Integration and segregation patterns and trends
Appendix C,
Section II
Appendix
C.1, Section
II
C-19
C.1-7
Racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty Appendix C, Section II
Appendix
C.1, Section
II
C-19
C.1-30, C.1-
31 Disparities in access to opportunity Appendix C,
Section III
Appendix
C.1, Section
III
C-26
C.1-32-C.1-
48 Disproportionate housing needs within the jurisdiction, including displacement risk
Appendix C,
Section IV
Appendix
C.1, Section
Iv
C-29
C.1-49-C.1-
69 Part 3 Sites Inventory
Description of Requirement Chapter/
Section
Page
Number
ATTACHMENT 5
758
K.
APPENDIX F CITY OF BRISBANE 2023-2031 HOUSING ELEMENT
F-8
Did the element identify and evaluate (e.g., maps) the number of units, location and assumed affordability of identified sites throughout the community (i.e., lower, moderate, and above moderate income RHNA) relative to all components of the assessment of fair housing?
Appendix B
Sec. 7;
Appendix C,
Section V
B-17
C-33- C-40
Did the element analyze and conclude whether the identified sites improve or exacerbate conditions for each of the fair housing areas (integration and segregation, racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, areas of opportunity, disproportionate housing needs including displacement)? Chapter 3,
Section
3.1.1.2;
Appendix B
Sec. 3.4,
Appendix C,
Section V
3-2 – 3-3
B-5
C-33 – C-40
ATTACHMENT 5
759
K.
Housing Element Completeness Checklist 1/1/2021
APPENDIX F
F-9
Part 4 Identification of Contributing Factors
Description of Requirement Chapter/
Section
Page
Number
Did the element identify, evaluate, and prioritize the contributing factors to fair housing issues?
Appendix C,
Executive
Summary
C-7, C-11
Part 5 Goals and Actions Page
Description of Requirement Chapter/
Section
Page
Number
Did the element identify, goals and actions based on the identified and prioritized contributing factors?
Appendix C,
Executive
Summary
C-11
Do goals and actions address mobility enhancement, new housing choices and affordability in high opportunity areas, place-based strategies for preservation and revitalization, displacement protection and other program areas? Appendix C,
Executive
Summary
C-11
Affordable Housing Units At-Risk of Conversion to Market Rate Government Code section 65583, subdivision (a)(9)
See Preserving Existing Affordable Housing (https://www.hcd.ca.gov/policyresearch/preserving-existing-affordable-housing.shtml) Description of Requirement Chapter/
Section
Page
Number
Provide an inventory of units at-risk of conversion from affordable to market-rate rents within 10 years of the beginning of the planning period. The inventory must list each development by project name and address, the type of governmental assistance received, the earliest possible date of change from lowincome use, and the total number of elderly and nonelderly units that could be lost from the locality’s low-income housing stock in each year.
Chapter 5,
Section 5.1
5-1 to 5-2
Provide an estimate and comparison of replacement costs vs. preservation costs N/A; no cost associated
with
preserving
City’s at-risk
inventory
N/A
Identify qualified entities to acquire and manage affordable housing N/A; no acquisition
or changes
in
managemen
t of City’s atN/A
ATTACHMENT 5
760
K.
APPENDIX F CITY OF BRISBANE 2023-2031 HOUSING ELEMENT
F-10
risk
inventory.
Identify potential funding sources to preserve affordable housing N/A; no cost associated
with
preserving
City’s at-risk
inventory
N/A
ATTACHMENT 5
761
K.
Housing Element Completeness Checklist 1/1/2021
APPENDIX F
F-11
Analysis of Actual and Potential Governmental Constraints Government Code section, 65583, subdivisions (a)(5), (a)(4), (c)(1), and section 65583.2, subdivision (c)
See “Accessory Dwelling Unit Handbook” at HCD’s Accessory Dwelling Unit Assistance page (https://www.hcd.ca.gov/policy-research/accessorydwellingunits.shtml) Description of Requirement Chapter/
Section
Page
Number
Land use controls (e.g. parking, lot coverage, heights, unit size requirements, open space requirements, Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) requirements, floor area ratios, growth controls (e.g., caps on units or population or voter approval requirements, conformance with the requirements of SB 330), inclusionary requirements, consistency with State Density Bonus Law and Housing Accountability Act, and consistency with zoning and development standard website publication and transparency requirements pursuant to Gov. Code § 65940.1 subd. (a)(1)(B)).
Chapter 4,
Section 4.1.1
4-2 to
4-7
Local processing and permit procedures (e.g., typical processing times, permit types/requirements by housing type and zone, decision making criteria/findings, design/site/architectural review process and findings, description of standards [objective/subjective], planned development process). Element should also describe whether the jurisdiction has a process to accommodate SB 35 streamline applications and by-right applications for permanent supportive housing and navigation centers.
Chapter 4
Section 4.1.4
4-11 to
4-16
Building codes and their enforcement (e.g., current application of the California Building Code, any local amendments, and local code enforcement process and programs)
Chapter 4
Section 4.1.2
4-7 to 4-8
On and Off-Site improvement requirements (e.g., street widths, curbing requirements)
Chapter 4
Section 4.1.3
4-8 to 4-11
Fees and other exactions (e.g., list all fees regardless of entity collecting the fee, analyze all planning and impact fees for both single family and multifamily development, provided typical totals and proration to total development costs per square foot, and consistency with fee website publication and transparency requirements pursuant to Gov. Code § 65940.1 subd. (a)(1)(A)).
