Agenda packet — Brea City Council, October 7, 2025 (part 1 of 3)

City Council and Successor Agency
to the Brea Redevelopment
Agency Agenda
Closed Session - 5:30 p.m.

Study Session - 6:00 p.m.

General Session - 7:00 p.m.

Tuesday, October 7, 2025, 7:00 PM

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1 Civic Center Circle
Brea, California 92821
Blair Stewart, Mayor Cecilia Hupp, Mayor Pro Tem Christine Marick, Council Member Marty Simonoff, Council Member Steven Vargas, Council Member This agenda contains a brief general description of each item Council will consider. The City Clerk has on file copies of written documentation relating to each item of business on this Agenda available for public inspection.

Contact the City Clerk’s Office at (714) 990-7756 or view the Agenda and related materials on the City’s website at www.cityofbrea.gov. Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office at 1 Civic Center Circle, Brea, CA during normal business hours. Such documents may also be available on the City’s website subject to staff’s ability to post documents before the meeting.

Procedures for Addressing the Council
The Council encourages interested people to address this legislative body by making a brief presentation on a public hearing item when the Mayor calls the item or address other items under Matters from the Audience. State law generally prohibits the City Council from responding to or acting upon matters not listed on this agenda.

The Council encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons the opportunity to speak, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. Council rules prohibit clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. Please silence all cell phones and other electronic equipment while the Council is in session. Thank you.

Written comments may be submitted in advance of the meeting by emailing [email protected].

Written comments received by 3 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be provided to the Council, will be made available to the public at the meeting, and will be included in the official record of the meeting.

Special Accommodations
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (714) 990-7757. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable City staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. (28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II) Important Notice
The City of Brea shows both live broadcasts and replays of City Council Meetings on Brea Cable Channel 3 and over the Internet at www.cityofbrea.gov. Your attendance at this public meeting may result in the recording and broadcast of your image and/or voice as previously described.

1. CLOSED SESSION - EXECUTIVE CONFERENCE ROOM 3RD FLOOR - 5:30 P.M.

1.A. Call to Order/Roll Call

1.B. Public Comment

1.C. Public Employee Performance Evaluation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b).

Title: City Attorney

1.D. Conference with City's Labor Negotiator Pursuant to Government Code §54957.6 Regarding the Brea Management Association (Non -Safety); Brea City Employees' Association (BCEA); Administrative and Professional Employees' Association (APEA); Brea Fire Association (BFA); Brea Fire Management Association (BFMA); Brea Police Association (BPA); and the Brea Police Management Association (BPMA); Executive and Part-Time Employees - Kristin Griffith, Negotiator.

2. STUDY SESSION - EXECUTIVE CONFERENCE ROOM 3RD FLOOR - 6:00 P.M.

2.A. Call to Order/Roll Call

2.B. Public Comment

2.C. Clarify Regular Meeting Topics

2.D. Comprehensive User Fee Study Update

2.E. Laurel Elementary School Circulation & Safety Assessment

2.F. Council Member Reports/Requests

2.G. Study Session Adjournment

3. GENERAL SESSION - COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLAZA LEVEL - 7:00 P.M.

3.A. Call to Order/Roll Call

3.B. Pledge of Allegiance: Boy Scout Troop 707

3.C. Invocation: Pastor Dan Crane, Formation Church

3.D. Presentation: OC Gun Buyback Program

3.E. Report - Prior Study Session

3.F. Community Announcements

3.G. Matters from the Audience

3.H. Response to Public Inquiries

4. PUBLIC HEARING
This portion of the meeting is for matters that legally require an opportunity for public input.

Audience participation is encouraged and is limited to 5 minutes per speaker.

4.A. Ordinance Establishing Standards and Procedures for Creating Economic Development Programs and Incentives, and Adding Title 17 “Economic Development” to the Brea City Code — 1. Waive full reading of and introduce Ordinance No. 1266 titled “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Brea Establishing Standards and Procedures for Creating Economic Development Programs and Incentives, and Adding Title 17 “Economic Development” to the Brea City Code;
— 2. Approve a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Exemption Determination; and — 3. Schedule adoption of the aforementioned Ordinance at the October 21, 2025 City Council meeting. There is no impact to the General Fund.

5. CONSENT CALENDAR
The City Council/Successor Agency approves all Consent Calendar matters with one motion unless Council/Agency or Staff requests further discussion of a particular item. Items of concern regarding Consent Calendar matters should be presented during “Matters from the Audience."

5.A. September 16, 2025 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes — 1. Approve.

5.B. Accept a $65,000 Office of Traffic Safety Selective Traffic Enforcement Program Grant Award for Traffic Safety Operations
— 1. Accept an Office of Traffic Safety Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (OTSSTEP) Grant Award which funds best practice strategies to be conducted to reduce the number of persons killed and injured in crashes involving alcohol and other primary crash factors, in the amount of $65,000, for the one-year grant period which begins October 1, 2025, and ends September 30, 2026. There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

5.C. September 12, 19, and 26 City Disbursement Registers — 1. Receive and file.

6. ADMINISTRATIVE ANNOUNCEMENTS

6.A. City Manager

6.B. City Attorney

6.C. Council Requests

7. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS

7.A. Council Announcements

8. ADJOURNMENT

8.A. Meeting Adjournment
Date Posted: October 2, 2025
CITYof BREA
Communication
October 7, 2025
Item No. 2D.

Comprehensive User Fee Study Update

TO PREPARED BY
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Alicia Brenner, Budget Manager

DEPARTMENT HEAD APPROVAL CITY MANAGER APPROVAL
Monica Lo, Administrative Services Director Kristin Griffith, City Manager

RECOMMENDATION

1. Review and consideration of the City’s Comprehensive User Fee Study, including the proposed changes and additions to user fees as outlined in Exhibit A; and

2. Provide direction on scheduling a public hearing to solicit public input, including consideration of a resolution to approve user fees based on the City’s Comprehensive User Fee Study.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
In March 2024, the City Council awarded a contract to Willdan Financial Services (Willdan) to conduct a Comprehensive User Fee Study (User Fee Study) and Cost Allocation Plan to determine appropriate fee levels for the various services provided by the City. It is considered a financial best management practice for local agencies to periodically review and update their User Fee schedules to ensure alignment with service delivery costs.

Historically, staff have reviewed and considered user fee changes and additions as part of the budget process, however, fee methodologies have not always been applied consistently across departments. Local agencies, including the City of Brea, adopt user fees to help recover the cost of providing services or programs to individuals or businesses. The primary objective of a user fee is to ensure that the cost of a service benefiting a specific individual or business is borne by the recipient, rather than being borne by the community as a whole. Therefore, the objective of a user fee is to recover a portion, up to but not exceeding 100% of the cost of providing the service, from those who directly benefit from it.

The prior user fee study was initiated in October 2015 with a final fee adoption by the City Council on September 18, 2018. The prior comprehensive user fee study focused solely on development-related user fees, which only included user fees from the Planning, Building, Fire, and Public Works Departments. The current study will provide an overall review and evaluation of all the City’s issued user fees.

On September 16, 2025, the City Council received a report and presentation on the City’s User Fee Study. The presentation, delivered by the City’s user fee consultant, Willdan Financial Services, highlighted key elements of the study, including its purpose, process, methodology, and any policy considerations and recommendations provided by the City departments and/or user fee group.

Following the presentation, the City Council requested additional time and information to evaluate each proposed user fee change. Specifically, the Council recommended categorizing the user fees based on the status of each proposed change. User fees that remain deposit-based, or are recommended to be decreased, or remain unchanged; be omitted from the user fee list to streamline discussion this evening.

The user fee list (Exhibit A) is sorted based upon the following user fee status:

User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fees - For less complex development projects, these are user fees that are recommended to shift from a deposit based to a flat fee structure to streamline the collection process for the applicant and the City.

New User Fees Proposed - These are recommended user fees to be added for services that provide benefit to an individual or group.

Restructured User Fees Proposed as New - These are recommended user fees that are currently being charged; however, the methodology of the fee structure is recommended to change to streamline the collection process for the applicant and the City. For the City's User Fee Study, these user fees are considered "new" but may not be a new service to the applicant.

User Fees Proposed to be Increased - These are recommended user fees that are proposed to increase per the City's Comprehensive User Fee Study.

For additional information, the City's User Fee Study is provided as Exhibit B and supports the proposed changes and additions being presented.

FISCAL IMPACT
Cost Recovery
While the update to the user fees will have a fiscal impact in the form of additional revenue, it is important to note that the revenue is not intended to support new services. Rather, the revenue is intended to offset the costs of providing existing services that are eligible for cost recovery through user fees.

Recovering the costs of providing fee-related services plays a critical role in maintaining the City’s fiscal health and its ability to meet service level expectations. When a fee is set to achieve 100% cost recovery, the full cost of the service is borne by the individual receiving it. When a fee recovers less than the full cost, the remaining portion is subsidized by another City revenue source – most commonly, the City’s General Fund – to support the delivery of the individualized service.

Attachments
Exhibit A - Proposed User Fee List by Status.pdf
Exhibit B - User Fee Study.pdf

USER FEE LIST
(INCLUDES NEW USER FEES PROPOSED; RESTRUCTURED USER FEES AS NEW; USER FEES CONVERTED FROM DEPOSIT BASED TO FLAT FEE Sort
Item No. in
Fee Study User Group/Dept Status Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee $ Δ 104 27 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Mass/Rough Grading Plan Check - Initial Fee Includes 3 reviews New Per Sheet $1,393.07 0% $1,393.00 flat NA 105 28 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Mass/Rough Grading Plan Check - 4th and subsequent reviews New Per Sheet $464.36 12% $410.00 flat NA 106 29 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Precise Grading Plan Check - Initial Fee Includes 3 reviews New Per Sheet $2,371.10 0% $2,371.00 flat NA 107 30 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Precise Grading Plan Check - 4th and subsequent reviews New Per Sheet $790.37 23% $610.00 flat NA 108 31 Building
p
Fee Mass/Rough Grading Inspection - 0 - 100 CY Deposit based $736.28 0% $736.00 flat NA 109 32 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Mass/Rough Grading Inspection - 101-1,000 CY New Each additional 100 CY
over 100 CY (prorated per $2,617.89 0% $2,617.00 flat NA 110 33 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Mass/Rough Grading Inspection - 1,001 - 10,000 CY New Each additional 1000
CY(prorated per CY -
$427) $7,199.19 0% $7,199.00 flat NA
111 34 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Mass/Rough Grading Inspection - 10,001- 100,000 CY New each additional 10,000 CY
(prorated per CY $391.00) $12,434.97 0% $12,434.00 flat NA 112 35 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Mass/Rough Grading Inspection - >100,000 CY Plus $ 8,919.00 ( New each additional 10,000 CY
or portion thereof over
100,00 CY (prorated per
cubic yard $338.00). $17,997.98 0% $17,997.00 flat NA
148 71 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings (Including ADU's) - 0 - 999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $3,743.66 0% $3,743.00 flat NA 149 72 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings (Including ADU's) - 1000 -1,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $4,339.78 0% $4,339.00 flat NA 150 73 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings - 2000 -2,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $4,982.66 0% $4,982.00 flat NA 151 74 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings - 3000 -3,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $5,558.20 0% $5,558.00 flat NA 152 75 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings - 4000 -4,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $6,322.74 0% $6,322.00 flat NA 153 76 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings - 5,000 -6,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $7,005.73 0% $7,005.00 flat NA 154 77 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings - 7,000 -8,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $8,752.74 0% $8,752.00 flat NA 155 78 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings - 9,000+ sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New NA NA To be determined by the
Building Official flat NA
157 80 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings (Including ADU's) - 0 - 999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $4,848.39 0% $4,848.00 flat NA 158 81 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings (Including ADU's) - 1000 -1,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $5,280.88 0% $5,280.00 flat NA 159 82 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings - 2000 -2,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $7,069.10 0% $7,069.00 flat NA 160 83 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings - 3000 -3,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $7,644.64 0% $7,644.00 flat NA

Page 1 of 13 ends

USER FEE LIST
(INCLUDES NEW USER FEES PROPOSED; RESTRUCTURED USER FEES AS NEW; USER FEES CONVERTED FROM DEPOSIT BASED TO FLAT FEE Sort
Item No. in
Fee Study User Group/Dept Status Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee $ Δ 161 84 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings - 4000 -4,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $8,314.67 0% $8,314.00 flat NA 162 85 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings - 5,000 -6,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $9,206.32 0% $9,206.00 flat NA 163 86 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings - 7,000 -8,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $10,953.32 0% $10,953.00 flat NA 164 87 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings - 9,000+ sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New NA NA To be determined by the
Building Official flat NA
166 89 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings (Including ADU's) - 0 - 999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $7,325.85 0% $7,325.00 flat NA 167 90 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings (Including ADU's) - 1000 -1,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $7,823.71 0% $7,823.00 flat NA 168 91 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings - 2000 -2,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $9,022.82 0% $9,022.00 flat NA 169 92 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings - 3000 -3,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $10,699.90 0% $10,699.00 flat NA 170 93 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings - 4000 -4,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $11,722.51 0% $11,722.00 flat NA 171 94 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings - 5,000 -6,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $12,745.13 0% $12,745.00 flat NA 172 95 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings - 7,000 -8,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $14,504.52 0% $14,504.00 flat NA 173 96 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
One and Two Family Dwellings - 9,000+ sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New NA NA To be determined by the
Building Official flat NA
175 98 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Tenant Improvement - 0 - 1,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $3,598.80 0% $3,598.00 flat NA 176 99 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Tenant Improvement - 2,000 - 4,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $4,356.34 0% $4,356.00 flat NA 177 100 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Tenant Improvement - 5,000 - 9,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $5,499.49 0% $5,499.00 flat NA 178 101 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Tenant Improvement - 10,000 - 24,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $7,388.60 0% $7,388.00 flat NA 179 102 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Tenant Improvement - 25,000 - 49,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $8,307.54 0% $8,307.00 flat NA 180 103 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Tenant Improvement - 50,000 - 49,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $9,262.36 0% $9,262.00 flat NA 181 104 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Tenant Improvement - 50,000 - 75,000 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $10,378.52 0% $10,378.00 flat NA 182 105 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Tenant Improvement - Over 75,000 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New NA NA To be determined by the
Building Official flat NA
184 107 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Tenant Improvement - 0 - 1,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $4,110.10 0% $4,110.00 flat NA 185 108 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Tenant Improvement - 2,000 - 4,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $5,010.81 0% $5,010.00 flat NA 186 109 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Tenant Improvement - 5,000 - 9,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $6,522.11 0% $6,522.00 flat NA

Page 2 of 13 ends

USER FEE LIST
(INCLUDES NEW USER FEES PROPOSED; RESTRUCTURED USER FEES AS NEW; USER FEES CONVERTED FROM DEPOSIT BASED TO FLAT FEE Sort
Item No. in
Fee Study User Group/Dept Status Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee $ Δ 187 110 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Tenant Improvement - 10,000 - 24,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $8,083.98 0% $8,083.00 flat NA 188 111 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Tenant Improvement - 25,000 - 49,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $9,002.92 0% $9,002.00 flat NA 189 112 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Tenant Improvement - 50,000 - 49,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $10,653.36 0% $10,653.00 flat NA 190 113 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Tenant Improvement - 50,000 - 75,000 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $11,442.28 0% $11,442.00 flat NA 191 114 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Tenant Improvement - Over 75,000 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New NA NA To be determined by the
Building Official flat NA
193 116 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Tenant Improvement - 0 - 1,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $4,899.98 0% $4,899.00 flat NA 194 117 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Tenant Improvement - 2,000 - 4,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $6,127.92 0% $6,127.00 flat NA 195 118 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Tenant Improvement - 5,000 - 9,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $7,871.96 0% $7,871.00 flat NA 196 119 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Tenant Improvement - 10,000 - 24,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $9,761.06 0% $9,761.00 flat NA 197 120 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Tenant Improvement - 25,000 - 49,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $10,680.01 0% $10,680.00 flat NA 198 121 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Tenant Improvement - 50,000 - 49,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $12,330.44 0% $12,330.00 flat NA 199 122 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Tenant Improvement - 50,000 - 75,000 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $15,123.69 0% $15,123.00 flat NA 200 123 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Tenant Improvement - Over 75,000 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New NA NA To be determined by the
Building Official NA
203 126 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Garage / Workshop / Green House - 0 - 1,000 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $2,141.78 0% $2,141.00 flat NA 204 127 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Garage / Workshop / GreenHouse -1,001 - 3,000 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $2,600.47 0% $2,600.00 flat NA 205 128 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Garage / Workshop / Greenhouse- 3,000 + sq. ft (3 plan review included) New NA NA To be determined by the
Building Official NA
206 129 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Miscellaneous - Wood deck, patio enclosure, fire damage, minor demolition, spray booth, storage rack (up to 3 plan reviews) deposit based $1,068.08 0% $1,068.00 flat NA 209 132 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Patio Cover/ Latice/Wood Deck/Porch (Not Enclosed) up to 500 square feet (Up to 3 Plan Reviews) Deposit Program $870.62 0% $870.00 flat NA 210 133 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Patio Cover/Lattice/Wood Deck/Porch (Not Enclosed) each additional 250 square feet (up to 3 plan reviews) New $370.45 0% $370.00 flat NA 211 134 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Enclosed Patio Cover up to 500 square feet (Up to 3 Plan Reviews) New $989.20 0% $989.00 flat NA 212 135 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Enclosed Patio Cover each additional 250 square feet (up to 3 plan reviews) New $435.31 0% $435.00 flat NA 215 138 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Base Fee (3 submittals) New per sheet $1,464.85 0% $1,464.00 NA 216 139 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Each additional submittal New per sheet $274.84 0% $274.00 NA

Page 3 of 13 ends

Page 4 of 13 ends

Ft. or structural) $505.98 0% $505.00 NA
255 178 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Light Pole New Each (All trades) $836.10 0% $836.00 NA 256 179 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Additional light pole New each additional $141.10 0% $141.00 NA 257 180 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Flag Pole New Each $530.51 0% $530.00 NA 258 181 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Non-structural Re-Roofing - For the first 3,000 square feet $335.00 deposit $328.98 0% $328.00 flat -$7 259 182 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Non-structural - each additional 1,000 square foot New $93.94 1% $93.00 flat NA

Page 5 of 13 ends

Page 6 of 13 ends

USER FEE LIST
(INCLUDES NEW USER FEES PROPOSED; RESTRUCTURED USER FEES AS NEW; USER FEES CONVERTED FROM DEPOSIT BASED TO FLAT FEE Sort
Item No. in
Fee Study User Group/Dept Status Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee $ Δ 268 191 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Non-City Standard Retaining Wall for up to nine feet high, up to 50 linear feet (up to 3 plan reviews) Deposit Program $859.48 0% $859.00 flat NA 269 192 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee
Non-City Standard Retaining Wall each additional 50 linear feet New $370.45 0% $370.00 flat NA 270 193 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Pool / Spa (Up to 500 sq. ft.) (up to 3 plan reviews) Deposit Program $1,136.62 0% $1,136.00 flat NA 271 194 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Pool / Spa ( 500 sq. ft. to 1000 sq. ft.) (up to 3 plan reviews) New $1,864.42 0% $1,864.00 flat NA 272 195 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Pool / Spa (Greater than 1000 sq. ft.) (up to 3 plan reviews) New $2,555.44 0% $2,555.00 flat NA 274 197 Building
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Temporary Trailer $500.00 deposit $414.86 0% $414.00 flat -$86 75 42 Planning
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Administrative Remedy $500.00 deposit $768.44 2% $750.00 flat fee $250 39 6 Planning
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Conditional Use Permit - Others New Flat fee $4,161.71 4% $4,000.00 Flat fee NA 41 8 Planning
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Minor Conditional Use Permit $1,000.00 deposit $1,531.95 2% $1,500.00 Flat Fee $500 43 10 Planning
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Entertainment Permit $550.00 Deposit $1,266.64 5% $1,200.00 flat fee $650 52 19 Planning
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Precise Development - Others New Flat fee $2,539.37 2% $2,500.00 flat fee NA 61 28 Planning
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Temporary Use Permit - Others New Flat Fee $870.32 2% $850.00 flat fee NA 63 30 Planning
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Mills Act Contract $250.00 Deposit $2,030.09 1% $2,000.00 flat fee $1,750 65 32 Planning
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Film Permit - Small Scale $500.00 Deposit $668.95 3% $650.00 flat fee $150 67 34 Planning
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Preliminary Plan Review $2,000.00 deposit $2,537.51 1% $2,500.00 flat fee $500 70 37 Planning
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Tree Removal Permit (up to 5 trees) $500.00 Deposit $570.37 4% $550.00 flat fee $50 71 38 Planning
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Tree Removal Permit (6+ trees) New Flat fee $822.32 3% $800.00 flat fee NA 76 43 Planning
User Fees Converted from Deposit Based to Flat Fee Administrative Interpretation New Flat fee $1,074.40 7% $1,000.00 flat fee NA 15 15
Administrative
Services New User Fees Proposed Service Fee New NA NA
The service fee shall vary
based on the rate NA
83 6 Building New User Fees Proposed Building Permit Technician Rate New per hour $93.55 1% $93.00 NA90 13 Building New User Fees Proposed Building Inspection (When Building Fires Occurs During Working Hours) New $377.99 0% $377.00 NA 91 14 Building New User Fees Proposed
Building Inspection (When Building Fires Occurs During NonWorking Hours) New $755.99 0% $755.00 NA 237 160 Building New User Fees Proposed Training Surcharge (AB 717) New Per permit $3.00 0% $3.00 NA277 200 Building New User Fees Proposed Special Inspector Registration (Each Certification) New Each Certification $330.27 0% $330.00 NA285 208 Building New User Fees Proposed CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (New Construction) New $468.51 0% $468.00 NA

Page 7 of 13 ends

Page 8 of 13 ends

Page 9 of 13 ends

USER FEE LIST
(INCLUDES NEW USER FEES PROPOSED; RESTRUCTURED USER FEES AS NEW; USER FEES CONVERTED FROM DEPOSIT BASED TO FLAT FEE Sort
Item No. in
Fee Study User Group/Dept Status Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee $ Δ 226 149 Building Restructured User Fees Proposed as New Multi-family Residential Buildings (Apartments, Motels, Hotels & Condo & non-residential construction (tenant improvements) - per 100 square feet New per 100 sq ft / single item $21.18 1% $21.00 NA 227 150 Building Restructured User Fees Proposed as New Multi-family Residential Buildings (Apartments, Motels, Hotels & Condo & non-residential construction (tenant improvements) - each additional square feet New each square feet after $0.21 1% $0.21 NA 228 151 Building Restructured User Fees Proposed as New New Single and Two Family buildings - per 100 square feet New per 100 sq ft / single item $24.86 3% $24.00 NA 229 152 Building Restructured User Fees Proposed as New New Single and Two Family buildings - each additional square feet New each square feet after $0.25 3% $0.24 NA 230 153 Building Restructured User Fees Proposed as New Garages, Carports, Covered Patios (attached or detached) Misc structures - per 100 square feet New per 100 sq ft / single item $11.98 8% $11.00 NA 231 154 Building Restructured User Fees Proposed as New Garages, Carports, Covered Patios (attached or detached) Misc structures - each additional square feet New each square feet after $0.12 0% $0.12 NA 233 156 Building Restructured User Fees Proposed as New Mechanical Permit New NA NA 80% of electrical NA 235 158 Building Restructured User Fees Proposed as New Plumbing Permit New NA NA 80% of electrical NA 238 161 Building Restructured User Fees Proposed as New Deferred Submittal plan check Fee for flat fee based projects New per hour (2 hrs min.) $184.07 0% $184.00 NA239 162 Building Restructured User Fees Proposed as New Permit Renewal Fee New NA NA All of original fee NA 240 163 Building Restructured User Fees Proposed as New Plan Check Renewal Fee for flat fee based projects New NA NA All of original fee NA 241 164 Building Restructured User Fees Proposed as New Expediated Plan Check New per hour (2 hrs min.) $276.11 0% $276.00 per hour NA 278 201 Building Restructured User Fees Proposed as New ADA Hardship Exemption Form (Processing, review & approval) New per hour (Min. 4 hours) $189.00 0% $189.00 NA 279 202 Building Restructured User Fees Proposed as New Building Code Modification Form or Alternate Means & Methods Form (Processing, review &approval) New per hour (5 hr Min.) $189.00 0% $189.00 NA 280 203 Building Restructured User Fees Proposed as New Temporary Structures/Buildings (Event stages, Event Tents, Construction Trailers,…….) New $759.27 0% $759.00 NA 284 207 Building Restructured User Fees Proposed as New Fire Sprinklers (Structural Review) New Building management rate
(2 hrs min.) $377.99 0% $377.00 NA
290 2 Fire Restructured User Fees Proposed as New Fire Prevention Program Fire Suppression Inspection
Fee New $83.91 1% $83.00 per 1/2 hour NA
304 16 Fire Restructured User Fees Proposed as New Other Fees Special events
permit/inspection fee New $111.78 1% $111.00 per hour NA 305 17 Fire Restructured User Fees Proposed as New Other Fees Special events
permit/inspection fee - after
hours New $167.67 0% $167.00 per hour NA
316 28 Fire Restructured User Fees Proposed as New Development Fee Fire Permit Extension Fee New $169.62 1% $168.00 NA 40 7 Planning Restructured User Fees Proposed as New Conditional Use Permit - Amendment New deposit/flat fee NA NA 50% of original fee deposit/flat
fee NA
77 44 Planning Restructured User Fees Proposed as New Encroachment License Agreement New flat fee $525.02 5% $500.00 flat fee NA 350 14 Public Works Restructured User Fees Proposed as New Improvement Plan Review New Per Plan $857.60 1% $850.00 Flat NA351 15 Public Works Restructured User Fees Proposed as New per additional sheet New Per Sheet $46.05 2% $45.00 Deposit NA 352 16 Public Works Restructured User Fees Proposed as New Traffic Control Review (site specific) New $286.74 1% $285.00 Flat NA 353 17 Public Works Restructured User Fees Proposed as New Traffic Control Review (WATCH) New $77.20 3% $75.00 Flat NA 9 9
Administrative Services User Fees Proposed to be Increased Utility Research Assistance Fee $38.00 per request $139.31 0% $139.00 $101

Page 10 of 13 ends

0.08% of Construction Permit
Valuation 0.21% 3% 0.20% 0.12%
98 21 Building User Fees Proposed to be Increased General Maintenance Fee .00196 x valuation (Valuation
Varies) 0.00276% 0% 0.00276% 0.001%
99 22 Building User Fees Proposed to be Increased Permit Issuance Fees - Building & Safety Division $40.00 per permit (included in
FLAT fees) $93.55 1% $93.00 $53
100 23 Building User Fees Proposed to be Increased Certificate of Occupancy - Ownership Change $125.00 $393.25 0% $393.00 $268 101 24 Building User Fees Proposed to be Increased Certificate of Occupancy - All Others $313.00 $715.64 0% $715.00 $402102 25 Building User Fees Proposed to be Increased Certificate of Occupancy - Temporary (TCO) $168.00 $585.92 0% $585.00 $417 201 124 Building User Fees Proposed to be Increased
Business Signs (Up to 3 signs, same charge for additional 3 signs) (up to 3 plan reviews) $80 / $120 $458.69 0% $458.00 $338 207 130 Building User Fees Proposed to be Increased Miscellaneous - All other items not otherwise identified $200 / $300 $1,068.08 0% $1,068.00 flat $768 208 131 Building User Fees Proposed to be Increased Miscellaneous - General residential minor repairs $55 / $80 $285.14 0% $285.00 flat $205 273 196 Building User Fees Proposed to be Increased Small Appliances - For the first appliance $50.00 $105.20 0% $105.00 flat $55 287 210 Building User Fees Proposed to be Increased
Reinstatement of Expired Building Application (at discretion of Building Official) Each Extension 168.00 $235.77 0% $235.00 $67 288 211 Building User Fees Proposed to be Increased
Reinstatement of Expired Permit (at discretion of Building Official) Each Extension 168.00 $235.77 0% $235.00 $67 292 4 Fire User Fees Proposed to be Increased Development Fee Fire Plan Check Rate $133.00 $218.02 0% $218.00 per hour $85 295 7 Fire User Fees Proposed to be Increased Development Fee After Hours Fire Inspection
Rate $133.00 $167.67 0% $167.00 per hour $34
296 8 Fire User Fees Proposed to be Increased Development Fee After Hours Plan Check Rate $133.00 $327.02 0% $327.00 per hour $194 298 10 Fire User Fees Proposed to be Increased Development Fee Expedited Fire Plan Check
(case by case basis at the
direction of Director or
designee) $200.00 $282.29 1% $280.00 per hour $80
299 11 Fire User Fees Proposed to be Increased Permit Issuance Fee $40.00 $94.59 1% $94.00 each permit $54

Page 11 of 13 ends

USER FEE LIST
(INCLUDES NEW USER FEES PROPOSED; RESTRUCTURED USER FEES AS NEW; USER FEES CONVERTED FROM DEPOSIT BASED TO FLAT FEE Sort
Item No. in
Fee Study User Group/Dept Status Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee $ Δ 300 12 Fire User Fees Proposed to be Increased Other Fees Fire Code Non-Compliance
Fee for Re-inspection after
2nd re-inspection $231.50 NA NA $300.00 $69
301 13 Fire User Fees Proposed to be Increased Other Fees Fire False Alarm Response $192.00 $671.31 0% $671.00 per
occurrence $479
302 14 Fire User Fees Proposed to be Increased Special Activity Permit Fire Code Interpretation Fee $42.00 $188.19 0% $188.00 per hour
($376 $146
35 2 Planning User Fees Proposed to be Increased Appeal Processing (residents - non-applicant) $50.00 flat fee $2,005.62 63% $750.00 flat fee $70046 13 Planning User Fees Proposed to be Increased General Plan Maintenance Fee $1.96 per $1,000 of construction
value $2.76 0% $2.76
per $1,000 of
construction
value $1
47 14 Planning User Fees Proposed to be Increased Planning Entitlement/Plan Check Management Rate $175.00 per hour $249.38 0% $249.00 per hour $7448 15 Planning User Fees Proposed to be Increased Planning Entitlement/Plan Check Regular Rate $109.00 per hour $129.72 1% $129.00 per hour $2072 39 Planning User Fees Proposed to be Increased Zoning Verification Letter $291.00 Flat fee $404.39 1% $400.00 flat fee $109 74 41 Planning User Fees Proposed to be Increased Plan Review - Others $1,000.00 Flat fee $1,538.43 2% $1,500.00 flat fee $500 317 1 Police User Fees Proposed to be Increased Audio Duplication $35.00 per copy $85.80 39% $52.00 $17 318 2 Police User Fees Proposed to be Increased Alarm System Application Permit (Residential) $25.00 $43.27 15% $37.00 $12319 3 Police User Fees Proposed to be Increased Alarm System Application Permit (Commercial) $25.00 $43.27 15% $37.00 $12324 8 Police User Fees Proposed to be Increased Citation Sign-Off $25.00 $28.13 0% $28.00 $3 325 9 Police User Fees Proposed to be Increased Clearance Letter $25.00 $31.22 1% $31.00 $6331 15 Police User Fees Proposed to be Increased Vehicle Releases (Stored) $110.00 $145.43 0% $145.00 $35332 16 Police User Fees Proposed to be Increased Vehicle Releases (Impounded) $162.00 $207.15 0% $207.00 $45 334 18 Police User Fees Proposed to be Increased Video Duplication $35.00 per copy $110.55 53% $52.00 $17 338 2 Public Works User Fees Proposed to be Increased Public Works Plan Check Management Rate $167.00 Per Hour $286.74 0% $286.00 per Hour
(FLAT) $119
339 3 Public Works User Fees Proposed to be Increased Public Works Plan Check Rate $171.00 Per Hour $220.32 0% $220.00 per Hour
(FLAT) $49
340 4 Public Works User Fees Proposed to be Increased Public Works Inspection Management Rate $168.00 Per Hour $286.74 0% $286.00 per Hour
(FLAT) $118
341 5 Public Works User Fees Proposed to be Increased Public Works Inspection Rate $168.00 Per Hour $219.85 0% $219.00 per Hour
(FLAT) $51
344 8 Public Works User Fees Proposed to be Increased After Hour Rate (Public Works Inspection) (2 Hour Minimum) $252.00 Per Hour $329.77 0% $329.00 per Hour
(FLAT) $77
346 10 Public Works User Fees Proposed to be Increased Permit Application $30.00 Per Permit $154.39 3% $150.00 Flat $120347 11 Public Works User Fees Proposed to be Increased Permit Issuance $45.00 Per Permit $93.55 1% $93.00 Flat $48 376 40 Public Works User Fees Proposed to be Increased Application, Plan Check, and Issuance Fee (up to 5 facilities) $500.00 Per Application $953.47 0% $950.00 Flat $450377 41 Public Works User Fees Proposed to be Increased 6+ Facilities $100.00 Per SWF after 5 $184.19 2% $180.00 Flat $80378 42 Public Works User Fees Proposed to be Increased Application, Plan Check, and Issuance Fee (New Pole for SWF) $1,000.00 Per SWF $1,966.54 3% $1,900.00 Flat $900404 68 Public Works User Fees Proposed to be Increased Wide Load Permit $20.00 Per Submittal $38.85 2% $38.00 Flat $18 16 1 Water Utility User Fees Proposed to be Increased New Account/Application Fee $45.00 $138.58 50% $69.00 $24 18 3 Water Utility User Fees Proposed to be Increased After Hours Service $90.00 $576.46 50% $288.00 $198 19 4 Water Utility User Fees Proposed to be Increased Cut Lock / Broken Lock / Missing Lock $60.00 $190.43 0% $190.00 $130 20 5 Water Utility User Fees Proposed to be Increased Meter Abandonment $100.00 $219.59 0% $219.00 $119 22 7 Water Utility User Fees Proposed to be Increased Intentional Damage to Meter $120.00 plus cost of equipment $370.08 0% $370.00 $25023 8 Water Utility User Fees Proposed to be Increased Broken Angle Stop $45.00 per hour plus cost of
equipment $673.42 0% $673.00 $628

Page 12 of 13 ends

Page 13 of 13 ends

City of Brea
User Fee Study
i Comprehensive User Fee Study

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................. i Executive Summary .................................................................................................. 1 User Fee Background ............................................................................................... 2 Background .................................................................................................................................................. 2 California User Fee History .......................................................................................................................... 2 Additional Policy Considerations ................................................................................................................. 3 Study Objective ....................................................................................................... 4 Scope of the Study ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Aim of the Report......................................................................................................................................... 5 Project Approach and Methodology ........................................................................... 6 Conceptual Approach................................................................................................................................... 6 Fully Burdened Hourly Rates........................................................................................................................ 6 Summary Steps of the Study ........................................................................................................................ 7 Allowable Costs ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................ 8 Quality Control/Quality Assurance .............................................................................................................. 8 Reasons for cost increases/decreases over current fees............................................................................. 8 City Staff Contributions ................................................................................................................................ 9 Brea User Fees ...................................................................................................... 10 Cost Recovery............................................................................................................................................. 10 Subsidization .............................................................................................................................................. 10 Impact on Demand (Elasticity) ................................................................................................................... 11 Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 11 Administrative Services .......................................................................................... 12 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 12 Water Utility Billing ............................................................................................... 13 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 13 Planning ............................................................................................................... 14 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 14 Building ................................................................................................................ 15 ii Comprehensive User Fee Study
Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 15 Community Services ............................................................................................... 16 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 16 Fire ...................................................................................................................... 17 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 17 Police ................................................................................................................... 18 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 18 Public Works ......................................................................................................... 19 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 19 Appendix A – Total Allowable Cost to be Recovered .................................................. 20 Appendix B – Fully Burdened Hourly Rates ............................................................... 21 Appendix C – Cost Recovery Analysis ....................................................................... 27

1 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Executive Summary
The City of Brea engaged Willdan Financial Services (Willdan) to determine the full costs incurred by the City to support the various activities for which the City charges user fees. Due to the complexity and the breadth of performing a comprehensive review of fees, Willdan employed a variety of fee methodologies to identify the full costs of individual fee and program activities. This report and the appendices herein identify recommended cost recovery for City Services as well as the full cost recovery amount. Appendix C details the full cost and suggested fees as determined through discussion with departmental staff. The recommended fees identified herein are either at or less than full cost recovery.

2 Comprehensive User Fee Study
User Fee Background
Background
As part of a general cost recovery strategy, local governments adopt user fees to fund programs and services that provide limited or no direct benefit to the community as a whole (“User Fees”). As cities struggle to maintain levels of service and variability of demand, they have become increasingly aware of subsidies provided by the General Fund and have implemented cost-recovery targets. To the extent that governments use general tax monies to provide individuals with private benefits, and not require them to pay the full cost of the service (and, therefore, receive a subsidy), the government is limiting funds that may be available to provide other community-wide benefits. In effect, the government is using community funds to pay for private benefits. Unlike most revenue sources, cities have more control over the level of user fees they charge to recover costs, or the subsidies they can institute.

Fees in California are required to conform to the statutory requirements of the California Constitution, Proposition 218, Proposition 26, and the California Code of Regulations. The Code also requires that the City Council adopt fees by either ordinance or resolution, and that any fees in excess of the estimated total cost of rendering the related services must be approved by a popular vote of two-thirds of those electors voting because the charge would be considered a tax and not a fee. There are no fees suggested to be set above the cost of service and as such a public vote is not required.

California User Fee History
Before Proposition 13, in times of fiscal shortages, California cities were able to raise property taxes, which funded everything from police and recreation to development-related services. However, this situation changed with the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978.

Proposition 13 established the era of revenue limitation in California local government. In subsequent years, the state saw a series of additional limitations to local government revenues. Proposition 4 (1979) defined the difference between a tax and a fee: a fee can be no greater than the cost of providing the service; and Proposition 218 (1996) further limited the imposition of taxes for certain classes of fees. As a result, cities were required to secure a supermajority vote to enact or increase taxes. Due to the thresholds needed to increase local taxes, cities have less control and very few successful options for new revenues. The State of California took a series of actions in the 1990’s and 2000’s to improve the State’s fiscal situation, at the expense of local governments. In 2004-05, the Educational Revenue Augmentation Funds (“ERAF”) takeaway of property taxes and the reduction of Vehicle License Fees further reduced local tax revenues.

In addition, on November 2, 2010, California voters approved Proposition 26, the “Stop Hidden Taxes Initiative”, which is aimed at defining “regulatory fees” as a special tax rather than a fee, thus requiring approval by two-thirds vote of local voters. These regulatory fees are typically intended to mitigate the societal and environmental impacts of a business or person’s activities. Proposition 26 contains seven categories of exceptions. The fees analyzed as part of a User Fee study typically fall under categories one through five consisting of charges for specific benefits, government service, regulatory need, for use of government property, or a fine/penalty.
3 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Additional Policy Considerations
State regulations require that municipalities update their fee schedules to reflect the actual costs of certain public services primarily benefiting users. User Fees recover costs associated with the provision of specific services benefiting the user, thereby typically reducing the use of General Fund monies for such purposes.

In addition to collecting the direct cost of labor and materials associated with processing and administering user services, it is common for local governments to recover reasonable support costs. Support costs are those costs relating to a local government’s central service departments that are allocable to the local government’s operating departments. Central services support cost allocations were incorporated using the resulting indirect overhead percentages determined through the City’s Cost Allocation Plan. A Cost Allocation Plan identifies the central service functions of the City such as Finance, City Manager, and Human Resources and allocates their cost to the departments and funds of the City that they support. This plan was used in the User Fee study to account for the burden placed upon central services by the operating departments to allocate a proportionate share of central service cost through the study.

As labor effort and costs associated with the provision of services fluctuate over time, a significant element in the development of any fee schedule is that it has the flexibility to remain current. Therefore, it is recommended that the City include an inflationary factor in the resolution adopting the fee schedule to allow the City to annually increase or decrease the fees by changes in a pre-approved inflationary index, as described below. However, such inflationary increases shall not exceed the reasonable estimated cost of providing the services each year.

The City may employ many different inflationary factors. The most commonly used inflator is some form of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) as it is widely well known and accepted. A similar inflator is the implicit price deflator for GDP, which is much like the CPI except that while the CPI is based on the same “basket” of goods and services every year, the price deflators’ “basket” can change year to year. Since the primary factor for the cost of a City’s services is usually the costs of the personnel involved, tying an inflationary factor that connects more directly to the personnel costs can also be suitable if there is a clear method, or current practice of obtaining said factor.

Each City should use an inflator that they believe works the best for their specific situation and needs but cannot rely solely on the CPI increase as it is incumbent upon each agency to ensure the amount of the fees charged does not exceeds the reasonable estimated costs of providing the services. It is also recommended that the City perform this internal review annually with a comprehensive review of services and fees performed every five years, which would include adding, amending, or removing fees for programs/services.
4 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Study Objective
As the City of Brea seeks to efficiently manage limited resources and adequately respond to increased service demands, it needs a variety of tools. A User Fee Study provides assurance that the City has the best information and the best resources available to make sound decisions, fairly and legitimately set fees, maintain compliance with state law and local policies, and meet the needs of the City administration and its constituency. Given the limitations on raising revenue in local government, the City recognizes that a User Fee Study is a very cost-effective way to understand the total cost of services and identify potential fee deficiencies. Essentially, a User Fee is a payment for a requested service provided by a local government that primarily benefits an individual or group. Penalties and fines are violations, and should be set to deter activities, and are not based on the cost of a service.

The total cost of each service included in this analysis is based on the full cost of providing City services, including direct salaries and benefits of City staff, direct departmental costs, and indirect costs from central service support. This study determines the full cost recovery fee for the City to provide each service; however, each fee is set at the City’s discretion, up to 100% of the total cost, as specified in this report.

The principal goal of the study was to help the City determine the full cost of the services that the City provides. In addition, Willdan established a series of additional objectives including:
 Developing a rational basis for setting fees
 Align development related fee structures to assign flat fee(s) for less complex projects and retain deposit based fees for more complex projects
 Identifying subsidy amount, if applicable, of each fee in the model  Ensuring compliance with State law
 Developing an updatable and comprehensive list of fees  Maintaining accordance with City policies and goals
The study results will help the City better understand its true costs of providing services and may serve as a basis for making informed policy decisions regarding the most appropriate fees, if any, to collect from individuals and organizations that require individualized services from the City.

