Agenda packet — Bishop City Council, October 27, 2025 (part 1 of 2)

CITY OF BISHOP

CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
City Council Chambers - 301 West Line Street - Bishop, California MONDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2025 - 5:00 PM

1. CALL TO ORDER - 5:00 p.m. Monday, October 27, 2025

2. ROLL CALL
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: Please be advised this meeting is accessible to the public in person, on the City of Bishop website, or on the local government cable channel 12. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at 760-873-5863 Extension 124. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. [28 CFR

35.102.35.104 ADA Title II].

The public is encouraged to participate or observe this meeting by:

1. Attending this meeting in person at the City of Bishop City Council Chambers located at 301 West Line Street in Bishop, California.

2. Observing this meeting live from the City of Bishop website at:
https://www.cityofbishop.com/government/city_council/index.php

3. Observe this meeting live from the local government cable channel 12.

Public comments may be made:

1. In person: Members of the public desiring to speak on a matter appearing on the agenda should ask the Mayor for the opportunity to be heard when the item comes up for Council consideration (or complete a speaker card prior to the meeting). Comments for all agenda items are limited to a speaking time of three minutes unless modified by the Mayor.

2. In writing: Go to http://bishop-ca.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=8 to submit an "eComment" for the corresponding meeting. Please note that eComment submissions closes at 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. You may also hand deliver public comments to the City drop/payment box located at the Church Street entrance to City Hall on or before the deadline noted above. All written public comments received prior to the above noted time will be distributed to the Council for their review and consideration prior to the meeting. All written public comments received after that time will be provided to the Council at the earliest possibility. Please note written public comments received will not be read aloud at the meeting.

Any writing that is a public record that relates to an agenda item for open session distributed less than 72 hours prior to the meeting will be available for public inspection at City Hall, 377 West Line Street, Bishop, California during normal business hours.

Government Code 54957.5(b)(1). Copies will also be provided at the appropriate meeting.
1 3. PUBLIC COMMENT PRIOR TO CLOSED SESSION

4. CLOSED SESSION
A. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION pursuant to Government Code § 54957 – Title: City Administrator

5. OPEN SESSION - 6:00 p.m. Monday, October 27, 2025

6. MOMENT OF SILENCE

7. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Mayor Pro Tem Muchovej will lead the pledge of allegiance.

8. ROLL CALL

9. PUBLIC COMMENT

10. REPORT ON ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION AS REQUIRED BY LAW

11. PRESENTATIONS
A. PRESENTATION - Retirement of City of Bishop Police Captain Joshua Ellsworth
B. PRESENTATION - Bishop Tourism Improvement District (BTID) Annual Report - Presented by Bishop Area Chamber of Commerce and Information Center Executive Director Tawni Thomson.

C. PRESENTATION - Inyo Mono Advocates for Community Action (IMACA) Annual Report - Presented by IMACA Executive Director Kelly Barceloux.

12. PROCLAMATIONS
A. PROCLAMATION - Declaring October 2025 as Domestic Violence Awareness NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: This time is set aside to receive public comment on matters agendized for closed session only. When recognized by the Mayor, please state your name, and address for the record and please limit your comments to three minutes.

Under California law the City Council is prohibited from generally discussing or taking action on items not included in the agenda; however, the City Council may briefly respond to comments or questions from members of the public. Therefore, the City Council will listen to all public comment but will not generally discuss the matter or take action on it.

NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: This time is set aside to receive public comment on matters not calendared on the agenda. When recognized by the Mayor, please state your name and address for the record and please limit your comments to three minutes. Under California law the City Council is prohibited from generally discussing or taking action on items not included in the agenda; however, the City Council will listen to all public comment but will not generally discuss the matter or take action on it.

Recommended Action: Council will make presentations to Joshua "Josh" Ellsworth to honor his years of public service with the City of Bishop. 2024-2025 BTID Annual Report
2 Month in Bishop – To be received by Wild Iris/CASA Executive Director Dominic Hays.

13. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
A. Fire Department Report - Fire Chief Bret Russell
B. Police Department Report - Police Chief Nate Derr
C. Public Works Department Report - Public Works Director Nora Gamino D. Community Services Department Report - Community Services Manager Daniel McElroy
E. Planning Department Report - Principal Planner Ana Budnyk F. City Administrator Report - City Administrator Pam Foster

14. BISHOP AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & INFORMATION CENTER UPDATE A. Bishop Area Chamber of Commerce and Information Center Update Report - October 27, 2025

15. EASTERN SIERRA TRI-COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS QUARTERLY UPDATE REPORT A. Eastern Sierra Tri-County Fairgrounds Quarterly Update Report - Handout

16. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. City Council Regular Meeting Cancellation Notice
B. August 2025 Budget Report
Proclamation Wild Iris DVAM 2025 10 27
Updates on department activities will be given by the Department Heads and/or their staff.

Fire Department Report - September 2025
Police Department Report - September 2025
Public Works Department Report - September 2025
Community Services Department Report - September 2025
Planning Department Report - September 2025
City Administrator Report - September 2025 and October 2025 Prepared and presented by Bishop Area Chamber of Commerce and Information Center Executive Director Tawni Thomson.

BACCIC October 27 2025 City Council Report
Prepared and presented by Interim Fairgrounds Manager Mike Francesconi.

Item 15 - Handout
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: All matters under the Consent Calendar are considered routine by the City and will be acted on by one motion.

Recommended Action: Council is requested to receive and file the attached October 13, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting cancellation notice.

October 13 2025 Regular Meeting - Cancellation Notice
Recommended Action: City Council to review and accept the August 2025 Budget Report.
3 C. August 2025 Financial Reports
D. Administration Budget Adjustment Request
E. 2024-25 Grant in Support Reimbursement Claims Made
F. Granicus Agreement – Three-Year Extension 11/12/2025-11/11/2028 G. New Part Time Parking Enforcement Officer Job Description H. Full-time Engineering Technician I/II/III Job Description I. Full-Time and Part-Time Salary Schedules - July 1, 2025 - June 30, 2026 J. S. Warren Street Improvement Project Budget Adjustment Request August 2025 Budget Report
Recommended Action: City Council to review and accept the August 2025 Financial Reports.

August 2025 Bank Reconciliation Report
August 2025 Combined Cash Report
August 2025 Investment Portfolio Report
August 2025 Warrant Register Report
Recommended Action: City Council consideration to approve the proposed budget adjustment.

Recommended Action: City Council to authorize $32,000.00 in increased spending within GL account 001-019-52131 in fiscal year 2025-26.

Recommended Action: Council consideration to approve the proposed Granicus Subscription Renewal for the current services provided from November 12, 2025 to November 11, 2028 as presented, with a total cost of $52,487.73.

Granicus Agreement 2018-2021
Granicus Proposed Agreement for 11 12 2025 - 11 11 2028 Recommended Action: Approve the creation of a Part-Time Parking Enforcement Officer position within the Bishop Police Department.

Direct staff to add this classification to the City’s official position list and authorize recruitment.

Approve proposed Job description and EFA
Parking Enforcement Officer PT
EFA- Parking enforcement
Recommended Action: Council consideration to approve the proposed Engineering Technician I/II/III Job Description.

FT Public Works Engineering Technician I_ II_III
Recommended Action: Council consideration to approve the updated Salary Schedules for 2025/2026 fiscal year.
2025-2026 Part Time Salary Schedule - Parking Enforcement Officer Update 2025-2026 Full Time Salary Schedule-Captain Administrative correction, Engineering Tech I addition
Recommended Action: City Council consideration to approve the proposed budget adjustment.
4 K. Approval of Task Orders 25-TO-05 (HELIX Environmental Planning) and 25-TO07 (Lumos & Associates) and Related Budget Adjustment for the East Line Street Bridge Replacement Project
L. Declaration of City-Owned Equipment as Surplus
M. Consideration of Request from Coalition Against Bigger Trucks (CABT) for Letter Opposing Increases in Truck Size and Weight
N. Parks and Recreation Commission Meetings
O. Planning Commission Meetings

17. NEW BUSINESS
A. Adoption of the 2025–2030 Water and Sewer Capital Improvement Plans B. A-Frame Building (Bishop Area Chamber of Commerce and Visitors Center) - Structural Integrity and Site Considerations
Recommended Action: Council consideration to:

1. Approve Task Order 25-TO-05 with HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. in the not-to-exceed amount of $54,000;

2. Approve Task Order 25-TO-07 with Lumos & Associates in the not-to-exceed amount of $46,000;

3. Authorize the Public Works Director to execute the task orders on behalf of the City; and

4. Approve the budget adjustment transferring $110,000 from the General Fund to the East Line Street Bridge Replacement Project Fund.
25-TO-05 HELIX - Bridge Permitting
25-TO-07 Lumos - Bridge ROW Support
Recommended Action: Council consideration to declare the Public Works Department's Vaccon truck and trailer mounted chipper as surplus equipment.

Recommended Action: Council consideration to approve the attached letter from the Mayor, on behalf of the City of Bishop, to the City’s federal representatives opposing proposed increases in the allowable size and weight of commercial trucks, as requested by the Coalition Against Bigger Trucks (CABT).

CABT Draft Letter
Recommended Action: Council is requested to receive and file the attached Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting Notice.

Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting Cancellation Notice - October 22, 2025 Recommended Action: Council is requested to receive and file the attached Planning Commission Meeting Notices.

Planning Commission Meeting Cancellation Notice - October 28, 2025 Recommended Action: Council consideration to approve of the 2025–2030 Water and Sewer Capital Improvement Plans as presented. Water Projects CIP Sewer Projects CIP
Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and provide direction on the structural condition assessment report prepared by Wood Rodgers, 5 18. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

19. COUNCIL AND COMMITTEE REPORTS

20. ADJOURNMENT
Inc. regarding the current Chamber of Commerce Building in City Park.

Council direction is necessary regarding the future of the A-Frame building, including potential structural remediation, partial or full demolition, and other site planning options based on recent assessments and environmental considerations.

Commensurate with any direction staff also requests Council consider potential funding options as there is currently no budget allocation for this project.

A Frame Structural Conditions Report
Monday, November 10, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. Regular Meeting in the City Council Chambers 6 Agenda Item: 11.A
Date of Meeting: October 27, 2025
Department: Administration
To: City Council
From: Robin Picken
Subject: PRESENTATION - Retirement of City of Bishop Police Captain Joshua Ellsworth
Prepared On: October 23, 2025

STAFF REPORT
Background/History:

Josh Ellsworth started serving the City of Bishop as the Bishop Police Lieutenant on April 4, 2016 and only recently his title was changed to Bishop Police Captain. Josh Ellsworth retired from the City of Bishop effective October 3, 2025. It is appropriate that he be honored for his nine and a half years of service to the City.

Analysis/Discussion:

None.

Economic Impacts:

None.

Budget Impacts:

None.

Legal Review:

None.

Recommended Action:

Council will make presentations to Joshua "Josh" Ellsworth to honor his years of public service with the City of Bishop.

Approved By: Pam Foster 10/23/2025
Approved By:

Approved By:

Approved By:
7 2
024-25BTID
ANNUAL
REPORT
8 1 - COVER
2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS
3 - MEET THE TEAM
4 - BTID BACKGROUND
5 - ADVISORY BODY
6 - BUDGET PHILOSOPHY
7-9 - BUDGET KEY OBJECTIVES
10 - LODGING: OCCUPANCY AND ADR
11 - MOMENTUM
12 - STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
13 - 10-YEAR LOOK BACK (2014-2023/24 + 2024/25)
14 - NEW PROGRAMS: ALWAYS EXPANDING
15 - GOAL: INCREASE MAJOR MEDIA ADVERTISING
16 - CONNECTIONS
17 - GOAL: DEVELOP A STRATEGIC DIGITAL CAMPAIGN
18 - GOAL: IMPROVE WEBSITE AND DIGITAL FOOTPRINT
19 - LODGING GOAL: BOOK DIRECT BENEFIT
20 - GOAL: STRATEGICALLY TARGET DIVERSE AUDIENCES
21 - GOAL: REACHING A VARIETY OF DEMOGRAPHICS
22 - COLLABORATION
23 - ENGAGE TRAVEL TRADE AND MEDIA FOR FAM TRIPS
24 - EXPANDED REACH: INTERNATIONAL VISITORS / IPW RECAP 25 - EXPANDED REACH: ENHANCE EVENTS AND ATTENDANCE
26 - EXPANDED REACH: BISHOP CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
27 - EXPANDED REACH: INYO COUNTY PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS
28 - GOAL: PROVIDE EXCELLENT PERSONAL SERVICE
29 - TRAVEL TRENDS: VISIT CALIFORNIA, LOOKING FORWARD
30 - LOOKING FORWARD
31 - BUDGET REVIEW 2024-2025
32 - BACK COVER

CONTENTS
9 Joe Pollini
Host Supervisor
2011
Host Supervisor
2011
April Kress
Membership & Events
2002
Membership & Events
2002
Joyce Walker Guest Host
2019
New Person
Operations Mgr.
2025?
Operations Mgr.
2025?
Lynn Cooper
Bookkeeper (PT)
2024
Bookkeeper (PT)
2024
Tawni Thomson
Anna Willey Jennifer Renaldi
Executive Director
2006
Guest Host
2022
Guest Host
2022
*Note: Executive Director also oversees a team of digital marketing contractors.

JULIE FABER
BETSY FORSYTH // WIL DANIELS // GIGI DEJONG // LOCAL FRESHIES AND OTHERS.

MEETTHETEAM
10 For many years, Bishop business owners urged the Chamber of Commerce and City of Bishop to enhance marketing efforts for our destination. However, the City’s general fund budget could not support the cost of a comprehensive marketing program. In response, the Chamber began discussions with local lodging owners in 2012 to explore a selfsustaining funding solution that would not place any strain on the City’s budget.

The result was the creation of the Bishop Tourism Improvement District (BTID). The District Management Plan was carefully developed with input from all assessed businesses and the City of Bishop Administration.

Since its implementation, the BTID has exceeded expectations—boosting room sales by increasing both occupancy and length of stay. This growth has, in turn, significantly increased the City’s collection of vital transient occupancy tax revenues.

The Bishop Tourism Improvement District (BTID) is an assessment district designed to provide specific benefits to payors by funding marketing and sales promotion efforts for assessed businesses. The BTID was initially formed in 2014 for a five (5) year term, beginning January 1, 2015. The district was renewed for a 10-year term, January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2029.

The district includes all lodging businesses within the boundaries of the Bishop City limits, including hotels, motels, hostels, and short-term rentals. Assessment rate is currently 2% of gross sales and is collected by the City of Bishop at the same time and in the same manner as Transient Occupancy Tax. BTID funds are then forwarded to the Bishop Chamber on a quarterly basis. BTID funds are used for tourism promotion programs as outlined in the BTID Management District Plan. No proposed changes to boundary, rate, or business classifications are proposed for this year.

In California, TIDs are formed pursuant to the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994. This law allows for the creation of a benefit assessment district to raise funds within a specific geographic area. The key difference between TIDs and other benefit assessment districts is that funds raised are returned to the private non-profit corporation governing the district.

The strategic marketing plan funded by the BTID represents a significantly broader and more impactful effort than any single stakeholder could undertake alone. Last year, the BTID generated $630,000 in revenue—an impressive figure at first glance. However, when compared to the marketing budgets of competing destinations, our resources remain relatively modest. Despite this, we continue to make strategic, high-impact investments that maximize every dollar to benefit the Bishop community and local economy

BACKGROUND

BISHOPTOURISM IMPROVEMENTDISTRICT(BTID)
11 The Bishop Chamber of Commerce will continue to serve as the BTID’s Owners’ Association. The Owners’ Association is charged with managing funds and implementing programs in accordance with this plan, and must provide annual reports to the Bishop City Council. *A minimum of three Bishop Chamber Board members represent lodging businesses paying the BTID assessment.
2024-25 Tourism Business Improvement District Board
Name Business Representation Title
Robert Sharp Eastern Sierra Community Bank President
Sarah Freundt Grocery Outlet Vice President
Cheryl Underhill Northern Inyo Hospital Foundation, VFW, Lions, Altrusa, Eastern Sierra Cancer Alliance, Elks
Treasurer
Sunil Lad * Best Western Bishop Lodge & Comfort Inn
Immediate Past
President
Luis Barrantes* Vagabond Inn Board Member
John Marko Individual Member Board Member
Tara Frank Owens Valley Paiute-Shoshone Cultural Center Board Member Donna Bird Mule Days Celebration Board Member
Jason Brown Laughing Parrot Productions Board Member
Jennifer Morrow Elevated Bishop Board Member
Lisa Coedy * Wayfinder Bishop Board Member
Gary Gunsolley Bishop Flyfishing Guide Service Board Member Dustin DelGiudice Looney Bean Bishop Board Member
Debi Yerkes Alex Printing Board Member

ADVISORYBODY
The all volunteer board meets monthly on the 2 Wednesday of every month. The Bishop Chamber Executive Director presents public updates at Bishop City Council meetings every month.
nd
12 The Bishop Tourism Improvement District (BTID) Management Plan, developed by Bishop Hoteliers prescribes:
80% of funds for sales and marketing;
10% for administration;
5% for visitor services/enhancements; and
5% for contingency/reserve.
+ Seek support from City of Bishop, County of Inyo, Community and Regional Collaboration. + Engage volunteers to minimize staff expense and enhance projects/events.

BTIDKEYOBJECTIVES

BUDGETPHILOSOPHY
Sales and Marketing Programs may include:

Year-Round Visitor Information Center in downtown Bishop operated by professionally trained staff; Membership with local, state, and national tourism organizations, such as Visit California, High Sierra Visitors Council, and Brand USA to target key international markets to increase overnight visitation; Production or sponsorship of events that draw overnight visitors, particularly in the off-seasons; Signage along Highway 395 to promote responsible recreation, flights and events; Attendance of travel consumer shows to promote overnight visitation; Participation in educational and networking conferences, such as VisitCA, Caltravel, IPW, and DMA West.

Online marketing, including a website with mobile and foreign language versions, search engine marketing, paid social media ads, and banner ads promoting Bishop as a year-round destination; Engage professional companies such as Smith Travel Research (STR), VisaVue, Datafy, and others to conduct research that will help guide marketing efforts and effectively remarket to increase overnight visitation;
Print and digital advertising to promote overnight visitation to Bishop; Development and implementation of a public relations and communications strategy, inclusive of social media outlets and press release distribution, designed to increase overnight visitation at assessed businesses;
Sales and marketing blitzes for assessed businesses;
Familiarization tours of assessed businesses; and
Preparation, distribution, and production of collateral promotional materials such as brochures, flyers, and maps to promote overnight visitation.

Visitor Services/Enhancements may include:

Comprehensive and integrated wayfinding signage;
Visitor education through projects such as Climbing Ranger; Visitor Center improvements and enhancements; and
Trout stocking in Bishop Area waters to promote overnight visitation. 13 As defined within the plan, the BTID continues to focus on:

Promote Bishop as a year-round vacation destination
Focus marketing efforts on midweek and slower months of November through May Strategically target diverse audiences
Increase brand awareness
Engage travel trade and media for familiarization trips Provide excellent customer service to all guests
Increase major media advertising
Improve website and digital footprint
Develop a strategic social media and online advertising campaign Partner with event organizers to enhance events and increase attendance Each of these strategic imperatives includes specific objectives and initiatives that the BTID Board is committed to achieving over the life of the plan.

BTIDKEYOBJECTIVES:THESTRATEGY
WINNING!
The Bishop Tourism Improvement District has proven to be a “win-win-win” program. New marketing initiatives have led to higher occupancy, a “win” for the lodging partners. Higher occupancy increases TOT, a “win” for the City’s general fund. Higher room sales also generate additional BTID funds, a “win” for BACCVB’s marketing budget, allowing increased investments to properly promote Bishop.

INFORMEDINVESTMENTS
We closely monitor travel data and trends using:

Google Analytics
Datafy Visitor Data
Social Media Insights
Smith Travel Research
Visitor Guide Requests
Bishop Widget & ChamberMaster Stats
Email Marketing Campaigns
Visit California/CalTravel/Brand USA
Expedia /TripAdvisor/Industry Experts
14 The City of Bishop’s two main sources of revenue, sales tax and transient occupancy tax, are dependent upon a successful tourism marketing effort.

In FY 2013-2014, the year prior to BTID’s inception, the City collected $2.1 Million in transient occupancy.

The City’s Independent Auditor noted “Because the tourism industry and related sales taxes account for a significant portion of the City’s general fund revenues, a downturn in tourism could result in a substantial reduction in general fund revenues and the City may not have sufficient resources to pay all of it’s general fund obligations.” (Note 15, page 37, 2014 Audited Financial Report)
In FY 2024-2025, the City of Bishop collected over $3.7 Million in transient occupancy tax - nearly 30% of total general fund revenue and notably about 76% higher than prior to BTID.

This incredible contribution of TOT revenue to the City’s General Fund is one of the direct benefits of tourism for the City, as the full collection of TOT revenue is retained by the City and used at its discretion.

Separately, the BTID retains the revenue collected through its special assessment of 2%, which in FY 24-25 generated $631,082.
2014-2024:TENYEARSOFBTIDBENEFIT
15 FOCUS MARKETINGEFFORTSON MIDWEEKANDSLOWER

MONTHSOFNOVEMBERTHROUGH MAY
2014-15 2024-25

JUN JUL AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 BISHOP LODGING PERFORMANCE
Average Daily Rate (ADR) is another carefully
monitored metric. Lodging rates vary in all
communities according to demand, with higher
rates during peak travel season and major
events. Increasing ADR is a good indicator that
BTID funded marketing programs are working to
increase Bishop’s status as a desirable
destination.

We are especially pleased to see increased ADR
in the off-peak times, most significant growth
was in October and January, adding 19% for
these two months, and 15% to November!
The goal is to smooth out the seasonality
of our tourism-based economy, positively
impacting business, tax revenues and
employment opportunities.
16 IPW
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
JAN 35.5 42.1 50.2 43.2 58.3 54.9 48.4 61 62.6 54.2 54.1 FEB 53.7 42.3 52 54.2 63.2 57.3 53.4 68.5 67.6 58 61.4
MAR 53.7 57 59.4 61.1 65.8 47.2 61.5 66.6 70.7 65.2 62.5 APR 55.9 52.6 60.4 57.6 65.8 27.1 65.4 65.3 69.4 65.6 63.6 MAY 61 63 64.6 69.8 68.6 38.3 70.2 68.5 68.8 65.7 68.5
JUN 74.6 81.5 81.2 81 81.7 66.2 86.1 82.1 79.4 78.8 81.8 JUL 81.5 84.4 86.9 86.3 84.8 71 82.9 79 76.9 80.2 82.8
AUG 74.5 81.1 84.9 78.8 86.7 69.3 66.9 78.5 77.2 80.6 82.7 SEP 75.4 85.1 85.1 83.6 88.6 62.8 66.8 76.1 79 78.2
OCT 64.6 77.9 85.6 81.6 86 73.8 78.1 82.1 84 83.6
NOV 43.4 52.8 54.4 56.5 57.5 59.4 61.5 63.9 59.4 57.9
DEC 46.1 46.9 47.8 52.3 54.1 44.8 61.8 57 47.9 51
AVG 60 63.9 67.7 67.2 71.8 56 66.9 70.7 70.2 68.3

LODGINGOCCUPANCY

AVERAGEDAILYRATE ADR

AVERAGE DAILY RATE YTD
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
$94 $100 $106 $108 $114 $110 $120 $127 $135 $141 $146
17 MOMENTUM STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

PROMOTEBISHOPASAYEAR-ROUNDVACATIONDESTINATION
18 STRATEGICPLANIMPLEMENTATION & APPROACH

IMPLEMENTATION & PROGRAM APPROACH
Our strategic plan is built on a solid digital communications infrastructure. We partner with industry expert TwoSix for paid social media and search engine management. The new improved website, www.bishopvisitor.com, is a dynamic tool that is continuously updated to provide valuable content. This online framework allows us to track performance, adapt content for seasons and events, and make real-time micro-adjustments, ensuring we remain nimble and responsive to the evolving market.

AUTHENTICITY
We believe authenticity is key. Our content is created by a team of local experts who share their genuine passion and LOVE for the Bishop area. This team of writers, photographers, videographers, and social media specialists provides a local voice that an ad agency cannot replicate. We invest in a variety of online marketing programs to promote these firsthand experiences across platforms like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, TripAdvisor, and Expedia.

SUSTAINABILITY
Our mission is to inspire travel that fosters community togetherness and economic development while preserving our unique landscape. We strive to strengthen our image and encourage responsibility from both residents and guests. A key part of this commitment is our partnership with Sierra Forever, which help fund two Climbing Rangers to educate guests and patrol the lands, ensuring the health of our landscape and community remains paramount.

INFORMED INVESTMENTS FOR SUSTAINABILITY AND GROWTH
Our marketing decisions are guided by data. We use Datafy monthly to analyze guest demographics, spending habits, and location data, allowing us to make informed investment decisions for sustainability and growth. We complement our digital efforts with a mix of regional and national publications, both in print and online, and produce our own visitor guides and maps, such as the Bishop Visitor Guide and Fall Colors Guide.

INFORMATION CENTER
The Bishop Information Center is a crucial hub for our operations. Our professional Guest Hosts provide courteous, knowledgeable, and prompt service to every inquiry, whether by call, email, or in-person walk-in. The past two years, we expanded our reach beyond the main center, greeting and surveying guests directly at the Bishop Airport to better understand their needs and provide a welcoming first point of contact. 19 2014 2023-24 2024-25 REACH
WEBSITE - VISITORS 16K 681K 734K 734K
Event Counts 2.2M 2.3M
External Links (Members) 107K 112K
FACEBOOK 0 62K 70K 23.3M
INSTAGRAM 0 38K 43K 3M
TIKTOK 0 4.9K 5.3K 556K
YOUTUBE (HOURS/WATCH TIME) 0 227K 341K 341K
DATAFY ATTRIBUTABLE TRIPS 0 0 3765 1.5M
VISITOR GUIDE DOWNLOAD/PRINT 10K 65K 67K 67K
PRINT/DIGITAL MAGAZINE REACH 635K 15M 15M 15M
EMAIL NEWSLETTER SUBSCRIBERS 1948 46K 51K
BISHOP VISITOR GUIDE FLIPBOOK 0 1413 2794 4K
QR CODES - ALL HOTEL MIRRORS 0 1091 2372 3K
PAID SEARCH - CLICKS 4413 29,828 37,738 353K
PAID SOCIAL - CLICKS 0 144K 176K 2.3M
EMAIL LEADS / FB & INSTAGRAM 239 2500 4598 4.5K
VISITOR CENTER 20K 19K 16K 16K
Look at the growth over the past 10 years, since the inception of the BTID.

Reaching over 47 Million Guests and Engaging with 479K Guests online and in person. 10-YEARLOOKBACK(2014-2024)
20 2014 2023-24 2024-25
UGC/Crowdriff #Engagements N/A 48K 64K
Book Direct #Referrals N/A 2483 5477
Visit Widget #Engagements N/A 57K 76K
StoryMaps #Engagements N/A 9.7K 12K
Yosemite Journal Campaign #Leads N/A 10K 16.5K
California Fall Color Website N/A 94K 120K
Visit USA Parks Campaign #Impressions N/A 140K 151K
Dog Trekker Campaign #Impressions N/A N/A 400K
Musings from a Trout Bum N/A N/A 6.5K
Visit CA Creators #Videos N/A N/A 14
Travel Trade # Shows 2 7 7
Climbing Ranger # Connections N/A 2,004 2450
Trout Stocking CDFW 6 6
Program expansion shows growth in all directions. It’s not all about the stand-alone website, it’s about all the touchpoints that support the guest in every aspect of their journey.

NEW PROGRAMS
21 IPW
2024/2025
California Visitors Guide
California Road Trips Magazine
Adventure Sports Journal
Fish Taco Chronicles
Western Outdoor News
Yosemite Journal
Scenic 395 Magazine
Daily Independent - Sierra Views/Prospector
Mule Days Program Ad
Mammoth In Room Directory
Eastern Sierra Fishing Guide
Climbing Magazine - Ascent
Living Bird Magazine
Ultra Running
S&S Off Road Magazine
Travel Guide To California
2014/2015
Scenic 395 Magazine
ES Fishing Guide
Yosemite Journal
Mono Co. Visitors Guide
Fish Taco Chronicles
Visit Bishop casts a wide marketing net to promote tourism, aiming to build broad brand awareness while also using targeted messaging to reach diverse domestic and international audiences. Some BTID funds have been invested in national and regional major media publications. Many of the publications are very niche-specific, targeting climbers, OHV users, bird watchers, trail runners, yoga enthusiasts or anglers. *NOTE: All print ads are accompanied with a digital ad/online version and or enews.

INCREASE MAJOR MEDIAADVERTISING
22 PUBLICRELATIONS/INFLUENCERS/BUDGETCOLLABORATIONS

CONNECTIONS

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS
photos by Nick Cote - Visit USA Parks Photographer
23 78%

ENGAGEMENT

THINGS TO DO
174K

BEST HIKE

IMPRESSIONS
127%
CTR 10.6%

ABOVE INDUSTRY AVG
5K

SOCIAL LEAD

GENERATION
10%
SOCIAL

ENGAGEMENT
80K

PAID SOCIAL
CLICKS 3.37% CTR
37%

ORGANIC SOCIAL

FOLLOWERS
12%

ORGANIC SOCIAL

ENGAGEMENT
430

ORGANIC SOCIAL
POSTS
Share your Bishop moments: #visitBishop and your photos might be featured! R
E
M
I
N
D
E
R
:

C
O
L
L
A
B
O
R
A
T
E
W
I
T
H
@
V
I
S
I
T
B
I
S
H
O
P

STRATEGICSOCIAL MEDIA & ADVERTISINGCAMPAIGN
Our social media performance metrics are robust, with @VisitBishop's Facebook reach exceeding 23M and Instagram at 3M. We’re leaning into multi-photo formats. Targeted ad campaigns on Facebook, Instagram, and Google in key out-of-state markets like San Francisco and Denver generated over 5,000 leads (doubling last year!) and reaching nearly 400K new visitors.

Our video content has also seen significant growth, with YouTube views skyrocketing to 341K driven in part by integrating TikTok videos into YouTube Shorts to expand our audience. Summer lodging retargeting drove 95K impressions and 4,100 clicks. Lodging ads have been a success, increasing YoY traffic to the lodging page by over 400%! Paid social had

NEW LAUNCHOCTOBER2024:HIGHLIGHTS
25 BOOKDIRECTBENEFIT
The BookDirect initiative, a zero-commission booking engine integrated into the Bishop Visitor website, has demonstrated significant growth and continued value for local hoteliers.

Instead of paying expensive 3 party booking fees to companies like Expedia or Booking.com, this platform provides a direct booking channel that bypasses third-party commissions, resulting in a measurable increase in both referral volume and average booking value.
rd

KEYPERFORMANCE METRICS
Referrals & Bookings:

Last Year: 2,483 referrals
This Year: 5,477 referrals (a 121% increase)
Average Booking Value:

Last Year: $254 per booking
This Year: $315 per booking (a 24% increase)
Booking Lead Time:

Data indicates a consistent booking lead time of 42 days, suggesting that travelers are planning their visits well in advance.

New AdAgencyboostedour Lodgingpageby416%.
26 STRATEGICALLYTARGETDIVERSEAUDIENCES
An amazing 400,000+ high‑impact impressions/pageviews
4,000+ clicks/engagements—record totals for any city in their first campaign Featured‑destination upgrades, takeover newsletter, PawPress blogs, social posts, and ads that kept Bishop in pet parents throughout the entire campaign Custom sustainability messaging woven through stories, banners and social, reinforcing Leave OnlyPawPrints® values.

Audience insight: two‑thirds female, 25‑54; top login cities were LosAngeles, SanDiego, SanFrancisco, and Sacramento; exactly the drive‑markets you are interested in targeting The campaign delivered more than $25,000 in value and put Bishop content into the new DogTrekker Media Network, multiplying reach across curated dog‑travel and outdoor sites

DOGTREKKER
Website received 94,000 visitors - up 34%
Bishop homepage ad received 283 clicks
Inyo County/Bishop mentioned in 5 coordinated news stories with more than 82 million impressions/ $200,000 value
Weekly media newsletter had an open rate of more than 56% to approximately 400 members of the media
CALIFORNIAFALLCOLOR.COM
Winter/Spring 2025 Campaign
75% international - 25% domestic markets
151K Impressions

35.6% Engagement Rate
5,294 Link Clicks

VISITUSAPARKS
Collaborating with Ambassador Nick Cote through
the Herrmann Global/Visit USA Parks partnership
allowed us to acquire high-value visual photos and
great storytelling for the Bishop area. Content
theme: “Sunny Winter Escape in Bishop, CA.” Given
our limited international marketing budget, this
initiative strategically leveraged these assets and
translated itineraries to reach niche audiences in
Germany, France, and the UK. This approach not
only provides us with stunning photography but
also adds tangible value by driving engagement and
generating owned content for our off-peak season.
27 IN MARKET Visit Bishop APP Website Facebook/Instagram Book Direct Los Angeles Los Angeles Los Angeles Los Angeles Los Angeles San Diego San Diego San Jose Bishop Springville
Bakersfield Sacramento Sacramento Bakersfield Seattle
Reno Victorville San Diego San Diego Sonora
Sacramento San Jose San Francisco Ridgecrest Bakersfield San Francisco Las Vegas Las Vegas Reno Long Beach
Las Vegas San Francisco Seattle Las Vegas San Jose
Phoenix Anaheim Denver Riverside Phoenix
Seattle Reno Germany/India/France Mexico/UK/Canada Japan/Belgium

INTENTIONAL INVESTMENTS REACHINGAVARIETYOF DEMOGRAPHICS 75% AGE 35-55
65%< AGE 35
28 We are actively engaged with regional partners including City of Bishop, County of Inyo, High Sierra Visitors Council, Inyo Associates, Mono County, Mammoth Lakes Tourism, Tri-County Fairgrounds, LADWP, USFS, BLM, CalTrans, Sierra Forever, CA Dept. of Fish & Wildlife, Eastern Sierra Business Resource Center and other stakeholders.

