Buena Park City Council
September 24, 2024

B. Ordinance.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BUENA PARK DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council hereby finds that all the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.

Section 2. The proposed Zone Change No. Z-23-1 will be in conformance with the City’s General Plan, as amended, and will facilitate a townhome residential development resulting in additional housing to enhance the City’s residential housing stock. The Project further conforms to the General Plan goals and policies for the reasons set forth in the General Plan Amendment GP-23-1 Resolution, which findings are incorporated herein by reference.

Section 3. The City Council finds that Zone Change No. Z-23-1, as specified in Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof by reference, will promote the orderly development of the City and public health, safety and welfare.

Section 4. The City Council finds that Zone Change No. Z-23-1 will not have a detrimental effect upon land available for housing within the City. By applying the Zone Change to the Subject Property, will facilitate the development of a townhome multi-family residential development opportunity in the City.

Section 5. The proposed Zone Change will provide additional land available for viable residential development within the City, and will not create substantial demands for new infrastructure. Adequate infrastructure and utilities are available in the area to serve the Project and no substantial new infrastructure is required as a result of this Zone Change.

Section 6. The proposed Zone Change will promote the orderly development of the Subject Property with a new townhome multi-family residential development that will increase the City’s housing supply while conserving neighborhood property values.

Section 7. The City Council has reviewed and considered all components of the requested Zone Change No. Z-23-1 including compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) through the preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2 adopted by separate resolution, the City Council has determined that the Mitigated Negative Declaration is legally adequate and that the Zone Change would not result in any new or substantially severe environmental impacts than those considered and addressed by the mitigation measures included the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2.

Section 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion Ordinance No.

Zone Change No. Z-23-1
September 24, 2024

thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24
th day of September 2024, by the following called vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS:
____________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk
I, Adria M. Jimenez, City Clerk of the City of Buena Park, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was introduced and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Buena Park held on the 24th day of September 2024. _____________________________
City Clerk
Ordinance No.

Zone Change No. Z-23-1
September 24, 2024

Exhibit A
Existing Zoning District Map: CS (Community Shopping) Mixed Use Overlay – 45 RS-6 (One-Family Residential)
CR (Regional Commercial) Mixed Use Overlay-100
CS (Community Shopping) Mixed Use Overaly-45
Project Site
Ordinance No.

Zone Change No. Z-23-1
September 24, 2024

Exhibit A
Proposed Zoning District Map: RM-20 (Medium-Density Multifamily Residential) Mixed Use Overlay - 45
RS-6 (One-Family Residential)
CR (Regional Commercial) Mixed Use Overlay-100
CS (Community Shopping) Mixed Use Overaly-45
RM-20 (Medium Density Multifamily Residential) Mixed Use Overlay-45 Project Site
RESOLUTION NO.

TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. TT-24-1
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CU-24-1

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BUENA PARK APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE AN EXISTING 3.87-

ACRE PARCEL FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 93- UNIT TOWNHOMES, AND TO ALLOW BUILDING HEIGHTS UP TO 37 FEET 7 INCHES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8030 DALE STREET (APN:
070-501-01), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
WHEREAS, Christopher Courtney of Brandywine Homes,(“Applicant”), 2355 Main Street, Suite 220, Irvine, CA 92614, on behalf of Perge Ventures, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, property owner, 13000 E. Firestone Boulevard, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 has filed an application for a Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 to subdivide an existing parcel containing 3.87-acres for condominium purposes, and allow development of ninety-three (93) unit townhomes with building heights up to 37 feet 7 inches for the property located at 8030 Dale Street in Buena Park, California, in the County of Orange (APN: 070-501-01). Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map and Conditional Use Permit request are referred to as the “Application.”; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Buena Park conducted a duly noticed public hearing, as required by law, to consider Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 along with a Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND24-2 for the Project. Said public hearing was conducted and concluded on August 28, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 6359 recommending that the City Council adopt Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No.

CU-24-1, as conditioned; and
WHEREAS, on September 24, 2024, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application, as required by law, and concluded said hearing prior to the adoption of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Buena Park has reviewed and considered all components of the proposed Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 and concluded its public hearing prior to adoption of this resolution; and WHERAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

B. Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BUENA PARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in the Recitals of this Resolution are true and correct.

Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 September 24, 2024

Section 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced hearing, including written staff reports, verbal testimony, and the Conditional Use Permit CU-24-1 Development Plans stamped “RECEIVED JUL 3 2024 PLANNING DIV.” and Tentative Tract Map TT-24-1 Plans stamped “RECEIVED JUL 14 2024 PLANNING DIV.,” this City Council hereby specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows:

Conditional Use Permit
a. FINDING: The proposed use and development is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plans.

FACT: The proposed 93-unit townhome residential development is a permitted use within the RM-20 (Medium-Density Multifamily Residential) zone, as conditioned, and approved concurrently with General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1, Zone Change No.

Z-23-1, and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2 with the appropriate Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Measures will meet all applicable requirements of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, and other laws. The proposal is consistent with the design goals of the Architectural Design Guidelines for multifamily residential developments by providing building and site enhancements. The proposal will comply with density, lot coverage, setbacks, floor area, parking, circulation, open space, building materials, as conditioned, and other applicable requirements.
b. FINDING: The site is adequate in size, shape, topography, location, utilities and other factors, to accommodate the proposed use.

FACT: The site area will be adequate in size, shape, topography, location, utilities and other factors to accommodate the townhome community. The site is relatively flat, and can accommodate the proposed development along with open space provisions for the future residents.
c. FINDING: Adequate street access and traffic capacity are or will be available to serve the proposed development as well as existing and anticipated development in the surrounding area.

FACT: The Project will gain access from La Palma Avenue and Dale Street. La Palma Avenue is considered a Primary Highway in the City’s Mobility Element, within the General Plan. A Primary Highway is a four-lane divided roadway, with a typical right-ofway width of 100 feet, and a roadway width curb to curb of 84 feet, including a 14-foot median. Additionally, Dale Street is considered a Secondary Arterial in the City’s Mobility Element, within the General Plan. A Secondary Arterial is a four-lane undivided (without a median) roadway, with a typical right-of-way width of 80 feet, and a roadway width from curb-to-curb of 64 Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 September 24, 2024

feet. Both driveways enter the site into a 24-foot-wide interior street. The driveways are not proposed to be gated, which eliminates potential for queuing vehicles into the public right-ofway for site access. The Project proposes to construct a raised landscaped center median on La Palma Avenue to allow for left out and left in access to the Project site. As such, adequate street access and traffic capacity are available to serve the proposed 93-unit townhome development as well as existing and anticipated development in the surrounding area.
d. FINDING: Adequate utilities and public services will be available to serve the proposed development as well as existing and anticipated development in the surrounding area.

FACT: Adequate utilities and public services will be available, as conditioned, to serve the use, as well as, existing and anticipated development in the surrounding area. The Site is fully served by utilities, and meets the City standards for public services and utilities to the serve the Site.
e. FINDING: The use and development will be compatible with the intended character of the area.

FACT: The proposed 93-unit townhome residential development will be compatible with the intended character of the area and not negatively impact surrounding properties since the investment in the currently underutilized property with a vacant commercial building will elevate the property’s aesthetics. All improvements meet the Buena Park Municipal Code requirements for the RM20 zone as well as the Design Guidelines for Multi-Family for the purpose of promoting high-quality design that is compatible with adjacent properties. The exterior architectural design is in reasonable harmony with the architectural character of the surrounding area. All the building materials, colors, and finishes proposed for the townhome residential development are in harmony with the surrounding area. As conditioned, the
proposed 93-townhome units will enhance the visual integrity of the subject property as well as the surrounding area.
f. FINDING: Any criteria set forth elsewhere in this Title for the approval the specific use and development will be satisfied.

FACT: Pursuant to the Buena Park Municipal Code (BPMC) Section

19.412.010 (Uses Permitted), condominiums require approval of a Conditional Use Permit in the RM-20 (Medium-Density
Multifamily Residential) zone as amended by Z-32-1. As
conditioned, the proposed townhome development will
complement the surrounding area and all the criteria set forth elsewhere in this Title for approval will be satisfied.

Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 September 24, 2024

g. FINDING: Any adverse effects of the use and development are justified and fully balanced by offsetting benefits to the public interest.

FACT: An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2 was prepared in connection with the associated General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1, Zone Change No. Z-23-1, Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1, and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-

1. Environmental impacts were studied and mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to mitigate potential environmental impacts to less than significant levels. Additionally, there are conditions of approval that shall be implemented to prevent potentially adverse effects on the general public.

Subdivision (TT-24-1)
a. The subdivision map design and improvements are consistent with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance and the State Subdivision Map Act. The plan conforms to density pursuant to the State Density Bonus Law (Government Code Section 65915), open space, street design, and includes required public improvements consistent with the General Plan designation of High-Density Residential as amended by GP-23-1. The High-Density Residential land use designation is characterized by condominium and apartment development with a base density of 20 dwelling units per acre. The density standard may increase to 24 dwelling units per acre with the application of the Site Area Bonus. The Affordable Housing Area Bonus may increase the density to 30 dwelling units. The Project proposes the development of 93 townhome units on approximately 3.87 acres, consistent with the High-Density Residential designation with the applied State Density Bonus Law. The Project further conforms to the General Plan goals and policies for the reasons set forth in Part B to Resolution for GP-23-1, which findings are incorporated herein by reference. The subdivision map is also consistent with the Zoning Code as amended by Zone Change Z-23-1, which rezones the Site from CS (Community Shopping) to RM-20 (Medium-Density Multifamily Residential) which authorizes medium-density residential uses. The Vesting Tentative Tract Map is consistent with RM-20 zoning district, and facilitates the development of the Site consistent with standards set forth in the Development Plans.
b. The site is physically suitable for the type of development. The site is rectangular in shape and is relatively flat and will accommodate the proposed development.

The development standards applicable to the Site are set forth in the Development Plan attached as Attachments 5a, 5b, and 6 to the Planning Commission Staff Report. The Development Plan proposes the development of the Site in a manner that is compatible with adjacent uses and the surrounding neighborhood with the townhomes generally dispersed evenly throughout the Project site. The Site, which is generally bounded by Dale Street to the west, La Palma Avenue to the north, and single-family residences to the east and south, promotes pedestrian and vehicular Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 September 24, 2024

accessibility with the main access to the Site located off La Palma Avenue with a secondary access driveway located off Dale Street. The Project also contemplates private streets that would provide internal circulation within the Project site. The internal streets would provide pedestrian access while maintaining an efficient circulation system for vehicles and emergency vehicle access. c. Neither the design of the subdivision nor the proposed improvements will cause environmental damage or affect fish, wildlife or their habitat. As evaluated in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND-24-2), the MND identified the following areas, which required mitigation to be considered less than significant impacts: Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology & Soils, Noise, Hazards & Hazardous Materials, and Tribal Cultural Resources. With the mitigation measures incorporated into the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program included in the MND-24-2, the environmental analysis concluded that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment.
d. The project design will be consistent with the existing and intended area character and design. The Project is harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood and the Vesting Tentative Tract Map facilitates the development of the Site consistent with the Development Plans, which implements the Project in a manner that is compatible with adjacent uses and the surrounding neighborhood. e. The design of the development and proposed improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, properties within the proposed subdivision. There is no public access easement through the site. Access will occur from public rights-of-way.

Section 3. The City Council has considered the proposed subdivision shown on the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, with the recommended conditions, to determine whether to make any of the findings set forth in the subsections of Section 66474 of the Government Code which states “A legislative body of a city or county shall deny approval of a vesting tentative map, or a parcel map for which a vesting tentative map was not required, if it makes any of the following findings:”
FINDING: Government Code Section 66474(a) - That the proposed map is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451.

FACT: As detailed above, the Vesting Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning, as amended. The Project conforms to the goals and policies in the General Plan as set forth in Part B for General Plan Amendment GP-23-1.

FINDING: Government Code Section 66474(b) - That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.

FACT: As detailed above, the design and improvement of the subdivision, as contemplated in the Development Plans attached as Attachments 5a, 5b, and 6 to the Staff Report, is consistent Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 September 24, 2024

with the General Plan and Zoning, as amended. The subdivision map design and improvements are consistent with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance and the State Subdivision Map Act. The plan conforms to density pursuant to the State Density Bonus Law (Government Code Section 65915), open space, street design, and includes required public improvements consistent with the General Plan designation of High-Density Residential and RM-20 (MediumDensity Multifamily Residential) as amended by GP-23-1 and Z23-1.

FINDING: Government Code Section 66474(c) - That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development.

FACT: The site is physically suitable for the townhome residential development proposed. As detailed above, the site is
rectangular in shape and is relatively flat and will accommodate the proposed development. The development standards
applicable to the Site are set forth in the Development Plan attached as Attachments 5a, 5b, and 6 to the Staff Report. The Development Plan proposes the development of the Site in a manner that is compatible with adjacent uses and the
surrounding neighborhood with the townhomes generally
dispersed evenly throughout the Project site. The Site, which is generally bounded by Dale Street to the west, La Palma Avenue to the north, and single-family residences to the east and south, promotes pedestrian and vehicular accessibility with the main access to the Site located off La Palma Avenue with a secondary access driveway located off Dale Street. The Project also contemplates private streets that would provide internal circulation within the Project site. The internal streets would provide pedestrian access while maintaining an efficient circulation system for vehicles and emergency vehicle access.

FINDING: Government Code Section(d) - That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

FACT: The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development which includes 93 residential townhome units on approximately 3.87 acres. The site is rectangular in shape and is relatively flat and will accommodate the proposed density for the development. The project site’s General Plan land use designation will need to be amended from the current
designation of Commercial to High Density Residential, as well as rezoned from Community Shopping (CS) to RM-20 (MediumDensity Multifamily Residential). Development in the HighDensity Residential land use designation is characterized by condominium and apartment development with a base density of 20 dwelling units per acre. The density standard may increase to 24 dwelling units per acre with the application of the Site Area Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 September 24, 2024

Bonus. The Affordable Housing Area Bonus may increase the density to 30 dwelling units. The proposed development of the site, which is primarily vacant, will help revitalize the site in a manner that will be harmonious with the adjacent
neighborhoods.

FINDING: Government Code Section(e) - That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

FACT: Neither the design of the subdivision nor the proposed improvements will cause substantial environmental damage or affect fish, wildlife or their habitat. As evaluated in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND-24-2), the MND identified the following areas, which required mitigation in order to be considered less than significant impacts: Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology & Soils, Noise, Hazards &
Hazardous Materials, and Tribal Cultural Resources. With the mitigation measures incorporated into the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program included in the MND-24-2, the
environmental analysis concluded that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment.

FINDING: Government Code Section 66474(f) - That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems.

FACT: Neither the design of the subdivision nor the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems.

Issues of public health were evaluated in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND-24-2), which determined that the Project will not have a significant impact on the environment.

FINDING: Government Code Section 66474(g) - That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.

FACT: Neither the subdivision nor the types of improvements will conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through, or use of, property within the subdivision. The Project contemplates private streets that would provide internal circulation within the Project site, including pedestrian access while maintaining an efficient circulation system for vehicles and emergency vehicle access.

Section 4. Government Code Section 66412.3. In approving this Vesting Tentative Tract Map, the City has considered the housing needs of the region. Approval of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map will facilitate the ability to develop approximately 93 residential units, which Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 September 24, 2024

will significantly enhance the City’s supply of housing, including the City’s supply of affordable housing. As evaluated in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND-24-2), the proposed project will be sufficiently serviced by infrastructure and public services will be sufficiently available.

Section 5. Government Code Section 66473.1. The design of the subdivision reflected on the Vesting Tentative Tract Map provides, to the extent feasible, for passive and natural heating and cooling opportunities. The residential buildings, and open spaces, will to the extent feasible, account for optimized shading, taking into account open space and building design requirements and associated design elements.

Section 6. The City Council of the City of Buena Park has reviewed and considered all components of the requested Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 and adopts the attached Mitigated Negative Declaration MND-24-2 and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and certifies that the Mitigated Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1, Zone Change No. Z-23-1, Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1, and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the State CEQA Guidelines, and local procedures adopted pursuant thereto, and has reviewed and considered the information contained in the MND. The City of Buena Park shall file a Notice of Determination (NOD) with the County Clerk of Orange County and the Secretary of the Resources Agency pursuant to the provisions of Section 21152 of Public Resources Code and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15075 adopted pursuant thereof.

Section 7. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in this Resolution, the City Council hereby approves Conditional Use Permit CU-24-1 Development Plans stamped “RECEIVED JUL 3 2024 PLANNING DIV.” and Tentative Tract Map TT-24-1 Plans stamped “RECEIVED JUL 14 2024 PLANNING DIV.,” as modified herein and the conditions set forth in Section 8 of this Resolution.

Section 8. The following conditions are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare and are reasonable and proper in accordance with the purpose and intent of the Buena Park City Code:

BUILDING DIVISION:

1. The project shall comply with state and federal disabled access requirements.

2. The project shall comply with the California Building Codes as adopted and amended by the City of Buena Park Municipal Code, Title 15.

3. The building/buildings shall be fully fire-sprinklered as required by the City of Buena Park Municipal Code, Title 1, and/or the California Building Codes.

4. A geotechnical investigation report prepared by a qualified geotechnical engineer is required. The applicant shall submit this report for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.

5. The construction plans require professional preparation. Submit plans and structural calculations prepared by a California registered engineer or architect.

6. After the public hearing appeal period ends, applicant shall submit three (3) sets of construction plans to the Building Division for plan check in order to obtain required building permits.

Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 September 24, 2024

ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY (OCFA):

1. Plan Submittal: The applicant or responsible party shall submit the plan(s) listed below to the Orange County Fire Authority for review. Approval shall be obtained on each plan prior to the event specified.

2. Prior to OCFA clearance of a final map or issuance of a precise grading permit or a building permit, if a grading permit is not required:
 Fire Master Plan (service code PR145)

3. Prior to issuance of a building permit:
 Underground piping for private hydrants and fire sprinkler systems (service code PR470-PR475)

4. Prior to concealing interior construction:
 Sprinkler monitoring system (service code PR500)

5. Specific submittal requirements may vary from those listed above depending on actual project conditions identified or present during design development, review, construction, inspection, or occupancy. Portions of the project that are deferred shall be subject to the codes, standards, and other applicable requirements in force on the date that the deferred plan is submitted to OCFA. Standard notes, guidelines, informational bulletins, submittal instructions, and other information related to plans reviewed by the OCFA may be found by visiting ocfa.org on the Planning and Development Section homepage.

6. Temporary/Final Occupancy Inspections: Prior to issuance of temporary or final certificate of occupancy, all OCFA inspections shall be completed to the satisfaction of the OCFA inspector and be in substantial compliance with codes and standards applicable to the project and commensurate with the type of occupancy (temporary or final) requested. Inspections shall be scheduled at least five days in advance by calling OCFA Inspection Scheduling at 714-573-6150.

7. Emergency Access Easements: Irrevocable reciprocal access easements for emergency access purposes to the benefit of the City of Buena Park shall be recorded concurrently with the final map or, where no final map is required, prior to approval of the fire master plan.

8. Lumber-drop Inspection: After installation of required fire access roadways and hydrants, the applicant shall receive clearance from the OCFA prior to bringing combustible building materials on-site. Call OCFA Inspection Scheduling at 714-573- 6150 with the Service Request number of the approved fire master plan at least five days in advance to schedule the lumber drop inspection.

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT:

DESIGN:

1. Grading, storm drain, street, sewer, water, and erosion control plans shall be prepared by a registered engineer, at a minimum scale of 1” = 40’, and on 24” by 36” sheets.

Any proposed improvements shall be designed and constructed per City Standards.

Any existing improvements in the public right-of-way, adjacent to project parcel frontage, that are not in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) shall be removed and reconstructed or added to meet the ADA requirements and must comply with City Standards.

Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 September 24, 2024

2. New Public Improvements to include the following:

A. All vehicular access to the site shall be provided in locations approved by the Traffic Division. An emergency access within the project parcel shall be approved by the Orange County Fire Authority and an approved copy of the plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Division with the submittal of the grading plan.

B. A raised landscape median on La Palma Ave. shall be constructed to accommodate left turns into and out of the development. It is the responsibility of the developer/owner to prepare a design that is submitted and approved by the Public Works Engineering Division. All landscaping/irrigation/sprinkler improvements within the median shall comply with the City of Buena Park Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance, Title 13, Chapter 13.30 of the Buena Park Municipal Code. The maintenance of the landscaped median, including all electrical, water and drainage facilities in public ROW shall be the City’s responsibility, upon completion of the project.

C. All new utilities to the project site shall be undergrounded.

D. Traffic Impact fees shall be in accordance with City Resolution 9726 and the latest City Fee Schedule. Sewer, water, and storm water impact fees shall be per the latest City Fee Schedule.

E. Planting of new trees and ground cover with irrigation system will be required within the parkway landscaping area along the project parcel frontage on Dale St. and La Palma Ave. The type of tree to be planted will be per the Urban Forest Management Plan which is as follows or other as approved by City Engineer:

Dale Street
 Primary: Mexican Fan Palm;
 Recommendation 1: Canary Island Pine;
 Recommendation 2: Southern Magnolia
La Palma Avenue
 Primary: Mexican Fan Palm;
 Recommendation 1: Mexican Fan Palm;
 Recommendation 2: Tuscarora Crape Myrtle;
 Recommendation 2: Evergreen Pear
Owner shall maintain landscaping area per Chapter 19.1112.070 of the City Code.

F. Developer shall install two SmartCover Systems or approved equal, to prevent sanitary sewer overflows. The SmartCover systems to be installed on manhole #37-104 and #42-95 both on La Palma Avenue, please see Exhibit A. The project level CC&R’s shall address allocation of costs associated with the payment of on-going annual monitoring fees and replacement power supply to the SmartCover Manufacture. Upon completion of the project, the City will be Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 September 24, 2024

responsible for the maintenance of the SmartCovers which includes the installation of the replacement power supply.

G. A double detector check assembly is required for domestic and fire service connections, and a reduced pressure principle device (RPPD) is required for irrigation service connection per City standards, and devices shall be supplied and installed by contractor. Contractor shall supply and install City approved water meters in the public right-of-way.

H. The existing two driveway approaches along Dale St. and the two driveway approaches along La Palma Ave. shall be removed and replaced with curb and gutter, sidewalk, and a landscape parkway per City Std. 206.

I. The proposed driveway approaches on Dale St. and on La Palma Ave. are to be constructed per City Std. 209. Sidewalks, curb and gutter along the project frontage that are lifted, fractured or failing shall be removed and replaced per City standards.

J. Easement shall be granted to the City when public water and sewer systems are installed within private land. Easement for Ingress and Egress and Public Security Vehicle purposes to be granted to the City of Buena Park with Final Map.

K. All existing public facilities in conflict with new improvements shall be relocated at no cost to the City. Property owner shall dedicate, or cause to be dedicated all easements needed to accommodate the relocation, modification or installation of facilities to be maintained by the City or any public utility company.

L. Water Meter Installation Requirements:

For 1” or smaller meter sizes, the water meter model shall be Neptune T-10 with Encoder that reads in gallons or City approved equal.

For 1.5” or larger meter sizes, the water meter model shall be Neptune HPT or Neptune MACH-10 with Encoder that reads in gallons or City approved equal.

3. Provide an engineering study for any proposed water connections to the City system.

The study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer for approval by the City Engineer. Any infrastructure upgrades necessary to meet the fire code or the domestic water capacity shall be mitigated by developer. Easements shall be dedicated as needed to accommodate a new public water system. The proposed utility connections shall be made to the City water systems in accordance with the City Code, standards and applicable Federal, State and County regulations.

4. A final hydrology and/or hydraulics study, prepared by a registered engineer, shall be submitted for approval when drainage is altered and/or there is a net increase of the storm water for the proposed project. The storm drain system shall be designed and constructed for a minimum of a 25-year flood per the County of Orange standards. It shall be privately owned and maintained.

5. A geotechnical study prepared by a registered geotechnical engineer is required. The report shall recommend pavement structural section of proposed streets and parking Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 September 24, 2024

lots. For the required WQMP, the report shall test and analyze soil conditions for LID (Low Impact Development) requirements, and the implementation of water quality for storm water runoff, including potential infiltration alternatives, soil compaction, saturation, permeability and ground water levels per the County of Orange Technical Guidance Document.

6. Prior to issuance of grading or building permits, permit applicant shall submit for approval, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on site to control pollutant run-offs.

This WQMP shall identify the: structural and non-structural measures, detailing implementation of BMP’s whenever they are applicable to the project. The design criteria and templates are can be found at:
https://buenapark.com/city_departments/public_works/engineering_services/water_q uality_management_plans.php

7. Prior to the issuance of grading permit for projects that will result in soil disturbance of one acre or more of land, a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) and assigned Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number from the State Water Resources Control Board shall be submitted to the City. As this project is subject to this requirement, the preparation and implementation of a Storm water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be submitted. A copy of the approved SWPPP by the State Water Resources Control Board shall be kept at the project site and be made available for the City upon request. The assigned WDID number must appear on the cover sheet of the grading plan.

8. A Tract map shall be prepared in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Division I of Title 18 of the City Code. All improvements required to be completed by applicant shall be in accordance with the City standards and specifications. All maps shall be concurrently reviewed by the City and the Orange County Survey Department.

The applicant shall forward all plan check comments received from the Orange County Survey Department to the City for each plan check.

PERMIT ISSUANCE:

1. All fees, deposits, and bonds associated with improvements required by the Public Works Department shall be paid prior to the issuance of permits for construction. The fee amounts are specified in the City Fee Schedule.

2. Before exercising any right or performing any obligation pursuant to any permit issued by the Public Works Department, the developer/contractor shall obtain a City Business License and submit required insurance certificates.

3. A Transportation Hauling permit shall be obtained to operate or move a vehicle or combination of vehicles or special mobile equipment of a size or weight of vehicle or load exceeding the maximums specified in the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the Caltrans Transportation Permit Manual.

4. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, applicant shall record an approved WQMP that includes the Master Covenant & Agreement and an Operational Maintenance Plan with the Orange County Recorder’s office. Two hard copies of the WQMP in 3-ring binders shall be provided to the City.

Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 September 24, 2024

5. Prior to final release of the project by the Public Works Department, or the refund of any cash deposits, the developer/contractor shall provide the City with a warranty bond to be held by the City for a period of one (1) year, for all public facilities and improvements.

6. Prior to the grant of occupancy by the City or commencement for the approved use, all improvements required by the Public Works Department shall be completed.

CONSTRUCTION:

1. A traffic control plan, prepared by a registered engineer, shall be submitted for approval for all utility connections, street improvements, and any other work performed in the public right-of-way that require a lane closure. A traffic control plan, prepared by a registered engineer, shall also be submitted for work on private property that results in lane closures.

2. When more than one trench cut is made to install utility lines, then the street shall be either slurry sealed or grind and capped with AC to the nearest lane line of a trench cut from property line to property line. The method of replacing the pavement in kind or better shall be decided based on existing pavement condition.

3. An Engineered Grading and Utility Certification shall be certified by the project engineer. Each phase of construction, fill and soil compaction, rough grading including pad elevations, final grading, utilities, and Water Quality Management Plan shall be certified by the project engineer and submitted to the City.

4. Prior to issuance of occupancy, applicant shall demonstrate all structural BMPs have been constructed in conformance with the approved WQMP.

5. The applicant/contractor shall be responsible for protecting all existing horizontal and vertical survey controls. Any survey controls disturbed during construction shall be reset per Orange County Surveyor Standards after construction.

6. All trash collection services needed during construction or after project completion shall be obtained from the City’s authorized provider.

PLANNING DIVISION:

1. This approval shall be contingent upon the approval of General Plan Amendment No.

GP-23-1, Zone Change No. Z-23-1, Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1, and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2.

2. This approval shall be for the development of a 93-unit townhome development consisting of one (1) density bonus unit, associated off-street parking, open space, and site improvements on approximately 3.87 acres on a property located at 8030 Dale Street in substantial compliance with Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 Development Plans dated “RECEIVED JUL 3, 2024 PLANNING DIV.,” and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 19319 Plans dated “RECEIVED JUL 14, 2024 PLANNING DIV.,” and as conditioned herein.

Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 September 24, 2024

3. The applicant and/or property owner shall ensure that a copy of the Planning Commission Resolution, including all conditions of approval, and mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, be reproduced on the first pages of construction drawings and shall be distributed to all design professionals, contractors, and subcontractors participating in the construction phase of the project.

4. The project shall be subject to all the mitigation measures and Project Design Features/Conditions of approval contained within the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Appendix L of the Final Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration), dated August 28, 2024 and incorporated herein by reference, as Conditions of Approval.

5. An affordable housing agreement on a City provided form to be approved by the City Attorney shall be required prior to Building Division permit issuance. The proposed project will provide a total of 14 units to be designated as affordable housing as demonstrated in the “Affordable Housing Exhibit” dated July 15, 2024. Of the 14 units of affordable housing proposed, 12 units are designated as moderate-income and 2 units are designated as low-income. The affordable housing units shall be deed restricted for a term of 55 years.

6. Plans submitted for plan check shall include architectural amenities generally consistent with the submitted CU-24-1 conceptual development plans stamped “RECEIVED JUL 3, 2024 PLANNING DIV.,” and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 19319 Plans dated “RECEIVED JUL 14, 2024 PLANNING DIV.” All construction drawings submitted for the development shall include sufficient construction details showing architectural accents, colors, details of construction, and techniques to ensure architectural compatibility throughout the development. Final details shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits for the project. Final color and material samples shall be provided to the Planning Division with plan check submittals. Architectural features may be replaced or modified subject to approval of the Community and Economic Development Director, based on equivalent provision of acceptable alternatives. Specifications and samples of the following shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval prior to issuance of building permits:
a. Paint colors for stucco
b. Stucco exterior finishes
c. Roofing material
d. Window trim
e. Window shutters
f. Gable accents
g. Awnings
h. Iron railing
i. Enhanced light fixtures
Architectural features may be replaced or modified subject to approval of the Community and Economic Development Director, based on equivalent provision of acceptable alternatives.

7. Color and material samples shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval prior to issuance of building permits. The applicant shall demonstrate that proposed Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 September 24, 2024

building materials, and other architectural/site features are rated for appropriate durability and longevity. In the event that said rating cannot be obtained, alternate materials shall be used under the direction of the Planning Division.

8. The second and third story windows on the east elevation of building “7A” and “8B”, and the second story windows of the south elevations of buildings “9-13 C” and the east elevation of building “4D” shall be located to promote privacy between properties through such methods as offset or clerestory placement, use of opaque or viewobscuring glass, or faux windows.

9. A total of 186 garage parking spaces, and 27 open parking spaces, including 2 accessible parking spaces shall be provided and maintained.

10. Any new walls and fencing, including those shown on plans shall comply with the City of Buena Park Municipal Code (BPMC) Chapter 19.428 (Development Standards – Fences, Walls, Hedges, and Berms) and shall require separate fence and wall permit approval by the Planning Division, as necessary.

11. A 6-inch wide decorative masonry wall, at least 6 ft. high measured from the highest finished grade on either side of the wall, shall be provided and maintained along the south and east property lines; existing block walls on the south and east property lines shall be repaired and finished where needed consistent with the submitted conceptual plans stamped “RECEIVED JUL 3, 2024 PLANNING DIV.,” and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 19319 Plans dated “RECEIVED JUL 14, 2024 PLANNING DIV.” in accordance with the structural design approved by the Building Division. All the perimeter walls shall match in color and texture. No block wall construction shall occur until a Grading Plan has been approved by the Public Works Department, if required. Double walls shall be filled and capped to the satisfaction of the City.

12. Landscaping shall be installed in substantial compliance with plans dated “RECEIVED JUL 3, 2024 PLANNING DIV.”. Detailed landscaping/irrigation/sprinkler plans, with signed and stamped Certification of Landscape Design form shall be submitted to the Planning Division for plan check. A ‘Landscape Installation Certificate of Completion’ shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to final inspection of building permits.

All landscaping/irrigation/sprinkler plans shall comply with the City of Buena Park Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance, Title 13, Chapter 13.30 of the Buena Park Municipal Code.

13. The planting of trees and shrubs shall have plant material selected and planting methods used which are suitable for the soil and climatic conditions of the site. All landscaping areas along the entire site including along the east and south property lines shall be planted with sufficient quantities that include a mixture of 15-gallon, 24- inch box, including mature specimen trees up to a 36-inch box size, to provide screening and protect privacy of adjacent properties. The proposed type, sizes and locations of all landscaping along the east and south property lines shall comply with Southern California Edison easement land use guidelines to ensure that all landscaping will not impact the existing easements located within the property.

14. The open space areas within the development shall be generally consistent with the plans dated “RECEIVED JUL 3, 2024 PLANNING DIV.” Specific features, including Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 September 24, 2024

exact design and specifications including landscaping, specified areas for active and passive areas shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. The open space areas and site amenities shall have appropriate durability and longevity and include elements that are consistent with the following:
a. Bar-be-que grills
b. Picnic tables and benches
c. Trellis shade structure
d. Bike racks
e. Trash, recycle, and hot ash receptacles
f. Play structures and safety surfacing
g. Decorative boulders
h. Pet waste stations

15. Decorative lighting to complement the Spanish Colonial architectural design of the development shall be provided throughout the entire development including the parking area and open space areas. Final location and design of light standards and wall fixtures shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Standard light poles with box fixtures shall not be considered decorative.