Scope of the Study
The scope of this study encompasses a review and calculation of the user fees charged by the following Brea departments and fee groups:
 Administrative Services
 Water Utility Billing
 Planning
 Building
 Community Services
 Fire
 Police
 Public Works
5 Comprehensive User Fee Study
The study involved the identification of existing and potential new fees, fee schedule restructuring, data collection and analysis, orientation and consultation, quality control, communication and presentations, and calculation of individual service costs (fees) or program cost recovery levels.

Aim of the Report
The User Fee Study focused on the cost of City services, as City staff currently provide them at existing, known, or reasonably anticipated service and staff level needs. This report provides a summary of the study results, and a general description of the approach and methods Willdan and City staff used to determine the recommended fee schedule. The report is not intended to document all the numerous discussions throughout the process, nor is it intended to provide an influential dissertation on the qualities of the utilized tools, techniques, or alternative approaches.

6 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Project Approach and Methodology
Conceptual Approach
The basic concept of a User Fee Study is to determine the “reasonable cost” of each service provided by the City for which it charges a user fee. The full cost of providing a service may not necessarily become the City’s fee, but it serves as the objective basis as to the maximum amount that may be collected.

The standard fee limitation established in California law for such fees is the “estimated, reasonable cost” principle. To maintain compliance with the letter and spirit of this standard, every component of the fee study process included a related review. The use of budget figures, time estimates, and improvement valuation clearly indicates reliance upon estimates for some data.

Fully Burdened Hourly Rates
The total cost of each service included in this analysis is primarily based on the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Fully Burdened Hourly Rates (FBHRs) that were determined for City personnel directly involved in providing services. The FBHRs include not only personnel salary and benefits (see Appendix B), but also any costs that are reasonably ascribable to personnel. The cost elements that are included in the calculation of fully burdened rates are:
 Salaries & benefits of personnel involved
 Operating costs applicable to fee operations
 Departmental support, supervision, and administration overhead  Central service overhead costs allocated through the Cost Allocation Plan A key factor in determining the fully burdened rate is in the calculation of productive hours for personnel.

This calculation takes the available workable hours in a year of 2,080 and adjusts this figure to 1,650 productive or billable hours to account for calculated or anticipated hours’ employees engage in nonbillable activities such as paid vacation, sick leave, holidays, and other considerations, as necessary. Dividing the full cost, including overhead, of a position by the number of productive hours provides the FBHR.

The FBHRs are then used in conjunction with time estimates, when appropriate for how a service is provided, to calculate a fee’s cost based on the personnel and the amount of their time providing each service.
7 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Summary Steps of the Study
The process of the study is straightforward and simple in concept. The following list provides a summary of the study process steps:

Allowable Costs
This report identifies three types of costs that, when combined, constitute the fully burdened cost of a service (Appendix A). Costs are defined as
direct labor, including salary and benefits,
departmental overhead costs, and the City’s
central services overhead, where
departmental and central service overhead
costs constitute support costs. These cost
types are defined as follows:
 Direct Labor (Personnel Costs): The
costs related to staff salaries for
time spent directly on fee-related
services.
 Departmental Overhead: A
proportional allocation of
departmental overhead costs,
including operation costs such as
supplies and materials that are necessary for the department to function.  Central Services Overhead: These costs, as provided via the City’s Cost Allocation Plan, represent services provided by those Central Services Departments whose primary function is to support other City departments.

Data Analysis
Department Interviews
Time Estimates
Labor Costs
Cost Allocation Plan
Building Cost Layers
Direct Services
Indirect Services
Department Overhead
City-Wide Overhead
Set Fees
Define the Full Cost of
Services
Set Cost Recovery Policy
8 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Methodology
The two methods of analysis for calculating fees used in this report are the:

Case Study Method (Standard Unit Cost Build-Up Approach): This approach estimates the actual labor and material costs associated with providing a unit of service to a single user. This analysis is suitable when City staff time requirements do not vary dramatically for a service, or for special projects where the time and cost requirements are easy to identify at the project’s outset. Further, the method is effective in instances when a staff member from one department assists on an application, service or permit for another department on an as-needed basis. Costs are estimated based upon interviews with City staff regarding the time typically spent on tasks, a review of available records, and a time and materials analysis.

Program Cost Approach: In some instances, the underlying data is not available or varies widely, leaving a standard unit cost build-up approach impractical. In addition, market factors and policy concerns (as opposed to actual costs) tend to influence rental based fee levels more than other types of services. Willdan employed a different methodology where appropriate to fit a program’s needs and goals. Typical programmatic approach cases are valuation-based fees, Recreation programs, and instances where a program cost is divided over the user base to obtain a per applicant cost for shared cost services.

Quality Control/Quality Assurance
All study components are interrelated, thus flawed data at any step in the process will cause the ultimate results to be inconsistent and unsound. The elements of our Quality Control process for User Fee calculations include:
 Involvement of knowledgeable City staff
 Clear instructions and guidance to City staff
 Reasonable tests and validation
 Internal and external reviews
 Cross-checking
Reasons for cost increases/decreases over current fees
Within the fee tables in Appendix C, the differences are identified between the full costs calculated through the study and the fee levels currently in effect. The reasons for differences between the two can arise from a number of possible factors including:
 Previous fee levels may have been set at levels less than full cost intentionally, based on policy decisions
 Position staffing levels, seniority, and the positions that complete fee and service activity may vary from when the previous costs were calculated
 Personnel and materials costs could have increased at levels that differed from any inflationary factors used to increase fees since the last study
 Changes in processes and procedures within a department, or the City as a whole 9 Comprehensive User Fee Study
 Changes in the development fee structure with a shift from deposit based fees to flat fee structure for less complex projects and more complex projects to remain as a deposit based fee structure  Changes in the demand for services in a City may have also changed the staffing or cost structure of departments over time
Deposit based fees are established administratively based upon Municipal Code 3.32.035. Which states the following:
 The Community Development Director or designee (Director) is hereby authorized to determine the appropriate amount that must be maintained in such deposit until all application processing and related city services for which fees are charged have been completed. In estimating the required amount of funds to be deposited, the Director may utilize reasonable assumptions and shall consider determination of approximate amount based upon the amount of time historically spent on similar projects, and/or the likely expenditure estimates of staff time for the pending application based upon reasonable assumptions of the Director.  Source: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/brea/latest/brea_ca/0-0-0-59198 City Staff Contributions
As part of the study process, Willdan received tremendous support and cooperation from City staff, which contributed and reviewed a variety of components to the study, including:
 Budget and other cost data
 Staffing structures
 Fee and service structures, organization, and descriptions  Direct work hours (billable/non-billable)
 Time estimates to complete work tasks
 Review of draft results and other documentation
A User Fee Study requires significant involvement of the managers and line staff from the departments on top of their existing workloads and competing priorities. The contributions from City staff were critical to this study. We would like to express our appreciation to the City and its staff for their assistance, professionalism, positive attitudes, helpful suggestions, responsiveness, and overall cooperation. 10 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Brea User Fees
Cost Recovery
The cost recovery models, by department/division fee type, are presented in detail in Appendix C. Full cost recovery is determined by summing the estimated amount of time each position (in increments of minutes or hours) spends to render a service. Time estimates for each service rendered were obtained through interviews conducted with City staff for each department/division fee included in the study. The resulting cost recovery amount represents the total cost of providing each service. The City’s current fee being charged for each service, if applicable, is provided in this section, as well, for reference.

It is important to note that the time data used to determine the amount of time each employee spends assisting in the provision of the services listed on the fee schedule is essential in identifying the total cost of providing each service and will differ from City to City depending on staffing, positions involved, experience of staff, the use of consultants, and the policies and procedures in place for each City.

Specifically, in providing services, a number of employees are often involved in various aspects of the process, spending anywhere from a few minutes to several hours on the service.

The primary goal of this study was to identify the cost of City services and identify a development fee structure that would streamline the fee collection process. Less complex and routine requests to be set up as a flat fee whereas more complexity requires a deposit, to provide information to help the City make informed decisions regarding the actual fee levels and charges. The responsibility of determining the final fee levels is a complicated task. City staff must consider many issues in formulating recommendations, and the City Council must consider those same issues and more in making the final decisions.

City staff assumes the responsibility to develop specific fee level recommendations to present to the City Council. Unfortunately, there are no fixed rules to guide the City, since many of the considerations are based on the unique characteristics of the City of Brea, and administrative and political discretion. However, in setting the level of full cost recovery for each fee, one should consider whether the service solely benefits one end user or the general community.

Subsidization
Recalling the definition of a user fee helps guide decisions regarding subsidization. The general standard is that individuals (or groups) who receive a wholly private benefit should pay 100% of the full cost of the services. In contrast, services that are simply public benefit should be funded entirely by the general fund’s tax dollars. Unfortunately, for the decision makers, some services fall into the range between these two extremes.

Further complicating the decision, opponents of fees often assert that the activities subject to the fees provide economic, cultural, “quality of life,” or other community benefits that exceed the costs to the City, but it is important to distinguish the difference between any purported possible benefits that may be conveyed through the result of activities of the service receiver and the direct benefit being conveyed through the City providing the service to the requestor.

It is recommended the City consider such factors during its deliberations regarding appropriate fee levels. 11 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Of course, subsidization can be an effective public policy tool since it can be used to reduce fees to encourage certain activities (such as to ensure public safety) or allow some people to be able to afford to receive services they otherwise could not at the full cost. In addition, subsidies can be an appropriate and justifiable action, such as to allow citizens to rightfully access services, without overburdensome costs.

Despite the intent, it is important for the City and public to understand that subsidies must be covered by another revenue source, typically the General Fund’s other unrestricted funds.

Impact on Demand (Elasticity)
Economic principles of elasticity suggest that increased costs for services (higher fees) will eventually curtail the demand for the services; whereas lower fees may spark an incentive to utilize the services and encourage certain actions. Either of these conditions may have a desirable effect to the City. However, the level of the fees that would cause demand changes is largely unknown. The cost of service study did not attempt to evaluate the economic or behavioral impacts of higher or lower fees; nevertheless, the City should consider the potential impacts of these issues when deciding on fee levels.

Summary
City staff are recommending setting user fees at suggested fee amounts as detailed in Appendix C. City and departmental goals, City Council priorities, policy initiatives, past performance, implementation issues, and other internal and external factors should influence staff recommendations and City Council decisions.

In this case, the proper identification of additional services (new or existing services) and the update to a consistent and comprehensive fee schedule were the primary objectives of this study. City staff have reviewed the full costs and identified the recommended fee levels for consideration by City Council.

The following sections provide background for each department, division, and fee group and the results of this study’s analysis of their fees. For the full list of each fee’s analysis, refer to Appendix C of this report. 12 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Administrative Services
The Administrative Services Department consists of five divisions: Administration, Revenue, Budget, Accounting and Auditing and Information Technology. The department is responsible for the fiscal affairs of the City and the Brea Public Financing Authority. This includes the handling and investment of cash, procurement of goods and services, disbursement of money, billing of utilities, recording of all transactions, preparation of payroll, preparation and maintenance of the budget and general ledger, and safeguarding the financial assets and financial records of the City. Furthermore, the Administrative Services Department serves as liaison to the Finance Committee and the Investment Advisory Committee.

The department also provides information technology services to the entire City organization as well as contracted client agencies through the Information Technology Division’s entrepreneurial base. Supporting all City departments, including public safety, requires staying abreast of current technology trends, security enhancements and changes to regulatory requirements while maintaining high levels of customer service to both internal and external customers. The division is comprised of the following programs: internal support, application support, external support, and geographic information system support.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associated with the Administrative Services Department. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services to update the fee schedule.

Many of the fees and services listed under Administrative Services are licenses, regulated fees, or fees not otherwise recommended to be changed. For the user fees evaluated as part of this study the analysis relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence was determined using staff time involved in providing services to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that most fees are currently set below the full cost of providing service. Staff is recommending the fees be adjusted as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
 An increase to 3 fees;
 1 fee would decrease;
 1 new Service fee would be added;
 8 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 the average fee change would be an increase of 20%.
13 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Water Utility Billing
The Water Division and Utility Billing Division are responsible for the city’s potable water system, including backflow prevention and water quality issues. Water service is established as part of City of Brea Utilities.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with Water Utility Billing. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of Water Utility Billing services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach for user fees, whereby the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence was determined using staff time involved in providing services to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City central services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. No utility rates are included in the fee schedules included in this report, and no analysis was done on any utility rates. The analysis of the user fees found that current fees are under funding the cost for most of the services. Staff is recommending the fees be adjusted as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
 An increase to 12 fees;
 6 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 the average fee change would be an increase of 45%.
14 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Planning
The Brea Planning Division is a vital part of the Community Development Department. Planning supports the life and business of the city by assuring that structures and amenities related to the built environment are well-functioning and of good quality. A dedicated professional team works with property owners and developers to help craft projects that will meet high standards. They also work to coordinate these projects in their early stages with neighbors so that proposed new construction or modifications to the property will be compatible with existing uses.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with the Planning Division. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of Planning services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence was determined using staff time involved in providing services to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City central services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that most current fees are under funding the cost for most of the services. In addition, Planning currently utilizes deposits for most services, and the city invoices against those deposit accounts to collect the full cost of service based upon City Council approved fully burdened hourly rates.

Staff is recommending the fees be adjusted as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
 An increase to 19 fees and deposits;
 10 new fees will be added;
 7 fees would change from deposit to a flat amount;
 2 fees would change from a set deposit fee amount to be variable based on the project and staff involvement;
 6 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 the average fee change would be an increase of 137% for fees that didn’t change their methodology (change from the current unit to a different unit in the Planning fee table). 15 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Building
The Building & Safety Division is committed to protecting the lives and safety of the residents and visitors of Brea, preserving the City’s quality of life, and contributing to the City’s economic development. This is accomplished through the implementation of the building, plumbing, mechanical, electrical, and energy codes, as well as code enforcement regulation of local and state laws for all buildings in the City of Brea. The Division provides plan review and field inspections of buildings to ensure a safe, accessible, and energyefficient environment throughout our community. The Division regulates local and state laws related to building construction, maintenance, use, repair, and rehabilitation. The Division also manages the City’s permit system which coordinates and streamlines the construction permit process. Applications for construction projects are submitted to the Building & Safety Division where the review process is coordinated among several departments. This provides the customer with a comprehensive single point of contact throughout the entire review and permit process.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with the Building Division. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of Building services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence was determined using staff time involved in providing services to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City central services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that most current fees are under funding the cost for most of the services. Staff is recommending the fees be adjusted as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
 An increase to 47 fees;
 121 new fees will be added to better reflect the services that are provided to the public; o Most are not new fees, but deviations of services already provided and a change in the fee structure from deposits to flat fees.
 3 fees would decrease;
 12 fees would remain as currently set;
 7 fees would change to a flat fee from a deposit based;  2 fees would change to deposit based from a to be determined by Building Official fee, and;  the average fee change would be an increase of 84% for current fees. 16 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Community Services
The Community Services Department creates community in the City of Brea through people, parks, and programs. It plays an important role in creating a healthy community through diverse and innovative recreation, special interests, cultural arts, human services, and senior programming. The Community Services Department provides space to learn and play, space to be safe and secure, and space to create and imagine.

The functions of the Community Services Department are assigned to five major areas: Administrative Division, Community Center, Recreation Services Division, Cultural Arts Division, and Human Services Division. In addition, Community Services is charged with the design and development of new facilities and parks, and other recreational elements within the community. The Department serves as the staff liaison to the Parks, Recreation and Human Services Commission, the Cultural Arts Commission, the Senior Center Leadership Council, the Olinda Oil Museum and Trail Task Force, the Student Advisory Board, and the Art in Public Places Committee. Through its five major areas and work with its Commissions, Boards, and Council, the Community Services Department supports all of the City’s Operational Goals.

Analysis
A cost recovery was analyzed for the Community Services Department and is about 16%. No Community Service fees would be changed as a result of this study.

Div Division Description
FY 2024-25
Adopted
Budget
Avg Revenues
FY19/20-
FY22/23
Division
Direct Cost
Recovery
Admin
Allocation
Department
Cost
Recovery
Indirect
Allocation
(22%)
Fully
Burdened
Cost Recovery
4145 CONTRACT CLASSES $224,944 $159,546 71% $133,517 45% $54,564 39% 4154 FACILITY RESERVATIONS $501,404 $378,924 76% $297,611 47% $121,624 41% 4215 FITNESS/WELLNESS PROGRAM $541,665 $352,891 65% $321,508 41% $131,390 35% 4217/4425 TEEN PROGRAMS/ACTIVITIES/PRESCHOOL $398,985 $151,609 38% $236,819 24% $96,780 21% 4224 KID WATCH $167,477 $17,545 10% $99,407 7% $40,624 6% 4421 SPECIAL EVENTS $307,645 $113,029 37% $85,137 29% $59,788 25% 4422 AQUATICS $357,862 $137,060 38% $212,411 24% $86,805 21% 4424 ATHLETICS $473,600 $160,388 34% $281,107 21% $114,880 18% 4428 YTH SUMMER ACTIV/DAY CAMP $275,788 $112,967 41% $163,695 26% $66,897 22% 4429 AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM $285,755 $0 0% $169,611 0% $69,315 0% 4521 SENIOR SERVICES (CENTER) $891,541 $26,620 3% $246,724 2% $173,264 2% 4523 BREA RESOURCE CENTER $490,270 $45,574 9% $135,677 7% $95,280 6% 4525 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM $109,512 $23,804 22% $14,771 19% $18,918 17% 4541 GALLERY $445,098 $69,154 16% $123,176 12% $86,501 11% 4542 THEATRE $958,406 $304,688 32% $129,273 28% $165,564 24% TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT $9,080,396 $2,113,876 23% $2,650,444 18% $1,382,194 16% 17 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Fire
The Fire department provides the delivery of life safety services by providing 24-hour emergency response to a wide variety of critical situations, including fires, explosions, hazardous materials incidents, medical emergencies, accidents, and miscellaneous public assistance requests. The department consists of three divisions: Administration, Fire Operations and Fire Prevention.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with the Fire Department. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of Fire services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence was determined using staff time involved in providing services to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City central services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that most of the current fees are underfunding the cost of most of the services.

Staff is recommending the fees be adjusted as detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
 An increase to 8 fees;
 6 fees would decrease;
 12 new restructured fees will be added;
 1 fee would remain as currently set, and;
 the average fee change would be an increase of 42% for current fees.

18 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Police
The Brea Police Department provides a full range of services to the City of Brea. The police department provides services to a total residential population of approximately 47,000 and a daylight population of approximately 125,000. The department deploys its personnel in two divisions: Support Services and Operations. In conjunction with the police department’s policing philosophy, each division will expand the use of crime analysis information to identify crime trends within our communities in an effort to better deploy our resources, prevent and reduce crime, and apprehend criminals. The department’s mission statement serves as a guide toward enhancing public safety within the community of Brea. The department further commits itself to collaborative decision-making, shared organizational values, and individual meaning in the workplace.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with the Police Department. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of Police services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence was determined using staff time involved in providing services to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City central services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that the current fees are under funding the cost for most of the services. Staff is recommending the fees be adjusted as detailed in Appendix C, with no increase being greater than full cost or 50% whichever is less. As a result, there would be:
 An increase to 8 fees;
 12 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 The average fee change would be an increase of 13%.
19 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Public Works
The Public Works Department provides a wide range of services to the community. Services include operations and maintenance of the public right-of-way and City facilities; design and construction of capital improvement projects; operations and maintenance of City utilities; oversight of sustainability practices; and support of various community activities throughout the year.

The Department utilizes a multi-disciplinary approach, combining City staff and outside contractors to provide the community with the most cost-effective and productive services. The Public Works Department consists of seven divisions, each with its specific area of responsibility and duties.

The Engineering Division is responsible for the design and construction of infrastructure, issuing Public Works permits, performing inspections, and administration of both the City’s Transportation Program and the Capital Improvement Program and coordinates with the Street Division to manage the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), Water Conservation programs, and Fats, Oils & Greases (FOG) programs. This division also supports other City Departments seeking construction and project management expertise and assistance.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with the Public Works Department. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of Public Works Department relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby we determined the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence using staff time to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services.

Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that most fees are currently set below the full cost of providing service. It is recommended that the City set Public Works fees at the levels detailed in Appendix C. As a result, there would be:
 an increase to 15 fees;
 36 new restructured fees would be added;
 3 fees will change from varies to a deposit;
 4 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 the average estimated increase would be around 97% for current fees. 20 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Appendix A – Total Allowable Cost to be Recovered
Below are the total allowable costs that may be recovered through User Fees; however, only a portion of the total allowable cost is recovered as staff not only works on services related to User Fees, but also works on an array of other City functions during the operational hours of the City. The direct overhead percentages below are derived by dividing operational costs by personnel cost. The indirect allocation percentages are provided through the Cost Allocation Plan. The amounts listed below will not reconcile to City budgets as costs that should not be included in overhead for personnel in the application of determining fully burdened hourly rates were excluded. Examples of these costs are capital, debt, monetary transfers, contract costs, and other costs that are charged directly to the service requestor.

City of Brea - User Fee Study
Overhead Rate Calculations (based on FY 2024-2025 data) Department
Total Employee
Services
Department
Operations &
Administration
Direct
Overhead %
Internal
Service
Overhead %
Cost
Allocation
Overhead %
110: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 396,242 74,153 19% 24% 0%
110: CITY ACCOUNTING 807,546 19,192 2% 15% 0%
110: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 1,007,372 50,005 5% 14% 0%
110: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2,586,978 195,735 8% 17% 27% 110: COMMUNITY SERVICES 5,532,022 738,405 13% 40% 22%
110: COUNCIL SUPPORT 436,976 125,720 29% 16% 0%
110: FIRE SERVICES 8,155,249 800,489 10% 15% 9%
110: MEDIA SERVICES/GRAPHICS 251,442 15,680 6% 30% 0%
110: POLICE SERVICES 23,471,543 1,185,502 5% 15% 9%
110: PUBLIC INFORMATION 428,895 113,457 26% 13% 0%
110: PUBLIC WORKS 3,160,996 1,052,609 33% 23% 35%
174: PARAMEDIC SERVICES 6,108,886 134,236 2% 12% 8%
280: HOUSING SUCCESSOR 168,999 92,048 54% 12% 13%
420: WATER UTILITY 2,290,768 629,387 27% 23% 22%
430: SEWER UTILITY 879,608 148,855 17% 25% 18%
440: SANITATION & ST SWEEPING 419,782 87,016 21% 46% 19% 21 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Appendix B – Fully Burdened Hourly Rates
Below are fully burdened hourly rates (FBHR’s) of staff positions that provide for the services detailed in Appendix C. The FBHR’s were used to determine the full cost of each service. They include the salary and benefit costs for each position as well as all applicable overhead amounts for each position as determined by the department they are assigned to. Refer previously to Appendix A for identifying the percentage overheads for each department. For any user fee service request that is outside the scope of the fees detailed in Appendix C, or for services for which there is no fee currently set, the City can notify and charge up to the full cost of the personnel, third party, or material cost involved to the service requestor. 22 Comprehensive User Fee Study
City of Brea - User Fee Study
Fully Burdened Hourly Rate Calculation
Department Title
Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate
110: CITY ACCOUNTING Accounting: Accounting Technician I $42.80 110: CITY ACCOUNTING Accounting: Accounting Technician II $87.64 110: CITY ACCOUNTING Accounting: Deputy Director of Administrative Services $228.51 110: CITY ACCOUNTING Accounting: Financial Services Manager $182.27 110: CITY ACCOUNTING Accounting: Fiscal Specialist $90.57 110: CITY ACCOUNTING Accounting: Senior Accountant $117.96 110: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Admin: Deputy City Manager/Director $304.86 110: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Admin: Deputy Director of Administrative Services $281.93 110: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Admin: Executive Assistant $101.90 110: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Admin: Senior Management Analyst $168.59 110: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CD: Administrative Clerk II $84.60 110: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CD: Assistant Planner $129.72 110: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CD: Building Official $189.00 110: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CD: City Planner $249.38
110: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CD: Combination Inspector II $119.78 110: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CD: Community Development Specialist $91.82 110: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CD: Deputy City Manager/Director $376.46 110: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CD: Economic Development Manager $189.75 110: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CD: Executive Assistant $122.05 110: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CD: Junior Plans Checker $118.59 110: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CD: Management Analyst I $116.19 110: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CD: Permit Technician $93.55 110: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CD: Planning Technician $85.97 110: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CD: Senior Management Analyst $161.74 110: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CD: Senior Planner $161.73
110: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE CM: City Manager $355.80
110: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE CM: Deputy City Manager/Director $273.53 110: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE CM: Emergency Preparedness Coordinator $138.78 110: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE CM: Executive Assistant $93.22 110: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE CM: Management Analyst I $94.93 110: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE CM: Senior Management Analyst $123.80 110: COUNCIL SUPPORT Council Support: City Clerk $223.55 110: COUNCIL SUPPORT Council Support: City Clerk Specialist $84.52 110: COUNCIL SUPPORT Council Support: Deputy City Clerk/Records Supervisor $151.27 110: COMMUNITY SERVICES CS: Community Services Director $416.66 110: COMMUNITY SERVICES CS: Community Services Specialist I $102.71 110: COMMUNITY SERVICES CS: Community Services Specialist II $128.17 110: COMMUNITY SERVICES CS: Community Services Supervisor $194.26 110: COMMUNITY SERVICES CS: Deputy Director of Community Services $283.68 110: COMMUNITY SERVICES CS: Executive Assistant $114.23 110: COMMUNITY SERVICES CS: Fiscal Specialist $150.13
23 Comprehensive User Fee Study
City of Brea - User Fee Study
Fully Burdened Hourly Rate Calculation
Department Title
Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate
110: COMMUNITY SERVICES CS: Media Services Specialist I $81.45 110: COMMUNITY SERVICES CS: Media Services Specialist II $143.85 110: COMMUNITY SERVICES CS: Senior Management Analyst $199.05 110: FIRE SERVICES Fire: Combination Inspector II $114.30 110: FIRE SERVICES Fire: Executive Assistant $93.28
110: FIRE SERVICES Fire: Fire Battalion Chief $427.58
110: FIRE SERVICES Fire: Fire Captain $259.45
110: FIRE SERVICES Fire: Fire Chief $417.95
110: FIRE SERVICES Fire: Fire Engineer $242.25
110: FIRE SERVICES Fire: Fire Marshal $188.19
110: FIRE SERVICES Fire: Fire Prevention Specialist I $111.78 110: FIRE SERVICES Fire: Firefighter $167.83
110: FIRE SERVICES Fire: Permit Technician $94.59
110: MEDIA SERVICES/GRAPHICS Graphics: Senior Media Servs Specialist - AV $119.47 110: POLICE SERVICES Police: Communications Supervisor $141.36 110: POLICE SERVICES Police: Crime Analyst $121.24
110: POLICE SERVICES Police: Crime Scene Investigator $122.97 110: POLICE SERVICES Police: Executive Assistant $102.47 110: POLICE SERVICES Police: Management Analyst I $100.28 110: POLICE SERVICES Police: Police Captain $394.32
110: POLICE SERVICES Police: Police Chief $393.51
110: POLICE SERVICES Police: Police Comm Outreach Coordinator $87.93 110: POLICE SERVICES Police: Police Lieutenant $363.44
110: POLICE SERVICES Police: Police Officer $221.09
110: POLICE SERVICES Police: Police Records Technician $80.84 110: POLICE SERVICES Police: Police Records/Property & Evidence Sv. $147.49 110: POLICE SERVICES Police: Police Sergeant $295.41
110: POLICE SERVICES Police: Police Services Officer $101.84 110: POLICE SERVICES Police: Property and Evidence Technician $102.30 110: POLICE SERVICES Police: Public Safety Dispatcher I $75.62 110: POLICE SERVICES Police: Public Safety Dispatcher II $100.71 110: POLICE SERVICES Police: Senior Public Safety Dispatcher $116.59 110: POLICE SERVICES Police: Sr. Police Records Technician $102.15 110: PUBLIC INFORMATION Pub Info: Communications & Marketing Manager $197.82 110: PUBLIC INFORMATION Pub Info: Management Analyst I $109.46 110: PUBLIC INFORMATION Pub Info: Media Services Specialist I $97.55 110: PUBLIC WORKS PW: Accounting Technician I $108.41
110: PUBLIC WORKS PW: Administrative Clerk II $103.20
110: PUBLIC WORKS PW: Assistant Engineer $184.19
110: PUBLIC WORKS PW: City Engineer $286.74
110: PUBLIC WORKS PW: Combination Inspector II $152.51
24 Comprehensive User Fee Study
City of Brea - User Fee Study
Fully Burdened Hourly Rate Calculation
Department Title
Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate
110: PUBLIC WORKS PW: Engineering Technician I $124.59
110: PUBLIC WORKS PW: Executive Assistant $155.40
110: PUBLIC WORKS PW: Landscape Main. Contract Admin $172.98 110: PUBLIC WORKS PW: Maintenance Services Crew Leader $165.58 110: PUBLIC WORKS PW: Maintenance Services Superintendent $220.70 110: PUBLIC WORKS PW: Maintenance Services Supervisor $195.57 110: PUBLIC WORKS PW: Maintenance Services Worker I $79.29 110: PUBLIC WORKS PW: Maintenance Services Worker II $141.56 110: PUBLIC WORKS PW: Management Analyst I $145.96
110: PUBLIC WORKS PW: Permit Technician $115.56
110: PUBLIC WORKS PW: Principal Civil Engineer $243.98
110: PUBLIC WORKS PW: Public Works Director $366.30
110: PUBLIC WORKS PW: Senior Management Analyst $206.51 174: PARAMEDIC SERVICES 174: Paramedic: Administrative Clerk II $46.11 174: PARAMEDIC SERVICES 174: Paramedic: Ambulance Operator $60.32 174: PARAMEDIC SERVICES 174: Paramedic: Emergency Medical Services Manager $167.51 174: PARAMEDIC SERVICES 174: Paramedic: Fire Captain $278.18 174: PARAMEDIC SERVICES 174: Paramedic: Fire Engineer $245.44 174: PARAMEDIC SERVICES 174: Paramedic: Firefighter $206.97 174: PARAMEDIC SERVICES 174: Paramedic: Human Resources Technician $110.29 280: HOUSING SUCCESSOR 280: Housing: Administrative Clerk II $100.34 280: HOUSING SUCCESSOR 280: Housing: Senior Management Analyst $191.85 420: WATER UTILITY 420: Water: Accounting Technician I $109.73 420: WATER UTILITY 420: Water: Accounting Technician II $116.67 420: WATER UTILITY 420: Water: Administrative Clerk II $73.60 420: WATER UTILITY 420: Water: Assistant City Engineer $273.35 420: WATER UTILITY 420: Water: City Engineer $263.10
420: WATER UTILITY 420: Water: Environmental Services Coordinator $221.63 420: WATER UTILITY 420: Water: Environmental Services Inspector $173.03 420: WATER UTILITY 420: Water: Executive Assistant $142.59 420: WATER UTILITY 420: Water: Financial Services Manager $284.81 420: WATER UTILITY 420: Water: Fiscal Specialist $154.68 420: WATER UTILITY 420: Water: Public Works Director $336.11 420: WATER UTILITY 420: Water: Senior Management Analyst $189.49 420: WATER UTILITY 420: Water: Water Distribution Crew Leader $154.84 420: WATER UTILITY 420: Water: Water Distribution Operator I $120.33 420: WATER UTILITY 420: Water: Water Distribution Operator II $142.75 420: WATER UTILITY 420: Water: Water Distribution Superintendent $269.74 420: WATER UTILITY 420: Water: Water Distribution Supervisor $204.86 430: SEWER UTILITY 430: Sewer: Accounting Technician I $101.19 430: SEWER UTILITY 430: Sewer: Accounting Technician II $107.59 25 Comprehensive User Fee Study
City of Brea - User Fee Study
Fully Burdened Hourly Rate Calculation
Department Title
Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate
430: SEWER UTILITY 430: Sewer: Administrative Clerk II $67.87 430: SEWER UTILITY 430: Sewer: Assistant City Engineer $252.09 430: SEWER UTILITY 430: Sewer: City Engineer $242.64
430: SEWER UTILITY 430: Sewer: Environmental Services Coordinator $204.39 430: SEWER UTILITY 430: Sewer: Environmental Services Inspector $159.57 430: SEWER UTILITY 430: Sewer: Executive Assistant $131.50 430: SEWER UTILITY 430: Sewer: Fiscal Specialist $142.65 430: SEWER UTILITY 430: Sewer: Maintenance Services Worker I $90.59 430: SEWER UTILITY 430: Sewer: Maintenance Services Worker II $121.85 430: SEWER UTILITY 430: Sewer: Public Works Director $309.97 430: SEWER UTILITY 430: Sewer: Water Distribution Superintendent $248.75 430: SEWER UTILITY 430: Sewer: Water Distribution Supervisor $188.92 440: SANITATION & ST SWEEPING 440: Sanitation: Accounting Technician I $121.10 440: SANITATION & ST SWEEPING 440: Sanitation: Accounting Technician II $128.76 440: SANITATION & ST SWEEPING 440: Sanitation: Administrative Clerk II $81.22 440: SANITATION & ST SWEEPING 440: Sanitation: Executive Assistant $157.36 440: SANITATION & ST SWEEPING 440: Sanitation: Fiscal Specialist $170.71 440: SANITATION & ST SWEEPING 440: Sanitation: Maintenance Services Crew Leader $167.68 440: SANITATION & ST SWEEPING 440: Sanitation: Maintenance Services Superintendent $223.50 440: SANITATION & ST SWEEPING 440: Sanitation: Maintenance Services Supervisor $198.05 440: SANITATION & ST SWEEPING 440: Sanitation: Management Analyst I $147.81 440: SANITATION & ST SWEEPING 440: Sanitation: Public Works Director $370.94 440: SANITATION & ST SWEEPING 440: Sanitation: Senior Management Analyst $209.13 440: SANITATION & ST SWEEPING 440: Sanitation: Street Sweeper Operator $148.17 26 Comprehensive User Fee Study
City of Brea - User Fee Study
Fully Burdened Hourly Rate Calculation
Department Title
Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate
Part Time/Contract Positions
110: POLICE SERVICES Police Cadet $23.30
110: POLICE SERVICES Jailer $53.26
110: POLICE SERVICES Parking Control Officer $47.40
110: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Administrative Intern $25.31 110: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Code Enforcement Officer $25.31 110: COMMUNITY SERVICES Facilities Worker $31.06
110: COMMUNITY SERVICES Sr. Community Services Leader $31.06 110: COMMUNITY SERVICES Community Services Leader $28.24 110: COMMUNITY SERVICES Community Services Worker $25.68 110: COMMUNITY SERVICES Community Services Coordinator $34.18 110: COMMUNITY SERVICES Senior Lifeguard/Instructor $31.08 110: COMMUNITY SERVICES Lifeguard/Instructor $28.24
110: COMMUNITY SERVICES Lifeguard $25.68
110: COMMUNITY SERVICES Shuttle Driver $47.95
110: COMMUNITY SERVICES Specialist/Inspector $143.69
440: SANITATION & ST SWEEPING Recycling Coordinator $32.30 110: PUBLIC WORKS Contract Labor: Consultant Plan Check Rate $234.61 110: PUBLIC WORKS Contract Labor: Consultant Inspection Rate $215.95 110: BUILDING Contract Labor: Consultant Building Plan Check Rate $184.07 110: BUILDING Contract Labor: Consultant Building Inspection Rate $163.62 110: FIRE SERVICES Contract Labor: Consultant Fire Plan Check Rate $221.33 27 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Appendix C – Cost Recovery Analysis
The following tables provide the results of the analysis, resulting full cost recovery amount, and recommended fees. For fees, services, and penalties in which the full cost, existing fee, and suggested fee is listed as “NA,” the amount or percentage was not calculable. This is most common when either the current or the suggested fee includes a variable component that is not comparable on a one-to-one basis, a full cost was not calculated (for penalties, fines, market-based fees, or items not included in the study), or when there is not a current fee amount to compare against.

