcoming and ongoing projects. Verbal reports were also given by the Fire, Police, Public Works, Community Services, and Administration Departments.

12.A) Fire Department Report - Fire Chief Bret Russell
Fire Department Report - June 2025

12.B) Police Department Report - Police Chief Nate Derr Police Department Report - June 2025

12.C) Public Works Department Report - Public Works Director Nora Gamino Public Works Department Report - June 2025

12.D) Community Services Department Report - Community Services Manager Daniel McElroy
Community Services Department Report - June 2025

12.E) Planning Department - Principal Planner Ana Budnyk Planning Department Report-June 2025

12.F) City Administrator Report - City Administrator Deston Dishion City Administrator Report - June 2025
13) BISHOP AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & INFORMATION CENTER UPDATE

13.A) Bishop Area Chamber of Commerce and Information Center Update Report - July 28, 2025
BACCIC July 28 2025 City Council Report
Bishop Area Chamber of Commerce and Information Center Executive Director Tawni Thomson reviewed her report submitted to Council. Council thanked Tawni Thomson for her report.
14) EASTERN SIERRA TRI-COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS QUARTERLY UPDATE REPORT
Interim Fairgrounds Manager Mike Francesconi reported on the Eastern Sierra TriCounty Fairgrounds activities, finances, and events to Council. Council thanked Mike Francesconi for his report.
15) CONSENT CALENDAR

15.A) June 2025 Budget Report
June 2025 Budget Report
July 28, 2025 Page 4
9 15.B) June 2025 Financial Reports
June 2025 Bank Reconciliation Report
June 2025 Combined Cash Report
June 2025 Investment Portfolio Report
June 2025 Warrant Register Report

15.C) Authorization to Establish an Investment Account with J.P. Morgan Chase for the Purpose of Investing in U.S. Treasury Obligations Cover Page
1-3 Year Treasury Ladder Fact Sheet
Customized Bond Portfolios Pitchbook

15.D) Sales Tax on Flock Camera System
Cover Page

15.E) Proposed Guidelines for the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Grant in Support Program
Cover Page
Grant in Support Information Packet FY 2025-2026

15.F) City Council Meeting Minutes
Minutes 2025 06 09
Minutes 2025 06 23
Minutes 2025 06 30 - Special Meeting

15.G) Full-Time Salary Schedule - July 1, 2025 - June 30, 2026 2025-2026 Full-Time Salary Schedule

15.H) ORDINANCE - Second Reading and Adoption of an Ordinance Relating to Density Bonus
Cover Page
Ordinance - Chapter 17.14 Density Bonus 2025 06 23
Handout - GC 65915-65918

15.I) 2025 Destruction Derby Agreement with the Tri-County Fairgrounds July 28, 2025 Page 5
10 Motion/Councilmember Schwartz Seconded/Mayor Pro Tem Muchovej Motion/Councilmember Garcia Seconded/Councilmember Schwartz Cover Page
Bishop Fire Department Destruction Derby Agreement 2025

15.J) Parks and Recreation Commission Meetings
Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting Cancellation Notice - June 25, 2025
Parks and Recreation Commission Special Meeting Agenda - June 25, 2025 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting Cancellation Notice - July 23, 2025

15.K) Planning Commission Meetings
Planning Commission Meeting Cancellation Notice - June 24, 2025 Planning Commission Meeting Cancellation Notice - July 29, 2025 No public comments were made.

Councilmember Schwartz made a motion to approve the Consent Calendar.

Motion passed 5-0
Ayes: Councilmember Freundt, Councilmember Garcia, Councilmember Schwartz, Mayor Pro Tem Muchovej, Mayor Kong
Noes: None
Abstain: None

Absent: None
16) NEW BUSINESS

16.A) Council Consideration of City Administrator Appointment and Employment Agreement with Pamela Foster
Cover Page
Proposed City Administrator Employment Agreement
Public Comments
City Attorney Dean Pucci reviewed this item with Council. No public comments were made.

The Mayor introduced Pamela Foster, who was present at the meeting. Pamela Foster thanked the Council for the opportunity, and expressed her excitement to help provide benefits to the community; and to work with the City Council.

Councilmember Garcia made a motion to approve the appointment of Pamela Foster as City Administrator and authorize Mayor Kong to execute the proposed City Administrator Employment Agreement.

Motion passed 5-0
July 28, 2025 Page 6
11 Motion/Councilmember Garcia Seconded/Councilmember Schwartz Ayes: Councilmember Freundt, Councilmember Garcia, Councilmember Schwartz, Mayor Pro Tem Muchovej, Mayor Kong
Noes: None
Abstain: None

Absent: None

16.B) ORDINANCE - First Reading and Introduction of an Ordinance Adding Chapter 6-4, Article 5 to the Bishop Municipal Code Regulating Electric Mobility Devices
Cover Page
E Mobility Device Ordinance
Police Chief Derr reviewed this item with Council.

Council deliberated this item and asked staff to provide clarification on definitions and to be consistent in the layout of the proposed ordinance.

Public comments were made by:

Dustin Delgiudice, a local business owner, asked Council to also consider how municipalities plan to deal with electric mobility devices for rent.

Sheryl Kane, a local resident, spoke to the dangers of being hit by an electric mobility device.

Doug Talmage, a local resident, spoke to his concern about night time visibility of electric mobility devices.

No further public comments were made.

Councilmember Garcia made a motion to approve the first reading and introduction of the proposed ordinance relating to regulating electric mobility devices by title only with Council's requested changes.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BISHOP, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10, VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC, OF THE BISHOP MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD CHAPTER 10.53 REGULATING ELECTRIC MOBILITY

DEVICES
Motion passed 5-0
Ayes: Councilmember Freundt, Councilmember Garcia, Councilmember Schwartz, Mayor Pro Tem Muchovej, Mayor Kong
Noes: None
Abstain: None

Absent: None

16.C) Annual League of California Cities/Cal Cities Conference - Attendance and Confirmation of Voting Delegate and Alternate(s)
Cover Page
2025 Voting Delegate and General Assembly Meeting Information July 28, 2025 Page 7
12 City Clerk Picken reviewed this item with Council. No public comments were made.

The Council discussed this item and directed staff to confirm that only the December 9, 2024 appointed voting delegates, Councilmember Garcia - Voting Delegate and Mayor Kong - Alternate Voting Delegate, will be attending the 2025 Annual League of California Cities Conference and to make the appropriate registrations and travel arrangements.

