NINTH AMENDMENT
TO
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
DATE: November 1, 2022
PARTIES: "CITY"
THE CITY OF BURBANK, a municipal corporation
Designated Official: Name: Patrick Prescott
Title: Community Development Director
Telephone: (818) 238-5176
Mailing Address: 275 E. Olive Avenue
P. O. Box 6459
Burbank, CA 91510
"ENGINEER"
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Representative: Name: Jean Fares, PE
Title: Senior Vice President
Telephone: (747) 900-8400
Mailing Address: 21820 Burbank Blvd., Ste. 230
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
TERM: Original Commencement date: November 6, 2013
Original Completion date: June 30, 2015
1st Amended Completion date: June 30, 2016
2nd Amended Completion date: June 30, 2017
3rd Amended Completion date: June 30, 2018
4th Amended Completion date: June 30, 2019
5th Amended Completion date: June 30, 2020
6th Amended Completion date: June 30, 2021
7th Amended Completion date: June 30, 2022
8th Amended Completion date: June 30, 2023
9th Amended Completion date: June 30, 2024___________
ATTACHMENT 1-1
COST OF SERVICE:
Original Cost of Service: $699,921.00
1st Amendment to Cost of Service: No change
2nd Amendment to Cost of Service: No change
3rd Amendment to Cost of Service: No change
4th Amendment to Cost of Service: No change
5th Amendment to Cost of Service: No change
6th Amendment to Cost of Service: No change
7th Amendment to Cost of Service: No change
8th Amendment to Cost of Service: No change
9th Amendment to Cost of Service: +$159,160.00_____
Revised Cost of Service: $859,081.00_____
THIS NINTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES (this “Amendment”), is made and entered into on the date listed above (the “Effective Date”), by and between THE CITY OF BURBANK, a municipal corporation (the “City”) and KIMLEY- HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. (the “Engineer”). The City and the Engineer are herein referred to, individually, as a “Party”, and, collectively, as the “Parties”.
1.0 Purpose; Definitions. City and Engineer entered into an Agreement for Engineering Services dated August 20, 2013, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Agreement for Engineering Services dated April 30, 2016, as amended by that certain Second Amendment to Agreement for Engineering Services dated May 2, 2016, as amended by that certain Third Amendment to Agreement for Engineering Services dated June 22, 2017, as amended by that certain Fourth Amendment to Agreement for Engineering Services dated June 29, 2018, as amended by that certain Fifth Amendment to Agreement for Engineering Services dated June 29, 2019, as amended by that certain Sixth Amendment to Agreement for Engineering Services dated June 29, 2020, as amended by that certain Seventh Amendment to Agreement for Engineering Services dated June 29, 2021, as amended by that certain Eighth Amendment to Agreement for Engineering Services dated June 29, 2022, (collectively the “Agreement”), for Engineer to provide Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (“PS&E”) for the San Fernando Bikeway Project. Now, City and Engineer desire to amend the Agreement with this Amendment in order to provide additional design services and to extend the term of the Agreement to complete PS&E documents. Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning assigned to such term in the Agreement.
2.0 Amendment to Services. In addition to the services to be performed in the Agreement, Engineer, as an independent Contractor, agrees to perform during the term of the Agreement, each and every of the additional services set forth on the "Amended Scope of Services" attached hereto as Exhibit A-9. The initiation of Service by the ATTACHMENT 1-2
Engineer will commence upon receipt of a written notice from the Designated Official or Project Manager authorizing Engineer to proceed, and only to the extent of such authorization. The services of the Engineer shall include the making of all investigations, studies, and analysis required by the conditions involved in each request of the Designated Official or Project Manager.
3.0 Amendment to Compensation. The total compensation payable by the City to the Engineer is hereby amended to a not to exceed amount of $859,081.00. The City shall pay for the additional services of Engineer set forth in Exhibit A-9 as indicated on the “Amended Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit B-9.
4.0 Amendment to Term. The Parties hereby agree that the Term is hereby extended to June 30, 2024.
5.0 Execution Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts and each such duplicate counterpart shall constitute an original, any one of which may be used for any purpose without the production of its duplicate counterpart. Moreover, each counterpart shall be deemed for all purposes to be an original, and all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument, binding on all Parties hereto.