16. Plans submitted for plan check shall include complete photometric plan for the parking areas, drive aisles and open space areas to ensure that there are adequate levels of light within all portions of the parking, drive aisles and open space areas, adjacent properties and public rights of way to ensure proper public safety. All luminaries shall be designed, shielded, or aimed in such a manner so as not to produce glare upon adjacent properties or rights of way.

17. All parking areas and driveways shall be paved and striped in compliance with BPMC Section 19.436.070 (Residential Parking Dimensions and Layout) and Section

19.436.080 (Residential Parking Improvements) as shown on the approved plan. All landscaped areas shall be separated from adjacent vehicular areas by a masonry wall or portland cement concrete (p.c.c.) curb a minimum of 6 inches in height, or by p.c.c. or masonry walkway. It shall be the responsibility of the developer to submit to the Public Works Department such plans as are necessary to ensure the installation of curbs or walls do not detrimentally affect drainage.

18. A six-inch high poured-in-place wheel stop shall be provided for all open parking spaces, located three feet inside of the front boundary of the stalls.

19. A decorative stamped and colored concrete pavement shall be provided at the main driveways along Dale Street and La Palma Avenue. The decorative stamped and colored concrete pavement shall extend the full width of the driveway a minimum of 20 feet from the street property line.

20. All decorative crosswalks located within the property shall match the decorative stamped and colored pavement at the main driveway entries.

Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 September 24, 2024

21. A decorative metal screen fencing shall be provided to screen the utility closets located along Dale Street from public view. The decorative metal screen shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Division.

22. All rain gutters and downspouts shall be strategically located within the buildings to the maximum extent feasible and painted to match the colors of the building. Exact location of rain gutters and downspouts shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.

23. All roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not visible from adjacent and surrounding properties and streets from a height of five (5) feet above ground level. The installation and screening of air conditioning and similar equipment shall comply with existing design criteria and BPMC Section 19.340.020 (Visual Screening of Mechanical Equipment).

24. The proposed trash enclosures shall be in compliance with the Buena Park Municipal Code Section 19.424.010 (Trash Storage Facilities). Plans submitted for plan check shall include trash receptacles within the common open space areas. The design of the trash receptacles shall compliment the project.

25. Mailboxes shall be supplied, installed and designed to the approval of the Planning Division, with locations subject to the US Postal Service approval.

26. All signs including entry monument sign shall be subject to a separate review and approval by the Planning Division. All signs shall comply with BPMC Section

19.908.010 (Signs in Residential Zones).

27. Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&Rs), Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws for the homeowner’s association shall be reviewed and approved by City Staff prior to recordation and issuance of Certificate of Occupancy and shall include the following requirements:
a. CC&R’s shall include a restriction which prohibits illegal garage conversions and also require that all garages provide adequate vehicle access be maintained for the parking of two vehicles, unless otherwise permitted by law. b. Future room additions and expansion of balconies and patios shall not be permitted. c. Interior access to all rooms/areas of the townhome units shall be maintained at all times. No sections shall be partitioned off and provided solely with exterior access. In addition, no secondary kitchen or other cooking facilities shall be provided.
d. Modification to any wall or fence within the development, including the wall or fence height, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division, prior to building permit issuance.
e. The CC&R’s shall specifically dictate responsibilities between the homeowners association and private property owners for the maintenance, both interior and exterior, of all buildings, plumbing and electrical facilities.

Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 September 24, 2024

f. The CC&R’s shall establish provisions for all the parking areas to be maintained and clear of storage in order to maintain parking.
g. CC&R’s shall prohibit parking and any type of obstruction of the required fire access lanes and common area driveways.
h. The CC&R’s shall contain provisions establishing a fair, reasonable, and expeditious procedure for resolving disputes. The HOA shall establish and maintain a reserve fund consistent with the requirements of the Davis-Sterling Act. The CC&R shall include a maintenance schedule for common areas and equipment specifically when maintenance tasks will be performed. (ex. Painting, yard work, etc.)
i. The CC&R’s shall contain a requirement that the HOA file with the City of Buena Park Community Development Department the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the Association’s property management company and responsible property manager and each member of the Association Board, as of January 1st of each year.
j. Within a required vision clearance area there shall be no fence, tree, shrub, or other obstruction to sight between two feet and seven feet above the established street grade. Vision clearance areas shall be provided at any driveway entrance from or exit to a street: triangular areas on each side of the driveway measuring fifteen feet along the street property line and fifteen feet along the edge of the driveway from the point of intersection of the edge of the driveway with the street property line. k. All trees throughout the development shall be properly maintained in living condition and any damaged or diseased tree shall be replaced by the property owner. l. Balconies and porches shall not be used for storage. m. No vehicular gates or speed bumps within the fire lanes may be installed prior to City review and approval.

28. The Applicant shall provide the Planning Division proof of review and approval of the CC&R’s by the DRE prior to recordation. A copy of the recorded CC&R’s shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the release of utilities.

29. All required utility services and equipment, including transformers, gas meter, “J” boxes, and similar devices shall be located below grade, to the extent possible, or shall be screened from view by landscaping or ornamental decorative walls. The placement and treatment of all screening devices shall be subject to review and approval of the Planning Division. In addition to said walls, landscaping may also be required as a solution for screening. A preliminary electrical equipment plan, which is prepared by the Southern California Edison Company, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. The applicant is required to return City approved red line prints to the Southern California Edison Company Planning Department, for preparation of final construction drawings. The location of other utility companies’ appurtenances and meters shall be submitted to the City Planning Division for review and approval prior to installation.

Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 September 24, 2024

30. All required double detector check valve assemblies located within public view shall be located below grade to the extent possible or shall be screened from view by landscaping ornamental decorative walls. The placement and treatment of all screening devices shall be subject to review and approval of the Planning Division.

31. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits for each phase of the project or any succeeding residential development approval, all development impact fees associated with development including, but not limited to, park fees mandated by BPMC Section

18.64.080 (Park and recreational facilities dedications – Use of land fees) shall be paid in full.

32. The construction authorized by the Conditional Use Permit shall be started within one (1) year of the expiration of the appeal period and thereafter diligently advanced until completion of the project.

33. This approval may be revoked for any violation of noncompliance with any of these conditions in accordance with BPMC Section 19.132.030 (Revocation).

34. Prior to final inspection, these conditions and all improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City.

35. The project and/or use authorized by this approval shall at all times comply with all applicable local, state, and federal ordinances, statutes, standards, codes, laws, policies, and regulations.

36. The applicant and property owner shall sign a notarized Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of approval and return it to the Planning Division within thirty (30) days after the effective date of this approval or prior to the issuance of a building permit or certificate of occupancy, whichever may occur first.

37. The applicant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees from any claims and losses whatsoever occurring or resulting to any and all persons, firms, or corporations furnishing or supplying work, services, materials, or supplies in connection with the performance of the use permitted hereby or the exercise of the rights granted herein, any and all claims, lawsuits or actions arising from the granting of or exercise of the rights permitted by this approval and from any and all claims and losses occurring or resulting to any person, firm, or corporation, or property damage, injury, or death arising out of or connected with the performance of the use permitted hereby. Applicant’s obligation to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City as stated hereinabove shall include, but not be limited to, paying all fees and costs incurred by legal counsel of the City’s choice in representing the City in connection with any such claims, losses, lawsuits, or actions, and any award of such damages, judgments, verdicts, court costs or attorneys’ fees in any such lawsuit or action.

Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 September 24, 2024

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24
th day of September 2024 by the following called vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS:
_________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
City Clerk
Resolution No.

Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 September 24, 2024

AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE:

I/ We do hereby accept all of the conditions contained in this document and all other conditions imposed by Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1 and do agree that I/We shall conform with and abide by all such conditions.

Date:

Printed Name and Signature
Owner / Applicant
RESOLUTION NO.

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. MND-24-2

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BUENA

PARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION NO. MND-24-2 FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO.

GP-23-1, ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-23-1, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. TT24-1, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CU-24-1, TO DEVELOP A 93-UNIT TOWNHOME PROJECT WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING AND
SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8030 DALE STREET (APN: 070-501-01)
WEHREAS, Christopher Courtney of Brandywine Homes, (“Applicant”), 2355 Main Street, Suite 220, Irvine, CA 92614, on behalf of Perge Ventures, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, property owner, 13000 E. Firestone Boulevard, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 has filed a request for General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1, Zone Change No. Z-23-1, Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1, and Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1, to develop a 93-unit townhome community with associated parking and site improvements at 8030 Dale Street, Buena Park, California, 90620 (APN: 070-501-01) in the County of Orange (collectively, the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, an Initial Environmental Study for the Project was prepared pursuant to Section 15060 (Preliminary Review) of the State Guidelines based on the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA [California Public Resources Code Section 21000 et.

Seq.]). Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Article 6 (Negative Declaration Process) Section 15070 (Decision to prepare a negative or mitigated negative declaration), and based on the information contained in the Initial Study, a decision was made to prepare a Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) for the project. The City contracted with an independent consultant, Sagecrest Planning and Environmental, for the preparation of the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and
WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) with associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program was prepared pursuant to the State CEQA Guidelines (California Administrative Code Section 15000 et. seq.) and local procedures adopted pursuant thereto; and
WHEREAS, on July 19, 2024, a Notice of Intent (NOI) to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was filed and the MND was forwarded to interested persons, organizations, and agencies; and
WHEREAS, the public comment period for the draft MND began on July 19, 2024 and was lawfully closed on August 19, 2024; and
WHEREAS, on August 28, 2024, the Planning Commission of the City of Buena Park held a duly noticed public hearing to consider a recommendation to the City Council to approve General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1, Zone Change No. Z-23-1, Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1, Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1, and associated Mitigated Resolution No.

Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2
September 24, 2024

Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2. Said public hearing was concluded prior to adoption of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, on September 24, 2024, the City Council of the City of Buena Park, held a duly noticed public hearing to consider approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2 for associated General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1, Zone Change No.

Z-23-1, Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1, Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1. Said public hearing was concluded prior to adoption of the Resolution; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this resolution have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BUENA PARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. All of the facts set forth in the Recitals of this Resolution, are true and correct and hereby incorporated by this reference.

Section 2. The City Council finds the Initial Study prepared by the City of Buena Park and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2 and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is legally adequate. With the implementation of the associated Mitigation Measures discussed in the MND, the potential significant environmental impacts can be reduced to levels of insignificance based on the standards discussed in the MND.

Section 3. The City Council finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program identified all significant environmental effects of the Project; there are no potentially significant environmental impacts not addressed in the Final draft MND.

Section 4. The Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain potential construction-related environmental effects that may result from the Project, however, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been included that would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to less than significant.

Section 5. The City Council adopts the attached Mitigated Negative Declaration MND-24-2 and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and certifies that the MND for General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1, Zone Change No. Z23-1, Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1, Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1, has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and local procedures adopted pursuant thereto, and has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration.

Section 6. The City Council certifies the completion of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2 and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for General Plan Amendment No. GP-23-1, Zone Change No. Z-23-1, Tentative Tract Map No. TT-24-1, Conditional Use Permit No. CU-24-1. The City of Buena Park shall file a Notice of Determination (NOD) with the County Clerk of Orange County and the Secretary Resolution No.

Mitigated Negative Declaration No. MND-24-2
September 24, 2024

of the Resources Agency pursuant to the provisions of Section 21152 of Public Resources Code and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15075 adopted pursuant thereof.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 24
th day of September 2024 by the following
called vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS:
_________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:

City Clerk
I, Adria M. Jimenez, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Buena Park, California, herby certify that the Foregoing resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Buena Park, held this 24 th day of September
2024.

City Clerk
ATTACHMENT 5
Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration with Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
https://www.buenapark.com/city_departments/community_development/planning_division/8 030_Dale_Street.php
A0.0 COVER SHEET SHEET INDEX A0.0 COVER SHEET 1 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 3 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 4 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN A0.1 STREET SCENE A0.2 STREET SCENE A0.10 BUILDING AREA CALCS A1.0 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN A1.1 OPEN AREA EXHIBIT A1.2 COMMON USEABLE OPEN AREA EXHIBIT A1.3 LADDERING EXHIBIT A2.0 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A2.1 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A2.2 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A2.3 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A2.4 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A2.5 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A2.6 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A2.7 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A2.8 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A3.0 BUILDING PLANS A3.1 BUILDING PLANS A3.2 BUILDING PLANS A3.3 BUILDING PLANS A3.4 BUILDING PLANS A3.5 BUILDING PLANS A3.6 BUILDING PLANS A3.7 BUILDING PLANS A4.0 SITE SECTIONS A5.0 UNIT PLANS A5.1 UNIT PLANS A5.2 UNIT PLANS A5.3 UNIT PLANS A5.4 UNIT PLANS A6.0 COLOR AND MATERIAL BOARDS L-01 OVERALL LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN L-02 OPEN SPACE ENLARGEMENTS L-03 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT IMAGES L-04 WALL AND FENCE CONCEPT PLAN Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 PROJECT TEAM Developer: Brandywine Homes Chris Courtney 2355 Main Street, Suite 220 Irvine, CA 92614 949-264-8842 Architect: KTGY Bryan Sevy 17911 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92614 949-850-2133 Civil: C & V Engineering Dane McDougall 9830 Irvine Center Drive Irvine, CA 92619 949-916-3800 Landscape Architect: Weiland Design Group, Inc. Kim Takaki 28924 Old Town Front Street, Suite 202 Temecula, CA 92590 SITE SUMMARY Legal Description: LOT 52 OF TRACT NO. 2629, IN THE CITY OF BUENA PARK, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 87, PAGES 18, 19 AND 20 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. APN: 070-501-01 Project Address: 8030 Dale Street Current Zoning: Community Shopping (CS) Proposed Zoning: RM-20 CU-24-1 RECEIVED JUL 3 2024 PLANNING DIV A (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G
(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN
(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN
(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN A A A A A A A A A A A A A A0.1 STREET SCENE Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 DAY RENDER NIGHT RENDER RENDER VIEW A (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G
(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN
(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN
(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN A A A A A A A A A A A A A A0.2 STREET SCENE Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 DAY RENDER NIGHT RENDER RENDER VIEW A0.10 BUILDING AREA CALCS CRC TOWNS AREAS UNIT TYPE FLOOR AREAS NOTE: BUILDING AREAS WERE BUILDINGS WERE R2/U OCCUPANIES WERE CALCULATED USING VALUES FROM CBC TABLE 506.2 FOR OCCUPANCIES R2 (DWELLING UNIT - 7,000 S.F PER STORY) AND U (PRIVATE GARAGE - 16,500 S.F.) AND CBC SECTION 506.2.2 MIXED-OCCUPANCY BUILDINGS. NOTE: CRC TOWNS ARE PERMITTED UNLIMITED BUILDING AREAS. R2 / U CONDOMINIUM BUILDING AREAS Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 15, 2024 ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT PER CBC TABLE 506.2 FOR OCCUPANCIES R2 (DWELLING UNIT - 7,000 S.F PER STORY) AND U (PRIVATE GARAGE - 16,500 S.F.) AND CBC SECTION 506.2.2 MIXED-OCCUPANCY BUILDINGS. PER CBC TABLE 504.3 and 504.4 FOR OCCUPANCIES R2 TYPE VB NFPA 13 AND R3 CRC TOWNS NOTE: A fire alarm system is not required for R-2 residential with a nfpa sprinkler (per section 907.2.9 of the building code)

A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

DALE STREET LA PALMA AVE
65G 65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN
65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G 20' 63'-8" 20'-1"
15'-3" 20'-4" 12'
20'-8"
12'-1" 25'-0" 24'-0" 20'-6" 46'-0"
15'-4" 18'-0"
30'-3" 10C 11C 12C 13C1F 5G14G 6F 8B 9C 4D 3E 2E 7A
24'-0" 24' 24'-0" 24'-0" 24'-0"
24'-0" 14' 14' 11'-6" 11'-6" 25'-2" A1.0 SITE PLAN 0 15 30 60 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 9, 2024 1A Building Number Building Type Unit Number Plan Type 5 1 27 10 11 7 10 10 11 10 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 1212 12 12 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 11 5 13 3 11 11 41111 11 11 1111 11 496 Site Summary Site Area: 3.87 Acres; 168,536 sf Dwelling Units: 93 Units Net Density: 24 du/ac Product Type: 2 & 3 Story Townhomes Occupancy Type: R2 Construction Type: Residential: Type VB Sprinkler Type: NFPA 13 Building Height: 38' Lot Coverage: ±69,014 sf (41%) Total Building Area: ±187,534 sf Building Setbacks: Required Proposed Front (Dale Street): 19' 15' Min. Street Side (La Palma): 19' 15' Min. Rear (East): 10' 12' at 2 story, 20' at 3 story Side (South): 10' 15' at 2 story, 20' at 3 story Unit Summary Plan Type Garage Stories Net Area # 1 2 bd/2.5 ba Side by Side 3 1,233 sf 7 Du 1x 2 bd/2.5 ba Tandem 3 1,222 sf 4 Du 2 2 bd/2.5 ba Tandem 3 1,319 sf 28 Du 3 3 bd/2.5 ba Side by Side 2 1,419 sf 6 Du 4 3 bd/2.5 ba Side by Side 3 1,502 sf 7 Du 4x 3 bd/2.5 ba Tandem 3 1,531 sf 4 Du 5 3 bd/3.5 ba Side by Side 3 1,556 sf 9 Du 6 3 bd/3.5 ba Side by Side 3 1,701 sf 28 Du Total 93 Du Parking Summary:* *Per AB 2097, no minimum parking required for projects within a half-mile radius of a major transit stop. For comparison, the parking standard per State Density Bonus Law would be: 2 Bed: 39 Du x 1.5 Sp/Unit: 59 Spaces 3 Bed: 54 Du x 1.5 Sp/Unit: 81 Spaces Total Spaces: 140 Spaces (1.5/Unit) Parking Provided: Private Garages: 186 Spaces Open Parking: 26 Spaces Total: 212 Spaces (2.28/Unit) Legend 1. Property Line 2. Parking Space - 9'x18' 3. Accessible Parking Space 4. Trash Enclosure 5. Accessible Path of Travel 6. Accessible Ground Floor Unit 7. Decorative Paving (Stamped Concrete or equal) Density Bonus Calculation: Site Area=3.87 Acres x 24 du/ac = 92 13% moderate affordable income provided, allows 8% density bonus 8% of 92.928 = 7.43 additional units 92.928+7.43 =100.36 du ≈100 du Allowable Open Space Summary: Open Area - See Sheet A1.1 Required Total Open Area: 67,414 sf (40% Min.) Provided Open Area: 53,688 sf (31.1%) Common Usable Open Area - See Sheet A1.2 Required: 12,300 sf Provided: 32,822 sf Utility Notes: 1. Control exterior electrical and hose bibs with appropriate metal locking covers and padlocks. 2. Individual sub-meters for water provided at each unit. 3. Electric meters and fire riser cabinets at each building- See keynote 11. 4. Gas service is not provided. 5. For additional utility information, refer to Civil Sheet 4 of 4. 8. Affordable Units 9. Transformers 10. AC Condensers 11. Electrical Cabinet and Fire Riser 12. Existing Driveway to be Removed 13. Turning Path of a Toyota 4Runner 14. Proposed Raised Landscape Median 14 14 A (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN A A A A A A A A A A A A A

DALE STREET LA PALMA AVE
20' 63'-8" 20'-1"
15'-3" 20'-4" 12'
20'-8"
12'-1" 25'-0" 24'-0" 20'-6" 46'-0"
15'-4" 18'-0"
30'-3" 10C 11C 12C 13C1F 5G14G 6F 8B 9C 4D 3E 2E 7A
24'-0" 24' 24'-0" 24'-0" 24'-0"
24'-0" 14' 14' 11'-6" 11'-6" 25'-2" A1.1 OPEN AREA EXHIBIT 0 15 30 60 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 La Palma Ave Dale Street Open Area Site Area: 168,536 sf Required Total Open Area: 40% Min= 67,414 sf Provided Private Open Area: 10583 sf (6.3%) Provided Common Open Area: 43,105 sf (25.6%) Total Open Area: 53,688 sf (31.9%) A (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN A A A A A A A A A A A A A DALE STREET LA PALMA AVE 63'-7" 20'-7"
15'-2" 20'-2" 11'-11"
20'-8"
12'-1" 24' 20'-6" 46'-0"
15'-4" 18'-0"
30'-6" 11'
12'-1"
11'-7" 11'-6" 10C 11C 12C 13C1F 5G14G 6F 8B 9C 4D 3E 2E 7A A1.2 COMMON USABLE OPEN AREA 0 15 30 60 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 La Palma Ave Dale Street Common Usable Open Area Required: at least two hundred square feet per dwelling unit for the first twenty dwelling units, plus one hundred fifty square feet per dwelling unit for the next twenty dwelling units, plus one hundred square feet per dwelling unit for each additional dwelling unit. 93 du =20+20+53 du =200(20)+150(20)+100(53) =12,300 sf (min 10'x10'): Provided: 32,822 sf A (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN A A A A A A A A A A A A A

DALE STREET LA PALMA AVE
4'
4'
20' 63'-8" 20'-1"
15'-3" 20'-4" 12'
20'-8"
12'-1" 25'-0" 24'-0" 20'-6" 46'-0"
15'-4" 18'-0"
30'-3" 10C 11C 12C 13C1F 5G14G 6F 8B 9C 4D 3E 2E 7A
24'-0" 24' 24'-0" 24'-0" 24'-0"
24'-0" 14' 14' 11'-6" 11'-6" 25'-2" 3'-0"6'-10"
3'-0" 6'-10" 3'-0" laddering pad4'-9 1/2"
14'-0"
23'-10" A1.3 LADDERING EXHIBIT 0 15 30 60 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 La Palma Ave Dale Street SITE PLAN LEGEND LADDER PAD SETBACK AT RESCUE OPENINGS. SEE LADDERING PAD DETAILS PER OCFA E-04 1A Building Number Building Type Unit Number Plan Type d=(h/5)+2 4.8'=(14/5)+2 6.77'=(23'-10"/5)+2 Right Elevation Left Elevation 4 7 5 6
9'-1" 8'-6" 10 8 1 2 39'-1" Roof Plan Scale: 1/16"=1'-0" 11 4:12 4:12 4:12
4:12 Front Elevation Rear Elevation MATERIAL LEGEND 1. Concrete S-Tile Roof 2. Stucco 3. Stucco Over Foam Trim 4. Garage Doors 5. Iron Railing 6. Light Fixture 7. Vinyl Windows 8. Shutters 9. Gable Accents 10. Entry Door 11. Stucco Over Foam Corbels 12. Awning 9 2 12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12
30' Max to Eave
33'-10" 3:12
4:12 4:12
4:12 4:12 Perimeter wall per landscape Patio wall per landscape A2.0 ELEVATIONS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING A Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 Right Elevation Left Elevation Roof Plan Scale: 1/16"=1'-0" Front Elevation Rear Elevation MATERIAL LEGEND 1. Concrete S-Tile Roof 2. Stucco 3. Stucco Over Foam Trim 4. Garage Doors 5. Iron Railing 6. Light Fixture 7. Vinyl Windows 8. Shutters 9. Gable Accents 10. Entry Door 11. Stucco Over Foam Corbels 12. Awning 4 75 10 6 8 1 2 3 11 9 2 12 9'-1" 8'-6" 9'-1" 4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12
33'-10"
30' Max to Eave 3:12 3:12
4:12 4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 Perimeter wall per landscape Perimeter wall per landscape Patio wall per landscape A2.1 ELEVATIONS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING B Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 Right Elevation Left Elevation Roof Plan Scale: 1/16"=1'-0" Front Elevation Rear Elevation MATERIAL LEGEND 1. Concrete S-Tile Roof 2. Stucco 3. Stucco Over Foam Trim 4. Garage Doors 5. Iron Railing 6. Light Fixture 7. Vinyl Windows 8. Shutters 9. Gable Accents 10. Entry Door 11. Stucco Over Foam Corbels 12. Awning 4 7 5 10 6 8 12 1 3 211 9 3 9'-1" 8'-6" 9'-1"
4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12
37'-7"
30' Max to Eave
4:12
4:12 Perimeter wall per landscape
29'-6" 2 A2.2 ELEVATIONS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING C Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 Right Elevation (enhanced) Left Elevation Roof Plan Scale: 1/16"=1'-0" Front Elevation Rear Elevation MATERIAL LEGEND 1. Concrete S-Tile Roof 2. Stucco 3. Stucco Over Foam Trim 4. Garage Doors 5. Iron Railing 6. Light Fixture 7. Vinyl Windows 8. Shutters 9. Gable Accents 10. Entry Door 11. Stucco Over Foam Corbels 12. Awning 4 7 5 10 6 8 2 1 2 3 11 9 9'-1" 8'-6" 9'-1" 4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12
37'-7"
30' Max to Eave
4:12
4:12
29'-6" Perimeter wall per landscape 12 A2.3 ELEVATIONS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING D Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 Right Elevation Left Elevation Roof Plan Scale: 1/16"=1'-0" Front Elevation Rear Elevation MATERIAL LEGEND 1. Concrete S-Tile Roof 2. Stucco 3. Stucco Over Foam Trim 4. Garage Doors 5. Iron Railing 6. Light Fixture 7. Vinyl Windows 8. Shutters 9. Gable Accents 10. Entry Door 11. Stucco Over Foam Corbels 12. Awning 4 7 5 10 6 8 2 1 2 3 11 9 9'-1" 8'-6" 9'-1" 4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12
37'-7" 4:12
30' Max to Eave 12 A2.4 ELEVATIONS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING E Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 Right Enhanced Elevation @ bldg #2 Facing Dale Street Left Enhanced Elevation @ bldg #3 Facing drive aisle entry from La Palma Avenue A2.5 ELEVATIONS BUILDING E ENHANCED Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 0 4 8 16 Right Elevation Left Elevation Roof Plan Scale: 1/16"=1'-0" Front Elevation Rear Elevation MATERIAL LEGEND 1. Concrete S-Tile Roof 2. Stucco 3. Stucco Over Foam Trim 4. Garage Doors 5. Iron Railing 6. Light Fixture 7. Vinyl Windows 8. Shutters 9. Gable Accents 10. Entry Door 11. Stucco Over Foam Corbels 12. Awning 4 7 5 10 6 8 2 1 2 3 11 9 9'-1" 8'-6" 9'-1"
37'-7" 4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12
4:124:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12
4:12 4:12
30' Max to Eave A2.6 ELEVATIONS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING F Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 Right Enhanced Elevation @ bldg #1 Facing drive aisle entry from Dale Street Left Enhanced Elevation @ bldg #1 Facing corner of La Palma Avenue and Dale Street A2.7 ELEVATIONS BUILDING F ENHANCED Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 0 4 8 16 Front Elevation Right Elevation Rear Elevation Left Elevation MATERIAL LEGEND 1. Concrete S-Tile Roof 2. Stucco 3. Stucco Over Foam Trim 4. Garage Doors 5. Iron Railing 6. Light Fixture 7. Vinyl Windows 8. Shutters 9. Gable Accents 10. Entry Door 11. Stucco Over Foam Corbels 12. Awning Roof Plan Scale: 1/16"=1'-0" 4 7 5 10 6 8 1 3 11 2 9 2 9'-1" 8'-6" 9'-1" 4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12
4:12
4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12
37'-7" 4:12
30' Max to Eave
4:12
4:12 A2.8 ELEVATIONS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING G Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 36'-6"
87'-0" 38'-6"
84'-6" 38'-0"
84'-6" First Floor Building A Second Floor Building A Third Floor Building A P5P5P5P5 P5P5P5P5 P5P5P5P5 Building A AWNING ABOVE TYP., 4'X6' CLEAR TYP., Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 A3.0 BUILDING PLANS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING A CU-24-1 RECEIVED JUL 3 2024 PLANNING DIV 36'-6"
108'-2" 38'-6"
105'-8" 38'-0"
105'-8" First Floor Building B Second Floor Building B Third Floor Building B P5P5P5P5 P5P5P5P5 P5P5P5P5P5 P5 P5 Building B AWNING ABOVE TYP., 4'X6' CLEAR TYP., Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 A3.1 BUILDING PLANS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING B P4 P1 P4 P3 P3 P1 49'-0"
83'-8" 51'-0"
84'-8" 51'-0"
63'-6" First Floor Building C Second Floor Building C Third Floor Building C P6 P2 P6 P2 P6 P2 P4 P1 Building C Roof Below 4'X6' CLEAR TYP., CANOPY ABOVE TYP., AWNING ABOVE TYP., ROOF OVERHANG ABOVE Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 A3.2 BUILDING PLANS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING C First Floor Building D Second Floor Building D Third Floor Building D P3 P3 49'-0" 120'-6" 49'-0"
118'-0" 47'-0"
96'-10" P2P2P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 Building D Roof Below AWNING ABOVE TYP., 4'X6' CLEAR TYP., CANOPY ABOVE TYP., Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 A3.3 BUILDING PLANS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING D 46'-0"
131'-8" 48'-0"
129'-2" 47'-0"
129'-2" First Floor Building E Second Floor Building E Third Floor Building E P2 P2 P2 P6 P6 P6 P2 P2 P2 P6 P6 P6 P2 P2 P2 P6 P6 P6 P2 P2 P2 P6 P6 P6 Building E AWNING ABOVE TYP., 4'X6' CLEAR TYP., CANOPY ABOVE TYP., Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 A3.4 BUILDING PLANS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING E 47'-0"
125'-8" 51'-0"
127'-2" 51'-0"
127'-2" First Floor Building F Second Floor Building F Third Floor Building F P4X P1X P1 P4 P1 P4 P2 P2 P2 P6 P6 P6 P2 P2 P2 P6 P6 P6 P4 P1 P1 P4 P4 P1 Building F AWNING ABOVE TYP., 4'X6' CLEAR TYP., CANOPY ABOVE TYP., ROOF OVERHANG ABOVE ROOF OVERHANG ABOVE Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 A3.5 BUILDING PLANS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING F 51'-0" 160'-6"
47'-0" 160'-0" First Floor Building G Second Floor Building G P2 P2 P6 P6 P1X-1 P1 P4X-1 P4 P2 P2 P6 P6 P2 P2 P6 P6 P2 P2 P6 P6 Building G CANOPY ABOVE TYP., 4'X6' CLEAR TYP., AWNING ABOVE TYP., ROOF OVERHANG ABOVE Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 A3.6 BUILDING PLANS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING G 51'-0" 160'-6" Third Floor Building G P2P6 P2 P2 P2 P1 P4 P6 P6 P6 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 A3.7 BUILDING PLANS 0 4 8 16 BUILDING G A (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G
(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN
(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN A A A A A A A A A A A A A