16.D) Discussion for Possible Contract with the Bishop Rural Fire Protection District to Provide Fire Services in the District.

Cover Page
Bishop Rural and City of Bishop JPA
City Administrator Dishion reviewed this item with Council.

City Administrator Dishion invited Bishop Rural Fire Protection District Board of Commissioners Chair Mike Holland to speak on this topic. Mike Holland gave an overview of the District's past history to where we are today.

No public comments were made.

Council deliberated this item and directed staff to review the current agreement, and arrange a joint meeting between the City Council and the Bishop Rural Fire Protection District Board of Commissioners in order to come to up with suggestions and solutions on how to manage the Fire Department and to bring the agreed upon solutions to the appropriate representatives on the Inyo County Board of Supervisors. 17) FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Mayor Pro Tem Muchovej, with consensus from Council, asked for an inventory of the City's properties and buildings in their current state at a future meeting. No further requests were made for future agendas items.
18) COUNCIL AND COMMITTEE REPORTS
Council Members reported on meetings and community events that they attended. 19) ADJOURNMENT
The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 9:23 p.m. to the City Council Meeting scheduled for Monday, August 11, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. Regular Meeting in the City Council Chambers.
______________________________________
Karen Kong, Mayor
Attest: ______________________________
Robin Picken, City Clerk
July 28, 2025 Page 8
13 Agenda Item: 7.B
Date of Meeting: August 25, 2025
Department: Administration
To: City Council
From: Deston Dishion
Subject: Consider Approval of Updated Agreement with Rojas Public Affairs Prepared On: August 13, 2025
Attachments: UPDATED_BIshop_RPA State Advocacy Proposal 2025_2026

STAFF REPORT
Background/History:

For nearly 2 years the City of Bishop has utilized the services of Rojas Public Affairs. The relationship has proven to be a great investment for the City. Rojas Public Affairs has been successful in gaining the City an Earmark for a new Fire Ladder Truck. Rojas has also been able to get the City into meetings with the City of Los Angeles Attorney's office, The State Fire Marshall's office and various other State entities. When the City first entered into this agreement with Rojas the cost was $4,000 per month. That cost also included the services of Jayson Braude who lives in Washington DC. About 6 months ago Jayson and Rojas parted ways. Since their separation, the City has been contracting with both firms separately for a $2,000 fee each or a total of $4,000.

Analysis/Discussion:

Last week Rojas Public Affairs sent a new proposal to cover the upcoming year starting September 2025. The updated proposal has increased to $2,500 per month. This number is not out of line with the average small rural city spending on lobbyist firms. The average small rural city in California spends between $3,500 and $5,000 per month.

Economic Impacts:

The funds spent on Rojas Public Affairs brings unlimited benefits to the community.

Budget Impacts:

Upon approval of this item, the FY 2025-26 budget will be adjusted to increase 001-011-52015 (Administration, Professional Services) by $5,000.

Legal Review:

City Attorney Pucci has reviewed this item and has found that it complies with the law.

Recommended Action:

Council to consider approval of the updated agreement with Rojas Public Affairs at a monthly 14 fee of $2,500.

Approved By: Ethan Aukee 8/14/2025
Approved By: Robin Picken 8/14/2025
Approved By: Deston Dishion 8/14/2025
Approved By:
15 August 7, 2025
Mr. Deston Dishion
City Administrator
City of Bishop
377 West Line Street
Bishop, CA 93514
Dear Mr. Dishion,
I am writing to provide you with an overview of our firm and the scope of services we have provided the past two years for the City of Bishop (Bishop). Rojas Public Affairs (RPA) was established over ten years ago with deep California connections and a locally focused approach. We have extensive experience representing governmental entities and are uniquely qualified to partner with the City of Bishop. Additionally, the RPA team maintains a strong presence in Sacramento and Washington, D.C. with an offices just blocks from the State Capitol and the U.S. Capitol.

RPA Background
For over ten years, RPA has provided a wide range of services to organizations across various sectors—including local governments, Fortune 500 companies, and trade associations. We have supported clients in navigating policy, regulatory, and funding environments in both California and Washington, D.C. We’ve helped clients advance key policy initiatives, secure public funding, and implement large-scale, multi-million-dollar development projects.

Our team is known for its in-depth knowledge, creative strategy, and commitment to integrity, which has earned us the long-term trust of our clients. Many consider us an extension of their team—responsive, strategic, and results-driven. In the past 4 years, RPA has been responsible in getting over $80 million in funding for its local government clients through its expertise in state member requests and federal earmarks process.

Scope of Services
RPA will work in partnership with Bishop to expand access to state and regional resources— including funding opportunities for capital improvement projects, water systems, road infrastructure, and more. Our proposed services include:
• Raising Bishop’s profile with the California State Senate (Senator Alvardo-Gil), Assembly (Assemblyman Tangipa), relevant state agencies, Governor Newsome’s Office, and local government agencies.
16 • Building support for Bishop’s priorities among state legislators, the Inyo County Board of Supervisors, and other influential decision-makers. • Coordinating meetings and advocacy trips in Sacramento to engage with elected officials and key agency staff.
• Assisting Bishop with state and local policy issues, including drafting public comments, securing letters of support for grant applications, and facilitating agency connections.
• Creating and executing a targeted state funding and advocacy strategy, with a focus on member requests and grants that support Bishop’s specific goals and funding priorities.

Rojas Public Affairs Leadership
Jaime Rojas, Jr. - President, Rojas Public Affairs
Jaime Rojas brings over 25 years of experience in public affairs, public relations, and community outreach at the local, state, and federal levels. A former staffer in the Clinton White House, Jaime has also worked for UPS and Lucent Technologies and previously served as President of the California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce. He holds undergraduate and graduate degrees from USC, where he has also taught at the Sol Price School of Public Policy. Jaime is based in Rancho Cucamonga and is proud to serve clients across the great state of California. RPA has offices also in Sacramento, San Diego and Washington, D.C.
17 Rojas Public Affairs appreciates the years working with the City of Bishop and our continued partnership. RPA is increasing our monthly retainer an additional $500 for a total of $2,500 per month. We are prepared to move forward with the new pricing starting on September 1, 2025. The table below outlines the services RPA provides to Bishop:

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES MONTHY
FEE
State Legislative Advocacy Services $2,500
• Conduct Detailed Orientation/Kick-Off Meeting Included • Develop Annual Legislative Strategy Included
• Implement Annual Legislative Strategy Included
• Build and Strengthen Sacramento Relationships Included • Leverage Relationships for Strategic Advocacy Included • Coordinate & Schedule Advocacy Trip (Sacramento) Included • Track State Legislation Included
• Craft State Testimony and Position Letters Included
• Member Request Opportunities / Proposition 4 Applications Included • Work with Bishop Team for Seamless Strategy Included
• Advocate for State Agency/ Submitted Grant Applications Included • Provide Progress Reports Included
• Prepare and File Lobbying Disclosure Reports Included *The monthly fee does not include any business and travel expenses 18 Thank you for taking the time to review this updated proposal. Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions.

