Cities Index.
Costco Public Record

Brentwood City Council
July 25, 2023

Document
Costco Public Record
Meeting
July 25, 2023
Body
Brentwood City Council
Pages
17
Original file
20.7 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on pub-brentwood.escribemeetings.com. That file is the official record.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way 01/04/2023 Cumulative + Project PM Brentwood Costco TIA 2:32 pm 12/20/2022 Cumulative 2040 with Project PM Synchro 11 Report MAR Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 323 1164 413 168 1286 60 374 125 136 247 486 288 Future Volume (veh/h) 323 1164 413 168 1286 60 374 125 136 247 486 288 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1885 1900 1900 1885 1900 1885 1885 1856 1900 1900 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 336 1212 430 175 1340 62 390 130 142 257 506 300 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 3 0 0 1
Cap, veh/h 416 1892 582 319 1737 543 452 209 229 348 1174 359 Arrive On Green 0.12 0.37 0.37 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.13 0.26 0.26 0.10 0.23 0.23 Sat Flow, veh/h 3510 5147 1582 3510 5147 1607 3483 814 890 3510 5187 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 336 1212 430 175 1340 62 390 0 272 257 506 300 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1755 1716 1582 1755 1716 1607 1742 0 1704 1755 1729 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.3 23.5 28.5 5.8 28.2 3.2 13.3 0.0 17.1 8.6 10.1 21.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.3 23.5 28.5 5.8 28.2 3.2 13.3 0.0 17.1 8.6 10.1 21.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.52 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 416 1892 582 319 1737 543 452 0 438 348 1174 359 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.64 0.74 0.55 0.77 0.11 0.86 0.00 0.62 0.74 0.43 0.84 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 528 2184 672 360 1924 601 605 0 565 488 1583 484 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 52.0 31.6 33.2 52.6 35.9 27.6 51.5 0.0 39.7 52.9 40.1 44.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.0 0.6 4.2 0.6 2.0 0.1 7.7 0.0 2.0 1.9 0.1 7.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.5 9.8 11.5 2.6 12.0 1.3 6.3 0.0 7.4 3.9 4.3 9.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 61.9 32.3 37.4 53.1 37.9 27.7 59.2 0.0 41.8 54.8 40.2 51.7 LnGrp LOS E C D D D C E A D D D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1978 1577 662 1063
Approach Delay, s/veh 38.4 39.1 52.0 46.9
Approach LOS D D D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.5 51.3 19.7 33.5 20.1 47.6 16.0 37.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 6.8 4.0 * 6.1 * 5.8 6.8 4.0 6.1 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.4 51.3 21.0 * 37 * 18 45.2 16.8 40.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.8 30.5 15.3 23.8 13.3 30.2 10.6 19.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 13.9 0.4 2.5 1.0 10.3 0.3 2.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 42.1
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way 01/04/2023
Cumulative + Project PM Brentwood Costco TIA 2:32 pm 12/20/2022 Cumulative 2040 with Project PM Synchro 11 Report MAR Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 497 971 116 113 985 213 188 193 48 456 658 218 Future Volume (veh/h) 497 971 116 113 985 213 188 193 48 456 658 218 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1885 1885 1885 1885 1900 1885 1900 1900 1900 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 512 1001 120 116 1015 220 194 199 49 470 678 225 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1
Cap, veh/h 577 2175 260 141 1964 613 310 321 142 722 737 328 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.47 0.47 0.08 0.38 0.38 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.21 0.21 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 3510 4650 556 1795 5147 1606 3483 3610 1599 3510 3582 1593 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 512 738 383 116 1015 220 194 199 49 470 678 225 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1755 1716 1775 1795 1716 1606 1742 1805 1599 1755 1791 1593 Q Serve(g_s), s 18.5 19.0 19.0 8.3 19.7 12.8 7.0 6.9 3.7 16.0 24.1 17.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 18.5 19.0 19.0 8.3 19.7 12.8 7.0 6.9 3.7 16.0 24.1 17.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.31 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 577 1605 830 141 1964 613 310 321 142 722 737 328 V/C Ratio(X) 0.89 0.46 0.46 0.82 0.52 0.36 0.63 0.62 0.34 0.65 0.92 0.69 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 837 1605 830 220 1964 613 541 561 249 726 741 330 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.78 0.78 0.78 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 53.1 23.5 23.5 59.0 31.0 28.8 57.1 57.1 55.7 47.3 50.6 47.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.0 0.7 1.4 7.3 1.0 1.6 2.9 2.8 2.0 2.3 16.9 6.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 8.6 7.8 8.3 4.1 8.4 5.2 3.2 3.3 1.6 7.2 12.5 7.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 58.1 24.2 24.9 66.3 31.9 30.4 60.1 59.9 57.7 49.7 67.4 54.2 LnGrp LOS E C C E C C E E E D E D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1633 1351 442 1373
Approach Delay, s/veh 35.0 34.6 59.7 59.2
Approach LOS C C E E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.2 66.6 31.8 25.4 55.4 17.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.8 5.1 4.0 5.8 5.8
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.9 46.3 26.9 31.0 31.2 20.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.3 21.0 26.1 20.5 21.7 9.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 11.6 0.6 0.8 6.3 2.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 44.1
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

Queues
11: Heidorn Ranch Road & Lone Tree Plaza 03/15/2023
Cumulative + Project PM Brentwood Costco TIA 2:32 pm 12/20/2022 Cumulative 2040 with Project PM Synchro 11 Report MAR Page 4
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 187 385 159 216 347 248
v/c Ratio 0.62 0.65 0.17 0.24 0.61 0.18
Control Delay 36.5 8.8 12.0 2.9 32.4 4.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 36.5 8.8 12.0 2.9 32.4 4.1
Stops (vph) 142 42 74 19 264 64
Fuel Used(gal) 3 2 2 2 6 2
CO Emissions (g/hr) 181 144 122 110 389 143
NOx Emissions (g/hr) 35 28 24 21 76 28
VOC Emissions (g/hr) 42 33 28 26 90 33
Dilemma Vehicles (#) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 74 0 35 0 71 27
Queue Length 95th (ft) 136 59 81 33 114 62
Internal Link Dist (ft) 392 851 819
Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 300
Base Capacity (vph) 948 1044 944 914 1267 1355
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.37 0.17 0.24 0.27 0.18
Intersection Summary
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
11: Heidorn Ranch Road & Lone Tree Plaza 03/15/2023
Cumulative + Project PM Brentwood Costco TIA 2:32 pm 12/20/2022 Cumulative 2040 with Project PM Synchro 11 Report MAR Page 5
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 163 335 0 138 188 302 216
Future Volume (vph) 163 335 0 138 188 302 216
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1615 1863 1595 3502 1900
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1615 1863 1595 3502 1900
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.92 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Adj. Flow (vph) 187 385 0 159 216 347 248
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 319 0 0 109 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 187 66 0 159 107 347 248
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0%
Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 2
Actuated Green, G (s) 11.9 11.9 34.3 34.3 11.3 49.6
Effective Green, g (s) 11.9 11.9 34.3 34.3 11.3 49.6
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.49 0.49 0.16 0.71
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 303 276 919 787 569 1355
v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.09 c0.10 c0.13
v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.07
v/c Ratio 0.62 0.24 0.17 0.14 0.61 0.18
Uniform Delay, d1 26.7 24.9 9.7 9.6 27.1 3.3
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 2.6 0.2 0.4 0.4 1.3 0.3
Delay (s) 29.3 25.1 10.2 9.9 28.3 3.6
Level of Service C C B A C A
Approach Delay (s) 26.4 10.0 18.0
Approach LOS C B B
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 19.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.36
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 69.5 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Queues
4: Heidorn Ranch Road/Fairside Way & Lone Tree Way 03/15/2023 Cumulative + Project SAT Brentwood Costco TIA 2:33 pm 12/20/2022 Cumulative 2040 with Project SAT Synchro 11 Report MAR Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 1460 679 773 367 13 509 32 13
v/c Ratio 0.05 0.67 0.77 0.32 0.65 0.06 0.81 0.20 0.14
Control Delay 50.4 32.4 53.0 21.9 56.2 51.5 15.7 58.2 46.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 50.4 32.4 53.0 21.9 56.2 51.5 15.7 58.2 46.3 Stops (vph) 10 1016 621 415 319 12 53 29 9
Fuel Used(gal) 0 43 16 11 8 0 4 1 0
CO Emissions (g/hr) 23 3025 1089 802 526 18 299 42 14
NOx Emissions (g/hr) 5 589 212 156 102 3 58 8 3
VOC Emissions (g/hr) 5 701 252 186 122 4 69 10 3
Dilemma Vehicles (#) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 7 343 304 178 144 11 0 26 6
Queue Length 95th (ft) 23 #541 m338 m377 196 30 118 60 28 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2557 951 569 264
Turn Bay Length (ft) 210 415 210 210 80
Base Capacity (vph) 262 2187 1387 2433 760 280 664 201 92 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.67 0.49 0.32 0.48 0.05 0.77 0.16 0.14 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
4: Heidorn Ranch Road/Fairside Way & Lone Tree Way 03/15/2023 Cumulative + Project SAT Brentwood Costco TIA 2:33 pm 12/20/2022 Cumulative 2040 with Project SAT Synchro 11 Report MAR Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 9 1106 281 645 705 29 349 12 484 30 7 6 Future Volume (veh/h) 9 1106 281 645 705 29 349 12 484 30 7 6 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1885 1870 1900 1885 1900 1885 1900 1885 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 1164 264 679 742 31 367 13 194 32 7 6 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Cap, veh/h 631 1822 413 825 1095 46 455 190 156 127 45 39 Arrive On Green 0.35 0.44 0.44 0.16 0.21 0.21 0.13 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.05 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 4179 948 3510 3503 146 3483 1900 1559 1810 921 789 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 9 956 472 679 379 394 367 13 194 32 0 13 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1716 1696 1755 1791 1859 1742 1900 1559 1810 0 1710 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 28.3 28.3 24.3 25.4 25.4 13.3 0.8 8.5 2.2 0.0 0.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 28.3 28.3 24.3 25.4 25.4 13.3 0.8 8.5 2.2 0.0 0.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 0.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.46
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 631 1496 739 825 560 581 455 190 156 127 0 84 V/C Ratio(X) 0.01 0.64 0.64 0.82 0.68 0.68 0.81 0.07 1.24 0.25 0.00 0.15 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 631 1496 739 1391 802 832 764 281 230 202 0 84 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.67 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.80 0.80 0.80 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.7 28.7 28.7 52.1 45.3 45.4 54.9 53.0 24.8 57.2 0.0 59.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 1.7 3.5 2.6 5.5 5.3 3.9 0.1 136.8 1.5 0.0 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 11.9 12.2 11.4 12.6 13.1 6.1 0.4 9.1 1.1 0.0 0.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 27.7 30.4 32.2 54.7 50.9 50.7 58.8 53.1 161.6 58.7 0.0 59.5 LnGrp LOS C C C D D D E D F E A E
Approach Vol, veh/h 1437 1452 574 45
Approach Delay, s/veh 31.0 52.6 93.4 58.9
Approach LOS C D F E
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 35.1 62.5 21.5 11.0 51.1 46.4 13.6 18.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 5.8 4.5 4.6 5.8 * 5.8 4.5 5.8 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 51.5 24.2 28.5 6.4 17.5 * 58 14.5 19.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 26.3 30.3 15.3 2.9 2.4 27.4 4.2 10.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.2 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 13.3 0.0 0.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 50.5
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way 01/04/2023 Cumulative + Project SAT Brentwood Costco TIA 2:33 pm 12/20/2022 Cumulative 2040 with Project SAT Synchro 11 Report MAR Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 410 1435 337 209 1341 71 461 192 109 339 616 407 Future Volume (veh/h) 410 1435 337 209 1341 71 461 192 109 339 616 407 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1885 1900 1900 1885 1900 1885 1885 1856 1900 1900 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 427 1495 351 218 1397 74 480 200 114 353 642 424 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 3 0 0 1
Cap, veh/h 497 1950 600 292 1637 511 541 283 161 406 1106 564 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.38 0.38 0.08 0.32 0.32 0.16 0.25 0.25 0.12 0.21 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 3510 5147 1583 3510 5147 1607 3483 1118 637 3510 5187 1584 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 427 1495 351 218 1397 74 480 0 314 353 642 424 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1755 1716 1583 1755 1716 1607 1742 0 1755 1755 1729 1584 Q Serve(g_s), s 15.7 33.6 23.4 8.0 33.6 4.4 17.9 0.0 21.5 13.1 14.7 28.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.7 33.6 23.4 8.0 33.6 4.4 17.9 0.0 21.5 13.1 14.7 28.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 497 1950 600 292 1637 511 541 0 444 406 1106 564 V/C Ratio(X) 0.86 0.77 0.59 0.75 0.85 0.14 0.89 0.00 0.71 0.87 0.58 0.75 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 563 2086 642 311 1705 532 740 0 500 467 1106 564 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 55.5 36.0 32.8 59.3 42.2 32.2 54.7 0.0 44.9 57.5 46.7 37.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 13.4 1.8 1.6 7.7 4.5 0.2 8.0 0.0 4.6 13.3 0.5 5.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 7.9 14.3 9.2 3.9 14.8 1.7 8.4 0.0 9.9 6.6 6.4 12.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 68.9 37.8 34.3 67.0 46.7 32.4 62.7 0.0 49.5 70.8 47.2 42.6 LnGrp LOS E D C E D C E A D E D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 2273 1689 794 1419
Approach Delay, s/veh 43.1 48.7 57.5 51.7
Approach LOS D D E D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.5 56.9 24.5 34.3 24.5 48.9 19.3 39.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.5 6.8 4.0 * 6.1 * 5.8 6.8 4.0 6.1 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.7 53.6 28.1 * 28 * 21 43.8 17.6 37.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.0 35.6 19.9 30.2 17.7 35.6 15.1 23.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 13.9 0.7 0.0 1.0 6.5 0.2 2.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 48.5
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way 01/04/2023
Cumulative + Project SAT Brentwood Costco TIA 2:33 pm 12/20/2022 Cumulative 2040 with Project SAT Synchro 11 Report MAR Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 574 1183 113 127 999 235 219 207 62 506 645 266 Future Volume (veh/h) 574 1183 113 127 999 235 219 207 62 506 645 266 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1885 1885 1885 1885 1900 1885 1900 1900 1900 1885 1885 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 592 1220 116 131 1030 242 226 213 64 522 665 274 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1
Cap, veh/h 653 2144 204 156 1803 835 280 488 357 594 819 662 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.45 0.45 0.09 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.14 0.14 0.17 0.23 0.23 Sat Flow, veh/h 3510 4772 454 1795 5147 1606 3483 3610 1603 3510 3582 1593 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 592 877 459 131 1030 242 226 213 64 522 665 274 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1755 1716 1795 1795 1716 1606 1742 1805 1603 1755 1791 1593 Q Serve(g_s), s 21.5 24.6 24.6 9.3 21.1 11.1 8.3 7.0 4.2 18.9 22.9 15.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 21.5 24.6 24.6 9.3 21.1 11.1 8.3 7.0 4.2 18.9 22.9 15.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 653 1541 806 156 1803 835 280 488 357 594 819 662 V/C Ratio(X) 0.91 0.57 0.57 0.84 0.57 0.29 0.81 0.44 0.18 0.88 0.81 0.41 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 783 1541 806 243 1803 835 335 561 389 672 934 713 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.59 0.59 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 51.8 26.5 26.5 58.4 34.3 17.7 58.8 51.7 40.9 52.7 47.5 26.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.4 0.9 1.7 8.1 1.3 0.9 11.6 0.9 0.3 12.4 5.4 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 10.1 10.2 10.9 4.6 9.1 4.3 4.1 3.3 1.7 9.3 10.8 6.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 59.2 27.4 28.2 66.6 35.6 18.5 70.4 52.5 41.3 65.1 52.9 27.5 LnGrp LOS E C C E D B E D D E D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1928 1403 503 1461
Approach Delay, s/veh 37.4 35.6 59.1 52.5
Approach LOS D D E D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.3 64.2 15.0 35.5 28.2 51.3 27.1 23.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.8 4.5 * 5.8 4.0 5.8 5.1 5.8 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.6 46.6 12.5 * 34 29.0 35.2 24.9 20.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.3 26.6 10.3 24.9 23.5 23.1 20.9 9.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 12.1 0.2 4.7 0.7 7.7 1.1 1.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 43.1
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Queues
11: Heidorn Ranch Road & Lone Tree Plaza 03/15/2023
Cumulative + Project SAT Brentwood Costco TIA 2:33 pm 12/20/2022 Cumulative 2040 with Project SAT Synchro 11 Report MAR Page 4
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 221 517 160 241 518 236
v/c Ratio 0.66 0.72 0.19 0.28 0.72 0.18
Control Delay 39.5 9.0 15.8 3.5 35.2 4.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 39.5 9.0 15.8 3.5 35.2 4.8
Stops (vph) 168 50 83 21 397 63
Fuel Used(gal) 3 3 2 2 9 2
CO Emissions (g/hr) 222 193 134 125 601 139
NOx Emissions (g/hr) 43 38 26 24 117 27
VOC Emissions (g/hr) 51 45 31 29 139 32
Dilemma Vehicles (#) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 97 0 43 0 118 30
Queue Length 95th (ft) 172 65 102 41 180 72
Internal Link Dist (ft) 392 851 819
Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 300
Base Capacity (vph) 864 1053 860 866 1155 1341
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.26 0.49 0.19 0.28 0.45 0.18
Intersection Summary
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
11: Heidorn Ranch Road & Lone Tree Plaza 03/15/2023
Cumulative + Project SAT Brentwood Costco TIA 2:33 pm 12/20/2022 Cumulative 2040 with Project SAT Synchro 11 Report MAR Page 5
Movement WBL WBR NBU NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 192 450 0 139 210 451 205
Future Volume (vph) 192 450 0 139 210 451 205
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1615 1863 1595 3502 1900
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1615 1863 1595 3502 1900
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.92 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Adj. Flow (vph) 221 517 0 160 241 518 236
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 420 0 0 133 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 221 97 0 160 108 518 236
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 0% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0%
Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 2
Actuated Green, G (s) 14.4 14.4 34.4 34.4 15.7 54.1
Effective Green, g (s) 14.4 14.4 34.4 34.4 15.7 54.1
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.45 0.45 0.21 0.71
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 333 304 837 717 718 1343
v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 c0.09 c0.15 0.12
v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.07
v/c Ratio 0.66 0.32 0.19 0.15 0.72 0.18
Uniform Delay, d1 28.8 26.8 12.7 12.4 28.4 3.7
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 3.8 0.2 0.5 0.4 3.0 0.3
Delay (s) 32.6 27.0 13.2 12.9 31.4 4.0
Level of Service C C B B C A
Approach Delay (s) 28.7 13.0 22.8
Approach LOS C B C
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 23.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.43
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 76.5 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Appendix J -
Canada Valley
Road & Lone Tree
Way SimTraffic
Reports
SimTraffic Simulation Summary
01/06/2023
Cumulative PM SimTraffic Report

Page 1 ends

Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Start Time 3:50 3:50 3:50 3:50 3:50 3:50 3:50
End Time 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00
Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70 70 70 70
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 9496 9490 9544 9443 9322 9042 9042
Vehs Exited 9492 9376 9463 9307 9262 8908 8559
Starting Vehs 527 469 483 438 470 421 403
Ending Vehs 531 583 564 574 530 555 886
Travel Distance (mi) 5549 5526 5581 5454 5569 5364 5071 Travel Time (hr) 513.8 624.0 622.7 627.9 685.3 719.8 837.6 Total Delay (hr) 358.4 469.2 466.4 475.1 529.5 569.7 695.1 Total Stops 18755 19449 19612 19143 19179 19702 19667
Fuel Used (gal) 319.1 342.4 342.9 339.9 356.7 354.7 373.3 Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Start Time 3:50 3:50 3:50 3:50
End Time 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00
Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 9334 9326 9398 9346
Vehs Exited 9100 9094 9248 9180
Starting Vehs 397 419 404 440
Ending Vehs 631 651 554 603
Travel Distance (mi) 5445 5442 5472 5447
Travel Time (hr) 600.8 643.9 661.4 653.7
Total Delay (hr) 448.2 491.6 507.8 501.1
Total Stops 18782 19640 19716 19366
Fuel Used (gal) 333.6 342.4 347.9 345.3
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 3:50
End Time 4:00
Total Time (min) 10
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.

