Agenda packet, first session — Brisbane City Council, December 4, 2025

- 1 -
CITYof BRISBANE
Thursday, December 4, 2025 at 6:30 PM ● Hybrid Meeting 50 Park Place, Brisbane, CA The public may observe/participate in City Council meetings using remote public comment options or attending in person. The City Council may take action on any item listed in the agenda.

TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL

IN PERSON
Location: Community Meeting Room 50 Park Place, Brisbane, CA 94005 To address the City Council on any item – whether on the posted agenda or not – please fill out a Request to Speak Form located in the Community Meeting Room Lobby and submit it to the City Clerk. Speakers are not required to submit their name or address.

REMOTE PARTICIPATION
Members of the public may participate in the City Council meeting by logging into the Zoom Webinar listed below. City Council meetings may also be viewed live and/or on-demand via the City’s YouTube Channel, youtube.com/brisbaneca, or on Comcast Ch. 27. Archived videos may be replayed on the City’s website, brisbaneca.org/meetings. Please be advised that if there are technological difficulties, the meeting will nevertheless continue if remote participation is available.

The agenda materials may be viewed online at brisbaneca.org at least 72 hours prior to a Regular Meeting, and at least 24 hours prior to a Special Meeting.

Remote Public Comments:

Remote meeting participants may address the City Council via Zoom Webinar. Aside from commenting personally while in the Zoom Webinar, you can also use the call in number. The public comments received will be noted for the record during Oral Communications 1 and 2 or during an agenda item. We encourage you to email comments on or not on agenda items in advance of the meeting to [email protected]. That email address, however, will not be monitored during the meeting and emails received during the meeting will not be responded to or brought to the attention of the City Council during the meeting.

Join Zoom Webinar: zoom.us (please use the latest version: zoom.us/download) brisbaneca.org/cc-zoom
Webinar ID: 991 9362 8666
Call In Number: 1 (669) 900-9128
Note: Callers dial *9 to “raise hand” and dial *6 to mute/unmute.

City Council Meeting Agenda
1 December 4, 2025 - 2 - 6:30 PM

SPECIAL ASSISTANCE
If you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (415) 508-2113. Notification in advance of the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

WRITINGS THAT ARE RECEIVED AFTER THE AGENDA HAS BEEN POSTED Any writings that are received after the agenda has been posted but before 4pm of the day of the meeting will be available for public inspection at the front lobby in City Hall and on the internet (brisbaneca.org/meetings). Any writings that are received after 4pm of the day of the meeting will be distributed to the Council and made available for public inspection at the front lobby and on the internet the day after the meeting (brisbaneca.org/meetings). 6:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER – PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL
A. Consider any request of a City Councilmember to attend the meeting remotely under the “Emergency Circumstances” of AB 2449

ADOPTION OF AGENDA
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NO. 1

CONSENT CALENDAR
B. Accept Investment Report as of October 2025
C. Approve the Brisbane Village Helping Hands 10th Anniversary Celebration as a Cosponsored Event
D. Approve the Mothers of Brisbane Yoga Workshop for Event Cosponsorship E. Adopt a Resolution Approving Contract Amendment No. 2 with Anchor QEA, LLC in the amount of $77,500 for 2026 Brisbane Marina Maintenance Dredging

OLD BUSINESS
F. Discuss and Provide Direction to Staff Regarding the Potential Installation of a Camera Near the Community Park

NEW BUSINESS
G. Discuss and Provide Direction to Staff Regarding the Potential Use of Nonconformity Code for Properties Adjacent to the Community Park
2 December 4, 2025 - 3 - 6:30 PM

STAFF REPORTS
H. City Manager’s Report- City Updates and Upcoming Activities

MAYOR/COUNCIL MATTERS
I. Countywide Assignments and Subcommittee Reports
i. Parkside 2 Ad Hoc Subcommittee Update
ii. Report Out on Subcommittee Meetings
iii. Upcoming Subcommittee Meetings
J. Written Communications
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NO. 2

ADJOURNMENT
3 File Attachments for Item:

B. Accept Investment Report as of October 2025
4 FACE CARRY MARKET COUPON

INVESTMENT DATE OF VALUE OF VALUE OF VALUE OF INTEREST MATURITY RATING/ NAME OF DEPOSITORY TYPE INVESTMENT INVESTMENT INVESTMENT INVESTMENT RATE % DATE COLLATERAL WELLS FARGO Checking A/C $ 3,958,203 $ 3,958,203 $ 3,958,203 0.000 110% collateral STATE FUND (LAIF) Deposit on call continuous $ 5,259,083 $ 5,259,083 $ 5,259,083 4.150 on call no rating Other Investments
FFCB 12/1/2023 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,620 5.060 12/01/2026 FHLB 3/25/2022 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 984,240 2.600 03/25/2027 FHLB 5/26/2022 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 996,100 3.750 05/26/2027 FHLB 11/19/2024 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 999,930 4.650 11/19/2027 FHLB 6/30/2025 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,100 4.375 06/23/2028 FHLM 11/19/2024 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,090 5.000 11/19/2029 FHLB 10/21/2025 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 996,470 4.125 10/21/2030 BNY Mellon Treasury Obligations continuous $ 9,808,524 $ 9,808,524 $ 9,808,524 3.980 on call 110% collateral Sub-total $ 16,808,524 $ 16,808,524 $ 16,786,074
U.S. Bank 2014 BGPGA Bond (330) Improvements Fed Treas Obl $ - 10031 Reserve Fund Fed Treas Obl $ 1 10032
Revenue Fund Fed Treas Obl $ - 10034
Expense Fund Fed Treas Obl $ - 10035
Principal Fed Treas Obl $ 1 10036
Interest Fund Fed Treas Obl $ 0 10037
U.S. Bank 2015 Utility Capital (545) Improvements Fed Treas Obl $ - 10031 Reserve Fed Treas Obl $ 447 10032
Expense Fund Fed Treas Obl $ - 10035
BNY Mellon 2023 BGVMIDFA Bond (328) Improvements Fed Treas Obl $ 66 10031 Reserve / Project Fed Treas Obl $ 1,429,715 10032
Expense Fund Fed Treas Obl $ - 10035
Principal Fed Treas Obl $ - 10036
Interest Fund Fed Treas Obl $ 120,675 10037
PARS OPEB Trust Trust Cash Investments $ 5,136,659 13050 PARS Retirement Trust Trust Cash Investments $ 1,866,918 13050 Sub-total Cash with Fiscal Agents $ 8,554,481
Total other investments $ 25,363,005 $ 25,363,005 $ 16,786,074 TOTAL INVESTMENTS & CASH BALANCES $ 34,580,291 $ 34,580,291 $ 26,003,360 Outstanding Loans to Department Heads / Former Employees Date of loan Amount Amount Remaining Interest Rate
Stuart Schillinger 4/1/2002 318,750 $ 318,750 Variable, LAIF + 1% FFCB - Federal Farm Credit Bank
FHLB - Federal Home Loan Bank
FHLM - Federal Home Loan Mortage Corporation
FNMA -Federal National Mortgage Association
Two year Treasury 3.60%
Weighted Interest 3.47%
Weighted maturity 0.85 Years

TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE
These are all the securities in which the city funds, including all trust funds and oversight agencies funds, are invested and that (excluding approved deferred compensation plans) all these investments are in securities as permitted by adopted city policy.

It is also certified that enough liquid resources (including maturities and anticipated revenues) are available to meet the next six months' cash flow.

Carolina Yuen

CITY TREASURER

CITY OF BRISBANE

CASH BALANCES & INVESTMENTS

SOURCE OF FUNDING
October 31, 2025
5 B.

FACE MARKET FACE FACE

INVESTMENT VALUE OF VALUE OF VALUE OF VALUE OF

NAME OF DEPOSITORY TYPE INVESTMENT INVESTMENT INVESTMENT INVESTMENT WELLS FARGO Checking A/C $ 3,958,203 $ 3,958,203 $ 3,390,713 $ 567,490 16.7% $ 7,168,722 $ (3,210,518) (44.8%) STATE FUND (LAIF) Deposit on call $ 5,259,083 $ 5,259,083 $ 3,210,851 $ 2,048,232 63.8% $ 610,592 $ 4,648,491 761.3% Other Investments
Sub-total BNY Mellon $ 16,808,524 $16,786,074 $ 21,693,797 $ (4,885,273) (22.5%) $ 18,829,707 $ (2,021,183) (10.7%) Sub-total Cash with Fiscal Agents $ 8,554,481 $ 8,401,022 $ 153,459 1.8% $ 7,756,174 $ 798,308 10.3% Total other investments $ 25,363,005 $ 30,094,820 $ (4,731,814) $ 26,585,881 $ (1,222,876) TOTAL INVESTMENTS & CASH BALANCES $ 34,580,291 $26,003,360 $ 36,696,383 $ (2,116,092) (5.8%) $ 34,365,194 $ 215,097 0.6% -
Change in Face Value Change in Face Value

CITY OF BRISBANE

CASH BALANCES & INVESTMENTS
Comparative Review
October 31, 2025
Previous Month Previous Year

2.50%

3.00%

3.50%

4.00%

4.50%

5.00%
Interest Rates
2-year Treasury
LAIF
BNY Mellon Money
Market
City's Portfolio
Weighted Interest
October 2025 Review
The City's overall investments and cash balances decreased by $2.1M from the previous month, primarily due to vendor (Smart Corridor project and SFPUC) and debt service payments from the WFB account exceeding collections for the month.

As reflected on Page 1, the BNY Mellon agency bonds subtotal ended at $7M. The continued declining interest rates resulted in the redemption of two $1M bonds earning at least 4.8% in addition to one $1M bond maturing as scheduled in October. One bond was replaced in October at a rate of 4.125%. $2M was transferred to LAIF for a better-performing rate than the BNY money market, and an additional $3M was transferred to WFB to cover vendor payments.

Redemptions and maturity of higher-earning bonds deposited into lower earning LAIF account, and additional transfer to non-interest earning WFB account resulted in a decrease in the City's portfolio weighted interest to

3.47%, slightly below the 2-year Treasury rate benchmark of 3.60%.

The City's Cash with Fiscal Agents September 2025 $8.4M balance is primarily comprised of $7M of the PARS trust accounts and $1.4M of the 2023 Bond proceeds held in trust, as reflected on Page 1. The increase of $153K was primarily due to the transfer of $121K to the 2023 Bond series 6 B.

File Attachments for Item:

C. Approve the Brisbane Village Helping Hands 10th Anniversary Celebration as a Cosponsored Event
7 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: December 4, 2025
From: Jeff Franco, Recreation Coordinator
Noreen Leek, Parks & Recreation Director
Subject: Approve the Brisbane Village Helping Hands 10th Anniversary Celebration for Event Cosponsorship
Recommendation
Staff recommend approval of the Brisbane Village Helping Hands 10th Anniversary Celebration as a cosponsored event.

Background
Brisbane Village Helping Hands (BVHH) is a Non-profit 501(c)(3) organization established in 2016. Their mission is to be a resource to help residents stay in their homes as they “age in place” in Brisbane and to help them maintain a connection to the broader community. BVHH provides volunteer services to their members, who are all Brisbane residents, including transportation, friendly visits, minor home repair, and help with technology.

Discussion
Brisbane Village Helping Hands 10th Anniversary Celebration event will be held at the Sunrise Room on Sunday, February 8, 2026, from 1:00pm-4:00pm. Any funds raised at the event will benefit their nonprofit work. The event will include refreshments, socializing, a welcome speech, and a brief musical performance. Admission is free to the general public. Meeting the City’s Group II requirements for facility use with the event open to the general public qualifies them for free use of the facility and waives the deposit requirement.

Fiscal Impact
Brisbane Village Helping Hands is requesting support from the City as summarized in the table below. They have requested use of the Sunrise for the aforementioned event. Although use of the facility and the deposit are waived as part of their Group II designation, they are also asking the City to waive costs associated with event insurance.

FINANCIAL IMPACT SUMMARY BASED ON APPLICATION
Hourly Rate of Building
Attendant for Sunrise Room
Approximately 3 hours $50/hour =
$150
(including set up/clean up)
Waived per City policy for
Non-profit use
1 8
C.

