Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Brisbane City Council
May 24, 2023

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
May 24, 2023
Body
Brisbane City Council
Original file
1.7 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on brisbaneca.api.civicclerk.com. That file is the official record.

- 1 -
CITY of BRISBANE
Wednesday, May 24th, 2023 at 1:30PM ● Hybrid Meeting
Brisbane City Hall | 50 Park Place, Brisbane, CA.

The public may observe/participate in the Subcommittee meetings by using remote public comment options or attending in person. Subcommittee members shall attend in person unless remote participation is permitted by law. The Subcommittee may take action on any item listed in the agenda.

JOIN IN PERSON
Location: 50 Park Place, Brisbane, CA 94005 - Large Conference Room Masks are no longer required but are highly recommended in accordance with California Department of Health Guidelines. To maintain public health and safety, please do not attend in person if you are experiencing symptoms associated with COVID-19 or respiratory illness.

JOIN VIRTUALLY
Join Zoom Webinar (please use the latest version: zoom.us/download):
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/83011050942?pwd=MHpYUUxlQ25veTU5VU5TNTVpb1JNdz09 Meeting ID: 830 1105 0942
Passcode: 123456
Call In Number: 1 (669) 900-9128
Note: Callers dial *9 to “raise hand” and dial *6 to mute/unmute.

The agenda materials may be viewed online at www.brisbaneca.org at least 72 hours prior to a Meeting.

Please be advised that if there are technological difficulties, the meeting will nevertheless continue.

TO ADDRESS THE SUBCOMMITTEE

IN PERSON PARTICIPATION
To address the Subcommittee on any item on or not on the posted agenda, please wait until Public Comments are being accepted.

REMOTE PARTICIPATION
Members of the public may observe/participate in the Committee meeting by logging into the Zoom Webinar.

Aside from commenting while in the Zoom meeting, the following email line will be monitored during the meeting, and public comments received will be noted for the record during Public Comment or during an Item.

Email: [email protected]

SPECIAL ASSISTANCE
If you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact Angel Ibarra at (415) 508-2109.

Notification in advance of the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

Transportation Demand Management
Subcommittee Agenda
1 - 2 -
SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERS:

Councilmember Cunningham, Councilmember Lentz

ROLL CALL
A. Consider any request of a City Councilmember to attend the meeting remotely under the “Emergency Circumstances” of AB 2449

PRESENTATIONS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS
B. Review of Draft Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance

PUBLIC COMMENT

ADJOURNMENT
2 File Attachments for Item:

B. Review of Draft Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance 3 B.
1 MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 24, 2023
TO: Transportation Demand Policy Subcommittee
FROM: John Swiecki, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Review of Draft Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance

BACKGROUND
In 2021, the Transportation Demand Policy Subcommittee discussed the implications of C/CAG’s new TDM policy, effective as of January 1, 2022, potential Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies at Sierra Point, and whether a Brisbane-specific TDM ordinance would more effectively result in trip reduction and mode shift than simply relying on a countywide C/CAG policy. Subsequently, in February 2022 the subcommittee directed staff to move forward with transportation consultant Fehr & Peers to create a TDM strategy for Brisbane to be more responsive to our unique challenges and opportunities.

DISCUSSION
TDM Strategy for the City of Brisbane
The attached strategy document provides a TDM Strategy for the City of Brisbane and includes a draft TDM Ordinance along with implementation measures related to planning and monitoring TDM measures.

The draft ordinance would replace and supersede Brisbane Municipal Code Chapter 10.52 in its entirety. Projects consistent with the draft TDM Ordinance, would be considered consistent with both General Plan Policy C.38, and its implementing programs, as well as the C/CAG TDM Policy.

While it builds upon C/CAG’s countywide approach, requirements of the draft ordinance are tailored to the City of Brisbane and it would also capture more projects that would otherwise not be subject to C/CAG’s countywide TDM policy.

Table A of Attachment 1 summarizes the similarities and differences between C/CAG’s and proposed City requirements to increase non-auto mode share and reduce drive-alone trips.

Generally, office/R&D projects, which comprise the primary generator of peak period commute trips and vehicle miles traveled within the City, would be required to achieve a higher non-auto mode share under the draft TDM Ordinance than under C/CAG’s recommendations (52 percent drive alone, compared to 67 percent to 73 percent under C/CAG). Large office/R&D projects would also be subject to more frequent surveys, vehicle counts, and enforcement under the draft Ordinance versus C/CAG’s policy.
4 B.
2 Draft Ordinance Applicability and Requirements
As indicated previously, the draft Ordinance would apply to more projects than required under C/CAG’s TDM policy, which only includes projects that generate 100 or more average daily trips.

In addition to the above threshold, any nonresidential project applying for a building permit with improvements that exceed $500,000 in construction costs and any project involving additions or alterations to a building, which calculated together or apart, constitute 50 percent of the preexisting floor area of the building would also be subject to the draft Ordinance.

All projects subject to the requirements of the draft Ordinance would be required to incorporate trip reduction measures, based on a tiered system. Tier 1 includes uses with the least impact on TDM, Tier 2 uses would be in the middle with regards to traffic impacts, and Tier 3 uses have the greatest impacts; applicability and TDM requirements are briefly summarized below:
• Tier 1: These projects would include uses that have a very limited impact on peak period commute trips, such as residential and certain nonresidential uses that do not qualify as Tier 2 or 3. These projects would be subject to a limited number of TDM measures, such as participation in Commute.org trip reduction programs, and annual reporting for a few years.
• Tier 2: This tier generally would include most commercial uses found within Crocker Park, such as warehousing, and all office/R&D uses (citywide) between 10,000 and 50,000 square feet. These projects would be subject to all Tier 1 TDM measures plus additional TDM measures, such as providing financial contributions to Commute.org’s shuttle operations, and more rigorous annual reporting requirements. • Tier 3: This is the most stringent tier and would include all office/R&D uses in the City larger than 50,000 square feet; the primary generators of peak period commute trips and vehicle miles traveled in the City. These projects would be subject to all Tier 1 and Tier 2 TDM measures plus additional measures to be documented within a TDM plan and even more rigorous annual reporting requirements to be performed in perpetuity.

Next Steps
The subcommittee should discuss the attached Transportation Demand Management Strategy for the City of Brisbane and accompanying draft TDM ordinance and provide input and direction on moving it forward for City Council for consideration.

