Brisbane City Council
May 7, 2026

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 21

7. Significant Hazard Past Events
A complete risk assessment, including past incidents, for each identified hazard of concern, can be found in Volume 1 of this Plan. A summary of past events is provided under each hazard profile and includes a chronology of events that have affected the County and its municipalities. Table 14 provides information on significant hazard events that uniquely impacted the City of Brisbane.

Table 14. Significant Past Events
Date
Event Type (include
Disaster Declaration, if
applicable)
Description of Event and Impacts
July 2, 2024 Wildfire Grass Fire at San Bruno Mountain
December 2022
- January 2023
Landslide at Firth Canyon
(DR-4683-CA)
Landslide as a result of atmospheric rivers and
winter storms
December
2022- January
2023
Landslide at Buckeye
Canyon (DR-4683-CA)
Landslide as a result of atmospheric rivers and
winter storms
December
2022- January
2023
Severe Flooding (DR4683-CA) Severe flooding as a result of atmospheric rivers June 3, 2022 Wildfire Grass Fire at San Bruno Mountain
April 1, 2017 Severe Winter Storms Severe flooding
February 6,
2015 Severe Winter Storms Severe flooding
December 2015 Severe Winter Storms Severe flooding
February 27,
2009 Drought Drought
Spring 2006 Severe Storms (DR 1646) Severe flooding
December
2005-January
2006
Severe Storms (DR 1628) Severe flooding
Summer 2002 Wildfire Wildfire at San Bruno Mountain
February 2,
1998 Severe Storms (DR 1203) El Nino
October 17,
1989 Earthquake (845-DR-CA) Loma Prieta Earthquake
January 1982 Severe Storms (651-DRCA) Severe flooding

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 22
Winter 1980 Landslide Landslide (12 homes damaged)
Fall 1962 Severe Storms Severe flooding
• This section is meant to highlight significant past events that have uniquely impacted the jurisdictions. A brief description of the event and its impacts on the jurisdiction should be outlined in the table.
• If the jurisdiction determines that no significant events should be highlighted in their Annex, please delete the table and the last sentence of the paragraph.

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 23

8. Hazard Vulnerability and Impact Assessment
Exposure and vulnerability to certain hazards affect the entire County, and others are geographically defined. Although the entire County may be vulnerable to these hazards, their impacts may vary depending on existing community conditions (e.g., underserved populations or those with access and functional needs may be more susceptible under certain conditions).

The Local Planning Team identified unique vulnerabilities and impacts to the following natural hazards, based on the hazards profiled in Volume 1:
• Flood (riverine flooding, urban/flash flooding, coastal flooding) • Landslide
• Sea Level Rise
• Wildfire
It was determined that the planning area did not have unique vulnerabilities or impacts from the following natural hazards; rather, its vulnerabilities and impacts are consistent with those experienced throughout the County:
• Dam Failure
• Drought
• Earthquake
• Severe Weather (heavy rainfall, severe thunderstorms, strong winds, tornadoes, heat wave/extreme heat, fog)
• Tsunami
Table 15 outlines the unique vulnerabilities and impacts for the City of Brisbane and addresses only the hazards relevant to the jurisdiction.

Table 15. Hazard Vulnerability and Impact Assessment
Hazard Vulnerabilities and Impacts
Dam Failure
The Local Planning Team determined that the City does not have unique vulnerabilities or impacts from dam failure; rather, the jurisdiction’s vulnerabilities and impacts are consistent with those experienced throughout the County.

Drought
The Local Planning Team determined that the City does not have unique vulnerabilities or impacts from drought; rather, the jurisdiction’s vulnerabilities and impacts are consistent with those experienced throughout the County.

Earthquake
The Local Planning Team determined that the City does not have unique vulnerabilities or impacts from earthquakes; rather, the jurisdiction’s vulnerabilities and impacts are consistent with those experienced throughout the County.

Flood (riverine
flooding,
urban/flash
flooding, coastal
flooding)
The City has a publicly owned and operated Brisbane Marina, which is susceptible to coastal flooding. The City also has the Brisbane Lagoon, which serves as the main point of stormwater drainage for inland areas and is at risk of flooding during heavy rainfall events. Both the Brisbane Lagoon and the Brisbane Shoreline are susceptible to King Tide

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 24
events. FEMA and the Department of Water Resources mapped flood zones that occur in various parts of the City, including near the City’s major commercial area and along Bayshore Boulevard. The mapped 100-year floodplain in Brisbane includes Valley Drive and surrounding properties; the Visitacion Creek Marsh and surrounding areas near Main Street; several Baylands industrial properties along Bayshore Boulevard; and the wetlands at the southern end of the Brisbane Lagoon. A large section of the Baylands west of the Caltrain tracks is in the mapped 500-year floodplain. Flooding can lead to long-term public health problems if mold and mildew grow in buildings, displace residents if homes are destroyed or become uninhabitable, and increase economic burdens, such as rising home insurance costs.

Floods can also contribute to other natural hazards, especially landslides.

Landslide
The highest landslide risk in Brisbane is around the southern end of Bayshore Boulevard and where Sierra Point Parkway crosses under US Highway 101. However, several areas of the community face a lower but still elevated risk of landslides, including the residential neighborhoods in the hills around Downtown and the Northeast Ridge neighborhoods. In 2023, Brisbane experienced landslides at Firth Canyon and Buckeye Canyon as a result of severe storms and an atmospheric river event. Although only partially in Brisbane, most of San Bruno Mountain is landslide-prone, and landslides in the Unincorporated County area could affect Brisbane itself.

Sea Level Rise
The risk of sea level rise in Brisbane is mostly associated with temporary flooding. Even 6.5 feet of sea level rise is not likely to cause permanent inundation, except around the US Highway 101 on- and offramps at the end of Harney Way. However, by 2100, a 20-year storm could cause temporary sea level rise at properties east of Bayshore Boulevard immediately adjacent to the Brisbane Lagoon, areas along the shore of Sierra Point Parkway, and overtop sections of US Highway 101. Brisbane is working through various adaptation and feasibility studies to mitigate against sea level rise at the Brisbane Lagoon. Along the Brisbane Marina shoreline, Brisbane is beginning Regional Shoreline Adaptation Plan work. Another consequence of sea level rise is the infiltration of dense, saline water into soils near shorelines. These waters can push fresh groundwater upwards, raising the water table.

Rising groundwater can infiltrate storm drains, destabilize and corrode buried infrastructure, spread soil or groundwater contamination, undermine building foundations, and increase liquefaction hazards.

Groundwater is expected to rise at the same rate as sea level rise in Brisbane, causing it to emerge at the surface in low-lying areas.

Severe Weather
(heavy rainfall,
severe
thunderstorms,
strong winds,
tornadoes, heat
The Local Planning Team determined that the City does not have unique vulnerabilities or impacts from severe weather; rather, the jurisdiction’s vulnerabilities and impacts are consistent with those experienced throughout the County.

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 25
wave/extreme
heat, fog)
Tsunami
The Local Planning Team determined that the City does not have unique vulnerabilities or impacts from tsunamis; rather, the jurisdiction’s vulnerabilities and impacts are consistent with those experienced throughout the County.

Wildfire
Wildfires have periodically occurred in the Brisbane area, with the most recent major event occurring in July 2024. The potential impact of wildland fires on Brisbane’s urban area is an ongoing concern. Most wildfire hazards are associated with proximity to the San Bruno Mountain State and County Park and the 145-acre Guadalupe Valley Quarry area. Parts of Brisbane are designated a Moderate fire hazard severity zone, including the Northeast Ridge neighborhood, most of the Brisbane Acres area, and parts of Central Brisbane and Crocker Park.

Unincorporated San Bruno Mountain is also an area of Moderate fire hazard severity zone.

The City evaluated whether vulnerability in hazard-prone areas had increased, decreased, or remained the same for each natural hazard identified in this LHMP. Climate change, changes in population, infrastructure expansion, and economic shifts that can affect vulnerability were considered. For example, if planned development is in an identified hazard area or is not built to the updated building codes, it may increase the community’s vulnerability to future hazards and disasters.

On the other hand, if development occurred with mitigation practices in place, the vulnerability may have remained the same or decreased. Additionally, shifting demographics (e.g., underserved population) were taken into consideration.

Table 16 outlines whether climate change has increased or decreased the City's vulnerability (i.e., exposure) and impact to each natural hazard over the past five (5) years, and the effect of climate change on the future probability of occurrence and impacts from each natural hazard.