Sunrise Room Rental
Deposit
$250
(Typically refundable absent
damages)
Waived per City policy for
Non-profit use
Indoor Event Insurance
Approximately $100-$250/event.
(Renters are typically required to
procure insurance on their own
and provide a copy to the city.)
Requesting requirement be
waived
Promotional and Marketing
Support Waived
Attachments

1. Cosponsorship application
Jeff Franco
Jeff Franco, Recreation Coordinator
___________________________________ __________________________________ Noreen Leek, Parks & Recreation Director Jeremy Dennis, City Manager 2 9
C.
1ty of Brisb
co
This application must be submitted to the Parks & Recreation Department at least (90) working days prior to the requested event.

PHONE: 415-508-2140 I EMAIL: [email protected] I OFFICE: 50 Park Place, Brisbane, CA 94005 Name of Contact Person: -+-'-L..k..!...L::..:��+---'"""-':........:c....:..._-"--.L...:c-- Contact Person's Phone: -�tfl-ljµ�L-J.1{p£....7...:........0J_!::...-----"')..-q�f'--'f'------ contact Person's Emai
Name of Organization:IAii;' �=l...!!:::c.L��l.l-C,61J!l.!llic\--:r:-t-J!l.,,t!:l=:rganization's Websit�(�1 k>h(. �V) \,(�£,, °9 Organization's Address or P.O. Box: TVV v
Circle ONE of the following items below that best describes your organization. (';�Brisbane Non-Profit Organization V. Non-resident, Non°Profit Organization (Outside of Brisbane) c. School District, School, or School Affiliated Group (ex. PTO) d. Private Group, Club, or Organization
What year �id your organization begin serving the Brisbane community? ....,d-'-'-()"""l_.(p,__ ___ _ How has your organization contributed to the Brisbane community in the past 2 years? What is your organization's mission and/or purpose?

EVEN - E
-
l
360
Name of Event -'tiµ..-:'--�.!....ll,l'..L.JipLLJll,£.�f-.!(..,��..fQfi��'-U.� Event Day of Week:--=----=-=:..::..,+------------
Event Location: ,9\.1,t\f\A.t. 1'e>:o::Yb
Reservation Permit Number (if applicable): -----------
Event Start Time: :J. : 6--0 f• m
Event Close Time: lf :,01) f' • rYl
Describe what can be expected f
�
om this event? (ex. Performance, shopping, activities, etc.) Will
-t--==t)�
Are there
there
t
any
��
be
��t
any
admission
fund raising
fees
at
for
this
this
event?
event?
��
�
0 ll!ffIf yes,
If yes,
what
��!!±l��
please
will
list
the
them
funds
here:
raised be used for. -------------
rw�
If this event is NOT open to the general public, what are the restrictions for who may attend? ( A · . . .
ex. ge, membership, residency, etc.)

Page 1 ends

Attachment 1
3 10
C.

INDOOR FACILITY ACCESS REQUEST ]
City Staff must be present to accommodate the use of any of our indoor facilities. The following _sched_Llle will be used to ensure someone will be available when you need access. (If you are not requesting indoor facility use, you may skip to the next section) Date of Facility Access (mm/dd/yy): PJ./o f' f?.. fp Opening Time: {="1) f h1 Closing Time: '{: ! f/t) (° nt Date of Facility Access (mm/dd/yy):____________ Opening Time:______ Closing Time: _____ _ Date of Facility Access (mm/dd/yy): __________ _ Opening Time: _____ _ Closing Time: _____ _ !EQUIPMENT USE REQUEST
<Insert Equipment Use Liability Notice>
Indicate the equipment you wish to borrow for this event.

Bluetooth Speaker? ___ with Microphone? __ _
Projector & Screen? {Mission Blue Only) __ _
Other: _________________________ _