ATTACHMENTS

1. City of Brisbane Transportation Demand Management Strategy ___________________________
John Swiecki, Community Development Director
5 B.

Transportation
Demand Management
Strategy
Prepared for:

City of Brisbane
February 2023
ATTACHMENT 1
6 B.
2 Table of Contents

1. Introduction................................................................................................................................. 1

1.1 About this Report .................................................................................................................................................................1

1.2 Policy Context.........................................................................................................................................................................1 City of Brisbane General Plan..........................................................................................................................................1 Brisbane Municipal Code Chapter 10.52 ....................................................................................................................2 C/CAG Congestion Management Plan Compliance ..............................................................................................2

2. Proposed TDM Ordinance........................................................................................................... 3

2.1 Findings (10.52.010).............................................................................................................................................................3

2.2 Purpose (10.52.020) .............................................................................................................................................................4

2.3 Definitions (10.52.030)........................................................................................................................................................4

2.4 Applicability (10.52.040).....................................................................................................................................................4

2.5 Exemptions (10.52.050) ......................................................................................................................................................5

2.6 Project Tier Requirements (10.52.060)..........................................................................................................................6

2.7 Trip Reduction Measures (10.52.070) ...........................................................................................................................7

2.8 Submittal Requirements & Approvals Process (10.52.080)..................................................................................8

2.9 Monitoring & Enforcement (10.52.090).......................................................................................................................8 Appendix A: TDM Ordinance Implementation.............................................................................. 10

3.1 Consistency with C/CAG Guidelines ............................................................................................................................10

3.2 List of TDM Measures .......................................................................................................................................................13

3.3 TDM Checklists and Plans ...............................................................................................................................................16

3.4 Tenant Concurrence Letter .............................................................................................................................................16

3.5 Monitoring.............................................................................................................................................................................17

3.5.1 Annual Compliance Report.................................................................................................................................17

3.5.2 Survey & Count Methods ....................................................................................................................................17

3.5.3 Standardized Survey Language.........................................................................................................................17

3.5.4 Analysis of Results ..................................................................................................................................................20

3.5.5 Enforcement Fines ..................................................................................................................................................20

3.6 Zoning Code Updates .......................................................................................................................................................21

3.6.1 Auto Parking Requirements for Office/R&D Uses .....................................................................................21

3.6.2 Bicycle Parking Requirements for Residential and Other Uses.............................................................22 ATTACHMENT 1
7 B.
1 1. Introduction

1.1 About this Report
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) refers to policies, programs, and strategies that aim to reduce vehicle travel, particularly single-occupancy vehicles. TDM measures that reduce single occupancy vehicle travel and shift trips to transit, active transportation, and carpooling can provide a range of benefits, including but not limited to: alleviating traffic congestion, reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and greenhouse gas emissions, managing parking demand, promoting more physically active communities, and making efficient use of the existing transportation system.

This report provides a TDM Strategy for the City of Brisbane to prepare the City for land use changes and align with policies with county and state requirements. It documents a proposed TDM Ordinance for the City along with implementation measures related to planning and monitoring TDM measures as well as supportive actions for infrastructure, services, funding, and parking policies.

1.2 Policy Context
Numerous plans and policies already in place (at both the local, regional, and State level) support an ordinance promoting provision of TDM programs at new developments.

City of Brisbane General Plan
The City of Brisbane’s General Plan Policy C.38 strives to promote TDM as a means of reducing traffic congestion:

Policy C.38 Continue participation in the efforts of subregional and regional transportation agencies to manage transportation systems.

Program C.38.a Continue active participation in the Congestion Management Program.

Program C.38.b Continue active participation in the Peninsula Traffic Congestion Relief Alliance Joint Powers Authority (Commute.org), as a means to cooperatively encourage residents and employees to reduce demand on transportation infrastructure.

Program C.38.c Provide information to citizens, employers, and employees on the alternatives to the single-occupant commute vehicle and the benefits of using the alternatives.

Program C.38.d Provide local incentives for participation in Transportation System Management (TSM) and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs.

Program C.38.e Require TSM and TDM measures to help mitigate the traffic and parking impacts of development projects.

ATTACHMENT 1
8 B.
2 Brisbane Municipal Code Chapter 10.52
The City of Brisbane’s Municipal Code Chapter 10.52 currently establishes a Transportation System Management Program aimed at reducing automobile trips and vehicle miles traveled. The ordinance codifies the City’s participation in countywide efforts to reduce vehicle trips (via the Peninsula Traffic Congestion Relief Alliance, or Commute.org) and the Congestion Management Program. The program proposed below would replace and supersede this program in its entirety.

C/CAG Congestion Management Plan Compliance
TDM helps manage vehicle congestion in accordance with San Mateo County’s Congestion Management Plan (CMP). CMP compliance is monitored by the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG), which updated its TDM Policy guidance for the county in 2021.1 C/CAG’s guidance includes recommended thresholds for development projects to be subject to a TDM program and includes recommended performance targets for single-occupancy vehicle mode shares. The City of Brisbane retains the ability to develop its own TDM Ordinance consistent with the framework provided by C/CAG.

The City’s goal has been to streamline the TDM process and avoid multiple rounds of regulatory review.

Therefore, the City’s TDM Ordinance below has been drafted to comply with C/CAG’s guidance and TDM Policy Update (2021 San Mateo County CMP, Section 6). Consequently, projects which are consistent with the City’s program will also be considered consistent with C/CAG’s TDM Policy. 1 Transportation Demand Management Policy Update Approach, C/CAG, September 1, 2021 https://ccag.ca.gov/wpcontent/uploads/2021/09/6.3-A5-CCAG_TDM-Policy-Update-Approach-June-2021_Final-w-redlines.pdf ATTACHMENT 1
9 B.
3 2. Proposed TDM Ordinance
The following TDM ordinance is recommended for adoption by the City of Brisbane. This Ordinance would replace and supersede Brisbane Municipal Code Chapter 10.52 in its entirety, and projects which are consistent with the City's TDM Program, would also be considered consistent with both General Plan Policy C.38 and its implanting programs and the C/CAG TDM Policy.

2.1 Findings (10.52.010)
The council of the city finds and determines that:

A. Continued growth in both the City and the overall region have led to increased vehicle trips, longer commute times, and a continued need for transportation management.

B. Future development in the City and the region is likely to lead to additional vehicle trips, particularly during the AM and PM commute hours.