Administrative Services
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ1 Miscellaneous2 Subpoena (For Non-Peace Employees) $275.00 per day Mandated by GC68096.1 NA NA $275.00 $0 3 Digital Reproduction for Public Records Requests $5.00 per DVD's no charge if they bring their own. GC7922.530(a) $5.00 0% $5.00 $0 4 Candidate Filing Fee $10.00 Mandated by Ord No. 527 NA NA $10.00 $05 Copies $0.10 per page GC7922.530(a) $0.10 0% $0.10 $06 Notary Fee $15.00 per signature GC8211 NA NA $15.00 $0 7 Returned Check (1st Offense) $25.00 NA NA $25.00 $08 Returned Check (2nd Offense or more) $35.00 NA NA $35.00 $0 9 Utility Research Assistance Fee $38.00 per request $139.31 0% $139.00 $101 10 Business License11 Massage Establishment Permit $750.00 Livescan fee included $689.13 0% $689.00 -$6112 Massage Establishment Permit - Renewal $500.00 $689.13 0% $689.00 $189 13 Replacement of Massage Permit $25.00 $134.53 0% $134.00 $10914 Renewal for Expired Massage Permit (Late Fee) 10%/month X annual fee for Massage Establishment NA NA 10%/month X annual fee for Massage Establishment $0 15 Service Fee New
This fee is intended to recover the costs associated with processing card payments, ACH transfers, and other electronic transactions, whether conducted online or in person NA NA
The service fee shall vary based on the rate negotiated with the thirdparty vendor. In no event shall the service fee exceed 6% for vendors without a minimum per-transaction charge. For vendors with a contractually established minimum per-transaction charge, the City shall not impose a service fee exceeding $4.00 per transaction without further City Council approval NA
28 Water Utility Billing
Item No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 New Account/Application Fee $45.00 $138.58 50% $69.00 $242 Past Due Notice $10.00 NA NA $10.00 $03 After Hours Service $90.00 $576.46 50% $288.00 $1984 Cut Lock / Broken Lock / Missing Lock $60.00 $190.43 0% $190.00 $1305 Meter Abandonment $100.00 $219.59 0% $219.00 $1196 Monthly Maintenance Fee for Accounts w/Backflow Devices $7.00 NA NA $7.00 $0
7 Intentional Damage to Meter $120.00 plus cost of equipment $370.08 0% $370.00 $250 8 Broken Angle Stop $45.00 per hour plus cost of equipment $673.42 0% $673.00 $628 9 Unauthorized turn-on or turn-off Meter Register $30.00 $142.08 1% $140.00 $11010 Broken or Missing Meter Register $45.00 per hour plus cost of equipment $151.76 1% $150.00 $105 11 Unauthorized Use of Hydrant for Filling Water Truck (Per Occurrence) $350.00 Plus cost of water NA NA $350.00 $0 12 Delinquent Service Charge
10% of Outstanding Balance
NA NA 10% of Outstanding balance $0
13 Meter Re-Reads & Efficiency Checks (Customer Initiated) $30.00 $70.00 0% $70.00 $4014 Water Shut Off Charge $65.00 NA NA $65.00 $015 Hang Tag Charges $30.00 NA NA $50.00 $2016 Temporary Construction Meter Processing Fee $100.00 $151.09 1% $150.00 $50 29 Water Utility Billing
Item No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 17 Construction Water - Use of City Equipment $2,650.00 (deposit) NA NA $2,650 (deposit) $018 Lock-on Meter Fee $40.00 NA NA $100.00 $60 Note: Deposit based fees are subject to change based upon direction of the Community Development Director or designee per Municipal Code 3.32.035. 30 Planning
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 1 Annexation Request $5,000.00 deposit NA NA $5,000.00 deposit $02 Appeal Processing (residents - non-applicant) $50.00 flat fee $2,005.62 63% $750.00 flat fee $7003 Appeal Processing (non-residents & applicant) $1,000.00 deposit NA NA $2,000.00 deposit $1,0004 Certificate of Compatibility $1,000.00 deposit NA NA $2,000.00 deposit $1,0005 Conditional Use Permit - New Construction $2,000.00 deposit NA NA $4,000.00 deposit $2,0006 Conditional Use Permit - Others New Flat fee $4,161.71 4% $4,000.00 Flat fee NA7 Conditional Use Permit - Amendment New deposit/flat fee NA NA 50% of original fee deposit/flat fee NA 8 Minor Conditional Use Permit $1,000.00 deposit $1,531.95 2% $1,500.00 Flat Fee $5009 Development Agreement $2,000.00 deposit NA NA $5,000.00 deposit $3,00010 Entertainment Permit $550.00 Deposit $1,266.64 5% $1,200.00 flat fee $65011 Environmental Review (CEQA) $2,000.00 deposit NA NA Varies by Project deposit NA12 General Plan Amendment $2,000.00 deposit NA NA $10,000.00 deposit $8,000 31 Planning
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 13 General Plan Maintenance Fee $1.96
per $1,000 of construction value
$2.76 0% $2.76
per $1,000 of construction value
$1
14 Planning Entitlement/Plan Check Management
Rate $175.00 per hour $249.38 0% $249.00 per hour $74
15 Planning Entitlement/Plan Check Regular Rate $109.00 per hour $129.72 1% $129.00 per hour $2016 Planning Entitlement/Plan Check Supervisory Rate New per hour $161.73 0% $161.00 per hour NA
17 Expedited Planning Plan Check Rate(case by case basis at the direction of Director or designee) New per hour $270.41 0% $270.00 per hour NA
18 Precise Development - New Construction $2,000.00 deposit NA NA $2,500.00 deposit $50019 Precise Development - Others New Flat fee $2,539.37 2% $2,500.00 flat fee NA20 Special Projects $2,000.00 deposit NA NA Varies - as determined appropriate per CD Director deposit NA21 Specific Plan $2,000.00 deposit NA NA $10,000.00 deposit $8,00022 Specific Plan Amendment $2,000.00 deposit NA NA $7,500.00 deposit $5,50023 Temporary Trailer $500.00 deposit NA NA $1,500.00 deposit $1,00024 Zone Change $2,000.00 deposit NA NA $10,000.00 deposit $8,00025 Variance $2,000.00 deposit NA NA $2,000.00 deposit $026 Zoning Ordinance Amendment $2,000.00 deposit NA NA $5,000.00 deposit $3,000 32 Planning
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 27 Temporary Use Permit - Large Events $300.00 NA NA $850.00 deposit $55028 Temporary Use Permit - Others New Flat Fee $870.32 2% $850.00 flat fee NA29 Historic Preservation Listing $250.00 Deposit NA NA $250.00 deposit $030 Mills Act Contract $250.00 Deposit $2,030.09 1% $2,000.00 flat fee $1,75031 Film Permit - Large Scale New NA NA $650.00 Deposit NA32 Film Permit - Small Scale $500.00 Deposit $668.95 3% $650.00 flat fee $15033 Temporary Signs/Banners $85.00 flat fee $129.72 34% $85.00 flat fee $034 Preliminary Plan Review $2,000.00 deposit $2,537.51 1% $2,500.00 flat fee $50035 Tentative Parcel/Tract Map - Regular $2,000.00 deposit NA NA $5,000.00 deposit $3,00036 Tentative Parcel/Tract Map - Ministerial $2,000.00 deposit NA NA $2,000.00 deposit $037 Tree Removal Permit (up to 5 trees) $500.00 Deposit $570.37 4% $550.00 flat fee $5038 Tree Removal Permit (6+ trees) New Flat fee $822.32 3% $800.00 flat fee NA39 Zoning Verification Letter $291.00 Flat fee $404.39 1% $400.00 flat fee $10940 Plan Review - New Construction $2,000.00 deposit NA NA $2,000.00 deposit $041 Plan Review - Others $1,000.00 Flat fee $1,538.43 2% $1,500.00 flat fee $500 33 Planning
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 42 Administrative Remedy $500.00 deposit $768.44 2% $750.00 flat fee $25043 Administrative Interpretation New Flat fee $1,074.40 7% $1,000.00 flat fee NA44 Encroachment License Agreement New flat fee $525.02 5% $500.00 flat fee NA NOTE:Deposit based fees are subject to change based upon direction of the Community Development Director or designee per Municipal Code 3.32.035.If contract services are provided, will be billed at Actual Cost plus Indirect %If a project requires multiple applications that require both deposit and flat fee, it will be processed as a deposit based applicationIf a project requires multiple flat fee applications, the City will charge highest flat fee required + 25% of each flat fee 34 Building & Safety
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 1 Parking Permit2 Initial Parking Permit Application and Renewal Application Permit (In- Person) $34.00 $70.16 0% $70.00 flat $36 3 Initial Parking Permit Application and Renewal Application Permit (Online) $22.00 $46.77 2% $46.00 flat $24 4 Overnight Parking Permit Appeals $30.00 $117.88 1% $117.00 $875 Development Fee6 Building Permit Technician Rate New per hour $93.55 1% $93.00 NA7 Building Plan Check Rate $130.00 per hour $157.88 1% $157.00 per hour $278 Expedited Building Plan Check Rate (case by case basis at the direction of Director or designee) New per hour $283.49 1% $280.00 per hour NA 9 Building Management Rate $188.00 per hour $189.00 1% $188.00 $010 Building Inspection Rate $146.00 per hour $146.08 0% $146.00 $011 Building Inspection Outside Normal Business Hours (4 hrs Min.) $219.00 per hour $981.71 0% $981.00 $76212 Building callback inspections/re-inspections $146.00 per hour $146.08 0% $146.00 $013 Building Inspection (When Building Fires Occurs During Working Hours) New $377.99 0% $377.00 NA 14 Building Inspection (When Building Fires Occurs During Non-Working Hours) New $755.99 0% $755.00 NA 15 Grading Miscellaneous - Inspection Outside Normal Business Hrs (Min. 4 hrs) $219.00 per hour $876.50 0% $876.00 $657 16 Records Management Fee .0001 x valuation (Valuation =$1 per square foot) NA NA .0001 x valuation (Valuation =$1 per square foot) $0 17 Green Building Standards Fee $4 per $100,000 valuation; minimum $1 NA NA $4 per $100,000 valuation; minimum $1 $0 18 Seismic Fee (residential) .00013 x valuation NA NA .00013 x valuation $019 Seismic Fee (Non-residential) .00028 x valuation NA NA .00028 x valuation $020 Technology Fee (For Permitting System) 0.08% of Construction Permit Valuation 0.21% 3% 0.20% 0.12% 21 General Maintenance Fee .00196 x valuation (Valuation Varies) 0.00276% 0% 0.00276% 0.001%22 Permit Issuance Fees - Building & Safety Division $40.00 per permit (included in FLAT fees) $93.55 1% $93.00 $5323 Certificate of Occupancy - Ownership Change $125.00 $393.25 0% $393.00 $26824 Certificate of Occupancy - All Others $313.00 $715.64 0% $715.00 $40225 Certificate of Occupancy - Temporary (TCO) $168.00 $585.92 0% $585.00 $41726 Grading Permit27 Mass/Rough Grading Plan Check - Initial Fee Includes 3 reviews New Per Sheet $1,393.07 0% $1,393.00 flat NA28 Mass/Rough Grading Plan Check - 4th and subsequent reviews New Per Sheet $464.36 12% $410.00 flat NA29 Precise Grading Plan Check - Initial Fee Includes 3 reviews New Per Sheet $2,371.10 0% $2,371.00 flat NA30 Precise Grading Plan Check - 4th and subsequent reviews New Per Sheet $790.37 23% $610.00 flat NA31 Mass/Rough Grading Inspection - 0 - 100 CY Deposit based $736.28 0% $736.00 flat NA32 Mass/Rough Grading Inspection - 101-1,000 CY New Each additional 100 CY over 100 CY (prorated per CY - $127.00) $2,617.89 0% $2,617.00 flat NA 33 Mass/Rough Grading Inspection - 1,001 - 10,000 CY New Each additional 1000 CY(prorated per CY - $427) $7,199.19 0% $7,199.00 flat NA34 Mass/Rough Grading Inspection - 10,001- 100,000 CY New each additional 10,000 CY (prorated per CY $391.00) $12,434.97 0% $12,434.00 flat NA35 Mass/Rough Grading Inspection - >100,000 CY Plus $ 8,919.00 ( New each additional 10,000 CY or portion thereof over 100,00 CY (prorated per cubic yard $338.00). $17,997.98 0% $17,997.00 flat NA36 Studies (Hydrology, WQMP,Geotechnical Reports………) Deposit NA NA Actual Cost $037 Deposit Program38 Industrial Buildings - 0-10,000 sq. ft. $900.00 Plan Check Amt. NA NA $5,000.00 Deposit $4,10039 Industrial Buildings - 0-10,000 sq. ft. $1,300.00 Inspection Amt. NA NA $4,500.00 Deposit $3,20040 Industrial Buildings - 10,000-30,000 sq. ft. $2,350.00 Plan Check Amt. NA NA $7,000.00 Deposit $4,65041 Industrial Buildings - 10,000-30,000 sq. ft. $3,650.00 Inspection Amt. NA NA $7,000.00 Deposit $3,35042 Industrial Buildings - 30,000-60,000 sq. ft. $4,550.00 Plan Check Amt. NA NA $10,000.00 Deposit $5,45043 Industrial Buildings - 30,000-60,000 sq. ft. $7,150.00 Inspection Amt. NA NA $10,000.00 Deposit $2,85044 Industrial Buildings - 60,000-100,000 sq. ft $10,150.00 Plan Check Amt. NA NA $12,000.00 Deposit $1,85045 Industrial Buildings - 60,000-100,000 sq. ft $15,600.00 Inspection Amt. NA NA $12,000.00 Deposit -$3,600 35 Building & Safety
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 46 Industrial Buildings - 100,000+ sq. ft. To be determined by Building Official Plan Check Amt. NA NA $25,000.00 Deposit NA 47 Industrial Buildings - 100,000+ sq. ft. To be determined by Building Official Inspection Amt. NA NA $25,000.00 Deposit NA 48 Commercial Buildings - 0-5,000 sq. ft. $1,000.00 Plan Check Amt. NA NA $4,000.00 Deposit $3,00049 Commercial Buildings - 0 -5,000 sq. ft. $1,550.00 Inspection Amt. NA NA $4,000.00 Deposit $2,45050 Commercial Buildings - 5,001-10,000 sq. ft. $2,600.00 Plan Check Amt. NA NA $6,000.00 Deposit $3,40051 Commercial Buildings - 5,001-10,000 sq. ft. $4,000.00 Inspection Amt. NA NA $6,500.00 Deposit $2,50052 Commercial Buildings - 10,001-30,000 sq. ft. $5,200.00 Plan Check Amt. NA NA $8,000.00 Deposit $2,80053 Commercial Buildings - 10,001-30,000 sq. ft. $7,900.00 Inspection Amt. NA NA $10,000.00 Deposit $2,10054 Commercial Buildings - 30,001-60,000 sq. ft $8,600.00 Plan Check Amt. NA NA $10,000.00 Deposit $1,40055 Commercial Buildings - 30,001-60,000 sq. ft $13,100.00 Inspection Amt. NA NA $14,000.00 Deposit $90056 Commercial Buildings - 60,001 - 100,000 sq. ft. $8,600.00 Plan Check Amt. NA NA $12,000.00 Deposit $3,40057 Commercial Buildings - 60,001 - 100,000 sq. ft. $13,100.00 Inspection Amt. NA NA $16,000.00 Deposit $2,90058 Commercial Buildings - 100,000+ sq. ft. $11,000.00 Plan Check Amt. NA NA $20,000.00 Deposit $9,00059 Commercial Buildings - 100,000+ sq. ft. $16,900.00 Inspection Amt. NA NA $20,000.00 Deposit $3,10060 Multi-Family Residential - 0-5,000 sq. ft. $1,400.00 Plan Check Amt. NA NA $6,000.00 Deposit $4,60061 Multi-Family Residential - 0-5,000 sq. ft. $2,200.00 Inspection Amt. NA NA $6,000.00 Deposit $3,80062 Multi-Family Residential - 5,001-10,000 sq. ft. $1,400.00 Plan Check Amt. NA NA $10,000.00 Deposit $8,60063 Multi-Family Residential - 5,001-10,000 sq. ft. $2,200.00 Inspection Amt. NA NA $10,000.00 Deposit $7,80064 Multi-Family Residential - 10,001-30,000 sq. ft. $3,650.00 Plan Check Amt. NA NA $12,000.00 Deposit $8,35065 Multi-Family Residential - 10,001-30,000 sq. ft. $5,600.00 Inspection Amt. NA NA $14,000.00 Deposit $8,40066 Multi-Family Residential - 30,001 - 60,000 sq. ft $7,150.00 Plan Check Amt. NA NA $18,000.00 Deposit $10,85067 Multi-Family Residential - 30,001 - 60,000 sq. ft $10,900.00 Inspection Amt. NA NA $20,000.00 Deposit $9,10068 Multi-Family Residential - 60,000+ sq. ft $8,450.00 Plan Check Amt. NA NA $24,000.00 Deposit $15,55069 Multi-Family Residential - 60,000+ sq. ft $3,000.00 Inspection Amt. NA NA $24,000.00 Deposit $21,00070 Group R-3 (Construction Type IIIB, VA, VB)71 One and Two Family Dwellings (Including ADU's) - 0 - 999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $3,743.66 0% $3,743.00 flat NA 72 One and Two Family Dwellings (Including ADU's) - 1000 -1,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $4,339.78 0% $4,339.00 flat NA 73 One and Two Family Dwellings - 2000 -2,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $4,982.66 0% $4,982.00 flat NA 74 One and Two Family Dwellings - 3000 -3,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $5,558.20 0% $5,558.00 flat NA 75 One and Two Family Dwellings - 4000 -4,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $6,322.74 0% $6,322.00 flat NA 76 One and Two Family Dwellings - 5,000 -6,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $7,005.73 0% $7,005.00 flat NA 77 One and Two Family Dwellings - 7,000 -8,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $8,752.74 0% $8,752.00 flat NA 78 One and Two Family Dwellings - 9,000+ sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New NA NA To be determined by the Building Official flat NA79 Group R-3 (Construction Type IIB, IIIA, IV)80 One and Two Family Dwellings (Including ADU's) - 0 - 999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $4,848.39 0% $4,848.00 flat NA 81 One and Two Family Dwellings (Including ADU's) - 1000 -1,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $5,280.88 0% $5,280.00 flat NA 82 One and Two Family Dwellings - 2000 -2,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $7,069.10 0% $7,069.00 flat NA 83 One and Two Family Dwellings - 3000 -3,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $7,644.64 0% $7,644.00 flat NA 84 One and Two Family Dwellings - 4000 -4,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $8,314.67 0% $8,314.00 flat NA 85 One and Two Family Dwellings - 5,000 -6,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $9,206.32 0% $9,206.00 flat NA 86 One and Two Family Dwellings - 7,000 -8,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $10,953.32 0% $10,953.00 flat NA 36 Building & Safety
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 87 One and Two Family Dwellings - 9,000+ sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New NA NA To be determined by the Building Official flat NA88 Group R-3 (Construction Type IA, IB, IIA)89 One and Two Family Dwellings (Including ADU's) - 0 - 999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $7,325.85 0% $7,325.00 flat NA 90 One and Two Family Dwellings (Including ADU's) - 1000 -1,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $7,823.71 0% $7,823.00 flat NA 91 One and Two Family Dwellings - 2000 -2,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $9,022.82 0% $9,022.00 flat NA 92 One and Two Family Dwellings - 3000 -3,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $10,699.90 0% $10,699.00 flat NA 93 One and Two Family Dwellings - 4000 -4,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $11,722.51 0% $11,722.00 flat NA 94 One and Two Family Dwellings - 5,000 -6,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $12,745.13 0% $12,745.00 flat NA 95 One and Two Family Dwellings - 7,000 -8,999 sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New $14,504.52 0% $14,504.00 flat NA 96 One and Two Family Dwellings - 9,000+ sq. ft (3 plan reviews included) New NA NA To be determined by the Building Official flat NA97 Group A,B,E,F,I,M,S (Construction Type IIIB, VA, VB)98 Tenant Improvement - 0 - 1,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $3,598.80 0% $3,598.00 flat NA99 Tenant Improvement - 2,000 - 4,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $4,356.34 0% $4,356.00 flat NA100 Tenant Improvement - 5,000 - 9,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $5,499.49 0% $5,499.00 flat NA101 Tenant Improvement - 10,000 - 24,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $7,388.60 0% $7,388.00 flat NA102 Tenant Improvement - 25,000 - 49,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $8,307.54 0% $8,307.00 flat NA103 Tenant Improvement - 50,000 - 49,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $9,262.36 0% $9,262.00 flat NA104 Tenant Improvement - 50,000 - 75,000 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $10,378.52 0% $10,378.00 flat NA105 Tenant Improvement - Over 75,000 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New NA NA To be determined by the Building Official flat NA106 Group A,B,E,F,I,M,S (Construction Type IIB, IIIA, IV)107 Tenant Improvement - 0 - 1,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $4,110.10 0% $4,110.00 flat NA108 Tenant Improvement - 2,000 - 4,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $5,010.81 0% $5,010.00 flat NA109 Tenant Improvement - 5,000 - 9,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $6,522.11 0% $6,522.00 flat NA110 Tenant Improvement - 10,000 - 24,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $8,083.98 0% $8,083.00 flat NA111 Tenant Improvement - 25,000 - 49,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $9,002.92 0% $9,002.00 flat NA112 Tenant Improvement - 50,000 - 49,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $10,653.36 0% $10,653.00 flat NA113 Tenant Improvement - 50,000 - 75,000 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $11,442.28 0% $11,442.00 flat NA114 Tenant Improvement - Over 75,000 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New NA NA To be determined by the Building Official flat NA115 Group A,B,E,F,I,M,S (Construction Type IA, IB,IIA)116 Tenant Improvement - 0 - 1,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $4,899.98 0% $4,899.00 flat NA117 Tenant Improvement - 2,000 - 4,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $6,127.92 0% $6,127.00 flat NA118 Tenant Improvement - 5,000 - 9,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $7,871.96 0% $7,871.00 flat NA119 Tenant Improvement - 10,000 - 24,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $9,761.06 0% $9,761.00 flat NA120 Tenant Improvement - 25,000 - 49,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $10,680.01 0% $10,680.00 flat NA121 Tenant Improvement - 50,000 - 49,999 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $12,330.44 0% $12,330.00 flat NA122 Tenant Improvement - 50,000 - 75,000 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $15,123.69 0% $15,123.00 flat NA 37 Building & Safety
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 123 Tenant Improvement - Over 75,000 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New NA NA To be determined by the Building Official NA124 Business Signs (Up to 3 signs, same charge for additional 3 signs) (up to 3 plan reviews) $80 / $120 $458.69 0% $458.00 $338 125 Group U Occupancy (Construction Type VA,VB,IIIB)126 Garage / Workshop / Green House - 0 - 1,000 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $2,141.78 0% $2,141.00 flat NA 127 Garage / Workshop / GreenHouse -1,001 - 3,000 sq. ft (3 plan review included) New $2,600.47 0% $2,600.00 flat NA 128 Garage / Workshop / Greenhouse- 3,000 + sq. ft (3 plan review included) New NA NA To be determined by the Building Official NA 129 Miscellaneous - Wood deck, patio enclosure, fire damage, minor demolition, spray booth, storage rack (up to 3 plan reviews) deposit based $1,068.08 0% $1,068.00 flat NA 130 Miscellaneous - All other items not otherwise identified $200 / $300 $1,068.08 0% $1,068.00 flat $768131 Miscellaneous - General residential minor repairs $55 / $80 $285.14 0% $285.00 flat $205132 Patio Cover/ Latice/Wood Deck/Porch (Not Enclosed) up to 500 square feet (Up to 3 Plan Reviews) Deposit Program $870.62 0% $870.00 flat NA 133 Patio Cover/Lattice/Wood Deck/Porch (Not Enclosed) each additional 250 square feet (up to 3 plan reviews) New $370.45 0% $370.00 flat NA 134 Enclosed Patio Cover up to 500 square feet (Up to 3 Plan Reviews) New $989.20 0% $989.00 flat NA135 Enclosed Patio Cover each additional 250 square feet (up to 3 plan reviews) New $435.31 0% $435.00 flat NA 136 Landscape Permit137 Landscape Plan Check 138 Base Fee (3 submittals) New per sheet $1,464.85 0% $1,464.00 NA139 Each additional submittal New per sheet $274.84 0% $274.00 NA140 Landscape Inspection141 less than 0.5 acres New $6,792.39 0% $6,792.00 NA142 >.5 to 1 Acres New $11,689.17 0% $11,689.00 NA143 >1-1.5 Acres New $15,153.16 0% $15,153.00 NA144 >1.5 - 2 Acres New $16,980.98 0% $16,980.00 NA145 2 - 2.5 Acres New $18,808.80 0% $18,808.00 NA146 Each additional 1/2 acre > 2.5 New $2,087.25 0% $2,087.00 NA147 Additional Inspections or re-inspections New per hour $163.62 0% $163.00 NA148 Electrical Permit149 Multi-family Residential Buildings (Apartments, Motels, Hotels & Condo & non-residential construction (tenant improvements) - per 100 square feet New per 100 sq ft / single item $21.18 1% $21.00 NA
150
Multi-family Residential Buildings (Apartments, Motels, Hotels & Condo & non-residential construction (tenant improvements) - each additional square feet New each square feet after $0.21 1% $0.21 NA
151 New Single and Two Family buildings - per 100 square feet New per 100 sq ft / single item $24.86 3% $24.00 NA152 New Single and Two Family buildings - each additional square feet New each square feet after $0.25 3% $0.24 NA153 Garages, Carports, Covered Patios (attached or detached) Misc structures - per 100 square feet New per 100 sq ft / single item $11.98 8% $11.00 NA 154 Garages, Carports, Covered Patios (attached or detached) Misc structures - each additional square feet New each square feet after $0.12 0% $0.12 NA 38 Building & Safety
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 155 Mechanical Permit156 Mechanical Permit New NA NA 80% of electrical NA157 Plumbing Permit158 Plumbing Permit New NA NA 80% of electrical NA159 Miscellaneous Fees160 Training Surcharge (AB 717) New Per permit $3.00 0% $3.00 NA161 Deferred Submittal plan check Fee for flat fee based projects New per hour (2 hrs min.) $184.07 0% $184.00 NA162 Permit Renewal Fee New NA NA All of original fee NA163 Plan Check Renewal Fee for flat fee based projects New NA NA All of original fee NA164 Expediated Plan Check New per hour (2 hrs min.) $276.11 0% $276.00 per hour NA165 Drywall (< 400 Sq. Ft.) New Each $268.81 0% $268.00 NA166 Drywall additional 100 sq. ft. New each 100 sq. ft. $34.59 2% $34.00 NA167 Stucco (< 400 Sq. Ft.) New Each $350.62 0% $350.00 NA168 Stucco additional 100 sq. ft. New each 100 $47.68 1% $47.00 NA169 Siding (< 400 Sq. Ft.) New Each $268.81 0% $268.00 NA170 Siding additional 100 sq. ft. New each 100 sq. ft. $34.59 2% $34.00 NA171 New Window or opening New Each $164.49 0% $164.00 NA172 Additional window or opening New Each $70.55 1% $70.00 NA173 Window or door Replacement New Up to 5 windows $334.37 0% $334.00 NA174 additional 5 windows (Each) New $120.94 1% $120.00 NA175 Roof Solar Tube New Each $305.59 0% $305.00 NA176 Skylight New Each (Less than 10 sq. Ft.) $387.40 0% $387.00 NA177 Skylight New Each (Greater than 10 sq. Ft. or structural) $505.98 0% $505.00 NA178 Light Pole New Each (All trades) $836.10 0% $836.00 NA179 Additional light pole New each additional $141.10 0% $141.00 NA180 Flag Pole New Each $530.51 0% $530.00 NA181 Non-structural Re-Roofing - For the first 3,000 square feet $335.00 deposit $328.98 0% $328.00 flat -$7182 Non-structural - each additional 1,000 square foot New $93.94 1% $93.00 flat NA183 Structural Re-Roofing - For the first 2,000 square feet New $470.08 0% $470.00 flat NA184 Structural Re-roofing- each additional 1,000 square foot New $235.04 0% $235.00 flat NA185 Non-Retaining Block Wall up to 100 linear feet (City Standard Details) Engineer Design fees to be determined by BO Deposit Program $275.25 0% $275.00 flat NA 186 Non-Retaining Block Wall - each additional 100 linear feet (City Standard Details) Engineer Design fees to be determined by BO New $137.62 0% $137.00 flat NA 187 City Standard Retaining Wall for up to four feet high, up to 50 linear feet Deposit Program $458.69 0% $458.00 flat NA 188 City Standard Retaining Wall each additional 50 linear feet New $229.35 0% $229.00 flat NA189 Non-City Standard Retaining Wall for up to six feet high, up to 50 linear feet - Residential Foundation Repair (up to 3 plan reviews) New $599.80 0% $599.00 flat NA 190 Non-City Standard Retaining Wall each additional 50 linear feet - Residential Foundation Repair (up to 3 plan reviews) New $299.90 0% $299.00 flat NA 191 Non-City Standard Retaining Wall for up to nine feet high, up to 50 linear feet (up to 3 plan reviews) Deposit Program $859.48 0% $859.00 flat NA 192 Non-City Standard Retaining Wall each additional 50 linear feet New $370.45 0% $370.00 flat NA193 Pool / Spa (Up to 500 sq. ft.) (up to 3 plan reviews) Deposit Program $1,136.62 0% $1,136.00 flat NA194 Pool / Spa ( 500 sq. ft. to 1000 sq. ft.) (up to 3 plan reviews) New $1,864.42 0% $1,864.00 flat NA195 Pool / Spa (Greater than 1000 sq. ft.) (up to 3 plan reviews) New $2,555.44 0% $2,555.00 flat NA196 Small Appliances - For the first appliance $50.00 $105.20 0% $105.00 flat $55197 Temporary Trailer $500.00 deposit $414.86 0% $414.00 flat -$86198 Other Fees 39 Building & Safety
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ 199 Administrative Penalty Fee
1st Offense - Not to Exceed $100; 2nd Offense - Not to Exceed $200; 3rd Offense -Not to Exceed $500. The sum of all fines for the same violation is not to exceed $1,000 citations NA NA
1st Offense - Not to Exceed $100; 2nd Offense - Not to Exceed $200; 3rd Offense -Not to Exceed $500. The sum of all fines for the same violation is not to exceed $1,000 $0
200 Special Inspector Registration (Each Certification) New Each Certification $330.27 0% $330.00 NA201 ADA Hardship Exemption Form (Processing, review & approval) New per hour (Min. 4 hours) $189.00 0% $189.00 NA202 Building Code Modification Form or Alternate Means & Methods Form (Processing, review &approval) New per hour (5 hr Min.) $189.00 0% $189.00 NA 203 Temporary Structures/Buildings (Event stages, Event Tents, Construction Trailers,…….) New $759.27 0% $759.00 NA 204 Non-Residential Solar Permit 1,000.00 plus $7 per kW for each kW between 51kW and 250kW, and $5 for each kW above 250 kW Regulated NA NA $1,000.00 $0205 Residential Energy Storage System Permit 450.00 Recently
adopted /
Regulated
$452.81 1% $450.00 $0
206 Non-Residential Energy Storage System Permit 1,000.00 Regulated NA NA $1,000.00 $0207 Fire Sprinklers (Structural Review) New Building management rate (2 hrs min.) $377.99 0% $377.00 NA208 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (New Construction) New $468.51 0% $468.00 NA209 Processing for Change of Contractor, Architect or Owner New $235.77 0% $235.00 NA210 Reinstatement of Expired Building Application (at discretion of Building Official) Each Extension 168.00 $235.77 0% $235.00 $67 211 Reinstatement of Expired Permit (at discretion of Building Official) Each Extension 168.00 $235.77 0% $235.00 $67 NOTE:For Items not identified above, the Building Official will determine the applicable feesDeposit based fees are subject to change based upon direction of the Community Development Director or designee per Municipal Code 3.32.035. 40 FIRE SERVICES
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ1 Fire Prevention Inspection Fee $134.00 Small Business $111.78 1% $111.00 per hour/unit -$232 Fire Suppression Inspection Fee New Small Business $83.91 1% $83.00 per 1/2 hour NA3 Operational Fire Permit $209.00 initial permit $55.89 2% $55.00 each permit -$1544 Fire Plan Check Rate $133.00 per hour $218.02 0% $218.00 per hour $855 Fire Inspection Rate $133.00 per hour $111.78 1% $111.00 per hour -$226 Fire Permit Technician Rate New per hour $94.59 2% $93.00 per hour NA7 After Hours Fire Inspection Rate $133.00 per hour $167.67 0% $167.00 per hour $348 After Hours Plan Check Rate $133.00 per hour $327.02 0% $327.00 per hour $1949 Additional Fire re-inspection $133.00 per hour $111.78 1% $111.00 per hour -$2210 Expedited Fire Plan Check(case by case basis at the direction of Director or designee) $200.00 per hour based upon contract cost recovery rate $282.29 1% $280.00 per hour $80 11 Permit Issuance Fee $40.00 each permit $94.59 1% $94.00 each permit $5412 Fire Code Non-Compliance Fee for Re- inspection after 2nd re-inspection $231.50 NA NA $300.00 $69 13 Fire False Alarm Response $192.00 per occurrence after 3rd occurrence after 90 days, or 4th occurrence after 180 days $671.31 0% $671.00 per occurrence $47914 Fire Code Interpretation Fee $42.00 per hour ($84 minimum) $188.19 0% $188.00 per hour ($376 minimum) $146 15 Event Stand-by (2 hour minimum) $160.00 per hour ($320 minimum) $111.78 1% $111.00 per hour ($222 minimum) -$49 16 Special events permit/inspection fee New per hour based upon cost recovery rate $111.78 1% $111.00 per hour NA17 Special events permit/inspection fee - after hours New per hour based upon cost recovery rate $167.67 0% $167.00 per hour NA 19 AM&M Review New $188.19 0% $188.00 per hour NA20 IROL Specialty System Fee New per report $35.00 0% $35.00 per report NA21 Fire Marshal Inspection Fee New per hour $188.19 0% $188.00 per hour NA22 Hazardous Vegetation Inspection Initial Inspection
New Fee waived, if compliance is made within 30 days $111.78 1% $111.00 NA 23 Hazardous Vegetation Inspection Reinspection (2nd and 3rd Inspection) New NA NA $222.00 per inspection NA 24 Hazardous Vegetation Inspection Reinspection (4th and Subsequent Inspections) New NA NA $444.00 per inspection NA 25 EMS Related FeesSet and adjusted per Orange County EMS fee schedule (Policy #714.00) Set and adjusted per Orange County EMS fee schedule (Policy #714.00) NA NA
Set and adjusted per Orange County fee schedule
$0.00
18 AB38 inspection $133.00 $111.78 1% $111.00 -$22.00
41 FIRE SERVICES
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ26 First Responder Fee(Non Residents; Senior living, assisted living, residential care, skilled nursing, and long-term acute care facilities that are not meeting the expected standard of care or having excessive lift assist/ help up calls) New
Engine on Scene - No ambulance
Non Residents; Senior living, assisted living, residential care, skilled nursing, and long-term acute care facilities that are not meeting the expected standard of care or having excessive lift assist/ help up calls $834.86 50% $415.00 NA
27 Assessment FeeNon Residents; Senior living, assisted living, residential care, skilled nursing, and long-term acute care facilities that are not meeting the expected standard of care or having excessive lift assist/ help up calls New
Engine on Scene AND ambulance
Non Residents; Senior living, assisted living, residential care, skilled nursing, and long-term acute care facilities that are not meeting the expected standard of care or having excessive lift assist/ help up calls $1,218.84 66% $415.00 NA
28 Fire Permit Extension Fee New $169.62 1% $168.00 NA
NOTE:Deposit based fees are subject to change based upon direction of the Community Development Director or designee per Municipal Code 3.32.035. 42 Police
Item No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 Audio Duplication $35.00 per copy $85.80 39% $52.00 $172 Alarm System Application Permit (Residential) $25.00 $43.27 15% $37.00 $123 Alarm System Application Permit (Commercial) $25.00 $43.27 15% $37.00 $124 Brea False Alarm Fees (1st & 2nd False Alarm) Free NA NA Free $05 Brea False Alarm Fees (3rd False Alarm) $100.00 NA NA $100.00 $06 Brea False Alarm Fees (4th False Alarm) $125.00 NA NA $125.00 $07 Brea False Alarm Fees (All False Alarms over 4) $150.00 NA NA $150.00 $08 Citation Sign-Off $25.00 $28.13 0% $28.00 $39 Clearance Letter $25.00 $31.22 1% $31.00 $610 Local Records Check $15.00 NA NA $15.00 $011 Photographs - Digital $35.00 $51.40 32% $35.00 $012 Police Reports $3.00 NA NA $3.00 $013 Subpoenas $15.00 NA NA $15.00 $014 Subpoena requiring officer appearance (applies to Firefighters and Peace Officers) $275 per day (Mandated by GC68097.2) NA NA $275 per day (Mandated by GC68097.2) $0 15 Vehicle Releases (Stored) $110.00 $145.43 0% $145.00 $3516 Vehicle Releases (Impounded) $162.00 $207.15 0% $207.00 $4517 Vehicle Repossession Fee $15.00 NA NA $15.00 $0 43 Police
Item No. Title
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 18 Video Duplication $35.00 per copy $110.55 53% $52.00 $1719 Parking Fees Varies NA NA Varies $020 Towing Franchising $30.00 NA NA Per Contract Rate $0 44 Public Works
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ1 Development Hourly Rates 2 Public Works Plan Check Management Rate $167.00 Per Hour $286.74 0% $286.00 per Hour (FLAT) $1193 Public Works Plan Check Rate $171.00 Per Hour $220.32 0% $220.00 per Hour (FLAT) $494 Public Works Inspection Management Rate $168.00 Per Hour $286.74 0% $286.00 per Hour (FLAT) $1185 Public Works Inspection Rate $168.00 Per Hour $219.85 0% $219.00 per Hour (FLAT) $516 Public Works Permit Technician Rate New Per Hour $104.24 0% $104.00 per Hour (FLAT) NA7 Expedited Public Works Plan Check Rate (case by case basis at the direction of Director or designee) New per Hour $330.48 0% $330.00 per Hour (FLAT) NA 8 After Hour Rate (Public Works Inspection) (2 Hour Minimum) $252.00 Per Hour $329.77 0% $329.00 per Hour (FLAT) $779 Admin Fees10 Permit Application $30.00 Per Permit $154.39 3% $150.00 Flat $12011 Permit Issuance $45.00 Per Permit $93.55 1% $93.00 Flat $4812 FOG Application $60.00 Per Permit $110.82 46% $60.00 Flat $013 Encroachment Permit Fees (Non-Development)14 Improvement Plan Review New Per Plan $857.60 1% $850.00 Flat NA15 per additional sheet New Per Sheet $46.05 2% $45.00 Deposit NA16 Traffic Control Review (site specific) New $286.74 1% $285.00 Flat NA17 Traffic Control Review (WATCH) New $77.20 3% $75.00 Flat NA18 Variance Request New $255.88 0% $255.00 Flat NA19 Addressing Review New $308.79 3% $300.00 Flat NA20 90 Day Permit Extension New $77.20 3% $75.00 Flat NA21 Encroachment Permit Fees (Development)22 Improvement Plan Review New $235.47 0% $235.00 Deposit NA23 per additional sheet New Per Sheet $92.10 2% $90.00 Deposit NA24 Traffic Control Review (site specific) New $317.88 1% $315.00 Deposit NA25 per additional sheet New Per sheet $143.37 2% $140.00 Deposit NA26 Traffic Control Review (WATCH) New $77.20 3% $75.00 Deposit NA27 Variance Request New $255.88 0% $255.00 Flat NA28 Addressing Review New $308.79 3% $300.00 Flat NA29 90 Day Permit Extension New $77.20 3% $75.00 Flat NA30 Encroachment Permit Fees (Utility)31 Improvement Plan Review New $380.47 0% $380.00 Deposit NA32 per additional sheet New Per Sheet $92.10 2% $90.00 Deposit NA33 Traffic Control Review (site specific) New $317.88 1% $315.00 Deposit NA34 per additional sheet New Per sheet $143.37 2% $140.00 Deposit NA35 Traffic Control Review (WATCH) New $77.20 3% $75.00 Deposit NA36 Variance Request New $255.88 0% $255.00 Flat NA37 Addressing Review New $308.79 3% $300.00 Flat NA38 90 Day Permit Extension New $77.20 3% $75.00 Flat NA39 Encroachment Permit Fees (SWF)40 Application, Plan Check, and Issuance Fee (up to 5 facilities) $500.00 Per Application Set by STATE $953.47 0% $950.00 Flat $45041 6+ Facilities $100.00 Per SWF after 5 Set by STATE $184.19 2% $180.00 Flat $80 45 Public Works
Item No. Title Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Unit Fee Δ42 Application, Plan Check, and Issuance Fee (New Pole for SWF) $1,000.00 Per SWF Set by STATE $1,966.54 3% $1,900.00 Flat $90043 Recurring Fee $270.00 Per SWF Per year Set by STATE NA NA $270.00 Flat $044 Development Permit Fees45 Plan Review (Planning/Administrative Approvals) Varies Per Submittal $286.74 1% $285.00 Deposit NA46 Plan Review (Entitlement Review) Varies Per Submittal $5,734.72 0% $5,730.00 Deposit NA47 Plan Review (On-site building permit) Varies Per Submittal $10,035.76 0% $10,000.00 Deposit NA48 Plan Review (Off-site improvement plans) See below NA NA See below See below $049 0-5 Sheets New Per Tier $11,469.44 0% $11,460.00 Deposit NA50 6-10 Sheets New Per Tier $17,204.16 0% $17,200.00 Deposit NA51 11-15 Sheets New Per Tier $22,938.88 0% $22,930.00 Deposit NA52 16-20 Sheets New Per Tier $28,673.60 0% $28,670.00 Deposit NA53 20+ Sheets New Per Tier $34,408.32 0% $34,400.00 Deposit NA54 Plan Review (Technical Study) $2,400.00 Per Document $5,734.72 0% $5,730.00 Deposit $3,33055 Agreement Fee $2,400.00 Per Document $4,301.04 0% $4,300.00 Deposit $1,90056 Agreement Amendment Fee $2,400.00 Per Document $4,301.04 0% $4,300.00 Deposit $1,90057 Mapping Review Fee $4,000.00 Per Submittal $8,602.08 0% $8,600.00 Deposit $4,60058 Inspection Fees59 Inspection (Non-Dev) See non-dev encroachment permit fees above
Per Submittal Flat fee includes inspection NA NA See non-dev encroachment permit fees above $0 60 Inspection (Development & Utility)61 0-5 hours New Per Tier Deposit $1,433.68 0% $1,430.00 Per Tier NA62 6-10 hours New Per Tier Deposit $2,867.36 0% $2,860.00 Per Tier NA63 11-20 hours New Per Tier Deposit $5,734.72 0% $5,730.00 Per Tier NA64 21-30 hours New Per Tier Deposit $8,602.08 0% $8,600.00 Per Tier NA65 31+ hours New Per Tier Deposit $11,469.44 0% $11,465.00 Per Tier NA66 On-Site Inspection (NPDES) New Per Hour $197.33 1% $195.00 Per Hour (Deposit) NA67 Miscellaneous Fees68 Wide Load Permit $20.00 Per Submittal $38.85 2% $38.00 Flat $18 NOTE:Deposit based fees are subject to change based upon direction of the Community Development Director or designee per Municipal Code 3.32.035. 46 27368 Via Industria, Suite 200
Temecula, California 92590-4856
800.755.6864 | Fax: 888.326.6864
951.587.3500 | Fax: 951.587.3510
www.willdan.com
CITYof BREA
Communication
October 7, 2025
Item No. 2E.

Laurel Elementary School Circulation & Safety Assessment

TO PREPARED BY
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Ryan Chapman, City Engineer

DEPARTMENT HEAD APPROVAL CITY MANAGER APPROVAL
Michael Ho, Public Works Director Kristin Griffith, City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action:

1. Receive and file the Laurel Elementary School Circulation & Safety Assessment Attachments
Laurel Elementary School Circulation & Safety Assessment.pdf Laurel Elementary School Circulation & Safety Assessment Presentation.pdf 101 Pacifica | Suite 300 | Irvine, CA 92618 | (949) 308-6300 | Fax (949) 859-3209 | www.fehrandpeers.com
Memorandum
Date: August 25, 2025
To: City of Brea, Public Works Department
From: Fehr & Peers
Subject: Laurel Elementary School Circulation and Safety Assessment OC23-1011
Fehr and Peers completed an operational and safety assessment (Assessment) of mobility and circulation adjacent to Laurel Elementary Magnet School (School) in Brea, California. The objective of the study is to understand challenges and opportunities related to student dop-off and pick-up during peak periods of school traffic. This memorandum documents the findings from review of existing conditions, relevant standards and plans, intersection operation analysis, and in-person field observations. This assessment presents findings of the safety analysis and evaluation of potential improvement alternatives.

Executive Summary
The Assessment identifies key traffic and safety challenges including queue spillbacks, pedestrian conflicts, and unsafe turning movements, which contribute to increased collision risks. Review of collision records found speeding and turning conflicts as the primary contributing factors. Three potential improvement alternatives were evaluated, while all alternatives offer varying degrees of benefit, Alternative 3 (Cul-de-Sac) provides the highest long-term safety and operational improvements but at higher cost and greater complexity. Alternative 2 (Right-in-right-out) and Alternative 4 (One-Way Conversion) offer more immediate, lower-cost solutions with notable safety gains and less disruption. Final selection of the improvement alternative should consider funding availability, stakeholder priorities, and coordination with Caltrans. A conceptual design and public engagement process is recommended before selection of a final preferred alternative.

City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 2 of 50 ends

Introduction
Laurel Elementary Magnet School (School) is bound by Imperial Highway (State Route 90) (SR-90) to the south, South Flower Avenue to the west, East Birch Street to the north, and an alley separating the School from the residential development to the east. Access to the School’s front entrance is facilitated by two full access driveways along South Flower Avenue entering and exiting a surface parking lot with approximately 37 spaces. Along the alley, gated entrances for pedestrian access to the School are located immediately south of East Birch Street adjacent to nine parking spaces and approximately 350 feet south of East Birch Street.

Study Area
The study area was selected based on distribution of school related trips. Figure 1 shows the study area. Fehr & Peers analyzed the operations of the following eight study intersections:

1. South Brea Boulevard & East Birch Street (Signalized)

2. South Orange Avenue & East Birch Street (Side-Street Stop Control)

3. South Flower Avenue & East Birch Street (Signalized)

4. Alley & East Birch Street (Side-Street Stop Control)

5. South Brea Boulevard & Imperial Highway (Signalized)

6. South Orange Avenue and Imperial Highway (Side-Street Stop Control)

7. South Flower Avenue & Imperial Highway (Side-Street Stop Control)

8. Sycamore Avenue & Imperial Highway (Side-Street Stop Control) Existing Roadway Network
The existing condition and classification1 of the roadways surrounding Laurel Elementary School are summarized below.
 South Brea Boulevard (south of East Birch Street) – Classified as a Major Arterial within the study area, where it is a six-lane divided roadway. Outside the study area, it transitions to a Primary Arterial, constructed as a four-lane divided roadway.  Imperial Highway (SR-90) – Classified as a Smart Street Arterial with enhanced traffic capacity and designated as part of the Orange County Congestion Management Program Highway System (CMPHS), owned and operated by Caltrans. Within the study area, it is a six-lane divided roadway with a raised center median.
1 Circulation Element of the City of Brea General Plan (2003) ! !! !! ! !!
East Birch Street
Imperial Highway South Brea Boulevard
South Brea Boulevard
∙90
5 1
6 7
2 3
4 8
Study Area
Legend
!
Study Intersections Laurel Elementary School
Figure 1
Imperial Highway
South Orange Avenue
South Flower Avenue
Sycamore Avenue
Figure 1
City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 4 of 50 ends

 East Birch Street – Classified as a Secondary Arterial, typically ranging from two to four lanes. Within the study area, it is a four-lane roadway with a two-way left-turn lane (TWLTL) separating eastbound and westbound travel lanes.  South Flower Avenue and South Orange Avenue – Both are classified as Local Roadways, each constructed as a two-lane undivided roadway.

