Parcel R Park Planning - 65% concept design review Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: 3/12/2026
To: Sierra Point Park and Open Space Subcommittee
From: Noreen Leek, Parks & Recreation Director
Maziar Bozorginia, Public Works Director
Subject: Receive update regarding Parcel R park planning and review the 65% concept plans from CMG Landscape Architecture
Recommendation
Receive and review the 65% concept plans for Parcel R from CMG Landscape Architecture and provide feedback to the CMG team for revisions before the subsequent stage of planning.
Background
The Commission first considered this item at its January 14, 2026 meeting, during which staff presented an overview of the project to date. The Commission elected to establish an ad hoc subcommittee to further evaluate the site’s constraints and opportunities before bringing the matter back to the full Commission. The subcommittee conducted a site visit at Parcel R on January 28, 2026 to walk the property, ask questions of City staff, and begin developing a vision for the site. They also met on February 4, 2026 to consolidate initial observations and prepare for discussion with the full Commission.
On February 5, 2026, the City Council approved a contract and scope amendment authorizing CMG Landscape Architecture to prepare conceptual designs for Parcel R and provide associated cost estimates. The intent of this work is to develop a concept plan that reflects feasible park amenities and landscaping within the site footprint, informed by community input.
The Parks and Recreation Commission continued its discussion on February 11, 2026, focusing on site priorities and developing a formal recommendation to the Council subcommittee regarding park development at Parcel R. In forming its recommendations, the Commission considered site and budget constraints as well as factors such as accessibility compliance, placemaking opportunities, broad appeal across diverse user groups, long-term durability, maintenance requirements, and connectivity. The Commission’s recommendation to the Council subcommittee is included as Attachment 1 and was also provided to CMG to help inform the development of the conceptual designs.
Discussion
At this time, the Council subcommittee is tasked with reviewing the draft conceptual designs at 65% and should provide comments and feedback to the CMG team. The 65% concept plan illustrates organization and layout of the landscape, recreational amenities, and site features, and indicates ecological character. Following this step, CMG will refine the preferred concept plan to 95% completion, and a rough order of magnitude pricing will be developed. This item will return to the Council subcommittee within the next 30 days for additional discussion.
Parcel R Park Planning - 65% concept design review Page 2 of 2 Attachments
Attachment 1 Memorandum from P&R Commission regarding Park Development at Parcel R Attachment 2 DRAFT 65% Conceptual designs from CMG
___________________________________
Noreen Leek, Parks & Recreation Director
Maziar Bozorginia, Public Works Director
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 12, 2026
TO: City Council Sierra Point Park & Open Space Subcommittee FROM: Parks & Recreation Commission
SUBJECT: Park Development at Parcel R
The Parks & Recreation Commission appreciates the opportunity to provide guidance on this significant park development initiative and views it as a meaningful opportunity to connect diverse user groups and visitors while fostering civic pride in Brisbane’s public spaces. The proposed development at Parcel R directly advances the Council-adopted Community Goals by promoting community engagement, strengthening integration with local businesses, enhancing recreational opportunities and public art, and elevating overall quality of life for residents. The project further underscores the value of inclusivity by creating welcoming spaces that encourage interaction among individuals of varying ages, cultural backgrounds, economic circumstances, and professions.
The Commission initially considered the development of a park at Parcel R in January 2026 and received a comprehensive project overview from staƯ. In light of the proposed project timeline, the Commission determined that it would be prudent to establish an ad hoc subcommittee to evaluate the site’s constraints and opportunities in greater detail before returning the item to the full Commission for further deliberation.
The ad hoc subcommittee convened at Parcel R on January 28, 2026, to conduct a site visit, ask questions of City staƯ, and to initiate the visioning process. The subcommittee subsequently met on February 4, 2026, to synthesize its observations and refine its preliminary concepts in advance of their discussion with the full Commission. The meeting notes from February 4, 2026, are attached to this memorandum.
On February 5, 2026, the City Council approved a contract and scope amendment for CMG Landscape Architecture to develop conceptual designs within the footprint of Parcel R with the goal being to create a concept design that will reflect feasible park amenities within Parcel R based on community input.