DALE STREET LA PALMA AVE
4'
4' 22 1 1 Section 1 Section 2 ⅊ Private Drive Existing Residential Line of Sight Existing Residential ⅊ Line of Sight Entry Drive Plan 5 Building A Plan 1 Plan 2 Plan 6 Plan 3 Building C ±20'-8" ±20'-0" ±12'-0" ±26'-0" ±37'-10"
±29'-5"
17'-0"
±34'-9"
26'-10"
17'-0" Front Elevation Building A Left Elevation Building C Perimeter wall per landscape Perimeter wall per landscape 6'-6" 2'-6" 205 CF Total Overhead Storage 4'x8'x2.5'=80 CF 5'-6"
6'-0"
6'-0" A4.0 BUILDING SECTIONS 0 4 8 16 Key Map 1"=80' Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 Entry Dn. Great Room 14'-1"x13'-1" Garage 20'-2"x21'-2" Balcony 13'-10"x6'-4" 87 SQ. FT. Lau. Kitchen Up W.I.C. Primary Bedroom 12'-8"x13'-7" Bath 2 Dn. Bed 2 10'-7"x11'-11" Entry Up Garage 10'-9"x46'-3" Up 29'-2" 29'-2" 30'-2" 23'-11"
21'-11"
23'-11" 16'-1"
47'-0" Third Floor Second Floor First Floor- Plan 1 First Floor-Plan 1x Coat Dining Room 9'-7"x16'-5" Primary Bath PLAN 1x NET S.F. 2 BR/2.5 BA 1ST FLOOR 93 SQ. FT. 2ND FLOOR 547 SQ. FT. 3RD FLOOR 582 SQ. FT. TOTAL LIVING 1222 SQ. FT. GARAGE 541 SQ. FT. PLAN 1 NET S.F. 2 BR/2.5 BA 1ST FLOOR 104 SQ. FT. 2ND FLOOR 547 SQ. FT. 3RD FLOOR 582 SQ. FT. TOTAL LIVING 1233 SQ. FT. GARAGE 507 SQ. FT. W.I.C Storage
200 CF Storage 205 CF 205 CF Total 20'-2" 10'-9" 8'-2"x3'-5" 28 SQ. FT. 4x6' CLR. 4x6' CLR. applies to Plan 1 and 1x applies to Plan 1 and 1x Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 A5.0 PLAN 1 & 1X FLOOR PLANS 0 2 4 8 Coat Low Roof Second Floor First Floor EntryGreat Room 15'-1"x16'-8" Primary Bedroom 14'-7"x12'-10" Bed 2 10'-1"x10'-4" Garage 20'-5"x20'-4" Pwdr. Bath 2 Primary Bath Lau. Kitchen Bed 3 10'-1"x11'-6" DN UP 49'-0" 21'-0"
47'-0" 21'-0" Lin. PLAN 3 NET S.F. 3 BR/2.5 BA 1ST FLOOR 538 SQ. FT. 2ND FLOOR 881 SQ. FT. TOTAL LIVING 1419 SQ. FT. GARAGE 443 SQ. FT. W.H. W.I.C Pantry Lin. Storage 200 CF 200 CF Total 20'-4" 4x6' CLR. 4x6' CLR. A5.1 PLAN 3 FLOOR PLANS 0 2 4 8 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 Entry Dn. Great Room 17'-11"x20'-8" Garage 20'-4"x24'-4" Balcony 11'-3"x11'-2" 124 SQ. FT. Lau. Kitchen Up Primary Bedroom 13'-4"x10'-9" Bath 2 Bed 3 10'-8"x10'-4" Entry Up Garage 10'-4"x39'-7" Up 31'-2" 31'-2" 28'-2" 26'-11"
24'-11"
26'-11" 14'-5"
47'-0" Bed 2 10'-8"x10'-1" Pwdr. Third Floor Second Floor First Floor - Plan 4 First Floor - Plan 4x Elec. Cab Coat Coat Lin. Primary Bath PLAN 4x NET S.F. 3 BR/2.5 BA 1ST FLOOR 163 SQ. FT. 2ND FLOOR 651 SQ. FT. 3RD FLOOR 717 SQ. FT. TOTAL LIVING 1531 SQ. FT. GARAGE 482 SQ. FT. PLAN 4 NET S.F. 3 BR/2.5 BA 1ST FLOOR 134 SQ. FT. 2ND FLOOR 651 SQ. FT. 3RD FLOOR 717 SQ. FT. TOTAL LIVING 1502 SQ. FT. GARAGE 533 SQ. FT. W.I.C Dn. 10'-4" Storage 200CF 200CF Total Storage 270 CF 270 CF Total 20'-4" 17'-6"x2'-2" 38 SQ. FT. 4x6' CLR. 4x6' CLR. applies to Plan 4 and 4x applies to Plan 4 and 4x 8'-0" A5.2 PLAN 4 & 4X FLOOR PLANS Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 Primary Bath Second Floor First Floor
36'-6" 21'-0" PLAN 5 NET S.F. 3 BR/3.5 BA 1ST FLOOR 287 SQ. FT. 2ND FLOOR 673 SQ. FT. 3RD FLOOR 596 SQ. FT. TOTAL LIVING 1556 SQ. FT. GARAGE 454 SQ. FT. 21'-0" Third Floor 21'-0" 38'-0"
38'-6" Garage 20'-5"x20'-4" Bed 3 10'-1"x10'-2" Bed 2 10'-6"x10'-7" Primary Bedroom 13'-0"x12'-6" W.I.C Entry Up Bath 3 Bath 2 DN DN Lau. Lin. Great Room 12'-9"x11'-10" Kitchen Pwdr. Pantry Coat Up Dining 16'-10"x9'-11" W.H. Storage 125 CF 205 CF Total Overhead Storage 4'x8'x2.5'=80CF 205 CF Total 20'-4" Balcony 9'-6"x7'-5" 70 SQ. FT. 4x6' CLR. Canopy above A5.3 PLAN 5 FLOOR PLANS Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 0 2 4 8 Dn. Coat Second Floor First FloorEntry Bed 3 10'-9"x10'-4" Primary Bedroom 13'-0"x13'-5" Bed 2 10'-6"x11'-8" Garage 10'-8"x40'-2" Bath 3 Bath 2 Kitchen Dn. 46'-0" Plan 2 11'-3"
Plan 6
25'-7" 32'-2" Lin. PLAN 2 NET S.F. 2 BR/2.5 BA 1ST FLOOR 128 SQ. FT. 2ND FLOOR 611 SQ. FT. 3RD FLOOR 580 SQ. FT. TOTAL LIVING 1319 SQ. FT. GARAGE 454 SQ. FT. W.H. W.I.C Plan 6 20'-9" PLAN 6 NET S.F. 3 BR/3.5 BA 1ST FLOOR 380 SQ. FT. 2ND FLOOR 652 SQ. FT. 3RD FLOOR 669 SQ. FT. TOTAL LIVING 1701 SQ. FT. GARAGE 441 SQ. FT. Third Floor Entry 32'-2" Primary Bedroom 12'-3"x13'-5" Bed 2 10'-6"x10'-10" Primary Bath W.I.C Great Room 13'-4"x12'-9" Dining 12'-9"x10'-5" Great Room 15'-2"x14'-5" Dining 9'-4"x18'-3" Bath 2Lau. Lau. Kitchen Garage 20'-2"x20'-8" W.H. 48'-0"
Plan 2
22'-3"
Plan 6
25'-7"
47'-0"
Plan 2
21'-3" Storage Coat Lin. Dn. Pwdr. Pwdr. Up DN Up Storage 160 CF 240 CF Total Overhead Storage 4'x8'x2.5'=80CF 240 CF Total Storage 200CF 200 CF Total 40'-2" 16RUP 16RUP PLAN 6 PLAN 2 PLAN 6PLAN 2 PLAN 6 PLAN 2 Balcony 5'-2"x12'-11" 67 SQ. FT. Balcony 5'-2"x15'-11" 82 SQ. FT. 4x6' CLR. 4x6' CLR. A5.4 PLAN 2 & 6 FLOOR PLANS 0 2 4 8 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 1, 2024 A6.0 COLOR AND MATERIAL BOARD

SEATING AND BBQ

ALUMAWOOD TRELLIS & TRASH ENCLOSURE

BIKE RACK
SCALE: SEE SHEET
09/30/24
EXP. DATE

SIGNATURE
LLA 5508
O
I NR
I
L I
PE C N
C
A
C
M TAKA
07/03/24 BRANDYWINE HOMES CITY OF BUENA PARK, CA DALE AND LA PALMA ENTITLEMENT PLANS 28924 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET, SUITE 202 TEMECULA, CA 92590 P (844) WEILAND, XT 701 F (619) 675-3426 EMAIL - [email protected] CORPORATE OFFICE 291 SIERRA WAVE SWALL MEADOWS, CA 93514 DATE: 07/03/2024
JOB # 23-040a
DRAWN: KT, BB, YH
0/0/2024, 02/07/2024, 04/8/24, 04/24/24, 05/03/24, 07/02/24, 07/03/24 O
C A L
E
SED L
I
S
T
ET
I
SHEET:

OF 4 REVISIONS DATE
DATE
A
F
F
ETATS
A
C
N
H
D A
R
I K
K
WEILAND DESIGN GROUP, INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING + CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 3 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT IMAGES

TREE OPTIONS
Arbutus 'Marina' /
Marina Strawberry Tree
Lyonothamnus f. ssp. a. /
Fern-Leaf Catalina Ironwood
Lophostemon confertus
/ Brisbane Box
Bauhinia sp. /
Orchid Tree
GinNgo biloba /
Maidenhair Tree
Platanus racemosa /
California Sycamore
Ulmus parYifolia /
Chinese Elm
Lagerstroemia indica /
Crape Myrtle
Magnolia grandiflora /
Southern Magnolia
Washingtonia
filifera /
California Fan
Palm

PLAY EQUIPMENT
Heteromeles arbutifolia /
Toyon

WALL AND FENCING
NOTE: IMAGES PROVIDED HEREIN ARE CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE.

Cercis occidentalis /
Western Redbud
Tristaniopsis laurina /
Water Gum
Prunus caroliniana /
Carolina Cherry Laurel
Laurus 'Saratoga' /
Saratoga Laurel
Prunus i. ssp. lyonii
/ Catalina Cherry
Syagrus r. /
Queen Palm
L-03

A A A A A A A A A A A A A A

DALE STREET LA PALMA AVE
65G 65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN
65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G 20' 63'-8" 20'-1"
15'-3" 20'-4" 12'
20'-8"
12'-1" 25'-0" 24'-0" 20'-6" 46'-0"
15'-4" 18'-0"
30'-3" 10C 11C 12C 13C1F 5G14G 6F 8B 9C 4D 3E 2E 7A
24'-0" 24' 24'-0" 24'-0" 24'-0"
24'-0" 14' 14' 11'-6" 11'-6" 25'-2" A1.0 SITE PLAN 0 15 30 60 Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com DALE AND LA PALMA BUENA PARK, CA #2023-0806 SCHEMATIC DESIGN JULY 9, 2024 1A Building Number Building Type Unit Number Plan Type 5 1 27 10 11 7 10 10 11 10 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 1212 12 12 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 11 5 13 3 11 11 41111 11 11 1111 11 496 Site Summary Site Area: 3.87 Acres; 168,536 sf Dwelling Units: 93 Units Net Density: 24 du/ac Product Type: 2 & 3 Story Townhomes Occupancy Type: R2 Construction Type: Residential: Type VB Sprinkler Type: NFPA 13 Building Height: 38' Lot Coverage: ±69,014 sf (41%) Total Building Area: ±187,534 sf Building Setbacks: Required Proposed Front (Dale Street): 19' 15' Min. Street Side (La Palma): 19' 15' Min. Rear (East): 10' 12' at 2 story, 20' at 3 story Side (South): 10' 15' at 2 story, 20' at 3 story Unit Summary Plan Type Garage Stories Net Area # 1 2 bd/2.5 ba Side by Side 3 1,233 sf 7 Du 1x 2 bd/2.5 ba Tandem 3 1,222 sf 4 Du 2 2 bd/2.5 ba Tandem 3 1,319 sf 28 Du 3 3 bd/2.5 ba Side by Side 2 1,419 sf 6 Du 4 3 bd/2.5 ba Side by Side 3 1,502 sf 7 Du 4x 3 bd/2.5 ba Tandem 3 1,531 sf 4 Du 5 3 bd/3.5 ba Side by Side 3 1,556 sf 9 Du 6 3 bd/3.5 ba Side by Side 3 1,701 sf 28 Du Total 93 Du Parking Summary:* *Per AB 2097, no minimum parking required for projects within a half-mile radius of a major transit stop. For comparison, the parking standard per State Density Bonus Law would be: 2 Bed: 39 Du x 1.5 Sp/Unit: 59 Spaces 3 Bed: 54 Du x 1.5 Sp/Unit: 81 Spaces Total Spaces: 140 Spaces (1.5/Unit) Parking Provided: Private Garages: 186 Spaces Open Parking: 26 Spaces Total: 212 Spaces (2.28/Unit) Legend 1. Property Line 2. Parking Space - 9'x18' 3. Accessible Parking Space 4. Trash Enclosure 5. Accessible Path of Travel 6. Accessible Ground Floor Unit 7. Decorative Paving (Stamped Concrete or equal) Density Bonus Calculation: Site Area=3.87 Acres x 24 du/ac = 92 13% moderate affordable income provided, allows 8% density bonus 8% of 92.928 = 7.43 additional units 92.928+7.43 =100.36 du ≈100 du Allowable Open Space Summary: Open Area - See Sheet A1.1 Required Total Open Area: 67,414 sf (40% Min.) Provided Open Area: 53,688 sf (31.1%) Common Usable Open Area - See Sheet A1.2 Required: 12,300 sf Provided: 32,822 sf Utility Notes: 1. Control exterior electrical and hose bibs with appropriate metal locking covers and padlocks. 2. Individual sub-meters for water provided at each unit. 3. Electric meters and fire riser cabinets at each building- See keynote 11. 4. Gas service is not provided. 5. For additional utility information, refer to Civil Sheet 4 of 4. 8. Affordable Units 9. Transformers 10. AC Condensers 11. Electrical Cabinet and Fire Riser 12. Existing Driveway to be Removed 13. Turning Path of a Toyota 4Runner 14. Proposed Raised Landscape Median 14 14

4' 4'
A
A

A A A A A A A A A A A
A
(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN
(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN
65G 65G
(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN

10.0000

10.0000
610.0000
F
1 E
2 E
3 D
4 F
6 G
5 G
14 A
7 B
8 C
9 C
10 C
11 C
12 C
13 OUT
IN
FEBCOLF876V6"
FEBCOLF886V4"
OUTIN
OUT
IN
FEBCO
LF876V
6"
4"
LF886V
FEBCO
OUTIN
1" M ETER P ER STD . 516 M ETER BO X A60048520.25" X 13.25" PER SP EC SH ET 1 " W A T S 0 09 Q TS E R I ES
4'
4'
2'
P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
22 cu ft
SBS
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
22 cu ft
SBS
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
22 cu ft
SBS
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
22 cu ft
SBS
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
22 cu ft
SBS
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P3-1
22 cu ft
SBS
P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P1X-1
P4-1
P4X-1 P2-1 P6-1 288 cu. ft. storage
P6-1 P2-1
P1X-1 P4X-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1
288 cu. ft. storage
P6-1 P2-1
P1X-1P4X-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
65G 65G
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
65G 65G
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P1X-1
P4-1
P4X-1 P2-1 P6-1

20.25" X 13.25" PER SPEC SHEETMETER BOX A60004851" METER PER STD. 516 1" WATTS 009QT SERIES O U T
I N
"LF876V 6FEBCO
"LF886V 4FEBCO

O U TI N
O U T
I N
FEBCO "LF876V 6
LF886V 4 "
FEBCO

O U TI N
2'
4'
4'

10.0000

10.0000
610.0000
F1
E
2 E
3 D
4 F
6 G
5 G
14 A
7 B
8 C
9 C
10 C
11 C
12 C
13 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P3-1
P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P1X-1
P4-1
P4X-1 P2-1 P6-1
P6-1 P2-1
P1X-1
P4X-1
P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1
288 cu. ft. storage
P6-1 P2-1
P1X-1P4X-1
P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1
288 cu. ft. storage
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P1X-1
P4-1
P4X-1 P2-1 P6-1
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
65G65G
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
65G 65G
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN

20.25" X 13.25" PER SPEC SHEETMETER BOX A60004851" METER PER STD. 516 1" WATTS 009QT SERIES O U T
I N
LF876V 6"FEBCO
LF886V 4"FEBCO

O U TI N
O U T
I N
FEBCO
LF876V 6"
LF886V 4"
FEBCO

O U TI N
2'
4'
4'

10.0000

10.0000
610.0000
F1
E
2 E
3 D
4 F
6 G
5 G
14 A
7 B
8 C
9 C
10 C
11 C
12 C
13 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P3-1
P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P1X-1
P4-1
P4X-1 P2-1 P6-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P1X-1
P4-1
P4X-1 P2-1 P6-1
P6-1 P2-1
P1X-1
P4X-1
P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1
288 cu. ft. storage
P6-1 P2-1
P1X-1P4X-1
P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1
288 cu. ft. storage
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
65G65G
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
65G 65G
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN

20.25" X 13.25" PER SPEC SHEETMETER BOX A60004851" METER PER STD. 516 1" WATTS 009QT SERIES O U T
I N
LF876V 6"FEBCO
LF886V 4"FEBCO

O U TI N
O U T
I N
FEBCO
LF876V 6"
LF886V 4"
FEBCO

O U TI N
2'
4'
4'

10.0000

10.0000
610.0000
F1
E
2 E
3 D
4 F
6 G
5 G
14 A
7 B
8 C
9 C
10 C
11 C
12 C
13 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1 P5-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P3-1
P4-1
P2-1 P6-1
P3-1
P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P1X-1
P4-1
P4X-1 P2-1 P6-1
P6-1 P2-1
P1X-1
P4X-1
P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1
288 cu. ft. storage
P6-1 P2-1
P1X-1P4X-1
P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1 P6-1 P2-1
288 cu. ft. storage
P2-1 P6-1
P1-1
P1X-1
P4-1
P4X-1 P2-1 P6-1
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
22 cu ft SBS
65G65G
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
65G 65G
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
(Opening)
81W"x54D"
4YD BIN
A
A

A A A A A A A A A A A
A

0.91.11.8 1.42.7 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.6 1.0 0.9 1.5 2.82.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.8 1.6 4.41.7 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.6 3.4 5.61.1 0.3 0.7 1.0 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.90.8 0.4 0.2 0.8 2.7 6.4 5.7 3.5 4.0 4.2 4.0 3.1 2.8 4.9 3.9 4.1 2.7 3.4 4.5 3.9 3.5 2.6 3.7 2.6 1.3 1.0 1.5 2.3 2.4 2.1 1.2 1.0 1.20.9 0.4 0.3 0.7 1.8 2.9 2.8 2.2 2.0 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.9 2.9 3.0 2.6 1.5 1.0 1.4

1.2 0.4 0.3 0.6 1.2 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.8 1.1 2.1 2.9 3.3 2.7 1.7 1.3 2.01.9 0.5 0.3 0.8 1.8 2.9 2.9 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.8 2.9 3.0 2.6 1.5 1.3 2.1

2.7 0.6 0.4 0.9 2.7 6.4 5.9 3.5 4.1 4.2 4.1 3.1 2.8 4.9 3.9 4.1 2.8 3.4 4.5 4.0 3.5 2.7 3.7 2.6 1.3 1.0 1.3 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.2 1.4 2.43.0 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.6 3.2 5.4

2.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.6 3.32.7 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.6 0.7 1.4 3.52.9 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.8 1.2 2.12.7 1.1 0.81.9 0.41.4

1.0 1.31.9 2.82.8 5.1

0.5 1.2 2.7 4.7 5.2 3.7 3.1 3.9 5.6 5.5 4.1 2.3 1.0 0.4 0.4 0.9 2.0 3.7 5.60.4 1.1 2.2 3.9 5.3 5.1 4.4 3.1 2.8 3.2 4.8 5.2 3.4 1.9 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.8 1.7 3.0 4.9

1.7 2.9 3.3 3.4 3.1 2.4 2.3 2.5 3.2 3.2 2.6 1.5 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.4 2.3 3.21.6 2.5 2.9 2.9 2.7 2.2 2.0 2.3 2.8 2.8 2.3 1.4 0.7 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.3 2.2 2.81.6 2.9 3.9 4.0 3.2 2.3 2.0 2.4 3.4 3.7 2.7 1.4 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.3 2.4 3.5

0.3 0.9 1.7 3.5 5.2 5.4 4.0 2.6 2.2 2.8 4.4 5.4 5.0 3.2 1.6 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.4 2.9 4.8

1.9 3.3 4.3 4.4 3.8 2.8 2.4 3.1 4.0 3.9 4.3 3.2 1.8 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.8 1.6 2.9 4.12.1 3.7 5.0 5.0 4.3 3.1 2.5 3.3 4.6 3.9 5.0 3.5 1.8 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.8 1.6 3.2 4.7

0.3 0.8 1.9 3.5 5.0 4.5 4.1 3.0 2.4 3.2 4.4 4.8 3.2 1.7 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.8 1.4 3.0 4.5

1.3 2.0 2.5 2.3 2.8 2.4 2.2 2.5 2.8 2.6 2.0 1.3 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.9 2.5

0.9 1.8 2.4 2.3 2.0 2.3 2.5 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.40.3 3.3 3.1 2.6 3.3 1.0 1.8 1.4 1.00.1 4.6 4.1 2.7 4.3 0.9 1.6 1.2 0.80.0 1.9 1.1 0.9

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.9 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5

2.1 2.3 2.01.1 1.2 1.1

1.1 1.6 2.2 2.3 2.0 1.41.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0

1.5 2.01.6 2.61.8 3.01.9 3.02.0 2.91.8 3.01.6 2.81.4 2.2

1.0 1.51.2 2.11.3 2.41.3 2.21.2 1.6

1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.01.1 1.7 2.2 2.4 2.0 1.5

1.6 2.2 2.3 2.11.0 1.1 1.2 1.1

2.3 3.52.3 3.82.2 3.7

2.1 2.11.8 1.81.3 1.3

1.6 2.2 2.3 2.11.0 1.1 1.2 1.1

4.0 2.5 2.0 3.3 3.8 2.3 2.2 3.6 3.5 1.9 1.8 2.52.9 2.4 2.2 2.7 2.8 2.3 2.2 2.8 2.7 2.1 2.4 4.34.2 2.6 2.1 3.5 4.0 2.4 2.3 3.8 3.7 2.2 2.2 2.73.4 2.4 2.1 3.0 3.3 2.3 2.2 3.2 3.1 2.1 2.3 3.32.7 2.4 2.2 2.5 2.6 2.3 2.2 2.6 2.6 2.2 2.4 4.14.6 3.0 2.5 3.9 4.4 2.8 2.7 4.2 4.1 2.5 2.3 2.65.0 3.4 2.8 4.2 4.7 3.1 3.0 4.5 4.3 2.7 2.4 3.2

5.6 3.4 2.8 4.7 5.3 3.1 2.9 5.1 5.0 2.7 2.6 4.13.4 2.7 2.4 3.1 3.3 2.6 2.5 3.2 3.1 2.3 2.3 2.63.1 2.4 2.1 2.8 2.9 2.3 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.1 2.3 3.24.7 2.5 1.9 3.9 4.5 2.2 2.0 4.4 4.3 2.0 2.3 4.12.1 1.6 1.4 1.9 2.0 1.5 1.4 1.9 1.9 1.6 2.0 2.50.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.9 3.1

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.8 2.0 4.20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.8 1.8 2.70.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.6 3.1 3.9 4.1 3.5 3.0 2.1 2.5 3.4 3.4 3.0 2.4 3.1 3.4 3.5 2.6 2.5 3.4 3.4 3.3 2.5 3.0 3.8 3.7 2.4 1.1 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.0 2.0 3.6

0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 1.2 1.9 1.6 2.2 4.30.9 0.7 0.4 0.4 4.0 2.2 2.4 3.4 2.9 2.62.7 1.7 0.7 0.5 4.7 2.7 2.5 3.6 1.6 1.15.2 2.6 1.0 0.7 4.9 2.7 2.6 4.44.6 2.7 1.1 0.7 4.2 2.5 2.4 2.84.7 2.5 1.0 0.7 3.6 2.2 2.3 3.42.6 2.0 1.0 0.7 2.4 2.0 2.3 3.93.3 2.2 1.1 0.7 3.2 2.1 2.1 2.55.5 2.9 1.2 0.7 4.3 2.4 2.3 3.35.0 2.9 1.3 0.8 4.2 2.4 2.4 3.94.4 2.6 1.2 0.9 3.5 2.2 2.1 2.52.9 2.2 1.1 0.9 2.6 2.1 2.2 3.3

4.5 2.6 1.2 1.0 3.9 2.3 2.4 4.04.9 2.9 1.2 1.0 4.1 2.4 2.3 2.85.5 2.9 1.2 1.0 4.6 2.4 2.4 3.83.5 2.3 1.1 0.9 3.1 2.1 2.2 3.43.0 2.1 1.0 0.8 2.8 1.8 1.5 1.54.7 2.2 0.9 0.8 3.6 1.5 0.9 0.72.4 1.4 0.7 0.6 1.8 1.0 0.5 0.4

0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 1.5 3.6 3.0 1.8 1.0 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.4 2.2 4.9 5.7 6.2 5.0 4.5 2.5 3.4 5.4 5.0 4.3 2.9 4.5 4.9 5.5 3.4 3.1 5.6 5.0 5.1 3.1 4.2 5.7 5.8 3.4 1.5 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.5 2.1 2.0 1.4 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.4 2.1 3.1 3.7 3.8 3.4 2.9 2.3 2.7 3.3 3.4 2.9 2.6 3.1 3.4 3.3 2.7 2.7 3.3 3.4 3.2 2.7 3.1 3.6 3.5 2.5 1.4 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.71.6 1.9 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.3 2.0 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.5 2.8 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.7 2.9 2.8 2.5 2.4 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.7 2.9 2.8 2.3 1.8 1.4 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.3 1.7 2.0 1.9 1.6 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.9 2.03.8 4.3 4.6 2.8 3.2 4.5 4.3 3.7 2.7 4.0 4.3 4.9 3.2 3.0 5.1 4.3 4.3 3.0 3.5 3.6 3.3 4.6 4.5 4.9 3.0 3.3 4.6 4.4 3.8 2.8 4.0 4.3 4.8 3.2 3.0 5.0 4.3 4.4 2.9 3.3 3.5 2.1 0.9 0.3 0.3 1.1 2.6 4.4 4.4 4.3 2.7 3.4 4.3 4.3 3.4

1.0 0.3 0.4 1.20.9 0.4 0.5 1.30.8 0.3 0.4 1.00.6 0.2 0.3 0.80.6 0.2 0.3 0.80.6 0.2 0.2 0.80.6 0.1 0.2 0.60.6 0.1 0.1 0.30.3 0.1 0.0 0.1

LA PALMA AVENUE

DALE STREET

CITY OF BUENA PARK
C
A
LL

BEFORE YOU
D
I
G
THE GRADING AND/OR IMPROVEMENT PLANSARE APPROVED FOR A PERIOD OF TWO (2)YEARS FROM THE DATE SIGNED BY THECITY ENGINEER. AFTER THE TWO (2) YEARPERIOD HAS LAPSED, THE ENGINEER OFRECORD MAY BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ANDPROCESS FOR CITY ENGINEER APPROVAL,UPDATED PLANS THAT COMPLY WITH THEMOST CURRENT CITY STANDARDS,PRACTICES, AND POLICIES.

OF INTENTION TO GRADE OR EXCAVATE.
227-2600
1-800

TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG
Underground Service Alert

SITE UNTIL BELOW AGENCY IS NOTIFIEDNO WORK SHALL BE DONE ON THIS CITY I. D. NO.

SHEET OF
ACCT. NO.

APPR DATE

REVISION

DESCRIPTION

DALE AND LA PALMA
REC.

PLANS PREPARED
NAME R.C.E. # EXP.

IMPORTANT NOTE:

MARK DATE INITIAL
E.O.R.

DATE

PHOTOMETRIC SITE PLAN
UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF:

BENCHMARK:

BASIS OF
BEARING:

OF RECORD'S
SEAL

ENGINEER
FOR: W.O
Call: TOLL FREE
1255 W. COLTON AVE. STE 619
REDLANDS, CA 92374
(760) 833-0401
[email protected]
PHOTOMETRIC LAYOUT 1

CALCULATION SURFACE PARAMETER AVERAGE
PARKING PERPENDICULAR ILLUMINANCE 1.83 FC

PHOTOMETRIC RESULTS

WALKWAYS/

OPEN SPACE

PERPENDICULAR
ILLUMINANCE 1.88 FC

IN-TRACT

PRIVATE STREETS

PERPENDICULAR
ILLUMINANCE 1.97 FC
PHOTOMETRIC RESULTS INCLUDES BUILDING LIGHTS ON FRONT AND REAR OF EACH UNIT, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION.

SOLAR POLE LIGHT 0 WATTS, 2,953 LUMENS, TYPE 3 DISTRIBUTION, N.T.S.

LEGEND
BACK TO BACK - SOLAR POLE LIGHT 0 WATTS, 2,953 LUMENS, TYPE 4 DISTRIBUTION, N.T.S.HOUSE COACH LIGHT - 18 WATTS, N.T.S. (LIGHTS SHOWN FOR PHOTOMETRIC PURPOSE ONLY) 1" = 30'
30' 15' 0' 30' 60'
SCALE:
1 CITY OF BUENA PARK, CALIFORNIA

PHOTOMETRIC SITE PLAN

DALE STREET AND LA PALMA AVENUE
℄ ℄ ℄ ℄ TT-24-1 RECEIVED JUL 14 2024 PLANNING DIV
0 1" = 30' 15 30 60 A
4'
4' A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 0 1" = 30' 15 30 60
4'
4' A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 0 1" = 30' 15 30 60
4'
4' A (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN 65G 65G(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN (Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN(Opening) 81W"x54D" 4YD BIN A A A A A A A A A A A A A FIRE LANE 0 1" = 30' 15 30 60

VICINITY MAP

CITY COUNCIL
September 24, 2024
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. GP-23-1, ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-23-1, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. TT-24-1, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CU-24-1, MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. MND-24-2
8030 Dale Street
APN: 070-501-01
Subject Property
Project Location

COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
La Palma Avenue
Dale Street
Tamarack Way
North
City of Buena Park
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
Meeting
Tuesday, September 24, 2024, 5:00 PM
Agenda Group
PUBLIC HEARING Item: 6B
Presented By
Sarabeth Suarez, Housing & CDBG Analyst
Prepared By
Matt Foulkes, Director of Community and Economic
Development
Approved By
Aaron France, City Manager

RECOMMENDED ACTION
1) Hold a public hearing to review the draft CDBG Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) for Fiscal Year 2023-2024; and 2) Approve the submission of the CDBG CAPER for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

PREVIOUS CITY COUNCIL ACTION
None.

DISCUSSION
The City of Buena Park has completed its 49th year of participation in the CDBG Program. In 2023, the City entered into an agreement with Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to accept and utilize CDBG funds in accordance with the rules and regulations set forth by HUD. The Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-2024 is a HUD-required report that evaluates the City’s performance for the past year as outlined in the City’s 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan for housing and community development programs. The report is due to HUD no later than September 28, 2024. The public hearing process allows citizen review, input, and evaluation of the CAPER. Upon Council’s approval, staff will finalize the CAPER and submit it to HUD for review. Below is a summary of the City’s accomplishments for FY 2023-2024.

Decent Housing – During FY 2023-2024, the City assisted nine (9) Buena Park residents with residential rehabilitation and lead testing/abatement projects.  Projects included:  exterior painting, window replacements, kitchen repairs, electrical panel upgrades, bathroom renovations, and other health and safety items. Additionally, a senior homeowner was referred by code enforcement to assist with plumbing issues causing dead grass/vegetation and extremely low water pressure throughout the house.  A forgivable loan was provided to repipe the entire house to assist in abating the code violations.

State HOME funds were utilized for six additional home improvement projects. CDBG and HOME funds were also utilized for administrative expenses, including income qualifying, loan servicing, strategic marketing, homeowner outreach, and project file management.

Suitable Living Environment – The City’s CDBG-funded activities are designed to improve the quality of life of its residents and people experiencing homelessness, as well as improving the physical infrastructure in its low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The table below summarizes the services provided and number of people assisted by each activity.

Organizaiton Name Services provided and number of people The Fair Housing Foundaiton
Assisted 124 Buena Park residents by providing resources and educ pracitces.

The Boys and Girls Club Provided mentoring, tutoring, and child care services to 1,228 youth Mercy House
Assisted 263 homeless individuals at the City’s emergency shelter w employment, and transiitonal services.

Homeless Outreach Program
Assisted 402 homeless individuals with local transportaiton services emergency supplies, relocaiton expenses, and other social welfare r The Buena Park Collaboratve - Money Smart Program (Financially Healthy) Provided workshops and one-on-one meeitngs to educate 112 resid savings accounts, reitrement funds, and other aspects of financial li Senior Medical Transportaiton Program Provided 354 seniors with non-emergency medical transportaiton s Graffiit Removal Program Removed 2,297 instances of graffiit within the City’s CDBG eligible a Code Enforcement
Addressed 639 complaints/violaitons within CDBG eligible areas foc the City’s housing stock and neighborhoods.

Friendly Center
Provided temporary rental and uitlity assistance, food distribuiton, programs to 470 Buena Park residents.

Smith Murphy Park & Carl Brenner Park ADA Improvements
During FY 2023-2024, plans were prepared, bids were completed, a Aguilar & Calderon Corporaiton for the two (2) ADA park improvem construciton meeitng was held to discuss City and federal requirem Davis Bacon prevailing wage and Seciton 3. Construciton began on scheduled to be completed by the end of September 2024. Staff wil projects and provide an update on their compleiton in the next CAP CDBG-CV Programs – The City continues to administer the COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Program, which is funded by HUD through Federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act funding (CDBG-CV funds). The purpose of this funding is to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus pandemic. Five (5) Buena Park residents that were impacted by the pandemic received rental assistance during FY 2023-2024.

PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
On September 6, 2024, the City published a public hearing notice announcing the 15-day required comment period regarding approval of the FY 2023-2024 CAPER in the Buena Park/Anaheim Independent newspaper. Additionally, the CAPER was available for public review at Buena Park City Hall, Economic Development Division; Buena Park Main Library; and the Buena Park website.

BUDGET IMPACT
There is no budget impact with the approval of the CAPER.

Attachments
FY 23-24 CDBG Consolidated Annual Performance & Evaluation Report (CAPER)

Consolidated Annual Performance & Evaluation Report
(CAPER)
July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024
DRAFT 09/06/2024
CAPER 1
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 Contents
CR-05 - Goals and Outcomes ....................................................................................................................1 CR-10 - Racial and Ethnic composition of families assisted......................................................................6 CR-15 - Resources and Investments 91.520(a) .........................................................................................7 CR-20 - Affordable Housing 91.520(b)......................................................................................................9 CR-25 - Homeless and Other Special Needs 91.220(d, e); 91.320(d, e); 91.520(c) ................................12 CR-30 - Public Housing 91.220(h); 91.320(j)...........................................................................................14 CR-35 - Other Actions 91.220(j)-(k); 91.320(i)-(j)....................................................................................15 CR-40 - Monitoring 91.220 and 91.230...................................................................................................19 CR-45 - CDBG 91.520(c) ..........................................................................................................................20 CR-58 - Section 3.....................................................................................................................................21 Attachments
Attachment 1: Public Notice and Summary of Public Comments Attachment 2: Map of CDBG-eligible Areas
Attachment 3: Summary of Fair Housing Impediments and Actions to Address Impediments Attachment 4: PR03: CDBG & CDBG-CV Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023 Attachment 5: PR26: CDBG & CDBG-CV Financial Summary Reports 2023 CAPER 1
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 CR-05 - Goals and Outcomes
Progress the jurisdiction has made in carrying out its strategic plan and its action plan.

91.520(a)
As a recipient of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, the City of Buena Park prepared a 5-year strategic plan to prioritize housing and community needs. The plan also identifies resources and programs to address needs. This strategic plan is known as the Consolidated Plan. The City Council approved the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan in May 2020.

A component of the Consolidated Plan is a 1-year expenditure plan known as the Annual Action Plan. The Action Plan is prepared so the City can receive its annual allocation of CDBG funds from the U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The Action Plan identifies the activities the City will carry out with CDBG funds during a fiscal year. At the end of the fiscal year, the City must prepare a performance report known as the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). The CAPER is prepared to assist residents and HUD in evaluating the City’s use of CDBG funds. The Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-2024 CAPER covers July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024.