In addition to the General Plan roadways, some roadways within the City of Brea are under State or Regional jurisdiction, including SR-57 and SR-90. The Orange County Congestion Management Program (CMP) provides a list of roadways and intersections designated for monitoring. Although SR-90 is classified as a CMP roadway, none of the studied intersections are managed by OCTA as CMP intersections.

Existing Plans and Previous Studies
Brea Olinda Unified School District (BOUSD) created a series of master plans2 to outline future improvements for each of the schools in its jurisdiction. The Master Plan for Laurel Elementary (Appendix A) includes a variety of planned improvements ranging from modernization of existing classroom buildings, construction of new classrooms, the creation of new parking lots along the school’s frontage on Imperial Highway, and a new bus drop-off area along the alley east of the school. Laurel Elementary School has also published Drop Off and Pick Up Procedures3 to provide directions for parent drivers during peak periods of school traffic. These procedures include specific instructions to access the Alley from East Birch Street and exit the Alley onto Imperial Highway, reminders to not leave vehicles parked or unattended, and directions to avoid blocking the alley.

In addition to existing plans and procedures, relevant traffic studies were reviewed to better understand on-going development and past recommendations near Laurel Elementary School, including the Traffic Impact Analysis for the Gaslight Square development project (Urban Crossroad, 2023) and the Laurel Elementary School Circulation and Parking Study (Kittleson, 2023).

Prompted by the proposal of the Gaslight Square project, a traffic analysis was conducted (Urban Crossroads, 2023) as part of the environmental review procedure. The analysis identified existing deficient4 operations at the unsignalized intersection of South Flower Avenue and Imperial Highway and extensive queuing at the intersection of South Brea Boulevard and Imperial Highway. The study recommended and conceptually analyzed two alternative scenarios, one where the north leg of the intersection of Imperial Highway and South Flower Avenue would be 2 https://www.bousdplan.org/schools/laurel#SchoolMasterPlan 3 https://laurel.bousd.us/apps/pages/index.jsp?uREC_ID=1179685&type=d&pREC_ID=2352997 4 Worse than Level of Service (LOS) D per City of Brea TIA Guidelines City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 5 of 50 ends

modified to become right-in-right-out only (Alternative 2), and another with complete closure of South Flower Avenue as a cul-de-sac (Alternative 3).

The Circulation and Parking Plan (Kittelson, 2023) recommended improvements to install high visibility crosswalks and restrict northbound right turns at the intersection of South Flower Avenue and East Birch Street when a crossing guard is on active duty. These improvements were implemented to reduce conflicts between drivers and pedestrians and were observed to be effective during the recent field visit.

Data Collection
Traffic Counts
Based on the school schedule for Laurel Elementary (Table 1), intersection turning movement counts were conducted in October of 2023 during the following periods to capture all student related traffic at the study intersections.

1. 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM

2. 9:45 AM to 12:00 PM

3. 1:00 PM to 3:00 PM

4. 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Table 1 – Laurel Elementary School Schedule
Grade Level
Monday, Tuesday,
Thursday, & Friday Wednesday
Let In Let Out Let In Let Out
Grade 1-6 8:00 AM 2:10 PM 8:00 AM 1:25 PM
AM
TK/Kindergarten 8:00 AM 11:30 AM 8:00 AM 11:15 AM
PM
TK/Kindergarten 10:20 AM 2:10 PM 9:50 AM 1:25 PM
Counts were collected during fair weather, while school was in session, and during a typical (nonholiday) Thursday (October 2023). The turning movement counts are provided in Appendix B.

Existing (2023) traffic volumes are provided in Figure 2A & 2B along with existing lane configurations and intersection control (Figure 3).

Legend
xx (xx) - AM 1 Peak Hour (AM 2 Peak Hour)
Laurel Elementary School
Figure 2A
AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
Existing (2023) Conditions
23 (44)
434 (300)191 (172)
23 (49)
57 (73)
23 (32) 52 (71) 774 (376)
373 (237)
301 (222)
73 (87)
281 (202)

1. S Brea Boulevard/W Birch St/E Birch St
13 (9)
1 (3)
21 (16)
585 (438)
40 (41)12 (14)
8 (9)
643 (498)
22 (25)

2. S Orange Ave/E Birch St
90 (15)
51 (6)
26 (48)
19 (14)
570 (428)
22 (7) 19 (13) 7 (3)
33 (26)
14 (11)
566 (494)
92 (63)

3. S Flower Ave/E Birch St
5 (0)0 (1)2 (4)
2 (1)
609 (496)
17 (2) 1 (2) 0 (0)
2 (0)
3 (0)
667 (567)
35 (3)

4. Alley/E Birch St
415 (297)441 (343)169 (216)
129 (94)
1,454 (1,123)
394 (242) 148 (129) 713 (334)
216 (137)
92 (94)
1,415 (1,057)
175 (230)

5. S Brea Boulevard/Imperial Highway
17 (23)
1,850 (1,478)
6 (7)20 (19)
21 (19)
1,675 (1,38

6. S Orange Ave/Imperial Highway
12 (4)
76 (45)
1,784 (1,452)
2 (1) 82 (65) 8 (7)
96 (19)
1,615 (1,333)

7. S Flower Ave/Imperial Highway
0 (2)0 (0)
17 (8)
6 (7)
1,782 (1,443)
12 (10) 18 (5) 1 (0)
3 (3)
3 (3)
1,696 (1,345)
35 (21)

8. Alley/Sycamore Ave/Imperial Highway
W Birch St E Birch St S Brea BoulevardE Birch St
S Orange Ave
E Birch St
S Flower Ave
E Birch St
Alley
Imperial Highway
S Brea Boulevard
Imperial Highway
S Orange Ave
Imperial Highway
S Flower Ave
Imperial Highway
Alley Sycamore Ave
STOP
P TO S
STOP
STOP
STOP
P TO S
STOP
P TO S
STOP
P TO S
ae
acce
aacce
aacf
ccf
d
f
ace
ace
d
d
ace
ace
d
d
ace
aacccf
aacccf
aaccf
aacccf
cce
f
f
cce
f
acce
af
cce
acce
d
d
acce
Figure 2A
Legend
xx (xx) - PM 1 Peak Hour (PM 2 Peak Hour)
Laurel Elementary School
Figure 2B
PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
Existing (2023) Conditions
40 (55)
524 (682)194 (261)
56 (68)
77 (103)
32 (30) 49 (89) 530 (532)
302 (403)
343 (423)
101 (148)
279 (339)

1. S Brea Boulevard/W Birch St/E Birch St
8 (15)
3 (3)
38 (38)
577 (670)
28 (77)16 (34)
10 (23)
695 (888)
9 (51)

2. S Orange Ave/E Birch St
36 (38)43 (11)23 (53)
34 (20)
573 (671)
11 (12) 37 (17) 10 (2)
45 (23)
23 (16)
642 (911)
52 (61)

3. S Flower Ave/E Birch St
0 (4)0 (0)1 (9)
3 (3)
616 (759)
21 (7) 3 (0) 0 (0)
2 (0)
8 (1)
715 (979)
16 (1)

4. Alley/E Birch St
372 (443)526 (707)218 (264)
125 (165)
1,209 (1,480)
379 (404) 153 (179) 501 (571)
211 (171)
114 (162)
1,254 (1,523)
307 (208)

5. S Brea Boulevard/Imperial Highway
28 (21)
1,636 (1,902)
19 (20)27 (30)
19 (32)
1,670 (1,87

6. S Orange Ave/Imperial Highway
4 (2)
43 (62)
1,610 (1,779)
3 (13) 57 (67) 9 (3)
39 (31)
1,628 (1,906)

7. S Flower Ave/Imperial Highway
1 (3)0 (0)
13 (14)
11 (18)
1,594 (1,875)
14 (14) 28 (10) 0 (0)
4 (0)
1 (2)
1,639 (1,975)
23 (30)

Brea Laurel Elementary
Figure 3
Lane Configuration and Intersection Control

1. S Brea Boulevard/W Birch St/E Birch St 2. S Orange Ave/E Birch St 3. S Flower Ave/E Birch St *4. Alley/E Birch St

5. S Brea Boulevard/Imperial Highway 6. S Orange Ave/Imperial Highway 7. S Flower Ave/Imperial Highway 8. Alley/Sycamore Ave/Imperial Highway W Birch St E Birch St S Brea BoulevardE Birch St
S Orange Ave
E Birch St
S Flower Ave
E Birch St
Alley
Imperial Highway
S Brea Boulevard
Imperial Highway
S Orange Ave
Imperial Highway
S Flower Ave
Imperial Highway
Alley Sycamore Ave
STOP
P TO S
STOP
STOP
STOP
P TO S
STOP
P TO S
STOP
P TO S
ae
acce
aacce
aacf
ccf
d
f
ace
ace
d
d
ace
ace
f
f
ace
aacccf
aacccf
aaccf
aacccf
cce
f
f
cce
f
acce
af
cce
acce
d
d
acce
Figure 3
City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 9 of 50 ends

The data collected was within 10% when compared to those collected for previous traffic studies.

This difference is within the typical range of day-to-day fluctuations of observed traffic volume.

Although a significant portion of students walk and bike to and from Laurel Elementary School, younger students are expected to be more dependent on parent drivers. Therefore, the division of the TK/Kindergarten student group into AM and PM attendance improves the distribution of vehicle trips related to student drop-off and pick-up.

Field Observations
In addition to the collection of traffic volume data, observations were made by two staff members (Fehr & Peers) on foot throughout the day on October 26 during the morning (7:00 am to 9:00 am, and 9:45 am to noon) peak periods. Field staff made notes of existing signage and pavement delineation, then performed stationary observations of driver and pedestrian behaviors at the front of the school. Key observations made during the morning period are as follows,  As parents gradually arrived by car, many parked in the private parking lot north of Imperial Highway between South Flower Avenue and South Orange Avenue.  Parents and students then made their way across South Flower Avenue mid-block to reach Laurel Elementary.
 Due to the relatively low and consistent vehicular volume, pedestrians were able to find gaps in traffic to complete the uncontrolled crossing. However, without a designated crosswalk, pedestrians crossed S. Flower Avenue in a dispersed and unpredictable manner, navigating through traffic at various points along the roadway.  Travel speeds were generally within limits and drivers were generally not aggressive.

During the afternoon (1:00 pm to 3:00 pm), school-related traffic was observed to be more concentrated and aggressive than in the morning. Approximately 30 minutes prior to school let out, parents were queued along the Alley in the southbound direction, and along South Flower Avenue in both directions. Key observations made during the afternoon peak period are as follows,
Along the Alley and East Birch Street
 Queueing along the Alley began approximately 150 feet north of Imperial Highway, with widely spaced gaps between queued vehicles, resulting in a loosely formed line.  A mix of carpool/rideshare and parents were observed within the queue.  Unoccupied vehicles were observed despite posted signs prohibiting parking, affecting the progression of the queue.
 The queue of vehicles occupies more than half of the width of the alley, particularly south of the gated pedestrian access adjacent to the classrooms, making maneuvers within the alley difficult.
 The end of the queue eventually reached East Birch Street and began spilling back onto East Birch Street. Eastbound traffic along E. Birch Street was observed to abruptly stop or City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 10 of 50 ends

merge into adjacent lanes to avoid stopped vehicles. Several drivers queued to enter the Alley were observed to unexpectedly exit the queue to continue eastbound along E. Birch Street, causing near misses with the eastbound through traffic.

Along South Flower Avenue and Imperial Highway
 Along South Flower Avenue, all unrestricted curb space was utilized as parking.  Drivers utilized the parking lot on the west side of S. Flower Avenue, resulting in midblock crossings along South Flower Avenue when parents cross the street to access the School, and then accompany students when making their way back to the car. Some students were observed to make this crossing unaccompanied.  An attendant at the front of the school directed drivers and effectively kept spacing between queued vehicles tight. However, the northbound queue eventually spilled back onto Imperial Highway, where drivers illegally stopped along the westbound curb adjacent lane, which was not sufficiently wide for right turn queuing and simultaneous through traffic, drivers were observed to abruptly stop or merge to avoid stopped vehicles.

It should be noted that more parking enforcement at the future commercial development may lead to an increase of queuing along South Flower Avenue (or elsewhere within the study area), though they are still allowed to park freely within the Public Downtown Brea Parking Structure located on South Orange Avenue roughly 200 feet away.

City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 11 of 50 ends

Intersection Operations Analysis
Operations Analysis Methodology
Per the City of Brea Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines, the latest Transportation Research Board (TRB) Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) is required to conduct the Level of Service (LOS) analysis. The HCM methodology estimates a quantitative delay at intersections. After the quantitative delay estimates are complete, the methodology assigns a qualitative letter grade that represents the operations of the intersection. These grades range from LOS A (minimal delay) to LOS F (excessive congestion). LOS E represents at-capacity operations. Descriptions of the LOS letter grades for signalized and unsignalized intersections are provided in Table 2 per the latest HCM. The HCM methodology was used to analyze all study intersections using the Synchro 11 software package to facilitate the calculations.

Table 2: Level of Service for Signalized Intersections
Level of
Service
(LOS)
Signalized Delay
(Seconds)
Unsignalized
Delay (Seconds) Description
A 0 – 10.0 < 10.0 Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression and/or short cycle length
B > 10.0 to 20.0 > 10.0 to 15.0 Operations with low delay occurring with good progression and/or short cycle lengths
C > 20.0 to 35.0 > 15.0 to 25.0
Operations with average delays resulting from fair
progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to appear
D > 35.0 to 55.0 > 25.0 to 35.0
Operations with longer delays due to a combination of
unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high V/C ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable
E > 55.0 to 80.0 > 35.0 to 50.0
Operations with high delay values indicating poor
progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios.

Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences
F > 80.00 > 50.0
Operation with delays unacceptable to most drivers
occurring due to over saturation, poor progression, or very long cycle lengths
Source: Highway Capacity Manual 7th Edition (Transportation Research Board, 2022).

It should be noted that the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) CMP designates all state highways and principal arterials within its jurisdiction as part of the CMPHS, which includes Imperial Highway near the study area. Peak period operating conditions are required to be evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology for designated CMP City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 12 of 50 ends

intersections. None of the study intersections are identified as designated CMP intersections and the latest HCM methodology was utilized for the intersection operations analysis.

Level of Service (LOS) Standards
Per the City’s TIA Guidelines, LOS D is the minimum acceptable standard for City-maintained intersections, aligning with Orange County CMP requirements for designated CMP intersections.

Within Brea, the designated CMP intersections include State College Boulevard at Imperial Highway, Valencia Avenue at Imperial Highway, and the SR-57 northbound and southbound ramps at Imperial Highway5.

Existing (2023) Intersection Operations
Existing lane configurations and traffic volumes were used to evaluate operations at the study intersections under peak hour conditions. Signal timing was obtained for signalized intersections from the appropriate jurisdictions. The LOS results are summarized in Table 3 and detailed LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix C. As shown in Table 3, the only signalized intersection operating at less than acceptable level of service is South Brea Boulevard & Imperial Highway during the AM peak period. Although the unsignalized intersections of South Flower Avenue at Imperial Highway and Sycamore Avenue at Imperial Highway both operate at acceptable levels of service, delays at the worst approach (southbound) were found to be deficient (over 35 seconds of delay) during most studied peak periods at each location.

Table 3: Existing (2023) Intersection Level of Service
Intersection Control Peak Period
Existing (2023)
LOS / Average
Delay
LOS / Worst
Movement
1 S. Brea Blvd &
E. Birch St Signalized
7 – 9 AM D / 36.4 -
10 AM - D / 36.7 -
1 – 3 PM D / 44.9 -
4 – 6 PM D / 37.2 -
2 S. Orange Ave &
E. Birch St TWSC
7 – 9 AM 0.8 C / 19.4 (NB)
10 AM - 0.8 C / 15.6 (NB)
1 – 3 PM 0.8 C / 16.9 (NB)
4 – 6 PM 1.5 D / 31.1 (NB)
3 S. Flower Ave &
E. Birch St Signalized
7 – 9 AM B / 10.4 -
10 AM - A / 4.3 -
1 – 3 PM B / 11.9 -
4 – 6 PM A / 4.2 -
5 Figure 4: 2023 CMP Level of Service Chart, OCTA CMP page 16 City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 13 of 50 ends

Intersection Control Peak Period
Existing (2023)
LOS / Average
Delay
LOS / Worst
Movement
4 Alley & E. Birch St TWSC
7 – 9 AM 0.5 D / 31.7 (NB)
10 AM - 0.1 B / 13.6 (NB)
1 – 3 PM 0.2 C / 18.2 (SB)
4 – 6 PM 0.2 C / 20.6 (NB)
5 S. Brea Blvd &
Imperial Hwy Signalized
7 – 9 AM E / 55.4 -
10 AM - D / 39. 9 -
1 – 3 PM D / 43.7 -
4 – 6 PM D / 50.7 -
6 S. Orange Ave &
Imperial Hwy TWSC
7 – 9 AM 0.4 D / 29.6 (NB)
10 AM - 0.3 C / 17.9 (NB)
1 – 3 PM 0.4 C / 21.6 (SB)
4 – 6 PM 0.4 D / 26.6 (SB)
7 S. Flower Ave &
Imperial Hwy TWSC
7 – 9 AM 37.5 F / >200 (SB)
10 AM - 1.2 D / 30.3 (SB)
1 – 3 PM 1.7 F / 60.6 (SB)
4 – 6 PM 3.2 F / 98.0 (SB)
8 Sycamore Ave &
Imperial Hwy TWSC
7 – 9 AM 2.4 F / >200 (SB)
10 AM - 0.5 E / 44.5 (SB)
1 – 3 PM 0.9 E / 46.4 (SB)
4 – 6 PM 1.1 F / 120.1 (NB)
Notes:

1. Whole intersection weighted average stopped delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections. Worst lane delay reported for two-way-stop-controlled (TWSC) intersections.

2. Two-Way Stop-Controlled (TWSC) intersections do not have an overall LOS grade because their operational performance is evaluated based on the delays experienced by individual minor approaches or movements that must yield to major road traffic. Elevated minor street delay may indicate difficulty identifying gaps for turning movements.

3. Delays at TWSC intersections can be amplified by methodology, but with few side-street vehicles counted, delays over 200 seconds likely exaggerates stop conditions under high major road volumes.

4. Delay operations were calculated using HCM 7th methodologies.

5. Bold symbolizes LOS E or worse
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.

City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 14 of 50 ends

Summary of LOS Findings
Existing signalized operations at most study intersections were found to perform at acceptable LOS during peak periods. Some individual approaches at the unsignalized intersections of South Flower Avenue at Imperial Highway and Sycamore Avenue at Imperial Highway experience delays for the southbound left turn movement. Due to the staggered schedule for the School’s youngest students, the concentration of drop-off and pick-up related traffic during the peak periods was less pronounced. However, field observations of queue spillback onto Imperial Highway (westbound) and East Birch Street (eastbound) during the PM peak period demonstrate the opportunity for circulation and safety improvements. Additional analysis, documented within the Improvement Alternatives Chapter, was conducted to evaluate the viability of circulation changes to South Flower Avenue at the intersection of Imperial Highway (as conceptualized in past studies), and the effects of these alternatives on the surrounding roadway network.

City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 15 of 50 ends

Safety Assessment
This safety assessment systematically analyzes collision records near Laurel Elementary School to identify trends and safety concerns that may be mitigated through intersection or roadway improvements. This evaluation combines data of past crashes with field observations to develop recommendations that align with the Safe System Roadway Design Hierarchy.6 Data Collection
Collision data was collected for East Birch Street (between Brea Boulevard and Poplar Avenue) and E. Imperial Highway (between Brea Boulevard and Poplar Avenue) over a five-year study period (January 2019 – December 20237). To ensure comprehensive data coverage, records were obtained from the City of Brea Police Department and cross-referenced with the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), resulting in a database of 94 reported collisions near the study area, 47 of which (50%) were related to the study intersections, while the remaining 47 (50%) occurred midblock or at intersections outside the study area. A summary of collisions related to the eight study intersections, and the associated severity is provided in Table 4.

Table 4: Summary of Collision at Study Intersections
Intersection Intersection Related8 Collisions
(5 years)
Injury Collisions
(5 years)
Fatal Collisions
(5 years)
S. Brea Blvd & E. Birch St 10 4 0
S. Orange Ave & E. Birch St 0 0 0
S. Flower Ave & E. Birch St 6 1 0
Alley & E. Birch St 0 0 0
S. Brea Blvd & Imperial Hwy 22 6 0
S. Orange Ave & Imperial Hwy 4 2 0
S. Flower Ave & Imperial Hwy 3 2 0
Sycamore Ave & Imperial Hwy 2 0 0
Total Intersection Collisions 47 15 0
Additionally, in-person field observations conducted on a typical school day, as documented earlier in this report, provided insights beyond collision data alone, capturing near-miss incidents and traffic stress experienced by pedestrians and bicyclists. A heatmap of all analyzed collisions is presented in Figure 4.
6 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 2024
7 2024 SWITRS data was provisional at the time of this assessment 8 Less than 50 feet from intersection
\\fpgisdevapp01\DevGISLibrary\ServiceMXDs\OC\OC23-1011 Brea Laurel Elementary School Circulation Study\CollisionAnalysis\CollisionAnalysis.aprx Collision Density (2019 - 2023)
Brea Laurel Elementary
Dense
Sparse
Figure 4 Figure 4
Figure 1
City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 17 of 50 ends

Methodology
Guided by the Safe System approach, this assessment identifies key safety concerns by analyzing collision data, evaluating the associated risk factors, and identifying measures to address underlying conditions. The Safe System approach acknowledges that human mistakes are inevitable and focuses on designing roadways, speeds, vehicles, and behaviors to minimize crash severity and prevent serious injuries or fatalities.

The assessment begins with comprehensive collision data catalogue, capturing details such as crash type, severity, contributing factors, and roadway characteristics. Then the data was analyzed to identify patterns of treatable crashes. Given the school’s location and the presence of frequent vulnerable users, special attention was given to school activity periods, trends involving pedestrians and bicyclists, and high-severity crash factors.

Collisions by Time
Over the past five years, there was an observable decrease in total collisions in the years 2020 and 2021, which was likely attributed by decrease in travel due to stay-at-home mandates during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. Nationally, a decrease in overall travel was observed9 for the same period, but collisions were associated with more severe outcomes10, corresponding to an increase in the rate of speed-related fatalities. As demonstrated in Figure 5, collisions at study intersections demonstrate similar trends of collisions more frequently related to unsafe speed in 2021, however there were no collisions resulting in fatalities or serious injuries within the study period.

Figure 5: Collision by Year
9 Monthly VMT data (FHWA), USDOT
10 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Overview of Motor Vehicle Traffic Crashes in 2021 26 15
14 22
17 31%
13%
57%
27%
24%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
% Related to Unsafe Speed
Total Collisions
Year
Collisions % Speed related
City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 18 of 50 ends

When grouped by months (Figure 6), collision data reveals a higher frequency of crashes between August and March, compared to the spring and summer months, which experienced fewer incidents on average. Notably, despite the absence of school days in June, a high number of collisions were recorded within the study area.

Figure 6: Collision by Month

1 3
11 5
3 4
2 4
1 7
9 7
4 3
6 5
5 5
5 8
5 0
2 4
6 8
10 12
14 Jan
(16)
Feb
(19)
Mar
(20)
Apr
(17)
May
(22)
Jun
(0)
Jul
(0)
Aug
(14)
Sep
(20)
Oct
(22)
Nov
(15)
Dec
(15)
Total Collisions
Months
(#of School Days)
Birch St Imperial Hwy
City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 19 of 50 ends

As shown in Figure 7, 27% of all collisions along Imperial Highway occurred on Wednesdays, followed by 19% on Saturdays. Mondays, Tuesdays, and Thursdays experienced similar but belowaverage collision frequencies, while Fridays and Sundays recorded the fewest incidents. Along East Birch Street, collisions were most frequent on Saturdays, Thursdays, and Fridays.

During the school months (August through May), the rate of weekday collisions along Imperial Highway increased, suggesting a potential correlation with school-related traffic activity.

Figure 7: Collision by Days of the Week

3 22
4 2
6 1
6 8
15 10
8 11
4 0
2 4
6 8
10 12
14 16
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Total Collisions
Days of the Week (August - May)
Collisions by Days of the Week
Birch St Imperial Hwy
City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 20 of 50 ends

Figure 8 represents a breakdown of collisions by time of day. On average, more collisions occurred during the hours between 11:00 am and 5:00 pm, with a similar peak at 7:00 am. This pattern generally aligns with typical morning peak hours of travel from 7:00 am to 9:00 am and afternoon peak hours of travel from 4:00 pm to 6:00 pm. However, the hours between 1:00 pm and 3:00 pm were associated with the highest rate of collisions, which typically aligned with school-related traffic during afternoon student let-out.

Figure 8: Collision by Time of Day
Collisions by Type and Location
Collisions involving pedestrians or cyclists are statistically more likely to result in serious injuries.

Of the collisions analyzed by type (Figure 9), only 5% involved either a pedestrian or a bicyclist, but these collisions contributed to 12% of all injuries, at nearly 2.5 times the likelihood of injury when compared to collisions between motor vehicles. Although a small percentage of all collisions involved pedestrians or cyclists, there may also be near misses which do not result in a collision, or high levels of traffic stress experienced during travel by these modes; both nuances should be considered in the evaluation of safety. These considerations were captured during inperson observations and discussed in the summary of findings. 1 111
2 3
2 3
1 2
3 1
2 1
3 0
22 3
6 2
31 4
5 64
64 3
3 5
1 1
13 0
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 Midnight
1:002:003:004:005:006:007:008:009:00
10:0011:00
Noon
1:002:003:004:005:006:007:008:009:00
10:0011:00
Number of Collisions
Time of Day
Birch St Imperial Hwy
City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 21 of 50 ends

Of all collisions, 39% were rear-end collisions, which are commonly associated with situations where drivers are unable to react to slowing or stopped vehicles. This type of collision is often associated with unexpected or sudden changes to roadway conditions where a driver has little time to react.
21% of all collisions were represented by broadside collisions, which can occur when drivers fail to negotiate the proper right-of-way when entering an intersection, execute improper turning movements, or fail to react when another driver unexpectedly enters the driver’s path of travel.

Opportunity and severity for these types of collisions is further exacerbated when drivers travel at high speeds.

Figure 9: Collision by Type
Throughout the study period, 75% of all collisions occurred along Imperial Highway, where 80% of all pedestrian and bicyclist involved collisions occur, and where 65% of all collisions were rearend or broadside collisions.

Collisions by Primary Collision Factor
Primary Collision Factor (PCF) refers to the largest contributing factors to a collision, which includes specific action, environment, vehicle, or roadway condition, or driver behavior that most directly resulted in the crash. Identifying the PCF is essential for understanding the root cause of crashes and for developing strategies to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Overall, speed related collisions represent roughly 30% of all reported collisions. 16% of all collisions were related to violation of auto right-of-way, while driving under the influence, unsafe lane change, and claims of inadequate, inconsistent, or confusing signage contributes to roughly 39%
21%
18%
9%
5%
5%
1%
1%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
Rear-End
Broadside
Sideswipe
Hit Object
Vehicle - Pedestrian
Head-On
Other
Overturned
Percentage of Total Collision
Type of Collision
Collision Type
City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 22 of 50 ends

33% in total (Figure 10). Nearly 96% of all collisions related to unsafe speeds occurred along Imperial Highway, where approximately 40% of all collisions involved unsafe speed as a PCF.

Figure 10: Collision by Primary Collision Factor
It should be considered that although only 30% of all collisions were associated with unsafe speeds as the primary factor, many of the other collision factors could be mitigated by reducing vehicle speeds, as drivers would have more time to react during potentially dangerous situations.

Summary of Findings
Analysis of the collision data confirms a general relationship between school related traffic and higher rates of collisions. More collisions occurred during the school months, similar to patterns exhibited throughout the weekdays, and reflected in hourly patterns over the course of a typical day. Collisions were found to occur more frequently along Imperial Highway when compared to East Birch Street, proportional to the traffic volumes on each roadway. The majority of crashes were attributed to drivers traveling at unsafe speeds as the primary collision factor, which also limits the ability of drivers to react to sudden and unexpected changes to roadway conditions and contribute as a secondary factor to many other collisions.

Additionally, queue spillbacks from South Flower Avenue (northbound) onto Imperial Highway (westbound) and from the school alley (southbound) onto East Birch Street (eastbound) were observed during afternoon school let out. As drivers stop within the intersections, along curb returns, and often blocking travel lanes, oncoming traffic was forced to abruptly stop or change lanes to avoid collisions, increasing risks of rear-end and sideswipe collisions. 28 15
10 10
10 9
7 2
1 1
1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Unsafe Speed
Auto R/W Violation
Driving Under Influence
Unsafe Lane Change
Traffic Signals and Signs
Unknown
Improper Turning
Ped R/W Violation
Not Stated
Other Hazardous Movement
Other Improper Driving
Number of Collisions
Primary Collision Factor
City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 23 of 50 ends

Improvement Alternatives
Based on the operation and safety review of intersections and roadways surrounding Laurel Elementary Magnet School, the following alternatives have been evaluated as potential improvements. These recommendations are intended to improve safety by reducing conflicts and managing vehicle speeds without creating excessive vehicle delays. Conceptual design for each of the construction alternatives are provided in Appendix D. Descriptions and key features of each evaluated improvement alternative are summarized below.

Alternative 1: No Change to Existing Circulation
 Intersection geometry and vehicle movements at intersections would remain as existing  Consider countermeasures with a focus on speed management, education for drivers and other road users to increase attentiveness and awareness Alternative 2: Right-In-Right-Out at South Flower Avenue & Imperial Highway  Restrict southbound movements on South Flower Avenue at Imperial Highway to rightturn only, reducing conflict points at the intersection  Prohibit eastbound left turns from Imperial Highway onto South Flower Avenue, minimizing intersection delays and potential crash risk  Maintain existing operations at all other study intersections while rerouting restricted movements to adjacent intersections
 Enhance driver attentiveness and awareness through clear signage, pavement markings, and educational outreach, ensuring smooth adaptation to the modified circulation pattern
Alternative 3: Cul-de-Sac South Flower Avenue & Imperial Highway  Convert the southbound approach at South Flower Avenue & Imperial Highway into a cul-de-sac, eliminating direct vehicle access to Imperial Highway and reducing intersection conflict points
 Two variants of Alternative 3 were evaluated, 3A and 3B. o 3A – Conceptually designed to meet the minimum cul-de-sac radius for fire access at dead-end access roadways (40 ft).
o 3B – Conceptually designed with reduced cul-de-sac radius (35 ft) and mountable curb to maintain fire access from Imperial Highway, to consider how reduced radius would affect additional right of way required.
 Redesign the pick-up/drop-off queue along both sides of Flower Avenue and around the cul-de-sac. Alternative 3 would eliminate queue spillback onto Imperial Highway that is currently observed.

City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 24 of 50 ends

 Maintain existing operations at all other study intersections while rerouting restricted movements to adjacent intersections, maintaining local access  Enhance driver attentiveness and awareness through clear signage, wayfinding, and public outreach, guiding motorists to adjusted circulation patterns  Improve pedestrian and bicyclist safety by reducing vehicle volumes and potential conflict points at the intersection, creating a more predictable and controlled traffic environment  Eliminates cut-through traffic on South Flower Avenue, promoting a safer and quieter residential corridor
Alternative 4: South Flower Avenue Southbound One-Way Conversion  Convert South Flower Avenue to southbound one-way between East Birch Street and Imperial Highway, with updated signage and striping
 Restrict southbound movements on South Flower Avenue at Imperial Highway to rightturn only, reducing conflict points at the intersection and midblock  Remove the inbound movement from Imperial highway to eliminate queue spillback onto Imperial Highway during school drop-off and pick-up
 Implementation of traffic calming measures (e.g., speed tables or raised crosswalks) to support slower speeds and enhance safety for pedestrians, especially students  Improve traffic predictability and safety near the school  Reroute northbound local traffic, requiring public outreach and driver education  Maintains neighborhood access southbound to Imperial Highway with limited disruption  Low cost with minimal impact on drainage, emergency access, or Caltrans facilities Evaluation of Alternatives
This section discusses the operational and safety analysis conducted for each improvement alternative. Each alternative was analyzed based on traffic volume adjustments, intersection delay (LOS), and potential conflict reduction, with particular attention to queue spillbacks, turning movement restrictions, and rerouted traffic patterns. Additionally, the assessment considers safety benefits associated with each modification, ensuring that proposed changes align with the Safe System approach and effectively balance mobility and safety improvements.

Safety Considerations
Physical changes to the roadway system are more effective than changes that rely on road users alone to make safe decisions. The design of safe roads should prioritize eliminating severe conflicts, then consider strategies to reduce vehicle speed and manage conflicts that are unavoidable. By restricting southbound and eastbound left turns at the intersection of South Flower Avenue and Imperial Highway, implementation of Alternative 2 would eliminate left turn conflicts at the intersection and reduce the likelihood of rear-end, broadside, and pedestrian City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 25 of 50 ends

related collisions11. Implementation of Alternative 3 would further reduce conflicts between turning vehicles at the intersection in addition to preventing queue spillback onto Imperial Highway, therefore reducing the potential for rear-end and sideswipe collisions due to abrupt stopping and lane changes. Alternative 4, one way conversion of S. Flower Avenue, was contemplated to balance safety benefits and feasibility for implementation, which would achieve the desired safety objectives at a low cost, without impacting existing right of way, while maintaining southbound access to Imperial Highway (also northbound emergency access could be maintained if designed with mountable curbs).

Traffic Volume Adjustments
Based upon intersection turning movement data collected for the existing conditions analysis (October 2023), intersection volumes were developed for analysis of each considered improvement alternative according to anticipated rerouting of traffic from circulation changes.

For each analysis, the volume and direction of travel were conserved. It was estimated that eastbound left turn volumes at South Flower Avenue and Imperial Highway originate from three routes: 40% from the northbound right turn at South Brea Boulevard and Imperial Highway, 40% from the eastbound through movement at South Brea Boulevard and Imperial Highway and the remaining 20% from elsewhere (i.e. South Orange Street or driveways entering Imperial Highway).

These estimates provide a conservative approach considering traffic volume counts collected.

Alternative 2 Rerouting
Eastbound Left Turns – South Flower Avenue & Imperial Highway • 40% of eastbound left turning vehicles at South Flower Avenue & Imperial Highway were estimated to originate from northbound right turns at South Brea Boulevard and Imperial Highway. These vehicles were expected to instead continue northbound through South Brea Boulevard and Imperial Highway and turn right at South Brea Boulevard and East Birch Street, then proceed straight through South Orange Avenue and East Birch Street and make a right turn at South Flower Avenue and East Birch Street to reach the original destination. (Figure 11)
• 40% of eastbound left turning vehicles at South Flower Avenue & Imperial Highway were estimated to originate from the eastbound through movement at South Brea Boulevard and Imperial Highway, which would reroute to make an eastbound left turn at South Brea Boulevard and Imperial Highway, then turn right at South Flower Avenue and East Birch Street to reach the original destination.
• 20% of eastbound left turning vehicles at South Flower Avenue & Imperial Highway were estimated from elsewhere (i.e. South Orange St or driveways entering Imperial Hwy), which would continue eastbound on Imperial Highway through the intersection and make 11 SI 13 and 15 – Local Roadway Safety Manual (LRSM) – Caltrans, FHWA, SafeTrec, 2024 City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 26 of 50 ends

a U-turn at Sycamore Avenue and Imperial Highway, then make a westbound right at South Flower Avenue & Imperial Highway.

Southbound Left Turns – South Flower Avenue & Imperial Highway • 100% of traffic would reroute to make a northbound right turn at South Flower Avenue and East Birch Street and continue eastbound through Alley and East Birch Street.

Alternative 3 Rerouting
In addition to rerouting per Alternative 2, turning movements (southbound and westbound right turns) at South Flower Avenue & Imperial Highway would also be restricted. (Figure 12) Southbound Right Turn – South Flower Avenue & Imperial Highway  Traffic would reroute to turn left at South Flower Avenue and East Birch Street, proceed straight through South Orange Avenue and East Birch Street, turn left at South Brea Boulevard and East Birch Street, and either proceed straight or turn right at South Brea Boulevard and Imperial Highway to reach the original destination.

Westbound Right Turn – South Flower Avenue & Imperial Highway  Westbound right turn volumes at South Flower Avenue & Imperial Highway would instead proceed straight, then making a right turn at South Orange Avenue and Imperial Highway, right turn again at South Orange Avenue and East Birch Street, then right turn at South Flower Avenue and East Birch Street to reach the original destination.

Alternative 4 Rerouting
Under this alternative, South Flower Avenue would operate one-way in the southbound direction between East Birch Street and Imperial Highway. All northbound vehicle movements in this segment would be prohibited. (Figure 13)
Inbound vehicle movements, including eastbound left turn and westbound right turns at South Flower Avenue & Imperial Highway, would be rerouted as described by Alternative 3.

Alternative 2 (Right-In Right-Out) Rerouting
!
40% of EBL at Intersection 7 from NB S Brea Boulevard
40% of EBL at Intersection 7 from EB Imperial Highway
20% of EBL at Intersection 7 from NB S Orange Ave
50% of SBL at Intersection 7
outbound from Project
! Study Intersections
Inbound Rerouting
Outbound Rerouting
#
S Brea Boulevard
S Orange Avenue
S Flower Avenue
Imperial Highway
Sycamore
Avenue
E Birch Street
E Birch Street
Imperial Highway
!
!
!
!
!
! !
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
50% of SBL at Intersection 7 outbound from Project
Laurel Elementary
School
40% of EBL at Intersection 7
outbound from Project Site
40% of EBL at Intersection 7
outbound from Project Site
Figure 11
Alternative 3 (Cul-de-sac)
Rerouting
!
40% of EBL at Intersection 7 from NB S Brea Boulevard 40% of EBL at Intersection 7 from EB Imperial Highway 20% of EBL at Intersection 7 from NB S Orange Ave
! Study Intersections
Inbound Rerouting
Outbound Rerouting
#
S Brea Boulevard
S Orange Avenue
S Flower Avenue
Imperial Highway
Sycamore Avenue
E Birch Street
E Birch Street
Imperial Highway
50% of SBR at Intersection 7 outbound from Project 50% of SBR at Intersection 7 outbound from Project 100% of SBL at Intersection 7
outbound from Project
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
50% of WBR at Intersection 7
Laurel Elementary
School
50% of WBR at Intersection 7
Figure 12
Alternative 4 (Southbound One-Way Conversion) Rerouting !
40% of EBL at Intersection 7 from NB S Brea Boulevard
40% of EBL at Intersection 7 from EB Imperial Highway
20% of EBL at Intersection 7 from NB S Orange Ave
! Study Intersections
Inbound Rerouting
Outbound Rerouting
#
S Brea Boulevard
S Orange Avenue
S Flower Avenue
Imperial Highway
Sycamore
Avenue
E Birch Street
E Birch Street
Imperial Highway
!
!
!
!
!
! !
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
50% of WBR at Intersection 7
Laurel Elementary
School
100% of NBR at Intersection 3
and 100% of SBL at Intersection 7
outbound from Project
100% of NBT at
Intersection 3 outbound
from Project
100% of NBL at
Intersection 3 outbound
from Project
50% of WBR at Intersection 7
Figure 13
City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 30 of 50 ends

Intersection Operations
Based on existing traffic volumes and change in circulation proposed by each alternative, vehicle delays were evaluated to determine the LOS for each study intersection with implementation of each improvement alternative. Alternative 1 proposes no change to circulation and therefore study intersections would operate at existing LOS as shown in Table 3.

Alternative 2 LOS
Intersection LOS results for the implementation of Alternative 2 are summarized in Table 5, and detailed LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix E. As shown in Table 5, operations at intersections 1 and 5 would marginally improve, while all other signalized intersections would operate similar to existing LOS.

The unsignalized intersection at South Flower Avenue and Imperial Highway would have improved operations with reduced side street delay, while the intersection of Sycamore Avenue and Imperial Highway would experience marginally increased delays for the southbound approach during peak periods.

Table 5: Alternative 2 Intersection Level of Service
Intersection Control Peak Hour
Existing (2023) Alternative 2
LOS /
Average
Delay
Worst Delay
LOS /
Average
Delay
Worst Delay
1 S. Brea Blvd
& E. Birch St Signal
7-9 AM D / 36.4 - C / 33.7 -
10 AM - Noon D / 36.7 - D / 35.4 -
1-3 PM D / 44.9 - D / 44.9 -
4-6 PM D / 37.2 - D / 36.1 -
2 S. Orange
Ave & E.

Birch St
TWSC
7-9 AM 0.8 C / 19.4 (NB) 0.9 C / 20.6 (NB)
10 AM - Noon 0.8 C / 15.6 (NB) 0.8 C / 16.1 (NB)
1-3 PM 0.8 C / 16.9 (NB) 0.8 C / 17.8 (NB)
4-6 PM 1.5 D / 31.1 (NB) 1.6 D / 34.4 (NB)
3 S. Flower
Ave & E.

Birch St
Signal
7-9 AM B / 10.4 - A / 9.8 -
10 AM - Noon A / 4.3 - A / 4.3 -
1-3 PM B / 11.9 - B / 12.1 -
4-6 PM A / 4.2 - A / 4.2 -
4 Alley & E.