Transmission by facsimile, electronic mail, and/or other validated instantaneous electronic transmission to one Party of a true copy of a counterpart duly executed by the other Party shall constitute valid delivery of such counterpart, and shall be valid, binding and effective for all purposes. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the authority under this Section to execute this Amendment with an electronic signature shall be limited to a physical (“wet ink”) signature placed on a counterpart to this Amendment by a Party, and transmitted electronically as described in this Section to the other Party.
6.0 Ratification of Agreement for Engineering Services. All other provisions of the Agreement, not inconsistent with this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect and are specifically incorporated herein.
[Signature Page on the Following Page]
In recognition of the obligations stated in this Amendment, the parties have executed ATTACHMENT 1-3
this Amendment on the date indicated above.
“ENGINEER” “CITY”
________________________________ By: _____________________________ Signature Signature
________________________________ ________________________________ Name (please print) Name (please print)
________________________________ ________________________________ Title Title
If Engineer is a Corporation or LLC, a Approved as to Form second signature is required. Office of the City Attorney
________________________________ By: _____________________________ Signature Signature
________________________________ ________________________________ Name (please print) Name (please print)
________________________________ ________________________________ Title Title
ATTEST:
Office of the City Clerk
By: _____________________________
Signature
________________________________
Name (please print)
________________________________
Title
ATTACHMENT 1-4
EXHIBIT A-9
AMENDED SCOPE OF SERVICES
Engineer shall perform the following additional services for the benefit of the City:
Task 8.1 – Buena Vista Traffic Signal Improvements ($28,975) Engineer will modify traffic signal at the intersection at San Fernando Boulevard and Buena Vista intersection for the bikeway improvements. The modification will require reconstruction of the porkchop median, traffic signal modification, and striping of existing crosswalk. The approved 30% concept plan prepared by others did not provide clear indication of such modification. Engineer will prepare the following to address the requested change:
Traffic Signal Modification Plan (1 sheet): This plan will be prepared using the field review data, as-builts received from the City, and the proposed street improvements plan. One (1) sheet will be prepared for the intersection at a scale of 1” = 20’. Caltrans symbology will be used. The design will be prepared in accordance with current City, MUTCD and Caltrans Standard Plans (year to be specified by the City).
Construction Details Sheets (1 sheet): Engineer will prepare construction details sheets for the intersection improvements including curb ramp reconstruction, median reconstruction, pavement removal and replacement, curb and gutter reconstruction, and adjustments to surface utility structure within the limit of work. This task assumes no drainage improvements would be required.
Signing and Striping Plan (1 sheet): Engineer will prepare signing and striping plans at a scale of 1” = 40’ for the improvements. The design will be prepared in accordance with current City, MUTCD and Caltrans Standard Plans (year to be specified by the City).
Task 8.2 – Update of 30% Concept Plans based on I-5 Project Changes ($30,625) Engineer will update project design from the previously approved 30% plans as noted below.
• Utility vault coordination – Due to the existing telecom vaults not being constructed at elevation that matches the proposed bikeway or existing curb, Engineer will conduct various coordination with the utility companies to understand the design and cost impacts to the project. These efforts include the following:
o Cost estimate coordination
o Utility vault sections and exhibits
o Meetings and coordination with utility companies and City • Concept redesign – Engineer will update the original concept layout to avoid the conflicts with the existing utility vaults including the following:
o Meandering Bikeway to avoid utility vaults
o Bikeway shift and proper offset from Metro facility and removal of walkways at segments o Lowered bikeway concept to match lower vault elevation at various locations. This option included the following tasks:
▪ Drainage option exhibits and associated drainage calculations ▪ Additional drainage option review and calls
• Bikeway safety barrier concepts – Engineer will provide support to assess the options for safety barriers including various height fencing and landscape hedging. Our efforts included the following:
ATTACHMENT 1-5
o Cost estimate coordination for safety barrier options o Meetings and coordination with City and barrier manufacturer • Hollywood Way redesign options – Engineer will provide additional options for alignment of the bikeway and roadway striping at Hollywood Way per City request due to narrow traffic lanes and impacts to street lighting with median removal per the approved 30% concept prepared by others. The revised options included the following:
o No median and new striping concept
o Bikeway routing to southside
o Bikeway around the bridge gap and track
Task 8.3 – New design Impacts from other agency projects ($16,625) Engineer will provide additional design support for the coordination with on-going projects by other agencies not anticipated during the initial phase of the project. The design connection elements will be reflected in 60%, 90% and 100% PS&E. This task includes the following specific projects with Metro and BWP and assumes no major structural redesign would be required for the BWP storm drain improvement conflict with boardwalk detail at County channel portion of the bikeway.