The 2023-2024 reporting period is the fourth (4th) year of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan cycle. For the 2023-2024 reporting period, HUD awarded the City $749,820 in CDBG funds. The City also had $852,521 in prior year CDBG funds and $57,633 in program income available for programming. The City used these funds to support several activities that address the priority housing and community needs identified in the Consolidated Plan:
● CDBG resources were used to fund home improvement grants. During the reporting period, CDBG funds were used to assist nine (9) households with residential rehabilitation projects. ● CDBG funding was used to inspect six hundred and thirty-nine (639) housing units for housing and building code deficiencies.
● The social service needs of the City’s lower-income residents were met with CDBG-funded public services. A total of two thousand, eight hundred twenty-nine (2,829) seniors, youths, homeless, and lower-income individuals were assisted during the reporting period - additionally, two thousand, two hundred ninety-seven (2,297) instances of graffiti within the City’s CDBG target areas were removed.
● CDBG funding was used to provide CDBG program oversight and administration. These activities included providing fair housing counseling services to one hundred and twenty-four (124) households.
● The City utilized CDBG funding for two park improvement projects at Smith Murphy Park and Carl Brenner Park. Both parks are located in census tracts that have a low- moderate-income percentage greater than 51%. The projects consist of ADA compliance and accessibility improvements to the restrooms, concrete pathways, sidewalk ramps, handicap parking, picnic areas, drinking fountains, and playground areas. The purpose of the improvements is to make the parks accessible to handicapped or disabled residents while addressing health and safety concerns that benefit all park-goers in the surrounding neighborhoods. These projects began during FY 2023-2024 and are slated for completion by September 2024.

CAPER 2
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 All CDBG-funded housing and community activities aimed to improve the quality of life for Buena Park’s residents, especially low-income residents.

Information regarding activities undertaken with CDBG funds during the reporting period is provided in reports generated by HUD’s Integrated Disbursement & Information System (IDIS) (see Attachment 4 and Attachment 5, respectively).

During the 2023-2024 reporting period, the City continued implementing its CDBG-Coronavirus (CDBG-CV) funded activities. CDBG-CV funds were authorized by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief & Economic Security Act of 2020 (CARES Act). CDBG-CV funds must be used to prevent, prepare for, or respond to the impacts of the COVID-19 virus. The City received $1,397,359 in CDBG-CV in 2 rounds of funding. During the 2023-2024 reporting period, CDBG-CV funds were used to assist five (5) low-income Buena Park residents. CDBG-CV accomplishment and expenditure information is provided in Attachments 4 and 5.

To ensure CDBG program accomplishment information is available to the public, a public notice was published in the Buena Park-Anaheim Independent on September 6, 2024, announcing a required 15-day public comment period in compliance with HUD regulations. The notice also announced the required public hearing on September 24, 2024 (See Attachment 1). To date, the City has not received any public comments.

CAPER 3
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 Comparison of the proposed versus actual outcomes for each outcome measure submitted with the consolidated plan and explain, if applicable, why progress was not made toward meeting goals and objectives. 91.520(g) Categories, priority levels, funding sources and amounts, outcomes/objectives, goal outcome indicators, units of measure, targets, actual outcomes/outputs, and percentage completed for each of the grantee’s program year goals.

Goal Category Source /
Amount Indicator Unit of
Measure
Expected
– 5-Year
Strategic
Plan
Actual –
Strategic
Plan
Percent
Complete
Expected
23-24
Program
Year
Actual
23-24
Program
Year
Percent
Complete
Administration
and Planning
Administration
CDBG:
$131,560
Other Other 1,000 637 63.70% 180 124 68.89%
Economic
Opportunities
Non-Housing
Community
Development
CDBG: $0 Businesses assisted
Businesses
Assisted
5 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00%
Homeless
Continuum of
Care
Homeless
CDBG:
$41,583
Public service activities
other than Low/Moderate
Income Housing Benefit
Persons
Assisted
500 828 165.60% 200 402 201.00%
Homeless
Continuum of
Care
Homeless
Tenant-based rental
assistance / Rapid
Rehousing
Households
Assisted
20 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00%
Homeless
Continuum of
Care
Homeless
Homeless Person
Overnight Shelter
Persons
Assisted
500 703 140.60% 130 263 202.31%
Homeless
Continuum of
Care
Homeless Homelessness Prevention
Persons
Assisted
100 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00%
CAPER 4
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 Goal Category Source /
Amount Indicator Unit of
Measure
Expected
– 5-Year
Strategic
Plan
Actual –
Strategic
Plan
Percent
Complete
Expected
23-24
Program
Year
Actual
23-24
Program
Year
Percent
Complete
Housing
Preservation
Affordable
Housing
CDBG:
$336,227
Homeowner Housing
Rehabilitated
Household
Housing
Unit
50 29 58.00% 10 9 90.00%
Housing
Preservation
Affordable
Housing
CDBG:
$207,307
Housing Code
Enforcement/Foreclosed
Property Care
Household
Housing
Unit
3,750 2,989 79.71% 750 639 85.20%
Infrastructure
and Facility
Improvements
Non-Housing
Community
Development
CDBG:
$33,380
Public Facility or
Infrastructure Activities
other than Low/Moderate
Income Housing Benefit
Persons
Assisted 3,000 0 0.00%
2 projects
0 1 0.00%
Public Social
Services
Non-Homeless
Special Needs
CDBG:
$69,316
Public service activities
other than Low/Moderate
Income Housing Benefit
Persons
Assisted 20,000 7,499 2 37.50% 3,262 2 2,164 2 66.34%
Table 1 - Accomplishments – Program Year & Strategic Plan to Date

1. The Smith Murphy Park and Carl Brenner Park Accessibility Improvement projects began in FY 23-24 and are slated for completion by September 2024.

2. Graffiti Removal Program accomplishments are not included in the “Actual Strategic Plan”, “Expected 23-24 Program Year”, and “Actual 23-24 Program Year” figures – 7,857; 2,000; and 2,297, respectively. For FY 23-24, the Graffiti Removal Program reached 114.85% of its goal by removing 2,297 instances of graffiti within the City’s low-income census tracts.

CAPER 5
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 Assess how the jurisdiction’s use of funds, particularly CDBG, addresses the priorities and specific objectives identified in the plan, giving special attention to the highest priority activities identified.

As summarized above, the City used CDBG funding during the 2023-2024 reporting period to address several priority needs identified in the Consolidated Plan. Needs addressed include housing rehabilitation, code enforcement, safety-net social services for at-risk and lower-income residents, fair housing services, public infrastructure improvements, and program administration.

The 2023-2024 reporting period is the fourth year of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan cycle. Aside from program administration activities, four activities exceeded their goals: Mercy House Living Centers, Graffiti Removal Program, Homeless Outreach Program, and Senior Transportation Program. Moreover, the Residential Rehabilitation Program, Neighborhood Improvement/Code Enforcement Program, Fair Housing Foundation, Boys & Girls Club, Friendly Center, and Buena Park Collaborative made great efforts to achieve their goals. CDBG program staff continues to monitor activities and provide technical assistance in support of each subrecipients’ goal attainment.

The City continued responding to the COVID-19 pandemic through the CDBG-CV funded Emergency Rental Assistance Program during FY 2023-2024. The City used CDBG-CV funds to provide financial assistance to five (5) residents at risk of eviction. HUD requires that the City spend 100% of CDBG-CV funds by 2026. As of June 30, 2024, the City has utilized approximately 90.5% of its CDBG-CV funds and will continue to use them to prevent, prepare, and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

CAPER 6
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 CR-10 - Racial and Ethnic composition of families assisted Describe the families assisted (including the racial and ethnic status of families assisted).

91.520(a)

CDBG CDBG-CV
White 1981 2
Black or African American 280 0
Asian 248 1
American Indian or American Native 36 0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 24 0
Other 260 2
Total * 2829 5
Hispanic 1258 4
Not Hispanic 1571 1
Table 2 – Table of assistance to racial and ethnic populations by source of funds * By default, Table 2 in IDIS excludes “Other” and CDBG-CV program beneficiaries.

Narrative
Table 2 provides demographic data for most CDBG-funded activities. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, approximately 38.3% of the City’s population is White, approximately 2.4% of the City’s population is Black/African American, approximately 32.7% of the City’s population is Asian, and approximately 40% is Hispanic. Table 2 indicates that approximately 70% of individuals served with CDBG-funded activities are White, approximately 9.9% are Black/African American, and approximately 8.8% are Asian.

Furthermore, Table 2 data indicates that about 44.5% of assisted persons are Hispanic. Year-end accomplishment data from these programs indicates that approximately 87.7% of assisted households are very low-income (income less than 50% of the County median income). Data for CDBG-CV funded programs indicate demographic characteristics of program beneficiaries - approximately 40% are White, 0% are Black/African American, 20% are Asian, and 80% are Hispanic/Latino. All CDBG-CV beneficiaries are low-income Buena Park residents.

According to the City’s 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, most racial and ethnic populations are experiencing one or more of HUD’s “housing problems.” Housing cost is the most prevalent housing problem (the percentage of household income dedicated to maintaining housing). The data from Table 2 appears to support the Consolidated Plan analysis. In general, lower-income households may require some form of assistance to help compensate for the higher percentage of income expended on housing.

CAPER 7
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 CR-15 - Resources and Investments 91.520(a)
Identify the resources made available
Source of Funds Source Resources Made
Available
Amount Expended
During Program Year
CDBG CDBG $1,659,974 $819,373
CDBG-CV Other $157,015 * $24,315
Table 3 - Resources Made Available
* The City’s total CDBG-CV grant was $1,397,359. Over the span of four years, a total of $1,264,658 (90.5%) of CDBG-CV funds has been expended.

Narrative
According to the City’s 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan, the City anticipated utilizing $749,820 in new CDBG program resources (2023 CDBG Annual Allocation), plus $910,154 in Prior Year CDBG funds and CDBG Program Income funds. The City did not receive new CDBG-CV funding during the reporting period.

As planned, the City received its 2023 CDBG grant of $749,820 and had access to prior year funds.

Additionally, the City received $57,633 in program income during the reporting period. In 2020, the City received $1,397,359 in CDBG-CV funding; no additional CDBG-CV funding has been received. HUD requires that 80 percent of CDBG-CV funds be expended by the end of FY 2023-2024 and 100 percent by the end of FY 2025-2026. As reported in Table 3, the City expended $819,373 in CDBG funds and $24,315 in CDBGCV funds (for a total of $1,264,658 in CDBG-CV funds expended over four years) during the 2023-2024 reporting period. Detailed information regarding the use of CDBG funding for the 2023-2024 reporting period is provided in the CDBG & CDBG-CV Financial Summary Reports (Attachment 5 – PR26).

Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments Target Area
Planned
Percentage of
Allocation
Actual
Percentage of
Allocation
Narrative Description
CDBG Eligible
Area
14 31 Funding is limited to specific areas of the City that are predominately low- and moderate-income
City of Buena
Park
86 69 Funding is utilized throughout the City to benefit eligible households
Table 4 – Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments Narrative
As demonstrated above, the City received and expended CDBG funding as planned, although program income was received that was not originally anticipated. Additionally, most FY 2023-2024 expenditures CAPER 8
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 were used citywide. CDBG-funded code enforcement, graffiti removal, and public park improvement activities were carried out in CDBG-eligible areas (see Attachment 2 for a map of the CDBG-eligible areas).

CDBG-CV funds were carried out on a citywide basis.

Leveraging
Explain how federal funds leveraged additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements were satisfied, as well as how any publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that were used to address the needs identified in the plan.

The City of Buena Park made an effort to leverage CDBG funds to the greatest extent possible.

During the reporting period, the City utilized $311,967 in State HOME funds to support housing rehabilitation activities:
● During FY 2023-2024, six (6) State HOME-funded residential rehabilitation projects were in various stages. Four projects were completed for a total of $250,950 and two additional projects are slated for completion in FY 2024-2025.
● $61,017 was utilized for administrative costs including program marketing, general program administration, loan servicing, and activity delivery costs.

There is no match requirement for the CDBG program.

CAPER 9
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 CR-20 - Affordable Housing 91.520(b)
Evaluation of the jurisdiction's progress in providing affordable housing, including the number and types of families served, the number of extremely low-income, low-income, moderate-income, and middle-income persons served.

One-Year Goal Actual
Number of Homeless households to be
provided affordable housing units
0 0
Number of Non-Homeless households to be
provided affordable housing units
10 9
Number of Special-Needs households to be
provided affordable housing units
0 0
Total 10 9
Table 5 – Number of Households
One-Year Goal Actual
Number of households supported through
Rental Assistance
0 0
Number of households supported through
The Production of New Units
0 0
Number of households supported through
Rehab of Existing Units
10 9
Number of households supported through
Acquisition of Existing Units
0 0
Total 10 9
Table 6 – Number of Households Supported
Discuss the difference between goals and outcomes and problems encountered in meeting these goals.

The City of Buena Park 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan anticipated utilizing CDBG funds to rehabilitate ten housing units – rehabilitation activities were completed at nine housing units during the reporting period.

The Orange County Housing Authority (OCHA) provided rental assistance - 340 households were assisted CAPER 10
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 during the reporting period. The City does not control OCHA’s allocation of housing assistance vouchers or certificates.

Discuss how these outcomes will impact future annual action plans.

To accommodate for fluctuations in CDBG funding, the City has sought other funding sources to address housing needs. The City has access to state housing resources that it may utilize for housing rehabilitation in future years; however, competition for these resources has increased as CDBG, and other federal housing funds have decreased. This competition for funding will most likely result in few housing resources for the City in future years. In past years, redevelopment funding was available to the City; however, the governor and state legislature eliminated this funding source in 2012.

Include the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income persons served by each activity where information on income by family size is required to determine the eligibility of the activity.

Number of Households Served CDBG Actual HOME Actual *
Extremely Low-income 2 0
Low-income 1 0
Moderate-income 6 0
Total 9 0
Table 7 – Number of Households Served
* The City is not a direct recipient of HOME funds from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

Narrative Information
Table 7 provides information regarding the households that received housing rehabilitation assistance during FY 2023-2024. OCHA reports that 340 Buena Park low-income and extremely low-income renter households received rental assistance during the 2023-2024 reporting period. The City is not a participating jurisdiction (i.e., recipient) of HOME funds directly from HUD.

The City uses other resources, including density bonuses and other incentives to develop new affordable housing units.
● 7682 & 7692 9th St: A multi-family residential development with 18 units; 2 units are reserved for very low-income homebuyers. The project is slated for completion in late 2024. ● Arte Home (7411 Artesia Blvd): A multi-family residential development with 22 units; 2 units will be affordable to very low-income renters. The project was completed in March 2024. ● Orchard View Gardens Senior Housing (8300 Valley View St): A 66-unit affordable senior apartment complex with a community center, on-site parking, and site improvements. Units will be exclusive to residents 62+ years old and affordable to households earning less than 60% of the Area Median Income. Eight units are reserved for Permanent Supportive Housing to house CAPER 11
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 formerly homeless seniors. The project is currently under construction and will be completed in late 2024.
● 7101 Lincoln Ave: An agreement is in place to develop a 55-unit affordable housing project on a

1.34- acre City-owned site. The project will include one, two, and three-bedroom units targeting families earning 30% to 70 % of the Area Median Income. The project will include after-school tutoring, computer literacy classes, exercise, workforce development programs, and youth programming. Ten units will be reserved for Permanent Supportive housing, five will give a preference to student families, and 11 will give preference to veteran families. Entitlements for this project have been approved and the developer is obtaining financing.

Additionally, as indicated above, the City continued to support the program efforts of OCHA to provide federal rental assistance to lower-income Buena Park residents.

CAPER 12
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 CR-25 - Homeless and Other Special Needs 91.220(d, e); 91.320(d, e); 91.520(c) Evaluate the jurisdiction’s progress in meeting its specific objectives for reducing and ending homelessness through:

Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs
The City's Homeless Outreach Program received CDBG funding during the 2023-2024 reporting period to provide homeless outreach services. These services are funded in support of the City’s interdepartmental working group to address chronic homelessness issues. Homeless Outreach Program staff provided emergency hotel stays, shelter connections, social service referrals, local transportation, relocation assistance, transitional program fees, other emergency supplies homeless individuals may need in day to day life.

The City also works with regional homeless service providers that have established outreach programs that engage the homeless throughout the region. Furthermore, the City supports the efforts of the regional Continuum of Care and its outreach, assessment, and coordinated entry strategy.

Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons During the 2023-2024 reporting period, the City supported emergency shelter services with CDBG resources. Funding was allocated to Mercy House Living Centers in support of its north Orange County emergency shelter. A total of two hundred sixty-three (263) individuals were provided with emergency shelter and support services during the reporting period.

Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are: likely to become homeless after being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); and, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs As outlined in the Consolidated Plan, the City's homeless strategy calls for providing social services that help prevent individuals and families from becoming homeless. To this end, during the 2023-2024 reporting period, CDBG funding was allocated to support safety-net services such as transportation for seniors to travel to and from medical appointments, case management, and reduced-cost afterschool childcare services.

Additionally, OCHA reports that twenty-seven (25) formerly homeless disabled veterans that reside in Buena Park benefitted from Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (VASH) vouchers during the reporting period. In addition to housing assistance, veterans receive comprehensive support services from the Veterans Administration. OCHA also reports that thirteen (14) formerly homeless households in Buena CAPER 13
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 Park have been provided a Continuum of Care Program Permanent Supportive Housing Certificates.

Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again
Rapid rehousing was listed in the City’s Consolidated Plan as a low-priority need (mainly because the City has not received funding requests for this type of homeless program). In recent years, agencies that traditionally provided transitional housing have begun integrating rapid rehousing into their overall agency strategy to provide access to permanent housing. The City did not receive a rapid rehousing funding request during the 2023-2024 reporting period. As reported above, thirteen (14) homeless households benefited from Continuum of Care Program Permanent Supportive Housing Certificates, and twenty-seven (25) homeless veteran households benefited from VASH vouchers.

CAPER 14
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 CR-30 - Public Housing 91.220(h); 91.320(j)
Actions taken to address the needs of public housing
The City of Buena Park does not own or manage public housing.

Actions taken to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership
Not applicable.

Actions taken to provide assistance to troubled PHAs
Not applicable.

CAPER 15
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 CR-35 - Other Actions 91.220(j)-(k); 91.320(i)-(j)
Actions taken to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment. 91.220 (j); 91.320 (i) As outlined in the Consolidated Plan, the City has established a list of actions it can take to address the negative impacts of certain barriers to creating affordable housing opportunities:

Land Use Controls: The City will consider granting a density bonus to enhance the feasibility of an affordable or senior housing project. The City may also consider granting reduced parking for senior housing and other affordable housing projects. Four housing projects currently under construction were eligible for development incentives due to their affordable housing component.

Local Processing and Permit Procedures: The City will provide one-stop permit processing to reduce project review and approval time. As previously reported, four housing projects currently under construction were eligible for development incentives due to their affordable housing component.

Fees and Other Exactions Required of Developers and Site Improvements: Reductions in development fees will be considered, especially for senior and affordable housing projects. Waiver of site improvements will not be provided; however, City staff will ensure developers are aware of these requirements early in the process so that associated costs can be factored into the overall project cost early in the development process. As previously reported, four affordable housing projects under construction were eligible for development incentives due to their affordable housing component.

Tax Policies: There is no local tax.

Actions taken to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) The City’s 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan indicates that a portion of CDBG funds would be allocated to address underserved seniors' housing and service needs and extremely low-income households.

Additionally, the City indicated it would encourage and support OCHA’s efforts to obtain additional rental assistance funding, especially for senior and low-income households. Finally, the City’s housing rehabilitation programs would be available to help elderly homeowners improve their respective residences to address specific household needs.

During the 2023-2024 reporting period, three hundred fifty-seven (354) seniors accessed transportation services via a CDBG-funded program – 99.2% of program beneficiaries are reported to have extremely low income. The Boys & Girls Club provided low cost youth development services to the community – approximately 20% of participants are from extremely low-income households. The Friendly Center provided free referral services, emergency rental assistance, food services, and other free social service programs to lower-income households – approximately 94% of program participants are reported to be from families with extremely low income. Additionally, seven out of the nine households participating in CAPER 16
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 the City’s CDBG-funded housing rehabilitation program were elderly. Finally, OCHA reports that of the 340 Buena Park households that received rental assistance during the 2023-2024 reporting period, 173 are senior households, 85 are disabled households, and 82 are lower-income families.

Actions taken to reduce lead-based paint hazards. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) The Residential Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 changed the federal approach to addressing LBP by emphasizing preventing childhood lead poisoning through housing-based approaches.

To this end, the City has included lead-based paint hazard reduction as an eligible activity in the City’s housing rehabilitation programs.

All application packets for the City’s housing rehabilitation program include a notice to educate residents about the health dangers of lead and encourage children's screening for elevated blood-lead levels.

Additionally, all existing units are screened for lead-based paint before using federal funds. Housing units identified as having lead-based paint hazards are treated, so the lead-based paint hazards are addressed per federal requirements. The use of lead-based paint is prohibited in newly constructed units.

All housing units rehabilitated during the 2023-2024 reporting period were constructed before 1978. Nine (9) units were tested for lead-based paint hazards. All project locations were thoroughly assessed to determine whether lead testing was needed. Interim Controls were used to address lead-based paint hazards as required by HUD regulations.

Actions taken to reduce the number of poverty-level families. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) According to the U.S. Census Bureau, approximately 9.5% of Buena Park residents live in poverty. Of these residents living in poverty, approximately 16.7% are age 65 and older and 11.3% are children under 18.[1] The Consolidated Plan and 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan identified several activities and services to be implemented to combat poverty during the reporting period to assist these households:
● Implement housing programs (e.g., housing rehabilitation) for lower-income households with children and seniors. As reported above, seven of eight housing units that received residential rehabilitation assistance during the reporting period were senior-owned. ● OCHA supports rental assistance programs for very low-income renters, especially senior households and households with children. During the 2023-2024 reporting period, OCHA assisted 340 lower-income Buena Park renter households – 173 are senior residents, 85 are disabled, and 82 are family households.
● The City used CDBG funding to provide homeless services to 402 unhoused individuals through the Homeless Outreach Program. Additionally, Mercy House provided emergency shelter for 263 individuals during the reporting period.
● CDBG-funded public services assisted lower-income households, including seniors, children, and households at risk of becoming homeless. Approximately 2,160 lower-income Buena Park residents were assisted with social safety net services.

CAPER 17
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 ● The City’s Economic Development Strategy aims to create an environment conducive to building and sustaining businesses and employment opportunities, especially for lower-income persons.

No CDBG funding was allocated for economic development activities during the 2023-2024 reporting period; however, the City continued implementing its Economic Development Strategy to provide incentives for job growth and employment opportunities. The City worked with a developer for the construction of a 178-unit hotel on The Source site, which was completed and held its grand opening in June 2024. The City is also working on other projects, including an entertainment/hospitality development on an 8.74-acre site, an extended stay hotel development, and a new automobile dealership on a 2.7-acre site. ● CDBG-CV funds were critical to the City’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in response to the needs of lower-income Buena Park households. Financial assistance to pay inarrears rent helped households struggling with the loss of employment or reduced work hours. [1.] POVERTY STATUS IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS, 2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, S1701.

Actions taken to develop institutional structure. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) During FY 2023-2024, the City continued efforts to eliminate institutional gaps and enhance the coordination of programs with all community segments. For example, the City collaborated with local nonprofit organizations to deliver public services. City departments continued to work together to implement activities funded in whole or in part with CDBG funds that address priority needs. The City assisted OCHA by participating in the Cities Advisory Committee – a quarterly meeting of cities to discuss federal housing assistance and regional housing issues. The City also supports the County’s CoC Homeless Assistance grant application to HUD and the County’s plan to end chronic homelessness, the regional discharge plan, and the regional coordinated entry system for the region’s homeless.

Actions taken to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
The City of Buena Park does not operate public housing. The Orange County Housing Authority (OCHA) provides rental assistance in the community. Federal legislation requires that OCHA prepare five-year and one-year plans highlighting its mission, goals, and objectives related to public and assisted housing programs. The City reviewed the Authority’s plans and provided OCHA the opportunity to review and consult with the City regarding its Consolidated Plan and CAPER. This cross-consultation aims to provide consistent and coordinated housing services for City residents.

As evident by past and current affordable housing development activities, Buena Park maintains a positive working relationship with private and nonprofit housing developers. Ongoing consultation with local nonprofits also assisted the City in coordinating the efficient and effective use of limited federal resources.

CAPER 18
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 Identify actions taken to overcome the effects of any impediments identified in the jurisdictions analysis of impediments to fair housing choice. 91.520(a) Consolidated Plan regulations require CDBG recipients to (1) examine and attempt to alleviate housing discrimination within their jurisdiction; (2) promote fair housing choice for all persons; (3) provide opportunities for all persons to reside in any given housing development, regardless of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, or national origin; (4) promote housing that is accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities; (5) and comply with the non-discrimination requirements of the Fair Housing Act. HUD encourages jurisdictions to consult with one another and initiate region-wide fair housing planning. The Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) is the primary document utilized for this purpose.

In 2020, the City partnered with 19 Orange County jurisdictions to update AI. The AI identified various actions that can be implemented over a five-year period to address regional and local barriers to fair housing. A summary of impediments and actions taken during the FY 2023-2024 reporting period is provided in Attachment 3.

CAPER 19
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 CR-40 – Monitoring 91.220 and 91.230
Describe the standards and procedures used to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and used to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements
The City’s monitoring plan is designed to provide program staff with the information needed to verify the accuracy of data supplied by subrecipients, ensure that subrecipients are carrying out individual activities as described in their contracts in a timely manner, and ensure subrecipients use appropriate accounting and record-keeping methods to account for the use of CDBG funds. CDBG program staff also works closely with City departments to ensure CDBG program regulations and other federal requirements are implemented.

During the fiscal year, subrecipients submit quarterly accomplishment reports, including documentation, to support CDBG reimbursement requests. The City’s monitoring plan also calls for regular on-site visits of subrecipients. Program staff monitored CDBG-funded subrecipients during the reporting period. There were no significant findings or concerns. Program staff used the monitoring visit as an opportunity to discuss program challenges and potential program modifications that can assist the subrecipients in meeting program goals and objectives.

The City has made every effort to comply with all CDBG and Consolidated Plan regulations. The City’s Citizen Participation Plan ensures that community input is considered before submitting a substantial amendment or an annual update to HUD. It also provides residents the opportunity to review and comment on annual performance. Construction, professional service, and subrecipient agreements have been prepared to ensure compliance with applicable federal regulations. Additionally, the City has implemented an open procurement process that encourages bidding from minority and women-owned businesses.

Citizen Participation Plan 91.105(d); 91.115(d)
Describe the efforts to provide citizens with reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment on performance reports.

To encourage resident participation in the City’s CDBG program, the City published a notice in the Buena Park-Anaheim Independent on September 6, 2024, announcing a 15-day public comment period and 2023-2024 CAPER public hearing. A copy of this notice is provided as Attachment 1. The draft CAPER was made available for public review and comment from September 6, 2024, through September 24, 2024, at Buena Park City Hall, Buena Park Senior Center, Buena Park Library, and the City’s website. The Buena Park City Council held a public hearing on September 24, 2024, to obtain additional public comments. To date, no public comments have been received.

CAPER 20
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 CR-45 - CDBG 91.520(c)
Specify the nature of, and reasons for, any changes in the jurisdiction’s program objectives and indications of how the jurisdiction would change its programs as a result of its experiences.

There were no changes to the 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan.

Does this Jurisdiction have any open Brownfields Economic Development Initiative (BEDI) grants?
No
[BEDI grantees] Describe accomplishments and program outcomes during the last year.

Not applicable
CAPER 21
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 CR-58 - Section 3
Identify the number of individuals assisted and the types of assistance provided.

Total Labor Hours CDBG HOME ESG HOPWA HTF
Total Number of Activities 2 0 0 0 0
Total Labor Hours 0
Total Section 3 Worker Hours 0
Total Targeted Section 3 Worker Hours 0
Table 8 – Total Labor Hours
Qualitative Efforts - Number of Activities by Program CDBG HOME ESG HOPWA HTF Outreach efforts to generate job applicants who are Public Housing Targeted Workers
Outreach efforts to generate job applicants who are Other Funding Targeted Workers.

Direct, on-the job training (including apprenticeships).

Indirect training such as arranging for, contracting for, or paying tuition for, off-site training.

Technical assistance to help Section 3 workers compete for jobs (e.g., resume assistance, coaching).

Outreach efforts to identify and secure bids from Section 3 business concerns.

Technical assistance to help Section 3 business concerns understand and bid on contracts.

Division of contracts into smaller jobs to facilitate
participation by Section 3 business concerns.

Provided or connected residents with assistance in seeking employment including: drafting resumes,preparing for
interviews, finding job opportunities, connecting residents to job placement services.

Held one or more job fairs.

Provided or connected residents with supportive services that can provide direct services or referrals.

CAPER 22
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021) DRAFT 9.06.2024 Provided or connected residents with supportive services that provide one or more of the following: work readiness health screenings, interview clothing, uniforms, test fees, transportation.

Assisted residents with finding child care.

Assisted residents to apply for, or attend community college or a four year educational institution.

Assisted residents to apply for, or attend vocational/technical training.

Assisted residents to obtain financial literacy training and/or coaching.

Bonding assistance, guaranties, or other efforts to support viable bids from Section 3 business concerns.

Provided or connected residents with training on computer use or online technologies.

Promoting the use of a business registry designed to create opportunities for disadvantaged and small businesses.

Outreach, engagement, or referrals with the state one-stop system, as designed in Section 121(e)(2) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act.

Other.

Table 9 – Qualitative Efforts - Number of Activities by Program Narrative
Although the City completed the planning, engineering, and bidding process for two park improvement projects that are subject to Section 3, construction did not begin until after July 1, 2024; therefore, there is nothing to report for FY 2023-2024. Section 3 reporting for both projects will be included in the City’s FY 2024-2025 CAPER.

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

SUMMARY OF PUBLIC COMMENTS
15-Day Comment Period
To be determined
9/24/2024 City Council Meeting
To be determined
Attachment 2

Attachment 3
Buena Park Analysis of Impediments Fair Housing Summary PROPOSED AI GOALS AND STRATEGIES FY 2023-2024 ACCOMPLISHMENTS 1) In collaboration with the OCHA:
a) Attend quarterly Orange County Housing Authority (OCHA) Housing Advisory Committee to enhance the exchange of
information regarding the availability, procedures, and policies related to the Housing Assistance Voucher program and regional housing issues.
b) Support OCHA's affirmative fair marketing plan and
deconcentrating policies by providing five-year and annual PHA plan certifications.
c) In coordination with OCHA and fair housing services provider, conduct landlord education campaign to educate property owners about State law prohibiting discrimination based on household income.
a)Staff attended quarterly online meetings.
b) The City provided the PHA Plan certifications to OCHA staff upon request. c) California law expanded “source of income” protections to individuals who use housing rent assistance (e.g., Housing Choice Voucher) effective January 2020. The Fair Housing Foundation (FHF) is prepared to receive and address these types of complaints. The FHF received allegations from 1 Buena Park resident of discrimination based on income during the FY 23-24 reporting period. Nineteen additional allegations of fair housing law violations were received by FHF – 1 based on national origin, 2 based on familial status, 2 based on race, 2 based on gender, 7 based on mental disability, and 5 based on physical disability. Fair Housing Foundation successfully resolved 19 cases through counseling and 1 case was opened for further investigation. 2) Through the City's fair housing contractor:
a) Provide fair housing education and information to apartment managers and homeowner associations on why denial of
reasonable modifications/accommodations is unlawful.
b) Conduct multi-faceted fair housing outreach to tenants, landlords, property owners, realtors, and property management companies. Methods of outreach may include workshops,
informational booths, presentations to community groups, and distribution of multilingual fair housing literature.
a) During the reporting period, FHF received approximately 8 inquiries regarding reasonable accommodation from Buena Park residents. b) During the reporting period, FHF held 4 fair housing workshops for Buena Park residents and 2 information booths at City events as well as 3 workshops available to the public. Approximately 818 residents participated in these outreach and education services. They also attended 8 community meeting and held 3 community presentations to further market their services. c) The FHF assisted 124 unduplicated Buena Park households by addressing 159 fair housing issues, disputes, and inquiries. Most disputes centered on evictions, notices, and habitability.
d) FHF conducts its audits based on the most common protected classes to identify issues and educate the public.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
1 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 1 of 31
IDIS Activity: 2 - CDBG COMMITTED FUNDS ADJUSTMENT
Project: 0002 - CONVERTED CDBG ACTIVITIES
PGM Year: 1994
Description:

Matrix Code: General Program Administration (21A)
Objective:

Outcome:

Open 10/3/2001 12:00:00 AM
,
National Objective:

Status:

Location:

Initial Funding Date: 01/01/0001
Activity to prevent, prepare for, and respond to Coronavirus: No Financing
Fund Type Grant Year Grant Funded Amount Drawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program Year Total

CDBG EN
Total
Pre-2015
1982
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
B82MC060502
B86MC060502
B87MC060502
B88MC060502
B89MC060502
B90MC060502
B91MC060502
B92MC060502
B93MC060502
B94MC060502
B95MC060502
$7,860,497.55 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $689,000.00
$0.00 $655,000.00
$0.00 $656,000.00
$0.00 $620,000.00
$0.00 $645,000.00
$0.00 $614,000.00
$0.00 $686,000.00
$0.00 $727,000.00
$0.00 $830,000.00
$0.00 $904,000.00
$0.00 $834,497.55
$7,860,497.55 $0.00 $7,860,497.55
Proposed Accomplishments
Number assisted:

Actual Accomplishments
Person
Hispanic
White:

Black/African American:

Asian:

American Indian/Alaskan Native:

Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander:

Owner
Total Hispanic
Renter
Total Hispanic
Total
Total Hispanic Total
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Attachment 4
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
2 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 2 of 31
Total: 0
American Indian/Alaskan Native & White:

Asian White:

Black/African American & White:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & Black/African American:

Other multi-racial:

Asian/Pacific Islander:

Hispanic:
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
Female-headed Households: 0
Income Category:

Low Mod
Moderate
Extremely Low
Non Low Moderate
Total
Percent Low/Mod
Owner
0 Renter
0 Total
0 0
0 0
0 Person
0 Annual Accomplishments
No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
3 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 3 of 31
IDIS Activity: 453 - CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
Project: 0013 - CDBG-CV Public Services
PGM Year: 2020
Description:

Matrix Code: Subsistence Payment (05Q)
Sustainability
Objective: Provide decent affordable housing
Outcome:

Open
6650 Beach Blvd Buena Park, CA 90621-2905
National Objective: LMC
Status:

Location:

Rental assistance for low-income families at 80% or below of AMI that have been financially impacted by COVID-19 from job loss, reduction in work hours or layoff.

