Agenda packet — Bradbury City Council, October 17, 2023 (part 1 of 2)

• F

BRADBURY
AGENDA
Regular Meeting of the Bradbury City Council
To be held on Tuesday, October 17, 2023
Closed Session Immediately Following
at the Bradbury Civic Center
600 Winston Avenue, Bradbury, CA 91008
OPEN SESSION 7:00 PM
Each item on the agenda, no matter how described, shall be deemed to include any appropriate motion, whether to adopt a minute motion, resolution, payment of any bill, approval of any matter or action, or any other action. Items listed as "For Information" or "For Discussion" may also be subject of an "action" taken by the Board or a Committee at the same meeting.

CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Mayor Barakat, Mayor Pro Tem Hale, Councilmembers Lathrop, Lewis & Bruny.

APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA: Majority Vote of City Council to proceed with City Business DISCLOSURE OF ITEMS REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 1090 & 81000 ET.SEQ.

1. PUBLIC COMMENT
Anyone wishing to address the City Council on any matter that is not on the agenda for a public hearing may do so at this time. Please state your name and address clearly for the record and limit your remarks to five minutes.

Please note that while the City Council values your comments, the City Council cannot respond nor take action until such time as the matter may appear on a forthcoming agenda.

Routine requests for action should be referred to City staff during normal business hours, 8:30am - 5:00pm, Monday through Friday, at 626.358.3218.

The City of Bradbury will gladly accommodate disabled persons wishing to communicate at a city public meeting. If special assistance is needed, please call the City Manager's Office (626.358.3218) 48 hours prior to the scheduled meeting.

ACTION ITEMS*

2. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items on the Consent Calendar are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion unless a Council Member request otherwise, in which case the item will be removed and considered by separate action. All Resolutions and Ordinances for Second Reading on the Consent Calendar, the motion will be deemed to "to waive the reading and adopt." A. Minutes: Regular Meeting, Tuesday, September 19, 2023.

B. Monthly Investment Report for the month of September 2023 C. Resolution No. 23-20. Demands & Warrants for October 17, 2023.

Ordinance No. 386: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Bradbury, California, Repealing and Readopting Chapter 9.29 of the Bradbury Municipal Code Relating to Reasonable Accommodations Policy and Procedures and Finding the Ordinance to be Exempt Pursuant to the Common Sense Exemption of CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)
E. Ordinance No. 387: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Bradbury, California, Adopting Chapter 9.30 of the Bradbury Municipal Code Relating to Density Bonus Laws and Finding the Ordinance to be Exempt Pursuant to the Common Sense Exemption of CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) F. Ordinance No. 388: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Bradbury, California, Amending the Bradbury Municipal Code Relating to Secondary Living Quarters and Finding the Ordinance to be Exempt Pursuant to the Common Sense Exemption of CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)3), CEQA Guidelines Section 15282(h), and Government Code Section 65852.21

3. PRESENTATION - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON'S RECAP OF WORK ON WOODLYN LANE
Southern California Edison will be present to recap their recent work on Woodlyn Lane.

4. PRESENTATION - SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS The SGVCOG Staff will be providing updates on the SGVCOG programs, accomplishments and goals for the upcoming year.

5. PRESENTATION - AN UPDATE BY CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER ON THE LEMON

AVENUE RESERVOIR
California American Water has been working toward the retirement of the Lemon Avenue Reservoir site, and the draft plans are now close to finalization. It is recommended that the City Council review the draft plans and provide any feedback. (
CC Regular Meeting 2023_10_17

6. FISCAL YEAR 2021-2022 ANNUAL FINANCIAL AUDIT REPORT
The City of Bradbury, per local and State law, must complete an annual audit of its financial activities. An independent audit was completed, and several internal control findings were reported. During the presentation of this item, Staff will be responding to these conditions and providing future resolutions. It is recommended the City Council receive and file the Annual Financial Report as presented.

7. AWARD OF BID FOR HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) requires local municipalities to prepare, adopt, maintain, and update (every 5-years) an approved Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP). A LHMP is the process of assessing vulnerabilities, risk, strategies for risk reduction, and assigning parties to carry out appropriate action. Furthermore, without an LHMP, the City of Bradbury (City) is ineligible to receive FEMA grant funds in the case of a disaster. The City is due for an update and recommends that the City Council approve a Professional Services Agreement with Atlas Planning Solutions for $42,980 to update the City's LHMP.

8. DISCUSSION ON FUNDING PROJECTS) WITH ANNUAL ALLOCATION OF CAL RECYCLE FUNDS
The City of Bradbury currently has a restricted fund of $9,818 from Cal Recycle, the State agency responsible for managing and promoting recycling and waste reduction efforts throughout California. It is recommended that the City Council direct Staff on how to proceed with expensing these restricted funds.

9. DISCUSSION ON BRADBURY NIGHT OUT
This item prompts a discussion on changing the date of Bradbury Night Out (BNO). After an analysis by City Staff, it is recommended that the City Council elect to change the date of BNO to mid-late June moving forward.

10. DISCUSSION ON LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
This item prompts a discussion on the City of Bradbury's law enforcement services. It is recommended that the City Council direct Staff on how to proceed.

10. MATTERS FROM THE CITY MANAGER

11. MATTERS FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY

12. MATTERS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Barakat
LA County Sanitation Districts
LA County City Selection Committee
Director of Bradbury Disaster Committee
So. California Joint Powers Insurance Authority
iviayor Pro Tem Hale
Councilmember Lathrop
League of California Cities
Duarte Community Education Council (CEC)
Councilmember Bruny
Area "D" Office of Disaster Management
Duarte Education Foundation
Foothill Transit
Councilmember Lewis

13. ITEMS FOR FUTURE AGENDAS

CLOSED SESSION

CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL

PUBLIC COMMENT - REGARDING CLOSED SESSION ONLY
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION REGARDING:

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - PENDING LITIGATION Pending Litigation pursuant to Government Code sec. 54956.9, (d)(1)
Grow Monrovia v. City of Bradbury - L.A. Superior Court Case No. 23STCP00128

REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION
ADJOURNMENT:

The City Council will adjourn to a Regular Meeting at the Bradbury Civic Center, 600 Winston Avenue, Bradbury, CA 91008 on Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 7:00 p.m. * ACTION ITEMS: Regardless of a staff recommendation on any agenda item, the City Council will consider such matters, including action to approve, conditionally approve, reject or continue such item. Further information on each item may be procured from City Hall. "I, Diane Jensen, City Clerk, hereby certify that I caused this agenda to be posted at the Bradbury City Hall entrance gate by 5:00pm on Friday, October 13, 2023."
Diant Jensen
! City Clerk - City of Bradbury
CC Regular Meeting 2023_10_17
F

BRADBURY

REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES
Regular Meeting of the City of Bradbury City Council
Tuesday, September 19, 2023
Bradbury Civic Center
CALL TO ORDER - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Bradbury was called to order by Mayor Barakat at 7:00pm followed by the Pledge of Allegiance lead by Councilmember Lewis.

ROLL CALL -
PRESENT: Mayor Barakat, Mayor Pro Tem Hale, Councilmembers Lathrop, Bruny & Lewis.

ABSENT: None.

STAFF: City Manager Kearney, City Clerk Jensen, Management Analyst Flores, City Planner Kasama, City Attorney Reisman and Assistant City Attorney Kranitz.

APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor Pro Tem Hale made a motion to approve the new agenda with Councilmember Lewis seconding that motion. Without any objections, the Council proceeded with the City of Bradbury business.

DISCLOSURE OF ITEMS REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 1090 & 81000 ET. SEQ. - In compliance with the California Political Reform Act, each City Councilmembers has the responsibility to disclose direct or indirect potential for a personal financial impact as a result of participation in the decision-making process concerning agenda items.

City Attorney Reisman stated he was not aware of any potential conflicts.

Public Comment - No Members of the Public in Attendance.

ACTION ITEMS*
Consent Calendar Approval Before voting on the approval of the Consent Calendar.

City Manager Kearney reported the Direct Deposit Payroll for City Manager in the September 19, 2023 Demands & Warrants should be $15,833.33 and not $18,533.33.

The totals for the page are correct; however, and based upon the correct figure of $15,833.33. Mayor Pro Tem Hale approved the newly clarified section and Councilmember Bruny seconded the approval.

City Council Minutes September 19, 2023
A. Minutes: Regular Meeting, Tuesday, August 15, 2023.

B. Resolution No. 23-18: Demands & Warrants for September 19, 2023.

C. Monthly Investment Report for the Month of August 2023.

It was moved to approve the Consent Calendar by Mayor Pro Tem Hale with Mayor Barakat seconding that motion. Motion passed 5:0.

AYES: Mayor Barakat, Mayor Pro Tem Hale and Councilmembers Lathrop, Bruny & Lewis.

NOES: None.

ABSENT: None.

Presentation - Citrus College
Citrus College Trustee Mary Ann Lutz and Superintendent Dr. Greg Schutz explained since opening in 1915 to present day, Citrus College has providing educations to over 200K residents from Pasadena to Claremont. They announced the new "First time student (any age) = Two Years Free Tuition" program and how they awarded af proximately 1890 degrees and 2200 certificates in the fields of science, business management, criminal justice, cosmetology, diesel tech, real estate and vocational nursing. Lastly, the Council was invited to visit their popular Theatre of Performing Arts and attend the next monthly "Workforce Development Tour" on October 20, 2023.

4. Authorization to extend the Lemon Avenue Trail Improvements around 1550 Lemon Avenue on Winston Avenue.

Engineer Dave Gilbertson of RKA explained that extending the current Lemon Avenue trail plans about 130' South of the Winston/Lemon intersection around the front of 1550 Lemon Avenue actually creates a safer ingress/egress point by providing greater visibility especially during the dark hours. The extension would also include an ADA ramp and a sign announcing the trail. The area around 1550 Lemon is not wide enough for the trail so an additional 3' pedestrian easement is required from the 1550 Lemon property. In exchange for this easement, the City agrees to reconstruct the "drive approach" area only on their driveway. The additional costs for these changes are $24,500.00 bringing total costs to $262,699.47.

Mayor Pro Tem Hale made motion to approve the trail extension, the additional costs associated with the extension, issuing a change order to the contractor doing the work or SDC Engineering and approving the Pedestrian Easement Agreement with 1550 Lemon Avenue. Councilperson Bruny seconded the motion which the Council passed unanimously with a 5:0 vote.

City Council Minutes September 19, 2023

5. Urgency Ordinance No. 385U and Regular Ordinance 387: Density Bonus Ordinances and Finding that Adoptions are Exempt from CEQA Under the Common Sense Exemption.

The State Density Bonus Law enables developers to have greater density than what the local zoning laws allow provided that affordable housing is included in the development.

Ihis Ordinance also provides for waivers of local development regulations as incentives for developers to provide affordable housing. The City does not have any density bonus provisions so the proposed Ordinance will help bring the City into compliance with State Law. Because the Density Bonus Law is subject to frequent amendments, the proposed Ordinance is to adopt the State law by reference which means the City will not have to amend its Ordinance every time the State makes an amendment. The Planning Commission considered the proposed regular Ordinance at its August 23rd meeting and adopted Resolution No. PC. 23-312 which recommends approval and adoption by City Council of the Urgency Ordinance No. 385U effective immediately and the regular Ordinance No. 387 to be introduced with a second reading and adoption scheduled for the next regular meeting on October 17, 2023.

Mayor Barakat opened and subsequently closed the Public Hearing due to no one from the public being present.

Councilmember Lathrop made a motion to approve the emergency Ordinance 385U with Councilmember Bruny seconding the motion. Because the vote requires a vote of 4:5, a roll call vote was performed. All councilmembers including the mayor passed the motion 5:0.

The regular Ordinance 387 was introduced by a motion from Mayor Pro Tem Hale and seconded by Councilmember Bruny. The motion passed unanimously with a 5:0 vote.

It was scheduled for a second reading and adoption at the next regular meeting on October 17, 2023.

6. Ordinance No. 386: Reasonable Accommodations Policy and Procedures Ordinance No. 386 and Finding that Adoption is exempt from CEQA under the Common Sense Exemption.

City Planner Kasama introduced Ordinance No. 386 to the Council. This ordinance requires local governments to make reasonable accommodations in land use and zoning regulations to reduce impediments to equal access to housing..

Mayor Barakat opened and subsequently closed the Public Hearing due to no one from the public being present.

Ordinance 386 was introduced by a motion from Mayor Pro Tem Hale and seconded by Councilmember Bruny. The motion passed unanimously with a 5:0 vote. It is scheduled for a second reading and adoption at the next regular meeting on October 17, 2023.

7. Ordinance No. 388: Amendment to Chapter 85 of the Bradbury Municipal Code Relating to Secondary Living Quarters and SB 9 Units and Findings that the Ordinance is exempt from CEQA.

Legislature has amended the laws relating to accessory dwelling units. Ordinance No. 388 amends the Bradbury Code to reflect State laws and resolves an interplay between SB 9 units and ADUs.

City Council Minutes September 19, 2023
It is recommended that the City Council hold a public hearing, determine that Ordinance No. 388 is exempt under CEQA, introduce the Ordinance, and schedule the 2nd reading and adoption for the next regular meeting on October 17, 2023.

Mayor Barakat opened and subsequently closed the Public Hearing due to no one from the public being present.

Councilmember Lewis made a motion to introduce the Ordinance and schedule the 2nd reading and adoption for the next regular meeting on October 17, 2023.

Councilmember Bruny seconded the motion which passed unanimously 5:0.

Discussion on Issuing Separate Addresses for Accessory Dwelling Units.

State Law allows ADUs to have separate utilities outside from the main house. Utility companies; however, require separate addresses from the main house if two separate meters are used.

As such, the City of Bradbury will use the "Letter A" behind the primary dwellings numerical portion of address. For example: 123A Main Street.

9. Approval of the JPA with LARA: Resolution No. 23-19 - Management Analyst Flores explained how the City of Bradbury is one out of 18 members comprising the Los Angeles Regional Agency or "LARA" which is administered by the Joint Powers Agreement or "JPA." The JPA also helps cities comply with the State's recycling laws which are amended often. The recent adoption of SB 1383 requires the PA to be amended and restated by the State to accommodate the necessary changes.

It is recommended that the City of Bradbury approve Resolution No. 23-19 which gives the City Manager the authorization to sign the revised JPA as amendments occur bypassing the need to bring before City Council each time there is an amendment.

Councilmember Lewis made the motion to approve Resolution No. 23-19 with Councilmember Bruny seconding the motion. The motion passed unanimously.

10. Discussion of the City's Investment Policy.

The City's Investment has gone through some change but nothing "structural." This is more of an update to current practices and what the City is doing. As the City Manager, City Treasurer and City Finance Director discussed the Policy, it became aware there was a large amount of money in the checking account and not only is it not making any money, but the FDIC does not insure above $250K. It was discussed to release a large portion of this account and roll it into something like a CD or Treasury Bill which is insured, very liquid and interest earning. Some of the funds could be put into LAIF until the checking balance was $250K.

Mayor Barakat suggested moving the Texas and BMW accounts into a 6-month account earning around 5.5%. The City Manager asked for formal approval to accomplish all of this after speaking with the City Treasurer. Mayor Pro Tem Hale made a motion giving formal approval and Councilmember Bruny seconded the motion. It passed unanimously 5:0.

City Council Minutes September 19, 2023

11. Recap on Bradbury Night Out.

It was decided during last month's council meeting to revisit this topic to ensure all councilmembers have time to consider whether July is the best month to have the event.

The end of July is one of the hottest months so the council will decide if changing the date to a month with traditionally less heat but still enough sunlight after 8:00pm so no one is walking in the dark which is unsafe.

The months of May, June and October were discussed but it was agreed to wait until the next regular meeting on October 17, 2023 to have a final vote.

12. Matters from the City Manager: None.

13. Matters from the City Attorney: None.

14. Matters from the City Council:

Mayor Barakat: None
Mayor Pro Tem Hale: Prevent burglaries in Bradbury.

Increase City's fence Height from 6"
Fence around perimeter with wrought iron curved tops
Councilmember Lathrop Planning Commission and City Council Retreat.

Councilmember Bruny None
Councilmember Lewis None

15. Items for Future Agendas:

A. Using Monrovia Police services
B. SCE at next council meeting
C. Cal Recycle Program

CLOSED SESSION
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION @ 8:11pm. Councilmembers, City Attorney Reisman and City Manager Kearney discussed the following:

A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - PENDING LITIGATION Pending Litigation pursuant to Government Code sec. 54956.9, (d)(1)
Californians for Homeownership, Inc. v. City of Bradbury - L.A. Superior Court Case No. 22STCP01381
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - PENDING LITIGATION Pending Litigation pursuant to Government Code sec. 54956.9, (d)(1)
Grow Monrovia v. City of Bradbury - L.A. Superior Court Case No. 23STCP00128 C. PENDING LITIGATION
Pending Litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(3) (Based on existing facts and circumstances, the legislative body of the local agency is meeting only to decide whether a closed session is authorized pursuant to paragraph (d) (2). (1 potential case).

City Council Minutes September 19, 2023
D. PENDING LITIGATION
Pending Litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(2) A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the legislative body of the local agency on the advice of its legal counsel, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation against the local agency. (1 potential case) E. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Government Code Section 54957 (b)(4); Title: Building & Safety F. EMPLOYEE DISCIPLINE
Consideration of employee discipline pursuant to Government Code section 54957.1(a)(5) (City Manager)
REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION: At 8:50pm, Closed Session ended - City Attorney Reisman reported session was "informative only" and no formal votes taken.

ADJOURNMENT At 8:52 pm, Mayor Barakat moved to adjourn the meeting and Councilmember Lathrop seconded the motion. The Regular City Council Meeting was adjourned to Bradbury Civic Center, 600 Winston Avenue, Bradbury, CA 91008 on Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 7:00pm.

SIGNED BY:

MAYOR RICHARD BARAKAT DATE
City of Bradbury
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK DIANE JENSEN DATE
City of Bradbury
City Council Minutes September 19, 2023
City of Bradbury
Monthly Investment Report for the month of September 2023

CASH ON DEPOSIT BY ACCOUNT CASH & INVESTMENTS ON DEPOSIT BY FUND Bank Accounts: Amount Maturity Interest Rate Amount
Wells Fargo Bank - General Checking $ 1,684,337.85 n/a 0% General Fund (101) $4,555,197.10 Utility Users Tax Fund (102)
Deposits Fund (103)
Investments: Long Term Planning Fee Fund (112)
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) $ 3,423,775.19 n/a 3.35% Technology Fee Fund (113) Gas Tax Fund (200)
SB 1 Gas Tax Fund (201)
Metro Credit Union $ 243,000.00 07.26.2023 5.55% Prop A Fund (203) Texas Exchange Bank Crowley CD 249,000.00 07.09.2024 0.50% Prop C Fund (204) BMW Bank of NA $ 248,000.00 12.10.2024 0.90% TDA Fund (205) Salal Credit Union Seattle Wash 09.29.2023 4.20% Sewer Fund (206) STPL Fund (208)
Recycling Grant Fund (209)
SB 1383 Organic Waste Recyclying(209) $20,103.00
Measure R Fund (210) $67,179.20
Measure M Fund (212) $84,895.05
Measure W Fund (213) $17,802.98
COPS Fund (215) $396,006.90
County Park Grant Fund (217) $9,297.89
CWPP Grant Fund (219) $19,516.01
ARPA Fund (220) $0.00
Total [$ 5,848,113.04] Total 5,848,113.04
I hereby certify that there are sufficient funds available to meet the City's obligations for the next three (3) months.

This report is prepared in accordance with the guidelines established in the Statement of Investment Policy adopted November 21, 2017 Submitted By: Reviewed By:

Kevin Kearney Laurie Stiver
City Manager Date City Treasurer Date
Revenues
Acct. 2022-23 2022-23 2023-24 2023-24
Number Account Description Budget YTD @ 06/30/2023 Budget YTD @ 09/30/2023 General Fund:
101-00-4000 Operating Transfers In #DIV/O! #DIV/O!
101-00-4010 Property Tax-Current Secured 490,000 494,100 490.000 8,115 101% 2%
101-00-4030 Property Tax-Current Unsecured 20,000 18,069 90% 22,000 20,307 92% 101-00-4050 Property Tax Prior Year #DIV/O! #DIVIO!
101-00-4060 Public Safety Augmentation F 11,000 12,419 3,382 113% 12,300 27%
101-00-4070 Delinquent Taxes 9,000 10,043 112% 9,000 0% 101-00-4100 Sales & Use Tax 3,500 2,679 77% 2,500 7%
101-00-4110 Franchise Fee-Cable TV 20,000 18,640 93% 18,500 4,553 25% 101-00-4111 PEG Fees 3,737 #DIV/O! 3,750 911 24%
101-00-4120 Franchise Fee-SC Edison 20,000 23,934 120% 25,000 0% 101-00-4130 Franchise Fee-SC Refuse 25,000 32,866 131% 38,000 10,058 26% 101-00-4140 Franchise Fee-SC Gas Co. 3,500 4,518 129% 5,000 0% 101-00-4150 Franchise Fee-Cal Am Water 50,000 45,469 91% 46,000 0% 101-00-4160 AB939 Refuse Admin. Fee 10,000 0% 20,000 0% 101-00-4190 Real Property Transfer Tax 35,000 40,184 115% 35,000 1,359 4% 101-00-4200 Motor Vehicle In-Lieu 145,000 152,883 105% 145,000 0% 101-00-4210 Dist & Bail Forfeiture 400 509 127% 400 27% 101-00-4220 Fines-City 2,500 18,343 734% 2,500 - 0%
101-00-4350 Business License 29,000 30,721 106% 29,000 23% 101-00-4360 Movie & TV Permits 15,000 32,960 220% 15,000 0% 101-00-4370 Bedroom License Fee 6,500 46,350 713% 6,500 0% 101-00-4410 Variances & CUPs 1,635 3,269 200% 1,635 0%
101-00-4420 Lot Line Adjustment/Zone Changes 3,800 0% 1,500 0% 101-00-4440 Subdivisions/Lot Splits 4,800 0% 1,500 0%
101-00-4460 Planning Dept. Review 36,000 28,864 80% 36,000 5% 101-00-4470 Building Construction Permit 100,000 143,770 144% 150,000 22,047 15% 101-00-4480 Building Plan Check Fees 100,000 37,569 38% 100,000 4,481 4% 101-00-4485 Landscape Plan Check Permit 10,000 4,168 42% 10,000 1,160 12% 101-00-4490 Green Code Compliance 25,000 16,142 65% 25,000 1,021 4% 101-00-4500 Civic Center Rental Fee 900 - 0% 900 900
101-00-4530 Environmental & Other Fees 2,500 1,854 74% 2,500 0% 101-00-4540 City Engineering Plan Check 90,000 71,569 80% 70,000 20,206 101-00-4600 Interest Income 12,000 90,418 753% 45,000 11,839 101-00-4700 Sales of Maps & Publications 107 #DIV/O! 10 0% 101-00-4800 Other Revenue 39,931 #DIV/O!
101-00-4850 Cal-Am Loan Repayment 4,500 4,820 107% 4,500 0% 101-00-4900 Reimbursements 15,000 34 0% 5,000 0%
101-00-4920 Sale of Prop. A Funds #DIV/O! #DIV/O!
101-20-4260 Housing Element Grant Reimbursement #DIV/O! 42,768 #DIV/O! 101-23-4950 Vacant Property Registry Fee : #DIV/O!
#DIV/O! -
101-24-4610 Donations #DIV/O! 500 #DIV/O!
Total General Fund Revenues 1301,535 110% 1,378,995 162,141 12% Utility Users Tax Fund:
102-00-4600 Interest 12,000 4,080 34% 12,000 0%
102-00-4830 Electric #DIV/O! #DIV/O!
12,000 4,082 34% 12,000 0%
Deposits Fund:
103-00-2039 Chadwick Ranch Development 60,000 0% #DIV/O! 103-00-2040 1901 Royal Oaks Dr. North #DIV/O! 20,000 #DIV/O! 60,000 #DIVO! - 20,000 #DIV/O!
Long Term Planning Fee Fund:
112-00-4490 Long-Term Planning Fee 7,500 1,921 26% 3,500 736 21% 112-00-4600 LTP Fee Interest Income 125 52 42% 125 0%
7,625 1.973 26% 3,625 20%
1 of 3
Revenues
Acct. 2022-23 2022-23 2023-24 2023-24
Number Account Description Budget YTD @ 06/30/2023 Budget YTD @09/30/2023 Technology Fee Fund:
113-00-4520 Technology Fee 17,500 11,688 67% 10,000 1,198 12% 113-00-4600 Technology Fee Interest Income 550 103 19% 550 0% 18,050 11,791 65% 10,550 1,198 11%
Gas Tax Fund:
200-00-4600 Interest 250 10 4% 250 0%
200-48-4260 Gas Tax 28,250 29,638 105% 28,250 13.525 48% 28,500 29,648 104% 28,500 13,525 47%
SB1 Gas Tax Fund:
201-00-4260 Gas Tax 19,700 18,863 96% 19,700 3,777 19%
201-00-4600 Gas Tax Interest 750 9% 750 0%
20,450 18,933 93% 20,450 3777 18%
Prop. A Fund:
203-40-4260 Prop. A Transit Funds 22,000 27,468 125% 22,000 6,183 28% 203-00-4600 Prop. A Transit Interest 600 287 48% 600 0% 22,600 27,755 123% 22,600 6,183 27%
Prop. C Fund:
204-48-4260 Prop. C Funds 18,000 22,784 127% 18,000 5,133 29% 204-48-4600 Prop. C Interest 350 173 49% 350 0%
18,350 22,957 125% 18,350 5,138 28%
Transportation Development Act Fund:
205-48-4260 TDA Funds 5,000 4,587 92% 5,000 413 8%
205-48-4600 TDA Interest 30 0% 30 0%
5,030 4,587 91% 5,030 8%
Sewer Fund:
206-00-4000 Transfers In #DIVIO! - 73,161 #DIV/O!
206-50-4600 Sewer Fund Interest 10,000 4
0% #DIV/O!
206-50-4606 Winston Ave. Assessment 74,423 73,161 98% #DIVIO! 84,423 73,165 87% 73,161 #DIV/O!
STPL Fund:
208-00-4600 STPL Interest 20 35% 20 0%
20 7 35% 20 0%
Recycling Grant Fund:
209-00-4260 Recycling Grant Funds 5,000 5,000 100% 5,000 0% 209-00-4600 Recycling Grant Interest 150 206 137% 150 0% 5,150 5,206 101% 5,150 : 0%
Measure R Fund:
210-48-4260 Measure R Funds 13,500 17,083 127% 13,500 2,651 20% 210-00-4600 Measure R Interest 1,200 527 44% 400 0%
-
14,700 17,610 120% 13,900 2,651 19%
Measure M Fund
212-48-4260 Measure M Funds 16,000 19,324 121% 16,000 2,651 17% 212-00-4600 Measure Interest 800 487 61% 400 0%
16,800 19,811 118% 16,400 2.651 16%
Measure W Fund
213-48-4260 Measure W Funds 50,506 76,454 151% 50,506 0% 213-48-4600 Measure W Interest 1,000 0% #DIV/O!
51,506 76,454 148% 50,506 0%
2083
Revenues
Acct. 2022-23 2022-23 2023-24 2023-24
Number Account Description Budget YTD @ 06/30/2023 Budget YTD @09/30/2023 Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) Fund:
215-23-4260 COPs Funds 100,000 224,440 224% 100,000 0%
215-00-4600 COPs Interest 5,500 3,221 59% 2,200 0%
105,500 227,661 216% 102,200 0%
County Park Grant:
217-00-4210 County Park Grant #DIV/O! #DIV/O!
-
217-00-4600 Grant Fund Interest Income 650 64 10% 650 0% 650 64 10% 650 0%
Fire Safe Grant:
219-00-4260 Community Wildfire Protection Plan 5,000 8,819 176% #DIV/O! 219-00-4600 Fire Safe Grant Interest Income 50 104 208% #DIV/O! 5,050 8,923 177% #DIV/O!
ARPA Fund:
220-00-4215 ARPA Revenues 175,000 0% #DIV/O!
220-00-4600 Interest Income 1,200 427 36%
#DIV/O!
176,200 427 0% #DIV/O!
Total Revenues_1,954,139 1,981,993 101% 1,688,926 291,569 17% 3 of 3
Expenditures
2022-23 2022-23 2023-24 2023-24
Account Description Budget YTD @ 06/30/2023 Budget YTD @ 09/30/2023 General Fund:

City Council Division:
101-11-6100 Events and awards 14,000 10,994 79% 14,000 12,631 90% 101-11-6110 City Newsletter 400 265 66% 400 0%
101-11-6500 Community Support (homelessness) :
4,000 3,600 90% 4,000 0%
18,400 14,859 81% 18,400 12,631 69%
City Manager Division:
101-12-5010 Salaries 150,000 153,333 102% 157,650 35,000 22% 101-12-5100 Benefits 58,099 60,662 104% 62,197 34,720 56% 101-12-6020 Meetings & Conferences 5,000 4,475 90% 5,000 2,150 43% 101-12-6025 Expense Account 1,500 320 21% 1,500 343 23% 101-12-6050 Mileage 1,000 1,098 110% 1,000 384 38%
101-12-6440 Cell Phone 900 975 108% 900 475 53%
216,499 220,863 102% 228,247 73,072 32%
City Clerk Division:
101-13-5010 Salaries 72,695 107,695 148% 73,570 20,476 28% 101-13-5100 Benefits 29,359 39,992 136% 21,267 7,027 33% 101-13-6020 Meetings & Conferences 689 #DIV/O! 1,500 29% 101-13-6050 Mileage 52 52% 500 0%
101-13-6210 Special Department Supplies 500 0% 500 : 0% 101-13-6220 Election Supplies 600 0% 600 0%
101-13-6225 Codification 3,500 2,916 83% 3,500 2,162 62% 106,754 151,344 142% 102,437 30,103 29%
Finance Division:
101-14-5010 Salaries 25,000 19,646 79% 22,500 4,522 20% 101-14-5100 Benefits - #DIV/O! #DIV/O!
101-14-6210 Special Department Supplies 500 420 84% 500 : 0% 101-14-6230 Contracted Computer Services 1,500 - 0% 1,500 1,281 85% 101-14-7010 Contracted Banking Services 4,000 3,597 90% 4,000 1,742 44% 101-14-7020 Contracted Audit Services 17,000 17,510 103% 17,500 8,035 46% 101-14-7040 GASB Reports 1,000 700 70% 1,000 700 70%
49,000 41,873 85% 47,000 16,280 35%
City Attorney Division:
101-15-6125 City Attorney-Planning 10,000 8,383 84% 10,000 6,070 101-15-7020 City Attorney Retainer 34,800 31,900 92% 34,800 17,971 101-15-7070 City Attorney Special Service 2,000 34,721 1736% 25,000 10,691 101-15-7075 Development Code Update 7,000 3,245 46% 7,000 2,145 101-15-7080 Seminars & Training 385 39% 1,000

2.000
101-15-7450 City Attorney-Code Enforcement 1,238 62% 1,000 314 56,800 79,872 141% 68,800 37,191
General Government Division:
101-16-5010 Salaries 60,331 67,321 112% 60,331 10,588
101-16-5100 Benefits 21,297 16,936 80% 21,297 2,943
101-16-6010 Seminars & Training 1,000 0% 1,000 667
101-16-6020 Meetings & Conferences 1,000 35 4% 1,000
101-16-6040 Transportation & Lodging 1,000 0% 1,000 : 0% 101-16-6050 Mileage 400 - 0% 400
101-16-6120 Postage 400 704 176% 400 1,948
101-16-6200 Office Supplies 2,000 5,224 261% 4,500 1,386 31% 101-16-6210 Special Departmental Supplies 16,100 0% 1,500 0% 101-16-6230 Computer & Website Services 4,000 12,136 303% 5,000 4,180 84% 101-16-6240 PERS UAL Payment 12,920 12,490 97% 12,920 10,918 85% 101-16-6241 PERS Replacement Benefit Contribution 3,000 2,858 95% 3,000 0% 101-16-6242 PERS SSA 218 Annual Fee 200 0%
101-16-6250 Copier & Duplications 1.048 #DIV
- 75 #DIV/O!
1 of 4
Expenditures
2022-23 2022-23 2023-24 2023-24
Account Description Budget YTD @ 06/30/2023 Budget YTD @09/30/2023 101-16-6300 insurance 40,000 42,609 107% 57,000 53,762 94% 101-16-6400 Utilities 5,500 10,197 185% 8,000 4,241 53% 101-16-6440 Telephone 2,000 2,210 111% 2,000 815 41%
101-16-6450 Building Operations 2,000 439 22% 1,000 1,962 196% 101-16-6460 Building & Cleaning Service 4,000 5,836 146% 4,000 2,680 67% 101-16-6470 Maintenance & Supplies 1,000 2,536 254% 4,500 919 20% 101-16-7435 Redistricting 743 #DIV/O! 59 #DIV/O!
101-16-6415 Street Signs 10,000 0% 10,000 0%
188,148 183,322 97% 199,048 97,143 49%
Engineering Division:
101-19-7230 Contracted Engineering Services 80,000 62,325 78% 70,000 12,542 18% 80,000 62,325 78% 70,000 12,542 18%
Planning, Zoning & Development Division:
101-20-6020 Meetings & Conferences 100
101-20-6120 Postage 300 0% 300 0%
101-20-6210 Special Department Supplies 300 0% 300 0%
101-20-6240 Environmental Filing Fees #DIV/O! #DIV/O!
101-20-7210 City Planner Retainer 46,800 31,200 67% 46,800 19,500 42% 101-20-7220 Contracted Building & Safety 90,000 82,800 92% 100,000 10,313 10% 101-20-7240 City Planner Special Service 10,000 8,828 88% 15,000 6,876 46% 101-20-7245 General Plan update 15,000 82,903 553% 20,000 20,404 102% 101-20-7075 Development Code Update #DIV/O! #DIV/O!
162,400 205,731 127% 182,500 57,093 31%
Parks & Landscape Maintenance Division:
101-21-7015 Royal Oaks Trail Maintenance 10,000 14,232 142% 10,000 5,231 52% 101-21-7020 City Hall Grounds Maintenance 7,500 4,836 64% 7,500 2,460 33% 101-21-7025 Trail Maintenance 10,000 8,978 90% 10,000 - 0% 101-21-7035 Mt. Olive Entrance & Trail 12,000 6,831 57% 12,000 3,677 31% 101-21-7045 Lemon/RO Horse Trail 7,000 1,651 24% 7,000 782 11% 101-21-7060 Street Tree Trimming 15,000 8,245 55% 5,000 0% 61,500 44,773 73% 51,500 12,150 24%
Public Safety Division:
101-23-6210 Special Departmental Services 50 52 104% 50 1 2% 101-23-6210 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 15,000 0%
101-23-7410 Contract Services Sheriff 128,000 107,295 84% 139,463 43,839 31% 101-23-7420 City Hall Security 3,500 2,976 85% 3,500 1,101 31% 101-23-7450 Code Enforcement 1,500 1,549 103% 1,500 318 101-23-7757 AED Purchase #DIV/O!
133,050 111,872 84% 159,513 45,259
Emergency Preparedness Division:
101-24-6010 Seminars & Training 100 44 44% 100 0%
101-24-6020 Meetings & Conferences 500 27 5% 500 0%
101-24-6030 Memberships & Dues 450 900 200% 450 900 200% 101-24-6100 Events & Awards 200 0% 200 0%
101-24-6470 Maintenance & Supplies 5,000 1.615 32% 5,000 1,502 30% 101-24-6480 Civic Center Generator 300 0% 300 1,752 584% 6,550 2,586 39% 6,550 4,154 63%
Animal & Pest Control Division:
101-25-7000 Animal Control Services 8,500 10,811 127% 10,500 5,032 48% 101-25-7010 Pest Control Services 500 0% 500 0%
9,000 10,811 120% 11,000 5,032 46%
Intergovernmental Relations Division:
101-30-6030 Memberships & Dues 11,000 11,479 104% 12,000 8,625 72% 11,000 11,479 104% 12,000 8,625 72%
2 of4
Expenditures
2022-23 2022-23 2023-24 2023-24
Account Description Budget YTD @ 06/30/2023 Budget YTD @ 09/30/2023 General Fund Totals_1,099,101 1,141,710 104% 1,156,995 411,275 36% Utility Users Tax Fund:
102-15-7075 Development Code Update
102-42-7630 NDES Stormwater Compliance 1,600 11,729 733% 16,000 32,047 200% 1,600 11,729 733% 16,000 32,047 200%
Deposits Fund:
103-00-2039 Chadwick Ranch Development 50,000 0% #DIV/O! 103-00-2040 1901 Royal Oaks Dr. North #DIV/O! #DIV/O!
50,000 0% - #DIVO
Long Term Planning Fee Fund:
112-20-7245 General Plan Expense #DIV/O! #DIVIO!
: #DIV/O! #DIV/O!
Technology Fee Fund:
113-20-4500 Permit Digitizing - #DIV/O! 900 #DIV/O!
113-20-7730 Website 5,000 1,800 36% 5,000 0%
113-20-7040 Non-Capitalized Equipment - Sonic Firewall 10,000 113-20-8120 Capital Equipment-Server & Copier 12,000 10,770 90% 14,000 4,687 33% 17,000 12,570 74% 29,000 5,587 19%
Gas Tax Fund:
200-48-6400 Utilities-Select System 11,000 11,357 103% 10,500 3,310 32% 200-48-6410 Street Lights 11,000 11,124 101% 10,500 5,521 53% 200-48-7000 PW Contract Services 600 406 68% 600 0%
200-48-7290 Street Sweeping 4,000 3,651 91% 4,000 0%
200-48-7750 Wild Rose Project 6,430 605 9% 6,430 0%
33,030 27,143 82% 32,030 8.831 28%
SB1 Gas Tax Fund:
201-48-7750 Wild Rose Project 61,070 20,055 33% 28,070 10,327 37% 201-48-7755 City Wide Slurry Seal #DIV/O! #DIV/O!
61,070 20.055 33% 28,070 10,327 37%
Prop. A Fund:
203-00-7600 Sale of Prop. A Funds
#DIV/O! - #DIV/O!
Prop. C Fund:
204-20-6030 Memberships & Dues 400 0% 400 0%
204-40-7325 Transit Services 8,449 7.744 92% 8,449 3,520 42% 204-48-7745 Royal Oaks North Curb Extension
204-48-7750 Wild Rose Project 21,220 604 21,220
30,069 8,348 28% 30,069 3,520 12%
Transportation Development Act Fund:
205-48-7045 RO Trail 5,000 856 17% 4,000 0%
205-48-7720 Lemon/RO Horse Trail Project #DIV/O! #DIV/O! 205-48-7735 Royal Oaks & Mt. Olive Trail Rehab. - ... #DIV/O! : #DIV/O! 205-00-7760 Return of Funds #DIV/O! #DIV/O!
5,000 856 #DIV/O! 4,000 #DIV/O!
Sewer Fund:
206-50-7601 Mt. Olive Lane Sewer Project #DIV/O! #DIV/O! 206-50-7602 DUSD Message Board #DIV/O! #DIV/O!
206-50-7606 Winston Ave Project ... .... #DIV/O! ....
#DIV/O!
#DIV/O! #DIV/O!
STPL Fund:
208-48-7750 Wild Rose Project 1,055 0% 1,055 0%
1,055 : 0% 1,055 0%
3 of 4
Expenditures
2022-23 2022-23 2023-24 2023-24
Account Description Budget YTD @ 06/30/2023 Budget YTD @ 09/30/2023 Recycling Grant Fund:
209-35-7300 Recycling Education 6,695 134% 5,000 0%
50000 6,695 5,000
Measure R Fund:
210-48-7750 Wild Rose Project 88,739 28,321 32% 7.571 9% 88,739 28,321 32% 32,739 7,571 9%
Measure M Fund
212-48-7750 Wild Rose Project 58,470 0% 93,470 0%
58,470 0% 93,470 0%
Measure W Fund
213-42-7630 NPDES Stormwater Compliance 50,506 47,537 50,506 50,506 47,537 94% 50,506 0%
Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) Fund:
215-23-7410 Contract Services Sheriff #DIV/O! #DIV/O!
215-23-7411 Contract CSO Services & Supplies 55,000 227% 149,528 0% 55,000 124804
227% 149,528 0%
County Park Grant:
217-21-7650 Civic Center Park 1,000 0% 1,000 0%
:
1,000 0% 1,000 0%
Fire Safe Grant 14-USFS-SFA-0053
219-21-7761 Community Wildfire Protection Plar 5,000 1,885 38% #DIV/O! 5,000 1,885 38% - #DIV/O!
ARPA Fund:
220-00-5000 Operating Transfers Out 132,500 0% #DIV/O!
220-00-6215 ARPA Expenses 5,300 : 0% #DIV/O!
137,800 0% #DIV/O!
Total Expenditures_1,699,440 1,431,733 84% 1,679,462 479,158 29% 4 of 4
RESOLUTION NO. 23-20

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRADBURY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVES THE DEMANDS & WARRANTS FOR CHECKS No. 17735 THROUGH No. 17759 AND APPROVING DEMANDS & WARRANTS FOR ACH and EFT TRANSMITTALS.