Very respectfully,
Jaime Rojas
President
Rojas Public Affairs
6782 Plum Way
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739
(213) 400-8664
[email protected]
19 DRAFT CITY OF BISHOP

MONTHLY SALARY SCHEDULE
July 1, 2025 - June 30, 2026
DRAFT

ADMINISTRATION
Position Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Fixed
City Administrator $15,745
Assistant to the City Administrator (Not Filled) $8,006 $8,807 $9,598 City Clerk $8,865
Personnel/Payroll & Benefits Specialist $8,365
Executive Secretary/Assistant City Clerk (Not Filled) $5,717 $6,291 $6,920 $7,612 Administrative Support Assistant $4,983 $5,483 $6,029 $6,634

FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Position Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Fixed
Finance Director $8,865 $9,752 $10,726
Accounting Secretary/Budget Manager (Not Filled) $5,718 $6,291 $6,920 $7,612 Administrative / Accounting Assistant (Not Filled) $4,529 $4,985 $5,481 $6,031

COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Position Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Fixed
Community Services Director (Not Filled) $11,913
Community Services Manager $8,041
Community Services Administrative Assistant $4,529 $4,985 $5,481 $6,031 Parks Supervisor $4,921 $5,384 $5,956 $7,011
Recreation Supervisor (Not Filled) $4,687 $5,158 $5,672 $6,677 Parks Facilities Lead Worker $4,472 $4,919 $5,411 $5,952

FIRE DEPARTMENT
Position Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Fixed
Fire Chief $11,913
Deputy Fire Chief (Not Filled) $10,358
Assistant Fire Chief (Not Filled) $3,646 $4,010 $4,412 $4,852 Fire Captain $5,341 $5,877 $6,465 $7,114
Engineer $4,529 $4,985 $5,481 $6,031
Administrative Assistant $4,529 $4,985 $5,481 $6,031

POLICE DEPARTMENT
Position Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Fixed
Chief $13,858
Captain $10,358 $11,394
Sergeant $7,773 $8,550 $9,404
Corporal $6,928 $7,621 $8,382
Police Officer $6,357 $7,063 $7,850
Police Officer in Training $4,802 $5,281 $5,811
Community Services Officer $4,529 $4,985 $5,481
Police Records Clerk $4,529 $4,985 $5,481 $6,031
Police Services Technician $4,583 $5,041 $5,545 $6,100
Senior Communications Operator $5,281 $5,810 $6,391 $7,029 Communications Operator $4,536 $5,039 $5,599 $6,221
20 DRAFT CITY OF BISHOP

MONTHLY SALARY SCHEDULE
July 1, 2025 - June 30, 2026
DRAFT

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Position Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Fixed
Public Works Director $12,979
Public Works Superintendent $10,174
Public Works Supervisor $6,496 $7,146 $7,858 $8,645
Building Inspector / Code Enforcement Officer $5,750 $6,325 $6,957 $7,653 Engineering Technician III $5,750 $6,325 $6,957 $7,653
Engineering Technician II $5,106 $5,617 $6,178 $6,796
Lead Maintenance Worker (Not Filled) $5,341 $5,877 $6,465 $7,114 Maintenance Worker $4,921 $5,384 $5,956 $6,551
Public Works Secretary $4,529 $4,985 $5,481 $6,031

PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Position Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Fixed
Principal Planner $8,667
Assistant Planner (Not Filled) $5,341 $5,877 $6,465 $7,114 Approved by Council on:

Cost of Living Adjustments for Miscellaneous, Mid-Management, Management, and Bishop Police Officers Association contracts for Fiscal Years as follows: 2025/2026 -

2.5%
For all Step Classifications -Step Increases occur annually with one year in between each step based on successful employee evaluations. 21 AGENDA ITEM NO.

TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

DATE:

NEW HIRES / RE-HIRES

DEPARTMENT POSITION

EFFECTIVE

DATE ACTION STATUS RATE EMPLOYEE NAME
A. FIRE VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTER 1/6/2025 $20.00 per call ESQUIVAL, VICTOR B. FIRE VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTER 4/7/2025 $20.00 per call HENCKEL, KELLY C. FIRE VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTER 4/7/2025 $20.00 per call JONES, MATTHEW D. FIRE VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTER 4/7/2025 $20.00 per call DURHAM, CLAIR E. FIRE VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTER 4/21/2025 $20.00 per call GANOUNG, INDIGO F. COMMUNITY SERVICES ATHLETIC COORDINATOR 4/24/2025 HIRED PART TIME $20.00 per hour HERNANDEZ, DIANE G. COMMUNITY SERVICES SPORTS OFFICIAL 4/24/2025 HIRED PART TIME $30.00 per game GONZALEZ, ROBERT H. COMMUNITY SERVICES LIFEGUARD 5/19/2025 HIRED PART TIME $18.00 per hour CHIRRICK, HALLE I. COMMUNITY SERVICES LIFEGUARD 5/19/2025 HIRED PART TIME $18.00 per hour FEENEY, MAYA J. COMMUNITY SERVICES LIFEGUARD 5/19/2025 HIRED PART TIME $18.00 per hour MARTINEZ, DULCE K. COMMUNITY SERVICES LIFEGUARD 5/19/2025 HIRED PART TIME $18.00 per hour NOESSER, COLIN L. COMMUNITY SERVICES LIFEGUARD 5/19/2025 HIRED PART TIME $18.00 per hour JOHNSON, BRADY M. FIRE VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTER 5/1/2024 $20.00 per call DEHAVEN, BRANDON N. COMMUNITY SERVICES LIFEGUARD 5/19/2025 HIRED PART TIME $18.00 per hour DAVIS, ELLARY O. COMMUNITY SERVICES LIFEGUARD 5/19/2025 HIRED PART TIME $18.00 per hour DEVINCENT, MALEAH P. COMMUNITY SERVICES LIFEGUARD 5/19/2025 HIRED PART TIME $18.00 per hour NOTT, CADENCE Q. COMMUNITY SERVICES LIFEGUARD 5/19/2025 HIRED PART TIME $18.00 per hour CLARK, DACIA R. COMMUNITY SERVICES LIFEGUARD 5/19/2025 HIRED PART TIME $18.00 per hour TRUELSEN, ALYSSA S. COMMUNITY SERVICES ACTIVITY LEADER 5/23/2025 HIRED PART TIME $18.00 per hour CORTES, GETHSEMANIE T. COMMUNITY SERVICES ACTIVITY LEADER 5/26/2025 HIRED PART TIME $18.00 per hour HARSHVI RAULJI U. COMMUNITY SERVICES LIFEGUARD 6/2/2025 HIRED PART TIME $18.00 per hour COKELEY, ZAVION V. COMMUNITY SERVICES ACTIVITY LEADER 6/2/2025 HIRED PART TIME $18.00 per hour GARCIA, MATTHEW W. COMMUNITY SERVICES PARK HELPER 7/21/2025 HIRED PART TIME $20.55 per hour LEESON, CHRISTOPHER X. POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS OPERATOR 5/26/2025 HIRED FULL TIME $5,039 per month POTTER, NINA