Chapter 4
Sections
4.1.1.4 4.1.4.1
Chapter 5,
Program
7.A.9
4-7
and
4-11 to 4-
14, 5-21
Housing for persons with disabilities (e.g. definition of family, concentrating/siting requirements for group homes, reasonable accommodation procedures, application of building codes and ADA requirements, zoning for group homes and community care facilities)
Chapter 4
Section 4.1.5
4-22 to 4-
24 Analysis of locally-adopted ordinances that directly impact the cost and supply of housing (e.g. inclusionary ordinance, short-term rental ordinance) Chapter 4
Section
4.1.1.2 4-2 to 4-6
ATTACHMENT 5
762
K.
APPENDIX F CITY OF BRISBANE 2023-2031 HOUSING ELEMENT
F-12
An Analysis of Potential and Actual Nongovernmental Constraints Government Code section, 65583, subdivision (a)(6)
Description of Requirement Chapter/
Section
Page
Number
Availability of financing Chapter 4
Section 4.2.3
4-20 to 4-22
Price of land Chapter 4
Section 4.2.1
4-18 to 4-19
Cost of Construction Chapter 4
Section 4.2.2
4-19 to 4-20
Requests to develop housing below identified densities in the sites inventory and analysis
Chapter 3
Sections 3.1.4
and 3.2.1.9
and
Chapter 4
Section
4.1.4.5 3-9 to 3-10
3-16
4-21
Typical timeframes between approval for a housing development project and application for building permits
Chapter 4
Section
4.1.4.2 4-14 to 4-
16 Zoning for a Variety of Housing Types
Government Code section, 65583, subdivisions (a)(4), (c)(1), and subdivision 65583.2 subdivision (c)
Provide an analysis of zoning and availability of sites for a variety of housing types including the following:
Description of Requirement Chapter/
Section
Page
Number
Multifamily Rental Housing Chapter 3,
Sections
3.2.3.2 and
3.3. Also see
Appendix D,
ABAG/MTC
Report,
Section 2
3-21 and 3-
24 D-6
Housing for Agricultural Employees (permanent and seasonal) (compliance with Health and Safety Code sections 17021.5, 17021.6, and 17021.8 Chapter 3,
Section 3.3
and
Chapter 2,
Section
2.1.13 3-24
2-10
Emergency Shelters(including compliance with new development/parking standards pursuant to AB 139/Gov. Code § 65583 subd. (a)(4)(A)).
Chapter 3,
Section
3-14
ATTACHMENT 5
763
K.
Housing Element Completeness Checklist 1/1/2021
APPENDIX F
F-13
3.2.1.7 Low Barrier Navigation Centers Chapter 3,
Section
3.2.1.7 3-14
Transitional Housing Chapter 3,
Sections
3.2.1.8,
3.2.1.10 3.3
3-15
3.2.1.10 3-24
Supportive Housing (including compliance with AB 2162, statutes of 2019) Chapter 3, Section
3.2.1.8,
3.2.1.10 and
3.3 3-15
3.2.1.10 3-24
Single-Room Occupancy Units Chapter 3,
Section 3.3
3-24
Manufactured homes, including compliance with Gov. Code § 65852.3 Chapter 3, Sections
3.2.1.8 and
3.3 3-15
3-24
Mobile Home Parks Chapter 3,
Section 3.3
3-24
Accessory Dwelling Units Chapter 3,
Sections
3.2.1.10 and
3.3 3-17
3-24
ATTACHMENT 5
764
K.
APPENDIX F CITY OF BRISBANE 2023-2031 HOUSING ELEMENT
F-14
Site Inventory and Analysis
Government Code, section 65583, subdivision (a)(3), section 65583.1, subdivision See “Housing Element Sites Inventory Guidebook” and “Default Density Standard Option” at HCD’s technical assistance memos (https://www.hcd.ca.gov/communitydevelopment/housing-element/housing-element-memos.shtml) See Site Inventory Form (https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/housingelement/docs/Site_inventory_template09022020.xlsm) and Site Inventory Form Instructions (https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/housingelement/docs/Site_inventory_instructions.pdf) Site Inventory – The site inventory must be prepared using the form adopted by HCD.
A electronic copy of the site inventory is due at the time the adopted housing element is submitted to HCD for review and can be sent to [email protected].
Site Inventory
Description of Requirement Chapter/
Section
Page
Number
Sites Inventory Form Listing: Parcel listing by parcel number, size, general plan and zoning, existing uses on non-vacant sites, realistic capacity, level of affordability by income group, publicly owned sites (optional).
Table B.7.2
Appendix B
B-22
Prior Identified Sites: Address whether sites are adequate to accommodate lower income needs based on identification in the prior planning period for nonvacant sites or two or more for vacant sites.
Table B.7.2
Appendix B
B-22
Map of sites Chapter 3,
Figure 3-1,
3-1.1, 3-1.2
(also within
Appendix B)
3-6 – 3-8
(also B-18 –
B-20)
Site Inventory Analysis and Methodology
Description of Requirement Chapter/
Section
Page
Number
RHNA Progress: List the number of pending, approved or permitted units by income group based on actual or anticipated sales prices and rents since the beginning of the projection period
Appendix A
Table A.2
A-6
Environmental Constraints: Address any known environmental or other constraints, conditions or circumstances, including mitigation measures, that impede development in the planning period
Chapter 4,
Sections
4.2.4 and
4.1.1.3,
Chapter 3,
Section 3.1,
Appendix B
3-2 to 3-4,
4-5 to 4-7,
4-29
ATTACHMENT 5
765
K.
Housing Element Completeness Checklist 1/1/2021
APPENDIX F
F-15
Appropriate density: Identification of zoning to accommodate RHNA for lowerincome households:
• Identify zones meeting the “default” density (Gov. Code § 65583.2 subd. (c)(3)(B)) or;
• Identify and analyze zones with densities less than the “deemed appropriate” (default) density that are appropriate to accommodate lower RHNA.