We work collaboratively for the betterment of our community, and we actively participate in many projects.

We will continue to learn from industry experts such as Crowdriff, TwoSix, Expedia, TripAdvisor, Visit California, CalTravel, One West, US Travel Association and Brand USA. They provide vital information about domestic and global travel trends, forecasts and best practices that we can apply right here in our own backyard.

REGIONALCOLLABORATIONCREATESVITALPARTNERSHIPS

ALIGNED ADVOCACY/REGIONAL PARTNERSHIPS
29 ENGAGETRAVELTRADEAND MEDIAFORFAM TRIPS
Earned Media = Amplifying Bishop’s Reach Through Trusted Voices “Earned media” is a vital pillar of the Visit Bishop destination development strategy. While it's sometimes referred to as “free” advertising, that term can be misleading. Earned media refers to publicity that isn't paid for directly—such as articles, blog posts, or social media content—created by third parties like journalists, photographers, or influencers.

The Bishop Chamber recognizes the immense value of cultivating strong relationships with these content creators. We regularly organize familiarization tours (FAMs) to invite media professionals to explore our region firsthand. While we don’t script their stories, we provide support—often covering lodging and meals when requested—so they can authentically experience all that Bishop has to offer.

These efforts continue to deliver powerful results. This year alone, Bishop was featured on the cover of the Wall Street Journal App, with an additional spotlight in their travel section.

We also proudly hosted a Visit California-led SUPERFAM, bringing even more visibility to our destination through trusted, influential voices.

NEW! MEDIAROOM
https://bishopvisitor.com/media-room/
30 EASTERN
SIERRA
TOUR
Our collaboration with Mono and Inyo Counties at
IPW, the nation's premier travel marketplace, was
a resounding success. We leveraged this vital
platform to engage with over 5,000 international
buyers and media. By showcasing a branded
itinerary that features 10 iconic venues from Death
Valley to Yosemite, we generated significant
interest and secured meetings with over 40 key
tour operators and media from Europe, Mexico,
Canada, Brazil, Vietnam, and India.

J
U
N
E
2 0
2 5
IPW

BUZZWORTHY MOMENTS
Tour Operators: 8-14 night itineraries,
want details for itineraries (where to eat,
road stops, don’t miss along the way with
an emphasis on wellness/gentle outdoorsy.

Flights: Ready to book 12-18 months in
advance.

Freelance Travel Writers: AFAR, Fodor’s,
TIME, US News, San Francisco Chronicle,
National Geographic, Wall Street Journal
More Int’l Media: Mexico City, Italy,
France, Vietnam, Brazil
31 PARTNER WITHEVENTORGANIZERSTOENHANCE EVENTS
Several events draw thousands of participants to Bishop each year. BACCVB is proud of our work to support longstanding events and attract new ones. Our staff continues to keep in contact with organizers, offering marketing and planning support.

Event Promotion:

Events Page on www.bishopvisitor.com/events includes a list view of events and traditional calendar view.

The events list is continually updated, representing a significant contribution of staff time. A typical month has 35+ events on the web calendar.

Paid social and search campaigns drive traffic to the events page. Google ads campaign for events had 5K clicks and 196K impressions.

Event Development & Support: BACCVB hosts and supports a diverse range of events in our community. Some are for locals; some are for visitors and many are for both.

Bishop Chamber is lead organizer on some events (Blake Jones, Christmas, Media Reception). For other events, we provide varying types of support like marketing, volunteers, and equipment.

New Events: Host staff worked with the Tahoe Trampers, a Lake Tahoe senior hiking group to coordinate a group trip in September 2024. They brought in over 70 individuals to Bishop for hiking, nature appreciation, and local history. Bishop Chamber Executive Director has been working since 2019 with organizers of the US Highpointers Club for their event that will bring 180+ people from across the country to Bishop September 17-21, 2025.

Stay in the know: Discover local festivals, events and community resources on www.bishopvisitor.com.

Be a part of the action: Submit your own event for visitors and locals to enjoy! Christmas Parade/Tree Lighting
Railroad Express
Blake Jones Trout Derby
Trout Opener Media Reception
SWCIFF Trout Rodeo
CHSRA State Finals Rodeo
VCMC Dual Sport Rally
Pabanamanina Pow Wow
Flash Foxy Climbing Festival
California Hawking Club
4th in the Park
Eastern Sierra Tri-County Fair
Downtown Markets
Fall Colors Car Show
SAR Trail Races
Millpond Music Festival and More…
32 BISHOP

CHAMBEROFCOMMERCE
The Bishop Chamber of Commerce serves as the Owners’ Association for BTID, providing guidance, implementation and oversight of BTID funded programs.

The Chamber of Commerce brings added value to the partnership in many other ways:

Bishop Chamber of Commerce has more than 300 members.

Membership dues, donations and chamber event revenues support the overall effort to promote our destination.

Dozens of Chamber Volunteers provide hundreds of hours of service, thus reducing staff expense.

Chamber-Member Businesses donate thousands of dollars worth of merchandise and gift certificates for event prizes and other fundraising efforts.

Bishop Chamber hosts networking and educational events that uplift the entire business community.

Bishop Chamber brings other stakeholders and collaborators together to co-sponsor and enhance projects such as LADWP Responsible Recreation Ad Campaigns, Inyo County and City of Bishop Marketing Services Projects.
33 192K
Total Video/Audio
Completions
3,765

1.5 M
Total Trips
Impressions
For those served ads,
these are attributable
trips to Bishop

ATTRIBUTIONCAMPAIGN
EST. CAMPAIGN IMPACT
EST. ROAS
EST. SPEND PER DAY
$615,747.00
$41 :$1
$163.55

ULTRA-TARGETED

CAMPAIGN

AIRSERVICE
5 MONTH CAMPAIGN (Nov 24-Mar 25)

LOCAL FLIGHT DISCOUNTS
2023/24 - 622 CLICKS
2024/25 - 1030 CLICKS
EXPANDEDPROGRAMSTHROUGHPARTNERS: INYOCOUNTY

ATTRIBUTIONCAMPAIGN
Datafy is a data platform that works with the travel industry, helping destinations understand:

1.Who is coming?

2.Where are they coming from/ origin market?

3.How long are they staying?
They also create campaigns out in the real world, serving ads, then seeing who physically showed up! These are the results based on a hyper-granulated campaign.

Re-engage past visitors that have come to Bishop
Create an airport look-a-like campaign that mirrors the in-market behavioral patterns.

Create a lodging look-a-like campaign to expand reach.

ORGANICPOSTS
34 BOOTSONTHEGROUND

BISHOP VISITOR HOSTS

WEEKLY SEASONAL REPORTS

CLIMBING RANGER CONDITIONS REPORTS

FISHING REPORTS

FALL COLOR REPORTS

WILDFLOWER REPORTS
INTERNATIONAL SPORTSMEN’S EXPO, SACRAMENTO

BART HALL, LONG BEACH

TRAVEL & ADVENTURE SHOW, LOS ANGELES

PACIFIC COAST SPORTFISHING SHOW, OC

TRAVEL & ADVENTURE SHOW, BAY AREA

TRAVEL & ADVENTURE SHOW, DENVER

US TRAVEL ASSOCIATION IPW CONFERENCE, CHICAGO
Open year-round, hours vary by season.

One full-time and three part-time hosts provide outstanding service to guests and locals.

Well trained, professional, courteous, and knowledgeable.

Must handle a vast scope of inquiries in-person, by phone and email. 16,148 guests assisted in 2024
Busiest month is October - 2,443 guests
Next busiest months are June (1,888) and July (1,772)
Slowest months are January (552) and February (535)
INFORMATIONCENTER:BYTHENUMBERS
RECREATERESPONSIBLY:BISHOPCLIMBINGRANGERS
Established in the fall of 2019, the Climbing Ranger Program has played a critical role in addressing the impacts of overuse and irresponsible recreation in the Bishop area. This collaborative initiative brings together key partners, including the Bishop Area Climbers Coalition, U.S. Forest Service (USFS), Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Sierra Forever, and private foundations.

Climbing Rangers are on the front lines—providing educational outreach, conducting visitor surveys, sharing current climbing conditions, and leading stewardship efforts to protect and preserve climbing areas. Our organization proudly supports this program by contributing funding and helping amplify its message through strategic social media promotion.
35 Visit California, our key marketing partner, plays a vital role in driving demand for travel throughout the state by leveraging compelling content, robust research, and strategic networking initiatives. According to Visit California’s latest forecast, overall visitation to the state is expected to decline slightly in 2025 (-0.7%), largely due to a projected 9.2% drop in international travel.

This decrease is attributed to global economic pressures, including higher tariffs and negative sentiment toward the U.S. stemming from national trade policies.

Fortunately, Bishop is not currently experiencing the same downward trend. However, these statewide projections serve as a critical reminder: with fewer overall visitors expected, the work we do to attract and engage travelers—particularly domestic audiences—is more important than ever. Strategic, localized marketing efforts will be essential to maintaining momentum and ensuring continued economic vitality for our region.

TOURISM TRENDSUNDERSCORE IMPORTANCEOF LOCAL EFFORTS

INYOCOUNTY

INYOCOUNTY
36 Investing in the Future of Bishop Tourism...

Next year’s budget, along with long-term revenue projections, reflects more than just the continued support of the BTID through 2029 and beyond. It also represents the unwavering commitment of the City of Bishop and Inyo County to invest in the future of our region as a thriving tourism destination.

As we look ahead, it’s imperative that we remain sharply focused on our financial health. The City’s approach to fiscal responsibility emphasizes preparedness for unforeseen challenges while also prioritizing strategic investments that support economic development and community wellbeing. Tourism is a cornerstone of that strategy.

Looking back with a touch of nostalgia, one constant stands out: people LOVE Bishop—especially for its friendliness. This feeling is rooted in authentic visitor experiences all across town, many of which begin at the Visitor Center. To maintain our welcoming, small-town Main Street atmosphere, a fully staffed Visitor Center remains a key component of our 10-year forwardlooking strategy.

Every day, staff at the Visitor Center look guests in the eye, walk them through a map, share local stories, and encourage them to stay another night—or three. This kind of personalized, genuine interaction simply can’t be replicated by a digital kiosk. While technology has its place, it can’t replace the human connection that makes Bishop stand out. Without a personal touch, visitors are more likely to scan a code and move on to the next town.

We are committed to building on this momentum through strong partnerships and regional collaboration. Our vision for Bishop is rooted in community-based tourism, tied to local traditions and powered by an open invitation that continues to set us apart from other destinations.

Thank you for trusting us with this important work.
10YEARLOOKFORWARD
37 38
39 40
41 42
Bishop Police Department
September 2025 End of Month Report

JAN FEB MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC
TOTAL INCIDENTS 1130 1137 1317 1190 1269 1140 1257 1049 1119 CALLS FOR SERVICE 531 586 814 732 788 719 717 585 652
OFFICER INITIATED INCIDENTS 599 551 503 458 481 421 540 464 467

TRAFFIC
STOPS
71 68 53 45 41 43 65 29 50

OTHER OIA
INC.
528 483 450 413 440 378 475 435 417
BUS/BUILDING CHECKS 12 9 4 0 3 4 2 5 4
VEH/PED CHECKS 48 48 34 41 48 34 47 47 54
TOTAL OFFICER REPORTS 94 75 96 92 110 70 79 78 96
ACCIDENT 6 4 3 4 4 6 4 5 7
CRIMINAL ACCIDENT 1 0 1 4 3 3 3 1 2
FELONY 12 12 21 12 16 14 12 16 13
INFORMATION 32 24 35 22 34 18 27 24 25
INFRACTION 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MISDEMEANOR 43 34 36 50 53 29 33 25 49
TC WITH INJURIES 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 1
TC NO INJURIES 6 3 4 7 6 7 6 5 8

TOTAL MISDEMEANOR & FELONY

ARRESTS
28 28 28 44 35 16 24 21 32
MISDEMEANOR ARRESTS 22 23 16 33 27 10 22 16 28
ADULT 18 20 16 31 23 10 22 16 26
JUVENILE 4 3 0 2 4 0 0 0 2
FELONY ARRESTS 6 5 12 11 8 6 2 5 4
ADULT 6 5 12 10 8 5 2 5 3

JUVENILE 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1
CITATIONS 68 60 65 75 70 35 84 40 53
MOVING 15 15 11 11 7 7 19 8 7
NON-MOVING 29 22 35 24 27 12 46 18 24
CRIMINAL 24 23 19 40 36 16 19 14 22

CAMPING ORDINANCE CONTACTS
CAMPING ORDINANCE CITATIONS 2 0 0 2 1 0 5 2 1
43 JAN FEB MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC

DISPATCH PHONE

ACTIVITY
911 CALLS 185 184 203 201 256 212 234
INBOUND 181 173 197 198 241 200 228
ABANDONED 4 11 6 3 15 12 6
ADMINISTRATIVE CALLS 931 949 1228 1100 1156 1229 1230
INBOUND 857 610 838 762 761 844 826
OUTBOUND 336 337 389 334 381 385 403
ABANDONED 8 2 1 4 14 0 1

44 Small Town with a
Big Backyard!

CITY OF BISHOP
377 West Line Street - Bishop, California 93514
Post Office Box 1236 - Bishop, California 93515
760-873-8458 [email protected]
www.cityofbishop.com
September 2025 Page 1 of 2
Public Works Report
September 2025
Water

1. Water consumption for the month was down 8% compared to September 2013.

Total ground water produced was 50,859,689 gallons.

2. Took monthly bacteria samples.

3. Checked static water levels at Wells #2 and #4.

4. Continued to work with Wood Rodgers on the design for the W. Line water main replacement project, associated Preliminary Engineering Report, and new City Standards.

5. Repaired break in 8” steel line, near 462 West Line Street. This is the fourth patch in this 30 foot section of main line.

6. Removed 8” valve at Elm and Main (MAWE-N) and capped cross, capped 8” valve at Wayfinder and Main (MACS-W) abandoned that section of old water main.

7. Submit all monthly/quarterly reporting to the SWRCB.

8. Started researching and meeting with product representatives for different brands of water meters. Met with HydroPro solutions to learn about Master Meter and Ferguson to learn about Neptune meters. Signed up to participate in a pilot program to test Master Meter and their software.

9. Conducted water meter readings.

10.Conducted PFAS sampling at Well #2 & #4.

11.Replaced two water services on Main Street that were damaged during construction.

12.Verified 80% of water service sizes on West Line Street for line replacement other 20% will be potholed.

13.Sent out an RFP to consultant services for the development of a cross connection control program and specialist services in order to meet the new requirements of the California Cross Control Policy Handbook.

Sewer

1. Periodically check the diversion manhole for obstructions.

2. Continued to serve as the Administrator for the Bishop Area Wastewater Authority.

3. Pulled sludge from digesters at the WWTP.
45 Small Town with a
Big Backyard!

CITY OF BISHOP
377 West Line Street - Bishop, California 93514
Post Office Box 1236 - Bishop, California 93515
760-873-8458 [email protected]
www.cityofbishop.com
September 2025 Page 2 of 2

4. Continue mowing at 40 acres, as a control measure for Whitetop and Xanthium (cocklebur).

5. Clean problem sewer mains and continue with systematic cleaning of sewer system within the city.

6. Work on 5-year sewer main maintenance cleaning of all main sewer lines.

7. Videoing of sewer mains.

8. Attend bi-monthly coordination meeting with ESCSD to discuss and collaborate ongoing operations.

9. Data collecting and logging to strengthen FOG system.

10.Educated a local business on FOG, gained traction with compliance.

11.Met with Lumos and West Yost to tour the wastewater treatment plants.

Streets

1. Routinely checked the Sierra Bike Path for trash and debris.

2. Patched potholes on city streets.

3. Issued multiple encroachment permits and inspect work site before, during, and after work activities to ensure compliance with standards.

4. Trim trees along City Streets.

5. Street sweeping.

6. Attended construction meetings with Caltrans to stay informed and provide support for their Bishop Pavements Project.

Miscellaneous

1. Provide weekly safety meetings for PW crew.

2. Participate in weekly coordination meetings.

3. Marked City utilities for Dig Alert tickets.

4. Performed routine maintenance on Public Works fleet.

5. Continued working on water and sewer rate study project with L&T consultants.

6. Provided traffic control devices for the Friday Night Market on Academy Street.

7. Met with DWP representatives to discuss options for their future sidewalk and drainage improvements along the south side of Mandich Street. 46 Small Town with a
Big Backyard!

CITY OF BISHOP
377 West Line Street - Bishop, California 93514
Post Office Box 1236 - Bishop, California 93515
760-873-8458
www.cityofbishop.com
Community Services Report
September 2025
Programs

1. After School Stay and Play program is operating at the Elm Street School, Monday through Friday The Stay and Play program is full, with a waiting list. Staff and Participants will be working on fall crafts. Field trips planned are High School Sports and Gymnastics at the City Auditorium. Hired two new Activity Leaders as staff members.

2. The Bishop Park Pool is closed for the 2025 season. Preparations for winterization and season wrap up are being done. Aquatics Coordinator will be conducting staff and operational evaluations. Planning has begun for 2026 season with preparations for Jr. Lifeguard program.

3. Summer camps 2025 are wrapped up for the year and will begin registration in the spring of 2026.

4. Gymnastics Fall registration is open and will start in session September 27th. Winter Gymnastics Sessions are in the planning phase.

5. Senior Yoga class continues to be successful. Hosted at the City Auditorium on Mondays and Wednesdays at 10am.

6. Adult Coed Soccer has 8 teams, and the season is halfway through the regular season. Playoff will be in October starting on the 17th.

7. Adult Fitness with Ashley McLaughlin is in preparation for winter sessions.

Parks and Facilities
47 1. AYSO Soccer Fall, USA Soccer, and City of Bishop Adult has 13 fields at the City Park. Marking and upkeep of Soccer lines. This allows for multiple age groups and organizations to utilize the City Park.

2. Park staff has started work on Field 1 and Field 2 parking lot planters. This project will include wood planters around the tree wells and removal of existing railroad ties.

3. Pool maintenance occurs daily. Mondays the pool is closed for cleaning our pumps, filters, and deep cleaning.

4. Hosted the Labor Day Art in the Park from Inyo County Arts Council.

5. Hosted the Fall Colors Car Show on October 4th.

6. Removal of flower baskets on Main Street and Waren Street. Checked all irrigation for fall operation.

7. Park Staff and Pool Staff worked together to complete winterization of the Park Pool.

This includes draining and cleaning of the pool house, installation of the winter covers, and removal of all interior handrails and swim blocks.

8. Pool Pump Room electrical panel emergency repair, this is necessary for pool circulation. Scheduled power outage for October 23rd.

9. Clean up and irrigation repairs to landscaping on Warren street, City Hall, and Main streets.

10.Seasonal cleaning of flower beds on Main Street and Bishop Chamber.

11.Seasonal routine maintenance of all mowing and landscape equipment.

12.Daily routine of trash and cleaning of restrooms.

13.Cleaned debris from the creek, pond, and fountain.

14. Use of blower on Main Street Mondays and Fridays.

15.Seasonal adjustments are made to all City irrigation and City Park. As we move into Fall, Irrigation systems will be Audited for function and set for operation.

16.Spring tree trimming at the City Park is ongoing. Park staff continues to perform safety trimming.

17.Repairs of the Park Lift including a new hydraulic pump.

18.Repairs made to Front Restrooms and Talmage Park doors due to vandalism.

19.Preparations for Labor Day Art in the Park.
48 20.Mowing and cleaning of Field 6/Community Garden Area in preparation for Labor Day.

21.Seasonal staff reduction.

Sunrise

1. Daily routine of trash, debris, and inspections.

2. Leaf clean up at all common areas and residents.

3. Collected rents and payments for utilities.

4. Weekly routine maintenance of all lawns, landscapes, and common areas.

5. Began planning process of street and sidewalk replacement. Consultant has begun to design. Design is complete. We are seeking funding to complete this project.

6. Removal of Elm and Cottonwood trees in all fence lines.

7. The use of Organic Cat-Mase to mitigate feral cats.

8. Currently seeking a part time Staff member to fill a vacant position for maintenance.

9. Irrigation is now on. Staff has installed all water timers and checked for function.

10.Installed Astro-Turf Lawn on unit 23.

11.Hired new part time staff member.

Budget/Administrative

1. Held weekly staff meetings Tuesdays and Wednesdays.

2. Attended by-weekly City Council meetings.

3. Attended weekly Department Head Meetings.
49 4. Meet with First Choice Solutions and other Community Integrations to discuss integration of special needs participants in Summer Camps.

5. Organized all Youth Sports Organizations on the use of Sportsites for schedules and games.

6. The Parks and Recreation Commission meeting in September was cancelled. A special meeting will be held on November 19th at 6pm.

7. Conducted interviews and hired new part-time staff for the Stay and Play program.

8. Communication with Bishop Area Bike Organization for the possible relocation of a portion of the Skills track to accommodate the Field 6 Enhancement Project. Phase one Pump Track is complete, and the group has begun work on the Skills Track.

Communication is ongoing.

9. California Urban Greening Grant has been awarded to the City of Bishop, coordination with the Friends of the Eastern Sierra Community Gardens. Work with selected contractor Clair Concrete Inc. has begun for the Community Garden Enhancement Project. The contractor has ongoing work on concrete paths, pergola, and irrigation. Construction is complete and we continue to work with the Community Gardeners to make purchases.

10.Scheduling of outside events and parties hosted at the Bishop City Park facilities.

11.Work with Public Works on the Downtown corridor for landscapes, trash receptacles, and benches for the Caltrans Bishop Pavements Project.

12.Field 6 design work continues with Wood Rodgers. Updates will come as we look at design options for this project.

Highlights

1. The City Park Pool closed for the Season. Winterization by Park and Pool staff.

2. Parks staff is focused on Fall Events including the Labor Day Art in the Park, Fall Colors Car Show, Cancer Walk, and BUHS Pickleball Tournament.

3. Working with the Community Gardeners on the Urban Greenig Grant Enhancement Project including communication with CNRA for grant administration. Pak staff has begun planting trees along the Pine to Park Path.
50 4. Wrapping up the Fall Season with AYSO and Adult Coed Soccer.

5. Planning for Tennis/Pickleball Court resurfacing. Contacted Omnia purchasing for preferred vendors.

6. Working on Field 6 design and steps to move forward with the Field 6 Enhancement Project. Plans to present designs and alternatives to the Parks and Recreation Commission on November 19 at 6pm.
51 Small Town with a
Big Backyard!

CITY OF BISHOP
377 West Line Street - Bishop, California 93514
Post Office Box 1236 - Bishop, California 93515
760-873-8458 [email protected]
www.cityofbishop.com

Page 1 of 2 ends

Planning Department Report
September 2025

1. LAWP Training Facility and Construction Yard (Wye Road) • Facilitated project kickoff for the rezoning and General Plan Amendment application, including preparation of the CEQA Initial Study.

2. Eastern Sierra Housing Needs Study
• Housing Needs Study presentations scheduled for:
o Mono County – November 4
o Mammoth – November 5
o Bishop – November 10
o Inyo County – November 18

3. OpenGov Permitting Platform
• Continued implementation of the online permitting system for Planning and Building Department applications.

4. Parking and Land Use Study
• Closed the public survey period and began analysis with the consultant. • Total responses: 236 (August 4–September 8, 2025), with 213 from City of Bishop residents.

5. Ordinance Updates
• Drafted updates to the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance per State requirements.
• Developed Specific Plan Overlay Ordinance to codify Specific Plan policies into the Municipal Code.
• Advanced work on the Design Review Ordinance.

6. Bishop Inn Hotel
• Continued project review; construction anticipated to begin within the next two months.

7. Grant Management
• Progressed on CDBG CV1-0083 grant closeout for Fire Department PPE storage.
52 Small Town with a
Big Backyard!

CITY OF BISHOP
377 West Line Street - Bishop, California 93514
Post Office Box 1236 - Bishop, California 93515
760-873-8458 [email protected]
www.cityofbishop.com

Page 2 of 2 ends

8. Regional Coordination
• Attended Sierra Industry Shindig – All-Industry Working Group; received updates on Catalyst-funded project implementation and CSEDD/ESCOG core focus areas.

9. Community Economic Development Workshops
• Participated in Session #1.

10.Planning Commission Training
• Conducted training session with City Attorney Russell Hilderbrand.

11.Athletic Field 6 Improvements
• Collaborated with City staff to define next steps for the Field 6 improvement project.
53 54
55 Bishop Area Chamber of Commerce & Information Center Report to Bishop City Council for Monday October 27, 2025 Prepared by: Tawni Thomson, Executive Director
Relocation Update: Working to secure local contractor to remodel new location at 218-A South Main Street.

New lighting, flooring, install slat wall paneling for information center. Plan to close information center operations on November 12, following Veteran’s Day holiday which is usually busy. Chamber staff will then work on packing and organizing for moving to new location once it is ready to be occupied.

Regional Collaborations:
• 9/29: participated in meeting with Death Valley partners to gain information about campgrounds, roads and popular sights that have been affected by flooding. • 9/30 & 10/15: met with Bishop City Administrator Pam Foster. • 10/2: participated in Community Economic Development workshop at ES Business Resource Center. • 10/6-10/8: CalTravel Conference. 500+ destination development and tourism professionals gathered in North Lake Tahoe for the annual conference. Julie Faber and Dustin DelGiudice attended on behalf of Bishop Chamber.
• 10/8: participated in meeting with regional partners from USFS, MLT, Mono County and others to gain information about what is open, closed and otherwise affected by Federal shutdown. • 10/21: participated in meeting with CDFW and other regional partners regarding prevention of Golden Mussels in local waterways.

German Media Fam: America Journal is one of the leading German-language travel magazines with an exclusive focus on North America. For over 30 years, it has inspired a quality-conscious, travel-savvy audience with in-depth editorial content, expert insights, and stunning photography. The magazine covers the full spectrum of travel experiences in the US and Canada; from classic road trips and outdoor adventures to cultural highlights, culinary discoveries, and hidden gems. The magazine has a print circulation of 35,500.

Through our partnership with Visit California, Bishop Chamber is assisting with a media fam tour for two journalists 10/27-10/29. The article they are working on will cover Lake Tahoe, Mammoth, Bishop and Lone Pine and should publish in December.

Content Contributors/Influencers: Bishop Chamber recently hosted Smilkos Lens and Flying Dawn Marie.

Lodging Metrics:
• September occupancy for Bishop hotels was 76.9% (1.7% lower than last year). • September ADR was $156 (same as last year).
• September occupancy for unincorporated Inyo County was 74.2% • Nationwide occupancy decreased for seventh consecutive month. • US occupancy for September was 63.4% - down 1.9% from last year. • October occupancy in Bishop for first few weeks was strong – 84.9%. 56 Information Center:

The center has been very busy all through September and October. In October we have averaged 95 interactions per day. Most people are looking for fall color photography locations and many people have inquiries about Federal shutdown impacts.

Seasonal Messaging:

New initiative this year – we took stand-up signs with QR Codes for the Fall Color Tutorial to all hotels and several merchants to help people discover best leaf peeping locations. Very successful – 344 scans.

Partnership with www.californiafallcolor.com has generated good major media coverage including Travel & Leisure, LA Times and SF Chronicle. Bishop Chamber contracts with a local person to submit weekly reports and photos. Also added messaging to encourage mid-week visits and that is working well.

In addition to fall colors, we are currently promoting trail running, golf and fishing, using specific photos to show sunny, warm and dry conditions in the Owens Valley with snowy mountains in the background. This is important as Mammoth Mountain has already started promoting ski season and we don’t want to deter people that don’t like cold weather.
57 Parade:

Christmas Parade is set for 12/6. Theme is “Christmas Through the Decades.” People may dress and decorate parade entries from their favorite era such as rock-n-roll 50’s, psychedelic 60’s or neon 80’s. We hope everyone has fun with it. Will promote the Academy Street market along with the parade marketing. We will also encourage all Main Street shops & restaurants to stay open late that evening, maybe even offer some snacks or specials to take advantage of the crowds gathered for the parade.

Shop Local Raffle: We will continue this project as we have heard from most participants that they are really looking forward to it. Last year 15 local merchants participated, and hundreds of shoppers entered. We have heard from a few merchants that they do not think it is beneficial, and that’s okay. It’s strictly a voluntary program for those who wish to join in.

Social Push: We are also working on a new initiative to highlight chamber-member businesses during the holiday shopping period by highlighting individual businesses on our social media channels. Details are coming soon.
58 ITEM 15

HANDOUT
59 CITY OF BISHOP
P. O. Box 1236
Bishop, CA 93515
City Hall – 760-873-5863
September 23, 2025

MEETING CANCELLATION
The Bishop City Council Regular Meeting scheduled for Monday, October 13, 2025 is cancelled.

The next regular City Council Meeting is scheduled on Monday, October 27, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 301 West Line Street, Bishop, California.
60 AUGUST 2025

BUDGET REPORT
1 61

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGES 3-4 GENERAL FUND REVENUE
PAGES 5-15 GENERAL FUND EXPENSES
PAGES 16-21 ENTERPRISE FUND REVENUE/EXPENSES
PAGES 22-25 SPECIAL FUND REVENUE/EXPENSES
2 62

$ $ %
$ %
$ $
""

$ $ $ $ $
""

$ $ $ %$ %$ $
""

$ $ %$ %$ $
""%

# $ $ $ $ $ $
""%

#

$ $ &%$ &%$ $
""%%

#
$ $ '&$ '&$ $
""

# $ $ $ $ $
""%

$ ''$ ''$ $ $
""&

#
"

$ $ $ $ $
""

#
%$&
%$& $ '%&$ $
""

$%&
$ $ %$& $

$ $ %$ %$ $
""

%&'$ $ %$ %$ $
""

"

$ $ $ $ $
""

(

$
$
$ '$ &$%
""'

$ $ $ $ $
""'

$ $ $ $ $
""

'&&$
% %$ '$ %$

%$%
""

$
$' $ &'$%% &$
""&

$ $ $ $ $
""&

$ $ '$ &$ &$
""&

$ $
$
$ $
""

$ $ &'$ &'$ $
""

(

'$ &'$ '&$
''$
$
""

$&
'&$
$ ''$%& $'
""

" &
$ $ '$ '$ $
""''

$ $ $ $ $
""''

$ $ &$ &$ $
""' $

$ $ $ $ $
""'&

$ $ $ $ $
""''

$ $ $ $ $
""'

) $ %%$

$ '%$'
$

""'

$ $ &
$ &
$ $
""'

( $ $ $ $ $
""'%

$ $ $ '$ $
""'

$ $ $ &&$ %$
""'' '&

%
$ %
$ $ * %
$+ $
""
$

$ %
$
' &$
$% &$
""%

$ $ $
$ $
""%

%'%$ %'%$ $ '$% $&
""%

$ $ %$ %$ $
""%'

)

$ %%$ $ %'$
$
""%'

$ $ $ * $+ $
""%'

$ $ $ $ $
""%
'

&$
$ '$ &$ $'
""%
&

$ $ &$ %'&$ &$
""

%$
$ $ *
$+ $
""

$ $
$
$ $
""

'$ '&$ '$ * $+ %$

$ $
$
$ $
""

, $ $ %$ %$ $
3 63

!

""

&$ %%'$ $ %$ $
""&

$ $ $ $ $
""& $ $ &$ &$ $ ""

"

'
$

$ %$ &$ %$
""

"

$ $ $ * $+ $
""

"

$ $ $
&$ %$
""

"
'$
$ &$
$ %'$
""'

"

'$ %$ &$ &'$
$
""

$ $ $ $ $
""

$ $
$
$ $

'%$
%''$

$
$& '$

'%$
%''$

$
$& '$
4 64

&
$
%$% $
&
$' %$&
""%

'$ $
%$ '

$
$
""

&%$ &$
%

&$ $' $
""&

'''$ $%% &$ ''$' $
""

# '$'' '%$&& '$ ''$ $%
""

"
'$ &$ ''$
$ &$&
""

$ &$& &%$
&'
$
$&
""'

$
&$ %%$ $
'$
""

)

&$ &$ $ &$ $
""

)

$ &$ '$ %$ $
"" $ '
$%
$ '$
' '$
""'

)

$
$ $ '$& $'
""

&$ $%
$
'$' '$
""%

$ $
$
$ $
""&

$

$%% $ &$' $
"" $
)

$ $ &$ &$ $
""
$ $ $ $ $
""' %&$ '$% $ '&$ $ ""

$ $ *

'$+ *

'$+ $

%$& '%$& '%''$ &&$
$

5 65

!