Birch St TWSC
7-9 AM 0.5 D / 31.7 (NB) 0.5 D / 32.1 (NB)
10 AM - Noon 0.1 B / 13.6 (NB) 0.1 B / 13.6 (NB)
1-3 PM 0.2 C / 18.2 (SB) 0.2 C / 18.2 (SB)
4-6 PM 0.2 C / 20.6 (NB) 0.2 C / 20.6 (NB)
5 S. Brea Blvd
& Imperial
Hwy
Signal
7-9 AM E / 55.4 - D / 54.6 -
10 AM - Noon D / 39. 9 - D / 40.0 -
1-3 PM D / 43.7 - D / 43.8 -
4-6 PM D / 50.7 - D / 49.9 -
City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 31 of 50 ends

Intersection Control Peak Hour
Existing (2023) Alternative 2
LOS /
Average
Delay
Worst Delay
LOS /
Average
Delay
Worst Delay
6 S. Orange
Ave &
Imperial
Hwy
TWSC
7-9 AM 0.4 D / 29.6 (NB) 0.5 D / 32.5 (SB)
10 AM - Noon 0.3 C / 17.9 (NB) 0.3 C / 17.8 (SB)
1-3 PM 0.4 C / 21.6 (SB) 0.4 C / 22.3 (SB)
4-6 PM 0.4 D / 26.6 (SB) 0.4 D / 28.0 (SB)
7 S. Flower
Ave &
Imperial
Hwy
TWSC
7-9 AM 37.5 F / >200 (SB) 5.6 F / 122.9
(SB)
10 AM - Noon 1.2 D / 30.3 (SB) 0.9 C / 23.4 (SB)
1-3 PM 1.7 F / 60.6 (SB) 1 D / 30.6 (SB)
4-6 PM 3.2 F / 98.0 (SB) 1.8 F / 54.1 (SB)
8 Sycamore
Ave &
Imperial
Hwy
TWSC
7-9 AM 2.4 F / >200 (SB) 3.2 F / >200
(SB)
10 AM - Noon 0.5 E / 44.5 (SB) 0.6 E / 47.2 (SB)
1-3 PM 0.9 E / 46.4 (SB) 1 E / 49.3 (SB)
4-6 PM 1.1 F / 120.1
(NB) 1.4 F / 152.6 (NB)
Notes:

1. Whole intersection weighted average stopped delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections. Worst lane delay reported for two-way-stop-controlled (TWSC) intersections.

2. Delay operations were calculated using HCM 7th methodologies.

3. Two-Way Stop-Controlled (TWSC) intersections do not have an overall HCM Level of Service (LOS) grades because their operational performance is evaluated based on the delays experienced by individual minor approaches or movements that must yield to major road traffic.

4. Delays at TWSC intersections can be amplified by methodology, but with few side-street vehicles counted, delays over 200 seconds are likely exaggerative of stop conditions under high major road volumes.

5. Bold symbolizes LOS E or worse
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.

Alternative 3 LOS
The LOS results with the implementation of Alternative 3 are summarized in Table 6 and detailed LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix F. As shown in Table 6, all intersections would operate at existing or better LOS with the implementation of Alternative 3 with exception to the signalized intersection at South Brea Boulevard and Imperial Highway, and the unsignalized intersection of Sycamore Avenue and Imperial Highway, where side street vehicle delays marginally worsen during peak periods. With the implementation of Alternative 3, operation of the intersection at South Brea Boulevard and Imperial Highway would improve marginally in the AM peak period but worse during the PM peak period.

Per the City of Brea TIA Guidelines (2020), “An effect on traffic operations occurs if the project causes one or more study intersections to operate at LOS D or better to degrade to LOS E or F; for intersections already operating at LOS E a change in control delay of 4 seconds and for intersections operating at LOS F a change in control delay of 2 seconds shall be considered unacceptable and cause an effect on traffic operations.” Since the signalized intersection of South City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 32 of 50 ends

Brea Blvd and Imperial Highway currently operates at LOS D during the PM peak period, improvements (such as signal timing updates) may be required to offset the effects on traffic operations during the afternoon peak (4-6 PM). It should be noted the number of peak periods intersection 5 operates at LOS E would not increase.

Table 6: Alternative 3 Intersection Level of Service
Intersection Control Peak Hour
Existing (2023) Alternative 3
LOS /
Average
Delay
Worst Delay
LOS /
Average
Delay
Worst Delay
1 S. Brea Blvd
& E. Birch St Signal
7-9 AM D / 36.4 - D / 38.7 -
10 AM - Noon D / 36.7 - D / 35.6 -
1-3 PM D / 44.9 - D / 35.1 -
4-6 PM D / 37.2 - D / 41.9 -
2 S. Orange
Ave & E.

Birch St
TWSC
7-9 AM 0.8 C / 19.4 (NB) 1.4 C / 17.5 (NB)
10 AM - Noon 0.8 C / 15.6 (NB) 0.9 B / 13.9 (NB)
1-3 PM 0.8 C / 16.9 (NB) 1 C / 15 (NB)
4-6 PM 1.5 D / 31.1 (NB) 1.8 D / 27.7 (NB)
3 S. Flower
Ave & E.

Birch St
Signal
7-9 AM B / 10.4 - A / 9.0 -
10 AM - Noon A / 4.3 - A / 5.7 -
1-3 PM B / 11.9 - A / 6.6 -
4-6 PM A / 4.2 - A / 6.9 -
4 Alley & E.

Birch St TWSC
7-9 AM 0.5 D / 31.7 (NB) 0.5 D / 34 (NB)
10 AM - Noon 0.1 B / 13.6 (NB) 0.1 B / 14.2 (NB)
1-3 PM 0.2 C / 18.2 (SB) 0.2 C / 23 (SB)
4-6 PM 0.2 C / 20.6 (NB) 0.2 D / 27.1 (NB)
5 S. Brea Blvd
& Imperial
Hwy
Signal
7-9 AM E / 55.4 - D / 54.1 -
10 AM - Noon D / 39. 9 - D / 41.7 -
1-3 PM D / 43.7 - D / 46.2 -
4-6 PM D / 50.7 - E / 55.6 -
6 S. Orange
Ave &
Imperial
Hwy
TWSC
7-9 AM 0.4 D / 29.6 (NB) 0.1 D / 27.9 (NB)
10 AM - Noon 0.3 C / 17.9 (NB) 0.2 C / 21.4 (NB)
1-3 PM 0.4 C / 21.6 (SB) 0.2 C / 25.5 (NB)
4-6 PM 0.4 D / 26.6 (SB) 0.2 D / 30.8 (NB)
7 S. Flower
Ave &
Imperial
Hwy
TWSC
7-9 AM 37.5 F / >200 (SB) 0.1 D / 26.0 (NB)
10 AM - Noon 1.2 D / 30.3 (SB) 0 C / 19.5 (NB)
1-3 PM 1.7 F / 60.6 (SB) 0 C / 21.9 (NB)
4-6 PM 3.2 F / 98.0 (SB) 0 C / 24.8 (NB)
8 Sycamore
Ave &
Imperial
Hwy
TWSC
7-9 AM 2.4 F / >200 (SB) 2.8 F / >200 (SB)
10 AM - Noon 0.5 E / 44.5 (SB) 0.6 F / 51.5 (SB)
1-3 PM 0.9 E / 46.4 (SB) 1.1 F / 58.2 (SB)
4-6 PM 1.1 F / 120.1 (NB) 1.8 F / >200 (NB)
Notes:

1. Whole intersection weighted average stopped delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections. Worst lane delay reported for two-way-stop-controlled (TWSC) intersections.

2. Delay operations were calculated using HCM 7th methodologies.

City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 33 of 50 ends

5. Bold symbolizes LOS E or worse
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.

Alternative 4 LOS
The LOS results with the implementation of Alternative 4 are summarized in Table 6 and detailed LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix G. Implementation of Alternative 4 would have similar effects on traffic operations as Alternative 3 – the signalized intersection of South Brea Blvd and Imperial Highway would experience increase in vehicle delay during the AM (fewer than 2 seconds, which is considered to be within acceptable margins per the City of Brea Guidelines) and PM peak hours (improvements such as signal timing updates may be required), with reduced delays at all other signalized intersections.

Table 6: Alternative 4 Intersection Level of Service
Intersection Control Peak Hour
Existing (2023) Alternative 4
LOS /
Average
Delay
Worst Delay
LOS /
Average
Delay
Worst Delay
1 S. Brea Blvd
& E. Birch St Signal
7-9 AM D / 36.4 - C / 33.5 -
10 AM - Noon D / 36.7 - C / 33.4 -
1-3 PM D / 44.9 - C / 32.5 -
4-6 PM D / 37.2 - D / 35.3 -
2 S. Orange
Ave & E.

Birch St
TWSC
7-9 AM 0.8 C / 19.4 (NB) 4.5 E / 38.4 (NB)
10 AM - Noon 0.8 C / 15.6 (NB) 1.1 B / 15 (NB)
1-3 PM 0.8 C / 16.9 (NB) 2.9 D / 32.3 (NB)
4-6 PM 1.5 D / 31.1 (NB) 2.6 E / 39.3 (NB)
3 S. Flower
Ave & E.

Birch St
Signal
7-9 AM B / 10.4 - A / 3.5 -
10 AM - Noon A / 4.3 - A / 2.9 -
1-3 PM B / 11.9 - A / 4.0 -
4-6 PM A / 4.2 - A / 3.3 -
4 Alley & E.

Birch St TWSC
7-9 AM 0.5 D / 31.7 (NB) 0.5 D / 31.2 (SB)
10 AM - Noon 0.1 B / 13.6 (NB) 0.1 B / 14.1 (NB)
1-3 PM 0.2 C / 18.2 (SB) 0.2 C / 22.8 (SB)
4-6 PM 0.2 C / 20.6 (NB) 0.2 D / 25.2 (NB)
5 S. Brea Blvd
& Imperial
Hwy
Signal
7-9 AM E / 55.4 - E / 56.7 -
10 AM - Noon D / 39. 9 - D / 41.2 -
1-3 PM D / 43.7 - D / 46.4 -
4-6 PM D / 50.7 - E / 56.9 -
6 S. Orange
Ave &
Imperial
Hwy
TWSC
7-9 AM 0.4 D / 29.6 (NB) 0.5 E / 39.5 (SB)
10 AM - Noon 0.3 C / 17.9 (NB) 0.3 C / 22.9 (SB)
1-3 PM 0.4 C / 21.6 (SB) 0.5 D / 32.7 (SB)
4-6 PM 0.4 D / 26.6 (SB) 0.6 E / 43.8 (SB)
City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 34 of 50 ends

Intersection Control Peak Hour
Existing (2023) Alternative 4
LOS /
Average
Delay
Worst Delay
LOS /
Average
Delay
Worst Delay
7 S. Flower
Ave &
Imperial
Hwy
TWSC
7-9 AM 37.5 F / >200 (SB) 24 F / >200 (SB)
10 AM - Noon 1.2 D / 30.3 (SB) 1.8 E / 36.9 (SB)
1-3 PM 1.7 F / 60.6 (SB) 5 F / 101.6 (SB)
4-6 PM 3.2 F / 98.0 (SB) 10.2 F / >200 (SB)
8 Sycamore
Ave &
Imperial
Hwy
TWSC
7-9 AM 2.4 F / >200 (SB) 3.2 F / >200 (SB)
10 AM - Noon 0.5 E / 44.5 (SB) 0.6 F / 53.4 (SB)
1-3 PM 0.9 E / 46.4 (SB) 1.1 F / 60 (SB)
4-6 PM 1.1 F / 120.1 (NB) 2.1 F / >200 (NB)
Notes:

1. Whole intersection weighted average stopped delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections. Worst lane delay reported for two-way-stop-controlled (TWSC) intersections.

2. Delay operations were calculated using HCM 7th methodologies.

5. Bold symbolizes LOS E or worse
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.

Public Engagement
In June 2025, the City organized a public engagement event at the Public Works Yard. 450 mailers were sent to nearby residents, businesses, and other stakeholders as notification. Project alternatives evaluated in this study were exhibited for a 2-hour period to engage with attendees and solicit feedback. Below is a summary of the comments received during the event, and photos of the direct comments and the event are provided as Appendix H.

Alternative 1 – Existing
 Respondents notice significant queueing on Imperial Highway during peak periods and accidents or near-misses at the S. Flower Ave intersection  On street parking north of the existing commercial driveway along S. Flower Ave leads to sight-distance concerns
Alternative 2 – Right-in-right-out
 Respondents are generally supportive of raised median closure along Imperial Highway  Respondents recognize that queueing for the westbound right turn would likely still occur along Imperial Highway during peak periods
 Respondents suggest that westbound right turns (from Imperial Highway to S. Flower Ave) could be channelized into a turning lane to facilitate turning movement City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 35 of 50 ends

 Change in circulation would require public education for potential changes to pick-up and drop-off traffic patterns
 Other improvements should be considered to increase awareness and foster safe behaviors
 Respondents were slightly concerned of additional traffic along E. Birch St. due to recirculation of traffic
Alternative 3A/3B – Cul-de-sac
 With S. Flower Ave reconfigured into a cul-de-sac in this alternative, respondents had concerns about drivers potentially stopping illegally along Imperial Highway at the existing intersection for convenience
 The cul-de-sac should be designed to limit congestion at the street terminus and to accommodate large vehicles including emergency response and school buses  The new sidewalk component of the cul-de-sac should be designed to retain the aesthetics of the school frontage
 Other improvements should be considered to increase awareness and foster safe behaviors
 Respondents were slightly concerned of additional traffic along E. Birch St. due to recirculation of traffic
Alternative 4 – One way conversion
 Respondents are supportive of how this alternative would eliminate the northbound right turn (from S. Flower Ave to E. Birch St)
 Other improvements should be considered to increase awareness and foster safety (i.e. raised crosswalk at S. Flower Ave & Imperial Hwy)
 Improvement should be paired with public education and engagement City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 36 of 50 ends

Conclusion
The implementation of Alternatives 2 and 3 would both reduce vehicle conflicts, with Alternative 3 offering additional benefits by also improving LOS at the intersections of South Brea Boulevard & Imperial Highway and at South Flower Avenue & Imperial Highway. While all alternatives reduce turning conflicts, Alternatives 3 and 4 eliminate queue spillback of the westbound right-turning vehicles onto Imperial Highway during peak traffic, reducing the risk of rear-end and sideswipe collisions. Prior to implementation, a feasibility study should be conducted to assess right-of-way constraints and the impacts on utilities required to support roadway reconfiguration. Engineering documents for the preferred alternative should be developed after stakeholder discussions to advance funding opportunities. The table below summarizes the benefits and tradeoffs between the evaluated alternatives.

Alternative Benefits Tradeoffs

1. No Build
(No Change)
- No cost or implementation time
- Maintains current access and circulation
patterns
- No improvement to existing conditions
(e.g., pedestrian conflicts, queue spillback)

2. Right-In,
Right-Out
(RIRO)
(3–6 months, low
cost)
- Removes high-risk turning conflicts
- Reduces queueing and intersection
delay
- Enhances pedestrian safety
- Minimal drainage and lighting impacts
- Supports median continuity along
Imperial Hwy
- Alters circulation patterns; requires
rerouting and more circuitous paths
- Caltrans encroachment permit may be
needed
- Mountable design required for emergency
access

3. Cul-de-Sac
(18-36 months,
high cost)
- Removes all turning conflicts at S.

Flower Ave & Imperial Hwy
- Eliminates queue spillback onto Imperial
Hwy
- Promotes walkability and supports
downtown design goals
- Aligns with long-term circulation plans
- High cost and design complexity
- Right-of-way and utility impacts
- Disrupts local vehicle access - requires
rerouting and more circuitous paths
- May increase travel speeds on Imperial Hwy
adjacent to school due to reduced friction
- Impact to Caltrans right-of-way, require
Caltrans encroachment permit

4. One-Way
Southbound
(6-12 months, low
cost)
- Removes high-risk turning conflicts
- Eliminates queue spillback on onto
Imperial Hwy
- Improves pedestrian safety with
midblock calming
- Reduces cut-through traffic
- Enhances predictability and local access
- Minimal impact to Caltrans facilities
- Changes neighborhood circulation; requires
rerouting and more circuitous paths
- Requires substantial public outreach and
driver education
- Semi-permanent; future reversals may
require redesign
- May require Caltrans encroachment permit
City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 37 of 50 ends

Attachments
Appendix A – Brea Olinda Unified School District (BOUSD) Masterplan for Improvements Appendix B – Traffic Count Data
Appendix C – Intersection Level of Service Worksheets (Existing) Appendix D – Improvement Alternatives
Appendix E, F, G – Improvement Alternatives Level of Service Worksheets Appendix H – Feedback from Public Engagement

City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 38 of 50 ends

Appendix A
BOUSD Masterplan for Improvements

Page 39 of 50 ends

Appendix B
Traffic Count Data

T101823
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC4283
Thu, Oct 26, 23 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 7
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 1 3 0 2 3 0 1 0.5 0.5 2 1 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 1 45 16 25 146 5 4 5 2 36 2 25 312 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 3 55 27 39 181 9 2 7 1 38 7 21 390 1 0 0 0 1
7:30 AM 0 75 30 48 188 5 10 8 5 64 16 51 500 1 0 0 0 1
7:45 AM 8 131 49 92 204 10 6 13 7 83 27 99 729 4 0 0 0 4 8:00 AM 8 127 62 124 210 16 7 21 2 89 17 95 778 1 0 0 0 1 8:15 AM 2 90 44 91 180 15 3 14 7 50 19 56 571 1 0 0 0 1 8:30 AM 5 86 36 66 180 11 7 9 7 59 10 51 527 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 6 65 54 53 159 9 8 9 6 59 14 29 471 2 0 0 0 2
VOLUMES 33 674 318 538 1,448 80 47 86 37 478 112 427 4,288 10 0 0 0 10 APPROACH % 3% 65% 31% 26% 70% 4% 28% 51% 22% 47% 11% 42% APP/DEPART 1,035 / 1,148 2,066 / 1,973 170 / 942 1,017 / 225 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 23 434 191 373 774 52 23 57 23 281 73 301 2,611 APPROACH % 4% 66% 29% 31% 65% 4% 22% 55% 22% 43% 11% 46% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.826 0.856 0.858 0.783 0.838
APP/DEPART 654 / 758 1,199 / 1,084 103 / 621 655 / 148 0 09:45 AM 3 55 33 41 124 18 10 10 6 36 18 44 398 3 0 0 0 3 10:00 AM 7 75 40 51 90 11 14 8 7 30 9 38 380 4 0 0 0 4
10:15 AM 6 67 39 59 91 14 12 20 9 55 12 52 436 5 0 0 0 5 10:30 AM 7 80 32 53 96 13 13 13 6 38 14 59 424 0 0 0 0 0 10:45 AM 7 74 36 68 91 10 6 13 5 51 22 53 436 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 AM 10 72 32 57 91 16 13 15 9 44 15 46 420 1 0 0 0 1 11:15 AM 15 54 44 52 92 14 6 14 9 53 14 51 418 3 1 0 0 4 11:30 AM 9 76 51 56 100 22 13 22 5 66 29 57 506 1 0 0 0 1 11:45 AM 10 98 45 72 93 19 17 22 9 39 29 68 521 1 1 0 0 2 VOLUMES 74 651 352 509 868 137 104 137 65 412 162 468 3,959 18 2 0 0 20 APPROACH % 7% 59% 32% 34% 57% 9% 34% 45% 21% 40% 16% 45% APP/DEPART 1,095 / 1,225 1,516 / 1,363 306 / 998 1,042 / 373 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 44 300 172 237 376 71 49 73 32 202 87 222 1,873 APPROACH % 8% 57% 33% 35% 55% 10% 32% 47% 21% 40% 17% 43% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.847 0.927 0.802 0.840 0.895
APP/DEPART 522 / 573 686 / 616 154 / 482 511 / 202 0
S Brea Blvd

NORTH LEG
E Birch St WEST LEG EAST LEG E Birch St

SOUTH LEG
S Brea Blvd

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 7:00 AM 2 0 1 2 5 1 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 1 2 1 4 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 3 4 0 2 9 2 3 0 1 6 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 1
7:45 AM 2 3 5 1 11 1 2 1 1 5 0 0 2 0 2 1 1 2 0 4
8:00 AM 2 6 4 2 14 2 6 1 1 10 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 1 0 1
8:15 AM 1 0 0 3 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 1 5 5 1 12 1 5 5 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 2 0 1 3 0 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 11 21 17 13 62 8 19 8 6 41 2 0 6 7 15 1 2 3 0 6
9:45 AM 5 3 2 4 14 4 2 2 4 12 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
10:00 AM 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:15 AM 0 1 1 8 10 0 1 0 7 8 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0
10:30 AM 1 0 0 2 3 1 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:45 AM 5 7 2 6 20 4 3 2 5 14 1 0 0 1 2 0 4 0 0 4
11:00 AM 0 5 5 3 13 0 2 2 2 6 0 0 1 1 2 0 3 2 0 5
11:15 AM 4 1 2 3 10 3 1 2 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2
11:30 AM 0 1 4 0 5 0 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1
11:45 AM 5 11 7 1 24 5 8 6 1 20 0 1 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 2
TOTAL 21 30 24 28 103 18 18 18 24 78 1 3 3 3 10 2 9 3 1 15 7:45 AM 6 14 14 7 41 5 13 7 3 28 0 0 4 4 8 1 1 3 0 5
11:00 AM 9 18 18 7 52 8 11 13 5 37 0 2 2 1 5 1 5 3 1 10

U-TURNS
S Brea Blvd S Brea Blvd E Birch St E Birch St

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Brea
S Brea Blvd
E Birch St

BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIANS

AM MD AM
7:45 AM
MD
11:00 AM
ALL PED + BIKE & SCOOTER ADULT PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
T101823
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC4283
Thu, Oct 26, 23 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 7
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 1 3 0 2 3 0 1 0.5 0.5 2 1 1 0 0 0 0
1:00 PM 6 129 58 58 106 21 15 17 6 65 18 73 572 3 1 0 0 4 1:15 PM 11 93 48 72 108 12 18 25 8 66 27 75 563 1 0 0 0 1 1:30 PM 13 93 61 69 103 16 16 29 6 52 27 73 558 2 0 0 0 2 1:45 PM 11 113 67 83 136 7 16 28 7 57 26 91 642 1 0 0 0 1 2:00 PM 6 109 51 73 133 14 12 18 9 64 17 63 569 2 0 0 0 2 2:15 PM 17 126 45 79 123 13 10 26 10 81 29 105 664 5 0 0 0 5 2:30 PM 8 129 35 75 143 16 18 19 7 80 23 89 642 2 1 0 0 3 2:45 PM 9 160 63 75 131 6 16 14 6 54 32 86 652 5 0 0 0 5 VOLUMES 81 952 428 584 983 105 121 176 59 519 199 655 4,885 21 2 0 0 23 APPROACH % 5% 64% 29% 35% 59% 6% 34% 49% 17% 38% 14% 48% APP/DEPART 1,482 / 1,730 1,674 / 1,582 356 / 1,188 1,373 / 385 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 40 524 194 302 530 49 56 77 32 279 101 343 2,542 APPROACH % 5% 68% 25% 34% 60% 6% 34% 47% 19% 39% 14% 47% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.814 0.938 0.897 0.841 0.950
APP/DEPART 772 / 924 882 / 855 165 / 573 723 / 190 0
4:00 PM 14 178 57 89 134 15 11 30 10 74 31 112 755 1 0 0 0 1 4:15 PM 10 154 74 100 137 23 15 26 6 78 24 94 741 0 1 0 0 1 4:30 PM 7 155 66 94 129 20 18 28 8 69 35 99 728 5 0 0 0 5 4:45 PM 15 171 60 97 151 24 15 20 5 88 33 94 773 2 0 0 0 2 5:00 PM 18 182 71 94 125 29 20 21 6 82 40 104 792 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 14 169 66 128 134 15 17 32 11 84 46 106 822 3 1 0 0 4 5:30 PM 8 160 64 84 122 21 16 30 8 85 29 119 746 5 0 0 0 5 5:45 PM 22 131 61 83 140 22 18 20 11 88 44 97 737 3 0 0 0 3 VOLUMES 108 1,300 519 769 1,072 169 130 207 65 648 282 825 6,115 19 2 0 0 21 APPROACH % 6% 67% 27% 38% 53% 8% 32% 51% 16% 37% 16% 47% APP/DEPART 1,946 / 2,257 2,012 / 1,804 402 / 1,495 1,755 / 559 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 55 682 261 403 532 89 68 103 30 339 148 423 3,144 APPROACH % 5% 68% 26% 39% 52% 9% 34% 51% 15% 37% 16% 46% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.930 0.922 0.838 0.964 0.952
APP/DEPART 1,008 / 1,174 1,025 / 911 201 / 767 910 / 292 0 S Brea Blvd

NORTH LEG
E Birch St WEST LEG EAST LEG E Birch St

SOUTH LEG
S Brea Blvd

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 1:00 PM 1 8 1 3 13 0 6 1 3 10 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 2
1:15 PM 1 9 4 1 15 1 5 3 1 10 0 3 1 0 4 0 1 0 0 1
1:30 PM 1 4 3 5 13 1 4 3 3 11 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0
1:45 PM 1 3 7 5 16 1 3 7 4 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
2:00 PM 3 5 3 2 13 3 5 3 2 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:15 PM 0 6 0 2 8 0 5 0 2 7 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
2:30 PM 0 8 2 7 17 0 6 2 4 12 0 2 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 0
2:45 PM 6 3 0 2 11 6 3 0 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 13 46 20 27 106 12 37 19 21 89 0 7 1 5 13 1 2 0 1 4 BEGIN PEAK HR 9 19 5 10 43
4:00 PM 3 4 4 0 11 2 4 2 0 8 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 6 8 12 8 34 5 6 12 5 28 1 1 0 3 5 0 1 0 0 1
4:30 PM 4 6 18 2 30 4 6 17 2 29 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 15 9 13 12 49 15 8 12 12 47 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 5:00 PM 25 7 14 9 55 23 5 13 7 48 0 1 1 2 4 2 1 0 0 3
5:15 PM 14 11 23 17 65 13 10 23 17 63 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 5:30 PM 16 8 13 5 42 16 8 13 5 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 7 19 22 23 71 7 19 22 23 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 90 72 119 76 357 85 66 114 71 336 2 3 5 5 15 3 3 0 0 6 67 31 61 41 200
2:00 PM 9 22 5 13 49 9 19 5 10 43 0 3 0 3 6 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 70 35 63 43 211 67 31 61 41 200 0 2 2 2 6 3 2 0 0 5

MD PM MD
2:00 PM
PM
4:45 PM
ALL PEDS + BIKE & SCOOTER
2:00 PM
BEGIN PEAK HR 4:45 PM

ADULT PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS

U-TURNS
S Brea Blvd S Brea Blvd E Birch St E Birch St

SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIANS

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Brea
S Brea Blvd
E Birch St
T101823
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC4283
Thu, Oct 26, 23 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 4
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: STOP N/S
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0 1 0 X X 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 0 0 5 0 0 4 0 46 0 3 59 1 118 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 2 1 2 0 0 5 0 72 3 4 57 1 147 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 3 0 2 0 0 8 0 74 10 5 123 1 226 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 2 1 6 0 0 3 0 140 13 7 222 1 395 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 6 0 7 0 0 3 0 194 14 8 175 3 410 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 4 0 5 0 0 2 1 137 10 1 127 2 289 1 0 0 0 1
8:30 AM 1 0 3 0 0 4 0 114 3 6 119 2 252 0 0 1 0 1
8:45 AM 5 0 3 0 0 4 0 115 5 6 98 2 238 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 23 2 33 0 0 33 1 892 58 40 980 13 2,077 1 0 1 0 2 APPROACH % 39% 3% 56% 0% 0% 100% 0% 94% 6% 4% 95% 1%
APP/DEPART 59 / 16 33 / 99 952 / 925 1,033 / 1,037 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 13 1 21 0 0 12 1 585 40 22 643 8 1,348
APPROACH % 36% 3% 58% 0% 0% 100% 0% 93% 6% 3% 96% 1%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.692 0.750 0.754 0.732 0.822
APP/DEPART 36 / 10 12 / 63 627 / 606 673 / 669 0
09:45 AM 1 0 5 0 0 4 0 82 2 5 99 2 200 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 AM 1 1 9 0 0 3 1 93 2 3 77 0 190 0 0 1 0 1
10:15 AM 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 112 5 0 119 0 242 0 0 0 0 0
10:30 AM 2 0 5 0 0 7 0 91 5 2 104 1 217 0 0 0 0 0
10:45 AM 1 0 5 0 0 7 0 111 8 4 118 0 254 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 1 1 2 0 0 5 0 100 5 6 101 3 224 0 0 0 0 0
11:15 AM 2 0 4 0 0 1 0 97 10 7 114 2 237 0 0 0 0 0
11:30 AM 5 1 6 0 0 1 0 113 15 5 148 2 296 0 0 0 0 0
11:45 AM 1 1 4 0 0 7 2 128 11 7 135 2 298 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 16 4 42 0 0 37 3 927 63 39 1,015 12 2,159 0 0 1 0 1 APPROACH % 26% 6% 68% 0% 0% 100% 0% 93% 6% 4% 95% 1%
APP/DEPART 62 / 19 37 / 102 994 / 969 1,066 / 1,069 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 9 3 16 0 0 14 2 438 41 25 498 9 1,055
APPROACH % 32% 11% 57% 0% 0% 100% 0% 91% 9% 5% 94% 2%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.583 0.500 0.853 0.858 0.885
APP/DEPART 28 / 14 14 / 66 481 / 454 532 / 521 0
S Orange Ave

NORTH LEG
E Birch St WEST LEG EAST LEG E Birch St

SOUTH LEG
S Orange Ave

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 7:00 AM 3 2 0 1 6 2 2 0 1 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 2 2 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
7:30 AM 8 3 0 1 12 2 3 0 0 5 4 0 0 1 5 2 0 0 0 2
7:45 AM 2 2 1 0 5 2 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
8:00 AM 1 5 1 0 7 1 5 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 4 1 1 6 0 3 0 1 4 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 18 21 3 3 45 9 19 1 2 31 5 1 2 1 9 4 1 0 0 5
9:45 AM 0 2 1 1 4 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 AM 2 1 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
10:15 AM 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:30 AM 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:45 AM 3 2 0 0 5 3 2 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:15 AM 0 5 0 0 5 0 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:45 AM 0 4 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 8 16 2 2 28 7 11 1 2 21 0 5 1 0 6 1 0 0 0 1
7:45 AM 5 10 2 0 17 5 9 1 0 15 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1
11:00 AM 1 9 0 0 10 1 5 0 0 6 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0

U-TURNS
S Orange Ave S Orange Ave E Birch St E Birch St

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Brea
S Orange Ave
E Birch St

BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIANS

AM MD AM
7:45 AM
MD
11:00 AM
ALL PED + BIKE & SCOOTER ADULT PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
T101823
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC4283
Thu, Oct 26, 23 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 4
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: STOP N/S
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0 1 0 X X 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 PM 3 1 5 0 0 4 0 130 2 1 158 1 305 0 0 1 0 1
1:15 PM 2 0 6 0 0 1 0 134 5 2 160 2 312 0 0 0 0 0
1:30 PM 0 0 6 0 0 2 0 151 9 0 147 1 316 0 0 0 0 0
1:45 PM 3 1 9 0 0 2 1 170 7 3 160 3 359 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 PM 2 2 9 0 0 2 0 137 8 1 146 1 308 0 0 0 1 1
2:15 PM 0 0 13 0 0 4 0 141 11 3 221 2 395 0 0 0 1 1
2:30 PM 3 0 7 0 0 8 1 129 2 2 168 4 324 0 0 0 0 0
2:45 PM 2 0 7 0 0 3 1 150 4 4 154 2 327 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 15 4 62 0 0 26 3 1,142 48 16 1,314 16 2,649 0 0 1 2 3 APPROACH % 19% 5% 77% 0% 0% 100% 0% 96% 4% 1% 97% 1%
APP/DEPART 81 / 23 26 / 64 1,194 / 1,206 1,348 / 1,356 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 8 3 38 0 0 16 2 577 28 9 695 10 1,388
APPROACH % 16% 6% 78% 0% 0% 100% 0% 95% 5% 1% 97% 1%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.942 0.500 0.853 0.789 0.876
APP/DEPART 49 / 15 16 / 37 607 / 617 716 / 719 0
4:00 PM 4 1 5 0 0 6 2 167 7 2 218 3 415 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 1 3 6 0 0 14 3 187 11 5 178 7 415 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 1 5 0 0 7 1 181 11 5 208 3 422 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 1 2 8 0 0 7 2 157 14 11 198 3 403 0 0 1 0 1
5:00 PM 2 0 14 0 0 8 2 167 19 14 215 6 447 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 3 0 7 0 0 14 4 198 18 7 235 6 492 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 7 2 6 0 0 4 1 163 15 14 228 4 444 0 0 0 1 1
5:45 PM 3 1 11 0 0 8 0 142 25 16 210 7 423 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 21 10 62 0 0 68 15 1,362 120 74 1,690 39 3,463 0 0 1 1 2 APPROACH % 23% 11% 67% 0% 0% 100% 1% 91% 8% 4% 94% 2%
APP/DEPART 93 / 64 68 / 194 1,498 / 1,425 1,804 / 1,780 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 15 3 38 0 0 34 7 670 77 51 888 23 1,807
APPROACH % 27% 5% 68% 0% 0% 100% 1% 89% 10% 5% 92% 2%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.875 0.607 0.857 0.971 0.918
APP/DEPART 56 / 33 34 / 128 754 / 709 963 / 937 0
S Orange Ave

NORTH LEG
E Birch St WEST LEG EAST LEG E Birch St

SOUTH LEG
S Orange Ave

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 1:00 PM 2 2 0 0 4 2 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:15 PM 0 3 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
1:30 PM 2 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
1:45 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 PM 2 4 0 0 6 1 4 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
2:15 PM 0 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
2:30 PM 0 5 1 0 6 0 3 0 0 3 0 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
2:45 PM 1 2 0 0 3 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 7 22 1 0 30 6 15 0 0 21 1 7 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0
BEGIN PEAK HR 1 10 0 0 11
4:00 PM 1 5 1 0 7 0 4 0 0 4 1 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 3 1 0 0 4 2 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 2 1 0 3 0 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 0 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
5:00 PM 1 2 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 5 0 3 8 0 4 0 3 7 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 2 3 0 0 5 2 3 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 9 21 2 3 35 6 17 1 3 27 3 3 1 0 7 0 1 0 0 1
4 8 0 3 15
1:45 PM 2 13 1 0 16 1 10 0 0 11 1 3 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 5 10 0 3 18 4 8 0 3 15 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

MD PM MD
1:45 PM
PM
5:00 PM
ALL PEDS + BIKE & SCOOTER
1:45 PM
BEGIN PEAK HR 5:00 PM

ADULT PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS

U-TURNS
S Orange Ave
Queue WB PM
S Orange Ave E Birch St E Birch St

SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIANS

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Brea
S Orange Ave
E Birch St
T101823
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC4283
Thu, Oct 26, 23 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 6
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 4 1 6 7 3 1 1 47 3 18 60 0 151 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 4 2 7 4 1 1 3 60 6 24 59 1 172 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 9 6 2 10 1 3 5 69 3 19 98 3 228 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 55 21 1 7 2 6 8 131 13 24 144 3 415 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 31 21 2 14 2 8 6 181 3 15 177 3 463 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 2 5 12 8 1 1 1 154 5 32 122 4 347 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 2 4 11 4 2 4 4 104 1 21 123 4 284 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 2 7 8 10 3 1 11 114 2 22 104 5 289 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 109 67 49 64 15 25 39 860 36 175 887 23 2,349 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 48% 30% 22% 62% 14% 24% 4% 92% 4% 16% 82% 2% APP/DEPART 225 / 129 104 / 226 935 / 973 1,085 / 1,021 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 90 51 26 33 7 19 19 570 22 92 566 14 1,509
APPROACH % 54% 31% 16% 56% 12% 32% 3% 93% 4% 14% 84% 2% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.542 0.615 0.804 0.862 0.815
APP/DEPART 167 / 84 59 / 121 611 / 629 672 / 675 0
09:45 AM 2 2 8 5 1 1 0 85 0 14 103 2 223 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 AM 0 0 9 2 3 5 5 103 2 13 73 2 217 0 0 0 0 0
10:15 AM 10 4 10 5 3 4 3 106 4 15 93 2 259 0 0 0 0 0
10:30 AM 4 2 12 6 0 2 2 100 4 16 105 2 255 0 0 0 0 0
10:45 AM 3 3 11 3 1 2 1 94 2 12 119 3 254 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 1 3 8 3 1 3 1 108 2 13 101 3 247 0 0 0 0 0
11:15 AM 4 2 15 9 1 5 4 90 0 12 113 2 257 0 0 0 0 0
11:30 AM 7 1 21 13 0 4 4 128 5 19 134 4 340 0 0 1 0 1
11:45 AM 3 0 4 1 1 1 5 102 0 19 146 2 284 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 34 17 98 47 11 27 25 916 19 133 987 22 2,337 0 0 1 0 1 APPROACH % 23% 11% 66% 55% 13% 32% 3% 95% 2% 12% 86% 2% APP/DEPART 149 / 64 85 / 163 961 / 1,061 1,142 / 1,049 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 15 6 48 26 3 13 14 428 7 63 494 11 1,129
APPROACH % 22% 9% 70% 62% 7% 31% 3% 95% 2% 11% 87% 2%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.595 0.618 0.815 0.850 0.828
APP/DEPART 69 / 31 42 / 73 450 / 502 568 / 523 0
S Flower Ave

NORTH LEG
E Birch St WEST LEG EAST LEG E Birch St

SOUTH LEG
S Flower Ave

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 7:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 2 2 1 0 5 2 2 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 5 3 19 0 27 2 3 12 0 17 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 7 0 9
7:45 AM 5 5 48 1 59 2 2 22 1 27 3 0 2 0 5 0 3 24 0 27
8:00 AM 2 8 25 0 35 1 8 22 0 31 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 3
8:15 AM 2 0 8 0 10 2 0 8 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 5 6 0 11 0 5 6 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 17 23 113 1 154 9 20 77 1 107 6 0 2 0 8 2 3 34 0 39 9:45 AM 2 1 0 1 4 0 1 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 AM 1 1 6 0 8 1 1 5 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
10:15 AM 1 0 16 0 17 1 0 14 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
10:30 AM 1 1 3 0 5 1 1 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:45 AM 1 2 1 0 4 1 2 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:15 AM 1 1 8 0 10 1 1 8 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:30 AM 0 1 10 0 11 0 0 10 0 10 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
11:45 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 7 9 45 1 62 5 6 42 1 54 2 3 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 3
7:45 AM 9 13 87 1 110 5 10 58 1 74 4 0 2 0 6 0 3 27 0 30 11:00 AM 1 4 19 0 24 1 1 19 0 21 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

U-TURNS
S Flower Ave S Flower Ave E Birch St E Birch St

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Brea
S Flower Ave
E Birch St

BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIANS

AM MD AM
7:45 AM
MD
11:00 AM
ALL PED + BIKE & SCOOTER ADULT PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
T101823
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC4283
Thu, Oct 26, 23 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 6
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 PM 5 3 11 2 0 0 5 128 3 15 150 2 324 0 0 3 0 3
1:15 PM 3 6 9 3 1 5 4 148 1 8 169 1 358 0 0 0 0 0
1:30 PM 0 4 14 6 1 1 5 140 0 9 147 1 328 0 0 0 0 0
1:45 PM 4 10 8 7 1 0 7 164 2 14 152 8 377 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 PM 5 6 0 14 4 10 16 141 6 13 144 10 369 0 0 1 0 1
2:15 PM 22 25 4 18 3 15 5 144 2 8 176 3 425 0 0 1 0 1
2:30 PM 5 2 11 6 2 12 6 124 1 17 170 2 358 0 0 1 0 1
2:45 PM 3 2 18 3 2 3 2 155 1 12 158 3 362 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 47 58 75 59 14 46 50 1,144 16 96 1,266 30 2,907 0 0 6 0 6 APPROACH % 26% 32% 42% 50% 12% 39% 4% 94% 1% 7% 91% 2%
APP/DEPART 180 / 138 119 / 126 1,216 / 1,278 1,392 / 1,365 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 36 43 23 45 10 37 34 573 11 52 642 23 1,532
APPROACH % 35% 42% 23% 49% 11% 40% 5% 92% 2% 7% 90% 3%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.500 0.639 0.897 0.948 0.899
APP/DEPART 102 / 100 92 / 73 621 / 641 717 / 718 0
4:00 PM 5 1 13 4 0 2 4 162 1 17 216 5 430 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 8 2 11 5 0 5 3 180 4 9 187 6 420 0 0 1 0 1
4:30 PM 3 1 9 4 2 4 7 172 2 13 192 3 412 0 0 1 0 1
4:45 PM 3 1 11 9 0 3 6 165 2 22 212 5 439 0 0 3 0 3
5:00 PM 9 3 6 2 1 5 4 155 1 22 224 6 438 0 0 1 0 1
5:15 PM 9 5 17 8 1 3 7 196 4 16 213 2 481 0 0 0 1 1
5:30 PM 5 1 18 6 0 3 4 176 2 9 244 5 473 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 15 2 12 7 0 6 5 144 5 14 230 3 443 0 0 1 0 1
VOLUMES 57 16 97 45 4 31 40 1,350 21 122 1,718 35 3,544 0 0 7 1 8 APPROACH % 34% 9% 57% 56% 5% 39% 3% 95% 1% 7% 92% 2%
APP/DEPART 170 / 91 80 / 147 1,418 / 1,493 1,876 / 1,813 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 38 11 53 23 2 17 20 671 12 61 911 16 1,838
APPROACH % 37% 11% 52% 55% 5% 40% 3% 95% 2% 6% 92% 2%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.823 0.808 0.851 0.958 0.953
APP/DEPART 102 / 47 42 / 75 705 / 748 989 / 968 0
S Flower Ave