The City Council of the City of Bradbury does hereby resolve as follows:

Section 1. That the demands as set forth hereinafter are approved and warrants authorized to be drawn for checks from said demands in the amount of $53,215.37 on October 17, 2023 from the General Checking Account.

Check
Vendor & Invoice # Description Subtotals Totals
#
17735 Priority Landscape Oct. '23 Landscape Services: 1431.82 Inv# 15691 Bradbury Civic Center
232.01
Acct. 101-21-7020
Royal Oaks Drive North 446.16
Acct. 101-21-7015
Mount Olive Drive
Acct. 101-21-7035 597.33
Lemon Trail
156.32
Acct. 101-21-7045
17736 Coverall 394.00
Inv.#1527151425 Office Cleaning - Oct. '23
Acct. 101.16.6460
17737 Suresh Malkani Finance Director 23.75 hours 4507.16 Sept 2023 Acct. 101.14.5010
17738 Consensus E-Fax October '23 10.00
Inv. # 2765978 Acct. 101.16.6230
17739 Kevin Kearney Monthly Cell Phone -Oct. '23 75.00
Acct. 101.12.6440
17740 SGVCMA Annual Dues - City Manager 55.00
Due Oct '23 07.01.23-06.30.2024
Acct. 101.30.6030
17741 US Bank Safekeeping Fees Sept '23 33.00
Cust# 224 Acct. 101-14-7010
10005.00
17742 Jones and Mayer Retainer Fees - includes 12 hrs. 3000.00 Invoice #'s: Acct. 101.15.7020
118483 Total 1901 Royal Oaks
118484 Acct. 103.00.2040
118485 Total Code Enforcement 456.00
118486 Acct. 101.15.7450
118487 Total Grow Monrovia 171.00
118488 Acct. 101.15.7070
Total Lemon Trail 399.00
Acct.101.15.7070
Total Zoning/General Plan 5529.00
Acct. 101.15.7070
17743 RKA Engineer & Development 9'23 6919.50
Inv. # 33958R
1901 Royal Oaks Drive 367.50
Acct. 103.00.2040
City Engineering Services 6552.00
368 Old Ranch Road
393 Old Ranch Road
11 Deodar Lane
409 Deodar Lane
406 Mt. Olive Lane
1390 Sharon Hill
Acct 101.19.7230
Burrtec Street Sweeping Sept 23
17744 Acct. 213.42.7630 $338.92
Inv. #N011630979 Measure W
Cougar Mountain 8-hour Phone Training
17745 Inv.#4892 Acct. 101.14.6230 1250.00
17746 Collicutt Energy Generator @ City Hall 1554.81
Job ID# 54825 Battery Replaced 1000.95
37 Gallons Fuel 553.86
Acct. 101.24.6480
17747 RKA Consulting ity Engineering Service 514.50
Inv.#33957 cc.t 101.19.723
17748 RKA Consulting Lemon Avenue Trail 4350.35
Inv.# 33982 Acct.
17749 RKA Consulting NDES Coordination 230.00
Inv.# 33959 Acct. 102.42.7630
17750 RKA Consulting Bradbury /Wildrose St. Widening 3300.00 Inv.# 33981 Acct. 210.48.7750 SB1
17751 City of Monrovia Transportation Services 09/23 704.07 Inv. #2400445 Acct: 204.40.7325
17752 LA County Sheriff Law Enforcement Aug '23 11650.23 Inv.#240313EC Acct. 101-23-7410
17753 Post Alarm Services City Hall Fire Alarm 146.23
Inv #1622918 October 23
Acct. 101.23.7420
17754 Southern Calif Edison LS-1-ALLNITE (lights) 1104.18 No. 8004572845 Acct. 200-48-6410
17755 United States Treasury Form 941-V Taxes 1401.05
3rd Qtr.
17756 T-Mobile Internet (Hot Spot) Sept '23 25.00
Inv#975204096-26 Acct. 113-20-8120
17757 Pasadena Humane Society Animal Control Sept '23 1012.28 Inv#SEP2023Bradbury Acct. 101-25-7000
17758 Mario Flores Mileage Reimbursement 21.62
Aug - Oct 2023 Delivering PC Packets × 2
Purchasing envelopes / Walmart
Picking up at Shaffer Awards
To/From Printer- Business cards
33 miles total
Acct. 101.16.6050
17759 US Bank Visa September Statement 2023 2181.65
September 2023
CC - Kevin Kearney 975.90
Zoom Virtual Meetings 49.00
Acct 113.20.8120
Docusign 120.00
Acct. 101.16.6120
Omni La Costa-Conference 333.96
Acct. 101.12.6020
Staples-Copy Paper, Sharpener 69.51
101.16.6200
BJ's - City Manager lunch mtg 39.02
101.12.6020
Amazon - Toner for Copier 363.41
Acct. 101.16.6250
Just Answer 1.00
Acct. 101.16.6120
CC - Diane Jensen 994.97
Amazon -light flag pole, new 186.80
flag, label maker, envelopes,
mouse
Staples - box of copy paper 41.27
Amazon - Toilet Paper/paper 75.53
towels
Walmart - Dish Soap; bottled 86.21
water; hanging files; shelves
Amazon - 3-pack 3 ring binders 46.81
Smart and Final - Bug Sprays 28.71
and birthday, Kevin
Amazon - Binder dividers and 32.51
post its
Acct. 101.16.6020
American Water Bill 480.72
American Water Bill 16.41
Acct. 200.48.6400
CC - Mario Flores 168.07
Fedex - Business Cards 37.21
Walmart - Envelopes 33.86
Acct 101.16.6200
American Red Cross Training 97.00
Acct. 101.16.6010
Total Checks Amount: $53,215.37
Sciene that the demand ad set for here ate are approved and are alone one are a a Account.

DIRECT DEPOSIT - PAYROLL
OCTOBER 2023
ACH Kevin Kearney Salary $15,833.33 $11,582.96
City Manager Acct. 101.12.5010
Withholdings -$4.250.37
Acct. 101.00.2011
ACH Diane Jensen Salary $6,145.83 $4,087.86
City Clerk Acct. 101.13.5010
Withholdings -$1,581.67
Acct. 101.00.2011
PERS Pepra -$476.30
Acct: 101.13.5100
ACH Mario Flores Salary $5,416.66 $3,708.97
M. Analyst Acct. 101.16.5010
Withholdings -$1,287.89
Acct. 101.00.2011
PERS Pepra -$419.80
Acct: 101.16.5100
TOTAL: $19,379.79
EFT |EDD - October 2023 1648.28
State Tax 401.72
SDI 246.56
Acct. 101.00.2011
EFT PERS - October 2023 City Manager - Kearney 2707.50 4491.60 Acct. 101.12.5100
City Clerk - Jensen 948.30
Acct. 101.13.5100
M. Analyst - Flores 835.80
Acct. 101.16.5100
EFT IRS October 2023 Federal Tax Withholdings $3,529.85 7413.03 . Security (employee $1,544.57
;. Security (City $1,544.57
Medicare (Employee) $397.23
Medicare (City) $397.23
Acct. 101-00-2011
TOTAL - 13,552.91
Section 3. That the demands as set forth hereinafter are approved and warrants authorized to be drawn for electronic funds transactions from said demands in the amount of $4909.59 (EFT utility payments) on October17, 2023 from the General Checking Account.

ACH and ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFER (EFT)
UTILITIES - OCTOBER 2023
EFT Cal American Water 1775 Woodlyn Lane

10.02.23 Conf# 11413125817 Acct. 200.48.6400 785.05
EFT Cal American Water 600 Winston Avenue

10.02.23 Conf# 1141316283 Acct. 101.16.6400 289.82
EFT Cal American Water 2256 Gardi Street

10.02.2023 Conf# 1141313909 Acct. 200.48.6400 76.31
EFT Cal American Water 2410 Mt. Olive Street

10.02.2023 Conf# 1141312187 Acct. 200.48.6400 95.21
EFT Cal American Water 301 Mt. Olive Street

10.02.2023 Conf# 1141320907 Acct. 200.48.6400 224.49
So. Calif. Gas 600 Winston Ave. Oct 23
EFT

10.03.2023 Conf# 2760009 Acct. 101.16.6400 15.29
EFT Southern Calif. Edison 2298 Gardi Street

10.01.23 No. 8004395919 Acct. 200.48.6400 46.46
EFT Southern Calif. Edison 600 Winston City Hall
Due 10.11.2023 No. 8001919708 Acct. 101.16.6400 500.36
EFT Southern Calif Edison 600 Winston Ave. LS-1-
Due 10.23.2023 No. 8004572845 Allinite 1104.18
Acct. 200.48.6400
Charter Communications
EFT Spectrum Internet Oct. 23 169.98
Inv. #0101050092323
Due 10.10.2023 Acct. 101.16.6230
EFT Cal American Water City Hall Account
Due 10.30.2023 Acct 101.16.6400 471.14
EFT 1775 Woodlyn Lane
Due 10.30.2023 Cal American Water 1131.30
Acct. 200.48.6400
TOTAL EFT: $4909.59
Section 4. That the demands as set forth hereinafter are approved and warrants authorized to be drawn for employee health benefit payments from said demands in the amount of $3,920.76 (ACH benefit payments) on October 17, 2023 from the General Checking Account.

Vision Insurance Oct. 23 108.39
CM - Kearney (family)
Acct. 101.12.5100 61.07
ACH Vision Service VSP

10.04.2023 CC -Jensen (single) 23.66
#818837063
Acct. 101.13.5100
MA - Flores (single) 23.66
Acct. 101.16.5100
Life & ADD Oct. 23 28.95
CM - Kearney 9.65
Acct. 101.12.5100
ACH The Standard Ins.

10.04.2023 #6430650001 CC - Jensen 9.65
Acct. 101.13.5100
MA - Flores 9.65
Acct. 101.16.5100
Dental Insurance Oct. '23 206.34
CM - Kearney (family) 124.86
Acct. 101.12.5100
ACH Delta Dental

10.04.2023 Inv.# BE005706442 CC -Jensen (single) 40.74
Acct. 101.13.5100
MA - Flores 40.74
Acct. 101.16.5100
Health Insurance Oct. 23 3577.08
CM - Kearney (family) 1784.23
EFT AETNA Acct. 101.12.5100
CC -Jensen (single) 954.49

10.03.2023 Conf.# 44969604
Acct. 101.13.5100
MA - Flores (single) 838.36
Acct. 101.16.5100
TOTAL ACH: $3,920.76
RICHARD G. BARAKAT, MAYOR

CITY OF BRADBURY
ATTEST:
", Diane Jensen, City Clerk, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 23-18, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Bradbury, California, at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of September 2023 by the following roll call vote:" AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

DIANE JENSEN, CITY CLERK

CITY OF BRADBURY
CITY OF Richard G. Barakat, Mayor (District 3)
Richard T. Hale, Jr., Mayor Pro Tem (District 1,
BRADBURY Elizabeth Bruny, Council Member (District 5,
Bruce Lathrop, Council vember (District 4)
D. Montgomery Lewis, Council Member (District 2)
City of Bradbury
Agenda Report
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Kevin Kearney, City Manager
DATE: October 17, 2023
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 386 - ADOPTION

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRADBURY, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING AND READOPTING CHAPTER 9.29 OF THE

BRADBURY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO REASONABLE

ACCOMMODATIONS POLICY AND PROCEDURES AND FINDING THE

ORDINANCE TO BE EXEMPT PURSUANT TO THE COMMON SENSE
EXEMPTION OF CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(b)(3)
Attachment: Ordinance No. 386

SUMMARY
As set forth in the Ordinance, both federal and state laws require local governments to make reasonable accommodations in land use and zoning regulations to reduce impediments to equal access to housing. The City Council held a public hearing at the September 19, 2023, regular meeting and introduced Ordinance No. 386. It is recommended that the City Council waive the reading in full, authorize the reading by title only, and adopt Ordinance No. 386.

BACKGROUND
In January 2019, the City adopted Ordinance No. 362 that included Reasonable Accommodation Procedures for Disabled Persons. The State Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) has noted that these procedures need to be updated as part of the City's 6th Cycle Housing Element to eliminate subjectivity in the requirements.

Ordinance No. 386 updates the City's reasonable accommodations policy and procedures.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 2D
Ordinance No. 386 - Adoption Reasonable Accommodations Policy and Procedures October 17, 2023 Page 2 of 2
• alone Contin No Pc to a minen ta 2e2,y court adopt.

Ordinance, No. 386.

The City Council held a public hearing at the September 19, 2023, regular meeting and introduced Ordinance No. 386.

There will be no additional financial cost to the City as the Ordinance will implement what the City is already providing as required by State law.

CEQA
There is a common sense exemption to CEQA where it can be seen with certainty that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. As the Ordinance gives no greater development rights than what is provided for under State law, it will not create any significant effects on the environment and a notice of exemption should be filed under CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3).

RECOMMENDATION AND CITY COUNCIL ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council waive the reading in full, authorize the reading by title only, and adopt Ordinance No. 386:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRADBURY, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING AND READOPTING CHAPTER 9.29 OF THE

BRADBURY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO REASONABLE

ACCOMMODATIONS POLICY AND PROCEDURES AND FINDING THE

ORDINANCE TO BE EXEMPT PURSUANT TO THE COMMON SENSE
EXEMPTION OF CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(b)(3)
Attachment
Ordinance No. 386

ATTACHMENT
ORDINANCE NO. 386

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF BRADBURY, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING
AND READOPTING CHAPTER 9.29 OF THE

BRADBURY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO

REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS POLICY AND

PROCEDURES AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE TO

BE EXEMPT PURSUANT TO THE COMMON SENSE

EXEMPTION OF CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION
15061(b)(3)
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2D
ORDINANCE NO. 386

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRADBURY, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING AND READOPTING CHAPTER 9.29 OF THE

BRADBURY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO REASONABLE

ACCOMMODATIONS POLICY AND PROCEDURES AND FINDING THE

ORDINANCE TO BE EXEMPT PURSUANT TO THE COMMON SENSE
EXEMPTION OF CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(b)(3)
WHEREAS, the federal Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 and California's Fair Employment and Housing Act impose an affirmative duty on local governments to make reasonable accommodation in their land use and zoning regulations and practices when necessary; and
WHEREAS, Fair Housing Laws include the "Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988" (42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq.), including reasonable accommodation required by 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(3)(B), and the "California Fair Employment and Housing Act" (California Government Code Section 12900 et seq.), including reasonable accommodation required specifically by California Government Code Sections 12927(c)(1) and 12955(l), as any of these statutory provisions now exist or may be amended from time to time; and WHEREAS, the State Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) encourages cities to adopt written procedures for reasonable accommodation requests with respect to zoning regulations, permit processing, and building codes in light of the aforementioned laws and a city's affirmative duty to comply with fair housing laws; and WHEREAS, one of HCD's comments on the City's 6th Cycle Housing Element related to the City's procedures and findings regarding reasonable accommodations; and WHEREAS, the City shall provide a process for individuals with disabilities to make requests for, and be provided, reasonable accommodation, when reasonable accommodation is warranted based upon sufficient evidence, from the various City laws, rules, policies, practices and/or procedures of the City, including land use and zoning regulations; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of this chapter that, notwithstanding time limits provided to perform specific functions, application review, decision making and appeals proceed expeditiously, especially where the request is time sensitive, so as to reduce impediments to equal access to housing; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on proposed Ordinance No. 386 on August 23, 2023, at which time it considered all evidence presented, both written and oral; and
WHEREAS, after the close of the public hearing the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC 23-311 recommending that the City Council adopt the proposed Ordinance No. 386; and
WHEREAS, on September 19, 2023, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on proposed Ordinance No. 386 at which time it considered all evidence presented, both written and oral;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRADBURY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

A. The City Council finds that adopting the changes set forth in this Ordinance represents good planning practices because it provides individuals with disabilities reasonable accommodation in rules, policies, practices, and procedures to ensure the equal access to housing and facilitate the development of housing for individuals with disabilities.

B. The City Council further finds that this Ordinance is consistent with the City's General Plan.

SECTION 2. Chapter 9.29 of the Bradbury Municipal Code is hereby repealed and a new Chapter 9.29 titled Reasonable Accommodations Policy and Procedures is hereby added to the Bradbury Municipal Code to read as follows:

9.29 REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS POLICY AND PROCEDURES

9.29.010 Title, purpose, and applicability.

A. Title and Intent. The provisions of this Chapter shall be known as the Reasonable Accommodations Policy and Procedures. The intent of the Reasonable Accommodations Policy and Procedures is to provide flexibility in the application of the zoning and building codes for individuals with a disability when flexibility is necessary to eliminate barriers to housing opportunities. This Chapter will facilitate compliance with federal and state fair housing laws and promote housing opportunities for residents of Bradbury.

B. Purpose. The purpose of this Chapter is to establish a procedure for persons with disabilities seeking fair access to housing to make requests for a reasonable accommodation in the application of Bradbury's zoning and building laws, rules, policies, practices and procedures pursuant to Section 3604(f)(3)(b) of Title 42 of the United States Code (the "Fair Housing Act") and Section 12955 et seq. of the California Government Code (the "California Fair Employment and Housing Act"), which prohibit local government from refusing to make reasonable accommodations in policies and practices when these accommodations are necessary to afford persons with disabilities equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling.

Applicability. A request for a reasonable accommodation may include a modification or exception to the rules, standards and practices for the siting, -2- Ord. No.386
development and use of housing or housing-related facilities that would eliminate regulatory barriers and provide a person with a disability equal opportunity to housing of their choice.

9.29.020 Definitions.

For the purposes of this Chapter, unless otherwise apparent from the context, certain words and phrases have the meanings stated in this section. The definitions stated herein apply to differing forms of the word or phrase, as required by context.

A. "City Manager" means the City Manager or his designee.

B. "Eligible person" means a person with a disability, a representative of such person, or a developer of housing for persons with disabilities.

C. "Person with a Disability" is any person who has a physical or mental impairment that limits one or more major life activities; anyone who is regarded as having such impairment; or anyone who has a record of such impairment.

D. "Reasonable accommodation" for purposes of this chapter means providing individuals with disabilities or developers of housing for people with disabilities, flexibility in the application of land use and zoning and building regulations, policies, practices and procedures, or even waiving certain requirements when it Is necessary to eliminate barriers to housing opportunities.

E. "Request for Reasonable Accommodation" means a request to modify land use, zoning and building regulations, policies, practices, or procedures in order to give people with disabilities an equal opportunity to use and enjoy housing opportunities.

9.29.030 Notice to public.

Notice of the City of Bradbury's Reasonable Accommodations Policy and Procedures along with an application form shall be displayed in City Hall and on the City's website.

9.29.040 Reasonable accommodation request.

A. Any eligible person may request a reasonable accommodation in land use, zoning and building regulations, policies, practices and procedures by filing an application with the City Planner.

B. Requests for reasonable accommodation shall be in writing and provide the following information:

1. Name and address of the individuals) requesting reasonable accommodation;
-3- Ord. No.386

2. Name and address of the property owners);

3. Address of the property for which accommodation is requested;

4. Description of the requested accommodation and the regulation(s), policy or procedure for which accommodation is sought;

5. Reason that the requested accommodation may be necessary forthe individual(s) with the disability to use and enjoy the dwelling.

6. If necessary to reach a determination on the request for reasonable accommodation, the reviewing authority may request further information from the applicant consistent with fair housing laws, specifying in detail the information that is required. In the event that a request for additional information is made the thirty (30) day period to issue a decision is stayed until the applicant responds to the request
C. Any information identified by an applicant as confidential shall be retained ha manner so as to respect the privacy rights of the applicant and shall not be made available for public inspection.

D. If an individual needs assistance in making the request for reasonable accommodation, the City will provide assistance to ensure that the process is accessible.

E. While a request for reasonable accommodation is pending, all laws and regulations otherwise applicable to the property that is the subject of the request shall remain in full force and effect.

9.29.050 Timing of request.

A. A request for reasonable accommodation may be filed at any time that the accommodation may be necessary to ensure equal access to housing.

B. If the project for which the request is being made also requires one or more related discretionary approvals (including, but not limited to, design review, conditional use permit, variance, or subdivision), then to the extent feasible, the applicant shall file the request for reasonable accommodation together with the related application for discretionary approval.

9.29.060 Review procedures.

A. The City Planner shall act on requests for a reasonable accommodation and shall make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices, or services when those accommodations may be necessary to afford persons with disabilities equal opportunities to use and enjoy housing opportunities.
-4- Ord. No.386
B. The City Planner shall issue a written determination on a request for a reasonable accommodation within a timely manner but no later than thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a complete application form and may: (1) grant the accommodation request; (2) grant the accommodation request subject to specified nondiscriminatory conditions of approval; or (3) deny the request. All written determinations shall give notice of the right to appeal as specified in Section

9.29.090. The notice of determination shall be sent to the applicant by first class mail or in a format requested by the applicant.

C. For requests for a reasonable accommodation involving related applications for discretionary approval, the application shall be processed and considered separately from any discretionary elements of the same proposal. If the request for a reasonable accommodation cannot be effectuated until a final decision is rendered on the related discretionary approval(s), a "provisional decision" can be granted within the 30-day time frame and shall become final at the same time as the discretionary approval(s). The applications for the discretionary approval(s) shall be separately considered and shall be subject to the procedures specified in the applicable Zoning Code section. The appropriate decision-making body shall act on all discretionary permits, but not the reasonable accommodation request.

9.29.070 Findings for requests.

A. In making a determination to grant a requested accommodation, the City Planner shall make all of the following findings for requests:

1. That the housing, which is the subject of the request for reasonable accommodation, will be used by people with disabilities protected under fair housing laws.

2. That the accommodation is necessary to afford people with disabilities an equal opportunity to use and enjoy the dwelling;

3. That the requested accommodation will not require a fundamental alteration to zoning laws, rules, policies, practices and procedures; and

4. That the requested accommodation will not impose an undue financial or administrative burden on the City.

B. None of the findings of this Section are intended to supersede any other findings which might also be required for a discretionary permit that is reviewed concurrently with the request for accommodation.

9.29.080 Finality of decision.

A. For requests for reasonable accommodations not involving related land use permits, a decision by the City Planner shall become final ten (10) calendar days after the date of initial decision.
-5- Ord. No.386
B. For requests for reasonable accommodations involving related land use permits, a decision by the City Planner shall become final (10) calendar days after the date of decision on the related land use permit or the date of denial of the provisional permit, whichever is later.

C. In the event that the last date of appeal falls on a weekend, holiday or when City offices are closed, the next date such offices are open for business shall be the last date of appeal.

9.29.090 Appeal Procedure
A. Within ten (10) days of the date of the City Planner's written decision, an applicant may appeal an adverse decision. Appeals from the adverse decision shall be made in writing.

B. If an individual needs assistance in filing an appeal on an adverse decision, the City will provide assistance to ensure that the appeal process is accessible.

C. All appeals shall contain a statement of the grounds for the appeal. Any information identified by an applicant as confidential shall be retained in a manner so as to respect the privacy rights of the applicant and shall not be made available for public inspection.

D. Appeals shall be heard by the City Manager within thirty days of filing an appeal.

The City Manager shall issue a written decision within ten days of the hearing and the decision shall be final.

E. Nothing in this procedure shall preclude an aggrieved individual from seeking any other state or federal remedy available.

SECTION 3. CEQA. This Ordinance is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to the common sense exemption set forth in Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) that CEQA only applies to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment and where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity will have a significant effect, the activity is not subject to CEQA. This Ordinance enacts a procedure as required by federal and state law and does not change the density, intensity, or allowed uses or would have other effects on the environment. The changes are not for any specific project and therefore will not impact any environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern, will not create cumulative impacts, or impacts to scenic highways, hazardous waste sites, or historical resources. Because this is an ordinance pertaining to citywide development standards there will not be any significant effects on the environment due to unusual circumstances. As such, staff is directed to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15061(b)(3).

SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance is held to be unconstitutional, it is the intent of the City Council that such portion of this Ordinance be severable from the remainder and that the remainder be given full force and effect. -6- Ord. No.386
SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 17th day of October, 2023.

Richard G. Barakat
Mayor
ATTEST:

Diane Jensen
City Clerk
-7- Ord. No.386

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §.

CITY OF BRADBURY )
1, Diane Jensen, City Clerk of the City of Bradbury, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance, being Ordinance No. 386, was duly passed by the City Council of the City of Bradbury, signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 17th day of October, 2023, that it was duly posted and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

Diane Jensen
City Clerk
City of Bradbury
-8- Ord. No.386

INCORPORATED
Richard G. Barakat, Mayor (District 3)
Richard T. Hale, Jr. Mayor Pro Tem (District 1)
Elizabeth Bruny, Council Member (District 5)
BRADBURY Bruce Lathrop, Council Member (District 4)
Monte Lewis, Council Member (District 2)
City of Bradbury
Agenda Report
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Kevin Kearney, City Manager
DATE: October 17, 2023
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 387 - ADOPTION

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BRADBURY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CHAPTER 9.30 OF THE

BRADBURY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO DENSITY BONUS

LAWS AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE TO BE EXEMPT PURSUANT

TO THE COMMON SENSE EXEMPTION OF CEQA GUIDELINES
SECTION 15061(b)(3)
Attachment: Ordinance No. 387

SUMMARY
State law includes provisions known as the Density Bonus Law ("DBL") which provides incentives for developers to provide affordable housing. Local governments are required to adopt an ordinance regarding implementation of this law. As the City had no current DBL provisions and a conceptual plan review application had been received for a density bonus project, staff prepared both Urgency Ordinance No. 385U that was adopted at the September 19, 2023, regular meeting and which took effect immediately, and the regular Ordinance No. 387 that was introduced after the public hearing at the September 19, 2023, regular meeting. It is recommended that the City Council waive the reading in full, authorize the reading by title only, and adopt Ordinance No. 387.

BACKGROUND
Government Code sections 65915 through 65918 provide for density bonuses and other incentives and waivers of development standards when a developer builds a housing project and provides a minimum percentage of affordable housing. The DBL also sets the maximum amount of parking that can be required for a project.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 2E
Ordinance No. 387 - Adoption Density Bonus
October 17, 2023 Page 2 of 2
An incentive or waiver is basically a reduction in site development standards, zoning code requirements, or architectural design requirements that are in excess of the minimum building standards and that result in identifiable and actual cost reductions.

Incentives and waivers cannot reduce Building Codes and Health and Safety standards.

A city is required to grant a requested incentive or waiver unless it makes specified findings based on substantial evidence. There is no limit to the number of waivers a developer may be request. The density and incentives are based upon the amount of affordable housing that is provided.

Since the DBL was first adopted by the State in 1982, it has been amended more than 20 times. These frequent amendments make it difficult for a city to maintain a legally compliant local ordinance. Accordingly, Ordinance No. 387 has been drafted to incorporate the DBL by reference as it may be amended from time to time, so the City can adopt implementing regulations and not reiterate a very lengthy law, and not amend the City code each time the State amends the DBL.

The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their August 23, 2023, regular meeting, and adopted Resolution No. PC 23-312, to recommend that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 387.

The City Council held a public hearing at the September 19, 2023, regular meeting and introduced Ordinance No. 387.

There will be no financial cost to the City as the Ordinance implements what the City is already required to do by State law.

CEQA
There is a common sense exemption to CEQA where it can be seen with certainty that the project will not have a signiticant ettect on the environment. As the Ordinance gives no greater development rights than what is provided for under State law, it will not create any significant effects on the environment and a notice of exemption should be filed under CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b) (3).

RECOMMENDATION AND CITY COUNCIL ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council waive the reading in full, authorize the reading by title only, and adopt Ordinance No. 387:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BRADBURY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CHAPTER 9.30 OF THE

BRADBURY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO DENSITY BONUS

LAWS AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE TO BE EXEMPT PURSUANT

TO THE COMMON SENSE EXEMPTION OF CEQA GUIDELINES
SECTION 15061(b)(3)
Attachment
Ordinance No. 387

ATTACHMENT
ORDINANCE NO. 387

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
ally Or BRaDBURY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING
CHAPTER 9.30 OF THE BRADBURY MUNICIPAL

CODE RELATING TO DENSITY BONUS LAWS AND

FINDING THE ORDINANCE TO BE EXEMPT

PURSUANT TO THE COMMON SENSE EXEMPTION
OF CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(b)(3)
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2E
ORDINANCE NO. 387

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRADBURY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CHAPTER 9.30 OF THE BRADBURY MUNICIPAL

CODE RELATING TO DENSITY BONUS LAWS AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE

TO BE EXEMPT PURSUANT TO THE COMMON SENSE EXEMPTION OF CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(b)(3)
WHEREAS, the City is in the process of adopting its 6th Cycle Housing Element for the 2021-2029 period; and
WHEREAS, although the Housing Element has not yet been adopted, the City has received comments from the Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD") on the drafts that have been presented; and
WHEREAS, one of HCD's comments on the City's 6h Cycle Housing Element related to the need for the City to adopt an ordinance to implement the State Density Bonus Law ("DBL"); and
WHEREAS, given the complexity of the DBL and the frequency with which it is amended, the City desires to adopt the law by reference with local implementation procedures; and
WHEREAS, on August 23, 2023 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on proposed Ordinance No. 387 at which time it considered all evidence presented, both written and oral; and
WHEREAS, after the close of the public hearing the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC 23-312 recommending that the City Council adopt the proposed Ordinance No. 387; and
WHEREAS, on [DATE], the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on proposed Ordinance No. 387 at which time it considered all evidence presented, both written and oral;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRADBURY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 30 is hereby added to the Bradbury Development Code (Title IX of the Bradbury Municipal Code) to read as follows:

CHAPTER 30. - DENSITY BONUS
Sec. 9.30.010. - Purpose.

The purpose of this Chapter is to implement the requirements of the Density Bonus Law set forth at Government Code section 65915 et seq.

Sec. 9.30.020. - Adoption by reference.

The state Density Bonus Law, set forth at Chapter 4.3 of the Planning and Zoning, a of aliena be and ate or time to de is here a piled bye reference as the City of Bradbury's Density Bonus provisions and shall be implemented in accordance with this Chapter.

Sec. 9.30.030. - Applicability.

This Chapter shall apply to any housing development that is entitled to receive a density bonus pursuant to the state Density Bonus Law.

Sec. 9.30.040. - Procedures.
(a) Application submittal. An application for a density bonus, including an incentive or concession and waiver, shall be filed concurrently with an application for a housing development and shall be processed concurrently. (b) Application contents. An application for a density bonus shall include the following information:
(1) The number of density bonus units being requested;
2) A reduced parking ratio request pursuant to Government Code section 65915(p);
(3) An incentive(s) or concession(s) request pursuant to Government Code section 65915(d) that results in identifiable and actual cost reductions to provide for the affordable housing;
(4) A waivers) or reductions of development standard(s) request pursuant to Government Code section 65915(e) that would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of the housing development at the densities or with the allowed incentive(s) or concession(s).
(c) If an application for a density bonus is incomplete, the applicant shall be timely notified of such incompleteness in accordance with the provisions of applicable law.

If a proposed housing development would be inconsistent with the City's Development Code or the state Density Bonus Law, the applicant shall be provided notice of such inconsistency in accordance with the Housing Accountability Act, Government Code section 65589.5.
(e) A density bonus application shall be approved or denied in conjunction with the housing development application by the body approving such application within the time frames required for approval of such development. -2- Ord. No. 387
Sec. 9.30.050. - Requirements.
(a) The applicant for a density bonus shall enter into a regulatory agreement with the City in a form to be approved by the City Attorney and said agreement shall be recorded against the property. The regulatory agreement shall be approved by the approval authority on the underlying project. If an appeal is taken of the project, then the regulatory agreement shall be approved by the decision maker on appeal.

The applicant shall be required to pay the City's costs for any third-party consultants required to assist the City in drafting a regulatory agreement, developing guidelines, verifying the eligibility of owners or tenants of the affordable units, or any other matter relating to the density bonus. (c) The required affordable dwelling units shall be constructed concurrently with market-rate units unless both the final decision-making authority of the City and the developer agree within the affordable housing agreement to an alternative schedule for development.
(d) The exterior design and construction of the affordable dwelling units shall be consistent with the exterior design and construction of the total project development and shall be consistent with any affordable residential development standards that may be prepared by the City.
(1) The affordable units shall be similar in size and number of bedrooms to the market-rate units. If the development project includes a range of unit sizes, then the affordable units shall provide a range of unit sizes in proportion to the market-rate units.
(2) If the project includes a subdivision, the lots with affordable units shall be of similar size to the lots with market rate units. If the development project includes a range of lot sizes, the lots with affordable units shall be no smaller than the smallest lots with market-rate units.
(e) The affordable units shall have the same amenities as the market rate units, including the same access to and enjoyment of common open space, parking, storage, and other facilities in the residential development, provided at an affordable rent or at affordable ownership cost specified by Health and Safety Code section 50052.5 and California Code of Regulations Title 25, Section 6910 - 6924, as the same may be amended from time to time. Developers are strictly prohibited from discriminating against tenants or owners of affordable units in granting access to and full enjoyment of any community amenities available to other tenants or owners outside of their individual units. (f) If the development project is for units that will be sold, then the affordable dwelling units shall also be for sale units. The regulatory agreement may make provisions for rental of the units for the same level of affordability that qualified the -3- Ord. No. 387
applicant for the density bonus if the unit is not sold within a period of time specified in the agreement.

SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on the thirty-first day after passage.

SECTION 3. CEQA. This Ordinance is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to the common sense exemption set forth in Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) that CEQA only applies to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment and where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity will have a significant effect, the activity is not subject to CEQA. This Ordinance enacts a procedure as required by state law and does not change the density, intensity, or allowed uses or would have other effects on the environment. The changes are not tor any specific project and therefore will not impact any environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern, will not create cumulative impacts, or impacts to scenic highways, hazardous waste sites, or historical resources. This Ordinance simply implements state law. As such, staff is directed to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15061(b)(3).

SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 17th day of October, 2023.

Richard G. Barakat
Mayor
ATTEST:

Diane Jensen
City Clerk
-4- Ord. No. 387

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §.

CITY OF BRADBURY )
1, Diane Jensen, City Clerk of the City of Bradbury, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance, being Ordinance No. 387, was duly passed by the City Council of he City of Bradbury, signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested by the City Clerk, al at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 17th day of October, 2023, that it was duly posted and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

Diane Jensen
City Clerk
City of Bradbury
-5- Ord. No. 387

NURCORALL
JULY 26. 1957
Richard G. Barakat, Mayor (District 3)
INLY ONL Richard T. Hale, Jr. Mayor Pro Tem (District 1) Elizabeth Bruny, Council Member (District 5)
BRADBURY Bruce Lathrop, Council Member (District 4)
Monte Lewis, Council Member (District 2)
City of Bradbury
Agenda Report
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Kevin Kearney, City Manager
DATE: September 19, 2023
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 388 - ADOPTION

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

BRADBURY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE BRADBURY MUNICIPAL

CODE RELATING TO SECONDARY LIVING QUARTERS AND FINDING

THE ORDINANCE TO BE EXEMPT PURSUANT TO THE COMMON
SENSE EXEMPTION OF CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(b)(3), CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15282(h), AND GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 65852.21
Attachment: Ordinance No. 388

SUMMARY
In July 2022 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 383 relating to secondary living quarters and SB 9 units. Since then, the State legislature has again amended the laws relating to accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs) and based on information issued by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), there is a need to revise the interplay between SB 9 units and ADUs. Ordinance No. 388 makes these changes. The City Council held a public hearing at the September 19, 2023, regular meeting and introduced Ordinance No. 388. It is recommended that the City Council waive the reading in full, authorize the reading by title only, and adopt Ordinance No. 388.

BACKGROUND
Several State statutes have amended the ADU and JADU, provisions. Ordinance No. 388 amends the City's ADU and JADU provisions to be consistent with the State amendments. Initially for SB 9, two units were allowed on a lot, including ADUs and AGENDA ITEM NO. 2F
Ordinance No. 388 - Adoption Chapter 85 - Secondary Living Quarters and SB 9 Units October 17, 2023 Page 2 of 2
JADUs. The Ordinance amends this to allow four units on an original lot or two units on each lot after a lot split in accordance with the clarifications issued by HCD.

The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their August 23, 2023, regular meeting and adopted Resolution No. PC 23-313, to recommend that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 388.

The City Council held a public hearing at the September 19, 2023, regular meeting and introduced Ordinance No. 388.

There will be no additional financial cost to the City as the amendments implement what the City is already required to do by State law.

CEQA
This Ordinance is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15282(h) which provides a statutory exemption for the adoption of an ordinance regarding accessory dwelling units to implement the provisions of Sections 65852.1 and 65852.2 of the Government Code. As the standards of Government Code Section 65852.22 relating to junior accessory dwelling units are incorporated into Government Code 65852.2, this exemption covers junior accessory dwelling units as well. Regardless of whether the City adopts this Ordinance, accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units must be allowed in the City in accordance with the standards set forth in State Statute. Additionally, the provisions of SB 9 exempted an ordinance which implemented SB 9 from CEQA. Therefore, this Ordinance is categorically exempt under the provisions of state law as well as the common sense exemption of CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) which provides that CEQA does not apply where it can be seen with certainty that the project will not cause any impacts.