##

"
$
%
$
& """%$ $%
$
##

"$% &&$ ""$ "$" "$
##" '

$ "$ $ "$% $
##% '
$& $ %$ $" &$
##

$ &"
$&" $ $&
##&

""$ "&$ "$ "$ $
## (
)

$
&"%$"
&&$" &$
$
##

%"$ $ &%"$& "&&$

$
##

#
$ $&
$ $ "$
##

"$ %%&$

$
%"$%
$
##"

"""$ ""$

""$ %$"
$%
##

&%"$"& "$
%$ "%&&$& $

$ &&
$& %

$" &$&
$%
##

$ &$& &"$ "&$
$&
##"

$ $ $ $ $
##"
*

%%$&& $%" $ %$% $%
##"%

"&&$

""$ "%$
$
##%

$"

$"
$ +
$"
, $
##&

$& %&$
%$
$ $%
## $ $ "$ "$ $
## '
*
$ $ $ $ $
##

*

%
$& "$% $ &

$&" "$

## %&$ %$ $ %"$ $% ##"

$ $ $ $ $
##

'
"
$ %

"$ &&$ &"%$ $%
##&

""$ "$&%
$ %""$" %$
## $
*

&$

$
$ &$ $"
##" %$" %$ &$ $ %$ ##%

$ $ %$ %$ $
## '

$ $ %$ $ %$
##
$ $ $ $ $
##

$ $ + %"$, + %"$, $

$& """%$"
"$ %&"$%" $
6 66

&"
$" %$%% "
$ %$"
&$
##" '

$ "$" $ "$%% $
##% '
$"& %"$"" &$ &$% $&
##

%$
$& "$& %%&$ $&
##&

"$
"&$ $ $"
$
## (
)

$ $% &$" %$ $
##

$% &$"" %$

&$
$

$"%
&$%
"$
$ $%
##

$& $% %$& &"
$ &$"
##

$ $&" $ $% $%
##"
*

%%$& $" &$
%%$% $&
##"%

&&$&
%$ $ $
& &$
##
(

"$"
"$" $
$
% $
## '
*
$ $ $ $ $
##

*

$ ""$ $ "%$ &$

##"

$ $ $ $ $
##

'
+ %%$, $
$ %&$ $
##&

$ $ $ %&$ "
$
## $
*
$ "$ $ "%$
$
##" "$" %
%$ $ "$ $
##

$ $ + %
$, + %
$, $

&"&$

$" &$ "$& $

##

$% %$ $ $" %$
##

$ "$" &$ $
$&
##

# $
"$ $ $ &$
##" $ $ $ $ $

$ $ &$ %%
$"& $

#"#

'
%$% %$%
$ &"""$" $
#"#"

'
%%%$" %%%$" $ &$% &$
#"#

$ $ + "$, + "$, $

'
&$% &$%

"&$ $%" $

##%
$ ""$ "
$ $ %$
##

$ $ + %$, + %$, $

$ ""$ %&&"$ + ""%$, $
7 67

!

#"#

$% %$" "$ &&$& $%
#"#

$
%$
& "$
%
$" $

#"#

# $ "$ $
&$%% $%
#"#

$ $& $ $" $

#"#

$"
$& "$
$%" $
#"# '
(
$ $ $ $ $
#"# &$ $&
"$ "
%$ $
#"#

'
"$ $ $
""$% $
#"#

%"$%& "$"% &$ %
$ %$"
#"#%

$
% $
$ "&&"$"

$
#"#& %$" "%$ $ &%$& $
#"# '

%$" &
&$"& &
$ &$" $
#"#&

&$ "$& $
""$" $&
#"#"

)

$ $ $ $ $
#"#

"%$
$
&%$ "$ "$

$%& "$& "&&$
&
%$ $

#
#

'
%"%$% %"%$% ""&$ $ %&$
#
#

$ $ * "$+ * "$+ $

%"%$% %"%$% %$
$
$

##

'

$ $ $ $ $
##

$ $ $ $ $

$ $ $ $ $
8 68

"$ "&$
""$ ""&$ "$
##

$
% "
$" "$ %$ $
##

'
$ $ $ $ $
##& '

$
" $" "$
&$% %$
##

$&
$&
$ $ %$
##" '
&$

$
%&$ &"$
$
##

&&$

$% "$ %"&$ $
##%

"&$&
%&$"
$ &%"$&& &$
## ,
-

$ "%%&$
% ""%%$" %$% $
##

"%$&% %$" "&$%
%
$ $
##&

$ $ &$ &$ $
##

%$& &$" "$ $ $&
##

# $&%
$

$" %
$% $
##&

""$&
$
%$& "%"$ $
##

""%$&% &&$
&$ &
$% $
##

"
$
%$ &
"$ "%$% "$
##

$
%
$&
%
%
$ $"" $%
##&
(

$ %
$ $ &$ $%
##&"

&$& $
&$
&$ "$
##"

$ $
$
$ $
## %$ &"$ $ "%$
$&
##

"&$% &$ $ "$" $

##

&%$ &$
$ "%$
&$
##

(

"
$ $ $

%$
%
$&
## $ $&% %$ " $ &$
##&

&$ $% $ ""$ $
##

'
&&&$" &
"&$" %$ $& "$
##

$ $ $ $ $
##%

""&$""
&$"& $
$" $
## $
(
"&$& $ %$ "&
$% $
##

$
$ $ $ $
##&

$ $ $ $ $
##&
$ &
"$ $ &
&$ "$
## '

"$%% $& $ &"%$
" $

##&

&$% %$
$ &$% $%
##&&

$ $ $ $ $
##&

""$ ""$ %
$
"$ $
##"%

)

$ $ $ $ $
##"

$ &&$ $ %$
"$
##

"&$% $" %$ "%$& "$"

&
$%
"&%&$
&%"&$
&%$" $
9 69

"$
&%"$
%$ $%% $%
##

"$" %
$% &$ &$ $
## ,

"%$"
%$
$ *
%$
+ $
##& '

"%%$ "$&
$ ""$"" $%
##" '
&$
"$" &$ &$% $
##

$& $% %$ &
"""$% %$
##%

"$"% "
$
" %$ &$& $
##

$ %&$ $ &"$ $

## ,
-

$ &&%$
&"$
$ $
##

&
$ &$ $ &$" &$
##

# "$"

$
$ &"
$ "$
##%

$" &$ $ "$"% $
##&

$ $ %$ %$ $
##

"&$% "$& "$ "$% $
##

%%$
% %$
%$%
$%
$
##

$ "$" "%$ $% $%
##&
-

$ $ &$ &$ $
##&

$ $ $ $ $
##&
(

%$& $ %%%$ "
$
&$
##&"

%$
"
$" "$ &$
$
##"

$ $ $ $ $
## $ $ $ &&"$ $& ##

"$ &
$ "$ &$ $
## '
(
$ $ $ $ $
##

(

$%
&&$"& "$ $"
$&
## &$ &$ $ %&$& $" ##&

%$
& %$
& $ %"$" $&
##

'
"
$"
&$ $
"%$% $
##

&"$" $% $
"$" $%
##%

$
%

$""
$ ""
$& $
## $
(
$ $ $ $ $
##&

$ $ $ $ $
##& "$%% "
$ %$
&$ %$&
## '

$ &$ $
"$ "$%
##

)

"$

$& $ "$%
$
##&

$ $ $ &%&$ $&
##&

$ $ $ $ $
##
$ $ $ $ $
##"%

)

$ $
$
$ $

"&&$ "
"$ "&&$%
"%$ $

10 70

!

##

&$% "%
$ &"$ &$ $
##" '
$
$" $ %
$& $
##

$" &"$
&

"$
&$& "$
##%

$"& %$ %"$
&$ $

## ,
-

$ %$& %%$
&$% $
##

$ %$%
&"$ ""$
$
##

$ $" $ * $"+ $
##&

$
&$
$
&$
$
##

&$
$% %$ $" $%
##

$% &%$
$ &"$
$&
##&
(

$% &$& $ %$" "$&
##&"

"%$& %$"
$ &"%%$%& $
##

(

$ $
$ %"$%
$
## $ $ "$ "$ $
##&

$ $ $ $ $
##

'

$

$
$ &
&$ $
##%

$ * $+ $ $ * $+
## $
(
&$ %$ ""$ "$ $
##& $ $ $ $ $
## '

$ $ $ $ $

"&$ "%$"

&$&" &&$% $&
11 71

&$% &$
$

%"&$" "$
##

%$
$
%$
%$ "$"
##& '

$ $ &"$ &"$ $
##" '

$
$ ""$ %"$"% $

$
"$&&
$ &&$" $
##%

%$%&
$ %&&$ "$& &$
## ,
-

$ &%$ &"&$ $" $
##

%$% &%
$
$"
%&$%" &$
##

# $% "$
$ $ "$"
##%
"

$
&$
"$ "$ %$%
##

$ %$ "%
%$
&$% %$
##&

$" %&$ $
% &$% $%
##

"%$%
$ &
%$
""$ $
##

$ &
$" &"$&
$%
%$

$ ""$" "$ $ $%
##&
(

$ %$ &$ %$
% &$
##&"

%$" $
$ "%$"
$
##

&
"&$&

$ "$ """$
$

(

$ %$" $ $"& %$
## $ $% &$ %$% $& ##&

""$

%$"& $
$" $
##

'
$ $ &$ &$ $
##

&$& $% &$
%$& $
##%

"$" "$% $ %%"$
$
## $
(
&$ $% $ &%$ $
##&

$ $ $ $ $
##& %$& $& $ &&$
$&
## '

$& $& $ %

$" &$
##&

$ $ "%$ "
$ $

##"

'

$ $ $ $ $
##"%

)

$ $ $ $ $
##"

'

$ $ $ $ $
##"&

&
$ &
$%"
$ &
$& "$"

&$"
$& $ "$ &$

12 72

,

##

%&$&% ""$" %
$" ""&$
$"
##

%$& &&"$ $
%"$" $
##& '

$
$
%$
"$ $
##" '
%$
&$

$ "$ $"
##

$
%$" &
&&$ %"&$ $%
##%

"

$& $
%$ "%$% $
## ,
-

$ &$ &$ &&$"" $
##

$"
&&$ %$ """$%
$
##

# &&$"%
$% $
$% $

##

"&"
$&" $ $ &&$%
$
##&

"$ $ &$ &"$
$
##

&
%$ &
$ ""%$ &%$% $

$" ""$ %&$
&
$
##

$ %$" %%$ $& $%
##&

$ $ $ $ $
##&
(

%$ &$" "&$
$
&$
##&"

$
&$% "&$ "&$%
$"
## $ $ $ $ $
##

&$"
$% $ &"&$ &$"
## '
(
$ $ $ $ $
##

(

$ $ $ $ $
## "$%
$%" "$ &%
$& %$%
##&

$ &$ &$ %"$& $"
##

'
"&$ &&&$ %$ ""$ $
##

&$& %"%$& &$ %%$" $
##%

&"$
&
&$%" %$

$& $
## $
(
&$ "$ $ $ $
##& %%$

$ $ "$"
$
## '

$% $ %$"
$

)

$ $ $ $ $
##&

$ $
$ "%$ $
##

$ $ $ $ $
##
,
' $ $ $ $ $
##"

'

$
$
$ "$ $
##"%

)

$ $ &
$ &
$ $
##

"%$
$
"$ "$ "$"
##%

"%$%%
&$ $ &$

$

,

"&$ $ &
&&$" &
%$
"
$
13 73

#&#

$&% &$&& &""$ &$%"
$"
#&#

$ $ $ $ $
#&#& '

$ $ $ $ $
#&#" '
$ $ ""$ $"
%$
#&#

&$& ""$ "$ "$" $&
#&#%

$% $& &$ $
$
#&# ,
-

$ %$
$% $
$
#&#

$"
"$&
"$ &$" $
#&#

# $ $ "$ "$ $
#&#

$ %$

$ * %$

+ $
#&#&

$ $
$ %$ $
#&#

&$
$% &
%$ "$" $
#&#

&$& $ %%$ ""$ &$
#&#

$ "$% $ $& $

#&#&
(

$% "$
$ "%$% $
#&#&"

$" %
$
$ %
$

$%
#&# '
(
$ $% $ * $%+ $
#&#

(

$
&
$% $ $ $
#&# $ $ $ $ $
#&#&

* $+ %%$ $ &"$ &$

#&#

'
"
$ "
$
$

$ $
#&#%

$ $ $ &$& $
#&# $
(
$ &$ $ &"$ &$
#&#& $&
$ "$ &"
$
$
#&#
$ $ $ $ $

"$ &$

$

$ $

##

"%$
%&$
"%$ """$& $

##

$&
$% $ %
$ $"
##

# %$"& $
$ %&$ $"
##

$ $ $ $ $
##

'
$ $ $ $ $
##%

"&$% $
$ "&$% $
##& $% $ $

$% %$

"
$& %
$" %%"
$
"$
$
14 74

#
#

&&"&$& %%$% &$ &$ "$
#
#

"&
$
&$&% $ $ $"
#
#

# %$ $ $ %
$ $

#
# $ $ $ $ $
#
#

&"$" &%$ $ %%$
&$

#
# $ $ $ $ $
#
#&

$ $ $ $ $
#
#

'
$ $ $ $ $
#
#%

&$% &"$
"$ "$ $
#
#& $& %&$ "$ $% &$
#
#&

""$% &
$& %$ &$" "$
#
#

)

$ $
$
$ $
#
#"%

)

$ $ $ $ $

$&& "%%$" %$ ""$
$

#%#

%%%&$& %
$ &$ &&$
$
#%#

%$% $% %$ $% $
#%#

# $ $ $ $&% $
#%#

$ $ $ $ $
#%# '
(
$ $ &$ &$ $
#%#

'
$ $ $ $ $
#%#%

%$
$ %$ &&$
%$
#%#& $ $ $ $ $

%$% "$& ""$ &$" $

"$
&""$ &"&&$& %&$
$"

'

'

* %"""
$%+ *

"""$&+ * &&$&+
&$ *%&$
15 75

!

'

##

,

$& &&$ %$
$" %$
##

$ $ "$
$ $
##

'

$
"&$
& &$ "&$"
$
##

'

""$
$"" $

$& $
##

'

'

$ $ "
$ "
$ $

'

$% "$
%$ &%"%$ $

'

$% "$
%$ &%"%$ $
16 76

%"$"% &%$" "$% $ "$
##

&$" %
$ %$
&&
$
$
##& '

$ $ %"%&$ %"%&$ $
##" '

$ %$ $ &&$ $
##

"%$ %"&$%

$
%$
$
##%

&"$" $&& %$ &$" $
## ,
-

$ "&&&$ "&
"$ $% $
##

&$"% "$ &$& "$ &$

# &$" $ $ %$" $
##%
&$ "$" "&$ &"$& $%
##

""$%" &%$% "&$
"$ %$"
##&

"$ %$& %%$%

"%$%
$ &%$
%"$ $
##

&$
"
$ "&%$%%
$
% %$
##

$ "%&$& "$ $" $%
##&
(

$ %$ $ %$ &$
##&"

%
$&& &%&$% $ $ "$
##

&&$
%&$%
%&$ ""$ "$
##

(

%$ $%%
$

$ $
## $ $%
$ "%$% $

##&

$%
$ &$
$% &$"
##

'
$ %$

&$ """$ $"
##

&$
&$ "$ &"$% "$
##%

$& %"$""
&$
$& $
## $
(
%$ $% %$
"%$ $%
##& %$& $&
$ &$ &%$&
## '

"$ $ $ %%%$% $"
##

$ $ $ $ $
##&

$ $ $ $ $
##

$ $ ""&$ ""&$ $
##
$ $ $ $ $
##"

$ $ &$ &$ $
##"

'

%$
%$

%$ "%%&%$" &$
##"%

)

$ $ &$ &$ $
##

&
$ &
$%" %$ &%$& "$

"$& %%$
%%%$& "%

$"
$

"$& %%$
%%%$& "%

$"
$

'

'

&&$& * %%"$%+ &$" &%$% *%$+ 17 77

!

'

&##

,

$" %$
"$ &$
$
&##

'

&"$
%&$
$
%$%
$
&##

'

$ $ $ ""$ $"
&##

$ $ $
$ $

'

"$"
$
"$ %
$
$

'

"$"
$
"$ %
$
$

18 78

!

&##

$% &"$&
&$" %"%%$ $%
&##

&$"
$ %&$
"$& %$

&##& '

$ $ &$ &$ $
&##" '
$"
%$
&$ $ $
&##

&$% &"$
%$ "
&$ $&
&##%

$ "$%& &$ &"%$" $
&## ,
-

$ &%$% &$& "$" $
&##

$% "$
$ "&$%% &$
&##

# $ $&" $ $& %$"
&##%
$"
$" ""&$ &$& $
&##

%$ &"$ $ %
$ %$

&##&

&$"& "$& $ %$ $
&##

&$ "$ "
"$" $& $
&##

"$
"$& "%$ &&$" $
&##

$ %$
% "&$ "$ $%
&##&
(

$ $" &$
"$% $
&##&"

&$% $& $
"%$% "$
&##

""$ %$ &%$ &
%$% $
&##

(

%$ $ "%$ "%$ $
&## $ "$&&
$ "%$" $&
&##&

&$
% %$% &$
"$ "$
&##

'
$ $ $

$ $
&##

$& "
$ "&$&" "$
&##%

$%
$"
&
$ &&&$
$"
&## $
(
"$ %$ %$
%$% $
&##

'
$ $ $ $ $
&##& $
$%
$ $ &%$
&## '

"$% $% $ $ $
&##

$ $ $ $ $
&##&

$ $ $ $ $
&##

$ $ "%%$ "%%$ $
&##
$ $ "$ "$ $
&##"

$ $ $ $ $
&##"

'

$ $
$
$ $
&##"%

)

$ $ $ $ $
&##"

$ $ %"$
%"$
$
&##"

$ $ "$ "$ $
&##

"$ "$%
"$ "$% "$"

&&$

%$ &&%""$ "
$
$

&&$

%$ &&%""$ "
$
$

'

'

""$% *
&$%+ * ""$+ * %&$

+ *$&+
19 79

!

'

##

,

"$
"$
$ ""$
$&
##

$ %"$ $ $ $
##

#
%%$
"$ ""$ &$ $
##
"
#
&$ $ $ %
$ %$%

'

$

$
"$ %$
%$&

'

$

$
"$ %$
%$&
20 80

$& $%" &$
$& %$
##

$% "$
&$ $" $
##" '
$" $% $ &$% %$&
##

%$
"
$

$ "$" $%
##%

$"& "$ &&$ $% &$
## ,
-

$ &%$" &%&$ $% $
##

"
$ %$
&$ $
$
##

# $% &$" $ %$& &$
##

$" $"& %$ %%$" %$
##&

$
$ $ $ %$
##

$
$& "$ "$ $&
##

$ %
%$% $ $% $%
##&
(

%$& $" $ %&$% $
##&"

%$ "$ &
$ &$" %$
##

$
$ &&$ &&&$
"$
##

(

$ $ $ $ $
##

'
$ $ $ &%%%$ $
##

&"$"& &$

$ "$% $
##%

"$%" "$%"
$
%$& $"
##& $ $ $ $ $
## '

$ $ $ $ $
##

$ $ &$ &$ $
##"

'

$ $ $ $ $

$
"$% """"$ "%$% $

$
"$% """"$ "%$% $

'

'

%"$ * ""$+ * "$+ $ *&&$"+ 21 81

!

'

##
$& $& $ "$
%$
##

# $ $ $ $ $
##

$
$
$ &"$ %$
##
" "%$%
"%$%
$
%$ %$

##

& %$" %$"
$ %
$% %$"
##
$&"
$&" &$ %
$& $%

'

$ $ &$ $%
$

'

$ $ &$ $%
$
22 82

%&"$
&$
"""
$& &
$& %$

##

"$
% &$& $ * &$&+ $
##& '

$ $ &&$ &&$ $
##" '
$% $& $
$
$"
##

&$" "
$&%
%$& "%$
$%
##%

&$
$" $ "$ &$
## ,
-

$ %$% %$%" $ $
##

&$ %&$% $" %&$%
$%
##

# $"" &$" $ * &$"+ $
##%

"$
&$ %$ $
$"
##

""$
"

$
"$&

"$&& %$
##&

%$"%
$
&%$&&

$
%$
##

&$ $

$ %%$&% $
##

$ "%%$ "$ "$%% $

##&
(

$ $%" &$ %$& &$
##&"

%"$%& ""$" "%
$ "%$ %$&
##%

$ $ "$ "$ $

&
$ "$ &%$&& "&$& $

&
$ "$ &%$&& "&$& $

'

'

&$ * $%+ "$"
%$% *"$+
23 83

$$
$ $

!

'

##

,

"$
& $%
$
"&$ $&
##"

$ $ $ $ $

'

"$
& $%
$
"&$ $"

'

"$
& $%
$
"&$ $"
24 84

$$
$ $

!

$$
$ $
##& '

$ $ "$ "$ $
##%

$ $ $ $ $
## $
(
$ $ $ $ $
## '

$ $ $ $ $
##

%$"

$ $ "&"$ %$

$$
$ $ %$"

$ $ "&"$
$

%$"

$ $ "&"$
$

'

'

* &$+ * &$+ * %&$+ * & %$%+ *&$"+
25 85
AUGUST 2025

BANK RECONCILIATION
REPORT
1 86

"# $

$%
$
$

$&#'

(

)()
##*

# +#', -.*.

'

/-
---0.*

1
#!

2 ---0-/
"# $ %
/
--
0// 3

.
.0

"# $

*/-0 . 3
%,#'
.

2 .0
2
$&#' 0

$&#' 0

.

(
,
,

,
) 0
"# $ %

%

+#',
%

'
#
%

+#',
%

'
#
%

+#',
%

'
#
%

+#',
%

'
#

/0 *2
/0 . 0 / //0

- 02- *

2. 0 *. *.0 2 *
0
-20
* / 0

/ -/0

0.
*2 /02
2 0
2 -
/0
2 * 0

2 -
0
2* /
0
-

20
4 $3

/
--
0//
%

$
' %
"# $
'
"# $

+#',

'
#

+#',

'
#

+#',

'
#

+#',

'
#

0/* -*
*/0 -22 */0
22* - 02/
*/2
.20

2-
-
-
*0
. 2.*/
0 2/.. -

0
2 .0-2 2-
0/
-*-- **0*- -2
0
--
* 2/0* -
2/ --/0
./ 2
-
0 .
/ 220
-
.2
/0 / .2
/0 / ./

.-0 /*
2 --0
/.
0/

*0
/- 0

2 2-0

2 . 0 .
20* /.
*20
22 **0

02-
/- *0

/
/0

2.2 *-0
2
2// *0.
2 * *-0
2

--0
*
-*
0 **.
-/0 **
0 *

0 *

2. *0*
*
-
2*0/- *
.
*0/
*
/ .*0// **-
-0
**/
0 **--
0 *2. 20 *2 .0
* 2 .220
- *-/ ** 0
- *-2
-/0 *-2
//0/
*--
2 -/-0.
*.

*
02 */
-
-/0 */
/ .0*
*
-*
0 *
-/ 2
/
0 *
.2

0 2 2
0
2 -
2 0

2- 2/0 2

0 2
-/0-

2
0 2- 2. 0
* 2/ 2/0
2
* //0*.
2

.0/ 2*2 2
-*
0 2*-
0 2*.

0*
2*
../0 22 *

0 22

2*0-. 22
20
22-
20 2
2*0 2 * - 0 2 -*0-
2 /

0.2 2-2 *- 0-
2-. * 0 2-/ -* 0-

2.2 2-0

2.
0. 2.- -
0/ 2.. - -0**
2./ *-0 2.
*/02 2/
/ 0
. 2/
.0/
2/2

*0
2 2/- */0/
2/

-0*/ 2
-
02
2 87

+#',

'
#

+#',

'
#

+#',

'
#

+#',

'
#
2
2

0. 2

/ 0/ 2
. -
0*
2
/

/-
0 2
2

-/0 2 *-
0 * 2 0 2
-

02 2* 0 22

..0. 2 *
. 0
2- *
.*/0
*
2.

0.* 2/ -0/* 2

02 2
0 2
. 022 2
.//0 2* 20 22 20-
2 0 . 2-

/.02 2. /
-/0/ 2/
.0*

2
*
0 2

20 2

.-20 2

0-
2
* 0 2
2 /0*. 2
/0
2
- .
0 *
2
.
20
2
/
-
.0 2

**/0 2* * 0
2* -

0- 2*
-*0 2** .022 2*2 * 0
2* .0
2*-
-*0/* 2*. -0** 2*/ 0
/
2*

*0
22 *
0/ 22 2 0 22

20
22*
20 222 /0 22 0 . 22- --0
22. 2

2.0-* 22/ 20* 22

02- 2 .*20

2
*0. 2

* 0 . 2* /0 .
* 0.*
4 $3

2*

*/-0 .

$
*'

"# $ -'

$&#'

%

'
# %

'
#

,0 0
4 $3
0

$&#'

3 88
AUGUST 2025

COMBINED CASH REPORT
1 89

!!

"
#

!!
$

%&
#

!!

" #

!!

&%&&#

!!

"'

#

!!

$

&#

!!

"
#

!!

&#&

!!

#

&#%

!!

(

&#% )

#

&&&#

*
&&#%

' % #

%
*
#

&#&

#

%
#&
&

% &#%

&%#

&&&%#

&#

% %#

' #

*

$

#
&

& #

! *"

$

%#

&#%

$+

% #%%
%
* &&&#

*

,

- #

&&%#

#

##
# # %
%#%

** & #
%

#
#
# &
#&

*
#

$

#

"

#
&

"

#

* - #

!

#

#
#

$

#

+

- #

*

&#
2 90

!
"

#

!

$
$#%$

$#%

&

&& '

$#% (
)

#
3 91
AUGUST 2025

INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
REPORT
1 92

INVESTMENT ACCOUNTS
LAIF
STATEMENT PERIOD: AUGUST 2025
ENDING BALANCE: $904,839.50
AVERAGE MONTHLY YIELD: 4.251%

CALIFORNIA CLASS
STATEMENT PERIOD: AUGUST 2025
ENDING BALANCE: $19,877,722.00
AVERAGE MONTHLY YIELD: 4.326%

COMBINED CITY OF BISHOP INVESTMENTS
STATEMENT PERIOD: AUGUST 2025
ENDING BALANCE: $20,782,561.50
AVERAGE MONTHLY YIELD: 4.323%
2 93
!" # " $%PDFT%%%%%*+ **,%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
City$of$Bishop+,,$W$Line$StreetBishop3$CA$5+678
Tel#$%&''($)*+,-./* www1californiaclass1com
Summary&Statement
August$*/?$.+.-
Page$/$of$*
Investor(ID*(CA-./-./0.

California$CLASSCalifornia(CLASS Average&Monthly&Yield1&2345678 Beginning
Balance Contributions Withdrawals
Income
Earned
Income
Earned
YTD
Average&Daily
Balance
Month&End
Balance
CA"#$"#$%#"###$ City)of)Bishop $012#31$0#402 2##1###4## #4## 5$167$4#3 6%010%3458 $012551380427 $01%5515884##TOTAL HIJ2K7JHIK3I2 2KKJKKK3KK K3KK LHJ64H3K7 6MIJIM73L5 HIJ2LLJ75I324 HIJMLLJL553KK 943
City$of$Bishop
Tel#$%&''($)*+,-./* www1californiaclass1com
Account&Number,&CA./0./01/.///0
Account&Statement
August$*/?$.+.-
Page$.$of$*
Account$Summary Average&Monthly&Yield1&&2345678
Beginning
Balance Contributions Withdrawals
Income
Earned
Income
Earned
YTD
Average&Daily
Balance
Month&End
Balance
California(CLASS ,-./01.,-02-/ /00.000200 0200 3,.45,201 46-.-61237 ,-./33.17-2/5 ,-.633.377200 Transaction$ActivityTransaction&Date Transaction&Description Contributions Withdrawals Balance Transaction&Number0680,87074 Beginning(Balance ,-./01.,-02-/0687387074 Contribution /00.000200 ,50710685,87074 Income(Dividend(Reinvestment 3,.45,2010685,87074 Ending(Balance ,-.633.377200 954
Daily%Rates
August%&'(%)*)+
Page%&%of%&
Tel3%45667%8&*9+)'& www;californiaclass;com
Performance results are shown net of all fees and expenses and reflect the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings; Many factors affect performance including changes inmarket conditions and interest rates and in response to other economic( political( or financial developments; Investment involves risk including the possible loss of principal; Noassurance can be given that the performance objectives of a given strategy will be achieved;% Past performance is no guarantee of future results0 Any financial and4orinvestment6decision6may6incur6losses0 California(CLASS
California(CLASS
Date Dividend%Rate Daily%Yield
*5P*'P)*)+ *;***&+6*8& Q;&QQ6R*5P*)P)*)+ *;********* Q;&QQ6R*5P*&P)*)+ *;********* Q;&QQ6R*5P*QP)*)+ *;***''5S)) Q;&)86R*5P*+P)*)+ *;***''5&*& Q;&'5'R*5P*SP)*)+ *;***''5Q&+ Q;&))8R*5P*6P)*)+ *;***''5&S6 Q;&)*QR*5P*5P)*)+ *;***&++5&8 Q;&)8QR*5P*8P)*)+ *;********* Q;&)8QR*5P'*P)*)+ *;********* Q;&)8QR*5P''P)*)+ *;***''5+&+ Q;&)S+R*5P')P)*)+ *;***''5QQ* Q;&)&'R*5P'&P)*)+ *;***''5+&8 Q;&)S6R*5P'QP)*)+ *;***''5*5) Q;&'**R*5P'+P)*)+ *;***&+Q6+8 Q;&'S&R*5P'SP)*)+ *;********* Q;&'S&R*5P'6P)*)+ *;********* Q;&'S&R*5P'5P)*)+ *;***''5&6) Q;&)*SR*5P'8P)*)+ *;***''5Q'& Q;&))'R*5P)*P)*)+ *;***''5'+* Q;&')+R*5P)'P)*)+ *;***''68+) Q;&*+&R*5P))P)*)+ *;***&+Q8+6 Q;&'5SR*5P)&P)*)+ *;********* Q;&'5SR*5P)QP)*)+ *;********* Q;&'5SR*5P)+P)*)+ *;***''568* Q;&&+8R*5P)SP)*)+ *;***''8*&S Q;&QQ5R*5P)6P)*)+ *;***''5865 Q;&Q)6R*5P)5P)*)+ *;***''56)5 Q;&&&SR*5P)8P)*)+ *;***&++&66 Q;&)&5R*5P&*P)*)+ *;********* Q;&)&5R*5P&'P)*)+ *;********* Q;&)&5R 965
!"#$% &'()#* +),(-./(). 01)2
3454 6"7 89:;<8
=$#>$/()."? @& 89:<8A<<<B
C8BDE DFGAG<<B

HIJKILMIN OPQ OROS
TUVW XYZ[
\]VU U^[_`a[ ]Ybcdef
gh[eij
klmn op qlHros
klmn tuvlwlHmxtmox
syoy qoz {O|}
qlHrosQ kt P|S{~

P{~R}
tK OROS HKKILIK

¡
m¢K£ uIJ¢¤K¥ RyRR qI¤¤ q£¦I¥ PR~Q|PySR
m¢K£ §¤K¨©Nª£¥ RyRR «©¤ q£¦I¥ PR~Q|PySR
6 97
!"!#$ %&'()
*+,- ./012
*+34 ./056
78- ./090
:;<=, ./02>
78<?@ ./A>A
B:CDE:;;F<G=F3H43GEI8G4J0KL ./.M
EB:CDEN8<3=3OPEI8G=FJ0KL M/MMM>0M162026M59>1
EB:CDE:QH=3=PG<8G=R4ESFPGJ>KTL M/>2
U7C:E:R4<8O4EB=V4J>KL 0.2
EB:CDED8=<EW8,+4ED8?GF<J>KL >/MM>>62A>M
U7C:EX8=,-J>KL ./05
U7C:EY+8<G4<EGFEX8G4J>KL ./09
Z<48P+<=4P
10/05[
:O43?=4P
02/.5[
S4<G=V=?8G4PEFVE
X4;FP=G\]83^E_FG4P
6/>5[
Z=H4E
X4;FP=GP
A/>2[
SFHH4<?=8,
U8;4<
5/>9[
SF<;F<8G4E
]F3QP
M/5>[
BF83P
M/>5[
`abcdeEfgcEhiiajbkalmclbEjhbcEklnopqcdEklbcjcdbEchjlcqEalEbgcErhostuvEvpiiocmclbhoEscldkalEshwmclbEipjdphlbEbaxaycjlmclbEraqcEz{|z}E ~n~E
fgcEicjnclbhcEaEhqmklkdbjhbkycEnadbEc
phodEbgcEbabhoEhqmklkdbjhbkycEnadbEqkykqcqEwEbgcE
phjbcjowEklbcjcdbEchjlkldEfgcEohEijaykqcdEbghbE
hqmklkdbjhbkycEnadbdEhjcElabEbaEcnccqE}EaE
phjbcjowEtu``xvEaEbgcEplqEacycjEkEbgcEccEhkowEfjchdpjwEkooEuhbcEalbgcEohdbEqhwEaE bgcEkdnhoEwchjEkdEcoaEEbgclEhqmklkdbjhbkycEnadbdEdghooElabEcnccqE|EaE phjbcjowEtu``xvEaEbgcEplqEajEbgcEdpdc
pclbEkdnhoEwchjE
F+<?4L
J>KEG8G4EFVES8,=VF<3=8EVV=?4EFVEG@4EZ<48P+<4<
J0KEG8G4EFVES8,=VF<3=8EVV=?4EFVEG@4ESF3G<F,,4<
E "E$ ¡E
¢££¤$¥E¦¥ §#¨)©
ª« ¬E£¤E®¯$
#E£E°±ª)²ª'(
³¥ ¡E$#EE´E¥ µ &EE¶¥´E ³¥ ¡E®$# ·!$ ¡E£¤
·!$E¢§§E¸ª¹°ª'(
S@8<GEQF4PE3FGE=3?,+Q4Eº>M>0MMM/MME=3EHF<GO8O4PE»@=?@E4¼+8G4PGFEM/MM>[/U4<?43G8O4PEH8-E3FGEGFG8,E>MM[EQ+4EGFE<F+3Q=3O/ §E¡E#$$E ¤¤!$
$ ¡E$£ ¥E½¯#¥$¥E¨)©
¾ª¹)ª'(
¿)¸(&¹Eµ¥ ¥
7 98
!"# !$%& '(!)"#)*"+* !"# ,-#)!.#*/!"()$"&
01234235 4630 4634 345
01237235 4630 4635 348
01233235 4630 4635 345
01239235 4630 4635 34:
01230235 4630 4635 34:
01291235 4630 4635 34:
0129;235 4639 4635 34;
0129:235 4639 4635 341
01298235 4639 4635 359
01295235 4639 4635 353
01294235 4639 4635 35:
01297235 4639 4635 35:
01293235 4639 4635 35:
01299235 4633 4635 35;
01290235 4633 4635 350
01201235 4633 4635 350
0120;235 4637 4635 344
0120:235 4637 4635 34:
01208235 4637 4635 34:
01205235 4637 4635 34:
01204235 4634 4635 348
01207235 4634 4635 34;
01203235 4634 4635 34;
01209235 4635 4638 34;
0;279235 4635 4638 34;
0;270235 4635 4638 34;
0;231235 4635 4638 34;
0;23;235 4635 4638 347
0;23:235 4635 4638 343
0;238235 4635 4638 344
0;235235 4635 4638 344
0;234235 4635 4638 34;
0;237235 4635 4638 34;
0;233235 4635 4638 34;
0;239235 4635 4638 341
0;230235 4635 4638 341
<,=>?@AB>,*CD,DE*DAE,CFAEA
?>@B,/,G*<H,
H/>,* !$%&*EII#J"$-#*K$#%L
8 MNOPQR*RPSQT*TUSV*WUX*YSZQS[X*[O\PXOQ*]OPWV*UY*QUVVSV ^\TOXST_*12342303599 !" #$% &' (!"()!*)+ !" "( ,")- !'(#!%
./012345167/78)748/69484
2135/-/:).;/
;-1+ #$%)8<<"=!#>")?#"$
@ABCDBEF GHEF GHEI EFE
@ABCABEF GHEF GHEI EFJ
@ABCKBEF GHEI GHEI EFI
@ABCIBEF GHEI GHEI EFI
@ABCFBEF GHEI GHEI EFI
@ABCGBEF GHEF GHEI EFF
@ABCJBEF GHEF GHEI EFC
@ABCEBEF GHEF GHEI EFE
@ABCCBEF GHEF GHEI EFC
@ABC@BEF GHEF GHEI EFJ
@AB@DBEF GHEF GHEI EFJ
@AB@ABEF GHEF GHEI EFJ
@AB@KBEF GHEF GHEI EFE
@AB@IBEF GHEI GHEI EFG
@AB@FBEF GHEI GHEI EFF
@AB@GBEF GHEI GHEI EFI
@AB@JBEF GHEI GHEI EFK
@AB@EBEF GHEI GHEI EFA
@AB@CBEF GHEI GHEI EFD
9 LMNOPQ)QORPS)STRU)VTW)XRYPRZW)ZN[OWNP)\NOVU)TX)PTUURU ][SNWRS^)DBEGBE@EF100 AUGUST 2025

WARRANT REGISTER REPORT
1 101
TO: CITY COUNCIL/CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR
DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 2025
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANT REGISTER FOR THE MONTH OF
AUGUST 2025

COMMERCIAL WARRANTS
CHECK # 13820,13906-14034,
14036-14061,14064-14152
AMOUNT ISSUED: $619,660.07

MANUAL CHECKS & PAYROLL WARRANTS
AMOUNT ISSUED: $1,092,767.87
TOTAL AMOUNT ISSUED: $1,712,427.94
2 102

"#
$
"##

%
"#
$
"##

%
&' (

(

)'*+ !*'
( (!,
,*!''