NORTH LEG
E Birch St WEST LEG EAST LEG E Birch St

SOUTH LEG
S Flower Ave

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 1:00 PM 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:15 PM 3 3 0 0 6 3 2 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
1:30 PM 1 2 1 0 4 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
1:45 PM 3 2 3 0 8 3 1 3 0 7 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 PM 2 2 26 0 30 1 2 23 0 26 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 3
2:15 PM 0 7 88 0 95 0 5 55 0 60 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 32 0 33
2:30 PM 1 4 2 0 7 0 3 2 0 5 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
2:45 PM 1 2 0 0 3 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 11 23 121 0 155 9 16 85 0 110 2 6 1 0 9 0 1 35 0 36 BEGIN PEAK HR 4 11 83 0 98
4:00 PM 2 2 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 2 3 1 0 6 1 2 1 0 4 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 1 3 1 0 5 1 3 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 0 2 0 1 3 0 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 1 0 3 1 5 1 0 3 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 1 5 1 0 7 1 2 1 0 4 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 2 0 2 0 4 2 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 2 1 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 11 16 8 2 37 8 12 8 2 30 3 4 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0
6 3 6 1 16
1:45 PM 6 15 119 0 140 4 11 83 0 98 2 3 1 0 6 0 1 35 0 36 5:00 PM 6 6 6 1 19 6 3 6 1 16 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIANS

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Brea
S Flower Ave
E Birch St
BEGIN PEAK HR 5:00 PM

ADULT PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS

U-TURNS
S Flower Ave S Flower Ave E Birch St E Birch St

MD PM MD
1:45 PM
PM
5:00 PM
ALL PEDS + BIKE & SCOOTER
1:45 PM
T101823
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC4283
Thu, Oct 26, 23 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 5
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: STOP N/S
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 78 1 140 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 0 84 0 155 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 75 6 8 120 0 210 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 128 11 28 169 2 340 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 190 6 7 192 0 401 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 173 0 0 157 0 332 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 118 0 0 149 1 270 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 131 0 0 131 3 265 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 5 0 3 2 0 2 2 946 23 43 1,080 7 2,113 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 63% 0% 38% 50% 0% 50% 0% 97% 2% 4% 96% 1%
APP/DEPART 8 / 9 4 / 66 971 / 951 1,130 / 1,087 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 5 0 2 2 0 1 2 609 17 35 667 3 1,343
APPROACH % 71% 0% 29% 67% 0% 33% 0% 97% 3% 5% 95% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.583 0.250 0.801 0.886 0.837
APP/DEPART 7 / 5 3 / 52 628 / 613 705 / 673 0
09:45 AM 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 98 0 0 119 0 220 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 114 0 0 88 1 203 0 0 0 0 0
10:15 AM 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 119 1 1 110 0 233 0 0 0 0 0
10:30 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 1 0 122 1 242 0 0 0 0 0
10:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 106 1 2 134 0 244 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 117 0 0 116 0 236 0 0 1 0 1
11:15 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 112 2 3 128 0 247 0 0 0 0 0
11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 160 0 0 156 0 317 0 0 0 0 0
11:45 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 107 0 0 167 0 276 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 2 1 6 1 1 2 2 1,050 5 6 1,140 2 2,219 0 0 1 0 1 APPROACH % 22% 11% 67% 25% 25% 50% 0% 99% 0% 1% 99% 0%
APP/DEPART 9 / 5 4 / 12 1,058 / 1,057 1,148 / 1,145 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 1 4 0 0 2 1 496 2 3 567 0 1,077
APPROACH % 0% 20% 80% 0% 0% 100% 0% 99% 0% 1% 99% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.625 0.500 0.781 0.853 0.849
APP/DEPART 5 / 2 2 / 5 500 / 500 570 / 570 0
DWY

NORTH LEG
E Birch St WEST LEG EAST LEG E Birch St

SOUTH LEG
DWY

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 7:00 AM 1 2 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 2 1 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 3 4 0 0 7 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 3
7:45 AM 7 19 0 0 26 5 10 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 11
8:00 AM 2 2 0 0 4 1 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 3 1 0 0 4 3 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 1 4 0 0 5 1 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
8:45 AM 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 20 34 0 0 54 12 22 0 0 34 5 0 0 0 5 3 12 0 0 15
9:45 AM 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 AM 1 3 0 0 4 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
10:15 AM 1 4 0 0 5 1 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
10:30 AM 1 3 0 0 4 1 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:45 AM 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:15 AM 1 2 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
11:30 AM 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
11:45 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 9 16 0 0 25 7 11 0 0 18 1 3 0 0 4 1 2 0 0 3
7:45 AM 13 26 0 0 39 10 16 0 0 26 1 0 0 0 1 2 10 0 0 12 11:00 AM 4 4 0 0 8 3 1 0 0 4 0 3 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1

BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIANS

AM MD AM
7:45 AM
MD
11:00 AM
ALL PED + BIKE & SCOOTER ADULT PEDESTRIAN CROSSING

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Brea
DWY
E Birch St

U-TURNS
DWY DWY E Birch St E Birch St
T101823
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC4283
Thu, Oct 26, 23 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 5
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: STOP N/S
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 141 0 0 167 0 308 0 0 0 0 0
1:15 PM 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 158 2 0 175 0 339 0 0 0 0 0
1:30 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 155 4 3 159 0 322 0 0 0 0 0
1:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 169 10 7 174 3 363 0 0 0 1 1
2:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 3 2 149 4 0 164 3 326 0 0 0 1 1
2:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 158 7 9 187 2 364 0 0 0 0 0
2:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 140 0 0 190 0 332 0 0 0 0 0
2:45 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 175 0 0 173 0 349 0 0 1 0 1
VOLUMES 2 0 4 2 0 4 3 1,245 27 19 1,389 8 2,706 0 0 1 2 3 APPROACH % 33% 0% 67% 33% 0% 67% 0% 98% 2% 1% 98% 1%
APP/DEPART 6 / 11 6 / 46 1,276 / 1,253 1,418 / 1,396 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 0 1 2 0 3 3 616 21 16 715 8 1,387
APPROACH % 0% 0% 100% 40% 0% 60% 0% 96% 3% 2% 96% 1%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.250 0.417 0.894 0.936 0.953
APP/DEPART 1 / 11 5 / 37 640 / 621 741 / 718 0
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 174 2 2 238 0 419 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 193 1 0 200 0 399 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 184 1 1 209 1 398 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 184 1 0 238 0 427 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 162 1 1 252 0 417 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 3 0 3 0 0 0 3 218 0 0 229 0 456 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 195 5 0 260 1 463 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 162 1 0 247 1 412 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 6 0 12 2 0 1 6 1,472 12 4 1,873 3 3,391 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 33% 0% 67% 67% 0% 33% 0% 99% 1% 0% 100% 0%
APP/DEPART 18 / 9 3 / 16 1,490 / 1,486 1,880 / 1,880 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 4 0 9 0 0 0 3 759 7 1 979 1 1,763
APPROACH % 31% 0% 69% 0% 0% 0% 0% 99% 1% 0% 100% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.542 0.000 0.870 0.940 0.952
APP/DEPART 13 / 4 0 / 8 769 / 768 981 / 983 0
DWY

NORTH LEG
E Birch St WEST LEG EAST LEG E Birch St

SOUTH LEG
DWY

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 1:00 PM 0 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
1:15 PM 3 3 0 0 6 3 1 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1
1:30 PM 2 3 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
1:45 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 PM 4 10 0 0 14 3 10 0 0 13 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
2:15 PM 2 67 0 0 69 0 16 0 0 16 0 1 0 0 1 2 50 0 0 52
2:30 PM 1 8 0 0 9 0 6 0 0 6 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
2:45 PM 1 3 0 0 4 1 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 13 98 0 0 111 9 39 0 0 48 2 8 0 0 10 2 51 0 0 53
BEGIN PEAK HR 3 33 0 0 36
4:00 PM 3 2 0 0 5 1 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 3 2 0 0 5 2 1 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 2 2 0 0 4 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
4:45 PM 0 4 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
5:00 PM 4 2 0 0 6 3 2 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 9 0 0 9 0 4 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1
5:30 PM 3 6 0 0 9 3 4 0 0 7 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 2 9 0 0 11 2 6 0 0 8 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 17 36 0 0 53 13 22 0 0 35 4 10 0 0 14 0 4 0 0 4
6 12 0 0 18
1:45 PM 7 86 0 0 93 3 33 0 0 36 2 3 0 0 5 2 50 0 0 52
4:45 PM 7 21 0 0 28 6 12 0 0 18 1 6 0 0 7 0 3 0 0 3

MD PM MD
1:45 PM
PM
4:45 PM
ALL PEDS + BIKE & SCOOTER
1:45 PM
BEGIN PEAK HR 4:45 PM

ADULT PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS

U-TURNS
DWY DWY E Birch St E Birch St

SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIANS

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Brea
DWY
E Birch St
T101823
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC4283
Thu, Oct 26, 23 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 8
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 58 36 34 21 133 29 9 332 44 29 281 14 1,020 0 1 0 2 3 7:15 AM 61 51 21 29 162 36 17 384 47 30 311 10 1,159 1 1 1 0 3 7:30 AM 79 81 25 36 186 34 18 390 93 39 338 11 1,330 2 2 3 1 8 7:45 AM 134 153 55 46 193 44 29 350 130 40 382 18 1,574 0 1 1 2 4 8:00 AM 112 124 40 51 201 42 45 337 90 37 375 37 1,491 0 1 0 2 3 8:15 AM 91 77 36 69 163 31 33 362 90 35 352 19 1,358 1 3 1 5 10 8:30 AM 78 87 38 50 156 31 22 405 84 63 306 18 1,338 1 2 0 2 5 8:45 AM 78 98 45 40 154 26 18 302 97 54 306 16 1,234 0 1 0 3 4 VOLUMES 691 707 294 342 1,348 273 191 2,862 675 327 2,651 143 10,544 5 12 6 17 40 APPROACH % 41% 42% 17% 17% 68% 14% 5% 77% 18% 10% 84% 5% APP/DEPART 1,697 / 1,053 1,975 / 2,355 3,734 / 3,515 3,138 / 3,621 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 415 441 169 216 713 148 129 1,454 394 175 1,415 92 5,783 APPROACH % 40% 43% 16% 20% 66% 14% 7% 73% 20% 10% 84% 5% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.751 0.919 0.968 0.938 0.916
APP/DEPART 1,027 / 669 1,084 / 1,284 1,979 / 1,850 1,693 / 1,980 0 09:45 AM 65 67 37 31 119 33 23 289 64 56 257 11 1,052 4 1 2 3 10 10:00 AM 72 76 44 34 90 28 29 249 65 56 251 19 1,013 2 3 1 3 9 10:15 AM 66 73 47 28 82 19 14 268 62 53 226 23 961 2 1 2 4 9 10:30 AM 68 83 44 36 74 25 19 282 58 41 261 27 1,018 1 4 1 1 7 10:45 AM 67 77 50 35 85 23 19 282 56 45 235 25 999 1 2 3 6 12 11:00 AM 60 84 51 47 70 34 15 268 53 48 268 13 1,011 3 8 0 5 16 11:15 AM 70 63 53 36 84 29 28 256 59 61 247 31 1,017 4 4 1 5 14 11:30 AM 68 81 51 32 87 32 26 314 68 60 259 30 1,108 3 7 2 1 13 11:45 AM 99 115 61 22 93 34 25 285 62 61 283 20 1,160 1 5 1 3 10 VOLUMES 635 719 438 301 784 257 198 2,493 547 481 2,287 199 9,439 21 35 13 31 100 APPROACH % 35% 40% 24% 22% 57% 19% 6% 77% 17% 16% 76% 7% APP/DEPART 1,813 / 1,151 1,377 / 1,833 3,251 / 3,263 2,998 / 3,192 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 297 343 216 137 334 129 94 1,123 242 230 1,057 94 4,349 APPROACH % 34% 40% 25% 22% 54% 21% 6% 77% 17% 16% 76% 7% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.785 0.981 0.892 0.950 0.929
APP/DEPART 867 / 555 624 / 817 1,463 / 1,490 1,395 / 1,487 0 S Brea Blvd

NORTH LEG
Imperial Hwy WEST LEG EAST LEG Imperial Hwy

SOUTH LEG
S Brea Blvd

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 7:00 AM 0 2 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 0 1 0 0 1
7:15 AM 1 0 2 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 1 0 0 0 1
7:30 AM 4 0 2 3 9 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 3 6
7:45 AM 4 5 8 2 19 1 1 1 2 5 0 0 2 0 2 3 4 5 0 12
8:00 AM 0 4 11 2 17 0 4 3 1 8 0 0 3 1 4 0 0 5 0 5
8:15 AM 1 1 0 5 7 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 4 1 0 0 1 2
8:30 AM 0 2 0 6 8 0 2 0 3 5 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 1 1 4 3 9 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 4 0 4
TOTAL 11 15 28 23 77 2 7 4 9 22 2 3 9 10 24 7 5 15 4 31 9:45 AM 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 2
10:00 AM 3 0 6 2 11 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 5 1 7
10:15 AM 2 0 2 1 5 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 1
10:30 AM 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
10:45 AM 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
11:00 AM 3 0 1 1 5 2 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2
11:15 AM 2 0 1 4 7 1 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 4
11:30 AM 1 1 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
11:45 AM 1 0 5 2 8 1 0 1 1 3 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 3 0 3
TOTAL 13 1 17 15 46 10 0 2 5 17 0 1 3 4 8 3 0 12 6 21
7:45 AM 5 12 19 15 51 1 7 4 7 19 0 1 5 7 13 4 4 10 1 19 11:00 AM 7 1 8 7 23 5 0 1 4 10 0 1 2 1 4 2 0 5 2 9

U-TURNS
S Brea Blvd S Brea Blvd Imperial Hwy Imperial Hwy

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Brea
S Brea Blvd
Imperial Hwy

BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIANS

AM MD AM
7:45 AM
MD
11:00 AM
ALL PED + BIKE & SCOOTER ADULT PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
T101823
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC4283
Thu, Oct 26, 23 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 8
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 0 0 0 0
1:00 PM 93 124 54 29 92 28 39 246 73 68 310 29 1,185 3 3 0 1 7 1:15 PM 109 105 62 34 97 35 22 276 60 75 311 26 1,212 2 7 4 8 21 1:30 PM 72 112 51 40 116 38 23 291 65 59 327 24 1,218 3 8 3 4 18 1:45 PM 106 124 58 59 111 37 31 296 74 53 299 32 1,280 5 10 2 2 19 2:00 PM 96 114 59 46 138 33 32 298 71 69 282 22 1,260 2 3 3 5 13 2:15 PM 78 124 51 64 119 38 32 310 103 67 289 32 1,307 2 3 1 9 15 2:30 PM 89 126 63 54 136 32 25 305 119 97 329 28 1,403 1 7 0 1 9 2:45 PM 109 162 45 47 108 50 36 296 86 74 354 32 1,399 1 6 1 4 12 VOLUMES 752 991 443 373 917 291 240 2,318 651 562 2,501 225 10,378 19 47 14 34 114 APPROACH % 34% 45% 20% 23% 56% 18% 7% 72% 20% 17% 75% 7% APP/DEPART 2,205 / 1,503 1,628 / 2,149 3,223 / 3,168 3,322 / 3,558 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 372 526 218 211 501 153 125 1,209 379 307 1,254 114 5,418 APPROACH % 33% 47% 19% 24% 57% 17% 7% 70% 22% 18% 74% 7% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.885 0.965 0.957 0.913 0.959
APP/DEPART 1,122 / 784 884 / 1,193 1,718 / 1,657 1,694 / 1,784 0 4:00 PM 112 169 47 42 153 37 37 320 101 48 359 41 1,466 1 3 5 0 9 4:15 PM 108 152 50 45 144 49 40 316 71 65 372 39 1,451 2 7 2 1 12 4:30 PM 99 148 53 49 116 46 55 318 104 53 394 39 1,474 1 4 3 3 11 4:45 PM 109 183 57 37 157 58 30 370 93 52 335 32 1,513 3 6 1 7 17 5:00 PM 110 190 77 35 128 36 40 357 103 54 424 37 1,591 1 7 3 1 12 5:15 PM 100 182 59 57 144 46 50 411 112 59 394 47 1,661 1 5 0 2 8 5:30 PM 124 152 71 42 142 39 45 342 96 43 370 46 1,512 2 6 3 2 13 5:45 PM 102 143 47 40 130 48 41 277 90 64 396 42 1,420 2 10 2 2 16 VOLUMES 864 1,319 461 347 1,114 359 338 2,711 770 438 3,044 323 12,186 13 48 19 18 98 APPROACH % 33% 50% 17% 19% 60% 19% 9% 71% 20% 11% 80% 8% APP/DEPART 2,657 / 2,028 1,868 / 2,335 3,838 / 3,537 3,823 / 4,286 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 443 707 264 171 571 179 165 1,480 404 208 1,523 162 6,327 APPROACH % 31% 50% 19% 18% 60% 19% 8% 72% 20% 11% 80% 9% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.940 0.916 0.897 0.923 0.948
APP/DEPART 1,421 / 1,058 945 / 1,190 2,056 / 1,927 1,905 / 2,152 0 S Brea Blvd

NORTH LEG
Imperial Hwy WEST LEG EAST LEG Imperial Hwy

SOUTH LEG
S Brea Blvd

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 1:00 PM 3 2 1 2 8 2 2 1 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
1:15 PM 3 0 3 1 7 1 0 2 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 3
1:30 PM 0 0 3 2 5 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0
1:45 PM 2 1 0 3 6 1 1 0 2 4 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
2:00 PM 5 1 2 2 10 1 1 1 2 5 0 0 1 0 1 4 0 0 0 4
2:15 PM 8 3 6 3 20 3 1 3 1 8 1 0 0 1 2 4 2 3 1 10
2:30 PM 3 3 4 7 17 1 3 1 4 9 0 0 1 2 3 2 0 2 1 5
2:45 PM 2 1 1 2 6 1 1 1 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
TOTAL 26 11 20 22 79 10 9 10 15 44 1 0 4 5 10 15 2 6 2 25 BEGIN PEAK HR 6 6 6 9 27
4:00 PM 5 0 5 3 13 2 0 0 1 3 0 0 2 2 4 3 0 3 0 6
4:15 PM 1 2 3 4 10 0 1 3 0 4 1 1 0 2 4 0 0 0 2 2
4:30 PM 2 0 0 5 7 1 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 3
4:45 PM 2 3 2 5 12 2 0 0 2 4 0 2 1 0 3 0 1 1 3 5
5:00 PM 0 1 4 2 7 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 4 0 0 1 1 2
5:15 PM 2 4 0 6 12 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 5 9
5:30 PM 1 1 2 2 6 1 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3
5:45 PM 0 1 1 3 5 0 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1
TOTAL 13 12 17 30 72 7 3 5 9 24 1 4 5 7 17 5 5 7 14 31
4 1 2 4 11
2:00 PM 18 8 13 14 53 6 6 6 9 27 1 0 2 3 6 11 2 5 2 20
4:45 PM 5 9 8 15 37 4 1 2 4 11 0 3 3 1 7 1 5 3 10 19

SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIANS

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Brea
S Brea Blvd
Imperial Hwy
BEGIN PEAK HR 4:45 PM

ADULT PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS

U-TURNS
S Brea Blvd S Brea Blvd Imperial Hwy Imperial Hwy

MD PM MD
2:00 PM
PM
4:45 PM
ALL PEDS + BIKE & SCOOTER
2:00 PM
T101823
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC4283
Thu, Oct 26, 23 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 3
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: STOP N/S
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: X X 1 X X 1 X 3 0 X 3 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 0 0 6 0 0 3 0 384 1 0 319 3 716 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 9 0 0 3 0 425 1 0 349 2 789 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 13 0 0 4 0 444 1 0 385 4 851 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 455 1 0 444 5 913 0 1 0 0 1
8:00 AM 0 0 3 0 0 9 0 439 1 0 449 5 906 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 8 0 0 2 0 462 3 0 393 8 876 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 494 1 0 389 3 894 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 9 0 0 5 0 411 1 0 386 6 818 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 0 0 54 0 0 35 0 3,514 10 0 3,114 36 6,764 0 1 0 0 1 APPROACH % 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 97% 0% 100% 0% 0% 99% 1%
APP/DEPART 54 / 37 36 / 10 3,524 / 3,568 3,150 / 3,149 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 0 17 0 0 20 0 1,850 6 0 1,675 21 3,590
APPROACH % 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 95% 0% 100% 0% 0% 99% 1%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.531 0.583 0.937 0.934 0.982
APP/DEPART 17 / 22 21 / 6 1,856 / 1,867 1,696 / 1,695 0 09:45 AM 0 0 7 0 0 6 0 347 0 0 312 3 675 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 AM 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 339 0 0 320 5 669 0 0 0 0 0
10:15 AM 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 343 0 0 311 3 671 0 0 0 0 0
10:30 AM 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 350 3 0 331 3 694 0 0 0 0 0
10:45 AM 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 373 5 0 310 2 697 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 376 4 0 331 2 719 0 0 0 0 0
11:15 AM 0 0 7 0 0 5 0 365 1 0 348 10 736 0 0 0 0 0
11:30 AM 0 0 2 0 0 7 0 369 1 0 350 5 734 0 0 0 0 0
11:45 AM 0 0 10 0 0 5 0 368 1 0 351 2 737 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 0 0 46 0 0 42 0 3,230 15 0 2,964 35 6,332 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% 99% 1%
APP/DEPART 46 / 35 42 / 15 3,245 / 3,276 2,999 / 3,006 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 0 23 0 0 19 0 1,478 7 0 1,380 19 2,926
APPROACH % 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% 99% 1%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.575 0.679 0.977 0.977 0.993
APP/DEPART 23 / 19 19 / 7 1,485 / 1,501 1,399 / 1,399 0 S Orange Ave

NORTH LEG
Imperial Hwy WEST LEG EAST LEG Imperial Hwy

SOUTH LEG
S Orange Ave

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 7:00 AM 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 4 1 0 0 5 2 1 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 7 2 0 0 9 4 1 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3
8:00 AM 4 1 0 0 5 4 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 1 4 0 0 5 0 3 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 19 8 1 0 28 12 6 1 0 19 4 2 0 0 6 3 0 0 0 3
9:45 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 AM 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
10:15 AM 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
10:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 3 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
11:15 AM 3 1 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:45 AM 4 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 13 3 0 0 16 11 1 0 0 12 1 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1
7:45 12 3 0 0 15 9 2 0 0 11 0 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 3
11:00 AM 10 1 0 0 11 9 0 0 0 9 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIANS

AM MD AM
7:45 AM
MD
11:00 AM
ALL PED + BIKE & SCOOTER ADULT PEDESTRIAN CROSSING

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Brea
S Orange Ave
Imperial Hwy

U-TURNS
S Orange Ave S Orange Ave Imperial Hwy Imperial Hwy
T101823
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC4283
Thu, Oct 26, 23 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 3
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: STOP N/S
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: X X 1 X X 1 X 3 0 X 3 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 PM 0 0 4 0 0 8 0 342 9 0 418 5 786 0 0 0 0 0
1:15 PM 0 0 8 0 0 15 0 366 2 0 376 3 770 0 0 0 0 0
1:30 PM 0 0 7 0 0 15 0 370 4 0 419 3 818 0 0 0 0 0
1:45 PM 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 403 2 0 375 7 793 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 PM 0 0 5 0 0 4 0 399 3 0 398 12 821 0 0 0 0 0
2:15 PM 0 0 4 0 0 10 0 419 5 0 422 3 863 0 0 0 0 0
2:30 PM 0 0 5 0 0 7 0 437 4 0 394 3 850 0 0 0 0 0
2:45 PM 0 0 14 0 0 6 0 381 7 0 456 1 865 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 0 0 49 0 0 69 0 3,117 36 0 3,258 37 6,566 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 99% 1% 0% 99% 1%
APP/DEPART 49 / 37 69 / 36 3,153 / 3,166 3,295 / 3,327 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 0 28 0 0 27 0 1,636 19 0 1,670 19 3,399
APPROACH % 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 99% 1% 0% 99% 1%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.500 0.675 0.938 0.924 0.982
APP/DEPART 28 / 19 27 / 19 1,655 / 1,664 1,689 / 1,697 0 4:00 PM 0 0 7 0 0 2 0 410 3 0 465 5 892 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 411 3 0 467 6 894 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 410 3 0 478 10 906 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 0 0 3 0 0 6 0 459 3 0 424 12 907 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 6 0 0 9 0 482 2 0 496 6 1,001 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 514 10 0 481 8 1,022 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 8 0 0 10 0 447 5 0 476 6 952 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 0 8 0 0 5 0 358 6 0 494 4 875 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 0 0 39 0 0 46 0 3,491 35 0 3,781 57 7,449 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 99% 1% 0% 99% 1%
APP/DEPART 39 / 57 46 / 35 3,526 / 3,530 3,838 / 3,827 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 0 21 0 0 30 0 1,902 20 0 1,877 32 3,882
APPROACH % 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 99% 1% 0% 98% 2%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.656 0.750 0.917 0.951 0.950
APP/DEPART 21 / 32 30 / 20 1,922 / 1,923 1,909 / 1,907 0 S Orange Ave

NORTH LEG
Imperial Hwy WEST LEG EAST LEG Imperial Hwy

SOUTH LEG
S Orange Ave

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 1:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:30 PM 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 PM 4 1 0 0 5 3 1 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
2:15 PM 4 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
2:30 PM 3 2 0 0 5 2 2 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
2:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 12 6 0 0 18 9 6 0 0 15 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
BEGIN PEAK HR 8 3 0 0 11
4:00 PM 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 1 2 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 3 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 0 3 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
5:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 8 9 0 0 17 3 6 0 0 9 4 3 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 1
0 4 0 0 4
2:00 PM 11 3 0 0 14 8 3 0 0 11 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 2 6 0 0 8 0 4 0 0 4 1 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1

SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIANS

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Brea
S Orange Ave
Imperial Hwy
BEGIN PEAK HR 4:45 PM

ADULT PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS

U-TURNS
S Orange Ave S Orange Ave Imperial Hwy Imperial Hwy

MD PM MD
2:00 PM
PM
4:45 PM
ALL PEDS + BIKE & SCOOTER
2:00 PM
T101823
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC4283
Thu, Oct 26, 23 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 2
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: STOP N/S
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: X X 1 1 X 1 1 3 0 X 3 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 0 0 2 2 0 18 7 382 2 0 312 5 730 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 2 0 0 21 13 429 1 0 319 8 793 0 1 1 0 2
7:30 AM 0 0 1 1 0 17 14 436 0 0 352 13 834 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 3 1 0 18 30 422 0 0 424 38 936 0 1 1 0 2
8:00 AM 0 0 5 2 0 15 19 432 0 0 436 45 954 0 0 1 0 1
8:15 AM 0 0 2 4 0 18 12 449 0 0 382 5 872 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 2 1 0 31 15 481 2 0 373 8 913 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 1 5 0 27 8 399 1 0 389 7 837 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 0 0 18 16 0 165 118 3,430 6 0 2,987 129 6,874 0 2 3 0 5 APPROACH % 0% 0% 100% 9% 0% 90% 3% 96% 0% 0% 96% 4%
APP/DEPART 18 / 249 183 / 6 3,557 / 3,464 3,116 / 3,155 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 0 12 8 0 82 76 1,784 2 0 1,615 96 3,678
APPROACH % 0% 0% 100% 9% 0% 90% 4% 96% 0% 0% 94% 6%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.600 0.711 0.936 0.889 0.963
APP/DEPART 12 / 173 91 / 2 1,864 / 1,804 1,711 / 1,699 0 09:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 18 10 358 0 0 305 5 697 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 12 8 328 0 0 317 3 669 0 0 0 0 0
10:15 AM 0 0 0 5 0 15 11 333 0 0 297 14 675 0 0 0 0 0
10:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 10 10 341 4 0 299 7 672 0 0 0 0 0
10:45 AM 0 0 1 2 0 19 7 358 2 0 309 5 703 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 0 0 1 2 0 9 12 366 0 0 315 4 709 0 0 0 0 0
11:15 AM 0 0 1 1 0 13 11 335 0 0 315 8 684 0 0 2 0 2
11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 22 14 384 1 0 344 6 771 0 0 0 0 0
11:45 AM 0 0 2 4 0 21 8 367 0 0 359 1 762 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 0 0 7 15 0 139 91 3,170 7 0 2,860 53 6,344 0 0 2 0 2 APPROACH % 0% 0% 100% 10% 0% 90% 3% 97% 0% 0% 98% 2%
APP/DEPART 7 / 144 154 / 7 3,270 / 3,192 2,913 / 3,001 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 0 4 7 0 65 45 1,452 1 0 1,333 19 2,928
APPROACH % 0% 0% 100% 10% 0% 90% 3% 97% 0% 0% 99% 1%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.500 0.720 0.940 0.939 0.949
APP/DEPART 4 / 64 72 / 1 1,500 / 1,463 1,352 / 1,400 0
S Flower Ave

NORTH LEG
Imperial Hwy WEST LEG EAST LEG Imperial Hwy

SOUTH LEG
S Flower Ave

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 7:00 AM 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 4 1 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1
7:30 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 4 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
8:00 AM 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 13 3 0 0 16 5 2 0 0 7 4 1 0 0 5 4 0 0 0 4
9:45 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:15 AM 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
10:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
11:15 AM 3 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:45 AM 4 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 11 2 0 0 13 8 1 0 0 9 3 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 6 0 0 0 6 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
11:00 9 0 0 0 9 7 0 0 0 7 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Queue WB AM

U-TURNS
S Flower Ave S Flower Ave Imperial Hwy Imperial Hwy

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Brea
S Flower Ave
Imperial Hwy

BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIANS

AM MD AM
7:45 AM
MD
11:00 AM
ALL PED + BIKE & SCOOTER ADULT PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
T101823
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC4283
Thu, Oct 26, 23 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 2
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: STOP N/S
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: X X 1 1 X 1 1 3 0 X 3 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 PM 0 0 1 2 0 14 12 341 1 0 406 10 787 0 0 3 0 3
1:15 PM 0 0 0 2 0 8 15 351 2 0 370 7 755 0 0 1 0 1
1:30 PM 0 0 1 0 0 7 18 365 0 0 416 4 811 0 0 0 0 0
1:45 PM 0 0 1 2 0 15 13 380 0 0 367 13 791 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 PM 0 0 1 1 0 8 12 388 1 0 398 15 824 0 0 4 0 4
2:15 PM 0 0 0 4 0 15 12 405 1 0 411 8 856 0 0 1 0 1
2:30 PM 0 0 1 1 0 19 11 420 0 0 378 7 837 0 0 0 0 0
2:45 PM 0 0 2 3 0 15 8 397 1 0 441 9 876 0 0 1 0 1
VOLUMES 0 0 7 15 0 101 101 3,047 6 0 3,187 73 6,547 0 0 10 0 10 APPROACH % 0% 0% 100% 13% 0% 87% 3% 96% 0% 0% 98% 2%
APP/DEPART 7 / 174 116 / 6 3,164 / 3,069 3,260 / 3,298 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 0 4 9 0 57 43 1,610 3 0 1,628 39 3,399
APPROACH % 0% 0% 100% 14% 0% 86% 3% 97% 0% 0% 98% 2%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.500 0.825 0.964 0.926 0.969
APP/DEPART 4 / 82 66 / 3 1,662 / 1,623 1,667 / 1,691 0
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 13 10 389 3 0 457 3 875 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 0 0 1 1 0 10 7 400 4 0 463 9 895 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 17 8 399 2 0 472 5 904 0 0 1 0 1
4:45 PM 0 0 2 1 0 20 9 444 2 0 416 2 896 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 23 11 465 4 0 479 7 990 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 19 17 482 4 0 472 11 1,006 0 1 0 0 1
5:30 PM 0 0 2 0 0 11 18 455 4 0 471 5 966 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 14 16 377 1 0 484 8 901 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 0 0 5 6 0 127 96 3,411 24 0 3,714 50 7,435 0 1 1 0 2 APPROACH % 0% 0% 100% 4% 0% 95% 3% 97% 1% 0% 99% 1%
APP/DEPART 5 / 147 134 / 24 3,532 / 3,422 3,764 / 3,842 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 0 2 3 0 67 62 1,779 13 0 1,906 31 3,864
APPROACH % 0% 0% 100% 4% 0% 94% 3% 96% 1% 0% 98% 2%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.250 0.740 0.921 0.984 0.959
APP/DEPART 2 / 94 71 / 13 1,854 / 1,784 1,937 / 1,973 0 S Flower Ave

NORTH LEG
Imperial Hwy WEST LEG EAST LEG Imperial Hwy

SOUTH LEG
S Flower Ave

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 1:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:30 PM 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 PM 4 1 0 0 5 3 1 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
2:15 PM 7 0 0 0 7 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4
2:30 PM 4 1 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1
2:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 16 4 0 0 20 10 3 0 0 13 2 0 0 0 2 4 1 0 0 5
BEGIN PEAK HR 9 1 0 0 10
4:00 PM 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 1 4 0 0 5 0 3 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 1 3 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 7 10 0 0 17 3 5 0 0 8 4 5 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 0 0 2
2:00 PM 15 2 0 0 17 9 1 0 0 10 2 0 0 0 2 4 1 0 0 5
5:00 PM 3 3 0 0 6 1 1 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0

MD PM MD
2:00 PM
PM
5:00 PM
ALL PEDS + BIKE & SCOOTER
2:00 PM
BEGIN PEAK HR 5:00 PM

ADULT PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS

U-TURNS
S Flower Ave
Queue WB PM
S Flower Ave Imperial Hwy Imperial Hwy

SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIANS

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Brea
S Flower Ave
Imperial Hwy
T101823
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC4283
Thu, Oct 26, 23 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 1
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: STOP N/S
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 385 2 1 308 0 702 0 0 0 2 2
7:15 AM 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 403 3 7 328 1 748 0 0 0 2 2
7:30 AM 1 0 6 1 0 3 1 450 3 5 371 0 841 0 0 0 1 1
7:45 AM 0 0 5 2 1 10 2 409 6 12 540 3 990 0 0 2 1 3
8:00 AM 0 0 3 1 0 8 3 447 4 10 392 0 868 0 0 0 2 2
8:15 AM 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 450 1 8 382 0 847 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 476 1 5 382 0 868 0 0 0 2 2
8:45 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 393 3 2 395 0 795 0 0 2 0 2
VOLUMES 2 0 34 4 1 21 9 3,413 23 50 3,098 4 6,673 0 0 4 10 14 APPROACH % 6% 0% 94% 15% 4% 81% 0% 99% 1% 2% 98% 0%
APP/DEPART 36 / 13 26 / 74 3,449 / 3,461 3,162 / 3,125 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 0 17 3 1 18 6 1,782 12 35 1,696 3 3,580
APPROACH % 0% 0% 100% 14% 5% 82% 0% 99% 1% 2% 98% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.708 0.423 0.942 0.782 0.901
APP/DEPART 17 / 9 22 / 48 1,802 / 1,807 1,739 / 1,716 0 09:45 AM 1 0 5 0 0 2 5 333 3 2 302 1 654 0 0 0 2 2
10:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 325 2 8 308 1 647 0 0 1 0 1
10:15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 342 6 3 306 1 661 0 0 1 2 3
10:30 AM 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 348 5 5 354 0 716 0 0 1 1 2
10:45 AM 1 0 2 1 0 4 3 367 2 3 281 0 664 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 358 3 6 339 0 710 0 0 1 0 1
11:15 AM 1 0 4 1 0 1 4 344 2 3 343 0 703 0 0 0 1 1
11:30 AM 1 0 1 1 0 4 1 376 2 6 355 0 747 0 0 1 2 3
11:45 AM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 365 3 6 308 3 687 0 0 0 4 4
VOLUMES 4 0 20 4 0 15 16 3,158 28 42 2,896 6 6,206 0 0 5 12 17 APPROACH % 17% 0% 83% 21% 0% 79% 0% 98% 1% 1% 98% 0%
APP/DEPART 24 / 22 19 / 70 3,207 / 3,194 2,956 / 2,920 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 2 0 8 3 0 5 7 1,443 10 21 1,345 3 2,856
APPROACH % 20% 0% 80% 38% 0% 63% 0% 99% 1% 2% 98% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.500 0.400 0.962 0.948 0.952
APP/DEPART 10 / 10 8 / 31 1,462 / 1,461 1,376 / 1,354 0 Sycamore Ave

NORTH LEG
Imperial Hwy WEST LEG EAST LEG Imperial Hwy

SOUTH LEG
Sycamore Ave

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 7:00 AM 3 1 0 0 4 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
7:15 AM 3 2 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 3 1 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 3 3 0 0 6 2 2 0 0 4 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 12 7 0 0 19 4 5 0 0 9 4 2 0 0 6 4 0 0 0 4
9:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:00 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
10:15 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
10:30 AM 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:00 AM 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
11:15 AM 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:30 AM 4 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11:45 AM 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 9 5 0 0 14 8 3 0 0 11 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 3 1 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3
11:00 AM 7 3 0 0 10 7 2 0 0 9 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

U-TURNS
Sycamore Ave Sycamore Ave Imperial Hwy Imperial Hwy

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Brea
Sycamore Ave
Imperial Hwy

BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIANS

AM MD AM
7:45 AM
MD
11:00 AM
ALL PED + BIKE & SCOOTER ADULT PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
T101823
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC4283
Thu, Oct 26, 23 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 1
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: STOP N/S
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0
1:00 PM 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 328 2 10 411 0 757 0 0 0 2 2
1:15 PM 0 0 4 0 0 0 3 352 4 9 380 0 752 0 0 0 2 2
1:30 PM 1 0 2 1 0 2 2 367 1 10 400 0 786 0 0 0 0 0
1:45 PM 1 0 3 0 0 1 3 377 3 2 397 0 787 0 0 1 1 2
2:00 PM 0 0 3 0 0 8 6 394 3 6 414 0 834 0 0 2 2 4
2:15 PM 0 0 0 3 0 15 1 424 6 5 418 0 872 0 0 0 0 0
2:30 PM 1 0 8 1 0 4 2 414 2 4 392 1 829 0 0 0 0 0
2:45 PM 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 362 3 8 415 0 793 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 3 0 26 5 0 32 20 3,018 24 54 3,227 1 6,420 0 0 3 7 10 APPROACH % 10% 0% 90% 14% 0% 86% 1% 98% 1% 2% 98% 0%
APP/DEPART 29 / 21 37 / 78 3,065 / 3,056 3,289 / 3,265 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 1 0 13 4 0 28 11 1,594 14 23 1,639 1 3,332
APPROACH % 7% 0% 93% 13% 0% 88% 1% 98% 1% 1% 98% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.389 0.444 0.940 0.984 0.955
APP/DEPART 14 / 12 32 / 37 1,621 / 1,613 1,665 / 1,670 0 4:00 PM 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 411 1 6 491 0 913 0 0 1 2 3
4:15 PM 1 0 4 1 0 0 7 390 3 9 446 0 861 0 0 0 4 4
4:30 PM 0 0 11 1 0 0 3 417 10 11 437 0 890 0 0 0 1 1
4:45 PM 0 0 2 0 0 2 4 468 2 8 472 0 958 0 0 0 2 2
5:00 PM 0 0 5 0 0 1 7 478 2 8 523 1 1,025 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 2 0 2 0 0 4 3 487 9 10 458 1 976 0 0 0 2 2
5:30 PM 1 0 5 0 0 3 4 442 1 4 522 0 982 0 0 0 3 3
5:45 PM 0 0 5 0 0 1 2 336 2 6 499 0 851 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 4 0 36 3 0 12 30 3,429 30 62 3,848 2 7,471 0 0 1 14 15 APPROACH % 10% 0% 90% 20% 0% 80% 1% 98% 1% 2% 98% 0%
APP/DEPART 40 / 32 15 / 92 3,490 / 3,482 3,926 / 3,865 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 3 0 14 0 0 10 18 1,875 14 30 1,975 2 3,948
APPROACH % 18% 0% 82% 0% 0% 100% 1% 98% 1% 1% 98% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.708 0.625 0.955 0.946 0.963
APP/DEPART 17 / 20 10 / 44 1,907 / 1,896 2,014 / 1,988 0 Sycamore Ave

NORTH LEG
Imperial Hwy WEST LEG EAST LEG Imperial Hwy

SOUTH LEG
Sycamore Ave

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 1:00 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:30 PM 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1:45 PM 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:00 PM 2 3 1 0 6 1 2 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
2:15 PM 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
2:30 PM 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 9 7 1 0 17 7 6 0 0 13 2 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
BEGIN PEAK HR 4 2 0 0 6
4:00 PM 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 3 2 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 3 2 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 2
5:15 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 4 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 15 7 0 0 22 4 1 0 0 5 9 6 0 0 15 2 0 0 0 2
0 0 0 0 0
2:00 PM 6 3 1 0 10 4 2 0 0 6 2 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 6 3 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 7 2 0 0 0 2

MD PM MD
2:00 PM
PM
4:45 PM
ALL PEDS + BIKE & SCOOTER
2:00 PM
BEGIN PEAK HR 4:45 PM

ADULT PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS

U-TURNS
Sycamore Ave DWY Imperial Hwy Imperial Hwy

SCHOOL AGE PEDESTRIANS

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Brea
Sycamore Ave
Imperial Hwy
City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 40 of 50 ends

Appendix C
Intersection Level of Service Worksheets (Existing)

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
1: S Brea Boulevard & W Birch St/E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 7-9 AM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 23 62 23 281 79 301 23 434 191 373 774 52 Future Volume (vph) 23 62 23 281 79 301 23 434 191 373 774 52 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 215 0 250 0 225 0 280 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 2 1 1 0 2 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.91 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.98 0.99 1.00
Frt 0.959 0.850 0.954 0.991
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1773 0 3433 1863 1583 1770 4804 0 3433 5029 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1773 0 3433 1863 1554 1770 4804 0 3433 5029 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 14 334 84 9
Link Speed (mph) 25 35 35 35
Link Distance (ft) 1165 380 688 613
Travel Time (s) 31.8 7.4 13.4 11.9
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 14 6 10 3
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 44
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 26 69 26 312 88 334 26 482 212 414 860 58 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 95 0 312 88 334 26 694 0 414 918 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
1: S Brea Boulevard & W Birch St/E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 7-9 AM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 2
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 8
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 5 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 8.0 6.0 8.0 6.0 6.0 8.0 15.0 8.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.5 37.6 12.5 39.9 39.9 12.5 29.9 12.5 27.9 Total Split (s) 18.0 38.0 21.0 41.0 41.0 18.0 42.0 29.0 53.0 Total Split (%) 13.8% 29.2% 16.2% 31.5% 31.5% 13.8% 32.3% 22.3% 40.8% Maximum Green (s) 13.5 33.4 16.5 36.1 36.1 13.5 35.1 24.5 46.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.6 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.5 3.0 1.5 3.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.9 4.9 4.5 6.9 4.5 6.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Max None C-Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Don't Walk (s) 26.0 28.0 28.0 16.0 14.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 7 3 3 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 8.2 14.0 15.0 25.6 25.6 11.3 60.6 19.9 74.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.11 0.12 0.20 0.20 0.09 0.47 0.15 0.57 v/c Ratio 0.24 0.47 0.79 0.24 0.58 0.17 0.30 0.79 0.32
Control Delay (s/veh) 63.3 51.0 70.5 44.4 8.2 94.1 49.4 64.2 18.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 63.3 51.0 70.5 44.4 8.2 94.1 49.4 64.2 18.2