PERMITS
Food & Beverage Permits
Quantity: Item:
~ 6ft Long Rectangle Tables
-----~meter Round Tables
~~~ h" ~d".J < ~ 0 ..... C airs FiV"rilc.--t'-Ov,n ..
10ft x _lOft Canopy/Pop-up Tent
Weighted Sandbags
Will any food or non-alcoholic beverages be sold at your event?¥-- If yes, this permit is required smchealth.org/food-program Will alcoholic beverages be served or sold at your event? rJJ If yes, you must attach a copy of an Alcoholic Beverage Permit *Full Liquor Liability: If beer or wine is available for consumption and money is transacted in any form (i.e. for donation, for a ticket, for a meal, for entry to the event, for the beverage) then full liquor liability premiums are necessary.

Traffic Permits
Will this event require any street or parking closures? p1.L If yes, you must obtain a Brisbane Encroachment Permit Amplified Sound Permits
Do you wish to use amplified sound at this event? t:!..! If yes, you must submit an Brisbane Amplified Sound Permit Application

ADDITIONAL SUPPORT
Do you n ed any promotional support for this event?
ignboards' Social Media?
Digital Graphics/ Flyers? Programs? •
Other: ~•f>1,ki>.-vi ,n~9t9~) ~t)">'l,% 1tlhfUSE AGREEMENT & tl'\.BILITV RELEASE To the fullest extent allowed by law, I agree to indemnify and defend the City of Brisbane, its directors, officers, agents, employees and volunteers and hold them harmless from and against any and all loss, liability, expense, claims, costs, suits, and damages, including attorneys' fees, arising out of the use or occupancy described in this application. I agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, age and empl yees for losses paid under the terms of any policy which arise from the use or occupancy described in this application.

Applicant Signature __ '--'';.,,_+./:.-...--11---_;;;;_----~---- l

Page 2 ends

4 11
C.

File Attachments for Item:

D. Approve the Mothers of Brisbane Yoga Workshop for Event Cosponsorship 12 Mothers of Brisbane’s Yoga Workshop cosponsorship

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: December 4, 2025
From: Jeff Franco, Recreation Coordinator
Noreen Leek, Parks and Recreation Director
Subject: Approve the Mothers of Brisbane’s Yoga Workshop for Event Cosponsorship
Recommendation
Staff recommend approval of the Mothers of Brisbane’s (MOB) Yoga Workshop as cosponsored event.

Background
The Mothers of Brisbane is a, 501 (c)(3), non-profit parents’ club and welcoming community of support for parents of young children in Brisbane and surrounding communities. Established in the summer of 2005, the MOB is a place where families come together to make friends, learn about community resources, hold family events, arrange playgroups and childcare, share information, and support, and generally have a good time together. The MOB currently consists of single, partnered, married, gay, straight, working, stay-at-home, and self-employed parents.

They come from different backgrounds, cultures, and experiences, but through it all, they are families.

Discussion
The Mothers of Brisbane Yoga Workshop will take place at the Mission Blue Center on Friday, February 20th, 2026, from 4:00PM-8:45PM. The event will be an informative yoga session with a social gathering at the end. The Mothers of Brisbane meets the City’s Group II requirements for facility use with the event open to the general public which qualifies them for free use of the facility and waives the deposit requirement.

Fiscal Impact
The Mothers of Brisbane is requesting support from the City as summarized in the table below.

They have requested use of the Mission Blue Center for the aforementioned event. Although use of the facility and the deposit are waived as part of their Group II designation, they are also asking the City to waive costs associated with event insurance.

FINANCIAL IMPACT SUMMARY BASED ON APPLICATION
Hourly Rental of Mission
Blue Center
Approximately 5 hours @
$371/hour = $1,855
Waived per City policy for
Non-profit use
1 13
D.

Mothers of Brisbane’s Yoga Workshop cosponsorship
(including set up/clean up)
Mission Blue Rental Deposit
$500
(Typically refundable absent
damages)
Waived per City policy for
Non-profit use
Indoor Event Insurance
Approximately $100-$250/event.
(Renters are typically required to
procure insurance on their own and
provide a copy to the city.)
Requesting requirement be
waived
Promotional and Marketing
Support
Waived
Attachments

1. Cosponsorship application
_Jeff Franco_________
Jeff Franco, Recreation Coordinator
___________________________________ ___________________________________ Noreen Leek, Parks & Recreation Director Jeremy Dennis, City Manager 2 14
D.

Name of Contact Person: ___________________________________ Contact Person’s Email: _____________________________________________________________________ Name of Organization: _____________________________________ Organization’s Address or P.O. Box: ________________________________________________________________________ Circle ONE of the following items below that best describes your organization. a. Brisbane Non-Profit Organization
b. Non-resident, Non-Profit Organization (Outside of Brisbane) c. School District, School, or School Affiliated Group (ex. PTO) d. Private Group, Club, or Organization
What year did your organization begin serving the Brisbane community? _________________ How has your organization contributed to the Brisbane community in the past 2 years? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ What is your organization’s mission and/or purpose?
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ This application must be submitted to the Parks & Recreation Department at least (90) working days prior to the requested event.

Phone: 415-508-2140 | Email: [email protected] | Office: 50 Park Place, Brisbane, CA 94005 City of Brisbane

CO-SPONSORSHIP APPLICATION

APPLICANT INFORMATION
Contact Person’s Phone: ___________________________________ Organization’s Website: ___________________________________

EVENT DETAILS
Name of Event: _______________________________________________ Event Date (mm/dd/yy): ________________________________________ Event Day of Week: ____________________________________________ Event Location: _______________________________________________ Reservation Permit Number (if applicable): _________________________ Describe what can be expected from this event? (ex. Performance, shopping, activities, etc.) ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Will there be any fundraising at this event? ______ If yes, what will the funds raised be used for? ______________________________ Are there any admission fees for this event? ______ If yes, please list them here: ____________________________________________ If this event is NOT open to the general public, what are the restrictions for who may attend? (ex. Age, membership, residency, etc.) ________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 1 ends

Event Set-up Start Time: _______________
Event Start Time: ________________
Event Close Time: ________________
Ranjani Gupta 832-567-0501
[email protected]
Mothers of Brisbane
234 Santa Clara Ave Brisbane CA, 94005
The MOB” has hosted numerous community events over the years, often either for free or at a low cost.

We have brought Playgym/music classes, organized MoB Shop and several other seasonal events targeted to families in Brisbane and surrounding areas.

The MOB is a, 501 (c)(3), non-profit parents’ club and welcoming community of support for parents of young children in Brisbane, Ca and surrounding communities. We are single, partnered, married, gay, straight, working, stay-at-home, and self-employed. We come from different cultures, and experiences – but through it all, we are families.

Feb 20, 2026
Friday
Mission Blue
8:45 PM
4 PM
No
Yes
This is open to the public but we may ask that children not attend all of it or a portion of it (especially yoga) Yoga Workshop
Informative Yoga session with a social gathering towards the end Admission fee for event
3:45PM
3 Attachment 1
15 D.

City Staff must be present to accommodate the use of any of our indoor facilities. The following schedule will be used to ensure someone will be available when you need access. (If you are not requesting indoor facility use, you may skip to the next section) Date of Facility Access (mm/dd/yy):___________________________ Opening Time: ______________ Closing Time: ______________ Date of Facility Access (mm/dd/yy):___________________________ Opening Time: ______________ Closing Time: ______________ Date of Facility Access (mm/dd/yy):___________________________ Opening Time: ______________ Closing Time: ______________

INDOOR FACILITY ACCESS REQUEST

PERMITS
Food & Beverage Permits
Will any food or non-alcoholic beverages be sold at your event? ______ If yes, this permit is required smchealth.org/food-program Will alcoholic beverages be served or sold at your event? _____ If yes, you must attach a copy of an Alcoholic Beverage Permit *Full Liquor Liability: If beer or wine is available for consumption and money is transacted in any form (i.e. for donation, for a ticket, for a meal, for entry to the event, for the beverage) then full liquor liability premiums are necessary.

Traffic Permits
Will this event require any street or parking closures? _____ If yes, you must obtain a Brisbane Encroachment Permit Amplified Sound Permits
Do you wish to use amplified sound at this event? ____ If yes, you must submit an Brisbane Amplified Sound Permit Application

EQUIPMENT USE REQUEST
<Insert Equipment Use Liability Notice>
Indicate the equipment you wish to borrow for this event.

Bluetooth Speaker? ______ with Microphone? ______
Projector & Screen? (Mission Blue Only) ______
Other: ____________________________________________________________

ADDITIONAL SUPPORT
Quantity: Item:
____________ 6ft Long Rectangle Tables
____________ 5ft Diameter Round Tables
____________ Chairs
____________ 10ft x 10ft Canopy/Pop-up Tent
____________ Weighted Sandbags
Do you need any promotional support for this event?
Signboards?
Digital Graphics / Flyers?
Other: ____________________________

USE AGREEMENT & LIABILITY RELEASE
To the fullest extent allowed by law, I agree to indemnify and defend the City of Brisbane, its directors, officers, agents, employees and volunteers and hold them harmless from and against any and all loss, liability, expense, claims, costs, suits, and damages, including attorneys’ fees, arising out of the use or occupancy described in this application. I agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, agents and employees for losses paid under the terms of any policy which arise from the use or occupancy described in this application.

Page 2 ends

Social Media?
Programs?
Applicant Signature______________________________________ Date________________ 2/20/2026 3:45/4PM 8:45 PM
X
2 35 to go with the 5 tables
5 on the tile flooring
No
No
No
No
Yes Yes
11/3/2025
4 16
D.

File Attachments for Item:

E. Adopt a Resolution Approving Contract Amendment No. 2 with Anchor QEA, LLC in the amount of $77,500 for 2026 Brisbane Marina Maintenance Dredging 17 Anchor QEA Amendment No. 2

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: December 4, 2025
From: Jeremy Dennis, City Manager & Maz Bozorginia, Director of Public Works Subject: Contract Amendment No. 2 with Anchor QEA, LLC for 2026 Brisbane Marina Maintenance Dredging
Recommendation
Adopt the attached resolution approving Contract Amendment No. 2 with Anchor QEA, LLC in the amount of $77,500 for permitting support and preparation of 90% and 100% dredge design documents for the Brisbane Marina 2026 Maintenance Dredging Project and authorizing the City Manager to execute the amendment.

Background
In August 2025, the City executed a professional services agreement with Anchor QEA for technical support associated with the upcoming 2026 maintenance dredging of the Brisbane Marina. The last dredging occurred in 2015, and the 2026 episode offers an opportunity to reestablish baseline conditions and better understand how sedimentation patterns may evolve with sea level rise. These insights will support future monitoring and long-range planning to ensure the Marina remains functional and resilient in a changing coastal environment. The agreement amount is $200,000, issued under Purchase Order PO2600462, and is supported by Anchor QEA’s August 11, 2025, scope and cost proposal. The last dredging episode was in 2015.

The scope includes sediment characterization, sampling and analysis, and preparation of 60% (preliminary) dredge design documents.

During early implementation, the City authorized supplemental sediment testing to evaluate potential beneficial reuse of dredged material. This additional work, totaling $24,000, was approved within existing administrative authority in September 2025. The testing focused on modified elutriate testing (MET) chemistry and bioassay analysis and expanded the City’s disposal options for the upcoming dredging episode.

With sediment characterization and preliminary design nearing completion, the project now requires completion of permitting and final design documents—tasks necessary to maintain schedule for construction during the 2026 dredging window (June–November). Anchor QEA submitted a scope and cost proposal dated October 22, 2025, for these remaining tasks in the amount of $77,500.
1 18
E.

Anchor QEA Amendment No. 2
Because the cumulative contract value will exceed the City Manager’s approval authority, Council approval is required for Amendment No. 2
Discussion
The 2026 dredging episode requires coordination with the Dredged Material Management Office (DMMO), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Completing permits by early 2026 is essential to allow dredging during the established environmental work window.

Amendment No. 2 includes:
• Task 3 – Permitting: Preparation and submittal of the consolidated DMMO permit application and associated agency documentation, including coordination through permit review and issuance.
• Task 4 – 90% and 100% Design Documents: Preparation of final dredge design drawings, technical specifications, opinion of probable cost, and bid form. • Task 5 – Project Management: Coordination, meetings, schedule tracking, and general oversight.

Anchor QEA is serving as the City’s consultant for sediment characterization and 60% design for this episode and supported the City during the prior 2015 dredging cycle, leaving it well positioned to complete final design and permitting.

To support long-range planning, Anchor QEA provided a rough order-of-magnitude (ROM) construction cost estimate based on current market conditions, recent dredging bids, and the 2025 bathymetric survey. The estimate indicates:
• Base construction cost (Areas 1–11): approximately $6.1 to $6.3 million • High-range estimate: up to $8.9 million depending on market variability, optional areas, and contractor mobilization
(ROM estimates provided via Anchor QEA correspondence dated November 12–13, 2025) Approval of Amendment No. 2 does not commit the City to construction; it simply positions the project to be permit-ready and bid-ready.

Given the magnitude of the anticipated construction cost, staff will undertake a detailed funding analysis as part of future project development. This analysis will evaluate:
• Projected availability within the Marina Enterprise Fund • Suitability of the project for state or federal grant programs, including maritime, infrastructure, or climate-adaptation funding sources
• Opportunities to phase dredging areas to match available revenues 2 19
E.

Anchor QEA Amendment No. 2
• Timing and sequencing necessary to remain within the dredging window Staff will return to Council at a later date with a comprehensive financial plan prior to any request to bid or award construction.

Fiscal Impact
Approval of Amendment No. 2 will increase the total contract value with Anchor QEA as follows:
• $200,000 – Original Agreement
• $24,000 – Supplemental staff-authorized testing
• $77,500 – Proposed Amendment No. 2
Total Contract Value: $301,500
Funds for Amendment No. 2 are available in the Marina Enterprise Fund (GL 550-7009-000- 52030). There is no General Fund impact associated with this action.

Future construction costs—currently estimated between $6.1 million and $6.3 million, with potential higher-end scenarios approaching $8.9 million—will require separate Council consideration with an associated funding strategy.

Attachments

1. Anchor QEA Scope and Cost Proposal – August 11, 2025 (Original Agreement)