Chapter 3,
Section
3.1.2;
Appendix B
Sec. 4
3-3
B-6
ATTACHMENT 5
766
K.
APPENDIX F CITY OF BRISBANE 2023-2031 HOUSING ELEMENT
F-16
Description of Requirement Chapter/
Section
Page
Number
Capacity: Describe the methodology used in quantifying the number of units that can be accommodated on each APN:
• If development is required to meet a minimum density, identify the minimum density, or;
• Describe the methodology used to determine realistic capacity accounting for land use controls and site improvement requirements, typical density trends for projects of similar affordability, and current or planned infrastructure. • For sites with zones allowing non-residential uses, demonstrate the likelihood of residential development
Chapter 3,
Section
3.1.2;
Appendix B
Sec. 4
3-3
B-6
Infrastructure: Existing or planned infrastructure to accommodate the regional housing need, including water, sewer and dry utilities
Section 4.1.3
Programs
2.A.2
2.B.6
6.A.1
6.A.2
6.A.3
4-8 to 4.10
and
5-5 to 5-6,
5-14 to 5-15
Small and large sites: Sites identified to accommodate lower RHNA that are less than one-half acre or larger than 10 acres require analysis to establish they are adequate to accommodate the development of affordable units.
Chapter 3,
Section
3.1.2;
Appendix B
Sec. 4
3-3
B-6
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing: Identified sites throughout the community that affirmatively furthers fair housing (see page 5 of checklist) Chapter 3,
Sections
3.1.1.2,
3.1.3,
3.2.3,
3.2.3.3 3.3.
Chapter 5,
Goal 1
policies and
programs
and Goal 2
programs
2.A.2 and
2.B.1.
Appendix C
3-2, 3-9, 3-
20, 3-21, 3-
20 and 3-24
5-3 to 5-6
Appendix C,
C-37
through C44
ATTACHMENT 5
767
K.
Housing Element Completeness Checklist 1/1/2021
APPENDIX F
F-17
Nonvacant Sites Analysis: For nonvacant sites, demonstrate the potential and likelihood of additional development within the planning period based on extent to which existing uses may constitute an impediment to additional residential development, past experience with converting existing uses to higher density residential development, current market demand for the existing use, any existing leases or other contracts that would perpetuate the existing use or prevent redevelopment of the site for additional residential development, development trends, market conditions, and regulatory or other incentives or standards to encourage additional residential development on these sites Chapter 3,
Section
3.1.2;
Appendix B
Sec. 4
3-3
B-6
If nonvacant sites accommodate 50 percent or more of the lower-income RHNA, demonstrate the existing use is not an impediment to additional development and will likely discontinue in the planning period, including adopted findings based on substantial evidence.
N/A (see
Chapter 3,
Section
3.1.2;
Appendix B
Sec. 4.1 for
description)
3-3
B-9
Nonvacant sites that include residential units (either existing or demolished) that are/were occupied by, or subject to, affordability agreements for lower-income households within 5 years are subject to a housing replacement program. (Gov.
Code § 65583.2 subd. (g)(3))
N/A N/A
ATTACHMENT 5
768
K.
APPENDIX F CITY OF BRISBANE 2023-2031 HOUSING ELEMENT
F-18
Alternative Methods to Accommodate the RHNA: Optional
Description of Requirement Chapter/
Section
Page
Number
Accessory Dwelling Units: Analyze the number and affordability level of ADU units projected to be built within the planning period, including resources and incentives and other relevant factors such as potential constraints, and the likelihood of availability for rent
Chapter 3,
Section
3.2.1.5;
Appendix B
4.7 3-13
B-14
Existing Residential Units: number and affordability level of units rehabilitated, converted or preserved that meet the provisions of alternative adequate sites. In addition, this includes units in a motel, hotel, or hostel that are converted to residential units and made available to persons experiencing homelessness as part of a COVID-19 response and acquisition of mobile home park. If using this option, the adequate site alternative checklist must be provided.
N/A N/A
Other: Jurisdictions are encouraged to consult with HCD regarding other alternative methods options including new manufactured housing park hookups, floating homes/live aboard berths, conversion of military housing, adaptive reuse of commercial uses, or other housing opportunities unique to the community to ensure their adequacy to accommodate RHNA.
N/A N/A
Other Miscellaneous Requirements
Also see Technical Advisories issued by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research at:
New state legislation related to General Plans Appendix C (http://opr.ca.gov/docs/OPR_Appendix_C_final.pdf) and Fire Hazard Planning General Plan Technical Advice Series (http://opr.ca.gov/docs/Final_6.26.15.pdf) Description of Requirement Chapter/
Section
Page
Number
Description of the means by which consistency with the general plan will be achieved and maintained. (Gov. Code § 65583 subd. (c)(8)) Chapter 1,
Section 1.4
and Program
4.A.13
1-6 to 1-7
and
5-11
Description of construction, demolition, and conversion of housing for lowerand moderate-income households within the Coastal Zone (if applicable). (Gov.
Code § 65588 subds. (c) and (d))
N/A N/A
Description of opportunities for energy conservation in residential development. (Gov. Code § 65583 subd. (a)(8))
Chapter 5
Goal 6 and
subsequent
policies/prog
rams
5-14 and
5-15
Description of consistency with water and sewer priority requirements pursuant to SB 1087 (Gov. Code § 65589.7)
Chapter 4 &
5 And
Program
2.B.6
4-10 to 4-11
and
5-6
ATTACHMENT 5
769
K.