VOLUNTEER

CITY COUNCIL

DESTON DISHION, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
CONSENT CALENDAR – PERSONNEL STATUS CHANGE REPORT
August 25, 2025
The following personnel items have been submitted for action at this meeting:
22 Agenda Item: 8.A
Date of Meeting: August 25, 2025
Department: Planning
To: City Council
From: Ana Budnyk
Subject: Planning Commission Appointment Recommendations Prepared On: August 19, 2025

STAFF REPORT
Background/History:

The City of Bishop has conducted interviews to fill two vacancies on the Planning Commission due to the expiration of the terms of Commissioners Andrew Gaidus and Patricia Lew.

Per Section 5.3 of the City Council Standards and Procedures Manual, the City initiated a recruitment process that included:

Public advertisement of the vacancies.

Direct notification to City Council Members.

Encouragement for both incumbents and new applicants to apply.

Applicants residing within the City limits.

Submission of completed and timely applications to the City Clerk All appointees must not be current City employees or serving on any other City board, committee, or commission, unless otherwise permitted by statute. The standard term of service for Planning Commissioners is four years, unless filling an unexpired vacancy.

Recruitment & Interview Process
The City received a total of nine applications and conducted interviews with five candidates.

The interview panel included:

Stephen Muchovej, Mayor Pro Tem
Jose Garcia, Council Member
Deston Dishion, City Administrator
Ana Budnyk, Principal Planner
The committee evaluated candidates based on several factors, including:
23 Commitment to public service
Availability to attend regular and special meetings
Qualifications and relevant experience
Attendance record of incumbents
Analysis/Discussion:

After thorough review and discussion, the interview committee recommends the following:

1. Reappointment of Commissioner Patricia Lew, citing her dedication, experience, and consistent attendance.

2. Appointment of Casey Stroud, whose background and availability reflect a strong commitment to contributing to the Planning Commission's work.

3. Recognizing and thanking Andrew Gaidus for his service on the Commission since January 2021.

Economic Impacts:
n/a
Budget Impacts:
n/a
Legal Review:

Attorney Dean J. Pucci has reviewed and approved the item.

Recommended Action:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Reappoint Patricia Lew to a new four-year term ending August 25, 2029 on the Planning Commission.

2. Appoint Casey Stroud to a four-year term ending August 25, 2029 on the Planning Commission.

Approved By: Dean J. Pucci / 8/19/2025
Approved By: Deston Dishion 8/19/25
Approved By:

Approved By:
24 Agenda Item: 8.B
Date of Meeting: August 25, 2025
Department: Public Works
To: City Council
From: Nora Gamino
Subject: LS-1 Option E Streetlight Conversion Agreement with Southern California Edison
Prepared On: August 20, 2025
Attachments: 1 AB719 LS-1 Option E Agreement_Redacted
LS-1 Lights Map
LS-1 Option E Closure Deck

STAFF REPORT
Background/History:

The City of Bishop currently receives streetlight service under Southern California Edison’s LS-1 tariff. Under this program, SCE owns, operates, and maintains the streetlight fixtures.

The California Public Utilities Commission approved LS-1 Option E in 2016, which allows cities to replace aging HPSV fixtures with LEDs through a tariff-based repayment mechanism instead of upfront costs.

SCE has announced the closure of the LS-1 Option E program effective October 1, 2025, making this the final opportunity for the City to participate.

Analysis/Discussion:

The agreement authorizes SCE to replace 69 HPSV fixtures in Bishop (30 × 100W, 20 × 200W, 19 × 250W) with equivalent LED fixtures. SCE will continue to own and maintain the fixtures, and the City will pay the Option E tariff rate, which includes a repayment charge spread over 20 years.

Benefits of participation include:

Reduced utility costs, with annual savings beginning immediately.

Improved lighting quality, visibility, and safety for motorists and pedestrians.

Energy efficiency and reduced greenhouse gas emissions.

Dark-sky compliant lighting to reduce light pollution.

No disruption during installation, which is typically completed in minutes per fixture.

Light Color Selection
As part of the program, the City must select the color temperature for the LED fixtures. SCE 25 offers three choices: 2700K, 3000K, and 4000K. Warmer colors (2700K or 3000K) are generally recommended for residential and community settings. They reduce glare, are more comfortable for the human eye at night, and are more compatible with dark-sky goals. Cooler white light (4000K) can appear harsh, increase light pollution, and affect nocturnal wildlife.

Staff recommends Council select either 2700K or 3000K for Bishop’s conversion, with 3000K providing a good balance of efficiency, visibility, and neighborhood compatibility.

If the City does not participate, it will forego cost savings and improved safety and will lose the chance to join before the program closes.

Economic Impacts:

There are no significant economic impacts.

Budget Impacts:

Projected annual savings during the 20-year repayment period are approximately $6,150. After repayment, annual savings are expected to increase to about $7,686. Streetlight utility costs are paid under the street’s expense line 001-023-52010.