"##

-
" -.
( /00!,
,*!''

"##

"".-
( (

!,
,*!''

"##

1
.
1 (
,!,
,*!''

"##

1
".

( /*0!,
,*!''

"##

2-
.

( !,
,*!''

"##

2 1
-1.
2 (
3!,
,*!''

"##

-.1"
( /*
!,
,*!''

"##

" 2 .
(

!,
,*!''

"##

.
( *+4!

'!''

"##

( *
5&'

"##

2"2.2
( *
5&'

"##

1 .
( *
!6
"##

( 7
5&'

"##

1
.-
( *+6
!'

"##

-
.-

( 3
8*!''

"##

1 .

( 4*9
!

'!8!
"##

- 1

( 3
/!2"

:;

"##

" -

( /
*!,
,*!''

"##

2.-2
( !83

34:
333(<!(&&=8>:88
!=/
3:=
"##

2 .2
( !83
3<!(&
-#
-#
49
-#

"##

- .1
( !83

34:
333(<!(&!=/:88
34
3:=
"##

"
".

( !83
3<!(&-#
#
49"##

"##

" .
( !83
3<!(&"#1#
49"#-#

"##

1
"".

(
'!,
,*!''

"##

".2

(! 4699)
3=43
#!
8!>
"#
-#

22 .

(! :69!=4994:?33)43

"#
#

2 .

(! :6963!4:)/<!:
9)(:4:9):)/:).
"#
#

- 1.

(! :69!:=434
:!8
"#
#

1. (! @!9:!43
"#
#

".
(! !&:!
"#
#

(! !8:59
):!
9!(!)(
"#
#

-
.2
(! 9=):4>
:)4:)/
"#
#

(! (3495A!43
!)(9A3

"#
#

-
.
(! 5
9)4:3

"#
#

1 21
.

(! 6=)4
9!)3
:).
"#
#

(! 94:=
"#
#

.
(! B=!(:3)483!:)/=!
:).
"#
#

- .
(! B=:889

"#
#

" 12.2
(! 9=463
)!8:59
):!3(:9)
"#
#

2
2.

(! =5,
:
.
"#
#

.
1 (! ?3
:C9)A:
383
"#
#

"2.
( =)(3
6:88
63
>88.
"#
"#

2. 1
( !)4!)!
5
!):9
"#
"#

-
.

( /
:6!
!!)(!

"#
"#

1 -.

(
3>)98(
&:
"#
"#

".
1 ( )!?!83

>!)
"#
"#

2 2.2

( &!@9)
469!3.
"#
"#

- -12.

( 998

349)
"#
"#

" "

1. 2
( !(3
!
&938>)
"#
"#

" .1

( !

383>
"#
"#

.1
( /9)C!83C

93
4 "#
"#

--.

( 3)):
&3

>
"#
"#

.
1 ( 3)):
@!
3)
"#
"#

.
1 ( (3

83?:
"#
"#

.
(
=388

34 "#
"#

"1
.1
( 9)(
!/9)
(9)9?!)
"#
"#

2 "1."-
(
!/3

!
:!)!
"#
"#

- -.2
3 103

!"
#
!"$"

%
!"
#
!"$"

%
&' (

(

)'*+ *'
( ,-..
/0
!"
!"

$! $12
3 ( 4//)0

/5/
!"
!"

$
32
6 ( 5/ )(
54.
!"
!"

$6
11323
( 7 80
.59
/
0 !"
!"

$6$ !162
!
( 5

.0 : )
!"
!"

$6 63
2
( /5;(0)
-90
!"
!"

$6 3!2

( (5)(0
5 &0- 7
!"
!"

$66 $

$2$
( (54(
0//-5.
!"
!"

$6
3
2 !
( 0 //
)5 7
!"
!"

$63
662
!
( )<(0

<
!"
!"

$61 $
12!
( )9
/54
!"
!"

$6! 1$
233
( .
40/0)
/<
!"
!"

$6 1$2
!
( (4
7
/ -
0 !"
!"

$

12
3 ( /
9 ( -
!"
!"

$
$ 3!2

( )5..
(0)0
!"
!"

$

2!
( (08-)0).
/0 7
!"
!"

$
$2$$
( ( 8-
0//
<
!"
!"

$
6 32

( (07 80)

)(5)
!"
!"

$

662
!
( &57)5)

(<
!"
!"

$
3 6$2$
( )500

5/-)
!"
!"

$
1 1$2$
(
.-)0=
(4/0
!"
!"

$
! 1123

( 5
.0
:0.70 )-0
!"
!"

$

!62!!
( 7-

-9
7 //0
!"
!"

$3
612$!
( >*
>'

!"
!"

$3$ 3

(
''*>7

!"
!"

$3 6
!6!266
( -7585/4).00
,-
0 !"
!"

$3

2 ( (0,-
00?4-0).5
!"
!"

$36 63!21$
(
@
'
//
!"
!"

$3
$
!2$

( 54)-.<
-).-):
!"
!"

$33
2 ( 0 )0
8-0
//
!"
!"

$31 $!213
( 0
/>.'
!"
!"

$3! 6

( 0 .0
)-0

.
-54).<
!"
!"

$3

2 ( 7-:754).
</40

!"
!"

$1

$
21
( 74).
5 )0
-)2
!"
!"

$1$ 1
2$!
( -)<554).<
0</-):A; .0 ) :00).
!"
!"

$1 36121

( -

!"
!"

$1 $
621

( & ) 4

-0
!"
!"

$16 $2$
( 9
A

//
!"
!"

$1

2 ( /2)'
A
!"
!"

$13 $$23
( /
B
CA.'

'
!"
!"

$11 3
3 2

( --5)/-)0)A4)-,5

!"
!"

$1!
$2!

( (0). /55/
!"
!"

$1 $62

( 5.-4
!"
!"

$!
21$
(
. */

!"
!"

$!$
$2
3 ( -). -/- :-):
!"
!"

$! 12

(
5) 4.5(0. -/
!"
!"

$! 3

2 (
+
/'>@

!"
!"

$!6
$2

(
D**'

:'
!"
!"

$!

2 ( -/80
. .0-).0
) .-5) /
!"
!"

$!3 $
2

( 54.70
) /-,5
)- 0(-5)
!"
!"

$!1 $
!26
( .080E 4.5A.
49
.
!"
!"

$!! !1$2
!
( .707
.,5
(
!"
!"

$! 632

( .70
(
75
!"
!"

$
$

( .
- (75/0 5- .0
!"
!"

$$ 1
12!1
( 4)(0
:
54)(0
8-0 /0
.
!"
!"

$
2 ( 4
/'

!"
!"

$ $!
2 ( 80
-=5);-
0/0
!"
!"

$6 !
23 ( 8--5)0
8-0/ )
!"
!"

$
$263
4 104

!"
#
!"$"

%
!"
#
!"$"

%
&' (

(

)'*+ *'
( ;0.0
))08 ( 4/<52
!"
!"

$3 2

( ;
>0

!"
!"

$1 6
2

(. /-,5
)- . .0(-4
00).4)-.
!"$"

$! 32
(. 4 )9.
4.;0.0
)
0:-5)
!"$"

$

1 2
3 (
.-)0=
:-=0//0
!"$"

$6

6$2

(
*
!"$"

$6

$ $

2 (
0

!"$
"

$6

$
3
2 ( .A.+

//
!"$
"

$6

!132
( A9

!"$
"

$6

6 $

( -757 0
5,50
0
!"$
"

$6

6
2
( -75 -4.0.
- /
!"$
"

$6

3 6!2

( /0(
!"$
"

$6

1 2

( 0//0
-)2
!"$
"

$6

!

$2

( 7 //0):0
5
.
!"$
"

$6

2 ( 54)-.<
-).-):
!"$
"

$6
$
3!23
( (0 )E/4-):A70 .-):-)2
!"$
"

$6
$$
$2

( (0.5,&4.-0
!"$
"

$6
$ 2

( (0.5,; .0
)(5;0

!"$
"

$6
$

( (B@
-

!"$
"

$6
$6 $$2

( ,
5).-0

!"$
"

$6
$
62$
( 70.5

.-)0=
!"$
"

$6
$3 61
2
( -)<554).<
0</-):A; .0 ) :00).
!"$
"

$6
$1 $1
2 ( -

!"$
"

$6
$! 6!2

( 9-,
!"$
"

$6
$

2 ( /2)'
A
!"$
"

$6

$

623
( /-00
. -(<;7-.5
0 !"$
"

$6
$ 1132

( )5
.
408 /407
(;
0 !"$
"

$6
362!$
( --5)/-)0)A4)-,5

!"$
"

$6
!!21
(
292 4.55.-800
8-0-)2
!"$
"

$6
6 $
$!26
( '
@

!"$
"

$6

1 2!
( 54
; .0
;5
9
!"$
"

$6
3

2 ( 0..< 7
9(0.2
!"$
"

$6
1

2 ( 0..< 70;0
,4)(
!"$
"

$6
! $

2 (
. */

!"$
"

$6

1 2$!
( .
!"$
"

$6

!
2 ( 54.70
) /-,5
)- 0(-5)
!"$
"

$6
$
6326
( .70,0(4.5
0 !"$
"

$6
$32$

( . **
';
!"$
"

$6
33
2 ( 87 .*
-

!"$
"

$6
6 6
32

( .A.
!"$"

$6
3 $
2 ( -75 4.55.-800).0

!"$"

$6
1
12

( /-,5
)-
5 ( )(
!"$"

$6
! $
2

(
-7 0/4-)0.072
!"$"

$6
11!2

(
>'+

@
-
2 !"$"

$6
6 2

( 7'+//
!"$"

$6
6$
!2

( 5
(-5
-)
!"$"

$6
6

6231
( ,0(0F
!"$"

$6
6 62
( ,
5).-0

!"$"

$6
66 $21
( :
<-/--
!"$"

$6
6 6
2 ( 70.5

.-)0=
!"$"

$6
63 6
2 ( 9-,
!"$"

$6
61
3!2

( /2)'
A
!"$"

$6
6!
1
2$3
( )5
.
408 /407
(;
0 !"$"

$6
6 32!

( )5
: -)5
!"$"

$6

( 54
; .0
;5
9
!"$"

$6

2 (
7 0--<.0
!"$"

$6

23
( 0
0=?4 /-.<.-
0
!"$"

$6

3
2 (
0,0

0(0.-
!"$"

$6

6

2$!
5 105

"#
$
"#%#

&
"#
$
"#%#

&
'( )

)

*(+, !+(
)! -

"#
%#

%
/0
/
)!
!1*!231)43!.5
"#
%#

%
/ 6
0 )! 12374
*!5.81
*.!4).1*
"#
%#

%
6 %0%

)! 94
.:1*2.*4
"#
%#

%
"
06
)! ;
<4

"#
%#

/
0 ) 2*)4

7.55 74
=550
"#

%
/
/0
) !*3!*!
8
!*.1
"#

%
/% "6/0
) *!9!54

=!*
"#

%
/ /0/

) '!>1*
371!40
"#

%
/ / 60%
) 115

431*
"#

%
// " 0
6 ) !)4
!
'145=*
"#

%
/6 %0%

) !

454=
"#

%
/" /0/
) 4**.
'4

=
"#

%
/ %

0
) 4**.
>!
4*
"#

%
6 %

"%0
) )4

549.
"#

%
6% 6/0"%
)
2455

43 "#

%
6
"
0
) 1*)
!?1*
)1*19!*
"#

%
6 /0
)
!?4

!
.!*!
"#

%
6 /0
) 8.33
!54
"#

%
6 0%6
) 255*4

515!
"#

%
6/ %/
0 "
) 15!*)
123
"#

%
66 //0
) 7!94
31>
5!
4 "#

%
6" /0
%
) 1

34!?!*
"#

%
6 "0
) 51;)4*
.>4
"#

%
"

"0 6
) )1*)4
1 '4.!7
"#

%
"% " "0

) )12)!
455.13
"#

%
"
%6
0"

) 3
2454*
!5=!
"#

%
"
0"6
) 5!
>
)!.!
"#

%
"
0

) *133
!)4*4
"#

%
"
60%"
) )49.*4*3
!54!7
"#

%
"/ "0"

) )!9.
455!
=
"#

%
"6 "0
%
) '17*1*

!)=
"#

%
""
0

) *144

15.*
"#

%
"

/0"
) !

3.*4:
)254
"#

/% 0%
) 1
34
?4374!*.4
"#

%
%
06%
) 7.

.>
7!554
"#

%"0"
) ?
.7!
!!*)!

"0
)
4=*15)
'.
"#

%
/
6660

) ?
.7!
!!*)!

0
)
4=*15)
'.
"#

%
/

0"/
)3 !4
.!*8.)45.3=
"#

%
6 / 0

)3 !4
.!*8.)45.3=
"#

%
"

"/ 0

)3 1!
"#

%
%
/"
0 )3 !5.81
*.!3!34).2
44*32*.3
"#

/ 0

)3 14!
"#

%%
% 0

)3 !)4*3!5115
"#

)3 34@!5.84.*2
!*41!*=
"#

%%
%0
)3 3747!
381
)
"#

%%
%
660
6 )3 20
!
!

(A/6/

%%
%
6%0

)3 2!*>3
23;434
*
4?.1*
"#

%%
/ %
6"0
)3 2!*>3
23;434
*
4?.1*
"#

%%
6 06
)3 9..1*4

9.45!*
"#

%%
" /%0"
)3 3747!
381
)
"#
6#

%%
%

0
)! !
(

+(
55
"#
"#

%%%
%

0 )! !5.*4!.*318.71
"#
"#

%%%%
60
)! !

"#
"#

%%%
6""0

)! .719152*344
8.
4 "#
"#

%%%
0 )! 5!>1.*3550
"#
"#

%%% 0/

6 106

"#
$
"#%#

&
"#
$
"#%#

&
'( )

)

*(+, !+(
)!
1;*B25=
"#
"#

%%% %06
)! !*1*8.*!*.!54

9.4
"#
"#

%%%/

"6
0%
)! !
.7!452.*43470
"#
"#

%%%6 "
/%"0"

)! 7!58!*3.?3
448!

"#
"#

%%%" % 60
)! 12*.3=
.*3.*?
"#
"#

%%% 0

)! )
(
"#
"#

)! )4318'23.4
"#
"#

%%
% %
6/0

)! )4318;!34
!*)1;4

"#
"#

0 /
)! )4318;!34
!*)1;4

"#
"#

0 )! 45)
.)?44543
.C1*
"#
"#

%"06
)! 84)4@
"#
"#

%%
"0
)! 8
1*3.4

"#
"#

%%
/ 6 0

)! ?15)4*3!3444
?4*=
"#
"#

%%
6 0%

)! ?
(
5<0
"#
"#

%%
" %
/
60 )! 72*3
1!*4
.*0
"#
"#

%%
"0

)! .*=112*3=.*81
!3.1*4

9.4
"#
"#

%%

0%
)! '
"#
"#

%%% %/
% 0/

)! '172!455;1
37 "#
"#

%%
%/0%

)! 50*(
C
"#
"#

%% 6
%0
)! 5.44
3!.)=;7.31
4 "#
"#

%% %0

)! !*1
3
249!5247!
);!
4 "#
"#

%% 60

)! 58D
"#
"#

%%/ %
/0"
)! ..1*5.*4*C2*.81

"#
"#

%%6 /%0
)! !)4*3!5115
"#
"#

%%" %%%0
"
)! *41?19
"#
"#

%%
0%

)! 13.2
"#
"#

%%
%
0%"
)!
!1*!231)43!.5
"#
"#

%%%
0 )!

49.:4
55
"#
"#

0 )! 7
4)
1 .*
"#
"#

%% %
0

)! 3474*27194'
"#
"#

%% "0%

)! 3747!
381
)
"#
"#

%% 06
)! 3 ++
(;
"#
"#

%%/ //
0 )! 3
+(

<?)
"#
"#

%%6
6%0/
)! 94
.:1*;.
454
"#
"#

%%" %%0

)! 9..1*4

9.45!*
"#
"#

%% %
0/
)! ;434
**49!)!25=10
"#
"#

%%
60

)! ;
<4

"#
"#

%%% %
%%06
)! ;<
<.

"#
"#

) ).
43)41.3313!5
"#
"#

% %
/
0 %
) ).
43)41.3313!5
"#

%
6 6%0
)3 451=4*3)490)430
"#%
#

"
"

6 /0

)3 ?
4!3;435.84C!**2.3=
"#%
#

"
"

0"%
)3 .

"#%
#

"
"

/
/6 0"
)3 4

"#%
#

"
"

6
"/
0"
)3 4
)484

4)1
"#%
#

"
"

%
6
0
)3 !54
4).!5
"#

%60

)3 451=4*3)490)430
"#

% "

0

)3 ?
4!3;435.84C!**2.3=
"#

0"%
)3 .

"#

"
% 60"6
)3 4

"#

6
%%0

)3 4
)484

4)1
"#

%
6
0
?<3 %
6%

60
7 107
Agenda Item: 16.D
Date of Meeting: October 27, 2025
Department: Finance
To: City Council
From: Ethan Aukee
Subject: Administration Budget Adjustment Request
Prepared On: September 25, 2025

STAFF REPORT
Background/History:

The Public Works Secretary retired earlier this calendar year and the City decided to market the position of Engineering Technician rather than market the Public Works Secretary position. The Engineering Technician position will manage some of the existing secretary duties, with the remainder of duties managed by Administration and Finance. Currently, the two Administrative Support Assistants are fully covering their workloads prior to the Public Works Secretary retirement and the increased duties added to their workloads following the retirement.

The City planned for the Administrative Support Assistants' workloads to be increased, however, this change has been determined to be unsustainable. Unsustainability is not only based on the increased workload from the Public Works Secretary retirement but also increased workloads in supporting the Planning Department and the Fire Department.

The City has analyzed the current workload structure and has determined that the most effective and efficient method of addressing the unsustainable current configuration is to seek to hire a part-time Office Assistant. This position is included in the City's salary schedule.

Analysis/Discussion:

The effect on the FY 2025-26 budget is included in the budget section of this staff report.

Economic Impacts:

No significant economic impacts.

Budget Impacts:

This position is not budgeted, and the below budget adjustment would be required to proceed in hiring a part-time Office Assistant.
001-011-51002 (Administration, Part-Time Wages) 24,000.00 001-011-51011 (Medicare Tax) 360.00
001-011-51017 (PARS-ARS) 324.00
108
The net change in the General Fund budget is an increase in spending in the amount of $24,684.00.

Legal Review:

City Attorney Pucci has reviewed this item and finds that the recommended action complies with the law.

Recommended Action:

City Council consideration to approve the proposed budget adjustment.

Approved By: Ethan Aukee 9/25/2025
Approved By: Robin Picken 9/25/2025
Approved By: Pam Foster 10/13/2025
Approved By:
109
Agenda Item: 16.E
Date of Meeting: October 27, 2025
Department: Finance
To: City Council
From: Ethan Aukee
Subject: 2024-25 Grant in Support Reimbursement Claims Made Prepared On: September 30, 2025

STAFF REPORT
Background/History:

Three claims were made for reimbursement on 2024-25 Grant in Support Program projects between the end of August and the end of September. Based on the grant agreements, September 30th is the final day for submission. The City's accrual period ends on August 30th, so the expenses associated with these claims are no longer permitted to be accrued to FY 2024-25 and therefore would need to be expensed in FY 2025-26.

In order to allow for reimbursement payment to be made pursuant to the grant agreements, approval for appropriation and a budget adjustment are needed and being requested.

Analysis/Discussion:

The three projects combined qualify for up to $32,000.00 of reimbursement, therefore, a $32,000.00 spending increase budget adjustment is being requested. This spending was appropriated in 2024-25, but the associated expense was not incurred, resulting in unspent approved spending in 2024-25 and the need for this budget adjustment in 2025-26.

Moving forward, the City will consider aligning the deadline for grant submissions with the end of its accrual period.

Economic Impacts:

None.

Budget Impacts:
$32,000.00 increase in expense budget, GL account 001-019-52131.

The $32,000.00 was intended to be spent in the prior year, but the liability for the City to reimburse the grantees was not established until after the FY 2024-25 accrual period.

Legal Review:

City Attorney Pucci has reviewed this item and finds that the recommended action complies with the law.
110
Recommended Action:

City Council to authorize $32,000.00 in increased spending within GL account 001-019-52131 in fiscal year 2025-26.

Approved By: Ethan Aukee 9/30/2025
Approved By: Robin Picken 10/2/2025
Approved By: Pam Foster 10/13/2025
Approved By:
111
Agenda Item: 16.F
Date of Meeting: October 27, 2025
Department: City Clerk
To: City Council
From: Robin Picken
Subject: Granicus Agreement – Three-Year Extension 11/12/2025-11/11/2028 Prepared On: October 10, 2025
Attachments: Granicus Agreement 2018-2021
Granicus Proposed Agreement for 11 12 2025 - 11 11 2028

STAFF REPORT
Background/History:

The City of Bishop has contracted with Granicus since May of 2014 to provide the citizens of Bishop with a transparent and open meeting platform to view the City of Bishop’s City Council, City Commissions, and other City related meetings, their posted agendas, and approved minutes.

To date, City staff feels that Granicus has performed their services in a satisfactory manner.

Since the purchase and implementation of Granicus' agenda management solution (PEAK Agenda Management) in 2023, meeting agenda production has become more efficient.

Analysis/Discussion:

The City’s current agreement with Granicus was effective November 12, 2018 to November 11, 2021 and upon mutual written agreement, the term of this agreement can be extended annually for an additional one (1) year period, or longer as the parties agree .

The Council approved a one (1) year extension for 2021-2022, 2022-2023, 2023-2024, and on October 28, 2024, the City Council approved the Granicus Agreement – One-Year Extension 11/12/2024-11/11/2025 with an annual cost of $15,258.31.

The Council now has the opportunity to approve the attached Granicus Subscription Renewal for current services provided for the next three years, with an increase of seven percent each year as follows.

November 12, 2025 to November 11, 2026 = $16,326.39
November 12, 2026 to November 11, 2027 = $17,469.24
112
November 12, 2027 to November 11, 2028 = $18,692.10
Total for three years = $52,487.73
Economic Impacts:

There is no significant economic impact.

Budget Impacts:

The current annual cost to the City is $15,258.31.

If the Council approves the proposed Granicus Subscription Renewal for the current services provided for the next three years, there will be an increase of seven percent each year due annually as follows:

November 12, 2025 to November 11, 2026 = $16,326.39
November 12, 2026 to November 11, 2027 = $17,469.24
November 12, 2027 to November 11, 2028 = $18,692.10
Legal Review:

Legal review is not necessary for this agenda item.

Recommended Action:

Council consideration to approve the proposed Granicus Subscription Renewal for the current services provided from November 12, 2025 to November 11, 2028 as presented, with a total cost of $52,487.73.

Approved By: Ethan Aukee 10/10/2025
Approved By: Robin Picken 10/13/2025
Approved By: Pam Foster 10/13/2025
Approved By:
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE Order Form
Prepared for
Bishop, CA
Order #: Q-489944
Prepared: 09 Oct 2025

Page 1 of 8 ends

Granicus Proposal for Bishop, CA

ORDER DETAILS
Prepared By: Dilana Vargas
Phone:

Email: [email protected]
Order #: Q-489944
Prepared On: 09 Oct 2025
Expires On: 11 Nov 2025
Currency: USD
Payment Terms: Net 30 (Payments for subscriptions are due at the beginning of the period of performance.)

Period of Performance: 12 Nov 2025 - 11 Nov 2026

ORDER TERMS
Current Subscription
End Date:

Initial Order Term End
Date:
11 Nov 2025
11 Nov 2028
135
Order Form
Bishop, CA
Order #: Q-489944
Prepared: 09 Oct 2025

Page 2 of 8 ends

PRICING SUMMARY
The pricing and terms within this Proposal are specific to the products and volumes contained within this Proposal.

Renewing Subscription Fees
Solution Billing
Frequency Quantity/Unit Annual Fee
Government Transparency Suite Annual 1 Each $5,025.99
Peak Agenda Management Annual 1 Each $3,778.17
Granicus Encoding Appliance Software
(GT) Annual 1 Each $1,675.33
Meeting Efficiency Suite Annual 1 Each $3,350.65
Open Platform Suite Annual 1 Each $2,496.25
Send Agenda (Peak) Annual 1 Each $0.00
govDelivery for Integrations Annual 1 Each $0.00
SUBTOTAL: $16,326.39
136
Order Form
Bishop, CA
Order #: Q-489944
Prepared: 09 Oct 2025

Page 3 of 8 ends

FUTURE YEAR PRICING
Period of Performance
Solution(s)
12 Nov 2026 - 11 Nov 2027 12 Nov 2027 - 11 Nov 2028
Government Transparency Suite $5,377.81 $5,754.26
Peak Agenda Management $4,042.64 $4,325.63
Granicus Encoding Appliance Software (GT) $1,792.60 $1,918.09 Meeting Efficiency Suite $3,585.20 $3,836.16
Open Platform Suite $2,670.99 $2,857.96
Send Agenda (Peak) $0.00 $0.00
govDelivery for Integrations $0.00 $0.00
SUBTOTAL: $17,469.24 $18,692.10
137
Order Form
Bishop, CA
Order #: Q-489944
Prepared: 09 Oct 2025

Page 4 of 8 ends

PRODUCT UPDATES

FOR INFORMATION ON RECENT AND UPCOMING PRODUCT ENHANCEMENTS ACROSS THE GRANICUS PORTFOLIO, PLEASE REFER TO THE SEMIANNUAL UPDATE INFORMATION ON THIS WEBPAGE:
: HTTPS://GRANICUS.COM/SEMIANNUAL-UPDATES/

PRODUCT DESCRIPTIONS
Solution Description
Government Transparency
Suite
Government Transparency are the live in-meeting functions. Streaming of an event, pushing of documents, and indexing of events.

Peak Agenda Management Peak Agenda Management is a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) solution that enables government organizations to simplify the agenda management and minutes recording process of the clerk’s office. Peak Agenda Management allows clerks to streamline the way they compile and produce agendas and record minutes for public meetings and includes:
• Unlimited user accounts
• Unlimited meeting bodies and meeting types
• Access to up to one (1) Peak Agenda Management site
Granicus Encoding Appliance
Software (GT)
Granicus Encoding Appliance Software (GT) This includes the LiveManager Software solution where webcasts are started/stopped, agendas amended and indexed, votes and attendance recorded, and minutes created.

Meeting Efficiency Suite Meeting Efficiency is a hybrid Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) and Hardwareas-a-Service (HaaS) solution that enables government organizations to simplify the in-meeting management and post-meeting minutes creation processes of the clerk’s office. By leveraging this solution, the client will be able to streamline meeting data capture and minutes production, reducing staff efforts and decreasing time to get minutes published. During a meeting, use LiveManager to record roll calls, motions, votes, notes, and speakers, all indexed with video. Use the index points to quickly edit minutes, templates to format in Microsoft Word, and publish online with the click of a button. Meeting Efficiency includes:
• Unlimited user accounts
• Unlimited meeting bodies
• Unlimited storage of minutes documents
• Access to the LiveManager software application for recording information during meetings
138
Order Form
Bishop, CA
Order #: Q-489944
Prepared: 09 Oct 2025

Page 5 of 8 ends

Solution Description
• Access to the Word Add-in software component for minutes formatting in MS Word if desired
• Up to one (1) MS Word minutes template (additional templates can be purchased if needed)
Open Platform Suite Open Platform is access to MediaManager, upload of archives, ability to post agendas/documents, and index of archives. These are able to be published and accessible through a searchable viewpage.

Send Agenda (Peak) Send Agenda is dependent on an active subscription to the relevant govMeetings agenda.
govDelivery for Integrations Send notification bulletins directly to constituents who subscribe to receive updates directly through Granicus (powered by govDelivery). Receive a monthly metrics report delivered via email to show subscriber growth and engagement activity for the past month of bulletin sends, and grow subscribers through access to the Granicus Advanced Network.

Note: govDelivery integrations is dependent on an active subscription to the relevant govMeetings agenda or govAccess CMS solutions.

GRANICUS ADVANCED NETWORK AND SUBSCRIBER INFORMATION
• Granicus Communications Suite Subscriber Information. o Data provided by the Client and contact information gathered through the Client's own web properties or activities will remain the property of the Client ('Direct Subscriber'), including any and all personally identifiable information (PII). Granicus will not release the data without the express written permission of the Client, unless required by law. o Granicus shall: (i) not disclose the Client's data except to any third parties as necessary to operate the Granicus Products and Services (provided that the Client hereby grants to Granicus a perpetual, non-cancelable, worldwide, non-exclusive license to utilize any data, on an anonymous or aggregate basis only, that arises from the use of the Granicus Products by the Client, whether disclosed on, subsequent to, or prior to the Effective Date, to improve the functionality of the Granicus Products and any other legitimate business purpose, including the right to sublicense such data to third parties, subject to all legal restrictions regarding the use and disclosure of such information).
• Data obtained through the Granicus Advanced Network.
o Granicus offers a SaaS product, known as the Communications Cloud, that offers Direct Subscribers recommendations to subscribe to other Granicus Client's digital communication (the 'Advanced Network'). When a Direct Subscriber signs up through one of the recommendations of the Advanced Network, that subscriber is a 'Network Subscriber' to the agency it subscribed to through the Advanced Network.
o Network Subscribers are available for use while the Client is under an active subscription with 139
Order Form
Bishop, CA
Order #: Q-489944
Prepared: 09 Oct 2025

Page 6 of 8 ends

Granicus. Network Subscribers will not transfer to the Client upon termination of any Granicus Order, SOW, or Exhibit. The Client shall not use or transfer any of the Network Subscribers after termination of its Order, SOW, or Exhibit placed under this agreement. All information related to Network Subscribers must be destroyed by the Client within 15 calendar days of the Order, SOW, or Exhibit placed under this agreement terminating. o Opt-In. During the last 10 calendar days of the Client's subscription, the Client may send an optin email to Network Subscribers that shall include an explanation of the Client's relationship with Granicus terminating and that the Network Subscribers may visit the Client's website to subscribe to further updates from the Client in the future. Any Network Subscriber that does not opt-in will not be transferred with the subscriber list provided to the Client upon termination. 140
Order Form
Bishop, CA
Order #: Q-489944
Prepared: 09 Oct 2025

Page 7 of 8 ends

TERMS & CONDITIONS
• This quote, and all products and services delivered hereunder are governed by the terms located at https://granicus.com/legal/licensing, including any product-specific terms included therein (the “License Agreement”). If your organization and Granicus has entered into a separate agreement or is utilizing a contract vehicle for this transaction, the terms of the License Agreement are incorporated into such separate agreement or contract vehicle by reference, with any directly conflicting terms and conditions being resolved in favor of the separate agreement or contract vehicle to the extent applicable. • If submitting a Purchase Order, please include the following language: The pricing, terms and conditions of quote Q-489944 dated 09 Oct 2025 are incorporated into this Purchase Order by reference and shall take precedence over any terms and conditions included in this Purchase Order. • This quote is exclusive of applicable state, local, and federal taxes, which, if any, will be included in the invoice.