• Metrolink future station platform expansion and pedestrian grade crossing • Metrolink SCORE project for fencing
• BWP storm drain improvement plans for connection to LACFCD channel
Task 8.4 - Bikeway Lighting Plans ($5,250 for this amendment to be supplemented w/ $12,250 Street Lighting fee from base contract)
Bikeway Lighting Plans: Engineer will prepare bikeway lighting plans for the portion of the proposed bikeway alongside the Burbank Channel using the as-builts received from the City and the proposed street improvements plan. The bikeway lighting plans will be prepared in accordance with current City of Burbank Standards and will be prepared at 40 scale (1” = 40’). Engineer anticipates a maximum of two (2) 24” x 36” full-size sheets. The new lights are anticipated to be connected to the existing lighting system.
Bikeway Lighting Specifications: Engineer will prepare an additional portion of the specifications for bikeway lighting specifications utilizing the City’s “Front-End” documents.
Bikeway Lighting Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC): Engineer will prepare an additional portion of the OPCC to account for bikeway lighting construction costs based on biddable construction items identified within the design package. Contingencies will be included at the appropriate percentage.
Bikeway Lighting Meetings and Coordination: Engineer will attend up to 10 hours of meetings and/or conference calls with the City to coordinate and review the bikeway lighting design.
Deliverables:
Engineer anticipates up to two submittals (90% & 100% PS&E) to the City of Burbank for review. We will address up to one round of consolidated comments from the City. Engineer will submit one electronic copy of the Bikeway Lighting Plans, Specifications and Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Assumptions:
• Bikeway Lighting Specifications and details are assumed to be provided by the City to match the lighting constructed for the South Channel project.
• Bikeway lighting spacing will be provided by the City and will match the spacing requirement for South Channel project. Separate photometric analysis is assumed to be not required.
Task 9.1 – Additional Structural Design ($31,294)
ATTACHMENT 1-6
Engineer’s team will provide additional structural design support for the project related to the expanded pedestrian board walk system at County channel based on BWP’s criteria for maintenance vehicle access. This task also includes design of a low height retaining wall to support the backfill underneath the bikeway at the County channel and modification to the railroad bridge over the Hollywood Way to add a pedestrian walkway.
These design elements will be reflected in 90% and 100% PS&E.
Pedestrian Boardwalk
Burbank Water and Power (BWP) has requested an expanded maintenance vehicle access on the boardwalk structure along the county channel not initially envisioned during the PS&E phase (90% PS&E progress for channel portion) for the initial submittal to the County. The boardwalk structure will be modified to accommodate BWP’s maintenance vehicle turning onto the structure. The structure length will increase by approximately 50 feet and will be widened by approximately 1 foot. At the end of the structure, the walkway width will be narrowed by increasing the curb width.
Narrowing the walkway width is necessary to avoid removing or modifying the existing barrier on Varney Street.
Assumptions:
▪ No changes to structure type. Only the structure width and length will change.
Deliverables:
▪ 90% and 100% PS&E per original Scope of Work.
New Retaining Wall
A low height retaining wall will be designed to support the backfill underneath the walkway north of the pedestrian boardwalk along the county channel. The City provided initial preference for the manufacturer-designed retaining wall (Keystone) to match the south channel wall. The City now desires a cast-in-place concrete wall (e.g. slough wall) that Engineer’s structural sub, Biggs Cardosa, will design as part of the PS&E package in lieu of design/detailing by the wall manufacturer or specialty wall design firm. Engineer will provide the wall layout, including plan and elevation details (i.e. finished grade elevations at the top and bottom of wall). Biggs Cardosa will provide a structural detail sheet showing wall thickness, embedment requirements, and reinforcement details.