Housing Element Completeness Checklist 1/1/2021
APPENDIX F
F-19
Other elements of the general plan triggered by housing element adoption:
• Disadvantaged Communities (Gov. Code § 65302.10)
• Flood Hazard and Management (Gov. Code § 65302 subds. (d)(3) and (g)(2)(B))
• Fire Hazard (Gov. Code § 65302 and 65302.5)
• Environmental Justice (Gov. Code § 65302 subd. (h))
• Climate Adaptation
N/A N/A
ATTACHMENT 5
770
K.
APPENDIX F CITY OF BRISBANE 2023-2031 HOUSING ELEMENT
F-20
Schedule of Actions/Programs
Government Code, section 65583, subdivisions (c)(1 – 7), and (10) For adequate site programs See “Housing Element Sites Inventory Guidebook” at HCD’s technical assistance memos (https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/housingelement/housing-element-memos.shtml) Program Description Program numbers Page
number
Program(s) to provide adequate sites (large/small sites, incentives for mixed use/nonvacant sites, publicly owned sites, annexation, etc)
2.A.1, 2.A.2, 2.A.4, 2.B.1, 2.B.2,
2.B.4
5-5 and 5-6
If required: Program to accommodate a shortfall of
adequate sites to accommodate the lower RHNA. This
program must meet the specific criteria identified in Gov.
Code § 65583.2 subd.
(h) and (i).
2.A.2 5-5
If required: Program to accommodate an
unaccommodated need from the previous planning
period pursuant to Gov code § 65584.09
N/A N/A
If required: Program when vacant/nonvacant sites to
accommodate lower RHNA have been identified in
multiple housing elements, if needed. (Gov. Code §
65583.2 subd. (c))
N/A N/A
If required: Program to provide replacement units when
occupied by, or deed restricted to lower-income
households within the last 5 years, if needed. (Gov. Code § 65583.2 subd. (g)(3))
N/A N/A
Program(s) to assist in the development of housing to
accommodate extremely-low, very-low, low or moderateincome households, including special needs populations Chapter 5
All programs under Goal 2
5-5 to 5-9
Program to address governmental and nongovernmental
constraintsto the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing
Chapter 5
All programs under Goal 7
5-16
Program(s) to conserve and improve the condition of the existing affordable housing stock
Chapter 5
All programs under Goal 3
Applicable Programs under
Policy 4.A & 4.B,
5-9 to 5-12
Comments:
ATTACHMENT 5
771
K.
Housing Element Completeness Checklist 1/1/2021
APPENDIX F
F-21
Program Description Program numbers Page
number
Program(s) to promote and affirmative further fair housing opportunities
Chapter 5
All programs under Goal 1
5-3 and 5-4
Program(s) to preserve units at-risk of conversion from affordable to market-rate rents.
3.A.1
3.A.2
5-9
Program(s) to incentivize and promote the creation of accessory dwelling units that can be offered at an affordable rent.
2.D.2
2.E.2
2.E.3
5.A.1
5-7 to 5-8
and 5-12 to
5-13
Quantified Objectives
Government Code, section 65583, subdivisions (b)
For an example table addressing this requirement visit California Housing and Community Development Building Blocks (https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/buildingblocks/program-requirements/program-overview.shtml) Description of Requirement Chapter/
Section
Page
Number
Estimate the number of units likely to be constructed, rehabilitated and conserved or preserved by income level, including extremely low-income, during the planning period
Chapter 5,
Tables 5.1,
5.2 and 5.3
5-1 to 5-2
ATTACHMENT 5
772
K.
File Attachments for Item:
L. Sierra Point Open Space & Parks Planning and Marina and Sierra Point Sea Level Rise Resiliency
i. Receive overview from One Shoreline, San Mateo County’s Flood & Sea Level Resiliency District
ii. Marina and Sierra Point Utilities Response to Sea Level Rise ii. Sierra Point Open Space & Parks Master Plan Next Steps 773
L.
Sierra Point Open Space & Parks Master Plan Next Steps Page 1 of 4
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: May 18, 2023
From:Noreen Leek, Parks & Recreation Director
Subject: Sierra Point Open Space & Parks Master Plan Next Steps Community Goal/Result
Community Building
Purpose
Develop the City’s park system and public spaces for community interactions, enhance connectivity, and provide additional opportunities for recreation through the master planning process.
Recommendation
Receive process update and provide additional direction to staff for project next steps.
Background
The impetus for the Sierra Point Open Space and Parks master plan came from a 2017 agreement between the City of Brisbane and developer Sierra Point LLC. The agreement released the private interest in a lease on what is commonly referred to as Parcel R at the Marina in favor of the City. It also caused the developer to pay the City a one-time fee of $300,000 for park development at Parcel R and a fee paid at the time of building permit issuance of 50 cents per square foot, expected to generate another $225,000.
Additionally, the City and Healthpeak negotiated an amendment to Healthpeak's project (referred to as The Shore) to allow approximately 20,904 square feet of additional construction by connecting on three floors two of their existing buildings. In exchange, Healthpeak paid the City a one-time park development fee of $1.5 million. In total, the City expects to have a little over $2 million to commence park improvements at Sierra Point.
Additional funding will come from a park development impact fee that the City Council will review soon, which will charge a fee against new development and proceeds can be for any location of the City’s choosing. A master plan helps the City negotiate for the private investment of projects, still to be improved. Finally, the City’s existing Public Art Fund could also support implementation of art-related projects within the master plan.
In June 2021, the City issued a solicitation for Letters of Interest (LOI) from qualified Landscape Architects and Park Planning firms to develop an open space and parks master plan at Sierra Point. The solicitation noted the City’s aspiration to develop an open space and parks master plan at Sierra Point to meet the recreational needs of both Sierra Point tenants and the public and to promote integration with the surrounding areas like the City’s Marina, the San Francisco Bay Trail, and neighboring businesses.