LOS E D E D A F D E B
Approach Delay (s/veh) 53.6 39.0 51.0 32.5
Approach LOS D D D C
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 71 (55%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 95
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.79
Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 39.6 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 1: S Brea Boulevard & W Birch St/E Birch St HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing
1: S Brea Boulevard & W Birch St/E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 7-9 AM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 23 62 23 281 79 301 23 434 191 373 774 52 Future Volume (veh/h) 23 62 23 281 79 301 23 434 191 373 774 52 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 26 69 14 312 88 65 26 482 166 414 860 55 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 67 153 31 365 319 267 461 1867 619 473 1736 111 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.17 0.17 0.52 0.99 0.99 0.14 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1497 304 3456 1870 1568 1781 3771 1249 3456 4896 312 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 26 0 83 312 88 65 26 433 215 414 597 318 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1800 1728 1870 1568 1781 1702 1616 1728 1702 1803 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 0.0 5.6 11.5 5.3 4.7 0.9 0.2 0.2 15.3 17.8 18.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 0.0 5.6 11.5 5.3 4.7 0.9 0.2 0.2 15.3 17.8 18.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 1.00 0.17
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 67 0 184 365 319 267 461 1685 800 473 1207 640 V/C Ratio(X) 0.39 0.00 0.45 0.85 0.28 0.24 0.06 0.26 0.27 0.88 0.49 0.50 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 185 0 463 439 519 436 461 1685 800 651 1207 640 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 61.1 0.0 54.9 57.2 46.9 46.7 23.5 0.3 0.3 55.0 32.8 32.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.4 0.0 0.6 11.6 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.8 7.7 1.5 2.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 0.0 2.6 5.6 2.5 1.8 0.4 0.1 0.2 7.1 7.5 8.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 62.5 0.0 55.5 68.7 47.1 46.8 23.5 0.7 1.1 62.7 34.3 35.6 LnGrp LOS E E E D D C A A E C D
Approach Vol, veh/h 109 465 674 1329
Approach Delay, s/veh 57.2 61.6 1.7 43.5
Approach LOS E E A D
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.3 71.3 18.2 18.2 40.6 53.0 9.4 27.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 6.9 4.5 * 4.9 6.9 * 6.9 4.5 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 24.5 35.1 16.5 * 33 13.5 * 46 13.5 36.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 17.3 2.2 13.5 7.6 2.9 20.0 3.9 7.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 2.9 0.2 0.3 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 36.4
HCM 7th LOS D
Notes
* HCM 7th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
2: S Orange Ave & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 7-9 AM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 4
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1 585 45 22 643 8 19 1 21 0 0 12
Future Volume (vph) 1 585 45 22 643 8 19 1 21 0 0 12
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 80 130 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.850 0.998 0.931 0.865
Flt Protected 0.950 0.977
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 1770 3532 0 0 1694000 1611 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.977
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 1770 3532 0 0 1694000 1611 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 380 364 668 208
Travel Time (s) 7.4 7.1 18.2 5.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 1 609 47 23 670 8 20 1 22 0 0 13
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 610 47 23 678 0 0 43 0 0 0 13
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 7th TWSC Existing
2: S Orange Ave & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 7-9 AM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 585 45 22 643 8 19 1 21 0 0 12
Future Vol, veh/h 1 585 45 22 643 8 19 1 21 0 0 12
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 10 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 80 130 - - - - - - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 609 47 23 670 8 20 1 22 0 0 13
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 683 0 0 666 0 0 1002 1350 315 - - 344 Stage 1 - - - - - - 621 621 - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 381 729 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 - - 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 - - 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 906 - - 919 - - 197 149 681 0 0 652
Stage 1 - - - - - - 441 477 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 613 426 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 902 - - 910 - - 186 143 675 - - 649
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 186 143 - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 436 472 - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 586 414 - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0.01 0.3 19.41 10.66

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 292 902 - - 910 - - 649
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.146 0.001 - - 0.025 - - 0.019
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 19.4 9 - - 9.1 - - 10.7
HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.1
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
3: S Flower Ave & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 7-9 AM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 6
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 19 570 22 99 566 14 90 51 37 33 7 19 Future Volume (vph) 19 570 22 99 566 14 90 51 37 33 7 19 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 120 0 185 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00
Frt 0.995 0.996 0.972 0.957
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.975 0.972
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3517 0 1770 3522 0 0 1742 0 0 1726 0 Flt Permitted 0.415 0.408 0.826 0.811
Satd. Flow (perm) 773 3517 0 760 3522 0 0 1476 0 0 1440 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 7 4 30 19
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 364 329 750 397
Travel Time (s) 7.1 6.4 20.5 10.8
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 13 5 85 1
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 19 582 22 101 578 14 92 52 38 34 7 19
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 19 604 0 101 592 0 0 182 0 0 60 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
3: S Flower Ave & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 7-9 AM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 7
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 2 6 8 4
Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4
Detector Phase 2 2 6 6 8 8 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Minimum Split (s) 26.9 26.9 26.9 26.9 35.6 35.6 35.6 35.6 Total Split (s) 26.9 26.9 26.9 26.9 35.6 35.6 35.6 35.6 Total Split (%) 43.0% 43.0% 43.0% 43.0% 57.0% 57.0% 57.0% 57.0% Maximum Green (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.6 4.6
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Recall Mode Max Max Max Max None None None None
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Don't Walk (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 6 6 2 2 50 50 1 1
Act Effct Green (s) 28.5 28.5 28.5 28.5 19.2 19.1
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.36 0.35
v/c Ratio 0.05 0.32 0.25 0.32 0.33 0.12
Control Delay (s/veh) 14.2 13.0 16.8 13.1 10.0 6.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 14.2 13.0 16.8 13.1 10.0 6.8

LOS B B B B B A
Approach Delay (s/veh) 13.1 13.6 10.0 6.8
Approach LOS B B B A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 62.5
Actuated Cycle Length: 53.9
Natural Cycle: 65
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.33
Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 12.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: S Flower Ave & E Birch St
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing
3: S Flower Ave & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 7-9 AM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 19 570 22 99 566 14 90 51 37 33 7 19 Future Volume (veh/h) 19 570 22 99 566 14 90 51 37 33 7 19 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.92 0.94 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 19 582 19 101 578 13 92 52 25 34 7 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 433 1588 52 427 1606 36 378 202 81 463 96 74 Arrive On Green 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow, veh/h 824 3510 114 814 3550 80 749 573 230 956 272 210 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 19 294 307 101 289 302 169 0 0 48 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 824 1777 1848 814 1777 1853 1551 0 0 1437 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 5.3 5.3 4.5 5.2 5.2 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.9 5.3 5.3 9.8 5.2 5.2 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.04 0.54 0.15 0.71 0.15
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 433 804 836 427 804 838 661 0 0 633 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.04 0.37 0.37 0.24 0.36 0.36 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 433 804 836 427 804 838 1096 0 0 1019 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 10.7 8.7 8.7 12.0 8.7 8.7 11.3 0.0 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 1.8 1.9 0.8 1.8 1.8 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 10.8 10.0 10.0 13.3 10.0 9.9 11.4 0.0 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B B A B A A B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 620 692 169 48
Approach Delay, s/veh 10.0 10.4 11.4 10.5
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.9 21.7 26.9 21.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 4.6 4.9 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 31.0 22.0 31.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.9 2.9 11.8 5.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 0.1 1.2 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 10.4
HCM 7th LOS B
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
4: Alley & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 7-9 AM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 9
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 2 620 17 35 674 3 5 0 2 2 0 1
Future Volume (vph) 2 620 17 35 674 3 5 0 2 2 0 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 40 0 140 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.996 0.999 0.966 0.955
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.964 0.968
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3525 0 1770 3536 0 0 1735 0 0 1722 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.964 0.968
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3525 0 1770 3536 0 0 1735 0 0 1722 0 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 329 815 991 416
Travel Time (s) 6.4 15.9 27.0 11.3
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 26 12
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Adj. Flow (vph) 2 756 21 43 822 4 6 0 2 2 0 1
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 777 0 43 826 0 0 8 0030
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 7th TWSC Existing
4: Alley & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 7-9 AM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 10
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 620 17 35 674 3 5 0 2 2 0 1
Future Vol, veh/h 2 620 17 35 674 3 5 0 2 2 0 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 26 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 40 - - 140 --------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 2 756 21 43 822 4 6 0 2 2 0 1
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 838 0 0 803 0 0 1294 1720 414 1304 1729 425 Stage 1 - - - - - - 797 797 - 921 921 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 496 923 - 383 808 -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 792 - - 817 - - 120 89 587 118 87 578 Stage 1 - - - - - - 346 397 - 291 347 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 524 347 - 612 392 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 783 - - 796 - - 110 81 572 109 80 571 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 110 81 - 109 80 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 336 386 - 272 325 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 495 324 - 607 381 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0.03 0.48 31.73 29.62

HCM LOS D D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 143 783 - - 796 - - 150
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.06 0.003 - - 0.054 - - 0.024
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 31.7 9.6 - - 9.8 - - 29.6
HCM Lane LOS D A - - A - - D
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0.2 - - 0.1
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
5: S Brea Boulevard & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 7-9 AM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 11
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 129 1461 394 181 1428 92 415 441 172 216 713 148 Future Volume (vph) 129 1461 394 181 1428 92 415 441 172 216 713 148 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 225 160 230 185 355 180 245 0
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.98 0.97 0.97
Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1545 3433 5085 1556 3433 5085 1536 3433 3539 1542 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 231 97 205 165
Link Speed (mph) 40 40 35 35
Link Distance (ft) 615 385 495 688
Travel Time (s) 10.5 6.6 9.6 13.4
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 11 5 14 8
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 5 7
Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 154 1739 469 215 1700 110 494 525 205 257 849 176 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 154 1739 469 215 1700 110 494 525 205 257 849 176 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
5: S Brea Boulevard & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4
Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4
Detector Phase 5 2 2 1 6 6 3 8 8 7 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 15.0 15.0 7.0 15.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.6 42.3 42.3 11.6 42.3 42.3 14.6 41.6 41.6 15.3 39.6 39.6 Total Split (s) 15.6 50.5 50.5 17.6 52.5 52.5 21.6 42.6 42.6 19.3 39.6 39.6 Total Split (%) 12.0% 38.8% 38.8% 13.5% 40.4% 40.4% 16.6% 32.8% 32.8% 14.8% 30.5% 30.5% Maximum Green (s) 11.0 45.2 45.2 13.0 47.2 47.2 17.0 38.0 38.0 14.0 35.0 35.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.6 4.3 4.3 3.6 4.3 4.3 3.6 3.6 3.6 4.3 3.6 3.6 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.6 5.3 5.3 4.6 5.3 5.3 4.6 4.6 4.6 5.3 4.6 4.6 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min Min C-Min C-Min None None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Don't Walk (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 28.0 28.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 5 5 2 2 7 7 4 4
Act Effct Green (s) 10.4 47.3 47.3 12.1 49.0 49.0 17.0 37.8 37.8 12.9 34.4 34.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.36 0.36 0.09 0.38 0.38 0.13 0.29 0.29 0.10 0.26 0.26 v/c Ratio 0.56 0.94 0.66 0.67 0.89 0.17 1.10 0.35 0.35 0.76 0.91 0.33 Control Delay (s/veh) 65.7 51.2 22.3 67.7 44.8 7.4 124.7 37.4 6.3 64.0 62.3 16.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 65.7 51.2 22.3 67.7 44.8 7.4 124.7 37.4 6.3 64.0 62.3 16.2

LOS E D C E D A F D A E E B
Approach Delay (s/veh) 46.4 45.2 67.4 56.3
Approach LOS D D E E
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 39 (30%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 125
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.10
Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 51.6 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 5: S Brea Boulevard & Imperial Highway HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing
5: S Brea Boulevard & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 7-9 AM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 13
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 129 1461 394 181 1428 92 415 441 172 216 713 148 Future Volume (veh/h) 129 1461 394 181 1428 92 415 441 172 216 713 148 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 154 1739 323 215 1700 50 494 525 62 257 849 56 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 265 1775 539 365 1951 603 452 1529 461 309 937 407 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.35 0.35 0.11 0.38 0.38 0.13 0.30 0.30 0.09 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 5106 1550 3456 5106 1579 3456 5106 1539 3456 3554 1543 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 154 1739 323 215 1700 50 494 525 62 257 849 56 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1702 1550 1728 1702 1579 1728 1702 1539 1728 1777 1543 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.6 43.8 15.2 7.7 40.1 2.6 17.0 10.4 2.8 9.5 30.0 3.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.6 43.8 15.2 7.7 40.1 2.6 17.0 10.4 2.8 9.5 30.0 3.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 265 1775 539 365 1951 603 452 1529 461 309 937 407 V/C Ratio(X) 0.58 0.98 0.60 0.59 0.87 0.08 1.09 0.34 0.13 0.83 0.91 0.14 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 292 1775 539 365 1951 603 452 1529 461 372 957 415 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 58.0 41.9 16.3 55.5 37.2 25.6 56.5 35.5 18.2 58.2 46.3 36.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.2 17.0 4.9 1.7 5.7 0.3 69.9 0.3 0.3 9.8 11.5 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.5 20.5 6.0 3.4 17.2 1.0 11.7 4.4 1.4 4.6 14.6 1.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 59.2 59.0 21.1 57.2 42.9 25.9 126.4 35.8 18.5 68.0 57.8 36.9 LnGrp LOS E E C E D C F D B E E D
Approach Vol, veh/h 2216 1965 1081 1162
Approach Delay, s/veh 53.5 44.0 76.2 59.1
Approach LOS D D E E
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.0 50.5 21.6 38.9 14.6 55.0 16.9 43.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.3 * 5.3 4.6 4.6 4.6 5.3 5.3 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.0 * 45 17.0 35.0 11.0 47.2 14.0 38.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.7 45.8 19.0 32.0 7.6 42.1 11.5 12.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.1 4.7 0.1 7.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 55.4
HCM 7th LOS E
Notes
* HCM 7th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
6: S Orange Ave & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 7-9 AM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 14
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1860 6 0 1677 28 0 0 17 0 0 37
Future Volume (vph) 0 1860 6 0 1677 28 0 0 17 0 0 37
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.998 0.865 0.865
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5085 0 0 5075 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5085 0 0 5075 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611
Link Speed (mph) 40 40 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 385 366 1313 668
Travel Time (s) 6.6 6.2 35.8 18.2
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 12
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 2268 7 0 2045 34 0 0 21 0 0 45
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 2275 0 0 2079 0 0 0 21 0 0 45
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 7th TWSC Existing
6: S Orange Ave & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 7-9 AM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 15
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1860 6 0 1677 28 0 0 17 0 0 37
Future Vol, veh/h 0 1860 6 0 1677 28 0 0 17 0 0 37
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 2 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - -0 - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 2268 7 0 2045 34 0 0 21 0 0 45
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 - - 0 - - 1140 - - 1052
Stage 1 - -----------
Stage 2 - -----------
Critical Hdwy - - - - - - - - 7.14 - - 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - - - - 3.92 - - 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 - - 0 0 167 0 0 192
Stage 1 0 - - 0 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - - - - 167 - - 189
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----------
Stage 1 - -----------
Stage 2 - -----------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 29.61 29.85

HCM LOS D D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 167 - - - - 189
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.124 - - - - 0.238
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 29.6 - - - - 29.9
HCM Lane LOS D - - - -D
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - - - - 0.9
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
7: S Flower Ave & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 7-9 AM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 16
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 86 1784 2 0 1622 101 0 0 12 14 0 84 Future Volume (vph) 86 1784 2 0 1622 101 0 0 12 14 0 84 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 130 0 0 0 0 0 0 100
Storage Lanes 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.991 0.865 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 0 0 5040 0 0 0 1611 1770 0 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 0 0 5040 0 0 0 1611 1770 0 1583 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 366 681 1312 750
Travel Time (s) 6.2 11.6 35.8 20.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6
Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 102 2124 2 0 1931 120 0 0 14 17 0 100
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 102 2126 0 0 2051 0 0 0 14 17 0 100 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 7th TWSC Existing
7: S Flower Ave & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 7-9 AM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 17
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 37.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 86 1784 2 0 1622 101 0 0 12 14 0 84
Future Vol, veh/h 86 1784 2 0 1622 101 0 0 12 14 0 84
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 130 - - - - - - - 0 0 - 100
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 102 2124 2 0 1931 120 0 0 14 17 0 100
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 2057 0 0 - - 0 - - 1063 3051 - 1032 Stage 1 - -------- 1997 - -
Stage 2 - -------- 1054 - -
Critical Hdwy 5.34 - - - - - - - 7.14 6.44 - 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - - - 7.34 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - - - 6.74 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 - - - - - - - 3.92 3.82 - 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 117 - - 0 - - 0 0 188 ~ 14 0 198
Stage 1 - - - 0 - - 0 0 - 39 0 -
Stage 2 - - - 0 - - 0 0 - 218 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 116 - - - - - - - 188 ~ 1 - 196
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - - - ~ 1 - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - - - 38 - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - - - 24 - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 5.65 0 25.69 $ 1308.45

HCM LOS D F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 188 116 - - - - 1 196
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.076 0.88 - - - - 11.219 0.509
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 25.7 123 - - - -$ 8913.6 40.9 HCM Lane LOS D F - - - -FE
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 5.4 - - - - 3.6 2.6
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
8: Sycamore Ave/Alley & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 7-9 AM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 18
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 6 1788 12 35 1708 3 0 0 17 3 1 18
Future Volume (vph) 6 1788 12 35 1708 3 0 0 17 3 1 18
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 75 0 120 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.999 0.865 0.887
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.994
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5080 0 1770 5085 0 0 1611 0 0 1642 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.994
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5080 0 1770 5085 0 0 1611 0 0 1642 0 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 681 517 606 991
Travel Time (s) 11.6 8.8 16.5 27.0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 7 1943 13 38 1857 3 0 0 18 3 1 20
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 1956 0 38 1860 0 0 18 0 0 24 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 7th TWSC Existing
8: Sycamore Ave/Alley & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 7-9 AM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 19
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 1788 12 35 1708 3 0 0 17 3 1 18
Future Vol, veh/h 6 1788 12 35 1708 3 0 0 17 3 1 18
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 75 - - 120 --------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 7 1943 13 38 1857 3 0 0 18 3 1 20
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1863 0 0 1958 0 0 2783 3903 979 2728 3908 933 Stage 1 - ----- 1964 1964 - 1937 1937 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 819 1939 - 790 1971 -
Critical Hdwy 5.34 - - 5.34 - - 6.44 6.54 7.14 6.44 6.54 7.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 7.34 5.54 - 7.34 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.74 5.54 - 6.74 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 - - 3.12 - - 3.82 4.02 3.92 3.82 4.02 3.92 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 147 - - 131 - - 20 3 214 22 3 230
Stage 1 - - - - - - 41 108 - 43 111 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 304 111 - 317 107 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 146 - - 131 - - 8 2 214 14 2 229
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 8 2 - 14 2 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 39 103 - 30 79 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 195 78 - 277 102 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0.1 0.87 23.41 $ 303.8

HCM LOS C F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 214 146 - - 131 - - 29
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.086 0.045 - - 0.29 - - 0.818
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 23.4 30.7 - - 43.2 - -$ 303.8 HCM Lane LOS C D - - E - - F
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.1 - - 1.1 - - 2.7
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
1: S Brea Boulevard & W Birch St/E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 9:45-12 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 49 75 32 202 88 222 44 300 172 237 376 71 Future Volume (vph) 49 75 32 202 88 222 44 300 172 237 376 71 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 215 0 250 0 225 0 280 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 2 1 1 0 2 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.91 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.98 0.99 0.99
Frt 0.955 0.850 0.945 0.976
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1762 0 3433 1863 1583 1770 4735 0 3433 4932 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1762 0 3433 1863 1549 1770 4735 0 3433 4932 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 16 247 108 30
Link Speed (mph) 25 35 35 35
Link Distance (ft) 1165 380 688 613
Travel Time (s) 31.8 7.4 13.4 11.9
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 16 9 16 6
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 2 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 54 83 36 224 98 247 49 333 191 263 418 79 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 54 119 0 224 98 247 49 524 0 263 497 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
1: S Brea Boulevard & W Birch St/E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 9:45-12 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 2
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 8
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 5 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 8.0 6.0 8.0 6.0 6.0 8.0 15.0 8.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.5 37.6 12.5 39.9 39.9 12.5 29.9 12.5 27.9 Total Split (s) 22.0 38.0 25.0 41.0 41.0 22.0 40.0 27.0 45.0 Total Split (%) 16.9% 29.2% 19.2% 31.5% 31.5% 16.9% 30.8% 20.8% 34.6% Maximum Green (s) 17.5 33.4 20.5 36.1 36.1 17.5 33.1 22.5 38.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.6 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.5 3.0 1.5 3.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.9 4.9 4.5 6.9 4.5 6.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Max None C-Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Don't Walk (s) 26.0 28.0 28.0 16.0 14.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 8 4 4 8 2
Act Effct Green (s) 9.2 15.2 12.8 21.0 21.0 15.6 67.2 14.3 68.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.12 0.10 0.16 0.16 0.12 0.52 0.11 0.53 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.54 0.66 0.33 0.54 0.23 0.21 0.70 0.19
Control Delay (s/veh) 68.2 53.6 69.1 47.1 11.6 43.8 18.4 65.6 18.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 68.2 53.6 69.1 47.1 11.6 43.8 18.4 65.6 18.7

LOS E D E D B D B E B
Approach Delay (s/veh) 58.2 40.3 20.6 34.9
Approach LOS E D C C
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 99 (76%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 95
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.70
Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 34.4 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 1: S Brea Boulevard & W Birch St/E Birch St HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing
1: S Brea Boulevard & W Birch St/E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 9:45-12 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 49 75 32 202 88 222 44 300 172 237 376 71 Future Volume (veh/h) 49 75 32 202 88 222 44 300 172 237 376 71 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 54 83 22 224 98 40 49 333 139 263 418 65 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 94 166 44 283 276 230 585 1962 764 321 1305 198 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.12 0.12 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.66 1.00 1.00 0.09 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1405 372 3456 1870 1556 1781 3589 1398 3456 4454 674 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 54 0 105 224 98 40 49 315 157 263 317 166 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1778 1728 1870 1556 1781 1702 1583 1728 1702 1723 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.8 0.0 7.2 8.4 6.6 3.2 1.3 0.0 0.0 9.7 9.4 9.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.8 0.0 7.2 8.4 6.6 3.2 1.3 0.0 0.0 9.7 9.4 9.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.21 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.39
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 94 0 210 283 276 230 585 1861 865 321 998 505 V/C Ratio(X) 0.57 0.00 0.50 0.79 0.36 0.17 0.08 0.17 0.18 0.82 0.32 0.33 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 240 0 457 545 519 432 585 1861 865 598 998 505 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 60.1 0.0 53.7 62.1 55.9 54.2 15.2 0.0 0.0 57.9 35.8 36.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.1 0.0 0.7 1.9 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.4 2.0 0.8 1.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.0 3.3 3.9 3.2 1.3 0.5 0.0 0.1 4.3 4.0 4.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 62.2 0.0 54.4 64.0 56.1 54.4 15.3 0.2 0.4 59.9 36.7 37.7 LnGrp LOS E D E E D B A A E D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 159 362 521 746
Approach Delay, s/veh 57.0 60.8 1.7 45.1
Approach LOS E E A D
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.6 78.0 15.2 20.3 49.6 45.0 11.4 24.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 6.9 4.5 * 4.9 6.9 * 6.9 4.5 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.5 33.1 20.5 * 33 17.5 * 38 17.5 36.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.7 2.0 10.4 9.2 3.3 11.8 5.8 8.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 2.0 0.3 0.4 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 36.7
HCM 7th LOS D
Notes
* HCM 7th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
2: S Orange Ave & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 9:45-12 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 4
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 2 438 43 25 498 9 10 3 16 0 0 14
Future Volume (vph) 2 438 43 25 498 9 10 3 16 0 0 14
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 80 130 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.850 0.997 0.924 0.865
Flt Protected 0.950 0.983
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 1770 3529 0 0 1692000 1611 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.983
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 1770 3529 0 0 1692000 1611 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 380 364 668 208
Travel Time (s) 7.4 7.1 18.2 5.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 1
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Adj. Flow (vph) 2 492 48 28 560 10 11 3 18 0 0 16
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 494 48 28 570 0 0 32 0 0 0 16
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 7th TWSC Existing
2: S Orange Ave & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 9:45-12 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 438 43 25 498 9 10 3 16 0 0 14
Future Vol, veh/h 2 438 43 25 498 9 10 3 16 0 0 14
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 80 130 - - - - - - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 2 492 48 28 560 10 11 3 18 0 0 16
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 571 0 0 545 0 0 838 1128 251 - - 286 Stage 1 - - - - - - 502 502 - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 336 627 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 - - 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 - - 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 998 - - 1020 - - 259 203 749 0 0 711 Stage 1 - - - - - - 520 540 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 652 475 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 997 - - 1015 - - 245 196 745 - - 710 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 245 196 - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 516 536 - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 620 461 - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0.04 0.41 15.57 10.18

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 373 997 - - 1015 - - 710
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.087 0.002 - - 0.028 - - 0.022
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 15.6 8.6 - - 8.6 - - 10.2
HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.1
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
3: S Flower Ave & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 9:45-12 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 6
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 14 428 7 65 494 11 15 6 50 26 3 13 Future Volume (vph) 14 428 7 65 494 11 15 6 50 26 3 13
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 120 0 185 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 0.98
Frt 0.998 0.997 0.905 0.958
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.990 0.971
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3531 0 1770 3527 0 0 1641 0 0 1733 0 Flt Permitted 0.422 0.458 0.928 0.832
Satd. Flow (perm) 786 3531 0 853 3527 0 0 1538 0 0 1485 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 3 4 60 16
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 364 329 750 397
Travel Time (s) 7.1 6.4 20.5 10.8
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 19
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Adj. Flow (vph) 17 516 8 78 595 13 18 7 60 31 4 16
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 17 524 0 78 608 0 0 85 0 0 51 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
3: S Flower Ave & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 9:45-12 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 7
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 2 6 8 4
Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4
Detector Phase 2 2 6 6 8 8 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Minimum Split (s) 26.9 26.9 26.9 26.9 35.6 35.6 35.6 35.6 Total Split (s) 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (%) 44.6% 44.6% 44.6% 44.6% 55.4% 55.4% 55.4% 55.4% Maximum Green (s) 24.1 24.1 24.1 24.1 31.4 31.4 31.4 31.4 Yellow Time (s) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.6 4.6
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Recall Mode C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Don't Walk (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 1 1 1 1 0 0 9 9
Act Effct Green (s) 47.7 47.7 47.7 47.7 10.6 10.6
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.16 0.16
v/c Ratio 0.03 0.20 0.12 0.24 0.28 0.20
Control Delay (s/veh) 8.1 7.6 8.0 6.1 7.4 15.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 8.1 7.6 8.0 6.1 7.4 15.9

LOS A A A A A B
Approach Delay (s/veh) 7.6 6.3 7.4 15.9
Approach LOS A A A B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 65
Actuated Cycle Length: 65
Offset: 51 (78%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 65
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.28
Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 7.3 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: S Flower Ave & E Birch St
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing
3: S Flower Ave & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 9:45-12 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 14 428 7 65 494 11 15 6 50 26 3 13 Future Volume (veh/h) 14 428 7 65 494 11 15 6 50 26 3 13 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 17 516 8 78 595 13 18 7 12 31 4 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 674 2667 41 727 2649 58 141 57 55 220 27 13
Arrive On Green 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Sat Flow, veh/h 813 3580 55 878 3556 78 536 525 509 1093 249 115 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 17 256 268 78 297 311 37 0 0 38 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 813 1777 1859 878 1777 1856 1570 0 0 1457 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 2.8 2.8 1.9 3.3 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.8 2.8 2.8 4.7 3.3 3.3 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.04 0.49 0.32 0.82 0.08
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 674 1324 1385 727 1324 1383 253 0 0 259 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.03 0.19 0.19 0.11 0.22 0.22 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 674 1324 1385 727 1324 1383 818 0 0 779 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 3.1 2.5 2.5 3.2 2.5 2.5 26.4 0.0 0.0 26.4 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 3.2 2.8 2.8 3.5 2.9 2.9 26.5 0.0 0.0 26.5 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 541 686 37 38
Approach Delay, s/veh 2.8 3.0 26.5 26.5
Approach LOS A A C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 53.3 11.7 53.3 11.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 4.6 4.9 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 24.1 31.4 24.1 31.4
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.8 3.3 6.7 3.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.0 0.1 1.3 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 4.3
HCM 7th LOS A
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
4: Alley & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 9:45-12 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 9
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1 498 2 3 569 0 0 1 4 0 0 2
Future Volume (vph) 1 498 2 3 569 0 0 1 4 0 0 2
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 40 0 140 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.999 0.887 0.865
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3536 0 1770 3539 0 0 1652 0 0 1611 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3536 0 1770 3539 0 0 1652 0 0 1611 0 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 329 815 991 416
Travel Time (s) 6.4 15.9 27.0 11.3
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 4
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 1 586 2 4 669 0 0 1 5 0 0 2
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1 588 0 4 669 0 0 6 0020
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 25.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 7th TWSC Existing
4: Alley & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 9:45-12 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 10
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 498 2 3 569 0 0 1 4 0 0 2
Future Vol, veh/h 1 498 2 3 569 0 0 1 4 0 0 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 40 - - 140 --------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 586 2 4 669 0 0 1 5 0 0 2
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 673 0 0 589 0 0 932 1271 295 976 1272 339 Stage 1 - - - - - - 590 590 - 680 680 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 342 680 - 296 592 -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 913 - - 982 - - 221 167 701 205 166 657 Stage 1 - - - - - - 461 493 - 407 449 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 647 449 - 688 492 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 910 - - 981 - - 219 165 701 201 165 655 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 219 165 - 201 165 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 460 492 - 404 445 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 642 445 - 681 491 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0.02 0.05 13.59 10.52

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 425 910 - - 981 - - 655
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 0.001 - - 0.004 - - 0.004
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 13.6 9 - - 8.7 - - 10.5
HCM Lane LOS B A - - A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - - 0
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
5: S Brea Boulevard & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 9:45-12 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 11
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 94 1125 242 231 1060 94 297 343 217 137 334 129 Future Volume (vph) 94 1125 242 231 1060 94 297 343 217 137 334 129 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 225 160 230 185 355 180 245 0
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.98 0.98 0.98
Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1563 3433 5085 1553 3433 5085 1552 3433 3539 1553 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 174 97 233 147
Link Speed (mph) 40 40 35 35
Link Distance (ft) 615 385 495 688
Travel Time (s) 10.5 6.6 9.6 13.4
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 6 6
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 2 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 101 1210 260 248 1140 101 319 369 233 147 359 139 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 101 1210 260 248 1140 101 319 369 233 147 359 139 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
5: S Brea Boulevard & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4
Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4
Detector Phase 5 2 2 1 6 6 3 8 8 7 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 15.0 15.0 7.0 15.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.6 42.3 42.3 11.6 42.3 42.3 14.6 41.6 41.6 15.3 39.6 39.6 Total Split (s) 20.6 45.5 45.5 20.6 45.5 45.5 21.6 42.6 42.6 21.3 39.6 39.6 Total Split (%) 15.8% 35.0% 35.0% 15.8% 35.0% 35.0% 16.6% 32.8% 32.8% 16.4% 30.5% 30.5% Maximum Green (s) 16.0 40.2 40.2 16.0 40.2 40.2 17.0 38.0 38.0 16.0 35.0 35.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.6 4.3 4.3 3.6 4.3 4.3 3.6 3.6 3.6 4.3 3.6 3.6 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.6 5.3 5.3 4.6 5.3 5.3 4.6 4.6 4.6 5.3 4.6 4.6 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min Min C-Min C-Min None None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Don't Walk (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 28.0 28.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 4 4 3 3 3 3
Act Effct Green (s) 10.2 58.9 58.9 14.3 63.1 63.1 15.4 26.1 26.1 10.8 22.3 22.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.45 0.45 0.11 0.49 0.49 0.12 0.20 0.20 0.08 0.17 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.53 0.32 0.66 0.46 0.13 0.79 0.36 0.47 0.51 0.59 0.36 Control Delay (s/veh) 61.1 28.1 10.3 64.2 24.3 5.5 70.0 44.6 7.8 53.4 61.8 24.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 61.1 28.1 10.3 64.2 24.3 5.5 70.0 44.6 7.8 53.4 61.8 24.4

LOS E C B E C A E D A D E C
Approach Delay (s/veh) 27.3 29.7 44.1 51.8
Approach LOS C C D D
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 59 (45%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 115
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.79
Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 34.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 5: S Brea Boulevard & Imperial Highway HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing
5: S Brea Boulevard & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 9:45-12 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 13
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 94 1125 242 231 1060 94 297 343 217 137 334 129 Future Volume (veh/h) 94 1125 242 231 1060 94 297 343 217 137 334 129 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 101 1210 164 248 1140 52 319 369 48 147 359 25 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 259 1500 460 1012 2640 816 372 915 277 265 545 237 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.52 0.52 0.11 0.18 0.18 0.10 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 5106 1565 3456 5106 1579 3456 5106 1547 3456 3554 1546 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 101 1210 164 248 1140 52 319 369 48 147 359 25 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1702 1565 1728 1702 1579 1728 1702 1547 1728 1777 1546 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.6 28.5 8.0 7.1 18.0 2.1 11.8 8.3 1.9 5.3 12.1 1.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.6 28.5 8.0 7.1 18.0 2.1 11.8 8.3 1.9 5.3 12.1 1.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 259 1500 460 1012 2640 816 372 915 277 265 545 237 V/C Ratio(X) 0.39 0.81 0.36 0.25 0.43 0.06 0.86 0.40 0.17 0.56 0.66 0.11 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 425 1579 484 1012 2640 816 452 1493 452 425 957 416 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 57.3 42.5 19.8 35.0 19.5 15.7 57.0 47.2 13.7 56.3 48.6 44.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 4.8 2.2 0.0 0.5 0.2 11.3 0.6 0.6 0.6 2.7 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.6 12.4 3.2 3.0 7.0 0.8 5.7 3.6 1.3 2.3 5.3 0.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 57.7 47.3 22.0 35.1 20.0 15.8 68.3 47.8 14.3 56.9 51.4 44.9 LnGrp LOS E D C D C B E D B E D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1475 1440 736 531
Approach Delay, s/veh 45.2 22.5 54.5 52.6
Approach LOS D C D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 43.4 43.5 18.6 24.5 14.3 72.5 15.3 27.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.3 * 5.3 4.6 4.6 4.6 5.3 5.3 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 * 40 17.0 35.0 16.0 40.2 16.0 38.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.1 30.5 13.8 14.1 5.6 20.0 7.3 10.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 7.7 0.2 4.1 0.1 12.7 0.1 5.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 39.9
HCM 7th LOS D
Notes
* HCM 7th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
6: S Orange Ave & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 9:45-12 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 14
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1482 7 0 1380 21 0 0 23 0 0 23
Future Volume (vph) 0 1482 7 0 1380 21 0 0 23 0 0 23
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.999 0.998 0.865 0.865
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5080 0 0 5075 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5080 0 0 5075 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611
Link Speed (mph) 40 40 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 385 366 1313 668
Travel Time (s) 6.6 6.2 35.8 18.2
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 9
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1497 7 0 1394 21 0 0 23 0 0 23
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1504 0 0 1415 0 0 0 23 0 0 23
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 7th TWSC Existing
6: S Orange Ave & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 9:45-12 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 15
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1482 7 0 1380 21 0 0 23 0 0 23
Future Vol, veh/h 0 1482 7 0 1380 21 0 0 23 0 0 23
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - -0 - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 1497 7 0 1394 21 0 0 23 0 0 23
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 - - 0 - - 752 - - 717
Stage 1 - -----------
Stage 2 - -----------
Critical Hdwy - - - - - - - - 7.14 - - 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - - - - 3.92 - - 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 - - 0 0 303 0 0 319
Stage 1 0 - - 0 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - - - - 303 - - 317
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----------
Stage 1 - -----------
Stage 2 - -----------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 17.88 17.27

HCM LOS C C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 303 - - - - 317
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.077 - - - - 0.073
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 17.9 - - - - 17.3
HCM Lane LOS C - - - -C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - - - 0.2
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
7: S Flower Ave & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 9:45-12 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 16
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 49 1452 1 0 1335 21 0 0 4 8 0 65
Future Volume (vph) 49 1452 1 0 1335 21 0 0 4 8 0 65
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 130 0 0 0 0 0 0 100
Storage Lanes 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.998 0.865 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 0 0 5075 0 0 0 1611 1770 0 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 0 0 5075 0 0 0 1611 1770 0 1583 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 366 681 1312 750
Travel Time (s) 6.2 11.6 35.8 20.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 52 1528 1 0 1405 22 0 0 4 8 0 68
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 52 1529 0 0 1427 0 0 0 4 8 0 68
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 7th TWSC Existing
7: S Flower Ave & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 9:45-12 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 17
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 49 1452 1 0 1335 21 0 0 4 8 0 65
Future Vol, veh/h 49 1452 1 0 1335 21 0 0 4 8 0 65
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 130 - - - - - - - 0 0 - 100
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 52 1528 1 0 1405 22 0 0 4 8 0 68
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1434 0 0 - - 0 - - 765 2138 - 721
Stage 1 - -------- 1423 - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - - - 715 - -
Critical Hdwy 5.34 - - - - - - - 7.14 6.44 - 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - - - 7.34 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - - - 6.74 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 - - - - - - - 3.92 3.82 - 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 240 - - 0 - - 0 0 297 52 0 317
Stage 1 - - - 0 - - 0 0 - 100 0 -
Stage 2 - - - 0 - - 0 0 - 353 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 239 - - - - - - - 297 40 - 315
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - - - 40 - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - - - 100 - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - - - 273 - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0.79 0 17.3 30.31

HCM LOS C D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 297 239 - - - - 40 315
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 0.216 - - - - 0.211 0.217
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 17.3 24.2 - - - - 117.7 19.6
HCM Lane LOS C C - - - -FC
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.8 - - - - 0.7 0.8
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
8: Sycamore Ave/Alley & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 9:45-12 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 18
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 7 1444 10 21 1349 3 2 0 8305
Future Volume (vph) 7 1444 10 21 1349 3 2 0 8305
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 75 0 120 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.999 0.892 0.916
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.990 0.982
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5080 0 1770 5085 0 0 1645 0 0 1676 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.990 0.982
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5080 0 1770 5085 0 0 1645 0 0 1676 0 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 681 517 606 991
Travel Time (s) 11.6 8.8 16.5 27.0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 7
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 7 1520 11 22 1420 3 2 0 8305
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 1531 0 22 1423 0 0 100080
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 7th TWSC Existing
8: Sycamore Ave/Alley & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 9:45-12 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 19
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 1444 10 21 13493208305
Future Vol, veh/h 7 1444 10 21 13493208305
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 75 - - 120 --------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 7 1520 11 22 14203208305
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1430 0 0 1533 0 0 2154 3016 767 2096 3020 719 Stage 1 - ----- 1542 1542 - 1473 1473 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 612 1474 - 623 1547 -
Critical Hdwy 5.34 - - 5.34 - - 6.44 6.54 7.14 6.44 6.54 7.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 7.34 5.54 - 7.34 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.74 5.54 - 6.74 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 - - 3.12 - - 3.82 4.02 3.92 3.82 4.02 3.92 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 241 - - 215 - - 51 13 296 55 13 318
Stage 1 - - - - - - 83 175 - 93 189 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 407 189 - 401 174 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 240 - - 214 - - 43 11 295 46 11 316
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 43 11 - 46 11 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 80 169 - 82 169 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 359 168 - 378 168 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0.1 0.36 33.54 44.52

HCM LOS D E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 137 240 - - 214 - - 99
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.077 0.031 - - 0.103 - - 0.085
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 33.5 20.5 - - 23.7 - - 44.5
HCM Lane LOS D C - - C - - E
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.1 - - 0.3 - - 0.3
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
1: S Brea Boulevard & W Birch St/E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 1-3 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 56 79 32 279 102 343 40 524 194 302 530 49 Future Volume (vph) 56 79 32 279 102 343 40 524 194 302 530 49 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 215 0 250 0 225 0 280 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 2 1 1 0 2 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.91 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.98 0.99 1.00
Frt 0.956 0.850 0.960 0.987
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1762 0 3433 1863 1583 1770 4855 0 3433 4996 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1762 0 3433 1863 1549 1770 4855 0 3433 4996 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 15 361 69 12
Link Speed (mph) 25 35 35 35
Link Distance (ft) 1165 380 688 613
Travel Time (s) 31.8 7.4 13.4 11.9
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 19 9 5 10
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 59 83 34 294 107 361 42 552 204 318 558 52 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 59 117 0 294 107 361 42 756 0 318 610 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
1: S Brea Boulevard & W Birch St/E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 1-3 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 2
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 8
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 5 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 8.0 6.0 8.0 6.0 6.0 8.0 15.0 8.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.5 37.6 12.5 39.9 39.9 12.5 29.9 12.5 27.9 Total Split (s) 22.0 38.0 25.0 41.0 41.0 22.0 40.0 27.0 45.0 Total Split (%) 16.9% 29.2% 19.2% 31.5% 31.5% 16.9% 30.8% 20.8% 34.6% Maximum Green (s) 17.5 33.4 20.5 36.1 36.1 17.5 33.1 22.5 38.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.6 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.5 3.0 1.5 3.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.9 4.9 4.5 6.9 4.5 6.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Max None C-Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Don't Walk (s) 26.0 28.0 28.0 16.0 14.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 8 4 4 2 5
Act Effct Green (s) 9.5 15.1 15.5 23.3 23.3 15.6 62.5 16.4 65.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.12 0.12 0.18 0.18 0.12 0.48 0.13 0.51 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.54 0.72 0.32 0.63 0.20 0.32 0.74 0.24
Control Delay (s/veh) 68.8 53.7 65.3 47.5 9.0 65.1 29.6 65.0 21.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 68.8 53.7 65.3 47.5 9.0 65.1 29.6 65.0 21.5