The full Commission met again on February 11, 2026, to identify key priorities and recommendations for the site. Their decision-making process considered geographic and financial limitations, accessibility compliance, placemaking, broad appeal across diverse user groups, longevity, durability and maintenance requirements, and overall connectivity. The Commission reached consensus regarding its highest priorities for the site, which are outlined as follows:
1. Improved accessibility to the site and connectivity to adjacent areas. This may include:
enhancement of the current decomposed granite pathway to serve as an alternate to the existing Bay Trail, landscaping improvements to allow for a continuous trail from the South to the North end of the site or extending sidewalks to improve pedestrian safety.
2. Strategic earthwork to create gathering spaces that are protected from the wind. This may include: a plaza, amphitheater, picnic areas, or benches.
3. Active recreation opportunities. This may include: bike skills features, play amenities, or a designated area for food trucks to support special events.
4. Public Art. This may include: gateway signage to support placemaking, educational or historical installations, kinetic art, artful benches, or other public art installations.
The Commission also wishes to articulate a set of guiding principles to inform and frame future development of the site. These principles include preserving the peace, serenity, and natural beauty of the area; ensuring the project is thoughtfully future-proofed; selecting durable, low-maintenance materials; incorporating opportunities for modest revenue generation; and allowing for a phased implementation approach as additional funding becomes available.
The Parks & Recreation Commission appreciates the opportunity to provide input at this stage of the process and looks forward to continued coordination as the project progresses.
With appreciation,
The Parks & Recreation Commission
Trudi Davis, Chair
Tom Seawell, Vice Chair
Byron Anderson
Christine Gornitsky
Leesa Greenlee
Natalie Ocampo
Julie Sims
Enclosed: 2/4/2026 P&R Commission Ad hoc subcommittee meeting notes Parcel R Ad Hoc P&R Commission Subcommittee
February 4, 2026 Meeting notes
Summary
The park planning eƯort for Parcel R envisions the site as a welcoming gateway to the marina and a key public-facing open space. The approximately 1.5-acre area of higher ground—located outside the BCDC 100-foot shoreline band and areas of immediate sea level rise risk—provides a strategic opportunity for near-term activation and long-term flexibility.
The project should prioritize improved connectivity and access, including ADA-compliant and continuous pathways, with an emphasis on phased, low-cost placemaking strategies that avoid significant upfront capital investment. Amenities should be broadly appealing, adaptable, and designed to support future development or expansion as conditions and funding allow.
The park is intended to serve a diverse user base, including families and children, anglers, marina slip holders, cyclists, runners and walkers, and nearby employees, reinforcing Parcel R as a vibrant, inclusive, and functional destination.
Programming and Infrastructure Concepts for Consideration Clear and improved signage to define the park and establish a strong sense of place Historical and educational signage that reflects the site’s heritage and educates visitors Ample seating throughout the site, oriented to views and activity areas, bench berm Observation/lookout points with views to the north and south along the Bay Incorporation of a parallel Bay Trail to improve near-term connectivity and provide a longterm alternative to the existing trail impacted by sea level rise. Finish the existing path that leads to nowhere.
Attention to site cohesiveness, grading transitions, and ADA accessibility Landscaping that prioritizes native, seawater-tolerant plant species Design elements that support site stabilization and long-term resilience Durable, low-maintenance materials capable of withstanding coastal conditions Rentable picnic areas and other modest revenue-generating amenities Small-scale amphitheater/plaza (approximately 30–50 people), strategically positioned to provide both seating and site stabilization, that can serve as a gathering spot Integration of public art to enhance character and visual interest Integrated play elements that encourage informal play without requiring full playground infrastructure (ie: slide & climbing wall)
Incorporate aesthetically pleasing wind barriers that enhance comfort in exposed areas, using a “play with the wind” approach inspired by kinetic art Low-cost bike trail features to support cycling and active use Consideration of relocation or construction of public restrooms to serve site users, in the interim explore temporary restroom options
Provision of accessible utilities (water and electrical) to support future programming and special events, as well as water fountain / bottle filler Site should support proper drainage
Designated areas for food trucks to serve weekend and special event users, potentially accommodated outside Parcel R using adjacent existing hardscape areas Shade canopies may be considered a lower priority due to wind and cooler conditions Additional Context Regarding Approach and Site Constraints Additional considerations for the project include a phased implementation approach informed by consultant-provided feasibility analyses and cost estimates, recognizing that initial improvements may be delivered in stages with opportunities to pursue additional funding over time.