The master planning effort serves to integrate new public spaces with existing and to-be-built private 774
L.
Sierra Point Open Space & Parks Master Plan Next Steps Page 2 of 4 areas. The vision for the project incorporates several acres of reimagined parks and open space on the eastern side of Sierra Point adjacent to the Marina.
Prospective firms were asked to demonstrate successful recent local experience in the design of open space and parks. Prior work with San Mateo County municipalities and/or one or more of the nine San Francisco Bay Area counties that resulted in a successfully developed park or open space plan of comparable size was preferred. Direct experience working with the Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) was noted as highly desirable given their jurisdiction over a portion of the site. A total of fifteen (15) LOI’s were received. The Council subcommittee reviewed these responses in October 2021 and selected four firms to place on the short list to move forward in the process: CMG, Hargreaves Jones, SWA, and TS Studio.
The Council subcommittee directed staff to draft a formal RFP to issue to the short-listed firms. The project ambitions as laid out in the RFP recognize the opportunities for increasing public benefit, addressing climate change, and meeting the challenges of sea level rise for underutilized waterfront public property. The firms who submitted responsive proposals included CMG, SWA, and TS Studio. Hargreaves Jones ultimately did not submit a proposal for the project due to staffing/project capacity.
In Spring 2022, the Council subcommittee reviewed & discussed the proposals and elected to conduct interviews with all three short-listed firms to inform their decision-making process. Following interviews, staff was directed to negotiate terms with the preferred prospective consultant, CMG Landscape Architecture, to refine their project scope and eliminate subconsultants subsequently reducing the cost of services. In July 2022, the City Council awarded the contract for the master planning of Sierra Point open space and parks to CMG Landscape Architecture, in the amount of $199,758. CMG began their work in the Fall of 2022 by conducting a series of meetings with City staff and the master planning subcommittee comprised of representatives from the Brisbane City Council, Parks and Recreation Commission, Open Space and Ecology Committee, Complete Streets Safety Committee, IDEA Committee, and Public Art Advisory Committee.
Task 1: Discovery Phase
The first task in this process was to conduct a comprehensive site analysis. Past studies and reports were reviewed, along with the Sierra Point Design Guidelines. City staff reviewed with the consultants various site constraints, including the SF Bay Conservation and Development Commission's (BCDC) regulations regarding the shoreline, the need to preserve parking, local weather/wind conditions, infrastructure and marina and yacht club operations to be maintained. In addition to meetings with the formal planning subcommittee, public outreach in this stage included a pop-up workshop at the annual Day in the Park event, as well as an online survey shared throughout the Brisbane community. The survey sought to understand how people currently engage with Sierra Point and their priorities for its future. Based on stakeholder engagement and community input, guiding principles and goals for the Sierra Point master plan were established to function as a framework for plan development to ensure proposals are aligned with client and stakeholder criteria.
The CMG team then drafted the first section of their report, Task 1: Discovery. The report collects, collates, and presents results of CMG’s preliminary engagement with stakeholders, review of project materials and resources, and site observations. While it does not and cannot capture every detail of the 775
L.
Sierra Point Open Space & Parks Master Plan Next Steps Page 3 of 4 conditions of Sierra Point, it provides the basis for their development of the Sierra Point Open Space and Parks Master Plan. Technical constraints, stakeholder ambitions, and open space improvement opportunities have been defined, and the conversation with stakeholders will continue as the process advances.
Task 2: Exploration
The Discovery phase provided the basis of Task 2: Exploration. This phase of master planning hinges on public engagement and includes initial development of alternative approaches to open space master plan concepts and coordination with stakeholders. The draft alternative schemes are intended to illustrate opportunities within the scope and to solicit stakeholder feedback for the creation of a preferred plan in Task 3: Resolution. Based on stakeholder input and best practices, preliminary concept designs attempt to define a context specific, welcoming, and inclusive open space. While they incorporate a wide variety of flexible, multi-purpose elements, the schemes also reflect stakeholder input to leverage, improve, and augment valued existing conditions, including preservation and enhancement of the Marina. The schemes describe alternative character, program and experience scenarios for public consideration. The overarching framework integrates a more “naturalistic” approach from north to south, with a primarily “functional” environment that captures the marina facilities, Harbor Master’s building and yacht club at the south. Each alternative concept proposes key infrastructure and connection points at elevations considered safe by regulatory agencies such as BCDC and OneShoreline, generally above the existing 17’ elevation. The design alternatives also propose additional responses to sea level rise, including fringing wetland planting on the bay edge resilient to rising water levels and to mitigate future storm surge impacts.
Discussion
Public engagement to date in the Exploration phase has included an open house workshop at City Hall on 1/31, an online survey which remains open, tabling at the Farmer’s Market on 2/16, and a meeting with the Sierra Point Yacht Club stakeholders on 2/21. This engagement builds on the on-line survey and Day in the Park engagement that solicited open space character and programming ideas from the community during the Discovery phase. Meetings, presentations, and stakeholder engagement requested by City stakeholders during the first two phases of the project have exceeded what was outlined in CMG’s project proposal, and it should be noted that CMG has reached its original financial allocation for engagement, presentations, and meetings in this phase. Therefore, if further engagement is desired, it will result in an additional service charge as outlined in Attachment 1. At this time, further direction is needed from Council with regards to the priorities for the remainder of the master planning process. If the Council wishes to revisit public engagement conducted during the first two phases of the project and broaden public engagement beyond the scope that was outlined in the City’s RFP and consultant’s proposal, the expanded public participation plan for this phase could include any of the following:
- An active working session with the full Council
- Additional onsite engagement at Sierra Point in the form of a community-wide event - Convening of a marina facilities focus group comprised of Sierra Point Yacht Club members and Brisbane Marina berth holders
- Stakeholder meetings with Sierra Point business representatives & property owners 776
L.