No data recorded this interval.

SimTraffic Simulation Summary
01/06/2023
Cumulative PM SimTraffic Report

Page 2 ends

Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 4:00
End Time 5:00
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.

Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Vehs Entered 9496 9490 9544 9443 9322 9042 9042
Vehs Exited 9492 9376 9463 9307 9262 8908 8559
Starting Vehs 527 469 483 438 470 421 403
Ending Vehs 531 583 564 574 530 555 886
Travel Distance (mi) 5549 5526 5581 5454 5569 5364 5071 Travel Time (hr) 513.8 624.0 622.7 627.9 685.3 719.8 837.6 Total Delay (hr) 358.4 469.2 466.4 475.1 529.5 569.7 695.1 Total Stops 18755 19449 19612 19143 19179 19702 19667
Fuel Used (gal) 319.1 342.4 342.9 339.9 356.7 354.7 373.3 Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 4:00
End Time 5:00
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.

Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Vehs Entered 9334 9326 9398 9346
Vehs Exited 9100 9094 9248 9180
Starting Vehs 397 419 404 440
Ending Vehs 631 651 554 603
Travel Distance (mi) 5445 5442 5472 5447
Travel Time (hr) 600.8 643.9 661.4 653.7
Total Delay (hr) 448.2 491.6 507.8 501.1
Total Stops 18782 19640 19716 19366
Fuel Used (gal) 333.6 342.4 347.9 345.3
SimTraffic Performance Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative PM SimTraffic Report

Page 3 ends

1: Canada Valley Road & Country Hills Drive Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 2.8 0.2 0.2 4.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.2 9.6 2.9 4.3 8.5 2.0 8.2 10.0 3.6 10.2 4.3 7.6 2: Canada Valley Road & Bella Rose/Lowes Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 4.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 22.8 6.6 14.1 3.2 14.3 5.3 2.4 14.0 9.7 4.0 8.0 5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 2.6 0.5 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 2.2 1.1 2.6 Total Del/Veh (s) 84.2 53.8 12.3 153.1 20.1 9.3 68.8 75.3 37.3 85.7 76.6 49.6 5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5
Total Del/Veh (s) 56.7
6: SR-4/SR-4 SB Off-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 1.1 0.9 0.2 0.1 11.6 23.0 10.8 3.6
Total Del/Veh (s) 47.1 18.1 63.6 17.8 60.7 67.1 33.1 37.3 7: Jeffrey Way/SR-4 NB On-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.7 1.0 0.5 0.2
Total Del/Veh (s) 28.6 12.0 63.8 14.0 17.8 47.4 47.1 31.2 25.1 8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.4 0.1 1.1 0.2 0.3 92.9 88.1 91.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 112.0 56.6 20.5 67.2 65.6 14.3 71.7 40.1 36.6 157.5 55.6 49.3 8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 17.2
Total Del/Veh (s) 63.0
SimTraffic Performance Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative PM SimTraffic Report

Page 4 ends

9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 30.8 24.8 19.2 2.4 0.4 2.4 5.0 2.1 1.4 202.6 204.4 207.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 317.2 32.2 11.9 69.2 49.3 10.5 66.9 85.0 9.0 106.8 167.7 179.2 9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 69.0
Total Del/Veh (s) 99.0
44: Canada Valley Road Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 3.7 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 12.3 11.8 4.2 10.2 16.2 6.3 11.8 10.1 7.8 0.7 1.2 2.8 44: Canada Valley Road Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1
Total Del/Veh (s) 5.7
Total Network Performance
Denied Del/Veh (s) 44.0
Total Del/Veh (s) 140.8
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative PM SimTraffic Report

Page 5 ends

Intersection: 1: Canada Valley Road & Country Hills Drive Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR L T R TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 21 64 50 25 102 118 53 77
Average Queue (ft) 1 33 22 12 45 50 26 41
95th Queue (ft) 9 50 39 28 77 87 45 65
Link Distance (ft) 355 761 394 394 398
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 200 85
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 1 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1 0
Intersection: 2: Canada Valley Road & Bella Rose/Lowes
Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR L TR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 40 95 52 48 154 94 34 169 88
Average Queue (ft) 13 46 13 14 56 23 9 48 21
95th Queue (ft) 38 79 41 41 117 65 32 135 68
Link Distance (ft) 264 240 311 311 394 394
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 90 115
Storage Blk Time (%) 3 0 2 3
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 0 0
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative PM SimTraffic Report

Page 6 ends

Intersection: 5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 114 304 554 588 619 139 450 500 758 540 314 200 Average Queue (ft) 40 34 280 287 333 28 344 377 293 159 151 60 95th Queue (ft) 88 176 509 522 568 130 517 558 771 391 285 141 Link Distance (ft) 841 841 841 768 768 768
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 0 1 5 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 29 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 315 315 630 400 400 255
Storage Blk Time (%) 11 2 16 22 1 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 1 48 68 4 5 0
Intersection: 5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way
Movement NB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L TR R L L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 108 123 252 239 250 323 281
Average Queue (ft) 23 58 134 112 147 200 118
95th Queue (ft) 76 107 228 206 262 320 234
Link Distance (ft) 262 262 262 311 311
Upstream Blk Time (%) 2 1 5 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 1 11 2
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 150
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 12 12 34
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 4 20 55
Intersection: 6: SR-4/SR-4 SB Off-Ramp & Lone Tree Way
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB SB SB SB
Directions Served T T T R L L T T T L LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 552 560 576 436 130 266 473 368 333 450 742 584 Average Queue (ft) 305 299 332 171 53 75 185 127 146 328 413 236 95th Queue (ft) 550 556 592 389 102 183 403 259 262 465 660 546 Link Distance (ft) 768 768 768 708 708 708 887 887
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 1 1 1 0 0 3 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 6 8 4 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 240 240 350
Storage Blk Time (%) 3 6 5 17
Queuing Penalty (veh) 15 8 25 78
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative PM SimTraffic Report

Page 7 ends

Intersection: 7: Jeffrey Way/SR-4 NB On-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB
Directions Served T T T R L L T T T R L LT
Maximum Queue (ft) 535 543 533 267 46 68 269 220 303 248 296 386 Average Queue (ft) 264 254 272 89 13 26 99 72 98 131 170 216 95th Queue (ft) 559 555 555 258 39 59 214 167 229 259 275 333 Link Distance (ft) 708 708 708 1253 1253 1253 385
Upstream Blk Time (%) 4 2 1 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 36 14 10 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 210 315 315 150 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 12 0 1 7 3 13
Queuing Penalty (veh) 38 0 10 25 7 32
Intersection: 7: Jeffrey Way/SR-4 NB On-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Movement NB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft) 283
Average Queue (ft) 96
95th Queue (ft) 198
Link Distance (ft) 385
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative PM SimTraffic Report

Page 8 ends

Intersection: 8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 238 448 1078 1062 1029 298 140 191 585 692 770 452 Average Queue (ft) 119 254 563 432 372 118 65 82 265 352 483 66 95th Queue (ft) 204 537 1271 1072 916 233 117 149 506 641 771 339 Link Distance (ft) 1253 1253 1253 1170 1170 1170
Upstream Blk Time (%) 8 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 62 4 1
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 400 400 355 450 450 600
Storage Blk Time (%) 34 1 0 8 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 109 3 0 5 0
Intersection: 8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Movement NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 307 368 170 253 285 334 357 363
Average Queue (ft) 148 218 67 80 171 194 238 242
95th Queue (ft) 266 324 133 201 316 356 402 411
Link Distance (ft) 435 435 435 343 343 343
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 17 3 6
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 215 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 15 35 6
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 27 43 7
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative PM SimTraffic Report

Page 9 ends

Intersection: 9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB
Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R L L
Maximum Queue (ft) 550 1186 1150 768 106 224 343 348 365 207 178 271 Average Queue (ft) 547 1029 315 204 36 100 228 210 223 58 56 120 95th Queue (ft) 572 1466 888 473 81 185 333 315 335 130 132 242 Link Distance (ft) 1170 1170 1170 1253 1253 1253
Upstream Blk Time (%) 21 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 105 5 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 450 450 435 300 225 225
Storage Blk Time (%) 80 0 2 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 249 0 4 0 0
Intersection: 9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way
Movement NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served T R L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 341 98 287 350 600 609
Average Queue (ft) 174 23 164 332 574 576
95th Queue (ft) 348 124 268 418 678 665
Link Distance (ft) 483 483 574 574
Upstream Blk Time (%) 2 0 50 55
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250
Storage Blk Time (%) 10 1 4 70
Queuing Penalty (veh) 18 2 15 320
Intersection: 44: Canada Valley Road
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 109 54 32 90 26 56 128 18 36 117
Average Queue (ft) 49 22 8 39 2 23 64 1 2 6
95th Queue (ft) 86 48 29 68 12 48 109 9 21 51
Link Distance (ft) 124 124 166 166 251 251 262 262
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 85 90
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 1565
SimTraffic Simulation Summary
01/06/2023
Cumulative SAT SimTraffic Report

Page 1 ends

Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Start Time 11:50 11:50 11:50 11:50 11:50 11:50 11:50
End Time 1:00 1:00 1:00 1:00 1:00 1:00 1:00
Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70 70 70 70
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 10372 10256 10183 10258 9918 10592 10303
Vehs Exited 10087 9811 9706 10063 9505 10195 9861
Starting Vehs 479 510 479 594 492 475 491
Ending Vehs 764 955 956 789 905 872 933
Travel Distance (mi) 5849 5702 5649 5893 5500 5929 5681 Travel Time (hr) 757.3 1008.8 965.8 992.3 1094.2 993.9 1155.3 Total Delay (hr) 592.0 848.5 806.9 826.4 939.5 827.3 995.4 Total Stops 22733 24833 23434 24502 24150 26486 24922
Fuel Used (gal) 383.8 435.1 422.6 437.6 447.8 439.0 467.3 Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Start Time 11:50 11:50 11:50 11:50
End Time 1:00 1:00 1:00 1:00
Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 10353 10470 10513 10322
Vehs Exited 10008 10215 10180 9961
Starting Vehs 561 509 466 498
Ending Vehs 906 764 799 858
Travel Distance (mi) 5857 5912 5921 5789
Travel Time (hr) 1136.4 847.9 840.2 979.2
Total Delay (hr) 971.2 680.7 673.3 816.1
Total Stops 25148 23905 23281 24341
Fuel Used (gal) 470.2 406.7 403.9 431.4
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 11:50
End Time 12:00
Total Time (min) 10
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.

No data recorded this interval.

SimTraffic Simulation Summary
01/06/2023
Cumulative SAT SimTraffic Report

Page 2 ends

Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 12:00
End Time 1:00
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.

Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Vehs Entered 10372 10256 10183 10258 9918 10592 10303
Vehs Exited 10087 9811 9706 10063 9505 10195 9861
Starting Vehs 479 510 479 594 492 475 491
Ending Vehs 764 955 956 789 905 872 933
Travel Distance (mi) 5849 5702 5649 5893 5500 5929 5681 Travel Time (hr) 757.3 1008.8 965.8 992.3 1094.2 993.9 1155.3 Total Delay (hr) 592.0 848.5 806.9 826.4 939.5 827.3 995.4 Total Stops 22733 24833 23434 24502 24150 26486 24922
Fuel Used (gal) 383.8 435.1 422.6 437.6 447.8 439.0 467.3 Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 12:00
End Time 1:00
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.

Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Vehs Entered 10353 10470 10513 10322
Vehs Exited 10008 10215 10180 9961
Starting Vehs 561 509 466 498
Ending Vehs 906 764 799 858
Travel Distance (mi) 5857 5912 5921 5789
Travel Time (hr) 1136.4 847.9 840.2 979.2
Total Delay (hr) 971.2 680.7 673.3 816.1
Total Stops 25148 23905 23281 24341
Fuel Used (gal) 470.2 406.7 403.9 431.4
SimTraffic Performance Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative SAT SimTraffic Report

Page 3 ends

1: Canada Valley Road & Country Hills Drive Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.7 0.2 0.2 4.0 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.6 12.0 7.1 12.0 8.7 2.2 8.4 10.0 4.2 24.5 11.9 1: Canada Valley Road & Country Hills Drive Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.8
Total Del/Veh (s) 12.7
2: Canada Valley Road & Bella Rose/Lowes Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 37.3 69.1 32.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 40.7 32.6 36.5 42.8 13.4 8.9 26.2 10.0 4.6 47.8 38.3 25.5 2: Canada Valley Road & Bella Rose/Lowes Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 9.5
Total Del/Veh (s) 27.6
5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 6.0 4.3 7.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 2.1 2.0 1.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 89.0 78.0 13.0 155.0 22.9 9.5 65.4 57.4 42.8 103.9 106.1 82.6 5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 1.7
Total Del/Veh (s) 68.1
6: SR-4/SR-4 SB Off-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.1 3.4 1.2 0.4 51.1 92.7 51.8 16.5
Total Del/Veh (s) 64.7 20.0 68.0 27.7 66.6 70.9 69.1 50.8 7: Jeffrey Way/SR-4 NB On-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.9 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 7.8 8.8 6.8 1.5
Total Del/Veh (s) 52.6 22.4 55.4 19.1 19.8 34.8 31.9 29.0 36.2 SimTraffic Performance Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative SAT SimTraffic Report

Page 4 ends

8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.3 48.9 45.9 45.3 43.7 39.9 258.9 251.6 248.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 142.7 67.9 20.2 75.0 129.6 79.2 142.7 41.9 30.8 152.2 69.9 77.8 8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 74.6
Total Del/Veh (s) 92.7
9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.4 2.4 72.8 66.4 57.7 315.0 312.6 315.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 282.2 33.1 11.9 68.6 60.7 15.7 135.8 196.5 14.2 106.3 167.6 185.5 9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 98.8
Total Del/Veh (s) 106.3
44: Canada Valley Road Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.9 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 5.0 1.9 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 19.2 13.9 8.9 11.9 19.0 13.6 15.0 19.0 17.5 0.7 0.9 1.5 44: Canada Valley Road Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.7
Total Del/Veh (s) 9.4
Total Network Performance
Denied Del/Veh (s) 94.5
Total Del/Veh (s) 175.0
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative SAT SimTraffic Report

Page 5 ends

Intersection: 1: Canada Valley Road & Country Hills Drive Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR L T R L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 24 85 78 46 98 112 60 8 189
Average Queue (ft) 4 35 28 9 44 48 30 0 70
95th Queue (ft) 17 70 68 35 79 86 50 6 201
Link Distance (ft) 355 761 394 394 398
Upstream Blk Time (%) 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 200 85 50
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 0 0 0 1 11
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 1 0
Intersection: 2: Canada Valley Road & Bella Rose/Lowes
Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR L TR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 48 169 248 93 176 117 91 323 282
Average Queue (ft) 12 102 76 29 68 44 14 117 83
95th Queue (ft) 40 181 239 68 137 93 73 311 256
Link Distance (ft) 264 240 311 311 394 394
Upstream Blk Time (%) 16 6 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 12 5
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 90 115
Storage Blk Time (%) 29 0 0 4 18
Queuing Penalty (veh) 11 0 0 1 2
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative SAT SimTraffic Report

Page 6 ends

Intersection: 5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 110 382 798 801 819 469 450 500 781 646 321 177 Average Queue (ft) 45 63 352 366 414 64 331 362 355 171 155 55 95th Queue (ft) 95 233 663 681 734 318 527 576 870 418 284 126 Link Distance (ft) 841 841 841 768 768 768
Upstream Blk Time (%) 2 2 4 9 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 63 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 315 315 630 400 400 255
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 17 8 23 29 0 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 13 7 74 96 1 2
Intersection: 5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way
Movement NB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L TR R L L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 105 128 268 267 250 330 330
Average Queue (ft) 28 62 172 157 183 245 212
95th Queue (ft) 80 113 273 261 290 367 359
Link Distance (ft) 262 262 262 311 311
Upstream Blk Time (%) 4 3 19 12
Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 5 58 38
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 150
Storage Blk Time (%) 2 14 26 51
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 7 51 100
Intersection: 6: SR-4/SR-4 SB Off-Ramp & Lone Tree Way
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB SB SB SB
Directions Served T T T R L L T T T L LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 712 701 738 534 149 318 494 365 348 450 867 856 Average Queue (ft) 372 368 385 227 70 116 254 186 191 333 518 438 95th Queue (ft) 694 693 712 545 127 280 531 369 349 499 942 966 Link Distance (ft) 768 768 768 708 708 708 887 887
Upstream Blk Time (%) 2 2 3 4 0 0 15 12
Queuing Penalty (veh) 15 15 20 20 1 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 240 240 350
Storage Blk Time (%) 10 1 0 14 12 21
Queuing Penalty (veh) 60 4 0 29 61 106
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative SAT SimTraffic Report