RECOMMENDATION AND CITY COUNCIL ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council waive the reading in full, authorize the reading by title only, and adopt Ordinance No. 388:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

BRADBURY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE BRADBURY MUNICIPAL

CODE RELATING TO SECONDARY LIVING QUARTERS AND FINDING

ATTACHMENT
ORDINANCE NO. 388

BRADBURY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO

SECONDARY LIVING QUARTERS AND FINDING THE

ORDINANCE TO BE EXEMPT PURSUANT TO THE

COMMON SENSE EXEMPTION OF CEQA GUIDELINES
SECTION 15061(b)(3)
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2F
ORDINANCE NO. 388

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

BRADBURY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE BRADBURY

MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO SECONDARY LIVING

QUARTERS AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE TO BE EXEMPT

PURSUANT TO THE COMMON SENSE EXEMPTION OF CEQA
GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(b)(3), CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15282(h), AND GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65852.21
WHEREAS, in a continued effort to provide affordable housing the State Legislature has continued to make amendments to state law relating to accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units; and WHEREAS, since the time that the City adopted Ordinance No. 383 in July 2022 implementing SB 9, clarifications have been made as to the interpretation of the law;
WHEREAS, the City desires to update the Development Code to comply with these laws and clarifications; and
WHEREAS, on August 23, 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Bradbury, California, held a duly noticed public hearing on this proposed Ordinance and after the close of the public hearing the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC 23-313 recommending that the City Council adopt this Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, on September 19, 2023, the City Council of the City of Bradbury, California held a duly noticed public hearing to consider adoption of this Ordinance, at which time it considered all evidence presented, both written and oral;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRADBURY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council hereby makes the following findings regarding the prohibition of accessory dwelling units in certain locations within the City of Bradbury:

A. The majority of the City of Bradbury is located in a very high fire hazard severity zone (VHFHSZ);
Since 1953 there have been four separate wildfires that have burned through Bradbury and the neighboring communities;
C. The 2019 mid-term Housing Element recognized that opportunities for second unit in-fill development could be impacted by natural hazards such as wildfires that constrain density;
D. According to the Los Angeles County Fire Code which has been adopted by reference by the City of Bradbury, and as pointed out in the Dudek Memorandum, the minimum road width needed for fire access is 20-feet unobstructed paved width based on the standard width of fire engines and their ability to pass one another; E. The Dudek Memorandum also concludes among other things that the four- foot setback requirements and the inability to require fire sprinklers would likely have negative fire related impacts in Bradbury and recommends that fire sprinklers should be required whenever possible;
F. There are numerous roads within the City that are less than 20 feet in width which impedes access of fire apparatus;
G. Residents living on narrow roads within the City of Bradbury have been informed by the Los Angeles County Fire Department that if there is a fire, the Department may not be able to provide service;
H. Government Code § 51182 and Public Resources Code § 4291 provide that when property is within a very high fire hazard severity zone, there should be 100 feet of defensible space maintained for each side and from the front and rear of the structure, but not beyond the property line;
The majority of the City of Bradbury is zoned R-20,000, A-1, A-2, or A-5 with rear and side yard setbacks of 15 feet in the R-20,000 zone and 25 feet in the three Agricultural ("A*) zones, meaning that accessory living quarters and other structures cannot be located closer than 30 feet to each other in these areas; J. According to the Southern California Association of Governments' (SCAG) community profile, only 4.5% of the housing stock in Bradbury was built after 2010, when residential sprinkler systems became a requirement;
K. Since the time that the Governor signed the new ADU/JADU legislation into law in 2019, there have been dozens of wildfires in California which have burned tens of thousands of acres, damaged or destroyed hundreds of homes and other structures, caused the death of many people, and resulted in injuries to many more; L. On August 18, 2020, the international City/County Management Association released a document titled "21st Century - Fire and Emergency Services" which contained the recommendation to "Embrace the use of fire sprinkler technology in alla goings then in the to pid adily or dudes an in ordince of at thy ade asta fres On August 18, 2020, ABC News reported that there were at least 28 wildfires burning in California alone;
N. By August 19, 2020, the Governor declared a State of Emergency as more than 350 wildfires burned throughout California, many due to lightning strikes, and a request was made for 375 fire engines from out-of-state; In 2021 California faced unprecedented fire conditions according to Cal Fire. By the end of 2021, there had been over 8,800 fires which destroyed or damaged -2- Ord. No. 388
at least 3,600 structures. In 2022, there were more than an additional 7,600 fires with nine deaths and as of July 2023, there have already been over 3,000 wildfires; P. In August 2022 the City, the Los Angeles County Fire Department, and the U.S. Forest Service signed off on a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) which was incorporated into the City's Hazard Mitigation Plan. The CWPP contains the following information:

1. Not counting fires under 10 acres; 93 fires have burned within five miles of the City since the beginning of data recording and two of the fires have been within the northern portion of the City;

2. It is estimated there will be a wildland fire within five miles of the City on average of every 1.25 years;

3. Challenges with development in wildfire urban interface areas inciude narrow roads, long driveways, dead-end roads, steep slopes, and dense vegetation, which can hinder emergency response and evacuation from these areas. All of these factors are present in the City;
4 Bradbury presents unique challenges for evacuation due to the speed and intensity at which wildfires occur as well as the high variability in transportation systems in the City;

5. The majority of the structures in the City were developed before the adoption of building and fire codes that required noncombustible roofing and building materials, adequate fire department access, and which meet water supply standards which puts these structures at greater risk and limits the ability to provide adequate structure protections;

6. There are two primary concerns for structure ignition: burning embers and radiant/convective heat. In older communities where structures do not include ignition resistant improvements, radiant heat from burning vegetation and adjacent structures is a primary concern. Areas with buildings closer together are at greater risk of burning due to radiant heat. Proximity of structures also limits the ability to maintain 30 feet of defensible space which inhibits firefighters from being able to safely maneuver around structures to provide protection.

Q. State of Emergencies have become a yearly occurrence due to wildfires; R. Because the accessory dwelling unit law does not allow the City to require sprinklers in units where the main house was not required to install sprinklers, the City cannot require sprinklers to be installed in most of the accessory dwelling units that could be built in the City. However, state law allows the City to designate areas within the jurisdiction where accessory dwelling units may be permitted based on the impacts on traffic flow and public safety;
S. As evidenced above, the location of the City in a very high fire hazard severity zone, the inability to require sufficient separation between buildings, the inability -3- Ord. No. 388
to require sprinklers in a majority of accessory dwelling units that could be built, and the narrow streets which impede fire personnel access and evacuation justify the prohibition of accessory dwelling units to be built as of right in those areas of the City in the very high fire hazard severity zone;
T. The City Council recognizes the need for additional housing opportunities in the City, even in the very high fire hazard severity zone, and for that reason is providing for the opportunity for certain accessory dwelling units of up to 1,000 square feet as defined herein to be built in this area with reduced procedural requirements, while still imposing setbacks for adequate building separation and requiring fire sprinklers; U. The City Council also recognizes that Bradbury has traditionally allowed the development of a variety of accessory living quarters and wishes to continue to allow such development, subject to review by the City's Planning Department, and the City's Planning Commission;
V. The provisions set forth in this Ordinance are necessary for the public safety.

SECTION 2. Subsections 9.85.020(a) and (b) of the Bradbury Municipal Code are amended to read as follows; all other subsections remain the same:

Sec. 9.85.020. - Permitted locations/numbers.
(a) Main houses, Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), Enhanced ADUs (EADUs), Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs), and SB 9 units shall be allowed in the areas of the City which are not in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone as provided for below:

Single Lot SB 9-Legacy Lot New SB 9 Lot
R-7,500 Main house (1,500 sf Main house (1,500 sf min) 2 SB 9 units per lot - min) - and - limited to 800 sf each
- and - ADU or SB 9 unit (1,000
ADU (1,000 st) ' st 1
-and- - and -
SB 9 unit (1,000 sf) 1 JADU (500 sf)
- and -
JADU (500 sf)
R-20,000 Main house (1,850 sf Main house (1,850 sf min) 2 SB 9 units per lot - min) - and - limited to 800 sf each
- and - ADU or SB 9 unit (1,000
ADU (1,000 st) ' or St 1
EADU (1,200 sf) - or -
-and- EADU (1,200 st)
SB 9 unit (1,000 st) ' - and -
-and- JADU (500 sf)
JADU (500 sf)
-4- Ord. No. 388
A-1 Main house (2,250 sf Main house (2,250 sf min) 2 SB 9 units per lot - min) - and - limited to 800 sf each
ADU or SB 9 unit (1,000
ADU (1,000 st) '
- and - - and -
SB 9 unit (1,000 sf) 1 JADU (500 st)
-and-
JADU (500 st)
A-2 Main house (2,500 sf Main house (2,500 sf min) 2 SB 9 units per lot - min) - and - limited to 800 sf each
ADU or SB 9 unit (1,000
ADU (1,000 st) 1
- and -
- 9 unit (1,000 7) 1 JADU (500 sf)
-and-
JADU (500 st)
A-5 Main house (2,500 sf Main house (2,500 sf min) 2 SB 9 units per lot - min) - and - limited to 800 sf each
- and - ADU or SB 9 unit (1,000
ADU (1,000 st) 1 st) '
- and - - and -
SB 9 unit (1,000 st) 1 JADU (500 sf)
-and-
JADU (500 st)
1 Where there is a JADU and a detached ADU or SB 9 unit, the ADU or SB 9 unit shall be limited to 800 square feet in size.
(b) Main houses, Fire Zone ADUs (FZADUs), JADUs, and SB 9 units shall be allowed in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone as provided for below:

Single Lot SB 9—Legacy Lot New SB 9 Lot
R-7,500 Main house (1,500 sf min) Main house (1,500 sf min) 2 SB 9 units per - and - - and - lot - limited to
FZADU (1,000 st) ' FZADU or SB 9 unit 800 sf each
- and - (1,000 st) '
SB 9 Unit (1,000 sf) 1 - and -
JADU (500 sf)
JADU (500 st)
R-20,000 Main house (1,850 sf min) Main house (1,850 sf min) 2 SB 9 units per - and - - and - lot - limited to
FZADU (1,000 st) 'or FZADU or SB 9 unit 800 sf each
EADU (1,200 sf) (1,000 sf) '
- and or EADU (1,200 st)
SB 9 unit (1,000 sf) ' - and -
-and- JADU (500 si)
JADU (500 sf)
-5- Ord. No. 388
A -1 Main house (2,250 sf min) Main house (2,250 sf min) | 2 SB 9 units per - and - - and - lot - limited to
FZADU (1,000 st) ' FZADU or SB 9 unit 800 sf each
- and - (1,000 st) 1
SB 9 unit (1,000 sf) - and -
-and- JADU (500 sf)
JADU (500 sf)
A-2 Main house (2,500 sf min) Main house (2,500 sf min) 2 SB 9 units per - and - - and - lot - limited to
FZADU (1,000 st) ' FZADU or SB 9 unit 800 sf each
- and- (1,000 st) '
SB 9 unit (1,000 sf) 1 - and -
-and- JADU (500 sf)
JADU (500 st)
A-5 Main house (2,500 sf min) Main house (2,500 sf min) 2 SB 9 units per - and - - and - lot - limited to
FZADU (1,000 st) 1 FZADU or SB 9 unit 800 sf each
- and - (1,000 st) 1
SB 9 unit (1,000 st) ' - and -
-and- JADU (500 st)
JADU (500 st)
1 Where there is a JADU and a detached FZADU or SB 9 unit, the ADU or SB 9 unit shall be limited to 800 square feet in size.

SECTION 3. Articles II and III of Chapter 85 of the Bradbury Development Code are hereby amended to read as follows:

ARTICLE II. - ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY

DWELLING UNITS
Sec. 9.85.100. - Purpose.

The purpose of this article is to implement the requirements for the establishment of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units as required by California Government Code §§ 65852.2, 65852.22, and 65852.23.

Sec. 9.85.110. - Applications.
(a) Applications for accessory dwelling units (ADUs), fire zone accessory dwelling units (FZADUs) and junior accessory dwelling units (JADUs) shall be ministerially approved or denied within 60 days of receipt of a complete application and shall be approved if they meet the requirements of this chapter. Applications for Enhanced accessory dwelling units (EADUs) shall not be subject to this 60-day requirement.

If the application is submitted in conjunction with an application for a new primary single-family unit, the application for the ADU, FZADU or JADU shall not be acted upon until the application for the new primary single-family unit is -6- Ord. No. 388
approved, but thereafter shall be ministerially approved if it meets all requirements within 60 days.
(2) The city shall grant a delay if requested by the applicant. (b) All applications for ADUs, FZADUs, EADUs, and/or JADUs shall be accompanied by the applicable application fee.
(c) ADUs, FZADUs, EADUs and JADUs shall be subject to applicable inspections and permit fees.
(d) Applications for EADUs shall be processed in accordance with Article Ill of this chapter and subject to the rules and regulations set forth therein. (e) If an application for a detached ADU or FZADU requires demolition of a detached garage, the application shall be submitted with the demolition application and the two applications shall be reviewed at the same time. If the ADU or FZADU is approved, the permits shall be issued at the same time.

Sec. 9.85.115. - Denial.
(a) If the City denies an application for an ADU, FZADU, or JADU, the City shall return a full set of comments to the applicant with a list of items that are defective or deficient and a description of how the application can be remedied. The comments must be in writing and returned to the applicant within 60 days of receipt of a complete application.
(b) No application shall be denied due to the need to correct a nonconforming zoning condition, building code violation, or due to unpermitted structures, unless those conditions present a threat to the public health and safety and are affected by the construction of the ADU, FZADU, or JADU.
(c) No application shall be denied for an ADU that was constructed prior to January 1, 2018, based on either of the following, unless the City makes a finding that correcting the violation is necessary to protect the health and safety of the public or of the occupants of the structure:
(1) The ADU is in violation of building standards pursuant to Article 1 of Chapter 5 of part 1.5 of Division 13 of the Health and Safety Code; or (2) The ADU does not comply with section 65852.2 or any local ordinance regulating ADUs.

This subsection shall not apply to a building that is deemed substandard pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 17920.3.

Sec. 9.85.120. - Allowed zones/density.
(a) An ADU may be constructed in any zone on a lot which contains a legally existing -7- Ord. No. 388
or proposed primary single-family dwelling unit, provided that no ADUs shall be allowed in the very high fire hazard severity zone. However, a FZADU and EADU may be built in the very high fire hazard severity zone in compliance with Article III of this chapter.
(b) ADUs of any type shall not count in determining density or lot coverage and are considered a residential use consistent with the existing general plan and zoning designation for the lot.

Sec. 9.85.130. - Accessory dwelling units (ADUs) - Development standards/ requirements.

For purposes of this section, the term "ADU" shall include a "FZADU". (a) Type of building. An attached or detached ADU shall be a permanent structure on a permanent foundation with permanent provisions for living, sleeping, food preparation, sanitation, and bathing. A manufactured home as defined in the California Health and Safety Code § 18007 shall qualify. (b) Height. The height of an ADU shall as follows:
(1) A height of 18 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit; (2) A height of 18 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit that is within ½ mile walking distance of a major transit stop or a high-quality transit corridor. An additional 2 feet shall be allowed if required to accommodate a roof pitch on the accessory dwelling unit that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit.
(3) A height of 18 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily, multistory dwelling.
(4) A height of 25 feet or the height limit of the applicable zone that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower, for an accessory dwelling unit that is attached to a primary dwelling unit or built above an existing garage. In no event shall the accessory dwelling unit exceed 2 stories;
(5) An ADU converted from previously existing permitted space which already exists above the permitted ground floor area or garage - to the height already existing if greater than the height set forth in subsections (b)(1) - (4), above. (c) Size.
(1) Maximum size - the square footage of an ADU shall not exceed that set forth in Section 9.85.020.
(2) Minimum size - the square footage of an ADU shall not be less than 150 square feet. -8- Ord. No. 388
(d) Application of underlying development standards.
(1) The objective development standards of the underlying zone shall apply, except as may be specified herein.
(2) If application of any development standard of the underlying zone or this chapter prevents the construction of an ADU that meets the height requirements specified in subsection (b), such development standard shall be waived to the extent needed to allow an 800 square foot ADU. The waiver of standards does not apply to the requirement for minimum four-foot side and rear yard setbacks. (e) Setbacks.
(1) Attached and detached ADUs shall be located behind the front yard setback line of the primary unit. This requirement shall be waived if necessary to permit an 800 square foot ADU with four-foot side and rear yard setbacks in compliance with all other development standards.
(2) The maximum side and rear yard setback requirements for an ADU, including an ADU added in an already existing and permitted space above a garage or other floor area shall be four feet. This does not prevent the applicant from providing a larger setback. For hillside lots with an average slope of at least ten percent, the four-foot setbacks shall be measured from the edge of the building pad and the edge of any top or toe of a slope.
(3) The setback requirements in subsections (5)a. and b. and above shall not apply if the ADU is being converted from a legally existing accessory structure, including a garage, or is being constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as a legally existing accessory structure, including a garage. (4) ADUs shall be required to comply with the requirements of the Building Code as set forth in Title XVII of the Bradbury Municipal Code. (f) Parking.
(1) Parking shall be required at the rate of one space for each ADU. (2) Parking spaces for an ADU may be provided through tandem parking on a legally existing driveway; provided, that such parking does not encroach into the public right-of-way or a private street.

Parking spaces for ADUs may be provided in the paved portions of setback areas; provided, that the amount of paving does not exceed the total amount of paving and hardscaped areas that are otherwise allowed by this title at the time the ADU is approved.
(4) When a garage, carport, or covered parking structure is converted into an ADU, or is demolished to accommodate the construction of an ADU, such parking spaces need not be replaced.
-9- Ord. No. 388
Tandem parking and parking in setback areas shall not be allowed if the City Manager makes specific findings that such parking is not feasible based upon specific site or regional topographical, or fire and life safety conditions. (6)
a. The ADU is located within one-half mile walking distance of a public transit stop;
b. The ADU is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district;
C. The ADU is part of a legally existing primary unit or a legally existing accessory structure;
d. When on-street parking permits are required, but not offered to the occupant of the ADU; or
e. When there is a car share vehicle located within one block of the ADU; or f. When a permit application for an accessory dwelling unit is submitted with a permit application to create a new single- or multi-family dwelling on the same lot, provided the ADU or parcel satisfies any other criteria listed in this paragraph.
(g) Design.
(1) The ADU shall be the exact same color as the primary unit. (2) The ADU shall have the exact same roof pitch as the primary unit. (3) The ADU shall have a separate entrance from the primary unit. (h) Utilities - Connections, fees, and capacity charges. (1) For an ADU contained within a legally existing primary unit, or a legally existing accessory structure meeting the requirements of Section 9.85.140(a) (1) below, the City shall not require the installation of a new or separate utility connection between the ADU and the utility or impose a connection fee or capacity charge. Such requirement and charges may be imposed when the ADU is being constructed in conjunction with a proposed new primary unit. (2) For all ADUs other than those described in subsection (h)(1) above, the City shall require a new or separate utility connection between the ADU and the utility and shall charge a connection fee or capacity charge that is proportionate to the burden of the proposed ADU based on the size or number of drainage fixture unit (DFU) values upon the water or sewer system.
-10- Ord. No. 388
(i) Impact fees.
(1) No impact fee shall be imposed on any ADU of up to 750 square feet in size.

Notwithstanding any fee resolution to the contrary, for ADUs larger than 750 square feet, impact fees shall be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary unit.
(3) All applicable public service and recreation impact fees shall be paid prior to occupancy in accordance with California Government Code §§ 66000 et seq. and 66012 et seq.

For purposes of this section, "impact fee" shall have the meaning set forth in California Government Code § 65852.2(f).

Sec. 9.85.135. - Fire Sprinklers
(a) Fire sprinklers shall be required in the ADU if they were/are required in the primary unit at the time of construction.
(b) Fire sprinklers shall be required in a FZADU regardless of whether they were required in the primary unit.
(c) The construction of an ADU or FZADU shall not trigger a requirement for sprinklers to be installed in the primary unit.

Sec. 9.85.140. - Mandatory approvals.
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the City shall ministerially approve an application for any one of the following categories of ADUs and/or JADUs within a residential zone, unless such ADU is in the very high fire hazard severity zone.
(1) An ADU and a JADU within the existing or proposed space of the primary unit or accessory structure, subject to the following requirements:
a. An ADU or JADU shall have exterior access separate from the legally existing or proposed primary unit.

An expansion of up to 150 square feet shall be allowed for a legally existing accessory structure that is to be converted to an ADU, solely for the purpose of accommodating separate ingress and egress.

C. The side and rear yard setbacks shall be sufficient for fire and safety. d. The JADU shall comply with the requirements of Sections 9.85.150 and 9.85.160 below.
-11- Ord. No. 388
(2) One detached ADU that will have at least four-foot side and rear yard setbacks on a legally existing lot with a legally existing or proposed primary unit, provided that the ADU shall not be more than 800 square feet and shall not exceed the height requirements set forth in Section 9.85.130(b). The ADU may be combined with a JADU so long as it complies with all the requirements of Sections 9.85.150 and 9.85.160 below.
(3) On a lot with a legally existing multifamily dwelling structure, up to 25 percent of the total multifamily dwelling units, but no less than one ADU or JADU, shall be allowed within the portions of the legally existing structure that are not used as livable space, including, but not limited to, storage rooms, boiler rooms, passageways, attics, basements, or garages, provided that each dwelling unit complies with State building standards for dwellings.
(4) On a lot with a legally existing or proposed multifamily dwelling structure, there may be up to two detached ADUs, provided that neither unit exceeds the height requirements set forth in Section 9.85.130(b) and that both ADUs have at least four-foot side and rear yard setbacks. For those ADUs and JADUs that require mandatory approval, the City shall not require the correction of legal, nonconforming zoning conditions.
(b) Any ADU created under this Section 9.85.140 shall not be rented for a period of less than 30 days.

Sec. 9.85.150. - Junior accessory dwelling units - development standards/ requirements.
(a) One JADU shall be allowed on single-family residentially zoned lots in conjunction with a legally existing or proposed primary single-family unit, including in an attached garage. A JADU may be allowed on the same lot as a detached ADU propose a pied on in sail where the detached ADU is no larger than 800 square feet and does not exceed the height requirements set forth in Section 9.85.130(b). (b) The JADU shall be required to contain at least an efficiency kitchen which includes cooking appliances and a food preparation counter and storage cabinets that are of reasonable size in relation to the size of the JADU. (c) The JADU shall be required to have a separate entrance from the primary unit. (d) The JADU may, but is not required to, include separate sanitation facilities. If separate sanitation facilities are not provided, the JADU shall share sanitation facilities with the primary single-family unit and shall have direct access to the primary unit from the interior of the JADU.
(e) Parking.
(1) No additional parking shall be required for a JADU. (2) If a garage is converted to develop a JADU, replacement parking shall be required. -12- Ord. No. 388
(f) A JADU shall be required to comply with applicable Building Code standards. (g) The owner of the property on which a JADU is constructed shall record with the County Recorder of Los Angeles County, a deed restriction which shall run with the land and a copy of the recorded deed restriction shail be filed with the City after recordation. The deed restriction shall provide for the following:
(1) A prohibition on the sale of the JADU separate from the sale of the primary unit; (2) A prohibition on the JADU being larger than 500 square feet; (3) A prohibition on renting either the primary unit or the junior accessory dwelling unit for less than 30 consecutive, calendar days; (4) A restriction that the owner resides in either the primary unit or the JADU, notwithstanding the following:

The owner may rent both the primary unit and the JADU to one party with a restriction in the lease that such party may not further sublease any unit or portion thereof; and
b. This restriction shall not apply if the owner of the primary single-family unit is a governmental agency, land trust, or housing organization; and C. A statement that the deed restrictions may be enforced against future purchasers.
(h) For the purposes of applying any fire or life protection ordinance or regulation, or providing service water, sewer, or power, including a connection fee, a JADU shall not be considered a separate or new dwelling unit.

The City shall not require the correction of legal, nonconforming zoning conditions for approval of a JADU.

Sec. 9.85.160. - Regulations - accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and junior accessory dwelling units (JADUs).

All provisions set forth herein relating to ADUs shall also apply to FZADUs and EADUs. (a) Sales. ADUs and JADUs cannot be sold separately from the primary unit, except to the extent the sale meets the requirements of Government Code section 65852.26 with regard to a qualified nonprofit corporation. (b) Rental.
(1) Short-term rentals of the ADU and JADU are prohibited. (2) The ADU or JADU may be rented separate from the primary unit. -13- Ord. No. 388
(C) Owner/occupancy.

No ADU approved between January 1, 2020, and January 1, 2025, shall have an owner-occupancy requirement. After January 1, 2025, owner-occupancy shall be required for all new ADUs, such that the owner of the property shall occupy either the ADU or the primary unit.
(2) All properties on which a JADU is developed shall have an owner- occupancy requirement in accordance with Section 9.85. 150(g). (d) This chapter shall in no way validate any existing illegal ADU nor shall it change a legal nonconforming unit to a conforming unit.
(e) An application to convert an illegal and/or nonconforming ADU and/or JADU to a legal conforming ADU or JADU shall be subject to the same standards and requirements as for a newly proposed unit.
(f) Subsections (d) and (e) above shall not apply to any unpermitted accessory dwelling unit which is subject to Government Code section 65852.23 unless the city makes a finding that correcting the violation is necessary to protect the health and safety of the public or occupants of the structure. (g) Guest houses that were previously approved and which have a valid building permit on file shall not be affected by this chapter. However, an application to convert a guest house to an ADU shall be subject to this chapter. (h) Enforcement. Until January 1, 2030, the City shall issue a statement along with a notice to correct a violation of any provision of any Building Code standard relating to an ADU or JADU that provides substantially as follows:

You have been issued an order to correct violations or abate nuisances relating to your accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit. If you believe that this correction or abatement is not necessary to protect the public health and safety you may file an application with the City Manager. If the City determines that enforcement is not required to protect the health and safety, enforcement shall be delayed for a period of five years from the date of the original notice.

This provision shall only apply to ADUs and JADUs built before January 1, 2020.

ARTICLE III. - ALTERNATE TYPES OF ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS Sec. 9.85.200. - Fire zone accessory dwelling units.

FZADUs shall be processed in accordance with and subject to the provisions of Sections 9.85.110 through 9.85.130, and 9.85.160 above with the following exceptions:
(a) FZADUs shall be required to have minimum side and rear yard setbacks of 15 feet that shall be maintained in compliance with the Fire Department's fuel modification requirements. For hillside lots with an average slope of at least ten percent, the -14- Ord. No. 388
15-foot setbacks shall be measured from the edge of the building pad and the edge of any top or toe of a slope; and
(b) FZADUs shall be required to be equipped with fire sprinklers.

Sec. 9.85.210. - Enhanced accessory dwelling units.
(a) EADUs may be allowed in the R-20,000 zone.
(b) EADUs may exceed the maximum permitted size allowed under Articie il above, subject to the maximum square footages set forth in Section 9.85.020. (c) Development standards.

EADUs shall be required to comply with all the requirements of the underlying zoning and all building requirements, including fire sprinklers. (2) EADUs shall be required to provide one additional parking space per unit. (3) EADUs shall be required to comply with the procedures set forth in Chapter 34 of the Development Code for Architectural Review, Significant.

SECTION 4. Section 9.85.300(2) of the Bradbury Development Code is amended to read as follows; all other sections remain the same:
(2) Accessory living quarters are permitted only on residential lots which are developed with an existing or proposed primary single-family unit. The accessory living quarters may not be built before the primary single-family unit.

SECTION 5. Section 9.85.410(4) of the Bradbury Development Code is amended to read as follows; all other sections remain the same:
(4) Unless demolition or alteration is prohibited pursuant to subsection (c) above, a housing unit may be demolished.

SECTION 6. Section 9.85.420(11) of the Bradbury Development Code is amended to read as follows; all other sections remain the same:
(11) Height. The height of a new unit shall not exceed 18 feet unless the unit is built in a previously existing permitted space above a permitted ground floor area or garage.

SECTION 7. CEQA. This Ordinance is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15282(h) which provides a statutory exemption for the adoption of an ordinance regarding accessory dwelling units to implement the provisions of Sections 65852.1 and 65852.2 of the Government Code. As the standards of Government Code Section 65852.22 relating to junior accessory dwelling units are incorporated into Government Code 65852.2, this exemption covers junior accessory dwelling units as well. Regardless of whether the City adopts this Ordinance, accessory dwelling units and junior accessory -15- Ord. No. 388
dwelling units must be allowed in the City in accordance with the standards set forth in State Statute. Additionally, the provisions of SB 9 exempted an ordinance which implemented SB 9 from CEQA. Therefore, this Ordinance is categorically exempt under the provisions of state law as well as the common sense exemption of CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) which provides that CEQA does not apply where it can be seen with certainty that the project will not cause any impacts.

SECTION 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on the thirty-first date after passage.

SECTION 9. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereot, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subaivision, paragraph, sentence, ciause, or phrase be declared invalid.

SECTION 10. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the passage of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be entered in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute passage and adoption thereof in the records of the meeting at which time the same is passed and adopted.

SECTION 11. Transmission to HCD. The City Clerk shall send a copy of this Ordinance to the Department of Housing and Community Development as required by State law.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of October, 2023.

Richard G. Barakat
Mayor
ATTEST:

Diane Jensen
City Clerk
-16- Ord. No. 388

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §.

CITY OF BRADBURY
!, Diane Jensen, City Clerk of the City of Bradbury, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance, being Ordinance No. 388, was duly passed by the City Council of the City of Bradbury, signed by the Mayor of said City, and attested by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 17th day of October, 2023, that it was duly posted and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

Diane Jensen
City Clerk
City of Bradbury
-17- Ord. No. 388
Richard Barakat, Mayor (District 3)
Richard T. Hale, Mayor Pro Tem (District 1)
Monte Lewis, Council Member (District 2)
Bruce Lathrop, Council Member (District 4)
BRADBURY Elizabeth Bruny, Council Member (District 5)
City of Bradbury
Agenda Memo
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Kevin Kearney, City Manager
DATE: October 17, 2023
SUBJECT: PRESENTATION - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON'S RECAP

OF WORK ON WOODLYN LANE
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Public Works Permit #3892
2) Approved Traffic Control Map

SUMMARY
This item prompts a discussion with Southern California Edison regarding their September 7, 2023 work on Woodlyn Lane.

City Staff had been working with Southern California Edison (SCE) in February 2023 for proposed pole replacements to take place in April 2023. Dialogue between the City and SCE ensued and the permit was eventually finalized in April 2023 for an approximate start date in June 2023. April 2023 was the last time the City heard from SCE on this project.

The project, pursuant to the permit, was for two power pole replacements - one on 3 Woodlyn Lane and one on 13 Woodlyn Lane. Permit conditions stipulated "absolutely no roadway closures" and "notification shall be provided to the HOA at least one week prior to construction" . Contact information for HOA leaders was affixed to the permit for easy coordination in the field. The permit also stipulates that the "City of Bradbury Engineering Department shall be notified at least twenty-four (24) hours before start of work".

On the morning of September 7, 2023, the City started fielding complaints from Woodlyn Lane residents regarding SCE's unscheduled work. The initial complaints were about full road closures and lack of advanced noticing. The City almost immediately dispatched the City's Engineering Inspector. The Inspector met with SCE's contractor and advised them of the road closure issue(s) and inspected traffic control measures for compliance FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AGENDA ITEM #
Recap on SCE's Work on Woodlyn Lane

Page 2 of 2 ends

(
with the approved traffic control map. That morning, the City also advised SCE's permitting technicians and public affairs liaison of the issues and complaints to assist in resolving the field issues.

After the event, the City later heard complaints from residents regarding SCE's lack of noticing, full road closures, residents needing to help direct contractor truck traffic, and no/limited notification of electrical outage duration.

ATTACHMENT #1

SITE ADDRESS PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT
3d 13 " bodiyn Lane
APPLCATION FOR: ONETRUCTION X EXCAVATION X ENCROACHMENT

BRADBURY
PLAN CECK P8ROMLIS
00 Tentin don Sredury, CAS : ENCROACHMENT PLAN CHECK S131.81 (626) 358-3218 $363.68 2 ENCROACHMENT PERMIT SS51.13 $1,102.26 LOCATION FINAL MAP CHECK S2,18203/ SHEET $0.00
On Woodlyn Lane in front of #3 and #13 GRADING PLAN CHECK = SACRE OF $0.00 GRADING PERMIT < 3 ACREOF $0.00
PURPOSE DISTURBANCE 5327305 DISTURBANCE 53.306.79
2 (ea) Power Pole Replacements - TD2010925 & TD1985934 ADDITOHAL GRADING P.C. 52,182.03 $0.00 ADDITIONAL GRADING PERMIT S1,653.10 APPLICANT IMPROVEMENT PLANS P.C. S2,182.03 $0.00 IMPROVEMENT PLANS PERMIT S2204S3 PH * $0.00
Southern Cal. Edison 909-820-5256 LOT LINE ADIUSTMENT RC S1,07.02 S0.00 MISC. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS SSASSI $0.00
SUMPSWPP PLAN CHECK 5218203 50.00 SUMP/SWPPP PERMITS220453 50.00 MAILING ADDRESS 1515 Walnut Grove Ave. ADDNL.SUSMPSVPPR.C.S1.091.02 50.00 ADDNZ SUMPSWPPP PERMIT SI.10226 $0.00
CITY MISC PLAN CHECK $0.00 MISC. FEES
Rosemead STATE CA
91770 TECHNOLOGY FEE $66.14
CONTACT PERSON MOBILE # LONG TERM PLANNING FEE $10.91
909-265-2766 ISSUANCE FEE $95.86
Maria McFarlane BOND ABOURED
MISC $0.00
CONTRACTOR BOND MOUNT SO 00
CONTRACTOR LICENSE: Pomit*
LICENSE CLASS TOTAL FEE S1,638.85
MAILING ADDRESS CITY BUSINESS LICENSE # 3892
0419

CITY VALUATION
STATE ZIP RADBORS ESTATES 153 •

30.00 CONTACT PERSON MOBILE*

1. All work to be donc ia accordanca with the Sandard Spacification for Public Works Conscruction, Latest edition and addontas, unless otherwise spected. All work stall be pertomed by a contractor with the approprate sense.

ISHMATED Traffic controls througbout construction shall confonta to the current State of Califonis Msoual of Traffic Coatrols for SUCT DATE Construction and Msintenance Work Zoos, lates: cdition.

A copy of this permit ball be kept at the sile of work at all times and produced upon demand.

Maria McFarlane All work authorized under tis pennit MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN THE TIME SPECIFIED THEREIN, UNLESS SO L, (Permittee)
COMPLETED, THIS PERMIT SHALL BE VOID. An extension of time msy be gaunted if applied for twenty-four (24) houry Southern California Edison before permit expiros.
of (Company) vi
for permit to conscruct/excavate/encroach in the Public Highway at the locations described above, subjort to the provisions bereby make applicatior OF WORK by telephoning (909) 594-9702. Should the inspector find work in progress prior to notification by the Permittee required by the Municipel Code of the City of Bradbury. AND THE SPECIFIED REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY'S PERMIT and permit not on site daring construction, work may be stopped for a period of not less than the remainder of the day.

HEREON SPECIFIED AND ATTACHED. An addisional inspection foc not less than double the orighsal fee, will be changed for failure to apply for a permit prior to commacmcat of work.

In considcration of the grating of this permit, it is agreed by the applicant that the City of Bradbury, and any of their officors The holdor of any permit and any ageat, scrvant, or employoc working for said permit bolder on aay excavation and fill. or cmployees thercof shall be held barmless by the applicant from any lisbility of responsibility for any accident, loss, or shall inform himself and obtain all necessary information as to the existence and location of all underground pipes, lines. manholes, wires, signal devices, substructures, and appurtensaces of any utility, and tac City shall be protocted by the damage to persocs or propeny, happening or occuring as the proximate result of any of the work undertaken under tbe Permittee against say dsmage by reason of excavation or fill. Any damage caused to such underground installations, terms of this application and the penuit or permits which may be grantod in response thcreto, and that all of said liabilities appurtenances, or substructures, shall be paid for by Pecmittee. Such repairs as are requirod, shall be made or be caused are hereby assumed by the applicant. it is farther agroed that if any part of this inscallation interferes with the fature use of to be made by the City of Bradbury and billed to such Permittee who shall pay the same upon receipt or statement of the the highway by the general pablic. it must be removed or relocited, as desigasted by txe City Engineer at the expense of the cost of such repair.

Permitte or his successor in interest. Forma inspoction will be requited prior to placement of concrete and at the completion of work. At least weary-four (24) hours notice will be required before inspection can be provided.

Maria McFarlane Massacadene Work shall be performed berwoen the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.

Specific provisions and conditions may be appended to each permit. 4/13/2023 Durapers must have lighted barricades at cach cad and must be removed after seven (7) days.

General Tability, Antomobile, and Work's Compe anation Fosmace Cadiliostus sell ccompany DATE
THIS PBI-OT EXPIRES SIX. (6) MONTHS AFTER THE DATE OF ISSUANCE dis permit application por the saguicecon is as oudined in the Stroded Specifications So Pablic Woeks Constantion (Cohools), along with a cogy of the sproprinto contractor's licease.

GENERALIZED TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES

VICINITY - MAP MISCELLANEOUS DEVICES

NOT TO SCALE
* ROSSING HOURS PER THE ENCRONCHMENT PERAT STANDASD CONCITORS AS ISSUED BY THE AGENCY OR AS

CHANCELS ME ME ON TRALER (TYP
MISCELLANEOUS TEMP. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS

POST TUDE

HECHLY ANEMO CANCE

COLCAVE
POETONE LEGEND:
81-102 KuLA - PROPOSED WORK AREA

END DUSTING STRIPING
DETOUR

DUSTING CURB & GUTTER
144-8002 MUNICIPALITY BOUNDARY LINES

EXISTING DRIVEWAY(S)

MISCELLANEOUS REGULATORY SIGNS - CALTRANS BOUNDARY LINES

PROPOSED CHANHELIZATION LINE

ROAD EASTING FENCE LINE
CLOSED
PROPOSED FLAG PERSON VI/ 2-WAY RADIO

PROPOSED PORTASLE ARROW BOARD

PROPOSED PORTABLE MESSAGE SIGN
20 DELNEATORS SHALL BE SPACED AT 20° aC. NITHE 300' OF AN INTERSEOTIORL PA ME I BARCADE - FLASHING BEACON
• SQUALIZED INTERSECTION
PRO TRAFFIC SERVICES CITY OF BRADBURY - DEPT. OF ENGINEERING

DESION DEPARTMENT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
COVER
DESIONED BY: MARQUEZ, JOSE 2.17.2023 PROJECTI

POLE REPLACEMENT MARIA LOF ARLAHE
2010925 AGENCY COORDINATION
APPROVED BY: PRO TRAFFIC SERVICES
TOP NO. SPaDAUSI
III PERMIT 3 WOODLYN LN. CONST. PERMIT ORGANIZATIO
TCPMEPR03230231 M: 714.465.0038, PAX 12230
(поло носок) ADDITIONAL NOTES:

RA-S
RAM: 4606795E POLE
1: 46067956P053
DEODAR LN. 25 MPH POSTED NO STOPPING ANY TIME
DORNSTREAL 100' WORK AREA
our 4W3-4

YOSA(CA)
4W20-4
WOODLYN LN. 25 MPH
POSTED NO STOPPING ANY TME 1420-1
G20-21
COÁ(CA)E*
100.

W20-47
3ơ' 20 1ợ*
25 PRO TRAFFIC SERVICES
*SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY CITY OF BRADBURY - DEPT. OF ENGINEERING

DESIGN DIPARTMENT
CES &
DESIGNED BY: MARQUEZ, JOSE 217.2023 "ВЗАР HO.

POLE REPLACEMENT 2010925
APPROVED BY: PRO TRAFFIC SERVICES
PERMIT 8 3 WOODLYN LN. TCPMEPR03230231

GENERALIZED TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES

VICINITY - MAP MISCELLANEOUS DEVICES

NOT TO SCALE
• ORONG HOURS PER THE ENCROACHSENT PEST STANDARD CORDIONS AS ISSUED BY THE ADENCY OR AS MISCELLANEOUS TEMP. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS

HAHLEYE WARIN CENCE
LEGEND:
- PROPOICE 4010

ERE END DISTING STRING
DETOUR

EISTING CURB & GUTTER
M-1932. MUNIOSPALITY BOUNDARY LINES

I DWY - EXISTING DRIVEWAY(S)

MISCELLANEOUS REGULATORY SIGNS CALTRANS BOUNDARY LINES
- PROPOSED CHANNELIZATION LINE
CLOSED
PROPOSED FLAG PERSON V/ 2-WAY RADIO

PROPOSED FORTABLE ARROW BOARD

PROPOSED PORTABLE MESSAGE SIGN

20. DEUINEATORS SHALL BE SPACED AT 20° O.G. WITHIN 300' OF ANI INTERSECTIONL (SC ПРЕ В BABCADE - PROSON MPE I BARRCIDE
- FLASHING BEACON
19-10 - SCIALIZED BITERSECTION
PRO TRAFFIC SERVICES CUmm CITY OF BRADBURY - DEPT. OF ENGINEERING

UNSON IRATED SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

DESION DIPARTINENT
SO TAPERS ESP DESIONED BY: MARQUEZ. JOSE 2.27.2023 MARIA DEPARLAND

POLE ACCESS
1985934 AGENCY COORDINA HON
APPROVED BY: PRO TRAFFIC SERVICES
TOP NO. PLOUS
PERMIT S 13 WOODLYN LN. CONST. PERMIT ORCANIZATION
TCPMEPR03230262 11. 714.405 0038, PAX:12239
ADDITIONAL NOTES:

RĐ-3 0a0-2.