Table 16. Climate Change: Current and Future Vulnerability and Impact Hazard Vulnerability and Impact
Current Vulnerability and Impact
Dam Failure Not Applicable
Drought Remained the Same
Earthquake Remained the Same
Flood (riverine flooding, urban/flash flooding, coastal flooding) Increased Landslide Increased
Sea Level Rise Remained the Same
Severe Weather (heavy rainfall, severe thunderstorms, strong winds, tornadoes, heat wave/extreme heat, fog) Increased

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 26
Tsunami Remained the Same
Wildfire Remained the Same
Future Vulnerability and Impact
Dam Failure Not Applicable
Drought No Change Anticipated
Earthquake No Change Anticipated
Flood (riverine flooding, urban/flash flooding, coastal flooding) Increase Landslide Increase
Sea Level Rise Increase
Severe Weather (heavy rainfall, severe thunderstorms, strong winds, tornadoes, heat wave/extreme heat, fog) Increase Tsunami No Change Anticipated
Wildfire Increase
Table 17 outlines whether changes in population within the City over the past five (5) years have increased or decreased the vulnerability (i.e., exposure) and impact to these natural hazards, and the anticipated effects changes in population may have on the future probability of occurrence and impacts from these natural hazards.

Table 17. Changes in Population: Current and Future Vulnerability and Impact Hazard Vulnerability and Impact
Current Vulnerability and Impact
Dam Failure Not Applicable
Drought Remained the Same
Earthquake Remained the Same
Flood (riverine flooding, urban/flash flooding, coastal flooding) Increased Landslide Remained the Same
Sea Level Rise Remained the Same
Severe Weather (heavy rainfall, severe thunderstorms, strong winds, tornadoes, heat wave/extreme heat, fog) Increased Tsunami Remained the Same
Wildfire Remained the Same
Future Vulnerability and Impact

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 27
Dam Failure Not Applicable
Drought No Change Anticipated
Earthquake Increase
Flood (riverine flooding, urban/flash flooding, coastal flooding) Increase Landslide No Change Anticipated
Sea Level Rise Increase
Severe Weather (heavy rainfall, severe thunderstorms, strong winds, tornadoes, heat wave/extreme heat, fog) Increase Tsunami No Change Anticipated
Wildfire No Change Anticipated
Table 18 outlines whether development over the past five (5) years has increased or decreased the City's vulnerability (i.e., exposure) and impact to these natural hazards, and the anticipated effects changes in development may have on the future probability of occurrence and impacts from these natural hazards.

Table 18. Changes in Development: Current and Future Vulnerability and Impact Hazard Vulnerability and Impact
Current Vulnerability and Impact
Dam Failure Not Applicable
Drought Remained the Same
Earthquake Remained the Same
Flood (riverine flooding, urban/flash flooding, coastal flooding) Increased Landslide Remained the Same
Sea Level Rise Remained the Same
Severe Weather (heavy rainfall, severe thunderstorms, strong winds, tornadoes, heat wave/extreme heat, fog) Remained the Same Tsunami Remained the Same
Wildfire Remained the Same
Future Vulnerability and Impact
Dam Failure Not Applicable

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 28
Drought No Change Anticipated
Earthquake No Change Anticipated
Flood (riverine flooding, urban/flash flooding, coastal flooding) Increase Landslide Increase
Sea Level Rise Increase
Severe Weather (heavy rainfall, severe thunderstorms, strong winds, tornadoes, heat wave/extreme heat, fog) No Change Anticipated Tsunami No Change Anticipated
Wildfire No Change Anticipated

8.1 Future Major Assets
Community assets should include anything that is important to a community’s character and function.

Assets include people (i.e., underserved population); structures (i.e., new and existing buildings); community lifelines and other critical facilities; natural, historic, and cultural resources; and the economy and other activities that have value to the community. Any new assets (e.g., new construction in hazard-prone areas) will be built to comply with the latest building codes and standards and will be mitigated to protect them from identified and anticipated hazards, especially those expected to increase due to climate change.

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 29

9. Hazard Risk Ranking
Table 19 presents the local hazard ranking for the City of Brisbane of all hazards of concern listed in Volume 1 of this Plan. This ranking summarizes how hazards vary for this jurisdiction. As thoroughly described in Volume 1 of this Plan, 14 factors were evaluated to provide an informed and comprehensive analysis and ranking of the hazards included in this LHMP. • Probability (likelihood of annual occurrence)
• Extent of the hazard, including catastrophic potential • Vulnerability (i.e., exposure) of the population, property (including critical infrastructure), and changes in the development (over the past five (5) years) • Impacts on population and life safety, underserved population, property (including critical infrastructure), the economy, the environment, continuity of operations/delivery of services, future development, and climate change
The scores for extent, vulnerability, and impact were weighted and combined to produce a consequence score. This consequence score was then multiplied by the probability score to calculate the total risk score for each hazard. At the fundamental level, the consequence is an assessment of the potential impact(s) if the hazards incident were to occur. In this assessment, the consequence score (i.e., the consequence of an event) will be independent of the extent, vulnerability, and impacts.

The probability of the hazards is not included in assessing the consequence because, without an event, there is no consequence or impact. For further details on how the probability, extent, vulnerability, and impact factors in Table 19 were calculated, please refer to Section # in Volume 1 of this Plan.

It is important to note that the sub-hazards for severe weather (i.e., heavy rainfall, severe thunderstorms, strong winds, tornadoes, heat wave/extreme heat, and fog) and flood (i.e., riverine flooding, urban/flash flooding, coastal flooding) were individually ranked in the hazard risk ranking; however, severe weather and flood are each considered as the main hazard throughout this Annex and Volume 1.

Table 19. City of Brisbane Hazard Risk Ranking
Hazard Event Probability
Factor
Sum of
Weighted
Extent
Factors
Sum of
Weighted
Vulnerability
Factors
Sum of
Weighted
Impact
Factors
Consequence
Score
Total Risk
Score
(Probability x
Consequence)
Urban/Flash
Flooding
(Flood)
3 18 14 32 64 89
Heavy Rainfall
(Severe
Weather)
3 12 13 23 48 67
Earthquake 2 18 14 35 67 62

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 30
Wildfire 2 18 12 34 64 59
Strong Winds
(Severe
Weather)
3 6 13 22 41 57
Sea Level
Rise 3 6 8 26 40 56
Landslide 2 9 9 30 48 44
Coastal
Flooding
(Flood)
2 12 9 26 47 44
Heat
Wave/Extreme
Heat
(Severe
Weather)
3 6 10 15 31 43
Severe
Thunderstorm
(Severe
Weather)
2 9 13 21 43 40
Riverine
Flooding
(Flood)
2 9 6 28 43 40
Drought 2 6 11 22 39 36
Tornado
(Severe
Weather)
1 6 13 13 32 15
Fog
(Severe
Weather)
1 6 9 11 26 12
Tsunami 1 6 5 12 23 11
Dam Failure 0 0 0 0 0 0
Consequence: Sum of all weighted factors.

Extent: Sum of the weighted Extent factors.

Vulnerability: Sum of the
weighted Vulnerability factors.

Impact: Sum of the weighted Impact factors.

Total Risk Score* = Probability x Consequence
* Normalized to 100

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 31
Classification Probability
Factor Extent Vulnerability Impact ConsequenceScore
Total
Risk
Score
Low (L) 1 0 - 6 0 - 4 0 - 12 0 - 24 0 - 32
Medium (M) 2 7 - 12 5 - 10 13 - 26 25 - 48 33 - 66
High (H) 3 13 - 18 11 - 15 27 - 39 49 - 72 67 -100
The legend—specifically the assignment of low, medium, and high—provides an additional means to qualitatively assess the probability factor, sum of weighted factors, and the total risk scores for each hazard. The Consequence Score represents the sum of the Extent, Vulnerability, and Impact Factors. The Total Risk Score is a measure of Probability and Consequence.

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 32

10. Mitigation Actions
This section includes the mitigation actions developed to address the risks and vulnerabilities to the hazards identified in this Plan. This Plan serves only to recommend mitigation measures based on the potential for risk reduction and available funding. Implementation of mitigation actions is dependent on risk reduction priorities, feasibility, and available funding. It is also dependent on the cooperation and support of the jurisdiction and/or department responsible for each action item.

Additionally, all mitigation actions identified in the 2021 update or before were updated accordingly.

Any new mitigation actions are listed as New (under Project Status).

The City of Brisbane agreed to 18 mitigation actions that apply to the jurisdiction’s properties for which it has jurisdictional responsibility and authority. A summary of the City’s mitigation actions status is listed in Table 20.

Note: The mitigation actions outlined in this Plan are designed only to address those natural hazards that received a risk ranking of medium or high during the hazard risk assessment (Table 19). Hazards that ranked low (dam failure and tsunami) may not have specific mitigation actions detailed in this document.

Table 20. City of Brisbane Mitigation Actions Summary
Status Mitigation Action Total
Continuing 5
In Progress 7
Not Yet Started 4
New 1
Completed 1
No Longer Needed 0
TOTAL 18
Hazard Actions Hazard Actions
Dam Failure n/a Sea Level Rise 12
Drought 9
Severe Weather (heavy rainfall,
severe thunderstorms, strong
winds, tornadoes, heat
wave/extreme heat, fog)
18 Earthquake 13 Tsunami 12
Flood (riverine flooding,
urban/flash flooding, coastal
flooding)
17 Wildfire 13

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 33
Landslide 15
A detailed explanation of the Mitigation Strategy can be found in Volume 1.