2. Anchor QEA Supplemental Testing Proposal – September 25, 2025

3. Anchor QEA Amendment No. 2 Proposal – October 22, 2025

4. Anchor QEA ROM Construction Cost Estimate – November 12–13, 2025

5. Draft Amendment No. 2

6. Draft Resolution
___________________________________ ___________________________________ Maz Bozorginia, Director of Public Works Jeremy Dennis, City Manager 3 20
E.

Attachment 1
4 21
E.

August 11, 2025
33 New Montgomery Street, Suite 1210
San Francisco, California 94105
415.230.0862
Mr. Randy Breault
Director of Public Works
City of Brisbane
50 Park Place
Brisbane, California 94005-1310
Re: Scope of Work and Cost Proposal
Brisbane Marina Maintenance Dredging Support, 2026 Episode - revised Dear Mr. Breault,
Anchor QEA is pleased to submit this revised scope of work and cost proposal to support the City of Brisbane’s (City’s) upcoming maintenance dredging needs at Brisbane Marina. We understand that the City seeks to once again dredge the Brisbane Marina and entrance channel to a depth of -8 feet mean lower low water, plus 2 feet of allowable overdepth consistent with the last dredging episode in 2015. The total volume of material estimated to be dredged is estimated at 225,000 cubic yards based on the March 2025 bathymetric survey. Given the anticipated dredging volume and the need to dredge within the established work window, we anticipate that dredging activities would be completed in the 2026 work window between June and November.

This first scope of work covers preliminary design (60%) and sediment sampling.

Proposed Scope of Work
Task 1: Sediment Characterization and Dredged Material Management Office Coordination
Based on the preliminary dredge volume estimate of 225,000 cubic yards, the marina and entrance channel will be divided into four dredge units for sampling and analysis activities. Consistent with the last dredging episode in 2015, proposed dredge material will be evaluated for in-Bay disposal at the Alcatraz Island (SF-11) disposal site. The following subtasks summarize the steps necessary to obtain a suitability determination from the DMMO.
5 22
E.

August 11, 2025

Page 2 ends

Task 1.1: Sampling and Analysis Plan
Anchor QEA will prepare a Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) for sample collection and analytical testing of sediments from Brisbane Marina and entrance channel. The SAP will be prepared in accordance with the following:
• Evaluation of Dredged Material Proposed for Discharge in Waters of the U.S. – Inland Testing Manual (ITM)
• PN 01-01: Guidelines for Implementing the Inland Testing Manual in the San Francisco Bay Region
The SAP will detail the sampling and analysis methods followed during field sample collection and laboratory analyses to determine sediment suitability for in-Bay disposal at SF-11. An electronic draft SAP will be submitted to the City for review. One round of review with minimal revisions is anticipated.

The final SAP will be distributed to DMMO agencies and the City. Prior to sampling, Anchor QEA will present the project and seek approval of the SAP by the DMMO at a DMMO meeting.

As part of Task 1.1, Anchor QEA will also develop a Health and Safety Plan that will provide background information, emergency phone numbers, the route to the nearest hospital, potential chemicals of concern, personal protective equipment requirements, key personnel responsibilities, and health and safety procedures.

Subtask 1.2: Sample Collection and Laboratory Analysis
Sediment cores will be collected at approximately 16 stations using a vibracore by Anchor QEA and our subcontractor Leviathan Environmental Services. It is anticipated that two cores will be required at each station to collect enough sediment for testing. Reference sediment would be collected from the SF-11 reference site by our subcontractor Brezina and Associates.

Individual core and Z-layer samples will be archived from each station. Depending on composite sample results, limited chemical analysis of individual core or Z-layer samples may be required by the DMMO. An individual core sample would only be analyzed if there is a need to refine the dredge unit based on elevated chemistry. A Z-layer sample would only be analyzed to characterize the newly exposed surface layer if the dredged material exhibited elevated chemical concentrations. Additional analysis of individual core and Z-layer samples is not included in this cost estimate.

In accordance with DMMO guidelines, four composite samples will be submitted for chemical analysis and biological testing to determine suitability for disposal at SF-11. Sediment chemistry will include total solids, total organic carbon, grain size, metals, organotins, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, organochlorine pesticides, and polychlorinated biphenyls. Based on recent sediment characterization studies, it is also anticipated that DMMO will request analysis of dioxin/furans because dioxin/furans have not been tested at this site before. This cost estimate also includes analysis of dioxin/furans. Biological testing for in-Bay disposal will include one water column and two 6 23
E.

August 11, 2025

Page 3 ends

benthic toxicity tests. During the benthic toxicity testing, reference sediment will be tested concurrently with composite samples for comparative purposes.

Biological testing and chemical analysis would be performed by our subcontracted laboratories, Pacific EcoRisk, Inc., and Physis Environmental Laboratories, Inc., respectively. Anchor QEA will perform data validation to ensure laboratory analyses meet the project data quality objectives.

Subtask 1.3: Sampling and Analysis Report
Anchor QEA will produce a Sampling and Analysis Report (SAR) detailing results of testing, final sampling locations, any deviations from the SAP, and conclusions regarding the suitability of dredged material placement at SF-11. The SAR will be prepared in accordance with the ITM and PN-01-01 and DMMO guidelines. An electronic draft SAR will be submitted to the City for review.

One review round with minimal revisions is anticipated. The final SAR will be distributed to DMMO agencies and the City. Final concurrence on dredged material suitability will be requested at a DMMO meeting.

Assumptions
Assumptions for Task 2 are as follows:
• No new survey is required (March 2025 survey is acceptable to DMMO). • Based on the estimated volume of 225,000 cubic yards, sediment cores will be collected at approximately 16 stations within four dredge units. Changes to this volume may impact the number of dredge units, sampling locations, and costs.
• Anchor QEA will spend 4 days in the field collecting and processing sediment cores, plus mobilization and demobilization. DMMO requests for additional sampling locations or dredge units may affect the duration of field activities and costs. • Four composite samples will be submitted for physical, chemical, and biological testing. • One reference sample will be submitted for benthic toxicity testing. • Bioaccumulation testing will not be required. If bioaccumulation triggers are exceeded, additional testing and tissue analysis will be required resulting in additional costs. • The complete analyte list will be subject to DMMO approval. • Analysis of individual cores and Z-layer samples will not be required. • Anchor QEA will attend one DMMO meeting to discuss the SAP and one DMMO meeting to discuss the SAR.

Task 2: Preliminary Dredge Design Documents
Anchor QEA will prepare draft 60% dredge design documents, including drawings, technical specifications, an opinion of probable costs, and a bid form for the dredging work. The 2015 dredge episode design will be used as a basis of the design. Design development will include evaluating dredging production rates, construction timelines, and potential dredging phasing options. The 7 24
E.

August 11, 2025

Page 4 ends

development of these documents will occur concurrently with the permitting and sediment investigation processes to the extent feasible.

The design drawings will depict site features necessary to inform a dredging contractor of existing site conditions, including site bathymetry; existing shorelines, docks, marine features, and structures; site mooring areas and access restrictions (if any); required dredge template (i.e., extents and limits of dredging); dredging side slopes; allowable overdepth limits; and typical cross sections. The CAD files that Anchor QEA developed for the previous dredging episode will be the initial starting point and reduce the time needed to create the dredge prism. If there has been a change to any infrastructure (new structures or demolitions), we will request the as-builts from the City.

The technical specifications will include detailed requirements for dredging and disposal of material at an in-Bay disposal location, in compliance with all permit conditions and environmental restrictions known at the time of preparation. Key input from the previous dredging episode specifications will be used to inform the technical specifications. If there are new engineering requirements by the City or updates to the City’s technical specifications packages, we ask that the City provide those as early in the design process as possible (within 2 weeks after the kick-off meeting). A bid form will be included in the technical specifications package, which will contain estimates of payable dredge quantities, potentially subdivided according to different dredging areas.

The design drawings and technical specifications will be prepared in a manner to be incorporated into a standard bid package provided by the City, which is anticipated to include the City’s Standard Agreement, Contract Terms (including bonding requirements, payment provisions, and insurance requirements), and General Conditions. We have assumed that contract documents, aside from our drawings and technical specifications, will be provided by the City, and the City will create the complete contract package, consistent with previous construction projects conducted by the City.

We will submit a draft (60%) set of design documents to the City for review and discussion, followed by a draft 90% set for City review, followed by a final (100%) set signed and stamped for bid solicitation (anticipated to be approved under a subsequent scope of work). We assume all deliverables will be submitted to the City in electronic format only.

Assumptions
Assumptions for Task 2 are as follows:
• Upland and shoreline topographic survey information, including location and geometry of adjacent structures, and the presence and location of utilities, is assumed to be the same as per the prior episode.
• The design depths will not exceed the original design depths alongside structures and guide piles at the site. We have therefore assumed it will not be necessary to analyze the stability of existing offshore and nearshore structures.
8 25
E.

August 11, 2025

Page 5 ends

• Sediment is anticipated to be disposed of at an in-Bay disposal location (SF-10 or SF-11) rather than at an upland landfill facility.
• The drawing package will be comprised of nine sheets, similar to the 2015 dredge drawings. • Anchor QEA will attend one site visit with the City, as well as up to two meetings (virtual or in person, as appropriate) with the City during the design process. • Any City-requested changes to the draft 90% design documents will be minor in nature, such as grammar correction or formatting. No material changes to the project will be incorporated beyond this phase.
• Bid solicitation and construction management is not included in this scope.

Schedule
We anticipate completing the sampling and 60% design documents within six months of notice to proceed. Permitting and final design (90%, 100%) should be initiated no later than upon approval of the Sampling and Analysis report to maintain schedule for construction in 2026. A separate scope of work and cost estimate for these tasks will be submitted.

Proposed Staff
With the exception of the laboratory analyses and sediment sample vessel collection, all work required to fulfill this scope of work will be completed by Anchor QEA staff, predominately located in our San Francisco, California, office. Dr. Joshua Burnam will be Anchor QEA’s Principal-in-Charge and overall project manager. He will be supported by Katie Chamberlin and Marine Vie, who will be our local point of contact and agency liaison for the regulatory permitting task, respectively; Chis Osuch, who will manage sediment characterization efforts; and Megan Collins, PE, and Amy Williams, PE, who will develop the engineering deliverables. Other Anchor QEA staff will provide oversight and guidance as required.

Estimated Costs
The total cost for completing Tasks 1 and 2 is $200,000, which is based on a time-and-materials, notto-exceed basis. Our current rates are included as Attachment 1.

Table 1
Proposed Costs
Task Description Anchor QEA Costs

1.1 Sampling and Analysis Plan $16,300

1.2 Sample Collection and Laboratory Analysis $139,400

1.3 Sampling and Analysis Report $16,800
2 Preliminary Dredge Design $27,500
Total $200,000
9 26
E.

August 11, 2025

Page 6 ends

We appreciate the opportunity to provide this cost proposal and look forward to beginning these project tasks. Please do not hesitate to contact me at [email protected], or at (415) 230-0862, if there are any questions or concerns with this proposal.

Sincerely,
Joshua Burnam, MPH, D.Env.

Principal Environmental Planner
Attachment
Attachment 1 Project Billing Rates
10 27
E.

Attachment 1
Project Billing Rates
11 28
E.

This is a company confidential document.

Anchor QEA
2025 BILLING RATES
Professional Level Hourly Rates
Principal CM1/Engineer/LA2/Planner/Scientist ...................................................................................................... $337 Senior Managing Analyst/CM/Engineer/LA/Planner/Scientist........................................................................ $306 Managing Analyst/CM/Engineer/LA/Planner/Scientist ...................................................................................... $284 Senior Analyst/CM/Engineer/LA/Planner/Project Manager/Scientist........................................................... $254 Staff 3 Analyst/CM/Engineer/LA/Planner/Scientist.............................................................................................. $221 Staff 2 Analyst/CM/Engineer/LA/Planner/Scientist.............................................................................................. $199 Staff 1 Analyst/CM/Engineer/LA/Planner/Scientist.............................................................................................. $168 Senior CAD3 Designer...................................................................................................................................................... $173 CAD Designer...................................................................................................................................................................... $146 Senior Field Technician ................................................................................................................................................... $154 Technician ............................................................................................................................................................................ $140 Senior Technical Editor.................................................................................................................................................... $172 Technical Editor.................................................................................................................................................................. $147 Senior Project Coordinator............................................................................................................................................ $164 Project Coordinator.......................................................................................................................................................... $135 Special Hourly Rates
National expert consultant............................................................................................................................................ $561 All work by a testifying expert.................................................................................1.5 times professional level rate Expert Advisor..................................................................................................................................................................... $431