C. A reduction in daily vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for residential and nonresidential developments is proposed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality.

D. There is limited capacity to expand existing roadway infrastructure and roadway expansions have the potential to induce greenhouse gas emissions, depending on the type of expansion.

E. Decreasing the amount of VMT during both the peak periods and across the day will improve quality of life, help manage use of existing City infrastructure, and help make Brisbane an attractive and convenient place to live, work, visit and do business.

F. Transportation demand management programs can help to reduce VMT, and can be even more effective when coordinated at a regional level, and when utilizing acknowledged best practices to encourage mode shift away from single occupant vehicles G. Participation in the Peninsula Traffic Congestion Relief Alliance (Commute.org) has helped manage VMT growth in the City, however additional efforts to decrease VMT have been proposed to further reduce VMT and vehicle trips.

H. Developing additional measures for new developments to ensure they offer robust transportation demand management programs, comply with design best practices to reduce reliance on private automobiles, and work towards the City’s goals is the next logical step in working to alleviate both VMT and the environmental impacts of new developments.

I. The Sierra Point subarea, due to limited roadway access, experiences higher levels of congestion compared to Brisbane as a whole and may require more aggressive actions to manage VMT and vehicle trips.

J. The San Mateo County Congestion Management Program requires projects generating more than 100 daily vehicle trips to implement an appropriate TDM Program; this ordinance meets the relevant CMP requirements. Projects which are consistent with the City's TDM Program are considered consistent the C/CAG’s CMP TDM Policy.

ATTACHMENT 1
10 B.
4 2.2 Purpose (10.52.020)
The specific purposes of this chapter are:

A. Reduce the number of VMT generated by new and existing development.

B. Manage vehicular trips, especially trips associated with drive-alone commute trips during peak traffic periods (6am – 10am and 3pm – 7pm on weekdays).

C. Promote more efficient utilization of existing transportation facilities and ensure that new developments maximize usage of shuttle services, transit, active transportation, carpooling, and vanpooling.

D. Increase awareness of and promote greater public use of walking, bicycling, transit, carpooling, and vanpooling.

E. Develop a set of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs designed to ensure the most effective types of TDM measures are included in all new developments.

F. Achieve compliance with the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County’s (C/CAG) Congestion Management Program within the City of Brisbane thereby avoiding multiple rounds of regulatory review.

2.3 Definitions (10.52.030)
For the purposes of this chapter, the following definitions apply:

A. “Average daily trips” shall mean the average number of vehicle trips (inclusive of all auto, freight, and other motorized travel) to and from a project site on a typical weekday, not including holidays and excluding construction vehicle related trips.

B. “Peak period” shall mean the busiest or most popular travel time on weekdays (6am-10am and 3pm-7pm)
C. “Project” shall mean any construction, development, or infrastructure project, that requires the issuance of any discretionary planning permit pursuant to Brisbane Municipal Code Title 17 or a building permit under Brisbane Municipal Code Title 15.

1. “Trade Commercial Project” shall mean any nonresidential use, other than warehousing, office, and research and development, defined under Chapter 17.02 that is permitted or conditionally allowed in any Trade Commercial Zoning District.

2. “Mixed-Use Project” shall mean any project consisting of two or more of the following:
i. Residential dwelling units
ii. Trade commercial
iii. Warehousing, office, and research and development

2.4 Applicability (10.52.040)
The requirements of this chapter shall apply to the following:

ATTACHMENT 1
11 B.
5 A. All projects that generate one hundred (100) or more average daily trips, based on localized factors and reasonable trip generation estimates, which includes, but is not limited to data from the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates, or the trip generation data from Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) calculations. As part of this analysis the City may consider the ability of a project to displace existing vehicle trips, i.e. the net change in average daily trips. The Community Development Director, or their designated representative, may determine what constitutes a reasonable trip generation rate.

B. Any nonresidential project applying for a planning or building permit for improvements valued at more than $500,000 in construction costs, regardless of the number of average daily trips generated.

C. Any project involving additions, alterations, or major rebuilds to a lawfully constructed building completed within any five (5) year period subject to the requirements set forth in Chapter 15.10 of Title 15, regardless of the number of average daily trips generated.

2.5 Exemptions (10.52.050)
The following projects are exempt from this chapter:

A. Specific Plans. All projects in an area subject to a specific plan shall comply with TDM requirements imposed by that specific plan.

B. Previously entitled projects. Projects with an approved development agreement or, prior to XX, 2023, that have an approved vesting tentative map shall be measured according to the performance standards specified in their respective conditions of approval. Projects for which the City has issued a building permit prior to XX, 2023 shall also be measured according to the performance standards specified in their respective conditions of approval, provided, however, that if such project requires one or more additional building permits one or more of which meet the applicability standards within subsection 10.52.040, the performance standards in this Chapter shall apply.

C. Affordable Housing. Multifamily residential projects in which one hundred percent (100%) of the dwelling units are designated as Affordable, Inclusionary, or Target Units per BMC Chapter 17.31.

D. Small residential projects. Any residential project consisting of either of the following:

1. Fewer than twenty (20) multiple-family dwelling units as defined as defined in Section

17.02.235 of Title 17; or

2. Fewer than ten (10) single-family dwellings as defined in as defined in Section 17.02.235 of Title 17; or

3. Fewer than seven (7) duplexes (i.e., fewer than fourteen duplex dwelling units) as defined in Section 17.02.230 of Title 17.

E. Accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units. Accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units, as defined in Section 17.02.235 of Title 17.

F. Projects with environmental benefits. Any project, as determined by the Community Development Director, which results in an environmental benefit to the City and will not generate new ADT ATTACHMENT 1
12 B.
6 (including projects which generate localized trips but displace other existing trips) or are under one hundred (100) average daily trips.

2.6 Project Tier Requirements (10.52.060)
A. Tiers of Compliance. All projects subject to the requirements of this chapter shall incorporate trip reduction measures, prescribed under Section 2.7 (10.52.070), based on the following three tiers.

Mixed-use projects are subject to the highest applicable tier for any single project component:

1. Tier 1. The following projects shall implement all Tier 1 TDM measures, submit an initial self-certification report, and an annual self-certification report thereafter for the first six (6) years after occupancy:
a. All nonresidential projects that do not meet the criteria for Tier 2 or Tier 3; and b. Residential projects not exempted under Section 2.5 (10.52.050) of this Title.