Initial Funding Date: 03/27/2021
Activity to prevent, prepare for, and respond to Coronavirus: Yes Financing
Fund Type Grant Year Grant Funded Amount Drawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program Year Total

CDBG EN
Total
2020 B20MW060502 $480,044.56 $24,315.00 $371,203.85
$480,044.56 $24,315.00 $371,203.85
Proposed Accomplishments
People (General) : 275
Number assisted:

Actual Accomplishments
Person
Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 9
13 22
White:

Black/African American:

Total:

Asian:

American Indian/Alaskan Native:

Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & White:

Asian White:

Black/African American & White:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & Black/African American:

Other multi-racial:

Asian/Pacific Islander:

Hispanic:

Owner
Total Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Renter
Total Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Total
Total Hispanic Total
17 6
12 0
0 0
2 1
0 11
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 49
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
4 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 4 of 31
Female-headed Households: 0 0 0
Income Category:

Low Mod
Moderate
Extremely Low
Non Low Moderate
Total
Percent Low/Mod
Owner
0 0
0 0
0 Renter
0 0
0 0
0 Total
0 0
0 0
0 Person
16 13
15 0
44 100.0%
Annual Accomplishments
Years Accomplishment Narrative # Benefitting
2020
2021
2022
2023
The COVID-19 Rental Assistance Program offers rental assistance for income eligible Buena Park residents that have been financially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The program offers a grant of up to $4,500 per household. During program year 2020-2021, 154 applications were received, 44 applications were approved, and 70 applications were denied. Out of the 154 applications received during the year, 40 were pending review/approval.

The COVID-19 Rental Assistance Program offers rental assistance for income eligible Buena Park residents that have been financially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The program offers a grant of up to $4,500 per household. During program year 2021-2022, the City received 30 new rental assistance applications. Throughout the year, 27 applications were approved, 35 were either denied or withdrawn by the applicant, and 7 of the new applications are currently under review. In total, the City has assisted 71 residents with rental assistance between fiscal year 2020-2021 and 2021-2022. As we stray further from the beginning of the pandemic, there is now less interest in the program but the City continues to advertise the program and accept applications. The Program will continue through program year 2022-2023.

During the first quarter, the City provided rental assistance to two (2) unduplicated residents and one (1) that was ongoing from the previous fiscal year. Two (2) residents received their full grant amount and one (1) continued to receive assistance into the second quarter. A total of $12,000 was granted during the first quarter. During the second quarter, four (4) residents received their full rental assistance grant amount. A total of $17,519 was granted during the second quarter. During the third quarter, the City provided rental assistance to two (2) unduplicated Buena Park residents. A total of $9,000 was granted during the third quarter. During the fourth quarter, the City provided rental assistance to two (2) unduplicated Buena Park residents. A total of $5,975 was granted for rental assistance during this quarter. All grantees provided the required documentation to show they had been negatively impacted by COVID-19. During fiscal year 2022-2023, a total of $44,494 was utilized to assist 10 Buena Park residents with rental assistance.

During the first quarter, the City provided rental assistance to one (1) resident that was ongoing from the previous fiscal year and counted in the 4th quarter of the previous FY. This resident received $3,000 during the first quarter, which completed their rental assistance. During the second quarter, four (4) residents received their full rental assistance grant amount. A total of $17,925 was granted during the second quarter. During the third quarter, the City provided rental assistance to one (1) unduplicated Buena Park resident. A total of $1,130 was granted during the third quarter. During the fourth quarter, the City continued providing rental assistance to the resident approved in the third quarter. A total of $2,260 was granted for rental assistance during this quarter. All grantees provided the required documentation to show they had been negatively impacted by COVID-19. During fiscal year 2023-2024, a total of $24,315 was utilized to assist 5 unduplicated Buena Park residents and 1 ongoing resident with rental assistance.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
5 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 5 of 31
IDIS Activity: 481 - Mercy House (Navigation Center)
Project: 0010 - Mercy House Living Centers (Navigation Center) PGM Year: 2023
Description:

Operating Costs of Homeless/AIDS
Patients Programs (03T)
Matrix Code:

Availability/accessibility
Objective: Create suitable living environments
Outcome:

Completed 6/30/2024 12:00:00 AM
6494 Caballero Blvd Buena Park, CA 90620-1128
National Objective: LMC
Status:

Location:

Mercy House Living Centers administers the homeless services provided at the Buena Park Navigation Center.

The Program provides year-round shelter, hygiene facilities, meals, and intensive supportive services to homeless adults.

Services include housing navigation, enrichment activities, health care resources, drug and alcohol treatment referrals, employment placement referrals, and much more.

CDBG funds are used to reimburse a portion of the cost to provide security guards for the facility.

Initial Funding Date: 10/23/2023
Activity to prevent, prepare for, and respond to Coronavirus: No Financing
Fund Type Grant Year Grant Funded Amount Drawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program Year Total

CDBG EN
Total
2020 B20MC060502 $23,820.00 $23,820.00 $23,820.00
$23,820.00 $23,820.00 $23,820.00
Proposed Accomplishments
People (General) : 130
Number assisted:

Actual Accomplishments
Person
Hispanic
2 0
11 1
1 0
0 0
1 2
White: 105
Black/African American:

Asian:

American Indian/Alaskan Native:

Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & White:

Asian White:

Black/African American & White:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & Black/African American:

Other multi-racial:

Asian/Pacific Islander:

Owner
Total Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Renter
Total Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Total
Total Hispanic Total
194
25 12
16 5
1 0
0 0
10 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
6 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 6 of 31
0 0
Total: 123
Hispanic:
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 263
Female-headed Households: 0 0 0
Income Category:

Low Mod
Moderate
Extremely Low
Non Low Moderate
Total
Percent Low/Mod
Owner
0 0
0 0
0 Renter
0 0
0 0
0 Total
0 0
0 0
0 Person
263
0 0
0 263
100.0%
Annual Accomplishments
Years Accomplishment Narrative # Benefitting
2023 Mercy House assists homeless individuals with temporary and permanent housing, employment services, health services, and other services that will help them exit homelessness. CDBG funds are used to reimburse the cost to provide security guards at the Buena Park Navigation Center, which is a temporary homeless shelter. During program year 2023-2024, Mercy House served 263 unduplicated clients that had ties to the City of Buena Park, meaning they were either living on the streets of the City or lived in Buena Park prior to being homeless. In the first quarter, they assisted 159 clients that had ties to the City of Buena Park. During the first quarter, 1 individual exited to a permanent housing destination, 1 individual exited to live with family, and 1 exited to positive institutional settings. In the second quarter, they assisted 43 individuals. During the second quarter, 8 individuals exited to a permanent housing destination, 3 individuals exited to a temporary housing destination, and 1 exited to a positive institutional setting. In the third quarter, Mercy House assisted 46 clients. During this quarter, 19 individuals exited to a permanent housing destination, 4 exited to live with family, and 1 went to long term nursing care. In the fourth quarter, they assisted 15 homeless individuals. During this quarter, 26 individuals exited to a permanent housing destination. Activity is complete.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
7 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 7 of 31
IDIS Activity: 482 - Senior Medical Transportation Program Project: 0007 - Senior Medical Transportation Program
PGM Year: 2023
Description:

Matrix Code: Senior Services (05A)
Availability/accessibility
Objective: Create suitable living environments
Outcome:

Completed 6/30/2024 12:00:00 AM
8150 Knott Ave Buena Park, CA 90620-3159
National Objective: LMC
Status:

Location:

The Senior Transportation Program provides senior Buena Park residents with transportation to non-emergency medical appointments, pharmacies, grocery stores, and the Buena Park Senior Center to participate in their many programs and activities.

CDBG funds are used for part-time driver's salaries and benefits and cell phone expenses.

Initial Funding Date: 10/23/2023
Activity to prevent, prepare for, and respond to Coronavirus: No Financing
Fund Type Grant Year Grant Funded Amount Drawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program Year Total

CDBG EN
Total
2020 B20MC060502 $23,585.63 $23,585.63 $23,585.63
$23,585.63 $23,585.63 $23,585.63
Proposed Accomplishments
People (General) : 325
Number assisted:

Actual Accomplishments
Person
Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
White: 83
Black/African American:

Asian:

American Indian/Alaskan Native:

Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & White:

Asian White:

Black/African American & White:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & Black/African American:

Other multi-racial:

Asian/Pacific Islander:

Hispanic:

Owner
Total Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Renter
Total Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Total
Total Hispanic Total
293
10 33
18 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
8 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 8 of 31
Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 354 83
Female-headed Households: 0 0 0
Income Category:

Low Mod
Moderate
Extremely Low
Non Low Moderate
Total
Percent Low/Mod
Owner
0 0
0 0
0 Renter
0 0
0 0
0 Total
0 0
0 0
0 Person
351
3 0
0 354
100.0%
Annual Accomplishments
Years Accomplishment Narrative # Benefitting
2023 The Senior Medical Transportation Program provided non-emergency transportation services to three-hundred fifty-four (354) unduplicated Buena Park senior residents during program year 2023-2024. During the first quarter, fifty-two (52) residents received transportation services from the program. In the second quarter, eighty-one (81) residents received services from this program. In the third quarter, one-hundred eleven (111) residents received transportation services through the program. During the fourth quarter, the program served one-hundred and ten (110) senior residents. Program staff continue to advertise the program in city newsletters that get mailed to residents, city event information booths, and by calling past participants that may want to apply for the program after not using it for a period of time. Activity is complete.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
9 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 9 of 31
IDIS Activity: 483 - Homeless Outreach Program
Project: 0009 - Homeless Outreach Program (City of Buena Park) PGM Year: 2023
Description:

Operating Costs of Homeless/AIDS
Patients Programs (03T)
Matrix Code:

Availability/accessibility
Objective: Create suitable living environments
Outcome:

Completed 6/30/2024 12:00:00 AM
8150 Knott Ave Buena Park, CA 90620-3159
National Objective: LMC
Status:

Location:

The Homeless Outreach Program provides services to unhoused individuals living in the City of Buena Park.

Its purpose is to make it more accessible for homeless individuals in a suitable living environment.

CDBG funds are used for emergency shelter costs, relocation expenses, transitional program fees, emergency supplies, and local transportation.

Initial Funding Date: 10/23/2023
Activity to prevent, prepare for, and respond to Coronavirus: No Financing
Fund Type Grant Year Grant Funded Amount Drawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program Year Total

CDBG EN
Total
2020 B20MC060502 $17,763.03 $17,763.03 $17,763.03
$17,763.03 $17,763.03 $17,763.03
Proposed Accomplishments
People (General) : 200
Number assisted:

Actual Accomplishments
Person
Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
White: 145
Black/African American:

Asian:

American Indian/Alaskan Native:

Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & White:

Asian White:

Black/African American & White:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & Black/African American:

Other multi-racial:

Asian/Pacific Islander:

Hispanic:

Owner
Total Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Renter
Total Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Total
Total Hispanic Total
329
43 13
0 0
0 0
0 0
17 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
10 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 10 of 31
Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 402 145
Female-headed Households: 0 0 0
Income Category:

Low Mod
Moderate
Extremely Low
Non Low Moderate
Total
Percent Low/Mod
Owner
0 0
0 0
0 Renter
0 0
0 0
0 Total
0 0
0 0
0 Person
402
0 0
0 402
100.0%
Annual Accomplishments
Years Accomplishment Narrative # Benefitting
2023 During the first quarter, the Homeless Outreach team assisted sixty-six (66) unhoused individuals living in Buena Park. During the second quarter, the Homeless Outreach Program assisted one-hundred forty eight (148) unhoused individuals. During the third quarter, the Homeless Outreach Program assisted one-hundred forty three (143) unhoused individuals. During the fourth quarter, the Homeless Outreach Program assisted fourty-five (45) unhoused individuals. The Program assisted a total of 402 unduplicated homeless individuals living in Buena Park or with strong ties to Buena Park (i.e. Buena Park was their primary residence before becoming homeless). Homeless Outreach Program staff assisted homeless individuals by connecting them with the Buena Park Navigation Center for temporary shelter, sponsoring emergency hotel stays, providing one-time grocery assistance, providing local transportation services, sponsoring transportation to reunite them with family that can provide housing, providing one-on-one counseling, and guiding them through other social service processes. Activity is complete.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
11 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 11 of 31
IDIS Activity: 484 - Boys & Girls Club
Project: 0008 - Boys and Girls Club of Buena Park
PGM Year: 2023
Description:

Matrix Code: Youth Services (05D)
Affordability
Objective: Create suitable living environments
Outcome:

Completed 6/30/2024 12:00:00 AM
7758 Knott Ave Buena Park, CA 90620-2420
National Objective: LMC
Status:

Location:

Boys & Girls Club's purpose is to improve the quality of life of Buena Park's youth through a variety of social and recreational programs addressing character and leadership development, the arts, education, career development, health and life skills, sports, fitness, and recreation.

In addition to these services, the program also provides free dental treatments to children who qualify.

CDBG funds are used to reimburse utility costs including electricity, phone, and the internet.

Initial Funding Date: 10/23/2023
Activity to prevent, prepare for, and respond to Coronavirus: No Financing
Fund Type Grant Year Grant Funded Amount Drawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program Year Total

CDBG EN
Total
2020 B20MC060502 $18,100.00 $18,100.00 $18,100.00
$18,100.00 $18,100.00 $18,100.00
Proposed Accomplishments
People (General) : 2,200
Number assisted:

Actual Accomplishments
Person
Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
White: 496
Black/African American:

Asian:

American Indian/Alaskan Native:

Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & White:

Asian White:

Black/African American & White:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & Black/African American:

Other multi-racial:

Asian/Pacific Islander:

Owner
Total Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Renter
Total Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Total
Total Hispanic Total
687
139
153
2 19
0 17
2 0
209
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
12 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 12 of 31
0 0
Total: 496
Hispanic:
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 1,228
Female-headed Households: 0 0 0
Income Category:

Low Mod
Moderate
Extremely Low
Non Low Moderate
Total
Percent Low/Mod
Owner
0 0
0 0
0 Renter
0 0
0 0
0 Total
0 0
0 0
0 Person
243
690
234
61 1,228

95.0%
Annual Accomplishments
Years Accomplishment Narrative # Benefitting
2023 During FY 23-24 the Boys & Girls Club provided services to 1,228 Buena Park children ranging from ages 6-18. Boys & Girls Club expanded their services to 5 different school sites to provide on-site after-school program services. In the first quarter, they assisted 535 children. In the second quarter, they assisted 344 children. In the third quarter, they assisted 131 children. In the fourth quarter, they assisted 218 children.

Some of their most popular programs this year were Woodshop; FITS (Friends Interacting Through Sports) program; Garden Club; and Creative Engineers Club; and many more special events. Activity is complete.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
13 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 13 of 31
IDIS Activity: 485 - Graffiti Removal Program
Project: 0006 - Graffiti Removal
PGM Year: 2023
Description:

Other Public Services Not Listed in
05A-05Y, 03T (05Z)
Matrix Code:

Availability/accessibility
Objective: Create suitable living environments
Outcome:

Completed 6/30/2024 12:00:00 AM
6650 Beach Blvd Buena Park, CA 90621-2905
National Objective: LMA
Status:

Location:

The Graffiti Removal Program proactively and reactively responds to graffiti incidents within the City's CDBG eligible census tracts.

Its purpose is to provide a suitable living environment for Buena Park residents by removing graffiti in residential and commercial areas.

CDBG funds are used to reimburse a portion of staff salaries and benefits.

Initial Funding Date: 10/23/2023
Activity to prevent, prepare for, and respond to Coronavirus: No Financing
Fund Type Grant Year Grant Funded Amount Drawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program Year Total

CDBG EN
Total
2020 B20MC060502 $14,290.00 $14,290.00 $14,290.00
$14,290.00 $14,290.00 $14,290.00
Proposed Accomplishments
People (General) : 2,000
Total Population in Service Area: 60,740
Census Tract Percent Low / Mod: 66.64
Annual Accomplishments
Years Accomplishment Narrative # Benefitting
2023 In the first quarter of FY 23-24, the graffiti removal program removed 625 graffiti instance in the City's low- mod- income census tracts. In the second quarter, they removed 558 instances of graffiti. In the third quarter, they removed 537 instances of graffiti. In the fourth quarter, they removed 577 instances of graffiti. In total, the Graffiti Removal Program crew removed 2,297 graffiti instances within the City's low-income census tracts. Activity is complete.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
14 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 14 of 31
IDIS Activity: 486 - Neighborhood Improvement/Code Enforcement Project: 0005 - Neighborhood Improvement/Code Enforcement PGM Year: 2023
Description:

Matrix Code: Code Enforcement (15)
Sustainability
Objective: Create suitable living environments
Outcome:

Completed 6/30/2024 12:00:00 AM
6650 Beach Blvd Buena Park, CA 90621-2905
National Objective: LMA
Status:

Location:

The Neighborhood ImprovementCode Enforcement Program identifies and responds to building and safety issues in residential and commercial areas to protect residents from living in substandard and unsafe conditions.

Code Enforcement Officers work with resident to rectify code violations through verbal and written communication, site visits, and by referring them to the City's Residential Rehabilitation Program .

The program is limited to eligible low-income Census tracts that are at least 51% low income.

CDBG funds are used to reimburse a portion of staff salaries and benefits for the Program staff.

Initial Funding Date: 10/23/2023
Activity to prevent, prepare for, and respond to Coronavirus: No Financing
Fund Type Grant Year Grant Funded Amount Drawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program Year Total

CDBG EN
Total
2020
2023
B20MC060502
B23MC060502
$29,327.22 $29,327.22 $29,327.22
$177,980.11 $177,980.11 $177,980.11
$207,307.33 $207,307.33 $207,307.33
Proposed Accomplishments
Housing Units : 750
Total Population in Service Area: 60,740
Census Tract Percent Low / Mod: 66.64
Annual Accomplishments
Years Accomplishment Narrative # Benefitting
2023 A total of 639 cases within the City's low income CDBG eligible census tracts were opened during the FY 23-24 reporting period; 365 cases were closed, which includes cases from current and prior program years. during the first quarter, 137 cases were opened and investigated and 83 CDBG cases were closed. During the second quarter, a total of 106 cases were opened and investigated and 60 cases were closed. During the third quarter, 157 cases were opened and investigated and 78 cases were closed. During the fourth quarter, 239 cases were opened and investigated and 144 cases were closed. The City continues to work and investigate rental housing inspections in the Fillmore/Jackson area.

Throughout this program year, the City Prosecutor has worked on eight code enforcement cases that have been pending compliance in Code Enforcement or the court system. Overall, approximately 48 attorney hours have been spent working on Code Enforcement/CDBG area cases during the program year. Activity is complete.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
15 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 15 of 31
IDIS Activity: 487 - Residential Rehabilitation Loans
Project: 0003 - Housing Rehabilitation
PGM Year: 2023
Description:

Matrix Code: Rehab; Single-Unit Residential (14A)
Affordability
Objective: Provide decent affordable housing
Outcome:

Completed 6/30/2024 12:00:00 AM
7600 El Caney Dr Buena Park, CA 90620-1804
National Objective: LMH
Status:

Location:

The Residential Rehabilitation Program offers deferred loans at 1% interest to low- and moderate-income residents to rehabilitate their home and make necessary repairs to comply with local and State health and safety regulations.

Additionally, the Senior Code Enforcement Relief Program (SCERP), which is an extension of the Residential Rehabilitation Program, provides forgivable loans of $15,000 at zero percent (0%) interest to low-income seniors to rectify outstanding code violations.

Initial Funding Date: 10/23/2023
Activity to prevent, prepare for, and respond to Coronavirus: No Financing
Fund Type Grant Year Grant Funded Amount Drawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program Year Total

CDBG EN
PI
Total
2022
2023
B22MC060502
B23MC060502
$95,261.29 $95,261.29 $95,261.29
$2,865.97 $2,865.97 $2,865.97
$38,508.74 $38,508.74 $38,508.74
$136,636.00 $136,636.00 $136,636.00
Proposed Accomplishments
Housing Units : 10
Number assisted:

Actual Accomplishments
Person
Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
White: 0
Black/African American:

Asian:

American Indian/Alaskan Native:

Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & White:

Asian White:

Black/African American & White:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & Black/African American:

Owner
Total Hispanic
5 3
1 0
1 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Renter
Total Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Total
Total Hispanic Total
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 5
1 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
16 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 16 of 31
0 0
0 0
Total: 0
Other multi-racial:

Asian/Pacific Islander:

Hispanic:
9 4
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 9 4 0
Female-headed Households: 0 0 0
Income Category:

Low Mod
Moderate
Extremely Low
Non Low Moderate
Total
Percent Low/Mod
Owner
2 1
6 0
9 100.0%
Renter
0 0
0 0
0 Total
2 1
6 0
9 100.0%
Person
0 0
0 0
0 Annual Accomplishments
Years Accomplishment Narrative # Benefitting
2023 During FY 23-24, 9 low- and moderate-income households received assistance through the Residential Rehabilitation Program. In the first quarter, four applications were under review and two Senior Code Enforcement Relief Program (SCERP) applications were referred by the Neighborhood Improvement/Code Enforcement Program. Program staff worked with applicants to complete applications. Staff also mailed affidavits of occupancy to homeowners with outstanding loans to ensure they are still in compliance with the terms of their loan. In the second quarter, the City completed one SCERP project for a forgivable loan of $11,575 to demolish an unpermitted structure that was connected to the rear of the home. Two other projects were under construction and two projects were pending approval. In the third quarter, The City completed a home improvement project and a SCERP project. The home improvement project was a deferred loan of $18,528, which consisted of exterior paint, electrical panel upgrade, window replacements, and kitchen repairs. The SCERP, which was a forgivable loan or $13,990, consisted of a re-pipe in the entire home to address a code violation regarding her unkept lawn. Their lawn was unkept because there was not enough water pressure in the home to water the lawn due to old pipes. During the fourth quarter, the City completed one home improvement project for a deferred loan of $77,313, which included exterior paint, bathroom renovations, replacement of interior doors, kitchen improvements, and driveway improvements. The City also utilized $15,230 to provide lead testing and lead abatement grants to 5 households. A total of $136,636 was spent on construction and lead hazard costs during the program year. Activity is complete.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
17 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 17 of 31
IDIS Activity: 488 - Fair Housing Foundation
Project: 0002 - Fair Housing Services
PGM Year: 2023
Description:

Fair Housing Activities (subject to
20% Admin Cap) (21D)
Matrix Code:

Objective:

Outcome:

Completed 6/30/2024 12:00:00 AM
,
National Objective:

Status:

Location:

Fair Housing Foundation administers fair housing services for the City of Buena Park.

They provide outreach, education, and legal counseling to address and eliminate impediments to fair housing.

CDBG funds are used to reimburse staff salaries, communication expenses, leasing expenses, insurance expenses, and transportation expenses.

During fiscal year 2023-2024, Fair Housing Foundation assisted 124 Buena Park residents.

During the year the Fair Housing Foundation addressed 20 new fair housing allegations and successfully resolved 18 fair housing cases.

Aside from the one-on-one assistance they offer, they held several online and in-person workshops, attended City events and council meetings, conducted presentations at provided information booths at City Hall, sent direct information mail-outs to renters and landlords, and advertised their services on social media.

Activity is complete.

Initial Funding Date: 10/23/2023
Activity to prevent, prepare for, and respond to Coronavirus: No Financing
Fund Type Grant Year Grant Funded Amount Drawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program Year Total

CDBG EN
Total
2022 B22MC060502 $13,860.00 $13,860.00 $13,860.00
$13,860.00 $13,860.00 $13,860.00
Proposed Accomplishments
Number assisted:

Actual Accomplishments
Person
Hispanic
White:

Black/African American:

Asian:

American Indian/Alaskan Native:

Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & White:

Asian White:

Black/African American & White:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & Black/African American:

Owner
Total Hispanic
Renter
Total Hispanic
Total
Total Hispanic Total
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
18 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 18 of 31
Total: 0
Other multi-racial:

Asian/Pacific Islander:

Hispanic:
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
Female-headed Households: 0
Income Category:

Low Mod
Moderate
Extremely Low
Non Low Moderate
Total
Percent Low/Mod
Owner
0 Renter
0 Total
0 0
0 0
0 Person
0 Annual Accomplishments
No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
19 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 19 of 31
IDIS Activity: 489 - Residential Rehabilitation Program Administration Project: 0004 - Residential Rehabilitation Program Administration PGM Year: 2023
Description:

Matrix Code: Rehabilitation Administration (14H)
Affordability
Objective: Provide decent affordable housing
Outcome:

Completed 6/30/2024 12:00:00 AM
6650 Beach Blvd Buena Park, CA 90621-2905
National Objective: LMH
Status:

Location:

Residential Rehabilitation Program administration includes managing the program waitlist, program marketing, providing program application guidance, income-qualifying homeowners, preparing construction work specifications, construction management, contract management, loan servicing, and related reporting.

CDBG funds are used to reimburse staff salaries and benefits, consultant fees, program supplies, and other maintenance and operation costs.

Initial Funding Date: 10/23/2023
Activity to prevent, prepare for, and respond to Coronavirus: No Financing
Fund Type Grant Year Grant Funded Amount Drawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program Year Total

CDBG EN
PI
Total
2021
2022
B21MC060502
B22MC060502
$67,391.00 $67,391.00 $67,391.00
$113,075.56 $113,075.56 $113,075.56
$19,124.00 $19,124.00 $19,124.00
$199,590.56 $199,590.56 $199,590.56
Proposed Accomplishments
Number assisted:

Actual Accomplishments
Person
Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
White: 0
Black/African American:

Asian:

American Indian/Alaskan Native:

Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & White:

Asian White:

Black/African American & White:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & Black/African American:

Other multi-racial:

Asian/Pacific Islander:

Owner
Total Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Renter
Total Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Total
Total Hispanic Total
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
20 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 20 of 31
0 0
Total: 0
Hispanic:
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
Female-headed Households: 0 0 0
Income Category:

Low Mod
Moderate
Extremely Low
Non Low Moderate
Total
Percent Low/Mod
Owner
0 0
0 0
0 Renter
0 0
0 0
0 Total
0 0
0 0
0 Person
0 0
0 0
0 Annual Accomplishments
Years Accomplishment Narrative # Benefitting
2023 During FY 2023-2024, the Residential Rehabilitation Program assisted 9 households with housing rehabilitation, lead testing, and lead abatement. Program administration consisted of maintaining the program waitlist, assisting homeowners through the application process, project file management, construction management, loan servicing, contract management, and program outreach. The City's community outreach coordinator promoted the program in several City events throughout the year and reached out to over 2,500 seniors. Activity is complete.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
21 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 21 of 31
IDIS Activity: 490 - CDBG Program Administration
Project: 0001 - CDBG Program Administration
PGM Year: 2023
Description:

Matrix Code: General Program Administration (21A)
Objective:

Outcome:

Completed 6/30/2024 12:00:00 AM
,
National Objective:

Status:

Location:

The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program is administered by the City's Community & Economic Development Department.

City staff conduct CDBG program oversight and planning to ensure compliance with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

CDBG Program administration includes grant sub-recipient management and monitoring, preparation of annual plans and reports, preparation of the annual CDBG budget, conducting public meetings, preparing public notices, preparing agenda reports, budget monitoring, and more.

Activity is complete.

Initial Funding Date: 10/23/2023
Activity to prevent, prepare for, and respond to Coronavirus: No Financing
Fund Type Grant Year Grant Funded Amount Drawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program Year Total

CDBG EN
Total
2022 B22MC060502 $117,700.15 $117,700.15 $117,700.15
$117,700.15 $117,700.15 $117,700.15
Proposed Accomplishments
Number assisted:

Actual Accomplishments
Person
Hispanic
White:

Black/African American:

Asian:

American Indian/Alaskan Native:

Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & White:

Asian White:

Black/African American & White:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & Black/African American:

Other multi-racial:

Asian/Pacific Islander:

Hispanic:

Owner
Total Hispanic
Renter
Total Hispanic
Total
Total Hispanic Total
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
22 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 22 of 31
Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Female-headed Households: 0
Income Category:

Low Mod
Moderate
Extremely Low
Non Low Moderate
Total
Percent Low/Mod
Owner
0 Renter
0 Total
0 0
0 0
0 Person
0 Annual Accomplishments
No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
23 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 23 of 31
IDIS Activity: 491 - Buena Park Collaborative (Money Smart) Project: 0011 - Buena Park Collaborative
PGM Year: 2023
Description:

Other Public Services Not Listed in
05A-05Y, 03T (05Z)
Matrix Code:

Availability/accessibility
Objective: Create suitable living environments
Outcome:

Completed 6/30/2024 12:00:00 AM
6601 Beach Blvd Buena Park, CA 90621-2904
National Objective: LMC
Status:

Location:

Buena Park Collaborative's purpose is to provide residents with connections to supportive social services through information and referrals.

Their Money Smart Program (Financially Healthy) provides financial education on budgeting, credit, savings, investing, and more.

The organization partners with other non-profit organizations, worship centers, and the Buena Park school district to conduct training sessions for adults and children.

CDBG funds are used for direct costs in relation to the Money Smart Program, including marketing, telecommunication systems, building lease costs, utilities, insurance costs, payroll expenses, office supplies, education and training material, printing costs, and consulting services.

Initial Funding Date: 10/23/2023
Activity to prevent, prepare for, and respond to Coronavirus: No Financing
Fund Type Grant Year Grant Funded Amount Drawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program Year Total

CDBG EN
Total
2022 B22MC060502 $6,670.00 $6,670.00 $6,670.00
$6,670.00 $6,670.00 $6,670.00
Proposed Accomplishments
People (General) : 175
Number assisted:

Actual Accomplishments
Person
Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 White: 0
Black/African American:

Asian:

American Indian/Alaskan Native:

Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & White:

Asian White:

Black/African American & White:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & Black/African American:

Other multi-racial:

Owner
Total Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Renter
Total Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Total
Total Hispanic Total
39 63
6 0
0 0
0 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
24 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 24 of 31
0 0
0 Total: 0
Asian/Pacific Islander:

Hispanic:
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 112
Female-headed Households: 0 0 0
Income Category:

Low Mod
Moderate
Extremely Low
Non Low Moderate
Total
Percent Low/Mod
Owner
0 0
0 0
0 Renter
0 0
0 0
0 Total
0 0
0 0
0 Person
37 23
34 18
112

83.9%
Annual Accomplishments
Years Accomplishment Narrative # Benefitting
2023 Fiscal Year 2023-2024 was Buena Park Collaborative's second year administering the Money Smart Program.In the first quarter, the Program assisted 6 Buena Park residents. During the second quarter, the program assisted 34 Buena Park residents. During the third quarter, the program assisted 42 Buena Park residents. During the fourth quarter, the program assisted 56 Buena Park residents. Throughout the year, the program benefitted 112 Buena Park residents. The program was marketed at community events and on social media. Some residents received one-on-one services while others attended group training sessions. Activity is complete.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
25 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 25 of 31
IDIS Activity: 492 - Friendly Center (Community Resource Center) Project: 0012 - Friendly Center
PGM Year: 2023
Description:

Other Public Services Not Listed in
05A-05Y, 03T (05Z)
Matrix Code:

Availability/accessibility
Objective: Create suitable living environments
Outcome:

Completed 6/30/2024 12:00:00 AM
6688 Beach Blvd Buena Park, CA 90621-2905
National Objective: LMC
Status:

Location:

Friendly Center offers free resources and support to low income residents.

They offer stability programs, which encompass food distribution, case managements, mental health counseling, utility and rental assistance, and other referral services.

Additionally, they offer skill building programs such as after-school tutoring, job development assistance, and financial literacy workshops.