It is the responsibility of Bishop, CA to provide applicable exemption certificate(s). • Any lapse in payment may result in suspension of service and will require the payment of a setup fee to reinstate the subscription.
141
Order Form
Bishop, CA
Order #: Q-489944
Prepared: 09 Oct 2025

Page 8 of 8 ends

BILLING INFORMATION
Billing Contact: Purchase Order
Required?
[ ] - No
[ ] - Yes
Billing Address: PO Number:

If PO required
Billing Email: Billing Phone:

If submitting a Purchase Order, please include the following language:

The pricing, terms, and conditions of quote Q-489944 dated 09 Oct 2025 are incorporated into this Purchase Order by reference and shall take precedence over any terms and conditions included in this Purchase Order.

AGREEMENT AND ACCEPTANCE
By signing this document, the undersigned certifies they have authority to enter the agreement. The undersigned also understands the services and terms.

Bishop, CA
Signature:
\s1\
Name:
\n1\
Title:
\t1\
Date:
\d1\
142
Parking Enforcement Officer P/T Page 1

CITY OF BISHOP

POLICE DEPARTMENT
Parking Enforcement Officer

DEFINITION
Under general supervision, patrols assigned areas by vehicle, bicycle, and on foot to enforce City of Bishop Municipal Code and California Vehicle Code parking regulations.

Issues citations and warnings, coordinates towing/impound when authorized, responds to citizen inquiries and complaints, testifies in court, and performs related clerical and field duties that support orderly parking, traffic safety, and downtown/business district turnover.

This is a civilian, non-sworn position emphasizing education, voluntary compliance, and professional customer service while maintaining consistent, impartial enforcement.

SUPERVISION RECEIVED AND EXERCISED
• Receives general supervision from a Police Sergeant or Corporal.

EXAMPLE OF DUTIES
The duties listed below are examples of the work typically performed by employees of thisclass. An employee may not be assigned all duties listed and may be assigned duties which are not listed below. Marginal duties are those which are least likely essential functions for any single position in this class. • Patrols designated zones (downtown, business corridors, residential permit areas, special events) to identify and address parking violations. • Issues parking citations and warnings using handheld devices; documents violations with photos and notes.
• Enforces time limits, loading zones, handicap/disabled placards, signed restrictions, curb rules, and temporary restrictions.
• Coordinates authorized tows/impounds; completes and processes related forms. • Responds to and resolves parking-related complaints and inquiries; provides directions and information to the public.
• Operates department vehicles, radios, body-worn cameras, and handheld citation writers.
• Prepares reports; collects and preserves evidence; appears and testifies in court. • Conducts parking surveys, signage/curb paint checks; reports hazards or faded markings.
• Supports Police Department with non-enforcement duties as assigned, including traffic control, found property, and public education.
143
Parking Enforcement Officer P/T Page 2

QUALIFICATIONS
Knowledge of:
• Municipal and California Vehicle Code parking regulations and enforcement practices.
• City of Bishop ordinances relevant to parking and traffic safety. • Principles of exceptional customer service and conflict de-escalation. • Use of handheld citation devices, body-worn cameras, and related technology.

Ability to:
• Interpret and apply laws, ordinances, and posted restrictions consistently and impartially.
• Communicate clearly and respectfully in person and in writing. • Exercise sound judgment when handling confrontational situations or working independently.
• Establish and maintain effective working relationships with coworkers, businesses, residents, and visitors.
• Safely operate a City vehicle and work outdoors in varying weather conditions.

Skill to:
• Understand and carry out both oral and written directions. • On a continuous basis, know and understand operations and observe safety rules. • On a continuous basis, sit and stand for extended periods of time. • Traverse uneven terrain, periodically standing, stooping, bending, climbing, and kneeling to perform site inspections.
• Working in exposure to various weather conditions.
• Normal vision to read handwritten and printed material and a computer screen. • Learn to interpret and apply rules, regulations, and ordinances relating to police operations.
• Use a computer, calculator, telephone, photocopy machine and camera. • Analyze situations quickly, calmly, and objectively and to determine proper course of action.
• Safely and effectively perform duties.
• Establish and maintain effective working relationships with those contacted in the performance of required duties.
• Communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing. 144
Parking Enforcement Officer P/T Page 3

EDUCATION, EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING GUIDELINES
Any combination of education, experience and training that would likely provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain the knowledge and abilities would be:

Education:
• High school graduate or equivalent.

Experience and Training:
• One year of customer service, code/parking enforcement, or related public contact experience preferred.

Special Requirements:
• At least 18 years of age.
• Must possess or obtain by appointment date a valid driver’s license issued by the state of California.
• Must successfully complete a pre-employment background investigation and physical.
• Bilingual Preferred.

PHYSICAL, MENTAL AND EMOTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
The physical demands described here and in the job analysis are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions.
• Hearing Standard: normal hearing
• Frequent walking/standing, including extended foot patrol; occasional bending, kneeling, reaching, and lifting up to 25 lbs. Exposure to outdoor conditions, traffic, and potential confrontational situations with the public. • Requires maintaining composure and professionalism in all interactions.

WORK ENVIRONMENT
The work environment characteristics described here are representative of those an employee encounters while performing the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions.
• While performing the duties of this job, the employee frequently works in outside weather conditions, which may include extreme cold, windy and other wintery conditions. The employee is occasionally exposed to wet and/or humid conditions, extreme cold, and extreme heat. The noise level in the work environment is usually moderate.
145
Parking Enforcement Officer P/T Page 4

SELECTION GUIDELINES
Formal application, rating of education and experience; oral interview and reference checks; job related tests may be required.

This classification is not intended to be all-inclusive. An employee may be required to perform other reasonable duties as assigned by management. The City reserves the right, with the concurrence of the department head, to revise or change classification duties and responsibilities as the need arises and as consistent with the meet and confer process.

Approved by Council:
146
Job Description and
Essential Function Analysis
Job Title: Parking Enforcement Officer Department: Police Agency: City of Bishop Position Summary:

Under general supervision, patrols assigned areas by vehicle, bicycle, and on foot to enforce City of Bishop Municipal Code and California Vehicle Code parking regulations. Issues citations and warnings, coordinates towing/impound when authorized, responds to citizen inquiries and complaints, testifies in court, and performs related clerical and field duties that support orderly parking, traffic safety, and downtown/business district turnover. This is a civilian, non-sworn position emphasizing education, voluntary compliance, and professional customer service while maintaining consistent, impartial enforcement.

Employment and Work Conditions:

Type of employment X Regular  Temp/Seasonal Full-time X Part-time X At Will  Contract Competitive service  Yes X No FLSA status  Exempt X Non-Exempt Bargaining unit
Salary or pay range Pay differential, incentives, specialty pay, etc.

Work setting Outside, vehicle and office Attire Department Polo Workdays Monday-Sunday Location Police Department Exposure to others Co-workers and public Work hours Various Supervisor Sergeant or Corporal Driving required X Yes (check type below)  No Core hours 0700-1800 Supervises N/A X Class C  Commercial Overtime required Rarely Travel required  Yes X No Weekends required YES
Pre-employment tests Required Comments
Pre-placement exam  Yes X No
Pre-employment medical
exam
 Yes X No
Live Scan, criminal record X Yes  No
Other:  Yes X No
147
Job Description and Essential Function Analysis Job Title: Parking Enforcement Officer October 2019 California JPIA Page 2 of 9
Job Duties and Functions:

Cells will auto adjust for length of content; additional rows can be added.

Essential:

Yes/No Frequency
(Use key)

1. Patrol: Patrol assigned areas and identify and issue citations to vehicles in violation of appropriate codes, laws, ordinances and regulations pertaining to on-street and public parking. Respond to public complaints of abandoned vehicles; tag vehicles after investigating vehicle status; arrange for the towing of vehicles if not removed within the specified time frame. May chalk tires of vehicles parked in unmetered spaces, record time, and return at specified intervals to ticket vehicles remaining in spaces illegally.

Yes Constant

2. Citation Issuance: Patrol assigned areas and identify and issue citations to vehicles in violation of appropriate codes, laws, ordinances and regulations pertaining to on-street and public parking. Turn in citations issued at end of shift.

Yes Occasional

3. Reports: Provide written documentation related to parking violations and citations as required. Maintain records related to work performed.

Yes Occasional

4. Vehicle Maintenance: Maintain vehicle fluid levels. Wash and sweep vehicle. May drive vehicle to local repair shop. Yes Seldom Field Reporting: Monitor and report parking signing and marking problems to appropriate repair staff. Yes Seldom

5. Driving / Travel:

Drives City vehicle during course of Duty.

Yes Frequent
Frequency: Never – Does not occur; Seldom – Less than 30 minutes per shift; Occasional – From 1/16 to 1/3 of a shift, or .5 hours to 2.5 hours of an 8-hour day; Frequent – From 1/3 to 2/3 of a shift, or

2.6 to 5.2 hours per 8-hour day; Constant – More than 2/3 of a shift, or more than 5.3 hours per 8 hour day 148
Job Description and Essential Function Analysis Job Title: Parking Enforcement Officer October 2019 California JPIA Page 3 of 9
Qualifications and Requirements:

Cells will automatically adjust for length of content; additional rows can be added. Required Preferred

1. Education (level of education needed to successfully accomplish the essential functions of the job):

Equivalent to the completion of the twelfth (12th) grade. X

2. Experience (level of experience required to start job position and successfully accomplish the essential functions of the job):

One (1) year of customer service, code/parking enforcement, security, or related public contact experience preferred. X

3. Skills:

Read, interpret, and apply parking codes and ordinances. Preparing and maintaining organized and accurate records. Use sound independent judgment within established guidelines. Deal tactfully and effectively with those encountered in the course of the work including hostile and irate citizens. Communicate effectively both verbally and in writing. Establish and maintain effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of the work.

4. Knowledge of:

Departmental practices and procedures and applicable City policies. Safe work methods and safety regulations pertaining to the work, including driving habits. Basic English language usage and legible handwriting. Basic record-keeping principles and practices.

5. Ability to:

6. Job-related licenses, certifications, and/or designations:

Valid California driver’s license. X

7. Attendance X

8. Security clearances

9. Criminal record complies with agency’s Live Scan Policy or other policies (including out-of-state records) X

10. Language(s) X

11. Transportation personal vehicle X agency-owned vehicle  public transportation X

12. Automobile liability insurance complies with agency’s Vehicle Usage Policy X

13. Driving record acceptable per the agency’s Vehicle Usage Policy X

14. Enrollment in agency’s DMV EPN (Employer Pull Notice) program X

15. Credit history acceptable per the agency’s fiduciary, finance or accounting policies

16. Continuing education and training relevant to successfully accomplish the essential functions of the job X 149
Job Description and Essential Function Analysis Job Title: Parking Enforcement Officer

Page 4 of 9 ends

Essential Function Analysis
Key: Frequency: The amount of time or number of times per work period that a task is performed Never – Does not occur
Seldom – Less than 30 minutes per shift
Occasional – From 1/16 to 1/3 of a shift, or .5 hours to 2.5 hours of an 8-hour day Frequent – From 1/3 to 2/3 of a shift, or 2.6 to 5.2 hours per 8-hour day Constant – More than 2/3 of a shift, or more than 5.3 hours per 8 hour day Occurrence: How often activity or task is performed
Daily – Occurs regularly
Intermittent – Task performed several times throughout the day Periodic – Not done on a daily basis
Duration: The length of time a task or activity is performed during a session Essential Non-Essential (optional)
Essential Frequency Occurrence Frequency Occurrence
A. Physical Demands Y N N S O F C D I P Duration N S O F C D I P Duration Comments

1. Sit X X X Up to 3 hrs.

2. Stand X X X Up to 3 Hrs.

3. Walk flat or level terrain X X X Up to 15 min.
uneven terrain X X X Up to 3 hrs.
4a. Lift up to 10 pounds X X X Seconds
Above 11 – 25 pounds X
Shoulder 26 – 40 pounds X
41 – 55 pounds X
56 – 75 pounds X
>75 pounds
4b. Lift up to 10 pounds X X X Seconds
at Waist 11 – 25 pounds X X X Seconds
or Chest 26 – 40 pounds X
41 – 55 pounds X
56 – 75 pounds X
>75 pounds X
150
Job Description and Essential Function Analysis Job Title: Parking Enforcement Officer

Page 5 of 9 ends

Essential Non-Essential (optional)
Essential Frequency Occurrence Frequency Occurrence
A. Physical Demands Y N N S O F C D I P Duration N S O F C D I P Duration Comments 4c. Lift up to 10 pounds X X X Seconds
Below 11 – 25 pounds X X X Seconds
Waist 26 – 40 pounds X X
41 – 55 pounds X X
56 – 75 pounds X X
>75 pounds X X

5. Carry up to 10 pounds X X X Up to 2 min. Up to 50 feet List 11 – 25 pounds X X X Up to 2 min. Up to 2 feet
distance 26 – 40 pounds X X X Seconds
In 41 – 55 pounds X
comments 56 – 75 pounds X
>75 pounds X

6. Push X X X Seconds

7. Pull X X X Seconds

8. Twist X X X Seconds

9. Bend X X X Seconds

10. Stoop X X X Seconds

11. Kneel X X X Up to 2 min.

12. Crawl X

13. Crouch X X X Seconds

14. Squat X X X Seconds

15. Climb (stairs, steps, ladder) X X X Seconds

16. Run X

17. Jump X

18. Lie down (stomach, side, back) X

19. Balance X X X Seconds

20. Neck extension X X X Up to 2 min.
flexion X X X Up to 5 min.
turning X X X Seconds

21. Upper Extremity Activities
a. Reach at, below shoulders X X X Up to 20 min.
above shoulders X X X Seconds
b. Grasp simple X X X Up to 20 min.
power X X
c. Manipulate gross X X X Up to 2 min.
fine X X X Up to 2 min.
151
Job Description and Essential Function Analysis Job Title: Parking Enforcement Officer

Page 6 of 9 ends

Essential Non-Essential (optional)
Essential Frequency Occurrence Frequency Occurrence
A. Physical Demands Y N N S O F C D I P Duration N S O F C D I P Duration Comments d. Keyboard and mouse X X Up to 1
hours.

22. Foot controls X X X

23. Stamina, endurance X X X
Essential Non-Essential (optional)
Essential Frequency Occurrence Frequency Occurrence
B. Mental and Psychological
Demands Y N N S O F C D I P N S O F C D I P Comments

1. Comprehend and follow
instructions
X X X

2. Perform and complete assigned
tasks
X X X

3. Maintain work pace X X X

4. Perform complex or varied tasks X X X

5. Relate to others X X X

6. Advise, counsel, influence X

7. Train or give instruction X X X

8. Work independently X X X

9. Plan, direct, control, supervise X

10. Supervise employees X

11. Supervise non-employees X

12. Represent the agency X X X

13. Interacting with the public X X X

14. Assume responsibility for
persons or property
X X X

15. Participate in team or group
activities
X X X

16. Work around traffic, crowds,
distractions
X X X

17. 18.
152
Job Description and Essential Function Analysis Job Title: Parking Enforcement Officer

Page 7 of 9 ends

Essential Non-Essential (optional)
Essential Frequency Occurrence Frequency Occurrence
C. Environmental Exposures Y N N S O F C D I P Duration N S O F C D I P Duration Comments

1. Work indoors X X X Up to 2.5
hrs.

2. Work outdoors X X X X Up to 5 hrs.

3. Driving X X X Up to 1 hrs.

4. Heights X

5. Lighting extremes X X

6. Temperature extremes
(give ranges)
X X Seasonal temperatures
can be above 100 degrees
and below 40 degrees

7. Airborne contaminants
(pollen, smog, smoke, dust)
X X

8. Gas, fumes, odors X X

9. Electrical X

10. Water X

11. Biohazard X

12. HazMat
(includes solvents, ammonia, lead,
asbestosis, paint, welding,
corrosives)
X

13. Flammable, combustible X

14. Noise (above 85dB) X

15. Vibration X

16. Explosives X

17. 18.
153
Job Description and Essential Function Analysis Job Title: Parking Enforcement Officer

Page 8 of 9 ends

Essential Non-Essential (optional)
Essential Frequency Occurrence Frequency Occurrence
Comments
Identify for which function each is required
D. Communication and
Sensory Demands Y N N S O F C D I P N S O F C D I P

1. Sight X X X 1,2,3,4,5

2. Smell X

3. Hearing X X X 1,2,3,4,5

4. Taste X

5. Tactile, touch (e.g., hot, texture) X

6. Speaking X X X X 1,2,3,4

7. Reading X X X 1,2,3,4,5

8. Writing (inc. keyboarding) X X X 1,2,3,4
Essential Non-Essential (optional)
Essential Frequency Occurrence Frequency Occurrence
E. Equipment, Vehicles,
Machinery Y N N S O F C D I P Duration N S O F C D I P Duration Comments

1. Office keyboard X X X Up to 30 min.
equipment copier, fax X X X Up to 10 min.
telephone, cell X X X Up to 20 min.
pen, stapler, etc. X X X Up to 2 min.
postage, binding X

2. Hand tools X X X

3. Safety equipment/PPE X X X

4. Private passenger vehicle X Up to 10 min.

5. Golf cart, utility vehicle X

6. Motorcycle, bicycle X

7. Light utility vehicle or truck X X X

8. Heavy utility vehicle X

9. Earthmoving equipment X

10. Construction equipment X

11. Transit equipment X

12. Landscaping equipment X

13. 14.
154
Job Description and Essential Function Analysis Job Title: Parking Enforcement Officer

Page 9 of 9 ends

Completed by: N. Derr Title: Chief of Police
Company: City of Bishop
Signature: ____________________________________ Date: _______________________________________ Employer Representatives:

Name: Pam Foster Title: City Administrator
Company: City of Bishop
Signature: ________________________________________ Date: ________________________________________ 155

CITY OF BISHOP

PUBLIC WORKS
Engineering Technician I/II/III
Public Works Engineering Technician II/III Page 1 of 5
Job Description, June 2025

DEFINITION
This position supports the planning, development, and delivery of small- to medium-scale public works projects, with a focus on road maintenance, permit administration, procurement, and consultant coordination. The position performs both technical and administrative work, including infrastructure condition assessment, quantity takeoffs, cost estimating, construction bid document preparation, and coordination with consultants and contractors. This role increases the department’s capacity to deliver pavement maintenance and minor capital improvement projects with limited staff resources.

Assignment level and duties will vary depending on qualifications and departmental needs. Higher classifications may include greater independence in project delivery, grant management, or contract oversight.

SUPERVISION RECEIVED AND EXERCISED
• Receives general supervision from Public Works Director

EXAMPLE OF DUTIES
Duties may include, but are not limited to, the following:

Project Planning and Delivery
• Use pavement condition data to prioritize road and sidewalk maintenance projects. • Conduct field reviews to verify conditions and define project scopes. • Prepare cost estimates, quantities, and budgets for maintenance-level construction projects (e.g., overlays, slurry, striping), under the direction of the Director.
• Develop bid packages, including technical specifications, maps, and contract documents.
• Support consultants by providing field data, record drawings, and project background; assist in preparing construction bid documents for Director review.

Permit and Right-of-Way Administration
• Manage public works-related permits, including encroachment permits, water fill stem agreements, and grading permits.
• Coordinate application intake, fee processing, plan review, field inspection, and closeout.
• Coordinate with property owners to resolve private encroachments (e.g., fences, landscaping) within the public right-of-way.
156
Public Works Engineering Technician II/III Page 2 of 5
Job Description, October 2025
• Interpret right-of-way boundaries using maps or deeds and maintain related records.

Procurement and Contract Support
• Prepare scopes and solicit quotes for materials, equipment, and services in accordance with City purchasing policies.
• Assist with writing technical specifications and developing project-specific bid documents.
• Maintain up-to-date field documentation, as-built markups, and technical files using Laserfiche and GIS platforms.

Capital Improvement and Grant Coordination
• Support development of capital project documentation and updates at the direction of the Director.
• Support grant applications, obligation tracking, and reimbursement requests for eligible projects.

Technical Program Support
• Assist with planning and conducting pre-bid site visits to review project conditions and answer contractor questions
• Review contractor work in the field for compliance with City standards. • Inspect completed concrete, asphalt, and drainage improvements; prepare punch lists and verify quantities.
• Assist with field adjustments, plan clarifications, and construction documentation. • Respond to public inquiries and service complaints.

QUALIFICATIONS
The Public Works Project Coordinator possesses the following qualifications or their equivalent:

Knowledge of:
• Public works construction methods, materials, and field practices • Basic civil engineering concepts and terminology related to roadways, sidewalks, and utilities
• Public agency contracting and procurement processes
• Standard plans, specifications, and right-of-way documentation • Regulatory requirements related to encroachment, grading, and permitting • Standard construction specifications such as Caltrans Standard Plans and Greenbook standards
157
Public Works Engineering Technician II/III Page 3 of 5
Job Description, October 2025
Skills in:
• Preparing cost estimates, scopes of work, and bid packages • Organizing and maintaining permit and project records • Using software such as Microsoft Word, Excel, GIS, and document management platforms (e.g., Laserfiche)
• Communicating clearly and professionally, both verbally and in writing • Managing time and multiple tasks effectively under minimal supervision • Reviewing field conditions and verifying contractor compliance with specifications Ability to:
• Read and interpret engineering plans, technical drawings, and maps • Conduct field reviews and document infrastructure conditions accurately • Coordinate with contractors, consultants, property owners, and other departments • Understand and apply City policies, procedures, and applicable codes • Track project deadlines, deliverables, and financial information • Prepare clear staff reports, notices, correspondence, and summaries • Identify field conditions and recommend appropriate technical solutions • Apply engineering standards to field construction and document required changes

EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING GUIDELINES
Any combination of experience and training that would provide the required knowledge, skills, and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain the knowledge, skills, and abilities would be:

Education and Experience
• For Technician I: No work experience in field is required; Associate degree in civil engineering technology, construction management, public administration, or a related field required.
• For Technician II: Requirements for Technician I plus, One (1) year of experience in public works, engineering, or construction support.
• For Technician III: Requirements for Technician I and II plus, Two (2) or more years of experience in public works project delivery, including bid package preparation and field oversight.
• Experience preparing cost estimates and bid packages is highly desirable. • Bachelor’s degree may substitute for one year of experience.

Licenses and Certifications
158
Public Works Engineering Technician II/III Page 4 of 5
Job Description, October 2025
• Valid California Class C Driver’s License required.
• Certifications in public procurement, GIS, or project management are desirable but not required.

TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT USED
• Office equipment: Desktop computer, printer, scanner, telephone, mobile devices • Software: Microsoft Office (Word, Excel, Outlook), Adobe Acrobat, GIS software, Laserfiche, asset management or permitting platforms.
• Field tools: Tape measure, digital camera, tablet or GPS unit, safety equipment (e.g., vest, hard hat)
• Vehicles: City vehicle for field site visits, inspections, and project coordination

PHYSICAL, MENTAL AND EMOTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
The physical demands described here are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions.

The employee must be physically able to sit for extended periods of time at a desk writing, talking on the phone, checking emails, or inputting data on a computer in a climatecontrolled office under artificial lighting, and attending both on and off-site meetings.

The employee must occasionally walk over uneven terrain, stand for extended periods during inspections, and wear appropriate safety gear while visiting active or future project sites.

The employee must have the ability to develop and maintain cooperative working relationships; remain composed and respond appropriately to difficult situations; recognize emotionally charged issues or problems, cope effectively with various responses and apply sound judgment in problem solving.

While performing the duties of this job, the employee works in a typical office setting with constant temperatures. The employee occasionally works in outside weather conditions.

The noise level in the work environment is usually quiet to moderate.

SELECTION GUIDELINES
Formal application, rating of education and experience; oral interview and reference checks; job related tests as well as a polygraph examination may be required. 159
Public Works Engineering Technician II/III Page 5 of 5
Job Description, October 2025
The duties listed above are intended only as illustrations of the various types of work that may be performed. The omission of specific statements of duties does not exclude them from the position if the work is similar, related or a logical assignment to the position.

The job description does not constitute an employment agreement between the employer and employee and is subject to change by the employer as the needs of the employer and requirements of the job change.

Approved by Council:
160

CITY OF BISHOP

PART-TIME EMPLOYEES WAGE SCALE
JULY 1, 2025 - JUNE 30, 2026
Position Step Hourly
I $ 20.55
II $ 21.55
III $ 22.55

FIRE DEPARTMENT
Position Step Hourly Monthly Statutory
Mechanic NO STEPS $ 37.95
Telecommunications (Radio) Technician NO STEPS $ 37.95
I $ 45.15
II $ 46.15
III $ 47.15
Volunteer Firefighters NO STEPS Per call: $20.55
Volunteer Emergency Medical Technician NO STEPS Per call: $20.55 I $ 20.55
II $ 21.55
III $ 22.55

COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Position Step Hourly
I $ 20.55
II $ 21.55
III $ 22.55
I $ 26.65
II $ 27.65
III $ 28.65
I $ 20.55
II $ 21.55
III $ 22.55
I $ 20.55
II $ 21.55
III $ 22.55
I $ 20.55
II $ 21.55
III $ 22.55
I $ 26.65
II $ 27.65
III $ 28.65
I $ 23.60
II $ 24.60
III $ 25.60
I $ 20.50
II $ 21.50
I $ 18.50
II $ 19.50
Step increases occur annually with one year in
between each step based on successful employee
evaluations.

Step increases occur annually with one year in
between each step based on successful employee
evaluations.

Step increases will be considered for each
additional season worked.

Facility Maintenance Worker
Custodian/Facility Maintenance Worker
Park Helper
Step increases occur annually with one year in
between each step based on successful employee
evaluations.

Aquatics Coordinator
Assistant Aquatics Coordinator
Step increases occur annually with one year in
between each step based on successful employee
evaluations.

Step increases occur annually with one year in
between each step based on successful employee
evaluations.

ADMINISTRATION / FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Recreation Coordinator
Step Adjustments
Step increases occur annually with one year in
between each step based on successful employee
evaluations.

Office Assistant
Office Assistant
Office Assistant
Step increases occur annually with one year in
between each step based on successful employee
evaluations.

Step increases occur annually with one year in
between each step based on successful employee
evaluations.

Fire Inspector
Step increases occur annually with one year in
between each step based on successful employee
evaluations.

Step Adjustments
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Step increases will be considered for each
additional season worked. Pool Manager (Senior Guard)
Lifeguard
1 161

CITY OF BISHOP

PART-TIME EMPLOYEES WAGE SCALE
JULY 1, 2025 - JUNE 30, 2026
COMMUNITY SERVICES (continued)
Pool Cashier I $ 18.50
I $ 20.55
II $ 21.55
III $ 22.55
Sports Official NO STEPS $ 42.00
Assistant Sports Official NO STEPS $ 29.00
Instructor NO STEPS $ 27.70
Activity Leader NO STEPS $ 18.50
I $ 20.55
II $ 21.55
III $ 22.55
I $ 23.60
II $ 24.60
III $ 25.60

POLICE DEPARTMENT
Position Step Hourly
I $ 20.55
II $ 21.55
III $ 22.55
I $ 25.00
II $ 26.00
III $ 27.00
Level II $ 22.55
Level I $ 37.95
Reserve Specialist NO STEPS $ 22.55
I $ 31.80
II $ 32.80
III $ 33.80
Police Cadet I $ 18.50
I $ 20.55
II $ 21.55
III $ 22.55
Facility Maintenance Worker II NO STEPS $ 23.60
Crossing Guard NO STEPS $ 18.50

PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Position Step Hourly
I $ 45.15
II $ 46.15
III $ 47.15
I $ 20.55
II $ 21.55
III $ 22.55
Step Adjustments
Step increases occur annually with one year in
between each step based on successful employee
evaluations.

Step increases occur annually with one year in
between each step based on successful employee
evaluations.

Not Applicable
Step increases occur annually with one year in
between each step based on successful employee
evaluations.

Step increases occur annually with one year in
between each step based on successful employee
evaluations.

Not Applicable
Step increases occur annually with one year in
between each step based on successful employee
evaluations.

Step increases occur annually with one year in
between each step based on successful employee
evaluations.

Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Step Adjustments
Office Assistant
Parking Enforcement Officer
Reserve
Relief Communications Operator
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Facility Maintenance Worker
Office Assistant
Step increases occur annually with one year in
between each step based on successful employee
evaluations.

Not Applicable
Athletic Coordinator
Program Leader
Not Applicable
Associate Planner / Economic Development
Coordinator
Step increases occur annually with one year in
between each step based on successful employee
evaluations.

Program Site Coordinator
2 162

CITY OF BISHOP

PART-TIME EMPLOYEES WAGE SCALE
JULY 1, 2025 - JUNE 30, 2026

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Position Step Hourly
I $ 20.55
II $ 21.55
III $ 22.55
I $ 44.10
II $ 45.10
III $ 46.10
IT Specialist NO STEPS $ 46.10
Engineer NO STEPS $ 64.60
Assistant Engineer NO STEPS $ 54.35
I $ 20.55
II $ 21.55
III $ 22.55
Public Works Intern NO STEPS $ 19.50
Position Hourly
Retired Annuitant
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Approved by Council on:

Not Applicable
Office Assistant
Drafter
A retired annuitant may work during an emergency to prevent stoppage of public business or because the annuitant has specialized skills needed in performing work of limited duration. The wage will be the hourly rate at time of retirement but not less than the minimum nor exceed that paid to other employees performing comparable duties.

Maintenance Worker
Step increases occur annually with one year in
between each step based on successful employee
evaluations.

Not Applicable
Step increases occur annually with one year in
between each step based on successful employee
evaluations.

Step Adjustments
Step increases occur annually with one year in
between each step based on successful employee
evaluations.
3 163
* Administrative correction for Police Captain,
effective date not included on prior approved Salary
Schedule.

CITY OF BISHOP

MONTHLY SALARY SCHEDULE
July 1, 2025 - June 30, 2026

ADMINISTRATION
Position Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Fixed
City Administrator $15,745
Assistant to the City Administrator (Not Filled) $8,006 $8,807 $9,598 City Clerk $8,865
Personnel/Payroll & Benefits Specialist $8,365
Executive Secretary/Assistant City Clerk (Not Filled) $5,717 $6,291 $6,920 $7,612 Administrative Support Assistant $4,983 $5,483 $6,029 $6,634

FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Position Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Fixed
Finance Director $8,865 $9,752 $10,726
Accounting Secretary/Budget Manager (Not Filled) $5,718 $6,291 $6,920 $7,612 Administrative / Accounting Assistant (Not Filled) $4,529 $4,985 $5,481 $6,031

COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Position Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Fixed
Community Services Director (Not Filled) $11,913
Community Services Manager $8,041
Community Services Administrative Assistant $4,529 $4,985 $5,481 $6,031 Parks Supervisor $4,921 $5,384 $5,956 $7,011
Recreation Supervisor (Not Filled) $4,687 $5,158 $5,672 $6,677 Parks Facilities Lead Worker $4,472 $4,919 $5,411 $5,952

FIRE DEPARTMENT
Position Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Fixed
Fire Chief $11,913
Deputy Fire Chief (Not Filled) $10,358
Assistant Fire Chief (Not Filled) $3,646 $4,010 $4,412 $4,852 Fire Captain $5,341 $5,877 $6,465 $7,114
Engineer $4,529 $4,985 $5,481 $6,031
Administrative Assistant $4,529 $4,985 $5,481 $6,031

POLICE DEPARTMENT
Position Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Fixed
Chief $13,858
Captain (CORRECTION, effective 7/7/2025) $11,394
Sergeant $7,773 $8,550 $9,404
Corporal $6,928 $7,621 $8,382
Police Officer $6,357 $7,063 $7,850
Police Officer in Training $4,802 $5,281 $5,811
Community Services Officer $4,529 $4,985 $5,481
Police Records Clerk $4,529 $4,985 $5,481 $6,031
Police Services Technician $4,583 $5,041 $5,545 $6,100
Senior Communications Operator $5,281 $5,810 $6,391 $7,029 Communications Operator $4,536 $5,039 $5,599 $6,221
164
* Administrative correction for Police Captain,
effective date not included on prior approved Salary
Schedule.