Mitigation Action
Where appropriate, support retrofitting, purchasing, or relocating structures located in high-hazard areas, prioritizing those that have experienced repetitive losses and/or are in high- or medium-risk hazard areas.

Action Number BRS-1
Goal(s)
Addressed 1, 3, 4 Prioritization Score 29/40
Year Added to
the Plan 2016 Timeline (estimated) Ongoing Implementation Priority Medium Hazard(s)
Mitigated
Earthquake, Flood, Landslide, Sea Level Rise, Severe Weather, Tsunami, Wildfire
Project Status Continuing
If No
Longer
Needed,
provide
reason.
n/a
Benefits (Loss
Avoided) High
Lead Agency /
Organization City of Brisbane Community Development Department (Planning Division) Supporting
Agency /
Organization (If
applicable)
n/a
Additional
Participating
Jurisdictions (If
Applicable)
n/a
Estimated Cost High
Potential
Funding
Source
General Fund (Staff Time), HMGP, FMA,
BRIC
Additional Details
(optional)

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 34
Mitigation Action
Strengthen the long-term resilience of the Brisbane Baylands’ development to sea level rise and extreme storms, and provide environmental, recreational, and community/connectivity enhancements where possible.

Action Number BRS-2
Goal(s)
Addressed 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Prioritization Score 32/40
Year Added to the
Plan 2021 Timeline (estimated)
2030-2031 Implementation
Priority High
Hazard(s)
Mitigated
Drought, Earthquake, Flood, Landslide, Sea Level Rise, Severe Weather, Tsunami, Wildfire
Project Status In Progress
If No
Longer
Needed,
provide
reason.
n/a
Benefits (Loss
Avoided) High
Lead Agency /
Organization
City of Brisbane Community Development Department (Planning Division), City of Brisbane Public Works Department
Supporting
Agency /
Organization (If
applicable)
n/a
Additional
Participating
Jurisdictions (If
Applicable)
n/a
Estimated Cost High
Potential
Funding
Source
General Fund (Staff Time), HMGP, FMA,
BRIC, Private Developer, Caltrans funds,
California Proposition 68, San Francisco
Bay Restoration Authority Measure AA
Additional Details
(optional)

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 35
Mitigation Action
Develop and implement a program to capture perishable data after significant incidents (e.g., high-water marks, preliminary damage estimates, damage photos) in a database to support future mitigation efforts, including implementing and enhancing hazard mitigation, climate action, and other plans. Furthermore, develop a cost-tracking system to ensure maximum reimbursement after a major disaster.

Action Number BRS-3
Goal(s)
Addressed 1, 3, 5 Prioritization Score 30/40
Year Added to the
Plan 2016 Timeline (estimated) 2030-2031 Implementation Priority High Hazard(s)
Mitigated
Drought, Earthquake, Flood, Landslide, Sea Level Rise, Severe Weather, Tsunami, Wildfire
Project Status In Progress
If No
Longer
Needed,
provide
reason.
n/a
Benefits (Loss
Avoided) High
Lead Agency /
Organization City Manager’s Office (Emergency Services Division) Supporting
Agency /
Organization (If
applicable)
n/a
Additional
Participating
Jurisdictions (If
Applicable)
n/a
Estimated Cost Medium
Potential
Funding
Source
General Fund (Staff Time)
Additional Details
(optional)

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 36
Mitigation Action
Support countywide hazard mitigation actions and initiatives identified in the San Mateo County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, specifically those taking place within the City.

Action Number BRS-4
Goal(s)
Addressed 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Prioritization Score 27/40
Year Added to
the Plan 2016 Timeline (estimated) Ongoing Implementation Priority Medium Hazard(s)
Mitigated
Drought, Earthquake, Flood, Landslide, Sea Level Rise, Severe Weather, Tsunami, Wildfire
Project Status Continuing
If No
Longer
Needed,
provide
reason.
n/a
Benefits (Loss
Avoided) Medium
Lead Agency /
Organization City Manager’s Office (Division of Emergency Services) Supporting
Agency /
Organization (If
applicable)
n/a
Additional
Participating
Jurisdictions (If
Applicable)
n/a
Estimated Cost Medium
Potential
Funding
Source
General Fund (Staff Time)
Additional
Details (optional)

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 37
Mitigation Action
Actively participate in the Hazard Mitigation Plan maintenance protocols outlined in Volume 1 of the San Mateo County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.

Action Number BRS-5
Goal(s)
Addressed 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Prioritization Score 27/40
Year Added to
the Plan 2016 Timeline (estimated) Ongoing Implementation Priority Medium Hazard(s)
Mitigated
Drought, Earthquake, Flood, Landslide, Sea Level Rise, Severe Weather, Tsunami, Wildfire
Project Status Continuing
If No
Longer
Needed,
provide
reason.
n/a
Benefits (Loss
Avoided) Medium
Lead Agency /
Organization City Manager’s Office (Emergency Services Division) Supporting
Agency /
Organization (If
applicable)
n/a
Additional
Participating
Jurisdictions (If
Applicable)
n/a
Estimated Cost Medium
Potential
Funding
Source
General Fund (Staff Time)
Additional
Details (optional)

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 38
Mitigation Action
Continue to keep good standing and compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) by implementing floodplain management programs that, at a minimum, meet NFIP requirements. These include, but are not limited to, enforcing the City’s flood damage prevention ordinance, participating in floodplain identification and mapping updates, and providing public assistance/information on floodplain requirements and impacts.

Action Number BRS-6
Goal(s)
Addressed 1, 2, 3, 5 Prioritization Score 28/40
Year Added to the
Plan 2016 Timeline (estimated) Ongoing Implementation Priority Medium Hazard(s)
Mitigated Flood, Severe Weather
Project Status Continuing
If No
Longer
Needed,
provide
reason.
n/a
Benefits (Loss
Avoided) Medium
Lead Agency /
Organization City of Brisbane Public Works Department
Supporting
Agency /
Organization (If
applicable)
n/a
Additional
Participating
Jurisdictions (If
Applicable)
n/a
Estimated Cost Low
Potential
Funding
Source
General Fund (Staff Time)
Additional Details
(optional)

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 39
Mitigation Action
Update and strengthen local building codes by adopting the latest International Building Code (IBC) and state revisions to ensure that all public and private development (including new development and redevelopment) meets the highest resilience and safety requirements, helping reduce long-term vulnerabilities in the community.

Action Number BRS-7
Goal(s)
Addressed 1, 3, 4 Prioritization Score 27/40
Year Added to
the Plan 2016 Timeline (estimated) Ongoing Implementation Priority Medium Hazard(s)
Mitigated Earthquake, Flood, Landslide, Severe Weather, Wildfire Project Status Continuing
If No
Longer
Needed,
provide
reason.
n/a
Benefits (Loss
Avoided) Medium
Lead Agency /
Organization City of Brisbane Community Development Department (Planning Division) Supporting
Agency /
Organization (If
applicable)
City Manager’s Office (Sustainability Division); North County Fire Authority Additional
Participating
Jurisdictions (If
Applicable)
n/a
Estimated Cost Low
Potential
Funding
Source
General Fund (Staff Time)
Additional Details
(optional)

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 40
Mitigation Action
Develop and implement a Post-Disaster Recovery Plan and a Debris Management Plan with the intention of institutionalizing post-disaster resilience, mitigating economic and environmental impacts.

Action Number BRS-8
Goal(s)
Addressed 1, 4, 5 Prioritization Score 27/40
Year Added to
the Plan 2016 Timeline (estimated) 2030-2031
Implementation
Priority Medium
Hazard(s)
Mitigated
Drought, Earthquake, Flood, Landslide, Sea Level Rise, Severe Weather, Tsunami, Wildfire
Project Status In Progress
If No
Longer
Needed,
provide
reason.
n/a
Benefits (Loss
Avoided) Medium
Lead Agency /
Organization
City Manager’s Office (Emergency Services Division), City of Brisbane Public Works Department
Supporting
Agency /
Organization (If
applicable)
n/a
Additional
Participating
Jurisdictions (If
Applicable)
n/a
Estimated Cost Low
Potential
Funding
Source
General Fund (Staff Time)
Additional Details
(optional)

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 41
Mitigation Action
Acquire a standby emergency backup generator or microgrid for City Hall, which serves as the City’s Emergency Operations Center backup location, to establish permanent power redundancy and ensure continuous operation and uninterrupted service delivery during and after a major disaster.