Sierra Point Open Space & Parks Master Plan Next Steps Page 4 of 4 - Expanded outreach to the broader Brisbane community
- Further engagement with the Sierra Point Master Planning Subcommittee (representatives from the Brisbane City Council, Parks and Recreation Commission, Open Space and Ecology Committee, Complete Streets Safety Committee, IDEA Committee, and the Public Art Advisory Committee.)
- Additional project coordination meetings with City staff based on the project duration extending from 5 months to 10 months.
In the third and final phase of the master planning process, the consultants will coalesce the input received in Tasks 1 & 2 to prepare for the third task: Resolution. Within that phase, CMG will recommend phased implementation of a preferred master plan. A master plan is the appropriate step to evaluate long term opportunities and constraints for public land to position the City to organize and pursue funding opportunities. The timing of phased implementation is driven by City priorities, access to funding, and technical and environmental necessity—primarily protection of facilities and infrastructure from sea level rise.
Fiscal Impact
The City Council Ad-hoc subcommittee met and is recommending a City Council workshop to be held in the Council Chambers in a horseshoe configuration. The purpose of the meeting would be soliciting community input on Sierra Point parks, open space and sea level planning. After this workshop, the City Council may provide direction regarding subsequent master planning steps.
The subcommittee, staff, and consultant have discussed an on-site workshop at Sierra Point to solicit input from users and a proactive conversation with property owners.
All of this would lead to final recommendations that would be reviewed by the expanded Sierra Point subcommittee which consists of two City Councilmembers and members of the Council committees and Commissions. After this review, the City Council will consider a plan for adoption.
Attachments
1. CMG: Detailed fee budget denoting possible additional service fees ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Noreen Leek, Parks & Recreation Director Clay Holstine, City Manager 777
L.
Table 1: Detailed Fee Budget
Principal LA-5 LA-4 LA-3 LA-2 LA-2 Task Fee Total Task Fee Hourly Rate $300 $220 $180 $165 $145 $145
Task 4: Meetings & Presentations
$ 89,190.00
SEPTEMBER
Scope Confirmation 1 1 1 $ 610.00
Staff Technical Committee Kick-Off Meeting 3 3 3 $ 1,830.00 Site Reconnaissance 3 3 3 $ 1,830.00
City GIS mtg 1 1 1 $ 610.00
Project Management Meetings 4 4 4 $ 2,440.00
SP Parkway Sub-Committee Kick-Off Meeting 3 3 3 $ 1,830.00 September Total 15 0 15 0 15 0 $ 9,150.00
OCTOBER
Day in the Park (Pop-Up Event) 6 7 8 $ 4,130.00
On-Line Survey 0.5 2 $ 432.50
BCDC Staff 1 1 1 $ 610.00
Project Management Meetings 2 1 2 $ 1,040.00
October Total 9.5 0 9 0 13 0 $ 6,212.50
NOVEMBER
SP Parkway Sub-Committee Site Walk 3 3 $ 1,290.00
Staff Technical Sub-committee meeting 2 2 $ 860.00
On-Line Survey Results 0.5 2 $ 432.50
Project Management Meetings 2 2 $ 860.00
November Total 7.5 0 0 0 9 0 $ 3,442.50
DECEMBER
Staff Technical Committee Alternative Concepts 3 3 $ 1,290.00 Project Management Meetings 1 1 $ 430.00
December Total 4 0 0 0 4 0 $ 1,720.00
JANUARY
SP Parkway Sub-Committee Alternative Concept Presentation 1.5 2 $ 740.00 Individual presentation - SP Parkway Sub-Committee prep 0.5 2 $ 440.00 Individual presentation - SP Parkway Sub-Committee 1 2 $ 590.00 On-Line Exploration Survey 1 4 $ 880.00
Public Event - Alternative Concepts Jan 31st Preparation 4 24 7 $ 5,695.00 Public Event - Alternative Concepts January 31st 4 8 8 4 $ 4,260.00 Project Management Meetings 4 4 $ 1,780.00
January Total 16 0 0 8 46 11 $ 14,385.00
FEBRUARY
Project Management Meetings 2 2 $ 890.00
Discovery document rework for public release & comment 0.5 4 $ 730.00 Meeting prep for introduction of new SPPP SC Member 1 6 $ 1,170.00 Project introduction for new SPPP SC Member 2 2 $ 890.00 Yacht Club Meetings Coord with Commodore 1 1 $ 445.00
Yacht Club Meeting Prep 2 8 $ 1,760.00
Yacht Club Event 3 3 $ 1,335.00
Pop-up event - Farmer's Market Prep 0 1 $ 145.00
Pop-up event - Farmer's Market 3 0 $ 900.00
February Total 14.5 0 0 0 27 0 $ 8,265.00
MARCH
Informal Master Plan Presentation - City Council - prep 2 8 $ 1,760.00 Informal Master Plan Presentation - City Council 5 5 $ 2,225.00 Project Review w Council Members - Colleen and Cliff - prep 0.5 1 $ 295.00 Project Review w Council Members - Colleen and Cliff 1 1 $ 445.00 Library display board set up & creation 0.25 2 $ 365.00 SPYC Advisory Committee Meeting Prep 1 2 $ 590.00
SPYC Advisory Committee #1 3 3 $ 1,335.00
SPYC Advisory Committee Meeting Prep 1 1 $ 445.00
SPYC Advisory Committee #2 3 3 $ 1,335.00
Property Owners meeting prep 1 2 $ 590.00
Property Owners meeting 1 1 $ 445.00
Small Craft Adovcate meetings 1 1 $ 445.00
Project Management Meetings 2 2 $ 890.00
March Total 21.75 0 0 0 32 0 $ 11,165.00
APRIL
Prep for 'Day At Sierra Point' - Community Outreach Event at SP 1 6 $ 1,170.00 Day at Sierra Point - Community Outreach Event at SP 5 8 $ 2,660.00 Intercept Survey/On-site pop-up event - prep 0.5 4 $ 730.00 Intercept Survey/On-site pop-up event of Sierra Point users 4 4 $ 1,780.00 Collate On-Line Survey Results & written feedback 2 $ 290.00 Project Management Meetings 2 2 $ 890.00
April Total 12.5 0 0 0 26 0 $ 7,520.00
MAY
Preparation for all draft plan presentations 0.5 8 8 $ 2,470.00 Staff Technical Committee DRAFT Final Concept Plan Presentation 1 1 0 $ 445.00 778
L.