CITY OF BISHOP

MONTHLY SALARY SCHEDULE
July 1, 2025 - June 30, 2026

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Position Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Fixed
Public Works Director $12,979
Public Works Superintendent $10,174
Public Works Supervisor $6,496 $7,146 $7,858 $8,645
Building Inspector / Code Enforcement Officer $5,750 $6,325 $6,957 $7,653 Engineering Technician III $5,750 $6,325 $6,957 $7,653
Engineering Technician II $5,106 $5,617 $6,178 $6,796
Engineering Technician I (effective 10/27/2025) $4,583 $5,041 $5,545 $6,100 Lead Maintenance Worker (Not Filled) $5,341 $5,877 $6,465 $7,114 Maintenance Worker $4,921 $5,384 $5,956 $6,551
Public Works Secretary $4,529 $4,985 $5,481 $6,031

PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Position Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Fixed
Principal Planner $8,667
Assistant Planner (Not Filled) $5,341 $5,877 $6,465 $7,114 Approved by Council on:

Cost of Living Adjustments for Miscellaneous, Mid-Management, Management, and Bishop Police Officers Association contracts for Fiscal Years as follows: 2025/2026 -

2.5%
For all Step Classifications -Step Increases occur annually with one year in between each step based on successful employee evaluations. 165
Agenda Item: 16.J
Date of Meeting: October 27, 2025
Department: Finance
To: City Council
From: Ethan Aukee
Subject: S. Warren Street Improvement Project Budget Adjustment Request Prepared On: September 25, 2025

STAFF REPORT
Background/History:

When creating the FY 2025-26 budget, the City budgeted for the S. Warren Street Improvement Project, but the budgeting and accounting can be adjusted to follow best practices. Currently, the project is split between the General Fund and the Streets/Sidewalk Improvement Fund. Best practices would dictate use of a capital project fund, with General Fund and capital reserve funds being transferred/loaned to the project fund as needed. The capital project fund would maintain all cash flow, revenue and expenditure associated with the project.

Analysis/Discussion:

No additional analysis or discussion.

Economic Impacts:

No significant economic impacts associated with this budget adjustment request.

Budget Impacts:

Fund 055 will be used for the South Warren Street Improvement Project. The necessary budget adjustments are listed below:

Move Intergovernmental Revenue budget from General Fund to Capital Project Fund (Federal Earmark)
001-000-39520 1,000,000.00
055-000-39520 (1,000,000.00)
Move City Capital Outlay for Reimbursable Earmark to Capital Project Fund 001-023-56027 (1,000,000.00)
055-000-56027 1,000,000.00
Record Due to/from Funds for interfund loan for City Cash Flow Prior to Reimbursement from Earmark, General Fund reimbursed upon receipt of federal earmark funds 001-000-13100 1,000,000.00
166
055-000-20700 (1,000,000.00)
Move Non-Reimbursable City Capital Outlay to Capital Project Fund from Capital Reserve Fund
019-040-56027 (1,419,213.00)
055-000-56027 1,419,213.00
Record Operating Transfer from Capital Reserve Fund to Capital Project Fund 019-040-59999 1,419,213.00
055-000-39999 (1,419,213.00)
Legal Review:

City Attorney Pucci has reviewed this item and finds that the recommended action complies with the law.

Recommended Action:

City Council consideration to approve the proposed budget adjustment.

Approved By: Ethan Aukee 9/25/2025
Approved By: Robin Picken 9/29/2025
Approved By: Pam Foster 10/13/2025
Approved By:
167
Agenda Item: 16.K
Date of Meeting: October 27, 2025
Department: Public Works
To: City Council
From: Nora Gamino
Subject: Approval of Task Orders 25-TO-05 (HELIX Environmental Planning) and 25-TO-07 (Lumos & Associates) and Related Budget Adjustment for the East Line Street Bridge Replacement Project
Prepared On: October 15, 2025
Attachments: 25-TO-05 HELIX - Bridge Permitting
25-TO-07 Lumos - Bridge ROW Support

STAFF REPORT
Background/History:

The City of Bishop submitted the East Line Street Bridge Replacement Project to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) in 2008 and received COVID-era State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funds in 2021. A professional services contract with Lumos & Associates was executed in October 2021 for environmental compliance, permitting, design, and engineering. Due to COVID STIP funding time limitations, all project funding expires on or before June 30, 2025. As a result, funding for construction was lost, although the City is pursuing reprogramming of local STIP funds for FY 2027-28.

While construction remains unfunded, several remaining pre-construction activities are necessary to maintain project readiness and regulatory compliance. These include environmental permitting and right-of-way documentation to support eventual construction.

This project is included in Objective 3.2 of the City’s Strategic Plan.

Analysis/Discussion:

Task Order 25-TO-07 – Lumos & Associates
The final design of the bridge shifts the roadway alignment slightly to better center it within the existing right-of-way. This creates the need for temporary construction easements and potentially minor permanent right-of-way acquisition. The original Lumos contract did not include right-of-way engineering or legal description exhibits.

Lumos & Associates will prepare right-of-way and easement description exhibits for up to five parcels affected by the project, along with Permission to Construct (PTC) sketch maps. They will also provide coordination support to ensure right-of-way documentation aligns with environmental permit requirements.
168
The scope includes right-of-way and easement exhibits, legal descriptions, mapping, and coordination with the City’s permitting and acquisition process. The not-to-exceed fee for this work is $46,000.

Task Order 25-TO-05 – HELIX Environmental Planning
HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. will complete remaining environmental permitting for the project, which involves federal and state agency coordination and permit applications to:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) under Section 404, Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board (LRWQCB) under Section 401, and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) under Section 1602.

HELIX previously performed preliminary permitting work under Lumos and will now finalize permit applications, coordinate field verification, and manage inter-agency consultation.

The scope includes aquatic resources field verification, preparation of 404/401/1602 permit applications, and agency coordination. The not-to-exceed fee for this work is $54,000.

In total, the City has already received $318,542 in reimbursements from the California Department of Transportation for previously completed work under this project, including $125,676.71 for Project Approval and Environmental Documentation (PA/ED), $153,329.50 for Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E), and $39,535.79 for City staff time and indirect costs. These reimbursements reflect eligible work completed to date under the original STIP funding.

Economic Impacts:

No significant economic impacts associated with this action.

Budget Impacts:

This item is not included in the FY 2025-26 Budget; the below listed budget adjustment is required.

Operating transfer out of General Fund
001-023-59999 110,000.00
Operating transfer in to E. Line St. Bridge Replacement Fund 054-000-39999 (110,000.00)
Increased contract services spending within the E. Line St. Bridge Replacement Fund 054-000-55026 110,000.00
The operating transfer from General Fund to the capital project fund implies that the General Fund will finance $110,000 of spending within the capital project fund without expectation of repayment or reimbursement.

Legal Review:

City Attorney Pucci has reviewed this item and finds that the recommended action complies with the law.
169
Recommended Action:

Council consideration to:

1. Approve Task Order 25-TO-05 with HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. in the not-toexceed amount of $54,000;

2. Approve Task Order 25-TO-07 with Lumos & Associates in the not-to-exceed amount of $46,000;

3. Authorize the Public Works Director to execute the task orders on behalf of the City; and

4. Approve the budget adjustment transferring $110,000 from the General Fund to the East Line Street Bridge Replacement Project Fund.

Approved By: Ethan Aukee 10/23/2025
Approved By: Robin Picken 10/23/2025
Approved By:

Approved By:
170

CITY OF BISHOP
377 West Line Street - Bishop, California 93514
P. O. Box 1236 - Bishop, California 93515
City Hall 760-873-5863 Public Works 760-873-8458
Fax 760-873-4873
25-TO-05 Helix
E. Line Bridge Permitting Support Page 1 of 3
25-TO-05 Helix
for As Needed, On-Call Environmental Consulting Services Date: October 27, 2025
Consultant: HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc.

Contract No: 25-TO-05
Project Title: E. Line Bridge Permitting Support
Not to Exceed Fee: $54,000
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The City of Bishop is advancing the E. Line Street Bridge Replacement Project. The existing structure crosses Bishop Creek and will be replaced under a federally funded program.

HELIX Environmental Planning (HELIX) previously supported the project under Lumos & Associates but now proposes to complete the remaining environmental permitting tasks directly through the City’s On-Call Environmental Consulting Services Agreement, dated June 1, 2024.

The project requires federal and state permits due to potential impacts on jurisdictional waters (Bishop Creek). HELIX will prepare and coordinate the necessary regulatory permit applications for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board (LRWQCB), and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW).

HELIX provided the attached letter proposal (Exhibit A) that details the scope of services, deliverables, and cost estimates. Summaries are provided below.

B. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1 – Aquatic Resources Field Verification
• Coordinate a field visit with USACE to review the draft Aquatic Resources Delineation (HELIX August 2023).
• Revise and submit the final map for USACE verification.

Deliverable: Field verification meeting (if necessary); revised Aquatic Resources Delineation Map
Task 2 – Preparation of Aquatic Resource Permit Applications (404/401/1602) • Prepare a Clean Water Act Section 404 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) to USACE under Nationwide Permit 14 for Linear Transportation Projects. • Prepare a Section 401 Water Quality Certification Application (or Report of Waste Discharge) for LRWQCB.
171
25-TO-05 Helix
E. Line Bridge Permitting Support Page 2 of 3
• Prepare a CDFW Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Notification via EPIMS (Region 6, Inland Desert Region).
• Coordinate agency consultation and address comments.

Deliverables: Digital copies of the 404 PCN, 401 Certification, and 1602 Notification packages
Task 3 – Meetings and Agency Consultation
• Provide project management and liaison services throughout the regulatory permitting process.
• Participate in kick-off and coordination meetings (virtual and as needed). • Record and distribute meeting minutes within five business days.

Deliverables: Meeting attendance and minutes
C. ASSUMPTIONS AND PROVIDED DOCUMENTS

1. All work will be conducted on a time and materials basis.

2. For the purpose of this scope, HELIX assumes that only one round of consolidated comments will be necessary for each regulatory permit application.

3. HELIX will rely on the preliminary jurisdictional delineation to support the regulatory permit application processes. Additional studies, such as protocol surveys for specialstatus species, if requested by the aquatic resource regulatory agencies, are not covered under this scope of work, and would require authorization of a separate scope and budget.

4. All regulatory permit application and processing fees will be paid by the City.

5. The regulatory permit applications will be based on 100% design plans prepared by Lumos & Associates (stamped 6/30/2025) as approved by the City. This scope of work assumes that the project will qualify for a Nationwide Permit from the USACE and that the regulatory permits (404/401) can be issued based on current project design.

D. PROPOSED PROJECT SCHDULE
Task # Deliverable Milestone Anticipated Date
1 Draft permit applications sent to City
for review
Within 60 days of notice to
proceed (NTP)
Feb. 2026
1 Schedule field verification meeting with
USACE (if needed)
Within 60 days of NTP Feb. 2026
1 Revised aquatic resources delineation
map
Within 60 days of NTP Feb. 2026
2 Revise and compile permit applications
for electronic submittals
30 days after City comments
received
Apr 2026
3 Undertake agency consultation
component
Within 15 days of submittal of
draft permit applications
Apr 2026
3 Permit Approvals (anticipated) Approx. 14 months after NTP Feb 2027 NTP = notice to proceed and is expected to be issued on or about October 28, 2025. 172
25-TO-05 Helix
E. Line Bridge Permitting Support Page 3 of 3
E. FEES
The total cost to complete the work included in the Scope of Services shall not exceed $54,000 without written authorization. This work and any additional work outside the Scope of Services will be billed on a time and materials basis based on the following fee schedule and as detailed in HELIX’s proposal (Exhibit A).

Task Cost
1 – Aquatic Resources Field Verification $ 6,000
2 – Preparation of Permit Applications $30,500
3 – Meetings and Agency Consultation $17,500
TOTAL ALL TASKS $54,000
F. CONTACT PERSON
City of Bishop Consultant
Nora Gamino Robert Edgerton, AICP CEP
Public Works Director Principal
760-874-8983 916-365-8713
[email protected] [email protected]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Task Order has been executed under the provisions of the As Needed, On-Call Civil Engineering Service Agreement between the City of Bishop and Helix Environmental Planning, Inc that was executed on June 1, 2024. By the signatures below, the parties hereto agree that all terms and conditions of this Task Order and previously agreed upon On-Call Service Agreement shall be in full force and effect. ________________________________
Nora Gamino
Public Works Director
City of Bishop
________________________________
Robert Edgerton
Principal Planner
HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc.
______________
Date
______________
Date
173

CITY OF BISHOP
377 West Line Street - Bishop, California 93514
P. O. Box 1236 - Bishop, California 93515
City Hall 760-873-5863 Public Works 760-873-8458
Fax 760-873-4873
25-TO-07
E. Line Bridge Right-of-Way and Easement Description Exhibits Page 1 of 3 25-TO-07 Lumos
for As Needed, On-Call Engineering and Surveying Services Date: October 27, 2025
Consultant: Lumos & Associates
Contract No: 25-TO-07
Project Title: E. Line Bridge Right-of-Way and Easement Description Exhibits Not to Exceed Fee: $46,000
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
With the completion of the 100-percent design plans for the East Line Street Bridge Replacement Project, the City of Bishop requires right-of-way (ROW) and easement description exhibits prior to construction, as well as support through the environmental permitting process. Construction activities are anticipated to impact five properties adjacent to the project area. Lumos will provide the services described below to support these efforts. The full Lumos proposal is attached as Exhibit A.

B. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1 – Right-of-Way Land Description Exhibits
Lumos will prepare temporary and/or permanent easement documents, including legal descriptions and exhibit maps, for up to six (6) properties affected by the East Line Street Bridge Replacement Project. All work will conform to City of Bishop standards.

Permission to Construct (PTC) sketch maps will also be prepared for use by the City in obtaining construction access, following applicable agency requirements.

Lumos will also prepare Temporary Construction Easements (TCEs), including legal descriptions and exhibit maps, for up to six (6) properties affected by the East Line Street Bridge Replacement Project as requested by the City of Bishop.

This task does not include preparation of property appraisals, right-of-way deeds, or direct negotiations with property owners. It is the City’s responsibility to work with legal counsel or a title company to prepare and execute the final conveyance documents to which the exhibits will be attached.
174
25-TO-07
E. Line Bridge Right-of-Way and Easement Description Exhibits Page 2 of 3 Deliverables:
• Draft and final right-of-way and easement legal descriptions (Word and PDF formats).
• Draft and final sketch/exhibit maps and PTC maps (PDF and CAD formats). • Draft and final sketch/exhibit maps for TCEs (PDF and CAD formats). • Title-reference matrix identifying affected parcels and associated documents.

Task 2 – Permitting Management and ROW Acquisition Support Lumos will coordinate with the City’s design and environmental teams to ensure ROW documentation aligns with environmental permit requirements. Support may include preparation of displays or data illustrating the extent of property impacts, review of permit submittals for consistency with ROW boundaries, and coordination with the City during any easement acquisition process.

Deliverables:
• Graphics, tables, or other exhibits illustrating property impacts for use in permit submittals.
• Coordination materials and correspondence supporting environmental permitting and ROW documentation.
• Updates or clarifications to legal descriptions or exhibits, if required by agencies, within the authorized budget.

C. ASSUMPTIONS AND PROVIDED DOCUMENTS

1. Preliminary title reports for four (4) parcels have been provided by the City.

2. The potential fifth parcel (A.P.N. 001-201-07) may require an additional title report and will be supplied by the City, if necessary.

3. Two (2) rounds of revisions are included.

4. Property appraisals, deed preparation, and direct coordination with landowners are not included.

D. PROPOSED PROJECT SCHDULE
• Task 1 will be completed approximately 12 weeks after Task Order Acceptance.
• Task 2 will remain ongoing until completion of environmental permitting and ROW acquisition.
175
25-TO-07
E. Line Bridge Right-of-Way and Easement Description Exhibits Page 3 of 3 E. FEES
The total cost to complete the work included in the Scope of Services shall not exceed $46,000 without written authorization as described below. This work and any additional work outside the Scope of Services will be billed on a time and materials basis based on the fee schedule attached (Exhibit A).

Task Description Fee
Task 1 Right-of-Way/PTC/TCE Land Description Exhibits $36,000 Task 2 Permitting Management and ROW Acquisition
Support
$10,000
F. CONTACT PERSON
City of Bishop Lumos & Associates
Nora Gamino Camille Buehler, PE, PLS
Public Works Director Group Manager
760-874-8983 775-827-6111
[email protected] [email protected]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Task Order has been executed under the provisions of the As Needed, On-Call Civil Engineering Service Agreement between the City of Bishop and Lumos & Associates that was executed on July 1, 2023. By the signatures below, the parties hereto agree that all terms and conditions of this Task Order and previously agreed upon On-Call Service Agreement shall be in full force and effect. ________________________________
Nora Gamino
Public Works Director
City of Bishop
________________________________
Dan Stucky, PE
Director of Engineering
Lumos & Associates
______________
Date
______________
Date
176
Carson City • El Dorado Hills • Fallon • Lake Tahoe • Reno www.LumosInc.com L:\LAProj\10568.000 - East Line Street Bridge Replacement\0-Project Management\Proposals\ROW support Proposal\2025.1016 - ROW Support.docx Reno
950 Sandhill Road, Suite 100
Reno, Nevada 89521
775.827.6111
October 16, 2025
Nora Gamino, Director of Public Works
City of Bishop
377 West Line Street
Bishop, California 93514
[email protected]
Subject: East Line Street Bridge Replacement Project – Right-Of-Way and Easement Description Exhibits
Dear Nora:

Lumos and Associates, Inc. is pleased to provide the City of Bishop with this proposal for additional Right-Of-Way and Easement descriptions relating to the East Line Street Bridge Replacement Project.

Project Understanding
It is our understanding that with the completion of the 100% plans for the East Line Street Bridge Replacement Project, the City of Bishop will need right-of-way (ROW) and easement description exhibits prior to construction of the project, as well as assistance through the environmental permitting process. Construction activities are anticipated to impact five properties adjacent to the project area. Below is our scope necessary to achieve these objectives.

Task 1 – Right-of-Way Land Description Exhibits
Lumos will develop temporary and/or permanent easement documents including legal descriptions and sketch maps for transfers of right-of-way to the City of Bishop, as applicable, for use by the City of Bishop per the City of Bishop standards for up to six (6) properties. We will also develop Permission to Construct (PTC) sketch maps for use by the City of Bishop per the applicable agency standards. This task does not include any budget for property appraisals, right of way deed preparation, or in person meetings with individual land owners. It will be the client’s responsibility to work with their attorney or title company to create and execute the conveyance document that the proposed exhibits will be attached to.

The City provided Lumos preliminary title reports for four (4) of the properties the proposed right of way dedications will affect in September of 2023. The potential fifth exhibit could be required on A.P.N. 001-201-07, that we did not receive a title report for. Updated title reports and a new report may need to be provided.

Within this budget we have anticipated two (2) revisions as requested by the Client. 177
October 16, 2025

Page 2 ends

Task 2 – Permitting Management and ROW Acquisition Support Lumos will coordinate with other subcontractors through the environmental permitting process to develop any displays or coordinate expected impacts related to the project design. Lumos will also coordinate with the City of Bishop Staff to supplement acquisition of any easement or right-of-way documentation.

Schedule
Lumos estimates Task 1 will be complete in approximately 12 weeks after Task Order Acceptance.

Task 2 will remain ongoing until permitting and ROW acquisition is complete.

Fees
The tasks described in the Scope of Work will be completed for the following T&M, not to exceed fees, unless noted otherwise:

Task Fee
Task 1 $ 36,000
Task 2 $ 10,000
Project Design Tasks $ 46,000
Description
Right-of-Way Land Description Exhibits
Permitting Management and ROW Acquisition Support
Lumos & Associates can amend this proposal as necessary to include any of these services.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 775.827.6111.

Sincerely,
Camille Buehler, P.E., P.L.S.

Group Manager
Ask 178
Standard Fee Schedule
January 1, 2025
NV
• Fees for prevailing wage rate projects are available upon request. • Map filing, checking, consulting, and other fees paid on behalf of the client shall be billed at cost plus fifteen percent (15%). • Overtime hours will be billed at 1.5 times the standard rate where applicable. • Survey and Field crew billing rates include standard field survey equipment and truck up to 30 mile radius, after which mileage rates apply
• Fees for depositions and testimony will be billed at two (2) times the standard billing rates Engineering Per Hour
Director $295
Group Manager 280
Senior Project Manager – Special Projects 250
Assistant / Project / Senior Project Manager 210/235/250 Staff / Project / Senior Hydrogeologist 190/200/215
Staff / Project / Senior Engineer 190/205/215
Assistant / Project / Senior Project Coordinator 145/185/195 Project / Senior Project Designer 160/170
Engineering Technician I / II / III 110/140/150
Construction Per Hour
Director $295
Materials Engineering Manager 265
Assistant / Project / Senior Project Manager 210/235/250 Staff / Project / Senior Geotechnical Engineer 190/205/215 Construction Services Supervisor / Engineer 175/185
Assistant / Project / Senior Project Coordinator 145/185/195 Geotechnician 175
Inspector / Senior Inspector (includes nuclear gauge) 160/170 Construction Technician I / II / III 120/130/140
Materials Technician I / II / III (includes nuclear gauge) 110/120/130 Administrative Technician 90/100/110
Surveying Per Hour
Director $295
Group Manager 280
Assistant / Project / Senior Project Manager 210/235/250 Staff / Project / Senior Surveyor 190/205/215
Assistant / Project / Senior Project Coordinator 145/185/195 Photogrammetrist / Photogrammetry Manager 170/205
GIS Analyst 140
Surveying Technician I / II / III 95/140/150
Party Chief 190
Administrative & Other Services Per Hour
Administrative Support $135
Copy & Print Services Cost + 15%
Mileage (per mile) 0.90
These rates apply to services rendered through December 31, 2025. Services provided after this date will be invoiced according to the Standard Fee Schedule in effect at that time. 179
Agenda Item: 16.L
Date of Meeting: October 27, 2025
Department: Public Works
To: City Council
From: Nora Gamino
Subject: Declaration of City-Owned Equipment as Surplus Prepared On: October 20, 2025

STAFF REPORT
Background/History:

The City Public Works Department owns a Vaccon Sewer Truck (asset ID #022100-51) that was purchased on 2006 and recently replaced. The department does not need to retain this old piece of equipment. The department also owns a Morbark trailer mounted woodchipper (no asset ID) that was purchased in 2022. This chipper was intended to streamline operations, however due to its size and difficulty maneuvering, the equipment has gone mostly unused.

Rather than retaining equipment that will not be utilized, the department recommends declaration of the Vaccon Truck and trailer mounted chipper as surplus and also recommends subsequent inclusion of the equipment in an independent public auction.

Analysis/Discussion:

If City Council declares the old Vaccon truck and trailer mounted chipper as surplus equipment, City staff intend to hold public auctions for purchase of the equipment on www.publicsurplus.com. This vendor offers its services free of charge to interested sellers.

Economic Impacts:

There are no significant economic impacts.

Budget Impacts:

If City Council declares these items as surplus, the budget would be affected based on the increased revenue resulting from the subsequent sale of the equipment. The Vaccon truck is fully owned by the sewer fund. The trailer mounted chipper is owned 40% by the water fund, 30% by the sewer fund, and 30% by the general fund (streets). Proceeds would be returned to the funds that originally purchased the equipment.

Legal Review:

City Attorney Pucci has reviewed this item and finds that the recommended action complies with the law.

Recommended Action:

Council consideration to declare the Public Works Department's Vaccon truck and trailer 180
mounted chipper as surplus equipment.

Approved By: Ethan Aukee 10/21/2025
Approved By: Robin Picken 10/23/2025
Approved By:

Approved By:
181
Agenda Item: 16.M
Date of Meeting: October 27, 2025
Department: Administration
To: City Council
From: Pam Foster
Subject: Consideration of Request from Coalition Against Bigger Trucks (CABT) for Letter Opposing Increases in Truck Size and Weight Prepared On: October 21, 2025
Attachments: CABT Draft Letter

STAFF REPORT
Background/History:

The Coalition Against Bigger Trucks (CABT) has submitted a request to Mayor Kong urging the City of Bishop to formally express opposition to federal legislation that would increase the size and weight limits for commercial trucks. Specifically, current discussions in Washington, D.C. include proposals to increase allowable truck weights up to 91,000 pounds and expand the length of twin-trailer configurations.

CABT is requesting that the City send a letter to its federal representatives outlining the negative impacts such proposals would have on local infrastructure, safety, and the community overall.

Analysis/Discussion:

Bishop is uniquely positioned at the junction of U.S. Routes 395 and 6, which are heavily trafficked by commercial freight vehicles. Due to the absence of a bypass around the City, all truck traffic, including oversize and wide-load vehicles, passes directly through the downtown corridor. The result is a high volume of heavy vehicle traffic navigating local streets that were not designed for trucks of expanded size or weight.

According to CABT, California has seen a 51% increase in truck crash fatalities over the past decade. In 2023 alone, the state recorded 12,212 large-truck crashes resulting in 392 fatalities and 5,308 injuries. CABT and other stakeholders believe that increasing truck size and weight would exacerbate these safety concerns, particularly in communities like Bishop where truck traffic intersects with pedestrian areas, local businesses, and constrained roadways. 182
CABT's proposed letter advocates for holding the line on federal truck size and weight mandates and urges federal legislators to oppose any such increases during the remainder of the current Congressional session.

Economic Impacts:

There are no economic impacts of sending a letter.

Budget Impacts:

There is no direct fiscal impact to sending a letter. However, long-term impacts from increased truck sizes and weights could include higher local costs for road repairs, increased traffic delays, and potential public safety expenditures.

Legal Review:

Recommended Action:

Council consideration to approve the attached letter from the Mayor, on behalf of the City of Bishop, to the City’s federal representatives opposing proposed increases in the allowable size and weight of commercial trucks, as requested by the Coalition Against Bigger Trucks (CABT).

Approved By: Pam Foster 10/21/2025
Approved By:

Approved By:

Approved By:
183
184

CITY OF BISHOP

PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION

MEETING CANCELLED
City Council Chambers - 301 West Line Street - Bishop, California WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2023 - 6:00 PM
Meeting Cancellation Notice
This scheduled meeting for the Parks and Recreation Commission has been cancelled. 1 185

City of Bishop
Planning Commission
There will be no Planning Commission Meeting
October 28, 2025
The next regularly scheduled meeting will be
November 25, 2025
Bishop City Council Chambers
301 West Line Street
Bishop, CA 93514
760-873-8458
186
Agenda Item: 17.A
Date of Meeting: October 27, 2025
Department: Public Works
To: City Council
From: Nora Gamino
Subject: Adoption of the 2025–2030 Water and Sewer Capital Improvement Plans
Prepared On: October 17, 2025
Attachments: Water Projects CIP
Sewer Projects CIP

STAFF REPORT
Background/History:

The City of Bishop maintains Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) for both the Water and Sewer Utility Funds to provide a structured approach for maintaining, replacing, and upgrading essential infrastructure. The CIPs identify projects needed to sustain reliable utility operations, protect public health, and comply with regulatory requirements.

Capital Improvement Plans are long-standing best practices among public agencies, serving as planning tools that link system needs, strategic goals, and financial planning. Like those used by neighboring agencies, Bishop’s CIPs provide a framework to identify and prioritize infrastructure investments, estimate future costs, and coordinate project timing and funding sources.

While the plans do not authorize individual project expenditures, they play a critical role in aligning the City’s infrastructure programs with its financial capacity, including water and sewer rate-setting. The five-year CIP establishes the near-term investment strategy for both systems and supports long-range planning to ensure continued service reliability.

The current water and sewer CIPs were developed as part of the City’s ongoing rate study process, which has incorporated project timing, funding assumptions, and financial scenarios to maintain fiscal sustainability while minimizing rate impacts.

Development of these CIPs is included in Objectives 3.3 and 3.4 of the City’s Strategic Plan.

Analysis/Discussion:

The updated Water CIP represents a refined and more financially balanced version of the plan presented to Council on September 22, 2025. In response to feedback and financial modeling results, the distribution system improvement program was scaled back to reduce near-term 187
capital costs. Specifically, several fire flow improvement projects (replacement of older 4-inch mains with 8-inch lines) were deferred beyond the five-year period. In their place, the plan includes an annual $250,000 allocation, starting in year 3, for Annual Line Replacement, allowing for smaller, targeted improvements to continue while lowering the short-term funding burden on ratepayers.

Overall, the five-year Water CIP totals approximately $14.2 million, including $3.5 million in rate-funded projects and $10.6 million in loan or grant-funded projects. Major efforts include the new production well project (anticipated WRDA and rate revenue funding), meter installation and management system implementation (anticipated loan or grant funded), well rehabilitation and motor replacements, tank rehabilitation, and essential vehicle and equipment replacements.

The Sewer CIP totals approximately $9.8 million, of which $2.0 million is rate-funded and $7.8 million is anticipated to be funded through USDA or other external sources. The plan focuses on collection system rehabilitation, lining, and inflow/infiltration reduction, as well as BAWA planning and design for the regional wastewater treatment plant, which is substantially funded through the State Revolving Fund. This combination of local and external funding allows the City to advance critical system improvements while substantially reducing the financial burden on sewer customers.

Approval of these CIPs will establish the City’s capital investment framework for the next five years, ensuring consistency with the upcoming rate study, state regulatory goals, and the City’s broader infrastructure planning efforts.

Public outreach was not conducted specifically for development of the CIPs. The plans are technical planning documents that identify system needs and funding strategies, developed using staff expertise, condition assessments, and regulatory requirements. Broader public review and feedback will occur through the rate study and Proposition 218 process, where the financial impacts and project priorities are presented for public consideration.

Economic Impacts:

There are no direct economic impacts from adopting the CIPs. However, these plans directly inform the City’s water and sewer rate-setting process, ensuring that future rate adjustments are based on realistic capital investment needs and available funding sources.

Budget Impacts:

There are no immediate budget impacts. Adoption of the CIPs does not authorize specific project expenditures. Individual projects will be brought to Council for budget approval and contract award at the time of implementation.

Legal Review:

City Attorney Pucci has reviewed this item and finds that the recommended action complies with the law.

Recommended Action:

Council consideration to approve of the 2025–2030 Water and Sewer Capital Improvement Plans as presented.

Approved By: Ethan Aukee 10/23/2025
188
Approved By: Robin Picken 10/23/2025
Approved By: Pam Foster 10/23/25
Approved By:
189
Category Project Name/Description FY2025-2026 FY2026-2027 FY2027-2028 FY2028-2029 FY2029-2030 Total Cost Anticipated Funding Source Distribution System Isolation Valve Installation Project $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 Loan & RR Distribution System West Line Water Line Replacement [1] $ 2,350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,350,000 Loan & RR Distribution System South Warren - Lagoon to South Water Line Replacement $ 170,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 170,000 Rate Revenue Facilities & Equipment Flatbed F-550 Maintenance/Plow Truck (x2) $ 32,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 39,000 $ 71,000 Rate Revenue Water Supply New Production Well [2] $ - $ 225,000 $ 225,000 $ 2,861,000 $ - $ 3,311,000 Grant & RR Storage Storage & Control Tank Rehabilitations $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Rate Revenue Water Supply Well #2 & 4 Pump rebuilds, well inspections, and rehabilitation $ - $ 230,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 230,000 Rate Revenue Water Supply Well #2 and 4 motor replacements and rebuilds $ - $ 120,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 120,000 Rate Revenue Water Supply Well #4 Electrical Panel Replacement $ - $ 70,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 70,000 Rate Revenue Facilities & Equipment 10 yd. Dump/Snow Plow Truck $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 Rate Revenue Facilities & Equipment Permanent Backup Generators $ - $ 120,000 $ 130,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 Grant or Loan Distribution System East Line - Main to Hanby $ - $ 207,000 $ 1,173,000 $ - $ - $ 1,380,000 Grant or Loan Facilities & Equipment Security Fence Replacement Well #2 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 Rate Revenue Facilities & Equipment Front End Loader $ - $ - $ 81,000 $ - $ - $ 81,000 Rate Revenue Water Quality & Compliance Implementation of Water Meters & Management System [3] $ - $ - $ - $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 5,000,000 Grant or Loan Facilities & Equipment Forklift $ - $ - $ - $ 28,000 $ - $ 28,000 Rate Revenue Facilities & Equipment Air Compressor $ - $ - $ - $ 8,000 $ - $ 8,000 Rate Revenue Facilities & Equipment Flatbed F-550 Maintenance/Plow Truck $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Rate Revenue Distribution System Annual Line Replacement $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 750,000 Rate Revenue Total Rate Revenue Funded $ 1,202,000 $ 795,000 $ 606,000 $ 647,000 $ 289,000 $ 3,539,000 $ 707,800 Total Grant/Loan Funded $ 1,500,000 $ 327,000 $ 1,303,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 10,630,000 $ 2,126,000 Total $ 2,702,000 $ 1,122,000 $ 1,909,000 $ 5,647,000 $ 2,789,000 $ 14,169,000 $ 2,833,800 # of Value of
Projects Projects
Water Supply 4 3,731,000 $ Storage 1 100,000 $ Distribution System 5 4,800,000 $ Water Quality & Compliance 1 5,000,000 $ Energy Efficiency & Sustainability 0- $ Technology & SCADA 0- $ Facilities & Equipment 8 538,000 $ Totals 19 14,169,000 $
Automation, advanced metering (AMI/AMR), and cybersecurity improvements.Yard and workshop improvements, vehicle and equipment replacement, and physical security.New wells, well rehabilitation, and backup/emergency sources.Tank rehabilitation, new reservoirs, and seismic retrofits.Replacement or upsizing of water mains, interconnections, fire flow improvements, and pressure regulation.Lead service line replacement, monitoring systems, and regulatory-driven improvements.Solar generation, energy recovery, and conservation initiatives. 2 - The new production well is assumed to be funded via a $2.5M WRDA grant (not guaranteed) in FY28/29 which requires a 25% match. Remaining project costs, and those in FY26/27 and FY27/28, are assumed to be funded via rate revenues.3 - SB 552 mandates meters by 2032. Goal is to have meters installed prior to next rate study. Project is phased over 2 years, but could phase over more years if necessary to comply by 2032.