2. Tier 2. The following projects shall implement all Tier 1 and 2 TDM measures, submit an initial self-certification report, an annual self-certification report thereafter and conduct annual mode share surveys for the first twenty (20) years after occupancy:
a. Office and Research and Development (R&D) projects between ten thousand (10,000) and fifty thousand (50,000) square feet of gross building square footage; and
b. All warehousing and trade commercial projects.

3. Tier 3. The following projects shall implement all Tier 1, 2, and 3 TDM measures, submit an initial self-certification report, and annually monitor progress towards a target mode share of fifty-two percent (52%) of employees commuting via driving-alone and annually submit a self-certification report thereafter detailing the findings of yearly surveys and driveway counts in perpetuity:
a. Office and R&D projects with greater than fifty thousand (50,000) square feet of gross building square footage.

B. Annual Compliance Reporting. All projects subject to the requirements of this chapter shall submit a self-certification report one year from issuance of the first certificate of occupancy and/or building permit final, whichever occurs first, and annually thereafter pursuant to subsection A of this section.

1. Exception. Tier 1 and Tier 2 local-serving, nonresidential uses, including retail and hotel, as determined by the Community Development Director, are not subject to annual monitoring by the City unless found to have a significant impact to VMT during environmental review.

ATTACHMENT 1
13 B.
7 2.7 Trip Reduction Measures (10.52.070)
A. All projects subject to the requirements of this chapter shall implement all the required measures per the applicable tier of compliance prescribed in this section and/or contained within the City of Brisbane’s Transportation Demand Management Strategy document or successor TDM document.

1. Tier 1 Measures:
a. Designate a dedicated TDM Coordinator to serve as point person of the project and engage in regular marketing activities, including sharing information on transportation alternatives;
b. Participate in Commute.org trip reduction programs;
c. Provide bicycle and pedestrian-oriented site access; d. Provide bicycle parking per city code;
e. Provide upgrades to pedestrian, bicycle, or transit infrastructure along the Project’s frontage as requested by the City; and
f. Complete an annual self-certification report for a designated time period as required by Section 2.6 (10.52.060) of this Title.

2. Tier 2 Measures – All Tier 1 measures plus all of the following:
g. Provide financial contributions toward Commute.org’s shuttle operations consortium, or successor organization designated by the City, at a level to be specified by Commute.org (or successor organization designated by the City) based on project’s size and proximity to shuttle service; and h. Provide pre-tax commuter benefits to employees.
i. Conduct annual employee mode share surveys for informational purposes.

3. Tier 3 – All Tier 1 and Tier 2 Measures plus all of the following:
j. Encourage telecommuting and flexible work schedules; k. Right-size parking supply within City required maximums per Chapter 17.34; l. If located within the SP-SCRO Zoning District, provide a fair share financial contribution toward a Commute.org shuttle service (or successor organization designated by the City) proposed to achieve a peak period frequency of 15 minutes or better to BART and Caltrain;
m. Provide a subsidized carpool and vanpool program;
n. Provide parking cash-out or implement paid parking on-site; o. Provide transit subsidy benefits up to the IRS maximum amount; p. Provide access to end-of-trip bicycle facilities including showers, lockers, and a bicycle repair station on-site, or within 100 yards of the site; and q. Conduct annual employee mode share surveys and driveway counts to monitor progress towards a fifty-two percent (52%) drive alone mode share goal.

B. Additional measures not listed in this section may be applied at the City’s discretion.

ATTACHMENT 1
14 B.
8 C. The City may reduce the requirements of this section or chapter if a project is shown to attain VMT values consistent with local, regional, or state goals without implementation of all measures required herein.

2.8 Submittal Requirements & Approvals Process (10.52.080) A. Submittal Requirement. The following TDM documentation shall be submitted with any discretionary planning permit application and/or building permit application:

1. TDM Checklist (all Tiers);

2. (Tier 3 projects only) TDM plan, including:
a. A letter documenting the project’s proposed trip reduction measures consistent with the requirements identified in Section 2.7 (10.52.070); b. An annotated site plan that designates trip reduction design elements; and c. Property owner certification that the required measures will be implemented and maintained per Section 2.6 (10.52.060) and monitored per Section 2.9 (10.52.090).

3. (If applicable) Tenant concurrence letter demonstrating acknowledgement and cooperation with the proposed trip reduction measures, including:
a. Tenant certification that applicable trip reduction measures are identified in their lease; and
b. A summary of how the tenant is implementing applicable TDM measures.

4. Additional documentation not listed above may be required at the discretion of the City.

B. Approvals Process. The Community Development Director shall review the documentation required pursuant to subsection A of this section and determine if the proposed TDM program includes all required TDM measures and is adequate to achieve the relevant performance target for the Project.

2.9 Monitoring & Enforcement (10.52.090)
All projects are subject to the following monitoring and enforcement process:

A. Initial Compliance Report. Prior to building permit issuance, all projects must submit an initial compliance letter to the Community Development Director documenting trip reduction measures and how their TDM program will be implemented.

B. Annual Compliance Report. All projects, unless excepted under subsection 10.52.060.B.1, are required to submit an annual compliance report documenting the continued implementation of TDM measures pursuant to the requirements contained within Section 2.6 (10.52.060) to the Community Development Director.

1. Tier 2 and Tier 3 Projects. Annual Compliance Reports shall include results from surveys and driveway counts pursuant to subsection Section 10.52.060.A.2.

ATTACHMENT 1
15 B.
9 2. Tier 3 Projects. Tier 3 projects that do not achieve the target drive alone mode share prescribed under subsection 10.52.060.A.3 shall include proposed changes to their TDM Program to further reduce VMT and vehicle trips with the Annual Compliance Report.

C. Penalty for Noncompliance. The violation of any provision of this chapter is unlawful, hereby declared to be a public nuisance, and shall be subject to the following:

1. All projects. Failure to submit the required annual compliance report prescribed under subsection B, or submission of an incomplete annual compliance report, shall be punishable as set forth in Chapters 1.14, 1.16, and 1.18 of this Code.

2. All projects. Failure to implement and maintain trip reduction measures prescribed under Section 2.7 (10.52.070) shall be punishable as set forth in Chapters 1.14, 1.16, and 1.18 of this Code.