Page 7 ends

Intersection: 7: Jeffrey Way/SR-4 NB On-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB
Directions Served T T T R L L T T T R L LT
Maximum Queue (ft) 737 744 745 310 61 107 371 301 447 250 255 313 Average Queue (ft) 463 442 435 185 18 43 148 106 122 160 124 167 95th Queue (ft) 814 803 791 397 49 150 375 295 311 267 227 284 Link Distance (ft) 708 708 708 1253 1253 1253 385
Upstream Blk Time (%) 10 5 4 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 88 42 39 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 210 315 315 150 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 27 3 1 9 3 4
Queuing Penalty (veh) 87 2 11 37 7 9
Intersection: 7: Jeffrey Way/SR-4 NB On-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Movement NB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft) 268
Average Queue (ft) 100
95th Queue (ft) 212
Link Distance (ft) 385
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative SAT SimTraffic Report

Page 8 ends

Intersection: 8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 300 500 1262 1259 1196 352 198 302 1080 1129 1155 700 Average Queue (ft) 175 354 742 602 518 96 83 107 543 772 917 377 95th Queue (ft) 322 619 1468 1257 1103 246 154 210 1076 1294 1348 932 Link Distance (ft) 1253 1253 1253 1170 1170 1170
Upstream Blk Time (%) 11 1 0 0 0 6
Queuing Penalty (veh) 100 9 3 0 2 27
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 400 400 355 450 450 600
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 2 44 3 0 0 64 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 10 181 10 0 0 46 2
Intersection: 8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Movement NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 315 462 390 292 299 356 360 384
Average Queue (ft) 271 379 187 80 203 248 285 314
95th Queue (ft) 388 537 457 209 344 410 462 487
Link Distance (ft) 435 435 435 343 343 343
Upstream Blk Time (%) 38 6 0 25 15 47
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 215 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 17 66 42 16
Queuing Penalty (veh) 38 147 71 27
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative SAT SimTraffic Report

Page 9 ends

Intersection: 9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB
Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R L L
Maximum Queue (ft) 550 1184 1128 446 104 242 381 515 531 267 242 321 Average Queue (ft) 539 1007 320 195 31 113 239 243 268 89 106 224 95th Queue (ft) 602 1529 880 380 72 204 361 460 505 252 217 399 Link Distance (ft) 1170 1170 1170 1253 1253 1253
Upstream Blk Time (%) 18 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 111 3 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 450 450 435 300 225 225
Storage Blk Time (%) 75 0 10 4 7
Queuing Penalty (veh) 282 0 24 8 14
Intersection: 9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way
Movement NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served T R L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 475 315 294 350 595 607
Average Queue (ft) 354 70 171 333 579 580
95th Queue (ft) 607 301 282 418 658 645
Link Distance (ft) 483 483 574 574
Upstream Blk Time (%) 32 1 52 56
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250
Storage Blk Time (%) 54 1 6 71
Queuing Penalty (veh) 118 4 21 360
Intersection: 44: Canada Valley Road
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 116 98 32 103 33 148 237 16 25 61
Average Queue (ft) 53 36 6 45 8 42 113 1 1 3
95th Queue (ft) 95 74 24 85 28 117 212 7 14 27
Link Distance (ft) 124 124 166 166 251 251 262 262
Upstream Blk Time (%) 2 0 0 1 3
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 85 90
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 2836
SimTraffic Simulation Summary
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project PM SimTraffic Report

Page 1 ends

Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Start Time 3:50 3:50 3:50 3:50 3:50 3:50 3:50
End Time 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00
Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70 70 70 70
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 9876 9829 10198 9677 9597 10123 10154
Vehs Exited 9651 9654 9879 9322 9040 9821 9819
Starting Vehs 527 479 463 515 448 578 503
Ending Vehs 752 654 782 870 1005 880 838
Travel Distance (mi) 5712 5747 5789 5537 5388 5797 5800 Travel Time (hr) 908.7 835.1 795.8 1028.6 1116.5 863.3 821.2 Total Delay (hr) 747.7 673.2 632.8 873.0 965.1 699.7 657.9 Total Stops 23534 22459 22728 23792 23304 23327 22529
Fuel Used (gal) 412.5 397.0 391.7 432.3 447.3 407.1 396.1 Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Start Time 3:50 3:50 3:50 3:50
End Time 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00
Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 10024 9703 9801 9901
Vehs Exited 9623 9271 9667 9574
Starting Vehs 540 486 564 512
Ending Vehs 941 918 698 830
Travel Distance (mi) 5722 5408 5651 5655
Travel Time (hr) 962.8 966.2 1116.7 941.5
Total Delay (hr) 802.2 813.8 956.7 782.2
Total Stops 24809 22372 22700 23156
Fuel Used (gal) 424.8 416.9 461.5 418.7
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 3:50
End Time 4:00
Total Time (min) 10
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.

No data recorded this interval.

SimTraffic Simulation Summary
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project PM SimTraffic Report

Page 2 ends

Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 4:00
End Time 5:00
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.

Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Vehs Entered 9876 9829 10198 9677 9597 10123 10154
Vehs Exited 9651 9654 9879 9322 9040 9821 9819
Starting Vehs 527 479 463 515 448 578 503
Ending Vehs 752 654 782 870 1005 880 838
Travel Distance (mi) 5712 5747 5789 5537 5388 5797 5800 Travel Time (hr) 908.7 835.1 795.8 1028.6 1116.5 863.3 821.2 Total Delay (hr) 747.7 673.2 632.8 873.0 965.1 699.7 657.9 Total Stops 23534 22459 22728 23792 23304 23327 22529
Fuel Used (gal) 412.5 397.0 391.7 432.3 447.3 407.1 396.1 Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 4:00
End Time 5:00
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.

Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Vehs Entered 10024 9703 9801 9901
Vehs Exited 9623 9271 9667 9574
Starting Vehs 540 486 564 512
Ending Vehs 941 918 698 830
Travel Distance (mi) 5722 5408 5651 5655
Travel Time (hr) 962.8 966.2 1116.7 941.5
Total Delay (hr) 802.2 813.8 956.7 782.2
Total Stops 24809 22372 22700 23156
Fuel Used (gal) 424.8 416.9 461.5 418.7
SimTraffic Performance Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project PM SimTraffic Report

Page 3 ends

1: Canada Valley Road & Country Hills Drive Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.6 0.2 0.2 4.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.6 11.8 4.9 4.8 9.1 1.3 8.8 10.4 3.4 13.0 6.7 8.9 2: Canada Valley Road & Bella Rose/Lowes Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 3.9 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 13.5 5.5 16.0 3.8 14.0 4.7 2.1 19.5 10.9 2.4 8.5 5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 112.0 112.3 117.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 1.8 0.8 0.9 Total Del/Veh (s) 93.4 146.7 39.2 216.1 23.6 9.4 60.3 79.7 46.3 89.3 79.1 57.8 5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 37.4
Total Del/Veh (s) 94.3
6: SR-4/SR-4 SB Off-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 1.3 1.3 16.5 10.4 65.5 60.5 67.3 22.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 54.0 22.3 115.4 51.7 67.7 74.8 134.3 61.5 7: Jeffrey Way/SR-4 NB On-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 145.4 137.2 142.8 23.7 Total Del/Veh (s) 39.3 18.7 111.3 57.6 21.9 87.1 61.6 32.0 44.9 8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 5.3 8.3 14.7 18.0 13.4 113.5 114.2 115.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 108.8 58.3 22.5 71.8 81.8 22.6 85.5 40.1 27.4 150.8 60.1 59.5 8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 24.8
Total Del/Veh (s) 68.9
SimTraffic Performance Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project PM SimTraffic Report

Page 4 ends

9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 32.4 24.5 17.3 2.3 0.4 2.4 4.0 1.2 0.7 239.7 232.1 237.8 Total Del/Veh (s) 310.7 30.2 11.0 77.1 51.6 10.7 71.1 82.0 9.4 109.3 170.5 184.6 9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 77.2
Total Del/Veh (s) 98.4
44: Canada Valley Road Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 7.3 5.7 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 24.1 17.0 10.9 12.8 21.1 14.1 14.0 28.1 30.4 0.7 0.9 1.7 44: Canada Valley Road Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 2.0
Total Del/Veh (s) 13.3
Total Network Performance
Denied Del/Veh (s) 86.8
Total Del/Veh (s) 182.2
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project PM SimTraffic Report

Page 5 ends

Intersection: 1: Canada Valley Road & Country Hills Drive Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR L T R TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 23 78 47 26 95 126 59 114
Average Queue (ft) 1 36 22 13 42 54 27 49
95th Queue (ft) 11 68 36 29 73 96 49 107
Link Distance (ft) 355 761 394 394 398
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 200 85
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 1 1 4
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 2 2 0
Intersection: 2: Canada Valley Road & Bella Rose/Lowes
Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR L TR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 43 96 67 61 135 61 54 194 117
Average Queue (ft) 13 44 16 15 49 17 10 49 30
95th Queue (ft) 38 83 64 45 106 48 40 152 119
Link Distance (ft) 264 240 311 311 394 394
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 1 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 2
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 90 115
Storage Blk Time (%) 3 0 1 4
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 0 0
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project PM SimTraffic Report

Page 6 ends

Intersection: 5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 92 378 854 864 874 730 450 500 795 563 343 229 Average Queue (ft) 34 57 634 699 736 392 428 476 652 175 178 61 95th Queue (ft) 79 266 1009 1055 1054 965 518 575 1091 378 315 152 Link Distance (ft) 841 841 841 768 768 768
Upstream Blk Time (%) 6 24 50 29 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 220 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 315 315 630 400 400 255
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 34 61 52 66 0 3
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 18 64 182 232 1 10
Intersection: 5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way
Movement NB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L TR R L L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 122 146 278 276 250 322 303
Average Queue (ft) 42 75 206 195 152 203 149
95th Queue (ft) 104 130 298 304 270 326 275
Link Distance (ft) 262 262 262 311 311
Upstream Blk Time (%) 6 6 6 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 15 14 14 2
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 150
Storage Blk Time (%) 4 20 14 36
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 13 23 59
Intersection: 6: SR-4/SR-4 SB Off-Ramp & Lone Tree Way
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB SB SB SB
Directions Served T T T R L L T T T L LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 590 625 705 538 131 340 753 750 732 450 904 914 Average Queue (ft) 354 368 418 243 50 213 568 364 271 328 619 647 95th Queue (ft) 613 638 685 496 110 454 961 839 683 488 1054 1086 Link Distance (ft) 768 768 768 708 708 708 887 887
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 1 2 37 5 1 18 22
Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 8 12 218 28 5 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 240 240 350
Storage Blk Time (%) 5 0 61 5 18
Queuing Penalty (veh) 36 2 90 23 83
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project PM SimTraffic Report

Page 7 ends

Intersection: 7: Jeffrey Way/SR-4 NB On-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB
Directions Served T T T R L L T T T R L LT
Maximum Queue (ft) 663 668 700 310 57 309 990 921 834 250 300 410 Average Queue (ft) 325 315 335 153 15 68 391 323 281 148 257 332 95th Queue (ft) 627 623 647 352 42 278 1000 909 804 277 351 471 Link Distance (ft) 708 708 708 1253 1253 1253 385
Upstream Blk Time (%) 4 1 2 4 0 0 36
Queuing Penalty (veh) 31 12 16 24 2 1 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 210 315 315 150 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 22 0 30 6 9 46 22
Queuing Penalty (veh) 103 0 13 45 34 157 70
Intersection: 7: Jeffrey Way/SR-4 NB On-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Movement NB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft) 402
Average Queue (ft) 159
95th Queue (ft) 396
Link Distance (ft) 385
Upstream Blk Time (%) 8
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project PM SimTraffic Report

Page 8 ends

Intersection: 8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 234 473 1102 1086 1028 303 141 233 691 798 859 570 Average Queue (ft) 117 246 550 425 351 121 72 111 317 421 555 103 95th Queue (ft) 205 531 1217 1028 839 244 126 276 664 816 935 467 Link Distance (ft) 1253 1253 1253 1170 1170 1170
Upstream Blk Time (%) 6 1 0 0 0 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 46 6 1 0 0 5
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 400 400 355 450 450 600
Storage Blk Time (%) 35 1 0 0 5 17 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 112 4 1 0 8 10 0
Intersection: 8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Movement NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 302 376 171 234 268 336 355 367
Average Queue (ft) 168 233 70 74 158 187 235 253
95th Queue (ft) 307 377 180 173 314 357 406 427
Link Distance (ft) 435 435 435 343 343 343
Upstream Blk Time (%) 4 1 0 16 4 12
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 215 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 7 22 33 8
Queuing Penalty (veh) 12 42 41 10
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project PM SimTraffic Report

Page 9 ends

Intersection: 9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB
Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R L L
Maximum Queue (ft) 550 1184 1159 587 100 251 370 352 374 199 192 279 Average Queue (ft) 539 983 266 174 31 113 248 228 238 61 66 116 95th Queue (ft) 615 1503 784 391 72 210 358 336 359 150 149 227 Link Distance (ft) 1170 1170 1170 1253 1253 1253
Upstream Blk Time (%) 20 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 105 1 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 450 450 435 300 225 225
Storage Blk Time (%) 76 0 0 4 0 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 246 0 0 8 0 1
Intersection: 9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way
Movement NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served T R L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 354 50 291 350 601 611
Average Queue (ft) 162 15 164 328 569 571
95th Queue (ft) 328 36 278 421 686 676
Link Distance (ft) 483 483 574 574
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 50 58
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250
Storage Blk Time (%) 8 2 6 71
Queuing Penalty (veh) 16 6 19 322
Intersection: 44: Canada Valley Road
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 134 64 30 108 21 252 280 29 42 57
Average Queue (ft) 58 25 9 44 2 71 175 2 2 3
95th Queue (ft) 109 54 30 81 14 208 296 15 19 25
Link Distance (ft) 124 124 166 166 251 251 262 262
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 0 4 14
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 85 90
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 2920
SimTraffic Simulation Summary
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project SAT SimTraffic Report

Page 1 ends

Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Start Time 11:50 11:50 11:50 11:50 11:50 11:50 11:50
End Time 1:00 1:00 1:00 1:00 1:00 1:00 1:00
Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70 70 70 70
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 10926 10297 10711 10339 10937 10342 10963
Vehs Exited 10549 10225 10227 10102 10676 9951 10447
Starting Vehs 645 590 565 654 605 573 630
Ending Vehs 1022 662 1049 891 866 964 1146
Travel Distance (mi) 6006 5761 5887 5808 6048 5799 6018 Travel Time (hr) 1250.0 1418.5 1416.6 1514.0 1239.5 1426.8 1383.8 Total Delay (hr) 1079.2 1255.0 1249.8 1349.4 1067.6 1262.8 1212.7 Total Stops 28441 24888 27011 26575 24964 27091 28419
Fuel Used (gal) 503.1 534.3 536.9 554.6 504.1 535.1 533.3 Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Start Time 11:50 11:50 11:50 11:50
End Time 1:00 1:00 1:00 1:00
Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 10631 10504 9590 10523
Vehs Exited 10282 10081 9208 10173
Starting Vehs 587 565 592 604
Ending Vehs 936 988 974 940
Travel Distance (mi) 5838 5878 5311 5835
Travel Time (hr) 1379.9 1457.0 1799.6 1428.6
Total Delay (hr) 1213.3 1289.6 1649.1 1262.9
Total Stops 26683 29281 25187 26855
Fuel Used (gal) 527.6 542.2 602.2 537.3
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 11:50
End Time 12:00
Total Time (min) 10
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.

No data recorded this interval.

SimTraffic Simulation Summary
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project SAT SimTraffic Report

Page 2 ends

Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 12:00
End Time 1:00
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.

Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Vehs Entered 10926 10297 10711 10339 10937 10342 10963
Vehs Exited 10549 10225 10227 10102 10676 9951 10447
Starting Vehs 645 590 565 654 605 573 630
Ending Vehs 1022 662 1049 891 866 964 1146
Travel Distance (mi) 6006 5761 5887 5808 6048 5799 6018 Travel Time (hr) 1250.0 1418.5 1416.6 1514.0 1239.5 1426.8 1383.8 Total Delay (hr) 1079.2 1255.0 1249.8 1349.4 1067.6 1262.8 1212.7 Total Stops 28441 24888 27011 26575 24964 27091 28419
Fuel Used (gal) 503.1 534.3 536.9 554.6 504.1 535.1 533.3 Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 12:00
End Time 1:00
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.

Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Vehs Entered 10631 10504 9590 10523
Vehs Exited 10282 10081 9208 10173
Starting Vehs 587 565 592 604
Ending Vehs 936 988 974 940
Travel Distance (mi) 5838 5878 5311 5835
Travel Time (hr) 1379.9 1457.0 1799.6 1428.6
Total Delay (hr) 1213.3 1289.6 1649.1 1262.9
Total Stops 26683 29281 25187 26855
Fuel Used (gal) 527.6 542.2 602.2 537.3
SimTraffic Performance Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project SAT SimTraffic Report

Page 3 ends

1: Canada Valley Road & Country Hills Drive Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.6 0.2 0.2 4.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 2.2 5.7 6.7 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.3 15.7 9.7 12.8 8.1 2.0 8.4 10.0 4.2 3.1 23.2 20.7 1: Canada Valley Road & Country Hills Drive Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 2.2
Total Del/Veh (s) 13.3
2: Canada Valley Road & Bella Rose/Lowes Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 18.0 7.6 15.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 32.1 46.4 24.7 36.4 16.1 8.2 24.8 9.9 4.4 36.1 30.8 18.2 2: Canada Valley Road & Bella Rose/Lowes Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 4.4
Total Del/Veh (s) 23.6
5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 200.6 199.4 206.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 2.0 2.0 4.9 Total Del/Veh (s) 86.9 185.2 49.4 217.0 25.2 9.9 50.7 59.6 39.7 94.9 89.8 78.5 5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 65.2
Total Del/Veh (s) 103.8
6: SR-4/SR-4 SB Off-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 4.5 5.0 8.5 8.9 309.3 374.1 306.9 95.7 Total Del/Veh (s) 68.0 24.1 109.4 52.7 65.9 69.1 190.3 70.9 7: Jeffrey Way/SR-4 NB On-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.1 123.2 120.4 125.1 21.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 56.4 26.6 106.4 57.4 24.9 68.3 44.4 27.3 50.4 SimTraffic Performance Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project SAT SimTraffic Report

Page 4 ends

8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 51.1 44.3 44.8 46.5 44.9 42.7 266.9 256.6 265.8 Total Del/Veh (s) 120.7 66.1 20.1 70.9 131.9 69.8 146.1 40.2 34.1 150.4 73.1 78.2 8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 79.2
Total Del/Veh (s) 92.7
9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.4 2.3 56.6 56.5 51.5 333.9 331.7 324.9 Total Del/Veh (s) 305.8 32.8 11.2 72.8 65.2 20.6 138.2 199.6 13.1 111.2 170.8 189.5 9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 103.5
Total Del/Veh (s) 110.8
44: Canada Valley Road Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.2 292.9 315.4 319.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 29.0 19.1 12.1 19.5 24.8 15.4 19.7 61.5 69.5 0.7 1.0 1.6 44: Canada Valley Road Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 122.6
Total Del/Veh (s) 25.2
Total Network Performance
Denied Del/Veh (s) 184.2
Total Del/Veh (s) 208.9
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project SAT SimTraffic Report

Page 5 ends

Intersection: 1: Canada Valley Road & Country Hills Drive Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR L T R L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 24 112 89 25 75 107 64 16 223
Average Queue (ft) 3 40 28 8 41 50 31 1 76
95th Queue (ft) 14 92 70 24 68 83 54 7 206
Link Distance (ft) 355 761 394 394 398
Upstream Blk Time (%) 3
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 200 85 50
Storage Blk Time (%) 3 0 0 1 12
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 1 0
Intersection: 2: Canada Valley Road & Bella Rose/Lowes
Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR L TR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 41 167 233 75 158 110 95 308 252
Average Queue (ft) 12 103 74 24 65 40 13 104 76
95th Queue (ft) 38 179 235 58 126 88 59 281 227
Link Distance (ft) 264 240 311 311 394 394
Upstream Blk Time (%) 10 5 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 11 5
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 90 115
Storage Blk Time (%) 28 0 0 4 13
Queuing Penalty (veh) 10 0 0 2 2
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project SAT SimTraffic Report

Page 6 ends

Intersection: 5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 125 414 860 870 875 730 450 500 792 583 339 194 Average Queue (ft) 39 135 735 784 810 581 439 486 679 176 168 55 95th Queue (ft) 94 428 992 1010 991 1048 491 550 1044 379 283 126 Link Distance (ft) 841 841 841 768 768 768
Upstream Blk Time (%) 8 27 66 29 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 239 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 315 315 630 400 400 255
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 47 80 55 67 0 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 36 126 217 261 1 6
Intersection: 5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way
Movement NB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L TR R L L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 115 141 270 275 250 322 323
Average Queue (ft) 41 72 201 194 172 232 222
95th Queue (ft) 94 121 291 288 290 357 357
Link Distance (ft) 262 262 262 311 311
Upstream Blk Time (%) 5 4 15 12
Queuing Penalty (veh) 15 12 47 38
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 150
Storage Blk Time (%) 2 16 19 46
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 13 36 91
Intersection: 6: SR-4/SR-4 SB Off-Ramp & Lone Tree Way
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB SB SB SB
Directions Served T T T R L L T T T L LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 664 695 706 563 144 340 751 751 725 449 919 917 Average Queue (ft) 383 393 423 268 68 235 561 358 295 262 743 771 95th Queue (ft) 717 734 747 606 121 454 929 762 632 477 1157 1149 Link Distance (ft) 768 768 768 708 708 708 887 887
Upstream Blk Time (%) 3 2 3 30 3 0 35 46
Queuing Penalty (veh) 22 18 25 195 21 3 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 240 240 350
Storage Blk Time (%) 11 2 54 5 11
Queuing Penalty (veh) 80 13 110 24 58
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project SAT SimTraffic Report

Page 7 ends

Intersection: 7: Jeffrey Way/SR-4 NB On-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB
Directions Served T T T R L L T T T R L LT
Maximum Queue (ft) 727 721 735 310 65 382 1017 959 957 250 300 415 Average Queue (ft) 458 437 439 211 21 97 417 336 302 183 214 285 95th Queue (ft) 807 797 807 408 55 341 1025 925 802 293 348 459 Link Distance (ft) 708 708 708 1253 1253 1253 385
Upstream Blk Time (%) 6 3 4 1 0 0 29
Queuing Penalty (veh) 63 34 42 7 1 1 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 210 315 315 150 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 29 0 31 6 15 36 12
Queuing Penalty (veh) 148 1 19 51 62 130 41
Intersection: 7: Jeffrey Way/SR-4 NB On-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Movement NB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft) 363
Average Queue (ft) 127
95th Queue (ft) 331
Link Distance (ft) 385
Upstream Blk Time (%) 5
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project SAT SimTraffic Report

Page 8 ends

Intersection: 8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 274 500 1113 1044 976 360 154 267 1077 1136 1155 700 Average Queue (ft) 141 286 640 494 408 85 74 98 587 806 933 402 95th Queue (ft) 250 570 1333 1129 928 200 130 185 1050 1212 1278 950 Link Distance (ft) 1253 1253 1253 1170 1170 1170
Upstream Blk Time (%) 8 1 0 0 0 6
Queuing Penalty (veh) 68 13 2 0 2 30
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 400 400 355 450 450 600
Storage Blk Time (%) 38 2 1 71 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 155 6 2 50 5
Intersection: 8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Movement NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 315 458 390 300 300 358 358 374
Average Queue (ft) 265 376 175 90 209 251 285 317
95th Queue (ft) 397 549 442 240 338 407 462 484
Link Distance (ft) 435 435 435 343 343 343
Upstream Blk Time (%) 39 8 0 23 15 49
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 215 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 20 65 40 21
Queuing Penalty (veh) 46 150 68 36
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project SAT SimTraffic Report

Page 9 ends

Intersection: 9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB
Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R L L
Maximum Queue (ft) 550 1186 1077 687 84 317 468 548 576 291 236 325 Average Queue (ft) 538 1029 334 205 25 122 271 276 296 106 113 240 95th Queue (ft) 608 1555 941 471 60 234 439 546 605 303 229 399 Link Distance (ft) 1170 1170 1170 1253 1253 1253
Upstream Blk Time (%) 21 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 133 3 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 450 450 435 300 225 225
Storage Blk Time (%) 76 0 2 13 2 9
Queuing Penalty (veh) 299 0 2 31 5 18
Intersection: 9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way
Movement NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served T R L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 508 401 288 350 598 618
Average Queue (ft) 370 63 174 332 581 583
95th Queue (ft) 596 279 280 421 645 630
Link Distance (ft) 483 483 574 574
Upstream Blk Time (%) 29 2 54 55
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250
Storage Blk Time (%) 55 1 6 72
Queuing Penalty (veh) 121 4 18 366
Intersection: 44: Canada Valley Road
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 128 96 30 109 92 266 266 23 35 78
Average Queue (ft) 66 39 6 47 9 258 266 1 2 6
95th Queue (ft) 118 74 24 86 54 316 279 11 18 40
Link Distance (ft) 124 124 166 166 251 251 262 262
Upstream Blk Time (%) 2 0 0 45 96
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 85 90
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 3970
SimTraffic Simulation Summary
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project PM - Mitigated SimTraffic Report

Page 1 ends

Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Start Time 3:50 3:50 3:50 3:50 3:50 3:50 3:50
End Time 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00
Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70 70 70 70
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 10203 10380 10333 9732 9492 10332 10225
Vehs Exited 10021 10260 10094 9630 9108 10166 10100
Starting Vehs 491 458 468 519 526 456 479
Ending Vehs 673 578 707 621 910 622 604
Travel Distance (mi) 5885 5971 5890 5613 5291 5914 5915 Travel Time (hr) 812.5 594.2 692.1 922.5 1108.2 670.1 757.2 Total Delay (hr) 647.6 427.0 526.6 766.2 960.2 503.9 591.0 Total Stops 21583 20724 21280 20728 21676 20911 21504
Fuel Used (gal) 397.2 352.0 370.9 414.4 443.1 367.4 388.7 Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Start Time 3:50 3:50 3:50 3:50
End Time 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00
Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 10003 9764 9714 10014
Vehs Exited 9948 9553 9607 9851
Starting Vehs 547 480 492 484
Ending Vehs 602 691 599 659
Travel Distance (mi) 5696 5537 5582 5729
Travel Time (hr) 719.0 1035.7 1002.8 831.4
Total Delay (hr) 558.8 881.0 846.9 670.9
Total Stops 20558 20597 20136 20973
Fuel Used (gal) 373.0 437.9 431.0 397.6
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 3:50
End Time 4:00
Total Time (min) 10
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.

No data recorded this interval.

SimTraffic Simulation Summary
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project PM - Mitigated SimTraffic Report

Page 2 ends

Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 4:00
End Time 5:00
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.

Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Vehs Entered 10203 10380 10333 9732 9492 10332 10225
Vehs Exited 10021 10260 10094 9630 9108 10166 10100
Starting Vehs 491 458 468 519 526 456 479
Ending Vehs 673 578 707 621 910 622 604
Travel Distance (mi) 5885 5971 5890 5613 5291 5914 5915 Travel Time (hr) 812.5 594.2 692.1 922.5 1108.2 670.1 757.2 Total Delay (hr) 647.6 427.0 526.6 766.2 960.2 503.9 591.0 Total Stops 21583 20724 21280 20728 21676 20911 21504
Fuel Used (gal) 397.2 352.0 370.9 414.4 443.1 367.4 388.7 Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 4:00
End Time 5:00
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.

Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Vehs Entered 10003 9764 9714 10014
Vehs Exited 9948 9553 9607 9851
Starting Vehs 547 480 492 484
Ending Vehs 602 691 599 659
Travel Distance (mi) 5696 5537 5582 5729
Travel Time (hr) 719.0 1035.7 1002.8 831.4
Total Delay (hr) 558.8 881.0 846.9 670.9
Total Stops 20558 20597 20136 20973
Fuel Used (gal) 373.0 437.9 431.0 397.6
SimTraffic Performance Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project PM - Mitigated SimTraffic Report

Page 3 ends

1: Canada Valley Road & Country Hills Drive Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 5.5 3.3 3.9 4.0 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.7 15.7 2.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.7 18.3 13.3 6.6 8.6 2.3 8.2 10.2 3.5 19.4 8.2 11.6 2: Canada Valley Road & Bella Rose/Lowes Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 4.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 16.8 13.8 30.2 3.6 17.3 6.7 2.9 19.2 24.3 3.1 15.8 5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 30.1 32.1 35.5 3.3 1.1 0.0 0.1 0.8 0.5 4.1 1.5 1.8 Total Del/Veh (s) 103.3 121.1 26.9 202.7 23.3 9.8 72.8 95.1 53.4 113.4 91.1 69.4 5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 11.6
Total Del/Veh (s) 89.7
6: SR-4/SR-4 SB Off-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 2.3 2.3 1.2 1.8 160.0 261.6 164.2 44.9 Total Del/Veh (s) 40.4 20.4 83.7 29.1 66.7 51.0 142.0 49.1 7: Jeffrey Way/SR-4 NB On-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.6 60.4 75.3 11.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 27.4 13.0 76.3 28.4 19.8 59.3 48.4 32.2 29.8 8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.0 1.1 0.2 0.3 4.9 4.0 3.8 Total Del/Veh (s) 78.9 37.4 19.9 66.2 68.8 13.0 76.1 37.9 18.6 78.0 58.3 51.7 8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.9
Total Del/Veh (s) 53.2
SimTraffic Performance Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project PM - Mitigated SimTraffic Report

Page 4 ends

9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 24.8 15.9 13.3 2.4 0.4 2.3 5.6 2.9 1.1 239.4 240.5 240.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 227.2 31.8 10.9 85.2 66.2 12.1 76.1 99.3 8.8 110.7 157.3 171.0 9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 77.5
Total Del/Veh (s) 94.6
44: Canada Valley Road Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.6 0.6 1.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 66.5 45.5 48.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 25.7 13.6 9.6 13.5 20.5 16.5 26.1 43.5 45.2 0.8 1.0 1.6 44: Canada Valley Road Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 15.1
Total Del/Veh (s) 18.2
Total Network Performance
Denied Del/Veh (s) 71.9
Total Del/Veh (s) 157.9
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project PM - Mitigated SimTraffic Report

Page 5 ends

Intersection: 1: Canada Valley Road & Country Hills Drive Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR L T R TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 16 113 46 25 82 104 55 133
Average Queue (ft) 1 44 22 11 42 53 26 56
95th Queue (ft) 9 130 43 27 71 86 47 154
Link Distance (ft) 355 761 394 394 398
Upstream Blk Time (%) 2 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 200 85
Storage Blk Time (%) 3 0 1 7
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 1 0
Intersection: 2: Canada Valley Road & Bella Rose/Lowes
Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR L TR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 37 120 75 62 151 95 56 255 157
Average Queue (ft) 15 52 18 15 63 24 10 84 41
95th Queue (ft) 39 107 79 46 136 64 40 257 160
Link Distance (ft) 264 240 311 311 394 394
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 3 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 6 3
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 90 115
Storage Blk Time (%) 8 0 3 13
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 0 1 2
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project PM - Mitigated SimTraffic Report

Page 6 ends

Intersection: 5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 107 413 854 844 870 730 630 690 789 521 344 229 Average Queue (ft) 42 61 551 601 651 284 521 564 440 160 165 63 95th Queue (ft) 90 270 956 1005 1022 832 749 813 978 355 318 156 Link Distance (ft) 841 841 841 768 768 768
Upstream Blk Time (%) 5 11 26 21 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 154 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 315 315 630 570 570 255
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 31 42 32 38 0 3 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 17 44 114 133 1 9 0
Intersection: 5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way
Movement NB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L TR R L L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 135 158 275 280 249 320 303
Average Queue (ft) 47 81 221 215 167 229 150
95th Queue (ft) 113 136 304 313 284 356 283
Link Distance (ft) 262 262 262 311 311
Upstream Blk Time (%) 12 9 16 3
Queuing Penalty (veh) 29 22 38 6
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 150
Storage Blk Time (%) 7 26 21 48
Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 16 34 77
Intersection: 6: SR-4/SR-4 SB Off-Ramp & Lone Tree Way
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB SB SB SB
Directions Served T T T R L L T T T L LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 556 549 584 534 121 340 724 685 498 450 907 912 Average Queue (ft) 281 285 329 201 57 124 359 201 157 288 593 613 95th Queue (ft) 548 552 581 460 107 326 794 546 386 490 1031 1063 Link Distance (ft) 768 768 768 708 708 708 887 887
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 1 1 13 1 0 24 27
Queuing Penalty (veh) 10 8 11 77 5 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 240 240 350
Storage Blk Time (%) 4 0 27 4 13
Queuing Penalty (veh) 25 2 40 20 62
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project PM - Mitigated SimTraffic Report

Page 7 ends

Intersection: 7: Jeffrey Way/SR-4 NB On-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB
Directions Served T T T R L L T T T R L LT
Maximum Queue (ft) 491 527 554 291 54 164 565 526 539 250 300 404 Average Queue (ft) 231 221 239 98 15 47 214 161 162 141 221 278 95th Queue (ft) 483 468 490 256 43 203 574 476 412 275 333 434 Link Distance (ft) 708 708 708 1253 1253 1253 385
Upstream Blk Time (%) 3 1 1 15
Queuing Penalty (veh) 25 5 5 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 210 315 315 150 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 12 0 10 4 8 22 18
Queuing Penalty (veh) 55 0 4 32 30 74 57
Intersection: 7: Jeffrey Way/SR-4 NB On-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Movement NB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft) 304
Average Queue (ft) 102
95th Queue (ft) 258
Link Distance (ft) 385
Upstream Blk Time (%) 3
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project PM - Mitigated SimTraffic Report

Page 8 ends

Intersection: 8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 219 354 570 526 481 302 167 257 517 659 720 380 Average Queue (ft) 117 180 321 250 237 115 66 87 275 365 495 57 95th Queue (ft) 198 385 786 631 549 235 130 171 463 626 736 301 Link Distance (ft) 1253 1253 1253 1170 1170 1170
Upstream Blk Time (%) 3 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 25 2 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 400 400 355 450 450 600
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 11 0 0 0 0 9
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 36 2 0 0 0 5
Intersection: 8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Movement NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 308 401 174 161 220 260 358 360
Average Queue (ft) 154 226 68 56 108 140 263 269
95th Queue (ft) 270 344 137 124 215 240 369 387
Link Distance (ft) 435 435 435 343 343 343
Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 2 4 8
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 215 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 16 6 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 30 7 3
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project PM - Mitigated SimTraffic Report

Page 9 ends

Intersection: 9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB
Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R L L
Maximum Queue (ft) 550 1144 1092 616 80 261 426 412 428 374 186 304 Average Queue (ft) 515 768 258 179 29 118 278 256 265 73 69 126 95th Queue (ft) 646 1457 739 405 67 215 421 398 411 214 149 245 Link Distance (ft) 1170 1170 1170 1253 1253 1253
Upstream Blk Time (%) 7 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 36 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 450 450 435 300 225 225
Storage Blk Time (%) 60 0 8 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 195 0 18 0 1
Intersection: 9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way
Movement NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served T R L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 390 57 299 350 605 602
Average Queue (ft) 194 15 181 318 574 575
95th Queue (ft) 365 38 307 436 674 660
Link Distance (ft) 483 483 574 574
Upstream Blk Time (%) 2 48 55
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250
Storage Blk Time (%) 13 5 11 67
Queuing Penalty (veh) 24 15 36 306
Intersection: 44: Canada Valley Road
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 132 65 32 115 47 271 288 19 40 73
Average Queue (ft) 61 24 8 44 4 120 206 1 2 3
95th Queue (ft) 114 51 28 85 26 303 338 11 19 32
Link Distance (ft) 124 124 166 166 251 251 262 262
Upstream Blk Time (%) 2 0 12 41
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 85 90
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 2005
SimTraffic Simulation Summary
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project SAT - Mitigated SimTraffic Report

Page 1 ends

Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Start Time 11:50 11:50 11:50 11:50 11:50 11:50 11:50
End Time 1:00 1:00 1:00 1:00 1:00 1:00 1:00
Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70 70 70 70
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 10531 10415 10405 10351 10179 10506 10642
Vehs Exited 10404 10257 10248 10139 9845 10199 10324
Starting Vehs 609 616 641 626 571 566 598
Ending Vehs 736 774 798 838 905 873 916
Travel Distance (mi) 5983 5980 5981 5878 5777 5930 5987 Travel Time (hr) 1407.5 1414.5 1431.6 1263.8 1565.5 1453.8 1367.2 Total Delay (hr) 1238.6 1245.6 1262.5 1097.4 1402.8 1286.3 1197.5 Total Stops 24111 25310 25789 25275 26278 24741 25688
Fuel Used (gal) 540.7 539.9 542.1 500.4 564.7 545.7 529.0 Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Start Time 11:50 11:50 11:50 11:50
End Time 1:00 1:00 1:00 1:00
Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 10348 10555 10142 10405
Vehs Exited 10148 10473 9889 10193
Starting Vehs 583 614 641 603
Ending Vehs 783 696 894 819
Travel Distance (mi) 5896 6062 5624 5910
Travel Time (hr) 1390.3 1332.4 1545.7 1417.2
Total Delay (hr) 1223.7 1160.6 1387.3 1250.2
Total Stops 24112 24008 23750 24907
Fuel Used (gal) 531.6 525.5 556.5 537.6
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 11:50
End Time 12:00
Total Time (min) 10
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.