Initial Funding Date: 10/23/2023
Activity to prevent, prepare for, and respond to Coronavirus: No Financing
Fund Type Grant Year Grant Funded Amount Drawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program Year Total

CDBG EN
Total
2022 B22MC060502 $6,670.00 $6,670.00 $6,670.00
$6,670.00 $6,670.00 $6,670.00
Proposed Accomplishments
People (General) : 562
Number assisted:

Actual Accomplishments
Person
Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
White: 411
Black/African American:

Asian:

American Indian/Alaskan Native:

Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & White:

Asian White:

Black/African American & White:

American Indian/Alaskan Native & Black/African American:

Other multi-racial:

Asian/Pacific Islander:

Hispanic:

Owner
Total Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Renter
Total Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Total
Total Hispanic Total
439
0 31
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
26 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 26 of 31
Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 470 411
Female-headed Households: 0 0 0
Income Category:

Low Mod
Moderate
Extremely Low
Non Low Moderate
Total
Percent Low/Mod
Owner
0 0
0 0
0 Renter
0 0
0 0
0 Total
0 0
0 0
0 Person
444
26 0
0 470
100.0%
Annual Accomplishments
Years Accomplishment Narrative # Benefitting
2023 FY 2023-2024 was the first year that the City has provided CDBG funding to Friendly Center. In the first quarter, Friendly center assisted 142 residents through their programs. In the second quarter they assisted 107 residents. In the third quarter they helped 88 unduplicated residents with their food program and other referral services. In the fourth quarter, they provided services to 133 low-income Buena Park residents.

Friendly Center receives a large amount of calls and inquiries on a day-to-day basis. Although they offer assistance to many residents by referring them to other organizations or spending time providing them information, they are not always able to obtain their demographic information in order to count them in the report. Furthermore, many residents that receive help from them are being assisted more than once but can only be counted once. Friendly Center continuously advertise their services on social media and flyers to spread the word about their programs and expand their clientele.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
27 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 27 of 31
IDIS Activity: 493 - Smith Murphy Park Accessibility Improvements Project: 0013 - Smith Murphy Park & Carl Brenner Park ADA Improvements PGM Year: 2023
Description:

Matrix Code: Parks, Recreational Facilities (03F)
Availability/accessibility
Objective: Create suitable living environments
Outcome:

Open
5290 Cameron Drive Buena Park, CA 90621
National Objective: LMA
Status:

Location:

The project include ADA compliant accessibility improvements to Smith Murphy Park, 5290 Cameron Drive, Buena Park, CA 90621.

The project is meant to enhance the The improvements include ADA compliant wheelchair ramps, accessible handicap parking, hi-lo drinking fountains, ADA compliant picnic tables and benches, and improvements to the restroom interior fixtures.

These improvements would ensure that handicapped individuals can fully participate ad benefit from the park.

The project includes engineering and design costs as well as construction costs.

Initial Funding Date: 10/23/2023
Activity to prevent, prepare for, and respond to Coronavirus: No Financing
Fund Type Grant Year Grant Funded Amount Drawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program Year Total

CDBG EN
Total
2021 B21MC060502 $304,720.00 $16,690.00 $16,690.00
$304,720.00 $16,690.00 $16,690.00
Proposed Accomplishments
Public Facilities : 1
Total Population in Service Area: 2,800
Census Tract Percent Low / Mod: 53.04
Annual Accomplishments
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
28 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 28 of 31
Years Accomplishment Narrative # Benefitting
2023 During the first quarter of FY 2023-2024, the City awarded Oldham Architects with $16,690 to provide plans for the Smith Murphy Park Accessibility Improvement projects. By the end of the first quarter, Oldham Architects submitted 90% plans to the City for review. The City paid Oldham Architects $15,021 during this quarter. During the second quarter, Oldham Architects provided 100% plans to the City along with the cost estimates. Public Works staff reviewed the plans and provided comments about the plans. During the 3rd quarter, Oldham Architects submitted revised plans and the City publicly advertised the bid solicitation for the project in February 2024. During the bid process, City staff notified the Building & Construction Trades Council and the Supplier Clearinghouse to reach out to Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) programs. The City publicly opened bids on March 28, 2024. Out of the six bids received, the lowest bidder greatly exceeded the project budget.

During the 4th quarter, the City consulted with Oldham Architects to re-evaluate the project's work scope to fit within the project budget. The engineer's new estimate was $780,000 for 2 parks. The City paid Oldham Architects $1,669 during the 4th quarter as a final payment for the completed plans. On May 13, 2024, the project was publicly advertised for bids. On May 29, 2024, three bids were received and publicly opened. The construction of this project was awarded to Aguilar & Calderon Corporation in the amount of $778,611.66 at the City Council meeting on June 11, 2024. On June 26, 2024, a pre-construction meeting was held between City staff and Aguilar & Calderon to discuss City requirements and federal requirements for the project including Davis Bacon prevailing wage and Section 3. The projects was set to start construction on July 15, 2024 and be completed by September 2024.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
29 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 29 of 31
IDIS Activity: 494 - Carl Brenner Park Accessibility Improvements Project: 0013 - Smith Murphy Park & Carl Brenner Park ADA Improvements PGM Year: 2023
Description:

Matrix Code: Parks, Recreational Facilities (03F)
Availability/accessibility
Objective: Create suitable living environments
Outcome:

Open
7401 Ridgeway Dr 7373 San Rafael Drive Buena Park, CA
90620-1418 National Objective: LMA
Status:

Location:

The project includes ADA compliant accessibility improvements to existing park facilities and structures at Carl Brenner Park, 7373 San Rafael Drive, Buena Park, CA 90620.

The improvements include ADA compliant wheelchair ramps, accessible handicap parking, hi-lo drinking fountains, ADA compliant picnic tables and benches, and improvements to the restroom fixtures.

These improvements would ensure that handicapped individuals can fully participate ad benefit from the park.

The project includes engineering and design costs as well as construction costs.

Initial Funding Date: 10/23/2023
Activity to prevent, prepare for, and respond to Coronavirus: No Financing
Fund Type Grant Year Grant Funded Amount Drawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program Year Total

CDBG EN
Total
2021 B21MC060502 $304,720.00 $16,690.00 $16,690.00
$304,720.00 $16,690.00 $16,690.00
Proposed Accomplishments
Public Facilities : 1
Total Population in Service Area: 1,420
Census Tract Percent Low / Mod: 51.76
Annual Accomplishments
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
30 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 30 of 31
Years Accomplishment Narrative # Benefitting
2023 During the first quarter of FY 2023-2024, the City awarded Oldham Architects with $16,690 to provide plans for the Carl Brenner Park Accessibility Improvement projects. By the end of the first quarter, Oldham Architects submitted 90% plans to the City for review. The City paid Oldham Architects $15,021 during this quarter. During the second quarter, Oldham Architects provided 100% plans to the City along with the cost estimates. Public Works staff reviewed the plans and provided comments about the plans. During the 3rd quarter, Oldham Architects submitted revised plans and the City publicly advertised the bid solicitation for the project in February 2024. During the bid process, City staff notified the Building & Construction Trades Council and the Supplier Clearinghouse to reach out to Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) programs. The City publicly opened bids on March 28, 2024. Out of the six bids received, the lowest bidder greatly exceeded the project budget.

During the 4th quarter, the City consulted with Oldham Architects to re-evaluate the project's work scope to fit within the project budget. The engineer's new estimate was $780,000 for 2 parks. The City paid Oldham Architects $1,669 during the 4th quarter as a final payment for the completed plans. On May 13, 2024, the project was publicly advertised for bids. On May 29, 2024, three bids were received and publicly opened. The construction of this project was awarded to Aguilar & Calderon Corporation in the amount of $778,611.66 at the City Council meeting on June 11, 2024. On June 26, 2024, a pre-construction meeting was held between City staff and Aguilar & Calderon to discuss City requirements and federal requirements for the project including Davis Bacon prevailing wage and Section 3. The projects was set to start construction on July 15, 2024 and be completed by September 2024.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11-Sep-2024 14:08
31 Date:

Time:

Page:

Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK
PR03 - BUENA PARK Page: 31 of 31
$9,735,974.81
$843,687.70
$9,051,074.10
Total Funded Amount:

Total Drawn In Program Year:

Total Drawn Thru Program Year:

PR26 - CDBG Financial Summary Report
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
DATE:

TIME:

PAGE: 1
20:59
09-04-24
Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK , CA
Metrics
Grantee
Program Year
PART I: SUMMARY OF CDBG RESOURCES
01 UNEXPENDED CDBG FUNDS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 02 ENTITLEMENT GRANT
03 SURPLUS URBAN RENEWAL
04 SECTION 108 GUARANTEED LOAN FUNDS
05 CURRENT YEAR PROGRAM INCOME
05a CURRENT YEAR SECTION 108 PROGRAM INCOME (FOR SI TYPE) 06 FUNDS RETURNED TO THE LINE-OF-CREDIT
06a FUNDS RETURNED TO THE LOCAL CDBG ACCOUNT
07 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL AVAILABLE
08 TOTAL AVAILABLE (SUM, LINES 01-07)
PART II: SUMMARY OF CDBG EXPENDITURES
09 DISBURSEMENTS OTHER THAN SECTION 108 REPAYMENTS AND PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION 10 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL AMOUNT SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT 11 AMOUNT SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT (LINE 09 + LINE 10) 12 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION
13 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR SECTION 108 REPAYMENTS
14 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL EXPENDITURES
15 TOTAL EXPENDITURES (SUM, LINES 11-14)
16 UNEXPENDED BALANCE (LINE 08 - LINE 15)
PART III: LOWMOD BENEFIT THIS REPORTING PERIOD
17 EXPENDED FOR LOW/MOD HOUSING IN SPECIAL AREAS
18 EXPENDED FOR LOW/MOD MULTI-UNIT HOUSING
19 DISBURSED FOR OTHER LOW/MOD ACTIVITIES
20 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL LOW/MOD CREDIT
21 TOTAL LOW/MOD CREDIT (SUM, LINES 17-20)
22 PERCENT LOW/MOD CREDIT (LINE 21/LINE 11)

LOW/MOD BENEFIT FOR MULTI-YEAR CERTIFICATIONS
23 PROGRAM YEARS(PY) COVERED IN CERTIFICATION
24 CUMULATIVE NET EXPENDITURES SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT CALCULATION 25 CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES BENEFITING LOW/MOD PERSONS
26 PERCENT BENEFIT TO LOW/MOD PERSONS (LINE 25/LINE 24) PART IV: PUBLIC SERVICE (PS) CAP CALCULATIONS
27 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PUBLIC SERVICES
28 PS UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF CURRENT PROGRAM YEAR 29 PS UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 30 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL PS OBLIGATIONS
31 TOTAL PS OBLIGATIONS (LINE 27 + LINE 28 - LINE 29 + LINE 30) 32 ENTITLEMENT GRANT
33 PRIOR YEAR PROGRAM INCOME
34 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL SUBJECT TO PS CAP
35 TOTAL SUBJECT TO PS CAP (SUM, LINES 32-34)
36 PERCENT FUNDS OBLIGATED FOR PS ACTIVITIES (LINE 31/LINE 35) PART V: PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION (PA) CAP
37 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION
38 PA UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF CURRENT PROGRAM YEAR 39 PA UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 40 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL PA OBLIGATIONS
41 TOTAL PA OBLIGATIONS (LINE 37 + LINE 38 - LINE 39 +LINE 40) 42 ENTITLEMENT GRANT
43 CURRENT YEAR PROGRAM INCOME
44 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL SUBJECT TO PA CAP
45 TOTAL SUBJECT TO PA CAP (SUM, LINES 42-44)
46 PERCENT FUNDS OBLIGATED FOR PA ACTIVITIES (LINE 41/LINE 45)

BUENA PARK , CA
2,023.00
1,407,395.72
749,820.00

0.00 0.00
57,632.74

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
2,214,848.46
687,812.55

0.00 687,812.55
131,560.15

0.00 0.00
819,372.70
1,395,475.76

0.00 0.00
687,812.55

0.00 687,812.55
100.00%
PY: PY: PY:

0.00 0.00

0.00%
110,898.66

0.00 0.00

0.00 110,898.66
749,820.00
260,283.67

0.00 1,010,103.67

10.98%
131,560.15

0.00 0.00

0.00 131,560.15
749,820.00
57,632.74

0.00 807,452.74

16.29%
Attachment 5
PR26 - CDBG Financial Summary Report
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
DATE:

TIME:

PAGE: 2
20:59
09-04-24
Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK , CA
LINE 17 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES TO CONSIDER IN DETERMINING THE AMOUNT TO ENTER ON LINE 17 No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data.

LINE 18 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES TO CONSIDER IN DETERMINING THE AMOUNT TO ENTER ON LINE 18 No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data.

LINE 19 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES INCLUDED IN THE COMPUTATION OF LINE 19 Plan
Year
IDIS
Project
IDIS
Activity
Voucher
Number Activity Name MatrixCode
National
Objective Drawn Amount
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
13 13
13 13
9 9
9 9
9 10
10 10
7 7
7 7
7 8
8 8
8 6
6 6
11 11
11 11
12 12
12 3
3 3
3 3
4 4
4 4
4 5
493
493
494
494
483
483
483
483
483
481
481
481
482
482
482
482
482
484
484
484
484
485
485
485
491
491
491
491
492
492
492
487
487
487
487
487
489
489
489
489
489
486
6871077
6935571
6871077
6935571
6836961
6871077
6888514
6893983
6935571
6836961
6888514
6935571
6836961
6871077
6888514
6893983
6935571
6836961
6888514
6893983
6935571
6836961
6871077
6888514
6836961
6888514
6893983
6935571
6836961
6888514
6893983
6836961
6871077
6888514
6893983
6935571
6836961
6871077
6888514
6893983
6935571
6836961
Smith Murphy Park Accessibility Improvements
Smith Murphy Park Accessibility Improvements
Carl Brenner Park Accessibility Improvements
Carl Brenner Park Accessibility Improvements
Homeless Outreach Program
Homeless Outreach Program
Homeless Outreach Program
Homeless Outreach Program
Homeless Outreach Program
Mercy House (Navigation Center)
Mercy House (Navigation Center)
Mercy House (Navigation Center)
Senior Medical Transportation Program
Senior Medical Transportation Program
Senior Medical Transportation Program
Senior Medical Transportation Program
Senior Medical Transportation Program
Boys & Girls Club
Boys & Girls Club
Boys & Girls Club
Boys & Girls Club
Graffiti Removal Program
Graffiti Removal Program
Graffiti Removal Program
Buena Park Collaborative (Money Smart)
Buena Park Collaborative (Money Smart)
Buena Park Collaborative (Money Smart)
Buena Park Collaborative (Money Smart)
Friendly Center (Community Resource Center)
Friendly Center (Community Resource Center)
Friendly Center (Community Resource Center)
Residential Rehabilitation Loans
Residential Rehabilitation Loans
Residential Rehabilitation Loans
Residential Rehabilitation Loans
Residential Rehabilitation Loans
Residential Rehabilitation Program Administration
Residential Rehabilitation Program Administration
Residential Rehabilitation Program Administration
Residential Rehabilitation Program Administration
Residential Rehabilitation Program Administration
Neighborhood Improvement/Code Enforcement
03F
03F
03F
03F
03F
03T
03T
03T
03T
03T
03T
03T
03T
03T
05A
05A
05A
05A
05A
05A
05D
05D
05D
05D
05D
05Z
05Z
05Z
05Z
05Z
05Z
05Z
05Z
05Z
05Z
05Z
14A
14A
14A
14A
14A
14A
14H
14H
14H
14H
14H
14H
15 LMA
LMA
LMA
LMA
Matrix Code 03F
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
Matrix Code 03T
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
Matrix Code 05A
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
Matrix Code 05D
LMA
LMA
LMA
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
Matrix Code 05Z
LMH
LMH
LMH
LMH
LMH
Matrix Code 14A
LMH
LMH
LMH
LMH
LMH
Matrix Code 14H
LMA
$15,021.00
$1,669.00
$15,021.00
$1,669.00
$33,380.00
$5,925.66
$467.55
$1,509.50
$119.78
$9,740.54
$5,955.00
$11,910.00
$5,955.00
$41,583.03
$6,605.24
$4,543.74
$5,497.98
$1,941.39
$4,997.28
$23,585.63
$4,675.74
$4,512.03
$4,721.99
$4,190.24
$18,100.00
$8,718.17
$4,755.46
$816.37
$2,336.22
$885.76
$2,822.23
$625.79
$2,007.14
$2,666.27
$1,996.59
$27,630.00
$1,350.00
$12,320.00
$33,370.00
$3,140.00
$86,456.00
$136,636.00
$54,617.35
$37,262.13
$47,179.25
$18,081.45
$42,450.38
$199,590.56
$54,932.60
PR26 - CDBG Financial Summary Report
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
DATE:

TIME:

PAGE: 3
20:59
09-04-24
Program Year 2023

BUENA PARK , CA
Plan
Year
IDIS
Project
IDIS
Activity
Voucher
Number Activity Name MatrixCode
National
Objective Drawn Amount
2023
2023
2023
2023
Total
5 5
5 5
486
486
486
486
6871077
6888514
6893983
6935571
Neighborhood Improvement/Code Enforcement
Neighborhood Improvement/Code Enforcement
Neighborhood Improvement/Code Enforcement
Neighborhood Improvement/Code Enforcement
15 15
15 15
15 LMA
LMA
LMA
LMA
Matrix Code 15
$34,521.63
$47,067.58
$17,258.04
$53,527.48
$207,307.33
$687,812.55
LINE 27 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES INCLUDED IN THE COMPUTATION OF LINE 27 Plan
Year
IDIS
Project
IDIS
Activity
Voucher
Number
Activity to
prevent,
prepare for,
and respond
to
Coronavirus
Activity Name Grant Number Fund
Type
Matrix
Code
National
Objective
Drawn Amount
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
Total
9 9
9 9
9 10
10 10
7 7
7 7
7 8
8 8
8 6
6 6
11 11
11 11
12 12
12 483
483
483
483
483
481
481
481
482
482
482
482
482
484
484
484
484
485
485
485
491
491
491
491
492
492
492
6836961
6871077
6888514
6893983
6935571
6836961
6888514
6935571
6836961
6871077
6888514
6893983
6935571
6836961
6888514
6893983
6935571
6836961
6871077
6888514
6836961
6888514
6893983
6935571
6836961
6888514
6893983
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Homeless Outreach Program
Homeless Outreach Program
Homeless Outreach Program
Homeless Outreach Program
Homeless Outreach Program
Mercy House (Navigation Center)
Mercy House (Navigation Center)
Mercy House (Navigation Center)
Senior Medical Transportation Program
Senior Medical Transportation Program
Senior Medical Transportation Program
Senior Medical Transportation Program
Senior Medical Transportation Program
Boys & Girls Club
Boys & Girls Club
Boys & Girls Club
Boys & Girls Club
Graffiti Removal Program
Graffiti Removal Program
Graffiti Removal Program
Buena Park Collaborative (Money Smart)
Buena Park Collaborative (Money Smart)
Buena Park Collaborative (Money Smart)
Buena Park Collaborative (Money Smart)
Friendly Center (Community Resource Center)
Friendly Center (Community Resource Center)
Friendly Center (Community Resource Center)
Activity to prevent, prepare for, and respond to Coronavirus B20MC060502
B20MC060502
B20MC060502
B20MC060502
B20MC060502
B20MC060502
B20MC060502
B20MC060502
B20MC060502
B20MC060502
B20MC060502
B20MC060502
B20MC060502
B20MC060502
B20MC060502
B20MC060502
B20MC060502
B20MC060502
B20MC060502
B20MC060502
B22MC060502
B22MC060502
B22MC060502
B22MC060502
B22MC060502
B22MC060502
B22MC060502
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
EN
03T
03T
03T
03T
03T
03T
03T
03T
03T
05A
05A
05A
05A
05A
05A
05D
05D
05D
05D
05D
05Z
05Z
05Z
05Z
05Z
05Z
05Z
05Z
05Z
05Z
05Z
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
Matrix Code 03T
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
Matrix Code 05A
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
Matrix Code 05D
LMA
LMA
LMA
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
Matrix Code 05Z
$5,925.66
$467.55
$1,509.50
$119.78
$9,740.54
$5,955.00
$11,910.00
$5,955.00
$41,583.03
$6,605.24
$4,543.74
$5,497.98
$1,941.39
$4,997.28
$23,585.63
$4,675.74
$4,512.03
$4,721.99
$4,190.24
$18,100.00
$8,718.17
$4,755.46
$816.37
$2,336.22
$885.76
$2,822.23
$625.79
$2,007.14
$2,666.27
$1,996.59
$27,630.00
$110,898.66
$110,898.66
LINE 37 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES INCLUDED IN THE COMPUTATION OF LINE 37 Plan
Year
IDIS
Project
IDIS
Activity
Voucher
Number Activity Name MatrixCode
National
Objective Drawn Amount
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
Total
1 1
1 1
1 2
2 2
2 2
490
490
490
490
490
488
488
488
488
488
6836961
6871077
6888514
6893983
6935571
6836961
6871077
6888514
6893983
6935571
CDBG Program Administration
CDBG Program Administration
CDBG Program Administration
CDBG Program Administration
CDBG Program Administration
Fair Housing Foundation
Fair Housing Foundation
Fair Housing Foundation
Fair Housing Foundation
Fair Housing Foundation
21A
21A
21A
21A
21A
21A
21D
21D
21D
21D
21D
21D
Matrix Code 21A
Matrix Code 21D
$34,313.86
$21,013.75
$26,866.52
$12,294.77
$23,211.25
$117,700.15
$4,004.10
$2,393.13
$3,427.80
$1,021.63
$3,013.34
$13,860.00
$131,560.15
PR26 - CDBG-CV Financial Summary Report
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
DATE:

TIME:

PAGE: 1
21:01
09-04-24

BUENA PARK , CA
Metrics
New Grantee (CV)
PART I: SUMMARY OF CDBG-CV RESOURCES
01 CDBG-CV GRANT
02 FUNDS RETURNED TO THE LINE-OF-CREDIT
03 FUNDS RETURNED TO THE LOCAL CDBG ACCOUNT
04 TOTAL CDBG-CV FUNDS AWARDED
PART II: SUMMARY OF CDBG-CV EXPENDITURES
05 DISBURSEMENTS OTHER THAN SECTION 108 REPAYMENTS AND PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION 06 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION
07 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR SECTION 108 REPAYMENTS
08 TOTAL EXPENDITURES (SUM, LINES 05 - 07)
09 UNEXPENDED BALANCE (LINE 04 - LINE8 )
PART III: LOWMOD BENEFIT FOR THE CDBG-CV GRANT
10 EXPENDED FOR LOW/MOD HOUSING IN SPECIAL AREAS
11 EXPENDED FOR LOW/MOD MULTI-UNIT HOUSING
12 DISBURSED FOR OTHER LOW/MOD ACTIVITIES
13 TOTAL LOW/MOD CREDIT (SUM, LINES 10 - 12)
14 AMOUNT SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT (LINE 05)
15 PERCENT LOW/MOD CREDIT (LINE 13/LINE 14)
PART IV: PUBLIC SERVICE (PS) CALCULATIONS
16 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PUBLIC SERVICES
17 CDBG-CV GRANT
18 PERCENT OF FUNDS DISBURSED FOR PS ACTIVITIES (LINE 16/LINE 17) PART V: PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION (PA) CAP
19 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION
20 CDBG-CV GRANT
21 PERCENT OF FUNDS DISBURSED FOR PA ACTIVITIES (LINE 19/LINE 20)

BUENA PARK , CA

1,397,359.00

0.00 0.00
1,397,359.00

1,154,790.33
109,868.00

0.00 1,264,658.33
132,700.67

0.00 0.00
1,154,790.33
1,154,790.33
1,154,790.33
100.00%

747,299.64
1,397,359.00

53.48%

109,868.00
1,397,359.00

7.86%
PR26 - CDBG-CV Financial Summary Report
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
DATE:

TIME:

PAGE: 2
21:01
09-04-24

BUENA PARK , CA
LINE 10 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES TO CONSIDER IN DETERMINING THE AMOUNT TO ENTER ON LINE 10 No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data.

LINE 11 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES TO CONSIDER IN DETERMINING THE AMOUNT TO ENTER ON LINE 11 No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data.

LINE 12 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES INCLUDED IN THE COMPUTATION OF LINE 12 Plan Year IDIS Project IDIS
Activity
Voucher
Number Activity Name MatrixCode
National
Objective Drawn Amount
2020
Total
12 13
441
453
454
455
457
6412249
6457487
6490885
6510905
6539134
6597005
6645656
6668771
6732546
6758118
6809920
6836961
6871077
6888514
6893983
6935571
6510905
6539134
6597005
6645656
6510905
6539134
6597005
6645656
6668771
6732546
6758315
6809920
6539134
6597005
6645656
6668771
COVID Small Business Grant Program
COVID Small Business Grant Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Utility Assistance
CDBG-CV Utility Assistance
CDBG-CV Utility Assistance
CDBG-CV Utility Assistance
CDBG-CV Homeless Outreach
CDBG-CV Homeless Outreach
CDBG-CV Homeless Outreach
CDBG-CV Homeless Outreach
CDBG-CV Homeless Outreach
CDBG-CV Homeless Outreach
CDBG-CV Homeless Outreach
CDBG-CV Homeless Outreach
CDBG-CV Child Care Assistance
CDBG-CV Child Care Assistance
CDBG-CV Child Care Assistance
CDBG-CV Child Care Assistance
18A
18A
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
03T
03T
03T
03T
03T
03T
03T
03T
05D
05D
05D
05D
LMJ
LMJ
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
$376,386.36
$31,104.33
$111,810.00
$69,455.18
$1,350.00
$93,481.67
$22,342.00
$3,956.00
$34,019.00
$4,500.00
$5,975.00
$12,000.00
$8,925.00
$1,130.00
$1,130.00
$1,130.00
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
$2,299.37
$656.07
$2,631.07
$1,442.32
$57,022.90
$28,604.10
$10,070.38
$72,846.49
$22,406.17
$41,207.77
$30,619.62
$69,734.09
$22,456.29
$12,099.15
$1,154,790.33
LINE 16 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES INCLUDED IN THE COMPUTATION OF LINE 16 PR26 - CDBG-CV Financial Summary Report
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
DATE:

TIME:

PAGE: 3
21:01
09-04-24

BUENA PARK , CA
Plan Year IDIS Project IDIS
Activity
Voucher
Number Activity Name MatrixCode
National
Objective Drawn Amount
2020
Total
13 453
454
455
457
6490885
6510905
6539134
6597005
6645656
6668771
6732546
6758118
6809920
6836961
6871077
6888514
6893983
6935571
6510905
6539134
6597005
6645656
6510905
6539134
6597005
6645656
6668771
6732546
6758315
6809920
6539134
6597005
6645656
6668771
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Rental Assistance Program
CDBG-CV Utility Assistance
CDBG-CV Utility Assistance
CDBG-CV Utility Assistance
CDBG-CV Utility Assistance
CDBG-CV Homeless Outreach
CDBG-CV Homeless Outreach
CDBG-CV Homeless Outreach
CDBG-CV Homeless Outreach
CDBG-CV Homeless Outreach
CDBG-CV Homeless Outreach
CDBG-CV Homeless Outreach
CDBG-CV Homeless Outreach
CDBG-CV Child Care Assistance
CDBG-CV Child Care Assistance
CDBG-CV Child Care Assistance
CDBG-CV Child Care Assistance
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
05Q
03T
03T
03T
03T
03T
03T
03T
03T
05D
05D
05D
05D
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
LMC
$111,810.00
$69,455.18
$1,350.00
$93,481.67
$22,342.00
$3,956.00
$34,019.00
$4,500.00
$5,975.00
$12,000.00
$8,925.00
$1,130.00
$1,130.00
$1,130.00
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
$2,299.37
$656.07
$2,631.07
$1,442.32
$57,022.90
$28,604.10
$10,070.38
$72,846.49
$22,406.17
$41,207.77
$30,619.62
$69,734.09
$22,456.29
$12,099.15
$747,299.64
LINE 19 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES INCLUDED IN THE COMPUTATION OF LINE 19 Plan Year IDIS Project IDIS
Activity
Voucher
Number Activity Name MatrixCode
National
Objective Drawn Amount
2020
Total
14 456 6490885
6510905
6539134
6597005
6645656
6668771
6732546
CDBG-CV Administration
CDBG-CV Administration
CDBG-CV Administration
CDBG-CV Administration
CDBG-CV Administration
CDBG-CV Administration
CDBG-CV Administration
21A
21A
21A
21A
21A
21A
21A
$32,089.76
$24,190.61
$8,618.58
$17,502.35
$13,341.33
$3,815.02
$10,310.35
$109,868.00
City of Buena Park
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report

DISCUSS AND PROVIDE DIRECTION ON PROPOSED UPGRADES TO CITY HALL AND EHLERS MARQUEE SIGNS

AND COUNCIL CHAMBER PROJECTOR/DISPLAY
Meeting
Tuesday, September 24, 2024, 5:00 PM
Agenda Group
STUDY SESSION Item: 9A
Presented By
Joe Hunt, Public Works Manager
Prepared By
Mina Mikhael, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Approved By
Aaron France, City Manager

DISCUSSION
The marquee sign in front of the Civic Center on Beach Boulevard was installed during construction of the Police Department in 2009. The sign consists of a monument structure with a Daktronics color LED display on each side of the monument structure, measuring approximately 60"x120" with an LED density of 20mm. In recent months, the marquee sign has become unreliable and frequently requires a reboot to restore functionality. Staff contacted four vendors to provide proposals to either repair or replace the Daktronics LED displays while retaining the monument structure itself.

Marquee Sign - Proposals #1 and #2
National Sign Company was the original designer of the existing marquee sign, although they did not win the bid to actually construct it. National Sign Company, through their installation partner CS Signs, provided two proposals to replace the Daktronics LED displays while retaining the existing monument. Both proposals would provide significantly higher resolution displays than the existing, which has 20mm spacing between each LED. Both options would be models from i5LED, which have 5.3mm of spacing for a denser and clearer picture and brightness of 6,500 nits. Proposal #1 is for a 75"x126" display and would cost approximately $194,157.70 and would include removing the existing display and installing the new one. Proposal #2 is the same scope of work but for a 87.5"x 125" display and would cost approximately $204,312.86. The display carries a three-year warranty for parts and one-year warranty for labor.

Fluoresco Services was the original installer of the existing marquee sign, but they shut down operations in California in the process of preparing a proposal for the City. Fluoresco Services referred the City to Swain Sign Company, who completed a site visit on September 10, 2024, and found that the sign controller needs replacement.

Swain Sign Company was unable to source the display controller and provide a proposal prior to publication of the Agenda but are still working to provide to staff. Parts availability for the 15-year-old Daktronics display is limited and if other components fail there is no guarantee the sign could be brought back to working order.

Marquee Sign - Proposal #3
Finally, staff contacted local Buena Park small business, IYAGI Entertainment. IYAGI Entertainment installed two very large displays at a local sports bar and primarily provides displays wholesale to various vendors and installers.

Proposal #3 from IYAGI Entertainment would wrap a 360-degree seamless LED display around the existing monument structure along with LED-backlit lettering and LED strip lighting accents for $86,830.53. The letters and accent lighting would be programmable and could be configured to be warm white by default and different colors to match seasons or holidays as desired. In total, the 360-degree display would measure 78" tall and 551" wide. The front and back of the sign would have 216.5" of display space and the sides would have 59" of display space. The high-resolution display would have 6.25mm of spacing between each LED with brightness rated at 7,000 nits. IYAGI Entertainment offers a five-year warranty on parts and labor. As proposed, IYAGI Entertainment did not include removal of the existing Daktronics displays in their project scope, so total project costs would increase with this option.

The marquee sign in front of the Ehlers Event Center was installed in 2013. The sign consists of a monument structure with a Yesco color LED display on each side of the monument measuring at approximately 70"x144" with an LED density of 20mm. This marquee has not had significant operational issues and is in working order. However, if a replacement was desired, costs are expected to be similar to proposals received for the City Hall marquee.

Council Chamber Projector/Display - Proposal #1
In addition to the outdoor marquees, staff also solicited proposals from two vendors for an indoor LED display to replace the projector in the Council Chamber. Both proposals are for a direct-view display made up of small bezelless LED panels that are assembled to create one large seamless display. If repairs are necessary in the future, a faulty LED panel could be swapped out for a replacement without replacing the entire display.

Western Audio and Visual is the City's typical vendor for A/V equipment in the Council Chamber. Proposal #1 is to replace the projector with a 146" display from Samsung for $109,128.60 including installation. The display would have an effective resolution of 1920x1080, with 1.6mm spacing between each LED. Samsung offers a three-year warranty on parts and Western Audio Visual offers an additional extended warranty and maintenance renewal schedule of $6,403.00/year for the display and other equipment in the room up to 5 years.

Council Chamber Projector/Display - Proposal #2
IYAGI Entertainment provided Proposal #2 to replace the projector with a 189" display for $57,225.00 including installation. The display would have an effective resolution of 2688x1512, with 1.56mm between each LED. IYAGI Entertainment offers a five-year warranty on parts and labor.

Attachments
Proposal #1
Proposal #2
Proposal #3
Proposal #4
Proposal #5

Description Qty Rate Total
Two (2) Digital Displays

COLOR LED MESSAGE SIGN AND TRAINING

1. PROVIDE TWO (2) COLOR LED MESSAGE SIGN AT APPROX. 6'-3" H X 10'-6" W

OVERALL FOR

EXISTING D/F PYLON SIGN

2. PRICING INCLUDES:
- QTY ONE (1) PLAYER AND QTY TWO (2) DAYS OF ONSITE TRAINING FOR OPERATING THE SIGN.
- SHIPPING FEES
- HARDWARE FOR COLOR LED MESSAGE SIGNS
NOTES:

A. DUE TO FREQUENT VENDOR PRICE INCREASES, NSC CAN ONLY GUARANTEE PRICE FOR 30

DAYS FROM DATE OF PROPOSAL AND PROPOSALS NOT ACCEPTED WITHIN 30 DAYS ARE

SUBJECT TO PRICE INCREASE AND UPDATED PROPOSALS WITH NEW

PRICING FOR CLIENT
APPROVAL.