A 6775150000

E) EDISON MRE
IN: 1647751E POL
EX: 4857342E POLE.

POSTED NO STOPPING ANY AME
100' WORDS AREA
4873-4
1C9ACA) 4420-4
WOODLYN I.N. 25 MPH G20-21
W3-4F
POSTER HO STOPPING ANX DUE.

W3-4F

APPROVED

COA(CA)E
V20-4F
1020-2
PLANS PREPARED BY: PRO TRAFFIC SERVICES
*SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY CITY OF BRADBURY - DEPT. OF ENGINEERING

DESIGN DEPARTHENT DATE
DESIGNED BY! MARQUEZ, JOSE 2.27.2023 PROJECT WEAP NO. DICATE POLE ACCESS 1835934
APPROVED BY! PRO TRAFFIC SERVICES
AUDNE33T7
PERMIT S 13 WOODLYN LN. -T7L 480, PA PANL120
TOPMEPR03230282
(
SGVCOG City Council Road Show
The SGVCOG Staff will be providing updates on the SGVCOG programs, accomplishments and goals for the upcoming year.

Richard Barakat, Mayor (District 3)
Richard I. Hale, Mayor Pro Tem (District 1)
Monte Lewis, Council Member (District 2)
Bruce Lathrop, Council Member (District 4)
BRADBURY Elizabeth Bruny, Council Member (District 5)
City of Bradbury
Agenda Memo
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Kevin Kearney, City Manager
DATE: October 17, 2023
SUBJECT: PRESENTATION - AN UPDATE BY CALIFORINA AMERICAN

WATER ON THE LEMON AVENUE RESERVOIR
ATTACHMENTS: 1) August 16, 2022 Minutes
2) February 15 2022 Minutes
( 3) Bradbury Municipal Code Dealing with Open Space

RECOMMENDATION
California American Water has been working toward the retirement of the Lemon Avenue Reservoir site, and the draft plans are now close to finalization and will be presented during the meeting. It is recommended that the City Council review the presented draft plans and provide any feedback.

SUMMARY
California American Water ('Cal-Am') has been coordinating with City Staff on the demo, tilling, and landscaping of the 1.65 acre Lemon Avenue Reservoir site. During the February 2022 City Council meeting, CalAm presented plans that included approximately 26,000 cubic yards of soils import with no solidified plans on its future use. Ultimately, the City Council directed Staff to further work with Cal-Am to refine the project (ATTACHMENT #1). Cal-Am later returned during the August 16, 2022 meeting where they proposed approximately 15,000 cubic yards of soils import. At the time, Cal-Am conducted a study that suggested that the site may be used for additional water storage.

The timeline, however, for the construction of such water storage was unknown.

Ultimately, the City Council directed Staff and Councilmember Hale to work with Cal-Am to further refine the project (ATTACHMENT #2).

FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AGENDA ITEM #
Presentation by CalAm on the Lemon Reservoir Site

Page 2 of 2 ends

DRA
to further refine the project (ATTACHMENT #2).

After working with Cal-Am over the last year, the draft plan is now close to finalization.

The current proposal is to demo the existing concrete reservoir, import XXX cubic yards of soils, and sell the space for a future single-family residential development. The current thought is that the parcel would become part of the Estates HOA.

The initial estimates of importing 26,000 cubic yards of soil to fill the Reservoir site will bring impacts to both Bradbury and Monrovia. The import of soil will be transported by an approximate 3,250 haul trucks. It is assumed soils import and grading would take place over 25 days, which translates into about 130 trucks per day (3,250 trucks/25 days = 130 trucks per day). The current haul route from the project site is west on Lemon Avenue, then south on Mountain Avenue to the 210 freeway. The route passes by the Bradoaks Elementary School, in Monrovia, so Cal-Am will be coordinating with the City to secure the appropriate approvals.

ATTACHMENT #1

MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRADBURY
HELD ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 16, 2022

AT THE BRADBURY CIVIC CENTER
600 WINSTON AVENUE, BRADBURY, CA 91008
CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54953(e) (1), CODE SECTION 54953(e)(1): the City is allowing Councilmembers, Staff and the public to participate in this meeting by means of a Zoom video or telephone call. Participants will be able to hear the entire proceedings and be able to speak during Public Comment, Public Hearing, and other authorized times. Members of the public must maintain silence and mute their microphones and telephones except during those times.

MEETING CALLED TO ORDER: The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Bradbury was called to order by Mayor Lathrop at 7:00 p.m. followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.

ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Mayor Lathrop, Mayor Pro-Tem Barakat, Councilmembers Hale and Bruny
ABSENT: Councilmember Lewis
STAFF: City Manager Kearney, City Attorney Reisman,
City Clerk Saldana and Management Analyst Musa
COUNCILMEMBER LEWIS EXCUSED: Mayor Pro-Tem Barakat made a motion to excuse Council- member Lewis from the meeting. Councilmember Hale
seconded the motion, which carried.

APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Councilmember Hale made a motion to approve the agenda to proceed with City business. Mayor Pro-Tem Barakat seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

DISCLOSURE OF ITEMS REQUIRED BY In compliance with the California Political Reform Act, each City GOV. CODE SECTION 1090 & 81000 Councilmember has the responsibility to disclose direct or ET SEQ,: indirect potential for a personal financial impact as a result of participation in the decision-making process concerning agenda items.

City Attorney Reisman stated that he was not aware of any potential conflicts of interest.

Page 1 of 9 ends

A. Minutes: Regular Meeting of July 19, 2022
B. Resolution No. 22-22: Demands & Warrants for August 2022 C. Monthly Investment Report for the month of July 2022....

MOTION TO APPROVE Councilmember Hale made a motion to approve the Consent CONSENT CALENDAR: Calendar as presented. Mayor Pro-Tem Barakat seconded the motion, which was carried by the following roll call vote:

APPROVED: AYES: Mayor Lathrop, Mayor Pro-Tem Barakat,
Councilmembers Hale and Bruny
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Lewis
Motion passed 4:0
APPROVAL OF CONSULTANT City Manager Kearney stated that Government Code Section

AGREEMENT WITH DE NOVO PLANNING
GROUP FOR UPDATE OF THE SAFETY 6532(l) Elean eneral Care ores recordo later CHAPTER OF THE HEALTH AND SAFETY Element) with the revision of the Housing Element.

ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN:

California Government Code Section 65302(g) relating to Safety Elements of the General Plan has been amended to include analysis of additional topics, including those related to wildfires and climate adaptation and resiliency. While the recent hazard mitigation plan addresses many of the wildfire
requirements, it does not address climate adaptation and resiliency. Staff does not have the expertise to prepare this update.

The City reached out to two consultants that is has been working before with to obtain a proposal for the update of the Safety Chapter of the Health & Safety Element. Only De Novo Planning Group provided a response. De Novo is a well-
respected planning firm that has prepared Safety Element updates for a number of cities (i.e. Gardena and Hawthorne).

PROPOSAL: De Novo has provided a proposal for $37,250. The project is billed on the time expended, but it is a "not-to-exceed contract." Staff has checked with other cities updating their Safety Element as to costs and it is in line with those cities.

RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Agreement between the City of Bradbury and De Novo
Planning Group, Inc. for services to update the City's Safety Element at a not-to-exceed amount of $37,250.

DISCUSSION: • Manager Kearney stated that this discussion was continued from the July meeting and staff supplied the City Council with more information, such as:
• City of Los Angeles: Safety Element Background &
Summary of Amendments;
• Introducing SB 379: Climate Adaptation and Resiliency Strategies; and
SCAG: Southern California Climate Adaptation
Framework
Minutes CC Meeting
August 16, 2022

Page 2 of 9 ends

Perry Banner from De Novo Planning Group was online to
answer questions about the Safety Element Update.

Councilmember Hale asked how long the process takes. City Manager Kearney stated that the time table is in De Novo's proposal.

City Manager Kearney stated that the City Council approves the Safety Element, not the HCD (Department of Housing and Community Development).

There will be two public hearings: one with the City Council and one with the Planning Commission. Community input can be taken at the regular City Council meeting and regular Planning Commission meeting.

MOTION TO APPROVE AGREEMENT Councilmember Hale made a motion to approve the WITH DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP: Professional Services Agreement with De Novo Planning Group, Inc. for the Preparation of an Update to the Safety Chapter of the Safety Element of the General Plan at a not-to- exceed amount of $37,250. Mayor Pro-Tem Barakat seconded the motion, which was carried by the following roll call vote:

APPROVED: AYES: Mayor Lathrop, Mayor Pro-Tem Barakat,
Councilmembers Hale and Bruny
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Lewis
Motion passed 4:0
PRESENTATION - AN UPDATE BY City Manager Kearney stated that California American Water CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER ON (Cal-Am) has been coordinating with City Staff on the THE LEMON AVENUE RESERVOIR: demolition, filling, and landscaping of the Lemon Avenue reservoir. At the February 2022 City Council meeting, Cal-Am presented plans that included estimates of 26,000 cubic yards of import soil transported by approximately 3,250 haul trucks to fill the Reservoir. It was assumed soils import and grading would take place over 25 days, which translated to about 130 trucks per day. The City Council commented that the import of soils seemed excessive, especially since Cal-Am did not have immediate plans to develop the site. Since the February meeting, Cal-Am has revised their plans and reduced the volume of import. The initial estimates of 26,000 cubic yards of import soil has now been reduced to approximately 15,000 cubic yards.

HAUL ROUTE: The current haul route from the project site is west on Lemon Avenue, then south of Mountain Avenue to the 210 Freeway.

The route passes by the Wild Rose Elementary School in
Monrovia, and an additional assessment would need to be conducted on the health risks.

LONG-TERM PLANS FOR It is unknown at this time what will happen to the Reservoir site RESERVOIR SITE: in the long term. Cal-Am has conducted a study on system- wide storage, and the results of the study suggested it as a site for additional water storage. However, Staff has been told that Minutes CC Meeting
August 16, 2022

Page 3 of 9 ends

the timeline associated with the construction of such water storage is unknown.

CAL-AM REPRESENATIVES: (Name), Civil Engineer, and Brandan (Name), Landscape Architect, were online to make the presentation and answer questions from the City Council.

DISCUSSION: Councilmember Hale stated that he is not comfortable with the project, because he is concerned that Cal-Am will fill the site and then put a new tank on top. Councilmember Hale also was concerned about the traffic and the nearby school. Maybe Cal- Am should to post a bond for the road.

Councilmember Hale stated that he wants to see the plans and asked if our City Engineer, David Gilbertson, could look at them as well.

Councilmember Hale stated that he built a tank for Cal-Am in the past which included landscaping. As soon as the tank was finished, Cal-Am shut off the water and all of the landscaping died. He does not want that to happen again.

The Cal-Am Representatives stated that the current site is getting watered, but right now water conservation is necessary.

Other than that, is Cal-Am going in the right direction? ACTION TAKEN: City Manager Kearney stated that he will set up a meeting between Cal-Am, the City Engineer and Councilmember Hale to look at the finalized plans for the Lemon Water Reservoir.

PRESENTATION BY SOUTHERN Jeanette Soriano, Government Relations Manager, and Albert CALIFORNIA EDISON ON WILDFIRE Diaz, District Manager of Monrovia, gave a presentation on MITIGATION EFFORTS: Wildfire Mitigation Efforts by Southern California Edison.

The topics of the Power Point Presentation included:
• 2021 Wildfire Season
• SCE's Wildfire Mitigation Activities
• Public Safety Power Shutoffs (PSPS)
• Reducing the Need for PSPS
PSPS Communications
• Customer Programs and Resources
Edison provided Council and Staff with a sample of Insulated Wire.

DISCUSSION: Mayor Lathrop inquired if the City could use its Rule 20A money to pay for insulated wire in the City of Bradbury.

Ms. Soriano stated that this would be a great idea, but that the Rule 20A program is for undergrounding utilities only and that the PUC is retiring the Rule 20A program soon.

Minutes CC Meeting
August 16, 2022

Page 4 of 9 ends

DISCUSSION OF THE ANNEXATION City Manager Kearney stated that the City of Bradbury OF THE ROYAL OAKS RETIREMENT redistricted in 2021. As part of the process, the City Council COMMUNITY: directed Staff to annex a portion of Royal Oaks Drive North,. directly below the Retirement Community ("Manor"), which was found to be in Los Angeles County territory. Such an
annexation would ensure that Bradbury's District Three meets regulations regarding district contiguity. Staff recently learned of a Duarte Councilmember's desire to annex the Retirement Community, which would affect Bradbury's current District map and annexation efforts of a portion of Royal Oaks Drive North.

ANALYSIS: It is Staff's understanding that since the incorporation of Bradbury in 1957, the Retirement Community has always been an unincorporated parcel of land belonging to Los Angeles County. The Retirement Community has a lot size of
approximately 17.71 acres and the County Assessor's map shows the property divided by three legal lot lines (pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act).

The following are current resident estimates of the Retirement Community in comparison to Bradbury:

Population:

City of Bradbury - 925
Retirement Community - 260
Number of registered Voters:

City of Bradbury - 650
Retirement Community - 199
City Staff recently met with the Manor's Executive Director to better understand the Community and its desire for annexation.

OPTIONS: City Manager Kearney stated that there are a few options the City Council can explore in response to a potential City of Duarte annexation of the Retirement Community:

1. The City of Bradbury could annex the entire Retirement community

2. The City of Duarte could annex the maiority of the
Retirement Community and Bradbury could annex a
side and/or northern most section;

3. The City of Duarte could annex the entire Retirement Community;

4. The City of Bradbury could continue with its current annexation plan through LAFCO since an application is
already pending.

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: A Bradbury annexation of the Retirement Community is unlikely to produce significant property tax revenue since the property belongs to a non-profit organization. After credits for the claimed, non-profit exemption, initial estimates assume City property tax revenues to be approximately $500 a year. There could be additional future revenue sources for planning reviews and building permits.

Minutes CC Meeting
August 16, 2022

Page 5 of 9 ends

INFORMAL CONTRACT WITH Staff has entered into an informal contract with Bear Demo- BEAR DEMOGRAPHICS: graphics and Research, Inc. for a not-to-exceed amount of $2,500 to provide initial consulting services on an hourly basis to advise Staff on a potential annexation and/or redistricting.

RECOMMENDATION: This item is a review of the background on the 2021 redistricting, the efforts to annex a portion of Royal Oaks Dive North, and options for the City Council to explore if the City of Duarte were to annex the Retirement Community. It is
recommended that the City Council direct Staff on how to DISCUSSION: Mayor Lathrop stated that he is not in favor of annexing the entire Retirement Community.

Mayor Pro-Tem Barakat felt that the City does not need to do anything about the redistricting.

Councilmember Hale also does not want to annex the entire Manor, because the residents would make up an entire district.

Mayor Lathrop inquired if Duarte can annex the Manor. Andrew Westall from Bear Demographics replied that is up to LAFCO.

Councilmember Bruny was also not in favor of annexing the Manor.

PUBLIC COMMENT: Mr. Andrew Smith, Executive Director of the Royal Manor, stated that they prefer a full annexation by either the City of Bradbury or the City of Duarte. They don't want to be part of Los Angeles County.

MOTION: Councilmember Hale made a motion for Bradbury to continue with its current annexation plan through LAFCO and to let Duarte annex the Manor. Mayor Pro-Tem Barakat seconded
the motion.

COMMENT FROM LAFCO: Paul Novak of LAFCO stated that under the current law cities must be contiguous. In our scenario the City of Duarte is not contiguous with the Manor. The City Council needs to amend its motion to explore other option, because the Duarte Mesa MORE DISCUSSION: Mayor Pro-Tem Barakat stated that Duarte Councilmember Margaret Finley wants Duarte to annex the Manor. Mayor Pro- Tem Barakat suggested to let Duarte or the County maintain Royal Oaks Trail.

Mayor Lathrop said let Duarte do what they want to do.

AMENDED MOTION: Councilmember Hale amended his motion for the City of Bradbury to do nothing, to withdraw our application with LAFCO for the annexation of a portion of Royal Oaks Trail and to send a letter to the County to ask them to maintain the trail in front of the Manor. Mayor Pro-Tem Barakat seconded the
motion, which was carried by the following roll call vote:

Minutes CC Meeting
August 16, 2022

Page 6 of 9 ends

APPROVED: AYES: Mayor Lathrop, Mayor Pro-Tem Barakat,
Councilmembers Hale and Bruny
NOES: None....

ABSENT: Councilmember Lewis
Motion passed 4:0
DISCUSSION ON THE UPCOMING City Manager Kearney stated that this is an ongoing discussion RETIREMENT OF THE CITY CLERK: about the planned retirement of City Clerk Claudia Saldana in the spring of 2023, and the challenges associated with filling her position. This is an informal discussion with no formal recommended actions. Rather, this item seeks input from the City Council on how they would like to proceed. It is expected that there will be multiple discussions on this item in the next few months.

The City Clerk's position has expanded with the City's needs since she started working for the City in June of 1988. Today Claudia's position has three main functions. These roles and responsibilities are equivalent in other cities to 1) City Clerk, 2) Accounting Technician, and 3) Executive Assistant to the City City Manager Kearney stated the City Council discussed this item at the July 2022 meeting and requested additional job descriptions for both the positions of City Clerk and Accounting Technician. The City Council additionally requested the most recent Bradbury job announcement for the Management
Mayor Lathrop stated that the City should outsource payroll and some of the light accounting could be done by the Management Analyst. City Manager Kearney stated that the Management Analyst position was not recruited for accounting tasks. City Manager Kearney also stated that he asked the current
Management Analyst if she would be willing to take over some of Claudia's responsibilities and she declined.

Councilmember Bruny inquired about what the part-time
Finance Director's responsibilities are. City Manager Kearney prepares the City's financial reports, completes reports required by the State Controller's Office, prepares Journal Entries, manages investments (CDs) for the City, and is the main liaison for City audits. It would not make sense to have the Finance Director take over Claudia's responsibilities as he gets paid $87/hour, because he is a CPA. On top of that, the Finance Director is at the office only once a week for half a day and may not be available to dedicate more time to Bradbury.

NO ACTION TAKEN: This was an informal discussion and the City Council took no formal action. It is expected that there will be more discussions regarding this item over the next few months.

Minutes CC Meeting
August 16, 2022

Page 7 of 9 ends

DISCUSSION ON THE USE OF Management Analyst Musa stated that the City received $5,000 CAL RECYCLE FUNDS: from the CaRecycle Beverage Container Recycling/County Payment Program. At the April City Council Meeting, Staff was directed to contact the City of Duarte about partnering and installing a water refili station on the Duarte portion of Royai Oaks Trail. City Staff identified an old water refill station that needs to be replaced but the proposal was complicated due to an existing partnership between Duarte and a third-party organization in regards to a plaque that would be placed on the water refill station stating that it was a donation from the City of Bradbury. Since then, the City of Duarte has designated two more potential locations for a water refill station to be installed RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council review both potential locations and approve one of the proposed areas for the installation of a water refill station for the City of Duarte at a not-to-exceed amount of $7,500.

DISCUSSION:

Olive Drive.

DIRECTION TO STAFF: The City Council directed Staff to identify possible locations for a water refill station in the City of Bradbury and to report back at the next City Council meeting.

DISCUSSION AND UPDATE ON Bradbury Night Out (BNO) is an annual event to celebrate the BRADBURY NIGHT OUT: City's anniversary and National Night Out. This year's Bradbury Night Out took place on July 28, 2022. Management Analyst Musa reported that we had over 26 service providers hosting a booth and three food vendors. Residents enjoyed the variety of vendors present, especially the Wildlife Learning Center, which brought several animals, including a porcupine armadillo hedgehog, owl and more. One of the highlights of BNO was th attendance of Los Angeles County Supervisor Kathryn Barger.

The City allocated $10,000 for the event but only spent $7,000 Based on the feedback received from residents and vendors, the main challenge was long wait times for food and event parking. Staff hopes to improve the parking situation and will consider hiring a different food vendor for next year's event.

MATTERS FROM THE CITY MANAGER: City Manager Kearney stated that the CSO contract with the City of Monrovia should be ready soon and that we may have o call a Special Meeting before the regular September Cit Council Meeting to adopt the contraci
MATTERS FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY: City Attorney Reisman stated that he enjoyed Bradbury Night Out and that he bonded with an owl (Zeus from the Wildlife Learning Center).

Minutes CC Meeting
August 16, 2022

Page 8 of 9 ends

MATTERS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL:

MAYOR LATHROP: Nothing to report
COUNCILMEMBER BARAKAT: Nothing to report
COUNCILMEMBER HALE: Nothing to report
COUNCILMEMBER LEWIS: Not present
COUNCILMEMBER BRUNY: Nothing to report
ITEMS FOR FUTURE AGENDAS: None

CLOSED SESSION
PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING None
CLOSED SESSION ONLY:

RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION: The City Council adjourned to a Closed Session to discuss:

A. Appointment of Temporary Public Employee
Government Code Section 54957(b) (1)
Title: Management Analyst
REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION: City Attorney Reisman reported that the City Council met in Closed Session to discuss the matter regarding the
Management Analyst. No formal votes were taken or required.

ADJOURNMENT: At 9:15 p.m. Mayor Lathrop adjourned the meeting to a regular meeting to be held on Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at
7:00 p.m.
swah
MAYÓR - CITY OF BRADBURY
ATTEST:

Claudia Saldana

CITY CLERK - CITY OF BRADBURY
Minutes CC Meeting
August 16, 2022

Page 9 of 9 ends

ATTACHMENT #2

MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRADBURY
HELD ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2022
EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 25-20: Pursuant to Governor Newsom's Executive Order N-25-20, the City is allowing Council Members, Staff and the public to participate in this City Council meeting by means of a Zoom video or telephone call.

Participants will be able to hear the entire proceedings (other than the Closed Session) and be able to speak during Public Comment, Public Hearing, and other authorized times. Members of the public must maintain silence and mute their microphones and telephones except during those times.

MEETING CALLED TO ORDER: The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Bradbury was called to order by Mayor Bruny at 7:00 p.m. followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.

ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Mayor Bruny (remote), Mayor Pro-Tem Lathro:
'ouncilmembers Barakat, Hale and Lewi
ABSENT: None
STAFF: City Manager Kearney, City Attorney Reisman,
City Clerk Saldana and Management Analyst Musa
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Councilmember Hale made a motion to approve the agenda to proceed with City business. Mayor Pro-Tem Lathrop seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

PUBLIC COMMENT: None
CONSENT CALENDAR: All items on the Consent Calendar are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion unless a Councilmember requests otherwise, in which case the item will be removed and considered by separate action. All
Resolutions and Ordinances for Second Reading on the
Consent Calendar are deemed to "waive further reading and adopt."
A. Minutes: Regular Meeting of January 18, 2022
B. Resolution No. 22-05: Demands & Warrants for
February 2022
C. Monthly Investment Report for the month of
January 2022
• Resolution No. 22-06: Approving the Renewal of the
General Services Agreement with the County of Los
Angeles, ending June 20, 2027
Minutes CC Meeting
February 15, 2022

Page 1 of 4 ends

E. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 382:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

BRADBURY AMENDING -THE-BRADBURY MUNICIPAL CODE

TO ENACT CALIFORNIA STATE ORGANIC WASTE DISPOSAL

REQUIREMENTS
MOTION TO APPROVE Councilmember Hale made. a motion to approve Consent CONSENT CALENDAR: Calendar as presented. Councilmember Barakat seconded the motion, which was carried by the following roll call vote:

APPROVED: AYES: Mayor Bruny, Mayor Pro-Tem Lathrop,
Councilmembers Barakat, Hale and Lewis
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Motion passed 5:0
PRESENTATION: AN UPDATE BY Ity Manager Kearney stated that California American Wate CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER CO. ompany (Cal-Am) has been coordinating with Staff on the ON THE LEMON AVENUE RESERVOIR: demolition, filling, and landscaping of the Lemon Avenue Reservoir site. Current estimates suggest there will be 26,000 cubic yards if import soil transported by approximately 3,250 truck hauls to fill the reservoir. It is assumed soils import and grading would take place over 25 days, which translates to about 130 truckloads per day.

The current haul route from the project site is west on Lemon Avenue, then south on Mountain Avenue to the 210 Freeway The route passes by Wildrose Avenue Elementary School in Monrovia, and an additional assessment would be conducted on the health risks.

It is unknown at this time what will happen to the Reservoir site in the long term. Cal-Am is currently conducting a study on system-side water storage, and it is possible the results of the study would pinpoint the Reservoir as a site for additional water storage. However, Staff has been told that the study might not be completed for a few months.

CAL-AM REPRESENTATIVES: Brian Baretto, External Affairs Manager, and Mark Reifer, Engineering Manager, were present online to entertain
questions from the City Council.

DISCUSSION: Councilmember Hale stated that he is opposed to Cal-Am bringing in 26,000 cubic yards of dirt. Councilmember Hale also stated that the site could be used as open space for the community or to split the lot and put in a home.

Councilmember Hale stated that the water tank should be in the ground as low as possible because it looks ugly. Mark Reifer stated that the current water tank is 12 feet above and 20 feet below ground. Cal-Am is considering to remove the reservoir and add a new tank. The current tank used to be part of the old agricultural water system.

Minutes CC Meeting
February 15, 2022

Page 2 of 4 ends

Mayor Pro-Tem Lathrop inquired if the plans for the site will go the Planning Commission for review. City Manager Kearney replied yes, eventually Councilmember Hale stated that he would like to see the plans before they go to the Planning Commission.
ark Reifer stated that Ca-Am can work with the Citv
andscape architec
ACTION: City Manager Kearney stated that staff will work with Cal-Am on the new plan and bring it back to the City Council for review.

DISCUSSION ON CITY COUNCIL City Manager Kearney stated that Councilmember Barakat COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS: recently became aware that Mayor Bruny is the Representative for Foothill Transit and he the Alternate and asked if that was Council's desire when they made the appointments in June of 2021. Mayor Bruny stated that she had no issue with switching positions.

MOTION TO MAKE APPOINTMENTS Councilmember Hale made a motion to appoint TO FOOTHILL TRANSIT: Councilmember Barakat as the Representative, and Mayor Bruny as the Alternate to Foothill Transit. Mayor Pro-Tem Lathrop seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

MATTERS FROM THE CITY MANAGER: Nothing to report
MATTERS FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY: Nothing to report
MATTERS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL:

MAYOR BRUNY: Nothing to report
MAYOR PRO-TEM LATHROP: Mayor Pro-Tem Lathrop reported a burglary on Fairlee Avenue on Friday, February 11, 2022. Councilmember Barakat inquired about the License Plate Readers the City installed. City Manager Kearney stated that the Sheriffs Department is
checking those and neighbors' cameras too.

COUNCILMEMBER BARAKAT: Nothing to report
COUNCILMEMBER HALE: Nothing to report
COUNCILMEMBER LEWIS: Nothing to report
ITEMS FOR FUTURE AGENDAS: None
ADJOURNMENT: At 7:25 p.m. Mayor Bruny adjourned the meeting to a Study Session (to discuss Planning Matters related to the Housing Element Update) on Monday, March 7, 2022 at 6:00 p.m.

Elnater a Brun

MAYOR - CITY OF BRADBURY
Minutes CC Meeting
February 15, 2022

Page 3 of 4 ends

ATTEST:

Claudi aldana

CITY CLERK - CITY OF BRADBURY
Minutes CC Meeting
February 15, 2022

Page 4 of 4 ends

ATTACHMENT #3
The Lemon Avenue Reservoir is zoned OS - Open Space. Here is the Bradbury Municipal Code dealing with such zoning:

Sec. 9.76.010. - Purpose of chapter.

Certain areas of the City are so located, configured, or possessed of such geologic features that the residential or other structural use thereof may endanger the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City, or such areas are necessary for the preservation of natural resources within the community, and for said reasons these areas are classified herein as open space use, known and designated as Zone OS.

Sec. 9.76.020. - Permitted uses.

The following uses shall be permitted uses within the OS zone:
(1) Propagation nurseries and horticultural uses, provided that no dwellings, either temporary or permanent, be permitted in relation thereto, nor any on-premises sales or advertising.

Sec. 9.76.030. - Conditional uses.

The following public and private uses may be permitted within the OS zone only if the location and development are approved by the City as a conditional use pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 49 of this title:
(1) Flood control channels, spreading grounds, settling basins, freeways, and parkways. (2) Parks, playgrounds, wildlife preserves, recreation areas, and such non-occupied buildings and structures as are accessory thereto.
(3) Water wells, reservoirs, tanks, dams, treatment plants, gauging stations, pumping stations, and any use normal and appurtenant to the obtainment, storage and distribution of water.
(4) Electric transmission substations, electric distribution stations, communications equipment building, microwave radio and telephone transmission facilities uses in the operation of public utility functions.

Sec. 9.76.040. - Uses expressly prohibited. The following uses are expressly prohibited within the OS zone:
(1) Residential uses.
(2) Commercial uses other than those regulated and under the regulation of the parks and/or City, County or State recreational agency.
(3) Industrial uses.
(4) Other uses. Any use not expressly permitted in Section 9.76.020 or 9.76.030.

Sec. 9.76.050. - Development standards.

All property in the OS zone shall be developed in accordance with the requirements specified in any conditionai use permit granted therefor pursuant to Chapter 49 of this titie and according to the following standards:
(1) Lot area. No limitation.
(2) Lot dimension. No requirements.
(3) Yards. Yards may be established by the Planning Commission pursuant to the conditions of approval that may be imposed as part of the project architectural review. (4) Population density. No dwelling units are permitted in this zone. (5) Lot coverage. No structures permitted except for accessory buildings or structures related to public, park and recreational facilities. In no case shall building coverage exceed ten percent of the total lot area.
(6) Building height. No building or structure erected in this zone shall have a height greater than 18 feet.

Richard Barakat, Mayor (District 3)
Richard I. Hale, Jr., Mayor Pro Tem (District 1)
80EE Monte Lewis, Council Member (District 2)
Bruce Lathrop, Council Member (District 4)
BRADBURY Elizabeth Bruny, Council Member (District 5)
City of Bradbury
Agenda Memo
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Kevin Kearney, City Manager
Suresh Malkani, Finance Director
DATE: October 17, 2023
SUBJECT: FISCAL YEAR 2021-2022 ANNUAL FINANCIAL AUDIT REPORT ATTACHMENT: 1) FY 2021-22 Audit Report

SUMMARY
As required by local and State law, the City of Bradbury must complete an annual audit of its financial activities. The Pun Group has completed its independent audit of the City's general-purpose financial statements for Fiscal Year 2021-22 and reported several internal control findings. During the presentation of this item, Staff will be responding to these conditions and providing future resolutions.

It is recommended the City Council receive and file the Annual Financial Report as presented.

ANALYSIS
The Pun Group Accountants & Advisors have prepared the annual independent auditor's report and general-purpose financial statement for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. The work was completed in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States.

It was determined that the statements present fairly in all material respects the financial tos in of recity of Bear it it card tries These sings, and ly san responses are presented below:

FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AGENDA ITEM #
FY 21-22 Audit Report

Page 2 of 4 ends

Finding 2022-001 Internal Control Over Financial Reports Condition:

1. Audit Adjusting Journal Entries:
• Since the commencement of the audit, 14 audit journal entries were noted to correct the trial balance provided by the City.
> Staff Response: The year end closing procedures have not beer done in previous years but will now be established by the Finance Director to reduce the risk of these omissions.

2. Accounts Receivable and Revenue:

The City did not properly reconcile grant related revenue and expenditures • This resulted in the prior period adjustment
Rese received in ey or thor grani ree at ecs that a
auditors should have brought this to Staff's attention in the previous year instead of noticing it in FY 21/22. As such, it resulted in the prior period adjustment.

3. Accounts Payable:

The City did not properly accrue invoices received after year-end. > Response: There were some invoices that were omitted to be accrued and were recorded in FY 22/23 instead. Staff will ensure that invoices are recorded in the first quarter of the next fiscal year and are reviewed to make sure that the accruals are not missed.

4. Capital Assets:
• Due to not properly accruing invoices received after year-end, the capital assets addition was not accurately accounted for.

Response: Same as #3 above.

5. Prior period adjustment noted due to improper recognizing American Resue Plan Act grant revenue.

Response: Same as #2 above.

6. The delay in timely and properly closing the books resulted in the preparation of the basic financial statements was delayed.
• Response: Books have been closed every month in the following FY 22/23 and in the current fiscal year.

Cause:

The City did not have standard year-end closing procedures to reduce errors recorded by the City's general ledger.

FY 21-22 Audit Report

Page 3 of 4 ends

Recommendation:

We recommend that the City establish effective year end closing procedures that reduce the risk that there are accounting errors and the need for correcting journai entries after the year end closing. These procedures would include timely review and approval by management of account reconciliations, sub-ledger transactions, cutoff review for account balances at the fund and overall government-wide level, and revenue and expenditures/expense review. Revenue and expenditures/expenses should be compared to the prior year or prior year trends and to the budget.

View of Responsible Officials:

1. The Finance Director will establish the year end closing procedures to reduce the risk of accounting errors.
› Response: The revenues and expenses for the first quarter of the next fiscal year will be reviewed to check if there are any pertaining to previous periods so that those are accrued in the proper year.

Staff will also make sure they were properly classified as operational or capital expenses.

2. The analysis and comparison to the budget analysis will be done on monthly basis to avoid the adjustment entries recommended by auditors.

Response: Staff will continue to close the books on a monthly basis and critically review the actual and budgeted costs so that if there are any errors or omissions those are taken care of promptly.

The City Council's approval and acceptance of the Fiscal Year 2020-21 audited financial report is needed to remain in compliance with local, State and Federal law.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended the City Council receive and file the Annual Financial Audit Report as presented.

ATTACHMENT #1
City of Bradbury
Bradbury, California
Independent Auditors' Reports and
Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
THE

PUN GROUP

ACCOUNTANTS & ADVISORS

City of Bradbury
Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Table of Contents
Page
Independent Auditors' Reports:

Report on the Financial Statements. ... 1
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards ..... 5
Basic Financial Statements:

Government-Wide Financial Statements:

Statement of Net Position
Statement of Activities..

Governmental Fund Financial Statements:

Balance Sheet.. ... 14
Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet
to the Government-Wide Statement of Net Position .. 17
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances... 18 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances to the Government-Wide .. 20
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements.. • 23
Required Supplementary Information (Unaudited):

Budgetary Comparison Schedules:

General Fund .. 47
Utility Users Tax (UUT) Special Revenue Fund 48
Citizens' Option for Public Safety (COPS) Special Revenue Fund 49 Public Transportation Fund (Prop A) Special Revenue Fund 50 Budgetary Information. 51
Schedule of the City's Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios Schedule of the City's Contributions - Pensions.... 54
City of Bradbury
Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Table of Contents (Continued)
Supplementary Information:

Nonmajor Governmental Funds:

Combining Balance Sheet 60
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and
Changes in Fund Balances. 64
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actua County Park Grant Special Fund 68
Measure R Special Revenue Fund 69
STPL Special Revenue Fund. 70
Recycling Grant Special Revenue Fund...

Fire Grant Special Revenue Fund.

Measure M Special Revenue Fund
TDA Special Revenue Fund
Gas Tax Special Revenue Fund
Proposition C Special Revenue Fund .

SB 1 Gas Tax Special Revenue Fund
Measure W Special Revenue Fund
Sewer Special Revenue Fund
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs 81
THE

PUN GROUP

ACCOUNTANTS & ADVISORS
www.pungroup.cpa

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
of the City of Bradbury
Bradbury, California
Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements
Opinions
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Bradbury, California (the "City"), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2022, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of June 30, 2022, and the respective changes in financial position for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinions
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditors' Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are required to be independent of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.

Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the City's ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the financial statement date, including any currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter.

ORANGE COUNTY • SAN DIEGO • SACRAMENTO • WALNUT CREEK • LAS VEGAS • PHoeNIx| ••• To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
of the City of Bradbury
Bradbury, California

Page 2 ends

Auditors' Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinions.

Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statements.

In performing an audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, • Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. • Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. • Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed. • Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements. • Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the City's ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.

We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control-related matters that we identified during the audit.

Required Supplementary Information
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the Budgetary Comparison Schedules, the Schedules of the City's Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liabilities and Related Ratios, and the Schedule of the City's Contributions - Pensions on pages 47 through 55 be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the Required Supplementary Information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. 2 To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council of the City of Bradbury
Bradbury, California

Page 3 ends

Management has omitted the Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") that accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America required to be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such missing information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. Our opinion on the basic financial statements is not affected by this missing information.

Supplementary Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements. The Combining and Individual Nonmajor Fund Financial Statements are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. The Combining and Individual Nonmajor Fund Financial Statements are the responsibility of management and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the Combining and Individual Nonmajor Fund Financial Statements are fairly stated in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.

Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated August 21, 2023, on our consideration of the City's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City's internal control over financial reporting and compliance.

The hurt Group, up
Santa Ana, California
August 21, 2023
3 This page intentionally left blank.

THE

PUN GROUP

ACCOUNTANTS & ADVISORS
200 E. Sandpa An, Cal 54392700
www.pungroup.cpa

REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND

OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN

ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
Independent Auditors' Report
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
of the City of Bradbury
Bradbury, California
We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Bradbury, California (the "City"), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2022, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated August 21, 2023.

Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City's internal control over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control.

A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the City's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.

Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies and therefore, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may exist that were not identified. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. We identified certain deficiencies in internal control, described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs as item 2022-001 that we consider to be a significant deficiency.

ORANGE COUNTY • SAN DIEGO • SACRAMENTO • WALNUT CREEK • LAS VEGAS • PHOENIX in To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
of the City of Bradbury
Bradbury, California

Page 2 ends

Report on Compliance and Other Matters
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City's financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards.

City's Reponses to Findings
Government Auditing Standards requires the auditor to perform limited procedures on the City's response to the findings identified in our audit and described in the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs. The City's response was not subjected to the other auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, accordingly, we express no opinion on the response.

Purpose of this Report
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City's internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other The Ruel Group, Up
Santa Ana, California
August 21, 2023

BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
This page intentionally left blank.

GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
This page intentionally left blank.
10 City of Bradbury
Statement of Net Position
June 30, 2022
Governmental
Activities
ASSETS
Current assets:

Cash and investments
$ 5,422,324
Accounts receivable
Taxes receivable 6,966
188,013
Prepaid items 179
Total current assets
5,617,482
Noncurrent assets:

Net pension asset 32,129
Capital assets:

Nondepreciable
198,323
Depreciable, net 3,376,734
Total capital assets
3,575,057
Total noncurrent assets 3,607,186
Total assets
9,224,668

DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES
Pension related deferred outflows of resources
97,747
Total deferred outflows of resources
97,747

LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 117,317
Unearned revenue
300,572
Total current liabilities
417,889
Total liabilities 417,889

DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
Pension related deferred inflows of resources
41,007
Total deferred inflows of resources 41,007

NET POSITION
Investment in capital assets 3,575,057
Restricted
Unrestricted 312,467
Total net position 4,975,995
$ 8,863,519
See accompanying Notes to the Basic Financial Statements. 11 City of Bradbury
Statement of Activities
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
- Program Revenues Net (Expense)
Operating Capital Revenue and
Charges for Grants and Grants and Change in
Functions/Programs Expenses Services Contributions Contributions Net Position Governmental activities:

General government $ 723,526 426,308 $ 3,653 - $ (293,565) Public safety 235,307 263,106 27,799
Public works 155,189 53,094 162,936 60,849
Parks and recreation 43,311
- (43,311)
Total governmental activities $ 1,157,333 479,402 $ 429,695 $ 8 (248,228) General Revenues:

Property taxes 539,153
Sales taxes 2,832
Franchise taxes 126,129
Motor vehicle in lieu 146,411
Busines license 26,301
Use of money and property (27,804)
Miscellaneous 12,759
Total general revenues 825,781
Change in net position 577,553
let Position
beginning of year, as restated (Note 12 8,285,966
End of year $ 8,863,519
See accompanying Notes to the Basic Financial Statements. 12 GOVERNMENTAL FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
13 City of Bradbury
Balance Sheet
Governmental Funds
June 30, 2022
- Major Funds
Special Revenue Funds
Public
General Transportation
- Fund Utility Users Tax COPS Fund (Prop A)
ASSETS
Cash and investments $ 4,178,342 $ 590,323 $ 352,399 28,054 Accounts receivable 6,966
Taxes receivable 187,600 :

Prepaid items 179 :

Due from other funds 5,860
Total assets 4,378,947 590,323 $ 352,399 $ 28,054

LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS

OF RESOURCES AND FUND BALANCES
Liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ 81,717 $ $ $ Unearned revenues 294,909 :

Due to other funds
Total liabilities 81,717 294,909
Deferred Inflows of Resources:

Unavailable revenue 134,949
Total deferred inflows of resources 134,949
Fund Balances:

Nonspendable 179
Restricted 1,032 57,490 28,054
Committed 590,323
Assigned 1,000,000 : :

Unassigned 3,161,070
-
Total fund balances 4,162,281 590,323 57,490
28,054
Total liabilities, deferred inflows 4,378,947 $ 590,323 $ 352,399 $ of resources and fund balances 28,054
See accompanying Notes to the Basic Financial Statements. 14 City of Bradbury
Balance Sheet (Continued)
Governmental Funds
June 30, 2022
Nonmajor Total
Governmental Governmental
Funds Funds
ASSETS
Cash and investments $ 273,206 $ 5,422,324
Accounts receivable 6,966
Taxes receivable 413 188,013
Prepaid items 179
Due from other funds 5,860
Total assets $ 273,619 $ 5,623,342

LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS

OF RESOURCES AND FUND BALANCES
Liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 35,600 $ 117,317 Unearned revenues 5,663 300,572
Due to other funds 5,860 5,860
Total liabilities 47,123 423,749
Deferred Inflows of Resources:

Unavailable revenue 134,949
Total deferred inflows of resources 134,949
Fund Balances:

Nonspendable 179
Restricted 225,891 312,467
Committed 605 590,928
Assigned 1,000,000
Unassigned : 3,161,070
Total fund balances 226,496 5,064,644
Total liabilities, deferred inflows $ 273,619 $ 5,623,342 of resources and fund balances
See accompanying Notes to the Basic Financial Statements.

This page intentionally left blank.
16 City of Bradbury
Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet
to the Government-Wide Statement of Net Position
June 30, 2022
Total Fund Balances - Total Governmental Funds 5,064,644 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the government-wide statement of net position were different because:

Capital nese used in governmental activities were not financial resources and therefore, were not reported in Capil ase, no daciated depreciation $ 198,323
3,376,734 3,575,057
Net pension liabilities and the related deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources are not due and payable in the current period or not available for current expenditures and are not reported in the governmental Pension related deferred outflows of resources 97,747
Net pension liability (asset) 32,129
Pension related deferred inflows of resources (41,007)
Revenue reported as unavailable revenue in the governmental funds when it is not received soon enough after year- end for current expenditures. The availability criteria does not apply to the Government-Wide Financial Statements and, therefore, the revenue is recognized when eligibility requirements are met and earned. 134,949 Net Position of Governmental Activities $ 8,863,519
See accompanying Notes to the Basic Financial Statements. 17 City of Bradbury
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Governmental Funds
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
- Major Funds
Special Revenue Funds
Public
General Transportation
Fund Utility Users Tax COPS
Fund (Prop A)
REVENUES:

Taxes $ 818,178 $
Licenses and permits $
161,372 : :

Use of money and property (31,219) 2,742
Intergovernmental 62
141,183 102,117 26,566
Charges for services 290,891
Other revenue 17,926
Total revenues = 1,398,331
4,446 104,859 26,628
EXPENDITURES:

Current:

General government 885,087
Public safety 133,190 102,117
Public works
Parks and recreation 43,311 :

Capital outlay
-
Totall expenditures 1,061,588 16,128
102,117
REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 336,743 (11,682) 2,742 26,628
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES):

Transfers in 667,520
Transfers out
Total other financing sources (uses) 667,520
Net change in fund balances 1,004,263 (11,682) 2,742
26,628
FUND BALANCES:

Beginning of year, as restated (Note 12) 3,158.018
End of year - 602,005 54,748 1,426
4,162,281 $ 590,323 57,490 $ 28,054
See accompanying Notes to the Basic Financial Statements.

City of Bradbury
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances (Continued) Governmental Funds
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Nonmajor Total
Governmental Governmental
Funds Funds
REVENUES:

Taxes $ 818,178
Licenses and permits 161,372
Use of money and property (20,088)
Intergovernmental 181,458 451,324
Charges for services 20,103 310,994
Other revenue 17,926
Total revenues 205,442 1.739,706
EXPENDITURES:

Current:

General government 885,087
Public safety 235,307
Public works 83,425 103,553
Parks and recreation 43,311
Capital outlay 81,126 81,126
Total expenditures 168,551 1,348,384
REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 36,891 391,322
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES):

Transfers in 667,520
Transfers out (667,520) (667,520)
Total other financing sources (uses) (667,520)
Net change in fund balances (630,629) 391,322
FUND BALANCES:

Beginning of year, as restated (Note 12) 857,125 4,673,322 End of year $ 226,496 5,064.644
See accompanying Notes to the Basic Financial Statements. 19 City of Bradbury
Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances to the Government-Wide Statement of Activities For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Net Change in Fund Balances - Total Governmental Funds: 391,322 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of activities are different because:

Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and therefore are not reported in governmental funds:

Capital outlay $ 81,126
Depreciation (72,645) 8,481
Certain pension expenses reported in the Statement of Activities do not require the use of current financial resources and, therefore, are not reported as expenditures in governmental funds, net of contribution made after measurement date in the amount of $30,103
182,570
Revenues reported as unavailable revenue in the governmental funds and recognized as revenue in the Statement of Activities.
(4,820)
Change in Net Position of Governmental Activities $ 577,553 See accompanying Notes to the Basic Financial Statements. 20 NOTES TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
21 This page intentionally left blank.
22 City of Bradbury
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 1 - Reporting Entity
The City of Bradbury, California (the "City"), was incorporated on July 26, 1957. The City provides a broad range of services to its citizens, including general government, public safety, streets, sanitation, and parks and recreation.

Many of the municipal governmental functions of the City are provided by special districts. Examples of some of these special districts, which usually encompass areas larger than the City itself, are the Fire Protection District, the Library District, the Sewer Maintenance District and the County Flood Control District. Certain other governmental functions are paid for by the City, but performed by Los Angeles County departments under contract. Some of the contracts now in effect are for police protection, street maintenance, and tax collection services.

The City is a general law city operating under the City Council/City Manager form of government. The financial reporting entity of the City is comprised of various funds. The accompanying financial statements include those of the City and contain only the funds of the City.

In evaluating how to define the City for financial reporting purposes, management has considered all potential component units. The primary criteria for including a potential component unit within the reporting entity are the governing body's financial accountability and a financial benefit or burden relationship and whether it is misleading to exclude. A primary government is financially accountable and shares a financial benefit or burden relationship, if it appoints a voting majority of an organization's governing body and it is able to impose its will on the organization, or if there is a potential for the organization to provide specific financial benefits to, or impose specific financial burdens on the primary government. A primary government may also be financially accountable if an organization is fiscally dependent on the primary government regardless of whether the organization has a separately elected governing board, a governing board appointed by a higher level of government, or a jointly appointed board, and there is a potential for the organization to provide specific financial benefits to, or impose specific financial burdens on the primary government.

There are no component units for the City that meet the criteria for blended or discrete presentation.

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
A. Basis of Presentation
The basic financial statements of the City have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP") as applied to governmental agencies. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board ("GASB") is the accepted standard setting body for establishing governmental accounting and financial reporting principles.

B. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statements Presentation The accounts of the City are organized on the basis of funds, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity. The operations of each fund are accounted for in a separate set of self-balancing accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues, and expenditures. City resources are allocated to account for in individual funds based upon the purpose for which they are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled.

Government-Wide Financial Statements
The City's government-wide financial statements include a statement of net position and a statement of activities.

These statements present summaries of governmental activities for the City. The City does not have any business- type activities; therefore, only governmental activities are reported. 23 City of Bradbury
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) B. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statements Presentation (Continued) Government-Wide Financial Statements (Continued)
The government-wide financial statements are presented on an "economic resources" measurement focus and the ccrual basis of accounting. Accordingly, all of the City's assets and liabilities are included in the accompanyin tatement of net position. The statement of activities presents changes in net position. Under the accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized in the period in which they are earned, while expenses are recognized in the period in which the liability is incurred
Certain types of transactions are reported as program revenues for the City in three categories: (1) charges for services, (2) operating grants and contributions, and (3) capital grants and contributions.

Certain eliminations have been made in regards to interfund activities, payables, and receivables. The transfers in and out, and due to and due from other funds activities have been eliminated.

Governmental Fund Financial Statements
Governmental fund financial statements include a balance sheet and a statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances for all major governmental funds and nonmajor funds in aggregate. An accompanying schedule is presented to reconcile and explain the differences in net position as presented in these statements to the net position presented in the government-wide financial statements. The City has presented all major funds that met the qualifications for major fund reporting.

All governmental funds are accounted for on a spending or "current financial resources" measurement focus and the moditied accrual basis of accounting. Accordingly, only current assets and current liabilities are included on the balance sheets. The statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balance presents increases (revenues and other financing sources) and decreases (expenditures and other financing uses) in net current assets.

Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized in the accounting period in which they become both measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period.

Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both "measurable" and "available". Revenues are considered to be available when they are collectible within the current period as soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the City considers revenues to be available if they are collected within 60 days of the end of the current fiscal period. The primary revenue sources, which have been treated as susceptible to accrual by the City, are property taxes, sales tax, intergovernmental revenues, other taxes, and grant revenues Expenditures are recorded in the accounting period in which the related fund liability is incurred.

The reconciliations of the Fund Financial Statements to the Government-Wide Financial Statements are presented to explain the differences.

The City reports the following major governmental funds:

General Fund is the general operating fund of the City. All general tax revenues and other receipts not allocated by law or contractual agreement to other funds are accounted for in this fund. Expenditures of this fund include general operating costs not paid through other funds. The General Fund is used to account for all activities of the City not accounted for in some other fund. 24 City of Bradbury
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) B. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statements Presentation (Continued) Governmental Fund Financial Statements (Continued)
Utility Users Tax Special Revenue Fund is used to record the receipt and disbursement of funds received from the utility users tax assessed by the City. When it was approved by voters, it was specified to be separated into its own fund for the purpose of complying with the Clean Water Act. The fund is used to preserve the City's essential municipal services, maintain a safe and quality community and meet the obligations for State and Federal Mandates.

Citizens' Option for Public Safety ("COPS") Special Revenue Fund - is used to account for the receipt and disbursement of funds allocated by the State of California and must be used for front line law enforcement expenditures.

Public Transportation (Prop A) Special Revenue Fund - is used to account for the receipt and disbursement of funds received from the motor vehicle registration fee collected by the State of California and must be used for programs that reduce motor vehicle emissions. The City has used these funds for the purchase of alternative fuel vehicles and for enhancements to the City's website.

C. Cash and Investments
Investments are reported at fair value.

Changes in fair value that occur during a fiscal year are recognized as investment income reported for that fiscal year. Investment income includes interest earnings, changes in fair value, and any gains or losses realized upon the liquidation, maturity, or sale of investments.

The City pools cash investments of all funds. Each fund's share in this pool is displayed in the accompanying financial statements as cash and investments. Investment income earned from pooled investments is allocated to those various funds based on each fund's average cash and investment balance.

Certain disclosure requirements, if applicable, for deposits and investment risks in the following areas:
> Interest Rate Risk
Credit Risk
• Overall
• Custodial Credit Risk
• Concentration of Credit Risk
• Foreign Currency Risk
In addition, other disclosures are specified including use of certain methods to present deposits and investments, highly sensitive investments, credit quality at year-end and other disclosures.

City of Bradbury
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) D. Fair Value Measurement
U.S. GAAP defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and establishes disclosures about fair value measurement. Investments, unless otherwise specified, recorded at fair value in the financial statements, are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value.

Levels of inputs are as follows:

The three levels of the fair value measurement hierarchy are described below:
• Level 1 - Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets at the measurement date.
> Level 2 - Inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the assets and liabilities through corroboration with market data at the measurement date. > Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that reflect management's best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the assets and liabilities at the measurement date.

E. Receivables
Receivables include such items as taxes, intergovernmental revenues, charges for services, miscellaneous accounts receivable, and interest receivable. No allowance for doubtful accounts has been established, as the City believes all amounts are considered to be collectible in the normal course of business.

F. Capital Assets
Capital assets are valued at historical cost or estimated historical cost if actual historical cost was not available.

The City's capitalization policy is $5,000 and above for machinery and equipment; $10,000 and above for building improvements; $20,000 and above for buildings; and $50,000 and above for infrastructure assets. Capital assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives as follows:

Structures and improvements 50 Years
Machinery and Equipment 7-10 Years
Infrastructure:

Roadways - Pavement 25 Years
Roadways - Signs 10 Years
Sewer - Existing Pipe 75 Years
Fence 50 Years
Curbs and Gutters 100 Years
Bridge 75 Years
G. Interfund Activity
Activity between funds that are representative of lending/borrowing arrangements outstanding at the end of the fiscal year are referred to as either "due to/from other funds" (i.e., the current portion of interfund loans) or "advances to/from other funds" (i.e., the non-current portion of interfund loans).

H. Compensated Absences
The City accrues accumulated unpaid vacation and sick leave and associated employee-related costs when earned (or estimated to be earned) by the employee. All full-time employees accrue vacation leave according to their years of service. Unused sick days are forfeited at termination or resignation; therefore, there is no liability for sick leave at June 30, 2022.
26 City of Bradbury
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) I. Pensions
The City contributes to the California Public Employees' Retirement System ("CalPERS"), a cost-sharing multiple- employer defined benefit pension plan. For purposes of measuring the net pension liability, deferred outflows o resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions, and pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the plans and additions to/deductions from the plans' fiduciary net position have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by the plans. For this purpose, benefit payments (including refunds of employee contributions) are recognized when due and payable in accordance with benefit terms. Investments are reported at fair value.

The following timeframes are used for pension reporting:

Valuation Date June 30, 2020
Measurement Date June 30, 2021
Measurement Period July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021
Gains and losses related to changes in total pension liability and fiduciary net position are recognized in pension expense systematically over time. The first amortized amounts are recognized in pension expense for the year the gain or loss occurs. The remaining amounts are categorized as deferred outflows and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions and are to be recognized in future pension expense. The amortization period differs depending on the source of the gain or loss. The difference between projected and actual earnings is amortized straight-line over 5 years. All other amounts are amortized straight-line over the average expected remaining service lives of all members that are provided with benefits (active, inactive, and retired) as of the beginning of the measurement period.

J. Deferred Outflows / Inflows of Resources
The statement of net position and the balance sheet - governmental funds reports separate sections for Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources, when applicable.

Deferred Outflows of Resources represent outflows of resources (consumption of net position) that apply to future periods and that, therefore, will not be recognized as an expense until that time.

Deferred Inflows of Resources represent inflows of resources (acquisition of net position/fund balances) that apply to future periods and that, therefore, are not recognized as a revenue until that time.

K. Fund Balances
In the governmental fund financial statements, fund balances are classified as follows:

Nonspendable - This amount indicates the portion of fund balance which cannot be spent because they are either not in spendable form, such as prepaid items, inventories or loans receivable, or legally or contractually required to be maintained intact, such as the principal portion of an endowment.

Restricted - This amount indicates the portion of fund balance which has been restricted a) externally imposed by creditors (such as through debt covenants), grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other governments; or b) imposed by law through constitutional provisions or enabling legislation.

Committed - This amount indicates the portion of fund balance which can only be used for specific purposes pursuant to formal resolution or ordinance of the City Council. The City Council is considered the highest authority for the City. Adoption of a resolution by the City Council is required to commit resources or to rescind the commitment.
27 City of Bradbury
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) K. Fund Balances (Continued)
Assigned - This amount indicates the portion of fund balance which is constrained by the City's intent to be used for specific purposes, but is neither restricted nor committed. The City Manager is authorized by the City Council to determine and define the amount of assigned fund balance.

Unassigned - This amount indicates the portion of fund balance that does not fall into one of the above ategories. This category is for any balances that have no restrictions placed upon them. The general fund i he only fund that reports a positive unassigned fund balance amount. In other governmental funds it is not appropriate to report a positive unassigned fund balance amount. However, in governmental funds other than the general fund, if expenditures incurred for specific purposes exceed the amounts that are restricted, committed, or assigned to those purposes, it may be necessary to report a negative unassigned fund balance in When expenditures are incurred for purposes where only unrestricted fund balances are available, the City uses the unrestricted resources in the following order: committed, assigned, and unassigned.

L. Net Position
In the government-wide financial statements, net position balances are classified as follows:

Investment in Capital Assets - This component of net position consists of capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation.

Restricted - This component of net position consists of restricted assets reduced by liabilities related to those assets.

Unrestricted - This component of net position is the amount of the assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources that are not included in the determination of investment in capital assets or the restricted component of net position.

When expenses are incurred for purposes in which both restricted and unrestricted components of net position are available, the City's policy is to apply the restricted component of net position first.

M. Property Tax Revenues
Property taxes in California are levied in accordance with Article XIIIB of the State Constitution at one percent of The following dates relate to property tax levies and collections:

Lien Date January 1
Levy Date July 1
Due Dates November 1 and February 1
Collection Dates December 10 and April 10
City of Bradbury
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) N. Use of Estimates
The preparation of the basic financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

O. Implementation of New GASB Pronouncements
During fiscal year ended June 30, 2022, the City has implemented the following new GASB Pronouncement:

GASB Statement No. 87 - In June 2017, GASB issued Statement No. 87, Leases (GASB Statement No. 87), to better meet the information needs of financial statement users by improving accounting and financial reporting for ieases by governments. inis statement increases the usefuiness of governments' financial statements by requiring recognition of certain lease assets and liabilities for leases that previously were classified as operating leases and recognized as inflows of resources or outflows of resources based on the payment provisions of the contract. It also establishes a single model for lease accounting based on the foundational principle that leases are financings of the right to use an underlying asset. Implementation of this Statement did not have a significant effect on the City's financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022.

GASB Statement No. 89 - In June 2018, GASB issued Statement No. 89, Accounting for Interest Cost Incurred before the End of a Construction Period. This Statement establishes accounting requirements for interest cost incurred before the end of a construction period. Such interest cost includes all interest that previously was accounted for in accordance with the requirements of paragraphs 5-22 of Statement No. 62, Codification of Accounting and Financial Reporting Guidance Contained in Pre-November 30, 1989 FASB and AICPA Pronouncements, which are superseded by this Statement. This Statement requires that interest cost incurred before the end of a construction period be recognized as an expense in the period in which the cost is incurred for financial statements prepared using the economic resources measurement focus. As a result, interest cost incurred before the end of a construction period will not be included in the historical cost of a capital asset reported in a business-type activity or enterprise fund. Implementation of this Statement did not have a significant effect on the City's financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022.

GASB Statement No. 92 - In January 2020, GASB issued Statement No. 92, Omnibus 2020. The primary objectives of this Statement are to enhance comparability in accounting and financial reporting and to improve consistency of authoritative literature by addressing practice issues that have been identified during implementation and application of certain GASB Statements. Implementation of this Statement did not have a significant effect on the City's financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022.

GASB Statement No. 93 - In March 2020, GASB issued Statement No. 93, Replacement of Interbank Offered Rates. Some governments have entered into agreements in which variable payments made or received depend on an interbank offered rate (IBOR)-most notably, the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). As a result of global reference rate reform, LIBOR is expected to cease to exist in its current form at the end of 2021, prompting governments to amend or replace financial instruments for the purpose of replacing LIBOR with other reference rates, by either changing the reference rate or adding or changing fallback provisions related to the reference rate.

The objective of this Statement is to address those and other accounting and financial reporting implications that result from the replacement of an IBOR. Implementation of this Statement did not have a significant effect on the City's financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. 29 City of Bradbury
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) O. Implementation of New GASB Pronouncements (Continued) GASB Statement No. 97 - In June 2020, GASB issued Statement No. 97, Certain Component Unit Criteria, and Accounting and Financial Reporting for Internal Revenue Code Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plans - An Amendment of GASB Statements No. 14 and No. 84, and a Supersession of GASB Statement No. 32. The primary objectives of this Statement are to (1) increase consistency and comparability related to the reporting of fiduciary component units in circumstances in which a potential component unit does not have a governing board and the primary government performs the duties that a governing board typically would perform; (2) mitigate costs associated with the reporting of certain defined contribution pension plans, defined contribution other (other employee benefit plans) as fiduciary component units in fiduciary fund financial statements; and (3) enhance the relevance, consistency, and comparability of the accounting and financial reporting for Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 457 deferred compensation plans (Section 457 plans) that meet the definition of pension plan and for benefits provided through those plans. Implementation of this Statement did not have a Note 3 - Cash and Investments
Cash and investments as of June 30, 2022 consisted of the following:

Petty cash $ 300
Demand deposits 1,355,945
Investments with LAIF 3,322,079
Investments in certificates of deposit 744,000
Total $ 5,422,324
A. Deposits
The carrying amount of the City's demand deposits was $1,355,945 at June 30, 2022. The bank balances at that date were $1,409,950, the total amount of which was collateralized or insured with accounts held by the pledging financial institutions in the City's name as discussed below.

The California Government Code requires California banks and savings and loan associations to secure the City's cash deposits by pledging securities as collateral. This Code states that collateral pledged in this manner shall have the effect of perfecting a security interest in such collateral superior to those of a general creditor. Thus, collateral for cash deposits is considered to be held in the City's name.

The market value of pledged securities must equal at least 110% of the City's cash deposits. California law also allows institutions to secure City's deposits by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes having a value of 150% of the City's total cash deposits. The City may waive collateral requirements for cash deposits, which are fully insured up to $250,000 by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"'). The City, however, has not waived the collateralization requirements.

The City follows the practice of pooling cash and investments of all funds, except for funds required to be held by fiscal agents under the provisions of bond indentures, if applicable. Interest income earned on pooled cash and investments is allocated on an accounting period basis to the various funds based on the period-end cash and investment balances.
30 City of Bradbury
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 3 - Cash and Investments (Continued)
B. Investments
Under the provisions of the City's investment policy and in accordance with Section 53601 of the California Government Code, the City may invest in the type of investments listed in the table below. The table also identifies certain provisions intended to limit the City's exposure to interest rate risk, credit risk, and concentration of credit risk.

Maximum Maximum
Maximum Percentage Investment
Authorized Investment Type Maturity of Portfolio in One Issuer i Local Agency Investment Fund N/A No Limit $ 40,000,000
U.S. Government Obligations 5 Years No Limit No Limit
Certificates of Deposit 360 Days No Limit No Limit
C. Fair Value Measurement
At June 30, 2022, investments are reported at fair value. The following table presents the fair value measurement of investments on recurring basis and the levels within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at June 30, 2022:

Investment Type
Local Agency Investment Fund $ $ 3,322,079 (2)
Negotiable certificates of deposit 744,000 ("
Total $ 744,000 $ 3,322,079
(1) Price based on market prices from Intercontinental Exchange. (2) Cash and cash equivalent valued at amortized cost.

D. Risk Disclosures
Interest Rate Risk - As a means of limiting its exposure to fair value losses arising from rising interest rates, the City's investment policy limits investments to a maximum maturity of five years.

At June 30, 2022, the City had the following investment maturities:

Investment Type Amount Less than 1 Investment Maturies (in Year) 2103 Local Agency Investment Fund $ 3,322,079 3,322,079
Negotiable certificates of deposit 247,000
Total 3 406000 33000 00000
31 City of Bradbury
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 3 - Cash and Investments (Continued)
D. Risk Disclosures (Continued)
Credit Risk - State law limits investments in commercial paper and corporate bonds to the top two ratings issued by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. It is the City's policy to limit its investments in these investment types to the top rating issued by Standard & Poor's and Moody's Investor Service. At June 30, 2022, the City's credit risks, expressed on a percentage basis, were as follows:

Credit Quality Distribution for Securities
with Credit Exposure as a Percentage of Total Investments Moody's S&P's % of Investments
Credit Credit with Interest
Investment Type Rating Rating Rate Risk
Local Agency Investment Fund Not Rated Not Rated 81.70% Negotiable certificates of deposit Not Rated Not Rated 18.30% Total 100.00%
Custodial Risk - For deposits, custodial credit risk is the risk that, in the event of the failure of a depository financial institution, the City will not be able to recover its deposits or will not be able to recover collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. For an investment, custodial credit risk is the risk that, in the event of the failure of the counterparty (e.g., broker-dealer), the City will not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party.

Concentration of credit risk - The City's investment policy does not allow for investments in any one institution that is in excess of 5% of the City's total portfolio, except for LAIF and certificate of deposit, where there is no limit. The City's certificate of deposit in the amount of $744,000 represented 18.3% of total City investments.

E. Investment in Local Agency Investment Fund ("LAIF")
The City is a participant in LAIF, which is regulated by California Government Code Section 16429 under the oversight of the Treasurer of the State of California. The City's investments with LAIF at June 30, 2022 included a portion of the pool funds invested in Structured Notes and Asset-Backed Securities, which included the following:

Structured Notes: debt securities (other than asset-backed securities) whose cash flow characteristics (coupon rate, redemption amount, or stated maturity) depend upon one or more indices and/or that have embedded forwards or options.

Asset-Backed Securities: generally, mortgage-backed securities that entitle their purchasers to receive a share of the cash flows from a pool of assets such as principal and interest repayments from a pool of mortgages (for example, Collateralized Mortgage Obligations) or credit card receivables.

As of June 30, 2022, the City had $3,332,079 invested in LAIF, which had invested 1.88% of the pool investment funds in Structured Notes and Asset-Backed Securities. The investment in LAIF is reported at amortized cost. 32 City of Bradbury
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 4 - Interfund Transactions
Due To and Due From
At June 30, 2022 the City had the following due to and from other funds:

Due From Other Funds
Due To Other Funds General Fund
Nonmajor Governmental Fund $ 5,860
The due to and due from is short-term borrowing to cover a cash deficit.

Transfers In and Out
During the year ended June 30, 2022 the City had the following transfers in and out from other funds:

Transfer Out
Sewer Speical
Revenue Fund
General Fund $ 667,520
Total $ 667,520
The purpose of the transfers was to transfer funds to cover budgeted projects. 33 City of Bradbury
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 5- Capital Assets
The following schedule shows changes in capital assets for the year ended June 30, 2022:

Balance Balance
July 1, 2021 Additions Deletions Reclassification _July 1, 2022 Nondepreciable Assets:

Land $ 117,197 $ - $ - $ 117,197
Construction in progress 719,477 81,126 (719,477) 81,126 Total Nondepreciable Assets 836,674 81,126 (719,477) 198,323 Depreciable Assets:

Structures and improvements 859,900 859,900
Machinery and equipment : : :
101,709 101,709
Infrastructure 2,981,552 719,477 3,701,029
Total Depreciable Assets 3,943,161 719,477 4,662,638
Less Accumulated Depreciation:

Structures and improvements (182,684) (17,198)
Machinery and equipment (79,161) (3,811) :
(951,414) (51,636)
Total Accumulated Depreciation (1,213,259) (72,645) (1,285,904) Total Depreciable Assets, Net 2,729,902 (72,645) 719,477 3,376,734 Total Capital Assets, Net $ 3.566.,576 $ 8,481 $ $ 3,575,057 Depreciation expense was charged in the following functions in the statement of activities:

General government $ 21,009
Public works 51,636
Total GA 72,645
Note 6 - Self-Insurance with Joint Powers Authority
A. Description of Self-Insurance Pool Pursuant to Joint Powers Agreement The City is a member of the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (the "Authority"). The Authority is composed of 124 California public entities and is organized under a joint powers agreement pursuant to California Government Code §6500 et seq. The purpose of the Authority is to arrange and administer programs for the pooling of self-insured losses, to purchase excess insurance or reinsurance, and to arrange for group purchased insurance for property and other lines of coverage. The California JPIA began covering claims of its members in 1978. Each member government has an elected official as its representative on the Board of Directors. The Board operates through a nine-member Executive Committee.

B. Primary Self-Insurance Programs of the Authority
Each member pays an annual contribution at the beginning of the coverage period. A retrospective adjustment is then conducted annually thereafter, for coverage years 2012-13 and prior. Coverage years 2013-14 and forward are not subject to routine annual retrospective adjustment. The total funding requirement for primary self- insurance programs is based on an actuarial analysis. Costs are allocated to individual agencies based on payroll and claims history, relative to other members of the risk-sharing pool. 34 City of Bradbury
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 6 - Self-Insurance with Joint Powers Authority (Continued) B. Primary Self-Insurance Programs of the Authority (Continued) Primary Liability Program
Claims are pooled separately between police and general government exposures. (1) The payroll of each member is evaluated relative to the payroll of other members. A variable credibility factor is determined for each member, which establishes the weight applied to payroll and the weight applied to losses within the formula. (2) The first layer of losses includes incurred costs up to $100,000 for each occurrence and is evaluated as a percentage of the pool's total incurred costs within the first layer. (3) The second layer of losses includes incurred costs from $100,000 to $500,000 for each occurrence and is evaluated as a percentage of the pool's total incurred costs within the second layer. (4) Incurred costs from $500,000 to $50 million, are distributed based on the outcome of cost allocation within the first and second loss layers.

The overall coverage limit for each member, including all layers of coverage, is $50 million per occurrence.

Subsidence losses also have a $50 million per occurrence limit. The coverage structure is composed of a combination of pooled self-insurance, reinsurance, and excess insurance. Additional information concerning the coverage structure is available on the Authority's website: https://cjpia.org/coverage/risk-sharing-pools/.

Primary Workers' Compensation Program
Claims are pooled separately between public safety (police and fire) and general government exposures. (1) The payroll of each member is evaluated relative to the payroll of other members. A variable credibility factor is determined for each member, which establishes the weight applied to payroll and the weight applied to losses within the formula. (2) The first layer of losses includes incurred costs up to $75,000 for each occurrence and is evaluated as a percentage of the pool's total incurred costs within the first layer. (3) The second layer of losses includes incurred costs from $75,000 to $200,000 for each occurrence and is evaluated as a percentage of the pool's total incurred costs within the second layer. (4) Incurred costs from $200,000 to statutory limits are distributed based on the outcome of cost allocation within the first and second loss layers.

For 2021-22 the Authority's pooled retention is $1 million per occurrence, with reinsurance to statutory limits under California Workers' Compensation Law. Employer's Liability losses are pooled among members to $1 million. Coverage from $1 million to $5 million is purchased through reinsurance policies, and Employer's Liability losses from $5 million to $10 million are pooled among members.

C. Purchased Insurance
Pollution Legal Liability Insurance
The City participates in the pollution legal liability insurance program which is available through the Authority.

The policy covers sudden and gradual pollution of scheduled property, streets, and storm drains owned by the City. Coverage is on a claims-made basis. There is a $250,000 deductible. The Authority has an aggregate limit of $20 million.

Property Insurance
The City participates in the all-risk property protection program of the Authority. This insurance protection is underwritten by several insurance companies. The City property is currently insured according to a schedule of covered property submitted by the City to the Authority. The City property currently has all-risk property insurance protection in the amount of $97,937,818. There is a $10,000 deductible per occurrence except for non- emergency vehicle insurance which has a $2,500 deductible. 35 City of Bradbury
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 6 - Self-Insurance with Joint Powers Authority (Continued) C. Purchased Insurance (Continued)
Crime Insurance
The City of Bradbury purchases crime insurance coverage in the amount of $3,000,000 with a $2,500 deductible.

The fidelity coverage is provided through the Authority.

D. Adequacy of Protection
During the past three fiscal years, none of the above programs of protection experienced settlements or judgments that exceeded pooled or insured coverage. There were also no significant reductions in pooled or insured liability coverage in 2021-2022.

Note 7 - Deferred Compensation Plan
The City had made available to its employees a deferred compensation plan, whereby employees authorize the City to withhold funds from salaries to be invested in individual investment accounts. Funds may be withdrawn by participants upon termination of employment or retirement. The City makes no contributions under the Plan. The amount held by trustees for the employees at June 30, 2022 was $37,114. The Trustee invests compensation deferred by employees in various investment options selected by the employee and retains title to all accumulated funds until they are paid to the employee or other beneficiary. Plan assets were established in the trust arrangement specified by Internal Revenue Code Section 457(g). The plan assets are not reflected on the City's financial statements.

Note 8 - Defined Benefit Pension Plans
General Information about the Pension Plan
Plan Description
The City contributes to the California Public Employees' Retirement System ("CalPERS"), a cost-sharing multiple- employer defined benefit pension plan. CaPERS provides retirement and disability benefits, annual cost-of-living adjustments, and death benefits to plan members and beneficiaries. CaPERS acts as a common investment and administrative agent for participating public entities within the State of California. Benefit provisions and all other requirements are established by State statute and City ordinance. Copies of the CaPERS annual financial report may be obtained from their website at www.calpers.ca.gov under Forms and Publications.

Employees Covered by Benefit Terms
At June 30, 2020, the valuation date, the following employees were covered by the benefit terms:

Miscellaneous
Classic PEPRA
Active employees
Transferred and terminated employees NO
Retired Employees and Beneficiaries 1
Total 9
City of Bradbury
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 8 - Defined Benefit Pension Plans (Continued)
General Information about the Pension Plan (Continued)
Benefit Provided
CaPERS provide retirement and disability benefits, annual cost-of-living adjustments, and death benefits to plan members and beneficiaries. A classic CaPERS member becomes eligible for Service Retirement upon attainment of age 60 with at least 5 years of credited service. PEPRA miscellaneous members become eligible for service retirement upon attainment of age 62 with at least 5 years of service. The service retirement benefit is a monthly allowance equal to the product of the benefit factor, years of service, and final compensation. The final compensation is the monthly iverage of the member's highest 36 full-time equivalent monthly pay. Retirement benefits for miscellaneou mployees are calculated as 2.0% of the average final 60-month compensation Participant is eligible for non-industrial disability retirement if becomes disabled and has at least 5 years of credited service. There is no special age requirement. The standard non-industrial disability retirement benefit is a monthly allowance equal to 1.8 percent of final compensation, multiplied by service. Industrial disability benefits are not offered to miscellaneous employees.

An employee's beneficiary may receive the basic death benefit if the employee dies while actively employed. The employee must be actively employed with the City to be eligible for this benefit. An employee's survivor who is eligible for any other pre-retirement death benefit may choose to receive that death benefit instead of this basic death benefit. The basic death benefit is a lump sum in the amount of the employee's accumulated contributions, where interest is currently credited at 7.5 percent per year, plus a lump sum in the amount of one month's salary for each completed year of current service, up to a maximum of six months' salary. For purposes of this benefit, one month's salary is defined as the member's average monthly full-time rate of compensation during the 12 months preceding death.

Upon the death of a retiree, a one-time lump sum payment of $500 will be made to the retiree's designated survivors), or to the retiree's estate.

Benefit terms provide for annual cost-of-living adjustments to each employee's retirement allowance. Beginning the second calendar year after the year of retirement, retirement and survivor allowances will be annually adjusted on a compound basis by 2 percent.

Contributions
Section 20814(c) of the California Public Employees' Retirement Law ("PERL") requires that the employer contribution rates for all public employers be determined on an annual basis by the actuary and shall be effective on the July 1 following notice of a change in the rate. The total plan contributions are determined through CaPERS annual actuarial valuation process. The Public agency cost-sharing plans covered by either the Safety risk pools, the Plan's actuarially determined rate is based on the estimated amount necessary to pay the Plan's allocated share of the risk pool's costs of benefits earned by employees during the year, and any unfunded accrued liability. The employer is required to contribute the difference between the actuarially determined rate and the contribution rate of employees.

For the measurement period ended June 30, 2021, the active employee and employer's contribution rates for classic miscellaneous plan were 7.000% and 8.794%, respectively; and for PEPRA miscellaneous plan were 6.75% and

7.732% of annual payroll, respectively.
37 City of Bradbury
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 8 - Defined Benefit Pension Plans (Continued)
Pension Liabilities (Assets), Pension Expenses, and Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pension
Actuarial Methods and Assumptions Used to Determine Total Pension Liability The June 30, 2020 were rolled forward to determine the June 30, 2021 total pension liabilities, based on the following actuarial methods and assumptions:

Actuarial Cost Method Entry Age Normal
Actuarial Assumptions:

Discount Rate 7.15%
Inflation 2.50%
Salary Increases Varies by Entry Age and Service
Mortality Rate Table Derived using CalPERS' Membership Data for all Funds.

Post Retirement Benefit Increase The lesser of contract COLA or 2.50% until Purchasing Power Protection Allowance floor on purchasing power applies, 2.50% thereafter.
'The mortality table used was developed based on CalPERS-specific data. The probabilities of mortality are based on the 2017 CalPERS Experience Study for the period from 1997 to 2015. Pre- retirement and Post-retirement mortality rates include 15 years of projected mortality improvement using 90% of Scale MP-2016 published by the Society of Actuaries. For more details on this table, please refer to the CaPERS Experience Study and Review of Actuarial Assumptions report rom December 2017 that can be found on the CaPERS website Long-Term Expected Rate of Return
The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a building -block method in which expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of pension plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class.

In determining the long-term expected rate of return, CaPERS took into account both short-term and long-term market return expectations as well as the expected pension fund cash flows. Using historical returns of all of the funds' asset classes, expected compound (geometric) returns were calculated over the short-term (first 10 years) and the long-term (11+ years) using a building-block approach. Using the expected nominal returns for both short-term and long-term, the present value of benefits was calculated for each fund. The expected rate of return was set by calculating the rounded single equivalent expected return that arrived at the same present value of benefits for cash flows as the one calculated using both short-term and long-term returns. The expected rate of return was then set equal to the single equivalent rate calculated above and adjusted to account for assumed administrative expenses. The expected real rates of return by asset class are as follows:

The expected real rates of return by asset class are as followed:

Assumed
Asset Real Return Real Return
Asset Class' Allocation Years 1-102 Years 11+3
Global Equity 50.00% 4.80% 5.98%
Fixed Income 28.00% 1.00% 2.62%
Inflation Assets 0.00% 0.77% 1.81%
Private Equity 8.00% 6.30% 7.23%
Real Assets 13.00% 3.75% 4.93%
Liquidity 1.00% 0.00% -0.92%
100.00%
) In the System's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, Fixed Income is included in Global Debt Securities; Liquidity is included in Short-te vestments; Inflation Assets are included in both Global Equity Securities and Global Debt Securiti (3) An expected intion 20% us for this prod.
38 City of Bradbury
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 8 - Defined Benefit Pension Plans (Continued)
Pension Liabilities (Asset), Pension Expenses, and Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pension (Continued)
Discount Rate
The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 7.15%. The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that contributions from plan members will be made at the current member contribution rates and that contributions from employers will be made at statutorily required rates, actuarially determined. Based on those assumptions, the Plan's fiduciary net position was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current plan members. Therefore, the long-term expected rate of return on plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total pension liability.