No data recorded this interval.

SimTraffic Simulation Summary
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project SAT - Mitigated SimTraffic Report

Page 2 ends

Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 12:00
End Time 1:00
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.

Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Vehs Entered 10531 10415 10405 10351 10179 10506 10642
Vehs Exited 10404 10257 10248 10139 9845 10199 10324
Starting Vehs 609 616 641 626 571 566 598
Ending Vehs 736 774 798 838 905 873 916
Travel Distance (mi) 5983 5980 5981 5878 5777 5930 5987 Travel Time (hr) 1407.5 1414.5 1431.6 1263.8 1565.5 1453.8 1367.2 Total Delay (hr) 1238.6 1245.6 1262.5 1097.4 1402.8 1286.3 1197.5 Total Stops 24111 25310 25789 25275 26278 24741 25688
Fuel Used (gal) 540.7 539.9 542.1 500.4 564.7 545.7 529.0 Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 12:00
End Time 1:00
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.

Run Number 8 9 10 Avg
Vehs Entered 10348 10555 10142 10405
Vehs Exited 10148 10473 9889 10193
Starting Vehs 583 614 641 603
Ending Vehs 783 696 894 819
Travel Distance (mi) 5896 6062 5624 5910
Travel Time (hr) 1390.3 1332.4 1545.7 1417.2
Total Delay (hr) 1223.7 1160.6 1387.3 1250.2
Total Stops 24112 24008 23750 24907
Fuel Used (gal) 531.6 525.5 556.5 537.6
SimTraffic Performance Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project SAT - Mitigated SimTraffic Report

Page 3 ends

1: Canada Valley Road & Country Hills Drive Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.6 0.2 0.2 4.0 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 7.9 10.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.8 12.0 8.6 12.2 8.6 1.9 8.6 10.2 4.3 20.8 6.8 1: Canada Valley Road & Country Hills Drive Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 2.9
Total Del/Veh (s) 12.4
2: Canada Valley Road & Bella Rose/Lowes Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 23.0 10.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 23.1 27.2 14.2 38.4 8.3 23.0 9.4 4.1 39.4 30.3 12.5 2: Canada Valley Road & Bella Rose/Lowes Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 5.3
Total Del/Veh (s) 23.5
5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 197.9 187.6 188.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 1.9 2.0 1.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 95.4 200.0 49.8 126.1 19.5 8.0 54.1 74.7 50.1 99.9 96.4 82.8 5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 59.9
Total Del/Veh (s) 95.1
6: SR-4/SR-4 SB Off-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT SBL SBT SBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 8.6 7.0 0.2 0.0 131.6 93.8 133.1 42.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 80.1 24.8 65.9 16.6 90.5 78.6 150.6 64.6 7: Jeffrey Way/SR-4 NB On-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 21.9 24.0 21.7 4.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 53.0 19.9 66.2 18.4 21.4 44.8 47.8 57.3 37.9 SimTraffic Performance Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project SAT - Mitigated SimTraffic Report

Page 4 ends

8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.8 20.0 19.2 1.5 0.5 0.7 938.8 939.1 929.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 145.9 76.0 19.0 78.1 93.1 35.4 58.6 47.6 48.4 376.5 119.1 115.2 8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 220.7
Total Del/Veh (s) 88.5
9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.4 2.4 4.0 1.3 1.3 125.5 127.3 126.9 Total Del/Veh (s) 368.6 48.7 13.8 74.0 60.7 11.3 64.8 84.5 8.8 94.1 134.9 152.6 9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way Performance by movement Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 38.8
Total Del/Veh (s) 101.4
44: Canada Valley Road Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.6 3.6 4.3 0.4 0.3 0.5 315.2 339.0 354.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 34.4 17.3 12.7 13.9 31.4 21.9 24.3 67.2 76.7 0.8 1.0 1.5 44: Canada Valley Road Performance by movement
Movement All
Denied Del/Veh (s) 125.6
Total Del/Veh (s) 25.8
Total Network Performance
Denied Del/Veh (s) 196.5
Total Del/Veh (s) 192.4
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project SAT - Mitigated SimTraffic Report

Page 5 ends

Intersection: 1: Canada Valley Road & Country Hills Drive Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR L T R L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 24 102 89 23 90 103 77 9 174
Average Queue (ft) 3 40 29 8 42 50 33 0 72
95th Queue (ft) 15 91 71 24 71 82 58 5 189
Link Distance (ft) 355 761 394 394 398
Upstream Blk Time (%) 3
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 200 85 50
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 0 0 1 12
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 1 1 0
Intersection: 2: Canada Valley Road & Bella Rose/Lowes
Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR L TR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 37 169 217 99 201 108 109 315 244
Average Queue (ft) 10 107 71 28 71 40 13 111 76
95th Queue (ft) 33 184 231 66 154 85 62 293 219
Link Distance (ft) 264 240 311 311 394 394
Upstream Blk Time (%) 12 4 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 10 2
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 90 115
Storage Blk Time (%) 29 0 0 4 15
Queuing Penalty (veh) 11 0 0 1 2
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project SAT - Mitigated SimTraffic Report

Page 6 ends

Intersection: 5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way
Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 103 415 863 868 880 730 604 654 663 372 329 186 Average Queue (ft) 38 133 735 786 813 565 406 432 244 152 167 50 95th Queue (ft) 84 427 1008 1009 996 1049 679 723 677 282 276 121 Link Distance (ft) 841 841 841 768 768 768
Upstream Blk Time (%) 10 27 68 4 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 31 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 315 315 630 570 570 255
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 52 81 10 14 0 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 41 128 40 54 0 5
Intersection: 5: Canada Valley Road & Lone Tree Way
Movement NB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L TR R L L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 121 148 274 277 250 330 327
Average Queue (ft) 40 71 213 205 176 238 230
95th Queue (ft) 95 123 295 301 288 363 366
Link Distance (ft) 262 262 262 311 311
Upstream Blk Time (%) 10 8 17 11
Queuing Penalty (veh) 33 27 54 36
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 150
Storage Blk Time (%) 4 16 20 49
Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 13 40 96
Intersection: 6: SR-4/SR-4 SB Off-Ramp & Lone Tree Way
Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB SB SB SB
Directions Served T T T R L L T T T L LT R
Maximum Queue (ft) 730 743 738 612 132 242 406 312 281 450 918 924 Average Queue (ft) 455 460 480 322 68 91 198 123 123 364 836 851 95th Queue (ft) 756 769 767 625 117 212 425 292 259 519 1102 1085 Link Distance (ft) 768 768 768 708 708 708 887 887
Upstream Blk Time (%) 6 5 5 1 0 0 37 40
Queuing Penalty (veh) 47 45 39 9 1 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 240 240 350
Storage Blk Time (%) 15 0 7 16 30
Queuing Penalty (veh) 112 1 13 83 156
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project SAT - Mitigated SimTraffic Report

Page 7 ends

Intersection: 7: Jeffrey Way/SR-4 NB On-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB
Directions Served T T T R L L T T T R L LT
Maximum Queue (ft) 688 706 713 310 71 73 375 299 463 250 299 403 Average Queue (ft) 438 421 409 160 21 32 148 105 150 156 201 261 95th Queue (ft) 808 804 784 362 54 64 316 236 368 293 320 416 Link Distance (ft) 708 708 708 1253 1253 1253 385
Upstream Blk Time (%) 14 6 3 6
Queuing Penalty (veh) 137 54 29 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 210 315 315 150 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 24 0 2 3 11 8 18
Queuing Penalty (veh) 121 0 1 23 49 28 59
Intersection: 7: Jeffrey Way/SR-4 NB On-Ramp & Lone Tree Way Movement NB
Directions Served R
Maximum Queue (ft) 394
Average Queue (ft) 163
95th Queue (ft) 349
Link Distance (ft) 385
Upstream Blk Time (%) 5
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project SAT - Mitigated SimTraffic Report

Page 8 ends

Intersection: 8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Movement EB EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB
Directions Served L L T T T R L L T T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 260 500 1247 1238 1182 350 173 214 913 987 1042 700 Average Queue (ft) 136 354 819 660 531 85 88 108 388 589 735 245 95th Queue (ft) 234 636 1562 1378 1157 204 148 178 831 1066 1181 762 Link Distance (ft) 1253 1253 1253 1170 1170 1170
Upstream Blk Time (%) 17 3 0 0 0 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 153 24 3 0 1 6
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 400 400 355 450 450 600
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 55 3 0 41 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 224 10 0 29 6
Intersection: 8: Shady Willow Lane/Slatten Ranch Road & Lone Tree Way Movement NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served L L T TR L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 314 418 278 246 297 356 358 373
Average Queue (ft) 166 237 109 97 224 277 184 192
95th Queue (ft) 308 386 213 209 358 437 461 480
Link Distance (ft) 435 435 435 343 343 343
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 0 55 21 41
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 215 200
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 20 64 5
Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 46 107 8
Queuing and Blocking Report
01/06/2023
Cumulative + Project SAT - Mitigated SimTraffic Report

Page 9 ends

Intersection: 9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way
Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB
Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R L L
Maximum Queue (ft) 550 1187 1162 693 87 278 411 366 412 236 189 311 Average Queue (ft) 548 1101 325 246 37 117 276 244 254 75 79 134 95th Queue (ft) 564 1420 835 520 78 214 402 368 390 208 158 249 Link Distance (ft) 1170 1170 1170 1253 1253 1253
Upstream Blk Time (%) 37 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 233 3 1
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 450 450 435 300 225 225
Storage Blk Time (%) 83 0 0 0 6 0 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 329 0 0 0 15 0 1
Intersection: 9: Empire Avenue & Lone Tree Way
Movement NB NB SB SB SB SB
Directions Served T R L L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 412 104 299 350 598 610
Average Queue (ft) 199 21 199 328 554 560
95th Queue (ft) 343 72 313 410 702 682
Link Distance (ft) 483 483 574 574
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 0 38 45
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250
Storage Blk Time (%) 11 2 10 59
Queuing Penalty (veh) 23 7 33 298
Intersection: 44: Canada Valley Road
Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served L TR L TR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 139 99 59 134 94 266 266 19 43 62
Average Queue (ft) 70 35 7 53 9 251 262 1 2 3
95th Queue (ft) 127 76 46 107 51 337 300 9 20 29
Link Distance (ft) 124 124 166 166 251 251 262 262
Upstream Blk Time (%) 4 1 1 2 47 94
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 85 90
Storage Blk Time (%) 1 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 3202
Appendix K - 95th
Percentile
Queueing Analysis
Existing
Conditions
Background
Conditions
Background
Plus Project
Conditions
Background
Plus Project
Conditions
(Mitigated)
Cumulative
Conditions
Cumulative
Plus Project
Conditions
Cumulative
Plus Project
Conditions
(Mitigated)
Existing
Conditions
Background
Conditions
Background
Plus Project
Conditions
Background
Plus Project
Conditions
(Mitigated)
Cumulative
Conditions
Cumulative
Plus Project
Conditions
Cumulative
Plus Project
Conditions
(Mitigated)
WBL 75 70 70 73 72 73 176 168 180 176 180
NBL 90 23 23 23 23 23 48 46 49 48 49
SBL 115 17 17 18 17 18 23 22 24 23 24
EBL 615 265 238 269 293 300 204 196 231 241 247
WBL 260 109 99 109 129 132 100 89 103 117 120
WBR 570 54 55 62 57 62 56 57 64 60 67
NBL 225 86 78 86 91 93 91 81 94 97 100
SBL 615 246 219 264 279 301 239 210 273 270 300
SBR 300 49 46 48 50 50 49 45 50 51 51
EBL 210 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 26 27 26 26 26 26 26
WBL 415 298 297 466 462 362 #644 286 396 399 m#965 312 #569 m#1072 338 NBL 210 87 89 131 125 121 160 158 93 94 157 151 #158 #294 196 NBR 210 83 53 89 89 75 101 105 73 55 88 105 66 101 118
SBL 80 51 27 50 50 49 50 50 58 58 55 60 60 60 60
EBL 315 52 51 m36 51 m34 m40 m41 m42 m44 m44
EBR 630 7 15 m1 0 m0 m15 m17 m30 m23 m41
WBL 500 #410 #392 m#545 #386 m#550 316 321 #539 316 #539 WBR 255 m127 m120 m101 m107 m92 55 55 55 55 55
NBL 125 54 54 82 53 82 64 64 100 64 100
SBL 150 179 179 177 190 190 213 216 213 230 230
EBR 550 427 298 m394 300 m382 113 80 138 80 138
WBL 315 115 95 97 98 100 157 131 132 132 132
SBL 350 283 283 285 #581 #581 309 298 301 #628 #628
EBR 250 67 55 64 m93 m117 216 99 215 122 268
WBL 315 53 39 39 39 39 65 41 44 41 44
WBR 150 51 39 46 44 59 107 43 69 96 199
NBL 200 425 309 363 309 370 375 237 321 237 321
EBL 400 166 166 158 212 212 203 208 221 209 #308 #308 #277 EBR 355 43 43 42 149 159 149 40 42 41 69 77 64
WBL 450 58 58 56 123 123 117 69 73 69 #161 #161 #161
WBR 600 13 13 12 0 0 0 20 22 20 0 0 0
NBL 215 136 136 134 235 241 229 160 168 165 #332 #346 280 SBL 200 87 87 84 167 167 159 111 117 112 218 218 #240
EBL 450 346 346 342 #745 #763 264 375 388 386 #825 #853 309 EBR 450 29 29 27 42 42 - 24 25 23 39 39 -
WBL 435 130 130 127 158 158 155 139 144 139 173 173 173 WBR 300 51 51 49 62 62 61 50 51 49 64 64 119
NBL 225 90 90 87 114 114 117 98 102 98 138 138 140
SBL 250 158 158 153 247 247 247 176 #197 #182 276 276 281 WBL 75 17 15 19 20 26 26 23 31 30 40
WBR 75 42 38 46 42 50 50 47 56 50 60
SBL 255 76 67 86 74 99 129 119 163 132 195
WBL 125 47 47 143 56 155 47 49 168 136 56 180 172
SBL 300 21 21 255 21 260 45 46 #494 114 46 #511 180
1 Queue lengths were unable to be estimated using SimTraffic. These results are Synchro outputs. 95th percentile queue exceeds existing storage under existing conditions 95th percentile queue exceeds existing storage with the addition of the project 95th percentile queue contained within storage with mitigation # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity; queue may be longer m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal 9 10
11 Empire Avenue & Lone
Tree Way
Heidorn Ranch Road &
Kohls Driveway
Heidorn Ranch Road &
Lone Tree Plaza
7 8
SR-4/SR-4 SB Off-Ramp &
Lone Tree Way
Jeffrey Way/SR-4 NB OnRamp & Lone Tree Way
Shady Willow
Lane/Slatten Ranch Road
& Lone Tree Way
4 Heidorn Ranch
Road/Fairside Way &
Lone Tree Way
5 Canada Valley Road &
Lone Tree Way1
6 Existing
Storage (ft)
95th Percentile Queues (ft)
Weekday PM Peak Hour
95th Percentile Queues (ft)
Saturday Midday Peak Hour
95th Percentile Queue Lengths
3 Hillcrest Avenue & Lone
Tree Way
2 Canada Valley Road &
Lowe's Driveway
# Intersection Movement

Page 1 ends

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
Application Form and Planning Survey Report
To Comply With and Receive Permit Coverage Under
The East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan
and Natural Community Conservation Plan
Please complete this application to apply for take authorization under the state and federal East Contra Costa County HCP/NCCP incidental take permits. The East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy (“Conservancy”) or local jurisdiction (City of Brentwood, City of Clayton, City of Oakley, City of Pittsburg, and Contra Costa County) may request more information in order to deem the application complete.

I. PROJECT OVERVIEW

PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT NAME: Brentwood Costco Wholesale and Gas Station Project PROJECT TYPE: Residential Commercial Transportation Utility Other PROJECT DESCRIPTION (BRIEF): The project entails construction of a Costco Wholesale retail facility and associated gas station.

PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: The project is located on Lone Tree Plaza Drive, just west of California State Route 4.

PARCEL/PROJECT SIZE (ACRES): Total project size = 19.20 acres PROJECT APN(S): 019-020-073 (19.04 acres); 019-020-055 (4.02 acres) APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DATE: 05/02/2022 FINAL PSR DATE: (City/County/Conservancy use) LEAD PLANNER: Erik Nolthenius; [email protected], (925) 516-5137 JURISDICTION: City of Brentwood City of Clayton City of Oakley City of Pittsburg Contra Costa County Participating Special Entity*

DEVELOPMENT FEE ZONE: Zone I Zone II Zone III Zone IV
See figure 9-1 of the HCP/NCCP at www.cocohcp.org for a generalized development fee zone map. Detailed development fee zone maps by jurisdiction are available from the jurisdiction.

PROJECT APPLICANT INFORMATION
APPLICANT’S NAME: Arcadia Development Co.