Action Number BRS-9
Goal(s)
Addressed 1, 3, 5 Prioritization Score 34/40
Year Added to
the Plan 2016 Timeline (estimated)
3-6 months Implementation
Priority High
Hazard(s)
Mitigated Earthquake, Flood, Landslide, Severe Weather, Wildfire Project Status In Progress
If No
Longer
Needed,
provide
reason.
n/a
Benefits (Loss
Avoided) High
Lead Agency /
Organization City Manager’s Office (Emergency Services Division) Supporting
Agency /
Organization (If
applicable)
City Manager’s Office (Sustainability Division)
Additional
Participating
Jurisdictions (If
Applicable)
n/a
Estimated Cost Medium
Potential
Funding
Source
General Fund (Staff Time), HMGP, CalOES
grants
Additional Details
(optional)

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 42
Mitigation Action
Establish a permanent local fuel supply and delivery system capable of supporting three (3) to five (5) days of fuel needs for emergency responders and standby generators to mitigate the risk of critical infrastructure failure and ensure the continuous operation of emergency responders and water and sewer facilities during and after major disasters.

Action Number BRS-10 Goal(s)
Addressed 4
Prioritization
Score 18/40
Year Added to the
Plan 2016 Timeline (estimated) 2027-2031
Implementation
Priority Low
Hazard(s)
Mitigated Earthquake, Flood, Landslide, Severe Weather, Tsunami, Wildfire Project Status Not Yet Started
If No
Longer
Needed,
provide
reason.
n/a
Benefits (Loss
Avoided) Medium
Lead Agency /
Organization City of Brisbane Public Works Department
Supporting
Agency /
Organization (If
applicable)
n/a
Additional
Participating
Jurisdictions (If
Applicable)
n/a
Estimated Cost High
Potential
Funding
Source
General Fund (Staff Time), HMGP, CalOES
grants
Additional Details
(optional)

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 43
Mitigation Action
Design and build a new ingress/egress intersection at Glen Park Way/Humboldt Road to mitigate the risk of isolation and structural loss, and to provide emergency responders with access to the southern portion of the community, which is adjacent to the wildland urban interface (WUI).

Action Number BRS-11 Goal(s)
Addressed 1
Prioritization
Score 16/40
Year Added to the
Plan 2016 Timeline (estimated) 2030-2031 Implementation Priority Low Hazard(s)
Mitigated Earthquake, Landslide, Severe Weather, Wildfire Project Status Not Yet Started
If No
Longer
Needed,
provide
reason.
n/a
Benefits (Loss
Avoided) Medium
Lead Agency /
Organization City of Brisbane Department of Public Works Supporting
Agency /
Organization (If
applicable)
City Manager’s Office (Emergency Services Division)
Additional
Participating
Jurisdictions (If
Applicable)
n/a
Estimated Cost High
Potential
Funding
Source
General Fund (Staff Time), HMGP, CalOES
funds
Additional Details
(optional)

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 44
Mitigation Action
Enhance the City’s response and recovery capabilities through the San Mateo Operational Area Emergency Services Organization, the San Mateo Emergency Managers Association, and the San Mateo County Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement to ensure continuity of services during major disasters.

Action Number BRS-12 Goal(s)
Addressed 1, 3, 4 Prioritization Score 31/40
Year Added to the
Plan 2016 Timeline (estimated) Ongoing Implementation Priority High Hazard(s)
Mitigated
Drought, Earthquake, Flood, Landslide, Sea Level Rise, Severe Weather, Tsunami, Wildfire
Project Status Continuing
If No
Longer
Needed,
provide
reason.
n/a
Benefits (Loss
Avoided) High
Lead Agency /
Organization City Manager’s Office (Emergency Services Division) Supporting
Agency /
Organization (If
applicable)
n/a
Additional
Participating
Jurisdictions (If
Applicable)
n/a
Estimated Cost Low
Potential
Funding
Source
General Fund (Staff Time)
Additional Details
(optional)

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 45
Mitigation Action
Institutionalize a comprehensive training program for City personnel to ensure the specialized technical capacity required to implement long-term risk reduction, hazard-specific safety protocols, and disaster response.

Action Number BRS-13 Goal(s)
Addressed 1, 5 Prioritization Score 31/40
Year Added to
the Plan 2016 Timeline (estimated)
3 to 6
Months
Implementation
Priority Medium
Hazard(s)
Mitigated
Drought, Earthquake, Flood, Landslide, Sea Level Rise, Severe Weather, Tsunami, Wildfire
Project Status In Progress
If No
Longer
Needed,
provide
reason.
n/a
Benefits (Loss
Avoided) High
Lead Agency /
Organization City Manager’s Office (Emergency Services Division) Supporting
Agency /
Organization (If
applicable)
n/a
Additional
Participating
Jurisdictions (If
Applicable)
n/a
Estimated Cost Low
Potential
Funding
Source
General Fund (Staff Time)
Additional Details
(optional)

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 46
Mitigation Action
Participate in the Sea Change San Mateo County initiative to develop an understanding of future sea level rise vulnerabilities and help identify mitigation efforts within the City to increase adaptive capacity to climate change and sea level rise.

Action Number BRS-14 Goal(s)
Addressed 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Prioritization Score 33/40
Year Added to the
Plan 2016 Timeline (estimated) Complete Implementation Priority High Hazard(s)
Mitigated Flood, Sea Level Rise, Severe Weather
Project Status Completed
If No
Longer
Needed,
provide
reason.

City successfully participated
in Sea Change San Mateo
County and is currently
undergoing further sea level
rise adaptation planning
efforts with One Shoreline.

Benefits (Loss
Avoided) Medium
Lead Agency /
Organization
City of Brisbane Public Works Department; City of Brisbane City Manager’s Office (Sustainability Division)
Supporting
Agency /
Organization (If
applicable)
n/a
Additional
Participating
Jurisdictions (If
Applicable)
n/a
Estimated Cost High
Potential
Funding
Source
General Fund (Staff Time)
Additional Details
(optional)

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 47
Mitigation Action
Identify, pursue, and support San Mateo County Flood and Sea Level Rise Resiliency District (One Shoreline) strategies and infrastructure projects that enhance resilience to natural disasters and, where feasible, incorporate green design elements into hazard mitigation projects, including assets identified in the Caltrans District 4 Adaptation Priorities Report.

Action Number BRS-15 Goal(s)
Addressed 1, 3, 5 Prioritization Score 33/40
Year Added to the
Plan 2021 Timeline (estimated) Ongoing Implementation Priority High Hazard(s)
Mitigated Drought, Flood, Landslide, Severe Weather, Tsunami Project Status In Progress
If No
Longer
Needed,
provide
reason.
n/a
Benefits (Loss
Avoided) Medium
Lead Agency /
Organization City of Brisbane City Manager’s Office (Emergency Services Division) Supporting
Agency /
Organization (If
applicable)
San Mateo County Flood and Sea Level Rise Resiliency District (OneShoreline); City of Brisbane Department of Public Works Additional
Participating
Jurisdictions (If
Applicable)
n/a
Estimated Cost High
Potential
Funding
Source
General Fund (Staff Time)
Additional Details
(optional)

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 48
Mitigation Action
Integrate the San Mateo County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan into other City plans, ordinances, and programs that govern land use decisions in the community, including, but not limited to, the General Plan (and its elements, as appropriate).

Action Number BRS-16 Goal(s)
Addressed 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Prioritization Score 36/40
Year Added to the
Plan 2021 Timeline (estimated) Ongoing Implementation Priority High Hazard(s)
Mitigated
Drought, Earthquake, Flood, Landslide, Sea Level Rise, Severe Weather, Tsunami, Wildfire
Project Status Continuing
If No
Longer
Needed,
provide
reason.
n/a
Benefits (Loss
Avoided) Medium
Lead Agency /
Organization City of Brisbane Community Development Department (Planning Division) Supporting
Agency /
Organization (If
applicable)
n/a
Additional
Participating
Jurisdictions (If
Applicable)
n/a
Estimated Cost Low
Potential
Funding
Source
General Fund (Staff Time)
Additional Details
(optional)

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 49
Mitigation Action
Mandate integration of FEMA 100-year tide levels, projected sea level rise, and climate-driven extreme storm data into land use planning and shoreline development.

Action Number BRS-17 Goal(s)
Addressed 1, 3, 4, 5 Prioritization Score 36/40
Year Added to
the Plan 2021 Timeline (estimated)
Ongoing Implementation
Priority Medium
Hazard(s)
Mitigated Flood, Landslide, Sea Level Rise, Severe Weather Project Status Continuing
If No
Longer
Needed,
provide
reason.
n/a
Benefits (Loss
Avoided) Medium
Lead Agency /
Organization City of Brisbane Community Development Department (Planning Division) Supporting
Agency /
Organization (If
applicable)
n/a
Additional
Participating
Jurisdictions (If
Applicable)
n/a
Estimated Cost Low
Potential
Funding
Source
General Fund (Staff Time)
Additional Details
(optional)

City of Brisbane — 2026 LHMP Jurisdictional Annex
Brisbane Jurisdictional Annex | 2026 | Page 50
Mitigation Action
Evaluate the potential impacts of sea level rise on the Brisbane Lagoon through a planning and vulnerability assessment. Using regional sea level rise projections and hydrologic modeling, the City will identify areas that may become vulnerable to future tidal flooding and explore potential adaptation strategies, such as shoreline protection, infrastructure improvements, and other resilience measures. This effort is intended to inform long-term planning and help position the City to pursue funding and coordinated regional solutions as sea level rise progresses.

