City Council Meeting
Meeting Time: 10-25-22 18:00
eComments Report
Meetings Meeting
Time
Agenda
Items
Comments Support Oppose Neutral
City Council Meeting 10-25-22
18:00
38 5 3 1 1
Sentiments for All Meetings
The following graphs display sentiments for comments that have location data. Only locations of users who have commented will be shown.
Overall Sentiment
City Council Meeting
10-25-22 18:00
Agenda Name Comments Support Oppose Neutral
1 0 0 1
5. Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Amended Multifamily Residential Project at 921 W. Riverside Drive and Approval of the Ministerial Design Review for the Amended Project Pursuant to Burbank Municipal Code Title 10, Chapter 1 (Zoning), Division 12 (Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process) and Senate Bill 35 (CA Government Code Section 65913.4) - Community Development Department
3 2 1 0
1 1 0 0
Sentiments for All Agenda Items
The following graphs display sentiments for comments that have location data. Only locations of users who have commented will be shown.
Overall Sentiment
Agenda Item: eComments for 5. Adoption of a Resolution Approving the Amended Multifamily Residential Project at 921 W.
Riverside Drive and Approval of the Ministerial Design Review for the Amended Project Pursuant to Burbank Municipal Code Title 10, Chapter 1 (Zoning), Division 12 (Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process) and Senate Bill 35 (CA Government Code Section 65913.4) - Community Development Department
Overall Sentiment
James DeCarli
Location:
Submitted At: 4:56pm 10-25-22
1. Public Notice had insufficient information regarding website links to the project plan and staff report, and how to submit
2. staff report which identifies “Friends of the Rancho for Equestrian Safety”. To our knowledge this group does not exist.
3.Project site does not qualify under SB-35. Not “infill” land, and is not designated in the General Plan for housing. I prefer mitigation over litigation. This is why CEQA is important because it identifies the areas of significant impacts and opportunity to mitigate these risks in the plan.
Jack Palmer
Location:
Submitted At: 4:18pm 10-25-22
We need housing in Southern California. State law mandates that we approve this. There is no reason to spend more time and money avoiding it.
Ken Stahl
Location: 92660, Newport Beach
Submitted At: 4:09pm 10-25-22
YIMBY Law already sent a letter by email to the City Council. This is a shortened comment.
The City's prior denial of this Project resulted in two lawsuits against it, one brought by YIMBY . YIMBY brought its lawsuit to remedy the City’s violations of the HAA and SB 35. We are pleased that the City has agreed to reconsider this Project.
We would like to remind the City as we have previously that it is required to approve this project ministerially. We further advise the Council to reconsider Ordinance 22-3,964 and its designation of the Council as the approval body for SB 35 applications.
Overall Sentiment