AUTHORIZED AGENT’S NAME AND TITLE: Michael Fletcher; President, Arcadia Companies PHONE NO.: (408) 961-8125 APPLICANT’S E-MAIL: [email protected] MAILING ADDRESS: 5185 Cherry Avenue, Suite 10. San Jose, CA 95118

BIOLOGIST INFORMATION1
BIOLOGICAL/ENVIRONMENTAL FIRM: Kleinfelder
CONTACT NAME AND TITLE: Lisa Achter, Senior Wildlife Biologist, acting on behalf of Katie Gray, Wildlife Biologist (Katie Gray conducted the site visit and prepared the biological report; Lisa provided senior review of the analysis/report and prepared the PSR) PHONE NO.: 530-217-8952 CONTACT’S E-MAIL: [email protected] MAILING ADDRESS: 2882 Prospect Park Dr, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 1 A USFWS/CDFW-approved biologist (project-specific) is required to conduct the surveys. Please submit biologist(s) approval request to the Conservancy. *Participating Special Entities are organizations not subject to the authority of a local jurisdiction. Such organizations may include school districts, irrigation districts, transportation agencies, local park districts, geological hazard abatement districts, or other utilities or special districts that own land or provide public services.

Page 2 ends

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
II. PROJECT DETAILS
Please complete and/or provide the following attachments:
1) Project Description
Attach as Attachment A: Project Description. Provide a detailed written description that concisely and completely describes the project and location. Include the following information:
• All activities proposed for the site or project, including roads utilized, construction staging areas, and the installation of underground facilities, to ensure the entire project is covered by the HCP/NCCP permit
• Proposed construction dates, including details on construction phases, if applicable • Reference a City/County application number for the project, if applicable • General Best Management Practices, if applicable
• If the project will have temporary impacts, please provide a restoration plan describing how the site will be restored to pre-project conditions, including revegetation seed mixes or plantings and timing 2) Project Vicinity Map
Provide a project vicinity map. Attach as Figure 1 in Attachment B: Figures. 3) Project Site Plans
Provide any project site plans for the project. Attach as Figure 2 in Attachment B: Figures. 4) CEQA Document
Indicate the status of CEQA documents prepared for the project. Provide additional comments below table if necessary.

Type of Document Status Date Completed
Initial Study
Notice of Preparation
Draft EIR
Final EIR Preparing addendum to PA-1 Specific Plan EIR In process Notice of Categorical Exemption
Notice of Statutory Exemption
Other (describe) Preparing Community Plan Exemption In process

III. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND IMPACTS
Please complete and/or provide the following attachments:
1) Field-Verified Land Cover Map2
Attach a field-verified land cover map in Attachment B: Figures and label as Figure 3. The map should contain all land cover types present on-site overlaid on aerial/satellite imagery. Map colors for the land cover types should conform to the HCP/NCCP (see Figure 3-3: Landcover in the Inventory Area for land cover type legend).
2) Photographs of the Project Site
Attach representative photos of the project site in Attachment B: Figures and label as Figure 4. Please provide captions for each photo.
2 For PSEs and city or county public works projects, please also identify permanent and temporary impact areas by overlaying crosshatching (permanent impacts) and hatching (temporary impacts) on the land cover map.

Page 3 ends

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
3) Land Cover Types and Impacts and Supplemental Tables • For all terrestrial land cover types please provide calculations to the nearest hundredth of an acre (0.01).

For aquatic land cover types please provide calculations to the nearest thousandth of an acre (0.001). • Permanent Impacts are broadly defined in the ECCC HCP/NCCP to include all areas removed from an undeveloped or habitat-providing state and includes land in the same parcel or project that is not developed, graded, physically altered, or directly affected in any way but is isolated from natural areas by the covered activity. Unless such undeveloped land is dedicated to the Preserve System or is a deed-restricted creek setback, the development mitigation fee will apply (if proposed, would require Conservancy approval). • Temporary Impacts are broadly defined in the ECCC HCP/NCCP as any impact on vegetation or habitat that does not result in permanent habitat removal (i.e. vegetation can eventually recover). • If wetland (riparian woodland/scrub, wetland, or aquatic) land cover types are present on the parcel but will not be impacted please discuss in the following section 4) Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters. Wetland impact fees will only be charged if wetland features are impacted. However, development fees will apply to the entire parcel. • Stream land cover type is considered a linear feature where impacts are calculated based on length impacted. The acreage within a stream, below Top of Bank (TOB), must be assigned to the adjacent land cover type(s). Insert area of impact to stream below TOB in parentheses after the Land Cover acreage number (e.g., Riparian Woodland/Scrub: 10 (0.036) – where 10 is the total impacted acreage including 0.036 acre, which is the acreage within stream TOB).

Complete following supplemental Stream Feature Detail table to provide information for linear feet. • Total Impacts acreage should be the total parcel acreage (development project) or project footprint acreage (rural infrastructure or utility project).

Table 1: Land Cover Types and Impacts
Land Cover Type Permanent
Impacts
Temporary
Impacts
Stream Setback Preserve System
Dedication
Grassland
Annual Grassland -
Alkali Grassland -
Ruderal -
Shrubland
Chaparral and Scrub -
Woodland
Oak Savannah -
Oak Woodland -
Riparian
Riparian Woodland/Scrub -
Wetland
Permanent Wetland -
Seasonal Wetland -
Alkali Wetland -
Aquatic
Aquatic (Reservoir/Open Water) -
Slough/Channel -
Pond -
Stream (in linear feet) - - - -
Irrigated Agriculture
Pasture -
Cropland 23.06
Orchard -
Vineyard -
Other
Nonnative woodland -
Wind turbines -
Developed (not counted toward Fees)
Urban -
Aqueduct -
Turf -
Landfill -
TOTAL IMPACTS 23.06
Proposed for HCP/NCCP
Dedication on the Parcel
(Requires Conservancy Approval)

Page 4 ends

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
Identify any uncommon vegetation and uncommon landscape features3:

Supplemental to Table 1: Uncommon Vegetation and Landscape Features Please provide details of impacts to stream features:

Stream Name: N/A
Watershed: N/A
Supplemental to Table 1: Stream Feature Detail5
3 These acreages are for Conservancy tracking purposes. Impacts to these uncommon vegetation and landscape features should be accounted for within the land cover types in Table 1 (e.g., x acres of purple needlegrass in this supplemental table should be accounted for within annual grassland in Table 1). 4 Insert amount/number, not acreage. Provide additional information on these features in Attachment A: Project Description. 5 Use more than 1 row as necessary to describe impacts to streams on site. 6 See glossary (Appendix A) for definition of stream type and order. 7 Stream length is measured along stream centerline, based on length of impact to any part of the stream channel, TOB to TOB.

Permanent
Impacts
Temporary
Impacts
Uncommon Grassland Alliances
Purple Needlegrass Grassland -
Blue Wildrye Grassland -
Creeping Ryegrass Grassland -
Wildflower Fields -
Squirreltail Grassland -
One-sided Bluegrass Grassland -
Serpentine Bunchgrass Grassland -
Saltgrass Grassland -
Alkali Sacaton Bunchgrass Grassland -
Other -
Uncommon Landscape Features
Rock Outcrops -
Caves -
Springs and seeps -
Scalds -
Sand Deposits -
Mines4 -
Buildings (bat roosts)3 -
Potential nest sites (trees or cliffs)3 -
Stream Width Stream Type6 Permanent Impacts
(linear feet)7
Temporary Impacts
(linear feet)7
≤ 25 feet wide
> 25 feet wide
Perennial
Intermittent
Ephemeral, 3rd or higher order
Ephemeral, 1st or 2nd order
- -
≤ 25 feet wide
> 25 feet wide
Perennial
Intermittent
Ephemeral, 3rd or higher order
Ephemeral, 1st or 2nd order
- -
≤ 25 feet wide
> 25 feet wide
Perennial
Intermittent
Ephemeral, 3rd or higher order
Ephemeral, 1st or 2nd order
- -

Page 5 ends

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
4) Summary of Land Cover Types
Please provide a written summary of descriptions for land cover types found on site including characteristic vegetation.

The site is mapped as future urban by the ECCC HCP and existing site conditions consist of a dormant agricultural field that had been recently plowed, therefore no vegetation was present throughout most of the parcel at the time of survey. Dominant grass species observed on the edges of parcel and in the northeast corner included oats (Avena sp.), ripgut brome (Bromus diandrus), and foxtail barley (Hordeum murinum). Although the areas on the parcel where vegetation remains are composed predominately of grass species, a few other weedy herbaceous species, including Russian thistle (Salsola tragus), Italian thistle (Carduus pycnocephalus), shortpod mustard (Hirschfeldia incana), Saharan mustard (Brassica tournefortii), curly dock (Rumex crispus), and yellow star thistle (Centaurea solstitialis) were observed. Large patches of shortpod mustard were found in and along the drainage ditch. One large coyote bush (Baccharis pilularis) was present in the northeast corner of the parcel. 5) Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters
If wetlands and waters are present on the project site, project proponents must conduct a delineation of jurisdictional wetlands and waters. Jurisdictional wetlands and waters are defined on pages 1-18 and 1-19 of the ECCC HCP/NCCP as the following land cover types: permanent wetland, seasonal wetland, alkali wetland, aquatic, pond, slough/channel, and stream. It should be noted that these features differ for federal and state jurisdictions. If you have identified any of these land cover types in Table 1, complete the section below. a) Attach the wetland delineation report as Attachment E: Wetland Delineation. If a wetland delineation has not been completed, please explain below in section 4c. b) Please check the following permits the project may require. Please submit copies of these permits to the Conservancy prior to the start of construction:

CWA Section 404 Permit8 CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification Waste Discharge Requirements Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement c) Provide any additional information on impacts to jurisdictional wetland and waters below, including status of the permit(s):

A concrete lined, man-made drainage ditch traverses the parcel starting at the north side of the project boundary and ending at the southeast corner at the intersection of State Highway 4. This feature is classified in the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) as an excavated seasonally flooded riverine streambed feature (R4SBCx); however, the drainage ditch did not extend beyond the parcel boundaries and did not connect to any other water features. A review of USGS maps revealed that historically, the drainage ditch connected to the Mokelumne aqueduct; however, development in the area of the project has altered that connection. No potentially jurisdictional vernal pools, seasonal wetlands, marshes, ponds, creeks, or lakes, or any soils or vegetation that would indicate such features, were observed on or adjacent to the site.
8 The USACE Sacramento District issued a Regional General Permit 1 (RGP) related to ECCC HCP/NCCP covered activities. The RGP is designed to streamline wetland permitting in the entire ECCC HCP/NCCP Plan Area by coordinating the avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures in the Plan with the Corps’ wetland permitting requirement. Applicants seeking authorization under this RGP shall notify the Corps in accordance with RGP general condition number 18 (Notification).

Page 6 ends

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
6) Species-Specific Planning Survey Requirements
Based on the land cover types found on-site and identified in Table 1, check the applicable boxes in Table 2a.

Table 2a. Species –Specific Planning Survey Requirements Land Cover Type
in Project Area Required Survey Species Habitat Element in Project Area Planning Survey Requirement9 Info in HCP Grasslands,
oak savannah,
agriculture, or
ruderal
San Joaquin kit fox Assumed if within modeled range
of species
If within modeled range of species,
identify and map potential breeding or
denning habitat within the project site
and a 250-ft radius around the project
footprint.
pp. 6-37
to 6-38
Western burrowing
owl
Assumed Identify and map potential breeding
habitat within the project site and a
500-ft radius around the project
footprint. Please note the HCP
requires buffers for occupied burrows.

Surveys may need to encompass an
area larger than the project footprint.
pp. 6-39
to 6-41
Aquatic
(ponds,
wetlands,
streams, sloughs,
channels, and
marshes)
Giant garter snake Aquatic habitat accessible from
the San Joaquin River
Identify and map potential habitat. pp. 6-43
to 6-45
California tiger
salamander
Ponds and wetlands
Vernal pools
Reservoirs
Small lakes
Identify and map potential breeding
habitat. Document habitat quality and
features. Provide the Conservancy
with photo-documentation and report.
pp. 6-45
California
red-legged frog
Slow-moving streams, ponds and
wetlands
Identify and map potential breeding
habitat. Document habitat quality and
features. Provide the Conservancy
with photo-documentation and report.
p. 6-46
Covered shrimp Seasonal wetlands
Vernal pools
Sandstone rock outcrops
Sandstone depressions
Identify and map potential habitat.

Please note the HCP requires a 50 foot
non-disturbance buffer from seasonal
wetlands that may be occupied by
covered shrimp. Surveys may need to
encompass an area larger than the
project footprint.
pp. 6-46
to 6-48
Any Townsend’s big-eared
bat
Rock formations with caves
Mines
Abandoned buildings outside
urban area
Map and document potential breeding
or roosting habitat.
pp. 6-36
to 6-37
Swainson’s hawk Potential nest sites within 1,000
feet of project
Inspect large trees for presence of nest
sites. Document and map.
pp. 6-41
to 6-43
Golden Eagle Potential nest sites with ½ mile of
project
Inspect large trees for presence of nest
sites. Document and map.
pp. 6-38
to 6-39
Surveys for all covered species must be conducted by a qualified biologist (USFWS/CDFW project-specific approved). Please submit biologist approval request to the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy.

Surveys for all covered species must be conducted according to the respective USFWS or CDFW survey protocols, as identified in Chapter

6.4.3 in the HCP/NCCP.
7) Planning Survey Species Habitat Maps
Provide Planning Survey Species Habitat Maps as required in Table 2a, attach as Figure 5 in Attachment B:

Figures.
9 The planning survey requirements in this table are not comprehensive. Please refer to Chapter 6.4.3 in the ECCC HCP/NCCP for more detail.

Page 7 ends

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
8) Results of Species Specific Surveys
Provide a written summary describing the results of the planning surveys. Please discuss the location, quantity, and quality of suitable habitat for specified covered wildlife species on the project site.

The potential for use of the site by special-status wildlife species is generally low due to the heavily disturbed nature of the site and the developed nature of the surrounding area.

Swainson’s hawk. No Swainson’s hawks were observed at the project site during the May 27, 2021 field survey, which was conducted during the nesting period for this species. The cropland within the site could provide suitable foraging habitat for Swainson’s hawk when non-native annual grass species are at a low height, or when the site is being disked/plowed, and there are trees adjacent to the site boundary that are large enough to support nesting raptors, including pine and walnut trees, which are both species known to support nesting Swainson’s hawks. Some of the larger trees associated with residences surrounding the project site have the potential to be used for nesting by Swainson’s hawk as well; however, most of the ornamental trees intermixed within the residential subdivisions, commercial properties, and roads surrounding the site are too small to support nesting raptors. No trees visible from the site contained large stick nests. There are 13 documented occurrences of Swainson’s hawk within five miles of the project site, two of which are from 2016, 10 of which were documented between 2005-2013, and one historical observation from 1921. The nearest documented occurrence of Swainson’s hawk is one mile south of the project boundary, near Sand Creek.

Because of this, Swainson’s hawk has a moderate potential to occur on the site.

Western burrowing owl. There are approximately 50 documented occurrences of burrowing owl in the CNDDB within 5 miles of the project site. Ten of those occurrences are located within one mile of the site, with the closest occurrence being 875 feet east of the project boundary. Occurrences of this species have been documented as recently as 2018, with the earliest record dating back to 1993. No burrowing owls were observed at the project site during the May 27, 2021 field survey, which was conducted during the nesting period for this species. The site could provide suitable foraging habitat for burrowing owl and there is annual grassland and vacant lots adjacent to the site boundary that could provide foraging habitat for burrowing owl.

Numerous ground squirrel burrows present on site could be used for nesting and cover for burrowing owl; however, many of the burrows observed during the site visit were collapsed and did not exhibit suitable size dimensions to support burrowing owl. Potential burrowing owl sign (whitewash, a single downy feather, skeletal remains of rodents, and a remnant of an insect pellet) were observed around an asphalt pile that is located 50 feet west of the project site. None of the sign was recent and was not in a reasonable condition to definitively identify as burrowing owl sign. Roughly 10 burrows that appeared to be suitable for burrowing owl were located around the perimeter of the asphalt pile, however, most of the burrows looked collapsed and not currently suitable for use. Due to the number of burrowing owl records within close proximity to the site and the presence of numerous ground squirrel burrows onsite, there is a high potential for the species to occur at the site.

San Joaquin kit fox. The Project site is not located within modeled habitat for this species, and this species is unlikely to utilize the site due to a lack of suitable cover habitat (burrows/dens) and the level of development surrounding the site, including several large subdivisions and numerous roadways between suitable kit fox habitat in the area and the project site. There are three documented CNDDB occurrences of San Joaquin kit fox within five miles of the site; however, the records are from 1975, 1978, and 1995, and all are located more than four miles from the site. The occurrences are documented in large swaths of relatively undisturbed grassland near Marsh Creek/Camino Diablo, Contra Loma Regional Park, and Briones Valley Road.

Townsend’s big-eared bat. No suitable roosting habitat for Townsend’s big eared bat was observed on the site. A residential farmland property with a large abandoned barn is present across a road and south of the property; however, it is unknown whether this structure could provide suitable roosting habitat for this species, and it is on private property and therefore inaccessible.

Golden eagle. Grasslands within and surrounding the Project Area, and the rolling hills approximately 5 miles southwest of the site may provide suitable foraging habitat for golden eagle. Surrounding parcels that contain scattered large trees could provide suitable nesting habitat for golden eagles; however, the developed nature of the site and surrounding parcels to the west, north, and east likely precludes this species from occurring within

0.50 mile of the site.

Page 8 ends

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015

Page 9 ends

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
9) Covered and No-Take Plants
Please check the applicable boxes in Table 2b based on the land cover types found in the project area. If suitable land cover types are present on site, surveys must be conducted using approved CDFW/USFWS methods during the appropriate season for identification of covered and no-take species (see page 6-9 of the ECCC HCP/NCCP). Reference populations of covered and no-take plants should be visited, where possible, prior to conducting surveys to confirm that the plant species is visible and detectable at the time surveys are conducted. In order to complete all the necessary covered and no-take plant surveys, spring, summer, and fall surveys may be required.