Table 1: Detailed Fee Budget
SPP SC DRAFT Final Concept Plan Presentation 2 2 0 $ 890.00 Informal Master Plan Workshop - City Council - Prep 1 4 $ 880.00 Informal Master Plan Workshop - City Council 2 4 $ 1,180.00 BCDC staff meeting 1 1 $ 445.00
Project Management Meetings 2 2 $ 890.00
May Total 9.5 0 0 0 22 8 $ 7,200.00
JUNE
Preparation for all FINAL concept plan presentations 1 8 8 $ 2,620.00 Staff Technical Committee Final Concept Plan Presentation 2 2 $ 890.00 SP Parkway Sub-Committee Final Concept Plan Presentation 2 2 $ 890.00 BCDC DRB submission for July 2 8 8 $ 2,920.00
Project Management Meetings 2 2 $ 890.00
June Total 9 0 0 0 22 16 $ 8,210.00
JULY
FINAL Plan Review w City Council - prep 1 4 4 $ 1,460.00 FINAL Plan Review w City Council 2 4 $ 1,180.00
BCDC DRB prep 1 4 4 $ 1,460.00
BCDC DRB ** does not include prep time 3 3 $ 1,335.00
Formal Master Plan Presentation - City Council - Prep 0.5 8 $ 1,310.00 Formal Master Plan Presentation - City Council 4 4 $ 1,780.00 Master Plan Presentation Public - Prep 1 3 3 $ 1,170.00 Master Plan Presentation Public 3 3 $ 1,335.00
Project Management Meetings 2 2 $ 890.00
June Total 17.5 0 0 0 35 11 $ 11,920.00
Task 4: Sub-total 136.75 0 24 8 251 46 $89,190
Task 4: Consultant Proposal Estimated Fee
Task 4: Consultant Fee Avialable
$51,455
($37,735)
779
L.
M E M O R A N D U M
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Randy Breault, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Subject:
Date:
Marina and Sierra Point Utilities Response to Sea Level Rise for Council meeting of 5/18/23
Coincidental to receipt of the first update on the Sierra Point Open Space & Parks Master Plan and that document’s discussion of existing and anticipated future sea levels, the city desires to take a holistic look at two other major issues at Sierra Point: one, access to the area from Sierra Point Parkway, and two, needed response to sea level rise (SLR) to preserve city infrastructure.
With regards to access to Sierra Point from Sierra Point Parkway, the city will need to consult with Caltrans and confirm that state agency intends to protect the reach of US 101 within our city limits. Defense of this existing resource is critical to Brisbane and not just for access to Sierra Point; if US 101 were allowed to be flooded, then the water levels in the Brisbane Lagoon might get so high that they will prevent our stormwater lines from draining, which could result in significant flooding in the lower areas of central Brisbane. If we can confirm that Caltrans will protect US 101, then we will still need to complete engineering studies that may include installation of storm gates to prevent high San Francisco Bay water levels from reaching the Lagoon, in addition to a pumping station to reroute storm waters to prevent discharge from our storm drain system into the Lagoon overwhelming the storage capacity of the Lagoon.
During staff’s 3/30/23 meeting with Len Materman of One Shoreline, he offered to connect city staff with Caltrans staff working on the US 101 response to SLR.
City infrastructure at the eastern edge of Sierra Point includes the Marina (its gangways, slips, harbormaster’s office, jetty, seawall and restrooms) and public utilities (a water transmission main, sewer forcemain and sewer lift station), both located in an area that may be impacted by 2050. City staff had a meeting with State Coastal Conservancy (SCC) on 3/9/23, and they determined that the study we outlined for a response to SLR was possibly eligible for grant funding, and we are now working on the preapplication to SCC. Staff has also engaged a nearshore engineering firm, who we have asked to partner with a civil engineering firm to complete the study for which we are requesting grant funds from SCC.
CITY OF BRISBANE
Department of Public Works - 50 Park Place
Brisbane, California 94005-1310
(415) 508-2130
Fax (415) 467-5547
780
L.
File Attachments for Item:
M. Discuss Measure K Funding Requests to Supervisor Canepa and Provide Direction to the City Manager as to the Prioritization of Said Projects
781
M.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Recommendation for Measure K Funds Request Page 1 of 2
Meeting Date: May 18, 2023
From: Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Subject: Recommendation for Measure K Funds Request
Community Goal/Result
Ecological Sustainability
Purpose
To suggest a project for Supervisor Canepa’s consideration to fund from Measure K.
Recommendation
Discuss possible projects’ funding requests to Supervisor Canepa and provide direction to the City Manager as to the prioritization of said projects.