3. Tier 3 Projects. Failure to implement and maintain trip reduction measures prescribed under Section 2.7 (10.52.070) and/or if the target mode share is not being achieved shall result in the following penalties
a. First Violation. The City will direct the participant to modify its TDM program to achieve compliance.
b. Second Violation. The City will direct the participant to coordinate with Commute.org, or successor agency, or retain an independent consultant to identify additional program modifications to achieve compliance. c. Third Violation. The City shall assess a fine per a City Council approved resolution.

Fines shall be assessed for each additional violation in subsequent years.

D. Appeals. Any person receiving a notice of violation or correction issued under this chapter may file a notice of appeal with the city clerk within ten (10) days after receipt of the notice to challenge the determination that a violation occurred, that corrective action is necessary, or in the case of a fine imposed on the owner of a Tier 3 project, the amount of the fine.

1. The city manager, or designee, shall conduct an administrative hearing within thirty (30) days after the filing of the appeal. With the consent of the appellant, the matter may be continued if additional time is needed for the city manager to evaluate the appeal.

2. The city manager, or designee, shall render a written decision within ten (10) days after the conclusion of the hearing and may affirm, reverse or modify the determination whether there has been a violation, whether corrective action is necessary, and/or the amount of the fine. The city manager, or designee, may consider whether the participant has made a good faith effort to achieve the required alternative mode use.

3. The decision of the city manager, or designee, shall be final.

ATTACHMENT 1
16 B.
10 Appendix A: TDM Ordinance
Implementation

3.1 Consistency with C/CAG Guidelines
The City’s TDM Ordinance builds upon C/CAG’s countywide approach while tailoring requirements to the City of Brisbane. C/CAG’s TDM Policy Implementation Guide states that member jurisdictions may request an exemption to C/CAG’s policy provided that it meets or exceeds a single-occupancy vehicle (SOV) trip reduction of 25 percent for transit-oriented development and small residential projects and 35 percent for all other land use types. By achieving a SOV mode share of 73 percent (small projects) or 67 percent (large projects), traffic may be sufficiently addressed and consistent with the Congestion Management Program (CMP).2 This section describes the consistency of the ordinance with C/CAG’s approach.

Table A summarizes the similarities and differences between C/CAG and proposed City requirements.

Office/R&D projects, which comprise the primary generator of peak period commute trips and vehicle miles traveled in the City, would achieve a higher non-auto mode share under the City’s TDM Ordinance than C/CAG’s recommendations (52 percent drive alone, compared to 67 percent to 73 percent under C/CAG)3.

Tier 3 Office/R&D projects would also be subject to more frequent surveys, vehicle counts, and enforcement. 2 The C/CAG CMP program and the Brisbane TDM Strategy use two different methods of accounting for percentage reductions. Under the C/CAG CMP, reductions are taken from a presumed 100% drive alone mode share and consistent with C/CAG’s checklist of trip reduction percentage, while reductions in Brisbane are based on actual rates of driving within the City. Comparisons between the two programs should focus on the target drive alone mode share rates.
3 As discussed in the Monitoring & Enforcement section, drive alone trips would also include trips by motorcycle, dropped off by a friend/family member, dropped off by Uber, Lyft, taxi, etc., or non-responses ATTACHMENT 1
17 B.
11 Table A: C/CAG vs. City of Brisbane Performance & Monitoring for Nonresidential Uses Sample Land
Use
(Tier)
C/CAG City of Brisbane
Drive
Alone
Mode
Share
Monitoring Enforcement Drive
Alone
Mode
Share
Monitoring Enforcement
Office/R&D and
any other
developments
with significant
impacts to VMT
(Tier 3)
67%-
73%
Biennial/
triennial
surveys for
first 18 years
Voluntary
Revisions to TDM
Program
52% Annual
surveys and
counts for
lifespan of
project
Fines for Failing to
Submit Required
Monitoring and Annual
Reports
Mandatory revisions to
TDM Program if goal
not achieved
Fines for failing to
achieve performance
target of 52% drivealone mode share for
three years
Other
employment
uses with lessthan-significant
impacts to VMT
(Tier 2)
67%-
73%
Biennial/
triennial
surveys for
first 18 years
Voluntary
Revisions to TDM
Program
52% Annual
surveys for
the first 20
years
Fines for Failing to
Submit Required
Monitoring and Annual
Reports
Other nonresidential uses
(e.g., retail and
hotel) with lessthan-significant
impacts to VMT
(Tier 1 & 2)
67% -
73%
Biennial/
triennial
surveys for
first 18 years
Voluntary
Revisions to TDM
Program
52% None
(Projects
may be
subject to
C/CAG
monitoring)
Voluntary Revisions to
TDM Programs
Tier 1 and 2 nonresidential uses, such as retail or hotel developments, would be subject to the same performance standards as C/CAG’s recommendations, but would not be subject to annual monitoring by the City unless found to have a significant impact to VMT during environmental review. The City arrived at this recommendation due to the role of such land uses in reducing vehicle miles traveled and supporting multimodal travel behavior in Brisbane:
• In its Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA, the State of California’s Office of Planning and Research states that “of land use projects, residential, office, and retail projects tend to have the greatest influence on VMT” and among retail uses, “local-serving retail development tends to shorten trips and reduce VMT.”4
• Data from the California Household Travel Survey suggests that for Brisbane residents, only about 39 percent of all trips by residents occur via driving alone, which suggests that most retail and 4 Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA, State of California Office of Planning & Research, 2018 https://opr.ca.gov/docs/20180416-743_Technical_Advisory_4.16.18.pdf ATTACHMENT 1
18 B.
12 service land uses within the City are already within the C/CAG’s mode share standard (33 percent of trips occur via carpooling, 25 percent via walking, two percent via transit, and two percent via biking and other modes).
• The major geographic barriers that separate the City from neighboring communities suggest that increasing the amount of local-serving retail, hotel, and other commercial and service uses would result in fewer and shorter vehicle trips and lower VMT than if included elsewhere.

For these reasons, the City’s ordinance would not subject Tier 1 and Tier 2 local-serving nonresidential uses to annual surveys, or potential enforcement, and instead focus limited staff resources on more stringent enforcement of Tier 2 and Tier 3 employment land uses.

Tier 1 residential uses would be held to similar performance standards and monitoring as C/CAG’s recommendations. Existing data from the California Household Travel Survey suggests that residential land uses have a lower drive alone mode share than C/CAG’s mode share target (Table B). The City would require an annual self-certification instead of biennial for the first six years after occupancy.