Sensitivity of the City's Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability (Asset) to Changes in the Discount Rate The following presents the City's proportionate share of the net pension liabilities of the Plan as of the measurement date at June 30, 2021, calculated using the discount rate of 7.15%, as well as what the District's proportionate share of the net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1 percentage-point lower (6.15%) or 1 percentage-point higher (8.15%) than the current rate:

Plan's Net Pension Liability/(Asset)
Discount Rate Current Discount Discount Rate
-1% (6.15%) Rate (7.15%) + 1% (8.15%)
Miscellaneous $ (76,731) $ (32,129) 4,743
Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position
Detail information about the plan's fiduciary net position is available in the separately issued CaPERS financial report and can be obtained from CaPERS' website under Forms and Publications.

Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability (Asset) and Pension Expense The following table shows the plan's proportionate share of the risk pool collective net pension liability over the measurement period:

Increase (Decrease)
Plan Total Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Plan Net Pension
Liability Position Liability/(Asset)
Miscellaneous
Balance at: 6/30/20 (Valuation date) $ 1,173,067 $ 1,054,159 $ 118,908 Balance at: 6/30/21 (Measurement date) 1,257,769 1,289,898 (32,129) Net Changes during 2020-21 $ 84,702 $ 235,739 (151,037) City of Bradbury
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 8 - Defined Benefit Pension Plans (Continued)
Pension Liabilities, Pension Expenses, and Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pension (Continued)
Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability and Pension Expense (Continued) The following is the approach established by the plan actuary to allocate the net pension liability and pension expense to the individual employers within the risk pool.
(1) In determining a cost-sharing plan's proportionate share, total amounts of liabilities and assets are first calculated for the risk pool as a whole on the valuation date (June 30, 2020). The risk pool's fiduciary net position ("FNP"') subtracted from its total pension liability ("TPL") determines the net pension liability ("NPL") at the valuation date.
(2) Using standard actuarial roll forward methods, the risk pool TPL is then computed at the measurement date (June 30, 2021). Risk pool FNP at the measurement date is then subtracted from this number to compute the NPL for the risk pool at the measurement date. For purposes of FNP in this step and any later reference thereto, the risk pool's FNP at the measurement date denotes the aggregate risk pool's FNP at June 30, 2021 less the sum of all additional side fund (or unfunded liability) contributions made by all employers during the measurement period (2020-2021).
(3) The individual plan's TPL, FNP and NPL are also calculated at the valuation date. TPL is allocated based on the rate plan's share of the actuarial accrued liability. FNP is allocated based on the rate plan's share of the market value assets.
(4) Two ratios are created by dividing the plan's individual TPL and FNP as of the valuation date from (3) by the amounts in step (1), the risk pool's total TPL and FNP, respectively. (5) The plan's TPL as of the Measurement Date is equal to the risk pool TPL generated in (2) multiplied by the TPL ratio generated in (4). The plan's FNP as of the Measurement Date is equal to the PNP generated in (2) multiplied by the FNP ratio generated in (4) plus any additional side fund (or unfunded liability) contributions made by the employer on behalf of the plan during the measurement period. (6) The plan's NPL at the Measurement Date is the difference between the TPL and FNP calculated in (5).

Deferred outflows of resources, deferred inflows of resources, and pension expenses are allocated based on the City's share of contributions during the measurement period.

The City's proportionate share of the net pension liability was as follows:

Miscellaneous
Plan
June 30, 2020 0.00109%
June 30, 2021 -0.00059%
Change - Increase (Decrease) -0.00169%
City of Bradbury
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 8 - Defined Benefit Pension Plans (Continued)
Pension Liabilities, Pension Expenses, and Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pension (Continued)
Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability and Pension Expense (Continued) For the year ended June 30, 2022, the City recognized pension credit of $149,755 for the miscellaneous plan.

The amortization period differs depending on the source of the gain or loss. The difference between projected and actual earnings is amortized over 5-years straight line. All other amounts are amortized straight-line over the average expected remaining service lives of all members that are provided with benefits (active, inactive and retired) as of the beginning of the measurement period.

The expected average remaining service lifetime ("EARSL") is calculated by dividing the total future service years by the total number of plan participants (active, inactive, and retired) in the risk pool. The EARSL for risk pool for the 2020-2021 measurement period is 3.7 years, which was obtained by dividing the total service years of 561,622 (the sum of remaining service lifetimes of the active employees) by 150,648 (the total number of participants: active, inactive, and retired).

At June 30, 2022, the City reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources:

Miscellaneous Plan
Deferred outflows Deferred inflows
of Resources of Resources
Pension contribution made after measurement date $ 30,103 $ Difference between Expected and Actual Experience : (3,604) Actual earnings in excess of expected earning
28,044
Adjustment due to differences in proportions 39,600 :

Difference between employer's actual contributions
and employer's proportionate share of contributions (37,403) Total $ 97,747 (41,007)
For the year ended June 30, 2022, deferred outflows of resources related to pensions was $30,103, resulting from City's contributions subsequent to the measurement date, will be recognized as a reduction of the collective net pension liability in the year ending June 30, 2023.

Other amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows:

Year Ending June 30, Miscellaneous Plan
2023 $ 4,109
2024 6,418
2025 8,358
2026 7,752
2027
Thereafter :

Total $ 26,637
41 City of Bradbury
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 9 - Classification of Fund Balances
At June 30, 2022, fund balances are classified in the governmental funds as follows:

Major Speical Revenue Funds
Public Nonmajor
General Transportation Governmental
Fund UUT COPS Fund (Prop A) Funds Total
Nonspendable:

Prepaid items 179 $ = S
- 179
Restricted:

Covid 19 1,032
COPS : 57,490 : 1,032
57,490
Gas Tax 784
Proposition C 784
17,709 17,709
Country Park Grant 9,233 9,233
Proposition A 28,054 28,054
Measure R -
83,105 83,105
STPL •
- 1,053 1,053
Recycling - 25,746 25,746
Fire Grant 6,300 6,300
Measure M 60,808
TDA 60,808
739 739
SB 1 Gas Tax 9,550
Measure W 9,550
10,864 10,864
Total Restricted 1,032 57,490 28,054 225,891
312,467
Committed:

Sewer improvements
and operations 605 605
Clean water : 590,323 :
590,323
Total Committed 590,323
605 590,928
Assigned:

Economic uncertainties 1,000,000
Unassigned 1,000,000
3,161,070 3,161,070
Total Fund Balances $ 4,162,281 $ 590,323 $ 28,054 226,496 57,490 $ 5,064,644
In order to prudently protect its fiscal solvency, the City maintains a minimum assigned fund balance of $1,000,000 as reserves for economic uncertainties. The reserve is important in order to:
• Ensure that the City is able to respond to the challenges of a changing environment. • Reduce the budgetary impacts of bad economic times.
• Insulate the City from actions of the State that may result in reduction of revenues. • Mitigate exposure to natural disasters or other catastrophic events. • Demonstrate continued creditworthiness to bond rating agencies and the financial community. 42 City of Bradbury
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 9 - Classification of Fund Balances (Continued)
The nature and purpose of each reserve is described below:

A. Infrastructure - funds set aside for one-time infrastructure expenditures relating to City owned infrastructure repairs such as streets, sewers or other City facilities.

B. Economic changes, natural disaster or other catastrophic events - funds set aside for local disasters, emergencies, and / or unexpected economic changes that adversely impact the City's financial position.

This reserve was not formally adopted by the City Council.

Note 10 - Other Required Disclosures
Excess of Expenditures over Appropriations
Excess
Expenditures over
Appropriations Expenditures Appropriations
Nonmajor Governmental Funds:

TDA Special Revenue Fund
Public works $ - $ 5,519 $ (5,519)
The excess was due to higher than anticipated expenditures that exceeded the approved appropriations. The Council was informed of the excesses through monthly reports, and that the expenditures were higher than yearly budgeted amounts due to unforeseen expenses. However, the Council did not formally increase the budgetary appropriations since the revenues were higher than expected and they exceeded the total expenditures.

Note 11 - Commitments and Contingencies
A. Grants
The City participates in Federal and State grant programs. These programs are subject to further examination by the grantors. Expenditures which may be disallowed by the granting agencies, if any, cannot be determined at this time. The City expects such amounts, if any, to be immaterial.

B. Litigation
The City has not been named in any lawsuit that has a potentially material effect on its financial position. There is one matter involving a threat of litigation, which has been accrued in the City's financial position. While the outcome of this matter if litigation is commenced is not presently determinable, in the opinion of management of the City, based in part on the advice of counsel, the resolution of this matter is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations of the City. 43 City of Bradbury
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Note 12 - Prior Period Adjustments
The General Fund beginning fund balance was restated from $3,286,001 to $3,158,018 and the Governmental Activity beginning net position was also restated from $8,413,949 to $8,285,966 due to correction of American Rescue Plan Act revenue recognition.
44 REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
45 This page intentionally left blank.
46 City of Bradbury
Required Supplementary Information (Unaudited)
Budgetary Comparison Schedule
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
General Fund
Budget Variance with
= Original Final Actual Final Budget
REVENUES:

Taxes $ 816,764 $ 816,764 $ 818,178 1,414
Licenses and permits 161,000 161,000 161,372 372
Use of money and property 50,650 50,650 (31,219) (81,869) Intergovernmental 112,200 112,200 141,183 28,983
Charges for services 314,835 314,835 290,891 (23,944)
Other revenue 7,720 7,720 17,926 10,206
Total revenues = 1,463,169 1,463,169 1,398,331 (64,838) EXPENDITURES:

Current:

General government 983,395 983,395 885,087 98,308
Public safety 141,940 141,940 133,190 8,750
Parks and recreation 51,000 51,000 43,311 7,689
Total expenditures 1,176,335 1,176,335 1,061,588 114,747 REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 286,834 286,834 336,743 49,909 -
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:

Transfers in 665,476 665,476 667,520
2,044
Total other financing sources 665,476 665,476 667,520 2,044 Net change in fund balance 952,310 1,004,263 51,953
FUND BALANCE:

Beginning of year, as restated (Note 12) 3,158,018
End of year 4,162,281
47 City of Bradbury
Required Supplementary Information (Unaudited)
Budgetary Comparison Schedule (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Utility Users Tax (UUT) Special Revenue Fund
Budget Variance with
Original Final Actual Final Budget
•
REVENUES:

Use of money and property 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 4,446 (554)
Total revenues - 5,000 5,000 4,446 (554)
EXPENDITURES:

Current:

Public works 90,000 90,000 16,128 73,872
-
Total expenditures 90,000 90,000 16,128 73,872
Net change in fund balance (85,000) $ (85,000) (11,682) $ 73,318 FUND BALANCE:

Beginning of year 602,005
End of year $ 590,323
City of Bradbury
Required Supplementary Information (Unaudited)
Budgetary Comparison Schedule (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Citizens' Option for Public Safety (COPS) Speciai Revenue Fună Budget Variance with
= Original Final Actual Final Budget
REVENUES:

Use of money and property $ 2,500 $ 2,500 $ 2,742 242
Intergovernmental 100,000 100,000 102,117 2,117
Total revenues 102,500 102,500 104,859 2,359
EXPENDITURES:

Current:

Public safety 106,500 106,500 102,117 4,383
Total expenditures 106,500 106,500 102,117 4,383
-
Net change in fund balance (4,000) (4,000) 2,742 $ 6,742 FUND BALANCE:

Beginning of year 54,748
End of year $ 57,490
49 City of Bradbury
Required Supplementary Information (Unaudited)
Budgetary Comparison Schedule (Continued)
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Public Transportation Fund (Prop A) Special Revenue Fund Budget Variance with
- Original Final Actual Final Budget
REVENUES:

Use of money and property $ 200 $ 200 62 (138)
Intergovermental 25,000 25,000 26,566 1,566
Total revenues = 25,200 25,200 26,628 1,428
Net change in fund balance 25,200 $ 25,200 26,628 1,428 FUND BALANCE:

Beginning of year 1,426
End of year $ 28,054
50 City of Bradbury
Required Supplementary Information (Unaudited)
Budgetary Information
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Budget and Budgetary Accounting
The City adopts an annual budget prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting for the governmental funds. The City Manager or his designee is authorized to transfer budgeted amounts between the accounts of any department. Revisions that alter th otal appropriations of any department or fund must be approved by City Council. Expenditures may not legally excee appropriations at the program level.
51 City of Bradbury
Required Supplementary Information (Unaudited)
Schedule of the City's Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Last Ten Fiscal Years
California Public Employees' Retirement System ("CaIPERS") Miscellaneous Plan Measurement Date 6/30/2015' June 30, 2016 June 30, 2017 June 30, 2018 June 30, 2019 City's Proportion of the Net Pension Liability 0.00256% 0.00077% 0.00077% 0.00070% 0.00089% 175,694 $ 66,246 $ 76,419 $ 67,418 91,291
City's Covered Payroll 167,611 203,105 185,286 200,481 213,242 City's Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability as a Percentage of Its Covered Payroll 104.82% 32.62% 41.24% 33.63% 42.81% Plan's Proportionate Share of the Fiduciary Net Position as a Percentage of the Total Pension Liability 78.51% 92.47% 92.41% 93.76% 91.53% ' Historical information is presented only for periods after GASB 68 implementation in 2013-14. Additional years of information will be displayed as it becomes available.
52 City of Bradbury
Required Supplementary Information (Unaudited)
Schedule of the City's Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios (Continued) For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Last Ten Fiscal Years
California Public Employees' Retirement System ("CalPERS") Miscellaneous Plan Measurement Date June 30, 2020 June 30, 2021
City's Proportion of the Net Pension Liability 0.00109% -0.00059% City's Proportionate Share of
the Net Pension Liability (assets) $ 118,908 $ (32,129) City's Covered Payroll 220,732 236,424
City's Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability as a Percentage of Its Covered Payroll 53.87% -13.59%
Plan's Proportionate Share of the Fiduciary Net Position as a Percentage of the Total Pension Liability 89.86% 102.55% 53 City of Bradbury
Required Supplementary Information (Unaudited)
Schedule of the City's Contributions - Pensions
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Last Ten Fiscal Years
California Public Employees' Retirement System ("CalPERS") Miscellaneous Plan Fiscal Year 2014-15' 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
Actuarially Determined Contribution $ 29,107 $ 13,626 $ 11,319 14,550 $ 17,974 Contribution in Relation to the
Actuarially Determined Contribution? (29,107) (163,293) (11.319) (14,550) (149,667) 3 17974)
Contribution Deficiency (Excess)
Covered Payroll 167,611 203,105 185,286 200,481 $ 213,242 Contributions as a Percentage of
Covered Payroll 17.37% 6.71% 6.11% 7.26% 8.43%
=
Historical information is presented only for periods after GASB 68 implementation in 2013-14. Additional years of information will be displayed as it becomes available.
"Payroll from prior year $236,424 was assumed to increase by 2.75 percent payroll growth assumption from 2020-21 to 2021-22.

Notes to Schedule
Change in Benefit Terms: There were no changes to benefit terms.

Changes of Assumptions: In 2021, 2020 and 2019, there were no changes in assumptions. In 2018, demographic assumptions and inflation rate were changed in accordance to the CaPERS Experience Study and Review of Actuarial Assumptions December 2017. There were no changes in the discount rate. In 2017, the accounting discount rate reduced from 7.65 percent to 7.15 percent. In 2016, there were no changes. In 2015, amounts reported reflect an adjustment of the discount rate from 7.5 percent (net of administrative expense) to 7.65 percent (without a reduction for pension plan administrative expense.) In 2014, amounts reported were based on the 7.5 percent discount rate.

City of Bradbury
Required Supplementary Information (Unaudited)
Schedule of the City's Contributions - Pensions (Continued) For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Last Ten Fiscal Years
California Public Employees' Retirement System ("CalPERS) Miscellaneous Plan Fiscal Year 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Actuarially Determined Contribution 18,537 $ 24,748 $ 30,103 Contribution in Relation to the
Actuarially Determined Contribution? (18,537) (24,748) (30,103) Contribution Deficiency (Excess) $ $
Covered Payroll $ 220,732 236,424 $ 242,926
Contributions as a Percentage of
Covered Payroll 8.40% 10.91% 12.39%
55 This page intentionally left blank.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
57 This pase intentionally left blank.

NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS:

County Park Grant Special Revenue Fund - To account for the park grants provided by state and county agencies to build the recreational park located behind City Hall.

Measure R Special Revenue Fund - To account for the receipt and disbursement of funds form Los Angeles County which were created by a voter approved sales tax in 2008. These funds are allocated by Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) to fund street projects.

Surface Transportation Program Local (STPL) Special Revenue Fund - To account for the receipt and disbursement of funds received from the State of California through the MTA and must be used for street improvements on certain major streets within the Recycling Grant Special Revenue Fund - To account for the receipt and disbursement of funds received from the State of California for programs that promote the recycling of waste materials.

Fire Grant Special Revenue Fund - To account for the receipt and disbursement of grant funds received from the U.S. Department of Forestry for brush clearance.

Measure M Special Revenue Fund - To account for the receipt and disbursement of funds form Los Angeles County which were created by a voter approved sales tax in 2016. These funds are allocated by MTA to fund street projects.

TDA Special Revenue Fund - To account for the receipt and distribution of funds allocated by MTA originating from the Transportation Development Act, Article 3 for the planning and construction of pedestrian and bicycle facilities.

Gas Tax Special Revenue Fund - To account for the receipt and disbursement of gas tax subventions from the State of California.

Cities are allocated a share of the revenues derived by the State from taxes on gasoline, which must be spent on construction, improvement and maintenance of public streets and street engineering services.

Proposition C Special Revenue Fund - To account for the receipt and disbursement of a portion of the ½ cent sales tax approved by the voters in 1982 and 1990. Approximately 20% of the monies generated by the tax are returned to local agencies to be used for public transportation purposes and maintenance of streets "heavily used by public transit".

SB1 Gas Tax Special Revenue Fund - To account for the receipt and disbursement of funds received from the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017. These funds must be spent for local streets and roads.

Measure W Special Revenue Fund - To account for the receipt and disbursement of funds form Los Angeles County which were created by a voter approved sales tax in 2016. This is funded by a parcel tax of 2.5 cents per square foot of impermeable areas.

Sewer Special Revenue Fund - To account for assessments collected and projects funded with the assessments. 59 City of Bradbury
Combining Balance Sheet
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
June 30, 2022
- Special Revenue Funds
Recycling
County Park Measure R STPL Grant
Grant Fund Fund Fund Fund
-
ASSETS
Cash and investments 9,233 $ 83,105 $ 1,053 $ 31,409
Taxes receivable
Total assets 9,233 $ 83,105 $ 1,053 $ 31,409
-

LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES
Liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities • S
: s : s 5,663
Unearned revenues
Due to other funds
Total liabilities 5,663
Fund Balances:

Restricted 9,233 83,105 1,053 25,746
Committed
Total fund balances 9,233 83,105 1,053 25,746
Total liabilities and fund balances 9,233 83,105 $ 1,053 $ 31,409 (Continued)
City of Bradbury
Combining Balance Sheet (Continued)
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
June 30, 2022
- Special Revenue Funds
Fire Grant Measure M TDA Gas Tax
Fund Fund Fund Fund
-
ASSETS
Cash and investments $ 12,479 $ 60,808 $ $ 2,350
Taxes receivable 413
Total assets = 12,479 $ 60,808 420 2,350

LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES
Liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities - $ - 1,566
Unearned revenue: :

Due to other funds 6,179 (319)
Total liabilities 6,179 (319) 1,566
Fund Balances:

Restricted 6,300 60,808 739 784
Committed
Total fund balances 6,300 60,808 739 784
Total liabilities and fund balances 12,479 $ 60,808 420 $ 2,350 (Continued)
61 City of Bradbury
Combining Balance Sheet (Continued)
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
- Special Revenue Funds
Proposition C SB 1 Gas Tax Measure W
Fund Fund Fund Sewer
ASSETS
Cash and investments 18,414 $ 42,879 $ 10,864 $ 605
Taxes receivable
Total assets 18,414 $ 42,879 $ 10,864 605

LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES
Liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 705 33,329 $
Unearned revenues : :

Due to other funds
Total liabilities 705 33,329
Fund Balances:

Restricted 17,709 9,550 10,864
Committed -
Total fund balances 17,709 9,550 10,864 605
Total liabilities and fund balances 18.414 $ 42,879 10,864 $ 605 (Continued)
62 City of Bradbury
Combining Balance Sheet (Continued)
Nonmaior Governmental Funds
June 30, 2022
Total
Nonmajor
Governmental
Funds
ASSETS
Cash and investments $ 273,206
Taxes receivable 413
Total assets 273,619

LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES
Liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 35,600
Unearned revenues 5,663
Due to other funds 5,860
Total liabilities 47,123
Fund Balances:

Restricted 225,891
Committed 605
Total fund balances 226,496
Total liabilities and fund balances $ 273,619
(Concluded)
63 City of Bradbury
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Nonmajor Governmental Funds
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
- Special Revenue Fund
County Park Measure R STPL Recycling Grant
Grant Fund Fund Fund Fund
-
REVENUES:

Use of money and property $ 547 $ $ 47
Intergovernmental 16,524 5,000
Charges for services : 20,103
Total revenues 68 17,071 25,150
EXPENDITURES:

Current:

Public works
Capital outlay : : :

Total expenditures =

EXCESS OF REVENUE OVER (UNDER)
EXPENDITURES 68 17,071 7 25,150

OTHER FINANCING USES
Transfers out
-
Net change in fund balances 68 17,071 25,150
FUND BALANCES:

Beginning of year 9,165 66,034 1,046 596
-
End of year 9,233 83,105 1,053 25,746
(Continued)
64 City of Bradbury
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances (Continued) Nonmajor Governmental Funds
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
- Special Revenue Fund
Fire Grant Measure M TDA Gas Tax
- Fund Fund Fund Fund
REVENUES:

Use of money and property $ $ 370 $ 17 $ 80
Intergovernmental 16,034 18,699 5,000 27,833
Charges for current services
Total revenues = 16,034 19,069 5,017 27,913
EXPENDITURES:

Current:

Public works 3,555 5,519 27,318
Capital outlay : 14,168
Total expenditures 3,555 5,519 41,486

EXCESS OF REVENUE OVER (UNDER)
EXPENDITURES 12,479 19,069 (502) (13,573)

OTHER FINANCING USES
Transfers out
-
Net change in fund balances 12,479 19,069 (502) (13,573) FUND BALANCES:

Beginning of year (6,179) 41,739 1,241 14,357
End of year 6,300 60,808 $ 739 $ 784
(Continued)
65 City of Bradbury
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances (Continued) Nonmajor Governmental Funds
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
- Special Revenue Fund
Proposition C SB 1 Gas Tax Measure W Sewer
- Fund Fund Fund Fund
REVENUES:

Use of money and property 140 340 $ $ 2,265
Intergovernmental 22,036 17,238 53,094% -
Charges for current services
Total revenues = 22,176 17,578 53,094 2,265
EXPENDITURES:

Current:

Public works 8,803 42,230
Capital outlay 15,347 S161i
Total expenditures 24,150 51,611 42,230

EXCESS OF REVENUE OVER (UNDER)
EXPENDITURES (1,974) (34,033) 10,864 2,265

OTHER FINANCING USES
Transfers out (667,520)
-
Net change in fund balances (1,974) (34,033) 10,864 (665,255) FUND BALANCES:

Beginning of year 19,683 43,583 665,860
End of year 17,709 $ 2,550 $ 10,864 $ 605
66 City of Bradbury
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances (Continued) Nonmajor Governmental Funds
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Total
Nonmajor
Governmental
Funds
REVENUES:

Use of money and property $ 3,881
Intergovernmental 181,458
Charges for services 20,103
Total revenues 205,442
EXPENDITURES:

Current:

Public works 87,425
Capital outlay 81,126
Total expenditures 168,551

EXCESS OF REVENUE OVER (UNDER)
EXPENDITURES 36,891

OTHER FINANCING USES
Transfers out (667,520)
Net change in fund balances (630,629)
FUND BALANCES:

Beginning of year 857,125
End of year $ 226,496
(Concluded)
67 City of Bradbury
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Change in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual County Park Grant Special Revenue Fund
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Budget Variance with
= Original Final Actual Final Budget
REVENUES:

Use of money and property 500 500 $ 68 (432)
Total revenues - 500 500 68 (432)
EXPENDITURES:

Current:

Public works 1,000 1,000 1,000
Total expenditures = 1,000 1,000 1,000
Net change in fund balance (500) (500) 68 568
FUND BALANCE:

Beginning of year 9,165
End of year 9,233
68 City of Bradbury
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Change in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Measure R Special Revenue Fund
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Budget Variance with
Original Final Actual Final Budget
REVENUES:

Use of money and property $ 300 300 $ 547 247
intergovernmental 18,000 18,000 16,524 (1,476)
Total revenues 18,300 18,300 17,071 (1,229)
EXPENDITURES:

Capital outlay 88,739 88,739 88,739
Total expenditures 88,739 88,739 88,739
Net change in fund balance (70,439) $ (70,439) 17,071 $ 87,510 FUND BALANCE:

Beginning of year 66,034
End of year 83,105
69 City of Bradbury
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Change in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual STPL Special Revenue Fund
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Budget Variance with
Original Final Actual Final Budget
REVENUES:

Use of money and property $ 10 3)
Total revenues - 10 10 (3)
EXPENDITURES:

Capital outlay 1,055 1,055 1.055
Total expenditures - 1,055 1,055 1,055
Net change in fund balance (1,045) (1,045) 1,052
FUND BALANCE:

Beginning of year 1.046
End of year 1,053
70 City of Bradbury
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Change in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Recycling Grant Special Revenue Fund
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Budget Variance with
= Original Final Actual Final Budget
REVENUES:

Use of money and property $ 100 $ 100 47 $ (53)
Intergovernmental 5,000 5,000 5,000
Charge for current services 20,103 20,103
Total revenues = 5,100 5,100 25,150 20,050
EXPENDITURES:

Current:

Public works 5,000 5,000 5,000
Total expenditures 5,000 5,000 5,000
Net change in fund balance 100 $ 100 25,150 25,050
FUND BALANCE:

Beginning of year 596
End of year $ 25,746
71 City of Bradbury
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Change in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Fire Grant Special Revenue Fund
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Budget Variance with
Original Final Actual Final Budget
REVENUES:

Use of money and property 75 $ 75 $ (75)
Intergovernmental 24,994 24,994 16034 (8,960)
Total revenues 25,069 25,069 16,034 (9,035)
EXPENDITURES:

Current:

Public works 30,934 30,934 3,555 27,379
Total expenditures 30,934 30,934 3,555 27,379
Net change in fund balance (5,865) (5,865) 12,479 18,344 FUND BALANCE:

Beginning of year (6,179)
End of year $ 6,300
72 City of Bradbury
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Change in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Measure M Special Revenue Fund
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Budget Variance with
= Original Final Actual Final Budget
REVENUES:

Use of money and property $ 400 400 $ 370 $ (30)
Intergovernmental 16,500 16,500 18,699 2,199
Total revenues 16,900 16,900 19,069 2,169
EXPENDITURES:

Capital outlay - 58,470 58,470 38,470
Total expenditures 58,470 58,470 58,470
Net change in fund balance (41,570) $ (41,570) 19,069 2,169 FUND BALANCE:

Beginning of year 41,739
End of year 60,808
73 City of Bradbury
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Change in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual TDA Special Revenue Fund
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Budget Variance with
Original Final Actual Final Budget
REVENUES:

Use of money and property $ $ 17
Intergovernmental 5000 5000 5,000
Total revenues = 5,000 5,000 5,017 17
EXPENDITURES:

Current:

Public works 5,519 (5,519)
Capital outlay 5,000 5,000 5,000
Total expenditures 5,000 5,000 5,519 (519)
-
Net change in fund balance $ (502) (502)
FUND BALANCE:

Beginning of year 1,241
End of year $ 739
74 City of Bradbury
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Change in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Gas Tax Special Revenue Fund
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Budget Variance with
Original Final Actual Final Budget
REVENUES:

Use of money and property 200 $ 200 80 $ (120)
Intergovernmental 35,000 35,000 27,833 (7,167)
Total revenues = 35,200 35,200 27,913 (7,287)
EXPENDITURES:

Current:

Public works 36,929 36,929 27,318 9,611
Capital outlay - 14,168 14,168 14,168
Total expenditures - 51,097 51,097 41,486 9,611
Net change in fund balance (15,897) $ (15,897) (13,573) $ 2,324 FUND BALANCE:

Beginning of year 14,357
End of year 784
75 City of Bradbury
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Change in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Proposition C Special Revenue Fund
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Budget Variance with
= Original Final Actual Final Budget
REVENUES:

Use of money and property 450 450 140 $ (310)
Intergovernmental 23,000 23,000 22,036 (964)
Total revenues = 23,450 23,450 22,176 (1,274)
EXPENDITURES:

Current:

Public works 9,000 9,000 8,803 197
Capital outlay 36,570 36,570 15,347 21,223
Total expenditures = 45,570 45,570 24,150 21,420
Net change in fund balance (22,120) $ (22,120) (1,974) $ 20,146 FUND BALANCE:

Beginning of year 19,683
End of year $ 17,709
76 City of Bradbury
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Change in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual SB 1 Gas Tax Special Revenue Fund
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Budget Variance with
= Original Final Actual Final Budget
REVENUES:

Use of money and property 300 300 $ 340 $ 40
Intergovernmental 30,000 30,000 17,238 (12,762)
Total revenues 30,300 30,300 17,578 (12,722)
EXPENDITURES:

Current:

Public works
Capital outlay 81,615 81,615 51611 30,004
Total expenditures = 81,615 81,615 51,611 30,004
Net change in fund balance (51.315) $ (51.315) (34,033) $ 17,282 FUND BALANCE:

Beginning of year 43,583
End of year 9,550
77 City of Bradbury
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Change in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Measure W Special Revenue Fund
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Budget Variance with
= Original Final Actual Final Budget
REVENUES:

Intergovernmental 50,500 50,500 53,024 2,594
Total revenues - 50,500 50,500 53,094 2,594
EXPENDITURES:

Current:

Public works 50,500 50,500 42,230 8,270
Total expenditures 50,500 50,500 42,230 8,270
Net change in fund balance $ 10,864 10,864
FUND BALANCE:

Beginning of year
End of year 10,864
78 City of Bradbury
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Change in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Sewer Special Revenue Fund l
For the Year Ended June 30, 2022
Sewer Special Revenue Fund
Budget Variance with
Original Final Actual Final Budget
REVENUES:

Use of money and property 2,265 2,265
Total revenues - 2,265 2,265
OTHER FINANCING USES:

Transfers out (665,476) (665,476) (667,520) (2,044)
-
Total other financing uses (665,476) (665,476) (667,520) (2,044) Net change in fund balance (665,476) (665,476) (665,255) $ 221 FUND BALANCE:

Beginning of year 665,860
End of year 605
79 This page intentionally left blank.
08 INCORPORATEO
JULY 20, 1957 Richard Barakat, Mayor (District 3)
Richard Hale, Mayor Pro-Tem (District 1)
Monte Lewis, Councilmember (District 2)
Bruce Lathrop, Councilmember (District 4)
Elizabeth Bruny, Councilmember (District 5)

BRADBURY
City of Bradbury
Agenda Memo
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Mario Flores, Management Analyst
DATE: October 17, 2023
SUBJECT: Approval of Atlas Planning Solutions Proposal for the Update of a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Atlas Proposal for the Update of a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan

SUMMARY
After a bidding process for the update of a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP), it is recommended the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract for consultant services with Atlas Planning Solutions (Atlas) for the update of a LHMP in the not-to-exceed amount of $42,980.

BACKGROUND
Local Hazard Mitigation planning is the process of assessing vulnerabilities, measuring risk, identifying strategies for risk reduction, and assigning responsible parties to carry out appropriate action. This initiative involves a comprehensive study of multiple hazards that could impact a given municipality including natural, human-caused, and technological hazards. The planning process requires a number of stakeholders, including members of the public, coming together in a collaborative effort to attain a common objective of managing disaster-related risk.

A Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) is the output of this planning process and serves as a local municipality's long-term road map for community resiliency. Local municipalities are responsible to prepare, adopt, maintain, and update, a LHMP, once it has been reviewed by the Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) and approved by FEMA. Additionally, the Federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requires a community to have an approved LHMP in order to be eligible to apply for and receive FEMA hazard (
mitigation funds. Once a LHMP is adopted, FEMA requires that the LHMP be updated every five years. The City of Bradbury's (City) LHMP is now due for an update.

A comprehensive update of the City's LHMP will not only ensure that the City is eligible to receive FEMA hazard mitigation funds, but also will guide the City towards building a safer, more sustainable community. A comprehensive update of the City's LHMP supports the City Council priorities of Disaster Preparedness and Fiscal Responsibility.

On August 9, 2023, the City circulated a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Update of Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. The submission deadline was originally August 31, 2023 at 5:00 p.m. As this submission deadline approached, the City received only one (1) bid; therefore, the deadline date was extended to September 21, 2023. In response to the RFP circulated at the conclusion of the extended deadline date, the City received a total of seven (7) bid submissions. Below is an outline of the submitted responses.

Company Fee Estimate
Atlas Planning Solutions $42,980
Dynamic Planning + Science $50,000
Emergency Planning Consultants (EPC) $52,500
Interwest Consulting Group (Interwest) $55,000
IEM $71,280
Jacob Green & Associates $84,600
Outrider Insight LLC $78,500
Basemen ding eras a prop al a nas as there parano develope are . updated LHMP.

ANALYSIS
Atlas is a vendor that is made up of a staff with over 20 years of experience in assisting planners and decision-makers with comprehensive vulnerability assessments and hazard mitigation planning projects that have positive effects on local communities. Furthermore, Atlas has assisted a great number of local communities develop FEMA-approved Hazard Mitigation Plans. Communities that Atlas has assisted with developing LHMP's include the Cities of Anaheim, Duarte, Fullerton, Irvine, Laguna Beach, and Rancho Cucamonga.

Atlas utilizes a four-phase process to develop a LHMP update: (1) Planning and Development Process; (2) Mapping and Risk Assessment; (3) Conducting a Hazard Mitigation Strategy; and (4) Implementation and Maintenance Refinement. Atlas will collaborate with City Staff and the City's Public Safety Committee throughout the plan development process to create an effective plan tailored specifically for the City. Atlas will also conduct community outreach and engagement to alert residents and property owners about the planning process and importance of the LHMP, as required by FEMA. The entire planning process is expected to take approximately ten (10) months to complete.

Once completed, Atlas will present the final draft of the plan to City Council. The overall cost of the plan will not exceed $42,980.

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
The LHMP update will be funded from the City's general fund and will not exceed the amount of $42,980.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION
After a bidding process for the update of a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP), it is recommended the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract for consultant services with Atlas Planning Solutions (Atlas) for the update of a LHMP in the not-to-exceed amount of $42,980.

ATTACHMENT #1
EnCITY OF

BRADBURY
Proposal for:

Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
City of Bradbury
600 Winston Avenue
Bradbury, CA 91008
Atlas Planning Solutions
6578 BARRANCA DR | RIVERSIDE, CA 92506

Table of Contents
Table of Contents.

Cover Letter.
1 1. Project Team Overview
2 A. Atlas Planning Solutions. ...2
Atlas Planning Solutions Business Information ...2
Navigating Preparedness Associates (NPA) Firm Description. ..3 II. Proposed Work Program.. ..3
Project Understanding ..3
Atlas Planning Team Differentiators ...4
Project Approach .4
Scope of Work. .5
HMPC Meetings. .5
Outreach and Engagement
5 III. Project Team Qualifications. ...10
B. Qualifications and Experience of Proposed Project Staff .10 C. Team Organizational Chart.. 10
Project Experience. . 12
Atlas Planning Solutions' Hazard Mitigation Planning Experience. 12 Navigating Preparedness Associates (NPA) Hazard Mitigation Planning Experience 17 IV. Proposed Project Schedule and Timeline.. 18
V. Client References..
..19
VIl. Project Cost.. .20
VIII. Previous Failures or Refusals to Complete a Contract. .21 IX. Similar Local Hazard Mitigation Plans ................21 Attachment A - Staff Resumes.................. A-1
City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | i Atlas Planning Solutions
City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | ii Atlas Planning Solutions
Cover Letter
September 21, 2023 (Updated October 4, 2023)
Mario Flores
May of Bradt Analys
00 Winston Avenu
Bradbury, CA 91008
Dear Mr. Flores,
As a unique foothill community in the San Gabriel Valley, Bradbury faces numerous challenges associated with natural and human-caused hazards. Hazards like wildfire, landslides, and flooding, can have a significant impact on the daily lives of residents and city operations. Through the hazard mitigation planning process, the city can better understand how to manage the risks associated with the primary hazards that can impact the City. The City's desire to update its local hazard mitigation plan can become the catalyst to address many of the natural hazard issues and fix many of the problems created from past decisions. Knowing the challenges that cities face with limited budgets, reduced staffing, and limited resources, this opportunity can help ensure the community doesn't fall further behind.

This update can also provide opportunities for the City to better integrate the recently updated Safety Element and CWPP into their overall mitigation strategy. These documents can expand City capabilities and improve mitigation activities undertaken by City departments. In addition, this update process will require adherence to the latest revisions in FEMA guidance that went into effect on April 19, 2023. Atlas Planning is currently working with Cal OES and FEMA staff on one of the first plans to be approved under this new guidance, which can benefit Bradbury's update For the Atlas Planning Solutions Team, Aaron Pfannenstiel will serve as the project manager and the City's primary point of contact. Mr. Pfannenstiel is committed to ensuring the highest quality product and process for the City and ensures that all personnel proposed will work on this project.

As a firm principal, Aaron has read and will comply with all terms and conditions contained in this RFP and is authorized to negotiate and execute contracts on behalf of the firm. The Primary Point of Contact cost proposal included remains valid for 180 days from the Aaron Pfannenstiel date of submittal. If you have questions or would like to Principal schedule an interview with our team, please contact us at Phone: 951-444-9379 your convenience. Email: [email protected]
Respectfully submitted,
Aaron Pfannenstiel
City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | 1 Atlas Planning Solutions

1. Project Team Overview
A. Atlas Planning Solutions
Atlas Planning Solutions (APS) focuses on
making the world a better place. Founded in
2018 in Riverside, California, our mission is to
leverage our skills and experience in
comprehensive planning, climate adaptation,
and hazard mitigation, offering clients a wide
range of consulting services to help them
navigate their complex problems and issues.

Our focus is on successful client outcomes that
NAVIGATING A COMPLEX WORLD build agency capacity, create resilient places to live and work, and create communities that
thrive in this ever-changing landscape.

As a small, woman-owned, and service-
disabled veteran-owned business in the State of
California, APS understands that successful outcomes rely on client satisfaction, optimal project management, and a clear understanding of clients' needs. We strive to exceed our client's expectations, which has translated into repeat business and numerous referrals for our services.

APS specializes in the integration of planning tools like Local Hazard Mitigation Plans and Climate Adaptation Vulnerability Assessments into the General Plan. Since 2006, the State of California has incentivized the integration of these two documents, which has become a significant opportunity for communities throughout California.

Atlas Planning Solutions Business Information
Legal Name: Atlas Planning Solutions IS-Corporation, Incorporated in 2018 in the State of California.

Address: 6578 Barranca Drive, Riverside, CA 92506
Phone: 951-444-9376
Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Firm Principals/ Officers:
• Suzanne Murray - Principal/ CEO
• Aaron Pfannenstiel - Principal/ CFO/Project Manager
Staff Members:
• Dennis Larson - Senior Planner/GIS Analyst
• Crystal Stueve - Senior Planner
Robert Jackson - Associate Planner
Number of Years in Business: 4+ years
Number of Years Performing Requested Services: 22+ Years City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | 2 Atlas Planning Solutions
To support this effort, Atlas Planning Solutions has partnered with Navigating Preparedness Associates. Our two firms frequently partner on projects to provide better client service and increased capabilities. The following are details regarding the firm and personnel:

Navigating Preparedness Associates (NPA) Firm Description Navigating Preparedness Associates (NPA), Limited Liability Corporation (LLC) is a Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Enterprise (SDVBE), California #1770371, with a single office located in Lafayette, California. Founded in 2014, NPA provides emergency management solutions for local, state, and federal government and private industry. Our associates are experts in delivering solutions across a broad spectrum of mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery functions.