Legal Review:

City Attorney Pucci has reviewed this item and finds that the recommended action complies with the law.

Recommended Action:

Council consideration to authorize the City Administrator to execute the Schedule LS-1 Option E Energy Efficiency LED Fixture Replacement Rate Agreement with Southern California Edison (SCE) to convert SCE-owned high-pressure sodium vapor (HPSV) streetlights in the City of Bishop to LED fixtures, and to select [2700K or 3000K] as the City’s preferred light color temperature.

Approved By: Ethan Aukee 8/20/2025
Approved By: Deston Dishion 8/20/25
Approved By:

Approved By:
26 Southern California Edison Original Cal. PUC Sheet No. 57074-E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Sheet 1
SCHEDULE LS-1 OPTION E,

ENERGY EFFICIENCY-LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) FIXTURE REPLACEMENT

RATE AGREEMENT
Form 14-965
(To be inserted by utility) Issued by (To be inserted by Cal. PUC) Advice 3241-E R.O. Nichols Date Filed Jun 30, 2015
Decision 14-10-046 Senior Vice President Effective Jun 1, 2016 1P8 Resolution
27 Form 14-965
06/2016
1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
SCHEDULE LS-1 OPTION E, ENERGY EFFICIENCY-LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED)

FIXTURE REPLACEMENT RATE AGREEMENT
This Schedule LS-1 Option E, Energy Efficiency-Light Emitting Diode (LED) Fixture Replacement Rate Agreement (Agreement), effective this 25 of August _(Effective Date), is entered into between Southern California Edison Company (SCE) and City of Bishop_____, an SCE customer taking service on Schedule LS-1 (Applicant), referred to collectively as "Parties," and individually as "Party." This Agreement provides for SCE, at Applicant’s request, to replace the existing street lighting fixtures serving Applicant’s premises with Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting fixtures to achieve energy efficiency benefits for Applicant, as set forth in Special Condition 14, Option E, Energy Efficiency-Light Emitting Diode (LED) Fixture Replacement, of Schedule LS-1.

The Parties agree as follows:

1. LED FIXTURES
SCE shall install, own, operate, and maintain LED Fixtures for Applicant as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The LED Fixtures provided hereunder shall at all times remain the property of SCE.

2. LED FIXTURE REPLACEMENT COSTS

2.1 The replacement costs of the LED Fixtures provided hereunder shall be borne by Applicant.

2.2 Applicant shall pay the charge for the LED Fixtures Replacement rate, which includes an Energy Efficiency Premium Charge (EEPC) and a Base LED Charge, under Option E of Schedule LS-1. Applicant elects Option E in lieu of an upfront, one-time payment of the replacement costs.

2.3 SCE does not guarantee that any energy or bill savings will accrue to Applicant as a result of the LED Fixture replacements.

3. COMMENCEMENT OF SERVICE
The Parties agree that SCE has the right to charge Applicant, and Applicant has an obligation to pay SCE, for the charges set forth in Schedule LS-1, Option E, commencing on the date SCE begins serving the LED Fixtures installed pursuant to this Agreement.

4. TERM AND TERMINATION

4.1 This Agreement shall be effective as of the Effective Date and shall continue for a term of twenty (20) years from the commencement of service as specified in Section 3 above (Term).

4.2 Applicant may terminate this Agreement at any time during the Term upon a thirty (30) - day advance written notice, provided that Applicant, prior to or within the 30-day advance notice period, assigns the Agreement to any New Party In (NPI) that owns, rents or leases the premises served by the street lighting fixtures replaced under this Agreement and will take service under Option E of Schedule LS-1 effective as of the date of termination; otherwise, Applicant shall pay a one-time termination charge equal to the present value of the balance of the EEPC of Option E over the remaining Term. The present value is determined based on SCE’s authorized rate of return on rate base, or discounted rate of

7.90%.
28 29
30 31
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!

N MAIN ST

HOME ST
WYE RD
MAY ST

E LINE ST

SIERRA ST

S MAIN ST

HANBY AVE

CLARKE ST
S 3RD ST

SPRUCE ST

E PINE ST

N SIERRA HWY

PARK AVE

W LINE ST

W YANEY ST E YANEY ST

E WILLOW ST

SHORT ST

E JAY ST

N FOWLER ST

CHURCH ST
S 1ST ST

E ELM ST

S FOWLER ST
N 2ND ST

N WARREN ST

KEOUGH ST
S 2ND ST

MACIVER ST

LAGOON ST

E SOUTH ST

SNEDEN ST

FULTON ST

W SOUTH ST

KELSO RD

SCHLEY ST

HAMMOND ST

HOBSON ST

S WARREN ST

MANDICH ST

W ELM ST

GROVE ST
HIGH S
RO
T
SE ST

ROME DR

W PINE ST
N 3RD ST
L ALY
S ALY
E ALY
C ALY
LEE ST

B ALY R ALY
D ALY

CENTRAL ST
M ALY

HOWARD ST

MAPLE ST

SYCAMORE DR

MOFFETT DR

ACADEMY AVE

WHITNEY ALY

COATS ST

BUSH ST

CROSBY ST

POLETA RD

COURT PL

ACADEMY ST

HIGH SCHOOL DR

CHAMBERLA NI ST

EDWARDS ST

N MAIN ST

E SOUTH ST

SHORT ST

W ELM ST

GROVE ST

S MAIN ST

E YANEY ST

W PINE ST
N 3RD ST

W LINE ST
23411725
23391725
23371725 23371722
23431725
23391722
23411722
23431722
23351722 23351725
City of Bishop Overvew
! LS1 Pole Locations
SCE Map Grids
Major Roads
Highway
Freeways
SCE Districts
Cities
32 LED Street Light Replacement Effort
LS-1 Option E Closure
LED Street Light Replacements for SCE Owned (LS-1) Fixtures 33 34
SCE LS-1 Option E
• Option E is the program and opportunity to change out existing SCE owned High Pressure Sodium (HPSV) street light fixtures in SCE communities (the program is specific to “cobra-head” style fixtures)
• Local government and street light customers experience financial and energy savings as soon as the project is complete
• SCE utilizes “latest generation” GE Evolve Roadway Fixtures which feature superior optics, are “dark sky” compliant, and greatly improve visual acuity – over 365,000 lights have been changed across the SCE territory to date • Superior ability to “see” color beneath new LED lights versus HPSV • New LED lights provide better visibility, translating to safer driving and pedestrian conditions
• New LED lights save significant energy and lower the community’s overall carbon footprint
35 Option E Closing to New Entrants
• After 1 October 2025, SCE will no longer accept agreements to participate in the LS-1 Option E program
• There are a small number of communities that have not participated in the LS-1 Option E Program – this is a notification and advisory that the program will be closing to new entrants, and this is the “last opportunity” to participate
• The period between now and 1 October 2025 provides time to review and act upon the opportunity to participate should a community choose to enter the queue
• To participate, customers simply need to sign the simple Option E agreement and confirm the color temperature choice for their community 36 37
Across SCE Territory
–
Over 365,000 Lights
Implemented • SCE offers three color temperatures for
street light replacements: • 2,700k, 3,000k, and 4,000k. • Most communities have adopted 3,000k while some use a mix of
4,000k on arterial streets and
3,000k in residential areas.