Table B: Residential Performance Targets (Tier 1)
Criteria C/CAG Brisbane
Recommendations Existing Proposed Targets
Vehicle Trip Reduction -25% (TOD)
-35% (Other)
N/A Same as C/CAG
Drive Alone Mode Share
(All Trips)
67%-73% 38% (All Trips)1 Same as C/CAG
Monitoring Approach Biennial self-certification
for first six years
N/A Annual self-certification
form for the first six
years
Sources: 1California Household Travel Survey, 2012
ATTACHMENT 1
19 B.
13 3.2 List of TDM Measures
The following measures shall be required for each project tier, unless subject to specific exemptions:

Table C: Required TDM Measures by Project Tier
TDM Measure Tiers
Required Description
A. Designated
TDM Coordinator 1, 2, 3
Provide a TDM coordinator or contact person and annually confirm the contact’s name, email, and phone number with the City. This individual may either be an employee of the property manager/employer, or may be a contracted through a third-party provider. The TDM coordinator shall provide oversight and management of the program’s implementation to the City of Brisbane. Tenants shall be obligated (via lease language) to provide a main point of contact for the Designated TDM Coordinator.

B. Participation in
Commute.org
and/or
Transportation
Management
Association
1, 2, 3
Sites shall partner with Commute.org (or a successor transportation management association with comparable TDM services), whose role is to coordinate transportation-related programs and services in specific geographic areas.

For non-residential projects, there are four components an applicant must fulfill to satisfactorily implement this measure:

1. Obtain and maintain certification of participation with Commute.org under their Certified Development Program, or equivalent successor program.

2. Provide commute assistance and ride-matching program

3. Provide Guaranteed Ride Home

4. Supply orientation, education, and promotional programs and/or materials for tenants
C. Bicycle and
PedestrianOriented Site
Access
1, 2, 3
Design project frontage, driveways, and any internal streets or pathways to provide travel choices and give people the option to avoid traffic congestion, increasing the overall capacity of the transportation network. Street designs shall enable safe access for all users of all ages and abilities. Improving pedestrian and cyclist safety and comfort can increase the use of active transportation for residents or employees of a project site. Examples of this access may include non-motorized pathways internal to the project, orienting the project’s main entrance toward an active transportation or transit facility, and minimizing site access barriers along paths of bicycle and pedestrian travel such as driveways, surface parking lots, loading docks, unmarked crosswalks, and meandering sidewalks.

D. Bicycle Parking 1, 2, 3 Provide safe and convenient bicycle parking as required by Section 17.34.070.

E. Bicycle,
Pedestrian, and
Transit
Infrastructure
Upgrades
1, 2, 3
Project shall provide offsite upgrades to pedestrian, bicycle, and/or transit infrastructure along its public frontage upon City request to achieve consistency with the City’s Circulation Element, other City plans, design guidelines, and/or best practices.

ATTACHMENT 1
20 B.
14 TDM Measure Tiers
Required Description
F. TDM Monitoring
Checklist 1, 2, 3
Project shall complete an annual TDM program self-certification form. Tier 1 residential projects shall complete the form annually for the first six years (Tier 1 and Tier 2 local serving, non-residential projects (hotel and retail) are exempt from annual reporting but must still file an initial self-certification). Tier 2 projects (employment uses, i.e., other than retail) shall complete the form annually for the first 20 years. Tier 3 projects shall complete the form annually for the project’s lifespan.

G. Shuttle
Participation 2, 3
Participate in funding consortium for Commute.org shuttle service based on fee structures reflecting project size and proximity to shuttle service, as developed by Commute.org.

H. Pre-Tax
Commuter
Benefits
2, 3
Offer pre-tax commuter benefits available to all employees, allowing withholding of pay on a pre-tax basis to fund transit costs. This may be in the form of cash value on a Clipper card, Caltrans passes, Samtrans passes, or any other eligible public transit network.

I. Encourage
Telecommuting &
Flexible Work
Schedules
3 Encourage employees to work remotely at least one day per week to reduce overall vehicle trips. When employees commute to work, encourage flexible work schedules that encourage travel outside of peak hours.

J. Right-Size
Parking Supply 3 Total project parking supply must not exceed City parking maximums (if applicable).

K. Shuttle
Commitment
(Sierra Point Only)
3 If located in Sierra Point Subarea, provide a fair share financial contribution toward a Commute.org shuttle proposed to achieve 15-minute frequencies for BART and Caltrain service during peak periods (approximately six hours per day from 7:00 AM to 10:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 7:00 PM). Contribution may be shared with other participants but must be sufficient to achieve service goal upon reaching 50 percent of building occupancy.

L. Carpool/
Vanpool Programs
and Parking
3 Carpooling and vanpooling are types of ridesharing that seek to allow vehicles to carry additional passengers when making a trip, with minimal additional mileage.

Carpooling generally uses participants' own automobiles. Vanpooling generally uses leased vans (often supplied by employers, non-profit organizations, car rental businesses, or government agencies). Carpool and vanpool programs shall include subsidies or other monetary incentives from employers (e.g., gas card after carpooling for a given amount of time, or parking subsidies for carpools), as well as ride-matching services to help facilitate these shared trips.

ATTACHMENT 1
21 B.
15 TDM Measure Tiers
Required Description
M. Paid Parking or
Parking Cash-out
3 Motorists pay directly for using parking facilities (paid parking), or employers offer cash equivalents to the cost of leasing a parking space to employees who do not receive a parking permit (parking cash-out).

For paid parking, parking rates shall be at the market rate (minimum $5 per day) and not subsidized by property owners or employers. Paid parking can result in more efficient use of parking facilities, address specific parking problems, ensure that parking is available for intended users, and reduce total parking requirements.

If an employer provides free parking as a benefit to employees, they can instead offer “cash-out” in the form of the equivalent value of the parking space directly to an employee. If the employer leases parking, the cash-out amount shall be equivalent to the cost per space for the employer to lease parking for employees. If the employer owns and manages its own parking facilities, the cash-out value shall be determined based on market rate parking at nearby locations.

N. Transit Pass
Subsidies 3
Offer public transit passes or subsidies equivalent to the IRS monthly commuter benefit maximum ($280/month in 2022) to incentivize transit use. This may be implemented through either a direct voucher program provided by the property manager, or through lease terms obligating employers at the site to provide said subsidies.