Background
The attached City Manager’s staff report from 5/4/23 details funding that is possibly available via Supervisor Canepa’s office from San Mateo County Measure K Discussion
Based on a cooperative 2018 Zero Net Energy Study with the Bay Area Renewable Energy Network, the city was able to identify funding opportunities to replace one of our largest mechanical users of fossil fuel (the community pool’s boiler) with electric heat pump water heaters (EHPs). As the existing boiler is near the end of its useful life, Council on 7/7/22 approved a cutting-edge design-build contract with Willdan Energy Solutions (WES).
The contract with WES included their role as designer, contractor and facilitator of city applications to external funding agencies. Based on requirements of one of the potential funding sources the total project cost has increased significantly. 1 Because of this increased
cost, staff has proposed a revised funding plan described below that includes a request to Supervisor Canepa.
1 The project originally retained the existing gas boiler for use in a “piggyback” mode on the few occasions when the EHPs could not fully warm the pool. The California Public Utility Commission has determined that the gas boiler must be completely replaced, which has resulted in an increased cost for EHP capacity and a new electric service in the amount of nearly $1M. The estimated cost of the project plus 10 % contingency is now $1.76M 1 of 3
782
M.
Recommendation for Measure K Funds Request Page 2 of 2
Fiscal Impact
Amount Source Notes
$118,394 Brisbane General Fund Approved by City Council 7/7/22 $375,000 California Energy Commission Energy
Conserva�on Assistance Act
1% interest 15-year loan to be paid back
by the City with es�mated savings from
heat source conversion
$200,000 Measure K Requires approval from Supervisor Canepa $285,000 PG&E GK12 Energy Efficiency Incen�ve Requires approval from California Public U�lity Commission’s Energy Division
$463,140 Peninsula Clean Energy Assumes a therm reduc�on value of $12/therm
$318,000 Peninsula Clean Energy Electrical upgrade incen�ve $1,759,534 TOTAL
Measure of Success
The replacement of fossil fuel powered heat pumps at the community pool and the associated significant reduction of GHG emissions and long-term cost savings.
Attachments
1. 5/4/23 city Manager staff report to Council
___________________________________ ___________________________________ Randy Breault, Public Works Director Clay Holstine, City Manager 2 of 3
783
M.
Measure K Page 1 of 1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: May 4, 2023
From: Clay Holstine, City Manager
Subject: Measure K funds from San Mateo County
Recommendation
Receive report and provide directions on next steps.
Measure K
Measure K is a half cent sales tax that was approved by voters of San Mateo County in 2016 for a period of twenty years. Measure K replace Measure A which was originally approved by voters in 2012.
The sales tax is currently projected to generate 110m in Fiscal Year 2023/24.
I recently met with our County Supervisor, David Canepa regarding funding for a Brisbane project. Each Supervisor is allotted up to $1m a year to support projects in their District. He indicated that a project of approximately 150k to 200k with City match would be of interest to him. He is looking for a “capital project” as opposed to a program. The idea being that a physical capital project will be enduring as opposed to a program are used up within a year.
The time for submittal of a project to his office is October of this year.
Next steps are for the City Council to discuss what process you wish to consider in developing a proposal.
Options could include but are not limited to the following:
• City Council Subcommittee (existing)
• City Council Ad-hoc subcommittee (New)
• One or more commissions of the city (more than one commission would set up a competition of ideas which may or may not be a good idea). • City Council agenda item to discuss as a group.
As stated above the Council may wish to pursue this in another fashion. The list above is provided to stimulate conversation.
___________________________________
Clay Holstine, City Manager
3 of 3
784
M.
File Attachments for Item:
O. Countywide Assignments and Subcommittee Reports
- Public Art Advisory Committee (5/1) Cunningham, Davis - Sierra Point Parkway Design Guidelines Subcommittee (5/3) Lentz, O’Connell 785
O.
CITY of BRISBANE
Subcommittee Update
From April 29th, 2023 to May 12th, 2023
Public Art Advisory Committee 5/1 Cunningham, Davis
The Committee received a presentation from Phase 3 regarding their proposed private art installation. The Committee members asked questions about the proposed artists and suggested that the art play on light and shadows and be representative of all genders. At a future meeting, Phase 3 will provide a complete package presentation including placement, scale, and budget.
Staff provided the quarterly Public Art Fund report showing $1.85M available. The Committee asked about any remaining amount committed for the Midtown Mural. Staff will follow up.
Staff presented the Final RFP review with process schedule before recommendation to Council. The Committee recommended unanimously to bring forward to Council at their 5/18 meeting.
The Committee reviewed and discussed the Art implementation guidelines. They discussed whether the ordinance could/should include a provision for performance-based (non-permanent) art. Staff was directed to investigate what other cities do and to receive guidance from the City Attorney. The Committee understands that any future proposed changes to the Guidelines/Ordinance requires Council approval.
The Committee discussed small scale projects including Sidewalk Chalk event, Film festival, revitalization of Firth Park art, Surprise Art, a “Push Pin” party as a “day in the life” of Brisbane, and a bench art project. The Committee wishes to clarify through the City Attorney whether non-permanent art events/displays can be facilitated within the existing guidelines. Staff will follow up.
Sierra Point Parkway Design Guidelines Subcommittee 5/3 Lentz, O’Connell Staff discussed with the subcommittee BDI’s Hotel and Biotech application that has been submitted. A concern is around pedestrian access and traffic circulation to/from and around the project. In response to the City, the applicant gave three different scenarios, but it doesn’t fully address all of the City’s concerns.
The subcommittee gave some suggestions (create a roundabout on south/east corner and cantilever the lower level on the westside) and direction (no entry/exit to be on City property on eastside) to staff to assist the applicant through the process.
Upcoming Subcommittees:
Transportation Demand Management Policy
Subcommittee 5/24 1:30pm Cunningham, Lentz
Public Art Advisory Committee 6/26 4:30pm Cunningham, Davis 786
O.