Action Number BRS-18 Goal(s)
Addressed 1, 3 Prioritization Score 33/40
Year Added to the
Plan 2026 Timeline (estimated) 2027-2028 Implementation Priority High Hazard(s)
Mitigated Flood, Sea Level Rise, Severe Weather, Tsunami Project Status New
If No
Longer
Needed,
provide
reason.
n/a
Benefits (Loss
Avoided) Medium
Lead Agency /
Organization City of Brisbane Public Works Department
Supporting
Agency /
Organization (If
applicable)
Caltrans
Additional
Participating
Jurisdictions (If
Applicable)
Bay Conservation and Development Commission
Estimated Cost High
Potential
Funding
Source
General Fund (Staff Time), Sustainable
Transportation Planning Grant (with City
match)
Additional Details
(optional)

City Council Staff Report
Meeting Date: May 7, 2026
From: Jeremy Dennis, City Manager
Subject: Discuss Public Art Advisory Committee Membership Composition and Consider Adopting a Resolution to
Amend the Public Art Implementation Guidelines
Recommendation
Staff recommend that the City Council receive an update on recruitment efforts for the Public Art Advisory Committee and adopt a resolution amending the Public Art Implementation Guidelines.

Background
The City Council adopted Brisbane's Art in Public Places Program Ordinance ("Public Art Ordinance") in 2014 with the objectives of fostering public appreciation for art, enhancing quality of life, andreinforcing Brisbane's distinctive identity within the Bay Area.

Subsequently, the City Council enacted the Public Art Implementation Guidelines (Attachment 1) to promote community participation, maintain a diverse collection, cultivate a sense of place, and facilitate artist engagement. These Guidelines outline comprehensive policies and procedures governing the acquisition of public art and the management of related funding contributions. The Guidelines were most recently amended on September 18, 2025 to ensure consistency with the Public Art Master Plan. As part of this amendment, the structure of the Public Art Advisory Committee (PAAC) was adjusted by eliminating the appointment of two Parks and Recreation Commissioners and two Councilmembers and increasing the number of community members from three to seven. (Attachment 2) Discussion
As a result of the changes made to the Public Art Implementation Guidelines, the City Council held a special city council meeting on April 21, 2026 to recruit four community members to the PAAC. As a result of this recruitment, two community members were offered a committee seat. Subsequently, one of the two appointees declined the appointment, leaving the PAAC with just one new appointee. Public Art Implementation guidelines state that PAAC be made up of seven members. However, other committees such as the Complete Streets Safety Committee (CSSC) and the Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Accountability (IDEA) Committee have language in their bylaws indicating a composition of "five to seven members".

If Council wishes to align with CSSC and IDEA Committee membership bylaws, staff propose amending the Public Art Implementation Guidelines to reflect a range of five to seven committee members appointed by Council. Amended implementation guidelines and an accompanying resolution are attached for consideration.

Currently, the PAAC has four vacancies. If membership remains unchanged, the City Clerk will proceed with recruitment for these four positions. Alternatively, if Council reduces PAAC membership to five seats, the City Clerk will recruit for the single remaining vacancy.

Fiscal Impact

There is no known fiscal impact.

Attachments

1. 09.18.26 Staff Report

2. CSSC Bylaws, or Resolution No. 2013-05

3. IDEA Committee Bylaws

4. Exhibit A PAAC Reso (1)-combined (1)
City Manager Approval
Jeremy Dennis, City
Manager
05/02/2026

RESOLUTION NO. 2013-05

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRISBANE CONCERNING THE ORGANIZATION AND

OPERATION OF THE COMPLETE STREETS SAFETY COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, on July 27, 1998, the City Council established the Traffic Advisory Committee to advise the City Council on various traffic issues including parking on residential streets, installation of traffic control devices, and other such matters as referred to the Committee from time to time by the City Council or the city staff; and
WHEREAS, on September 20, 2004, the Council refined and formalized the organization and operation of the Traffic Advisory Committee from an ad hoc committee to a formal committee consisting of five (5) members appointed by the Mayor for two year terms and subject to confirmation by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, in 2006, the Council amended the prior policies to allow from five (5) to seven (7) members to serve on the Committee and to specify that meetings should be held on a semi-annual basis; and WHEREAS, on July 21, 2003, the Council did consider establishment of a Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee to advise the Council on issues pertaining to bicycles and pedestrians; and WHEREAS, on October 26, 2003, the Council did create and adopt bylaws for a Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, consisting of four (4) members, including a Councilmember, a Parks, Beaches and Recreation Committee member, an appointed member of the public, and a city staff member; and WHEREAS, the State of California has emphasized the importance of Complete Streets by enacting the California Complete Streets Act of 2008 (AB 1358. Leno), which requires that when cities or counties revise general plans, they identify how they will provide for the mobility needs of all users of roadways; and
WHEREAS, the term “Complete Streets” describes a comprehensive, integrated transportation network with infrastructure and design that allows safe and convenient travel along and across streets for all users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, persons with disabilities, motorists, movers of commercial goods, users and operators of public transportation, seniors, children, youth, and families; and WHEREAS, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32, Nunez) sets a mandate for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in California, and the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (SB 375, Steinberg), requires emissions reductions through coordinated regional planning that integrates transportation, housing, and land-use policy, and achieving the goals of these laws will require significant increases in travel by public transit, bicycling, and walking; and WHEREAS, the City of Brisbane desires to further the health, safety, welfare, economic vitality, and environmental well-being of its community through coordinated planning of its local streets network that promotes safe, equitable, and convenient travel for all users while preserving flexibility, recognizing community context, and using the latest and best design guidelines and standards; and WHEREAS, the Council desires to combine the functions of the previously established Traffic Advisory and Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committees into one Complete Streets Safety Committee.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brisbane as follows:

The Complete Streets Safety Committee is hereby created and shall be governed by the following policies:
1) Organization and Membership. The Complete Streets Safety Committee shall consist of between five (5) and seven (7) members to be appointed by the City Council. Such Committee members shall serve without compensation. Members of the Committee must at all times during their service be residents of the city, and to the extent feasible, appointments shall be made of persons residing in different areas of the city. Public members of the dissolved Traffic Advisory Committee and Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee may transfer their membership to the Complete Streets Safety Committee.
2) Term of Office. Committee members serve in an advisory capacity at the pleasure of the City Council. Committee members shall be appointed for a staggered term of four years, unless the appointment is to fill a vacancy created other than by expiration of a term, in which case the appointment shall be for the remainder of the term.
3) Officers. The Committee shall elect from its members a Chair and Vice Chair, who shall hold office for a term of one year.
4) Meetings. Meetings of the Complete Streets Safety Committee shall be held on a monthly basis at such time and place as scheduled by the Committee staff, and notice of each meeting shall be given in compliance with the requirements of the Brown Act.
5) Quorum. A quorum is necessary for a Complete Streets Safety Committee meeting to be held. A majority of the voting members of the committee shall constitute a quorum. In the event that there is no quorum, any discussions which are held by those assembled shall be regarded as informal and non-binding.
6) Subcommittees. Subcommittees may be created as deemed useful by the Committee. 7) Responsibilities. The Complete Streets Safety Committee shall review the following matters:
a) The first priority of the committee shall be to review and propose a plan to provide safe pedestrian routes to schools.
b) The committee shall review those modifications to the circulation element of the General Plan required by the California Complete Streets Act of 2008, and provide recommendations to the Planning Commission as to whether or not those modifications plan for a balanced, multi-modal transportation network that meets the needs of all users of streets, roads and highways, defined to include: motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, children, person with disabilities, seniors, movers of commercial goods, and users of public transportation, in a manner that is suitable to the context of the general plan. c) The committee shall perform initial plan and policy level review of materials relevant to the Complete Streets Act, including, but not limited to bicycle, pedestrian and/or trail master plans and city street standards.
d) The committee shall make recommendations to the City Council on the implementation of relevant programs of the City’s 1994 General Plan policies 38-43 (traffic flow, convenience and access),

44-51 (traffic safety), 52-55 (transit and transportation management, 56-57 (parking), 58-63 (bicycles), and 64-68 (pedestrians) and comparable programs in the forthcoming revised General Plan. e) The committee shall review grant applications for various transportation and traffic related infrastructure improvements prepared and presented by city staff. f) The committee shall review such other various public traffic issues as may be referred to them by the City Council, the City Manager, the Director of Public Works or the Chief of Police. 8) Staff Support. The City Manager’s designees from the Public Works and the Police Departments will serve as staff advisors to the committee, and shall give notice of meetings, keep and maintain records of committee meetings and recommendations, and generally provide such support and assistance as the committee may require in order to perform its responsibilities.