Regional coordination with OneShoreline and the Marina may be required, particularly where Bay Trail alignments are aƯected, and could present opportunities for partnership funding. Planning should account for the broader Sierra Point context to ensure all public land functions as a cohesive and well-integrated system.
Site constraints such as ground squirrel mitigation should be addressed early (explore adding signage about the need to mitigate), along with potential reconfiguration of adjacent roadways to improve pedestrian and bicycle access and safety, including resolving incomplete crosswalks and unsafe circulation around Parcel R. Evaluate site constraints related to existing trees.
The subcommittee agrees that a dog park is likely not needed in this space.
Consideration should also be given to updating or enhancing access to existing fitness clusters throughout the site to improve connectivity and user experience.
SIERRA POINT
PARCEL R
65% Concept Design
March 12, 2026
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 2
01 Existing Conditions
02 Program Design
03 Site Design
AGENDA
0 SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 3
Section 01
EXISTING CONDITIONS
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 4
Office Park
Parcel R!
Sierra Point Park
Sierra Point
Parkway
EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE CONTEXT
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 5
CORPORATE CAMPUS PUBLIC PARK
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 6
X
X
EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE CONSTRAINTS
Clunky Arrival
Unsung Loop
Low Points
Low Points
Broken Circulation
Strong Wind Corridor
Lack of Program
Goat Paths
Limited Planting
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 7
EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE OPPORTUNITIES
Clarify Arrival
New Experiences
See Diablo Range See Mt Diablo!
Formalize Promenade Thoughtful Planting
Protect From Wind
Public Art
See SF Skyline
Clarify Circulation
Unlock Unsung Spaces
Support Public Events
Expand Garden
0 Section 02
PROGRAM DESIGN
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 8
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 9
PROGRAM DESIGN SIZE COMPARISON
Parcel R - ~2.8 AC China Basin - 2.5 AC McLaren Park - 1.8 AC Tunnel Tops - 2.8 AC Crane Cove - 2.5 AC
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 10
PROGRAM DESIGN PREFERRED PROGRAM
• Sense of Place
• Wayfinding
• Observation Points
• Accessibility
• Native & Regional Planting
• Amphitheatre
• Picnic
• Informal Play
• Wind Protection
• Cycling Experiences
• Utility Upgrades
• Community Events
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 11
PROGRAM DESIGN PROGRAM PRECEDENTS
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 12
PROGRAM DESIGN PROGRAM PRECEDENTS
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 13
PROGRAM DESIGN PROGRAM PRECEDENTS
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 14
PROGRAM DESIGN PROGRAM PRECEDENTS
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 15
PROGRAM DESIGN PROGRAM PRECEDENTS
0 Section 01
SITE DESIGN
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 16
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 17
SITE DESIGN 65% CONCEPT PLAN
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 18
20’
22.5’’
19.5’
23.75’
24.0’
25.0’ HP 23.75’
19.0’ 18.0’
4.7%
4.8%
4.4%
4.8%
4.7%
SITE DESIGN 65% CONCEPT PLAN - ROUGH GRADING
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 19
1 1
1 1
1 1
2 2 2
2 2
2 2
4 4
4 8
8 8
8 8
5 5
5 5
5 9
6 6
10 10
3 3
7 7
7 7
SITE DESIGN 65% CONCEPT PLAN - MATERIALS
MATERIAL TYPES
PLANTING TYPES
Concrete
Asphalt
DG (Decomposed Granite)
Artificial Turf
Rip Rap
Timber Log Amphitheatre
Upland Coastal Scrub
Grasses
Coastal Scrub
Salt Marsh Species
Excluded From ROM Costing
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 20
SITE DESIGN SECTIONS
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 21
SITE DESIGN SLR SECTIONS
3.5’ SLR - 2070
7.0’ SLR - 2100
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 22
SITE DESIGN 65% CONCEPT PLAN
Picnic
Gather
Look
Event
Relax
*Lawn is presently approx. 5,250 SF, and could
accomodate ~(15) 10’x10’ pop-up tents along
its perimeter.