Navigating Preparedness Associates (NPA) has decades of experience in the following areas:
• Disaster Mitigation Act (DMA) 2000 Compliant Hazard Mitigation Plans • Water District Emergency Preparedness
• Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response
• City, County, and Special District Emergency Operations Plans • Maritime Threat Analysis and Response
• Catastrophic Incident Planning
• Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) Compliant Exercises Il. Proposed Work Program
Project Understanding
The City's desire to update the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) is a significant step towards improving the quality of life for current and future residents and property owners. Based on the RFP, the Atlas Planning Solutions (APS) team understands that this updated plan must:
• Meet Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) requirements and the latest guidance prepared by FEMA, which went into effect on April 19, 2023. • Meet the current and future needs of Bradbury staff and City Departments.

Meet the current and future needs of residents and property owners. • Identify updated mitigation strategies and actions that make the community safer and more disaster resistant.

Create an easy and staff focused process to streamline the LHMP update.

Remain consistent with the City's General Plan, Emergency Operations Plan, and California State Hazard Mitigation Plan. • Provide opportunities for community members and stakeholders to participate in the planning process.

City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | 3 Atlas Planning Solutions
Atlas Planning Team Differentiators
Based on this understanding, the APS Team offers the following differentiators:

Passion - Members of our team are passionate about helping clients tackle the issues surrounding climate change, sustainability, hazards, and resilience. Helping clients address these issues is something we care about personally and
professionally.

Experience - Members of our team have worked Passion
in urban planning, hazard mitigation, and
emergency management for decades. This
experience has helped save time and money and
avoid many pitfalls that have befallen other
jurisdictions in the past. Knowledge
Experience
Creativity - Hazard mitigation planning can be a
creative endeavor for our clients. Facilitating this
process has allowed many agencies to challenge
some of the long-held beliefs, establish new
policies, and create projects and opportunities that Creativity leverage this process.

Knowledge - Our team understands how hazard
mitigation plans fit into the bigger picture for a City like Bradbury. Leveraging the process allows for better integration into city systems and processes. Our goal is to ensure this plan and process helps the City better understand how to leverage new funding sources and accomplish more in the end.

Project Approach
The APS Team approach to updating Bradbury's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan requires adherence to the following:

Federal Laws
• Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act), as amended Federal Regulations
• 44 CFR Part 201 Mitigation Planning.
• 44 CFR, Part 60, Subpart A, including § 60.3 Flood plain management criteria for flood-prone areas. • 44 CFR Part 77 Flood Mitigation Grants
• 44 CFR Part 206 Subpart N. Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

Federal Guidance
• FEMA Local Mitigation Planning Policy Guide (FP 206-21-0002), effective April 19, 2023 State Requirements
• California Government Code §8685.9 and §65302.6 (commonly referred to as Assembly Bill 2140) - incentivizing integration of the LHMP into the General Plan Safety Element • California Government Code §65302 (G)(4) - requiring hazards exacerbated by climate change be discussed in the General Plan Safety Element
City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | 4 Atlas Planning Solutions
To complete this, the APS Team proposes the following project approach:

Phase 1: LHMP Phase 2:

Planning / Mapping and Phase 3: Hazard Phase 4:

Development Mitigation Implementation
Risk Assessment and Maintenance
Process Updates Strategy Updates
Refinement
Scope of Work
The following scope of work is based on the APS Team's understanding of the desired tasks and level of effort necessary to complete a DMA 2000-compliant LHMP update. The scope developed is consistent with the City's RFP, including tasks that ensure an efficient and effective planning process. If any proposed tasks need refinement or further discussion, the APS Team will be happy to work with staff to address their needs.

Phase 1 - LHMP Planning/Development Process
APS will conduct a Kick-Off meeting (in person or virtual) with key staff to form the Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee (HMPC), including key City Departments, identified stakeholders, and other relevant organizations/agencies that support City functions. As part of this meeting, the APS Team will conduct initial research and discuss key project outcomes, prior planning efforts, and current issues facing the City.

HMPC Meetings
Since this is an update to the plan, the APS Team anticipates the need for two internal HMPC meetings (in person or virtually) to facilitate the hazard mitigation planning process. A summary of the anticipated topics for these meetings include:

HMPC Meeting 1 - Review the planning process, update to key hazards of concern, data gathering and research, review of base map and hazards mapping, and confirmation of critical facilities list.

HMPC Meeting 2 - Review of hazards and risk assessment and discussion of mitigation actions and strategies.

Documentation of these meetings will become a foundation of the planning process described in the plan.

Outreach and Engagement
In preparation for outreach and engagement activities, the APS Team will prepare a memorandum to the City describing the community engagement strategy in terms of groups to be contacted, the Structure of meetings and workshops, and methods of advertising the events. As part of this task, the APS Team will coordinate with City staff to ensure the list of contacts is comprehensive and properly targeted.

City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | 5 Atlas Planning Solutions
Upon completion of the engagement memorandum, the APS Team will develop materials to advertise planned workshops and suggest additional methods of alerting residents and property owners about the planning process and the importance of the HMP. Content for the Bradbury News, Connect CTY (text messages), and print advertisements will be prepared for the community engagement opportunities identified in the memo.

As requested, the APS Team assumes two public meetings will be conducted, to provide input during plan development. The following meetings are anticipated:

Bradbury Public Safety Committee Meeting
The APS Team recommends conducting this meeting early in the planning process to allow the Committee and residents an opportunity to learn about the planning process and provide feedback regarding the previous plan and new issues or trends of concern that the updated plan can address. This meeting will include a formal presentation to the committee.

Bradbury City Council Meeting
Upon completion of the Cal OES/FEMA review process, the APS Team will support City staff with final adoption of the LHMP. This step in the process concludes the project and ensures compliance with state and Federal requirements. Upon adoption, the City becomes eligible for FEMA hazard mitigation grants for another 5-year period. This meeting will include a formal presentation to City Council.

City Staff Requirements
The APS Team anticipates City staff will support this task by reviewing the engagement strategy memo and outreach content; posting outreach content to the City website and newsletter; assisting with arranging meeting locations, timing, and pertinent information; and attending meetings to provide feedback during the planning process.

Phase 2 - Hazards Assessment Update
The APS Team, in partnership with the HMPC,
will discuss the current hazards profiled in the Current Hazard Profiles 2019 plan. During HMPC Meeting #1 these Earthquake Hazards (includes Liquefaction) hazard profiles will be confirmed and additional Wildfire Hazards hazards/requirements will be discussed. The Flood Hazards following list identifies the current hazards Landslide Hazards profiled and potential changes due to updated Windstorm Hazards FEMA guidance: Drought Hazards
Climate Change (new requirement)
City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | 6 Atlas Planning Solutions
As part of the hazard profile updates

CITY OF IRVINE
additional GIS mapping and analysis will be
conducted if deemed necessary. Through Seismic Shaking
Potential
this process, the City will have a deeper
understanding of local conditions and how LEGEND
• Cribcal fooler
your critical facilities may be affected (see
• Facity of Coscens
Figure 1 for an example. — City Boundary
As a standard practice, the APS Team 35
addresses climate change within each
hazard profile to ensure compliance with SB
DRAFT
379 requirements as well as FEMA guidance.

This approach has been used by APS and
has been found to make it easier to focus on

2...
updating the content within the plan, Figure 1 - Example of LHMP Seismic Hazards Mapping improving readability and continuity. The data
and information gathered during this task will be shared with the HMPC during Meeting #1. During this task, we typically provide a public outreach opportunity that conveys the overall project information and initial information gathered on the hazards of concern identified by the HMPC for public input and feedback.

City Staff Requirements
The APS Team anticipates City staff will provide feedback on relevant hazards, data, and historical information on the hazards of concern and guidance on new issues or concerns to be incorporated into the plan.

Asset Inventory and Vulnerability Analysis
Upon confirming the City's critical facilities inventory and initial GIS mapping, the APS Team will conduct a vulnerability assessment that relies on this information. This vulnerability assessment will include potential loss estimates, an analysis of the City's development trends and potential changes to demographics, and a social vulnerability analysis, relying on available GIS datasets provided by the City or other local, state, and/or federal agencies (FEMA National Risk Index). All maps prepared will be provided in both ArcGIS and PDF formats for City use. The data and information gathered during this task will be shared with the HMPC during Meeting #1. A key input will include using FEMA's National Risk Index to estimate potential losses (Figure 2). This is in place of HazUS, as FEMA is now relying on this index to ensure greater consistency between local planning efforts and datasets developed by State and Federal agencies.

Composite Expected Annual Loss $1,472,058.33
Composite Expected Annual Loss Rate National Percentile 94.9 Building EAL $1.407.227.20 Population EAL 0.01 fatalities Bulldling EAL Rate 51 per $305.23 of bullding value Population EAL Rate 1 per 225.53K people
Agriculture EAL $0.09
Population Equivalence EAL $64,931.04
Agriculture BAL Rate s1 per a, sek of agriculure
Figure 2 - FEMA Nationai Risk Index - Composite Annual Loss for Bradbury City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | 7 Atlas Planning Solutions
In addition to the mapping and analysis, the APS Team will also update the Capabilities Assessment to meet new FEMA requirements. This task includes a review of the existing planning regulations and programs that can support current mitigation capabilities. A key element of this review is identifying ways to expand this capability to ensure future efforts are easier and better integrated into the City mitigation planning framework.

City Staff Requirements
The APS Team anticipates City staff will provide feedback on the Critical Facilities Inventory, the vulnerability assessment and capabilities assessment results, and any relevant data/information that may assist with the analysis as part of this task.

Phase 3 - Hazard Mitigation Strategy
To initiate the development of mitigation strategies and actions, the APS Team will review the recently updated General Plan Safety Element, Community Wildfire Protection Plan, Capital Improvement Plans, LHMPs from surrounding cities, and the State of California HMP. Based on this review, recommendations for the plan's hazard mitigation goals will be provided to the HMPC for discussion and feedback.

Upon completion of the Capabilities Assessment and Mitigation Goals, the APS Team will prepare City mitigation strategies and actions for future implementation. Using our mitigation action worksheets, we will identify the department lead for the specific mitigation action, funding and staffing resources, time frame for completion, and implementation steps for each prioritized mitigation action. The data and information gathered during this task will be shared with the HMPC during Meeting #2. As part of the mitigation actions development, the APS Team will create a Monitoring and Implementation Workbook that is incorporated into the Appendix of the LHMP.

This workbook is intended to help City staff understand how mitigation actions should be monitored and implemented and opportunities to incorporate the plan and mitigation strategies and actions into other City functions and plans.

City Staff Requirements
The APS Team anticipates that City staff will provide feedback on potential strategies and capital improvement projects that may become actions. During HMPC Meeting #2, it is expected that participants will help identify additional actions to incorporate into the plan, priorities for these actions, and other relevant information to finalize them.

Phase 4 - Hazard Mitigation Plan Maintenance Process
Upon completing Phases 1 through 3, the APS Team will prepare the Administrative Draft LHMP for City staff review. Using the process identified above, members of the HMPC will be assisting with pian development as the research, mapping, and analysis are conducted. In doing so, HMPC members will recognize much of the plan content based on their feedback and review in HMPC meetings 1 and 2. Upon completion, the plan will be provided to City staff for review and comment.

Completion of the Administrative Draft LHMP will include a Chapter within the plan that identifies the following key information required by FEMA:
• LHMP Monitoring, Evaluation, Implementation, and Updates • Incorporation of the LHMP in existing planning mechanisms • Schedule for LHMP Implementation
• Continued Public Involvement during the 5-year implementation period.

City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | 8 Atlas Planning Solutions
Once the APS Team has received a consolidated set of comments on the Administrative Draft Plan, the Public Review Draft LHMP will be prepared alongside the FEMA Plan Review Tool, which accompanies the plan when submitted to Cal OES/FEMA for approval.

City Staff Requirements
The APS Team anticipates City staff will provide feedback on the Administrative Draft HMP document. If HMPC members identify additional information during this review, this information can be shared and incorporated into the Public Review Draft LHMP.

Public Draft Review and Revision
Upon completion of revisions and approval from the City, the Public Review Draft LHMP will be distributed for public review. Using the City's website, monthly newsletter, and distribution lists, the APS Team will work with staff to identify where the document can be accessed, either electronically or in hard copy. We typically recommend a review period of 30 days, but this can be modified based on staff desires and schedule constraints. We also anticipate City staff will share this as an informational item at the Bradbury Public Safety Committee meeting that occurs during the public review process, allowing for questions, comments, and feedback from the public and elected/appointed officials. A compilation of public review comments will be incorporated into the plan, where appropriate, before transmittal to Cal OES/FEMA.

City Staff Requirements
The APS Team anticipates City staff will assist with outreach and engagement efforts during the public review period. Relying on content prepared by the APS Team, we will work with City staff during the public review period so they have the information needed to effectively share with residents and property owners.

Cal OES/FEMA Draft Review
Upon completing the public review period, the APS Team will review the comments received and prepare the LHMP for transmittal to Cal OES/FEMA. Completing this task also includes finalizing the FEMA Plan Review Tool (Crosswalk), which accompanies the document when transmitted Upon receiving comments from Cal OES and FEMA (if warranted), the APS Team will prepare revisions and coordinate with agency staff until deemed satisfactory, allowing for City adoption.

City Staff Requirements
The APS Team anticipates City staff will review requested revisions by Cal OES/FEMA, if necessary.

Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Adoption
Upon receiving an Approvable Pending Adoption (APA) letter from FEMA, the APS Team will prepare a final version of the LHMP for presentation and adoption at City Council. The APS Team will assist staff with staff report content and an adoption resolution as part of this task.

City Staff Requirements
The APS Team anticipates City staff will provide preferred document templates/formats for adoption materials and provide comments and feedback on presentation materials prepared by the APS Team. This task also assumes City staff will coordinate the dates and times for adoption hearings and any notice required to support those hearings.

City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | 9 Atlas Planning Solutions
III. Project Team Qualifications
B. Qualifications and Experience of Proposed Project Staff The APS team is comprised of key staff with diverse skill sets and experience. We operate under a working principal model, whereby principal owners of the firm are actively involved and engaged with day-to-day client management, deliverable preparation, and project oversight based on client needs. The team members proposed for this effort are summarized below, and resumes are provided in Attachment A.

Aaron Pfannenstiel will serve as the Project Manager for the APS Team and brings over 20 years of community planning experience, focusing on emergency management, hazard mitigation, and community resiliency. With a background in geology, environmental studies, and urban planning, he helps clients understand hazards, assess vulnerabilities, and develop policies, programs, and mitigation strategies that make communities safer.

Suzanne Murray will serve as a Quality Assurance/Quality Control specialist. With over 16 years of technical writing and editing experience and an emphasis on documents and reports prepared for the federal government, including standard operating procedures, information reports, information and white papers, and presentations. Her primary role with Atlas Planning is preparing and reviewing hazard mitigation and emergency management documents.

Dennis Larson will serve as a senior planner and brings over 22 years of experience leading public agency management programs, policy research efforts, and technical analyses. Dennis will provide vital support to plan integration and vulnerability analysis portions of the plan. Mr. Larson's specialties include advanced planning project development, climate resiliency policy, Geographic Information Services, and economic impact analyses.

Crystal Stueve will serve as a primary researcher and author. With a strong background in writing and research and reliance on over 18 years of experience working for local and federal agencies, she understands the importance of clear communication, documentation of processes and outcomes, and developing plans that are easy to read, understand, and implement.

Robert Jackson will serve as a primary researcher and author. Mr. Jackson has supported Atlas Planning for the past three years, updating LHMPs and Safety Elements, and will bring that knowledge and experience to this effort for the City.

Lee Rosenberg is a Certified Emergency Manager (CEM) with over 35 years of experience leading real-world contingency operations and addressing complex emergency and disaster issues. Mr. Rosenberg is a retired US Navy Captain who also served as a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Region IX (RIX) Federal Coordinating Officer. Mr. Rosenberg will serve as a senior planner and subject matter expert for this project, lending his experience and leadership to this project.

C. Team Organizational Chart
To effectively manage the APS Team, the following organization chart was developed to highlight how team members will interact with the City. The primary point of contact for the APS Team, Aaron Pfannenstiel, will be the primary point of contact with the City's Project Manager and the go-between for the rest of the APS Team. This structure is similar to many of the other successful projects completed by our team in jurisdictions throughout California.

City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | 10 Atlas Planning Solutions
All staff proposed on this organizational chart will perform the duties prescribed in this proposal.

If, for any reason, a staffing change is required, Aaron Pfannenstiel will notify the City's Project Manager of the proposed change and receive written approval for the proposed change prior to new staff working on the project.

BRADBURY
Aaron Ptannenstiel
Role: Project
Manager
Crystal Stueve
Role: Assistant Project
Manager
Robert Jackson Dennis Larson Suzanne Murray
Role Document Role: GIS Analysis Quality Assurance/
Preparation and Quality Control
Analysis
Lee Rosenberg (NPA)
tole: LHMP Review
Support
City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | 11 Atlas Planning Solutions
Project Experience
Atlas Planning Solutions' Hazard Mitigation Planning Experience Atlas Planning Solutions staff have completed or are currently working on several Local Hazard Mitigation Plans and General Plan Safety Elements throughout the State. With extensive experience assisting communities as they address the changing legislative requirements and frameworks governing hazards and resiliency within California, Atlas Planning Solutions has a breadth of experience to support the City.

Over the past 10 years, Atlas Planning Solutions staff have assisted the following jurisdictions throughout Southern California (Jurisdictions in common with Bradbury are in bold):

Atlas Planning Solutions Prior Experience
Jurisdiction
LHMP Safety Climate
Element Adaptation Evacuation
Assistance Assistance
Assistance Assistance
City of Anaheim (2022)
City of Aliso Viejo (2023)
City of Canyon Lake (2022)
G
City of Capitola (2013)
City of Colton (2019)
City of Costa Mesa (2021)
G
City of Culver City/Culver City School
District (2017)
City of Duarte (2013)
City of Encinitas (2023)
City of Fullerton (2019)*
City of Hollister (2022)
City of Huntington Beach*
(2012, 2017, 2022)
City of Irvine (2020)*
City of La Palma (2020)
City of Laguna Beach (2018, 2021,
2023)*
City of Laguna Woods (2017)
City of Lancaster (2021)
City of Loma Linda (2022)
City of Maricopa (2015)
City of Palm Desert (2017)
City of Perris (2021)
City of Rancho Cucamonga (2021)
City of Redondo Beach (2020)
City of Santa Rosa (2016, 2022) G
City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Atlas Planning Solutions Page | 12
City of Saratoga (2012, 2023)
City of Seal Beach (2019)
City of South Gate (2018)
City of Stanton (2022)
City of Torrance (2017)
City of Vernon (2022)
City of Westminster (2017)
Town of Hillsborough (2023)
Town of Portola Valley (2023) 00
Town of Windsor (2017)
County of Butte (2023)
County of Inyo/City of Bishop (2017)
County of Mendocino (2021)
G
County of San Diego (2021)
County of Santa Clara (2023)
The following representative projects highlight Atlas Planning Solutions' relevant experience. Several of these provide reference information as identified by the RFP. 2023 Costa Mesa LHMP Update | City of Costa Mesa, CA
Atlas Planning Solutions is currently preparing the City of Costa Mesa's first Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. This plan focuses on key issues within the community, such as aircraft incidents, space weather, climate change, dam failure, seismic and geologic hazards, flooding, hazardous materials, and terrorism/mass-casualty incidents. As part of this effort, our team is also updating the City's Emergency Operations Plan and providing guidance on future updates to the General Plan Safety Element and Evacuation Assessment. The plan was recently reviewed by Cal OES and, after minor revisions, has been transmitted to FEMA for final review and approval. This project is currently within budget and the original schedule, even with delays suffered by the COVID-19 pandemic and changeover in City staff. Completion will occur on budget and within the original grant window identified by FEMA/Cal OES.

Duration: March 2021- March 2023
Cost: $150,000
Type of Contract: LHMP Preparation and Emergency Operations Plan Update Key Staff: Aaron Pfannenstiel, Suzanne Murray, Crystal Steve, Robert Jackson, Dennis Larson Reference Information
Company Name City of Costa Mesa
Contact Name and Title Brenda Emrick
Company Address 77 Fair Drive, Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Contact Telephone Number 714-327-7406
Contact Email [email protected]
Timeframe March 2021- March 2023
City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | 13 Atlas Planning Solutions
2022 Anaheim LHMP Update | City of Anaheim, CA
Atlas Planning Solutions recently updated the 2017 City of Anaheim LHMP. This update focused on re-prioritizing plan goals and mitigation actions. As part of the update, the City and APS collaborated on revisions to mitigation actions and priorities to ensure future actions were implementable, which was a big concern for the City. As part of this effort, Atlas Planning Solutions updated the City's General Plan Safety Element (adopted on 1/10/2023), addressing climate adaptation and evacuation concerns. This plan was approved in May 2022 and received zero comments from FEMA during their review. This project was completed on time and within the original budget.

Duration: June 2021 - May 2022 (LHMP Update Timeframe)
Cost: $110,000
Type of Contract: LHMP Update and General Plan Safety Element Update Key Staff: Aaron Pfannenstiel, Suzanne Murray, Crystal Stueve, Robert Jackson, Dennis Larson Reference Information
Company Name City of Anaheim
Contact Name and Title Dr. Jannine Wilmoth
Company Address 201 S. Anaheim Blvd, Suite 300, Anaheim, CA 92805 Contact Telephone Number 714-765-4095
Contact Email [email protected]
Timeframe June 2021 - January 2023
2022 | 2017 | 2012 Huntington Beach Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Updates | City of Huntington Beach, CA
Atlas Planning Solutions updated the City's 2022 LHMP. This is the third opportunity for Atlas Planning Solutions staff to support the City with their LHMP. Prior updates occurred in 2012 and 2017. These updates included reviews of city plans and policies, identification of facilities necessary for city operation, prioritization of hazards, preparation of hazard profiles that could impact the city, preparation of a risk assessment, and updated mitigation actions to reduce potential vulnerabilities in the future. The process included facilitating meetings with City department personnel and various stakeholders and close coordination with City staff to ensure that the appropriate focus and direction were used to complete the document. In addition, an online public opinion survey was distributed to over 3,000 residents, stakeholders, and interested parties via a press release, direct correspondence, and the City's website. The final review of both the 2012 and 2017 plans by Cal OES and FEMA Region IX resulted in minimal comments and revisions. The 2022 LHMP Update received zero comments from FEMA during their review and was adopted by the City in December 2022. This project was completed on time and within budget. All prior updates have also been completed in the same manner.

Contract Year: July 2021 - December 2022
Cost: $30,000
Type of Contract: LHMP Update
Key Staff: Aaron Pfannenstiel, Suzanne Murray, Crystal Steve, Robert Jackson, Dennis Larson )
City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | 14 Atlas Planning Solutions
Reference Information
Company Name City of Huntington Beach
Contact Name and Title Brevyn Mettler, Emergency Services Coordinator Company Address 2000 Main St, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Contact Telephone Number 714-374-1565
Contact Email [email protected]
Timeframe July 2021 - December 2022
2021 Rancho Cucamonga LHMP Update | City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA Atlas Planning Solutions has assisted the City of Rancho Cucamonga since December 2019 with various hazard-related efforts. During this time, the APS Team assisted with an update to the General Plan Safety Element (as part of the Plan RC project), updated the City's 2021 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, supported the preparation of an Evacuation Assessment that met both SB99 and AB 747 requirements, and is currently updating the City's Emergency Operations Plan.

Key concerns throughout these projects focus on the prevalence of high wildfire risks that could trigger the need for emergency response and evacuations. Key outcomes of this effort include better integration of the EOP, LHMP, and Evacuation Assessment with the General Plan Safety Element and the ability of the City to better align goals, policies, and implementation actions across these different planning frameworks. The LHMP Update was completed in approximately 15 months (suffering minor delays during the start of the COVID-19 pandemic). Review and approval by Cal OES and FEMA involved minor revisions that significantly streamlined the review and approval process. This project was completed on time and within budget.

Duration: February 2020 - May 2021 (LHMP Update Timeframe) Cost: $179,240
Type of Contract: LHMP Update, General Plan Safety Element Update, Evacuation Assessment, and EOP Update
Key Staff: Aaron Pfannenstiel, Suzanne Murray, Crystal Stueve, Robert Jackson Reference Information
Company Name
City of Rancho Cucamonga (Fire Protection District)
Contact Name and Title Joseph Ramos, Emergency Management Coordinator Company Address
10500 Civic Center Dr, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Contact Telephone Number 909-774-3009
Contact Email [email protected]
Timeframe December 2019 - December 2022
Vulnerability Assessment | County of Mendocino, CA 2021 County of Mendocino Safety Element Update, HMP Update, and Climate Adaptation Atlas Planning Solutions led a multi-disciplinary team that updated the Mendocino County Multi- Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan and General Plan Safety Element and prepared a Climate Adaptation Vulnerability Assessment. This update focused on recent wildfire incidents that have occurred within the region in the past three years, as well as the changing regulatory requirements necessary to ensure compliance with state law. Both the MJHMP and Climate Adaptation Vulnerability Assessment provide the foundation for goals and policies that the County and Cities will implement in the future, as well as mitigation strategies to further reduce potential hazards in the near term.

City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | 15 Atlas Planning Solutions
Duration: March 2020 - June 2021 )
Cost: $289,828
Type of Contract: Safety Element Update, LHMP Update, Climate Adaptation Vulnerability Assessment
Key Staff: Aaron Pfannenstiel, Suzanne Murray, Crystal Stueve, Robert Jackson Reference Information
Company Name County of Mendocino
Contact Name and Title Nash Gonzalez, Planning Director Company Address 501 Low Gap Road, Ukiah, CA 95482
Contact Telephone Number 707-234-6693
Contact Email [email protected]
Timeframe March 2020 - June 2021
2020 Irvine LHMP Update | City of Irvine, CA
Atlas Planning Solutions prepared the 2020 update of the City of Irvine LHMP. This update ocused on rerreshing the last updated plan in 2005 and ensuring the current version met all o he new FEMA requirements introduced in 2011. As part of the update, the APS Team had t navigate the changing conditions associated with COVID-19 restrictions and demands on staff time and capacity. The plan's update received minimal comments from Cal OES and obtained FEMA approval without comment.

Contract Year: August 2019 - August 2020
Cost: $75,101
Type of contract: LHMP Update
Key Staff: Aaron Pfannenstiel, Suzanne Murray, Crystal Stueve, Robert Jackson, Dennis Larson Reference Information
Company Name City of Irvine
Contact Name and Title Robert Simmons, Emergency Management Administrator Company Address 1 Civic Center Plaza, Irvine, CA 92606
Contact Telephone Number 949-724-7235
Contact Email [email protected]
Timeframe August 2019 - August 2020
2021 Laguna Beach Safety Element Update and 2018 Laguna Beach Local Hazard Mitigation Plan | City of Laguna Beach, CA
Atlas Planning Solutions staff have supported several projects for the City of Laguna Beach. In 2021 APS supported the City's update of the General Plan Safety Element. This update focused on streamlining the Safety Element, which was previously adopted in 1995. As part of this process, APS updated the element to ensure compliance with Government Code, updated (SB 1241, SB 379, AB 2140) and supported the City during the Cal Fire/ Board of Forestry review and approval process, and facilitated discussions with Emergency and Disaster Preparedness Committee members that collaborated on the element update process. During the update, Aaron worked with Marc veiner, James Brown, and Brenden Manning.

Priorto joining Atlas Planning Solutions, Aaron Pfannenstiel managed the preparation of the City's first LHMP. Key issues identified in this LHMP included wildfire (numerous incidents have City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | 16 Atlas Planning Solutions
impacted the community over the years), flooding, and landslides. During the hazard mitigation planning process, significant community outreach included social media outreach (via Facebook, Twitter, and Nextdoor), interactive and informative community workshops, and an online survey that gathered information from over 100 respondents. During the update, Aaron worked with Jordan Villwock (previous Emergency Services Coordinator for Laguna Beach).

Contract Year: June 2000 - August 2001 | July 2017 - June 2019 Cost: $115,000
Type of Contract: Safety Element Update | LHMP (New)
Key Staff: Aaron Pfannenstiel, Suzanne Murray, Robert Jackson, Crystal Stueve Company Name City of Laguna Beach
Contact Name and Title Marc Wiener, Community Development Director Company Address 505 Forest Avenue, Laguna Beach, CA 92651 Contact Telephone Number 949-497-0361
Contact Email [email protected]
Timeframe June 2020-August 2021
Company Name City of Ontario (for a project at City of Laguna Beach) Contact Name and Title Jordan Villwock, Fire Administration Director Company Address 415 E. B Street, Ontario, CA 91764
Contact Telephone Number 909-395-2543
Contact Email [email protected]
Timeframe July 2017-June 2019
Navigating Preparedness Associates (NPA) Hazard Mitigation Planning Experience NPA has completed the development of, or updates to, dozens of LHMPs. Key relevant past projects completed by NPA are identified below:
• Valley County Water District: LHMP update (2020)
• City of Lynwood LHMP (2020)
• City of Artesia LHMP (2020)
• City of Hawthorne LHMP (2020)
• County of Tulare Multi-jurisdiction LHMP (2018)
• Gila County, AZ Multi-jurisdiction LHMP (2018)
• City of Hermosa Beach LHMP (2017)
• City of Covina - Water Agency ERP (2017)
• City of Pittsburg, CA (2016)
• Water Emergency Transportation Authority: Develop LHMP and other projects (2016) City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | 17 Atlas Planning Solutions
IV. Proposed Project Schedule and Timeline
The schedule provided assumes an efficient planning process and discrete timeframes for internal and external outreach and coordination. Based on the proposed schedule, the APS Team anticipates a 9 to 10 month schedule to complete this project Understanding that the City's plan expires in February 2024, our goal is to complete the plan and submit it to Cal OES as soon as possible to reduce the amount of time the City is ineligible for grants. 2023 2024
LHMP Tasks October November | December January February March April May
June July
Phase 1: LHMP Planning/ Development Proce
Notice to Proceed
Project Kick-Off Meeting and Research
(HMPC identification, Stakeholder Identification)
HMPC Meetings (2)
Community Engagement Strategy/Content
Public Workshops (2)
Project Management/Coordination
Phase 2 horares assessment Updat
Hazard Profiles Update
Hazard Mapping
Hazard Vulnerability Assessment
Capability Assessment
Phase 3: Hazard Mitigation Strategy
Develop Hazard Mitigation Goals
Develop, Update, Evaluate, and Prioritize Mitigation Actions Mitigation Actions Implementation Plan
Maintenance Process
Administrative Draft HMP
Public Draft Review and Revision
Cal OES/FEMA Draft Review
Final Plan Approval and Adoption
* Denotes a Meeting (virtual or in person) Atlas Planning Team Tasks Review Periods (Staff, Public, Agency)
City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | 18 Atlas Planning Solutions
V Client References
The following client references are provided to the City of Bradbury for their review:

Client Name City of Huntington Beach
Contact Name and Title Brewyn Mettler, Emergency Services APS has supported the City on updates to both the
Coordinator Emergency Operations Plan
Company Address 2000 Main St, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 and Local Hazard Mitigation
Contact Telephone 714-374-1565 Plan. LHMP Updates have
Number occurred in 2012, 2017, and
Contact Email [email protected] 2022.

Timeframe July 2012 -Current
Client Name City of Irvine
Contact Name and Title APS supported the City's
Robert Simmons, Emergency Management LHMP Update, which Administrator included a focused EOP
Company Address 1 Civic Center Plaza, Irvine, CA 92606
update to integrate the
Contact Telephone 949-724-7235 LHMP content into the
Number document.

Contact Email
[email protected]
Timeframe August 2019 - August 2020
Client Name City of Anaheim
Contact Name and Title APS supported the City of
Dr. Jannine Wilmoth Anaheim with updates to
Company Address 201 S. Anaheim Blvd, Suite 300, their General Plan Safety Anaheim, CA 92805 Element and Local Hazard
Contact Telephone 714-765-4095 Mitigation Plan, which
Number included the preparation of a
Contact Email [email protected] Climate Adaptation
Timeframe June 2021 - January 2023 Vulnerability Assessment.

City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Atlas Planning Solutions Page | 19
VIl. Project Cost
Atlas Planning Solutions has provided the following cost proposal based on the following assumptions:
• Plan preparation will rely on readily available information from relevant existing plans and information from County and State plans.
• No issues are anticipated with the City's typical payment procedures and timeframes and agrees to the 10% retention requirement until FEMA approval has occurred. • No additional fees are anticipated beyond those identified in the proposed cost proposal. • A 10% project contingency budget is recommended to allow for unanticipated project needs or additional work desired by the City. Use of this budget would only occur with prior approval by the LHMP Project Manager.
iel erg
Task Name Total Fees
225 $ 140 $ 175 $ 135 $ 110 $ 165
Phase 1: LHMP Planning / Development Process 30 4 8 32 $12,260 Project Kick-Off Meeting and Research
2 $1,780
(HMPC identification, Stakeholder Identification)
HMPC Meetings (2) 8 $2,680
Community Engagement Strategy/Content 4 $2,340
Public Workshops (2) 8 $3,220
Project Management/Coordination 8 $2,240
Phase 2: Hazards Assessment Update 8 8 34 14 14 16 $14,940 Hazard Profiles Update 2 2 2 8 8 2 $3,370
Hazard Mapping 2 2 16 2 2 $4,020
Hazard Vulnerability Assessment 2 2 16 2 2 $4,020
Capability Assessment 2 2 2 2 14 $3,530
Phase 3: Hazard Mitigation Strategy 6 4 12 12 $4,850
Develop Hazard Mitigation Goals 2 4 4| $1,430
Develop, Update, Evaluate, and Prioritize Mitigation Actions 2 2 4 4 $1,710 Mitigation Actions Implementation Plan 2 2 4 4 $1,710
Phase 4: Hazard Mitigation Plan Maintenance Process 10 12 4 12 32 4 $10,430 Administrative Draft LHMP 4 2 4 12 4 $4,050
Public Draft Review and Revision 4 $2,780
Cal OES/FEMA Draft Review 2 2 8 $2,150
Final Plan Approval and Adoption 2 4 $1,450
Reimbursable Expenses (mileage, reproduction, other
$500
Grand Total 54 28 40 46 90 20 $42,980
The proposed fee is our best estimation based on our understanding of City needs. If any assumptions are incorrect or require refinement, the APS Team will be happy to work with the City to refine this estimate.

City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | 20 Atlas Planning Solutions
VIII. Previous Failures or Refusals to Complete a Contract Atlas Planning Solutions has not failed to or refused to complete a contract with any prior clients. All contracts executed have been completed to the satisfaction of the Client since the firm's inception.

IX. Similar Local Hazard Mitigation Plans
The following LHMPs are provided to Bradbury as examples of Atlas Planning Solutions work products and to share how our team has developed content in communities that share similar issues to the City. Each plan below has an embedded hyperlink to access the publicly available document.

Local Hazar
Mitigation Plan
2021
2022
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
PHAN August 2021
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | 21 Atlas Planning Solutions
Attachment A - Staff Resumes
The following resumes for Atlas Planning Solutions Team members supporting the Bradbury LHMP Update are provided below.

City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | A-1 Atlas Planning Solutions

AARON PFANNENSTIEL, AICP
Principal, CFO
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 951-444-9379
Years of Experience: 22

EDUCATION/DEGREES
• MURP, 2005, Regional Planning/Urban Planning, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona • BA, 2001, Environmental Studies, University of California at Santa Barbara • BS, 2001, Geological Sciences, University of California at Santa Barbara PROJECT MANAGER | SAFETY ELEMENT AND HAZARD MITIGATION SME Aaron has 20 years of experience in community planning, focusing on emergency management, hazard mitigation, and community resiliency. With a background in geology, environmental studies, and urban planning, he helps clients understand hazards, assess vulnerabilities, and develop policies, programs, and mitigation strategies that make communities safer. Over the past decade, he has also trained hundreds of students, planners, and other professionals in these topics.

Aaron incorporates hazard mitigation into comprehensive planning projects to increase resiliency in communities. He prepares local and multi-jurisdictional hazard mitigation plans, emergency operations plans, general plans, and safety elements. He recently assisted clients with developing innovative planning practices as part of a pilot program that enhances communities' adaptation to wildfires. Aaron has also prepared environmental documents for CEQA compliance and due diligence and feasibility studies, and he has conducted community outreach and education efforts in communities throughout California.

RELEVANT AND CURRENT EXPERIENCE
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Updates
Supported the preparation and updates of Local Hazard Mitigation Plans for the following jurisdictions:
• City of Anaheim • City of Loma Linda
• City of Costa Mesa • City of Rancho Cucamonga
• City of Hollister • City of Stanton
• City of Huntington Beach • City of Vernon
• City of Irvine
General Plan Safety Elements
Supported the preparation of general plan safety element updates for the following jurisdictions:
• City of Anaheim • City of Rancho Cucamonga
City of Canyon Lake City of Saratoga
City of Encinitas • Town of Hillsborough
City of Laguna Beach • Town of Portola Valley
City of Lancaster San Diego County
City of Loma Linda Mendocino County
City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | A-2 Atlas Planning Solutions

SUZANNE MURRAY
Principal, CEO
Phone: 951-444-9379
Email: [email protected]
Years of Experience: 16
Education/Degrees:
• M.A., Current, Emergency Management/Homeland Security, AMU • M.A., 2008, English, National University
• B.A., 2004, English, University of California Riverside • A.A., 2007, Intelligence Operations, Cochise College, Sierra Vista, AZ • Certificate, 2021, Copyediting, UCSD Extension
TECHNICAL WRITER, EDITOR | RESEARCHER | ANALYST | EDUCATOR Suzanne Murray has authored many classified government documents throughout a 16-year career in the military. Notable documents include research and White Paper composition on Afghanistan tribes and human terrain in Afghanistan and Iraq, and North Korean cyberterrorism threats on United States ports of entry. Additional documents include training manuals for unit training to enhance readiness and training capabilities.

Relevant and Current Project Experience
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Updates
Supported the preparation and updates of Local Hazard Mitigation Plans for the following jurisdictions:
• City of Anaheim City of Loma Linda
• City of Costa Mesa • °
City of Rancho Cucamonga
City of Hollister City of Stanton
• City of Huntington Beach • °
City of Vernon
• City of Irvine
General Plan Safety Elements
Supported the preparation of general plan safety element updates for the following jurisdictions:
• City of Anaheim City of Rancho Cucamonga
: City of Cacion Lake
City of Encinitas Town of Hillsborough
City of Laguna Beach • Town of Portola Valley
City of Lancaster San Diego County
City of Loma Linda • Mendocino County

OTHER RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
United States Army Reserve, Human Intelligence Collector, 2004-Present SAIG, Researcher for Detained Personnel in Bagram Afghanistan, 2011-2013 City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | A-3 Atlas Planning Solutions

DENNIS LARSON
Senior Planner
Phone: 951-444-9379
Years of Experience: 24
Education/Degrees:
• MA, Economics, California State San Diego
• BA, Geography, California State San Diego
HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNER | GIS MAPPING TECHNICAL EXPERT | CLIMATE CHANGE

SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT
Mr. Larson has 18 years of experience in public agency program management, policy research, and technical analysis. His specialties include long-range planning, hazard mitigation, climate resiliency, Geographic Information Services, and economic impact analyses. Dennis helps public agencies and private firms develop and evaluate policies, programs, and strategies with measurable performance impacts.