Table 2b. Covered and No-Take Plant Species
Plant Species
Covered
(C) or NoTake (N)Associated Land
Cover Type
Typical Habitat or Physical Conditions, if
Known
Typical Blooming
Period
Suitable Land
Cover Type
Present
Adobe navarretia
(Navarretia nigelliformis ssp.
radians)
a
C Annual Grassland Generally found on clay barrens in
Annual Grassland b
Apr–Jun Yes
No
Alkali milkvetch
(Astragalus tener ssp. tener)
N Alkali grassland
Alkali wetland
Annual grassland
Seasonal wetland
Generally found in vernally moist habitat
in soils with a slight to strongly elevated
pH
Mar–Jun Yes
No
Big tarplant
(Blepharizonia plumosa)
C Annual grassland Elevation below 1500 feet d most often on Altamont Series or Complex soils
Jul–Oct Yes
No
Brewer’s dwarf flax
(Hesperolinon breweri)
C Annual grassland
Chaparral and scrub
Oak savanna
Oak woodland
Generally, restricted to grassland areas
within a 500+ buffer from oak woodland
and/or chaparral/scrub d
May–Jul Yes
No
Brittlescale
(Atriplex depressa)
C Alkali grassland
Alkali wetland
Restricted to soils of the Pescadero or
Solano soil series; generally found in
southeastern region of plan area d
May–Oct Yes
No
Caper-fruited tropidocarpum
(Tropidocarpum capparideum)
N Alkali grassland Mar–Apr Yes
No
Contra Costa goldfields
(Lasthenia conjugens)
N Alkali grassland
Alkali wetland
Annual grassland
Seasonal wetland
Generally found in vernal pools Mar–Jun Yes
No
Diablo Helianthella
(Helianthella castanea)
C Chaparral and scrub
Oak savanna
Oak woodland
Elevations generally above 650 feet d Mar–Jun Yes
No
Diamond-petaled poppy
(Eschscholzia rhombipetala)
N Annual grassland Mar–Apr Yes
No
Large-flowered fiddleneck
(Amsinckia grandiflora)
N Annual grassland Generally on clay soil Apr–May Yes
No
Mount Diablo buckwheat
(Eriogonum truncatum)
N Annual grassland
Chaparral and scrub
Ecotone of grassland and chaparral/scrub Apr–Sep Yes
No
Mount Diablo fairy-lantern
(Calochortus pulchellus)
C Annual grassland
Chaparral and scrub
Oak savanna
Oak woodland
Elevations generally between 650 and
2,600d
Apr–Jun Yes
No
Mount Diablo Manzanita
(Arctostaphylos auriculata)
C Chaparral and scrub Elevations generally between 700 and 1,860 feet; restricted to the eastern and
northern flanks of Mt. Diablo d and the
vicinity of Black Diamond Mines
Jan–Mar Yes
No
Recurved larkspur
(Delphinium recurvatum)
C Alkali grassland
Alkali wetland
Mar–Jun Yes
No
Round-leaved filaree
(California macrophylla)
c
C Annual grassland Mar–May Yes
No
San Joaquin spearscale
(Extriplex joaquiniana)
e
C Alkali grassland
Alkali wetland
Apr–Oct Yes
No

Page 10 ends

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
Showy madia
(Madia radiata)
C Annual grassland
Oak savanna
Oak woodland
Primarily occupies open grassland or
grassland on edge of oak woodland
Mar–May Yes
No
a The species Navarretia nigelliformis subsp. nigelliformis is no longer considered to occur within Contra Costa County based on specimen annotations at the UC and Jepson Herbaria at the University of California Berkeley as well as the opinions of experts in the genus. This taxon is now recognized as Navarretia nigelliformis subsp. radians. Any subspecies of Navarretia nigelliformis encountered as a part of botanical surveys in support of a PSR should be considered as covered under this HCP/NCCP. b Habitat for the Navarretia nigelliformis subspecies that occurs within the inventory are is inaccurately described in the HCP/NCCP as vernal pools. The entity within the Inventory generally occupies clay barrens within Annual Grassland habitat, which is an upland habitat type. c From California Native Plant Society. 2007. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v7-07d). Sacramento, CA. Species may be identifiable outside of the typical blooming period; a professional botanist shall determine if a covered or no take plant occurs on the project site. Reference population of covered and no-take plants should be visited, where possible, prior to conducting surveys to confirm that the plant is visible and detectable at the time surveys are conducted. d See Species Profiles in Appendix D of the Final HCP/NCCP. Reference populations of covered and no-take plants should be visited, where possible, prior to conducting surveys to confirm that the plant species is visible and detectable at the time surveys are conducted. e In the recent update to the Jepson eflora (JFP 2013) Atriplex joaquinana has been circumscribed and segregated into a new genus called Extriplex based on the work of Elizabeth Zacharias and Bruce Baldwin (2010). The etymology of the genus Extriplex means, “beyond or outside Atriplex”.

Page 11 ends

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
10) Results of Covered and No-Take Plant Species
Provide a written summary describing the results of the planning surveys conducted as required in Table 2b.

Describe the methods used to survey the site for all covered and no-take plants, including the dates and times of all surveys conducted (see Tables 3-8 and 6-5 of the ECCC HCP/NCCP for covered and no-take plants), including reference populations visited prior to conducting surveys.

If any covered or no-take plant species were found, include the following information in the results summary:
• Description and number of occurrences and their rough population size. • Description of the “health” of each occurrence, as defined on pages 5-49 and 5-50 of the HCP/NCCP. • A map of all the occurrences.
• Justification of surveying time window, if outside of the plant’s blooming period. • The CNDDB form(s) submitted to CDFW (if this is a new occurrence). • A description of the anticipated impacts that the covered activity will have on the occurrence and how the project will avoid impacts to all covered and no-take plant species. If impacts to covered plant species cannot be avoided and plants will be removed by covered activity, the Conservancy must be notified and has the option to salvage the covered plants. All projects must demonstrate avoidance of all six no-take plants (see table 6-5 of the HCP/NCCP).

Suitable habitat for the covered plant species described above was not observed in the Project Area. The prior history of agricultural land use, recent disking, and dominance of non-native species is indicative of disturbed habitat on the site, which is most often unsuitable for these special-status plant species due to competition from robust, non-native species and disturbance of plant roots and germination periods during the growing season. In addition, related taxa with similar life history characteristics were not present in the Project Area, lending further support for the absence of these plants. These factors provide justification for not performing surveys for covered/no-take plant species under this project.

Page 12 ends

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
IV. SPECIES-SPECIFIC AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION REQUIREMENTS Please complete and/or provide the following attachments:
1) Species-Specific Avoidance and Minimization for Selected Covered Wildlife Complete the following table and check the applicable box for covered species determined by the planning surveys.

Table 3. Summary of Applicable Preconstruction Surveys, Avoidance and Minimization, and Construction Monitoring Requirements10
Species Preconstruction Survey
Requirements
Avoidance and Minimization
Requirements Construction Monitoring Required Info in HCP San
Joaquin
kit fox
• On project footprint and 250-ft
radius, map all dens (>5 in.
diameter) and determine status
• Provide written survey results
to USFWS within 5 working
days after surveying
• Monitor dens
• Destroy unoccupied dens
• Discourage use of occupied (nonnatal) dens
• Establish exclusion zones ( >50 ft
for potential dens, and >100 ft for
known dens)
• Notify USFWS of occupied natal
dens
pp. 6-37
to 6-38
Western
burrowing
owl
• On project footprint and 500-ft
radius, identify and map all
owls and burrows, and
determine status
• Document use of habitat (e.g.
breeding, foraging)
• Avoid occupied nests during
breeding season (Feb-Sep)
• Avoid occupied burrows during
nonbreeding season (Sep – Feb)
• Install one-way doors in occupied
burrow (if avoidance not possible)
• Monitor burrows with doors
installed
• Establish buffer zones (250 ft
around nests)
• Establish buffer zones (160 ft
around burrows)
pp. 6-39
to 6-41
Giant
garter
snake
• Delineate aquatic habitat up to
200 ft from water’s edge on
each side
• Document any occurrences
• Limit construction to Oct-May
• Dewater habitat April 15 – Sep 30
prior to construction
• Minimize clearing for construction
• Delineate 200 ft buffer around
potential habitat near construction
• Provide field report on monitoring
efforts
• Stop construction activities if
snake is encountered; allow snake
to passively relocate
• Remove temporary fill or debris
from construction site
• Mandatory training for
construction personnel
pp. 6-43
to 6-45
California
tiger
salamander
• Provide written notification to
USFWS and CDFW regarding
timing of construction and
likelihood of occurrence on site
• Allow agency staff to translocate
species, if requested
• None p. 6-45
California
red-legged
frog
• Provide written notification to
USFWS and CDFW regarding
timing of construction and
likelihood of occurrence on site
• Allow agency staff to translocate
species, if requested
• None p. 6-46
Covered
shrimp
• Establish presence/absence
• Document and evaluate use of
all habitat features (e.g. vernal
pools, rock outcrops)
• Establish buffer near construction
activities
• Prohibit incompatible activities
• Establish buffer around outer edge
of all hydric vegetation associated
with habitat (50 ft or immediate
watershed, whichever is larger)
• Mandatory training for
construction personnel
pp. 6-46
to 6-48
Townsend’s
big-eared
bat
• Establish presence/absence
• Determine if potential sites
were recently occupied (guano)
• Seal hibernacula before Nov
• Seal nursery sites before April
• Delay construction near occupied
sites until hibernation or nursery
seasons are over
• None pp. 6-36
to 6-37
Swainson’s
hawk
• Determine whether potential
nests are occupied
• No construction within 1,000 ft of
occupied nests within breeding
season (March 15 - Sep 15)
• If necessary, remove active nest
tree after nesting season to
prevent occupancy in second year.
• Establish 1,000 ft buffer around
active nest and monitor
compliance (no activity within
established buffer)
pp. 6-41
to 6-43
Golden
Eagle
• Establish presence/absence of
nesting eagles
• No construction within ½ mile near
active nests (most activity late Jan
– Aug)
• Establish ½ mile buffer around
active nest and monitor
compliance with buffer
pp. 6-38
to 6-39
10 The requirements in this table are not comprehensive; they are detailed in the next section on the following page.

Page 13 ends

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
2) Required Preconstruction Surveys, Avoidance and Minimization, and Construction Monitoring All preconstruction surveys shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section 6.4.3, Species-Level Measures, and Table 6-1 of the ECCC HCP/NCCP. Detailed descriptions of preconstruction surveys, avoidance and minimization, and construction monitoring applicable to each of the wildlife species in Table 3 are located below. Please remove the species-specific measures that do not apply to your project (highlight entire section and delete).

WESTERN BURROWING OWL
Preconstruction Surveys
Prior to any ground disturbance related to covered activities, a USFWS/CDFW- approved biologist will conduct a preconstruction survey in areas identified in the planning surveys as having potential burrowing owl habitat. The surveys will establish the presence or absence of western burrowing owl and/or habitat features and evaluate use by owls in accordance with CDFW survey guidelines (California Department of Fish and Game 1995).

On the parcel where the activity is proposed, the biologist will survey the proposed disturbance footprint and a 500- foot radius from the perimeter of the proposed footprint to identify burrows and owls. Adjacent parcels under different land ownership will not be surveyed. Surveys should take place near sunrise or sunset in accordance with CDFW guidelines. All burrows or burrowing owls will be identified and mapped. Surveys will take place no more than 30 days prior to construction. During the breeding season (February 1– August 31), surveys will document whether burrowing owls are nesting in or directly adjacent to disturbance areas. During the nonbreeding season (September 1–January 31), surveys will document whether burrowing owls are using habitat in or directly adjacent to any disturbance area. Survey results will be valid only for the season (breeding or nonbreeding) during which the survey is conducted.

Avoidance and Minimization and Construction Monitoring
This measure incorporates avoidance and minimization guidelines from CDFW’s Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (California Department of Fish and Game 1995).

If burrowing owls are found during the breeding season (February 1 – August 31), the project proponent will avoid all nest sites that could be disturbed by project construction during the remainder of the breeding season or while the nest is occupied by adults or young. Avoidance will include establishment of a non-disturbance buffer zone (described below). Construction may occur during the breeding season if a qualified biologist monitors the nest and determines that the birds have not begun egg-laying and incubation or that the juveniles from the occupied burrows have fledged. During the nonbreeding season (September 1 – January 31), the project proponent should avoid the owls and the burrows they are using, if possible. Avoidance will include the establishment of a buffer zone (described below).

During the breeding season, buffer zones of at least 250 feet in which no construction activities can occur will be established around each occupied burrow (nest site). Buffer zones of 160 feet will be established around each burrow being used during the nonbreeding season. The buffers will be delineated by highly visible, temporary construction fencing.

If occupied burrows for burrowing owls are not avoided, passive relocation will be implemented. Owls should be excluded from burrows in the immediate impact zone and within a 160-foot buffer zone by installing one-way doors in burrow entrances. These doors should be in place for 48 hours prior to excavation. The project area should be monitored daily for 1 week to confirm that the owl has abandoned the burrow. Whenever possible, burrows should be excavated using hand tools and refilled to prevent reoccupation (California Department of Fish and Game 1995).

Plastic tubing or a similar structure should be inserted in the tunnels during excavation to maintain an escape route for any owls inside the burrow.

SWAINSON’S HAWK
Preconstruction Survey
Prior to any ground disturbance related to covered activities that occurs during the nesting season (March 15– September 15), a qualified biologist will conduct a preconstruction survey no more than 1 month prior to

Page 14 ends

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
construction to establish whether Swainson’s hawk nests within 1,000 feet of the project site are occupied. If potentially occupied nests within 1,000 feet are off the project site, then their occupancy will be determined by observation from public roads or by observations of Swainson’s hawk activity (e.g., foraging) near the project site. If nests are occupied, minimization measures and construction monitoring are required (see below).

Avoidance and Minimization and Construction Monitoring
During the nesting season (March 15–September 15), covered activities within 1,000 feet of occupied nests or nests under construction will be prohibited to prevent nest abandonment. If site-specific conditions or the nature of the covered activity (e.g., steep topography, dense vegetation, limited activities) indicate that a smaller buffer could be used, the Implementing Entity will coordinate with CDFW/USFWS to determine the appropriate buffer size.

If young fledge prior to September 15, covered activities can proceed normally. If the active nest site is shielded from view and noise from the project site by other development, topography, or other features, the project applicant can apply to the Implementing Entity for a waiver of this avoidance measure. Any waiver must also be approved by USFWS and CDFW. While the nest is occupied, activities outside the buffer can take place.

All active nest trees will be preserved on site, if feasible. Nest trees, including non-native trees, lost to covered activities will be mitigated by the project proponent according to the requirements below.

Mitigation for Loss of Nest Trees
The loss of non-riparian Swainson’s hawk nest trees will be mitigated by the project proponent by:
• If feasible on-site, planting 15 saplings for every tree lost with the objective of having at least 5 mature trees established for every tree lost according to the requirements listed below.

AND either
1) Pay the Implementing Entity an additional fee to purchase, plant, maintain, and monitor 15 saplings on the HCP/NCCP Preserve System for every tree lost according to the requirements listed below, OR 2) The project proponent will plant, maintain, and monitor 15 saplings for every tree lost at a site to be approved by the Implementing Entity (e.g., within an HCP/NCCP Preserve or existing open space linked to HCP/NCCP preserves), according to the requirements listed below.

The following requirements will be met for all planting options:
• Tree survival shall be monitored at least annually for 5 years, then every other year until year 12. All trees lost during the first 5 years will be replaced. Success will be reached at the end of 12 years if at least 5 trees per tree lost survive without supplemental irrigation or protection from herbivory. Trees must also survive for at least three years without irrigation.
• Irrigation and fencing to protect from deer and other herbivores may be needed for the first several years to ensure maximum tree survival.
• Native trees suitable for this site should be planted. When site conditions permit, a variety of native trees will be planted for each tree lost to provide trees with different growth rates, maturation, and life span, and to provide a variety of tree canopy structures for Swainson’s hawk. This variety will help to ensure that nest trees will be available in the short term (5-10 years for cottonwoods and willows) and in the long term (e.g., Valley oak, sycamore). This will also minimize the temporal loss of nest trees. • Riparian woodland restoration conducted as a result of covered activities (i.e., loss of riparian woodland) can be used to offset the nest tree planting requirement above, if the nest trees are riparian species. • Whenever feasible and when site conditions permit, trees should be planted in clumps together or with existing trees to provide larger areas of suitable nesting habitat and to create a natural buffer between nest trees and adjacent development (if plantings occur on the development site). • Whenever feasible, plantings on the site should occur closest to suitable foraging habitat outside the UDA. • Trees planted in the HCP/NCCP preserves or other approved offsite location will occur within the known range of Swainson’s hawk in the inventory area and as close as possible to high-quality foraging habitat.

GOLDEN EAGLE

Page 15 ends

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
Preconstruction Survey
Prior to implementation of covered activities, a qualified biologist will conduct a preconstruction survey to establish whether nests of golden eagles are occupied (see Section 6.3.1, Planning Surveys). If nests are occupied, minimization requirements and construction monitoring will be required.

Avoidance and Minimization
Covered activities will be prohibited within 0.5 mile of active nests. Nests can be built and active at almost any time of the year, although mating and egg incubation occurs late January through August, with peak activity in March through July. If site-specific conditions or the nature of the covered activity (e.g., steep topography, dense vegetation, limited activities) indicate that a smaller buffer could be appropriate or that a larger buffer should be implemented, the Implementing Entity will coordinate with CDFW/USFWS to determine the appropriate buffer size.

Construction Monitoring
Construction monitoring will focus on ensuring that no covered activities occur within the buffer zone established around an active nest. Although no known golden eagle nest sites occur within or near the ULL, covered activities inside and outside of the Preserve System have the potential to disturb golden eagle nest sites. Construction monitoring will ensure that direct effects to golden eagles are minimized. 3) Construction Monitoring Plan
Before implementing a covered activity, the applicant will develop and submit a construction monitoring plan to the planning department of the local land use jurisdiction and the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy for review and approval. Elements of a brief construction monitoring plan will include the following:
• Results of planning and preconstruction surveys.11
• Description of avoidance and minimization measures to be implemented, including a description of project-specific refinements to the measures or additional measures not included in the HCP/NCCP. • Description of monitoring activities, including monitoring frequency and duration, and specific activities to be monitored.
• Description of the onsite authority of the construction monitor to modify implementation of the activity.

Check box to acknowledge this requirement.
11 If the preconstruction surveys do not trigger construction monitoring, results of preconstruction surveys should still be submitted to the local jurisdiction and the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy.

Page 16 ends

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
V. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS ON COVERED ACTIVITIES
1) Check off the HCP conservation measures that apply to the project.