NOTE: Funding contributions towards and/or participation in Commute.org shuttle program does not count for this measure. Passes/subsidies provided must be valid for public transportation options, including but not limited to: BART, Caltrain, SamTrans, ferry, and vanpool subscription (or costs). Subsidies shall be administered through a pre-tax transit benefit program, allowing employees to fully fund their transit use with pre-tax dollars if they opt to. In the Bay Area, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) requires that employers with 50+ employees within the Air District provide commuter benefits and annual employer registration.

O. End-of-Trip
Bicycle Facilities 3
In addition to required bicycle parking pursuant to Section 17.34.070, office, industrial, warehouse, and research & development projects shall offer showers, changing rooms, and lockers. These amenities serve as end of trip facilities for employees arriving by bike or other active transportation forms. Providing employees with a place to shower, change and store clothes can encourage bicycle commuting. Such facilities may be incorporated into a gym or wellness center for broader employee use.

These projects shall also offer a bicycle repair station including a toolkit and air pump within a designated secure area of a building to encourage bicycling and support employees and residents. Tools and supplies can include those necessary for fixing a flat tire, adjusting a chain, and performing other basic bicycle maintenance.

Maintenance services can also be offered to each resident or employee at least once annually, covering basic services such as a tune-up and inspection at a local bicycle shop.

ATTACHMENT 1
22 B.
16 TDM Measure Tiers
Required Description
P. Enhanced
Monitoring: Survey
& Counts
3 Project shall conduct an annual survey of employees to determine rates of automobile use. The City shall identify standard survey requirements for participants in the program. The survey shall be administered by the participant’s designated TDM coordinator.

The Project will also engage a qualified consultant to conduct annual driveway counts at all project driveways and report total daily vehicle trips, AM peak hour vehicle trips, and PM peak hour vehicle trips.

3.3 TDM Checklists and Plans
The primary mechanism by which the City reviews compliance with the TDM Ordinance is through submittal of a completed TDM Checklist as part of a letter of compliance included in the application package. The checklists are intended to indicate the types of TDM measures that will be put in place at a given project, while the letter should include a commitment to provide required measures, specify selection of optional measures, and detail how the measures will be implemented or how measures may differ from the standard definition.

For Tier 1 and Tier 2 projects, submittal of a completed checklist and letter of compliance will be considered sufficient in most cases. Tier 3 projects should prepare and submit a brief TDM plan. Recommended contents of a TDM Plan for Tier 3 projects include:
• Summary of existing transit, bicycle, and pedestrian conditions near the project site • Identification of the nearest shuttle stop or other transit facilities, and documentation of the proposed shuttle operator (if applicable)
• Identification of proposed offsite improvements and description of how these improvements would support mode shift (if applicable)
• Identification of the proposed TDM coordinator, or description of how the TDM coordinator role will be fulfilled
• Acknowledgement of City’s required monitoring practices

3.4 Tenant Concurrence Letter
Although a development’s TDM Plan would typically be prepared by a property owner or manager, successful implementation relies on tenants. A tenant would be required to prepare a concurrence letter prior to the approval of a permit for tenant improvements summarizing how it will implement applicable TDM measures in coordination with the property owner/manager. The concurrence letter should include a contact person for the employer, who shall assume responsibility for implementing the relevant programs (if different from the TDM coordinator). The City shall receive and review this letter to confirm the implementation of the proposed TDM program.

ATTACHMENT 1
23 B.
17 3.5 Monitoring

3.5.1 Annual Compliance Report
All projects will be monitored through submittal of an annual compliance report that documents the implementation of required TDM measures. Tier 1 projects must submit this report annually for the first six years after occupancy; Tier 2 projects must submit this report annually for the first 20 years after occupancy; and Tier 3 projects must submit this report annually for the lifespan of the project. Tier 1 and Tier 2 localserving, nonresidential projects, while required to submit an initial compliance report, are exempt from submitting annual compliance reports

3.5.2 Survey & Count Methods
In addition to filing a compliance report, Tier 3 projects must also monitor progress towards the City’s mode share goals, and share results from driveway counts and an annual mode share survey.

Participants have two options in administering a mode share survey:

1. Administer a statistically valid survey to achieve a 90 percent confidence level with a three percent margin of error for the survey population. Documentation of the survey methods and calculations would be provided by an independent consultant.

2. Administer a general survey with a minimum response rate of 75 percent of the employee population.

Sample surveys are available from the City, and an example is included in section 4.5.3 below.

In addition to surveys, Tier 3 projects must also conduct driveway counts of vehicle trips once per year.

Counts may be conducted using either tube or video counts, and should cover the AM and PM peak periods for one week. The weekday average will then be presented to the City as part of the site’s annual compliance.

In all instances, participants in the program must provide raw data to the City as part of their compliance package, including:

1. Respondent-level survey response data (anonymized)

2. Trip count data as delivered by the contractor providing the counts for each location, with data separated into 15-minute increments or smaller.

3. Current employee population and building gross square footage Survey results should be provided to the City in a standardized format as specified by staff. Formatted reports are optional but not required.

3.5.3 Standardized Survey Language
The following standardized survey language is recommended for conducting all mode share surveys. The City may consider additional modifications to align its surveys with C/CAG & Commute.org’s countywide approach. Previously approved projects would also use this standardized survey language.

ATTACHMENT 1
24 B.
18 1. Which of the following best represents your employment at [location]? (check one) o Full-time Employee
o Part-time Employee
o Contract Employee

2. In what ZIP code is your home located? (enter 5-digit ZIP code; for example, 94901) ___[Fill in the blank]_______
o Prefer Not to Answer
o If prefer not to answer: Approximately how many miles is it from your home to your office in Brisbane?

3. In the past week, what time did you usually arrive to work (check one)? ____[Drop down in increments of 30 minutes, from 6 AM – 10AM, before 6AM, or after 10AM]_____

4. In the past week, what time did you usually leave work (check one)? ____[Drop down in increments of 30 minutes, from 3 PM – 7PM, before 3PM, or after 7PM]_______

5. In the past week, on which days did you use each of the following transportation modes to travel to work? If you used more than one mode, (e.g. you take Caltrain and then bicycle), identify the mode that was the longest part of your trip.