Effective upon the adoption of this Resolution, the Traffic Advisory Committee and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee are dissolved and all resolutions, motions or other actions of the City Council pertaining to the establishment or operation of said Committees shall be deemed to have been rescinded and superseded by the policies set forth in this Resolution.

Raymond C. Miller, Mayor
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2013-05, was duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the Brisbane City Council on March 18, 2013 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Conway, Lentz, O’Connell, and Mayor Miller NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Sheri Marie Spediacci, City Clerk

IDEA Committee By Laws Page 1 of 1
MEMO
Meeting Date: March 16, 2022
From: Ingrid Padilla, City Clerk
Subject: IDEA Committee By-Laws
To review the IDEA Committee By-Laws please refer to the Staff Report and Approved Resolution creating the Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Accountability Committee from the City Council Meeting of February 3, 2022.

Attachments

1. Staff Report and Approved Resolution Creating the IDEA Committee from the City Council Meeting of 2/3/2022

By Laws for the Citywide IDEA Committee

CITY COUNCIL DIVERSITY SUBCOMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: February 3, 2022
From: Staff EPIC (Equity Plus Inclusion Committee)
Subject: Formal Establishment of the Citywide Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Accountability (IDEA) Committee
Community Goal/Result
Community Building
Purpose
Increase participation in the community from less represented groups.

Recommendation
Adopt the attached resolution formally establishing the Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Accountability (IDEA) Committee.

Background
On September 23, 2021, the City Council approved creating a citizen committee with the purpose of defining the meaning of diversity and inclusion for the City of Brisbane. The committee would also be an ambassador for the City to various aspects of the community, and it would provide feedback to the City Council on issues related to diversity and inclusion.

Following Council’s approval, staff met with the City Council Diversity sub-committee to discuss the particulars of such a Committee, such as appointments, number of committee members, etc. Based on that discussion and recommendation of the subcommittee, staff is now recommending Council formally create the Committee with these components.

Discussion
Creation - Appointment – Qualification There would be a permanent IDEA Committee which would consist of 5-7 public members appointed by the City Council. The Committee members would serve without compensation and would be in an advisory capacity to the Council Members of the Committee must at all times during their service be residents of the City or work within the City.

The Committee members would be appointed by the City Council after soliciting applications from the community. The following criteria shall be among those used for selecting appointees to the IDEA Committee:

1. Demonstrated interest in inclusion, diversity, and equity issues,

2. Willingness to bring diverse perspectives to the committee, Attachment 1

By Laws for the Citywide IDEA Committee

3. Willingness to dedicate sufficient time and effort

4. Does not work for the City of Brisbane
The interview and selection process shall be similar to the process utilized by the City Council in the appointment of other committees and commissions. As to the initial appointments, some would be for four year terms and some would be for two year terms.

Term of office
After the initial four-year and two-year appointments, the Committee members would serve staggered, four-year terms, with the majority of terms to commence in the years that three Council seats are scheduled to be filled by regular election and remaining terms to commence in the years that two seats are scheduled to be filled by regular election. Thereafter, Committee members appointed would all serve for a term of four years unless the appointment is to fill a vacancy created other than by expiration of a term in which event the appointment shall be for the unexpired portion of the term. There would be a vacancy for any Committee member who no longer lives or works in the City, or who resigns. Any Committee member may be removed with or without cause by a vote of at least three members of the City Council.

Officers
The Committee would elect from its members a Chair and a Vice Chair. Members would be encouraged to rotate Chair and Vice Chair annually.

Meetings
The IDEA Committee would meet monthly unless otherwise approved by the Committee. Meetings of the Committee would be held at a location to be determined by the Committee or the Committee staff and notice of each meeting would be provided in the manner prescribed by the Brown Act. Time, dates, and location of the meetings would be determined by a vote of the majority of the Committee subject to the availability of meeting facilities and support staff. Efforts will be made to encourage attendance and participation by members of the public.

The IDEA Committee may, from time to time, also hold joint meetings as needed with the City Council, and other commissions and committees.

Quorum
A quorum is necessary for an IDEA committee meeting to be held. A majority of the members of the IDEA Committee shall constitute a quorum.

Subcommittees
Subcommittees may be formed, as needed, in relation to the work of the IDEA Committee and as prescribed by the Brown Act.

Responsibilities
The primary responsibility of the IDEA Committee will be to make recommendations to the City Council on the implementation of relevant community-focused program, events and policies

By Laws for the Citywide IDEA Committee
that support and enhance inclusion, diversity and equity issues and accountability for these issues. That responsibility will include preparing community-based and focused policy, event and program recommendations and an annual workplan for the City Council to review and approve.

In order for the IDEA Committee to work expeditiously, its members should receive appropriate education in the tasks before them, pay close attention to timelines and priorities, meet as often as required, keep track of ideas not directly on agenda items for future reference, recognize that inclusion, diversity, and equity issues are necessarily complex, sensitive, and holistic, and pick a Chair who will provide leadership consistent with these principles.

Staff support
The City Manager or a staff person designated by the Manager would serve as the staff advisor to the IDEA Committee and give notice of meetings, keep and maintain records of Committee meetings and recommendations, and generally provide such support and assistance as the Committee may require in order to perform its responsibilities.

Fiscal Impact
The cost of the program will depend on how many hours of staff time is needed to support the committee.

Measure of Success
The City becomes a more inclusive community for persons or groups that have had lower representation than in the past.

1 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-07

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRISBANE FORMALLY

CREATING THE INCLUSION, DIVERSITY, EQUITY AND ACCOUNTABILTY (IDEA)

COMMITTEE
The City Council of the City of Brisbane resolves as follows:

Section 1. Creation
There is hereby created a permanent Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Accountability (IDEA) Committee to consist of five to seven public members appointed by the City Council. Committee members will serve without compensation and will serve in an advisory capacity to the Council. Members of the Committee must at all times during their service be residents of the City or work within the City.

Section 2. Appointment
The City Council shall appoint all Committee members after soliciting applications from the community. City Council shall use (among others) the following criteria for selecting persons to be appointed to the Committee:

1. Demonstrated interest in inclusion, diversity, and equity issues

2. Willingness to bring diverse perspectives to the Committee

3. Willingness to dedicate sufficient time and effort

4. Does not work for the City of Brisbane
The Council interview and appointment process shall be similar to the process utilized by the City Council in the appointment of other committees and commissions. As to the initial appointments, a majority shall be for one-year terms and the remainder shall be for two-year terms.

Within 30 days of the expiration of a member’s term of office, a member may request the City Council to re-appoint the member to the Committee. The City Council may re-appoint the member to the Committee without re-interviewing the member.

Section 3. Term of Office
After the initial one-year and two-year appointments, Committee members shall serve staggered, two -year terms, with the majority of terms to commence in the years that three Council seats are scheduled to be filled by regular election and remaining terms to commence in the years that two seats are scheduled to be filled by regular election. Thereafter, Committee members appointed shall all serve for a term of two year unless the appointment is to fill a vacancy created other than by expiration of a term, in which event the appointment shall be for

2 the unexpired portion of the term. If a Committee member no longer lives or works in the City, or resigns, the member’s seat on the Committee shall be deemed to be vacant and the individual shall no longer serve on the Committee. Any Committee member may be removed with or without cause by a vote of the majority of the City Council.

Section 4. Officers
The Committee shall elect from its members a Chair and a Vice Chair. Members are encouraged to rotate Chair and Vice Chair annually.

Section 5. Meetings
The Committee shall meet monthly unless otherwise approved by the Committee. Meetings of the Committee shall be held at a location to be determined by the Committee or the Committee staff and notice of each meeting shall be provided in the manner prescribed by the Brown Act. The Committee shall determine the time, dates, and location of the meetings subject to the availability of meeting facilities and support staff. Meetings will be open to the public and efforts will be made to encourage attendance and participation by members of the public. The Committee may, from time to time, also hold joint meetings as needed with the City Council, and other commissions and committees.

Section 6. Quorum
A quorum is necessary for a Committee meeting to be held. A majority of the authorized members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum. For example, if the City Council has authorized five members of the Committee, then three members shall constitute a quorum; if City Council has authorized six or seven members of the Committee, then four members shall constitute a quorum.