Communities must specify the color
temperature of their choice.
38 39
Next Steps…
40 Requirements to Move Forward
• Community to sign LS-1 Option E authorization
• Community confirms color temperature
• Work with SCE to facilitate no-fee encroachment permit if required before implementation begins
• SCE manages and implements the project from start to finish • Crews spend roughly 10 minutes to replace each light during implementation and work from curbside
• SCE transitions billing as soon as project is complete (usually takes roughly 90 days to complete billing transition to new LED rate)
• City will receive credit from the time billing is transitioned back to the date installation was completed to ensure customer receives full savings and is whole
41 Agenda Item: 8.C
Date of Meeting: August 25, 2025
Department: Public Works
To: City Council
From: Nora Gamino
Subject: Introduction to Water and Sewer Rate Study and Capital Improvement Plans
Prepared On: August 20, 2025
Attachments: Introduction to Water and Sewer Rate Study and Capital Improvement Plans Presentation

STAFF REPORT
Background/History:

The City of Bishop Public Works Department provides water and sewer services to approximately 1,200 service connections. These enterprise funds are self-supporting through user charges and are separate from the City’s General Fund.

The last comprehensive water and sewer rate study was completed in 2018, with rates adopted through 2024. The rates used in 2025 were held over from 2024 with no adjustment.

The City should adopt new rates beginning in 2026 to ensure the financial stability of the utilities and to support capital reinvestment. Proposition 218 governs the process for adopting water and sewer rates, requiring notice and a public hearing.

A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a multi-year roadmap of planned infrastructure investments. The plans focus on large, one-time capital projects such as water main replacements, sewer collection system rehabilitation, and facility and equipment upgrades.

CIPs help prioritize limited resources, provide transparency in budgeting, position the City for grants and low-interest loans, and play a critical role in projecting future capital costs for use in the rate-setting process
Analysis/Discussion:

The draft Water CIP identifies approximately $3.97 million in rate-funded projects between FY 2027 and FY 2030. These projects include pipeline replacements (about $2.07 million to improve fire flows), well improvements, and equipment/vehicle purchases. The fire flow improvements have a strong potential for low-cost loan funding, such as through State and USDA programs.

The draft Sewer CIP identifies approximately $2.8 million in rate-funded projects between FY 2026 and FY 2030. These projects address deferred maintenance, collection system 42 rehabilitation, and preparation for the new consolidated regional Bishop Area Wastewater Authority (BAWA) treatment plant development. Importantly, the Sewer CIP also includes a substantial program of grant-funded projects. These projects focus on larger-scale collection system rehabilitation efforts and source sustainability. These projects are expected to be covered in large part by USDA Rural Development grant and Water Resources Development Act funding. This approach significantly reduces the direct rate impact to customers, while ensuring critical system upgrades move forward.

Both CIPs present three funding options that represent a range of choices for how to deliver the capital program. The high option assumes that the entire CIP is funded with cash from rates and reserves. This option ensures that all identified projects are completed on schedule, but it places the greatest burden on ratepayers because no outside financing is used to spread costs over time.

The medium option combines cash funding with outside loans. This approach still allows the full CIP to move forward but lowers the immediate rate impact by financing a portion of the work and repaying it gradually. While loans increase long-term obligations, they provide a more balanced path for customers by smoothing costs over the life of the assets.

The low option minimizes the immediate impact to ratepayers by deferring certain projects and not fully funding the CIP. While this reduces near-term funding needs, it carries the greatest long-term risks, as deferred projects may lead to higher costs in the future and expose the system to potential service or compliance issues.

For the Water Fund, the medium option maintains reserves at about $2.4 million, while the allcash (high) and deferred (low) approaches reduce reserves by about $500,000. For the Sewer Fund, all options retain about $2.5 million in reserves, with the difference being whether a $1 million or $1.5 million BAWA reserve is accumulated by FY 2030.

Economic Impacts:

There are no direct economic impacts from Council’s consideration of the draft CIP plans or providing direction on the rate structures. However, adoption of these plans will influence future rate adjustments, which in turn will affect utility customers.

Budget Impacts:

There are no immediate budget impacts. The CIP plans are planning documents that will be used to inform future budgets and the water and sewer rate-setting process.

Legal Review:

City Attorney Pucci has reviewed this item and finds that the recommended action complies with the law.

Recommended Action:

City Council consideration of the draft Water and Sewer Capital Improvement Plans (CIP) and related financial planning information. Staff is seeking direction regarding the preferred approach to funding and rate setting.

Approved By: Ethan Aukee 8/20/2025
Approved By: Deston Dishion 8/21/25
Approved By:
43 Approved By:
44  A multi-year roadmap of planned infrastructure investments.  Focuses on large, one-time capital projects (not routine operations or maintenance).
 Prioritizes projects to maintain reliable service and meet regulations
 Provides transparency for the public and accountability in budgeting.
 Positions the City to apply for state and federal grants or loans.  Updated regularly to reflect changing priorities, regulations, and funding.
 Play a critical role in water and sewer rate setting by projecting future capital costs.
1 Capital Improvement Plans (CIP)
Water & Sewer
45 2
46 347
Water and Sewer Rate Study
August 25, 2025
Alison Lechowicz
Project Manager