APPLIES TO ALL PROJECTS
Conservation Measure 1.11. Avoid Direct Impacts on Extremely Rare Plants, Fully Protected Wildlife Species, or Migratory Birds. This conservation measure applies to all projects. All projects will avoid all impacts on extremely rare plants and fully protected species listed in Table 6-5 of the ECCC HCP/NCCP. See HCP pp. 6-23 to 6-25, and Table 6-5.

APPLIES TO PROJECTS THAT IMPACT COVERED PLANT SPECIES
Conservation Measure 3.10. Plant Salvage when Impacts are Unavoidable. This condition applies to projects that cannot avoid impacts on covered plants and help protect covered plants by prescribing salvage whenever avoidance of impacts is not feasible. Project proponents wishing to remove populations of covered plants must notify the Conservancy of their construction schedule to allow the Conservancy the option of salvaging the populations. See HCP pp. 6-48 to 6-50.

APPLIES TO PROJECTS THAT INCLUDE ARE ADJACENT TO STREAMS, PONDS, OR WETLANDS Conservation Measure 2.12. Wetland, Pond, and Stream Avoidance and Minimization. All projects will implement measures described in the HCP to avoid and minimize impacts on wetlands, ponds, streams, and riparian woodland/scrub. See HCP pp. 6-33 to 6-35.

APPLIES TO NEW DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
Conservation Measure 1.10. Maintain Hydrologic Conditions and Minimize Erosion. All new development must avoid or minimize direct and indirect impacts on local hydrological conditions and erosion by incorporating the applicable Provision C.3 Amendments of the Contra Costa County Clean Water Program’s (CCCCWP’s) amended NPDES Permit (order no. R2-2003-0022; permit no. CAS002912). The overall goal of this measure is to ensure that new development covered under the HCP has no or minimal adverse effects on downstream fisheries to avoid take of fish listed under ESA or CESA. See HCP pp. 6-21 to 6-22.

APPLIES TO NEW DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS THAT INCLUDE OR ARE ADJACENT TO STREAMS, PONDS, OR WETLANDS Conservation Measure 1.7. Establish Stream Setbacks. A stream setback will be applied to all development projects covered by the HCP according to the stream types listed in Table 6-2 of the HCP. See HCP pp. 6-15 to 6-18 and Table 6-2.

APPLIES TO NEW DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ADJACENT TO EXISTING PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, HCP PRESERVES, OR LIKELY HCP ACQUISITION SITES Conservation Measure 1.6. Minimize Development Footprint Adjacent to Open Space. Project applicants are encouraged to minimize their development footprint and set aside portions of their land to contribute to the HCP Preserve System. Land set aside that contributes to the HCP biological goals and objectives may be credited against development fees. See HCP pages 6-14 to 6-15.

Conservation Measure 1.8. Establish Fuel Management Buffer to Protect Preserves and Property. Buffer zones will provide a buffer between development and wildlands that allows adequate fuel management to minimize the risk of wildlife damage to property or to the preserve. The minimum buffer zone for new development is 100 feet. See HCP pages 6-18 to 6-19.

Conservation Measure 1.9. Incorporate Urban-Wildlife Interface Design Elements. These projects will incorporate design elements at the urban-wildlife interface to minimize the indirect impacts of development on the adjacent preserve. See HCP pp. 6-20 to 6-21.

APPLIES TO ROAD MAINTENANCE PROJECTS OUTSIDE THE UDA
Conservation Measure 1.12. Implement Best Management Practices for Rural Road Maintenance. Road maintenance activities have the potential to affect covered species by introducing sediment and other pollutants into downstream waterways, spreading invasive weeds, and disturbing breeding wildlife. In order to avoid and minimize these impacts, BMPs described in the HCP will be used where appropriate and feasible. See HCP pp. 6-25 to 6-26.

APPLIES TO NEW ROADS OR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS OUTSIDE THE UDA Conservation Measure 1.14. Design Requirements for Covered Roads Outside the Urban Development Area (UDA). New roads or road improvements outside the UDA have impacts on many covered species far beyond the direct impacts of their project footprints. To minimize the impacts of new, expanded, and improved roads in agricultural and natural areas of the inventory area, road and bridge construction projects will adopt siting, design, and construction requirements described in the HCP and listed in Table 6-6. See HCP pp. 6-27 to 6-33 and Table 6-6.

APPLIES TO FLOOD CONTROL MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES
Conservation Measure 1.13. Implement Best Management Practices for Flood Control Facility Maintenance. Flood control maintenance activities have the potential to affect covered species by introducing sediment and other pollutants into downstream waterways and disturbing breeding wildlife. In order to avoid and minimize these impacts, BMPs described in the HCP will be used where appropriate and feasible. See HCP pp. 6-26 to 6-27.

Page 17 ends

Planning Survey Report Form, Revised July 2015
2) For all checked conservation measures, describe how the project will comply with each measure.

Attach as Attachment C: Project Compliance to HCP Conditions.

VI. MITIGATION MEASURES
1) Mitigation Fee Calculator(s)
Complete and attach the fee calculator (use permanent and/or temporary impact fee calculator as appropriate), and attach as Attachment D: Fee Calculator(s). 2) Briefly describe the amount of fees to be paid and when applicant plans to submit payment. 3) Based on the fee calculator, $436,709.17 is required to permit the project. This fee amount will be paid upfront, unless an agreement is made indicating differently.

Brentwood Costco Wholesale and Gas Station Project – PSR May 2022 Brentwood Costco Wholesale and Gas Station Project
East Contra Costa County HCP – PSR and Application Materials Attachment A – Project Description
Brentwood Costco Wholesale and Gas Station Project – PSR May 2022 Attachment A – Project Description
• The Project consists of development of 19.20-acres within two parcels (APN 019-020-073 and APN 019-020- 055; City application No. GPA 22-001, MS 351-22, CUP 22-001, DR22-002) that involves construction of a Costco Wholesale retail facility and associated gas station. Construction activities would include clearing and grubbing on the site, mass/fine grading, building pad preparation, pouring foundations, installation of site utilities, erection of the metal buildings, construction of curbs within the site, building slab and utility installation, and site paving. The main access routes would be from Lone Tree Plaza Drive via Canada Valley Road or Heidorn Ranch Road. The intersection of Heidorn Ranch and Lone Tree Plaza will be modified under the project for improved vehicular access to the site (shown in Attachment B, Figure 2). Staging of materials and equipment would be entirely on site, and no offsite staging would be necessary; however, a higher level of detail regarding the location and size of the staging area is to be determined. Underground utilities would be hooked up into existing connections. The project will utilize bioretention facilities to treat surface water, which will be collected in an underground stormwater vault where it is discharges to the City of Brentwood public stormwater system located in Lone Tree Plaza Drive.
• Proposed construction dates are from April 1, 2023 through September 30, 2023. Tentative phase details include the following:
 Construction start date: approximately April 1, 2023
 Opening: approximately Nov 2023
 Demolition/ Site Preparation (Clear and Grub and minimal Sidewalk demolition): 7 days  Grading: 50 days (20 days overlap with Building)
 Building Construction: 130 days
 Paving: 40 days (overlapping Building construction)
 Architectural coating: 50 days (this is within the building construction duration)  Total Project Duration: 180 Calendar Days
• Contra Costa County Conditional Use Permit Application Number: N/A (no submittals have been made as of 12/7/2021).
• General Best Management Practices (BMP’s) may include, but are not limited to: silt fencing, straw wattles, concrete washouts, stabilized spoil piles during rain events, and temporary fencing to secure the site, along with dust control, and gravel at construction entrances where required. The SWPPP plan will be followed as required, as well as any City requirements.
• The project will have no temporary impacts; therefore, no restoration will occur.

Brentwood Costco Wholesale and Gas Station Project – PSR May 2022 Brentwood Costco Wholesale and Gas Station Project
East Contra Costa County HCP – PSR and Application Materials Attachment B – Figures
Brentwood Costco Wholesale and Gas Station Project – PSR May 2022 Attachment B – Figures
Figure 1: Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2: Project Site Plans
Figure 3: Field Verified Land Cover Map
Figure 4: Photographs of Project Site
Figure 5: Planning Survey Species Habitat Maps
Service Layer Credits: National Geographic, Esri,
Garmin, HERE, UNEP-WCMC, USGS, NASA, ESA,
Project Location
Project
Location
^_ ±
0 300 600
Meters
Figure 1. Project Location
Brentwood Costco Wholesale
Contra Costa County, California
USGS 7.5' Quad: BRENTWOOD (1978)
Legal Description: T01N, R02E, SEC 3
Project Location
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
1 Inch = 2,000 Feet
Scale 1:24,000
Created By: C BARKERSWITZER Document Path: \\kleinfelder.com\shares\AUBURN-DATA\Share2\GIS-Graphics\GIS_Projects\20220783_T02_Brentwood_Costco\Figure1_BIO_Brentwood_Location_Vicinity.mxd ^_
Project Location
SOLANO
COUNTY

CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY
ALAMEDA Æÿ COUNTY 238
Æÿ12
Æÿ24
Æÿ160
Æÿ185
Æÿ242
Æÿ160
Æÿ4
Æÿ113
Æÿ4
Æÿ84
Æÿ12
Æÿ132
Æÿ33
§¨¦680
§¨¦580
§¨¦580
§¨¦ §¨¦5
80 §¨¦205
§¨¦680
?ÙE
Sand Creek
P
roject
Location ^_
Figure2.ProjectPlans
BrentwoodCostcoWholesale
ContraCostaCounty,California
±
03060M
eters
0100200F
eet
1Inch=200Feet
Scale
1:2,400
Created By: C. Barker-Switzer Document Path: \\kleinfelder.com\shares\AUBURN-DATA\Share2\GIS-Graphics\GIS_Projects\20220783_T02_Brentwood_Costco\Figure2_BIO_Brentwood_ProjectPlans.mxd S
erviceLayerCredits:©2022Microsoft
Corporation©2022Maxar©CNES(2022)
Project
Location ^_
±
03876M
eters
Figure3.LandCover
BrentwoodCostcoWholesale
ContraCostaCounty,California
ProjectArea
LandCover
FutureUrban
Road
0125250F
eet
1Inch=250Feet
Scale
1:3,000
Created By: C BARKERSWITZER Document Path: \\kleinfelder.com\shares\AUBURN-DATA\Share2\GIS-Graphics\GIS_Projects\20220783_T02_Brentwood_Costco\Figure3_BIO_Brentwood_LandCover.mxd Project
Location
^_
Figure 4. Photos
Brentwood Costco Wholesale
Contra Costa County, California

Page 1 of 2 ends

Created By: C BARKERSWITZER Document Path: \\kleinfelder.com\shares\AUBURN-DATA\Share2\GIS-Graphics\GIS_Projects\20220783_T02_Brentwood_Costco\Figure4_BIO_Brentwood_Photos.mxd Photo 1. View of commercial property north of
project site, facing north.

Photo 2. View of residential areas west of project
site, facing west.

Photo 3. View of farmland property and tree
stands south of project site, facing south.

Photo 4. View of asphalt pile located near
southeast side of parcel, with ground squirrel
burrows present around base.

Project
Location
^_
Figure 4. Photos
Brentwood Costco Wholesale
Contra Costa County, California

Page 2 of 2 ends

Created By: C BARKERSWITZER Document Path: \\kleinfelder.com\shares\AUBURN-DATA\Share2\GIS-Graphics\GIS_Projects\20220783_T02_Brentwood_Costco\Figure4_BIO_Brentwood_Photos_02.mxd Photo 5. One of many ground squirrel burrows
located throughout the project site.

Photo 6. Concrete drainage ditch that traverses
the site, facing north.

Photo 7. Eastern edge of parcel where concrete
drainage ditch meets Highway 4, facing south.

Service Layer Credits: © 2022 Microsoft
Corporation © 2022 Maxar ©CNES (2022)
Project
Location
^_ ±
0 150 300
Meters
Figure 5. Planning Survey
Species Habitat
Brentwood Costco Wholesale
Contra Costa County, California
Project Area
Burrowing Owl Preconstruction Survey Area
Tree to Survey
!( Swainson's Hawk
!( Golden Eagle
Planning Survey Radius
Burrowing Owl
Swaison's Hawk
Golden Eagle
0 500 1,000
Feet
1 Inch = 1,000 Feet
Scale 1:12,000
Created By: C BARKERSWITZER Document Path: \\kleinfelder.com\shares\AUBURN-DATA\Share2\GIS-Graphics\GIS_Projects\20220783_T02_Brentwood_Costco\Figure5_BIO_Brentwood_PlanningSurveySpeciesHabitat.mxd Brentwood Costco Wholesale and Gas Station Project – PSR May 2022 Brentwood Costco Wholesale and Gas Station Project
East Contra Costa County HCP – PSR and Application Materials Attachment C – Project Compliance to HCP Conditions
Brentwood Costco Wholesale and Gas Station Project – PSR May 2022 Attachment C – Project Compliance to HCP Conditions
Conservation Measure 1.11. Avoid Direct Impacts on Extremely Rare Plants, Fully Protected Wildlife Species, or Migratory Birds. This conservation measure applies to all projects. All projects will avoid all impacts on extremely rare plants and fully protected species listed in Table 6-5 of the ECCC HCP/NCCP.

See HCP pp. 6-23 to 6-25, and Table 6-5.

The project applicant will comply with this measure by implementing the following strategies:

1. No extremely rare plants were observed on the site, and none are expected due to a lack of suitable habitat for these species and the disturbed nature of the site. No extremely rare plants have been documented within or adjacent to the site.

2. A preconstruction nesting bird survey will be implemented one week prior to construction to identify any active nests of bird species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, California Department of Fish and Game Code 3503.5, and CDFW. The three fully protected species included in the HCP (golden eagle, white-tailed kite, and peregrine falcon) will be included in these surveys.

Conservation Measure 1.10. Maintain Hydrologic Conditions and Minimize Erosion. All new development must avoid or minimize direct and indirect impacts on local hydrological conditions and erosion by incorporating the applicable Provision C.3 Amendments of the Contra Costa County Clean Water Program’s (CCCCWP’s) amended NPDES Permit (order no. R2-2003-0022; permit no. CAS002912). The overall goal of this measure is to ensure that new development covered under the HCP has no or minimal adverse effects on downstream fisheries to avoid take of fish listed under ESA or CESA. See HCP pp. 6-21 to 6-22.

The project applicant will ensure that “Provision C.3 Amendments of the Contra Costa County Clean Water Program’s (CCCCWP’s) amended NPDES Permit (order no. R2-2003-0022; permit no. CAS002912)” will be adhered to for the duration of project construction, and that erosion will be minimized or avoided and hydrologic conditions will be maintained. This will be achieved by installing appropriate BMP’s throughout the Project Area, having spill kits on site during construction, and employing a biological construction monitor on the site during activities that have potential to affect biological resources.

Brentwood Costco Wholesale and Gas Station Project
East Contra Costa County HCP – PSR and Application Materials Attachment D – Fee Calculator
ECCC HCP/NCCP 2022 Fee Calculator Worksheet
Permanent Impacts
PROJECT APPLICANT:

PROJECT NAME:

APN(s):

JURISDICTION:

DATE:

DEVELOPMENT FEE

PERMANENT IMPACTS
(ACRES)
2022 FEE/ACRE
subject to change 1
Fee Zone 1 23.06 x $18,937.95 = $436,709.17
Fee Zone 2 x $37,875.90 = $0.00
Fee Zone 3 x $9,468.98 = $0.00
Fee Zone 42 x $28,406.93 = $0.00
Development Fee Total = $436,709.17

WETLAND MITIGATION FEE

PERMANENT IMPACTS
(ACRES)
2022 FEE/ACRE
subject to change 1
x $105,515.99 = $0.00
Perennial Wetland x $159,911.71 = $0.00
Seasonal Wetland x $374,220.31 = $0.00
Alkali Wetland x $378,310.21 = $0.00
Ponds x $205,923.71 = $0.00
Aquatic (open water) x $102,962.44 = $0.00
Slough / Channel x $147,029.10 = $0.00

STREAMS

PERMANENT IMPACTS
(LINEAR FEET)
2022 FEE/LINEAR FT
subject to change 1
x $542.59 = $0.00
x $814.47 = $0.00
Wetland Mitigation Fee Total = $0.00
FEE REDUCTION4 Development Fee reduction for land in lieu of fee = Development Fee reduction (up to 33% ) for permanent assessments = Wetland Mitigation Fee reduction for wetland restoration/creation performed by applicant = Reduction Total = $0.00
FINAL FEE CALCULATION Development Fee Total $436,709.17 Wetland Mitigation Fee Total + $0.00
Mitigation Fee Subtotal = $436,709.17
+
= $436,709.17
4 Fee reductions must be reviewed and approved by the Conservancy. 3 Per Chapter 9.3.1 of the HCP/NCCP, for every acre of impact on wetlands, streams, ponds, and riparian woodland/scrub, applicants will pay the appropriate development fee (according to fee zone) towards land acquisition and the conservation program as a whole, as well as a wetland mitigation fee to cover the costs of successful restoration or creation.

Impacts to riparian/scrub, wetlands, ponds,
aquatic, and slough/channel are charged
both a wetland mitigation fee and a
development fee. Please also include these
impact acres to development fee above.3
See appropriate ordinance or HCP/NCCP
Figure 9-1 to determine Fee Zone
March 10, 2022
Contribution to Recovery5
Streams greater than 25 feet wide

TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE PAID
2 Fee Zone 4 is not shown on Figure 9-1 of the HCP/NCCP but refers to the fee applicable to those few covered acitivities located in northeastern Antioch (p. 9-21). 1 Development fees are adjusted annually (no later than March 15 of each year) according to a formula that includes both a Home Price Index (HPI) and a Consumer Price Index (CPI). The Wetland Mitigation Fees are adjusted according to a CPI.

Streams 25 feet wide or less
5 Participating Special Entities (PSEs) are required to pay fees over and above permanent and temporary impact mitigation fees to cover indirect costs of extending permit coverage, including a portion of the costs of the initial preparation of the Plan, and a portion of the costs of conservation actions designed to contribute to species recovery. This amount will be determined in accordance with the Contribution to Recovery Implementation Policy adopted by the Conservancy Governing Board on December 8, 2014.

Riparian woodland / scrub
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Brentwood Costco Wholesale and Gas Station Project
019-020-073; 019-020-055
July 20, 2022
City of Brentwood

← All documents from this meeting