Section 7. Effective Date
This resolution is effective immediately upon its passage and adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council at a regular meeting on February 3, 2022. _______________________

COLEEN MACKIN, MAYOR

3 I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Brisbane City Council at a regular meeting held on February 3, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Cunningham, Davis, Lentz, O’Connell and Mayor Mackin NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
_______________________
Ingrid Padilla, City Clerk
Approved as to form
____________________________
Thomas McMorrow, City Attorney

RESOLUTION 2026- XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRISBANE AMENDING THE PUBLIC ART

IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
WHEREAS, the City of Brisbane adopted Brisbane's Art in Public Places Program Ordinance ("Public Art Ordinance") in 2014 with the objectives of fostering public appreciation for art, enhancing quality of life, and reinforcing Brisbane's distinctive identity within the Bay Area.

WHEREAS, the City Council enacted the Public Art Implementation Guidelines to promote community participation, maintain a diverse collection, cultivate a sense of place, and facilitate artist engagement.

WHEREAS, the Guidelines were most recently amended on September 18, 2025 to ensure consistency with the Public Art Master Plan. As part of this amendment, the structure of the Public Art Advisory Committee (PAAC) was adjusted by eliminating the appointment of two Parks and Recreation Commissioners and two Councilmembers and increasing the number of community members from three to seven.

WHEREAS, in order to align with other city committees, there is a desire to amend the Public Art Implementation Guidelines to reflect a range of five to seven committee members appointed by Council
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Brisbane does hereby resolve as follows:

Section 1. The Public Art Implementation guidelines are amended to allow five to seven members to serve on the Public Art Advisory Committee, as shown in Exhibit A.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Brisbane at a regular meeting on May 7, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Ingrid Padilla, City Clerk

Public Art Implementation Guidelines
City of Brisbane
Amended by the City Council on March 5, 2026 May 7, 2026 Purpose
The City of Brisbane adopted a Public Arts Ordinance in 2014 in order to increase citizens’ appreciation of art, to improve quality of life, and to enhance Brisbane’sidentity as a unique community within the greater Bay Area. Additionally, public art should stimulate creativity, imagination, induce creative conflict, and add a unique human quality to the community environment and enrich public spaces. A city rich in art becomes an outdoor cultural museum accessible to everyone. Public art can and should be an integral part of the design and the planning process of all development.

Mission
The mission for public art in the City of Brisbane isto support community identity, unity, and pride through diverse artwork that grabs attention and distinguishes a unique sense of place.

Goals

1. Community Involvement – A community develops a specific identity and character over time.

Residents are uniquely qualified to provide insight into the types of public artwork that are best suited for the community depending on the size of the project. Those who reside in the community are encouraged to participate in the selection process of public art pieces by participating at public meetings.

2. Diversity of Art – The collection should be diverse in itsrepresentation of artists and artistic styles and be reflective of the ethnic and cultural diversity of the community.

3. Creation of Sense of Place – Art is important to our common experience because it brings focus, importance, and cohesion to public spaces. Public art develops images and provides experiences that reflect the historical and cultural essence of a community. Public art transforms public spaces by giving them context and relevance and making them places of community interest and pride.

Public art has the potential to improve the appearance of an entire business block; to heighten the ethnic, historical or cultural aspects of the community and to attract foot traffic to an area that formerly had little or none.

4. Artist Participation – By encouraging collaboration between artist, architects, and engineers, we can provide an aesthetic dimension that expands possibilities for creating public spaces for the community.

Definitions
• Artist: An individual or team of individual artists whose body of work and professional activities demonstrate serious ongoing commitment to the fine arts. Members of architectural, engineering, design or landscaping firms retained for the design and construction of a

2 development project covered by these Guidelines shall not be considered artists for the purpose of meeting the requirement to provide public art.
• Arts professional: An individual who works in the fine arts field (such as arts consultant, fine arts curators, fine arts collectors, art critics, or art educators). • Artwork or work of art: All forms of original creations of visual arts, including but not limited to:
1) sculpture in any material or combination of materials; 2) painting- all media including portable and permanently affixed works, such as murals and frescoes; 3) graphic arts, print making and drawing; 4) mosaics; 5) photography; 6) crafts in clay, fiber and textiles, wood, metal, plastics and other materials; 7) calligraphy; 8) stained glass; and 9) mixed media – any combination of forms or media, including collage.
• Artwork cost: Artwork cost is the total amount budgeted by the City for a public artwork project. • Building valuation: The total dollar amount of all construction permits for the same development project using the latest building valuation data as set forth by the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) building valuation.
• Conceptual design plan: The initial phase of the approval of public artwork that includes review of the artist’s or artist team’s qualifications, conceptual artwork design, and artwork location. • Deaccession: Refers to the permanent removal of a work of art from a collection. • Design: Artwork detailing project design, including scale drawings within site context, sealed by an engineer, if required.
• Fabrication: A detailed description of the methods of fabrication as well as any uncommon or unusual details regarding the approach to creating an artwork piece. • Final design plan: The final phase of the approval of public artwork that involves consideration of a highly defined proposal that conforms to the concept previously considered and approved by the Committee.
• In-lieu contribution: In place of an approved artwork on the site, a developer may elect to pay to the City an amount equal to the program allocation set forth in the Public Arts Ordinance. In-lieu fees shall be submitted to the City and deposited into the Public Art Fund before the issuance of a building permit for the development project except when a different time period is approved by the Community Development Director and Parks and Recreation Director. • Installation: A detailed description of the installation procedure if the artwork will not be fabricated directly on the selected site. Installation would include the construction of any required footings or foundation.
• Public art: Any permanent display of a work of visual art that was specifically designed to be located on a site where it would be easily accessible to the public, either on private or public property within the City of Brisbane.
• Public Art Advisory Committee: A committee made of five to seven seven Brisbane community members, appointed by City Council. The Community members shall serve twoyear terms and one of whom will be professionally engaged in the art community, one of whom will be an employee or owner of a business located in Brisbane, and the other members will be residents of Brisbane. This change in membership will not be effective until City Council has made four appointments to replace the two City Council and the two Park and Recreation members. Members of

3 the Public Art Advisory Committee will be ineligible to propose public art projects while they serve on the Committee and for 1 year after they leave the Committee. • Public art fund: An interest-bearing account that is managed by the City Manager, or designee, into which public art funds, including donated funds, in-lieu funds and/or public art grant funds are deposited.
• Public Art Master Plan: The Public Art Master Plan, adopted by the City Council in 2025, is a strategic guide for developing and managing the city's public art program. It outlines the vision, goals, and policies for incorporating art into public spaces, and defines processes for artselection, acquisition, maintenance, and deaccession.
• Public place: An interior or exterior area on public or private property that is easily accessible by and highly visible to the general public.
• Request for Proposals (RFP): A formal document published by the City to solicit bids or proposals from prospective artists for projects under $75,000.
• Request for Qualifications (RFQ): A formal document published by the City to solicit bids or proposals from prospective artists for projects $75,000 or more.

General Procedure
Public artwork is limited to permanent, or semi-permanent (i.e. loaned art on rotation), visual works of art, as opposed to performing, written, or temporary art. Visual art includes but is not limited to murals, sculptures, artist-designed landscape features, streetscape features, earthworks, environmental installations, and water and digital displays.

Any money donated to or collected through the Building Permit process will be deposited in the Public Art Fund. The City Manager, or designee, shall administer the funds and establish accounting records according to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). The City Manager or designee will authorize all disbursementsfrom the Public Art Fund. The accountshall not be added to the City’s General Fund.

The process for selecting the public piece to be installed will depend on whether or not the artwork is commissioned by the City of Brisbane or by a private person or entity.

All privately installed Public Art will be reviewed by a Public Art Advisory Committee. The Public Art Advisory Committee is responsible for reviewing and making decisions on conceptual design plans submitted by a developer of a project subject to the public art requirement.

Additionally, on an annual basis the Public Art Advisory Committee will meet to review the balance of funds in the Public Art Fund to determine if they should propose any projects be initiated and commissioned by the City.

The Public Art Advisory Committee shall ensure all public art projects meet the public art selection criteria as outlined in the Public Art Master Plan for selection of an artist or artist team, artwork, and artwork location established in this procedure, before submittal of the Final Design Plan to the City Council.

4 The following procedure will be used to review and approve public art projects:

Public Art Selection process for private developers on private property A process map within the Public Art Master Plan outlines the procedure for public art initiated by private developers. Options for private developers include:
1) contributing the required amount to the city’s Public Art Fund; 2) procuring public art themselves with support from the Public Art Advisory Committee; or 3) executing a public art project independently.

In options 2 and 3, the private developer must submit detailed design plans to the Public Art Advisory Committee for review, including artist qualifications and budget details. The Public Art Advisory Committee may make a recommendation concerning the project to the City Council for consideration.

Between options 2 and 3, it is in the better interest of the private developer to follow option 2 in order to include the community in the public art process and thereby build goodwill, as well as to increase the likelihood of receiving City Council approval.