CITY OF BISHOP
48 Background
 The City of Bishop (City) provides water and sewer service to about 1,200 connections
 Water and Sewer Funds are Enterprise Funds
 Self supported from rates and charges
 Separate from General Fund
 The last water and sewer rate study was conducted in 2018 and adjusted rates through 2024
 Rate study covers a 5-year period
 Rate increases effective January 1 of 2026; July 1 of 2026, 2027, 2028, and 2029 5 49
Legal Requirements: Proposition 218
 Governs how water and sewer service charges can be
calculated and adopted
 Rates can be adopted over a maximum 5-year period with a single study  Rates must be based on the reasonable cost of providing service  Rates must proportionally recover costs based on how customers take service  Procedural requirements for adopting rate adjustments: mail a notice of hearing and conduct hearing at least 45 days later  Ratepayers can block the increase with a 50% protest
 Ratepayers can also submit Written Objections
6 50
 Current financial position of each utility fund:
 The main financial challenge is to fund infrastructure improvements, plan for the BAWA expansion, and keep up with inflationary cost increases
Sewer Fund ($M)
Cash Reserves $2.54
Annual Revenues $1.47
Operating Expenses ($1.31)
Debt Service $0.00
Net $0.16
Financial Overview
7 Water Fund ($M)
Cash Reserves $2.37
Annual Revenues $1.23
Operating Expenses ($1.22)
Debt Service ($0.07)
Net ($0.06)
51 WATER FUND
52 Water Infrastructure Needs
 Water Fund has a draft capital improvement plan consisting of about $3.97M in rate funded projects in FY2027 to FY2030. Funding for these are TBD by the rate study.
 Projects include pipeline replacements, improvements to wells, vehicles and equipment
 About $2.072M of projects are needed to improve pipelines for fire flow. Fire flow projects have a greater likelihood of receiving low-cost loans.
 3 funding options are provided herein. All options meet the Water Fund cash reserve target for FY2030.
 Option 3 maintains existing reserves of $2.4M. Options 1 and 2 draw down reserves by about $500,000.
9 53
Water CIP Funding Options
10 ANNUAL FUNDING OPTION 1: $2M loan
w/Low CIP
Annual Cost to Ratepayers $300,000
Made up of
Debt Service* $95,000
CIP Cash Funding $205,000

TOTAL FUNDING
FY27 to FY30
OPTION 1: $2M loan
w/Low CIP
New Debt Proceeds $2,072,000
Cash Funding Over 4 Years $820,000
Total (goal is $3.973M) $2,892,000
Not Funded ($1,081,000)
*$2.072M loan to fund fire lines at 3.375% interest over 40 years (USDA) ANNUAL FUNDING OPTION 1: $2M loan
w/Low CIP
OPTION 2: $2M loan
w/Full CIP
Annual Cost to Ratepayers $300,000 $570,000
Made up of
Debt Service* $95,000 $95,000
CIP Cash Funding $205,000 $475,000

TOTAL FUNDING
FY27 to FY30
OPTION 1: $2M loan
w/Low CIP
OPTION 2: $2M loan
w/Full CIP
New Debt Proceeds $2,072,000 $2,072,000
Cash Funding Over 4 Years $820,000 $1,900,000
Total (goal is $3.973M) $2,892,000 $3,972,000
Not Funded ($1,081,000) ($1,000)
ANNUAL FUNDING OPTION 1: $2M loan
w/Low CIP
OPTION 2: $2M loan
w/Full CIP
OPTION 3: All Cash
w/Full CIP + Maintain
Reserve
Annual Cost to Ratepayers $300,000 $570,000 $993,000
Made up of
Debt Service* $95,000 $95,000 $0
CIP Cash Funding $205,000 $475,000 $993,000

TOTAL FUNDING
FY27 to FY30
OPTION 1: $2M loan
w/Low CIP
OPTION 2: $2M loan
w/Full CIP
OPTION 3: All Cash
w/Full CIP + Maintain
Reserve
New Debt Proceeds $2,072,000 $2,072,000 $0
Cash Funding Over 4 Years $820,000 $1,900,000 $3,972,000 Total (goal is $3.973M) $2,892,000 $3,972,000 $3,972,000 Not Funded ($1,081,000) ($1,000) ($1,000)
54 Water Rate Option Comparison
11  Proposed Annual Rate Revenue Increases:

Jan 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Jul 1, 2028 Jul 1, 2029 Opt 1: $2M Loan
w/Low CIP 29.5% 15.0% 15.0% 9.0% 9.0%
Jan 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Jul 1, 2028 Jul 1, 2029 Opt 1: $2M Loan
w/Low CIP 29.5% 15.0% 15.0% 9.0% 9.0%
Opt 2: $2M Loan
w/Full CIP 36.0% 20.0% 20.0% 9.0% 9.0%
Jan 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Jul 1, 2028 Jul 1, 2029 Opt 1: $2M Loan
w/Low CIP 29.5% 15.0% 15.0% 9.0% 9.0%
Opt 2: $2M Loan
w/Full CIP 36.0% 20.0% 20.0% 9.0% 9.0%
Opt 3: All Cash
w/Full CIP +
Maintain Reserve

55.0% 25.0% 25.0% 9.0% 9.0%
55 Residential Water Rate Comparison
12 PROPOSED MONTHLY WATER BILL
Current Jan 1,
2026
Jul 1,
2026
Jul 1,
2027
Jul 1,
2028
Jul 1,
2029
OPTION 1: $2M Loan w/Low CIP
Single Family Residence $33.00 $42.74 $49.15 $56.52 $61.61 $67.15 % Change 29.5% 15.0% 15.0% 9.0% 9.0%
Table does not reflect potential rate design changes.

July 2018 single family residence water rate was $37.00.