EXPENSE BILLING RATES
Expense Rates
Technology Fee (of billed labor)......................................................................................................................................5% Mileage (per mile)......................................................................................................................Current federal standard

FEE ON LABOR AND EXPENSE CHARGES
Subcontracts/subconsultants .........................................................................................................................................10% Travel and other direct costs ..........................................................................................................................................10% Field equipment and supplies ........................................................................................................................................10% 1 CM: Construction Manager 2 LA: Landscape Architect 3 CAD: Computer-Aided Design 12 29
E.

PURCHASE ORDER
09/29/2025
ISSUED TO:

Date:

Vendor #: ANC01

ANCHOR QEA LLC
1201 3RD AVE STE 2600
SEATTLE, WA 98101-
SHIP TO: Corp Yard
1020 Tunnel Road
Brisbane, CA 94005
PO Number: PO2600468
Requisition #: R2600569
50 Park Place
Brisbane, CA 94005
PH: (415) 508-2100

CITY OF BRISBANE
ITEM UNITS DESCRIPTION GL ACCT # PROJ ACCT # PRICE AMOUNT 1 0
6-425f-96e1-b367010d8956
MARINA DREDGING 2026-ADDITIONAL TESTING
7215b89b-4f06-425f-96e1-b367010d8956
550-7009-000-52030 0.00 24,000.00
7215b89b-4f06-425f-96e1-b367010d8956 7215b89b-4f06-425f-96e1-b367010d8956 TOTAL 24,000.00
SUBTOTAL:

0.00 24,000.00
SHIPPING:

Authorized by: TOTAL TAX: 0.00
Attachment 2
13 30
E.
14 31
E.
15 32
E.

October 22, 2025
33 New Montgomery Street, Suite 1210
San Francisco, California 94105
415.230.0862
Mr. Maziar Bozorginia
Director of Public Works
City of Brisbane
50 Park Place
Brisbane, California 94005-1310
Re: Scope of Work and Cost Proposal - Continuing
Brisbane Marina Maintenance Dredging Support, 2026 Episode Dear Mr. Bozorginia,
Anchor QEA is pleased to submit this continuing scope of work and cost proposal to support the City of Brisbane’s (City’s) upcoming maintenance dredging needs at Brisbane Marina. As discussed previously and noted in prior scopes, this scope letter includes the remaining necessary tasks and budgets to be prepared for construction in 2026.

This first scope of work covers permitting and sediment sampling. Task numbering is sequential from our prior scope.

Proposed Scope of Work
Task 3: Permitting
Anchor QEA will prepare and submit the Dredged Material Management Office (DMMO) Consolidated Dredging Permit application to obtain permits covering the City’s proposed dredging work. The City’s prior permits have expired since the last episode, but we will make use of those materials to apply for renewed permits to the extent feasible.

The following permits will be obtained for the proposed dredging work:
• 10-year permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
• Endangered Species Act Section 7 concurrence letters from the National Marine Fisheries Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
• 10-year permit from the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission • Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board
• Notification only to the California State Lands Commission Attachment 3
16 33
E.

October 22, 2025

Page 2 ends

To obtain the required state and federal permits and approvals, Anchor QEA will prepare the following documents:
• Permit application forms
• A memorandum containing supplemental information that will be needed for permit issuance but cannot easily fit into the agency form templates
To streamline the project, the permitting process will be conducted parallel to the sediment characterization effort (in progress). Anchor QEA will prepare draft versions of these documents for review by the City. After addressing comments, we will prepare final versions of each document and submit them to the respective agencies for review and processing. After submitting applications, Anchor QEA will remain in close contact with the regulatory agencies issuing permits or approvals for the project. We will respond to agency comments, inquire regularly for status updates, and coordinate with agency points of contact as needed throughout the process of the issuance of permits. Anchor QEA will review all issued permits to determine if the permit conditions are feasible or if they prompt further discussions from the agencies.

Assumptions
Assumptions for Task 3 are as follows:
• All dredging is maintenance dredging, not new work.
• Dredging will occur within the established window of June 1 through November 30. • The project will qualify for the Small Dredger Programmatic Alternatives Analysis and will not require preparation of an Integrated Alternatives Analysis. • The DMMO application will be completed to state and federal standards. Anchor QEA will respond to agency comments on the DMMO application.
• Anchor QEA will coordinate and lead a virtual pre-application meeting. • Anchor QEA will develop draft and final versions of the application forms and supplement.

Anchor QEA will address one round of comments from the City on these documents. • Anchor QEA will attend up to two virtual meetings with the regulatory agencies, if required. • A California State Lands Commission dredging lease will not be required (confirmed during the previous 2015 dredging episode).
• No cultural resources memorandum will be provided for this effort; because the project is proposing maintenance dredging in an area that was previously dredged, there is no potential to encounter archeological and/or cultural resources.
• The Dredge Operations Plan for the 2026 dredging episode will be completed by the contractor, as specified in Task 3.
• The City will prepare a California Environmental Quality Act notice of exemption (similar to the previous 2015 dredging episode).
17 34
E.

October 22, 2025

Page 3 ends

• Preparation of a biological assessment, biological surveys, and fieldwork is excluded from this scope of work.
• An Incidental Take Permit (ITP) from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) will not be required because the project will not result in the “take” of state-listed special status species. By working within the established window, constraining the project to previously dredged areas, and minimizing the upland footprint of the project through using an established placement site, an ITP should be avoidable; however, if CDFW determines that the project requires an ITP, Anchor QEA would require additional funds to perform the additional work. • The City will provide proof of legal interest for the permit applications. • The City will be responsible for all permit fees.

Task 4: Dredge Design Documents – 90 and 100%
Anchor QEA will prepare draft 90%, and final 100% dredge design documents, including drawings, technical specifications, an opinion of probable costs, and a bid form for the dredging work. The 2015 dredge episode design will be used as a basis of the design. Design development will include evaluating dredging production rates, construction timelines, and potential dredging phasing options. The development of these documents will occur concurrently with the permitting and sediment investigation processes to the extent feasible.

October 22, 2025

Page 4 ends

drawings and technical specifications, will be provided by the City, and the City will create the complete contract package, consistent with previous construction projects conducted by the City.

We assume all deliverables will be submitted to the City in electronic format only.

Assumptions
Assumptions for Task 4 are as follows:
• Upland and shoreline topographic survey information, including location and geometry of adjacent structures, and the presence and location of utilities, is assumed to be the same as per the prior episode.
• The design depths will not exceed the original design depths alongside structures and guide piles at the site. We have therefore assumed it will not be necessary to analyze the stability of existing offshore and nearshore structures.
• Sediment is anticipated to be disposed of at an in-Bay disposal location (SF-10 or SF-11) rather than at an upland landfill facility.
• The drawing package will be comprised of nine sheets, similar to the 2015 dredge drawings. • Anchor QEA will attend one site visit with the City, as well as up to two meetings (virtual or in person, as appropriate) with the City during the design process. • Any City-requested changes to the draft 90% design documents will be minor in nature, such as grammar correction or formatting. No material changes to the project will be incorporated beyond this phase.
• Bid solicitation and construction management is not included in this scope.

Task 5: Project Management
This task includes an allowance for overall management of the project, including regular meetings, schedule updates, and invoicing for the project manager.

Future Tasks
This scope of work will be considered complete when our final (100%) design documents have been completed and submitted to the City. However, once the design plans have been prepared, Anchor QEA can also support the City in bidding and construction management to guide the project per the technical specifications and regulatory permits. Successful construction projects are attributable, in part, to effective and thorough oversight and management of the contractor’s work, and Anchor QEA’s experience in this regard could be a valuable addition to this project. For example, we commonly participate in and lead pre-bid site visits, provide input to the bid review process, review contractor pre-construction submittals, participate (in person or by phone) in selected construction meetings, and review contractor progress and post-dredge survey pay requests. A separate scope of work and cost estimate for these tasks will be prepared once our current tasks are completed.
19 36
E.

October 22, 2025

Page 5 ends

Estimated Costs
The total cost for completing Tasks 3 through 5 are $77,500, which is based on a time-and-materials, not-to-exceed basis. Table 1 shows the task-specific breakdown of costs for each task. All of our included fee assumptions are dependent on Anchor QEA performing all listed services. Rates will be the same as our current approved scope of work.

Table 1
Proposed Costs
Task Description Anchor QEA Costs
3 Permitting $30,000
4 Dredge Design $32,500
5 Project Management $15,000
Total $77,500
We appreciate the opportunity to provide this cost proposal and look forward to beginning these project tasks. Please do not hesitate to contact me at [email protected], or at (415) 230-0862, if there are any questions or concerns with this proposal.

Sincerely,
Joshua Burnam, MPH, D.Env.

Principal Environmental Planner
20 37
E.
1 of 2
Thursday, November 20, 2025 at 9:21:04 PM Pacific Standard Time Subject:Subject:Subject:Subject: RE: Brisbane dredging - ROM cost evaluation Date: Thursday, November 13, 2025 at 7:40:24AM Pacific Standard Time From: Josh Burnam
To: Rehberg, Andrew, Bozorginia.Maziar
CC: Megan Collins, Amy Williams, Marine Vie
Andrew, Maziar – as a supplement to my email yesterday, here is a table showing a second column that equates to a “high” cost which is also based on some bids we have seen. We thought this might be helpful. Let us know if you want to have a call.

Josh
Entrance Channel and Marina Basin Dredging to
-8 6 MLLW-8 6 MLLW-8 6 MLLW-8 6 MLLW
Task Unit Unit Cost ($/CY) Unit Cost ($/CY)
Payable Payable Payable Payable
QuanFty (Design
Depth + 1 foot
overdepth)overdepth)overdepth)overdepth)
Total Cost Total Cost Total Cost Total Cost
(Low)
Total Cost Total Cost Total Cost Total Cost
(High)
Direct ConstrucFon Costs
MobilizaFon/DemobilizaFon
MobilizaFon/DemobilizaFon LS -- -- $570,400 $813,600
Dredging with Ocean Disposal at SF-11 (Depth + 1 foot paid overdepth) Entrance Channel CY $35 $50 53,960 $1,889,000 $2,698,000 Marina Areas 1-3 CY $35 $50 29,920 $1,048,000 $1,496,000 Marina Areas 4-11 CY $35 $50 75,480 $2,642,000 $3,774,000 Bathymetric Surveying
3rd party measurement and payment surveys unit $12,000 2 $24,000 $24,000 Total Direct ConstrucFon Costs, Base Bid Only $6,173,400$6,173,400$6,173,400$6,173,400 $8,805,600$8,805,600$8,805,600$8,805,600 OPTIONAL: Area 12 CY $35 $50 2,880 $101,000 $144,000
Total Direct ConstrucFon Costs including OpFonal Area $6,274,400$6,274,400$6,274,400$6,274,400 $8,949,600$8,949,600$8,949,600$8,949,600 Notes:

1. These esFmates were developed using current and generally accepted engineering cost esFmaFon methods. Note that these esFmates are based on assumpFons concerning future events, and actual costs may be affected by known and unknown risks including, but not limited to, changes in general economic and business condiFons, site condiFons that were unknown to Anchor QEA, Inc., at the Fme the esFmates were performed, future changes in site condiFons, regulatory or enforcement policy changes, and delays in performance. Actual costs may vary from these esFmates and such variaFons may be material. Anchor QEA, Inc., is not licensed as accountants or securiFes aborneys and, therefore, makes no representaFons that these costs form an appropriate basis for complying with financial reporFng requirements for such costs.

2. All cost esFmates include material, labor, and taxes, unless otherwise noted. Unit costs are esFmated using standard esFmaFng guides (e.g., Means Site Work and Landscape Cost Data), vendors, professional judgment, and experience from similar projects. Costs do not include so6 costs (i.e., design, permigng, inspecFons, or construcFon management), access costs, legal fees, agency oversight, or public relaFons efforts.

Joshua Burnam, MPH, D.Env. Joshua Burnam, MPH, D.Env. Joshua Burnam, MPH, D.Env.

Principal/Federal Market Sector Lead

ANCHOR QEA
[email protected]
33 New Montgomery St
Suite 1210, San Francisco, CA 94105
Direct      415.361.5150
Mobile    949.636.5166
From: Josh Burnam
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2025 1:18 PM
To: Rehberg, Andrew <[email protected]>; Bozorginia.Maziar <[email protected]> Cc: Megan Collins <[email protected]>; Amy Williams <[email protected]>; Marine Vie <[email protected]> Subject:Subject:Subject:Subject: Brisbane dredging - ROM cost evaluaFon Attachment 4
21 38
E.
2 of 2
Maziar, Andrew – wanted to forward along an updated ROM construction cost estimate. This is based on our current view of the market, recent similar projects/bids we are aware of, and of course our knowledge of the last episode at the marina. As you can see from the table below, our rough estimate at this time is about $6.1-$6.3M for construction cost for all areas, with one area being optional as before.   We would have separate fees for construction oversight if you requested that of us (we did that last time). I wanted to provide this now so you can review and be informed.

If we allow dredgers to work outside the window by going to upland disposal sites, which we will present as an optional item to them, it’s possible some cost savings could be achieved, but we can’t specify that at this time. We are allowing for that option with our testing program. In case you are curious, the permits will be good for multiple years (5-10 depending on the permit) and the sediment results are usually good for 3 years.

Please let us know if you want to discuss this.

Thanks,
Josh
Entrance Channel and Marina
Basin Dredging to -8 6 MLLW
Task Unit
Unit
Cost
Payable Payable Payable Payable
QuanFty (Design
Depth + 1 foot
overdepth)overdepth)overdepth)overdepth) Cost
Direct ConstrucFon Costs
MobilizaFon/DemobilizaFon
MobilizaFon/DemobilizaFon LS -- -- $560,300
Dredging with Ocean Disposal at SF-11 (Depth + 1 foot paid overdepth) Entrance Channel CY $35 53,960 $1,889,000
Marina Areas 1-3 CY $35 29,920 $1,048,000
Marina Areas 4-11 CY $35 75,480 $2,642,000
Bathymetric Surveying
3rd party measurement and payment surveys unit $12,000 2 $24,000 Total Direct ConstrucFon Costs, Base Bid Only $6,163,300$6,163,300$6,163,300$6,163,300 OPTIONAL: Area 12 CY $35 2,880 $101,000
Total Direct ConstrucFon Costs including OpFonal Area $6,264,300$6,264,300$6,264,300$6,264,300 Notes:

Rev. 1/26/99 -1-

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, dated _________________, is made by and between THE CITY OF BRISBANE, a municipal corporation ("City"), and ANCHOR QEA, a LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ("Consultant").