For option 2:

1. The project contact will meet with the designated staff from the City prior to submitting concept design plans.

2. The Public Art Advisory Committee will assess project goals and internal capacity and make a determination whether to facilitate the developer’s art procurement process. If the Public Art Advisory Committee elects to take on the project, it will follow the City’s Public Art selection process for City-initiated projects as outlined in the Public Art Master Plan. Alternatively, the Public Art Advisory Committee may refer the developer to a public art partner (e.g. an independent firm) to support the developer’s process of art procurement.

For options 2 and 3:

3. Once artwork is selected, the developer will submit the required documentation to appropriate City staff for review. Proposals must include preliminary sketches, photographs, or other documentation of sufficient descriptive clarity to indicate the nature of the proposed work.

4. An appraisal or other evidence of the value of the proposed artwork, including acquisition and installation costs. If the value of a proposed artwork (by past records of comparable work sold, etc.) cannot be verified, City staff may choose to have the artist’s proposal and or/other completed works appraised by a qualified art appraiser selected by the City. The developer will pay up-front for any art appraisal service fees. This expense will be deducted from the total artwork allocation cost.

5. Preliminary plans must contain such detailed information as may be required by the Public Art Advisory Committee to adequately evaluate the location of the artwork in relation to the

5 proposed development, including compatibility with the character of adjacent conforming developed parcels and existing neighborhood if necessary.

6. A preliminary budget must show the proposed public art project is consistent with the public art ordinance requirements.

7. Within 30 days of receiving a completed application, the Public Art Advisory Committee will hold an open meeting to discuss the proposed project. The meeting will be noticed to all properties within 1,000 feet of the property and posted as required by law. With the agreement of the developer, the meeting may take place more than 30 days from receiving the completed application.

The proposed artwork project will be reviewed using the following criteria as applied to the supporting documentation and past projects:

Artistic quality (vision, originality, and craftsmanship); Context (architectural, historical, geographical, and socio-cultural context of the site); quality and permanency of materials; maintenance;safety; diversity of artists; representation in the existing collection of publicly-accessible artworks; and diversity of artworks (media, scale, style, intention) in the existing collection of publicly accessible artworks.

8. The Public Art Advisory Committee will make a recommendation on the proposed artwork to the City Council.

9. The City Council will have the final approval for any public artwork project. If the Council does not approve the proposed project, it can refer the item back to the Advisory Committee for reconsideration.

10. All costs of maintaining a privately installed Public Art work will be the expense of the private entity unless the City accepts the Public Art piece as a donation. Refer to the art donation policy in the Public Art Master Plan.

Public Art selection process for the City of Brisbane

1. A process map within the Public Art Master Plan outlines the procedure for selecting public art initiated by the city. The Public Art Advisory Committee will recommend to the City Council the amount of money from the Public Art Fund to be used on any publicly installed public art pieces and the breakout between Administrative and Maintenance costs of the project. The Public Art Advisory Committee will also recommend a location for the art project, type of artwork when appropriate, process for involving the community, and method of calling for artists.

2. The Council will approve available funds for the artwork and solicit members to be part of an Art Selection Committee, if needed.

3. The Public Art Advisory Committee shall select an artist, or group of artists, through a public process using one of the following methods:
a. Request for Qualifications (RFQ), for projects $75,000 or more b. Request for Proposals (RFP), for projects under $75,000 c. Invitational competition.

6 4. The Public Art Advisory Committee will rank various artist proposals during open public meetings at which the community may participate, after which the Committee will make a recommendation to the City Council for the award of an artist contract.

5. The City Council shall consider the Public Art Advisory Committee’s recommendations on the artist or artist group and then make a decision.

6. The Public Art Advisory Committee, any outside professional hired by the City for assisting with the selection of the artwork, and the appropriate City staff (as needed for the particular project) shall meet regularly with the selected artist, or group of artists, in developing the Conceptual Design Plan that meets the artwork and location criteria.

7. Once the Conceptual Design Plan has been approved by the Public Art Advisory Committee, the artist or artist’s team shall refine the project objectives and the Conceptual Design Plan according to the direction of the Public Art Advisory Committee.

8. The final design will be approved by the City Council.

Use of Funds
All funds appropriated for public art will be deposited in the Public Art Fund. The City Council shall authorize projects for funding as prescribed in the public art implementation guidelines. In circumstances where it is not feasible to incorporate artistic features into a particular project, such money will be pooled and used for art in other projects. Disbursements shall be made in connection with projects approved by City Council. Nothing herein prohibits the City from soliciting or receiving grants, donations, bequests or gifts from private or public sources.

For individual pieces of art, the Public Art Advisory Committee will recommend to the City Council what percentage of the funds will be set aside for the Public Art, Maintenance and Administration, and Education based on the guidelines below and those established in the Public Art Master Plan:

1. Public Art Funds
No less than sixty-five percent (65%) of the fees collected shall be directed for Public Art Acquisition and may be spent for the following purposes:
a) Artists’ services and fees.
b) Acquisition of art.
c) Artist selection processes, including jury selection costs and model or design fees.

No more than fifteen percent (15%) of the money collected may be directed for maintenance and curatorial services:
a) Identifying plaques
b) Repair, maintenance, surveys, curatorial services, and other conservation work necessary to keep all artworks in the City collection in standard condition.

No more than twenty percent (20%) of the fee may be directed for Public Art Administration and may be spent for the following purposes:
a) Project administration.

7 b) Community education programs, publicity, dedications, temporary ephemeral projects, and other purposes as recommended by the Public Art Advisory Committee and approved by the City Council.

CITY of BRISBANE
Council Subcommittee Update
From April 11th, 2026, to May 1st, 2026

1. Report Out on Subcommittees/Committees
A. Sierra Point Parkway Parks & Open Space Subcommittee 4/23 Kern, Lentz The Subcommittee met to review updated design plans for Parcel R at 95% completion, representing revisions based on previous feedback. The team presented modifications including removing trees to improve views, widening the promenade, and adjusting grades to reduce earthwork costs. Key design elements discussed included artificial turf for durability, painted murals for the promenade, picnic area rental zone delineation, and various art components including an entry sign and playful art pieces. The presentation covered both base project elements and Phase 2 enhancements, with the base project being fully priced while Phase 2 elements would require additional funding. Staff indicated potential opportunities to reallocate funds from other budget sources to accommodate Phase 2 elements, such as Sierra Point Lighting & Landscaping District (SPLL) any lighting or site drainage. It was suggested to use solar lighting and receive a budgeted line items list for Phase 2, so it can continue momentum.

Next Steps #1: Bozorginia to look at SPLL guidelines for qualifying projects on Parcel R.

Next Steps #2: The subcommittee will meet one more time prior to the topic going to Council.

To view the agenda packet and presentation:
https://brisbaneca.portal.civicclerk.com/event/6798/files/agenda/9300 B. Quarry Subcommittee 4/23 Lentz, O’Connell
The Subcommittee received a presentation from Dave Brown of Benchmark Resources and Jim Summers of DeSilva Gates regarding the regulatory requirements for closing and reclaiming the Guadalupe Quarry, as mandated by the California Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA). The presentation included an overview of reclamation plans and their key components, as well as examples of similar projects in the Bay Area, including Leona Quarry in Oakland and La Vista Quarry in Hayward.

The Subcommittee also discussed potential future use scenarios for the site, including the continuation of asphalt production operations or the development of an advanced manufacturing center. https://brisbanequarry.com
Next Steps #1: Staff to find past annual inspections and reports.

To view the presentation:
https://brisbaneca.portal.civicclerk.com/event/6799/files/agenda/9309 C. Public Art Advisory Committee 4/23 Davis, O’Connell
The Committee received an update from Kiernan Graves regarding the Midtown Mural. The update included progress on efforts to protect the mural, as well as estimated costs associated with its completion and ongoing maintenance.

The City Council has expressed a desire to honor David Schooley for his contributions to San Bruno Mountain and his work in environmental stewardship. The Committee was asked to appoint one representative to serve on an ad hoc subcommittee, and Danielle Kellstedt was selected.

The Committee also reviewed the results of the Artful Bench community voting process and discussed recommendations for preferred artists at each location, including the option for multiple artists at the marina site. The Committee ultimately aligned with the public’s majority vote for the dog park location, selecting Alexis Gregg, and for the Marina location, selecting Chris Granillo. For the Mission Blue location, where the results were closely split, the Committee selected Spitler & Heilweil.

Next Steps #1: Recommend to City Council the selected artists chosen by the Committee Next Steps #2: Once the selected artists are under contract with the City, they will meet with the Public Art Committee to finalize designs for their designated location(s).

And finally, the Committee acknowledged the outgoing committee members and thanked them for their dedication and service – Madison Davis, Terry O’Connell, Tom Seawell and Julie Sims.

To view the agenda packet and video:
https://brisbaneca.portal.civicclerk.com/event/5753/files/agenda/9301

2. Upcoming Subcommittees:

None at this time.

3. Proposed Subcommittees:

Does any councilmember wish to propose any items for a subcommittee to discuss?