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 23
1 2
4 3
Flexible Synth Lawn*
Sloped Synth Lawn
Art TBD
Buffer Planting
1 2
4 3
SITE DESIGN ENLARGEMENT - GATHERING (SYNTHETIC) LAWN
Flexible Synth Lawn
Lounge/Sloped Synth Lawn
Art TBD
Buffer Planting
1 1
2 2
4 4
3 3
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 24
SITE DESIGN ENLARGEMENT - GATHERING (SYNTHETIC) LAWN
1 1
2 2
4 4
3 3
Picnic Area
Buffer Planting
Art & Play Zone*
Grass & Riprap Slopes
*Cost is Assumed to be drawn from Arts
Budget and not base project budget
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 25
SITE DESIGN ENLARGEMENT - PICNIC GROVE
Picnic Area
Buffer Planting
Art & Play Zone*
*Cost is Assumed to be drawn from Arts
Budget and not base project budget
Grass& Riprap Slopes
1 1
2 2
4 4
3 3
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 26
SITE DESIGN ENLARGEMENT - PICNIC GROVE
1 1
2 2
4 4
3 3
Amphitheatre
Gathering Space
Coastal Grasses
Viewing Edge
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 27
SITE DESIGN ENLARGEMENT - AMPHITHEATRE
Amphitheatre
Gathering Space
Coastal Grasses
Viewing Edge
1 1
2 2
4 4
3 3
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 28
SITE DESIGN ENLARGEMENT - AMPHITHEATRE
1 1
2 2
2 2
Hammock Palm Grove
Food Truck Staging
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 29
SITE DESIGN ENLARGEMENT - PALM GROVE
Hammock Palm Grove
Food Truck Staging
1 1
2 2
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 30
SITE DESIGN ENLARGEMENT - PALM GROVE
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 31
SITE DESIGN 65% CONCEPT PLAN
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 32
1 1
1 1
2 4
4 4
8 8
8 8
8 5
5 5
5 5
9 6
6 10
10 3
3 7
7 7
7 SITE DESIGN 65% CONCEPT PLAN
MATERIAL TYPES
PLANTING TYPES
Concrete
Asphalt
DG (Decomposed Granite)
Artificial Turf
Rip Rap
Timber Log Amphitheatre
Upland Coastal Scrub
Grasses
Coastal Scrub
Salt Marsh Species
Excluded From ROM Costing
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 33
‘BONUS’ / ALT. OPTIONS
Promenade Mural
Expanded Amphitheatre
Boardwalk Connector
Temp. Bike Skills/Traffic Garden
*These options are budget dependent
on both the Base Project and Public
Art Funding. A select number of options
are shown to graphically indicate
some of the experiences and elements
that could be implemented pending
costing and tbduget alignments, along
with prioritiziationof key elements for
community beneift.
*Size, Shape & Location TBD,
Shown for Reference Only
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
SITE DESIGN 65% CONCEPT PLAN - ALT OPTIONS
Public Sculpture Program
Wood Sculpture Play Element
Entry Signage
Wood Amphitheatre
Art in the Grove
Promenade Mural
1 1
1 2
2 2
4 4
4 3
3 3
5 5
5 6
6 6
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 34
SITE DESIGN 65% CONCEPT PLAN - ART OPTIONS
SIERRA POINT - PARCEL R - 65% CONCEPT DESIGN 35
SITE DESIGN 65% CONCEPT PLAN - ROUNDABOUT IMPACT
Reduce
Reduce
Reroute