Assumptions:
▪ The wall type will be a cast-in-place concrete slough wall. ▪ Engineer will show plan limits of the wall and elevation data on the civil sheets. Engineer’s structural sub will provide a Retaining Wall Details sheet.
Deliverables:
▪ 90% and 100% PS&E for new retaining wall design
Hollywood Way Bridge
The original Scope of Work included work on the sidewalk, bike railing, and median of the vehicular bridge over Hollywood Way. This work is being removed from the scope and replaced with work on the separate railroad bridge over Hollywood Way. The existing railroad bridge contains one active railroad track on the north side and empty space on the south side intended for a future track. The south side will be converted to a pedestrian walkway and will feature a ballast retainer separating the existing track from the proposed walkway. Engineer’s structural sub, Biggs Cardosa, will provide details for the ballast retainer and its connection to the existing bridge deck.
Assumptions:
▪ No structural analysis of the existing bridge is required. The added pedestrian and dead loads associated with the new walkway are much lower than the railroad loading used for the existing design.
ATTACHMENT 1-7
▪ Engineer’s team will provide details for a ballast retainer and connection of ballast retainer to existing railroad bridge deck.
Deliverables:
▪ 90% and 100% PS&E per the original Scope of Work.
Task 12 – Environmental Revalidation ($46,391)
Engineer shall conduct a new Phase 1 Initial Site Assessment (“Phase I ISA”) for a site consisting of an approximately
2.1-mile long Class-I bikeway in the City - spanning from San Fernando Boulevard/Hollywood Way to Empire Center and from the Western Burbank Channel at Cypress Avenue to the Downtown Burbank Metrolink Station. In general, the bikeway will parallel San Fernando Road and the LACMTA (Metro) Metrolink railroad right -of-way. Portions of the bikeway will be constructed within this rail right-of-way in the City of Burbank, CA.
Engineer will provide the services specifically set forth below.
Task 12.1 – Phase I ESA
Engineer will prepare a Phase I Initial Site Assessment (ISA) for the project, in accordance with the sub -tasks set forth below. The following sub-tasks refer to only that information that is defined as reasonably ascertainable (ASTM E 1527-13, 6.2.1).
Task 12.1.1 Records Review
This task will be conducted by Engineer consistent with ASTM E 1527-13, 8.0 3) and Chapter 18 of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) document titled Project Development Procedures Manual (1999, and will consist of the following:
a. Record Search – An environmental database search will be prepared encompassing the minimum search distances listed in ASTM E1527-13, 8.2.1. This report will be reviewed for known and suspect contaminated sites. Where available, local environmental agency, and other local governmental authority files, as defined in ASTM E 1527-13, 8.2.2.1 may be reviewed, if the Environmental Professional determines the files to be reasonably ascertainable and relevant to the successful completion of the Phase I ISA. This sc ope of work assumes that searches can be completed utilizing existing online database research. Should additional research include review of paper files as regulatory agencies be required, the additional research shall be considered additional services.
b. IC/EC Registries – Engineer will review readily available databases on institutional and engineering (IC/EC) controls and Activity Use Limitations (AULs).
c. Title Search and Judicial Records – Engineer will review these documents as provided by the City.
d. Aerial Photograph Review – Engineer will retrieve and examine readily available historical aerial photographs of the site and the surrounding vicinity. Aerial photographs will be researched to the earliest date that is reasonably obtainable.
e. Review of Local City Directories and Historical Maps – Engineer will obtain and review readily available historical city directories, fire insurance maps, and historical topographic maps.
f. Other Historical Sources - Should Engineer determine that other non -traditional sources may provide information relevant to the completion of the Phase I ISA; these sources will be reviewed and documented.
Task 12.1.2 Site Reconnaissance
Engineer will conduct a site reconnaissance consistent wit h ASTM E 1527 -13, 9.0. The Site Reconnaissance will be non-invasive. Engineer will not collect and/or analyze any samples. The site reconnaissance will include, per City ATTACHMENT 1-8
direction, observation of, or observation of the likelihood of, PCBs, septic tanks, and evidence of mold. Engineer will be allowed appropriate access to all areas of the site and the site reconnaissance will be conducted as a single event.