City of Bishop - Water Infrastructure Capital Improvement Plan 1 - The West Line Water Line project is assumed to be funded via a $1.5M USDA loan with about $1.0M in remaining cost funded via rate revenues. The project includes replacing the West Line Water Line ($2.35 M) and installing main Water CIP Categories Definition (Water) printed 10/17/2025
190
Category Project Name/Description FY2025-2026 FY2026-2027 FY2027-2028 FY2028-2029 FY2029-2030 Total Cost Anticipated Funding Source Facilities & Equipment Flatbed F-550 Maintenance/Plow Truck (x2) $ 32,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 39,000 $ 71,000 Rate Revenue Collection System Willow Sewer Improvements $ 81,000 $ 729,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 810,000 Grant (USDA) Collection System Johnston Drive Lining $ 21,000 $ 189,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 210,000 Grant (USDA) Collection System North Main Rehabilitation $ 58,000 $ 522,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 580,000 Grant (USDA) Collection System City Park Lining $ 55,000 $ 495,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 550,000 Grant (USDA) Collection System Sierra Lining $ 14,000 $ 126,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 140,000 Grant (USDA) Collection System Elm Rehabilitation $ 93,000 $ 837,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 930,000 Grant (USDA) Collection System Grove Rehabilitation $ 31,000 $ 279,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 310,000 Grant (USDA) Collection System Manhole Rehabilitations $ 17,000 $ 153,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 170,000 Grant (USDA) Collection System Warren Rehabilitation $ 29,000 $ 261,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 290,000 Grant (USDA) Collection System Academy Rehabilitation $ 23,000 $ 207,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 230,000 Grant (USDA) Collection System S. Main Lining $ 10,000 $ 90,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Grant (USDA) Collection System Downtown - N. Main Lining $ 29,000 $ 261,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 290,000 Grant (USDA) BAWA Planning & Design of New WWTP [1] $ 300,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 1,268,500 $ - $ 3,068,500 Grant (CWSRF) Facilities & Equipment 10 yd. Dump/Snow Plow Truck $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 Rate Revenue Facilities & Equipment Permanent Backup Generator $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Grant or Loan Facilities & Equipment Sludge Pump VFD Replacements $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 Rate Revenue Collection System Hammond 4 Inch $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 Rate Revenue Lift Station Johnston Dr. Lift Station building $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 Rate Revenue Facilities & Equipment Front End Loader $ - $ - $ 81,000 $ - $ - $ 81,000 Rate Revenue Collection System S. 3rd Belly Replacement $ - $ - $ 410,000 $ - $ - $ 410,000 Rate Revenue BAWA Land Acquisition from LADWP for disposal fields [2] $ - $ - $ 343,000 $ - $ - $ 343,000 Rate Revenue Collection System Grove Schools to Home $ - $ - $ - $ 130,000 $ - $ 130,000 Rate Revenue Collection System Clarke Sewer Replacement 1 $ - $ - $ - $ 430,000 $ - $ 430,000 Rate Revenue Facilities & Equipment Forklift $ - $ - $ - $ 28,000 $ - $ 28,000 Rate Revenue Facilities & Equipment Air Compressor $ - $ - $ - $ 8,000 $ - $ 8,000 Rate Revenue Total Rate Revenue Funded $ 32,000 $ 550,000 $ 834,000 $ 1,253,500 $ 39,000 $ 2,051,000 Total Grant/Loan Funded $ 761,000 $ 4,999,000 $ 750,000 $ 611,000 $ - $ 7,778,500 Total $ 793,000 $ 5,549,000 $ 1,584,000 $ 1,864,500 $ 39,000 $ 9,829,500 # of Value of
Projects Projects
Collection System 16 5,830,000 $
Lift Station 1 200,000 $ Treatment Plant 0- $ Effluent Disposal 0- $ Regulatory & Compliance 0- $ Technology & SCADA 0- $ Energy Efficiency & Sustainability 0- $ Facilities & Equipment 7 388,000 $ BAWA 2 3,411,500 $ Totals 26 9,829,500 $
1 - State Revolving Funding total is $2.411M, leaving a funding gap of $1.315M to complete project. Costs shown reflect full amount for grant funding ($2.411M) and half the amount of the funding gap ($657.5k) all shown in FY28/29. Total anticipated cost of project is $3.726M.2 - Total anticipated price of land acquisition for 202.09 acres land and a 7.81 acre access easement is $686k. Cost shown reflects half of the total purchase price.

City of Bishop - Sewer Infrastructure Capital Improvement Plan Wastewater CIP Categories Definition (Wastewater)
Controls modernization, telemetry, and cybersecurity.Cogeneration, solar generation, and process optimization for energy savings.Yard and workshop improvements, vehicle and equipment replacement, and physical security.projects associated with BAWA and subject to conditions/terms of JPASewer main replacement, manhole rehabilitation, and inflow/infiltration reduction.Pump replacements, capacity upgrades, controls improvements, and backup power.Process expansions, nutrient removal, biosolids handling, and odor control.Outfall rehabilitation, recycled water systems, recharge, and land application.Monitoring upgrades, pretreatment improvements, and permit-driven projects. printed 10/16/2025
191
Agenda Item: 17.B
Date of Meeting: October 27, 2025
Department: Administration
To: City Council
From: Pam Foster
Subject: A-Frame Building (Bishop Area Chamber of Commerce and Visitors Center) - Structural Integrity and Site Considerations
Prepared On: October 21, 2025
Attachments: A Frame Structural Conditions Report

STAFF REPORT
Background/History:

Located at 690 North Main Street, the A-Frame building currently houses the Bishop Area Chamber of Commerce and Visitors Center. The building has many visible structural defects which have been a source of concern and on-going conversations between the City and the Chamber. These conversations and observations, including concerns raised by Willdan Engineering led to red tags being issued in a portion of the building.

The City then commissioned further evaluation of the buildings structural integrity. The City engaged Wood Rodgers, Inc. to perform a comprehensive structural condition assessment of the building to evaluate the building’s integrity and provide clear guidance on whether continued use, retrofitting, or demolition is appropriate. Following this report additional areas were issued red tags.

The City does not have records of building permits for the original A frame building or subsequent additions that may have been installed by a local service group.

Analysis/Discussion:

Summary of Structural Assessment – Wood Rodgers, Inc.

The building consists of three distinct sections, including the A-frame, a central area, and a southern addition adjacent to the creek.

Following comprehensive evaluations, Wood Rodgers rated the overall condition of the 192
building as POOR, concluding that it may be nearing the end of its useful life.

Key Findings Include:

Overstressed second-floor framing in the A-frame section, where joists may exceed load limits under both dead and live loads.

Unclear or inadequate structural connections between second-floor joists and support elements.

Undermined foundation posts in the southern addition, particularly those close to the creek, compromising structural stability.

Conclusions:

Wood Rodgers recommends no occupancy or storage use on the second floor of the Aframe.

The findings validate safety concerns raised by Willdan regarding the southern addition.

Due to these serious structural concerns, Building and Safety has issued red tags on portions of the building to restrict access to unsafe areas. City staff have worked closely with the Chamber of Commerce to allow continued, limited use of the building while prioritizing lifesafety concerns, ensuring the Chamber can operate while transitioning to its new location. The Chamber of Commerce has purchased a new building and will be transitioning their operations to their new space in the coming weeks.

Wood Rodgers provided critical input regarding the site’s proximity to environmental features including:

The southern addition is built near a creek, and any retention of this portion would require identification of the high-water elevation, creek boundaries, and determination of a riparian zone.

These areas may fall under multiple regulatory jurisdictions, including:

California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Any redevelopment or partial retention should ensure the structure lies outside of regulated zones, to reduce environmental impact and streamline the permitting timeline (estimated to exceed 1 year). The proximity to the creek could greatly reduce the overall footprint of a remodeled or new building.
193
The report concludes that further evaluation, retrofitting, replacement or demolition is necessary to address the comprehensive and complex substandard structural issues.

Due to these findings Council direction is required as there is a potential significant financial investment of public funds for any of the options.

Economic Impacts:

There is no anticipated economic impact resulting from any near-term closure or restriction of the current building, as the Bishop Visitors Center will reopen in the Chamber’s new location.

The services that have been provided in the existing building will continue with minimal disruption.

Longer-term opportunities exist for redevelopment of the site, depending on community priorities and financial capacity.

See following section for cost estimates.

Budget Impacts:

The City has spent $17,121 on the structural conditions assessment to date.

There is no current budget allocation for demolition, design, or construction related to this property. If Council directs staff to pursue any of these actions, it will require a reexamination of the City’s Strategic Plan and fiscal priorities and budget.

Demolition and New Construction
Demolition Estimates (Preliminary):

Full demolition of existing structure: $60,000 – $90,000 Excludes permitting fees, construction documentation, or potential hazardous material abatement.

Selective demolition (e.g., preserving A-frame): likely higher due to complexity.

New Construction Estimates:
$250 – $600 per square foot, depending on building type, complexity, and materials.

Does not include site work or permitting.
194
Professional Design Fees:

Estimated at $175,000 – $275,000, including services from:

Architect
Structural Engineer
Civil Engineer
Land Surveyor
Electrical & Mechanical Engineers
Estimated Total (New Building) $985,000 - $2.165 million (excluding permitting and site improvements.

Legal Review:

The City is legally obligated to address known life-safety hazards and structural defects identified at the site. Red tagging portions of the building and enforcing restricted access has been deemed required by the City as well as by independent assessments.

Any demolition, construction, or work near the creek must comply with applicable state and federal environmental and land use regulations.

Recommended Action:

Staff recommends that the City Council receive and provide direction on the structural condition assessment report prepared by Wood Rodgers, Inc. regarding the current Chamber of Commerce Building in City Park.

Commensurate with any direction staff also requests Council consider potential funding options as there is currently no budget allocation for this project.

Approved By: Pam Foster 10/23/2025
Approved By:

Approved By:

Approved By:
195
3741 Douglas Blvd, Suite 150 • Roseville, CA 95661 • Tel: 916.341.7760 Offices located in California and Nevada
Wood Rodgers, Inc. • www.woodrodgers.com

TECHNICAL MEMO
To: Nora Gamino (City of Bishop) and Deston Dishion (City of Bishop) From: Eric Toschi P.E. (Wood Rodgers, Inc.)
CC:

Date: September 5, 2025
Project Name: City of Bishop – Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Condition Assessment FINAL
Subject: Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations and Recommendations

1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Bishop (City) engaged Wood Rodgers, Inc. (Wood Rodgers) to conduct a structural condition assessment of the Chamber of Commerce Building (Building) located at 690 North Main Street in Bishop, California. This assessment was prompted by a life-safety report from Willdan Engineering, which recommended further structural evaluation due to concerns about the building’s integrity.

Wood Rodgers performed both qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the approximately 55-year-old structure, which comprises of three distinct sections. The assessment concluded that the overall condition of the building is POOR and may be nearing the end of its service life. Numerous structural deficiencies were identified, warranting further investigation, retrofitting, or potential replacement.

Key findings include:
 Potentially overstressed structural components, particularly in the second-floor framing of the A-frame section, where joists may exceed allowable load limits under both dead and live loads.  Unclear structural connections between second-floor joists and supporting elements, raising additional safety concerns.
 Southern addition framing relies on foundation posts located near the creek’s edge, some of which have been undermined by creek activity, compromising structural stability.

Due to these concerns, Wood Rodgers recommends that the second floor of the A-frame not be occupied or used for storage. The findings also support Willdan Engineering’s concerns regarding the safety of the southern addition.

The report concludes that further evaluation, retrofitting, or potential replacement of the building is necessary to address the identified safety risks. The recommended path forward depends on the City’s long-term goals—whether to preserve the entire building, retain select portions, or pursue full demolition and replacement. Each option will require careful consideration of environmental, structural, and financial factors.
196
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 2 1.2 INTRODUCTION
The City of Bishop (City) maintains the Chamber of Commerce Building (Building) located at 690 North Main Street, Bishop, California. The Building was originally built sometime in the 1970’s based on documentation from the City. A description of the Building is found in Section 2 of this Memo. The assessment was initiated after the City received a life-safety report by Willdan Engineering, located in Appendix D, recommending a structural evaluation of the Building. In response, the City engaged Wood Rodgers, Inc. (Wood Rodgers) to perform a structural condition assessment of the Building.

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this technical memorandum is to:

1. Document field observations identified structural deficiencies, and structural members of concern for the existing Building, as observed by Wood Rodgers.

2. Review the structural drawings and calculations of the original A-Frame Building. Original building drawings for the South or East Additions were not available for our review

2. Determine the Building dead, live, and snow design loads based on the current California Building Code (CBC) and compare it to original A-Frame loading in the original calculations. Perform a quantitative analysis using the current California Building Code (CBC) design loads and the original design loads of some of the structural framing and connections identified as concerns during the site observation. Wind and seismic loads were not determined after determining existing member capacities may be limited based on dead, live and snow.

3. Determine if the area “Red Tagged” may be occupied or should remain unoccupied.

4. Provide an opinion if the area “Red Tagged” could be retrofitted to become occupied again.

5. Asses the condition of the original A-frame and small east Addition portion of the Building.

Wood Rodgers has performed the above tasks as a basis for providing an evaluation of the subject Building. We strive to perform our professional services in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. Our site scope was limited to visual observation of the Building. The findings summarized in this technical memorandum are based upon visual observation of the Building and did not involve a comprehensive engineering survey, as we did not remove finishes, gypsum board or plywood materials, nor did we operate any testing equipment. The condition assessment and recommendations represent our professional opinion.

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BULDING
Wood Rodgers’ visual survey included the Building located as noted in the introduction. Refer to Appendix A - Observation Photos (attached) for the extents of Wood Rodgers’ visual observation.

Field Observations Time & Date: 12:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Engineer: Eric Toschi, P.E. (Wood Rodgers)
City Representative: Nora Gamino (City of Bishop) and Deston Dishion (City of Bishop) A Wood Rodgers’ engineer conducted a visual observation of the Building at the location described in the Introduction. The purpose of this assessment is to evaluate the structural condition of the building, identify any structural members exhibiting signs of distress, review visible structural connections, examine 197
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 3 foundation bearing conditions adjacent to the Creek, and document any grading issues of concern. The observation also included a general evaluation of the overall condition of the building.

A City Representative provided Wood Rodgers access to the Building and was present at the beginning and end of the visual survey of the Building. Photos were taken as part of the Building observations.

Elements of the Building were rated from GOOD to POOR as defined below in Table 1 - Condition Rating Criteria.

Table 1 - Condition Rating Criteria
Condition Rating Criteria
Rating Rating Description
GOOD
No major deficiencies: numerous minor deficiencies associated with cosmetic distress; age of construction is showing in cosmetic distress; periodic observation recommended,
FAIR
Few major deficiencies; numerous minor deficiencies; age of construction is showing in cosmetic distress; periodic observation and potential repair could extend service life.

POOR
Major deficiencies may lead to or cause deterioration of the Building such that loss of stability of structure could occur; retrofit repair, replacement, or removal recommended.

2.1 GENERAL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM OF BUILDING
The Building consists of three sections, the original A-frame, a small addition built to the A-Frame to the East, and a larger addition built to the South. For the remainder of the report the original building portion will be referred to as the “A-Frame”, the East addition will be called “small addition”, and the larger southern addition will be called “addition”. The following is a description of the structural framing system for each section:

A-Frame
For this portion of the building, we have access to partial structural drawings and calculations, included in Appendix C. The rough plan dimensions of the A-frame structure measure approximately twenty-eight feet in width (North-South direction) and thirty-two feet in length (East-West direction). However, the current configuration of the A-frame does not match the original building plans. This discrepancy will be addressed further in Section 4 – Conclusion.

The A-frame is constructed with wood framing and sits on a continuous concrete stem wall foundation around its perimeter. According to the original plans, the perimeter was initially supported by isolated footings beneath posts. At some point after the original construction, continuous footings appear to have been added, although there is no documentation available to confirm when this modification occurred or how the existing rafter-floor system is connected to these footings.

The roof is built using pairs of 2x10 rafters spanning in the North-South direction, spaced four feet on center. These rafters extend from the foundation up to the ridge, forming a steep pitch that 198
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 4 creates a sixty-degree angle at the first-floor level. The roof structure also serves as a sloping exterior wall on the North side and partially on the South side.

The second floor is located approximately eight feet six inches above the finished elevation of the first floor. It is framed with 2x12 floor joists that are lapped and connected to each side of the roof rafters, forming collar ties. This floor spans the full interior length of the building, with a staircase positioned on the East side of the A-frame. Per the original drawings, the first floor is framed with pairs of 2x10 joists bolted to each set of roof rafters. The roof rafters, second floor, and first floor are all bolted together at their lap joints, forming the characteristic A-frame structure.

Originally, the frames were tied to isolated perimeter footings, but it remains unclear whether they are currently tied to the concrete stem wall. The underfloor area of the first floor was not accessible during the observation, so additional modifications to the floor framing may exist but could not be verified.

The West wall of the A-frame consists primarily of glass and a single door, framed with vertical and horizontal wood members including king studs and headers between the openings. While this may have been part of the original design, the existing drawings do not provide sufficient clarity to confirm this. The East wall is a wood stud-framed wall, likely constructed with 2x studs spaced sixteen inches on center. It includes a small window above the second floor and a door providing access to the East.

The South side of the A-frame roof was modified during the construction of the South Addition.

These modifications will be discussed in detail in Section 2.2, Field Observations.

Addition
The Addition is a section of the Building, that was constructed at an unknown time, extending southward from the original A-frame structure. Its approximate plan dimensions are twenty-eight feet by forty-eight feet. The first floor is framed with 6x10 girders running in the North-South direction, spaced three feet on center. These girders are supported by a masonry stem wall along the West and East edges of the Addition. On the South side, the foundation consists of a combination of CMU stem wall — located approximately six feet north of the South wall—and isolated post supports situated about two feet north of the same wall. This portion of the floor projects beyond the perimeter CMU stem wall and is exposed to the exterior.

The southern foundation elements are positioned near the flow line of the South Fork Biship Creek (Creek) that runs East-West, which will be discussed in greater detail in Section 2.3. Within the crawl space formed by the perimeter CMU stem walls, the floor joists are supported by isolated post foundations. The exterior walls appear to be conventionally framed with wood studs spaced sixteen inches on-center.

The roof framing consists of 6x12 purlins spanning in the same direction as the first-floor floor joists. These purlins are aligned with the existing A-frame roof rafters, approximately four feet oncenter. At the South end, the purlins bear on the exterior wall, which is supported by the cantilevered first-floor framing. At the North end, the purlins connect to the A-frame structure, a detail that will also be addressed in Section 2.3. The roof has a relatively flat slope, and the direction of drainage remains unclear.

199
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 5 Small Addition
The Small Addition was added to the East of the A-frame at an unknown time. The rough plan dimensions of this portion of the building are nine feet by four feet. During the observation this portion of the building was not accessible, and a majority of the framing was not observed. Based on the small visible portion of this section of the Building, it is most likely wood framed stud walls, and a simple wood framed roof with a minimal slope. The first floor is wood framed with joists at sixteen inches on center, supported by wood beam girders on isolated posts. The isolated posts do not appear to have a foundation, and this is noted in Section 2.4.

2.2 FIELD OBSERVATIONS OF A-FRAME
The observed components of the A-Frame section of the Building ranged in condition from FAIR to POOR.

Observed A-Frame deficiencies are as follows:
 At some locations of the roof, the framing was in contact with earth (refer to Photo 1). The roof rafter shows signs of dry rot. It also appears the bolted connection to the floor joist has been modified or was not built per the original drawings. This framing condition is considered POOR.

Photo 1 – Southeast corner of roof in contact with earth  Of the roof rafters visible, there are seven locations where the existing 2-2x10 roof rafters have been spliced and would not be considered 2-2x10 continuous members. The original structural drawings did not allow splices of the roof rafters within three to four feet of the second-floor height. For examples of the different splice conditions refer to Phots 2 thru 4. In Appendix B, there is a quantitative study of the load carrying capacity of the existing roof rafters where the rafter splice may be within three feet of second floor. The results of this quantitative study will be addressed in the Section 4 – Conclusion.
200
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 6 Photo 2 – At West side roof gable, roof rafter splice with larger separation.

Photo 3 – At West side roof gable, roof rafter splice just below collar tie connection. 201
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 7 Photo 4 – North side roof at interior rafter splice below collar tie connection.  At the West end gable roof, the roof rafter collar tie member, at the approximate height of the second-floor level, has been removed on the first two roof rafters (refer to Photos 5 and 6). In addition, both of these roof rafters contain splices similar to the description of the bullet point above. In Appendix B, there is a quantitative study of the load carrying capacity of the existing roof rafters due to the modification of the collar tie and the splice. The results of this quantitative study will be addressed in Section 4 – Conclusion.

Photo 5 – Collar tie cut off at gable end roof rafter.
202
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 8 Photo 6 – Collar tie cut off at roof rafter adjacent to the storefront glass.  At the first-floor connection between the roof rafter and the first-floor joist, either the connection has been modified, or the structure was not built to the original drawings. At some locations, the floor joist has been cut at the added wood deck, eliminating the original roof rafter to first-floor tie that forms the A-frame (refer to Photo 7). In addition, according to the original drawings, the bolted connection between the rafter and floor was to have a minimum of three (3) bolts. Based on the visible connections, it appears there is only (1) one (refer to Photo 7 and 8). This framing condition is considered POOR.
203
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 9 Photo 7 – Northwest corner of first floor to rafter connection, one (1) bolt and floor joist cut.

Photo 8 – Northeast corner of first floor to rafter connection, one (1) bolt.  Around the perimeter of the A-frame building, no visible under-floor venting occurred at the firstfloor level (refer to Photos 9 to 11). This condition is considered POOR. 204
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 10 Photo 9 – Northwest corner of first floor foundation. No ventilation.

Photo 10 – North Foundation stem wall of first floor foundation. No ventilation. 205
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 11 Photo 11 – Northeast corner of first floor foundation. No ventilation.  The existing 2-2x12 floor joists and their connection to the 2-2x10 roof rafters are not currently visible, making it not possible to verify the integrity of the original framing system during the observation. Based on the observed connection between the 6x12 roof joist of the Addition and the existing 2-2x10 A-frame roof rafter (see Photos 20 and 21), there is concern that modifications may have been made to the original floor joist connections. At this time, the load paths in this area — particularly how roof and floor loads are transferred to supporting members — cannot be clearly determined. This specific connection and its structural implications will be addressed in Section 4 – Conclusion.

2.3 FIELD OBSERVATIONS OF ADDITION
The observed components of the southern Addition section of the Building ranged in condition from FAIR to POOR. Observed A-Frame deficiencies are as follows:

At the southwestern section of the Addition, Creek erosion has undermined the soil beneath the post foundations supporting the floor girder and joists in three distinct locations. As a result, the existing footings no longer provide effective support for the posts (refer to Photos 12 to 14). This loss of bearing capacity poses a significant structural concern and is discussed in Section 4 – Conclusions. 206
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 12 Photo 12 – Concrete footing undermined by Creek.

Photo 13 – Soil erosion by Creek under concrete footing 207
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 13 Photo 14 – Soil erosion by Creek under concrete footing  At the southeastern edge of the Addition, the adjacent Creek flows are eroding the soil, and the embankment is encroaching toward the post foundations. Without mitigation, continued erosion from the Creek will likely compromise the soil supporting these posts, potentially leading to loss of structural support—similar to the condition previously described (see Photos 15 and 16). If erosion persists, there is a risk that the Creek flows may eventually undermine the footing beneath the CMU stem wall (refer to Photo 16), which could result in significant structural instability. This condition is considered FAIR to POOR
Photo 15 – Creek within three feet of the post foundation. 208
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 14 Photo 16 – Creek encroaching on post foundations.
 The existing 6x12 roof joists were only observed at their end connection to the A-frame structure; the remainder of the joists are concealed and not accessible for observation. Notably, staining is visible on the interior sheetrock ceiling, which appears to be the result of past or ongoing roof leaks (see Photos 17 and 18). From the rooftop, the slope direction and drainage configuration are unclear (refer to Photos 19 and 20), which may be contributing to the potential for water intrusion. Given the suspected leaks and lack of apparent drainage, there is concern that the roof joists may be affected by dry rot or other moisture-related damage. Further evaluation of this condition will be provided in Section 4 – Conclusion.
209
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 15 Photo 17 – Visible signs of possible roof leak.

Photo 18 – Visible signs of possible roof leak.
210
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 16 Photo 19 – No apparent roof slope or drainage.
 The existing 6x12 roof joists connect to the existing A-Frame roof joists & floor joists via a bearing seat and bolts (refer to Photos 20). The connection of the 6x12 roof joist to the A-Frame is not evident other than the steel bearing seat. There may be additional connectors that are not visible.

The original floor joist of the A-Frame would not have extended horizontally past the end of the A-Frame roof rafters. In addition, on one side of the 6x12 roof joists, the existing floor joists would not lap directly to the 6x roof joist due to the difference in widths of the 6x roof joists (5”) and double 2x roof rafter (3”) [Refer to Photo 21].There may be additional connectors and members that are not visible, but a load path to support members cannot be discerned at this time. This particular connection and support will be addressed in more detail in Section 4 – Conclusion. 211
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 17 Photo 20 – 6x12 Roof Joist connection at A-Frame Floor.

Photo 21 – 6x12 Roof Joist connection at A-Frame Floor showing additional members  Around the perimeter of the Addition portion of the Building, no visible under-floor venting occurred at the first-floor level (refer to Photos 22 to 23). This condition is considered POOR 212
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 18 Photo 22 – No visible venting of First floor level on West side of Addition Photo 23 – No visible venting of First floor level on West side of Addition

2.4 FIELD OBSERVATIONS OF SMALL ADDITION
The Small Addition portion that was observed was in FAIR condition. However, there is no apparent concrete foundation supporting the floor girder posts. The posts seem to be either embedded into the soil for support, or the finished soil elevation has been raised resulting in burying the top of the foundation below the current grade. This creates a POOR condition with the posts in contact with soil (Refer to Photo 24).
213
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 19 Photo 24 – Showing post in contact with earth and no apparent foundation

DESIGN LOADS
As part of this technical memorandum, Wood Rodgers conducted a study to compare the original design dead loads of the A-Frame structure—based on the original structural calculations—with the current insitu dead loads, which reflect the existing finishes. Refer to Appendix C for the original A-Frame documents provided by the City and Appendix B, pages B-2 and B-3 for Wood Rodgers Dead Load takeoffs.

Since the original design, additional gypsum board finishes have been installed on the roof rafters and floor joists of the A-Frame structure. These additions have increased the dead load beyond the values accounted for in the original design.

Table 2 – Design Load Summary presents a comparison between the original and current dead loads.

The implications of the increased dead load are discussed further in Section 4 – Conclusion.

Table 2 - Design Load Summary of A-Frame
Allowable Stress Design (ASD) Loads
Level
Original 1970
(Appendix C)
Current In-situ
Percent Increase
Roof Dead Load
in pounds per square
foot (psf)

8.6 psf 12.5 psf 45%
Floor Dead Load
in pounds per square
foot (psf) 7.0 psf 13.0 psf 85%
214
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 20 CONCLUSION

4.1 CONCLUSIONS – A-FRAME MEMBER AND CONNECTION QUANTITAIVE ANALYSIS As shown in Table 2 above, there has been an increase in dead load design weight from the original AFrame structural design. In addition to the increase in dead load design weight, during our site observation splices of the double 2x10 roof rafters were noted outside of the allowed splice zone in the original calculations. There were also collar tie members forming the original “A-frame” that were removed after completed construction.

In order to evaluate the effects of the increase dead load and the modifications to the structure a quantitative analysis was performed on the roof framing members, floor framing members, and the connections between the floor joists and roof joists. The calculations in Appendix B use current 2022 California Building Code load cases and show the following:
 Page B-6 of the calculations analyzes a single 2x10 roof rafter spanning fourteen feet with in-situ dead loads and current City snow loads. This analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of the removed collar ties, the splices in the 2x10, and the increase in dead load.  Page B-6 of the calculations also analyzes the original A-Frame design with bending in a single 2x10 roof rafter. This analysis was performed to evaluate the effects the splices in the 2x10 roof rafter and the increase in dead load.
 Page B-7 of the calculations analyzes the existing double floor joists with the increase in dead load.
 Page B-8 of the calculations analyzes the existing bolted connection between the existing floor joist and roof rafters with the increase dead load of only the A-Frame. It also analyzes the existing bolted connection between the existing floor joist and roof rafters with the increased load from the southern Addition 6x12 roof joist.

The structural analysis presented on pages B-6 to B-8 highlights several concerns regarding the roof and floor framing system. The location of splices in the roof rafters and the absence of collar ties are critical to the structural integrity. When a splice occurs in the double 2x10 rafters without a collar tie, the bending capacity of the rafter may be exceeded, potentially exceeding the limit states defined by the California Building Code (CBC). Similarly, the existing double 2x12 floor joists may be overstressed when subjected to full dead and live loads along their entire span, suggesting that their bending capacity could be exceeded under design loading. Additionally, the bolted connection between the roof rafter and the floor joist appears to be approaching or exceeding its allowable load capacity. This issue becomes even more pronounced when the load from the 6x12 roof joists of the southern Addition is transferred onto the existing roof rafter.

The following are additional considerations when evaluating the Condition of the A-frame:
 There are conditions where the existing roof framing is in contact with soil. The grading around the building needs to be modified so there is a minimum of eight inches of clearance between the roof and finished grade.
215
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 21  The existing bolted connection at the first-floor joist to the roof rafter appears to be a single bolt.

The original structural drawings call for a three bolted connection. The single bolt connection could exceed its load carrying capacity.
 The first floor does not appear to have any underfloor crawl space ventilation. This potentially has caused or will cause dry rot or other moisture-related damage to the first-floor structural framing.
 The structural building plans provided by the City do not match the existing configuration. In particular, the second-floor dimensions. There are no permits or other documentation for a second-floor expansion.
 Where the existing A-frame second floor joists meet the A-Frame roof rafters and the Addition 6x12 roof joist, there is not clear load path between these members and a support member.

Potentially this could be relying on a single 2x10 A-frame roof rafter to support the loads from the A-frame and Addition.

For more information, refer to FINAL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS – Section 5.

4.2 CONCLUSIONS – ADDITION MEMBER AND CONNECTION QUANTITAIVE ANALYSIS There were no original structural calculations or drawings for the southern Addition. In order to understand the carrying capacity of the existing members Wood Rodgers performed structural calculations for select members. These calculations are in Appendix B, using current 2022 California Building Code load cases, and show the following:

The following are additional considerations when evaluating the Condition of the Addition:
 Page B-9 of the calculations analyzes the existing 6x12 roof joist with the calculated dead load and the City uniform snow load. The existing lumber grade of the 6x12 member is unknown, so several common grades have been assumed for bending strength and shear strength.  Page B-9 of the calculations analyzes the existing 6x10 floor joist with the calculated dead load, floor live load and the City specified uniform snow load. The existing lumber grade of the 6x10 member is unknown, so several common grades have been assumed for bending strength and shear strength. This calculation assumes the existing posts have full bearing foundations, have not been undermined by the Creek, and the joists cantilever (extend past support) maximum two feet six inches.
 Page B-10 of the calculations analyzes the existing 6x10 floor joist with the calculated dead load, floor live load and the City specified uniform snow load. The existing lumber grade of the 6x10 member is unknown, so several common grades have been assumed for bending strength and shear strength. This calculation assumes the existing posts do not provide any support, the joists bear on the masonry stem wall for support, and the joists cantilever (extend past masonry stem support) maximum six feet.
 Page B-10 also analyzes the bearing load to the stem wall footing if the posts supporting the floor joists near the Creek were removed and did not provide support.  Page B-11 details a possible load path for the 6x12 roof joist to the A-Frame members. The loading to the load path shows the lack
The results presented on pages B-9 to B-11 indicate that the existing roof joists and floor joists may be approaching or exceeding the limit states defined by the CBC. The post foundations, which were originally 216
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 22 intended to support the floor joists, have been undermined by Creek erosion. With these supports compromised or removed, the bending capacity of the 6x10 floor joists may be exceeded when subjected to full dead and live floor loads across their entire span. Additionally, where the 6x12 roof joist connects to the existing A-frame structure, the imposed loading is substantial. The unknown nature of this connection raises concerns about its adequacy and structural reliability.

The following are additional considerations when evaluating the Condition of the Addition:
 The first floor does not appear to have any underfloor crawl space ventilation. This potentially has caused or will cause dry rot or other moisture-related damage to the first-floor structural framing.
 There is evidence of the roof leaking or past leaks. This potentially has caused or will cause dry rot or other moisture-related damage to the roof structural framing. If this damage occurs in the 6x12 roof joists, the potentially reduced carrying capacity of the possible over-stressed members is greater.
 Where the existing A-frame second floor joists meet the A-Frame roof rafters and the Addition 6x12 roof joist, there is not clear load path between these members and a support member.

Potentially this could be relying on a single 2x10 A-frame roof rafter to support the loads from the A-frame and Addition.

For more information, refer to FINAL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS – Section 5. 5 FINAL CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the qualitative and quantitative assessment, the overall condition of the Building is rated as POOR and nearing the end of its service life. All three sections of the structure exhibit numerous deficiencies that warrant further evaluation, retrofitting, and/or replacement. Several roof and floor framing members are either approaching or already exceeding their load-carrying capacities as defined by the California Building Code.