B. THIS PROPOSAL DOES NOT CONTAIN PRICING FOR: AFTER HOURS WORK,

SIGN/ELECTRICAL

PERMIT,
C. STREET USE/LANE CLOSURE PERMIT, TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN,

FLAGGERS/POLICE TRAFFIC

CONTROL, BARRICADE SIGNAGE, EQUIPMENT RENTAL OR PERMIT
ACQUISITION LABOR.

D. APPROX DELIVERY 6 TO 8 WEEKS CONTINGENT ON DEPOSIT RECEIVED AND PERMIT ISSUANCE.

2.00 67,953.85 135,907.70
Manufacture - New Faces
MFG two (2) 4’ x 11’-6’x1/8" Aluminum faces with light texture and 1” push thru letters 2.00 3,500.00 7,000.00 Electrical Material and Supplies
LED and power supplies to replace existing Fluorescent Lamps 2.00 400.00 800.00 Manufacture - New Retainers
MFG two (2) new sets of decorative retainers that goes around new Digital Displays 2.00 1,500.00 3,000.00 Digital Display Installation
Install two (2) new 6’-3”H x 10’-6”W Digital Displays and two (2) Single Face Sign Cabinets reading Civic Center
Scope of Work:

1. Temporarily remove upper portion of Pylon
Note: Staging area on site next to sign required.

2. Remove & Discard two (2) Sign Cabinets reading; Civic Center

3. Modify/Add Internal Steel Structure Framing to accommodate new larger Digital Displays

4. Install two (2) new SF LED illuminated cabinets with 1" push thru letters reading; Civic Center
Note: The new displays are taller than existing, thus requiring center lower signs to be replaced.

5. Install two (2) new digital displays.

6. Re-install upper portion of Pylon

7. Connect to existing electrical

8. Test Displays

9. Repaint Pylon Sign

1.00 42,560.00 42,560.00
Disposal Fee 1.00 500.00 500.00
Steel Structure Material and Electrical Material 1.00 2,400.00 2,400.00

Est_Opt2 7.29'x10.4R2
Description Qty Rate Total
Site Survey

1. Structural Survey for New digital displays

2. Determine if existing electrical circuits are sufficient for new digital displays

3. Determine size of new sign cabinets currently housing Civic Center signage Note: New Digital Displays are taller than existing, requiring existing sign cabinets to be replaced

1.00 400.00 400.00
Description Qty Rate Total
Two (2) Digital Displays

COLOR LED MESSAGE SIGN AND TRAINING

1. PROVIDE TWO (2) COLOR LED MESSAGE SIGN AT APPROX. 7'-3 1/2" H X 10'-5" W OVERALL FOR

EXISTING D/F PYLON SIGN

2. PRICING INCLUDES:
- QTY ONE (1) PLAYER AND QTY TWO (2) DAYS OF ONSITE TRAINING FOR OPERATING THE SIGN.
- SHIPPING FEES
- HARDWARE FOR COLOR LED MESSAGE SIGNS
NOTES:

A. DUE TO FREQUENT VENDOR PRICE INCREASES, NSC CAN ONLY GUARANTEE PRICE FOR 30

DAYS FROM DATE OF PROPOSAL AND PROPOSALS NOT ACCEPTED WITHIN 30 DAYS ARE

SUBJECT TO PRICE INCREASE AND UPDATED PROPOSALS WITH NEW

PRICING FOR CLIENT
APPROVAL.

B. THIS PROPOSAL DOES NOT CONTAIN PRICING FOR: AFTER HOURS WORK,

SIGN/ELECTRICAL

PERMIT,
C. STREET USE/LANE CLOSURE PERMIT, TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN,

FLAGGERS/POLICE TRAFFIC

CONTROL, BARRICADE SIGNAGE, EQUIPMENT RENTAL OR PERMIT
ACQUISITION LABOR.

D. APPROX DELIVERY 6 TO 8 WEEKS CONTINGENT ON DEPOSIT RECEIVED AND PERMIT ISSUANCE.

2.00 72,231.43 144,462.86
Manufacture - New Faces
MFG two (2) 3’ x 11’-6’ LED illuminated SF cabinets with the 1” push thru letters 2.00 3,500.00 7,000.00 Electrical Material and Supplies 1.00 400.00 400.00
Manufacture - New Retaiiners
MFG Two (2) sets of new decorative retainer that goes around new Digital Displays 2.00 1,500.00 3,000.00 Digital Display Installation
Install two (2) new 7'-3 1/2" H X 10'-5" W Digital Displays and two (2) Single Face Sign Cabinets reading Civic Center
Scope of Work:

1. Temporarily remove upper portion of Pylon
Note: Staging area on site next to sign required.

2. Remove & Discard two (2) Sign Cabinets reading; Civic Center

3. Modify/Add Internal Steel Structure Framing to accommodate new larger Digital Displays

4. Install two (2) new SF LED illuminated cabinets with 1" push thru letters reading; Civic Center
Note: The new displays are taller than existing, thus requiring center lower signs to be replaced.

5. Install two (2) new digital displays.

6. Re-install upper portion of Pylon

7. Connect to existing electrical

8. Test Displays

9. Repaint Pylon Sign

1.00 44,560.00 44,560.00
Disposal Fee 1.00 500.00 500.00
Steel Structure Material and Electrical Material 1.00 2,400.00 2,400.00

High Brightness
With a great brightness of 7000 nits, it clearly delivers content and attracts public attention, which is the ultimate display for outdoor visibility.

Conv enti ona l

visionpi
Aluminum Cabinet
Lightweight yet durable, it weighs only 20kg per square meter, facilitating a swift and effortless installation process. This design not only simplifies the setup but also reduces the structural load on installation surfaces, making it ideal for a wide range of applications. 06 0
7 Full-front and Rear maintenance
The Kingkong pro module features versatile front and rear maintenance access, suitable for any installation site. This design ensures easy and efficient servicing, accommodating various mounting setups and simplifying upkeep.

22.5kg
1 Pixel cobfiguratoin SMD2727 Nationstar
Pixel Pitch (mm) 6.25 1R1G1B Phisical
Pixel Desity 25600.00 dots/sqm
Cabinet Size mm (H*W) 1,000.0 1,000
Cabinet Resolution(H*W) 160 160
Modules Size (H*W) 250.00 500
Modules Resolution (H*W) 40.00 80
Corner Cabinet mm (H*W) 563 1000
Cabinet Weight 22.5 kg/pcs
Protection Grade IP67
Power Consumption 650w/m2 max | 100-200w/m2 ave.

Brightness (white balance
6500k)
7000 nits
Viewing Angle (H&V) 140/140 degree
Brightness Uniformity >99%
Pixel Center Deviation <1.5%
Power Supply 100 ~ 240VAC,3 Phase
Servie Front Service/Rear Service
Greyscale 16 bit supported 16384 levels for each RGB (Processing 22bit) Refresh Rate 3840hz+
Scan 1/8
Color Temperature Adjustable between 2000-9000k
Display Control Snchronous Controller
Operation Temperature -20C ~ +60C
Display Dimming Auto/manual 100 levels
Signal Transfer Ethernet / Optical-Fiber / WIFI etc.

Display Format Text, image, video (VGA, HDMI, DVI, Svideo etc.) Contrast ratio 10000:1
Life time 100,000 hours
Specification
Cable-free deign ensures simple and clean installtion. Perfect design produces a uniform installation across any setting with visionpi seamless splicing tehc,enhance the connection stability.

High refresh rate
Perfect image distribution and display to every visionipi high resolution LED seamless screen. Reduce the Moire effect for flicker free filming and broad-casting with 3840Hz refresh rate and most suitable IC driver models.
3D Design
An innovative LED display with a 90-degree bevel and smooth curve design, This innovative display is perfect for creating immersive, dynamic visual experiences that captivate and engage audiences.

Hot-swapping
2 6.25 Display(H) Display(W) Cabinet (H) Cabinet(W)
Orig. MM 2000 14000 1000 1000
Actual L/U Qty. 2 14 Module (H) Module(W)
Actual MM 2000.0 14000.0 250 500
Pixel 320 2240 Module (H) Module(W)
Receiver Card 2 14 8 28
Total Pixel (Resolution) 716800 Total (Sqm) 28
3 Dimenstion of LED Screen for Marquee

Unit Price Sub Total
(USD/SQM) (USD)
Design A
3D RGB Backlit Metal Letter Sign 2.00 $3,500.00 $7,000.00 7 Color Changeable $0.00
Design B
3D RGB Backlit Arcylic Letter Sign 2.00 $3,500.00 $7,000.00 7 Color Changeable
Installation
Sign Worker 24.00 35.00 $840.00
SuperVisor 24.00 40.00 $960.00
Genie Z34/22NElectricLift rental(2Week) 1.00 961.84 $961.84 Name Name: Joshua Yoon
Date: Date:

Signature Signature

3. Product delivery time: 30 working days.

4. Warranty Period: 5 years Part & Labor from delivery date

5. No Return, only repair under warranty
Authorized signature:

Buena Park City IYAGI Entertainment
Terms & Conditions:

1. Quotation valid time: 30 days from quotation date

2. Payment method: 35% Deposit to start to production, 35% after complete production and ready to ship, 30% Product delivery&After installation.

Non-Union
Non-Union
Genie Z34Lift
Total $9,761.84
3D RGBBackLitMetal
3D RGBBackLitMetal
Quotation
Item Descrption Qty/Set.

P2.34 SMD GOB 11'3"f(W)*12"(H)
IYAGI Enetertainment
Web：http://www.iyagientertainment.com Tel：714 464 9286 Contact：Joshua Yoon Email：[email protected]
Quotation for BP Sing for Marquee
LED Sign Size
Design A
Design B
Representative Hailey Schellin
Mobile 949.584.7028
Office 714.637.7557
Email [email protected]
Revision 7/15/2024
Item Quantity Manufacturer Model Description Unit Price Ext Price Display System
1 Samsung IAB 146 2K THE WALL ALL-IN-ONE IAB 146 2K MNTR $ 83,593.00 $ 83,593.00 Qty (1) 120v 15Amp New Power Circuit Needs to be inatalled at wall location Qty (1) Single Gang LV box with 1" conduit to accesible ceiling needs to be installed at Wall Location
Signal Distribution and Switching System
1 OFE - Crestron OFE- DM-RMC-4K-SCALER-C 4K DigitalMedia 8G+® Receiver & Room Controller w/Scaler - Existing Scaler that currently feeds the projector
Audio System
Existing Audio System will Remain
Control System
Existing Crestron Control System to be modified to control new video wall $ 83,593.00
$ 113.00
$ 447.00
$ -
$ 560.00
$ 1,754.00
$ 1,477.00
$ 2,093.00
$ 924.00
$ 7,847.00
$ 1,047.00
$ -
Sub-Contract $ -
$ 625.00
$ 15,767.00
Years Price
Extended Service Plan 0 $ -
$ -
Total Equipment $ 84,153.00
Total Labor $ 15,767.00
Equipment and Labor Subtotal $ 99,920.00
Total Shipping $ 2,345.00
Additional Shipping for Overnight or Large Items $ -
Subtotal $ 102,265.00
Sales Tax 7.75% $ 6,703.60
Electronic Waste Fee 4" - 14" ($4.00) QTY: 0 $ -
Electronic Waste Fee 15" - 34" ($5.00) QTY: 32 $ 160.00 Electronic Waste Fee 35" and Greater ($6.00) QTY: 0 $ - Electronic Waste Fee Total $ 160.00
Total Service Agreement $ -
Bond (if required) $ -
$ 109,128.60
Miscellaneous Materials Sub-Total
146 2K - Video Wall Equipment Sub-Total:

Cable & Connectors
Installation Hardware & Accessories
City of Buena Park
Board Chambers Upgrades
146 2K - Video Wall
Typical of 1 - Proposal Includes 1
Equipment Rack Hardware (Lacing Bars, Blanks, Vents, etc.) Miscellaneous Materials
Engineering & Drafting
Control Programming
Project Management
Staging & Assembly
Installation & Testing
Training, Closing, & Commissioning
Travel
G & A
Integration Labor Sub-Total
Extended Warranty & Maintenance Agreement
146 2K - Video Wall Totals
Integration Labor
Service Sub-Total
Flip-chip COB
Flip-chip COB is the process of die-bond the chip directly onto the PCB board, without wire bonding, a simplified process contributes to less defect creation factor. bringing to high black occupancy and reliability..

Conv enti ona l
Pristine black & color expression
COB supports each control room in constructing display walls exactly as envisioned. By combining an exceptionally dark base with our specialized Black Seal technology, it achieves deep black levels that enhance contrast and clarity in detail
visionpi
.
06 Over all protections
Seven Protections: COB LED display Module is sealed by epoxy resin and has no bare pad, which protects the LEDs from water, dust, oil stain, collision, oxidation and static. 1
LED Flip Chip COB
Pixel Pitch 0.78 mm 1R1G1B Phisical 0.93mm 1R1G1B Phisical 1.25mm 1R1G1B Phisical 1.56mm 1R1G1B Phisical Pixel Desity 1,638,400 dots/sqm 1137777 dots/sqm 640,000 dots/sqm 409,600 dots/sqm Cabinet Size mm (H*W) 600x337.5*32 mm
Cabinet Resolution(H*W) 768x432 640x360 480x270 384x216 Modules Size (H*W) 168.75x150mm
Driving Mode Constant Current Driving(Common Cathode)
Scan Mode 1/64S 1/54s 1/45S 1/45S
Cabinet Weight 4.5kg/Cabinet
Protection Grade IP65/IP43
Power Consumption 320w/m2 max | 100-128/m2 ave.@1200nits Brightness (white balance
6500k)
800-2000 nits
Viewing Angle (H&V) 170/170 degree
Brightness Uniformity >99%
Pixel Center Deviation <1.5%
Power Supply 100 ~ 240VAC,3 Phase
Servie Front Service
Greyscale 16 bit supported 16384 levels for each RGB (Processing 22bit) Refresh Rate 3840hz-7680hz
Color Temperature Adjustable between 2000-9000k
Display Control Snchronous Controller
Operation Temperature -20C ~ +60C
Display Dimming Auto/manual 100 levels
Signal Transfer Ethernet / Optical-Fiber / WIFI etc.

Display Format Text, image, video (VGA, HDMI, DVI, Svideo etc.) Contrast ratio 30000:1
Life time 100,000 hours
Specification
Fine-tune multi-step factory calibration process tunes video wall displays to the optimal uniform brightness and color across multiple displays to fit any broadcaster application or environment.

High refresh rate
Perfect image distribution and display to every visionipi high resolution LED seamless screen. Reduce the Moire effect for flicker free filming and broad-casting with 3840Hz-7680hz refresh rate and most suitable IC driver models.

High Brigtness
COB LED integrates inverted and common cathode technology with bigger size LED Chip, maintaining high brightness up to 2000nit, while reducing energy consumption. This ensures a clearer and brighter display effect, enhancing the viewing experience.

Pixel to pixel Calibration
2 Screen Size 4200x2362.5mm
3 LED screen concept for chamber room PLAN A_P1.56 COB
City of Buena Park
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report

DISCUSS AND PROVIDE DIRECTION REGARDING RECENT CHANGES TO STATE SPEED LIMIT SETTING LAWS Meeting
Tuesday, September 24, 2024, 5:00 PM
Agenda Group
STUDY SESSION Item: 9B
Presented By
Deepthi Arabolu, P.E., T.E., Assistant City Engineer
Prepared By
Mina Mikhael, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Approved By
Aaron France, City Manager

DISCUSSION
In 2017, the City Council adopted the current ordinance to establish posted speeds on city roadways. At that time, a citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) was conducted, as required by the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) and the California Vehicle Code (CVC).

Setting speed limits is the responsibility of state and local governments. Every state has a basic speed law that requires drivers to travel at a speed that is “reasonable and prudent” under the existing conditions. California has based its speed limits on a conventional process and practice known as the 85th percentile, based on an E&TS. A speed survey is conducted to measure drivers’ speeds and speed limits are set to reflect the speed at which 85% of drivers were driving. This was believed to be the safest speed. As per the CVC’s Speed Trap Section 40802, this E&TS needs to be updated every five years for the Police Department to be able to enforce speeding violations through radar. The renewal period can be extended to seven or ten years if the citing officer has completed at least 24 hours of certified radar operator training and if a registered engineer confirms that no significant changes in the roadway have occurred since the last review. Given that it has been seven years since the speed limits were established in the City, and with the introduction of the new law, staff has determined that it is time to re-certify the speed limits in the City.

This report outlines the latest state laws and guidance for setting speed limits and provides an overview on how these changes could affect the existing speed limits on the City’s streets.

In recent years, the traditional use of the 85th percentile methodology has faced significant criticism. The main argument against its use is that it prioritizes driver behavior without adequately considering other road users, such as pedestrians and bicyclists.

Assembly Member Laura Friedman of District 43 brought forward a bill to amend sections 627, 21400, 22352,22354, 22358, and 40802 of the CVC and to add sections 22358.6, 22358.7, 22358.8, and 22358.9 to the CVC  relating to traffic safety. This bill provides Caltrans and local authorities greater flexibility in setting and reducing speed limits based on recommendations from the Zero Traffic Fatality Task Force (Task Force) made in January 2020. The bill known as AB 43, was signed into law on October 8, 2021 and is enforceable as of June 30, 2024. AB 43 is a big step forward toward making roads safer throughout the state. It gives cities and regional agencies a powerful new tool in their ongoing efforts to reduce/eliminate bike and pedestrian fatalities.

The implications of the bill and the differences in setting speed limits compared to the previous law are outlined below:

Previous Law AB-43
Authorizes a prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH
in any business or residence district as per the
CVC definition.

New CVC 22358.9: Authorize a prima facie speed
limit of 20 MPH or 25 MPH on highways contiguous
to “Business Activity District” as defined by the CVC.

Criteria is provided in the CVC on what constitutes
a Business Activity District and under what
conditions the 20 or 25 MPH is implementable.

Violations are subject to warning citation, for the first 30 days of implementation.

Authorize speed limits to be reduced to 25
MPH based on an E&TS.

CVC 22358 Change: Authorize speed limits to be
reduced to as low as 20 MPH or 15 MPH based on
an E&TS.

Authorizes rounding up or down to the nearest
5 miles per hour increment of the 85th
percentile speed of free-flowing traffic on a
portion of highway as determined by an E&TS.

For example, if the 85th percentile speed of a
street is calculated at 38 MPH. The rounded
85th percentile speed would be 40 MPH.

Following an E&TS the posted speed limit
should be set no lower than 35 MPH
New CVC 22358.7: Authorizes a further 5 MPH
increment reductions below past calculated speed
zones taking into consideration vulnerable
pedestrian groups or “Safety Corridors” as a
heavily-weighted factor. Violations are subject to
warning citation, for the first 30 days of
implementation.

For the example stated here, the speed limit could
be set at 30 MPH provided the roadway segment is
designated as a “safety corridor” or an area with
high concentration of pedestrians and bicyclists.

New CVC 22358.8: Authorizes to keep previous
speed limits valid if new speed surveys show higher
85 th percentile speeds.

Validate a speed survey for up to 10 years, 7-
year normal life plus a one-time, 3-year
extension on an evaluation from a registered
engineer.

CVC 40802 Change: Validate a speed survey for up
to 14 years, 7-year normal life plus a one-time, 7-
year extension based on an evaluation from a
registered engineer.

The CVC has been modified to change the
definition and criteria for a “Speed Trap.” New
definitions are added for “senior zone” and
“business activity district” and they are exempt from
provisions of a “Speed Trap.”
Assembly Bill 1938 is an extension of AB 43 and sets a speed reduction limit of up to 12.4 MPH based on the 85th percentile speed survey. The prior law only allows for one 5 MPH reduction after rounding the 85th percentile speed to the nearest 5 MPH increment.

Staff will issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) to select a consultant for conducting the E&TS and set new speed limits in compliance with the latest regulations. This report will:

Brainstorm corridors that would make good candidates for potential Safety Corridors within the City of Buena Park to establish new speed zone segment recommendations based on the allowances of AB 43.

Identify any speed limits that were raised between 2009 and 2018 due to changes in the law rather than roadway conditions. According to AB 43, we will have the authority to restore the speed limits on all such roadways.

Identify any corridors that would qualify as “Business Activity District” characterized by no more than four lanes, areas of business activity generating pedestrians/bicycle traffic, on-street parking, and frequent traffic controls or uncontrolled crosswalks. In such situations, the law allows to establish speed limits as low as 20 mph without he need of an E&TS.

Upon completion of the E&TS, staff will present the report and ordinance to the City Council for approval.

Attachments
Attachment 1 Assembly Bill No. 43 Chapter 690 Traffic Safety.pdf Attachment 2 New CVC modified by AB-43.pdf
Changes made to California Vehicle Code
red highlight: deleted, green highlight: added)
Old 627.
a) “ Engineering and traffic survey,” as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities.
b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. 2) Accident records.
3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs ( 1) to ( 3), inclusive, of subdivision ( b) may consider all of the following:
1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:

A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

C) The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph ( A) or (B).
2) Pedestrian and bicyclist safety.

Amended by Stats. 2000, Ch. 45, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 2001.) 2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 13 of 28
New 627.
a) “ Engineering and traffic survey,” as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities.
b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. 2) Accident records.
3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs ( 1) to ( 3), inclusive, of subdivision ( b) may consider all of the following:
1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:

A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

C) The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph ( A) or (B).
2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 14 of 28
Old 21400.
a) ( 1) The Department of Transportation shall, after consultation with local agencies and public hearings, adopt rules and regulations prescribing uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic control devices placed pursuant to this code, including, but not limited to, stop signs, yield right-of-way signs, speed restriction signs, railroad warning approach signs, street name signs, lines and markings on the roadway, and stock crossing signs placed pursuant to Section 21364. 2) The Department of Transportation shall, after notice and public hearing, determine and publicize the specifications for uniform types of warning signs, lights, and devices to be placed upon a highway by a person engaged in performing work that interferes with or endangers the safe movement of traffic upon that highway. 3) Only those signs, lights, and devices as are provided for in this section shall be placed upon a highway to warn traffic of work that is being performed on the highway. 4) Control devices or markings installed upon traffic barriers on or after January 1, 1984, shall conform to the uniform standards and specifications required by this section.
b) The Department of Transportation shall revise the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as it read on January 1, 2012, to require the Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic. However, in cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment, but then the Department of Transportation or a local authority shall not reduce the speed limit any further for any reason.
2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 15 of 28
New 21400.
a) The Department of Transportation shall, after consultation with local agencies and public hearings, adopt rules and regulations prescribing uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic control devices placed pursuant to this code, including, but not limited to, stop signs, yield right-of-way signs, speed restriction signs, railroad warning approach signs, street name signs, lines and markings on the roadway, and stock crossing signs placed pursuant to Section 21364. b) The Department of Transportation shall, after notice and public hearing, determine and publicize the specifications for uniform types of warning signs, lights, and devices to be placed upon a highway by a person engaged in performing work that interferes with or endangers the safe movement of traffic upon that highway. c) Only those signs, lights, and devices as are provided for in this section shall be placed upon a highway to warn traffic of work that is being performed on the highway. d) Control devices or markings installed upon traffic barriers on or after January 1, 1984, shall conform to the uniform standards and specifications required by this section.
2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 16 of 28
Old 22352.

The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
a) Fifteen miles per hour:
1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along the railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
2) When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver’ s approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.
3) On any alley.
b) Twenty- five miles per hour:
1) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code.
2) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard “ SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard “ SCHOOL” warning sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard SCHOOL” warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
3) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard SENIOR” warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may request grant funding from the Active Transportation Program pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 2380) of Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources.

Amended by Stats. 2015, Ch. 12, Sec. 15. (AB 95) Effective June 24, 2015.) 2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 17 of 28
New 22352.

The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
a) Fifteen miles per hour:
1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along the railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagperson is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
2) When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver’ s approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.
3) On any alley.
b) Twenty- five miles per hour:
1) On any highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority or the Department of Transportation under procedures set forth in this code.
2) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard “ SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard “ SCHOOL” warning sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard SCHOOL” warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
3) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard SENIOR” warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may request grant funding from the Active Transportation Program pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 2380) of Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources.
2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 18 of 28
Old 22354.
a) Whenever the Department of Transportation determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of a state highway where the limit of 65 miles is applicable, the department may determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30 or 25 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the highway.
b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision ( c) of Section 22366.

Repealed ( in Sec. 24) and added by Stats. 1995, Ch. 766, Sec. 25. Effective January 1, 1996. This section became operative, by its own provisions, on the date described in Section 22366.)
New 22354.
a) Whenever the Department of Transportation determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of a state highway where the limit of 65 miles is applicable, the department may determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25 , 20, or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the highway.
b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision ( c) of Section 22366.
2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 19 of 28
Old 22358.
a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, or 25 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision ( c) of Section 22366.

Repealed ( in Sec. 30) and added by Stats. 1995, Ch. 766, Sec. 31. Effective January 1, 1996. This section became operative, by its own provisions, on the date described in Section 22366.)
New 22358.
a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision ( c) of Section 22366.
2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 20 of 28
Old 22358.6
Does not exist
New 22358.6.

The Department of Transportation shall, in the next scheduled revision, revise and thereafter maintain the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices to require the Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic.

However, in cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment. A local authority may additionally lower the speed limit as provided in Sections 22358.7 and 22358.8. 2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 21 of 28
Old 22358.7
Does not exist
New 22358.7.
a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour for either of the following reasons:
1) The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. A local authority shall not deem more than one- fifth of their streets as safety corridors. 2) The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused. b) ( 1) As used in this section, “ safety corridor” shall be defined by the Department of Transportation in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. In making this determination, the department shall consider highways that have the highest number of serious injuries and fatalities based on collision data that may be derived from, but not limited to, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System.
2) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, determine what constitutes land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians, as used in paragraph ( 2) of subdivision ( a). In making this determination, the department shall consider density, road use type, and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure present on a section of highway.
c) A local authority may not lower a speed limit as authorized by this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide as specified in Article 7 (commencing with Section 68645) of Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Government Code, whichever is sooner. d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.
2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 22 of 28
Old 22358.8
Does not exist
New 22358.8.
a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit. b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five miles per hour from the current speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit.
c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.
2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 23 of 28
Old 22358.9
Does not exist
New 22358.9.
a) ( 1) Notwithstanding any other law, a local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour.
2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph ( 1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:

A) A maximum of four traffic lanes.

B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 miles per hour speed limit.

C) A maximum posted 25 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 miles per hour speed limit.
b) As used in this section, a “ business activity district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs ( 1) to (4), inclusive:
1) No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
2) Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway.
3) Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.
4) Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. c) A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit under this section on a portion of a highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted under Sections 22358.7 and 22358.8.
d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.
2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 24 of 28
Old 40802.
a) A “ speed trap” is either of the following:
1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.
2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph ( 1) of subdivision ( b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.
b) ( 1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. When a street or road does not appear on the “ California Road System Maps,” it may be defined as a “ local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:

A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.

B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445.

C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
2) For purposes of this section, “ school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “ SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period.

School zone” also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign.
c) ( 1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph ( 2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision ( a) shall not be applicable:

A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.

B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph ( A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. 2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 25 of 28
C) ( i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs A) and ( B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph ( B) of paragraph ( 2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph ( D).
ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406.

D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
2) A “ speed trap” is either of the following:

A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.

B) ( i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph ( 1) of subdivision ( b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:

I) Except as specified in subclause ( II), seven years.

II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 10 years. ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.

Amended by Stats. 2017, Ch. 397, Sec. 9. (SB 810) Effective January 1, 2018.) 2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 26 of 28
New 40802.
a) A “ speed trap” is either of the following:
1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.
2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph ( 1) of subdivision ( b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, school zone, senior zone, or business activity district.
b) ( 1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a “ local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:

A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.

B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445.

C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
2) For purposes of this section, “ school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “ SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period.

School zone” also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign.
3) For purposes of this section, “ senior zone” means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352.
4) For purposes of this section, “ business activity district” means a section of highway described in subdivision ( b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour or 20 miles per hour speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to paragraph 1) of subdivision ( a) of that section.
c) ( 1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph ( 2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision ( a) shall not be applicable:
2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 27 of 28
A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.

B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph ( A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.

C) ( i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs A) and ( B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph ( B) of paragraph ( 2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph ( D).
ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406.

D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
2) A “ speed trap” is either of the following:

A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.

B) ( i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph ( 1) of subdivision ( b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:

I) Except as specified in subclause ( II), seven years.

II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years. ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone, senior zone, or business activity district.
2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 28 of 28
SHARE THIS: Date Published: 10/ 11/ 2021 02:00 PM
AB-43 Traffic safety.( 2021- 2022)
Assembly Bill No. 43
CHAPTER 690
An act to amend Sections 627, 21400, 22352, 22354, 22358, and 40802 of, and to add Sections 22358.6, 22358.7, 22358.8, and 22358.9 to, the Vehicle Code, relating to traffic safety.

Approved by Governor October 08, 2021. Filed with Secretary of State October 08, 2021. ]

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 43, Friedman. Traffic safety.
1) Existing law establishes various default speed limits for vehicles upon highways, as specified. Existing law authorizes state and local authorities to adjust these default speed limits, as specified, based upon certain findings determined by an engineering and traffic survey. Existing law defines an engineering and traffic survey and prescribes specified factors that must be included in the survey, including prevailing speeds and road conditions. Existing law authorizes local authorities to consider additional factors, including pedestrian and bicyclist safety.

This bill would authorize local authorities to consider the safety of vulnerable pedestrian groups, as specified. 2) Existing law establishes a prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour on any highway, other than a state highway, located in any business or residence district, as defined. Existing law authorizes a local authority to change the speed limit on any such highway, as prescribed, including erecting signs to give notice thereof.

This bill would establish a prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour on state highways located in any business or residence district and would authorize the Department of Transportation ( Caltrans) to change the speed limit on any such highway, as prescribed, including erecting signs to give notice thereof. 3) Existing law establishes a speed limit of 65 miles per hour on state highways, as specified. Existing law authorizes Caltrans to declare a speed limit on any such highway, as prescribed, of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, or 25 miles per hour, including erecting signs to give notice thereof. Existing law also authorizes a local authority, on a section of highway, other than a state highway, where the speed limit is 65 miles per hour to declare a lower speed limit, as specified.

This bill would additionally authorize Caltrans and a local authority to declare a speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, as specified, on these highways.
4) Existing law authorizes a local authority, without an engineering and traffic survey, to declare a lowered speed limit on portions of highway, as specified, approaching a school building or school grounds. Existing law Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites 2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 6 of 28
limits this authority to sections of highway meeting specified requirements relating to the number of lanes and the speed limit of the highway before the school zone.

This bill would similarly authorize a lowered speed limit on a section of highway contiguous to a business activity district, as defined, and would require that certain violations be subject to a warning citation, for the first 30 days of implementation.
5) Existing law requires Caltrans, by regulation, to provide for the rounding up or down to the nearest 5 miles per hour increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic on a portion of highway as determined by a traffic and engineering survey. Existing law requires the Judicial Council to create and implement an online tool by June 30, 2024, for the adjudication of traffic infractions, among other things.

This bill would authorize a local authority to further reduce the speed limit, as specified, and require that certain violations be subject to a warning citation, for the first 30 days of implementation. The bill would, in some circumstances, authorize the reduction of a speed limit beginning June 30, 2024, or when the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating traffic infraction violations, whichever is sooner. The bill would require Caltrans to accordingly revise the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as specified. 6) Existing law defines a speed trap and prohibits evidence of a driver’ s speed obtained through a speed trap from being admissible in court in any prosecution against a driver for a speed- related offense. Existing law deems a road where the speed limit is not justified by a traffic and engineering survey conducted within the previous 7 years to be a speed trap, unless the roadway has been evaluated by a registered engineer, as specified, in which case the speed limit remains enforceable for a period of 10 years. Existing law exempts a school zone, as defined, from certain provisions relating to defining a speed trap.

This bill would extend the period that a speed limit justified by a traffic and engineering survey conducted more the 7 years ago remains valid, for purposes of speed enforcement, if evaluated by a registered engineer, as specified, to 14 years.

This bill would also exempt a senior zone and business activity district, as defined, from those provisions.

Vote: majority Appropriation: no Fiscal Committee: yes Local Program: no THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Section 627 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:
627. ( a) “ Engineering and traffic survey,” as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities.
b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. 2) Accident records.
3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs ( 1) to ( 3), inclusive, of subdivision ( b) may consider all of the following:
1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:

A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

C) The portion of highway is longer than one- quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph ( A) or (B). 2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 7 of 28
2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.

SEC. 2. Section 21400 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:
21400. ( a) The Department of Transportation shall, after consultation with local agencies and public hearings, adopt rules and regulations prescribing uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic control devices placed pursuant to this code, including, but not limited to, stop signs, yield right-of-way signs, speed restriction signs, railroad warning approach signs, street name signs, lines and markings on the roadway, and stock crossing signs placed pursuant to Section 21364.
b) The Department of Transportation shall, after notice and public hearing, determine and publicize the specifications for uniform types of warning signs, lights, and devices to be placed upon a highway by a person engaged in performing work that interferes with or endangers the safe movement of traffic upon that highway. c) Only those signs, lights, and devices as are provided for in this section shall be placed upon a highway to warn traffic of work that is being performed on the highway. d) Control devices or markings installed upon traffic barriers on or after January 1, 1984, shall conform to the uniform standards and specifications required by this section.