At the time of site reconnaissance all existing buildings will be vacant. Should an additional site reconnaissance be required due to access limitations, the additional site reconnaissance shall be considered additional services.
Consistent with AS TM E 1527 -13, 10.5.2.3 and 10.5.4 Engineer will make a reasonable attempt to conduct the following interviews:
a. Engineer will attempt to interview current and past owners, operators and occupants of the property that have or are likely to have material information regarding uses, physical characteristics and the potential for RECs at the subject property consistent with ASTM E 1527-13 sections 10.5.1, 10.5.2, 10.5.2.1, 10.5.2.2, and
10.5.4. b. In the case of abandoned properties as defined in ASTM E 1527 -13, 3.2.1, where there is evidence of uncontrolled access or unauthorized uses, Engineer will attempt to interview current neighboring or nearby property owners (ASTM E 1527-13, 10.5.5).
c. Engineer will attempt to interview one or more of the following state or local agencies as defined in ASTM 1527-13, 11:
a. Local fire department
b. Local health agency
c. Local environmental regulatory agency
In addition, Engineer will review the current operator's permi ts and records as they relate to hazardous waste generator, storage, and disposal. Engineer will provide an opinion on compliance with these permits. Engineer will limit its review to what the operator provides and base its determination of compliance on those permits/records.
This assumes the operator provides Engineer with all of their permits and associated records related to hazardous material generator, storage, and disposal. Engineer will prepare a brief summary of our findings of this compliance review and provide it as an appendix to the Phase I ISA.
Engineer will perform a Tier 1 Vapor Encroachment Screening (VES) consistent with ASTM E E2600 -10, with the purpose of identifying if a Vapor Encroachment Condition (VEC) exists in association with the subject Site. A VEC is defined as the presence or likely presence of contaminants of concern (COC) vapors in the subsurface of the subject Site caused by a release of hazardous substances and/or petroleum compounds into soil and groundwater. The ASTM E1527-13 document standardizes the terms releases and migration consistent with those used in CERCLA and AAI.
As such, potentially harmful vapors must be evaluated during the completion of a Phase I ISA.
Task 12.1.3 Report Preparation
Upon completion of the aforementioned sub -tasks, Engineer will prepare a summary report of the results of the Phase I ISA Update as outlined in Appendix X4 of ASTM E 1527 -13. Engineer will provide the report to the City in electronic format (portable document format).
Deliverables:
• Draft Phase 1 Initial Site Assessment Report transmitted via email in an electronic format suitable for City review and comment
• Final Phase 1 Initial Site Assessment Report transmitted via email as an electronic PDF, in response to City comments on Draft
Task 12.2 – Reevaluate Environmental Documentation
Due to the passage of time, the prior documentation, concluding that the Project is categorically exempt from further analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and categorically excluded under the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) should be updated to reflect the current project components and ATTACHMENT 1-9
the data from the Phase I and Phase II reports. Engineer shall prepare a draft CEQA Exemption/NEPA Categorical Exclusion (CE/CE) using the latest Caltrans form (dated June 02, 2022), w ith appropriate supporting information as needed.
In addition, the City has identified the need to coordinate with and document environmental clearance of the portion of the project that involves the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) appr oval.
Task 12.3.- Project Management/Coordination
Engineer will provide informal on-going project management meetings throughout the performance of the Phase I and Phase II investigations and Environmental Documentation phase, including coordination with City staff, multiple subcontractors, and outside agencies.
Task 12.4 – Phase II Investigation and Infiltration Testing – Contingency Budget A revised Phase II Investigation will be performed as a separate scope of work. However, Engineer shall include a contingency to cover additional permit, environmental analysis, and geotechnical work required by Metro or other outside agencies. Included below are the contingency items that may be required . Contingency fees will be spent only with explicit approval from the City.
Permits and Access
Negotiations with Metro will be required to enter the alignment for sampling and infiltration testing. It is unknown if there are permit and/or access fees required by Metro, so we have assumed that the fees could be up to $10,000.