LOS E D E D A E C E C
Approach Delay (s/veh) 58.8 36.1 31.5 36.4
Approach LOS E D C D
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 99 (76%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 95
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74
Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 36.3 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 1: S Brea Boulevard & W Birch St/E Birch St HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing
1: S Brea Boulevard & W Birch St/E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 1-3 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 56 79 32 279 102 343 40 524 194 302 530 49 Future Volume (veh/h) 56 79 32 279 102 343 40 524 194 302 530 49 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 59 83 20 294 107 64 42 552 168 318 558 47 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 97 178 43 351 321 268 539 1972 585 376 1402 117 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.17 0.17 0.10 0.17 0.17 0.11 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1435 346 3456 1870 1560 1781 3904 1158 3456 4785 398 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 59 0 103 294 107 64 42 479 241 318 395 210 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1781 1728 1870 1560 1781 1702 1658 1728 1702 1779 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.2 0.0 7.0 10.9 6.5 4.6 2.8 16.0 16.5 11.7 12.1 12.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.2 0.0 7.0 10.9 6.5 4.6 2.8 16.0 16.5 11.7 12.1 12.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.70 1.00 0.22
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 97 0 221 351 321 268 539 1720 837 376 998 521 V/C Ratio(X) 0.61 0.00 0.47 0.84 0.33 0.24 0.08 0.28 0.29 0.85 0.40 0.40 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 240 0 458 545 519 433 539 1720 837 598 998 521 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 60.1 0.0 52.9 57.3 47.3 46.5 42.1 33.5 33.7 56.8 36.7 36.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.3 0.0 0.6 3.8 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.8 3.4 1.2 2.3 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.0 0.0 3.2 4.9 3.1 1.8 1.2 7.4 7.5 5.3 5.2 5.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 62.4 0.0 53.5 61.2 47.5 46.7 42.1 33.8 34.5 60.3 37.9 39.1 LnGrp LOS E D E D D D C C E D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 162 465 762 923
Approach Delay, s/veh 56.7 56.0 34.5 45.9
Approach LOS E E C D
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.7 72.6 17.7 21.1 46.2 45.0 11.5 27.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 6.9 4.5 * 4.9 6.9 * 6.9 4.5 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.5 33.1 20.5 * 33 17.5 * 38 17.5 36.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.7 18.5 12.9 9.0 4.8 14.3 6.2 8.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 2.7 0.3 0.3 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 44.9
HCM 7th LOS D
Notes
* HCM 7th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
2: S Orange Ave & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 1-3 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 4
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 2 577 30 9 695 10 9 3 38 0 0 16
Future Volume (vph) 2 577 30 9 695 10 9 3 38 0 0 16
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 80 130 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.850 0.998 0.896 0.865
Flt Protected 0.950 0.991
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3539 1583 1770 3532 0 0 1654000 1611 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.991
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 1583 1770 3532 0 0 1654000 1611 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 380 364 668 208
Travel Time (s) 7.4 7.1 18.2 5.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 1
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 2 656 34 10 790 11 10 3 43 0 0 18
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 658 34 10 801 0 0 56 0 0 0 18
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 7th TWSC Existing
2: S Orange Ave & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 1-3 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 577 30 9 695 10 9 3 38 0 0 16
Future Vol, veh/h 2 577 30 9 695 10 9 3 38 0 0 16
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 10 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 80 130 - - - - - - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 2 656 34 10 790 11 10 3 43 0 0 18
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 802 0 0 700 0 0 1086 1493 338 - - 402 Stage 1 - - - - - - 670 670 - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 415 823 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 - - 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 - - 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 817 - - 893 - - 171 122 658 0 0 598
Stage 1 - - - - - - 413 453 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 585 386 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 816 - - 884 - - 162 119 652 - - 598
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 162 119 - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 407 448 - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 561 381 - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0.03 0.11 16.89 11.21

HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 359 816 - - 884 - - 598
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.158 0.003 - - 0.012 - - 0.03
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 16.9 9.4 - - 9.1 - - 11.2
HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0 - - 0 - - 0.1
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
3: S Flower Ave & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 1-3 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 6
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 34 573 11 54 642 23 36 43 25 45 10 37 Future Volume (vph) 34 573 11 54 642 23 36 43 25 45 10 37 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 120 0 185 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 0.98
Frt 0.997 0.995 0.967 0.946
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.983 0.976
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3526 0 1770 3518 0 0 1735 0 0 1720 0 Flt Permitted 0.337 0.384 0.887 0.834
Satd. Flow (perm) 628 3526 0 715 3518 0 0 1566 0 0 1470 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 3 6 28 41
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 364 329 750 397
Travel Time (s) 7.1 6.4 20.5 10.8
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 12 4 118
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 2 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 38 637 12 60 713 26 40 48 28 50 11 41
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 38 649 0 60 739 0 0 116 0 0 102 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
3: S Flower Ave & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 1-3 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 7
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 2 6 8 4
Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4
Detector Phase 2 2 6 6 8 8 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Minimum Split (s) 26.9 26.9 26.9 26.9 35.6 35.6 35.6 35.6 Total Split (s) 26.9 26.9 26.9 26.9 35.6 35.6 35.6 35.6 Total Split (%) 43.0% 43.0% 43.0% 43.0% 57.0% 57.0% 57.0% 57.0% Maximum Green (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.6 4.6
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Recall Mode Max Max Max Max None None None None
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Don't Walk (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 6 6 2 2 73 73 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 29.1 29.1 29.1 29.1 18.7 18.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.35 0.35
v/c Ratio 0.11 0.34 0.16 0.39 0.21 0.19
Control Delay (s/veh) 15.1 13.2 15.4 13.6 8.3 6.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 15.1 13.2 15.4 13.6 8.3 6.8

LOS B B B B A A
Approach Delay (s/veh) 13.3 13.7 8.3 6.8
Approach LOS B B A A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 62.5
Actuated Cycle Length: 54.1
Natural Cycle: 65
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.39
Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 12.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: S Flower Ave & E Birch St
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing
3: S Flower Ave & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 1-3 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 34 573 11 54 642 23 36 43 25 45 10 37 Future Volume (veh/h) 34 573 11 54 642 23 36 43 25 45 10 37 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.90 0.92 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 38 637 12 60 713 24 40 48 10 50 11 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 348 1542 29 382 1516 51 310 345 63 454 102 93 Arrive On Green 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 Sat Flow, veh/h 720 3565 67 779 3504 118 553 906 166 881 268 245 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 38 317 332 60 361 376 98 0 0 74 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 720 1777 1855 779 1777 1845 1625 0 0 1394 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.0 6.3 6.3 2.9 7.4 7.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.4 6.3 6.3 9.2 7.4 7.4 1.8 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.06 0.41 0.10 0.68 0.18
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 348 768 802 382 768 798 718 0 0 649 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.11 0.41 0.41 0.16 0.47 0.47 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 348 768 802 382 768 798 1083 0 0 959 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 13.6 10.0 10.0 13.2 10.3 10.3 10.3 0.0 0.0 10.2 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 1.6 1.6 0.9 2.1 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 2.2 2.3 0.5 2.7 2.8 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 14.3 11.6 11.5 14.0 12.3 12.3 10.3 0.0 0.0 10.2 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B B B B B B B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 687 797 98 74
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.7 12.4 10.3 10.2
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.9 24.0 26.9 24.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 4.6 4.9 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 31.0 22.0 31.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.4 3.4 11.2 3.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 0.3 1.4 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 11.9
HCM 7th LOS B
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
4: Alley & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 1-3 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 9
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 3 618 21 16 717 8 0 0 1 2 0 3
Future Volume (vph) 3 618 21 16 717 8 0 0 1 2 0 3
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 40 0 140 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.995 0.998 0.865 0.919
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.980
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3522 0 1770 3532 0 0 1611 0 0 1678 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.980
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3522 0 1770 3532 0 0 1611 0 0 1678 0 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 329 815 991 416
Travel Time (s) 6.4 15.9 27.0 11.3
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 83 5
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 3 651 22 17 755 8 0 0 1 2 0 3
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 3 673 0 17 763 0 0 1 0050
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 7th TWSC Existing
4: Alley & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 1-3 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 10
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 618 21 16 717 8 0 0 1 2 0 3
Future Vol, veh/h 3 618 21 16 717 8 0 0 1 2 0 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 83 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 40 - - 140 --------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 3 651 22 17 755 8 0 0 1 2 0 3
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 768 0 0 756 0 0 1162 1553 419 1129 1560 387 Stage 1 - - - - - - 751 751 - 798 798 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 411 802 - 332 762 -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 842 - - 851 - - 150 112 583 159 111 612 Stage 1 - - - - - - 369 417 - 346 396 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 589 395 - 656 412 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 838 - - 784 - - 134 100 537 154 99 609 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 134 100 - 154 99 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 339 382 - 337 386 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 573 384 - 652 378 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0.04 0.21 11.72 18.17

HCM LOS B C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 537 838 - - 784 - - 279
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.004 - - 0.021 - - 0.019
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 11.7 9.3 - - 9.7 - - 18.2
HCM Lane LOS B A - - A - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.1
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
5: S Brea Boulevard & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 1-3 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 11
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 125 1211 379 308 1257 114 372 526 219 211 501 153 Future Volume (vph) 125 1211 379 308 1257 114 372 526 219 211 501 153 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 225 160 230 185 355 180 245 0
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.97 0.98 0.97
Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1551 3433 5085 1536 3433 5085 1544 3433 3539 1542 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 259 97 228 159
Link Speed (mph) 40 40 35 35
Link Distance (ft) 615 385 495 688
Travel Time (s) 10.5 6.6 9.6 13.4
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 17 11 11
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 2 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 130 1261 395 321 1309 119 388 548 228 220 522 159 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 130 1261 395 321 1309 119 388 548 228 220 522 159 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
5: S Brea Boulevard & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4
Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4
Detector Phase 5 2 2 1 6 6 3 8 8 7 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 15.0 15.0 7.0 15.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.6 42.3 42.3 11.6 42.3 42.3 14.6 41.6 41.6 15.3 39.6 39.6 Total Split (s) 18.6 47.5 47.5 19.6 48.5 48.5 21.6 41.6 41.6 21.3 39.6 39.6 Total Split (%) 14.3% 36.5% 36.5% 15.1% 37.3% 37.3% 16.6% 32.0% 32.0% 16.4% 30.5% 30.5% Maximum Green (s) 14.0 42.2 42.2 15.0 43.2 43.2 17.0 37.0 37.0 16.0 35.0 35.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.6 4.3 4.3 3.6 4.3 4.3 3.6 3.6 3.6 4.3 3.6 3.6 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.6 5.3 5.3 4.6 5.3 5.3 4.6 4.6 4.6 5.3 4.6 4.6 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min Min C-Min C-Min None None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Don't Walk (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 28.0 28.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 4 4 8 8 6 6 6 6
Act Effct Green (s) 10.5 52.3 52.3 14.7 56.5 56.5 16.6 30.4 30.4 12.8 27.3 27.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.40 0.40 0.11 0.43 0.43 0.13 0.23 0.23 0.10 0.21 0.21 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.62 0.51 0.83 0.59 0.16 0.89 0.46 0.43 0.65 0.70 0.35 Control Delay (s/veh) 62.7 33.6 13.0 74.3 30.5 8.1 78.5 43.6 7.1 82.5 57.9 19.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 62.7 33.6 13.0 74.3 30.5 8.1 78.5 43.6 7.1 82.5 57.9 19.9

LOS E C B E C A E D A F E B
Approach Delay (s/veh) 31.2 37.0 48.1 57.2
Approach LOS C D D E
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 101 (78%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 115
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89
Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 40.7 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 5: S Brea Boulevard & Imperial Highway HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing
5: S Brea Boulevard & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 1-3 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 13
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 125 1211 379 308 1257 114 372 526 219 211 501 153 Future Volume (veh/h) 125 1211 379 308 1257 114 372 526 219 211 501 153 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 130 1261 241 321 1309 65 388 548 54 220 522 34 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 263 1579 486 695 2245 680 437 1285 388 277 749 324 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.31 0.31 0.20 0.44 0.44 0.13 0.25 0.25 0.03 0.07 0.07 Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 5106 1573 3456 5106 1547 3456 5106 1543 3456 3554 1537 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 130 1261 241 321 1309 65 388 548 54 220 522 34 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1702 1573 1728 1702 1547 1728 1702 1543 1728 1777 1537 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.7 29.5 11.5 10.6 25.1 3.2 14.4 11.7 2.2 8.2 18.7 2.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.7 29.5 11.5 10.6 25.1 3.2 14.4 11.7 2.2 8.2 18.7 2.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 263 1579 486 695 2245 680 437 1285 388 277 749 324 V/C Ratio(X) 0.49 0.80 0.50 0.46 0.58 0.10 0.89 0.43 0.14 0.79 0.70 0.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 372 1658 511 695 2245 680 452 1453 439 425 957 414 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 57.6 41.2 18.3 45.7 27.4 21.3 55.9 40.8 14.9 62.2 56.4 49.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 4.3 3.6 0.2 1.1 0.3 17.9 0.5 0.3 2.5 2.5 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.0 12.7 4.6 4.5 10.1 1.2 7.3 4.9 1.4 3.9 9.2 1.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 58.2 45.5 21.9 45.9 28.6 21.6 73.8 41.3 15.3 64.7 59.0 49.3 LnGrp LOS E D C D C C E D B E E D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1632 1695 990 776
Approach Delay, s/veh 43.0 31.6 52.6 60.2
Approach LOS D C D E
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 31.5 45.5 21.0 32.0 14.5 62.5 15.7 37.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.3 * 5.3 4.6 4.6 4.6 5.3 5.3 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.0 * 42 17.0 35.0 14.0 43.2 16.0 37.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.6 31.5 16.4 20.7 6.7 27.1 10.2 13.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 8.7 0.1 5.0 0.1 12.0 0.2 7.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 43.7
HCM 7th LOS D
Notes
* HCM 7th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
6: S Orange Ave & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 1-3 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 14
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1640 19 0 1670 21 0 0 28 0 0 31
Future Volume (vph) 0 1640 19 0 1670 21 0 0 28 0 0 31
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.998 0.998 0.865 0.865
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5075 0 0 5075 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5075 0 0 5075 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611
Link Speed (mph) 40 40 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 385 366 1313 668
Travel Time (s) 6.6 6.2 35.8 18.2
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 11
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1673 19 0 1704 21 0 0 29 0 0 32
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1692 0 0 1725 0 0 0 29 0 0 32
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 7th TWSC Existing
6: S Orange Ave & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 1-3 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 15
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1640 19 0 1670 21 0 0 28 0 0 31
Future Vol, veh/h 0 1640 19 0 1670 21 0 0 28 0 0 31
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 3 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - -0 - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 1673 19 0 1704 21 0 0 29 0 0 32
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 - - 0 - - 849 - - 874
Stage 1 - -----------
Stage 2 - -----------
Critical Hdwy - - - - - - - - 7.14 - - 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - - - - 3.92 - - 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 - - 0 0 261 0 0 252
Stage 1 0 - - 0 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - - - - 260 - - 249
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----------
Stage 1 - -----------
Stage 2 - -----------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 20.52 21.55

HCM LOS C C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 260 - - - - 249
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.11 - - - - 0.127
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 20.5 - - - - 21.6
HCM Lane LOS C - - - -C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - - - - 0.4
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
7: S Flower Ave & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 1-3 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 16
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 47 1610 3 0 1630 41 0 0 4 10 0 57
Future Volume (vph) 47 1610 3 0 1630 41 0 0 4 10 0 57
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 130 0 0 0 0 0 0 100
Storage Lanes 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.996 0.865 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 0 0 5065 0 0 0 1611 1770 0 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 0 0 5065 0 0 0 1611 1770 0 1583 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 366 681 1312 750
Travel Time (s) 6.2 11.6 35.8 20.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 13
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 48 1660 3 0 1680 42 0 0 4 10 0 59
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 1663 0 0 1722 0 0 0 4 10 0 59
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 7th TWSC Existing
7: S Flower Ave & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 1-3 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 17
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 47 1610 3 0 1630 41 0 0 4 10 0 57
Future Vol, veh/h 47 1610 3 0 1630 41 0 0 4 10 0 57
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 2 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 130 - - - - - - - 0 0 - 100
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 48 1660 3 0 1680 42 0 0 4 10 0 59
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1736 0 0 - - 0 - - 833 2475 - 874
Stage 1 - -------- 1715 - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - - - 761 - -
Critical Hdwy 5.34 - - - - - - - 7.14 6.44 - 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - - - 7.34 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - - - 6.74 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 - - - - - - - 3.92 3.82 - 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 170 - - 0 - - 0 0 268 32 0 251
Stage 1 - - - 0 - - 0 0 - 62 0 -
Stage 2 - - - 0 - - 0 0 - 331 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 168 - - - - - - - 267 22 - 248
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - - - 22 - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - - - 61 - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - - - 232 - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0.99 0 18.69 60.58

HCM LOS C F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 267 168 - - - - 22 248
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.015 0.289 - - - - 0.468 0.237
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 18.7 34.9 - - - - 269.4 23.9
HCM Lane LOS C D - - - -FC
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 1.1 - - - - 1.4 0.9
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
8: Sycamore Ave/Alley & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 1-3 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 18
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 11 1595 14 23 1643 1 1 0 13 4 0 28 Future Volume (vph) 11 1595 14 23 1643 1 1 0 13 4 0 28
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 75 0 120 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.999 0.874 0.881
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.997 0.994
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5080 0 1770 5085 0 0 1623 0 0 1631 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.997 0.994
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5080 0 1770 5085 0 0 1623 0 0 1631 0 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 681 517 606 991
Travel Time (s) 11.6 8.8 16.5 27.0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 4
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 2 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 11 1661 15 24 1711 1 1 0 14 4 0 29
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 11 1676 0 24 1712 0 0 15 0 0 33 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 7th TWSC Existing
8: Sycamore Ave/Alley & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 1-3 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 19
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 1595 14 23 1643 1 1 0 13 4 0 28
Future Vol, veh/h 11 1595 14 23 1643 1 1 0 13 4 0 28
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 75 - - 120 --------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 11 1661 15 24 1711 1 1 0 14 4 0 29
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1717 0 0 1678 0 0 2426 3458 840 2451 3465 860 Stage 1 - ----- 1694 1694 - 1764 1764 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 733 1764 - 688 1701 -
Critical Hdwy 5.34 - - 5.34 - - 6.44 6.54 7.14 6.44 6.54 7.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 7.34 5.54 - 7.34 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.74 5.54 - 6.74 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 - - 3.12 - - 3.82 4.02 3.92 3.82 4.02 3.92 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 174 - - 182 - - 34 7 265 33 7 257
Stage 1 - - - - - - 64 147 - 57 136 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 344 136 - 366 146 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 173 - - 181 - - 25 5 264 25 5 256
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 25 5 - 25 5 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 60 137 - 49 117 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 265 117 - 325 136 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0.19 0.38 30.5 46.37

HCM LOS D E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 156 173 - - 181 - - 120
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.094 0.066 - - 0.132 - - 0.279
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 30.5 27.3 - - 27.9 - - 46.4
HCM Lane LOS D D - - D - - E
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.2 - - 0.4 - - 1.1
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
1: S Brea Boulevard & W Birch St/E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 4-6 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 68 108 30 339 150 423 55 682 261 403 532 89 Future Volume (vph) 68 108 30 339 150 423 55 682 261 403 532 89 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 215 0 250 0 225 0 280 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 2 1 1 0 2 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.91 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.91 0.97 0.98
Frt 0.967 0.850 0.958 0.978
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1781 0 3433 1863 1583 1770 4717 0 3433 4869 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1781 0 3433 1863 1443 1770 4717 0 3433 4869 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 10 407 79 27
Link Speed (mph) 25 35 35 35
Link Distance (ft) 1165 380 688 613
Travel Time (s) 31.8 7.4 13.4 11.9
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 33 70 61 41
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 2 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 72 114 32 357 158 445 58 718 275 424 560 94 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 72 146 0 357 158 445 58 993 0 424 654 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
1: S Brea Boulevard & W Birch St/E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 4-6 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 2
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 8
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 5 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 8.0 6.0 8.0 6.0 6.0 8.0 15.0 8.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.5 37.6 12.5 39.9 39.9 12.5 29.9 12.5 27.9 Total Split (s) 18.0 38.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 22.0 49.0 23.0 50.0 Total Split (%) 13.8% 29.2% 15.4% 30.8% 30.8% 16.9% 37.7% 17.7% 38.5% Maximum Green (s) 13.5 33.4 15.5 35.1 35.1 17.5 42.1 18.5 43.1 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.6 3.0 3.9 3.9 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9
All-Red Time (s) 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.5 3.0 1.5 3.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.9 4.9 4.5 6.9 4.5 6.9 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Max None C-Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Don't Walk (s) 26.0 28.0 28.0 16.0 14.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 16 38 38 38 23
Act Effct Green (s) 10.1 26.4 15.2 33.7 33.7 15.6 49.9 18.0 54.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.20 0.12 0.26 0.26 0.12 0.38 0.14 0.42 v/c Ratio 0.53 0.40 0.89 0.33 0.66 0.27 0.53 0.89 0.32
Control Delay (s/veh) 71.0 42.8 85.2 40.1 13.1 37.8 15.2 76.8 27.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 71.0 42.8 85.2 40.1 13.1 37.8 15.2 76.8 27.6

LOS E D F D B D B E C
Approach Delay (s/veh) 52.2 44.4 16.4 47.0
Approach LOS D D B D
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 3 (2%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 95
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89
Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 36.9 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 1: S Brea Boulevard & W Birch St/E Birch St HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing
1: S Brea Boulevard & W Birch St/E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 4-6 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 68 108 30 339 150 423 55 682 261 403 532 89 Future Volume (veh/h) 68 108 30 339 150 423 55 682 261 403 532 89 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.92 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 72 114 24 357 158 144 58 718 227 424 560 78 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 101 242 51 402 417 320 374 1608 499 473 1488 203 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.16 0.16 0.19 0.37 0.37 0.42 0.85 0.85 0.14 0.33 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1475 310 3456 1870 1436 1781 3800 1180 3456 4488 611 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 72 0 138 357 158 144 58 642 303 424 422 216 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1785 1728 1870 1436 1781 1702 1576 1728 1702 1695 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.2 0.0 9.1 13.1 8.0 9.8 2.6 6.1 6.3 15.7 12.3 12.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.2 0.0 9.1 13.1 8.0 9.8 2.6 6.1 6.3 15.7 12.3 12.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.36
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 101 0 293 402 417 320 374 1440 667 473 1129 562 V/C Ratio(X) 0.71 0.00 0.47 0.89 0.38 0.45 0.16 0.45 0.45 0.90 0.37 0.38 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 185 0 459 412 505 388 374 1440 667 492 1129 562 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.67 1.67 1.67 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 60.2 0.0 49.3 51.6 34.2 34.8 30.6 6.2 6.3 55.2 33.2 33.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.4 0.0 0.4 19.4 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.9 1.9 17.8 0.9 2.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.4 0.0 4.2 6.3 3.4 3.2 1.1 1.8 1.9 8.0 5.2 5.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 63.6 0.0 49.7 70.9 34.4 35.1 30.6 7.1 8.2 73.0 34.1 35.3 LnGrp LOS E D E C D C A A E C D
Approach Vol, veh/h 210 659 1003 1062
Approach Delay, s/veh 54.5 54.4 8.8 49.9
Approach LOS D D A D
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.3 61.9 19.6 26.2 34.2 50.0 11.9 33.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 6.9 4.5 * 4.9 6.9 * 6.9 4.5 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 42.1 15.5 * 33 17.5 * 43 13.5 35.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 17.7 8.3 15.1 11.1 4.6 14.7 7.2 11.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 4.6 0.0 0.5 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 37.2
HCM 7th LOS D
Notes
* HCM 7th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
2: S Orange Ave & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 4-6 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 4
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 7 670 82 51 888 23 17 3 38 0 0 34
Future Volume (vph) 7 670 82 51 888 23 17 3 38 0 0 34
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 80 130 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.850 0.996 0.911 0.865
Flt Protected 0.999 0.950 0.986
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3536 1583 1770 3525 0 0 1673000 1611 Flt Permitted 0.999 0.950 0.986
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3536 1583 1770 3525 0 0 1673000 1611 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 380 364 668 208
Travel Time (s) 7.4 7.1 18.2 5.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 4
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 8 728 89 55 965 25 18 3 41 0 0 37
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 736 89 55 990 0 0 62 0 0 0 37
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 7th TWSC Existing
2: S Orange Ave & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 4-6 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 670 82 51 888 23 17 3 38 0 0 34
Future Vol, veh/h 7 670 82 51 888 23 17 3 38 0 0 34
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 8 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 80 130 - - - - - - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 8 728 89 55 965 25 18 3 41 0 0 37
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 994 0 0 825 0 0 1345 1857 372 - - 499 Stage 1 - - - - - - 751 751 - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 593 1105 - - - -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 - - 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 - - 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 691 - - 801 - - 110 73 625 0 0 517
Stage 1 - - - - - - 369 416 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 459 285 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 689 - - 795 - - 93 66 620 - - 515
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 93 66 - - - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 361 407 - - - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 396 264 - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0.09 0.52 31.05 12.53

HCM LOS D B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 200 689 - - 795 - - 515
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.315 0.011 - - 0.07 - - 0.072
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 31 10.3 - - 9.9 - - 12.5
HCM Lane LOS D B - - A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.3 0 - - 0.2 - - 0.2
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
3: S Flower Ave & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 4-6 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 6
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 20 671 12 67 911 16 38 11 57 23 2 17 Future Volume (vph) 20 671 12 67 911 16 38 11 57 23 2 17 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 120 0 185 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99
Frt 0.997 0.997 0.928 0.945
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.982 0.973
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3527 0 1770 3527 0 0 1683 0 0 1704 0 Flt Permitted 0.274 0.375 0.870 0.857
Satd. Flow (perm) 510 3527 0 699 3527 0 0 1491 0 0 1501 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 3 3 60 18
Link Speed (mph) 35 35 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 364 329 750 397
Travel Time (s) 7.1 6.4 20.5 10.8
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 6 6 1
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 21 706 13 71 959 17 40 12 60 24 2 18
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 21 719 0 71 976 0 0 112 0 0 44 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
3: S Flower Ave & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 4-6 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 7
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 2 6 8 4
Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4
Detector Phase 2 2 6 6 8 8 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Minimum Split (s) 26.9 26.9 26.9 26.9 35.6 35.6 35.6 35.6 Total Split (s) 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (%) 44.6% 44.6% 44.6% 44.6% 55.4% 55.4% 55.4% 55.4% Maximum Green (s) 24.1 24.1 24.1 24.1 31.4 31.4 31.4 31.4 Yellow Time (s) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.6 4.6
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Recall Mode C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Don't Walk (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 2 2 3 3 3 3 1 1
Act Effct Green (s) 47.2 47.2 47.2 47.2 11.1 11.1
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.17 0.17
v/c Ratio 0.06 0.28 0.14 0.38 0.37 0.16
Control Delay (s/veh) 6.3 4.9 8.7 7.3 15.2 13.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 6.3 4.9 8.7 7.3 15.2 13.2

LOS A A A A B B
Approach Delay (s/veh) 4.9 7.4 15.2 13.2
Approach LOS A A B B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 65
Actuated Cycle Length: 65
Offset: 18 (28%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 65
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.38
Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 7.0 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: S Flower Ave & E Birch St
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing
3: S Flower Ave & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 4-6 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 20 671 12 67 911 16 38 11 57 23 2 17 Future Volume (veh/h) 20 671 12 67 911 16 38 11 57 23 2 17 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 21 706 13 71 959 17 40 12 14 24 2 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 504 2740 50 632 2744 49 157 37 28 204 19 14
Arrive On Green 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 Sat Flow, veh/h 576 3568 66 733 3572 63 793 432 330 1194 222 163 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 21 352 367 71 477 499 66 0 0 29 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 576 1777 1857 733 1777 1859 1555 0 0 1579 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 3.7 3.7 2.0 5.5 5.5 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.3 3.7 3.7 5.7 5.5 5.5 2.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.03 0.61 0.21 0.83 0.10
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 504 1365 1426 632 1365 1428 222 0 0 237 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.04 0.26 0.26 0.11 0.35 0.35 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 504 1365 1426 632 1365 1428 820 0 0 797 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 3.4 2.2 2.2 3.0 2.4 2.4 28.3 0.0 0.0 27.6 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 0.6 0.7 0.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 3.5 2.6 2.6 3.4 3.1 3.1 28.5 0.0 0.0 27.7 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 740 1047 66 29
Approach Delay, s/veh 2.7 3.1 28.5 27.7
Approach LOS A A C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 54.8 10.2 54.8 10.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 4.6 4.9 4.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 24.1 31.4 24.1 31.4
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.3 3.0 7.7 4.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.4 0.1 2.2 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 4.2
HCM 7th LOS A
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
4: Alley & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 4-6 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 9
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 3 763 7 1 985 1 4 0 9 0 0 0
Future Volume (vph) 3 763 7 1 985 1 4 0 9 0 0 0
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 40 0 140 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.999 0.907
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.985
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3536 0 1770 3539 0 0 1664 0 0 1863 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.985
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3536 0 1770 3539 0 0 1664 0 0 1863 0 Link Speed (mph) 35 35 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 329 815 991 416
Travel Time (s) 6.4 15.9 27.0 11.3
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 15 6
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 6 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 3 803 7 1 1037 1 4 0 9 0 0 0
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 3 810 0 1 1038 0 0 130000
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 7th TWSC Existing
4: Alley & E Birch St Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 4-6 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 10
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 763 7 1 985 1 4 0 9 0 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 3 763 7 1 985 1 4 0 9 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 15 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 40 - - 140 --------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 3 803 7 1 1037 1 4 0 9 0 0 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 1044 0 0 826 0 0 1349 1874 420 1453 1877 525 Stage 1 - - - - - - 828 828 - 1045 1045 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 521 1046 - 408 832 -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 662 - - 801 - - 109 71 582 91 71 497 Stage 1 - - - - - - 331 384 - 244 304 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 507 304 - 591 382 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 658 - - 789 - - 107 69 573 89 69 494 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 107 69 - 89 69 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 325 376 - 243 302 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 506 301 - 579 375 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0.04 0.01 20.57 0

HCM LOS C A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 245 658 - - 789 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.056 0.005 - - 0.001 - - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 20.6 10.5 - - 9.6 - - 0
HCM Lane LOS C B - - A - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - -
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
5: S Brea Boulevard & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 4-6 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 11
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 165 1486 404 210 1527 162 443 707 267 171 571 179 Future Volume (vph) 165 1486 404 210 1527 162 443 707 267 171 571 179 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 225 160 230 185 355 180 245 0
Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.97
Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1551 3433 5085 1556 3433 5085 1553 3433 3539 1539 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 220 98 281 188
Link Speed (mph) 40 40 35 35
Link Distance (ft) 615 385 495 688
Travel Time (s) 10.5 6.6 9.6 13.4
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 5 5 14
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 3 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 174 1564 425 221 1607 171 466 744 281 180 601 188 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 174 1564 425 221 1607 171 466 744 281 180 601 188 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
5: S Brea Boulevard & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4
Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4
Detector Phase 5 2 2 1 6 6 3 8 8 7 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 15.0 15.0 7.0 15.0 15.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 14.6 42.3 42.3 11.6 42.3 42.3 14.6 41.6 41.6 15.3 39.6 39.6 Total Split (s) 20.6 45.5 45.5 20.6 45.5 45.5 21.6 42.6 42.6 21.3 39.6 39.6 Total Split (%) 15.8% 35.0% 35.0% 15.8% 35.0% 35.0% 16.6% 32.8% 32.8% 16.4% 30.5% 30.5% Maximum Green (s) 16.0 40.2 40.2 16.0 40.2 40.2 17.0 38.0 38.0 16.0 35.0 35.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.6 4.3 4.3 3.6 4.3 4.3 3.6 3.6 3.6 4.3 3.6 3.6 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.6 5.3 5.3 4.6 5.3 5.3 4.6 4.6 4.6 5.3 4.6 4.6 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Gap (s) 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min Min C-Min C-Min None None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Don't Walk (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 28.0 28.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 3 3 2 2 2 2 7 7
Act Effct Green (s) 11.5 48.5 48.5 16.0 53.0 53.0 17.0 34.0 34.0 11.7 29.4 29.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.37 0.37 0.12 0.41 0.41 0.13 0.26 0.26 0.09 0.23 0.23 v/c Ratio 0.57 0.82 0.59 0.52 0.78 0.25 1.04 0.56 0.46 0.58 0.75 0.38 Control Delay (s/veh) 64.3 41.9 19.7 58.4 37.4 13.2 107.6 43.1 6.6 79.0 43.6 11.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 64.3 41.9 19.7 58.4 37.4 13.2 107.6 43.1 6.6 79.0 43.6 11.6

LOS E D B E D B F D A E D B
Approach Delay (s/veh) 39.4 37.7 56.3 43.9
Approach LOS D D E D
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 130
Actuated Cycle Length: 130
Offset: 59 (45%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 115
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.04
Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 43.3 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 5: S Brea Boulevard & Imperial Highway HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary Existing
5: S Brea Boulevard & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 4-6 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 13
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 165 1486 404 210 1527 162 443 707 267 171 571 179 Future Volume (veh/h) 165 1486 404 210 1527 162 443 707 267 171 571 179 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 174 1564 286 221 1607 113 466 744 77 180 601 44 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 265 1579 480 634 2152 666 452 1393 424 265 797 344 Arrive On Green 0.08 0.31 0.31 0.18 0.42 0.42 0.13 0.27 0.27 0.10 0.30 0.30 Sat Flow, veh/h 3456 5106 1554 3456 5106 1579 3456 5106 1554 3456 3554 1535 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 174 1564 286 221 1607 113 466 744 77 180 601 44 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1728 1702 1554 1728 1702 1579 1728 1702 1554 1728 1777 1535 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.4 39.7 14.2 7.3 34.5 5.8 17.0 16.1 3.2 6.5 19.9 2.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.4 39.7 14.2 7.3 34.5 5.8 17.0 16.1 3.2 6.5 19.9 2.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 265 1579 480 634 2152 666 452 1393 424 265 797 344 V/C Ratio(X) 0.66 0.99 0.60 0.35 0.75 0.17 1.03 0.53 0.18 0.68 0.75 0.13 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 425 1579 480 634 2152 666 452 1493 454 425 957 413 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.84 0.84 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 58.3 44.7 18.7 46.3 31.8 23.4 56.5 40.2 15.0 56.8 42.4 36.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 20.5 5.4 0.1 2.4 0.6 50.6 0.7 0.4 1.0 3.4 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.8 19.2 5.7 3.1 14.2 2.3 10.5 6.8 1.9 2.8 8.6 1.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 59.4 65.2 24.0 46.4 34.2 24.0 107.1 40.9 15.4 57.8 45.8 36.6 LnGrp LOS E E C D C C F D B E D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 2024 1941 1287 825
Approach Delay, s/veh 58.9 35.0 63.4 47.9
Approach LOS E C E D
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 29.2 45.5 21.6 33.7 14.6 60.1 15.3 40.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.3 * 5.3 4.6 4.6 4.6 5.3 5.3 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 * 40 17.0 35.0 16.0 40.2 16.0 38.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.3 41.7 19.0 21.9 8.4 36.5 8.5 18.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.2 3.4 0.2 8.9 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 50.7
HCM 7th LOS D
Notes
* HCM 7th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
6: S Orange Ave & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 4-6 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 14
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1912 20 0 1878 38 0 0 21 0 0 36
Future Volume (vph) 0 1912 20 0 1878 38 0 0 21 0 0 36
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.998 0.997 0.865 0.865
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5075 0 0 5070 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5075 0 0 5070 0 0 0 1611 0 0 1611
Link Speed (mph) 40 40 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 385 366 1313 668
Travel Time (s) 6.6 6.2 35.8 18.2
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 1
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 2013 21 0 1977 40 0 0 22 0 0 38
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 2034 0 0 2017 0 0 0 22 0 0 38
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 7th TWSC Existing
6: S Orange Ave & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 4-6 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 15
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1912 20 0 1878 38 0 0 21 0 0 36
Future Vol, veh/h 0 1912 20 0 1878 38 0 0 21 0 0 36
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - -0 - -0
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 2013 21 0 1977 40 0 0 22 0 0 38
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 - - 0 - - 1021 - - 1009
Stage 1 - -----------
Stage 2 - -----------
Critical Hdwy - - - - - - - - 7.14 - - 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - - - - 3.92 - - 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 - - 0 0 201 0 0 204
Stage 1 0 - - 0 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 - - 0 0 - 0 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - - - - 200 - - 204
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -----------
Stage 1 - -----------
Stage 2 - -----------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 25.21 26.6

HCM LOS D D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 200 - - - - 204
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.11 - - - - 0.186
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 25.2 - - - - 26.6
HCM Lane LOS D - - - -D
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - - - - 0.7
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
7: S Flower Ave & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 4-6 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 16
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 72 1779 13 0 1912 36 0 0 2 5 0 68
Future Volume (vph) 72 1779 13 0 1912 36 0 0 2 5 0 68
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 130 0 0 0 0 0 0 100
Storage Lanes 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.999 0.997 0.865 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5080 0 0 5070 0 0 0 1611 1770 0 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5080 0 0 5070 0 0 0 1611 1770 0 1583 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 366 681 1312 750
Travel Time (s) 6.2 11.6 35.8 20.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 75 1853 14 0 1992 38 0 0 2 5 0 71
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 75 1867 0 0 2030 0 0 0 2 5 0 71
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.1% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 7th TWSC Existing
7: S Flower Ave & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 4-6 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 17
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 72 1779 13 0 1912 36 0 0 2 5 0 68
Future Vol, veh/h 72 1779 13 0 1912 36 0 0 2 5 0 68
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 130 - - - - - - - 0 0 - 100
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 75 1853 14 0 1992 38 0 0 2 5 0 71
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 2030 0 0 - - 0 - - 934 2903 - 1016 Stage 1 - -------- 2011 - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - - - 891 - -
Critical Hdwy 5.34 - - - - - - - 7.14 6.44 - 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - - - - 7.34 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - - - - 6.74 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 - - - - - - - 3.92 3.82 - 3.92
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 121 - - 0 - - 0 0 229 17 0 203
Stage 1 - - - 0 - - 0 0 - 38 0 -
Stage 2 - - - 0 - - 0 0 - 275 0 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 121 - - - - - - - 229 6 - 202
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - - - -6 - -
Stage 1 - - - - - - - - - 38 - -
Stage 2 - - - - - - - - - 103 - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 2.88 0 20.85 98.01

HCM LOS C F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 229 121 - - - - 6 202
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 0.622 - - - - 0.823 0.35
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 20.9 74.7 - - - -$ 994.7 32.1 HCM Lane LOS C F - - - -FD
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 3.2 - - - - 1.3 1.5
Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing
8: Sycamore Ave/Alley & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 4-6 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 18
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 18 1877 14 30 1986 2 3 0 14 0 0 10 Future Volume (vph) 18 1877 14 30 1986 2 3 0 14 0 0 10
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 75 0 120 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.999 0.887 0.865
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.992
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5080 0 1770 5085 0 0 1639 0 0 1611 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.992
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5080 0 1770 5085 0 0 1639 0 0 1611 0 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 681 517 606 991
Travel Time (s) 11.6 8.8 16.5 27.0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 6
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 6 9
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 19 1955 15 31 2069 2 3 0 15 0 0 10
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 19 1970 0 31 2071 0 0 18 0 0 10 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
HCM 7th TWSC Existing
8: Sycamore Ave/Alley & Imperial Highway Laurel Elementary Circulation Study 4-6 PM Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report
Fehr & Peers Page 19
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 1877 14 30 1986 2 3 0 14 0 0 10
Future Vol, veh/h 18 1877 14 30 1986 2 3 0 14 0 0 10
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 75 - - 120 --------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 19 1955 15 31 2069 2 3 0 15 0 0 10
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 2077 0 0 1971 0 0 2891 4140 986 2958 4147 1041 Stage 1 - ----- 2001 2001 - 2138 2138 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 890 2139 - 820 2008 -
Critical Hdwy 5.34 - - 5.34 - - 6.44 6.54 7.14 6.44 6.54 7.14 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 7.34 5.54 - 7.34 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.74 5.54 - 6.74 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.12 - - 3.12 - - 3.82 4.02 3.92 3.82 4.02 3.92 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 114 - - 129 - - 17 2 212 16 2 195
Stage 1 - - - - - - 38 103 - 30 88 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 275 88 - 304 102 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 114 - - 129 - - 10 1 212 9 1 194
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 10 1 - 9 1 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 32 86 - 23 66 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 197 66 - 236 85 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0.4 0.62 120.09 24.66

HCM LOS F C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 48 114 - - 129 - - 194
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.372 0.165 - - 0.242 - - 0.054
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 120.1 42.8 - - 41.5 - - 24.7
HCM Lane LOS F E - - E - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.3 0.6 - - 0.9 - - 0.2
City of Brea, Public Works Department
August 25, 2025

Page 41 of 50 ends

Brea City CouncilOctober 7, 2025

Brea City Council
October 7, 2025