SEC. 3. Section 22352 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:
22352. The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
a) Fifteen miles per hour:
1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along the railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagperson is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car. 2) When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver’s approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals. 3) On any alley.
b) Twenty- five miles per hour:
1) On any highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority or the Department of Transportation under procedures set forth in this code. 2) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard “ SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard “ SCHOOL” warning sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard “ SCHOOL” warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
3) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard “ SENIOR” warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may request grant funding from the Active Transportation Program pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 2380) of Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources.

SEC. 4. Section 22354 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:
2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 8 of 28
22354. ( a) Whenever the Department of Transportation determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of a state highway where the limit of 65 miles is applicable, the department may determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the highway. b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision ( c) of Section 22366.

SEC. 5. Section 22358 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:
22358. ( a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision ( c) of Section 22366.

SEC. 6. Section 22358. 6 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:
22358. 6. The Department of Transportation shall, in the next scheduled revision, revise and thereafter maintain the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices to require the Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free- flowing traffic.

However, in cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment. A local authority may additionally lower the speed limit as provided in Sections 22358. 7 and 22358. 8.

SEC. 7. Section 22358. 7 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:
22358. 7. ( a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour for either of the following reasons:
1) The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. A local authority shall not deem more than one-fifth of their streets as safety corridors.
2) The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.
b) ( 1) As used in this section, “ safety corridor” shall be defined by the Department of Transportation in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. In making this determination, the department shall consider highways that have the highest number of serious injuries and fatalities based on collision data that may be derived from, but not limited to, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System. 2) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, determine what constitutes land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians, as used in paragraph ( 2) of subdivision ( a). In making this determination, the department shall consider density, road use type, and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure present on a section of highway.
c) A local authority may not lower a speed limit as authorized by this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide as specified in Article 7 (commencing with Section 68645) of Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Government Code, whichever is sooner. d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

SEC. 8. Section 22358. 8 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:
2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 9 of 28
22358. 8. ( a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.
b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five miles per hour from the current speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

SEC. 9. Section 22358. 9 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:
22358. 9. ( a) ( 1) Notwithstanding any other law, a local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour. 2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph ( 1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:

A) A maximum of four traffic lanes.

B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 miles per hour speed limit.

C) A maximum posted 25 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 miles per hour speed limit. b) As used in this section, a “ business activity district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs ( 1) to (4), inclusive:
1) No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway. 2) Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway. 3) Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.
4) Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. c) A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit under this section on a portion of a highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted under Sections 22358. 7 and 22358. 8. d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

SEC. 10. Section 40802 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:
40802. ( a) A “ speed trap” is either of the following:
1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.
2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph ( 1) of subdivision ( b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358. 3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, school zone, senior zone, or business activity district. 2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 10 of 28
b) ( 1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “ local” on the California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a “ local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:

A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.

B) Not more than one- half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445.

C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
2) For purposes of this section, “ school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “ SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period.

School zone” also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard “ SCHOOL” warning sign.
3) For purposes of this section, “ senior zone” means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “ SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352. 4) For purposes of this section, “ business activity district” means a section of highway described in subdivision b) of Section 22358. 9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour or 20 miles per hour speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to paragraph ( 1) of subdivision ( a) of that section. c) ( 1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph ( 2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision ( a) shall not be applicable:

A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.

B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph ( A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.

C) ( i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs ( A) and ( B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph ( B) of paragraph 2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph D).
ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406.

D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
2) A “ speed trap” is either of the following:

A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.

B) ( i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph ( 1) of subdivision ( b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358. 3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the 2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 11 of 28
alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:

I) Except as specified in subclause ( II), seven years.

II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years. ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone, senior zone, or business activity district.
2023-10-18 Item #10B Page 12 of 28
City of Buena Park
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report

UPDATE ON THE CITY'S IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMUNITY WORKFORCE AGREEMENT Meeting
Tuesday, September 24, 2024, 5:00 PM
Agenda Group
STUDY SESSION Item: 9C
Presented By
Mina Mikhael, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Prepared By
Mina Mikhael, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Approved By
Aaron France, City Manager

DISCUSSION
On March 8, 2022, the City Council approved a Community Workforce Agreement (CWA) between the City of Buena Park ("City") and the Los Angeles and Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council and the Signatory Craft Council and Unions ('Unions') with a five-year term effective July 1, 2022. On July 1, 2022, the Public Works Department retained The Solis Group as  CWA Administrator. Since this time, the Solis Group has enforced the requirements of the CWA; facilitated communication between the City, its contractors, the Unions; and ensured the satisfaction of all parties in regards to the CWA during the construction phase of each project.

On October 30, 2023, City staff met with representatives Ernesto Medrano and Andrew Gonzales from the Unions to discuss challenges in administering the Community Workforce Agreement (CWA). The City has faced challenges in receiving sufficient bids for certain projects, particularly those requiring specialized work such as pool and park improvements, due to contractors' unwillingness to comply with the CWA. The City also faced difficulties in procuring professional services for geotechnical engineering and surveying required for project monitoring and staking. These issues were presented to the CWA building trades team. With Mr. Medrano moving to another role, Mr. Gonzales will assist the City in attracting contractors for these projects. Both parties are open to exploring alternative solutions, if these challenges persist over the next six months.

On November 14, 2023, Jeremy Turner, VP of Field Operations at The Solis Group, provided an update on the first year of the  CWA  implementation. The update covered local hiring ratios, project budgets, schedules, and the successes and challenges faced. First-year CWA projects included sewer main lining, sewer upsizing, annual pavement rehabilitation, Orangethorpe Avenue Rehabilitation, Whitaker School Park, SCE Trail Phase 2, ADA improvements at various parks, and Peak/Boisseranc Park pool improvements. At that meeting, the update included an overview of the local hire goals. The CWA requires that 30% of all hours are locally met through a threetier system. Tier 1 extends to city zip codes, veterans, and MC3 Graduates. Tier 2 is a 10-mile radius of the city, and Tier 3 is the balance of Orange County. During the first year of CWA, the local hire numbers were as follows: Tier 1:

3.34%, Tier 2: 28.83%, Tier 3: 15.06%.

On February 20, 2024, City staff met with The Solis Group and a CWA representative to discuss progress in administering the CWA. The meeting outlined active projects and their progress and some upcoming projects to make the trades aware of. The challenge of not receiving sufficient bids on specialty projects was discussed and the trades requested a copy of all projects going out to bid for their use in circulating to CWA contractors and urging them to bid on the projects. The City has copied the trades on all CWA projects posted for bid. While seeing no significant challenges on most projects, specialty projects continue to present challenges in attracting qualified bidders. During this meeting, staff also discussed continued challenges in finding surveying and geotechnical consultants that are willing to abide by the CWA agreements. Most of the City’s on-call surveying list has opted out of performing construction support on CWA projects. One of the consultant’s responses summarized the consensus among the others by stating, “For professional land surveying, a highly-skilled, two-person crew is called upon just occasionally and on an as-needed basis to provide staking. I’m concerned that I can’t provide our level of service, quality, and timeliness if I have to find temporary occasional employees that have not been trained by my own workforce to provide staking, which is a very high-risk task in that the slightest problem with timing or staking can have serious repercussions in the construction.”
On September 4, 2024, City staff met with The Solis Group and a  CWA representative to discuss progress in administering the CWA. Similar to the previous meeting, the agenda outlined active and proposed projects. City staff presented continued challenges in finding surveying and geotechnical consultants for construction support.

Andrew Gonzales, representing the trades, provided some consultants that are familiar with CWA work for the City’s use, along with the current on-call list. The City discussed the challenges faced on specialty projects, in particular the Peak Park Water Well Drilling project. The project went out to bid on July 30, 2024, and held a mandatory prebid job walk on August 8, 2024, with nine contractors in attendance. As part of the job walk, the CWA requirements were discussed, and the contractors voiced their concerns with utilizing outside workforce for this type of work.

Several of the contractors present provided written documentation withdrawing from the bid and stating their reasons. The consensus among the qualified contractors was summed up by one company in stating, “Our work is highly specialized and sensitive in nature, requiring skilled workers with specific expertise in water well drilling. The local labor pool may lack the necessary experience and qualifications, leading to potential issues with project quality and safety.” Following this meeting, City staff requested the trades to provide municipal water well drilling companies that meet the qualifications and are amenable to CWA work. Four companies were received and are currently evaluating the requirements.

While the CWA has performed as expected on transportation and utility projects, specialty projects and professional services, such as surveying and geotechnical administration, remain a challenge. The City appreciates Mr. Gonzales’ efforts and responsiveness and will continue to work through these challenges.

Additionally, the CWA has met the following hiring goals in the second year of its adoption: Tier 1: 1.65%, Tier 2:

23.86%, and Tier 3: 6.53% for a total local hire of 32.03% on CWA projects.

Attachments
CWA Presentation 2024.pdf
City of Buena Park
Community Workforce Agreement Update
Community Workforce Agreement (CWA) Facts
 Effective Dates: January 1, 2022 – January 1, 2027
 Signed with Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building &
Construction Trades Council
 Covered Projects:
 All Construction, Abatement, Demolition, Renovation,
Rehabilitation, Upgrade and Improvement Work
 Multi-Trade Contracts that exceed $500,000
 Prime Specialty Contracts that exceed $250,000
 Projects Awarded under agreement:

Community Workforce Agreement (CWA) Facts
Project
Award
Date
Engineer's
Estimate Award Amount % Change
Caballero Blvd. Pavement Rehab Project 4/9/2024 $860,000.00 $659,000.00 -23.37% 23-24 Annual Paving Rehab 5/14/2024 $1,300,000.00 $1,363,330.00 +4.87% Magnolia Ave Water Main Interconnect 5/28/2024 $510,000.00 $627,164.00 +22.97% Smith Murphy & Carl Brenner Park
Accessibility Improvements 6/11/2024 $780,000.00 $778,611.66 -.17% 23-24 & 24-25 Sewer Main Lining at Various
Locations 7/9/2024 $961,000.00 $1,035,308.75 +7.18%
Los Coyotes Drive Street Improvements 8/23/2024 $850,000.00 $650,000.00 -23.52%  30% of all hours
 Local Area – 3 Tiers
 Tier 1 – City Zip Codes +
• Veterans
• MC3 Graduates
 Tier 2 – 10 Mile Radius
 Tier 3 – Orange County
CWA – Local Hire Goal
CWA – Local Hire Goal
Category Hours %
Tier 1 453.17 1.65%
Tier 2 6,567.15 23.86%
Tier 3 1,796.72 6.53%
All Local 8,817.04 32.03%
 Difficulties getting bidders
 Fewer bids submitted on CWA projects
 Higher bids from remaining bidders
 Specialty Work
 Solutions
 JAC Meetings
 Advertise new projects through Building Trades
 Identify specific contractors for specialized work
CWA – Challenges
City of Buena Park
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Report

DISCUSS AND PROVIDE DIRECTION TO THE CITY COUNCIL-APPOINTED VOTING DELEGATES FOR THE CAL

CITIES CONFERENCE GENERAL ASSEMBLY MEETING
Meeting
Tuesday, September 24, 2024, 5:00 PM
Agenda Group
STUDY SESSION Item: 9D
Presented By
Adria Jimenez, MMC, Director of Government and Community Relations/City Clerk
Prepared By
Adria Jimenez, City Clerk
Approved By
Aaron France, City Manager

DISCUSSION
The Cal Cities General Assembly will take place during the League of California Cities Annual Conference, scheduled for October 16-18, 2024, in Long Beach. At this event, city officials from across California will convene to vote on resolutions that shape the organization’s policy priorities. The resolutions, developed and reviewed by the General Resolutions Committee, cover a range of local governance issues and seek to guide advocacy efforts.

Delegates from each city vote on these resolutions, which influence Cal Cities' legislative focus for the upcoming year.

This year, there is one resolution for consideration submitted by the City of Glendora, titled "Fair and Equal Treatment of All Governmental Officials at All Levels" (Attachment1). The City of Glendora, with the support of other local cities and officials, is calling for the California Legislature to adopt laws ensuring that all governmental officials, at both state and local levels, are treated equally under the law. The resolution expresses concerns about current practices where rules and regulations—such as the Ralph M. Brown Act (open meeting laws), certain exemptions from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and campaign finance restrictions—are applied only to local city officials and not to state officials. The resolution urges the Governor and Legislature to implement a policy ensuring that laws applying to one level of government also apply to all.

It would be appropriate for the City Council to discuss the proposed resolution and provide direction to the City's voting delegates, Council Member Traut and Council Member Brown (alternate delegate).

Attachments
2024 Cal Cities Resolutions Packet.pdf
2023-2024

CAL CITIES OFFICERS
President
Daniel T. Parra
Mayor
Fowler
First Vice President
Lynne Kennedy
Mayor Pro Tem,
Rancho Cucamonga
Second Vice President
Gabe Quinto
Council Member,
El Cerrito
Immediate Past President
Ali Sajjad Taj
Mayor Pro Tem,
Artesia
Executive Director
and CEO
Carolyn M. Coleman
1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org August 28, 2024
TO: Mayors, Council Members, City Managers, and City Clerks RE: Cal Cities 2024 Resolution Packet
Sixty days before the Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo, Cal Cities members may submit resolutions on issues of importance to cities. This year, Cal Cities received one resolution by the Aug. 17 deadline.

The attached packet contains the proposed resolution, supporting letters from city officials, and an analysis of the resolution by Cal Cities. The packet includes detailed information on the resolution process.

We encourage each city council to consider the resolution and determine a city position so your voting delegate can represent your city’s position on the resolution.

Voting Delegates: City councils must appoint a voting delegate to vote during the General Assembly. Each city may also appoint up to two alternate delegates. If your city has not already done so, please appoint your voting delegate by Sept. 25. The voting delegate packet contains more information.

The Cal Cities 2024 General Assembly will be held Oct. 18 at 8:30 a.m. in the Long Beach Convention Center during the Annual Conference and Expo.

For questions about resolutions, voting delegates, or the General Assembly, please contact Zach Seals.
2024
Resolutions
Packet
2024 Resolutions Packet
Information on 2024 Resolutions Process
Consideration by Policy Committee (pre-conference)
Per the Cal Cities bylaws, the Cal Cities President has referred the submitted resolution to the Governance, Transparency, and Labor Relations Policy Committee. The committee will meet on Oct. 3 at 10 a.m. via Zoom to review the resolution and make a recommendation that will be sent to the Resolutions Committee. A public comment period will be held during the meeting. Register for the meeting here.

A list of recommendations the policy committee may make during its meeting are on page three of this packet.

Consideration by Resolutions Committee (during conference) On Oct. 17 at 1:30 p.m. the Resolutions Committee will meet to review the resolution and the recommendation of the policy committee.

The Resolutions Committee consists of one representative from each of Cal Cities caucuses, departments, divisions, and policy committees, as well as up to ten additional appointments made by the Cal Cities President. A public comment period will be held during the meeting. Refer to the onsite conference program for the location.

A list of recommendations the Resolutions Committee may make during its meeting are on page three of this packet.

Consideration by the General Assembly (during conference) The General Assembly will convene on Oct. 18 at 8:30 a.m. to consider any qualified resolutions. To vote during the General Assembly, voting delegates must have checked-in at the voting delegate booth.

Conference attendees will receive materials for the General Assembly on the evening of Oct. 17. For more information on voting and discussion procedures during the General Assembly, see page four of this packet.

Petitioned Resolutions (during conference)
The petitioned resolution is an alternate method to introduce policy proposals during the annual conference. To initiate a petitioned resolution, voting delegates from 10% of member cities must sign the petition. The resolution and signatures are due at least 24 hours before the beginning of the General Assembly. Voting delegates who have checked-in at the voting delegate booth can receive more information on petitioned resolutions at the booth onsite. 1 Sixty days before the
Annual Conference
and Expo, Cal Cities
members may submit
policy proposals on
issues of importance
to cities. The resolution must
have the concurrence of at least
five additional member cities or
individual members.

How it works: Cal Cities
Resolutions and the General Assembly
General Assembly
General Resolutions Policy Committees
Developing League of California Cities policy is a dynamic process that engages a wide range of members to ensure Cal Cities represents cities with one voice. These policies directly guide Cal Cities’ advocacy to promote local decision-making, and lobby against statewide policies that erode local control.

The resolutions process and General Assembly is one way that city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy. If a resolution is approved at the General Assembly, it becomes official Cal Cities policy. Here’s how resolutions and the General Assembly work.

The petitioned
resolution is an
alternate method
to introduce policy
proposals during
the annual conference. The
petition must be signed by
voting delegates from 10% of
member cities, and submitted to
the Cal Cities President at least
24 hours before the beginning
of the General Assembly.

Petitioned Resolutions
The Cal Cities
President assigns
general resolutions
to policy committees
where members
review, debate, and recommend
positions for each policy proposal.

Recommendations are forwarded
to the Resolutions Committee.

Who’s who
The Resolutions Committee
includes representatives
from each Cal Cities
diversity caucus, regional
division, municipal
department, and policy
committee, as well as
individuals appointed by
the Cal Cities president.

Voting delegates
are appointed by each
member city; every city
has one voting delegate.

The General Assembly is a
meeting of the collective
body of all voting
delegates —one from
every member city.

Seven policy committees
meet throughout the year
to review and recommend
positions to take on bills
and regulatory proposals.

Policy committees include
members from each Cal
Cities diversity caucus,
regional division, and
municipal department,
as well as individuals
appointed by the Cal
Cities president.

During the General Assembly, voting delegates
debate and consider general and petitioned
resolutions forwarded by the Resolutions
Committee. Potential Cal Cities bylaws
amendments are also considered at this meeting.

Cal Cities policy
development is a memberinformed process,
grounded in the voices and
experiences of city officials
throughout the state.

For more information visit www.calcities.org/general-assembly Prior to the Annual Conference and Expo
Resolutions Committee
The Resolutions
Committee considers
all resolutions. General
Resolutions approved1 by
either a policy committee
or the Resolutions Committee are next
considered by the General Assembly.

General resolutions not approved, or
referred for further study by both a
policy committee and the Resolutions
Committee do not go to the General
Assembly. All Petitioned Resolutions
are considered by the General
Assembly, unless disqualified.2
During the Annual Conference and Expo
1 The Resolution Committee can amend a general resolution prior to sending it to the General Assembly. 2 Petitioned Resolutions may be disqualified by the Resolutions Committee according to Cal Cities Bylaws Article VI. Sec. 5(f). 2 2024 Resolutions Packet
Policy Committee and Resolutions Committee Actions
The submitted resolution will be heard by the policy committee to which it was assigned, and the Resolutions Committee. The below table shows what recommendations these bodies may make on the resolution.

Policy Committee Actions Resolutions Committee Actions
Approve Approve
Disapprove* Disapprove*
No Action No Action
Amend and approve Amend and approve
Refer to appropriate policy committee
for further study*
Approve as amended
Refer as amended to appropriate
policy committee for further study*
Refer to appropriate policy committee
for further study*
Refer as amended to appropriate
policy committee for further study*
Approve with additional
amendment(s)
Additional amendments and refer to
appropriate policy committee for
further study*
*If a resolution is disapproved or referred for further study by all policy committees to which it is assigned and the Resolutions Committee, it will not proceed to the General Assembly. 3 2024 Resolutions Packet
General Assembly Voting and Discussion Procedures
Discussion Procedures:

Discussion procedures during the General Assembly are guided by two calendars:
the Consent Calendar and the Regular Calendar. As seen below, resolutions are calendared by the recommendations they receive from policy committees and the Resolutions Committee.

For General Resolutions:

Policy Committee
Recommendation
Resolutions Committee
Recommendation Calendar
Approve Approve Consent Calendar
Approve Disapprove or refer Regular Calendar
Disapprove or refer Approve Regular Calendar
Disapprove or refer Disapprove or refer Does not proceed to General Assembly
For Petitioned Resolutions:

Policy Committee
Recommendation Resolutions Committee Action Calendar
N/A
Approve Regular Calendar
Disapprove or Refer Regular Calendar
Disqualified Does not proceed to General
Assembly
Items on the Consent Calendar will be presented as one motion during the General Assembly from the Resolutions Committee chair. Unless an item on the Consent Calendar is set aside by the majority of the General Assembly, a vote will be taken on the whole calendar. It an item is set aside, it will be opened for discussion, followed by a vote.

Items on the Regular Calendar will be presented individually by the Resolutions Committee chair. After a recommendation is presented by the Resolutions Committee chair, the resolution will be opened for discussion by the General Assembly. A vote will take place following discussion.

Voting Procedures:

Per Cal Cities Bylaws Article XII, Sec. 2, all votes will be conducted by voice vote first. If the presiding official cannot determine the outcome a vote will be taken by an alternative method, typically a raise of voting cards by voting delegates. A roll call vote may be called for by delegates of ten percent or more of the General Assembly.
4 2024 Resolutions Packet
2024 Resolution

1. Resolution on Fair and Equal Treatment of All Governmental Officials at All Levels submitted by City of Glendora
• Letters of concurrence submitted by:
i. April A. Verlato, Mayor, City of Arcadia
ii. Robert Gonzales, Mayor, City of Azusa
iii. Tim Hepburn, Mayor, City of La Verne
iv. Bill Uphoff, Mayor, City of Lomita
v. John M. Cruikshank, Mayor, City of Rancho Palos Verdes • Referred to Governance, Transparency, and Labor Relations Policy Committee
• Policy Committee Recommendation:
• Resolutions Committee Recommendation:
5 2024 Resolutions Packet
Resolution No. 1: Fair and Equal
Treatment of All Governmental
Officials at All Levels submitted by
City of Glendora
6 2024 Resolutions Packet

1. A RESOLUTION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE LEAGUE OF

CALIFORNIA CITIES CALLING FOR THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE TO ENACT LAWS THAT ENSURE THAT “WHAT APPLIES TO ONE, APPLIES TO ALL” IN THE

FAIR AND EQUAL TREATMENT OF ALL GOVERNMENTAL OFFICIALS AT ALL

LEVELS IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Source: City of Glendora
Concurrence of five or more cities/city officials
City Officials: April A. Verlato, Mayor, City of Arcadia; Robert Gonzales, Mayor, City of Azusa; Tim Hepburn, Mayor, City of La Verne; Bill Uphoff, Mayor, City of Lomita; John M. Cruikshank, Mayor, City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Referred to: Governance, Transparency and Labor Relations Policy Committee
WHEREAS, the General Assembly of the League of California Cities objects to the practice of the California Legislature of imposing rules limiting authority or regulating the conduct of local municipal officials that do not also apply to elected officials of the State of California; and WHEREAS, examples of such rules or regulations that apply to local city elected officials that do not otherwise apply to the elected officials of the State of California include, but are not limited to:

California’s open meeting rules, codified in the Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code, Chapter 9, §§ 54950 et seq., which purport to “declare[] that the public commissions, boards and councils and the other public agencies in this State exist to aid in the conduct of the people’s business. It is the intent of the law that their actions be taken openly and that their deliberations be conducted openly,” but which limits its application to “local agencies,” but not including elected officials of the State of California; Creating “one-off” exemptions, in the form of Senate Bill No. 174, from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) which purportedly requires all government agencies to consider the environmental consequences of their actions before approving plans and policies or committing to a course of action on a project in order to demolish and then rebuild State offices for the Governor and other State officials; 7 2024 Resolutions Packet
Adopting rules, in the form of Senate Bill No. 1439, amending the Political Reform Act (the “Act”), by removing the exception for local elected officers from contribution limits requiring disqualification on development project decisions,” but not including elected officials of the State of California;
Adopting rules, in the form of Assembly Bill No. 571, that apply to city and county candidates for local elected office, but not to candidates for state-wide office, including, but not limited to: prohibiting the making a contribution over the AB 571 limit to another candidate in jurisdictions subject to the AB 571; requiring a candidate that has qualified as a committee to establish a separate controlled committee and campaign bank account for each specific office; prohibiting a candidate from redesignating a committee for one election for another election.

WHEREAS, the General Assembly of the League of California Cities now calls upon the Governor and the California Legislature to adopt a policy, practice, and procedure requiring, in their legislative activities, that “what applies to one applies to all.”
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED at the League General Assembly, assembled at the League Annual Conference on October 18, 2024 in Long Beach, California, that the League calls upon the Governor of the State of California and the elected members of the California Legislature, including all members of the Senate and Assembly to adopt the following policy:
“The California State Legislature shall not enact, and the Governor shall not sign into law, any law or regulation that applies solely to elected officials of California cities and counties, unless such law or regulation also applies equally to members of the California State Assembly and Senate. This prohibition shall not apply to laws or regulations affecting the inherent powers of the legislative branch under the California Constitution.” 8 2024 Resolutions Packet
Resolution No. 1: Letters of
Concurrence
9 July 10, 2024
The City Council of Glendora
is proposing the following resolution for consideration at the California League of Cities annual conference
on
October 18, 2024
Proposed Resolution: (“To ensure fairness and equal treatment for all government officials in California”)
“The California State Legislature shall not enact, and the Governor shall not approve, any law or regulation that applies solely to elected officials of California cities and counties, unless such law or regulation also applies equally to members of the California State Assembly and Senate. This prohibition shall not apply to laws or regulations affecting the inherent powers of the legislative branch under the California Constitution.”
The following five city council members are in concurrence with their letters of support (attached):
✓ Mayor John Cruikshank, City of Rancho Palos Verdes
✓ Mayor Bill Uphoff, City of Lomita
✓ Mayor Robert Gonzales, City of Azusa
✓ Mayor April Verlato, City of Arcadia
✓ Mayor Tim Hepburn, City of La Verne
Please confirm receipt of this request.

Sincerely,
Michael Allawos
Council Member
City of Glendora
10 11
12 13
14 15
2024 Resolutions Packet
Resolution No. 1: Staff Analysis
16 League of California Cities Staff Analysis on Resolution No. 1 Staff: Johnnie Pina, Legislative Affairs, Lobbyist
Committee: Governance, Transparency, and Labor Relations Summary:

This Resolution states that the League of California Cities shall call upon the Governor of the State of California and the elected members of the California Legislature, including all members of the Senate and Assembly to adopt the following policy:
“The California State Legislature shall not enact, and the Governor shall not sign into law, any law or regulation that applies solely to elected officials of California cities and counties, unless such law or regulation also applies equally to members of the California State Assembly and Senate. This prohibition shall not apply to laws or regulations affecting the inherent powers of the legislative branch under the California Constitution.”
Background:

This resolution states that examples of the California Legislature imposing rules limiting authority or regulating the conduct of local municipal officials that do not also apply to elected officials of the State of California include, but are not limited to:
• California’s open meeting rules, codified in the Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code, Chapter 9, §§ 54950 et seq.;
• “One-off” exemptions, in the form of Senate Bill No. 174, from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”);
• Rules, in the form of Senate Bill No. 1439, amending the Political Reform Act (the “Act”); and
• Rules, in the form of Assembly Bill No. 571, that apply to city and county candidates for local elected office, but not to candidates for state-wide office.

Ralph M. Brown Act
The California Attorney General’s (AG) Office defines The Ralph M. Brown Act (Brown Act) as what governs meetings conducted by local legislative bodies, such as boards of supervisors, city councils and school boards. The AG’s office states the Act represents the Legislature’s determination of how the balance should be struck between public access to meetings of multi-member public bodies on the one hand and the need for confidential candor, debate, and information gathering on the other.

The Ralph M. Brown Act governs local agencies, the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act covers all state boards and commissions, and Government code 17 9027 governs the state Legislature. The California Constitution also mandates open meetings for state agencies, boards, and commissions. Specifically, the Constitution requires that each local agency comply with the Brown Act (Article I, section 3(b)(7)): and that the proceedings of each house of the Legislature be open and public (with exceptions for employment matters; matters affecting security; confer with legal counsel; and to meet as a caucus (Article IV, section 7).

Although fairly detailed requirements apply to state agencies and other state bodies, they do not apply to the Legislature. The Legislature has Constitutional authority to adopt rules for its proceedings that are consistent with the requirement that the proceedings of each house and the committees be open and public.

Another notable difference between the Legislature and a city council is the ability for Legislators to have a caucus to discuss a bill, express how they will vote, and to count votes. This is not allowed under the Brown Act. One other difference is that the laws governing teleconferencing for members of the state Legislature is far less flexible than it is for local bodies. However, state agencies have more flexibility than locals in that regard.

California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”)
The Resolution cites the Legislature's action in exempting from CEQA the reconstruction of the State Capitol Annex building. The State Legislature enacted the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in 1970, establishing it as a public disclosure law for the environmental review of discretionary projects and a process for mitigating or avoiding potential environmental impacts.

SB 174 (Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review) Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 74, Statutes of 2024 was signed into law July 2, 2024. This bill exempts the work performed under the State Capitol Building Annex Act of 2016 from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In this example the Legislature exempted themselves as not being considered a “public agency,” “state agency,” or “lead agency” under CEQA. A lead agency under CEQA is the public agency that has the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a project that is subject to CEQA.

Over the years, the Legislature has also created many CEQA exceptions and exemptions for local projects involving local agencies as well.

The Political Reform Act (PRA) - Senate Bill No. 1439
SB 1439 (Glazer) Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 848, Statutes of 2022 amends section 84308 and is aimed at preventing "pay-to-play" practices, in part by prohibiting parties, participants, and their respective agents in a 18 proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use from contributing more than $250 to an officer of an agency during a 12 month period. When the Levine Act was first enacted in 1982, Section 84308 applied to appointed members of boards and commissions who were running for elective office. SB 1439 expended this law to now apply to local elected officials. Since it is focused on permits and licenses, it now applies to State agencies and local agencies that approve permits and licenses. Section 84308 does not apply to the Legislature or the Courts. It is important to note that unlike local governments, neither issue permits and licenses.

The Political Reform Act (PRA) - Assembly Bill No. 571
AB 571 (Mullin) Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 556, Statutes of 2019 established default campaign contribution limits for county and city office at the same level as the limit on contributions from individuals to candidates for Senate and Assembly, effective January 1, 2021. This bill permitted a county or city to establish its own contribution limits, which would prevail over these default limits.

The Resolution cites AB 571 as an example of treating cities differently than the State. The Fair Political Practices Commission clarifies in their AB 571 fact sheet that under AB 571 a city may elect to have "no" contribution limit in which case the state contribution limit will not apply as a default for that jurisdiction. A city or county can set contribution limits higher than the default state limit, AB 571 sets a default in line with contributions Assembly Members and Senators if a city or county is silent on contribution limits.

Fiscal Impact:

Unknown.

Existing Cal Cities Policy:

Mission Statement
To expand and protect local control for cities through education and advocacy to enhance the quality of life for all Californians.

We Believe:
• Local self-governance is the cornerstone of democracy. • In the involvement of all stakeholders in establishing goals and in solving problems.
• In conducting the business of government with transparency, openness, respect, and civility. The spirit of honest public service is what builds communities.
• Open decision-making that is of the highest ethical standards honors the public trust.
• The vitality of cities is dependent upon their fiscal stability and local autonomy. The active participation of all city officials increases Cal Cities’ effectiveness.
19 • Partnerships and collaborations are essential elements of focused advocacy and lobbying.
• Ethical and well-informed city officials are essential for responsive, visionary leadership and effective and efficient city operations.

Comments:

Additional Examples
The Legislature has passed and the Governor has signed many laws that apply to local governments and do not apply to the state or the state Legislature. This year AB 2561(McKinnor) was introduced, which requires local governments to present in a public meeting a detailed report about their vacancy rates and detailed information about their hiring practices. This is an attempt to address public sector vacancy rates. This bill does not apply to the state in a time when they are also dealing with high vacancy rates.

Additionally, there were several bills that aim to amend the Levine Act, which now applies to local elected officials, to make changes to SB 1439, referenced previously in the analysis. None of the bills would amend the law to be applicable to Assembly Members or Senators.

AB 817 (Pacheco), co-sponsored by Cal Cities tried to bring parity to the Brown Act by making the teleconference rules for state advisory bodies the same for local advisory bodies but the Legislature struck the bill down.

Applying to elected officials or to the legislative body? Legislature or the State? The resolution also states, “… applies solely to elected officials of California cities and counties, unless such law or regulation also applies equally to members of the California State Assembly and Senate.”
This portion of the resolve clause is specifically speaking to local elected officials and State Assembly Members and Senators. However, many of the “where as” clauses are in reference to laws that apply to cities, the state and the Legislature as government agencies and not specifically to the elected officials on the governing bodies. For example, the Brown Act applies rules to the Legislative body and not the individual council member. Additionally, the city council as a whole is the lead agency under CEQA and not the individual council members.

Inherent Powers of the Legislative Branch
The resolution also states, “This prohibition shall not apply to laws or regulations affecting the inherent powers of the legislative branch under the California Constitution.”
It is unclear what inherent powers of the legislate branch under the California Constitution means in this context. The legislative branch does have the power 20 of preemption over cities and can state that a change in law is a matter of state wide concern. This allows the legislative branch to apply new laws or amend existing laws to apply to general law and charter cities. It seems like the last sentence of the resolve clause could negate the rest of the resolve clause if not clarified.

Support:

The following letters of concurrence were received:

April A. Verlato, Mayor, City of Arcadia
Robert Gonzales, Mayor, City of Azusa
Tim Hepburn, Mayor, City of La Verne
Bill Uphoff, Mayor, City of Lomita
John M. Cruikshank, Mayor, City of Rancho Palos Verdes
21