Contingency Environmental Analyses:
o 10% QA/QC for VOCs, TPH and Title 22 Metals;
o 5 samples from 1 and/or 3 feet analyzed for PAHs;
o 9 samples from 5 feet analyzed for VOCs, TPH and Title 22 Metals; o 50% of original soil samples (9 total) will be analyzed for soluble threshold limit concentration (STLC) lead; and
o 10% of original soil samples (2 total) will be analyzed for toxicity characteristic leaching potential (TCLP) lead.
Contingency Geotechnical Analyses
Per County of Los Angeles Public Works Geotechnical and Materials Division Memo GS200.2 (6/ 30/2017):
o 24 analyses for moisture density (ASTM D2937 & 2216); o 8 sieve analyses (ASTM D422);
o 6 Atterberg Limit analyses (ASTM D4318); and
o 4 hydrometer analyses (ASTM D422).
• Requirement to drill to 10 feet beyond the invert of infiltration (5 feet bgs), as outlined in County guidance, which equates to drilling/sampling to 15 feet bgs.
• Traffic control plan for the City of Burbank for sampling locations, if required. • Collect geotechnical soil samples at every 2.5-foot intervals using Modified California split spoon samplers, which have 2.42 inch inside diameter and a 3.0 inch outside diameter. This is anticipated to be 2 to 4 geotechnical samples per hole depending upon the analyses to be conducted.
Follow up environmental analyses for the 5-foot sample will be conducted if there are exceedances of 50 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) for total lead, arsenic and/or chromium; 1,000 mg/kg for TPH as diesel or heavy hydrocarbons; and/or any detections of VOCs in the 3 foot sample collected at the same location. If impacts are ATTACHMENT 1-10
observed in the 1-foot sample, but not in the 3-foot sample at any location, then analyses will not be required for the 5-foot sample.
Follow-up soluble environmental analyses will require review of data generated during the initial sampling as compared to the 50 mg/kg standard (10 times the STLC value of 5 milligrams per liter) requiring soluble analyses for lead, arsenic and/or chromium. Based on historic uses along the alignment, lead is expected to be the metal with the highest concentrations; thus, potentially requiring the majority of supplemental analyses. The results of the soluble analyses will define the anticipated characterization category for the waste that may be generated during construction. Below is a workflow on characterization of waste based on sample results:
• If total concentration for lead, arsenic and/or chromium are less than 50 mg/kg, and there are no other metals that have exceedances of their TTLC, 10 times STLC value and/or 20 times the TCLP value; and TPH concentrations are less than 1,000 mg/kg and there are no VOCs detected, the waste would be considered non-hazardous for disposal.
• If total concentrations for lead, arseni c and/or chromium are greater than 50 mg/kg but less than the respective total threshold limit concentration (TTLC) value (1,000 for lead, 500 mg/kg for arsenic and 500 mg/kg for chromium), then STLC analyses would be required. If any of the STLC concentr ations exceeded the 5 mg/L standard for these metals, the material would, at a minimum, be considered non -Resource Conservation Recovery Act (non -RCRA) hazardous (also termed California Hazardous) and additional TCLP analyses would be required to determine if it would be characterized as Resource Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA) hazardous. Additionally, if the total concentration for these constituents exceeded the TTLC, this would automatically be characterized as non-RCRA hazardous and TCLP analyses would be required to determine the hazardous nature of the waste.
• If TCLP concentrations for any of these three constituents exceeded 5 mg/L, the material would be considered RCRA hazardous.
As stated above, it is anticipated that approximately 50% of the orig inal samples (9 total) will be analyzed for STLC and 10% analyzed for TCLP (2 total) to determine waste characterization for future construction activities. Note that the density of sampling is not sufficient to fully characterize the waste along the alig nment but will indicate potential issues that may arise during construction related to waste handling/management.
ATTACHMENT 1-11
EXHIBIT B-9
AMENDED SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
For the services outlined in Amended Scope of Services above, the Engineer and the City agree that the Engineer shall earn its compensation according to the following method:
□ Milestone Basis: The City shall pay for the services on a milestone basis.
Engineer shall invoice the City the applicable milestone amount upon the achievement of the following tasks set forth below:
ATTACHMENT 1-12
ATTACHMENT 1-13