PROPOSED MONTHLY WATER BILL
Current Jan 1,
2026
Jul 1,
2026
Jul 1,
2027
Jul 1,
2028
Jul 1,
2029
OPTION 1: $2M Loan w/Low CIP
Single Family Residence $33.00 $42.74 $49.15 $56.52 $61.61 $67.15 % Change 29.5% 15.0% 15.0% 9.0% 9.0%
OPTION 2: $2M Loan w/Full CIP
Single Family Residence $33.00 $44.88 $53.86 $64.63 $70.45 $76.79 % Change 36.0% 20.0% 20.0% 9.0% 9.0%
OPTION 3: All Cash w/Full CIP + Maintain Reserve
Single Family Residence $33.00 $51.15 $63.94 $79.93 $87.12 $94.96 % Change 55.0% 25.0% 25.0% 9.0% 9.0%
56 13 57
Water Bill Survey
14 58

SEWER FUND
59 Sewer Infrastructure Needs
 Sewer Fund has a draft capital improvement plan consisting of about $2.8M in rate funded projects in FY2026 to FY2030.
 The City needs to fund deferred maintenance projects and plan for expansion of the BAWA treatment plant.
16  3 funding options are provided herein.
 All options retain about $2.5M of Sewer Fund
cash reserves
 Options 1 and 2 generate $1M BAWA reserve
vs. $1.5M BAWA reserve for Option 3.
60 Sewer CIP Funding Options
17 ANNUAL FUNDING
OPTION 1: $1.4M
loan w/Low CIP;
$1M BAWA Reserve
Annual Cost to Ratepayers $300,000
Made up of
Debt Service* $64,300
CIP Cash Funding $235,700

TOTAL FUNDING
FY27 to FY30
OPTION 1: $1.4M
loan w/Low CIP;
$1M BAWA Reserve
New Debt Proceeds $1,400,000
Cash Funding Over 4 Years $942,800
Total Non-BAWA $2,342,800
BAWA Reserve $1,000,000
*Each loan at 3.375% interest over 40 years (USDA)

ANNUAL FUNDING
OPTION 1: $1.4M
loan w/Low CIP;
$1M BAWA Reserve
OPTION 2: $700k loan
w/Full CIP; $1M BAWA
Reserve
Annual Cost to Ratepayers $300,000 $560,000
Made up of
Debt Service* $64,300 $32,100
CIP Cash Funding $235,700 $527,900

ANNUAL FUNDING
OPTION 1: $1.4M
loan w/Low CIP;
$1M BAWA Reserve
OPTION 2: $700k loan
w/Full CIP; $1M BAWA
Reserve
OPTION 3: All Cash
w/Full CIP; $1.5M
BAWA Reserve
Annual Cost to Ratepayers $300,000 $560,000 $702,000
Made up of
Debt Service* $64,300 $32,100 $0
CIP Cash Funding $235,700 $527,900 $702,000

TOTAL FUNDING
FY27 to FY30
OPTION 1: $1.4M
loan w/Low CIP;
$1M BAWA Reserve
OPTION 2: $700k loan
w/Full CIP; $1M BAWA
Reserve
New Debt Proceeds $1,400,000 $700,000
Cash Funding Over 4 Years $942,800 $2,111,600
Total Non-BAWA $2,342,800 $2,811,600
BAWA Reserve $1,000,000 $1,000,000

TOTAL FUNDING
FY27 to FY30
OPTION 1: $1.4M
loan w/Low CIP;
$1M BAWA Reserve
OPTION 2: $700k loan
w/Full CIP; $1M BAWA
Reserve
OPTION 3: All Cash
w/Full CIP; $1.5M
BAWA Reserve
New Debt Proceeds $1,400,000 $700,000 $0
Cash Funding Over 4 Years $942,800 $2,111,600 $2,808,000 Total Non-BAWA $2,342,800 $2,811,600 $2,808,000
BAWA Reserve $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000
61 Sewer Rate Option Comparison
18  Proposed Annual Rate Revenue Increases:

Jan 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Jul 1, 2028 Jul 1, 2029 Opt 1: $1.4M loan
w/Low CIP; $1M
BAWA Reserve
9% 9% 9% 9% 9%
Jan 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Jul 1, 2028 Jul 1, 2029 Opt 1: $1.4M loan
w/Low CIP; $1M
BAWA Reserve
9% 9% 9% 9% 9%
Opt 2: $700k loan
w/Full CIP; $1M
BAWA Reserve
13% 13% 13% 9% 9%
Jan 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2026 Jul 1, 2027 Jul 1, 2028 Jul 1, 2029 Opt 1: $1.4M loan
w/Low CIP; $1M
BAWA Reserve
9% 9% 9% 9% 9%
Opt 2: $700k loan
w/Full CIP; $1M
BAWA Reserve
13% 13% 13% 9% 9%
OPTION 3: All Cash
w/Full CIP; $1.5M
BAWA Reserve
19% 19% 19% 9% 9%
62 Residential Sewer Rate Comparison
19 Table does not reflect potential rate design changes.

PROPOSED MONTHLY SEWER BILL
Current Jan 1,
2026
Jul 1,
2026
Jul 1,
2027
Jul 1,
2028
Jul 1,
2029
OPTION 1: $1.4M Loan w/Low CIP; $1M BAWA Reserve
Single Family Residence $42.00 $45.78 $49.90 $54.39 $59.29 $64.63 % Change 9% 9% 9% 9% 9%
OPTION 2: $700k Loan w/Full CIP; $1M BAWA Reserve
Single Family Residence $42.00 $47.25 $53.16 $59.81 $65.19 $71.06 % Change 13% 13% 13% 9% 9%
OPTION 3: All Cash w/Full CIP; $1.5M BAWA Reserve
Single Family Residence $42.00 $49.98 $59.48 $70.78 $77.15 $84.09 % Change 19% 19% 19% 9% 9%
63 20 64
Sewer Bill Survey
21 65
Combined Bill Survey
22 66
Residential Water & Sewer Rate Comparison
23 Table does not reflect potential rate design changes.

PROPOSED MONTHLY UTILITY BILL
Current Jan 1,
2026
Jul 1,
2026
Jul 1,
2027
Jul 1,
2028
Jul 1,
2029
OPTION 1
Single Family Residence $75.00 $88.52 $99.05 $110.91 $120.90 $131.78 % Change 18.0% 11.9% 12.0% 9.0% 9.0%
OPTION 2
Single Family Residence $75.00 $92.13 $107.02 $124.44 $135.64 $147.85 % Change 22.8% 16.2% 16.3% 9.0% 9.0%
OPTION 3
Single Family Residence $75.00 $101.13 $123.42 $150.71 $164.27 $179.05 % Change 34.8% 22.0% 22.1% 9.0% 9.0%
67 Tentative Schedule
24  August 25: Present draft financial plan options to City Council  Revise rate proposal based on feedback
 September 22: Present final recommendations
 September 26: Mail a notice to property owners
 November 10: Proposition 218 hearing (agenda item at the Council Meeting)
 December 8: Proposition 218 hearing back-up date
 Absent a majority protest, the rates can go into effect on January 1, 2026
68 Wrap Up
25 69

Bishop City CouncilAugust 25, 2025

Bishop City Council
August 25, 2025