A particular concern is the load-carrying capacity and structural support of the second-floor framing in the A-frame. The bending strength of the second-floor joists is exceeded when subjected to the full extent of both dead and live loads along their entire span. This overstress was identified in the original structural calculations.

With the addition of in-situ finishes, the dead load increases, further exacerbating the overstress condition. These calculations, along with the increased stress levels, are documented on page B-6 of Appendix B. Additionally, the connection between the second-floor joists and the supporting structure is unclear and raises further structural concerns.

Based on this information, Wood Rodgers recommends that the second floor of the A-frame not be occupied or used for any form of storage.

Upon reviewing the southern addition, it is evident that the existing first-floor framing relies on the foundation posts for structural support. As such, Wood Rodgers concurs with the findings presented in the Willdan Engineering life-safety report, particularly regarding the occupancy-related concerns associated with this portion of the structure.
217
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 23 The path forward hinges on the City’s objectives—whether to preserve the entire building, retain select portions, or pursue complete demolition and replacement. Each carries unique challenges and financial implications that should be thoroughly evaluated during the planning and decision-making process.

The following offer possible solutions separated into a few scenarios:

Scenario 1 – Complete Removal of the Southern and Small Eastern Additions, Retaining the A-Frame  Environmental and Permitting Considerations
Removing the southern Addition may satisfy the regulatory Authorities overseeing the Creek, allowing it to return to a more natural path. This approach could facilitate a more expedited permitting process.
 Structural Retrofitting of the A-Frame
Retrofitting the A-frame is a complex undertaking with many unknowns. To assess the structural integrity, all interior finishes must be removed to expose the roof, second floor, and wall framing. Underfloor access hatches will be required to inspect the first-floor framing, and exterior potholes will be necessary to determine the existing footing configuration. As-built structural plans must be developed before any analysis can begin.

The scope of structural review is extensive, as outlined in our report.  Code Compliance Upgrades
During retrofitting, additional structural elements will need to be upgraded to meet current seismic and wind lateral bracing codes.
 Additional Professional Services Required
Non-structural issues will require input from other consultants, including Architects, Mechanical and Plumbing Engineers, and Civil Engineers. These professionals will address concerns such as underfloor ventilation, exterior grading, ADA-compliant accessibility, and other site-specific requirements
SCENARIO 2 – Partial Removal of the Southern Addition and Retention of the A-Frame  Environmental and Permitting Considerations
Partial removal of the southern Addition may create a suitable setback from the Creek.

However, this could lead to complex negotiations with the Authorities. A clear understanding of jurisdictional boundaries from the Creek’s edge is essential. If the setback is sufficient, the project may fall solely under City jurisdiction, simplifying the permitting process.  Structural Assessment and Retrofitting
Similar to Scenario 1, interior finishes of the retained Addition must be removed to expose structural elements. Underfloor access and potholes will be required to evaluate the existing post footings and continuous footings. The A-frame will also undergo the same structural review and retrofitting as described in Scenario 1.
 Code Compliance Upgrades
Both the A-frame and retained Addition will require upgrades to meet current seismic and wind lateral bracing standards
 Additional Professional Services Required
As with Scenario 1, a multidisciplinary team will be needed to address non-structural concerns such as ventilation, grading, ADA compliance, and potential environmental issues. 218
City of Bishop
Chamber of Commerce Building Structural Observations & Condition Assessment 24 SCENARIO 3 – Full Demolition and Replacement of the Building at Present Site or New Site  Design and Construction Advantages
Constructing a new building offers significant advantages over retrofitting an existing structure. Without the constraints imposed by pre-existing conditions, design professionals have greater flexibility to implement optimal solutions. These benefits are further enhanced if the project is located on a new site with favorable environmental factors and standard permitting processes.
 Demolition Requirements
Full demolition of the current structure is required before new construction at the present site can begin.
 Environment and Permitting Considerations
Removing the existing building—particularly the portions impacting the creek—may allow the creek to return to a more natural course and possibly help satisfy regulatory authorities.

However, the footprint of any replacement structure would need to be significantly smaller than the current building. To meet oversight requirements related to the creek, the new building’s footprint may be limited to an area only slightly larger than the existing A-Frame structure.

Even if this approach aligns with regulatory expectations, determining an acceptable footprint size could still be a lengthy and cost-prohibitive process. Ultimately, the most efficient and cost-effective solution may be to relocate the new building to a site with fewer environmental constraints and a more favorable permitting landscape.

From a cost perspective, Scenario 3 may be the most cost-effective option. It presents the fewest challenges related to unknown conditions, design complexities, construction logistics and environmental concerns when considering a different site for a new building. In contrast, Scenarios 1 and 2 could result in significantly higher initial costs due to selective predesign demolition, extensive site observations, engineering fees, and numerous uncertainties – all before completing final retrofit design documents.

Retrofitting an existing building, especially one that is over fifty years old, is inherently difficult and often unpredictable.

If Scenario 1 or 2 is chosen, 85% of the structure may need to be removed to provide a stable structure that complies with current building codes. It is possible that it is determined that a retrofit solution is not feasible and the structures need to be completely replaced after exposing and reviewing the existing framing and connections not observed in this condition assessment.

This Technical Memorandum presents our findings and recommendations regarding the observed condition of the Chamber of Commerce Building. We remain available to provide further details or support as needed. Please feel free to contact our office with any questions.

Regards,
___________________________ __________________________
Eric Toschi, PE Anthony Johnson, PE, SE
Senior Engineer – Structures Principal Structural Engineer 219

APPENDIX

APPENDIX A

OBSERVATION PHOTOS
A-1
220
=
=
= =
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
= =
=
=
=
= =
=
=
=
=
=
=
==

= 3KRWR/RFDWLRQ

)HHW
)
?6ROXWLRQV?7HFKQRORJ\?3KRWR3URFHVVRU?7HPSODWH?3KRWR3URFHVVRUB/D\RXWVDSU[ 30DUFJLVBVHUYLFHS
/RFDWLRQ0DS
6HUYLFH/D\HU&UHGLWV
:RUOG,PDJHU\

0D[DU0LFURVRIW
:RUOG%RXQGDULHVDQG3ODFHV
(VUL
1257+ +(5(*DUPLQL3&
l
&LW\RI %LVKRS&KDPEHURI &RPPHUFH
A-2
A-FRAME PORTION.

ORIGINAL BUILDING

PRIOR TO ANY

ADDITIONS
A-FRAME PORTION OF BUILDING 221
City of Bishop- Chamber of Commerce
1: a frame entrance
TH000299.JPG
2: a frame roof in contact with ground
TH000301.JPG
3: a frame entry bolt connection
TH000304.JPG
4: a frame entry bolt connection
TH000305.JPG
5: a frame entry bolt connection
TH000306.JPG
6: a frame entry bolt connection
TH000307.JPG
A-3
222
City of Bishop- Chamber of Commerce
7: a frame bottom cut at rafter
TH000308.JPG
8: a frame exterior2 2x Roof Rafter spliced
TH000309.JPG
9: a frame exterior2 2x Roof Rafter spliced
TH000310.JPG
10: a frame exterior2 2x Roof Rafter spliced
TH000311.JPG
11: a frame foundation
TH000312.JPG
12: a frame floor roof and foindation
TH000314.JPG
A-4
223
City of Bishop- Chamber of Commerce
13: a frame exterior face rafter
TH000319.JPG
14: a frame rafter splice
TH000320.JPG
15: a frame rafter splice
TH000321.JPG
16: a framw roof rafter splice
TH000342.JPG
17: no apparent ridge
TH000343.JPG
18: a frame main window
TH000355.JPG
A-5
224
City of Bishop- Chamber of Commerce
19: a frame main window
TH000356.JPG
20: a frame main window
TH000357.JPG
21: exterior roof rafter splice
TH000358.JPG
22: possible modification to original a frame collar tie removed
TH000360.JPG
23: possible modification to original a frame collar tie removed
TH000361.JPG
24: possible modification to original a frame collar tie removed
TH000362.JPG
A-6
225
City of Bishop- Chamber of Commerce
25: a frame roof rafter splice
TH000363.JPG
26: interior a frame from entrance
TH000364.JPG
27: interior a frame from entrance
TH000365.JPG
28: interior a frame from entrance
TH000366.JPG
29: interior a frame from entrance
TH000367.JPG
30: interior a frame from entrance
TH000368.JPG
A-7
226
City of Bishop- Chamber of Commerce
31: interior a frame from entrance
TH000369.JPG
32: interior a frame from entrance
TH000370.JPG
33: interior a frame from entrance
TH000371.JPG
34: interior a frame from entrance
TH000372.JPG
35: a frame second floor from stair
TH000400.JPG
36: a frame second floor from stair
TH000401.JPG
A-8
227
City of Bishop- Chamber of Commerce
37: a frame second floor from stair
TH000402.JPG
38: a frame second floor from stair
TH000403.JPG
39: a frame second floor from window
TH000405.JPG
40: a frame second floor from window
TH000406.JPG
41: exterior of building
TH000407.JPG
42: exterior of building
TH000408.JPG
A-9
228
City of Bishop- Chamber of Commerce
43: exterior of building
TH000409.JPG
44: exterior of building
TH000410.JPG
45: exterior of building
TH000411.JPG
46: exterior of building
TH000412.JPG
47: exterior of building
TH000413.JPG
48: exterior of building
TH000414.JPG
A-10
229
=
= =
==
=
=
=
=
=
=
= =
=
=
=
= = =
=
=
==
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
= =
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
==
=
=
= =
= = = =

= 3KRWR/RFDWLRQ

)HHW
)
?6ROXWLRQV?7HFKQRORJ\?3KRWR3URFHVVRU?7HPSODWH?3KRWR3URFHVVRUB/D\RXWVDSU[ 30DUFJLVBVHUYLFHS
/RFDWLRQ0DS
6HUYLFH/D\HU&UHGLWV
:RUOG,PDJHU\

0D[DU0LFURVRIW
:RUOG%RXQGDULHVDQG3ODFHV
(VUL
1257+ +(5(*DUPLQL3&
l
&LW\RI %LVKRS&KDPEHURI &RPPHUFH
A-11
Addition to original
A-Frame building
referenced as
"Addition" Southern ADDITION PORTION OF BUILDING 230
City of Bishop- Chamber of Commerce
1: addition 3 to stream
TH000292.JPG
2: addition post with no support
TH000293.JPG
3: addition post with no support
TH000294.JPG
4: addition post with no support
TH000295.JPG
5: addition post with no support
TH000296.JPG
6: addition post with no support
TH000297.JPG
A-12
231
City of Bishop- Chamber of Commerce
7: addition end support
TH000298.JPG
8: addition side
TH000300.JPG
9: addition first floor
TH000302.JPG
10: no apparent lateral this wall line
TH000303.JPG
11: addition opposite side
TH000316.JPG
12: addition opposite side
TH000317.JPG
A-13
232
City of Bishop- Chamber of Commerce
13: a frame connection at addition
TH000322.JPG
14: addition evidence of water inflitration
TH000325.JPG
15: addition evidence of water inflitration
TH000326.JPG
16: rear addition wall lateral bracing
TH000327.JPG
17: rear addition wall lateral bracing
TH000328.JPG
18: under floor addition
TH000329.JPG
A-14
233
City of Bishop- Chamber of Commerce
19: under floor addition
TH000330.JPG
20: under floor addition
TH000331.JPG
21: under floor addition
TH000334.JPG
22: a frame from addition roof
TH000335.JPG
23: addition roof
TH000336.JPG
24: addition roof
TH000337.JPG
A-15
234
City of Bishop- Chamber of Commerce
25: addition roof
TH000338.JPG
26: addition roof
TH000339.JPG
27: addition roof
TH000340.JPG
28: addition roof drainage
TH000341.JPG
29: addition roof joist bearing seat
TH000345.JPG
30: addition roof joist bearing seat
TH000347.JPG
A-16
235
City of Bishop- Chamber of Commerce
31: has a frame floor been modified
TH000348.JPG
32: has a frame floor been modified
TH000349.JPG
33: has a frame floor been modified split in floor joist at bolted connection
TH000350.JPG
34: foindation only appears 10 deep
TH000351.JPG
35: 8 wide opening how is additin and a frame supported TH000352.JPG
36: large split in floor joist near bolt
TH000354.JPG
A-17
236
City of Bishop- Chamber of Commerce
37: interior addition from main section
TH000373.JPG
38: interior addition from main section
TH000374.JPG
39: interior addition from main section
TH000375.JPG
40: interior addition from main section
TH000376.JPG
41: interior addition from main section
TH000377.JPG
42: interior addition from main section
TH000378.JPG
A-18
237
City of Bishop- Chamber of Commerce
43: interior addition from main section
TH000379.JPG
44: interior addition from main section
TH000380.JPG
45: interior addition from main section
TH000381.JPG
46: interior addition from 1st office
TH000382.JPG
47: interior addition from 1st office
TH000383.JPG
48: interior addition from 1st office
TH000384.JPG
A-19
238
City of Bishop- Chamber of Commerce
49: interior addition from 1st office
TH000385.JPG
50: interior addition from 1st office
TH000386.JPG
51: interior addition from 1st office
TH000387.JPG
52: interior addition from 1st office
TH000388.JPG
53: interior addition from 2nd office
TH000389.JPG
54: interior addition from 2nd office
TH000390.JPG
A-20
239
City of Bishop- Chamber of Commerce
55: interior addition from 2nd office
TH000391.JPG
56: interior addition from 2nd office
TH000392.JPG
57: interior addition from 2nd office
TH000393.JPG
58: interior addition from 2nd office
TH000394.JPG
59: interior addition from 2nd office
TH000395.JPG
60: interior addition from 2nd office
TH000396.JPG
A-21
240
City of Bishop- Chamber of Commerce
61: interior addition from 2nd office
TH000397.JPG
62: interior addition from 2nd office
TH000398.JPG
63: interior addition from 2nd office
TH000399.JPG
64: exterior of building
TH000415.JPG
65: exterior of building
TH000418.JPG
A-22
241
City of Bishop- Chamber of Commerce
1: small addition to a frame
TH000313.JPG
2: small a frame addition no visible foundation
TH000315.JPG
3: addition opposite side
TH000318.JPG
A-23

SMALL ADDITION

TO MAIN ORIGINAL

A-FRAME SMALL ADDITION TO A-FRAME PHOTOS

SMALL ADDITION

TO MAIN ORIGINAL

A-FRAME
242

APPENDIX

APPENDIX B

DEAD AND LIVE LOAD TAKEOFF
AND

QUANTITATIVE MEMBER AND

CONNECTION ANALYSIS
B-1
243
Job No: 8715005
Subject: A-Frame 2nd Floor Framing Loading Criteria
Project: City of Bishop - Chamber of Commerce Bldg
Page No:

Design By: ECT
Date: 08/2025
In-Situ Load Data - A-Frame Second Floor- Refer to Table 2 in Tech Memo Location: Second Floor
Slope: n/a
Slope Factor: n/a
Dead Loads

ITEM MATERIAL LOAD (PSF)
Floor Finish Carpet W1≔ 1.0 ⋅ psf
Sheathing Sheathing W2≔ 4 ⋅ psf
Insulation Allowance W3≔ 1.0 ⋅ psf
Ceiling Gypsum Board with Framing W4≔ 3.0 ⋅ psf
Sprinklers Not Applicable W5≔ 0 ⋅ psf
Mechanical & Electrical Allowance W6≔ 1.0 ⋅ psf
Miscellaneous Allowance W7≔ 1.0 psf
Framing:

Joists 2-2x12 @ 48"oc W8≔ 2.0 psf
Beams Not Applicable W9≔ 0.0 psf
Total Dead Loads
Joists Wsp≔ W1+ W2+ W3+ W4+ W5+ W6+ W7+ W8= 13 psf
Beams Wp≔ Wsp+ W9= 13 psf
Floor Live Load
Lflr≔ 50 psf Office without additional allowance for Partitions Lflr_orig≔ 40 psf Floor Live Load from original calculations B-2
244
Job No: 8715005
Subject: A-Frame Roof Framing Loading Criteria
Project: City of Bishop - Chamber of Commerce Bldg
Page No:

Design By: ECT
Date: 08/2025
In-Situ Load Data - A-Frame Roof - Refer to Table 2 in Tech Memo Location: A-Frame
Slope: Approximately 60 degrees
Slope Factor: 1.41 (This accounts for the weight not being on a horizontal surface) Dead Loads

ITEM MATERIAL LOAD (PSF)
Roofing Metal Roof W1≔ 3.0 ⋅ psf
Sheathing 2x4 @ 3'-6"oc with 5/8" Sheathing W2≔ 2.5 ⋅ psf Insulation Allowance W3≔ 1.0 ⋅ psf
Ceiling Gypsum board W4≔ 2.5 ⋅ psf
Sprinklers Not Applicable W5≔ 0.0 ⋅ psf
Mechanical & Electrical Allowance W6≔ 1.0 ⋅ psf
Miscellaneous Allowance W7≔ 0.5 psf
Framing:

Rafters/Joists 2-2x10 @ 48"oc W8≔ 2.0 psf
Total Dead Loads to compare with Original Building Calculations and in Table 2 of Technical Memo:

Joists Wsp≔ W1+ W2+ W3+ W4+ W5+ W6+ W7+ W8= 12.5 psf
As part of the structural calculations the additional weight on the roof rafter from the materal being on a slope need to be added. This weight is added by the Slope Factor below:

Slope Factor W10≔ 4.5 psf
Joists Wsp_design≔ W1+ W2+ W3+ W4+ W5+ W6+ W7+ W8+ W10= 17 psf Roof Live Load (Snow)
Lr_Snow≔ 40 psf Reducible Cs≔ 0.4 Lr_sloping≔ Cs⋅ Lr_Snow= 16 psf Load duration incrase = 1.15
B-3
245
Job No: 8715005
Subject: 1st Floor Framing Loading Criteria
Project: City of Bishop - Chamber of Commerce Bldg
Page No:

Design By: ECT
Date: 08/2025
Load Data - 1st Floor (Based on Addition)
Location: First Floor
Slope: n/a
Slope Factor: n/a
Dead Loads

ITEM MATERIAL LOAD (PSF)
Floor Finish Carpet W1≔ 1.0 ⋅ psf
Sheathing Sheathing W2≔ 4 ⋅ psf
Insulation Allowance W3≔ 1.0 ⋅ psf
Ceiling Not Applicable W4≔ 0.0 ⋅ psf
Sprinklers Not Applicable W5≔ 1.0 ⋅ psf
Mechanical & Electrical Allowance W6≔ 1.0 ⋅ psf
Miscellaneous Allowance W7≔ 1.5 psf
Framing:

Joists 6x10 @ 36"oc W8≔ 4.5 psf
Beams Glulams W9≔ 0 psf
Total Dead Loads
Joists Wsp≔ W1+ W2+ W3+ W4+ W5+ W6+ W7+ W8= 14 psf
Beams Wp≔ Wsp+ W9= 14 psf
Floor Live Load
Lflr≔ 50 psf Office without additional allowance for Partitions B-4
246
Job No: 8715005
Subject: Addition Roof Framing Loading Criteria
Project: City of Bishop - Chamber of Commerce Bldg
Page No:

Design By: ECT
Date: 08/2025
Load Data - Roof/Ceiling
Location: Addition
Slope: n/a
Slope Factor: n/a
Dead Loads

ITEM MATERIAL LOAD (PSF)
Roofing Built Up W1≔ 3.0 ⋅ psf
Sheathing Sheathing W2≔ 3 ⋅ psf
Insulation Allowance W3≔ 1.0 ⋅ psf
Ceiling Gypsum Board W4≔ 3.0 ⋅ psf
Sprinklers Not applicable W5≔ 0.0 ⋅ psf
Mechanical & Electrical Allowance W6≔ 2.0 ⋅ psf
Miscellaneous Allowance W7≔ 1.0 psf
Framing:

Rafters/Joists 6x12 @ 48"oc W8≔ 4.0 psf
Beams Not Applicable W9≔ 0.0 psf
Slope Factor W10≔ 0.0 psf
Total Dead Loads
Joists Wsp≔ W1+ W2+ W3+ W4+ W5+ W6+ W7+ W8+ W10= 17 psf Beams Wp≔ Wsp+ W9= 17 psf
Roof Live Load (Snow)
Lr≔ 40 psf Reducible
Load duration incrase = 1.15
Ceiling Only Live Load = 0 psf
B-5
247
Job No: 8715005
Subject: Member Desgn Studies
Project: City of Bishop - Chamber of Commerce Bldg
Page No:

Design By: ECT
Date: 08/2025
A-Frame Portion of Building:

Existing Main Roof Rafters Not acting as Truss:

Simple uniform load with snow at Roof Rafter with 2' of tributary load. For example end Roof Rafter at West Entry.

Span: 14'-0" w = 2'(17 psf+16 psf) = 34 plf + 32 plf ( DL + Snow Load ) , typical Mmax = 1.62 ft-kips Vmax = 0.462 kips
From orginal calculations existing
2x Allowable bending = 1150 psi
2x10 @ 4'-0"cc (2'-0" maximum tributary load)
Mallow = 2.34 x 1.15 = 2.69 ft-kips Vallow = 0.88 kips x 1.15 = 1.01 kips Simple uniform load with snow at Roof Rafter with 4' of tributary load. For example end Roof Rafter at West Entry.

Span: 14'-0" w = 4'(17 psf+16 psf) = 68 plf + 64 plf ( DL + Snow Load ) , typical Mmax = 3.23 ft-kips Vmax = 0.924 kips
From orginal calculations existing
2x Allowable bending = 1150 psi
2x10 @ 4'-0"cc
Mallow = 2.34 x 1.15 = 2.69 ft-kips Vallow = 0.88 kips x 1.15 = 1.01 ki Existing Main Roof Rafters with Truss Action Using Current CBC Load Case Factors:

Existing Roof Rafters Mmax with varying load cases considering loads from the A-Frame only:

Mmax = 2100 ft-pounds ( DL + Roof Live Load = 12 psf)
Mmax = 2200 ft-pounds ( DL + Snow Load = 16 psf)
Mmax = 2800 ft-pounds ( DL + Floor Live Load = 40 psf)
Mmax = 2400 ft-pounds ( DL + 75% Floor Live Load = 40 psf + 75% Roof Live Load) Mmax = 2500 ft-pounds ( DL + 75% Floor Live Load = 40 psf + 75% Snow Load) The original roof rafters consisted of continuous double 2x10 members spaced at 4'-0" on center with limitations of splice locations noted in the original drawings.. In several observed instances, there is a clear splice in one of the 2x10s. The rafters may have been modified or the splices observed were original construction. There is a concern the observed splices may not fall within the specifed splice allowed area of the original drawings. As a result, the affected rafters now behave structurally as single 2x10 members rather than double members. The calculations above are a study of the rafters acting as a single 2x10 not a 2-2x10.

CONCLUSION:

Depending on the spliced conditions of the roof rafter framing of the A-Frame structure, the rafters are approaching—or potentially exceeding—the limit states defined by the California Building Code when considering the A-Frame loading only. Further investigation would be recommended to review results of above study and all joist splices.

A-Frame Portion of Building:

B-6
248
Job No: 8715005
Subject: Member Desgn Studies
Project: City of Bishop - Chamber of Commerce Bldg
Page No:

Design By: ECT
Date: 08/2025
A-Frame Portion of Building:

Existing Floor Joists without looking at additional Tension from Collar Tie:

Simple uniform load with dead load and office floor live load of 50 psf Span: 17'-4" w = 4'(13 psf+50 psf) = 52 plf + 200 plf ( DL + Floor Live Load ) , typical Mmax = 9.46 ft-kips Vmax = 2.18 kips
2-2x12 @ 4'-0"cc
From orginal calculations existing
2x Allowable bending = 1150 psi Mallow = 6.86 ft-kips Vallow = 2.14 kips Simple uniform load with dead load and floor live load of 40 psf from original calculations Span: 17'-4" w = 4'(13 psf+40 psf) = 52 plf + 160 plf ( DL + Floor Live Load ) , typical Mmax = 7.96 ft-kips Vmax = 1.84 kips
2-2x12 @ 4'-0"cc
From orginal calculations existing
2x Allowable bending = 1150 psi Mallow = 6.86 ft-kips Vallow = 2.14 kips Conclulsions:

The floor framing loading of the A-Frame structure is exceeding the capacity of the joists. This is noted in the original existing calculations, refer to snip below. There have been new dead loads added to the floor from the original design. The calculation above using a live load of 40 psf (based on original calculations) shows the maximum moment exceeds the allowable moment by 16%. This exceeds the historic building code maximum overstress of 5% allowed by the California Building Code.

A-Frame Portion of Building:

B-7
249
Job No: 8715005
Subject: Member Desgn Studies
Project: City of Bishop - Chamber of Commerce Bldg
Page No:

Design By: ECT
Date: 08/2025
A-Frame Portion of Building:

Study of Connection at Floor Joist acting as Collar Tie:

Maximum Tension Load in Floor Joist varying load cases considering loads from the A-Frame only Tmax = 1900 pounds ( DL + Roof Live Load = 12 psf)
Tmax = 2000 pounds ( DL + Snow Load = 16 psf)
Tmax = 2400 pounds ( DL + Floor Live Load = 40 psf)
Tmax = 2500 pounds ( DL + 75% Floor Live Load = 40 psf + 75% Roof Live Load) Tmax = 2600 pounds ( DL + 75% Floor Live Load = 40 psf + 75% Roof Live Load) Maximum Tension Load in Floor Joist varying load cases considering loads from the A-Frame and Addition Tmax = 3600 pounds ( DL + Roof Live Load = 12 psf for A-Frame & 20 psf for Addition) Tmax = 4500 pounds ( DL + Snow Load = 16 psf for A-Frame & 40 psf for Addition) Tmax = 3300 pounds ( DL + Floor Live Load = 40 psf)
Tmax = 3900 pounds ( DL + 75% Floor Live Load = 40 psf + 75% Roof Live Load) Tmax = 4600 pounds ( DL + 75% Floor Live Load = 40 psf + 75% Roof Live Load) Check the existing condition of the A-Frame bolted connection of 2-2x10 rafter main member with 2x12 member each side. There were two 5/8" diameter bolts Direction of load Parallel to grain in Floor Joist Allowable Tension for 2-5/8" diameter bolts = 1760 Pounds x 2 = 3520 Pounds
Direction of load Perpendicular to grain in Floor Joist Allowable Tension for 2-5/8" diameter bolts per original calculations = 950 Pounds x 2 = 1900 Pounds Tension Load in Floor Joist thru Roof Rafter at approximately 60 degrees (not perpendicular to grain) Allowable Tension for 2-5/8" diameter bolts = 1074 Pounds x 2 = 2148 Pounds Conclulsions:

Certain connections of the A-Frame structure are approaching—or potentially exceeding—the limit states defined by the California Building Code when considering the A-Frame loading only. When considering the loading from the Addition and the AFrame, certain connections of the A-Frame structure are potentially exceeding—the limit states defined by the California Building Code
Addition Portion of Building:

B-8
250
Job No: 8715005
Subject: Member Desgn Studies
Project: City of Bishop - Chamber of Commerce Bldg
Page No:

Design By: ECT
Date: 08/2025
Addition Portion of Building:

Existing Main Roof Joists:

Simple uniform load with snow, but does not account for sliding snow off of A-Frame roof which would increase the load.

Span: 27'-6" w = 4'(17 psf+40 psf) = 68 plf + 160 plf ( DL + Snow Load ) , typical Mmax = 21.6 ft-kips Vmax = 3.135 kips
6x12 @ 4'-0"cc
Assume DF #1 Lumber 1350 psi Mallow = 13.64 x 1.15 = 15.68 ft-kips Vallow = 3.58 kips x 1.15 = 4.12 kips Assume Select Structural
Lumber 1600 psi
Mallow = 16.16 x 1.15 = 18.59 ft-kips Vallow = 3.58 kips x 1.15 = 4.12 kips The roof joists may be undersized if full dead load and snow load occurs full length of existing roof joists unless the grade lumber is of a considerably higher grade than what would be anticipated for this type of building.

Existing Floor Joists:

Simple uniform floor load with office floor live load and point from wall, roof and snow at cantilever of floor joist ends. The Cantilever is for when the post footings have full bearing on soil Span: 8'-0" Cant: 2'-6"
( DL + Floor Live Load)
w = 3'(14 psf+50 psf) = 42 plf + 150 plf
(Roof/Wall Dead Load + Roof Snow Load)
P = 1.2 kips (DL) + 2.2 kips (Snow)
Load Combination: DL + Snow Mmax = 8.63 ft-kips Vmax = 3.47 kips Load Combination: DL + 0.75*Snow+0.75*Floor LL Mmax = 7.61 ft-kips Vmax = 3.12 kips 6x10 @ 3'-0"cc
Assume DF #1 Lumber 1350 psi Mallow = 9.31 x 1.15 = 10.71 ft-kips Vallow = 2.96 kips x 1.15 = 3.4 kips Assume Select Structural
Lumber 1600 psi
Mallow = 11.03 x 1.15 = 12.68 ft-kips Vallow = 2.96 kips x 1.15 = 3.4 kips Addition Portion of Building:

B-9
251
Job No: 8715005
Subject: Member Desgn Studies
Project: City of Bishop - Chamber of Commerce Bldg
Page No:

Design By: ECT
Date: 08/2025
Addition Portion of Building:

Existing Floor Joists:

Simple uniform floor load with office floor live load and point from wall, roof and snow at cantilever of floor joist ends. The Cantilever is for when no posts occur ouside of the CMU foundation Span: 8'-0" Cant: 6'-0"
( DL + Floor Live Load)
w = 3'(14 psf+50 psf) = 42 plf + 150 plf
(Roof/Wall Dead Load + Roof Snow Load)
P = 1.2 kips (DL) + 2.2 kips (Snow)
Load Combination: DL + Snow Mmax = 9.26 ft-kips Vmax = 3.62 kips Load Combination: DL + 0.75*Snow+0.75*Floor LL Mmax = 9.91 ft-kips Vmax = 3.66 kips 6x10 @ 3'-0"cc
Assume DF #1 Lumber 1350 psi Mallow = 9.31 x 1.15 = 10.71 ft-kips Vallow = 2.96 kips x 1.15 = 3.4 kips Assume Select Structural
Lumber 1600 psi
Mallow = 11.03 x 1.15 = 12.68 ft-kips Vallow = 2.96 kips x 1.15 = 3.4 kips The floor joists may be undersized when considering the maximum shear reaction at the support closest to the creek. The loading assumptions in the calculations above include snow load applied uniformly along the full length of the roof joists but do not account for additional loading from snow sliding off the adjacent A-frame roof. At the interface where the Addition meets the sloped A-frame roof, sliding snow from the A-Frame roof onto the Additional roof represents a typical snow design scenario included in the CBC and would increase the loading to the roof & floor joists from what is considered in these calculatons
Existing Foundation Load at CMU wall parallel to creek edge:

Pmax = 3.66 kips per load combination above Assume this load can be spread over 3 feet of CMU wall
wmax = 3.66 kips/3' = 1220 pounds per foot + 156 pounds per foot = 1376 pounds per foot on soil The uniform load shown above, on the soil, may be near to the allowable soil bearing capacity for the continuous footing under the CMU stem wall.. There is no available documents showing the depth or width of the continuos footing below the existing CMU stem wall. However based on the existing exposed wood post footings, we suspect the continuous footing have been built to similar depths. Eventually a similar condition of the creek undermining the continuous footing under the CMU stem wall could occur.

Addition Portion of Building:

B-10
252
Job No: 8715005
Subject: Member Desgn Studies
Project: City of Bishop - Chamber of Commerce Bldg
Page No:

Design By: ECT
Date: 08/2025
Addition Portion of Building:

Existing Main Roof Joist Connection at Existing A-Frame:

The photo below appears to be the typical connection of the Addition 6x12 roof joist to the existing Aframe portion of the building. We believe the 6x12 roof joists bear on a bent plate bearing seat (noted in photo below). The plate is connected with two small diameter lag screws into the existing 2-2x10 roof rafters of the A-Frame and one small diameter lag screw connects the plate to the 6x12 Addition roof joist
At the bearing seat, we assume 2-3/8" diameter lag screws into the end of the 2-2x10 Roof Rafters of the A-Frame support the shear plate to the rafter. The load limit for the two lag screws = 2x280 poundsx1.15 = 644 pounds. The load to the screws is the shear reaction from the roof joist, Vmax =

3.135 kips = 3135 pounds (shown abovev) and is considerablly higher than the load lmit of 644 pounds.

The bolts in the side member may be a load path, but it is unclear on how it resolves to a supporting structural member.

Conclulsions:

Certain elements of the Addition structure are approaching—or potentially exceeding—the limit states defined by the California Building Code.

Due to the absence of documentation specifying the lumber species or grade used in the Addition portion, the calculations presented in the preceding pages are based on engineering judgment regarding the likely species and grade of the structural members.

B-11
253

APPENDIX

APPENDIX C

A-FRAME BUILDING PARTIAL STRUCTURAL

CALCULATIONS AND DRAWINGS
C-1
Engineering Plans have been redacted from
publicly released document due to Federal
Copyright Law. Please contact the City Clerk for
more information.
254
C-13
255
C-14
256
C-21
257
C-22
258
C-23
259
C-24
260
C-25
261
C-26
262

APPENDIX

APPENDIX D

LIFE-SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT

BY WILLDAN ENGINEERING
D-1
263
City of Bishop Department of Building and Safety

Page 1 of 2 ends

Bishop City CouncilOctober 27, 2025

Bishop City Council
October 27, 2025