Transportation Mode Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Drove a car or
motorcycle alone
Rode as a carpool
passenger
Drove a carpool with
one or more other
adults
Vanpooled or Carpooled
with 6 or more people
ATTACHMENT 1
25 B.
19 6. [Only ask if respondent answered transit] Which of the following services did you use last week? (Check all that apply)
□ Caltrain
□ BART
□ SamTrans
□ Ferry
□ Shuttle (such as to/from BART, Caltrain, or ferry)
□ Express bus (point-to-point service from near my home)

7. [Only ask if respondent answered carpool or vanpool] If you travel by carpool or vanpool, how many total people traveled with you to work (not including yourself)? ___[Fill in the blank with number]_______

8. [Only ask if respondent answered drive alone] What is the primary reason you choose to drive alone?
___[Fill in the blank]_______
Note: In addition to required survey questions, individual site surveys may add their own questions tailored to their respective TDM programs regarding awareness of services and reason for mode choice, but these questions are not required.

Rode a bus, train, ferry,
or other public transit
Rode a Bicycle or
Scooter
Walked all the way
Dropped off by a
friend/family member
Dropped off by Uber,
Lyft, taxi, etc.

Worked from home /
telecommuted / worked
offsite
Did not work this day
Other (please specify)
ATTACHMENT 1
26 B.
20 3.5.4 Analysis of Results
To calculate drive alone mode share, City staff would sum the total number of trips completed via the following modes:
• Drove a car alone
• Dropped off by a friend/family member (excluding carpools) • Dropped off by Uber, Lyft, taxi, etc.
• Non-responses required to achieve required response rate If the sum of these commute modes exceeds the mode share target (52 percent), the project would not be out of compliance with its target.

For Tier 3 projects, driveway counts will be used as a secondary source of monitoring information. Count volumes would be compared to the peak-period, peak-direction traffic volumes presented in the Project’s relevant transportation analysis or EIR.

3.5.5 Enforcement Fines
The City should administer fines for non-compliance via code enforcement. Fines should be used to fund the operation of transportation services in Brisbane that improve mobility for residents in need, reduce vehicle trips, and reduce VMT. Previously approved projects would be held to the same standard for noncompliance.

All projects should be subject to the City’s existing fines, penalties, and enforcement provisions set forth in Chapters 1.14, 1.16, and 1.18 of the BMC for failure to either submit an annual compliance report or submission of an incomplete report or to implement and maintain trip reduction measures required under the Ordinance. For offenses committed by larger, Tier 3 projects, each participant should be allotted two violations, with opportunity to correct, before triggering their first fine. Fines should then be administered for each subsequent year of non-compliance after the third violation.

While the fine amount for these larger, Tier 3 projects is yet to be determined and may change year to year, for illustrative purposes, four fine levels were evaluated, to be assessed at a rate dependent on the size of the employer: $50 per employee, $100 per employee, $150 per employee, and $200 per employee. The basis for these fine levels is Mountain View’s North Bayshore employee tax, which taxes all employers of a certain size between $75 to $150 per employee to fund transportation services. For a 400,000 square foot life science campus with 1,000 employees, a $50 per employee rate would equate to a fine of $50,000 per year, while a $200 rate would equate to a fine of $200,000 per year.

ATTACHMENT 1
27 B.
21 3.6 Zoning Code Updates

3.6.1 Auto Parking Requirements for Office/R&D Uses
Aligning parking requirements with TDM performance targets would assist the City in realizing VMT reductions and mode shifts. As illustrated in Table D, City’s current minimum requirement for (administrative) office use (one space per 300 square feet) provides enough parking for nearly every employee to drive. Moreover, for life science uses that typically have one employee for every 350 to 450 square feet, parking supply exceeds employee population.

Table 2 highlights the recommended parking maximums to align with TDM ordinance requirements. Parking maximums may be set slightly above the required drive alone mode share target to provide some flexibility in accommodating carpools, vanpools, visitors, and parking turnover. The City may also consider allowing additional designated visitor or carpool/vanpool parking.

Table D: Implied Auto Mode Share & Recommended Parking Maximums Parking Spaces per 1,000
Square Feet
Office Life Science Office/Lab Mix Lab
1 Employee per
250 SF
1 Employee per
350 SF
1 Employee per
450 SF
1 Employee per
550 SF
1 25% 35% 45% 55%

1.25 31% 44% 56% 69%

1.5 38% 53% 68% 83%

1.75 44% 61% 79% 96%
2 50% 70% 90% 100%

2.25 56% 79% 100% 100%

2.5 63% 88% 100% 100%

2.75 69% 96% 100% 100%

3.33 (Current Standard) 83% 100% 100% 100%
Notes: Highlighting indicates the estimated parking supply necessary to accommodate a 55 to 60 percent of employees driving to work based on employee densities associated with typical land uses. For example, a typical office project should target a maximum of two spaces per 1,000 square feet, while a life science project should target 1.25 to 1.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The City should exercise caution in referencing these calculations for office and tech office uses, as such employees are more likely to work remotely.

The City may consider allowing a higher rate of parking as a conditional use permit if a project expects to serve a higher employee density than a typical use. However, a project’s parking supply should align with the designated land use: for example, a project proposed for office use should reflect the designated office maximum; if the applicant wishes to retain flexibility for either office or life science use, then two site plan alternatives should be prepared in alignment with the office and life science parking maximums.

ATTACHMENT 1
28 B.
22 Given the uncertainty of remote work trends emerging from the COVID-19 pandemic, the City should periodically monitor how onsite employee populations may change over time and reassess whether these maximums remain appropriate for such land uses.

3.6.2 Bicycle Parking Requirements for Residential and Other Uses Currently, Brisbane does not require residential projects to provide bicycle parking. As more multi-family housing is constructed, the City may wish to update its bicycle parking requirements to include minimum long-term bicycle parking facilities (secure shared facilities or lockers) for multifamily developments where units do not have dedicated private garages. The bicycle parking requirements in the Baylands Specific Plan (Table E) provides a good example of what may be adopted for multi-family residential and other uses.

Providing bicycle parking in multifamily projects can help enhance the viability of bicycle use within the City.

Table E: Proposed Baylands Specific Plan Bicycle Parking Requirements Use
Bicycle Parking Requirements
Long Term Short Term
Retail 1 per 12,000 square feet 1 per 4,000 square feet Parks and Open Space N/A 6 per acre
Multifamily Residential 1 per 2 units 1 per 10 units
Office 1 per 4,000 square feet 1 per 40,000 square feet ATTACHMENT 1
29 B.

← All documents from this meeting