RECITALS
A. City desires to retain Consultant for the performance of certain professional design and permitting services for 2026 Marina Dredging Project ("the Project").

B. Consultant represents that Consultant is specially trained, experienced, and qualified to provide such professional services and is willing to do so pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

AGREEMENT

1. Scope of Services. Subject to the direction and approval of City through its staff that City may provide from time to time, Consultant shall perform the services described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

2. Time of Performance. The services of Consultant shall commence upon the execution of this Agreement and shall be satisfactorily completed in accordance with the time schedule set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

3. Responsible Personnel. The personnel acting on behalf of Consultant primarily responsible for performance of the services hereunder shall be Joshua Burnam, Principal Environmental Planner.

4. Compensation. As compensation for all services to be performed by Consultant under this Agreement, Consultant shall be paid the amounts set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Consultant's total compensation exceed the sum of $77,500 without additional authorization from City.

Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to City at the time of payment.

5. Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit billings to City describing in detail the work performed for which payment is requested, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. Billings shall be submitted monthly, or at such other time as agreed upon between City and Consultant. City shall pay Consultant no later than 30 days after approval of the invoice by City staff.

6. Maintenance and Inspection of Records. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, time cards, and other records or documents relating to charges for services or expenditures charged to City, for a Attachment 5
23 40
E.

Rev. 1/26/99 -2-
minimum of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement and shall make the same available to City or its authorized representatives for inspection and audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by City. The right of inspection shall include the right to make extracts and copies.

7. Assignment and Subcontracts. Consultant acknowledges that Consultant's special skill and expertise is a material consideration for City entering into this Agreement.

Consultant shall not assign, subcontract or delegate to any other party the performance of any services to be rendered by Consultant under this Agreement without the prior written approval of City. If City consents to any subcontracting of work, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of the subcontractor.

8. Ownership of Documents. All plans, studies, documents and other writings prepared by and for Consultant in the course of performing its services under this Agreement, except working notes and internal documents, shall become the property of City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party.

Consultant shall, at Consultant's expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request.

9. Independent Contractor. Consultant is, and at all times shall remain, an independent contractor, and not an agent, officer or employee of City. As such independent contractor, neither Consultant nor any of its agents or employees shall be entitled to any salary, fringe benefits, worker's compensation, retirement contributions, sick leave, insurance or other benefit or right connected with employment by City, or any compensation other than as provided in this Agreement. Consultant shall have no power or authority to bind City to any contract or otherwise to incur any obligation or liability for, or on behalf, or in the name of City.

10. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature that are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep and maintain such licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals in full force and effect at all times during the term of this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain a City of Brisbane business license.

11. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations in connection with the performance of its services under this Agreement.

12. Indemnity. Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold City, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers, harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages, injuries, expenses and liabilities, direct or indirect, including attorney's fees, arising out of or in any manner relating to the performance by Consultant of its services under this Agreement or its failure to comply with any of the its obligations contained in this Agreement, and City shall not be liable for any acts or omissions of Consultant.
24 41
E.

Rev. 1/26/99 -3-

13. Insurance. Consultant, at its own expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of this Agreement, insurance policies which satisfy the following requirements:
(a) Type of policies and coverage:
(1) Commercial General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, and $2,000,000 products and completed operations aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage, providing coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form CG 00 01.

The policy shall include a per project or per location general aggregate endorsement. If a per project/location endorsement is not available, the limit for the general aggregate shall be doubled.
(2) Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain business automobile liability insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 each accident combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage, providing coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 Code 1 (any auto).
(3) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain workers' compensation insurance as required by the State of California and employer's liability insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 each accident, $1,000,000 by disease-policy limit, and $1,000,000 by disease-each employee for any and all persons employed directly or indirectly by Consultant in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement. In the alternative, Consultant may rely on a selfinsurance program to provide this coverage so long as the program of selfinsurance complies fully with the provisions of the California Labor Code.

The insurer, if insurance is provided, or Consultant, if a program of selfinsurance is provided, shall waive all rights of subrogation against City for loss arising from work performed by Consultant for City. (4) Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance that insures against professional errors and omissions in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate, covering negligent acts, errors or omissions which may be committed by Consultant in the performance of its services under this Agreement. (b) Endorsements: Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall contain and be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1) The City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of Consultant; on Insurance Services Office form CG 20 10 (or equivalent) for ongoing operations, and on Insurance Services Office form CG 20 37 (or equivalent) for products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant; or 25 42
E.

Rev. 1/26/99 -4-
automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to the Project, Consultant's insurance coverage shall allow and be endorsed primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers shall be excess of Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) The commercial general liability, automobile liability and workers’ compensation policies shall allow and be endorsed to include a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers.
(4) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. (5) Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
(6) Consultant's insurance coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to City. If a carrier will not provide the required notice, the Consultant shall provide written notice to the City no later than five (5) business days before policy modification or cancellation.
(c) Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At City's option, Consultant shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or selfinsured retentions. (d) Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers having a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise approved by City in writing.
(e) Verification of coverage. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required by this Agreement. Certificates of such insurance and endorsements shall be filed with City before commencement of work by Consultant. At the request of City, Consultant shall provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by this Agreement.
26 43
E.

Rev. 1/26/99 -5-

14. Notices. Any notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be either personally delivered or sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the other party as follows:

To City City of Brisbane
Attn.: Public Works Director
50 Park Lane
Brisbane, CA 94005
To Consultant Anchor QEA, LLAC
33 New Montgomery Street, Ste 1210
San Francisco, CA 94105

15. Litigation Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement commences any legal action against the other party to enforce or interpret this Agreement, each party shall bear its own costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees, court costs, expert witness fees, and discovery expenses, incurred in connection with the legal action, regardless of which party may be deemed a prevailing party.

16. Termination of Agreement. This Agreement may be terminated by either party, effective upon written notice, should the other party commit any material default in the performance of its obligations hereunder. This Agreement may also be terminated by either party, for any reason, upon fifteen (15) day's prior written notice to the other party. In the event this Agreement is terminated by City through no fault of Consultant, Consultant shall be compensated for all services performed to the date of termination.

17. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant warrants that it is an Equal Opportunity Employer and shall comply with applicable regulations governing equal opportunity employment.

18. Miscellaneous Provisions.
(a) Severability. Should any portion of this Agreement be declared void or unenforceable in a final decision by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement, which shall continue in full force and effect, provided that the remainder of this Agreement can be reasonably interpreted to implement the intention of the parties.
(b) Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes and cancels all prior agreements or understandings, whether written or verbal.
(c) Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document duly executed by both City and Consultant.
(d) Waiver. The waiver of any breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same provision or any other provision of this Agreement.
27 44
E.

Rev. 1/26/99 -6-
(e) Execution. Each party warrants that the individuals signing this Agreement on its behalf have the legal power and authority to do so and to bind the party to this Agreement.
(f) Successors and Assigns. Subject to the restriction against assignment and subcontracting, this Agreement shall be inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written.

THE CITY OF BRISBANE
By: ____________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________
City Attorney
CONSULTANT:
________________________________
28 45
E.

Rev. 1/26/99 -7-

EXHIBIT A
Description of Services
29 46
E.

Rev. 1/26/99 -8-

EXHIBIT B
Time Schedule for Performance of Services
30 47
E.

Rev. 1/26/99 -9-

EXHIBIT C
Compensation
31 48
E.

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRISBANE APPROVING CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 2 WITH ANCHOR QEA, LLC FOR PERMITTING, FINAL DESIGN AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE 2026 BRISBANE MARINA MAINTENANCE

DREDGING PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Brisbane has previously executed a professional services agreement with Anchor QEA, LLC (“Consultant”) in the amount of $200,000 for sediment characterization and 60% design for the 2026 Brisbane Marina maintenance dredging; and
WHEREAS, the City authorized additional sediment testing work in the amount of $24,000 under the Consultant agreement in September 2025 to evaluate beneficial reuse options, approved within the City’s administrative authority; and WHEREAS, the Consultant has submitted a proposal dated October 22, 2025, for Contract Amendment No. 2 in the amount of $77,500 for permitting, 90% and 100% final dredge design and project management services; and WHEREAS, the cumulative contract value, with the proposed Amendment No. 2, will total $301,500 which exceeds the City Manager’s contract approval authority; and WHEREAS, the City desires to approve Amendment No. 2 in order to ensure the project remains on schedule to bid and construct the dredging episode within the 2026 dredging window; and
WHEREAS, staff anticipates construction costs for the dredging work to be in the range of approximately $6.1 million to $6.3 million (potentially up to $8.9 million under market variability) and will return to Council with a comprehensive funding strategy prior to award of construction; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brisbane as follows:

1. The City Council hereby approves Contract Amendment No. 2 with Anchor QEA, LLC in the amount of $77,500 for permitting, final design and project management services for the 2026 Brisbane Marina Maintenance Dredging Project; and
Attachment 6
32 49
E.

2. The City Manager is authorized to execute the Amendment on behalf of the City, and the Director of Public Works is authorized to carry out all actions and execute all documents necessary to effectuate the Amendment; and

3. Funds for the Amendment are available in the Marina Enterprise Fund (GL 550- 7009-000-52030), and there is no General Fund impact.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this ___ day of __________, 2025, by the City Council of the City of Brisbane by the following vote:

AYES: ___________
NOES: ___________
ABSENT: ___________
ABSTAIN: ___________
_______________________________ _______________________________ Cliff Lentz, Mayor Ingrid Padilla, City Clerk
33 50
E.

File Attachments for Item:

F. Discuss and Provide Direction to Staff Regarding the Potential Installation of a Camera Near the Community Park
51 1
52 F.
2 53
F.
3 54
F.

Camera location is recommended, by staff, to be in the southwest corner of the park. as seen in this visual:

Such a location offers one of the widest visual ranges while also recognizing privacy issues related to the playground and bathroom facilities.

If the Council wishes to pursue this pilot, staff will return with a data retention policy, any additional costs, and other items at a council meeting later this winter.

Attachments:

1. Sept 18 2025 Staff Report

2. Sept 18, 2025 Minutes (relevant excerpt)

3. Verkada Proposal
Jeremy Dennis, City Manager
Camera at Community Park Follow-Up
4 55
F.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: September 18, 2025
From: Jeremy Dennis, City Manager
Subject: Discussion – Installation of a Camera at the Community Park Recommendation
Per the request of Councilmember Kern, Staff recommends discussion on the potential installation of cameras at Community Park.

Background
At the September 4, 2025 City Council meeting, Councilmember Kern requested the City Council agendize a discussion regarding the potential installation of cameras at Community Park. Below is a summary of the potential uses of a camera, how other local communities have utilized cameras in their public spaces. And costs associated with such installations.

Examples of Use
Municipalities install cameras for a variety of reasons:
• Increasing the visibility of a public area (such as a webcam that overlooks a park, building or street