OTHER RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
: San Diego Unified Port District, Port Master Plan Update, Safety and Resiliency Element San Diego Unified Port District, AB691 SLR Vulnerability Assessment and Coastal Resiliency • San Diego Unified Port District, San Diego Ocean Planning Partnership and Preliminary Assessment Report
• San Diego Regional Climate Collaborative and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Comparing Sea Level Rise Adaptation Strategies in San Diego: An Application of the NOAA Economic Framework
• City of Encinitas, FEMA Benefit-Cost Analysis for Coastal Hazard Resiliency City of San Diego, Otay Mesa Community Plan Update, Public Facilities, Safety, & Services City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | A-4 Atlas Planning Solutions

CRYSTAL STUEVE
Senior Planner
Phone: 951-444-9379
Email: [email protected]
Years of Experience: 16
Education/Degrees:

MA, 2017, Mass Communications & Journalism, Kent State University • BS. 2012, intelligence Management, Henley-Putnam University RESEARCHER | ANALYST | TECHNICAL WRITER AND EDITOR
Crystal Stueve has authored many classified government documents throughout her 19-year career in the Additional documents include training manuals and unit standard operating procedures to enhance unit readiness and training capabilities.

Relevant and Current Project Experience
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Updates
Supported the preparation and updates of Local Hazard Mitigation Plans for the following jurisdictions:

City of Anaheim City of Rancho Cucamonga
• City of Costa Mesa City of Stanton
• City of Hollister • City of Vernon
• City of Huntington Beach
General Plan Safety Elements
Supported the preparation of general plan safety element updates for the following jurisdictions:
• City of Anaheim City of Rancho Cucamonga
City of Encinitas City of Saratoga
City of Lancaster San Diego County
City of Loma Linda • Mendocino County
Emergency Operations Plan Updates
Supported the preparation of emergency operations plan updates for the following jurisdictions:

City of Costa Mesa, City of Loma Linda, City of Rancho Cucamonga, City of Newport Beach, Inyo County

OTHER RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
San Bernardino Police Department, Criminal Investigation Officer/EOC Specialist, 2018-2020 US Army Reserve, Human Intelligence Collector, 2014-Present US Army Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command (Airborne) - Emergency Operations Center Analyst, 2012-2014
United States Army Reserve, Weapons of Mass Destruction Specialist, 2002-2012 City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | A-5 Atlas Planning Solutions

ROBERT JACKSON
Associate Planner
Phone: 951-444-9379
Email: [email protected]
Years of Experience: 3
RESEARCHER | ANALYST
Robert Jackson has worked for Atlas Planning as an assistant planner and has been an integral part in a multitude of projects since joining the team. He has experience in Local Hazard Mitigation Plan document preparation and updates. General Plan Safety Element update research, document review, and composition. While newer to the planning world, he has proven to be a valuable asset to the Atlas Planning Team.

Relevant and Current Project Experience
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Updates
Supported the preparation and updates of Local Hazard Mitigation Plans for the following jurisdictions:
• City of Anaheim, Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
• City of Costa Mesa, Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
• City of Hollister, Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update • City of Huntington Beach Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update • City of Irvine, Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
• City of Loma Linda Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update • City of Rancho Cucamonga Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update • City of Stanton, Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
• City of Vernon, Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
General Plan Safety Elements
Supported the preparation of general plan safety element updates for the following jurisdictions:
• City of Anaheim General Plan Safety Element Update
• City of Canyon Lake Safety Element Update
• City of Encinitas Safety Element Update
City of Laguna Beach General Plan Safety Element Update • City of Lancaster, General Plan Safety Element Update • City of Loma Linda General Plan Safety Element Update City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Safety Element
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element
Town of Hillsborough General Plan Safety Element
• Town of Portola Valley General Plan Safety Element
• San Diego County General Plan Safety Element Update
• Mendocino County General Plan Safety Element Update
City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | A-6 Atlas Planning Solutions
Navigating Preparedness Associates
"Charting A Clear Course"
Lee Rosenberg, CEM
Managing Principal
Years of Experience: 40 years
Education and Certifications
• Certified Emergency Manager (CEM), International Association of Emergency Managers, 2021
• Northwestern University, Master of Engineering Management Professional Summary
Lee Rosenberg is the owner and managing director of Navigating Preparedness Associates. As the company leader, he provides direction to staff who deliver comprehensive emergency preparedness services to the government and industry. With more than 30 years of emergency management, national security, and homeland security experience, Mr. Rosenberg has a broad and deep knowledge of the practical application of operations and policy in these areas. He has a particular focus on hazard mitigation plan development and program implementation.

Mr. Rosenberg led the URS Corporation's Oakland environmental service department and West Coast emergency preparedness practice from 2008 to 2014. He served as a Federal Coordinating Officer for FEMA Region IX from 2006 to 2008, where he provided support to states for numerous presidentially declared disasters. Before working for FEMA, Mr. Rosenberg completed a 30-year career in the US Navy, during which time he served as the commanding officer of a destroyer and as the commander of a large amphibious assault craft base. He is a combat veteran of Operation Desert Storm and retired as a Captain.

Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Updates:
• City of Artesia
• City of Hawthorne,
• City of Lynwood
• Valley County Water District,
• City of Hermosa Beach
• Tulare County MJHMP
2015-2016 - San Francisco Bay Ferry/Water Emergency Transportation Authority, Emergency Response Plan (ERP) and EOP Revision
2006-2008 - FEMA RIX, Disaster Response Operations, Federal Coordinating Officer Director, Joint Field Office, Kiholo Bay Earthquake, Honolulu, HI 2004-2006 - US Navy, Deputy Chief of Staff, Plans and Exercises Division, US Coast Guard Pacific Area
1976-2006 - Captain, US Navy
City of Bradbury Proposal for: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Page | A-7 Atlas Planning Solutions
changing the event to another day/month.

Birthday/Incorporation (July 26th); however, this does not preclude the City Council from and Bradbury's celebration of National Night Out (typically on August 1st) the high heat during the typical July month. The events, and its name, is a combination However, staff has recently fielded numerous requests to change the date of BNO due to points. Ice cream reported 198 and food was approximately 210. counts are based on reports from the food vendors since this is the event's only control- event hit approximately 180. This year, the event had somewhere over 200 people. Event 150 people, which included vendors and residents. Last year (first year post-COVID), the its highest attendance ever. Two events ago (pre-COVID), the event hit approximately 2023 from 6:00pm to 8:00pm. Overall, there were no significant issues, and the City had The City of Bradbury held its annual Bradbury Night Out (BNO) on Thursday, July 27,

SUMMARY
date moving forward.
month change of Bradbury Night Out from late July to mid-late June, and select a new It is recommended that the City Council provide feedback on the City Staff suggested

RECOMMENDATION

3. June Yearly Analysis

2. Weather Analysis
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Sunset Analysis
BRADBURY NIGHT OUT DATE CHANGE SUBJECT:

October 17, 2023 DATE:

Mario Flores, Management Analyst FROM:

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council TO:

Agenda Memo
City of Bradbury
Elizabeth Bruny, Council Member (District 5) BRADBURY
Bruce Lathrop, Council Member (District 4)
Monte Lewis, Council Member (District 2) O F
Richard T. Hale, Mayor Pro Tem (District 1)
Richard Barakat, Mayor (District 3)
a tolerable outside temperature for the BNO event.
each month, it became clear that May and June were the most viable months in terms of had a high temperature of 101 degrees Fahrenheit. After analyzing the temperature for temperature of 95 degrees Fahrenheit. Additionally, the BNO 2023 date of July 27, 2023 average high temperature of 77 degrees Fahrenheit, and July 2023) had an average high 2023) had an average high temperature of 74 degrees Fahrenheit, June (2023) had an to review the daily high temperatures in each respective targeted month of 2023. May were targeted in the Weather Analysis. Once again, City Staff utilized an online almanac rest of the analysis due to inadequate daylight, the months of May, June, and July of 2023 experience at BNO. Since the months of September and October were excluded from the would provide a tolerable outside temperature so patrons can enjoy a comfortable City Staff also conducted a Weather Analysis (Attachment 2) to determine which month Weather Analysis
daylight for the duration of the event.
scheduled from 6:00pm to 8:00pm, September and October will not provide adequate of 6:59pm, and October (2023) has an average sunset time of 6:19pm. With BNO annually in the two-hour event period. The month of September (2023) has an average sunset time was determined that only the months of May, June, and July provided adequate daylight to predict the sunset times for this coming October of 2023. After a thorough analysis, it to review the sunset times in Bradbury for May, June, July, and September of 2023 and a positive event experience and to enhance public safety. An online almanac was utilized outdoor lighting fixtures, adequate daylight from 6:00pm to 8:00pm is important to achieve daylight throughout the duration of the event (6-8pm). Without access to adequate Analysis (Attachment 1) to determine which month would provide the most adequate City Staff began the search for a viable event date change by conducting a Sunset Sunset Analysis
calendar to determine when summer break officially begins.

Another variable that was considered was the neighboring school districts academic outside temperature and with adequate daylight throughout the duration of the event. recommended that the most enjoyable experience of a BNO event will occur in a tolerable during these months based on the variables of daylight (sunset) and weather (heat). It is September, or October. Given this information, City Staff conducted various analyses that viable months to host BNO possibly included May, June, July (status quo), In September's City Council meeting, City Staff was given direction from the City Council

ANALYSIS
late June beginning in 2024.
forward. It is recommended that the City Council select a new date to host BNO in mid- change from late July to mid-late June and give staff direction on a new date moving allows for the providing of any feedback and dialogue on the recommended month This item is a continuation from the August and September City Council meetings and Neighboring School Districts
Hosting the BNO event during the K-12 school year is a major concern, and for good reason- BNO provides a memorable experience for young children. From providing tasty treats like ice cream to eat, to showcasing wild animals for children to view, children enjoy many elements of BNO. Additionally, many of the patrons who attend BNO are children and hosting the event during the K-12 academic school year makes it challenging for them to attend. City Staff determined that the final day for both the Royal Oaks STEAM Academy and Duarte Unified School District is May 24, 2024. This leaves the month of June as the most viable overall month for BNO moving forward.

June Yearly Analysis
With the focus now shifted on June as the most viable month for BNO moving forward, City Staff conducted a June Yearly Analysis (Attachment 3) that takes into account both the weather (high temperature) and sunset time in the previous three years, within the month of June. June 2021 recorded an average high temperature of 88 degrees Fahrenheit and an average sunset time of 8:05pm. June 2022 recorded an average high temperature of 91 degrees Fahrenheit and an average sunset time of 8:05pm. June 2023 recorded an average high temperature of 77 degrees Fahrenheit and an average sunset time of 8:06pm. The previous three years of June have been fairly consistent in terms of sunset. The average high temperatures have been somewhat sporadic in June for the previous three years; however, they are much more tolerable than July. All in all, mid-late June is the most viable time to host BNO based on the variables of weather, daylight, and the local academic calendar.

ATTACHMENT #1
May 2023 Sunset Time

7.59 7.54

7.49 7.44
Time (P.M.)

7.39 Average Sunset Time: 7:49 P.M.

7.34 7.29

7.24 5129/2023
Date
June 2023 Sunset Time

8.14 8.12
.M.) : 8.10
. 8.08
Time (P. 8.06

8.04 Average Sunset Time: 8:06 P.M.

8.02 8.00
6/27/2023
Date
July 2023 Sunset Time

8.16 8.14

8.12 Average Sunset Time: 8:05 P.M.

8.10 Time (P.M.) 8.08

8.06 8.04

8.02 8.00
7/25/2023 7/31/2023
Date
September 2023 Sunset Time

7.40 7.20

7.00 Average Sunset Time: 6:59 P.M.

6.80 Time (P.M.)

6.60 6.40

6.20 6.00
9/1/2023 9/5/2023 9/7/2023 9/15/2023 9/21/2023 9/23/2023 9/25/2023 9/27/2023 9/29/2023 Date
October 2023 Sunset Time

6.40 6.35

6.30 .M.) Average Sunset Time: 6:19 P.M.

6.25 ти 8

6.05 6.00
10/1/2023 10/7/2023 10/13/2023 10/15/2023 10/17/2023 10/23/2023 10/31/2023 Date
ATTACHMENT #2
May 2023 High Temperature
75 69 71 73 74 75 67 73 80 85 86 84 82 84 82 79 81 84 18 18, 74 72 71 72 56 67 63........ 701166, ....65
Temperature (°F)
Average High Temp: 74 °F
Dates
June 2023 High Temperature
110
76 81 80 80 80 85 83 79 80 82 79 78 82 82 82 83 83 84 82 70 68 67 71 71.69
Temperature (°F)
Average High Temp: 77 °F
Dates
July 2023 High Temperature
90 91 90 88 87 84 84 85 92 97 97 96 99 98 g5 10098 100 99 98 96 95 100202101101 98 97 94 96 Temperature (°F) Average High Temp: 95 °F
Dates
ATTACHMENT #3
June 2021 Weather and Sunset
: 100

8.08 ₴
80 Temperature (°F) 8 8 Average High Temp: 88 °F
Average Sunset Time: 8:05 P.M.
6/1/2021 6/3/2021 6/5/2021 6/7/2021 6/9/2021 6/11/2021 6/17/2021 6/19/2021 6/29/2021 Date
-Temperature Sunset
June 2022 Weather and Sunset
100 8.1
3000 ₴
80 800600
60 Temperature (°F) Average High Temp: 91 °F
40 20 Average Sunset Time: 8:05 P.M.
6/1/2022 6/3/2022 6/5/2022 6/7/2022 6/9/2022 6/11/2022 6/19/2022 Date
•Temperature -Sunset
June 2023 Weather and Sunset
100
80 8.06
Temperature (°F) Average High Temp: 77 °F

8.04 Average Sunset Time: 8:06 P.M. 8.02
8 6/13/2023
-Temperature Sunset Time
Richard Barakat, Mayor (District 3)
Richard T. Hale, Mayor Pro Tem (District 1)
Monte Lewis, Council Member (District 2)
CRETE Bruce Cathrop, Council Member (District 4)
BRADBURY Elizabeth Bruny, Council Member (District 5)
City of Bradbury
Agenda Memo
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Mario Flores, Management Analyst
DATE: October 17, 2023
SUBJECT: DISCUSSION ON USE OF CALRECYCLE FUNDS
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Zoning Map with Potential Water Refill Station Locations

2. Photos of Potential Water Refill Station Locations

SUMMARY
The City of Bradbury (City) annually applies for the Cal Recycle Beverage Container Recycling City/County Payment Program and receives $5,000 each year. In the past, there have been challenges in expending these monies, as funds are restricted and may only be utilized to support activities related to container recycling and litter abatement. In previous years, the City expended Cal Recycle funds through a grant program and partnered with surrounding cities. In 2020, water refill stations were added as an eligible activity and would allow the City to use funds to install water refill stations.

As such, the City paid for a water station to be installed in Monrovia Canyon Park, an area greatly affected by the Bobcat Fire. The City also later partnered with the City of Duarte to install a water station on the Royal Oaks path in the City of Duarte.

The City Council may elect to move forward with a grant program once again or choose to install a water refill station in the City. It is recommended that the City Council provide direction on how to move forward with Cal Recycle funds. Should the City Council desire to implement a grant program, staff will release a Request of Grant Proposals and return with any responses. Should the City Council elect to install a water refill station in the City, Staff recommends that the City Council choose the desired location.

Staff will then return to present actual costs of installation based on the pre-identified feasible areas (Attachment 1).

BACKGROUND
The California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act provides funding to cities and counties for beverage container recycling programs. The funding source is the California Redemption Value (CRV) premium that is paid when consumers purchase beverages in glass bottles, cans, and plastic containers. Funding is distributed annually based on a per capita formula. Bradbury is entitled to receive $5,000 each year, and receiving the funds is as simple as completing an online form. Currently, the City has a surplus of these restricted funds in the amount of $9,818.

CalRecycle funds are restricted to the following eligible activities:
• New or existing curbside recycling programs
• Neighborhood drop-off recycling programs
• Public education promoting beverage container recycling • Litter prevention and cleanup where the waste stream includes beverage containers that will be recycled
• Cooperative regional efforts with two or more cities or counties, or both • Other beverage container recycling programs
• Adding Water Refill Stations
• Supporting AB 341 Mandatory Commercial Recycling requirements:
• Infrastructure for businesses to recycle beverage containers o Support for new or existing beverage container recycling programs for multi-family residential dwellings
• Public education and outreach that includes a beverage container recycling component.

In the past, the City partnered with the City of Duarte to sponsor their Earth Day event and with the City of Azusa to sponsor their Discover Club, a pilot environmental program. In 2020, the City used Cal Recycle funds to purchase a water refill station for the City of Monrovia, and later an additional one in partnership with Duarte. The water refill stations were installed at Monrovia Canyon Park to assist with rehabilitation efforts after the Bobcat Fire severely affected the area, and on the Royal Oaks path in the City of Duarte.

ANALYSIS
This year, the City Council can elect to expend Cal Recycle funds through a grant program to partner and help surrounding cities with their environmental programs and events or install a water refill station on one of the City's recreational trails (See Attachments 1 & 2).

If the City Council elects to expend funds through the grant program, the City would release a Request of Grant Proposals to solicit projects from neighboring cities, educational institutions, and non-profit organizations.

Should the City Council desire to move forward with the water refill station installation, the following is a rough estimate of the cost of one (1) station:

Item Estimated Cost
Elker Outdoor ezH2O Upper Bottle Filling Station $4,200 Cal Am Water Service (Meter) $5,000
Installation (traffic control, modification of existing landscape $4,800 and irrigation, installation of a concrete pad/foundation, connection to the water meter, restoration of the area (fencing, minor grading, etc.)
Estimated Total $14,000

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Each year, the City of Bradbury receives $5,000 from CalRecycle. These are restricted funds and cannot be used for General Fund purposes. The City has had ditticulties in the past expending all monies received, which has resulted in a surplus of $9,818.

Should the City Council decide to install water refill stations, $9,818 of the grand total project cost of $14,000 will be covered by Cal Recycle funds and the rest of the cost ($4,182) will be taken from the City's general fund.

Should the City Council decide to move forward with a grant program, it would not have an impact on the City's general fund budget if the Council decides to limit the grant allocation to the amounted $9,818.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council provide direction on how to move forward with Cal Recycle funds. Should the City Council desire to implement a grant program, staff will release a Request of Grant Proposals and return with any responses. Should Council elect to install a water refill station in the City, Staff recommends that the City Council choose the desired location. Staff will then return to present actual costs of installation based on the pre-identified feasible areas.

ATTACHMENT #1

CITY OF MONROVIA (ANGELES NATIONAL FOREST)

CITY OF

BRADBURY

OF OFFICIAL

MONROVIA
A-5

CITY ZONING
MAP
DATE: JULY 27, 2012
LEGEND:

ZONING GROSS AREA PUBLIC STREET LACOFCD NET AREA
R-7,500 8 AC
R-20,000 AC 5.50 AC 1.5 AC 51.0
195.0
794 1.79 AC 792.0
Open Spoce 52 AC 52.0 AC
1,216 AC 177A 5.29 AC 1,193.0 AC
Specific Pian
TE 1
BRADBURY I A-1 A-1
CITY OF MONROVIAl CITY OF
* \ACAD \Bradbury Miac \City Bose Sheets \BRAD_ZONING _OFFICIAL_2012. das ATTACHMENT #2
Location No. 1
Mount Olive Drive - 200' southerly of Woodlyn Lane
Google Earth
Location No. 2
Mount Olive Drive - At lower traffic calming
Google Earth
I©2021 Soogle
Location No. 3
Mount Olive Drive - At Mount Olive Lane
Google Earth
P6U2321 Gotgle
Location No. 4
Mount Olive Drive - At Gardi Street
Google Eartih
I@ 2029 Google
Location No. 5
Royal Oaks Drive North - Easterly End
Google Earth J
2021 Google
Location No. 6
Royal Oaks Drive North - At Braewood Drive
Google Earth
2021 Susale
Location No. 7
Royal Oaks Drive North - Westerly End
Google Earth
2021 Google
Location No. 8
Lemon Avenue - At north trailhead
Google Earth
162821 Gangle

CORPORATE
JLY 26. 105
Richard Barakat, Mayor (District 3)
Dick Hale, Mayor Pro Tem (District 1)
Montgomery Lewis, Council Member (District 2)
Bruce Lathrop, Council Member (District 4)
BRADBURY Elizabeth Bruny, Council Member (District 5)
City of Bradbury
Agenda Memo
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Kevin Kearney, City Manager
DATE: October 17, 2023
SUBJECT: DISCUSSION ON LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
ATTACHMENTS: 1) June 20, 2023 Minutes
2) Current LASD Contract

SUMMARY
This item prompts a discussion on the City of Bradbury's law enforcement services. It is recommended that the City Council direct Staff on how to proceed.

During the June 20, 2023 regularly scheduled meeting, the City Council elected to discuss the potential of switching law enforcement services from the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department to the Monrovia Police Department (ATTACHMENT #1). Since this time, Staff has been in discussions with the City of Monrovia about their interests in servicing Bradbury. After a few conversations, the Monrovia Police Department is initialiy both willing and able to service Bradbury. To date, there have been no studies conducted on Monrovia's service level costs, but Monrovia is willing to move forward with such a study if Bradbury is desiring one.

Should the City Council desire more information on a potential switch in services, it is recommended that the City Council continue this item so that the Monrovia Police Department can attend an upcoming meeting to present additional information.

FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AGENDA ITEM #
ATTACHMENT #1

BRADBURY

REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES
Regular Meeting of the City of Bradbury City Council
Tuesday, June 20, 2023
Bradbury Civic Center
CALL TO ORDER - The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Bradbury was called to order by Mayor Lathrop at 7:00pm followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.

ROLL CALL:

PRESENT: Mayor Lathrop, Mayor Pro Tem Barakat, Councilmembers Lewis, Bruny & Hale.

STAFF: City Manager Kearney, City Attorney Reisman & Assistant City Clerk Jensen.

CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION: According to Bradbury Municipal Code Section 2.01.060, annually in June, the City Council reorganizes and from its members, selects a new Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem. Candidates for Mayor Pro Tem must self-nominate by writing a statement of intent. City Manager Kearney received such writing from Councilmember Richard Hale.

Councilmember Hale motioned to appoint Mayor Pro Tem Barakat to Mayor which was seconded by Councilmember Lewis and carried unanimously. Mayor Barakat motioned to appoint Councilmember Richard Hale to Mayor Pro Tem. Councilmember Bruny seconded the motion which was carried unanimously.

NEW ROLL CALL:

PRESENT: Mayor Barakat, Mayor Pro Tem Hale, Councilmembers Lewis, Bruny & Lathrop.

APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Councilmember Lewis made a motion to approve the agenda and it was seconded by Councilmember Lathrop. It was the consensus of the Council to proceed.

City Attorney Reisman stated that he was aware of no potential conflicts.

PUBLIC COMMENT ABOUT ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA: - No public comments.

ACTION ITEMS

1. Consent Calendar Approval
Minutes: Regular Meeting of May 16, 2023
• Resolution No. 23-07: Demands & Warrants for May 2023 • Monthly Investment Report for the month of May 2023
• Resolution No. 23-08: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Bradbury, California, Designating Diane Jensen as City Clerk
Resolution No. 23-09: Approval of Gann Appropriation Limit for FY 2023-24 • Reappointment of Public Safety Committee Seats
APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR: Mayor Pro Tem Hale made a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Councilmember Lathrop seconded the motion. which was carried by the following roll call:

AYES: Mayor Barakat, Mayor Pro Tem Hale, Councilmembers, Lewis, Lathrop & Bruny.

NOES: None.

2. Award of Bid - Lemon Avenue Trail Project
Bids for the Lemon Avenue Trail project were opened on May 2, 2023 with SDC Engineering Inc. being the lowest responsible bidder. Three members of the Public spoke to the Councilmembers concerning their requests for indemnification language. a. Brad Selby, 1442 Lemon Avenue, provided a letter (see attachment) b. Dan Hyde at 1462 Lemon Avenue
c. Niveen Elguindi at 1550 Lemon Avenue_.

Due to a variety of unresolved indemnification issues, it was recommended that no decisions be made tonight but to wait about 30 days or until the next City Council meeting on July 18. 2023. Mayor Pro Tem Hale made the motion and Councilmember Lathrop seconded it

3. Fiscal Year 2023-24 Annual Rate Adjustment for Solid Waste Collection & Recycling Because Burrtec's new rates for trash, recycling, manure and green waste were scheduled to increase on July 1, 2023, Burrtec representative Michael Heftman explained the increases. The increases are CPI-based at around 7.74%. An example being a 90-Gallon Trashcan pre-July 1st was $27.95/mo. and after is $32.07/mo.

SB 1383 requires every jurisdiction to provide organic waste collection services to residents; however, due to the size of the City of Bradbury, this regulation does not apply. AB 661 went into effect January 1, 2023. This piece of legislation states that paper products like toilet paper and paper towels must be at least 40% recycled content. Napkins 45% and Facial tissues 10%.

Councilman Lathrop made a motion to approve the new rates commencing July 1, 2023. Mayor Pro Tem Hale seconded the motion, which passed 5:0.

4. Adoption of Resolution No. 23-10: Adoption of Budget for Fiscal Year 2022-2023, Resolution No. 23-11: Allocating the City of Bradbury's Citizen Option for Public Safety (COPS) Funds, and Resolution No. 23-12: Allocation the City of Bradbury's SB 1 Funds.

The budget for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 was presented and explain by City Manager Kearney at last month's City Council meeting. Tonight's meeting was to answer any questions and approve. Because there were no questions, the Council agreed with Staff's recommendation to approve the budget.

Mayor Pro Tem Hale made a motion to adopt and approve Resolution No. 23-10, Resolution No. 23-11 and Resolution No. 23-12. Councilmember Lathrop seconded the motion.

5. City Council Liaisons for Fiscal year 2023/2024 and Consideration of Resolution No. 23-13 Pertaining to the Appointments to the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments The City Council decided to maintain all of the same liaisons from 2022/2023 with the exception where those specified a mayoral designation. These included LA County City Selection, LA County Sanitation District and So. Cal Joint Powers Insurance Authority. No other changes were made to the current liaison appointments.

City Council adopted Resolution No. 23-13 with a motion from Mayor Pro Tem Hale and a second to that motion from Councilmember Lathrop.

6. Matters from the City Manager - City is ready for a successful Bradbury Night Out event. Kevin stated he had received questions regarding subdividing without specifics at the 1901 Royal Oaks property.

1. Matters from the City Attorney - Nothing.

8. Matters from the City Council -
Mayor Barakat - "Penney Property" - Can debris can be pushed back? Mayor Pro Tem Hale -
Councilmember Lathrop - No comments.

Councilmember Lewis - No Comments.

Councilmember Bruny - No Comments.

9. ITEMS FOR FUTURE AGENDAS -
Re-Look at Monrovia to bid a police force.

Finalize Lemon Trail project.

CLOSED SESSION
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION @ 8:23pm: Councilmembers, City Attorney Reisman and City Manager Kearney discussed the following:

Conference with Legal Counsel - Pending Litigation
Pending Litigation pursuant to Government Code sec. 54956.9, (a) LAFCO Annexation No. 2021-10 to the City of Bradbury
Conference with Legal Counsel - Pending Litigation
Pending Litigation pursuant to Government Code sec. 54956.9, (d)(1) Grow Monrovia v. City of Bradbury - L.A. Superior Court Case No. 23STCP00128 Public Employee Performance Evaluation - Government Code Section 54957 (b)(4) City Manager Evaluation (City Manager not present during this discussion) Agency Negotiator: Cary S. Reisman, City Attorney
Unrepresented Employee: City Manager
Authority Gov't Code Section: 54957.6
REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION - At 8:58pm, Closed Session ended - Attorney Reisman reported on the two pending litigations stating the session was "informative" only and no formal votes were taken. Vote taken regarding City Manager's annual salary increase to $190,000.00 retroactive to May 2023.

AYES: Councilmember Lathrop, Councilmember Bruny and Mayor Pro Tem Hale.

NAYS: Mayor Barakat and Councilmember Lewis.

ADJOURNMENT - At 9:02pm, Mayor Barakat moved to adjourn the meeting and all of the other Councilmembers were in favor. The Regular City Council meeting was adjourned to Bradbury Civic Center, 600 Winston Avenue, Bradbury, CA 91008 on Thursday, July 6th for a Special Study Session. Meeting at 6:30 pm.

SIGNED BY:

Qu Backet 08.15.2023
RICHARD G. BARAKAT, MAYOR DATE

CITY OF BRADBURY
ATTEST:

08.15.2023

DIANE JENSEN, CITY CLERK DATE

CITY OF BRADBURY
ATTACHMENT #2

ATTACHMENT A

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT

CONTRACT CITY LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
SERVICE LEVEL AUTHORIZATION (SH-AD 575)
CITY: Bradbury FISCAL YEAR: 2023-2024 EFFECTIVE DATE: 7/1/2023

DEPUTY SHERIFF SERVICE UNIT

SERVICE ESTIMATED TOTAL HABILITY ANNUAL HOURS ANNUAL HOURS ANNUAL MINUTES PERSONNEL

RELIEF FACTOR ANNUAL RATE
CODE ANNUAL COST PER SERVICE UNIT SCHEDULED. SCHEDULED REQUIRED Deputy Sheriff 56-Hour Unit 307 0.25 0.25 0.00 $ 499,296.00 $ 124,824.00 $ 14,978.88 139,802.88 2,920 730 43,800 0.408

0.00 0.000

DEPUTY SHERIFF SERVICE UNIT (BONUS)

SERVICE ESTIMATED TOTAL LIABILITY TOTAL ANNUAL COST ANNUAL HOURS ANNUAL HOURS ANNUAL MINUTES PERSONNEL

RELIEF FACTOR ANNUAL RATE

CODE ANNUAL COST W/HABITY PER SERVICE UNIT SCHEDULED SCHEDULED REQUIRED

0.00 0.000

GROWTH/GRANT DEPUTY UNIT

SERVICE ESTIMATED TOTAL LIABILITY TOTAL ANNUA ANNUAL HOURS ANNUAL HOURS ANNUAL MINUTES PERSONNEL

RELIEF FACTOR CODE ANNUAL RATE

ANNUAL COST PER SERVICE UNIT SCHEDULED SCHEDULED REQUIRED

0.00 0.000

0.00 0.000
seneses

0.00 0.000

SUPPLEMENTAL POSITIONS

SERVICE ESTIMATED TOTAL LIABILITY TOTALANNUAL COST ANNUAL HOURS ANNUAL HOURS ANNUAL MINUTES PERSONNEC

RELIEF FACTOR ANNUAL RATE
CODE ANNUAL COST PER SERVICE UNIT! SCHEDULED SCHEDULED REQUIRED

0.00 0.000

0.00 0.000
Estimated Cost for Service Units: $ 124,824.00 Total Liability (12%): $ 14,978.88 Estimated Subtotal: S 139,802.88 Public Safety Equipment Cost (See page 3): $
Estimated Total Annual Cost: 139,802.88
The terms of this Service Level Authorization (SH-AD 575) will remain in effect until a subsequent SH-AD 575 is signed and received by LASD.

Notwithstanding, annual rates shall be revised annually per Sections 8.2 and 11.3 of the MLESA.

LASD Approval By: Report Prepared By:

Men 4/28/23
Jorac Rudy Sanchez 5/29/2023

UNIT COMMANDER NAME SIGNATURE SERGEANT DATE
City Approval By:
"I ertify that I am authorized to make this compairment on pehalf of the Clty." Processed at CLEB By:
bein Learney 6/26/23 RUDy SANCHEZ
SIGNATURE 6/30/2023

CITY OFFICIAL NAME SERGEANT DATE
SH-AD 575 (REV. 04/18) Page 1 of 5

ATTACHMENT A

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT

CONTRACT CITY LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
SERVICE LEVEL AUTHORIZATION (SH-AD 575)

DEPLOYMENT OF PERSONNEL
City: Bradbury Fiscal Year:2023-2024 _ Effective Date: _ 7/1/2023

GENERAL LAW TRAFFIC LAW

SERVICE UNIT TOTAL UNITS MOTOR TEAM TOTAL UNITS
PURCHASED SAD D.B.

EM AM PM PM DEP LEADER ASSIGNED

DEPUTY SHERIFF
Non-Relief 0.00 0.00
40-Hour Unit 0.00
56-Hour Unit 0.25 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.025 0.025 0.25
70-Hour Unit 0.00 0.00
Motor (Non-Relief) 0.00 0.00

DEPUTY BONUS
Non-Relief 0.00 0.00
40-Hour Unit 0.00 0.00
56-Hour Unit 0.00 0.00
70-Hour Unit 0.00 0.00

GROWTH DEPUTY
Deputy 0.00 0.00
SAD 0.00 0.00
Bonus I 0.00 0.00
Motor (Non-Relief) 0.00 0.00

GRANT DEPUTY
Deputy 0.00 0.00
SAD 0.00

0.00 Bonus I 0.00 0.00
Motor (Non-Relief) 0.00 0.00
Routine City Helicopter Billing Agreement YES NO 50
License Detail - Business License & Renewal Applications YES NO M License Detail - Acts on Violations Observed within the City YES NO $ S.T.A.R. Deputy Program YES NO E
Other Supplemental Services YES NO C
NOTE: License Detail is billed on an hourly basis and billed monthly as service is provided Sworn
Lieutenant Sergeant Bonus Deputy Motor Deputy SAD Total Deputy
Hours 730 730
Minutes 43,800 43,800
Personnel 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.408 0.000 0.408
Civilian
SSO LET/CSA/CA/PCO Clerical Total
Hours
° °
Minutes 0
Personnel 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
BILLING MEMO REQUIRED AND SUBMITTED: YESZ? NOO NADI
(PERSONNEL TRANSACTION REQUEST) "PTR" REQUIRED AND SUBMITTED: NOD NAZ Initials ORGANIZATIONAL CHART REQUIRED AND SUBMITTED: No D NIA L DUTY STATEMENT REQUIRED AND SUBMITTED: NO D NA T City Official:

SMS DEPLOYMENT CONTRACT UPDATED: NO D
MINUTE PROGRAM IN RAPS UPDATED: NO O N/AD Unit Commander:

SH-AD 575 (REV. 03/22) Page 2 of 5

ATTACHMENT A

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT

CONTRACT CITY LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
SERVICE LEVEL AUTHORIZATION (SH-AD 575)

PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT
CITY: _ Bradbury FISCAL YEAR: 2023-2024

START-UP VEHICLE

VEHICLE TYPE YEAR SERVICE CODE RATE TOTAL COST

EQUIPMENT

MDC TYPE YEAR SERVICE CODE RATE TOTAL COST
ALPR WITH INSTALL YEAR SERVICE CODE # RATE TOTAL COST
Total Public Safety Equipment Cost: $
Initials
City Official:

Unit Commander:

SH-AD 575 (REV. 03/22) Page 3 of 5

ATTACHMENT B
Fiscal Year: 2023-2024

CONTRACT CITY LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT

MASTER RATE SHEET
Liability Rate: 12.0%
DSSU Rates
Rank Relief Factor Annual Rate Service Code
Deputy Sheriff Non-Relief $ 324,218 310
Deputy Sheriff 40-Hour Unit $ 356,640 306
Deputy Sheriff 56-Hour Unit 499,296 307
Deputy Sheriff 70-Hour Unit 624,120 308
Special Assignment Deputy Non-Relief 324,218 278
Catalina Deputy Non-Relief 295,847 324
DSSU Bonus I Rates
Rank Relief Factor Annual Rate Service Code
Deputy Sheriff, Bonus I Non-Relief $ 348,030 305
Deputy Sheriff, Bonus I 40-Hour Unit 382,833 301
Deputy Sheriff, Bonus I 56-Hour Unit $ 535,966 302
Deputy Sheriff, Bonus I 70-Hour Unit 669,957 303
Growth/Grant Deputy Rates
Rank Relief Factor Annual Rate Service Code
Growth Deputy Generalist Non-Relief 226,605 335
Growth Deputy Generalist 40-Hour Unit 264,221 573
Growth Deputy Generalist 56-Hour Unit $ 369,819 582
Growth Deputy Generalist 70-Hour Unit S 462.274 583
Growth Special Assignment Deputy Non-Relief 226,605 204 Growth Deputy Bonus I Non-Relief 246,740 336
Growth Motor Deputy Non-Relief $ 244,174 424
Grant Deputy Generalist Non-Relief $ 226,605 386
Grant Special Assignment Deputy Non-Relief S 226,605 312 Grant Deputy Bonus I Non-Relief $ 246,740 384
Grant Motor Deputy Non-Relief 244,174 422
Supplemental Rates
Rank Relief Factor Annual Rate Service Code
Captain Non-Relief $ 448,565 321
Lieutenant Non-Relief $ 354,112 342
Sergeant, Patrol Non-Relief $ 377,917 631
Sergeant, Supplemental Non-Relief $ 298,507 353
Motor Sergeant Non-Relief $ 314,708 348
Watch Deputy Non-Relief $ 242,476 354
Motor Deputy Non-Relief $ 324,218 305A
Community Services Assistant (w/ veh) Non-Relief 79,105 325 Community Services Assistant (w/out veh) Non-Relief 78,006 327 Crime Analyst Non-Relief 162,211 329
Custody Assistant Non-Relief 132,846 331
Forensic ID Specialist I| Non-Relief 200,989 356
Information Systems Analyst I Non-Relief 176,380 332
Senior Information Systems Analyst Non-Relief 230,769 334 Intermediate Clerk Non-Relief 87,140 338
Law Enforcement Technician (w/out veh) Non-Relief AKARAAA 119,186 339 Law Enforcement Technician (w/ veh) Non-Relief 120,202 340 Operations Assistant / Non-Relief 115,142 343
Operations Assistant Il Non-Relief 143,042 344
Operations Assistant III Non-Relief 163,826 345
Secretary V Non-Relief 124,601 346
Security Assistant Non-Relief 65,982 362
Security Officer Non-Relief $ 102,289 347
Station Clerk II Non-Relief 108,540 351
Supervising Station Clerk Non-Relief 131,222 352
Skynight Observer Non-Relief 348,030 349
Master Rate Sheet Page 4 of 5

CONTRACT CITY LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT

MASTER RATE SHEET
Vehicle & Equipment Rates
Start-Up Vehicle Year Annual Rate Service Code
B/W Patrol - Ford Explorer PIU Hybrid AWD 2023-2024 105,841 378 B/W Tahoe 2WD 2023-2024 102,552 399
B/W Motorcycle 2023-2024 $ 65,292 381
Solid Patrol Vehicle with Cage (SAO Sergeant/Detectives) 2023-2024 100,339 118A Solid Patrol Vehicle without Cage (SAO Sergeant/Detectives) 2023-2024 98,168 118B Ford Escape SUV Hybrid (White Fleet - CSA, SSO, LET) 2023-2024 65,951 203 Ford Explorer PIU Hybrid (Street Package - Executive) 2023-2024 80,689 201 Ford F-150 Police Responder BW 2023-2024 108,211 205
2023-2024 114,050 593
Equipment Year Annual Rate Service Code
MDC New Purchase, Data & Maintenance - CF-31 Year 1 8,785 198 MDC New Purchase, Data & Maintenance - GETAC V110 Year 1 8,389 164 MDC Data & Maintenance Only Year 2+ $ 1,685 595
ALPR New Install 1st Year (5yr Program) Year 1 $ 5,000 680 ALPR System 2nd Year Year 2 $ 5,000 680A
ALPR System 3rd Year Year 3 $ 5,000 680B
ALPR System 4th Year Year 4 $ 4,650 680C
ALPR System 5th Year Year 5 $ 4,650 680D
Annual revised rates shall be readjusted annually per Sections 8.2 and 11.3 of the MLESA.

Page 5 of 5 ends

Bradbury City CouncilOctober 17, 2023

Bradbury City Council
October 17, 2023