• Enhancing public safety/increasing the number of investigative tools in the event of a crime or incident
o Providing deterrence from future criminal activity or incidents • Increasing the visibility of a public infrastructure project’s construction progress • Providing real-time traffic/outdoor facility use updates • Coordinating emergency response coordination/increasing visibility in high-fire areas The City of Brisbane has installed cameras at the following locations:
• City Hall and Annex
• Corpyard
• Community Pool
• Marina
• Right of way location at Main Street and Bayshore Blvd to deter/monitor/investigate illegal dumping
Discussion – Installation of a Camera at the Community Park Attachment 1
5 56
F.

Case Uses from Local Municipalities
To learn more about the usage of cameras in public spaces, staff surveyed neighboring cities to learn more about their experiences with cameras in community parks. The following information was received:
• Burlingame: Installed four cameras at Washington Park four years ago in response to ongoing concerns regarding graffiti. Staff selected Arlo Pro cameras, as it was a cost effective and simple solution. The camera footage is not accessed publicly, and the Parks Department and Police Department have access to the footage. Burlingame has been able to apprehend individuals who have vandalized the park. The biggest issue was difficulty with Wi-Fi connectivity.
• Millbrae: Installed the Verkada camera system both inside and outside of recreation center along with visibility into Central Park. The cameras are smart cameras that track movement. The Parks and Recreation Department have access to the footage and review footage on an as-needed basis. If needed, clips may be sent to the police department. • Redwood City: Installed different types of cameras throughout the city. Some high end Verkada cameras, and a few simple webcams based on the location. The footage is not publicly accessible.
• South San Francisco: Installed the Verkada camera system along with an Avigilion system.

While the system is not actively monitored, footage is pulled on an as-needed basis. The city does have a Verkada livecam for the aquatic center construction project. You can view it at www.ssf.net/newpool.
• San Carlos: Installed cameras at their parks and public facilities. The city upgraded their cameras to 360 cameras in 2017 for select facilities. The Sherriff’s office is able to review camera footage as necessary and IT staff have permission to review only to determine if the cameras are functioning property. The footage is not publicly accessible. The total project cost was $450,000.

Costs of Various Camera Systems
The use of a public-facing camera system has a direct relationship to the cost of purchase, installation, and subscriptions. In the case of a system intended to bring visibility to an amenity, construction project, or other similar use, a standard webcam system, Webcams are typically consumer grade and used for personal video communication. Many webcams are plug-and-play by utilizing a USB, they have a fixed lens without the ability to zoom or pan. Webcams also are lower resolution (720p to 1080p) with a limited field of view and no built-in streaming protocols. Common webcams include Arlo Pro, Logitech C920, Razer Kiyo, and Microsoft LifeCam. Data may be stored in the cloud and remote access is available. The cost of webcams may range from $50 to over $250 per camera. The City’s webcam purchased to curb illegal Discussion – Installation of a Camera at the Community Park 6 57
F.
dumping cost $250 per camera plus a $25 per month subscription fee.

As noted above, some cities utilizing camera systems which have the capability to provide realtime camera feeds. Designated staff may monitor the camera with remote access and view from their smartphones, tablets, or desktops. These systems also allow for centralized control of multiple locations including city halls, police stations, and public parks. The automation feature triggers alerts based on motion, door access, or license plate recognition. While Verkada is widely used, other systems include PTZOptics, Sony SRG series, and Panasonic AW series to name a few.

In gathering cost information, Staff received quotes for two types of cameras provided by Qovo Solutions, Inc. The Artificial Intelligence (AI) Camera has the ability to analyze audio and dispatch law enforcement. Audio triggers may include screaming or a car crash. The camera pans and has the ability to zoom. It is cloud based and costs approximately $9,000 per camera plus $10,000 for installation and an annual licensing fee of $400. The second camera is a traditional dome, fixed camera. While also cloud based, it does not have the ability to zoom or pan and does not have audio. The cost per camera is approximately $16,000 plus $10,000 for installation and a $500 licensing fee.

Best Practice
Best practices when implementing public facing cameras include creation of transparent policies, limiting data retention, restricting access to footage, and complying with any privacy laws.

Should Council wish to proceed, Staff anticipates creating a camera policy based on best practices that also incorporate an auditing component, similar to the audit requirements provided by the Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) policies. The audit allows the Police Commander or the Chief of Police to conduct an audit of ALPR browsing inquiries at least monthly each calendar year. The audit is documented and reviewed by the Chief of Police and retained in a secure location.

Discussion
Staff recommends the City Council weigh the costs and benefits of the various types of camera systems and provide staff direction on whether to continue to explore installation of a camera at Community Park.

Discussion – Installation of a Camera at the Community Park Fiscal Impact
The fiscal impact to the City is dependent on the camera system selected.

Attachments
___________________________________
Jeremy Dennis, City Manager
7 58
F.

Attachment 2
8 59
F.

Remote Series
www.verkada.com [email protected] 1
Overview
The CR63-E remote camera is quick to deploy and easy to move, providing coverage even in areas that lack power or internet.

It has a built-in battery and LTE modem and supports various power supplies, including solar.

If continuous power is available, the CR63-E can be hardwired via included AC and passive PoE adapters.1 For deployments in areas without existing power infrastructure, a solar panel and one or more backup batteries can be used. A built-in LTE modem simplifies install without the need for a standalone cellular gateway.

The CR63-E provides 24/7 streaming and impeccable image quality with 4K resolution and optical zoom. An onboard CV75S Ambarella processor supports advanced analytics like AI-powered search, AI-powered unified timeline, line crossing, loitering, person of interest (POI) alerts, and license plate recognition (LPR).

With sealed interior components and IP66/IP67 weather and IK10 impact ratings, the CR63-E withstands extreme temperatures and excessive precipitation, allowing it to be deployed in a variety of indoor or outdoor environments.

CR63-E Remote Camera with LTE
Easily Monitor Areas
Without Power or Internet
Various power supply options
• Passive PoE,1 DC, and power tap adapters
• External backup battery
• 65W or 100W solar panel
Advanced analytics
• Onboard CV75S Ambarella processor enables people
and vehicle analytics
• License plate recognition capabilities capture license plates at speeds up to 80 mph / 128 kph
• AI-powered search and AI-powered alerts
• Occupancy trends for operational insights
Hybrid cloud architecture
• Onboard storage and processing for reduced bandwidth
consumption and coverage at scale
• 30 - 120 days (512GB - 3TB) of onboard storage
• Redundant cloud backup and unlimited cloud-based
archiving of footage
Excellent image quality
• 4K resolution
• 1 / 1.2” progressive CMOS image sensor
• Varifocal lens with 2.25x optical zoom
• 30m / 98ft of IR range for nighttime viewing
Built-in LTE connectivity
• Built-in LTE modem to provide connectivity in areas
without internet
• Choose between Verkada’s data plan or bring your own
Key features
www.verkada.com 0925 [email protected] 1

1. PoE pigtail must be used with 48-57V passive PoE
Attachment 3
9 60
F.

Remote Series
www.verkada.com [email protected] 2
Verkada Data Plan
Key benefits
Bring Your Own Data Plan
Verkada takes away the challenge of working with cell carriers with our hassle-free data plan, which works out of the box in many countries across the world.

Customers also have the option to bring their own data plan. For a list of carriers that have been tested and verified by Verkada, please refer to the knowledge base article.

Unlimited data
Unlike most carriers, which throttle your speed after a certain threshold, Verkada offers truly unlimited data.

Country/region
US
24/7 support
Enjoy the quick and easy 24/7 customer support that
you’ve come to expect from Verkada.

Carriers used
Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile
Instant connectivity out of the box
As soon as it receives power, the CR63-E’s built-in modem will automatically connect to a carrier using the pre-inserted Verkada SIM card – it just works.

Multi-carrier redundancy
The Verkada SIM card works across major carriers,
allowing the CR63-E to automatically switch
carriers if the current network is down.

Always connected
Customers can insert their own SIM card in one slot while keeping the Verkada SIM in the other slot for automatic failover.

If the customer-provided SIM fails, the Verkada SIM helps ensure that the camera is always reachable.

Flexible configuration
Customers may also use their own SIM cards in both
slots. In this case, customers can configure one slot
as the primary SIM and use the other for automatic
failover if needed.
10 61
F.

Remote Series
www.verkada.com [email protected] 3
Image Sensor 1 / 1.2" Progressive CMOS Shutter Speed 1 / 30 sec. to 1 / 10,000 sec.

Sensor Resolution1 4K (3840 x 2160) Day/Night IR-cut filter for day and night function Lens Type Varifocal; motorized zoom (2.25x) IR Cut Filter Yes Focal Length 5.9 - 13.3mm IR Range 30m / 98ft; non-adjustable Aperture F1.5 - F2.9 Minimum Illumination 0.009 lux @ F1.9 (Color) 0 lux with IR Illuminators on
Iris P-Iris Onboard Storage Capacity: From 512GB to 3TB Card: MicroSD, SDXC
Field of View (after LDC2)
Horizontal: 109° - 49° (102° - 47°)
Vertical: 58° - 28° (58° - 27°)
Diagonal: 113° - 55° (107° - 53°)
CPU Ambarella CV75S88
Sensor Movement
Tilt: 0° to 90°
Pan: 360°
Rotation: 360°
Compression H.265, H.264 Historical Video Settings Adaptive quality1 Frame Rate3 24fps Live Streaming Settings High quality (HQ): Up to 4,500 Kbps (default) Standard quality (SQ): Up to 600 Kbps
Audio Supported Interface Built-in microphone
Audio Capacity One-way audio Effective Range 5m / 16ft
Camera features
Standard video settings
Standard audio settings
CR63-E
Tech Specs

1. All our cameras record in "adaptive quality," capturing both standard (SQ) and high quality (HQ) streams. SQ video is stored up to the amount of retention specified by the customer. The amount of HQ video stored on the camera will depend on the amount of motion detected by the camera over time. To learn more, visit our website:
https://docs.verkada.com/docs/adaptive-quality-recording-whitepaper.pdf

2. Lens Distortion Correction (LDC) crops the sensor field of view to deliver a rectified, undistorted output image.

3. Frame rate can be adjusted by support.
11 62
F.

Remote Series
www.verkada.com [email protected] 4
Power Input
MC4 Pigtail for Solar Panel
RJ45 for Passive POE
DC Power Adapter
Connectivity RJ-45 cable connector for passive
PoE connection
Power Consumption
54VDC, 1.2A, 65W Barrel Jack
(6.5/3mm OD/ID)
48-57V, 1.35-1.14A, 65W Passive POE
16-40V 6-2.4A, 96W, DC Solar input
RTSP
RTSP 1.0
RFC 2326
Max concurrent streams: 2
Audio support: Yes
Power and network
Connectivity LTE cellular CAT 6 MIMO 2x2 DL MIMO
SIM 2 SIM slots (Nano 4FF)
Dual SIM/auto SIM failover Bands
B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B13, B14, B17,
B18, B19, B20, B25, B26, B28. B29, B30, B38,
B39, B40, B41, B42, B43, B48 (CBRS), B66, B71
Carriers Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile
Cellular
Operating Temperature -40°C to 50°C / -40°F to 122°F LED Indicator 1 status LED, 2 SIM indicator LEDs, 4 signal strength LEDs
Humidity 0 to 90% Warranty 5 Years
Certifications IK10 impact rating, IP66/IP67 weather
rating, FY2019 NDAA compliant Included Accessories
Mount plate, pole mount, T10 Torx security
screwdriver, T25 Torx security allen key,
4x M4 x 25mm PH2, 4x wall anchors, MC4
pigtail, PoE pigtail, barrel jack pigtail, 2x small
pole straps, 2x large pole straps, 1x Verkada
SIM card
General
CR63-E
Tech Specs
12 63
F.

Remote Series
www.verkada.com [email protected] 5
CR63-E
Tech Specs
Weight 3700g / 130.51oz Body Plastic casing with aluminum base and ball joint
Dimensions
L: 254.0mm / 10.00in
W: 101.6mm / 4.00in
H: 317.5mm / 12.50in
Mechanical
Alerts
Camera status, motion detection,
people detection, vehicle detection,
person of interest detection, crowd
detection, line-crossing detection,
loitering detection, AI-powered alerts
Streaming and Storage
Cloud backup, configurable retention days,
selectable storage location, low bandwidth
mode, timelapse, RTSP
People Analytics
People search, attribute search, face
search, occupancy trends, motion search,
trajectory analysis, selective face blurring,
AI-powered search
Sharing and Privacy Live links, live face blur, privacy regions, audit log
Vehicle Analytics
Vehicle search, attribute search,
motion search, trajectory analysis,
occupancy trends, AI-powered search
License Plate Recognition License Plate of Interest alerts, license plate indexing
Software capabilities
254.00mm / 10.00in 101.6mm / 4.00in
Dimensions
317.5mm / 12.50in
13 64
F.

Remote Series
www.verkada.com [email protected] 6
Model Number MP1 WDR Lens IR Range Onboard
Storage
Maximum
SQ Onboard
Retention1
People/
Vehicle
Analytics
Cost
(MSRP) USD
CR63-512E-HW 4K Zoom 30m / 98ft 512GB 30 Days $3,499
CR63-1TBE-HW 4K Zoom 30m / 98ft 1TB 60 Days $4,299
CR63-2TBE-HW 4K Zoom 30m / 98ft 2TB 90 Days $5,399
CR63-3TBE-HW 4K Zoom 30m / 98ft 3TB 120 Days $6,699
CR63-E pricing

1. All our cameras record in "adaptive quality," capturing both standard and high quality streams. Standard quality (SQ) video is stored up to the amount of retention specified by the customer. The amount of high quality video stored on the camera will depend on the amount of motion detected by the camera over time. To learn more, visit our website:
https://docs.verkada.com/docs/adaptive-quality-recording-whitepaper.pdf Ordering Information
14 65
F.

Remote Series
www.verkada.com [email protected] 7
Video Security Cloud License pricing (Renewal)
Model Number Description Cost (MSRP) USD
LIC-CAM-1Y-RNW 1-Year Camera License, Renewal $199
LIC-CAM-3Y-RNW 3-Year Camera License, Renewal $549
LIC-CAM-5Y-RNW 5-Year Camera License, Renewal $899
LIC-CAM-10Y-RNW 10-Year Camera License, Renewal $1,799
Video Security Cloud License pricing (New/Capacity Increase) Model Number Description Cost (MSRP) USD
LIC-CAM-1Y-CAP 1-Year Camera License, Capacity Increase $199 LIC-CAM-3Y-CAP 3-Year Camera License, Capacity Increase $549 LIC-CAM-5Y-CAP 5-Year Camera License, Capacity Increase $899 LIC-CAM-10Y-CAP 10-Year Camera License, Capacity Increase $1,799 Ordering Information
15 66
F.

Remote Series
www.verkada.com [email protected] 8
Ordering Information
Cellular Data Plan (New/Capacity Increase)
Cellular Data Plan (Renewal)
Model Number Description Cost (MSRP) USD
LIC-GC-1VD-1Y-CAP
1-Year Cellular Gateway Data Plan,
Includes Unlimited Data for 1 Verkada Video Device,
Capacity Increase
$999
LIC-GC-1VD-3Y-CAP
3-Year Cellular Gateway Data Plan,
Includes Unlimited Data for 1 Verkada Video Device,
Capacity Increase
$2,997
LIC-GC-1VD-5Y-CAP
5-Year Cellular Gateway Data Plan,
Includes Unlimited Data for 1 Verkada Video Device,
Capacity Increase
$4,995
Model Number Description Cost (MSRP) USD
LIC-GC-1VD-1Y-RNW
1-Year Cellular Gateway Data Plan,
Includes Unlimited Data for 1 Verkada Video Device,
Renewal
$999
LIC-GC-1VD-3Y-RNW
3-Year Cellular Gateway Data Plan,
Includes Unlimited Data for 1 Verkada Video Device,
Renewal
$2,997
LIC-GC-1VD-5Y-RNW
5-Year Cellular Gateway Data Plan,
Includes Unlimited Data for 1 Verkada Video Device,
Renewal
$4,995
Each data plan license includes unlimited data for one video device.

Customers bringing their own SIM/data plan do not need to purchase data plan licenses.

Each data plan license includes unlimited data for one video device.

Customers bringing their own SIM/data plan do not need to purchase data plan licenses. 16 67
F.

Remote Series
www.verkada.com [email protected] 9
Accessories pricing
Model Number Description Cost (MSRP) USD
ACC-BAT-430WH-E-1 430Wh Backup Battery for CR Camera $1,399 ACC-MNT-SOLP-1 Solar Panel Pole Mount $499
ACC-POLE-1 12ft / 3.7m Above Grade Pole for Use
with CR Camera and Accessories $999
ACC-SOLP-65W-1 65 Watt Solar Panel $199
ACC-SOLP-100W-1 100 Watt Solar Panel $269
Ordering Information
17 68
F.

Remote Series
www.verkada.com [email protected] 10
Ordering Information
Viewing Station License pricing (New/Capacity Increase) Viewing Station License pricing (Renewal)
Model Number Description Cost (MSRP) USD
LIC-VX-1Y-CAP 1-Year Viewing Station License, Capacity Increase $499 LIC-VX-3Y-CAP 3-Year Viewing Station License, Capacity Increase $1,299 LIC-VX-5Y-CAP 5-Year Viewing Station License, Capacity Increase $1,999 LIC-VX-10Y-CAP 10-Year Viewing Station License, Capacity Increase $3,999 Model Number Description Cost (MSRP) USD
LIC-VX-1Y-RNW 1-Year Viewing Station License, Renewal $499 LIC-VX-3Y-RNW 3-Year Viewing Station License, Renewal $1,299 LIC-VX-5Y-RNW 5-Year Viewing Station License, Renewal $1,999 LIC-VX-10Y-RNW 10-Year Viewing Station License, Renewal $3,999 Viewing Station pricing
Model Number Description Cost (MSRP) USD
VX52-HW VX52 Viewing Station $499
18 69
F.

File Attachments for Item:

G. Discuss and Provide Direction to Staff Regarding the Potential Use of Nonconformity Code for Properties Adjacent to the Community Park
70 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: December 4, 2025
From: Jeremy Dennis, City Manager
Subject: Discussion/Direction, Nonconformity Use Application to Properties Adjacent to Community Park
Recommendation
As requested by Mayor Lentz and Mayor Pro Tem Mackin, staff recommend that the City Council provide direction to staff regarding the potential use of nonconformity code for properties adjacent to the Community Park.

Background
At the November 20, 2025 City Council Meeting, a study session was held regarding the 70 Old County Road Planning Program. Good City Company, consultant under contract to the City on this project, presented an update on community engagement to date. This initial community outreach consisted of: two Open Houses, two Pop-Up Workshops, and a Vision Concept Survey.

Council was given comprehensive data on community feedback including preferred concepts, suggestions, and visions.

The Council recently formed an ad hoc subcommittee to review potential options for the entrance to Brisbane. This part of Brisbane, generally understood to be the “Parkside” area, consists of approximately 25 acres of publicly and privately owned properties including the Cityowned 70 Old County Road parcel. The Subcommittee was created to examine potential for incorporation of preferred concepts expressed by residents during recent community outreach. 1 Nonconformity Use Application to Properties Adjacent to Community Park 71 G.

Discussion
Nonconformity Regulations
The City of Brisbane Zoning Ordinance (BMC Title 17) establishes the City’s zoning districts and specifies permitted and conditionally permitted uses with each zoning district. Title 17 further sets forth regulations governing non-conforming uses which are existing uses that do not comply with the existing zoning regulations.

The City has the legal authority to establish zoning districts and apply zoning districts to private property to provide for the orderly development of the City in accordance with established goals and policies. The City’s land use goals and policies are set forth in the General Plan and zoning districts are applied to properties, consistent with the General Plan.

If the City determines that the City’s long term development pattern should be modified for the City’s health, safety and welfare, the City has the right to amend the General Plan and zoning on private property or properties, subject to the public hearing process. If the City were to amend the general plan and rezone properties such that existing land uses do not conform to the new regulations, such uses would be considered legal nonconforming and subject the nonconforming use provisions set forth in BMC 17.38 (attached).

In general, the nonconforming use provisions are intended to facilitate the transition of nonconforming uses to conforming uses over time while protecting existing use rights. While 2 Nonconformity Use Application to Properties Adjacent to Community Park 72 G.
existing nonconforming uses are permitted to continue operations, they are not allowed to expand or transition from one nonconforming use to another.

It would be up to the City Council to direct staff to initiate a general plan amendment and rezoning that would render an existing use nonconforming.

Properties Suggested for Nonconformity Regulations
Mayor Lentz and Mayor Pro Tem Mackin recommend that the City Council direct staff and the Planning Commission to consider implementation of nonconformity regulations on the warehouse properties that are immediately adjacent to the Community Park located at (Attachment 2):
• 125 Valley (Heirloom)
• 41 Park Place (SFO Apparel)
• 280 Old County Road (Post Office)
Such regulations would be in place temporarily as staff work with the Parkside 2 Subcommittee and the potentially affected property owners. Implementation would ensure that Council has adequate time to consider planning options for the subject area under review.

Fiscal Impact
Should the City Council wish to pursue the application of nonconformity regulations temporarily on the properties above, staff resources would be required to produce relevant work product, as well as supporting the Planning Commission on their review.

Attachments:

1. Relevant Excerpts, Section 17.38 Brisbane Municipal Code (Nonconforming Use)

2. Map of Planning Area
___________________________________
Jeremy Dennis, City Manager
3 Nonconformity Use Application to Properties Adjacent to Community Park 73 G.

EXCERPTS BMC Section 17.38

17.38.020 - Change or replacement of nonconforming use.

A . A nonconforming use shall not be changed to or replaced by another nonconforming use.

B. A nonconforming use which is changed to or replaced by a conforming use shall not be re-established. Where any portion of a nonconforming facility is changed from a nonconforming use to a conforming use, such portion shall thereafter only be used for a conforming use.

17.38.30 - Expansion of nonconforming uses.

A. Except as otherwise provided in subsection B. of this 17.38.030 and Section 17.38.110 of this chapter, a nonconforming use may not be enlarged, expanded or intensified. This prohibition shall include any enlargement, expansion or intensification of a nonconforming use which:

1.Increases the site area or floor area occupied by the nonconforming use; or 2 Increases the amount, volume, or intensity of nonconforming business use, or the machinery, equipment, trade fixtures or other personal property utilized in the conduct of such use; or

3.Displaces any conforming use occupying a structure or site.

17.38.040 - Maintenance and repair of nonconforming facility.

A. Nonconforming facilities may be continued, maintained and repaired so as to protect the health and safety of the occupants and preserve the useful life of the structure.

B, Nonconforming facilities may be remodeled and the interior reconfigured so long as there is no enlargement, expansion, or intensification of the nonconforming use, except as otherwise permitted by subsection B. of Section 17.38.030.
(Ord. 478 § 2(part), 2003).

17.38.050 - Abandonment of nonconforming uses.

A. Whenever a nonconforming nonresidential use has been abandoned, such use shall not be resumed or re-established and all subsequent uses of the site shall conform with the requirements of this title.

Discontinuance of a nonconforming nonresidential use for a period of one hundred twenty (120) consecutive days or more shall conclusively be presumed an abandonment of such use; provided, however, discontinuance under any of the following circumstances shall not be considered an abandonment of the use:

1. Any discontinuance of use in connection with a pending sale or other transfer of ownership or management of the nonconforming use to a designated person or persons and the discontinuance of use is solely for the purpose of accomplishing the sale or transfer.

2. Any discontinuance of use during a reasonable period of reconstruction or replacement of the damaged or destroyed nonconforming facility, where such reconstruction or replacement is permitted under the provisions of Section 17.38.060.

3.Any other circumstance found by the planning commission to have been beyond the reasonable control of the person conducting the use, and such person commences the activity necessary for re-establishment of the use and prosecutes the same diligently to completion.

17.38.060 - Reconstruction or replacement of nonconforming facility.

A nonconforming facility which is damaged or destroyed may be reconstructed or replaced for continued occupancy by the nonconforming use or uses previously conducted therein, subject to the following limitations:
4 Attachment 1
74 G.

A. The site area or floor area occupied by the nonconforming use, and the intensity of activity conducted by the nonconforming use, subsequent to reconstruction or replacement of the facility shall not exceed that existing prior to the damage or destruction of the facility, except as otherwise permitted by subsection B. of 17.38.030.

B. The reconstructed or replaced facility shall comply with all of the applicable regulations of this title, other than the use of the structure, and all applicable provisions of the building, health, and fire codes.
5 75
G.

Mariposa
St
Valley
Dr
San Bruno Ave
Visitacion Ave
Tunnel Ave
Park Pl
Old County
Rd
O
l
d
C
o
u
nty Rd
Park
Ln
Alvarado St
S
a
n
F
r
a
n
c
i
s
c
o
A
v
e
Quarry
Rd Inyo St
Bayshore
Blvd
Tunnel Ave
Bayshore
Blvd
43 11
4 1
100
411
280
105
453
15 1
37 91
460
200
10 200
200
200
31 70
436
5 25
165
60 141
200
200
10 235
18 419
438 90
200
200
1 10
240
100
1 200
30 200
1 21
125
277
3435
447
200
432 22
55 200
200
49 2
140
185
23 3445
462 15
20 200
200
50 14
29 1
200
200
118
200
120
209
200
200
151
200
1 7
125
200
20 Sources: Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, Sources: Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community 12/01/2025
r
Parcels (SMCO GIS Dept)
City Owned Parcels
UPRC Land Granted to Brisbane
DISCLAIMER: The information provided herein is intended solely for general planning and reference purposes and is made available on an “AS IS” basis. The City of Brisbane makes no warranties, either expressed or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information displayed or referenced. This data shall not be used as a substitute for legal documentation, nor shall it be relied upon for matters requiring precise boundary or ownership determinations. For authoritative and legally defensible delineation of property boundaries, or legal, engineering, or construction-related decisions, the services of a licensed land surveyor should be obtained.

P r i v a t e & C i t y O w n e d P a r c e l s Potential Non-Conforming Parcels 76 G.

File Attachments for Item:

I. Countywide Assignments and Subcommittee Reports
i. Parkside 2 Ad Hoc Subcommittee Update
ii.Report Out on Subcommittee Meetings
iii. Upcoming Subcommittee Meetings
77 CITY of BRISBANE
Council Subcommittee Update
From November 17th, 2025, to November 26th, 2025

1. Report Out on Subcommittees/Committees
A. Public Art Advisory Committee 11/17 Davis, O’Connell The committee received an overview from Economic Vitality Director Mitch Bull. They discussed ways for integrating public art into business partnerships. The group spoke about the Crocker Trail Master Plan, which outlines opportunities for integrating art along the trail and collaborating with businesses in the Crocker Park. They also expressed interest in including the downtown area and Sierra Point Parkway in future efforts.

The subcommittee received public comment regarding the frog habitat on the Crocker Trail. They asked if the Public Art Committee would consider educational signage in the future that may help preserve the sensitive habitat area. The committee would be interested in agendizing this topic in the future.

Parks & Recreation Director Leek presented to the committee the updated Public Art Master Plan webpage and the interactive map of existing art in Brisbane, which brings together photographs, artist bios, history and details for the City’s public art pieces.

Next Steps #1: The committee asked staff to send a link for the solicitation of the Artful Bench Program Request for Proposal.

To view the meeting, please visit:
https://www.brisbaneca.org/bc-artadvisory/meeting/public-art-advisory-committee-25 B. Sea Level Rise Subcommittee 11/18 Lentz, Mackin
The subcommittee met with Schaff & Wheeler who are developing the Brisbane Lagoon Watershed Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan in order to meet plan requirements that local governments within BCDC’s jurisdiction must meet when submitting Subregional Plans. The firm discussed climate impacts, existing conditions, possible nature based and habitat enhancement measures, as well as possible engineering mitigation measures. The subcommittee also received an update on community outreach and upcoming engagement opportunities, which will continue through Winter 2026/2027 and will include additional community meetings and pop-up events. The firm would like feedback on other outreach opportunities, such as a community survey or photo contest to get more feedback on the draft project alternatives. Councilmembers will consider which community outreach project they would like to see.
78 I.

Feedback given to Schaff & Wheeler included: defining existing public access; considering beneficial solutions for private owners around lagoon shoreline; clarifying recreational access versus enhancing existing access; exploring a Bay Trail connection; expanding study to include creek overflow warning systems; and researching the type of fill used under the roadway.

The subcommittee received public comment regarding the costs for each mitigation measure being proposed to assist in decision-making.

The subcommittee then received an update from Len Materman and Summer Bundy of OneShoreline regarding their Brisbane Shoreline Resilience Plan, BCDC’s Regional Shoreline Adaptation Plan (RSAP), and pending Measure AA Grant application. RSAP was adopted in December 2024 with key elements focused on One Bay Vision, strategic regional priorities, and guidelines for local shoreline adaptation plans. In June 2025, the Ocean Protection Council approved a $750k Senate Bill 1 Sea Level Rise Planning Grant for the Brisbane Shoreline Resilience Plan. Materman and Bundy reviewed the requirements, minimum standards, planning process, community engagement, project implementation, funding opportunities and anticipated schedule. The Brisbane Lagoon study will also inform the RSAP.

The Measure AA grant proposal is focused on rehabilitating Brisbane’s offshore environment. The restoration goals include 100+ acres of eelgrass, 50 acres of oyster habitat elements and increase ecological restoration benefits to the larger food web for the Bay.

There was discussion about the section of Sierra Point Parkway under HWY 101 that receives water overflow from the highway above, and as there is no drainage, water pools heavily. This is not included in either study as it is more of a Caltrans issue than a sea level rise issue, but it is an issue that should be addressed.

To view the Brisbane Lagoon presentation and the Brisbane Shoreline presentation, please go to:
https://www.brisbaneca.org/citycouncil/meeting/sea-level-rise-subcommittee

2. Upcoming Subcommittees:

Liaison to P&R Commission Subcommittee 12/8 5:30pm Davis, Kern Housing Subcommittee 12/15 3:30pm Davis, Kern (Alt)
Fiscal Policy Subcommittee 12/16 1:30pm Mackin, O’Connell Emergency Preparation Subcommittee 12/16 4:30pm Davis, Kern Public Art Advisory Committee 1/16 5:15pm Davis, O’Connell

3. Proposed Subcommittees:

Does any councilmember wish to propose any items for a subcommittee to discuss? 79 I.

Brisbane City CouncilDecember 4, 2025

Brisbane City Council
December 4, 2025